Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2020-08-18 City Council Meeting Packet
Agenda City Council Meeting City of Edina, Minnesota VIRTUAL MEETING Make live testimony: 800-374-0221, enter Conference ID 9178107. Testimony for the public hearing can also be made at www.BetterTogetherEdina.org/public-hearings. Watch live meeting: Edina TV (Comcast Channels 813 or 16); Facebook.com/EdinaMN; EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeetings Tuesday, August 18, 2020 7:00 PM I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Pledge of Allegiance IV.Approval Of Meeting Agenda V.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Mayor will invite residents to share issues or concerns that are not scheduled for a future public hearing. Items that are on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. The City Manager will respond to questions raised during Community Comments at the next meeting. A.City Manager's Response to Community Comments VI.Adoption Of Consent Agenda All agenda items listed on the Consent Agenda will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless requested to be removed by a Council Member. If removed the item will be considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve, unless otherwise noted in consent item.) A.Approve Minutes: Work Session and Regular, August 5, 2020 B.Approve Payment of Claims C.Request for Purchase: Utility Rate Study Update D.Resolution No. 2020-83: Approve Public Health Emergency Preparedness Agreement with City of Bloomington E.Request for Purchase: Fiber Optic Network Expansion F.Request for Purchase: Security Cameras for Edina Liquor Stores G.Request for Purchase: Well No. 19 Rehabilitation H.Approve Cooperative Agreement with Nine Mile Creek Watershed for Rosland Park Clean Water Project I.Approve Amended VEAP Service Agreement J.Approve Lease Agreement with Breakaway Academy Inc. K.Approve Cooperative Agreement for Police Mental Health Program L.Accept Public Access and Public Parking Easements, and A@ordable Housing Covenants at 4500 France Avenue M.Ordinance No. 2020-11: Amending Chapter 10 of the Edina City Code Concerning Hourly Restrictions on Certain Operations N.Ordinance No. 2020-12: Amending Chapter 2 of Edina City Code Concerning Boards, Committees, and Commissions O.Resolution No. 2020-84: Accepting Donations VII.Special Recognitions And Presentations A.Proclamation: Women's Equality Day, August 26, 2020 VIII.Public Hearings During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after sta@ and/or applicants make their presentations. The following guidelines are in place to ensure an eDcient, fair, and respectful hearing; limit your testimony to three minutes and to the matter under consideration; the Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary; avoid repeating remarks or points of view made by previous speakers. The use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A.Accept Withdrawal of Resolution 2020-71 and Cancel the Proposed Public Hearing IX.Reports/Recommendations: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A.Approve 2020-2021 Student Commission Appointments B.Resolution 2020-80: Implementing the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update C.Human Rights & Relations Commission Recommendation for Ensuring Equity in City Facility Art & Decor D.Ordinance No. 2020-10: Zoning Ordinance Amendments Regarding Setbacks in the Greater Southdale Area, Building Material Requirements, Requiring A@ordable Housing in Commercial Zoning Districts, Design Experience Guidelines, and Total Garage Stalls Required E.Approve Summary Publication for Ordinance No. 2020-10 F.Resolution No. 2020-81: Site Plan Review for 3451 Parklawn Avenue for York Gardens Senior Living G.Sketch Plan Review for 6600-6800 France Avenue X.Correspondence And Petitions A.Correspondence XI.Aviation Noise Update XII.Mayor And Council Comments XIII.Manager's Comments A.Q2 Quarterly Business Reports XIV.Calendar of City Council Meetings and Events XV.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampliLcation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:City Manager's Response to Community Comments Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: City Manager Neal will respond to questions asked at the previous council meeting. Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve Minutes: Work Session and Regular, August 5, 2020 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Minutes as presented. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: Draft Work Session, Aug. 5 Minutes: Draft Regular, Aug. 5 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL VIRTUAL MEETING AUGUST 5, 2020 5:30 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:32 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Anderson, Brindle, Fischer and Mayor Hovland. Member Staunton did not answer roll call because of technical difficulty. Member Staunton returned to the meeting. Staff present: Scott Neal, City Manager; Cary Teague, Community Development Director; Emily Bodker, Assistant City Planner; Nick Lovejoy, I.T. Systems Administrator; Risi Karim, City Management Fellow; Jennifer Garske, Executive Assistant; Sharon Allison, City Clerk. Commissioners present: Ian Nemerov, Chair; Jerry Strauss, Lou Miranda, Jimmy Bennett, Jo Ann Olsen, Sheila Berube, Kate Agnew. JOINT MEETING: PLANNING COMMISSION Community Development Director Teague introduced Chair Nemerov. Chair Nemerov discussed the Comprehensive Plan and stated he was happy it was completed, pending Council approval. He described the Project Tracker that the commission uses to track progress of work plan items, and items in the Pipeline that they do not want to forget that could turn into future work plan items. Regarding review of the Parking Ordinance, chair Nemerov said they started by benchmarking against neighboring cities like Eden Prairie and Minnetonka. The commission asked for Council guidance on: • How to incentivize and increase transit use • A clear understanding of why the parking ordinance was on their work plan and how it relates to the needs of the community • How to emulate 50th & France parking at 44th or in other commercial nodes • Should they remain reactive to projects; and • How to make commercial nodes transit and pedestrian friendly. Regarding questions raised by the Planning Commission, Council said they need to see innovative ideas and research with options for parking solutions that works for commercial nodes of varying sizes. Council recommended looking at St. Louis Park and peer cities outside of the metro area that are being innovative and creative, and identify what can be done in the short, medium, and long term. Teague said a consultant will be hired to assist staff. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:30 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, __________________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by the Edina City Council August 18, 2020. __________________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL VIRTUAL MEETING AUGUST 5, 2020 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. and stated the meeting was being held remotely in compliance with Governor Walz’ Stay at Home Order then shared the procedure for public hearing and community comment. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland. Absent: None. III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IV. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED AS AMENDED Manager Neal stated staff recommended tabling Item VIII.E., Resolution 2020-80, Implementing the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update, to the August 18, 2020, meeting. Member Fischer made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to approve the meeting agenda as amended. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT Andy Brown, 5512 Park Place, spoke about Arden Park field conditions and drainage concerns in his yard. Niles Bisping, 5100 Abercrombie Drive, stated his opposition to the park removal proposal at Duggan Plaza and Abercrombie Drive. Peter Tselepis, 5101 Abercrombie Drive, commented on the affordable housing proposal at Duggan Plaza. Wade Thommen, 5201 Danens Drive, commented on the affordable housing proposal at Duggan Plaza and how greenspace affected the Brookview Heights development and area values. Elwira Karwowski, 5101 Danens Drive, commented on the affordable housing proposal at Duggan Plaza and how the property belonged to the neighborhood. V.A. CITY MANAGER’S RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY COMMENTS Manager Neal responded to Community Comments made at the last meeting. VI. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED AS AMENDED Member Fischer made a motion, seconded by Member Anderson, approving the consent agenda as amended to remove Items VI.A., Minutes of the Work Session and Regular Meetings of July 21, 2020; VI.E., Traffic Safety Report of June 30, 2020; and, VI.G., Response to Petition for All-Way Stop Control at Beard Avenue and West 57th Street: VI.A. Minutes of the Work Session and Regular Meetings of July 21, 2020 VI.B. Approve payment claims for Check Register Claims Pre-List dated July 23-30, 2020 totaling $1,972,611.31 and Credit Card Transactions dated May 26-June 26, 2020, totaling $43,293.12 VI.C. Accept Property Easements at Pentagon Village Minutes/Edina City Council/August 5, 2020 Page 2 VI.D. Request for Purchase; awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Security Cameras for South Parking Ramp, Pro-Tec Design for $28,697 VI.E. Traffic Safety Report of June 30, 2020 VI.F. Approve Tracy Avenue Wetland Maintenance Agreement with Nine Mile Creek Watershed District VI.G. Response to Petition for All-Way Stop Control at Beard Avenue and West 57th Street VI.H. Approve Amendment and Memorandum to Lease Agreement for Communications Facility in Highlands Park at 5200 Doncaster Way VI.I. Adopt Resolution No. 2020-79; Accepting Sidewalk and Landscaping for The Avidor Residences VI.J. Request for Purchase; awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, 2020 Chevy Bolt Electric Vehicle, Ranger Chevrolet $29,139.20 VI.K. Request for Purchase; awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Bredesen Parking Lot Replacement, Bituminous Roadways for $43,282.78 VI.L. Request for Purchase; awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Park Recycling Containers, Upbeat Site Furnishings for $52,929 Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA: VI.A. MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION AND REGULAR MEETINGS OF JULY 21, 2020 – APPROVED AS AMENDED The Council requested the July 21, 2020 regular meeting minutes reflect that Item VI.I., Rosland Park, was not approved but rather the memo was accepted and staff would meet with neighbors prior to any future meetings. Member Fischer made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to correct motion on Page 2, Item VI.I. to accept staff memo with Council approval of project to occur at a future Council meeting. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. Member Fischer made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to approve minutes of the July 21, 2020, Work Session as presented and Regular Meeting of July 21, 2020, as amended. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VI.E. TRAFFIC SAFETY REPORT OF JUNE 30, 2020 – APPROVED AS AMENDED The Council shared safety concerns that the proposed 8-foot trail not be striped to allow sufficient room for cyclists to pass pedestrians and include signage that pedestrians had priority in shared use of path and cyclists should announce approach. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Anderson, to amend Section A2 of Traffic Safety Report to delete centerline striping and include signage that cyclists yield to pedestrians and announce approach to indicate shared use of path. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, to approve the Traffic Safety Report as amended. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. Minutes/Edina City Council/August 5, 2020 Page 3 VI.G. RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL AT BEARD AVENUE AND WEST 57TH STREET – ACCEPTED AS AMENDED The Council discussed the potential for accidents in the area due to the steep road grade and the creation of a park overlay in areas with a park and recommended installation of an all-way stop at Beard Avenue and West 57th Street. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Anderson, to approve installation of all-way stop control at Beard Avenue and West 57th Street. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD – Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-81: SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR 3451 PARKLAWN AVENUE FOR YORK GARDENS SENIOR LIVING – CONTINUED TO AUGUST 18, 2020 Community Development Director Teague shared that in 2009, the Council approved a rezoning on this site to construct a 76-unit, 4-story addition to the northwest side of the existing 337-unit, 9-story senior housing development at 7500 York Avenue. The applicant, York Gardens Senior Living, was requesting site plan approval to convert existing therapy and office space into three apartments in the 76-unit building. There would be no increase in staffing to accommodate the new apartments and additional parking would not be needed. The applicant provided proof of parking to show parking could be accommodated on site if needed and no exterior modifications would be made to the building or site. Susan Farr, Ebenezer/Fairview, described their proposal to convert the therapy area to assisted living units to allow more residents to move to the area. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:12 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared. Member Fischer made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to extend the public hearing to noon August 12, 2020 and continue consideration of Resolution No. 2020-81 Approving Site Plan at 3451 Parklawn Avenue to the August 18, 2020 meeting. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VII.B. ORDINANCE NO. 2020-10: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING SETBACKS IN THE GREATER SOUTHDALE AREA, BUILDING MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS, REQUIRING AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS, DESIGN EXPERIENCE GUIDELINES, AND TOTAL GARAGE STAFFS REQUIRED – GRANTED FIRST READING Mr. Teague stated the Planning Commission had been considering a zoning ordinance amendment to strengthen the City’s position in acquiring affordable housing by requiring affordable housing on property zoned for commercial uses but allow multifamily housing as a conditionally permitted use. The Council suggested adding the affordable housing text only once for ease of updates, inquired about the role of the HRA versus Council with regard to the policy, and why it had to be included since an affordable housing policy was already in place. City Attorney Knutson advised the policy could not be enforced unless included in ordinance. Mr. Teague explained the policy was included to cover each zoning district and closed a gap for multi-family projects. He said the policy still applied to any zoning or Comprehensive Plan amendment and needed to be updated to reflect the new buy-in amount and escalator. Minutes/Edina City Council/August 5, 2020 Page 4 The Council discussed the proposed escalator and increasing the per door amount to $125,000 as part of second reading balanced against the importance of not deterring development. Mr. Neal suggested adoption of the ordinance regardless of the amount determined so as to not miss out on affordable housing opportunities during this time and secure rights to require affordable housing in the future. Affordable Housing Manager Hawkinson explained how the buy-in amount depended on whether the direction was including units or funds. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:35 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared. Member Fischer left the meeting due to technical difficulties. Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to extend the public hearing to noon August 12, 2020; grant First Reading to Ordinance No. 2020-10 Regarding Setbacks in the Southdale Area, Building Materials, Housing in Commercial Zoning Districts, and Number of Garage Stalls for Single Family Homes; and, continue final action to the August 18, 2020 meeting. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Staunton, Hovland Absent: Fischer Motion carried. Member Fischer returned to the meeting. VIII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-76: APPROVING DRAINAGE RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT VACATION AT 6000 FOX MEADOW LANE – ADOPTED Mr. Millner stated Jennifer Cates of Cates Fine Homes applied for a vacation of the drainage easements of the right-of-way easement at 6000 Fox Meadow Lane and that vacation of easements would be contingent upon the creation of new drainage easements. Member Staunton introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2020-76 Vacating Drainage and Utility Easement at 6000 Fox Meadow Lane. Member Fischer seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland. Motion carried. VIII.B. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-78: APPROVING DRAINAGE RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT VACATION AT 4805 SUNNYSLOPE ROAD – ADOPTED Mr. Millner stated David Berglund applied for a vacation of the drainage easements of the right-of- way easement at 4805 Sunnyslope Road and that vacation of easements would be contingent upon the creation of new drainage easements. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2020-78 vacating drainage and utility easement at 4805 Sunnyslope Road. Member Fischer seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland. Motion carried. Minutes/Edina City Council/August 5, 2020 Page 5 VIII.C. ORDINANCE NO. 2020-09: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ALLOWING TAPROOMS, WINERIES, DISTILLERIES AND COCKTAIL ROOMS IN THE POD-2, PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT – ADOPTED Mr. Teague stated a request had been made by Eric Anderson of CREFIV-CCRP Metro Boulevard Edina LLC to permit distilleries in the POD-2 Zoning District to locate a distillery within the existing office building at 7201 Metro Boulevard. He said the City adopted an ordinance in 2015 to allow, breweries, taprooms, wineries, distilleries, cocktail rooms, and brewpubs in the PID, Planned Industrial District and this request would expand those uses to the POD-2 District including distilleries then said the properties were primarily located in the Cahill Industrial Park, 7550 France Avenue, and at 8050-8100 78th Street West. Member Fischer made a motion to grant Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2020-09 Amending Chapter 36 of the Edina City Code regarding distilleries in the POD-2, Planned Office District 2. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.D. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-74: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WITH VARIANCES FOR 4425 VALLEY VIEW ROAD – ADOPTED Mr. Teague stated DJR Architects was proposing to tear down the existing one-story day-care building at 4425 Valley View Road and construct a new three-story, 21-unit market rate apartment with 32 underground parking stalls. The density proposed was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan/Small Area Plan which limits the density to 30 units per acre for this site. The request required a Conditional Use Permit to allow residential uses within a planned commercial zoning district (PCD-1), building height variance from 2 stories to 3 stories, front setback variance from 36 feet to 16 feet (patio 2 feet), side and rear setback variances from 36 to 20 feet; floor area ratio variance from 1.0 to 1.08; and drive aisle setback variances from 10 to 0 feet. He said the Planning Commission recommended approval of the request and that the Commission added a condition that there be physical protection to the bike lane from vehicles in Valley View Road which had been addressed by the traffic study consultant. Member Staunton introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2020-74 Approving a Conditional Use Permit with Variances to build a 21-unit apartment at 4425 Valley View Road. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.E. RESOLUTION 2020-80: IMPLEMENTING THE 2018 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE – TABLED TO AUGUST 18, 2020 Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, to table consideration of Resolution No. 2020-80 Adopting the 2040 City of Edina Comprehensive Plan Update, and the Comprehensive Sewer Plan, a Compilation of Policy Statements, Goals, Standards, and Maps for Guiding the Overall Development and Redevelopment of the Local Governmental Unit to the August 18, 2020 meeting. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.F. ORDINANCE NO. 2020-11: AMENDMENT TO DIVIDE BUILDING PERMITS INTO TWO CLASSES AND REDUCE PERMISSIBLE HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION IN EACH CLASS – GRANTED FIRST READING Mr. Neal stated Ordinance No. 2020-11 would amend Chapter 10 of the City Code to divide building permits into two classes and establish reduced permissible hours of construction in each class when compared to the current permissible hours. The amendment would use the magnitude of construction as a proxy for the Minutes/Edina City Council/August 5, 2020 Page 6 magnitude of noise created by the project and that projects with smaller valuations were typically smaller in scale and created less disruption and noise than large-scale construction projects. He spoke about staff’s proposed amendment to include projects with a building permit and building values of above or below $50,000 to reduce the days and times in general for noise. The Council spoke about time being outside normal working hours and how to enforce and confirmed the amendment only related to projects with a building permit and would comply by the noise ordinance. The Council requested more information on enforcement and administrative fine protocols for second reading. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, to amend Section 1 of Ordinance No. 2020-11 amending Chapter 10 of the Edina City Code concerning hourly restrictions on certain operations adding building project value of $50,000 or less and building project value of $50,000 or more. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, to grant First Reading of Ordinance No. 2020-11, as amended, amending Chapter 10 of the Edina City Code concerning hourly restrictions on certain operations and continue final action to the August 18, 2020 meeting. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE - Received 1. Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council’s receipt of various correspondence. IX.B. COMMISSION CORRESPONDENCE (MINUTES AND ADVISORY COMMUNICATION) 1. MINUTES: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION, MARCH 10, 2020 2. MINUTES: TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, JUNE 18, 2020 3. MINUTES: HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION, JUNE 23, 2020 4. MINUTES: COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMISSION STATEMENT OF SUPPORT FOR EMERGENCY REGULATION 2020-02 X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE – Received XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received The Council suggested a change in student commissioner appointments to include more students in the process and discussed how meetings could accommodate increased members especially during virtual meetings. Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to direct staff to bring forward an ordinance amendment to allow up to three students commissioners as determined by the commissions. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. XIII. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received XIII. CALENDAR OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AND EVENTS – Received XIV. ADJOURNMENT Minutes/Edina City Council/August 5, 2020 Page 7 Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, to adjourn the meeting at 10:00 p.m. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, August 18, 2020. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the August 5, 2020, meeting available. Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Claims From:Don Uram, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Approve Payment of Claims Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve claims for payment: Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 08.06.20-08.13.20 TOTAL $2,248,605.48 INTRODUCTION: Claim information for approval is attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 08.06.20-08.13.20 TOTAL $2,248,605.48 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 13:34:22R55CKS2LOGIS100 1Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/13/20208/6/2020 - Company Amount 251,952.3901000GENERAL FUND 49,264.8502300POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 9,975.2402500PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 3,900.0003200CITY HALL DEBT SERVICE 900.0003300PIR DEBT SERVICE FUND 115,576.5704000WORKING CAPITAL FUND 13,377.5004100PIR CONSTRUCTION FUND 114.9605100ART CENTER FUND 5,900.8605200GOLF DOME FUND 21,070.6605400GOLF COURSE FUND 7,840.7905500ICE ARENA FUND 536.0005550SPORTS DOME FUND 2,684.9405700EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 16,812.5705750CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 342,588.3205800LIQUOR FUND 602,309.3205900UTILITY FUND 19,962.1205930STORM SEWER FUND 609,413.6606000RISK MGMT ISF 53,459.7206100EQUIPMENT OPERATIONS ISF 9,694.4806200Information Technology ISF 64,066.3406300FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ISFT 20,685.5907400PSTF AGENCY FUND 11,863.4107500MN TASK FORCE 1 FUND 470.5009232CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 14,184.6909248WEST 76TH STREET TIF DISTRICT Report Totals 2,248,605.48 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 1Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451092 8/6/2020 150890 HUEG, KRISTIN 100.00 529698 1288995-REFUND 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 100.00 451093 8/6/2020 140086 ABLE SEEDHOUSE AND BREWERY 250.00 24781 529829 E-12308 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 250.00 451094 8/6/2020 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 2.00 24649 529830 2526002 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 93.40 24649 529830 2526002 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.00 24652 529831 2526534 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 67.93 24652 529831 2526534 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 73.89 24856 529832 2528357 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.00 24869 530002 2528973 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 31.13 24869 530002 2528973 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 55.21 24868 530003 2528978 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 327.56 451095 8/6/2020 129458 ACME TOOLS 469.00 529799 7791005 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 623.98 529800 7791118 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,092.98 451096 8/6/2020 150880 ACRYLIC DESIGN 7,651.00 PLEXIGLASS SHIELDS-ELECTIONS 529642 308995 4635.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COVID-19 7,651.00 451097 8/6/2020 143557 ADIDAS AMERICA INC. 132.88 STAFF HATS 529802 6151043182 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 132.88 451098 8/6/2020 145066 AGGARWAL, KAM 600.00 RENTAL REFUND 529803 1234279-REFUND 5751.4555 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK CENTENNIAL LAKES REVENUE 600.00 451099 8/6/2020 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 299.94 REMOTE WORK SUPPLIES 529643 14CW-J17Q-7PR3 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 30.95 529647 163W-RPP4-HG7Q 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 122.50 BINS FOR PENS-8/11 PRIMARY 529527 199L-PDJQ-WT4T 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 16.99 MAGNET 529649 1GJT-13LQ-XMR3 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 2Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451099 8/6/2020 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES Continued... 140.49 BOARDS AND CHIP STUFF 529648 1MCN-PYRV-PNP9 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 37.62 EVENT SUPPLY 529805 1MTF-WV97-6T19 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 104.00 GLOVES 529804 1NNN-TRHC-4G69 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 1,448.72 YEARLY DRIVES FOR TOWERS 529645 1NNN-TRHC-F66Y 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 58.47 WRISTBANDS 529526 1QQT-P4WQ-FQ1Q 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 58.47-WRISTBANDS 529526 1QQT-P4WQ-FQ1Q 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 58.47 WRISTBANDS 529526 1QQT-P4WQ-FQ1Q 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 35.96 SQUAD PHONE CASE 529644 1V3V-WGV1-4MPC 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 9.10 HAZARDOUS WASTE STICKERS 529528 1W49-6GKV-4QGN 6303.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 9.99 REPLACEMENT SIGN 529646 1YFW-DPFF-R7R1 6102.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 2,314.73 451100 8/6/2020 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC. 358.42 529651 1004829731 6302.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL EXPENSES 220.37 LAUNDRY 529650 1004832787 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 274.84 529652 1004832791 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 195.53 529653 1004834960 5861.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS VERNON OCCUPANCY 248.19 LAUNDRY 529806 1004836494 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,297.35 451101 8/6/2020 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 103.25 RADIO REPAIR 529807 96317 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 103.25 451102 8/6/2020 150876 ANDOR, MIKE 50.00 EHS FOB 529529 FOB REIMBURSMENT 5501.4542 SPECTATOR FEES ICE ARENA REVENUES 50.00 451103 8/6/2020 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 95.00 IRRIGATION REPAIR 529654 97892 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Greenhouse and horticulture 95.00 451104 8/6/2020 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 1,571.90 24756 529835 3430068 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,651.90 24768 529833 3430069 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 106.80 24741 529834 3430070 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,618.90 24783 529836 3430071 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,949.50 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 3Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451105 8/6/2020 118758 ASTLEFORD INTERNATIONAL Continued... 169.85 SHIELD 529530 T489371 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 169.85 451106 8/6/2020 101718 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 75.27 FILTERS 529531 380012055 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 7.08 FILTER 529532 380012440 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 82.35 451107 8/6/2020 150895 BALOW, KORY 75.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIAL 529655 #VAN1 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 75.00 451108 8/6/2020 129624 BARNA GUZY & STEFFEN LTD 1,033.42 EMPLOYMENT LEGAL ADVICE 529656 219212 1170.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES 1,033.42 451109 8/6/2020 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 970.20 PLC BATTERIES FOR SAN LIFTS 529534 P27667036 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 44.95 BATTERY CHARGER 529533 P28523595 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 124.90 CITY CELL PHONE SCREEN REPLACE 529535 RA3074987 6303.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 1,140.05 451110 8/6/2020 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 4.20 24748 529841 101751100 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 40.55 24748 529841 101751100 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 17.05 24806 529839 85121000 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,103.00 529839 85121000 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,265.90 24808 529837 85121300 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 45.55 24737 529838 85143200 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 34.10 24810 529840 85143300 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,386.07 24810 529840 85143300 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,920.00 24867 530004 85179900 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10,816.42 451111 8/6/2020 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC. 190.00 24573 529842 9012 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 182.00 24845 530005 9081 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 273.00 24844 529843 9082 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 645.00 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 4Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451112 8/6/2020 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS Continued... 265.65 OFFICE SUPPLIES 529657 160170 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 265.65 451113 8/6/2020 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 310.00 WAYFIND MATERIAL 529658 920389117 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 310.00 451114 8/6/2020 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 490.12 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 529660 83713409 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,574.50 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 529659 83715296 4635.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES COVID-19 71.77 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 529808 83716944 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,136.39 451115 8/6/2020 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 7.00 24706 529844 171637 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 472.00 24706 529844 171637 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12.25 24658 529845 171657 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 576.00 529845 171657 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.75 24875 530006 171772 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 152.00 530006 171772 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,221.00 451116 8/6/2020 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 6,390.00 SOIL BORINGS 529661 B219615 01457.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Grandview A/Melody Lake A 6,987.50 SOIL BORINGS 529662 B219617 01459.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Creek Knoll A 13,377.50 451117 8/6/2020 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 4.60 24504 529856 1081158784 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 207.91 24504 529856 1081158784 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 24.72 24701 529847 1081161480 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,729.16 24701 529847 1081161480 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 33.35 24799 529849 1081161481 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,289.11 24799 529849 1081161481 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.75 24745 529850 1081161482 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 134.80 24745 529850 1081161482 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 16.58 24720 529848 1081161483 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,849.75 24720 529848 1081161483 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12.65 24798 529852 1081161534 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,259.10 529852 1081161534 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 5Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451117 8/6/2020 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 12.65 24653 529855 1081161535 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,469.82 529855 1081161535 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.75 24730 529851 1081161536 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 134.80 529851 1081161536 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 19.93 24672 529853 1081161537 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,555.55 529853 1081161537 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,497.71 24677 529854 1081161538 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,525.17 24695 529846 1081161539 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.30 25033 530007 1081164194 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 472.50 530007 1081164194 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 18,263.66 451118 8/6/2020 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 2,116.50 24976 530010 1091157775 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 83.10 24960 530009 1091157776 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8,364.90 24990 530008 1091157777 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10,564.50 451119 8/6/2020 100648 BUSINESS ESSENTIALS 474.60 PENS FOR 8/11 PRIMARY ELECTION 529536 OE-549184-1 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 474.60 451120 8/6/2020 148222 CALVARY CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH 75.00 529537 1133937-REFUND 1600.4722.08 SHELTER BUILDING RENT PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 200.00 529537 1133937-REFUND 1000.2065 DEPOSITS PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 275.00 451121 8/6/2020 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 5,063.20 24777 529857 2443106 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 76.50 24742 529858 2443107 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 107.97 24956 530011 2446030 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 234.00 24989 530012 2446036 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,453.25 24989 530012 2446036 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,472.85 24975 530014 2446351 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 409.50 24886 530013 2446352 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 14,817.27 451122 8/6/2020 146909 CARPENTER, DANIEL 2.00 DAN CARPENTER PARKING 529664 JULY 2020 EXPENSE REPORT 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 6Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451122 8/6/2020 146909 CARPENTER, DANIEL Continued... 86.00 DAN CARPENTER EDINA MILEAGE 529663 JUNE-JULY 2020 MILEAGE 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 88.00 451123 8/6/2020 150887 CARROLL, CHARLES 100.00 529665 1281190-REFUND 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 100.00 451124 8/6/2020 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 883.74 POLICE MOBILE PRINTERS 529666 ZHT3211 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 883.74 451125 8/6/2020 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 725.00 REDIE MIX CONCRETE 529668 C2214049 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 442.00 BENCH CONCRETE 529667 C2214050 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 1,167.00 451126 8/6/2020 148217 CHRISTOPHER, SASHA 125.00 CLASS REFUND 529812 GOLF COURSE 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 125.00 451127 8/6/2020 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 65.19 UNIFORMS AND SHOP TOWELS 529669 4056962781 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 52.53 RUG LAUNDERING 529543 4056962892 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 38.70 RENTAL UNIFORM 529539 4056962939 6102.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 31.29 LAUNDRY 529538 4056962941 6303.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 39.41 UNIFORM RENTAL 529541 4056962958 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 22.62 UNIFORM RENTAL 529542 4056962974 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 34.37 UNIFORM RENTAL 529540 4056963015 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 76.75 TOWELS 529813 4057443456 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 360.86 451128 8/6/2020 146472 CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE OF MN 3,290.00 PW CLEANING 529672 I00072177 6303.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 756.00 PW SANITIZING 529671 I00072832 4635.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COVID-19 5,241.00 RAMP CLEANING 529673 I00072837 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 756.00 CITY HALL DISINFE 529670 I00072839 4635.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COVID-19 10,043.00 451129 8/6/2020 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 7Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451129 8/6/2020 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO Continued... 108.00 24765 529859 545126 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 43.00 24780 529860 545127 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 151.00 451130 8/6/2020 120433 COMCAST 67.70 CABLE TV 529544 877210614037302 2-7/2020 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 67.70 451131 8/6/2020 104928 CONCRETE CUTTING & CORING INC. 37.34 IGNITION MODULE 529674 #12108 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 37.34 IGNITION MODULE 529675 15860 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 74.68 451132 8/6/2020 141866 CORNELL, THOMAS 125.93 TOM CORNELL MILEAGE 529796 JAN-JULY 2020 MILEAGE 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 125.93 451133 8/6/2020 120032 CORPORATE MECHANICAL 55,695.00 529676 W43370 6303.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 55,695.00 451134 8/6/2020 142772 CREATIVE ARCADE 750.00 EDINET MAINTENANCE 529677 INV_2020_1178 6202.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT I.T. EXPENSES 750.00 451135 8/6/2020 123653 CROSSTOWN CONCRETE & BRICK PAVING INC. 3,760.00 PAVER REPLACEMENT 529545 7.29.20 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 3,760.00 451136 8/6/2020 146345 CRP/TCC AA II EDINA, LLC 3,500.00 10% ESCROW REFUND 529798 080320 1000.2066 ESCROW DEPOSITS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 3,500.00 451137 8/6/2020 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 313.22 DRINKING WATER AT MAINTENANCE 529678 114-10133502-3- 7/2020 5422.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 313.22 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 8Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451138 8/6/2020 119214 CUSTOM HOSE TECH INC.Continued... 140.53 HOSE ASY, FITTINGS 529546 102359 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 140.53 451139 8/6/2020 118063 DC MANAGEMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 9,722.40 LEAD ABATEMENT 529547 20-02-02 7412.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER PSTF RANGE 8,247.00 LEAD ABATEMENT 529548 20-02-03 7412.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER PSTF RANGE 17,969.40 451140 8/6/2020 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 253.83 RATCHET, CHARGER 529549 10047 6102.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 37.61 BRAKE PAD 529679 10128 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 56.42 PAD AND FUNELS 529550 10806 6102.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 347.86 451141 8/6/2020 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 29.75 2040 COMP PLAN 529681 741325 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 35.70 ORD 2020-01 529680 755803 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 65.45 451142 8/6/2020 105906 EGAN COMPANY 6,738.24 INSURANCE - PED BRIDGE - PEPSI 529551 JC10209213 1322.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 6,738.24 451143 8/6/2020 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 13.14 SHIPPING FOR WARRANTY LIGHT 529682 RP072720-2 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 13.14 451144 8/6/2020 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 55.01 BRAKE KIT 529559 158-036564 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 67.71 BRAKE LINING 529565 1-6462697 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 307.38 ASSY ARMS 529554 1-6471992 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 36.57 LINK 529553 1-6471994 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 313.44 BRAKE ROTOR 529566 1-6475545 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 47.57 POLY V KITS 529561 1-6477623 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 67.36 AXLE SPINDLE NUTS 529562 1-6477680 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 396.67 ROTORS AND PADS 529564 69-389508 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 123.20-CREDIT MEMO 529558 69-389912 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 36.57 LINKS 529555 69-390264 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 154.86 BRAKE LINING, ROTORS 529552 69-390265 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 289.40 BRAKE CALIPERS 529567 69-390417 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 9Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451144 8/6/2020 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY Continued... 193.42 BRAKE ROTORS, PADS 529556 69-390704 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 40.18 V-BELTS 529560 69-390735 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 117.65 BRAKE CALIPER 529563 69-390755 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 36.39 BELTS 529683 69-390977 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 55.01 BRAKE KIT 529557 74-249628 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 2,091.99 451145 8/6/2020 147181 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE, LLC 330.00 24849 529863 1626 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 330.00 24468 529861 E-1608 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 330.00 24850 529862 E1628 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 990.00 451146 8/6/2020 141837 FIRST CHOICE COFFEE SERVICES 217.35 COFFEE 529684 504028 6303.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 217.35 451147 8/6/2020 122414 FORKLIFTS OF MINNESOTA INC. 255.12 CONTRACTED REPAIR 529568 1S7888410 6102.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 250.47 CONTRACTED REPAIR 529569 1S7895770 6102.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 196.65 SCIRROR LIFT INSPECTION 529570 1S7895780 6102.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 702.24 451148 8/6/2020 143036 FREDERICK, NICOLE 18.98 CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 529572 DSW REIMBURSEMENT 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 44.99 CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 529797 EXPRESS REIMBURSEMENT 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 34.97 CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 529573 EXPRESS REIMBURSEMENT 2 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 97.90 CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 529574 EXPRESS REIMBURSEMENT 3 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 9.99 CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 529571 GAP REIMBURSEMENT 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 206.83 451149 8/6/2020 142334 FURTHER 1,001.00 JULY FURTHER INVOICE 529685 008816-7/20 1170.6160 DATA PROCESSING HUMAN RESOURCES 1,001.00 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 10Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451150 8/6/2020 102456 GALLS INC.Continued... 127.56 UNIFORM SHIRTS 529575 BC1157961 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 124.00 NEW OFFICER GEAR 529686 BC1160665 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 251.56 451151 8/6/2020 150888 GINTHER, LESLYE 100.00 529687 1286563-REFUND 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 100.00 451152 8/6/2020 116190 GLOBAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY 1,067.19 529576 116316824 1184.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ELECTIONS 1,067.19 451153 8/6/2020 100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE 545.00 GRAPHICS FOR NEW SQUAD 529577 134748 2340.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DWI FORFEITURE 545.00 451154 8/6/2020 101103 GRAINGER 27.62 SPRAYER 529578 9602163306 6102.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 5.47 SIGN 529579 9602877699 6102.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 34.63 RESPIRATOR, CARTRIDGE 529688 9604715673 6102.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 230.92 BROOMS/HORNET KILLER 529689 9605972299 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 177.00 CALIPER FOR OIL HOSE 529690 9606700160 6102.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 475.64 451155 8/6/2020 120201 GRANICUS INC. 9,397.50 NOVUSAGENDA 529580 129143 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 9,894.00 WEBSTREAMING SERVICE 529580 129143 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 19,291.50 451156 8/6/2020 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC. 90.00 BLACK 529581 4-394855 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION 300.00 BLACK DIRT 529582 4-395673 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 390.00 451157 8/6/2020 100790 HACH COMPANY 292.66 WATER TESTING SUPPLIES 529583 12039307 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 292.66 451158 8/6/2020 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS 25,483.71 AUG HP INVOICE- NONACTIVES 529691 98479254 6002.6043 COBRA INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 11Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451158 8/6/2020 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS Continued... 389,433.05 AUG HP INVOICE-ACTIVES 529692 98504763 6002.6040 HOSPITALIZATION RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 414,916.76 451159 8/6/2020 103085 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVICES 39,991.76 HENNEPIN COUNTY TRUE-UP 529693 1000152449 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 39,991.76 451160 8/6/2020 101503 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY TAX 14,184.69 PROPERTY TAXES 529694 08-116-21 11 009/OCT 15 9248.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS WEST 76TH STREET TIF DISTRICT 14,184.69 451161 8/6/2020 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURING 839.76 FIELD PAINT 529584 0006449-IN 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 55.49 PAINT/STAIN SUPPLIES 529695 03347920 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 895.25 451162 8/6/2020 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 50.40 24746 529865 211613 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 926.00 24779 529864 211614 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 55.20 24965 530018 212557 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,768.00 24977 530017 212558 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 50.40 24961 530016 212559 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,395.30 24991 530015 212560 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,245.30 451163 8/6/2020 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 320.89 CHLORINE, ACID 529696 200724002-ER 5720.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 320.89 451164 8/6/2020 101697 HORIZON GRAPHICS INC 2,145.41 PRINTING EJ GUIDES 529585 36692 1180.6575 PRINTING ELECTION 2,145.41 451165 8/6/2020 142744 HP INC. 570.00 MONITORS FOR PFISHER 529697 9010397952 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 570.00 451166 8/6/2020 150868 HYDROCEPHALUS ASSOCIATION 400.00 529586 1133853-REFUND 1600.4722.09 ROSLAND RENTAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 12Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451166 8/6/2020 150868 HYDROCEPHALUS ASSOCIATION Continued... 400.00 451167 8/6/2020 150882 IBCCES 2,500.00 AUTISM TRAINING 529814 9870 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,500.00 451168 8/6/2020 150893 IMAGE 360 106.04 DARTS BANNERS 529815 1-4460 1262.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION 106.04 451169 8/6/2020 146427 INBOUND BREWCO 92.00 24789 529866 7648 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 192.00 25002 530019 7649 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 92.00 24988 530020 7719 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 376.00 451170 8/6/2020 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 321.20 24760 529868 92240 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 479.20 24788 529867 92242 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 800.40 451171 8/6/2020 143913 JACK PINE BREWERY 158.60 24862 530022 3504 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 165.00 24863 530021 3505 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 323.60 451172 8/6/2020 140123 JACOBS, TRAVIS 130.67 529587 MN-TFL 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 130.67 451173 8/6/2020 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 312.62 FASTENERS, PAINT SUPPLY, BL 529588 6/20-EQUIP OPERATIONS 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 312.62 451174 8/6/2020 102146 JESSEN PRESS INC. 2,915.45 529699 685355 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 2,915.45 451175 8/6/2020 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 13Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451175 8/6/2020 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN Continued... 3,260.10 24782 529870 3106748 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,573.10 24767 529873 3106749 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 76.35 24739 529869 3106750 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 826.55 24755 529871 3106751 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 230.90 24731 529872 3106752 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,187.40 24979 530023 3117602 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 13,154.40 451176 8/6/2020 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 132.40-2474 529874 104547 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4.76-2474 529874 104547 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 53.80-529919 109741 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19-2480 529919 109741 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 29.07 24131 529900 1594027 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,981.90 24131 529900 1594027 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 19.04 24331 529903 1600027 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,240.85 24331 529903 1600027 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 14.28 24519 529875 1604833 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,452.00 24519 529875 1604833 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 15.47 24540 529918 1604834 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 994.21 24540 529918 1604834 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,137.70 24686 529881 160756 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 24633 529917 1609728 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 258.19 24858 529888 1609729 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 24853 529915 1609731 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 257.00 24853 529915 1609731 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 24854 529892 1609733 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 257.00 529892 1609733 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 24662 529894 1609735 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 68.75 529894 1609735 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 11.90 24669 529891 1609736 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,236.00 529891 1609736 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3.57 24676 529893 1609737 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 467.76 529893 1609737 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 16.07 24660 529896 1609738 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,220.00 529896 1609738 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7.14 24840 529895 1609739 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 497.50 529895 1609739 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .69 529901 1609740 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 14Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451176 8/6/2020 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.Continued... 3.57 24665 529897 1609741 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 408.00 529897 1609741 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3.57 24826 529898 1609742 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 480.00 529898 1609742 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4.76 24827 529899 1609743 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 704.00 529899 1609743 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,065.52 24828 529887 1609744 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 29.19 24740 529886 1609745 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,971.65 24689 529885 1609746 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 230.07 24689 529884 1609747 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 413.09 24689 529883 1609748 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 20.18 24713 529916 1609749 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,382.96 24713 529916 1609749 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 14.29 24831 529913 1609750 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 960.00 24831 529913 1609750 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 14.29 24832 529912 1609751 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,760.00 24832 529912 1609751 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 13.09 24833 529911 1609752 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 400.00 24833 529911 1609752 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4.76 24722 529910 1609753 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 409.25 24722 529910 1609753 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 24675 529890 1609754 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 143.94 529890 1609754 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 370.88 24698 529882 1609755 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,530.21 24692 529880 1609757 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,355.15 24699 529889 1609758 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,943.16 24683 529879 1609759 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 504.64 24841 529878 1609760 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 510.78 24842 529877 1609761 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 87.19 24700 529876 1609762 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7.14 24710 529909 1609767 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 345.67 24710 529909 1609767 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 14.29 24717 529904 1609768 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,966.15 24717 529904 1609768 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8.33 24723 529906 1609769 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,433.00 24723 529906 1609769 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 32.14 24843 529907 1609770 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,450.00 24843 529907 1609770 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 24857 529902 1609771 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 15Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451176 8/6/2020 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.Continued... 23.21 24708 529905 1609772 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,580.10 24708 529905 1609772 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7.14 24839 529914 1609773 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 497.50 24839 529914 1609773 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.38 24725 529908 1609774 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 274.00 24725 529908 1609774 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 36,380.32 451177 8/6/2020 150877 JOHNSON, TAMARA 557.00 529589 273-18-5298 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 557.00 451178 8/6/2020 148559 JORGENSEN, JILL 225.00 CLASS CANCELATION 529700 GOLF COURSE 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 225.00 451179 8/6/2020 143544 LADY A LITERARY 295.00 AD SALES COMM. THE TIMES 529701 #35 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 295.00 451180 8/6/2020 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 97.03 MARKING PAINT 529703 9307759412 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 174.02 STAINLESS STEAL HARDWARE 529702 9307762753 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 271.05 451181 8/6/2020 138211 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 194,296.00 Q1 PROP AND CAS PREMIUM 529704 40002474072720 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 194,296.00 451182 8/6/2020 140403 LEOTEK ELECTRONICS USA LLC 3,740.00 LED HEADS 50/HALIFAX SIGNAL 529705 4111705613 1330.6530 REPAIR PARTS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 3,740.00 451183 8/6/2020 149628 Levine, Claudette 225.00 CLASS REFUND 529816 GOLF COURSE 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 225.00 451184 8/6/2020 117026 LIFE-ASSIST INC. 136.00 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 529590 1019106 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 136.00 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 16Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451184 8/6/2020 117026 LIFE-ASSIST INC.Continued... 451185 8/6/2020 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID 69.09 CHIP PROGRAMMER 529708 1067768 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 381.76 CHIP ADAPTER 529707 2000003544 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 200.00 ARSENAL SOFTWARE 529706 2012254 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 370.00 ARSENAL SOFTWARE 529706 2012254 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,069.45 IC PROGRAMMER 529709 2488 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,090.30 451186 8/6/2020 141916 LUPULIN BREWING 301.00 24572 529920 30815 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 111.15 24814 530024 30960 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 111.15 24813 530025 30961 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 523.30 451187 8/6/2020 100869 MARTIN-MCALLISTER 2,200.00 529817 13417 1170.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL HUMAN RESOURCES 2,200.00 451188 8/6/2020 149669 Mastel, Emmy 100.00 529591 1281748-REFUND 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 100.00 451189 8/6/2020 122554 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC. 84.65 OXYGEN - ST. 1 529818 22077596 4635.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES COVID-19 84.65 451190 8/6/2020 119992 MCCARTHY WELL COMPANY 600.00 YEARLY DEEP WELL INSPECTIONS 529710 214905 5422.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 600.00 451191 8/6/2020 101483 MENARDS 90.73 PAINT SUPPLIES 529713 021324 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 147.46 WORKSHOP SUPPLIES 529712 18861 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 394.70 SUPPLIES 529594 20495 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 54.19 50TH SUPPLIES 529595 20773 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 5.91 EAST NETTING 529596 20856 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 743.91 DEHUMIDIFIERS FOR WELL HOUSE 529592 20877 5912.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL HOUSES 16.36 DRILL BITS 529593 20885 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 11.06 PLUMBING PARTS 529714 21239 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 17Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451191 8/6/2020 101483 MENARDS Continued... 54.90 529597 21346 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 71.83 GENERAL SUPPLIES 529711 21431 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 35.94 BATTERIES 529715 21549 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,626.99 451192 8/6/2020 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 72.17 MOULDING 529717 518917 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 63.89 SENSORS 529719 519138 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES .72 NUT 529720 519541 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 35.55 SLEEVE 529718 520124 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 37.76 SLEEVE 529598 520128 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 102.99 SLEEVE 529716 520129 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 126.32 SPINDLE END 529599 520147 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 439.40 451193 8/6/2020 150894 MICHELS CORPORATION 3,099.64 SERVICE DAMAGED 529721 20-1299A37 05586.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS West 58th Street 3,099.64 451194 8/6/2020 127639 MIDWAY FORD 1,378.95 529600 237300 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 1,378.95 451195 8/6/2020 150871 MINNEAPOLIS WINDOW SHADE CO 388.00 SHADES 529722 64747 5553.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 388.00 451196 8/6/2020 136248 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 391.14 CONTROL ARMS 529723 P26956 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 391.14 451197 8/6/2020 113638 MINNESOTA NATIVE LANDSCAPES INC. 5,000.00 BREDESEN GRANT WORK 529601 25101 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 5,000.00 451198 8/6/2020 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 53.02 POST CARD FOR ADDISON NEW SFD 529602 30022 1495.6575 PRINTING INSPECTIONS 106.04 POST CARD FOR ADDISON NEW SFD 529603 30023 1495.6575 PRINTING INSPECTIONS 159.06 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 18Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451199 8/6/2020 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC Continued... 65.25 24791 529922 15237 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 182.25 24981 530027 15361 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 119.00 24790 529921 E-15238 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 168.75 24995 530026 E-15362 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 535.25 451200 8/6/2020 122019 MOORE CREATIVE TALENT, INC. 1,380.00 WOONERF PSA ACTORS 529724 146550 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 1,380.00 451201 8/6/2020 149708 MOORE, ELIZABETH 35.00 526086 PARKS & REC REFUND 1600.4390.74 PICKLEBALL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 35.00 451202 8/6/2020 100920 NAPA AUTO PARTS 44.38 V-BELT 529604 2122-621225 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 44.38 451203 8/6/2020 127547 NEAL, SCOTT H. 93.38 NEAL CELL PHONE JUNE 2020 529725 4062982601 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION 93.38 451204 8/6/2020 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 4.00 24664 529924 159498 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 208.00 529924 159498 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 24.00 24712 529923 159499 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,208.00 24712 529923 159499 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,444.00 451205 8/6/2020 115616 NORTH IMAGE APPAREL INC. 70.00 UNIFORM 529605 NIA14315 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 70.00 451206 8/6/2020 117830 NORTHLAND BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. 2,932.60 529606 IN99499 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,932.60 451207 8/6/2020 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES 28.74 529607 W20040574 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 19Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451207 8/6/2020 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES Continued... 57.48 529607 W20040574 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 86.22 529607 W20040574 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 201.18 529607 W20040574 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 316.14 529607 W20040574 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 57.48 529607 W20040574 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 114.96 529607 W20040574 5410.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 129.33 529607 W20040574 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 57.48 529607 W20040574 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 86.22 529607 W20040574 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 86.22 529607 W20040574 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 129.33 529607 W20040574 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 1,784.88 529607 W20040574 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 28.74 529607 W20040574 6202.6188 TELEPHONE I.T. EXPENSES 28.74 529607 W20040574 6202.6188 TELEPHONE I.T. EXPENSES 86.22 529607 W20040574 6202.6188 TELEPHONE I.T. EXPENSES 3,279.36 451208 8/6/2020 141965 OMNI BREWING COMPANY LLC 241.00 24816 529926 7649 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 347.00 24817 529925 E7650 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 588.00 451209 8/6/2020 101659 ORKIN 30.00 WELL 3 PEST 529740 195863348 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 30.00 WELL 5 PEST APRIL 529735 195863349 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 30.00 WELL 7 PEST 529733 195863350 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 30.00 WELL 8 APRIL PEST 529739 195863351 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 30.00 WELL 9 PEST 529745 195863352 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 30.00 WELL 15 APRIL PEST 529742 195863353 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 30.00 WELL 16 PEST APRIL 529744 195863354 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 30.00 WELL 17 PAMELA PEST 529743 195863355 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 30.00 WELL 18 APRIL PEST 529747 195863356 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 30.00 WELL 19 PEST APRIL 529746 195863357 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 30.00 WELL 20 APEIL PEST 529749 195863358 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 45.00 WELL 2 COM CTR APRIL PEST 529750 195863359 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 45.00 WELL 3 PEST APRIL 529748 195863360 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 30.00 TRT 4 APRIL PEST 529754 195863361 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 60.00 DANEENS 6 APRIL PEST 529741 195863362 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 30.00 DUBLIN WELL PEST 529738 195863470 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 30.00 WELL 4 APRIL 529736 195863471 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 20Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451209 8/6/2020 101659 ORKIN Continued... 149.47 CITY HALL PEST 529734 198271712 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 149.47 CITY HALL 529737 199394427 6302.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL EXPENSES 32.10 PAMELA ATH PEST 529727 199394898 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 30.00 WELL 2 PEST 529728 199395161 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 30.00 WELL 3 JULY PEST 529756 199395162 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 30.00 WELL5 PEST 529731 199395163 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 30.00 WELL7 PEST 529732 199395164 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 30.00 WELL15 PEST 529730 199395167 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 30.00 WELL 17 PEST 529729 199395169 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 30.00 WELL18 JULY PEST 529755 199395170 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 45.00 TRT 2 JULY PEST 529751 199395173 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 45.00 TRT 3 JULY PEST 529752 199395174 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 45.00 TRT 4 JULY PEST 529753 199395175 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 60.00 DANEENS 6 JULY PEST 529757 199395176 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 30.00 WELL 4 JULY PEST 529758 199395278 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 150.00 VV TOWER PEST 529759 205044016 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,486.04 451210 8/6/2020 129485 PAPCO INC. 62.72 CLEANING SUPPLIES 529608 216902-1 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 197.79 CLEANING SUPPLIES 529609 217318 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 260.51 451211 8/6/2020 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 13.75 24509 529930 96085 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,064.90 24509 529930 96085 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7.00 24310 529931 96100 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 342.00 24310 529931 96100 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10.00 24659 529928 96905 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 874.70 529928 96905 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4.50 24682 529929 96916 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 203.70 24682 529929 96916 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7.00 24707 529927 96929 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 373.70 24707 529927 96929 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8.75 24876 530029 97601 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 549.00 530029 97601 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 11.25 25026 530028 97606 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,071.00 530028 97606 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,541.25 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 21Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451212 8/6/2020 133047 PENTAGON NORTH LLC Continued... 1,750.00 529610 36-048:2 05585.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 77th St & Computer Ave 2,102.35 529610 36-048:2 03516.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 77th St & Computer Ave 2,337.80 529610 36-048:2 05585.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 77th St & Computer Ave 1,000.00 529610 36-048:2 04453.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 77th St & Computer Ave 7,190.15 451213 8/6/2020 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 466.59 WATER AND SODA 529611 85137706 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 466.59 451214 8/6/2020 149249 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING 397.00 24607 529932 24462 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 308.50 24796 529934 24736 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 308.50 24794 529935 24737 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 308.50 24795 529933 24738 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,322.50 451215 8/6/2020 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 4.76 24558 529936 6065574 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 282.60 24558 529936 6065574 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 24743 529943 6069026 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 77.15 24743 529943 6069026 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 11.90 24718 529942 6069027 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,116.85 24718 529942 6069027 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 173.39 24733 529939 6069029 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 819.89 24693 529938 6069030 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,266.85 24678 529937 6069031 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7.14 24670 529940 6069032 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 487.00 529940 6069032 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7.14 24654 529941 6069033 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 467.20 529941 6069033 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,723.06 451216 8/6/2020 150883 PLEDGE PARTY TEAM 250.00 CLP 7.29.2020 CHILD CONCERT 529819 CLP SUMMER CONCERT 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 250.00 451217 8/6/2020 150878 POFAHL, TANJA 8.28 529612 1257351.2-REFUN 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 22Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451217 8/6/2020 150878 POFAHL, TANJA Continued... D 110.00 529612 1257351.2-REFUN D 1600.4722.08 SHELTER BUILDING RENT PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 118.28 451218 8/6/2020 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 1,333.34 F/W DIRECTORY POSTAGE 529760 7.22.20 1600.6235 POSTAGE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 1,333.33 F/W DIRECTORY POSTAGE 529760 7.22.20 5410.6235 POSTAGE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,333.33 F/W DIRECTORY POSTAGE 529760 7.22.20 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 4,000.00 451219 8/6/2020 138292 PRECISE IRRIGATION 1,008.23 IRRIGATION REPAIR 529761 4134 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 2,040.92 PROMENADE MAIN LINE BREAK 529762 4241 5765.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROMENADE EXPENSES 3,049.15 451220 8/6/2020 125979 PRECISE MRM LLC 150.00 MOWING DATA 529763 200-1026917 1640.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 150.00 451221 8/6/2020 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 407.43 LINERS,TOWELS 529613 158583 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 407.43 451222 8/6/2020 143618 PRYES BREWING COMPANY 644.00 24787 529944 I-12468 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 644.00 451223 8/6/2020 112097 PUMP & METER SERVICE INC. 205.00 FUEL SYSTEM COVER 529614 32474-1 6102.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 205.00 451224 8/6/2020 123078 QUALIFIED LABORATORIES INC. 695.00 BRAE ICE COVID 19 STANDS SANT 529764 58761 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 20.00 HAND SANITIZER DISPENSERS 529615 58762 4635.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES COVID-19 20.00-HAND SANITIZER DISPENSERS 529615 58762 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 20.00 HAND SANITIZER DISPENSERS 529615 58762 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 4.00 HAND SANITIZER DISPENSERS 529615 58762 5553.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 719.00 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 23Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451225 8/6/2020 138267 QUALITY LOCKSMITH SERVICE Continued... 283.11 50TH OFFICE DOOR REPAIR 529765 QLS18154 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 283.11 451226 8/6/2020 133091 RANGE SERVANT AMERICA INC. 850.00 RANGE KEYS 529766 87588 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 850.00 451227 8/6/2020 138298 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION COMPANY INC. 353.00 24866 529945 K-99173281 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 353.00 451228 8/6/2020 125936 REINDERS INC. 2,438.47 HERBICIDE AND PESTICIDE 529616 3072676-00 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 147.31 FUNGICIDE 529617 3072676-01 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 11.54-CREDIT 529618 3072904-00 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 30.84 FERTILIZER 529619 3072905-00 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 2,605.08 451229 8/6/2020 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 345.85 ST. 1 PLUMBING REPAIRS 529620 80033 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 345.85 451230 8/6/2020 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 18.94 TRAILER PLUG 529621 1928366336 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 18.94 451231 8/6/2020 127774 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY 1.50 24667 529946 20-12674 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 108.00 529946 20-12674 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 109.50 451232 8/6/2020 150891 RYAN, MARGARET 100.00 529767 1281759-REFUND 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 100.00 451233 8/6/2020 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 990.00 NORTH RAMP ELE SERVICE 529768 8105387420 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 990.00 451234 8/6/2020 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 24Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451234 8/6/2020 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO.Continued... 238.09 PAINT 529622 8384-9 5911.6532 PAINT WELL PUMPS 238.09 451235 8/6/2020 120784 SIGN PRO 134.74 PADDLEBOAT SIGNS 529769 15372 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 526.55 SIGNS 529770 15385 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 661.29 451236 8/6/2020 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 1,520.74 GROWTH REGULATOR FOR FWYS/FALL 529771 101438223-001 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 22.12 IRRIGATION PARTS 529773 101936780-001 1642.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIELD MAINTENANCE 94.17 WEED SPRAY 529772 101946499-001 1643.6546 WEED SPRAY Greenhouse and horticulture 236.73 529820 102029691-001 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,873.76 451237 8/6/2020 147020 SKECHERS USA 52.15 MERCHANDISE 529821 93343876 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 52.15 451238 8/6/2020 132195 SMALL LOT MN 12.30 24668 529948 MN37331 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 768.24 529948 MN37331 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12.30 24715 529947 MN37332 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 400.20 24715 529947 MN37332 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,193.04 451239 8/6/2020 146751 SMITH ENGINEERING INC 260.00 WEST WATER SOFTNERS 529774 218768 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 260.00 451240 8/6/2020 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 37.03 RATCHET 529623 ARV/44566300 6102.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 37.03 451241 8/6/2020 150892 SOLAR SOLUTIONS INC 425.00 529822 11545 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 425.00 451242 8/6/2020 101000 SOULO COMMUNICATIONS 65.77 BUS CARDS 529624 111211 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 25Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451242 8/6/2020 101000 SOULO COMMUNICATIONS Continued... 65.77 451243 8/6/2020 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS .80 24657 529957 1977277 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 160.00 529957 1977277 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 32.00 24430 529955 1977278 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,480.00 529955 1977278 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 9.60 24655 529956 1977279 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 520.00 529956 1977279 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3.27 24807 529959 1977280 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 756.00 529959 1977280 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12.00 24803 529958 1977281 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 800.00 529958 1977281 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 20.80 24804 529954 1977282 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,050.00 529954 1977282 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3.20 24671 529960 1977283 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 584.35 529960 1977283 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12.80 24805 529961 1977284 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,679.25 529961 1977284 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .93 24812 529964 1977287 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 224.00 24812 529964 1977287 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6.40 24694 529963 1977290 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,339.50 24694 529963 1977290 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.60 24716 529949 1977292 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 72.00 24716 529949 1977292 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4.80 24704 529950 1977293 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,352.00 24704 529950 1977293 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 32.00 24431 529953 1977294 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,480.00 24431 529953 1977294 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 20.80 24703 529952 1977295 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,050.00 24703 529952 1977295 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4.07 24811 529951 1977296 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 900.00 24811 529951 1977296 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 19.20 529962 1978657 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .80 24885 530034 1979770 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 80.00 530034 1979770 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6.40 24874 530031 1979771 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,216.00 530031 1979771 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6.40 24873 530033 1979772 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 26Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451243 8/6/2020 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Continued... 304.00 530033 1979772 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4.80 24889 530030 1979773 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,254.45 530030 1979773 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .80 25040 530032 1979774 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 112.00 530032 1979774 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 22,617.02 451244 8/6/2020 100181 SPEEDY KEYS 210.00 RE KEY DOORS SQUAD 529625 81118 6102.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 210.00 451245 8/6/2020 118682 SPRINT 200.00 529775 LCI-339816 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 200.00 451246 8/6/2020 146960 STACKED DECK BREWING 120.00 24776 529965 1030 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 120.00 451247 8/6/2020 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 132.00 24784 529967 35162 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 99.00 24770 529966 35163 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 60.00 24757 529968 35164 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 291.00 451248 8/6/2020 102786 STOP STICK LTD 483.50 STOP STICK SET 529823 0018170-IN 2340.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DWI FORFEITURE 483.50 451249 8/6/2020 101015 STREICHERS 51.00 SWAT GEAR 529627 I1440493 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 21.99 SWAT GEAR 529626 I1442432 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 252.96 SWAT GEAR 529776 I1443746 1401.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM 55.99 SWAT GEAR 529824 I1443885 1401.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM 381.94 451250 8/6/2020 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 413.97 PANEL 529628 59023 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 105.46 BELT, TENSIONER 529629 66105 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 519.43 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 27Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451250 8/6/2020 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Continued... 451251 8/6/2020 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 150.82 TIRE 529777 10171646 6102.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 150.82 451252 8/6/2020 140148 SUMMIT COMPANIES 213.75 RPZ TEST WELL9 529630 1538179 5912.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS WELL HOUSES 213.75 451253 8/6/2020 133553 TACTICAL SOLUTIONS 150.00 LASER HOLSTERS 529631 7993 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 451254 8/6/2020 141589 TARGETSOLUTIONS LEARNING LLC 4,611.96 MEMBERSHIP/MAINTENANCE 529778 TSINV0000003345 8 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 4,611.96 451255 8/6/2020 122794 TENNANT SALES AND SERVICE COMPANY 554.13 CONTRACTED REPAIR 529779 917229844 6102.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 163.95 TENET SWEEPER REPAIR 529780 917229845 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 718.08 451256 8/6/2020 150844 TENVOORDE FORD INC 37,113.56 NEW DWI SQUAD 529632 158505 2340.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DWI FORFEITURE 37,113.56 451257 8/6/2020 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 72.14 CABLE 529633 52403-00 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 72.14 451258 8/6/2020 150881 THE LIFEGUARD STORE 3,790.00 HENN CO. GRANT- LIFE VESTS 529825 INV670077 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 3,790.00 451259 8/6/2020 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 219.00 PLANNING COMMISSION 529781 M25774 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 219.00 451260 8/6/2020 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 28Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451260 8/6/2020 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES Continued... 184.49 COPIER 529634 5011234187 7410.6575 PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION 184.49 451261 8/6/2020 136022 TRI-K SPORTS 22.96 RANGER OIL CHANGE KIT 529635 19120 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 197.00 RANGER OIL CHANGE KIT 529635 19120 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 219.96 451262 8/6/2020 101403 TRUCK BODIES & EQUIP INTL INC 215.26 FENDER, MOUNTING BRKT 529782 LC00065738 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 215.26 451263 8/6/2020 102488 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 100.00 POSTAGE 529783 08052973-7/2020 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 500.00 POSTAGE 529783 08052973-7/2020 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 400.00 POSTAGE 529783 08052973-7/2020 6303.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 1,000.00 451264 8/6/2020 120750 UNITED STATES TREASURY 200.90 2020 PCORI FEE 529222 QUARTERLY FED EXCISE TAX 6002.6040 HOSPITALIZATION RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 200.90 451265 8/6/2020 103048 US BANK 400.00 2019A PAYING AGENT FEE 529636 5779276 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 400.00 451266 8/6/2020 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 34.66 529784 546859-00 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 4.18 529785 546860-00 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 38.84 451267 8/6/2020 144209 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 90.00 24637 529969 1816 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 175.50 24848 529971 1843 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 175.50 24847 529972 1844 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 171.00 24846 529970 1845 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 612.00 451268 8/6/2020 150885 VERIZON WIRELESS-VSAT 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 29Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451268 8/6/2020 150885 VERIZON WIRELESS-VSAT Continued... 90.00 529786 200180165-91093 880 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 90.00 451269 8/6/2020 101064 VESSCO INC. 267.05 CHEMICAL FEED PARTS 529637 80704 5912.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL HOUSES 267.05 451270 8/6/2020 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 19.66 BLADES 529787 S003824327.001 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 222.16 LIGHTING SUPPLIES 529788 S003833504.001 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 241.82 451271 8/6/2020 119454 VINOCOPIA 2.50 24370 529981 0260109-IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 167.75 24370 529981 0260109-IN 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3.75 24836 529977 260891 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 312.00 529977 260891 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.25 24705 529979 260896-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 104.00 24705 529979 260896-IN 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 181.75 24855 529975 260898 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 153.25 24680 529976 260899 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,409.50 24837 529974 260900 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 260.50 24835 529973 260901 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8.75 24747 530035 260924-IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 287.75 24747 530035 260924-IN 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.00 24838 529980 260925-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 496.00 24838 529980 260925-IN 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.50 24834 529978 260926-IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 256.75 24834 529978 260926-IN 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,653.00 451272 8/6/2020 120725 WARNERS STELLIAN 32.25 REPAIR PARTS 529826 INV-52975 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 32.25 451273 8/6/2020 132751 WARNING LITES OF MN 210.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL WMB 529638 220542 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 210.00 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 30Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451274 8/6/2020 150884 WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT Continued... 69.00 529789 11890381 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 69.00 451275 8/6/2020 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICES INC. 597.30 LEAK LOCATE 529639 10589 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 597.30 451276 8/6/2020 149124 Werry, Dan 597.00 CLASS REFUNDS 529827 GOLF COURSE 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 597.00 451277 8/6/2020 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 13.20 24714 529983 147709 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 748.00 24714 529983 147709 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 11.55 24690 529982 147710 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 846.00 24690 529982 147710 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 9.90 24666 529984 147711 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 434.40 529984 147711 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,063.05 451278 8/6/2020 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 11.90 23861 529994 7288842 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,160.00 23861 529994 7288842 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 15.48 24820 529996 7292653 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,290.00 24820 529996 7292653 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,502.38 24823 529987 7292852 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.95 24661 529989 7292854 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 250.00 529989 7292854 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3.57 24825 529990 7292855 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,250.00 529990 7292855 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,361.37 24685 529986 7292856 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 48.38 24738 529985 7292857 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 815.47 24824 529988 7292858 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.38 24749 529995 7292859 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 46.00 24749 529995 7292859 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 31.55 24709 529993 7292860 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,670.00 24709 529993 7292860 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 27.38 24821 529992 7292861 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,032.00 24821 529992 7292861 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8.67-2479 529991 733539 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 31Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451278 8/6/2020 101312 WINE MERCHANTS Continued... 22,515.14 451279 8/6/2020 144412 WINEBOW 1.75 24721 529997 MN00081643 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 180.00 24721 529997 MN00081643 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.75 24711 529998 MN00081644 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 80.00 24711 529998 MN00081644 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.75 24880 530037 MN00081914 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 84.00 530037 MN00081914 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3.50 24892 530038 MN00081915 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 300.00 530038 MN00081915 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 303.50 24916 530036 MN00081937 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 956.25 451280 8/6/2020 130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 41.56-CREDIT ON POINTS PROGRAM 529790 64003127 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 274.19 SPRAY ADJUVENT 529828 64010888 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 232.63 451281 8/6/2020 124503 WINSUPPLY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 79.61 TOWER REPAIRS 529791 197123 01 7413.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF FIRE TOWER 79.61 451282 8/6/2020 148067 WITLINGO INC. 250.00 WITLINGO SUBSCRIPTION 529792 INV-COE-072020 6202.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT I.T. EXPENSES 250.00 451283 8/6/2020 142220 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY 281.10 24574 529999 2328 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 59.70 24758 530001 2338 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 436.80 24771 530000 2340 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 777.60 451284 8/6/2020 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 619.20 529640 R-015878-000-2 4614.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Asset Mgmt Software and Equip 412.80 529640 R-015878-000-2 4615.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Asst Mgmt SW & Equip - Storm 4,172.50 TRAFFIC STUDY 529794 R-016166-000-2 4422.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES 8,134.25 529793 R-016172-000-2 07167.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN France Ave Sdwlk -69toParklawn 13,338.75 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 32Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451285 8/6/2020 130618 YOUNGSTEDTS COLLISION CENTER Continued... 270.00 CONTRACTED REPAIR 529641 20814 6102.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 270.00 451286 8/6/2020 136192 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION 92.98 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 529795 3098495 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 92.98 451287 8/13/2020 120831 1ST SCRIBE INC. - PERRILL 425.00 ROWAY 530074 252015 1263.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENVIRONMENT 425.00 451288 8/13/2020 150961 20176WY-43, LLC 2.89 530225 00124536-020129 8005 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 2.89 451289 8/13/2020 105696 3CMA 99.00 COMMUNICATIONS JOB POST 530075 3CMA-2020 1170.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL HUMAN RESOURCES 99.00 451290 8/13/2020 100612 A.M. LEONARD 204.67 HORT. SUPPLIES 530228 CI20018995 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 40.59 BLOWER 530227 CI20042595 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 245.26 451291 8/13/2020 140086 ABLE SEEDHOUSE AND BREWERY 179.00 25184 530404 12371 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 278.00 25233 530403 E-12370 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 457.00 451292 8/13/2020 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 893.06 DOOR, HINGE 530076 0164310-IN 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 893.06 451293 8/13/2020 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 2.00 24870 530405 2528982 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 133.03 24870 530405 2528982 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.00 25080 530229 2531368 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 61.14 25080 530229 2531368 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 198.17 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 33Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451293 8/13/2020 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY Continued... 451294 8/13/2020 129458 ACME TOOLS 142.92 MULTI TOOL 530077 7795363 6102.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 142.92 451295 8/13/2020 143557 ADIDAS AMERICA INC. 133.73 STAFF HATS 530230 6151122125 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 133.73 451296 8/13/2020 150948 AIKEN, FRANK 91.49 530212 00092048-029045 7130 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 91.49 451297 8/13/2020 139129 ALERUS RETIREMENT AND BENEFITS 202.00 JULY ALERUS INVOICE 530556 C696719 1170.6160 DATA PROCESSING HUMAN RESOURCES 202.00 451298 8/13/2020 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 145.28 MONTHLY FIRE EXTINGUISHER INSP 530078 179876 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 145.28 451299 8/13/2020 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 11.99 WRIST PAD -- BIUNNO 530381 11XK-H63C-T6C4 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 32.06 PHONE CABLE 530358 11XK-H63C-WCJG 6102.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 36.94 PAPER DISPENSER 530361 16G7-KHCM-NAKG 6102.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 21.98 SCREEN PROTECTOR 530359 174N-YTFC-LDG9 6102.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 38.47 530086 17CL-GW7T-4L47 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 118.50 GLOVES 530235 1CWC-HX37-4GCP 4636.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES Fire Health Grant - COVID-19 66.96 WRIST BANDS 530085 1J4F-NHTH-DHQV 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 39.94 PHONE CASE FOR HECKERT 530557 1J4F-NHTH-HQ9F 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 10.99 FACE COVERING 530084 1MCN-PYRV-GDDY 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 66.18 FACE COVERING 530083 1MKD-TLYW-GDPP 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 47.99 TABLET HOLDER 530079 1MKD-TLYW-MQWG 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 17.99 BD DISKS 530079 1MKD-TLYW-MQWG 6202.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES I.T. EXPENSES 99.99 HEADSET 530232 1NFV-N76T-MKPD 6102.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 49.99 KEYBOARD AND MOUSE 530082 1NKX-N6C1-P133 6202.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES I.T. EXPENSES 72.74 530081 1PFJ-Q9FX-7NVD 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 149.96 MACBOOK BACKUP DRIVE 530080 1PRP-3FXW-9K7Q 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 125.00 WILL BE REIMBURSED BY USSS 530231 1TVV-617WX-73JK 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 34Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451299 8/13/2020 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES Continued... 77.45 FIRST AIDE SUPPLIES 530233 1TW4-QVW6-HV3G 5760.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 97.44 CURTAIN RODS FOR CLASSROOM 1 530234 1YDR-VVHG-GDX3 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 1,182.56 451300 8/13/2020 114799 APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SERVICES INC. 420.00 ENG 20-3 CONST OVERS 530236 002621 04449.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Natural Areas Maintenance 420.00 451301 8/13/2020 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 166.50 IRRIGATION REPAIR 70TH ST 530237 97963 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 166.50 451302 8/13/2020 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 2,019.15 24980 530410 3431319 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,456.60 24994 530406 3431320 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,081.20 25008 530408 3431321 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 66.70 25072 530409 3431322 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 106.80 24955 530407 3431323 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,730.45 451303 8/13/2020 150938 ASSAD, SHEILA 152.54 530202 00124630-020370 9004 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 152.54 451304 8/13/2020 100637 AUTOMOBILE SERVICE CO. 159.95 CONTRACTED REPAIR 530087 4010 6102.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 159.95 451305 8/13/2020 102709 BDS LAUNDRY SYSTEMS 259.00 LAUNDRY 530573 V400830 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 259.00 451306 8/13/2020 151013 BELANGER, DONNA 29.42 517545 00088696-034112 5008 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET Supplier 147084 BELANGER, CHARLES 29.42 451307 8/13/2020 150932 BELL, BENJAMIN 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 35Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451307 8/13/2020 150932 BELL, BENJAMIN Continued... 31.55 530196 00100154-034301 3009 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 31.55 451308 8/13/2020 150984 BELL, MATTHEW 30.42 530558 EDINA AMBULANCE REFUND 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 30.42 451309 8/13/2020 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 2.13 24966 530415 101783100 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 27.00 530415 101783100 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4.23 24952 530412 101783200 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 33.50 24952 530412 101783200 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.55 24927 530413 85200700 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 88.00 24927 530413 85200700 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3.10 25048 530416 85242500 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 304.40 530416 85242500 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 13.95 25051 530414 85243100 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,139.40 25051 530414 85243100 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 17.05 25050 530411 85243600 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,828.70 25050 530411 85243600 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,463.01 451310 8/13/2020 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 687.71 LAWN CARE 530238 154600 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 687.71 451311 8/13/2020 101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER 162.08 MAYOR'S COMMENDATIONS 530239 080320 1100.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY COUNCIL 162.08 451312 8/13/2020 150958 BENNETT, JAMES 24.46 530222 00116569-020346 8005 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 24.46 451313 8/13/2020 130569 BINTNER, ROSS 109.25 530240 JUNE-JULY 2020 MILEAGE 1263.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENVIRONMENT 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 36Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451313 8/13/2020 130569 BINTNER, ROSS Continued... 109.25 451314 8/13/2020 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC. 1,320.00 FINAL PAY 530088 FINAL PAYMENT 07150.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Lincoln Trail 1,320.00 451315 8/13/2020 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC. 189.00 25012 530418 9155 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 252.00 24997 530417 9156 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 441.00 451316 8/13/2020 125268 BLUE COMPACTOR SERVICES, LLC 386.00 TRASH COMPACTOR RENTAL 530394 AUG2020-4 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 386.00 451317 8/13/2020 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC. 8,022.50 CC TOWER INSPECTIONS 530089 0254055 05570.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS General Rehab - Water 15,776.08 530241 0254409 01267.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN MSA Maintenance Projects 23,798.58 451318 8/13/2020 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 1,284.95 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 530090 83720480 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 676.00 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 530091 83722185 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 47.48 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 530242 83724006 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,008.43 451319 8/13/2020 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 1.75 24924 530420 171771 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 106.00 24924 530420 171771 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 333.25 24898 530419 171773 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.75 25108 530421 171920 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 176.00 25108 530421 171920 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3.50 25086 530422 171921 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 311.00 530422 171921 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 933.25 451320 8/13/2020 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 11,833.47 CONTRACTED REPAIR 530092 111737 6102.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 11,833.47 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 37Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451321 8/13/2020 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC Continued... 470.50 NORTH RAMP - ENVIRONMENTAL 530243 B219395 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 470.50 451322 8/13/2020 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 18.40 25023 530432 1081164100 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 811.35 25023 530432 1081164100 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 18.40 24941 530429 1081164101 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,523.13 24941 530429 1081164101 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.15 24951 530430 1081164102 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 28.59 24951 530430 1081164102 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 13.80 24920 530431 1081164103 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,009.99 24920 530431 1081164103 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 13.80 24890 530424 1081164195 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,706.89 530424 1081164195 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6.90 24871 530423 1081164196 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 692.00 530423 1081164196 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 474.80 25054 530427 1081164197 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,075.90 24914 530428 1081164198 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,260.15 25022 530426 1081164199 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,840.93 24894 530425 1081164200 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.37 25263 530585 1081167369 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 666.00 25263 530585 1081167369 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12.65 25235 530588 1081167370 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 880.00 25235 530588 1081167370 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.75 25104 530587 1081167371 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 552.00 25104 530587 1081167371 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3.45 25120 530586 1081167372 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,138.80 25120 530586 1081167372 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 18,760.20 451323 8/13/2020 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 3,000.45 25181 530436 1091159947 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 124.60-2442 530433 R09304341 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 571.20-2441 530434 R09304342 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 18.40-2461 530435 R09304989 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,286.25 451324 8/13/2020 121118 BRUESKE, JEFFREY 200.00 RETURN TO CLP - 1.17 CONCERT 530244 CLP 081720 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 200.00 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 38Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451324 8/13/2020 121118 BRUESKE, JEFFREY Continued... 451325 8/13/2020 121118 BRUESKE, JEFFREY 200.00 RETURN TO CLP 8.31 CONCERT 530245 CLP 083120 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 200.00 451326 8/13/2020 100648 BUSINESS ESSENTIALS 65.40 530247 WO-1069923-1 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 157.24 SUPPLIES 530093 WO-1081478-1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 66.50 SUPPLIES 530246 WO-1081894-1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 289.14 451327 8/13/2020 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 71.98 24948 530438 2446029 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 175.50 24937 530437 2446035 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,421.95 24937 530437 2446035 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 326.20 25074 530439 2447230 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 454.12-2489 530444 2448748 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,336.30 25196 530440 2448757 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 104.50 25162 530441 2448760 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,022.90 25180 530443 2448762 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 14.00 25156 530442 2448764 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10,019.21 451328 8/13/2020 149346 Carlson, Catherine 175.00 524636 PARKS & REC REFUND 1600.4390.31 TRAVELIN TEENS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 175.00 451329 8/13/2020 150946 CASPERSEN, DAVID 94.63 530210 00091601-016500 4007 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 94.63 451330 8/13/2020 150959 CASPERSEN, ELIZABETH 150.00 530223 00117766-011113 8000 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 150.00 451331 8/13/2020 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 1,160.00 REDIE MIX CONCRETE 530095 C2211379 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 39Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451331 8/13/2020 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO.Continued... 1,360.00 REDIE MIX CONCRETE 530094 C2213096 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 894.00 CONCRETE REDIE MIX 530096 C2217555 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 894.00 CONCRETE REDIE MIX 530248 C2218677 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 4,308.00 451332 8/13/2020 142533 CES IMAGING 209.25 CANON LEASE 530097 INV117192 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 69.75 CANON LEASE 530097 INV117192 6303.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 279.00 451333 8/13/2020 100683 CHEMSEARCH 666.65 WATER TREATMENT SERVICE 530387 7058072 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 666.65 451334 8/13/2020 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 15.19 UNIFORMS 530249 4057534895 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 22.62 RENTAL UNIFORM 530102 4057535188 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 38.70 RENTAL UNIFORM 530100 4057535208 6102.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 34.37 RENTAL UNIFORM 530101 4057535231 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 39.41 RENTAL UNIFORM 530098 4057535259 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 31.90 LAUNDRY 530099 4057535270 6303.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 76.75 TOWELS 530250 4058105087 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 15.12 RUG SERVICE 530385 4058238068 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 22.62 RENTAL UNIFORM 530366 4058238300 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 38.70 RENTAL UNIFORM 530368 4058238403 6102.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 34.37 UNIFORM RENTAL 530362 4058238443 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 31.90 LAUNDRY 530365 4058238444 6303.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 39.41 RENTAL UNIFORM 530367 4058238463 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 441.06 451335 8/13/2020 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 330.48 65% OF XCEL 530103 7578 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 330.48 451336 8/13/2020 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 775.89 65% OF XCEL 530104 7579 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 775.89 451337 8/13/2020 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 754.10 65% OF XCEL 530105 7580 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 40Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451337 8/13/2020 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD Continued... 754.10 451338 8/13/2020 146472 CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE OF MN 3,290.00 PW CLEANING 530251 I00071071 6303.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 3,290.00 451339 8/13/2020 150994 CLASEN, ANDREW 75.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIAL 530559 #VAN2 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 75.00 451340 8/13/2020 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 50.00-2486 530445 545218 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 76.66-2484 530449 545834 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,554.00 24978 530450 545919 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,704.00 25006 530448 545920 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,399.00 24992 530447 545924 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 120.00 25073 530446 546169 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,650.34 451341 8/13/2020 145926 CLEARWATER ANALYTICS, LLC 846.99 INVESTMENT SOFTWARE 530393 112912 1001.4706 INCOME ON INVESTMENTS GENERAL FUND REVENUES 846.99 451342 8/13/2020 146851 CLIFTON LARSON ALLEN LLP 1,000.00 AUDIT 530106 053-197822 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 1,803.38 CARES CONSULTING 530067 2581315 4635.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COVID-19 2,803.38 451343 8/13/2020 120433 COMCAST 49.71 CABLE 530107 877210614074010 5-7/2020 5710.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 49.71 451344 8/13/2020 120433 COMCAST 134.94 CABLE 530252 877210614017744 9 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 134.94 451345 8/13/2020 120433 COMCAST 150.86 CABLE 530253 877210614074443 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 41Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451345 8/13/2020 120433 COMCAST Continued... 8-7/2020 150.86 451346 8/13/2020 120433 COMCAST 1.81 RAMP INTERNET,PHONE 530254 877210614070356 6-8/2020 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1.81 451347 8/13/2020 120433 COMCAST 6.75 CABLE TV 530255 877210614002397 3-8/2020 6302.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL EXPENSES 6.75 451348 8/13/2020 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 20.30 CABLE TV 530108 877210614016112 0-7/2020 5511.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 20.30 451349 8/13/2020 104928 CONCRETE CUTTING & CORING INC. 58.33 SAW REPAIR PARTS 530109 15782 5932.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL STORM SEWER 283.57 REPAIR EQUIPMENT 530256 15915 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 341.90 451350 8/13/2020 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 155.29 MEASURING WHEEL/ VEST 530257 0199159-IN 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 155.29 451351 8/13/2020 100012 CORE & MAIN 1,735.81 DANENS BUILDING STORM PIPE 530112 M738099 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,025.48 DANENS BUILDING STORM PIPE 530113 M746058 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,725.36-DANENS STORM PIPE RETURN 530110 M747199 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 571.48-DANENS STORM PIPE RETURN 530111 M772126 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 464.45 451352 8/13/2020 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 19.10 WATER COOLER BOTTLES 530258 I14X76455704 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 200.15 WATER 530259 I14X76584404 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 219.25 451353 8/13/2020 150926 DAHL, ROBERT 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 42Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451353 8/13/2020 150926 DAHL, ROBERT Continued... 319.07 530190 00089701-034260 8002 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 319.07 451354 8/13/2020 104020 DALCO 96.24 C HALL SAN WIPES 530262 3649429 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 192.48 SAN WIPES CITY WIDE 530260 3649943 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 692.12 COVID CLNG GLOVE ELECTION 530261 3650347 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 980.84 451355 8/13/2020 150957 DALEIDEN, AMY 78.11 530221 00126285-034162 4004 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 78.11 451356 8/13/2020 150922 DESHLER, ANN 202.14 530186 00078733-015271 9001 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 202.14 451357 8/13/2020 100571 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS 5,652.35 ROAD PAINT 530373 802196002 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 5,652.35 451358 8/13/2020 150901 DOSCOTH, MATTHEW 125.00 CLASS REFUND 530263 GOLF COURSE 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 125.00 451359 8/13/2020 150952 DOYLE, SUSAN 45.38 530216 00088957-034163 1005 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 45.38 451360 8/13/2020 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES INC. 4,773.58 WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS 530374 827000948-20 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,773.58 451361 8/13/2020 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 107.10 EDINA HOUSING PH 530114 785449 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 107.10 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 43Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451361 8/13/2020 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC.Continued... 451362 8/13/2020 143195 EDINA MARKET STREET LLC 47,543.11 DEED PASSTHROUGH GRANT 530115 08032020 4429.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CCGP Grant - Market Street 2,892.55 CENTER BLOCK TRASH -APRIL 2020 530265 108 4095.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 645.89 CENTER RAMP - APRIL CLEANING 530269 109 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 2,752.16 CENTER BLOCK TRASH - MAY 2020 530264 110 4095.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 582.89 CENTER RAMP - MAY CLEANING 530268 111 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 4,859.33 CENTER BLOCK TRASH - JUNE 2020 530266 112A 4095.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 520.92 CENTER RAMP - JUNE CLEANING 530267 113A 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 59,796.85 451363 8/13/2020 103594 EDINALARM INC. 399.99 ALARM 530270 54819 5420.6250 ALARM SERVICE CLUB HOUSE 345.16 PRO SHOP ALARM 530271 54839 5420.6250 ALARM SERVICE CLUB HOUSE 745.15 451364 8/13/2020 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 401.00 FLUSH VALVE REBUILD KIT 530272 0068846-IN 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 401.00 451365 8/13/2020 150896 ENERVATION INC 3,960.00 530116 0036125-IN 5400.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT GOLF BALANCE SHEET 3,960.00 451366 8/13/2020 150924 ERDALL, STEVE 110.39 530188 00089533-034250 3008 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 110.39 451367 8/13/2020 100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 5,477.00 CASTING AND RINGS 530375 AA6396 5932.6536 CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 5,477.00 451368 8/13/2020 134730 EXPLORE EDINA 3,558.05 JUNE LODGING TAX 530068 081020 1001.4030 LODGING TAX GENERAL FUND REVENUES 4,464.58 JUNE LODGING TAX 530068 081020 1001.4030 LODGING TAX GENERAL FUND REVENUES 1,853.35 JUNE LODGING TAX 530068 081020 5701.4030 LODGING TAX EDINBOROUGH PARK REVENUES 9,875.98 451369 8/13/2020 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 44Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451369 8/13/2020 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY Continued... 