Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2021-05-18 City Council Meeting Patcket
Agenda City Council Meeting City of Edina, Minnesota VIRTUAL MEETING Tuesday, May 18, 2021 7:00 PM Watch the meeting on cable TV or at EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeetings or Facebook.com/EdinaMN. To participate in Community Comment and Public Hearings: Call 800-374-0221. Enter Conference ID 1193697. Give the operator your name, street address and telephone number. Press *1 on your telephone keypad when you would like to get in the queue to speak. A City sta9 member will introduce you when it is your turn. I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Pledge of Allegiance IV.Approval Of Meeting Agenda V.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Mayor will invite residents to share issues or concerns that are not scheduled for a future public hearing. Items that are on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. The City Manager will respond to questions raised during Community Comments at the next meeting. A.City Manager's Response to Community Comments VI.Adoption Of Consent Agenda All agenda items listed on the Consent Agenda will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless requested to be removed by a Council Member. If removed the item will be considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve, unless otherwise noted in consent item.) A.Approve Minutes: Work Session and Regular, May 4, 2021 B.Approve Payment of Claims C.Resolution No. 2021-37: Approving James Metzen Mighty Ducks Grant Program Application D.Request for Purchase: Two Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SUV's E.Approve Waterbody Crossing Maintenance Agreement with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District F.Request for Purchase: W. 54th Street Project and Joint Powers Agreement with City of Minneapolis G.Request for Purchase: City Hall Water Heater Replacement H.Request for Purchase Change Order: Voice Evacuation System Braemar Arena I.Request for Purchase: Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project Ecological Support Services J.Approve 2021-2022 Union Contract for IAFF Local 1275 for Fire@ghters K.Approve New On-Sale Wine and 3.2 On-Sale Beer Liquor License for Peoples Organic CoBee Bakery Cafes, Inc.dba Peoples Organic L.Resolution No. 2021-42: Accepting Donations VII.Special Recognitions And Presentations A.U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar Update B.Proclamation: Emergency Medical Services Week C.Proclamation: Preservation Month D.2021 Heritage Preservation Award E.2020 Race and Equity Summary Report VIII.Public Hearings During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after staB and/or applicants make their presentations. The following guidelines are in place to ensure an eDcient, fair, and respectful hearing; limit your testimony to three minutes and to the matter under consideration; the Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary; avoid repeating remarks or points of view made by previous speakers. The use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2021-40, Denying Appeal Request for Reasonable Accommodation at 6222 Braeburn Circle B.PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance No. 2021-03 Resolution No. 2021- 41 Preliminary Rezoning from PCD-1 and APD to PUD at 4917 Eden Avenue IX.Reports/Recommendations: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A.Sketch Plan Review for 4911 77th Street West X.Aviation Noise Update XI.Mayor And Council Comments XII.Manager's Comments A.Budget Work Plan and Financial Report Updates XIII.Calendar of City Council Meetings and Events XIV.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampli@cation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: May 18, 2021 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:City Manager's Response to Community Comments Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: City Manager Neal will respond to questions asked at the previous council meeting. Date: May 18, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve Minutes: Work Session and Regular, May 4, 2021 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Minutes as presented. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: Draft Regular, May 4 Minutes: Draft Work Session, May 4 Page 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL VIRTUAL MEETING MAY 4, 2021 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. and stated the meeting was being held remotely in compliance with Governor Walz’ Stay at Home Order then shared the procedure for public hearing and community comment. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland. Absent: None. III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IV. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED AS PRESENTED Member Pierce made a motion, seconded by Member Anderson, to approve the meeting agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared. V.A. CITY MANAGER’S RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY COMMENTS Manager Neal said there were no Community Comments at the last meeting. VI. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED AS AMENDED Mr. Neal said Item VI.M. could be removed from consideration as the calendar change was no longer necessary. Member Anderson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, approving the consent agenda as amended, removing Items VI.H, VI.I, I.L, and VI.M. VI.A. Approve minutes of the Work Session and Regular Meetings of April 20, 2021 VI.B. Approve payment claims Check Register Claims Pre-List dated April 23, 2021, totaling $409,821.52 and Check Register Claims Pre-List dated April 3, 2021, totaling $1,824,073.42 VI.C. Adopt Resolution No. 2021-38; Providing for the Sale of $14,505,000 General Obligation Bonds Series 2021A VI.D. Request for Purchase; awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Construction Materials Testing for Melody Lake Roadway Reconstruction, Braun Intertec in the amount of $49,999 VI.E. Request for Purchase; awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Creek Knoll A&B Roadway Reconstruction, McNamara Contracting in the amount of $2,904,014.07 VI.F. Request for Purchase; awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Electric Vehicle Chargers, Carbon Day in the amount of $28,475.25 VI.G. Request for Purchase; awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Rental Dehumidification Unit for Braemar Arena South Rink, United Rentals in the amount of $31,900 VI.H. Transportation Commission Work Plan Modification VI.I. Traffic Safety Report of March 30, 2021 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4, 2021 Page 2 VI.J. Approve New On-Sale Wine and 3.2 On-Sale Beer Liquor License for El Camino Taco Deli, LLC dba El Camino Taco Deli VI.K Rescind Commission Bylaws VI.L. Mary Brindle to Represent the City on the Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) VI.M. Revised 2021 Calendar of Meeting Dates VI.N. Adopt Resolution No. 2021-39; Accepting Donations Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA: VI.H. TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION WORK PLAN MODIFICATION – APPROVED The Council spoke about the need for a safe crosswalk on 42nd and France and its hope that the Transportation Commission would include consideration of this request in review of the overall work plan. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, to approve the Transportation Commission work plan modification. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VI.I. TRAFFIC SAFETY REPORT OF MARCH 30, 2021 – APPROVED Member Anderson said he would recuse himself from consideration of this item due to his ownership of the building at 3935 West 49th Street with regard to Item A1, accessible on street parking permit. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, to approve the Traffic Safety Report of March 30, 2021. Rollcall: Ayes: Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VI.L. MARY BRINDLE TO REPRESENT THE CITY ON THE NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE (NOC) – APPOINTED The Council thanked former member Brindle for her service on the NOC as she has stepped forward on a volunteer basis in this role and does a wonderful job serving the community in this important role. Member Anderson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, to appoint Mary Brindle to represent the City on the Noise Oversight Committee. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VII. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS VII.A. NATIONAL POLICE WEEK – PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read in full a proclamation to declare May 9-15, 2021 as National Police Week in the City of Edina and shared a flag raising ceremony would be held on May 11 to recognize the hard work and dedication of the officers of the Edina Police Department. Sergeant Mendel thanked the Council for its support of the department then shared there had been 119 line of duty deaths in the past year with one from Minnesota. He asked that the community remember them all and spoke on the unique and challenging profession police work was and how Edina officers would continue to respond with integrity and compassion. The Council thanked the department for its work during these difficult times. Member Pierce made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, to approve a proclamation recognizing National Police Week. Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4, 2021 Page 3 Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VII.B. NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK – PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read in full a proclamation declaring May 16-22, 2021, as National Public Works Week in the City of Edina. Public Works Director Anderson said this year’s theme was “Stronger Together” and showed that by working together they could impact citizens and help make Edina a great place to live. He outlined the work that continued throughout the pandemic and thanked the public for their patience. The Council thanked the team for their hard work in responding to the community’s requests. Member Anderson made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson, to approve a proclamation recognizing National Public Works Week. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VIII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. BIAS EVENT RESPONSE PLAN – APPROVED Race and Equity Coordinator Lee shared the Bias Offense Response Plan was presented to City Council for approval on March 16, 2021. City Council provided feedback on the plan and requested the Human Rights and Relations Commission consider changes and make revisions. The changes were accepted by the Human Rights and Relations Commission to change the plan name to Bias Event Response Plan. She explained how the Council had suggested the change as a bias event could be defined as either a bias offense or incident and would be consistent with Statute then thanked the HRRC members for their work. The Council thanked the HRRC for their work then explained how this work had occurred as a result of some chalk drawings that were biased but did not reach a level of crime. The Council said it was important that the plan was worded in a very clear manner and it was pleased with the result. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Anderson, to approve the updated Bias Event Response Plan and update from Human Rights and Relations Commissions. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS - Received IX.A. COMMISSION CORRESPONDENCE (MINUTES AND ADVISORY COMMUNICATION) 1. ADVISORY COMMUNITION: POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY LEGISLATION 2. MINUTES: ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION, MARCH 11, 2021 3. MINUTES: TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, MARCH 18, 2021 4. MINUTES: HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION, MARCH 23, 2021 5. MINUTES: ARTS & CULTURE COMMISSION, MARCH 25, 2021 The Council discussed a proposed statement for presentation to the Legislature regarding police accountability and reform prior to their adjournment on May 17. The Council discussed changes to the proposed statement that highlighted the need for continued work in this area and that the statement should come from the City Council directly. Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4, 2021 Page 4 Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson, to accept proposed Statement #1 regarding police accountability and reform for presentation to the State Legislature. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE – Received XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received XII. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received XII.A. PREP MEMOR FOR MAY 4, 2021, CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AND MEETING XIII. CALENDAR OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AND EVENTS – Received XIV. ADJOURNMENT Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, to adjourn the meeting at 8:07 p.m. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, May 18, 2021. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the May 4, 2021, meeting available. MINUTES OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION VIRTUAL MEETING TUESDAY, MAY 4, 2021 5:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:37 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, and Mayor Hovland. Staff in attendance: Scott Neal, City Manager; Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator; Heidi Lee, Race and Equity Coordinator; Ryan Browning, IT Director; Risi Karim, City Management Fellow; Jennifer Garske, Executive Assistant; and Sharon Allison, City Clerk. JOINT MEETING: COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMISSION Chair Selleys reviewed the commission’s work plan as follow: • Initiative #1) Study and report the benefits of social connectedness, including examples of locally focused initiatives from around the state/country to reduce social isolation. Commissioner King-Lowe reported on an app that individuals could use to share their personal information with first responders. He said communities using the app have had positive experience with it. • Initiative #2) Study and report possible City actions, policies, or code changes regarding smoking activity in multi-unit properties. Include local and national examples. Commissioner Hawkins reported that they have met with property owners in Edina who are supportive of a smoke-free ordinance, and with the City of Bloomington whose ordinance is almost completed. Hawkins said this is not a common ordinance and there are nuances such as medical marijuana use. • Initiative #3) Study and report on existing programs in Edina and Hennepin County regarding opioid use. Provide examples of efforts to increase public awareness of existing programs. Commissioner Wright said after research, in addition to Edina’s first responders use of Narcon, they would be recommending that the City use its website to increase awareness and make it easier for people to find locations where they can dispose of opioids. The Council asked if the commission could move mental health issues from their parking lot to their work plan and Chair Selleys thought they could fit it in to their 2021 work plan. In attendance for the commission were Chair Julia Selleys, Vice Chair Andrew Hawkins, Greg Wright, Isadora Li, Philip King-Lowe, Mary Absolon, Michael Wood, Ellie Mullen, and Robert Loesch. JOINT MEETING: HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION Chair Epstein reviewed the commission’s work plan as follow: • Initiative #1) Coordinate Days of Remembrance Recognition was being scheduled for June or July 2021 as a virtual or hybrid event. • Initiative #2) Tom Oye Award: Coordinate and select one recipient for the 2021 Tom Oye Award. The award presentation would be scheduled for a December 2021 Council meeting. • Initiative #3) Coordinate 2021 “Sharing Values, Sharing Communities” event focused on Race, Justice, and Policing tied to Initiative #4. An event with speakers was being planned for this fall. • Initiative #4) Complete community conversations about Race, Justice and Policing that began in 2020. This was being planned in conjunction with Initiative #3. Edina City Council Work Session Meeting, May 4, 2021 • Initiative #5) Bias Offense & Incident Response Plan Review and meet with police department representative quarterly for updates. The Plan was scheduled for Council approval at its regular meeting following this work session, and the police chief now meets quarterly with the HRRC. • Initiative #6) Review and comment on staff proposed plan to identify barriers for participation and reach communities of color through different modes and feedback. Staff was in the process of drafting the plan. The Council expressed concerns that Initiatives #3 and #4 were conversational rather than taking action towards local reform. The Council recommended a joint commission meeting of the Human Rights and Relations and Community Health Commissions with the police department to discuss 21st century policing. In attendance for the commission were Chair Michael Epstein, Vice Chair Jasmine Brett Stringer Moore, and Joni Bennett. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ____________________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by the Edina City Council, May 18, 2021. ___________________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Date: May 18, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Claims From:Don Uram, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Approve Payment of Claims Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve claims for payment: Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 05.07.21 TOTAL $855,555.12 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 05.14.21 TOTAL $605,786.22 INTRODUCTION: Claims information for approval is attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 05.07.21 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 05.14.21 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 44 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND SUB FUND DUE TO DUE FR 1000 General 133,790.132600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 9,417.502600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 45,977.402600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 5,982.502600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 136,193.122600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 255.004000 Capital Projects 11,893.694400 PIR Capital Projects 3,484.005100 Art Center 181.875200 Braemar Golf Course 11,891.155200 Braemar Golf Course 63.285300 Aquatic Center 475.905400 Edinborough Park 2,320.875500 Braemar Arena 23,674.885600 Braemar Field 6,021.165700 Centennial Lakes 569.985800 Liquor 262,479.015900 Utility Fund 35,113.135900 Utility Fund 5,355.265900 Utility Fund 16,290.505900 Utility Fund 67,985.006000 Risk Management 22,986.806100 Equipment Operations 21,005.276200 Information Technology 2,932.046300 Facilities Management 4,581.787100 PS Training Facility 358.987200 MN Task Force 1 24,274.929999 Pooled Cash Fund 855,555.12 TOTAL 855,555.12 855,555.12 ** END OF REPORT - Generated by Lonnia Jefferson ** City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 1 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 458890 05/07/2021 PRTD 151171 7TH STREET BEER COMPANY 1637 04/21/2021 20210705 648.00 CHECK 458890 TOTAL: 648.00 458891 05/07/2021 PRTD 133644 A DYNAMIC DOOR CO INC 22103261 04/09/2021 20210705 435.70 A DYNAMIC DOOR CO INC 22104091 04/11/2021 20210705 847.23 CHECK 458891 TOTAL: 1,282.93 458892 05/07/2021 PRTD 133140 ACROSS THE STREET PRODUCTIONS INC INV06920 02/24/2021 20210705 1,800.00 CHECK 458892 TOTAL: 1,800.00 458893 05/07/2021 PRTD 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 910725719 04/09/2021 20210705 643.85 ACUSHNET COMPANY 910729165 04/10/2021 20210705 135.73 ACUSHNET COMPANY 910741758 04/12/2021 20210705 158.76 ACUSHNET COMPANY 910753163 04/13/2021 20210705 119.72 ACUSHNET COMPANY 910701834 04/07/2021 20210705 654.18 CHECK 458893 TOTAL: 1,712.24 458894 05/07/2021 PRTD 143557 ADIDAS AMERICA INC 6153201334 04/11/2021 20210705 67.33 ADIDAS AMERICA INC 6153185501 04/08/2021 20210705 88.55 CHECK 458894 TOTAL: 155.88 458895 05/07/2021 PRTD 105162 THE ADT SECURITY CORPORATION 7032 03/13/2021 20210705 124.39 CHECK 458895 TOTAL: 124.39 458896 05/07/2021 PRTD 160027 AGILITY TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION INV-2231 03/19/2021 20210705 11,025.00 CHECK 458896 TOTAL: 11,025.00 458897 05/07/2021 PRTD 120796 ALERUS RETIREMENT AND BENEFITS C105741 04/05/2021 20210705 178.00 CHECK 458897 TOTAL: 178.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 2 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 458898 05/07/2021 PRTD 141768 ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC 11619523 04/07/2021 20210705 8.16 CHECK 458898 TOTAL: 8.16 458899 05/07/2021 PRTD 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1NCL-DDCG-JF1F 03/30/2021 20210705 90.44 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1YR9-1F1H-YDM4 03/30/2021 20210705 -21.49 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1JX9-WRW3-QKFJ 04/06/2021 20210705 108.43 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1GVV-WJ1R-KW7V 04/07/2021 20210705 84.89 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1H9G-WCKX-H1LV 04/07/2021 20210705 134.84 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1THT-PF3Q-NRCL 04/07/2021 20210705 41.20 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1MLM-XXJ9-QLT7 04/08/2021 20210705 71.96 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1Y4H-LN7X-V17H 04/09/2021 20210705 75.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1QCH-WGCX-4MCL 04/09/2021 20210705 287.91 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 17HG-QQ4F-TQVX 04/11/2021 20210705 99.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 17HG-QQ4F-W4CM 04/11/2021 20210705 174.50 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 131C-VDRT-GQCH 04/11/2021 20210705 115.89 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1GHX-VK6W-6MKP 04/11/2021 20210705 1,488.02 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1GHX-VK6W-H9HP 04/11/2021 20210705 44.67 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1GHX-VK6W-NDH6 04/12/2021 20210705 1,799.06 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1MTL-WXWJ-C9TY 04/12/2021 20210705 16.10 CHECK 458899 TOTAL: 4,611.41 458900 05/07/2021 PRTD 100575 AMERICAN CYLINDER LLC 186502 04/13/2021 20210705 398.49 AMERICAN CYLINDER LLC 185913 03/25/2021 20210705 116.78 CHECK 458900 TOTAL: 515.27 458901 05/07/2021 PRTD 160022 AMERICAN GARAGE DOOR SUPPLY, INC 1067118 04/12/2021 20210705 145.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 3 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 458901 TOTAL: 145.00 458902 05/07/2021 PRTD 151441 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 1005022598 04/06/2021 20210705 262.95 CHECK 458902 TOTAL: 262.95 458903 05/07/2021 PRTD 151756 ARBEITER BREWING COMPANY LLC 239 04/15/2021 20210705 144.00 ARBEITER BREWING COMPANY LLC 238-A 04/15/2021 20210705 144.00 ARBEITER BREWING COMPANY LLC 256 04/22/2021 20210705 324.00 ARBEITER BREWING COMPANY LLC 255 04/22/2021 20210705 90.00 CHECK 458903 TOTAL: 702.00 458904 05/07/2021 PRTD 114475 ARMOR SECURITY INC 236769 04/07/2021 20210705 164.00 CHECK 458904 TOTAL: 164.00 458905 05/07/2021 PRTD 106304 ASPEN MILLS INC 272486 04/09/2021 20210705 72.95 ASPEN MILLS INC 272487 04/09/2021 20210705 93.95 ASPEN MILLS INC 272485 04/09/2021 20210705 338.25 CHECK 458905 TOTAL: 505.15 458906 05/07/2021 PRTD 102113 AUDRANN INC 1306604 04/06/2021 20210705 100.76 CHECK 458906 TOTAL: 100.76 458907 05/07/2021 PRTD 101718 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 380048812 04/08/2021 20210705 5.40 CHECK 458907 TOTAL: 5.40 458908 05/07/2021 PRTD 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23271827.01-3 04/14/2021 20210705 12,317.00 CHECK 458908 TOTAL: 12,317.00 458909 05/07/2021 PRTD 102709 BDS LAUNDRY SYSTEMS V413140 04/12/2021 20210705 271.95 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 4 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 458909 TOTAL: 271.95 458910 05/07/2021 PRTD 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0088862200 04/15/2021 20210705 7,253.85 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0103052700 04/15/2021 20210705 125.32 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0088862500 04/15/2021 20210705 85.55 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0088917100 04/15/2021 20210705 -19.25 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0088861800 04/15/2021 20210705 6,939.75 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0088862600 04/15/2021 20210705 3,287.60 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0103052800 04/15/2021 20210705 265.53 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0103058500 04/15/2021 20210705 296.28 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0088962100 04/22/2021 20210705 6,340.40 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0088941600 04/22/2021 20210705 89.55 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0088941500 04/22/2021 20210705 302.65 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0088971100 04/22/2021 20210705 406.55 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0088962300 04/22/2021 20210705 1,279.25 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0103093400 04/22/2021 20210705 217.99 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0088962000 04/22/2021 20210705 6,915.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0089004500 04/22/2021 20210705 511.75 CHECK 458910 TOTAL: 34,297.77 458911 05/07/2021 PRTD 104416 BERNARD J MULCAHY COMPANY INC PS-INV125318 04/08/2021 20210705 866.14 CHECK 458911 TOTAL: 866.14 458912 05/07/2021 PRTD 143097 BERRY DUNN MCNEIL & PARKER LLC 401508 04/12/2021 20210705 850.00 CHECK 458912 TOTAL: 850.00 458913 05/07/2021 PRTD 100648 BERTELSON BROTHERS INC OE-557075-1 10/27/2020 20210705 34.22 BERTELSON BROTHERS INC WO-1095323-1 10/26/2020 20210705 65.06 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 5 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET BERTELSON BROTHERS INC WO-1121459-1 04/08/2021 20210705 36.01 BERTELSON BROTHERS INC WO-1122054-1 04/12/2021 20210705 68.70 CHECK 458913 TOTAL: 203.99 458914 05/07/2021 PRTD 128914 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 31051 04/08/2021 20210705 94.09 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 31042 04/07/2021 20210705 29.00 CHECK 458914 TOTAL: 123.09 458915 05/07/2021 PRTD 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 12269 04/15/2021 20210705 198.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 12267 04/15/2021 20210705 198.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 12268 04/15/2021 20210705 198.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 12375 04/22/2021 20210705 389.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 12374 04/22/2021 20210705 389.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 12373 04/22/2021 20210705 389.00 CHECK 458915 TOTAL: 1,761.00 458916 05/07/2021 PRTD 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 164463 04/08/2021 20210705 130.94 CHECK 458916 TOTAL: 130.94 458917 05/07/2021 PRTD 151149 BOARMAN KROOS VOGEL GROUP INC 56490 04/10/2021 20210705 1,545.16 CHECK 458917 TOTAL: 1,545.16 458918 05/07/2021 PRTD 125138 BOLK ENTERPRISES INC E-13391 04/05/2021 20210705 310.00 CHECK 458918 TOTAL: 310.00 458919 05/07/2021 PRTD 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC 0266774 03/31/2021 20210705 1,287.50 BOLTON & MENK INC 0266765 03/31/2021 20210705 392.00 BOLTON & MENK INC 0266767 03/31/2021 20210705 7,929.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 6 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 458919 TOTAL: 9,608.50 458920 05/07/2021 PRTD 101010 BORDER STATES INDUSTRIES INC 921876839 04/12/2021 20210705 175.70 CHECK 458920 TOTAL: 175.70 458921 05/07/2021 PRTD 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84012401 04/05/2021 20210705 612.65 CHECK 458921 TOTAL: 612.65 458922 05/07/2021 PRTD 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 176973 04/20/2021 20210705 786.50 BOURGET IMPORTS 176974 04/20/2021 20210705 1,227.25 BOURGET IMPORTS 176972 04/20/2021 20210705 499.00 CHECK 458922 TOTAL: 2,512.75 458923 05/07/2021 PRTD 117040 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC 946794 04/07/2021 20210705 109.90 CHECK 458923 TOTAL: 109.90 458924 05/07/2021 PRTD 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339184998 04/21/2021 20210705 248.65 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339184997 04/21/2021 20210705 5,426.22 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339184994 04/21/2021 20210705 1,457.78 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339184996 04/21/2021 20210705 181.34 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339184995 04/21/2021 20210705 453.80 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339185025 04/21/2021 20210705 1,563.53 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339185026 04/21/2021 20210705 248.65 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339185024 04/21/2021 20210705 178.95 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339185028 04/21/2021 20210705 1,840.08 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339185027 04/21/2021 20210705 736.30 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339184993 04/22/2021 20210705 178.95 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339185022 04/21/2021 20210705 429.80 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339185023 04/21/2021 20210705 2,072.54 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 7 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339185016 04/21/2021 20210705 249.15 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339185017 04/21/2021 20210705 522.60 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339185019 04/21/2021 20210705 805.18 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339185020 04/21/2021 20210705 805.18 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339185021 04/21/2021 20210705 77.15 CHECK 458924 TOTAL: 17,475.85 458925 05/07/2021 PRTD 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 339164804 04/20/2021 20210705 2,841.00 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 339164789 04/20/2021 20210705 4,618.10 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 339164788 04/20/2021 20210705 166.20 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 339204774 04/22/2021 20210705 4,985.00 CHECK 458925 TOTAL: 12,610.30 458926 05/07/2021 PRTD 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 339164803 04/20/2021 20210705 7,693.10 CHECK 458926 TOTAL: 7,693.10 458927 05/07/2021 PRTD 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 932928905 04/05/2021 20210705 168.60 CALLAWAY GOLF 932949044 04/07/2021 20210705 558.00 CALLAWAY GOLF 932968269 04/09/2021 20210705 216.00 CHECK 458927 TOTAL: 942.60 458928 05/07/2021 PRTD 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2536308 04/16/2021 20210705 351.00 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2536309 04/16/2021 20210705 1,289.60 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2536310 04/16/2021 20210705 -21.70 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2536311 04/16/2021 20210705 2,206.85 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2536313 04/16/2021 20210705 58.50 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2537720 04/20/2021 20210705 2,331.30 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2537721 04/20/2021 20210705 126.49 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 8 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2537722 04/20/2021 20210705 117.00 CHECK 458928 TOTAL: 6,459.04 458929 05/07/2021 PRTD 105497 CENTRAL ROOFING COMPANY 28337 04/05/2021 20210705 3,200.00 CHECK 458929 TOTAL: 3,200.00 458930 05/07/2021 PRTD 130618 CHANHASSEN AUTO CENTERS LLC 21664 04/06/2021 20210705 2,151.54 CHANHASSEN AUTO CENTERS LLC 21673 04/07/2021 20210705 1,311.38 CHECK 458930 TOTAL: 3,462.92 458931 05/07/2021 PRTD 100683 CHEMSEARCH 7324830 04/07/2021 20210705 657.22 CHECK 458931 TOTAL: 657.22 458932 05/07/2021 PRTD 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 4080510489 04/05/2021 20210705 25.20 CINTAS CORPORATION 4080510922 04/05/2021 20210705 30.25 CINTAS CORPORATION 4080510715 04/05/2021 20210705 9.86 CINTAS CORPORATION 4080510828 04/05/2021 20210705 39.62 CINTAS CORPORATION 4080510701 04/05/2021 20210705 28.62 CINTAS CORPORATION 4080510341 04/05/2021 20210705 37.20 CINTAS CORPORATION 4080510443 04/05/2021 20210705 71.69 CINTAS CORPORATION 4080510852 04/05/2021 20210705 36.88 CINTAS CORPORATION 4081038959 04/09/2021 20210705 63.28 CINTAS CORPORATION 4081038960 04/09/2021 20210705 54.02 CINTAS CORPORATION 4081196657 04/12/2021 20210705 30.25 CINTAS CORPORATION 4081196705 04/12/2021 20210705 39.01 CINTAS CORPORATION 4081196732 04/12/2021 20210705 36.88 CINTAS CORPORATION 4081196631 04/12/2021 20210705 3.69 CINTAS CORPORATION 4081196640 04/12/2021 20210705 9.86 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 9 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CINTAS CORPORATION 4081196723 04/12/2021 20210705 28.62 CHECK 458932 TOTAL: 544.93 458933 05/07/2021 PRTD 139927 CITY OF ROCHESTER MN MN-TF 04052021 04/05/2021 20210705 2,424.86 CHECK 458933 TOTAL: 2,424.86 458934 05/07/2021 PRTD 139927 CITY OF ROCHESTER MN 8009 04/10/2021 20210705 8,959.58 CHECK 458934 TOTAL: 8,959.58 458935 05/07/2021 PRTD 139927 CITY OF ROCHESTER MN 8010 04/12/2021 20210705 3,287.54 CHECK 458935 TOTAL: 3,287.54 458936 05/07/2021 PRTD 139927 CITY OF ROCHESTER MN 8011 04/12/2021 20210705 559.72 CHECK 458936 TOTAL: 559.72 458937 05/07/2021 PRTD 139927 CITY OF ROCHESTER MN 8013 04/12/2021 20210705 1,441.49 CHECK 458937 TOTAL: 1,441.49 458938 05/07/2021 PRTD 100087 CITY OF SAINT PAUL IN45004 04/08/2021 20210705 1,730.93 CHECK 458938 TOTAL: 1,730.93 458939 05/07/2021 PRTD 146472 CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE OF MN 42009000288 04/29/2020 20210705 756.00 CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE OF MN 42009000290 04/29/2020 20210705 3,627.00 CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE OF MN 42009000289 04/29/2020 20210705 756.00 CHECK 458939 TOTAL: 5,139.00 458940 05/07/2021 PRTD 145926 CLEARWATER ANALYTICS LLC 519423 04/06/2021 20210705 849.31 CHECK 458940 TOTAL: 849.31 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 10 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 458941 05/07/2021 PRTD 102165 ROGER CLEVELAND GOLF CO. INC 6339979 SO 04/07/2021 20210705 20.00 CHECK 458941 TOTAL: 20.00 458942 05/07/2021 PRTD 120433 COMCAST HOLDINGS CORPORATION 0540232-4/21 04/08/2021 20210705 118.87 CHECK 458942 TOTAL: 118.87 458943 05/07/2021 PRTD 144092 CONCENTRA 103345780 04/07/2021 20210705 420.50 CHECK 458943 TOTAL: 420.50 458944 05/07/2021 PRTD 129923 CONTEMPORARY INC V762179 04/08/2021 20210705 517.96 CHECK 458944 TOTAL: 517.96 458945 05/07/2021 PRTD 144880 CRYSTAL LAKE UPHOLSTERY 2001 04/06/2021 20210705 215.00 CHECK 458945 TOTAL: 215.00 458946 05/07/2021 PRTD 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO INC 203179 04/06/2021 20210705 183.36 CHECK 458946 TOTAL: 183.36 458947 05/07/2021 PRTD 133169 DAIKIN APPLIED 3301003 04/06/2021 20210705 1,742.00 CHECK 458947 TOTAL: 1,742.00 458948 05/07/2021 PRTD 104020 DALCO ENTERPRISES INC 3763230 04/05/2021 20210705 564.20 CHECK 458948 TOTAL: 564.20 458949 05/07/2021 PRTD 102195 DAY INVESTMENTS LLC P38430687 04/06/2021 20210705 146.58 CHECK 458949 TOTAL: 146.58 458950 05/07/2021 PRTD 100718 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 15378/1 04/07/2021 20210705 305.71 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 16003/1 04/08/2021 20210705 162.88 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 16121/1 04/08/2021 20210705 256.80 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 11 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 458950 TOTAL: 725.39 458951 05/07/2021 PRTD 118805 DISCOUNT STEEL INC 5162547 04/05/2021 20210705 8.91 DISCOUNT STEEL INC 5164363 04/09/2021 20210705 36.35 CHECK 458951 TOTAL: 45.26 458952 05/07/2021 PRTD 151282 DIVERSYS LEARNING INC 8693 02/01/2021 20210705 25.90 CHECK 458952 TOTAL: 25.90 458953 05/07/2021 PRTD 139203 DMV - HENNEPIN COUNTY 8778 04/21/2021 20210705 3,068.04 CHECK 458953 TOTAL: 3,068.04 458954 05/07/2021 PRTD 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3654392 04/06/2021 20210705 2,862.00 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3654390 04/06/2021 20210705 482.50 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3654391 04/06/2021 20210705 397.50 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3654393 04/06/2021 20210705 1,113.00 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3654394 04/06/2021 20210705 3,815.00 CHECK 458954 TOTAL: 8,670.00 458955 05/07/2021 PRTD 150827 DRASTIC MEASURES BREWING, LLC 1238 04/16/2021 20210705 243.00 DRASTIC MEASURES BREWING, LLC 1245 04/21/2021 20210705 225.00 CHECK 458955 TOTAL: 468.00 458956 05/07/2021 PRTD 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 829032 04/08/2021 20210705 77.35 CHECK 458956 TOTAL: 77.35 458957 05/07/2021 PRTD 100049 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES 86608 04/12/2021 20210705 318.75 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES 86560 04/12/2021 20210705 15,868.75 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES 86569 04/12/2021 20210705 191.25 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES 86603 04/12/2021 20210705 382.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 12 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES 86605 04/12/2021 20210705 2,167.50 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES 86606 04/12/2021 20210705 625.00 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES 86604 04/12/2021 20210705 3,442.50 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES 86123 02/09/2021 20210705 765.00 CHECK 458957 TOTAL: 23,761.25 458958 05/07/2021 PRTD 160062 ELM CREEK BREWING COMPANY E-1005 04/15/2021 20210705 136.00 CHECK 458958 TOTAL: 136.00 458959 05/07/2021 PRTD 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 2246717 04/06/2021 20210705 114.75 CHECK 458959 TOTAL: 114.75 458960 05/07/2021 PRTD 134486 ENNIS-FLINT 252787 11/24/2020 20210705 309.88 CHECK 458960 TOTAL: 309.88 458961 05/07/2021 PRTD 100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC BB1586 04/05/2021 20210705 6,484.00 CHECK 458961 TOTAL: 6,484.00 458962 05/07/2021 PRTD 100146 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-412700 04/05/2021 20210705 37.82 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-412696 04/05/2021 20210705 99.30 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-412945 04/07/2021 20210705 20.46 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-412638 04/05/2021 20210705 137.03 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-6850840 04/06/2021 20210705 10.38 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-412880 04/06/2021 20210705 380.20 CHECK 458962 TOTAL: 685.19 458963 05/07/2021 PRTD 147181 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-3227 04/21/2021 20210705 210.00 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-3226 04/21/2021 20210705 390.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 13 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 458963 TOTAL: 600.00 458964 05/07/2021 PRTD 116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE INC 745026221 04/09/2021 20210705 221.98 FINANCE AND COMMERCE INC 745026220 04/09/2021 20210705 229.24 CHECK 458964 TOTAL: 451.22 458965 05/07/2021 PRTD 160036 FIRST HOSPITAL LABORATORIES, INC. FL00415963 01/07/2021 20210705 1,227.04 CHECK 458965 TOTAL: 1,227.04 458966 05/07/2021 PRTD 105066 FITTING REFLECTIONS LLC 3097 04/11/2021 20210705 915.00 FITTING REFLECTIONS LLC 3098 04/11/2021 20210705 1,225.00 CHECK 458966 TOTAL: 2,140.00 458967 05/07/2021 PRTD 102456 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1330733 04/06/2021 20210705 49.99 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC 018087367 04/07/2021 20210705 -49.99 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1331822 04/07/2021 20210705 20.99 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1333557 04/09/2021 20210705 18.98 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1334640 04/12/2021 20210705 91.68 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1334685 04/12/2021 20210705 6.99 CHECK 458967 TOTAL: 138.64 458968 05/07/2021 PRTD 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION INC W12665 04/08/2021 20210705 356.00 CHECK 458968 TOTAL: 356.00 458969 05/07/2021 PRTD 101931 HANESBRANDS INC 41816662 04/12/2021 20210705 737.18 HANESBRANDS INC 41815329 04/06/2021 20210705 2,910.41 HANESBRANDS INC 41815271 04/06/2021 20210705 534.62 CHECK 458969 TOTAL: 4,182.21 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 14 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 458970 05/07/2021 PRTD 144412 WINEBOW MN00093009 04/16/2021 20210705 471.00 WINEBOW MN00093133 04/20/2021 20210705 1,758.00 WINEBOW MN00093131 04/20/2021 20210705 1,600.00 WINEBOW MN00093149 04/20/2021 20210705 1,600.00 WINEBOW MN00093150 04/20/2021 20210705 1,287.00 WINEBOW MN00093147 04/20/2021 20210705 163.75 WINEBOW MN00093146 04/20/2021 20210705 1,600.00 WINEBOW MN00093148 04/20/2021 20210705 784.27 WINEBOW MN00093660 04/29/2021 20210705 -118.50 CHECK 458970 TOTAL: 9,145.52 458971 05/07/2021 PRTD 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 9320911316 04/09/2021 20210705 14,888.90 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 9320914473 04/09/2021 20210705 21.14 CHECK 458971 TOTAL: 14,910.04 458972 05/07/2021 PRTD 122093 GROUP HEALTHPLAN INC 104250848 04/09/2021 20210705 22,986.80 CHECK 458972 TOTAL: 22,986.80 458973 05/07/2021 PRTD 100797 HAWKINS INC 4911666 04/06/2021 20210705 4,821.50 HAWKINS INC 4914679 04/09/2021 20210705 5,117.10 CHECK 458973 TOTAL: 9,938.60 458974 05/07/2021 PRTD 143563 HEADFLYER BREWING E-2716 04/13/2021 20210705 311.00 CHECK 458974 TOTAL: 311.00 458975 05/07/2021 PRTD 101503 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY TAX 6792 03/25/2021 20210705 48,226.53 CHECK 458975 TOTAL: 48,226.53 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 15 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 458976 05/07/2021 PRTD 103085 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000164566 04/05/2021 20210705 1,816.70 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000164521 04/05/2021 20210705 2,209.50 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000164522 04/05/2021 20210705 3,154.37 CHECK 458976 TOTAL: 7,180.57 458977 05/07/2021 PRTD 100805 HIRSHFIELDS INC 03374963 04/12/2021 20210705 27.48 CHECK 458977 TOTAL: 27.48 458978 05/07/2021 PRTD 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC 403474 04/20/2021 20210705 1,371.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 403475 04/20/2021 20210705 72.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 403278 04/20/2021 20210705 72.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 403471 04/20/2021 20210705 1,012.50 HOHENSTEINS INC 403511 04/20/2021 20210705 1,228.50 HOHENSTEINS INC 403473 04/20/2021 20210705 -163.88 CHECK 458978 TOTAL: 3,592.12 458979 05/07/2021 PRTD 147145 HOLIDAY STATIONSTORES LLC 8420 04/05/2021 20210705 88.21 CHECK 458979 TOTAL: 88.21 458980 05/07/2021 PRTD 100417 HORIZON CHEMICAL CO 210308101-ER 03/06/2021 20210705 448.88 HORIZON CHEMICAL CO 210412067-ER 04/12/2021 20210705 475.90 CHECK 458980 TOTAL: 924.78 458981 05/07/2021 PRTD 116680 HP INC 9011047168 12/03/2020 20210705 1,173.15 CHECK 458981 TOTAL: 1,173.15 458982 05/07/2021 PRTD 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 99690 04/20/2021 20210705 440.75 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 99691 04/21/2021 20210705 545.20 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 99692 04/21/2021 20210705 370.60 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 16 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 458982 TOTAL: 1,356.55 458983 05/07/2021 PRTD 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORPORATION INV249124 04/07/2021 20210705 93.32 INDELCO PLASTICS CORPORATION INV249875 04/09/2021 20210705 464.15 CHECK 458983 TOTAL: 557.47 458984 05/07/2021 PRTD 150898 INVICTUS BREWING INC 2799 04/20/2021 20210705 93.00 INVICTUS BREWING INC 2798 04/19/2021 20210705 117.00 INVICTUS BREWING INC 2801 04/20/2021 20210705 257.00 CHECK 458984 TOTAL: 467.00 458985 05/07/2021 PRTD 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC 180011 04/06/2021 20210705 68.00 CHECK 458985 TOTAL: 68.00 458986 05/07/2021 PRTD 160041 JINX TEA, LLC 1199 04/21/2021 20210705 94.10 JINX TEA, LLC 1201 04/22/2021 20210705 94.10 CHECK 458986 TOTAL: 188.20 458987 05/07/2021 PRTD 100741 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3179245 04/21/2021 20210705 1,561.36 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3179248 04/21/2021 20210705 2,979.55 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3179246 04/21/2021 20210705 445.00 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3179247 04/21/2021 20210705 83.10 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3179249 04/21/2021 20210705 5,375.95 CHECK 458987 TOTAL: 10,444.96 458988 05/07/2021 PRTD 100835 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3468639 04/15/2021 20210705 2,153.95 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3468640 04/15/2021 20210705 186.80 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3468642 04/15/2021 20210705 106.00 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3468641 04/15/2021 20210705 2,156.25 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 17 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3468637 04/15/2021 20210705 1,697.50 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3468638 04/15/2021 20210705 106.80 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3469783 04/22/2021 20210705 1,480.25 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3469785 04/22/2021 20210705 120.00 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3469784 04/22/2021 20210705 3,368.20 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3469787 04/22/2021 20210705 120.00 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3469786 04/22/2021 20210705 1,895.30 CHECK 458988 TOTAL: 13,391.05 458989 05/07/2021 PRTD 100835 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6189583 04/15/2021 20210705 61.80 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6189585 04/15/2021 20210705 1,473.71 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6189584 04/15/2021 20210705 1,863.99 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6189581 04/15/2021 20210705 1,697.85 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6189580 04/15/2021 20210705 1,131.90 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6189579 04/15/2021 20210705 109.09 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6189578 04/15/2021 20210705 1,024.59 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6189577 04/15/2021 20210705 1,289.04 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6189590 04/15/2021 20210705 73.19 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6189589 04/15/2021 20210705 383.26 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6189588 04/15/2021 20210705 1,871.61 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6189582 04/15/2021 20210705 1,697.85 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6193009 04/22/2021 20210705 1,258.09 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6193010 04/22/2021 20210705 1,097.11 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6193014 04/22/2021 20210705 1,573.38 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6193008 04/22/2021 20210705 920.90 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6193013 04/22/2021 20210705 1,005.29 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 18 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6193011 04/22/2021 20210705 2,644.78 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6193007 04/22/2021 20210705 41.19 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6193006 04/22/2021 20210705 1,008.39 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6193005 04/22/2021 20210705 263.76 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6193263 04/22/2021 20210705 507.50 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6193020 04/22/2021 20210705 1,400.28 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6193021 04/22/2021 20210705 1,403.49 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6193023 04/22/2021 20210705 1,535.53 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6193022 04/22/2021 20210705 73.19 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6193019 04/22/2021 20210705 1,005.29 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6193018 04/22/2021 20210705 920.90 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 630109 04/23/2021 20210705 -93.30 CHECK 458989 TOTAL: 29,243.65 458990 05/07/2021 PRTD 100835 WINE MERCHANTS 7325735 04/15/2021 20210705 48.38 WINE MERCHANTS 7325736 04/15/2021 20210705 2,421.14 WINE MERCHANTS 7325734 04/15/2021 20210705 656.14 WINE MERCHANTS 7325733 04/15/2021 20210705 162.38 WINE MERCHANTS 7325739 04/15/2021 20210705 3,615.80 WINE MERCHANTS 7325738 04/15/2021 20210705 72.57 WINE MERCHANTS 7325737 04/15/2021 20210705 821.42 WINE MERCHANTS 7326604 04/22/2021 20210705 70.57 WINE MERCHANTS 7326608 04/22/2021 20210705 1,162.61 WINE MERCHANTS 7326605 04/22/2021 20210705 1,131.90 WINE MERCHANTS 7326606 04/22/2021 20210705 1,791.47 WINE MERCHANTS 7326607 04/22/2021 20210705 2,564.23 WINE MERCHANTS 7326602 04/22/2021 20210705 1,520.71 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 19 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET WINE MERCHANTS 7326603 04/22/2021 20210705 183.57 WINE MERCHANTS 7326611 04/22/2021 20210705 3,280.23 WINE MERCHANTS 7326610 04/22/2021 20210705 183.57 WINE MERCHANTS 7326609 04/22/2021 20210705 70.57 CHECK 458990 TOTAL: 19,757.26 458991 05/07/2021 PRTD 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1781619 04/15/2021 20210705 3,512.71 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1781614 04/15/2021 20210705 2,244.83 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1781613 04/15/2021 20210705 2,218.96 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1781616 04/15/2021 20210705 75.04 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1781618 04/15/2021 20210705 75.69 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1781611 04/15/2021 20210705 81.19 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1781607 04/15/2021 20210705 457.07 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1781612 04/15/2021 20210705 420.39 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1781615 04/15/2021 20210705 302.33 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1781608 04/15/2021 20210705 588.10 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1781609 04/15/2021 20210705 133.19 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1781626 04/15/2021 20210705 701.14 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1781624 04/15/2021 20210705 1,573.37 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1781623 04/15/2021 20210705 1,008.09 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1781625 04/15/2021 20210705 561.47 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1781622 04/15/2021 20210705 1,493.09 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1781610 04/15/2021 20210705 228.31 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1781606 04/15/2021 20210705 450.95 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1781605 04/15/2021 20210705 43.19 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1781604 04/15/2021 20210705 237.29 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 20 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1781603 04/15/2021 20210705 669.60 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1781602 04/15/2021 20210705 54.99 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1781601 04/15/2021 20210705 49.19 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1781627 04/19/2021 20210705 4,420.18 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1786110 04/22/2021 20210705 289.26 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1786116 04/22/2021 20210705 1,810.18 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1786107 04/22/2021 20210705 1,636.49 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1786113 04/22/2021 20210705 1,269.41 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1786112 04/22/2021 20210705 963.83 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1786117 04/22/2021 20210705 1,118.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1786118 04/22/2021 20210705 240.95 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1786114 04/22/2021 20210705 1,512.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1786115 04/22/2021 20210705 955.90 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1786109 04/22/2021 20210705 124.57 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1786108 04/22/2021 20210705 334.42 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1786105 04/22/2021 20210705 233.28 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1786104 04/22/2021 20210705 299.01 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1786103 04/22/2021 20210705 592.90 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1786102 04/22/2021 20210705 58.79 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1786127 04/22/2021 20210705 1,352.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1786111 04/22/2021 20210705 124.57 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1786106 04/22/2021 20210705 161.19 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1786126 04/22/2021 20210705 707.14 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1786129 04/22/2021 20210705 58.38 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1786128 04/22/2021 20210705 498.28 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1786125 04/22/2021 20210705 2,107.83 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 21 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1786124 04/22/2021 20210705 489.58 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1786123 04/22/2021 20210705 203.45 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1786122 04/22/2021 20210705 1,647.51 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1786121 04/22/2021 20210705 556.76 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 143994 04/16/2021 20210705 -132.00 CHECK 458991 TOTAL: 40,814.84 458992 05/07/2021 PRTD 141864 JOSEPH E JOHNSON & SONS CONSTRUCT 1140 03/26/2021 20210705 6,000.00 CHECK 458992 TOTAL: 6,000.00 458993 05/07/2021 PRTD 103409 KELBRO COMPANY 2611404 04/15/2021 20210705 53.52 KELBRO COMPANY 2611460 04/15/2021 20210705 105.69 CHECK 458993 TOTAL: 159.21 458994 05/07/2021 PRTD 124002 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 18606642 03/31/2021 20210705 45,977.40 CHECK 458994 TOTAL: 45,977.40 458995 05/07/2021 PRTD 100944 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 24546 04/22/2021 20210705 1,576.75 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 124537 04/21/2021 20210705 308.50 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 124538 04/21/2021 20210705 396.00 CHECK 458995 TOTAL: 2,281.25 458996 05/07/2021 PRTD 100944 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 123811 04/14/2021 20210705 731.25 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 124547 04/22/2021 20210705 1,532.50 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 124548 04/22/2021 20210705 1,226.00 CHECK 458996 TOTAL: 3,489.75 458997 05/07/2021 PRTD 144835 KNECHT'S NURSERIES AND LANDSCAPIN 04072021 04/07/2021 20210705 654.95 KNECHT'S NURSERIES AND LANDSCAPIN 18596 04/08/2021 20210705 59.99 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 22 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 458997 TOTAL: 714.94 458998 05/07/2021 PRTD 151024 LA DONA SBC 4662 04/21/2021 20210705 70.00 LA DONA SBC 4661 04/21/2021 20210705 112.00 CHECK 458998 TOTAL: 182.00 458999 05/07/2021 PRTD 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9308352070 04/06/2021 20210705 438.50 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9308367134 04/12/2021 20210705 829.74 CHECK 458999 TOTAL: 1,268.24 459000 05/07/2021 PRTD 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 40002183 04/21 04/07/2021 20210705 929.00 CHECK 459000 TOTAL: 929.00 459001 05/07/2021 PRTD 135867 LIBATION PROJECT 34985 04/20/2021 20210705 388.50 LIBATION PROJECT 34984 04/20/2021 20210705 129.50 LIBATION PROJECT 34983 04/20/2021 20210705 129.50 CHECK 459001 TOTAL: 647.50 459002 05/07/2021 PRTD 101146 LINGO - FORMERLY IMPACT 608783540 03/16/2021 20210705 98.43 CHECK 459002 TOTAL: 98.43 459003 05/07/2021 PRTD 101078 LUBE-TECH 2587435 04/07/2021 20210705 25.00 CHECK 459003 TOTAL: 25.00 459004 05/07/2021 PRTD 146427 LUCID BREWING LLC 10200 04/15/2021 20210705 192.00 LUCID BREWING LLC 10256 04/20/2021 20210705 284.00 LUCID BREWING LLC 10255 04/20/2021 20210705 150.00 CHECK 459004 TOTAL: 626.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 23 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 459005 05/07/2021 PRTD 141916 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 36554 04/21/2021 20210705 470.00 CHECK 459005 TOTAL: 470.00 459006 05/07/2021 PRTD 141215 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV571314 04/20/2021 20210705 273.48 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV571337 04/20/2021 20210705 273.48 CHECK 459006 TOTAL: 546.96 459007 05/07/2021 PRTD 130477 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 577276 04/21/2021 20210705 803.60 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 577283 04/21/2021 20210705 2,028.40 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 577280 04/21/2021 20210705 42.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 577287 04/22/2021 20210705 1,344.80 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 577286 04/21/2021 20210705 52.00 CHECK 459007 TOTAL: 4,270.80 459008 05/07/2021 PRTD 121441 MED ALLIANCE GROUP INC 210077 04/09/2021 20210705 6,081.90 CHECK 459008 TOTAL: 6,081.90 459009 05/07/2021 PRTD 101483 MENARDS INC 36994 04/06/2021 20210705 28.93 MENARDS INC 36991 04/06/2021 20210705 60.85 MENARDS INC 37189 04/09/2021 20210705 172.05 MENARDS INC 37192 04/09/2021 20210705 60.47 MENARDS INC 37279 04/10/2021 20210705 6.24 MENARDS INC 37063 04/07/2021 20210705 2.85 MENARDS INC 37059 04/07/2021 20210705 65.76 MENARDS INC 37344 04/12/2021 20210705 15.33 CHECK 459009 TOTAL: 412.48 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 24 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 459010 05/07/2021 PRTD 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD LLC 523389 04/07/2021 20210705 46.67 CHECK 459010 TOTAL: 46.67 459011 05/07/2021 PRTD 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WA 36200 04/08/2021 20210705 2,535.00 CHECK 459011 TOTAL: 2,535.00 459012 05/07/2021 PRTD 144364 MINNESOTA DRIVERS & VEHICLE SERVI 7502 04/02/2021 20210705 16.00 MINNESOTA DRIVERS & VEHICLE SERVI 9864 05/03/2021 20210705 14.25 CHECK 459012 TOTAL: 30.25 459013 05/07/2021 PRTD 101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENC 10000113641 03/22/2021 20210705 62.50 CHECK 459013 TOTAL: 62.50 459014 05/07/2021 PRTD 103944 MOBILE HEALTH SERVICES LLC 39143 03/31/2021 20210705 8,640.00 CHECK 459014 TOTAL: 8,640.00 459015 05/07/2021 PRTD 150705 MOBILE MINI INC 9010298671 04/09/2021 20210705 208.51 CHECK 459015 TOTAL: 208.51 459016 05/07/2021 PRTD 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC E-21112 04/20/2021 20210705 376.00 MODIST BREWING LLC E-21114 04/20/2021 20210705 753.00 MODIST BREWING LLC E-21113 04/20/2021 20210705 502.00 CHECK 459016 TOTAL: 1,631.00 459017 05/07/2021 PRTD 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1295673-00 04/12/2021 20210705 997.86 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1294808-00 04/05/2021 20210705 66.05 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1295300-00 04/07/2021 20210705 58.70 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1295509-00 04/09/2021 20210705 167.88 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1295533-00 04/09/2021 20210705 659.38 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 25 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1295709-00 04/09/2021 20210705 173.46 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1295343-00 04/07/2021 20210705 9.22 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1295674-00 04/09/2021 20210705 294.40 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1289325-00 04/30/2021 20210705 -1,603.13 CHECK 459017 TOTAL: 823.82 459018 05/07/2021 PRTD 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 172777 04/21/2021 20210705 1,096.00 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 172778 04/21/2021 20210705 1,646.00 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 172775 04/21/2021 20210705 2,184.00 CHECK 459018 TOTAL: 4,926.00 459019 05/07/2021 PRTD 142821 NICKLASSON ATHLETIC COMPANY 66-2637 03/01/2021 20210705 588.00 CHECK 459019 TOTAL: 588.00 459020 05/07/2021 PRTD 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPPLY 484111 04/09/2021 20210705 231.46 CHECK 459020 TOTAL: 231.46 459021 05/07/2021 PRTD 136562 NORTHLAND RECREATION LLC 2283 04/12/2021 20210705 2,062.50 CHECK 459021 TOTAL: 2,062.50 459022 05/07/2021 PRTD 141965 OMNI BREWING COMPANY LLC E-9577 04/19/2021 20210705 156.00 OMNI BREWING COMPANY LLC E-9602 04/20/2021 20210705 194.00 OMNI BREWING COMPANY LLC E-9603 04/20/2021 20210705 101.00 CHECK 459022 TOTAL: 451.00 459023 05/07/2021 PRTD 999995 CRAIG SANDBERG ED179430-Refund 04/29/2020 20210705 2,500.00 CHECK 459023 TOTAL: 2,500.00 459024 05/07/2021 PRTD 999995 SCHERBER CO ED184424-REFUND 04/27/2021 20210705 2,500.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 26 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 459024 TOTAL: 2,500.00 459025 05/07/2021 PRTD 999995 TRINITY EXTERIORS ED187079-Refund 04/29/2021 20210705 255.80 CHECK 459025 TOTAL: 255.80 459026 05/07/2021 PRTD 999994 ANDREW NELSON 9482 04/27/2021 20210705 120.00 CHECK 459026 TOTAL: 120.00 459027 05/07/2021 PRTD 999994 CAROL ENGSTROM 9791 04/30/2021 20210705 250.00 CHECK 459027 TOTAL: 250.00 459028 05/07/2021 PRTD 999994 ELIZABETH WINDLER 9743 04/29/2021 20210705 55.00 CHECK 459028 TOTAL: 55.00 459029 05/07/2021 PRTD 999994 JERRY BETHEL 9987 05/04/2021 20210705 100.00 CHECK 459029 TOTAL: 100.00 459030 05/07/2021 PRTD 999994 MEGAN BIRELEY 8978 04/22/2021 20210705 194.00 CHECK 459030 TOTAL: 194.00 459031 05/07/2021 PRTD 999994 MINNESOTA REVENUE 9727 04/29/2020 20210705 929.00 CHECK 459031 TOTAL: 929.00 459032 05/07/2021 PRTD 999994 VERLA BAYARD 9792 04/30/2021 20210705 62.50 CHECK 459032 TOTAL: 62.50 459033 05/07/2021 PRTD 999996 CHARITY BRADSETH 8973 04/22/2021 20210705 80.64 CHECK 459033 TOTAL: 80.64 459034 05/07/2021 PRTD 999996 EMILY REICHENBACH 9362 04/26/2021 20210705 250.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 27 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 459034 TOTAL: 250.00 459035 05/07/2021 PRTD 999996 GRETHE DILLON 9006 04/23/2021 20210705 295.69 CHECK 459035 TOTAL: 295.69 459036 05/07/2021 PRTD 999996 JULIE GULLICKSON 8369 04/14/2021 20210705 247.31 CHECK 459036 TOTAL: 247.31 459037 05/07/2021 PRTD 999996 KIM MCGUIRE 8796 04/22/2021 20210705 37.64 CHECK 459037 TOTAL: 37.64 459038 05/07/2021 PRTD 999996 KRUTI SHUKLA 9445 04/27/2021 20210705 60.00 CHECK 459038 TOTAL: 60.00 459039 05/07/2021 PRTD 999996 MELANIE BERG 9834 05/03/2021 20210705 30.00 CHECK 459039 TOTAL: 30.00 459040 05/07/2021 PRTD 999996 MOLLY HEINZ 8976 04/22/2021 20210705 10.00 CHECK 459040 TOTAL: 10.00 459041 05/07/2021 PRTD 999996 NICHOLE MCKIM 9361 04/26/2021 20210705 139.00 CHECK 459041 TOTAL: 139.00 459042 05/07/2021 PRTD 999996 ROTH JOANNA 9466 04/27/2021 20210705 113.00 CHECK 459042 TOTAL: 113.00 459043 05/07/2021 PRTD 999996 RUTHANN METZGER 9533 04/28/2021 20210705 40.00 CHECK 459043 TOTAL: 40.00 459044 05/07/2021 PRTD 999996 RUTHANN METZGER 9534 04/28/2021 20210705 10.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 28 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 459044 TOTAL: 10.00 459045 05/07/2021 PRTD 999996 TIMBUR WULF 8752 04/21/2021 20210705 30.00 CHECK 459045 TOTAL: 30.00 459046 05/07/2021 PRTD 999996 TRACY WANG 9464 04/27/2021 20210705 134.00 CHECK 459046 TOTAL: 134.00 459047 05/07/2021 PRTD 149249 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-98318 04/15/2021 20210705 424.00 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-98319 04/15/2021 20210705 307.50 CHECK 459047 TOTAL: 731.50 459048 05/07/2021 PRTD 100119 PING INC 15636558 04/06/2021 20210705 126.70 PING INC 15650187 04/12/2021 20210705 126.70 CHECK 459048 TOTAL: 253.40 459049 05/07/2021 PRTD 100954 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL COMPANY 01CD3730 04/09/2021 20210705 2,318.84 CHECK 459049 TOTAL: 2,318.84 459050 05/07/2021 PRTD 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 7016052 04/08/2021 20210705 48.55 CHECK 459050 TOTAL: 48.55 459051 05/07/2021 PRTD 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 210522988 04/07/2021 20210705 1,180.00 CHECK 459051 TOTAL: 1,180.00 459052 05/07/2021 PRTD 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC 318083070 04/06/2021 20210705 61.29 CHECK 459052 TOTAL: 61.29 459053 05/07/2021 PRTD 143618 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-21627 04/19/2021 20210705 256.00 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-21785 04/21/2021 20210705 450.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 29 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 459053 TOTAL: 706.00 459054 05/07/2021 PRTD 100975 MULTI SERVICE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTION 20210410033928 04/10/2021 20210705 288.98 CHECK 459054 TOTAL: 288.98 459055 05/07/2021 PRTD 134832 RICHFIELD BLACKTOP & CONCRETE 5489 04/05/2021 20210705 1,035.00 CHECK 459055 TOTAL: 1,035.00 459056 05/07/2021 PRTD 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 1928507893 04/07/2021 20210705 149.97 CHECK 459056 TOTAL: 149.97 459057 05/07/2021 PRTD 100980 ROBERT B HILL COMPANY 389531 04/07/2021 20210705 201.44 CHECK 459057 TOTAL: 201.44 459058 05/07/2021 PRTD 101659 ORKIN 209738886 04/06/2021 20210705 142.36 CHECK 459058 TOTAL: 142.36 459059 05/07/2021 PRTD 100988 SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMS INC 85692889-2101308094 04/08/2021 20210705 175.00 CHECK 459059 TOTAL: 175.00 459060 05/07/2021 PRTD 100988 SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMS INC 85692889 04/12/2021 20210705 175.00 CHECK 459060 TOTAL: 175.00 459061 05/07/2021 PRTD 100991 SCHWAB VOLLHABER LUBRATT SERVICE INV158490 04/09/2021 20210705 1,142.00 CHECK 459061 TOTAL: 1,142.00 459062 05/07/2021 PRTD 160074 TRICOR DIRECT INC 9346388141 04/05/2021 20210705 623.49 CHECK 459062 TOTAL: 623.49 459063 05/07/2021 PRTD 100995 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 402819 04/09/2021 20210705 123,287.37 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 402915 04/12/2021 20210705 12,939.54 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 30 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 459063 TOTAL: 136,226.91 459064 05/07/2021 PRTD 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 107625456-001 04/05/2021 20210705 132.44 CHECK 459064 TOTAL: 132.44 459065 05/07/2021 PRTD 132195 SMALL LOT MN MN42039 04/20/2021 20210705 92.96 CHECK 459065 TOTAL: 92.96 459066 05/07/2021 PRTD 104928 SMITH CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC 19657 04/12/2021 20210705 108.57 CHECK 459066 TOTAL: 108.57 459067 05/07/2021 PRTD 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL ARV/47655867 04/09/2021 20210705 491.12 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL ARV/47676581 04/12/2021 20210705 197.37 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL ARV/47676583 04/12/2021 20210705 44.95 CHECK 459067 TOTAL: 733.44 459068 05/07/2021 PRTD 150892 SOLAR SOLUTIONS INC 11902 04/11/2021 20210705 2,281.39 CHECK 459068 TOTAL: 2,281.39 459069 05/07/2021 PRTD 101023 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSI 202107 04/06/2021 20210705 11,043.00 CHECK 459069 TOTAL: 11,043.00 459070 05/07/2021 PRTD 134700 SPOK INC E0319246P 04/07/2021 20210705 132.49 CHECK 459070 TOTAL: 132.49 459071 05/07/2021 PRTD 101004 SPS COMPANIES INC S4450836.001 04/07/2021 20210705 64.72 CHECK 459071 TOTAL: 64.72 459072 05/07/2021 PRTD 105842 MINER, LTD 782873 04/05/2021 20210705 324.50 CHECK 459072 TOTAL: 324.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 31 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 459073 05/07/2021 PRTD 139006 OFFICE OF MINT SERVICES W21030572 04/14/2021 20210705 4,173.47 OFFICE OF MINT SERVICES W21030575 04/14/2021 20210705 299.40 CHECK 459073 TOTAL: 4,472.87 459074 05/07/2021 PRTD 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 39609 04/21/2021 20210705 381.00 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 39608 04/21/2021 20210705 219.00 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 39607 04/21/2021 20210705 279.00 CHECK 459074 TOTAL: 879.00 459075 05/07/2021 PRTD 101015 STREICHERS INC I1494933 04/05/2021 20210705 57.00 STREICHERS INC I1498483 04/21/2021 20210705 86.97 STREICHERS INC I1498628 04/21/2021 20210705 1,533.50 CHECK 459075 TOTAL: 1,677.47 459076 05/07/2021 PRTD 160081 GREAT CIRCLE VENTURES HOLDINGS, L 1022945 02/24/2021 20210705 1,361.75 CHECK 459076 TOTAL: 1,361.75 459077 05/07/2021 PRTD 151143 TALKING WATERS BREWING CO LLC 2110 04/21/2021 20210705 210.00 TALKING WATERS BREWING CO LLC 2112 04/21/2021 20210705 210.00 TALKING WATERS BREWING CO LLC 2111 04/21/2021 20210705 210.00 CHECK 459077 TOTAL: 630.00 459078 05/07/2021 PRTD 104932 TAYLOR MADE 34837676 03/16/2021 20210705 402.18 CHECK 459078 TOTAL: 402.18 459079 05/07/2021 PRTD 111002 TEE JAY NORTH INC 40156 04/06/2021 20210705 267.25 CHECK 459079 TOTAL: 267.25 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 32 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 459080 05/07/2021 PRTD 146870 TERRY'S HARDWARE 306396/1 04/07/2021 20210705 5,840.00 TERRY'S HARDWARE 306397/1 04/07/2021 20210705 747.84 CHECK 459080 TOTAL: 6,587.84 459081 05/07/2021 PRTD 134673 TOTAL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INC S1029 04/08/2021 20210705 1,416.18 TOTAL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INC S1027 04/08/2021 20210705 2,121.96 TOTAL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INC PM4015 04/11/2021 20210705 2,554.00 CHECK 459081 TOTAL: 6,092.14 459082 05/07/2021 PRTD 136342 TRAVISMATHEW LLC 90206511 04/12/2021 20210705 119.17 CHECK 459082 TOTAL: 119.17 459083 05/07/2021 PRTD 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO 49040 04/07/2021 20210705 355.05 CHECK 459083 TOTAL: 355.05 459084 05/07/2021 PRTD 146436 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC 045-335910 04/09/2021 20210705 1,400.00 CHECK 459084 TOTAL: 1,400.00 459085 05/07/2021 PRTD 122362 UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE SPI-922B06-13 04/06/2021 20210705 1,295.00 UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE SPI-922B06-15 04/21/2021 20210705 1,295.00 CHECK 459085 TOTAL: 2,590.00 459086 05/07/2021 PRTD 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 567143 04/08/2021 20210705 186.71 CHECK 459086 TOTAL: 186.71 459087 05/07/2021 PRTD 144209 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 2476 04/15/2021 20210705 157.50 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 2475 04/15/2021 20210705 121.50 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 2483 04/22/2021 20210705 175.50 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 2481 04/21/2021 20210705 171.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 33 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 2482 04/22/2021 20210705 171.00 CHECK 459087 TOTAL: 796.50 459088 05/07/2021 PRTD 148579 VIERKANT DISPOSAL LLC 3/1/21-3/31/21 04/08/2021 20210705 67,985.00 CHECK 459088 TOTAL: 67,985.00 459089 05/07/2021 PRTD 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S004573211.001 04/05/2021 20210705 9.74 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S004584212.001 04/07/2021 20210705 9.74 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S004588753.001 04/08/2021 20210705 97.40 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S004588732.001 04/09/2021 20210705 184.18 CHECK 459089 TOTAL: 301.06 459090 05/07/2021 PRTD 144654 VINEYARD VINES LLC 1192486 04/06/2021 20210705 259.13 CHECK 459090 TOTAL: 259.13 459091 05/07/2021 PRTD 119454 VINOCOPIA INC 0277284-IN 04/15/2021 20210705 1,210.25 VINOCOPIA INC 0277261-IN 04/15/2021 20210705 453.00 VINOCOPIA INC 0277262-IN 04/15/2021 20210705 355.25 VINOCOPIA INC 0277286-IN 04/15/2021 20210705 1,118.58 VINOCOPIA INC 0277259-IN 04/15/2021 20210705 169.00 VINOCOPIA INC 0277257-IN 04/15/2021 20210705 169.00 VINOCOPIA INC 0277258-IN 04/15/2021 20210705 161.25 VINOCOPIA INC 0277289-IN 04/15/2021 20210705 1,082.75 VINOCOPIA INC 0277633-IN 04/22/2021 20210705 153.50 VINOCOPIA INC 0277611-IN 04/22/2021 20210705 129.00 VINOCOPIA INC 0277610-IN 04/22/2021 20210705 338.25 VINOCOPIA INC 0277635-IN 04/22/2021 20210705 121.50 VINOCOPIA INC 0277634-IN 04/22/2021 20210705 226.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 34 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 459091 TOTAL: 5,687.83 459092 05/07/2021 PRTD 124959 W.L. HALL COMPANY 8386 04/07/2021 20210705 2,466.00 CHECK 459092 TOTAL: 2,466.00 459093 05/07/2021 PRTD 102886 WAGNER GREENHOUSES INC 42928 04/12/2021 20210705 293.66 CHECK 459093 TOTAL: 293.66 459094 05/07/2021 PRTD 120784 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 15948 04/06/2021 20210705 3,350.00 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 16022 04/06/2021 20210705 228.42 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 16026 04/06/2021 20210705 148.36 CHECK 459094 TOTAL: 3,726.78 459095 05/07/2021 PRTD 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 8469226-2282-0 04/05/2021 20210705 211.58 CHECK 459095 TOTAL: 211.58 459096 05/07/2021 PRTD 101033 WINE COMPANY 169881 04/21/2021 20210705 1,325.45 WINE COMPANY 169883 04/21/2021 20210705 149.00 WINE COMPANY 169882 04/21/2021 20210705 2,424.55 WINE COMPANY 169884 04/21/2021 20210705 2,064.82 CHECK 459096 TOTAL: 5,963.82 459097 05/07/2021 PRTD 124503 WINSUPPLY EDEN PRAIRIE MN CO 208782 01 04/09/2021 20210705 82.27 CHECK 459097 TOTAL: 82.27 459098 05/07/2021 PRTD 142162 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 2690 04/16/2021 20210705 221.40 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 2692 04/16/2021 20210705 244.80 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 2691 04/19/2021 20210705 224.10 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 2698 04/22/2021 20210705 334.80 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 35 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 459098 TOTAL: 1,025.10 459099 05/07/2021 PRTD 127774 WORLDWIDE CELLARS INC R21-51279 04/15/2021 20210705 132.04 WORLDWIDE CELLARS INC R21-51278 04/15/2021 20210705 132.04 WORLDWIDE CELLARS INC R21-51343 04/20/2021 20210705 72.04 WORLDWIDE CELLARS INC R21-51344 04/20/2021 20210705 383.08 CHECK 459099 TOTAL: 719.20 459100 05/07/2021 PRTD 100300 WRIGHT COUNTY 7702 04/06/2021 20210705 50.00 CHECK 459100 TOTAL: 50.00 459101 05/07/2021 PRTD 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES R-017423-000-4 04/28/2021 20210705 3,484.00 CHECK 459101 TOTAL: 3,484.00 459102 05/07/2021 PRTD 101103 WW GRAINGER 9859604572 04/06/2021 20210705 529.20 WW GRAINGER 9861600527 04/07/2021 20210705 362.04 WW GRAINGER 982625804 04/08/2021 20210705 469.07 WW GRAINGER 9862625812 04/08/2021 20210705 1,127.12 WW GRAINGER 9862369684 04/08/2021 20210705 41.56 WW GRAINGER 9862826345 04/08/2021 20210705 64.55 WW GRAINGER 9863955622 04/09/2021 20210705 217.80 WW GRAINGER 9863955630 04/09/2021 20210705 319.40 WW GRAINGER 9866311872 04/12/2021 20210705 160.16 WW GRAINGER 9866032809 04/12/2021 20210705 70.77 WW GRAINGER 9865980941 04/12/2021 20210705 1,268.14 CHECK 459102 TOTAL: 4,629.81 459103 05/07/2021 PRTD 103266 YORKDALE SHOPPES PARTNERS, LLC 8584 12/31/2020 20210705 1,156.31 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/06/2021 13:54User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 36 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 459103 TOTAL: 1,156.31 459104 05/07/2021 PRTD 160080 Z COMPANIES, INC. 0010482 04/09/2021 20210705 1,023.00 CHECK 459104 TOTAL: 1,023.00 459105 05/07/2021 PRTD 101091 ZIEGLER INC SI000011794 04/09/2021 20210705 2,568.41 ZIEGLER INC U4158704 01/09/2021 20210705 1,400.00 CHECK 459105 TOTAL: 3,968.41 NUMBER OF CHECKS 216 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** 855,555.12 COUNT AMOUNT TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS 216 855,555.12 *** GRAND TOTAL *** 855,555.12 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 38 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND SUB FUND DUE TO DUE FR 1000 General 91,386.652100 Police Special Revenue 2,539.002100 Police Special Revenue 200.002300 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety 13,231.562500 Conservation & Sustainability 950.002600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 6,823.752600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 22,071.083000 Debt Service 1,000.003000 Debt Service 1,500.003000 Debt Service 1,500.004000 Capital Projects 10,336.074200 Equipment Replacement 23,796.004400 PIR Capital Projects 123.685100 Art Center 272.405200 Braemar Golf Course 50,178.975200 Braemar Golf Course 63.285300 Aquatic Center 989.085400 Edinborough Park 4,155.515500 Braemar Arena 63,841.865600 Braemar Field 957.135700 Centennial Lakes 1,357.175800 Liquor 190,569.325900 Utility Fund 36,212.595900 Utility Fund 3,534.605900 Utility Fund 3,958.006000 Risk Management 21,034.616100 Equipment Operations 37,088.156200 Information Technology 11.506300 Facilities Management 9,611.277100 PS Training Facility 626.407200 MN Task Force 1 5,866.599999 Pooled Cash Fund 605,786.22 TOTAL 605,786.22 605,786.22 ** END OF REPORT - Generated by Lonnia Jefferson ** City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 1 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 459106 05/14/2021 PRTD 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 0167276-IN 04/16/2021 20211405 3,960.79 CHECK 459106 TOTAL: 3,960.79 459107 05/14/2021 PRTD 129458 ACME ELECTRIC MOTOR INC 8624413 04/14/2021 20211405 425.64 ACME ELECTRIC MOTOR INC 8641174 04/19/2021 20211405 209.94 ACME ELECTRIC MOTOR INC 8629424 04/15/2021 20211405 306.70 CHECK 459107 TOTAL: 942.28 459108 05/14/2021 PRTD 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 910753162 04/13/2021 20211405 119.72 ACUSHNET COMPANY 910776533 04/15/2021 20211405 405.14 ACUSHNET COMPANY 910753038 04/13/2021 20211405 2,463.77 CHECK 459108 TOTAL: 2,988.63 459109 05/14/2021 PRTD 143557 ADIDAS AMERICA INC 6153257766 04/18/2021 20211405 7,930.01 CHECK 459109 TOTAL: 7,930.01 459110 05/14/2021 PRTD 140318 ADVANCED ELEMENTS, INC 73715 04/13/2021 20211405 9,781.55 CHECK 459110 TOTAL: 9,781.55 459111 05/14/2021 PRTD 151095 KELLEY BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION INC 16670 04/05/2021 20211405 428.50 KELLEY BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION INC 16691 04/05/2021 20211405 259.00 CHECK 459111 TOTAL: 687.50 459112 05/14/2021 PRTD 101166 AHEAD INC INV0476561 04/14/2021 20211405 482.83 AHEAD INC INV0476384 04/13/2021 20211405 663.26 CHECK 459112 TOTAL: 1,146.09 459113 05/14/2021 PRTD 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 11PX-NPH6-7GWD 04/13/2021 20211405 63.64 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1TCM-C4LK-KQJC 04/14/2021 20211405 42.96 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 17LG-WJFC-1D6N 04/14/2021 20211405 27.60 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 2 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1FT1-FT7K-K43L 04/15/2021 20211405 59.94 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 17MC-KQ7R-X7DX 04/16/2021 20211405 12.10 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1C3G-L49J-TKNT 04/16/2021 20211405 134.84 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 143L-WCMG-VWCM 04/17/2021 20211405 37.36 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 13XL-347G-LDTN 04/18/2021 20211405 154.75 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 11HC-DLGX-9D67 04/18/2021 20211405 115.18 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1QR4-LF7F-3F16 04/18/2021 20211405 389.90 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1KKX-QWTV-DRKG 04/19/2021 20211405 193.27 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1QR4-LF7F-VKN3 04/19/2021 20211405 54.95 CHECK 459113 TOTAL: 1,286.49 459114 05/14/2021 PRTD 118491 APPLE INC AE41564602 04/13/2021 20211405 1,495.00 CHECK 459114 TOTAL: 1,495.00 459115 05/14/2021 PRTD 151441 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 1005032983 04/19/2021 20211405 204.18 CHECK 459115 TOTAL: 204.18 459116 05/14/2021 PRTD 151756 ARBEITER BREWING COMPANY LLC 257 04/23/2021 20211405 180.00 CHECK 459116 TOTAL: 180.00 459117 05/14/2021 PRTD 142465 THE ARBITRAGE GROUP INC 84510 03/31/2021 20211405 1,000.00 THE ARBITRAGE GROUP INC 84511 03/31/2021 20211405 1,000.00 THE ARBITRAGE GROUP INC 84512 03/31/2021 20211405 1,500.00 THE ARBITRAGE GROUP INC 84513 03/31/2021 20211405 1,500.00 CHECK 459117 TOTAL: 5,000.00 459118 05/14/2021 PRTD 102113 AUDRANN INC 1306805 04/07/2021 20211405 69.07 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 3 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 459118 TOTAL: 69.07 459119 05/14/2021 PRTD 102660 AUDUBON SOCIETY OF NEW YORK STATE 10984-2021 04/13/2021 20211405 500.00 CHECK 459119 TOTAL: 500.00 459120 05/14/2021 PRTD 101718 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 03010522 04/14/2021 20211405 28.19 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 380049747 04/14/2021 20211405 10.17 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 380049772 04/14/2021 20211405 10.42 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 380049573 04/13/2021 20211405 16.56 CHECK 459120 TOTAL: 65.34 459121 05/14/2021 PRTD 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0089045100 04/29/2021 20211405 538.20 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0089066200 04/29/2021 20211405 3,560.30 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0103134900 04/29/2021 20211405 189.16 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0089045400 04/29/2021 20211405 392.65 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0089045600 04/29/2021 20211405 45.55 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0103122200 04/29/2021 20211405 200.21 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0089065300 04/29/2021 20211405 5,645.65 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0089065100 04/29/2021 20211405 3,958.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0103129600 04/29/2021 20211405 104.78 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0089045700 04/29/2021 20211405 265.10 CHECK 459121 TOTAL: 14,899.60 459122 05/14/2021 PRTD 100648 BERTELSON BROTHERS INC WO-1122054-2 04/13/2021 20211405 49.34 CHECK 459122 TOTAL: 49.34 459123 05/14/2021 PRTD 128914 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 31066 04/17/2021 20211405 48.94 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 31081 04/17/2021 20211405 46.66 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 31083 04/17/2021 20211405 48.94 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 4 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET BJKK DEVELOPMENT 31084 04/17/2021 20211405 54.00 CHECK 459123 TOTAL: 198.54 459124 05/14/2021 PRTD 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 12451 04/29/2021 20211405 759.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 12450 04/29/2021 20211405 298.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 12449 04/29/2021 20211405 298.00 CHECK 459124 TOTAL: 1,355.00 459125 05/14/2021 PRTD 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84024018 04/14/2021 20211405 1,312.09 CHECK 459125 TOTAL: 1,312.09 459126 05/14/2021 PRTD 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 177137 04/27/2021 20211405 403.00 BOURGET IMPORTS 177135 04/27/2021 20211405 1,413.00 BOURGET IMPORTS 177136 04/27/2021 20211405 423.00 CHECK 459126 TOTAL: 2,239.00 459127 05/14/2021 PRTD 142566 BRASS FOUNDRY BREWING CO E-6372 04/28/2021 20211405 128.00 CHECK 459127 TOTAL: 128.00 459128 05/14/2021 PRTD 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION B248467 04/16/2021 20211405 7,396.50 CHECK 459128 TOTAL: 7,396.50 459129 05/14/2021 PRTD 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339270284 04/28/2021 20211405 3,262.80 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339270314 04/28/2021 20211405 1,145.25 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339270312 04/28/2021 20211405 1,271.75 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339270309 04/28/2021 20211405 91.16 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339270310 04/28/2021 20211405 849.30 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339270311 04/28/2021 20211405 2,555.88 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339270313 04/28/2021 20211405 405.75 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 5 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339270307 04/28/2021 20211405 1,043.90 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339270301 04/28/2021 20211405 178.95 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339270308 04/28/2021 20211405 1,977.84 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339270305 04/28/2021 20211405 191.45 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339270304 04/28/2021 20211405 2,653.61 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339270306 04/28/2021 20211405 264.41 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339270303 04/28/2021 20211405 279.29 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 339270302 04/28/2021 20211405 3,374.69 CHECK 459129 TOTAL: 19,546.03 459130 05/14/2021 PRTD 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 339249111 04/27/2021 20211405 50.00 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 339249098 04/27/2021 20211405 4,906.75 CHECK 459130 TOTAL: 4,956.75 459131 05/14/2021 PRTD 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 339249110 04/27/2021 20211405 3,115.60 CHECK 459131 TOTAL: 3,115.60 459132 05/14/2021 PRTD 137991 BRUSKE ENTERPRISES INC 79451 04/14/2021 20211405 163.01 CHECK 459132 TOTAL: 163.01 459133 05/14/2021 PRTD 140503 COUNTY OF DAKOTA 9409 04/20/2021 20211405 692.13 COUNTY OF DAKOTA 9412 04/20/2021 20211405 108.36 CHECK 459133 TOTAL: 800.49 459134 05/14/2021 PRTD 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 932837440 03/25/2021 20211405 397.80 CALLAWAY GOLF 933021735 04/15/2021 20211405 158.42 CALLAWAY GOLF 933035337 04/19/2021 20211405 158.42 CALLAWAY GOLF 933029579 04/16/2021 20211405 153.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 6 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 459134 TOTAL: 867.64 459135 05/14/2021 PRTD 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2537719 04/23/2021 20211405 117.00 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2537847 04/23/2021 20211405 1,639.70 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2537848 04/23/2021 20211405 58.50 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2537835 04/23/2021 20211405 2,179.30 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2537836 04/23/2021 20211405 192.73 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2540222 04/27/2021 20211405 6,906.30 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2540223 04/27/2021 20211405 71.98 CHECK 459135 TOTAL: 11,165.51 459136 05/14/2021 PRTD 103300 CENTER FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT 18701 04/14/2021 20211405 950.00 CHECK 459136 TOTAL: 950.00 459137 05/14/2021 PRTD 135835 CENTURYLINK-ACCESS BILL 5142xlp683-2021067 03/08/2021 20211405 1,242.00 CENTURYLINK-ACCESS BILL 5142xlp683-2021098 04/08/2021 20211405 1,242.00 CHECK 459137 TOTAL: 2,484.00 459138 05/14/2021 PRTD 130618 CHANHASSEN AUTO CENTERS LLC 21676 04/13/2021 20211405 3,287.28 CHECK 459138 TOTAL: 3,287.28 459139 05/14/2021 PRTD 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 4081722328 04/16/2021 20211405 63.28 CINTAS CORPORATION 4081722260 04/16/2021 20211405 57.68 CINTAS CORPORATION 4081827032 04/19/2021 20211405 39.01 CINTAS CORPORATION 4081826790 04/19/2021 20211405 9.86 CINTAS CORPORATION 4081827023 04/19/2021 20211405 30.25 CINTAS CORPORATION 4081826546 04/19/2021 20211405 25.20 CINTAS CORPORATION 4081826480 04/19/2021 20211405 37.20 CINTAS CORPORATION 4081826495 04/19/2021 20211405 51.69 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 7 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CINTAS CORPORATION 4081826897 04/19/2021 20211405 36.88 CINTAS CORPORATION 4081826912 04/19/2021 20211405 28.62 CHECK 459139 TOTAL: 379.67 459140 05/14/2021 PRTD 124749 CITY OF EAGAN 10203 04/17/2021 20211405 1,042.47 CHECK 459140 TOTAL: 1,042.47 459141 05/14/2021 PRTD 103216 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS 431-0005.300-4/21 04/06/2021 20211405 11,215.17 CHECK 459141 TOTAL: 11,215.17 459142 05/14/2021 PRTD 146213 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 8714 04/19/2021 20211405 1,748.79 CHECK 459142 TOTAL: 1,748.79 459143 05/14/2021 PRTD 126726 COBRA PUMA GOLF DC158983 04/15/2021 20211405 -45.17 COBRA PUMA GOLF G2472780 04/20/2021 20211405 841.52 CHECK 459143 TOTAL: 796.35 459144 05/14/2021 PRTD 120433 COMCAST HOLDINGS CORPORATION 0177449-4/21 04/25/2021 20211405 145.90 CHECK 459144 TOTAL: 145.90 459145 05/14/2021 PRTD 120433 COMCAST HOLDINGS CORPORATION 0740105-4/21 04/18/2021 20211405 98.02 CHECK 459145 TOTAL: 98.02 459146 05/14/2021 PRTD 120433 COMCAST HOLDINGS CORPORATION 0373022-4/21 04/17/2021 20211405 67.58 CHECK 459146 TOTAL: 67.58 459147 05/14/2021 PRTD 100699 CULLIGAN SOFTWATER SERVICE COMPAN 114X79520504 03/31/2021 20211405 19.10 CULLIGAN SOFTWATER SERVICE COMPAN 114-10014090-3/0421 04/30/2021 20211405 481.37 CHECK 459147 TOTAL: 500.47 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 8 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 459148 05/14/2021 PRTD 141837 DAIOHS USA INC INV546040 04/14/2021 20211405 254.95 DAIOHS USA INC 546047 04/15/2021 20211405 619.95 CHECK 459148 TOTAL: 874.90 459149 05/14/2021 PRTD 100130 DAKOTA COUNTY 9813 05/01/2021 20211405 444.01 CHECK 459149 TOTAL: 444.01 459150 05/14/2021 PRTD 100130 DAKOTA COUNTY 8790 04/20/2021 20211405 1,143.33 CHECK 459150 TOTAL: 1,143.33 459151 05/14/2021 PRTD 104020 DALCO ENTERPRISES INC 3768154 04/15/2021 20211405 423.01 DALCO ENTERPRISES INC 3768586 04/16/2021 20211405 225.46 DALCO ENTERPRISES INC 3769198 04/19/2021 20211405 435.98 CHECK 459151 TOTAL: 1,084.45 459152 05/14/2021 PRTD 124125 DAPHNE'S HEADCOVERS 0302332-IN 04/01/2021 20211405 278.71 CHECK 459152 TOTAL: 278.71 459153 05/14/2021 PRTD 118190 DAVIS EQUIPMENT CORPORATION EI13656 04/13/2021 20211405 183.30 CHECK 459153 TOTAL: 183.30 459154 05/14/2021 PRTD 102195 DAY INVESTMENTS LLC P38673447 04/13/2021 20211405 192.95 DAY INVESTMENTS LLC P38708705 04/14/2021 20211405 139.80 CHECK 459154 TOTAL: 332.75 459155 05/14/2021 PRTD 102195 DAY INVESTMENTS LLC P38733667 04/15/2021 20211405 163.90 DAY INVESTMENTS LLC P38673563 04/13/2021 20211405 86.85 CHECK 459155 TOTAL: 250.75 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 9 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 459156 05/14/2021 PRTD 100718 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 19771/1 04/15/2021 20211405 17.07 CHECK 459156 TOTAL: 17.07 459157 05/14/2021 PRTD 121103 DIRECTV GROUP INC 016523692X210413 04/13/2021 20211405 105.23 CHECK 459157 TOTAL: 105.23 459158 05/14/2021 PRTD 145811 EASTLAKE CRAFT BREWERY LLC 1282 04/28/2021 20211405 60.00 CHECK 459158 TOTAL: 60.00 459159 05/14/2021 PRTD 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 830153 04/15/2021 20211405 142.80 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 830152 04/15/2021 20211405 101.15 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 830151 04/15/2021 20211405 113.05 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 830150 04/15/2021 20211405 89.25 CHECK 459159 TOTAL: 446.25 459160 05/14/2021 PRTD 100049 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES 86122 02/09/2021 20211405 573.75 CHECK 459160 TOTAL: 573.75 459161 05/14/2021 PRTD 160062 ELM CREEK BREWING COMPANY E-1041 04/29/2021 20211405 208.00 CHECK 459161 TOTAL: 208.00 459162 05/14/2021 PRTD 100146 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-413499 04/13/2021 20211405 89.23 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-6868089 04/14/2021 20211405 9.05 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-6872442 04/16/2021 20211405 319.80 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-414025 04/19/2021 20211405 104.77 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-6872574 04/16/2021 20211405 199.80 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-414104 04/19/2021 20211405 149.50 CHECK 459162 TOTAL: 872.15 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 10 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 459163 05/14/2021 PRTD 147181 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-3282 04/28/2021 20211405 180.00 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-3283 04/28/2021 20211405 180.00 CHECK 459163 TOTAL: 360.00 459164 05/14/2021 PRTD 103600 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0471027 04/13/2021 20211405 679.50 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0469581-2 04/14/2021 20211405 169.29 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0471029 04/13/2021 20211405 4,731.72 CHECK 459164 TOTAL: 5,580.51 459165 05/14/2021 PRTD 160061 FILTER BREWING COMPANY LLC 1397 04/15/2021 20211405 195.00 FILTER BREWING COMPANY LLC 1398 04/15/2021 20211405 130.00 FILTER BREWING COMPANY LLC 1399 04/19/2021 20211405 130.00 CHECK 459165 TOTAL: 455.00 459166 05/14/2021 PRTD 140809 FLAGSHIP RECREATION F8714 02/10/2021 20211405 1,910.00 FLAGSHIP RECREATION F8717 02/16/2021 20211405 1,910.00 FLAGSHIP RECREATION F8744 03/30/2021 20211405 1,980.00 FLAGSHIP RECREATION F8742 03/26/2021 20211405 4,273.00 CHECK 459166 TOTAL: 10,073.00 459167 05/14/2021 PRTD 102727 FORCE AMERICA DISTRIBUTING LLC 001-1532292 04/13/2021 20211405 670.00 CHECK 459167 TOTAL: 670.00 459168 05/14/2021 PRTD 122414 FORKLIFTS OF MINNESOTA INC 01P8392360 04/19/2021 20211405 89.42 CHECK 459168 TOTAL: 89.42 459169 05/14/2021 PRTD 104716 GALE-TEC ENGINEERING INC 3067 05/06/2021 20211405 90.00 CHECK 459169 TOTAL: 90.