1,747.75 GEAR ASY, ARM ASYS 530119 1-6469726 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 173.68 ROTOR, LINING 530275 1-6489469 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 216.51 ROTOR, LINING, PAD 530276 1-6489851 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 40.64 WIRE AND CABLE 530278 1-6491359 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 127.04 ROTOR ASY 530277 19-845682 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 838.27-CREDIT MEMO 530118 69-390754 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 117.76-CREDIT MEMO 530117 69-390945 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 424.30 PADS AND ROTORS 530274 69-391642 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 53.99 BRAKE PADS 530273 69-391698 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 4.07 SENSOR 530363 69-391961 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 48.54 SPARK PLUG, FUEL ADDITIVE 530364 69-392026 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 1,880.49 451370 8/13/2020 147181 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE, LLC 330.00 24851 530452 E-1627 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 340.00 25018 530451 E1639 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 670.00 451371 8/13/2020 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 23.83 FASTENERS 530120 MNTC2162937 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 23.83 451372 8/13/2020 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 3,229.78 10" GV PARTS 530377 0459701 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 3,229.78 451373 8/13/2020 141837 FIRST CHOICE COFFEE SERVICES 389.55 COFFEE FOR CITY HALL 530121 808360 1120.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 389.55 451374 8/13/2020 126444 FISH WINDOW CLEANING 990.00 RAMP WINDOW CLEANING 530279 2315--37724 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 990.00 451375 8/13/2020 140809 FLAGSHIP RECREATION 2,040.00 BENCH FOR WILLIAMS PARK 530280 F8340 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 2,040.00 451376 8/13/2020 130699 FLEETPRIDE 647.31 DRIVE SHAFT 530122 BRV011046 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 45Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451376 8/13/2020 130699 FLEETPRIDE Continued... 647.31 451377 8/13/2020 150928 FRIEDE, MARLYN 59.75 530192 00089708-034261 6002 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 59.75 451378 8/13/2020 150944 FRUECHTE, ETHAN 107.48 530208 00121986-029904 3007 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 107.48 451379 8/13/2020 102456 GALLS INC. 449.45 UNIFORMS 530123 BC1161556 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,481.36 NEW POLICE HIRE 530378 BC1166316 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 90.00 TIE CLIPS 530379 BC1168249 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,020.81 451380 8/13/2020 150934 GALLUP, REBECCA 180.00 530198 00120907-034263 6008 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 180.00 451381 8/13/2020 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC 72.00-TRIP CHARGE REFUND 528792 W12000 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 390.00 EAST AMOINIA ALARM 530124 W12043 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 318.00 451382 8/13/2020 150943 GAVIN, SAM 170.00 530207 00119260-030551 7009 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 170.00 451383 8/13/2020 147116 GERK, CHARLES 120.00 PE LICENSE 530281 EXPENSE REPORT-8/2020 01261.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS A261 HOOTEN DEMO & CLEANUP 120.00 451384 8/13/2020 150979 GINSBURG, JENNIFER 932.50 530391 EDINA AMBULANCE 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 46Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451384 8/13/2020 150979 GINSBURG, JENNIFER Continued... REFUND 932.50 451385 8/13/2020 116190 GLOBAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY 389.21 530354 116313855 4635.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES COVID-19 389.21 451386 8/13/2020 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. 1,482.30 JULY GSOC TIX 530125 0070358 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,482.30 451387 8/13/2020 150962 GRAHAM, JOHN & KELLI 246.08 530226 00125537-012083 2000 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 246.08 451388 8/13/2020 101103 GRAINGER 158.04 HORNET SPRAY 530126 9609065694 1640.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 21.69 SAFETY GLASSES 530127 9610080187 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 437.07 WATER SOFTNER SYLINOIDS 530384 9614055581 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 616.80 451389 8/13/2020 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO., INC. 371.00 IRR WORK 66TH&BARRIE 530282 202650 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 371.00 451390 8/13/2020 145054 GROUND CONTROL SYSTEMS 6,201.00 530128 1-119273 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 6,201.00 451391 8/13/2020 140010 GROUP HEALTH INC.-WORKSITE 389.00 JULY EAP INVOICE 530560 W817579 1170.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES 389.00 451392 8/13/2020 150953 GUELTZOW, ERIN 19.53 530217 00100946-034052 0001 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 19.53 451393 8/13/2020 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC. 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 47Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451393 8/13/2020 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC.Continued... 90.00 BLACK DIRT 530129 2-253972 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION 30.00 BLACK DIRT 530283 4-396301 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION 120.00 451394 8/13/2020 100790 HACH COMPANY 254.07 WATER TESTING SUPPLIES 530284 12056915 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 254.07 451395 8/13/2020 150691 HALLMARK CLEANERS 1,679.75 530130 208160-073120 4635.6201 LAUNDRY COVID-19 1,679.75 451396 8/13/2020 150940 HANLINE, TIM 67.50 530204 00124011-020098 3007 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 67.50 451397 8/13/2020 150975 HASSENSTAB, BETTY 50.00 530386 EDINA AMBULANCE REFUND 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50.00 451398 8/13/2020 100798 HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIPMENT 6,000.00 530131 C31125 1301.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 66.00 SCREW, SPRING RING 530371 C31125.6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 6,066.00 451399 8/13/2020 143585 HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE 2,870.10 MEDICAL DIRECTOR FEES 530132 66336 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,870.10 451400 8/13/2020 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 527.58 GLASS BARRIER FOR MARIE SEGAR 530285 700679 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 527.58 451401 8/13/2020 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURING 98.96 GENERAL SUPPLIES 530286 03348880 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 98.96 451402 8/13/2020 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 48Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451402 8/13/2020 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC.Continued... 2,204.20 25005 530453 212561 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 79.50 25182 530455 213418 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 655.50 25198 530454 213419 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,939.20 451403 8/13/2020 150954 HOVINEN, MINNA 11.49 530218 00106068-016100 3016 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 11.49 451404 8/13/2020 142744 HP INC. 6,543.64 REPL CAD COMPUTERS 530561 9010551194 2310.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT E911 6,543.64 451405 8/13/2020 120085 IDEAL SERVICE INC. 605.00 ANNUAL PM ON VFDS 530133 10657 5921.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 605.00 451406 8/13/2020 146427 INBOUND BREWCO 92.00 25016 530456 7720 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 92.00 25212 530457 7832 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 184.00 451407 8/13/2020 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 933.80 25015 530459 92448 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,075.40 25000 530458 92449 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 220.60 24987 530460 92465 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 802.45 25211 530589 92678 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,032.25 451408 8/13/2020 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 26.84 COUPLING, ADAPTER 530287 INV201938 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 26.84 451409 8/13/2020 146337 INDUSTRIAL BATTERY PRODUCTS INC 577.04 BATTERY WATERER 530392 54151992 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 577.04 451410 8/13/2020 150898 INVICTUS BREWING LLC 132.00 25020 530461 1697 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 49Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451410 8/13/2020 150898 INVICTUS BREWING LLC Continued... 132.00 25021 530462 1698 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 132.00 25019 530463 1699 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 396.00 451411 8/13/2020 143913 JACK PINE BREWERY 165.00 24864 530464 3506 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 165.00 451412 8/13/2020 108618 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC. 2,995.00 FIRE SUPPRESSION 530562 IN120560 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,995.00 451413 8/13/2020 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 360.29 BLADES, FASTENERS, COUNTERSINK 530134 7/20-EQUIP OPERATIONS 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 38.22 530355 POLICE-7/2020 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 398.51 451414 8/13/2020 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 218.00 530135 168020 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 218.00 451415 8/13/2020 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 464.00-2485 530465 3082408 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,588.85 25007 530467 3117599 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 78.45 24954 530468 3117600 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,496.05 24993 530466 3117601 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10,699.35 451416 8/13/2020 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 7.48-2483 530480 109742 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 14.97-2482 530481 109743 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 196.38 24887 530492 1614801 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 18.45 24879 530498 1614802 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,262.59 530498 1614802 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 11.90 25034 530493 1614803 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 565.00 530493 1614803 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 24877 530497 1614804 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 95.15 530497 1614804 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 13.09 24893 530499 1614805 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 50Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451416 8/13/2020 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.Continued... 1,596.00 530499 1614805 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.95 25046 530496 1614806 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 416.00 530496 1614806 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7.14 24882 530495 1614807 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 405.80 530495 1614807 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 25053 530491 1614808 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 123.36 25053 530491 1614808 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7.14 25041 530494 1614809 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 680.00 530494 1614809 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 36.29 24903 530479 1614810 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,192.09 24903 530479 1614810 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.33 24911 530478 1614811 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 994.70 24911 530478 1614811 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 32.13 25035 530477 1614812 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,186.50 25035 530477 1614812 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 22.61 25037 530476 1614813 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,248.75 25037 530476 1614813 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 9.52 24900 530475 1614814 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 794.25 24900 530475 1614814 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 24919 530474 1614815 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 86.00 24919 530474 1614815 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 27.37 24918 530473 1614816 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,358.60 24918 530473 1614816 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 27.37 24906 530472 1614817 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,295.43 24906 530472 1614817 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 15.47 25039 530471 1614818 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,728.00 25039 530471 1614818 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 24917 530470 1614819 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 123.38 24917 530470 1614819 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.95 25045 530469 1614820 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 416.00 25045 530469 1614820 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 14.28 24929 530490 1614824 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,058.48 24929 530490 1614824 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 11.90 24938 530489 1614825 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 854.78 24938 530489 1614825 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10.71 25036 530488 1614826 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 508.50 25036 530488 1614826 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 19.04 25038 530487 1614827 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,742.25 25038 530487 1614827 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 51Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451416 8/13/2020 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.Continued... 25.41 24926 530486 1614828 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,597.90 24926 530486 1614828 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 24947 530485 1614829 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 168.00 24947 530485 1614829 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 15.47 24932 530483 1614830 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,267.50 24932 530483 1614830 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.95 25044 530482 1614832 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 416.00 25044 530482 1614832 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 15.47 24945 530484 1614833 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,230.34 24945 530484 1614833 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 28,955.17 451417 8/13/2020 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 124.13 DUBLIN A/C UNIT REPAIR 530136 1267991 5912.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL HOUSES 124.13 451418 8/13/2020 141864 JOSEPH E JOHNSON & SONS CONSTRUCTION 5,750.00 DOME NET REPAIR - EQUIP RENT 530288 1098 5210.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 5,750.00 451419 8/13/2020 150980 JOSTEN INC 77.89 530395 EDINA AMBULANCE REFUND 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 77.89 451420 8/13/2020 150949 KAPLAN, BEN 27.96 530213 00117893-034208 3060 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 27.96 451421 8/13/2020 150930 KESNER, MACKENZIE 114.19 530194 00121550-029064 2001 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 114.19 451422 8/13/2020 131976 KLEMMENSEN, BETH 22.28 530289 1135813-REFUND 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 110.00 530289 1135813-REFUND 1600.4722.08 SHELTER BUILDING RENT PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 186.00 530289 1135813-REFUND 1000.2065 DEPOSITS PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 318.28 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 52Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451422 8/13/2020 131976 KLEMMENSEN, BETH Continued... 451423 8/13/2020 150981 KOCANDA, ANTHONY 78.33 530402 EDINA AMBULANCE REFUND 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 78.33 451424 8/13/2020 139640 KOEHLER, THOMAS 221.00 PGA ANNUAL DUES 530290 PGA 2020 MEMBERSHIP DUES 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 221.00 451425 8/13/2020 105887 KOESSLER, JOE 314.00 AQUARIUM MAINTENANCE 530291 JULY/AUGUST 2020 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 314.00 451426 8/13/2020 150935 KUJALA, JACOB 372.71 530199 00125414-016196 0008 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 372.71 451427 8/13/2020 150960 LALL, CASSANDRA 180.97 530224 00122410-011059 4009 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 180.97 451428 8/13/2020 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 590.70 ABSORBANTS,WASHERS, COUPLERS 530137 9307762752 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 717.80 NUTS SCREWS BITS AMPS 530360 9307778853 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 1,308.50 451429 8/13/2020 134957 LEACH LAW OFFICE LLC 21,116.75 530356 0656.001-7/2020 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 21,116.75 451430 8/13/2020 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 100.00 CLASS 530292 325311 5510.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ARENA ADMINISTRATION 100.00 451431 8/13/2020 150951 LEGROS, JAMES 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 53Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451431 8/13/2020 150951 LEGROS, JAMES Continued... 4.11 530215 00081309-016505 0000 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 4.11 451432 8/13/2020 144426 LIFE LINE BILLING SYSTEMS, LLC 8,135.37 530294 53404 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 26.48 530293 53405 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 8,161.85 451433 8/13/2020 117026 LIFE-ASSIST INC. 52.98 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 530346 1022061 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 265.50 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 530295 1022645 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 318.48 451434 8/13/2020 101146 LINGO - FORMERLY IMPACT 206.80 LONG DISTANCE 530138 608753356 6202.6188 TELEPHONE I.T. EXPENSES 206.80 451435 8/13/2020 100858 LOGIS 792.00 530563 49044 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,805.00 530563 49044 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 5,534.00 530563 49044 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 6,189.00 530563 49044 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 7,814.00 530563 49044 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 8,004.00 530563 49044 1170.6160 DATA PROCESSING HUMAN RESOURCES 7,607.00 530563 49044 5902.6160 DATA PROCESSING UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 2,045.00 530563 49044 6202.6160 DATA PROCESSING I.T. EXPENSES 2,047.00 530563 49044 6202.6188 TELEPHONE I.T. EXPENSES 2,083.00 530563 49044 6202.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT I.T. EXPENSES 45,920.00 451436 8/13/2020 141916 LUPULIN BREWING 92.30 24815 530500 30959 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 92.30 451437 8/13/2020 150976 M NORDTORP-MAD 560.80 530388 EDINA AMBULANCE REFUND 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 560.80 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 54Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451438 8/13/2020 129657 M.S. INDUSTRIES INC.Continued... 2,343.00 530139 401920 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 2,343.00 451439 8/13/2020 150902 MA, XIAO 149.00 CLASS REFUND 530296 GOLF COURSE 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 149.00 451440 8/13/2020 150977 MAHAFFEY, CORY 41.89 530389 EDINA AMBULANCE REFUND 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 41.89 451441 8/13/2020 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 1,327.71 FUEL 530141 021849295 6102.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 7,869.80 FUEL 530140 21849292 6102.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 7,607.99 FUEL 530142 37002 6102.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 1,910.26 FUEL 530143 41549 6102.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 750.85 FUEL 530369 48251 6102.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 19,466.61 451442 8/13/2020 146040 MEGA BEER LLC 230.30 24859 530502 3656 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 809.60 24860 530501 3657 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 408.95 24861 530503 3658 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,448.85 451443 8/13/2020 150933 MELIN, STEVE 75.00 530197 00116118-016064 8117 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 75.00 451444 8/13/2020 137002 MELTWATER NEWS US INC. 9,999.00 MELTWATER ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION 530297 IN-S151-507810 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 9,999.00 451445 8/13/2020 101483 MENARDS 102.21 PAINT SUPPLIES 530145 021321 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 64.64 LANDSCAPE MATERIAL 530144 21322 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 24.86 LANDSCAPE MATERIAL 530299 21480 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 123.80 EMT CONDUIT 530300 21981 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 55Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451445 8/13/2020 101483 MENARDS Continued... 29.57 4X8' AC2 TREATED PLYWOOD 530301 21988 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 5.87 PAINT 530302 21991 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 350.95 451446 8/13/2020 101987 MENARDS 25.56 GENERAL SUPPLIES 530147 2864 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 79.60 GENERAL SUPPLIES 530298 3157 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 33.40 GENERAL SUPPLIES 530146 98925 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 138.56 451447 8/13/2020 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ES-USE FOR SEWER 474,680.33 SEPTEMBER SEWER SERVICE 530303 0001112847 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT 474,680.33 451448 8/13/2020 144517 MEYERHOFF, JAY 411.00 PGA ANNUAL DUES 530304 PGA 2020 MEMBERSHIP DUES 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 411.00 451449 8/13/2020 134387 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC. 484.51 530504 78605 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 484.51 451450 8/13/2020 150996 MILER TOWING INC 325.00 CONTRACTED REPAIR 530370 272058 6102.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 325.00 451451 8/13/2020 122201 MILLER TOWING INC. 300.00 CONTRACTED REPAIR 530305 272491 6102.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 300.00 451452 8/13/2020 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 62.62 FLUIDS/GASSES 530306 00063590 7413.6545 CHEMICALS PSTF FIRE TOWER 62.62 451453 8/13/2020 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 5.38 530150 180160069 5821.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 21.51 530152 180160070 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 5.38 530148 180161953 5821.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 43.01 530151 180161954 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 56Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451453 8/13/2020 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC.Continued... 16.13 530149 180161955 5861.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS VERNON OCCUPANCY 91.41 451454 8/13/2020 100522 MINNESOTA AIR INC. 212.00-MATERIAL RETURN 522012 1708617-00 5424.6530 REPAIR PARTS RANGE 57.15 ACADEMY 9 AC 522740 1708626-00 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 60.17 FILTERS 522054 1709366-00 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 433.46 DUBLIN A/C UNIT REPAIR 530153 3162107-00 5912.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL HOUSES 338.78 451455 8/13/2020 149244 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 40.00 MN HOSPITALITY FEE 530307 HOSPITALITY FEE 2020 5760.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 40.00 451456 8/13/2020 113638 MINNESOTA NATIVE LANDSCAPES INC. 5,677.50 VEGETATED BMP 530308 25265 04447.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Stormwater BMP Maintenance 5,677.50 451457 8/13/2020 103010 MINNESOTA WOMEN'S GOLF ASSOCIATION 2,930.00 HANDICAP SERVICE 530357 5109817 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 2,930.00 451458 8/13/2020 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC 394.25 25187 530507 15503 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 189.00 25009 530505 E-15363 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 464.00 25202 530506 E-15505 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,047.25 451459 8/13/2020 100912 MOTOROLA INC. 4,579.15 530309 16114078 2340.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DWI FORFEITURE 4,579.15 451460 8/13/2020 143339 MR CUTTING EDGE 225.00 SHARPEN ZAM BLADES 530154 2384 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 225.00 451461 8/13/2020 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 220.72 FAN 530310 1270629-00 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 196.70 ROD ENDS, LOCK NUTS 530155 1270630-00 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 57Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451461 8/13/2020 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC.Continued... 417.42 451462 8/13/2020 128911 MUHAR, MICHAEL 290.47 530156 EDINA AMBULANCE REFUND 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 290.47 451463 8/13/2020 150983 NATIONAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC 335.49 530564 EDINA AMBULANCE REFUND 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 335.49 451464 8/13/2020 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 14.00 24931 530510 159711 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,176.00 24931 530510 159711 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 636.00 24905 530508 159712 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 26.00 25027 530509 159713 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,508.00 530509 159713 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.00 25114 530590 159862 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 88.00 25114 530590 159862 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,450.00 451465 8/13/2020 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 119.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES 530311 113254458001 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 119.35 451466 8/13/2020 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES 28.74 530312 W20060577 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 57.48 530312 W20060577 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 86.22 530312 W20060577 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 201.18 530312 W20060577 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 316.14 530312 W20060577 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 57.48 530312 W20060577 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 114.96 530312 W20060577 5410.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 129.33 530312 W20060577 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 57.48 530312 W20060577 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 86.22 530312 W20060577 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 86.22 530312 W20060577 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 129.33 530312 W20060577 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 3,149.19 530312 W20060577 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 58Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451466 8/13/2020 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES Continued... 28.74 530312 W20060577 6202.6188 TELEPHONE I.T. EXPENSES 28.74 530312 W20060577 6202.6188 TELEPHONE I.T. EXPENSES 86.22 530312 W20060577 6202.6188 TELEPHONE I.T. EXPENSES 299.40 530313 W20060581 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 4,943.07 451467 8/13/2020 142885 OLIPHANT BREWING 117.00 24970 530513 4947 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 172.00 24968 530511 4948 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 172.00 24971 530512 4949 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 461.00 451468 8/13/2020 100936 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE, INC. 62.42 SUPPLIES 530157 658352 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 62.42 451469 8/13/2020 102265 OLSON, TIM 316.00 CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 530566 UNIFORM REIMBURSEMENT 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 316.00 451470 8/13/2020 141965 OMNI BREWING COMPANY LLC 90.00 24983 530514 7687 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 347.00 24818 530516 E-7651 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 207.00 25011 530515 E-7686 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 194.00 25204 530517 E-7726 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 838.00 451471 8/13/2020 101659 ORKIN 142.36 PW PEST 530314 200672459 6303.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSES 142.36 451472 8/13/2020 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 7.50 24925 530518 97600 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 474.10 24925 530518 97600 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12.50 25025 530519 97605 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,190.00 25025 530519 97605 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,684.10 451473 8/13/2020 150939 PEDERSON, DONALD 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 59Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451473 8/13/2020 150939 PEDERSON, DONALD Continued... 323.34 530203 00085119-011121 9011 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 323.34 451474 8/13/2020 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 264.80 25070 530521 80234709 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 526.53 25030 530520 83076359 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 791.33 451475 8/13/2020 149249 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING 529.00 24973 530523 31035 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 529.00 24974 530522 31037 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,058.00 451476 8/13/2020 150950 PERKINS CAPITAL LLC 53.88 530214 00126593-033029 9001 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 53.88 451477 8/13/2020 119935 PET CROSSING 1,845.05 VET BILLS FOR BLITZ 530158 170652 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 1,845.05 451478 8/13/2020 138081 PETERSON SALT & WATER TREATMENT 85.80 SALT - ST. 1 530159 179578 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 85.80 451479 8/13/2020 135849 PETSMART #2412 179.97 FOOD FOR BLITZ 530160 3101 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 179.97 451480 8/13/2020 150937 PHILLIP, DOUGLAS 165.77 530201 00122488-020037 2006 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 165.77 451481 8/13/2020 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 29.17 24702 530527 6069028 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,911.75 24702 530527 6069028 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 24963 530532 6072453 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 60Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451481 8/13/2020 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 172.20 530532 6072453 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 24888 530531 6072454 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 152.25 530531 6072454 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 19.05 24872 530533 6072455 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,187.92 530533 6072455 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 9.52 24949 530530 6072456 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 604.20 24949 530530 6072456 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 13.09 24939 530529 6072457 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,637.60 24939 530529 6072457 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 23.80 24921 530528 6072458 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,739.25 24921 530528 6072458 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 14.28 24912 530526 6072459 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,173.00 24912 530526 6072459 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.38 24957 530525 6072460 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 229.40 24957 530525 6072460 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 28.56 24895 530524 6072461 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,548.75 24895 530524 6072461 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10,498.55 451482 8/13/2020 102423 PLAISTED COMPANIES INC 1,282.82 529271 34327 1642.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,282.82-CREDIT 529270 34327CREDIT 1642.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK FIELD MAINTENANCE 424.50 SOIL 530161 35356 1640.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 424.50 451483 8/13/2020 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 108.00 RODENT CONTROL 530162 #6733002 5720.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 108.00 451484 8/13/2020 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 1,128.00 TIRES 530163 210482755 6102.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 1,128.00 451485 8/13/2020 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 192.25 530315 BR 294-001 1160.6575 PRINTING FINANCE 192.25 451486 8/13/2020 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC. 12.50 WATER 530164 317667951 5710.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 12.50 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 61Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451486 8/13/2020 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC.Continued... 451487 8/13/2020 108875 PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE 620.10 GRANDVIEW LAND CARE 530166 35675 1640.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 885.02 LIBRARY LAND CARE 530165 35676 1640.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 1,505.12 451488 8/13/2020 128861 PRIMARY PRODUCTS COMPANY 615.00 MEDICAL GLOVES 530316 70923 1400.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 615.00 451489 8/13/2020 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 347.00 BATHROOM/CLEANING SUPPLIES 530382 158587 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 187.00 LATEX GLOVES 530317 158593 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 416.30 LINERS, TOWELS 530318 158594 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 950.30 451490 8/13/2020 143618 PRYES BREWING COMPANY 238.00 24999 530534 1-12610 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 283.00 24986 530535 12611 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 521.00 451491 8/13/2020 123078 QUALIFIED LABORATORIES INC. 499.06 COVID CLEANERS 530319 58788 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 499.06 451492 8/13/2020 150941 REFINED REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC 246.21 530205 00125416-012014 5002 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 246.21 451493 8/13/2020 144351 REHDER FORESTRY CONSULTING 1,497.10 OAK WILT INSPECTIONS 530167 110 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 1,497.10 451494 8/13/2020 139188 REVOLUTIONARY SPORTS LLC 3,734.50 REVSPORTS SUMMER 530320 #1998 1626.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPORTS CAMP 3,734.50 451495 8/13/2020 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 240.00 WEST WATER SOFTNERS 530321 80098 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 62Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451495 8/13/2020 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY Continued... 764.71 WEST BATH FAUCET 530322 80099 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,004.71 451496 8/13/2020 150936 RINE, ROBERT 29.29 530200 00087619-033213 7003 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 29.29 451497 8/13/2020 139927 ROCHESTER FIRE DEPARTMENT 2,915.54 530168 MN-TFI OT/BF-82020 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 2,915.54 451498 8/13/2020 139927 ROCHESTER FIRE DEPARTMENT 1,237.25 530323 MN-TFL OT/BF-8/2020 #2 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 1,237.25 451499 8/13/2020 150947 ROSE, ERNEST 74.26 530211 00125610-020282 8002 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 74.26 451500 8/13/2020 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 318.88 PARTS WASHER SOLVENT 530170 83625982 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 124.21 PARTS WASHER CLEANOUT 530169 R002717304 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 443.09 451501 8/13/2020 149830 Salmen, Anne 250.00 CLASS REFUNDS 530324 GOLF COURSE #2 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 250.00 451502 8/13/2020 144553 SALTCO MSP LLC 491.40 SOFTNER SALT 530325 45094 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 491.40 451503 8/13/2020 144371 SENTEXT 39.63 SENTEXT SUBSCRIPTION 530326 158114 6202.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT I.T. EXPENSES 140.94 SENTEXT SUBSCRIPTION 530372 163913 6202.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT I.T. EXPENSES 180.57 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 63Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451503 8/13/2020 144371 SENTEXT Continued... 451504 8/13/2020 101106 SERVICEMASTER 755.00 RAMP TRASH ROOM CLEANING 530171 65027 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 755.00 RAMP TRASH ROOM CLEANING 530327 65052 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,510.00 451505 8/13/2020 150942 SETTLE, PAUL 57.51 530206 00100754-015907 3006 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 57.51 451506 8/13/2020 144705 SHAKOPEE BREWHALL 144.00 25062 530536 2060 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 144.00 451507 8/13/2020 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 250.49 PAINT FOR FENCES 530328 4794-7 5911.6532 PAINT WELL PUMPS 68.43 PAINT 530329 4893-7 5911.6532 PAINT WELL PUMPS 318.92 451508 8/13/2020 132130 SIEVE, SHANNON 5.64 530330 1299623-REFUND 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 75.00 530330 1299623-REFUND 1600.4722.09 ROSLAND RENTAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 80.64 451509 8/13/2020 120784 SIGN PRO 131.64 530380 15392 1280.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 62.29 SIGNS 530172 15397 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 97.10 530331 15398 4635.6531 SIGNS & POSTS COVID-19 163.15 PARKS SIGNS 530333 15409 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 149.98 SIGNAGE 530332 15411 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 604.16 451510 8/13/2020 150956 SIMMONS, LAWRENCEC 61.51 530220 00120974-011120 7006 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 61.51 451511 8/13/2020 150923 SITEK, RICHARD 41.04 530187 00089750-034265 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 64Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451511 8/13/2020 150923 SITEK, RICHARD Continued... 6003 41.04 451512 8/13/2020 150929 SNYDER, DEBORAH 16.27 530193 00089187-034198 8004 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 16.27 451513 8/13/2020 133014 SOCCER SHOTS 4,250.00 SUMMER SOCCER SHOTS 530334 8-10-2020 1626.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPORTS CAMP 4,250.00 451514 8/13/2020 150927 SONG, GRACE 80.74 530191 00110913-016104 4008 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 80.74 451515 8/13/2020 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS .80 NONE 530541 1979775 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,517.68 24913 530540 1979776 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 838.40 24896 530537 1979777 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,070.80 25028 530538 1979778 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,132.80 25029 530539 1979779 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .80 25069 530542 1979780 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .80 24342 530543 1981135 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .80 25076 530544 1981136 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 108.00 25076 530544 1981136 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .80 25107 530592 1982368 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 700.00 25107 530592 1982368 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12.00 25106 530593 1982369 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 768.00 25106 530593 1982369 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 20.80 25240 530591 1982370 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,050.00 25240 530591 1982370 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 9.20 25119 530594 1982371 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,615.56 25119 530594 1982371 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.60 25245 530595 1982373 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 809.40 25245 530595 1982373 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12,662.24 451516 8/13/2020 141066 SOUTHWEST LAWN & SNOW 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 65Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451516 8/13/2020 141066 SOUTHWEST LAWN & SNOW Continued... 1,296.00 LAWN SERVICE 530173 1873 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 144.00 LAWN SERVICE 530173 1873 5553.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 1,440.00 451517 8/13/2020 150931 STANG, JOHN 300.00 530195 00101269-033266 9009 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 300.00 451518 8/13/2020 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 174.00 24982 530546 35340 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 276.00 24996 530545 35341 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 450.00 451519 8/13/2020 124029 STERICYCLE 456.42 SHRED-IT SERVICES 530174 8180116474 6202.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I.T. EXPENSES 319.93 SHRED-IT - BALLOTS 530175 8180175232 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION 210.31 SHRED-IT SERVICES 530175 8180175232 6202.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I.T. EXPENSES 986.66 451520 8/13/2020 102786 STOP STICK LTD 483.50 STOP STICK 530335 0018171-IN 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 483.50 451521 8/13/2020 101015 STREICHERS 44.99 SWAT GEAR 530336 I1444216 1401.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM 44.99 451522 8/13/2020 120297 TADYCH, BRIAN 33.29 UNIFORM MASKS 530568 081020BT 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 33.29 451523 8/13/2020 106673 TAPCO 520.99 RRFB SUPPLIES 530337 I675203 2501.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PACS IS 520.99 451524 8/13/2020 122794 TENNANT SALES AND SERVICE COMPANY 2,707.52 CONTRACTED REPAIR 530176 917229843 6102.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 2,707.52 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 66Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451525 8/13/2020 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO Continued... 143.32 MASTER DISCONNECT 530177 54241-00 6102.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 143.32 451526 8/13/2020 150881 THE LIFEGUARD STORE 4,200.00 LIFE JACKETS 530178 INV615035 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 4,200.00 451527 8/13/2020 150945 TIMMERS, ELAINE 26.25 530209 00078635-015170 2002 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 26.25 451528 8/13/2020 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 573.39 NEW TORCH EQUIPMENT 530179 10362914 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION 34.04 WELDING GAS 530180 40122703 6102.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 607.43 451529 8/13/2020 131040 TRANS UNION RISK AND ALTERNATIVE 206.50 TLO 530338 269634-202007-1 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 206.50 451530 8/13/2020 103048 US BANK 2,000.00 2014 HRA ADMIN FEE 530396 5814652 3201.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL DS REVENUES 2,000.00 451531 8/13/2020 103048 US BANK 1,900.00 2015A HRA ADMIN FEE 530397 5814845 3201.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL DS REVENUES 1,900.00 451532 8/13/2020 103048 US BANK 450.00 2015A PAY AGENT FEE 530398 5811063 3301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PIR DS REVENUES 450.00 451533 8/13/2020 103048 US BANK 450.00 2016A PAY AGENT FEE 530399 5811116 3301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PIR DS REVENUES 450.00 451534 8/13/2020 103048 US BANK 450.00 2014A PAY AGENT FEE 530400 5811022 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 450.00 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 67Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451534 8/13/2020 103048 US BANK Continued... 451535 8/13/2020 103048 US BANK 450.00 2015B PAY AGENT FEE 530401 5811064 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 450.00 451536 8/13/2020 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 162.61 SANITIZER TOWELS; DISPENSERS 530339 536464-00 4635.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COVID-19 7.16 530181 545084-01 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 3.05 530066 545635-00 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 335.69 GARBAGE BAGS; TP 530340 547674-00 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 508.51 451537 8/13/2020 144209 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 85.50 25065 530548 1852 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 90.00 25064 530547 1853 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 175.50 451538 8/13/2020 101064 VESSCO INC. 3,029.76 CHEMICAL FEED EQUIPMENT 530376 80765 5911.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL PUMPS 3,029.76 451539 8/13/2020 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 218.15 PD MAILBOX LIGHTING 530182 S003845196.001 6302.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL EXPENSES 218.15 451540 8/13/2020 119454 VINOCOPIA 5.00 24915 530550 261308 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 305.96 24915 530550 261308 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12.50 24897 530549 261309 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,200.00 24897 530549 261309 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12.50 25042 530552 261310 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,200.00 25042 530552 261310 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.25 24923 530551 261313 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 152.00 24923 530551 261313 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6.25 25043 530553 261314 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,895.46 451541 8/13/2020 101932 VOTH, BART 104.97 UNIFORM JEANS 530341 073020BV 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 104.97 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 68Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451541 8/13/2020 101932 VOTH, BART Continued... 451542 8/13/2020 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 33.94 GARBAGE 530383 8333005-2282-2 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 33.94 451543 8/13/2020 135181 WATERFORD OIL COMPANY INC. 172.81 GAS AT ACADEMY TANK 530342 81077 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 172.81 451544 8/13/2020 131648 WENCK ASSOCIATES INC. 3,334.50 TRAFFIC STUDY 530570 55359-0249 4422.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES 3,334.50 451545 8/13/2020 149996 WENHAM, ROBYN 100.00 525530 PARKS & REC REFUND 1600.4390.69 PARTNERSHIP PROGRAMS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 100.00 451546 8/13/2020 150925 WENZEL, KYLE 228.88 530189 00121872-011055 4007 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 228.88 451547 8/13/2020 148230 WILLIAMS, KAREN 225.00 CLASS REFUND 530343 GOLF COURSE #2 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 225.00 451548 8/13/2020 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 24.75 24541 530567 147103 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,114.00 24541 530567 147103 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 16.50 24933 530565 148279 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,328.00 24933 530565 148279 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,919.90 24907 530554 148280 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 9.90 24883 530555 148281 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 680.00 530555 148281 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,093.05 451549 8/13/2020 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1.19 25075 530577 7293655 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 120.00 530577 7293655 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 69Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451549 8/13/2020 101312 WINE MERCHANTS Continued... 1.19 24967 530576 7293656 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 23.00 530576 7293656 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 15.47 25031 530578 7293657 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,920.00 530578 7293657 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.36 24878 530579 7293658 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 752.00 530579 7293658 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 9.52 24902 530572 7293659 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 645.29 24902 530572 7293659 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 15.47 25032 530569 7293660 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,856.00 25032 530569 7293660 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.38 24953 530575 7293663 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 44.00 24953 530575 7293663 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 15.47 25055 530574 7293664 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,376.00 25055 530574 7293664 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7,802.34 451550 8/13/2020 144412 WINEBOW 1.75 24930 530580 MN00081912 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 120.00 24930 530580 MN00081912 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10.50 25091 530596 MN00082178 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 976.00 530596 MN00082178 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3.50 24943 530581 MN00091913 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 300.00 24943 530581 MN00091913 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,411.75 451551 8/13/2020 130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 3,774.27 FUNGICIDES FOR ALL GREENS 530344 64101889 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 3,774.27 451552 8/13/2020 148067 WITLINGO INC. 250.00 WITLINGO SUBSCRIPTION 530345 INV-COE-082020 6202.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT I.T. EXPENSES 250.00 451553 8/13/2020 150955 WOLF, JOHN 12.32 530219 00112428-020030 5008 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 12.32 451554 8/13/2020 141925 WONDERWARE MIDWEST 64,568.00 SCADA SOFTWARE 530571 #INV22299 05570.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS General Rehab - Water 8/12/2020CITY OF EDINA 14:24:44R55CKR2LOGIS101 70Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 8/13/20208/6/2020 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 451554 8/13/2020 141925 WONDERWARE MIDWEST Continued... 4,325.00 WIN911 SOFTWARE 530183 #INV22309 05570.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS General Rehab - Water 68,893.00 451555 8/13/2020 142220 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY 295.80 24786 530582 2339 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 433.20 24985 530584 2353 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 322.50 24998 530583 2354 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,051.50 451556 8/13/2020 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 860.00 GIS CONSULTING 530184 R-015816-000-3 6202.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I.T. EXPENSES 860.00 451557 8/13/2020 130618 YOUNGSTEDTS COLLISION CENTER 3,761.21 CONTRACTED REPAIR 530185 20841 6102.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OP EXPENSES 3,761.21 451558 8/13/2020 150978 ZIEBARTH, ANNA 200.00 530390 EDINA AMBULANCE REFUND 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 200.00 2,248,605.48 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks 2,248,605.48 Total Payments 2,248,605.48 Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Don Uram, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Utility Rate Study Update Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for Utility Rate Study Update with Ehlers for $31,000. INTRODUCTION: This purchase is for a utility rate study update. See attached Request for Purchase. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Utility Rate Study Update Ehlers Proposal City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Date: August 18, 2020 To: Mayor and City Council From: Don Uram, Finance Director Subject: Request for Purchase: Utility Rate Study Update Purchase Subject to: ☐List Quote/Bid ☐State Contract ☒Service Contract The Recommended Bid is: ☒Within Budget ☐Not Within Budget Ehlers $31,000 Ehlers last completed a utility rate study for the water, sanitary sewer, and storm water funds in 2015 and a CIP confirmation update in 2018. It is recommended that a study be done every four years to coincide with the development of the City’s Capital Improvement Plan. Upon completion of the study, the City will have: • Rate recommendations for the water, sanitary sewer, and storm water funds for the next ten years. • Updated financial projections for each utility. • Established priorities for rate structure and capital spending. • A framework for the timing and amount of future debt issues. Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date: July 28, 2020 Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Ehlers $31,000 Recommended Quote or Bid: Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________ City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only) Budget Impact The cost of the project will be paid from the utility funds as outlined below. Water Utility $15,000 Sewer Utility $10,000 Storm Water Utility $ 6,000 Environmental Impact An expected outcome of the study is that the rate structure meets best practices for conservation but is financially sustainable. Community Impact The study will address some of the more common questions/concerns raised by residents and businesses including the three tier structure for water service and the use of the “winter quarter average” for sewer service. • • • • • • • • • Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2020-83: Approve Public Health Emergency Preparedness Agreement with City of Bloomington Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2020-83 authorizing P ublic Health Emergency Preparedness Agreement with the City of Bloomington. INTRODUCTION: This is the annual agreement between the City of Edina and the City of Bloomington for Public Health Emergency P reparedness services. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2020-83: Public Health Emergency Preparedness Agreement with City of Bloomington RESOLUTION NO 2020-83 AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF EDINA TO ENTER INTO A PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF BLOOMINGTON WHEREAS, the CITY, acting as a Community Health Board, and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 145A.04, is empowered to enter into a contractual agreement for the provision of statutorily prescribed public health services, and WHEREAS, the Public Health Division within the City of Bloomington is a duly certified public health agency operating in accordance with all applicable federal and state requirements, and WHEREAS, the CITY has for eighteen years contracted with the Public Health Division of the City of Bloomington for emergency preparedness and response services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Edina City Council that the Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute a Public Health Preparedness and Response Agreement with the City of Bloomington to complete administrative and programmatic duties as a Community Health Board. Passed and adopted this 18th day of August 2020. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 18, 2020, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 18th day of August 2020. _________________________________ City Clerk Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Ryan Browning, I.T. Director Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Fiber Optic Network Expansion Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve request for purchase for fiber optic expansion from City Hall to Edina P ublic Schools with Michels _____ for $124,582. INTRODUCTION: This is a request for purchase for the installation of a fiber optic network connection along Vernon Avenue between City Hall and a fiber run that we have access to as a result of a fiber sharing agreement with the Edina Public Schools, and connecting to Well 7. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Fiber Optic Network Expansion City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Date: August 18, 2020 To: Mayor and Council From: Ryan Browning, I.T. Director Subject: Request for Purchase: Fiber Optic Expansion Purchase Subject to: ☒List Quote/Bid ☐State Contract ☐Service Contract The Recommended Bid is: ☐Within Budget ☒Not Within Budget Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date: July 21, 2020 NA Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Michels Power Electrical Production Services Castrejon, Inc. Comlink Midwest $84,042.00 + $40,540.00 in Materials $84,847.00 + $40,540.00 in Materials $120,580.00 + $40,540.00 in Materials $134,686.00 + $40,540.00 in Materials Recommended Quote or Bid: Michels Power $124,582.00 ($84,042.00 + $40,540.00 in Materials) Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________ City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only) Budget Impact This is a request for purchase for the installation of a fiber optic network connection along Vernon Avenue between City Hall and a fiber run that we have access to as a result of a fiber sharing agreement with the Edina Public Schools and connecting to Well 7. This expense will be paid for out of Utility Funds and the Construction Fund as part of Capital Improvement Project 15-184 as well as an additional allocation out of the Construction Fund. Staff recommends the City proceed with this purchase. The lifespan of a fiber optic link is typically considered to be 25 years This link will be a major improvement to the redundancy of the Edina fiber network and will reduce the risk of disruption of critical City services in the event of a failure or cut along the current path. These improvements are important ahead of the upcoming Utilities systems upgrade. Additionally, by completing the redundancy connection and the Well 7 connection at the same time we are able to reduce costs. Environmental Impact This item should have a minimal environmental impact. Community Impact The City of Edina maintains an extensive fiber network that connects its various facilities. This network provides high-speed, secure, reliable and redundant connections to our facilities. This network provides critical links to all City systems and data including: Utility systems, Public Safety systems and point of sale systems at our various enterprise facilities. These connections also allow for improved security via access control, building monitoring and security cameras. This request will reduce the likelihood of a single failure leading to an outage of critical systems. Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Josh Furbish, General Manager – Liquor Operations Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Security Cameras for Edina Liquor Stores Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase with Pro-Tec Design for Security Cameras for Edina Liquor Stores for $69,866.63. INTRODUCTION: This purchase request is to replace the existing surveillance systems at both Grandview and 50th & France Liquor Store locations. ATTACHMENTS: Description Purchase Request: Security Cameras for Edina Liquor Stores City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Date: August 18, 2020 To: Mayor and City Council From: Josh Furbish, General Manager – Liquor Operations Subject: Request for Purchase: Security Cameras for Edina Liquor Store Purchase Subject to: ☐List Quote/Bid ☐State Contract ☒Service Contract The Recommended Bid is: ☒Within Budget ☐Not Within Budget This purchase request is to replace the existing surveillance systems at both Grandview and 50th & France Liquor Store locations. The existing systems are beyond their useful technology life and are not operating. Staff recommends contracting with Pro-Tech Design for this work. Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date: July 20, 2020 August 20, 2020 Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Pro-Tec Design Pro-Tec Design $30,529.07 (50th and France Location) $39,337.56 (Grandview Location) $69,866.63 (Total Purchase Request) Recommended Quote or Bid: Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________ City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only) Budget Impact This work was originally budgeted for 2021 but will reprogrammed to 2020 and remain to be paid for by the Edina Liquor Store enterprise fund. Sufficient fund balances remain for this purchase. This project will coincide with the security upgrades planned for and recently approved by the Facility Division for the south parking ramp in the 50th and France business district. Environmental Impact There are no environmental impacts to this purchase. The existing technology that is being replaced will be disposed of in accordance with requirements by the vendor. Community Impact This work is anticipated to have an immediate and long-lasting positive impact for the operations of the Edina Liquor stores. Customers and local businesses desire to have a safe business environment. Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.G. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Brian E. Olson, Director of Public Works Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Well No. 19 Rehabilitation Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase with Bergerson-Caswell, Inc. for rehabilitation of Well No. 19 for $18,721. INTRODUCTION: This purchase is for the rehabilitation of Well No. 19. See attached Request for Purchase. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Well No. 19 Rehabilitation City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Date: August 18, 2020 To: Mayor and City Council From: Brian Olson, Director of Public Works Subject: Request for Purchase: Well No. 9 Rehabilitation Purchase Subject to: ☒List Quote/Bid ☐State Contract ☐Service Contract The Recommended Bid is: ☒Within Budget ☐Not Within Budget Bergerson-Caswell, Inc. $18,721.00 Well No. 19 is a seasonal well located on the Edina Valley View Middle School campus. The well has reached one billion gallons pumped since last rehab and needs scheduled maintenance. Quotes are based on lump sum and unit pricing. Staff does not anticipate total actual cost to exceed $70,000.00. Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date: August 6, 2020 October 6, 2020 Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Bergerson-Caswell, Inc. Keys Well Drilling Co. E.H. Renner & Sons, Inc. $18,721.00 $20,881.00 $21,588.00 Recommended Quote or Bid: Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________ City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only) Budget Impact • Funding Source – Utility Fund: Water • Replacement of existing pump and components Environmental Impact • N/A Community Impact • Well No. 19 is a seasonal well providing clean, safe water to our resident and working populations. Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.H. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Ross Bintner P.E., Engineering Services Manager Item Activity: Subject:Approve Cooperative Agreement with Nine Mile Creek Watershed for Rosland Park Clean Water Project Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Cooperative Agreement with Nine Mile Creek Watershed for Rosland Park Clean Water Project. INTRODUCTION: This project was presented at the July 21 meeting. The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District proposes the creation of a filtration vault at Rosland Park to filter surface water to remove pollutants and improve downstream water quality in Lakes Cornelia and Edina. The attached agreement defines the terms for the construction by the District, and ownership operation and maintenance by the City. Staff has met with concerned residents on Lake Otto. The agreement outlines the Districts promise to complete analysis of rough fish management in upstream Lakes Nancy and Otto as well as internal phosphorus loading. The agreement also requires consultation with Edina staff to assess options to minimize potential affects to lake levels in Lake Otto. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Approve Cooperative Agreement with NMCW for Rosland Park Clean Water Project Cooperative Agreement Feasibility Report August 18, 2020 Mayor and City Council Chad A. Millner, P.E. Director of Engineering Approve Cooperative Agreement with Nine Mile Creek Watershed for Rosland Park Clean Water Project Information / Background: Excess phosphorus in Lake Cornelia is causing algal blooms and poor water quality. The source of the phosphorus is stormwater runoff, phosphorus-rich lake bottom sediments, and decaying invasive aquatic plants. 2019 Lake Study The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District completed a lake study in 2019 to evaluate management practices to improve water quality. Several of the recommended in-lake management practices to reduce release of phosphorus from lake bottom sediments have been implemented including aluminum treatment (completed in spring 2020), investigating sediment phosphorus release in Lake Otto and Lake Nancy (planned for 2021), curly leaf pondweed control (ongoing), and management of non-native fish (initiated in 2020). The 2019 study also recommended reducing phosphorus in stormwater runoff from the watershed. Lake Cornelia receives stormwater runoff from a large, highly developed watershed that includes the Southdale Neighborhood. Proposed Project The proposed project to manage phosphorus in stormwater runoff from the watershed is a stormwater filtration vault in Rosland Park (figures included). Water would be pumped from Swimming Pool Pond to the stormwater vault. Filter media in the vault would remove phosphorus from the water as it passes through the treatment system. Lake Otto and Swimming Pool Pond impacts Lake Otto and Swimming Pool Pond are connected by large storm pipes, so water levels are the same. The agreement requires the District to consult Edina staff to assess options to minimize the potential for the project to affect water levels in Lake Otto. The District has also agreed to analyze rough fish management and internal phosphorus loading on Lakes Otto and Nancy. City of Edina- [8/22/20] Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Rosland Park BMP Project 1 Cooperative Agreement Between City of Edina and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for the ROSLAND PARK CLEAN WATER PROJECT This cooperative agreement is made by and between the City of Edina (Edina), a Minnesota municipal corporation, and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (NMCWD), a watershed district with purposes and powers set forth in Minnesota Statutes chapters 103B and 103D, to achieve shared goals for improving water quality in Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina through design, construction and operation and maintenance of the Rosland Park Clean Water Project. RECITALS Whereas NMCWD has authority under chapters 103B and 103D to design and implement projects to improve water quality and protect water resources within the Nine Mile Creek watershed; Whereas Edina owns and operates Rosland Park, a recreational and natural area that borders Lake Cornelia and is upstream of Lake Edina, both of which have been listed by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency as “impaired” for the designated use of aquatic recreation due to excess nutrients (phosphorus); Whereas Edina and NMCWD executed a memorandum of understanding on September 17, 2019, memorializing the parties’ commitment to collaborating on development and implementation of water-resource protection and improvement projects in that portion of the city within the Nine Mile Creek watershed; Whereas NMCWD has completed and approved an update to the use-attainability analysis for Lake Cornelia and a use-attainability analysis for Lake Edina, which supported NMCWD’s application of alum compounds to reduce phosphorus levels in Lake Cornelia in spring 2020, and Edina also has undertaken efforts to improve water quality in the lake by managing curly-leaf pondweed, a significant source of phosphorus; Whereas NMCWD has an approved water-resources management plan pursuant to Minnesota Statutes chapter 103B, and in fulfillment of a goal of the plan, NMCWD completed in June 2020 – with the benefit of input and guidance from Edina engineering, public works and parks staff – a study of the feasibility of various additional options for improving water quality in Lake Edina and Lake Cornelia, and the study recommended design, construction, and operation and maintenance of an above-ground three- chambered filtration system in Rosland Park, drawing water from Swimming Pool Pond, which is also in Rosland Park and owned by Edina, and discharging to Lake Cornelia (the Project) at a cost of approximately $744,000, and the NMCWD engineer estimates that the Project would reduce phosphorus loading to the lakes by an average of approximately 22 pounds each year; City of Edina- [8/22/20] Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Rosland Park BMP Project 2 Whereas the NMCWD Board of Managers, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 103B.251, subdivisions 3 and 4, duly noticed and conducted a public hearing on July 15, 2020, on the Project, to provide all interested parties with an opportunity to comment on the Project, and no comments were provided; Whereas NMCWD is pursuing grant funding for the Project; Whereas on August 19, 2020, the NMCWD Board of Managers ordered, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes section 103B.251, the construction of the Project, and designated that NMCWD’s portion of the costs of the Project should be secured through a levy on property within the Nine Mile Creek watershed pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 103B.241; Whereas in conjunction with and simultaneously with the construction of the Project, NMCWD will complete analysis of rough fish management in Lake Cornelia and upstream lakes Nancy and Otto, as well as internal phosphorus loading in upstream Lake Nancy and Lake Otto, and will develop for NMCWD board consideration options for fisheries management in Lake Cornelia and the upstream lakes and reduction of internal loading in the upstream lakes, as well as other water-quality improvement practices in the Lake Edina watershed; and Whereas Edina and NMCWD are authorized by Minnesota Statutes section 471.59 to enter into this cooperative agreement for the Project. Now, therefore, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, which are incorporated into and made a part of this agreement, and other good and valuable consideration, Edina and NMCWD enter into this cooperative agreement to document their understanding as to the scope of the Project, affirm their commitments as to responsibility for tasks to be undertaken, grant and assign the property rights necessary, establish procedures for performing these tasks and fulfilling responsibilities, and facilitate communication and cooperation to ensure successful completion of the Project to improve water quality in Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina. AGREEMENT 1. DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT – construction, operation and maintenance of a filtration system in Rosland Park A. Project design and specification. NMCWD will contract with the NMCWD engineer, Barr Engineering, for the preparation of a design, plans and specifications for acquisition and installation of the necessary material for and construction of the filtration system and related monitoring equipment in Rosland Park, and the contract will require the NMCWD engineer, in consultation with Edina staff, to assess options to minimize the potential for the Project to affect water levels in Lake Otto and the assessment will inform the 90 percent complete plans and specifications, which NMCWD will provide to Edina for review and approval in accordance with paragraph 2A of this agreement. The City of Edina- [8/22/20] Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Rosland Park BMP Project 3 plans and specifications will serve as the primary technical specifications in the contract documents prepared in accordance with this subsection 1A for purposes of solicitation of bids for acquisition and installation of materials necessary for and construction of the Project. The design, plans and specifications will provide for: i. Mobilization and site preparation; ii. Delineation of definitive geographic and temporal limitations on the nature and extent of clearing and grubbing and other land-disturbing activities in Rosland Park; iii. Specification, acquisition and installation of the piping, control valves, utilities, pump and related infrastructure, and filtration media necessary to draw and filter water from Swimming Pool Pond and discharge treated water into the existing storm sewer system between Swimming Pool Pond and Lake Cornelia, as well as the vault structure containing the treatment media and associated infrastructure (altogether referred to herein as “the Filtration System”), and all devices and equipment necessary to allow NMCWD and Edina to monitor performance of the Filtration System; iv. Restoration of Rosland Park, including seeding/planting and establishment of turf, replacement of pavement and other steps as necessary to ensure continued compatibility and functionality in keeping with the continued use of Rosland Park for its intended and customary purposes. The designs, plans and specifications also will include an exhibit delineating the access, construction and maintenance areas in Rosland Park for purposes of Edina’s grant of property-use rights for the Project as provided in paragraph 2B. The design, plans and specifications will include the design of the Filtration System, including the exterior of and landscaping around the vault structure, but will not include art, park signage, lighting or other accessory elements. The design, plans and specifications, when approved pursuant to paragraph 2A herein, define and are referred to herein as the Contracted Work, and are, on approval, incorporated into and become a term of this agreement. The Contracted Work is a part of and entirely incorporated into the Project. B. Implementation of the Contracted Work. On Edina’s approval of the design, plans and specifications as provided in paragraph 2A herein, NMCWD will contract, in accordance with applicable public procurement law, for the conduct of the Contracted Work. i. NMCWD will require in contracting for the Contracted Work that: a. The contractor restrict all of its activities to the portions of Rosland Park designated for access and construction by Edina in accordance with subsection 1A and paragraph 2B herein. City of Edina- [8/22/20] Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Rosland Park BMP Project 4 b. The contractor name Edina as an additional insured for general liability with primary and noncontributory coverage for general liability and provide a certificate showing same prior to start of construction. c. The contractor indemnify, defend and hold harmless Edina, its officers, employees and agents from any and all actions, costs, damages and liabilities of any nature arising from the contractor’s negligent or otherwise wrongful act or omission, or breach of a specific contractual duty, or a subcontractor’s negligent or otherwise wrongful act or omission, or breach of a specific contractual duty owed by the contractor to NMCWD. d. The contractor and any manufacturers extend all warranties under the agreement to Edina. e. The contractor determine and obtain all permits and other regulatory approvals applicable to the Contracted Work on behalf of NMCWD and Edina, except as may be specified in the contract documents as the responsibility of NMCWD, in collaboration with Edina. f. The contractor timely provide NMCWD with certification of the Contracted Work as substantially complete for the intended purposes. ii. Either NMCWD or the NMCWD engineer on NMCWD’s behalf will provide construction oversight for and otherwise oversee implementation of the Contracted Work. NMCWD may adjust the plans and specifications for the Contracted Work during implementation, as long as the revisions: a. Do not require NMCWD to exceed the scope of the rights granted to it under this agreement; b. are made in consultation with Edina to ensure compatibility of the Contracted Work with Edina’ continued use and operation of Rosland Park for its customary public recreational purposes; and c. do not expand Edina’s operations and maintenance responsibilities or its costs to fulfill same under this agreement; unless Edina approves any such changes in writing. iii. NMCWD will timely engage and consult Edina on material changes to the plans and specifications for the Contracted Work, if any. iv. Until substantial completion of the Contracted Work for the purposes intended, if NMCWD, in its judgment, should decide that the Project is infeasible, NMCWD, at its option, may declare the agreement rescinded City of Edina- [8/22/20] Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Rosland Park BMP Project 5 and annulled. If NMCWD so declares, all obligations herein, performed or not, will be voided and, if land-disturbing activities for the Project have commenced, NMCWD will return the Property materially to its prior condition or to a condition agreed to in writing by Edina and NMCWD. v. NMCWD will notify Edina within five business days of receipt of a certification of substantial completion from the contractor contracted to implement the Contracted Work. C. Operation and maintenance planning and implementation. The Project includes and the parties will collaborate on the operation and maintenance of the Filtration System and associated monitoring equipment in accordance with the following: i. NMCWD will contract with the NMCWD engineer for the development, in collaboration with Edina, of specific written procedures and protocols for operation and maintenance and monitoring the performance of the Filtration System (the O&M Plan). The O&M Plan will provide, at a minimum, for: a. Specification of routine operation and maintenance of the Filtration System, including electrical requirements, operation of the pump, operation of a skimmer and ongoing maintenance – but not replacement – of the treatment media in the Filtration System to maintain designed functionality; b. Performance tracking and reporting of volumes treated by the Filtration System. NMCWD, or the NMCWD engineer on NMCWD’s behalf, will submit the final draft O&M Plan for Edina’s review and approval in accordance with paragraph 2D herein. ii. Edina will complete or contract for the routine operation and maintenance of the Project in accordance with the O&M Plan, once approved pursuant to paragraph 2D herein, and will provide at its sole expense the electrical power necessary for the Project. iii. NMCWD will complete or contract for the completion of startup; monitoring of performance, functionality and effectiveness of the Treatment System; troubleshooting and adjustment of the functionality of the Filtration System in the first two years after certification of the Contracted Work as substantially complete. iv. NMCWD will complete or contract for the completion of major maintenance and repair of the Contracted Work, as necessary, for the two years after the date the Contracted Work is determined to be substantially complete for the intended purposes, and Edina will City of Edina- [8/22/20] Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Rosland Park BMP Project 6 complete or contract for the completion of major maintenance and repair of the Contracted Work thereafter. a. “Major maintenance and repair,” as used herein, is defined as removal and replacement of the treatment media in the Filtration System and all activities not encompassed within the O&M Plan’s specification of routine operation and maintenance. v. NMCWD will complete or timely contract for performance assurance, monitoring of the performance including functionality and effectiveness, troubleshooting and adjustment of the Filtration System starting two years after substantial completion of the Contracted Work. D. Education and outreach, publicity and endorsement. Edina and NMCWD will collaborate on development and production of outreach, education and publicity materials regarding the Project. NMCWD and Edina will collaborate on the development of educational and informational signage pertinent to the Project, and either party, at its cost, may develop, produce and distribute educational, outreach and publicity materials related to the Project, and may install, maintain, replace or remove signage in Rosland Park related to the Project. All such signage and materials, whether produced by NMCWD or Edina, will include acknowledgement of the funding and participation of the other party in the Project and of any grant funding received for the Project. For purposes of this paragraph, “publicity” includes notices, informational printed materials, press releases, research reports, signs and other public notices, whether electronic or printed. E. Ownership of the Contracted Work. On completion of the Contracted Work, ownership of all equipment and materials installed on and incorporated into Rosland Park for the Project will vest in Edina. F. Costs. Except as specifically provided herein, each of the parties will bear the costs of enforcing its rights and fulfilling its responsibilities under this agreement, as well as incidental costs. And in the event of cancellation, the parties will bear all costs incurred by each of them prior to NMCWD’s issuance of notice to Edina in accordance with paragraph 1B.iv herein. i. NMCWD will be responsible for costs as follows: a. All costs of design and construction management of the Project and development of the O&M Plan; b. All costs of work for project startup and performance assessment, troubleshooting and adjustment in accordance with paragraph 1C.iii herein; c. All costs of major maintenance and repair initiated in the first two years after the date of substantial completion and 30 percent of costs of major repair initiated two years or more after the date of substantial completion of the Contracted Work; City of Edina- [8/22/20] Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Rosland Park BMP Project 7 d. All costs of startup, monitoring and performance adjustment of the Project in accordance with 1C.v herein in the first two years after substantial completion of the Contracted Work, and 70 percent of costs of performance monitoring, troubleshooting and adjustment of the Project starting two years after substantial completion of the Contracted Work. ii. Edina will be responsible for costs as follows: a. All costs of routine operation and maintenance of the Project as defined by and in accordance with the O&M Plan, including the electrical power needed for Project operation; b. 30 percent of the costs of monitoring and performance adjustment of the Project, and 70 percent of the costs of major repair of the Project initiated two years or more after substantial completion of the Contracted Work. In addition, Edina will contribute the property access and use rights necessary for the Project at no out-of-pocket cost to NMCWD. iii. The party responsible for the majority of any cost identified herein will be reimbursed by the other party for the portion of such cost for which it is responsible, and will submit documentation of costs to support reimbursement, which will be rendered within 35 days of submission of all necessary documentation. 2. EDINA’S FURTHER RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES, AND GRANT OF RIGHTS FOR ACCESS, CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE A. Edina will have 15 days after receipt to review and approve the 90 percent complete design, plans and specifications for the Contracted Work provided in accordance with paragraph 1A herein. Failure to act within the specified time will constitute approval. In addition to its right to consult on the development of the O&M Plan, Edina will have 60 days from receipt to review and approve the final draft O&M Plan submitted in accordance with paragraph 1C.i herein. Failure to act within the specified time will constitute approval. Edina’s approvals under this agreement will not be unreasonably withheld. B. Grant of easement. Edina hereby grants to NMCWD, its contractors, agents and assigns a nonexclusive term easement to access and use the portions of Rosland Park necessary for access, construction and maintenance of the Project as delineated in the 90 percent design, plans and specifications for the Contracted Work prepared in accordance with paragraph 1X herein, and otherwise as necessary to fulfill NMCWD’s obligations and exercise its rights under this agreement. NMCWD, on reasonable notice to and with the assistance of Edina, may temporarily restrict or preclude public access to portions of Rosland Park to ensure safety while construction or maintenance activities are under way. City of Edina- [8/22/20] Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Rosland Park BMP Project 8 i. Notwithstanding that the grant of an easement specified above is nonexclusive, Edina agrees that it will forbear from any activity that unreasonably interferes with NMCWD’s ability to exercise its rights or meet its obligations under this agreement, including the transfer of ownership of Rosland Park. Subject to its interest in preserving public safety, Edina will facilitate NMCWD’s reasonable exercise of its rights under this agreement with regard to access to and use of Rosland Park, including but not limited to the right to place signage within Rosland Park to facilitate effective implementation of the Project. Edina will not take any action within or adjacent to Rosland Park that could reasonably be expected to diminish the effectiveness or function of the Project for the purposes intended. C. The Project will include the basic design and construction of the Filtration System, but Edina will retain sole authority over and financial and other responsibility for the development and implementation of plans and specifications for art, park signage, lighting and other accessory elements in Rosland Park related to the Filtration System. Edina will forbear from any activity that interferes with the NMCWD's ability to exercise its rights or meet its obligations under this agreement, including but not limited to Edina’s conveyance of ownership of the Rosland Park. Edina will facilitate NMCWD’s reasonable exercise of its rights under this agreement with regard to access to and use of Rosland Park. Edina will not take any action within Rosland Park that could reasonably be expected to diminish the effectiveness or function of the Project for the purposes intended. D. Edina, as owner of Rosland Park, will cooperate with NMCWD’s and its contractor’s efforts to obtain permits and approvals needed for the Project and authorizes NMCWD to apply for such permits and approvals on its behalf. Edina, in its regulatory capacity, will facilitate the proper and efficient processing of any permits and approvals needed for the Project. i. Beginning two years after the date of certification of substantial completion of the Constructed Work, Edina will be responsible for obtaining any new or renewed permits or approvals from the State of Minnesota required for continued operation of the Project. E. Edina may conduct data-collection and analysis on the performance of the Project or utilize data collected by either of the parties under the terms of this agreement with regard to reduction of loading of phosphorus and other pollutants to Lake Cornelia, and may apply any and all credit generated by the Project toward its obligations, goals and requirements imposed by state or federal regulatory programs, such as the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System as applied to Edina. F. Edina will cooperate with NMCWD in all communications and outreach to property owners affected by the Project. City of Edina- [8/22/20] Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Rosland Park BMP Project 9 3. NMCWD’S FURTHER RIGHTS AND COMMITMENTS A. As between the parties and with the exception specified in paragraph 2D.i herein, NMCWD will obtain all necessary permits, licenses and approvals, and will ensure that the Project is completed in accordance with applicable law and regulatory standards and criteria. B. After approval by Edina of the 90 percent design, plans and specifications as provided in paragraph 2A herein, NMCWD will contract with the NMCWD engineer for the development of the final design, plans and specifications for the Construction Work and the Project. Notwithstanding the foregoing, NMCWD makes no warranty to Edina regarding the NMCWD engineer’s or another third party’s performance in design, construction or construction management for the Project. C. NMCWD will contract for the construction of the Contracted Work in accordance with applicable public-procurement law, as determined by NMCWD. 4. GENERAL TERMS A. Independent Relationship; Liability. This agreement does not create a joint powers board or organization within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes section 471.59. Each party agrees that it will be responsible only for its own acts and the results thereof to the extent authorized by the law and will not be responsible for the acts or omissions of the other party and the results thereof. This agreement creates no right in and waives no immunity, defense or liability limitation with respect to any third party. As between the parties, only contract remedies are available for a breach of this agreement. B. Edina and NMCWD enter this agreement solely for the purposes of construction and maintenance of the Project to improve water quality in Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina. NMCWD does not have, has not had, and will not be deemed to have acquired by entry into or performance under this agreement, any form of interest or ownership in or to any portion of Rosland Park. NMCWD does not exercise, has not exercised, and will not by entry into or performance under this agreement be deemed to have exercised, any form of control over the use, operation or management of any portion of Rosland Park or property adjacent to Rosland Park prior to the commencement of construction of the Project such as would render NMCWD a potentially responsible party for any contamination under state or federal law. C. Complete agreement. This agreement, as it may be amended in writing, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties for the Project. Any amendment to this agreement must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed City of Edina- [8/22/20] Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Rosland Park BMP Project 10 and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original agreement or their successors in office. D. Notice; Coordination. The parties designate the following authorized representatives to serve as the liaison to the other party for purposes of coordination of all work involved in or related to the Project as provided in this agreement. Any written communication required under this agreement will be addressed to the other party as follows, except that either party may change its address for notice by so notifying the other party in writing: To Edina: Director Engineering City of Edina 7450 Metro Blvd. Edina MN 55439 952-826-0371 Director Parks and Recreation City of Edina 4801 West 50th St. Edina MN 55424 952-826-0367 To NMCWD: Administrator Nine Mile Creek Watershed District 12800 Gerard Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55346 952-835-2078 E. Waivers. The waiver by Edina or NMCWD of any breach or failure to comply with any provision of this agreement by the other party will not be construed as nor will it constitute a continuing waiver of such provision or a waiver of any other breach of or failure to comply with any other provision of this agreement. F. Term and termination. This agreement will remain effective when fully executed and will remain in force for 30 years from the date of complete execution, unless terminated by mutual agreement of the parties or otherwise in accordance with the terms of this agreement. [Signature page follows.] City of Edina- [8/22/20] Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Rosland Park BMP Project 11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement, intending to be legally bound. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota ___________________________ Date: ______________________ By Robert Cutshall Its President Approved as to form and execution _____________________________ NMCWD Counsel City of Edina a Minnesota municipal corporation ___________________________ Date: ___________________________ By James Hovland Its Mayor ___________________________ Date: ___________________________ By Scott Neal Its City Manager 4300 MarketPointe Drive, Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55435 952.832.2600 www.barr.com Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina Water Quality Improvement Project Feasibility Study/Preliminary Engineering Report Photo by Larry Olson Prepared for Nine Mile Creek Watershed District June 2020 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271725 Lake Cornelia WQ Improvements\_01 Lake Cornelia WQ Improvement Feasibility\WorkFiles\Feasibility Study Report\Lake Cornelia_Draft Feasibility Study Report_v2d2.docx i Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina Water Quality Improvement Project Feasibility Study/Preliminary Engineering Report June 2020 Contents 1 Introduction and Project Background ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Background ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina Overview ............................................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Lake Cornelia ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1.1 Lake Cornelia Characteristics .......................................................................................................................... 3 2.1.2 Watershed Characteristics ............................................................................................................................... 3 2.1.3 Lake Cornelia Water Quality ........................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Lake Edina ............................................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Lake Edina and Watershed Characteristics ............................................................................................... 6 2.2.2 Lake Edina Water Quality ................................................................................................................................. 6 3 Summary of Evaluated Management Practices ............................................................................................................... 7 4 Stormwater Treatment in Rosland Park .............................................................................................................................. 8 4.1 Conceptual Design Options............................................................................................................................................. 9 4.2 Feasibility Analysis/Preliminary Design ....................................................................................................................... 9 4.2.1 Site Characterization ........................................................................................................................................10 4.2.1.1 Swimming Pool Pond Outlet Structure ...............................................................................12 4.2.1.2 Lake Otto Outlet ...........................................................................................................................12 4.2.1.3 Point of France Pond Outlet Structure ................................................................................12 4.2.1.4 Water Quality in Swimming Pool Pond ...............................................................................12 4.2.2 Design Considerations ....................................................................................................................................14 4.2.2.1 Filtration Vault Size and Aesthetics .......................................................................................14 4.2.2.2 Treatment Pumping Rate ..........................................................................................................19 4.2.2.3 Daily and Annual Treatment Duration .................................................................................19 4.2.2.4 Pumped Drawdown Depths of Swimming Pool Pond and Lake Otto ....................19 4.2.2.5 Filtration Media Selection and Pollutant Removal Effectiveness ..............................22 4.2.2.6 Operations and Maintenance ..................................................................................................24 ii 4.2.3 Water Quality Benefits ....................................................................................................................................25 4.2.4 Permitting.............................................................................................................................................................26 4.2.5 Opinion of Probable Cost ..............................................................................................................................26 4.2.6 Cost-Benefit Analysis .......................................................................................................................................28 5 Other Watershed Best Management Practices (BMPs) ...............................................................................................29 5.1 Stormwater BMP Retrofit Opportunities in Lake Edina Watershed ...............................................................30 5.1.1 Opinion of Probable Cost ..............................................................................................................................32 5.1.2 Cost-Benefit Analysis .......................................................................................................................................32 5.2 Opportunities for Treatment of Ponds Upstream of Lake Cornelia...............................................................32 6 Curly-leaf Pondweed Management ....................................................................................................................................35 6.1 Annual Herbicide Treatments .......................................................................................................................................35 6.1.1 Permitting.............................................................................................................................................................36 6.1.2 Opinion of Probable Cost ..............................................................................................................................36 6.2 Lake Drawdown ..................................................................................................................................................................36 6.2.1 Background on Drawdown as Management Method ........................................................................37 6.2.2 Drawdown Method ..........................................................................................................................................38 6.2.3 Lake Drawdown Analysis ................................................................................................................................40 6.2.3.1 Drawdown Timing ........................................................................................................................40 6.2.3.2 Maintaining Winter Drawdown Conditions .......................................................................41 6.2.4 Permitting.............................................................................................................................................................42 6.2.5 Opinion of Probable Cost ..............................................................................................................................44 6.2.6 Other Drawdown Considerations ...............................................................................................................44 7 Fishery Management ................................................................................................................................................................46 7.1 Overview of Lake Cornelia Fishery ..............................................................................................................................46 7.2 Goldfish Literature Review .............................................................................................................................................46 7.2.1 Influence of Goldfish ........................................................................................................................................48 7.2.2 Hybridization .......................................................................................................................................................48 7.2.3 Goldfish Control Methods .............................................................................................................................48 7.2.3.1 Removal ...........................................................................................................................................48 7.2.3.2 Biologic (Predation) .....................................................................................................................48 7.2.3.3 Drawdown .......................................................................................................................................49 7.2.3.4 Reduced Access to Spawning Areas .....................................................................................49 7.2.3.5 Chemical control ...........................................................................................................................49 7.2.3.6 Winterkill Mitigation ...................................................................................................................49 iii 7.3 Recommended Goldfish and Carp Management Approach ............................................................................49 7.4 Winter Aeration to Prevent Fish Kill ...........................................................................................................................50 7.4.1 Aeration Methods Considered.....................................................................................................................50 7.4.1.1 Full Lift Aeration ............................................................................................................................50 7.4.1.2 Full Lift Oxygenation ...................................................................................................................51 7.4.1.3 Oxygen Enhanced Full Lift Aeration ......................................................................................51 7.4.1.4 Side Stream Saturation ..............................................................................................................51 7.4.2 Recommended Aeration Method ...............................................................................................................51 7.4.3 Permitting.............................................................................................................................................................52 7.4.4 Opinion of Probable Cost ..............................................................................................................................54 7.5 Stocking .................................................................................................................................................................................54 7.5.1 Permitting.............................................................................................................................................................56 7.5.2 Costs .......................................................................................................................................................................56 7.6 Additional Monitoring .....................................................................................................................................................56 8 Lake Management Conclusions and Recommendations ...........................................................................................57 8.1 Stormwater Treatment in Rosland Park ....................................................................................................................57 8.2 Other Watershed BMP Opportunities .......................................................................................................................59 8.2.1 Stormwater BMP Retrofit Opportunities in Lake Edina Watershed ..............................................59 8.2.2 Opportunities for Treatment of Ponds Upstream of Lake Cornelia ..............................................60 8.3 Curly-leaf Pondweed Management............................................................................................................................61 8.3.1 Annual Herbicide Treatments ......................................................................................................................62 8.3.2 Lake Drawdown .................................................................................................................................................62 8.3.3 Curly-Leaf Management Recommendation ...........................................................................................63 8.4 Fishery Management ........................................................................................................................................................63 8.4.1 Fish Management Recommendations ......................................................................................................63 8.4.2 Winter Aeration..................................................................................................................................................64 8.4.3 Goldfish and Carp Removal ..........................................................................................................................64 8.4.4 Stocking ................................................................................................................................................................65 8.4.5 Additional Monitoring .....................................................................................................................................65 9 References .....................................................................................................................................................................................66 iv List of Tables Table 4-1 Summary of Water Quality Data for Swimming Pool Pond from May through September 2018 ............................................................................................................................................... 13 Table 4-2 Summary of Amount of Water Pumped/Treated by Proposed Filtration Vault ...................... 20 Table 4-3 Summary of Water Level Fluctuation in Swimming Pool Pond and Lake Otto under Recommended Pumping Scenario ............................................................................................................ 22 Table 4-4 Summary of Evaluated Filtration Media .................................................................................................. 24 Table 4-5 Rosland Park Treatment Vault Total Phosphorus Removal Summary ........................................ 26 Table 4-6 Rosland Park Treatment Vault Feasibility-Level Cost Estimates .................................................... 28 Table 4-7 Rosland Park Treatment Vault Feasibility-Level Cost Estimates .................................................... 28 Table 5-1 Lake Edina Watershed Infiltration-BMPs Watershed and Sizing Summary .............................. 30 Table 5-2 Lake Edina Watershed Infiltration-BMP Concept-Level Cost Estimates ..................................... 32 Table 6-1 Time to Draw Down Lake to Elevation 851 Assuming no Inflows ................................................ 40 Table 6-2 Summary of Estimated Costs for Lake Drawdown, Assuming 3,000 gpm Pump Capacity . 45 Table 7-1 Summary of Estimated Costs for Winter Aeration .............................................................................. 54 Table 8-1 Rosland Park Treatment Vault Feasibility-Level Cost Estimate ...................................................... 58 Table 8-2 Lake Edina Watershed Infiltration-BMP Concept-Level Cost Estimates ..................................... 60 List of Figures Figure 1-1 Project Location ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2-1 Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina Watersheds ............................................................................................... 4 Figure 2-2 Summer average phosphorus concentrations in Lake Cornelia (North Basin) have historically been well above the state standard for shallow lakes................................................... 5 Figure 2-3 Photos of Blue-green Algae in Lake Cornelia (North Basin) (2017) ................................................ 5 Figure 2-4 Summer average phosphorus concentrations in Lake Edina have historically been above the state standard for shallow lakes .............................................................................................. 6 Figure 4-1 Runoff from approximately 410-acres, shown in yellow, flows through Swimming Pool Pond ......................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Figure 4-2 Rosland Park BMP Site Characterization ................................................................................................. 11 Figure 4-3 Swimming Pool Pond Sampling Site 3 (Epilimnion) TP Concentrations and Percent TDP and SRP over time ........................................................................................................................................... 14 Figure 4-4 Location of the Proposed Filtration Vault System in Rosland Park .............................................. 15 Figure 4-5 Rendering showing the approximate size and location of the concrete filtration vault with limestone facing on vault walls ........................................................................................................ 16 Figure 4-6 Rendering showing the concrete filtration vault with partially-buried vault walls and a low limestone wall ........................................................................................................................................... 17 Figure 4-7 Rendering showing the concrete filtration vault with tiered wall planted with shrubs and flowering plants ....................................................................................................................................... 17 v Figure 4-8 Rendering showing the concrete filtration vault with tiered wall planted with native grasses .................................................................................................................................................................. 18 Figure 4-9 Lake Otto Inundation Extents Comparison ............................................................................................ 21 Figure 4-10 Plan View of Three-Chamber Filtration Vault ....................................................................................... 22 Figure 4-11 Riparian Landowners to Swimming Pool Pond and Lake Otto ...................................................... 27 Figure 5-1 Potential Stormwater BMPs, Lake Edina Watershed .......................................................................... 31 Figure 6-1 Curly-leaf Pondweed Presence at Sampled Sites from 2017 to 2020 ......................................... 36 Figure 6-2 Drawdown Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 39 Figure 6-3 Drawdown Effectiveness of Various Pump Capacities, based on August 15 Start Date ...... 41 Figure 6-4 Effectiveness of Maintaining Drawdown Conditions during Winter Months ........................... 42 Figure 6-5 Lake Drawdown Riparian Property Owners ........................................................................................... 43 Figure 7-1 Lake Cornelia and Upstream Waterbodies ............................................................................................ 47 Figure 7-2 Main Components of the Side-stream Aeration System for Lake Cornelia .............................. 52 Figure 7-3 Potential Configuration of Aeration System ......................................................................................... 53 vi List of Appendices, Attachments, or Exhibits Appendix A December 18, 2019 presentation to NMCWD Board of Managers on Rosland Park BMP Conceptual Design Appendix B University of Minnesota Report: Assessment of Internal Phosphorus Loading in Swimming Pool Pond and Point of France Pond Appendix C Summary of Hydraulic Modeling Analysis for Rosland Park Stormwater Treatment BMP Appendix D Opinions of Probable Cost Appendix E Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations Appendix F WSB Carp and Goldfish Monitoring Scope vii Certifications I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. June 10, 2020 Janna Kieffer PE #: 43571 Date viii Acronyms µg/L microgram per liter AACE Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering BMP best management practice cfs cubic feet per second DWSMA Drinking Water Supply Management Area FIN Fishing in the Neighborhood GIS geographic information systems HP horsepower HSG hydrologic soil group LiDAR light detection and ranging MIDS Minimal Impact Design Standards MnDNR Minnesota Department of Natural Resources NMCWD Nine Mile Creek Watershed District NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service NWL normal water level RPBCWD Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District SAFL Saint Anthony Falls Laboratory SRP soluble reactive phosphorus TDP total dissolves phosphorus TP total phosphorus UAA Use Attainability Analysis VHS viral hemorrhagic septicemia YOY young of the year 1 1 Introduction and Project Background 1.1 Introduction This report summarizes and assesses the feasibility of potential actions for improving the water quality of Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina, located downstream of Lake Cornelia. It is prepared in response to a water quality study the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (NMCWD) completed for Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina in 2019 (Reference (1)). 1.2 Project Background The NMCWD was established by the Minnesota Water Resources Board in 1959 and consists of land that drains into Nine Mile Creek. The District encompasses approximately 50 square miles in southern Hennepin County and includes portions of the cities of Bloomington, Edina, Eden Prairie, Hopkins, Minnetonka, and Richfield (Figure 1-1). Nine Mile Creek has two branches; the north branch is fed by groundwater and stormwater and begins in Hopkins. The south branch originates in Minnetoga Lake and surrounding wetlands in Minnetonka. The north and south branches join north of Normandale Lake, just south of Interstate 494 in Bloomington. Lake Cornelia is located approximately 0.4 miles east of the north branch of Nine Mile Creek. Stormwater management within the urbanized Nine Mile Creek watershed was guided initially by the District’s Overall Plan dated March 1961. That plan was revised by the Watershed District in April 1973, as prescribed by the Minnesota Water Resources Board. The 1973 revised Overall Plan guided development in the District until it was further revised in May 1996, March 2007 and again in the 2017 Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Water Management Plan (amended 2018, 2019), in accordance with the Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act and Watershed Law: Minnesota Statutes Chapters 103B and 103D, respectively (Reference (2)). The water quality in Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina is often poor, primarily due to excess phosphorus in the lakes which fuels algal growth and decreases water clarity. The 2019 water quality study found that phosphorus in Lake Cornelia comes from several sources, including stormwater runoff from the watershed (external source) and internal sources such as nutrient-rich sediments and decomposition of invasive curly-leaf pondweed. The study found that phosphorus in Lake Edina primarily comes from stormwater runoff within the watershed and flows from upstream Lake Cornelia. The water quality study identified several recommendations to improve water quality in Lake Cornelia and downstream Lake Edina. This feasibility study report evaluates several water quality improvement approaches to address concerns associated with excess phosphorus in Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina as well as the prevalence of curly-leaf pondweed in Lake Cornelia. The report also evaluates options to revive a healthy native fish population in Lake Cornelia. LakeEdina Melody North LakeCornelia South LakeCornelia LakeNancy PamelaPond Birchcrest LakeOtto SwimmingPool Pond Point ofFrancePond 456731 456717 456717 456731 456731 456753 456717 100 62 100 62 100 Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Project LocationLake Cornelia and Lake Edina Water Quality Improvement ProjectEdina, Minnesota FIGURE 1-1 Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-06-02 17:27 File: I:\Client\Nine_Mile_Creek_WD\Work_Orders\23271725_Cornelia\Drawdown\Report\Fig1_1_Project_Location_Map_V2.mxd User: VAW0 600 1,200 1,800 Feet !;NMajor Watersheds Storm Sewer 3 2 Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina Overview The characteristics of Lake Cornelia, Lake Edina, and their watersheds are described in the following sections. 2.1 Lake Cornelia 2.1.1 Lake Cornelia Characteristics Lake Cornelia is a shallow lake with a northern and southern basin, which are connected by a storm sewer pipe beneath West 66th Street. North Cornelia, spanning 19 acres, has a maximum depth of 7 feet, and a mean depth of approximately 3 feet. South Cornelia, with a water surface area of 33 acres, has a maximum depth of 8 feet, and a mean depth of approximately 4 feet. Runoff that flows through Lake Cornelia drains to Lake Edina, which ultimately discharges into the North Fork of Nine Mile Creek. 2.1.2 Watershed Characteristics North Cornelia receives stormwater runoff from a relatively large watershed (863 acres) (Figure 2-1). Land use within the highly developed watershed includes a large commercial area (including the Southdale Shopping Center and Fairview Southdale Hospital), portions of Highway 62 and Highway 100, residential areas (high and low density), and Rosland Park. Most of the runoff from the highly impervious commercial area drains through a series of waterbodies (i.e., Point of France Pond and Swimming Pool Pond) prior to reaching North Cornelia. In addition to flows from North Cornelia, South Cornelia receives runoff from a relatively small, residential watershed (112 acres). 2.1.3 Lake Cornelia Water Quality Water quality in Lake Cornelia is poor, with summer-average total phosphorus and chlorophyll a concentrations well above the state standard for shallow lakes (Figure 2-2). The poor water quality is primarily due to excess phosphorus in the lake, which fuels algal growth and decreases water clarity (Figure 2-3). The phosphorus in Lake Cornelia comes from several sources, including stormwater runoff from the watershed (external source) and internal sources such as nutrient-rich sediments and decomposition of curly-leaf pondweed. Fish activity, specifically the disruption caused by bottom-feeding species such as bullhead, carp and goldfish, may also be decreasing water clarity. Additional information around these sources of phosphorus in Lake Cornelia can be found in the 2019 water quality study (Reference (1)). 4 Figure 2-1 Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina Watersheds 5 Figure 2-2 Summer average phosphorus concentrations in Lake Cornelia (North Basin) have historically been well above the state standard for shallow lakes Figure 2-3 Photos of Blue-green Algae in Lake Cornelia (North Basin) (2017) 6 2.2 Lake Edina 2.2.1 Lake Edina and Watershed Characteristics Lake Edina is a shallow, 25-acre lake with a maximum depth of 5 feet and a mean depth of approximately 3 feet. The Lake Edina watershed encompasses approximately 400 acres (Figure 2-1). Land use within the watershed is primarily low-density residential, with smaller portions of high-density residential, commercial, institutional (Cornelia Elementary School), and park. 2.2.2 Lake Edina Water Quality Water quality in Lake Edina, located downstream of Lake Cornelia, is also poor, with summer-average total phosphorus and chlorophyll a concentration generally not meeting the state standard for shallow lakes (Figure 2-4). Figure 2-4 Summer average phosphorus concentrations in Lake Edina have historically been above the state standard for shallow lakes The poor water quality is primarily due to excess phosphorus in the lake, which fuels algal production and decreases water clarity. Phosphorus in Lake Edina comes from several primary sources, including stormwater runoff from the watershed and flows from upstream Lake Cornelia. Curly-leaf pondweed has been observed at low levels in Lake Edina in recent years, but was not observed in spring of 2020. Water quality in Lake Edina is highly influenced by the water quality of Lake Cornelia. While this report primarily evaluates management strategies and recommendations for Lake Cornelia, associated watershed-level improvements are expected to yield some level of indirect water quality benefit to Lake Edina. 