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 11 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 459170 05/14/2021 PRTD 102456 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1335705 04/13/2021 20211405 62.92 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1336090 04/14/2021 20211405 6,687.80 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1337659 04/15/2021 20211405 8.04 CHECK 459170 TOTAL: 6,758.76 459171 05/14/2021 PRTD 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION INC W12681 04/15/2021 20211405 711.00 CHECK 459171 TOTAL: 711.00 459172 05/14/2021 PRTD 102613 MURPHY AUTOMOTIVE, INC. 180448 04/14/2021 20211405 114.95 CHECK 459172 TOTAL: 114.95 459173 05/14/2021 PRTD 144412 WINEBOW MN00093533 04/27/2021 20211405 243.50 WINEBOW MN00093534 04/27/2021 20211405 114.25 WINEBOW MN00093569 04/27/2021 20211405 1,879.98 WINEBOW MN00093568 04/27/2021 20211405 309.00 CHECK 459173 TOTAL: 2,546.73 459174 05/14/2021 PRTD 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 9320997378 04/14/2021 20211405 1.11 CHECK 459174 TOTAL: 1.11 459175 05/14/2021 PRTD 139810 GTRE COMMERCIAL 7813 02/15/2021 20211405 2,000.00 CHECK 459175 TOTAL: 2,000.00 459176 05/14/2021 PRTD 151092 HARDLINE EQUIPMENT LLC 42202609 04/15/2021 20211405 170.30 CHECK 459176 TOTAL: 170.30 459177 05/14/2021 PRTD 115599 HENNEPIN COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 9462 04/23/2021 20211405 200.00 CHECK 459177 TOTAL: 200.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 12 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 459178 05/14/2021 PRTD 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC 405228 04/27/2021 20211405 1,993.50 HOHENSTEINS INC 405217 04/27/2021 20211405 100.80 HOHENSTEINS INC 405214 04/27/2021 20211405 1,003.50 HOHENSTEINS INC 405213 04/27/2021 20211405 50.40 HOHENSTEINS INC 405234 04/28/2021 20211405 1,761.30 CHECK 459178 TOTAL: 4,909.50 459179 05/14/2021 PRTD 100417 HORIZON CHEMICAL CO 210416056-ER 04/19/2021 20211405 379.77 CHECK 459179 TOTAL: 379.77 459180 05/14/2021 PRTD 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 99968 04/28/2021 20211405 1,853.00 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 99967 04/27/2021 20211405 591.30 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 99969 04/28/2021 20211405 1,587.50 CHECK 459180 TOTAL: 4,031.80 459181 05/14/2021 PRTD 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORPORATION INV250393 04/13/2021 20211405 656.46 CHECK 459181 TOTAL: 656.46 459182 05/14/2021 PRTD 122079 EDINA COMMUNITY EDUCATION SERVICE 2021-1081 04/13/2021 20211405 635.00 CHECK 459182 TOTAL: 635.00 459183 05/14/2021 PRTD 150898 INVICTUS BREWING INC 2841 04/29/2021 20211405 171.00 INVICTUS BREWING INC 2840 04/27/2021 20211405 163.00 CHECK 459183 TOTAL: 334.00 459184 05/14/2021 PRTD 116776 JASPERSEN ENTERPRISES INC 86088 04/14/2021 20211405 140.00 CHECK 459184 TOTAL: 140.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 13 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 459185 05/14/2021 PRTD 100828 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC IT-4/21 04/15/2021 20211405 11.50 CHECK 459185 TOTAL: 11.50 459186 05/14/2021 PRTD 100741 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3179282 04/28/2021 20211405 440.38 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3179283 04/28/2021 20211405 2,694.90 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3179284 04/28/2021 20211405 5,095.93 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3179285 04/28/2021 20211405 3,340.40 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3179281 04/28/2021 20211405 445.00 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3179280 04/28/2021 20211405 83.10 CHECK 459186 TOTAL: 12,099.71 459187 05/14/2021 PRTD 160089 DEERE & COMPANY 117082150 04/06/2021 20211405 6,234.89 CHECK 459187 TOTAL: 6,234.89 459188 05/14/2021 PRTD 100835 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3470990 04/29/2021 20211405 515.50 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3470991 04/29/2021 20211405 2,610.70 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 306203 04/23/2021 20211405 -80.00 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3470993 04/29/2021 20211405 191.20 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3470992 04/29/2021 20211405 3,099.75 CHECK 459188 TOTAL: 6,337.15 459189 05/14/2021 PRTD 100835 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6193859 04/23/2021 20211405 70.50 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6193858 04/23/2021 20211405 82.38 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6193857 04/23/2021 20211405 146.38 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6194046 04/23/2021 20211405 88.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6196751 04/29/2021 20211405 2,504.01 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6196754 04/29/2021 20211405 2,133.96 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6196753 04/29/2021 20211405 193.57 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 14 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6196749 04/29/2021 20211405 1,258.09 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6196748 04/29/2021 20211405 45.19 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6196747 04/29/2021 20211405 2,411.87 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6196746 04/29/2021 20211405 1,825.72 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6196757 04/29/2021 20211405 1,643.08 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6196760 04/29/2021 20211405 1,601.88 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6196759 04/29/2021 20211405 169.88 CHECK 459189 TOTAL: 14,174.51 459190 05/14/2021 PRTD 100835 WINE MERCHANTS 7327598 04/29/2021 20211405 1,767.47 WINE MERCHANTS 7327597 04/29/2021 20211405 4,583.73 WINE MERCHANTS 7327596 04/29/2021 20211405 1,306.71 WINE MERCHANTS 7327595 04/29/2021 20211405 48.38 WINE MERCHANTS 7327592 04/29/2021 20211405 2,585.95 WINE MERCHANTS 7327591 04/29/2021 20211405 2,068.76 WINE MERCHANTS 7327594 04/29/2021 20211405 3,161.86 WINE MERCHANTS 7327590 04/29/2021 20211405 1,306.71 WINE MERCHANTS 7327589 04/29/2021 20211405 1,767.47 WINE MERCHANTS 7327601 04/29/2021 20211405 1,767.47 WINE MERCHANTS 7327600 04/29/2021 20211405 1,023.47 WINE MERCHANTS 7327602 04/29/2021 20211405 856.95 WINE MERCHANTS 7327599 04/29/2021 20211405 24.19 WINE MERCHANTS 7327593 04/29/2021 20211405 3,103.14 CHECK 459190 TOTAL: 25,372.26 459191 05/14/2021 PRTD 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1787191 04/23/2021 20211405 225.36 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1787192 04/23/2021 20211405 42.69 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 15 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 143993 04/26/2021 20211405 -233.28 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1790867 04/29/2021 20211405 1,416.97 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1790866 04/29/2021 20211405 6,115.26 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1790865 04/29/2021 20211405 440.03 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1790864 04/29/2021 20211405 2,542.03 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1790863 04/29/2021 20211405 219.57 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1790862 04/29/2021 20211405 1,845.29 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1790861 04/29/2021 20211405 1,632.95 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1790860 04/29/2021 20211405 650.87 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1790858 04/29/2021 20211405 1,016.23 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1790857 04/29/2021 20211405 2,510.92 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1790856 04/29/2021 20211405 97.19 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1790855 04/29/2021 20211405 146.38 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1790854 04/29/2021 20211405 767.22 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1790853 04/29/2021 20211405 237.88 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1790878 04/29/2021 20211405 365.67 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1790877` 04/29/2021 20211405 2,748.81 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1790876 04/29/2021 20211405 308.74 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1790875 04/29/2021 20211405 367.14 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1790874 04/29/2021 20211405 208.19 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1790873 04/29/2021 20211405 2,181.24 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1790872 04/29/2021 20211405 894.85 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1790859 04/29/2021 20211405 1,837.30 CHECK 459191 TOTAL: 28,585.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 16 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 459192 05/14/2021 PRTD 103409 KELBRO COMPANY 2616846 04/29/2021 20211405 154.28 KELBRO COMPANY 2616911 04/29/2021 20211405 169.56 CHECK 459192 TOTAL: 323.84 459193 05/14/2021 PRTD 144395 KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 160438 04/14/2021 20211405 4,838.00 CHECK 459193 TOTAL: 4,838.00 459194 05/14/2021 PRTD 100944 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 125215 04/28/2021 20211405 1,691.00 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 125221 04/27/2021 20211405 1,114.50 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 125224 04/28/2021 20211405 1,318.75 CHECK 459194 TOTAL: 4,124.25 459195 05/14/2021 PRTD 151024 LA DONA SBC 4683 04/29/2021 20211405 430.00 LA DONA SBC 4682 04/28/2021 20211405 320.00 LA DONA SBC 4684 04/29/2021 20211405 430.00 CHECK 459195 TOTAL: 1,180.00 459196 05/14/2021 PRTD 100849 LAKELAND ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT CO 12345226-01 04/14/2021 20211405 379.96 CHECK 459196 TOTAL: 379.96 459197 05/14/2021 PRTD 151166 LAMIS, JAMES 9046 04/24/2021 20211405 3,000.00 CHECK 459197 TOTAL: 3,000.00 459198 05/14/2021 PRTD 101220 LANO EQUIPMENT INC 01-826312 04/23/2021 22100017 20211405 23,350.00 CHECK 459198 TOTAL: 23,350.00 459199 05/14/2021 PRTD 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9308370635 04/13/2021 20211405 56.04 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9308384064 04/18/2021 20211405 1,342.42 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9308386120 04/19/2021 20211405 148.64 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 17 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 459199 TOTAL: 1,547.10 459200 05/14/2021 PRTD 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 340480 04/08/2021 20211405 1,840.00 CHECK 459200 TOTAL: 1,840.00 459201 05/14/2021 PRTD 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 9928 04/19/2021 20211405 21,034.61 CHECK 459201 TOTAL: 21,034.61 459202 05/14/2021 PRTD 117026 LIFE-ASSIST INC 1092070 04/14/2021 20211405 67.00 LIFE-ASSIST INC 1091933 04/14/2021 20211405 84.06 CHECK 459202 TOTAL: 151.06 459203 05/14/2021 PRTD 146427 LUCID BREWING LLC 10365 04/28/2021 20211405 192.00 LUCID BREWING LLC 10357 04/29/2021 20211405 146.00 CHECK 459203 TOTAL: 338.00 459204 05/14/2021 PRTD 141916 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 36714 04/28/2021 20211405 110.70 CHECK 459204 TOTAL: 110.70 459205 05/14/2021 PRTD 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 22315342 04/16/2021 20211405 12,433.35 CHECK 459205 TOTAL: 12,433.35 459206 05/14/2021 PRTD 122554 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC 0023400024 04/14/2021 20211405 553.36 CHECK 459206 TOTAL: 553.36 459207 05/14/2021 PRTD 141215 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV574693 04/27/2021 20211405 133.50 CHECK 459207 TOTAL: 133.50 459208 05/14/2021 PRTD 130477 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 578172 04/28/2021 20211405 84.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 578171 04/28/2021 20211405 496.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 578180 04/28/2021 20211405 126.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 18 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 578179 04/28/2021 20211405 941.00 CHECK 459208 TOTAL: 1,647.00 459209 05/14/2021 PRTD 101483 MENARDS INC 37402 04/13/2021 20211405 479.93 MENARDS INC 37479 04/14/2021 20211405 11.96 MENARDS INC 37546 04/15/2021 20211405 1,015.60 MENARDS INC 37563 04/15/2021 20211405 236.47 MENARDS INC 37601 04/16/2021 20211405 32.94 MENARDS INC 37580 04/16/2021 20211405 1,294.38 MENARDS INC 37471 04/14/2021 20211405 68.98 MENARDS INC 37732 04/19/2021 20211405 51.96 MENARDS INC 37419 04/13/2021 20211405 50.96 MENARDS INC 37425 04/13/2021 20211405 12.99 MENARDS INC 36615 03/31/2021 20211405 88.41 MENARDS INC 35489 03/11/2021 20211405 16.98 CHECK 459209 TOTAL: 3,361.56 459210 05/14/2021 PRTD 115377 METRO FURNITURE SOLUTIONS BY HENR 709731 02/14/2021 20211405 1,442.88 CHECK 459210 TOTAL: 1,442.88 459211 05/14/2021 PRTD 130020 METROPOLITAN CONSORTIUM OF COMMUN 10355 02/06/2021 20211405 6,250.00 CHECK 459211 TOTAL: 6,250.00 459212 05/14/2021 PRTD 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD LLC 523513 04/16/2021 20211405 106.15 CHECK 459212 TOTAL: 106.15 459213 05/14/2021 PRTD 145395 MILK AND HONEY LLC 8396 04/27/2021 20211405 198.00 MILK AND HONEY LLC 8436 04/29/2021 20211405 198.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 19 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 459213 TOTAL: 396.00 459214 05/14/2021 PRTD 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 20172334 12/31/2020 20211405 -10.46 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 00076126 04/30/2021 20211405 71.08 CHECK 459214 TOTAL: 60.62 459215 05/14/2021 PRTD 127062 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENANCE IN 180178556 04/18/2021 20211405 5.00 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENANCE IN 180178558 04/18/2021 20211405 15.00 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENANCE IN 180178557 04/18/2021 20211405 21.51 CHECK 459215 TOTAL: 41.51 459216 05/14/2021 PRTD 102222 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT P00012850 01/29/2021 20211405 123.68 CHECK 459216 TOTAL: 123.68 459217 05/14/2021 PRTD 100781 MJ DONOVAN ENTERPRISES INC 138533 04/13/2021 20211405 200.00 CHECK 459217 TOTAL: 200.00 459218 05/14/2021 PRTD 103944 MOBILE HEALTH SERVICES LLC 39201 04/14/2021 20211405 180.00 CHECK 459218 TOTAL: 180.00 459219 05/14/2021 PRTD 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC E-21293 04/27/2021 20211405 238.50 MODIST BREWING LLC E-21292 04/27/2021 20211405 112.50 CHECK 459219 TOTAL: 351.00 459220 05/14/2021 PRTD 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1295709-01 04/13/2021 20211405 94.60 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1293530-00 04/15/2021 20211405 251.90 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1296809-00 04/19/2021 20211405 66.18 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1295533-01 04/19/2021 20211405 110.36 CHECK 459220 TOTAL: 523.04 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 20 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 459221 05/14/2021 PRTD 134024 NAGELL APPRAISAL INCORPORATED 29128 04/19/2021 20211405 4,000.00 CHECK 459221 TOTAL: 4,000.00 459222 05/14/2021 PRTD 135914 NARTEC INC 15888 04/19/2021 20211405 362.52 CHECK 459222 TOTAL: 362.52 459223 05/14/2021 PRTD 103665 NATIONAL ACADEMIES OF EMERGENCY D SIN279686 04/16/2021 20211405 55.00 CHECK 459223 TOTAL: 55.00 459224 05/14/2021 PRTD 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 173026 04/28/2021 20211405 438.00 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 173025 04/28/2021 20211405 1,056.00 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 173027 04/28/2021 20211405 1,314.00 CHECK 459224 TOTAL: 2,808.00 459225 05/14/2021 PRTD 100936 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC 669001 04/14/2021 20211405 451.97 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC 669038 04/15/2021 20211405 22.40 CHECK 459225 TOTAL: 474.37 459226 05/14/2021 PRTD 141965 OMNI BREWING COMPANY LLC E-9657 04/28/2021 20211405 207.00 OMNI BREWING COMPANY LLC E-9654 04/28/2021 20211405 218.00 OMNI BREWING COMPANY LLC E-9658 04/28/2021 20211405 726.00 CHECK 459226 TOTAL: 1,151.00 459227 05/14/2021 PRTD 999994 NANCY TARBOX 9710 04/29/2021 20211405 32.26 CHECK 459227 TOTAL: 32.26 459228 05/14/2021 PRTD 999994 CARL WICKLUND 9729 04/29/2020 20211405 132.78 CHECK 459228 TOTAL: 132.78 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 21 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 459229 05/14/2021 PRTD 999994 LINDSEY SEXTON 9736 04/29/2020 20211405 54.00 CHECK 459229 TOTAL: 54.00 459230 05/14/2021 PRTD 999994 NANCY WASSERMAN 9734 04/29/2020 20211405 134.41 CHECK 459230 TOTAL: 134.41 459231 05/14/2021 PRTD 999994 RAY ENGH 9735 04/29/2020 20211405 132.78 CHECK 459231 TOTAL: 132.78 459232 05/14/2021 PRTD 999996 KATHY REILLY 8334 04/14/2021 20211405 210.00 CHECK 459232 TOTAL: 210.00 459233 05/14/2021 PRTD 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 67716651 04/27/2021 20211405 300.50 CHECK 459233 TOTAL: 300.50 459234 05/14/2021 PRTD 149249 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-99687 04/29/2021 20211405 562.00 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-99689 04/29/2021 20211405 476.50 CHECK 459234 TOTAL: 1,038.50 459235 05/14/2021 PRTD 146765 PILLSBURY UNITED COMMUNITIES 091015 04/14/2021 20211405 1,517.14 CHECK 459235 TOTAL: 1,517.14 459236 05/14/2021 PRTD 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC 363801 04/15/2021 20211405 2,223.86 CHECK 459236 TOTAL: 2,223.86 459237 05/14/2021 PRTD 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 7022971 04/15/2021 20211405 62.40 CHECK 459237 TOTAL: 62.40 459238 05/14/2021 PRTD 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 210524362 04/19/2021 20211405 2,309.00 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 210524492 04/19/2021 20211405 756.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 22 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 210524185 04/19/2021 20211405 1,074.57 CHECK 459238 TOTAL: 4,139.57 459239 05/14/2021 PRTD 131064 PRECISION PRINTING INC 6032 04/13/2021 20211405 937.00 CHECK 459239 TOTAL: 937.00 459240 05/14/2021 PRTD 143618 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-21987 04/28/2021 20211405 345.00 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-21984 04/28/2021 20211405 256.00 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-22000 04/28/2021 20211405 318.00 CHECK 459240 TOTAL: 919.00 459241 05/14/2021 PRTD 100972 R & R SPECIALTIES INC 0072732-IN 04/15/2021 20211405 13,332.82 CHECK 459241 TOTAL: 13,332.82 459242 05/14/2021 PRTD 133091 RANGE SERVANT AMERICA INC 106149 04/19/2021 20211405 1,148.68 CHECK 459242 TOTAL: 1,148.68 459243 05/14/2021 PRTD 101698 RECREONICS 853913 04/13/2021 20211405 537.11 CHECK 459243 TOTAL: 537.11 459244 05/14/2021 PRTD 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 82049 04/29/2020 20211405 456.00 CHECK 459244 TOTAL: 456.00 459245 05/14/2021 PRTD 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 1928515434 04/13/2021 20211405 49.44 CHECK 459245 TOTAL: 49.44 459246 05/14/2021 PRTD 124119 RJM DISTRIBUTING INC IND023176 04/28/2021 20211405 129.90 CHECK 459246 TOTAL: 129.90 459247 05/14/2021 PRTD 101659 ORKIN 209739471 04/13/2021 20211405 63.00 ORKIN 209739531 04/19/2021 20211405 30.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 23 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 459247 TOTAL: 93.00 459248 05/14/2021 PRTD 160058 ROOM & BOARD, INC. 4028898 05/03/2021 20211405 6,592.31 ROOM & BOARD, INC. 4027895 05/04/2021 20211405 8,184.66 ROOM & BOARD, INC. 4028947 05/04/2021 20211405 4,086.23 ROOM & BOARD, INC. 4028951 05/04/2021 20211405 1,767.69 ROOM & BOARD, INC. 4027492 05/04/2021 20211405 6,108.44 CHECK 459248 TOTAL: 26,739.33 459249 05/14/2021 PRTD 132210 RUSCIANO GROUP 66393 04/14/2021 20211405 755.00 RUSCIANO GROUP 66408 04/16/2021 20211405 755.00 CHECK 459249 TOTAL: 1,510.00 459250 05/14/2021 PRTD 134173 SAFE-FAST INC INV244485 04/13/2021 20211405 447.15 SAFE-FAST INC INV244632 04/19/2021 20211405 465.00 SAFE-FAST INC INV244633 04/19/2021 20211405 214.80 CHECK 459250 TOTAL: 1,126.95 459251 05/14/2021 PRTD 144553 SALTCO LLC 61051 04/15/2021 20211405 70.00 CHECK 459251 TOTAL: 70.00 459252 05/14/2021 PRTD 160055 SANDSTROM LAND MANAGEMENT 041821 04/18/2021 20211405 2,522.50 CHECK 459252 TOTAL: 2,522.50 459253 05/14/2021 PRTD 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC 152168 04/15/2021 20211405 3,530.89 CHECK 459253 TOTAL: 3,530.89 459254 05/14/2021 PRTD 100995 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 403207 04/13/2021 20211405 8,674.58 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 403103 04/13/2021 20211405 2,815.10 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 24 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 403102 04/13/2021 20211405 913.06 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 403355 04/14/2021 20211405 995.56 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 403683 04/15/2021 20211405 254.93 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 403684 04/15/2021 20211405 1,300.00 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 403491 04/14/2021 20211405 2,670.61 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 404511 05/07/2021 20211405 1,499.91 CHECK 459254 TOTAL: 19,123.75 459255 05/14/2021 PRTD 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL ARV/47750149 04/16/2021 20211405 307.61 CHECK 459255 TOTAL: 307.61 459256 05/14/2021 PRTD 104672 SPRINT SPECTRUM LP 873184124-221 04/18/2021 20211405 135.36 CHECK 459256 TOTAL: 135.36 459257 05/14/2021 PRTD 101004 SPS COMPANIES INC S4453692.001 04/13/2021 20211405 51.20 CHECK 459257 TOTAL: 51.20 459258 05/14/2021 PRTD 102251 ST ANDREWS PRODUCTS CO 1020 04/18/2021 20211405 1,941.16 CHECK 459258 TOTAL: 1,941.16 459259 05/14/2021 PRTD 146960 STACKED DECK BREWING 002449 04/28/2021 20211405 225.00 CHECK 459259 TOTAL: 225.00 459260 05/14/2021 PRTD 145599 SSI MN TRANCHE 1 LLC 13502 04/20/2021 20211405 38,551.49 SSI MN TRANCHE 1 LLC 13503 04/19/2021 20211405 8,697.62 CHECK 459260 TOTAL: 47,249.11 459261 05/14/2021 PRTD 129360 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY SOLUT 6000765874 01/24/2021 20211405 303.96 CHECK 459261 TOTAL: 303.96 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 25 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 459262 05/14/2021 PRTD 101349 STATE OF MINNESOTA 10310 05/07/2021 20211405 2,250.00 CHECK 459262 TOTAL: 2,250.00 459263 05/14/2021 PRTD 143698 STORM COMBATIVES TRAINING AND CON 1157 05/06/2021 20211405 799.00 CHECK 459263 TOTAL: 799.00 459264 05/14/2021 PRTD 101015 STREICHERS INC I1495266 04/06/2021 20211405 314.00 STREICHERS INC I1497085 04/15/2021 20211405 132.00 STREICHERS INC I1497295 04/15/2021 20211405 199.89 CHECK 459264 TOTAL: 645.89 459265 05/14/2021 PRTD 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 138739 04/19/2021 20211405 74.67 CHECK 459265 TOTAL: 74.67 459266 05/14/2021 PRTD 160081 GREAT CIRCLE VENTURES HOLDINGS, L 1025226 04/17/2021 20211405 89.00 CHECK 459266 TOTAL: 89.00 459267 05/14/2021 PRTD 122794 TENNANT SALES AND SERVICE COMPANY 917809002 04/15/2021 20211405 222.23 TENNANT SALES AND SERVICE COMPANY 917812282 04/15/2021 20211405 91.94 TENNANT SALES AND SERVICE COMPANY 917803552 04/13/2021 20211405 772.03 TENNANT SALES AND SERVICE COMPANY 917824701 04/22/2021 20211405 -222.23 CHECK 459267 TOTAL: 863.97 459268 05/14/2021 PRTD 160085 TEREX USA, LLC 7113859 04/19/2021 20211405 5,596.62 CHECK 459268 TOTAL: 5,596.62 459269 05/14/2021 PRTD 134784 THE IDEA CREEK 150 04/17/2021 20211405 945.00 CHECK 459269 TOTAL: 945.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 26 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 459270 05/14/2021 PRTD 143144 TI-ZACK CONCRETE INC ENG 20-11 FINAL 04/14/2021 20211405 13,141.56 CHECK 459270 TOTAL: 13,141.56 459271 05/14/2021 PRTD 104347 TIERNEY BROTHERS INC 841993 04/14/2021 20211405 404.25 CHECK 459271 TOTAL: 404.25 459272 05/14/2021 PRTD 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL IN #M26368 04/14/2021 20211405 223.00 CHECK 459272 TOTAL: 223.00 459273 05/14/2021 PRTD 134673 TOTAL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INC S1084 04/16/2021 20211405 3,578.95 CHECK 459273 TOTAL: 3,578.95 459274 05/14/2021 PRTD 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE COMPANY INC PSI2037856 04/15/2021 20211405 115.00 CHECK 459274 TOTAL: 115.00 459275 05/14/2021 PRTD 146436 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC 045-336867 04/16/2021 20211405 1,400.00 CHECK 459275 TOTAL: 1,400.00 459276 05/14/2021 PRTD 130874 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA) IN 192208620-002 04/15/2021 20211405 4,500.00 CHECK 459276 TOTAL: 4,500.00 459277 05/14/2021 PRTD 140009 US KIDS GOLF LLC IN2007361 04/15/2021 20211405 305.35 CHECK 459277 TOTAL: 305.35 459278 05/14/2021 PRTD 144033 USS MINNESOTA ONE MT LLC 13501 04/19/2021 20211405 5,683.12 CHECK 459278 TOTAL: 5,683.12 459279 05/14/2021 PRTD 144209 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 2515 04/29/2021 20211405 180.00 CHECK 459279 TOTAL: 180.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 27 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 459280 05/14/2021 PRTD 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S004602795.001 04/14/2021 20211405 282.91 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S004529577.002 04/16/2021 20211405 -122.08 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S004588732.002 04/19/2021 20211405 2,762.70 CHECK 459280 TOTAL: 2,923.53 459281 05/14/2021 PRTD 119454 VINOCOPIA INC 0278083-IN 04/29/2021 20211405 222.25 VINOCOPIA INC 0278084-IN 04/29/2021 20211405 222.25 VINOCOPIA INC 0278085-IN 04/29/2021 20211405 169.00 VINOCOPIA INC 0278087-IN 04/29/2021 20211405 304.67 VINOCOPIA INC 0278086-IN 04/29/2021 20211405 150.00 CHECK 459281 TOTAL: 1,068.17 459282 05/14/2021 PRTD 143468 VONDENKAMP, MARK 000652 04/27/2021 20211405 243.00 VONDENKAMP, MARK 000653 04/27/2021 20211405 414.00 VONDENKAMP, MARK 000654 04/27/2021 20211405 330.00 CHECK 459282 TOTAL: 987.00 459283 05/14/2021 PRTD 140285 WALSER BLOOMINGTON TOYOTA 432802 04/16/2021 20211405 205.01 CHECK 459283 TOTAL: 205.01 459284 05/14/2021 PRTD 120784 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 15923 02/11/2021 20211405 981.51 CHECK 459284 TOTAL: 981.51 459285 05/14/2021 PRTD 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 8480128-2282-3 04/16/2021 20211405 145.43 CHECK 459285 TOTAL: 145.43 459286 05/14/2021 PRTD 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICES INC 11287 04/13/2021 20211405 310.30 CHECK 459286 TOTAL: 310.30 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 28 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 459287 05/14/2021 PRTD 160092 WIESER CONCRETE PRODUCTS INC INV00000156229 01/06/2021 20211405 40,106.00 CHECK 459287 TOTAL: 40,106.00 459288 05/14/2021 PRTD 101033 WINE COMPANY 170525 04/28/2021 20211405 1,457.20 WINE COMPANY 170539 04/28/2021 20211405 1,438.85 WINE COMPANY 170528 04/28/2021 20211405 2,456.05 WINE COMPANY 170537 04/28/2021 20211405 1,762.15 CHECK 459288 TOTAL: 7,114.25 459289 05/14/2021 PRTD 142162 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 2699 04/23/2021 20211405 295.80 CHECK 459289 TOTAL: 295.80 459290 05/14/2021 PRTD 127774 WORLDWIDE CELLARS INC R21-51439 04/27/2021 20211405 112.00 WORLDWIDE CELLARS INC R21-51435 04/27/2021 20211405 295.00 CHECK 459290 TOTAL: 407.00 459291 05/14/2021 PRTD 103410 WW GOETSCH ASSOCIATES INC 106009 04/13/2021 20211405 7,330.00 CHECK 459291 TOTAL: 7,330.00 459292 05/14/2021 PRTD 101103 WW GRAINGER 9867592983 04/13/2021 20211405 513.60 WW GRAINGER 9867592991 04/13/2021 20211405 93.10 WW GRAINGER 9867593015 04/13/2021 20211405 19.35 WW GRAINGER 9867593007 04/13/2021 20211405 93.10 WW GRAINGER 9869540378 04/14/2021 20211405 59.80 WW GRAINGER 9868991945 04/14/2021 20211405 22.61 WW GRAINGER 9870404382 04/15/2021 20211405 40.66 WW GRAINGER 9871193307 04/16/2021 20211405 161.08 WW GRAINGER 9871193299 04/16/2021 20211405 330.88 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 05/13/2021 10:18User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 29 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET WW GRAINGER 9871326337 04/16/2021 20211405 88.00 WW GRAINGER 9873842687 04/19/2021 20211405 79.04 WW GRAINGER 9873540844 04/19/2021 20211405 3.30 CHECK 459292 TOTAL: 1,504.52 459293 05/14/2021 PRTD 160077 YETI HOLDINGS, INC 99364728 04/14/2021 20211405 251.88 CHECK 459293 TOTAL: 251.88 459294 05/14/2021 PRTD 103266 YORKDALE SHOPPES PARTNERS, LLC APRIL 2021 04/16/2021 20211405 2,235.56 CHECK 459294 TOTAL: 2,235.56 459295 05/14/2021 PRTD 136192 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION 3268334 04/14/2021 20211405 91.64 CHECK 459295 TOTAL: 91.64 NUMBER OF CHECKS 190 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** 605,786.22 COUNT AMOUNT TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS 190 605,786.22 *** GRAND TOTAL *** 605,786.22 Date: May 18, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Tracy Petersen, Assistant Director-Recreation & Facilities Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-37: Approving James Metzen Mighty Ducks Grant Program Application Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2021-37 approving support for the James Metzen Mighty Ducks Grant Program application. INTRODUCTION: The State of Minnesota, acting through its agency, the Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission (MASC), is seeking proposals from interested communities to improve ice arenas. Minnesota communities will be eligible to be awarded grants for improving air quality. The Braemar Arena Dehumidification System Replacement P roject, approved by the City Council at the April 20, 2021 regular meeting, qualifies for submittal of a grant application. Staff will return at a future city council meeting for approval should funds be awarded. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-37: Approving James Metzen Mighty Ducks Grant Application Grant Application Resolution No. 2021-37 Support for the James Metzen Mighty Ducks Grant Program Application WHEREAS, the Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission (MASC), via State Bonding funding, provides for general funds to assist political subdivisions of the State of Minnesota for the fulfillment of the purpose and goals of the James Metzen Mighty Ducks Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina desires to complete its project named Braemar Arena Dehumidification System Replacement Project at Braemar Arena located at 7501 Ikola Way, Edina, MN 55439; and WHEREAS, the total cost of completing the project shall be $384,056 and the City of Edina is requesting $25,000 from the James Metzen Mighty Ducks Grant Program and will assume responsibility for a matching contribution of $25,000; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina agrees to own and assume 100 percent operational costs for the facility or equipment, and will operate the facility or equipment for its intended purpose for the functional life of the facility or equipment which is estimated to be 20 years; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina agrees to enter into necessary and required agreements with the MASC for the specific purpose of completing the project; and WHEREAS, a request for reimbursement be made to the MASC for the amount awarded after the completion of the project: and WHEREAS, the Braemar Arena General Manager of the City of Edina is authorized and directed to execute said application and serve as the official liaison with the MASC; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Edina City Council approves the application for the James Metzen Mighty Ducks Grant Program and its commitment to execute the grant agreement if funds are awarded. Dated: May 18, 2021 Attest: ___________________________ _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk of the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of May 18, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting WINTNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of _________________, 20___. _________________ City Clerk May 18, 2021 MASC-Mighty Ducks Grant 1750 105th Avenue NE Blaine, MN 55449 To James Metzen Mighty Ducks Grant Review Team: On behalf of the City of Edina, I am submitting the attached application to the James Metzen Mighty Ducks Grant Program. Thank you in advance for your review of our application. Sincerely, Tracy Petersen Assistant Parks & Recreation Director-Recreation & Facilities tpetersen@EdinaMN.gov 952.826.0431 2020 ROUND TWO JAMES METZEN MIGHTY DUCKS GRANT APPLICATION Type of Application: (check one) [ ] Indirect R-22 Elimination [ ] Direct R-22 Elimination [ x ] Indoor Air Quality Improvement Local Government Unit (LGU) City of Edina, MN LGU Application Contact (Name, Title, Address, Email & Telephone) Tracy Petersen, Assistant Director-Recreation & Facilities 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 tpetersen@EdinaMN.gov 952.826.0431 Project Name and Physical Address Braemar Arena Dehumidification System Replacement 7501 Ikola Way Edina, MN 55439 Primary Contact (Name, Email & Telephone) Chad Eischens, Braemar Arena- General Manager ceischens@EdinaMN.gov 952.833.9502 Minnesota Tax ID Number 8021794 Federal Employee ID Number 41-6005118 Minnesota House of Representatives District Number of Facility 49B Include Project Documentation found at https://www.mnsports.org/mighty-ducks- grant- program/ EXECUTION: IN WITNESS THEREOF, the applicant has caused this application to be executed on the 18 day of May, 2021 By: (Authorized Signer) (Title) Mail three originals of this form to: Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission 1750 105th Avenue NE, Blaine MN 55449-4500 Assistant Director-Recreation & Facilities City of Edina Braemar Arena Dehumidification System Replacement Project Project Information for James Metzen Mighty Ducks Grant Program History or Braemar Arena Originally built in 1965, Braemer Arena was named ESPN’s “Center of the US Hockey Universe” in 2020. The addition of an East Rink was completed in 1987 and the South Rink was added in 1997. The facility is also home to a seasonal outdoor rink added in 2014. Known as a premier facility in the State of MN, Braemar Arena is home to state, national and international hockey and figure skating teams. The Edina Hornets high school teams have won a combined 17 state titles and have an elite locker room facility called the Hornet’s Nest. The Hornet’s Nest also includes a retail store operated by General Sports and a dryland facility operated by Velocity Training Center. The facility is utilized for the following: • Edina Hockey Association which has over 1,200 youth in its program (utilizing the South Rink where the project is occurring) • Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club • Breakaway Academy • Learn to Skate Program • Open Skate & hockey • Developmental skating • Youth & adult hockey leagues • Private rentals Existing Facility Condition The current dehumidification unit in the South Rink is a Munters model desiccant based humidifier that was originally installed in 1997. The existing unit is experiencing blower failure and has reached its useful life. In addition, the unit is currently controlled by Hand/Off/Auto (HOA) controls which are inefficient. With COVID-19, indoor air quality has become a significant concern for facilities, including Braemar Arena. There is and will continue to be a need to ensure a safe environment for staff and users as it relates to air quality. Project Description As part of the city’s capital improvement plan, the dehumidification unit in the South Rink at Braemar Arena is scheduled for replacement in 2021. Due to its rapid failure, it is critical that this project gets completed and that the city find a sustainable solution that can continue to provide ice in a same manner to our users and guests. The new system consists of a desiccant impregnated absorption wheel dehumidifier, regenerating at a high temperature like the existing system. Over the past 24 years, wheel efficiencies have improved, as well as the controls. With a new unit and updated controls the city is able make the overall system more efficient and provide improved air quality by implementing the following: • Keep the existing air distribution system. Reducing supply and return air airflow while keeping the same distribution system sized for a larger airflow will reduce the pressure drop through the ductwork which will result in a significant reduction in fan energy. • The wheel will regenerate with less natural gas energy. • Installation of Bi-polar Ionization effectively killing microorganisms downstream of the bi-polar ionization equipment (mold, bacteria, virus, etc.) • Upgrade the controls to a building automation system. A building automation system (BAS) has been proven to save energy. It will allow for better fine tuning of the system. Also, the new controls will tie in with other automated systems in the arena and provide more efficiencies for staff to regulate the building. • The system will be commissioned by a third-party agent to ensure project specifications are met. Project Budget Nelson-Rudie - Design/construction $35,590.00 Nelson-Rudie - Sustainability Calculation $3,000.00 Cx Agent - CEE $8,500.00 Northern Air Corp. (NAC) base bid $289,900.00 NAC alternate 1 - Bi-Polar Ionization $1,600.00 NAC alternate 2 - Rental DHU service $1,100.00 DHU Total $339,690.00 Rental DHU Costs W.L. Hall - Window removal $2,466.00 W.L. Hall - Window installation $6,000.00 Total Mechanical (estimated) $2,000.00 Muska Electric (estimated) $2,000.00 Rental to 9/30 with Delivery/Pickup $31,900.00 Rental DHU Total $44,366.00 Total Project Cost: $384,056 Operating Budget • The following is a summary of the energy use for each system based on calculations from Nelson-Rudie and Associates, Inc., and using natural gas energy cost of $0.69 / therm, and electrical energy cost of $0.06 /kWh: o Existing Munters unit annual gas usage (Therm; Dollars) = 31,398 $21,664/year o New CDI unit annual gas usage (Therm; Dollars) = 24,620 $16,988/year o Existing Munters unit annual Electrical usage (kWh) = 135,839 $8,185/year o New CDI unit annual Electrical usage (kWh) = 67,322 $4,039 /year • Calculations from Nelson-Rudie and Associates, Inc. show a 22% gas energy reduction, or $4,676 per year, and a 50% electrical energy reduction, or $4,146 for the new CDI unit with respect to the existing Munters unit. Total energy savings of $8,822 per year may be observed. Evaluation Criteria The bi-polar ionization manufacturer shall provide documentation by an independent NELEC accredited laboratory that proves the product has minimum kill rates for the following pathogens given the allotted time and in a space condition: MRSA - >96% in 30 minutes or less E.coli - > 99% in 15 minutes or less TB - > 69% in 60 minutes or less C. diff - >86% in 30 minutes or less Noro Virus -> 93.5% in 30 minutes or less Legionella -> 99.7% in 30 minutes or less In addition, the upgrading of controls to a building automation system will not only save energy but allow for better overall fine tuning of the system which should assist in providing better overall air quality. The City of Edina will match the grant funds 1:1 for a $25,000 match in addition to the other total costs of the project. Date: May 18, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Perry Vetter, Parks and Recreation Director Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Two Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SUV's Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for two 2021 Mitsubishi Outlander P HEV plug-in hybrid SUV's with White Bear Mitsubishi for $64,684. INTRODUCTION: These vehicles, which will be used for the delivery operation, are part of the approved 2021 Capital Improvement Program and are funded by the Edina Liquor enterprise. T he vehicles are part of the replacement schedule and will not increase the allotted fleet. Both vehicles meet the Green Fleet recommendation of better MPG (74 estimated vs 13.9 actual) and less CO2 because they are more efficient than the vehicles being replaced. The vehicles were identified in partnership with the sustainability coordinator. At the May 4, 2021 Council meeting, a purchase request for electric vehicle chargers was approved for the Southdale Liquor Store location. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Two Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV SUV's Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12100102 Department:Edina Liquor - Southdale Buyer:Josh Furbish Date: 05/11/2021 Requisition Description:Edina Liquor Delivery Vehicle Purchase Vendor:WHITE BEAR MITSUBISHI Cost:$64,684.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:NEW - NEW PURCHASE SOURCE:STATE K - STATE CONTRACT DESCRIPTION:New Delivery vehicles meeting Green Fleet policy BUDGET IMPACT: In Budget, Liquor Fund Environmental Impact - item specific: 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:Significant reduction in carbon emissions Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle:Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? YES - YES Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: - MPG: Carbon Emissions: Date: May 18, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Aaron T. Ditzler, PE, Assistant City Engineer Item Activity: Subject:Approve Waterbody Crossing Maintenance Agreement with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Waterbody Crossing Maintenance Agreement with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. INTRODUCTION: As part of the ENG 21-1 Creek Knoll A and B Neighborhood Roadway improvements, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District’s waterbody crossing rule requires a maintenance agreement for installation of a watermain pipe under the creek. Therefore, the City is required to inspect the watermain pipe crossing at least once per year and maintained in good repair in perpetuity. The attached maintenance agreement has been verbally approved by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District staff. ATTACHMENTS: Description Waterbody Crossing Maintenance Agreement with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 1 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Waterbody Crossing Between the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the City of Edina This Maintenance Agreement (Agreement) is made by and between the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, a watershed district with purposes and powers set forth at Minnesota Statutes chapters 103B and 103D (MCWD), and the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota (CITY). Recitals and Statement of Purpose WHEREAS pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 103D.345, the MCWD has adopted and implements the Stormwater Management Rule, Wetland Protection Rule and the Waterbody Crossings & Structures Rule; WHEREAS, under the Waterbody Crossings & Structures Rule, certain land development activity requires the landowner to record a declaration establishing the landowner’s perpetual obligation to inspect and maintain waterbody crossings and structures to ensure that the hydraulic and navigational capacity of the associated waterbody are maintained in accordance with approved plans; WHEREAS in each case, a public landowner, as an alternative to a recorded instrument, may meet the maintenance requirement by documenting its obligations in an unrecorded written agreement with the MCWD; WHEREAS in accordance with the MCWD rules and as a condition of Permit 21-239, the City’s obligation to maintain waterbody crossings must be memorialized by a recorded maintenance declaration or, alternatively, a maintenance agreement establishing the City’s perpetual maintenance obligation; WHEREAS CITY and the MCWD execute this Agreement to fulfill the condition of Permit 21- 239, and concur that it is binding and rests on mutual valuable consideration; THEREFORE CITY and MCWD agree as follows: 1. CITY, at its cost, will inspect and maintain the waterbody crossings as shown in the site plan attached to and incorporated into this Agreement as Exhibit A in perpetuity as follows: A. WATERBODY CROSSINGS & STRUCTURES Crossings and structures in contact with the bed or bank of a waterbody will be inspected at least once a year and maintained in good repair in perpetuity to ensure continuing adequate hydraulic and navigational capacity is retained in accordance with approved plans, to ensure no net increase in the flood stage beyond that achieved by the approved plans, to prevent adverse effects on water quality, changes to the existing flowline/gradient and increased scour, erosion or sedimentation, and to minimize the potential for obstruction of the waterbody. 2 2. If CITY conveys into private ownership a fee interest in the property that is the subject of this Agreement, it shall require as a condition of sale, and enforce: (a) that the purchaser record a declaration on the property incorporating the maintenance requirements of this Agreement; and (b) that recordation occur either before any other encumbrance is recorded on the property or, if after, only as accompanied by a subordination and consent executed by the encumbrance holder ensuring that the declaration will run with the land in perpetuity. If CITY conveys into public ownership a fee interest in any property that has become subject to this Agreement, it shall require as a condition of the purchase and sale agreement that the purchaser accept an assignment of all obligations vested under this Agreement. 3. This Agreement may be amended only in a writing signed by the parties. 4. The recitals are incorporated as a part of this Agreement. (SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS) 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement. MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT By ___________________________________ Date: President, Board of Managers CITY OF CITY By: _______________________________ Date: Its Mayor By: _______________________________ Date: Its Administrator Date: May 18, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Aaron T. Ditzler, PE, Assistant City Engineer Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: W. 54th Street Project and Joint Powers Agreement with City of Minneapolis Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for W. 54th Street pavement for $31,800 and Joint Powers Agreement with City of Minneapolis. INTRODUCTION: West 54th Street is a border street with the Cities of Minneapolis and Edina, and is in the Creek Knoll A& B neighborhood, approved by the Council for neighborhood reconstruction in 2021. The City of Minneapolis and the City of Edina are proposing to enter into a joint powers agreement to share equally some of the construction activities from France Avenue to Zenith Avenue. To ensure a smooth final pavement surface, Minneapolis will be placing the final layer of asphalt for both cities and Edina will reimburse them for the work. See attached for details. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: W. 54th Street Project and Joint Powers Agreement with City of Minneapolis Joint Powers Agreement with City of Minneapolis Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12100099 Department:Engineering Buyer:Aaron Ditzler Date: 05/04/2021 Requisition Description:Request for Purchase: Mpls Joint Powers Agreement Vendor:CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS Cost:$31,800.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:QUOTE/BD - QUOTE/BID DESCRIPTION: West 54th Street is a border street West 54th Street is a border street with the Cities of Minneapolis and Edina, and is in the Creek Knoll A& B neighborhood, approved by the Council for neighborhood reconstruction in 2021. The City of Minneapolis and the City of Edina are proposing to enter into a joint powers agreement to share equally some of the construction activities from France Avenue to Zenith Avenue. To ensure a smooth final pavement surface, Minneapolis will be placing the final layer of asphalt for both cities and Edina will reimburse them for the work. BUDGET IMPACT: The improvements are listed in the 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Plan. 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT: This project will provide premier, long term core service facilities and provide access and mobility for all transportation modes while enhancing safety and convenience. It is necessary to improve the infrastructure and comply with the City’s Living Streets Policy as well as Vision Edina’s mission statement to “provide effective and valued public services and maintain a sound public infrastructure”. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: This project involves rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, upgrades to the storm sewer, localized rehabilitation and full reconstruction of watermain systems, construction of new concrete curb and gutter and sidewalk and complete reconstruction of bituminous pavement surfaces. Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to reuse aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations. This project includes an alternative storm sewer pipe material (High-Density Poly Propylene (HDPP) vs. reinforced concrete). It addresses sustainability by lowering our carbon footprint from manufacturing processes, transportation and installation of the product, while also being more cost effective. This project will reduce impervious surfaces. 1 JOINTPOWERSAGREEMENT 54thStreetWestIMPROVEMENTS FranceAvenueSouthtoZenithAvenueSouth THISAGREEMENTismadeasofthe_____dayof______2021,byandbetweentheCity ofEdina,Minnesota(“Edina”),andtheCityofMinneapolis,Minnesota(“Minneapolis”)both Minnesotamunicipalcorporations. WHEREAS,EdinaandMinneapolisshareacommonboundaryandwishtoundertake streetimprovementson54thStreetWestfromFranceAvenueSouthtoZenithAvenueSouthper ExhibitA;and WHEREAS,Edinaisreconstructingthetheirportionof54thStreetWestontheEdinaside (southside)aspartoftheir2021RoadwayReconstructionImprovements(“Project”). WHEREAS,Minneapolisisresurfacingtheirportionof54thStreetWestonthe Minneapolisside(northside). WHEREAS,thereisadesiretomakeasphaltpavementimprovementson54thStreet West,and WHEREAS,Minn.Stat.§471.59providesforthejointexerciseofcommonorsimilar powersbygovernmentalunitsandprovidesthatanyonegovernmentalunitmayperformon behalfofanothergovernmentalunitanyserviceorfunctionwhichthatunitwouldbeauthorized toperformforitself. NOW,THEREFORE,byvirtueofthepowersgrantedbylawandinconsiderationofthe mutualcovenantsandagreementsofthepartieshereto,itisagreedasfollows: 1. Minneapoliswillperformtheasphaltpavementworkasapartoftheir2021resurfacing program.Edinawillauthorizetheirparticipationintheprojectthroughactionoftheir CityCouncilandbytheirexecutionofthisAgreement. 2. Fortheasphaltpavementworkincludingconstructioninspectionandmaterialstesting shallbeperformedbyMinneapolis,ortheirrepresentative. 3. AnyconcernsbyEdinaregardingtheprogressoftheasphaltpavementworkand administrationoftheworkshallbeimmediatelybroughttotheattentionoftheproject engineerforMinneapolis,LarryMatsumoto,orhisdesignee. 4. AnyconcernsbyMinneapolisregardingthisagreementshallbeimmediatelybroughtto theattentionoftheconstructionengineerforEdina,AaronDitzler,orhisdesignee. 2 5. COSTPARTICIPATION.TheEdinacostparticipation(construction,construction administrationandotheradministrativeexpensesrelatedtotheproject)willnotexceed $31,800exceptbyapprovalintheformofanamendmenttothisagreementauthorized bytheEdinaCityCouncilandexecutedbybothparties. 6. PROJECTCOSTS.ThefinalProjectconstructioncostswillbebasedontheactualexpenses incurred.Finalcontractpaymentshalloccuronlyafterfinalwrittenacceptanceofthe improvementsbyEdina’sauthorizedrepresentative. Minneapoliswillprovidedocumentationofmaterialstestingresultsforthework performedforthisagreementandplacedintheMinneapolisͲEdinarightofway.The materialsplacedshallconformtoapplicableMnDOTstandards.Thesedocumentswillbe reviewedandacceptedbyEdinapriortofinalacceptanceofthework. EdinawillreimburseMinneapolisfortheactualconstructioncostsoftheEdinaportionof theproject.EdinashallreimburseMinneapoliswithin30daysofreceivingtheinvoice. MinneapolisshallmanageanddocumentthesecoststoGovernmentalAccounting StandardsBoard(GASB)standards. 7. RECORDS–AVAILABILITY/ACCESS.SubjecttotherequirementsofMinnesotaStatutes, Section16C.05,Subd.5(asmaybeamended),eachpartyagreesthattheStateAuditor, theLegislativeAuditor,Minneapolis,Edina,oranyoftheirdulyauthorized representatives,atanytimeduringnormalbusinesshours,andasoftenastheymay reasonablydeemnecessary,shallhaveaccesstoandtherighttoexamine,audit,excerpt, andtranscribeanybooks,documents,papers,records,etc.,whicharepertinenttothe accountingpracticesandprocedures,butonlytotheextentthattheyrelatetothis Agreement.Suchmaterialsshallbemaintainedandsuchaccessandrightsshallbeinforce andeffectduringtheperiodofthisAgreementandforsix(6)yearsafteritstermination orcancellation. 8. INDEMNIFICATION.Eachpartyagreestodefendandindemnifytheother,itsofficers, agents,andemployees,forclaimsarisingoutofitsconductorresultingfrombreachof thisAgreement.Nothinghereinshallbedeemedawaiverbyeitherpartyofthe limitationsonliabilitysetforthinMinnesotaStatutes,Chapter466. 9. AUTHORITY.EachCityrepresentsthatitsgoverningbodyhasdulyauthorizedthe executionanddeliveryhereof,andthatuponsuchexecutionanddelivery,thisAgreement willbebindingasagainstsuchparty. 10. MISCELLANEOUSPROVISIONS.ThisAgreementconstitutestheentireagreementofthe partiesonthematterrelatedhereto.ThisAgreementshallnotbealteredoramended, exceptbyagreementinwritingsignedbythepartieshereto.Ifanyprovisionofthis Agreementshallbeheldinvalid,illegal,orunenforceablebyanycourtofcompetent jurisdiction,suchholdingshallnotinvalidateorrenderunenforceableanyotherprovision hereof,andtheremainingprovisionsshallnotinanywaybeaffectedorimpairedthereby. ThisAgreementmaybesimultaneouslyexecutedinseveralcounterparts,eachofwhich 3 shallbeanyoriginalandallofwhichshallconstitutebutoneandthesameinstrument. ThisAgreementshallbeconstruedinaccordancewiththelawsoftheStateofMinnesota. 11. TERMINATION.ThisAgreementshallterminatewiththeexpirationoftheproject warranties,oroneyearaftertheagreementdate,whicheverislater. INWITNESSWHEREOF,thepartiesheretobytheirauthorizedrepresentativeshereunto settheirhandsasofthedayanddatefirstabovewritten. CITYOFMINNEAPOLISCITYOFEDINA Approved ______________________ By: __________ Department Head responsible for It’s Mayor Contract Monitoring for this contract Dated:_________________ Andby: ____ It’s City Manager Countersigned: ______________________ Dated:_________________ Finance Officer Designee Approved as to Form: By: ________________________________ Assistant City Attorney CityofEdinaScopeofWork(southhalfofWest54thStreet);NoCostSharing: 1. Existingasphaltpavementandaggregatebasereclamation 2. Minimalstormsewerimprovements 3. Excavationandsubgradeexcavationifnecessary 4. Reclaimaggregatebaseinstallation 5. Concretecurbandgutterinstallation 6. Drivewayrestoration 7. 2”asphaltpavement(initiallayer) 8. Topsoilandturfrestoration CityofMinneapolisScopeofWork(northhalfofWest54thStreet);NoCostSharing: 1. 2”Millandoverlay 2. Minimalmiscellaneousconcreterepairs 3. Minimalstormsewerimprovements Minneapolisscopeofwork(West54thStreet);50/50CostSharing: 1. Asphalttackcoat 2. 2”asphaltpavement(finallayer) 3. Crosswalkpavementmarkings 4. Constructioninspection,administrationandmaterialsinspectionofasphaltpavementand pavementmarkings Exhibit A Date: May 18, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.G. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: City Hall Water Heater Replacement Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for City Hall Water Heater Replacement with Gilbert Mechanical for $31,263. INTRODUCTION: The two water heaters at City Hall are original to the building and are failing. See attached request for purchase for details. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: City Hall Water Heater Replacement Contract Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12100098 Department:Engineering Buyer:Derik Otten Date: 05/04/2021 Requisition Description:City Hall Water Heater Replacement Vendor:GILBERT MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS LLC Cost:$31,263.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:QUOTE/BD - QUOTE/BID DESCRIPTION: 2 Electric Water Heaters to replace 2 Natural Gas Water Heaters Edina City Hall currently has (2) Natural Gas Domestic Water Heaters that serve the building. Each has an input capacity of 160,000 Btu/hr.The existing Natural Gas fired water heaters are original to the building and are 16 years old. One of the water heaters is in need of immediate replacement and the other will need to be replaced shortly. BUDGET IMPACT: Funded from City Hall Building Operating Fund & CAS Funds 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Conversion to Electric models lowers Greenhouse Gas Emissions Staff reviewed the environmental impacts of gas fired water heaters, electric water heaters and electric heat pump waters prior to selected replacement equipment. The analysis found the the electric water heaters best advances the City's goals of GHG reductions over the long term. APRIL 2018 A-1 IB CONTRACT NO. FC 21-03. THIS AGREEMENT made this 26th day of April 2021, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”) and Gilbert Mechanical Contractors LLC (“Contractor”). City and Contractor, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, agree as follows: 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the “Contract Documents,” all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Agreement. B. Instructions to Bidders. C. City of Edina General Contract Conditions. D. Addenda numbers E. Specifications prepared by F. Plan sheets numbered G. Performance Bond. H. Payment Bond. I. Responsible Contractor Verification of Compliance J. Contractor’s revised bid dated April 24th, 2021 K. Scope of Work The Contractor at a minimum shall provide the following services: Removal and disposal of 2 existing gas fired commercial water heaters. Removal of all associated ventilation and exhaust ductwork and piping to roof line. Capping piping at roof penetration. Roof Repairs by City of Edina Removal of all associated gas piping back to main line connection point. Cap at connection point. Supply and Install 2 new Electric Water Heaters including all necessary wiring, power, and devices from designated panel to units. New 75-amp Breakers at panel with frames & load plugs. Necessary Crane/hoist with rigging and traffic control plan. ($650.00 added to base bid) All permits, fees and inspections required by code. The Contract Documents are to be read and interpreted as a whole. The intent of the Contract Documents is to include all items necessary for the proper execution and completion of the Work and to require Contractor to provide the highest quality and greatest quantity consistent with the Contract Documents. If there are inconsistencies within or among part of the Contract Documents or between the Contract Documents and applicable standards, codes or ordinances, the Contractor shall provide the better quality or greater quantity of Work or comply with the more stringent requirements. APRIL 2018 A-2 IB 1.1 Before ordering any materials or doing any Work, the Contractor shall verify measurements at the Project site and shall be responsible for the correctness of such measurements. No extra charges or compensation will be allowed on account of differences between actual dimensions and the dimensions indicated on the Drawings. Any difference that may be found shall be submitted to the City for resolution before proceeding with the Work. 1.2 If a minor change in the Work is necessary due to actual field conditions, the Contractor shall submit detailed drawings of such departure to the City for approval before making the change. The City shall not be required to make any adjustment to either the Contract Sum or Contract Time because of any failure by the Contractor to comply with the requirements of this paragraph. Actual or alleged conflicts or inconsistencies between the Plans and Specifications or other Contract Documents shall be brought to the City’s attention in writing, prior to performing the affected Work. The City’s directions shall be followed by the Contractor. 2. OBLIGATIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR. The Contractor shall provide the goods, services, and perform the work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 3. OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY. The City agrees to pay, and the Contractor agrees to receive and accept payment in accordance with the Contractor’s bid $31,263.00. 4. PAYMENT PROCEDURES. A. Contractor shall submit Applications for Payment. Applications for Payment will be processed by City as provided in the General Conditions. B. Progress Payments; Retainage. City shall make 95% progress payments on account of the Contract Price on the basis of Contractor’s Applications for Payment during performance of the Work. C. Payments to Subcontractor. (1) Prompt Payment to Subcontractors. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 471.25, Subd. 4a, the Contractor must pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of the Contractor’s receipt of payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. The Contractor must pay interest of 1½ percent per month or any part of a month to the subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100.00 or more is $10.00. For an unpaid balance of less than $100.00, the Contractor shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor. (2) Form IC-134 required from general contractor. Minn. Stat. § 290.92 requires that the City of Edina obtain a Withholding Affidavit for Contractors, Form IC-134, before making final payments to Contractors. This form needs to be submitted by the Contractor to the Minnesota Department of Revenue for approval. The form is used to receive certification from the state that the vendor has complied with the requirement to withhold and remit state withholding taxes for employee salaries paid. D. Final Payment. Upon final completion of the Work, City shall pay the remainder of the Contract Price as recommended by City. 5. COMPLETION DATE. The Work must be completed and ready for final payment by July 1st, 2021. 6. CONTRACTOR’S REPRESENTATIONS. APRIL 2018 A-3 IB A. Contractor has examined and carefully studied the Contract Documents and other related data identified in the Contract Documents. B. Contractor has visited the Site and become familiar with and is satisfied as to the general, local, and Site conditions that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. C. Contractor is familiar with and is satisfied as to all federal, state, and local Laws and Regulations that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. D. Contractor has carefully studied all: (1) reports of explorations and tests of subsurface conditions at or contiguous to the Site and all drawings of physical conditions in or relating to existing surface or subsurface structures at or contiguous to the Site (except Underground Facilities) which have been identified in the General Conditions; and (2) reports and drawings of a Hazardous Environmental Condition, if any, at the Site. E. Contractor has obtained and carefully studied (or assumes responsibility for doing so) all additional or supplementary examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data concerning conditions (surface, subsurface, and underground facilities) at or contiguous to the Site which may affect cost, progress, or performance of the Work or which relate to any aspect of the means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction to be employed by Contractor, including any specific means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction expressly required by the Bidding Documents, and safety precautions and programs incident thereto. F. Contractor does not consider that any further examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, or data are necessary for the performance of the Work at the Contract Price, within the Contract Times, and in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Contract Documents. G. Contractor is aware of the general nature of work to be performed by City and others at the Site that relates to the Work as indicated in the Contract Documents. H. Contractor has correlated the information known to Contractor, information and observations obtained from visits to the Site, reports and drawings identified in the Contract Documents, and all additional examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data with the Contract Documents. I. Contractor has given City written notice of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities, or discrepancies that Contractor has discovered in the Contract Documents, and the written resolution thereof by City is acceptable to Contractor. J. The Contract Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for performance and furnishing of the Work. K. Subcontracts: (1) Unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents, the Contractor shall, upon receipt of the executed Contract Documents, submit in writing to the City the names of the subcontractors proposed for the work. Subcontractors may not be changed except at the request or with the consent of the City. (2) The Contractor is responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of the Contractor's subcontractors, and of their direct and indirect employees, to the same extent as the Contractor is responsible for the acts and omissions of the Contractor's employees. (3) The Contract Documents shall not be construed as creating any contractual relation between the City and any subcontractor. (4) The Contractor shall bind every subcontractor by the terms of the Contract Documents. APRIL 2018 A-4 IB 7. WARRANTY. The Contractor guarantees that all new equipment warranties as specified within the bid shall be in full force and transferred to the City upon payment by the City. The Contractor shall be held responsible for any and all defects in workmanship, materials, and equipment which may develop in any part of the contracted service, and upon proper notification by the City shall immediately replace, without cost to the City, any such faulty part or parts and damage done by reason of the same in accordance with the bid specifications. 8. INDEMNITY. The Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from any claim made by third parties as a result of the services performed by it. In addition, the Contractor shall reimburse the City for any cost of reasonable attorney’s fees it may incur as a result of any such claims. 9. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Terms used in this Agreement have the meanings stated in the General Conditions. B. City and Contractor each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other party hereto, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives in respect to all covenants, agreements, and obligations contained in the Contract Documents. C. Any provision or part of the Contract Documents held to be void or unenforceable under any Law or Regulation shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon City and Contractor, who agree that the Contract Documents shall be reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and enforceable provision that comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provisions. D. Data Practices/Records. (1) All data created, collected, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose in the course of this Contract is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, any other applicable state statute, or any state rules adopted to implement the act, as well as federal regulations on data privacy. (2) All books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices to the Contractor and its subcontractors, if any, relative to this Contract are subject to examination by the City. E. Copyright/Patent. Contractor shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or patent by reason of the use or adoption of any designs, drawings or specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the City from loss or damage resulting there from. If the equipment provided by the Contractor pursuant to this Agreement contains software, including that which the manufacturer may have embedded into the hardware as an integral part of the equipment, the Contractor shall pay all software licensing fees. The Contractor shall also pay for all software updating fees for a period of one year following cutover. The Contractor shall have no obligation to pay for such fees thereafter. Nothing in the software license or licensing agreement shall obligate the City to pay any additional fees as a condition for continuing to use the software. F. Assignment. Neither party may assign, sublet, or transfer any interest or obligation in this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party, and then only upon such terms and conditions as both parties may agree to and set forth in writing. G. Waiver. In the particular event that either party shall at any time or times waive any breach of this Agreement by the other, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or any succeeding breach of this Agreement by either party, whether of the same or any other covenant, condition or obligation. H. Governing Law/Venue. The laws of the State of Minnesota govern the interpretation of this Agreement. In the event of litigation, the exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for Hennepin County. APRIL 2018 A-5 IB I. Severability. If any provision, term or condition of this Agreement is found to be or becomes unenforceable or invalid, it shall not affect the remaining provisions, terms and conditions of this Agreement, unless such invalid or unenforceable provision, term or condition renders this Agreement impossible to perform. Such remaining terms and conditions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and shall continue to operate as the parties’ entire agreement. J. Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire agreement of the parties and is a final, complete and all inclusive statement of the terms thereof, and supersedes and terminates any prior agreement(s), understandings or written or verbal representations made between the parties with respect thereto. K. Permits and Licenses; Rights-of-Way and Easements. The Contractor shall procure all permits and licenses, pay all charges and fees therefore, and give all notices necessary and incidental to the construction and completion of the Project. The City will obtain all necessary rights-of-way and easements. The Contractor shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for any construction delay resulting from the City’s not timely obtaining rights-of-way or easements. L. If the work is delayed or the sequencing of work is altered because of the action or inaction of the City, the Contractor shall be allowed a time extension to complete the work but shall not be entitled to any other compensation. M. Responsible Contractor. This contract may be terminated by the City at any time upon discovery by the City that the prime contractor or subcontractor has submitted a false statement under oath verifying compliance with any of the minimum criteria set forth in Minn Stat. § 16C.285, subd. 3. CITY OF EDINA BY: ____________________________ BY: ____________________________ City Manager Its AND ___________________________ Its Gilbert Mechanical Contractors, LLC EVP - Capital Projects APRIL 2018 D-1 IB Date: May 18, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.H. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Noah Silver, Electrical/HVAC Supervisor Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase Change Order: Voice Evacuation System Braemar Arena CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase Change Order for Voice Evacuation System at Braemar Arena with Life Safety Systems for $22,615. INTRODUCTION: During the Braemar Arena Voice Evacuation and Fire System Upgrade project, non-code compliant wiring was discovered. In addition, the Fire Department requested additional carbon monoxide monitoring in mechanical areas and ammonia leak detection with notification for all three rinks. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase Change Order: Voice Evacuation System Braemar Arena Request for Purchase Purchase Order 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 22100016 Department: Engineering Buyer: Noah Silver Date: 05/18/2021 Requisition Description: Braemar Arena Voice Evacuation System - Request for Change Vendor: LIFE SAFTEY SYSTEMS INC. Cost: $22,615.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:NEW - NEW PURCHASE SOURCE:QUOTE/BD - QUOTE/BID DESCRIPTION: Voice Evacuation System - Contract Change Order During the Braemar Arena Voice Evacuation and Fire System Upgrade project, non-code compliant wiring was encountered. In addition, the Fire Department requested additional CO monitoring in mechanical areas and ammonia leak detection with notification for all three rinks. The Request for Change document (RFC) is attached with this Request for Purchase. Request for Change #1 - Repairs and replacement of wiring was needed in various sections of the building in order to comply with National Electrical Code (NEC). Locations and details of additional work listed in RFC. - $4,665.00 Request for Change #2 - Fire Department's request of additional CO monitoring in mechanical areas with gas fired appliances and ammonia leak detection for all three rinks. Locations and details of additional work listed in RFC. - $17,950.00 BUDGET IMPACT: The oringal contract was funded from CIP Project# P&R21008 CIP Levy. The referenced change order will be funding from CIP #ENG21000 Asset Preservation Funding. Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? - Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: - MPG: Carbon Emissions: Date: May 18, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.I. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Jessica V. Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project Ecological Support Services Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project Ecological Support Services with Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC (RES) for $33,773 over 2 years. INTRODUCTION: The City agreed to assume maintenance of the Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District when it approved the project maintenance plan in spring of 2020 (attached for reference). The support services contract is for site inspections, bid development, and construction oversight for 2021 and 2022. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project Ecological Support Services Contract Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project Maintenance Plan Agreement Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12100106 Department: Engineering Buyer: Jessica Vanderwerff Wilso Date: 05/11/2021 Requisition Description: ENG 21-9NB Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project Ecological Support Service Vendor: RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC Cost: $33,773.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:NEW - NEW PURCHASE SOURCE:SERVIC K - SERVICE CONTRACT DESCRIPTION: ENG 21-9NB Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project Ecological Support Services The City agreed to assume maintenance of the Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District when it approved the project maintenance plan in spring of 2020. The support services contract is for site inspections, bid development, and construction oversight for 2021 and 2022. BUDGET IMPACT: Stormwater Utility CIP#ENG21057 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT: Site inspections and maintenance of the Nine Mile Creek Streambank Project will ensure the investment made for streambank stabilization and clean water features last in the long term. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Managed natural areas reduce erosion and invasive species. 140400v01 RNK:08/06/2010 Engineering 2/7/2014 FORM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF EDINA AND CONTRACTOR FOR NON-BID CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT made this 18th day of May, 2021, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“Owner” or “City”) and Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC (RES) (“Contractor”). Owner and Contractor, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, agree as follows: 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the “Contract Documents”, all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Agreement. B. City of Edina General Contract Conditions C. Contractor’s Proposal. In the event of a conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts with Contract Document “A” having the first priority and Contract Document “C” having the last priority. 2. OBLIGATIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR. The Contractor shall provide the goods, services, and perform the work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 3. CONTRACT PRICE. Owner shall pay Contractor for completion of the Work, in accordance with the Contract $33,773 inclusive of taxes, if any. 4. PAYMENT PROCEDURES. A. Contractor shall submit Applications for Payment. Applications for Payment will be processed by the City Engineer. B. Progress Payments; Retainage. Owner shall make 95% progress payments on account of the Contract Price on the basis of Contractor’s Applications for Payment during performance of the Work. C. Payments to Subcontractors. (1) Prompt Payment to Subcontractors. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 471.25, Subd. 4a, the Contractor must pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of the Contractor’s receipt of payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. The Contractor must pay interest of 1 ½ percent per month or any part of a month to the subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100.00 or more is 140400v01 RNK:08/06/2010 Engineering 2/7/2014 $10.00. For an unpaid balance of less than $100.00, the Contractor shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor. (2) Form IC-134 (attached) required from general contractor. Minn. Stat. § 290.92 requires that the City of Edina obtain a Withholding Affidavit for Contractors, Form IC-134, before making final payments to Contractors. This form needs to be submitted by the Contractor to the Minnesota Department of Revenue for approval. The form is used to receive certification from the state that the vendor has complied with the requirement to withhold and remit state withholding taxes for employee salaries paid. D. Final Payment. Final payment will not be made until the Contractor has filed with the Owner a fully and duly executed Affidavit, General Waiver and Indemnity Agreement, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B and hereby made a part hereof, together with such other and additional evidence as Owner may request, in form and substance satisfactory to the Owner, that all labor, materials and services expended or used in the Work have been paid for in full and that no liens or other claims for such labor, materials or services can be made or claimed against Contractor, Owner or any other person or any property. In case such evidence is not furnished, the Owner may retain out of any amount due said Contractor a sum sufficient, in the reasonable discretion of Owner, but in any event not less than one and one-half times the sum determined by Owner to be necessary, to pay for all labor, material, services or other claims which are then unpaid or which are then believed by Owner, in its reasonable discretion, to be unpaid. Upon final completion of the Work, Owner shall pay the remainder of the Contract Price as recommended by the City Engineer. 5. COMPLETION DATE. The Work must be completed by December 31, 2022. 6. CONTRACTOR’S REPRESENTATIONS. A. Contractor has examined and carefully studied the Contract Documents and other related data identified in the Contract Documents. B. Contractor has visited the Site and become familiar with and is satisfied as to the general, local, and Site conditions that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. C. Contractor is familiar with and is satisfied as to all federal, state, and local laws and regulations that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. D. Contractor has carefully studied all: (1) reports of explorations and tests of subsurface conditions at or contiguous to the Site and all drawings of physical conditions in or relating to existing surface or subsurface structures at or contiguous to the Site (except Underground Facilities) 140400v01 RNK:08/06/2010 Engineering 2/7/2014 which have been identified in the General Conditions and (2) reports and drawings of a Hazardous Environmental Condition, if any, at the Site. E. Contractor has obtained and carefully studied (or assumes responsibility for doing so) all additional or supplementary examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data concerning conditions (surface, subsurface, and Underground Facilities) at or contiguous to the Site which may affect cost, progress, or performance of the Work or which relate to any aspect of the means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction to be employed by Contractor, including any specific means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction expressly required by the Bidding Documents, and safety precautions and programs incident thereto. F. Contractor does not consider that any further examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, or data are necessary for the performance of the Work at the Contract Price, within the Contract Times, and in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Contract Documents. G. Contractor is aware of the general nature of work to be performed by Owner and others at the Site that relates to the Work as indicated in the Contract Documents. H. Contractor has correlated the information known to Contractor, information and observations obtained from visits to the Site, reports and drawings identified in the Contract Documents, and all additional examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data with the Contract Documents. I. The Contract Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for performance and furnishing of the Work. J. Subcontracts: (1) Unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents, the Contractor shall, upon receipt of the executed Contract Documents, submit in writing to the Owner the names of the Subcontractors proposed for the work. Subcontractors may not be changed except at the request or with the consent of the Owner. (2) The Contractor is responsible to the Owner for the acts and omissions of the Contractor's subcontractors, and of their direct and indirect employees, to the same extent as the Contractor is responsible for the acts and omissions of the Contractor's employees. (3) The Contract Documents shall not be construed as creating any contractual relation between the Owner and any subcontractor. 140400v01 RNK:08/06/2010 Engineering 2/7/2014 (4) The Contractor shall bind every subcontractor by the terms of the Contract Documents. 7. WORKER’S COMPENSATION. The Contractor shall obtain and maintain for the duration of this Contract, statutory Worker’s Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance as required under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 8. COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY. Contractor shall obtain the following minimum insurance coverage and maintain it at all times throughout the life of the Contract, with the City included as an additional name insured on the general liability insurance on a primary and noncontributory basis. The Contractor shall furnish the City a certificate of insurance satisfactory to the City evidencing the required coverage: Bodily Injury: $1,000,000 each occurrence $1,000,000 aggregate products and completed operations Property Damage: $1,000,000 each occurrence $1,000,000 aggregate Contractual Liability (identifying the contract): Bodily Injury: $1,000,000 each occurrence Property Damage: $1,000,000 each occurrence $1,000,000 aggregate Comprehensive Automobile Liability (owned, non-owned, hired): Bodily Injury: $1,000,000 each occurrence $1,000,000 each accident Property Damage: $1,000,000 each occurrence 9. WARRANTY. The Contractor guarantees that all new equipment warranties as specified within the quote shall be in full force and transferred to the City upon payment by the City. The Contractor shall be held responsible for any and all defects in workmanship, materials, and equipment which may develop in any part of the contracted service, and upon proper notification by the City shall immediately replace, without cost to the City, any such faulty part or parts and damage done by reason of the same in accordance with the bid specifications. 10. INDEMNITY. The Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from any claim made by third parties as a result of the services performed by it. In addition, the Contractor shall reimburse the City for any cost of reasonable attorney’s fees it may incur as a result of any such claims. 11. PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS. Performance and payment bonds are not required for the doing of any public work if the contract price is $100,000 or less. On projects of more than $100,000 for the doing of public work a payment bond and a performance bond each in the amount of the contract price must be furnished to the City prior to 140400v01 RNK:08/06/2010 Engineering 2/7/2014 commencement of work. The form of the bonds must satisfy statutory requirements for such bonds. 12. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Terms used in this Agreement have the meanings stated in the General Conditions. B. Owner and Contractor each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other party hereto, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives in respect to all covenants, agreements, and obligations contained in the Contract Documents. C. Any provision or part of the Contract Documents held to be void or unenforceable under any law or regulation shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon Owner and Contractor, who agree that the Contract Documents shall be reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and enforceable provision that comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provisions. D. Data Practices/Records. (1) All data created, collected, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose in the course of this Contract is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, any other applicable state statute, or any state rules adopted to implement the act, as well as federal regulations on data privacy. (2) All books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices to the Contractor and its subcontractors, if any, relative to this Contract are subject to examination by the City. E. Software License. If the equipment provided by the Contractor pursuant to this Contract contains software, including that which the manufacturer may have embedded into the hardware as an integral part of the equipment, the Contractor shall pay all software licensing fees. The Contractor shall also pay for all software updating fees for a period of one year following cutover. The Contractor shall have no obligation to pay for such fees thereafter. Nothing in the software license or licensing agreement shall obligate the City to pay any additional fees as a condition for continuing to use the software. F. Patented devices, materials and processes. If the Contract requires, or the Contractor desires, the use of any design, device, material or process covered by letters, patent or copyright, trademark or trade name, the Contractor shall provide for such use by suitable legal agreement with the patentee or owner and a copy of said agreement shall be filed with the Owner. If no such agreement is made or filed as noted, the Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the Owner from any and all claims for infringement by reason of the use of any such patented designed, device, 140400v01 RNK:08/06/2010 Engineering 2/7/2014 material or process, or any trademark or trade name or copyright in connection with the Project agreed to be performed under the Contract, and shall indemnify and defend the Owner for any costs, liability, expenses and attorney's fees that result from any such infringement. G. Assignment. Neither party may assign, sublet, or transfer any interest or obligation in this Contract without the prior written consent of the other party, and then only upon such terms and conditions as both parties may agree to and set forth in writing. H. Waiver. In the particular event that either party shall at any time or times waive any breach of this Contract by the other, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or any succeeding breach of this Contract by either party, whether of the same or any other covenant, condition or obligation. I. Governing Law/Venue. The laws of the State of Minnesota govern the interpretation of this Contract. In the event of litigation, the exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for Hennepin County. J. Severability. If any provision, term or condition of this Contract is found to be or become unenforceable or invalid, it shall not effect the remaining provisions, terms and conditions of this Contract, unless such invalid or unenforceable provision, term or condition renders this Contract impossible to perform. Such remaining terms and conditions of the Contract shall continue in full force and effect and shall continue to operate as the parties’ entire contract. K. Entire Agreement. This Contract represents the entire agreement of the parties and is a final, complete and all inclusive statement of the terms thereof, and supersedes and terminates any prior agreement(s), understandings or written or verbal representations made between the parties with respect thereto. L. Permits and Licenses; Rights-of-Way and Easements. The Contractor shall give all notices necessary and incidental to the construction and completion of the Project. The City will obtain all necessary rights-of- way and easements. The Contractor shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for any construction delay resulting from the City’s not timely obtaining rights-of-way or easements. M. If the work is delayed or the sequencing of work is altered because of the action or inaction of the Owner, the Contractor shall be allowed a time extension to complete the work but shall not be entitled to any other compensation. 140400v01 RNK:08/06/2010 Engineering 2/7/2014 CITY OF EDINA CONTRACTOR BY: ____________________________ BY: ___________________________ Its Mayor Its AND ___________________________ AND ___________________________ Its City Manager Its Date: May 18, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.J. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Kelly Curtin, Human Resources Director Item Activity: Subject:Approve 2021-2022 Union Contract for IAFF Local 1275 for Firefighters Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the Tentative Agreement for the 2021-2022 union contract for IAFF Local 1275 for Firefighters. INTRODUCTION: The attached Tentative Agreement has been negotiated in good faith by City and Union leadership, and the union has voted to approve this contract. The last step in the process is approval by the City Council. Substantive changes to this contract include: 3% Wage Increase for 2021 2% Wage Increase for 2022 Drop Step One of Salary Schedule for all groups, excludes Captains Added incentive pay of $1800/year for an Inspector temporarily assigned to Plan Review Adopt pay plan for Fire Captains Minor clarifying or grammatical changes to current language The recommended changes are consistent with the City's pay plan and market comparisons. Staff recommends approval of this contract. ATTACHMENTS: Description Tentative Agreement 2021-2022 City and IAFF Local 1275 Current City and IAFF Local 1275 Contract City of Edina and IAFF, Local No. 1275 April 29, 2021 Tentative Agreement 1. Article 23. Duration. January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2022. 2. Article 25 and Appendix A. Salary Schedule. Adjust as follows: • Strike Step One/Year One of the Firefighters wage scale 2021 • Three percent (3%) general adjustment effective 1/1/2021 2022 • Two percent (2%) general adjustment effective 1/1/2022 • Drop Step 1 of all groups except Captain and Firefighter effective 1/1/2022 • Incumbents employed by the City as of 1/1/2022 who are below the top step will receive the following adjustments: o 1/1/2022 – one step o Anniversary date (if employee is still not at the top step) – one step 3. Enter into a Memorandum of Agreement as follows: The parties agree that, in the event that the City determines to utilize the pay plan for Firefighters listed in Appendix A-1, the City will notify the Association of this intent. Upon this notification, the Association may request and the parties agree to meet and negotiate on the limited issue of the years and amounts listed on the Appendix A-1 pay plan applicable to Firefighters. 4. Enter into a Memorandum of Agreement as follows: The parties agree that an Inspector temporarily assigned to and performing Plan Review will receive $1,800 ($0.87 per hour for 40 hour per week employees) for the period of this temporary assignment. 5. Appendix A. Salary Schedule. Adopt the attached pay plan for Fire Captains. Note this pay plan was developed as follows: • Uses 2020 nonunion pay plan as a base plan with 6 steps • Adds $570.70 to each annual step to reflect coordination of nonunion and union certification and education incentives. • Captains will be added as a classification eligible for the Paramedic Certification Pay on the same basis as Lieutenants and Inspectors. • Captains will be added as a classification eligible for the Education Incentive Pay on the same basis as all Job Classifications. • The following language will be added: Individuals promoted to Fire Captain will receive a pay adjustment to the closest step in the Fire Captain pay plan that exceeds five percent (5%) of the employee’s current base pay rate including longevity but excluding paramedic and supplemental pay. 6. Article 25. Longevity and Educational Incentive. Note that: • Captains will not be eligible for longevity pay. 7. Article 2. Recognition. Add Fire Captain. 