7 3 Summary of Evaluated Management Practices The goals of this project are to evaluate the feasibility and cost effectiveness of the management strategies recommended by the 2019 Use Attainability Analysis (UAA) study to help improve Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina water quality, including: • Stormwater treatment system in Rosland Park to remove additional phosphorus from stormwater flowing through Swimming Pool Pond prior to discharge into Lake Cornelia; • Other watershed management best management practices (BMPs), including stormwater retrofit BMPs in the Lake Edina watershed and opportunities for treatment of upstream ponds • Curly-leaf pondweed management in Lake Cornelia; • Installation of a winter aeration system in Lake Cornelia to minimize winter kill of predator fish and reduce recruitment of bottom-feeding fish; and • Other fishery management strategies, including potential stocking of predator fish and removal of goldfish and other bottom-feeding fish in Lake Cornelia and upstream hydraulically-connected waterbodies. One of the recommendations of the 2019 water quality study, conducting an alum treatment of Lake Cornelia to minimize release of phosphorus from lake-bottom sediments, was completed by NMCWD in the spring of 2020. The objective of this preliminary engineering study is to evaluate the feasibility of the other recommended management activities for Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina. The following sections of the report summarize the findings of the feasibility evaluation and recommendations for lake and watershed management practices: • Section 4 Stormwater Treatment in Rosland Park • Section 5 Other Watershed BMPs • Section 6 Curly-leaf Pondweed Management • Section 7 Fishery Management • Section 8 Conclusions and Recommendations 8 4 Stormwater Treatment in Rosland Park The 2019 water quality study concluded that stormwater runoff is a major contributor of phosphorus to Lake Cornelia, representing 48% to 76% of contributions to North Cornelia in modeled years. The study recommended implementation of a stormwater BMP located in Rosland Park to remove phosphorus from water flowing from the Swimming Pool Pond to North Lake Cornelia. Swimming Pool Pond (DNR wetland 679W) receives runoff from approximately 410 acres, which represents approximately 47% of the total area tributary to North Lake Cornelia (Figure 4-1). This feasibility study included two phases of analysis: (1) evaluation of conceptual BMP designs and selection of a preferred concept by the NMCWD and City of Edina, and (2) feasibility analysis and preliminary design of the selected conceptual BMP. Each of these phases are described in subsequent sections. Figure 4-1 Runoff from approximately 410-acres, shown in yellow, flows through Swimming Pool Pond 9 4.1 Conceptual Design Options Three high-level stormwater management concepts for a BMP at Rosland Park were developed and presented to NMCWD, City of Edina, and Edina Parks and Recreation Commission staff throughout a series of meetings in fall 2019. Throughout these meetings, the preliminary concepts were modified to match the visions and constraints of the various stakeholders involved. Initially, two BMP design concepts were developed for consideration by NMCWD and City of Edina staff. Concept #1 was a subsurface filtration treatment vault located under the existing parking lot between Swimming Pool Pond and North Cornelia, similar to the BMP evaluated as part of the 2019 water quality study. Concept #2 was a “stream-like” series of small, shallow surface filtration basins within the nearby green space at the park, with water from Swimming Pool Pond being pumped to the upstream end of the chain of BMPs. Preliminary presentation of this concept incorporated solar energy generation to power the pump. Based on feedback obtained from NMCWD and City of Edina staff, Concept #2 was revised to include a pump-driven filtration treatment vault located at the edge of the North Parking lot, instead of the “stream-like” series of small filtration basins. In this revised option (Concept #3), water would be pumped from Swimming Pool Pond into an above-ground treatment vault, with the pump potentially powered (or offset) by solar energy generation. After passing through the filtration system, treated water would be discharged to Lake Cornelia. Concept #3 reflects the City’s desire to minimize the BMP footprint and associated impacts on current or future park use. At a November 20, 2019, meeting with NMCWD and City of Edina Staff, Concept #3 was identified as the preferred stormwater feature concept. The above-ground filtration vault design would allow for more design flexibility and increased treatment capacity, would simplify operation and maintenance of the filtration system, would minimize parkland impacts, and would provide an opportunity to incorporate public art or education into the feature to make the system not only a functional means of reducing phosphorus to Lake Cornelia, but an attractive element of the park as well. The stormwater treatment concepts, including the preferred Concept #3, were presented to the Edina Parks and Recreation Commission on December 10, 2019, and the NMCWD board of managers on December 18, 2019. At that meeting, the NMCWD board of managers approved moving forward with Concept #3. A copy of the December 18, 2019, presentation is included as Appendix A. 4.2 Feasibility Analysis/Preliminary Design Following direction from NMCWD and the City of Edina, feasibility analysis and preliminary design for the proposed filtration vault (Concept #3) began in late-December 2019. Feasibility analysis included performing a site characterization and developing a hydraulics analysis using XPSWMM. The preliminary design phase included developing filtration media recommendations and further defining the filtration vault sizing, height, flow regime, and pumping regime. Each of these phases are discussed in detail in the subsequent sections. 10 4.2.1 Site Characterization Site characterization for the proposed filtration vault in Rosland Park included a review of geographic information systems (GIS) data to understand the existing topography, soil conditions, park features, existing storm sewer upstream and downstream of Swimming Pool Pond, and Swimming Pool Pond bathymetry. Figure 4-2 shows several existing site features, including topography, storm sewer, and bathymetry for Swimming Pool Pond. The topographic information shown in the figure is based on Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data developed in 2011. Storm sewer information (e.g., diameters, invert elevations, etc.) were obtained from the City of Edina. Bathymetry information for the water bodies surrounding Rosland Park, including Swimming Pool Pond, North Cornelia, and Point of France Pond, were also provided by the City of Edina. Bathymetric information for Lake Otto was collected by NMCWD as part of this study. Existing soil information within Rosland Park is limited; soils in this area do not have a Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) hydrologic soil group (HSG) classification designated. Given that much of the area around Lake Cornelia was part of a large wetland complex prior to develop in the 1960s and beyond, the soils throughout much of the low-lying park areas are likely hydric. Soil boring analysis is recommended for the next design phase to better understand soil stability for construction. Review of existing park infrastructure and vegetation was another important aspect of site characterization, as it was important to site the filtration treatment vault in a location that minimizes park impacts. Figure 4-2 shows the existing park features in the proposed project area, including detailed aerial imagery and locations of several existing disc golf course holes. Nearmap imagery was used for this analysis. The most recently available satellite imagery of the project area is from April 5, 2020, and has 3- inch resolution, which allowed for detailed review of the park features. !!!!!!!!!!Valleyview RdRose CtW 65th St W 64th StBrookview AveValleyview RdV a l l e y V i ew R dVa l l e y V i ew Rd W 64t h S t 62 62 880 870 870860880 870 88 0 880870 880 88088088 0 880 870 01122 3 3 4455 5 5 66 774 1 5 2 Rosland Park BMPSite CharacterizationLake Cornelia and Lake Edina Water Quality Improvement ProjectEdina, Minnesota FIGURE 4-2 Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-06-09 15:14 File: I:\Client\Nine_Mile_Creek_WD\Work_Orders\23271725_Cornelia\Rosalin Park BMP Designs\Maps\Report\Figure4-2_Roseland_Park_BMP_Site.mxd User: VAWLake Otto Swimming Pool Pond Lake Cornelia(North) Storm Manhole Storm Sewer !!Disc Golf Course Pond Bathymetry (Depth) 2 Foot Contours, 2011 10-Foot Contour 2-Foot Contour !;N 200 0 200100 Feet 12 4.2.1.1 Swimming Pool Pond Outlet Structure Discharge from Swimming Pool Pond is controlled by an outlet structure located on the west side of the pond near the parking lot for the disc golf course and playground (see Figure 4-2). The outlet structure, constructed in the mid-1960s, controls the water level at elevation 862.9 feet. Original construction drawings of the Swimming Pool Pond outlet structure indicate flow capacity is restricted within the structure by a 10-inch steel pipe with a 3-¾” orifice opening. City of Edina staff conducted a field investigation to confirm the configuration of the Swimming Pool Pond outlet in April 2020 and found that the existing metal plate with a 3-¾” orifice appears to have been removed at some point in the past as the orifice plate restricting flows into the 10” steel pipe was not visible during the site visit. Therefore, discharge from Swimming Pool Pond appears to now be controlled by a 10” steel pipe rather than a 3-¾” orifice. The storm sewer pipe between the outlet structure and North Lake Cornelia is an 18-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). 4.2.1.2 Lake Otto Outlet Lake Otto (MnDNR wetland 678W) is located just north of Trunk Highway 62, is connected to Swimming Pool Pond via two 60-inch diameter corrugated metal pipes (CMP). Although detailed information on these pipes is not available, a site visit confirmed that the pipes are both fully submerged below the normal water elevation, therefore acting as equalizer pipes between Lake Otto and Swimming Pool Pond. The two 60-inch diameter storm pipes are believed to be owned by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). 4.2.1.3 Point of France Pond Outlet Structure Point of France Pond (MnDNR wetland 680W) is located southeast of Swimming Pool Pond on the east side of Valley View Drive and north of West 69th Street. Water levels in this pond are controlled at 863.4 feet by two 60-inch wide weir structures that were installed in the mid-2000s as part of a pond dredging and improvement project conducted by the City of Edina. The weir structures tie into two existing 66-inch CMP. With the reconfiguration of the Point of France outlet structure, water levels in Point of France Pond are controlled independently of water levels in Swimming Pool Pond. 4.2.1.4 Water Quality in Swimming Pool Pond In 2018, University of Minnesota researchers partnered with the City of Edina and NMCWD to conduct a pilot study in Swimming Pool and Point of France Ponds to assess the effectiveness of applying iron filings to pond sediments to reduce the release of phosphorus from the sediments. The first step of the pilot study was to assess the extent of sediment phosphorus release occurring to determine if the waterbodies were good candidates for the proposed iron filings. In March 2019, the University of Minnesota researchers published their findings indicating that minimal internal phosphorus release was occurring in Swimming Pool Pond and Point of France Pond (Reference (3)). The 2019 University of Minnesota report, included as Appendix B, was reviewed and used to better understand existing water quality in Swimming Pool Pond. Water quality samples were taken at six locations throughout Swimming Pool Pond from May through September 2018 in the epilimnion (surface layer) and hypolimnion (bottom layer). Samples were analyzed for total phosphorus (TP), total dissolved 13 phosphorus (TDP), and soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP). TP represents all phosphorus fractions measured in the sample, whether particulate or dissolved. TDP represents the fraction of phosphorus that filters through a 0.45 micron pore size filter (organic and inorganic). SRP represents the readily bioavailable inorganic form of phosphorus (PO43-), sometimes also referred to as orthophosphate. This water quality data helped to characterize the phosphorus loading that will be treated in filtration vault. Table 4-1 provides a summary of the water quality data obtained at the six sampling sites. The sampling data generally shows that the TP concentrations in Swimming Pool Pond can range widely throughout the year. Within the epilimnion, the maximum TP concentration measured of 181 µg/L (August 22, Site 3) was 134 µg/L greater than the lowest TP concentration measured (May 16, Site 6). The observed percent fraction of TP that was either TDP or SRP also ranged quite substantially between sampling events. Table 4-1 Summary of Water Quality Data for Swimming Pool Pond from May through September 20181 Sampling Location Average TP (Range) (µg/L) Average TDP (Range) (µg/L) Average SRP (Range) (µg/L) Average %TDP (Range) Average %SRP (Range) Epilimnion 95 (47–181) 33 (6–58) 13 (1–30) 37% (9%–80%) 15% (1%–36%) Hypolimnion 100 (67–152) 32 (6–51) 15 (1–23) 33% (8%–52%) 18% (1%–28%) 1Data summarized from Appendix B of Assessment of Internal Phosphorus Loading in Swimming Pool Pond and Point of France Pond, City of Edina (Reference (3)). Figure 4-3 summarizes measured phosphorus concentrations in the epilimnion from one of the sampling sites (Site 3). The green points represent the grab sample TP measurements that were taken. The orange and purple points show the percent of the sample that was measured as TDP and SRP, respectively. This data indicates that the TP concentrations generally increased in the late summer and early fall. As the TP concentrations increased, a decrease in the percent of the sample that was TDP and SRP was observed. This indicates that a higher percentage of the sample was particulate rather than dissolved phosphorus in the late summer and early fall. The increase in particulate fraction is likely due to an increase in algal growth at the end of the growing season. Conversely, at the start of the sampling period, the TP concentrations are lower and a higher percentage of the sample is dissolved phosphorus. This wide range of concentrations and fractions of phosphorus throughout the growing season observed in Swimming Pool Pond help inform design decisions for the proposed filtration vault. 14 Figure 4-3 Swimming Pool Pond Sampling Site 3 (Epilimnion) TP Concentrations and Percent TDP and SRP over time 4.2.2 Design Considerations A number of design factors were considered during preliminary design including: • Size and aesthetics of filtration vault system • Treatment pumping rate; • Daily and annual treatment (pumping) duration; • Pumped drawdown depths of Swimming Pool Pond and Lake Otto; • Pollutant removal effectiveness (selection of treatment media); and • Operations and maintenance These design factors are discussed in detail in the following subsections. 4.2.2.1 Filtration Vault Size and Aesthetics Figure 4-4 shows the location of the proposed filtration vault system in relation to Swimming Pool Pond and the nearby parking lot. Feedback during conceptual design indicated a preference to minimize the size and impacts to open space usage in the park; the filtration vault footprint has been optimized to meet these preferences. The preliminary filtration vault design assumes the footprint of the filtration vault 15 is approximately 1,200 square feet (100 feet wide by 12 feet deep), similar to Concept #3 developed during the conceptual design phase. Figure 4-4 Location of the Proposed Filtration Vault System in Rosland Park 16 Due to the prominent size of the filtration vault and it location within the park (adjacent to the parking lot), the aesthetics of the BMP are an important consideration. Several renderings were developed to show potential design variations that would create a visually-appealing park amenity (see Figure 4-5 through Figure 4-8). Details of the aesthetics will be determined as part of final design. Suggestions of incorporating park signage, public art, and/or educational signage or features into the final design have been discussed. Figure 4-5 Rendering showing the approximate size and location of the concrete filtration vault with limestone facing on vault walls 17 Figure 4-6 Rendering showing the concrete filtration vault with partially-buried vault walls and a low limestone wall Figure 4-7 Rendering showing the concrete filtration vault with tiered wall planted with shrubs and flowering plants 18 Figure 4-8 Rendering showing the concrete filtration vault with tiered wall planted with native grasses 19 4.2.2.2 Treatment Pumping Rate Because the proposed filtration vault at Rosland Park is above ground and higher in elevation than water levels in Swimming Pool Pond, a gravity-driven system is not feasible and a pump will be necessary to convey water from the pond to the treatment vault. The pumping rate selected to treat water from Swimming Pool Pond is dependent on BMP size, cost, and filtration rate/capacity of the selected filtration media. A treatment flow rate of 1.0 cubic feet per second (cfs) was selected for preliminary design as it meets the initial criteria. A 4 to 5 horsepower (HP) pump is required to meet this flow rate. During detailed design, flowrates can be optimized to analyze the effectiveness of a variable pump, which allows flowrates to be adjusted for climatic conditions and optimized to match the media filtration rate throughout the media life. 4.2.2.3 Daily and Annual Treatment Duration The daily and annual pumping duration impacts the volume of water passed through the proposed filtration vault and also impacts the pollutant removal effectiveness and the life of the filtration media. Treating a larger volume of water must be balanced with media treatment potential. Some filtration media have limitations pertaining to the duration of inundation. For example, if spent lime is exposed to longer inundation periods, the material can lose stability and its useful life is reduced. If iron-enhanced sand or iron fillings are exposed to longer inundation periods, phosphate that was previously captured by the media can be released when oxygen levels are too low. To improve media pollutant removal effectiveness, inundation periods of no longer than 12 hours per day for the filtration vault are recommended. Two daily pumping regimes are currently being considered: (1) 12 hours pump on, 12 hours pump off and (2) 2 hours pump on, 2 hours pump off throughout the course of 24 hours. Daily pumping duration can be optimized in the field after installation. The proposed annual treatment duration is from April 15 through November 15. The annual treatment duration may need to be modified each year based on the onset of freezing temperatures. 4.2.2.4 Pumped Drawdown Depths of Swimming Pool Pond and Lake Otto Operation of the proposed pump will be dependent on water levels in Swimming Pool Pond; the pump will operate when water levels are higher than or slightly below the control elevation. There are a number of factors to consider when selecting a draw down depth, including: • Optimization of volume treated (the greater the depth pumped, the greater the treatment volume); • Permitting requirements; • Impacts to riparian land owners, including Lake Otto residential properties; and • Impacts to riparian habitat areas The depth of drawdown below the control elevation of Swimming Pool Pond (and Lake Otto) was given much consideration as part of this feasibility and preliminary design analysis, with a goal of balancing 20 maximizing the volume of water pumped to the filtration system with minimizing impacts of pumping on riparian land owners riparian of Swimming Pool Pond and Lake Otto. A hydraulic modeling analysis was conducted to help determine how much water would be treated under various pumping scenarios and what impacts the pumping scenarios would have on water levels. Pumping scenarios included evaluation of pumped drawdown depths of 3 inches and 6 inches. A pumping scenario that isolates Lake Otto from Swimming Pool Pond by constructing a weir at the Lake Otto outlet was also considered; however, considerable construction constraints and associated costs make this option undesirable. Based on results of the modeling analysis and communication with NMCWD and City of Edina staff, the recommended pump draw down depth is 3.6 inches (0.3 feet) below the control elevation of 862.9 feet. Under this scenario, the pump would turn off when water levels in Swimming Pool Pond reach 0.3 feet below the control elevation. Figure 4-9 compares the inundation extents of Lake Otto when water levels are at the control elevation and when they are 3.6 inches lower. Additional information on the hydraulic modeling analysis is included as Appendix C. As summarized in Table 4-2, the amount of water pumped to the proposed filtration vault on an average annual basis under the 3.6 inch drawdown scenario is 108 acre-feet per year. This treatment volume represents approximately 52% of the flow between Swimming Pool Pond and North Cornelia, on average. The volume of water treated by the proposed BMP will vary year-to-year, depending on climatic conditions; model results based on 35-years of precipitation data indicate the annual volume of water treated will range from 60 to 130 acre-feet. Table 4-2 Summary of Amount of Water Pumped/Treated by Proposed Filtration Vault Scenario Average Annual Pumped Volume (ac-ft)1 Range Annual Pumped Volume (ac-ft)1 % of Discharge from Swimming Pool Pond Treated Pump turns off when 3.6 inches below normal water level 108 61–143 52% 1 Treatment season is April 15 through November 15. 62 6262 62 Lake Otto InundationExtents ComparisonLake Cornelia and Lake Edina Water Quality Improvement ProjectEdina, MinnesotaFIGURE 4-9 Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-06-02 17:14 File: I:\Client\Nine_Mile_Creek_WD\Work_Orders\23271725_Cornelia\LakeOtto_Bathymetry\Maps\Report\Figure4-9_OttoInundation.mxd User: VAW!;N Lake Otto Lake Nancy Swimming PoolPond Inundation extent with water level lowered by 3.6 inches (Elevation 862.6) Inundation extent at current normal water level (Elevation 862.9) Parcel Boundary Storm Sewer 0 15075 Feet 22 Results from the 35-year hydraulic modeling analysis also were used to evaluate potential impacts on water levels in Swimming Pool Pond and Lake Otto under various pumping scenarios. Water level fluctuations in these waterbodies are typical, with water being higher than the control elevation following rain or snowmelt events and water being lower than the control elevation during dry periods due to evaporation and/or interaction with groundwater. However, some additional water level fluctuation will occur with the proposed pumping at Swimming Pool Pond. Table 4-3 compares the estimated frequency of lowered water levels under existing conditions and the recommended 3.6-inch pumping depth scenario for Swimming Pool Pond and Lake Otto. Table 4-3 Summary of Water Level Fluctuation in Swimming Pool Pond and Lake Otto under Recommended Pumping Scenario Scenario Average days/treatment period1 Swimming Pool Pond and Lake Otto greater than 3 inches below existing NWL Average days/treatment period1 Swimming Pool Pond and Lake Otto greater than six inches below existing NWL Existing conditions 25 (12%) 5 (3%) Pump turns off when 3.6 inches below normal water level 108 (50%) 13 (6%) 1 Treatment season is April 15 through November 15. 4.2.2.5 Filtration Media Selection and Pollutant Removal Effectiveness A three-chamber filtration vault is proposed to test three different filtration treatment media types, with a goal of assessing and ultimately using the media that most effectively removes phosphorus. Figure 4-10 shows a plan view of the proposed treatment vault, with each treatment media chamber approximately 35 feet long, 12 feet wide, and 3 feet deep. These dimensions are anticipated to allow for sufficient contact time of the treatment media for pollutant removal. Figure 4-10 Plan View of Three-Chamber Filtration Vault Figure 4-10 identifies three different filtration media that are recommended for use in the proposed filtration vault: CC17, a spent lime and CC17 combination (they are separate layers in the cell), and an iron and CC17 combination. Swimming Pool Pond receives stormwater from an approximately 410-acre watershed. As the runoff flows through Swimming Pool Pond, most of the large sized solids and attached phosphorus particles are removed through sedimentation; hence the solids and phosphorus particles that leave Swimming Pool Pond are small. It is important that the media used in the filtration vault be able to 23 filter these small solids and phosphorus particles. All of the recommended media have this filtration capacity. CC17 Filtration Media CC17 is a crushed limestone (CaCO3) material that has greater solubility than most limestone materials. The CC17 media acts primarily as a filter. This media can remove particulate phosphorus (the small and large particles) and a limited amount of dissolved phosphorus. This media will serve as a control to determine what phosphorus mass can be removed by simple filtration. However, the benefit of this media is that it has high hydraulic conductivity (e.g., it can filter a lot of water) and can filter a significant amount of water with a limited footprint. Spent Lime + CC17 Filtration Media Spent lime is a waste byproduct of drinking water treatment and consists of newly precipitated and consolidated calcium carbonate. Spent lime is similar to the other media in that it filters solids and particulate phosphorus, however, it also removes dissolved phosphorus (ortho-P or PO4,, also known as SRP) by raising the pH of the treated water thereby causing the precipitation of calcium phosphate (CaPO4). The main benefit of spent lime is that it has very high hydraulic conductivity and can treat large volumes of water. Spent lime is also a waste material and this provides a beneficial reuse of this material. The CC17 media would be added to the bottom of the filter bed to capture small particulate phosphorus particles. Iron-enhanced CC17 Filtration Media Because sand has a low hydraulic conductivity relative to the other filtration media considered, it is not recommended for use in the filtration vault (the footprint of a sand filter at this site would need to be approximately 10 times larger to achieve similar treatment benefits). Instead of iron-enhanced sand filtration, we are proposing to test an iron-enhanced-CC17 filtration media. This filter media should have significantly higher treatment capacity than iron-enhanced sand and be able to remove dissolved phosphorus. Iron actively binds organics, solids, and dissolved phosphorus which is often referred to as ortho-P (the resultant iron and phosphate compound is FePO4). Table 4-4 summarizes the phosphorus removal estimates for each of the evaluated filtration media. The table also summarizes filtration rates, necessary contact time, and required filtration vault sizing based on these parameters for each of the evaluated filter media. The removal efficiency values are based upon small and large scale test systems designed and evaluated by Barr on other projects. The filtration rates were either examined in the field or estimated from literature values. Prior to design and construction, it is recommended that testing of the proposed filtration media be considered, including evaluating the hydraulic conductivity of the CC17 and iron-enhanced CC17 media and conducting bench scale testing of the media for phosphorus removal effectiveness. 24 Table 4-4 Summary of Evaluated Filtration Media Filtration Media Total Phosphorus Removal Estimate (range) Approximately Filtration Rate (feet/hour) Estimated Required Contact Time (minutes) Required Vault Size at 1.0 cfs Flow (feet2)1 CC17 aggregate 45% 12 – 24 10 -20 <1,200 Spent lime 65% (8%–92%) >24 10 – 20 <1,200 Iron-enhanced sand 80% (70%–92%) 0.33 <1 10,800 Iron-enhanced CC17 aggregate 80% (70%–92%) 6 – 12 <1 <1,200 1 During the conceptual design phase, stakeholders determined that a vault size less than 1,200 ft2 was preferred 4.2.2.6 Operations and Maintenance Ease of operating and maintaining the filtration vault is paramount in ensuring long-term function of the BMP. The following filtration vault design features are proposed to assist with operations and maintenance: • A lockable surface grate that can be lifted by hand to allow for easier maintenance. The entire grate can be removed to allow full access to filter media so it can be maintained and replaced by hand or with equipment. • Valves on the filter discharge pipes to regulate flow through the filters to maximize treatment effectiveness. • Visible filter discharge pipes so that flow rates from each of the treatment cells can easily be inspected. Little or no flow from the discharge points indicate the filters are plugged and need maintenance. • Filter discharge pipes that are easy to access to allow for the easy collection of filtered water samples for testing. • A variable-drive pump so that the treatment flow rate can be adjusted for climatic conditions or media filtration rate changes over the life of the media. The anticipated maintenance requirements for the proposed filtration vault include: • Removing accumulated debris from surface of the filter approximately two times per year, which will likely include manually removing/replacing the grate, raking the surface of the filter media, and removing debris with a vac truck. • Replacing filter media every 2 or 3 years, which will likely include manually removing/replacing the grate, removing filter media with a vac truck, and disposing of the material (may require landfill disposal). • Periodic pump station maintenance. 25 • Periodic maintenance of skimmer at pump intake. 4.2.3 Water Quality Benefits The total phosphorus removal estimates for the three recommended treatment media (CC17, CC17/Spent Lime, Iron-enhanced CC17) and the modeled average annual treatment volume were used to estimate the average annual pounds of total phosphorus removed by the treatment vault. As described in Table 4-4, the estimated total phosphorus removal efficiency for CC17, CC17/Spent Lime, and Iron-enhanced CC17 are 45%, 65%, and 80%, respectively. Assuming that each media chamber is supplied with equal volumes of water from Swimming Pool Pond, the combined total phosphorus removal efficiency for the entire treatment vault is anticipated to be approximately 63%. The TP loading to the treatment vault was estimated based on three years (2015, 2016, and 2017) of phosphorus loading results from the p8 water quality model developed for the 2019 UAA water quality study (Reference (1)). Based on the modeling results, the average total phosphorus concentration discharging from Swimming Pool Pond for the months of April through November was approximately 116 µg/L. This modeled concentration is slightly higher than the average TP concentration measured in Swimming Pool Pond in 2018 by the University of Minnesota (Reference (3)). Average TP concentrations measured from May through September were 95 and 100 µg/L in the epilimnion and hypolimnion, respectively. Comparing the monitoring dates to rainfall data from the Minneapolis Airport, only two of the samples were collected on days where precipitation was recorded at the airport, in which rainfall depths were less than 0.1 inches on both days. Therefore, it appears that larger spikes in total phosphorus concentrations from major runoff events are not captured in the University of Minnesota monitoring data (measurements of internal loading were the main focus of the study). The p8 model data represents an average of dry and wet weather conditions; therefore, an average TP concentration of 116 µg/L was used as the loading estimate to the treatment vault. Table 4-5 summarizes the average annual volume of water pumped and associated total phosphorus removal estimate for the recommended pumping drawdown scenario. The average annual removal of 22 pounds of phosphorus from the filtration vault is anticipated. In the 2019 UAA for Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina, the average TP removal estimate for the Spent Lime/CC17 Vault from April through September was approximately 20 pounds, which resulted in an approximate decrease in the summer average TP concentration of North Cornelia by approximately 5 µg/L. Due to the similarity in estimated pounds of phosphorus removed for the feasibility-level designed three-chamber treatment vault, a similar reduction in TP concentration in North Cornelia can be expected with this design. 26 Table 4-5 Rosland Park Treatment Vault Total Phosphorus Removal Summary Scenario Average Annual Pumped Volume (Range) [ac-ft]1 Average Total Phosphorus Load to Vault (Range) [pounds] Total Phosphorus Removal Efficiency Estimate Average Annual Total Phosphorus Removal (Range) [pounds] Pump turns off when 3.6 inches below normal water level 108 (61–143) 34 (19–45) 63% 22 (12–28) 1 Treatment season is April 15 through November 15. 4.2.4 Permitting Based on preliminary discussions with staff from the MnDNR, the proposed pumping from Swimming Pool Pond will require a water appropriations permit. A Work in Public Waters permit could also be required, depending on the extent of proposed pumping draw down depth. Preliminary discussions with MnDNR staff indicated a Work in Public Waters permit would not be necessary if the pumping draw down depth is less than one half foot. Notification of impacted riparian landowners and an accounting of support will be required as part of the permitting process. Figure 4-11 shows the landowners riparian to Swimming Pool Pond and Lake Otto. Both of these permits have a permitting timeframe of 90–150 days and will include a 30-day public comment period. It is not anticipated that a permit will be necessary from MPCA for the proposed filtration vault. However, discussion with MPCA staff regarding the proposed BMP and proposed filtration media is recommended prior to or early in the design process to confirm. NMCWD will need to obtain the necessary rights to construct the proposed filtration vault on property owned by the City of Edina. It is anticipated that NMCWD and City of Edina will enter into a cooperative agreement upon ordering of the project. A permit for construction of the proposed filtration vault will also be required from NMCWD. 4.2.5 Opinion of Probable Cost A feasibility-level design cost estimate was developed for the Rosland Park filtration vault and is shown Table 4-6. The opinion of probable cost provided generally corresponds to standards established by the Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE). A class 3 feasibility-level opinion of cost was used based on the level of project definition (between 10% and 40%), wide-scale use of parametric models to calculate estimated costs (i.e., making extensive use of order-of-magnitude costs from similar projects), and uncertainty with an acceptable range of between -15% and +20% of the estimated project cost. A more detailed opinion of probable cost for the proposed filtration vault in Rosland Park is included in Appendix D. Swimming Pool Pond Valleyview RdRose CtW 64th StWoodale AveV a l l e y V i ew R d W 64th StBrookview AveValleyview RdW 6 4 t h S t 62 62 4801 50THST W 4801 50THST W 6240BROOKVIEWAVE 6244BROOKVIEWAVE 15411LUCERNE CIR 6320BROOKVIEWAVE 6312BROOKVIEWAVE 6228BROOKVIEWAVE 4443GARRISON LA6133OAKLAWNAVE6304BROOKVIEWAVE 6302 ROSE CT 1317 E LAKEST STE 14435GARRISON LA4425GARRISON LA425 MADISONAVE N6304 ROSE CT 1317 E LAKEST STE 14431GARRISON LA6306 ROSE CT 6305 ROSE CT6303 ROSE CT6324BROOKVIEWAVE 6228BROOKVIEWAVE Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-06-01 13:10 File: I:\Client\Nine_Mile_Creek_WD\Work_Orders\23271725_Cornelia\Drawdown\Report\Fig4_11_Riparian_Landownership_Pool_Pond_and_Lake_Otto.mxd User: VAW!;N Lake Otto Parcel Adjacent to Lake or Pond Parcel Boundary 200 0 200100 Feet Riparian Landowners to SwimmingPool Pond and Lake OttoLake Cornelia and Lake Edina Water Quality Improvement ProjectEdina, Minnesota FIGURE 4-11 28 Table 4-6 Rosland Park Treatment Vault Feasibility-Level Cost Estimates Item Description Estimated Cost Mobilization/Demobilization (10%) $40,000 Safety, Erosion Control, and Site Prep $20,000 Pump Station - Complete $110,000 Intake and Discharge Pipes, Manholes, and Appurtenances $55,000 Stormwater Filter Vault and Filter Material - Complete $200,000 Paving and Vegetation Restoration $15,000 Contingency (30%) $132,000 Construction Subtotal $572,000 Engineering and Design (30%) $172,000 Estimated Total Cost for Construction $744,000 Low Range (-15%) $632,000 High Range (+20%) $892,000 +Public Art/Education $50,000–$100,000 4.2.6 Cost-Benefit Analysis The estimated annualized cost per pound TP removed is summarized in Table 4-7. This cost assumes an estimated annual operations and maintenance cost of approximately $11,000 for annual power costs, filter media adjustments approximately every 3 years, annual vac truck usage to removed debris and sediments, pump maintenance, and periodic skimmer maintenance. Table 4-7 Rosland Park Treatment Vault Feasibility-Level Cost Estimates BMP Feasibility-Level Cost Estimate1 Feasibility-Level Cost Range (-15% - +20%) Estimated Life of Project Estimated Annualized Cost per Pound TP Removed Rosland Park Treatment Vault $744,000 $632,000–$892,000 30 years $2,200 1 Feasibility-level cost estimate does not include annual costs for operations and maintenance. Cost does include engineering and design estimate 2 Feasibility-level estimated annualized cost per pound total phosphorus removed assumes an annual maintenance cost of approximately $11,000 and an inflation rate of 3%. 29 5 Other Watershed Best Management Practices (BMPs) The 2019 UAA study for Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina confirmed that stormwater runoff is a major contributor of phosphorus to Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina. In North Cornelia, external phosphorus loading from the watershed ranged from 48% to 76% of annual phosphorus sources in modeled years (Reference (1)). For South Cornelia, the main contribution of phosphorus comes from North Cornelia; direct watershed phosphorus loading does contribute phosphorus, but to a much smaller extent than the other sources due to the relatively small size of the direct watershed (13% of the size of the direct watershed to North Cornelia). The two main sources of phosphorus loading to Lake Edina are the upstream lakes (North and South Cornelia) and the direct watershed runoff. Reducing external phosphorus loading is an important part of any lake management strategy. For lakes like Lake Cornelia that have been exposed to significant external nutrient loadings for extended periods of time, appreciable sediment and nutrients have accumulated in the lake bottom sediments. As contributions from the watershed continue, phosphorus will continue to build-up over time in the lake sediments, increasing the internal loading potential and worsening water quality conditions in the lake. The first Use Attainability Analysis for Lake Cornelia was developed by NMCWD in 2006, and revised in 2010 to reflect additional water quality monitoring data and evaluation of additional watershed Best Management Practices (BMPs). Similar to the conclusions of the 2019 UAA update, previous analyses indicated that while implementation of watershed BMPs can improve water quality in Lake Cornelia, there are no “silver bullets”. Significant improvements in lake water quality will require a combination of watershed and in-lake management practices. As part of the 2019 UAA study, several watershed best management practices (BMPs) were evaluated to assess their effectiveness in reducing phosphorus loading to Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina. Numerous potential BMPs were considered, including review of the watershed BMPs evaluated as part of the previously-completed UAA. Criteria used in the evaluation included cost effectiveness, land availability, maximizing benefit to the Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina chain of lakes, dissolved phosphorus removal, and building on effectiveness of existing stormwater treatment systems. Ultimately, the stormwater treatment BMP in Rosland Park was recommended because it meets many of the target criteria, including the greatest predicted improvements per unit cost and availability of public land. To expand on the evaluation conducted as part of the 2019 UAA, this study also included a high-level evaluation of other potential BMP opportunities to reduce watershed phosphorus loading to Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina. The sections below summarize the high-level evaluation of stormwater BMP retrofit opportunities in the Lake Edina watershed and discussion regarding opportunities for treatment in ponds upstream of Lake Cornelia. 30 5.1 Stormwater BMP Retrofit Opportunities in Lake Edina Watershed Watershed runoff comprises a significant portion of the external phosphorus loading to Lake Edina, ranging from 35% to 45% of annual phosphorus sources in modeled years (Reference (1)). A high-level watershed analysis was conducted as part of this study to identify potential opportunities to implement stormwater BMPs in the Lake Edina watershed, with a focus on partnership projects on publicly-owned lands. Two properties were identified for potential to incorporate infiltration-based BMPs: Cornelia Elementary School, owned by Edina Public Schools, and the open green space area between Lynmar Lane and Bristol Boulevard owned by the City of Edina (from this point forward referred to as Lynmar basin). These two areas were selected due to the availability of open green space adjacent to impervious surfaces (e.g., streets, parking lots, buildings, sidewalks, playground), soils conducive to infiltration capacity, a high level of visibility for educational opportunities, and low to moderate Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) vulnerability. Figure 5-1 shows the locations of potential stormwater infiltration BMPs at Cornelia Elementary School and the Lynmar Basin. Three BMPs are located at Cornelia Elementary School and one larger infiltration- BMP is located within the Lynmar Basin. The rain gardens proposed at Cornelia Elementary School would collect and infiltrate stormwater runoff primarily from the school parking lots. The stormwater infiltration feature within the Lynmar Basin would collect runoff from an 18-acre residential watershed. This basin currently receives stormwater, but serves more as a dry pond, providing flood detention but minimal water quality benefits, based on currently available information. Table 5-1 summarizes the tributary watershed information for each conceptual watershed-level BMP and also discusses preliminary BMP sizing. More detailed sizing of the stormwater BMPs would be optimized in future design phases to coordinate the desires of NMCWD and the landowners. If the NMCWD is interested in pursuing implementation of stormwater BMPs on these sites, the next step would be to contact the property owners to discuss partnership opportunities. The City of Edina has indicated potential interest in preliminary discussions. Edina Public Schools has not been contacted yet. It is recommended that the NMCWD consider preparing some sketches/renderings of the conceptual design for stormwater rain gardens prior to meeting with Edina Public Schools and City of Edina. Table 5-1 Lake Edina Watershed Infiltration-BMPs Watershed and Sizing Summary Location BMP Name Total Watershed Area (acres) Impervious Area (acres) Impervious % Approx. BMP Area (feet2) BMP Depth (inches) Concept Treatment Volume (ac-ft) Concept Treatment Depth (inches) Cornelia Elementary School CES_North 0.5 0.3 63% 1,200 18 0.03 1.1 CES_West 0.51 0.5 100% 1,900 18 0.05 1.1 CES_South 1.6 1.2 73% 3,700 18 0.10 1.1 Lynmar Basin Lynmar Basin 18.1 11.0 61% 24,400 24 1.0 1.1 1 Playground and parking lot redevelopment has occurred since Twin Cities LiDAR was collected (2011). There exists uncertainty in the total tributary area to CES_West. The total tributary area is possibly larger and needs additional investigation for BMP sizing. Glouchester Ave Heatherton Tr Bristol Blvd Lynmar La Cornelia Dr W 72nd St Bris t o l C i r Oaklawn Ave Glouchester Dr Mavelle Dr Claremore Dr Hazelton Rd Heatherton Cir Mav e l l e D r Cornelia Dr Mavelle Dr W 72nd St W 72nd St Mavelle Dr Lynmar La Heatherton Tr W 72nd St Cornelia Dr Mavelle Dr W 72nd St W 72nd St Bristol Blvd Lynmar La Mavelle Dr Mavelle Dr W 70th St W 70th St W 70th St W 70th St W 70th St Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-06-01 13:10 File: I:\Client\Nine_Mile_Creek_WD\Work_Orders\23271725_Cornelia\LkEdina Watershed\Maps\Report\Fig5_1_Potential_Stormwater_BMPs.mxd User: VAWPotential Stormwater BMPsLake Edina WatershedLake Cornelia and Lake Edina Water Quality Improvement ProjectEdina, Minnesota FIGURE 5-1 0 150 300 Feet !;N Existing Storm Manhole Existing Storm Sewer Proposed Storm Sewer Proposed Infiltration BMP Tributary Drainage Areas Parcel Boundary Cornelia ElementarySchool Lynmar Basin 32 5.1.1 Opinion of Probable Cost Concept-level opinions of probable cost were developed for the two potential BMP projects within the Lake Edina watershed (Cornelia Elementary School and Lynmar Basin). The opinions of probable cost summarized in Table 5-2 generally correspond to standards established by the AACE. Class 5 opinions of cost were used based on the limited project definition, wide-scale use of parametric models to calculate estimated costs (i.e., making extensive use of order-of-magnitude costs from similar projects), and uncertainty with an acceptable range of between -30% and +50% of the estimated project cost. 5.1.2 Cost-Benefit Analysis The water quality benefits of the concept-level infiltration basins located at Cornelia Elementary School and Lynmar Basin were estimated using the MPCA Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) calculator. The estimated annual total phosphorus removals are approximately 3.6 and 20.5 pounds from the Cornelia Elementary School basins and the Lynmar Basin, respectively. The estimated annualized cost per pound of total phosphorus removed is also summarized in Table 5-2. Table 5-2 Lake Edina Watershed Infiltration-BMP Concept-Level Cost Estimates Location Concept-Level Cost Estimate1 Concept Level Cost Range (-30% - +50%) Estimated Life of Project Estimated Annualized Cost per Pound TP Removed2 Cornelia Elementary School (3 Infiltration BMPS) $332,000 $233,000–$498,000 30 years $5,500 Lynmar Basin (1 Infiltration BMP) $512,000 $359,000–$768,000 30 years $1,500 1 Concept-level cost estimates do not include annual costs for operations and maintenance. Costs do include engineering and design estimates. 2 Concept-level estimated annualized cost per pound total phosphorus removed assumes an annual maintenance cost of approximately 10% of estimated construction costs per site and an inflation rate of 3%. 5.2 Opportunities for Treatment of Ponds Upstream of Lake Cornelia Following completion of the 2019 UAA, there were follow-up questions posed by the NMCWD board of managers regarding opportunities to reduce phosphorus to Lake Cornelia by treating upstream ponds. Internal phosphorus loading in stormwater ponds or natural waterbodies that receive stormwater discharge (from this point forward referred to as ponds) has been increasingly identified as an issue in Minnesota. There are generally two causes of internal phosphorus loading in ponds: (1) high phosphorus in pond bottom sediment resulting from years of sediment accumulation and the occurrence of low oxygen during the summer months, and (2) an abundant population of fish such as carp, bullheads, and goldfish which disturb bottom sediments and cause phosphorus to release into the water column. In many cases ponds are afflicted by both problems—they have high phosphorus in bottom sediments as well as an abundant population of bottom-foraging fish. 33 Given the root cause of internal phosphorus loading in ponds, there are generally three viable approaches to reducing internal phosphorus loading: • Remove and eliminate the bottom feeding fish such as carp; • Bind the phosphorus in the pond bottom sediment by adding aluminum (alum), iron (e.g., iron filings, per the studies conducted by the University of Minnesota), or calcium (e.g., spent lime [calcium carbonate], which is currently being studied); and • Aerate to improve oxygen concentrations. Removing fish such as carp has been shown to be successful in the Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District (Casey Lake and Markham Pond), with carp removal leading to significantly reduced phosphorus concentrations within the water column at the pond outlet. Lower turbidity and increased aquatic plant abundance occur in conjunction with carp removal. It should be noted that any activity (such as carp removal) that increases pond clarity also leads to the increased abundance of aquatic plants. This is often associated with the abundant growth of filamentous algae which for some residents is worse aesthetically than a turbid pond. The use of alum (aluminum is the main component) is a well-established method for reducing internal phosphorus loading, and this approach is being implemented at Lake Cornelia. Alum treatment of stormwater ponds has become more common in recent years, as the amount of information regarding the potential for phosphorus release from ponds has increased. The longevity of this approach is generally not known and will likely be dependent upon the watershed size tributary to the ponds and sediment loads. If an alum treatment is conducted, follow-up analysis (e.g., sediment coring) will be needed every 2 to 4 years to determine if it is still effective. If a treatment is considered, it will be necessary to do a pH- buffered treatment consisting of a mixture of alum and sodium aluminate. The use of iron is a potentially viable approach to reduce internal phosphorus loading in ponds, but this approach is considered experimental at this point. The short- and long-term benefits of treatment using iron to prevent release of phosphorus from lake- or pond-bottom sediments are still unknown. A study was conducted by the University of Minnesota Saint Anthony Falls Laboratory (SAFL) to evaluate the benefit of treating Swimming Pool Pond and Point of France Pond with iron to reduce internal P loading. The study concluded that “Present conditions in the Swimming Pool Pond and Point of France Pond suggest that the ponds are providing treatment of phosphorus. Thus, chemical treatment of sediment to reduce internal phosphorus loading is currently not recommended.” (Reference (3)). The use of spent lime is also a potentially viable approach to reduce internal phosphorus loading in ponds, but is also considered experimental at this point. Spent lime is a waste material; repurposing of that material to treat phosphorus is an attractive attribute. However, there are potential challenges in identifying an approach to apply spent lime as it is a solid material that is largely insoluble in water. As such, spent lime needs to be ground and spread in some manner. The short- and long-term benefits of treatment using spent lime to prevent release of phosphorus from lake- or pond-bottom sediments are still unknown. Barr Engineering staff and its research partners are currently conducting a study funded by 34 the Minnesota Stormwater Research Council to evaluate the effectiveness of using spent lime to reduce internal P loading in ponds. Aeration may also help by increasing oxygen in the water column and reduce the rate of phosphorus release from bottom sediments. The effectiveness of aeration in reducing phosphorus release from bottom sediments is highly variable, depending on numerous factors including equipment, water body size, depth, and configuration, and watershed characteristics. The appropriate aeration approach, such as a fountain or forced air bubbler, would need to be evaluated on a pond-by-pond basis. One potential drawback of aeration is that it may reduce settling of particulate phosphorus delivered to ponds during storm events. Periodic maintenance is typically required to keep the aerators operational and on-shore storage of equipment (aerators and pumps) is often required. Before considering further management action, it must be determined if a pond is exporting phosphorus as a consequence of internal phosphorus loading. Phosphorus monitoring at the ponds’ inlet and outlet (or within the water column) is needed to establish the magnitude of internal phosphorus loading and phosphorus export from the pond. Full-year monitoring in the spring, summer, and fall would be necessary to quantify the magnitude of phosphorus export. Once it is established that a pond or series of ponds are releasing phosphorus, appropriate mitigation approaches can be identified and applied if the magnitude of phosphorus export justifies the action. It is expected that carp and goldfish management efforts at Lake Cornelia will also benefit upstream ponds if there is a connection (e.g., active fish passage) between Lake Cornelia and these ponds. If there is a connection, it will be important to reduce or eliminate carp and goldfish populations in those ponds as well as in Lake Cornelia. Before additional upstream pond management activities are conducted, it is recommended that enough time is given to assess the benefits of carp and/or goldfish control efforts under consideration for Lake Cornelia. The carp and goldfish Passive Integrated Transponder (PIT) tagging and tracking study being undertaken by NMCWD (see Section 7), will allow the NMCWD to better understand the connectedness of Lake Cornelia and upstream ponds as it pertains to fish movement. 35 6 Curly-leaf Pondweed Management The presence of curly-leaf pondweed and its mid-summer die-off negatively impacts the water quality of Lake Cornelia. Monitoring results presented in the 2019 water quality study indicate that curly-leaf pondweed contributes to up to 17% of the annual phosphorus loading to North Cornelia and up to 23% of the annual phosphorus loading to South Cornelia. Accordingly, management of curly-leaf pondweed is an important component of a long-term management plan for Lake Cornelia. Curly-leaf pondweed has been observed in Lake Edina in recent years at low levels. The 2019 water quality study concluded that internal phosphorus loading from curly-leaf pondweed die-off/decay is minimal in Lake Edina. Effective control of aquatic invasive species can require long-term management. A long-term curly-leaf pondweed management goal of reducing presence of the invasive plant until neither curly-leaf pondweed nor turions are observed in the lake would be most protective of Lake Cornelia and downstream lake ecosystems. However, this long-term management goal would require intensive treatment that may not be sustainable for the duration needed to be successful. As such, a more immediate goal of Lake Cornelia curly-leaf pondweed management is to reduce the extent and density of the invasive plant throughout the lake such that it doesn’t significantly hinder growth of the native plant community and mid-summer die off of curly-leaf pondweed does not cause reduced water quality. This feasibility study evaluates two alternatives for curly-leaf pondweed management: annual herbicide treatment (current approach) and a lake drawdown. 6.1 Annual Herbicide Treatments The City of Edina has been conducting annual herbicide treatments in Lake Cornelia since 2017 to reduce the impact of curly-leaf pondweed die-back on water quality in Lake Cornelia and downstream Lake Edina and to help promote a healthy native aquatic plant population. Results of the spring 2020 pre-treatment plant survey indicate that annual treatments are having some level of effectiveness in reducing the population of curly-leaf pondweed in Lake Cornelia (Reference (4)). Since 2017, pre-treatment monitoring indicates a decrease in curly-leaf pondweed presence at sampling sites (Figure 6-1). Density of sampled curly-leaf pondweed has decreased as well. While annual herbicide treatments can reduce the extent and density of curly-leaf pondweed, this approach may necessitate long-term annual herbicide treatments to be effective. The City of Edina anticipated conducting an herbicide treatment of Lake Edina in 2020 to manage curly- leaf pondweed. However, a pre-treatment survey in spring of 2020 found little or no curly-leaf pondweed in the lake. 36 Figure 6-1 Curly-leaf Pondweed Presence at Sampled Sites from 2017 to 2020 6.1.1 Permitting Herbicide treatment would require an Invasive Aquatic Plant Management Permit from the MnDNR. The permit requires completion of a pre-treatment vegetation survey and may require follow-up monitoring depending on the terms of the permit. 6.1.2 Opinion of Probable Cost The planning-level opinion of probable cost for herbicide treatment of the curly-leaf pondweed in Lake Cornelia is approximately $28,000 per year of treatment, with a range of $26,000 to $34,000 (-10% to +20%). This estimate includes preparation of contract documents, permitting, and herbicide application. The cost estimate also includes potential costs related to monitoring that may be deemed appropriate or required by the MnDNR as part of permitting, including temperature measurements, herbicide residue monitoring, and aquatic plant monitoring. Note that the cost estimate included in the UAA study for herbicide treatment of Lake Cornelia was lower than the cost described in this report because it did not include costs incurred by city staff related to contracting and permitting, or monitoring costs. A detailed opinion of probable cost for the curly-leaf pondweed herbicide treatment is included in Appendix D. 6.2 Lake Drawdown Another potential method to control curly-leaf pondweed is to draw down Lake Cornelia to allow the lake bed to freeze over the winter. Curly-leaf pondweed primarily propagates through production of dormant vegetative propagules called turions. Turions are produced in late spring, remain dormant in sediment 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 2017 2018 2019 2020Number of SitesCurly-leaf Pondweed Presence at Sampled Sites from 2017 to 2020 37 through the summer, and germinate under cooler water conditions in the fall. A winter freeze can kill the turions, thus disrupting curly-leaf pondweed’s reproductive cycle. A high-level evaluation of conducting a drawdown to control curly-leaf pondweed in Lake Cornelia was included as part of this feasibility study due to the success of this approach in other lakes, including several in the NMCWD, and the desire to avoid recurring management activities. The sections below discuss drawdown background and methods, and a high-level feasibility assessment of a draw down in Lake Cornelia, including permitting, opinion of probable cost, and other considerations. 6.2.1 Background on Drawdown as Management Method Several other waterbodies in the region have used drawdown as a means to achieve water quality objectives. A successful shallow lake restoration was conducted in Big Muskego Lake in southeast Wisconsin using a combination of several in-lake treatments, including an 18-month drawdown period. This drawdown resulted in the consolidation of sediments in addition to allowing for the removal of rough fish populations and reestablishment of native aquatic plant species. Sediment consolidation was desired for the reduction of future sediment resuspension, although the extent of consolidation was limited by rain and flood events during the drawdown period. The NMCWD completed a drawdown on Southwest and Northwest Anderson Lakes in Eden Prairie in fall 2008. The drawdown was conducted using electrical pumps to dewater a significant portion of each lake in an effort to significantly reduce and potentially eliminate curly-leaf pondweed from the two lakes. The goal of the project was to expose as much of the lake sediment as possible to freezing conditions during the 2008-2009 winter season and chemically treat any remaining open water areas. Freezing the lake sediment was expected to effectively kill the young curly-leaf pondweed plants and the curly-leaf pondweed turions. Monitoring conducted in 2015 found several floating fragments of curly-leaf pondweed in Southwest Anderson Lake, but rooted curly-leaf pondweed plants were not. In Northwest Anderson Lake, curly-leaf pondweed was present but rare in the east end of the lake and was not found in the west portion of the lake. Overall, the drawdown effort has remained successful in controlling curly-leaf pondweed. Three Rivers Park District performed a successful lake level drawdown on Cleary Lake in Scott County, Minnesota to control curly-leaf pondweed (personal communications with John Barton). The initial Cleary Lake drawdown was not a complete drawdown because of a restriction in the outlet channel which limited the volume of water that would flow out of the lake by gravity. As a result, the initial drawdown was only effective at controlling curly-leaf pondweed over the portions of the lakebed exposed to freezing conditions. Therefore, the Park District did a complete drawdown the following year by modifying the outlet channel and installing temporary pumps to completely dewater the lake. The Park District has indicated the drawdown was extremely effective at controlling curly-leaf pondweed. The NMCWD also conducted a drawdown of Normandale Lake in Bloomington in fall 2018. The initial drawdown was conducted using diesel pumps to dewater a significant portion of the lake in order to install a new bypass pipe which would drain the lake by gravity. The pipe was installed in November 2018 and was successful in keeping the majority of the lake drawn down over the 2018–2019 winter season. 38 Freezing the lake bottom sediments killed many of the curly-leaf pondweed turions; sediment samples taken in the fall of 2019 found that the number of turions had decreased dramatically. Aquatic plant surveys conducted in June 2019 and May 2020 indicate reduced frequency and density of curly-leaf pondweed throughout Normandale Lake. 6.2.2 Drawdown Method Outlet modification, siphoning and temporary pumping are drawdown methods that have been used in similar projects. Modifying the outlet to draw down the lake by gravity is not feasible since a large portion of the lake is below the elevation of the outlet weir and downstream storm sewer. Siphoning could be used to draw the lake down below the outlet elevations but difficulties in maintaining and re-priming the siphon once the lake is drawn down and then receives inflow in response to precipitation events, especially during winter months, make this option impractical. Installing temporary pumping is the only feasible option for dewatering Lake Cornelia. Temporary pumps have the potential to quickly draw the lake down in the late summer and can be easily turned on and off as needed to keep the lake drawn down over the fall and winter months. Based on similar projects, it is assumed that diesel pumps with mufflers would be used to reduce noise in this residential area. Figure 6-2 shows the approximate lake bathymetry of Lake Cornelia. As shown, there are several deeper holes throughout both the North and South basins. Three temporary pumping stations would be needed to draw down most of North Cornelia and the two deep holes in South Cornelia as shown in Figure 6-2. Pump 1 would be located on the southeast side of North Cornelia in the park area and would pump water from North Cornelia to the north hole in South Cornelia through the 15-inch diameter storm sewer under West 66th Street. Pump 2 would be located on city of Edina property on the south side of South Cornelia and would pump water from South Cornelia’s north hole to its south hole. Pump 3 would be located on private property or stormwater easement, if available, on the southeast side of South Cornelia near the lake outlet and would pump water from South Cornelia’s south hole over the existing outlet weir and into the downstream storm sewer. For this level of study, it is assumed that the pumping capacity at all three locations would be the same. A lake level drawdown goal of approximately 851 feet was used for this high-level drawdown feasibility analysis. Figure 6-2 also shows the extent of open water within the lake at a drawdown elevation of 851 feet. For this analysis, it was assumed that the deeper hole on the far north side of the North basin and other smaller low areas would not be pumped, so would remain as open water to an elevation of approximately 854 feet. The pumps would need to run continuously from mid-August to mid-September to draw down lake levels to the target elevation of 851 feet. After the lake is drawn down, the pumps would need to be run periodically to drain inflows due to precipitation events or potential groundwater inflows. For this study it is assumed that the pumps would need to run approximately 50 percent of the time from mid-September through February; this could vary widely depending on precipitation and climate conditions. #* #* #* South Cornelia North Cornelia W 66th St W 64th St W e s t S h o r e D r Va l l e y V i ew Rd Cornelia Dr Southdale Rd Southcrest Dr Parnell Ave Upper Ter Creston Rd Point Dr Laguna Dr Wooddale Ave W 68th St Hillcrest La W 65th St Bulfanz Rd Roycar Rd Oaklawn Ave Valleyview Rd W 64th St Valley View Rd V a l l e y V i ew R d W 65th St Valleyview Rd Judson La Dawson La Miller La Rose Ct St Johns Ave Peacedale Ave Ashcroft La Wilfor d W a y Broo k v i e w A v e W 64th St W 64th St Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-06-01 14:17 File: I:\Client\Nine_Mile_Creek_WD\Work_Orders\23271725_Cornelia\Drawdown\Report\Fig6_2_Drawdown_Overview.mxd User: VAWLake Drawdown OverviewLake Cornelia and Lake Edina WaterQuality Improvement ProjectEdina, Minnesota FIGURE 6-2 0 300 600 Feet !;N *Note:1 Proposed drawdown elevation isapproximately 851 feet. For pumped areas, openwater extent will be at Elevation 851. For unpumped low areas, open water extent will be at approximately Elevation 854.2 Elevations calculated from measured bathymetry depths assuming lake was near controlelevation of 859.1 feet. #*Potential Pump Locations Potential Pump Pipelines Existing Storm Manhole Existing Storm Sewer Approximate Extent ofOpen Water During Drawdown1 Approximate Lake Bathymetry2 858-859 Feet 857-858 Feet 855-856 Feet 854-855 Feet 853-854 Feet 852-853 Feet 851-852 Feet <851 FeetPump 1 draws water from North Corneliaand discharges into storm sewer under West 66th Street. Pump 2 draws water from South Cornelia'snorth hole and discharges into the south hole. Pump 3 draws water from South Cornelia'ssouth hole and discharges over the existingoutlet weir and into the downstream storm sewer. 40 6.2.3 Lake Drawdown Analysis A predictive spreadsheet water balance model was created to evaluate several drawdown options in terms of how quickly Lake Cornelia could be drawn down in the fall, how likely the lake will remain drawn down over winter, and how quickly lake levels can rebound in the spring. Daily inflows to the lake were estimated based on P8 model results. Daily outflows from the lake were calculated using a rating curve that accounts for the existing outlet structure. Sixty-nine years of precipitation data (1949–2018) were input into the model to predict the water surface elevations in the lake over a wide range of actual climatic conditions. The model was also set up to predict the lake responses to the various drawdown options by allowing the user to vary the size of pumps as well as the dates that the pumps are turned on. 6.2.3.1 Drawdown Timing The amount of time for Lake Cornelia to draw down to its target elevation of 851 feet is dependent on the starting elevation of the lake, pumping capacity, and amount precipitation received during the draw down period. Table 6-1 summarizes the time to draw down the lake with three different pump capacities (given in gallons per minute or gpm) assuming the lake starting elevation is at its control elevation of 859.1 feet and there are no watershed inflows during the drawdown period. While the assumption of no watershed inflows during the drawdown period is unlikely, the information summarized in the table provides a general comparison of timing with the various pumping capacity scenarios. Table 6-1 Time to Draw Down Lake to Elevation 851 Assuming no Inflows 2,000 gpm Pumps 3,000 gpm Pumps 4,000 gpm Pumps Days to Drawdown to Elevation 8511 27 18 14 1 Assumes lake starting elevation is at control elevation of 859.1 feet and no inflows during the drawdown period For the Normandale Lake drawdown project, MnDNR indicated a preference for the lake to be drawn down by September 15 to minimize impacts to the area’s turtle community as it prepares for winter hibernation. The predictive spreadsheet water balance model was used to evaluate the three pumping capacities, assessing the likelihood of meeting the DNR’s September 15 drawdown guideline if the drawdown begins on August 15. Starting the drawdown earlier than August 15 had minimal impact on meeting the September 15 drawdown guideline or the overall effectiveness of a fall drawdown since summer precipitation events tend to fill the lake back up. Figure 6-3 shows the likelihood (% of years modeled) of drawing the lake down to an elevation of 851 feet on a given date for each of the pump capacities, based on the predictive water balance model. The modeling shows that the 2,000 gpm pumps will succeed in drawing down the lake to the elevation of 851 feet by September 15 in less than 10 percent of the modeled years. On the other hand, increasing the pump capacity to at least 3,000 gpm improves the likelihood of drawing the lake down by September 15 to 77 percent. Increasing the pump capacity from 3,000 gpm to 4,000 gpm has less impact on the likelihood of drawing down the lake by September 15 (77% versus 90%). Under all three pump capacities, lake levels occasionally bounce back up during the fall and winter in response to rainfall events. However, 41 increasing the pump capacity to at least 3,000 gpm decreases the amount of time it takes for the lake to draw back down. Figure 6-3 Drawdown Effectiveness of Various Pump Capacities, based on August 15 Start Date 6.2.3.2 Maintaining Winter Drawdown Conditions A lake drawdown would allow much of the lake bed to freeze over the winter. Maintaining the drawdown over the winter months is important to maximize the extent to which and amount of time the sediments are frozen. Rainfall or snowmelt events do occasionally happen during the winter months and the resulting increased inflows from the Lake Cornelia watershed can cause the lake level to quickly bounce up. The predictive water balance model was used to evaluate the likelihood of maintaining low lake levels during the months of December through February for each of the evaluated drawdown options, based on a 69-year time period representing a wide range of climate conditions. Figure 6-4 shows the percentage of years that the drawdown target elevation of 851 feet was exceeded at least once during a given month due to a rainfall or snowmelt event. Model results indicate that, while all three pump sizes will perform fairly well at keeping the lake levels below the target elevation of 851, increasing the pump size to at least 3,000 gpm will keep the likelihood of exceeding the target elevation in any given month to less than 26 percent. Increasing the pumping capacity from 3,000 gpm to 4,000 gpm has less impact on the likelihood of exceeding the target elevation. 42 Figure 6-4 Effectiveness of Maintaining Drawdown Conditions during Winter Months 6.2.4 Permitting Conducting a lake drawdown would require approval from the MnDNR through a Work in Public Waters Permit. Under Minnesota Statute Section 103G.408, 75 percent of the riparian landowners must authorize a drawdown. The City of Edina owns all of the property adjacent to North Lake Cornelia and approximately half of the shoreline property around South Lake Cornelia. South Lake Cornelia has 31 private, riparian landowners; 24 landowners (75%) would need to authorize the drawdown for it to proceed Figure 6-5 identifies the riparian property owners around Lake Cornelia. The pumping stations needed to pump water from North Lake Cornelia and from the west half of South Lake Cornelia can be located on City of Edina property. NMCWD would need to obtain the necessary rights to use property owned by the City of Edina in a cooperative agreement between the two entities for the project. NMCWD would also need to obtain the necessary rights to use private property near the South Lake Cornelia outlet. A pump would need to be located on private property near this outlet to pump the water out of the east half of South Lake Cornelia and over the outlet weir. Permits/approvals for the drawdown may also be required from the City of Edina, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the MPCA and NMCWD, depending on dewatering method. #* #* #* South Cornelia North Cornelia 4200 6328 6333 2463322463016302 24 4300 4018 4010 6566 4015 6336 4508 4504 45006337633663296324 633263246325 4717 6409 6401 244701242424 24 6417 6433 6432640864166424 64326500651624 246529 65336500 6508 6516 65246525 6517 6509 650164006425 6404 6408 6412 6416 6526472865086532 4720 24242424 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 2424242424242424242424244429 6709 6713 6717452145174513450945056708 67124504450845124516452045124520244501 67046624662866326636 6700 6704 670866056609661366176621 662545294525452445286709 24 6629 6 6 3 3 452466006602 66046608 6604 66086612661666206705 6701 6641 6637 6633662966256621661766136609 66056601 470566006601 48134809480567006612 6616662066246628 6632 6636480448084812663366296625471247166709 4808480448004728 4713471747214725472948014805480948134804672048084812 6801 6809 442444204421442568254501450568 0 1 6805 6809 6813 6817 6821 6820 6816 6812 6808 6804 6712 6716 4704470868166805 6801 6721 6717 6713 470147054709 2466006709 6713 67174201 24 6801 6805 6809 6604660866126616 6620 6624 6700 6704 6708 6712 6716 6705 6701 6629 662566216617 660566096613 6617 6621 6701 6705 6709 6713 6717 6801 6805 6809 6813 6800 6804 6808 6900 6609 66046608661266166620 6624 6700 6704 6708 6712 6800 6804 6808 6812 6613680968056729 6713 6700 670867126716 67206724 6728 24 4317 43134311430524 24430166006704 6813 6901 6905 6900 6904 6908 6916 6920 6924 6912 6916 6920 692469286921 6917 6913 6909 6825 682168176813680568086816 6820 68246825 6817 6809 6800 6808 6816 6817 6821 6825682969016905690169006904 690869216917 6913 69096905 690169046908 Wilfo r d Way Broo k v i e w A v eAshcroftLaRoseCtSt JohnsAvePeacedaleAveMillerLa DawsonLaJudson La W 68th St Roycar Rd Point DrValleyview RdBulfanz Rd W 65th St Wooddale AveHillcrest LaOa k l a w n A v e Creston RdParnell AveUpper Ter Laguna Dr Southdale RdCornelia DrValley View RdW e s t S h o r e D r S o u t h c r e s t D r W 66th St W 64th St Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-06-09 15:08 File: I:\Client\Nine_Mile_Creek_WD\Work_Orders\23271725_Cornelia\Drawdown\Report\Fig6_5_Lake_Drawdown_Riparian_Property_Owners.mxd User: VAWLake Drawdown Riparian Property OwnersLake Cornelia and Lake Edina WaterQuality Improvement ProjectEdina, Minnesota FIGURE 6-5 0 300 600 Feet !;N #*Potential Pump Locations City of Edina Parcel Parcel Boundary Lake Cornelia (Project Area) Riparian Property Owner Park Boundary 44 6.2.5 Opinion of Probable Cost A planning-level opinion of probable cost has been developed for the 3,000 gpm pump capacity option (Table 6-2). Costs were not developed for the 2,000 gpm pump scenario because the pump capacity is too low based on the model results discussed in the preceding sections. Likewise, costs were not developed for the 4,000 gpm pump scenario since there is very little benefit to using the larger pump capacity. The planning-level opinion of probable cost for conducting a winter drawdown in Lake Cornelia using 3,000 gpm pumps is approximately $1,829,000, with a range of $1,281,000 to $2,744,000 (-30 percent to +50 percent). The opinion of probable cost is based on engineering judgement, experience with similar projects, and review of actual bid values from recent, similar projects. A detailed opinion of probable cost for a drawdown of Lake Cornelia is included in Appendix D. The opinion of cost was developed assuming the pumps would need to run continuously from mid- August to mid-September and then run approximately 50 percent of the time from mid-September through February. The opinion of costs include an expected accuracy range (-30 percent to 50 percent), based on the current extent of project definition, wide-scale use of parametric models to calculate estimated costs (i.e., making extensive use of order-of-magnitude costs from similar projects or proposals), and project uncertainty. 6.2.6 Other Drawdown Considerations Temporary pumping would likely require construction of temporary enclosures to store the pumps, minimizing the potential for vandalism or accidents. Pumping during winter months introduces the potential for complications related to flash freezing, frazil ice, etc. The pumps would need to be checked daily in times of extreme cold to ensure they are functioning properly. The pumps would operate on diesel fuel and would need to be refueled daily when running. The pumps will also need noise baffling for noise reduction due to their proximity to residential areas. 45 Table 6-2 Summary of Estimated Costs for Lake Drawdown, Assuming 3,000 gpm Pump Capacity Items Estimated Cost Mobilization/Demobilization $5,000 Pump set-up, rental, and removal (3,000 gpm pump) $507,300 Daily servicing (including refueling and maintenance) during initial 30-day drawdown period1 $137,400 Periodic servicing (including refueling and maintenance) to maintain drawdown1 $388,800 Site restoration $7,500 HDPEP inlet and outlet pipes for all three pipes (2,400 Feet Total) $36,000 Construction subtotal: $1,082,000 Construction contingency (30%) $325,000 Estimated construction cost $1,407,000 Planning, engineering, and design (30%) $422,000 Total $1,829,000 Low range (-30%) $1,281,000 High range (+50%) $2,744,000 1 Cost estimate assumes one month of continuous pumping (August 15 through September 15) followed by 6.5 months of intermittent pumping (September 15 through March 1) to keep the lake drawn down. The cost estimate assumes pumping 50% of the time during the intermittent period but this could vary widely depending on precipitation and climate conditions. 46 7 Fishery Management 7.1 Overview of Lake Cornelia Fishery The NMCWD commissioned a fisheries assessment in 2018 to gain a more complete understanding of the fishery of Lake Cornelia and connected water bodies, including quantifying the common carp (Cyprinus carpio) population. The fish survey included Lake Cornelia (North and South), and upstream waterbodies Lake Nancy, Swimming Pool Pond, and Point of France Pond; the 2018 survey did not include Lake Otto. Figure 7-1 shows North and South Cornelia and the upstream waterbodies and the storm sewer that connect the various waterbodies. Overall, the fish sampled in the Lake Cornelia system were small in size and species richness was limited, likely a result of the 2017–2018 winterkill and past winterkills that have occurred (Reference (5)). Common carp populations were relatively low in Lake Cornelia. Conversely, goldfish (Carassius auratus) were found in large numbers in Lake Cornelia. Goldfish were the most abundant fish species captured through electrofishing and were determined to have an established breeding population. While most of the goldfish captured were young of the year (YOY) or one year old, fully-grown fish up to 14.4 inches in length were also captured. While carp were found in lesser numbers in Lake Cornelia, they were more abundant in Point of France Pond and are being included in consideration of management options. Similar to carp, goldfish have the potential to negatively impact water quality by increasing in-lake turbidity due to benthic feeding habits (Reference (6), Reference (7)). The bottom-feeding fish can also increase in-lake nutrient levels and contribute to blue-green algae blooms from nutrient cycling through the fish gut (Reference (8), Reference (9)). Goldfish have also been documented to reduce growth of aquatic plants (Reference (6)). With the high numbers of goldfish in the Lake Cornelia system and their potential to reduce water quality, management options to reduce the goldfish population are being considered by NMCWD and its partners. The sections below provide additional information regarding goldfish and potential management approaches to help reduce the goldfish and carp populations and maintain a healthy fishery in Lake Cornelia. 7.2 Goldfish Literature Review While a relatively large amount of research has been conducted on common carp and their impact on water quality in Minnesota, limited research is available regarding goldfish and goldfish/carp hybrids. A literature review was conducted as part of this feasibility study to better understand the characteristics of goldfish and goldfish/carp hybrids and their role and movements within lake systems. Results of the literature search are summarized below. NWL = 863.0 NWL =862.9 NWL =859.1 NWL = 862.9INV = 860.7 NWL =863.4 NWL =859.1 18"15"15"12"12" 12"15" 60" North LakeCornelia South LakeCornelia LakeNancy PamelaPond LakeOtto SwimmingPool Pond Point ofFrancePond42"66"48"48"42"42"18" 456717 456717 6262 Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Lake CorneliaStorm Sewer SystemLake Cornelia and Lake EdinaWater Quality Improvement ProjectEdina, Minnesota FIGURE 7-1 Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-06-02 12:11 File: I:\Client\Nine_Mile_Creek_WD\Work_Orders\23271725_Cornelia\Drawdown\Report\Fig7_1_Cornelia_StormSewer.mxd User: VAWMajor Watersheds #Storm Sewer Outlet Storm Sewer 0 600 Feet !;N 48 7.2.1 Influence of Goldfish Goldfish have a high tolerance to hypoxic conditions and can also survive prolonged periods of low temperatures (Reference (10), Reference (11), Reference (12), Reference (13), Reference (14)). Goldfish are omnivorous and can use a variety of food or prey items, including vegetation, during various life stages and/or seasonal periods (Reference (12), Reference (15), Reference (16)). As identified in the 2019 UAA study (Reference (1)), Lake Cornelia is a highly disturbed system with frequent winterkill, which creates conditions suitable for success of goldfish populations (Reference (12), Reference (17)) and reduced success of native fishes (Reference (18)). Rapid growth of young goldfish allow them to quickly grow past the size available to typical predators (Reference (19)). Frequent winterkill in Lake Cornelia contributes to a lack of native fish, including predator fish such as northern pike that could select for small goldfish as a soft-rayed food source (Reference (20)). 7.2.2 Hybridization Goldfish hybridization with common carp has been documented and is likely occurring in Lake Cornelia as potential spawning areas may overlap (Reference (21), Reference (22), Reference (23), Reference (24), Reference (12)). 7.2.3 Goldfish Control Methods Several potential methods for controlling the goldfish population in Lake Cornelia are discussed below. Integration of management methods has been shown to be successful and is the recommended approach for Lake Cornelia (Reference (25), Reference (26), Reference (27), Reference (28), Reference (29)). Integrated efforts to control nuisance populations of fish can consider a combination of a number of techniques, including removal, drawdown, stocking, reduced access to spawning areas, habitat improvement, and winterkill mitigation. 7.2.3.1 Removal Physical removal of goldfish has been successful in some circumstances (Reference (8)) using a combination of monofilament gill nets and electrofishing. Goldfish also may be susceptible to capture in appropriately mesh size baited nets due their highly developed olfactory and tactile systems used for foraging similar to common carp (Reference (30), Reference (31), Reference (32), Reference (29), Reference (15), Reference (33), Reference (34)). Maxwell (Reference (5)) documented successful capture of goldfish using both electrofishing and trap (fyke) nets. 7.2.3.2 Biologic (Predation) No successful documentation of biologic control of goldfish or goldfish/carp hybrids was found as part of the literature review. Indirect evidence of the impact of native fish populations on goldfish is via Laird and Page (Reference (35)), where in Illinois goldfish were noted as unable to compete with native fish and could only survive in severely disturbed areas. Stocking a certain species of fish such as bluegill, northern pike, or largemouth bass to control another species of fish is documented as one of the least successful type of fish control programs when used as 49 the only element of a control effort (Reference (36)). Bajer et al (Reference (37)) documented that bluegill predation on common carp eggs can achieve control of the species; however similar documentation of the effect of bluegill predation on goldfish eggs was not found at part of the literature review. Conditions and requirements for successful bluegill populations is well documented and can be compared to conditions in Lake Cornelia (Reference (38), Reference (39), Reference (40), Reference (41)). However, conditions in Lake Cornelia are not currently well suited to establishment of a successful bluegill population. 7.2.3.3 Drawdown Lake level drawdown can have an impact on success of goldfish spawning success. Yamamoto et al (Reference (14)) noted that as little as a 12-inch drawdown following spring goldfish spawning reduced spawning success of goldfish and other cyprinds. 7.2.3.4 Reduced Access to Spawning Areas Common carp actively seek winterkill waters as preferred spawning areas; no documentation was found to suggest that goldfish target similar spawning areas (Reference (42)). However, goldfish do spawn on vegetation during May-June, and warming water temperatures trigger spawning (Reference (23), Reference (24)). Large areas of Lake Cornelia with high densities of vegetation may contribute to success of goldfish larva (Reference (14)). Fish barriers can be an effective method to reduce access to spawning areas. 7.2.3.5 Chemical control Chemical toxicants for removal of undesirable fish populations is documented as one of the more successful fish control techniques (Reference (36), Reference (43)). Use of chemical toxicants, however, can generate conflicting views by lake users, residents, or the community at large making the use of chemical control mechanisms dependent on public acceptance. The use of chemical toxicants as part of an integrated pest management program for control of nuisance fish species that includes habitat manipulation, stocking etc. has been shown to be successful (Reference (27)). 7.2.3.6 Winterkill Mitigation Review of the 2018 fishery data indicate that the Lake Cornelia fishery tends to be heavily influenced by frequent winterkill events, evidenced by a low number of bluegill and other predator fish. The frequency of winterkills and the availability of connected shallow waterbodies that winterkill which likely act as nurseries, are most likely preventing bluegills and other sunfish from effectively controlling goldfish within the system. Management activities such as winter aeration can help to prevent winterkill and promote survival of predator fish. 7.3 Recommended Goldfish and Carp Management Approach Based on the literature review of goldfish in lake systems and currently-available information regarding the fishery in Lake Cornelia, an integrated approach to goldfish and carp management using a 50 combination of management actions is anticipated to be the most successful option. The following management approach is recommended: 1) Conduct removal of goldfish and carp in combination with mitigation of recurrent winterkill through the use of winter aeration As identified in the literature review, there are several potential methods for goldfish removal, including biological control, lake drawdown, physical removal and chemical control. A combination of physical removal and biological control (predation) is the preferred approach at this time (versus lake drawdown and/or chemical treatment), as removal efforts can be selective/targeted to goldfish to reduce impacts to other fish and wildlife. However, additional information is needed to assess the potential effectiveness of removal efforts, including monitoring of the goldfish and carp populations in the Lake Cornelia system to understand their movements (assess feasibility of targeted removals) and assess the efficacy of baited box nets for removal of goldfish (see Section 7.4). 2) Stock native fish following removal of large numbers of goldfish and winterkill mitigation. Stocking of native fish such as bluegill, largemouth bass and/or pike is likely to reduce success of goldfish following initial removal of a large biomass of the existing goldfish population and mitigation of winterkill to allow for native fish populations to survive for more than just a few seasons. Stocking of native fish will be affected by availability of disease free fish stocks in the region (Reference (44)). 7.4 Winter Aeration to Prevent Fish Kill A comprehensive evaluation was conducted by Barr’s subconsultant, Gantzer Water, to evaluate the feasibility of installing a winter aeration system that could be used in either North or South Cornelia, or both basins, to prevent periodic winter fish kill, promote the establishment of a self-sustaining native fish population, and reduce the carp and goldfish population in Lake Cornelia. The detailed report, developed by Gantzer Water, is provided in Appendix E. Four different types of aeration systems were considered and evaluated according to the following criteria: • Effectiveness • Minimal potential aesthetic effects (on the lake and on shore) • The system should not affect the normal winter ice thickness • Ease of maintenance 7.4.1 Aeration Methods Considered This section describes the types of aeration systems considered. 7.4.1.1 Full Lift Aeration A full lift aeration system injects air into a tube at the bottom of the lake to draw water to the lake surface where the water is aerated. This system is often described as a “tube within a tube” system where open 51 water is present at the top of the tube. A raft is also necessary to hold equipment and anchor the tube in place. See Figures 7 and 13 in the Gantzer report (Appendix E). 7.4.1.2 Full Lift Oxygenation A full lift oxygenation system uses 95% pure oxygen that is injected at the bottom of the lake inside a tube. The tube draws water to the lake surface where it then cascades down the sides of the outer tube. This system is largely the same as the full lift aeration system except the oxygen injected into the water provides the aeration rather than contact of lake water with the atmosphere. See Figure 13 in the Gantzer report (Appendix E). 7.4.1.3 Oxygen Enhanced Full Lift Aeration An oxygen-enhanced full lift aeration system uses air that is injected at the bottom of the lake inside a tube that draws water to the lake surface. This is also a “tube within a tube” system; however, as water cascades down the sides of the outer tube, 95% pure oxygen is injected to add additional oxygen to the lake water. There is open water at the top of the tube, and a raft would be necessary to hold equipment and anchor the tube in place. See Figures 9 and 13 in the Gantzer report (Appendix E). 7.4.1.4 Side Stream Saturation A side stream saturation aeration system is very different from the others evaluated in that water is withdrawn from the lake, aerated with 95% pure oxygen, and discharged back into the lake. With this design there is no raft and there typically would not be any open water or thin ice. This design was considered because it is efficient, would have minimal aesthetic disturbance, and shouldn’t affect usage of the lake by residents (i.e., winter ice thickness is not anticipated to be impacted). 7.4.2 Recommended Aeration Method The side stream saturation system was identified as the preferred approach as it will be most capable of meeting the criteria identified for this project, which include efficiency, minimal aesthetic disturbance (the piping and other aeration equipment should not be visible to lake users), and this system is not anticipated to affect usage of the lake by residents (i.e., winter ice thickness should not be measurably impacted). Figure 7-2 shows the essential components of the side stream saturation system. To aerate both North and South Cornelia, two separate aeration systems will be required. Installation of an aeration system in South Cornelia only is recommended at this time for several reasons: • Installation of the system in South Cornelia allows the system to be tested and refined prior to installation of a system in North Cornelia. There is no impediment to installing an aeration system in North Cornelia several years after installation in South Cornelia. • There is potential for North Cornelia to freeze to the bottom due to its shallow nature, thereby rendering the aeration system less effective; and • If North Lake Cornelia freezes to the bottom and kills all the native fish, it is possible that the North Cornelia fish population may be repopulated by the fish in South Cornelia. The possibility 52 of fish passage between South and North Cornelia will be better understood after completion of the carp and goldfish tracking study (see Section 7.6). Figure 7-2 Main Components of the Side-stream Aeration System for Lake Cornelia Figure 7-3 shows the potential configuration of a side stream aeration system in South Cornelia. The system includes an intake located in one bay of South Cornelia and an outlet in the other bay. The intake is located to minimize short circuiting and to pull water in a circular pattern in the west part of South Cornelia. Between the inlet and outlet, a pump and the oxygen injection system components would be housed in an approximately 8-foot by 8-foot building. The outlet consists of PVC pipe with slots designed to slowly feed water into the bottom of the lake at very low velocities. The intake and outlet pipes will be positioned approximately 4 inches above the lake bottom. This system will operate from January until about mid-March and will be able to deliver 17 kilograms/day of oxygen. Additional design details are provided in Appendix E. 7.4.3 Permitting A MnDNR Aeration Permit would be required for installation of the aeration system. The permitting process is straightforward and requires minimal information such as the purpose of aeration (prevention of winter fish kill is one option), the permittee, period of operation, and a description of the system. Potential site forequipment storage Potential site forequipment storage South Cornelia North Cornelia W 66th St W 64th St W e s t S h o r e D r Va l l e y V i ew Rd Cornelia Dr Southdale Rd Southcrest Dr Parnell Ave Upper Ter Creston Rd Point Dr Laguna Dr Wooddale Ave W 68th St Hillcrest La W 65th St Bulfanz Rd Roycar Rd Oaklawn Ave Valleyview Rd W 64th St Valley View Rd V a l l e y V i ew R d W 65th St Valleyview Rd Judson La Dawson La Miller La Rose Ct St Johns Ave Peacedale Ave Ashcroft La Wilfor d W a y Broo k v i e w A v e W 64th St W 64th St Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-06-01 11:34 File: I:\Client\Nine_Mile_Creek_WD\Work_Orders\23271725_Cornelia\Drawdown\Report\Fig7_3_Potential_Configuration_of_Aeration_System_V2.mxd User: VAWPotential Configuration of Aeration SystemLake Cornelia and Lake Edina Water Quality Improvement ProjectEdina, Minnesota FIGURE 7-3 0 300 600 Feet !;N *Note:Elevations calculated from measured bathymetry depths assuming lake was near outlet control elevation of 859.1 feet. Intake and Distribution Pipes Slotted Well Piping Solid PVC Feed Pipe Approximate Location of Private Ice Rink Approximate Water Depth* 0 - 1 Feet 1 - 2 Feet 2 - 3 Feet 3 - 4 Feet 4 - 5 Feet 5 - 6 Feet 6 - 7 Feet 7 - 8 Feet 54 7.4.4 Opinion of Probable Cost A planning-level opinion of probable cost has been developed for designing and installing a side stream aeration system in South Cornelia. Costs were not developed for an aeration system in North Cornelia at this time due to the recommended staged approach. However, it is anticipated that design and installation of a side stream aeration system in North Cornelia would be similar to that of South Cornelia. The planning-level opinion of probable cost for designing and installing a side stream aeration system in South Cornelia is $202,000, with a range of $172,000 to $243,000 (-15 percent to +20 percent) (Table 7-1). The opinion of probable cost is based on engineering judgement, and experience with similar projects. The opinion of cost includes costs for specialty design services and technical support from Gantzer Water during project installation and system start-up including follow-up site visits, as needed. A detailed opinion of probable cost is included in Appendix D. Table 7-1 Summary of Estimated Costs for Winter Aeration Items Estimated Cost Mobilization/Demobilization $9,700 Safety, erosion control, and site prep $15,900 Aeration system $76,400 Site restoration $4,300 Construction subtotal: $106,300 Construction contingency (30%) $31,900 Estimated construction cost $138,200 Gantzer Water design and commissioning support1 $22,000 Planning, engineering, and design (30%) $41,500 Total $201,700 Low range (-15%) $171,500 High range (+20%) $242,000 1 Gantzer Water design and commissioning support includes engineering and design support, startup testing, operations and maintenance manual and training, and 2 years of startup support. 7.5 Stocking Stocking of native fish such as bluegill, largemouth bass and/or pike is recommended to reduce success of goldfish following initial removal of a large biomass of the existing goldfish population and mitigation of winterkill (aeration) to allow for native fish populations to survive for more than just a few seasons. North and South Cornelia have been sporadically stocked by the MnDNR West Metro Area Fisheries and via the MnDNR Fishing in the Neighborhood (FIN) programs since 1961 (Reference (45)). Stockings in the 55 last 10 years have been comprised primarily of bluegill with some black crappie, along with hybrid and pumpkinseed sunfish. All fish stocked in the last 10 years are shown as adults (2+ year of age) on Lakefinder. The last noted stocking was in 2016 with 300 adult bluegills stocked. Lake Cornelia is managed as a highly disturbed winterkill lake under the FIN program. Ongoing stocking is influenced by availability of fish due to the area-wide presence of viral hemorrhagic septicemia (VHS) an infectious viral disease. VHS has precluded MnDNR from accessing fish for trap and transfer of adults from previously used sources (Reference (46)). Stocking rates of adult bluegill by MnDNR have been variable based on the availability of fish; however, during several of the years from 2010 through 2016, adult bluegills were stocked at the rate of approximately 6 adults/surface acre (total stocking of approximately 300 fish). This rate is below rates recorded by Dauwalter and Jackson (Reference (47)) where the rate of stocking 3- to 5-inch bluegills in adjacent states such as South Dakota was approximately 100/surface acre (in combination with largemouth bass in a planned stocking management option). Spring stocking of sexually mature fish requires fewer fish; as few as 2 pair of sexually mature fish per ½ acre of surface water can provide an adequate initial stocking (Reference (48)). Using this guideline for stocking of sexually mature fish, Lake Cornelia would require approximately 420 sexually mature adults equally split between male and female for an initial stocking. Under some conditions as few as 10 pair of gravid brood stock bluegills per one hundred surface acres are suggested to be capable of establishing a population (Reference (49)). Due to regularly occurring winterkill and/or frequent winter occurrences of very low oxygen levels in Lake Cornelia, carry-over of any bluegills stocked the previous year is highly variable. This factor combined with likely removal of some stocked bluegill via sport fishing results in low numbers of bluegills likely present each spring. Sampling in 2018 with fyke nets showed low numbers of bluegill in South Cornelia (1/net) with higher numbers in North Cornelia (10/net). The Minnesota statewide normal range for bluegill catch per unit effort in trap nets is 3.7- 42.9/net. Future successful stocking of bluegill or other potential fishes to prey on various life stages of goldfish will be influenced by the availability of fish (Reference (44)) from VHS disease-free sources and prior mitigation of regularly recurring winterkill. Future stocking schedules, species and rates should be determined in conjunction with MnDNR fisheries West Metro management and could include approaches such as: a) Stocking 3–5” size disease free bluegills at a rate of 100/surface acre. This should be conducted in combination with largemouth bass in a planned management option. b) Alternatively, initially stock up to 420 sexually mature bluegill adults from disease free sources equally split between male and female c) Stock at rates similar to the past history of MnDNR management from disease free sources that include bluegill, largemouth bass and northern pike 56 7.5.1 Permitting Since Lake Cornelia is a public water, all future potential stocking must be coordinated with MnDNR. 7.5.2 Costs The approximate cost range for private hatchery, certified disease-free adult bluegills is $1–$3/fish plus transportation. Other species such as northern pike or largemouth bass have a higher cost/fish. 7.6 Additional Monitoring A combination of physical removal and biological control (predation) is the recommended approach to manage goldfish at this time, as removal efforts can be selective/targeted to goldfish to reduce impacts to other fish and wildlife. As mentioned in Section 7.3, additional information is needed to assess the potential effectiveness of removal efforts, including monitoring of the goldfish population in the Lake Cornelia system to understand their movements (assess feasibility of targeted removals) and assessment of the efficacy of baited box nets for removal of goldfish. Barr staff worked with staff from NMCWD and WSB to develop a monitoring program to gather additional information on goldfish and carp in the Lake Cornelia system. The monitoring program will help confirm goldfish and carp populations and will include analysis of age structure of a goldfish sample to better understand the environmental conditions that drive goldfish movements to connected water bodies. The monitoring program will also track movement of goldfish and carp, which is important in better understanding their mobility, spawning patterns and likelihood to travel/spread within a system. Finally, a possible goldfish removal method (baited box net trapping) will be tested to determine effectiveness with goldfish (this method has shown to be successful with carp. The goldfish and carp monitoring program will begin in summer 2020. A copy of the scope of work is included as Appendix F. 57 8 Lake Management Conclusions and Recommendations In 2019, the NMCWD completed a water quality study for Lake Cornelia and downstream Lake Edina; the study recommended further consideration of several watershed and in-lake management activities to improve water quality in both lakes. This report summarizes a feasibility analysis and/or evaluation of options for several potential management activities, including the following: • Feasibility analysis and preliminary design of a stormwater treatment filtration system in Rosland Park; • Review of other potential watershed BMPs, including conceptual design of retrofit stormwater BMPs in the Lake Edina watershed and consideration of treatment opportunities in ponds upstream of Lake Cornelia; • Evaluation of curly-leaf pondweed management options, including herbicide treatment and lake drawdown; and • Evaluation of fishery management options to control goldfish and carp populations, including winter aeration to prevent winterkill of predator species, fish removal, and fish stocking 8.1 Stormwater Treatment in Rosland Park The 2019 water quality study concluded that stormwater runoff is a major contributor of phosphorus to Lake Cornelia and recommended implementation of a stormwater best management practice (BMP) located in Rosland Park to remove phosphorus from water flowing from the Swimming Pool Pond to North Lake Cornelia. As part of this feasibility study, Barr staff worked closely with NMCWD and City of Edina staff from the Engineering, Public Works, and Parks and Recreation departments to identify a conceptual BMP design and location within Rosland Park. The proposed stormwater BMP is an above- ground filtration vault that will treat a significant portion of the water that flows from Swimming Pool Pond to Lake Cornelia. The above-ground filtration vault design allows for more design flexibility, increased treatment capacity, simplified operation and maintenance, and fewer concerns about functionality as compared with an underground system. The proposed location minimizes parkland impacts and provides an opportunity to incorporate plantings, park signage, public art or education into the feature design to make the system not only a functional means of reducing phosphorus to Lake Cornelia, but an attractive element of the park as well. Under the proposed pumping scenario, the pump will operate approximately 12 hours per day mid-April through mid-November when water levels are higher than or within 3.6 inches of the existing control elevation. Based on this scenario, approximately 52% of the flow between Swimming Pool Pond and North Cornelia between mid-April and mid-November will be treated, on average. A three-chamber filtration vault is proposed to test three different filtration media types, with a goal of assessing and ultimately using the filtration media that most effectively removes phosphorus. The estimated total 58 phosphorus removal efficiency for the proposed filtration vault is approximately 63%, based on the anticipated removal efficiencies of the proposed filtration media. Based on this and the estimated volume of water filtered, the filtration vault is anticipated to remove 22 pounds of phosphorus on an average annual basis, with a range of 12 – 28 pounds for evaluated years, dependent on climatic conditions. A feasibility-level design cost estimate was developed for the Rosland Park filtration vault and is shown in Table 8-1. The opinion of probable cost provided generally corresponds to standards established by the Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE). A class 3 feasibility-level opinion of cost was used based on the level of project definition (between 10% and 40%), wide-scale use of parametric models to calculate estimated costs (i.e., making extensive use of order-of-magnitude costs from similar projects), and uncertainty with an acceptable range of between -15% and +20% of the estimated project cost. The estimated annualized cost per pound of total phosphorus removed is also summarized in Table 4-7. Table 8-1 Rosland Park Treatment Vault Feasibility-Level Cost Estimate BMP Feasibility-Level Cost Estimate1 Feasibility-Level Cost Range (-15% - +20%) Estimated Life of Project Estimated Annualized Cost per Pound TP Removed2 Rosland Park Treatment Vault $744,000 $632,000–$892,000 30 years $2,200 1 Feasibility-level cost estimate does not include annual costs for operations and maintenance. Cost does include engineering and design estimate 2 Feasibility-level estimated annualized cost per pound total phosphorus removed assumes an annual maintenance cost of approximately $11,000 and an inflation rate of 3%. Based on preliminary discussions with staff from the MnDNR, the proposed pumping from Swimming Pool Pond will require a water appropriations permit. A Work in Public Waters permit will likely not be necessary since the proposed pumping draw down depth is less than one half foot. Notification of impacted riparian landowners and an accounting of support will be required as part of the permitting process. While it is not anticipated that a permit will be necessary from MPCA for the proposed filtration vault, discussions with MPCA staff regarding the proposed BMP and proposed filtration media is recommended prior to or early in the design process to confirm. NMCWD will need to obtain the necessary rights to construct the proposed filtration vault on property owned by the City of Edina. It is anticipated that NMCWD and the City of Edina will enter into a cooperative agreement upon ordering of the project. A permit for construction of the proposed filtration vault will also be required from NMCWD. Prior to design and construction, it is recommended that testing of the proposed filtration media be considered, including evaluating the hydraulic conductivity of the CC17 and iron-enhanced CC17 media and conducting bench scale testing of the media for phosphorus removal effectiveness. 59 8.2 Other Watershed BMP Opportunities As part of the 2019 UAA study, several watershed best management practices (BMPs) were evaluated to assess their effectiveness in reducing phosphorus loading to Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina, including watershed-wide infiltration, a BMP in Rosland Park, and street sweeping. This feasibility study expanded on previous analyses to include a high-level evaluation of other potential BMP opportunities in the Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina watersheds, including consideration of retrofit stormwater BMPs on publicly- owned land in the Lake Edina watershed and treatment opportunities in ponds upstream of Lake Cornelia (Point of France Pond, Lake Otto, Lake Nancy). 8.2.1 Stormwater BMP Retrofit Opportunities in Lake Edina Watershed Watershed runoff comprises a significant portion of the external phosphorus loading to Lake Edina, ranging from 35% to 45% of annual phosphorus sources in modeled years (Reference (1)). A high-level watershed analysis was conducted as part of this study to identify potential opportunities to implement stormwater BMPs in the Lake Edina watershed, with a focus on partnership projects on publicly-owned lands. Two properties were identified for the potential to incorporate infiltration-based BMPs: Cornelia Elementary School, owned by Edina Public Schools, and the open green space area between Lynmar Lane and Bristol Boulevard owned by the City of Edina (from this point forward referred to as Lynmar basin). Three rain gardens proposed at Cornelia Elementary School would collect and infiltrate stormwater runoff from approximately 2.6 acres of primarily school parking lot. A stormwater infiltration feature within the Lynmar Basin would collect and infiltration runoff from an 18-acre residential watershed. Concept-level opinions of probable cost were developed for the two potential BMP projects and are shown in Table 8-2. The opinions of probable cost are generally correspond to standards established by the AACE. Class 5 opinions of cost were used based on the limited project definition, wide-scale use of parametric models to calculate estimated costs (i.e., making extensive use of order-of-magnitude costs from similar projects), and uncertainty with an acceptable range of between -30% and +50% of the estimated project cost. The estimated annual total phosphorus removals are approximately 3.6 and 20.5 pounds from the Cornelia Elementary School basins and the Lynmar Basin, respectively. The estimated annualized cost per pound of total phosphorus removed is also summarized in Table 8-2. 60 Table 8-2 Lake Edina Watershed Infiltration-BMP Concept-Level Cost Estimates Location Concept-Level Cost Estimate1 Concept Level Cost Range (-30% – +50%) Estimated Life of Project Estimated Annualized Cost per Pound TP Removed2 Cornelia Elementary School (3 Infiltration BMPS) $332,000 $233,000–$498,000 30 years $5,500 Lynmar Basin (1 Infiltration BMP) $512,000 $359,000–$768,000 30 years $1,500 1 Concept-level cost estimates do not include annual costs for operations and maintenance. Costs do include engineering and design estimates. 2 Concept-level estimated annualized cost per pound total phosphorus removed assumes an annual maintenance cost of approximately 10% of estimated construction costs and an inflation rate of 3%. If the NMCWD is interested in pursuing implementation of stormwater BMPs on these sites, the next step would be to contact the property owners to discuss partnership opportunities. The City of Edina has indicated potential interest in preliminary discussions. Edina Public Schools has not been contacted yet. It is recommended that the NMCWD consider preparing some sketches/renderings of the proposed rain gardens and infiltration basin prior to meeting with Edina Public Schools and City of Edina. 8.2.2 Opportunities for Treatment of Ponds Upstream of Lake Cornelia Internal P loading in stormwater ponds has been increasingly identified as an issue in the Twin Cities area. There are generally two causes of internal P loading in ponds: (1) high phosphorus in pond bottom sediment resulting from years of sediment accumulation and the occurrence of low oxygen during the summer months, and (2) an abundant population of fish such as carp, bullheads, and other fish such as goldfish which disturb bottom sediments and cause phosphorus to release into the water column. In many cases ponds are afflicted by both problems, they have high phosphorus in bottom sediments as well as an abundant population of bottom foraging fish such as carp and goldfish. Given the root cause of internal loading in ponds, there are three viable approaches to reducing internal phosphorus loading in ponds: (1) remove and eliminate the bottom feed fish such as goldfish and carp, (2) bind the phosphorus in the pond bottom sediment by adding aluminum (alum), iron (e.g., iron filings per the studies conducted by the University of Minnesota, or calcium (e.g., spent lime (calcium carbonate) is currently being studied), and (3) aerate to improve oxygen concentrations. Removing fish such as carp has been shown to be successful in the in the Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District with carp removal leading to reduced phosphorus concentrations within the pond water column at the pond outlet. Lower turbidity, but also increased aquatic plant abundance, occurs in conjunction with carp removal. The use of alum (aluminum is the main component) is a well-established method for reducing internal phosphorus loading and this approach is being used for Lake Cornelia. The use of iron and spent lime are also potentially viable approaches but are more experimental. Spent lime is a waste material and repurposing of that material to treat phosphorus is attractive. However, there are potential challenges in identifying an approach to apply spent lime as spent lime is a solid material that is largely insoluble in 61 water and would have to be ground and spread in some manner. Iron has potentially similar application challenges. The short- and long-term benefits of treatment using spent lime and iron in a waterbody are still unknown. Aeration may also help by increasing oxygen in the water column and reduce the rate of phosphorus release from bottom sediments. The appropriate aeration approach such as a fountain or forced air bubbler would need to be evaluated on a pond-by-pond basis. The first step before committing to a management action is to determine if a pond is exporting phosphorus as a consequence of internal P loading by monitoring at the ponds’ inlet and outlet (or within the water column). Once it is established that a pond or series of ponds are releasing phosphorus, then appropriate mitigation approaches can be identified and applied if the magnitude of phosphorus export justifies the action. A 2018 monitoring analysis conducted by the University of Minnesota concluded that minimal internal phosphorus release was occurring in Swimming Pool Pond and Point of France Pond upstream of Lake Cornelia. Water quality data has not been collected from Lake Nancy or Lake Otto, but should be considered in the future to better understand whether internal loading from sediment phosphorus release is occurring. It is expected that carp and goldfish management efforts at Lake Cornelia will also benefit upstream ponds if there is a connection (e.g., active fish passage) between Lake Cornelia and these ponds. If there is a connection then it will be necessary to reduce or eliminate carp and goldfish populations in those ponds as well as in Lake Cornelia. The 2018 fishery survey noted an abundant goldfish population in Lake Nancy, which is connected to North Cornelia via a storm sewer under Highway 62. Before other management activities are considered in Lake Nancy, it is recommended that we wait to realize the benefits of carp and goldfish control at Lake Cornelia. No fisheries information is currently available for Lake Otto. 8.3 Curly-leaf Pondweed Management The presence of curly-leaf pondweed and its mid-summer die-off negatively impacts the water quality of Lake Cornelia. Accordingly, management of curly-leaf pondweed is an important component of a long- term management plan for Lake Cornelia. Effective control of aquatic invasive species can require long- term management. While a long-term curly-leaf pondweed management goal of reducing presence of the invasive plant until neither curly-leaf pondweed nor turions are observed in the lake would be most protective of Lake Cornelia and downstream lake ecosystems, it would require intensive treatment that may not be sustainable for the duration needed to be successful. As such, a more immediate curly-leaf management goal is to reduce the extent and density of the invasive plant throughout Lake Cornelia so it doesn’t significantly hinder growth of native plants and so mid-summer die off of curly-leaf pondweed does not cause reduced water quality. Two alternatives for curly-leaf pondweed management were evaluated as part of this study: annual herbicide treatment (current approach) and a lake drawdown. 62 8.3.1 Annual Herbicide Treatments The City of Edina has been conducting annual herbicide treatments in Lake Cornelia since 2017 to reduce the impact of curly-leaf pondweed die-back on water quality in Lake Cornelia and downstream Lake Edina and to help promote a healthy native aquatic plant population. Spring pre-treatment plant surveys since 2017 indicate annual treatments are having some level of effectiveness in reducing the presence and density of curly-leaf pondweed throughout the lake. While annual herbicide treatments can reduce the extent and density of curly-leaf pondweed, this approach may necessitate long-term annual herbicide treatments. The planning-level opinion of probable cost for herbicide treatment of the curly-leaf pondweed in Lake Cornelia is approximately $28,000 per year of treatment, with a range of $26,000 to $34,000 (-10% to +20%). This estimate includes preparation of contract documents, permitting, and herbicide application. The cost estimate also includes potential costs related to monitoring that may be deemed appropriate or required by the MnDNR as part of permitting, including temperature measurements, herbicide residue monitoring, and aquatic plant monitoring. The City of Edina anticipated conducting an herbicide treatment of Lake Edina in 2020 to manage curly- leaf pondweed. However, a pre-treatment survey in spring of 2020 found little or no curly-leaf pondweed in the lake. 8.3.2 Lake Drawdown Another potential method to control curly-leaf pondweed is to draw down water levels in a lake to allow the lake bed to freeze over the winter. Curly-leaf pondweed primarily propagates through production of dormant vegetative propagules called turions. Turions are produced in late spring, remain dormant in sediment through the summer, and germinate under cooler water conditions in the fall. A winter freeze can kill the turions, thus disrupting curly-leaf pondweed’s reproductive cycle. A high-level evaluation of a drawdown in Lake Cornelia to control curly-leaf pondweed was included as part of this feasibility study due to the success of this approach in other lakes, including several in the NMCWD, and the desire to avoid recurring management activities. Results of the analysis indicate that while it would be feasible to draw the lake down, the project is cost prohibitive. The drawdown would require a pumping capacity of 3,000 gallons per minute (gpm) to have a reasonable likelihood of drawing down lake levels within the timeframe required by MnDNR and keeping lake levels drawn down throughout the winter months. In addition, three separate 3,000 gpm pumps would be necessary to pump water from the several deeper holes throughout North and South Cornelia. Conducting a lake drawdown would require approval from the MnDNR through a Work in Public Waters Permit. Under Minnesota Statute Section 103G.408, 75 percent of the riparian landowners must authorize a drawdown. The City of Edina owns all of the property adjacent to North Lake Cornelia and approximately half of the shoreline property around South Lake Cornelia. South Lake Cornelia has 31 private, riparian landowners. 63 8.3.3 Curly-Leaf Management Recommendation Given that the annual herbicide treatments are having some level of effectiveness in reducing the presence and density of curly-leaf pondweed throughout Lake Cornelia, it is recommended that this management approach be continued. Additional monitoring to compare year-to-year effectiveness in reducing the presence and density of curly-leaf pondweed is recommended. Because of the high cost, intensive permitting requirements, and uncertainty regarding the likelihood of maintaining a drawn down condition throughout the winter months, a lake draw down is not recommended at this time. 8.4 Fishery Management A 2018 fish survey identified a large population of goldfish in Lake Cornelia and upstream Lake Nancy. Similar to carp, goldfish have the potential to negatively impact water quality by increasing in-lake turbidity due to benthic feeding habits and increase in-lake nutrient levels from nutrient cycling through the fish gut. With the high numbers of goldfish in the Lake Cornelia system and their potential to reduce water quality, management options to reduce the goldfish population were considered as part of this feasibility study. While carp were found in lesser numbers in Lake Cornelia, they were more abundant in Point of France Pond and are being included in consideration of management options. While a relatively large amount of research has been conducted on common carp and their impact on water quality in Minnesota, limited research is available regarding goldfish and goldfish/carp hybrids. A literature review was conducted as part of this feasibility study to better understand the characteristics of goldfish and goldfish/carp hybrids, their role and movements within lake systems, and potential goldfish control methods. 8.4.1 Fish Management Recommendations Based on the literature review of goldfish in lake systems and currently-available information regarding the fishery in Lake Cornelia, an integrated approach to goldfish and carp management using a combination of management actions is anticipated to be the most successful option. The following management approach is recommended: 1) Conduct removal of goldfish and carp in combination with mitigation of recurrent winterkill through the use of winter aeration As identified in the literature review, there are several potential methods for goldfish and carp removal, including biological control, lake drawdown, physical removal and chemical control. A combination of physical removal and biological control (predation) is the preferred approach at this time (versus lake drawdown and/or chemical treatment), as removal efforts can be selective/targeted to goldfish to reduce impacts to other fish and wildlife. However, additional information is needed to assess the potential effectiveness of removal efforts, including monitoring of the goldfish and carp populations in the Lake Cornelia system to understand their movements (assess feasibility of targeted removals) and assess the efficacy of baited box nets for removal of goldfish. 64 2) Stock native fish following removal of large numbers of goldfish and winterkill mitigation. Stocking of native fish such as bluegill, largemouth bass and/or pike is likely to reduce success of goldfish following initial removal of a large biomass of the existing goldfish and carp populations and mitigation of winterkill to allow for native fish populations to survive for more than just a few seasons. Stocking of native fish may be affected by availability of disease free fish stocks in the region. 