8. Article 28. Injury in Line of Duty. Revise the language as follows: 28.1 Employees injured while on duty shall be paid the difference between the Employee's regular rate of pay and any Workers’ Compensation benefits for a period not to exceed ninety (90) calendar days per injury. The Employee has the option to endorse their Workers’ Compensation check to the City, however they are not required to do so. In the case that the compensation is endorsed to the City, it will be reimbursed to the Employee at full regular pay on the employee’s paycheck. Such time shall not be charged against the Employee's sick or vacation leave. 9. Article 10. Seniority. 10.6 Employee on lay off shall be responsible to maintain any required certifications and/or licenses (National Registry, Fire Inspector, etc.) necessary for the entry level of said position when laid off, any expenses incurred while laid off shall be the individuals responsibility. 10. City will notify employees of their benefits each year that will include the conversion rates. 11. Fix Grammatical errors. 12. Identify wages utilizing 4th decimal point. 2169530_1 MASTER LABOR AGREEMENT between THE CITY OF EDINA and INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL NO. 1275 JANUARY I, 2019 to DECEMBER 31, 2020 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2019 January 1, 2019- INDEX ARTICLE PAGE I PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT 3 2 RECOGNITION 3 3 DEFINITIONS 3 4 EMPLOYER SECURITY 4 5 EMPLOYER AUTHORITY 4 6 ASSOCIATION SECURITY 5 7 ASSOCIATION BUSINESS 5 8 EMPLOYEE RIGHTS-GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 6 9 SAVINGS CLAUSE 8 10 SENIORITY 8 II WORK SCHEDULES 9 12 OVERTIME PAY 9 13 CALL-BACK TIME 10 14 SHIFT EXCHANGE 10 15 DISCIPLINE 10 16 PROBATIONARY PERIOD II 17 SICK LEAVE WITH PAY II 18 WORKING OUT OF CLASSIFICATION II 19 VACATION 12 20 HOLIDAYS 13 21 UNIFORMS 14 22 FITNESS INCENTIVE 14 23 INSURANCE 15 24 WAIVER 15 25 LONGEVITY AND EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE 15 26 PARAMEDIC CERTIFICATION INCENTIVE 16 27 SPECIALTIY CERTIFICATION INCENTIVE 16 28 INJURY IN LINE OF DUTY 16 29 FUNERAL LEAVE 17 30 SEVERANCE PAY 17 31 PROMOTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES 17 32 CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE AND ALCOHOL TESTING 18 33 DURATION 18 34 LICENSURE 18 APPENDIX A-1 SALARY SCHEDULE I9 APPENDIX A-2 POLICY FOR A HEALTH CARE SAVINGS PLAN 2 I Page 2 of 21 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2019 ARTICLE I PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between the City of Edina, hereinafter called Employer, and Local No. 1275, International Association of Firefighters, hereinafter called the Association. The intent and purpose of this Agreement is to: 1.1 Establish certain hours, wages and other conditions of employment; 1.2 Establish procedures for the resolution of disputes concerning this Agreement's interpretation and/or application; 1.3 Place in written form the parties' full and complete Agreement upon the terms and conditions of employment specified and for the duration of this Agreement. ARTICLE 2 RECOGNITION The Employer recognizes the Association as the exclusive representative under Minnesota Statutes, Section 179.71, Subd. 3 for the following job classifications; Firefighter Firefighter/Inspector Firefighter/Lieutenant Firefighter/Paramedic ARTICLE 3 DEFINITIONS 3.1 Association: The International Association of Firefighters, Local No. 1275. 3.2 Employer: The City of Edina. 3.3 Association Member: A member of the International Association of Firefighters, Local No. 1275. 3.4 Employee: A member of the formally recognized bargaining unit. 3.5 Base Pay Rate: The employee's biweekly pay rate, inclusive of the paramedic certification incentive (for inspectors and lieutenants), longevity or educational incentive. 3.6 Hourly Pay Rate: The Employee's pay rate calculated on an hourly basis as in Appendix A. 3.7 Work Week: The maximum hours worked per week shall be an average of 55.85 hours for 121 annual scheduled shifts, 56.31 hours for 122 annual scheduled shifts, and 56.76 for 123 annual scheduled shifts. 3.8 Overtime Pay: One and one-half times the Employee's base pay rate calculated on an hourly basis using the normal work week of the Employee in the computations. 3.9 Acting Officer: A temporary job assignment that is used as defined in Article 18 of this Page 3 of 21 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2019 document. 3.10 Promotion: Promotion is defined as the advancement of an Employee to a higher paying job classification or position and shall not include temporary assignments of personnel for training. 3.1 1 Association Executive Board shall be made up of the current elected President, Vice President and Secretary/Treasurer. ARTICLE 4 EMPLOYER SECURITY 4.1 The Association agrees that during the life of the Agreement, it will not cause, encourage, participate in or support any strike, slow-down or other interruption of, or interference with, the normal functions of the Employer. 4.2 Any Employee who engages in a strike shall have their appointment or employment terminated by the Employer effective the date the violation first occurs. Such termination shall be effective upon written notice served upon the Employee by registered mail. 4.3 An Employee who is absent from any portion of their work assignment without permission, or who abstains wholly or in part from the full performance of their duties without permission from the Employer on the date or dates when a strike occurs is prima facie presumed to have engaged in a strike on such date or dates. 4.4 An Employee who knowingly strikes and whose employment has been terminated for such action may, subsequent to such violation, be appointed or reappointed or employed or re-employed, but the Employee shall be on probation for two years with respect to such employment status, tenure of employment of contract of employment, as the Employee may have theretofore been entitled. 4.5 No Employee shall be entitled to any daily pay, wages, or per diem for the days on which an Employee engaged in a strike. ARTICLE 5 EMPLOYER AUTHORITY 5.1 The Employer retains full and unrestricted right to operate and manage all staffing, facilities and equipment; to establish functions and programs; to set and amend budgets; to determine the utilization of technology; to establish and modify the organization structure; to select, direct and determine the number of personnel; to establish work schedules and to perform any inherent managerial function not specifically limited by this Agreement. 5.2 The rights and authority which the Employer has not officially abridged delegated or modified by this Agreement, are retained by the Employer. Page 4 of 21 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2019 ARTICLE 6 ASSOCIATION SECURITY 6.1 The Employer shall deduct from the wages of Employees who authorize such deduction in writing an amount necessary to cover monthly Association dues. Such monies shall be remitted as directed by the Association. 6.2 The Association shall designate Employees from the bargaining unit to act as President, Vice President, Secretary/Treasurer, and three (3) Shift Stewards. The Association shall inform the Employer in writing of such choices and any changes in President, Vice President, Secretary/Treasurer and Shift Stewards. 6.3 The Employer shall make space available on the Employee bulletin board for posting Association notice(s) and announcement(s). 6.4 The Association agrees to indemnify and hold the Employer harmless against any and all claims, suits, orders or judgments brought or issued against the City as a result of any action taken or not taken by the City under the provision of this Article. ARTICLE 7 ASSOCIATION BUSINESS 7.1 It is recognized and accepted by the Association and the Employer that the conduct of the Association business is limited to the job duties and responsibilities of the Employee and shall, therefore, be accomplished during normal working hours only when consistent with such Employee duties and responsibilities. The Employer shall permit a maximum of three (3) Association representatives a reasonable amount of time off with pay to conduct negotiations with the Employer when such negotiations are conducted during their normal working hours, provided that the Association has notified and received the approval of the designated supervisor who has determined that such absence is reasonable and would not be detrimental to the work program of the Employer. 7.2 The Employer agrees to permit the Association to hold a reasonable number of Association business meetings per year of no more than two (2) hours duration each in the City Fire Station, 6250 Tracy Avenue, provided the Association has notified and received approval of the designated supervisor who has determined that such meeting is at a reasonable time and would not be detrimental to the work program of the Employer. On-duty Employees will be permitted to attend said Association meetings provided such attendance is not detrimental to the work program of the Employer. The Association agrees that should an emergency arise, on-duty Employees and those off-duty Employees as may be designated by the officer in charge of the shift shall respond and carry out all duties assigned. 7.3 Officers, agents, representatives or members of the Association who are not Employees of the Fire Department shall have access to the premises of the City, at reasonable times, provided they notify the Fire Chief or the Chief's designee of their presence upon Page 5 of 21 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2019 arrival, and that their presence will not, in the opinion of the Chief or the Chief's designee, disrupt the orderly routine of the Department. ARTICLE 8 EMPLOYEE RIGHTS-GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 8.1 DEFINITION OF A GRIEVANCE A grievance is defined as a dispute or disagreement as to the interpretation or application of the specific terms and conditions of this Agreement. 8.2 ASSOCIATION REPRESENTATIVES' The Employer will recognize Representatives designated by the Association as the grievance representatives of the bargaining unit having the duties and responsibilities established by this Article. The Association shall notify the Employer in writing of the names of such Association Representatives and of their successors when so designated. 8.3 PROCESSING OF A GRIEVANCE It is recognized and accepted by the Association and the Employer that the processing of grievances as hereinafter provided is limited by the job duties and responsibilities of the Employee and shall therefore be accomplished during normal working hours only when consistent with such Employee duties and responsibilities. The aggrieved Employee and Association Representative shall be allowed a reasonable amount of time without loss in pay when a grievance is investigated and presented to the Employer during normal working hours provided that the Employee and the Association Representative have notified and received approval of the designated supervisor who has determined that such absence is reasonable and would not be detrimental to the work programs of the Employer. 8.4 PROCEDURE Grievances, as defined by section 8.1, shall be resolved in conformance with the following procedure: Step I. An Employee claiming a violation concerning the interpretation or application of this AGREEMENT shall, within twenty-one (21) calendar days after such alleged violation has occurred, present such grievance to the Employer-designated representative on the shift during which time the alleged violation occurred. The Employer-designated representative will discuss and give an answer to such Step I grievance within ten (10) calendar days after receipt. A grievance not resolved in Step I and appealed to Step 2 shall be placed in writing setting forth the nature of the grievance, the facts on which it is based, the provision or provisions of the AGREEMENT allegedly violated, the remedy requested, and shall be appealed to Step 2 within ten (10) calendar days after the Employer-designated representative's final answer in Step I. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 2 by the Association within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. Page 6 of 21 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2019 Step 2. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the Association and discussed with the Employer-designated representative. The Employer-designated representative shall give the Association the Employer's Step 2 answer in writing within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of such Step 2 grievance. A grievance not resolved in Step 2 may be appealed to Step 3 within ten (10) calendar days following the Employer's final Step 2 answer. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 3 by the Association within ten (I0) calendar days shall be considered waived. Step 3. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the Association and discussed with the City Manager. The City Manager shall give the Association the Employer's answer in writing within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of such Step 3 grievance. A grievance not resolved in Step 3 may be appealed to Step 4 within ten (10) calendar days following the City Manager's final answer in Step 3. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 4 by the Association within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. Step 4. A grievance unresolved in Step 3 and appealed to Step 4 shall be submitted to arbitration subject to the provisions of the Public Employment Labor Relations Act of 1971. The selection of an arbitrator shall be made in the following manner: Either the Employer or the Association shall request the Bureau of Mediation Services to submit a list of five (5) arbitrators. The Employer and the Association shall alternately strike names from the list until one name remains who shall be the arbitrator. The party entitled to strike the first name shall be determined by the toss of a fair coin. 8.5 A. The arbitrator shall have no right to amend, modify, nullify, ignore, add to, or subtract from the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The arbitrator shall consider and decide only the specific issue(s) submitted in writing by the Employer and the Association and shall have no authority to make a decision on any other issue not so submitted. B. The arbitrator shall be without power to make decisions contrary to, or inconsistent with, or modifying or varying in any way the application of laws, rules, or regulations having the force and effect of law. The arbitrator's decision shall be submitted in writing within thirty (30) days following the close of the hearing or the submission of ,briefs by the parties, whichever be later, unless the parties agree to an extension. The decision shall be binding on both the Employer and the Association and shall be based solely on the arbitrator's interpretation or application of the expressed terms of this Agreement and to the facts of the grievance presented. C. The fees and the expenses for the arbitrator's services and proceedings shall be borne equally by the Employer and the Association provided that each party shall be responsible for compensating its own representatives and witnesses. If either party desires a verbatim record of the proceedings, it may cause such a record to be made, providing it pays for the record. If both parties desire verbatim Page 7 of 21 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2019 record of the proceedings, the cost shall be shared equally. 8.6 WAIVER If a grievance is not presented within the time limits set forth above, it shall be considered waived. If a grievance is not appealed to the next step within the specified time limit or any agreed extension thereof, it shall be considered settled on the basis of the Employer's last answer. If the Employer does not answer a grievance or an appeal thereof within the specified time limits, the Association may elect to treat the grievance as denied at that step and immediately appeal the grievance to the next step. The time limit in each step may be extended by mutual written agreement of the Employer and the Association in each step. 8.7 CHOICE OF REMEDY If, as a result of the written Employer response in Step 3 the grievance remains unresolved, and if the grievance involves the suspension, demotion, or discharge of an Employee who has completed the required probationary period, the grievance may be appealed either to Step 4 of Article VIII or a procedure such as Veteran's Preference or Fair Employment. If appealed to any procedure other than Step 4 of Article VIII the grievance is not subject to the arbitration procedure as provided in Step 4 of Article VIII. The aggrieved Employee shall indicate, in writing, which procedure is to be utilized -Step 4 of Article VIII or another appeal procedure - and shall sign a statement of the effect that the choice of any other hearing precludes the aggrieved Employee from making a subsequent appeal through step 4 of Article VIII. ARTICLE 9 SAVINGS CLAUSE The Agreement is subject to law. In the event any provision of this Agreement shall be held to be contrary to law by a court of competent jurisdiction from whose final judgment or decree no appeal has been taken within the time provided, such provision shall be voided. All other provisions shall continue in full force and effect. The voided provision may be renegotiated at the written request of either party. ARTICLE 10 SENIORITY 10.1 Seniority shall be determined by the Employee's length of continuous employment with the Fire Department and posted in an appropriate location. Seniority rosters shall be maintained by the Employer on the basis of time in grade and time within specific classifications. 10.2 A reduction of the work force will be accomplished on the basis of seniority. No full-time firefighter (i.e. member of the Association) shall be laid off while any volunteer/paid on call firefighter remains on the roster except under Article XV of this Agreement. 10.3 Employees shall be recalled from lay off on the basis of seniority. An Employee on lay off shall have an opportunity to return to work within two years of the time of the lay off before any new Employee is hired. Recall notification shall be by registered mail with Page 8 of 21 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2019 Employee having two (2) weeks to return to work to retain seniority rights. 10.4 Vacation periods shall be selected on the basis of seniority until December 1st of each year. 10.5 Senior qualified shift Employees shall be given shift preference after eighteen (18) months of continuous full-time employment with the department. Shift preference shall start by October I st and be completed no later than October I 5th of each year. ARTICLE 11 WORK SCHEDULES The sole authority in establishing work schedules is the Employer. The Employer agrees to give the Affected Employee fifteen (15) calendar days' notice of non-emergency changes in the work schedule which affects one (I) or more Employees of the department. The Employer reserves the right to make emergency changes in the work schedule as may be necessary without prior notice to the Affected Employee. The fifteen (15) day notice requirement does not apply to Employees moved to light-duty or offered a work accommodation. 11.2 An emergency change is defined as an increased service demand as a result of unforeseen events, such as pandemic, natural or man-made disaster, or task force deployment. 11.3 In the even an employee is attending a department required or sanctioned training even (SWAT, SOT, MN-TF I, FFI, FFII, and the like), the hours that employee is away from shift duty will not be counted towards shift minimums. Time off relating to this article must be submitted at least fifteen (15) calendar days prior to the requested date. ARTICLE 12 OVERTIME PAY 12.1 Hours worked in excess of what is the normal work day (except for shift changes), as established by the Employer in the Employee's work schedule, shall be considered overtime and shall be compensated for at the overtime rate as defined in Article III. 12.2 Payments shall be made to the nearest quarter hour. 12.3 Overtime shall be restricted to necessary work authorized by the Employee's authorized supervisor. 12.4 Employees have the obligation to work overtime if requested by the Employer unless unusual circumstances prevent the Employee from so working. Page 9 of 21 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2019 ARTICLE 13 CALL-BACK TIME 13.1 An Employee who is called to duty during his scheduled off-duty time shall receive a minimum of two (2) hours pay at his overtime rate defined in Article III. 13.2 If an Employee is called to duty between the hours of 2200 to 0800, they shall receive a minimum of three (3) hours pay at his overtime rate as defined in ARTICLE Ill. 13.3 Payments for time beyond the minimum designated 13.1 and 13.2 shall be to the nearest quarter hour. 13.4 Employees have the obligation to answer call-backs if requested by the Employer unless unusual circumstances prevent the Employee from so answering. 13.5 No Employee receiving overtime pay under this Article shall be paid more than once for the same hours worked. No compounding of overtime pay will be allowed under this Article. 13.6 If an employee is held past their scheduled end time for purposes of maintaining minimum staff levels at station two, when the Fire Department was given a minimum of one (I) hour of notice of the short staffing situation, the shift supervisor must notify the replacement within 45 minutes of the start of the shift or the held-over employee shall receive a minimum of one hour of pay at their overtime rate as defined in Article 3. ARTICLE 14 SHIFT EXCHANGE 14.1 Employees may exchange duty shifts with another Employee provided that such exchange does not subject the Employer to liability for additional overtime compensation by virtue of such trading of duty shifts. 14.2 Employees may exchange shifts only with the specific approval of the Employer and under the conditions established by the Employer. 14.3 All shift exchanges that are made and approved must be made up within twelve (12) months from the date on which the exchange is made. ARTICLE 15 DISCIPLINE I 5.1 Nothing in the Agreement shall abridge the Employer's right to discipline for just cause, such discipline being subject to the grievance procedure. 15.2 Discipline will be in one or more of the following forms: a) oral reprimand d) demotion b) written reprimand e) discharge c) suspension Page 10 of 21 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2019 ARTICLE 16 PROBATIONARY PERIOD 16.1 All newly hired Employees will serve a one (I) year probationary period. At any time during the probationary period, a newly hired Employee may be terminated at the sole discretion of the Employer. 16.2 The probationary period shall also apply to all promotions and reclassifications within the Fire Department. If, during the promotional probationary period, the Employee does not meet the Employer's standards of performance, the Employee shall be demoted to his previous classification at the sole discretion of the Employer. ARTICLE 17 SICK LEAVE WITH PAY 17.1 Employees working a forty (40) hour work week shall accrue sick leave, with pay, at the rate of 3.69 hours per bi-weekly pay period with a maximum accumulation of 960 hours. Other Employees shall accrue sick leave, with pay, at the rate of 7.38 hours per bi-weekly pay period with a maximum accumulation of 2,880 hours. 17.2 Paid sick leave may be used as defined in the City's Personnel Policies/Employee Handbook. 17.3 See Appendix A-2 for payment of unused sick leave. ARTICLE 18 WORKING OUT OF CLASSIFICATION Any Employee required by the Employer to perform the duties and assume the authority of a higher position or rank shall receive compensation in accordance with this article and Appendix A-I. Assignment to a higher position or rank is at the sole discretion of a chief officer. 18.1 Any Employee required by the Employer to perform the duties and assume the responsibility of Inspector or shift officer for less than four (4) hours per shift shall not receive any additional compensation. Employees required by the Employer to perform the duties and accept the authority of Inspector, or shift officer for more than four (4) hours per shift shall receive compensation as provided for in Appendix A-I. Employees so assigned for more than four (4) hours per shift will be paid retroactively for the primary four hours. 18.2 Any Employee required by the Employer to perform the duties and assume the responsibility of a field training officer (FTO) shall receive compensation as provided for in Appendix A-I while performing the duties of a field training officer. Page 11 of 21 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2019 ARTICLE 19 VACATION 19.1 Employees shall accrue vacation with pay in accordance with the following schedule: 5 years or less Commencing with the 6th year thru the le year of service Commencing with the Ilth year thru the 15th year of service Commencing with the 16th year of service Commencing with the 21st year of service Employees Scheduled For 40 Hours Per Week 3.08 hours/pay period 4.92 hours/pay period 5.54 hours/pay period 6.46 hours/pay period 6.76 hours/pay period Employees Working Other Schedules 5.08 hours/pay period 7.85 hours/pay period 8.77 hours/pay period 10.15 hours/pay period 11.08 hours/pay period 19.2 Employees will be able to accrue a maximum of 480 hours of vacation leave for 40 hour per week employees, and 672 hours of vacation leave for employees working other schedules. Once the maximum level of vacation is reached, additional leave will not be accrued until the balance falls below the maximum accrual level. Unused vacation leave up to the maximum balance of 480/672 hours will be paid to employees who leave in good standing upon termination of employment. The first year of employment, new employees will be allowed to carry a balance of vacation to a maximum of -80 hours. 19.3 Excess Vacation Accrual Account (EVAA) Some employees hired prior to January 2013 have an EVAA that was set up to assist in the transition to the current accrual limits. Balances in EVAA accounts are reflected on employee pay stubs and can be used in the following ways: q Vacation or sick leave in one hour increments. q In November of each year, employees will have the option of cashing out up to 40 hours (x1.4 for employees working other shifts) of vacation leave (EVAA) at their current base rate of pay. The City Manager may allow a higher number for all employees, based on City finances. tit Any remaining balance at termination will be cashed out at the current base rate of pay for employees who leave in good standing. 19.4 Vacation Cash Out. In addition to EVAA, vacation earned during the calendar year but not used may be cashed out at the Employee's request on a pro-rata basis at the Employee's base pay rate. Not more than twelve (12) days per calendar year shall be cashed out for Employees scheduled for 40 hours per week and not more than seven Page 12 of 21 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2019 (7) days per calendar year shall be cashed out for Employees working other shifts. Such cash out shall occur within in November of each year. ARTICLE 20 HOLIDAYS 20.1 The Employer recognizes the following as paid holidays: New Year's Day Martin L. King Day Presidents Day Memorial Day Independence Day Labor Day Veteran's Day Thanksgiving Day Post-Thanksgiving Day Christmas Eve Christmas Day January I Third Monday in January Third Monday in February Last Monday in May July 4th. First Monday in September November 11 Fourth Thursday in November Friday immediately after Thanksgiving Day December 24 December 25 Floating Holiday* *Refer to Floating Holiday Guidelines in Employee Handbook To receive paid holiday leave, an employee must be at work or on paid leave the scheduled days or shifts immediately preceding and following the City Holiday. When New Year's Day, Independence Day, Veteran's Day, or Christmas Day fall on Saturday, the preceding Friday is the paid holiday, and should these days fall on Sunday, the following Monday shall be the paid holiday. If Christmas Eve falls on a Friday, Saturday, or Sunday, Regular Full-Time and Regular Part-Time employees will receive an additional 8-hour floating holiday in lieu of the Christmas Eve holiday that year. 20.2 Employees working an eight (8) hour day shall receive the holidays in 20.1 with pay, provided, however, that Employees may be scheduled to work on paid holidays when the nature of their duties or other conditions so require. Employees scheduled to work on paid holidays shall receive an additional one and one half (I-1/2) times their regular rate of pay for the number of hours actually worked on the given holiday. 20.3 Employees working other than an eight (8) hour day shall receive neither pay nor time off for those holidays listed in 20.1. However, each member shall be given six (6) floating holidays which they may schedule utilization of in the same manner as vacation. There shall be no carryover of unused accrual from year to year. Floating holidays earned during the calendar year but not used may be cashed out at the Employee's request up to a maximum of the six (6) days granted per year. The cash out, if chosen, of these days shall be done twice during the year. After June I an Employee can cash out a maximum of three (3) floating holidays. In November, an Employee can cash out the remaining floating holidays. Floating holidays: Employees who are not actively employed with the City twelve (12) months in any calendar year (new hires, leaving employment with less than twelve (12) months in the calendar year, leave of absence) shall be granted their floating holidays in accordance with pro-rated ratio of one day for every 2.0 months of service, or portion thereof. Page 13 of 21 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2019 20.4 The Employer, in its discretion, may grant a holiday to individual Employees for the celebration of certain religious Holy Days observed by their particular faith. 20.5 Those Employees assigned to shifts who are not scheduled or assigned to work on the following days but are called back shall receive an additional half (1/2) time pay over the one and a half (I 1/2) times for overtime for those hours actually worked on the following days: January I Third Monday in January Third Monday in February Friday immediately preceding Easter Easter Sunday Last Monday in May July 4 First Monday in September November 11 Fourth Thursday in November Friday immediately after the fourth Thursday in November December 24 after 1200 December 25 December 31 after 1200 For the purpose of this 20.5, the holiday is from 0001 to 2400 of the day of the holiday. 20.6 Those individuals who are scheduled to work between midnight and midnight on January I, Memorial Day, July 4, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, and December 25 shall receive an additional one-half time pay for those hours actually worked. ARTICLE 21 UNIFORMS Uniform items will be provided and replaced as determined by the Employer. A list of those uniform items that are authorized for use shall be kept by the staff officer designated by the Fire Chief to be responsible for uniform items. Authorization for new or replacement uniform items rests exclusively with the Employer. ARTICLE 22 FITNESS INCENTIVE Employees eligible for the fitness incentive shall receive not more than $680 per year to be applied to the cost of dues or fees for membership or use of a qualifying fitness facility or program. In no event shall the amount of the incentive paid exceed the actual cost of the dues, fees or program costs. Eligible Employees shall receive the fitness incentive in not more than two payments to be issued within three weeks after submission, with appropriate documentation, to the Employer. Page 14 of 21 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2019 ARTICLE 23 INSURANCE 23.1 The Employer will provide the same increase in EMPLOYER contribution as is given to all other City employees. Each year after the contribution is determined; the City will provide a Memo of Understanding to the Union stating the contribution amount. 23.2 The Employer agrees to provide a $70,000.00 accidental death and dismemberment insurance policy, the cost of which is to be shared in the following manner: Employee shall pay $10.00 per year. The Employer shall pay the remaining cost of the premium. ARTICLE 24 WAIVER 24.1 Any and all prior Agreements, resolutions, practices, policies, rules, and any regulations regarding terms and conditions of employment, to the extent inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement, are hereby superseded. 24.2 The parties mutually acknowledge that during the negotiations which resulted in this Agreement, each had the unlimited right and opportunity to make demands and proposals with respect to any term or condition of employment not removed by law from bargaining. All Agreements and understandings arrived at by the parties are set forth in writing in this Agreement for the stipulated duration of this Agreement. The Employer and the Association each voluntarily and unqualifiedly waives the right to meet and negotiate regarding any and all terms and conditions of employment referred to or covered in this Agreement or with respect to any term or condition of employment not specifically referred to or covered by this Agreement, even though such terms or conditions may not have been within the knowledge or contemplation of either or both of the parties at the time this contract was negotiated or executed. ARTICLE 25 LONGEVITY AND EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE 25.1 Eligible Employees shall receive bi-weekly longevity payment, calculated based on the employee's current step (Job Classification and Year) in Appendix A- I according to the following schedule: From the end of the 5th year to the end of the 9th year 4% From the end of the 9th year to the end of the 13th year 5% From the end of the 13th year to the end of the 17th year 6% From the end of the 17th year on 7% 25.2 All Employees shall be eligible for participation in the City's Tuition Reimbursement program as defined in the Employee Development section of the City of Edina Employee Handbook. 25.3 An Employee will receive an additional payment as identified in Appendix A-1, upon successful completion of a fire services technology AAS Degree or a bachelor's degree Page 15 of 21 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2019 from an institution or equivalent program approved by the Fire Chief. ARTICLE 26 PARAMEDIC CERTIFICATION INCENTIVE Any Employee who is permanently assigned to a position other than firefighter/paramedic shall receive paramedic certification pay in accordance with Appendix A provided that the Employee maintains in full force and effect the same paramedic certification required by the Employer for Employees assigned as firefighters/paramedics. ARTICLE 27 SPECIALTY CERTIFICATION INCENTIVE Any Employee who is assigned to function as a Special Operations Technician with the City of Edina SOT and MNTF I shall receive specialty certification pay in accordance with Appendix A, provided that the Employee maintains in full force and effect the same specialty certification required for appointment and maintains a rostered position on the team. ARTICLE 28 INJURY IN LINE OF DUTY 28.1 Employees injured while on duty shall be paid the difference between the Employee's regular rate of pay and any Workers' Compensation benefits for a period not to exceed ninety (90) calendar days. The Employee shall endorse their Workers' Compensation check to the City which shall reimburse the Employee at full regular pay. Such time shall not be charged against the Employee's sick or vacation leave. 28.2 Such injury-on-duty pay shall be granted only to Employees certified by the Workers' Compensation carrier as being incapacitated as a result of injury incurred through no misconduct of their own while on the actual performance of City assigned duties and only during the period they remain so certified. 28.3 The City Manager shall have the discretion to require an injured Employee to submit to a medical examination by competent medical authority approved by the City to determine if the Employee is capable and qualified to return to any assigned City duties commensurate with their capabilities. 28.4 To qualify for such compensation an Employee shall comply with all requirements of the Minnesota Workers' Compensation Act. Page 16 of 21 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2019 ARTICLE 29 FUNERAL LEAVE Paid leave (sick, vacation, etc) may be used for funeral leave as defined in the City's personnel policies/Employee Handbook. ARTICLE 30 SEVERANCE PAY 30.1 Regular full-time employees who have sick leave benefits and leave the City in good standing (as described in the Resignation and Retirement section of the Employee Handbook: General Employment Policies) after a minimum of five (5) years of full-time employment — or — who were employed by the City prior to January I, 2016 and leave in good standing, shall receive a lump sum payment equal to 50% of their accrued and unused sick leave as of the date of separation. The maximum number of hours subject to this payment shall not exceed 960 hours, (i.e., 1,920 hours of accrued and unused sick leave x 50% = 960 hours). Payment for employees working other than 40 hour schedules shall not exceed 1,440 hours (2,880 hours of accrued and unused sick leave x 50%). Sick leave will be cashed out at the employee's base rate of pay at time of separation. The payment shall be made within 30 days of separation. 30.2 Grandfathered Severance Program. Employees hired prior to May I, 201 I had the option to opt-out of the severance program described above and remain in the Grandfathered Severance Program. Those employees who opted out have paperwork on file with Human Resources. Those employees who chose to opt-out follow this program instead of the above program: Employees who leave employment in good standing with the City, upon completion of at least 15 years continuous employment with the City, or who become totally and permanently disabled as determined by PERA under PERA rules, or who are permanently laid off shall receive a maximum of 6 weeks' pay to be issued upon such termination. A person may only receive such payment once from the City. 30.3 In order to resign in good standing, an employee must provide their supervisor and Human Resources with a written resignation stating the last date of work and reason for leaving at least 14 calendar days prior to the resignation date. The City may accept lesser notice if, in the City's determination, the 14 calendar day notice cannot be reasonably given. In order to leave in in good standing an employee must also return all City property and cooperate with requests for work-related information. ARTICLE 31 PROMOTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES Promotions shall be based on job relevant qualifications. Seniority shall be the determining criterion for promotions when the job relevant qualifications between qualified Employees are equal. Page 17 of 21 For the CITY OF EDINA: Kelly Curtin, /FIR Director Ivor Scott Neal, City Manage( For the INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL NO. 127 Sco Ice President Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2019 ARTICLE 32 CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE AND ALCOHOL TESTING Members of the bargaining unit will be covered by the City's Controlled Substance and Alcohol Testing (non-DOT) Policy. ARTICLE 33 DURATION This Agreement shall be effective as of the first day of January 2019 and shall remain in full force and effect until the 31st day of December 2020. It shall be automatically renewed from year to year thereafter unless either party shall notify the other in writing of its intent to terminate. ARTICLE 34 LICENSURE The City will pay the license fee for all employees covered by this contract. In witness whereof, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on December 2Ist, 2018. David Ehmiller, Treasurer Page 18 of 21 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2019 APPENDIX A-1 SALARY SCHEDULE 2019 2020 2,080 Hourly 2,904 Hourly 2,904 Hours (Annual) 2,080 Hourly 2,904 Hourly 2,904 Hours (Annual) Firefighter Year 1 $21.64 $15.50 $45,021 $22.29 $15.97 $46,372 Year 2 $26.55 $19.01 $55,218 $27.34 $19.59 $56,875 Year 3 $31.09 $22.27 $64,666 $32.02 $22.94 $66,606 Year 4 $32.49 $23.27 $67,579 $33.46 $23.97 $69,607 Year 5 $35.32 $25.29 $73,457 $36.38 $26.05 $75,660 Year 6 $35.49 $25.42 $73,823 $36.56 $26.18 $76,038 Year 7 $35.67 $25.55 $74,193 $36.74 $26.31 $76,419 Firefighter/Lieutenant Year I $34.44 $24.67 $71,642 $35.48 $25.41 $73,791 Year 2 $37.10 $26.57 $77,167 $38.21 $27.37 $79,482 Year 3 $38.02 $27.23 $79,086 $39.16 $28.05 $81,459 Year 4 $40.85 $29.26 $84,972 $42.08 $30.14 $87,521 Year 5 $42.23 $30.24 $87,83 I $43.49 $31.15 $90,466 Year 6 $42.42 $30.39 $88,240 $43.70 $31.30 $90,887 Year 7 $42.86 $30.70 $89,155 $44.15 $31.62 $91,829 Year 8 $43.29 $31.01 $90,046 $44.59 $31.94 $92,747 Firefighter/Inspector Year I $33.59 $24.06 $69,863 $34.60 $15.00 $71,959 Year 2 $36.34 $26.03 $75,591 $37.43 $26.81 $77,858 Year 3 $37.81 $27.08 $78,638 $38.94 $27.89 $80,998 Year 4 $40.02 $28.67 $83,244 $41.22 $29.53 $85,741 Year 5 $41.37 $29.63 $86,047 $42.61 $30.52 $88,629 Year 6 $41.58 $29.78 $86,477 $42.82 $30.67 $89,071 Year 7 $41.99 $30.08 $87,339 $43.25 $30.98 $89,959 Year 8 $42.41 $30.37 $88,208 $43.68 $31.29 $90,854 Firefighter/Paramedic Year I $32.01 $22.92 $66,573 $32.97 $23.61 $68,570 Year 2 $35.60 $25.50 $74,055 $36.67 $26.27 $76,277 Year 3 $37.07 $26.55 $77,102 $38.18 $27.35 $79,415 Year 4 $40.02 $28.67 $83,244 $41.22 $29.53 $85,741 Year 5 $41.37 $29.63 $86,047 $42.61 $30.52 $88,629 Year 6 $41.58 $29.78 $86,477 $42.82 $30.67 $89,071 Year 7 $41.99 $30.08 $87,339 $43.25 $30.98 $89,959 Year 8 $42.41 $30.37 $88,208 $43.68 $31.29 $90,854 Page 19 of 21 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2019 (Appendix A, cont.) Supplemental: Paramedic Certification Pay for Lieutenants and Inspectors is $1800.00 ($0.87 per hour for 40-hour per week employees and $0.62 per hour for other schedules). Supplemental: Education incentive under 25.3 for all Job Classifications is $1800.00 ($0.87 per hour for 40-hour per week employees and $0.69 per hour for other schedules). Supplemental: Specialty Certification Pay for assignment as a Special Operations Technician (SOT) is $500/year ($0.24 per hour for 40-hour per week employees and $0.17 per hour for other schedules) in addition to the Employee's hourly pay rate. 22"d/ 123rd Day: Employees who work a 122nd or 123rd shift will be paid for the hours worked on the extra shift during the last pay period of the year in which the respective shift is worked. Working Out of Classification: â Acting Shift Officer - $3.50 per hour in addition to the employee's hourly pay rate. â FTO - $3.50 per hour in addition to the employee's hourly pay rate. Advanced Resignation Notice: The City will provide the following one-time payment for advance notice: • Ninety (90) Days' Notice: $1,000 • One Hundred and Twenty Days' Notice: $1,500 Payment will be made on or after the employment termination date. Payment is subject to taxation and required deductions. Page 20 of 21 Master Labor Agreement: City of Edina and IAFF Local No. 1275 January 1, 2019 APPENDIX A-2 POLICY FOR A HEALTH CARE SAVINGS PLAN Statement of Purpose The Health Care Savings Plan (HCSP) is a program that allows City of Edina regular full-time employees to set aside their severance benefit into an account to pay medical expenses and/or health insurance premiums after they are no longer employed by the City. Employees can choose between investment options provided by the plan administrator. Assets in the account accumulate tax-free and, since payouts are used for qualified medical expenses, they remain tax- free. This Policy amends the Policy for payment of unused sick leave adopted September 7, 1999. Eligibility Effective April I, 2003, this program applies to all regular full time non-union employees. Employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement are not eligible unless this policy is included as a provision in their collective bargaining agreement. The City of Edina and IAFF 1.275 agree that members of the Firefighter Bargaining Unit will participate in the City's Healthcare Savings Plan outlined as follows: Program Severance payments upon termination of employment will be used to fund the HCSP. • Employees with less than five years of service do not participate in the HCSP. • For all employees with more than five years of service participation in the HCSP is mandatory. • Employees eligible to receive a payment for unused sick leave at termination of employment must contribute the entire sick leave portion of their severance to the HCSP account up to a maximum of 960 hours. • Employees eligible to receive six weeks' severance pay at termination instead of payment for sick leave must contribute the entire six weeks' severance payment to their HCSP account. Plan Administration Information The HCSP is administered by Minnesota State Retirement System (MSRS). Information regarding MSRS and the administration of the plan is available at: http://www.msrs.state.mn.us/hcsp/indes.htmls\ Page 21 of 21 Date: May 18, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.K. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve New On-Sale Wine and 3.2 On-Sale Beer Liquor License for Peoples Organic Coffee Bakery Cafes, Inc.dba Peoples Organic Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve new On-Sale Wine and 3.2 On-Sale Beer Liquor License for Peoples Organic Coffee Bakery Cafes, Inc. dba P eoples Organic for period beginning May 18, 2021 through March 31, 2022. INTRODUCTION: Peoples Organic recently moved from 3945 Galleria to 2750 Southdale Center. Because liquor licenses are not transferrable, they had to apply for a new license. The Administration and Planning Departments reviewed the application and find that they comply with code requirements. The Health Department is satisfied with the applicant’s plan for storage and service. A background investigation was completed by the Police Department and Lt. Conboy’s findings are attached. Staff recommends approval of the liquor license. ATTACHMENTS: Description Police Background Investigation Report Establishment: License: BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION SUMMARY ON-SALE WINE AND 3.2 LIQUOR LICENSE Peoples Organic Coffee Bakery Cafes, Inc. DBA: Peoples Organic On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Liquor In April 2021, the Edina Police Department began a background investigation relating to a City of Edina application for an On-Sale Wine and 3 .2 Liquor License. The application was submitted by Peoples Organic Coffee Bakery Cafes, Inc, DBA: Peoples Organic. Peoples Organic Coffee Bakery Cafes, Inc. DBA: Peoples Organic will operate from 2750 Southdale Center., Edina. Peoples Organic Coffee Bakery Cafes, Inc. DBA: Peoples Organic is authorized to do business in Minnesota and is registered with the State of Minnesota. Peoples Organic Coffee Bakery Cafes, Inc. DBA: Peoples Organic is currently active and in good standing with the Minnesota Secretary of State. Peoples Organic Coffee Bakery Cafes, Inc. DBA: Peoples Organic and/or its representatives are aware of the City of Edina's requirement relating to employee alcohol awareness training. The training was completed on February 17°1, 2021.Owners/Partners/Members: Roberts, Raymond Robe1is, Juell Powell, David Peoples Organic Coffee Bakery Cafes, Inc. DBA: Peoples Organic: St. Paul St. Paul United Kingdom The owners/partners/members have been investigated. No criminal records which would negatively affect their license application were found. Checks were made with the following agencies: NCIC MINCIS Hennepin County Minnesota Secretary of State Minnesota Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division From the information gathered during the course of the investigation, I found nothing to prevent, Peoples Organic Coffee Bakery Cafes, Inc. DBA: Peoples Organic from obtaining an On-Sale Wine and 3 .2 Liquor license. I would support a positive recommendation from the Police Department in regard to the issuance of this license. Date: May 18, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.L. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-42: Accepting Donations Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2021-42 accepting donations. INTRODUCTION: To comply with State Statute, all donations to the City must be accepted by resolution and approved by two- thirds majority of the Council. See attached resolution with list of donations. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-42: Accepting Donations RESOLUTION NO. 2021-42 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Art Center • Andy & Michaele Herring $500 General Operating Support Parks & Recreation • Pacy Erck $1,000 Memorial/Honor Garden • Zoi & Yevgeniy Sychev $3,500 10 trees at Pamela Park Dated: May 18, 2021 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 18, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _______ day of ___________________, 2021. City Clerk Date: May 18, 2021 Agenda Item #: VII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Scott H. Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar Update Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Fifth District U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar will share an update and answer questions. Date: May 18, 2021 Agenda Item #: VII.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Pete Fisher, Interim Fire Chief Item Activity: Subject:Proclamation: Emergency Medical Services Week Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt proclamation declaring May 16-22, 2021, Emergency Medical Services Week. INTRODUCTION: In honor of those that deliver emergency medical services to the citizens and those that work, travel or visit Edina and require emergency medical services. ATTACHMENTS: Description Proclamation EMS Week 2021 PROCLAMATION EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES WEEK May 16 – 22, 2021 WHEREAS, emergency medical services are a vital public service; and WHEREAS, the members of emergency medical services teams are ready to provide lifesaving care to those in need 24 hours a day, seven days a week; and WHEREAS, access to quality emergency care dramatically improves the survival and recovery rate of those who experience sudden illness or injury; and WHEREAS, emergency medical services have grown to fill a gap by providing important, out of hospital care, including preventative medicine, follow-up care, and access to telemedicine; and WHEREAS, the emergency medical services system consists of first responders, emergency medical technicians, paramedics, emergency medical dispatchers, firefighters, police officers, educators, administrators, pre-hospital nurses, emergency nurses, emergency physicians, trained members of the public, and other out of hospital medical care providers; and WHEREAS, the members of emergency medical services teams, whether career or volunteer, engage in thousands of hours of specialized training and continuing education to enhance their lifesaving skills; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate to recognize the value and the accomplishments of emergency medical services providers by designating Emergency Medical Services Week; now NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Edina, MN, hereby proclaim the week of May 16-22, 2021, as Emergency Medical Services Week In the City of Edina, MN, with the theme, EMS Strong: Beyond the Call, I encourage the community to observe this week with appropriate programs, ceremonies and activities. Dated this 18th day of May 2021. _________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Date: May 18, 2021 Agenda Item #: VII.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner Item Activity: Subject:Proclamation: Preservation Month Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt proclamation declaring May 2021 Preservation Month. INTRODUCTION: The City joins other local and state preservation groups and organizations in celebrating May as Preservation Month. Preservation month is designed to raise awareness of historic properties, and to celebrate history, culture, and historic places. The Heritage Preservation Commission had a walking tour planned during their May meeting but due to COVID-19 the in person tour was cancelled. The HPC worked with city staff to create a virtual walking tour. ATTACHMENTS: Description Proclamation: Preservation Month May 2021 PROCLAMATION PRESERVATION MONTH MAY 2021 WHEREAS, historic preservation is an effective tool for managing growth and sustainable development, revitalizing neighborhoods, fostering local pride and maintaining community character while enhancing livability; and WHEREAS, historic preservation is relevant for communities across the nation, both urban and rural, and for Americans of all ages, all walks of life, and all ethnic backgrounds; and WHEREAS, it is important to celebrate the role of history in our lives and the contributions made by dedicated individuals in helping to preserve the tangible aspects of the heritage that has shaped us as a people; and WHEREAS, Preservation Month 2021 is sponsored by the Edina Heritage Preservation Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Edina, hereby proclaim May 2021, as Preservation Month In the City of Edina, MN, and call upon the people of Edina to join their fellow citizens in recognizing and participating in this special observance. Dated this 18th day of May 2021. ____________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Date: May 18, 2021 Agenda Item #: VII.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner Item Activity: Subject:2021 Heritage Preservation Award Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None; information only. INTRODUCTION: The Heritage Preservation Commission has awarded the 2021 Heritage Preservation Award to 5900 Olinger Boulevard. The nomination states the mid-century modern home was built by the Lundgren Company in 1966. The architecture and details of this home follow classic California Modern designs refined by Joseph Eichler and others. The previous owners restored interior elements including exposed post and beam construction, board ceilings, and slab flooring. In 2019, the present owners restored and refined the home's courtyard, a distinguishing feature of Mid-Century-Modern homes. The plantings, while primarily native to Minnesota, emphasize a Japanese inspired design with dense plantings offering a variety of shapes, textures and colors over four seasons. The plants create a natural setting complemented by blue stone paving. The courtyard connects the interior of this Mid-Century- Modern with the outdoors. ATTACHMENTS: Description 5900 Olinger Boulevard-Award Nomination From:noreply@civicplus.com To:Emily Bodeker Subject:Online Form Submittal: Heritage Award Nomination Date:Wednesday, March 31, 2021 10:32:36 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Heritage Award Nomination About the Award The Heritage Award is given to a person, business or neighborhood for a commitment to preserving, rehabilitating or restoring a historical place in Edina. Each year the Heritage Preservation Commission selects a recipient who has strengthened the historic fabric of the community through protection, improvement or use of a place within Edina that represents a piece of the community's heritage. Learn More Award Details and Previous Winners How To Nominate Fill out and submit this online form. Or mail your nomination to the Edina Heritage Award, Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th St., Edina MN 55424. Nomination Deadline 4:30 p.m. April 5, 2021 Submitter First Name Robert Submitter Last Name Thompson Preferred Phone Number Preferred Email Break) Name of Property SuckowZiemer Residence Owner(s) of Property Holly Ziemer, Steven Suckow Email Address Address of Property 5900 Olinger Boulevard Zip Code 55436 Reason: What was done to preserve This Mid-Century-Modern home was built by the Lundgren Company in 1966. The architecture and details of this home and/or restore thehistoric integrity of thenominated property? follow classic California Modern designs refined by Joseph Eichler and others. The previous owners restored interior elements including exposed post and beam construction, board ceilings, and slab flooring. In 2019, the present owners restored and refined the home's courtyard, a distinguishing feature of Mid-Century- Modern homes. The plantings, while primarily native to Minnesota, emphasize a Japanese inspired design with dense plantings offering a variety of shapes, textures and colors over four seasons. The plants create a natural setting complemented by blue stone paving. The courtyard connects the interior of this Mid-Century-Modern with the outdoors. Upload an image of the project or property Courtyard_Garden3_2019_09_19-1024x791.jpg Additional image upload FrontEntrance_DoorsClosed_2019_09_20-1024x683.jpg Additional image upload IMG_1807.jpg Professionals (if any) involved in the project. Please provide contact information for anyrealtors, architects,builders, designers or other professionals. GroundOne, a Minnesota landscape design firm, designed and carried out the restoration of the courtyard. GroundOne specializes in custom residential landscape design and construction in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. GroundOne received the Minnesota Nursery and Landscape Association 2021 award for Excellence in Landscaping & Planting Design, and the NARI CotY New Comer landscape award for Minnesota in 2019. This Mid-Century-Modern renovation was featured in the Spring 2021 Minneapolis St. Paul Home & Design magazine. Public Data Advisory I have read and understand the public data advisory Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. Date: May 18, 2021 Agenda Item #: VII.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Heidi Lee, Race & Equity Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:2020 Race and Equity Summary Report Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: No action, information only. INTRODUCTION: The Race and Equity Work Plan was approved for implementation by City Council in 2018. The attached report provides information and updates on the race and equity work completed in 2020. ATTACHMENTS: Description 2020 Race and Equity Summary Report May 2021 Race & Equity Report Update May 18, 2021 Mayor and City Council Heidi Lee, Race and Equity Coordinator 2020 Race and Equity Summary Report Information / Background: Background Information: In September 2018, the City Council approved the Race and Equity Work Plan, which focused on 59 work plan items designated within the City’s departments to be completed. The Race and Equity Work Plan is categorized into five different areas of focus where race and equity should be implemented. Those five themes are: • Accountability and Data Collection • City Facilities & Services • Employee Training & Diversity • Development & Enforcement of Policies • Community Engagement & Communications By the end of 2020, the City would have engaged in 52 of the 59 items, such as having completed the items, researching, or started the work. The remaining 6 items are slated to be completed by the end of 2021 or have not been assigned a completion date. Figure 1 shows the results of the 2019 Race and Equity Work Plan Summary. The majority of the work plan items were targeted for completion in 2019. About 91% of the items were started or completed during that year. About 46% in 2019 were indicated as completed or completed and ongoing. For example, a work plan item “The racial equity advancement team (REAT) will work to identify specific opportunities to increase racial and cultural diversity on work teams” is listed as completed and ongoing. The formation of the Racial Equity Advancement Team has been formed and the team meets monthly and creates their race and equity work for one calendar year. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Figure 2 shows the current status of the work plan items at the end of 2020. While three new work plan items were added into 2020, staff continued to complete the race and equity work plan items from 2019. Figure 1. Race and Equity Plan at end 2019 Figure 2. Race and Equity Plan at end 2020 STAFF REPORT Page 3 At the end of 2020: • 37 items out of the 46 items have been completed, ending at an 80% completion rate within the five different themes. As the City continues to deepen their race and equity work, there have been different opportunities for staff and community members to engage in different ways. Some highlights of the past year’s work include: • Community Conversations about Race, Justice and Policing hosted by the Human Rights and Relations Commission. • The Stories We Share on Better Together Edina website, where community members and staff shared their experiences on race. • The City Council writing and approving an Equity Statement that shows their commitment to the race and equity work in the City. • City staff members engaging in race and equity by attending a racial equity training facilitated by the Racial Equity Advancement Team. Racial Equity Work Plan GOAL:TARGET STATUS PROGRESS Hire a full-time Race and Equity coordinator, whose accountabilities include oversight of the Racial Equity Implementation Plan (work plan), monitoring, assessing and evaluating progress toward goals.2019 - Q1 Complete Race and Equity Coordinator started on March 18, 2019. Racial Equity goals and metrics from the Racial Equity Implementation Plan will be incorporated into department work plans and employee performance reviews.2019 - Q1 Ongoing/ Continuation in 2020 Staff quarterly check-in have race and equity component embedded. City-wide race and equity goal has been established for 2021 for all departments. The racial equity advancement team (REAT) will work identify specific opportunities to increase racial and cultural diversity on work teams.2019 - Q2 Complete/ Ongoing REAT continues to meet virtually. The Engagement Group working on Just Deeds implementation plan. Work Plan Group providing work plan/project race and equity resource document. Training Group developing supplmental training for staff in 2021. Report results of the Quality of Life Survey disaggregated by race/ethnicity as part of the Annual Racial Equity Advancement Report.2019 - Q2 Not Complete Survey results presented in June 2019. Because the number of non-white survey respondents was small, race/ethnicity could not be disaggregated for all questions. 2021 Quality of Life Survey planning is underway. Evaluate feasibility and advisability of increasing the amount of police-community data collected by the City.2019 - Q2 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 PD has met with vendors to compare different records management system (RMS) capabilities and offerings that align with PD and data collection needs. No decision made on vendor yet. Provide Racial Equity Training to all City staff.2019 - Q2 Complete Leadership training on 12/2018 and IQS Racial Equity training for full-time city employees in 1/2019. City Council and Executive Leadership went through GROW Framework training in Q1-2020. GROW Training for all full-time staff started in February 2021. Evaluate quality of life survey questions to elicit relevant information about all city services around Race and Equity.2019 - Q3 Complete Quality of Life survey results have been provided in June 2019. Maintain a database on the number and location of affordable housing in Edina.2019 - Q4 Complete/ Ongoing Database of mult-housing units have been created and available on City of Edina's Afforable Housing page. Upon reviewing Police Department Policy Manual and removing non-public information, the manual will be placed on the City's website.2019 - Q4 Complete/ Continuation in 2020 All police department manual policies have been reviewed and posted on the City website, except policies that have tactical information. Investigate available data to desegregate maps of resident population by race and how this data can be linked to allocating funds through City budgeting processes (CIP, PACS, Operating)2019 - Q4 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 PACS Prioritization will be presented Transportation Commission feedback then presented to City Council for review. Establish a Racial Equity Advancement Annual Report and presentation for the Human Rights and Relations Commission and City Council. The annual report to the City Council will be presented at the second Council meeting in January starting in January of 2020. 2020 - Q1 Complete/ Ongoing 2019 Race and Equity status was provided to City Council on April 21, 2020. Quarterly updates are provided to City Council and Human Rights and Relations meeting. GOAL:TARGET STATUS PROGRESS Deliver staff training on scholarship fund availability to ensure residents are provided the opportunity to apply for financial assistance.2019 - Q1 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 Parks and Recreation is looking at program registration system and how scholarships information would work with system. Review the existing Come Home 2 Edina program and advertisement strategy to families of color.2019 - Q3 Complete Brochures have been translated into Spanish; however, more intentional is being focused on alternative ways to market to families of color such as creating relationships with organizations. Demographic information continues to be collected through application process. ACCOUNTABILITY & DATA COLLECTION CITY FACILITIES & SERVICES Updated 5.13.2021 Page 1 of 4 Racial Equity Work Plan GOAL:TARGET STATUS PROGRESS Ensure City facility artwork and décor reflects diversity of race and culture.2019 - Q4 Complete/ Continued into 2020 Arts & Décor Rurbic was approved by City Council on August 18, 2020. Commissions will use the rubric to model how it will be used for future assessment in City faciltiies when City Hall remodel is complete. Arts & Culture Commission is using the rubric in planning process for some projects. Review and identify if barriers to utilization of Park and Recreation programs exist and elicit solutions from community members and users.2019 - Q4 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 This work plan has been moved to 2021 work plan. City staff members will creates a plan to receive feedback from community members on barriers to program utilizations. PARC and HRRC will review and comment in 2021 Commission work plans. Name a public facility in the Grandview area after BC and Ellen Yancey. Human Rights and Relations Commission will review and comment. Parks and Recreation Commission will review and recommend.2019 - Q4 Complete/ Contined into 2020 On October 7, 2020 the Edina City Council unanimously renamed Garden Park as Yancey Park and directed staff to plan for the renaming. Staff is planning renaming event in 2021, discriminatory covenant on Yancey Park needs to be removed before event occurs. Ensure facilities have wayfinding signage and printed materials in multiple languages.2019 - Q4 Ongoing/ Continuation in 2020 Centennial Lakes Parks being identified as focus to inventory of signs, potential costs and resources needed. City publications such as Edition Edina are being translated into Spanish and Somali via electronic versions. Employees will be trained on how to support first-time guests of City facilities.2020 - Q4 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 Due to COVD-19, no in person training with Parks and Recreation has taken place in 2020. Looking into training for 2021. GOAL:TARGET STATUS PROGRESS Add Metro transit link to facility website(s).2018 - Q4 Complete Links for Metro Transit has been added to facility website. Staff will create a standing City communications “Feedback Group" of volunteer residents that can be called upon via meeting, email, or as needed for both strategic and quick feedback to staff.2018 - Q4 Complete/ Ongoing Group has been assembled. First meeting in January 2019 and group will have ongoing meetings to receive feedback. Communications Feedback Group continues to meet. The new City Community Engagement employee will ensure there is a robust community engagement approach, informed by ongoing relationship with residents, residents of color and residents for whom English is a second language. 2019 - Q1 Complete/ Ongoing Community Engagement Coordinator continues to adapt engagement approach while looking at potential opportunity gaps to increase diversity. Optional demogaphic questions have been updated to align with Parks and Recreation registration system. The City will include questions on racial equity work in the 2019 Quality of Life Survey.2019 - Q1 Complete Survey included racial and self indicators to provide baseline information to help support racial equity work. Planning for 2021 Quality of Life has already begun. Develop protocol and procedures to apply a race and equity perspective to communications content.2019 - Q2 Complete/ Continuous in 2020 The HRRC has reviewed document and changes updated based on feedback. The protocol and procedures is a working document that will be revised as need to ensure relevance. Evaluate and improve the police department's current Community Outreach Programs. Consider opportunities for community members to engage with the department.2019 - Q2 Ongoing Due to COVID-19, many of Police Department Outreach Programs have been placed cancelled or on hold. During Community Outreach Program Evaluation, the police department will develop communication strategies to publicize and promote the department through communication methods including social media. 2019 - Q2 Ongoing Due to COVID-19, many of Police Department Outreach Programs have been placed cancelled or on hold. Develop a strategic approach to the city's community engagement efforts. Task a city employee with overseeing/directing community engagement work.2019 - Q4 Complete/ Ongoing Community Engagement Coordinator continues community members to engage, inform, and participate in city work, such as Better Together Edina, Boards and Commissions, and through community impact surveys. Google Translate has been added to Better Together Edina site. COMMUNITY ENGAGMENT & COMMUNICATIONS CITY FACILITIES & SERVICES Updated 5.13.2021 Page 2 of 4 Racial Equity Work Plan GOAL:TARGET STATUS PROGRESS The City will develop plain language policy and an LEP (Limited English Proficiency) policy for City communications.2019 - Q4 Complete/ Continued into 2020 Plain Language Policy has been developed and training for staff has been completed. Limited English Profeciency policy has been approved. Frontline staff members have been provided training and LanguageLine phone number cards. Use insights gained from new partnerships and relationships with community, the City will find new ways to market and communicate to POC.2019 - Q4 Complete/ Ongoing Communications is continuing relationships with media outlets who focus on people of color and has been begun to distribute City of Edina press releases through modes such as text updates from the City and focus of accessibilty of communications in multiple languagses. Develop alternate ways to register for programs or use of City facilities. The city will develop new ways to reach and welcome new and underserved populations into the community.2019 - Q4 Ongoing/ Continuous Google Translate option on website and Connect Card being promoted on Activity Directory. City partnering with Edina Community Education on "New to Edina" event in 2021. The Police Department will conduct a review of the Crime Report policy for posting individual names on the department website.2019 - Q4 Complete Weekly Crime Reports, as of October 7, 2019, names of individuals have been removed. The report contains age and gender of individuals and location of report. Archive timeframe changed from 6 months to 2 months. Discussion to monitor if there are changes in staff workflow based on change as well potential equity challenges that arise in the future. GOAL:TARGET STATUS PROGRESS Make a language edit to the Edina Affordable Housing Policy: The City recognizes the need to provide affordable housing in order to create and maintain a diverse population and to provide housing for those who live or work in the City. 2018 - Q4 Complete/ Ongoing Approved by Council October 2018. Policy is reviewed yearly. Last reviewed in March 2021. Develop goals and policies to increase the number of affordable housing units and rental until where housing assistance vouchers (ex. Section 8) can be used.2018 - Q4 Complete/ Ongoing Every owner/developer that has affordable housing units and rentals in Edina receives an affordable housing guide that includes non-discriminatory language. Request the Edina Housing Foundation to review the affordable housing policy to specifically consider removing the option for developers to opt-out of building affordable units.2019 - Q2 Complete Reviewed Affordable Housing Policy with Edina Housing Foundation to remove opt-out option. Decision to not remove opt-out policy because funds from Affordable Housing Trust Fund could be used to further program. Policy is reviewed yearly. Develop City-wide procedure and policy for responding to complaints that are perceived by staff as possibly racially motivated. Collect data on complaints that seem discriminatory in nature, including who makes the complaints and about whom. Apply this policy to complaints against those belonging to other protected groups. 2019 - Q2 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 Bias and Discrimination Form has been added to City and Better Together Edina websites for community members to complete. The form is being reviewed for changes and providing resources for staff members. Researching compliant intake process for departments that receive compliants from community members. Review affordable housing policy annually to address current conditions and needs. Ensure race and equity policy perspective is used at each review period.2019 - Q4 Complete/ Ongoing Affordable Housing Policy reviewed and presented to Council in Q1-2020. Policy is reviewed annually. Review Edina zoning regulations through a racial equity lens to change or remove language that may contribute to racial disparities. Develop language with the intention of reducing inequities in the City's zoning regulations. 2019 - Q4 Ongoing/ Continuation in 2020 Community Development will scaffold additional zoning regulations through a race and equity lens each year. This is will be an ongoing work plan item as zoning ordinances are reviewed individually. Starting to collect data on impact of garage and basement ordinances changes. Review process on using affordable housing funds received from the opt-out option and develop a policy to ensure funds will be used with a race and equity lens.2019 - Q4 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 A formallized process is currently being used for "buy-in" options funds for land trust and other opportunities through a race and equity lens is being created. DEVELOPMENT & ENFORCEMENT OF POLICIES COMMUNITY ENGAGMENT & COMMUNICATIONS Updated 5.13.2021 Page 3 of 4 Racial Equity Work Plan GOAL:TARGET STATUS PROGRESS Review policy and outline requirement and enforcement mechanism to ensure associations and vendors that utilize/rent City facilities are operating in accordance with the city's expectation regarding race equity and inclusion. Post the policy throughout City facilities. 2019 - Q4 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 Feedback from REAT and has been presented to Parks and Recreation Commission for review. The policies are currently being reviewed to compile to create more alignment for all associations and vendors - paused until Q2-2021. Study and report on the 21st Century Policing Initiative's alignment with City of Edina's police officer field training processes.2019 - Q4 Complete 21st Century Policing Initiative review has been completed by Police Department. The Police Department will evaluate the Department Policy Manual through a race and equity lens related to use of force.2019 - Q4 Complete Use of Force Policy has been reviewed and placed on City website in Police Department. Policy is updated when POST Board provides edits/revisions. Review the Police Department’s Policy 690.00 of Impartial Policing.2019 - Q4 Complete Police Department Policy 690.00 of Impartial Policing has been reviewed, updated and placed on the City website for public. The Police Department will analyze policies related to external and independent criminal investigations and prosecutions for Officer Involved shootings and In-Custody death incidents.2019 - Q4 Complete Officer involved shooting policy has been updated to include audio/video retention, supervisor to assist, and who speaks with media. Review the Police Department's Conduct of Department Members and Persons of Detained or In- Custody policies and consider adding a provision to current policies requiring officers to identify to individuals stopped or detained as soon as practical and reasonable. 2019 - Q4 Complete Review of Conduct of Department Members and Persons Detained or In-Custoday policies have been completed and added on Police Department website . Review feasibility of developing a policy to create an incentive for sellers to take Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loans.2019 - TBD Complete/ Continuation in 2020 Based on research of feasibility, process for FHA approval is cumbersome and expensive. An alternative process would be potentially combining mortgage with Come Home 2 Edina mortgage. GOAL:TARGET STATUS PROGRESS Participate in a Twin Cities People of Color (POC) job fair in 2019 as either an employer or sponsor.2019 - Q4 Complete City staff and leadership participated in the October 2019 People of Color Job Fair in Minneapolis. Develop diversity recruiting strategy for City employees that identifies specific actions to be taken on an annual basis to more closely reflect demographics or Hennepin County.2019 - Q4 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 With launch of new ERP system, human resource has been focused on transition to new system. Tracking of racial demographics in applications, interview, and hiring process are being collected. Length of retention for hired employees will also start. At the end of the 2020. data will be reviewed from 2019, 2020 to determine trends and look at strategies. Staffing will be focusing creating a strategy that distinguishes between sourcing and recruiting. Human Resources staff will implement hiring practices to include more racially and culturally diverse outreach, inclusive applications questions, recruitment, selection and interview processes.2019 - Q4 Complete Application process has been revised such as interview question has been added through a race/diversity lens, interview panel training for staff. These changes have been completed and the next step will be assess the effectiveness of the changes. Hiring manager training will be reviewed in 2021. The City will assess and revise job descriptions as positions become available to include racial equity competencies.2019 - Q4 Ongoing/ Continuation in 2020 Job descriptions are being revised when positions are available for hiring. A race and equity competency general statement has been added when job descriptions are being revised. A welcoming and inclusive statement has been added to Edina job posting website. Train employees on the City code of conduct, safety and security procedures, language interpretation services and cost options.2019 - Q4 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 Due to COVD-19, no in person training with Parks and Recreation has taken place in 2020 or Q1-2021. All City training offered to staff is being compiled to assess feasibilty of combining certain trainings to avoid redundancy. Set goals of increasing the percentage of fulltime staff who are people of color and/or fluent in a language other than English.2019 - Q4 Ongoing/ Continuous in 2020 There has been an increase in People of Color who have applied, interviewed, and hired in 2019 and 2020 will be complied by end of Q2-2021. The City will include data on its employment goals in the Racial Equity Advancement Annual Report starting in 2020 for employment activities in 2019. 2020 - Q4 In Progress Human Resources and Race and Equity Coordinator gathering yearly data from human resource management system. This work plan will coincide with looking at the data set of people who applied, inerview and have been hired in 2019 and 2020. Anticipated by Q2-2021. EMPLOYEE TRAINING & DIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT & ENFORCEMENT OF POLICIES Updated 5.13.2021 Page 4 of 4 Date: May 18, 2021 Agenda Item #: VIII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Kris Aaker, Assistant Planner Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2021-40, Denying Appeal Request for Reasonable Accommodation at 6222 Braeburn Circle Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to close the public hearing at noon, May 26, 2021 and to continue action on these items to the June 1, 2021 City Council meeting. INTRODUCTION: Scott Hemenway/The Geneva Suites, 6222 Braeburn Circle, is requesting reasonable accommodation to increase resident occupancy from the permitted 6 residents to 10 residents in a facility having a Housing with Services certificate from Minnesota Department of Health HFID: 33436 and a Minnesota Department of Health Comprehensive Home Care License. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-40, Denying Appeal Request for Reasonable Accommodation at 6222 Braeburn Circle Staff Memos to Planning Commission, April 14 Better Together Public Hearing Comments Site Location, Survey, and Plans Applicant Narrative and Attachments Letter and Enclosures from Bill Griffith Letter and Petition from Neighbors RESOLUTION NO. 2021- 40 DENYING A REQUEST FOR REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION TO INCREASE CURRENT RESIDENT OCCUPANCY FROM PERMITTED 6 RESIDENTS BY STATE STATUTES TO 10 FOR A CARE SERVICES GROUP HOME /GENEVA SUITES RESIDENCE, 6222 BRAEBURN CIRCLE. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 The Planning Commission was asked to consider a request from the owner Geneva Suites (Geneva) for a reasonable accommodation under the Fair Housing Amendments Act (FHAA or Act) to increase resident occupancy from six residents as permitted by State Statute to ten residents. 1.02 The subject property is located at 6222 Braeburn Circle, consisting of a 5,500 square foot single dwelling zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District. The current use, which is a six resident group home, is a permitted use for this District under Minn. Stat. §462.357 subd. 7. At this address, Geneva has a Housing with Services Certificate from Minnesota Department of Health, HFID: 33436, and offers Assisted Living Services and Dementia Program through an agreement with a licensed home care provider. 1.03 If granted this accommodation, the applicant would then remodel the six-bedroom facility to add an elevator and add four more bedrooms on the lower level. 1.04 On April 14, 2021, the Planning Commission recommended denying the request to increase occupancy from six to ten residents. Vote: 6 Ayes and 1 Nay. Section 2. FINDINGS Denial is based on the following findings: 2.01 Under the United States Fair Housing Amendments Act (FHAA), a city practice, policy, or ordinance cannot explicitly treat members of a protected group differently than others who are similarly situated, cannot disproportionately exclude or otherwise harm the housing opportunities of a class of persons protected by the FHAA, or refuse to make reasonable accommodations in land use rules when such accommodations may be necessary to afford such person equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. A reasonable accommodation is a change, exception, or adjustment to a rule, policy, practice or service that may be necessary for a person with a disability to have an equal opportunity to use a dwelling. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-40 Page 2 2.02 The City of Edina’s Planning Commission has denied the requested accommodation, a change from six residents to ten residents, because it is found to be unreasonable and not necessary under the FHAA. 2.03 The issues of whether this group home should be allowed to operate in its current location, whether this group homes provides a valuable resource to the community, and whether this group home affirmatively enhances the quality of life of disabled persons by lessening the effects of their disabilities are not in dispute. The City acknowledges and supports the fact that this group home and the many other group homes in our City provide a valuable resource to the community and enhance the quality of life of disabled persons. The sole question is whether an increase in residents from six to ten at this location is reasonable and necessary under the FHAA. 2.04 The Planning Commission was required to consider the request in light of the following FHAA framework: 1. Whether there is an Existence of a Disability. Most residents of this facility may be afflicted by memory loss, Alzheimer’s Disease, movement disorders, or Parkinson’s Disease. Under the FHAA, residents who have these diagnoses do have a physical or mental impairment that substantially impacts a major life activity which means they do have a disability and are covered persons under the FHAA. 2. Whether the Accommodation is Necessary within the meaning of the statute. The proposed accommodation to increase occupancy from six to ten residents was not shown to be necessary because the application failed to show that increasing the limit to ten persons is necessary to provide additional enjoyment, benefit, or use of the residence for disabled persons. a. In the context of the FHAA, demonstration that an accommodation is “necessary” requires a showing that the desired accommodation will affirmatively enhance the quality of life of disabled persons by lessening the effects of the disability. The applicant did not show, either in the application materials or at the hearing, that increasing the resident limit to ten would provide more enjoyment, more use, or more medical advantage for persons with disabilities. In fact, the applicant indicated staffing would remain the same from six to ten residents with no additional staff at any one time on-site to assist with the increase in occupancy. b. Applicant presented insufficient evidence indicating why the increase from six people to ten is necessary as determined under the FHAA. Applicant presented no evidence to indicate how allowing ten residents at this location would enhance the quality of life or lessen the effects of the disability in a way that allowing six residents does not. 3. Whether the Request is Reasonable. In determining the reasonableness of the accommodation request, the Commission applied its collective judgment to following FHAA criteria: a. Whether the Accommodation Will Fundamentally Alter the Zoning Scheme. If a requested accommodation would fundamentally alter the zoning scheme of the RESOLUTION NO. 2021-40 Page 3 neighborhood, then the accommodation requested is unreasonable and need not be granted. • This area is zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District. The neighborhood is single-family or single-dwelling residential for at least ½ mile to 1 mile in every direction. There are no nearby parcels that are zoned to permit multi-dwelling units. According to the City’s Comprehensive Plan there is no intention to have multi-dwelling units anywhere in this vicinity in the future. • There are other group home facilities in this neighborhood that also are limited to six residents and are operating successfully. • Under state statute, this change would result in the property being classified as a multi-dwelling unit rather than a single-dwelling unit. This change would lead to greater traffic, greater demand for on-site parking, and greater demand for street parking on Braeburn Circle and surrounding streets due to an anticipated increase in delivery workers, visitors, emergency vehicles, and staff. • From January 1, 2021 to April 19, 2021 there have been 11 emergency calls received by the City originating from the applicant’s property on Braeburn Circle. The 11 calls during this time include: o 6 calls for “sick person” o 1 call for “falls” o 1 call for “chest pain” o 1 call for “theft” o 1 call for “disturbance” o 1 call for “missing person” • This represents an unusually high volume of calls by the standards of the neighborhood. Increasing the number of residents in this group home by 66% would likely result in a commensurate increase number of emergency calls. This demand for this one property is outsized compared to neighbors in the immediate and extended vicinity, and not in character with the zoning scheme of the neighborhood. • Currently, the parking needs of the six resident facility overflows off of the applicant’s property and onto the street. Increasing the number residents will only increase the demand for street parking and consequentially impact more of the neighborhood. • Vehicle trips generated by the group home will increase, further eroding the single dwelling residential character of the neighborhood. The increase in number of occupants could increase traffic associated with the group home including: employees arriving and leaving some of which are dropped- off or picked-up by waiting vehicles idling in the street for extended RESOLUTION NO. 2021-40 Page 4 amounts of time. There also will be an increase in deliveries, service vehicles, emergency service calls, and visitors • The parking plan submitted by the applicant indicated that cars will stack within the driveway in three rows. If nothing is available, residents, staff, visitors, maintenance crews, and delivery drivers will park in the street. The 66% increase of residents within the home will have an increased demand on the traffic flow and on-site parking and increase street parking, altering the character of the neighborhood, and creating the appearance of a commercial- medical use within a residential zoning district. • Edina City Code provides that maintaining, protecting, and enhancing single- unit neighborhoods as the dominate land use is a primary objective of the zoning code. Sec. 36-2-Objectives. • The property, if permitted to have four additional residents, would be the only multi-dwelling unit property in this broader neighborhood. This would change the feel and intended design of this single-dwelling zoning district namely due to the increase in traffic flow and parking demands. • The increase to ten residents would fundamentally alter the character of the neighborhood. Therefore, this request for an accommodation is not reasonable. b. Whether the Accommodation Will Impose an Undue Burden and Expense on the City. If the accommodation imposes an undue burden and expense on the city, then the accommodation is unreasonable and need not be granted. • As mentioned above with respect to traffic flow, there is already great demand for emergency service calls to this property and increasing the number of residents by 66% will necessarily increase the demand for these City-provided emergency services. • The request will impose an undue burden and expense on the City. Because there will be a direct and substantial increase in the demand for emergency services provided by the City. • The increase to ten residents would result in an undue burden and expense on the City. Therefore, this request for an accommodation is unreasonable and need not be granted. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-40 Page 5 Section 3. DENIAL: NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, denies the request for an accommodation under the FHAA to increase resident occupancy from the six residents as permitted by State Statute, to ten residents. 1. The City supports the fact that this group home provides a valuable resource to the community and enhances the quality of life of disabled persons. Further, the City is proud to have a number of six resident group homes in our single-dwelling unit districts. 2. The proposed accommodation to increase occupancy from six to ten residents is not reasonable because it would fundamentally alter the zoning scheme due to the change in neighborhood character. Namely, the increase in the volume of traffic and parking will alter the essential residential character of the neighborhood. 3. The proposed accommodation to increase occupancy from six to ten residents is not shown to be necessary under the applicable legal standard because six disabled persons currently derive enjoyment, benefit, and use of the residence, and there was an insufficient showing that increasing the limit to ten residents is necessary to provide enjoyment, benefit, or use of the residence for disabled persons. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on June 1, 2021. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 2021-40 Page 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 1, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2021. _________________________________ City Clerk The subject property is located at 6222 Braeburn Circle, consisting of a 5,500 square foot single dwelling zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District. The use on site is a permitted use care services group home facility for six residents. The Planning Commission is asked to consider a variance request from the owner Geneva Suites (Geneva) for “reasonable accommodation” under the Fair Housing Amendments Act (FHAA or Act) to increase resident occupancy from the permitted 6 residents by State Statute, to 10 residents in a group home facility. At this address, Geneva has a Housing with Services Certificate from Minnesota Department of Health HFID: 33436 and offers Assisted Living Services and Dementia Program through an agreement with a licensed home care provider. (See attached State Statute.) The applicant is proposing to remodel the interior of the six-bedroom facility with the addition of four bedrooms proposed in the lower level. An elevator installation is part of the remodel to access both the main and basement floors. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single Family Residences; zoned R-1, Low Density Residential and Guided Low Density Residential Easterly: Single Family Residences; zoned R-1, Low Density Residential and Guided Low Density Residential Southerly: Single Family Residences; zoned R-1, Low Density Residential and Guided Low Density Westerly: Single Family Residences; zoned R-1, Low Density Residential and Guided Low Density Residential April 14, 2021 PLANNING COMMISSION Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner B-21-06, A variance request for reasonable accommodation to increase current resident occupancy from the permitted 6 residents by State Statutes to10 residents for a care services group home business/The Geneva Suites residence, located at 6222 Braeburn Circle. Information / Background: STAFF REPORT Page 2 Existing Site Features The subject property is 27,450 square feet in size and contains the Geneva Suites group home. The care facility was remodeled from a standard single dwelling unit in 2017 for the purposes of operating a group home care facility business. The current group home care facility business with a maximum of 6 residents is a permitted use on the property and has operated as a group home since the remodel in 2017. Planning Guide Plan designation: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District Compliance Table *Requires variance in the form of accommodation under the federal law PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues The Act prohibits discrimination related to housing against individuals on the basis of a disability. With respect to cities, the Act prohibits discriminatory zoning or land use ordinances or discriminatory zoning or land use decisions. A city practice, policy, or ordinance cannot explicitly treat members of a protected group differently than others who are similarly situated, cannot disproportionately exclude or otherwise harm the housing opportunities of a class of persons protected by the Act, or refuse to make reasonable accommodations in land use rules when such accommodations may be necessary to afford such person equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. A reasonable accommodation is a change, exception, or adjustment to a rule, policy, practice or service that may be necessary for a person with a disability to have an equal opportunity to use a dwelling. Although the Planning Commission is fluent in the standards for a typical variance, in this case those legal standards do not apply. The variance application process is acting as a vehicle for Permitted by State Statute/City Standard Proposed Number of occupants in a resident care facility 6 occupants 10 occupants* STAFF REPORT Page 3 the Planning Commission to consider the reasonable accommodation request. All of the following questions must be answered in the affirmative in order to grant the reasonable accommodation: a. Existence of a Disability. Do the residents have a physical or mental impairment that substantially impacts a major life activity? b. Necessity. Will the variance request affirmatively enhance the quality of life of a person with a physical or mental impairment? c. Reasonableness. Is the accommodation request reasonable? In determining the reasonableness of the accommodation request, the commission should apply its collective judgment and follow the following criteria: • Does the request impose an undue burden or expense on the City? • Does the proposed use create a fundamental alteration in the zoning scheme? If the answer to either question is “yes” the application is not reasonable and can be denied. Disability The Act defines a person with a disability to include (1) individuals with a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities; (2) individuals who are regarded as having such an impairment; and (3) individuals with a record of such an impairment. In this case, the current and future residents of Geneva have either physical impairment issues with mobility or mental impairment issues such as Alzheimer’s. The residents qualify as persons with a disability under the definition established in the Act. Necessity According to the Act, it is unlawful discrimination to refuse to make a reasonable accommodation when such an accommodation may be necessary to afford a disabled person equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. If the accommodation is deemed not necessary, then the request can be denied. In this case, six persons with disabilities currently enjoy equal opportunity to use and enjoy this dwelling. In the context of the Act, demonstration that an accommodation is “necessary” requires a showing that the desired accommodation will affirmatively enhance the quality of life of disabled persons by lessening the effects of the disability. Geneva must show that increasing the resident limit to 10 persons would provide more enjoyment, more use, or more medical advantage for persons with disabilities. Staff believes that Applicant presented insufficient evidence to the City indicating why the increases from six people to ten is necessary. Applicant presented insufficient evidence to indicate how allowing ten residents at this location would enhance the quality of life or lessen the effects of the disability in a way that allowing six residents would not. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Reasonable In determining whether the requested accommodation is reasonable, commissioners should evaluate whether it: 1. imposes an undue burden or expense on the City or 2. creates a fundamental alteration in the zoning scheme. A request will be considered “reasonable” only if the answers to both of these questions is “no.” Undue Burden or Expense An accommodation is not reasonable if it imposes undue financial and administrative burdens. Undue burden or expense include any specialized burdens on municipal services, but any identified burden must be significantly more than a normal home and rise to a clear financial burden on the community. Fundamental Alteration in the Zoning Scheme An accommodation is not reasonable if it requires a substantial and fundamental modification to the city’s land-use and zoning scheme. The Department of Justice and Department of Housing and Urban Development state that what is considered “reasonable” in one circumstance may not be “reasonable” in another. For example, a four-person home for disabled adults in a single-family zoned neighborhood is likely reasonable, but a 50-bed nursing home in a single-family zoned neighborhood is likely unreasonable. The City must consider the scope and magnitude of the modification requested and the features of the surrounding neighborhood in order to make a determination. The Commission should take into account emergency calls, maintenance and repair of the buildings, traffic and parking, garbage and recycling management, and the character of the neighborhood are all relevant. Staff has concerns that the added number of residents to the home would increase the high volume of traffic flow and reliance upon on-street parking and would alter the zoning scheme. Parking currently occurs on the existing residential driveway and within the street when needed. (See the applicant’s parking policy.) Section 36-1254 (a) (5) of the City’s customary home occupation ordinance states that “All parking demands generated by the use (a customary home occupation) shall be accommodated within the accessory garage and the normal driveway area…” As indicated on the parking plan, cars stack within the driveway in three rows. If nothing is available within the driveway, residents, staff, visitors, maintenance crews, and delivery drivers will park in the street. (See attached parking plan.) Cars within the driveway could easily be boxed in by other cars and not be able to get out of the driveway easily. The increase to 10 residents within the home will have an increased demand on the on-site traffic flow and parking, and increase on-street parking, altering the character of the neighborhood, and creating more of the appearance of a commercial/medical operation within a residential zoning district. STAFF REPORT Page 5 If the decision is made to grant the accommodation, reasonable terms and conditions designed to improve the use may be imposed, provided they meet the general nexus and proportionality requirements. Whether the Commission recommends granting the accommodation or denying the accommodation, findings and conclusions must be made on the record to ensure that a reviewing court can determine whether the decision is reasonable. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Commission deny the requested variance to allow an increase from 6 to 10 residents in the existing home care group home facility at 6222 Braeburn Circle based on the following findings: 1. According to the Fair Housing Amendments Act, it is unlawful to refuse to make a reasonable accommodation when such an accommodation is necessary to afford disabled persons equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. 2. The issues of whether this group home should be allowed to operate in its current location, whether this group homes provides a valuable resource to the community, and whether this group home affirmatively enhances the quality of life of disabled persons by lessening the effects of their disabilities are not in dispute. The City acknowledges and supports the fact that this group home provides a valuable resource to the community and enhances the quality of life of disabled persons. The sole question is whether an increase in residents from six to ten is reasonable and necessary under the Fair Housing Amendments Act. 3. The proposed accommodation to increase occupancy from 6 to 10 residents is not reasonable because it would fundamentally alter the zoning scheme due to the change in neighborhood character. Namely, the increase in the volume of traffic and parking will alter the essential residential character of the neighborhood. 4. The proposed accommodation to increase occupancy from 6 to 10 residents is not shown to be necessary under the applicable legal standard because there not sufficient showing that increasing the limit to 10 persons is necessary to provide additional enjoyment, benefit, or use of the residence for disabled persons. 5. Section 36-1254 (a) (5) of the City’s customary home occupation ordinance states that “All parking demands generated by the use shall be accommodated within the accessory garage and the normal driveway area…” As indicated on the parking plan, cars stack within the driveway in three rows. If nothing is available, residents, staff, visitors, maintenance crews and delivery drivers will park in the street. The increase to 10 residents within the home will have an increased demand on the traffic flow and on-site parking and increase street parking, altering the character of the neighborhood, and creating more of the appearance of a commercial/medical operation within a residential zoning district. 462.357 OFFICIAL CONTROLS: ZONING ORDINANCE. Subdivision 1.Authority for zoning.For the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals, and general welfare, a municipality may by ordinance regulate on the earth's surface, in the air space above the surface, and in subsurface areas, the location, height, width, bulk, type of foundation, number of stories, size of buildings and other structures, the percentage of lot which may be occupied, the size of yards and other open spaces, the density and distribution of population, the uses of buildings and structures for trade, industry, residence, recreation, public activities, or other purposes, and the uses of land for trade, industry, residence, recreation, agriculture, forestry, soil conservation, water supply conservation, conservation of shorelands, as defined in sections 103F.201 to 103F.221, access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems as defined in section 216C.06, flood control or other purposes, and may establish standards and procedures regulating such uses. To accomplish these purposes, official controls may include provision for purchase of development rights by the governing body in the form of conservation easements under chapter 84C in areas where the governing body considers preservation desirable and the transfer of development rights from those areas to areas the governing body considers more appropriate for development. No regulation may prohibit earth sheltered construction as defined in section 216C.06, subdivision 14, relocated residential buildings, or manufactured homes built in conformance with sections 327.31 to 327.35 that comply with all other zoning ordinances promulgated pursuant to this section. The regulations may divide the surface, above surface, and subsurface areas of the municipality into districts or zones of suitable numbers, shape, and area. The regulations shall be uniform for each class or kind of buildings, structures, or land and for each class or kind of use throughout such district, but the regulations in one district may differ from those in other districts. The ordinance embodying these regulations shall be known as the zoning ordinance and shall consist of text and maps. A city may by ordinance extend the application of its zoning regulations to unincorporated territory located within two miles of its limits in any direction, but not in a county or town which has adopted zoning regulations; provided that where two or more noncontiguous municipalities have boundaries less than four miles apart, each is authorized to control the zoning of land on its side of a line equidistant between the two noncontiguous municipalities unless a town or county in the affected area has adopted zoning regulations. Any city may thereafter enforce such regulations in the area to the same extent as if such property were situated within its corporate limits, until the county or town board adopts a comprehensive zoning regulation which includes the area. Subd. 1a.Certain zoning ordinances.A municipality must not enact, amend, or enforce a zoning ordinance that has the effect of altering the existing density, lot-size requirements, or manufactured home setback requirements in any manufactured home park constructed before January 1, 1995, if the manufactured home park, when constructed, complied with the then existing density, lot-size and setback requirements. Subd. 1b.Conditional uses.A manufactured home park, as defined in section 327.14, subdivision 3, is a conditional use in a zoning district that allows the construction or placement of a building used or intended to be used by two or more families. Subd. 1c.Amortization prohibited.Except as otherwise provided in this subdivision, a municipality must not enact, amend, or enforce an ordinance providing for the elimination or termination of a use by amortization which use was lawful at the time of its inception. This subdivision does not apply to adults-only bookstores, adults-only theaters, or similar adults-only businesses, as defined by ordinance. Subd. 1d.Nuisance.Subdivision 1c does not prohibit a municipality from enforcing an ordinance providing for the prevention or abatement of nuisances, as defined in section 561.01, or eliminating a use determined to be a public nuisance, as defined in section 617.81, subdivision 2, paragraph (a), clauses (i) to (ix), without payment of compensation. Official Publication of the State of Minnesota Revisor of Statutes 462.357MINNESOTA STATUTES 20201 Subd. 1e.Nonconformities.(a) Except as otherwise provided by law, any nonconformity, including the lawful use or occupation of land or premises existing at the time of the adoption of an additional control under this chapter, may be continued, including through repair, replacement, restoration, maintenance, or improvement, but not including expansion, unless: (1) the nonconformity or occupancy is discontinued for a period of more than one year; or (2) any nonconforming use is destroyed by fire or other peril to the extent of greater than 50 percent of its estimated market value, as indicated in the records of the county assessor at the time of damage, and no building permit has been applied for within 180 days of when the property is damaged. In this case, a municipality may impose reasonable conditions upon a zoning or building permit in order to mitigate any newly created impact on adjacent property or water body. When a nonconforming structure in the shoreland district with less than 50 percent of the required setback from the water is destroyed by fire or other peril to greater than 50 percent of its estimated market value, as indicated in the records of the county assessor at the time of damage, the structure setback may be increased if practicable and reasonable conditions are placed upon a zoning or building permit to mitigate created impacts on the adjacent property or water body. (b) Any subsequent use or occupancy of the land or premises shall be a conforming use or occupancy. A municipality may, by ordinance, permit an expansion or impose upon nonconformities reasonable regulations to prevent and abate nuisances and to protect the public health, welfare, or safety. This subdivision does not prohibit a municipality from enforcing an ordinance that applies to adults-only bookstores, adults-only theaters, or similar adults-only businesses, as defined by ordinance. (c) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), a municipality shall regulate the repair, replacement, maintenance, improvement, or expansion of nonconforming uses and structures in floodplain areas to the extent necessary to maintain eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program and not increase flood damage potential or increase the degree of obstruction to flood flows in the floodway. (d) Paragraphs (d) to (j) apply to shoreland lots of record in the office of the county recorder on the date of adoption of local shoreland controls that do not meet the requirements for lot size or lot width. A municipality shall regulate the use of nonconforming lots of record and the repair, replacement, maintenance, improvement, or expansion of nonconforming uses and structures in shoreland areas according to paragraphs (d) to (j). (e) A nonconforming single lot of record located within a shoreland area may be allowed as a building site without variances from lot size requirements, provided that: (1) all structure and septic system setback distance requirements can be met; (2) a Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules, chapter 7080, can be installed or the lot is connected to a public sewer; and (3) the impervious surface coverage does not exceed 25 percent of the lot. (f) In a group of two or more contiguous lots of record under a common ownership, an individual lot must be considered as a separate parcel of land for the purpose of sale or development, if it meets the following requirements: (1) the lot must be at least 66 percent of the dimensional standard for lot width and lot size for the shoreland classification consistent with Minnesota Rules, chapter 6120; Official Publication of the State of Minnesota Revisor of Statutes 2MINNESOTA STATUTES 2020462.357 (2) the lot must be connected to a public sewer, if available, or must be suitable for the installation of a Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules, chapter 7080, and local government controls; (3) impervious surface coverage must not exceed 25 percent of each lot; and (4) development of the lot must be consistent with an adopted comprehensive plan. (g) A lot subject to paragraph (f) not meeting the requirements of paragraph (f) must be combined with the one or more contiguous lots so they equal one or more conforming lots as much as possible. (h) Notwithstanding paragraph (f), contiguous nonconforming lots of record in shoreland areas under a common ownership must be able to be sold or purchased individually if each lot contained a habitable residential dwelling at the time the lots came under common ownership and the lots are suitable for, or served by, a sewage treatment system consistent with the requirements of section 115.55 and Minnesota Rules, chapter 7080, or connected to a public sewer. (i) In evaluating all variances, zoning and building permit applications, or conditional use requests, the zoning authority shall require the property owner to address, when appropriate, storm water runoff management, reducing impervious surfaces, increasing setback, restoration of wetlands, vegetative buffers, sewage treatment and water supply capabilities, and other conservation-designed actions. (j) A portion of a conforming lot may be separated from an existing parcel as long as the remainder of the existing parcel meets the lot size and sewage treatment requirements of the zoning district for a new lot and the newly created parcel is combined with an adjacent parcel. Subd. 1f.Substandard structures.Notwithstanding subdivision 1e, Minnesota Rules, parts 6105.0351 to 6105.0550, may allow for the continuation and improvement of substandard structures, as defined in Minnesota Rules, part 6105.0354, subpart 30, in the Lower Saint Croix National Scenic Riverway. Subd. 1g.Feedlot zoning controls.(a) A municipality proposing to adopt a new feedlot zoning control or to amend an existing feedlot zoning control must notify the Pollution Control Agency and commissioner of agriculture at the beginning of the process, no later than the date notice is given of the first hearing proposing to adopt or amend a zoning control purporting to address feedlots. (b) Prior to final approval of a feedlot zoning control, the governing body of a municipality may submit a copy of the proposed zoning control to the Pollution Control Agency and to the commissioner of agriculture and request review, comment, and recommendations on the environmental and agricultural effects from specific provisions in the ordinance. (c) The agencies' response to the municipality may include: (1) any recommendations for improvements in the ordinance; and (2) the legal, social, economic, or scientific justification for each recommendation under clause (1). (d) At the request of the municipality's governing body, the municipality must prepare a report on the economic effects from specific provisions in the ordinance. Economic analysis must state whether the ordinance will affect the local economy and describe the kinds of businesses affected and the projected impact the proposal will have on those businesses. To assist the municipality, the commissioner of agriculture, in cooperation with the Department of Employment and Economic Development, must develop a template for measuring local economic effects and make it available to the municipality. The report must be submitted Official Publication of the State of Minnesota Revisor of Statutes 462.357MINNESOTA STATUTES 20203 to the commissioners of employment and economic development and agriculture along with the proposed ordinance. (e) A local ordinance that contains a setback for new feedlots from existing residences must also provide for a new residence setback from existing feedlots located in areas zoned agricultural at the same distances and conditions specified in the setback for new feedlots, unless the new residence is built to replace an existing residence. A municipality may grant a variance from this requirement under section 462.358, subdivision 6. Subd. 1h.Comprehensive plans in greater Minnesota; open spaces.When adopting or updating a comprehensive plan in a municipality located within a county that is not a greater than 80 percent area, as defined in section 103G.005, subdivision 10b, and that is located outside the metropolitan area, as defined by section 473.121, subdivision 2, the municipality shall consider adopting goals and objectives for the preservation of agricultural, forest, wildlife, and open space land and the minimization of development in sensitive shoreland areas. Within three years of updating the comprehensive plan, the municipality shall consider adopting ordinances as part of the municipality's official controls that encourage the implementation of the goals and objectives. Subd. 1i.Airport safety zones on zoning maps.Airport safety zones must be included on maps that illustrate boundaries of zoning districts and that are adopted as official controls. Subd. 2.General requirements.(a) At any time after the adoption of a land use plan for the municipality, the planning agency, for the purpose of carrying out the policies and goals of the land use plan, may prepare a proposed zoning ordinance and submit it to the governing body with its recommendations for adoption. (b) Subject to the requirements of subdivisions 3, 4, and 5, the governing body may adopt and amend a zoning ordinance by a majority vote of all its members. The adoption or amendment of any portion of a zoning ordinance which changes all or part of the existing classification of a zoning district from residential to either commercial or industrial requires a two-thirds majority vote of all members of the governing body. (c) The land use plan must provide guidelines for the timing and sequence of the adoption of official controls to ensure planned, orderly, and staged development and redevelopment consistent with the land use plan. Subd. 3.Public hearings.No zoning ordinance or amendment thereto shall be adopted until a public hearing has been held thereon by the planning agency or by the governing body. A notice of the time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official newspaper of the municipality at least ten days prior to the day of the hearing. When an amendment involves changes in district boundaries affecting an area of five acres or less, a similar notice shall be mailed at least ten days before the day of the hearing to each owner of affected property and property situated wholly or partly within 350 feet of the property to which the amendment relates. For the purpose of giving mailed notice, the person responsible for mailing the notice may use any appropriate records to determine the names and addresses of owners. A copy of the notice and a list of the owners and addresses to which the notice was sent shall be attested to by the responsible person and shall be made a part of the records of the proceedings. The failure to give mailed notice to individual property owners, or defects in the notice shall not invalidate the proceedings, provided a bona fide attempt to comply with this subdivision has been made. Subd. 4.Amendments.An amendment to a zoning ordinance may be initiated by the governing body, the planning agency, or by petition of affected property owners as defined in the zoning ordinance. An amendment not initiated by the planning agency shall be referred to the planning agency, if there is one, for study and report and may not be acted upon by the governing body until it has received the recommendation Official Publication of the State of Minnesota Revisor of Statutes 4MINNESOTA STATUTES 2020462.357 of the planning agency on the proposed amendment or until 60 days have elapsed from the date of reference of the amendment without a report by the planning agency. Subd. 5.Amendment; certain cities of the first class.The provisions of this subdivision apply to the adoption or amendment of any portion of a zoning ordinance which changes all or part of the existing classification of a zoning district from residential to either commercial or industrial of a property located in a city of the first class, except a city of the first class in which a different process is provided through the operation of the city's home rule charter. In a city to which this subdivision applies, amendments to a zoning ordinance shall be made in conformance with this section but only after there shall have been filed in the office of the city clerk a written consent of the owners of two-thirds of the several descriptions of real estate situate within 100 feet of the total contiguous descriptions of real estate held by the same owner or any party purchasing any such contiguous property within one year preceding the request, and after the affirmative vote in favor thereof by a majority of the members of the governing body of any such city. The governing body of such city may, by a two-thirds vote of its members, after hearing, adopt a new zoning ordinance without such written consent whenever the planning commission or planning board of such city shall have made a survey of the whole area of the city or of an area of not less than 40 acres, within which the new ordinance or the amendments or alterations of the existing ordinance would take effect when adopted, and shall have considered whether the number of descriptions of real estate affected by such changes and alterations renders the obtaining of such written consent impractical, and such planning commission or planning board shall report in writing as to whether in its opinion the proposals of the governing body in any case are reasonably related to the overall needs of the community, to existing land use, or to a plan for future land use, and shall have conducted a public hearing on such proposed ordinance, changes or alterations, of which hearing published notice shall have been given in a daily newspaper of general circulation at least once each week for three successive weeks prior to such hearing, which notice shall state the time, place and purpose of such hearing, and shall have reported to the governing body of the city its findings and recommendations in writing. Subd. 6.Appeals and adjustments.Appeals to the board of appeals and adjustments may be taken by any affected person upon compliance with any reasonable conditions imposed by the zoning ordinance. The board of appeals and adjustments has the following powers with respect to the zoning ordinance: (1) To hear and decide appeals where it is alleged that there is an error in any order, requirement, decision, or determination made by an administrative officer in the enforcement of the zoning ordinance. (2) To hear requests for variances from the requirements of the zoning ordinance including restrictions placed on nonconformities. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with the ordinance. The board of appeals and adjustments or the governing body as the case may be, may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under the zoning ordinance for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or governing body as the case may be, may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one family dwelling as a two family dwelling. The board or governing body as the Official Publication of the State of Minnesota Revisor of Statutes 462.357MINNESOTA STATUTES 20205 case may be may impose conditions in the granting of variances. A condition must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. Subd. 6a.Normal residential surroundings for persons with disabilities.It is the policy of this state that persons with disabilities should not be excluded by municipal zoning ordinances or other land use regulations from the benefits of normal residential surroundings. For purposes of subdivisions 6a through 9, "person" has the meaning given in section 245A.02, subdivision 11. Subd. 7.Permitted single family use.A state licensed residential facility or a housing with services establishment registered under chapter 144D serving six or fewer persons, a licensed day care facility serving 12 or fewer persons, and a group family day care facility licensed under Minnesota Rules, parts 9502.0315 to 9502.0445 to serve 14 or fewer children shall be considered a permitted single family residential use of property for the purposes of zoning, except that a residential facility whose primary purpose is to treat juveniles who have violated criminal statutes relating to sex offenses or have been adjudicated delinquent on the basis of conduct in violation of criminal statutes relating to sex offenses shall not be considered a permitted use. Subd. 8.Permitted multifamily use.Except as otherwise provided in subdivision 7 or in any town, municipal or county zoning regulation as authorized by this subdivision, a state licensed residential facility serving from 7 through 16 persons or a licensed day care facility serving from 13 through 16 persons shall be considered a permitted multifamily residential use of property for purposes of zoning. A township, municipal or county zoning authority may require a conditional use or special use permit in order to assure proper maintenance and operation of a facility, provided that no conditions shall be imposed on the facility which are more restrictive than those imposed on other conditional uses or special uses of residential property in the same zones, unless the additional conditions are necessary to protect the health and safety of the residents of the residential facility. Nothing herein shall be construed to exclude or prohibit residential or day care facilities from single family zones if otherwise permitted by a local zoning regulation. Subd. 9.Development goals and objectives.In adopting official controls after July 1, 2008, in a municipality outside the metropolitan area, as defined by section 473.121, subdivision 2, the municipality shall consider restricting new residential, commercial, and industrial development so that the new development takes place in areas subject to the following goals and objectives: (1) minimizing the fragmentation and development of agricultural, forest, wildlife, and open space lands, including consideration of appropriate minimum lot sizes; (2) minimizing further development in sensitive shoreland areas; (3) minimizing development near wildlife management areas, scientific and natural areas, and nature centers; (4) encouraging land uses in airport safety zones that are compatible with the safe operation of the airport and the safety of people in the vicinity of the airport; (5) identification of areas of preference for higher density, including consideration of existing and necessary water and wastewater services, infrastructure, other services, and to the extent feasible, encouraging full development of areas previously zoned for nonagricultural uses; (6) encouraging development close to places of employment, shopping centers, schools, mass transit, and other public and private service centers; (7) identification of areas where other developments are appropriate; and Official Publication of the State of Minnesota Revisor of Statutes 6MINNESOTA STATUTES 2020462.357 (8) other goals and objectives a municipality may identify. History: 1965 c 670 s 7; 1969 c 259 s 1; 1973 c 123 art 5 s 7; 1973 c 379 s 4; 1973 c 539 s 1; 1973 c 559 s 1,2; 1975 c 60 s 2; 1978 c 786 s 14,15; Ex1979 c 2 s 42,43; 1981 c 356 s 248; 1982 c 490 s 2; 1982 c 507 s 22; 1984 c 617 s 6-8; 1985 c 62 s 3; 1985 c 194 s 23; 1986 c 444; 1987 c 333 s 22; 1989 c 82 s 2; 1990 c 391 art 8 s 47; 1990 c 568 art 2 s 66,67; 1994 c 473 s 3; 1995 c 224 s 95; 1997 c 113 s 20; 1997 c 200 art 4 s 5; 1997 c 202 art 4 s 11; 1997 c 216 s 138; 1999 c 96 s 3,4; 1999 c 211 s 1; 2001 c 174 s 1; 2001 c 207 s 13,14; 2002 c 366 s 6; 2004 c 258 s 2; 2005 c 56 s 1; 1Sp2005 c 1 art 1 s 92; art 2 s 146; 2007 c 140 art 12 s 14; 2008 c 297 art 1 s 60,61; 2009 c 149 s 3; 2011 c 19 s 2; 1Sp2019 c 3 art 3 s 110,111 Official Publication of the State of Minnesota Revisor of Statutes 462.357MINNESOTA STATUTES 20207 DATE: 4/7/2021 TO: Cary Teague – Planning Director FROM: Zuleyka Marquez, PE – Graduate Engineer RE: 6222 Braeburn Circle - Variance Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property and proposed project for street and utility concerns, grading, stormwater, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the request of the Planning Department; a more detailed review may be performed at the time of building permit application. Plans reviewed included the site and floor plans dated February 26, 2021. No exterior site improvements were proposed. Thus, the Engineering Department does not have concerns or guidance apart from the following: the service availability charge for the increase in occupancy may need to be revised and paid prior to building permit issuance. May 5, 2021 Cary Teague, Community Development Director David Fisher, Chief Building Official & Rick Hammerschmidt, Fire Marshall 6222 Braeburn Circle - Geneva Suites – Reasonable Accommodation Request Variance Public Hearing Information / Background: On April 14, 2021, there was a Planning Commission meeting for a public hearing for 6222 Braeburn Circle - Geneva Suites – Reasonable Accommodation Request Variance. Please reference the staff report memo dated March 30, 2021. There were a few comments and questions about a building permit that was issued. These questions included the accessibility requirements on the exterior of building and the accessible parking requirements. The permit that was issued was for R-3 single family home to remodel the basement. It came into the City’s permitting system under a residential permit. This would have 6 or fewer occupants in the building code. There was no request for a change in occupancy from an R-3 single family home 6 occupants to an I-2 institutional occupancy 10 occupants building. There was no building code analysis. After the change in use was discovered, a stop work order was issued. At this time the permit that was issued would be voided for the I-2 institutional occupancy or unit the variance is approved to add more occupant, a complete code analysis and plan review are done. While the City of Edina’s Building Inspections staff is not able to provide a comprehensive code analysis of the project, a categorized listing of several code requirements have been included in this report. The drawing set submitted for the proposed construction does not show compliance with the following Minnesota State Building Code requirements: Means of Egress The proposed floor plan has been designed in a way where the layout fails to meet minimum code requirements pertaining to safe egress. Corridors (hallways) must be continuous to the exits without open connection to other rooms of the facility. The majority of the room layout would need to be revised to meet this minimum requirement, the rooms include: the lower-level rec room, lower-level family room, upstairs kitchen, dining, great room, reception, and laundry rooms. Reference MNBC Section 407.2. The materials and construction methods of the corridors do not meet minimum code requirements. Corridors in a facility of this type shall be constructed as smoke partitions. A smoke partition provides a STAFF REPORT Page 2 higher degree of protection during a fire scenario. A clear ceiling height of 7 feet 6 inches must be achieved throughout the means of egress. Reference MNBC Section 407.3 and 1003.2. Each floor of the facility shall be provided a refuge area constructed within a smoke compartment of smoke barrier construction. This refuge area allows a safe zone for occupants on each floor as they await rescue. Each such area shall have an independent exit which allows egress without passing back into the other compartment. Reference MNBC Section 407.5. Existing stairway does not meet the minimum requirements of multiple code sections. MNBC Section 712.1.9 does not allow an open stair of the type currently proposed, a reconstruction of the staircase inside a protected stair shaft is required for minimum code compliance. The stairway configuration would also need to be modified, as current winder tread configuration would not be allowed for use in a means of egress stairway. New stairway headroom clearance of not less than 80 inches is required with the reconstruction. Reference MNBC Sections 1011.5.3 and 1011.3. Either an approved safe dispersal area or an unobstructed path to the public way at Braeburn Circle is required from all exits. Reference MNBC Section 1028.5. Means of egress lighting changes would be required. Multi-lamp luminaries are required at exterior landings which will maintain one foot candle of light in the event of a single lamp failure. An emergency electrical system is required for illumination of stairways, ramps, and exterior landings. Illuminated exit signage is required throughout the building. Reference MNBC Sections 1008.2.2, 1008.3.2 and 1013.1. Door changes are required. Means of egress doors throughout the facility must be updated to provide a clear width of 41-½ inches. This includes all sleeping room doors and any door which an occupant passes through on the way to an exit. Rear sliding doors serving kitchen area must be changed to a pivoted or side- hinged swinging type. Exterior landing at this area and all areas must be at the same elevation as the interior finished floor. Threshold height at doors shall not exceed ½ inch above finished floor. Reference MNBC Sections 1010.1.1, 1010.1.2, 1010.1.5 and 1010.1.7. Type of Construction The current type of construction V-B would not be adequate for a use of a I-2 facility. Invasive changes to the structure would be required to upgrade the fire resistance ratings of building elements to achieve the minimum construction type of V-A. Reference MNBC Table 504.4. The exterior deck area would need to achieve a 1-hour fire-resistive rating which would require difficult retrofitting. Reference MNBC Table 601. Accessibility The following accessible components are required: An accessible building entrance, an accessible route from accessible building entrance to primary function areas, Signage complying with IBC Section 1111, one eight- foot-wide accessible parking space would be required and one eight-foot-wide access isle with the required accessible signage, accessible route connecting accessible parking to accessible entrance, and at least one accessible family or assisted-use toilet room. Additional construction documents would be required for comprehensive accessibility review. Reference IEBC Section 305.4.2 including MN Amendments. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Fire Sprinkler and Fire Life Safety Systems Fire sprinkler and fire life safety systems have been addressed in previous staff reports, but it should be noted that extensive retrofitting is required throughout the facility for both sprinklers and detection components. Mechanical Mechanical systems will require invasive changes and retrofitting to accommodate the smoke control and fire-resistive changes required for the facility. Upgrades to commercially rated materials may be required. Plumbing Plumbing systems will require retrofitting to accommodate the fire-resistive changes required for the facility. Access to plumbing penetrations for required fire-stopping may be invasive. Upgrades to commercially rated materials may be required. Electrical Electrical system must comply with the provisions of Chapter 27 and NFPA 99. Upgrades to commercially rated materials may be required. Conclusion Various minimum code requirements have not been met by the proposed design. A complete code analysis for change of occupancy to an I-2 will be needed for submission for review. In the event of approval of the Reasonable Accommodation Request Variance, the above code concerns must be adequately addressed prior to permit issuance to allow for a legal and safe facility. A more comprehensive review of completed construction documents may uncover additional code concerns. March 30, 2021 Cary Teague, Community Development Director David Fisher, Chief Building Official & Rick Hammerschmidt, Fire Marshall 6222 Braeburn Circle - Geneva Suites – Reasonable Accommodation Request Variance Information / Background: 6222 Braeburn Circle is a single-family home built in 1968 and classified as an R-3. Under today’s building code, the R-3 Residential Group is a residential occupancy where the occupants are primarily permanent in nature and not classified as a R-1 (hotels), R-2 (apartments), R-4 (occupant with more than 5 occupants but not more than 16 who reside on a 24-hour basis supervised and receiving custodial care, such as an assisted living facility, group home or social rehabilitation facility) or an Institutional Group I (hospital or assisted living with more than 16 occupants). Above we have listed just a few of the examples for the R-1, R-2, R-4 and the I occupancy classifications and uses to provide some background. On April 4, 2017, a building permit was issued for an addition and main floor renovation for 6222 Braeburn Circle. This would have been reviewed under the 2015 MN State Building Code. This was reviewed as an R- Single Family home. Because it was going to be a MN State licensed facility over 4,500 square foot, it was required to be fire sprinklered with a NFPA 13-D Fire Sprinkler system. The Fire sprinkler permit was issued July 17, 2017 and final inspection was signed off on October 3, 2017. An NFPA 13-D Fire Sprinkler System is a residential only type of fire sprinkler system that uses domestic water through the water meter, does not have a fire department connection and is not required to be monitored by a listed approved monitoring company. The final building inspection for this permit was on October 3, 2017, to verify code compliance. The occupant load of the residence did not exceed six occupants. On November 30, 2020, a building permit was issued again as an R-3 residential permit to remodel, alter and install an elevator in the lower level. There was no building code analysis provided by the designer, and no change in use or occupant load change that was requested within the plans from the building permit applicant. On December 10, 2020 a stop work order was issued after a building inspector found out there was going to be a change in use by having more than six occupants. The changes from six to seven occupants is a change in use withing a care facility in the building code from R-3 to R-4 or an I-1 or I-2 occupancy classification. The stop work order was issued to resolve the miscommunication of the permit that was issued as an R-3 Occupancy classification. In addition, when the occupant load exceeds six occupants, Planning, Health, Fire and Building Departments need to review the plans and permit for code compliance. STAFF REPORT Page 2 The letter dated March 1, 2021, from the attorney for The Geneva Suites regarding 6222 Braeburn Circle provided direction to the code analysis from Andy Campbell, Design Company dated February 28, 2021. In the project narrative Mr. Campbell states his review is using the 2020 MN Building Code, 2020 MN Accessibility Code and the 2020 MN Conservation Code for Existing Buildings. It appears that he used Option 2: Work for alteration, change of occupancy or addition of all existing building shall be done in accordance with the Work Area Compliance Method given in Chapters 6 through 12 as a level alteration as work does not exceed 50% of the building area. In 2020 MN Conservation Code for Existing Buildings Chapter 5 Section 506: Change of Occupancy is subject to approval by the code official. In 2020 MN Conservation Code for Existing Buildings Chapter 10 Section 1002 Change of Occupancy specifically requires Group I-2 occupancies to comply with the International Building Code and shall not be made without the approval of the code official. This is an important point, because it does not allow Type V-B non-rated construction in an I-2 occupancy. Type V-A one hour construction would be required throughout the whole building. Mr. Campbell states there is an existing NFPA 13-R fire sprinkler system. The City only has record of NFPA 13-D fire sprinkler system. The I-2 Occupancy would require a full NFPA 13 fire sprinkler system, which is another important point. The NFPA 13 fire sprinkler system is required to fully sprinkler throughout the building including the attic. The NFPA 13 fire sprinkler system is required to be monitored by licensed monitoring company and a fire department connection is required with a fire hydrant with in so many feet 100 feet of the Fire Department connection. There is a six-inch water main in the street so this could be accomplished. The automatic sprinkler system shall comply with the MN Building and Fire Code Section 903.2.6. requirement for group I occupancies. The fire alarm and smoke detection system would be required to comply with the MN Building and Fire Code Section 907 .2.6.2.1 through 907.2.6.2.4 requirement for an I-2 occupancy. The carbon monoxide detection would be required to comply with the MN Building and Fire Code Section 915.1.2 through 915.1.6 requirement for an I-2 occupancy. Mr. Campbell did not address the corridor width, exiting requirements or the Type – V non-rated construction that would be required to change to Type – V -A One-hour construction that is required 2020 MN State Building Code. In addition to review the Mr. Campbell’s code analysis the City consulted with the Minnesota State Fire Marshal’s Division and the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry. They both agreed with the change in occupancy and the need to follow the code requirements in the 2020 MN State Building and Fire Code. Enclosed are the Quick Reference Guides to Care Facilities in Minnesota for the 2015 and 2020 State Building and Fire Code. I highlighted in yellow the housing with services facility that apply to this code review. 1 Liz Olson From:Jeff Siems Sent:Monday, April 12, 2021 7:14 AM To:Liz Olson; David Nelson Cc:Kris Aaker; Cary Teague; Emily Bodeker Subject:RE: 6222 Braeburn Circle- A request for reasonable accommodation from the permitted 6 residents to 10 residents Hi Liz, It appears that many of the calls listed are related to requests for ambulances (EMS) treatment and transportations. Given the proposed population of the variance, we can expect an increase in these types of calls should the variance be approved. From an emergency response perspective, we can handle the increased calls however, some of the photos also show a concern for congestion of vehicles in the cul-de-sac. This may limit our ability to negotiate fire apparatus, emergency vehicles and even snow plows and garbage trucks if more vehicles are introduced to the area due to an increased patient load of the occupancy. Jeff Siems, Assistant Fire Chief 952-826-0328 | Fax 952-826-0393 jsiems@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov/Fire Stay informed about the City’s response to COVID-19 at EdinaMN.gov/Coronavirus. Need a hand or want to help? Visit BetterTogetherEdina.org/COVID-19. From: Liz Olson <LKOlson@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Friday, April 9, 2021 2:30 PM To: Jeff Siems <jsiems@EdinaMN.gov>; David Nelson <DNelson@EdinaMN.gov> Cc: Kris Aaker <KAaker@EdinaMN.gov>; Cary Teague <cteague@EdinaMN.gov>; Emily Bodeker <EBodeker@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: 6222 Braeburn Circle- A request for reasonable accommodation from the permitted 6 residents to 10 residents Good afternoon, neighbor near the Geneva Suites at 6222 Braeburn Circle, emailed us with information that we passed along to Planning Commissioners. Attachments from are relevant to a variance request for reasonable accommodation from the permitted 6 residents to 10 residents at 6222 Braeburn Circle. The public hearing is on the agenda for the April 14th Planning Commission meeting. Planning is wondering if either of you have comments on the pictures or conflicts about parking on the street. Any concerns in general? Please reply all. Thanks, Liz Liz Olson, Administrative Support Specialist 952-826-0465 | Fax 952-826-0389 4801 W. 50th St. | Edina, MN 55424 LKOlson@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov/Planning Stay informed about the City’s response to COVID-19 at EdinaMN.gov/Coronavirus. Need a hand or want to help? Visit BetterTogetherEdina.org/COVID-19. 1 Liz Olson From:David Nelson Sent:Sunday, April 11, 2021 9:39 AM To:Liz Olson; Jeff Siems Cc:Kris Aaker; Cary Teague; Emily Bodeker Subject:RE: 6222 Braeburn Circle- A request for reasonable accommodation from the permitted 6 residents to 10 residents Hi Liz, Looks like the vast majority of the calls are medical related and we haven’t responded to any parking complaints for about two years. I don’t have any concerns about the parking on the street as long as the vehicles are legally parked. Increasing the number of residents will most likely increase the calls for service related to medical situations. Thanks, Dave Dave Nelson, Chief of Police 952-826-0487 | Fax 952-826-1607 DNelson@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov/Police Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to attorney-client or work product privilege, may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. From: Liz Olson <LKOlson@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Friday, April 9, 2021 2:30 PM To: Jeff Siems <jsiems@EdinaMN.gov>; David Nelson <DNelson@EdinaMN.gov> Cc: Kris Aaker <KAaker@EdinaMN.gov>; Cary Teague <cteague@EdinaMN.gov>; Emily Bodeker <EBodeker@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: 6222 Braeburn Circle- A request for reasonable accommodation from the permitted 6 residents to 10 residents Good afternoon, neighbor near the Geneva Suites at 6222 Braeburn Circle, emailed us with information that we passed along to Planning Commissioners. Attachments from are relevant to a variance request for reasonable accommodation from the permitted 6 residents to 10 residents at 6222 Braeburn Circle. The public hearing is on the agenda for the April 14th Planning Commission meeting. Planning is wondering if either of you have comments on the pictures or conflicts about parking on the street. Any concerns in general? Please reply all. Thanks, Liz Liz Olson, Administrative Support Specialist 952-826-0465 | Fax 952-826-0389 4801 W. 50th St. | Edina, MN 55424 LKOlson@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov/Planning Quick Reference Guide To Care Facilities in Minnesota 2020 Minnesota Building Code & 2020 Minnesota Fire Code DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH HUMAN DEPARTMENT s E RI I OF F E s ism DEPARTMENT OF 0 LABOR AND INDUSTRY 2020 MBC & 2020 MFC Table 1.1 Quick Reference Guide to Day Care Facilities in Minnesota See the Minnesota Building Code and the Minnesota Fire Code for verification of applicable construction requirements Type of Licensed Facility MN Rule (MR) or Statute (MS) Number of Care Recipients 2020 MSBC Occupancy Classification State Regulatory Agency When Sprinklers are Required (3) Fire Alarm & Detection Requirements (8) (as amended) Accessibility MN Rule 1341 Adult Day Care < 24 Child Care (Day Care) < 24 hours per day hours per day Family Child Care Home (4) MS 245A & Up to 10 Care Recipients with < 6 children below 5 years of age. R-3 Dwelling Unit DHS None Smoke Alarms required: IBC & IFC 907.2.10.2 Carbon Monoxide Detection required: IBC 915.1.1 Not Required MR 9502.0315 to MR 9502.0445 Group Child Care Home (4) MS 245A & 11-14 Care Recipients Dwelling R-3 Unit DHS None Smoke Alarms required: IBC & IFC 907.2.10.2 Carbon Monoxide Detection required: IBC 915.1.1 Not Required MR 9502.0315 to MR 9502.0445 Child Care Center MS 245A & More than 5 but < 100 Care Recipients < 30 months of age & each room at, and with an exit at the level of exit discharge. E DHS Fire Areas > 12,000 SF or Care Areas below level of exit discharge (1) (6) Fire Alarm & Detection required: IBC & IFC 907.2.3 Required MR 9503.0005 to MR 9503.0170 Child Care Center MS 245A & More than 5 Care Recipients greater than 30 months of age. E OHS Fire Areas > 12 000 SF or, Care Areas below level of exit discharge (1) (6) Fire Alarm & Detection required: IBC & IFC 907.2.3 Required MR 9503.0005 to MR 9503.0170 Child Care Center MS 245A & More than 5 Care Recipients < 30 months of age and less. 1-4 OHS Required (1) (9) Fire Alarm/Smoke Alarms per 907.2.6, Carbon Monoxide Detection required: IBC 915.1.1 Required MR 9503.0005 to MR 9503.0170 Adult Day Care Center/ Adult Day Services Center MS 245A & 6 or more Care Recipients, all may or may not be capable of self preservation 1-4 OHS Required (1) (9) Fire Alarm/Smoke Alarms per 907.2.6, Carbon Monoxide Detection required: IBC 915.1.1 Required MR 9555.9600 to MR 9555.9730 Adult Day Care Center/ Adult Day Services Center MS 245A & 6 or more Care Recipients but not more than 50% of the Care Recipients not capable of self preservation. See MSFC 8102 for additional requirements E DHS exit discharge (1) (6) Fire Areas > 12,000 SF or Care Areas below level of Fire Alarm & Detection required: IBC & IFC 907.2.3 Required MR 9555.9600 to MR 9555.9730 Footnotes: (8) See MR 1305.0907, MR 7511.0907 and the specific IBC/IFC Section for exceptions. (1) An NFPA 13 fire sprinkler system is required per code. (9) See IBC or IFC Section 903.2.6 for exceptions. (2) An NFPA 13, 13-R, or 13-D fire sprinkler system is required per code. (3) Refer to license for special sprinkler installation requirements Key: (4) Usually within the caregivers residence. DHS= Department of Human Services- www.dhs.state.mn.us (5) Combined area on all floors, excluding garages. MDH= Department of Health- www.health.state.mn.us (6) See MR 1306 Special Fire Protection Systems for more restrictive thresholds if adopted by DLI= Department of Labor and Industry- www.dli.mn.gov municipality SFM= State Fire Marshal- www.dps.mn.gov/divisions/sfm (7) For the purposes of these provisions, fire walls, party walls, or attached multiple fire resistant exterior walls shall only create separate buildings where providing separation from occupancies other than Group R. Additional Resources For MN Statutes or MN Rule see: www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/pubs/ For information on licensing see: www.state.mn.us/license/content.do?mode=search For a listing of licensed health care facilities see: www.health.state.mn.us/divs/fpc/directory/providerselect.cfm & HTTP://licensinglookup.dhs.state.mn.us/ For requirements for plans and specifications prepared by a MN licensed architect or engineer see: http://mn.gov/aelslagid/index.html 3/31/20 2020 MBC & 2020 MFC Table 1.2 Quick Reference Guide to Supervised Living Facilities in Minnesota See the Minnesota Building Code and the Minnesota Fire Code for verification of applicable construction requirements Type of Licensed Facility MN Rule (MR) or Statute (MS) Number of Care Recipients 2020 MSBC Occupancy Classification State Regulatory Agency When Sprinklers are Required (4) Fire Alarm & Detection Requirements (7) (as amended) Accessibility MN Rule 1341 ISupervised Living Facilities Class A-1 MS 144.50 & 6 or fewer Care Recipients- all capable of self preservation R-3 Dwelling Unit MDH DLI > 4,500 SF (3) (5) (6) Smoke alarms required: IBC 907.2.10.2; Carbon Monoxide Alarms required: IBC 915.1 NOT Required MR 4665 Class A-2 ' MS 144.50 & 7-16 Care Recipients- all capable of self preservation R-4 Condition 1 MDH MDH DLI Required (2) Smoke alarms required: IBC 907.2.10.2; Carbon Monoxide Alarms required: IBC 915.1 Required: 1 Accessible, Remainder Type B MR 4665 Also may include: Rule 36 Intensive Residential Treatment Services MR 9520.0500 DHS DLI to MR 9520.0670 Class A-2 MS 144.50 & More than 16 Care Recipients- all capable of self preservation 1-1 Condition 1 MDH DLI Required (2) Smoke alarms required: IBC 907.2.6, 907.2.10.2; Carbon Monoxide Alarms required: IBC 915.1 Required: 4% Accessible, Remainder Type B MR 4665 Also may include: Rule 26 Sexually Dangerous MR 9515.3000 1-3 DHS MDH DLI Required (1) Smoke alarms required: IBC 907.2.6 Required: 3% Accessible to MR 9515.3110 Class B-1 MS 144.50 & 6 or fewer residents- all of whom may NOT be capable of self-preservation R-3 MDH DLI Required (3) Smoke alarms required: IBC 907.2.10.2; Carbon Monoxide Alarms required: IBC 915.1 Type B Units required if > 3 Sleeping Units MR 4665 Also may include: Rule 32 Detox Service Program MR 9530.6510 OHS MDH DLI to MR 9530.6590 Class B-2 MS 144.50 & 7-16 Care Recipients- all of whom may NOT be capable of self-preservation R-4 Condition 2 MDH DLI Required (2) Smoke alarms required: IBC 907.2.10.2; Carbon Monoxide Alarms required: IBC 915.1 Required: 1 Accessible, Remainder Type B MR 4665 Class B-3 MS 144.50 & More than 16 Care Recipients- SOME of whom require limited verbal or physical assistance with self-preservation 1-1 Condition 2 MDH DLI Required (1) Smoke alarms required: IBC 907.2.6.1, 907.2.10.2; Carbon Monoxide Alarms required: IBC 915.1 Required: 4% Accessible, Remainder Type B MR 4665 More than 16 Care Recipients- all of whom may NOT be capable of self- preservation 1-2 MDH DLI Required (1) Smoke alarms required: IBC 907.2.6.2; Carbon Monoxide Alarms required: IBC 915.1 Public Areas: Req'd Patient Rooms: 50% Accessible with MDH Toilet Rooms Footnotes: (1) An NFPA 13 fire sprinkler system is required per code. (2) An NFPA 13, 13-R, or 13-D fire sprinkler system is required per code. (3) Refer to license for special sprinkler installation requirements (4) Usually within the caregivers residence. (5) Combined area on all floors, excluding garages. (6) For the purposes of these provisions, fire walls, party walls, or attached multiple fire resistant exterior walls shall only create separate buildings where providing separation from occupancies other than Group R. Additional Resources (7) See MR 1305.0907, MR 7511.0907 and the specific IBC/IFC Section for exceptions. (8) See IBC or IFC Section 903.2.6 for exceptions. Key: DHS= Department of Human Services- www.dhs.state.mn.us MDH= Department of Health- www.health.state.mn.us DLI= Department of Labor and Industry- www.dli.mn.gov SFM= State Fire Marshal- www.dps.mn.gov/divisions/sfm 3/31/20 For MN Statutes or MN Rule see: www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/pubs/ For information on licensing see: www.state.mn.us/license/content.do?mode=search For a listing of licensed health care facilities see: www.health.state.mn.us/divs/fpc/directory/providerselect.cfm & HTTP://licensinglookup.dhs.state.mn.us/ For requirements for plans and specifications prepared by a MN licensed architect or engineer see: http://mn.gov/aelslagid/index.html 2020 MBC & 2020 MFC Table 1.3 Quick Reference Guide to Hospice & Foster Care Facilities in Minnesota See the Minnesota Building Code and the Minnesota Fire Code for verification of applicable construction requirements Type of Licensed Facility MN Rule (MR) or Statute (MS) Number of Care Recipients 2020 MSBC Occupancy Classification State Regulatory Agency When Sprinklers are Required (3) Fire Alarm & Detection Requirements (8) (as amended) Accessibility MN Rule 1341 Hospice Residential Hospice Facility (6) MS 144A.75 & MR 4664 1-5 Terminally III Care Recipients R-3 MDH DLI Required (2) (7) Smoke Alarms required: IBC & IFC 907.2.10 Carbon Monoxide Detection required: IBC 915.1.1; Carbon Monoxide Alarms required: IBC 915.1 If > 3 Sleeping Units; Type B units Residential Hospice Facility (6) MS 144A.75 & MR 4664 6-12 Terminally III Care Recipients R-4 Condition 2 MDH DLI Required (2) (7) Fire Alarm/Smoke Alarms per 907.2.10, Carbon Monoxide Detection required: IBC 915.1.1; Carbon Monoxide Alarms required: IBC 915.1 (1) Accessible Unit; If > 3 Sleeping Units; Type B units Adult Foster Care Adult Foster Care Home (4) (aka Rule 203) MS 245A, MS 245D.02 & MS 245D.21- MS245D.26, MR9555.5105- 1-5 Impaired Adults -3 Dwelling Unit DHS > 4,500 SF (2) (5) (8) Smoke Alarms Required: IBC 907.2.10; Carbon Monoxide Alarms required: IBC 915.1 Not Required Community Residential Setting , Child Foster Care Foster Care (4) MS 245A & MR 2960.3000 to MR 2060.3340 1-6 Foster Children without severe disability or assisted medical technology R-3 Dwelling Unit DHS > 4,500 SF (2) (5) (8) Smoke Alarms Required: IBC 907.2.10; Carbon Monoxide Alarms required: IBC 915.1 Not Required 1-4 Foster Children with medical or special care services Footnotes: (1) An NFPA 13 or 13-R fire sprinkler system is required per code. (2) An NFPA 13, 13-R, or 13-D fire sprinkler system is required per code. (3) Refer to license for special sprinkler installation requirements (4) Usually within the caregivers residence. (5) Combined area on all floors, excluding garages. (6) If federally certified shall also meet NFPA 101 Chapters 18 & 19 as applicable. (7) IF federally certified an NFPA 13 fire sprinkler system is required. (8) For the purposes of these provisions, fire walls, party walls, or attached multiple fire resistant exterior walls shall only create separate buildings where providing separation from occupancies other than Group R. (9) See MR 1305.0907, MR 7511.0907 and the specific IBC/IFC Section for exceptions. Additional Resources Key: DHS= Department of Human Services- https://mn.gov/dhs/ MDH= Department of Health- www.health.state.mn.us DLI= Department of Labor and Industry- www.dli.mn.gov SFM= State Fire Marshal- www.dps.mn.gov/divisions/sfm 3/31/20 For MN Statutes or MN Rule see: www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/pubs/ For information on licensing see: www.state.mn.us/license/content.do?mode=search For a listing of licensed health care facilities see: www.health.state.mn.us/divs/fpc/directorv/providerselect.cfm & FITTP://licensinglookup.dhs.state.mn.us/ For requirements for plans and specifications prepared by a MN licensed architect or engineer see: http://mn.gov/aelslagid/index.html 2020 MBC & 2020 MFC Table 1.4 Quick Reference Guide to Housing with Services and Assisted Living Facilities in Minnesota See the Minnesota Building Code and the Minnesota Fire Code for verification of applicable construction requirements Type of Licensed Facility MN Rule (MR) or Statute (MS) Type Number of Care Recipients 2020 MSBC Occupancy Classification State Regulatory When Sprinklers are Required (3) Fire Alarm & Detection Requirements (8) (as amended) Accessibility MN Rule 1341 Housing with Services Facility Housing with Services Establishment MS 144D 1-5 Adult residents > 80% 55 yrs of age unless registered under 144D.025 R-3 Dwelling Unit (10) MDH > 4,500 SF (2) (4) (5) Smoke Alarms required: IBC & IFC 907.2.10.2 Carbon Monoxide Detection required: IBC 915.1.1 Not Required May Also Provide: Assisted Living Services & Dementia Care MS 144G Personal Care Services Provided by MDH Licensed Class A or F Home Care Provider Housing with Services Establishment MS 144D 6 16 Adult residents > 80% 55 yrs of age unless registered under 144D.025 R-4 Condition 1 (10) MDH Required (1) Smoke Alarms required: IBC & IFC 907.2.10.2 Carbon Monoxide Detection required: IBC 915.1.1 Required: 1 Accessible unit, Remainder: Type B May Also Provide: Assisted Living Services MS 144G R-4 Condition 2 (10) Personal Care Services Provided by MDH Licensed Class A or F Home Care Provider Housing with Services Establishment MS 144D > 16 Adult residents > 80% 55 yrs of age unless registered under 144D.025 1-1 Condition 1 (10) MDH Required (1) Smoke Alarms required: IBC & IFC 907.2.10.2 Carbon Monoxide Detection required: IBC 915.1.1 Required: 4% Accessible, Remainder: Type B May Also Provide: Assisted Living Services MS 144G 1-1 Condition 2 (10) Personal Care Services Provided by MDH Licensed Class A or F Home Care Provider Assisted Living Dementia Care MS 144G > 6 residents are not capable of self-preservation 1-2 DLI/CCLD MDH (after 8/2021) Required (1) Smoke Alarms required: IBC & IFC 907.2.10.2 Carbon Monoxide Detection required: IBC 915.1.1 Required: 4% Accessible, Remainder: Type B (1) An NFPA 13 fire sprinkler system is required. (7) (2) An NFPA 13, 13-R or 13-D fire sprinkler system is required. (3) Refer to license for special sprinkler installation requirements. (4) Usually within the care-givers residence. (8) (5) Combined area on all floors, excluding garages. (9) (6) See MR 1306 Special Fire Protection Systems for more restrictive thresholds if adopted by municipality (10) Key: DHS= Department of Human Services- www.dhs.state.mn.us MDH= Department of Health- www.health.state.mn.us For the purposes of these provisions, fire walls, party walls, or attached multiple fire resistant exterior walls shall only create separate buildings where providing separation from occupancies other than Group R. See MR 1305.0907, MR 7511.0907 and the specific IBC/IFC Section for exceptions. See IBC or IFC Section 903.2.6 for exceptions. Group R & I-1 Occupancies require ALL residents to be capable of self-preservation. DLI= Department of Labor and Industry- www.dli.mn.gov SFM= State Fire Marshal- www.dps.mn.gov/divisions/sfm Footnotes: Additional Resources For MN Statutes or MN Rule see: www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/pubs/ For information on licensing see: www.state.mn.us/license/content.do?mode=search For a listing of licensed health care facilities see: www.health.state.mn.us/divs/fpc/directory/providerselect.cfm & HTTP://licensinglookup.dhs.state.mn.us/ For requirements for plans and specifications prepared by a MN licensed architect or engineer see: http://mn.gov/aelslagid/index.html 3/31/20 2020 MBC & 2020 MFC Table 1.5 Quick Reference Guide to Boarding Care & Boarding and Lodging Facilities in Minnesota See the Minnesota Building Code and the Minnesota Fire Code for verification of applicable construction requirements Type of Licensed Facility MN Rule (MR) or Statute (MS) Number of Care Recipients 2020 MSBC Occupancy Classification State Regulatory Agency When Sprinklers are Required (3) Fire Alarm & Detection Requirements (8) (as amended) Accessibility MN Rule 1341 Boarding Care I Boarding Care Home (4) MS 144.50 & <5 Residents R-3 Dwelling Unit (9) MDH DLI Required (2) (7) Smoke Alarms required: IBC & IFC 907.2.10.2 Carbon Monoxide Detection & Alarms required: IBC 915 Not Required MR 4655 Boarding Care Home MS 144.50 & 6-16 Residents All capable of responding to an emergency situation to complete evacuation without assistance . R-4 Condition 1 (9) MDH DLI Required (1) Smoke Alarms required: IBC & IFC 907.2.10.2 Carbon Monoxide Detection & Alarms required: IBC 915 Required: 1 Accessible Unit, remainder Type B Units MR 4655 Boarding Care Home MS 144.50 & > 16 Residents All capable of responding to an emergency situation to complete evacuation without assistance 1-1 Condition 1 (9) MDH DLI Required (1) Smoke Alarms required: IBC & IFC 907.2.10.2 Carbon Monoxide Detection & Alarms required: IBC 915 (1) Accessible Unit; If> 3 Sleeping Units; Type B units MR 4655 Boarding & Lodging Boarding & Lodging MS 157 & < 16 Residents in sleeping rooms OR < 2 dwelling units R-3 (9) MDH Required (2) Smoke Alarms required: IBC & IFC 907.2.10.2 Carbon Monoxide Detection & Alarms required: IBC 915 Require: If> 3 sleeping units: All Type B Units MR 4625 Also may include Rule 36 Intensive Residential Treatment Services MR 9520.0500 DHS MDH to MR 9520.0670 Boarding & Lodging MS 157 & > 16 Residents in sleeping rooms OR > 2 Dwelling Units R-2 (9) MDH Required (1) Smoke Alarms required: IBC & IFC 907.2.10.2 Carbon Monoxide Detection & Alarms required: IBC 915 Required: Accessible Units and Type B Units per MR 1341 MR 4625 I<30 Days Boarding & Lodging MS 157 & Bed & Breakfast with > 6 guest rooms Boarding Houses with > 10 occupants R-1 MDH Required (1), (6), (7) Smoke Alarms required: IBC & IFC 907.2.10.1 Carbon Monoxide Detection & Alarms required: IBC 915 Required: Accessible Units and Type B Units per MR 1341 MR 4625 Boarding & Lodging MS 157 & Bed & Breakfast with <5 guest rooms R-3 Dwelling Unit MDH >_4,500 sq. ft. (2) (5) (6) Smoke Alarms required: IBC & IFC 907.2.10.2 Carbon Monoxide Detection & Alarms required: IBC 915 Not Required MR 4625 Boarding Houses with < 10 occupants R-3 Required (2) Require: If> 3 sleeping units: All Type B Units Footnotes: (1) An NFPA 13 or 13-R fire sprinkler system is required per code. (2) An NFPA 13, 13-R, or 13-D fire sprinkler system is required per code. (3) Refer to license for special sprinkler installation requirements (4) Usually within the caregivers residence. (5) Combined area on all floors, excluding garages. (6) For the purposes of these provisions, fire walls, party walls, or attached multiple fire resistant exterior walls shall only create separate buildings where providing separation from occupancies other than Group R. Additional Resources (7) Multi-units resort buildings, as defined in MS 157.15 and licensed by MDH, with less than 9250 sq. ft. of building area. (8) See MR 1305.0907, MR 7511.0907 and the specific IBC/IFC Section for exceptions. (9) All residents in Group I & R occupancies must be capable of self preservation without assistance. Key: DHS= Department of Human Services- www.dhs.state.mn.us MDH= Department of Health- www.health.state.mn.us DLI= Department of Labor and Industry- www.dli.mn.gov SFM= State Fire Marshal- www.dps.mn.gov/divisions/sfm 3/31/20 For MN Statutes or MN Rule see: www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/pubs/ For information on licensing see: www.state.mn.us/license/content.do?mode=search For a listing of licensed health care facilities see: www.health.state.mn.us/divs/foc/directory/providerselect.cfm & HTTP://licensinglookup.dhs.state.mn.us/ For requirements for plans and specifications prepared by a MN licensed architect or engineer see: http://mn.gov/aelslagid/index.html 2020 MBC & 2020 MFC Table 1.6 Quick Reference Guide to Senior Housing & Congregate Residence Facilities in Minnesota See the Minnesota Building Code and the Minnesota Fire Code for verification of applicable construction requirements Senior Housing I ..7.1 I of Licensed Facility MN Rule (MR) or Statute (MS) Number of Residents 2020 MSBC Occupancy Classification State Regulatory Agency When Sprinklers are Required (3) Fire Alarm & Detection Requirements (8) (as amended) Accessibility MN Rule 1341 Senior Housing (See MR 1305.0310) > 2 dwelling units AND Scoped per MN Rule 1305 R-2 None Required (1) Smoke Alarms required: IBC & IFC 907.2.10.2 Carbon Monoxide Detection required: IBC 915.1.1 Required: Accessible units and Type B units per MR 1341 amendments to IBC 1107.6.1 Senior Housing 2 dwelling units AND Scoped per MN Rule 1305 R-3 None Required (2) Smoke Alarms required: IBC & IFC 907.2.10.2 Carbon Monoxide Detection required: IBC 915.1.1 Required: If > 3 resident sleeping units; Type B units (See MR 1305.0310) 1 dwelling unit AND Scoped per MN Rule 1305 R-3 Dwelling Unit None 4,500 sq. ft. (2) (4) (5) Smoke Alarms required: IBC & IFC 907.2.10.2 Carbon Monoxide Detection required: IBC 915.1.1 Not Required Congregate Residence Congregate Residence (3) < 16 Residents R-3 None Required (2) Smoke Alarms required: IBC & IFC 907.2.10.2 Carbon Monoxide Detection required: IBC 915.1.1 Required: If> 3 resident sleeping units; Type B units Congregate Residence (3) > 16 Residents R-2 None Required (1) Smoke Alarms required: IBC & IFC 907.2.10.2 Carbon Monoxide Detection required: IBC 915.1.1 Required: Accessible units and Type B units per MR 1341 amendments to IBC 1107.6.1 Footnotes: (1) An NFPA 13 fire sprinkler system is required per code. Key: (2) An NFPA 13, 13-R, or 13-0 fire sprinkler system is required per code. DHS= Department of Human Services- www.dhs.state.mn.us (3) No "Personal Care Service" provided. MDH= Department of Health- www.health.state.mn.us (4) Combined area on all floors, excluding garages. DLI= Department of Labor and Industry- www.dli.mn.gov (5) For the purposes of these provisions, fire walls, party walls, or attached multiple fire resistant exterior walls shall only create separate buildings where providing separation from occupancies other than Group R. SFM= State Fire Marshal- www.dps.mn.gov/divisions/sfm (6) See MR 1305.0907, MR 7511.0907 and the specific IBC/IFC Section for exceptions. Additional Resources For MN Statutes or MN Rule see: www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/pubs/ For information on licensing see: www.state.mn.us/license/content.do?mode=search For a listing of licensed health care facilities see: www.health.state.mn.us/divs/fpc/directorv/providerselect.cfm & HTTP://licensinglookup.dhs.state.mn.us/ For requirements for plans and specifications prepared by a MN licensed architect or engineer see: http://mn.gov/aelslagid/index.html 3/31/20 2020 MBC & 2020 MFC Table 1.7 Quick Reference Guide to Day Services & Chemical Dependency Facilities in Minnesota See the Minnesota Building Code and the Minnesota Fire Code for verification of applicable construction requirements Type of Licensed Facility MN Rule (MR) or Statute (MS) Number of Residents 2020 MSBC Occupancy Classificatio n State Regulatory Agency When Sprinklers are Required (3) Fire Alarm & Detection Requirements (8) (as amended) Accessibility MN Rule 1341 Chemical Dependency Treatment Program Day Services Family Adult Day Services (4) MS 245A.143 < 8 impaired adults R-3 Dwelling Unit DHS > 4,500 sq. ft. (2) (5) (7) Smoke Alarms required: IBC & IFC 907.2.10.2 Carbon Monoxide Detection required: IBC 915.1.1 Not Required Day Services Facility MS 245A, Adult (9) DHS Based upon occupancy Based upon occupancy Based upon occupancy MS 245D.21 MS 245D.22, MS 245D.27 to MS 245D.29 Chemical Dependency Treatment Program- Outpatient (<24 hours) MS 245G N/A B Ambulatory Care Facility DHS DLI If > 4 care recipients; if > 1 care recipient above or below the level of exit discharge. (1) Smoke Alarms required: IBC & IFC 907.2.2.1 Required Chemical Dependency Treatment Program- Residential MS 245G <5 Care Recipients R-3 Dwelling Unit DHS > 4,500 sq. ft. (2) (5) (7) Smoke Alarms required: IBC & IFC 907.2.10.2 Carbon Monoxide Detection required: IBC 915.1.1 Not Required Chemical Dependency Treatment Program- Residential MS 245G 6-16 Residents All capable of responding157 to an emergency situation to complete evacuation R-4 Condition 1 (10) DHS Required (1) Smoke Alarms required: IBC & IFC 907.2.10.2 Carbon Monoxide Detection required: IBC 915.1.1 Required: 1- Accessible unit and remainder Type B units per MR 1341 amendments to IBC 1107.6.1 MS & MR 4625 Chemical Dependency Treatment Program- Residential MS 245G > 16 Residents (10 1-1 ) OHS Required (1) Smoke Alarms required: IBC & IFC 907.2.10.2 Carbon Monoxide Detection required: IBC 915.1.1 Required: 4% Accessible units MS 157 & MR 4625 Footnotes: (1) An NFPA 13 fire sprinkler system is required per code. (2) An NFPA 13, 13-R, or 13-D fire sprinkler system is required per code. (3) Refer to license for special sprinkler installation requirements. (4) Usually within the caregiver's residence. (5) Combined area on all floors, excluding garages. (6) See MR 1306 Special Fire Protection Systems for more restrictive thresholds if adopted by the municipality. (7) For the purposes of these provisions, fire walls, party walls, or attached multiple fire resistant exterior walls shall only create separate buildings where providing separation from occupancies other than Group R. Additional Resources (8) See MR 1305.0907, MR 7511.0907 and the specific IBC/IFC Section for exceptions. (9) Occupancy classification based on primary space available, scheduling of activities at other service sites and space requirements of all persons receiving services at the facility. (10) All care recipients capable of responding to an emergency without assistance. Key: DHS= Department of Human Services- www.dhs.state.mn.us MDH= Department of Health- www.health.state.mn.us DLI= Department of Labor and Industry- www.dli.mn.gov SFM= State Fire Marshal- www.dps.mn.gov/divisions/sfm 3/31/20 For MN Statutes or MN Rule see: www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/pubs/ For information on licensing see: www.state.mn.us/license/content.do?mode=search For a listing of licensed health care facilities see: www.health.state.mn.us/divs/fpc/directory/providerselect.cfm & HTTP://licensinglookup.dhs.state.mn.us/ For requirements for plans and specifications prepared by a MN licensed architect or engineer see: http://mn.gov/aelslagid/index.html 2020 MBC & 2020 MFC Table 1.8 Quick Reference Guide to Hospitals, Nursing Homes, Ambulatory Care Facilities & Outpatient Clinics in Minnesota See the Minnesota Building Code and the Minnesota Fire Code for verification of applicable construction requirements I Type of Licensed Facility MN Rule (MR) or Statute (MS) Number of Care Recipients 2020 MSBC Occupancy Classification State Regulatory Agency When Sprinklers are Required (3) Fire Alarm & Detection Requirements (8) (as amended) Accessibility MN Rule 1341 > 24 Hour Care Hospital (Acute Care Facility) MS 144.50 — > 5 Patients incapable of self preservation 1-2 Condition 2 MDH DLI Required (1) Smoke Alarms Required: IBC 907.2.6.2 Carbon Monoxide Detection required: IBC 915.1 Public Areas: Req'd Patient Rooms: 10% Accessible; Remainder Type B Rehab rooms: 100% Accessible MS 144.58 MS 626.557 MS 626.558 MR 4640, MR 4645 Nursing Home (Skilled Nursing Facility) MS 144A.02- > 5 Patients incapable of self preservation 1-2 Condition 1 MDH DLI Required (1) Smoke Alarms Required: IBC 907.2.6.2 Carbon Monoxide Detection required: IBC 915.1 Public Areas: Req'd Patient Rooms: 50% Accessible with MDH Toilet Rooms; Rehab rooms: 100% Accessible with MDH Toilet Rooms MS 144A.18, MS 144.651, MS 144.652 & MR 4658 < 24 hours Care Ambulatory Care Facility (Outpatient Surgical Center) MS 144.55, Persons who are rendered incapable of self-preservation by the B MDH DLI > 4 Care Recipients incapable of self preservation or > 1 Care Recipient incapable of self preservation located at other than the level of exit discharge. (1) (3) Smoke Alarms Required: IBC 907.2.2 Required MS 144.122,& Also Includes: End-Stage Renal Disease Facility (Kidney Dialysis) located at other than the level of exit discharge MR 4675 Required (1) services provided Outpatient Clinic Persons who are NOT B MDH Not Required (3) Not Required Required rendered incapable of self-preservation by the services provided Also Includes: End-Stage Renal Disease Facility (Kidney Dialysis) located at the level of exit discharge Footnotes: (1) An NFPA 13 fire sprinkler system is required per code. (2) Refer to license for special sprinkler installation requirements (3) See MR 1306 Special Fire Protection Systems for more restrictive thresholds if adopted by municipality. (4) See MR 1305.0907, MR 7511.0907 and the specific IBC/IFC Section for exceptions. Additional Resources Key: DHS= Department of Human Services- www.dhs.state.mn.us MDH= Department of Health- www.health.state.mn.us DLI= Department of Labor and Industry- www.dli.mn.gov SFM= State Fire Marshal- www.dps.mn.gov/divisionsisfm 3/31/20 For MN Statutes or MN Rule see: www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/pubs/ For information on licensing see: www.state.mn.us/license/content.do?mode=search For a listing of licensed health care facilities see: www.health.state.mn.us/divs/fpc/directory/providerselect.cfm & HTTP://licensinglookup.dhs.state.mn.us/ For requirements for plans and specifications prepared by a MN licensed architect or engineer see: http://mn.gov/aelslagid/index.html ) MINNESOTA&)E I NDUSTRY Aft Quick Reference Guide To Care Facilities in Minnesota 2015 Minnesota Building Code & 2015 Minnesota Fire Code MOOSISOTA MDH \\,, Minnesota Department of Human Services REPASTMENT at HUTH 2015 MBC & 2015 MFC Table 1.1 Quick Reference Guide to Day Care Facilities in Minnesota See the Minnesota Building Code and the Minnesota Fire Code for verification of applicable construction requirements. Type of Licensed Facility MN Rule (MR) Or Statute (MS) Number of Care Recipients 2015 MSEC Occupancy Classification State Regulatory Agency When Sprinklers Are Required (3) Fire Alarm& Detection Requirements(8) fas amended) Accessibility MN Rule 1341 IAdult Day Care I Child Care (Day Care) < 24 hours per day < 24 hours per day Family Child Care Home(4) MS 245A & 10 occupants maximum with < 6 below school age R-3 Dwelling Unit DHS > 4500 sq. ft. (2) (5) (7) Smoke alarms required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.11 Not Required MR9502.0300 to MR9502.0445 Group Child Care Home(4) MS 245A & 11-14 occupants maximum R-3 Dwelling Unit DHS > 4500 sq. ft. (2) (5)(7) Smoke alarms required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.11 Not Required MR9502.0300 to MR9502.0445 Child Care Center MS 245A & >5 but < 100 children < 2.5 yrs. of age & each room at, and with, an exit at the level of exit discharge E DHS 1 Fire Area > 12,000 sq. ft. or Care areas below level of exit discharge (1) (6) Required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.3 Required MR9503.0005 to MR9503.0170 Child Care Center MS 245A & More than 5 children > 2.5 yrs of age E DHS Fire Area > 12,000 sq. ft. or Care areas below level of exit discharge (1) (6) Required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.3 Required MR9503.0005 to MR9503.0170 Child Care Center MS 245A & More than 5 children < 2.5 yrs. of age 1-4 DHS , Required (1) (9) Required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.6.4 Required MR9503.0005 to MR9503.0170 Adult Daycare Center 1 MS 245A & 6 or more occupants, all may — or may not be capable of self- preservation 1-4 DHS Required (1) (9) 1 Required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.6.4 & IFC 8102.1.3.3 Required MR9555.9600 to MR9555.9730 Adult Daycare Center MS 245A & 6 or more occupants — but having no more than 50% of the occupants who are not capable of self-preservation See MSFC 8102 for additional requirements E DHS Fire Area > 12,000 sq. ft. or Care areas below level of exit discharge (1) (6) Required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.3 & IFC 8102.1.3.3 Required MR9555.9600 to MR9555.9730 Footnotes: (1) An NFPA 13 fire sprinkler system is required per code. (2) An NFPA 13, 13-R or 13-D fire sprinkler system is required per code. (3) Refer to license for special sprinkler installation requirements. (4) Usually within the caregivers residence. (5) Combined area on all floors, excluding garages (6) See MR 1306 Special Fire Protection Systems for more restrictive thresholds if adopted by municipality. (7) For the purposes of these provisions, fire walls, party walls, or attached multiple fire resistance exterior walls shall only create separate buildings where providing separation from occupancies other than Group R. (8) See MR 1305.0907, MR 7511.0907 and the specific IBC/IFC section for exceptions. (9) See IBC or IFC Sec. 903.2.6 for exceptions. Key: DHS = Department of Human Services — www.dhs.state.mn.us MDH = Department of Health — www.health.state.mn.us DLI = Department of Labor & Industry — www.dli.mn.gov SFM = State Fire Marshal —www.dps.mn.crov/divisions/sfm Additional Resources For MN Statute or MN Rule see: www.revisor.leq.state.mn.us/pubs/ For information on licensing see: www.state.mn.us/license/content.do?mode=search For a listing of licensed health care facilities see: www.health.state.mn.us/divs/fpc/directorv/providerselect.cfm & http://licensinqlookup.dhs.state.mn.us/ For requirements for plans and specifications prepared and certified by a MN licensed architect or engineer see: http:l/mn.aov/aelslaq/index.html April 2016 2015 MBC & 2015 MFC Table 1.2 Quick Reference Guide to Supervised Living Facilities (SLF) in Minnesota See the Minnesota Building Code and the Minnesota Fire Code for verification of applicable construction requirements. Type of Facility MN Rule (MR) Or Statute (MS) Number of Care Recipients 2015 MSBC Occupancy Classification State Regulatory Agency When Sprinklers Are Required (4) Fire Alarm & Detection Requirements(7) fas amended) Accessibility MN Rule 1341 Supervised Living Facilities Class A-1 MS 144.50 & 6 or fewer residents — all of whom are capable of self-preservation R-3 Dwelling unit MDH DLI > 4500 sq. ft. (3) (5) (6) Smoke alarms required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.11 Not Required MR 4665 Class A-2 MS 144.50 & 7 - 16 residents — all of whom are capable of self-preservation R-4 MDH DLI Required (2) Required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.10 & 907.2.11 Required: 1 Accessible, remainder Type B units MR 4665 Also may include: Rule 36 Intensive Residential Treatment Services MR9250.0500 to DHS MDH DLI MR9250.0690 Class A-2 MS 144.50 & More than 16 residents — all of whom are capable of self-preservation 1 MDH DLI Required (2) Required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.6.1 Required: 4% Accessible units, remainder Type B units MR 4665 Also may include: Rule 26 Sexually Dangerous MR9515.3000 to 1-3 MDH DHS DLI Required (1) Required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.6.3 Required: 3 % Accessible units MR9515.3110 Class B-1 MS 144.50 & 6 or fewer residents — all of whom may not be capable of self- preservation R-3 MDH DLI Required (3) Smoke alarms required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.11 Required: if > 3 resident sleeping units: Type B units MR 4665 Also may include: Rule 32 Detox Service Pro ram g MR9530.6510 to DHS MDH DLI MR9530.6590 Class B-2 MS 144.50 & 7 - 16 residents — all of whom may not be capable of self-preservation R-4 MDH DLI Required (2) Required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.10 & 907.2.11 Required: 1 Accessible, remainder Type B units MR 4665 Class B-3 MS 144.50 & More than 16 residents — all of whom may not be capable of self- preservation 1-2 MDH DLI Required (1) Required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.6.2 Required: Per MDH rule MR 4665 Footnotes: (1) An NFPA 13 fire sprinkler system is required per code. (2) A NFPA 13 or 13-R fire sprinkler system is required per code. (3) An NFPA 13, 13-R or 13-D fire sprinkler system is required per code. (4) Refer to license for special sprinkler installation requirements. (5) Combined area on all floors, excluding garages. (6) For the purposes of these provisions, fire walls, party walls, or attached multiple fire resistance exterior walls shall only create separate buildings where providing separation from occupancies other than Group R. (7) See MR 1305.0907, MR 7511.0907 and the specific IBC/IFC section for exceptions. Key: DHS = Department of Human Services — www.dhs.state.mn.us MDH = Department of Health — www.health.state.mn.us DLI = Department of Labor & Industry —www.dli.mn.clov SFM = State Fire Marshal — www.dps.mn.qov/divisions/sfm Additional Resources For MN Statute or MN Rule see: www.revisor.leq.state.mn.us/pubs/ For information on licensing see: www.state.mn.us/license/content.do?mode=search For a listing of licensed health care facilities see: www.health.state.mn.us/divs/fpc/directoiv/providerselect.cfm & http://licensinqlookup.dhs.state.mn.us/ April 2016 For requirements for plans and specifications prepared and certified by MN licensed architect or engineer see: http://mn.qov/aelslaq/index.html 2015 MBC & 2015 MFC Table 1.3 Quick Reference Guide to Hospice & Foster Care Facilities in Minnesota See the Minnesota Building Code and the Minnesota Fire Code for verification of applicable construction requirements. Type of Facility MN Rule (MR) Or Statute (MS) Number of Care Recipients 2015 MSBC Occupancy Classification State Regulatory Agency When Sprinklers Are Required (3) Fire Alarm & Detection Requirements(9) (as amended) Accessibility MN Rule 1341 Hospice Residential Hospice Facility(6) MS 144A.75 & 1 - 5 terminally ill persons R-3 MDH DLI Required (2) (7) Required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.24 Required: if > 3 sleeping units; Type B units, exception for resident bathrooms MR 4664 Residential Hospice MS 144A.75 & 6 - 12 terminally ill persons R-4 MDH DLI Required (1) (7) Required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.24 Required: 1 Accessible unit, remainder Type B units exception for resident bathrooms Facili ty(6) MR 4664 Adult I Child Foster Care I Foster Care Adult Foster Care Home(4) (a.k.a. Ru1e203) MS 245A 1 — 5 Impaired Adults R-3 Dwelling Unit DHS >4500 sq. ft. (2) (5) (8) Smoke alarms required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.11 Not Required MS2450.02 & MS2450.21 to Community Residential Setting MS245D.26 1 — 5 Impaired Adults R-3 Dwelling Unit DHS >4500 sq. ft. (2) (5) (8) Smoke alarms required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.11 Not Required MR9555.5105 to MR9555.6265 Foster Care(4) MS 245A & 1-6 Foster children w/o severe disability or assisted medical technology R-3 Dwelling Unit DHS >4500 sq. ft. (2) (5) (8) Smoke alarms required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.11 Not Required MR2960.3000 to MR2960.3340 Foster Care(4) MS 245A & 1 - 4 Foster children w/medical or special care services R-3 Dwelling Unit DHS >4500 sq. ft. (2) (5) (8) Smoke alarms required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.11 Not Required MR2960.3000 to MR2960.3340 Footnotes: (1) A NFPA 13 or 13-R fire sprinkler system is required per code. (2) An NFPA 13, 13-R or 13-D fire sprinkler system is required per code. (3) Refer to license for special sprinkler installation requirements. (4) Usually within the caregivers residence. (5) Combined area on all floors, excluding garages. (6) If federally-certified shall also meet NFPA 101 chapters 18 & 19 as applicable. (7) If federally-certified an NFPA 13 fire sprinkler system is required. (8) For the purposes of these provisions, fire walls, party walls, or attached multiple fire resistance exterior walls shall only create separate buildings where providing separation from occupancies other than Group R. (9) See MR 1305.0907, MR 7511.0907 and the specific IBC/IFC section for exceptions. Key: DHS = Department of Human Services — www.dhs.state.mn.us MDH = Department of Health — www.health.state.mn.us DLI = Department of Labor & Industry — www.dli.mn.gov SFM = State Fire Marshal — www.dos.mn.00vklivisions/sfm Additional Resources For MN Statute or MN Rule see: www.revisor.leq.state.mn.us/pubs/ For information on licensing see: www.state.mn.us/license/content.do?mode=search For a listing of licensed health care facilities see: www.health.state.mn.us/divs/fpc/directory/providerselect.cfm & http://licensinqlookup.dhs.state.mn.us/ For requirements for plans and specifications prepared and certified by MN licensed architect or engineer see: http://mn.qov/aelslaq/index.html April 2016 2015 MBC & 2015 MFC Table 1.4 Quick Reference Guide to Housing with Services Facilities including those that provide Assisted Living Services in Minnesota See the Minnesota Building Code and the Minnesota Fire Code for verification