8.4.2 Winter Aeration A comprehensive evaluation was conducted by Barr’s subconsultant, Gantzer Water, to evaluate the feasibility of installing a winter aeration system that could be used in either North or South Cornelia, or both basins, to prevent periodic winter fish kill, promote the establishment of a self-sustaining native fish population, and reduce the carp and goldfish population in Lake Cornelia. Several different types of aeration systems were considered and evaluated according to effectiveness, aesthetic effects, potential impacts on winter ice thickness (safety consideration), and ease of maintenance. A side stream saturation system was identified as the preferred approach as it will be most capable of meeting the criteria identified for this project, which include efficiency, minimal aesthetic disturbance (the piping and other aeration equipment should not be visible to lake users), and this system is not anticipated to affect usage of the lake by residents (i.e., winter ice thickness should not be measurably impacted). Two separate systems would be required to aerate both North and South Cornelia. It is recommended that an aeration system be installed only in South Cornelia at this time. Installation of the system in South Cornelia will allow the system to be tested and refined prior to potential future installation of a system in North Cornelia. It is expected that the aeration system in South Cornelia may be more effective than North Cornelia, as there is greater potential for North Cornelia to freeze to the bottom due to its shallow nature. The side stream saturation aeration system in South Cornelia will include an intake located in one bay of and an outlet in the other bay, pulling water in a circular pattern in the west part of South Cornelia. A pump and the oxygen injection system components would be housed in an approximately 8-foot by 8- foot equipment storage building on the City-owned property on the south side of South Cornelia. The proposed system would operate from January until about mid-March. The planning-level opinion of probable cost for designing and installing a side stream aeration system in South Cornelia is $202,000, with a range of $172,000 to $243,000 (-15% to +20%). The opinion of probable cost is based on engineering judgement, and experience with similar projects. The opinion of cost includes costs for specialty design services and technical support from Gantzer Water during project installation and system start-up including follow-up site visits, as needed. 8.4.3 Goldfish and Carp Removal A combination of physical removal and biological control (predation) is the preferred approach to remove goldfish and carp from the Lake Cornelia system. While information is limited regarding effective goldfish removal techniques, there is hope that the baited box net approach that has been successful with carp will 65 also be effective in catching and removing goldfish. NMCWD intends to test the baited box net approach in 2020 and 2021 as part of their goldfish monitoring project. 8.4.4 Stocking Stocking of native fish such as bluegill, largemouth bass and/or pike is recommended to reduce success of goldfish following initial removal of a large biomass of the existing goldfish population and mitigation of winterkill (aeration) to allow for native fish populations to survive for more than just a few seasons. Future stocking schedules, species and rates should be determined in conjunction with MnDNR fisheries West Metro management and could include approaches such as: a) Stocking 3-5” size disease free bluegills at a rate of 100/surface acre. This should be conducted in combination with largemouth bass in a planned management option. b) Alternatively, initially stocking up to 420 sexually mature bluegill adults from disease-free sources equally split between male and female. c) Stocking at rates similar to the past history of MNDNR management from disease-free sources that include bluegill, largemouth bass and northern pike. 8.4.5 Additional Monitoring As compared with carp, limited research is available regarding goldfish and goldfish/carp hybrids. As such, it is important to gather additional information on goldfish in the Lake Cornelia system. The proposed monitoring program, beginning in summer of 2020, will help confirm goldfish and carp populations and will include analysis of age structure of a goldfish sample to better understand the environmental conditions that drive goldfish movements to connected water bodies. The monitoring program will also track movement of goldfish and carp, which is important in better understanding their mobility, spawning patterns and likelihood to travel/spread within a system. Finally, a possible goldfish removal method (baited box net trapping) will be tested to determine effectiveness with goldfish (this method has shown to be successful with carp). 66 9 References 1. Barr Engineering Co. Report Summary Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina Water Quality Study Use Attainability Analysis for Lake Cornelia (updated from 2010) and Lake Edina (first version). July 2019. 2. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Water Management Plan. October 2017 (Amended April 2018, April 2019). 3. Natarajan, Poornima and Gulliver, John. Assessment of Internal Phosphorus Loading in Swimming Pool Pond and Point of France Pond, City of Edina. s.l. : College of Science & Engineering, University of Minnesota, 2019. 4. Berg, Matt. Personal email communication to Jessica Vanderwerff Wilson at City of Edina. s.l. : Endangered Resources Services LLC, April 20, 2020. 5. Maxwell, Joshua. Lake Cornelia System Fisheries Assessment. s.l. : Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District, 2018. 6. Turbidity Generation and Biological Impacts of an Exotic Fish Carassius auratus, Introduced into Shallow Seasonally Anoxic Ponds. Richardson, M, Whoriskey, F and Roy, L. 4, 1995, Journal of Fish Biology, Vol. 47. 7. Effects of Adult Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio) on Multiple Trophic Levels in Shallow Mesocosms. Parkos, Joseph, Santucci, Victor and Wahl, David. 2, 2003, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Vol. 60, pp. 182-192. 8. Morgan, David, Beatty, Stephen and McLetchie, Heather. Control of Feral Goldfish (Carassius auratus) in the Vasse River: Report to the Vasse-Wonnerup LCDC. s.l. : Centre for Fish and Fisheries Research, Murdoch University, 2005. 9. Growth and Potential Photosynthesis of Cyanobacteria are Stimulated by Viable Gut Passage in Crucian Carp. Kolmakov, Vladimir and Gladyshev, Michail. s.l. : Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003, Aquatic Ecology, Vol. 37, pp. 237-242. 10. Hypoxia. Richards, Jeffrey. 2009, Fish Physiology, Vol. 27. 11. Simultaneous Direct and Indirect Calorimetry or Normoxic and Anoxic Goldfish. Van Waversveld, J, Addink, A and Van Den Thillart, G. 1989, Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol. 142, pp. 325-335. 12. Safer, Martin. Aquatic Invaders of the Pacific Northwest: Carassius Auratus auratus (Common Goldfish). 2014. 67 13. Penttinen, O and Holopainen, I. Seasonal Feeding Activity and Ontogenetic Dietary Shifts in Crucian Carp. [book auth.] W Wieser, et al. Environmental Biology of European Cyprinids: Developments in Environmental Biology of Fishes. s.l. : Springer, Dordrecht, 1992, Vol. 13. 14. Effects of Summer Drawdown on Cyprinid Fish Larvae in Lake Biwa, Japan. Yamamoto, Toshiya, Kohmatsu, Yukihiro and Yuma, Masahide. s.l. : The Japanese Society of Limnology, June 2006, Vol. 7, pp. 75-82. 15. Chemical Foraging Stimulation in the Omnivorous Species Crucian Carp, Carassius carassius (Linnaeus 1758). Olsen, K, et al. 2018, Aquaculture Reports, Vol. 12, pp. 36-42. 16. Feeding Habits of Carassius carassius (Cyprinidae) in Beni Haroun Dam (Northeast of Algeria). Khelifi, Naima, et al. 6, s.l. : AACL Bioflux, 2017, Vol. 10, pp. 1596-1609. 17. Nonnative Fishes Inhabiting the Streams and Lakes of Illinois. Laird, Christopher and Page, Lawrence. 1, 1996, Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin, Vol. 35, pp. 1-51. 18. Minimal Dissolved Oxygen Requirements of Aquatic Life with Emphasis on Canadian Species: A Review. Davis, John. 12, s.l. : Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 1975, Vol. 32, pp. 2295-2332. 19. Aspects of Growth and Feeding in Golden Carp, Carassius auratus, from South Australia. Mitchell, B. 6, 1979, Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, Vol. 103, pp. 137-144. 20. Direct and Indirect Effects of Predation on a Fish Community: A Whole-Lake Experiment. He, Xi and Kitchell, James. s.l. : American Fisheries Society, 1990, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, Vol. 119, pp. 825-835. 21. Interspecific Hybridization between Carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) and Goldfish (Carassius auratus L.) from Victorian Waters. Hume, DJ, Morison, Alexander and Fletcherb, Andrea. January 1983, Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, Vol. 34, pp. 915-919. 22. Koi x Goldfish Hybrid Females Produce Triploid Progeny When Backcrossed to Koi Males. Gomelsky, Boris, Schneider, Kyle J and Plouffe, Debbie. 2012, North American Journal of Aquaculture, Vol. 74, pp. 449-452. 23. Reproductive Biology of Carassius carassius (Cyprinidae) in Beni Haroun Dam, Algeria. Khelifi, Naima, et al. 3, s.l. : AACL Bioflux, 2019, Vol. 12, pp. 822-831. 24. Some Aspects of Reproductive Biology of the Crucian Carp Carassius Carassius in Lake Ziway, Ethiopia. Dadebo, Elias and Tugie, Daba. 2, s.l. : The Biological Society of Ethiopia, 2009, Ethiopian Journal of Biological Science, Vol. 8, pp. 109-121. 25. Hart, Steven, et al. Integrated Pest Management for Nuisance Exotics in Michigan Inland Lakes. s.l. : Michigan State University Extension, 2000. 68 26. Huber, T and Dawson, V. Developing and Integrated Pest Management Strategy. [ed.] V Dawson and C Kola. Integrated Pest Management Techniques to Control Nonnataive Fishes. s.l. : U.S. Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, 2003, pp. 81-86. 27. Dawson, V and Kolar, C. Integrated Management Techniques to Control Nonative Fishes. LaCrosse, Wisconsin : U.S. Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, 2003. 28. Bartodziej, William, et al. A Minnesota Story: Urban Shallow Lake Management. LakeLine. s.l. : North American Lake Management Society, 2017. Vol. Winter, pp. 23-29. 29. Sorensen, Peter, Bajer, Przemek and Headrick, Mary. Development and Implementation of a Sustainable Strategy to Control Common Carp in the Purgatory Creek Chain of Lakes. 2015. 30. Attracting Common Carp to a Bait Site with Food Reveals Strong Positive Relationships between Fish Density, Feeding Activity, Environmental DNA, and Sex Pheromone Release That Could be Used in Invasive Fish Management. Ghosal, Ratna, et al. 2018, Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 8. 31. Feeding Stimulants in an Omnivorous Species, Crucian Carp Carassius carassius (Linnaeus 1758). Olsen, K and Lundh, T. November 2016, Aquaculture Reports, Vol. 4, pp. 66-73. 32. An Evaluation of Attractants to Increase Catch Rates and Deplete Age-0 Common Carp in Shallow South Dakota Lakes. Carl, Dray, Weber, Michael and Brown, Michael. s.l. : American Fisheries Society, 2016, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Vol. 36, pp. 506-513. 33. Relative Size Selectivity of Trap Nets for Eight Species of Fish. Laarman, Percy and Ryckman, James. 1982, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Vol. 2, pp. 33-37. 34. The Chemical Sensitivity and Electrical Activity of Individual Olfactory Sensory Neurons to a Range of Sex Pheromones and Food Odors in the Goldfish. Sato, Koji and Sorensen, Peter. 2018, Chemical Senses, Vol. 43, pp. 249-260. 35. Nonnative Fishes Inhabiting the Streams and Lakes of Illinois. Laird, Christopher and Page, Lawrence. 1, March 1993, Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin, Vol. 35. 36. A Review of Fish Control Projects. Meronek, Thomas, et al. s.l. : American Fisheries Society, 1996, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Vol. 16, pp. 63-74. 37. Variation in Native Micro-Predator Abundance Explains Recruitment of a Mobile Invasive Fish, the Common Carp, in a Naturally Unstable Environment. Bajer, Przemyslaw, et al. 2012, Biological Invasions, Vol. 14, pp. 1919-1929. 38. Bluegill Recruitment, Growth, Population Size Structure, and Associated Factors in Minnesota Lakes. Tomcko, Cynthia M and Pierce, Rodney B. 2005, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Vol. 25, pp. 171-179. 69 39. Role of Aquatic Vegetation Coverage on Hypoxia and Sunfish Abundance in Bays of a Eutrophic Reservoir. Miranda, LE and Hodges, KB. 2000, Hydrobiologia, pp. 51-57. 40. Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) Spawning Periodicity and Hatching Duration in the Northern Great Plains, USA. Jolley, Jeffrey C, Edwards, Kris R and Willis, David W. 1, March 2009, Journal of Freshwater Ecology, Vol. 24, pp. 29-38. 41. Dynamics of Quality Bluegill Populations in Two Michigan Lakes with Dense Vegetation. Schneider, James C. 1, 1999, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Vol. 19. 42. Recruitment and Abundance of an Invasive Fish, the Common Carp, is Driven by its Propensity to Invade and Reproduce in Basins That Experience Winter-Time Hypoxia in Interconnected Lakes. Bajer, Przemyslaw and Sorensen, Peter. 2009, Biological Invasions, Vol. 12, pp. 1101-1112. 43. Clearwater, Susan J, Hickey, Chris W. and Martin, Michael L. Overview of Potential Piscicides and Molluscicides for Controlling Aquatic Pest Species in New Zealand. Wellington : Science and Technical Publishing, Department of Conservation, New Zealand, 2008. 44. Potential Distribution of the Viral Haemorrhagic Septicaemia Virus in the Great Lakes Region. Escobar, L E, et al. 2016, Journal of Fish Diseases, pp. 1-18. 45. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. MnDNR Lakefinder. [Online] [Cited: 03 31, 2020.] https://maps1.dnr.state.mn.us/lakefinder/mobile/. 46. —. Personal communication. December 4, 2018. 47. A Re-Evaluation of U.S. State Fish-Stocking Recommendations for Small, Private, Warmwater Impoundments. Dauwalter, Daniel and Jackson, John. 8, August 2005, Fisheries, Vol. 30, pp. 18-28. 48. Schneider, James A. A Fish Management Guide for Northern Prairie Farm Ponds. s.l. : Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Section of Fisheries, August 1983. 49. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Division. Lake Management Planning Guide. 1982. Appendices Appendix A December 18, 2019 Presentation to NMCWD Board of Managers on Rosland Park BMP Conceptual Design 1 Rosland Park Stormwater BMP Conceptual Designs Summary for Nine Mile Creek Watershed District December 18, 2019 Board Meeting Motivations- Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina do not meet State water quality standards 2 Motivations- Periodic blue green algal blooms Cornelia Blue Green Algae Blooms Water quality study results 3 Why stormwater treatment in Rosland Park? Large drainage area (shown in orange) flows to Swimming Pool Pond in Rosland Park before reaching Lake Cornelia. Stormwater treatment design goals/criteria •Treat as much stormwater as possible. Using ponds as storage allows us to treat more water (versus trying to capture the runoff from nearby parking lots/roads/buildings as it happens) •Target dissolved phosphorus removal. Much of the particulate phosphorus is already removed by the ponds. •Minimize footprint/park disruption 4 Conceptual Designs Concept #1: Underground Filtration Treatment Vault (Gravity flow) •Located in north parking lot Concept #2: Filtration Stream with Bioretention Pools (Pumped) •Located in green space northwest of north parking lot Concept #3: Filtration Treatment Vault (Pumped) •Located at the edge of the north parking lot Preferred concept Filtration Treatment Vault – example Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District Frost-Kennard Spent Lime Vault Filter 5 Concept #1: Underground Filtration treatment vault – (gravity flow) Concept #1: Underground Filtration treatment vault – (gravity flow) Concept 1 (pros) •Gravity system – no pumping required •Easily accessible for maintenance •No loss of park space or parking Concept 1 (cons) •Larger footprint •Concerns about walking and driving on grate •Concerns about difficulty maintaining gravity flow when N. Cornelia is high •Concerns about inundating the filter when N. Cornelia is high 6 Concept #2: filtration stream w/bioretention pools – pumped North Cornelia Swimming Pool Pond North Parking Lot Concept #2: filtration stream w/bioretention pools – pumped Concept 2 (pros) •Adds visual interest to park and Frisbee golf •Plants help maintain filtration capacity •High visibility for education Concept 2 (cons) •Loss of park open space and could be in conflict with future park plans •Difficult access for maintenance and maybe more maintenance required because of plants •Concerns about trampling of plants •Pumping – power consumption and O&M 7 Concept #3: Filtration Treatment Vault – pumped North Cornelia Swimming Pool Pond North Parking Lot Pump Concept #3: Filtration Treatment Vault – pumped Cross section 8 Concept #3: Filtration Treatment Vault – Plan view Concept #3: Filtration Treatment Vault – Example grates 9 Concept #3: Filtration Treatment Vault – filtered water is visible Concept #3: Filtration Treatment Vault – sketch 10 Concept #3: Filtration Treatment Vault – pumped Concept 3 (pros) •Easily accessible for maintenance •Minimal loss of park space •Adds visual interest to park •Visible to public—education and public art opportunities •Eliminates concerns about walking and driving on grate •Eliminates design challenges associated with a gravity system •Treatment even when its not raining, constant flow rate Concept 3 (cons) •Pumping – power consumption and O&M •Aesthetics? •Small loss of park space Option: Offset pump’s power consumption with solar Image to the left: Timber frame and SunCommon’s Solar Canopy. Source: The Beetle Blog: Snapshots and Stories from New Energy Works. Image source above: Woodford Country Journal and Smart Flower Solutions 11 Opportunities to integrate stormwater education and public art Opportunities to Improve the Appearance of the Exposed Vault 12 Decorative Railings - examples Other considerations •Maintenance- City would operate and maintain •Quasi-experimental nature of stormwater feature (potential to experiment with alternative filtration media) 13 Planning Level Costs – Construction, Engineering, 30% Contingency Concept 1: $590,000 Concept 2: Cost was not calculated Concept 3: $650,000 Add: •Decorative Facing on the concrete wall ~ $15,000 •Solar Power Generation Back to the Grid ~ $75,000 •Public Art and Education ~$25,000 to $100,000+ General Comparison of the Concepts •All concepts treat a similar annual volume and have similar removal rates •Concept 1 and Concept 3 have similar construction costs •Edina staff prefer Concept 3 •Edina Parks Commission seemed to favor Concept 3 14 Next Steps •Present preferred conceptual design to Edina City Council •Feasibility analysis/preliminary design on preferred concept– January - April Appendix B University of Minnesota Report: Assessment of Internal Phosphorus Loading in Swimming Pool Pond and Point of France Pond Project Report No. 587 Assessment of Internal Phosphorus Loading in Swimming Pool Pond and Point of France Pond, City of Edina Final Report By Poornima Natarajan John S. Gulliver St. Anthony Falls Laboratory University of Minnesota 2 Third Avenue SE Minneapolis, MN 55455 Prepared for: City of Edina 7450 Metro Blvd. Edina, MN 55439 March 2019 Minneapolis, Minnesota i Acknowledgements This project was a contract between the City of Edina and the University of Minnesota St. Anthony Falls Laboratory (SAFL). Support from the City of Edina including Ross Bintner and Jessica Vanderwerff Wilson, and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District is greatly appreciated. The assistance from Peter Corkery, Peter Olson, Vinicius Taguchi and Robert Gabrielson with field sampling and laboratory analysis at SAFL is greatly appreciated. ii Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................... III LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................... IV 1. Introduction ...............................................................................................................................5 2. Methods ......................................................................................................................................5 2a. Site description .............................................................................................................. 5 2b. Laboratory phosphorus (P) release study ...................................................................... 6 2c. In-situ water quality sampling ....................................................................................... 8 3. Results .........................................................................................................................................9 3a. Oxic and anoxic phosphorus release rates ..................................................................... 9 3b. Sediment phosphorus fractions ................................................................................... 11 3c. In situ water quality ..................................................................................................... 13 4. Summary and Recommendations ..........................................................................................17 References ........................................................................................................................................19 Appendix A ......................................................................................................................................20 iii List of Figures Figure 1. Locations of the Swimming Pool Pond and Point of France Pond in the City of Edina, Hennepin County, MN. (source: <www.maps.google.com>) .......................................... 6 Figure 2. Sediment core collection from the (a) Swimming Pool Pond in February 2018, and (b) Point of France Pond in July 2018. ........................................................................................ 7 Figure 3. Locations of water sample collection and DO, temperature and conductivity profile monitoring (red circles) in the (a) Swimming Pool Pond and (b) Point of France Pond. ............ 9 Figure 4. Phosphorus release from the (a) Swimming Pool Pond and (b) Point of France Pond sediment cores under oxic (air bubbling), air off, and anoxic (N2 bubbling) phases at 20 °C. . 10 Figure 5. Average water column dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations after air supply was switched off in the sediment cores from the (a) Swimming Pool Pond and (b) Point of France Pond. .......................................................................................................................................... 10 Figure 6. Phosphorus fractions in the upper 10 cm of sediments in the (a) Swimming Pool Pond and (b) Point of France Pond sediment cores. Average concentrations in five sediment cores are plotted. ........................................................................................................................ 12 Figure 7. Sediment phosphorus fractions in the upper 4 cm of sediment cores collected from the Swimming Pool Pond and Point of France Pond along with other other stormwater ponds in the Twin Cities Metro area. ....................................................................................................... 13 Figure 8. In situ phosphorus water quality from May to September 2018 in the (a) Swimming Pool Pond and (b) Point of France Pond. Average phosphorus concentrations in the epilimnion water samples collected from five locations in the pond are shown. ......................................... 14 Figure 9. Median epilimnion grab sample values in the Swimming Pool Pond and Point of France Pond plotted along with stormwater ponds monitored by Taguchi et al. (2018b) (colored circles) in the exceedance probability distribution of total phosphorus concentrations in the RPBCWD ponds. ............................................................................................................. 15 Figure 10. Time series contour plots of temperature, specific conductivity (SC), and dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations in the (a) Swimming Pool Pond and (b) Point of France Pond from May to September 2018. ................................................................................................... 16 iv List of Tables Table 1. Comparison of internal phosphorus release from sediments of the Swimming Pool Pond and Point of France Pond with other stormwater ponds in the Twin Cities Metro area (data fromTaguchi et al. 2018b)................................................................................................. 11 Table A- 1. Phosphorus water quality data for the Swimming Pool Pond from May to September 2018. ........................................................................................................................ 20 Table A- 2. Phosphorus water quality data for the Point of France Pond from May to September 2018. ........................................................................................................................ 21 Table A- 3. Dissolved oxygen (DO), temperature (T), and specific conductivity (SC) data for the Swimming Pool Pond from May to September 2018. ......................................................... 22 Table A- 4. Dissolved oxygen (DO), temperature (T), and specific conductivity (SC) data for the Point of France Pond from May to September 2018. .......................................................... 25 5 1. Introduction Stormwater ponds are widely implemented stormwater control measures (SCMs) for runoff quantity and quality control in urban areas. They are primarily used to remove solids and associated pollutants such as phosphorus from runoff. There is increasing evidence, however, that some ponds are no longer retaining phosphorus, and have become potential source of phosphorus (Song et al. 2015). In the Twin Cities area, a water quality survey conducted in 98 stormwater ponds in the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD) showed <0.010 mg/L to 8.1 mg/L total phosphorus in the ponds (Forster et al. 2012; RPBCWD 2014). Further examination of the data showed that 39% of the 98 ponds contained median TP greater than 0.38 mg/L, the 95% confidence interval (CI) of expected TP in the Twin Cities Metro Area (Janke et al. 2017; Taguchi et al. 2018b). The high phosphorus level in the ponds above typical runoff concentration was hypothesized to be due to internal phosphorus release from the sediments. Laboratory sediment cores and field-scale monitoring of phosphorus mass inputs and outputs in five ponds provided evidences of internal loading in those ponds (Olsen 2017; Taguchi et al. 2018b). Since ponds are part of the watershed network that delivers runoff with phosphorus to lakes and streams, high phosphorus load and algae in ponds present increased risks of harmful algal bloom occurrences and water quality degradation in the receiving waterbodies. Therefore, there is a need to assess stormwater ponds so that management strategies to control phosphorus pollution from ponds can be developed. This project was originally proposed as a two-part study to assess and treat internal phosphorus loading in two stormwater ponds in the City of Edina, the Swimming Pool Pond and the Point of France Pond. The objective of the first part of the study was to investigate internal phosphorus release from the pond sediments by measuring phosphorus release from pond sediment cores incubated in the laboratory and monitoring the in situ water quality. If internal loading was found to be substantial, the objective of the second part of the study was to chemically-inactivate the sediment phosphorus by treatment. This report presents results of the first part of the study, i.e., internal phosphorus loading assessment in the two ponds, and provides recommendations for pond phosphorus treatment. 2. Methods 2a. Site description The Swimming Pool Pond (area = 0.0125 km2; depth = 0.305 – 2.13 m) and the Point of France Pond (area = 0.0257 km2; depth = 0.305 – 2.44 m) are located south of Hwy 62 in the City of Edina (Figure 1). The ponds are located in a heavily-urbanized area, consisting of commercial and high-density residential land use, in the north Lake Cornelia watershed (part of Lower Minnesota River watershed), in the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Outflows from the Point of France Pond are routed to the Swimming Pool Pond, which in turn discharges into north 6 Lake Cornelia, a 303(d) list impaired lake due to eutrophic conditions. Toxic algae were reported in the lake in summer 2016 and 2017. Figure 1. Locations of the Swimming Pool Pond and Point of France Pond in the City of Edina, Hennepin County, MN. (source: <www.maps.google.com>) 2b. Laboratory phosphorus (P) release study i.Pond sediment coring Sediment cores were collected from the Swimming Pool Pond in February 2018. Six intact cores, containing approximately 0.2 m sediment and 0.8 m overlying pond water, were collected by driving a piston corer through holes drilled in ice (Figure 2a). Five sediment cores from the Point of France Pond were collected from a canoe in July 2018 (Figure 2b). The P release study on the Point of France Pond sediments was conducted based on the Swimming Pool Pond study results, hence the sediment coring was performed in the later part of summer. 7 Figure 2. Sediment core collection from the (a) Swimming Pool Pond in February 2018, and (b) Point of France Pond in July 2018. ii.Sediment-water columns The cores collected from the ponds were incubated at 20 °C at the St. Anthony Falls Laboratory (SAFL). The water column above the sediment was drained, filtered to remove particulates and refilled into the columns. In the first phase of the P release experiments, the water column was mixed by air bubbling to determine if oxic P release occurred from the sediments. Then, air bubbling was switched off, and the dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration in the water 8 cm above the sediment, and the concomitant P release were monitored. In the final phase, P release was measured under an anoxic water column created by bubbling ultrapure nitrogen gas (DO < 1 mg/L). When the water column was kept mixed with air or nitrogen gas, water samples for P measurements were drawn from the center of the water columns, on an approximately weekly basis. In the unmixed phase (air off), one water sample was taken ~8 cm above the sediment and a second sample at the center of the total water column height. Two sampling points were necessary because a concentration gradient can develop during unmixed state, and the two measurements were used to estimate the average P concentration in the entire water column. The frequency of water sampling was adjusted from 1 day to 7 days during the unmixed phase to observe the rate of change of P mass in the water column. The increase in ortho-phosphorus (ortho-P) mass (where, mass = concentration × water volume) during a given incubation period was used to determine the P release rate (mg/m2/day, i.e., P mass per sediment surface area of the core per time). P flux during the unmixed phase was determined using data from the first 15 days. The mean P release and 67% confidence interval (CI) of the mean was calculated for each (a) (b) 8 phase. As a measure of the sediment oxygen demand (SOD), the Michaelis-Menten kinetic model was fit to the DO levels in the unmixed water column (air off phase) (Olsen 2017): 𝑆𝑆=𝑆𝑆𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚[𝐶𝐶𝑂𝑂2]𝐾𝐾𝑀𝑀+[𝐶𝐶𝑂𝑂2] where S is the substrate consumption rate, Smax is the maximum dissolved oxygen consumption rate, CO2 is the substrate (oxygen) concentration, and KM is the half-consumption concentration. A constant KM of 1.4 mg/L was used for all cores. The assumption is that all DO reduction comes from the microbial oxygen demand of the sediments, so KM represents the surface of the sediments. iii.Sediment phosphorus fractionation At the end of core incubation, the top 10 cm of the sediments was extruded from the columns and analyzed for P species using the sequential chemical extraction procedure (Engstrom 2010). The amounts of loosely-bound P, iron-bound P, aluminum-bound P, mineral-bound P, labile organic P and residual organic P in the sediments were determined at 1-cm interval for the 0 – 5 cm depth and at 2- or 3-cm interval for the 5 – 10 cm depth. The P forms were used to understand the potential for P release under changing environmental conditions (loosely-bound P is dissolved or easily disassociated from a solid; iron-bound P is attached to an iron compound in the sediments; aluminum-bound P is attached to an aluminum compound in the sediments; mineral-bound P is attached to other minerals (typically calcium) in the sediments; labile organic P is the organic P that is available for microbial degradation, and residual organic P is not available for microbial degradation). Water content and organic matter content (loss on ignition at 550 °C) were also determined in the sediment samples. 2c. In-situ water quality sampling Water quality of the ponds was sampled on a bi-weekly basis from May through September 2018. Surface grab water samples were collected from 5 to 6 locations (Figure 3) using a Van Dorn sampler, and analyzed for total phosphorus, dissolved phosphorus, and soluble reactive phosphorus concentrations (Standard Methods 4500-P, APHA AWWA, WPCF 1995) using a spectrophotometer (detection limit = 10 µg/L P). If stratification was detected, an additional water sample was collected below the stratification depth. The surface to bottom profiles of DO, temperature and conductivity were also taken at 25-cm intervals using a Hach WQ40D handheld meter with DO and conductivity sensors. 9 Figure 3. Locations of water sample collection and DO, temperature and conductivity profile monitoring (red circles) in the (a) Swimming Pool Pond and (b) Point of France Pond. 3.Results 3a. Oxic and anoxic phosphorus release rates Under aerated (oxic) conditions, the Swimming Pool Pond sediment cores maintained low ortho- P levels in the water columns (Figure 4a). The average P release rate of -0.14 ± 0.08 (67% CI) mg/m2/day suggested a small decrease in the water column ortho-P concentration occurred under oxic conditions. Once the air supply was switched off, the water column DO levels started decreasing due to the sediment oxygen demand (Figure 5a). The DO concentrations dropped below 1 mg/L after ~5 days in most cores. Smax, the maximum oxygen consumption by the biologically active sediments, ranged between 1.76 and 4.2 g/m2/day in the six cores. As DO was consumed, the pond sediments started releasing P resulting in increased ortho-P concentrations in the water columns. However, measurable P increase occurred in only three out of the six cores. The average P release from the six cores was thus relatively small at 1.16 ± 0.45 mg/m2/day during the first 15 days of the 22-day unmixed phase. In the next phase with an anoxic mixed water column, ortho-P release continued to occur at 1.09 ± 0.36 (67% CI) mg/m2/day. The sediment cores that appeared to be sandy (collected near the pond inlets) showed minimal P release under the two anoxic phases. Similar results were obtained for the Point of France Pond sediment cores (Figure 4b). A very small release of sediment P occurred under oxic conditions (0.83 ± 0.23 mg/m2/day), which can be attributed to the mineralization of labile organic phosphorus in the sediments (Jensen and Andersen 1992). After the air supply was turned off, it took almost 7 days for the DO levels to reach below 1 mg/L, and the Smax ranged between 2.0 and 4.9 g/m2/day in the five cores (Figure 5b). Once again, responses to low DO conditions were highly variable among the five cores, yielding an average P release rate of 4.09 ± 3.21 mg/m2/day during the air off phase (note the 67% CI). This average P release under anoxic conditions is relatively high. In contrast, the Swimming Pool Pond Point of France Pond (a) (b) 10 following phase with an anoxic mixed water column had an anoxic P release from these sediments that was relatively low at 0.39 ± 0.17 mg/m2/day. Figure 4. Phosphorus (ortho-P) release from the (a) Swimming Pool Pond and (b) Point of France Pond sediment cores under oxic (air bubbling), air off, and anoxic (N2 bubbling) phases at 20 °C. Solid lines separate the three phases of the P release study. Figure 5. Average water column dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations after air supply was switched off in the sediment cores from the (a) Swimming Pool Pond and (b) Point of France Pond. Measurements were taken at 8 cm above the sediment surface. Error bars are 67% confidence interval (CI) of the mean measurements. (a) (b) (a) (b) 11 The P release rates for the two Edina pond sediments were compared to other ponds in the Twin Cities Metro area (Table 1; Taguchi et al. 2018b). The anoxic P release rates and the DO depletion rates for the Swimming Pool Pond and Point of France Pond are relatively low when compared to some of the high P release-ponds. Low sediment microbial activity, which is supported by the lower sediment oxygen demand and organic matter content, is related to the P release rate from the sediments. This is because oxygen demand is indicative of opportunistic aerobic respiration by microbes and organic matter present a source of microbial food (Taguchi et al. 2018b). Table 1. Comparison of internal phosphorus release from sediments of the Swimming Pool Pond and Point of France Pond with other stormwater ponds in the Twin Cities Metro area (data from Taguchi et al. 2018b). Pond Oxic Flux Rate (mg/m2/day) Anoxic Flux Rate (mg/m2/day) Smax (g/m2/day) Organic matter content (%)* A -1.27 ± 0.71 7.51 ± 2.93 4.21 ± 0.47 30% B -0.14 ± 0.76 5.62 ± 1.80 4.23 ± 0.95 86% C -4.38 ± 2.89 1.09 ± 0.26 1.94 ± 0.19 15% D -5.80 ± 1.94 2.27 ± 0.49 1.85 ± 0.63 16% E -19.78 ± 3.37 3.18 ± 2.76 5.19 ± 0.59 27% Swimming Pool Pond -0.14 ± 0.08 1.16 ± 0.45 3.07 ± 0.48 19% Point of France Pond 0.83 ± 0.23 4.09 ± 3.21 2.51 ± 0.53 24% *upper 11 or 10 cm sediments 3b. Sediment phosphorus fractions The water content in the Swimming Pool Pond sediments ranged from 71 – 91% in the four cores analyzed, and these cores contained an average of 23% dry weight organic matter content in the upper 10 cm depth. One core, which was collected near the pond inlet, was predominantly sandy in appearance and contained 15% moisture content and 2% organic matter content. The sediment core collected near the inlet in the Point of France contained 40% moisture content and 7% organic matter content. The other sediment core samples contained 66 – 91% water content and an average of 27% organic matter content. The sediment P pool in the Swimming Pool Pond and Point of France Pond cores provided an indication of the relationship between the observed P release in the laboratory cores and the releasable phosphorus fractions. The average concentrations of the various phosphorus species in the upper 10 cm sediment depth of the cores from the two ponds is plotted in Figure 6. In the Swimming Pool Pond, the average total P pool in the top 4 cm of sediments was composed of <0.05% loosely-bound P, 11% iron-bound P, 14% aluminum-bound P, 28% mineral-bound P, 12 32% labile organic P and 15% residual P. The Point of France Pond sediment’s total P fractionation consisted of 0.18% loosely-bound P, 9.3% iron-bound P, 22% aluminum-bound P, 29% mineral-bound P, 21% labile organic P and 19% residual P, on average. The cores with sandier appearance varied from other cores in the P composition; they generally contained a large fraction of mineral-bound P and were low in organic P (data not shown). Overall, more P was tied up in the relatively unavailable forms in the sediments (i.e., Al- and mineral-bound) than the P present in the easily-releasable forms (i.e., loosely-bound and iron-bound). Labile organic P, that has the potential to become bioavailable after being broken down by microbacteria, was the more substantial mobile P form in the pond sediments. Figure 6. Phosphorus fractions in the upper 10 cm of sediments in the (a) Swimming Pool Pond and (b) Point of France Pond sediment cores. Average concentrations in five sediment cores are plotted. For each depth interval, concentration is plotted at the mid-point of the depth interval (for example, concentration for 0 – 1 cm depth is plotted at 0.5 cm). Comparison to other stormwater ponds sampled by Taguchi et al. (2018) provides a perspective on the mobilization of phosphorus from the pond sediments (Figure 7). The upper 4 cm of sediments from the Edina ponds contained relatively low amounts of the redox-sensitive forms of phosphorus, i.e., the loosely-bound and iron-bound fractions. The potentially-releasable labile organic P in the Edina pond sediments was lower than ponds A and B that exhibited high anoxic P release rates (Table 1). Phosphorus was mostly associated with aluminum and calcium in the Edina pond sediments, and this phosphorus is not influenced by changes in oxygen conditions. (a) (b) 13 The low anoxic P releases measured from the Edina ponds are thus explained by the relatively low concentrations of redox-P and organic P species. Figure 7. Sediment phosphorus fractions in the upper 4 cm of sediment cores collected from the Swimming Pool Pond and Point of France Pond along with other stormwater ponds in the Twin Cities Metro area (data from Taguchi et al. 2018b) (Error bars are standard deviations). Loosely-bound P is primarily dissolved P in the pore water, labile organic bound P can be converted into ortho-P over time, mineral-bound is primarily associated with calcium, and residual organic bound P is considered refractory. 3c. In situ water quality The water quality data collected in 2018 are provided in Appendix A (Table A- 1 and Table A- 2). The phosphorus concentrations in the pond water were generally in the low to moderate range during the growing season (Figure 8). In the Swimming Pool Pond, the average concentrations in the epilimnion grab water samples contained 59 – 167 µg/L total phosphorus, 10 – 44 µg/L dissolved phosphorus and 1 – 22 µg/L soluble reactive phosphorus. Concentrations in the Point of France Pond were in a similar range; 69 – 135 µg/L total phosphorus, 10 – 85 µg/L dissolved phosphorus and 1 – 34 µg/L soluble reactive phosphorus. The May to September average was 94 ± 35 (Std. Dev.) µg/L total phosphorus, 32 ± 11 µg/L dissolved phosphorus and 13 ± 6 µg /L soluble reactive phosphorus in the Swimming Pool Pond. Point of France Pond contained 97 ± 23 µg/L total phosphorus, 36 ± 21 µg/L dissolved phosphorus and 15 ± 10 µg /L soluble reactive phosphorus during summer. 14 Figure 8. In situ phosphorus water quality from May to September 2018 in the (a) Swimming Pool Pond and (b) Point of France Pond. Average phosphorus concentrations in the epilimnion water samples collected from five locations in the pond are shown. Error bars are 67% CI of the mean measurements. Water samples were collected on a biweekly basis. The median TP concentrations in the Swimming Pool Pond and Point of France Pond are compared to five other stormwater ponds intensively monitored by Taguchi et al. (2018b), who also developed the probability exceedance distribution of TP concentrations in the RPBCWD ponds (Figure 9). The TP concentrations in the Swimming Pool Pond and Point of France Pond were much lower than 0.38 mg/L, the upper 95% CI of expected runoff TP in the Twin Cities (a) (b) 15 Metro Area (Janke et al. 2017). The TP levels were also much lower than the median concentrations monitored in other stormwater ponds in the area. Figure 9. Median epilimnion grab sample values in the Swimming Pool Pond and Point of France Pond plotted along with stormwater ponds monitored by Taguchi et al. (2018b) (colored circles) in the exceedance probability distribution of total phosphorus concentrations in the RPBCWD ponds (figure adapted from Taguchi et al. 2018b). Red line is the upper 95% confidence interval (CI) of the expected TP in runoff in the Twin Cities Metro area. The DO, temperature, and conductivity measured in the ponds over the entire summer period are summarized in Appendix A (Table A- 3 and Table A- 4). The in situ DO concentrations and water temperature presented evidence of mixed water column conditions in the ponds, which could be a reason for the low to moderate phosphorus levels in the pond water. The Swimming Pool Pond was mixed and oxic during most of the summer (Figure 10a). Bottom DO lower than 1 mg/L was detected only during two instances in August 2018 (see 8/8/18 and 8/22/18 data in Table A- 3), although it is possible that the DO probe was in the sediments at those low depths and recorded very low DO concentration. In the Point of France Pond, thermal stratification and low bottom DO were observed intermittently (Figure 10b), although DO less than 1 mg/L was not recorded anytime (Table A- 4). Nonetheless, strong thermal stratification that could cause the pond bottom to turn anoxic was not observed in both pond during summer 2018. 16 Figure 10. Time series contour plots of temperature, specific conductivity (SC), and dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations in the (a) Swimming Pool Pond and (b) Point of France Pond from May to September 2018. Vertical lines show times when profiles were taken at the ponds; linear interpolation is used to fill the time series between pond visits. A 1 mg/L DO threshold is indicated by black line, which is visible only in the DO plot for the Swimming Pool Pond during August 2018. (a) (b) 17 High conductivity was measured from the beginning of monitoring in May 2018, and was likely high prior to May sampling. Such high specific conductivity values are attributed to chlorides contributed by road salt input (Taguchi et al. 2018b). Conductivity gradually decreased from May through August as chloride was flushed out of the pond, although it took longer for the chloride levels to drop in the Swimming Pool Pond, which is downstream of the Point of France Pond. Chemostratification is a phenomenon that has been observed in some ponds that exhibited strong summertime stratification and low bottom DO (Taguchi et al. 2018b). However, such stratification due to high chloride concentrations did not appear to be strong and impact DO levels in the Edina ponds. The maintenance of primarily oxic and well-mixed water column in situ suggests that conditions are less favorable for internal P release to occur from the sediments during the warmer months. Under oxic conditions, the sediments exhibited very low or no release of P (Table 1), which means P contribution from internal loading can be expected to be negligible in both ponds. In addition to mixing due to stormwater inflows, it is hypothesized that low sheltering from trees around the ponds was a factor in aiding wind mixing of the pond water column and thus preventing a sustained stratification that could have led to anoxia. 4. Summary and Recommendations a)The Swimming Pool Pond sediments did not release P under oxic conditions. Low P release occurred under anoxic conditions, at a rate of 1.16 ± 0.45 mg/m2/day. b) In the Point of France Pond, very low oxic P release was measured (0.83 ± 0.23 mg/m2/day). Anoxic P release rate was relatively low and highly variable among the sediment cores, at 4.09 ± 3.21 mg/m2/day. c)The impact of water column dissolved oxygen concentrations on the P release behavior was variable among the sediment cores, indicating the influence of sediment microbial activity and sediment characteristics on the potential for sediment P release. d)Characterization of the sediment P fractions showed majority of P in the redox insensitive aluminum- and mineral-bound pool, i.e., not releasable under low oxygen conditions. The readily-mobile form of redox-P and potentially-mobile organic P were present in low (redox- P)to moderate (labile organic P) concentrations when compared to other stormwater ponds in the Twin Cities. The sediment P composition supports the low anoxic P release rates measured in the laboratory cores. e)In situ monitoring showed low to moderate total phosphorus concentrations in the ponds during the growing season. f)Surface to bottom profiles of DO and temperature were indicative of a mixed water column in the ponds during most of summer 2018, with intermittent stratification that lasted only for a brief amount of time. g) High conductivity was measured in the ponds in May 2018, likely due to chlorides from road salt input. Gradual decrease in conductivity was noticed due to the mixing of pond water and flushing out of chloride in the pond discharge. 18 h)Together, these data suggest that conditions in the ponds are such that the water columns are mixed and primarily oxic during warmer months, indicating little to no internal P release and a minor impact on the pond water column phosphorus concentration. i) Present conditions in the Swimming Pool Pond and Point of France Pond suggest that the ponds are providing treatment of phosphorus. Thus, chemical treatment of sediment to reduce internal phosphorus loading is currently not recommended. j)Should conditions change to favor the development of anoxia in the pond, the potential for internal P release from the pond sediments could increase. One scenario would be increase in sheltering around the ponds that would result in poor mixing and stronger stratification causing low DO in the bottom of the pond. It is recommended that the sheltering around the pond be kept minimal to allow wind mixing of the pond. 19 References APHA, AWWA, WPCF (1995), Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th Ed., American Public Health Association (APHA), the American Water Works Association (AWWA), and the Water Environment Federation (WEF, former Water Pollution Control Federation or WPCF), Washington, D.C. Engstrom, D. (2010). Sediment phosphorus extraction procedure high sample throughput. Modified by Robert Dietz and Michelle Natarajan (2015). Forster, P., Austin, D., Scharf, R., Carroll, J., and Enochs, M. (2012). Rethinking stormwater pond nutrient removal. Oral presentation at the 2012 Minnesota Water Resources Conference. St. Paul, MN. Janke, B. D., Finlay, J. C., and Hobbie, S. E. (2017). “Trees and streets as drivers of urban stormwater nutrient pollution.” Environmental Science & Technology, 51(17), 9569-9579. Jensen, H.S., and Andersen, F.O. (1992). Importance of Temperature, Nitrate, and pH for Phosphate Release from Aerobic Sediments of Four Shallow Eutrophic Lakes. Limnology and Oceanography, 37(3), 577-589. Olsen, T. (2017). Phosphorus dynamics in stormwater ponds. Master’s Thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District (2014). Stormwater pond project: 2013 Report, 1-54. <http://rpbcwd.org/news/2013-stormwater-pond-report/> (accessed January 2016). Song, K., Xenopoulos, M. A., Marsalek, J., and Frost, P. C. (2015). “The fingerprints of urban nutrients: dynamics of phosphorus speciation in water flowing through developed landscapes.” Biogeochemistry, 125, 1-10. Taguchi, V., Olsen, T., Natarajan, P., Janke, B., Finlay, J., Stefan, H. G., Gulliver, J.S., and Bleser, C.S. (2018a.) Urban stormwater ponds can be a source of phosphorus. UPDATES Newsletter, 13(2), St. Anthony Falls Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. Taguchi, V., Olsen, T., Janke, B., Stefan, H. G., Finlay, J., and Gulliver, J.S. ( 2018b). Phosphorus release from stormwater ponds, Chapter in Stormwater Research Priorities and Pond Maintenance, Final Report, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, St. Paul, MN. 20 Appendix A Table A- 1. Phosphorus water quality data for the Swimming Pool Pond from May to September 2018. 5/16/18 5/16/18 5/16/18 5/30/18 5/30/18 5/30/18 6/13/18 6/13/18 6/13/18 6/27/18 6/27/18 6/27/18 7/11/18 7/11/18 7/11/18 TP (µg/L) TDP (µg/L) SRP (µg/L) TP (µg/L) TDP (µg/L) SRP (µg/L) TP (µg/L) TDP (µg/L) SRP (µg/L) TP (µg/L) TDP (µg/L) SRP (µg/L) TP (µg/L) TDP (µg/L) SRP (µg/L) Site 1 Epi 57 42 13 74 45 19 58 29 8 131 58 16 115 37 20 Site 1 Hypo 71 34 19 Site 2 Epi 61 39 17 83 42 21 68 36 14 126 53 16 110 34 18 Site 2 Hypo 90 32 21 134 51 6 120 45 18 Site 3 Epi 84 53 13 89 45 19 66 53 23 99 25 6 100 42 22 Site 3 Hypo 76 6 13 67 22 15 Site 4 Epi 117 17 27 94 40 19 53 38 16 132 38 12 127 52 20 Site 4 Hypo 85 44 23 117 35 10 Site 5 Epi 57 20 13 74 32 21 71 48 10 107 40 8 130 50 22 Site 5 Hypo 126 49 17 Site 6 Epi 47 49 17 91 29 15 71 33 12 109 40 6 96 47 30 Site 6 Hypo 76 29 21 7/26/18 7/26/18 7/26/18 8/8/18 8/8/18 8/8/18 8/22/18 8/22/18 8/22/18 9/11/18 9/11/18 9/11/18 9/26/18 9/26/18 9/26/18 TP (µg/L) TDP (µg/L) SRP (µg/L) TP (µg/L) TDP (µg/L) SRP (µg/L) TP (µg/L) TDP (µg/L) SRP (µg/L) TP (µg/L) TDP (µg/L) SRP (µg/L) TP (µg/L) TDP (µg/L) SRP (µg/L) Site 1 Epi 108 40 14 86 27 13 Site 1 Hypo 102 24 14 Site 2 Epi 110 45 10 76 27 14 169 32 6 64 38 1 70 10 10 Site 2 Hypo Site 3 Epi 158 53 18 76 39 11 181 32 3 84 12 1 54 10 9 Site 3 Hypo Site 4 Epi 128 43 14 71 21 13 158 22 5 83 9 1 54 10 10 Site 4 Hypo 89 27 13 Site 5 Epi 136 33 18 72 29 13 150 27 6 42 61 1 63 10 9 Site 5 Hypo 101 31 14 152 20 1 Site 6 Epi 116 30 12 71 24 13 180 17 10 55 6 1 56 10 9 21 Table A- 2. Phosphorus water quality data for the Point of France Pond from May to September 2018. 5/16/18 5/16/18 5/16/18 5/30/18 5/30/18 5/30/18 6/13/18 6/13/18 6/13/18 6/27/18 6/27/18 6/27/18 7/11/18 7/11/18 7/11/18 TP TDP SRP TP TDP SRP TP TDP SRP TP TDP SRP TP TDP SRP Site 1 Epi 83 33 25 106 27 27 120 83 35 91 10 10 118 50 10 Site 1 Hypo 207 22 27 118 27 23 Site 2 Epi 109 32 23 115 118 35 73 40 10 125 37 10 Site 2 Hypo 86 56 12 133 34 14 Site 3 Epi 100 63 21 136 34 25 128 76 37 78 38 12 116 40 12 Site 3 Hypo 67 14 19 95 25 25 133 73 37 137 32 12 Site 4 Epi 91 25 25 115 78 37 81 35 14 114 45 14 Site 4 Hypo 138 78 35 167 37 18 Site 5 Epi 86 53 21 142 44 30 120 71 35 94 35 16 117 26 10 Site 5 Hypo 96 33 17 84 59 28 135 73 31 101 33 18 Site 6 Epi 133 44 28 116 83 29 115 30 14 105 19 10 Site 6 Hypo 91 47 27 133 83 38 84 45 21 127 29 12 7/26/18 7/26/18 7/26/18 8/8/18 8/8/18 8/8/18 8/22/18 8/22/18 8/22/18 9/11/18 9/11/18 9/11/18 9/26/18 9/26/18 9/26/18 TP TDP SRP TP TDP SRP TP TDP SRP TP TDP SRP TP TDP SRP Site 1 Epi 133 43 8 73 29 13 99 17 1 68 6 3 78 38 12 Site 1 Hypo 72 24 18 87 25 1 Site 2 Epi 143 33 14 76 29 14 82 25 3 61 1 1 80 16 12 Site 2 Hypo 64 26 16 Site 3 Epi 132 48 16 61 36 14 70 34 1 120 22 1 109 12 14 Site 3 Hypo Site 4 Epi 145 55 8 64 24 14 66 18 1 58 9 1 92 10 10 Site 4 Hypo 81 24 14 Site 5 Epi 132 38 18 71 27 13 Site 5 Hypo Site 6 Epi 128 28 6 67 26 13 80 27 1 48 12 1 75 9 12 Site 6 Hypo 22 Table A- 3. Dissolved oxygen (DO), temperature (T), and specific conductivity (SC) data for the Swimming Pool Pond from May to September 2018. H is the depth of sampling in the water column. SITE 1 SITE 2 SITE 3 Sampling date H (m) DO (mg/L) T °C SC (µs/cm) H (m) DO (mg/L) T °C SC (µs/cm) H (m) DO (mg/L) T °C SC (µs/cm) 5/16/18 0.00 9.6 18.8 2972 0.00 10.4 18.7 2969 0.00 10.1 19.1 2955 0.25 12.7 18.1 2992 0.25 10.4 18.9 2964 0.25 10.2 19.0 2953 0.50 15.7 17.0 3263 0.50 10.3 19.0 2959 0.50 10.4 19.0 2963 0.75 0.75 10.5 19.0 2961 0.75 15.1 18.5 2952 1.00 1.00 18.3 18.2 3379 1.25 5/30/18 0.00 4.4 23.9 2430 0.00 4.2 24.2 2350 0.00 5.3 24.2 2210 0.25 3.9 24.3 2430 0.25 4.0 24.1 2153 0.25 5.1 24.3 2199 0.50 2.8 23.8 2040 0.50 4.1 24.3 2160 0.50 5.1 24.3 2200 0.60 1.4 23.8 2067 0.75 3.5 24.2 2290 0.75 5.0 24.3 2200 1.00 4.3 24.2 2037 1.00 2.9 24.3 2220 1.05 2.57 24.4 2220 6/13/18 0.00 6.4 21.5 2200 0.00 6.8 21.8 2230 0.00 8.1 21.7 2230 0.25 6.7 21.4 2163 0.25 6.8 21.8 2230 0.25 7.3 21.7 2220 0.40 6.6 21.3 2154 0.50 7.4 21.7 2210 0.50 6.9 21.6 2220 0.75 5.6 21.7 2230 0.75 6.6 21.6 2220 1.00 5.5 21.5 2220 6/27/18 0.00 3.7 22.8 949 0.00 3.3 23.2 1044 0.00 4.3 23.2 1001 0.25 3.4 22.9 939 0.25 3.4 23.2 1058 0.25 4.3 23.2 980 0.50 2.8 22.9 929 0.50 3.5 23.2 1061 0.50 4.4 23.1 977 0.60 1.7 22.7 914 0.75 1.7 22.9 975 0.75 4.4 23.2 972 1.00 1.1 22.9 987 1.00 3.2 23.0 975 1.10 2.8 23.0 833 7/11/18 0.00 5.3 25.8 726 0.00 5.4 26.1 723 0.00 5.7 26.2 730 0.25 5.0 26.1 724 0.25 5.3 26.3 722 0.25 5.7 26.3 729 0.50 3.6 25.8 719 0.50 5.0 26.2 722 0.50 5.6 26.3 727 0.60 3.1 25.9 725 0.75 4.7 26.1 719 0.75 5.5 26.3 721 1.00 1.8 25.9 657 1.00 4.8 26.2 724 7/26/18 0.00 5.5 22.5 554 0.00 5.5 23.0 547 0.00 6.1 23.3 557 0.25 5.3 22.9 550 0.25 5.5 23.2 546 0.25 6.0 23.6 556 0.50 5.2 22.9 549 0.50 5.6 23.1 545 0.50 5.9 23.5 555 0.75 5.4 23.2 545 0.75 5.9 23.5 555 1.00 5.8 23.5 553 8/8/18 0.00 8.5 25.1 368 0.00 11.7 25.6 384 0.00 12.2 25.8 385 0.25 6.1 24.1 359 0.25 11.6 25.5 384 0.25 12.3 25.4 382 0.47 6.1 23.9 358 0.50 8.9 24.5 382 0.50 9.6 24.6 382 0.75 10.6 24.9 382 0.75 7.2 24.4 386 1.00 7.9 24.2 384 1.00 5.2 24.3 393 8/22/18 0.00 9.5 22.8 683 0.00 9.4 23.1 687 0.25 9.5 23.0 683 0.25 7.8 22.7 598 23 SITE 1 SITE 2 SITE 3 Sampling date H (m) DO (mg/L) T °C SC (µs/cm) H (m) DO (mg/L) T °C SC (µs/cm) H (m) DO (mg/L) T °C SC (µs/cm) 0.50 8.9 22.7 607 0.50 5.3 22.4 542 0.75 6.0 22.1 520 0.75 5.0 22.3 531 1.00 5.7 22.1 516 9/11/18 0.00 10.6 21.1 331 0.00 10.7 21.1 331 0.25 10.5 21.1 331 0.25 10.7 21.0 331 0.50 10.5 21.1 331 0.50 10.4 21.0 331 0.75 10.5 21.1 330 0.75 10.3 20.9 331 0.95 10.6 20.9 333 9/26/18 0.00 8.8 15.7 147 0.00 8.9 15.2 149 0.25 8.8 15.6 147 0.25 8.8 15.4 148 0.50 8.8 15.5 147 0.50 8.7 15.4 148 0.75 8.5 15.3 148 1.00 8.5 15.3 148 Table A- 4. Continued: Data for sampling sites 4, 5 and 6 in the Swimming Pool Pond. SITE 4 SITE 5 SITE 6 Sampling date H (m) DO (mg/L) T °C SC (µs/cm) H (m) DO (mg/L) T °C SC (µs/cm) H (m) DO (mg/L) T °C SC (µs/cm) 5/16/18 0.00 10.3 19.1 2960 0.00 10.8 19.0 2973 0.00 9.7 19.6 2984 0.25 10.5 19.0 2957 0.25 10.8 19.0 3017 0.25 10.2 19.4 2964 0.50 9.5 19.0 2971 0.50 11.8 18.8 3053 0.50 11.8 19.1 3070 0.75 12.8 18.6 3116 0.75 15.3 18.9 3148 0.75 14.2 18.9 3161 1.00 14.8 17.8 3250 1.00 16.9 18.0 3267 1.25 18.3 17.1 4075 1.25 17.6 17.3 3507 5/30/18 0.00 4.4 24.4 2340 0.00 5.1 24.6 2420 0.00 4.3 25.0 2670 0.25 4.5 24.5 2310 0.25 5.0 24.8 2400 0.25 2.9 25.2 2680 0.50 4.7 24.5 2300 0.50 5.0 24.7 2410 0.50 3.0 25.1 2840 0.75 4.5 24.5 2300 0.75 4.3 24.7 2700 0.75 1.5 25.1 2830 1.00 3.2 24.4 2350 1.00 3.9 25.1 2770 0.85 0.53 25.1 2840 1.10 2.9 24.2 2350 1.25 1.3 24.9 2860 6/13/18 0.00 7.6 22.0 2230 0.00 6.9 22.3 2230 0.00 9.5 22.4 2220 0.25 7.4 22.1 2230 0.25 8.2 21.8 2220 0.25 8.9 22.0 2220 0.50 7.4 22.1 2230 0.50 7.9 21.8 2230 0.50 6.5 21.7 2220 0.75 8.0 22.0 2230 0.75 7.1 21.7 2240 0.73 4.3 21.5 2230 1.00 5.7 21.6 2230 1.00 7.0 21.6 2240 1.25 6.0 21.7 2240 6/27/18 0.00 4.3 23.3 953 0.00 5.9 23.2 960 0.00 5.5 23.6 1115 0.25 4.2 23.2 948 0.25 5.0 23.2 960 0.25 4.3 23.5 1154 0.50 4.0 23.1 950 0.50 4.3 23.1 956 0.50 2.2 23.4 1251 0.75 4.1 23.1 958 0.75 4.0 23.1 968 0.75 1.9 23.2 1250 1.00 3.8 23.0 967 1.00 2.8 23.2 954 1.25 1.0 23.0 932 1.25 1.1 23.3 1230 24 SITE 4 SITE 5 SITE 6 Sampling date H (m) DO (mg/L) T °C SC (µs/cm) H (m) DO (mg/L) T °C SC (µs/cm) H (m) DO (mg/L) T °C SC (µs/cm) 1.35 1.5 22.9 931 1.35 0.9 23.3 1100 7/11/18 0.00 6.51 26.4 726 0.00 5.3 26.5 726 0.00 5.84 26.4 725 0.25 6.15 26.4 724 0.25 5.6 26.5 727 0.25 5.21 26.6 723 0.50 4.94 26.4 730 0.50 5.6 26.6 725 0.50 3.67 26.5 723 0.75 3.87 26.4 734 0.75 4.7 26.5 725 0.75 4.76 26.6 724 1.00 2.86 26.3 733 1.00 3.1 26.5 727 1.25 1.95 26.1 733 1.13 2.6 26.5 729 7/26/18 0.00 6.4 23.3 552 0.00 5.8 23.4 560 0.00 5.6 23.5 553 0.25 6.3 23.4 552 0.25 5.7 23.5 560 0.25 5.4 23.5 554 0.50 6.3 23.4 552 0.50 5.7 23.6 569 0.50 5.5 23.5 552 0.75 6.3 23.4 552 0.75 5.6 23.6 569 0.75 5.4 23.5 553 1.00 6.3 23.4 552 1.00 5.7 23.6 559 1.25 5.7 23.4 552 1.15 5.5 23.6 559 8/8/18 0.00 11.8 27.2 385 0.00 13.2 26.2 384 0.00 12.7 26.7 393 0.25 12.4 25.3 375 0.25 13.4 25.3 384 0.25 11.7 25.4 392 0.50 11.2 24.9 375 0.50 11.3 24.8 388 0.50 10.5 25.0 391 0.75 5.9 24.4 369 0.75 9.3 24.5 396 0.75 7.8 24.6 395 1.00 4.1 24.2 371 1.00 4.7 24.3 402 1.25 0.2 23.8 462 1.25 0.5 24.0 426 8/22/18 0.00 9.7 22.8 628 0.00 8.3 23.1 677 0.00 9.8 23.2 701 0.25 9.1 22.9 621 0.25 7.6 22.8 665 0.25 6.7 22.8 625 0.50 8.9 22.7 550 0.50 6.2 22.6 637 0.50 4.2 22.7 628 0.75 5.8 22.4 554 0.75 5.6 22.4 621 1.00 5.0 22.0 497 1.00 4.9 22.3 608 1.20 0.2 22.3 639 9/11/18 0.00 10.8 21.1 331 0.00 9.9 21.1 332 0.00 9.8 21.4 332 0.25 10.8 21.0 331 0.25 10.2 21.1 331 0.25 9.6 21.2 333 0.50 10.8 21.0 331 0.50 10.3 21.0 331 0.50 9.4 21.2 332 0.75 10.5 20.9 331 0.75 8.7 21.0 332 1.00 9.3 20.6 333 1.00 7.9 20.8 334 1.20 6.6 20.4 336 1.20 6.9 20.6 337 9/26/18 0.00 8.8 15.4 147 0.00 8.8 15.3 148 0.00 9.0 15.2 149 0.25 8.7 15.5 147 0.25 8.8 15.4 148 0.25 9.0 15.4 148 0.50 8.7 15.5 147 0.50 8.8 15.4 148 0.50 8.9 15.4 148 0.75 8.5 15.5 147 0.75 8.3 15.4 148 0.75 8.9 15.4 149 1.00 8.3 15.4 147 1.00 8.2 15.4 148 1.25 8.1 15.4 148 1.25 8.2 15.5 148 25 Table A- 5. Dissolved oxygen (DO), temperature (T), and specific conductivity (SC) data for the Point of France Pond from May to September 2018. H is the depth of sampling in the water column. SITE 1 SITE 2 SITE 3 Sampling date H (m) DO (mg/L) T °C SC (µs/cm) H (m) DO (mg/L) T °C SC (µs/cm) H (m) DO (mg/L) T °C SC (µs/cm) 5/16/18 0.00 16.2 19.9 2826 0.00 16.1 19.7 2827 0.25 15.7 16.7 3250 0.25 17.1 17.8 3350 0.50 14.9 15.1 3501 0.50 14.8 14.5 3661 0.75 13.8 13.7 4037 0.75 12.1 13.5 3921 1.00 13.2 13.1 4875 1.00 15.8 13.5 5137 1.25 0.85 13.1 >10,000 1.25 0.93 13.1 10,000 1.50 0.19 11.4 >10,000 1.75 0.11 9.7 >10,000 1.95 0.08 8.4 >10,000 5/30/18 0.00 5.0 22.8 1535 0.00 5.01 22.8 1640 0.00 5.17 23.0 1591 0.25 4.9 22.9 1587 0.25 4.78 23.0 1659 0.25 5.1 23.0 1599 0.50 4.1 22.8 1554 0.50 4.36 23.0 1655 0.50 4.9 23.0 1625 0.75 3.0 22.8 1587 0.75 4.46 23.2 1800 0.75 4.2 23.3 1930 1.00 1.6 22.5 2000 1.00 3.16 23.0 1860 1.00 3.65 23.4 2057 1.25 0.97 22.3 2000 1.50 0.51 21.9 2520 1.75 0.06 21.4 3330 2.00 0.02 20.3 4300 6/13/18 0.00 2.5 22.8 1329 0.00 2.39 22.3 1334 0.00 2.0 22.2 1327 0.25 2.3 22.3 1326 0.25 2.29 22.2 1329 0.25 1.9 21.5 1317 0.50 2.0 21.6 1310 0.50 1.7 21.3 1320 0.50 1.8 21.2 1313 0.75 1.4 21.0 1300 0.75 1.56 20.9 1323 0.75 1.6 20.9 1311 1.00 1.2 20.7 1250 1.00 1.5 20.6 1306 1.00 1.9 20.7 1321 1.25 0.34 19.9 1145 1.12 1.43 20.6 1270 1.50 0.12 19.3 1110 6/27/18 0.00 5.1 23.1 365 0.00 4.86 23.1 361 0.00 4.9 23.4 362 0.25 5.1 22.7 365 0.25 5.23 22.7 365 0.25 4.9 22.8 367 0.50 3.8 22.4 368 0.50 4.36 22.4 365 0.50 4.0 22.4 366 0.75 3.4 22.2 369 0.75 3.91 22.3 360 0.75 3.5 22.3 364 1.00 2.8 21.6 326 1.00 1.83 22.0 358 1.00 2.4 21.9 332 1.25 2.5 21.4 317 1.50 2.2 20.9 299 7/11/18 0.00 7.6 25.4 265 0.00 8.7 25.8 263 0.00 8.8 25.9 265 0.25 7.6 25.5 265 0.25 8.2 25.7 264 0.25 8.4 25.7 264 0.50 6.7 25.6 265 0.50 8.1 25.7 265 0.50 8.4 25.7 264 0.75 5.4 25.4 272 0.75 3.9 25.4 273 0.75 5.9 25.6 264 1.00 3.6 25.1 291 1.00 2.3 25.2 1.00 2.8 25.4 366 7/26/18 0.00 7.6 22.3 251 0.00 7.2 22.8 249 0.00 6.8 23.0 257 0.25 7.5 22.6 249 0.25 7.1 22.9 249 0.25 6.8 23.0 250 0.50 7.4 22.7 249 0.50 7.0 22.9 249 0.50 6.9 23.0 250 26 SITE 1 SITE 2 SITE 3 Sampling date H (m) DO (mg/L) T °C SC (µs/cm) H (m) DO (mg/L) T °C SC (µs/cm) H (m) DO (mg/L) T °C SC (µs/cm) 0.75 7.3 22.8 249 0.75 7.0 22.9 249 0.75 6.7 23.0 250 1.00 7.2 22.9 249 1.00 7.0 22.9 249 1.00 6.7 23.0 249 1.25 6.4 22.9 250 1.25 6.87 23.0 249 1.50 4.73 22.9 251 8/9/18 0.00 11.2 25.2 215 0.00 11.7 25.3 214 0.00 12.2 25.6 214 0.25 11.7 25.3 217 0.25 11.4 25.2 214 0.25 12.2 25.2 214 0.50 10.6 25.2 221 0.50 10.2 25.2 214 0.50 10.3 24.9 216 0.75 4.86 24.3 260 0.75 5.7 24.1 239 0.70 9.1 24.9 217 1.00 2.8 23.6 246 8/22/18 0.00 7.5 23.3 298 0.00 8.6 23.4 292 0.00 8.3 24.1 295 0.25 7.0 22.6 296 0.25 7.2 22.7 292 0.25 7.1 22.7 291 0.50 5.5 22.2 295 0.50 5.7 22.3 293 0.50 7.1 22.6 291 0.75 4.6 22.1 295 0.75 5.3 22.2 293 1.00 4.1 22.1 299 0.95 4.9 22.1 294 1.25 3.8 22.1 302 1.50 3.6 22.0 299 1.75 3.5 22.0 297 2.00 0.14 22.0 330 9/11/18 0.00 9.8 21.0 188 0.00 9.7 20.4 187 0.00 10.4 21.1 183 0.25 9.6 20.6 187 0.25 9.7 20.4 187 0.25 10.5 20.8 183 0.50 9.4 20.1 187 0.50 9.5 20.4 187 0.50 10.1 20.5 182 0.75 8.8 20.1 192 0.75 9.0 20.3 186 1.00 7.4 19.8 200 1.00 7.1 20.1 187 1.25 6.5 19.7 208 9/26/18 0.00 5.0 15.2 101 0.00 5.0 15.1 101 0.00 5.2 15.1 100 0.25 4.9 15.2 101 0.25 5.0 15.1 101 0.25 5.1 15.2 100 0.50 4.9 15.2 101 0.50 5.0 15.1 101 0.50 5.1 15.2 100 0.75 4.8 15.2 101 0.75 4.9 15.1 101 0.75 5.0 15.2 100 1.00 4.5 15.2 101 0.90 4.8 15.1 102 1.25 4.4 15.2 101 1.50 4.3 15.2 102 1.75 4.3 15.2 102 Table A- 6. Continued: Data for sampling sites 4, 5 and 6 in the Point of France pond. SITE 4 SITE 5 SITE 6 Sampling date H (m) DO (mg/L) T °C SC (µs/cm) H (m) DO (mg/L) T °C SC (µs/cm) H (m) DO (mg/L) T °C SC (µs/cm) 5/16/18 0.00 17.7 19.3 2806 0.25 18.6 18.1 3275 0.50 20.6 15.3 3910 0.75 15.6 14.0 4278 5/30/18 0.00 5.22 22.9 1609 0.00 6.6 23.1 1813 0.00 5.25 23.2 1724 27 SITE 4 SITE 5 SITE 6 Sampling date H (m) DO (mg/L) T °C SC (µs/cm) H (m) DO (mg/L) T °C SC (µs/cm) H (m) DO (mg/L) T °C SC (µs/cm) 0.25 5.12 22.9 1594 0.25 5.6 23.3 1808 0.25 5.09 23.3 1729 0.50 4.87 22.9 1588 0.50 5.4 23.3 1798 0.50 5.14 23.3 1732 0.75 4.64 22.9 1594 0.75 4.7 23.3 1796 0.75 4.56 23.3 1786 1.00 3.86 23.3 1830 6/13/18 0.00 2.19 22.6 1330 0.00 1.8 22.4 1350 0.00 1.88 23.0 1330 0.25 2.08 22.7 1327 0.25 1.6 21.7 1331 0.25 1.1 21.7 1316 0.50 2.11 22.5 1325 0.50 1.4 21.3 1331 0.50 1.45 21.3 1325 0.75 1.96 21.3 1310 0.75 1.94 21.0 1320 6/27/18 0.00 5.18 22.9 362 0.00 4.5 23.5 366 0.00 4.77 23.5 366 0.25 4.48 22.6 363 0.25 3.5 22.8 366 0.25 2.53 22.7 367 0.50 4.02 22.4 360 0.50 2.4 22.5 367 0.50 2.53 22.4 357 0.75 2.89 22.2 357 0.75 0.1 22.3 354 0.75 1.62 22.1 332 0.90 2.24 22.1 357 7/11/18 0.00 8.0 26.3 266 0.00 10.4 26.5 262 0.00 10.0 26.8 262 0.25 8.0 25.9 266 0.25 9.9 26.4 261 0.25 10.1 26.7 262 0.50 7.1 25.7 265 0.50 9.8 26.3 261 0.50 9.5 26.5 262 0.75 3.9 25.4 273 0.65 8.8 26.2 261 0.75 6.7 25.8 262 1.00 3.7 25.3 300 1.00 5.52 25.6 495 7/26/18 0.00 7.4 22.9 250 0.00 7.6 23.0 248 0.00 8.1 23.2 247 0.25 7.5 23.0 250 0.25 7.5 23.1 248 0.25 6.8 23.1 248 0.50 7.5 23.0 249 0.50 7.5 23.1 248 0.50 6.7 23.1 248 0.75 7.4 22.9 249 0.65 7.4 23.1 247 0.75 6.3 23.0 248 8/9/18 0.00 11.9 25.5 214 0.00 10.6 25.9 212 0.00 11.1 26.7 213 0.25 10.8 25.4 213 0.25 14.2 25.5 214 0.25 13.4 25.7 215 0.50 11.1 25.2 216 0.50 13.8 25.2 214 0.50 14.3 25.4 215 0.75 9.1 24.3 220 0.75 10.7 24.6 218 0.70 10.5 25.0 367 1.00 1.5 23.7 228 8/22/18 0.00 9.6 23.5 292 0.00 9.7 23.4 291 0.25 9.3 22.9 290 0.25 9.6 22.7 289 0.50 8.1 22.3 290 0.50 8.8 22.4 289 0.75 5.9 22.1 291 0.75 6.0 22.0 291 0.76 5.3 22.0 292 1.00 5.4 22.0 292 9/11/18 0.00 10.3 21.0 186 0.00 10.3 21.5 184 0.25 10.3 20.9 185 0.25 10.2 21.2 183 0.50 10.3 20.7 184 0.50 10.3 21.1 183 0.75 10.3 20.5 183.9 0.75 10.2 20.7 183 1.00 9.7 20.3 182.9 1.00 8.3 20.2 184 9/26/18 0.00 5.2 15.1 101 0.00 5.2 15.2 101 0.25 5.1 15.1 101 0.25 4.9 15.1 100 0.50 5.0 15.1 101 0.50 4.9 15.1 101 0.75 5.0 15.1 101 0.75 4.8 15.1 101 1.00 4.3 15.1 101 1.00 4.4 15.1 101 Appendix C Summary of Hydraulic Modeling Analysis for Rosland Park Stormwater Treatment BMP Barr Engineering Co. 4300 MarketPointe Drive, Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55435 952.832.2600 www.barr.com Technical Memorandum To: Project File From: Katie Turpin-Nagel and Janna Kieffer Subject: Rosland Park Proposed Filtration BMP- Summary of Hydraulic Analysis Date: June 10, 2020 Project: 23271725.01 The proposed stormwater Best Management Practice (BMP) in Rosland Park is an above-ground filtration vault that will treat water from Swimming Pool Pond prior to discharge to North Lake Cornelia. Because the filtration vault is above ground and there is minimal drop in elevation between Swimming Pool Pond and North Cornelia, use of a pump is necessary to get water from Swimming Pool Pond into the above- ground filtration vault. After passing through the filtration system, treated water would be conveyed to Lake Cornelia through existing stormwater infrastructure. Operation of the proposed pump for the filtration vault at Rosland Park will be dependent on water levels in Swimming Pool Pond; the pump will operate when water levels are higher than or slightly below the control elevation. The depth of pumped drawdown below the control elevation of Swimming Pool Pond (and Lake Otto, north of Highway 62 and connected to Swimming Pool Pond via two 60-inch culverts) was given much consideration as part of this feasibility and preliminary design analysis, with the goal of balancing the maximization of water pumped to the filtration system with minimizing impacts of pumping on riparian land owners adjacent to Swimming Pool Pond and Lake Otto. A hydraulic modeling analysis was conducted to help determine how much water would be treated under various pumping scenarios and climatic conditions and what impacts the pumping scenarios would have on water levels. Methodology and results of the hydraulic modeling analysis are summarized in this memo. Discussion of Model Set-up The XP-SWMM hydrology and hydraulics modeling software was used to assess the impacts of pumping based on various drawdown depths from the normal water level (NWL) of Swimming Pool Pond and upstream Lake Otto. A long-term continuous simulation was conducted because it allows for evaluation of water fluctuations under a variety of climatic conditions. For the continuous modeling analysis, the City of Edina’s existing XPSWMM model was simplified for the Lake Cornelia watershed, and then run for several pumping scenarios using 35-years of 15-minute precipitation data. The pumping scenarios analyzed included: 1) Pump shuts off 6 inches below the NWL, lowering Swimming Pool Pond and Lake Otto 2) Isolating Lake Otto-- Pump shuts off 6 inches below the NWL, lowering only Swimming Pool Pond 3) Pump shuts off 3.6 inches below the NWL, lowering Swimming Pool Pond and Lake Otto Date: June 10, 2020 Page: 2 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271725 Lake Cornelia WQ Improvements\_01 Lake Cornelia WQ Improvement Feasibility\WorkFiles\Feasibility Study Report\Appendices\RoslandParkBMP_HydraulicsMemo_v3ChangesAccepted.docx All of the modeled scenarios assumed a design pumping rate of 1.0 cfs that would run 12 hours per day during April 15 through November 15. The model results were used to assess the volume of water that could be treated each year on average by the filtration vault. Table 1 summarizes the results for each modeled scenario. Table 1. Summary of amount of water treated and impacts to Lake Otto water levels under evaluated pumping scenarios Scenario Average Annual Pumped Volume (ac-ft)1 Range Annual Pumped Volume (ac-ft)1 % of Discharge from Swimming Pool Pond Treated3 Average days/treatment period1 Lake Otto >3 inches below existing NWL Average days/treatment period1 Lake Otto >6 inches below existing NWL 1 Pump shuts off 6 inches below the NWL, lowering Swimming Pool Pond and Lake Otto 125 71 - 163 58% 122 (57%) 62 (29%) 2 Isolating Lake Otto-- Pump shuts off 6 inches below the NWL, lowering only Swimming Pool Pond 102 60 - 130 49% 25 2 (12% 2) 5 2 (3% 2) 3 Pump shuts off 3.6 inches below the NWL, lowering Swimming Pool Pond and Lake Otto 108 61 - 143 52% 108 (50%) 13 (6%) 1 Treatment season is April 15 through November 15. 2 Reflects existing conditions in Lake Otto 3 % of discharge based on treatment period of April 15 through November 15 The continuous simulation hydraulic model was also used to determine how often lake levels in Lake Otto would be below the normal water level by greater than 3 inches (0.25 feet) and greater than 6 inches (0.5 feet). Figures 1 and 2 show the average percentage of days during the treatment period that water levels would be 3 inches or more below the normal water level and 6 inches or more below the normal water level, as compared with existing conditions. Date: June 10, 2020 Page: 3 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271725 Lake Cornelia WQ Improvements\_01 Lake Cornelia WQ Improvement Feasibility\WorkFiles\Feasibility Study Report\Appendices\RoslandParkBMP_HydraulicsMemo_v3ChangesAccepted.docx Figure 1. Average percent of days water level in Lake Otto is 3 inches or more below the NWL Figure 2. Average percent of days water level in Lake Otto is 6 inches or more below the NWL Date: June 10, 2020 Page: 4 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271725 Lake Cornelia WQ Improvements\_01 Lake Cornelia WQ Improvement Feasibility\WorkFiles\Feasibility Study Report\Appendices\RoslandParkBMP_HydraulicsMemo_v3ChangesAccepted.docx Discussion of Modeling Results Scenario 1, pumping until the water level in Swimming Pool Pond is 6 inches below the NWL, results in an average annual pumped/treated volume of 125 acre-feet, which represents approximately 58% of the discharge from Swimming Pool Pond to North Cornelia during the treatment period (April 15 – November 15). As shown in Figures 1 and 2, this pumping scenario does result in an increased number of days that the water level in Lake Otto is below the normal water level. On average, under Pumping Scenario 1, water levels would be 3 inches or more below the existing NWL approximately 57% of the days during the treatment period (April 15 through November 15), as compared to 12% under existing conditions. Water levels would be 6 inches or more below the NWL approximately 29% of the days during the treatment period, on average, as compared with 3% under existing conditions. Scenario 2, isolating Lake Otto and pumping until Swimming Pool Pond is 6 inches below the NWL, results in an average annual treatment volume of 102 acre-feet (approximately 23 acre-feet less than the Scenario 1). This treated volume represents approximately 49% of the flow from Swimming Pool Pond to North Cornelia during the treatment period (April 15 – November 15). Isolating Lake Otto from Swimming Pool Pond to prevent lowering of water levels due to pumping would require a weir or alternate control structure be installed at the Lake Otto outlet. A site investigation found that construction of a weir at the Lake Otto outlet or inlet to Swimming Pool Pond would be challenging due to steep slopes, the depth of the fully-submerged pipes, and the length of weir that would need to be constructed to cross two 60-inch diameter storm sewer pipes. The considerable construction constraints and associated costs make this option undesirable. A third scenario was analyzed to attempt to balance the advantages of Scenarios 1 and 2. The goal of Scenario 3 was to minimize the number of days that Lake Otto has reduced water surface elevations, while maximizing the amount of water treated from Swimming Pool Pond. In Scenario 3, water is pumped until the water level in Swimming Pool Pond is 3.6 inches (0.3 feet) below the NWL. This scenario results in an average annual treatment volume of 108 acre-feet, approximately 52% of the discharge volume from Swimming Pool Pond to North Cornelia during the treatment period (April 15 – November 15). Reducing the depth of pumping from 6 inches to 3.6 inches results in reduced water level impacts to Lake Otto residents (see Figures 1 and 2). On average, the number of days during the treatment period that water levels would be 3 inches or more below the NWL is approximately 50%, in comparison with 57% under Scenario 1. The average number of days during the treatment period that water levels would be 6 inches or more below the NWL is approximately 6%, which is significantly lower than under Scenario 1 (29%) and only slightly higher than under existing conditions (3%). Scenario 3, turning the pump off when the water level in Swimming Pool Pond drops 3.6 inches below the normal water level, balances the desire to pump/treat a substantial portion of the flow from Swimming Pool Pond to Lake Cornelia while minimizing impacts to water levels for riparian land owners adjacent to Swimming Pool Pond and Lake Otto. A benefit of periodic lower water levels is reduced flood risk for adjacent properties. Appendix D Opinions of Probable Cost PREPARED BY: BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY SHEET: 1 OF 2 BY:KAL DATE:5/15/2020 CHECKED BY: JMK2 DATE: 5/15/2020 ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE PROJECT COST APPROVED BY:DATE: PROJECT:2019 Rosland Park Feasibility Design ISSUED:DATE: LOCATION:Nine Mile Creek Watershed District ISSUED:DATE: PROJECT #:23/27-1725.01 ISSUED:DATE: OPINION OF COST - SUMMARY ISSUED:DATE: Engineer's Opinion of Probable Project Cost Rosland Park Above Ground Filter Feasibility Design Cat.ESTIMATED No.ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT COST ITEM COST NOTES A Mobilization/Demobilization (10%)LS 1 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 B Traffic Control LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 C Inlet Protection Each 4 $250.00 $1,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 D Orange Construction Fencing LF 500 $5.00 $2,500.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 E Silt Fence LF 250 $4.00 $1,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 F Street Sweeping HR 20 $175.00 $3,500.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 G Utility Relocation LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 H Clearing and Grubbing LS 1.0 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 I Excavation for Vault & Placement as Fill on site CY 150 $20.00 $3,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 J 5 HP Pump, MH structure, electrical panel, and controls Each 1 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 K Power supply for pump LF 350 $25.00 $8,750.00 L Aeration MH with internal pipes - 72" dia., 8' deep LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 M Area Drains,pipe and river rock for filter discharge (Nyloplast)Each 3 $2,000.00 $6,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 N Shallow Area Drain downstream of Area Drains (Nyloplast)Each 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 O SPP Pump Intake Floating Island skimmer (Biohaven)SF 250 $70.00 $17,500.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 P 12" Flexible Pump Intake Pipe in SPP LF 40 $100.00 $4,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 Q 12" Pump Intake pipe under road LF 40 $40.00 $1,600.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 R Pump Discharge pipe to aertion MH LF 100 $35.00 $3,500.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 S 12" Pipe from Aeration MH to Flow Distribution weir LF 20 $35.00 $700.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 T Flow spreader Weir/pipes into Vault LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 U Pipe to Ex CB - 12" PVC LF 180 $30.00 $5,400.00 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 V Connect to Existing CB Each 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 W 3/4" Crushed Rock with Geotextile under vault ( 2 ft thick)CY 150 $50.00 $7,500.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 X Reinforced Concrete - Slab (1200sf x 8")CY 30 $1,000.00 $30,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 Y Reinforced Concrete - 6" Walls (6' deep vault)CY 24 $1,000.00 $24,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 Z Reinforced Concrete - Footing CY 20 $1,000.00 $20,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 AA Vault Grate cover-FRP and cross supports SF 1,200 $40.00 $48,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 BB Vault Railing LF 100 $150.00 $15,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 CC 6" CPEP underdrain and outlet pipe for Filter Cell Each 3 $2,000.00 $6,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 DD Drainage layer under filter- 6" depth Granular Filter Aggregate CY 20 $80.00 $1,600.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 EE Cell 1-CC17 Filter media (2 ft depth) CY 27 $100.00 $2,700.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 FF Cell 2-CC17 and Iron Filter media (2 ft depth) CY 27 $120.00 $3,240.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 GG Cell 3-Spent Lime (3 ft depth)CY 40 $100.00 $4,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 HH Concrete Wall Facing (105' x 5')SF 525 $50.00 $26,250.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 II Curb and Gutter Installation LF 100 $50.00 $5,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 JJ Remove and replace bituminous and agg base SY 160 $60.00 $9,600.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 KK Pond Shoreline Restoration LS 1.0 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 LL Turf Re-Establishment (Restoration)SY 200 $5.00 $1,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 MM Erosion Control Blanket SY 200 $4.00 $800.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 $439,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 $132,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 $172,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 $743,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 -15%$632,000.00 5,8 20%$892,000.00 5,8ESTIMATED ACCURACY RANGE ESTIMATED TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY (30%) ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (30%) P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271725 Lake Cornelia WQ Improvements\_01 Lake Cornelia WQ Improvement Feasibility\WorkFiles\2019 BMP Conceptual Design\Cost Estimate\AboveGroundFilter_Cornelia_KAL_KJN2May2020_clean.xlsx 1 NN Public Art LS 1 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 $100,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6,8 Notes 6 Estimated costs are for construction and do not include maintenance, monitoring, or additional tasks following construction. 8 Estimated costs are reported to nearest thousand dollars. 1 Limited design work completed (feasibility level) 2 Quantities Based on Design Work Completed. 3 Unit Prices Based on Information Available at This Time. 4 Minimal Soil and Field Investigations Completed. 5 This Design Level (Class 3, 10 - 40% design completion per ASTM E 2516-116) cost estimate is based on screening/conceptual discussion. Costs will change with further design. Time value-of-money escalation costs are not included. A construction schedule is not available at this time. Contingency is an allowance for the net sum of costs that will be in the Final Total Project Cost at the time of the completion of design, but are not included at this level of project definition. The estimated accuracy range for the Total Project Construction Cost as the project is defined is -15% to +20%. The accuracy range is based on professional judgement considering the level of design completed, the complexity of the project and the uncertainties in the project as scoped. The contingency and the accuracy range are not intended to include costs for future scope changes that are not part of the project as currently scoped or costs for risk contingency. Operation and maintenance costs are not included. 7 Furnish and Install pipe cost per linear foot includes all trenching, bedding, backfilling, compaction, and disposal of excess materials ADDITIONAL ITEMS SUBTOTAL P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271725 Lake Cornelia WQ Improvements\_01 Lake Cornelia WQ Improvement Feasibility\WorkFiles\2019 BMP Conceptual Design\Cost Estimate\AboveGroundFilter_Cornelia_KAL_KJN2May2020_clean.xlsx 2 PREPARED BY: BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY SHEET: 1 OF CREATED BY:KJN2 DATE:3/18/2020 ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE PROJECT COST CHECKED BY: KAL DATE: 6/1/2020 PROJECT:Lake Edina Retrofit BMPs - Cornelia Elementary APPROVED BY: JMK2 DATE: 6/1/2020 LOCATION:City of Edina ISSUED:DATE: PROJECT #:23271725.01 ISSUED:DATE: ISSUED:DATE: Three Rainwater Gardens Cat.ESTIMATED No.ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT COST ITEM COST NOTES A Mobilization LS 1 $18,000 $18,000 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 B Temporary Erosion Control LS 1 $5,000 $5,000 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 C Tree Removal EA 16 $1,000 $16,000 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 D Remove and Dispose of Sewer Pipe LF 24 $30 $720 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 E Remove and Dispose of Storm Structures EA 2 $750 $1,500 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 F Sawcut Pavement LF 100 $10 $1,000 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 G Remove and Dispose Pavement SY 70 $5 $350 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 H 48" Diameter RC Drainage Structure, Complete EA 2 $4,000 $8,000 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 I Storm diversion structure (manhole + weir)EA 1 $15,000 $15,000 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 J Storm sewer pipe (RCP)LF 175 $115 $20,125 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 K Storm sewer FES (RCP)EA 1 $600 $600 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 L Tie-In to Existing Storm Structure EA 1 $2,000 $2,000 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 M Replace Pavement SY 70 $35 $2,450 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 N Splashblock Assemblies EA 4 $1,400 $5,600 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 O Rain Garden(s)SF 6,669 $15 $100,035 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $196,000 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,9 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY (30%)$59,000 1,5,9 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $255,000 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,9 PLANNING, ENGINEERING & DESIGN (30%)$77,000 1,2,3,4,5,9 ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COST $332,000 1,2,3,4,5,7,11 -30%$233,000 5,7,11 50%$498,000 5,7,11 9 Estimate costs are reported to nearest thousand dollars. 5 This concept-level (Class 5, 1-15% design completion per ASTM E 2516-11) cost estimate is based on feasibility-level designs, alignments, quantities and unit prices. Costs will change with further design. Time value-of-money escalation costs are not included. A construction schedule is not available at this time. Contingency is an allowance for the net sum of costs that will be in the Final Total Project Cost at the time of the completion of design, but are not included at this level of project definition. The estimated accuracy range for the Total Project Cost as the project is defined is -30% to +50%. The accuracy range is based on professional judgement considering the level of design completed, the complexity of the project and the uncertainties in the project as scoped. The contingency and the accuracy range are not intended to include costs for future scope changes that are not part of the project as currently scoped or costs for risk contingency. Operation and Maintenance costs are not included. 7 Estimate costs are to design, construct, and permit each alternative. The estimated costs do not include maintenance, monitoring or additional tasks following constuction. 8 Estimate costs are to install a rainwater garden, including subsurface removals, and installation of planting soil, plants, and shrubs. OPINION OF COST - SUMMARY Lake Edina Retrofit BMPs - Cornelia Elementary Engineer's Opinion of Probable Project Cost 6 Estimate assumes that projects will not be located on contaminated soil. 4 Limited Soil Boring and Field Investigation Information Available. Notes 1 Limited Design Work Completed (1-15%). 2 Quantities Based on Design Work Completed. ESTIMATED ACCURACY RANGE 3 Unit Prices Based on Information Available at This Time. P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271725 Lake Cornelia WQ Improvements\_01 Lake Cornelia WQ Improvement Feasibility\WorkFiles\Lake Edina Concept BMPs\Cost Estimate\Copy of Engineers Opinion of Probable Cost_LakeEdinaBMPs_KAL.xlsx School RWGs PREPARED BY: BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY SHEET: 1 OF CREATED BY:KJN2 DATE:3/18/2020 ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE PROJECT COST CHECKED BY: KAL DATE: 6/1/2020 PROJECT:Lake Edina Retrofit BMPs - Lynmar Basin APPROVED BY: JMK2 DATE: 6/1/2020 LOCATION:City of Edina ISSUED:DATE: PROJECT #:23271725.01 ISSUED:DATE: ISSUED:DATE: Infiltration Basin Cat.ESTIMATED No.ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT COST ITEM COST NOTES A Mobilization LS 1 $28,000 $28,000 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 B Temporary Erosion Control LS 1 $5,000 $5,000 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 D Tree Removal EA 30 $700 $21,000 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 E Install cast-in-place weir in existing FES LS 1 $6,000 $6,000 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 M Infiltration Basin SF 24,341 $10 $243,410 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $303,0001,2,3,4,5,6,7,9 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY (30%)$91,0001,5,9 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $394,0001,2,3,4,5,6,7,9 PLANNING, ENGINEERING & DESIGN (30%)$118,0001,2,3,4,5,9 ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COST $512,0001,2,3,4,5,7,11 -30%$359,000 5,7,11 50%$768,000 5,7,11 9 Estimate costs are reported to nearest thousand dollars. ESTIMATED ACCURACY RANGE Notes 1 Limited Design Work Completed (1-15%). 2 Quantities Based on Design Work Completed. 3 Unit Prices Based on Information Available at This Time. 4 Limited Soil Boring and Field Investigation Information Available. 5 This concept-level (Class 5, 1-15% design completion per ASTM E 2516-11) cost estimate is based on feasibility-level designs, alignments, quantities and unit prices. Costs will change with further design. Time value-of-money escalation costs are not included. A construction schedule is not available at this time. Contingency is an allowance for the net sum of costs that will be in the Final Total Project Cost at the time of the completion of design, but are not included at this level of project definition. The estimated accuracy range for the Total Project Cost as the project is defined is -30% to +50%. The accuracy range is based on professional judgement considering the level of design completed, the complexity of the project and the uncertainties in the project as scoped. The contingency and the accuracy range are not intended to include costs for future scope changes that are not part of the project as currently scoped or costs for risk contingency. Operation and Maintenance costs are not included. 6 Estimate assumes that projects will not be located on contaminated soil. 7 Estimate costs are to design, construct, and permit each alternative. The estimated costs do not include maintenance, monitoring or additional tasks following constuction. 8 Estimate costs are to install a rainwater garden, including subsurface removals, and installation of planting soil, plants, and shrubs. Lake Edina Retrofit BMPs - Lynmar Basin OPINION OF COST - SUMMARY Engineer's Opinion of Probable Project Cost P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271725 Lake Cornelia WQ Improvements\_01 Lake Cornelia WQ Improvement Feasibility\WorkFiles\Lake Edina Concept BMPs\Cost Estimate\Copy of Engineers Opinion of Probable Cost_LakeEdinaBMPs_KAL.xlsx Lynmar Basin Lake Cornelia Curly-leaf Pondweed Herbicide Treatment (Endothall) Cost Estimate Item Description Unit Estimated Quantity Unit Cost Cost Per Year Prepare Bids/Specs/Form of Agreement LS 1 $3,000 $3,000 Treatment design LS 1 $2,000 $2,000 MnDNR Permitting LS 1 $1,000 $1,000 Temperature Measurements LS 1 $3,000 $3,000 Herbicide Residue Monitoring LS 1 $2,300 $2,300 Data Processing/Reporting LS 1 $2,000 $2,000 Barr costs for Macrophyte surveys (contract preparation, coordination, and data QA) LS 2 $300 $600 Subcontractor Cost of Macrophyte Surveys and Analyses LS 2 $1,300 $2,600 Subcontractor Cost of Endothall Treatment Gallons 114 $75 $8,540 $3,000 $28,100 Range (-15%)$24,000 $34,000 $24,000 to $34,000 Assumptions: Includes one pre-treatment and post-treatment plant survey completed by Endangered Resource Services, Assumes the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District prepares Bids/Specs and conducts all coordination, including monitoring and reporting that may be required as part of permitting (e.g., temperature monitoring, herbicide residual monitoring, post-treatment aquatic plant survey) and contracting (herbicide applicator and aquatic plant survey subcontractor) Assumes NMCWD engineer will process data and prepare a memo summarizing treatment results Assumes water quality monitoring, if required, is completed by the NMCWD as a part of the District lake monitoring program or by CAMP and cost is not included in this program. Assumes UPL will provide free analyses of endothall residue samples following treatment. Contingency (10%) Range (+20%) Total Includes treatment of North and South Cornelia Total PREPARED BY: BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY SHEET: 1 OF CREATED BY:JAH DATE:5/20/2020 ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE PROJECT COST CHECKED BY: JMK2 DATE: 6/1/2020 PROJECT:Lake Cornelia Drawdown APPROVED BY:DATE: LOCATION:City of Edina ISSUED:DATE: PROJECT #:23271725.01 ISSUED:DATE: ISSUED:DATE: Cat.ESTIMATED No.ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT COST ITEM COST NOTES A Mobilization/demobilization LS 1 $5,000 $5,000 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 B Pump set-up, rental, and removal (3,000 gpm pump)LS 3 $169,100 $507,300 C Daily servicing (including refueling and maintenance) during initial 30-day drawdown period1 LS 3 $45,800 $137,400 D Periodic servicing8 (including refueling and maintenance) to maintain drawdown) LS 3 $129,600 $388,800 E Site Restoration LS 3 $2,500 $7,500 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 F HDPEP Inlet and Outlet Pipes for All Three Pipes (2,400 Feet Total) LF 2,400 $15 $36,000 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $1,082,0001,2,3,4,5,6,7,9 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY (30%)$325,0001,5,9 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $1,407,0001,2,3,4,5,6,7,9 PLANNING, ENGINEERING & DESIGN (30%)$422,0001,2,3,4,5,9 ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,829,0001,2,3,4,5,7,11 -30%$1,281,000 5,7,11 50%$2,744,000 5,7,11 4 Limited Soil Boring and Field Investigation Information Available. 5 This concept-level (Class 5, 1-15% design completion per ASTM E 2516-11) cost estimate is based on feasibility-level designs, alignments, quantities and unit prices. Costs will change with further design. Time value-of-money escalation costs are not included. A construction schedule is not available at this time. Contingency is an allowance for the net sum of costs that will be in the Final Total Project Cost at the time of the completion of design, but are not included at this level of project definition. The estimated accuracy range for the Total Project Cost as the project is defined is -30% to +50%. The accuracy range is based on professional judgement considering the level of design completed, the complexity of the project and the uncertainties in the project as scoped. The contingency and the accuracy range are not intended to include costs for future scope changes that are not part of the project as currently scoped or costs for risk contingency. Operation and Maintenance costs are not included. 6 Estimate assumes that projects will not be located on contaminated soil. 7 Estimated costs are to design, construct, and permit each alternative. The estimated costs do not include maintenance, monitoring or additional tasks following constuction. 8 Cost estimate assumes one month of continuous pumping (August 15 through September 15) followed by 6.5 months of intermittent pumping (September 15 through March 1) to keep the lake drawn down. The cost estimate assumes pumping 50% of the time during the intermittent period but this could vary widely depending on precipitation and climate conditions. 9 Estimate costs are reported to nearest thousand dollars. ESTIMATED ACCURACY RANGE Notes 1 Limited Design Work Completed (1-15%). 2 Quantities Based on Design Work Completed. 3 Unit Prices Based on Information Available at This Time. OPINION OF COST - SUMMARY Engineer's Opinion of Probable Project Cost Lake Cornelia Drawdown P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271725 Lake Cornelia WQ Improvements\_01 Lake Cornelia WQ Improvement Feasibility\WorkFiles\CLP Management\drawdown\Cost Estimates\Drawdown Cost Estimate_20200520_JMK2Rev.xlsx Detailed Cost for report PREPARED BY: BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY SHEET: 1 OF 2 BY:KMP DATE:5/28/2020 CHECKED BY: JMK2 DATE: 6/1/2020 ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE PROJECT COST APPROVED BY:DATE: PROJECT:Lake Cornelia Aeration System ISSUED:DATE: LOCATION:Nine Mile Creek Watershed District ISSUED:DATE: PROJECT #:23/27-1725.01 ISSUED:DATE: SUMMARY OF MORE DETAILED VERSION ISSUED:DATE: Engineer's Opinion of Probable Project Cost Lake Cornelia Aeration System ITEM ESTIMATED #ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT COST ITEM COST NOTES Mobilization/Demobilization (10%)LS 1 $9,665 $9,664.50 A Inlet Protection Each 2 $250 $500 B Orange Construction Fencing LF 100 $5 $500 C Silt Fence LF 100 $4 $400 D Street Sweeping HR 20 $175 $3,500 E Electrical Installation (110V)LS 1 $10,000 $10,000 F Clearing and Grubbing LS 1.0 $1,000 $1,000 Safety, Erosion Control, and Site Prep $15,900.00 G Pump (Aquaculture Pump Rated 60 gpm/ 60 ft Head)Each 1 $2,450 $2,450 H Topz Ulta (10 lpm) Oxygen Supply Each 1 $4,375 $4,375 I Flow Control Unit (Alicat)Each 1 $2,550 $2,550 J Contact Chamber (24" Base Speece Cone or Equivalent)Each 1 $2,570 $2,570 K Environmental Control (Heater, Dehumidifier)Each 1 $2,000 $2,000 L Piping Each 1 $15,000 $15,000 M Building and Distribution System Prep Each 1 $10,000 $10,000 N Building (6'x6' Precast Concrete)Each 1 $12,500 $12,500 O System Assembly, In-Lake Piping Assembly and Deploy Each 1 $25,000 $25,000 Aeration System - Complete $76,445.00 P Lake Shoreline Restoration Each 1.0 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 Q Turf Re-Establishment (Restoration)SY 200 $5.00 $1,000.00 R Erosion Control Blanket SY 200 $4.00 $800.00 Site Restoration $4,300.00 Construction Contingency (30%)$31,892.85 $138,202.35 Gantzer Water Design and Commissioning Support1 $22,000.00 $41,460.71 $202,000.00 -15%$172,000.00 20%$243,000.00 1 Gantzer Water design and commissioning support includes engineering and design support, start-up testing, O&M manual and training, and two years of start-up support. CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (30%) ESTIMATED TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATED ACCURACY RANGE Appendix E Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations 206.999.1878 / 163 Rainbow Dr., #6331, Livingston, TX 77399 Paul.Gantzer@gmail.com / www.gantzerwater.com Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations PREPARED FOR: Keith Pilgrim (Barr Engineering) PREPARED BY: Paul Gantzer DATE: April 21, 2020 Proposed Scope of Work: Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations The focus of this work was to identify the oxygen demand in North and South Lake Cornelia and then use those values to recommend an ice-preserving oxygen management strategy that can operate during winter to prevent fish kills. Five sets of water column profile data were provided from January 18 to March 18, 2019 that were collected at east and west locations on North and South Lake Cornelia. Additionally, two strings of dissolved oxygen (DO) probes were deployed in each basin and collected data hourly between January 14 and April 14, 2020. Probes were positioned 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 feet above the bottom. Following review and analysis of the water quality data, four remediation strategies were evaluated, full-lift aeration, full-lift oxygenation, oxygen enhanced full-lift aeration, and side-stream saturation (SSS) oxygenation. In summary, it is recommended to deploy SSS systems in each basin. The following report summarizes details supporting this recommendation. Data Analysis and DO Demand A topographical map was provided with the water column profiles collected during winter 2019. The topo was imported into AutoCadLT to scale and the contours were traced to create an approximate volume table for each basin. Both North and South Lakes were divided into two sub basins representing east and west. The division is shown as a heavy black line on the topographic map (Figure 1). For this study, the surface contours were excluded because they represent the area and volume covered with the ice. The estimated volumes of interest were summarized in Table 1. 2 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations Figure 3: Topographic map of North and South Lake Cornelia showing location of water column profiles and remote sensor deployment labeled as “North actual install” and “South Install”. Table 1: Summary of lake and corresponding basin volumes. Both water column profiles and remote data were used to estimate DO depletion rates. An example of the water column profiles collected during February 2019, which were also used to determine DO depletion rates are shown in Figures 2 and 3 for North and South Lake Cornelia respectively. ft3 m3 East 377,666 10,694 West 415,737 11,772 793,403 22,467 East 795,730 22,533 West 740,052 20,956 1,535,782 43,488 North Total South VolumeLakeBasin Total 3 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations Although remote probes were deployed at four depths, only partial data sets were available for analysis. Bottom probes were believed to have sunken into the sediment. This is based on this depth recording 0 mg/L as soon as the probes were deployed and then reading ambient once the sensors were recovered. This meant that the other probes positions were approximately 6 inches below the original estimate. Data was therefore shifted downward to reflect this offset. For North, the remaining three probes collected data throughout the deployment (Figure 4 top). For South, only the two middle probes collected data (Figure 4 bottom). The top probe appeared to have been damaged in shipping for it did not have data beyond the test data point prior to shipping in December. All remote data were aggregated to consolidate the data to daily averages for analysis (Figure 5). Both lakes showed linear DO depletion in late January through early February, which is denoted by black lines on the aggregated data (Figure 5) and is summarized in Table 2. Review of the remote data revealed prolonged anoxic conditions in North and recovery in mid-February but then depleting again until spring ice melt occurred in South. The volume table was used to determine oxygen (mass) content for the various data sets. In summary DO depletion rates from water column profiles were calculated to be 20.4 (8.0 east, 12.4 west) and 17.5 (10.4 east, 7.1 west) kg/d for North and South Lake Cornelia respectively. Analysis of the remote data resulted in DO depletion rates to be 15.5 and 21.3 kg/d for North and South Lake Cornelia respectively. Although there are limitations in each data set, these values provide a baseline to establish and oxygen supplement strategy. Traditional oxygen management would consider the maximum depletion rate and then design a system to meet up to three times that demand throughout a determined time period, typically six months. This is done because of increased DO demand from oxygenation system operation coupled with increased DO demand throughout the summer as detritus enters the lower waters from settling organics growing throughout the summer. For winter oxygenation, the strategy is modified to sustain adequate DO long enough to reach ice melt in the spring. Based on this modification, the oxygenation system can be scaled back to prolong the onset of anoxia for one and half to two months compared to maintaining a desired oxygen concentration for six months. This concept is shown graphically with the remote data, in which the estimated DO was calculated by offsetting the depletion with oxygen addition (Figure 6). The resulting analysis showed that supplementing the oxygen content in each lake with 11 kg/d offset the time of anoxia several days after the observed ice melt and subsequent natural DO recovery. Because there are several caveats with the data and corresponding data analysis (e.g. estimated water volumes, uncertainty of actual remote probe position, and only having two water column profiles that showed decreased DO), it would be recommended to have an oxygen addition strategy that can add upwards of 17 kg/d, which is approximately 150% of the 11 kg/d estimate. 4 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations Figure 2: Sample temperature (top) and DO (bottom) data collected during February 2019 on North Lake Cornelia. 5 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations Figure 3: Sample temperature (top) and DO (bottom) data collected during February 2019 on South Lake Cornelia. 6 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations Figure 4: Remote dissolved oxygen data collected in North (top) and South (bottom) Lake Cornelia, showing linear depletion rates occurring mid-January and early February. 7 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations Figure 5: Aggregated remote DO data collected on North (open symbols) and South (closed symbols) Lake Cornelia with black lines showing data used to determine depletion rates. Table 2: Summary of aggregated dissolved oxygen (DO) data used to determine remotely deployed sensor DO depletion rates 0.5 1.5 2.5 0.5 1.5 16-Jan 16.0 17-Jan 13.2 18-Jan 11.4 19-Jan 3.2 10.4 20-Jan 2.6 9.3 21-Jan 2.1 5.4 8.1 6.8 7.0 22-Jan 1.8 4.7 7.0 6.2 6.5 23-Jan 1.3 4.1 5.0 5.9 6.0 24-Jan 0.3 3.6 4.3 5.4 5.5 25-Jan 3.2 5.0 5.2 26-Jan 1.9 4.3 4.5 27-Jan 0.6 3.6 3.8 28-Jan 0.2 3.1 3.4 29-Jan 2.6 2.9 30-Jan 2.1 2.6 31-Jan 1.7 2.2 1-Feb 1.3 1.9 2-Feb 0.9 1.5 Rate (mg/L d)-0.53 -0.76 -1.37 -0.51 -0.47 ft above bottom ft above bottom North South mg/L Date 8 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations Figure 6: Aggregated remote dissolved oxygen (DO) data for North (top) and South (bottom) Lake Cornelia showing predicted depletion rates (red circles) to match the observed rate of depletion and predicted DO (dashed black line) and corresponding time of anoxia from an oxygen supplement of 11 kg/d. 9 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations Oxygenation Overview Winter oxygenation injects oxygen into the bottom of a lake. The goal of this technology is to prevent the onset of anoxia until ice melts and the DO can recover naturally. For winter projects, the primary goal is ice preservation and then ensuring enough oxygen exists to extend the potential longest time period of historical anoxic conditions. This method of lake water quality reclamation is becoming standard practice in drinking and hydroelectric reservoirs. Adapting this technology to recreational lakes requires scaling down existing technology or developing a new hybrid technology. This section presents common methods to increase the oxygen content in the water column, aeration and oxygenation that are applicable to Lake Cornelia. Aeration and Oxygen Strategies Aeration injects air to a location deep in the lake. Oxygen sparging is similar but uses pure oxygen instead of air. Air is only 20% oxygen. Use of pure (95%) oxygen instead of air increases the rate of oxygen transfer to water from gas by a factor up to ten compared to air in deep, cold locations. There are several technologies that aerate or inject pure oxygen to lakes (Table 1) that are all conceptually simple from a mechanical perspective. These technologies have traditionally been used for oxygen transfer in drinking-water reservoirs to improve raw water quality. Full lift aeration, partial lift aeration, destratification, and linear diffusers are common aeration technologies. TABLE 1 Summary of applicable In Lake Oxygen Management Methods Method Description Full Lift Aeration • Uses air • Water travels the full depth of the lake • Does not cause destratification • Increase in dissolved oxygen concentration varies between 0.5 – 5.0 mg/L depending on sediment chemistry and depth Full Lift Oxygenation • Uses oxygen • Water travels the full depth of the lake • Does not cause destratification • Increase in dissolved oxygen ranges from 2 mg/L to 8 mg/L depending on sediment chemistry and depth Oxygen Enhanced Full Lift Aeration • Same features as full lift aeration • Uses oxygen injection in down flow chamber 10 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations 1. Full Lift Aeration Full lift aeration has been used for oxygen transfer in lakes for several decades. Air is pumped to diffusers in the bottom of a draft or riser tube. The essential idea is that these systems are made of a large pipe inside a larger pipe. The inner pipe (draft tube) extends to just above the lake bottom. Air injected into the pipe entrains large volumes of water into the bottom of the pipe and the bubble water mixture rises to the top of the pipe near the water surface. Water flowing out the top of the inner pipe hits the edges of the outer return pipe, sending the water back down to mid-lake level. Because the water is cold, it falls back to the bottom. A full-lift aeration system entrains water near the bottom and transports it to the surface before it drops back down to the bottom (Figure 7). Figure 7: Full-Lift diagram The increase in oxygen through a hypolimnetic aerator system can be small, sometimes no more than 0.5 mg/L to 1 mg/L. The reason for this problem has two parts: • Does not cause destratification • Increase in dissolved oxygen ranges from 2 mg/L to 8 mg/L depending on sediment chemistry and depth Side-stream Saturation (SSS) • Uses oxygen • Requires pump to circulate water • Does not cause destratification • Increase in dissolved oxygen ranges from 2 mg/L to 20 mg/L 11 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations 1. High chemical oxygen demand. When the hypolimnion loses oxygen, bacteria strip oxygen from iron and manganese. When oxygen is introduced back into the hypolimnion, there is a chemical reaction between oxygen and manganese of iron that strips dissolved oxygen from the water. 2. Limited oxygen transfer capacity of air. Air contains only 20% oxygen. As a result, oxygen saturation in water in the presence of air is only about 11 mg/L. The saturation concentration places a ceiling on how much oxygen can go from air to water and slows down the rate at which oxygen can dissolve from oxygen to air. Often, the rate of chemical oxygen demand in water can exceed the oxygen transfer from air to water. Use of pure oxygen solves both problems, provided there is sufficient water depth as discussed below. 2. Full Lift Oxygenation Full lift oxygenation is a modified air lift aerator technology. The difference is that it would have a longer draft tube to reach to the lake bottom and it would use a pure oxygen generator instead of an air compressor. In general terms, it is like a full-lift aeration system that uses pure oxygen instead of air. That advantage over air is five to tenfold increase in oxygen transfer efficiency (kg O2 transferred / m3 diffused gas). As a result, the system moves much less water than an aeration system. There is far less movement of water that could increase oxygen demand by inducing currents along the sediment surface. In full lift oxygenation, minimum oxygen gain ranges from 2 to 4 mg/L; however, this is contingent on water depth. Compared to an equivalent aeration design, full lift oxygenation uses 80% less gas flow. As a result, flow of water through the system is much less than an aerated system, reducing currents across sediments. Full lift oxygenation can be constructed as a raft mounted system with lighter equipment than full-lift aeration. Consequently, repairs and maintenance can be made from the surface, rather than requiring divers. 3. Oxygen enhanced Full-Lift Aeration Oxygen enhanced full lift aeration is a hybrid technology. This is configured exactly like a full lift aerator as described above but would have pure oxygen gas injected just below the surface in the down flow chamber. In general terms, it is a full-lift aeration system that uses air in the riser and pure oxygen in the down flow chamber (downcomer). The advantages are similar to full lift oxygenation but have the benefit of water circulation of the full lift aerator and have potentially increased 12 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations oxygen input above full lift oxygenation from longer contact time between the oxygen gas and the water. Full-lift aeration has been studied extensively by Burris et al (1998) and applied in several water-supply reservoirs in the United States. Using the theories and dimensional relationships studies by Burris, the larger full-lift systems were scaled down and applied to the Lake Cornelia project. Burris et al (1998) tested a range of flow rates and established a relationship between applied gas flow rate and riser cross section. For a series of tests performed it was found that for a fixed riser cross section, as flow rates increased bubbles were carried over to the down comer (return portion) in which oxygen transfer continued (Figure 8). The winter application of full lift technology follows the same configuration as summer applications during stratification where the downcomer extends to the thermocline (Figure 9). The main difference is the thermocline represents the ice depth. Applying these results to North and South Lake Cornelia full lift aeration would result in an oxygen increase of 0.28 and 0.47 mg/L respectively, which translates to 1.1 and 1.8 kg/d. Based on the 2 and 3% oxygen transfer efficiency of the full lift aeration it would be impractical for Lake Cornelia. Applying these results to North and South Lake Cornelia full lift oxygenation would result in an oxygen increase slightly higher; however, the resulting oxygen input would top out at 5 and 6 kg/d for North and South respectively. Even though this is slightly better than full lift aeration it still only results in approximately 8 – 10 % oxygen transfer efficiency. Just as the full lift aeration was impractical, full lift oxygenation is also not applicable based on the size that would be needed to meet the minimum 11 kg/d let alone 17 kg/d. The third option using full lift technology is the oxygen enhanced full lift aerator. This set up would negate the oxygen addition from the air lift itself and solely be based on the oxygen input capacity applied to the downcomer. Smaller size full lift aerators were sized using a 12” riser and 24” downcomer with an applied air flow rate of 6 scfm to each aerator. For this set up, the downward velocity is estimated to be 0.81 ft/sec. The corresponding upward (oxygen) bubble velocity is 0.72 ft/sec. This would result in oxygen bubbles being in contact with the water for approximately 30 seconds, increasing the predicted oxygen transfer efficiency to 40%. The full lift technology applied to Lake Cornelia is shown in Figure 10 and superimposed on water column profiles for North and South in Figures 11 and 12 respectively. This technology has been proven to preserve ice during winter operation (Figure 13) but requires apparatus (Figure 14) to be present on the ice during operation. This set up provides the flexibility to house all equipment on the raft and run power to the raft or house all 13 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations equipment on shore and plumb air and oxygen lines to each system. Both are viable set ups; however, although this configuration could be sized to meet the 11 kg/d oxygen requirement, it would be challenging to scale up to 17 kg/d. To meet the 11 kg/d minimum oxygen input it would require a bank of oxygen generators plus additional flow control to split the flow between 2 and 4 full lift aerators mounted in the lake. Additionally, each full lift aerator requires either its own air supply or a distinct air control manifold to distribute air appropriately. To put this into perspective, each full lift aerator requires a 1 Hp compressor rated at ~6 scfm and an oxygen supply rated at 0.3 scfm (17 kg/d). Each air lift system would have an estimated oxygen input capacity of 5 – 6 kg/d. If the equipment is mounted on the raft, each aerator would require its own dedicated power cable because of the length of run (~ 600 ft) to the desired deployment location and corresponding power draw. Despite the full lift technology being known to preserve ice during winter operation, there is concern about the amount of apparatus mounted on a raft on the lake and/or equipment mounted on shore and plumbed to a raft system. 14 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations Figure 8: Experimental and model DO profiles for a range of air flow rates for full lift aerators (Burris et al (1998)) with predicted DO increases for North (0.28 mg/L) and South (0.47 mg/L) overlaid on 0.035 Nm3/s, a mid-range applied gas flow rate. 15 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations Figure 9: Full-lift aeration/oxygenation schematic showing relative position in the water column, entraining water from near the lake bottom and discharging to hypolimnion depth. For winter deployment, thermocline depth becomes ice depth. Figure10: Sketch showing recommended riser and down comer lengths with approximate position in the water column for North (left) and South (right) Cornelia Lakes. 16 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations Figure 11: Temperature (top) and DO (bottom) profiles with full-lift apparatus overlaid to show water column positioning and circulation pattern in North Cornelia Lake. 17 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations Figure 12: Temperature (top) and DO (bottom) profiles with full-lift apparatus overlaid to show water column positioning and circulation pattern in South Cornelia Lake. 18 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations Figure 13: Photos of 24” riser and 48” downcomer being assembled/deployed (top) and in operation (bottom). Figure 14. Approximate platform sizes for 24/48 (top) and 12/24 (bottom) riser to downcomer ratio. 19 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations Air supply In order to move the required volume of water in the oxygen enhanced full lift aerator, each 12” rise would need an applied air flow rate of 6 scfm, which can be supplied by a 1 Hp piston air compressor such as the Thomas 2807 WOB-L series oilless piston compressor (Figure 15). Figure 15: Specification for the 2807 WOB-L compressor. 20 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations Oxygen supply For simplicity and expandability, self-contained oxygen generators are recommended. These units operate on 120VAC and are designed to operate 24-7. In order to increase the oxygen capacity for larger requirements, these systems are split into a separate compressor and oxygen generator. The recommended oxygen supply is a Topaz Ultra (Figure 16) from Airsep, a Chart Industries company. https://www.caireinc.com/commercial/products/oxygen-products/self-contained-o2- generators/ Figure 16: Specifications from AirSep for Topaz Ultra oxygen generator. 4. Side-Stream Oxygenation The fourth oxygenation system evaluated was a side-stream saturation (SSS) oxygenation system. A SSS withdraws water from near the lake bottom, oxygenates it, and then returns it to the near the lake bottom (Figure 17). There are a few side-stream oxygenation technologies available in the market. The primary difference between these units is the pressure in the oxygen saturation chamber. According to Henry’s Law, as the partial pressure of oxygen rises in the saturation chamber the oxygen concentration in the water also increases. The SSS oxygenation system is summarized in the flow diagram shown in Figure 17. An intake is placed near the bottom of the lake with a screen to prevent debris from damaging the downstream equipment. A pump is used to pull water from the bottom of the lake and push it through the oxygen contact chamber and back into the lake. The oxygenated water is injected near the bottom via a distribution header. 21 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations Figure 17: Side-stream saturation (SSS) oxygenation process flow diagram showing the main components of the system; in-lake distribution and intake (slotted well screen), pump, oxygen supply, oxygen contact chamber, and corresponding (HDPE) piping (2-pipe system) Side-stream saturation oxygenation systems are designed to achieve 100% oxygen transfer efficiency and ensure the oxygen discharge does not exceed saturation conditions at depth. This ensures the water does not de-gas at discharge depth, which would create a rising bubble and induce undesirable water circulation. Recommended Strategy Side stream saturation oxygenation strategy has the highest oxygen transfer efficiency, would have the least amount of equipment, and provides the least visual impact to the lake. It is therefore the recommended strategy for this project. With any oxygenation system design, there is a level of complexity behind the calculations, layout, and recommendations. It is the focus of this proposal to provide an overview of GWRE recommendations with the intention of providing full detail, if awarded. The following section covers the system design, which includes all the required components to ensure: 22 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations 1. A minimum of 11kg/d can be delivered to water under the ice, 2. 100% oxygen transfer efficiency is achieved in the oxygen contact chamber, 3. Uniform distribution of oxygenated water 4. Minimal disruption to the water column and corresponding ice structure, and 5. No sediment re-suspension. Key design criteria include the following: 1. Oxygen demand per DO analysis is satisfied, 2. Conditions in the oxygen contact chamber (Speece Cone) do not exceed 70% DO saturation, 3. System operating pressure is below the output pressure of the oxygen supply, and 4. Discharge concentration does not exceed 100% DO saturation conditions at discharge depth and temperature. The SSS design, outlined above is accomplished by use of the following system components: • Oxygen supply to provide at minimum 11 kg/d o Topaz Ultra by AirSep, which is a complete self-contained oxygen concentrator o Rated at 10 lpm (up to 17 kg/d) o Outlet pressure of 20 psig (~34.7 psia) o Nominal oxygen purity of 93% o Noise decibal rating of 55 dba • Environmental controls o An exhaust fan to ensure proper air circulation to the oxygen concentrator and o A dehumidifier in the room housing the oxygen concentrator to reduce moisture content to the air flow entering the oxygen concentrator. • A 1.5 Hp pump o Capable of maintaining flow rate at 60 GPM and 50 psia, the recommended water flow rate and pressure of the system, o With built in strainer basket, and o No published noise rating but estimated to be as high as 70 dba. • A Speece Cone oxygen contact chamber o Designed to accommodate 60 GPM o Achieve 100% oxygen transfer efficiency at 12 kg/d oxygen addition requirement; however, capable of up to 17 kg/d to match 23 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations output capacity of the oxygen supply. • Digital flow control to provide accurate oxygen flow rates to increase or decrease oxygen input as necessary. • Suction line o Large enough to minimize head loss and corresponding net positive suction head (NPSH) at the pump inlet to prevent cavitation, o Long enough to reach deepest part of the lake in either east or west basin, and o With slotted well screen. • Distribution Header: o Designed to distribute oxygenated water uniformly along the entire length (100 ft), o Use slotted well screen (same as suction), o Designed to dissipate energy associated with water flow rate as quickly as possible while preserving ice structure, and o Prevent sediment re-suspension Specific details supporting design recommendations Oxygen supply Oxygen supply being rated higher than required. 