of applicable construction requirements. Type of Facility MN Rule (MR) Or Statute (MS) Number of Residents 2015 MSBC Occupancy Classification State Regulatory Agency When Sprinklers Are Required (3) Fire Alarm & Detection Requirements(6) fas amended) Accessibility MN Rule 1341 IHousing with Services Facility Housing with Services Establishment MS 144D 1 - 5 Adults residents > 80% 55 yrs of age unless registered under 144D.025 R-3 Dwelling Unit MDH >4500 sq. ft. (2) (4) (5) Smoke alarms required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.11 Not Required May also provide: MS 144G Personal Care Services Provided by MDH Licensed Class A or F Home Care Provider Assisted Living Services Housing with Services Establishment MS 144D 6-16 Adults residents > 80% 55 yrs of age unless registered under 144D.025 all capable of self- preservation R-4 MDH Required (1) Required:Required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.10 & 907.2.11 1 Accessible unit, remainder T e B yp May also provide: MS 1440 Personal Care Services Provided by MDH Licensed Class A or F Home Care Provider Assisted Living Services Housing with Services Establishment MS 144D > 16 Adults residents > 80% 55 yrs of age unless registered under 144D.025 all capable of self- preservation 1-1 MDH Required (1) Required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.6.1 Required: 4% Accessible units, remainder Type B units May also provide: MS144G Personal Care Services Provided by MDH Licensed Class A or F Home Care Provider Assisted Living Services Footnotes: (1) A NFPA 13 or 13-R fire sprinkler system is required per code. (2) An NFPA 13, 13-R or 13-D fire sprinkler system is required per code. (3) Refer to license for special sprinkler installation requirements. (4) Combined area on all floors, excluding garages. (5) For the purposes of these provisions, fire walls, party walls, or attached multiple fire resistance exterior walls shall only create separate buildings where providing separation from occupancies other than Group R. (6) See MR 1305.0907, MR 7511.0907 and the specific IBC/IFC section for exceptions. Key: DHS = Department of Human Services — www.dhs.state.mn.us MDH = Department of Health — www.health.state.mn.us DLI = Department of Labor & Industry — www.dli.mn.qov SFM = State Fire Marshal —www.dps.mn.gov/divisions/sfm Additional Resources For MN Statute or MN Rule see: www.revisor.leq.state.mn.us/pubs/ For information on licensing see: www.state.mn.usllicense/content.do?mode=search For a listing of licensed health care facilities see: www.health.state.mn.us/divs/fpc/directory/providerselect.cfm & http://licensinqlookup.dhs.state.mn.us/ For requirements for plans and specifications prepared and certified by MN licensed architect or engineer see: http://mn.qov/aelslaq/index.html April 2016 2015 MBC & 2015 MFC Table 1.5 Quick Reference Guide to Boarding Care & Boarding and Lodging Facilities in Minnesota See the Minnesota Building Code and the Minnesota Fire Code for verification of applicable construction requirements. Type of Facility MN Rule (MR) Or Statute (MS) Number of Residents 2015 MSEC Occupancy Classification State Regulatory Agency When Sprinklers Are Required (3) Fire Alarm 14 Detection Requirements ph (as amended) Accessibility MN Rule 1341 Boarding Care Boarding Care Home(4) MS 144.50 & <5 Residents R-3 Dwelling Unit MDH DLI >4500 sq. ft. (2) (5) (6) Smoke alarms required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.11 Not Required MR 4655 Boarding Care Home MS 144.50 & 6-16 Residents R-4 MDH DLI Required (1) Required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.10 & 907.2.11 Required: 1 Accessible unit, remainder Type B MR 4655 Boarding Care Home MS 144.50 & > 16 Residents 1-1 MDH DLI Required (1) Required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.6.1 Required: 4 % Accessible units, remainder Type B units MR 4655 Boarding and Lodging Boarding and Lodging MS 157 & < 16 residents in sleeping rooms Or < 2 dwelling units R-3 MDH Required (2) Smoke alarms required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.11 Required: if> 3 resident sleeping units; Type B units MR 4625 Also may include: Rule 36 Intensive Residential Treatment Services MR9250.0500 to OHS MDH MR9250.0690 Boarding and Lodging MS 157 & >16 residents in sleeping rooms Or >2 dwelling units R-2 MDH Required (1) Required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.9 & 907.2.11 Required: Accessible units and Type B units per MR 1341 amendment to IBC 1107.6.1 MR 4625 I<30 days Boarding and Lodging MS 157 & Bed & Breakfast with 6 or more guest rooms, boarding houses > 10 occupants R-1 MDH Required (1) (6) (7) Required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.8 & 907.2.11 Required: Accessible units and Type B units per MR 1341 amendment to IBC 1107.6.1 MR 4625 Boarding and Lodging MS 157 & Bed and Breakfast with 5 or fewer guest rooms, R-3 MDH Dwelling Unit Smoke > 4500 sq. ft. (2) (5) (6) alarms required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.11 Not Required MR 4625 Boarding houses with < 10 occupants R-3 Required (2) Required: if> 3 resident sleeping units; Type B units Footnotes: (1) A NFPA 13 or 13-R fire sprinkler system is required per code. (2) An NFPA 13, 13-R or 13-D fire sprinkler system is required per code. (3) Refer to license for special sprinkler installation requirements. (4) Usually within the caregivers residence. (5) Combined area on all floors, excluding garages. (6) For the purposes of these provisions, fire walls, party walls, or attached multiple fire resistance exterior walls shall only create separate buildings where providing separation from occupancies other than Group R. (7) Multiunit resort buildings, as defined in MS157.15 and licensed by MDH, with less than 9250 sq. ft. of building area. (8) See MR 1305.0907, MR 7511.0907 and the specific IBC/IFC section for exceptions. Key: DHS = Department of Human Services — www.dhs.state.mn.us MDH = Department of Health — www.health.state.mn.us DLI = Department of Labor & Industry — www.dli.mn.qov SFM = State Fire Marshal —www.dps.mn.gov/divisions/sfm Additional Resources For MN Statute or MN Rule see: www.revisor.leq.state.mn.us/pubs/ For information on licensing see: www.state.mn.us/license/content.do?mode=search For a listing of licensed health care facilities see: www.health.state.mn.us/divs/fpc/directory/providerselect.cfm & http://licensinqlookup.dhs.state.mn.us/ For requirements for plans and specifications prepared and certified by MN licensed architect or engineer see: http://mn.qov/aelslaq/index.html April 2016 2015 MBC & 2015 MFC Table 1.6 Quick Reference Guide to Senior Housing & Congregate Residence Facilities in Minnesota See the Minnesota Building Code and the Minnesota Fire Code for verification of applicable construction requirements. I Type of Facility MN Rule (MR) Or Statute (MS) Number of Residents Statute 2015 MSBC Occupancy Classification State Regulatory Agency When Sprinklers Are Fire Alarm 8. Detection Requirements(6) as amended) Accessibility MN Rule 1341 Senior Housing Senior Housing (See MR 1305.0310) Under the scope of the 2012 IBC and having more than 2 dwelling units R-2 Required (I) Required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.9 & 907.2.11 Required: Accessible units and Type B units per MR 1341 amendments to IBC 1107.6.1 Senior Housing (See MR 1305.0310) 2 dwelling units under the scope of the 2012 IBC R-3 Required (2) Smoke alarms required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.11 Required: if > 3 resident sleeping units; Type B units Senior Housing (See MR 1305.0310) 1 dwelling unit under the scope of the 2012 IBC R-3 Dwelling Unit >4500 sq. ft. (2) (4) (5) Smoke alarms required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.11 , Not Required ICongregate Residence Congregate Residence (3) < 16 R-3 Required (2) Smoke alarms required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.11 Required: if > 3 resident sleeping units; Type B units Congregate Residence (3) 17 or more R-2 Required (/) 1 Required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.9 & 907.2.11 Required: Accessible units and Type B units per MR 1341 amendments to IBC 1107.6.1 Footnotes: (1) A NFPA 13 or 13-R fire sprinkler system is required per code. (2) An NFPA 13, 13-R or 13-D fire sprinkler system is required per code. (3) No 'Personal Care Service' provided. (4) Combined area on all floors, excluding garages. (5) For the purposes of these provisions, fire walls, party walls, or attached multiple fire resistance exterior walls shall only create separate buildings where providing separation from occupancies other than Group R. (6) See MR 1305.0907, MR 7511.0907 and the specific IBC/IFC section for exceptions. Key: DHS = Department of Human Services — www.dhs.state.mn.us MDH = Department of Health — www.health.state.mn.us DLI = Department of Labor & Industry — www.dlinn.qov SFM = State Fire Marshal — www.dps.mn.qov/divisions/sfm Additional Resources For MN Statute or MN Rule see: www.revisor.leq.state.mn.us/pubs/ For information on licensing see: www.state.mn.usllicense/content.do?mode=search For a listing of licensed health care facilities see: www.health.state.mn.us/divs/fpc/directory/providerselect.cfm & http://licensinqlookup.dhs.state.mn.us/ For requirements for plans and specifications prepared and certified by MN licensed architect or engineer see: http://mn.qov/aelslaq/index.html April 2016 2015 MBC & 2015 MFC Table 1.7 Quick Reference Guide to Day Services & Chemical Dependency in Minnesota See the Minnesota Building Code and the Minnesota Fire Code for verification of applicable construction requirements. Type of Facility MN Rule (MR) Or Statute (MS) Number or Type of Residents 2015 MSBC Occupancy Classification State Regulatory Agency When Sprinklers Are Required (3) Fire Alarm & Detection Requirements(8) fas amended) Accessibility MN Rule 1341 Day Services Family Adult Day Services(4) MS 245A.143 < 8 impaired adults R-3 Dwelling Unit DHS > 4500 sq. ft. (2) (5) (7) Smoke alarms required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.11 Not Required Day Services Facility MS 245A, MS 245D.21 Adult (9) DHS Based on Occupancy Based on Occupancy Based on Occupancy MS 245D.22 MS245D.27 to MS245D29 Chemical Dependency Treatment Program Chemical Dependency Treatment Program- Outpatient (< 24 hrs.) MR9530.6405 to NA B DHS Not Required (6) Required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.2 Required MR9530.6505 Chemical Dependency Treatment Program- Residential MR9530.6405 to < 5 R-3 Dwelling Unit DHS >4500 sq. ft. (2) (5) (7) Smoke alarms required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.11 Not Required MR9530.6505 Chemical Dependency Treatment Program- Residential MS 157 & 6 —16 Residents R-4 DHS Required (1) Required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.10 & 907.2.11 Required: 1 Accessible unit, remainder Type B MR 4625 Chemical Dependency Treatment Program- Residential MS 157 & > 16 Residents 1-1 DHS Required (1) Required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.6.1 Required: 4% Accessible units, remainder Type B units MR 4625 Footnotes: (1) A NFPA 13 or 13-R fire sprinkler system is required per code. (2) An NFPA 13, 13-R or 13-D fire sprinkler system is required per code. (3) Refer to license for special sprinkler installation requirements. (4) Usually within the caregivers residence. (5) Combined area on all floors, excluding garages. (6) See MR 1306 Special Fire Protection Systems for more restrictive thresholds if adopted by municipality. (7) For the purposes of these provisions, fire walls, party walls, or attached multiple fire resistance exterior walls shall only create separate buildings where providing separation from occupancies other than Group R. (8) See MR 1305.0907, MR 7511.0907 and the specific IBC/IFC section for exceptions. (9) Occupancy classification based on primary space available, scheduling of activities at other service sites and space requirements of all persons receiving services at the facility. Key: OHS = Department of Human Services —www.dhs.state.mn.us MDH = Department of Health — www.health.state.mn.us DLI = Department of Labor & Industry — www.dli.mn.qov SFM = State Fire Marshal — www.dps.mn.qov/divisions/sfm Additional Resources For MN Statute or MN Rule see: www.revisor.leq.state.mn.us/pubs/ For information on licensing see: www.state.mn.us/license/content.do?mode=search For a listing of licensed health care facilities see: www.health.state.mn.us/divs/fpc/directory/providerselect.cfm & http://licensinqlookup.dhs.state.mn.us/ For requirements for plans and specifications prepared and certified by MN licensed architect or engineer see: http://mn.qov/aelslaq/index.html April 2016 2015 MBC & 2015 MFC Table 1.8 Quick Reference Guide to Hospitals, Nursing Homes, Ambulatory Care Facilities & Outpatient Clinics in Minnesota See the Minnesota Building Code and the Minnesota Fire Code for verification of applicable construction requirements. Type of Facility MN Rule (MR) Or Statute (MS) Number or Type of Residents 2015 MSBC Occupancy Classification State Regulatory Agency When Sprinklers Are Required (2) Fire Alarm & Detection Requirements(4) fas amended) Accessibility MN Rule 1341 >24 hour care Hospital (Acute Care Facility) MS144.50 to >5 Patients incapable of self- preservation 1-2 DLI MDH Required (1) Required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.6.2 Required: 10% Accessible units. Accessible toilet rooms not required within acute care patient rooms. MS144.58 MS 626.557 MS 626.558 MR 4640 MR 4645 Nursing Home (Skilled Nursing Facility) MS144A.02 to >5 Patients incapable of self- preservation 1-2 MDH DLI Required (/) Required: IBC& IFC Sec. 907.2.6.2 Resident sleeping and bathing rooms comply with Health Department rules. Other areas with Accessibility Code. MS144A18 MS144.651 MS 144.652 & MR 4658 <24 hour care Ambulatory Care Facility (Outpatient Surgical Center) MS 144.55 Persons who are rendered incapable of self-preservation by the services provided B MDH DLI 1 > 4 Care Recipients incapable of self-preservation or > 1 Care Recipient incapable of self-preservation located at other than the level of exit 3 (1) () discharge IBC Required: & IFC Sec. 907.2.3 Required MS 144.122 & Also includes: End-Stage Renal Disease Facility (Kidney Dialysis) located at other than the level of exit discharge MR 4675 Required (1) . Outpatient Clinic Persons who are not rendered incapable of self-preservation by the services provided B MDH Not Required. (3) Required: IBC & IFC Sec. 907.2.2 Required Also includes: End-Stage Renal Disease Facility (Kidney Dialysis) located at the level of exit discharge Footnotes: (1) An NFPA 13 fire sprinkler system is required per code. (2) Refer to license for special sprinkler installation requirements. (3) See MR 1306 Special Fire Protection Systems for more restrictive thresholds if adopted by municipality. (4) See MR 1305.0907, MR 7511.0907 and the specific IBC/IFC section for exceptions. Key: DHS = Department of Human Services — www.dhs.state.mn.us MDH = Department of Health — www.health.state.mn.us DLI = Department of Labor & Industry — www.dli.mn.qov SFM = State Fire Marshal — www.dos.mn.gov/divisions/sfm Additional Resources For MN Statute or MN Rule see: www.revisor.leq.state.mn.us/pubs/ For information on licensing see: www.state.mn.us/license/content.do?mode=search For a listing of licensed health care facilities see: www.health.state.mn.us/divs/fpc/directorv/providerselect.cfm & http://licensinqlookup.dhs.state.mn.us/ For requirements for plans and specifications prepared and certified by MN licensed architect or engineer see: http://mn.qov/aelslaq/index.html April 2016 Survey Responses 30 January 2019 - 09 May 2021 Public Hearing Comments Better Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: Variance Request for Reasonable Accommodation to Increase Resident Occupancy from 6 to 10 at 6222 Braeburn Circle, The Geneva Suites VISITORS 4 CONTRIBUTORS 1 RESPONSES 1 0 Registered 0 Unverified 1 Anonymous 0 Registered 0 Unverified 1 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 05, 2021 09:31:44 am Last Seen:May 05, 2021 09:31:44 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Ted Yoch Q2.Address 6224 Braeburn Circle Q3.Comment My name is Ted Yoch. I live at 6224 Braeburn Circle, immediately next to the proposed increase from 6 to 10 resident at 6222 Braeburn Circle group home. I am in a unique position that I‘ve owned a group home for about 15 years. The group home next door is not being run well. My group home is run very well. Mine has not had Police calls, like the one next door to me has had. There is no reason to increase their residency from 6 to 10 occupants. They don’t do a good job of taking care of residents now. There shouldn’t be any basis for a variance when they are disturbing the neighborhood and not complying with a lot of codes, laws, and blending into the neighborhood. There is another group home in Edina, not far from us, that does an excellent job. This is not one of them. I urge the city to deny this request for a variance. Thank you for your attention. -Transcribed by City Staff Edina, Hennepin, MetroGIS, Edina, Hennepin, MetroGIS | © WSB & Associates2013, © WSB & Associates 2013 6222 Braeburn March 22, 2021 1 in = 94 ft / SHEET INDEX CVR COVER SHEET / PROPOSED SITE PLAN LS1.0 LIFE SAFETY CODE PLAN A1.0 EXISTING LOWER LEVEL I DEMO PLAN A2.0 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL PLAN 42.1 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PLAN A4.0 ELEVATIONS AND SECTIONS GENEVA SUITES 6222 BRAEBURN UNCLE, EDINA, MN PERMIT DRAWINGS 2-26-21 TOILET ROOM FIXTURES LAVATORY-PLAN TOILET -SIDE WALL ACCESSORY HEIGHTS of 2 MR11012 FE. CAR. F.E. COAT HOOK OAIN STATION PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE FOLLOWING ISA SUMMARY OF THE APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES: MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE (SBC) 2020 EDITION 2015 EDITION 2015 EDITION 2015 EDITION 2014 EDITION 2018 EDITION 2020 EDITION 2020 EDITION MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE (SPC) INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE (IMC) INTERNATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE (IFGC) NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE (NEC) MINNESOTA FIRE CODE MINNESOTA ACCESSIBILITY CODE MINNESOTA ENERGY CODE CAICI1 eaq FIM MORMI 003FR POLE wer•ICIE - MEMO. MO. - MM. TRAOMMILER GAM MM. - Loll TRU -S- • SAMMY MICR 10. -0- 001E0 ute - CAS STOM1 DRAM 303 -E- 01101.4.13 MILM - CM40PETE 901.FACE H CJ •0 DISt130 IMMO. 11mIt 4.320 Sq. rt. eatettoa OMR t.440 El. Ft. COmmtt surfaces 0,0ae M. ft. Mt. tallt 340 Sq. Ft. TSTu snsrlrk w00002* ,are se,. 0210 w Lar 04,210 w. `4: FEMUR. OF 1133000VEP TO LOT 16.M 01111110 1211000 03.31403E Mom* 4,320 14. Cl. Patty tack 1,00 49. ft. Met crane MFA 6 LOT 2::1: 1131E00124E OF 044004414 10 tOT 1.55 CITY OF EDINA MAR 0 3 2021 firaeburn Circle 7.13.7• thmoo 0 oar rk. pl LEGEND PROJECT DRECTORY ARCHITECT: Andy C.:inpboil Design Company Andy Campbell 612-432-1891 andy@acdestudio.com CONTRACTOR: Schaefco Development Tim Brown 612-802-6948 Tim@schaefco.com GENERAL NOTES 1. All dimensions shall be field verified prior to construction. Do not scale drawings. 2. Perimeter dimensions are to face of concrete or ext. face of wall sheathing. 3. Interior dimensions are to face of stud. 3. Verify all existing site conditions and provide necessary adjustments for construction. 5. All structural members to be sized accordingly by structural engineer. Do not substitute structural members without engineer signoff. LIMAL DT St 121 20. 131oek 2. DR. FMAR IIILLS,Ifroasrsa County. bliltae.olt SIT/PF. (IT WORK Sc LIMITATIONS I. Mnivtas at le tsa cael iireeleoe k's. of tit: lepl ..lrestirtioe IhtooI .ol000 the lope of our servka doer Ilk inel•de *Undoing %Int )ou cm2. n 1,kb Ls A Itul Nita. flewe checl. to coot dextirEou with>our teem& 1r con0A with comp:teat 1e‘21 allkei, if meesear,.... k, make arc chiit le erareet mad at any nun ki ax, caeignetru. that you wilh to be irtelikka on to Pater Eat Keno 112,0 0 2. Aiming at 4w-Liaod,Jrrr.ale.nliry inw0ernea6nr den rece,san 6a the moNey. 1. Setting mliVey maces or serifyIng esiming eunty inah-ere :oestabRib it. morn ot propetty. 4. Showing end label:sing I:amnions static/ cosemge of Ibt lot for yoar mina Leil for he resin,. of such governmenlal apocia that nay Loo judidiction mer that teuaittireolf to serify they ore eormtly shown before rorcsvcding nigh eon:tn.:gm S. Showing ckvatior.... on the site u Aelceted linallons to yin some balk:anon of Or toroperhy of the site. We lava el. 'Ionia-NI a bendatiark for cola ase ik delenainin‘eleNations for coseentaion or this site.110 elevations shown able rely to Ike benehmuL pnAided on Ibh aunty. Nee hat heeehrrak and cheek 0 lean one otter realm shoun or the vary uteri dolour intIg mher e' evations for ma to this site or before Inionino coanructioa. • Nae thot buildiar Jamul.. coil bti!dingkedimeroiatr to the 7topetV lin., as tato roan the Mins zed ot aarw ofthebilding STANI/ARI) !WHAMS & L'ON%'RNTIONS: 40' Demote irate aunty marker. sol, unite, ealeeraile noted. AC DC ANDY CAMPBELL DESIGN COMPANY Signature theralay cony thet.pla‘ somtkatimmemort as prmamt m•or uncle 01 4124 suommet act* tmstemdaMeM Lam cf Me SIYMMIMmeta 4111 11117 '&gnahme Andrew Campbell Name g:tudy 16, 3011 49940 Regtsealion Number Architect kw/ can,bol owe, cm,Pan/ mE200,33 Suto mentapas1414 5500 012-3k,7.1 kkkkOkikkIKIOCtfn Current Issue PERMIT DRAWINGS 2-20 21 Revision History IMO 1.1.3.1Ftr Sheet Title COVER SHEET Sheet Number CVR SITE PIAN SCALE:1/32' OACIDC 2021 CITY OF EDINA MAR 0 3 2021 PLANNING DEPAATMEN MEM MOTES • NEW 1W UTI Wt' rat X OVP 130 NOES .10551,101W ODIFAYSE111•111A1C01 • PROM! 1 Wt R41.0,01114.00.1..10A541%1V MIOUCHOUT lOrial MEL awn ID LAY015 r MEC OUP 00.4110 01.5151e0 105000 JOISTS 016. OC ®NEfi =1.5 NO raLLS To Pm. WORK AREA: 2567 SF TOTAL WORK AREA: 2767 SF / 7,785 SF = 36% OF BUILDING Sri / LOWER LEVEL LIFE SAFETY PLAN SCAM 3/16. ELI WORK AREA: 200 SF accessible entrance BATH Id 1 hr RECEP11. ani P.GR000.1 IBL 1 hr 1711 m .11413111, BEI ELCF30,11 MAIN LEVEL LIFE SAFETY PLAN SCALE: 3/16. = 1-2 TYPE 5-A 27 OCC 4) -+-1 C.RE,R001 eEr 00 Lip Erl I=IE,,P,01011.5 TO REV.V1 PROJECT NARRATIVE: This code review pertains to the existing structure and proposed renovations at 6222 Braeburn Circle. This review is conducted using the 2020 Minnesota Building Code, 2020 MN Accessibility Code, 2020 Minnesota Fire Code, and the 2020 Minnesota Conservation Code for Existing Buildings (using the Work Area Compliance Method given in Chapters 6 through 12 as a Level 2 alteration as the work area does not exceed 50% of the building area.) Existing building at 6222 Braeburn Circle is type 5-B with NFP13R sprinkler system throughout. There is one above grade level and one below grade level. Current use is for housing with services facility of 6 residents, all of whom may NOT be capable of self-preservation. Proposed use is for additional 4 residents (10 total), all of whom may not be capable of self-preservation. License of facility is for Housing with Services, with staff on-duty at all hours. Type 5-B construction is not an allowed construction type for 1-2 occupancies, so the entire work area and lower level must be brought up to type 5-A construction with 1-hr protected exterior walls, bearing walls, and floor/ceiling construction. Our interpretation of the code is that this is only required in the work area and throughout the entire level where a work area exceeds 50% of the floor area (lower level). Building official to review these proposed fire-resistance ratings per 2020 MN Conservation Code section 802.6. Proposed occupancy classification is 1-2, condition 1 (308.3.1.1). Project is not considered a change in use as the existing use falls into the same category of 1-2, condition 1. Per MNCC 805.4 two exits are required in the work area. Per 805.8 Exit signs are required where applicable throughout the work area. An NFPA 13 sprinkler system is required for the proposed work area per 2020 MN Building Code (903.2.6). The building is currently sprinklered with an NFPA 13R system. 2020 MN Conservation Code section 803.2.2 provides an exception: If the building does not have sufficient municipal water supply for design of a fire sprinkler system available to the floor without installation of a new fire pump, work areas shall be protected by an automatic smoke detection system throughout all occupiable spaces other than sleeping units or individual dwelling units that activates the occupant notification system In accordance with Sections 907.4, 907.5 and 907.6 of the International Building Code. This building meets the requirement of the exception in that the building does not have sufficient municipal water supply for the design of an NFPA 13 system. As an alternate to this exception, we are proposing to extend the existing NFPA 13R system throughout the work area as an automatic smoke detection system does not seem to provide reasonable life safety for the proposed use and the extension of the existing NFPA 13R system is a reasonable upgrade to the building. A manual and automatic fire alarm system is required In Group 1-2 occupancies per MNBC [F]907.2.6.2. Per MNCC 803.4.1.3 an automatic fire alarm system is required throughout the work area. Carbon monoxide detection is required per 915.1.1 and Smoke alarms are required per 907.2.10.2 throughout the work area. An accessible route is required throughout the building per MN Accessibility Code Section 1104. Per MNBC TABLE 1107.6.1.1 (1) sleeping unit is required to be accessible; the remaining units are required to be Type B. Per MNBC TABLE 1107.6.1.3, (2) sleeping units are required to be provided with accessible communication features, including: 1.Audible and visual alarms complying with ICC A117.1; and 2.Visual notification devices to alert room occupants of a door knock or bell. Notification devices shall not be connected to visual alarm signal appliances. SYMBOL DESIGIATONS 28 —313 fr A-3 TYPE II-B ...., ... E 'EXIT' ---. ..„...= --. GENERAL BUIU)NG RECUIREkENTS PER MINNESOTA STATE BUILD/1G CODE IBC. MEINESOTA STATE BUILDING CONSERVATION CODE. OTHERS HEM ISSUE CHAPTER/ ARTICLE ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT ACTUAL REMARKS A OCCUPANCY GROUP a -HOUSFIGISTSERVICES IT BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TYPE SA C BUILDING AREA TABLE 503 $2003 SF MAX (S0 7.715 SF 0 UUIL01110 HEIC/IT TABLE 503 I STORY ABOVE GRADE I STORY ABOVE GRADE F SEPARATED USE TABLE 508.4 I W8E112E0154 l TB (EXCEPTION 10 NA G FRE RESISTANCE OF BUILDING ELEMENTS TABLE 601 STRUCTURAL FRAME I HOURS I HOURS W000 THANE CCNSTRUCDON ON CW FOIN BEARING WALL • EX TERM INCURS I HOURS WOOD STUD WALLS BEARING WALL •INTERIOR I HOURS I HOURS W031) STUD WALLS NONBEARING WALLS ANO PARTITIONS - INIEFUOR °HOURS °HOURS WOOD STUD WALLS FLOOR CONSTUCTION I HOURS I HOURS W000 BEAMS A TOISPJ ROOF CONSIUCTION I HOURS' °HOURS W000 BEAMS A JOISTS • ire probcIon oISSIMISSI members in tool consancIon shall nal be requied H EGRESS TABLE 1015.1 SINN LEVEL LI TREATMENT): 22:69SF/210 =9P (INPATIENT I2 (SLEEPING AREAS? IATSFILTO a UP STORAGE 1,119 SF/100 = IP TOTAL 22P LONER LEVEL 12 °SPAREST TREATMENT): 1,514sma= ip AREAST IS ISLEEPMG 911STI120.11P STORAGE/Kat 70211FR03= IP LOANER LEVEL TOTAL HIP J EKITACCESS TRAVEL DIST. TABLE 101E2 EMT ACCESS TRAVEL OST: 200 MAX K COMMON PATH TABLE I0032 ICOMMON PAIN OF TRAVEL 75. MAR I ACCESSIBLE ROUTE 1107.4 Eacemke 4 Tor R-2 ocaspanno an cassia* route is nd rept ed lo conned Lanes a nnizasnes wawa attesang e un is, II cannon we mem wring accesnble mt a and Al gnabbc Use rem re on en accesHble M.. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE IS PROVUED FOR COMMON SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE UNITS IN ADJACENT BUILDING AC DC ANDY CAMPBELL DESIGN COMPANY Signature I holty artly 014 ihts Oa, sp.k.atornornprot ty me a .30.nly bed supoweo .10. 1 m adAV argOtod 03. 5d toviKtho La. A OM SU. dr-10ms. 41111 /1117 1.3,1011Jre Andrew Campbell Name Malay 26.202.4 Dale Architect MeV Ca ...91C.V.V us E 101/1. S•1•13 Fenntapc4041155.1 15042,304 annoPacncsenfoccen Current Issue PERMIT DRAWINGS 2 28 21 Revision History Isenclfct Sheet Title CODE ANALYSIS Sheet Number A0.0 OACDC, 2024 DEMOLITION SYMBOL KEY EXISTING WALLS TO REMAIN BigirreABWRI EXISTING WALLS TO BE REMOVED EXISTING LOWER LEVEL/ DEMO PLAN SCALE:1/ 4' =1..0' LL- SI ALA 01.1). = = = = I II 1 L 1=1 1 1 , %_ . '-'r. < 0.0 00-0. ,-, .1: 0.0 *CV 1 1- 1 L'I=EX1311149EILI i 1 1 I - NG WALL 1 OFFICE 1 i DEN I r - 1 00 7 I CIO 01,0. I 1 01.0 00.4. EASILY ROOM I I CIO COO' I I I I STORAGE 1 EVE GIG TO' 0 . 41- -I"r:— treIII i DAM 0 055. Os ENTRY 0.0a O u u_T ELE0 WATETZPPLY JRNACE 1 MECHANICAL 10101 010®Cu' GEM° FURIUN0 WALLS, MAINTNN 4. ALONG FOUNDATION WAGS _> re DEMOStAll 100 LIFT 4,5" REC ROOM EDI 01.0 4)(1,0. UNE...JEDi i / / / / / / / / / Eli 01.0 RIM HALL 0.0 ACV voocl I OFFICE 2 01.0 BO' BATH ELI I I II II II STORAGE 2 I on j 01.0 WO' CITY OF EDINA MAR 0 3 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT AC DC ANDY CAMPBELL DESIGN COMPANY U) 0:1) E z cu CD Z (1) C (C C51 0) 0 %I W13 Signature 1 NAotry cirtlythitto pin smAue.on amp.. papa. m•crtroclereny suAtAn. a-K1 Out Ian ad* regentrod =N. tn../ Ow Ion cll..* cnInntsola *JAM e hi V Andrew Carmbett Name FebnAmy Anal Date 49946 Ttegstratal Nirnber Architect m Ar MY Vnoe.. cmlpay Wa51..15 mp.0.1 02-351. .44.1alml7.04 ucto Current Issue PERMIT DRAWINGS 2-28 21 Revision History 145.0474, Sheet Title EXISTING LOWER LEVELI DEMO PI AN Sheet Number A1.0 0000C. 2021 STORAGE 1 0.000-2 055 OSS -6 ENTRY 1 003 1 MG NEW LOT PLR BEDROOM I 1 007 1 NEW r W IC 0.0 tr NEW LV VI L 12-9' HALL NEW .E GRE 55 3,10" 13,0' NEW-EGRESS -10' 5.4. 3910' 11,0" AC DC ANDY CAMPBELL DESIGN COMPANY CONTRACTOR TO VEFUFTFURMNG DEPTH. HMO 4" CLEAR FROM FOUNDATION UNEXCAVATED i I Sheet Title PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL PLAN Sheet Number 4.-5. FINISHED HOISTWAY (HOLD) 6415' STORAGE I 017 I Signature Usk*, clay that th, RA, Nne.6c....1<r ,an as Froparl4 Ey me aurpformy supelvis/an rldlhaD an a5* regetered wchte under the cl111•Std• al1.1nomea NEW WALLS 1-1E/OSTING WALLS TO REMNN Andrew Campbell Name February 06.201s Date 49940 kogstraboo Number Architect An*ConFbet Dann C.cmpan, X.th Y. Sure 13 ninnea,410.4 %Km ..144.1.,...10 coo Current Issue PERMIT DRAWINGS 2-20 21 Revision History Date Issueff 6'.0' ADA BATH l:1*= ao OEM NEW ME WE ELECT HEA 5'.6' BEDROOM 4 GUS OE-0' NEW Lvirtii 1016 I WREYNEYi6OFFITI4GT. NEW I.VTFUI 3 BEDROOM 3 1 018 1 01.0 01.0. NEW INTRA STORAGE 2 -H CLO Btra• NEVI LVT FLR Nati° WALL OVER FIREPLACE I 002 Elf C CIG B/ MECHANICAL I oio I /RN CE CLG TM' 4, 2,4' 3,0. s HALL 0-6S0' 6'-3}5• 1 008 2,10' GIG 1T-0. NEV/LVTFVL -""411111111W 1211 GI or-o. TEG 11 LE W/ EGT HEAT GIG O E.G. NEW TEE WE ELECT HEAT — / / /• / • / / / I / / Inn I/OU WW1 BEDROOM 2 cos 1 ATER SUPPLY PROVIDE WOCO SU SING KR LIFT PROVIDER REC ROOM I 012 I CLG PIER LVTFLR CITY OF EDINA MAR 0 3 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL PLAN GAG *EV NEVI LVT PLR PLAN KEYNOTES: 1. Provide this sleeping unit with Audible and visual alarms eompNing with ICC A117.1; and Visual notification devices to alert room occupants of a door knock or bell. 2. Provide blacking in wall for future installation of grab bars at shower and toilet. 3. Provide ADA grab bars 4. All furnishings, doors, hardware, and equipment this unit lobe accessible per hill Accessibility Code Section 1002 S. All fixtures, dearances, accessories, and hardware this restroom to comply with MII Accessibility Code Section 603. At least con lavatory, one water closet and either a bathtub or shower within the unit shall comply with Sections 604 through 610. 6. Provide 1 hr rated floor/ceiling assembly this space in addition to entire work area GENERAL NOTES. • ALL NEWWALLS 2x4 STUD Yet TYPE %GYP BD BOTH SCES UNLESS NITE0 OTHERWISE Ii RR RATED) • PROVIDE 1 :IR RAPN FCR FLOORMUNG ASSEMBLY DIRCA1GROUTLOWER LEVEL WITH (2)LAYERS r TYPE C GYP BOARD FASTENED TOWCK0 JOISTS 016"0C PREFIMSHED DOORS 6 MU.WORK THROUGMCOTLONER LEVEL FAMILY ROOM I 013 I 01.0 004 /1EW LW FLO re NEW • EGRESS 6,2W 16-0' SCALE:1/4" =1,0' A2.0 OACDC2021 [ 00 10 0 51 BEDROOM n J L GARAGE hIUDROOM LAUNDRY POWDER 1 117 1 LJl KITCHEN Signature Own:W.140..0n r&P.., Nm.a...my and supernlia, and*. I on ad* roanteredarchtedundv. 1.6 ofthe Rao .1 ..14.saa 41111 5.918tue Andrew Campbell Name February as. 202t Only 49940 RegsbatIon Mabel Architect • 11E Encs s S. Dcam 13 ,nntaapcis14455.10.1 .2%40.4 BEDROOM NOTE: FIELOVERIFT FLOOR TO HOOK HEIGHTS 7.7 LIVING ROOM • DINING ROOM IIALL 1 108 I • DATIL 11021 BATH 1 104 1 \ / O SHARED BATH tot 1 BEDROOM PG GREAT ROOM 13EDROOP.1 3 1 107 I BEDROOM #4 BEDR0()1.1 05 103 I • 4. C SEW VERIICA •ATFORN LIF STORAGE 1 120 1 CITY OF EDINA MAR 0 3 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT AC DC ANDY CAMPBELL DESIGN COMPANY LLCIXJY 1 -NEW WALLS DOSING WALLS TO REMAIN Current Issue PERMIT DRAWINGS 2-20 21 Revision History Sheet Title PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PLAN Sheet Number PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PLAN A2.1 SCALE:1/4..1,V oacoc..0a PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION SCALE:1/4" L, B.0 115 0r MAIN LEVEL SU BFLocedn LOWER LEVEL B.O. JOISTS pi, 98*-111/)".. T.CL LOWERLEVEL CONC SUB 981 1' ELEVSLABA 9B- r — / — D,......• I I • I I / --1---A4------1 c—L,—,r. 1 - \ ' 1 I ii l ' . 1 1 r' I I z I I IIIII \IIII ADA BATH 016 ELEVATIONS SCALE:I/2' = / / / / i. — 1 1 is I _. im I Pm I I \ lili . di I INE ml 11 l L.111; MOW 1 KM lekWAVII 1 W2minis M I .. I I 3 0 9'11'PS' LINEN CAB. SCI-ID SURFACE FLOATNG COUNTERTOP & SINK FOLD-DOWN SHOWER SEAT CERAMIC WALL TILE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GRAB BARS FCC:I-DOWN SHOWER SEAT WALK-IN TUB CERAMIC WALL J TILE 2X8 GERING JOIST (VERIFY) A II V II I I II I I II I I I .... I I I 17 JOISTS (VERIFY) I I I I 271CTI: ITICST FLOORT Vigh's FOR FIIIAL ELEV. INSTALL II I I ..;%*--1 . I I I I I I I I I I II II II II s,sr II FINISHED HOISTWAY (HOLD) ? ANON CONC / PIT W/ GYP. NN (ALL SIDES) ;,.• • FLOOR TO BE SMOOTH AND LEVEL, CONSTRUCTED OF 4' CONC. MIN SECTION THROUGH ELEV. SHAFT Signature Lax aRca.en a report. prepred by rm.. or unctsr 4.44 vrentwor, ad [1. I an ae4y reg.. art ht...the tax cf.S....lonfuts 41 hi V Signature Andrew Campbell Name Febniani 26.202. Date 4994e Registrabco Number Architect An* Carnplad DrIgtCcenpary anE att. 1.1nwpcis MN VAN 0.354-7.1 Current Issue PERMIT DRAWINGS 2-28 21 Rev'sion History oair IsandFa. Sheet Title ELEVATIONS & SECTIONS Sheet Number A4.0 CACDC 2021 SCALE 1' =1'-0' CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY FURRING DEPTH. HOLD 4' CLEAR FROM FOUNDATION HOISTWAY WALLS MUST BE PLUMB, SQUARE, AND TURNOVER FINISHED BEFORE MIR INSTALLATION. COIRRACTOR TO PROVIDE BUCKING FOR HOISTWAY TOWER SAW CUT EXLSTING BASEMENT CONC. SLAB FOR NEW ELEV. PIT. CITY OF EDINA MAR 0 3 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMEN-I SHOWER CONTROLS GRAB BARS T.P. DISP. ADA-HEIGHT TOILET CERAMIC WALL TILE LINEN CAB. MIRROR SOLID SURFACE FLOATING COUNTERTOP & SIM( GRAB BARS ADA-HEIGHT TORE T CERAMIC WALL TILE 1111111102: --------- ----- I r1 IIIk ILII III .12:21111 I I H I I, 1 1 1 15.4o 1 1 [ - , ' • , NEW • EGRESS, / .. , s .. HEW • • . NEW / e 'NEW ,EGRESS • ''. _ SID PATCH-‘ NG _ _ N /NEW s EGRESS ' ' PAT FH i SIDING r-f --.7)11-0-- 1 11 GENERAL NOTE ALL IXTERIOR MATERIALS, FINISHES, DETAILS, ETC. TO MATCH EXISTING, U.ILO. AC DC ANDY CAMPBELL DESIGN COMPANY TITLE REVDRAWING NO.DRAWN BY SCALE ORIGINAL DATE JOB INFORMATION ARROW LIFT 1550 91ST AVE NE - SUITE 202 763-786-3234BLAINE, MN 55449 GENEVA SUITES-EDINA RF/PMA VPC SL-120: COVER PAGE 11/04/2020 110420-V02 R0 NONE PAGE 1 of 15 ARROW LIFT Business: (763) 786-3234 Toll Free: 1-888-815-4387 Fax: (763) 786-1281 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 of 15: Cover Page (Current Page) Page 2 of 15: Specifications Page 3 of 15: Lift Assembly Elevation Views Page 4 of 15: Lift Assembly Plan View Page 5 of 15: Lower Landing Door Details Page 6 of 15: Upper Landing Door Details Page 7 of 15: Hoistway Construction Elevation Views Page 8 of 15: Hoistway Construction Plan View Page 9 of 15: Electrical WBO Elevation Views Page 10 of 15: Electrical WBO Plan View Page 11 of 15: Lift Tower Electrical Termination Details Page 12 of 15: Lower Landing Door Electrical Details Page 13 of 15: Upper Landing Door Electrical Details Page 14 of 15: Disconnect Wiring Diagram Page 15 of 15: Static Loading Table Reviewed By (please print):_________________ Date:_________________ Signature:_________________ Approved: Approved as Noted: Signature indicates that you have reviewed all attached pages and acknowledge responsibility for Work By Others and for the equipment configuration. Drawings are for fabrication purposes and may not be indicative of exact site layout. Equipment will not be released for manufacturing until signed drawings are returned to Arrow Lift. Projected Dates are used for Arrow Lift and manufacturing scheduling purposes. Projected Site Ready for Lift Date:___________________ Projected Electrical Rough-In Completion Date:___________________ Verify Floor to Floor Measurement:___________________ TRADE NOTES BY COLOR Red: Electrical Magenta: Low Voltage Blue: Framing/General Construction Green: Structural/Loading Project Manager Jeremy Kness Direct: (218) 464-3179 Jeremy.Kness@Arrow-Lift.com TITLE REVDRAWING NO.DRAWN BY SCALE ORIGINAL DATE JOB INFORMATION ARROW LIFT 1550 91ST AVE NE - SUITE 202 763-786-3234BLAINE, MN 55449 GENEVA SUITES-EDINA RF/PMA VPC SL-120: SPECIFICATIONS 11/04/2020 110420-V02 R0 NONE 2 of 15 PAGEREAD AND INITIAL: I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE CONTENT OF THIS PAGE. X_______ ELECTRICAL DATA POWER SUPPLY VOLTAGE AMPERAGE PHASE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS DRIVE:LANDINGS SERVICED: EXIT CONFIGURATION: LOWER ENTRY: MID ENTRY: INTERLOCKS: TRAVEL:TOTAL ELEVATION CHANGE: UPPER ENTRY: STANDARD FEATURES 1 PHASE UPPER:MID:LOWER: CALLS:UPPER:MID:LOWER: TOWER LOCATION: CLEAR FLOOR SIZE: INDOOR/OUTDOOR: COLOR: OTHER OPTIONAL EQUIPMENT: WITH NON-SLIP SURFACE CAPACITY: 750 LBS. SPEED: LED DIAGNOSTICR/CS TOP CAP SWITCH ETL LISTED CONTROLLER PLATFORM WITH NON-SLIP SURFACE ACME SCREW, ACCELERATED INDOOR LEFT HAND 2 PIT 3"118"121" IVORY 36" X 60" ENTER/EXIT SAME SIDE RIGHT HAND LANDING GATE STD SURFACE MOUNT N/A N/A N/A RIGHT HAND LANDING GATE STD SURFACE MOUNT 115 UPPER & LOWER: CHANNEL SILL PLATES, 2) OVERHEAD OPEARTORS, PHONE WIRE ONLY, SLIMLINE PHONE, PIT SWITCH, STANDBY POWER PACKAGE 20 FPM ILLUMINATED EMERGENCY STOP WITH ALARM TOP MOUNTED MOTOR AND CONTROLLER MANUAL LOWERING WRENCH 1 1/4" ROUND GRAB RAIL 20 AMP READ AND INITIAL: I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE CONTENT OF THIS PAGE. X_______ TITLE REVDRAWING NO.DRAWN BY SCALE ORIGINAL DATE JOB INFORMATION ARROW LIFT 1550 91ST AVE NE - SUITE 202 763-786-3234BLAINE, MN 55449 GENEVA SUITES-EDINA RF/PMA VPC SL-120: ASSEMBLY ELEVATION VIEW 11/04/2020 110420-V02 R0 NONE PAGE 3 of 15 UPPER & LOWER GATES NOT SHOWN 212" RUN CLR53" FINISHED HOISTWAY (HOLD) 5012" EQUIPMENT145" MAIN TOWER12312" MAIN ANCHOR POINT10212" ALTERNATIVE ANCHOR POINTFRONT VIEW UPPER LANDING 3618" MAIN TOWER 121" ELEVATION CHANGE(FROM BASE ANCHORING SURFACE)212" RUN CLR 6114" EQUIPMENT SIDE VIEW 6412" FINISHED HOISTWAY (HOLD) 34" RUN CLR 42"SIDE WALL3" PITCHANNEL SILL PLATE3 4"OPERATOR 8714" LOWER GATE(87 12" FINISHED OPENING)CHANNEL SILL PLATE 34"OPERATOR 8714" UPPER GATE(87 12" FINISHED OPENING)AUTO OF F O P E N AUTO OF F O P E N3034"UP DOWN PUSH TO STOPPULL TO RUN EMERGENCY STOP CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1.FLOOR TO BE SMOOTH AND LEVEL; CONSTRUCTED OF 4 CONCRETE MINIMUM, WITH 3200 PSIMINIMUM LOAD.2.IF THE CONVEYANCE IS INSTALLED WITHIN A PIT AND IS IN AN OUTDOOR APPLICATION, THE PIT MUST BE PROVIDED WITH AN ADEQUATE DRAIN. 3.HOISTWAY WALLS MUST BE PLUMB, SQUARE, AND TURNOVER FINISHED BEFORE UNIT INSTALLATION. 4.UPPER AND LOWER DOORS OR GATES MUST BE INSTALLED FLUSH TO THE INTERIOR OF THE HOISTWAY. 5.80 INCH MINIMUM HEAD CLEARANCE IS REQUIRED THROUGHOUT TRAVEL. 6.HOISTWAY LIGHTING IS PROVIDED BY OTHERS. 5FTC REQUIRED ON THE PLATFORM SURFACE THROUGHOUT TRAVEL. AN AUXILIARY LIGHT CONSISTING OF NO FEWER THAN 2 LAMPS PRODUCING .2FT CON THE FLOOR AND CONTROLS FOR NOT LESS THAN 4 HOURS, AND ACTIVATED AUTOMATICALLY IN THE EVENT OF A POWER OUTAGE.7.MAIN TOWER MUST BE FASTENED TO THE WALL AND FLOOR WITH ANCHORS SUITABLE TO THESITE CONDITIONS, AND CAPABLE TO WITHSTAND THE FORCES PLACED UPON THEM. 8.ALL BLOCKING IS PROVIDED BY OTHERS. 9.THE DISCONNECT (PROVIDED BY OTHERS) SHALL BE A LISTED DEVICE CONFORMING TO NFPA 70 / NEC 620.51 AND SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN SIGHT OF THE MOTOR CONTROLLER. THE DISCONNECTING MEANS SHALL BE EXTERNALLY OPERABLE, HAVE PERMANENT MEANS OF LOCKING THE DEVICE IN THE OPEN POSITION, AND BE LABELED WITH THE LOCATION OF THE SUPPLY SIDE OVERCURRENT PROTECTION MEANS. TITLE REVDRAWING NO.DRAWN BY SCALE ORIGINAL DATE JOB INFORMATION ARROW LIFT 1550 91ST AVE NE - SUITE 202 763-786-3234BLAINE, MN 55449 GENEVA SUITES-EDINA RF/PMA VPC SL-120: ASSEMBLY PLAN VIEW 11/04/2020 110420-V02 R0 NONE PAGE 4 of 15 READ AND INITIAL: I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE CONTENT OF THIS PAGE. X_______MAIN TOWER53" FINISHED HOISTWAY (HOLD) PLAN VIEW 36" CLEAR GRAB RAIL℄3112" 38" OUTSIDE 6114" OUTSIDEC.O.P. WITHSTOP & ALARMBLOCKING BY OTHERS6412" FINISHED HOISTWAY(HOLD)PLATFORMCENTER60" CLEARUPPER & LOWER LANDINGS BLOCKING BY OTHERS BLOCKING BY OTHERS 212"212"43" GATE (43 14" FINISHED OPENING) 3112" GATE ℄ 357 8" clr OPERATOR39"MAIN TOWER & BASECONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1.FLOOR TO BE SMOOTH AND LEVEL; CONSTRUCTED OF 4 CONCRETE MINIMUM, WITH 3200 PSI MINIMUM LOAD. 2.IF THE CONVEYANCE IS INSTALLED WITHIN A PIT AND IS IN AN OUTDOOR APPLICATION, THE PIT MUST BE PROVIDED WITH AN ADEQUATE DRAIN. 3.HOISTWAY WALLS MUST BE PLUMB, SQUARE, AND TURNOVER FINISHED BEFORE UNIT INSTALLATION. 4.UPPER AND LOWER DOORS OR GATES MUST BE INSTALLED FLUSH TO THE INTERIOR OF THE HOISTWAY. 5.80 INCH MINIMUM HEAD CLEARANCE IS REQUIRED THROUGHOUT TRAVEL. 6.HOISTWAY LIGHTING IS PROVIDED BY OTHERS. 5FTC REQUIRED ON THE PLATFORM SURFACE THROUGHOUT TRAVEL. AN AUXILIARY LIGHT CONSISTING OF NO FEWER THAN 2 LAMPS PRODUCING .2FT CON THE FLOOR AND CONTROLS FOR NOT LESS THAN 4 HOURS, AND ACTIVATED AUTOMATICALLY IN THE EVENT OF A POWER OUTAGE. 7.MAIN TOWER MUST BE FASTENED TO THE WALL AND FLOOR WITH ANCHORS SUITABLE TO THE SITE CONDITIONS, AND CAPABLE TO WITHSTAND THE FORCES PLACED UPON THEM. 8.ALL BLOCKING IS PROVIDED BY OTHERS. 9.THE DISCONNECT (PROVIDED BY OTHERS) SHALL BE A LISTED DEVICE CONFORMING TO NFPA 70 / NEC 620.51 AND SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN SIGHT OF THE MOTOR CONTROLLER. THE DISCONNECTING MEANS SHALL BE EXTERNALLY OPERABLE, HAVE PERMANENT MEANS OF LOCKING THE DEVICE IN THE OPEN POSITION, AND BE LABELED WITH THE LOCATION OF THE SUPPLY SIDE OVERCURRENT PROTECTION MEANS. PAGE TITLE REVDRAWING NO.DRAWN BY SCALE ORIGINAL DATE JOB INFORMATION ARROW LIFT 1550 91ST AVE NE - SUITE 202 763-786-3234BLAINE, MN 55449 GENEVA SUITES-EDINA RF/PMA VPC SL-120: LOWER LANDING DOOR DETAIL 11/04/2020 110420-V02 R0 NONE 5 of 15 READ AND INITIAL: I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE CONTENT OF THIS PAGE. X_______ 43" GATE (43 14" FINISHED OPENING)8612" TOP SILL381316" SWING PORTION 80" GATE OPENING7914"SWING PORTION112"OPERATOR 8714"(87 1/2" FINISHED OPENING)LOWER LANDING GATE87316"AUTO O FF OP EN 37516"4134"58"CHANNEL SILL PLATE 34"OPERATOR LOWER LANDING FLOOR LINE WIRE OUT STRIKE POST 2512"25 58" TITLE REVDRAWING NO.DRAWN BY SCALE ORIGINAL DATE JOB INFORMATION ARROW LIFT 1550 91ST AVE NE - SUITE 202 763-786-3234BLAINE, MN 55449 GENEVA SUITES-EDINA RF/PMA VPC SL-120: UPPER LANDING DOOR DETAIL 11/04/2020 110420-V02 R0 NONE PAGE 6 of 15 READ AND INITIAL: I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE CONTENT OF THIS PAGE. X_______ 43" GATE (43 14" FINISHED OPENING)8612" TOP SILL3813 16" SWING PORTION 80" GATE OPENING7914"SWING PORTION112"OPERATOR 8714"(87 1/2" FINISHED OPENING)UPPER LANDING GATE87316"AUTO O FF O PE N 37516"4134"58"CHANNEL SILL PLATE 34"OPERATOR LOWER LANDING FLOOR LINE WIRE OUT STRIKE POST 2512"25 58" TITLE REVDRAWING NO.DRAWN BY SCALE ORIGINAL DATE JOB INFORMATION ARROW LIFT 1550 91ST AVE NE - SUITE 202 763-786-3234BLAINE, MN 55449 GENEVA SUITES-EDINA RF/PMA VPC SL-120: HOISTWAY CONSTRUCTION ELEVATION VIEW 11/04/2020 110420-V02 R0 NONE A.PROVIDE STRUCTURAL TIE-BACK BLOCKING AT 123 12" ABOVE FINISHED PIT FLOOR. AA. ALTERNATE TIE-BACK BLOCKING LOCATION AT 102 12" ABOVE FINISHED PIT FLOOR. STRUCTURAL: BLOCKING MUST SUPPORT TIE-BACK LOAD OF 1,000 LBS (SAFETY FACTOR INCLUDED).STRUCTURAL: BLOCKING MUST SUPPORT TIE-BACK LOAD OF 1,000 LBS (SAFETY FACTOR INCLUDED). B.PROVIDE 3" PIT WITH SUPPORTING SLAB. STRUCTURAL: PIT SLAB MUST CONSIST OF MINIMUM 4" THICK 3200 PSI CONCRETE UNLESS ENGINEERED SLAB IS PROVIDED BY OTHERS. C.PROVIDE STRUCTURAL HOISTING POINT FOR INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT AT TOP OF SHAFT. MAY BE REMOVABLE AFTER INSTALLATION. STRUCTURAL: HOIST POINT MUST SUPPORT TEMPORARY LOAD OF UP TO 2,000 LBS (SAFETY FACTOR INCLUDED). WORK BY OTHERS C A C READ AND INITIAL: I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE CONTENT OF THIS PAGE. X_______ PAGE 7 of 15 UPPER & LOWER GATES NOT SHOWN 53" FINISHED HOISTWAY (HOLD)12312" MAIN ANCHOR POINT10212" ALTERNATIVE ANCHOR POINTFRONT VIEW UPPER LANDING 121" ELEVATION CHANGE(FROM BASE ANCHORING SURFACE)SIDE VIEW 6412" FINISHED HOISTWAY (HOLD)3" PITCHANNEL SILL PLATE3 4"8714" LOWER GATE(87 12" FINISHED OPENING)CHANNEL SILL PLATE 34"8714" UPPER GATE(87 12" FINISHED OPENING)AUTO O F F O P E N AUTO OFF O P E N3034"AA B B TITLE REVDRAWING NO.DRAWN BY SCALE ORIGINAL DATE JOB INFORMATION ARROW LIFT 1550 91ST AVE NE - SUITE 202 763-786-3234BLAINE, MN 55449 GENEVA SUITES-EDINA RF/PMA VPC SL-120: HOISTWAY CONSTRUCTION PLAN VIEW 11/04/2020 110420-V02 R0 NONE PAGE 8 of 15 A A.PROVIDE STRUCTURAL TIE-BACK BLOCKING AT 123 12" ABOVE FINISHED PIT FLOOR. AA. ALTERNATE TIE-BACK BLOCKING LOCATION AT 102 12" ABOVE FINISHED PIT FLOOR. STRUCTURAL: BLOCKING MUST SUPPORT TIE-BACK LOAD OF 1,000 LBS (SAFETY FACTOR INCLUDED).STRUCTURAL: BLOCKING MUST SUPPORT TIE-BACK LOAD OF 1,000 LBS (SAFETY FACTOR INCLUDED). B.PROVIDE 3" PIT WITH SUPPORTING SLAB. STRUCTURAL: PIT SLAB MUST CONSIST OF MINIMUM 4" THICK 3200 PSI CONCRETE UNLESS ENGINEERED SLAB IS PROVIDED BY OTHERS. C.PROVIDE STRUCTURAL HOISTING POINT FOR INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT AT TOP OF SHAFT. MAY BE REMOVABLE AFTER INSTALLATION. STRUCTURAL: HOIST POINT MUST SUPPORT TEMPORARY LOAD OF UP TO 2,000 LBS (SAFETY FACTOR INCLUDED). WORK BY OTHERS B READ AND INITIAL: I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE CONTENT OF THIS PAGE. X_______ 53" FINISHED HOISTWAY (HOLD) PLAN VIEW BLOCKING BY OTHERS6412" FINISHED HOISTWAY(HOLD)UPPER & LOWER LANDINGS BLOCKING BY OTHERS BLOCKING BY OTHERS 43" GATE (43 14" FINISHED OPENING) OPERATOR TITLE REVDRAWING NO.DRAWN BY SCALE ORIGINAL DATE JOB INFORMATION ARROW LIFT 1550 91ST AVE NE - SUITE 202 763-786-3234BLAINE, MN 55449 GENEVA SUITES-EDINA RF/PMA VPC SL-120: ELECTRICAL WBO ELEVATION VIEW 11/04/2020 110420-V02 R0 NONE PAGE 9 of 15 WORK BY OTHERS 36" A.F.F.6434" A.F.F.ONOFF SIEMENS120 VAC 30 AMP FEED FROM PANEL H I G J F K A.SUPPLY OVERHEAD LIGHT IN SHAFT & AT EACH LANDING TO PROVIDE 5 FT-CANDLES AT PLATFORM AND ALL LANDINGS THROUGHOUT LIFT TRAVEL (MOTION DETECTOR OR 24x7 REQUIRED- NOT SWITCHED) (SEPARATE CIRCUIT). B.SUPPLY EMERGENCY LIGHT (2 HEAD FIXTURE) WITH 4 HOUR BACKUP BATTERY TO PROVIDE 0.2 FT-CANDLES AT CONTROL IN EVENT OF MAIN LIGHTING FAILURE. C.SUPPLY 34" FLEX CONDUIT TO STRIKE SIDE OF LANDING DOORS (ALL LEVELS). TERMINATE 26" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AND FLUSH WITH INSIDE FRAMING IN SHAFT. RETURNS TO HOISTWAY JUNCTION BOX (SEE NOTE F). D.SUPPLY 12" EMT OR FLEX CONDUIT TO LANDING HALL STATION JUNCTION BOX (SEE NOTE E). RETURNS TO HOISTWAY JUNCTION BOX (SEE NOTE E.SUPPLY 4x4 1900 BOX AT EACH LANDING WITH SINGLE GANG MUDRING. MOUNT 36-42" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR. LOCATE WHERE ADAA COMPLIANT CLEAR FLOOR SPACE OF 48" x 30" CAN BE LOCATED CLEAR OF RAMPS, WALLS, & DOOR SWINGS (SEE ELECTRICAL WBO PLAN VIEW). CONNECT TO HOISTWAY JUNCTION BOX (SEE NOTE F) VIA 12" EMT OR FLEX (SEE NOTE D). F. SUPPLY 4x4 1900 BOX 54" ABOVE PIT FLOOR TO TOP OF BOX. SERVES AS HOISTWAY JUNCTION BOX FOR SIGNAL TERMINATION AT TOWER. G.SUPPLY 4x4 1900 BOX 30" ABOVE PIT FLOOR TO TOP OF BOX. SERVES AS HOISTWAY MAINLINE JUNCTION BOX FOR POWER TERMINATION AT TOWER. H.SUPPLY SIEMENS TYPE GF221N FUSED BLADED DISCONNECT OR EQUIVALENT (SEE ARROW LIFT FOR EQUIVALENT SQUARE D PART NUMBERS). LOCATE CLEAR OF HAZARDS & WITHIN SIGHT OF LIFT TOWER. REQUIRES MINIMUM 30" CLEAR WIDTH x 36" CLEAR DEPTH. PROVIDE ONE 30A FEED FROM PANEL TO FUSE #1. FUSE #2 USES BATTERY SWITCH LOOP. SEE PAGE 14 FOR WIRING DIAGRAM. I.PROVIDE TWO 14AWG WIRES FROM FUSE #2 IN DISCONNECT TO HOISTWAY MAINLINE JUNCTION BOX FOR BATTERY SWITCH LOOP. SEE WIRING DIAGRAM ON PAGE 14. J.PROVIDE 20 AMP FEED FROM FUSE #1 IN DISCONNECT TO HOISTWAY MAINLINE JUNCTION BOX FOR MAIN POWER (12-2 CIRCUIT). SEE WIRING DIAGRAM ON PAGE 14. K.PROVIDE LIVE DEDICATED PHONE LINE TO HOISTWAY JUNCTION BOX. (SEE NOTE F). READ AND INITIAL: I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE CONTENT OF THIS PAGE. X_______ UPPER & LOWER GATES NOT SHOWN FRONT VIEW UPPER LANDING SIDE VIEW AUTO O F F O P E N AUTO OFF O P E N L A EL B L A EL B C C E D E D TITLE REVDRAWING NO.DRAWN BY SCALE ORIGINAL DATE JOB INFORMATION ARROW LIFT 1550 91ST AVE NE - SUITE 202 763-786-3234BLAINE, MN 55449 GENEVA SUITES-EDINA RF/PMA VPC SL-120: ELECTRICAL WBO PLAN VIEW 11/04/2020 110420-V02 R0 NONE PAGE 10 of 15 G F I J 120 VAC H K D E EL B WORK BY OTHERS A.SUPPLY OVERHEAD LIGHT IN SHAFT & AT EACH LANDING TO PROVIDE 5 FT-CANDLES AT PLATFORM AND ALL LANDINGS THROUGHOUT LIFT TRAVEL (MOTION DETECTOR OR 24x7 REQUIRED- NOT SWITCHED) (SEPARATE CIRCUIT). B.SUPPLY EMERGENCY LIGHT (2 HEAD FIXTURE) WITH 4 HOUR BACKUP BATTERY TO PROVIDE 0.2 FT-CANDLES AT CONTROL IN EVENT OF MAIN LIGHTING FAILURE. C.SUPPLY 34" FLEX CONDUIT TO STRIKE SIDE OF LANDING DOORS (ALL LEVELS). TERMINATE 26" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AND FLUSH WITH INSIDE FRAMING IN SHAFT. RETURNS TO HOISTWAY JUNCTION BOX (SEE NOTE F). D.SUPPLY 12" EMT OR FLEX CONDUIT TO LANDING HALL STATION JUNCTION BOX (SEE NOTE E). RETURNS TO HOISTWAY JUNCTION BOX (SEE NOTE F). E.SUPPLY 4x4 1900 BOX AT EACH LANDING WITH SINGLE GANG MUDRING. MOUNT 36-42" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR. LOCATE WHERE ADAA COMPLIANT CLEAR FLOOR SPACE OF 48" x 30" CAN BE LOCATED CLEAR OF RAMPS, WALLS, & DOOR SWINGS (SEE ELECTRICAL WBO PLAN VIEW). CONNECT TO HOISTWAY JUNCTION BOX (SEE NOTE F) VIA 12" EMT OR FLEX (SEE NOTE D). F. SUPPLY 4x4 1900 BOX 54" ABOVE PIT FLOOR TO TOP OF BOX. SERVES AS HOISTWAY JUNCTION BOX FOR SIGNAL TERMINATION AT TOWER. G.SUPPLY 4x4 1900 BOX 30" ABOVE PIT FLOOR TO TOP OF BOX. SERVES AS HOISTWAY MAINLINE JUNCTION BOX FOR POWER TERMINATION AT TOWER. H.SUPPLY SIEMENS TYPE GF221N FUSED BLADED DISCONNECT OR EQUIVALENT (SEE ARROW LIFT FOR EQUIVALENT SQUARE D PART NUMBERS). LOCATE CLEAR OF HAZARDS & WITHIN SIGHT OF LIFT TOWER. REQUIRES MINIMUM 30" CLEAR DEPTH x 36" CLEAR DEPTH. PROVIDE ONE 30A FEED FROM PANEL TO FUSE #1. FUSE #2 USES BATTERY SWITCH LOOP. SEE PAGE 14 FOR WIRING DIAGRAM. I.PROVIDE TWO 14AWG WIRES FROM FUSE #2 IN DISCONNECT TO HOISTWAY MAINLINE JUNCTION BOX FOR BATTERY SWITCH LOOP. SEE WIRING DIAGRAM ON PAGE 14. J.PROVIDE 20 AMP FEED FROM FUSE #1 IN DISCONNECT TO HOISTWAY MAINLINE JUNCTION BOX FOR MAIN POWER (12-2 CIRCUIT). SEE WIRING DIAGRAM ON PAGE 14. K.PROVIDE LIVE DEDICATED PHONE LINE TO HOISTWAY JUNCTION BOX. (SEE NOTE F). READ AND INITIAL: I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE CONTENT OF THIS PAGE. X_______ PLAN VIEW UPPER & LOWER LANDINGS L A L A TITLE REVDRAWING NO.DRAWN BY SCALE ORIGINAL DATE JOB INFORMATION ARROW LIFT 1550 91ST AVE NE - SUITE 202 763-786-3234BLAINE, MN 55449 GENEVA SUITES-EDINA RF/PMA VPC SL-120: LIFT TOWER TERMINATION DETAIL 11/04/2020 110420-V02 R0 NONE PAGE 11 of 15 WORK BY OTHERS F. SUPPLY 4x4 1900 BOX 54" ABOVE PIT FLOOR TO TOP OF BOX. SERVES AS HOISTWAY JUNCTION BOX FOR SIGNAL TERMINATION AT TOWER. G.SUPPLY 4x4 1900 BOX 30" ABOVE PIT FLOOR TO TOP OF BOX. SERVES AS HOISTWAY MAINLINE JUNCTION BOX FOR POWER TERMINATION AT TOWER. I.PROVIDE TWO 14AWG WIRES FROM FUSE #2 IN DISCONNECT TO HOISTWAY MAINLINE JUNCTION BOX FOR BATTERY SWITCH LOOP. SEE WIRING DIAGRAM ON PAGE 14. J. PROVIDE 30 AMP FEED FROM FUSE #1 IN DISCONNECT TO HOISTWAY MAINLINE JUNCTION BOX FOR MAIN POWER (10-2 CIRCUIT). SEE WIRING DIAGRAM ON PAGE 14. F GI J LOWER DOOR OPENING READ AND INITIAL: I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE CONTENT OF THIS PAGE. X_______ 3618" MAIN TOWER 145" MAIN TOWERF G 10"54"30"TOWER ℄ SEE PLAN VIEW FOR TOWER ℄ I J TITLE REVDRAWING NO.DRAWN BY SCALE ORIGINAL DATE JOB INFORMATION ARROW LIFT 1550 91ST AVE NE - SUITE 202 763-786-3234BLAINE, MN 55449 GENEVA SUITES-EDINA RF/PMA VPC SL-120: LOWER LANDING DOOR WBO DETAILS 11/04/2020 110420-V02 R0 NONE PAGE 12 of 15 L A L A C WORK BY OTHERS A.SUPPLY OVERHEAD LIGHT IN SHAFT & AT EACH LANDING TO PROVIDE 5 FT-CANDLES AT PLATFORM AND ALL LANDINGS THROUGHOUT LIFT TRAVEL (MOTION DETECTOR OR 24x7 REQUIRED- NOT SWITCHED) (SEPARATE CIRCUIT). C.SUPPLY 34" FLEX CONDUIT TO STRIKE SIDE OF LANDING DOORS (ALL LEVELS). TERMINATE 26" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AND FLUSH WITH INSIDE FRAMING IN SHAFT. RETURNS TO HOISTWAY JUNCTION BOX (SEE NOTE F). D.SUPPLY 12" EMT OR FLEX CONDUIT TO LANDING HALL STATION JUNCTION BOX (SEE NOTE E). RETURNS TO HOISTWAY JUNCTION BOX (SEE NOTE F). E.SUPPLY 4x4 1900 BOX AT EACH LANDING WITH SINGLE GANG MUDRING. MOUNT 36-42" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR. LOCATE WHERE ADAA COMPLIANT CLEAR FLOOR SPACE OF 48" x 30" CAN BE LOCATED CLEAR OF RAMPS, WALLS, & DOOR SWINGS. CONNECT TO HOISTWAY JUNCTION BOX (SEE NOTE F) VIA 12" EMT OR FLEX (SEE NOTE D). C D E 30"48"READ AND INITIAL: I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE CONTENT OF THIS PAGE. X_______ PAGE 13 of 15 TITLE REVDRAWING NO.DRAWN BY SCALE ORIGINAL DATE JOB INFORMATION ARROW LIFT 1550 91ST AVE NE - SUITE 202 763-786-3234BLAINE, MN 55449 GENEVA SUITES-EDINA RF/PMA VPC SL-120: UPPER LANDING DOOR WBO DETAILS 11/04/2020 110420-V02 R0 NONE WORK BY OTHERS A.SUPPLY OVERHEAD LIGHT IN SHAFT & AT EACH LANDING TO PROVIDE 5 FT-CANDLES AT PLATFORM AND ALL LANDINGS THROUGHOUT LIFT TRAVEL (MOTION DETECTOR OR 24x7 REQUIRED- NOT SWITCHED) (SEPARATE CIRCUIT). C.SUPPLY 34" FLEX CONDUIT TO STRIKE SIDE OF LANDING DOORS (ALL LEVELS). TERMINATE 26" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AND FLUSH WITH INSIDE FRAMING IN SHAFT. RETURNS TO HOISTWAY JUNCTION BOX (SEE NOTE F). D.SUPPLY 12" EMT OR FLEX CONDUIT TO LANDING HALL STATION JUNCTION BOX (SEE NOTE E). RETURNS TO HOISTWAY JUNCTION BOX (SEE NOTE F). E.SUPPLY 4x4 1900 BOX AT EACH LANDING WITH SINGLE GANG MUDRING. MOUNT 36-42" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR. LOCATE WHERE ADAA COMPLIANT CLEAR FLOOR SPACE OF 48" x 30" CAN BE LOCATED CLEAR OF RAMPS, WALLS, & DOOR SWINGS. CONNECT TO HOISTWAY JUNCTION BOX (SEE NOTE F) VIA 12" EMT OR FLEX (SEE NOTE D). L A L A C D E 30"48"READ AND INITIAL: I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE CONTENT OF THIS PAGE. X_______ C TITLE REVDRAWING NO.DRAWN BY SCALE ORIGINAL DATE JOB INFORMATION ARROW LIFT 1550 91ST AVE NE - SUITE 202 763-786-3234BLAINE, MN 55449 GENEVA SUITES-EDINA RF/PMA VPC SL-120: DISCONNECT WIRING DIAGRAM 11/04/2020 110420-V02 R0 NONE PAGE 14 of 15 LINE 1 12AWG BLACK NEUTRAL 12AWG WHITE BATTERY SWITCH LOOP 14AWG RED 20AMP FEED FROM PANEL LINE LOAD 20A 5A POWER WIRING FOR VERTICAL PLATFORM LIFT WITH BATTERY RAISING & LOWERING USE SIEMENS TYPE GF221N DISCONNECT READ ALL INSTRUCTIONS & DIAGRAMS CAREFULLY! LOAD 1 12AWG BLACK NEUTRAL LOAD SIDE 12AWG WHITE BATTERY SWITCH LOOP 14AWG RED READ AND INITIAL: I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE CONTENT OF THIS PAGE. X_______ F1 = 1090 LB F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 PAYLOAD (MAX) CAR (PLATFORM) WT.MAX SHROUD WEIGHT FLOOR REACTION (INBOARD) FLOOR REACTION (OUTBOARD) WALL ANCHORING REACTION ENCLOSURE WEIGHT * FLOOR SHEAR REACTION 750 LB 340 LB SEE CHART SEE CHART SEE CHART SEE CHART SEE CHART SEE CHART SYMBOL DESCRIPTION VALUE (MAX) L1 L2 L3 L4 33.156 33.75 5.25 5.0 MODEL SHROUD HEIGHT ANCHOR HEIGHT (L5) APPROXIMATE MODEL MAX SHROUD WT. (LBS) F2 REACTION (LBS) INBOARD FLOOR F3 REACTION (LBS) OUTBOARD FLOOR F4 REACTION (LBS) WALL F5 F6 WT. (LBS)* MAX ENCLOSURE FLOOR SHEAR REACTION (LBS) F7 VALUES BELOW ARE TOTALS-DIVIDE BY THE NUMBER OF BOLTS FOR INDIVIDUAL BOLT LOADS * ON ENCLOSURES, ADD 175# FOR A ROOF OPTION AND ADD 161# FOR A 6'-8" ABOVE OPTION F1 + F2 = F3 + F4 F7 = F5 STATIC EQUILIBRIUM: F5*L5 + F4*L2 +F3*L4 = F2*L3 + F1*L1 ******** **** LAYOUT GEOMETRY STEEL PLEXI NOTE: These are the reaction forces based on the gravity loads and operation of the lift. These calculations do not include external loading due to such things as wind, snow, rain, seismic activity, etc. Adhere to local building codes, regulations, and safety factors for the supporting structures. [SUM OF FORCES AND SUM OF MOMENTS = 0] GENERIC STATIC LOADING TABLE FOR VERTICAL PLATFORM LIFTS ANCHORED TO FLOOR AND THE WALL L3 L5 L4 L1 L2 F1 F2 F3F4 F5 F7 ** ** 7-13-15 REV3 * NOTE: The enclosure weight is transferred directly to the floor along it's perimeter through pads (two to a side) except for the back side where the wing walls bolt up directly to the tower. **The reaction force values are based upon using an approximate horizontal mid-point location on the base as the point of action for the floor reaction. In reality there is a load distribution across the base plate versus a single point load. This distribution will vary by unit size, platform size and position, etc. The assumption of a point load based on the centroid of a distributed load, however, does appear to provide reasonable results. We have chosen locations of the lines of action of reaction forces based upon the applicable geometry of the components and also based on multiple FEA structural analysis runs which provide support for those choices. We also assume the outboard floor bolt reaction forces go to zero, and this assumption provides a conservative approach and is supported by multiple FEA runs. (These calculations are based upon the new leg design being implemented in 7/15.) TITLE REVDRAWING NO.DRAWN BY SCALE ORIGINAL DATE JOB INFORMATION ARROW LIFT 1550 91ST AVE NE - SUITE 202 763-786-3234BLAINE, MN 55449 GENEVA SUITES-EDINA RF/PMA VPC SL-120: STATIC LOADING TABLE 11/04/2020 110420-V02 R0 NONE PAGE 15 of 15 READ AND INITIAL: I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE CONTENT OF THIS PAGE. X_______ 120 145 123.44 743 01833 250 867120 754 250 Larkin Hoffman ATTORNEYS CITY OF EDINA MAR 0 3 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT March 1, 2021 City of Edina Cary Teague, Community Development Director Planning Division 4801 W 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Larkin Hoffman 8300 Norman Center Drive Suite 1000 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55437-1060 GENERAL: 952-835-3800 FAX: 952-896-3333 WEB: www.larkinhoffman.com Via Email and U.S. Mail Re: 6222 Braeburn Circle — Request for Reasonable Accommodation Dear Mr. Teague: This firm represents The Geneva Suites ("Geneva"), which operates the residential property at 6222 Braeburn Circle ("Property") in the City of Edina ("City"). The Property provides housing with services to its disabled residents ("Residents") in a single-family home environment. Geneva recently obtained a building permit to make alterations to the inside of the Property to accommodate up to ten (10) Residents. Upon subsequent inspection, the City building department directed the work to stop based on the assertion that per "state statute there can only be 6 occupants that are non-related." Permit ED183538 Comments (Dec. 10, 2020). The purpose of this letter is to confirm that the Residents are a protected class under The Federal Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 ("FHAA" or the "Act"), and to request reasonable accommodation under the Act to allow the ten (10) Residents to occupy the Property. Background The Property is approximately 5,500 square foot residence with six (6) bedrooms with another four (4) additional bedrooms proposed in the lower level. The Property is designed to provide each of the Residents a specifically-tailored environment that allows them to interact similar to a familial unit with shared kitchen, bath and common areas, while receiving the services necessary to address their individual disabilities. The Residents receive their individualized assistance and medical services while interacting in a family-style dynamic that allows them to maintain dignity and independence. The Residents of the Property are handicapped under the FHAA, and Geneva is requesting reasonable accommodation under the FHAA from any provisions of the City Code that would prohibit the residents to reside at the Property, including any occupancy and use restrictions that have been cited by the City's building inspector. Cary Teague, Community Development Director March 1, 2021 Page 2 CITY OF EDINA MAR 0 3 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Proposed Findings The City Code and Minnesota law set out the following criteria when considering requests for a variance. 1. The proposed variance will relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and the use is reasonable. It is no accident that both federal and state law protect residents with disabilities from discrimination. Neighbors and zoning officials frequently oppose such uses and deny the disabled access to single family residential neighborhoods. As required under the FHAA, the residents of the Property are classified as handicapped; the reasonable accommodation is necessary to afford the residents an equal opportunity to use and enjoy the dwelling as non- handicapped individuals; and, the requested accommodation is reasonable. The FHAA makes it illegal to "discriminate in the sale or rental, or to otherwise make unavailable or deny, a dwelling to any buyer or renter because of a handicap of . . . that buyer or renter . . . or any person associated with that buyer or renter." 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(1). Discrimination under the FHAA includes "a refusal to make reasonable accommodations in rules, policies, practices, or services, when such accommodations may be necessary to afford such person equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling." 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(3)(B). Discrimination further includes the refusal by the government to make reasonable accommodations to occupancy restrictions and use restrictions under the local zoning ordinance. Federal courts have repeatedly held that where zoning ordinances regulate occupancy or spacing based on familial status (i.e. related versus unrelated), in a manner that treats families different than handicapped residents of group homes, such ordinances are facially discriminatory under the FHAA. See Children's All. v. City of Bellevue, 950 F. Supp. 1491, 1497 (W.D. Wash. 1997). As noted by the courts, the practical difficulty of locating housing for the disabled in single family neighborhoods is addressed by a reasonable accommodation that allows such housing notwithstanding prescriptions contained in local law. 2. Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. This finding is not applicable to the request for reasonable accommodation since it would apply equally throughout single-family neighborhoods in the City. What is most important to the inquiry is whether the request is designed to serve Residents who are recovering physically or mentally disabled. As such, the Residents are persons with a handicap under the Act. With respect to a person, "handicap," as stated and defined in the FHAA, means: (1) a physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one or more of such person's major life activities, (2) a record of having such an impairment, or Cary Teague, Community Development Director March 1, 2021 Page 3 CITY OF EDINA MAR 0 3 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT (3) being regarded as having such an impairment, but, such term does not include current, illegal use of or addiction to a controlled substance. 42 U.S.C. §3602(h). Because the residents of the Property are physically or mentally disabled, they are therefore handicapped under the Act. Here, the reasonable accommodation is a necessity. If the variance is not approved by the City, the disabled Residents will be denied an equal opportunity to use and enjoy the housing of their choice that would otherwise be afforded to members of a single family. A supportive group dynamic that replicates a familial environment is proven to be effective in improving mental and physical health and quality of life. Without the proposed reasonable accommodation, the Residents will be denied the opportunity to reside at the Property in the supportive setting that is necessary for success in addressing their disabilities. 3. Be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance. Although the Property could arguably be relocated to a zoning district in which the use is a permitted or conditional use under the City Code, that fact does not exempt the City from making reasonable accommodation under the FHAA. "The FHAA protects disabled persons' right to live in the dwelling of their choice, not some property within the community." United States v. City of Chicago Heights, 161 F. Supp. 2d 819, 841 (N.D. Ill. 2001). Accordingly, the fact that the proposed use may be allowed elsewhere in the community is irrelevant. In Chicago Heights, the court addressed this type of objection by the city: Under the City's logic, a city could always prevail by showing that there were other locations available for the [group] home to locate somewhere in the city. However the FHAA does not only outlaw discrimination in the denial of all housing; it outlaws discrimination in the denial of particular dwellings. Id. at 836. The proposed reasonable accommodations would neither impose a burden on the City, nor would it create a fundamental alteration of the City's zoning scheme. With respect to accommodations of zoning requirements, an accommodation is not "reasonable" if it would: 1) impose an undue financial or administrative burden on a local government, or 2) if the requested modification to zoning requirements would create a fundamental alteration in a local government's land use and zoning scheme. Joint Statement of the Dept. of Justice and the Dept. of Housing and Urban Dev't, Group Homes, Local Land Use, and the Fair Housing Act (August 18, 1999). With respect to the first criteria, the proposed reasonable accommodation will not impose any financial burden on the City. The residents of Property will be supported by various state and county programs, including CADI Waiver and Medical Assistance, and create no additional burden on City staff or finances. The second criterion for reasonableness is whether the accommodation would result in a fundamental alteration of the land use or zoning scheme, or as some courts have stated, whether CITY OF EDINA Cary Teague, Community MAR 0 3 2021 Development Director March 1, 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page 4 the requested accommodation would "undermine the basic purpose which the requirement seeks to achieve." United States. v. Village of Marshall, 787 F. Supp. 872 (W.D. Wis. 1991). In the R-1 District, dwellings are limited to not more than one dwelling unit. City Code Sec. 36-433. The City's ordinance does not limit the number of individuals that can reside in a residence as part of a family. As a result, a family may lawfully consist of more than the ten (10) persons proposed to reside at the Property. 4. Not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. As proposed in this application, it cannot be said that the reasonable accommodation of the Property would fundamentally alter the City's zoning scheme. Under the FHAA, the City cannot allow a single family of ten (10) persons solely because those residents are related, but deny reasonable accommodation to allow ten (10) handicapped persons to occupy the same family- like setting. Such a refusal would deny an equal opportunity to use and enjoy the dwelling in violation of the FHAA. In determining what is a "reasonable" accommodation under the Act, federal courts and agencies have relied on several factors, including: the operation of the facility, the size and number of bedrooms, and the occupancy required to be financially feasible as a facility. In its published guidance, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has stated that "an occupancy policy of two persons in a bedroom, as a general rule, is reasonable under the Fair Housing Act." Fair Housing Enforcement—Occupancy Standards; Notice, 63 Fed. Reg. 70,982 (HUD Dec. 22, 1998). It is important to distinguish a request for reasonable accommodation from the protections for congregate living facilities under Minnesota Statutes Section 462.357, subd. 7, which ensures that group homes licensed under chapter 144D serving six or fewer persons are to be allowed as a permitted single-family residential use of property for the purposes of zoning. This language explicitly protects group homes from being otherwise discriminated against under occupancy restrictions that limit the number of unrelated occupants. It should be noted that this statute is intended to eliminate discrimination against residents of licensed group homes and cannot be relied upon to justify the refusal to make reasonable accommodations necessary to afford handicapped persons equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. The FHAA preempts both state and local land use regulations when the effect is to discriminate in the sale or rental, or to otherwise make unavailable or deny, a particular dwelling because of a handicap of a buyer or renter. See Smith & Lee Associates, Inc. v. City of Taylor, Mich., 102 F.3d 781, 799 (6th Cir. 1996). Conclusion The proposed reasonable accommodation is appropriate under the FHAA because the Residents of the Property are disabled under the Act, the reasonable accommodation is necessary, and the request is reasonable. If not for the proposed reasonable accommodations, the Residents will be excluded from R-1 District and denied the right to live at the Property in a setting that is designed to best manage and treat their disability. Geneva respectfully requests that the City Cary Teague, Community Development Director March 1, 2021 Page 5 CITY OF EDINA MAR 0 3 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT provide reasonable accommodation under the Act to protect the rights of Residents to reside at the Property. Please contact me with any questions about this letter or for additional information as may be necessary to act on this request. Thank you. Sincerely, William C. Griffith, for Larkin Hoffman Direct Dial: 952-896-3290 Direct Fax: 952-842-1729 Email: wgriffith@larkinhoffman.com cc: David Kendall, City Attorney 4829-8302-6142, v. 1 The Geneva Suites EXCEPTIONAL SENIOR RESIDENTIAL L I VI N G To: David S. Kendall, City Attorney City of Edina CITY OF EDINA MAR 0 3 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT From: Scott Hemenway The Geneva Suites Date: March 1, 2021 Re: 6222 Braeburn Circle 1. What are all impairments from which all current residents currently suffer, and what are all impairments from which Geneva Suites expects that any future residents may suffer? Mobility constraints due to spinal cord injury, Mobility constraints due to fracture of femur, Neuralgic amyotrophy, Quadriplegia, Neuromuscular dysfunction, Morbid obesity, Alzheimer's disease, Dementia 2. What will be the greatest number of res idents living at the home at one time? Ten residents; one per room 3. What is the greatest number of other employees (i.e. caretakers, Care Partners, etc.) expected to be on-site at one time? Three to four at maximum, including one nurse and two to three caregivers at a time. 4. What state agency 1 icens ur e s does this facility currently have? Minnesota Department of Health Comprehensive Home Care License Number: 397697 5. What food preparation licenses does this facility currently have? None. Food is prepared offsite at facilities licensed by the City of Bloomington LCB202100021 12207 Wood Lake Drive. Burnsville. Minnesota 55337Phone: 612-208-8888 l Fax: 952-891-8100 1 TheGenevaSuites .corn 6. What changes will be required to this facility's current state licensure if the facility houses more than six residents? CITY OF EDINA None. Additional residents will be covered under current license. MAR 0 3 2021 7. How is the Care Facility classified under Minn. R. 1305.0302? PLANNING DEPARTMENT The facility has a Housing with Services certificate from Minnesota Department of Health HFID: 33436. 8. What are the current and future residents' capacities for self-preservation in the event ofany emergency as determined by program licensure provisions? Residents range from independent to one person assist in the event of an emergency. 9. What type of fire sprinkler system and smoke detector system does the facility currently have? See attached Code Analysis from Andy Campbell Design Company, dated February 28, 2021 10. What type of fire sprinkler system and smoke detector system will be installed in the future, if different from what the facility currently has? See attached Code Analysis from Andy Campbell Design Company, dated February 28, 2021 11. Please provide a complete Code Study Analysis. See attached Code Analysis from Andy Campbell Design Company, dated February 28, 2021 4812-8395-6446, v. 4 12207 Wood Lake Drive. Burnsville, Minnesota 55337Phone: 612-208-8888 I Fax: 952-891- 8100 I TheGenevaSuites .com 12207 Wood Lake Drive, Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 Phone : 612-208-8888 I Fax: 952 - 891- 8100 I TheGenevaSuites .com The Geneva Suites E X C E P T I O N A L SENIOR RESIDENTIAL L I VI N G To: From: Date: Re: David S. Kendall, City Attorney City of Edina Scott Hemenway The Geneva Suites March 1, 2021 (Updated March 16, 2021) 6222 Braeburn Circle l. What are all impairments from which all current residents currently suffer, and what are all impairments from which Geneva Suites expects that any future residents may suffer? Mobility constraints due to spinal cord injury, Mobility constraints due to fracture of femur, Neuralgic amyotrophy, Quadriplegia, Neuromuscular dysfunction , Morbid obesity, Alzheimer's disease, Dementia 2.What will be the greatest number of res idents living at the home at one time? Ten residents; one per room 3. What is the greatest number of other employees (i.e. caretakers, Care Partners, etc.) expected to be on-site at one time? Three to four at maximum, including one nurse and two to three caregivers at a time. 4.What state agency licensures does this facility currently have? Minnesota Department of Health Comprehensive Home Care License Number: 397697 5. What food preparation licenses does this facility currently have? None. Food is prepared offsite at facilities licensed by the City of Bloomington LCB202100021 12207 Wood Lake Drive, Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 Phone : 612-208-8888 I Fax: 952 - 891- 8100 I TheGenevaSuites .com 6.What changes will be required to this facility's current state licensure if the facility houses more than six residents? None. Additional residents will be covered under current license. 7.How is the Care Facility classified under Minn. R. 1305.0302? The facility has a Housing with Services certificate from Minnesota Department of Health HFID: 33436. 8.What are the current and future residents' capacities for self-preservation in the event of any emergency as determined by program licensure provisions? Residents range from independent to one person assist in the event of an emergency. 9.What type of fire sprinkler system and smoke detector system does the facility currently have? See attached Code Analysis from Andy Campbell Design Company, dated February 28, 2021 10.What type of fire sprinkler system and smoke detector system will be installed in the future, if different from what the facility currently has? See attached Code Analysis from Andy Campbell Design Company, dated February 28, 2021 11.Please provide a complete Code Study Analysis. See attached Code Analysis from Andy Campbell Design Company, dated February 28, 2021 Additional Questions from City Attorney, dated March 16, 2021: 12.You responded that there will be three to four staff on site at one time. How many staff will be on site during the day and during which hours? How many staff will be on site at night and during which hours? See attached shift schedule and proposed shift schedule. Please note that the addition of four residents only results in one additional caregiver on site at any time. 12207 Wood Lake Drive, Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 Phone : 612-208-8888 I Fax: 952 - 891- 8100 I TheGenevaSuites .com 13.What is the delivery Schedule for the meals that are dropped off from the Bloomington location or elsewhere? Meals and other nonfood deliveries occur in the afternoon on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. 14.What other deliveries will be occurring on a regular basis and what is the schedule for those deliveries? None – as noted, nonfood deliveries occur at the same time as food deliveries. 15.Please provide a parking plan showing where it is proposed that delivery drivers, maintenance crews, staff, visitors, all other individuals coming to the site would park. See attached parking plan. Please note that no additional parking is required. 16.How often and on what schedule will yard maintenance, building maintenance, medical equipment maintenance, cleaning, and other functions occur? What is the anticipated schedule and hours of each type of maintenance? Cleaning and equipment maintenance occur daily with onsite staff. Please note that no additional personnel or staffing are required for these daily functions. 17.What is Geneva Suites’ visiting policy during a normal, non-pandemic conditions? How many visitors are allowed per resident and during what hours? See attached policy. 18.Is there currently an elevator in the building? If so, what size and capacity is the elevator and are any changes proposed to the size or capacity of the elevator? A residential elevator with a capacity of two to three people will be added as part of the renovation. 4812-8395-6446, v. 5 The Geneva Suites Braeburn - Parking Policy Purpose: To provide our resident’s family/friends, TGS Care Partner’s/staff, delivery vehicles and vendors appropriate parking space, while respecting our neighbors and their property. Scope: Resident’s family/friends, TGS Care Partner’s/staff, delivery vehicles and vendors Responsible Party: Property Manager: 612-208-8888 POLICY I. Policy Statement a. Designated spaces are outlined in the attached diagram for all Care Partner’s and visitors. Parking on the street is extremely limited and whenever possible, should be avoided. II. Procedure a. The top left side of the driveway (see diagram), are Care Partner parking spots. i. 15-30 minutes before shift switch change (based on resident/s level of needs at the time), Care Partner’s will take turns moving their cars to the cul-de-sac in front of the house. ii. Incoming Care Partner’s should park in the furthest front left positions in front of the garage (see diagram), replacing the previous Care Partner’s. III. Visitor and Open Parking Positions a. Two visitor positions are designated in the diagram b. Open positions are available for deliveries and physician IV. Restrictions a. There shall be no parking in front of or within 15 feet of residential mailboxes. Postal carriers are not required to get out of their vehicle to deliver mail. b. There shall be no parking in front of driveways. c. There shall be no parking on any residential grass V. Consequences a. On occasion, you may be asked to move your vehicle to reduce the number of automobiles parked in the public street. b. Staff may be issued points for non-compliance. c. Visitors and Staff may be fined by the City of Edina and/or vehicles may be towed at owner’s expense depending on the city violation. d. TGS is not responsible for non-compliance with the City of Edina ordinances or applicable laws and/or any fines issued. The Geneva Suites Braeburn - Parking Policy Continued HOUSE Garage Care Partner Transition Parking Visitor Visitor Care Partner 1 Care Partner 1 Care Partner 1 Care Partner 1 Open Open/ Delivery Open/ Maint. Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 12am - 6am 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6am - 7am 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 7am - 7pm 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 7pm - 10pm 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 10pm - 12am 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 12am - 6am 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6am - 10pm 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 10pm - 12am 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Current (6 residents) Potential (10 Residents) Braeburn Staffing - Caregivers/Nurses Total 8100 Old Cedar Ave S, Suite 105, Bloomington, Minnesota 55425 Phone: 612-208-8888 | Fax: 952-666-1306 | TheGenevaSuites.com Braeburn House Visitor Policy Pre-COVID-19 Visitor Policy: Up to 6 visitors were permitted at any given time. During-COVID-19 Visitor Policy: Up to 3 visitors are permitted at any given time. Post-COVID-19 Visitor Policy: The Pre-COVID-19 Visitor Policy will be reinstated resulting in up to 6 visitors at any given time. 1 Liz Olson From:Cary Teague Sent:Tuesday, April 13, 2021 1:59 PM To:Liz Olson; Kris Aaker; Emily Bodeker; Cary Teague Subject:Fwd: The Geneva Suites Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed See below and attached...please add this one to the agenda packet also....thanks Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Griffith, William C." <wgriffith@larkinhoffman.com> Date: April 13, 2021 at 1:53:40 PM CDT To: Cary Teague <cteague@EdinaMN.gov> Cc: Dave Kendall <DKendall@ck-law.com>, Scott Hemenway <Scott@thegenevasuites.com> Subject: The Geneva Suites EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Cary, Please include this email in the record of decision on the application submitted by The Geneva Suites. For context, Joe Richey and Judy Richey are mother and son, and are both disabled. They are under contract with The Geneva Suites to live in the Braeburn House when renovations are completed. John Richey, the writer of the email (below), is the primary care provider for both his wife and their son Joe and can no longer continue to be the primary provider for them due to his own mobility constraints. John plans to reside with them at the Braeburn House. I will refer to the email in my testimony tomorrow evening. Thanks for your assistance in this regard. Bill William C. Griffith Shareholder direct | 952-896-3290 mobile | 612-986-7711 8300 Norman Center Drive Suite 1000 Minneapolis, MN 55437-1060 www.larkinhoffman.com Thanks, 2 From: Catherine Decker <catherine.d@thegenevasuites.com> Date: Tuesday, April 13, 2021 at 11:54 AM To: Matt Hanley <Matt.h@thegenevasuites.com>, Scott Hemenway <Scott@thegenevasuites.com> Subject: Fw: assisted living Letter from John Richey below. Catherine Catherine Decker SVP, People Operations Main: 612-208-8888 8100 Old Cedar Ave S, Suite 105 Bloomington, MN 55425 www.TheGenevaSuites.com "Exceptional Senior Residential Living" From: JUDY AND JOHN RICHEY <judyjohnrichey@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2021 11:46 AM To: Catherine Decker <catherine.d@thegenevasuites.com> Subject: assisted living Hi Catherine The importance of Judy Joe and John Richey staying together as a family has great importance to us. The thought of moving to Braerburn House assisted living 3 has been very interesting concept to say the least. The importance of custom made improvements as accessible modifactions such as a in house elevator ceiling lifts and other modes of living would be greatly needed for us and others in need as well. Just wanted to be upfront honest and being very supportive about the living tasks at hand about the possible move to assisted living for us. Thank you for taking the time to reading this long email. If there is any thing else that is needed from us ;et me know. Thank you John Richey CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: INFORMATION IN THIS MESSAGE, INCLUDING ANY ATTACHMENTS, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE RECIPIENT(S) NAMED ABOVE. This message may be an Attorney-Client communication from the law firm of Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd., and as such is privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient of this message, or an agent responsible for delivering it to an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error, and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete the message, and return any hard copy print-outs. No legal advice is being provided or implied via this communication unless you are (1) a client of Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd., and (2) an intended recipient of this message. This message may have been sent to you using encrypted delivery. If you reply to an encrypted email, your email provider may deliver the response with encryption. [Forwarding this message may not provide the same encryption safeguards, depending on the email services being used. By doing so, you may unknowingly expose the sensitive content to others via the Internet.] Page 1 of 1 Guardian and Conservator Services, LLC PO Box 1276 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Office 952-239-1799, Fax 952-426-4681 April 13, 2021 RE: Braeburn Enhancement, City of Edina Dear City Council Members, It has come to my attention that after receiving an approved permit for construction to enhance the Braeburn House, that furtherance of the project has been unexpectedly halted. You should be aware of how critical it is that the project is successfully completed as it impacts the health and wellbeing several people for whom we serve. I am a Licensed Practical Nurse and owner of Guardian & Conservator Services, LLC. People become our clients when they need assistance with decisions regarding their health and/or finances. One client s legal guardian came to us with a request that I have been able to solve only with the help of The Geneva Suites. Our client is in a very special medical situation and requires 24/7 care in all aspects of his life. His parents are 2 of the incredibly dedicated individuals and nursing staff who provide some of this care and are instrumental in his life. His parents are aging and have their own health care needs and support. It is critical that this family of three finds a place where they can live together. Finding an assisted living where all three can continue to live together is what our client and his parents want. The enhancement project at the Braeburn House is currently the only option this family must stay together, and all receive the medical care and services they require. The family has been patiently waiting for their new home to be ready for them to move in so that they can have the on-site, 24/7 support they each really need and stay together. Please understand that for this family, completing the enhancements at the Braeburn House will make a world of difference to their individual health and let the family focus on being a family again. We reserved this special arrangement with Geneva Suites to accommodate this family s wishes. Thank you for your consideration to allow this project to continue through completion. I would be happy to answer any other questions. Rebecca Reich, LPN, NCG Guardian and Conservator Services, LLC PO Box 1276 Minnetonka, MN 55345 763-301-4270 Hennepin County Human Services 300 South Sixth Street, Minneapolis, MN 55487 612-348-3000 | hennepin.us To Whom It May Concern: Hennepin County needs a variety of housing options for people living with disabilities, seniors, and other individuals needing service and support in their housing choices. This need is not expected to diminish over time, especially as the population continues to age. This spectrum of housing choices ranges from an individual’s own home to settings that include more support and supervision. One of those options is Customized Living which is currently defined in statute as an individualized package of regularly scheduled, health-related and supportive services provided to a person age 18 years or older who resides in a qualified, registered housing-with-services establishment. In addition, 24-hour Customized living services may be provided with 24-hour supervision. Hennepin County supports this service model for the individuals who choose it and may be served and supported in those settings. A CL or 24-hour CL provider must have a comprehensive home care license under Minn. Stat. Chapter 144A with the Minnesota Department of Health. CL and 24-hour CL services can only be provided in settings registered as housing-with-services establishments under Minn. Stat. Chapter 144D. The size of these facilities is determined by the age of the residents and the waiver type paying for the services. More information about size and settings can be found at CBSM - Customized living (including 24-hour customized living) (state.mn.us). Note: Effective Aug. 1, 2021, licensing requirements for customized living providers are changing. For more information, see the March 2, 2021, eList announcement. If you have additional questions about these types of settings that serve vulnerable adults in Hennepin County, Robin Rohr is the subject matter expert on my team and would be happy to answer general questions about customized living. You may reach her at robin.rohr@hennepin.us. Hennepin County does not have contracts with customized living providers and does not endorse any one provider of these services. Sincerely, Tim D. Sullivan Tim D. Sullivan Professional Services Supervisor Quality Improvement and Licensing Team Long Term Services and Supports Larkin Ho;ffi,n"gg May I1,2021 City of Edina Attn: Mayor Hovland and City Council Members 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Larkin Hoftnan 8300 Norman Center Drive Suite 1000 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55437 -1060 cENERAT, 952-835-3800 rAx, 952-896-3333wEB: www.larkinhoffman.com Via U.S. Mail and Email jhovland@EdinaMN.gov RAnderson@EdinaMn.Gov CJackson@EdinaMN.gov JPierce@EdinaMN.gov kstaunton@EdinaMN. gov Re:6222 Braeburn Circle, Edina, Minnesota Reasonable Accommodation and Appeal of Variance Denial Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members This firm represents The Geneva Suites ("Geneva") with regard to its request for a variance to provide reasonable accommodation under the Federal Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 ("FHAA" or the "Act") to allow up to ten (10) residents to occupy the property located at 6222 Braeburn Circle (the "Property"), located in the City of Edina ("City"). On April 14,202l,the City Planning Commission denied the request. Geneva has appealed the City's denial, and this letter is intended to supplement the appeal record and address certain statements made during the initial hearing. Geneva applied for a variance under the City Code as a mechanism to grant reasonable accommodation and increase the occupancy of the Property. Geneva contends that the request warrants the issuance of a variance under Minnesota law and the City Code of Ordinances ("City Code") as described in its application narrative. This letter addresses the findings as required under the Act. Under the Act, the City must evaluate the disability of the residents, the necessity of the request, and the reasonableness of the request. Here, the request for reasonable accommodation is appropriate under the FHAA because the residents of the Property are disabled under the Act, the reasonable accommodation is necessary, and the request is reasonable. If not for the proposed reasonable accommodations, the new residents of the Property will be excluded from R-1 District and denied their rights to choose to reside at the Property in a setting that is designed to best manage and treat their disabilities. l. Disabilitv The Property is designed to serve residents with a physical or mental impairment. The impairments of residents include spinal cord injury, mobility constraints due to fracture of femur, Neuralgic amyotrophy, quadriplegia, neuromuscular dysfunction, morbid obesity, Alzheimer's disease, and dementia. As such, the residents are persons with a handicap under the Act. With respect to a person, "handicap," as stated and defined in the FHAA, means: City of Edina May 11,2021 Page2 ( 1) a physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one or more of such person's major life activities, (2) a record of having such an impairment, or (3) being regarded as having such an impairment, but, such term does not include current, illegal use of or addiction to a controlled substance. 42 U.S.C. $3602(h). Because the residents of the Property have physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one or more of such person's major life activities, they are qualified as having a "handicap" under the Act. In fact, the City staff agreed that the residents qualifr as persons with a disability under the definition established in the Act. See Staff Report to Planning Commission, dated Aprtl 14, 2021. 