11 kg/d was identified as the oxygen demand of the system. This is understood to be the minimum oxygen input capacity to prevent formation of anoxic conditions by the time ice begins to melt in the spring. It is therefore recommended to provide a slightly larger design capacity to accommodate potential shortcomings in operation. Dehumidifier and moisture control During prior installations, GW has worked with several different oxygen concentrator sizes. The most important factor in sustained operation of these units is to provide clean dry air to the unit. For larger systems that have a separate air supply, this is accomplished with refrigerated dryers and moisture coalescing filters. For smaller, self-contained units, this is more difficult to achieve because the air supply is contained within the unit. As a result, the smaller units are more sensitive to moisture content in feed air. A way to counter this design limitation is to house the unit in an isolated enclosure with environmental controls. For this application, it is recommended to isolate the oxygen concentrator in a small room ~ 3’ x 4’ and use a reliable dehumidifier in parallel with good air circulation. Distribution piping 24 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations The in-lake distribution piping design applies the same characteristics that has been key to success with line diffusers; robust, essentially maintenance free, and accessible for repair if needed without the use of divers. This consist of a two- pipe system, a supply pipe and a buoyancy pipe, with all connections fusion welded. The two-pipe system can be fabricated on land and extruded to the lake, where it floats on the surface until it is ready to be pulled into position and deployed. To deploy the system on the bottom, the buoyancy line is flooded, which causes the system to sink to the bottom Piping and fittings All piping designed to carry water are proposed to be of HDPE construction, with the exception of the suction and discharge headers which are sch 80 pvc. All fittings to transition between components such as the pump and the oxygen contact chamber will be 304 stainless steel. Oxygen supply line between the oxygen concentrator (Topaz) and the oxygen contact chamber (Speece Cone) will be flexible copper with brass fittings as necessary. An example of the flow control piping is shown in Figure 18. Figure 18: Example of Alicat flow control header with braided SS supply line from oxygen supply, brass fittings, and flexible copper out the outflow side to an oxygen contact chamber. System layout Suction and discharge header The intake and discharge headers use slotted well screen, which are designed to have minimal velocities, which is important for Lake Cornelia to ensure sediment and debris are not entrained in the intake and the exit velocity does not induce mixing to disturb ice. The basic layout of the piping in the lake is to position the distribution header along the deepest part of the water column in one basin and have the suction header also in the deepest part of 25 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations the water column but position in the other basin, which are shown as a red lines at the end of the black distribution lines (Figure 19). Shore-based equipment The shore-based equipment was laid out using approximate spacing for adequate working conditions. Based on this approximate layout, all equipment would require a minimum of an 8’ X 8’ footprint. This allowed for enough space between the pump and contact chamber as well as the required offset for piping and air flow around the pump (Figure 20). Additionally, a small section ~3’ X 4’ is shown in one corner with a 30” access door for the Topaz oxygen concentrator. A standard height ceiling would be enough, which is based on the maximum height being less than six feet (Figure 21). Although it is difficult to recommend system layouts for a site unseen, it would be recommended to house the equipment in a structure that compliments the area surroundings. Beyond the structure, the only component that would be visible to the public would be the pipe(s) at the water edge. It would be recommended to install all shore-based piping in a suitable trench and then covered and reseeded to minimize disruption to the environment. Additionally, trenching and covering would be essential to install the pipes below the frost line with adequate insulation for piping coming above grade. With regards to the building and the noise concern it is recommended to use a noise attenuation material such as acoustiblok, https://www.acoustiblok.com/. 26 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations Figure 19: Proposed SSS layout for North and South Lake Cornelia. Each lake would have intakes from one basin and discharge header in the other basin. Figure 20: Proposed system layout showing 8’ x 8’ building footprint, estimated equipment layout and recommended offsets. Note the oxygen concentrator (Topaz) located in a 3’ x 4’ sectioned off room for improved environmental control. Figure 21: Sketch showing pump and oxygen contact chamber to demonstrate approximate height of equipment. 27 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations Side-Stream Saturation Oxygenation Cost Estimate 28 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations Monitoring Considerations 29 Lake Cornelia Winter Oxygenation Design Considerations Hypolimnetic Aerators: Characterizing and Optimizing Performance Final Report to City of Norfolk and CH2M Hill; Vickie Burris and John Little; Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University; January 1998 (Personal Communication) Hypolimnetic Aerators: Predicting Oxygen Transfer and Water Flow Rate Vickie Burris;1998; Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-011399- 122244/unrestricted/ETD1.PDF ) Bubble dynamics and oxygen transfer in a hypolimnetic aerator Vickie L. Burris and John C. Little; Water Science and Technology Vol. 37 No 2 pp 293–300 © IWA Publishing 1998 Appendix F WSB Carp and Goldfish Monitoring Scope GOLDFISH AND COMMON CARP POPULATION AND INTER-WATERBODY MOVEMENT ASSESSMENT IN LAKE CORNELIA SYSTEM Proposal for the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District March 2, 2020 Prepared by: Jordan Wein, Environmental Scientist WSB, 178 East 9th Street, Suite 200, St. Paul, MN 55101 GOLDFISH AND COMMON CARP POPULATION AND INTER-WATERBODY MOVEMENT PROPOSAL ASSESSMENT IN LAKE CORNELIA SYSTEM NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PAGE 2 INTRODUCTION Invasive goldfish have just been added to the MAISRC priority list for investigation. They are being released into lakes around the Twin Cities Metro. Clearly, education is needed to prevent initial infestations. But little is known about the risk of spread of this invasive species to other connected water bodies if an infestation has been confirmed. The results of this study and education initiative will work to prevent introductions as well as guide planning and management of watersheds to take rapid action to stop the spread of goldfish in this system and others in Hennepin County. In addition to goldfish, common carp are well-known to be a significant driver of poor water quality parameters. While foraging, they root around in lake sediments where nutrients like phosphorous can be locked up in an inactive form. When disturbance occurs from an overabundance of carp, large amounts of phosphorous is reintroduced to the water column where it becomes available for algae. This in turn promotes green algae blooms as well as turbid water conditions. Both North and South Cornelia are on the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s Impaired Waters list due to excess nutrient loads. The main parameters that are measured to decide if a water body belongs on this list are total phosphorous (TP), chlorophyll-a (algae abundance), and clarity (measured by secchi depth). Goldfish and common carp can contribute significantly to the internal loading of TP and management of their populations below a threshold of 100kg/ha (Bajer et al, 2009) is generally considered to be an inexpensive method of managing internal loading (Bartodziej et al, 2017). In 2018, surveys completed by Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District for Nine Mile Creek Watershed District identified carp in Cornelia Lake and surrounding potential nursery lakes. Goldfish and carp were found in numbers that warranted more rigorous assessment and understanding of inter- lake spatial usage in order to guide future long-term management. To properly assess for goldfish and carp biomass levels and the presence of YOY, WSB recommends that electrofishing surveys be properly completed as deemed by protocols in Bajer and Sorensen (2012). It is also important to know the movement capabilities and patterns between and within lakes in the Cornelia system. WSB would utilize passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags to track movement via antennas at strategic locations in the Cornelia system. To understand the history of recruitment in this system, an age structure will be developed for goldfish and carp to connect past environmental conditions in which the lake system was at risk. That structure will also help determine how often biomass reduction efforts are needed over the long-term time scale moving forward. Finally, WSB will test a system for biomass reduction that has been found to be effective at species specific capture of carp. It will be tested in Nancy Lake where the population of goldfish was found to be very high. This test will allow the watershed district to plan for the future of removals (if needed) and costs associated with that effort. In general, the data collected in this work will serve as the scientific baseline to determine if/what population reduction is needed to meet biomass goals, understand important pathways to movement, and strategize if/what management of goldfish and/or carp should be planned for the future in order to improve water quality and promote the health of the lake ecosystems. To obtain approval of the Minnesota DNR Fisheries, a small amount of time has been included to account for this process. Any administrative expenditures to manage the accounting of this project will be covered by the project management line item. The following is a detailed description of the recommended work plan: GOLDFISH AND COMMON CARP POPULATION AND INTER-WATERBODY MOVEMENT PROPOSAL ASSESSMENT IN LAKE CORNELIA SYSTEM NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PAGE 3 ELECTROFISHING SURVEYS TO ESTIMATE POPULATION AND IMPLANT PIT TAGS To reduce cost, this effort will be coupled with electrofishing surveys for the project submitted to the Hennepin County Aquatic Invasive Species grant. A small amount of time will be added to the goldfish surveys in order to simultaneously collect data about the carp biomass and implant PIT tags while the carp are in hand. These surveys are best done between the months of July and September while carp are more evenly distributed around the lake. WSB would conduct at least three 20-minute transects in randomized sections of shoreline in each water body. We would conduct these surveys on three different days at least one week apart. This is to account for differences in environmental conditions that may bias the catch rate. We would use the catch per unit effort (CPUE) model described in Bajer and Sorensen (2012) to quickly determine the carp density, average size/weight and scale that to the lake for an overall goldfish and carp biomass (kg/ha). We will measure, weigh, implant a PIT tag and give a pelvic fin clip before releasing back to the lake. In subsequent capture events, if enough individuals are recaptured, we will be able to calculate a mark/recapture population estimate. This is generally more reliable but requires more effort and cost. From these data, we will report on the size structure of the populations in each lake with the CPUE data and a calculated carp biomass. INSTALLING PIT ANTENNAS TO MONITOR CARP MOVEMENT BETWEEN LAKES Antennas would be constructed, installed and tested to monitor the movements of goldfish and carp in the Cornelia Lake system. Four locations (Figure 1) would have antennas installed to determine which water bodies are important in the recruitment of carp in the system. It will determine what time of year, what proportion of the population is moving and how often use the pathway between bodies. These antennas will be in place before PIT tags are implanted during the electrofishing surveys described above. The antennas will run for one year in order to capture the unbiased movement in the spring of 2021, when spawning migrations are anticipated to occur. Long term PIT monitoring data is very valuable, so we recommend considering further monitoring of these locations for the future. If the results show a sizeable movement of tagged fish through one or more pathways, consideration and planning of barriers to impede movement and/or a trap to target the migrations for biomass removal can be built into a management plan. GOLDFISH AND COMMON CARP POPULATION AND INTER-WATERBODY MOVEMENT PROPOSAL ASSESSMENT IN LAKE CORNELIA SYSTEM NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PAGE 4 Figure 1: Illustration of locations of PIT antennas strategically placed in potential fish pathways. GOLDFISH AND COMMON CARP POPULATION AND INTER-WATERBODY MOVEMENT PROPOSAL ASSESSMENT IN LAKE CORNELIA SYSTEM NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PAGE 5 TESTING RAPID MANAGEMENT ACTION TO ADDRESS LOCALIZED INFESTATIONS We will employ a technique found to be successful in small water bodies with common carp to determine efficacy with goldfish. A box net trap refers to a mesh net that lays on the lake bottom with attached walls around the outside. These walls are attached to vertical metal pipes that extend above the water surface. The walls are attached to ropes that are run to shore and when the ropes are pulled in, the walls quickly rise above the surface trapping the fish within the trap area inside. The fish are corralled to a corner and removed with a dip net. A modified baited-box-net trap (one with a mesh size appropriate for goldfish instead of adult carp) will be deployed in Nancy Lake and baited with cracked corn (or another bait seen to be effective). A bait bag will be placed on top of the net in order to draw in goldfish. Lake residents will tend the bait, filling it if the bag is empty, once per day for up to seven days of baiting and report to WSB. After the first removal attempt, we will drop the walls and bait for an additional week in order to test the trap a second time. This method has been found to be over 98% selective for carp. All fish captured will be counted and measured. All goldfish will be removed from the lake. Figure 2: A box net trap with walls raised GOLDFISH AND COMMON CARP POPULATION AND INTER-WATERBODY MOVEMENT PROPOSAL ASSESSMENT IN LAKE CORNELIA SYSTEM NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PAGE 6 UNDERSTANDING RECRUITMENT STATUS IN THE LAKE COMPLEX WSB recommends that a sample of fish be euthanized during electrofishing surveys or the baited box net tests and examined to determine age. We would do this by removing the inner ear bones called otoliths and cross sectioning them under a microscope to document the growth rings (annuli). If otoliths are not able to be sampled with goldfish, we will also collect scales to examine. The ages will be grouped and examined to determine past year classes of recruitment. Altogether, this helps gain a history of recruitment that impacted the current overall population. Using that history, we would draw insight into a long-term management plan for reduction of biomass and the “lifespan” of the work. The larger the sample the better, since low recruitment years can be missed with a small sample size. We recommend at least a sample of 50. BUDGET TABLE: Cornelia Lake System Goldfish and Carp Assessment 2020 Expenses Env. Scientist V hours Env. Scientist VI hours Line item total Hourly rate $90 $97 Overhead Permitting and project management 7 $630 Part 1: Goldfish assessment Electrofishing surveys and PIT tagging goldfish $849 52 52 $10,573 Construction and installation of PIT antennas 27 16 $3,982 Testing baited box net trap for capture of goldfish ($500 for net, $350 for corn)$850 24 16 $4,562 Annual PIT antenna rental ($1,500/system) $6,000 $6,000 Age structure for goldfish (sample of 50) 34 $3,060 Data analysis and reporting 24 $2,160 Part 2: Additional carp objectives Additional surveying time to implant carp tags while electrofishing $400 7 7 $1,709 PIT antenna installs and monitoring 0 0 $0 Ageing structure for carp (sample of 50) 30 4 $3,088 Additional time for data analysis and reporting 6 $540 Goldfish population and interwater body movement assessment $30,967 Carp specific additional objectives $5,337 Overall Project total $36,304 GOLDFISH AND COMMON CARP POPULATION AND INTER-WATERBODY MOVEMENT PROPOSAL ASSESSMENT IN LAKE CORNELIA SYSTEM NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PAGE 7 TIMELINE: JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecemberJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayConstruction and installation of PIT antennas Electrofishing surveys for population assessment and PIT tag implantation Ageing structure for goldfish and carp (sample of 50) Testing of baited box net trap in Nancy Lake Data analysis and reporting (preliminary and final) 2020 2021 GOLDFISH AND COMMON CARP POPULATION AND INTER-WATERBODY MOVEMENT PROPOSAL ASSESSMENT IN LAKE CORNELIA SYSTEM NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PAGE 8 REFERENCES: Bartodziej, W., Sorensen, P.W., Bajer, P.G., Pilgrim, K. and Blood, S. 2017. A Minnesota story: Urban shallow lake management. NALMS Lakeline. 23-29. Bajer, P.G., and Sorensen, P.W. 2012. Using boat electrofishing to estimate the abundance of invasive common carp in small midwestern lakes. North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 32:5, 817-822. Bajer, P.G., Sullivan, G., and Sorensen, P.W. 2009. Effects of a rapidly increasing population of common carp on vegetative cover and waterfowl in a recently restored midwestern shallow lake. Hydrobiologia. 632: 235-245. Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.I. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Stephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:Approve Amended VEAP Service Agreement Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Amended Services Agreement with VEAP outlining the general conditions of the use of the $400,000 Cares Act grant to provide Emergency Rental Assistance to residents of Edina. INTRODUCTION: On July 21 the City Council approved the award of a $400,000 CARES Act grant to VEAP. To ensure compliance with the CARES Act, the City's auditor has recommended some additional language be added to the Amended Services Agreement. The revised agreement has been reviewed by the City Attorney. ATTACHMENTS: Description Amended Service Agreement V2 Amended Service Agreement V2 (redline) AMENDED SERVICE AGREEMENT AMENDED AGREEMENT made this 18th day of August, 2020, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a municipal corporation (“City”), and VEAP (“Service Provider”). RECITALS A. COVID-19 has altered the way we conduct business globally with significant economic impacts. B. One population that has been, and will continue to be, hit the hardest are the lowest income. C. On December 17, 2019 the City Council approved the Human Services Funding recommendations that included $17,296 in 2020 for Volunteers Enlisted to Assist People (VEAP). D. On April 7, 2020 the City Council approved an Affordable Housing Trust Fund allocation of and additional $100,000 in Emergency Rental Assistance for VEAP. E. Minn. Stat. § M.S. 12.37, 471.935, 412.221 Subd. 32 authorizes the City to appropriate money and make expenditures for the specified purpose. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PAYMENT. The City hereby grants Service Provider an additional $400,000.00 (“Supplemental Rental Assistance”) for a total grant amount of $517,296.00 to alleviate housing insecurity by providing housing advocacy and rent assistance to Edina residents. 2. SERVICES PROVIDED. VEAP supports low-income renters to maintain safe and stable housing by communicating with property management and negotiating payment arrangements, a need which could increase as job hours are cut or job loss occurs. VEAP also provides limited emergency rent assistance to help maintain housing stability and prevent homelessness. If the funds or any part of it is not used for the purpose intended, it shall be returned to the City. 3. Initial grant award of $17,296.00 remains for the Service Provider to provide Access to healthy foods, stable housing, and financial support and assistance for low-income families, children, seniors, and individuals at serious risk of hunger and homelessness. 4. The additional $400,000 is allocated for Emergency Rental Assistance and administrative expenditures associated with carrying out this function. 5. GENERAL CONDITIONS. a. Service Provider agrees that it will comply with all federal, state, and local statutes and ordinances relating to nondiscrimination. i. Service Provider agrees that it is responsible for ensuring that all funds it receives from the City pursuant to this Agreement are used in a manner that is consistent with the CARES Act, CFDA #21.019, as well as any implementing regulations, and the federal guidance issued on April 22, 2020, May 4, 2020, May 28, 2020, June 24, 2020 and June 30, 2020 for State, Territorial, Local and Tribal Governments, including any amendments, clarifications or updates thereto that may be issued by the federal government or the State. ii. Service Provider agrees that emergency rental assistance should be structured in a manner to ensure as much as possible, within the realm of what is administratively feasible, that such assistance is necessary for individuals and families directly impacted by a loss of income due to the COVID-19 public health emergency. iii. Service Provider agrees that it is responsible for ensuring compliance with the following sections in the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200), as applicable: 2 C.F.R. § 200.303 regarding internal controls, 2 C.F.R. §§ 200.330 through 200.332 regarding subrecipient monitoring and management, and subpart F regarding Single Audit requirements. b. Service Provider shall at all times be an independent contractor and shall not be the employee of the City for any purpose. c. All data created, collected, received, maintained, or disseminated for any purpose in the course of this Agreement is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. St t. Ch. 13, any other applicable state statute, or any state rules adopted to implement the act, as well as federal regulations on data privacy. d. All books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and p -s of the Service Provider and its (sub)contractor(s), if any, relative to this Agreement are subject to examination by the City. e. All Supplemental Rental Assistance shall be used solely for the benefit of Edina Residents. CITY OF EDINA BY: ___________________________ (Mayor) AND: __________________________ (City Manager) VEAP, Inc By: ____________________________ (Joe McDonald, CEP VEAP) AMENDED SERVICE AGREEMENT AMENDED AGREEMENT made this 18th day of August, 2020, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a municipal corporation (“City”), and VEAP (“Service Provider”). RECITALS A. COVID-19 has altered the way we conduct business globally with significant economic impacts. B. One population that has been, and will continue to be, hit the hardest are the lowest income. C. On December 17, 2019 the City Council approved the Human Services Funding recommendations that included $17,296 in 2020 for Volunteers Enlisted to Assist People (VEAP). D. On April 7, 2020 the City Council approved an Affordable Housing Trust Fund allocation of and additional $100,000 in Emergency Rental Assistance for VEAP. E. Minn. Stat. § M.S. 12.37, 471.935, 412.221 Subd. 32 authorizes the City to appropriate money and make expenditures for the specified purpose. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PAYMENT. The City hereby grants Service Provider an additional $400,000.00 (“Supplemental Rental Assistance”) for a total grant amount of $517,296.00 to alleviate housing insecurity by providing housing advocacy and rent assistance to Edina residents. 2. SERVICES PROVIDED. VEAP supports low-income renters to maintain safe and stable housing by communicating with property management and negotiating payment arrangements, a need which could increase as job hours are cut or job loss occurs. VEAP also provides limited emergency rent assistance to help maintain housing stability and prevent homelessness. If the funds or any part of it is not used for the purpose intended, it shall be returned to the City. 3. Initial grant award of $17,296.00 remains for the Service Provider to provide Access to healthy foods, stable housing, and financial support and assistance for low-income families, children, seniors, and individuals at serious risk of hunger and homelessness. 4. The additional $400,000 is allocated for Emergency Rental Assistance and administrative expenditures associated with carrying out this function. 5. GENERAL CONDITIONS. a. Service Provider agrees that it will comply with all federal, state, and local statutes and ordinances relating to nondiscrimination. i. Service Provider agrees that it is responsible for ensuring that all funds it receives from the City pursuant to this Agreement are used in a manner that is consistent with the CARES Act, CFDA #21.019, as well as any implementing regulations, and the federal guidance issued on April 22, 2020, May 4, 2020, May 28, 2020, June 24, 2020 and June 30, 2020 for State, Territorial, Local and Tribal Governments, including any amendments, clarifications or updates thereto that may be issued by the federal government or the State. ii. Service Provider agrees that emergency rental assistance should be structured in a manner to ensure as much as possible, within the realm of what is administratively feasible, that such assistance is necessary for individuals and families directly impacted by a loss of income due to the COVID-19 public health emergency. iii. Service Provider agrees that it is responsible for ensuring compliance with the following sections in the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200), as applicable: 2 C.F.R. § 200.303 regarding internal controls, 2 C.F.R. §§ 200.330 through 200.332 regarding subrecipient monitoring and management, and subpart F regarding Single Audit requirements. b. Service Provider shall at all times be an independent contractor and shall not be the employee of the City for any purpose. c. All data created, collected, received, maintained, or disseminated for any purpose in the course of this Agreement is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. St t. Ch. 13, any other applicable state statute, or any state rules adopted to implement the act, as well as federal regulations on data privacy. d. All books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and p -s of the Service Provider and its (sub)contractor(s), if any, relative to this Agreement are subject to examination by the City. e. All Supplemental Rental Assistance shall be used solely for the benefit of Edina Residents. CITY OF EDINA BY: ___________________________ (Mayor) AND: __________________________ (City Manager) VEAP, Inc By: ____________________________ (Joe McDonald, CEP VEAP) Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.J. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad Eischens, General Manager-Braemar Arena Item Activity: Subject:Approve Lease Agreement with Breakaway Academy Inc. Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Lease Agreement between Breakaway Academy and the City for use of Braemar Arena. INTRODUCTION: This is a lease agreement between Breakaway Academy Inc. and the City for use of Braemar Arena for ice usage during the Academy's school year, approximately Sept. 1 to May 31 annually, 8:45 a.m. to 3:45 p.m. daily. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Approve Lease Agreement with Breakaway Academy Inc. Breakaway Academy Lease Agreement August 18, 2020 Mayor and City Council Chad Eischens, General Manager-Braemar Arena & Field Approve Lease Agreement with Breakaway Academy Inc. Information / Background: In early May, Braemar Arena staff were approached by representatives from Breakaway Academy Inc. regarding a potential partnership for daytime ice usage. Breakaway Academy is a private school open to boys and girls in grades 1-8. The Academy has outgrown their former space and has recently relocated students in grades 4-8 to the former Winter Park facility in Eden Prairie. Breakaway Academy’s athletics program is hockey focused providing a natural fit for their needs at Braemar Arena. The agreement provides daytime usage of the Braemar facility during the school year, approximately Sept. 1 to May 31 annually, and 8:45 a.m. to 3:45 p.m. daily. This is time that is not normally utilized by Braemar and would provide the arena with the ability to capture revenue from additional ice hours and diversify our operations. Staff has looked closely at Breakaway Academy’s needs, our own City programming and current daytime users to ensure there is adequate ice time for all parties. In addition, as a courtesy staff contacted the Edina Hockey Association and the Edina School District Athletics Department and neither group is opposed of the new use by Breakaway Academy. The use outlined in the lease agreement will not interfere with either EHA or the School District ice times. City staff and Breakaway Academy representatives have worked closely together on the facility rental agreement and both agree on the terms prepared by the City Attorney. Action Requested: Staff recommends approval of the Lease Agreement between Breakaway Inc. and the City for use of Braemar Arena. 1 210710v1 BRAEMAR ICE ARENA FACILITY RENTAL AGREEMENT This Facility Rental Agreement (“Agreement”), made and entered into this 18th day of August, 2020, by and between the City of Edina (“City”) and Breakaway Academy Inc., a Minnesota corporation (“User”). 1. Facility Use. During the term of this Agreement, the User shall have the use of two ice rinks, as assigned by the City, including locker rooms and a conference room (collectively the “Facility”) in the Braemar Ice Arena between the hours of 8:45 A.M. and 3:45 P.M. from September 1 – May 31 in each school year. The Facility includes use of the common areas (lobby, seating areas, restrooms and hallways), sound system and microphone, hockey goals, scoreboard and controls, lighting, and janitorial services. The City may cancel use of the Facility by the User for a maximum of 50 hours per school year. This cancellation shall not reduce the User’s monthly cost. User may not use the Facility during Edina Hockey Association (EHA), Edina High School (EHS) and other scheduled tournaments and events at the facility. The User shall provide City with a school calendar by June 1st and an initial ice schedule by August 1st each year. 2. Cost. The monthly cost for the use of the Facility is: 2020 - 2021 school year $7,560 per month 2021 - 2022 school year $8,640 per month 2022 – 2023 school year $9,720 per month 2023 - 2024 school year $10,011.60 per month For the purpose of this agreement the price per month is based off of 160-164 days of usage. Should Breakaway Academy use less than 160 days the city would owe Breakaway Academy a refund based on a per day price. If Breakaway Academy exceeds 164 days they would owe the City additional rent payment based on per day price. Any settlement payment would be owed to Breakaway Academy or the City no later than June 15th of that school year. The price per day is as follows: 2020 - 2021 school year $420 per day 2021 - 2022 school year $480 per day 2022 – 2023 school year $540 per day 2023 - 2024 school year $556.20 per day If the User is only able to use the facility for half a day due to a City scheduling conflict on the half day shall count toward the Users allotment of 160-164 days as half a day. Two half days would count as one full day. Payment is due on or before the 5th day of the month preceding usage of the Facility. Failure to remit payment as required on or before the due date shall be grounds for denial of ice rental for that month. A late charge shall be imposed in an amount equal to five percent (5%) per month of unpaid rent. User agrees to pay for any intentional damage done to the facility or its grounds by its participants. A one thousand-dollar ($1,000.00) security deposit shall be due with the August rent payment. The deposit will be held for the school year and repaid in full by June 30th of each year pending no intentional damage is done to the facility. 2 210710v1 3. Ice Resurfacing. An ice resurfacing schedule shall be mutually agreed upon by the City and the User. 4. Rules and Regulations. The rules and regulations of the Braemar Ice Arena, the Center for Disease Control, the Minnesota Department of Health and COVID rules and regulations as amended from time to time, shall be and are a part of this rental agreement as though they were set out in full herein, and are specifically incorporated as a part hereof by reference. Violation of any of the rules and regulations by any player, volunteer or employee of the User shall be grounds to bar future use of the Ice Arena by that person, according to the Ice Arena’s zero tolerance and disciplinary action programs. 5. Insurance. The User shall, at its own expense, provide such public liability insurance as will protect the User and the City from all claims for damages to property and persons, including death and the use of products, giving cause for claims or damages, which may arise from the use of the City property or from anyone directly or indirectly employed by the User. Such public liability insurance shall provide limits of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for any number of persons per occurrence injured or killed. Property damage liability insurance shall provide a limit of not less than Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000.00) per occurrence. The City shall be named an additional named insured on a primary and non- contributory basis in said policy or policies and the User shall furnish to the City evidence of insurance by a certificate of insurance of required coverage. 6. Assignment. The User shall not assign or transfer its rights and privileges granted under this Agreement, either in whole or in part, without first obtaining the written consent of the City. The resale of ice time by the User is specifically prohibited. 7. Termination. The City may terminate this Agreement if any of the provisions, terms or conditions of this Agreement have been violated after giving ten (10) business days’ (excludes public holidays and weekends) advance written notice to the User of the City’s intention to so terminate the Agreement. The User shall have then ten (10) business days (excludes public holidays and weekends) to cure the violation or seek agreement with the City. At the end of the ten (10) day period (the “Cure Period”), all of the rights of the User hereunder shall terminate unless said violation is cured to the satisfaction of the City or other agents or officials of the City. Such termination shall not waive the right of the City to recover damages from the User for its failure to comply with the terms of this Agreement. The acceptance of monies due the City for any period or periods after a default of any of the terms, covenants or conditions of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver on the part of the City. No waiver of default by the City of any of the terms, covenants or conditions hereof shall be construed to be or act as a waiver of any subsequent default of any of the terms, covenants and conditions herein contained to be performed, kept and observed by the User. 8. Term. The Term of this Facility Rental Agreement is September 1, 2020 through May 31, 2024. 9. Severability. If any provisions of this Agreement shall be invalid for any reason, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining provisions herein, the parties to this Agreement 3 210710v1 hereby declaring that they would have agreed to the other provisions of this Agreement notwithstanding such invalidity. WITNESSETH, the parties hereto execute this Agreement on the date and year first above written. CITY OF EDINA BY: James Hovland, Mayor AND Scott Neal, City Manager BREAKAWAY ACADEMY INC. BY: David Snuggerud, Director of Education AND Lyman A. Brink, Director of Athletics Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.K. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Advisory Communication From:David Nelson, Chief of Police Item Activity: Subject:Approve Cooperative Agreement for Police Mental Health Program Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Cooperative Agreement for Police Mental Health Program. INTRODUCTION: The Edina and Richfield police departments are entering into a multi-year agreement with Hennepin County human services to provide a social worker that will be shared between both agencies. T he social worker will work two days at Edina and two days at Richfield. T he fifth day will be a floater between both cities. T he tentative start date for the social worker in Edina is August 31, 2020. The goal of the program is to better serve clients when dealing with mental health issues in our communities. This can be achieved by identifying gaps in the client’s support systems and recommending alternatives. With this program the hope is to reduce repeated mental health calls for the same issues and improve the quality of life for those who suffer from mental illness and have encounters with law enforcement. ATTACHMENTS: Description Cooperative Agreement for Police Mental Health Program Agreement 1 HC# A2010280 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR POLICE MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAM This agreement (the “Agreement”) is between the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA, A-2300 Government Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 (“COUNTY”), on behalf of the Hennepin County Human Services and Public Health Department (“HSPHD”), and City of Edina (“EDINA”) 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, and City of Richfield (“RICHFIELD”) 6700 Portland Avenue, Richfield, Minnesota 55423. (EDINA and RICHFIELD alternately may be referred to individually as a “CITY” and collectively as the “CITIES”). The parties to this Agreement may also be referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as “Parties”. WHEREAS, in 2018 the Edina Police Department (“EPD”) and Richfield Police Department (“RPD”) completed extensive research on the increase in mental health calls and traditional officer response to mental health emergencies. The research included an overview of best practices used to improve officer interactions with individuals experiencing mental health emergencies. This research specifically found opportunity to provide follow up care to prevent reoccurrences of emergency crises. Based on the research of other jurisdictions, a licensed clinician embedded with the police departments and shared between EPD and RPD is recommended; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to implement the above-stated recommendations.> NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings and agreements hereinafter set forth, the Parties agree as follows: 1. TERM OF THE AGREEMENT The term of the Agreement shall be from September 1, 2020, through December 31, 2022, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the Cancellation provision of this Agreement. 2. FUNDING / PAYMENT A. Funding is provided via the CITIES’ approved budgets. EDINA and RICHFIELD will each fund 30 percent of the annual cost for a mental health professional (Senior Social Worker). For the period September 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020, the not-to- exceed amount for each City will be $10,000.00. For the period January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2021, the not-to-exceed amount for each City will be $30,000.00. For the period January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022, the not-to-exceed amount for each City will be $30,000.00. B. The Senior Social Worker (“SSW”) will be hired, employed, and equipped by HSPHD and participate in supervision and training by HSPHD in accordance 2 HC# A2010280 with local, state, federal, and professional licensure requirements. C. HSPHD shall within thirty (30) calendar days following the last day of each quarter submit an invoice to each CITY for 30% of the cost of one position assigned to the program. D. Each CITY will make payment within thirty-five (35) days from receipt of the invoice. If the invoice is incorrect, defective, or otherwise improper, CITY will notify HSPHD within ten (10) days of receiving the incorrect invoice. Upon receiving the corrected invoice from HSPHD, CITY will make payment within thirty-five (35) days. 3. DUTIES OF HSPHD A. HSPHD shall assign one SSW who, along with a Social Work Unit Supervisor, will work with officers to develop and implement a Police-Mental Health Unit. The SSW will remain the responsibility of, and be provided supervision by, HSPHD. HSPHD staff will participate with CITIES in service delivery and program development as part of a team and will meet all standards for delivery of service according to professional licensure. B. HSPHD shall participate with CITIES in program design, management of resources, program evaluation, and data collection as collectively approved by supervisors of HSPHD and CITIES. C. A Planning Group comprised of representatives of each Party will develop and operationalize the pilot program and will be managed by police administration. Integration of mental health program design and service delivery elements with police response will be directed by HSPHD Adult Behavioral Health Program Manager. Social Work Unit Supervisor will provide direct supervision of the mental health professional/Senior Social Worker under this Agreement. D. A service description is outlined in EXHIBIT A: Description of Services, which is incorporated into and made part of this Agreement. 4. LIABILITY / INDEMNIFICATION / DUTY TO NOTIFY A. Each Party shall be liable for its own acts and the results thereof to the extent provided by law, and shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the other Parties (including their present and former officials, officers, agents, employees, volunteers, and subcontractors), from any liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs, or expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of the indemnifying Party, anyone directly or indirectly employed by it and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions it may be liable, in the performance or failure to perform its obligations under this Agreement. Each Party’s liability shall be governed by the 3 HC# A2010280 provisions of Minnesota Statutes, chapter 466 and other applicable law. B. Under no circumstances shall a Party be required to pay on behalf of itself and other Parties, any amounts in excess of the limits on liability established in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 applicable to any one Party. The limits of liability for some or all of the Parties may not be added together to determine the maximum amount of liability for any Party. For purposes of liability under this Agreement, the Parties are considered a single governmental unit pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 471.59, subd. 1a(b). C. Duty to Notify: Each Party shall promptly notify the other Parties of any claim, action, cause of action or litigation brought against the notifying Party, its present and former officials, officers, agents, employees, volunteers, and subcontractors which arises out of the services described in this Agreement and shall also notify the other Parties whenever there is a reasonable basis for believing that the notifying Party, its present and former officials, officers, agents, employees, volunteers or subcontractors, and one or more of the other Parties, might become the subject of a claim, action, cause of action, administrative action, criminal arrest, criminal charge or litigation arising out of/or related to the services described in this Agreement. 5. INSURANCE Each Party warrants that it has purchased insurance or has established and funded a self- insurance program. A Party may obtain copies of certificates of insurance upon request. 6. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION Each Party shall be responsible for injuries or death of its own personnel. Each Party will maintain workers’ compensation insurance or self-insurance coverage, covering its own personnel while they are performing activities pursuant to this Agreement. Each Party waives the right to sue any other Party for any workers’ compensation benefits paid to its own employees or volunteer or their dependents, even if the injuries were caused wholly or partially by the negligence of any other Party or its officers, employees, or volunteers. 7. INDEPENDENT PARTY A. It is understood that the relationship between all Parties constitutes only the understandings set forth in this Agreement B. It is further agreed that, notwithstanding any other formal, written agreements or contracts which may exist between COUNTY and a CITY, nothing is intended or should be construed in any manner as creating or establishing the relationship of 4 HC# A2010280 partners between the Parties hereto or as constituting a CITY as the agent, representative, or employee of COUNTY for any purpose or in any manner whatsoever. Each CITY is to be and shall remain an independent contractor with respect to all services performed under this Agreement. Each CITY will secure at its own expense all personnel required in performing services under this Agreement. Any personnel of a CITY or other persons while engaged in the performance of any work or services required by a CITY shall have no contractual relationship with COUNTY and will not be considered employees of COUNTY. COUNTY shall not be responsible for any claims related to or on behalf of any of a CITY’s personnel, including without limitation, claims that arise out of employment or alleged employment under the Minnesota Unemployment Insurance Law (Minnesota Statutes Chapter 268) or the Minnesota Workers' Compensation Act (Minnesota Statutes Chapter 176), or claims of discrimination arising out of state, local, or federal law, against a CITY, its officers, agents, contractors, or employees. Such personnel or other persons shall neither require nor be entitled to any compensation, rights, or benefits of any kind from COUNTY, including, without limitation, tenure rights, medical and hospital care, sick and vacation leave, workers' compensation, unemployment compensation, disability, severance pay, and retirement benefits. 8. NONDISCRIMINATION Each Party agrees that it shall not exclude any person from full employment rights or participation in, or the benefits of, any program, service or activity on the grounds of any protected status or class including but not limited to race, color, creed, religion, age, sex, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, public assistance status, or national origin; and no person who is protected by applicable federal or state laws against discrimination shall be otherwise subjected to discrimination. 9. NO THIRD PARTY Except as herein specifically provided, no other person, customer, employee, or invitee of COUNTY or CITIES or any other third party shall be deemed to be a third- party beneficiary of any of the provisions herein. 10. DATA PRIVACY Each Party and their respective officers, agents, owners, partners, employees, volunteers and subcontractors, shall abide by the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, and all other applicable state and federal laws, rules, regulations and orders relating to data privacy, confidentiality, disclosure of medical records or other health and enrollment information, and as any of the same may be amended. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 5 HC# A2010280 11. PROGRAM STATISTICAL INFORMATION Each Party agrees to maintain such statistical records relating to services as shall be necessary, appropriate, and convenient for the proper administration of this Agreement. 12. MERGER, MODIFICATION, AND SEVERABILITY A. The entire agreement between the Parties is contained herein and supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the Parties relating to the subject matter. All items are referenced or that are attached are incorporated and made part of this Agreement. If there is any conflict between the terms of this Agreement and referenced or attached items, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. B. CITIES and COUNTY are each bound by its own electronic signature(s) on this Agreement, and each agrees and accepts the electronic signature of the other Party. C. Any alterations, variations, or modifications of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement signed by the Parties. Except as expressly provided, the substantive legal terms contained in the Agreement including but not limited to Liability / Indemnification / Duty to Notify; Insurance; Workers’ Compensation; Merger, Modification and Severability; Cancellation or Minnesota Law Governs may not be altered, varied, modified or waived by any change order, implementation plan, scope of work, development specification or other development process or document. D. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will not be affected. 13. CANCELLATION A. This Agreement may be canceled with or without cause by any CITY as to that city, or by COUNTY, upon thirty (30) days written notice. B. If HSPHD has reason to believe that the safety or well-being of a SSW may be endangered by actions of a CITY, its agents, and/or employees, HSPHD may terminate the Agreement immediately. 14. SURVIVAL OF PROVISIONS Provisions that by their nature are intended to survive the term, cancellation or termination of this Agreement do survive such term, cancellation or termination. Such provisions include but are not limited to: INDEPENDENT PARTIES; LIABILITY / INDEMNIFICATION / DUTY TO NOTIFY; INSURANCE; WORKERS’ COMPENSATION; DATA PRIVACY; MARKETING AND PROMOTIONAL LITERATURE; and MINNESOTA LAW GOVERNS. 6 HC# A2010280 15. NOTICES Any notice or demand which must be given or made by a Party hereto under the terms of this Agreement or any statute, rule, regulation or ordinance shall be in writing, and shall be sent via registered or certified mail. Notice to HSPHD shall be sent to COUNTY Administration at the address listed in the opening paragraph of this Agreement, with a copy to HSPHD as described below. Notice to a CITY shall be sent to one of the following addresses: EDINA Jeff Elasky Deputy Chief 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MiN 55424 RICHFIELD Mike Flaherty Deputy Chief 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield, MN 55423 HSPHD Leah Kaiser Senior Department Administrator Hennepin County 300 South 6th Street Minneapolis, MN 55487 16. MARKETING AND PROMOTIONAL LITERATURE CITIES agree that the terms, “Hennepin County”, “Human Services and Public Health Department”, or any derivatives thereof, shall not be utilized in any promotional literature or advertisements of any type without the express prior written consent of COUNTY. 17. MINNESOTA LAWS GOVERN The laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern all questions and interpretations concerning the validity and construction of this Agreement and the legal relations between the Parties and their performance. The appropriate venue and jurisdiction for any litigation will be those courts located within the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. Litigation, however, in the federal courts involving the Parties will be in the appropriate federal court within the State of Minnesota. (The remainder of this page intentionally left blank.) 7 HC# A2010280 HENNEPIN COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR APPROVAL RECEIVABLE AGREEMENT The Parties hereto agree to be bound by the provisions set forth in this Agreement. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Reviewed for COUNTY by the STATE OF MINNESOTA County Attorney’s Office By: County Administrator Date: Date: Reviewed by By: ______________________________________ Director/Deputy County Administrator Date: _____________________________________ CITY OF EDINA CITY OF EDINA By: ____________________________ By: ____________________________ Title: _________________________ Title: ___________________________ Date: _________________________ Date: ___________________________ CITY OF RICHFIELD CITY OF RICHFIELD By: __________________________ By: __________________________ Title: _________________________ Title: _________________________ Date: _________________________ Date: _________________________ 1 HC# A199501 Exhibit A: Description of Services The CITIES and HSPHD staff will comprise a Police-Mental Health Unit. Roles and Responsibilities of Parties • CITIES will provide office space and a desk for the Senior Social Worker (SSW). • CITIES will work with the Social Work Unit Supervisor (SWUS) to establish criteria for referrals. • CITIES will work with the SWUS to develop a referral process. • CITIES will track referrals and repeat calls. • CITIES will accompany the SSW to home visits as needed. • HSPHD will be responsible for providing the SSW with equipment that is necessary for completing their work. This includes but is not limited to laptop computer, cell phone, and office supplies. • The SSW will report directly to the HSPHD SWUS. • HSPHD will be responsible for transportation/mileage expenses for the SSW. The SSW will be responsible following the HSPHD transportation/mileage reimbursement policies. • The SSW will provide short-term assistance to clients in order to connect the individuals with internal and/or community resources to help meet their needs. Services will be provided in an ethical and culturally sensitive manner. • After being assigned a case, the SSW will complete a file clearance of the various systems to determine if the individual is open to social services, county of financial responsibility, and public assistance programs. • The SSW will meet the client, assess the client’s needs, note formal and informal supports, and determine where gaps exist. • The SSW will request or complete updated diagnostic assessments as needed. • The initial assessment should include the risks to the safety and stability of the client as well as the client’s ability to address such concerns. The SSW will also evaluate the need for emergency services and if needed will assist in making 2 HC# A199501 Exhibit A: Description of Services those connections. • The SSW will work with the client to develop an initial plan that addresses gaps that exist in the client’s support system and will work with the client to identify and connect with community resources. This plan will be signed by both the client and the SSW. • The SSW will ensure that release of information forms are signed and that other paperwork is completed in a timely manner. No information will be shared with either CITY without a signed release. • If community and/or county resources are needed, the SSW will collect information needed to determine eligibility for those services. The SSW will facilitate referrals to appropriate resources. • The SSW will collaborate with other involved parties as indicated. • If eligible for county operated or contracted case management services, the SSW will complete the necessary paperwork to transfer the client to case management. • The SSW will document all activities and data as requested for tracking purposes. • Client participation is voluntary, and the client has a right to refuse services. Goals of the Police-Mental Health Unit include, but are not limited to: • More timely engagement of SSW with individuals; • Increased use of community resources to support individuals; • Increased use of public assistance programs; • Increased use of non-urgent health care systems; • Improved engagement of current service providers; • Ongoing collaboration and learning between HSPHD and Police Department; • Improving the quality of life for those who suffer from mental illness and have encounters with law enforcement; 3 HC# A199501 Exhibit A: Description of Services • Reducing use of force, injury or death to officers and community members; • Reducing rate of arrests/prosecution of persons in mental health crisis and increase the number of persons who remain in community settings with services and supports; • Creating cost-savings through reduction of (incarceration and hospitalization) 911 calls regarding mental health crisis; • Reducing repeat calls and visits for the same issue; • Improving efficacy of law enforcement response to emergency and non-emergency mental health issues; and • Increasing public satisfaction with the response to mental health emergencies and other metrics developed during the pilot utilizing key stakeholder and community input. Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.L. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Accept Public Access and Public Parking Easements, and Affordable Housing Covenants at 4500 France Avenue Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Public Access and Public Parking Easements, and Affordable Housing Covenants. INTRODUCTION: As part of the 4500 France mixed use project these documents were required as part of the approval. The attached documents were reviewed and approved by the city attorney. ATTACHMENTS: Description Plaza Easement Agreement Parking Easement Agreement Sidewalk Easement Agreement Right of First Purchase Option Agreement Public Access Easement Agreement Affordable Housing Restrictive Covenant 4823-3633-8116\3 PLAZA EASEMENT AGREEMENT between THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA and ORION 4500 FRANCE, LLC Dated as of ____________, 2020 THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Dorsey & Whitney LLP 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 4823-3633-8116\3 PLAZA EASEMENT AGREEMENT (4500 France) THIS PLAZA EASEMENT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into this ___ day of ___________, 2020 (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota statutory city (the “City”), and ORION 4500 FRANCE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Owner”). RECITALS: A. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”), the City, and Owner, as “Developer”, are parties to that certain Redevelopment Agreement dated December 18, 2018 (as amended, the “Contract”). B. The Contract provides for the redevelopment by Owner of certain real property legally described on the attached Exhibit A (referred to herein and in the Contract as the “Redevelopment Area”) and located within the 44th & France 2 Tax Incremental Financing District, established by the Authority pursuant to Resolution No. 2018-100, in coordination with the Authority and with the cooperation and assistance of the City. C. The Contract provides for the expenditure of certain public funds to assist in the redevelopment of the Redevelopment Area with certain “Minimum Improvements” consisting generally of a new 4-story, mixed use project, including an approximately 46-unit apartment building and approximately 6,500 square feet of ground-level restaurant and retail space. D. The Minimum Improvements also include a ground-level, outdoor plaza and amenity area (referred to herein and in the Contract as the “Plaza”), which such Plaza is located on that portion of the Redevelopment Area legally described on the attached Exhibit B-1 and depicted on the attached Exhibit B-2 (the “Plaza Property”). E. The City and Owner have agreed in the Contract that Owner shall grant an easement to the City pursuant to which the Plaza will be permanently open and accessible to the general public for its use and enjoyment pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. F. Owner has agreed to own, operate, manage, and maintain the Plaza pursuant and subject to the terms and conditions of the Contract and this Agreement. G. The City and Owner deem it to be in their interests and in furtherance of the economic development and redevelopment plan for the Redevelopment Area reflected in the Contract to enter into this Agreement. H. All capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Contract. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the others as follows: 2 4823-3633-8116\3 ARTICLE I. GRANT OF EASEMENTS Section 1.1. Easement Premises. Owner hereby grants and conveys to the City, for the benefit of the City and the general public: (a) a non-exclusive, perpetual public easement over, across, upon and through the Plaza Property, together with and including all (i) surface improvements now or hereafter located thereon, including, without limitation, all paving, sidewalks, and pathways, and (ii) all amenities, components, and fixtures now or hereafter located thereon, including, without limitation, all benches, tables, chairs, and trash receptacles, all to the extent required by the Final Development Plan, Development Contract, and the Contract (collectively, the “Plaza Premises”) for the purpose of the general public utilizing the Plaza Premises and its components as a public plaza, in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and (b) a non-exclusive, perpetual public easement over, across, upon and through all means of pedestrian and vehicular access to and from public rights of way, streets, alleys, public spaces, and easements appurtenant and/or used in connection with the Plaza Premises located on the Redevelopment Area and adjoining or contiguous to the Plaza Premises, including all roads, driveways, parking lots, exterior concourses, passageways, sidewalks and stairways providing such means of access, (collectively, the “Access Premises”, and together with the Plaza Premises, collectively the “Easement Premises”), all in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. ARTICLE II. TERM Section 2.1. Term. The easements granted hereby, and each reservation, covenant, condition and restriction contained in this Agreement, shall be effective as of the date hereof, shall be perpetual, and shall remain in effect until affirmatively released by the City. Such release shall be evidenced by the recording of a release or termination of this Agreement in the real estate records of Hennepin County, Minnesota, at which time this Agreement shall terminate, subject to reconciliation of expenses and obligations incurred through the date of release or termination and the continuation of those provisions that specifically survive termination of this Agreement, and the Plaza and any other areas of the Easement Premises shall thereafter belong to and be under the sole control of Owner. ARTICLE III. USE OF EASEMENT PREMISES Section 3.1. Operation and Control of Easement Premises. During the term of this Agreement, Owner shall operate the Easement Premises in accordance with this Agreement and all applicable governmental laws, ordinances, regulations and orders, at Owner’s sole cost and 3 4823-3633-8116\3 expense. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Owner has full authority and control over the management, operation, and use of the Easement Premises. Owner is entitled to keep and retain as its own property all income and revenue produced from the use and operation of the Easement Premises during the term of this Agreement and shall have no obligation to report to or account to the City for any such income or revenue or with respect to expenses incurred by Owner in its use and operation of the Easement Premises, provided, however, all use of the Plaza by the general public shall be free of charge and Owner shall not charge any fee for the use of the Plaza pursuant to this Agreement. Section 3.2. Special Events. The easement rights granted hereunder include the right for the City and/or members of the general public (including organizations not affiliated with the City) to reserve and use the Plaza Premises for periodic community special events (e.g., fundraising walks/runs, art fairs, holiday events, community celebrations, etc.), provided that Owner may establish an application and permit process for such special events and require that the sponsor of such special event enter into a standard form license or similar agreement with Owner for the use of the Plaza Premises containing certain conditions, requirements, and restrictions which must be met by the special event’s sponsor (e.g., insurance requirements, clean-up responsibilities, etc.). The terms and conditions of any such permit/application process and all such license/use agreements shall be commercially reasonable and applied to all users and special event sponsors on a non-discriminatory basis. Section 3.3. Waste, Nuisance, Damage, Disfigurement or Injury to Easement Premises. Neither the City nor Owner shall knowingly or willfully commit or suffer to be committed any waste or damage in or upon the Easement Premises, or any disfigurement or injury to any improvements hereafter erected or located upon the Easement Premises, or any part thereof, or the fixtures and/or equipment thereof. Owner, in its use and occupancy of the Easement Premises, shall not knowingly and willfully commit or suffer to be committed any act or thing which constitutes a nuisance. Usual and normal wear and tear, damage by the elements, unavoidable casualty or depreciation and diminution over time shall not be considered “waste,” “nuisance,” “damage, “disfigurement,” or “injury.” Section 3.4. Owner’s Reservation of Certain Rights. The City’s easement rights under this Agreement shall be subject to the following reservations, as well as the other applicable provisions contained in this Agreement: (a) Owner reserves the right to close-off any portion of the Easement Premises for such reasonable period of time as may be legally necessary, in the opinion of Owner’s counsel, to prevent the acquisition of prescriptive rights by anyone; provided, however, that prior to closing-off any portion of the Easement Premises, Owner shall give as much written notice as reasonably practicable of its intention to do so. (b) Owner reserves the right at any time and from time to time to exclude and restrain any private party from access to the Plaza for cause and on a non-discriminatory basis. (c) Owner reserves the right to temporarily erect or place barriers in and around areas on the Easement Premises which are being constructed and/or repaired in order to 4 4823-3633-8116\3 ensure either safety of persons or protection of property. (d) Owner reserves the right to adopt and enforce reasonable rules and regulations for the safe, efficient, and orderly use and operation of the Easement Premises, so long as such rules and regulations are applied on a non-discriminatory basis, do not adversely impact the City’s or the public’s rights to use of the Easement Premises as set forth in this Agreement, and are mutually agreed to by Owner and the City Manager. By way of example and not limitation, Owner may establish the following hours of operation: from April 15 to October 31, 7:00 a.m. – 10:00 p.m. and from November 1 to April 14, 7:00 a.m. – 8:00 p.m. (e) Owner may impose reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on the use of and activity within the Plaza, provided such restrictions are content neutral and imposed to the extent necessary to ensure the safe operation of the Plaza and the Minimum Improvements as a whole (e.g., promoting the safety of the residents of the residential element of the Minimum Improvements). ARTICLE IV. MAINTENANCE OF THE EASEMENT PREMISES Section 4.1. Maintenance. At all times during the term hereof, Owner, at its cost and expense, shall keep and maintain the Easement Premises and the other Minimum Improvements in good condition and repair in a first-class manner, similar to that of other public plazas located within other first-class, multi-use projects in the Minneapolis-Saint Paul metropolitan area, which such maintenance shall include, without limitation, the following: (a) all repairs, replacements, renewals, alterations, additions and betterments thereto, structural and non-structural, ordinary and extraordinary, and foreseen and unforeseen, all as may be necessary to keep the Easement Premises and the other Minimum Improvements in the condition and repair required by this Agreement, and which are consistent with the requirements of the Final Development Plan, Development Contract and the Contract, and are not inconsistent with the City’s or the public’s rights to use of the Easement Premises as set forth in this Agreement; (b) the inspection, repair, replacement, and maintenance of all pedestrian surfaces to a smooth and evenly-covered condition, which obligation includes, without limitation, the cleaning, sweeping, repairing and resurfacing of such pedestrian surfaces; (c) periodic removal of all papers, debris, filth, refuse, ice and snow, provided all sweeping shall be at appropriate intervals during such times as shall not unreasonably interfere with the use of the Easement Premises; (d) maintaining and replacing all landscaping and other vegetation; (e) placing, keeping in repair, replacing and repainting any appropriate directional signs or markers within or associated with the Easement Premises; 5 4823-3633-8116\3 (f) operating, keeping in repair, cleaning and replacing when necessary such lighting facilities as may be reasonably required, including, without limitation, all lighting necessary or appropriate for security of the Easement Premises; and (g) maintaining in good working order, repairing, and replacing as necessary all domestic water, sewer, storm water, gas, electricity, power, heat, telephone, other communications service and any and all other utility or similar services used, rendered, or supplied, upon, at, from, or in connection with the Easement Premises. Section 4.2. No Obligation of the City to Repair or Maintain. The City shall have no obligation of any kind, expressed or implied, to repair, rebuild, restore, reconstruct, modify, alter, replace, or maintain the Easement Premises or any part thereof. ARTICLE V. UTILITIES Section 5.1. Utility Charges. During the term of this Agreement, Owner shall pay, or cause to be paid, when the same become due, all charges for water, sewer usage, storm water, gas, electricity, power, heat, telephone, or other communications service and any and all other utility or similar services used, rendered, supplied, or consumed in, upon, at, from, or in connection with the Easement Premises, or any part thereof. TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS Section 6.1. Payment of Taxes and Assessments. Owner shall pay, or cause to be paid, before becoming delinquent, all real estate taxes, charges, assessments, and levies, assessed and levied by any governmental taxing authority during the term of this Agreement against the Easement Premises and the other Minimum Improvements. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall require Owner to pay any franchise, estate, inheritance, excise, succession, capital levy, or transfer tax of the City or any income, excess profits or revenue tax payable by the City under this Agreement. Subject to the terms of the Contract, Owner shall have the right and option, at any time but solely at Owner’s expense, to pay any real estate taxes or assessments in installments or under protest or in a similar manner, or to contest the levy or amount of the same in appropriate legal or administrative proceedings. ARTICLE VII. INDEMNIFICATION, INSURANCE Section 7.1. Indemnification of the City. Except to the extent caused by the willful misconduct or negligence of the City, its employees or agents, or the general public, or arising out of the default by the City and its officers, employees or agents of obligations made pursuant to a contract with Owner, including this Agreement, Owner hereby covenants and agrees to assume and to permanently indemnify and save harmless the City and its employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, damages, costs, expenses, reasonable attorneys’ fees, and liability in connection with the loss of life, personal injury and/or damage to property, to the 6 4823-3633-8116\3 extent arising from or out of the design or initial construction, maintenance and operation of the Easement Premises, or in connection with the use or occupancy of the Easement Premises, or any part thereof, by Owner, or to the extent arising out of the breach of Owner’s obligations hereunder. Section 7.2. Property Insurance. At all times during the term hereof, Owner, at its sole cost and expense, shall keep the Easement Premises and the other Minimum Improvements, and all alterations, extensions, and improvements thereto and replacements thereof, insured, in the amount of the full replacement cost thereof and with such deductibles as Owner deems appropriate, against loss or damage by fire and against those casualties covered by extended coverage insurance and against vandalism and malicious mischief and against such other risks, of a similar or dissimilar nature, as are customarily covered with respect to improvements similar in construction, general location, use, and occupancy to such improvements. Section 7.3. Personal Property. All property of every kind and character which Owner may keep or store in, at, upon, or about the Easement Premises shall be kept and stored at the sole risk, cost, and expense of Owner. Section 7.4. Liability Insurance. During the term of this Agreement, Owner shall procure and maintain continuously in effect (or shall cause the same to occur), the following policies of insurance of the kind and minimum amounts as are customarily maintained with respect to facilities and improvements similar to those located on the Easement Premises, at commercially reasonable coverage levels, to be reviewed from time to time by Owner: insurance against liability for injuries to or death of any person or damage to or loss of property arising out of or in any way relating to the use, occupancy, or condition of the Easement Premises, or any part thereof, including insuring the indemnification obligations set forth in Section 7.1 above. Such insurance shall provide that the City is an additional insured. Section 7.5. General Insurance Requirement. All insurance required in this Agreement shall be placed with financially sound and reputable insurers licensed to transact business in the State of Minnesota. Owner shall promptly following the City’s request therefor, furnish the City with copies of policies evidencing all such insurance or a certificate or certificates of the respective insurers stating that such insurance is in force and effect. Each policy of insurance herein required shall contain a provision that the insurer shall not cancel it without giving written notice to the City at least 10 days before the cancellation becomes effective. The insurance coverage herein required may be provided by a blanket insurance policy or policies. Section 7.6. No Obligation of the City for Insurance. At no time and under no circumstances shall the City be required to take out, maintain in force and effect, or pay for any type of insurance coverage with reference to the protection of and/or ownership of and/or occupancy of and/or a suit relating to the Easement Premises and/or any improvements hereafter located thereon. ARTICLE VIII. ASSIGNMENT Section 8.1. Assignment by the City. During the term of this Agreement, the City may 7 4823-3633-8116\3 not assign or transfer its interest under this Agreement without the prior written consent of Owner. Section 8.2. Assignment by Owner. During the term of the Contract, Owner may not assign or otherwise transfer its interest under this Agreement, except as provided in the Contract. The City shall recognize and approve any successors or assigns of Owner in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Contract. Following the full and final payment of the TIF Note issued under the terms of the Contract, Owner may assign this Agreement without consent of the City. ARTICLE IX. CASUALTY Section 9.1. Destruction. In the event that all or any part of the Easement Premises and/or other portions of the Minimum Improvements are destroyed by fire or other casualty, and subject to a determination by the relevant mortgage lender, Owner shall promptly rebuild or reconstruct the same to the extent insurance proceeds are available or, in the event insurance proceeds are not sufficient to reconstruct the same, to the extent insurance proceeds combined with any contributions by Owner toward reconstruction are available. ARTICLE X. EMINENT DOMAIN Section 10.1. Major Condemnation. If all of the Easement Premises is taken, acquired, or condemned by eminent domain for any public or quasi-public use or purpose, this Agreement shall terminate as of the date of vesting of title in the condemning authority. Each party shall make its own claim in the condemnation proceeding based upon the value of its respective interest in the Easement Premises. ARTICLE XI. DEFAULT AND REMEDIES Section 11.1. Default By Owner. If Owner fails to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement, and fails to cure such default after 30 days’ written notice of such default or, if such default cannot reasonably be cured within such 30 days, fails to commence curative action and thereafter diligently complete the same, then, in such case, the City may pursue all available remedies at law and in equity. ARTICLE XII. MISCELLANEOUS Section 12.1. Waiver. The waiver by any party hereto of any breach or default of any provisions anywhere contained in this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach or default thereof. No provision of this Agreement shall be deemed to have been waived by any party hereto unless such waiver is in writing and signed by the party charged with any such waiver. 8 4823-3633-8116\3 Section 12.2. Amendments. Except as otherwise herein provided, and not otherwise, no subsequent alteration, amendment, change, waiver, discharge, termination, deletion, or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon either party unless in writing and signed by both parties. Owner and the City agree to join in and consent to amendments to this Agreement, to the extent such amendments are reasonably required by Owner’s relevant mortgage lender encumbering the Easement Premises, provided; however, that Owner and the City shall not be required to enter into any amendment which does not adequately protect the legitimate interest and security of the Authority or the City with respect to the redevelopment of the Redevelopment Area as contemplated in the Contract. Section 12.3. Joinder; Permitted Encumbrance. Except for the mortgagee consent attached hereto, this Agreement does not require the joinder or approval of any other person and each of the parties respectfully has the full, unrestricted and exclusive legal right and power to enter into this Agreement for the term and upon the provisions herein recited and for the use and purposes hereinabove set forth. This Agreement shall constitute a permitted encumbrance under any loan agreement heretofore or hereafter entered into between Owner and any construction lender or permanent lender. Section 12.4. Dedication. Nothing contained in this Agreement will be deemed to be a gift or dedication of any portion of the Easement Premises to the general public, except as explicitly set forth in this Agreement. Section 12.5. Notices. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, a notice, demand or other communication under this Agreement by any party to any other shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is (a) dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, (b) sent by recognized overnight courier (such as Federal Express), or (c) delivered personally, as follows: In the case of Owner: Orion 4500 France, LLC Attn: Ted Carlson 4530 West 77th Street, Suite 365 Edina, MN 55435 In the case of the City: City of Edina Attn: City Manager 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 with a copy to: Dorsey & Whitney LLP Attn: Jay Lindgren 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address with respect to any such party as that party may, from time to time, designate in writing and forward to the other, as provided in this Section. Section 12.6. No Third Party Beneficiary. This Agreement is not intended to give or confer any benefits, rights, privileges, claims, action or remedies to any person or entity. 9 4823-3633-8116\3 Section 12.7. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. Section 12.8. Law Governing. This Agreement will be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. Section 12.9. Consents and Approvals. In all cases where consents or approvals are required hereunder, such consents or approvals shall not be unreasonably conditioned, delayed or withheld. All consents or approvals shall be in writing in order to be effective. Section 12.10. No Additional Waiver Implied by One Waiver. If any agreement contained in this Agreement should be breached by any party and thereafter waived by another party, such waiver shall be limited to the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive any other concurrent, previous or subsequent breach hereunder. Section 12.11. Survival. The easements granted hereby and each reservation, covenant, condition and restriction contained in this Agreement will run with the land and will be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, as the case may be, Owner and the City and their respective successors and assigns. Section 12.12. Subdivision. The parties acknowledge that the Redevelopment Area may be subdivided by a Registered Land Survey. Following such subdivision, the fee owner of any portion of the Redevelopment Area may prepare an amendment to this Agreement to (i) confirm those parcels of the Redevelopment Area which are burdened or benefitted by the terms and condition of this Agreement, and (ii) release all other parcels of the Redevelopment Area from the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Such owner shall deliver the amendment to the all other fee owners of the Redevelopment Area and to the City for execution, and all other fee owners of the Redevelopment Area and the City shall promptly execute and acknowledge the amendment and return it to the fee owner that prepared the amendment for recording against title to the Redevelopment Area. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature pages follow] [Signature Page to Plaza Easement Agreement (4500 France)] 4823-3633-8116\3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. CITY: CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: Its: Mayor By: Its: City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of ___________, 2020, by ____________ and ____________, the Mayor and City Manager respectively, of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of the City. Notary Public [Signature Page to Plaza Easement Agreement (4500 France)] 4823-3633-8116\3 OWNER: ORION 4500 FRANCE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: Orion Investments Edina II, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company Its: Manager By: Name: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of ___________, 2020, by ______________________, the _________________ of ORION INVESTMENTS EDINA II, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, as the manager of ORION 4500 FRANCE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability companies. Notary Public A-1 [Exhibit A to Plaza Easement Agreement (4500 France)] 4823-3633-8116\3 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Redevelopment Area Real property in the City of Edina, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, described as follows: Parcel 1: Lots 1 and 2 and that part of Lot 6 described as follows: Commencing at the most Northerly corner of said Lot 6; thence South along the East line of said lot; 40.62 feet; thence Northwesterly 30.2 feet to a point on the Northerly line of said Lot 6, distant 27.19 feet Westerly from the point of beginning; thence Northeasterly to the point of beginning, all in Block 2, "Fairbairn's Rearrangement" in Waveland and Waveland Park, including all of the vacated alley which lies North of the South line of said Lot 2 extended West, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Abstract property) Parcel 2: Lots 3, 4 and 5; That part of Lot 6, described as follows: Commencing on the Easterly line of said Lot at a point distant 40.62 feet Southerly from the most Northerly corner of said Lot, thence Northwesterly 30.2 feet to a point on the Northwesterly line of said Lot distant 27.19 feet Southwesterly from the most Northerly corner of said Lot; thence Southwesterly along the Northwesterly line of said Lot to the most Westerly corner of said Lot, thence Southeasterly along the Southwesterly line of said Lot to the most Southerly corner of said Lot, thence Northerly along the Easterly line of said Lot to the point of beginning; That part of the alley now vacated, described as follows: Commencing at the point of intersection of the center line of alley, now vacated with the North line of Lot 3 extended Westward, thence East on said extended line to the Northwest corner of said Lot 3, thence along the Easterly line of said alley to the most Southerly corner of Lot 5, thence Southwesterly along an extension of the Southeasterly line of said Lot to the center line of said alley, thence Northwesterly along the center line of said alley to a point of its intersection with a line erected to bisect the angle existing in the Westerly line of said alley, thence Southwest along said line to the West line of said alley, thence North along said West line to a point in said line 40.62 feet South of the most Northerly corner of Lot 6, the same being the point of intersection to said West line of alley with the extension Westward of the North line of Lot 3, thence East along said extended line to the point of beginning; All in Block 2, "Fairbairn's Rearrangement" in Waveland and Waveland Park. Hennepin County, Minnesota (Torrens property, Certificate of Title No. 1474225) A-2 [Exhibit A to Plaza Easement Agreement (4500 France)] 4823-3633-8116\3 Parcel 3: Lot 7, Block 2, Fairbairn's Rearrangement in Waveland and Waveland Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together with that part of the adjacent vacated alley that accrued thereto by reason of the vacation thereof. (Abstract property) Parcel 4: Lot 8, Block 2, Fairbairn's Rearrangement in Waveland and Waveland Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota less and except that portion described as commencing at the most westerly corner of said Lot 8; thence on an assumed bearing of North 47 degrees 35 minutes 29 seconds East, along the northerly line of said Lot 8, a distance of 12.00 feet; thence South 33 degrees 43 minutes 44 seconds East, parallel with the west line of said Lot 8, a distance of 75.00 feet; thence South 47 degrees 35 minutes 29 seconds West, parallel with said northerly line of Lot 8, a distance of 12.00 feet, to said west line of Lot 8; thence North 33 degrees 43 minutes 44 seconds West, along said west line of Lot 8, a distance of 75.00 feet to the point of beginning. (Abstract property) B-1-1 [Exhibit B-1 to Plaza Easement Agreement (4500 France)] 4823-3633-8116\3 EXHIBIT B-1 Legal Description of the Plaza Property An easement over, under, and across that part of Lots 7 and 8, Block 2, Fairbairn’s Rearrangement in Waveland and Waveland Park, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as commencing at the most westerly corner of said Lot 8; thence on an assumed bearing of North 47 degrees 35 minutes 29 seconds East, along the northerly line of said Lot 8, a distance of 12.00 feet to the point of beginning of the easement to be described; thence South 33 degrees 43 minutes 44 seconds East, parallel with the west line of said Lot 8, a distance of 108.97 feet; thence North 48 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East 16.89 feet; thence North 42 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 8.11 feet; thence North 48 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East 34.63 feet; thence North 42 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 52.38 feet; thence North 48 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East 4.20 feet; thence North 42 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 47.63 feet to the northerly line of said Block 2; thence South 47 degrees 35 minutes 29 seconds West, along said northerly line of Block 2, a distance of 40.05 feet to the point of beginning. B-2-1 [Exhibit B-2 to Plaza Easement Agreement (4500 France)] 4823-3633-8116\3 EXHIBIT B-2 Depiction of the Plaza Property [See attached.] B-2-2 [Exhibit B-2 to Plaza Easement Agreement (4500 France)] 4823-3633-8116\3 4823-3633-8116\3 CONSENT AND SUBORDINATION The undersigned, Bremer Bank, National Association, a national banking association, holder of that certain Mortgage, Security Agreement, Fixture Financing Statement and Assignment of Leases and Rents executed by Orion 4500 France, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, dated July 1, 2019, filed July 15, 2019, as Document No. A10678911, in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and filed July 8, 2019, as Document No. T05626060, in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota (the “Mortgage”), hereby consents to the foregoing Plaza Easement Agreement (4500 France) (the “Easement Agreement”), and hereby subjects and subordinates the Mortgage and all of its right, title and interest in and to the Easement Agreement. Bremer Bank, National Association, a national banking association By: Name: Title: STATE OF ______________ ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of ___________, 2020, by ____________________, the _________________ of Bremer Bank, National Association, a national banking association, on behalf of the association. Notary Public 4842-6565-2420\3 PARKING EASEMENT AGREEMENT between THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA and ORION 4500 FRANCE, LLC Dated as of ______________, 2020 THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Dorsey & Whitney LLP 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 4842-6565-2420\3 PARKING EASEMENT AGREEMENT (4500 France) THIS PARKING EASEMENT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into this ___ day of _________________, 2020 (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota statutory city (the “City”), and ORION 4500 FRANCE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Owner”). RECITALS: A. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”), the City, and Owner, as “Developer”, are parties to that certain Redevelopment Agreement dated December 18, 2018 (as amended, the “Contract”). B. The Contract provides for the redevelopment by Owner of certain real property legally described on the attached Exhibit A (referred to herein and in the Contract as the “Redevelopment Area”) and located within the 44th & France 2 Tax Incremental Financing District, established by the Authority pursuant to Resolution No. 2018-100 in coordination with the Authority and with the cooperation and assistance of the City. C. The Contract provides for the expenditure of certain public funds to assist in the redevelopment of the Redevelopment Area with certain “Minimum Improvements” consisting generally of a new 4-story, mixed use project, including an approximately 46-unit apartment building and approximately 6,500 square feet of ground-level restaurant and retail space. D. The Minimum Improvements also include at least 35, but the actual quantity will be inserted in the final easement agreement based on the total quantity constructed per the approved Final Development Plan at-grade, enclosed public parking stalls (referred to herein and in the Contract as the “Public Parking”) which such Public Parking is located on that portion of the Redevelopment Area legally described on the attached Exhibit B-1 and depicted on the attached Exhibit B-2 (the “Public Parking Area”). E. The City and Owner have agreed in the Contract that Owner shall grant an easement to the City pursuant to which the Public Parking will be permanently open and accessible to the general public for parking purposes pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. F. Owner has agreed to own, operate, manage, and maintain the Public Parking and Public Parking Area pursuant and subject to the terms and conditions of the Contract and this Agreement. G. The City and Owner deem it to be in their interests and in furtherance of the economic development and redevelopment plan for the Redevelopment Area reflected in the Contract to enter into this Agreement. H. All capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Contract. 2 4842-6565-2420\3 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the others as follows: ARTICLE I GRANT OF EASEMENTS Section 1.1 Easement Premises. Owner hereby grants and conveys to the City, for the benefit of the City and the general public: (a) a non-exclusive, perpetual public easement over, across, upon and through the Public Parking Area, together with and including all ancillary amenities, components, and fixtures located thereon and therein for the users of the Public Parking in general and as required by the Final Development Plan, Development Contract and the Contract (e.g., bike racks, bike repair facilities and equipment, EV charging stations) (collectively, the “Parking Premises”), for the purpose of the general public utilizing the Public Parking for vehicular parking and utilizing such ancillary amenities, if any, all in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement; and (b) a non-exclusive, perpetual public easement over, across, upon and through all means of pedestrian and vehicular access to and from public rights of way, streets, alleys, public spaces, and easements appurtenant and/or used in connection with the Parking Premises, located on the Redevelopment Area and adjoining or contiguous to the Parking Premises, including all roads, driveways, parking lots, exterior concourses, passageways, sidewalks and stairways providing such means of access (but excluding all such areas or means of access intended to serve as exclusively private access to, or for the sole benefit of, the other commercial and/or residential elements of the Minimum Improvements) (collectively, the “Access Premises”, and together with the Parking Premises, collectively the “Easement Premises”), all in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. ARTICLE II TERM Section 2.1 Term. The easements granted hereby, and each reservation, covenant, condition and restriction contained in this Agreement, shall be effective as of the date hereof, shall be perpetual, and shall remain in effect until affirmatively released by the City. Such release shall be evidenced by the recording of a release or termination of this Agreement in the real estate records of Hennepin County, Minnesota, at which time this Agreement shall terminate, subject to reconciliation of expenses and obligations incurred through the date of release or termination and the continuation of those provisions that specifically survive termination of this Agreement, and the Public Parking and any other areas of the Easement Premises shall thereafter belong to and be under the sole control of Owner. ARTICLE III 3 4842-6565-2420\3 USE OF EASEMENT PREMISES Section 3.1 Operation and Control of Easement Premises. During the term of this Agreement, Owner shall operate the Easement Premises in accordance with this Agreement and all applicable governmental laws, ordinances, regulations and orders, at Owner’s sole cost and expense. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Owner has full authority and control over the management, operation, and use of the Easement Premises. Owner is entitled to keep and retain as its own property all income and revenue produced from the use and operation of the Easement Premises during the term of this Agreement and shall have no obligation to report to or account to the City for any such income or revenue or with respect to expenses incurred by Owner in its use and operation of the Easement Premises; provided, however, parking within the Public Parking by the general public shall be free of charge and Owner shall not charge any fee for the use of the Public Parking pursuant to this Agreement. Section 3.2 Signage. Owner shall install and maintain a prominent, permanent “Public Parking” sign at or near each vehicular entrance to the Public Parking Area, which such signage shall be subject to the City’s prior written approval, not to be unreasonably, or delayed. Owner shall also install and maintain in the main lobby or foyer of the Minimum Improvements a permanent placard (to be no smaller than approximately 8 1/2 by 11 inches) which states that the Public Parking is provided in partnership with the City and the Authority. The final design and wording of such placard shall be subject to the prior reasonable approval of the City Manager. Section 3.3 Waste, Nuisance, Damage, Disfigurement or Injury to Easement Premises. Neither the City nor Owner shall knowingly or willfully commit or suffer to be committed any waste or damage in or upon the Easement Premises, or any disfigurement or injury to any improvements hereafter erected or located upon the Easement Premises, or any part thereof, or the fixtures and/or equipment thereof. Owner, in its use and occupancy of the Easement Premises, shall not knowingly and willfully commit or suffer to be committed any act or thing which constitutes a nuisance. Usual and normal wear and tear, damage by the elements, unavoidable casualty or depreciation and diminution over time shall not be considered “waste,” “nuisance,” “damage, “disfigurement,” or “injury.” Section 3.4 Owner’s Reservation of Certain Rights. The City’s easement rights under this Agreement shall be subject to the following reservations, as well as the other applicable provisions contained in this Agreement: (a) Owner reserves the right to close-off any portion of the Easement Premises for such reasonable period of time as may be legally necessary, in the opinion of Owner’s counsel, to prevent the acquisition of prescriptive rights by anyone; provided, however, that prior to closing-off any portion of the Easement Premises, Owner shall give as much written notice as reasonably practicable of its intention to do so. (b) Owner reserves the right at any time and from time to time to exclude and restrain any private party from access to the Public Parking for cause and on a non- discriminatory basis. (c) Owner reserves the right to temporarily erect or place barriers in and around 4 4842-6565-2420\3 areas on the Easement Premises which are being constructed and/or repaired in order to ensure either safety of persons or protection of property. (d) Owner reserves the right to adopt and enforce reasonable rules and regulations for the safe, efficient, and orderly use and operation of the Easement Premises, so long as such rules and regulations are applied on a non-discriminatory basis, do not adversely impact the City’s or the public’s rights to use of the Easement Premises as set forth in this Agreement, and are mutually agreed to by Owner and the City Manager. By way of example and not limitation, Owner may: (i) designate a reasonable number of parking stalls within the Public Parking for short-term parking (e.g., 15 minute parking for delivery and pick-up in connection with the retail elements of the Minimum Improvements) taking into consideration the types of and needs of the retail tenants occupying the Minimum Improvements; (ii) establish a maximum number of hours a vehicle can be parked in an individual parking stall within the Public Parking of no less than two hours (other than the short-term stalls designated pursuant to in clause (i) above), and reserve the right, by posted notice, to cause a vehicle exceeding such maximum parking time to be removed from the Public Parking at the expense of the vehicle’s owner; (iii) establish reasonable hours of operation of the Public Parking which are less than 24 hours per day, taking into consideration the residents of the residential element of the Minimum Improvements and the types of and needs of the retail tenants occupying the Minimum Improvements; (iv) prohibit overnight parking except by residents and/or guests of the residential element of the Minimum Improvements; (v) prohibit the passage or parking of any recreational vehicles, campers, extended cab trailers or vans, tractors, trailers, buses and/or any other vehicles of a shape, size or weight that would interfere with the parking circulation of other vehicles within the Public Parking or that would exceed the design capability of the Public Parking. ARTICLE IV MAINTENANCE OF THE EASEMENT PREMISES Section 4.1 Maintenance. At all times during the term hereof, Owner, at its cost and expense, shall keep and maintain the Easement Premises and the other Minimum Improvements in good condition and repair in a first-class manner, similar to that of other structured parking facilities located within other first-class, multi-use projects in the Minneapolis-Saint Paul metropolitan area, which such maintenance shall include, without limitation, the following: (a) all repairs, replacements, renewals, alterations, additions and betterments thereto, interior and exterior, structural and non-structural, ordinary and extraordinary, and 5 4842-6565-2420\3 foreseen and unforeseen, all as may be necessary to keep the Easement Premises and the other Minimum Improvements in the condition and repair required by this Agreement, and which are consistent with the requirements of the Final Development Plan, Development Contract and the Contract, and which do not adversely impact the City’s or the public’s rights to use of the Easement Premises as set forth in this Agreement; (b) maintaining all drive and parking surfaces in a smooth and evenly-covered condition, which maintenance work shall include cleaning, sweeping, restriping, repairing and resurfacing the same; (c) maintaining in good working order (including cleaning and painting as necessary), repairing, and replacing as necessary the Access Premises; (d) maintaining in good working order, repairing, and replacing as necessary all ventilation and mechanical systems; (e) maintaining in good working order, repairing, and replacing as necessary any automated parking system; (f) maintaining in good working order, repairing, and replacing as necessary all domestic water, sewer, storm water, gas, electricity, power, heat, telephone, other communications service, commercially reasonable security and life safety systems, and any and all other utility or similar services used, rendered, or supplied, upon, at, from, or in connection with the Easement Premises; (g) periodic removal of all papers, debris, filth, refuse, ice and snow, provided all sweeping shall be at appropriate intervals during such times as shall not unreasonably interfere with the use of the Easement Premises; (h) placing, keeping in repair, replacing and repainting any appropriate directional signs or markers, within or associated with the Easement Premises; (i) operating, keeping in repair, cleaning and replacing when necessary such Easement Premises lighting facilities as may be reasonably required, including without limitation all lighting necessary or appropriate for security of the Public Parking; Section 4.2 No Obligation of the City to Repair or Maintain. The City shall have no obligation of any kind, expressed or implied, to repair, rebuild, restore, reconstruct, modify, alter, replace, or maintain the Easement Premises or any part thereof. ARTICLE V UTILITIES Section 5.1 Utility Charges. During the term of this Agreement, Owner shall pay, or cause to be paid, when the same become due, all charges for water, sewer usage, storm water, gas, electricity, power, heat, telephone, or other communications service and any and all other utility or similar services used, rendered, supplied, or consumed in, upon, at, from, or in connection with 6 4842-6565-2420\3 the Easement Premises, or any part thereof. ARTICLE VI TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS Section 6.1 Payment of Taxes and Assessments. Owner shall pay, or cause to be paid, before becoming delinquent, all real estate taxes, charges, assessments, and levies, assessed and levied by any governmental taxing authority during the term of this Agreement against the Easement Premises and other Minimum Improvements. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall require Owner to pay any franchise, estate, inheritance, excise, succession, capital levy, or transfer tax of the City or any income, excess profits or revenue tax payable by the City under this Agreement. Subject to the terms of the Contract, Owner shall have the right and option, at any time but solely at Owner’s expense, to pay any real estate taxes or assessments in installments or under protest or in a similar manner, or to contest the levy or amount of the same in appropriate legal or administrative proceedings. ARTICLE VII INDEMNIFICATION, INSURANCE Section 7.1 Indemnification of the City. Except to the extent caused by the willful misconduct or negligence of the City, its employees or agents, or the general public, or arising out of the default by the City and its officers, employees or agents, of obligations made pursuant to a contract with Owner, including this Agreement, Owner hereby covenants and agrees to assume and to permanently indemnify and save harmless the City and its employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, damages, costs, expenses, reasonable attorneys’ fees, and liability in connection with the loss of life, personal injury and/or damage to property, to the extent arising from or out of the design or initial construction, maintenance and operation of the Easement Premises, or in connection with the use or occupancy of the Easement Premises, or any part thereof, by Owner, or to the extent arising out of the breach of Owner’s obligations hereunder. Section 7.2 Property Insurance. At all times during the term hereof, Owner, at its sole cost and expense, shall keep the Easement Premises and the other Minimum Improvements, and all alterations, extensions, and improvements thereto and replacements thereof, insured, in the amount of the full replacement cost thereof and with such deductibles as Owner deems appropriate, against loss or damage by fire and against those casualties covered by extended coverage insurance and against vandalism and malicious mischief and against such other risks, of a similar or dissimilar nature, as are customarily covered with respect to improvements similar in construction, general location, use, and occupancy to such improvements. Section 7.3 Personal Property. All property of every kind and character which Owner may keep or store in, at, upon, or about the Easement Premises shall be kept and stored at the sole risk, cost, and expense of Owner. Section 7.4 Liability Insurance. During the term of this Agreement, Owner shall procure and maintain continuously in effect (or shall cause the same to occur), the following policies of 7 4842-6565-2420\3 insurance of the kind and minimum amounts as are customarily maintained with respect to parking facilities and improvements similar to those located on the Easement Premises, at commercially reasonable coverage levels, to be reviewed from time to time by Owner: (a) insurance against liability (including passenger elevator liability) for injuries to or death of any person or damage to or loss of property arising out of or in any way relating to the use, occupancy, or condition of the Easement Premises, or any part thereof, including insuring the indemnification obligations set forth in Section 7.1 above, which such insurance shall provide that the City is an additional insured; (b) garage keepers’ liability insurance including coverage for: (i) Fire and explosion; (ii) Theft (of entire vehicle); and (iii) Riot, civil commotion, malicious mischief, and vandalism. Section 7.5 General Insurance Requirement. All insurance required in this Agreement shall be placed with financially sound and reputable insurers licensed to transact business in the State of Minnesota. Owner shall promptly following the City’s request therefor, furnish the City with copies of policies evidencing all such insurance or a certificate or certificates of the respective insurers stating that such insurance is in force and effect. Each policy of insurance herein required shall contain a provision that the insurer shall not cancel it without giving written notice to the City at least 10 days before the cancellation becomes effective. The insurance coverage herein required may be provided by a blanket insurance policy or policies. Section 7.6 No Obligation of the City for Insurance. At no time and under no circumstances shall the City be required to take out, maintain in force and effect, or pay for any type of insurance coverage with reference to the protection of and/or ownership of and/or occupancy of and/or a suit relating to the Easement Premises and/or any improvements hereafter located thereon. ARTICLE VIII ASSIGNMENT Section 8.1 Assignment by the City. During the term of this Agreement, the City may not assign or transfer its interest under this Agreement without the prior written consent of Owner. Section 8.2 Assignment by Owner. Owner may assign or otherwise transfer its interest under this Agreement in connection with any sale or transfer of the Minimum Improvements. The City shall recognize and approve any successors or assigns of Owner. ARTICLE IX CASUALTY 8 4842-6565-2420\3 Section 9.1 Destruction. In the event that all or any part of the Easement Premises and/or other portions of the Minimum Improvements are destroyed by fire or other casualty, and subject to a determination by the relevant mortgage lender, Owner shall promptly rebuild, reconstruct and/or restore the same to the extent insurance proceeds are available or, in the event insurance proceeds are not sufficient to reconstruct the same, to the extent insurance proceeds combined with any contributions by Owner toward reconstruction are available. ARTICLE X EMINENT DOMAIN Section 10.1 Major Condemnation. If all of the Easement Premises is taken, acquired, or condemned by eminent domain for any public or quasi-public use or purpose, this Agreement shall terminate as of the date of vesting of title in the condemning authority. Each party shall make its own claim in the condemnation proceeding based upon the value of its respective interest in the Easement Premises. ARTICLE XI DEFAULT AND REMEDIES Section 11.1 Default by Owner. If Owner fails to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement, and fails to cure such default after 30 days’ written notice of such default or, if such default cannot reasonably be cured within such 30 days, fails to commence curative action and thereafter diligently complete the same, then, in such case, the City may pursue all available remedies at law and in equity. ARTICLE XII MISCELLANEOUS Section 12.1 Waiver. The waiver by any party hereto of any breach or default of any provisions anywhere contained in this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach or default thereof. No provision of this Agreement shall be deemed to have been waived by any party hereto unless such waiver is in writing and signed by the party charged with any such waiver. Section 12.2 Amendments. Except as otherwise herein provided, and not otherwise, no subsequent alteration, amendment, change, waiver, discharge, termination, deletion, or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon either party unless in writing and signed by both parties. Owner and the City agree to join in and consent to amendments to this Agreement, to the extent such amendments are reasonably required by Owner’s relevant mortgage lender encumbering the Easement Premises, provided; however, that Owner and the City shall not be required to enter into any amendment which does not adequately protect the legitimate interest and security of the Authority or the City with respect to the redevelopment of the Redevelopment Area as contemplated in the Contract. Section 12.3 Joinder; Permitted Encumbrance. Except for the mortgagee consent 9 4842-6565-2420\3 attached hereto, this Agreement does not require the joinder or approval of any other person and each of the parties respectfully has the full, unrestricted and exclusive legal right and power to enter into this Agreement for the term and upon the provisions herein recited and for the use and purposes hereinabove set forth. This Agreement shall constitute a permitted encumbrance under any loan agreement heretofore or hereafter entered into between Owner and any construction lender or permanent lender. Section 12.4 Dedication. Nothing contained in this Agreement will be deemed to be a gift or dedication of any portion of the Easement Premises to the general public, except as explicitly set forth in this Agreement. Section 12.5 Notices. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, a notice, demand or other communication under this Agreement by any party to any other shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is (a) dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, (b) sent by recognized overnight courier (such as Federal Express), or (c) delivered personally, as follows: In the case of Owner: Orion 4500 France, LLC Attn: Ted Carlson 4530 West 77th Street, Suite 365 Edina, MN 55435 In the case of the City: City of Edina Attn: City Manager 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 with a copy to: Dorsey & Whitney LLP Attn: Jay Lindgren 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address with respect to any such party as that party may, from time to time, designate in writing and forward to the other, as provided in this Section. Section 12.6 No Third Party Beneficiary. This Agreement is not intended to give or confer any benefits, rights, privileges, claims, action or remedies to any person or entity. Section 12.7 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. Section 12.8 Law Governing. This Agreement will be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. Section 12.9 Consents and Approvals. In all cases where consents or approvals are required hereunder, such consents or approvals shall not be unreasonably conditioned, delayed or withheld. All consents or approvals shall be in writing in order to be effective. 10 4842-6565-2420\3 Section 12.10 No Additional Waiver Implied by One Waiver. If any agreement contained in this Agreement should be breached by any party and thereafter waived by another party, such waiver shall be limited to the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive any other concurrent, previous or subsequent breach hereunder. Section 12.11 Survival. The easements granted hereby and each reservation, covenant, condition and restriction contained in this Agreement will run with the land and will be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, as the case may be, Owner and the City and their respective successors and assigns. Section 12.12 Subdivision. The parties acknowledge that the Redevelopment Area may be subdivided by a Registered Land Survey. Following such subdivision, the fee owner of any portion of the Redevelopment Area may prepare an amendment to this Agreement to (i) confirm those parcels of the Redevelopment Area which are burdened or benefitted by the terms and condition of this Agreement, and (ii) release all other parcels of the Redevelopment Area from the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Such owner shall deliver the amendment to the all other fee owners of the Redevelopment Area and to the City for execution, and all other fee owners of the Redevelopment Area and the City shall promptly execute and acknowledge the amendment and return it to the fee owner that prepared the amendment for recording against title to the Redevelopment Area. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature pages follow] [Signature Page to Parking Easement Agreement (4500 France)] 4842-6565-2420\3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. CITY: CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: ___________________, Mayor By: ___________________, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of ____________, 2020, by ____________ and ____________, the Mayor and City Manager respectively, of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of the City. Notary Public [Signature Page to Parking Easement Agreement (4500 France)] 4842-6565-2420\3 OWNER: ORION 4500 FRANCE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: Orion Investments Edina II, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company Its: Manager By: Name: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of ___________, 2020, by ______________________, the _________________ of ORION INVESTMENTS EDINA II, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, as the manager of ORION 4500 FRANCE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability companies. Notary Public A-1 [Exhibit A to Parking Easement Agreement (4500 France)] 4842-6565-2420\3 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Redevelopment Area Real property in the City of Edina, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, described as follows: Parcel 1: Lots 1 and 2 and that part of Lot 6 described as follows: Commencing at the most Northerly corner of said Lot 6; thence South along the East line of said lot; 40.62 feet; thence Northwesterly 30.2 feet to a point on the Northerly line of said Lot 6, distant 27.19 feet Westerly from the point of beginning; thence Northeasterly to the point of beginning, all in Block 2, "Fairbairn's Rearrangement" in Waveland and Waveland Park, including all of the vacated alley which lies North of the South line of said Lot 2 extended West, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Abstract property) Parcel 2: Lots 3, 4 and 5; That part of Lot 6, described as follows: Commencing on the Easterly line of said Lot at a point distant 40.62 feet Southerly from the most Northerly corner of said Lot, thence Northwesterly 30.2 feet to a point on the Northwesterly line of said Lot distant 27.19 feet Southwesterly from the most Northerly corner of said Lot; thence Southwesterly along the Northwesterly line of said Lot to the most Westerly corner of said Lot, thence Southeasterly along the Southwesterly line of said Lot to the most Southerly corner of said Lot, thence Northerly along the Easterly line of said Lot to the point of beginning; That part of the alley now vacated, described as follows: Commencing at the point of intersection of the center line of alley, now vacated with the North line of Lot 3 extended Westward, thence East on said extended line to the Northwest corner of said Lot 3, thence along the Easterly line of said alley to the most Southerly corner of Lot 5, thence Southwesterly along an extension of the Southeasterly line of said Lot to the center line of said alley, thence Northwesterly along the center line of said alley to a point of its intersection with a line erected to bisect the angle existing in the Westerly line of said alley, thence Southwest along said line to the West line of said alley, thence North along said West line to a point in said line 40.62 feet South of the most Northerly corner of Lot 6, the same being the point of intersection to said West line of alley with the extension Westward of the North line of Lot 3, thence East along said extended line to the point of beginning; All in Block 2, "Fairbairn's Rearrangement" in Waveland and Waveland Park. Hennepin County, Minnesota (Torrens property, Certificate of Title No. 1474225) Parcel 3: Lot 7, Block 2, Fairbairn's Rearrangement in Waveland and Waveland Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota. A-2 [Exhibit A to Parking Easement Agreement (4500 France)] 4842-6565-2420\3 Together with that part of the adjacent vacated alley that accrued thereto by reason of the vacation thereof. (Abstract property) Parcel 4: Lot 8, Block 2, Fairbairn's Rearrangement in Waveland and Waveland Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota less and except that portion described as commencing at the most westerly corner of said Lot 8; thence on an assumed bearing of North 47 degrees 35 minutes 29 seconds East, along the northerly line of said Lot 8, a distance of 12.00 feet; thence South 33 degrees 43 minutes 44 seconds East, parallel with the west line of said Lot 8, a distance of 75.00 feet; thence South 47 degrees 35 minutes 29 seconds West, parallel with said northerly line of Lot 8, a distance of 12.00 feet, to said west line of Lot 8; thence North 33 degrees 43 minutes 44 seconds West, along said west line of Lot 8, a distance of 75.00 feet to the point of beginning. (Abstract property) B-1-1 [Exhibit B-1 to Parking Easement Agreement (4500 France)] 4842-6565-2420\3 EXHIBIT B-1 Legal Description of the Public Parking An easement over, under and across that part of Block 2 and the vacated alley in Block 2, Fairbairn's Rearrangement in Waveland and Waveland Park, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as commencing at the southeast corner of said Block 2; thence on an assumed bearing of South 49 degrees 28 minutes 10 seconds West along the southerly line of said Block 2 a distance of 78.22 feet; thence North 42 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 45.70 feet; thence South 48 degrees 02 minutes 38 seconds West 33.96 feet; thence North 42 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 8.68 feet; thence South 48 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 1.00 foot; thence North 42 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 10.72 feet; thence North 48 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East 12.33 feet; thence North 42 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 8.64 feet; thence South 48 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 19.48 feet; thence North 42 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 100.08 feet to the northerly line of said Block 2; thence North 47 degrees 35 minutes 29 seconds East along said northerly line of Block 2 a distance of 123.35 feet; thence South 42 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East 39.44 feet; thence South 48 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 14.67 feet; thence South 42 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East 15.03 feet; thence North 48 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East 14.67 feet; thence South 42 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East 118.89 feet to the east line of said Block 2; thence South 00 degrees 05 minutes 29 seconds West 4.55 feet along said east line to the point of beginning. B-2-1 [Exhibit B-2 to Parking Easement Agreement (4500 France)] 4842-6565-2420\3 EXHIBIT B-2 Depiction of the Parking Area [See attached.] B-2-2 [Exhibit B-2 to Parking Easement Agreement (4500 France)] 4842-6565-2420\3 4842-6565-2420\3 CONSENT AND SUBORDINATION The undersigned, Bremer Bank, National Association, a national banking association, holder of that certain Mortgage, Security Agreement, Fixture Financing Statement and Assignment of Leases and Rents executed by Orion 4500 France, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, dated July 1, 2019, filed July 15, 2019, as Document No. A10678911, in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and filed July 8, 2019, as Document No. T05626060, in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota (the “Mortgage”), hereby consents to the foregoing Parking Easement Agreement (4500 France) (the “Easement Agreement”), and hereby subjects and subordinates the Mortgage and all of its right, title and interest in and to the Easement Agreement. Bremer Bank, National Association, a national banking association By: Name: Title: STATE OF ______________ ) ) ss. COUNTY O F ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of ___________, 2020, by ____________________, the _________________ of Bremer Bank, National Association, a national banking association, on behalf of the association. Notary Public SIDEWALK EASEMENT AGREEMENT (4500 France) THIS SIDEWALK EASEMENT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into this ___ day of __________, 2020 (“Effective Date”), by and between ORION 4500 FRANCE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Owner”), and the CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota statutory city (the “City”). RECITALS: Owner is the owner of the real property legally described on Exhibit A attachedA. hereto and incorporated herein (the “Property”). The Property is subject to that certain Redevelopment Agreement by and amongB. Owner, City and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”), dated December 18, 2018 (as amended, the “Contract”). Pursuant to the Contract, Owner has agreed to grant the City an easement over,C. upon and across the surface of that portion of the Property legally described on the attached Exhibit B-1 and depicted on the attached Exhibit B-2 (the “Sidewalk Property”) for sidewalk and public access purposes, on the terms and conditions provided in this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the others as follows: Easement Premises. Owner hereby grants and conveys to the City, for the benefit1. of the City and the general public a non-exclusive, perpetual public easement over, across, upon and through the Sidewalk Property, together with and including all (a) surface improvements now or hereafter located thereon, including, without limitation, all paving, sidewalks, pathways, retaining walls, and other hardscapes and (b) all amenities, components, and fixtures now or hereafter located thereon, including, without limitation, all transit stops, benches, trash receptacles, and landscaping, (collectively, the “Easement Premises”), for the purpose of the 1 4845-8912-6591\45 general public utilizing the Easement Premises and its components for their respective intended purposes, including for the passage and access of pedestrians, in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Owner hereby reserves the right to (i) place within the Easement Premises moveable patio furniture and fixtures such as tables, chairs, umbrellas, heat lamps, lighting, planters and segmented fencing and similar items used for temporary patio purposes, so long as the foregoing items do not materially impair the free flow of pedestrian passage and access across and through the Easement Premises; and (ii) maintain, repair and replace permanent improvements which may incidentally encroach into the Easement Premises so long as such improvements do not materially impair the free flow of pedestrian access and passage. Term. The easements granted hereby, and each reservation, covenant, condition2. and restriction contained in this Agreement, shall be effective as of the date hereof, shall be perpetual, and shall remain in effect until affirmatively released by the City. Such release shall be evidenced by the recording of a release or termination of this Agreement in the real estate records of Hennepin County, Minnesota, at which time this Agreement shall terminate, subject to reconciliation of expenses and obligations incurred through the date of release or termination and the continuation of those provisions that specifically survive termination of this Agreement, and the Easement Premises shall thereafter belong to and be under the sole control of Owner. Operation and Control of Easement Premises. During the term of this Agreement,3. Owner shall operate the Easement Premises for sidewalk and public access purposes and other related or incidental purposes consistent with Section 1 above and in accordance with this Agreement and all applicable governmental laws, ordinances, regulations and orders, at Owner’s sole cost and expense. Maintenance. At all times during the term hereof, Owner, at its cost and expense,4. shall keep and maintain the Easement Premises in good condition and repair, which such maintenance shall include, without limitation, the following: all repairs, replacements, renewals, alterations, additions and betterments(a) thereto, as may be necessary to keep the Easement Premises in the condition and repair required by this Agreement, and which do not impair the City’s or the public’s rights to use of the Easement Premises as set forth in this Agreement; the maintenance of all pedestrian surfaces to a smooth and evenly-covered(b) condition, which obligation includes, without limitation, the cleaning, sweeping, repairing and resurfacing of such pedestrian surfaces; periodic removal of all papers, debris, filth, refuse, ice and snow, provided(c) all sweeping shall be at appropriate intervals during such times as shall not unreasonably interfere with the use of the Easement Premises; maintaining and replacing all landscaping and other vegetation;(d) placing, keeping in repair, replacing and repainting any appropriate(e) directional signs or markers within or associated with the Easement Premises; and 2 4845-8912-6591\45 operating, keeping in repair, cleaning and replacing when necessary such(f) Easement Premises lighting facilities as may be reasonably required to reasonably illuminate the Easement Premises, including, without limitation, all lighting within the Easement Premises. No Obligation of the City to Repair or Maintain. The City shall have no obligation5. of any kind, expressed or implied, to repair, rebuild, restore, reconstruct, modify, alter, replace, or maintain the Easement Premises or any part thereof. Payment of Taxes and Assessments. Owner shall pay, or cause to be paid, before6. becoming delinquent, all real estate taxes, charges, assessments, and levies, assessed and levied by any governmental taxing authority during the term of this Agreement against the Easement Premises. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall require Owner to pay any franchise, estate, inheritance, excise, succession, capital levy, or transfer tax of the City or any income, excess profits or revenue tax payable by the City under this Agreement. Subject to the terms of the Contract so long as the same remains in effect, Owner shall have the right and option, at any time but solely at Owner’s expense, to pay any real estate taxes or assessments in installments or under protest or in a similar manner, or to contest the levy or amount of the same in appropriate legal or administrative proceedings. Indemnification and Insurance.7. Indemnification of the City. Except to the extent caused by the willful(a) misconduct or negligence of the City, its employees or agents, or the general public, or arising out of the default by the City and its officers, employees or agents of obligations made pursuant to a contract with Owner, including this Agreement, Owner hereby covenants and agrees to assume and to indemnify and save harmless the City and its employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, damages, costs, expenses, reasonable attorneys’ fees, and liability in connection with the loss of life, personal injury and/or damage to property, to the extent arising from or out of the design or initial construction, maintenance and operation of the Easement Premises, or in connection with the use or occupancy of the Easement Premises, or any part thereof, by Owner, or to the extent arising out of the breach of Owner’s obligations hereunder. Property Insurance. At all times during the term hereof, Owner, at its sole(b) cost and expense, shall keep the Easement Premises and all alterations, extensions, and improvements thereto and replacements thereof, insured, in the amount of the full replacement cost thereof and with such deductibles as Owner deems appropriate, against loss or damage by fire and against those casualties covered by extended coverage insurance and against vandalism and malicious mischief and against such other risks, of a similar or dissimilar nature, as are customarily covered with respect to improvements similar in construction, general location, use, and occupancy to such improvements. Liability Insurance. During the term of this Agreement, Owner shall(c) procure and maintain continuously in effect (or shall cause the same to occur), the following policies of insurance of the kind and minimum amounts as are customarily maintained with respect to facilities and improvements similar to those located on the 3 4845-8912-6591\45 Easement Premises, at commercially reasonable coverage levels, to be reviewed from time to time by Owner: insurance against liability for injuries to or death of any person or damage to or loss of property arising out of or in any way relating to the use, occupancy, or condition of the Easement Premises, or any part thereof, including insuring the indemnification obligations set forth in Section 7.1 above. Such insurance shall provide that the City is an additional insured. General Insurance Requirement. All insurance required in this Agreement(d) shall be placed with financially sound and reputable insurers licensed to transact business in the State of Minnesota. Upon written request of the City, Owner shall furnish the City with a certificate or certificates of the respective insurers stating that such insurance is in force and effect. The insurance coverage herein required may be provided by a blanket insurance policy or policies. Casualty and Condemnation. In the event that all or any part of the Easement8. Premises are destroyed by fire or other casualty, and subject to a determination by the relevant mortgage lender, Owner shall promptly rebuild, reconstruct and/or restore the same to the extent insurance proceeds are available or, in the event insurance proceeds are not sufficient to reconstruct and/or restore the same, to the extent insurance proceeds combined with any contributions by Owner toward reconstruction are available. If all of the Easement Premises is taken, acquired, or condemned by eminent domain for any public or quasi-public use or purpose, this Agreement shall terminate as of the date of vesting of title in the condemning authority. Each party shall make its own claim in the condemnation proceeding based upon the value of its respective interest in the Easement Premises. Default By Owner. If Owner fails to perform any of its obligations under this9. Agreement, and fails to cure such default after 30 days’ written notice of such failure or, if such failure cannot reasonably be cured within such 30 days, fails to commence curative action and thereafter diligently complete the same, then, in such case, the City may pursue all available remedies at law and in equity, including curing such failure on behalf of Owner and Owner shall pay to the City all costs in incurred by the City on account thereof within 30 days after demand thereof by the City. If Owner fails to make payment within such 30-day period, the City may assess such costs incurred to all or any portion of the Property as a service charge pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.101, or any successor statute. Miscellaneous. 10. Waiver. The waiver by any party hereto of any breach or default of any(a) provisions anywhere contained in this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach or default thereof. No provision of this Agreement shall be deemed to have been waived by any party hereto unless such waiver is in writing and signed by the party charged with any such waiver. Amendments. Except as otherwise herein provided, and not otherwise, no(b) subsequent alteration, amendment, change, waiver, discharge, termination, deletion, or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon either party unless in writing and signed by both parties. 4 4845-8912-6591\45 Joinder; Permitted Encumbrance. Except for the mortgagee consent(c) attached hereto, this Agreement does not require the joinder or approval of any other person and each of the parties respectfully has the full, unrestricted and exclusive legal right and power to enter into this Agreement for the term and upon the provisions herein recited and for the use and purposes hereinabove set forth. Dedication. Nothing contained in this Agreement will be deemed to be a(d) gift or dedication of any portion of the Easement Premises to the general public. Notices. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, a(e) notice, demand or other communication under this Agreement by any party to any other shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is (a) dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, (b) sent by recognized overnight courier (such as Federal Express), or (c) delivered personally, as follows: In the case of Owner: Orion 4500 France, LLC Attn: Ted Carlson 4530 West 77th Street, Suite 365 Edina, MN 55435 In the case of the City:City of Edina Attn: City Manager 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 or at such other address with respect to any such party as that party may, from time to time, designate in writing and forward to the other, as provided in this Section. No Third Party Beneficiary. This Agreement is not intended to give or(f) confer any benefits, rights, privileges, claims, action or remedies to any person or entity. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of(g) counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. Law Governing. This Agreement will be governed and construed in(h) accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. Consents and Approvals. In all cases where consents or approvals are(i) required hereunder, such consents or approvals shall not be unreasonably conditioned, delayed or withheld. All consents or approvals shall be in writing in order to be effective. No Additional Waiver Implied by One Waiver. If any agreement contained(j) in this Agreement should be breached by any party and thereafter waived by another party, such waiver shall be limited to the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive any other concurrent, previous or subsequent breach hereunder. Survival. The easements granted hereby and each reservation, covenant, condition11. and restriction contained in this Agreement will run with the land and will be binding upon, and 5 4845-8912-6591\45 inure to the benefit of, as the case may be, Owner and the City and their respective successors and assigns. Subdivision. The parties acknowledge that the Property may be subdivided by a12. Registered Land Survey. Following such subdivision, the fee owner of any portion of the Property may prepare an amendment to this Agreement to (i) confirm those parcels of the Property which are burdened or benefitted by the terms and condition of this Agreement, and (ii) release all other parcels of the Property from the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Such owner shall deliver the amendment to the all other fee owners of the Property and the City for execution, and all other fee owners of the Property and the City shall promptly execute and acknowledge the amendment and return it to the fee owner that prepared the amendment for recording against title to the Property. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature pages follow] 6 4845-8912-6591\45 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. OWNER: ORION 4500 FRANCE, LLC a Minnesota limited liability company By:Orion Investments Edina II, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company Its:Manager By: Name: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 2020, by ______________________, the _________________ of ORION INVESTMENTS EDINA II, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, as the Manager of ORION 4500 FRANCE, LLC,a Delaware limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability companies. Notary Public 7 [Signature Page to Sidewalk Easement Agreement (4500 France)] 4845-8912-6591\45 CITY: CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota statutory city By: Its: Mayor By: Its: City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of ______________, 2020, by ______________________, and _______________________, the Mayor and City Manager, respectively, of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of the city. Notary Public THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Dorsey & Whitney LLP 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 8 [Signature Page to Sidewalk Easement Agreement (4500 France)] 4845-8912-6591\45 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Property Parcel 1: Lots 1 and 2 and that part of Lot 6 described as follows: Commencing at the most Northerly corner of said Lot 6; thence South along the East line of said lot; 40.62 feet; thence Northwesterly 30.2 feet to a point on the Northerly line of said Lot 6, distant 27.19 feet Westerly from the point of beginning; thence Northeasterly to the point of beginning, all in Block 2, “Fairbairn’s Rearrangement” in Waveland and Waveland Park, including all of the vacated alley which lies North of the South line of said Lot 2 extended West, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Abstract Property) Parcel 2: Lots 3, 4 and 5; That part of Lot 6, described as follows: Commencing on the Easterly line of said Lot at a point distant 40.62 feet Southerly from the most Northerly corner of said Lot, thence Northwesterly 30.2 feet to a point on the Northwesterly line of said Lot distant 27.19 feet Southwesterly from the most Northerly corner of said Lot; thence Southwesterly along the Northwesterly line of said Lot to the most Westerly corner of said Lot, thence Southeasterly along the Southwesterly line of said Lot to the most Southerly corner of said Lot, thence Northerly along the Easterly line of said Lot to the point of beginning; That part of the alley now vacated, described as follows: Commencing at the point of intersection of the center line of alley, now vacated with the North line of Lot 3 extended Westward, thence East on said extended line to the Northwest corner of said Lot 3, thence along the Easterly line of said alley to the most Southerly corner of Lot 5, thence Southwesterly along an extension of the Southeasterly line of said Lot to the center line of said alley, thence Northwesterly along the center line of said alley to a point of its intersection with a line erected to bisect the angle existing in the Westerly line of said alley, thence Southwest along said line to the West line of said alley, thence North along said West line to a point in said line 40.62 feet South of the most Northerly corner of Lot 6, the same being the point of intersection to said West line of alley with the extension Westward of the North line of Lot 3, thence East along said extended line to the point of beginning; All in Block 2, "Fairbairn's Rearrangement" In Waveland And Waveland Park (Torrens Property) Parcel 3: Lot 7, Block 2, Fairbairn's Rearrangement in Waveland and Waveland Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 9 [Exhibit A to Sidewalk Easement Agreement (4500 France)] 4845-8912-6591\45 Together with that part of the adjacent vacated alley that accrued thereto by reason of the vacation thereof. (Abstract property) Parcel 4: Lot 8, Block 2, Fairbairn's Rearrangement in Waveland and Waveland Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota less and except that portion described as commencing at the most westerly corner of said Lot 8; thence on an assumed bearing of North 47 degrees 35 minutes 29 seconds East, along the northerly line of said Lot 8, a distance of 12.00 feet; thence South 33 degrees 43 minutes 44 seconds East, parallel with the west line of said Lot 8, a distance of 75.00 feet; thence South 47 degrees 35 minutes 29 seconds West, parallel with said northerly line of Lot 8, a distance of 12.00 feet, to said west line of Lot 8; thence North 33 degrees 43 minutes 44 seconds West, along said west line of Lot 8, a distance of 75.00 feet to the point of beginning. (Abstract property) 10 [Exhibit A to Sidewalk Easement Agreement (4500 France)] 4845-8912-6591\45 EXHIBIT B-1 Easement Premises Legal Description of the Sidewalk Property An easement over and across that part of Block 2, Fairbairn's Rearrangement in Waveland and Waveland Park, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as commencing at the most westerly corner of Lot 8, said Block 2; thence on an assumed bearing of North 47 degrees 35 minutes 29 seconds East, along the northerly line of said Block 2, a distance of 52.05 feet to the point of beginning of the easement to be described; thence continuing North 47 degrees 35 minutes 29 seconds East 260.25 feet; thence southeasterly 18.49 feet along a nontangential curve concave to the south, to the east line of said Block 2, having a radius of 25.00 feet, a central angle of 42 degrees 22 minutes 03 seconds and the chord of said curve bears South 57 degrees 36 minutes 46 seconds East; thence South 00 degrees 05 minutes 29 seconds West, along said east line of said Block 2, a distance of 216.02 feet to the southeast corner of said Block 2; thence South 49 degrees 28 minutes 10 seconds West, along the southerly line of said Block 2, a distance of 13.72 feet; thence North 42 degrees 03 minutes 05 seconds West 24.31 feet; thence North 48 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East 28.02 feet; thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 159.92 feet; thence North 65 degrees 59 minutes 53 seconds West 33.83 feet; thence South 48 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 227.83 feet; thence North 42 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 1.44 feet to the point of beginning. 11 [Exhibit B-1 to Sidewalk Easement Agreement (4500 France)] 4845-8912-6591\45 EXHIBIT B-2 Depiction of the Sidewalk Property [See attached.] 12 [Exhibit B-2 to Sidewalk Easement Agreement (4500 France)] 4845-8912-6591\5 13 [Exhibit B-2 to Sidewalk Easement Agreement (4500 France)] 4845-8912-6591\5 14 [Exhibit B-2 to Sidewalk Easement Agreement (4500 France)] 4845-8912-6591\5 CONSENT AND SUBORDINATION The undersigned, Bremer Bank, National Association, a national banking association (“Mortgagee”), holder of that certain Mortgage, Security Agreement, Fixture Financing Statement and Assignment of Leases and Rents executed by Orion 4500 France, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, dated as of July 1, 2019, and recorded with the Office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota on July 15, 2019 as Document No. A10678911, and filed with the Office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota on July 8, 2019 as Document No. T05626060 (the “Mortgage”), hereby consents to the foregoing Sidewalk Easement Agreement (4500 France) (the “Easement Agreement”), and hereby subjects and subordinates the Mortgage and all of its right, title and interest in and to the Easement Agreement. Bremer Bank, National Association, a national banking association By: Name: Title: STATE OF ______________) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _________, 2020, by ____________________, the _________________ of Bremer Bank, National Association, a national banking association on behalf of the national banking association. Notary Public 15 [Consent and Subordination to Sidewalk Easement Agreement (4500 France)] 4845-8912-6591\45 Document comparison by Workshare Compare on Monday, August 17, 2020 5:30:00 PM Input: Document 1 ID C:\Users\Zach.Sarah\My Documents\ndeloc\Sidewalk Easement Agreement (4500 France).docx Description C:\Users\Zach.Sarah\My Documents\ndeloc\Sidewalk Easement Agreement (4500 France).docx Document 2 ID C:\Users\Zach.Sarah\My Documents\ndeloc\Sidewalk Easement Agreement (1).docx Description C:\Users\Zach.Sarah\My Documents\ndeloc\Sidewalk Easement Agreement (1).docx Rendering set Standard Legend: Insertion Deletion Moved from Moved to Style change Format change Moved deletion Inserted cell Deleted cell Moved cell Split/Merged cell Padding cell Statistics: Count Insertions 29 Deletions 13 Moved from 0 Moved to 0 Style change 0 Format changed 0 Total changes 42 4826-3826-2468\3 RIGHT OF FIRST PURCHASE OPTION AGREEMENT between THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA and ORION 4500 FRANCE, LLC Dated as of ____________, 2020 THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Dorsey & Whitney LLP 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 4826-3826-2468\3 RIGHT OF FIRST PURCHASE OPTION AGREEMENT (4500 France) THIS RIGHT OF FIRST PURCHASE OPTION AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into this ___ day of _____________, 2020 (“Effective Date”), by and between the HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”), and ORION 4500 FRANCE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Owner”). RECITALS: A. The City of Edina, Minnesota, a Minnesota statutory city (the “City”), the Authority, and Owner, as “Developer”, are parties to that certain Redevelopment Agreement dated December 18, 2018 (as amended, the “Contract”). B. The Contract provides for the redevelopment by Owner of certain real property legally described on the attached Exhibit A (referred to herein and in the Contract as the “Redevelopment Area”) and located within the 44th & France 2 Tax Incremental Financing District, established by the Authority pursuant to Resolution No. 2018-100, in coordination with the Authority and with the cooperation and assistance of the City. C. The Contract provides for the expenditure of certain public funds to assist in the redevelopment of the Redevelopment Area with certain “Minimum Improvements” consisting generally of a new 4-story, mixed use project, including an approximately 46-unit apartment building and approximately 6,500 square feet of ground-level restaurant and retail space. D. The Contract requires that at least three of the residential units within the Minimum Improvements (the “Affordable Units”) will be leased at rates that are considered affordable to individuals or households earning less than 50% of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Area Median Income (“AMI”) for the Minneapolis-Saint Paul-Bloomington Metropolitan Statistical Area. E. The Authority and Owner have agreed in the Contract that Owner shall grant the Authority the first right to purchase one or more of the Affordable Units (the “Purchase Right”) in the event the Affordable Units are converted from rental units to for-sale units, as more particularly set forth herein. F. All capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Contract. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the others as follows: 1. Right to Purchase. Upon and subject to the terms hereinafter set forth, Owner hereby grants to the Authority, and the Authority hereby accepts, an option to purchase (“Purchase Option”) one or more of the Affordable Units, together with an undivided interest in all common elements, all easements and rights benefiting or appurtenant to the Affordable Units (collectively, 2 4826-3826-2468\3 the “Property”) upon the occurrence of a For-Sale Conversion (as defined below). The Purchase Option shall terminate only upon the occurrence of either of the following: (a) the Authority issues a Rejection Notice or fails to timely issue an Election Notice, as set forth in Section 3 below; (b) the execution of a written termination by the then-fee title owner of the Property and the Authority; or (c) the 25th anniversary of the Effective Date (the “Term”). 2. For-Sale Conversion. In the event Owner elects to convert (a “For-Sale Conversion”) all or part of the apartment component of the Minimum Improvements from rental units into condominium units, cooperative units, or otherwise subdivide such units into separately transferable and taxable housing units (“Separate Units”), Owner shall include the Affordable Units in such For-Sale Conversion, such that each Affordable Unit into also converted into a Separate Unit. Owner shall give the Authority prompt notice of Owner’s election to proceed with a For-Sale Conversion and the Owner shall give the Authority notice of date (the “Conversion Date”) on which Owner causes the operative documents effectuating the For-Sale Conversion to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota and/or the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, as applicable (e.g., recording of the common interest community declaration and plat, registered land survey, etc.), which such notice shall be delivered to the Authority no later than two business days after the Conversion Date. 3. Election Period. The Authority shall have 120 days after the Conversion Date to notify Owner of the Authority’s desire, in its sole discretion, and subject to approval by the Authority’s board of commissioners, to purchase one or more of the Affordable Units and related Property subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement (the “Election Period”). Prior to the expiration of the Election Period, the Authority shall notify Owner that the Authority either (a) elects to so purchase one or more of the Affordable Units (“Election Notice”) (which such Election Notice will specify which Affordable Units the Authority elects to purchase) or (b) waives it right to purchase one or more of the Affordable Units (“Rejection Notice”). In the event the Authority issues a Rejection Notice or fails to timely issue an Election Notice, then the Purchase Option shall be deemed terminated and of no further force or effect, and Owner shall be free to sell the Affordable Units on terms and conditions acceptable to Owner in its sole discretion. 4. Documents; Inspection. Within 10 days after the Conversion Date, Owner shall either make available to the Authority copies of all documents, reports, studies, tests, drawings, surveys, agreements, contracts, and all other documentation relating to the Property in Owner’s possession or control or to which Owner has knowledge or access (“Property Documents”). During the Election Period (or until the Authority issues a Rejection Notice), the Authority may examine the Property Documents and Owner shall allow the Authority, and the Authority’s employees, agents, and contractors, access to the Property upon reasonable notice from the Authority without charge and for the purpose of the Authority’s reasonable inspection, investigation and testing of the same. 5. Title Examination. Within 15 days after the Conversion Date, Owner shall deliver to the Authority a current commitment (the “Commitment”) for an ALTA Form Owner’s Policy of Title Insurance insuring title to the Property in the amount of the Purchase Price issued by a reputable title company (the “Title Company”), legible copies of all documents cited, raised as exceptions or noted in the title commitment and Owner’s most recent survey of the Redevelopment 3 4826-3826-2468\3 Area (provided, the Authority may elect to obtain a new survey at its sole cost and expense) (collectively [including the new survey if so obtained], the “Title Evidence”). During the Election Period, the Authority may make written objections (“Objections”) to the Title Evidence. All matter shown by the Title Evidence and not objected to by the Authority shall be a “Permitted Encumbrance” hereunder. Owner shall not have any obligation to cure or attempt to cure any Objections which cannot be cured solely by the payment of money, however Owner shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cure the Objections. 6. Purchase Terms. The following provisions are applicable to the Purchase Option: (a) Purchase Price. The purchase price per each Affordable Unit (and related Property) (the “Purchase Price”) purchased by the Authority pursuant to the Purchase Option shall be the lesser of: (i) the amount considered affordable for a household of two at 120% of AMI as of the Conversion Date (“Income Limit”), which such amount shall equal the maximum mortgage financing available for such Affordable Unit where the annual sum of the following “Mortgage Costs” equal 30% of the Income Limit, plus 3.01% of such maximum mortgage financing to adjust for the required equity: (A) principal and interest payments of a first mortgage based on a 30-year, level amortization mortgage loan with a fixed interest rate at the rate published by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (“MHFA”) as of the Conversion Date for the MHFA’s “Step-Up” mortgage program, assuming a 97% loan-to-value ratio, conventional financing under the HFA Preferred™ or HFA Advantage ™ programs, no upfront paid mortgage insurance, and the MHFA 1.5% Service Release Premium rate option, or a comparable rate if the MHFA ceases to exists or ceases to publish such rates; (B) the Affordable Unit’s property taxes as reasonably estimated by the Authority based on the existing tax levy; (C) mortgage insurance (if any) payments which would be allowed by the MHFA in connection with the interest rate program described in clause (A); and (D) market insurance rates for similar units (but excluding homeowner association fees and dues) (the “Affordable Price”); and (ii) the “Fair Market Value” of such Affordable Unit(s), which shall mean the fair market value of the Affordable Unit(s) that an independent third party would be willing to pay for the Affordable Unit(s) in an arm’s length transaction without any compulsion to proceed, which shall be determined as follows: if the parties are unable to agree on the purchase price within 30 days after the Conversion Date, then the Authority and Owner shall each select a qualified MAI appraiser to determine the Fair Market Value for the Affordable Unit(s) within 10 days after said 30-day period. If Owner fails to give notice identifying an appraiser within the time provided, Owner has waived the right to identify an appraiser and the decision of the Authority’s appraiser controls. If two appraisers are selected, they must within 15 days after the selection of the second agree to a third appraiser. If the two appraisers fail to identify the third appraiser within such 15-day period, the either the Authority or Owner may petition the district court (or its equivalent) having jurisdiction over the Property for the appointment of the third appraiser. The three 4 4826-3826-2468\3 appraisers must each, within 30 days after the appointment of the third appraiser, simultaneously deliver to the Authority and Owner their expert opinions of the Fair Market Value in question. The Fair Market Value is the average of the three appraisals unless one appraisal is more than ten percent (10%) greater or lesser than the average of the other two appraisals, in which case that appraisal is disregarded, and the average of the remaining appraisals is the Fair Market Value. Each party must pay the cost of the appraiser selected by it and one-half of the cost of the third appraiser. All appraisers must be disinterested and must have the designation, MAI, SRA or equivalent and must have not less than five years’ experience appraising real estate in the business market wherein the Property is located. The appraisers may, but need not, present formal written appraisals supporting their opinion but must, in any event, certify that the report was conducted in accordance with professional standards. The decision of this appraisal process is binding upon the parties and must not be subject to appeal to a court or other body except based upon fraud. Notwithstanding anything to contrary herein, if the Authority exercises its Purchase Option hereunder during the first 15 years after the Effective Date, then the Authority may, but is not required to, elect the Affordable Price as the Purchaser Price, without the parties making a determination of the Fair Market Value. If the Authority exercises its Purchase Option hereunder after such initial 15-year period, but before the expiration of the Term, Owner may require that the Purchase Price equal the Fair Market Value. (b) Closing. The closing of the purchase and sale pursuant to the Purchase Option (the “Closing”) shall occur no later than 30 days after the Authority issues its Election Notice (the “Closing Date”). Owner agrees to deliver possession of the Property to the Authority on the Closing Date. (c) Owner’s Closing Deliveries. On the Closing Date, Owner shall execute and deliver to the Authority the following, all in form and content reasonably satisfactory to the Authority: (i) a limited warranty deed (the “Deed”) conveying the applicable Property specified in the Election Notice to the Authority subject only to the Permitted Encumbrances; (ii) a non-foreign affidavit, properly executed, containing such information as is required by Internal Revenue Code Section 1445(b)(2) and its regulations; and (iii) such affidavits, certificates or other documents as may be reasonably required by Title Company in order to record the Deed and issue an ALTA Form Owner’s Policy of Title Insurance insuring title to the Property in the amount of the Purchase Price subject only to the Permitted Encumbrances (the “Title Policy”). (d) The Authority’s Closing Deliveries. On the Closing Date, the Authority will execute and/or deliver to Owner the following: (i) Purchase Price; and (ii) such affidavits, certificates or other documents as may be reasonably required by Title Company in order to record the Deed and issue the Title Policy. (e) Prorations. If the Authority issues its Election Notice, Owner and the Authority agree to the following prorations and allocation of costs regarding this Agreement and Property purchased by the Authority: 5 4826-3826-2468\3 (i) Title Charges and Closing Fee. Owner will pay all costs for the Commitment. The Authority will pay all title insurance premiums required for the issuance of the Title Policy, including the cost of all additional endorsements thereto. Owner and the Authority will each pay one-half of any closing fee or charge imposed by Title Company. (ii) Taxes. Owner shall pay all state deed tax or transfer tax or fee payable in connection with this transaction. Special assessments, if any, shall be paid in full by Owner on or before the Closing Date. Real estate taxes shall be prorated as of the Closing Date. Accordingly, Owner shall pay all real estate taxes due and payable up to the Closing Date and the Authority shall pay all real estate taxes due and payable on and after the Closing Date. (iii) Other Income and Expenses. All income (including, without limitation, rents) and other expenses shall be prorated and adjusted as of the Closing Date. (iv) Attorney’s Fees. Each of the parties will pay its own attorney’s fees. (f) Warranties and Representations by Owner. Owner warrants and represents to the Authority as follows: (i) Owner has the requisite power and authority (including all necessary approvals and authorizations) to enter into and perform this Agreement and those closing documents to be signed by it; such documents have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of Owner and have been or will be duly executed and delivered; such execution, delivery and performance by Owner of such documents does not and will not conflict with or result in a violation of any judgment, order, or decree of any court or arbiter to which Owner is a party, or any law, statute, rule or regulation by which Owner is bound; such documents are and will be valid and binding obligations of Owner, and are and will be enforceable in accordance with their terms. (ii) As of the Closing Date, the Property is not subject to any leases or possessory rights of any party other than Owner. (g) As-Is. Except as herein expressly stated, the Authority is purchasing the Property (or the applicable part thereof) based upon its own investigation and inquiry and is not relying on any warranty or representation of Owner or any other person and is agreeing to accept and purchase the Property “as is, where is” subject to the conditions of examination herein set forth and the express warranties and representations herein contained. (h) Condemnation; Casualty. If eminent domain proceedings are commenced against all or a part of the Property, or if all or a substantial part of the property is damaged by fire or other casualty, on or before the Closing Date, Owner shall immediately give written notice to the Authority, and the Authority shall have the right to terminate any exercised Purchase Option by giving written notice of such termination to Owner within 6 4826-3826-2468\3 30 days after Owner’s notice of such proceedings is given to the Authority. If the Authority shall fail to give such notice, then the parties shall proceed to Closing, and Owner shall assign to the Authority all rights to appear in and receive any award from such proceedings. (i) Broker’s Commission. Owner and the Authority warrant and represent to each other that they have dealt with no brokers, finders or the like in connection with this transaction, and agree to indemnify and hold each other harmless from all claims, damages, costs or expenses of or for any fees or commissions owing to any brokers, finders or the like resulting from their actions or agreements regarding the execution or performance of this Agreement, and will pay all costs of defending any action or lawsuit brought to recover any such fees or commissions incurred by the other party, including reasonable attorneys’ fees. (j) Remedies. If the Authority defaults in performance of its obligations under this Agreement, Owner shall have the right to terminate this Agreement in the manner provided by Minn. Stat. Sec. 559.21 (inclusive of a minimum 30-day notice and right to cure) as its sole and exclusive remedy. If Owner defaults in performance of its obligations under this Agreement, the Authority will provide written notice thereof to Owner. If Owner fails to cure such default within 30 days after such notice, the Authority shall have the right, in addition to all other rights under applicable law, including the right to seek and obtain specific performance of this this Agreement. 7. Notices. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, a notice, demand or other communication under this Agreement by any party to any other shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is (a) dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, (b) sent by recognized overnight courier (such as Federal Express), or (c) delivered personally, as follows: In the case of Owner: Orion 4500 France, LLC Attn: Ted Carlson 4530 West 77th Street, Suite 365 Edina, MN 55435 In the case of the Authority: Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota Attention: Executive Director 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 with a copy to: Dorsey & Whitney LLP Attn: Jay Lindgren 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address with respect to any such party as that party may, from time to time, designate in writing and forward to the other, as provided in this Section. 7 4826-3826-2468\3 8. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement and the purchase options set forth herein shall inure to the benefit of the Authority and its successors and assigns and be binding upon Owner and the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of Owner, and upon any individual or entity acquiring the Property or any portion thereof, or any interest therein, whether by operation of law or otherwise. 9. Waiver. The waiver by any party hereto of any breach or default of any provisions anywhere contained in this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach or default thereof. No provision of this Agreement shall be deemed to have been waived by any party hereto unless such waiver is in writing and signed by the party charged with any such waiver. 10. Amendments. Except as otherwise herein provided, and not otherwise, no subsequent alteration, amendment, change, waiver, discharge, termination, deletion, or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon either party unless in writing and signed by both parties. 11. Joinder; Permitted Encumbrance. Except for the mortgagee consent attached hereto, this Agreement does not require the joinder or approval of any other person and each of the parties respectfully has the full, unrestricted and exclusive legal right and power to enter into this Agreement for the term and upon the provisions herein recited and for the use and purposes hereinabove set forth. This Agreement shall constitute a permitted encumbrance under any loan agreement heretofore or hereafter entered into between Owner and any construction lender or permanent lender. 12. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. 13. Law Governing. This Agreement will be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. 14. Subdivision. The parties acknowledge that the Redevelopment Area may be subdivided by a Registered Land Survey. Following such subdivision, any party hereto may prepare an amendment to this Agreement to (i) confirm those parcels of the Redevelopment Area which are burdened or benefitted by the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and (ii) release all other parcels of the Redevelopment Area from the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Any requesting party shall deliver the amendment to all other fee owners of the Redevelopment Area and the City for execution, and all other fee owners of the Redevelopment Area and the City shall promptly execute and acknowledge the amendment and return it to the party that prepared the amendment for recording against title to the Redevelopment Area. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature pages follow] [Signature Page to Right of First Purchase Option Agreement (4500 France)] 4826-3826-2468\3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. AUTHORITY: HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By ___________________, Chair By ___________________, Secretary STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of ___________, 2020, by ___________________ and ___________________, the Chair and Secretary respectively, of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of said Authority. Notary Public [Signature Page to Right of First Purchase Option Agreement (4500 France)] 4826-3826-2468\3 OWNER: ORION 4500 FRANCE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: Orion Investments Edina II, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company Its: Manager By: Name: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of ___________, 2020, by ______________________, the _________________ of ORION INVESTMENTS EDINA II, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, as the manager of ORION 4500 FRANCE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability companies. Notary Public A-1 [Exhibit A to Right of First Purchase Option Agreement (4500 France)] 4826-3826-2468\3 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Redevelopment Area Real property in the City of Edina, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, described as follows: Parcel 1: Lots 1 and 2 and that part of Lot 6 described as follows: Commencing at the most Northerly corner of said Lot 6; thence South along the East line of said lot; 40.62 feet; thence Northwesterly 30.2 feet to a point on the Northerly line of said Lot 6, distant 27.19 feet Westerly from the point of beginning; thence Northeasterly to the point of beginning, all in Block 2, "Fairbairn's Rearrangement" in Waveland and Waveland Park, including all of the vacated alley which lies North of the South line of said Lot 2 extended West, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Abstract property) Parcel 2: Lots 3, 4 and 5; That part of Lot 6, described as follows: Commencing on the Easterly line of said Lot at a point distant 40.62 feet Southerly from the most Northerly corner of said Lot, thence Northwesterly 30.2 feet to a point on the Northwesterly line of said Lot distant 27.19 feet Southwesterly from the most Northerly corner of said Lot; thence Southwesterly along the Northwesterly line of said Lot to the most Westerly corner of said Lot, thence Southeasterly along the Southwesterly line of said Lot to the most Southerly corner of said Lot, thence Northerly along the Easterly line of said Lot to the point of beginning; That part of the alley now vacated, described as follows: Commencing at the point of intersection of the center line of alley, now vacated with the North line of Lot 3 extended Westward, thence East on said extended line to the Northwest corner of said Lot 3, thence along the Easterly line of said alley to the most Southerly corner of Lot 5, thence Southwesterly along an extension of the Southeasterly line of said Lot to the center line of said alley, thence Northwesterly along the center line of said alley to a point of its intersection with a line erected to bisect the angle existing in the Westerly line of said alley, thence Southwest along said line to the West line of said alley, thence North along said West line to a point in said line 40.62 feet South of the most Northerly corner of Lot 6, the same being the point of intersection to said West line of alley with the extension Westward of the North line of Lot 3, thence East along said extended line to the point of beginning; All in Block 2, "Fairbairn's Rearrangement" in Waveland and Waveland Park. Hennepin County, Minnesota (Torrens property, Certificate of Title No. 1474225) A-2 [Signature Page to Right of First Purchase Option Agreement (4500 France)] 4826-3826-2468\3 Parcel 3: Lot 7, Block 2, Fairbairn's Rearrangement in Waveland and Waveland Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together with that part of the adjacent vacated alley that accrued thereto by reason of the vacation thereof. (Abstract property) Parcel 4: Lot 8, Block 2, Fairbairn's Rearrangement in Waveland and Waveland Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota less and except that portion described as commencing at the most westerly corner of said Lot 8; thence on an assumed bearing of North 47 degrees 35 minutes 29 seconds East, along the northerly line of said Lot 8, a distance of 12.00 feet; thence South 33 degrees 43 minutes 44 seconds East, parallel with the west line of said Lot 8, a distance of 75.00 feet; thence South 47 degrees 35 minutes 29 seconds West, parallel with said northerly line of Lot 8, a distance of 12.00 feet, to said west line of Lot 8; thence North 33 degrees 43 minutes 44 seconds West, along said west line of Lot 8, a distance of 75.00 feet to the point of beginning. (Abstract property) 4826-3826-2468\3 CONSENT AND SUBORDINATION The undersigned, Bremer Bank, National Association, a national banking association, holder of that certain Mortgage, Security Agreement, Fixture Financing Statement and Assignment of Leases and Rents executed by Orion 4500 France, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, dated July 1, 2019, filed July 15, 2019, as Document No. A10678911, in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and filed July 8, 2019, as Document No. T05626060, in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota (the “Mortgage”), hereby consents to the foregoing Right of First Purchase Option Agreement (4500 France) (the “Purchase Option Agreement”), and hereby subjects and subordinates the Mortgage and all of its right, title and interest in and to the Purchase Option Agreement. Bremer Bank, National Association, a national banking association By: Name: Title: STATE OF ______________ ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of __________, 2020, by ____________________, the _________________ of Bremer Bank, National Association, a national banking association, on behalf of the association. Notary Public 1 4818-6264-4616\5 PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT AGREEMENT between THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA and ORION INVESTMENTS EDINA, LLC Dated as of _________________, 2020 THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Dorsey & Whitney LLP 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 2 4818-6264-4616\5 PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is dated _____________, 2020, and is made by and between the CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota statutory city (the “City”), and ORION INVESTMENTS EDINA, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Owner”). RECITALS: A. Owner owns certain land located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit A (the “Owner Property”). B. The Housing and Authority of Edina, Minnesota, the City, and Orion 4500 France, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Developer”), entered into that certain Redevelopment Agreement dated December 18, 2018, as amended, for the redevelopment by Developer of certain property adjoining the Owner Property, and legally described on Exhibit B (the “Redevelopment Property”). C. Owner wishes to grant to the City a permanent, public easement for ingress, egress, and access to and from the public right of way known as France Avenue and the Redevelopment Property, in the location described on Exhibit C-1 and depicted on Exhibit C-2 (the “Easement Area”) pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the others as follows: ARTICLE I GRANT OF EASEMENT Section 1.1 Easement Premises. Owner hereby grants and conveys to the City, for the benefit of the City and the general public, a non-exclusive, perpetual public easement (the “Easement”) over, across, upon and through the Easement Area, together with and including all ancillary amenities, components, and fixtures which may be located thereon and therein (collectively, the “Easement Premises”), for the purposes of vehicular and pedestrian ingress, egress and access to and from France Avenue and the Redevelopment Property, all in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. ARTICLE II TERM Section 2.1 Term. The Easement granted hereby, and each reservation, covenant, condition and restriction contained in this Agreement, shall be effective as of the date hereof, shall be perpetual, and shall remain in effect until affirmatively released by the City. Such release shall be evidenced by the recording of a release or termination of this Agreement in the real estate records of Hennepin County, Minnesota, at which time this Agreement shall terminate, subject to 3 4818-6264-4616\5 reconciliation of expenses and obligations incurred through the date of release or termination and the continuation of those provisions that specifically survive termination of this Agreement, and the Easement Area and any other areas of the Easement Premises shall thereafter belong to and be under the sole control of Owner. ARTICLE III USE OF EASEMENT PREMISES Section 3.1 Operation and Control of Easement Premises. During the term of this Agreement, Owner shall operate the Easement Premises in accordance with this Agreement and all applicable governmental laws, ordinances, regulations and orders, at Owner’s sole cost and expense. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Owner has full authority and control over the management, operation, and use of the Easement Premises. Section 3.2 Waste, Nuisance, Damage, Disfigurement or Injury to Easement Premises. Neither the City nor Owner shall knowingly or willfully commit or suffer to be committed any waste or damage in or upon the Easement Premises, or any disfigurement or injury to any improvements hereafter erected or located upon the Easement Premises, or any part thereof, or the fixtures and/or equipment thereof. Owner, in its use and occupancy of the Easement Premises, shall not knowingly and willfully commit or suffer to be committed any act or thing which constitutes a nuisance. Usual and normal wear and tear, damage by the elements, unavoidable casualty or depreciation and diminution over time shall not be considered “waste,” “nuisance,” “damage, “disfigurement,” or “injury.” Section 3.3 Owner’s Reservation of Certain Rights. The City’s easement rights under this Agreement shall be subject to the following reservations, as well as the other applicable provisions contained in this Agreement: (a) Owner reserves the right to close-off any portion of the Easement Premises for such reasonable period of time as may be necessary, in the opinion of Owner, to prevent the acquisition of prescriptive rights by anyone; provided, however, that prior to closing- off any portion of the Easement Premises, Owner shall give as much written notice as reasonably practicable of its intention to do so. (b) Owner reserves the right to temporarily erect or place barriers in and around areas on the Easement Premises which are being constructed and/or repaired in order to ensure either safety of persons or protection of property. (c) Owner reserves the right to adopt and enforce reasonable rules and regulations for the safe, efficient, and orderly use and operation of the Easement Premises, so long as such rules and regulations are applied on a non-discriminatory basis, do not adversely impact the City’s or the public’s rights to use of the Easement Premises as set forth in this Agreement, and are mutually agreed to by Owner and the City Manager (d) Owner reserves the right to access and use the Easement Premises and grant rights to other parties the right of access and use of the Easement Premises at all times and 4 4818-6264-4616\5 in any manner, and grant additional rights therein, so long as such access, use, or grant is not inconsistent with the rights granted to the City and general public hereunder. ARTICLE IV MAINTENANCE OF THE EASEMENT PREMISES Section 4.1 Maintenance. At all times during the term hereof, Owner, at its cost and expense, shall keep and maintain the Easement Premises in good condition and repair in a first- class manner, which such maintenance shall include, without limitation, the following: (a) all repairs, replacements, renewals, alterations, additions and betterments thereto, structural and non-structural, ordinary and extraordinary, and foreseen and unforeseen, all as may be necessary to keep the Easement Premises in the condition and repair required by this Agreement, and which do not adversely impact the City’s or the public’s rights to use of the Easement Premises as set forth in this Agreement; (b) maintaining all sidewalk and driveway surfaces in a smooth and evenly- covered condition, which maintenance work shall include repairing and resurfacing the same; (c) periodic removal of all papers, debris, filth, refuse, ice and snow, provided all of the foregoing shall be performed at appropriate intervals during such times as shall not unreasonably interfere with the use of the Easement Premises; (d) placing, keeping in repair, replacing and repainting any appropriate directional signs or markers, within or associated with the Easement Premises. Section 4.2 No Obligation of the City to Repair or Maintain. The City shall have no obligation of any kind, expressed or implied, to repair, rebuild, restore, reconstruct, modify, alter, replace, or maintain the Easement Premises or any part thereof. ARTICLE V TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS Section 5.1 Payment of Taxes and Assessments. Owner shall pay, or cause to be paid, before becoming delinquent, all real estate taxes, charges, assessments, and levies, assessed and levied by any governmental taxing authority during the term of this Agreement against the Easement Premises. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall require Owner to pay any franchise, estate, inheritance, excise, succession, capital levy, or transfer tax of the City or any income, excess profits or revenue tax payable by the City under this Agreement. Owner shall have the right and option, at any time but solely at Owner’s expense, to pay any real estate taxes or assessments in installments or under protest or in a similar manner, or to contest the levy or amount of the same in appropriate legal or administrative proceedings. 5 4818-6264-4616\5 ARTICLE VI INDEMNIFICATION, INSURANCE Section 6.1 Indemnification of the City. Except to the extent caused by the willful misconduct or negligence of the City, its employees or agents, or the general public, or arising out of the default by the City and its officers, employees or agents, of obligations made pursuant to a contract with Owner, including this Agreement, Owner hereby covenants and agrees to assume and to permanently indemnify and save harmless the City and its employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, damages, costs, expenses, reasonable attorneys’ fees, and liability in connection with the loss of life, personal injury and/or damage to property, to the extent arising from or out of the design or initial construction, maintenance and operation of the Easement Premises, or in connection with the use or occupancy of the Easement Premises, or any part thereof, by Owner, or to the extent arising out of the breach of Owner’s obligations hereunder. Section 6.2 Property Insurance. At all times during the term hereof, Owner, at its sole cost and expense, shall keep the Easement Premises, and all alterations, extensions, and improvements thereto and replacements thereof, insured, in the amount of the full replacement cost thereof and with such deductibles as Owner deems appropriate, against loss or damage by fire and against those casualties covered by extended coverage insurance and against vandalism and malicious mischief and against such other risks, of a similar or dissimilar nature, as are customarily covered with respect to improvements similar in construction, general location, use, and occupancy to such improvements. Section 6.3 Personal Property. All property of every kind and character which Owner may keep or store in, at, upon, or about the Easement Premises shall be kept and stored at the sole risk, cost, and expense of Owner as it may determine. Section 6.4 Liability Insurance. During the term of this Agreement, Owner shall procure and maintain continuously in effect (or shall cause the same to occur), the following policies of insurance of the kind and minimum amounts as are customarily maintained with respect to improvements similar to those located on the Easement Premises, at commercially reasonable coverage levels, to be reviewed from time to time by Owner: (a) insurance against liability for injuries to or death of any person or damage to or loss of property arising out of or in any way relating to the use, occupancy, or condition of the Easement Premises, or any part thereof, including insuring the indemnification obligations set forth in Section 6.1 above, which such insurance shall provide that the City is an additional insured. Section 6.5 General Insurance Requirement. All insurance required in this Agreement shall be placed with financially sound and reputable insurers licensed to transact business in the State of Minnesota. Owner shall promptly following the City’s request therefor, furnish the City with copies of policies evidencing all such insurance or a certificate or certificates of the respective insurers stating that such insurance is in force and effect. Each policy of insurance herein required shall contain a provision that the insurer shall not cancel it without giving written notice to the 6 4818-6264-4616\5 City at least 10 days before the cancellation becomes effective. The insurance coverage herein required may be provided by a blanket insurance policy or policies. Section 6.6 No Obligation of the City for Insurance. At no time and under no circumstances shall the City be required to take out, maintain in force and effect, or pay for any type of insurance coverage with reference to the protection of and/or ownership of and/or occupancy of and/or a suit relating to the Easement Premises and/or any improvements hereafter located thereon. ARTICLE VII ASSIGNMENT Section 7.1 Assignment by the City. During the term of this Agreement, the City may not assign or transfer its interest under this Agreement without the prior written consent of Owner. Section 7.2 Assignment by Owner. Owner may assign or otherwise transfer its interest under this Agreement in connection with any sale or transfer of the Owner Property. ARTICLE VIII CASUALTY Section 8.1 Destruction. In the event that all or any part of the Easement Premises are destroyed by fire or other casualty, and subject to a determination by the relevant mortgage lender, Owner shall promptly rebuild, reconstruct and/or restore the same to the extent insurance proceeds are available or, in the event insurance proceeds are not sufficient to reconstruct the same, to the extent insurance proceeds combined with any contributions by Owner toward reconstruction are available. ARTICLE IX EMINENT DOMAIN Section 9.1 Major Condemnation. If all of the Easement Premises is taken, acquired, or condemned by eminent domain for any public or quasi-public use or purpose, this Agreement shall terminate as of the date of vesting of title in the condemning authority. Each party shall make its own claim in the condemnation proceeding based upon the value of its respective interest in the Easement Premises. ARTICLE X DEFAULT AND REMEDIES Section 10.1 Default by Owner. If Owner fails to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement, and fails to cure such default after 30 days’ written notice of such default or, if such default cannot reasonably be cured within such 30 days, fails to commence curative action 7 4818-6264-4616\5 and thereafter diligently complete the same, then, in such case, the City may pursue all available remedies at law and in equity. ARTICLE XI MISCELLANEOUS Section 11.1 Waiver. The waiver by any party hereto of any breach or default of any provisions anywhere contained in this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach or default thereof. No provision of this Agreement shall be deemed to have been waived by any party hereto unless such waiver is in writing and signed by the party charged with any such waiver. Section 11.2 Amendments. Except as otherwise herein provided, and not otherwise, no subsequent alteration, amendment, change, waiver, discharge, termination, deletion, or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon either party unless in writing and signed by both parties. Owner and the City agree to join in and consent to amendments to this Agreement, to the extent such amendments are reasonably required by Owner’s relevant mortgage lender encumbering the Easement Premises and/or Owner Property. Section 11.3 Joinder; Permitted Encumbrance. Except for the mortgagee consent attached hereto, this Agreement does not require the joinder or approval of any other person and each of the parties respectfully has the full, unrestricted and exclusive legal right and power to enter into this Agreement for the term and upon the provisions herein recited and for the use and purposes hereinabove set forth. This Agreement shall constitute a permitted encumbrance under any loan agreement heretofore or hereafter entered into between Owner and any construction lender or permanent lender. Section 11.4 Dedication. Nothing contained in this Agreement will be deemed to be a gift or dedication of any portion of the Easement Premises to the general public, except as explicitly set forth in this Agreement. Section 11.5 Notices. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, a notice, demand or other communication under this Agreement by any party to any other shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is (a) dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, (b) sent by recognized overnight courier (such as Federal Express), or (c) delivered personally, as follows: In the case of Owner: Orion Investments Edina, LLC Attn: Ted Carlson 4530 West 77th Street, Suite 365 Edina, MN 55435 In the case of the City: City of Edina Attn: City Manager 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 8 4818-6264-4616\5 or at such other address with respect to any such party as that party may, from time to time, designate in writing and forward to the other, as provided in this Section. Section 11.6 No Third Party Beneficiary. This Agreement is not intended to give or confer any benefits, rights, privileges, claims, action or remedies to any person or entity. Section 11.7 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. Section 11.8 Law Governing. This Agreement will be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. Section 11.9 Consents and Approvals. In all cases where consents or approvals are required hereunder, such consents or approvals shall not be unreasonably conditioned, delayed or withheld. All consents or approvals shall be in writing in order to be effective. Section 11.10 No Additional Waiver Implied by One Waiver. If any agreement contained in this Agreement should be breached by any party and thereafter waived by another party, such waiver shall be limited to the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive any other concurrent, previous or subsequent breach hereunder. Section 11.11 Survival. The easements granted hereby and each reservation, covenant, condition and restriction contained in this Agreement will run with the land and will be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, as the case may be, Owner and the City and their respective successors and assigns. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature pages follow] 9 [Signature Page to Public Access Easement Agreement] 4818-6264-4616\5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. CITY: CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: ________________________ Mayor By: ________________________ City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ______________, 2020, by _________________ and ___________________, the Mayor and City Manager, respectively, of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of the City. Notary Public 10 [Signature Page to Public Access Easement Agreement] 4818-6264-4616\5 OWNER: ORION INVESTMENTS EDINA, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company By: Name: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of ______________, 2020, by __________________, the ______________ of ORION INVESTMENTS EDINA, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. Notary Public 11 [Exhibit A to Public Access Easement Agreement] 4818-6264-4616\5 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Owner Property (Torrens Property) 12 [Exhibit B to Public Access Easement Agreement] 4818-6264-4616\5 EXHIBIT B Legal Description of the Redevelopment Property Parcel 1: Lots 1 and 2 and that part of Lot 6 described as follows: Commencing at the most Northerly corner of said Lot 6; thence South along the East line of said lot; 40.62 feet; thence Northwesterly 30.2 feet to a point on the Northerly line of said Lot 6, distant 27.19 feet Westerly from the point of beginning; thence Northeasterly to the point of beginning, all in Block 2, “Fairbairn’s Rearrangement” in Waveland and Waveland Park, including all of the vacated alley which lies North of the South line of said Lot 2 extended West, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Abstract Property) Parcel 2: Lots 3, 4 and 5; That part of Lot 6, described as follows: Commencing on the Easterly line of said Lot at a point distant 40.62 feet Southerly from the most Northerly corner of said Lot, thence Northwesterly 30.2 feet to a point on the Northwesterly line of said Lot distant 27.19 feet Southwesterly from the most Northerly corner of said Lot; thence Southwesterly along the Northwesterly line of said Lot to the most Westerly corner of said Lot, thence Southeasterly along the Southwesterly line of said Lot to the most Southerly corner of said Lot, thence Northerly along the Easterly line of said Lot to the point of beginning; That part of the alley now vacated, described as follows: Commencing at the point of intersection of the center line of alley, now vacated with the North line of Lot 3 extended Westward, thence East on said extended line to the Northwest corner of said Lot 3, thence along the Easterly line of said alley to the most Southerly corner of Lot 5, thence Southwesterly along an extension of the Southeasterly line of said Lot to the center line of said alley, thence Northwesterly along the center line of said alley to a point of its intersection with a line erected to bisect the angle existing in the Westerly line of said alley, thence Southwest along said line to the West line of said alley, thence North along said West line to a point in said line 40.62 feet South of the most Northerly corner of Lot 6, the same being the point of intersection to said West line of alley with the extension Westward of the North line of Lot 3, thence East along said extended line to the point of beginning; All in Block 2, "Fairbairn's Rearrangement" In Waveland And Waveland Park (Torrens Property) Parcel 3: Lot 7, Block 2, Fairbairn's Rearrangement in Waveland and Waveland Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 13 [Exhibit B to Public Access Easement Agreement] 4818-6264-4616\5 Together with that part of the adjacent vacated alley that accrued thereto by reason of the vacation thereof. (Abstract property) Parcel 4: Lot 8, Block 2, Fairbairn's Rearrangement in Waveland and Waveland Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota less and except that portion described as commencing at the most westerly corner of said Lot 8; thence on an assumed bearing of North 47 degrees 35 minutes 29 seconds East, along the northerly line of said Lot 8, a distance of 12.00 feet; thence South 33 degrees 43 minutes 44 seconds East, parallel with the west line of said Lot 8, a distance of 75.00 feet; thence South 47 degrees 35 minutes 29 seconds West, parallel with said northerly line of Lot 8, a distance of 12.00 feet, to said west line of Lot 8; thence North 33 degrees 43 minutes 44 seconds West, along said west line of Lot 8, a distance of 75.00 feet to the point of beginning. (Abstract property) 14 [Exhibit C-1 to Public Access Easement Agreement] 4818-6264-4616\5 EXHIBIT C-1 Legal Description of the Easement Area An easement over and across the following described property: That part of Block 20, Waveland Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and that part of the land designated on said plat as "Minneapolis Lyndale and Minnetonka Railway" described as follows: commencing at a point in the West line of France Avenue distant 260 feet North from the South line of Section 7, Township 28 North, Range 24, West of the Fourth Principal Meridian; thence West parallel with said South Section line 150 feet; thence North parallel with France Avenue to Northwesterly line of abandoned right of way of the Minneapolis Lyndale and Minnetonka Railway Company; thence Northeasterly along said Northwesterly line of said abandoned right of way to West line of France Avenue; thence South 249.25 feet to beginning except that part of the foregoing Tract being hereinafter referred to as Tract A described as follows: That part of said Tract A lying South of a line bearing South 59 degrees 54 minutes 28 seconds West from a point in the West line of France Avenue 145 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Tract A and East of a line bearing North 0 degrees 18 minutes 54 seconds West from a point in the South line of said Tract A, 77 feet Westerly of the Southeast corner of said Tract A. Said easement is described as beginning at the most northerly corner of said Tract A; thence southerly, along the east line of said Tract A, 41.50 feet; thence westerly, at a right angle to said east line of Tract A, 20.73 feet to a line lying 18.00 feet southeasterly of and parallel with the northwesterly line of said Tract A; thence southeasterly, along said parallel line, 115.75 feet; thence northwesterly, at a right angle to said parallel line, 18.00 feet to said northwesterly line of Tract A; thence northeasterly, along said northwesterly line of Tract A, 185.51 feet to the point of beginning. 15 [Exhibit C-2 to Public Access Easement Agreement] 4818-6264-4616\5 EXHIBIT C-2 Depiction of the Easement Area 16 4818-6264-4616\5 CONSENT AND SUBORDINATION The undersigned, SUNRISE BANKS, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, holder of that certain Mortgage, Security Agreement, Fixture Financing Statement and Assignment of Leases and Rents executed by ORION INVESTMENTS EDINA, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, dated October 4, 2016, filed October 4, 2016 as Document No. T05386781, in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby consents to the foregoing Public Access Easement Agreement (the “Easement Agreement”), and hereby subjects and subordinates the Mortgage and all of its right, title and interest in and to the Easement Agreement. SUNRISE BANKS, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association, By: _________________________ Name: _______________________ Title: ________________________ STATE OF ______________ ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of ________________, 20 , by _____________________, the __________________ of SUNRISE BANKS, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association, on behalf of the national banking association. _____________________________ Notary Public 4837-4562-4260\3 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS (Affordable Housing) THIS DECLARATION is made as of the _____ day of ___________, 2020, by ORION 4500 FRANCE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Declarant”). RECITALS A. Declarant, is the owner of certain real properties situated in the city of Edina, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (the “Property”). B. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”); the City of Edina Minnesota, a Minnesota statutory city (the “City”); and Declarant entered into that certain Redevelopment Agreement (as amended, the “Contract”) dated December 18, 2018. C. The Contract provides for the redevelopment of the Property by Declarant in coordination with the Authority and with the cooperation and assistance of City and provides for the expenditure of certain public funds to assist in such redevelopment of the Property and construction of certain improvements thereon, including an approximately 46-unit apartment building (the “Project”). D. The City, by Resolution No. 2018-137, dated December 18, 2018, approved Declarant’s development plan and rezoning for the Project (“Approval”). E. Pursuant to the Contract and as a condition to the Approvals, Declarant has agreed to impose restrictive covenants upon the Property to ensure that at least three of the residential units within the Project will remain affordable to certain low-income persons and households (“Affordable Units”). 2 4837-4562-4260\3 F. Declarant, under this Declaration, intends, declares and covenants that the restrictive covenants set forth herein governing the use, occupancy and transfer of the Project shall be and are covenants running with the Property for the Term stated herein and binding upon all subsequent owners of the Property for such Term, and are not merely personal covenants of Declarant. NOW, THEREFORE, said Declarant makes the following Declaration, hereby specifying that said Declaration shall constitute covenants to run with the land and shall be binding on all parties in interest and their respective successors and assigns: ARTICLE I. OCCUPANCY, INCOME AND RENT RESTRICTIONS Section 1.1. Declarant shall lease the Affordable Units only to individuals or households (each a “Qualified Household”) whose gross annual income is fifty percent (50%) or less of the area median income (including adjustments for family size) , as determined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (“HUD”) Area Median Income for the Minneapolis-Saint Paul-Bloomington Metropolitan Statistical Area (“AMI”). Section 1.2. The Affordable Units shall bear annual rents not greater than the rental rate limits for such Qualified Households (adjusted for bedroom count and including utilities) as published by HUD, as such rental rate limits are updated annually by HUD (and if HUD ceases to publish and update such rates, such annual rents for the Affordable Units shall not be not greater than thirty percent (30%) of fifty percent (50%) of AMI, as the case may be with respect to the applicable Qualified Household, less the monthly allowance for utilities and services to be paid by the tenant). No security deposit shall be required in excess of the amount of one month of rent in connection with any Affordable Unit. Section 1.3. Declarant covenants and agrees that no tenant household will be approved by Declarant for initial occupancy of an Affordable Unit unless and until Declarant shall have determined (through verification of income, assets, expenses, and deductions) whether such tenant household is a Qualified Household. Declarant must re-examine and verify the income of each tenant household living in an Affordable Unit at least annually. Section 1.4. Residential units of the Project shall qualify as Affordable Units despite temporary noncompliance with this Article I if the noncompliance is caused by increases in the incomes of existing tenant household and if actions satisfactory to the Authority are being taken to ensure that all vacancies are filled in accordance with this Article I until the noncompliance is corrected. ARTICLE II. ADDITIONAL REPRESENTATIONS, COVENANTS, AND WARRANTIES OF DECLARANT Section 2.1. Declarant shall maintain the Affordable Units and the Project in compliance with all requirements of the Contract and Approvals, any requirements of any lender 3 4837-4562-4260\3 whose loan is secured by a mortgage to which Declarant is a party or by which it or the Project is bound, and applicable ordinances, building and use restrictions, code-required building permits, and any requirements with respect to licenses, permits, and agreements necessary for the lawful use and operation of the Project. Section 2.2. The execution and performance of this Declaration by Declarant (i) will not violate or, as applicable, have not violated any provision of law, rule or regulation, or any order of any court or other agency or governmental body, and (ii) will not violate or, as applicable, have not violated any provision of any indenture, agreement, mortgage, mortgage note, or other instrument to which Declarant is a party or by which it or the Project is bound, and (iii) will not result in the creation or imposition of any prohibited encumbrance of any nature. Section 2.3. Declarant shall not refuse to lease an Affordable Unit to the holder of a voucher or certificate of eligibility under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of I937 solely because of the status of the prospective tenant as such a holder. Section 2.4. Declarant shall obtain the consent to this Declaration of any prior recorded lien-holder for the Project and shall cause such liens to be subordinated to this Declaration. Section 2.5. Declarant has not and will not execute any other agreement with provisions contradictory to, or in opposition to, the provisions hereof and that, in any event, the requirements of this Declaration are paramount and controlling as to the rights and obligations set forth herein and supersede any other document's provisions in conflict herewith. Section 2.6. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Contract and the Approvals, Declarant may sell, transfer or exchange the Project, the Property or any portion thereof, but Declarant shall notify the Authority and City in writing at least thirty (30) days prior to such sale, transfer or exchange, and use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain the acknowledgment of any buyer or successor or other person acquiring the Project or any interest therein that such acquisition is subject to the covenants and restrictions of this Declaration (and to the requirements of Contract incorporated herein). Failure by Declarant to obtain such acknowledgment shall not be deemed to impair the covenants and restrictions of this Declaration. Section 2.7. Declarant shall not demolish any part of the Project or substantially subtract from any real or personal property of the Project or permit the use of any residential unit for any purpose other than rental housing during the Term of this Declaration unless required by law. Section 2.8. Promptly upon any casualty loss or damage to all or any part of the Project (including subsurface structural support elements), Declarant shall proceed with diligence to restore the Project to the condition prior to the casualty with the insurance proceeds obtained with respect to the loss or damage to the extent the insurance proceeds recovered allow for such rebuilding; provided, however, Declarant shall not be obligated to rebuild the Project if any of Declarant’s lenders or loan agreements (whether executed before or after the date hereof) do not permit such rebuilding or require that insurance amounts recovered with respect to any loss or damage to the Project be paid directly to the lender. 4 4837-4562-4260\3 ARTICLE III. ENFORCEMENT OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS Section 3.1. Declarant shall submit a rent roll, including the income and household size of the tenants of the Affordable Units, and the proposed rent schedule to the City (or such subdivision of the City administrating the City’s affordable housing program) annually for approval on the basis of compliance with this Declaration, with an initial deadline for submission of three (3) months following the Commencement Date (defined below) and thereafter an annual deadline for submission of September 1st for the Term of this Declaration. Section 3.2. Declarant shall permit, during normal business hours and upon reasonable notice, any duly authorized representative of the Authority or City, to inspect any books and records of Declarant regarding the Project with respect to the incomes of tenant households of Affordable Units the rents charged for Affordable Units to ensure compliance with the requirements of this Declaration. Declarant shall, upon annual invoicing, reimburse the City (or such subdivision of the City administrating the City’s affordable housing program) for third- party expenses related to monitoring of Declarant’s compliance with this Declaration, which such costs shall initially not exceed $500.00 per year (plus any additional costs necessitated by re-inspections for noncompliance with this Declaration) and thereafter be subject to reasonable adjustment from time to time. Section 3.3. At the City’s or Authority’s request, Declarant will submit any other information, documents or certifications that Declarant, in its reasonable discretion, deems necessary to substantiate Declarant’s compliance with the requirements of this Declaration. Section 3.4. Pursuant to the terms of the Contract, the Affordable Units shall be subject to the terms and condition of the Inclusionary Housing Policy Program Guide to be adopted by the City. ARTICLE IV. TERM Section 4.1. This Declaration, and the covenants and restrictions contained herein, shall continue in full force and effect for a period (the “Term”) commencing on the date a Certificate of Completion (as defined in the Contract) is issued by the Authority for the Minimum Improvements (as defined in the Contract) (“Commencement Date”) and ending on the fifteen (15) year anniversary of the Commencement Date. Section 4.2. Declarant’s obligation to operate the Project subject to this Declaration for the Term is independent of the existence and continuance of any tax increment financing and other public assistance contemplated or given by the Authority or the City to Declarant under the Contract (“Public Assistance”). The provisions of this Declaration are intended to survive the termination or extinguishment of any Public Assistance, any mortgage securing the same, and any other security instruments placed of record in connection with the Public Assistance and to survive the termination of any subsequent financing or security instruments placed of record by 5 4837-4562-4260\3 other lenders. This Declaration automatically ceases to be of any force or effect on the date fifteen (15) year anniversary of the Commencement Date without the execution or recording of any additional documents ARTICLE V. REPRESENTATIVES OF BENEFITED PARTIES The Authority and the City are designated as the sole and exclusive representative(s) of any and all other persons or entities also benefited by the covenants, conditions and restrictions of this Declaration, insofar as the enforcement, the construction, the interpretation, the amendment, the release and/or the termination of such covenants, conditions and restrictions are concerned. This designation and appointment shall also run with the Property and the Project and is hereby made and agreed to by Declarant, its successors and assigns, and any subsequent transferee of any interest in the Project, or any part thereof, from Declarant. REMEDIES, ENFORCEABILITY In the event of a violation or attempted violation of any of the covenants, conditions or restrictions herein contained, the Authority or the City may institute and prosecute any proceeding at law or in equity to abate, prevent or enjoin any such violation or to specifically enforce the covenants, conditions and restrictions therein set forth, or to recover monetary damages caused by such violation or attempted violation. Unless terminated as provided herein, the provisions hereof are imposed upon and made applicable to the Project, and shall be enforceable against Declarant, each purchaser, grantee, owner or lessee of the Project and the respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns of each. No delay in enforcing the provisions of said covenants, conditions and restrictions as to any breach or violation shall impair, damage or waive the right to enforce the same or to obtain relief against or recover for the continuation or repetition of such breach or violation or any similar breach or violation thereof at any later time or times. AMENDMENT, TERMINATION OF COVENANTS Section 7.1. The provisions of this Declaration shall not be amended, terminated or deleted during the Term hereof, except by an instrument in writing duly executed by the Authority, the City, and Declarant, their respective successors and assigns, or in accordance with Section 7.2 of this Article VII. Section 7.2. Unless sooner terminated, amended or deleted as provided in this Article VII, the covenants, conditions and restrictions contained herein shall continue in full force and effect through the Term hereof and shall thereupon terminate and be of no further force or effect. ARTICLE VIII. COVENANTS RUNNING WITH THE LAND Declarant intends, declares and covenants, on behalf of itself and all future owners and operators of the Property and the Project during the Term, that this Declaration and the covenants 6 4837-4562-4260\3 and restrictions set forth in this Declaration regulating and restricting the use, occupancy and transfer of the Property and the Project (i) shall be and are covenants running with the Property and the Project, encumbering the Property and the Project for the Term, binding upon Declarant’s successors in title and all subsequent owners and operators of the Property and the Project; (ii) are not merely personal covenants of Declarant; and (iii) shall bind Declarant (and the benefits shall inure to the Authority and the City) and its respective successors and assigns during the Term. Declarant hereby agrees that any and all requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota to be satisfied in order for the provisions of this Declaration to constitute deed restrictions and covenants running with the land shall be deemed to be satisfied in full and that any requirements of privileges of estate are intended to be satisfied, or in the alternate, that an equitable servitude has been created to insure that these restrictions run with the land. For the Term, each and every contract, deed or other instrument hereafter executed conveying the Property and the Project or portion thereof shall expressly provide that such conveyance is subject to this Declaration; provided, however, that the covenants contained herein shall survive and be effective regardless of whether such contract, deed or other instrument hereafter executed conveying the Property and the Project or portion thereof provides that such conveyance is subject to this Declaration. MISCELLANEOUS Section 9.1. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Declaration, a notice, demand or other communication under this Declaration by any party to any other shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or delivered personally, and in the case of Declarant, is addressed to or delivered personally to Declarant at: Declarant at: Orion 4500 France, LLC Attn: Ted Carlson 4530 West 77th Street, Suite 365 Edina, MN 55435 The Authority at: Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota Attention: Executive Director 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 with a copy to: Dorsey & Whitney LLP Attention: Jay R. Lindgren 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 The City at: City of Edina Attention: City Manager 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 with a copy to: Dorsey & Whitney LLP 7 4837-4562-4260\3 Attention: Jay R. Lindgren 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address with respect to any such party as that party may, from time to time, designate in writing and forward to the other, as provided in this Section. Section 9.2. This Declaration will be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. Section 9.3. If any provisions hereof shall be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining portions shall not in any way be affected or impaired. Section 9.4. The parties acknowledge that the Property may be subdivided by a Registered Land Survey. Following such subdivision, the fee owner of any portion of the Property may prepare an amendment to this Declaration to (i) confirm those parcels of the Property which are burdened or benefitted by the terms and condition of this Declaration, and (ii) release all other parcels of the Property from the terms and conditions of this Declaration. Such owner shall deliver the amendment to the all other fee owners of the Property and the City for execution, and all other fee owners of the Property and the City shall promptly execute and acknowledge the amendment and return it to the fee owner that prepared the amendment for recording against title to the Property. [SIGNATURES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGES] [Signature Page to Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions] 4837-4562-4260\3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarant has caused this Declaration to be executed as of the date first written above ORION 4500 FRANCE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: Orion Investments Edina II, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company Its: Manager By: Name: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of _________, 2020, by ______________________, the _________________ of ORION INVESTMENTS EDINA II, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, as the manager of ORION 4500 FRANCE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability companies. Notary Public THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Dorsey & Whitney LLP 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 A-1 [Exhibit A to Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions] 4837-4562-4260\3 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY Real property in the City of Edina, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, described as follows: Parcel 1: Lots 1 and 2 and that part of Lot 6 described as follows: Commencing at the most Northerly corner of said Lot 6; thence South along the East line of said lot; 40.62 feet; thence Northwesterly 30.2 feet to a point on the Northerly line of said Lot 6, distant 27.19 feet Westerly from the point of beginning; thence Northeasterly to the point of beginning, all in Block 2, "Fairbairn's Rearrangement" in Waveland and Waveland Park, including all of the vacated alley which lies North of the South line of said Lot 2 extended West, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Abstract property) Parcel 2: Lots 3, 4 and 5; That part of Lot 6, described as follows: Commencing on the Easterly line of said Lot at a point distant 40.62 feet Southerly from the most Northerly corner of said Lot, thence Northwesterly 30.2 feet to a point on the Northwesterly line of said Lot distant 27.19 feet Southwesterly from the most Northerly corner of said Lot; thence Southwesterly along the Northwesterly line of said Lot to the most Westerly corner of said Lot, thence Southeasterly along the Southwesterly line of said Lot to the most Southerly corner of said Lot, thence Northerly along the Easterly line of said Lot to the point of beginning; That part of the alley now vacated, described as follows: Commencing at the point of intersection of the center line of alley, now vacated with the North line of Lot 3 extended Westward, thence East on said extended line to the Northwest corner of said Lot 3, thence along the Easterly line of said alley to the most Southerly corner of Lot 5, thence Southwesterly along an extension of the Southeasterly line of said Lot to the center line of said alley, thence Northwesterly along the center line of said alley to a point of its intersection with a line erected to bisect the angle existing in the Westerly line of said alley, thence Southwest along said line to the West line of said alley, thence North along said West line to a point in said line 40.62 feet South of the most Northerly corner of Lot 6, the same being the point of intersection to said West line of alley with the extension Westward of the North line of Lot 3, thence East along said extended line to the point of beginning; All in Block 2, "Fairbairn's Rearrangement" in Waveland and Waveland Park. Hennepin County, Minnesota (Torrens property, Certificate of Title No. 1474225) A-2 [Exhibit A to Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions] 4837-4562-4260\3 Parcel 3: Lot 7, Block 2, Fairbairn's Rearrangement in Waveland and Waveland Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together with that part of the adjacent vacated alley that accrued thereto by reason of the vacation thereof. (Abstract property) Parcel 4: Lot 8, Block 2, Fairbairn's Rearrangement in Waveland and Waveland Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota less and except that portion described as commencing at the most westerly corner of said Lot 8; thence on an assumed bearing of North 47 degrees 35 minutes 29 seconds East, along the northerly line of said Lot 8, a distance of 12.00 feet; thence South 33 degrees 43 minutes 44 seconds East, parallel with the west line of said Lot 8, a distance of 75.00 feet; thence South 47 degrees 35 minutes 29 seconds West, parallel with said northerly line of Lot 8, a distance of 12.00 feet, to said west line of Lot 8; thence North 33 degrees 43 minutes 44 seconds West, along said west line of Lot 8, a distance of 75.00 feet to the point of beginning. (Abstract property) 4837-4562-4260\3 CONSENT AND SUBORDINATION The undersigned, Bremer Bank, National Association, a national banking association, holder of that certain Mortgage, Security Agreement, Fixture Financing Statement and Assignment of Leases and Rents executed by Orion 4500 France, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, dated July 1, 2019, filed July 15, 2019, as Document No. A10678911, in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and filed July 8, 2019, as Document No. T05626060, in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota (the “Mortgage”), hereby consents to the foregoing Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions (the “Declaration”), and hereby subordinates the Mortgage and all of its right, title and interest in the Property to the Declaration. Bremer Bank, National Association, a national banking association By: Name: Title: STATE OF ______________ ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _________, 2020, by ____________________, the _________________ of Bremer Bank, National Association, a national banking association, on behalf of the association. Notary Public Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.M. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Scott H. Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Ordinance No. 2020-11: Amending Chapter 10 of the Edina City Code Concerning Hourly Restrictions on Certain Operations Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve second reading of Ordinance No. 2020-11 Amending Chapter 10 of the Edina City Code Concerning Hourly Restrictions on Certain Operations. INTRODUCTION: Ordinance No. 2020-11 amends Chapter 10 of the City Code to make two changes: it divides building permits into two classes and establishes reduced permissible hours of construction in each class when compared to the current permissible hours. The purpose of dividing building permits into two classes is to allow our regulatory structure to distinguish between small construction projects which may, in many cases, be completed by homeowners, from large-scale commercial projects under the management of professional construction contractors. The proposed ordinance amendment uses the magnitude of construction as a proxy for the magnitude of noise created by the project. Projects with a smaller valuation are typically smaller in scale and create less disruption and noise than large-scale construction projects. Recall the first reading of Ordinance No. 2020-11 was granted at the Aug. 5, 2020 Council meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Ordinance No. 2020-11 Ordinance 2020-11: Amending Chapter 10 of the Edina City Code Concerning Hourly Restrictions on Certain Operations August 18, 2020 Mayor and City Council Scott H. Neal, City Manager Ordinance No. 2020-11: Amending Chapter 10 of the Edina City Code Concerning Hourly Restrictions on Certain Operations Information / Background: Council Members have asked for an ordinance amendment to be prepared that would increase the peace and quiet of our neighborhoods by restricting the permissible hours of outdoor construction. Ordinance No. 2020-11 amends Chapter 10 of the City Code to make two changes: it divides building permits into two classes and establishes reduced permissible hours of construction in each class when compared to the current permissible hours. The purpose of dividing building permits into two classes is to allow our regulatory structure to distinguish between small construction projects which may, in many cases, be completed by homeowners, from large- scale commercial projects under the management of professional construction contractors. The proposed ordinance amendment uses the magnitude of construction as a proxy for the magnitude of noise created by the project. Projects with a smaller valuation are typically smaller in scale and create less disruption and noise than large-scale construction projects. I consulted with the Building Official on where to draw the line between small- and large-scale construction values. There is no perfect answer to this question, but he thinks a building permit cost for the purpose of this ordinance amendment is $50,000. Currently, audible outdoor construction activities are permissible between the hours of 7 a.m. and 9 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 8 a.m. and 7 p.m., Saturday, Sunday and holidays (New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Fourth of July, Labor Day, Thanksgiving and Christmas). In the proposed ordinance, projects with a building permit value of $50,000 or less would have their permissible construction hours reduced to 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Friday and 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Saturdays, Sundays and holidays. For the larger scale projects with building permits which cost more than $50,000, permissible construction hours would be reduced to 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Friday, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Saturdays and no permissible hours on Sundays and holidays. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Existing enforcement procedures would remain the same. The Building Official would maintain his current discretion to grant waivers to the restrictions on hours in cases of emergency or exigent circumstances. This ordinance does not change other provisions of the City’s noise ordinance. Restricting the number of hours available to construction contractors will likely lengthen the timeline of construction projects in Edina, which has the potential to expose residents to more, not less, noise in the long run. The primary benefit of the proposed ordinance is that it will provide residents a break from the constant din of construction noise and create more opportunities for the peaceful enjoyment of their homes. I recommend City Council approve the requested motion granting approval to the second reading of Ordinance No. 2020-11. 1 211041v1 ORDINANCE NO. 2020-11 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING HOURLY RESTRICTIONS ON CERTAIN OPERATIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 10 Section 23-124(b) of the City Code is amended to read as follows: No person shall engage in or permit construction and repair activities involving the use of any kind of electric, diesel or gas-powered motor vehicles or machine or other power equipment, audible beyond the property line of the property where the activity is occurring, except: For projects requiring a building permit with a building project value of $50,000 or less: Monday-Friday, 7 a.m. – 7 p.m. Saturdays, Sundays and Holidays (New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Fourth of July, Labor Day, Thanksgiving and Christmas), 9 a.m. – 5 p.m. For projects requiring a building permit with a building project value of more than $50,000: Monday-Friday, 7 a.m. – 7 p.m. Saturdays, 9 a.m. – 5 p.m. Sundays and Holidays (New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Fourth of July, Labor Day, Thanksgiving and Christmas), no work Section 2. This ordinance is effective following passage and publication. First Reading: August 5, 2020 Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor 2 211041v1 Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.N. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:MJ Lamon, Community Engagement Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Ordinance No. 2020-12: Amending Chapter 2 of Edina City Code Concerning Boards, Committees, and Commissions Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Ordinance No. 2020-12 Amending Chapter 2 of Edina City Code Concerning Boards, Committees, and Commissions and waive second reading. INTRODUCTION: The ordinance change will allow for City Council to appoint up to three student members until September 1, 2021, and two thereafter. At the Aug. 5 Council meeting, Council directed staff to temporarily allow up to three student commission members per commission to open up the opportunity for more students, given the impacts of other opportunities due to the COVID-19 P andemic. ATTACHMENTS: Description Ordinance No. 2020-12:Amending Chapter 2 of Edina City Code Concerning Boards, Committees, and Commissions 1 206045v2 ORDINANCE NO. 2020-12 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 2, Article III, of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following provision: Sec. 2-80 Membership (a) Regular members. Regular members of boards and commissions established by the council shall be adult residents of the city unless otherwise expressly stated by ordinance. Members who discontinue legal residency in the city shall automatically be deemed to have resigned from office as of the date of such discontinuance. (b) Student members. Student members shall be residents of the city or officially open enrolled as a student at Edina High School and entering sophomore, junior or senior year. Student members shall be nonvoting. (1) Until September 1, 2021, each commission may have up to three student members and two thereafter. Section 2. This ordinance is effective upon adoption. First Reading: August 18, 2020 Second Reading: Waived Published: ATTEST: _________________________________ _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor 2 206045v2 Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: VI.O. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2020-84: Accepting Donations Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2020-84 accepting donations. INTRODUCTION: To comply with State Statute, all donations to the City must be accepted by resolution and approved by two- thirds majority of the Council. See attached resolution with list of donations. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2020-84: Accepting Donations RESOLUTION NO. 2020-84 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Parks & Recreation • Lori Larson $3,200 Donated Bench • Lisa & Mark Orfield $3,200 Donated Bench • Edina Garden Council $1,295 Metal Arbor for Tranquility Garden, at Arneson Acres • Richard Brozic $100 Memorial Fund Dated: August 18, 2020 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 18, 2020, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _______ day of ___________________, 20_____. City Clerk Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: VII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Scott H. Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Proclamation: Women's Equality Day, August 26, 2020 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt proclamation declaring August 26, 2020, Women's Equality Day in Edina to celebrate the centennial of the 19th Amendment officially becoming part of the United States Constitution. INTRODUCTION: August 26, 2020, will mark the nationwide centennial of the 19th Amendment officially becoming part of the United States Constitution, granting women the right to vote. Edina residents are encouraged to acknowledge this important day and call attention to continuing efforts to achieve full equality in our nation. ATTACHMENTS: Description Women's Equality Day August 26, 2020 Proclamation PROCLAMATION WOMEN’S EQUALITY DAY, AUGUST 26, 2020 WHEREAS: On September 8, 1919, Minnesota ratified the 19th Amendment to the United States Constitution granting women the right to vote; and WHEREAS: As the 15th state to ratify women’s suffrage, Minnesota paved the way for other states to ratify the 19th Amendment; and WHEREAS: States and communities across the nation have been celebrating the 19th Amendment and the date of their state’s ratification; and WHEREAS: August 26, 2020 will mark the nationwide centennial of the 19th Amendment officially becoming part of the United States Constitution after the required number of states had ratified. Now, therefore, the Edina City Council does hereby proclaim Wednesday, August 26, 2020, as WOMEN’S EQUALITY DAY in Edina to honor this important anniversary. The bold, courageous, and powerful women who fought for the ratification of the 19th Amendment to the United States Constitution deserve special recognition, especially on the 100th anniversary of its ratification in 2020. In honor of Women’s Equality Day, the France Avenue lights will light up in purple, white and gold as part of the Women’s Suffrage Centennial Commission’s nationwide “Forward Into Light” campaign. All Edina residents are encouraged to acknowledge this important day in our nation’s history in their own way and call attention to our continuing efforts to achieve full equality in our nation. In witness thereof, I have here unto set by hand this 18th day of August, 2020. James B. Hovland, Mayor Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: VIII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Scott H. Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Accept Withdrawal of Resolution 2020-71 and Cancel the Proposed Public Hearing Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Accept staff’s request to withdraw the proposal and recommendation (Resolution 2020-71) to sell the Duggan Plaza parcel to the Edina Housing Foundation for the development of affordable housing. Cancel the proposed August 18, 2020 public hearing for Resolution 2020-71. Direct staff to take the necessary actions to more formally include the Duggan Plaza parcels into the City’s land use and park regulatory systems, recognizing the status of the parcels as land reserved for public park purposes in the future. INTRODUCTION: At the July 21, 2020, City Council meeting, the Council considered a request from staff to conduct two public hearings that would enable a proposal to sell a City-owned parcel in Duggan Plaza to the Edina Housing Foundation for development as two single-family affordable homes. At the request of staff, Council approved a motion to table the two public hearings to your August 18, 2020 meeting. The first public hearing was to vacate unnecessary City utility easements on the parcel. Staff and City Attorney have determined this public hearing is no longer necessary because of further research into the acquisition of the land. This public hearing was been withdrawn and canceled by staff. The second public hearing was on the question of whether to sell a Duggan Plaza parcel to the Housing Foundation. When the action item for this matter was included on the Council’s meeting agenda for the July 21 meeting, it generated a great deal of public interest and scrutiny. Some of that scrutiny was enlightening in that it made staff aware of additional historical facts about the Duggan Plaza parcel. The additional facts contributed by residents and additional research by staff have yielded a full view of this proposal, which has led me to recommend the City cease any further action on it. On March 11, 1963, the Edina Village Council unanimously approved a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION FOR ACQUISITION OF TAX FORFEIT ED LAND FOR PARK P URPOSES. The Duggan Plaza land was conveyed by the State of Minnesota to the Village of Edina on April 19, 1963. The conveyance of the parcel included a deed restriction that the land be used exclusively for “park purposes,” which was consistent with intent of the Village Council’s March 11 resolution purchasing the land. Clearly, the Duggan Plaza parcels were originally acquired for park purposes. Residents of the neighborhood surrounding the Duggan Plaza parcels have relied on this original intention for more than 50 years. The City’s 2008 Comprehensive Guide Plan classifies this land as “Open Space and Parks." While the City Council has the legal authority to convert City-owned park land to a different use, doing so in this circumstance would be a break of trust and faith between the City and the neighborhood. I do not recommend that. I do recommend the following actions to the Council: 1. Accept the staff’s request to withdraw the proposal and recommendation (Resolution 2020-71) to sell the Duggan Plaza parcel to the Edina Housing Foundation for the development of affordable housing. 2. Cancel the proposed August 18, 2020 public hearing for Resolution 2020-71. 3. Direct staff to take the necessary actions to more formally include the Duggan Plaza parcels into the City’s land use and park regulatory systems, recognizing the status of the parcels as land reserved for public park purposes in the future. ATTACHMENTS: Description Duggan Plaza Deed Restriction Edina Village Council Minutes March 11, 1963; See Page 3 Staff Report Resolution 2020-71 Neighborhood Survey Department of Taxation - Form No. 966 (Public Use) STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION CONVEYANCE OF FORFEITED LANDS Issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 282.01, Subdivision 1) THIS INDENTURE, made this 19th day of April 1963 , between the State of Minnesota, as party of the first part, and Village of Edina, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation , as party of the second part, WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the land hereinafter described was duly forfeited to the State of Minnesota for the non- payment of taxes, and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 282.01, Subdivision 1, the party of the second part has applied to the Commissioner of Taxation for the conveyance of lands hereinafter described to be used by it exclusively for park purposes and, WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, has recommended to the Commissioner of Taxation by resolution adopted on the 9th. day of April 19 63, that such conveyance be made, NOW, THEREFORE, The State of Minnesota, pursuant to said laws and in consideration of the prem- ises, does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the party of the second part, forever, all the tracts or parcels of land lying and being in the County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, described as follows, to -wit: 1) Unnumbered circular tract in Duggan Plaza; (2) Unnumbered irregular tract South of Block 5 in Duggan Plaza; (3) Unnumbered irregular tract South :of Block 1 in Duggan Plaza; Brookview Heights lst Addition, all as shown on and according to the plat on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds, Hennepin County, Minnesota; also 4) Park and park approach and drainage wa7r in Block 7, Brookview Heights 2nd Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds, Hennepin County, Minnesota, TO HAVE AND TO HOLD THE SAME, together with all the hereditaments and appurtenances there- unto belonging or in anywise appertaining, to the said party of the second part so long as it shall con- tinue to use said land for the purposes aforesaid, and upon condition that if such use shall cease said land shall revert to the party of the first part as provided by law. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the State of Minnesota, party of the first part, has caused this deed to be executed in its name in the City of St. Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota, the day and year first above written. i In presence of: If 76e STATE OF MINNESOTA County of Ramsey STATE OF MINNESOTA ROLLAND F. HATFIELD Commissioner of Taxation winmy'lemmi- , ss. On this 19th day of April 19 _62, before me personally appeared ARTHUR C. ROEMER, acting for the Commissioner of Taxation of the State of Minnesota, under delegation f authority duly filed with the Secretafy of State, to me known to be the person who executed the foregoing conveyance in be- half of the State of Minnesota, and acknowledged that he executed the same i-T the free act and deed of said state pursuant to the statutes in such case made and pro- vided. EAAI COPELAND Notary Public, Ramsey County, Minn, 10Y Commission Expires Feb. 25, 1970, 956 I No-A2174-8 STATE DEED Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 282.01, Subdivision 1. STATE OF MINNESOTA TO' S(-3 4 OFFICE OF REGISTER OF DEEDS STATE OF MINNESOTA, County of I hereby certify that the within Deed was filed in this office for record on the day of A. D.19--, at o'clock m , and was duly recorded in Book of Deeds, on page Register of Deeds. By Deputy. I RANSFER ENTERtI APR 22 1963 ROBERT F. FITZSSIMMOrNS, AU0116k HENN CAOU, kY DEPUTV 4 3 /l1/6J 43 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL, HELD MONDAY, MARCH 11, 1963 AT 7:OO P,M. Members answering Rollcall were MacMillan, Rixe, Tupa and VanValkenburg. of Mayor Bredesen, Mr. VanValkenburg acted as Mayor Pro Tem. EIINUTES of the Special Meeting of February 23 and Regular Meeting of February 25, 1963, were apmoved as submitted, by Motion Rixe, seconded by Tupa and carried. In the absence PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO "MULTIPLE BESIDENCE" SECTION OF ZONING ORDINANCE CONTINUED FOR TWO WEEKS, Meeting of March 6, 1963', that the Proposed Amendment Zoning Ordinance draft of February 27, with revisions of March 6, be transmitted to the Council with recommendation for passager not been approved by the Village Attorney. Mr, Hyde stated the Planning Commission had been working on this for some time and had met with some of the builders in the area to discuss and clarify the tfbluZtipleResidence" amendment which raises the standards to make dwellings more sound proof and provide for more Living and storage space. Hite, Planning Director was out of town and had not as yet seen the document, Mr, Hyde suggested that the hearing be continued for two weeks, to March 25th Meeting, for continuance of Hearing to March 25 made by MacMillan, seconded by Rixe and carried. Mr, Hyde announced at this time that at the Planning Commission The document was drawn up Thursday and Friday (March 7 and 8) but as yet had As George Motion CONTRACT AWARDED FOR GOLF COURSE PLANT MATERIALS. showing receipt of bids on March 4, 1963, replied that bids had been taken on reduced sizes for shrubs and trees and the use of some village-grown plantings as indicated in the revised plans for Golf Course Plantings, The Park Board recommended award of the contract to Greguson's Nursery, low bidder on the Base Bid (no guarantee), at $19,862.00. and third-low bid was Minnesota Tree and Garden Service at $28,721.94, award of contract to low bidder; motion seconded by Mactlillan :and carried. Tabulation of Bids was presented, In .response to Mr, Tupals inquiry, Mrr Hyde Next-Low bid was Ray Jovdan, at $27,307,00; Tupa moved for REZONING OF PEARCE-OWNED TRIANGLE AT W.66TH ST. AND YORK AVENUE DISCUSSED, Mr, Hyde read from Attorney Schwartzbauer's letter of March 11, 1963 relative to' the rezoning of this property. the property, or to condemn it--and stated that the situation hadSbeen discussed with Messrs, Schwartzbauer and Hasselquist, attorneys €or the Village. Mr, Hyde suggested that Mr. Schwartzbauer be authorized to arrange a meeting with MY. Brill, who represents the Pearce interests, to see what could be worked out, and that a report be made to the Council at its next meeting, able with him, He exDlained that the Village two alternatives--to either rezone Mr. Brill was in the audience and stated this was agreed PETITION ACCEPTED FOR SANITARY SEWER FOR 5020 BLAKE ROAD, DR. A, SI SHEA. Petition was presented bearing the name of Dr, Shea only. Mr. Hyde reported the Village is working on plans to serve this area with sewer, and recommended that the petition be accepted, He also recommended installing watemains along with the sewer pnoject, and that the Village defer assessment of the watermain until such time as homes are connected to the water system. Mr, VanValkenburg's inquiry as to how close this would be to Hopkins' water, Mr, Tupa inquired as to whether sewer would be put in for all, and was Jnformed that this would be the case, Mr. Hyde showed Council area proposed to be served, in response to Motion to accept petition made by Rixe, seconded by Tupa and carried, EDINA REPRESENTATIVE ON BOARD OF "SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY" TO BE J. N, DALEN, FINANCE DIRECTOR, Mr, Hyde read letter from Mr, Kenneth If!. Person, Vice President of the Minneapolis Gas Company., acknowledging that the Uniform Gas Franchise has now been adopted by the required 66-2/3% of the total customers, and is, therefore, now in effect. of the Suburban Rate Authority should be chosen, Director, be appointed, since his accounting experience will'be a valuable asset, Roxe moved that Mr, J, N, Dalen, Finance Director, be the Village of Edha representative on the Board of the Suburban Rate Authority. Mr, Tupa seconded. Motion carried. Mr, VanValkenburg pointed out at this time that a representative for the Board Re suggested that J. N. Dalen, Finance Mr, ROGER FIMDELL PETITION FOR MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONING AT 4246 VALLEY VIEFT ROAD tabled by Planning Commission for further review. on the Planning Commission's recommendation of March 6, 1963, that request be tabled for further review, In the absence of Mr. Hite, Mr, Hyde reported STOW~PETITIONFOR MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONING (R6), AND ZONING ORDINANCE VARIANCE, TO HAVE PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 25, appli-for a 32-unit apartment building be approved, with a variance to be granted on the shortage of 1,400 square feet, and the property to be rezoned R6 Multiple Residence. At this time, Mr* Josiah Brill., representing petitioner E,= , Stow, asked that the CounciL recommend approval, subject to the adoption of the zoning ordinance, so that work might be expedited on the project; in 'other words, that the Council approve the zoning of this property in &-I principle, now. Mr. VanValkenburg asked Mr, Brill if he was simply assuming that the ordinance was going to be passed, about the effect produced in the event that the Council, should indicate approval before the Public Hearing was held on the ordinance. E&anning Commission recommended at meeting of March 6 that Mr, Hyde stated he was concerned Village Attorney,Hasselquist, stated 44 that any change in has been under theJonthispreviously I 3/11/63 zoning requires a public hearing. impression that the Planning Commission has had a public hearing and he believed that a11 involved property owners had been Mr, E. C. Stow told Council he notified- then. I&. Hyde suggested to Council that Public Hearing be held at the same time as that on the zoning ordinance amendfient, to Mr, Stow and Nr. Brill that Council must follow the advice of the Village Attorney, which is tohave a public hearing on March 25--and that any other course of action would not be fair to those attending the hearing. Hearing on ?