2. Necessitv The residents of the Property desire to live in a single-family setting in the City of Edina. The reasonable accommodation request by Geneva is a necessity to allow the residents the ability to reside at the place of their choosing. But for the accommodation, the disabled residents will be denied an equal opporhrnity to use and enjoy the housing of their choice that would otherwise be afforded to members of a single family. The Property is approximately 5,500 square foot residence with six (6) bedrooms with another four (4) additional bedrooms proposed in the lower level. The Property is designed to provide each of the residents a specifically-tailored environment that allows them to interact like a familial unit with shared kitchen, bath and cofirmon areas, while receiving the services necessary to address their individual disabilities. This setting provides a superior alternative to an institutional setting and allows them to reside in a residential neighborhood of their choice. Traditional care models can only go so far in simulating the comfortable environment of a residential home. However, given the costs associated with the administration of in-home healthcare, the residential model is only economically viable in this location by realizing efficiencies of having more than the six (6) resident occupants. The residents all choose to reside at the Property due to the success attributed to this housing model in helping residents to address their needs, increase their quality of life, and reduce the impacts of their disabilities. The in-home healthcare model offered by Geneva is in high demand, particularly in the City of Edina where the residents of the Property desire to live. According to the Minnesota Association of Realtors March 2021 rcport, the average home cost in Minnesota has gone up nearly l2%o in the last year. The availability of this type of housing is very limited, particularly in Edina, where housing costs are higher than the Twin Cities on average. Due to the high cost of the Edina housing market, property taxes, and the cost of home healthcare administration it is not economically viable to operate with only six (6) residents, nor is it economically viable to establish another care home within the community. City of Edina May I1,2021 Page 3 We have included a letter, dated April 13, 2021, from Rebecca Reich of Guardian and Conservator Services, LLC to the City Council, attesting to the importance of this model. Per Ms. Reich's letter, the Property is currently the only option that would allow a certain family of three individuals, all of whom are handicapped and represented by Ms. Reich, to live in the same care setting and receive the care necessary to ameliorate their disabilities. This is due to several factors that affect facility availability, including property values, housing availability, and the lack of group home options designed to meet the specific needs of handicapped individuals in a single-family home setting. Reasonable accommodation as requested by Geneva to allow for these individuals to reside on the Property in a setting that offers superior quality of life, healthcare, and use and enjoyment. See attached letter of Rebecca Reich, dated April I3, 202I . To further demonstrate the finding of necessity under the Act, we have included written testimony of Laura Estes which supports the need and desire of disabled residents to live in community-based housing. She is wheelchair bound and has lived at 6222Braeburn Circle for three years . See attached email correspondence of Laura Estes, dated May 7, 202l. The email you received from Carissa Anderson, an Edina resident brings home the negative consequences when residents and the family members of residents are denied community-based housing. Ms. Anderson closes her email with the values set forth in the Edina Vision Statement which support the housing opportunity offered by Geneva at6222 Braeburn Circle. See attoched email correspondence of Carissa Anderson, dated May 4, 2021. The attached letter from Mark Olson, a current resident of 6222 Braeburn Circle, highlights the unique care and environment that is provided to the disabled within a residential setting. Mr. Olson is a 56-year old contractor who experienced a life changing disability when he fell on the job. For him, the opportunity to live in a home with good food, high quality care and a family environment means he can live in dignity and respect. Mr. Olson's written testimony also supports our client's statements on the record that the opportunity to live in this setting is all too rare and demand is great. See attached email correspondence of Mark Olson, dated May 10, 202 1. Although the residents could be relocated to a zoning district or another community that does not require reasonable accommodation to the occupancy or spacing requirements under the City Code, that fact does not exempt the City from making reasonable accommodation under the FHAA. "The FHAA protects disabled persons'right to live in the dwelling of their choice, not some property within the community." United States v. City of Chicago Heights,16l F. Supp. 2d 819,841 (N.D. Ill. 2001). The new residents seek to live at the Property as the dwelling of their choice and the City's refusal to make reasonable accommodations to allow this is discrimination under the Act. 3. Reasonableness A third consideration regarding a request for reasonable accommodation is "reasonableness. "With respect to accommodations of zoning requirements, an accommodation is not "reasonable" if it would: 1) impose an undue financial or administrative burden on a local government, or 2) if the requested modification to zoning requirements would create a City of Edina May I1,2021 Pase 4 fundamental alteration in a local government's land use and zoning scheme. Joint Statement of the Dept. of Justice and the Dept. of Housing and Urban Dev't, Group Homes, Local Land Use, and the Fair Housing Act (Aug. 18, 1999). a.The Proposed Reasonable Accommodation Will Not Impose an Undue Financial Burden on the Citv With respect to the first criteria, the proposed reasonable accommodation will not impose an undue financial burden on the City. The Properties will continue to be funded through non-City sources and will not result in an undue burden on City staff or finances. During the April 14,2021Planning Commission Hearing there were several concerns raised, primarily by neighbors, regarding the volume of police calls to the Property. It is important to note that 18 of the calls, dating back to2017, were complaints by neighboring residents. And virtually all complaints regarding parking occurred in20l9 or earlier. Even the photographs showing a number of vehicles parked on or adjacent to the Property are from more than two years ago. Geneva has implemented a policy to accommodate all parking on site, which has been successful. The emergency calls cited by opponents average approximately I per resident per year. Based on the written reports of the City's Engineering Department, Chief of Police, and Assistant Fire Chief, the impacts of the use of the Property are not unduly burdensome and can be handled well within the capacity of the City's public service departments without resulting in an increased financial burden. Accordingly, Geneva's request will not result in an undue burden on the City. See Staff Report to Planning Commission, dated April I4, 2021 . The Proposed Reasonable Accommodation Will Not Result in a Fundamental Alteration of the Land Use or Zoning Scheme. The second criteria for reasonableness is whether the accommodation would result in a fundamental alteration of the land use or zoning scheme, or as some courts have stated, whether the requested accommodation would "undermine the basic purpose which the requirement seeks to achieve." United States. v. Village of Marshall,787 F. Supp. 872 (W.D. Wis. 1991). (l) Occupancy Under the Cit_v Code The proposed reasonable accommodation would not undermine the purpose as the Property is designed to and has historically functioned as a single-family residence, which is not subject to a maximum occupancy under the City Code. Minnesota Statutes Section 462.357, Subd. 7 requires the City to allow a housing with services establishment with up to six (6) persons where single-family dwellings are otherwise permitted. That provision serves as a protection for such establishments; however, the City is relying upon this language to establish a maximum occupancy for the Property based on the fact that the residents do not resemble a typical single- family and require in-home healthcare due to their disabilities. Complying with the minimum requirements of State law does not justify discrimination against the residents of the Property under the Act. b City of Edina May I1,2021 Bqge 5 Other cities have made similar assertions and relied on state law provisions that are virtually identical to the Minnesota law requiring cities to accept a minimum number of residents in a group home where single-family homes are allowed, and such contentions have been rejected by Federal Courts as discrimination under the FHAA. See Smith & Lee Associates, Inc. v. City of Taylor, Mich.,l02 F.3d 781,799 (6th Cir. 1996) (holding that notwithstanding a similar Michigan law that defined community residential care facilities with six (6) or fewer residents as a single-family use for zoning pu{poses, reasonable accommodation was required to allow up to nine (9) elderly disabled residents in a single-family residence). Although the proposed accommodation would allow an increase in occupancy of the Properties in excess of the minimum number of occupants the City is required to allow, it is consistent with the surrounding context and would not fundamentally alter the City's underlying zoning scheme. In the R-1 District, the City does not establish a maximum number of family members that may occupy a single-family dwelling. As a result, a family may lawfully occupy a property with ten (10) persons. By limiting the number of residents to ten (10), based on the fact that the residents live in a setting required to ameliorate their disabilities, the allowed occupancy is effectively lower than would be allowed for a family of related individuals. Under the FHAA, the City is prohibited from disparate treatment that would permit the Property to be occupied by ten (10) or more persons where those residents are related but deny reasonable accommodation to allow ten (10) handicapped persons to occupy the same single-family setting. The City's disparate treatment is particularly conspicuous given the size of the residence on the Property, which at 5,500 square feet could easily accommodate a large family of ten (10) or more related residents. Accordingly, unless the City is prepared to deny occupancy by a family of ten (10) or more residents, it cannot deny the same occupancy to ten (10) residents of a housing with services facility. The fact that the City Code would allow a family of related occupants the opportunity to reside in the Property with ten (10) residents, but not the handicapped residents, is facially discriminatory under the Act. See Children's All. v. City of Bellevue, 950 F. Supp. 1491,1497 (W.D. Wash. 1997) (holding that ordinances are facially discriminatory under the FHAA where the ordinances regulate occupancy or spacing based on familial status and handicap in a manner that treats families different than handicapped residents of group homes). Federal Courts and agencies have relied on several factors in determining what is a "reasonable" accommodation under the act, including: the operation of the facility, the size and number of bedrooms, and the occupancy required to be financially feasible as a facility. In guidance on the application of the FHAA, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has stated that "an occupancy policy of two persons in a bedroom, as a general rule, is reasonable under the Fair Housing Act." Fair Housing Enforcement-Occupancy Standards; Notice, 63 Fed. Reg. 70,982 (HUD Dec.22,1998). In some instances, municipalities have relied on this guidance as a basis to deny reasonable accommodation by limiting reasonable accommodation to only two (2) persons per bedroom. However, the United States Supreme Court has gone as far as holding that a municipality cannot use the "reasonable occupancy standard" as a basis to deny the proposed occupancy ofa group City of Edina May 11,2021 Page 6 home. See City of Edmonds v. Oxford House, Inc., I 15 S.Ct. 1776 (1995). Here, however, the size of the Property can accommodate and has been permitted for ten (10) bedrooms, one for each resident. This occupancy is consistent with the HUD guidance on what constitutes a "reasonable" accommodation. (2) Parking/Traffic Staff has also referred to parking impacts as having a fundamental impact on the zoning scheme. However, as with occupancy restrictions, the City does not apply the same level of scrutiny to single-family dwellings in the same district as it is seeking to apply to the Property. Staff specifically indicates concerns that the added number of residents to the home would increase the high volume of traffic flow and reliance upon on-street parking and would alter the zoning scheme. Staff specifically refers to Section 36-1254 (a) (5) of the City's customary home occupation ordinance, which states that "All parking demands generated by the use (a customary home occupation) shall be accommodated within the accessory garage and the normal driveway area...." However, the Property is not operated as a home occupation, it is operated as a single- family residence. Accordingly, it must be regulated as such and not subjected to disparate treatment from other single-family properties. In general, the City does not regulate the number of vehicles parked on a single-family property, nor does the City prohibit on-street parking in this neighborhood. The City also does not regulate the guests or caretakers of residents of single-family homes in the City. Imposing disparate parking restrictions on the residents of the Property or their guests or caretakers that are not implemented on residents of traditional single-family homes would be facially discriminatory. Geneva has addressed parking complaints that were previously raised by neighbors, and the current parking mitigation plan has eliminated complaints for nearly two years. The Property currently has enough capacity to accommodate the residents, their caregivers, and guests. The proposed reasonable accommodation is expected to reduce trips to/from the site by allowing Geneva to combine split shifts for part-time staff who can now be on site full time. This creates an efficiency in staffing and which will reduce trips to and from the Property during the day. See testimony of Matt Hanley, Planning Commission hearing, dated April 14, 2021. 4. Building Official Comments During the hearing before the Planning Commission, there were several statements made by the City's building official that were speculative in nature. Geneva is not seeking reasonable accommodation to the City's building code and intends to comply with all applicable requirements. Geneva will provide both exit doors as currently shown on the proposed lower level plans, but the code does not require a switchback ramp connecting them to the front of the Property. Geneva will provide an "exterior area for assisted rescue" outside of each door in the form of a level surface (concrete or deck) that is open to above. For the southwest door, this would likely include providing a sidewalk to an area outside of the upper level room above. City of Edina May I1,2021 Page 7 Geneva's architect conducted a code study as submitted is for the ten occupants. Under the Conservation Code for Existing Buildings, Geneva anticipates that it will need to modifi the existing sprinkler system and water line as is (moving sprinkler heads as necessary). Other necessary items for the project will include: (1) provide l-hr rated floor assembly between lower level & upper level (2 layers of 5/8" drywall ceiling throughout lower level) (2) provide l-hr rated walls throughout lower level project (1 layer 5/8" drywall each side of wall) (3) install accessible communication features at two units (4) provide I fully accessible unit (as shown with latest restroom configuration for bedroom 014) (5) install an automatic fire alarm system throughout lower level (in consultation with fire alarm consultant) (6) provide 1 accessible parking space (96" wide minimum with adjacent96" wide access aisle for the full length of parking stall Geneva is committed to full compliance with the City's building code and will comply with all relevant applicable provisions. See email correspondence from Andy Campbell, Code Consultant, dated May 7, 2021. 5. Attornev's Fees It should be noted that the FHAA creates a private cause of action in United States district court when a violation of the Act occurs. The Act further allows both actual and punitive damages, as well as reasonable attorney's fees. 42 U.S.C. $ 3613. We encourage the City Council to reverse the denial by the Planning Commission and approve reasonable accommodation as requested by Geneva, as causing Geneva to incur additional costs at this time will only increase the damages sought in federal court should this matter not be resolved by the City Council. For the reasons stated in Geneva's original application and this letter, we respectfully request that the City Council reverse the Planning Commission's denial. As required under the Act, the residents of the Properties are handicapped; the reasonable accommodation is necessary to afford the residents an equal opportunity to use and enjoy the dwelling as non-handicapped individuals; and the requested accommodation is reasonable. Please contact me with any questions about this letter or the information contained herein. City of Edina May 11,2021 Page 8 Thank you. William C. Griffith, for Larkin Hoffman DirectDial: 952-896-3290 DirectFax: 952-842-1729Email: wgriffith@larkinhoffrnan.com cc:Dave Kendall, City Attorney Cary Teague, City Planner Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner Scott Hemenway, The Geneva Suites ) Guardian and Conservator Services, LLC PO Box 1276 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Office 952-239-L799, Fax 952-426-468L April !3,2027 RE: Braeburn Enhancement, City of Edina Dear City Council Members, It has come to my attention that after receiving an approved permit for construction to enhance the Braeburn House, that furtherance of the project has been unexpectedly halted. You should be aware of how critical it is that the project is successfully completed as it impacts the health and wellbeing several people for whom we serve. I am a Licensed Practical Nurse and owner of Guardian & Conservator Services, LLC. People become our clients when they need assistance with decisions regarding their health and/or finances. One client's legal guardian came to us with a request that I have been able to solve only with the help of The Geneva Suites. Our client is in a very special medical situation and requires24lT care in all aspects of his life. His parents are 2 of the incredibly dedicated individuals and nursing staff who provide some of this care and are instrumental in his life. His parents are aging and have their own health care needs and support. lt is critical that this family of three finds a place where they can live together. Finding an assisted living where allthree can continue to live together is what our client and his parents want. The enhancement project at the Braeburn House is currently the only option this family must stay together, and all receive the medical care and services they require. The family has been patiently waiting for their new home to be ready for them to move in so that they can have the on-site, 24/7 support they each really need and stay together. Please understand that for this family, completing the enhancements at the Braeburn House will make a world of difference to their individual health and let the family focus on being a family again. We reserved this special arrangement with Geneva Suites to accommodate this family's wishes. Thank you for your consideration to allow this project to continue through completion. I would be happy to answer any other questions. Rebecca Reich, LPN, NCG Guardian and Conservator Services, LLC PO Box 1276 Minnetonka, MN 55345 763-34L4270 Page 1 of 1 From: laura estes Sent: Friday, May 7, 2O2L 9:OZ PM To: Catherine Decker Dear City Council members I have been wheelchair bound since 2010 and have lived in family foster homes, corporate group homes and now currently living with Geneva Suites Assisted Living homes. I truly believe that Geneva Suites is my home. I will have lived here three years this year. Some things that make it a good fit for me is the impeccable professionalism of the staff. Both nurses and caregivers on site physicaltherapist and medicalstaff. It's the attention and care that they give to each resident day in and day out that makes community based homes for the disabled to have a good home to live and thrive. Sincerely Laura Estes 4815-1306-3145, v.1 From: Carissa Anderson Date: Tue, May 4,2021 at l2:48 AM Subject: Edina Resident Support of Geneva Suites To: <RAnderson@edinamn. , ihovland@edinamn.gov <jhovland@edinamn. , CJackson@edinamn.eov<CJackson@edinamn., JPierce@.edinamn.gov <JPierce@edinamn.,kstaunton@edinamn.gov<kstaunton@edinamn.eov> Dear Mayor and City Council Members I am a resident of Edina and have been proud to be part of this great city. We have a soon- to-be high school student and have been active in community groups and recreational sports. While this was not the city we grew up in, Edina has certainly become our home. When we moved here we appreciated the diversity that Edina had to offer as a Tier 1 suburb. There are tighter knit neighborhoods and more diversity in the families on our street than what we found in our former super suburban life. That former life involved living in a community with restrictive covenants where most families were very much the two-parent, two-kid and dog households that were majority white by a large margin. We Ioved the variety of homes and families we found in Edina. No two houses look alike, unlike our former suburban neighborhood. Recently my parents' health has taken a turn for the worse. They are now in need of a higher level of care than living independently can offer. I have always promised them that they would not go to an "institution" or nursing home. That has always been part of our family culture. I was delighted to find them a place to go after this recent turn of health. Geneva Suites had a home right in Edina that is in a neighborhood and a small group setting that feels like a home. They both were excited at the idea of being able to stay together as a couple and having the individualized care that Geneva Suites can offer them. Instead of Mom going to a Memory Care facility and Dad going to a nursing home, they could be together and get their needs met. Geneva Suites was our answer. I was very frustrated and frankly disappointed to hear that the permits had been pulled from Geneva Suites and that the living place for my parents could not be built. This was exactly the care setting that I had been looking for. I asked Geneva Suites what the issue was and how I could help. I wanted to make sure that you all hear both sides of the story. Remember that when there are complaints like these, you often are not hearing from others who support making space for our elderly in our community. I understand that folks have complained about cars and parking. Pulling permits and not allowing the elderly to move into a home that is uniquely suited to meet the needs of aging parents seems like a sledgehammer response to an issue that needs a more refined and nuanced approach. This past year has been a horrendous one on both the elderly and health care workers. This is the wrong time to take such a heavy-handed approach. It seems to me that the Edina community can work together in a cooperative manner to help solve the complex issue of how we care for our aging citizens. Now that this housing has fallen through, my father has moved into my home and my mom has moved into a home that our family just purchased in Edina. Since they will be under our care versus the skilled care of Geneva Suites, we now risk police and ambulance calls and the health of our families and our parents in taking this approach. My parents have contributed greatly to the Twin Cities Community and deserve to have their wishes to be cared for in a compassionate and loving, home-like setting that is part of our beautiful, diverse and inclusive city. Instead of shunning them away, we should make room, and work together. Further, I believe whole-heartedly that the whole community grows by seeing elderly citizens in our neighborhoods and community. It sends a positive message of generational inclusion to our young people. Lastly, I want to share a bit more about my family and my parents so you understand how very deeply this hurts my heart that my own city cannot make room for people who have contributed so much. My father is Korean and immigrated to the US just after the Korean war. He started with absolutely nothing, working as a farm worker and living in a car so he could earn enough money to go to college. That plan worked. After college he came to the University of Minnesota to begin his graduate work in Physics. He met my mother, who has been a life- long nurse working at the University of Minnesota, the old Miller Hospital and then United Hospital. They started a family and raised three adult children who also contribute greatly to our community. We are a teacher in Maplewood/North St. Paul, an in-house lawyer at a local company, and a VP of Operations at a local company as well. My dad left his graduate studies to get a job for his new family. He started as an entry-level bench scientist at 3M and then retired a member of 3M's executive conference. His grandchildren are a children's book buyer at Target HQ a Hennepin County Social Worker, and an 8tr grader at South View. The personalities behind all these "careers" are equally as giving, supporting work at various community organizations, volunteer activities and University committees. Please make room for elderly folks like my parents. Work with Geneva Suites to help address the issues and concerns ofthe neighborhood. Leadership by all ofyou includes listening to the concerns that have been raised, making sure they are legitimate (and not simply not-in-my-backyard fears), Iistening to the work that is being done by Geneva Suites to address the concerns, and then leading a collaborative solution. This work would also support the "lnclusive and Connected" feature of our community as laid out in the Edina Vision document (emphasis addedJ: Inclusive and Connected . Our community embraces diversitLand cherishes the contributions of all residents and stakeholders. 2 . Our community offers an enticing mix of residential development that retains and builds upon our strong foundation of single-family housing, but also includes a dimension of higher density multifamily options, especially for the young and the oId. o We strive to promote a healthy demographic mix that builds on the tradition of multi-generational families, and also provides entry opportunities for new people seeking to raise families, start businesses, and join our quality community. o Our residents enjoy a wide range of transportation options that foster mobility and interconnectedness. . Our cohesive neighborhoods are able to retain their unique individual character. while being linked seamlessly together into the broader fabric of our city. o Our residents benefit from close access to parks and other gathering spaces where they can regenerate, connect with community members and enjoy nature. Thank you for your attention to these important matters and for your leadership of our City. Very truly yours, Carissa Anderson Edina City Resident 4829-7 091 -1 465 , v . 1 J May 10,2021 Edina City Council Mayor James Hovland Councilman Ron Anderson Councilwoman Carolyn Jackson Councilman James Pierce Councilman Kevin Staunton Mark Olson 6222Braeburn Circle Edina MN, 55349 RE: Construction Renovations at Braeburn House Cc: Executive Assistant Jennifer Garske Dear Honorable Member of the Edina City Council I am writing in response to the renovations at The Geneva Suites, Braeburn House, located aI 6222 Braeburn Circle being halted and to urge you to lift the suspension so renovations can be completed. Housing and services to the caliber provided by The Geneva Suites is very hard to find for special needs people like me. My name is Mark Olson, I am 56, and I have lived at the Braeburn House since October 2019. Finding The Geneva Suites was life changing and life saving for me. ln order for you to understand how important and how impactful The Geneva Suites has been to me and what it would mean to others, I need to tell you my story. I have been a tradesman and contractor all my life. I have worked in the construction industry since 1983; l've owned my own business, l've raised a family, l've sought the dream so many of us aspire to. All that changed in January 2019 when I suffered a catastrophic fall. While building a garage, I accidentally stepped on some sheeting that wasn't nailed down and I fell headfirst through the trusses to the frozen concrete below. I was airlifted to HCMC. I had broken my neck in multiple places, shattered vertebrae and crushed my spinal cord. I was completely paralyzed from the shoulders down becoming quadriplegic. I spent two weeks in lntensive Care before spending the next six months in four different hospitals and rehabilitation institutions. The road to recovery was long and difficult. I was intubated, on a ventilator, used a feeding tube, had a trachelectomy and undenvent surgery to fuse my neck from C3-C7. With a lot of hard work and determination I was eventually able to get off the ventilator, breath on my own, eat solid food and speak without the trache. I had spent months in rehab strengthening my shoulders so that by shrugging/flexing it would fire my biceps to propel my arm to run the hand control of an electric wheelchair. When it came time for me to leave rehab, my family and I had a hard time finding suitable housing with appropriate care. At only 54 years of age I was not ready to live in a nursing home, nor did my family want that for me. We struggled to find places that would be able to handle my extensive care and to find places that would not be depressing to live in. We found there is a huge shortage of such facilities for people caught between worlds. The search was daunting. I first moved into an assisted living facility that claimed to have a "care wing" for residents requiring greater care. This turned out to be a nightmare. The staffing ratios were far too short leaving many residents screaming for help from their rooms. Or, the care received was sloppy, indifferent, unsanitary, or rude. lt seemed they were not used to dealing with someone who had a mind of their own; someone who could not only speak but speak up for himself. lt's insulting, disheartening, frustrating and hurtful to be treated as "less than". Having a disability does not negate my humanity nor mean my mind is feeble just because my body doesn't work. I am not to be talked over, talked down to, ignored or moved like a piece of furniture; I am a man, a human being who deserves dignity and respect. All the progress I had made in rehab was lost living in that environment not to mention depressing. ln order to maintain strength and mobility in my shoulders I require daily Range of Motion (ROM) exercises. This care was ignored and refused or when it was performed it was done so poorly and quickly that it did more harm than good. When it became apparent that this living situation was not sustainable nor endurable, we began our search anew. lt is on this second round that we found The Geneva Suites. What a blessing and life changing event it was for me and my family. From the very beginning everyone at The Geneva Suites made me and my family feel heard, respected, validated, and safe. I had initially resisted living in a group home for fear that I would be stuckinaroomeatingonlyJell-Oandfrozenpizzafortherestof mylife. ButmovingtotheBraeburnHouse has been the best thing to happen to me since my fall; it has given me hope and a home again. Under the care of The Geneva Suites nursing and care partner staff, I have not only regained lost mobility but increased mobility and control. I can now swing my left arm up and onto my lap. The first time I did this for my family, they screamed and cried with shock and tears of joy. This never would have been possible without the care and attention of The Geneva Suites staff and the high ratio of staff to residents they provide. I was the first quadriplegic The Geneva Suites took on and welcomed into their care, l'm so thankful that they did. They took my care plan very seriously, training all staff on the proper way to perform ROM and the daily care protocols I need. Their dedication to my success was evident, not only by providing ROM daily but twice daily. This no doubt aided my progress. The Geneva Suites provides a warm, caring, home environment. Meals are prepared thoughtfully and offered in wide variety. My room is spacious and has beautiful views of old growth trees and wildlife. The little things in life become all the more sweet and more important when you must rely on others for everything. I highly recommend The Geneva Suites to anyone who is disabled or has a disabled loved one who is looking for a home. The entire Geneva Suites staff from administration to nursing, to care partners are highly attentive and responsive to the needs of their residents. They see us for who we are, not for our limitations. Many have become friends; others have become family. ln my wildest dreams I never thought I would end up like this and living in a group home; life can change so quickly; you just never know. But I do know I am grateful and thankful that The Geneva Suites exist so that I can have a meaningful existence. Again, I urge you to allow the renovations on the lower level of the Braeburn House to proceed. There are others like me who need it, and the need is great. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Mark Olson From: Andy Campbell <andy@acdcstudio.com> Sent: Friday, May 7, 202L L:33 PM To: Scott Hemenway <Scott@thegenevasuites.com> Cc: Anderson, Jill J. <ja nderson@ larkinhoffman.com>; G riffith, William C. <wgriffith @la rkinhoffma n.com> Subject: Re: FW: code study analysis - 6222 Braeburn Circle, Edina HiScott, We do need both exit doors as shown on the lower level, but the code does not require a switchback ramp connecting them to the front of the property. We will need to provide an "exterior area for assisted rescue" outside of each door. This is simply a levelsurface (concrete or deck)that is open to above, where a person needing assistance would be out of harm's way. For the southwest door, this would mean providing a sidewalk to an area outside of the upper level room above. My code study as submitted is for the ten occupants. ln my opinion, Geneva Suites qualifies for an exception under the Conservation Code for Existing Buildings that would allow you to keep the existing sprinkler system and water line as is (moving sprinkler heads as necessary). The other necessary items for the project include: . provide 1-hr rated floor assembly between lower level & upper level (2 layers of 5/8" drywall ceiling throughout lower level) . provide 1-hr rated walls throughout lower level project (1 layer 5/8" drywall each side of wall) . install accessible communication features at two units . provide l fully accessible unit (as shown with latest restroom configuration for bedroom 014) . install an automatic fire alarm system throughout lower level (l am not sure of the precise technical requirements of this system. You would need to discuss with a fire sprinkler f alarm subcontractor to get an exact idea of scope & price for this) . provide 1 accessible parking space (96" wide minimum with adjacent 96" wide access aisle for the full length of parking stall) Andy Campbell, AIA Andy Campbell Design Company WWW udio.com 612-432-1891, 4815-1627-5177 , v. 1 8 April 2021 Call Time Inci ID RPT#Street Nature Addtst Business 03/29/2021 12:22:43 2021022653 6222 BRAEBURN CIR THEFT BRAEBURN SUITES 03/27/2021 23:32:50 2021022319 6222 BRAEBURN CIR DISTURBANCE BRAEBURN SUITES 03/21/2021 20:15:14 2021020678 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MED SICK PERSON DIST: 99.2 ft BRAEBURN SUITES 02/25/2021 18:11:01 2021014644 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MED CHEST PAIN DIST: .19 ft 02/25/2021 07:58:40 2021014514 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MED SICK PERSON DIST: 95.24 ft 02/07/2021 11:08:33 2021010290 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MED FALLS DIST: 62.96 ft 01/29/2021 20:50:09 2021008040 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MED SICK PERSON DIST: 154.98 ft 01/21/2021 13:36:59 2021005574 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MED SICK PERSON 01/14/2021 03:04:04 2021003551 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MED SICK PERSON 01/05/2021 18:06:05 2021001129 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MISSING PERSON 01/02/2021 10:20:41 2021000296 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MED SICK PERSON 12/31/2020 18:16:49 2020094432 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MED FALLS 11/16/2020 22:16:38 2020084264 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MED SICK PERSON DIST: 158.85 ft 09/29/2020 16:35:55 2020073040 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MED SICK PERSON 09/05/2020 22:16:59 2020066886 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MED SICK PERSON 07/08/2020 19:37:03 2020050869 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MED SICK PERSON 06/25/2020 16:53:07 2020047836 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MED SICK PERSON 06/22/2020 17:48:06 2020047195 6222 BRAEBURN CIR LIFT ASSIST DIST: 483.91 ft 06/14/2020 14:02:24 2020045586 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MED SICK PERSON 04/22/2020 21:14:51 2020032809 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MED SICK PERSON 04/14/2020 11:05:31 2020031221 6222 BRAEBURN CIR LIFT ASSIST DIST: 147.56 ft 03/01/2020 00:09:22 2020020477 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MED SICK PERSON 01/18/2020 21:00:12 2020006137 6222 BRAEBURN CIR DISTURBANCE 01/13/2020 13:32:03 2020004318 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MED HEMMORRAGE/LACERATION 07/05/2019 01:06:24 2019058607 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MED SICK PERSON 06/25/2019 08:41:23 2019054932 6222 BRAEBURN CIR PARKING COMPLAINT 04/12/2019 13:30:09 2019030719 6222 BRAEBURN CIR PARKING COMPLAINT 03/24/2019 15:18:25 2019024898 6222 BRAEBURN CIR PARKING COMPLAINT 03/15/2019 14:03:51 2019021780 6222 BRAEBURN CIR PARKING COMPLAINT 03/11/2019 11:59:51 2019020461 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC DIST: 161.09 ft 02/19/2019 13:05:42 2019014632 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MED BREATHING PROBLEMS 06/14/2018 17:48:46 2018052810 6222 BRAEBURN CIR ANIMAL COMPLAINTS 06/03/2018 10:56:07 2018049036 6222 BRAEBURN CIR NEIGHBOR DISPUTE 05/23/2018 08:38:10 2018045056 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MEDICAL EMERGENCY 05/09/2018 12:07:26 2018040495 6222 BRAEBURN CIR PARKING COMPLAINT 04/19/2018 15:09:44 2018033933 6222 BRAEBURN CIR PARKING COMPLAINT 04/12/2018 09:57:50 2018031658 6222 BRAEBURN CIR PARKING COMPLAINT 03/30/2018 15:50:20 2018028065 6222 BRAEBURN CIR PARKING COMPLAINT 03/09/2018 20:27:05 2018021240 6222 BRAEBURN CIR PARKING COMPLAINT 03/01/2018 13:54:38 2018018682 18000640 6222 BRAEBURN CIR THEFT 02/17/2018 17:42:08 2018015044 6222 BRAEBURN CIR PARKING COMPLAINT 02/16/2018 16:35:41 2018014670 6222 BRAEBURN CIR PARKING COMPLAINT 02/15/2018 16:04:36 2018014381 6222 BRAEBURN CIR PARKING COMPLAINT 02/06/2018 21:29:44 2018011590 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MEDICAL EMERGENCY 02/06/2018 16:25:53 2018011504 6222 BRAEBURN CIR ATTEMPT TO LOCATE 02/02/2018 15:33:12 2018010450 6222 BRAEBURN CIR PARKING COMPLAINT 02/01/2018 10:32:47 2018010064 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MEDICAL EMERGENCY 01/28/2018 10:46:59 2018008857 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MEDICAL EMERGENCY 01/25/2018 14:32:29 2018007821 6222 BRAEBURN CIR PARKING COMPLAINT 01/19/2018 13:27:43 2018005923 6222 BRAEBURN CIR PARKING COMPLAINT 01/10/2018 16:56:56 2018002874 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MEDICAL EMERGENCY 01/09/2018 14:32:45 2018002532 18000096 6222 BRAEBURN CIR ATTEMPT TO LOCATE 12/31/2017 09:21:06 2017123928 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MEDICAL EMERGENCY 12/21/2017 11:06:25 2017121086 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MEDICAL EMERGENCY DIST: 116.23 ft 12/08/2017 13:21:22 2017117015 6222 BRAEBURN CIR MEDICAL EMERGENCY 12/06/2017 15:22:03 2017116431 6222 BRAEBURN CIR ATTEMPT TO LOCATE Date: May 18, 2021 Agenda Item #: VIII.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance No. 2021-03 Resolution No. 2021-41 Preliminary Rezoning from PCD-1 and APD to PUD at 4917 Eden Avenue CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to close the public hearing at noon, May 26, 2021 and to continue action on these items to the June 1, 2021 City Council meeting. INTRODUCTION: The City Council is asked to consider a proposal to re-develop 4917 Eden Avenue, which is currently occupied by a Perkins Restaurant. See attached plans and narrative. T he applicant would tear down the existing Perkins and office building and build a seven (7) story 208-unit apartment and 3,700 square foot restaurant. Twenty percent of the units would be for affordable housing for families earning 60% area median income (AMI) for the Twin Cities. Parking for the housing would be provided underneath the building with 277 stalls. There would be 29 surface parking stalls on the west side of the site to serve the restaurant. The proposal does not include the City owned parcel to the north. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-41 (Denial) Resolution No. 2021-41 (Approval) Ordinance No. 2021-03 Staff Memos to the Planning Commission, April 28 Better Together Public Hearing Comments Site Location, Zoning, Height, Comp Plan, & Setback Applicant Narrative, Proposed Plans, & Elevations Applicant Response to the 7 Guiding Principles Traffic and Parking Study Sustainability Questionnaire Grandview Development Framework & Transportation Plan RESOLUTION NO. 2021-41 DENYING PRELIMINARY REZONING FROM PCD-31 PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT-1 AND APD, AUTOMOBILE PARKING DISTRICT TO PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN AT 4917 EDEN AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 RueterWalton is proposing to re-develop 4917 Eden Avenue, currently occupied by a Perkins Restaurant and office building. The applicant would tear down the existing Perkins and office and build a seven (7) story 196-unit apartment and 3,700 square foot restaurant. The applicant noted a revision in the affordable housing provided from 20% of the units at 60% AMI to 10% of the units at 50% AMI. 1.02 On April 28, 2021, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the Request. Vote: 7 Ayes and 2 Nays. 1.03 On May 18, 2021 the City Council held a public hearing and considered the request. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Denial is based on the following findings: 1. Does not adequately address the Seven Guiding Principles of the Grandview District. 2. The proposed height and density are not reasonable for the site. The maximum height for the property is four stories and 48 feet. 3. The proposal does not meet the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The proposal does not meet the purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater RESOLUTION NO. 2021-41 Page 2 management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. Section 3. DENIAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, denies the for Preliminary Rezoning of the site from PCD-1, Planned Commercial District-1 and APD, Automobile Parking District to PUD-21, Planned Unit District – 21. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on June 1, 2021. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) RESOLUTION NO. 2021-41 Page 3 CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 1, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2021. _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2021-41 APPROVING PRELIMINARY REZONING FROM PCD-31 PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT-1 AND APD, AUTOMOBILE PARKING DISTRICT TO PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN AT 4917 EDEN AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 RueterWalton is proposing to re-develop 4917 Eden Avenue, currently occupied by a Perkins Restaurant and office building. The applicant would tear down the existing Perkins and office and build a seven (7) story 196-unit apartment and 3,700 square foot restaurant. The applicant noted a revision in the affordable housing provided from 20% of the units at 60% AMI to 10% of the units at 50% AMI. 1.02 On April 28, 2021, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the Request. Vote: 7 Ayes and 2 Nays. 1.03 On May 18, 2021 the City Council held a public hearing and considered the request. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses, and density are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the existing Zoning on the site. 2. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The PUD zoning would: a. Promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City. c. Provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements include sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street. d. Project is of high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned. e. Maintains the efficiency of public streets and utilities. f. Provides a mixture of land uses within the development. g. Project would meet the City’s affordable housing policy. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-41 Page 2 3. The PUD would ensure that the development proposed would be the only building that would be allowed on the site unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 4. The PUD would ensure 10% of the units within the building would be for affordable housing. 5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. The 20 affordable housing units would help the City of Edina achieve its goal with the Met Council of creating 1,804 units by the year 2030. b. A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern present in much of the city will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. i. Provide visual screening and privacy to buffer cars from people, provide visual relief and allow stormwater infiltration in parking lots. ii. Evaluate current parking standards in order to encourage shared parking and minimize the visual impact of surface parking. iii. Landscaping is essential to screen parking areas, buffer adjacent residential uses and create a pedestrian-friendly environment along streets. c. Encourage successful mixed-use development. d. Create and maintain housing options that serve a diverse range of ages, household types, and economic situations. e. Ensure that public realm design respects community character, supports of commercial and mixed-use development, promotes community identity, and creates high quality experiences for pedestrians, cyclists, transit users, and motorists. f. Multifamily. This land use is defined by the multiple unit building type where each individual unit does not have direct ground floor access to the exterior. Multifamily developments are concentrated primarily along the main traffic arteries and are generally located toward the edges of the city, often in proximity to retail business establishments. Concentrations of multifamily developments are found along York Avenue, France Avenue, Vernon Avenue, Lincoln Drive, and Cahill Road. g. Per the Mixed-Use Land Use Description: “Primary uses: Retail, office, service, multifamily residential, and institutional uses. Vertical mixed-use should be encouraged and may be required on larger sites.” h. “Mixed-use development allows for a savings in time and convenience for residents who choose to live in closer proximity to where they work and shop. Community interest is served by this type of development, as the city is able to integrate additional residences and businesses more efficiently within existing city infrastructure. Pedestrian amenities and proximity of uses encourage more trips to be made by foot RESOLUTION NO. 2021-41 Page 3 or bike, reducing the increase of congestion that can otherwise result from conventional development of separated land uses.” i. “Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. j. “Support the development of mixed-use districts that provide a variety of living opportunities within a walkable and livable area.” 6. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. Wenck Consulting conducted a traffic and parking impact study and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. 7. The proposed height of seven stories is reasonable for this site. To provide affordable housing within this project, the additional height is needed to create more market rate units to help absorb the cost of the affordable housing units. The building height overlay district limits this site to four stories. The nearest single-family home to this site is 540 feet to the north. Section 36-618 (6) of the City Code requires that buildings within the PCD District that are 7 stories tall, be setback 4 times the height of the building. The building would be 76 feet tall, therefore, a 304-foot setback is required. 8. The proposed uses would be an upgrade to the current development on the site. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the for Preliminary Rezoning of the site from PCD-1, Planned Commercial District-1 and APD, Automobile Parking District to PUD-21, Planned Unit District – 21. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated March 12, 2021. 2. The Final Plans should include a shift of the building/project 5 feet to the south. 3. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-41 Page 4 4. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. Proposed bike parking stalls should be in convenient, well-lit locations within 50’ of a public entrance to a principal building. Rack style and spacing should follow the recommendations of the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (APBP) 5. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 6. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 7. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 8. A Developer’s Agreement/Site Improvement Plan Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 9. The project must conform to the City’s affordable housing policy. The project shall provide 10% of the units (20 units) within the building for affordable housing for families earning 50% area median income (AMI) for the Twin Cities. 10. Compliance with all the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated April 21, 2021 and the transportation engineer memo dated April 21, 2021. 11. Compliance with the Wenck Consulting Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. 12. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment revising the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 13. Provision of a green roof and solar garden as shown on the building renderings. 14. Compliance with all the conditions outlined in the fire marshal and building official’s memo dated April 22, 2021. 15. Submittal of a construction management plan subject to review and approval of city staff prior to issuance of a building permit. The plan must demonstrate minimal impact to pedestrian and vehicle movement. 16. Hours of construction must be consistent with City Code. 17. Provide the necessary easement for potential highway off-ramp along the westerly property line. 18. Driveway Entrance permit required for entrance reconstruction. Driveway on Wilson Road shall be at least 50-feet from the intersection with Eden Ave per City Code. 19. Maintenance of sidewalks to be responsibility of property owner. Maintenance of sidewalks on Eden Ave and Wilson Road will be by the City. City snowplowing operations are 5-feet wide on these sidewalks. If owner wants a wider path, this would be the responsibility of the owner. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-41 Page 5 20. Install a sidewalk from the restaurant entrance and west side parking area to Eden Avenue for pedestrian access and safety. 21. Pedestrian crossing improvements shall be made to the intersection of Willson and Eden Avenue subject to approval of the city engineer. 22. The City Council should fund improvements in the area per the bike and pedestrian plan and accelerate the short-term goals of the Grandview Transportation Plan. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on June 1, 2021. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 1, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2021. _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk DRAFT ORDINANCE FOR CONSIDERATION MAY 18, 2021 Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX ORDINANCE NO. 2021-03 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD PUD-21, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-21, AT 4719 EDEN AVENUE The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended to add the following: Sec. 36-505 Planned Unit Development District-21 (PUD-21) – 4719 Eden Avenue (a) Legal description: Tract A and C, Registered Land Survey No. 1501 Hennepin County Minnesota. (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans, including the master development plan for the site received by the City on ___________ except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2021-___ on file in the Office of the Planning Department. (c) Principal Uses: All uses allowed in the PCD-1 Zoning District Multifamily Residential (d) Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the PCD-1 Zoning District. All accessory uses allowed in the PCD-1 Zoning District (e) Conditional Uses: None Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 2 (f) Development Standards. In addition to the development standards per the PCD- 1 Zoning District, the following shall apply: Standard Building Setbacks Front – Eden Avenue Front – Wilson Road Side – Highway 100 Side – South 15 feet building 5 feet posts (30 feet to curb) 15 feet (35’ to curb) 100+ feet 10 feet Building Height 7 stories and 76 feet Proximity to R-1, Single- family homes 540 feet Density 94 units per acre Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 2.5% Parking 277 spaces 29 + 8 on east side, with room for more on west side if needed (g) Signs shall be regulated per the PCD-1 Zoning District for the retail uses, and PRD, for the residential uses. (h) The residential housing on the site shall include 10% of all the dwelling units to meet the City’s definition of affordable housing. Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 3 ATTEST: ______________________________ _____________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of _______, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of ____________, 2021. ________________________________ City Clerk The Planning Commission is asked to consider a proposal to re-develop 4917 Eden Avenue, which is currently occupied by a Perkins Restaurant and office building. (See attached plans and narrative.) The applicant would tear down the existing Perkins and office and build a seven (7) story 196-unit apartment and 3,700 square foot restaurant. The applicant has indicated a desire to reduce the number of units from 208 to 196. Twenty percent of the units would be for affordable housing for families earning 60% area median income (AMI) for the Twin Cities. Parking for the housing would be provided underneath the building with 277 stalls. There would be 29 surface parking stalls on the west side of the site to serve the restaurant. There would be 8 stalls on the east side of the building that could also be utilized. The proposal does not include the City owned property to the north. This site is impacted by the 2016 Grandview Transportation Plan. The Plan calls for a proposed roadway on this site that would accommodate a new exit ramp off 100 and a frontage road. (See attached pages from the Grandview Transportation Plan.) The applicant is proposing to dedicate that area to City of Edina in an easement for future road construction. The applicant has provided responses the seven guiding principles for development in the Grandview District. (See attached.) The request would require the following: 1. Rezoning from PCD-1, Planned Commercial District-1 and APD, Automobile Parking District (the south parking lot is zoned APD) to PUD. Flexibility would be requested through the PUD Ordinance to vary from setback, height, and floor area ratio (FAR) requirements. The PUD Zoning is used to ensure that the affordable housing proposed in the project is included. April 28, 2021 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Preliminary Rezoning from PCD-1, Planned Commercial District-1 and APD, Automobile Parking District (the south parking lot is zoned APD) to PUD at 4917 Eden Avenue. Information / Background: STAFF REPORT Page 2 The applicant has gone through the sketch plan process and has revised the plans to respond to comments from the Planning Commission and City Council. Below is a list of some of the changes: Eliminated the 52,000 square foot office building. Added a restaurant/coffee shop to provide some mixed use on the site. This was recommended by both the Planning Commission and City Council. Proposed dedication of a roadway easement to accommodate a potential new off ramp from Highway 100. Provided responses to the seven guiding principles for development in the Grandview District. Attached is the city attorney’s “pyramid of discretion.” This project is within the “green” zone, meaning this is a legislative decision in which the City has significant discretion when reviewing this application. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Grange Hall/Park; zoned R-1, Single-dwelling Unit District, and guided Mixed-Use Center (20-100 units per acre). Easterly: Edina County Club; zoned R-1, Single-dwelling Unit District and public/semi-public. Southerly: Office building; zoned POD-1, Planned Office District, and guided Mixed-Use Center (20-100 units per acre). Westerly: Highway 100. Existing Site Features The subject property is 2.08 acres in size and contains a Perkins Restaurant and office building. Planning Guide Plan designation: Mixed Use Center (12-100 units per acre). Zoning: PCD-1, Planned Commercial District and APD, Automobile Parking District Seven Guiding Principles for Development The applicant has responded to the Seven Guiding Principles. (See attached responses.) The project would dedicate public space for a future off ramp from Highway 100 to help organize the future transportation system; the project introduces residential use to the site and returns a smaller restaurant to the area to enhance the economic viability; bicycling is encouraged; EV STAFF REPORT Page 3 charging stations are provided in the site with a potential for more in the future; there would be green roofs, solar gardens, and sidewalks provided along the streets. Parking Based on the proposal for a total of 196 residential units in the PCD, Planned Commercial District 196 parking stalls are required. The proposal is to provide 277 stalls under the building for residents. There would be 8 surface stalls for a total of 285, therefore, in compliance with City Code. For the 3,700 square foot restaurant, there would be 29 additional parking stalls on the west side of the building, and the 8 surface stalls would be available. There is room to add 4 more parking stalls if needed. The parking provided would allow for a 87-seat restaurant. Site Circulation/Traffic Vehicular access to the site for the restaurant would be off Eden Avenue and access to the apartments would be off Willson Road. A roadway easement would be dedicated to the City of Edina for future roadway improvements of a new access off Highway 100, which is recommended as part of the Grandview Transportation Plan. (See future roadway improvements recommended in the Transportation Plan.) Wenck/Stantec Consulting conducted a parking and traffic study. (See attached study.) The study concludes that the existing roadway system would support the project. The net trips added to the roadway system by the proposed development would have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. No improvements beyond those already planned by the City are needed. The study further concludes that there would be adequate parking provided to support the project. Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site 31 overstory trees would be required. The applicant is proposing 94 overstory trees in the boulevards along the perimeter of the site and within the courtyard. (See attached landscape plan.) A full complement of understory shrubs and bushes are proposed. Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined in their review memo. (See attached.) A developer’s agreement would be required for the construction of the proposed sidewalks and utilities. Any approvals of this project would be subject to review and approval of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, as they are the City’s review authority over the grading of the site. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Building/Building Material The building materials would be a combination primarily brick and stone and glass, with metal panel and cement board siding accents. (See attached renderings.) Mechanical Equipment No mechanical equipment has been shown on the plans. Any rooftop and/or ground level equipment would have to be screened if visible from adjacent property lines. Final Plans must include location of mechanical equipment and the means of screening. No ground level mechanical equipment shall be located within the front yard of the development. Signage The signage allowed on the site would correspond to the use. The office uses would be subject to sign regulations of an office district; the retail uses would be subject to sign regulations of commercial districts; and the residential uses subject to the planned residential district. This would be written into the PUD. Living Streets/Multi-Modal Consideration Sec. 36-1274. - Sidewalks, trails and bicycle facilities. (a) In order to promote and provide safe and effective sidewalks and trails in the city and encourage the use of bicycles for recreation and transportation, the following improvements are required, as a condition of approval, on developments requiring the approval of a final development plan or the issuance of a conditional use permit pursuant to article V of this chapter: (1) It is the policy of the city to require the construction of sidewalks and trails wherever feasible so as to encourage pedestrian and bicycle connectivity throughout the city. Therefore, developments shall provide sidewalks and trails which adjoin the applicant's property: a. In locations shown on the city's sidewalk and trail plan; and b. In other locations where the council finds that the provision of such sidewalks and trails enhance public access to mass transit facilities or connections to other existing or planned sidewalks, trails, or public facilities. (2) Developments shall provide sidewalks between building entrances and sidewalks or trails which exist, or which will be constructed pursuant to this section. (3) Developments shall provide direct sidewalk and trail connections with adjoining properties where appropriate. (4) Developments must provide direct sidewalk and trail connections to transit stations or transit stops adjoining the property. (5) Design standards for sidewalks and trails shall be prescribed by the engineer. (6) Nonresidential developments having an off-street automobile parking requirement of 20 or more spaces must provide off-street bicycle parking spaces where STAFF REPORT Page 5 bicycles may be parked and secured from theft by their owners. The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the automobile parking space requirement. The design and placement of bicycle parking spaces and bicycle racks used to secure bicycles shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. Whenever possible, bicycle parking spaces shall be located within 50 feet of a public entrance to a principal building. (b) The expense of the improvements set forth in subsection (a) of this section shall be borne by the applicant. The applicant would be installing sidewalks along the streets. As recommended by engineering the sidewalks should be boulevard style to provide separation from the adjacent streets. See the attached memo from the transportation planner regarding the city’s Living Streets Policy. Some of the highlights and recommendations include: Proposed public sidewalks along Eden Ave and Wilson Rd should be 5’ wide (min.) with 5’ boulevards (min.) to improve user safety and comfort. Proposed trees, vegetation, signage and other items adjacent to intersections should maintain a clear view zone as defined in Section 26-190 of City Code Turning movements and travel routes for delivery vehicles should be reviewed by the applicant. Steps should be taken to minimize the impact of delivery vehicles on pedestrian and bicycle movement through the site (additional signage, designated delivery zones, etc.) The site plan notes a bike room located in the upper-level underground parking garage. Staff recommends that this room be equipped to accommodate a minimum of one bike for every 10 residential units (21). It is also recommended that this room be relocated closer to the garage entrance and/or stairs and elevators. Staff recommends providing surface bike parking stalls at a rate of 1 for every 20 residential units (11) and 1 for every 5 restaurant seats (5, assuming capacity is capped at 87 based on provided vehicle parking). These parking stalls should be in convenient, well-lit locations within 50’ of a public entrance to a principal building. Rack style and spacing for surface and underground bike storage should follow the recommendations of the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (APBP). Staff recommends installing electric vehicle (EV) charging stations for a minimum of 5% (20 stalls) of proposed parking in addition to wiring 10% (40 stalls) for EV conversion in the future. EV charging stations should be in convenient locations near primary building entrances. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. Install a sidewalk from the restaurant entrance and west side parking area to Eden Avenue for pedestrian access and safety. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Per Section 36-253 the following are the regulations for a PUD: STAFF REPORT Page 6 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for “Mixed Use Center,” which allows for residential and retail. The existing zoning on the site would also allow residential and retail uses. The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property than existing. The project provides a mixture of uses on the site. The buildings would be pulled up close to the street, with sidewalks in front, and separated from the street by green space to STAFF REPORT Page 7 promote a more walkable environment. The apartment opens toward the streets as does the restaurant. The corner is designed to be a public “art plaza.” There would be no surface parking in front of the building as the current site does. The surface lot for the restaurant is located on the west side of the building adjacent to Highway 100. It is located 100 feet from Eden Avenue. There would be a green roof and solar gardens. The proposed buildings would be a high-quality brick, stone, and glass. The design is influenced by nearby residents and commercial building. (See the attached building renderings and buildings that influenced the design.) Perhaps most importantly, twenty percent (20%) of the units (39 total) within this project would be provided for affordable housing, for families earning 60% area median income (AMI) for the Twin Cities. 2. Applicability/Criteria a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in this Chapter shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed uses are all consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. As mentioned, the site is designated as Mixed-Use Center. Uses contemplated within that area include: Primary uses are retail, office, service, multifamily residential and institutional uses. The Comprehensive Plan also encourages mixed-use development. Through the PUD rezoning, the multi-family housing would become a permitted use. b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following: i. where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as Mixed-Use Center; the proposal includes mixed uses with residential and restaurant. ii. any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; STAFF REPORT Page 8 The proposed land uses include a mixture of uses retail and multi-family residential within the building. These uses are also allowed in the current zoning of the site. iii. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and As mentioned, the uses allowed are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The densities allowed would be specifically stated in the PUD Ordinance. The density proposed is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The density is at the maximum; however, is justified given that 20% of the units would be for affordable housing. iv. the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above. The table on the following page shows how the proposed new building would comply with the PCD-1 Zoning Ordinance Standards and the zoning standard in the new PUD-21 District. Please note that several of the city standards are not met under conventional zoning. However, by relaxing these standards, the purpose and intent, as described in #1 above would be met. The site layout would be improved by bringing the buildings up to the street, providing front door entries toward Eden and Wilson Avenue. The proposal includes improved sidewalks to encourage a more pedestrian friendly environment along the street. The design of the buildings is of a high-quality brick and stone with large windows with a green roof and solar garden. The development would incorporate improved landscaping and green space, reduction in surface parking, and an underground infiltration area. The project would also provide a future roadway easement for the potential future new off ramp from Highway 100. The setbacks below reflect the proposed change to the plans that shift the building 5 feet to the south to move the building further away from Eden Avenue as recommended by staff. The proposal would provide extra space for the sidewalk, landscaping and plaza area. STAFF REPORT Page 9 Compliance Table City Standard (PCD-1) Proposed Building Setbacks Front – Eden Avenue Front – Wilson Road Side – Highway 100 Side – South 35 feet or bldg. height – 76’ 35 feet or building height – 76’ 35 feet or building height – 76’ 25 feet 15 feet building 5 feet posts* (30 feet to curb) 15 feet* (35’ to curb) 100+ feet* 10 feet* Building Height 4 stories & 48 feet 7 stories and 76 feet* Proximity to R-1, Single- family homes 4 times the building height 76-foot-tall building = 304-foot setback required 540 feet Density 20-100 units per acre (2.08 acres) 94 units per acre Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.0% 2.5%* Parking Housing – 1 enclosed space per unit = 208 spaces required 3,700 s.f. restaurant (77 seats) 277 spaces 29 + 8 on east side, with room for more on west side if needed *Does not meet base Zoning Standards-Flexibility would be requested through a PUD…setbacks assume a 5- foot shift of the building to the south. PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the proposal reasonable to justify PUD rezoning for this site? Yes. Staff does support the revised rezoning of the site, for the following reasons: 1. The location of this site in the Mixed-Use Center in the Grandview District. The property is Zoned PCD, Planned Commercial district. The PCD District allows restaurants and multifamily housing as a conditionally permitted use. Therefore, the uses proposed are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the existing Zoning. STAFF REPORT Page 10 2. The project would provide 20% of the units (39 unit) within the building for affordable housing for families earning 60% area median income (AMI) for the Twin Cities. These units would help the City of Edina achieve its goal with the Met Council of creating 1,804 units by the year 2030. 3. The project would provide a roadway easement for future roadway improvements per the Grandview Transportation Plan. 4. The proposed height of seven stories is reasonable for this site. To provide affordable housing within this project, the additional height is needed to create more market rate units to help absorb the cost of the affordable housing units. The building height overlay district limits this site to four stories. The nearest single-family home to this site is 540 feet to the north. Section 36-618 (6) of the City Code requires that buildings within the PCD District that are 7 stories tall, be setback 4 times the height of the building. The building would be 76 feet tall, therefore, a 304-foot setback is required. 5. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for Mixed Use Center and zoned PCD-1, which allows for retail and multi-family housing in a density range of 20-100 units per acre. The applicant is proposing to use the site as a mixed-use development including multi-family residential and a restaurant within the required density range. Project would meet the City’s affordable housing policy, by including the units in the residential building (39 units). The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property than existing. The design of the building is of a high-quality brick and stone with large windows with a green roof and solar garden. The building would be pulled up close to the street, with sidewalks in front, and separated from the street by green space to promote a more walkable environment. The apartment opens toward the streets as does the restaurant. The corner is designed to be a public “art plaza.” There would be no surface parking in front of the building as the current site does. The surface lot for the restaurant is located on the west side of the building adjacent to Highway 100. 6. The proposed project would meet the following additional goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. “Multifamily. This land use is defined by the multiple unit building type where each individual unit does not have direct ground floor access to the exterior. Multifamily developments are concentrated primarily along the main traffic arteries and are generally located toward the edges of the city, often in proximity to retail business establishments. Concentrations of multifamily developments are found along York Avenue, France Avenue, Vernon Avenue, Lincoln Drive, and Cahill Road.” b. Per the Mixed-Use Land Use Description: “Primary uses: Retail, office, service, multifamily residential, and institutional uses. Vertical mixed-use should be encouraged and may be required on larger sites.” c. “Mixed-use development allows for a savings in time and convenience for residents who choose to live in closer proximity to where they work and shop. Community STAFF REPORT Page 11 interest is served by this type of development, as the city is able to integrate additional residences and businesses more efficiently within existing city infrastructure. Pedestrian amenities and proximity of uses encourage more trips to be made by foot or bike, reducing the increase of congestion that can otherwise result from conventional development of separated land uses.” d. “Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. e. “Support the development of mixed-use districts that provide a variety of living opportunities within a walkable and livable area.” Staff Recommendation Options for Consideration & Recommendation A case can be made for approval and denial of this project. Below are options for the planning commission and city council to consider for approval and denial: Approval Recommend the City Council approve the request for Preliminary Rezoning of the site from PCD-1, Planned Commercial District-1 and APD, Automobile Parking District to PUD-21, Planned Unit District – 21. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses, and density are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the existing Zoning on the site. 2. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The PUD zoning would: a. Promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City. c. Provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements include sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street. STAFF REPORT Page 12 d. Project is of high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned. e. Maintains the efficiency of public streets and utilities. f. Provides a mixture of land uses within the development. g. Project would meet the City’s affordable housing policy. 3. The PUD would ensure that the development proposed would be the only building that would be allowed on the site unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 4. The PUD would ensure 20% of the units within the building would be for affordable housing. 5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. The 39 affordable housing units would help the City of Edina achieve its goal with the Met Council of creating 1,804 units by the year 2030. b. A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern present in much of the city will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. i. Provide visual screening and privacy to buffer cars from people, provide visual relief and allow stormwater infiltration in parking lots. ii. Evaluate current parking standards in order to encourage shared parking and minimize the visual impact of surface parking. iii. Landscaping is essential to screen parking areas, buffer adjacent residential uses and create a pedestrian-friendly environment along streets. c. Encourage successful mixed-use development. d. Create and maintain housing options that serve a diverse range of ages, household types, and economic situations. e. Ensure that public realm design respects community character, supports of commercial and mixed-use development, promotes community identity, and creates high quality experiences for pedestrians, cyclists, transit users, and motorists. f. Multifamily. This land use is defined by the multiple unit building type where each individual unit does not have direct ground floor access to the exterior. Multifamily developments are concentrated primarily along the main traffic arteries and are generally located toward the edges of the city, often in proximity to retail business establishments. Concentrations of multifamily developments are found along York Avenue, France Avenue, Vernon Avenue, Lincoln Drive, and Cahill Road. STAFF REPORT Page 13 g. Per the Mixed-Use Land Use Description: “Primary uses: Retail, office, service, multifamily residential, and institutional uses. Vertical mixed-use should be encouraged and may be required on larger sites.” h. “Mixed-use development allows for a savings in time and convenience for residents who choose to live in closer proximity to where they work and shop. Community interest is served by this type of development, as the city is able to integrate additional residences and businesses more efficiently within existing city infrastructure. Pedestrian amenities and proximity of uses encourage more trips to be made by foot or bike, reducing the increase of congestion that can otherwise result from conventional development of separated land uses.” i. “Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. j. “Support the development of mixed-use districts that provide a variety of living opportunities within a walkable and livable area.” 6. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. Wenck Consulting conducted a traffic and parking impact study and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. 7. The proposed height of seven stories is reasonable for this site. To provide affordable housing within this project, the additional height is needed to create more market rate units to help absorb the cost of the affordable housing units. The building height overlay district limits this site to four stories. The nearest single-family home to this site is 540 feet to the north. Section 36-618 (6) of the City Code requires that buildings within the PCD District that are 7 stories tall, be setback 4 times the height of the building. The building would be 76 feet tall, therefore, a 304-foot setback is required. 8. The proposed uses would be an upgrade to the current development on the site. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated March 12, 2021. 2. The Final Plans should include a shift of the building/project 5 feet to the south. 3. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be STAFF REPORT Page 14 submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 4. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. Proposed bike parking stalls should be in convenient, well-lit locations within 50’ of a public entrance to a principal building. Rack style and spacing should follow the recommendations of the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (APBP) 5. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 6. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 7. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 8. A Developer’s Agreement/Site Improvement Plan Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 9. The project must conform to the City’s affordable housing policy. The project shall provide 20% of the units (39 unit) within the building for affordable housing for families earning 60% area median income (AMI) for the Twin Cities. 10. Compliance with all the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated April 21, 2021 and the transportation engineer memo dated April 21, 2021. 11. Compliance with the Wenck Consulting Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. 12. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment revising the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 13. Dedication of public access easements of the east-west and north-south sidewalks and drive- aisles through the site and sidewalks around the perimeter of the site including an easement over the future extension of the north-south internal street and sidewalk on the Bank site. 14. Provision of a green roof and solar garden as shown on the building renderings. 15. Compliance with all the conditions outlined in the fire marshal and building official’s memo dated April 22, 2021. 16. Submittal of a construction management plan subject to review and approval of city staff prior to issuance of a building permit. The plan must demonstrate minimal impact to pedestrian and vehicle movement. 17. Hours of construction must be consistent with City Code. STAFF REPORT Page 15 18. Provide the necessary easement for potential highway off-ramp along the westerly property line. 19. Driveway Entrance permit required for entrance reconstruction. Driveway on Wilson Road shall be at least 50-feet from the intersection with Eden Ave per City Code. 20. Maintenance of sidewalks and streets internal to the site to be responsibility of property owner. Maintenance of sidewalks on Eden Ave and Wilson Road will be by the City. City snowplowing operations are 5-feet wide on these sidewalks. If owner wants a wider path, this would be the responsibility of the owner. 21. Install a sidewalk from the restaurant entrance and west side parking area to Eden Avenue for pedestrian access and safety. Denial Recommend the City Council deny the request for Preliminary Rezoning of the site from PCD-1, Planned Commercial District-1 and APD, Automobile Parking District to PUD-21, Planned Unit District – 21. Denial is based on the following findings: Denial is based on the following findings: 1. Does not adequately address the Seven Guiding Principles of the Grandview District. 2. The proposed height and density are not reasonable for the site. The maximum height for the property is four stories and 24 feet. 3. The proposal does not meet the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The proposal does not meet the purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; STAFF REPORT Page 16 f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the request subject to the findings and conditions listed above. Deadline for a City decision: July 21, 2021 Date: May 18, 2021 To: Cary Teague – Community Development Director Chad Millner, PE – Director of Engineering Cc: 4917 Eden Avenue, Owner and Development Team From: Andrew Scipioni – Transportation Planner Re: 4917 Eden Avenue – Transportation Review Reuter Walton and BKV Group are proposing to redevelop 4917 Eden Ave, currently occupied by Perkins Restaurant & Bakery. The proposed redevelopment would replace the existing building with a seven-story building with 208 residential units and a 3,700-square-foot restaurant. Wenck completed a traffic impact study (TIS) for this project on behalf of the City. This memo will review the findings of the TIS and other transportation impacts of the proposed development. Trip Generation To account for changes in traffic patterns that has occurred due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Wenck used a combination of data collected for previous studies in the area and data collected in 2021. The newly collected data was reviewed and adjusted using previous data to account for pandemic-related traffic volume reductions. This process resulted in reasonable estimates for existing volumes in non-pandemic conditions. Wenck analyzed proposed trip generation based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. This manual provides national average traffic generation rates for different land uses. Wenck estimates that the proposed development will generate an additional 1,190 daily trips compared to the existing uses. Figure 1 shows the distribution of trips for existing and proposed uses. Figure 1: Trip Generation for Existing and Proposed Uses Wenck noted that the residential portion of the development alone would generate fewer trips than the existing restaurant and office uses during the a.m. peak hour, p.m. peak hour and daily. 1,130 1,281 93 1,132 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 Existing Uses Proposed UsesTrips Apartments Office Restaurant Capacity Analysis Four roadway corridors surrounding the site were studied by Wenck (Vernon Ave/W 50th St, Grange Rd, Arcadia and Eden Aves), as well as 10 adjacent intersections along those corridors (see Figure 2). Figure 2: Study Intersections The net trips added by the proposed development are anticipated to have minimal impact on the surrounding roads through 2024. However, poor Levels of Service (LOS) were noted to four study intersections: West 50th St and Dale Dr/Sunnyslope Rd E At W 50th St and Dale Dr (Intersection 4 in Figure 2), the northbound left turn from City Hall operates at a LOS F and southbound movements from Dale Dr operate at LOS E under both existing and future conditions. Additionally, at W 50th St and Sunnyslope Rd E (Intersection 6 in Figure 2), southbound movements currently operate at LOS E during the p.m. peak hour and are expected to worsen to LOS F by 2024 in both Build and No-Build scenarios. As noted by Wenck, the minor street volumes in these cases are very low compared to the major street volume (6-31 southbound vehicles at Dale Dr and Sunnyslope Rd E during the peak hours compared to over 2,000 vehicles traveling on W 50th St during the peak hours). Minor street approaches often experience delay when accessing a major street during peak periods. However, the ratio of traffic volumes results in an acceptable level of service for the intersections overall (LOS A in all scenarios). No improvements are recommended at these intersections as any aimed at improving southbound movements would have a negative effect on the intersections overall. Grange Rd/ TH 100 northbound ramps At Grange Rd and the TH 100 northbound ramps (Intersection 8 in Figure 2), the eastbound left turn operates at LOS E during the p.m. peak hour during existing and future conditions. No improvements are recommended as adequate space for vehicle queues exists on the ramp without impacting traffic on TH 100. Eden Ave/Arcadia Ave (9) At Eden Ave and Arcadia Ave (Intersection 9 in Figure 2), the eastbound thru and right turn movements operate at LOS E. This intersection is anticipated to be reconstructed with a roundabout in 2022, which is expected to accommodate all movements at LOS A. Parking Analysis 292 underground parking stalls and 37 surface stalls are proposed for a total of 329 stalls for this site. City Code requires a minimum of one parking stall for each residential unit and one stall per three seats in the restaurant. The 292 underground parking stalls plus the 8 surface stalls shown on the east side of the property (300 total) exceed the City’s residential requirements. Based on the 29 parking stalls proposed adjacent to the restaurant, the seating capacity should be capped at 87 to comply with City requirements. Wenck evaluated parking demand for the proposed development using national data from ITE’s Parking Generation, 5th Edition. Based on this analysis, the peak parking demand is estimated at 275 stalls between 6 a.m. and 8 p.m. on weekdays, and the number of stalls proposed is sufficient to accommodate this demand. Multi-Modal Facilities 4917 Eden Ave is currently bordered by a 5-8’ edge-of-road sidewalks along Eden Ave to the north and Willson Rd to the east. 5’ edge-of-road sidewalks are also present on the north side of Eden Ave across from the site and on both sides of Eden Ave east of Grange Rd. There are no dedicated bicycle facilities on any adjacent roadways. The Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan (2018) recommends a new sidewalk on Grange Rd north of the site, buffered bike lanes on Eden Ave to the north and standard bike lanes on Willson Rd to the east. None of these recommended facilities are proposed for construction in the current 5-year Capital Improvement Plan. The Grandview District is currently served by Metro Transit Local Route 46, which serves Edina, south Minneapolis and St. Paul. Route 46 operates seven days a week with an average frequency of 30-60 minutes (15-30 minutes during a.m. and p.m. rush hours). The closest transit stops to 4917 Eden Ave are on W 50th St between Grange Rd and Dale Dr. These stops are less than ¼ mile away (less than a 5-minute walk), accessible using existing sidewalks at Edina City Hall. Additional stops exist along Eden Ave and W 50th St that are less than ½ mile away (less than a 10-minute walk) and are accessible using existing sidewalks along these streets. Compliance with Transportation Plans/Policies Table 1 details the ways in which the proposed redevelopment supports current City transportation plans and policies. Table 1: Compliance with Transportation Plans/Policies Comprehensive Plan (2018) Goal Assessment 1. Improve mobility for residents, visitors and businesses with a balanced system of transportation alternatives for transit users, pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists. The project provides facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists. 2. Implement a fully multi-modal transportation system that supports the land use vision and future land use plan for managing and shaping future growth. The project provides facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists. 3. Minimize the impacts of the transportation system on Edina’s environment and neighborhood quality of life and emphasize methods to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Staff recommends installing electric vehicle (EV) charging stations for a minimum of 5% (20 stalls) of proposed parking in addition to wiring 10% (40 stalls) for EV conversion in the future. EV charging stations should be in convenient locations near primary building entrances. 4. Reduce the overall dependence on and use of single- occupancy vehicles by promoting land use patterns that allow for shorter vehicle trips and the use of alternative travel options. The project promotes walking and biking with varied on-site amenities (restaurant, fitness center, clubhouse) and facilities for pedestrians and bicyclists. 6. Encourage and support attractive and reliable high- performance transit service and connections. The applicant should consider providing directional signage/information for local transit service or subsidizing transit passes for tenants and employees (see Draft Travel Demand Management Policy below). 7. Develop and manage parking provisions to encourage joint and shared use of facilities, ride- sharing and bicycle parking. The site plan notes a bike room located in the upper level underground parking garage. Staff recommends that this room be equipped to accommodate a minimum of one bike for every 10 residential units (21). It is also recommended that this room be relocated closer to the garage entrance and/or stairs and elevators. Staff recommends providing surface bike parking stalls at a rate of 1 for every 20 residential units (11) and 1 for every 5 restaurant seats (5, assuming capacity is capped at 87 based on provided vehicle parking). These parking stalls should be in convenient, well-lit locations within 50’ of a public entrance to a principal building. Rack style and spacing for surface and underground bike storage should follow the recommendations of the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (APBP). Staff recommends providing a bike repair station on-site, located adjacent to surface or underground bike parking. 