%!arch25 made by Rixe, seconded by MacNillan and carried. Mr. VanValkenburg explained Motion for Public PETITION FOR R5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONING, VITH 60-UNIT, 44TORY APARTENT BUILDING ON SILTMORE PROPERTY AT HIGHVAY 169 AND N,53RD STREET TO HAVE PUSLIC HEARING MARCH 25, Planning Commission's t4arch 6th recommendationr-that application for 60-unit four story apartment be approved, and property be zoned R5 Multiple Residence, with the provision that proposed access on 53rd Street for loading be eliminated, was considered. same night as that of the zoning ordinance amendment, and Tupa moved for Public Hearing to be scheduled on March 25. UFir, VanValkenburg suggested this Public Hearing be scheduled for the Motion seconded by Rixe and carried. NELSON FARM REZONING TO HAVE NE\] HEARING MARCH 25, INCLUDING REZONING OF TRACT L TO OFFICE BUILDING DISTRICT, AND TRACT NN TO R4 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE DISTRICT, Planning Commission's March 6th recommendation, that the rezoning of Tract A to Office Building District be tabled until such time as the future of Cahill Road and a possible replace- ment of it to the west was settled, was considered, as was the recommendation that Tract L be zoned Office Building and Tract NN be zoned R4 Nultiple Residence, pointed out that the-Council on February 11 had not continued the public hearing on rezoning of the balance of the Nelson Farm, and that it would be necessary to have a new hearing on the entire matter, Mr, Hasselquist stated that the people must be notified of the intended action, Mr. Stow said he thought there had been a public hearing on these areas before; that notices had been sent and there had been no objection, Mr, VanValkenburg stated the hearing had not included these tracts and . that Mr. Stow must have reference to a neighborhood meeting and not a public hearing. It was moved by Rixe that a public hearing on the rezoning of the Nelson Farm, as recornmended by Planning Commission, for tlonday, March 25. MacMillan and carried It tias Motion seconded by PLAN FOR CAR WASH, HIGHIIAY #169 BETtlEEN KROGER AND STANDARD OIL were reviewed relative to Planning Commission's consideration thereon, on March 6. taken. No action HALLA NURSERY PROPERTY AT HIGHWAY 100 AND EDEN AVENUE BEING CONSIDERED FOR APARTMENT. consideration of an inquiry on suitability of the Halla Nursery property for a Council reviewed Planning Commission Ninutes of March 6, relative to 200-unit, high-rise apartment. No action taken. COUNCIL APPROVES I*lINNEAPOLIS STAR E TRIBUNE'S APPLICATION FOR BRANCH STATION AT VALLEY VIEW ROAD AND WOODDRLE AVENUE. recommendation that permission be granted to the 1-linneaoolis Star and Tribune to Council approved Planning Commission's have a temporary 12'&16' building placed south of Tedman's Store- a period of not more than two years. carried Motion allowing made by MacI4illan, seconded by Tupa and JENSEN FARM DEVELOPI.IENT BEING STUDIED BY COUNCIL. Commission's acceptance for study of a proposed platting of the Jensen Farm, with Council reviewed Planning multiple residence and single family areas, WALLACE KENNETH PETITION FOR REZONING AND PARKWIOD KNOLLS DEVELOPMENT REVIEWED Council reviewed proceedings of the Canmission on March 6th, relative to the petition of Hallace Kenneth for Rezoning of the Peterson Dairy Property and the objections of the Parkwood Knolls residents. No action taken, NEY PLAN PRESENTED TO COI~f~4ISSIONFOR SOUTHEAST CORNER, W.7OTH ST. AND CAHILL ROAD. Planning Commission's receipt of a new plan for this area was noted, COUNCIL ACQUIRES TAX DELINQUEBT LANDS FOR PARK PURPOSES, Council that under date of February 6, the Villaze received list of tax-forfeited lands from the County Board; that this had been investigated by the Board Board, which requests that four parcels be secured, all o€ them being in Brookview Beigfjts area and currently being used for public purposesI A resolution was recommended asking for the four parcels in Brookview Heights 1st and 2nd Additions, Park Director, was in the audience and explained location of said property. offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption: Mr, Hyde reported to Ken Rosland, Tupa . 453 /11/63 RESOLUTION DECLARING TAX DELINQUENT LANDS NON-CONSERVATION AND FOR SALE WHEREAS, The Village Council of the Village of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, has received from-ithe County Auditor of Hennepin County list of lands in said village which became the property of the State of Minnesota under the provisions of Law declaring the forfeiture of lands to the State for non-payment of taxes, which said list has been designated as Classification List tt553-Cff, February 6, 1963; and WHEREAS, each parcel of land described in said list has heretofore been classified by the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County, Minnesota as non-conservation land and the sale thereof has heretofore been authorized by said Board of County Commissioners: Minnesota Statutes for 1957, Section 282,01, Subd. 1, that the said classi- fication by said Board of County Commissionbrs of each parcel of land described in said list as non-conservation land be and the same is, hereby approved and that the sale of each such parcel of land be and the same is hereby approved. Motion for adoption of the Resolution was seconded by MacMillan, and on Rollcall, there were four ayes and no nays, as follows: Minnesota, a NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by said Village Council, acting pursuant to MacMillan, aye; Rixe, aye; Tupa, And Tupa then offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION FOR ACQUISITION OF TAX FORFEITED LAND FOR PARK PURPOSES BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of Edina, Minnesota, that the Village Attorney be authorized and directed to file "Application by Governmental Subdivision for .Conveyance of Tax-Forfeited Lands ," for the following property contained in Hennepin County Auditor's List "533-Cf1, said Droperty to be used by the Villa5e of Edina for Park purposes: Brookview Heights 1st Addition - Plat No, 74280 Parcel No. 38394 - 1955 Parcel No, 38395 - 1955 Parcel No, 38396 - 1955 Unnumbered circular tract in Duggan Plaza Unnumbered irregular tract South of Block 5 in Duggan Plaza Unnumbered irregular trac% South of Block 1 in Duggan Plaza Brookview Heights 2nd Addition - Plat No. 74281 Park and park approach and drainage way Parcel No, 38397 - 1955 7 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor Pro Tem and Clerk of this Village be, and hereby are, authorized and directed to sign said application on behalf of the Village of Edina Motion for adoption of the Resolution was seconded by MacMillan, and on Rollcall there were four ayes and no nays, as follows: MacMillan, aye; Rixe, aye; Tupa, .. -- I- RESOLUTION ADOPTED PERMITTING CONVE@CE OF VACATED WINDSOR AVENUE~~I AS a supple- ment to action taken by Council on Qanuary 14, 1963, (Page 5, Minute Book 26)Tupa offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION PERMITTING CONVEYANCE OF "VACATED WINDSOR AVENUE, SUBJECT TO CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS THEREON BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of Edina, as follows: 1, That the following described property which-includes a present building lot and a part of said vacated Windsor Avenue shall be considered a proper building lot: A11 that part of Lot 1, Block 6, Westchester Knolls Addition, and that portion of Windosr Avenue formerly knokmsas Westchester Avenue described as follows: 'Commencing at the Northwest corner of said lot, thence South to the Southwest corner, thence East 128.83 feet to a point on the Northerly Line of the Minneapolis, St. Paul, Rochester and Dubuque Electric Traction Company right-of-way (now knovm as Minneapolis Northfield and Southern Railroad), thence Northeasterly along the Northerly line of said Railroad right-of-way 12,8 feet, thence Northwesterly 146.38 feet to a point on the Northerly line of said lot distant 77 feet East from the Northwest corner, thence West 77 feet to the point of beginning,' It 3/11/63 2. That the following described property contiguous with Lot 5, Block 2, Richmond Hills 2nd Addition may be conveyed by )froAlden L. Allen, but shall not be considered a proper building lot, All that part of Lot 1, Block 6, Vestchester Knolls Addition and that portion of Hindsor Avenue, formerly known as Nestchester Avenue, lyinq east of the following described tract: 'All that part of Lot 1, Block 6, Westchester Knolls Addition and tha? part of Windsor Avenue, formerly known as Westchester Avenue , described as follows: lCommencing at the Northwest cofner of said lot, thence south to the southwest corner, thence east 128.81 feet to a point on the northerly line of the Minneapolis, St. Paul, Rochester and Dubuque Electric Traction Company right-of-way (now known as Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railroad), thence north- easterly along the northerly line of said railroad right-of-way 12.8 feet, thence northwesterly 146.38 feet to a point on the northerly line of said lot distant 77 feet east of the northwest corner, thence west 77 feet to the point of beginning.' That the following described property contiguous with Lot 4, Block 2, Richmond Hills 2nd Addition, may be conveyed by Mr, Allen but shall not be considered a proper building lot, A* & 6 3. All that part of Windsor Avenue, formerly known as WestChester Avenue , now vacated , in Westchester Knolls Addition according to the map or plat thereof on file or of record in the Office of the Register? of Deeds in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: That portion lying easterly of the following described line: A line drawn southeasterly as an extension of the lot line between Lots Four (4) and Five (51, of Block Two (21, Richmond Hills 2nd Addition, according to the map or plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for Hennepin County, to a point on the northerly line of the Minneapolis, St, Paul, Rochester and Dubuque Electric Traction Company right-of-way (not? known as Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railroad). That any conveyance of said property shall contain the restriction concerning any part of the vacated part of Windsor Avenue, reserving a perpetual easement to the Village of Edina for the care and maintenance of all utilities located in said roadway and, further, that the Village of Edina shall have the right of direct supervision and control over the placing of any fill or the grading of this property by the abutting landokmers-all as set forth in that certain "Resolution Vacating Street" adopted by the Village Council of Edina on November 22, 1954. 4. BMotionforadoptionoftheResolutionwassecondedbyRixe, and on Rollcall there were three ayes and one not voting, as follows: MacMillan, aye; Rixe, aye; Tupa, PUBLIC HEARING FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT ON XEgES AVENUE BETFIEEN W.54TH AND H,62ND STREETS, SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 25. proposed Street Improvement, involving surfacing, curb and gutter, and sidewalk, It was redommended that Public Hearing on this be scheduled for Monday, March 25, and Tupa so moved, carried. Motion seconded by Rixe and PUBLIC- HEARING SCHEDULED FOR HARCH 25 ON WATEREIAIN, TRUCK AND LATERAL FOR NORTHWEST SECTION, Section, involving a Trunk Main, and Laterals to serve a considerable area. recornmended that Public Hearing on this project be shceduled for March 25, so that work might be done this summer if the improvement is approved; and Tupa offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption: BE IT RESOLVED by the CoxLof the Village of Edina: The Village Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminapy report as to the feasibility of the proposed Watermain Improvement described in the Fom of Notice of Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improve- ment, said report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the Village Clerk, Edina Village Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested Report was made relative to the proposal for Hater Service for the Northwest Nr. Hyde RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED WATEFMAIN IMPROVEHENT 1. 2. This Council shall meet on Monday, March 25 , 1963, at 7:OO P.E.I., in the in said proposed improvement. 3. The Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper once a week for two successive weeks, the second o€ which publications is to be not less than three days from date of said meeting, which notice shall be in substantially the following form: 3 /11/63 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED TRUNK AND LATERAL WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL willmeet at the Edina Village Hall on Monday, March 25, 1963, at 7:OO P.M,, to consider the following proposed improvements to be constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Laws of 1953, Chapter 398, of said improvements is estimated by the Village as set forth below: 1, CONSTRUCTION OF VILLAGE TRUNK GJATERMAIN, LATERAL The approximate cost ESTIMATED COST CONNECTIONS THERETO, AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING: Commencing at a point on the West line of Parkwood Rd, said point being 251.11 feet, more or less, North of the South line of Sec. 30,T,117,R,21; thence SWly at an interior angle measured tothe right of 66O 00' from the PJest line of Parkwood Road; thence along said line a distance of 117,3' to the beginning of a curve, said curve having a delta of 22O and a radius of 303,82' a distance of 116.66'; thence Westerly along tangent of last described curve a distance of 616'; thence North- erly at right angles a distance of 1030'; thence NWly at a deflection angle of 44O 15' a distance of 924'; thence Northerly 30' East and parallel to the West line of Sec. 30,T.l17,R. 21 a distance of 2126' to a point 10' N, of the center line of County Road #18; thence East along Maloney Ave, to Arthur Street; Jackson Avenue from Maloney Ave, to Belmore Lane; Belmore Lane from Jackson Aver to 100' West and the5e terminating. $159,803.31 2, CONSTRUCTION OF VILLAGE LATERAL HATERMAIN AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING : Washington Ave, from Maloney Ave. to North Village Limits Adams Ave, from Maloney Ave. to North Village Limits Jefferson Ave,. from Maloney Ave, to North Village Limits Madison Ave. from Maloney Ave. toNorth Village Limits Monroe Ave, from Maloney Ave, to North Village Limits Third St, from Washington Aver to Nonroe Ave, Third St. from VanBuren Ave, to Harrison Ave, Belmore Lane from Monroe Aver to 220 feet East Belmore Lane from IJIackson Aver to VanBuren Ave. VanBuren Ave. from Maloney Ave. to North Village Limits Harrison Ave, from Maloney Aver to North Village Limits Tyler Aver from Maloney Ave, to Belmore Lane Arthur Street from Maloney Aver North to cul-de-sac Belmore Lane from Harrison Ave. to Griffit Street Dearborn Street from Belmore Lane to 400' North Arthur St. from Belmore Lane to 400' North Griffit St, from Maloney Ave. to North Village Limits Blake Rd. from Maloney Ave, to North Village Limits Flaloney Ave, from Arthur St, to Vest line of Block 9, John Street from Maloney Ave, to 420' North Kresse .Circle from Maloney Ave. to cul-de-sac Spruce Road from Griffit St. to alley between Blocks 7 John St, from Belmore Lane to Spruce Road Grove Place from Belmore Lane to Soruce Road Alley between Blocks 7 and 8, Mendelssohn Addn. from Belmore Lane from John St, to East line of Sec.30, Mendelssohn Addn , and 8, Mendelssohn Addn, Belmore Lane to Spruce Road T 117 ,R. 21 $247,378 e 88 The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed Trunk Watermain under 1above includes all lots and tracts o€ land within the following described boundaries: Commencing at the NW corner of Sec.30 ,T.117 ,R.21; th, Ely alone the North Village limits to the NE corner of Sec,30,T.l17,R,21; th, Sly along the E. line of said SecI to the center line of Maloney Ave. ; th, Wly along the center line of Plaloney Ave. to the E. line of Mendelssohn Rearrangement of Block 23 extended; th. Sly tothe SE corner of Lot 1, Rearrangement of Block 23, Mendelssohn; th, Wly to the SW corner of Lot 2, Rearrangement of Block 23, Mendelssohn; th. S. to the NE corner of Lot 2, Block 1, Mendelssohn Sorensen Replat; th. Wly to the NW corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Mendelssohn Sorensen Replat; th, Sly to the NE corner of Replat of part of Block 22, Mendelssohn; th. Wly to the NW corner of ReDlat of part of Block 22, Mendelssohn; th, Sly 70 feet along the W. line of Repdat of part of Block 22, Mendelssohn; th, Wly to the NE corner of Lot 6, Block 1, Victorsen's Interlachen; th, Wly to the NW corner of Lot 5, Block 1, Victorsen's interlachen; th. Nly to the NE comer of Lot 1, Block 1, Victorsen's Interlachen; th. Ely to the SE corner part of Block 21, Mendelssohn; th, Nly to the SE corner of Lot 3, Block 1, Mendelssohn Addn. Gross Replat; th, Nly along the W. line of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Mendelssohn Addn, Gross Replat to the center 48 i 3/11/63 ". lime of Maloney Ave. ; th, Wly along the center line of Maloney Ave, to the W. line of Griffis Sub. of Block 18 extended; th. Sly along the W, line of Griffis Sub. of Block 18, to the SE corner of Lot 7, 1U.llards Sub. of Block 17, fiendel- ssbhnj th. Wly along the S. line of Lot 7, Willards Sub, of Block 17, Mendelssohn, and Illy along the S, line of Lot 4, Block 1, Blanche Addn. to the SB corner of Lot 4, Block 1, Blanche Addn,; th. Sly to the NE corner of Lot 5, Block 1, Hanson's 3rd Addn.; th. Wly to the NU comer of Lot 7, Block 1, Hanson's 3rd Addn.; th. Sly along the F7. line of Hanson's 3rd Addn. to the center line of Waterman Ave, extended; th. at a bearing of S. 240 13' 40" :?. a distance of 219.31' ; th, Sly and parallel toWaterman Ave, extended a distance of 330' to the center line of VanBuren Ave. extended; th. S. 460' to the S. line of the NW1/4 of Sec.30,T.117, R.21; th,Ely along the S, line of said NkJ1/4 to center of Sec,30,T1117,R.21; th. Sly along the E,line of the SWl/4 of Sec,30,T,117,R.21 to 215' N, of the SE corner of SV1/4 of Sec,30,T.l17,R.21; th.NWly,T.lly and SWy parallel to and 215' N. ,W,, and Illy of the center line of Parkwood Rd, to the NW corner of the NE1/4 of the NHl/4, of Sec.31,T.l17,R,21; th,Wly along the N. line of Sec.31,T.117,R.21 to the NU cornel. of Sec.31,T.l17,R,21; th. N. along center line of County Road No. 18 to point of beginning. The area proposed tobe assessed for the cost of the proposed Lateral Connections to the Trunk Watermain under 1above inc ud s Lots 1thru 13 incl., Block 13, and Nendelssohn Addn.; Lots I, 2, 3, and 4, Block 1, Hanson's 2nd Addn,; Lot 1, tEllard's Sub, of Block 17, Nendelssohn; Lot 2, Block 2, Davies 1st Addn,; Parcel #0375 and Parcel H0520 in the S1/2 of Sec, 30,T.117,R.21; Tracts A and B, R.L.S. #246; N1/2 Sec,30 ,T.117,R.219 The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed Lateral Watermain under 2 above includes all lots and tracts of land abutting the streets proposed to be improved by the construction of the La Motion for adoption of the Resolution was seconded by Rixe, and on Rollcall there were four ayes and no nays, as follows: Lots 14 thru 26 incl,, Block 14, all ih/ ifffkeapolis Heights Addition; Block 16, 6d??&&8tgym%%N Village Clerk WacMillan, aye; Rixe, aye; Tupa, aye; and lkenburg, aye; and the Resolution was COUNCIL ADOPTS RESOLUTION RELATIVE TO JgCIAL COMPENSATION. following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION Tupa offered the I \WEREAS, the present salary for the Municipal Judge of the Municipal Court of Edina is set by the Legislature at $6,300 per year, and VHEREAS, the Edina Village Council in adopting its budget for the year 1963 provided for a salary of $7,200 for the Municipal Judge: NO!?, THEREFORE, E3E IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of Edina, that Senator Bergerud and Representative Bang be advised that funds are available tomeet the compensation proposed in special legislation requested on this matter, Notion for adoption of Resolution was seconded by MacMillan, and on Rollcall there RESOLJJTION ADOPTEDFOR ESTABLISHMENT OF ~~DINAFIREMEN'S RELIEF ASSOCIATIOV. Mr . Hyde informed the Council it would be a'dvisable to have a special bill introduced in the Legislature in order to resolve the problem between bERA and regular firemen who are members of the Firemen's Relief Association, present PERA system, full-time volunteer firemen are not covered because of their being members of the Village volunteer fund and for that reason the Village had been withholding funds from PERA, follows one Richfield had passed at the last Legislature covering its Firemen's Relief Association, since their law did not so provide, the bill proposed by Edina. PERA is also requesting a change in its law so that the firemen could be covered by both PERA and the Relief Association, law is so changed, then it would not be advisable tohave the special Edina bill- passed. He stated that under the Nr, Hyde pointed out that the proposed bill Richfield had not recovered funds paid into PERA by the Village A provision requiring repayment is included in If the PERA Rixe offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATIVE TO THE ESTABLISHHENT OF THE EDINA FIREMEN'S RELIEF ASSOCIATION WHEREAS, members of the Edina Fire Department ape not eligible for benefits from the Public Employees Retirement Association because said firemen have continued tobe members of the Edina Volunteer Firemen's pension, and WHEREAS, the Public Employees Reitrement Association has insisted that although the firemen are not covered, the Villao,e of Edina deduct the employees' contributions 7 -I 11 3/11/63 49 and pay the employers' contributions, the same as for any other municipal employee, and ment of legislation which created an independent firemen's pension fund for that Village and exempted its members from the Public Employees Retirement Association, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Village of Edina requests Senator Alf Bergerud and Representative Otto Bang to introduce and secure passage of "A Bill for an act relating to the Village of Edina and to its Firemen's Relief Association, providing for compulsory membership by Fire Department personnel in such association; providing for compulsory contributions thereto by such personnel; providing for compulsory contributions by the Village of Edina as employer of such personnel; and describing certain limitations as to benefits for su.ch personnel" a Motion for adoption of Resolution was seconded by TQpa, and on Rollcall there were WHEPSAS, the Village of Richfield at the 1961 Legislature secured the enact- ( I attention to the amendments to the present law, proposed by the PERA Board. Among these are: 1, The salary base on which employer and employee contributions are to be based would be raised from $4,800 to $6,000 annually. This woudd also provide that the additional 2-1/2% employer contribution trould be based on $6,600 per year, to limit their salary base to $4,800. of benefits under the more liberal pre-1957 formula, be applicable to members as of June 30, 1953 rather than only tothose who had ten years of service on that date, would be made directly by the County Auditor, Present members of the fund would be allowed 2. The bill would provide that the savings clause allowing the computation 3, The bill would provide that the tax levy for employer contributions Mr, Hyde pointed out that the Public Retirement Study Commission in its 1961 Study Report recommended against each of the proposed changes, and he advised the Council that if these changes were passed by the Legislature the Village would be liable to pay considerably more money into PERA than at present. the following Resolution and moved its adoption: Tupa offered RESOLUTION OPPOSING CERTAIN CHANGES IN PERA LAW WHEREAS, House File 647 and Senate File 670 makes numerous changes to the law under which the Public Employees Retirement Association operates, some of which would be of considerable cost to the Village of Edina and its employees, and WHEREAS, the Public Retirement Study Commission in its 1961 Report recommended against certain of the changes, and TJHEREAS , the Public Employees Retirement Association has been unwilling to provide for employer representation on its Board, and WHEREAS, no proof has been provided by the Public Employees Retirement Association that the changes it suggests will not further increase the.actuaria1 deficit of the fund, tohaving the following changes made in the Public Employees Retirement Law: Allowing the salary base on which employer and employee contributions are to be based tobe raised from $4,800 to 6,000 annually with the additional 2-1/2% employer contribution to be based on $6,600 per year, benefits under the more liberal pre-1957 formula to be applicable to emembers as of June 30, 1957, rather than only to those who had ten years of allowable service on that date. Providing that the tax levy for employer contributions to the fund be made directly by the County Auditor and not by the governmental subdivision concerned, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Village of Edina is firmly opposed 1) 2) Allowing the savings clause which provides for computing 3) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Sgnator Bergerud and Representative Bang be requestec to oppose the above proposed changes and any other changes which are not accoqnpanied by proof that they will not further increase the deficit of the Public Employees Retirement Fund. Notion for adoption of Resolution was seconded by Rixe, and on RolLcall there were four ayes and no nays, as follows: MacMillan, aye; Rixe, aye; Tupa, aye; and- 50 3 /11/63 COUNCIL ASKS FOR LOkIER SPEED LIMIT ON NORMANDALE ROAD FRON VW68TH STREET, SOUTH. snager Hyde referred to letter received from The Reverend Roger R, Anderson of Christ Presbyterian Church, requesting reduction of speed to 40 PPH in this area and a squad car patrol on Sunday mornings to alleviate traffic congestion during services, was of the opinion that we once again request the State Highway Department to make the speed limit 40 HPH on Highway 100 to a point south of 70th Street. Macf-lillan pointed out that such a reduction in speed would benefit not just one church, but five in the area; that there was extremely heavy traffic at 70th and Normandale between 9 and 12 on Sunday mornings , involving these five churches . Elr. Tupa stated that the 50 MPH speed limit had been in effect before Lake Edina additions had been developed, It was also suggested that we request installation of traffic signals at 70th inasmuch as the overpass will not be completed for several years. In regard to the request for patrolling of the area during Sunday morning services, Mr. Hyde said the Police Department does not have the available manpower to provide such service for all churches desiring it , 14acMillan offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption: Mr, Hyde read from Chief Bennett's report of February 28, in which he Mr. I RESOLUTION REQUESTING STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT TO LOVER SPEED LIMIT ON HIGHWAY 100 AND TO INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNALS ON HIGHWAY 100 AT 70TH STREET WHEREAS, seven traf?ic accidents have occurred in a recent three month period on Highway 100 at 70th Street, compared with none during a similar period one year ago, and involved recommends that the speed limit on Highway 100 be reduced from 50 miles per hour to 40 miles per hour from just south of 66th Street to approximately Trillium Lane south of 70th Street, and to develop rapidly, which will result in constantly increasing traffic, and WHEREAS, the in stallation of traffic signals at 70th Street and Highway LOO is considered tobe advisable, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of Edina that the Commissioner of Highways, State of Minnesota, be requested to lower the speed limit on Highway LOO from 50 miles per hour to 40 miles per hour from just south of 66th Street to approximately Trillium Lane south of 70th Street, and to cooperate with the Village in the installation of traffic signals at the intersection of 70th Street and Highway LOO, Motion for adoption of Resolution was seconded by Tupa, and on Rollcall there WHEREAS, the Edina Police Department after a thorough study of all factors WEREAS, the area in the vicinity of 70th Street and Highway 100 is continuing ._ I and poolhalls, which emanates from the establishment of a billiard room by the Biltmore Bowling establishment. It was pointed out that at present the Village has no such ordinance, was entirely separate from the service of beer, and Mr. Hyde informed him this is the case. Manager Hyde recommended that the Village should also have an ordinance covering the regulation of dance studios in the Village, and both these items were referred to Village Attorney Hasselquist, VILLAGE-OWNED IT4PROVENENT BONDS TO BE SOLD. Narch 7, asking for authority to sell some $400,000 of Village-owned, previously issued Improvement Bonds , part of which funds would be re-invested in Government securities and part used for temporary financing, was reviewed. that the School must sell bonds next month; that this proposed Village sale tltould not interfere with the School sale, and would provide funds for financing until next fall. in the event bids received are too far from estimates the Council would be notified, I5r. Tupa moved that Mr, Dalen be authorized to proceed with sale as scheduled. Motion seconded by Hr. Rixe and unanimously carried, STUDENTS ACKNOWLEDGED * of a number of ninth-grade students in the audience, and the Council members and Village personnel present were introduced. I-Ir. Hasselquist asked if the Biltmore billiard operation Finance Director Dalen's report of It was noted Mr, Hyde informed the Council that bids would be taken !*¶arch12, and At this time, Councilman MacPGllan acknowledged the presence 3/?+JL/63 : : Kf COUNCIL APPROVES PROPOSED 44TH STREET-BROOKSIDE SCHEDULE, FIITH REQUEST FOR ONE ADDITIONAL TRIP. schedule from the Village of Morningside this afternoon. The new proposed Manager Hyde had received the proposed bus com?any schedule would cut the number of round trips from 24 to 12 and would provide for the first bus leaving Brookside at 6:48 a.m., which is about the same time they start now, The schedule was read to the Council, and Mr, VanValkenburg suggested that perhaps one more trip could be scheduled some time during the noon hour to alleviate the lapse of approximately six hours without a bus, Lat the Last Monday night meeting of the Morningside Council, which he was unable to attend because of the necessity of being at a Park Board meeting, and although he had been informed prior to the meeting that a number of Edina residents were concerned and planned to attend the Morningside meeting, only one -person -from 'Edina was present. Mr. Hyde reported that this matter had been considered MANAGER COMPLIMENTED ON LETTER TO MOODY'S, complimented Manager Hyde on his excellent letter and report of March 7, 1963 to Moody's Investors' Service relative tothe Village's present and prospective non-residential tax bask, At this point Councilman Tupa CLAIMS- PAID. Pre-List dated March 11: 4,057.40; Park, Papk Const, E SGim Pool, $4,241,26; Water Fund, $306,82; Liquor Fund, $28,400.19; Sewer Rental Fund, $60.97; Poor Fund, $449.16- TOTAL $48,785'59, was seconded by Rixe and carried, Tupa's motion for payment of the following Claims, all as per General Fund, $11,269,79~-ConstructionFund, The agenda s having been covered seconded by Tupa and carried. MacMillan moved for adjournment .. Motion Adjkqrnment at 8:13 P.M. August 18, 2020 Mayor and City Council Stephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2020-71 Authorizing Conveyance of City Owned Property to the Edina Housing Foundation Information / Background: The Edina Housing Foundation (“Foundation”), an independent 501(c)3 nonprofit corporation, proposes buying a City owned parcel at Abercrombie Drive and Duggan Plaza combined with portions of the streets on either side that need to be vacated (“Property”) for $1.00. The Foundation’s intent is to create entry level ownership opportunities for households who either want to move to Edina or transition to homeownership from rental. The cost of housing is a barrier for many people to move to Edina. These people may be working in the City and contributing to the quality of residents’ lives such as lab techs, nurses or aids, senior housing employees, day care providers, teachers and teachers’ aids, grocery store clerks, etc. Many of these employees are deemed essential during the pandemic, yet they cannot afford to own a home here. The cost and value of single-family ownership housing has been increasing annually since the Great Recession, with the number of affordable or entry level homes decreasing. The 2020 Maxfield Comprehensive Housing Market Analysis for the City of Edina (“Maxfield Study”) determined that there is a demand for up to 60 affordable or entry-level single-family homes. Yet, the largest barriers to developing new affordable single-family houses is the limited availability of land and land cost. How Minneapolis and St. Paul address this issue is to sell publicly owned land to affordable housing developers at a reduced cost. Edina has a one-time opportunity to support the development of entry-level single family homes through the sale of the Property. According to the 2020 Maxfield Study, between 2008 and 2018 the city provided 872 permits for new single-family houses. The average price of the teardown was $421,420, which were replaced with houses valued, on average, at $1,165,786. In October of 2019, the average list price of a previously occupied home was $799,000 and for a new home it was $1,462,450. The cost of housing is the context for the 2019 Quality of Life Survey, where Edina ranked lower than other Minnesota communities in the area of availability of affordable quality housing with only 32% rating this as excellent or good. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Opportunity to Address Housing Demand Edina has only one lot that is appropriate and available for the development of affordable single-family ownership housing. The other 38 City own parcels are either in flood zones, have easements running through them, have a watermain or other infrastructure, or unbuildable terrain. The Property at Duggan Plaza and Abercrombie is relatively flat, is nestled between two single family homes, with the rear of the lot at Normandale road. This Property was once a median like what is in Duggan Plaza. This is an extension of Duggan Plaza that was not formally vacated but grassed over. The lot is approximately 133 feet deep and 102.59 feet wide. The lot area is 13,618 square feet. The Property provides an opportunity to develop housing that is achievable to households with incomes at or below 120% of the Area Median Income (roughly $120,000). Although a Deed Restriction was placed on the Property in 1963, according to Minnesota Statute 282.01 Subd. 1d(d), the restriction was nullified after 30-years, in 1993. The Property now has clean title and is zoned R1 for residential use. Edina Housing Foundation Proposal Once the Foundation has site control, they would undergo the following process: • Request a platting of the median with the vacated right of ways. • Submit a Request for Proposals to affordable single-family housing developers. • Select a developer with the best experience, capacity and demonstrated outcomes to fulfill the housing requirements for this Property. • Require house design to complement existing neighborhood. • Developer would hold a community meeting to gather input on proposed design. • The houses will be sold to an income qualified homeowner: 80% to 120% of AMI (~$120,080) • Restrictions will be placed on the property to keep affordable for as long as legally possible. The Foundation has not requested that a prospective Developer hold a community meeting before now as neither the Foundation nor a Developer has any development rights to the Property. Once the Council Agrees to convey the Property, Staff can work with the legal counsel on preparing a Purchase Agreement that would require the Foundation select a Developer through a competitive proposal process. The selected Developer would then develop a plan and meet with the Community for feedback. The City could maintain ownership of the Property until after community meetings are held and the development plans receive regulatory approvals from the Planning Commission and City Council. Rationale For Two Single Family Homes The Edina Housing Foundation would like to explore splitting the lot to create two single family ownership opportunities. The lot is wide at 103’ and according to housing developers is wide enough for two homes. A survey has been completed to determine the median width and depth of neighboring lots. The Median depth is 133’, which is the same has Property in question, and the average width is 88’ which is 15-feet STAFF REPORT Page 3 narrower than the Property in question. Dividing the lot into two parcels will require a variance and may be controversial. There may be concerns that the new houses will not be to scale of the existing homes, or that the new homes may increase traffic in the area. Yet, one of the restrictions Edina has for the creation of affordable housing is strict land use regulations that call for large minimum lot sizes. According to “Mapping Prejudice” and The Color of Law, cities would create barriers based on wealth as a proxy to reinforce racial barriers. This is an opportunity to ease those barriers that keep people out rather than welcoming people in. Resolution No. 2020-71 The attached Resolution authorizes the sale of the Property to the Edina Housing Foundation subject to negotiating a Purchase Agreement to be approved by the City Council at a later date. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-71 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY TO THE EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION WHEREAS The Edina City Council (the “Council”) after proper public notice, held a hearing at approximately 7:00 P.M. on August 18, 2020 with regard to the sale of the following parcels of land (the “Land”): That part of unnumbered irregular tract south of Block 1 in Duggan Plaza, “Brookview Heights 1st Addition”, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying west of the line drawn from the southeast corner of Lot 31, Block 1, “Brookview Heights 1st Addition” to the northeast corner of Lot 9, Block 1, Brookview Heights 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. AND That part of vacated road, Duggan Plaza, as dedicated in “Brookview Heights 1st Addition”’ Hennepin County, Minnesota lying south of the unnumbered irregular tract south of Block 1, “Brookview Heights Additions” and between the southerly extension of the west line of lot 31, Block 1, “Brookview Heights 1st Addition” to the south line of said Addition and a line drawn from the southeast corner of said Lot 31 to the northeast corner of Lot 9, Block 1 Brookview Heights 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. AND The south half of that portion of vacated road, Duggan Plaza, as dedicated in “Brookview Heights 1st Addition”, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying north of the unnumbered irregular tract south of Block 1, “Brookview Heights 1st Addition” and between the southerly extension of the west of Lot 31, “Brookview Heights 1st Addition” to the south line of said Addition and the line drawn from the southeast corner of said Lot 31 to the northwest corner of Lot 9, Block 1 Brookview Heights 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota WHEREAS, the Council hereby concludes that all the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.029 regarding the sale of the Land have been satisfied. BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council for the City of Edina, Minnesota (the “City”) as follows: The Council authorizes the sale of the Land the Edina Housing Foundation subject to negotiating a purchase agreement with the Foundation which must be approved by the City Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED City staff is authorized and directed to work with Campbell Knutson, P.A. to prepare all legal documents including a Purchase Agreement to be reviewed and approved by the City Council at a future date. Adopted by the Edina City Council this 18th day of August 2020. ATTEST: _______________________________ _______________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Chair STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 21, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this __________ day of ___________________, 2020. City Clerk Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: IX.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:MJ Lamon, Community Engagement Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Approve 2020-2021 Student Commission Appointments Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion approving student commissioners with a term starting 9/1/20 and ending 9/1/21. INTRODUCTION: A staff report provides a quick summary and the selected appointments for student commissioners. Council Member Anderson will provide an update. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: 2020-2021 Student Appointments August 14, 2020 Mayor & City Council MJ Lamon, Community Engagement Coordinator 2020-2021 Student Commission Appointments Information / Background: This year the City received 51 applications for student commission positions. There are 16 commission seats available for student members every year. Council Member Ron Anderson and community volunteer Jan Seidman interviewed the applicants on July 29 and August 4. The following are the recommended appointments to start 9/1/20 and end 9/1/21: Commission Appointees Arts & Culture Commission - Shreya Konkimalla - Lauren Piela - Tiffany Shen Community Health Commission - Eva DiSimone - Isadora Li - Elizabeth Mullen Energy & Environment Commission - Ana Martinez - Alexa Densmore - Peter Mans Heritage Preservation Commission - Arjun Maheshwari - Hayden Pronley - Mike Lee Human Rights & Relations Commission - Francesca Lichtenberger - Sabeehudeen Mirza - Magnus Borene Parks & Recreation Commission - Jack Sorem - Will Nahlovsky - Nick Mork Planning Commission - Sophie Cullen - Myra Han Transportation Commission - Nihar Atri - Anand Khariwala - Anna Clark STAFF REPORT Page 2 Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: IX.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Resolution 2020-80: Implementing the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution 2020-80 implementing the 2018 Comprehensive Plan update. INTRODUCTION: The Metropolitan Council reviewed and approved the City's 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update on June 24, 2020. City staff and community members have been working since 2016 on an update to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. The process to update the comprehensive plan, established by the Edina City Council, included more than 180 meetings, including regular work sessions by the Planning Commission’s Comprehensive Plan Task Force, large-group public meetings, smaller community meetings in specific areas of the city (such as in the areas surrounding the elementary schools), listening sessions (small meetings held in response to invitations by community organizations or neighborhood groups), intergenerational dialogue with residents and other stakeholders, as well as ample opportunity to submit comments on the plan through the City's Better Together page. The City Council approved the comprehensive plan at its December 3, 2019 meeting. After it was approved it was submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and approval. The Met Council required edits/changes to the City's submitted plan: Edina 2040 CPU Incomplete for Review Edina 2040 CPU Incomplete for Review 2nd Edina 2040 Met Council Complete for Review Edina 2040 CPU-Notice of Council Action Met Council Committee Report Met Council Comment Tracker Document Below is a list of redlined chapters that highlight the changes that were made in response to the Met Council. Land Use Chapter Housing Chapter Transportation Chapter Water Resources Chapter Now that it has been reviewed and approved by the Metropolitan Council, the City Council is asked to formally adopt the 2018 Comprehensive Plan update. The public review and formal comment period on the comprehensive plan concluded April 8, 2019. All comments were received and either addressed or acknowledged in the plan. 2018 Comprehensive Plan To view more information on the 2018 Comprehensive Plan update and to view all of the individual Comp Plan Chapters, visit Better Together Edina. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2020-80 Staff & Consultant Report:Implementing the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update Move Up Memorandum from Met Council Staff Regarding Edina's Population Projections RESOLUTION NO. 2020 – 80 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2040 CITY OF EDINA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE, AND THE COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN, A COMPILATION OF POLICY STATEMENTS, GOALS, STANDARDS, AND MAPS FOR GUIDING THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL UNIT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes section 473.864 requires each local governmental unit to review and, if necessary, amend its entire comprehensive plan and its fiscal devices and official controls at least once every ten years to ensure its comprehensive plan conforms to metropolitan system plans and ensure its fiscal devices and official controls do not conflict with the comprehensive plan or permit activities that conflict with metropolitan system plans; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes sections 473.858 and 473.864 require local governmental units to complete their “decennial” reviews by December 31, 2018; the City of Edina received a one-year extension from the Metropolitan Council to complete the Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina authorized the review and update of its Comprehensive Plan, including the Comprehensive Sewer Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed City of Edina 2040 Comprehensive Plan is a planning tool intended to guide the future growth and development of the City of Edina in a manner that conforms with metropolitan system plans and complies with the Metropolitan Land Planning Act and other applicable planning statutes; and WHEREAS, the proposed City of Edina 2040 Comprehensive Plan reflects a community planning process conducted in the years 2016 through 2019 involving elected officials, appointed officials, city staff, community organizations, the public at large, developers, and other stakeholders; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 473.858, the proposed 2040 Comprehensive Plan was submitted to adjacent governmental units and affected special districts and school districts for review and comment on May 8, 2019, and the statutory six- month review and comment period has elapsed; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered the proposed 2040 Comprehensive Plan and all public comments, and thereafter submitted its recommendations to the Edina City Council; and RESOLUTION NO. 2020-80 Page 2 WHEREAS, on November 13, 2019 the Planning Commission and December 3, 2019, the Edina City Council conducted public hearings on the proposed 2040 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Edina City Council approved Resolution 2019-108 authorizing the proposed 2040 Comprehensive Plan, including the Comprehensive Sewer Plan, to be submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review; and WHEREAS, at its regular meeting on June 24, 2020, the Metropolitan Council completed its review of the proposed 2040 Comprehensive Plan and the Comprehensive Sewer Plan and found that the Plan meets the requirements of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act; conforms to the metropolitan system plans for transportation (including aviation), water resources, and parks; is consistent with Thrive MSP 2040; and is compatible with the plans of adjacent jurisdictions and affected special districts and school districts; WHEREAS, the 2040 proposed Comprehensive Plan includes all revisions made during the review process and responds to additional advisory comments that are part of the Metropolitan Council’s actions authorizing the Edina City Council to place its proposed 2040 Comprehensive Plan into effect; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council approves the City of Edina’s Comprehensive Sewer Plan. NOW THERE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNIL, that the City of Edina’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, including the Comprehensive Sewer Plan, is adopted and is effective as of the date of this resolution. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, pursuant to sections 473.864 and 473.865 of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act, the City of Edina will: (1) review its fiscal devices and official controls; (2) if necessary, amend its fiscal devices and official controls to ensure they do not conflict with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan or permit activity in conflict with metropolitan system plans; and (3) submit amendments to fiscal devices or official controls to the Metropolitan Council for “information purposes.” Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on August 18, 2020 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-80 Page 3 ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 18, 2020, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2020. _________________________________ City Clerk August 18, 2020 Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Cary Teague, Community Development Director Haila Maze, Bolton and Menk & Bill Smith, Biko Associates – Comprehensive Plan Consultants Edina Comprehensive Plan Action – Required Changes from Met Council Overview The City of Edina’s draft comprehensive plan was approved for submittal to the Metropolitan Council at the Edina City Council meeting on December 3, 2019. As guided by state statute, the Metropolitan Council is charged with reviewing Twin Cities area comprehensive plans for: • Conformance with metropolitan system plans • Consistency with adopted policy plans • Compatibility with plans of affected and adjacent jurisdictions After completion of its initial review, Metropolitan Council issued an incomplete letter on January 22, 2020 (See attached). This is a typical step in the plan review process, which provides an opportunity for the city to submit supplementary materials to ensure the plan meets all completeness review standards. Metropolitan Council staff noted that similar letters have been issued for almost all comprehensive plans reviewed to date, and that there were no issues that raised significant concern. On the city’s side, none of the comments reflect a need for a change in policy or direction to the plan. Primarily, comments are concerned with completeness and clarity of the data provided in support of the plan. Changes Made to Plan The comments and responses are addressed in detail in a matrix and resulted in a series of changes to the draft plan, shown where applicable as redlines. A summary of the changes to the plan follows, organized by plan section: Land Use (Chapter 3) • A higher resolution version of the future land use map was provided. • Additional notes were added to several tables to clarify what was being shown, and what assumptions were used in the calculations. STAFF REPORT Page 2 • Clarifications were added to the neighborhood node density ranges, consistent with what was adopted in applicable small area plans. The Met Council would not allow no cap on density in the 44th and France District; therefore, the range was reduced from 12 acres and up to 12-60. The height restrictions will likely be the main regulator of density in that area. • Maps and tables were updated to clarify how non-buildable areas are addressed, particularly major roadways and rail corridors. • Met Council staff has provided a memorandum explaining how the city’s population projections were arrived at. This memo corrects their explanation in the Committee Report for the Metropolitan Council meeting of June 24, 2020. (See attached memo from the Met Council). City staff made a recommendation to the Met Council regarding population projections; Met Council staff stated that the projections were too low and gave the city the projections that are in the Plan. City staff, along with the Comprehensive Plan consultants agreed with the projections. Housing (Chapter 4) • Plan was updated to reflect previously agreed-upon change in affordable housing that accompanied a previous change in citywide population forecasts. • Housing improvements areas was added as a potential housing tool. Transportation (Chapter 5) • Information was added regarding planned future roadway lane configurations and right-of-way needs, based on existing plans. • Additional and updated details about transit routes serving the city were included. Water (Chapter 7) • Information was added regarding the status of existing agreements with adjacent jurisdictions regarding joint billing arrangements. • Additional capacity and design flow data were provided for the existing trunk sewer system. • More information was added about existing practices and ordinances related to managing inflow and infiltration within the existing sewer system, including information about sources and extent of the issues. • Additional information provided regarding roles and responsibilities related to the management of subsurface treatment systems. • Included material from previous completed water supply plan, and ensured it was updated to correspond with previously agreed-upon population forecast increases which are in the plan. Additionally, some updates were made to the table of contents and appendix organization, as well as chapter cross references, to ensure that they are consistent with the revised materials. Based on these edits and subsequent review, the Metropolitan Council issued a letter on April 21, 2020 (see attached), certifying the plan as complete. The plan was subsequently approved at the Metropolitan Council’s meeting on June 24, 2020, after being reviewed by the Environment Committee on June 9 and the Community Development Committee on June 15. The approval letter is attached. The Metropolitan Council action included several conditions of approval. They are listed below, along with status: STAFF REPORT Page 3 1. Authorize the City of Edina to place its 2040 Comprehensive Plan into effect: this is today’s recommended City Council action. 2. Revise the City’s forecasts upward as shown in Table 1 of the attached Review Record: this change was already incorporated in the plan prior to Metropolitan Council review. 3. Revise the City’s affordable housing need allocation for 2021-2030 to 1,804 units: this change was already incorporated in the plan prior to Metropolitan Council review. 4. Advise the City to implement the advisory comments in the Review Record for Water Supply: the final version of the water supply plan will be provided to the MN DNR, as directed. 5. Approve the City of Edina’s Comprehensive Sewer Plan: this is included in the recommended City Council action. 6. Prior to adoption, the final Plan needs to include a map that clearly identifies the local pipe ID that corresponds to the connection to the regional system: this map is included in the packet. Recommended Action Recommend that the City Council approve the resolution that the Comprehensive Plan, including the Comprehensive Sewer Plan, is adopted and is effective as of the date of the resolution. Memorandum Page - 1 DATE: August 13, 2020 TO: Cary Teague, Community Development Director, City of Edina FROM: Michael Larson, Senior Planner, Sector Representative for Council District 5 SUBJECT: Edina comprehensive plan forecasts I thought it might be helpful for me to offer an overview of how the Metropolitan Council develops and uses forecasts. You are familiar with most of this but thought it might be helpful to share with your public officials. Forecast Overview Forecasts of population, households, and employment are neither goals nor mandates. They represent a likely future. Forecasts are important in planning for both local and regional infrastructure such as transportation, sewers, and water supply. They help ensure that infrastructure investments can be planned and timed in a way that makes efficient use of public dollars. They can help prevent infrastructure that is undersized (as a result of unplanned growth) or oversized (“field of dreams” or unreasonable aspirations for growth). These situations increase costs to the public. Role of Council versus City The Metropolitan Council develops and maintains official population, household, and employment for the region and its communities. It develops them in consultation with communities and are based on a regional economic model. The Council expect cities to use a consistent set of numbers for its planning. Forecasts include figures for 2020, 2030, and 2040. This forecasts should be seen in context of comprehensive planning, which is updated every 10 years using new sets of forecasts. Furthermore, planning for capital investments in infrastructure is typically adjusted each year for a rolling five-year period (a 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan, or CIP). Because the region and cities plan using different time scales, course corrections can be done if pacing is different than what was forecasted. Because forecasts are sometimes different than what we expected, they can be adjusted. Our regional economic model cannot predict situations that might shock the economy, like the Great Recession or the economic impacts of the current pandemic. In these cases, growth might be lower than what we expected. In other cases, forecasts might be adjusted upward when there are additional development opportunities that cities had not expected. The Council does not unilaterally change a City’s official forecasts, and it takes official action by the Council to do so. Rather, the Council works with cities when we think that a forecast adjustment is warranted. We seek agreement among staff of the respective agencies before moving forward with official action. Many comprehensive plan amendments over recent years involve forecast adjustment as a result of new multifamily development projects on land that had not been previously guided for residential uses, or when the City increases the type of density allowed. City of Edina’s Comprehensive Plan In late 2018, Council staff recommended higher forecasts than what the City had initially proposed. Council and City staff discussed what would be reasonable forecasts to use. The Council’s recommendations for an increase were based on an analysis where the Council’s estimates of population, households, and employment in different parts of the Page - 2 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL City for the year 2017 had already increased beyond what was forecasted for the year 2020. These adjustments increased the overall forecasts for the City. The Metropolitan Council’s review report of the Edina Comprehensive Plan includes a section on Forecasts on page 8. It states, “Council staff agree that a forecast change is needed.” Table 1 includes the column headers “Council Forecasts” and “City Proposed Forecasts.” The figures under Council Forecasts were the most recently adjusted official forecasts for the City of Edina. The figures under City Proposed Forecast are the forecasts that the City consistently used in its comprehensive plan, and which the Metropolitan Council revised at its meeting on June 24, 2020. Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: IX.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Heidi Lee, Race & Equity Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Human Rights & Relations Commission Recommendation for Ensuring Equity in City Facility Art & Decor Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the Art and Decor assessment rubric as recommended by the Human Rights & Relations Commission (HRRC) and direct HRRC to conduct and assessment on the Mayor's Conference Room and City Hall Atrium for City Council review. INTRODUCTION: Initiative No. 4 on the HRRC Work Plan states: create an assessment rubric / recommendation process for City facility artwork and décor to ensure it reflects diversity of race and culture. This work plan item is from the Racial Equity Implementation Plan approved by the City Council (R&E 18E). The rubric will be used to gather and provide baseline information and help guide recommendations on next steps for the rubric user. The foundation of the rubric is built on three categories that were presented in the Race & Equity Final Report and Recommendations, in Appendix N under Décor. The initial use and submission of the assessment will provide a process model on how to use the rubric. Staff recommends approval of HRRC's recommendation. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report Art & Decor Assessment Rubric August 18, 2020 Mayor and City Council Heidi Lee, Race & Equity Coordinator, and Staff Liaison to Human Rights & Relations Commission Recommendation for Assessment Rubric/Recommendation Process for City Facility Artwork & Décor to Ensure it Reflects Diversity and Race Information / Background: The City Council approved the charge of creating an assessment rubric process to ensure the City’s facility artwork and décor reflect the diversity and race on November 6, 2019. The charge appears on the HRRC’s 2020 work plan under Initiative No. 4. states: create an assessment rubric / recommendation process for City facility artwork and décor to ensure it reflects diversity of race and culture. The HRRC gathered feedback on the rubric such as assessment categories/themes and how to determine if they are met. The rubric consists of five themes or categories that are components of diversity and inclusion as well guiding questions and considerations to be used when a person is assigning value to each theme: • Representation: Is there a visual representation of diverse groups of people in Edina? • Gender Inclusion: Does the artwork and décor reflect diverse gender identities? • Race/Ethnicity Inclusion: Does the artwork and décor reflect more than one racial/cultural/ethnicity (consider languages and religions, as well)? • Accuracy: Does the artwork and décor accurately depict the culture and history of Edina? Does the artwork and décor share different narratives of BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, People of Color)? • Feeling: Does the facility provide a welcoming sense/feeling of as you enter? Is there a variety of mediums used? After the rubric user will determine a numeral value, 1-4, based on what they are seeing and experiencing and complete observation notes and recommendations for the facility space. With the creation of the assessment rubric, the cross-commission members are aware this rubric can evolve as race and equity work continues to grow. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends City Council approve the Arts & Décor assessment rubric as recommended by HRRC and to direct HRRC to conduct an assessment on the Mayor’s Conference Room and City Hall Atrium using the rubric for City Council review. By approving the assessment rubric, it can be used to gather and provide baseline information and helps guide recommendations on next step for the rubric user. The foundation of the rubric is built on three categories that were presented in the Race & Equity Final Report and Recommendations, in Appendix N under Décor. The approval of HRRC to use the assessment rubric to conduct an assessment the Mayor’s Conference Room and City Hall Atrium for City Council review will provide a process model on how to use the rubric. ASSESSMENT RUBRIC/RECOMMENDATION: ARTWORK & DÉCOR TO REFLECT DIVERSITY AND RACE Category/Theme Considerations 4 3 2 1 Representation: Is there a visual representation of diverse groups of people in Edina? - What does diversity look like? - Who is missing from the representation? - Who or group is overrepresented? There is equal representation of diverse groups of people in Edina. There is some visual representation of diverse groups of people in Edina There is very little visual representation of diverse groups of people in Edina. There is no diversity of people represented in the artwork and décor in this facility. Gender Inclusion: Does the artwork and décor reflect diverse gender identities? - What does gender identity and expression look like? Equal representation of gender identities is reflected in the décor and artwork. Some visual representation of gender identities is reflected in the décor and artwork. Very little visual representation of gender identities is reflected in the décor and artwork. No representation of gender identities is reflected in the décor and artwork. Race/Ethnicity Inclusion: Does the artwork and décor reflect more than one racial/cultural/ethnicity (consider languages and religions, as well)? - Who is missing from the representation? - Who or group is overrepresented? There is equal representation of a variety of racial/ethnic groups reflected in the décor and artwork. There is some visual representation of a variety of racial/ethnic groups reflected in the décor and artwork. There is very little visual representation of a variety of racial/ethnic groups reflected in the décor and artwork. There is no visual representation of a variety of racial/ethnic groups reflected in the décor and artwork. Accuracy: Does the artwork and décor accurately depict the culture and history of Edina? Does the artwork and décor share different narratives of BIPOC? - Does the depiction provide only one narrative? Accurate historical representation is reflected in the décor and artwork. Some historical representation is reflected in the décor and artwork. Very little historical is reflected in the décor and artwork. No historical representation is reflected in the décor and artwork. ASSESSMENT RUBRIC/RECOMMENDATION: ARTWORK & DÉCOR TO REFLECT DIVERSITY AND RACE Category/Theme Considerations 4 3 2 1 Feeling: Does the facility provide a welcoming sense/feeling of as you enter? Is there a variety of mediums used? - What does a welcoming space feel like to you? - Each facility has its own look and feel, consider a wide range of art/decor styles (i.e. traditional to contemporary) and mediums (i.e. photography to illustration). There is equal representation of gender identities reflected in the décor and artwork. There is some visual representation of gender identities reflected in the décor and artwork. There is very little visual representation of gender identities reflected in the décor and artwork. There is no visual representation of gender identities reflected in the décor and artwork. Representation Gender Inclusion Racial/Ethnicity Inclusion Accuracy Feeling Total Observation Notes: Next Steps/Recommendation: Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: IX.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Ordinance No. 2020-10: Zoning Ordinance Amendments Regarding Setbacks in the Greater Southdale Area, Building Material Requirements, Requiring Affordable Housing in Commercial Zoning Districts, Design Experience Guidelines, and Total Garage Stalls Required Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Grant second reading of Ordinance No. 2020-10 Zoning Ordinance Amendments Regarding: Setbacks in the Greater Southdale Area, Building Material Requirements, Requiring Affordable Housing in Commercial Zoning Districts, Design Experience Guidelines, and Total Garage Stalls Required. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Ordinance Amendment: Vote: 6 Ayes and 0 Nays. INTRODUCTION: Over the past several months the Planning Commission has been considering a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to address several items on the P lanning Commission work plan for 2020. The affordable housing ordinance amendment is brought forward to strengthen the City’s position in acquiring affordable housing by requiring affordable housing on property that is zoned for commercial uses but allows multifamily housing as a conditionally permitted use. A summary of the amendment is provided in the staff report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report to Planning Commission, July 22, 2020 Ordinance No. 2020-10 Buy In Comparison July 22, 2020 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Zoning Ordinance Amendments Regarding: Setbacks in the Greater Southdale Area, Building Material Requirements, Requiring Affordable Housing in Commercial Zoning Districts, Design Experience Guidelines, and number of garage stalls required Over the past several months the Planning Commission has been considering Zoning Ordinance Amendment to address several items on the Planning Commission work plan for 2020. The affordable housing ordinance amendment is brought forward to strengthen the City’s position in acquiring affordable housing by requiring affordable housing on property that is zoned for commercial uses but allows multifamily housing as a conditionally permitted use. The Planning Commission is asked to hold a public hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council. Below is a summary of the draft ordinance. Sections 1-10. Setbacks in the Greater Southdale District and Required Building Materials. These sections codify portions of the Design Experience Guidelines for the Greater Southdale District regarding setbacks, first floor regulations and building materials. These changes address some of the key elements of the Guidelines regarding setbacks and building materials. Mic Johnson’s recommendations are included in this draft. Section 11. Affordable Housing Required for Multi-Family Residential Uses in Commercial Zoning Districts. Within the City’s Planned Commercial Zoning Districts (PCD) multi-family residential uses are currently allowed by Conditional Use Permit. The Ordinance amendment would require compliance with the city’s affordable housing policy through the Conditional Use Permit process when considering multifamily housing in commercial districts. As requested by the Planning Commission, staff has provided some background information from other cities in regard to their buy-in fees. (See attached) At the work session, the Commission recommended increasing the buy in number to $125,000 with a yearly escalator established by housing price index plus 1%. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Section 12. Minimum Garage Stall Requirements. Reduces the number of enclosed parking stalls for single and double dwellings and townhouses from two spaces to one. This would reduce the cost of building and to de-emphasize the automobile Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX ORDINANCE NO. 2020-10 AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING SETBACKS IN THE SOUTHDALE AREA, BUILDING MATERIALS, HOUSING IN COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS, AND NUMBER OF GARAGE STALLS FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Sec. 36-525. - Requirements for building coverage, setbacks and height is amended as follows: (PRD & PSR Zoning District) (b) Setbacks. Setbacks shall be measured from the boundary of the tract. The required setbacks shall be increased to equal the building height for those buildings whose height exceeds the minimum setbacks required. The minimum setbacks are as follows: Front Street (in feet) Side Street (in feet) Interior Side Yard (in feet) Rear Yard (in feet) PRD-1 30* 30* 20 25 PRD-2 30* 30* 20 35 PRD-3 35* 35* 20 35 PRD-4, 5 35* 35* 35 35 PSR-3, 4 35* 35* 20 35 Accessory buildings Same as principal building 10 10 * Front and Side Street Setbacks for properties in the Greater Southdale District are subject to Sec. 36-1276 Section 2. Sec. 36-553. - Requirements for building coverage, setbacks and height is amended as follows: (MDD District) • (c) Setbacks. Setbacks shall be measured from the boundary of the tract or from the public street right-of-way. Front Street (in feet) Side Street (in feet) Interior Side Yard (in feet) Rear Yard (in feet) MDD-3 35* 35* 20 35 Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 2 MDD-4 35* 35* 20 35 MDD-5 35* 35* 20 35 MDD-6 35* 35* 20 35 * Front and Side Street Setbacks for properties in the Greater Southdale District are subject to Sec. 36-1276 Section 3. Sec. 36-578. - Requirements for building coverage, setbacks and height is amended to add the following: (POD Zoning District) (4) Front and Side Street Setbacks for properties in the Greater Southdale District are subject to Sec. 36-1276 Section 4. Sec. 36-579. (3) – Special Requirements (POD Zoning District) is amended as follows: (3) Building design and construction. In addition to other restrictions of this section and article III of chapter 10, the use, construction, alteration or enlargement of any building or structure within the Planned Office District shall meet the following standards: a. All exterior wall finishes on any building shall be one or a combination of the following: 1. Face brick; 2. Natural stone; 3. Specially designed precast concrete units, if the surfaces have been integrally treated with an applied decorative material or texture; 4. Factory fabricated and finished metal framed panel construction, if the panel materials are any of those noted in subsections (3)a.1 through 3 of this section; or 5. Glass or prefinished metal (other than unpainted galvanized iron). a. All new front building façades in the district that face the public realm must have seventy five percent (75%) transparency (ability to see inside the building) at the ground level. b. All facades on the first vertical 60 feet of a building (above grade) shall use natural materials (brick, stone) facing the public realm (streets, parks, sidewalks). c. No building façade shall be longer than 200 feet without changing direction by a minimum of 90 degrees. d. Ground level first floors must have a minimum floor to ceiling height of 20 feet. b.e. All subsequent additions, exterior alterations and accessory buildings constructed after the erection of an original building shall be constructed of the same materials Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 3 as the original building and shall be designed in a manner conforming to the original architectural design and general appearance. Section 5. Sec. 36-617 (b) – Requirements for building coverage, setbacks and height in the PCD Zoning Districts is amended as follows: Sec. 36-617 (b). - Requirements for building coverage, setbacks and height. (b) Setbacks. Subject to the requirements of section 36-618 (1) and (2). Front Street (in feet) Side Street (in feet) Side Yard (in feet) Rear Yard (in feet) PCD-1 35* 25* 25* 25* PCD-2 35* 25* 25* 25* PCD-3 North of 70th St. 35** ** 35** 35 35 PDC-3 South of 70th St. 50** ** 50** 50 50 PCD-4 Gas stations 35 25 25 25 All other uses 45 25 45 25 *Subject to the requirements of section 36-618. ** Subject to the requirements of section 36-1276 Section 6. Subsection 36-618, Special requirements in the PCD Zoning Districts is amended as follows: Sec. 36-618. - Special requirements. (3) Setbacks for PCD-3 subdistrict. The minimum building setback required by section 36-617(b) shall be increased as follows: a. In the area bounded by France Avenue on the west, York Avenue on the east and W. 70th Street on the south, the minimum building setback shall be increased by one-third-foot for each foot that the building exceeds 50 feet in building height. For purposes hereof, only those portions of buildings which exceeds 50 feet in building height need provide the additional setbacks required by this subsection. b. In all other areas, the minimum building setback shall be equal to the building height for buildings taller than 50 feet. (11) Building design and construction. In addition to the other restrictions of this section and article III of chapter 10, the use, construction, alteration or enlargement of any building or structure within the Planned Commercial District shall meet the following standards: a. All exterior wall finishes on any building shall be one or a combination of the following: Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 4 1. Face brick; 2. Natural stone; 3. Specially designed precast concrete units, if the surfaces have been integrally treated with an applied decorative material or texture; 4. Factory fabricated and finished metal framed panel construction, if the panel materials are any of those noted in subsections (11)a.1 through 3 of this section; or 5. Glass or prefinished metal (other than unpainted galvanized iron). a. All new front building façades in the district that face the public realm must have seventy five percent (75%) transparency (ability to see inside the building) at the ground level. b. All facades on the first vertical 60 feet of a building (above grade) shall use natural materials (brick, stone) facing the public realm (streets, parks, sidewalks). c. No building façade shall be longer than 200 feet without changing direction by a minimum of 90 degrees. d. First floors must have a minimum ceiling height of 20 feet. e. Exceptions may be made to a-d above for an affordable housing project that has over 50% of the units considered to affordable housing as defined in Section 36-612 (1). b.f. All subsequent additions, exterior alterations and accessory buildings constructed after the erection of an original building shall be constructed of the same materials as the original building and shall be designed in a manner conforming to the original architectural design and general appearance. Section 7. Subsection 36-643, Requirements for building coverage, setbacks and height in the PID Zoning District is amended to add the following: (g) Front and Side Street Setbacks for properties in the Greater Southdale District are subject to Sec. 36-1276 Section 8. Subsection 36-644, Special requirements in the PID Zoning District is amended as follows: Sec. 36-644. - Special requirements. (11) Building design and construction. In addition to the other restrictions of this section and article III of chapter 10, the use, construction, alteration or enlargement of any building or structure within the Planned Industrial District shall meet the following standards: a. All exterior wall finishes on any building shall be one or a combination of the following: Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 5 1. Face brick; 2. Natural stone; 3. Specially designed precast concrete units, if the surfaces have been integrally treated with an applied decorative material or texture; 4. Factory fabricated and finished metal framed panel construction, if the panel materials are any of those noted in subsections (4)a.1 through 3 of this section; or 5. Glass or prefinished metal (other than unpainted galvanized iron). a. All new front building façades in the district that face the public realm must have seventy five percent (75%) transparency (ability to see inside the building) at the ground level. b. All facades on the first vertical 60 feet of a building (above grade) shall use natural materials (brick, stone) facing the public realm (streets, parks, sidewalks). c. No building façade shall be longer than 200 feet without changing direction by a minimum of 90 degrees. d. First floors must have a minimum ceiling height of 20 feet. b.e. All subsequent additions, exterior alterations and accessory buildings constructed after the erection of an original building shall be constructed of the same materials as the original building and shall be designed in a manner conforming to the original architectural design and general appearance. Section 9. Sec. 36-664. - Requirements for building coverage, setbacks and height is amended as follows: (RMD Zoning District) (b) Setbacks. Front Street Side Street Interior Side Yard Rear Yard 35 feet** 35 feet** 20 feet* 20 feet* *Or the building height, if greater. **Front and Side Street Setbacks for properties in the Greater Southdale District are subject to Sec. 36-1276 Section 10. DIVISION 2. - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO ALL DISTRICTS EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE STATED is amended to add the following: Sec. 36-1276. – Setbacks in the Greater Southdale District (1) Front Street Setbacks on France Avenue between Highway 62 and Minnesota Drive and the on York Avenue between 66th Street and 78th Street: A 50-foot setback is required Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 6 from the face of the curb to the face of building. Above a building height of 60-feet the additional height must step back 10 feet from the face of the building. (2) Front Street Setbacks on streets other than France Avenue and York Avenue: A 30-foot setback is required from the face of curb to the face of building with a building podium height of 60 feet. Above the 60-foot height limit, additional height should step back 30 feet from the face of the building, to a maximum height of 105 feet. Any height about 105 feet should step back and additional 10 feet from the face of the building. (3) All new front building façades in the district that face the public realm must have seventy five percent (75%) transparency (ability to see inside the building) at the ground level. Section 11. Sec. 36-612. - Conditional uses. (PCD Zoning Districts) is amended as follows: The following are the conditional uses permitted in the PCD-1 subdistrict: (1) PCD-1 and PCD-2 subdistricts. Multi-residential uses subject to following: Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 7 a. New rental multi-family developments containing 20-units or more shall provide a minimum of 10% residential units at 50% area median income (AMI) or 20% residential units at 60% AMI. b. New for-sale developments shall provide a minimum of 10% of residential units at AMI. c. Rental and for-sale/owner occupied affordable units shall provide the following: i. on-site parking (either surface or enclosed) for affordable units and the cost related to parking must be included affordable sales price or affordable rental rate. At least one enclosed parking space shall be included in the purchase price of a for-sale unit in the same manner offered to buyers of market rate units. ii. Affordable and market rate residents will have equal access to all entries, lobbies, elevators, parking and amenities. Examples of amenities include storage lockers, balconies, roof decks, outdoor patios, pools, fitness facilities, and similar unit and project features. iii. Exterior appearance of affordable units shall be visually comparable with market rate units in the development. d. New rental housing will remain affordable for a minimum of 20 years and this requirement will be memorialized by a Land Use Restrictive Covenant. e. New for-sale or owner-occupied developments will remain affordable for a minimum of 30 years and this requirement will be memorialized by a Land Use Restrictive Covenant. The Land Use Restrictive Covenant will contain a provision providing the Housing and Redevelopment Authority or Edina Housing Foundation the right of first refusal to purchase affordable units. f. The owners of multi-family rental housing projects subject to this Policy by receiving financial assistance shall accept tenant-based rental housing assistance including but not limited to Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers, HOME tenant- based assistance and Housing Support. Tenants with rental assistance may occupy an affordable dwelling unit with the rent charged not exceeding the maximum allowed by Metro HRA or the assistance provider. Furthermore, the rent charged may not exceed the maximum allowed by the most restrictive funding soured. This requirement will be enforced through a contract between the City of the project owner pursuant to which the owner will be required to adopt business practices that promote fair housing and provide documentation of compliance with these requirements to the City. This requirement will be further enforced through the City’s monitoring policies and procedures. g. Owners of City-assisted housing projects shall affirmatively market affordable housing opportunities. All multi-family housing providers subject to this policy must submit an Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan (AFHMP) at lease every 5 years and a Survey and Certification regarding AFHMP outcomes annually. Owners must advertise housing opportunities on HousingLink or another medium acceptable to the City concurrent with any other public or private advertising. h. Recognizing that affordable housing is created through a partnership between the City and developers, the City and/or Housing and Redevelopment Authority will consider the following incentives for developments that provide affordable housing: Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 8 i. Density bonuses ii. Parking requirement reductions iii. Tax increment financing for projects that exceed the minimum requirement iv. Deferred low interest loans from the Housing and Redevelopment Authority and/or Edina Housing Foundation v. Property Tax Abatement i. In lieu of providing affordable housing in each new qualifying development, the City may consider the following: i. Dedication of existing units in Edina to 110% of what would have been provided in a proposed new development. These units would need to be of an equivalent quality within the determination of the City. ii. Financial risk and participation in the construction of affordable dwelling units of an equivalent quality by another developer on a different site within the City. iii. An alternative proposed by a developer that directly or indirectly provides or enables provision of an equivalent amount of affordable housing within the city. An alternative could be payment of a Total Buy In (TBI) fee, a cash payment to the City in lieu of providing affordable housing units. The TBI shall be equal to $125,000 per unit rounding up to the next whole unit, plus a yearly escalator established by the housing price index plus one percent (1%). The TBI would be due in cash or certified funds in full to the City at the time of issuance of the building permit. A building permit will not be issued unless the TBI is paid in full. The City Council may allow the housing developer to pre-pay the TBI to satisfy a future Affordable Housing Opportunity on a case-by-case basis. TBI will be deposited into the Affordable Housing Trust Fund to be used for the development and preservation of affordable housing. (2) PCD-3 subdistrict. a. Automobile agencies selling new, unused vehicles. b. Boat or marine stores or agencies selling or displaying new, unused boats. c. Multi-residential uses subject to following: iv. New rental multi-family developments containing 20 units or more shall provide a minimum of 10% residential units at 50% area median income (AMI) or 20% residential units at 60% AMI. v. New for-sale developments shall provide a minimum of 10% of residential units at AMI. vi. Rental and for-sale/owner occupied affordable units shall provide the following: (1) on-site parking (either surface or enclosed) for affordable units and the cost related to parking must be included affordable sales price or affordable rental rate. At least one enclosed parking space shall be included in the purchase price of a for-sale unit in the same manner offered to buyers of market rate units. (2) Affordable and market rate residents will have equal access to all entries, lobbies, elevators, parking and amenities. Examples of amenities include Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 9 storage lockers, balconies, roof decks, outdoor patios, pools, fitness facilities, and similar unit and project features. (3) Exterior appearance of affordable units shall be visually comparable with market rate units in the development. vii. New rental housing will remain affordable for a minimum of 20 years and this requirement will be memorialized by a Land Use Restrictive Covenant. viii. New for-sale or owner-occupied developments will remain affordable for a minimum of 30 years and this requirement will be memorialized by a Land Use Restrictive Covenant. The Land Use Restrictive Covenant will contain a provision providing the Housing and Redevelopment Authority or Edina Housing Foundation the right of first refusal to purchase affordable units. ix. The owners of multi-family rental housing projects subject to this Policy by receiving financial assistance shall accept tenant-based rental housing assistance including but not limited to Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers, HOME tenant- based assistance and Housing Support. Tenants with rental assistance may occupy an affordable dwelling unit with the rent charged not exceeding the maximum allowed by Metro HRA or the assistance provider. Furthermore, the rent charged may not exceed the maximum allowed by the most restrictive funding soured. This requirement will be enforced through a contract between the City of the project owner pursuant to which the owner will be required to adopt business practices that promote fair housing and provide documentation of compliance with these requirements to the City. This requirement will be further enforced through the City’s monitoring policies and procedures. x. Owners of City-assisted housing projects shall affirmatively market affordable housing opportunities. All multi-family housing providers subject to this policy must submit an Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan (AFHMP) at lease every 5 years and a Survey and Certification regarding AFHMP outcomes annually. Owners must advertise housing opportunities on HousingLink or another medium acceptable to the City concurrent with any other public or private advertising. xi. Recognizing that affordable housing is created through a partnership between the City and developers, the City and/or Housing and Redevelopment Authority will consider the following incentives for developments that provide affordable housing: (1) Density bonuses (2) Parking requirement reductions (3) Tax increment financing for projects that exceed the minimum requirement (4) Deferred low interest loans from the Housing and Redevelopment Authority and/or Edina Housing Foundation (5) Property Tax Abatement xii. In lieu of providing affordable housing in each new qualifying development, the City may consider the following: (1) Dedication of existing units in Edina to 110% of what would have been provided in a proposed new development. These units would need to be of an equivalent quality within the determination of the City. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 10 (2) Financial risk and participation in the construction of affordable dwelling units of an equivalent quality by another developer on a different site within the City. (3) An alternative proposed by a developer that directly or indirectly provides or enables provision of an equivalent amount of affordable housing within the city. An alternative could be payment of a Total Buy In (TBI) fee, a cash payment to the City in lieu of providing affordable housing units. The TBI shall be equal to $125,000 per unit rounding up to the next whole unit, plus a yearly escalator established by the housing price index plus one percent (1%). (4) The TBI would be due in cash or certified funds in full to the City at the time of issuance of the building permit. A building permit will not be issued unless the TBI is paid in full. The City Council may allow the housing developer to pre-pay the TBI to satisfy a future Affordable Housing Opportunity on a case-by-case basis. TBI will be deposited into the Affordable Housing Trust Fund to be used for the development and preservation of affordable housing. d. Offices, except offices allowed as a permitted accessory use. e. All nonresidential uses that increase the FAR to more than 0.5. Subdivision II. - Parking Spaces Section 12. Sec. 36-1311. Minimum number required is hereby amended as follows: (a) Single dwelling units, double dwelling units and residential townhouses. Two fully enclosed spaces per dwelling unit. One fully enclosed space per dwelling unit for single, double dwelling units and residential townhouses. Section 13. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage. First Reading: August 5, 2020 Second Reading: Published: Attest Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor City Unit Requirements Buy-In Option Duration Highland Park, IL 20%; 1/3 of affordable units @50% AMI; 1/3 for 51%-80% of AMI; 1/3 81% to 120% AMI $125,000/unit 25 years Bloomington, MN 9% @ 60% AMI $9.60/SF Leasable space 20 years Golden Valley 15% @ 60% AMI or 10% at 50% AMI 20 years Minnetonka If no $ but zoning: 5% @50% AMI; If $: 20% @ 50% AMI or 40% @ 60% AMI 30 years Richfield 20% @60% AMI 15% of Net present value of tax increment generated. St. Louis Park 20% @ 60% AMI; 10% @ 50% AMI; 5% @ 30% AMI 25 years Boulder, CO 25% regardless of size or unit count based on average size of units, ranging between $48,474/unit (<349 SF) to $193,894/unit (>1200 SF). Even single family building own home is required to pay in in addition to other requirements ($249,319 for home >1,200 SF). Permanent Somerville, MA 6 or 7 units = 1 affordable; 8-17 units = 17.5% affordable. 18+ units = 20% affordable For rental units: (A x B x C) where: A equals the number of affordable units not constructed, in lieu of a cash payment and/or donation of land/buildings. “B” equals current low HOME rent for the average bedroom size in the project/market rate rent charged for the average bedroom size in the project. “C” equals Net Operating Income/Capitalization Rate = Market Value of the Property/total number of bedrooms in the project = per bedroom price x average bedroom size Seattle, WA Vary based on location, with higher requirements in areas with higher housing costs. 5% to 11% of units are required to be affordable. $5.00 to $32.75 per SF Pasedena, CA 15%based on fee schedule, 1-49 units= $1.23 to $27.26 per livable sq. ft of total units. For 50+ units+ $1.23 to $37.47 per livable sq ft of total units. Boston, MA If zoning change or $ requested and 10+ units: 13% affordable $200K in lower cost zones (x 15%); $300K middle cost zones (x18%); $380K higher cost zones (x18% units being developed)in perpituity Burlington, VT 15-25% (depending on average price of MR homes)Not allowed 99 years Evanston, IL 10% of total units in a dvelopment, 20% if the development recieves public funding $175K for units in all downtown and research park zoning districts, 150K per affordable dwelling unit in all other zoning districts Portland,ME All projects including ten (10) or more residential units will be required to provide 10% of the total number of units as Workforce housing The fee for Workforce Units not provided shall be $100,000 per unit, adjusted annually Redmond,WA At least 10% of the total number of homes in all new developments of 10 or more homes or dwellings must be affordable Lake Forest, IL 15% of total units 130K per unit Chapel Hill, NC 10% of units in any devlopment with five or more units that is located in the Town Center 85K per unit Grounded Solutions Example 1: 4500 France, 45 units, Residential 65,673 SF Edina 500,000$ Bloomington 630,461$ Highland Park 625,000$ Boulder 2,181,308$ Seattle 2,150,791$ Boston 3,078,000$ "Buy In" Comparisons -The higher the fee, the higher the chance developers will build on-site. - Some cities determine the in-lieu fee levels based on a consultant report that estimates for the market prices and rents for the kinds of units that are typically being produced by local developers. Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: IX.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve Summary Publication for Ordinance No. 2020-10 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve summary publication for Ordinance No. 2020-10 Ordinance Amendments Regarding Setbacks in the Greater Southdale Area, Building Material Requirements, Requiring Affordable Housing in Commercial Zoning Districts, Design Experience Guidelines, and Total Garage Stalls Required. INTRODUCTION: State Statute requires that the City publish all approved ordinances within 45 days of approval in its official newspaper. State Statute allows cities to choose to publish a summary of a complete public notice. This is a cost effective option for lengthy ordinances. To comply with State Statue, summary publications must be approved by four-fifths majority of the Council. Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: IX.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2020-81: Site Plan Review for 3451 Parklawn Avenue for York Gardens Senior Living Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2020-81 approving the Site Plan for 3451 Parklawn Avenue for York Gardens Senior Living. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the request. Vote: 6 Ayes and 0 Nays. INTRODUCTION: In 2009, the City Council approved a Rezoning on this site to construct a 76-unit, 4-story addition to the northwest side of the existing 337-unit, 9-story senior housing development at 7500 York Avenue. The applicant, York Gardens Senior Living, is now requesting site plan approval to convert existing therapy and office space into three apartments in the 76-unit building. There would be no increase in staffing to accommodate the new apartments. Additional parking would not be needed, but the applicant has provided a proof of parking plan to show that parking could be accommodated on site if needed. T here would be no exterior modifications to the building or site. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report to Planning Commission, July 22, 2020 Resolution No. 2020-81 Applicant Submittal Site Location Overall Site Plan Proof of Parking Plan Aerial July 22, 2020 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Site Plan Review 3451 Parklawn Avenue for York Gardens Senior Living Information / Background: In 2009, the City Council approved a Rezoning on this site to construct a 76-unit, 4-story addition to the northwest side of the existing 337-unit, 9-story senior housing development at 7500 York Avenue. The applicant, York Gardens Senior Living, is now requesting site plan approval to convert existing therapy and office space into three apartments in the 76-unit building. There would be no increase in staffing to accommodate the new apartments. Additional parking would not be needed, but the applicant has provided a proof of parking plan to show that parking could be accommodated on site if needed. There would be no exterior modifications to the building or site. (See attached applicant narrative and plans.) The following is required for this request: Site plan modification review for three additional units. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: CommonBond Multi-family residential; zoned PSR-4 and guided for greater Southdale district residential. Easterly: Yorkdale townhomes; zoned PRD-3 and guided high density housing. Southerly: Edinborough condos; zoned MDD-5 and guided greater Southdale district residential. Westerly: Multi-family residential; zoned MDD-6 and guided greater Southdale district residential. Existing Site Features The existing site features will remain the same. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Planning Guide Plan designation: Greater Southdale District Residential. Zoning: PSR-4, Planned Senior Residential – 4 Density The site is 2.72 acres in size. The addition of three units in the 76-unit building would result in a density of 29 units per acre. The maximum density allowed for the project is 44 units per acre. The proposed density of 29 units per acre would meet the city’s code requirement for density in the PSR-4, Planned Senior Housing District. The Comprehensive Plan would allow a density of up to 100 units per acre. Parking The site currently shares parking with the co-op to the south. For both buildings, there is an excess of parking stalls. With the added units a total of 320 parking stalls are required for senior housing, 103 of which must be enclosed. The sites contain 465 parking stalls, 252 of which are enclosed. The applicant has provided a proof of parking plan should they wish to add spaces closer to the building. Grading/Drainage/Utilities There will be no change to grading and drainage. Site Access There will be no change in access to the site. Landscaping There will be no change in landscaping on site. Building Design There will be no alteration to the exterior building design. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the site plan modification. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal would continue to meet the required standards and ordinances for Site Plan approval. STAFF REPORT Page 3 2. The additional unit will not alter the site or existing building elevations, will not alter traffic patterns or increase traffic and will conform to the parking requirements of the zoning ordinance. Approval of the site plan modification is subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped June 10, 2019. 2. Building plans are subject to review and approval of the Building Inspections Plans examiner and Fire Marshal at the time of building permit. Deadline for a city decision: September 15, 2020 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-81 RESOLUTION APPROVING SITE PLAN AT 3451 PARKLAWN AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 In 2009, the City Council approved a Rezoning on this site to construct a 76-unit, 4-story addition to the northwest side of the existing 337-unit, 9-story senior housing development at 7500 York Avenue. The applicant, York Gardens Senior Living, is now requesting site plan approval to convert existing therapy and office space into three apartments in the 76-unit building. There would be no increase in staffing to accommodate the new apartments. Additional parking would not be needed, but the applicant has provided a proof of parking plan to show that parking could be accommodated on site if needed. There would be no exterior modifications to the building or site. 1.02 The request requires the following: 1. A Site Plan Review. 1.03 The property is legally described as follows: Lot 2 Block 1, Seventy Five Hundred York Campus 1.04 On July 22, 2020 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the proposal. Vote: 6 Ayes, 0 Nays. 1.05 On August 5, 2020, the City Council held a public hearing and considered the request. Section 2. FINDINGS & APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Site Plan to remodel the existing therapy and office space into three apartments in the 76-unit building. At 3451 Parklawn Avenue. 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal would continue to meet the required standards and ordinances for Site Plan approval. 2. The additional unit will not alter the site or existing building elevations, will not alter traffic patterns or increase traffic and will conform to the parking requirements of the zoning ordinance. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-81 Page 2 2.02 Approval is conditioned upon the following: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped June 10, 2019. 2. Building plans are subject to review and approval of the Building Inspections Plans examiner and Fire Marshal at the time of building permit. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on August 18, 2020. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 18, 2020, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2020. _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk July 1, 2020 Dear Council Members, Due to the growing and changing internal and external market, York Gardens has identified a need for more Enhanced Care apartments. Enhanced Care is a higher level of Assisted Living care, where residents need more ongoing assistance due to a higher acuity level. As a result, York Gardens would like to restructure and enrich our Enhanced Care Community. When York Gardens was built, the assumption was made that 7500 York residents would use the therapy space as well as our own residents. Unfortunately, both 7500 York and York Gardens residents receive therapy services in their apartment leaving the space unused. Our objective is to transition our fourth floor into a specialized Enhanced Care Community. We will remodel the unused therapy space, 3 unused offices and a small common space. This will result in the addition of three (3) apartments. We will not need to increase our staffing but the restructuring of fourth floor will allow us to create a specialized Enhanced Care Community with services and activities shaped around higher acuity needs. Approximately 20% of our York Gardens residents have a spouse residing in 7500 York and are able to walk over for visits. No additional parking will be needed so parking requirements will be accomplished through proof of parking. If you have additional questions, please contact me at 612-874-4006 or jbarney1@fairview.org. We appreciate your consideration of this matter. Regards, Jody Barney Regional Assisted Living Director Ebenezer G001 TITLE SHEET THE DESIGNS AND PLANS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGSARE THE PROPERTY OF AYRES ASSOCIATES. ALL RIGHTSARE RESERVED. NO DESIGNS OR PLANS SHALL BE USED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY FORM OR BY ANY MEANS WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF AYRES ASSOCIATES.ASSOCIATES17 OCTOBER 2019 PROJECT NO. 08-1899.00 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM DULY REGISTERED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NUMBER: WISCONSIN.MINNESOTA. MARK DATE DESCRIPTION Eau Claire Office3433 Oakwood Hills ParkwayEau Claire, Wisconsin 54702(715) 834-3161River Falls Office215 N. Second Street Suite 204River Falls, Wisconsin 54022(715) 426-4908Fax: (715) 426-5866EDINA, MNYORK GARDENS SENIOR LIVINGCOMMON AREA RENOVATIONCB NO. 12/13/20201 PROJECT DIRECTORY: DRAWING INDEX DESIGN/ BUILD MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL G001 TITLE SHEET ARCHITECTURAL A101 EXISTING THIRD AND FOURTH FLOOR PLANS AND ACCESSIBILITY DETAILS A102 FOURTH FLOOR DEMO PLAN, FOURTH FLOOR PLAN AND WALL TYPES A103 FOURTH FLOOR DEMO CEILING PLAN, FOURTH FLOOR REFLECTED CEILING PLAN A104 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS, DOOR TYPES, FRAME TYPES AND DOOR SCHEDULE F101 FOURTH FLOOR FINISH PLAN AND SCHEDULE PROJECT LOCATION MAP GENERAL NOTES 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ACCEPT THE PROJECT SITE AS IT EXISTS. ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS WHETHER OR NOT SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT PROCEED WITH ANY ITEM(S) OF WORK WHICH IS REASONABLY QUESTIONABLE WITHOUT CONSULTING THE OWNER OR ARCHITECT. 2.ALL WORK, PROCEDURES, AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS AND CODES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS REQUIRED. 3.ALL CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULING AND SEQUENCING SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE OWNER PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL TRASH REMOVAL AT INTERVALS SUCH THAT EXCESSIVE AMOUNTS OF TRASH AND DEBRIS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO ACCUMULATE IN THE WORK AREAS OR ON THE SITE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH CONTAINERS FOR PROPER STORAGE AND REMOVAL OF TRASH. 5.SECURITY: GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROJECT SECURITY. 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE WORK SO AS TO MAINTAIN SOLE RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES AND SEQUENCES. 7.PROVIDE SMOKE DETECTION AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM AS REQUIRED BY CODE. 8.THE FIRE PROTECTION SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN, SUPPLY AND INSTALL THE AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM TO ACCOMMODATE THE WORK AND AS REQUIRED BY CURRENT CODES & STANDARDS. 9.GENERAL CONTRACTOR COORDINATE WITH ALL SUBCONTRACTORS ALL REQUIRED OPENINGS, NOT INDICATED HEREIN. 10.ALL PARTIES SHALL UNDERSTAND THAT CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE A COMPLETE SET OF INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO CONSTRUCT A BUILDING. CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES, PROCEDURES, AND SITE SAFETY PRECAUTIONS ARE CUSTOMARILY ASSIGNED AS RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CONTRACTOR TO GIVE THE CONTRACTOR FULL LATITUDE IN PREPARING BIDS AND CARRYING OUT THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE. THE CONTRACTOR DETERMINES THE ASSIGNMENT OF WORK TO SPECIFIC TRADES AND SUBCONTRACTORS. THE CONTRACTOR ALSO MANAGES LOGISTICAL MATTERS SUCH AS SEQUENCE OF OPERATIONS, SCHEDULING, DESIGN OF TEMPORARY SUPPORTS AND FACILITIES, SELECTION OF APPROPRIATE EQUIPMENT, AND PROJECT SAFETY. PROJECT SITE BUILDING OWNER: Ebenezer Senior Living 3451 Parklawn Ave. Edina, MN 55435 Phone: 952-898-6700 Contact : Kelsey Buss Email: kbuss@yorkgardens.org ARCHITECT: Ayres Associates 215 N. 2nd Street, Suite 204 River Falls, WI 54022 Phone: (715) 831-7552 Contact : Mark Paschke Email: paschkem@ayresassociates.com 1.THE DESIGN / BUILD ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE ILLUMINATION LEVELS AND EMERGENCY / EXIT LIGHTING AS REQUIRED PER CODE. LIGHT FIXTURE LAYOUTS SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. 2.THE HVAC SYSTEM INCLUDING DIFFUSER LAYOUT WILL BE DESIGN / BUILD BY THE SELECTED MECHANICAL SUBCONTRACTOR(S). 3.THE HVAC SUBCONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR BALANCING AND ENSURING AN EFFICIENT SYSTEM. 4.COORDINATE WITH ALL DESIGN / BUILD SUBCONTRACTORS ALL REQUIRED OPENINGS, NOT INDICATED HEREIN. CONTRACTOR: Prime General Contractors 1710 Alexander Rd. Eagan, MN 55121 Phone: 952-746-3636 Contact : Derek Clarkin Email: dclarkin@primegc.com UPDWW/D317EXIST.UNIT319EXIST.UNIT321EXIST.UNIT323EXIST.UNIT376EXIST.STAIR338EXIST.CORRIDOR318EXIST.UNIT316EXIST.UNIT320EXIST.UNIT322EXIST.UNIT324EXIST.UNITUPAREA OF WORKAREA OF WORKAREA OF WORKNO WORK THISAREANO WORK THISAREA432EXIST.THERAPY436EXIST.CONFERENCE436EXIST.KITCHEN433EXIST.STORAGE434EXIST.BATH437EXIST.OFFICE438EXIST.MECH.431EXIST.WORK439EXIST.TOILET440EXIST.TOILET441EXIST.MECH.442AEXIST.STORAGE442EXIST.ACTIVITY428EXIST.CORRIDOR443LIBRARY/INTERNET430ELEV.LOBBY445STAGING448KITCHEN476STAIR C443AMECH.NO WORK THISAREANO WORK THISAREA414KITCHEN412UNITA101THE DESIGNS AND PLANS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGSARE THE PROPERTY OF AYRES ASSOCIATES. ALL RIGHTSARE RESERVED. NO DESIGNS OR PLANS SHALL BEUSED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY FORM OR BY ANY MEANSWITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF AYRES ASSOCIATES.ASSOCIATES17 OCTOBER 2019PROJECT NO. 08-1899.00I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THISPLAN SPECIFICATION OR REPORTWAS PREPARED BY ME ORUNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONAND THAT I AM DULYREGISTERED ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OFNUMBER:WISCONSIN.MINNESOTA.MARKDATEDESCRIPTIONEau Claire Office 3433 Oakwood Hills Parkway Eau Claire, Wisconsin 54702 (715) 834-3161 River Falls Office 215 N. Second Street Suite 204 River Falls, Wisconsin 54022 (715) 426-4908 Fax: (715) 426-5866 EDINA, MN YORK GARDENS SENIOR LIVING COMMON AREA RENOVATION CB NO. 12/13/20201EXISTING FOURTH FLOOR PLAN (FOR REFERENCE ONLY)S C A L E : 1/8" = 1'-0"2A101PLAN NORTHEXISTING DOOR TOREMAINNEW OR RELOCATEDDOORDRAWING KEYEXISTING WALLTO REMAINNEW WALLGENERAL NOTES:- COORDINATE WITH THE DESIGN / BUILD MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL,FIRE PROTECTION & PLUMBING SUBCONTRACTORS FOR ALLREQUIRED OPENINGS, NOT INDICATED HEREIN.EXISTING THIRD FLOOR PLAN (FOR REFERENCE ONLY)S C A L E : 1/8" = 1'-0"1A101PLAN NORTH3048304825 MAX483048(b) FORWARD APPROACH48 0-2020-2515 MIN 17-1927 MIN 9 MIN 36 MAX6 MAX17-1930 MIN24 MAXCLEAR FLOOR SPACEWATER COOLERS48 MINSPOUT HEIGHT AND TO ALLOW A PERSON WITH DIFFICULTY BENDING OVER COOLER A PAPER CUP DIPENSER SHALL ALSO BE PROVIDED NOTE: IN ADDITION TO A WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE WATER EQUIPMENT PERMITTED IN SHADED AREA8 MIN302444 4846 34 MAX 3030(a) PARALLEL APPROACH48 40 MAX 9 MIN6 MAX8 MINDEPTH17 MINTOE CLEARANCE27 MIN 29 MIN 34 MAX 633-36 19 MIN 17-19 36 MINREAR WALLWATER CLOSETS17 MINKNEE CLEARANCE19 MAX48 MINCLEARSPACE30 MIN FLOORCLEAR FLOOR SPACE AT LAVATORIESLAVATORIESLAVATORY CLEARANCESKNEE CLEARANCEREACH DIMENSIONS OVER AN OBSTRUCTION.MINIMUM CLEAR FLOOR SPACE FOR WHEELCHAIRS.NOTE: CLEAR KNEE SPACE SHOULD BE AS DEEP AS THE REACH DISTANCE(c) SIDE REACH LIMIT OVER AN OBSTRUCTION(b) MAXIMUM FORWARD REACH(a) FORWARD REACH LIMIT- THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL FOR BARRIER-FREE ENVIRONMENTS SHALL IDENTIFY ALL ACCESSIBLEENTRANCES, TOILET FACILITIES, DRINKING FOUNTAINS AND PARKING SPACES.- ALL SURFACES ALONG ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHALL BE STABLE, FIRM AND SLIP-RESISTANT.- CONTROLS AND OPERATING MECHANISMS- CLEAR FLOOR SPACE THAT ALLOWS A FORWARD OR A PARALLEL APPROACH BY A PERSONUSING A WHEELCHAIR SHALL BE PROVIDED AT CONTROLS, DISPENSERS, RECEPTACLES, ANDOTHER OPERABLE EQUIPMENT.- THE HIGHEST OPERABLE PART OF CONTROLS, DISPENSERS, RECEPTACLES AND OTHER OPERABLE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN AT LEAST ONE OF THE REACH RANGES SHOWN. ELECTRICAL AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM RECEPTACLES ON WALLS SHALL BE MOUNTED NO LESS THAN 15" ABOVE THE FLOOR.- CONTROLS AND OPERATING MECHANISMS SHALL BE OPERABLE WITH ONE HAND AND SHALLNOT REQUIRE TIGHT GRASPING, PINCHING OR TWISTING OF THE WRIST. THE FORCE REQUIREDTO ACTIVATE CONTROLS SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN 5 LB.ACCESSIBILITY NOTES48 MAX. 40" MAX.IIHSGUNERIRFTXE E40" MAX.PAPER TOWELDISP.SOAPDISP.STANDARD FIRE EXTINGUISHERMOUNTING HEIGHTRESTROOM ACCESSORIESACCESSIBLE MOUNTING HEIGHT ACCESS TO DRINKING WATER.N O S C A L E ACCESSIBILITY DETAILS42 MINT.P. HOLDER18 MIN 17-19 12 MAX33-36 SIDE WALL39 - 411839 - 41 12" MIN48" MINCLEARSPACEFLOORFRONT APPROACH, PUSH SIDEDOORS18" MIN60" MINCLEARSPACEFLOORFRONT APPROACH, PULL SIDECLEARSPACEFLOORROLL-IN TYPE SHOWER STALLROLL-IN TYPE SHOWER STALLSIDE WALLCONTROL WALL36 MIN 48 MIN36 60SIDE WALL SEAT WALL CONTROL WALL27 MAX.18 33-36 38 MIN CONTROL AREA18 48 MAX 4 MAX1 1/2 MIN24 MIN42 MAX- DOOR HARDWARE - HANDLES, PULLS, LATCHES, LOCKS AND OTHER OPERATING DEVICES ONACCESSIBLE DOORS SHALL HAVE A SHAPE THAT IS EASY TO GRASP WITH ONE HAND AND DOES NOTREQUIRE TIGHT GRASPING, TIGHT PINCHING, OR TWISTING OF THE WRIST TO OPERATE.LEVER-OPERATED MECHANISMS, PUSH-TYPE MECHANISMS, AND U-SHAPED HANDLES AREACCEPTABLE DESIGNS. WHEN SLIDING DOORS ARE FULLY OPEN, OPERATING HARDWARE SHALL BEEXPOSED AND USABLE FROM BOTH SIDES. HARDWARE REQUIRED FOR ACCESSIBLE DOOR PASSAGESHALL BE MOUNTED NO HIGHER THAN 48" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR.- DOOR CLOSERS - IF A DOOR HAS A CLOSER, THEN THE SWEEP PERIOD OF THE CLOSER SHALL BEADJUSTED SO THAT FROM AN OPEN POSITION OF 70 DEGREES, THE DOOR WILL TAKE AT LEAST 3SECONDS TO MOVE TO A POINT 3" FROM THE LATCH, MEASURED TO THE LEADING EDGE OF THE DOOR.-THE MAXIMUM FORCE FOR PUSHING OR PULLING OPEN AND INTERIOR OR SLIDING DOOR SHALL BE 5LBF. THESE FORCES DO NOT APPLY TO THE FORCE REQUIRED TO RETRACT LATCH BOLTS ORDISENGAGE OTHER DEVICES THAT MAY HOLD THE DOOR IN A CLOSED POSITION.- ONE VAN ACCESSIBLE (16' WIDE) PARKING SPACE REQUIRED - SEE SITE PLAN.- FURNISH AND INSTALL SIGN AT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL PER TRANS 200.07 WITH AN ADDITIONALSIGN BELOW INDICATING VAN ACCESSIBILITY.48" MAX.LIGHTSWITCHLIGHT SWITCH AND OUTLETACCESSIBLE MOUNTING HEIGHTOUTLET15" MIN.EXISTING THIRD ANDFOURTH FLOORPLANS ANDACCESSIBILITYDETAILS 2222222111134565656565656567778EXISTING CASEWORKAND APPLIANCES TOREMAINEXISTING ELECTRICALPANEL TO REMAINTYPICAL INTERIOR PARTITION(SEE GENERAL NOTES FOR5/8" GYP. BD. EA. SIDETOILET ROOM & WET WALLSSOUND BATT INSUL. P1UNIT DEMISING WALL(2) LAYERS R-115/8" GYP. BD. EA. SIDE2 x 4 STAGGERED STUDSP3@ 16" O.C. ON 2 x 6 PLATESOUND BATT INSUL.UL DESIGN NO. U340(1) HOUR RATINGP4UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISEINTERIOR PARTITION5/8" GYP. BD. EA. SIDE2 x 8 STUDS @ 2'-0" O.C.2 x 4 STUDS @ 16" O.C.AT BEARING WALLS &2 x 4 STUDS @ 2'-0" O.C.AT NONBEARING WALLS(SOUND BATT INSUL. ATPLUMB. WALLS)SHEATHING REQUIREMENTS)(SEE GENERAL NOTES FORTOILET ROOM & WET WALLSSHEATHING REQUIREMENTS)(SEE GENERAL NOTES FORTOILET ROOM & WET WALLSSHEATHING REQUIREMENTS)5/8" GYP. BD. EA. SIDESOUND BATT INSUL.INTERIOR PARTITION (MATCH EXISTING)P2(SEE GENERAL NOTES FORTOILET ROOM & WET WALLSSHEATHING REQUIREMENTS)STC RATING: 54UL DESIGN NO. U311(1) HOUR RATING2 x 6 STUDS @ 16" O.C.AT BEARING WALLS &1/2" RESILIENT CHANNELGENERAL NOTES:1.FRAME ALL WALLS TO DECK ABOVE.2.PLUMBING FIXTURE WALLS: PROVIDE 5/8"GLASS MAT GYPSUM TILE BACKER BOARD ATWALLS SCHEDULED TO RECEIVED TILE.3.REST ROOM WALLS NOT SCHEDULED TORECEIVED TILE: PROVIDE 5/8" WATER/MOLDRESISTANT GYPSUM BOARD.CLOSETBATHEX. TOILETEX. TOILETBATHEX. MECH.BEDROOMBATHKITCHENLIVING ROOMKITCHENBEDROOMLIVING/BEDROOMLIVING/KITCHENEX. MECH.413415417UNIT #413REMODELUNIT #415REMODELA1041CLOSETROD & SHELF P324" TOWELBARTPHGBGBGB1'-6"20 MIN.CLOSETROD & SHELFCLOSETROD & SHELFCLOSETROD & SHELF20 MIN.20 MIN.20 MIN.20 MIN.EX.MECH.EX.MECH.3'-2"5'-4 1/2"6'-3 1/2"5'-2 1/2"2'-2 1/2"5'-7 1/2"3'-9 1/2"14'-5"14'-5"± 6'-5 1/2"2'-2 1/2"3 1/2"4'-10"2'-10"4'-10"19'-8"45°45°5'-1 1/2"8'-9 1/2" 5'-4 1/2"8'-2 1/2"9'-4 1/2"3'-5"3'-11"5'-0"3'-2"3'-2" 11'-1 1/2"2'-9 1/2" 3'-0"TPHTPHGBGBGBGBGBGB1'-6"1'-6"36"X36"MIRROR24"X36"MIRROR30"X36"MIRROR24" TOWELBAR24" TOWELBARP3P3P2P2P2P2P2P22A104435EXISTING CASEWORKAND SINK TO REMAINA10465 SIM.7A1045 SIM.109A1048413A 413B415A 441417A 417D417C417B442413C413D 415BLINENUNIT #417REMODELEXISTING ELECTRICALPANEL TO REMAIN511 SF625 SF816 SFA10414REMOVE EXISTINGSTOVE/OVEN, INFILL W/COUNTERTOP &BACKSPLASH, SEE INTERIORELEVATIONSROD & SHELF A102THE DESIGNS AND PLANS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGSARE THE PROPERTY OF AYRES ASSOCIATES. ALL RIGHTSARE RESERVED. NO DESIGNS OR PLANS SHALL BEUSED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY FORM OR BY ANY MEANSWITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF AYRES ASSOCIATES.ASSOCIATES17 OCTOBER 2019PROJECT NO. 08-1899.00I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THISPLAN SPECIFICATION OR REPORTWAS PREPARED BY ME ORUNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONAND THAT I AM DULYREGISTERED ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OFNUMBER:WISCONSIN.MINNESOTA.MARKDATEDESCRIPTIONEau Claire Office 3433 Oakwood Hills Parkway Eau Claire, Wisconsin 54702 (715) 834-3161 River Falls Office 215 N. Second Street Suite 204 River Falls, Wisconsin 54022 (715) 426-4908 Fax: (715) 426-5866 EDINA, MN YORK GARDENS SENIOR LIVING COMMON AREA RENOVATION CB NO. 12/13/20201GENERAL NOTES:-THE DESIGN / BUILD ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATEILLUMINATION LEVELS AND EMERGENCY / EXIT LIGHTING AS REQUIRED PERCODE. LIGHT FIXTURE LAYOUT SHOWN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY.- VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL LIGHT FIXTURES BEFORE FRAMING IS COMPLETE TOCOORDINATE ALL BACKING AND FIXTURE LOCATIONS EXACTLY.- PROVIDE SMOKE DETECTION AS REQUIRED BY CODE.- COORDINATE WITH ALL DESIGN / BUILD SUBCONTRACTORS ALL REQUIREDOPENINGS, NOT INDICATED HEREIN.- REFER TO ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE .NUMBERED DEMOLITION NOTES1.REMOVE EXISTING WALL SHOWN DASHED. PATCH ANDREPAIR ALL ADJACENT SURFACES TO RECEIVE NEWFINISHES.2.REMOVE EXISTING DOOR, FRAME AND RELATED HARDWARE.3.COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL EXISTING PLUMBING FIXTURESAND ASSOCIATED PIPING & FITTINGS IN THIS AREA.(COORDINATE WITH THE DESIGN/BUILD MECHANICALCONTRACTOR.)4.COMPLETELY REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW. PREPAREADJACENT SURFACES TO RECEIVE NEW FINISHES AND TRIM.5.COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL EXISTING FINISHES IN THIS AREAINCLUDING CARPET, TILE, BASE, ETC. (PREPARE SURFACESTO RECEIVE NEW FINISHES)6.COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURES.(COORDINATE WITH THE DESIGN/ BUILD ELECTRICALCONTRACTOR.)7.REMOVE EXISTING CASEWORK, COUNTERTOP, PLUMBINGFIXTURES, APPLIANCES AND ASSOCIATED HARDWARE8.REMOVE EXISTING STAIRS.FOURTH FLOOR DEMO PLANS C A L E : 1/4" = 1'-0"1A102PLAN NORTHEXISTING DOOR TOREMAINNEW OR RELOCATEDDOORDRAWING KEYEXISTING WALLTO REMAINNEW WALLGENERAL NOTES:- COORDINATE WITH THE DESIGN / BUILD MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL,FIRE PROTECTION & PLUMBING SUBCONTRACTORS FOR ALLREQUIRED OPENINGS, NOT INDICATED HEREIN.FOURTH FLOOR PLANS C A L E : 1/4" = 1'-0"2A102PLAN NORTHWALL TYPESS C A L E : NO SCALE3A102FOURTH FLOOR DEMOPLAN, FOURTH FLOORPLAN AND WALLTYPES11 11111112EXIST. CLG. TO REMAINEXIST. CLG. TO REMAINEXIST. CLG. TO REMAINEXIST. CLG. TO REMAINEXIST. CLG. TOREMAINEXIST. CLG. TO REMAINEXIST. CLG. TO REMAINEXIST. CLG. TO REMAINEXIST. 7'-8" SOFFIT TO REMAINEXIST. 7'-8" SOFFIT TO REMAINEXIST. 8'-0" SOFFITTO REMAINEXIST. CLG. TO REMAIN.EXIST. 8'-0" SOFFITTO REMAINEXIST. CLG.TO REMAINEXIST. CLG. TO REMAINEXIST. CLG.TO REMAINEXIST. CLG.TO REMAINEXIST. CLG.TO REMAINEXIST. CLG.TO REMAINEXIST. CLG. TO REMAINEXIST. CLG. TO REMAINEXIST. 7'-8" SOFFIT TO REMAINEXIST. 7'-8" SOFFIT TO REMAINEXIST. 8'-0" SOFFITTO REMAINEXIST. CLG.TO REMAIN.EXIST.GYP. BD.CLG. TO REMAINPATCH, FINISH AND RE-PAINT ALL EXISTINGGYP. BD. CLGS. AND SOFFITS, TYP.EXIST.GYP. BD.CLG. TO REMAINEXIST.GYP. BD.CLG. TO REMAINEXIST. GYP. BD.CLG. TO REMAINNEW 7'-8" SOFFITTO MATCH EXIST.PROVIDE NEWRETURN GRILL INSOFFITNEW 8'-0" SOFFITTO MATCH EXIST.EXIST. 8'-0" SOFFITTO REMAINEXIST.GYP. BD.CLG. TO REMAINEXIST.GYP. BD.CLG. TO REMAINEXTEND EXIST.DUCTWORK ASREQ'D.A103THE DESIGNS AND PLANS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGSARE THE PROPERTY OF AYRES ASSOCIATES. ALL RIGHTSARE RESERVED. NO DESIGNS OR PLANS SHALL BEUSED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY FORM OR BY ANY MEANSWITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF AYRES ASSOCIATES.ASSOCIATES17 OCTOBER 2019PROJECT NO. 08-1899.00I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THISPLAN SPECIFICATION OR REPORTWAS PREPARED BY ME ORUNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONAND THAT I AM DULYREGISTERED ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OFNUMBER:WISCONSIN.MINNESOTA.MARKDATEDESCRIPTIONEau Claire Office 3433 Oakwood Hills Parkway Eau Claire, Wisconsin 54702 (715) 834-3161 River Falls Office 215 N. Second Street Suite 204 River Falls, Wisconsin 54022 (715) 426-4908 Fax: (715) 426-5866 EDINA, MN YORK GARDENS SENIOR LIVING COMMON AREA RENOVATION CB NO. 12/13/20201NUMBERED DEMOLITION NOTES1.REMOVE EXISTING ACT CEILING TILES, GRID, LIGHT FIXTURES, CURTAIN TRACK, ETC. AND RELATEDHARDWARE. PATCH AND REPAIR ALL ADJACENT SURFACES TO RECEIVE NEW FINISHES.2.REMOVE EXISTING SOFFIT AS REQ'D. PATCH AND REPAIR ALL ADJACENT SURFACES TO RECEIVE NEWFINISHES.FOURTH FLOOR DEMO PLANS C A L E : 1/4" = 1'-0"1A103PLAN NORTHFOURTH FLOOR PLANS C A L E : 1/4" = 1'-0"2A103PLAN NORTHFOURTH FLOOR DEMOCEILING PLAN FOURTHFLOOR REFLECTEDCEILING PLANLIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE:WALL SCONCE / WALL MOUNTSURFACE MOUNTCOMBINATION LIGHT / BATHROOM FANGENERAL NOTES:-THE DESIGN / BUILD ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE ILLUMINATION LEVELS ANDEMERGENCY / EXIT LIGHTING AS REQUIRED PER CODE. LIGHT FIXTURE LAYOUT SHOWN IS FOR REFERENCEONLY.- VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL LIGHT FIXTURES WITH OWNER BEFORE FRAMING IS COMPLETE TO COORDINATE ALLBACKING AND FIXTURE LOCATIONS EXACTLY.- THE HVAC SYSTEM INCLUDING DIFFUSER LAYOUT WILL BE DESIGN / BUILD BY THE MECHANICALSUBCONTRACTOR(S).- THE HVAC SUBCONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR BALANCING AND ENSURING AN EFFICIENT SYSTEM.- PROVIDE SMOKE DETECTION AS REQUIRED BY CODE.- PROVIDE AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM AS REQUIRED BY CODE.- COORDINATE WITH ALL DESIGN / BUILD SUBCONTRACTORS ALL REQUIRED OPENINGS, NOT INDICATED HEREIN.- REFER TO ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE .- PROVIDE ACCESS PANELS TO FAN COIL UNITS WHERE UNIT LOCATED ABOVE GYPSUM CEILING, SEEMECHANICAL.GENERAL NOTES:1.THE DESIGN/BUILD ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE ILLUMINATION LEVELSREQUESTED BY THE TENANT AND EMERGENCY/ EXIT LIGHTING AS REQUIRED BY CODE. LIGHTFIXTURE LAYOUT IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY.2.FINAL LIGHTING PLAN, REQUIRED CALCULATIONS AND STATE SUBMITTAL BY THE DESIGN/BUILDELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR.3.THE HVAC SYSTEM INCLUDING DIFFUSER LAYOUT WILL BE DESIGN/BUILD BY THE MECHANICALSUBCONTRACTOR.4.FIRE PROTECTION SUBCONTRACTOR TO MODIFY THE AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM & HEADLAYOUT TO ACCOMMODATE THE NEW WORK.NOTE:VERIFY SOFFIT SIZE/FREE AREA WITH MECH. 2'-0"3'-0"2'-0"2'-6"3'-0"2'-6"INTERIOR ELEVATIONS C A L E : 1/4" = 1'-0"UNIT 4178A10410'-0"MICRO2'-6"SINKREFRIG. 3'-0"TOWEL BAR4" 3'-0"36" GRAB BAR,TYP.4" BASE, TYP.INTERIOR ELEVATIONS C A L E : 1/4" = 1'-0"9A104UNIT 417INTERIOR ELEVATIONS C A L E : 1/4" = 1'-0"10A1042'-10"3'-0"VERIFY30" x 36" MIRROR"SHAKER" STYLE FLATPANEL VANITY CABINETUNIT 4174" BASE, TYP.CULTURED MARBLECOUNTERTOP &BACKSPLASH, TYP.'L'-SHAPED GRAB BARS ATSHOWER STALL, TYP.BUILT-IN PULL-DOWNSHOWER SEAT @ACCESSIBLE UNITS. PROVIDESOLID BLOCKING IN WALLFOR FUTURE INSTALLATIONAT ALL OTHER LOCATIONSPREFAB. ROLL-IN TYPESHOWER UNIT W/CRUSHABLE THRESHOLD &NON SKID FLOOR, TYP.3'-0" 4"3'-0"36" GRAB BAR,TYP.4" BASE, TYP.7'-4"2'-0"36" x 36" MIRROR"SHAKER" STYLE FLATPANEL CABINET W/ 4ADJUSTABLE SHELVES,OPEN BELOW FORPULLOUT HAMPERCULTURED MARBLECOUNTERTOP &BACKSPLASH, TYP.4'-0"2'-10" 3'-0" 3'-0" 4" 4"4'-0"42" GRAB BAR,TYP.18" GRAB BAR,TYP.4" BASE, TYP.TOILET PAPER HOLDER, TYP. INTERIOR ELEVATIONS C A L E : 1/4" = 1'-0"5A104TYP. UNITINTERIOR ELEVATIONS C A L E : 1/4" = 1'-0"UNIT 4133A104INTERIOR ELEVATIONS C A L E : 1/4" = 1'-0"TYP. UNIT4A104INTERIOR ELEVATIONS C A L E : 1/4" = 1'-0"UNIT 4156A104INTERIOR ELEVATIONS C A L E : 1/4" = 1'-0"UNIT 4137A1042'-10""SHAKER" STYLE FLATPANEL VANITYCABINET4"3'-0"36" GRABBAR, TYP.2'-6"PREFAB. ROLL-INTYPE SHOWER UNITW/ CRUSHABLETHRESHOLD & NONSKID FLOOR, TYP.4" TOE KICK4" TOE KICK4" BASE,TYP.4" TOE KICK'L'-SHAPED GRAB BARS ATSHOWER STALL, TYP.BUILT-IN PULL-DOWNSHOWER SEAT @ACCESSIBLE UNITS. PROVIDESOLID BLOCKING IN WALLFOR FUTURE INSTALLATIONAT ALL OTHER LOCATIONSPREFAB. ROLL-IN TYPESHOWER UNIT W/CRUSHABLE THRESHOLD &NON SKID FLOOR, TYP.4" BASE, TYP.CULTUREDMARBLECOUNTERTOP &BACKSPLASH, TYP.24" x 36"MIRROR'L'-SHAPED GRAB BARS ATSHOWER STALL, TYP.BUILT-IN PULL-DOWNSHOWER SEAT @ACCESSIBLE UNITS. PROVIDESOLID BLOCKING IN WALLFOR FUTURE INSTALLATIONAT ALL OTHER LOCATIONSPREFAB. ROLL-IN TYPESHOWER UNIT W/CRUSHABLE THRESHOLD &NON SKID FLOOR, TYP.3'-0"4" TOE KICKPLAM COUNTERTOP &BACKSPLASH TYP."SHAKER" STYLE FLATPANEL UPPER CABINET W/ADJUSTABLE SHELVING1x4 WOOD TRIM,TYP."SHAKER" STYLE FLATPANEL BASE CABINET W/TWO ROLLOUT SHELVESREFRIG.2'-0"2'-6"1'-6"2'-9"3'-3"2'-6"1'-6"2'-6"3'-0"1'-6"INTERIOR ELEVATIONS C A L E : 1/4" = 1'-0"UNIT 4131A10411'-0"MICROINTERIOR ELEVATIONS C A L E : 1/4" = 1'-0"UNIT 4132A104SINK1'-3"3'-0"1'-3"1'-3"3'-0"2'-6"3'-0"1'-6"1'-0"UNDERCABINETLT. W/ 3" VALANCE,(SEE 13/A100)PLAM COUNTERTOP& BACKSPLASH TYP.1x4 WOOD TRIM,TYP.4" TOE KICK7'-0"FINISHED ENDFINISHED END4" TOE KICKPLAM COUNTERTOP &BACKSPLASH TYP."SHAKER" STYLE FLATPANEL UPPER CABINET W/ADJUSTABLE SHELVING"SHAKER" STYLE FLATPANEL UPPER CABINETW/ ADJUSTABLESHELVING1'-6"1'-3"1x4 WOOD TRIM,TYP."SHAKER" STYLE FLATPANEL BASE CABINET W/TWO ROLLOUT SHELVES"SHAKER" STYLE FLATPANEL BASE CABINETW/ TWO ROLLOUTSHELVESOPEN2'-6"2'-6"3'-0"OPEN1'-6"FINISHEDEND PANEL6" 1'-0"S C A L E :1/4" = 1'-0"SEEDOORSCHEDULESEE DOOR SCHEDULE2WOOD PREHUNGDOOR FRAMESEEDOORSCHEDULESEE DOOR SCHEDULE3WOOD BI-FOLD DOORFRAME CASEDOPENINGWOODTRIM ATPERIMETER OFCASEDOPENINGWOODTRIM ATPERIMETER11 3/4"SEE SCHED.1 3/4"1 3/4"PRE-FINISHED METALKNOCK-DOWN FRAME20-MIN. RATED WOOD CLADSEEDOORSCHEDULE3"VALANCE DETAILS C A L E : 1 1/2" = 1'-0"13A104PROVIDE 3"EXTENSION ONDOORS WHEREVALANCE OCCURSP. LAM. BOTHSIDES & BOTTOMOF VALANCESEE ELECTRICAL LIGHTING PLAN FORLOCATION AND TYPE OF FIXTURE.WOOD BLOCKINGAS REQUIREDREFRIG.FIELDINTERIOR ELEVATIONS C A L E : 1/4" = 1'-0"UNIT 41514A104MICROEXISTING PLAMCOUNTERTOP &BACKSPLASH TYP.EXISTING UPPERCABINETS TO REMAINEXISTING LOWERCABINETS TO REMAINVERIFY2'-6"NEW PLAMCOUNTERTOP &BACKSPLASH TYP.EXIST.A104THE DESIGNS AND PLANS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGSARE THE PROPERTY OF AYRES ASSOCIATES. ALL RIGHTSARE RESERVED. NO DESIGNS OR PLANS SHALL BEUSED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY FORM OR BY ANY MEANSWITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF AYRES ASSOCIATES.ASSOCIATES17 OCTOBER 2019PROJECT NO. 08-1899.00I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THISPLAN SPECIFICATION OR REPORTWAS PREPARED BY ME ORUNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONAND THAT I AM DULYREGISTERED ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OFNUMBER:WISCONSIN.MINNESOTA.MARKDATEDESCRIPTIONEau Claire Office 3433 Oakwood Hills Parkway Eau Claire, Wisconsin 54702 (715) 834-3161 River Falls Office 215 N. Second Street Suite 204 River Falls, Wisconsin 54022 (715) 426-4908 Fax: (715) 426-5866 EDINA, MN YORK GARDENS SENIOR LIVING COMMON AREA RENOVATION CB NO. 12/13/20201INTERIORELEVATIONS, DOORTYPES, FRAME TYPESAND DOOR SCHEDULEOPENINGNUMBERTYPE :FRAMETYPE :DOORHEAD XWJAMB XHSILLTLABELFIREHDWNOTES DOOR SCHEDULE413D2413B21 3/8"3'-0"415A413C-HARDWARE SCHEDULE* VERIFY KEYING SCHEDULE WITH OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.* HARDWARE FINISH: MATCH EXISTINGTYPICAL UNIT ENTRY DOOREACH DOOR TO HAVE:1.5 PR. BUTTS1 LOCKSET1 CLOSER1 SET SEALSGROUP #1--1 3/4"F2--1TYPICAL UNIT INTERIOR DOOREACH DOOR TO HAVE:1.5 PR. BUTTS1 LOCKSETGROUP #2TYPICAL MECH. ROOM DOOREACH DOOR TO HAVE:1.5 PR. BUTTS1 LOCKSET1 CLOSER1 SET SEALSGROUP #334'-6"F335'-0"F31F11413A11 3/4"3'-0"F17'-0"6'-8"6'-8"6'-8"417C1417A11 3/4"3'-0"417D417BF1222415B4414421 3/4"1 3/4"20 MIN3313'-0"F11F120 MIN20 MIN20 MIN20 MIN1 3/8"1 3/8"3'-0"--35'-0"F36'-8"1 3/8"21 3/8"3'-0"-F26'-8"21 3/8"3'-0"-F26'-8"21 3/8"3'-0"-F26'-8"3'-0"BI-FOLD DOOR HARDWAREBI-FOLD DOOR HARDWAREBI-FOLD DOOR HARDWARE7'-0"7'-0"7'-0"7'-0"111 CLOSETBATHEX. TOILETEX. TOILETBATHEX. MECH.BEDROOMBATHKITCHENLIVING ROOMKITCHENBEDROOMLIVING/BEDROOMLIVING/KITCHENEX. HALLEX. MECH.413415417UNIT #413REMODELUNIT #415REMODELCLOSET CLOSETCLOSETCLOSETEX.MECH.EX.MECH.UNIT #417REMODEL511 SF625 SF816 SFSV1EXG CPTSV1C1EXGP1C1EXG CPTSV1C1SV1P1C1P1C1P1C1P1SV1P1EXGP1EXGP1EXGEXGEXGEXGSV1P1SV1P1C1P1C1P1VCT1P1EXGP1C1P1EXGP3,P4EXGEXGEXG LVTC1C2EXG CPTC1C2F101THE DESIGNS AND PLANS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGSARE THE PROPERTY OF AYRES ASSOCIATES. ALL RIGHTSARE RESERVED. NO DESIGNS OR PLANS SHALL BEUSED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY FORM OR BY ANY MEANSWITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF AYRES ASSOCIATES.ASSOCIATES17 OCTOBER 2019PROJECT NO. 08-1899.00I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THISPLAN SPECIFICATION OR REPORTWAS PREPARED BY ME ORUNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONAND THAT I AM DULYREGISTERED ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OFNUMBER:WISCONSIN.MINNESOTA.MARKDATEDESCRIPTIONEau Claire Office 3433 Oakwood Hills Parkway Eau Claire, Wisconsin 54702 (715) 834-3161 River Falls Office 215 N. Second Street Suite 204 River Falls, Wisconsin 54022 (715) 426-4908 Fax: (715) 426-5866 EDINA, MN YORK GARDENS SENIOR LIVING COMMON AREA RENOVATION CB NO. 12/13/20201FOURTH FLOOR FINISH PLANS C A L E : 1/4" = 1'-0"1F101PLAN NORTHFOURTH FLOORFINISH PLAN ANDSCHEDULE Edina, Hennepin, MetroGIS | © WSB & Associates 2013, © WSB & Associates2013 Site Location July 16, 2020 1 in = 752 ft / 04-29-2020MOVE THIS SIGNCLOSER TO THESIDEWALKIF THE CITY WILL ALLOW THE PARKING TOEXTEND INTO THE SETBACK AS IS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN THE 3 PARKING STALLS WILL FIT AT THE SITE ENTRANCE OFF OF PARK LAWN AVENUE.PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINE312ACCESSIBLE SIDEWALKADD 3 PARKING STALLSPROPOSAL FOR ADDITIONAL PARKING AT YORK GARDENSNORTHScale 1"= 40'-0" Edina, Hennepin, MetroGIS, Edina, Hennepin, MetroGIS | © WSB & Associates2013, © WSB & Associates 2013 Site Location Legend Addresses July 16, 2020 1 in = 376 ft / Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: IX.G. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Sketch Plan Review for 6600-6800 France Avenue Discussion CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: No action requested. Provide the applicant non-binding comments on a potential redevelopment proposal. INTRODUCTION: The City Council is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to re-develop the 22-acre parcel at 6600-6800 France. The applicant is proposing a significant change to the development plans that were approved for this site in 2017. In 2017, this site was rezoned to PUD for a mixed-use development project (The Avenue on France). The approved plans did a very nice job of following the Southdale Design Experience Guidelines. The plans included below grade parking, dividing the site into smaller parcels, preserving the mature oaks, providing the 50-foot setback from France Avenue with green space and sidewalks, storefronts on France with the new retail buildings. (See attached approved Plans.) T he approved plans were found to meet the PUD standards to justify a doubling of the density on the site. The proposed plans shall be reviewed to those same standards to justify increasing the density of the site. The applicant is NOT entitled the density that was approved for the previous request. The underlying zoning of the site is POD, Planned Office District which allowed and FAR of .5; the approved PUD allowed up to 1.0. as long as the plans approved in the PUD were followed. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report to Planning Commission, Aug. 12, 2020 Proposed Narrative and Plans Proposed Square Footage Plan Memo from the city engineer regarding the water treatment facility Memo from the fire chief regarding the fire station location Review of the Plans from Mic Johnson AFO, Architecture Field Office 2017 Approved Plans for the Site Potential Building Sites from the Design Experience Guidelines City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City Hall • Phone 952-927-8861 Fax 952-826-0389 • www.CityofEdina.com Date: August 12, 2020 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Sketch Plan Review – 6600-6800 France Avenue The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to re-develop the 22-acre parcel at 6600-6800 France. The applicant is proposing a significant change to the development plans that were approved for this site in 2017. In 2017, this site was rezoned to PUD for a mixed-use development project (The Avenue on France). The approved plans did a very nice job of following the Southdale Design Experience Guidelines. The plans included below grade parking, dividing the site into smaller parcels, preserving the mature oaks, providing the 50-foot setback from France Avenue with green space and sidewalks, storefronts on France with the new retail buildings. (See attached approved Plans.) The approved plans were found to meet the PUD standards to justify a doubling of the density on the site. The proposed plans shall be reviewed to those same standards to justify increasing the density of the site. The applicant is NOT entitled the density that was approved for the previous request. The underlying zoning of the site is POD, Planned Office District which allowed and FAR of .5; the approved PUD allowed up to 1.0. as long as the plans approved in the PUD were followed. As proposed, at full built out, the site would include the following new structures: Office Space – 297,895 square feet (10 stories) Medical Office – 85,000 square feet (4 stories) Rental Apartments – 210 units (13 stories) Retail/Restaurants - 25,000 square feet (1 story) Parking Structures Above Grade (3) – (4, 5 & 5 Decks) Municipal Water Treatment Plan (Concept Proposed) Public Safety/Fire Station (Concept Proposed) To accommodate the request the following is required: A Rezoning Ordinance Amendment to revise the existing PUD. The existing PUD would only allow the development of the plans approved in 2017; and City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 A Revised Overall Development Plan and Site Plan Review. The Southdale Area Development Principles have been shared with the applicant; they have tried to incorporate the core principles into the proposed plans. Sidewalks are proposed completely around and through the site; they are providing the 50-foot setback on France Avenue with green space and sidewalks; have created storefronts on France with the new retail buildings. (See attached Plans.) Mic Johnson, AFO, Architectural Field Office has provided a review of the project. (See attached.) The fire chief and city engineer have provided memos regarding the proposed fire station and water treatment facility. (See attached.) As demonstrated on the following table, the FAR and height of the proposed development is not allowed by current City Code. Compliance Table City Standard (POD-2) Existing PUD Proposed New Building Setbacks Front – France Ave Front – Valley View Front - 66th Street Parking Setbacks Front – France Ave Front – Valley View Front - 66th Street 35 feet or the height of the building 35 feet or the height of the building 35 feet or the height of the building 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 45 feet 100 feet 50 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 50 feet 20*-100 feet 50 feet 50 feet 50 feet 50 feet Building Height 4 Stories or 48 feet whichever is less 8 stories and 96 feet (No building shall be taller than the existing building at 6,800France) 13 stories – Apartment* 10 stories – Office* 4 stories – Medical 1 story – Retail Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) .50 of the tract Tract size = 21.78 acres or 948,736 s.f. 474,316 s.f. MAX 1.0 (948,736 s.f.) 1.14 (1,081,684 s.f.)* Parking Stalls – Entire Site Mixed Use District 3,118 spaces total Nonresidential = 1/300 s.f. (2,751 spaces) Residential = 1 enclosed space/unit (210) + .75 spaces exposed per unit (157) 488 surface spaces 1,399 underground spaces 1,887 Total 2,933 stalls proposed * Change to the Approved PUD City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 As stated in the Design Experience Guidelines “Flexibility is not a right, but rather the natural by-product of a fair exchange for benefits, collaboration, and quality in development.” Additional Considerations/Staff Concerns Concern over the removal of the mature Oak Trees on Valley View Road to build a parking structure. Project seems to turn its back on the neighborhood to the west. The three parking structures face Valley View Road. No transition to the single-family neighborhood to the west, as suggested in the design experience guidelines. No building should be longer than 200 feet. First floor height of all new buildings must be 20 feet with 75% of the building fronts being transparent. Tall buildings should be stepped back from the street per the design experience guidelines. Proposed height exceeds the PUD by five stories. Project appears to be too dense for the site with little public realm other than within the required setback areas. The applicant must meet the City’s Affordable Housing Policy. Interior sidewalks are located adjacent to drive-aisles which do not make for a comfortable pedestrian environment. Sidewalks should be considered for bike traffic including the perimeter sidewalk around the side, which could have the width expended to allow for a shared bike and pedestrian path. The developer has not committed to donating the land to the city on which they are showing a public safety (fire station) and water treatment facility. Staff views this as a must to satisfy the give to get concept to justify the requested increase in density and height proposed on the site. The applicant will also be asked to respond to the city’s Sustainability Questionnaire within their formally submitted plans. A traffic and parking study would be required to determine the impacts on adjacent roadways. The study would include the full development buildout. Parking data and square footage of buildings has not been provided. Project should provide parking that is needed for the development and not based on city code. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Watershed district review. Review and approval of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District is required. Sustainable design. As part of any formal application, sustainable design should be included. PUD The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 1 City Of Edina Sketch Plan Submission | 07.29.2020 FRANCEon FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 2 Sketch Plan N arrative Sketch Plan Narrative Southdale Office Partners, LLC and its project team (McGough, HGA, Kimley-Horn, and CushmanWakefield) is pleased to present a redevelopment proposal for the approximately 21.69 acre Southdale Office Center site at 6600 – 6800 France Ave South. The project proposes to create a vibrant mixed-use site and significantly enhance the existing 1970s era office park, expanding and bringing new amenities to an important Edina employment hub. Objectives of the redevelopment include: • Expand and enhance the site as a center of employment and economic vitality by replacing two outdated and non-code compliant buildings with one new office building, linking the existing 6600 and 6800 buildings, creating a best-in-class destination for employers and their staff. • Use the Greater Southdale District Plan and Design Experience Guidelines to guide site improvements in support of the City’s vision: creating a new and welcoming gateway experience to the France Ave Southdale District, subdividing the superblock into smaller parcels oriented toward a pedestrian scale, & providing a variety of outdoor gathering areas and new urban plazas. • Replace the existing surface parking lots with buildings, amenities, structured parking, and programmed outdoor space. A mix of uses, including office, dining and service retail, residen- tial, and medical office, will create a thriving, vibrant project that serves as a key transition between Southdale Mall and the neighborhoods and parks to the west. • Successfully solve for the parking demand of both new uses on the site AND the existing demand from 6600 and 6800 buildings, in a manner that is market viable, and considerate of adjacent properties. • Increase stormwater management capacity on the site to eliminate the surface flooding that occurs. This will benefit the neighborhood to the west and improve water quality in Lake Cornelia. • Incorporate sustainability strategies into planning, design and operations focused on human health impact, energy efficiency, and climate change. • Potentially incorporate the municipal infrastructure and services that have been contemplated, like a domestic water treatment plant and a public safety/fire station. This site was entitled for redevelopment in 2016/2017. The proposed concept at the time proved to rely too heavily on below-grade parking and destination retail. The high-water table at the site prevented that quantity of below-grade parking from being delivered at a price-point that building users were willing to pay. The retail industry has shifted drastically since 2016/2017 – and again even in the last 6 months! Destination and hard-goods retailers want to be on the east side of France Avenue and are willing to pay a premium for that location. The mix of surface, below-grade, and structured parking now proposed can be delivered at a more reasonable price-point, one that better aligns with the market. The limited amount of retail now proposed is service and dining focused, catering to the users of the site and those in the neighborhood. Recognizing that this project would be a significant change to the neighborhood, over the last month we have engaged with the neighbors in a variety of formats: letters mailed, Lake Cor- nelia and Point of France associations contacted and meetings held with leaders, project email account established, printed materials delivered to Point of France, two formal Zoom presenta- tions and Q&A sessions (we hosted a small group live meeting option for one of those meetings), distribution of the recordings of the Zoom meetings, on-site meetings with individuals and groups, phone calls and email exchanges. Our Sketch Plan slides are organized around the types of questions and concerns we’ve heard from the neighbors and our attempts to acknowl- edge and respond. This is a great opportunity to revitalize an aging office park and seek the highest and best uses for the site and the community. To achieve a meaningful revitalization, the development will need to incorporate greater density to generate the investment needed to make the necessary improvements. We request the City continue to consider the creation of a tax increment financing district at the site to assist in offsetting the costs associated with the public goals achieved through the redevelopment of the site. Using the Greater Southdale District Plan and De- sign Experience Guidelines has helped us prepare a new vision that we believe will become a market-viable, gateway project for the France Avenue corridor, welcoming employees, residents, and visitors to the Southdale neighborhood. FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 3 Existing Site C onditions - Site Aerial FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 4 310 197 189 161 473 69 82 38 54 21 Existing Buildings To Remain Type Stories RSF Parking Ratio Parking Demand E1 695000,1 / 3367,8916eciffOevA ecnarF S 0066 E2 031000,1 / 3662,343eciffOevA ecnarF S 0076 E3 6740 S France Ave (Tavern on France)Restaurant 1 + Basement 7,525 + Patio 3 / 1,000 E4 621000,1 / 3000,243eciffOevA ecnarF S 0576 E5 294000,1 / 3558,3617eciffOevA ecnarF S 0086 sllatS gnikraPseirotSepyT E1 831dnuorgrednUevA ecnarF S 0066 E5 451dnuorgrednUevA ecnarF S 0086 205,1ecafruSetiS Total 1,594 Existing Parking Existing Buildings Existing Parking Existing Buildings Existing Site C onditions - Buildings & Parking M etrics FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 5 Existing Site C onditions - Buildings FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 6 Existing Site C onditions - Buildings FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 7 0’ 50’ 100’ 200’400’ FRANCE AVENUE W 66TH STREETW 69TH STREETVALLEY VIEW ROA D E5 E4 E3 E2 E1 Pervious Surface Impervious Surface 259,504 SF (5.95 Acres) = of Site Area 686,316 SF (15.76 Acres) = of Site Area Property Line Zoning Setback (35’) Southdale Design Experience Guidelines Setback (50’) Bank of America ATM Easement 945,820 SF (21.71 Acres) 806,145 SF (18.51 Acres) 747,735 SF (17.17 Acres) 50’35’ Existing Site C onditions - Pervious & Im pervious Surfaces FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 8 0’ 50’ 100’ 200’400’ FRANCE AVENUE W 66TH STREETW 69TH STREETVALLEY VIEW ROA D E5 E4 E3 E2 E1 Area of Frequent Flooding Below Grade Water Table Elevations Water Table 18’ Below Grade Water Table 20’ Below Grade Water Table 11’ Below Grade Existing Site C onditions - Storm Event Flooding Area FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 9 0’ 50’ 100’ 200’400’ ** RETAIL / RESTAURANT RETAIL / RESTAURANT RESIDENTIALRETAIL / RESTAURANT MEDICAL/ OFFICE OFFICE GREENWAY / BIO-FILTRATION PARKING PARKING PARKING FRANCE AVENUE W 66TH STREETW 69TH STREETVALLEY VIEW ROA D E5 E1 Southdale Design Experience Guidelines Setback (50’) 270’ Small-Scale Blocks Primary Vehicular Site Circulation Primary Pedestrian Site Circulation Site Entry Points (*County Road Curb Cuts) C om m unity Engagem ent M eeting 1 Recap FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 10 FRANCE AVENUE W 66TH STREETW 69TH STREETVALLEY VIEW ROA D PROMENADE GREENWAY BOULEVARD PLAZA PLAZA RETAIL / RESTAURANTRETAIL / RESTAURANT NEW OFFICE PUBLIC SAFETY PARKING EXISTING OFFICE EXISTING OFFICE RESIDENTIAL PARKING PARKING MEDICAL OFFICE WATER TREATMENT PLANT 0’ 50’ 100’ 200’400’ Proposed Site Plan FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 11 FRANCE A V E N U E W 66 T H S T R E E T W 69TH STREETVALLEY VIE W R O A D RETAIL / RESTAURANT RETAIL / RESTAURANT NEW OFFICE PUBLIC SAFETY PARKING EXISTING OFFICE EXISTING OFFICE RESIDENTIAL PARKING PARKING MEDICAL OFFICE WATER TREATMENT PLANT Proposed Site Plan - Aerial View From Southeast FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 12W 6 9 TH S T R E E T VALLEY VIE W R O A D RETAIL / RESTAURANT NEW OFFICE PUBLIC SAFETY PARKING EXISTING OFFICE EXISTING OFFICE RESIDENTIAL PARKING PARKING MEDICAL OFFICE Proposed Site Plan - Aerial View From N orthwest FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 13 Building Height • Recognize this is a transition zone • Northern gateway to France Ave corridor can incorporate some height • Taller buildings on France Ave side of site • Shadow study will be conducted once plans are finalized • Strategies to soften northern and western edges • Bio-filtration • Recreational landscaping • 50’+ setbacks Building Height FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 14 FRANCE A V E N U E W 66 T H S T R E E T W 69TH STREETVALLEY VIE W R O A D 7 STORIES - 105’ 5 DECKS - 42’ 4 STORIES - 70’ 2 STORIES - 34’1 STORY - 24’ 1 STORY - 24’ 10 STORIES - 164’ 6 STORIES - 88’ 2 STORIES - 30’ 5 DECKS - 42’ 13 STORIES - 146’ 4 DECKS - 32’ 6 STORIES - 67’ Proposed Site Plan - Building Heights FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 15 Proposed Site Plan - Building Heights & Elevations 0’ 50’ 100’ 200’400’ FRANCE AVENUE W 66TH STREETW 69TH STREETVALLEY VIEW ROA D 907’ 945’ 875’ 1021’ 870’ 902’ 917’ 875’ 870’ 912’ 878’ 902’904’ 871’ 978’ 978’ 875’871’905’ 880’ 903’ 872’ 870’ 912’ 880’ 1044’ 880’ 898’898’ 865’ 867’866’ 954’ 891’ 903’ 896’ 942’ 876’ 32’ 70’ 32’ 42’ 42’ 24’24’ 107’ 103’ 34’ 42’ 164’ 88’ 30’ 146’ 67’ 5 DECKS 7 STORIES 1 STORY 1 STORY 2 STORIES 4 STORIES 5 DECKS 10 STORIES 6 STORIES 13 STORIES 4 DECKS 2 STORIES FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 16 Proposed Site Plan - View From Rosland Park FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 17 Green Space/Pervious Surfaces • INCREASE green space and pervious surface • Green space attractive and usable (walking, sitting, shade, outdoor gathering) • Healthy rejuvenation of the existing mature landscape • Stormwater management on-site and capacity to help off-site • Replace 1,500+ surface parking stalls with a mix of uses, amenities, and green space • Ability to create 50’+ boulevards/setbacks/buffers along all property edges • Use grade and landscaping to screen structures G reen Space/Pervious Surfaces FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 18 0’ 50’ 100’ 200’400’ FRANCE AVENUE W 66TH STREETW 69TH STREETVALLEY VIEW ROA D Pervious Surface Impervious Surface EXISTING 258,915 SF (5.94 Acres) = of Site Area 686,905 SF (15.767 Acres) = of Site NEW 263,797 SF (6.06 Acres) = of Site Area 682,023 SF (15.66 Acres) = of Site Area Proposed Site Plan - Pervious & Im pervious Surfaces FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 19 Stormwater Management • Existing stormwater system was not designed with controls • Proposed stormwater management system will be design to meet the City of Edina and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District requirements • No increase in runoff rates • Volume reduction of 1.1” over the impervious surface • Water quality improvements • Flood storage • Combination of surface ponds and underground tanks • Improved flood storage on site to reduce flooding in Valley View Storm water M anagem ent FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 20 0’ 50’ 100’ 200’400’ FRANCE AVENUE W 66TH STREETW 69TH STREETVALLEY VIEW ROA D INFILTRATION BASINS FLOOD STORAGE RAINGARDENS Proposed Site Plan - Storm water M anagem ent FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 21 Transition Zone • Transition height and density from east to the west • Focus new height added along France Ave • Lower scale along Valley View Road • Incorporate a mix of uses to benefit both site users and neighbors Transition Zone FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 22 CORNELIA NEIGHBORHOOD VALLEY VIEW GREENWAY 50’ Minimum Width CENTRAL PARKING 0’ 50’ 100’ 200’400’ FRANCE AVENUE W 66TH STREETW 69TH STREETVALLEY VIEW ROAD Proposed Site Plan - Transition to C ornelia N eighborhood FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 23 Proposed Site Plan - View From Valley View G reenway FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 24 FRANCE AVENUE W 66TH STREETW 69TH STREETVALLEY VIEW ROA D CORNELIA NEIGHBORHOOD 1 2 3 * ALL VIEWS TAKEN FROM 5’ ABOVE MARKED ELEVATION TO REPLICATE EYE LEVEL 0’ 50’ 100’ 200’400’ 869’ * 868’ * 876’ * C ornelia Viewshed Locations FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 25 C ornelia Viewshed | 1 - South Residence FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 26 C ornelia Viewshed | 2 - Valley View & 68th FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 27 C ornelia Viewshed | 3 - N orth Residence FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 28 Traffic • No traffic study yet but will be an important step in City review process • In 2016/17 plan, no significant changes to roads or intersections recommended • Internal engineering analysis suggests a similar outcome for this concept • Neighbors have offered they do not want 68th Street access closed off at Valley View • (We’ve never suggested this as an option) • Removing 2 office buildings and one restaurant will offset some of the new uses • No additional curb cuts to France, Valley View or 66th; one relocated on VV Rd to improve alignment • City considering lane adjustments to Valley View Rd • Not currently in the 5-year CIP • A project north of 66th Street in 2024 if MnDOT replaces the Highway 62 bridge • IF that occurs, City MAY look at options to continue the project down VVRD to France • Funding uncertain • Positioning of buildings and parking will balance traffic between Valley View and France • Directing traffic through Lake Cornelia neighborhood is NOT a project objective Traffic FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 29 0’ 50’ 100’ 200’400’ FRANCE AVENUE W 66TH STREETW 69TH STREETVALLEY VIEW ROA D PRIMARY PARKING STRUCTURE ACCESS PRIMARY VEHICULAR CIRCULATION Proposed Site Plan - Vehicular C irculation FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 30 Proposed Site Plan - Aerial View of C entral Boulevard FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 31 Parking • The biggest challenge from Day 1 of the project! • Find a market viable, cost effective, sustainable parking solution • Replace 1,500+ surface parking stalls with consolidated, structured parking • Allow more uses, amenities, and green space on the site • Existing 6600 & 6800 buildings require over 1,000 stalls – approx. 5-6 levels of parking • High water table limits amount of parking that can be built below grade • Mixture of parking solutions: executive below building, surface, and ramp • Screening for parking ramps: topography of site, trees & plantings, and facade materials • Setbacks and scale of ramps to improve pedestrian experience • Public use of parking for events at Rosland Park Parking FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 32 Parking Structure Precedent Im agery FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 33 2019 Greater Southdale Design Experience Guidelines Key Objectives • Being a Connector to the Greater Community • Commercial Amenity-Focused Streets • All Buildings to be at Least 50’ Back From Property Line with Robust Landscape • Breaking Down Scale of Super Blocks Into Human-Scaled Connections • New Pedestrian Walkway & Circulation Options, Some in the Form of Linear Parks EDINA HRAHENNEPINCOUNTY SOUTHDALE LIBRARY SITE : REVISED SITE CONCEPT WORKSHOP February 9, 2017 build upon existing assets SOURCE: RE-VISIONING THE SOUTHDALE DISTRICTARCHITECTURE FIELD OFFICE EDINA HRAHENNEPINCOUNTY SOUTHDALE LIBRARY SITE : REVISED SITE CONCEPT WORKSHOP February 9, 2017 walkable Image source: http://www.pearldistrictproperties.com/pearl-district-pearl-block-2-townhomes.html SOURCE: RE-VISIONING THE SOUTHDALE DISTRICTARCHITECTURE FIELD OFFICE EDINA HRAHENNEPINCOUNTY SOUTHDALE LIBRARY SITE : REVISED SITE CONCEPT WORKSHOP February 9, 2017 mixed-use Image source: http://seattle.curbed.com/2016/3/1/11137608/vulcan-sells-south-lake-unions-2200-westlake-complex-for-65m SOURCE: RE-VISIONING THE SOUTHDALE DISTRICTARCHITECTURE FIELD OFFICE EDINA HRAHENNEPINCOUNTY SOUTHDALE LIBRARY SITE : REVISED SITE CONCEPT WORKSHOP February 9, 2017 sustainable http://www.boredpanda.com/green-roof-solar-school-nyc/ EDINA HRAHENNEPINCOUNTY SOUTHDALE LIBRARY SITE : REVISED SITE CONCEPT WORKSHOP February 9, 2017 human-scaled Image source: www.upstairsbethesda.com SOURCE: RE-VISIONING THE SOUTHDALE DISTRICTARCHITECTURE FIELD OFFICE green Southdale D esign G uidelines FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 34 0’ 50’ 100’ 200’400’ FRANCE AVENUE W 66TH STREETW 69TH STREETVALLEY VIEW ROA D Proposed Site Plan - Pedestrian Experience FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 35 Proposed Site Plan - View From Prom enade on France FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 36 Light Pollution • Concept level plan doesn’t yet have lighting types and locations • Upgrade/improve the current site lighting • Design to balance lighting for safety and security on the site with impact off-site • Mindful of lighting impact on POF and Lake Cornelia neighborhood Light Pollution FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 37 Light Pollution C ontrol Strategies FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 38 Noise • Still primarily an office/employment center, operations during typical business hours • Dining and service retail in evenings and weekends along France Ave • Same location planned for service and delivery for the office buildings • Fire Station along Valley View Rd. Possible siren restrictions N oise FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 07.29.2020 39 Uses • Remove two buildings, 85k SF office • Remove existing Tavern on France facility • Remove vast majority of existing 1,500+ surface parking stalls • Introduce: • 275k SF of Class A office and amenity space • 85k SF of modern medical office • 210 apartments • 25k SF of dining and service retail • Plazas, walking paths, outdoor gathering areas • Municipal water treatment plant • Public safety and emergency vehicle station • Parking to support these uses Uses FRANCEon C ity O f Edina Sketch Plan Subm ission | 08.04.2020 FRANCE A V E N U E W 66 T H S T R E E T W 69TH STREETVALLEY VIE W R O A D 163,000 RSF 171,580 GSF 1,020 Stalls 84,000 RSF 88,420 GSF 20,000 RSF 21,050 GSF 12,000 RSF 12,630 GSF 10,000 RSF 10,525 GSF 283,000 RSF 297,895 GSF 198,000 RSF 208,420 GSF 14,000 RSF 14,735 GSF 497 Stalls 243,600 RSF 256,420 GSF 650 Stalls FAR CALCULATION Total Site Area 945,820 SF Building Area (GSF) 1,081,684 SF Total FAR 1.14 PARKING Structured 2,167 Existing Below Building 92 New Below Building 394 Surface 280 Total Parking 2,933 Proposed Site Plan - Building Area DATE: August 5, 2020 TO: 6600 France Avenue / Avenue on France - Owner and Development Team CC: Cary Teague – Community Development Director FROM: Chad Millner P.E. - Director of Engineering RE: 6600 France Avenue – Development Review, Water Plant Concept Only The Engineering Department has reviewed the sketch plan materials dated 7/29/2020 in regard to the Water Treatment Plant Concept. The sketch has shown a possible location for Water Treatment Plant (WTP) #5 on the south end of the property integrated with the south parking ramp. The WTP is shown adjacent to the Bank of America ATM drive-thru. In concept this location could work with the City’s water distribution system. For a successful integration into the water distribution system, the following needs to be considered. 1) Donation of land for WTP and located to accommodate: a. Facility Size - working square footage b. 2-3 stories above grade maybe 1 below c. Located with no risk of flooding d. If integrated into parking structure, the treatment plant could: i. Be within the footprint of the parking structure with City access from within the structure or within the site; or ii. Free standing building right next to a parking structure with City access from within the structure or within the site e. City facility/parcel to be integrated into overall site design (water, utilities, traffic, landscaping, parking, etc) f. Developer to deliver construction ready pad or shell and structure if integrated with parking structure g. Developer to hire engineer to design pad or parking structure; with input from City Engineer to ensure compatibility h. Developer to fund concept and preliminary plans for zoning consideration i. City to fund design and construction of water treatment plant j. Easement to include access over and through the site to accommodate construction and future operations at no cost k. Easement also required through portions of site to accommodate raw water pipe as well as distribution pipes at no cost l. Both parties have approval rights regarding location and shape of parcel m. Developer has rights to provide reasonable input on design of future City facility Date: August 6, 2020 To: Cary Teague, Community Development Director From: Tom M. Schmitz, Fire Chief Subject: Letter of Support for Fire Station 2 at the proposed 6600 – 6800 France Avenue Redevelopment Site In concept, I am in support of including a fire station in the proposed onFrance plans dated July 29, 2020. In 2018, the department hired Five Bugles Design to conduct a response time and station location study. One of the questions was whether our current fire station at 7335 York Avenue South was best positioned for current and future operations. The final report suggested a new station would best serve the community if it were north and to the west of the existing site. This new station should remain south of Hwy 62 along the France Avenue corridor. The onFrance location could be an ideal site that would improve our response times to the west and north without significantly changing our current response times in the southeast quadrant of the city. The report goes on to recommend the optimal fire station would be of such size to accommodate a 24-hour fire station operating two ALS ambulances and one fire apparatus. The plans do not get into any detail on actual fire station size or design. The proposed fire station on the plan is in a good location with access onto Valley View Road. It is set back enough from the north intersection of 66th Street and Valley View Road and the south intersection of Valley View and France Avenue. This would allow our vehicles an opportunity to clear the roadway as we approach the intersections. Obviously, further detail is needed to determine if this site is ideal for the fire department and the community. Thank you to Southdale Office Partners, LLC and its project team in their consideration and inclusion on their redevelopment proposal at 6600 – 6800 France Avenue South. 2200 Zane Ave N | Minneapolis, MN 55422 www.archfieldoffice.com Cary: At your request, we reviewed the Sketch Plan submission for the redevelopment of the current Southdale Office Center at 6600-6800 France Avenue based on our nearly 4 years’ experience working with the Greater Southdale Work Group to craft a physical vision for the future district, translating their guiding principles to the built environment. The resulting vision for development in the Greater Southdale District is to create an enhanced human experience along existing major and new connector streets, with overall experience shaped via landscape setbacks, building step backs, a hierarchy of street typologies, transparency at street level, a minimized impact of the car, and managing storm water as an amenity. The outcome of our collaborations with the Work Group is described in the urban design chapter of the Greater Southdale District Plan and resulted in the Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines. The Sketch Plan review is an important milestone in the development process to assess a project’s overall conformance with the District Plan, the Design Experience Guidelines, and the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The intent is that it be a collaborative process, whereby the development team comes to the review with ideas, challenges, and design sketches with the intent of merging the goals of the District and Experience Guidelines with development goals and financial considerations into a comprehensive vision for the proposed site. The process further intends to open minds to innovative thinking, social responsibility, and reinforcing community structure to create a more resilient future. The site of the proposed development is a pivotal, large-scale parcel within the Greater Southdale District. It serves multiple roles: gateway to the District, transition to the Cornelia neighborhood, northern terminus of the proposed West Promenade, and the northern edge of the new street room along France Avenue. At nearly 22 acres, it offers great potential to exemplify and positively contribute to the broader community goal of a walkable, resilient, human-centric district. The Greater Southdale District Plan and Design Experience Guidelines address fundamental ideas about how building scale and location, block size, and street width come together to shape public realm and overall human experience. Through the development of the guidelines, we applied measurements to each of these components that are essential to shaping the future form and character of the district. We understand there are many ways this can be accomplished. However, the proposal for the site at 6600-6800 France that is being offered to the City is counter to those guidelines in many important categories: the location of buildings and their relationship to the street, the visibility of infrastructure and amount of the site dedicated to car To City of Edina Cary Teague, Community Development Director 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 From Mic Johnson, FAIA Date August 4, 2020 2 storage; the lack of attention paid to transition zones; the scale/massing of buildings that exceed 200 feet in length; and proposed connections and public realm improvements. When taken together, their broader impact on the individual and community experience is not in alignment with the Greater Southdale District vision of a public realm experience that catalyzes an active community-based approach to both development and daily life. In particular, we note: Multi-level parking structures face the community/public realm and are not lined. Per page 15 of the Design Experience Guidelines, “above-grade parking structures should be lined with programmable public realm space.” Parking structures have primary access from streets within the Superblock rather than a centralized access point off of the perimeter roads. Primary vehicular circulation cuts through the central spine of the site. The inclusion of surface parking, particularly surface parking along perimeter streets. Pedestrian (primary) public realm is not connected to District assets. The proposal does not emphasize France Avenue as a major artery and connector, but rather is inward facing to the detriment of the overall goals of an interconnected district. In addition, there is no direct connection to the new north-south West Promenade, which is envisioned as a woonerf that puts pedestrians first, bikes second and cars last. New office building is located in the center of the site rather than along France to support the public realm development and the France Avenue street room. This could enable a potential extension of the West Promenade through the site, allowing for one level of below grade parking connecting all existing and new buildings within the development, accessed off of Valley View Road with drop-off at the West Promenade level. The proposal does not consider the importance of pedestrian east/west streets, a primary purpose of which are increase connectivity of residents in the single family neighborhoods to flow through the site to other destinations within the district. They should be inviting and comfortable, residential in nature, with a character that makes them special and connective. One story retail along France Avenue is unsustainable and does not meet the goals of a mixed-use district, nor does it provide flexibility long-term. Lack of mixed-use buildings to support the integration of office, retail, residential within the district with flexibility at the ground plane to support a variety of district and neighborhood needs. Lack of definable outdoor places that can be used for programmed activities for tenants, residents and the community alike. These are generators of both social and cultural activity for people within the public realm. The typologies set forth in the Design Experience Guidelines have not been cited as to their application to specific buildings and uses, and appear to have been ignored as a fundamental organizing strategy for the development of the site With that in mind, we offer the following comments on the proposal for consideration by the development and design team, as well as the Planning Commission and City staff with the goal of better aligning the plan with the intent of the Design Experience Guidelines and overall vision for the District. Transition Zones During our involvement with the Work Group, respect for the existing neighborhoods that surround the Greater Southdale District was the focus of many conversations and a driver in our design thinking—resulting 3 in the establishment of dedicated Transition Zones. As stated on page 17 of the Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines, “new development within transition zones is expected to balance scale and building use between these single family neighborhoods and the higher density, more commercially focused Greater Southdale District.” The entire west side of the Southdale Office Center parcel lies within a Transition Zone, with the current plan showing three multi-level parking structures along that edge. The purpose of these transition zones is not to create a wall, as proposed in the current development plan – but rather, to respond to and respect the context of the adjacent single family neighborhoods, integrating between these residential neighborhoods with new housing more in scale with single family residences, such as two-and three-story townhomes transitioning to taller residential or mixed-use buildings. The zone is intended to be beneficial to both places, creating opportunity for shared commercial areas, landscape connections that enliven street life, and a building scale that literally transitions from one-or-two story single family homes to a higher density context. No matter how well bermed, landscaped, or nicely screened the walls are, structured parking immediately abutting a residential neighborhood or a parkway context is not in alignment with the Experience Guidelines. In addition, parking structures will need to be lined with program space (townhomes, office, etc.) or located underground or within buildings to meet the goals of the Experience Guidelines. Building Scale and Experience The future of the Greater Southdale District is envisioned to offer a vibrant mix of uses, supported by flexible buildings that can evolve over time. This transformation requires a greater focus on eliminating parking lots, and creating below-grade and hidden parking for residents, employees, visitors and customers. It incorporates smaller building blocks that are nominally 200’x200’ with buildings that have consistent 60-foot- tall podium bases, with the potential of taller building components stepping back from the street, in deference to the pedestrian experience. The ground floor of buildings is to be 20’ floor-to-floor to allow for future flexibility, with 75% transparency at street level. Using these principles as a baseline, a hierarchy of street typologies serves as an organizing direction for architectural planning and design within the district. In this proposal, certain building heights along France, two of which are at 24 feet, do not align with the overall vision for the development of the district, nor do they support the creation of an enlivened street room experience. None of the street typologies set forth in the Design Experience Guidelines calls for one-story stand-alone retail buildings—especially on larger parcels that are part of the “Boulevards” typology, such as the north end of the west side of France Avenue. Street Rooms The existing extended breaks in the street wall in the form of surface parking lots and standalone one-and two-story buildings set back several hundred feet contribute to the negative pedestrian experience that currently exists along France. To mitigate that condition, the Design Experience Guidelines call for a contiguous podium/ground floor plane as an essential component in creating a street room that promotes a more active urban experience along France. In this proposal, 60-70% of the site along France is devoted to car circulation, surface parking, and one-story retail – which do not positively contribute to the development of the desired street room experience. Site Organization and Connections The goal of the roughly 200’x 200’ block outlined in the Experience Guidelines is to set the stage for a building scale that positively impacts human experience in the public realm: 4 o Promoting connections to adjacent properties and buildings, as well as connections through larger site (superblocks). o Allowing more variety in architectural expression and ultimately, the creation of more diverse places. o Limiting the length of building facades. o Offering shorter walking distances between blocks. o Creating a variety of street experiences. o Supporting greater density. o Minimizing the impact of the car. While the proposal does divide the site into nominally smaller parcels and reduce the amount of existing surface parking from what exists today, its overall organization is not significantly different than traditional suburban office park developments and is not in keeping with the vision for the future evolution of the Greater Southdale District. The intention in the experience guidelines is to create an active network of streets that accommodate pedestrians, bikes, transit and cars; peds and bikes; or pedestrians only. In this proposal, the lack of connection and definition of interior streets within the superblock framework does not meet the intention of the guidelines. As noted above, this is an important site within the district because it has all of the components found in numerous smaller parcels—namely, a gateway location, a relationship to France Avenue, adjacency to important districtwide amenities, and a mix of program uses—and is distinguished via its size and catalytic potential. It is also an important site in the development of the guidelines because of its relationship and proximity to the Cornelia neighborhood. The redevelopment of the site at 6600-6800 France is a tremendous opportunity for the City of Edina, the development team, and community stakeholders to create a forward-thinking model of development based on human experience while building upon and improving the assets that already exist on the site. The proposed site is part of a larger context of places within the District. When considering new buildings along France Avenue, we must imagine the whole length of France, and how each building will fit in and extend the shared vision that will make it a great street. This holistic mindset must be apply to every existing and new street within the District. We believe there are many opportunities for the design submitted as part of the sketch plan review process to evolve to better align with and support the broader vision for the future Greater Southdale District. Thank you for the opportunity to review. Please let me know if you have any questions. Mic DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. The Avenue on France 6600 France Avenue S Edina, MN 55435 City of Edina - Final Rezoning Submittal Phase II-A & II-B 04.12.2017 The Avenue on FranceDJRARCHITECTURE INC. 12 The Avenue on France 6600 France Avenue South Edina, Minnesota Southwest View from 66th and France DJRARCHITECTURE INC. The Avenue on France13 Masterplan - The Avenue on France This Masterplan shows new construction of a Medical Office Building, (3) Retail Buildings, Residential, Hotel and Office that will replace (2) 3-story office buildings in the middle of the site that are not compliant with current ADA standards. The Masterplan also shows new construction of (3) areas of underground parking to meet the needs of the site and reduce the amount of surface parking on the site. N BANK OF AMERICA 1F 7,190 SF Under Permit RETAIL II-A 2F 25,748 SF EX. 6800 OFFICE 7F To Remain TAVERN ON FRANCE 1F To Remain OFFICE 6F 116,000 SF EX. 6600 OFFICE 6F To Remain RETAIL II-B 2F 23,093 SF MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING 6F 155,000 SF RESIDENTIAL 8F 105,280 SF 70 Units RETAIL 1F 6,500 SF HOTEL 4F 72,350 SF 100 Rooms Site Data:Area Table: Phase I Phase II-A Phase II-B Phase III Phase IV Phase IV Phase V Phase VI Existing Existing Existing Allowable Actual Notes BOA Retail Retail MOB Office Hotel Residential Retail Total (New) 6600 6800 Tavern Total (Existing) Total (Site) Site Area:n/a 948,632 SF 21.78 acres L8 13,160 FAR:0.5 (474,316 GSF).92 (880,979 GSF)377,008 SF Existing/ 503,971 SF New L7 13,160 Height:48'-0"85'-0"HOD-4 Height Zone L6 25,000 20,000 13,160Lot Coverage:30%24.2% est.229,598 SF Subject to Survey L5 25,000 20,000 13,160 L4 25,000 20,000 17,950 13,160 L3 25,000 20,000 17,950 13,160 L2 7,003 6225 25,000 20,000 17,950 13,160L17,190 18,745 16,868 30,000 16,000 18,500 13,160 6,500 Total 7,190 25,748 23,093 155,000 116,000 72,350 105,280 6,500 503,971 SF NEW 198,763 163,855 7200 377,008 SF Ex. 880,979 SF Parking Summary: Surface to Remain Required (New)Basis of Calculation EMC Sec. 36-1311 New Parking Provided Total Parking Res. 2015-113 Total ParkingOffice4881084 271,000 SF of New Office 450 underground (North)(Per Count)(Varience) (Per code)Hotel 125 100 Room Hotel (est.)450 underground (Middle) Residential 123 70 units per EMC Sec. 36-1311 (w)400 underground (South) Retail 284 55,341 SF of New Retail 99 underground (Phase II)157 Total 488 2394 New Stalls To be provided by underground parking 1399 underground 1887 Stalls 157 Stalls 2044 Stalls Site Data:Area Table: Phase I Phase II-A Phase II-B Phase III Phase IV Phase IV Phase V Phase VI Existing Existing Existing Allowable Actual Notes BOA Retail Retail MOB Office Hotel Residential Retail Total (New) 6600 6800 Tavern Total (Existing) Total (Site)Site Area:n/a 948,632 SF 21.78 acres L8 13,160 FAR:0.5 (474,316 GSF).92 (880,979 GSF)377,008 SF Existing/ 503,971 SF New L7 13,160 Height:48'-0"85'-0"HOD-4 Height Zone L6 25,000 20,000 13,160 Lot Coverage:30%24.2% est.229,598 SF Subject to Survey L5 25,000 20,000 13,160 L4 25,000 20,000 17,950 13,160L325,000 20,000 17,950 13,160 L2 7,003 6225 25,000 20,000 17,950 13,160 L1 7,190 18,745 16,868 30,000 16,000 18,500 13,160 6,500 Total 7,190 25,748 23,093 155,000 116,000 72,350 105,280 6,500 503,971 SF NEW 198,763 163,855 7200 377,008 SF Ex. 880,979 SF Parking Summary: Surface to Remain Required (New)Basis of Calculation EMC Sec. 36-1311 New Parking Provided Total Parking Res. 2015-113 Total Parking Office 488 1084 271,000 SF of New Office 450 underground (North)(Per Count)(Varience) (Per code) Hotel 125 100 Room Hotel (est.)450 underground (Middle)Residential 123 70 units per EMC Sec. 36-1311 (w)400 underground (South)Retail 284 55,341 SF of New Retail 99 underground (Phase II)157 Total 488 2394 New Stalls To be provided by underground parking 1399 underground 1887 Stalls 157 Stalls 2044 Stalls Site Data:Area Table: Phase I Phase II-A Phase II-B Phase III Phase IV Phase IV Phase V Phase VI Existing Existing Existing Allowable Actual Notes BOA Retail Retail MOB Office Hotel Residential Retail Total (New) 6600 6800 Tavern Total (Existing) Total (Site) Site Area:n/a 948,632 SF 21.78 acres L8 13,160 FAR:0.5 (474,316 GSF).92 (880,979 GSF)377,008 SF Existing/ 503,971 SF New L7 13,160Height:48'-0"85'-0"HOD-4 Height Zone L6 25,000 20,000 13,160 Lot Coverage:30%24.2% est.229,598 SF Subject to Survey L5 25,000 20,000 13,160 L4 25,000 20,000 17,950 13,160 L3 25,000 20,000 17,950 13,160 L2 7,003 6225 25,000 20,000 17,950 13,160L17,190 18,745 16,868 30,000 16,000 18,500 13,160 6,500 Total 7,190 25,748 23,093 155,000 116,000 72,350 105,280 6,500 503,971 SF NEW 198,763 163,855 7200 377,008 SF Ex. 880,979 SF Parking Summary: Surface to Remain Required (New)Basis of Calculation EMC Sec. 36-1311 New Parking Provided Total Parking Res. 2015-113 Total ParkingOffice4881084 271,000 SF of New Office 450 underground (North)(Per Count)(Varience) (Per code) Hotel 125 100 Room Hotel (est.)450 underground (Middle) Residential 123 70 units per EMC Sec. 36-1311 (w)400 underground (South)Retail 284 55,341 SF of New Retail 99 underground (Phase II)157 Total 488 1616 New Stalls To be provided by underground parking 1399 underground 1887 Stalls 157 Stalls 2044 Stalls The Avenue on FranceDJRARCHITECTURE INC. 14 The Avenue on France 6600 France Avenue South Edina, Minnesota Aerial View from W 69th Street and France Avenue Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 8 c 180,000 200,000 180,000 200,000 Existing Sites: The criteria for buildings sites: Large parking area serving 1 story building Sites that are critical to the overall success of development in the district Important connections that would extend the public realm assets such as the Promenade Under utilized land that can be repurposed to serve the public realm goals of the district : Potential Building Sites This diagram illustrates those parcels within the Greater Southdale Area and adjacent Pentagon Park that are potential redevelopment opportunities. Criteria to measure the opportunity inherent in these sites include: • Sites that currently have large, dominating surface parking lots. • Sites that are critical to the overall success of development in the district. • Important connections that would extend existing public realm assets such as the Promenade. • Underutilized land that can be repurposed to serve the public realm goals of the district. NPARKLAWN AVE.76TH STREETMINNESOTA DR.GALLAGHER DR.72ND STREETHAZELTON RD.70TH STREET69TH STREET66TH STREET65TH STREETFRANCE AVE. YORK AVE. VALLEY VIEW RD. BARRIE RD. XERXES AVE. EDINBOROUGH WAY77TH STREET78TH STREET Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 9 Potential Building Sites The diagram at right illustrates how the basic principle of a 200’ x 200’ grid can be applied nominally on potential redevelopment sites throughout the district without consideration of property line. It is recognized that land ownership will influence the ultimate form of the grid. Other considerations influencing block pattern: • Building scale • Public realm connections • Connections through blocks • Pedestrian-oriented street intersections The Space Between Buildings As a result of the 200’ x 200’ block pattern, the space between buildings becomes an important asset in shaping the overall sense of landscape and continuity of public realm throughout the district. Because the superblocks have primary responsibility for serving the vehicular traffic needs of the district, access to the smaller blocks for drop-off, service and parking can be planned to stay at the perimeter of a block, allowing for the spaces between the remaining block to be used for a network of green spaces that support the health and wellbeing of the community. c 180,000 200,000 180,000 200,000 v The Space between Buildings: As a result of the 200x200 foot block pattern is the space between building that becomes an important asset to the overall sense of landscape throughout the district. Because the super blocks have primary responsibility for the larger traffic needs of the district, access to the smaller blocks for drop off, service and parking can be planned to stay at the perimeter allowing the spaces between the remaining block to used for pocket parks, gardens, play areas and many other activities that support the health and well being of the community. The “space between” Buildings –as places and connections to larger community pathways ParksPocket parksRecreationPlay areasGardensStorm water managementWet landsWater ways : Opportunities for the “Space Between” buildings to become places and connections to larger community pathways: • Parks • Pocket Parks • Recreation • Play Areas • Gardens • Stormwater Management • Wetlands • Waterways c 180,000 200,000 180,000 200,000 v Block Pattern: The basic principal of a 200’X200’ grid was applied nominally throughout the district without consideration of property line. It is recognized that land owner ship will influence the ultimate form of the grid. Considerations: building scale public realm connections through block connections Pedestrian oriented street intersections (see intersection diagram) : N N Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 18 STREET ROOM TYPOLOGIES A hierarchy of streets and pathways within the district is the framework for public realm development and related building form. Each street across the district has a role in how it serves pedestrians, bicycles and vehicles in connecting sub-districts, adjacent single family neighborhoods, and the overall Greater Southdale District and creating a unified sense of place. It is the intent that street typologies define the public realm experience: the space between buildings, dimensions of building setbacks from the street, heights of facades at the building face at the street and building step backs, where the façade of the building steps back from the volume of the street room. Street Room Typology 1: Promenades and Transition Zones Promenades are new woonerf-type streets on the west side of France Avenue and on the east side of York Avenue. Within this typology, there are several different variations for new building development in these important transition zones, responding to and respecting the context of adjacent single family neighborhoods. Street Room Typology 2: Cornelia Overlay Zone With the understanding that there is special sensitivity related to new building development near the Cornelia neighborhood, this is a special zone governing the design of the public realm/street room on the east side of France Avenue between the north side of 69th Street and Gallagher Drive. Buildings within this zone will be expected to maintain the east side of the France Avenue street room, but will be of a lower overall scale than new Transition Zones 1A West Promenade 1B West Promenade (South) 1C East Promenade 2 Cornelia Overlay 3 New Local Streets 4 Primary East-West Streets 5 Boulevards 6 Central Promenade Spine 66TH STREETVALLEY VIEW RD.66TH STREET69TH STREET70TH STREETHAZELTON RD.GALLAGHER DRPARKLAWN AVE76TH STREET77TH STREETMINNESOTA DR72ND STREETEDINBOROUGH WAY YORK AVENUE FRANCE AVENUE XERXES AVENUE BARRIE RD78TH STREETN Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 19 buildings at the north or south ends of France. Street Room Typology 3: New Local Streets These are new 60’ wide streets internal to existing superblocks. These streets will be constructed as new buildings are added to the district, and will help create the new network of streets and pedestrian pathways throughout the Greater Southdale District. Some of these spaces between buildings may become parks or plazas, extending the public realm. Others will become primary vehicular access for drop off and pick up, as well as access to parking and primary building services. Street Room Typology 4: Primary East-West Streets The existing 69th Street, 70th Street, Hazelton Road, Parklawn Avenue and West 76th Street are important connections through the district from east to west. This typology is intended to respect the neighborhood scale and context in a meaningful way, with an ample tree canopy, extensive setbacks and lower scale buildings at the face of the public realm. By employing these characteristics, the landscape experience of the single family residential neighborhoods is extended through the Greater Southdale District. Street Room Typology 5: The Boulevards France Avenue, York Avenue, West 66th Street and West 77th Street are the district’s gateway streets. They carry the highest traffic volumes and are intended to have higher transit volumes than any other streets within the district. These streets will have the greatest impact in conveying the overall identity of the district: a consistent 50 foot setback with a double row of trees will extend the length of these streets, while consistency in building heights along the street edge will form the edge of the street room—bridging between the lower intensity and transitional areas and the higher intensity zones within the Greater Southdale District. Street Room Typology 6: Central Spine The Central Spine comprises the existing Promenade, its potential expansion northward, and future connections to the west to Fred Richards Park. This important pedestrian network is an attractive destination for both residents and visitors alike. New development along the spine must respond to and respect this important public amenity. Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 20 The sub-district to the west side of France between 69th and Parklawn is a unique transition zone within the Greater Southdale District. Any proposed developments within this zone should be approached with special sensitivity. This means that the street experience within that zone should be perceived as connected to the Cornelia neighborhood through landscaping and trees, and buildings that gradually transition in both height and function and use between lower intensity neighborhoods to the more commercially-focused district on the east side of France Avenue. The West Promenade, a new north-south pedestrian, bike and vehicle street/woonerf that accommodates service access, is envisioned between France Avenue and the Cornelia neighborhood. This new shared street is intended to provide service access to new developments along France (keeping vehicular traffic out of single family neighborhoods), and providing a new framework to support the transition from townhouses and lower-scale residential buildings on the west side of the West Promenade, to slightly taller buildings on the east side of the West Promenade. Street Room Typology 1A West Promenade / Transition to Cornelia Neighborhood Transition Zones 1A West Promenade 1B West Promenade (South) 1C East Promenade 2 Cornelia Overlay 3 New Local Streets 4 Primary East-West Streets 5 Boulevards 6Central Promenade Spine NPARKLAWN AVE.76TH STREETMINNESOTA DR.GALLAGHER DR.72ND STREETHAZELTON RD.70TH STREET69TH STREET66TH STREET65TH STREETFRANCE AVE. YORK AVE. VALLEY VIEW RD. BARRIE RD. XERXES AVE. EDINBOROUGH WAY77TH STREET78TH STREET Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: X.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Jennifer Garske, Executive Assistant Item Activity: Subject:Correspondence Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Attached is correspondence received since the last City Council meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description Correspondence 8-18-20 City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Mayor & City Council Amir Missaghi 4235 Crocker Ave Edina MN 55416 6128050241 no dashes or spaces amirmissaghi@gmail.com Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Dear City Council Members, Edina has been ahead of the curve in recognizing the need for reform and accountability as relates to race, equity, and policing. And I thank the Council for their leadership and stewardship on this important topic. I ask that the Council maintain its momentum and seek the immediate completion of the specific line item in the Racial Equity Work Plan relating to “Evaluate feasibility and advisability of increasing the amount of police-community data collected by the City.” The most recent status reports to date have shown that this item has been delayed. Yet its completion is fundamental to having a baseline understanding of policing in Edina, especially as it relates to people of color in our community. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Best, Amir Missaghi Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png City of Edina Correspondence Submission If you are leaving comments for a public hearing being heard by Council or the Planning Commission, go to https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/public-hearings Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske, at JGarske@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Friday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Mayor & City Council JOSEPH GOLDBERG 5809 BROOKVIEW AVE MINNEAPOLIS Minnesota 55424 9528073189 no dashes or spaces jmgold47@msn.com Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. We live a couple of houses from the intersection of Brookview and 58th. The nearly endless construction project on 58th appears to be reaching its conclusion. Curbs are now in place, so residents can see what the width of 58th will be when the road surface is laid (perhaps in the coming week). It looks to be no wider than a country lane in rural England. How buses or garbage trucks (which both use 58th on a daily basis) will be able to pass each other safely is a total mystery. Hopefully bicycles will prohibited on 58th. If not, the first bicyclist injured or dead will be on the head of whomever planned the project. I can't believe that the street width is in compliance with whatever transportation safety guidelines apply, but if it is that does not change its violation of basic common sense. Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: XIII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Lisa A. Schaefer, Assistant City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Q2 Quarterly Business Reports Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: The 2020 Quarter 2 update for the Budget Work Plan is attached, as well as the Q2 Quarterly Finance Report and Q2 Race & Equity Work Plan. ATTACHMENTS: Description Q2 2020-2021 Budget Work Plan Q2 2020 Finance Report Q2 2020 Race & Equity Report Updated August 12, 2020 Page 1 of 10 2020 – 2021 Proposed Budget Work Plan DEFINITIONS Describes the broad outcomes that must be achieved through the budget. Defines the measurable results that need to be achieved to meet the goals. Details the specific actions to be taken this budget to meet the objectives. Goal 1: Maintain Physical Assets & Infrastructure It is crucial to maintain City infrastructure including streets, facilities, buildings, equipment and public spaces. Deferred maintenance can lead to costly unplanned repairs and replacements with decisions based on short-term implementation costs, vs. long-term maintenance costs. Properly maintained facilities, streets, water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems provide reliable and efficient operations while lessening the City’s carbon footprint. ONGOING OBJECTIVES: • Incorporate financial, societal and environmental costs into decision-making processes. • Incorporate lifecycle and maintenance costs and climate adaptation design practices to allow more informed decision making. Budget Goal Budget Objective Strategy/Action Updated August 12, 2020 Page 2 of 10 2020 – 2021 Proposed Budget Work Plan • Provide funding to maintain and replace City facilities, assets and equipment in a manner that avoids deferred maintenance, prevents emergency repair and replaces assets at the most cost- effective time. • Manage the City’s facilities, operations, equipment and capital investments in a manner that increases energy efficiency, reduces the City’s carbon footprint and GHG emissions and meets sustainability goals. • Design and build for resiliency in the infrastructure that reduces flooded structures, improves water quality (drinking and surface) and increases filtered drinking water production. 2020-2021 BUDGET OBJECTIVES • As debt levies expire, increase the CIP Levy to establish reliable funding for ongoing building maintenance, replacement and capital improvements. • Capture the Southdale TIF tax capacity for 2022 CIP. • Reduce the City operations’ total electricity GHG emissions by 5 percent, 893,000 kWh each year, through implementation of energy management plans, ongoing facility maintenance, capital improvements and operational behavior change. • Implement Green Fleet Policy recommendations to meet goal of 30 percent emission reduction mpg and gas usage by 2025. • Improve security and safety in City facilities for public and staff. 2020-2021 Strategy/Action: Dept Lead Quarterly Updates 1 Approve architectural option and complete construction of Water Plant #5. (Q4 2021) Engineering Q2—Waiting on developer at Avenue of France for a potential coop project. 2 Create a green building policy for City facilities incorporating sustainability principles into evaluation, design and construction of City capital projects. (Connected with project 3-2). Engineering Q2—On hold due to hiring freeze. 3 Determine interim park and recreational uses of Fred Richards Park. Update cost plan estimate prior to CIP process. (Q2 2020) Parks & Rec Q2—Master plan cost estimates updated for LOST proposal, uses identified but not implemented due to COVID-19 Pandemic. 4 Identify funding source and timeline for implementation for Braemar Park Master Plan by Q3 2020. Prioritize master plan components for future implementation. Ensure that master plan costing is updated prior to CIP process. (Q3 2020) Parks & Rec Q2—Master plan cost estimates updated for LOST proposal. 5 Consider options for using alternative funding methods for park improvements and determine next steps. (Q2 2020) Finance Q2—A bill was introduced at the Legislature allowing the Updated August 12, 2020 Page 3 of 10 2020 – 2021 Proposed Budget Work Plan City the opportunity to conduct a referendum creating a Local Option Sales Tax (LOST) to fund regional park improvements. The House Property and Local Tax Division’s bill effectively imposed a moratorium on new local sales taxes during the 2021 legislative session. It also creates a working group tasked to develop a list of capital projects that may qualify as projects of regional significance. This report is due by Nov. 1, 2021. 6 Develop a master plan for addressing City Hall deferred maintenance, energy efficiency, security and service needs in a cost-effective manner. (Q3 2020) Facilities Q2—Working with architect on final plan for security improvements, City Hall Master Plan in CIP for 2021, energy efficiencies plan scheduled for late 2020 / early 2021. 7 Implement decision (to be made in 2019) regarding street assessment financing and transition plan if applicable. If local option sales tax is selected, seek State legislative approval to request that voters approve a local option sales tax for regional park improvements and MSA street improvements. (Q2 2020 [state approval], Q4 2021 [referendum]) Finance Q2 – The Street Funding Task Force has been created and is meeting regularly. First presentation to the City Council on their work will be in November. Final report is due early 2021. 8 Approve a water quality strategy for Lake Cornelia. (Q2 2021) Engineering Q2—No update. 2021 goal. 9 Upgrade the communication equipment (SCADA) that monitors and ensures delivery of safe potable water and improve our ability to have a reliable storm and sanitary sewer system. (Q4 2020) Public Works Q2—In progress. Phase 1 of the project (replacement of the software and master server) was approved by the City Council in Q1. Work is underway. 10 Develop and begin implementation of the street lighting system and maintenance plan that balances sustainability, public safety, and quality of life goals, including increasing energy efficiency, ensuring safely lit community, and minimizing light pollution. (Q4 2020) Engineering Q2—ON HOLD due to budget adjustments made in response to COVID-19 Pandemic. Updated August 12, 2020 Page 4 of 10 2020 – 2021 Proposed Budget Work Plan 11 Prepare for possible conversion of Centennial Lakes from Enterprise fund to General fund in 2022-23 budget cycle. (Q2 2021) Finance Q2—No update. 2021 goal. Goal 2: Maintain Service Levels that Best Meet the Needs of the Community The City delivers a variety of services, including police and fire response, water and sewer, snow plowing and building inspections, that are essential for the safety and wellbeing of those who live, work or visit Edina. In addition, amenities and services including recreation facilities, parks and programs contribute to the overall quality of life within the community. To deliver reliable service, the City needs to recruit and retain a strong workforce that has the resources and technology needed to effectively and efficiently perform their work. ONGOING OBJECTIVES • Comply with legal and safety standards. • Maintain adequate response times. • Provide high-quality services in an efficient manner that demonstrates respect for the public. • Promote an engaging and respectful work culture that values employee quality of life and work/life balance. • Provide competitive employee compensation and benefits to attract and retain a skilled and high- performing workforce. • Provide staffing, tools, equipment, resources and training to meet expectations for service delivery. • Utilize effective technology to easily maintain and locate data for the public, reduce risk and provide better data for informed decision-making by elected officials and staff. • Ensure that limited resources (money, equipment and time) are deployed in an equitable and sustainable manner. 2020-2021 BUDGET OBJECTIVES • Increase integration of disparate City data systems, (e.g., Financial, Human Resources and Geographic Information Systems) for better decision-making and easier access. • Maintain adequate work-life balance for employees with an increased focus on employee quality of life, stress management, physical and mental well-being. Updated August 12, 2020 Page 5 of 10 2020 – 2021 Proposed Budget Work Plan • Provide adjustments to employee compensation to maintain position with market. • Provide benefit increases to and design changes to maintain affordability. 2020-2021 Strategy/Action: Dept Lead Quarterly Updates 1 Implement Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System, including: • Project hierarchy and metrics (Q4 2020) • “Go-live” new finance and HR software (Q1 2021) • Begin implementation of UB software (Q1 2021) • “Go-live” new UB system (Q3 2021) Finance Q2—Work continues on project implementation. Go- live still expected in Q1 2021. 2 Determine long-term plan for future of Art Center, including: ogram evaluation of community service needs for the Art Center. nsure critical repairs are made to Art Center to properly continue isting operations in current building for at least 10 years. • Conduct feasibility and infrastructure analysis on existing Art Center building prior to the CIP process. (Q2 2020) • Conduct alternative site analysis and business plan modeling for relocation of the Art Center operations. (Q2 2021) Parks & Recreation Q2—Completed infrastructure analysis and reviewing alternate site analysis locations. Determining business plan models. 3 Implement rental housing license and inspection program. (Q1 2020) Health COMPLETE. Rental Housing staff are in place and inspections have begun. 4 Implement Police-Worn Body Cameras. (Q4 2020) Police Q2—Policy has been developed and cameras have been ordered. On track for Q4 completion. 5 Replace Public Safety Computer-aided Dispatch (CAD) and Record Management System (RMS) (Q4 2020 research and select vendor; Q4 2021 to implement system) Police Q2—2020 is the year of researching and selecting a vendor. Have met with two potential vendors in Q1. No additional progress due to COVID-19 Pandemic. 6 Decision, finance method and plan for relocating OR expanding Fire Station 2 in order to accommodate 24-hour operations with one fire apparatus, two ambulances and support vehicle. (Q4 2020) Fire Q2—General discussion with Economic Development Manager on potential sites in Q1. Included some estimated costs for fire station in proposed CIP. No further progress due to COVID-19 Pandemic. Updated August 12, 2020 Page 6 of 10 2020 – 2021 Proposed Budget Work Plan 7 Determine finance method and plan for Fire Station 3 in the Northeast Quadrant of the City. This station would be of such size to accommodate 24-hour operations with one fire engine, ambulance and support vehicle. (Q4 2020) Fire Q2—General discussion with Economic Development Manager on potential sites in Q1. Included some estimated costs for fire station in proposed CIP. No further progress due to COVID-19 Pandemic. 8 Conduct first presidential primary under new state legislation. (Q1 2020) Administration COMPLETE. Voter turnout was 43 percent (6 percent for absentee voting). Turnout was 10 percent lower than estimated by Hennepin County and may have been impacted by the requirement for voters to select a party ballot. Staff is expecting $56,500 in reimbursements from the State. 9 Develop long-term plan for elections absentee voting and storage. (Q1 2020) Administration Q2—Absentee voting space secured with the help of Economic Development Manager. Remodeling space in fire station basement for storage was put on hold to focus on COVID-19 Pandemic. Goal 3: Plan for Connected & Sustainable Development Redevelopment and renewal of commercial and residential real estate is essential to the vibrancy of the community. Redevelopment will play an integral part of providing an inclusive, high quality of life that the Edina community expects. It is important to ensure plans and policies are relevant today and flexible for tomorrow. Incorporating sustainability principles and standards during redevelopment with the goal of reducing the community’s carbon footprint will be critical to human health and safety. Creating sustainable redevelopment requires forward thinking and preparing for the future. ONGOING OBJECTIVES • Determine, track and meet sustainability goals for metrics such as energy, transportation, water and waste. • Connect neighborhoods, businesses and open spaces. Updated August 12, 2020 Page 7 of 10 2020 – 2021 Proposed Budget Work Plan • Support the continued high quality of life offered to residents and those who work in Edina. • Promote affordable lifecycle housing. • Demonstrate resiliency to changing climate and future community needs. 2020-2021 BUDGET OBJECTIVES • Continue installation of sidewalks and shared-use paths (e.g., Twin Loops implementation). • Launch residential curbside organics and recycling (define numbers and goals). • Create affordable/workforce housing (1,220 units by 2030). 2020-2021 Strategy/Action: Dept Lead Quarterly Updates 1 Continue development and implement a strategy to create affordable housing units with revenue from the Affordable Housing Policy and from Southdale II TIF District special authority. Community Development Q2—Still in progress. Initial thoughts/action so far: Affordable Housing Trust Fund • Expansion of Homes With Reach Land Trust Program ($850,000 over two years • Housing Rehab Program? In discussion with Hennepin County • Continuation of 4D program (funds already set aside) • Gap financing for Dugan Plaza Southdale 2 TIF • 4040 W. 70th • Scattered site rental single- family housing in partnership with Metro HRA • Land acquisition for future affordable housing sites Acquisition of NOAH property (in partnership with affordable housing owner/manager) 2 Create and implement a green building policy to incent sustainable building and operational practices for new development and redevelopment. (Connected with 1-2) Engineering Q2—Currently on hold due to hiring freeze. 3 Develop waste reduction goals and implementation plan for residential organics recycling for April 2020 launch. Health Q2—COMPLETE. Program began in June. There are 100 tons of organics per month diverted from the waste stream. And a 30 percent participation rate in the organics recycling program. 4 Implement Energy Benchmarking ordinance. Engineering Q2—63 percent of the required building size have submitted their data. And 49 percent of the required buildings by size have submitted Updated August 12, 2020 Page 8 of 10 2020 – 2021 Proposed Budget Work Plan data and have been checked for accuracy and compliance. 5 Decide on future of redevelopment of the former Public Works site in the Grandview area by Q2 2021. Community Development Q2—Staff discussed options with HRA; due to time limitations, exploring alternative plan to improve local roadways before this vacant site is redeveloped. 6 Develop a Climate Action Plan for the City. (Q4 2021) Engineering Q2—On hold due to hiring freeze. 7 Complete study of expanding public parking at 44th and France and explore a strategy to create district parking in the 44th and France Area per the 44th and France Small Area Plan, including parameters that balance current transportation needs and sustainability goals. (Q4 2021) Community Development/ Finance Q2—Have compiled a list of property owners in the district and began conversations with some in regard to the idea of District Parking. Staff will convene conversation with property owners in late summer and fall to discuss interest and viability of potential solutions. 8 Develop Travel Demand Management Policy. (Q4 2020) Engineering Q2—Council provided comments on draft TDM plan at April 7 Work Session. Policy work continues. 9 Prepare a District Plan for the Cahill Industrial Park by Q4 2021. Community Development Q2—No progress. Move to 2021. 10 Work with Edina School District to develop and implement Safe Routes to Schools program. (Q4 2021) Engineering Q2—On hold with COVID-19 Pandemic and as School District group focused on busing instead until further notice. MnDOT grant program still going forward to create preliminary studies at Cornelia, Highlands and Creek Valley Elementary Schools. Goal 4: Foster Inclusive and Engaged Community It is important that the City helps to foster a community that is welcoming and inclusive to all who live, work and spend time in Edina. The City wants to ensure that it works for all of the community. Efforts to engage the community will utilize multiple platforms, be informative, transparent, responsive and involve volunteers and City Commissions. ONGOING OBJECTIVES • Ensure City policies and practices do not have disparate impacts based on race, color, national origin, creed, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender expression, familial status or disability. • Conduct clear and meaningful community engagement where: Updated August 12, 2020 Page 9 of 10 2020 – 2021 Proposed Budget Work Plan o The decision to be made and decision-making process is clearly defined. o Individuals understand how and when they can participate. o The City communicates what feedback is used and why. o Inclusive engagement methods provide a variety of ways for the public to participate in the decision-making process and ensure all voices are heard. o Residents are satisfied with the process, even if they disagree with the outcome. 2020-2021 BUDGET OBJECTIVES • Increase participation in Better Together Edina online engagement website. • Implement racial equity measures to provide accountability of work. • Strengthen leadership and support for city-wide racial equity work. • Better leverage Boards and Commissions. • Reduce barriers to public participation. • Increase diversity of boards, commissions, task forces and staff. NEW 2020-2021 Strategy/Action: Dept Lead Quarterly Updates 1 Continue implementation of Racial Equity Implementation Plan and provide quarterly reports to City Council and HRRC. (Q4 2020) Administration Q2—Progress report provided to Council and 2019 Race & Equity Progress Report presented April 21. 2 Continue to evaluate and further refine community engagement standards and protocols based on IAP2 model. (Q4 2020) Administration Q2— In progess. Making enhancements to Better Together site. 3 Develop measurable city-wide/department racial equity goals (Q3 2020) and incorporate racial equity tools and resources into decision-making processes. (Q1 2021) Administration Q2—In progress. Staff members are creating racial equity tools to use when creating work plan items. Key performance indicators have been developed and looking at how to capture data. Community Engagement & Racial Equity will collaborate with Sustainability division to create “triple bottom line” decision-making process. 4 Strengthen leadership and support for city-wide racial equity work, including providing additional training, tools and resources to embed an equity framework to City processes, services and decisions. This strategy will build upon all employee and leadership training conducted in 2018-2019. Administration Q2—In progess. Racial equity for remainder of leadership and all staff members is being developed to be delivered virtually. Racial equity goals are included in staff performance reviews. Updated August 12, 2020 Page 10 of 10 2020 – 2021 Proposed Budget Work Plan • Develop and implement racial equity leadership training, resources and support for City Council. (Q1 2020). • Conduct advanced racial equity training for staff leadership and foundational training for all employees. (Q2 2020). • Incorporate employee selected racial equity competency in annual performance review. (Q3 2020) Reviewing ERP system capabilities to incorporate competencies in performance review. 5 Develop and implement a plan to increase diversity of boards and commissions members. (Q3 2020) Administration Q2—In progess. MJ working on a proposal. Will tie this into an interview proposal. 1 Quarterly Financial Report AS OF JUNE 30, 2020 CITY OF EDINA INSIDE THIS ISSUE: General Fund Expenditures by Department ............................................3 Utility Fund Revenues and Expenses ....4 Liquor Fund Revenues and Expenses ...5 Parks & Recreation Enterprise Funds ..6 Cost Recovery .............................................9 Investments ...................................................10 Debt ................................................................12 QUESTIONS? Contact the Finance Department at 952-826-0366 or FinanceDepartment@ EdinaMN.Gov. Overview • In response to COVID, a budget adjustment to the general fund was approved by Council in May to decrease revenues by $1.4M and expenses by $2.05M for a net positive impact of about $600k. • COVID continues to impact our Parks & Recreation enterprises. Braemar Golf Course is doing well as players can get out to enjoy the course, but the Aquatic Center, Art Center and most of Edinborough Park remain closed. • We are in the process of updating COVID assumptions for the P&R enterprises through the end of the year and into 2021. Current projection is an additional $2.4M loss over the prior year. These losses will be covered through Liquor transfers and enterprise fund balances. • Liquor margin is down 28% resulting in a decrease to operating income of $490k year-over- year. Projected net operating income for 2020 is $500k vs $1.145M in 2019. • New accounting procedures implemented in 2020 include: • Establishment of internal service funds for IT, Facilities and Equipment Operations. • Updated allocations for shared service management costs. • New investment tracking software recording unrealized gains/losses monthly compared to annually. • Implementation of liquor loyalty program resulting in deferred revenue. General Fund Revenue and Expenditures • TAXES – Property taxes are the primary revenue source and are received in June and December. • LODGING TAX – Variance is due to timing. Lodging tax is received in one month and 95% is paid out to the Explore Edina program in the following month which crosses financial quarters. • LICENSES AND PERMITS – Increase compared to the prior year is due to the number/timing of permits. The number of building permits issued vs YTD 2019 is down slightly (979 vs 1,024), but the valuation is higher ($212M vs $95M) resulting in higher revenue. Larger projects include Millennium, Bowers Residence and Edina Community Center. • CHARGES FOR SERVICES – This decrease is due to a decrease in ambulance fees of $222k and Parks & Recreation registration fees of $296k partially offset by an increase in charges to other funds for shared management of $328k. The City transitioned to a new ambulance billing provider in Q1 2019 with higher catch-up ambulance revenue in 2019, as well as a decline in ambulance runs in 2020 due to COVID. Registration Fees are down as programs are canceled due to COVID. As part of the 2020 budget, shared management allocations were updated resulting in a larger allocation to enterprise funds. • FINES AND FORFEITURES – Decrease in court fines due to less traffic citations due to COVID. (Continued on next page) CITY OF EDINA • INVESTMENT INCOME – Investment income is recorded in this account throughout the year and allocated out to other funds for final financial statements. Investment income year-over- year is higher mostly due to new software which records unrealized gains/losses throughout the year. Unrealized gains account for $1.2M as of June 30, 2020. Previously, unrealized gains/ losses were only recorded at year end. • PERSONAL SERVICES – Lower than prior year due to central services of IT, Facilities and Equipment Operations being moved to internal service funds. • CONTRACTUAL SERVICES – Lower than prior year due to internal services being moved to internal service funds due to central services (IT, Facilities and Equipment operations). • COMMODITIES – 2020 commodities (e.g., repair parts and gasoline) are lower than prior year due to central services of IT, Facilities and Equipment Operations being moved to internal service funds due to central services (IT, Facilities and Equipment operations). • CENTRAL SERVICES – For 2020, IT, Facilities and Equipment Operations internal services were moved to Internal Service Funds. As a result, Central Services expense for the General Fund now represents the General Fund’s portion of those allocated budgeted costs. • INTERGOVERNMENTAL – The budget of $1.8M is mostly police/fire state aid. The aid is calculated based upon a percentage of insurance premiums paid and number of police officers. 2 3 CITY OF EDINA General Fund Expenditures by Department • GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES – Approximately 25% per quarter. • HUMAN RESOURCES – This is impacted by the amount of severance (i.e., compensated absences) in any given year. Severance expense June YTD 2020 is $78k vs prior year of $265k. Liability for compensated absences is reserved in the general fund assigned fund balance. • PUBLIC WORKS – Overall decrease compared to June YTD of last year is due to lower personal services OT for snow and ice removal ($107k). Favorability to budget is mostly due to unspent blacktop budget ($23k spent on budget of $566k). • POLICE – This increase over the prior year is due to planned additional staff in response to growing workloads and requests for services, staff movement (e.g., retirements, replacements) as well as annual salary and benefit increases. • FIRE – There was an increase in personal services line item with planned additional staff, changes in staff, as well as annual salary and benefit increases. • PARKS & RECREATION – Favorable to prior year and budget in personal services, contractual services and commodities due to decreased part-time staff and programs as a result of COVID. 4 CITY OF EDINA Utility Fund Revenues and Expenses • WATER, SEWER AND STORM SEWER FEES – Increased 5%, 5% and 8%, respectively, in 2020 over 2019. • SALE OF WATER – Water pumped June YTD is 918M gallons vs 913M gallons for same period in the prior year. • WATER REC FEE (WAC) AND SEWER REC FEE (SAC) – Dependent upon the number of new connections. June YTD 2020 has 417 SAC connections vs 25 in the same period 2019. Primary drivers in 2020 are the Millennium and Bowers Residence projects. • DISPOSAL CHARGES – Met Council sewer service. • CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS – Actuals represent the offset for water/storm/sewer internal charges. The revenue is recorded above and offset here resulting in a zero-impact to the bottom line. The impact was unknown at the time of budgeting; thus, the budget only represents the $100k transfer to the construction fund. 5 CITY OF EDINA Liquor Fund Revenues and Expenses • Revenues are down $1.2M YTD. The stores continue to work through the impact of COVID. Stores closed at end of the day March 17th and transitioned to 100% delivery out of 50th. On May 11th, 50th and Grandview reopened stores, transitioning delivery out of Southdale. Southdale store reopened on July 1st. The stores remain closed on Sundays. Customer counts are down 75k, but average transaction value (ATV) is up dramatically. Customers are visiting and ordering less frequently, but purchasing more. • In November 2019, liquor stores rolled out a loyalty program. Accounting for the loyalty program results in deferred revenue which has decreased revenue as the program grows and points are building. At the end of 2019, deferred revenue was $38k; at the end of Q2 2020, deferred revenue is $131k. • Total YTD gross margin is 25% compared to industry average of 25.1% (2019) and 26.4% for metro area liquor store operations (2018, last published). Margin has been negatively impacted in Q2 due to the loyalty program and physical inventory adjustments. • Inventory is $1.7M at the end of Q2, with a YTD inventory turn of two. Assuming consistent inventory levels and similar increase in sales in back half of the year, projected annual turns will be 4.4 compared to 5.2 and 6.4 in 2019 and 2018, respectively, and an industry average (pre COVID) of 5.6. Braemar Arena and Field • UTILIZATION – Represents hours scheduled out of total hours available. Prime vs nonprime is dependent upon the time of day and time of year, which is charged at differing rates. Utilization is lower due to COVID-19 closure and increased intervals between ice rental time slots. New interval is 20 minutes vs prior interval of 10 minutes. • ICE RENTAL – The Arena was closed March 17th and reopened June 8th. Current restrictions are 25 skaters plus coaches on ice and practices; games/tournaments are allowed following CDC/MDH guidelines. Braemar Golf Course and Dome • REVENUE – The regulation golf course opened April 18th under COVID-19 restrictions. Even under COVID restrictions, revenue is up vs prior year by $358k mostly due to green fees and golf dome receipts. Golf Dome’s new Toptracer Range technology was well received. Parks and Recreation Enterprise Funds On March 16, Governor Tim Walz issued Emergency Executive Order (EEO) 20-40 temporarily closing places of public accommodation which included all City’s enterprise locations due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Subsequent EEO’s extended that closure until May 18. Since then, the enterprises have been able to reopen at varying levels. 6 CITY OF EDINA 7 CITY OF EDINA Edinborough Park • Edinborough Park closed March 17th. The pool and track reopened on June 23rd to members and association partners only with limited hours and capacity. Reservations are required. Adventure Peak is still closed at this time. Aquatic Center • The Aquatic Center is closed for the season. All season passes previously sold, including those sold in 2019, have been refunded. Centennial Lakes • The putting course at Centennial Lakes opened on June 16th with limited hours of operation/capacity. Art Center • The Art Center closed March 17th and remains closed.CITY OF EDINA 8 CITY OF EDINA 9 Cost Recovery Cost recovery %’s indicate a facility’s ability to cover operating expenses. In 2018, the City established two cost recovery calculations. The first calculation, total cost recovery is operating revenue divided by operating expenses. Operating revenue and expenses exclude below-the-line items such as donations, investment income, bond interest and transfers. The second calculation, management cost recovery adjusts the total operating expenses to exclude depreciation, central services and water/storm/sewer. The following chart represents full year 2018 %’s, full year 2019 %’s, YTD 2020 %’s and annual targets for Management Cost Recovery. Differences between quarterly results and annual results may be due to the timing of revenues and expenses. For example, the Golf Dome is normally open and generating revenue October through April but has expenses all year. CITY OF EDINA The City’s investments are held in various accounts: –4M: Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund sponsored by the League of Minnesota Cities. The City uses this fund to manage bond proceeds to ensure compliance with IRS regulations. Funds from the 2018A and 2019A are included in this account. These bonds were issued to fund road reconstruction projects. As construction continues, the balance in this account will decrease. –Muni Bonds: The City owns the 2020 through 2028 maturities of the $1.265M Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2009A. –Other: A 1-year $245,000 FDIC insured Certificate of Deposit held at Tradition Capital Bank. –Investment Sweep: Funds not required to clear checks in the City’s checking account are automatically “swept” into this account and invested in commercial paper. The balance in this account changes daily based on the amount of checks outstanding. –Securian: Securian is the City’s outside investment manager, replacing Nuveen in January 2018. They oversee a $32 million portfolio. These securities are held in a custodian account at U.S. Bank. Funds in this account are not needed for cash flow and can be invested in longer maturities. The benchmark for this portfolio is a combination of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Intermediate Government Bond Index and the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Mortgage Backed Securities Index. Allowable investments include U.S. Treasuries and Agencies up to, but not including, 10 years and agency mortgage backed pass-through securities guaranteed by Ginnie Mae (GNMA), Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Freddie Mac (FHLMC). –City of Edina: This account is managed internally. The balance in this account at the end of Q2 was $53M. The City uses a network of three institutional brokers who recommend securities in compliance with our investment policy. Funds in this account are managed primarily for cash flow purposes and annual debt service payments. –Bond Proceeds: This account was created to house investment of bond proceeds at U.S. Bank. Investments At the end of the second quarter, the City’s investment portfolio totaled $100M. The return on the portfolio has declined due to the sudden decrease in interest rates and the ensuing market turmoil. One example of this is the earnings rate on the City’s money market. In January that rate was 1.47%. At the end of June that rate had dropped to 0.06%. As a result, it is expected that investment income will drop significantly for 2020. The following is a breakdown of total investments by custodian: The following represents the total investment pool by security type: Following represents the same data but only for the internally managed piece under custodianship of U.S. Bank: 11 CITY OF EDINA The following are yields for current investments against a similar benchmark. The internal and external portfolios have different investment strategies. • INTERNAL – The internal portfolio is intended to remain sufficiently liquid to enable the City to manage daily City cash flow as well as make debt payments. At the end of Q2 2020, the average days to maturity for the internal portfolio is approximately one year (including the money market account). Maturities range from one day (money market) to five years. The internal return has outpaced the internal benchmark due to holding investments purchased when rates were higher, to the extent the investments were not callable. • EXTERNAL – The external portfolio has longer term investment options to optimize return within our investment policy. The external portfolio benchmark of Bloomberg Barclays Intermediate U.S. Government/Mortgage Index represents an investment pool including U.S. Treasuries and Agencies up to, but not including, 10 years and agency mortgage backed pass-through securities guaranteed by Ginnie Mae (GNMA), Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Freddie Mac (FHLMC). At the end of the second quarter, the average days to maturity for the external portfolio is nine years with maturities ranging from one month to 30 years. The later maturities represent mortgage backed securities. Performance in Q2 closely followed the benchmark. Detail reports by investment are available upon request. 12 CITY OF EDINA Debt The following chart represents the City’s annual debt service requirements to maturity for existing bonds and estimated future bonds. The 2019 – 2023 Capital Improvement Plan calls for total capital spending of about $143M, of which debt will account for roughly $70M. Of that total, $47M is for utility infrastructure including a new water treatment plant payable from utility revenues and $23M for street reconstruction projects payable from special assessments assessed to benefitting properties. The term of the bond’s ranges from 10 to 15 years depending on the project. The 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Plan is currently in process. The new water treatment plan is now estimated for 2026/2027; thus, it has been removed from the below chart. NOTES Levy debt: includes general obligation (G.O.) bonds and public project revenue bonds which pledge the full faith and credit of the municipality to their payment. –G.O. bonds: represent City Hall debt, refunding bond issues for the fire station and public works, and the equipment certification issuance for fire trucks. –Public project revenue bonds: represent 2009A (public works), 2014A (Braemar Field and Backyard Ice Rink) and 2015A HRA bonds (gymnasiums). Other funding debt (non- levy) includes permanent improvement revolving (PIR) bonds and general obligation (G.O.) revenue bonds. PIR bonds are payable solely from special assessments. G.O. revenue bonds are payable primarily from enterprise revenue. Any deficiency to pay either the PIR bonds or the G.O. revenue bonds is provided for by general property taxes. –PIR bonds: used to finance any public improvement that may be specially assessed based on City code; the most common include roads, water and sewer improvements. –G.O. revenue bonds: represent debt for the Edina Aquatic Center, Braemar Golf Dome, Braemar Golf Course and Braemar Arena. Racial Equity Work Plan GOAL:TARGET STATUS PROGRESS Hire a full-time Race and Equity coordinator, whose accountabilities include oversight of the Racial Equity Implementation Plan (work plan), monitoring, assessing and evaluating progress toward goals.2019 - Q1 Complete Race and Equity Coordinator started on March 18, 2019. Racial Equity goals and metrics from the Racial Equity Implementation Plan will be incorporated into department work plans and employee performance reviews.2019 - Q1 In Progress All department work plans include Race and Equity Initiatives in 2020. Implementation of racial equity compentencies in employee performance reviews pushed to Q4-2020. The racial equity advancement team (REAT) will work identify specific opportunities to increase racial and cultural diversity on work teams.2019 - Q2 Complete/ Ongoing REAT has been monthly virtually and engaging in professional development opportunties. Training work group looking at creating supplemental training opportunties. Engagement work group is working on storytelling videos. Work Plan Support group creating tool to use while creating work plan items through race and equity lens. Report results of the Quality of Life Survey disaggregated by race/ethnicity as part of the Annual Racial Equity Advancement Report.2019 - Q2 Not Complete Survey results presented in June 2019. Because the number of non-white survey respondents was small, race/ethnicity could not be disaggregated for all questions. Plans for next Quality of Life survey will be reviewed. Evaluate feasibility and advisability of increasing the amount of police-community data collected by the City.2019 - Q2 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 The feasibility to collect data with current records management system (RMS) does not allow cohesive data collection. PD is integrated the data collection needs as the department will be researching for a new RMS system in 2021. In addition to system challenges, there is no standard data collection process or benchmarks established. Provide Racial Equity Training to all City staff.2019 - Q2 Complete Leadership training on 12/2018 and IQS Racial Equity training for full-time city employees in 1/2019. Racial equity competency requirements being reviewed for 2020 implementation. City Exectuive Leadership Team (ELT) completed racial equity training. Evaluate quality of life survey questions to elicit relevant information about all city services around Race and Equity.2019 - Q3 Complete Quality of Life survey results have been provided in June 2019. Maintain a database on the number and location of affordable housing in Edina.2019 - Q4 Complete/ Ongoing Database has been created and updated when multi-housing units are availble. Upon reviewing Police Department Policy Manual and removing non-public information, the manual will be placed on the City's website.2019 - Q4 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 Police Department and Race and Equity Coordinator have been reviewing police manual. Use of force policies and other police policies have been updated and placed on City website for public viewing. Investigate available data to desegregate maps of resident population by race and how this data can be linked to allocating funds through City budgeting processes (CIP, PACS, Operating)2019 - Q4 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 GIS analysis is being completed and PAC Prioritization was presented to Transportation Commission for feedback. A narrative description for each criterion is being written. Establish a Racial Equity Advancement Annual Report and presentation for the Human Rights and Relations Commission and City Council. The annual report to the City Council will be presented at the second Council meeting in January starting in January of 2020. 2020 - Q1 In Progress 2019 Race and Equity status was provided to City Council on April 21, 2020. GOAL:TARGET STATUS PROGRESS Deliver staff training on scholarship fund availability to ensure residents are provided the opportunity to apply for financial assistance.2019 - Q1 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 Parks and Recreation Department will discuss options about creating scholarship funds in the City. Once scholarship funds program or sliding scale fee are set up then training can occur. Review the existing Come Home 2 Edina program and advertisement strategy to families of color.2019 - Q3 Completed Brochures have been translated into Spanish; however, more intentional is being focused on alternative ways to market to families of color such as creating relationships with organizations. Demographic information continues to be collected through application process. ACCOUNTABILITY & DATA COLLECTION CITY FACILITIES & SERVICES Updated 8.12.2020 Page 1 of 4 Racial Equity Work Plan GOAL:TARGET STATUS PROGRESS Ensure City facility artwork and décor reflects diversity of race and culture.2019 - Q4 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 City Council approved a work plan item to create a rubric which will provide a standard for City staff to use to determine if artwork and décor reflect diversity of race and culture in City facilities in HRRC 2020 work plan. Boards and Commissions meetings were cancelled from March-May 2020 due to COVID-19. Review and identify if barriers to utilization of Park and Recreation programs exist and elicit solutions from community members and users.2019 - Q4 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 Boards and Commissions did not regularly meet until June 2020. Name a public facility in the Grandview area after BC and Ellen Yancey. Human Rights and Relations Commission will review and comment. Parks and Recreation Commission will review and recommend. 2019 - Q4 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 Boards and Commissions regular meetings reconvene until June 2020. HRRC submitted two recommendations to PARC for Yancey renaming. PARC will vote which location and submit one facility for recommendation to City Council in late 2020. Ensure facilities have wayfinding signage and printed materials in multiple languages.2019 - Q4 Ongoing/ Continuation in 2020 COVID-19 related materials have been translated in Spanish and Somali Employees will be trained on how to support first-time guests of City facilities.2020 - Q4 Not Started Due to COVD-19, no in person training with Parks and Recreation has taken place. GOAL:TARGET STATUS PROGRESS Add Metro transit link to facility website(s).2018 - Q4 Completed Links for Metro Transit has been added to facility website. Staff will create a standing City communications “Feedback Group" of volunteer residents that can be called upon via meeting, email, or as needed for both strategic and quick feedback to staff.2018 - Q4 Complete/ Ongoing Group has been assembled. First meeting in January 2019 and group will have ongoing meetings to receive feedback. The new City Community Engagement employee will ensure there is a robust community engagement approach, informed by ongoing relationship with residents, residents of color and residents forwhom English is a second language. 2019 - Q1 Complete/ Ongoing Community Engagement Coordinator continues to adapt engagement approach while looking at potential opportunity gaps to increase diversity. Optional demogaphic questions have been updated to align with Parks and Recreation registration system. The City will include questions on racial equity work in the 2019 Quality of Life Survey.2019 - Q1 Complete Survey included racial and self indicators to provide baseline information to help support racial equity work. Develop protocol and procedures to apply a race and equity perspective to communications content.2019 - Q2 In Progress/ Continuous in 2020 The HRRC has reviewed document and changes updated based on feedback. The protocol and procedures is a working document that will be revised as need to ensure relevance. Evaluate and improve the police department's current Community Outreach Programs. Consider opportunities for community members to engage with the department.2019 - Q2 Ongoing Due to COVID-19, many of Police Department Outreach Programs have been placed cancelled or on hold. During Community Outreach Program Evaluation, the police department will develop communication strategies to publicize and promote the department through communication methods including social media. 2019 - Q2 Ongoing Due to COVID-19, many of Police Department Outreach Programs have been placed cancelled or on hold. Develop a strategic approach to the city's community engagement efforts. Task a city employee with overseeing/directing community engagement work.2019 - Q4 Complete/ Ongoing Community Engagement Coordinator continues community members to engage, inform, and participate in city work, such as Better Together Edina, Boards and Commissions, and through community impact surveys. Google Translate has been added to Better Together Edina site. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT & COMMUNICATIONS CITY FACILITIES & SERVICES Updated 8.12.2020 Page 2 of 4 Racial Equity Work Plan GOAL:TARGET STATUS PROGRESS The City will develop plain language policy and an LEP (Limited English Proficiency) policy for City communications.2019 - Q4 In Progress Continuation in 2020 Plain Language Policy has been developed and training for staff has been completed. Limited English Policy has been created and reviewed by City administration. Next step is establishing interpretion services. Use insights gained from new partnerships and relationships with community, the City will find new ways to market and communicate to POC.2019 - Q4 Completed/ Ongoing Communications is continuing relationships with media outlets who focus on people of color and has been begun to distribute City of Edina press releases through modes such as text updates from the City and focus of accessibilty of communications in multiple languagses. Develop alternate ways to register for programs or use of City facilities. The city will develop new ways to reach and welcome new and underserved populations into the community.2019 - Q4 In Progress/ Continuous Google Translate continues to be used on City's registration software and Connect Card continues to be promoted. As a result of COVID-19, Parks and Recreation programming was cancelled. However, the Parks and Recreations provided alternative optons such as RecTivity boxes for at home programming. The Police Department will conduct a review of the Crime Report policy for posting individual names on the department website.2019 - Q4 Complete Weekly Crime Reports, as of October 7, 2019, names of individuals have been removed. The report contains age and gender of individuals and location of report. Archive timeframe changed from 6 months to 2 months. Discussion to monitor if there are changes in staff workflow based on change as well potential equity challenges that arise in the future. GOAL:TARGET STATUS PROGRESS Make a language edit to the Edina Affordable Housing Policy: The City recognizes the need to provide affordable housing in order to create and maintain a diverse population and to provide housing for those who live or work in the City. 2018 - Q4 Complete/ Ongoing Approved by Council October 2018. Policy is reviewed yearly. Develop goals and policies to increase the number of affordable housing units and rental until where housing assistance vouchers (ex. Section 8) can be used.2018 - Q4 Complete/ Ongoing Every owner/developer that has affordable housing units and rentals in Edina receives an affordable housing guide that includes non-discriminatory language. Request the Edina Housing Foundation to review the affordable housing policy to specifically consider removing the option for developers to opt-out of building affordable units.2019 - Q2 Complete Reviewed Affordable Housing Policy with Edina Housing Foundation to remove opt-out option. Decision to not remove opt-out policy because funds from Affordable Housing Trust Fund could be used to further program. Develop City-wide procedure and policy for responding to complaints that are perceived by staff as possibly racially motivated. Collect data on complaints that seem discriminatory in nature, including who makes the complaints and about whom. Apply this policy to complaints against those belonging to other protected groups. 2019 - Q2 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 Bias and Discrimination Form has been added to City and Better Together Edina websites for community members to complete. Review affordable housing policy annually to address current conditions and needs. Ensure race and equity policy perspective is used at each review period.2019 - Q4 Completed/ Ongoing Affordable Housing Policy reviewed and presented to Council in Q1-2020 Review Edina zoning regulations through a racial equity lens to change or remove language that may contribute to racial disparities. Develop language with the intention of reducing inequities in the City's zoning regulations. 2019 - Q4 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 Garage size variance will be submitted to City Council for first reading in Q3. Review process on using affordable housing funds received from the opt-out option and develop a policy to ensure funds will be used with a race and equity lens.2019 - Q4 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 A process is currently being used for "buy-in" options funds for land trust and other opportunities through a race and equity lens. The process will be reviewed and formalized. DEVELOPMENT & ENFORCEMENT OF POLICIES COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT & COMMUNICATIONS Updated 8.12.2020 Page 3 of 4 Racial Equity Work Plan GOAL:TARGET STATUS PROGRESS Review policy and outline requirement and enforcement mechanism to ensure associations and vendors that utilize/rent City facilities are operating in accordance with the city's expectation regarding race equity and inclusion. Post the policy throughout City facilities. 2019 - Q4 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 Feedback from REAT and has been presented to Parks and Recreation Commission for review. The policies are currently being reviewed to compile to create more alignment for all associations and vendors. Study and report on the 21st Century Policing Initiative's alignment with City of Edina's police officer field training processes.2019 - Q4 Completed 21st Century Policing Initiative review has been completed by Police Department. The Police Department will evaluate the Department Policy Manual through a race and equity lens related to use of force.2019 - Q4 Completed Use of Force Policy has been reviewed and placed on City website in Police Department. Review the Police Department’s Policy 690.00 of Impartial Policing.2019 - Q4 Completed Police Department Policy 690.00 of Impartial Policing has been reviewed, updated and placed on the City website for public The Police Department will analyze policies related to external and independent criminal investigations and prosecutions for Officer Involved shootings and In-Custody death incidents.2019 - Q4 Completed Officer involved shooting policy has been updated to include audio/video retention, supervisor to assist, and who speaks with media. Review the Police Department's Conduct of Department Members and Persons of Detained or In- Custody policies and consider adding a provision to current policies requiring officers to identify to individuals stopped or detained as soon as practical and reasonable. 2019 - Q4 Completed Review of Conduct of Department Members and Persons Detained or In-Custoday policies have been completed and added on Police Department website . Review feasibility of developing a policy to create an incentive for sellers to take Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loans.2019 - TBD In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 The feasibility of developing policy to incentivize property sellers to take Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loans is being reviewed. GOAL:TARGET STATUS PROGRESS Participate in a Twin Cities People of Color (POC) job fair in 2019 as either an employer or sponsor.2019 - Q4 Completed City staff and leadership participated in the October 2019 People of Color Job Fair in Minneapolis. Develop diversity recruiting strategy for City employees that identifies specific actions to be taken on an annual basis to more closely reflect demographics or Hennepin County.2019 - Q4 Ongoing/ Continuation in 2020 Tracking of racial demographics in applications, interview, and hiring process are being collected. Length of rention for hired employees will also start. At the end of the 2020. data will be reviewed from 2019, 2020 to determine trends and look at strategies. Human Resources staff will implement hiring practices to include more racially and culturally diverse outreach, inclusive applications questions, recruitment, selection and interview processes.2019 - Q4 Completed Application process has been revised such as interview question has been added through a race/diversity lens, interview panel training for staff. These changes have been completed and the next step will be assess the effectiveness of the changes. Hiring manager training will be reviewed in 2020. The City will assess and revise job descriptions as positions become available to include racial equity competencies.2019 - Q4 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 Job descriptions are being revised when positions are available for hiring. Researching racial equity competencies standards that can be added into all job postings. Train employees on the City code of conduct, safety and security procedures, language interpretation services and cost options.2019 - Q4 Not Started Hiring paused to COVID-19. Defer to Q4 -2020. Set goals of increasing the percentage of fulltime staff who are people of color and/or fluent in a language other than English.2019 - Q4 Ongoing/ Continuous in 2020 There has been an increase in People of Color who have applied, interviewed, and hired in 2019 and 2020. Data has been collected and will start to include rention of employees. With LEP policy being created, staff members who are fluent in another language can take language proficiency assessment and potentially provide interpretation, if needed. The City will include data on its employment goals in the Racial Equity Advancement Annual Report starting in 2020 for employment activities in 2019. 2020 - Q4 Not Started Human Resources will work with Race and Equity Coordinator to work on report to present in Q4. EMPLOYEE TRAINING & DIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT & ENFORCEMENT OF POLICIES Updated 8.12.2020 Page 4 of 4 Date: August 18, 2020 Agenda Item #: XIV. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Calendar of City Council Meetings and Events Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None; information only. INTRODUCTION: Date Time Meeting/Event Location Tues, Aug. 18 5:30 p.m.Work Session: CIP Virtual 7:00 p.m.City Council Regular Meeting Virtual Thurs, Aug. 27 7:30 a.m.Housing and Redevelopment Authority Virtual Tues, Sept. 1 5:30 p.m.Work Session: Morningside Flood Infrastructure P roject Virtual 7:00 p.m.City Council Regular Meeting Virtual Mon, Sept .7 Labor Day – City Hall Closed Thurs, Sept. 10 7:30 a.m.Housing and Redevelopment Authority Virtual Tues, Sept. 15 5:30 p.m.Work Session: Energy & Environment Commission; Climate Action Plan Virtual 7:00 p.m.City Council Regular Meeting Virtual Thurs, Sept. 24 7:30 a.m.Housing and Redevelopment Authority Virtual