9. Provide for efficient movement of goods within Edina, while minimizing the impacts of freight traffic on other trips and reducing negative impacts on land uses on freight corridors. Turning movements and travel routes for delivery vehicles should be reviewed by the applicant. Steps should be taken to minimize the impact of delivery vehicles on pedestrian and bicycle movement through the site (additional signage, designated delivery zones, etc.) 13. Provide and maintain adequate access to and from, and safety on, local and regional roadway adjacent to community redevelopment and other activity that potentially impacts the City of Edina. Proposed trees, vegetation, signage and other items adjacent to intersections should maintain a clear view zone as defined in Section 26-190 of City Code. 14. Manage, maintain and operate roadways to maximize wherever possible the safety and mobility of all users and all modes. Proposed public sidewalks along Eden Ave and Willson Rd should be 5’ wide (min.) with 5’ boulevards (min.) to improve user safety and comfort. Living Streets Plan (2015) Principle Assessment 2. Living Streets provide access and mobility for all transportation modes while enhancing safety and convenience for all users. The project provides accommodations for pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists. 4. The City will require new developments to provide interconnected street and sidewalk networks that connect to existing or planned streets or sidewalks on the perimeter of the development. The project includes perimeter sidewalks that connect to existing facilities in the area. 10. Living Streets are designed and built with coordination between business and property owners along commercial corridors to develop vibrant commercial districts. Staff recommends installation of an internal sidewalk on the west side between the restaurant entrance and Eden Ave to improve pedestrian access and safety. 13. Living Streets will improve the current and future quality of life for the public. Boulevard-style sidewalks along Eden Ave and Willson Rd will improve pedestrian safety and comfort adjacent to the property. Grandview District Transportation Study (2016) Long-Term Changes Assessment Future NB TH 100 Exit Ramp/Frontage Rd Simplification of the access to TH 100 is proposed through the construction of two new frontage roads between Vernon Ave/W 50th St and Eden Ave and realignment of entrance and exit ramps. With this concept in mind, this project has been designed in a manner to allow future realignment of the northbound TH 100 exit ramp into Eden Ave. Though implementation of this concept is potential decades away, Wenck notes that the proposed restaurant parking access off Eden Ave may need to be converted to a right-in/right-out access in the future due to its proximity to the new exit ramp. Grandview District Development Framework (2012) Transportation Goals Assessment 2. Create a more bike and pedestrian friendly environment by applying Complete Streets and Living Streets principles to Vernon, Eden and the local street network. Boulevard-style sidewalks along Eden Ave and Willson Rd will improve pedestrian safety and comfort adjacent to the property. 13. Reduce congestion by providing safe travel choices that encourage non-motorized transportation options, increasing the overall capacity of the transportation network. The project provides accommodations for pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists. Draft Travel Demand Management Policy (2021) Proposed Strategies (Tier 1 – min. 5 unique strategies identified) Underground bike storage for residential tenants Suggested Additional Strategies Directional signage/information for adjacent pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities Subsidized Metro Transit passes for tenants and employees Surface bike parking exceeding City requirements Bike repair station Construct perimeter and internal sidewalks 8’ wide or more to safely accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists Participate in car sharing service/provide designated residential parking stalls for car sharing service Provide information on starting/joining commuter programs Provide private shuttle for residential tenants to access grocery, retail and other amenities Transportation Commission Comments Members of the Transportation Commission were given an opportunity to provide comments on the TIS and other transportation impacts of the proposed project. These comments are reflective of individual Commissioners, not the entire Commission: Recommend expansion of the sidewalks along Eden Ave and Willson Rd as they are not ideal in width in buffer as they exist today. Recommend boulevard trees and other landscaping that enhances the public realm. Recommend realigning the proposed marked crosswalk across the west leg of Eden Ave/Grange Rd to shorten pedestrian crossing distance and improve visibility. Recommend prohibiting left turn exits from the surface parking lot entrance on Eden Ave or restricting to a right-in/right-out access only due to the limited site distance over the Highway 100 overpass. DATE: 4/21/2021 TO: 4917 Eden Ave, Owner and Development Team CC: Cary Teague – Community Development Director FROM: Chad Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Zuleyka Marquez, PE, Graduate Engineer Grace Hancock, Sustainability Coordinator Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner RE: 4917 Eden Avenue – Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for pedestrian facilities, utility connections, grading, flood risk, and storm water. Plans reviewed included civil, landscape, stormwater dated 3/12/21. Review Comment Required For General 1. Existing right-of-way or easements held by MnDOT require the City to formally ask for a turn-back. The turn-back process can take up to 12-months. General Comment 2. Deliver as-build records of public and private utility infrastructure post construction. Certificate of Occupancy 3. Maintenance of sidewalks and streets internal to the site to be responsibility of property owner. Maintenance of sidewalks on Eden Ave and Wilson Rd will be by the City. City snowplowing operations are 5-ft wide on these sidewalks. If owner wants a wider path, this would be the responsibility of the owner. General Comment Survey 4. An existing and proposed site condition survey is required. Grading/Building Permit 4.1 Show all existing and proposed public and private easements. Grading/Building Permit 4.2 Note the location of City fiber along the Wilson Rd ROW. Grading/Building Permit Living Streets 5. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. Grading/Building Permit 6. Saw cut concrete sidewalk joints on public sidewalks. Grading/Building Permit 7. Public sidewalk to be minimum 5-ft wide minimum with a 5-ft minimum boulevard. Grading/Building Permit 8. Install a sidewalk from the restaurant entrance and west side parking area to Eden Avenue for pedestrian access and safety. Grading/Building Permit Traffic and Street 9. Review fire access requirements with fire department. Fire truck turning template attached. Grading/Building Permit 10. Driveway Entrance permit required for entrance reconstruction. Building Permit 11. Wilson Rd scheduled for mill & overlay in 2024 (last done in 2012). Eden Ave concrete. Road patching shall conform to Edina Standard Plates 540, 543, and 545 as pertinent. Certificate of Occupancy 12. Provide easements if necessary, accommodate recommended sidewalk facilities where city has maintenance responsibility. Certificate of Occupancy 13. Provide easements for a potential highway off ramp along the westerly property line. Certificate of Occupancy 14. Proposed bike parking stalls should be in convenient, well-lit locations within 50’ of a public entrance to a principal building. Rack style and spacing should follow the recommendations of the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (APBP). Grading/Building Permit 15. Staff recommends installation of a bike repair station in a convenient location near the bike parking stalls. General Comment 16. Proposed trees, vegetation, signage and other items adjacent to intersections should maintain a clear view zone as defined in Section 26-190 of City Code. Grading/Building Permit 17. Driveway on Willson Rd shall be at least 50-ft from the intersection with Eden Ave per City Code. Grading/Building Permit 18. South driveway on Willson Rd and service driveway will only be allowed one curb cut. Combine driveways using one curb cut. Grading/Building Permit 19. Driveway entrances must conform to Standard Plates 410 and 415. Minimum 12’ and 24’ for 1- and 2-way entrances, respectively. Grading/Building Permit 20. Staff recommends relocating proposed bike room closer to the garage entrance and/or stairs and elevators. General Comment Sanitary and Water Utilities 21. Verify fire demand and hydrant locations. Attached system flow/pressure curve provided for developer’s design. Grading/Building Permit 22. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 23. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 24. A new sanitary main shall be installed per the plans along Wilson Rd from 5200 Wilson Road to the development site at the cost of the developer. Pipe may be installed by horizontal directional drill method. Installation coordinated with Public Works. General Comment 25. Apply for a sewer and water connection permit with Public Works. Prior to Starting Utility Work 25.1 Meter required for building service line and combined lines. No meter required for fire only service line. Grading/Building Permit 25.2 Public Works to determine acceptable installation methods. Grading/Building Permit 26. Disconnected sanitary and water services to be capped at main. 27. A SAC determination will be required by the Metropolitan Council. The SAC determination will be used by the City to calculate sewer and water connection charges Grading/Building Permit 28. Single connection from main for fire and domestic, split after main connection if allowed by the building code. Grading/Building Permit 29. Note, well onsite sealed in 2005. Moderate and low vulnerability for infiltration. Not located in a wellhead management zone. Certificate of Occupancy Storm Water Utility 30. Provide final geotechnical report with soil borings. Grading/Building Permit 31. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report meeting watershed and state construction site permit requirements. Grading/Building Permit 32. Submit watershed district permit and copies of private maintenance agreement in favor of watershed. Grading/Building Permit Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 33. A SWPPP consistent with the State General Construction Site Stormwater Permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Constructability and Safety 34. Construction staging, traffic control, and pedestrian access plans will be required. Be prepared to provide detailed plans for construction phasing and minimization of pedestrian and traffic impacts. Grading/Building Permit 35. Retaining walls over 4-ft in height require design by a structural engineer. Grading/Building Permit 36. Any short-term road closures shall be approved by the City Engineer. General Comment 37. Construction staging or construction fencing shall not impede the City’s ability to snowplow the adjacent streets. If construction fencing removes storage space for snow, developer shall be responsible for snow removal in the street adjacent to any impacts to City operations. General Comment Other Agency Coordination 38. MDH, MPCA and MCES permits required as needed. Grading/Building Permit 39. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Sustainability 40. Staff recommends installing EV chargers for a minimum of 5% of proposed parking in addition to wiring 10% for EV conversion in the future. General Comment 41. Staff prefers a larger green roof as shown in the original application. General Comment 42. Staff prefers the solar roof installation to occur with the build out of the project. General Comment 43. Staff recommends including organics recycling drop-off onsite for residents. General Comment April 22, 2021 Cary Teague, Community Development Director David Fisher, Chief Building Official & Rick Hammerschmidt, Fire Marshall 4917 Eden Ave – Old Perkins Site - New Apartment Building - Rezoning Information / Background: New seven story apartment building with 208-units and 2 tiers of underground parking. -This would be an S-1 parking and R-2 residential apartment building using the 2020 Minnesota State Building Code & Fire Code. -Provide a complete Build Code analysis with plans when submitting for the building permit. -An NFPA 13 Fire Sprinkler System is required. -Verify Address. -Verify Fire Department access. -Verify bathroom requirements are met for the occupied roof. -Verify noise ordinance is complying and is understood. Working Hours: Monday – Friday 7 A.M. to 7 P.M. Saturdays – 9A.M. to 5 P.M. Sundays and Holidays – No Work Allowed -Recommend a meeting with staff for 30, 60 and 90 percent before submitting for building permit. Survey Responses 30 January 2019 - 10 May 2021 Public Hearing Comments Better Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: Rezoning from PCD-1 and APD to PUD at 4917 Eden Avenue, Perkins VISITORS 179 CONTRIBUTORS 95 RESPONSES 100 7 Registered 0 Unverified 88 Anonymous 8 Registered 0 Unverified 92 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 20, 2021 07:44:42 am Last Seen:Apr 20, 2021 07:44:42 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Suzanne Wortham-Ressemann Q2.Address 4600 W 58th St., Edina, MN 55424 Q3.Comment I think that the building design is attractive and well thought out, offering Edina a great opportunity to continue improving neighborhoods. I’m pleased to see another restaurant taking the place of Perkins, giving those who live near by, a place to walk to, gather and socialize. I feel it’s a move in the right direction. Respondent No:2 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 20, 2021 08:27:35 am Last Seen:Apr 20, 2021 08:27:35 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Mary Jane Yue Q2.Address 6812 Gleason Road Q3.Comment I am on the NextDoor website and I am seeing so many comments from Edina residents upset over the development of so many new apartments, houses, high rises, and the latest being the Eden Avenue plan for Perkins after the restaurant moves out. There are so many concerns about too many apartments going up so quickly and one after another. I’m hoping that the City Council members will look at these comments on the NextDoor website and get an idea of how many people are upset over this, and I am one of them. Please let us know what we can do about it besides sharing our dislikes on NextDoor. Is there any way you can put it out for the residents to vote on. I know it’s a reach, but I think that the City Council needs to know what the residents are thinking. Thank you. Respondent No:3 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 20, 2021 08:52:09 am Last Seen:Apr 20, 2021 08:52:09 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Dana O'Connor Q2.Address 4602 Lakeview Drive Q3.Comment I am very opposed to the proposed development at the Perkins site. That is a small intersection used mostly be local residents, and traffic from schools. Addiing multi-level housing will overload that road and intersection. I'm assuming you want a stop light there? Sure, make more slow-down and traffic congestion. Why can we just not have single family dwellings as has existed since prob the 1930's??? This will be added traffic and just add more difficulty in getting around this area. Respondent No:4 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 20, 2021 13:04:18 pm Last Seen:Apr 20, 2021 13:04:18 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name John Wald Q2.Address 4503 Oak Dr., Edina, MN 55424 Q3.Comment As someone who lives just south of the Edina Country Club golf course, about a half mile from the site, I think this looks like a good project. Here are my general comments, based on my quick, layperson’s review of the proposed plans: 1) The site is crying out for redevelopment and is appropriate for a multi-family residential building of this scale: it is on a freeway; it is near a relatively dense commercial area; and it is far away from any single-family residential neighborhoods. 2) The height of the proposed building, seven stories, seems appropriate for the site. 3) I am not concerned about traffic generated by the project. For one thing, I would guess that it will generate less traffic than the Perkins did pre-COVID, and for another, it is located near arteries that seem to have appropriate capacity (Highway 100 and 50th Street/Vernon Avenue). 4) I hope that in looking at the area near the site, the City is considering ways to make crossing Highway 100 easier, safer, and more pleasant for pedestrians and cyclists. Walking and biking on 50th Street/Vernon Avenue between the east and west sides of Highway 100 are treacherous and impracticable, and things are not much better on the existing Eden Avenue. I was not a fan of the Lid, but I did appreciate the desire to improve connections between the east and west sides of the City. I would love to be able to safely ride my bike to the Grandview area to do quick errands. Respondent No:5 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 21, 2021 11:29:19 am Last Seen:Apr 21, 2021 11:29:19 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Bill Chrysler Q2.Address 5100 Wooddale Ave Q3.Comment April 21st, 2021 To: Edina Planning Commission RE: Rezoning of 4917 Eden Avenue Please accept these comments on behalf of Edina Country Club. Edina Country Club has been an integral part of the Edina Community since 1923. It serves as the center of the Country Club District and was one of the first residential developments in the city. Lots has changed both at the club and around the club in our 98-year history and Edina Country Club is a proponent of positive progress. As you are aware 4917 Eden Ave. (The Perkins Site) is directly adjacent to the golf course at Edina Country Club. In general terms, the Club is supportive of the direction of the proposed project. We understand the property is not currently being used to its full potential. We agree the property should be a residential development with limited retail/commercial space. We are not opposed to the property including a small restaurant/coffee shop but would oppose a larger commercial/retail presence. Constant traffic and commercial operations would be disruptive to people using the golf course. We do feel the developer is on the right track with the development and understand the need to rezone the property to PUD. The current owner of the property is also entitled to maximize their return on the investment they have made in Edina. The positives from our point of view are the thought and detail that have gone into the look and function of the property and the reputation of the developer for actively managing their properties to ensure the residents follow community rules and regulations. We were also very happy to see the developer rethought the setbacks on Wilson road to offer a green space buffer. We do ask these setbacks remain in the final approved plan. We do have a couple other concerns that we hope will be addressed during re-zoning process. 1. The height of the building(s) – This is our biggest concern as the property sits on a hill overlooking the Northwest corner of our golf course. 7 stories is going to have a very negative impact on the aesthetics of the golf course and a building of that height will cast shade over part of the golf course in the afternoons certain times of the year. While the golf course adds value to the development with great green space views, the development, as proposed, detracts from the value of the golf experience with a towering set of buildings dominating the skyline. We do like the approach of stepping back the upper stories but would ask that something closer to the 4 story limit the property is currently zoned for be seriously considered as part of the PUD. 2. The overall density of the project – 208 units feels like a lot for the services in the area. Both Edina Country Club and Interlachen Country Club are full and currently have waitlists, limiting our abilities to provide our services to the residents of the new development. If you have tried to get a table at the Hilltop on Friday night or coffee at the Starbucks across from OLG in the morning, there is always a substantial wait. There is also capacity at the schools, access to healthcare and many other considerations to be thought through. I don’t know what the right number is, but thoughtful consideration should be given before maximizing the density. Thank you for in advance for your thoughtful work to balance the needs of our growing community with the values and lifestyle expectations of the residents. I am happy to meet and discuss in more detail at your leisure. On Behalf of Edina Country Club, Bill Chrysler – General Manager Respondent No:6 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 21, 2021 11:58:33 am Last Seen:Apr 21, 2021 11:58:33 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name John Potter Q2.Address 4617 Tower St Q3.Comment We do not need more high density, high rise residential development in Edina, given the substantial increase in such space over the past five years. And certainly not in a location that would be albatross on a hill on its own. Solve the old maintenance facility/bus depot scar first. But please do not create more zoning variances for a project that is 8x the current height and 5x the height of its nearest neighbor, the old school house. Respondent No:7 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 21, 2021 18:37:27 pm Last Seen:Apr 21, 2021 18:37:27 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Chase Sayles Q2.Address 5525 Concord Ave Q3.Comment I have been going to this Perkins for my entire life, it’s a pillar of our community and one of the only things that’s stayed as- is in Edina. Replacing it with ugly, expensive condos that seem to be everywhere now should be a criminal act. This is one of the only remaining places where local youth can gather and similar housing projects that have been built have not added anything into the community. This complex is not suitable for this neighborhood and adds nothing. Please do not approve this proposal. Respondent No:8 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 21, 2021 19:21:25 pm Last Seen:Apr 21, 2021 19:21:25 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Roberta Castellano Q2.Address 4854 France Ave S Q3.Comment Reviewing the Public Notice on Edina’s website regarding the proposed redevelopment of Perkins (4917 Eden Ave.), the City states that public comments submitted through BetterTogether, and received by Noon on Thursday, April 22, 2021, will be included in the Agenda Packet for the Planning Commission’s (PC) April 28, 2021 Public Hearing. However, I confirmed with Community Development Director Cary Teague, that the City is not providing access to the Public Hearing materials until Friday, April 23, which is one day AFTER the BT submittal cut-off. Therefore, the public comment content of the PC Agenda Packet is being artificially constrained by the City’s withholding of data from the public, save for any persons who have insider connections. While some parameters are known and can be commented on prior to the full data release, the current situation is unacceptable. Respondent No:9 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 21, 2021 20:34:26 pm Last Seen:Apr 21, 2021 20:34:26 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Jeffrey Shlosberg Q2.Address 6304 Knoll Drive, Edina, MN 55436 Q3.Comment The architecture of the proposed building is cheap and trite. It does not befit the location, high on an elevated parcel, literally casting a shadow over the better architecture of City Hall. Edina deserves better design. I note that the building being replaced, the Perkins restaurant and offices, is NOT itself great architecture. But it sits low on the site, almost invisible from most elevations. This will rise high and be visible from a distance in every direction. If this building were situated in the Southdale area, I would have fewer objections. It would fit right in with some of the "army barracks" apartment buildings thrown up in recent years. But this site borders a residential area, is adjacent to the City's most important administrative building and should represent the best the City has to offer. Please send it back to the drawing board. Respondent No:10 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 22, 2021 08:50:09 am Last Seen:Apr 22, 2021 08:50:09 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Roberta Castellano Q2.Address 4854 France Ave S Q3.Comment I object to the housing unit density of the proposed redevelopment at the Perkins site (4917 Eden Ave.) due to the manner by which the City of Edina initially raised the permitted density to a maximum of 100 dwelling units per acre for this site, which actions included falsely informing the public as to the intended amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, falsely attesting to the public hearing content in the official Resolution, and falsely representing the hearing content to the Metropolitan Council. In the Comprehensive Plan, the land use category assigned to the Grandview District (guiding the District) is called "Mixed Use Center", abbreviated "MXC". In 2014, the City of Edina completed a Comprehensive Plan Amendment process, by which the residential housing unit density (“Density”) for the Grandview District MXC was set within a specified range of minimum 12 to maximum 30 dwelling units per acre (“du/acre”). In the summer of 2017, the City conducted public hearings regarding a combined request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for, and redevelopment of, the school bus garage site on Eden Ave., to construct a large apartment building, now known as the Avidor Senior Apartments, next to Jerry's Foods. In the published, public hearing notice (“published notice”), the City was required by Statute to inform the public of the purpose of the hearing. Even though the existing permitted Density was actually a maximum of 30 du/acre, the City falsely declared in the published notice that the current maximum was 75 du/acre. The City stated that the purpose of the hearing was to consider a maximum Density of 105 du/acre. In the notice, regarding location, the Comprehensive Plan Amendment appeared to pertain only to the two parcels that were to be redeveloped, as requested by the developer, quote: "Trammell Crow Development is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase density on the MXC-Mixed Use Center from 75-units per acre to 105-units per acre and Rezoning from PID, Planned Industrial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development to redevelop 5150 and 5220 Eden Avenue into a 6-story, 165-unit senior housing development." During both the Planning Commission and City Council Public Hearings, the staff presentation was consistent with the published notice by reporting (falsely) a current maximum 75 du/acre. The requested Density was stated to be maximum 100 du/acre, which was slightly less than the 105 du/acre stipulated in the published notice. When it came time to make a motion to approve a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Commissioner Thorsen (Planning Commission@June 28, 2017) and Mayor Hovland (City Council@July 18, 2017) both stated that the Comprehensive Plan was to be amended, but neither of them gave an explicit, verbal declaration of precisely HOW it was to be amended. PC Thorsen (Quote:) “I move approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and rezoning, um, as outlined in the staff memo, adding condition #9, that an agreement is worked out, uh, for a cross, uh, for crossing Eden Avenue, subject to approval of City Engineering.” (End quote.) Link queued to 1.24.43: https://youtu.be/myle7-udyl8?t=5083 Mayor Hovland (Quote:) "I would entertain, that we’ve got a, we’ve got a, three things we need to do tonight if we’re gonna do it, and I think we are, the way it sounds up here, the, on the dais. The first thing is we need a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and that requires a super majority, a four-fifths vote. So is there a motion to adopt Resolution 2017-73, which is the Resolution approving a Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding density in what we call the M, MXC Mixed Use Center District.” (End quote.) Link queued to 3.10.04: https://youtu.be/VH1ETZFNJTU?t=11404. Through its Community Development Director Cary Teague, the City of Edina submitted to the Metropolitan Council a copy of the formal Resolution. Mayor Hovland had signed the Resolution, in which he falsely attested to the content of the public hearing process. The Resolution stipulated a density increase from the actual existing maximum of 30 du/acre to a new maximum of 100 du/acre, quote: “A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density from 30 units per acre to 100 units per acre in the MXC- Mixed Use Center.” Regarding the matter of WHERE the Amendment was to apply, given that the bus garage site is located “in the MXC- Mixed Use Center”, the Resolution appeared to be consistent with the published notice, and, therefore, limited to the bus garage site. However, Community Development Director Teague convinced the Met Council staff that the Comprehensive Plan Amendment applied to the entire Grandview District (and beyond, but I will not address that here), and the Amendment was subsequently approved by the Met Council Board. And that is the story of how the Perkins site came to be guided with a maximum Density of 100 du/acre in the Comprehensive Plan. Understandably, the Met Council procedures did not require a copy of the published notice. The Met Council required a copy of the signed, official Resolution, which is signed after completing the City-Public process. Both the public and the Met Council should be able to expect the attestation to be accurate and truthful. Why has that not consistently been the case in the City of Edina? This is not the only example. Respondent No:11 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 22, 2021 20:23:48 pm Last Seen:Apr 22, 2021 20:23:48 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Scott Loving Q2.Address 4504 Golf Terrace Q3.Comment I support this project as a tasteful addition to the area. We live nearby and are also members at ECC, this will be an aesthetic upgrade while also bringing housing that fits for the location. Respondent No:12 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 23, 2021 04:34:37 am Last Seen:Apr 23, 2021 04:34:37 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Ted Carlson Q2.Address 5516 Knoll Drive Q3.Comment I am excited to see this site re-develop! Excellent plan and design. Well done. Respondent No:13 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 23, 2021 04:45:11 am Last Seen:Apr 23, 2021 04:45:11 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Josh Zuehlke Q2.Address 4616 zenith Avenue south Q3.Comment This is an exciting new project and one that Edina and this location is ready for. While the Perkins itself hold many fond memories with family and friends, the jobs that will be created, style of proposed building, potential sounds buffer for golf course, and increase in housing are all great things for the community. Respondent No:14 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 23, 2021 06:34:15 am Last Seen:Apr 23, 2021 06:34:15 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Brent Frederick Q2.Address 5108 Blake Rd S, Edina, MN 55436 Q3.Comment As any Edina resident, I’m extremely excited for this development. I think this would be a fantastic use in this location and if there was a restaurant there we would frequent often. Respondent No:15 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 23, 2021 06:45:55 am Last Seen:Apr 23, 2021 06:45:55 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Dan Freeman Q2.Address 120 Fox Hollow Drive Q3.Comment This project would be a great fit for the spot. Easy off and on to Hwy 100 and not through residential neighborhoods. I have spent most of my life living in Edina and the site looks exactly the way it did 35 years ago. Old and outdated. Respondent No:16 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 23, 2021 06:57:10 am Last Seen:Apr 23, 2021 06:57:10 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Eric Simmons Q2.Address 6600 Gleason Rd Q3.Comment Support Respondent No:17 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 23, 2021 07:30:10 am Last Seen:Apr 23, 2021 07:30:10 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Nick Dolejsi Q2.Address 4529, W. 56th St. Q3.Comment I am in support of the project. It would revitalize that area of Edina, and create a much-needed buffer from Highway 100. The project is well-designed and would be a welcome addition to Edina. Respondent No:18 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 23, 2021 07:31:03 am Last Seen:Apr 23, 2021 07:31:03 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Brian Sefton Q2.Address 5113 Gorgas Ave, Edina, MN 55424 Q3.Comment I support the new project at 4917 Eden Ave proposed by Reuter Walton because the site needs a high-quality redevelopment like the one proposed. In addition, the additional height requested doesn’t impact any surrounding views, and provides a nice buffer between the nearby neighborhoods and Highway 100. Respondent No:19 Login:PeterF Email:peter.fitzgerald@cushwake. com Responded At:Apr 23, 2021 07:34:25 am Last Seen:Apr 22, 2021 16:02:15 pm IP Address:165.225.57.45 Q1.First and Last Name Peter Fitzgerald Q2.Address Kellogg Avenue Edina MN Q3.Comment As an Edina resident, I support this project without hesitation. The use and density are consistent with the recently completed comp plan. The design of the building is important. How it looks. It is substantially more attractive than so many other new developments we've seen in other areas of our city. It presents itself as a luxury housing option for those who may want to downsize but remain in the wonderful east edina neighborhoods to remain near grandkids for example. It's clear they took cues from boutique-hotels in how it presents itself (copper and balconies..etc) to the street which is important to maintain the charm of residential in this area. What's not charming is the current site of concrete with a very outdated 20,000 SF restaurant model. There is little doubt the new development, proposed public realm/art and enhanced green space will make this site and area more attractive. I'm glad there are no adjacent residential homes. I believe traffic concerns are real but have nothing to do with this development or proposed use. In fact, I believe the traffic concerns along with any challenges entering and exiting sunnyslope have existed for years (like 30). What concerns me more is this site becoming successful retail, office, or medical office and I'm certain this is an attractive site for those categories. I recommend strongly working in collaboration with this project to enhance this outdated area. While I support the proposed off ramp as I think it can help simplify a convoluted roadway structure in this area, I do think the city needs to be proactive in limiting heights that would be immediately adjacent to 50th and therefore Sunnyslope. This would be the most northern site north of the schoolhouse. Maybe the city would commit to a height restriction or green space on the most northern site to give sunnyslope some protection. Finally, this highly attractive site will be developed into something. Therefore, let's support this as it is substantially more attractive than the alternatives. Respondent No:20 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 23, 2021 08:11:57 am Last Seen:Apr 23, 2021 08:11:57 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Judd Mackinnon Q2.Address 4412 W 58th St Q3.Comment The current building is an eye sore and I think this is exactly the type of development needed for this location. Respondent No:21 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 23, 2021 08:14:54 am Last Seen:Apr 23, 2021 08:14:54 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Peter Knudsvig Q2.Address 5716 Camelback Dr Q3.Comment This proposed redevelopment is a home run for the area and city of Edina. Thousands of cars pass this area each day, a beautiful upgrade is a must and will be very much appreciated in the future. Respondent No:22 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 23, 2021 08:15:14 am Last Seen:Apr 23, 2021 08:15:14 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Matt Hansen Q2.Address 5805 GARDEN AVE Q3.Comment I believe this is a great option for this space and would be a great addition to this area of Edina. Well done! Respondent No:23 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 23, 2021 08:32:16 am Last Seen:Apr 23, 2021 08:32:16 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Glen Miller Q2.Address 5120 W 60th Street Q3.Comment This proposed development looks nice. A lot better than other ideas I’ve seen. Respondent No:24 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 23, 2021 08:36:46 am Last Seen:Apr 23, 2021 08:36:46 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Erik Johnson Q2.Address 5821 Drew Ave S Q3.Comment I am a life-long Edina resident. I am excited about RWD's proposed new project at 4917 Eden Ave because the current use (Perkins) is not the best use for such a visible, important site. This high-quality redevelopment is exactly what the site calls for. This will bring more housing options to an underserved part of the city, particularly for families and for empty nesters wanting to downsize. For instance, my parents live in Edina, wish to downsize, and have had difficulty finding much, as options are extremely limited. I encourage you to approve the redevelopment. Sincerely, Erik Johnson Respondent No:25 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 23, 2021 08:37:07 am Last Seen:Apr 23, 2021 08:37:07 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Ray Finkle Q2.Address 5500 Woodale Ave Q3.Comment I think this would be a positive addition to the community and improvement over the current site. Respondent No:26 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 23, 2021 08:58:47 am Last Seen:Apr 23, 2021 08:58:47 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name John Wanninger Q2.Address 6509 Navaho Trail Q3.Comment I am in strong support of this project. Nick Walton is a great developer with a long track record of successfully building beautiful projects. What a great addition to a gateway of the city. Respondent No:27 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 23, 2021 09:32:11 am Last Seen:Apr 23, 2021 09:32:11 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Jillian Vinetsky Q2.Address 4728 W 66th St Q3.Comment I support the new project at 4917 Eden Ave proposed by Reuter Walton because this area needs a high-quality redevelopment like the one proposed, which will have the added benefit of creating a buffer between Highway 100 and nearby neighborhoods as well as creating many jobs for trades workers. Respondent No:28 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 23, 2021 09:34:50 am Last Seen:Apr 23, 2021 09:34:50 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Vadym Vinetsky Q2.Address 4728 W 66th St Edina, MN Q3.Comment I support the new project at 4917 Eden Ave proposed by Reuter Walton because more large apartment units (2+ bedrooms) are needed in our area. Respondent No:29 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 23, 2021 10:01:03 am Last Seen:Apr 23, 2021 10:01:03 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Peter J Donnino Q2.Address 5200 france ave so, unit 10 Q3.Comment I am in support of the Eden Ave Apartment development Project. The scale of the project seems to fit the site well and will act as a nice buffer from Hwy 100 and the residential neighborhood to the East. The project will nicely extend the west side of Hwy 100 to the East side with it's new 200 residential units and a Restaurant to serve the east side. The existing site needs a high quality redevelopment like the Eden Ave Apartment project proposed and than it will be Union built with high quality craftsmen that will be paid fair wages and benefits to support a middle class living. Respondent No:30 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 23, 2021 10:22:22 am Last Seen:Apr 23, 2021 10:22:22 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Gary frana Q2.Address 3945 Market Street apt 624 edina Q3.Comment Provides a buffer for the neighbors, city hall, and golf course from Highway 100. Respondent No:31 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 23, 2021 12:11:40 pm Last Seen:Apr 23, 2021 12:11:40 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Jen Hagness Q2.Address 6012 Hansen rd, edina mn 55436 Q3.Comment In favor! Respondent No:32 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 23, 2021 12:45:41 pm Last Seen:Apr 23, 2021 12:45:41 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Scott Shearer Q2.Address 5717 Dale Ave Edina, MN 55436 Q3.Comment This area would be served well with the addition of new luxury apartments and additional commercial/restaurant space. Respondent No:33 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 23, 2021 13:29:29 pm Last Seen:Apr 23, 2021 13:29:29 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Erik Tropple Q2.Address 5213 birchcrest drive Q3.Comment I support the rezoning. Thank you! Respondent No:34 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 23, 2021 13:55:58 pm Last Seen:Apr 23, 2021 13:55:58 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Craig Benson Q2.Address 5117 Blossom Ct Q3.Comment This will be visually more appealing. Respondent No:35 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 23, 2021 14:58:30 pm Last Seen:Apr 23, 2021 14:58:30 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Rita Younger Q2.Address 5221 Tifton Dr Q3.Comment I like the Perkins and we need affordable, tasty restaurants in this area. Respondent No:36 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 24, 2021 08:13:08 am Last Seen:Apr 24, 2021 08:13:08 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Mark Decker Q2.Address 4809 west Sunnyslope Q3.Comment I live on Sunnyslope and support this project. Well done density is a positive for all. Nick Walton is a thoughtful and talented developer and I believe this project will add to the fabric of our neighborhood. Respondent No:37 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 25, 2021 09:00:41 am Last Seen:Apr 25, 2021 09:00:41 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Thomas Lindborg Q2.Address 4706 Lakeview Dr Q3.Comment Seven Stories and 208 Units is too tall and too many units for that location. There was a reason it was zoned PCD-I. This is a residential neighborhood and not a commercial district. Not everyone in Edina wants to have mid-rises in their back yards. Build them in areas that are already zoned for buildings like this. Respondent No:38 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 25, 2021 10:30:08 am Last Seen:Apr 25, 2021 10:30:08 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Steven Lundberg Q2.Address 4801 Hilltop Lane, Edina Q3.Comment These comments are in opposition to siting any new housing at the Perkins site at 4917 Arden until 50th is made ready to comply with the Comprehensive Plan’s critical requirement for multi-mode transportation. Secondly, the proposed seven stories is completely out of character for the neighborhood and accordingly rezoning the site for this building height should be denied on that basis as well. Finally, Edina should discontinue the practice of using public subsidies to build luxury apartment complexes, and especially not use public funds or tax exemptions for the construction of penthouses that are antithetical to affordable housing. As the Planning Commission is well familiar with, “living streets”, also referred to as “livable streets,” is a cornerstone urban design principle of Edina’s Comprehensive Plan. Living streets requires connectivity by multi-mode transportation from residential dwellings to parks and commercial districts. This connectivity is referred to in the Executive Summary of the Comprehensive Plan as critical to Edina’s urban development. (e.g., from Living Streets Vision: “Transportation utilizing all modes is equally safe and accessible”) In addition, improvement of existing roadways to meet the living street standards is also set as a priority for Edina pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan. Second, 50th Street between HWY 100 and Wooddale is the principal route from the proposed new apartments to access the parks and recreational facilities at Wooddale, and to downtown Edina. This segment of 50th objectively fails to meet the multi-mode transportation standards of set forth by the Comprehensive Plan. It has no bike lanes and has been identified as the most dangerous place to bike in Edina by residents, according to a survey conducted by the City itself. It is also dangerous for young pedestrians, and not even a pleasant or inviting place for adults to walk, by any stretch of the imagination. As such, transportation along 50th is objectively not safe and accessible for all modes of transportation as required by the Comprehensive Plan. Given the above, siting new apartments at the Perkins site constitutes a clear violation of urban development requirements deemed critical by Edina’s Comprehensive Plan. In addition, a seven-story apartment building is objectively out of character with the surrounding residential neighborhood, and therefore is inappropriate for a zoning exemption. Finally, while Edina’s use of TIF funds to build luxury apartment complexes (with rooftop penthouses) has so far flown under the radar, social justice organizations are starting to target such uses of TIF as racially discriminatory, such as in Chicago. Here is a quote from plaintiff’s counsel in a lawsuit challenging Chicago’s use of TIF based on a violation of the Fair Housing Act due to disparate impact. “I would absolutely hope that this case results in a very close examination of many of these types of subsidy programs where public dollars are being used to subsidize private development,” says Aneel Chablani, Chief Counsel at the Chicago Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights, which is serving as lead legal counsel for the plaintiffs on the lawsuit. ‘What we’re trying to show, in terms of the disparate impact, I would hope would be something that is looked at in other cities because that is not necessarily unique to [Chicago’s version of] TIF.’” (This Lawsuit Is Putting a Racial Equity Lens on Economic Development Incentives: https://nextcity.org/daily/entry/lawsuit-is-putting-a-racial-equity-lens-on-economic-development-incentives) For the reasons given above, Edina should not approve the requested zoning variance and should deny TIF funding to the project. Let me close by saying that I have no objection whatsoever to an apartment building on the site – but it should be one that is properly sized without publicly funded penthouses and the residents of the complex should enjoy the ability to bike up and down 50th and even just simply walk along it without cars and trucks whizzing by at 40 MPH+ just feet away. If Minneapolis can make 50th one lane in each direction all the way from France Avenue to Lake Nokomis and beyond, certainly Edina can limit the subject stretch in the same way. There is ample capacity with one lane in each direction to service the Edina neighborhoods east of the freeway, and there are many alternative routes for residents of Southwest Minneapolis to go north or south or west to a freeway if traffic backs up once in a while at rush hour. Some time ago Minneapolis changed Hennepin, Lyndale, and Nicollet to one lane in either direction, with bike lanes, and it was transformative. Also, traffic still moves along just fine. With the same change the subject stretch of 50th could go from being an unwelcoming mini-highway to a pleasant boulevard, and there would be little impact on traffic volume. Thank you for considering my input. Best, Steve Lundberg 4801 Hilltop Lane Edina Respondent No:39 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 26, 2021 08:48:44 am Last Seen:Apr 26, 2021 08:48:44 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Arnie Bigbee Q2.Address 7621 Edinborough Way #2110, Edina MN 55435 Q3.Comment Assuming that the developer will receive incentive dollars from the City of Edina, the real measure of “return on investment” is the ability of the affordability components of the project to remain available to those needing affordable housing in perpetuity. I understand that all construction projects must, at some point, be recapitalized. There should be a way found to support that recapitalization without loosing the affordability of the designated units. Respondent No:40 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 26, 2021 09:27:48 am Last Seen:Apr 26, 2021 09:27:48 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Julie Risser Q2.Address 6112 Ashcroft Avenue Q3.Comment Trying to cross from the Perkins site to Edina City Hall is already challenging. The intersection is not a standard one, and there are no marked/signed crosswalks. This plan will mean more traffic will flowing into and out of this space. With increased levels of traffic violence including pedestrian injury and fatalities in Minnesota, I'm wondering why site plans do not include a buffer between pedestrians and the street. Edina City Hall has to be one of the least pedestrian-friendly places to access - from any direction. So what's the plan for making Edina City Hall a place that people can walk to more safely? I walk there to vote. Judging from some of the recent high-density projects including the Valley View Apartments, it seems that pedestrian safety is not on people's radar. What needs to be done in order to change this? Respondent No:41 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 26, 2021 11:51:34 am Last Seen:Apr 26, 2021 11:51:34 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Hope Melton Q2.Address 4825 Valley View Road Q3.Comment Dear Members of the Planning Commission I urge you to support the rezoning from PCD-1 and APD to PUD at 4917 Eden Ave. (Perkins site) for the following reasons: * The City of Edina has an urgent need for affordable housing and this is a perfect location near public transit, commercial and city services, and walkable streets in and around residential neighborhoods. The 39 units at 60% AMI will constitute skilled workforce housing and contribute to housing for a broad range of ages, household types, and economic circumstances. * The proposed land uses and density are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the existing zoning on the site. It also meets the City's criteria for PUD zoning. * "Building in" is critically important if we are to reduce commuter traffic--the leading cause of carbon emissions and global warming--over the next two decades as recommended by leading climate scientists. Mixed-use development enables the City to integrate additional residences and businesses more efficiently within its existing infrastructure. Approving the rezoning for 4917 Eden Avenue supports the City's affordable housing, race and equity, and sustainability goals. It's an important step in the right direction. Respectfully submitted, Hope Melton, Director Edina Neighbors for Affordable Housing Respondent No:42 Login:Cathleen Godsall Email:cgodsall@live.com Responded At:Apr 26, 2021 13:15:21 pm Last Seen:Apr 26, 2021 19:21:52 pm IP Address:73.65.28.136 Q1.First and Last Name Cathleen Godsall Q2.Address 5601 Johnson Drive Q3.Comment Dear Edina Affordable Housing Staff, Thank you for your continued efforts to make Edina more diverse in the affordable housing opportunities they try to support. This is in regards to the proposed apartment building where the current Perkins is located, specifically those proposed "affordable" units. As an Edina resident and member of St. Stephen's Episcopal Church, Edina, Affordable Housing Ministries Team who has been engaged in affordable housing initiatives with Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative (including 66 West Apartments in Edina), I have two questions about the currently proposed new apartment building on the present Perkins lot--based on my understanding of Edina City staff recommendations: "The 39 affordable housing units would help the City of Edina achieve its goal with the Met Council of creating 1,804 units by _______ the year 2030".... The Developer is proposing that 20% (39) of the units be affordable for someone earning 60% of AMI (roughly $62,000/year - skilled workforce housing - nutritionists, dental assistants, police dispatchers, teachers ). " 1) Is 1,804 the total goal for affordable rental units through-out the metropolitan area or Edina specifically? 2) What AMI levels of income are included? I’m particularly interested in learning the percentage for those proposed Edina housing units for families at the 30 % - 60% AMI level. Sincerely, Cathleen Godsall 5601 Johnson Drive Edina, MN 22436 Respondent No:43 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 26, 2021 12:58:08 pm Last Seen:Apr 26, 2021 12:58:08 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Barry Rosenthal Q2.Address 6205 Scotia Drive Q3.Comment While this looks preliminary, I support the concept of this development. It will fit in as part of the development of a "town center". With it's immediate access to Hwy 100, it will minimize traffic in the neighborhood. I assume it will comply with affordable housing requirements so it will benefit more than its own upscale residents. Respondent No:44 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 26, 2021 13:11:52 pm Last Seen:Apr 26, 2021 13:11:52 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Ryan burnet Q2.Address 5312 chantrey road Q3.Comment I am in favor of this development as it will help our tax base and Reuterwalton does excellent work. I believe the site fits for current site plan. Respondent No:45 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 26, 2021 14:10:23 pm Last Seen:Apr 26, 2021 14:10:23 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Steve Brown Q2.Address 5528 Halifax Lane Q3.Comment I am writing in support of the Staff's recommendation regarding the redevelopment of 4917 Eden Ave that you approve the zoning change from its current PCD or commercial district zoning to a PUD. I urge you to support this change as it will allow the proposed development of a seven story mixed use building that will provide a restaurant and 196 rental apartments including 20% (or 39 units) of affordable housing for households earning 60% AMI. The developer should be supported for electing the more aggressive of two affordability options in the Affordable Housing Policy. This option provides skilled workforce housing that could be a home for nutritionists, dental assistants, police dispatchers, and teachers to name a few. These 39 affordable units will help the City achieve its Comprehensive Plan goal with the Met Council of creating 1,804 affordable housing units by 2030. They and the other units will also support the Comprehensive Plan goal to create and maintain housing options that serve a diverse range of ages, household types and economic situations. All the units will benefit from this building's central location and its proximity to shopping, schools, services, and a library. The request to increase the FAR from 1.0 to 2.5 is a potential concern, I agree with the developer's narrative that: "The project site is unique in that it is bordered by highway and MnDOT land, broad local rights-of-way, parking lots and the golf course. The expansive open space surrounding the site will mitigate the impact of the proposed FAR." Another potential concern is the height of 76'. Zoning requires that as a 76' building it be 4 times that or 304 ft from the nearest R1 residences. The proposed building is 540 away from the nearest single family residences. I believe the benefits outweigh the concerns and urge you to approve the requested change to a PUD. Respondent No:46 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 27, 2021 06:06:27 am Last Seen:Apr 27, 2021 06:06:27 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Jinnet Fowles Q2.Address 7250 York Ave S, Apt 304 Q3.Comment I am writing to strongly support the opportunity to rezone 4917 Eden Avenue from PCD-1 and APD to PUD. I believe that this rezoning is a critical step on the path to creating more housing options in Edina. The preliminary plans that have been put forward demonstrate that it is feasible to begin addressing our urgent need for housing accessible to people who work in Edina and who would like to live here. The proposal is far from single family homes and makes good use of an awkwardly situated parcel of land. The density proposed is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. I ask you to vote in support of the proposed rezoning in consideration for the future of a stronger Edina. Respondent No:47 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 27, 2021 06:21:41 am Last Seen:Apr 27, 2021 06:21:41 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Margaret Kinney Q2.Address 6805 Southdale Rd Q3.Comment We need more affordable housing in Edina- hard working people who earn less than $100,000 are interested in living in Edina and the city needs to help make that happen. I am in full support of the proposed 39 units affordable housing in the development being considered at the current Perkins site. Respondent No:48 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 27, 2021 09:46:53 am Last Seen:Apr 27, 2021 09:46:53 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Benjamin Gerber Q2.Address 5821 Fairfax, Edina, Minnesota 55424 Q3.Comment I support this project and I live very close buy. I run by this spot 2-3 times a week.This will be a welcome addition to the neighborhood and increase walkability for families to experience retail/dining options. We moved to Edina from downtown to have these experiences. The height will not create issues, and I welcome new density to the area, moreover it provides a buffer with the highway. I support the high quality development proposed. Respondent No:49 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 28, 2021 11:38:53 am Last Seen:Apr 28, 2021 11:38:53 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Eliot Howard Q2.Address 4800 W 62nd st Q3.Comment We are writing to voice our enthusiastic support for the development proposed for 4917 Eden Avenue. The plan to include 39 affordable housing units is another measured but significant approach the city should support to make homes available in Edina to people of varying age, households and incomes. We find the location to be very appealing. The site is in need of redevelopment. The site is in close proximity to major roadways, an express busline, businesses, as well as lending options favorable to biking and pedestrian use. The intent of making this a mixed use property is also a positive aspect of this plan. As recent retirees and 28 year residents of Edina, we are most appreciative of city efforts to create more affordable housing in our city. Jan and Eliot Howard Respondent No:50 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 28, 2021 12:00:24 pm Last Seen:Apr 28, 2021 12:00:24 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name KIMBERLY NELSON Q2.Address 700 Olive Street, Saint Paul, MN 55130 Q3.Comment Mayor and Council Members, The North Central States Regional Council of Carpenters represents 25,000 construction workers in our area. Below are our official comments in Support of Reuter Walton re-developing 4917 Eden Ave in Edina. Thank you. April 28, 2021 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Mayor and Council Members, I am writing today in support of the Reuter Walton project for 4917 Eden Avenue in Edina. Reuter Walton is a responsible developer who hires subcontractors that hire locally. This project means thousands of work hours for carpenters and other construction trades workers. Work that will pay wages and benefits to support a middle class living. We urge the support of this project that will build housing for your community in partnership with a developer who listens to and invests in our communities. Reuter Walton is a responsible developer who listens to community feedback, and takes a thoughtful approach to their projects. We look forward to the 4917 Eden Avenue project making it through the necessary planning stages at the City of Edina. On behalf the North Central States Regional Council of Carpenters, we strongly support the project at 4917 Eden Avenue. Fraternally, Adam Duininck Director of Government Affairs Respondent No:51 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 28, 2021 12:27:46 pm Last Seen:Apr 28, 2021 12:27:46 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name carol bromer Q2.Address 6521 creek drive Q3.Comment I support rezoning 4917 Eden Avenue from its current PCD-1 and APD to PUD status to allow the site to be redeveloped for a 196 unit apartment and a restaurant. I especially support the developer's proposal to include 20% (39) of the units as affordable at 60% AMI. I also approve giving the City more flexibility in planning around the stated PUD criteria. This proposed project will meet goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan toward 1804 affordable housing units by 2030, plus creating a range of housing options at market rate, and thus reduce the carbon emissions from commuters who could now live and work in Edina. Respondent No:52 Login:Stephanie Hawkinson Email:shawkinson@edinamn.gov Responded At:Apr 28, 2021 13:15:23 pm Last Seen:Apr 28, 2021 20:00:04 pm IP Address:156.142.13.79 Q1.First and Last Name Edina Housing Foundation: Jeff Huggett, Ann Swenson, Mary Kay McNee; Jerry Gilligan, Bernadette Hornig Q2.Address Varied addresses for five Foundation Board Members Q3.Comment The East Edina Housing Foundation supports the proposed housing on the Perkins site. This area as quoted by Mayor Hovland is “a gateway to our city”. While Perkins has served our city well, the site is tired and under utilized. The inclusion of 20% affordable units at 60% AMI helps our city move forward in its commitment to additional affordable housing. The location is near the Jerry’s area for shopping and employment. It is also an easy exit/entrance to hwy 100. The density and height of this building helps make affordable housing achievable. The set back of over 500’ from residential supersedes the 300’ ordinance by over 200 feet. This new building and potential small restaurant or coffee shop will be an attractive anchor on this important corner. Respondent No:53 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 28, 2021 15:50:30 pm Last Seen:Apr 28, 2021 15:50:30 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Patricia Zona Q2.Address 5220 Eden Ave #432 Edina, Minnesota 55436 Q3.Comment Why is Perkins leaving? Did another developer make an offer too good to refuse? Was the rent raised or the taxes now too high to bare. Perkins has been a saving grace and refuge in difficult times. Dependable, reliable offering always good service and welcoming staff. Wonderful pancakes, cannot be replaced, nourishing food when weary from moving or traveling. How lucky we are to have this wonderful restaurant and now to be replaced with another (one too many) condo or apartment.) What about the traffic, congestion, noise and pollution from...You name it. I prefer quality over quantity. We have enough going on to make these decisions in such haste.. Shouldn't we be thinking long term instead of a quick short term solution with miriad of problems that come with it all. Keep on building, keep the numbers growing. When will we learn sometimes the profit isn't worth the risks? P.Z. Respondent No:54 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 28, 2021 17:46:35 pm Last Seen:Apr 28, 2021 17:46:35 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Katie Clemency Q2.Address 4604 Oak Drive Q3.Comment I am opposed to this development. There is already too much traffic at this intersection and the surrounding area. Prior luxury apartment developments are not yet fully occupied, and many more are still in progress. The “demand” by potential renters for this project is not clear nor are the benefits to the local community. And the height/density of the building clearly affects the SunnySlope and Golf Terrace Heights neighborhoods - we are suburban, not urban. And that is the lifestyle/neighborhood homeowners invested in. Respondent No:55 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 28, 2021 19:55:31 pm Last Seen:Apr 28, 2021 19:55:31 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Kellogg Olin Q2.Address 4529 Tower St., Edina, MN 55424 Q3.Comment An apartment building that tall makes absolutely no sense at that location. The area cannot handle the traffic. Nothing East of 100 is that tall. And so many apartment buildings have been built recently close to that location either on the other side of 100 or at 50th & France that there cannot be a need for more apartments. Additionally, the elementary school in that area is near capacity. It’s an area of largely single family homes that this building will tower over. Respondent No:56 Login:Sara McGrane Email:saramcgrane@hotmail.com Responded At:Apr 29, 2021 08:24:56 am Last Seen:Apr 29, 2021 15:19:49 pm IP Address:66.41.95.157 Q1.First and Last Name Sara McGrane Q2.Address 4913 W. Sunnyslope Road Q3.Comment I listened to the very lengthy Planning Commission meeting last night. It was my first--and very frustrating that over 2 hours was spent on a single home, and this massive project, that will (in my opinion) dramatically increase traffic detrimentally in our Sunnyslope neighborhood, was placed at the end of the meeting, not discussed until after 10:30pm, and neighbors were given limited time to comment. I was not aware that the Commission was monitoring how many responses were positive or negative on this site as means of whether there is community support. During pre-COVID traffic, it could take more than 2 minutes to turn out of our neighborhood. I am stunned (and disappointed) that this project was recommended to be passed. I am not in support. Respondent No:57 Login:Ann Makredes Email:amakr@msn.com Responded At:Apr 29, 2021 12:44:13 pm Last Seen:Apr 29, 2021 19:35:26 pm IP Address:75.72.144.184 Q1.First and Last Name Ann Makredes Q2.Address 4916 west Sunnyslope Road Q3.Comment I am just appalled that the planning commission approved this project last night, very late last night even though there was consensus among the members on some serious unresolved infrastructure, traffic and noise issues, not to speak of safety, outside our neighborhood today. They clearly wanted to go to bed in my opinion and were eager to terminate the discussion (I wonder if it wasn’t placed at the end of the agenda on purpose). The whole process was a farce - only Bennett was brave enough to stand by his opinions. To clarify we are not opposed to redevelopment, we just want SMART development (is a 7 story building really fitting in the neighborhood?). Traffic, noise, roads (inc bike, sidewalks and pedestrian routes) and more importantly, changes to the on/off ramps to HW100 need to be professionally engineered and planned BEFORE allowing a new development. Drawing a red line on a map and saying it needs to be addressed is just not good enough. So disappointed by the whole process and I sincerely hope that the city council members will vote smarter after May 18th hearing. Yours Sincerely, Respondent No:58 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 02, 2021 18:17:59 pm Last Seen:May 02, 2021 18:17:59 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Michaela Bounds Q2.Address 5109 valley view rd Edina 55436 Q3.Comment I would love to see a restaurant here.. however, I see no need for apartments /housing at this time. The intersection is busy and can Potentially foresee a housing crash in the near future. Respondent No:59 Login:CyndiO Email:cyndi.gustobt@gmail.com Responded At:May 03, 2021 07:08:47 am Last Seen:Apr 29, 2021 14:13:40 pm IP Address:75.73.52.38 Q1.First and Last Name Cyndi Olson Q2.Address 4808 W Sunnyslope Rd Q3.Comment I'm very disappointed that the planning commission does not enforce the existing zoning. Why have zoning if every developer can get whatever they want? The Perkins project is very pretty, but it would be just as pretty being 4 stories as it is being 7 stories. Many beautiful developments around the country are only four stories. Four stories is more appropriate for this lot. It is already on a hill. It is going to be towering over ALL of Edina with 7 stories. It will be very intrusive to the neighbors, looking into their backyards. I bet it will be one of the highest points in Edina. I believe this development needs to stay within the existing zoning regulations. Respondent No:60 Login:ConcordResident Email:julierisser39@gmail.com Responded At:May 05, 2021 09:22:14 am Last Seen:May 08, 2021 19:59:08 pm IP Address:75.73.12.236 Q1.First and Last Name Julie Risser Q2.Address 6112 Ashcroft Avenue Q3.Comment There are many concerning issues about this project and the proposed rezoning. The majority stem from a process that fails to respect the Comprehensive Plan as well as the Grandview Area Studies - including the transportation plan. I encourage all City Council members to take a look at the Planning Commission Public Hearing and consider the information that staff presented. This starts at 3:01:13. Four of slides were particularly misleading, Planner Teague's 2nd, 4th, 7th slide, and 8th slide. The 2nd slide provides an overview of the site and labels the site, Edina City Hall, and the Golf Course. It fails to mark Edina's Frank Tupa Park which includes the Grange and Cahill School. The 4th slide shows the Building Height Overlay District. Although the Perkins site has two HOD regions, HOD-4 and HOD-2 (the northwest region) the slide only had a large colorful box around HOD-4 in the code key provided in the right corner. Furthermore the circles around the parcel completely blocked the region that is HOD-2. No way for viewers to see this region. At no point in the discussion was there any talk about the HOD-2 region on the Perkins site. This information was also missing from the packet that was sent out to commissioners and available to the public. Perhaps this region is HOD-2 because it's along Eden Avenue. Across the street is Frank Tupa Park, site of the historic Grange and the Cahill School. Slides 7 and 8 were also troubling because they show a large structure that replaces the historic sites on Frank Tupa Park. Are we planning to eliminate the Grange and Cahill School? Did I miss that decision? To be honest, I did not participate in the Grandview Area Planning. When I look at the Grandview Area Plan it appears that the historic buildings are respected and remain. Indeed it looks like there is more park area. Slide 8 is really problematic. Designed by the applicant the map imagery east of where the bright red highway overlay is provided normalizes placing structures very close to the proposed highway offramp. And again - what happened to Edina's historic buildings? I contacted the source of this map - a firm - LHB - here's the link. https://www.lhbcorp.com/project/grandview-district-transportation-study/. I talked to the person who created this map to find out why historic buildings were replaced by a large structure. She noted that this was long ago. She was surprised to learn it was being used by a developer. As an Edina resident, and an art historian who has worked as a museum director, I am really concerned that city staff would use a diagram designed by a developer that does not include our historic buildings. Arguably it normalizes the proposed project by showing large buildings that don't exist. But I'm even more concerned that city staff would use this - as part of a presentation to rezone a parcel of land. I find myself wondering if members of the planning commission would have voted differently if they had seen an image that showed the Grange and the Cahill School. If these buildings are staying, when are we going to talk about the possible implications of the proposed off ramp - and the land to the west of the historic structures that will be needed for it? Rather than moving ahead with rezoning to PUD and raising the building height levels significantly - shouldn't Edina be talking to the DOT, finding out whether the off ramp is likely to happen. Addressing the fact that we now have a president who is pushing for infrastructure investment? If the DOT is going to need that land, maybe it could purchase the parcel. It looks like it might need a some of the western section of the Frank Tupa park. Could a land swap be arranged so that the City of Edina could have the western section of the Perkins parcel. It could be used to replace some of the parking that will be lost at the park. Also, pre-COVID, the City Hall parking was sometimes insufficient for events and people spilled over into the Perkins lot. This could be a really good opportunity to secure land that could help create pedestrian and bike friendly spaces. It could be a hub for celebrating Edina's history. Imagine extending Frank Tupa park - having more space near city hall for learning about Edina's history and creating pedestrian and bike friendly infrastructure. Finally it's extremely concerning that the packet and the presentation did not reveal the fact that the Perkins Parcel falls outside of the Possible Change Areas that are shown in red consistently throughout chapter 3 of the Comprehensive Plan. Thank you for considering these concerns, Julie Risser Respondent No:61 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 10:53:10 am Last Seen:May 06, 2021 10:53:10 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Caryn Kelly Q2.Address 4508 Golf Terrace Q3.Comment This part of town doesn’t have the infrastructure to manage traffic. That area already has incredible congestion! Respondent No:62 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 10:55:09 am Last Seen:May 06, 2021 10:55:09 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Robert Dillon Q2.Address 4702 sunnyside Road Q3.Comment I am against the rezoning of this property to build a high-density seven-story, 208 residence building. Too high density. Keep all these development south of cross-town that has already been designated for high density. Keep our neighbor single-family homes Respondent No:63 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 10:58:03 am Last Seen:May 06, 2021 10:58:03 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Henry Fiola Q2.Address 1008 Coventry Place Q3.Comment As a 50-plus year resident of Edina, I feel the height of this building is totally out of character for this corner of Edina. I live at Centennial Lakes. The planning and building in that area has developed that part of Edina beautifully and usefully. This is the wrong place for a modern, 7 story building. I also recognize the fact the character and needs of the community are changing, and the city has done well managing that. But this is a sore thumb. Respondent No:64 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 10:58:43 am Last Seen:May 06, 2021 10:58:43 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Gordon Stott Q2.Address 4516 Wooddale Ave, Edina, MN 55424 Q3.Comment I oppose this development on the basis that high density accommodation proposed is not in keeping with the character of the neighborhood nor is their a pressing population need for further apartment developments in Edina with many vacant units available. Areas around France Ave are already zoned for this type of development and many new units along this corridor have been recently constructed and remain vacant. Edina has no need for, and will not benefit, from this development. Respondent No:65 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 10:58:44 am Last Seen:May 06, 2021 10:58:44 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Chris Bourne Q2.Address 4627 Browndale Ave. Q3.Comment I strongly object to this project - mostly based on the massive scale. The fact that the developers need a variance and conditional use permit to build a site this large is a concern. I support ongoing development in Edina. However, something of this scale for that location is too inconsistent with the immediate area for aesthetics, noise, people density, etc. I also think this is a big safety concern for my family - primarily with my two young children. I strongly request this project is reconsidered - something 2-4 stories would have been much more palatable. Respondent No:66 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 10:59:58 am Last Seen:May 06, 2021 10:59:58 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Gerald R Weber Q2.Address 4500 Golf Terrace Q3.Comment Edina is making a mistake to place more high density residential in an area where it has already over capacity. We are going to give away the small unique neighborly town feeling. 50th is already become a Zoo with over crowding. Respondent No:67 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 11:01:35 am Last Seen:May 06, 2021 11:01:35 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Troy Eigner Q2.Address 4601 Casco Ave. Q3.Comment I'm opposed to this project for multiple reasons; we are ready have density issues in this area and I'm also not in favor of a seven story building. Respondent No:68 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 11:02:15 am Last Seen:May 06, 2021 11:02:15 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Tracy Black Q2.Address 5512 Oaklawn Ave Q3.Comment I have some concerns regarding the development at the Edina Perkins location. While I don’t oppose ‘some’ development, I do oppose a apartment/condo site that is higher than 3 or 4 floors. This is a bedroom community, not an urban area. If we had wanted to live in an area with high rises, we would have moved to the city of Minneapolis. We choose to live in Edina and pay higher taxes because the quality of life and a high rise, ( or higher rise), will cause more congestion, noise and will start creating an urban feel. I hate what has happened to the Southdale area with all the big buildings and ask you consider the thoughts and opinions of the residents who live close by, or have to drive by it every day. Thanks for considering a lifelong Edina resident’s opinion . Respondent No:69 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 11:07:22 am Last Seen:May 06, 2021 11:07:22 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Brett Severson Q2.Address 4602 Oak Dr. Edina, MN 55424 Q3.Comment The height and density of this project is extremely concerning. Seven stories in this location at the top of the hill seems extremely high for this area and would limit visibility. The amount of units here would add significant traffic to an area/intersection that already feels congested, especially in light of the four-way stop at the intersection of Wilson Rd. and Eden Ave. Additionally, access to 100 Northbound is already congested. Respondent No:70 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 11:10:17 am Last Seen:May 06, 2021 11:10:17 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Bill kelly Q2.Address 4508 Golf Terrace Q3.Comment It’s way too dense so close to residential homes! The traffic already is terrible without a high rise! Respondent No:71 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 11:10:31 am Last Seen:May 06, 2021 11:10:31 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Charlie Fee Q2.Address 5705 Deville Drive Q3.Comment Hello, Where is the data that shows another 208-unit luxury apartment building located feet from a noisy freeway has enough demand to fill it? Is this in anticipation the baby boomers are going to sell their landed homes and move into something like this? Why are we littering our city with condo building after condo building? When is enough enough? Our population hasn't grown at a considerable rate in decades. How does the city think we need more of this? The state of Minnesota almost lost a house seat in Washington because it's not growing in population like other states. I just don't see how any of this makes sense to logical thinking people. I encourage you to reconsider this vote to approve. Respondent No:72 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 11:25:37 am Last Seen:May 06, 2021 11:25:37 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Gretchen Baker Q2.Address 4800 Maple Rd Q3.Comment The proposed structure is too high for the space, especially the golf course. Please reconsider a more moderate building replacement for this space. Respondent No:73 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 11:28:53 am Last Seen:May 06, 2021 11:28:53 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Terry Lynner Q2.Address 6404 HAROLD WOODS LN, Edina Q3.Comment Why do you have PUD requirements if you don't enforce them. The PUD requirements are for the common good and the variances are about money(taxes) and favors(political). I want my elected officials to stand on principles. I am not in favor of the project but recognize the developers right to build it...but not the right to design and build it as they please. Tell them to redesign according to our rules. They will make enough money and you will be serving your constituents. Respondent No:74 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 11:36:46 am Last Seen:May 06, 2021 11:36:46 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name John Mason Q2.Address 7217 fleetwood Q3.Comment The height and density of Rezoning from PCD-1 and APD to PUD at 4917 Eden Avenue, Perkins is completely objectionable. I find the city council and planning committee to changing the identity of Edina from primarily a single family home community to dense, urban like and more transient type community. Respondent No:75 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 11:43:13 am Last Seen:May 06, 2021 11:43:13 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Ken Crowley Q2.Address 5416 Kellogg Ave Q3.Comment Hello - I am not against the development or the location, but the height seems to be an outlier for this portion of Edina. Has there been any analysis of the impact of a building of this height to Edina Country Club or Apartments on the East side of 100 (Avidor)? Thank you for consideration - my cell # is 415-816-9449. Respondent No:76 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 11:52:20 am Last Seen:May 06, 2021 11:52:20 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Matt Sznewajs Q2.Address 5305 Kellogg Ave Q3.Comment This project seems like a horrible idea and likely to wreck the communities around the new structure(s). The increased density in Edina (in addition to other recent high density projects) and the impact on the public school system is very problematic and concerning. The density is also likely to increase traffic flow in the area around the existing community center, elementary and middle schools. This project is also likely to increase congestion in east Edina generally. Furthermore the height of the building will be an eye sore to the community. This project should not move forward in any way. Any City council member who would vote to approve this project will not have my vote. Respondent No:77 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 12:03:58 pm Last Seen:May 06, 2021 12:03:58 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Mark Reilly Q2.Address 4612 Tower Street, Edina, MN Q3.Comment This corner cannot support such a large increase in population. The traffic from tenants and cars/busses going to/from Normandale as well as local residents would all be funneled to one road, pinched by highway 100 and Edina Counfry Club. Infrastructure is not close to sufficient and no space to put it, unless the developer is willing to sacrifice acreage. Respondent No:78 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 12:41:03 pm Last Seen:May 06, 2021 12:41:03 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Jean Navarro Q2.Address 5275 Grandview Square #3413 Q3.Comment The scale of this project is ridiculous. It is way to massive for the area. This area already very dense. We don’t need more. Respondent No:79 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 12:48:16 pm Last Seen:May 06, 2021 12:48:16 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Steve Gerster Q2.Address 5115 Wooddale Glen Q3.Comment I am against the change in zoning to accommodate a large multi-family complex in this area of Edina. The council should listen to its constituents who, from what I’ve been reading, are very much against this re-zoning/development. Additionally, there is not and will not, at least anytime in the foreseeable future, be the infrastructure to accommodate such a large project at that location. Please do not shove this change down the throats of this neighborhood! Thank you Respondent No:80 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 13:11:15 pm Last Seen:May 06, 2021 13:11:15 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Betsy Johnson Q2.Address 4247 Crocker Ave Q3.Comment I am not in favor of this development for many reasons. Respondent No:81 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 13:12:52 pm Last Seen:May 06, 2021 13:12:52 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Rick Aviles Q2.Address 4501 Edina Blvd Q3.Comment I reviewed the applicant submittal, and I have a few comments - seems like they want to build a apartment build and leverage a view into the country club - 7 story building at the same elevation of Perkins will create an eye sore. Its not an issue with Edina Executive Plaza because it is a lower elevation. Now if the builders want to dig down and make it the same elevation that would elevate my concerns. Doubt they would do it because it will take away the view of some of the apartments into the golf course - The idea of having stores and a restaurant on the first floor is unrealistic. Unlike Perkins, this building will not have a lot of parking options for non resident guest. There is zero foot traffic in this area so stores will find it difficult to get clients. - in general, parking is going to be nightmare, the restaurant and stores will find it difficult to get business creating long term vacancies that bring Zero revenue into the city - Please vote no on this current plan, the developer needs to rethink the approach to this space Respondent No:82 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 13:40:20 pm Last Seen:May 06, 2021 13:40:20 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Tony and Jean Navarro Q2.Address 5275 Grandview Square, Unit 3413, Edina, MN. 55436 Q3.Comment Enough is Enough! The proposed density for the Perkins site along with prior and current discussion on the site across from Hilltop will make this an unbearable congested traffic nightmare. We don't need a six or seven story building. Allowing the Avidor 55Plus development and its allowed density was another oversight by the city, why too tall?? not sure it's doing too well either? They(developer) need to get higher density-why? because they are paying such a rich price for the land the numbers don't work unless they get more units on the site. Who wins? The land seller for sure and likely the developer in time. What does Edina and its citizens win? I would like to see the analysis of where the additional increased tax money goes for all of these new large developments. I don't see anything coming back into the community that is visible to the betterment of the citizens. When does it end and become more of the town we all enjoyed and experienced for many years and is now trying to become a 'micro'politan. ('big city') with increased traffic, noise and people. We have been blessed with many positive things in this community. The high rise density our city council continues to support is NOT in the best interest of the community . Enough is Enough !!! Respondent No:83 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 13:53:36 pm Last Seen:May 06, 2021 13:53:36 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name mike post Q2.Address 5002 arden ave Q3.Comment I would like to voice my strong opposition to this project. This proposal is not in the best interests of the community on many levels, and is in excessive violation of existing codes and requirements. It is difficult to understand why the planning commission would even consider such deviations from firmly established requirements. The factors of building height, density, setbacks, traffic, noise, public safety all suggest that this proposal should be rejected. This project is not an appropriate scale for this location. Respondent No:84 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 14:08:03 pm Last Seen:May 06, 2021 14:08:03 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Roger Hauck Q2.Address 6100 Westridge Blvd Edina Q3.Comment 7 stories seems way too tall, would you consider limiting to 5 stories. Respondent No:85 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 14:15:46 pm Last Seen:May 06, 2021 14:15:46 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Diane Rice Q2.Address 5013 Bruce Ave Edina, Mn 55424 Q3.Comment You all just don’t stop. How dense can we make Edina? And the traffic on 50th is already terrible. Please, stop! Enough. It seems like we are having this discussion yearly. Do you forget the public’s view or do you think we will forget? Respondent No:86 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 14:36:14 pm Last Seen:May 06, 2021 14:36:14 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Ted Adams Q2.Address 40 years in Country Club Recently moved Q3.Comment As a 40 year member of Edina Country Club and 50 year resident of the Country Club neighborhood, I see nothing wrong with the proposed development of the Perkins site. Respondent No:87 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 14:45:27 pm Last Seen:May 06, 2021 14:45:27 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Are City Planners and Council members required to actually live in Edina?!? They must not be as if they were they would cease with these projects. This overbuilding and resulting density impact make Edina a much less desirable place to live. Enough! Q2.Address Steve Ehlers, 6600 Vernon Hills Road, Edina, MN 55436 Q3.Comment Let’s just continue to build more and more of these residential buildings and complexes, presumably in order to increase the tax base and revenue and then call the resulting density issues progress”?!? While we are at it, maybe we should also build high rises on both sides of Hwy100 and connect the two sides with skyways? Can this really be what Edina homeowners want? Or might it be just the City “Leadership” stroking their egos? Insanity!! Respondent No:88 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 15:06:58 pm Last Seen:May 06, 2021 15:06:58 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Kirsten and Meehan Q2.Address 5212 Birchcrest Drive. Q3.Comment We live directly across the highway from this area, why in the world would Edina EVER allow a 7-story building to be built right in the heart of it? I understand this is very easy on and off highway access, but that height along with that influx of people to the Vernon/Interlachen/50th thoroughfare is a terrible plan. The congestion in that space during a regular rush hour is already bad. Then you add that amount of new residences directly to that same space, why? Also, this side of Edina already has such a shortage of restaurants and hang-outs, why wouldn't you make it a more walking friendly, with bike access to shops and restaurants. Even 3 or 4-stories would be reasonable with more retail below. BUT SEVEN! Respondent No:89 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 15:20:04 pm Last Seen:May 06, 2021 15:20:04 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name PAUL REPPENHAGEN Q2.Address 4507 GOLF TERRACE Q3.Comment I feel this project will add too much density to the area and will be unnecessarily large. I'm very concerned about the added congestion, traffic, parking it will add to an already busy corner. I don't support this development. Respondent No:90 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 17:11:10 pm Last Seen:May 06, 2021 17:11:10 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name David Blue Q2.Address 6029 Kellogg Ave Q3.Comment I can’t believe that you idiots want another apartment complex in this city. What happened to Edina being a top-tier city that was the envy of all other suburbs? Both home value wise and education wise. Now we have an over crowded city with a declining education system and there is no end in sight. If this goes through and we build another apartment complex that’s going to clog our streets with traffic, overload our schools with more kids, you are going to see a lot of residents move west to Lake Minnetonka, Orono, etc. I want to find out which one of you is making money off all of this bullshit, because I know you can’t think it’s the right thing for the city or our kids. I hope you’re all happy with yourselves for turning a great town into the disaster that it is. Respondent No:91 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 18:04:49 pm Last Seen:May 06, 2021 18:04:49 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Stephanie Blendermann Q2.Address 3391 Wilds Ridge NW Prior Lake, MN Q3.Comment As a member of Edina Country Club and as we consider a move for retirement in the town of Edina, we were very disappointed in hearing that a 7 story building be considered in the location where the Perkins has now closed. This location is already in such a tight location that traffic, parking, congestion and safety should be a strong consideration. Perhaps a smaller profile would better serve the location and this beautiful area. It is our hope the city considers high density is not the answer to this beautiful location. A smaller profile may better suite the location. Your consideration is appreciated. Respondent No:92 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 22:29:02 pm Last Seen:May 06, 2021 22:29:02 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Amalia Stott Q2.Address 4516 Wooddale Avenue Q3.Comment I am writing in regard to the proposed development of the Perkins site. I am a resident of the country club neighborhood, one of Edina's many crown jewels. I am writing in opposition of the proposed plan. Edina is development happy at the moment and multi-unit happy to be more specific. Adding more density for the sake of adding more housing is not smart city planning. There are many more sites that are better suited for multi-unit housing and not every square parcel of land in this city needs to be allocated to multi-unit or even multi-purpose space. There are many new units as you know that have been or are being erected at 44th and France, 50th and France, along Valley View Road and France Avenue and Xerxes near Southdale. Edina is a city of families and one of those reasons is because of it's schools. The city council should be looking at the declining enrollment of students at EPS and doing all it can to foster a city that creates an enviroment for residents to want to stay in EPS - not to continue to drive out families and students by overcrowding schools and putting a drain on district resources. I appreciate that you may believe that more tax dollars will be flowing back to the schools but given that many of the new multi-units are apartments these residents actually don't contribute to the tax base. So, please, please, please I emplore you to consider not to over develop the Perkins site. Build a nice family restaurant that has better food than Perkins, perhaps more green space for our resident bald eagles, or some trees to help us all breathe cleaner air. Perhaps you would consider a development with 20-30 reasonably priced (not $750K+) town homes for 55+ individuals who are gettting priced out of this city. Thank you for your consideration of my letter. Respondent No:93 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 07, 2021 07:50:54 am Last Seen:May 07, 2021 07:50:54 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Bryan Peterson Q2.Address 5656 woodcrest drive Q3.Comment I oppose this redevelopment proposal. The continued build up of these massive buildings along the 50th corridor is eroding the family friendly neighborhood feel in Edina. It is creating traffic congestion, less green space along with other environment issues, which are all counter intuitive to what Edina is. Edina should not be turning into a apartment Mecca, which sadly is happening. This proposal is another example of the “sell out” proposals being moved forward by the city council to grab more tax revenue. Our small town feel city is eroding with every new apartment complex that is being built. We must stop this madness! Respondent No:94 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 07, 2021 08:14:49 am Last Seen:May 07, 2021 08:14:49 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Danielle Arlowe Q2.Address 4818 Golf Terrace, Edina, MN 55424 Q3.Comment 1) highway / pedestrian / sound issue: I am concerned with the increase in pedestrian traffic this will create without a comprehensive plan to address the danger of having a very busy highway next to a busy pedestrian walkway and merely a short chain link fence separating the two. It's only a matter of time before a car or truck flies off the highway and kills a pedestrian. In the past 12 months, there have been several highway crashes (including a semi truck flying up an embankment and hitting a nearby pedestrian bridge) within 1/4 mile of this project. Part of this development, if it is to proceed, should be a complete re-working of the pedestrian / highway proximity issue and the construction of a highway wall. The builder should bear or split the cost with the state of an attractive-as-possible wall to be constructed on the East side of highway 100 between 50th and Highway 62. This is the ONLY residential section of Highway 100 from where it starts in Coon Rapids to where it ends in Bloomington that doesn't have a sound wall. To build a huge building that will house hundreds of people, plus commercial space, without addressing the current (and increased by the development) pedestrian danger and sound / light / air pollution of the highway mere feet away from the proposed project is irresponsible. 2) Devaluation of nearby residential neighborhood: Those of us with extremely expensive homes who pay a tremendous amount in state income tax and property taxes are concerned that this project will reduce our property's value unless something major being done to offset the downgrade. While I'm sure the developers will argue that a new building would be much prettier than Perkins, the reality is that without a significant increase in green space or pretty public walkways, the building will make an already congested area much less desirable to live in. Thank you. Respondent No:95 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 07, 2021 08:50:43 am Last Seen:May 07, 2021 08:50:43 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name James Nasby Q2.Address 5809 Vernon Lane Edina, MN 55436 Q3.Comment I moved to Edina for the quality of the school system, ease of shopping and reasonable traffic flow. Why are we building numerous high rise condos and apartments that will have a negative effect on all my reasons for choosing Edina as my home. The number of births in this country is the lowest level in 60 years. Do we need to make space for the Southern border immigrants? I think the Democratic leaders in Minnesota at the local and state level are acting like idiots! Respondent No:96 Login:ConcordResident Email:julierisser39@gmail.com Responded At:May 08, 2021 13:42:40 pm Last Seen:May 08, 2021 19:59:08 pm IP Address:75.73.12.236 Q1.First and Last Name Julie Risser Q2.Address 6112 Ashcroft Avenue Q3.Comment It was so sobering to see how the historic buildings on Frank Tupa Park were completely ignored by Edina staff during their presentation to the Planning Commission advocating to rezone the Perkins parcel to PUD. It seemed incredibly insensitive to ignore the fact that across the street stands the Grange, a building directly connected to Black pioneer history and the Yancey family. I have done a little digging. I have a better understanding why there was such a bizarre comfort level. The Grange, Black pioneer history, and Yancey family contributions are consistently marginalized through content provided by the Edina Historical Society - both website and on-site content. On site, the Yancey name is spelled "Yancy" - and there is no actually explanation of the significance of the Yancey family. "Yancy" appears in the following sentence: "In 1935 the ground lease for the property expired, and the Grange Hall was moved to a new site on the old Yancy homestead on Normandale Road." If you look at the website, the Edina Historical Society fails to mention B.C. Yancey or the Yancey family on its page for the Grange. https://www.edinamn.gov/748/Grange-Hall People need to go to the St. Louis Park Historical Society to learn "The new Grange site was owned by a member of the Yancey family, one of the 16 black families that lived in Edina from the end of the Civil War until the late 30s, when they moved to Minneapolis." http://slphistory.org/grange/ Although there were 16 black families in Edina, and the Yancey's provided land for the Grange, don't go looking for any images of Black people on the signage by the Grange. Two photographs are identified - they are of James A. Bull and Oliver H. Kelley. Yes there is logic in including images of these two people. But the accompanying images cement the inaccurate, and yes racist, notion that only white people were settlers here. There is the photo of "Meeting in Grange Hall, c. 1920, the print "Typical Grange Hall interior with officers in position, 1874, and there is "Meeting of Grangers, 1873." Also on the site is a large banner announcing "Historic Cahill Camps June-August www.edinahistoricalsociety.org - The Grange which is architecturally a much more interesting building will likely draw young students' attention - some may read the signage and look at the images. The take away is that Edina was created by white people. This is teaching racism. That onsite signage is old and faded. It needs to be replaced. It would be good to do that before this years summer camps begin. The location of the Grange, on Yancey land, is key to its historical significance - as is its close proximity to City Hall. Yes, you can argue that the building was moved to its current site long after B.C. Yancey donated land for it. But it is the last remaining physical connection to B.C. Yancey, and the role that Black pioneers played in creating Edina. In closing, the preservation plan for the Grange includes this point: "As a matter of policy, the City of Edina will consider the effects of its projects on city-owned properties designated as Edina Heritage Landmarks. The Edina Park Board shall also give the Heritage Preservation Board (HPB) a reasonable opportunity to review for appropriateness all plans for routine maintenance, repairs, and improvements at Frank Tupa Park. The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties are the required basis for the HPB’s recommendations." I realize that the Perkin's property is not a "City-Owned" property. But the spirit of this point is that the City will look out for its heritage sites. In keeping with this spirit, the City of Edina should allow the Heritage Preservation Board to respond to this proposal. Of course this would take time, and once a project is submitted, the clock starts running. The most logical course of action is to deny rezoning to PUD. The Grange is likely the most important heritage landmark in the city. But as the St. Louis Park Historical Society website reveals, its significance goes beyond Edina's borders. Thank you for your consideration. Respondent No:97 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 09, 2021 20:14:50 pm Last Seen:May 09, 2021 20:14:50 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Jack kennefick Q2.Address 5022 Arden avenue Q3.Comment Driving north on Arden and turning left on 50th street is becoming increasingly difficult with all the new building in the area. We really don’t need more density. The city seems intent on building more condos/apartments and narrowing the streets. Bigger is not always better. I’ve lived on Arden for more than 30yrs so I’ve witnessed this trend over many years. It seems like building has gotten really out of hand in the last few years. Respondent No:98 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 10, 2021 09:24:26 am Last Seen:May 10, 2021 09:24:26 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Michael Ramme Q2.Address 6401 McCauley Circle Edina, MN Q3.Comment As a resident of Edina and active participant in this community, I must say that I am opposed to the overall plans for this development. The traffic impact on Eden Avenue that this will generate is too much for the current infrastructure to bear and will be adding to an already over trafficked area on Eden Ave. Take a moment and look at the current traffic constraints during the schools days at Our Lady of Grace and peak times for traffic flow, it is simply too much already. Furthermore, with OLG being so close, do we really want all this traffic adjacent to a children’s educational institution? No, we do not. With the already occupied Avidor and plans for the City owner lot at Eden and Arcadia, traffic is currently stressed to the maximum capacity and will only get worse and much more unsafe for the schools, children and pedestrians in general. Beyond traffic, the height of the proposed development simply exceeds what the site should be guided for and exceeds all adjacent properties in the immediate area as well. Have shadow studies been done to see the impact on the Edina Country Club? The impact on site shadows over the highway? Site lines coming off of Wilson road will be greatly impacted as well. I would like to see the shadow studies performed and site lines from driving north and south on Wilson and east/west on Eden Ave and 50th as well. The overall number of apartment units the City has brought on in recent years is enough the fulfill the current demand and enough to provide an adequate number of affordable units within the City. I am for change and for redevelopment, however for mass density on a constrained site, which will negatively impair an already burgeoning traffic and safety concern I’m this immediate area. Please consider all these factors while reviewing the developers proposal and when thinking about the future of our City. Thank you. Respondent No:99 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 10, 2021 10:19:05 am Last Seen:May 10, 2021 10:19:05 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Peter Theirl Q2.Address 4700 Lakeview Drive Q3.Comment I am sure ReuterWalton has bunch of data showing there will be minimal or even favorable impact to the community by approving the rezoning of this site. I don't believe it and, as a nearby resident who utilizes Willson Road daily, I am strongly opposed to this project. A 7 seven story building on that site with be a massive eyesore. The residential units down by Southdale make sense becausee it is a commercial area with nearby similar buildings (the Westin, etc). A building that tall just doesn't fit on that site. On a side note, the last thing Edina needs is another coffee shop. In addition (and I am sure the traffic studies say otherwise), at 208 residential units with a couple cars in each unit all leaving and returning at the same time during a M-F workweek, I don't see how we don't have massive traffic issues at that intersection. Finally, what is the definition of luxury apartments? Who will be responsible in the medium-long term of keeping them luxury? The use of this site for an apartment building is unnecessary and will be a headache and hassle to residents using Willson and Eden Road. Respondent No:100 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 10, 2021 17:55:10 pm Last Seen:May 10, 2021 17:55:10 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Rachel Pollock Q2.Address 6521 Polar Circle, Edina Q3.Comment I oppose this rezoning. This building is too tall given the location, where no neighboring buildings come close to this height. Additionally, I do not believe City Council has given due consideration to the location of the Grange Hall and Old Cahill school across the road from this development. The 7-story height of this building will dominate over the heights of some of Edina's most precious heritage resources. The building will be built right to the property line of Eden Avenue, whereas a greater setback might provide more harmonious co-existence with Grange Hall and Old Cahill School across the street. Additionally, it appears that the parking lot egress for this building will be directly across the street from the limited parking for Old Cahill School and Grange Hall, causing a dangerous traffic situation for those visitors to the school who must back out to exit the parking stalls. I would ask the Council to consider whether this use is consistent with existing uses in the area and whether this will result in harm to Edina's precious heritage resources. Respondent No: 101 Login: Anonymous Email: n/a 01.First and Last Name 02.Address 03.Comment Gloria Horns Responded At: May 11, 2021 11:50:10 am 4905 W. Sunnyslope Rd. I am opposed to this project. I am concerned that (1) the local market is over saturated with apartments (2) this project is not near any major public transportation lines and will over stress the local access infrastructure (increased traffic, local street congestion etc.) (3) this property should be preserved for a more important potential community use. THE LOCAL MARKET IS OVERSATURATED: After the last zoom I looked at apartment vacancies in the area. I looked at buildings with four or more units which are served by major public transportation main arteries. Vacancies I counted: Excelsior Blvd corridor 186 vacant units 16 units at 3439 List Pl 49 units at Axon Green 3140 Chowen 24 units at The Calhoun Greenway 3144 Chowen 13 units at Ellipse on Excelsior and E2 3920 Excelsior Blvd 9 units at Minikahda Court 3504 Minikahda Ct 7 units at Excelsior and Grand 3820 Grand Pkwy 68 units at Era on Excelsior 6860 Excelsior Blvd Hwy 7/Hwy 100 Interchange 85 vacant units 15 units at Cityscape Apts 5707 Hwy 7 35 units at The Camerata 5600 Camerata Way 15 units at The Adagio 5655 W. 35th St 9 units at Harmony Vista 5650 W 36th St 11 units at Paek Towers 4820 Hwy 7 France Ave/York Ave corridor 113 vacant units 12 units at Nolan Mains 3945 Market St 4 units at Ewing Place 5052 Ewing Ave. So. 18 units at The Edina Towers 6400 Barrie Rd. 4 units at Astor Place of Edina 6455 York Ave So 11 units at Onyx Edina 5725 York Ave So. 13 units at Cedars of Edina Apts 7340 Gallager Dr Continue to page 2 Hwy 494/Hwy 100 interchange 137 vacant units 29 units at Luxemberg Apts 5109 W. 82nd St. 12 units at The Preserve at Normandale Lake 8101 Normandale Lake 3 units at Normandale Lake Estates 5255 W. 82nd St 14 units at The Tarnhill 5200 W. 102 St. 14 units at Bristol Village 7301 Bristol Village Dr. 19 units at Hampshire Hill 10660 Hampshire Ave. 15 units at Pebblebrook Flats 9801 Harrison Rd. 5 units at France 98 981 Drew Ave. So. 26 units at Genesee 805( Penn Ave. So shortly after the last zoom meeting I counted well over 500 vacant units in buildings with 4 units or more located just a few miles away. In addition all these units are on major public transit lines. Building yet another 200 plus unit development which is NOT on a major public transit line makes no sense. INSUFFICIENT PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Correct me if I’m wrong (and I’m no expert on public transportation in Edina) but I believe this property is only accessible by one bus route which runs east/west. There is no north/south route available. I do not know the frequency of runs on the east/west route but I rarely see buses on this route. It is not a major artery. This is wholly insufficient for a 200 plus unit apartment complex. This makes this proposal the antithesis of green planning. POTENTIAL HIGHER AND BETTER USE IF THIS SITE AS A COMMUNITY SPACE This property should be preserved for a future community purposes space. The Edina City Hall nearby houses multiple departments and it will not be long before Edina city services outgrow the building and a new site will be needed to expand. This Eden Ave site would be ideal to create a new multipurpose community services building to house the city services expansion and create a multipurpose community space. A new fire station is planned for the southwest corner of the Hwy 100/Eden Ave intersection. The historic Grange Hall is nearby across Eden Ave. A community center at this Eden Ave location would make a perfect addition to an Edina “community district” to incorporate city services, police, fire and community meeting space in a historic setting....after all this is area where Edina was founded. In a few years this site will be needed for a better use: to serve the whole community! Please let me know if I can clarify any points. Below are two links to articles regarding the apartment vacancy rates in the Twin Cities metro area and the Edina fire services article from the Sun Current: http://e.startribune.com/Olive/ODN/StarTribune/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=MST%2F2021%2F02%2F25& entity=Ar02900&sk=4A965A80&mode=text AND https://www.hometownsource.com/sun_current/community/two-new-fire-stations-recommended-for- edina/article_73916cea-cf2a-11e9-be17-435ef367828c.html (This link refers to the New Fire Station Needed in Edina. The link is to the Sun Current article 9/6/2019 detailing that recommendation. A diagram in the article indicates there is a proposal to locate a new fire house on the southwest corner of the Eden Ave/Hwy 100/ Grange Rd intersection. Rather than locate apartments on the Perkins site would it make more sense to save the site for an expanded City Hall “community district” facility to include a new administrative building/community center on that site which would allow for an expanded police station in the current City Hall building?) EdinaMN.gov 1 8 Site EdinaMN.gov 2 Site EdinaMN.gov 3 Site EdinaMN.gov 30 Code Requires a 304’ setback (4 times the height of the 76’ tall building) Memorandum TO: City of Edina City Council, Planning Commissioners, and Planning Staff COPY: Nick Walton & Kyle Brasser – Reuter Walton, Carol Lansing – Faegre Drinker Mike Kyrch & Jeff Ellingson – BKV Group FROM: Chris Palkowitsch, AIA – BKV Group DATE: 3/29/2021 RE: 4917 Eden Avenue Redevelopment – Preliminary Development Application Reuter Walton, with BKV Group, is proposing a new mixed-use, multi-family development for 4917 Eden Avenue. The site is located at the southwest corner of Eden Avenue, Willson Road, and Grange Road. This site is 2.08 acres (90,553 SF) and is currently occupied by the Perkins Restaurant. We are proposing a seven-story building with 208 residential units and a 3,700 SF restaurant. Twenty percent of the units will be affordable to families earning 60% AMI, in accordance with the City of Edina affordable housing policy. Based on input received through the concept design meetings with Planning Commission and City Council, a portion of the west side of the site will be reserved for a potential future off-ramp and frontage road from Highway 100. Reuter Walton Experience Reuter Walton Development is a Twin-Cities based real estate developer. We specialize in developing innovative, sustainable properties in the multifamily, student housing, hospitality, and commercial sectors. Our current development focus is multifamily housing. In the past 15 years, Reuter Walton has developed 32 ground-up developments throughout the Twin Cities metro area. Our development approach is collaborative and forward-thinking, with an eye for detail and efficiency. Our team is committed to ensuring each project aligns with unique community needs and values, delivering lasting benefits to residents, investors and communities alike. Some recently completed developments: ·The Asher apartments – 1125 Lagoon Ave S, Minneapolis. 175 apartment units and 5,000 SF of commercial/retail space ·Sora Apartments – 600 5th Ave S, Minneapolis – 125 apartment units and 3,200 SF of skyway connected commercial/retail space ·The Donegan – 241 Kellogg Blvd – 93 apartment units in Lowertown St. Paul ·Marquee Apartments – 1400 Nicollet Ave, Minneapolis. 231 apartment units and 10,000 SF of commercial/retail space ·Cordelle Apartments – 84 Water Street W, St. Paul – 136 apartment units · Luna – Riverside Avenue, Minneapolis – 85 apartment units Current projects under construction: · 200 12th Ave S (to be named) – 225 apartment units in the Mill District of Minneapolis – opening June 2022 · The Isaac – 2720 Fairview Ave, Roseville, MN - 127 apartment units in Roseville, MN – opening Fall 2021 · The Shale – 4757 Hiawatha Ave, Minneapolis – 85 apartment units – opening summer 2021 · Fairview & University – 243 apartment units located along the Green Line in St. Paul – opening summer 2022 Site & Zoning Currently the site is zoned PCD-1 (Planned Commercial District) and APD (Automobile Parking District). The future land use designation for the site in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan is Mixed- Use Center (Grandview area). See Table 3.6 for Grandview information related to the MXC future land use category. The table sets forth density and intensity guidance of 20-100 units per acre. This proposal is within the comprehensive plan guidelines at 100 units per acre. Edina Comprehensive Plan (Table 3.6) We propose to rezone the site as a Planned Unit Development District (PUD). This will allow the development team an opportunity to work collaboratively with the City and the community to create the best project for the site. For the residential portion of the building, we are proposing 277 below grade structured parking stalls and 8 stalls at grade, for a total of 285. 29 additional surface stalls are proposed for the restaurant on the west side of the site. Zoning code requires 1.75 stalls per unit with one enclosed space per unit and .75 exposed spaces per unit. Based on Reuter Walton’s experience with multiple developments of similar scale, we are proposing 1.37 stalls per unit. We believe this will adequality park the building. We are proposing a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 2.52 with 228,382 SF in 7 stories of building above grade. The comprehensive plan does not establish density goals based on FAR but, as noted above, the project is consistent with the residential density guidance of the comprehensive plan of 20 – 100 units per acre. The project site is unique in that it is bordered by highway and MnDOT land, broad local rights-of-way, parking lots and the golf course. The expansive open space surrounding the site will mitigate the impact of the proposed FAR. Additionally, Reuter Walton would like to acquire the triangular piece of MnDOT land to the north of the site and make it part of the development. If this 8,300 SF is added to the current site, 90,553 SF, the FAR would be reduced to 2.31. Development + Site Impacts Through the Sketch Plan Review process, we received feedback from the Planning Commission and City Council to preserve the west side of the site for the potential future off-ramp and frontage road. The location of this roadway is roughly determined by the August 31, 2016 Grandview Transportation Study. The 2016 Study creates frontage roads on the east side and west side of Highway 100 that connect directly to redesigned on and off ramps from the Highway. In response to the direction we received, we have omitted the 4 story, 52,000 SF office building that was presented as an option in the sketch plans. Pending construction of the off- ramp and frontage road, the west portion of the site will be maintained as landscaped green space. Project Design The design of the project takes into consideration the Community Design Guidelines of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Plan notes that, “[a]s a largely developed city, Edina’s future growth will be built on infill and redevelopment sites and will need to fit in, improving the character of surrounding areas.” The Plan includes the following overall principles to guide redevelopment. Chapter 3 Design Principles 1. Design buildings with an interesting and varied pedestrian-scaled street frontage, as expressed through building massing, façade articulation, materials, and details. 2. Recognize that diverse architectural styles can be employed to achieve city-building goals. 3. Position buildings to fit with their existing and/or planned context by facing and complementing adjacent streets, parks and open spaces. 4. Locate and orient vehicle parking, vehicular access, service areas and utilities to minimize their visual impact on the property and on adjacent/surrounding properties, without compromising the safety and attractiveness of adjacent streets, parks, and open spaces. 5. Regulate scale, massing, and height to provide complementary transitions to adjacent sites and nearby neighborhoods and areas. The project is being designed to create a positive impact for the community through the redevelopment of the site to a high quality visual, pedestrian, resident, employee, and patron experience. The seven-story residence is V-shaped and is open toward the Edina Country Club Golf Course, creating a building that is connected to and relates to the open space of the golf course. The massing of the housing building is broken up by a copper lined glassy link between the two primary housing bars of the building. The top floor of the building is stepped back on the primary street facades to lessen the impact of the building’s height. The main corner of the building is at the intersection of the Eden Avenue, Willson Road, and Grange Road. The building is set back from this corner to allow for an Art Plaza. This corner area also serves as the primary residence entry. It is defined by the two-story veranda and copper- lined vehicle entry portal. The veranda concept was designed to complement the two-story entry fin of City Hall. Additionally, the veranda creates a large “front porch” for this building, creating a strong pedestrian presence and design reference to the single-family homes around the golf course. Vehicle access into the two-level, below grade parking garage is south on Willson Road, utilizing the naturally low side of the site to minimize surface ramping. The project restaurant is located on the northwest corner of the project facing Eden Avenue. It has a surface parking lot with 29 stalls for the restaurant (26 when connected to the future off ramp/frontage road). The design of the building features an active and enjoyable pedestrian experience with walk-up units and robust landscaping wrapping around the project. On site stormwater management will be improved by the project. Additionally, the project includes a large, below grade storm water tank that will control the rate of discharge and filter the storm water. The roof of the housing building will feature a roof top patio, garden boxes for the residents, and will be solar ready for a photovoltaic array. Additionally, we have provided a list of our sustainable features in the sustainability questionnaire. The exterior design of the apartment building has been influenced by nearby residents and other community stake holders. The design team initially completed a design that had a more modern aesthetic inspired by new buildings in Edina. In response to the feedback we received, Reuter Walton had the design team create a more contextual design based on buildings and homes in the area. The design team started by reviewing local context examples in the Grandview area, near 50th & France and homes in the Sunny Slope neighborhood and around the gold course. The current design incorporates traditional and historic elements of the local Edina context into an updated and refined design concept. The building features buff stone at the first two levels and at the veranda delineating a strong base. The buff stone was selected to complement the stone on City Hall. Similar to City Hall, copper panels are utilized on the building as an accent material, placed on the underside of the veranda and at the vehicle entry portal to create richness within the design. Copper is also used on the building trellises, the glassy link, and light fixtures. The building has white brick as a primary material from levels 3-6. The brick features additional detail at the capitals and at the columns. The mid-gray painted material will be cement board siding and trim. Select Specific Design Items that Meet the Intent of the 2040 Guidelines Pedestrian Friendly Focus a) Interesting and active street edges with the main entries and walk-up units. b) New sidewalks with boulevards separating pedestrians from the street edge. c) Incorporation of an Art Plaza at the corner Eden Avenue, Willson Road, and Grange Road d) Robust and interesting landscaping and vegetation. e) Primarily enclosed and below grade parking with surface space for convenience and drop offs. Building Placement & Design a) The building is located near the street edges but set back to allow for additional greenspace. b) The building is designed to meet the primary corner with a visually distinct and attractive building, with a two-story veranda wrapping the corner and a stepping back of the building above. c) Windows and entries are located throughout the street facing facades. Façade Articulation a) The facades of the buildings clearly articulate the base, middle and top. b) The drop-off area for the housing is clearly defined and integrated into the veranda with a well detailed and appointed portal. c) The building façade is broken up into smaller masses through stepbacks and material articulation. Building Height Transition a) The building is seven stories tall. At the intersection of the Eden Avenue, Willson Road, and Grange Road, the height of the building and massing are broken up by the two- story corner veranda and the stepback at the top level. The top-level stepback continues along Eden Ave on the north elevation and is also on the west elevation. Schedule This project went through Sketch Plan Review with the Planning Commission and City Council in January 2021. A meeting was held with neighbors on 2/18/21 to review the project and hear their thoughts. An additional neighborhood meeting will be held in the future after the traffic study has been completed. Upcoming steps are the Preliminary Development Review meetings and the Final Development Review submittal and meetings. Reuter Walton is working toward a closing deadline of August 2021 for acquisition of the site. Construction of the project is anticipated to start in November of 2021 and last 16-18 months. [End of Memo] G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture B K V R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S TR U C TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:27:10 PMAuthor Checker 2286-05 G100 COVER SHEET 4917 EDEN AVE 4917 EDEN AVE 4917 EDEN AVE (EDINA, MN) REUTER WALTON PROJECT LOCATION RENDERING PROJECT TEAMPROJECT SUMMARY (UNIT MATRIX) Architect: Chris Palkowitsch & Mike Krych Boarman Kroos Vogel Group, Inc 222 North Second Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Phone: 612.339.3752 Fax: 612.339.6212 Contact: Architect's Name OWNER / APPLICANT: NICK WALTON OWNER / APPLICANT : REUTER WALTON ADDRESS 1710 W Lake St, Minneapolis, MN 55408 Phone: 612-823-3489 Contact: PERSON Civil: MICHAEL J. ST. MARTIN, PE (MN, WI) COMPANY NAME : Loucks ADDRESS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 Phon 763.496.6713 |C 612.237.8532 Contact: Civil Engineer's Name Landscape: Brady Halverson Boarman Kroos Vogel Group, Inc 222 North Second Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Phone: 612.339.3752 Fax: 612.339.6212 Contact: Landscape Architect's Name Structural Engineering: Lionel Dayton Boarman Kroos Vogel Group, Inc 222 North Second Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Phone: 612.339.3752 Fax: 612.339.6212 Contact: Structural Engineer's Name UNIT MIX - RENTABLE AREA UNIT TYPE UNIT AREA COUNT # RENTABLE / TOTAL AREA UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF 67 46918 SF UNIT A1.1 - 1 BED 746 SF 1 746 SF UNIT A2 - 1 BED 706 SF 7 4941 SF UNIT A2.1 - 1 BED 680 SF 7 4759 SF UNIT A3 - 1 BED 724 SF 11 7966 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF 52 55640 SF UNIT B2 - 2 BED 1060 SF 12 12714 SF UNIT B3 - 2 BED 1036 SF 7 7253 SF UNIT B4 - 2 BED 1161 SF 5 5807 SF UNIT BD1 - 2 BED DEN 1204 SF 6 7221 SF UNIT BD2 - 2 BED DEN 1201 SF 6 7206 SF UNIT BD3 - 2 BED DEN 1203 SF 4 4810 SF UNIT BD4 - 2 BED DEN 1247 SF 4 4990 SF UNIT PH1 - PENTHOUSE 1496 SF 2 2992 SF UNIT PH2 - PENTHOUSE 1448 SF 1 1448 SF UNIT PH3 - PENTHOUSE 1486 SF 1 1486 SF UNIT PH4 - PENTHOUSE 1750 SF 1 1737 SF UNIT PH5 - PENTHOUSE 1694 SF 1 1694 SF UNIT PH6 - PENTHOUSE 1726 SF 1 1726 SF UNIT S1 - ALCOVE 572 SF 12 6863 SF TOTAL: 208 188918 SF SITE ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE 15 18 15 15 22 18 10 3 6 3 3 1 16 3 LOUCKS W:\2021\21081\CADD DATA\SURVEY\_dwg Sheet Files\21081-ALTAPlotted: 03 /12 / 2021 5:19 PM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD QUALIFICATION EDEN AVENUE PROJECT 4917 EDEN AVENUE EDINA, MN 55424 BKV GROUP 222 NORTH 2ND STREET SUITE 101 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 N SCALE IN FEET 0 #### BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 1 OF 1 03/12/21 SURVEY ISSUED SITE License No. Date I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. VICINITY MAP Field Crew Max L. Stanislowski - PLS 48988 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.21081 MLS KMM MLS MJA 03/12/21 SCALE IN FEET 0 #### (Per Commonwealth Title Insurance Company Commitment No. 207679 dated April 4, 2005.) Tracts A and C, Registered Land Survey No. 1501 Hennepin County, Minnesota. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED N SPOT ELEVATION SIGN CATCH BASIN CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UTILITY MANHOLE GAS METER HAND HOLE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE YARD LIGHT FLAG POLE GUARD POST LOCUST OAK SPRUCE COTTONWOOD MAPLE CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS TREE OVERHEAD UTILITY MISC FRUIT POST INDICATOR VALVE ELEV @ THRESHOLD GUARDRAIL ROOF DRAIN TREE LINE TRENCH DRAIN PARKING STALL COUNT DISABLED PARKING STALLTOP OF CURB SET 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT, MARKED "LS 48988" FOUND OPEN IRON MONUMENT FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT FOUND REBAR RESTRICTED ACCESS BUILDING SETBACK LINE PARKING SETBACK LINE AIR CONDITIONING UNIT TOP NUT HYDRANT CHAIN LINK FENCE WOOD FENCE 1 SCHEDULE B II ITEM 2 RETAINING WALL SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE NO PARKING FIRE CONNECTION CURB CUT MAPPED STORM SEWER MAPPED SANITARY SEWER MAPPED WATERMAIN ACCESS POST VENT LIGHT POLE SURVEY LEGEND Match Line (See Left) Matc h L i n e (See L e f t ) 1.This survey was performed without the benefit of a Title Commitment. There may or may not be easements of record encumbering this property. 2.The bearings for this survey are based on the Registered Land Survey No. 1501. Benchmark: GISD Station #11468 KIN MNDT; Located in the N sidewalk of Eden Ave. Bridge No. 27029 over Hwy. 100, 21.1 Ft. N-NW of Eden Ave. Elevation = 938.24 (NGVD 29) Site Benchmark: Top nut of hydrant; Located on N side of Wilson Rd. approximately 220 Ft. SW'ly of the SE corner of the site. Elevation = 918.48 (NGVD 29) 3.Trees shown hereon are measured at breast height. 4.The Gross land area is 97,452 +/- square feet or 2.24 +/- acres. 5.Snow and ice conditions during winter months may obscure otherwise visible evidence of on site improvements and/or utilities. 6.We have shown underground utilities on and/or serving the surveyed property per Gopher State One-Call Ticket Nos. 210540713 and 210540720. The following utilities and municipalities were notified: ARVIG (218)346-5500 CITY OF EDINA (952)826-0375 COMCAST (800)778-9140 CENTURYLINK (800)778-9140 MCI (800)624-9675 MASTEC NORTH AMERICA, INC.(612)258-4222 CENTER POINT ENERGY (608)223-2014 MNDOT (651)366-5750 XCEL ENERGY (800)848-7558 ZAYO BANDWIDTH (888)267-1063 i.Utility operators do not consistently respond to locate requests through the Gopher State One Call service for surveying purposes such as this. Those utility operators that do respond, often will not locate utilities from their main line to the customer's structure or facility. They consider those utilities “private” installations that are outside their jurisdiction. These “private” utilities on the surveyed property or adjoining properties, may not be located since most operators will not mark such "private" utilities. A private utility locator may be contacted to investigate these utilities further, if requested by the client. ii.Maps provided by those notified above, either along with a field location or in lieu of such a location, are very often inaccurate or inconclusive. EXTREME CAUTION MUST BE EXERCISED BEFORE AN EXCAVATION TAKES PLACE ON OR NEAR THIS SITE. BEFORE DIGGING, YOU ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE AT 811 or (651) 454-0002. SURVEY REPORT NO PARKING2 12.0'SERVICE DRIVEWAY DROP OFF EDEN AVE. BUILDING FFE=935.50 GFE=925.00 R 45' 13 16 R 45' R 69' R 21' R 10' R 5' COURTYARD, PATIO/AMENITY AREA (SEE LANDSCAPE) CONCRETE TRANSFORMER PAD (COORD. WITH MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL) 18.0'18.0' 8.5'8.5' DOG PARK (SEE LANDSCAPE) ACCESSIBLE STALL, SIGNS, STRIPING, ETC. TYP. - (SEE DETAIL) RETAINING WALL W/ FENCE WHERE WALL IS OVER 2.5' TALL (SEE GRADING PLAN & LANDSCAPE ) FLAT CURB W/ 3' TAPERS (SEE DETAIL) FENCE (SEE LANDSCAPE) HEAVY-DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP. (SEE DETAIL) FUTURE B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP. (SEE MNDOT) FUTURE HEAVY-DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) FUTURE EXIT RAMP (COORDINATE WITH CITY / MNDOT) CONCRETE SIDEWALK (SEE DETAIL) LOADING ZONE FUTURE DRIVEWAY POOL (SEE LANDSCAPE) 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' GROUND LEVEL RESTAURANT (SEE ARCH.) ALTERNATE OUTDOOR SPACE (SEE ARCH.) RETAINING WALL W/ FENCE WHERE WALL IS OVER 2.5' TALL (SEE GRADING PLAN & LANDSCAPE ) 5.0' 5.0' 10.0' 10.0' 15.0' 15.0' 10.0' 10.0' 10.0' BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP. (SEE DETAIL) BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (MATCH EXISTING SECTION) BITUMINOUS TRAIL (MATCH EXISTING SECTION) B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP. (SEE DETAIL) CONCRETE SIDEWALK (SEE DETAIL) 6.0' CONCRETE SIDEWALK (SEE DETAIL) BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (MATCH EXISTING SECTION) SCULPTURE (SEE LANDSCAPE) 24.0' HEAVY-DUTY CONCRETE APRON (SEE DETAIL) B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP. (SEE DETAIL) CONCRETE RISERS W/ RAILING (SEE GRADING, ARCHITECTURAL, & STRUCTURAL) CONCRETE RISERS W/ RAILING (SEE GRADING, ARCHITECTURAL, & STRUCTURAL) COURTYARD CONCRETE SIDEWALK (SEE DETAIL) 6 HEAVY-DUTY CONCRETE APRON (SEE DETAIL) HEAVY-DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) RETAINING WALL W/ FENCE WHERE WALL IS OVER 2.5' TALL (SEE GRADING PLAN & LANDSCAPE )R 77' R 53' 24.0' 9.0' 18.0' 24.0' 20.0' 9.0' EXISTING MNDOT CONCRETE RETAINING WALL R 5' R 5' R 5' R 5' R 5' R 5' 4.9' FLUSH CURB 9' TAPER 10' TAPER HEAVY-DUTY CONCRETE APRON (SEE DETAIL) SERVICE D R I V E W A Y 6 73 Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Boarman Kroos Vogel Group Inc. EOE License Number I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional under the laws of the State of Minnesota.BKVTB-30x42Engineer Date XX/XX/XXXX24440 Michael J. St. Martin, PE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 21081.00 © 2016 BKV Group, Inc. EOE SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER ISSUE #DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS NOT F O R CON S T R U C TI O N CERTIFICATION DATE 4917 EDEN AVE. 21081.00 XX/XX/XXXX JBT MJS OWNER/DEVELOPER 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL WARNING: AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUNDGopher State One Call SITE PLAN C2-1 REQUIRED SURFACE ACCESSIBLE PARKING:xxx STALLS* *REQUIRED MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES FOR 101-150 STALLS SURFACE ACCESSIBLE PARKING:xxx STALLS ACCESSIBLE PARKING OFF-STREET PARKING CALCULATIONS PROPOSED SURFACE PARKING PROVIDED: 37 STALLS SITE NOTES 1.ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER THE DETAIL SHEET(S) AND STATE/LOCAL JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS. 2.ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL BE PROVIDED PER CURRENT ADA STANDARDS AND LOCAL/STATE REQUIREMENTS. 3.ALL CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4.ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5.TYPICAL FULL SIZED PARKING STALL IS 9' X 18' WITH A 24' WIDE TWO WAY DRIVE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6.ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 3.0' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7.BITUMINOUS IMPREGNATED FIBER BOARD TO BE PLACED AT FULL DEPTH OF CONCRETE ADJACENT TO EXISTING STRUCTURES AND BEHIND CURB ADJACENT TO DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS. 8.SEE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR SITE LIGHTING. CURRENT ZONING:xxx PROPOSED ZONING:xxx BUILDING SETBACK:xxx TOTAL PROPERTY AREA:2.08 AC. AREA OF DISTURBANCE:2.58 AC. EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA:1.82 AC PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA:1.48 AC. SITE DATA SITE PLAN LEGEND CONCRETE SIDEWALK BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT HEAVY-DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SPECIALTY LANDSCAPE PAVING N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 N N NO PARKINGEDEN AVE. BUILDING FFE=935.50 GFE=925.00 922 923 928 923 924 932 93 3 934 9 2 8 4 4 444425.00 8.0% 929 93 0 93 1 9 2 2 9 2 3 FG. 39.3 FS 4.0%FG. 29.0 FS 4.0%8 8 8 8888888 888888888888888888810:138.54± EX. 38.27± EX. 35.72 37.14 33.5233.04 33.14 33.50 33.14 32.14 32.46 32.33 32.28 32.26 31.72 32.21 32.79 32.33 32.36 33.40 33.40 33.5033.50 TW=???.??? TW=30.42 BW=25.00 BW=25.00 BW=22.75 TW=28.72 28.12 TW=28.57 TW=28.35 27.61 27.51 30.46 TW=28.20 BW=24.74 BW=23.50 BW=23.50 25.00 26.82 27.83 27.934.9%5. 9% 2.0%5.0%1. 7%5.5%1.0%4.0%4.0%1.0% 2.7%3.0%2.7%33.33 33.39 28.94 28.68 28.20 5.0%2.0%8.0% 1.0%2.0%0.5%35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.20 35.20 35.20 35.20 35.20 35.20 35.20 35.20 35.2035.2035.2035.20 31.10 31.00 31.50 31.63 31.77 31.84 31.78 32.08 34.87 35.35 34.8535.35 35.35 35.02 34.33 33.95 33.63 33.25 32.96 34.69 2.0% 6.7% 7.4%5.6%1.3%4.0%1.6% 1.6%1.6% 34.18 33.00 33.52 33.19 33.98 1.0% 3. 0 % TW=37.60 TW=37.84 TW=37.84 TW=37.10 TW=37.10 TW=37.10 TW=35.30 TW=35.30 TW=35.20 TW=35.20 TW=35.31 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=33.00 BW=32.58 BW=35.20 37.61± EX.37.50± EX.36.80± EX.36.66± EX.0.7%1.0%2.0%1.5%2.4%3.4%88888888888888888883.5%5.5%7.0%26.77 27.0027.39 27.48 25.0024.89 24.00 25.00 9279269259319339349359349339329 3 7 9 3 6 9 3 5 935 934 935 936 937 938 925932 933934 935936937938 939 34.00 36.57 8888FUTURE FRONTAGE ROAD FUTURE FRONTAGE ROAD FLUSH CURB 9' TAPER 10' TAPER 92 8 4 4 44444444444448.0% 26.82 27.83 27.93 28.94 28.68 28.20 5.0% 2.0%8.0% 33.198 826.77 27.00 27.39 27.48927926 73 Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Boarman Kroos Vogel Group Inc. EOE License Number I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional under the laws of the State of Minnesota.BKVTB-30x42Engineer Date XX/XX/XXXX24440 Michael J. St. Martin, PE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 21081.00 © 2016 BKV Group, Inc. EOE SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER ISSUE #DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS NOT F O R CON S T R U C TI O N CERTIFICATION DATE 4917 EDEN AVE. 21081.00 XX/XX/XXXX JBT MJS OWNER/DEVELOPER 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL WARNING: AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUNDGopher State One Call GRADING PLAN C3-1 N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 N N GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1.SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES, GUTTER/FLOW LINE, FACE OF BUILDING, OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.16 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 3.ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES OF TOP SOIL AND SEED/MULCH OR SOD. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED/MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. 4.FOR SITE RETAINING WALLS "TW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT TOP FACE OF WALL (NOT TOP OF WALL), "GW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT WALL GRADE TRANSITION, AND "BW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT BOTTOM FACE OF WALL (NOT BOTTOM OF BURIED WALL COURSES). 5.STREETS MUST BE CLEANED AND SWEPT WHENEVER TRACKING OF SEDIMENTS OCCURS AND BEFORE SITES ARE LEFT IDLE FOR WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS. A REGULAR SWEEPING SCHEDULE MUST BE ESTABLISHED. 6.DUST MUST BE ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED. 7.SEE SWPPP FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND REQUIREMENTS. 8.SEE UTILITY PLANS FOR WATER, STORM AND SANITARY SEWER INFORMATION. 9.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND BITUMINOUS TAPER LOCATIONS. 10.SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR FINAL SITE STABILIZATION. 11.NOTIFY CITY OF EDINA ENGINEERING DEPT. AT 952-826-0371, AT LEAST 24 HOURS PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF STORMWATER BMP'S. NO PARKINGEDEN AVE. BUILDING FFE=935.50 GFE=925.00 4 4 44448 8 8 8888888 8888888888888888888888888888888888888888888" SANITARY SEWER SERVICE INV=908.36 (VERIFY LOCATION & INV. W/ MECHANICAL) SAN SMH 100 RIM= 927.25 INV(W)= 907.39 INV(S)=907.39 48 LF 8" SANITARY @ 2.00% 270 LF 8" SANITARY @ 2.00% 5 LF - 6" FIRE PROTECTION WATER SERVICE (VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE, & INV. W/ MECHANICAL) 5 LF - 6" DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE (VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE, & INV. W/ MECHANICAL) 6" GV & HYDRANT 22.5° 6" BEND CONNECT TO EX. WATER MAIN (VERIFY LOCATION & SIZE) 30 LF 6" WM 45° 6" BEND 28LF 6" WM 6" GV 4 4 444444444444488REMOVE TOP SECTION OF MANHOLE TO ALLOW FOR DIRECTIONAL BORING, CONNECT TO MANHOLE WITH 2' INSIDE DROP AT 901.07 WITH INSIDE DROP DIRECTIONAL BORE 270 LF OF 8" PVC 8" SANITARY SEWER SERVICE INV=908.36 (VERIFY LOCATION & INV. W/ MECHANICAL) SAN SMH 100 RIM= 927.25 INV(W)= 907.39 INV(S)=907.39 48 LF 8" SANITARY @ 2.00% 270 LF 8" SANITARY @ 2.00% DRILL RIG LOCATION PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER TO BE DIRECTIONALLY BORED TO LIMIT DISTURBANCE TO STREET AND ROOTS OF MATURE TREES LAYDOWN AREA FOR PIPE FUSING AND PULLING 73 Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Boarman Kroos Vogel Group Inc. EOE License Number I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional under the laws of the State of Minnesota.BKVTB-30x42Engineer Date XX/XX/XXXX24440 Michael J. St. Martin, PE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 21081.00 © 2016 BKV Group, Inc. EOE SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER ISSUE #DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS NOT F O R CON S T R U C TI O N CERTIFICATION DATE 4917 EDEN AVE. 21081.00 XX/XX/XXXX JBT MJS OWNER/DEVELOPER 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL WARNING: AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUNDGopher State One Call SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN PLAN C4-1 N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 N N UTILITY NOTES 1. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN UTILITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS,THE MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, THE LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT , AND THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), LATEST EDITION. 2.ALL UTILITY PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE COMPACTED SAND OR FINE GRANULAR MATERIAL. ALL COMPACTION SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CEAM SPECIFICATION. 3.ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONS. THE CITY ENGINEERING INSPECTOR AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, OR WORK IMPACTING PUBLIC UTILITIES. 4.ALL STORM SEWER , SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SERVICES SHALL TERMINATE 5' FROM THE BUILDING FACE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5.A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN WATERMAIN AND ALL OTHER UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6.ALL NEW WATERMAIN AND SERVICES MUST HAVE A MINIMUM OF 8.0 FEET OF COVER. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST WATERMAIN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, AND SERVICES AS REQUIRED. INSULATION OF WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE 8.0 FEET MINIMUM DEPTH CAN NOT BE ATTAINED. 7.ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8.ALL SANITARY SEWER WYES, TEES AND SERVICES SHALL BE SCH. 40 PVC. 9.ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATCH BASINS, LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES, CHAPTER 4714. 10.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT (SEE MINNESOTA RULES, CHAPTER 4714). APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, AND OTHER STRUCTURES. 11.HIGH-DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) STORM DRAINS MUST COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA RULES, CHAPTER 4714: a.PIPES 4-INCH TO 10-INCH IN SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH AASHTO M252. b.PIPES 12-INCH TO 60-INCH IN SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM F2306. c.ALL FITTINGS MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM D3212. d.WATER-TIGHT JOINTS MUST BE USED AT ALL CONNECTIONS INCLUDING STRUCTURES. 12.HYDRANT USE: CONTRACTOR IS NOT PERMITTED TO USE HYDRANTS. ALSO APPLIES TO SUBCONTRACTORS. 13.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE CITY ENGINEERING INSPECTOR AND GIVE AT LEAST 48 HOURS NOTICE TO HAVE WATER SHUT OFF. THE CITY INSPECTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND OPERATE ALL VALVES AND FILL ALL WATER MAINS (PUBLIC AND PRIVATE). CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY IN WRITING, ALL AFFECTED CUSTOMERS AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE BEFORE SHUT OFF; ATTACH DOOR, ET., NOT IN MAILBOXES. 14.TEMPORARY SERVICE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TEMPORARY SERVICE IF SERVICE CANNOT BE RESTORED SAME DAY. IF USING HYDRANT FOR TEMPORARY SERVICE, NOTIFY PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT AND USE ONLY PRE-APPROVED HYDRANT AND SUPPLIED HYDRO METER WITH BACK FLOW. THE CONTRACTOR'S TEMPORARY MAIN SHALL BE DISINFECTED, FLUSHED AND BACTERIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS SHOWN NEGATIVE PRIOR TO PUTTING THE TEMPORARY SYSTEM IN SERVICE. THE TEMPORARY WATER SYSTEM SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT SHUTTING OFF ANY WATER MAINS. 15.SANITARY SEWER MATERIAL: PVC SDR 26 16.WATERMAIN MATERIAL: 6" PVC C900 NO PARKINGEDEN AVE. BUILDING FFE=935.50 GFE=925.00 4 4 44448 8 8 8888888 88888888888888888888888888888888888888888839 LF 12" STORM @ 2.00% CBMH 202 RIM= 926.75 INV(E)=917.22 INV(W)=917.22 CBMH 201 RIM= 924.00 INV(E)=916.70 INV(S)=916.70 CB 203 RIM= 927.55 INV(E)=925.26 CBMH 204 RIM= 927.63 INV(W)=925.06 INV(NE)=924.96 36 LF 12" STORM @ 19.08% 69 LF 12" STORM @ 8.27% BUILD CB OVER EXISTING STORM LINE 84 LF 12" STORM @ 2.27% CBMH 221 RIM= 934.00 INV(S)=919.90 AD 206 RIM=935.20 AD 214 RIM=935.20 AD 215 RIM=935.20 AD 216 RIM=935.20 AD 217 RIM=935.20 AD 213 RIM=935.20AD 2312 RIM=935.20 AD 210 RIM=935.20 AD 211 RIM=935.20 AD 207 RIM=935.20 AD 208 RIM=935.20 AD 209 RIM=935.20 CLEANOUT 231 INV= 921.38 (12") N INV= 918.68 (12") E INV=921.30 (12") W 21 LF 12" STORM @ 2.00% 109 LF 12" STORM @ 2.02% CLEANOUT 232 INV= 919.10 (12") E INV=919.10 (12") N 20 LF 12" STORM @ 2.00% CLEANOUT 233 INV= 918.70 (12") S INV=918.70 (12") W 38 LF 12" STORM @ 1.86% 26 LF 12" STORM @ 2.00% COURTYARD EOF =34.8 AREA DRAINS ALONG GRIDLINES RIM= ±935.2 STORM IN LOWER GARAGE CEILING @2.0% 20 LF 12" STORM @ 1.00% STORM TANK 96" DIA. TOP=921.00 INV=913.00 INV=18.0 INV=18.0 INV=18.0 INV=18.0 DROP STORM DOWN TO LOWER GARAGE INV= ±923.0 TRENCH DRAIN AT BASE OF WALL RIM - 35.3 0.5% PRESLOPE TRENCH DRAIN AT BASE OF WALL RIM - 35.3 0.5% PRESLOPE TRENCH DRAIN AT BASE OF WALL RIM - 35.3 TRENCH DRAIN AT BASE OF WALL RIM - 35.3 62 LF 12" STORM @ 4.32% CBMH 219 RIM= 933.00 INV(N)=928.75 CBMH 220 RIM= 931.78 INV(S)=926.09 INV(W)=925.99 INV(N)=927.39 CBMH 219 (2) RIM= 932.08 INV(S)=927.83 STORM IN GARAGE STORM OUTSIDE CBMH 240 RIM= 924.91 INV(N)=920.66 4 4 44444444444448873 Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Boarman Kroos Vogel Group Inc. EOE License Number I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional under the laws of the State of Minnesota.BKVTB-30x42Engineer Date XX/XX/XXXX24440 Michael J. St. Martin, PE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 21081.00 © 2016 BKV Group, Inc. EOE SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER ISSUE #DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS NOT F O R CON S T R U C TI O N CERTIFICATION DATE 4917 EDEN AVE. 21081.00 XX/XX/XXXX JBT MJS OWNER/DEVELOPER 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL WARNING: AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUNDGopher State One Call STORM SEWER PLAN C4-2 N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 N N UTILITY NOTES 1. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN UTILITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS,THE MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, THE LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT , AND THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), LATEST EDITION. 2.ALL UTILITY PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE COMPACTED SAND OR FINE GRANULAR MATERIAL. ALL COMPACTION SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CEAM SPECIFICATION. 3.ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONS. THE CITY ENGINEERING INSPECTOR AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, OR WORK IMPACTING PUBLIC UTILITIES. 4.ALL STORM SEWER , SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SERVICES SHALL TERMINATE 5' FROM THE BUILDING FACE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5.A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN WATERMAIN AND ALL OTHER UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6.ALL NEW WATERMAIN AND SERVICES MUST HAVE A MINIMUM OF 8.0 FEET OF COVER. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST WATERMAIN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, AND SERVICES AS REQUIRED. INSULATION OF WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE 8.0 FEET MINIMUM DEPTH CAN NOT BE ATTAINED. 7.ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8.ALL SANITARY SEWER WYES, TEES AND SERVICES SHALL BE SCH. 40 PVC. 9.ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATCH BASINS, LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES, CHAPTER 4714. 10.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT (SEE MINNESOTA RULES, CHAPTER 4714). APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, AND OTHER STRUCTURES. 11.HIGH-DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) STORM DRAINS MUST COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA RULES, CHAPTER 4714: a.PIPES 4-INCH TO 10-INCH IN SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH AASHTO M252. b.PIPES 12-INCH TO 60-INCH IN SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM F2306. c.ALL FITTINGS MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM D3212. d.WATER-TIGHT JOINTS MUST BE USED AT ALL CONNECTIONS INCLUDING STRUCTURES. 12.HYDRANT USE: CONTRACTOR IS NOT PERMITTED TO USE HYDRANTS. ALSO APPLIES TO SUBCONTRACTORS. 13.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE CITY ENGINEERING INSPECTOR AND GIVE AT LEAST 48 HOURS NOTICE TO HAVE WATER SHUT OFF. THE CITY INSPECTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND OPERATE ALL VALVES AND FILL ALL WATER MAINS (PUBLIC AND PRIVATE). CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY IN WRITING, ALL AFFECTED CUSTOMERS AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE BEFORE SHUT OFF; ATTACH DOOR, ET., NOT IN MAILBOXES. 14.TEMPORARY SERVICE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TEMPORARY SERVICE IF SERVICE CANNOT BE RESTORED SAME DAY. IF USING HYDRANT FOR TEMPORARY SERVICE, NOTIFY PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT AND USE ONLY PRE-APPROVED HYDRANT AND SUPPLIED HYDRO METER WITH BACK FLOW. THE CONTRACTOR'S TEMPORARY MAIN SHALL BE DISINFECTED, FLUSHED AND BACTERIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS SHOWN NEGATIVE PRIOR TO PUTTING THE TEMPORARY SYSTEM IN SERVICE. THE TEMPORARY WATER SYSTEM SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT SHUTTING OFF ANY WATER MAINS. 15.STORM SEWER MATERIALS: 12" OR GREATER: HDPE NO PARKINGGRAPHIC LEGEND: CIP STANDARD GRAY CONCRETE, BROOM FINISHED, TYP. TURFGRASS: SOD, IRRIGATED (SEE SPEC) PLANTING BED #1: ROCK MULCH, 4" MIN., MIXED SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS PER PLANT SCHEDULE PLANTING BED #2: HARDWOOD MULCH, 4" MIN., MIXED SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS PER PLANT SCHEDULE CIP COLORED CONCRETE, BROOM FINISHED, TYP. SHORTGRASS PRAIRIE, SEED MIX TBD TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering B K V R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_LAND_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:47:21 PMSB BH 2286-05 L100 SITE - LANDSCAPE PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN 1" = 20'-0"L100 1 SITE - LANDSCAPE PLAN FRONT PLAZA AMENITY SPACE VISITOR PARKING LOT AND TURNAROUND PARKING GARAGE RAMP ENTRANCE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT PAD DENSE TREE PLANTINGS FOR SCREENING SURFACE PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE PERENNIAL AND SHRUB PLANTINGS PER PLANT SCHEDULE SURFACE PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE PERENNIAL AND SHRUB PLANTINGS PER PLANT SCHEDULE SITE RETAINING WALL PARKING LOT CENTRAL AMENITY COURTYARD SPACE SITE RETAINING WALL UNIT WALK UPSPARKING LOT ACCESS DRIVE MAINTAINED TURF STRIP SHORT GRASS PRAIRIE SEED MIX SITE RETAINING WALL SURFACE PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE PERENNIAL AND SHRUB PLANTINGS PER PLANT SCHEDULE DENSE TREE PLANTINGS FOR SCREENING DENSE TREE PLANTINGS FOR SCREENING SURFACE PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE PERENNIAL AND SHRUB PLANTINGS PER PLANT SCHEDULE SURFACE PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE PERENNIAL AND SHRUB PLANTINGS PER PLANT SCHEDULE MOVE-IN AND TRASH ACCESS LANE RESTAURANT PATIO PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE BOUNDARY UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE BOUNDARY NO PARKINGGRAPHIC LEGEND: CIP STANDARD GRAY CONCRETE, BROOM FINISHED, TYP. TURFGRASS: SOD, IRRIGATED (SEE SPEC) PLANTING BED #1: ROCK MULCH, 4" MIN., MIXED SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS PER PLANT SCHEDULE PLANTING BED #2: HARDWOOD MULCH, 4" MIN., MIXED SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS PER PLANT SCHEDULE CIP COLORED CONCRETE, BROOM FINISHED, TYP. SHORTGRASS PRAIRIE, SEED MIX TBD PROPOSED PLANT SCHEDULE: TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering BK V R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_LAND_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:47:23 PMSB BH 2286-05 L101 SITE - PLANTING PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN 1" = 20'-0"L101 1 SITE - PLANTING PLAN QTY SYM COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME PLANTING SIZE PERENNIALS/VINES/ANNUALS 1 ac MAGGIE DALEY ASTILBE Astilbe chinensis 'Maggie Daley' #1 CONT. 1 ca FEATHER REED GRASS Calamagrostis arundinacea var. brachtytricha #1 CONT. 1 hb BLUE ANGEL HOSTA Hosta 'Blue Angel'#1 CONT. 1 hh HAPPY RETURNS DAYLILY Hemerocallis 'Happy Returns' #1 CONT. 1 pa HAMELN FOUNTAIN GRASS Pennisetum alopecuroides 'Hameln' #1 CONT. 1 pt PACHYSANDRA 'Green Carpet' Pachysandra terminalis 'Green Carpet' #1 CONT. 1 pv NORTHWIND SWITCHGRASS Panicum virgatum 'Northwind' #1 CONT. 1 rh WALKER'S LOW CATMINT Nepeta x faassenii 'Walker's Low' #1 CONT. 1 sh PRAIRIE DROPSEED Sporobolus heterolepis #1 CONT. 1 ss LITTLE BLUESTEM 'Blue Heaven' Schizachyrium scoparium 'Minnblue A' (PP17, 310) #1 CONT. ORNAMENTAL TREES 7 AG AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY Amelanchir x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance' 2" CAL. 2 BP WHITESPIRE BIRCH (CLUMP) Betula populifolia 'Whitespire' 2.5" CAL. 8 CC NORTHERN CLUMP REDBUD Cercis canadensis #20 CONT. 5 SR SUMMER STORM LILAC Syringa reticulata 'Summer Storm' (PPAF) 2" CAL. DECIDUOUS TREES 8 AS GREEN MOUNTAIN SUGAR MAPLE Acer saccharum 'Green Mountain' 2.5" CAL. 7 BN RIVER BIRCH Betula nigra 2.5" CAL. 6 BP DAKOTA PINNACLE BIRCH Betula platyphylla 'Fargo' 2.5" CAL. 3 GB AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO Ginkgo Biloba 'Autumn Gold' 2.5" CAL. 8 GT SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST Gleditsia triacanthos var. inermis 'Skycole' 2.5" CAL. 6 PT PRAIRIE GOLD ASPEN Populus tremuloides 'NEArb' 2.5" CAL. 8 QA QUAKING ASPEN Populous tremuloides #20 CONT. 7 QB SWAMP WHITE OAK Quercus bicolor 2.5" CAL. 5 QW KINDRED SPIRIT OAK Quercus x warei 'Nadler' 2.5" CAL. 5 TA AMERICAN SENTRY LINDEN Tilia americana 'MnKSentry' 2.5" CAL. DECIDUOUS SHRUBS 1 Bw NORTHERN CHARM BOXWOOD Buxus 'Wilson'#3 CONT. 1 Cc SUGARTINA CLETHRA Clethra alnifolia 'Crystalina' (PP21, 561) #2 CONT. 1 Cf ARCTIC FIRE DOGWOOD Cornus stolonifera 'Farrow' (PP18,523) #5 CONT. 1 Cs CARDINAL DOGWOOD Cornus sericea 'Cardinal' #5 CONT. 1 Ds BUTTERFLY BUSH HONEYSUCKLE Diervilla sessilifolia 'Butterfly' #5 CONT. 1 Dw DWARF WINGED EUONYMOU Euonymous alatus 'Compactus' #10 CONT. 1 Ra GRO LOW SUMAC Rhus aromatica 'Gro Low' #5 CONT. 1 Sm DWARF KOREAN LILAC Syringe meyeri 'Palibin' #5 CONT. 1 Sr RED ELDERBERRY Sambucus racemosa #5 CONT. 1 Ss SEM FALSE SPIREA Sorbaria sorbifolia 'Sem'(PP16,336) #2 CONT. CONIFEROUS TREES 1 JC SPARTAN JUNIPER Juniper chinensis 'Spartan' 6' B&B 12 PA NORWAY SPRUCE Picea abies 8' B&B 7 PS WHITE PINE Pinus Strobus 6' B&B CONIFEROUS SHRUBS 1 Cp KING'S GOLD CHAMAECYPARIS Chamaecyparis pisifera 'King's gold' #5 CONT. 1 Ct HEATHERBUN CHAMAECYPARIS Chamaecyparis thyoides 'Heather Bun' #5 CONT. 1 Jh BLUE CHIP JUNIPER Juniperus horizontalis 'Blue Chip' #5 CONT. 1 Jp SEA GREEN JUNIPER Juniperus x pfitseriana 'Sea Green' #5 CONT. 1 Js BLUE FOREST JUNIPER Juniperus sabina 'Blue Forest' #5 CONT. 1 Pb SCHOODIC PINE Pinus banksiana 'Schoodic' #3 CONT. 1 Tc TECHNITO ARBORVITAE Thuja occidentalis 'Bailjohn' (PP15, 850) 6' B&B *PLANT SCHEDULE FOR SPECIES REFERENCE ONLY, FINAL QUANTITIES TO BE DETERMINED IRRIGATION NOTE: ALL PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE DRIPLINE IRRIGATION, ALL TURF AREAS TO RECEIVE SPRAY NOZZLES PERENNIAL PLANT SPACING VARIES; (SEE PLANT MATERIALS SCHEDULE) GENERAL NOTES: • HAND LOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTANERIZED MATERIAL, TYP. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH; (SEE SPEC); 4" DEPTH, TYP. EDGE CONDITION VARIES PER PLAN PLANTING SOIL; (SEE SPEC) 18" MIN. DEPTH UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED SUBGRADE VARIES PER PLAN 1' - 6"VARIES SHRUB PLANT SPACING VARIES; (SEE PLANT MATERIALS SCHEDULE) GENERAL NOTES: • HAND LOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTANERIZED MATERIAL, TYP. • SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF PLANTING PIT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION • CENTERING OF SHRUB IN BED TO TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER DIMENSION FROM EDGE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH; (SEE SPEC); 4" DEPTH, TYP. EDGE CONDITION VARIES PER PLAN PLANTING SOIL; (SEE SPEC) 18" MIN. DEPTH UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED SUBGRADE GENERAL NOTES: • TWO ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF TREE STAKING ARE ILLUSTRATED. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION TO STAKE TREES; HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. • SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING, TYP. 8' 0" STEEL STAKE DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE; 3' @ 120 DEGREE INTERVALS, TYP. 16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE-40 MIL.; 1 1/2" WIDE STRAP, TYP. TREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH OR APPROVED EQUAL, TYP. FLAGGING; ONE PER WIRE, TYP. ORGANIC MULCH; 4" DEPTH-NO MOUNDING; 36" DIA. AROUND OUTER TRUNK, TYP. (SEE SPEC) ROOTBALL TO SIT ON MOUNDED SUBGRADE, TYP. REMOVE BURLAP AND CAGE FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOTBALL DRAIN SYSTEM AS REQUIRED; (PER SPEC) 4" DIA. PERFORATED PVC PIPE WITH SOCK-PLACED IN 42" MIN. DEPTH AUGURED HOLE; FILL WITH 3/4" DRAIN ROCK PLANTING SOIL WITH AMENDMENTS; (SEE SPEC) EDGE CONDITION VARIES; (SEE PLAN) 2" X 2" X 24" WOOD OR STEEL STAKE; SET AT ANGLE, TYP. GENERAL NOTES: • TWO ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF TREE STAKING ARE ILLUSTRATED. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION TO STAKE TREES; HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. • SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING, TYP. • CONIFERS TO HAVE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NO MULCH TO BE IN CONTACT WITH TRUNK, TYP. 8' 0" STEEL STAKE DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE; 3' @ 120 DEGREE INTERVALS, TYP. 16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE-40 MIL.; 1 1/2" WIDE STRAP, TYP. FLAGGING; ONE PER WIRE, TYP. ORGANIC MULCH; 4" DEPTH-NO MOUNDING; 36" DIA. AROUND OUTER TRUNK, TYP. (SEE SPEC) ROOTBALL TO SIT ON MOUNDED SUBGRADE, TYP. REMOVE BURLAP AND CAGE FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOTBALL DRAIN SYSTEM AS REQUIRED; (PER SPEC) 4" DIA. PERFORATED PVC PIPE WITH SOCK-PLACED IN 42" MIN. DEPTH AUGURED HOLE; FILL WITH 3/4" DRAIN ROCK PLANTING SOIL WITH AMENDMENTS; (SEE SPEC) EDGE CONDITION VARIES; (SEE PLAN) 2" X 2" X 24" WOOD OR STEEL STAKE; SET AT ANGLE, TYP.SUBGRADE SUBGRADE6' - 0"2' MIN.G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering BK V R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_LAND_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:47:23 PMSB BH 2286-05 L300 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 4917 EDEN AVE 3/4" = 1'-0"L300 1 SHRUB AND PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAILS-TYP. 1/2" = 1'-0"L300 2 TREE PLANTING DETAILS-TYP. ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN (12"RCP)NO PARKING30' - 0"5' - 6"30' - 0" STAIR A ELEV A MECH - A STAIR B ELEC/DATA ELEV C ELEV B 3337 SF RESTUARANT ENTRY VESTIBULE 1197 SF LEASING CENTER 1370 SF LOBBY 210 SF PARCEL 217 SF MAIL 1434 SF CLUBROOM 348 SF GOLF 381 SF GAME 435 SF RESTROOMS / LOCKER ROOM 1103 SF FITNESS CENTER SCULPTURE DROP OFFCOURTYARD EDEN AVE WILLSON RDBUILDING ABOVE FUTURE OUTDOOR SPACE (MN DOT LAND) ALTERNATE OUTDOOR SEATING AREA 29 SURFACE PARKING SPACES -3 PARKING PACES -FUTURE DRIVEWAY EXISTING RETAINING WALL BELOW GRADE WATER RETENTION BELOW GRADE WATER RETENTION RAMP DN 12% ALTERNATE LOADING AREA DOG RUN AREA + 934.5 6 14 15 + 930 + 935 + 935.5 + 935.5 + 924 +/-GRADE AT WALL+ 923 +/-GRADE + 930 + 925 + 927 + 937 + 935 2 TRASH CORRIDOR OPEN MN DOT LAND + 933.5 + 933.5 2 ' - 0 "SERVICE DRIVEWAY + 925 +/-GRADE + 937RAMP 15' - 0"15' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"1 0 ' - 0 " 252' - 0"212' - 0"150' - 5"1 3 7 ' - 2 "125' - 7" TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture B K V R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S TR U C TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:37:09 PMAuthor Checker 2286-05 A010 SITE PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE SITE PLAN KEYNOTES A010 1/16" = 1'-0" 1 SITE ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN 3,700 SF STAIR A ELEV A ELEV C ELEV B STAIR B18' - 0"24' - 0"21' - 2"25' - 0"8"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0" 1 8' - 0 " 2 3' - 6 "18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"2 4 ' - 0 "RAMP 12% SLOPE UP LOWER LEVEL PARKING 2 6 ' - 0 "1 A501 1 A501 2 A501 2 A501 ELECTRICAL & MECHMECH C C TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S TR U C TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:28:13 PMAuthor Checker 2286-05 A098 LEVEL OVERALL LOWER BASEMENT PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE A098 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 P2 ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTESParking Schedule Family Level Count BKV_SITE-Parking Space P2 5 ADA: 5 BKV_SITE-Parking Space P2 142 STANDARD: 142 BKV_SITE-Parking Space P1 5 ADA: 5 BKV_SITE-Parking Space P1 125 STANDARD: 125 Grand total: 277 ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN TOTAL GROSS AREA - L1 TO L7 LEVEL AREA LEVEL 1 32646 SF LEVEL 2 31793 SF LEVEL 3 33884 SF LEVEL 4 32872 SF LEVEL 5 32872 SF LEVEL 6 32872 SF LEVEL 7 31443 SF TOTAL 228382 SF TOTAL GROSS AREA - PARKING LEVELS LEVEL AREA P2 53527 SF P1 53124 SF TOTAL 106652 SF BIT. TRAILSTAIR A ELEV A RAMP 12% SLOPE ELEV C ELEV B STAIR B18' - 6"24' - 0"21' - 2"25' - 0"8"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"DN 24' - 0" 1 8' - 0 " 2 3' - 6 "18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"2 4 ' - 0 "1 8 ' - 0 "TRASH ROOM BIKE ROOM POOL ROOM LOADING / STAGGINGMECH ROOM DOG WASH UPPER LEVEL PARKING VAN VAN 24' - 5" 1 A501 1 A501 2 A501 2 A501 DOG RUN 1' - 2 1/2"RAMP 12% SLOPE DN BUILDING ABOVE WATER ROOM & FIRE PUMP SERVICE DRIVEWAY TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S TR U C TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:28:16 PMAuthor Checker 2286-05 A099 LEVEL OVERALL UPPER BASEMENT PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES A099 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 P1 Parking Schedule Family Level Count BKV_SITE-Parking Space P2 5 ADA: 5 BKV_SITE-Parking Space P2 142 STANDARD: 142 BKV_SITE-Parking Space P1 5 ADA: 5 BKV_SITE-Parking Space P1 125 STANDARD: 125 Grand total: 277 ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN TOTAL GROSS AREA - L1 TO L7 LEVEL AREA LEVEL 1 32646 SF LEVEL 2 31793 SF LEVEL 3 33884 SF LEVEL 4 32872 SF LEVEL 5 32872 SF LEVEL 6 32872 SF LEVEL 7 31443 SF TOTAL 228382 SF TOTAL GROSS AREA - PARKING LEVELS LEVEL AREA P2 53527 SF P1 53124 SF TOTAL 106652 SF 1 A401 2 A402 1 A402 2 A401 2 A403 1 A403 65' - 6"1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED STAIR A ELEV A MECH - A STAIR B ELEC/DATA ELEV C ELEV B 3337 SF RESTUARANT ENTRY VESTIBULE 1197 SF LEASING CENTER 210 SF PARCEL 217 SF MAIL 1370 SF LOBBY 1434 SF CLUBROOM 1103 SF FITNESS CENTER 435 SF RESTROOMS / LOCKER ROOM 381 SF GAME 348 SF GOLF TRASH 1 A501 1 A501 2 A501 2 A501 1036 SF UNIT B3 - 2 BED 1060 SF UNIT B2 - 2 BED 1204 SF UNIT BD1 - 2 BED DEN 1201 SF UNIT BD2 - 2 BED DEN 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 706 SF UNIT A2 - 1 BED 680 SF UNIT A2.1 - 1 BED - - - - - - 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 724 SF UNIT A3 - 1 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED CORRIDOR 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 746 SF UNIT A1.1 - 1 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 30' - 0"5' - 6"30' - 0"65' - 6"80' - 0"65' - 6"30' - 0"5' - 6"30' - 0"1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED RAMP TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S TR U C TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:28:23 PMAuthor Checker 2286-05 A101 LEVEL 1 - OVERALL FLOOR PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES A101 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 LEVEL 1 UNIT MIX - RENTABLE AREA UNIT TYPE UNIT AREA COUNT # RENTABLE / TOTAL AREA UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF 67 46918 SF UNIT A1.1 - 1 BED 746 SF 1 746 SF UNIT A2 - 1 BED 706 SF 7 4941 SF UNIT A2.1 - 1 BED 680 SF 7 4759 SF UNIT A3 - 1 BED 724 SF 11 7966 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF 52 55640 SF UNIT B2 - 2 BED 1060 SF 12 12714 SF UNIT B3 - 2 BED 1036 SF 7 7253 SF UNIT B4 - 2 BED 1161 SF 5 5807 SF UNIT BD1 - 2 BED DEN 1204 SF 6 7221 SF UNIT BD2 - 2 BED DEN 1201 SF 6 7206 SF UNIT BD3 - 2 BED DEN 1203 SF 4 4810 SF UNIT BD4 - 2 BED DEN 1247 SF 4 4990 SF UNIT PH1 - PENTHOUSE 1496 SF 2 2992 SF UNIT PH2 - PENTHOUSE 1448 SF 1 1448 SF UNIT PH3 - PENTHOUSE 1486 SF 1 1486 SF UNIT PH4 - PENTHOUSE 1750 SF 1 1737 SF UNIT PH5 - PENTHOUSE 1694 SF 1 1694 SF UNIT PH6 - PENTHOUSE 1726 SF 1 1726 SF UNIT S1 - ALCOVE 572 SF 12 6863 SF TOTAL: 208 188918 SF ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN TOTAL GROSS AREA - L1 TO L7 LEVEL AREA LEVEL 1 32646 SF LEVEL 2 31793 SF LEVEL 3 33884 SF LEVEL 4 32872 SF LEVEL 5 32872 SF LEVEL 6 32872 SF LEVEL 7 31443 SF TOTAL 228382 SF TOTAL GROSS AREA - PARKING LEVELS LEVEL AREA P2 53527 SF P1 53124 SF TOTAL 106652 SF 3,700 SF 1 A401 2 A402 1 A402 2 A401 2 A403 1 A403 STAIR A ELEV A MECH - A STAIR B MECH - B ELEV C ELEV B TRASH OPEN TO DRIVE BELOW OPEN TO LOBBY BELOW 869 SF COCKTAIL BAR / TECH LOUNGE ELEC/DATA 1 A501 1 A501 2 A501 2 A501 1036 SF UNIT B3 - 2 BED 1060 SF UNIT B2 - 2 BED 1060 SF UNIT B2 - 2 BED 1204 SF UNIT BD1 - 2 BED DEN 1201 SF UNIT BD2 - 2 BED DEN 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 706 SF UNIT A2 - 1 BED - - - - - - 680 SF UNIT A2.1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 572 SF UNIT S1 - ALCOVE 572 SF UNIT S1 - ALCOVE 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 1161 SF UNIT B4 - 2 BED 724 SF UNIT A3 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 724 SF UNIT A3 - 1 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED CORRIDOR 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 107 SF CONFERENCE 63 SF CO-WORKING OFFICE 72 SF CO-WORKING OFFICE 74 SF CO-WORKING OFFICE 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED OUTDOOR DECK TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S TR U C TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:28:31 PMAuthor Checker 2286-05 A102 LEVEL 2 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES A102 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 LEVEL 2 ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN UNIT MIX - RENTABLE AREA UNIT TYPE UNIT AREA COUNT # RENTABLE / TOTAL AREA UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF 67 46918 SF UNIT A1.1 - 1 BED 746 SF 1 746 SF UNIT A2 - 1 BED 706 SF 7 4941 SF UNIT A2.1 - 1 BED 680 SF 7 4759 SF UNIT A3 - 1 BED 724 SF 11 7966 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF 52 55640 SF UNIT B2 - 2 BED 1060 SF 12 12714 SF UNIT B3 - 2 BED 1036 SF 7 7253 SF UNIT B4 - 2 BED 1161 SF 5 5807 SF UNIT BD1 - 2 BED DEN 1204 SF 6 7221 SF UNIT BD2 - 2 BED DEN 1201 SF 6 7206 SF UNIT BD3 - 2 BED DEN 1203 SF 4 4810 SF UNIT BD4 - 2 BED DEN 1247 SF 4 4990 SF UNIT PH1 - PENTHOUSE 1496 SF 2 2992 SF UNIT PH2 - PENTHOUSE 1448 SF 1 1448 SF UNIT PH3 - PENTHOUSE 1486 SF 1 1486 SF UNIT PH4 - PENTHOUSE 1750 SF 1 1737 SF UNIT PH5 - PENTHOUSE 1694 SF 1 1694 SF UNIT PH6 - PENTHOUSE 1726 SF 1 1726 SF UNIT S1 - ALCOVE 572 SF 12 6863 SF TOTAL: 208 188918 SF TOTAL GROSS AREA - L1 TO L7 LEVEL AREA LEVEL 1 32646 SF LEVEL 2 31793 SF LEVEL 3 33884 SF LEVEL 4 32872 SF LEVEL 5 32872 SF LEVEL 6 32872 SF LEVEL 7 31443 SF TOTAL 228382 SF TOTAL GROSS AREA - PARKING LEVELS LEVEL AREA P2 53527 SF P1 53124 SF TOTAL 106652 SF 1 A401 2 A402 1 A402 2 A401 2 A403 1 A403 572 SF UNIT S1 - ALCOVE 572 SF UNIT S1 - ALCOVE STAIR A ELEV A MECH - A STAIR B ELEV C ELEV B MECH - B TRASH ELEC/DATA 1 A501 1 A501 2 A501 2 A501 1036 SF UNIT B3 - 2 BED 1060 SF UNIT B2 - 2 BED 1060 SF UNIT B2 - 2 BED 724 SF UNIT A3 - 1 BED 1247 SF UNIT BD4 - 2 BED DEN 1203 SF UNIT BD3 - 2 BED DEN 1201 SF UNIT BD2 - 2 BED DEN 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 706 SF UNIT A2 - 1 BED 680 SF UNIT A2.1 - 1 BED - - - - - - 724 SF UNIT A3 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 1161 SF UNIT B4 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED CORRIDOR 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1204 SF UNIT BD1 - 2 BED DEN 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S TR U C TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:28:40 PMAuthor Checker 2286-05 A103 LEVEL 3-6 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES A103 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 LEVEL 3 ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN UNIT MIX - RENTABLE AREA UNIT TYPE UNIT AREA COUNT # RENTABLE / TOTAL AREA UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF 67 46918 SF UNIT A1.1 - 1 BED 746 SF 1 746 SF UNIT A2 - 1 BED 706 SF 7 4941 SF UNIT A2.1 - 1 BED 680 SF 7 4759 SF UNIT A3 - 1 BED 724 SF 11 7966 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF 52 55640 SF UNIT B2 - 2 BED 1060 SF 12 12714 SF UNIT B3 - 2 BED 1036 SF 7 7253 SF UNIT B4 - 2 BED 1161 SF 5 5807 SF UNIT BD1 - 2 BED DEN 1204 SF 6 7221 SF UNIT BD2 - 2 BED DEN 1201 SF 6 7206 SF UNIT BD3 - 2 BED DEN 1203 SF 4 4810 SF UNIT BD4 - 2 BED DEN 1247 SF 4 4990 SF UNIT PH1 - PENTHOUSE 1496 SF 2 2992 SF UNIT PH2 - PENTHOUSE 1448 SF 1 1448 SF UNIT PH3 - PENTHOUSE 1486 SF 1 1486 SF UNIT PH4 - PENTHOUSE 1750 SF 1 1737 SF UNIT PH5 - PENTHOUSE 1694 SF 1 1694 SF UNIT PH6 - PENTHOUSE 1726 SF 1 1726 SF UNIT S1 - ALCOVE 572 SF 12 6863 SF TOTAL: 208 188918 SF TOTAL GROSS AREA - L1 TO L7 LEVEL AREA LEVEL 1 32646 SF LEVEL 2 31793 SF LEVEL 3 33884 SF LEVEL 4 32872 SF LEVEL 5 32872 SF LEVEL 6 32872 SF LEVEL 7 31443 SF TOTAL 228382 SF TOTAL GROSS AREA - PARKING LEVELS LEVEL AREA P2 53527 SF P1 53124 SF TOTAL 106652 SF UP 1 A401 2 A402 1 A402 2 A401 2 A403 1 A403 1496 SF UNIT PH1 - PENTHOUSE STAIR A ELEV A MECH - A STAIR B ELEV C ELEV B MECH - B 599 SF ROOFTOP AMENITY 1448 SF UNIT PH2 - PENTHOUSE 1496 SF UNIT PH1 - PENTHOUSE 1726 SF UNIT PH6 - PENTHOUSE 1737 SF UNIT PH4 - PENTHOUSE 1694 SF UNIT PH5 - PENTHOUSE 1486 SF UNIT PH3 - PENTHOUSE TRASH ELEC/DATA 1 A501 1 A501 2 A501 2 A501 1036 SF UNIT B3 - 2 BED 1060 SF UNIT B2 - 2 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 698 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 698 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1067 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 706 SF UNIT A2 - 1 BED - - - - - - 680 SF UNIT A2.1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 572 SF UNIT S1 - ALCOVE 572 SF UNIT S1 - ALCOVE 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED CORRIDOR 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1067 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED OUTDOOR DECK TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S TR U C TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:28:45 PMAuthor Checker 2286-05 A107 LEVEL 7 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES A107 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 LEVEL 7 ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN UNIT MIX - RENTABLE AREA UNIT TYPE UNIT AREA COUNT # RENTABLE / TOTAL AREA UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF 67 46918 SF UNIT A1.1 - 1 BED 746 SF 1 746 SF UNIT A2 - 1 BED 706 SF 7 4941 SF UNIT A2.1 - 1 BED 680 SF 7 4759 SF UNIT A3 - 1 BED 724 SF 11 7966 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF 52 55640 SF UNIT B2 - 2 BED 1060 SF 12 12714 SF UNIT B3 - 2 BED 1036 SF 7 7253 SF UNIT B4 - 2 BED 1161 SF 5 5807 SF UNIT BD1 - 2 BED DEN 1204 SF 6 7221 SF UNIT BD2 - 2 BED DEN 1201 SF 6 7206 SF UNIT BD3 - 2 BED DEN 1203 SF 4 4810 SF UNIT BD4 - 2 BED DEN 1247 SF 4 4990 SF UNIT PH1 - PENTHOUSE 1496 SF 2 2992 SF UNIT PH2 - PENTHOUSE 1448 SF 1 1448 SF UNIT PH3 - PENTHOUSE 1486 SF 1 1486 SF UNIT PH4 - PENTHOUSE 1750 SF 1 1737 SF UNIT PH5 - PENTHOUSE 1694 SF 1 1694 SF UNIT PH6 - PENTHOUSE 1726 SF 1 1726 SF UNIT S1 - ALCOVE 572 SF 12 6863 SF TOTAL: 208 188918 SF TOTAL GROSS AREA - L1 TO L7 LEVEL AREA LEVEL 1 32646 SF LEVEL 2 31793 SF LEVEL 3 33884 SF LEVEL 4 32872 SF LEVEL 5 32872 SF LEVEL 6 32872 SF LEVEL 7 31443 SF TOTAL 228382 SF TOTAL GROSS AREA - PARKING LEVELS LEVEL AREA P2 53527 SF P1 53124 SF TOTAL 106652 SF DN 1 A401 2 A402 1 A402 2 A401 2 A403 1 A403 STAIR B PHOTOVOLTAIC ZONE STAIR ROOF 1 A501 1 A501 2 A501 2 A501 ELEV OVERRUN GARDEN PLOTS MECH UNIT RESTAURANT VENTING MECH UNIT ROOF HATCH - - - - - - ROOF ANCHOR LOCATIONS ROOF ANCHOR LOCATIONS ROOF ANCHOR LOCATIONS ROOF ANCHOR LOCATIONS ROOF ANCHOR LOCATIONS ROOF ANCHOR LOCATIONSSLOPESLOPESLOPESLOPE TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S TR U C TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:28:50 PMAuthor Checker 2286-05 A140 ROOF PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE A140 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 ROOF ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND FBR-1 WHITE BRICK STN-1 KASOTA STONE OR MANUFACTURED STONE FSDG-1 CEMENT BOARD SIDING AND TRIM DARK GREY DCMU-1 SPLIT FACE BLOCK - BUFF COLOR MP-1 METAL PANEL - COPPER FINISH UNACLAD FIRESTONE - CLASSIC COPPER MP-2 DECORATIVE METAL CEILING PANELS COPPER FINISH FSDG-2 CEMENT BOARD SIDING AND TRIM BUFF COLOR LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" P1 90' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 175' - 10" P2 80' - 0" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4"10' - 6"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"12' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"75' - 10"METAL RAILING -BLACKMETAL FRAME CANOPIES -DARK GREY FBR-1 FSDG-1FSDG-1 STN-1 MP-1 STN-1 DCMU-1 METAL CANOPY -COPPER METAL CANOPY -COPPER BLACK WINDOW FRAMES DECORATIVE EXTRUDED BRICK DECORATIVE CEMENT BOARD TRIM LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" P1 90' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 175' - 10" P2 80' - 0" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4"10' - 0"10' - 0"12' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 6"FBR-1 FSDG-1 FSDG-1 STN-1 MP-1 FSDG-1METAL FRAMED CANOPY -COPPER METAL CANOPIES -COPPER BLACK WINDOW FRAMESDECORATIVE EXTRUDED BRICKDECORATIVE CEMENT BOARD TRIM UNIT MECH. UNITS - MATCH ADJACENT COLOR FBR-1 G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S TR U C TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:29:06 PMAuthor Checker 2286-05 A401 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 4917 EDEN AVE EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES A401 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 EAST ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN A401 3/32" = 1'-0" 2 NORTH LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" P1 90' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 175' - 10" P2 80' - 0" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4"10' - 6"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"12' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"75' - 10"FBR-1 FSDG-1 MP-1 FSDG-1 STN-1FSDG-1 METAL CANOPY FRAMES -COPPER METAL CANOPIES -COPPER BLACK WINDOW FRAMES BLACK METAL RAILINGS EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND FBR-1 WHITE BRICK STN-1 KASOTA STONE OR MANUFACTURED STONE FSDG-1 CEMENT BOARD SIDING AND TRIM DARK GREY DCMU-1 SPLIT FACE BLOCK - BUFF COLOR MP-1 METAL PANEL - COPPER FINISH UNACLAD FIRESTONE - CLASSIC COPPER MP-2 DECORATIVE METAL CEILING PANELS COPPER FINISH FSDG-2 CEMENT BOARD SIDING AND TRIM BUFF COLOR LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" P1 90' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 175' - 10" P2 80' - 0"10' - 6"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"12' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4"75' - 10"DOG RUN AREA FSDG-1 FBR-1 FSDG-1 STN-1 DCMU-1FSDG-1DCMU-1 BLACK METAL RAILING DECORATIVE EXTRUDED BRICK DECORATIVE CEMENT BOARD TRIM MECH LOUVER -BUFFMECH. LOUVER -BUFF BLACK WINDOW FRAMES OVERHEAD LOADING DOOR G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S TR U C TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:29:22 PMAuthor Checker 2286-05 A402 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 4917 EDEN AVE EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES A402 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 WEST ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN A402 3/32" = 1'-0" 2 SOUTH LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" P1 90' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 175' - 10" P2 80' - 0" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4"10' - 6"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"12' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"75' - 10"FSDG-1 FBR-1 STN-1 FSDG-1UNIT MECH. LOUVERS - MATCH ADJACENT COLOR DECORATIVE EXTRUDED BRICK DECORATIVE CEMENT BOARD TRIM BLACK METAL RAILING BLACK WINDOW FRAMES FSDG-2 LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" P1 90' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 175' - 10" P2 80' - 0" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4"10' - 0"10' - 0"12' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 6"75' - 10"MP-1 FBR-1 FSDG-1FSDG-1 STN-1 METAL FRAMED CANOPY -COPPER DECORATIVE EXTRUDED BRICK DECORATIVE CEMENT BOARD TRIMBLACK WINDOW FRAMESUNIT MECH. LOUVERS -MATCH ADJACENT COLORBLACK METAL RAILINGSMETAL FRAMED CANOPY -COPPER FSDG-2 EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND FBR-1 WHITE BRICK STN-1 KASOTA STONE OR MANUFACTURED STONE FSDG-1 CEMENT BOARD SIDING AND TRIM DARK GREY DCMU-1 SPLIT FACE BLOCK - BUFF COLOR MP-1 METAL PANEL - COPPER FINISH UNACLAD FIRESTONE - CLASSIC COPPER MP-2 DECORATIVE METAL CEILING PANELS COPPER FINISH FSDG-2 CEMENT BOARD SIDING AND TRIM BUFF COLOR G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S TR U C TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:29:36 PMAuthor Checker 2286-05 A403 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 4917 EDEN AVE A403 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 COURTYARD -NORTH A403 3/32" = 1'-0" 2 COURTYARD -SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" P1 90' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 175' - 10" P2 80' - 0" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4"10' - 6"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"12' - 0"10' - 0"(+735'-00" CIVIL)75' - 10"RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL AMENITYCOURTYARD PARKING GARAGE LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" P1 90' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 175' - 10" P2 80' - 0" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4" (+735'-00" CIVIL)10' - 6"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"12' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"75' - 10"PARKING GARAGE RESIDENTAIL G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture B K V R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S TR U C TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:35:50 PMAuthor Checker 2286-05 A501 BUILDING SECTIONS 4917 EDEN AVE A501 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 Section 1 ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN A501 3/32" = 1'-0" 2 Section 2 2 2 1 1 March 12th, 2021 4917 EDEN AVE. EDINA, MINNESOTA RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN SITE - Vicinity Map LEGEND Project Site Parks / Recreation Area 1. Edina Parks Recreation 2. Edina Country Club 3. Utley Park 4. Wooddale Park 5. Arden Park 6. Arden Park Rink 7. Todd Park 8. Highlands Park 9. Garden Park Education 1. Edina Cahill Historical School 2. Our Lady of Grace Catholic School 3. Highlands Elementary School Civic Facilities 1. Edina Police Department 2. Edina City Hall 3. Church 4. Edina Hennepin County Library 5. Minnepolis Heart Institute - Edina 6. Funeral Home Neighborhood Amenities 1. Bloomington Lake Clinic - Edina 2. Grocery / Convenience Stores 3. UPS/Postal Service 4. CenturyLin - Telecom Provider Transportation Bus L1 = 46,146, 568 L2 = 46,146, 568, 587 Train 1/2 MILE 1/4 MILE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 1 3 3 3 3 4 4 2 45 1 2 2 6 2 3 # L1 L1 587 L2 RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN SITE - Photographs SOUTHWEST VIEW SITE ENTRY - VIEW FROM EAST ACROSS HIGHWAY 100 - VIEW FROM WESTSITE ENTRY - VIEW FROM SOUTHEASTVIEW FROM NORTHSITE ENTRY - VIEW FROM NORTH RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN CONTEXT - Connectivity 2. EDEN AVE ABOVE HIGHWAY100 1. EDEN AVE + WILSON RD INTERSECTION 3. WILSON RD 5. HIGHWAY 1004. EDEN AVE SITE 14 2 5 3 RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN SITE - Current Aerial Map True North 0 25 50 100 200 RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN SITE - City Roadway Diagram - Option B True North NEW OFF RAMP/ ROADWAY SPLITS THE SITE NEW N-S CONNECTION ON EAST SIDE OF HIGHWAY 100 NEW N-S CONNECTION ON WEST SIDE OF HIGHWAY 100 NEW CONNECTION OVER THE HIGHWAY True North62' - 6"6' - 6"28' - 0"28' - 0"15' - 0"15' - 0" 230' - 0"307' - 8"249' - 4"156' - 11"SITE C65,384 ft2 SITE B40,512 ft2 EDEN AVEHIGHWAY 10050th & VERNON258' - 0" 228' - 11" 10'15'1 5'10' E D E N A V E +8,502 SF SITE A80,086 GSF1.84 Acres 88,588 GSF2.03 Acres170' - 6"GRANGE ROADWILLSON RDOFF RAMP/ NEW ROADGOLF COURSE EDINA CITY HALL RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN Site Plans (12"R C P)NO PARKI NG30' - 0" 5' - 6" 3 0' - 0" STAIR A ELEV A MECH - A STAIR B ELEC/DATA ELEV C ELEV B 3337 SF RESTUARANT ENTRY VESTIBULE 1197 SF LEASING CENTER 1370 SF LOBBY 210 SF PARCEL 217 SF MAIL 1434 SF CLUBROOM 348 SF GOLF 381 SF GAME 435 SF RESTROOMS / LOCKERROOM 1103 SF FITNESS CENTER SCULPTURE DROP OFFCOURTYARD EDEN AVE WILLSON RDBUILDING ABOVE FUTURE OUTDOOR SPACE(MN DOT LAND) ALTERNATE OUTDOORSEATING AREA 29 SURFACE PARKING SPACES -3 PARKING PACES -FUTURE DRIVEWAY EXISTINGRETAINING WALL BELOW GRADEWATER RETENTION BELOW GRADEWATER RETENTION RAMP DN12% ALTERNATELOADING AREA DOG RUNAREA + 934.5 6 14 15 + 930 + 935 + 935.5 + 935.5 + 924+/-GRADE ATWALL+ 923+/-GRADE + 930 + 925 + 927 + 937 + 935 2 TRASH CORRIDOR OPEN MN DOT LAND + 933.5 + 933.5 2 ' - 0 "SERVICE DRIVEWAY + 925+/-GRADE + 937RAMP 15' - 0"15' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0" 252' - 0"212' - 0"150' - 5"13 7' - 2 "125' - 7" TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH GArchitectureInterior DesignLandscape ArchitectureBK VROUP222 North Second StreetLong & Kees Bldg Suite 101Minneapolis, MN 55401612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BYCHECKED BYCOMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS NOT FOR CO NSTRUCTIO NCERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:37:09 PMAuthorChecker2286-05 A010 SITE PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE SITE PLAN KEYNOTES A010 1/16" = 1'-0" 1 SITE ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN Floor Plans Lower Basement Upper Basement Ground Level Level 2-6 Level 7 STAIR A ELEV A ELEV C ELEV B STAIR B18' - 0"24' - 0"21' - 2"25' - 0"8"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0" 18' - 0" 23' - 6" 18' - 0" 24' - 0" 18' - 0" 24' - 0"RAMP 12% SLOPEUP LOWER LEVEL PARKING 26' - 0"1A501 1A501 2A501 2A501 ELECTRICAL & MECHMECH C C TRUE NORTHPLAN NORTH G ArchitectureInterior DesignLandscape Architecture BKVROUP 222 North Second StreetLong & Kees Bldg Suite 101Minneapolis, MN 55401612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BYCHECKED BYCOMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS NO T FO R C ON STR UC TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:28:13 PMAuthorChecker2286-05 A098 LEVEL OVERALLLOWERBASEMENT PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE A098 3/32" = 1'-0"1 P2 ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTESParking Schedule Family Level Count BKV_SITE-Parking Space P2 5ADA: 5BKV_SITE-Parking Space P2 142STANDARD: 142BKV_SITE-Parking Space P1 5ADA: 5BKV_SITE-Parking Space P1 125STANDARD: 125Grand total: 277 ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN TOTAL GROSS AREA - L1 TO L7 LEVEL AREA LEVEL 1 32646 SFLEVEL 2 31793 SFLEVEL 3 33884 SFLEVEL 4 32872 SFLEVEL 5 32872 SFLEVEL 6 32872 SFLEVEL 7 31443 SFTOTAL228382 SF TOTAL GROSS AREA - PARKING LEVELS LEVEL AREA P2 53527 SFP153124 SFTOTAL106652 SF BIT. TRAILSTAIR A ELEV A RAMP 12% SLOPE ELEV C ELEV B STAIR B18' - 6"24' - 0"21' - 2"25' - 0"8"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"DN 24' - 0" 18' - 0" 23' - 6"18' - 0" 24' - 0" 18' - 0" 24' - 0" 18' - 0" TRASH ROOM BIKE ROOM POOL ROOM LOADING / STAGGINGMECH ROOM DOG WASH UPPER LEVEL PARKING VAN VAN 24' - 5" 1A501 1A501 2A501 2A501 DOG RUN 1' - 2 1/2"RAMP 12% SLOPEDN BUILDING ABOVE WATER ROOM & FIREPUMP SERVICE DRIVEWAY TRUE NORTHPLAN NORTH G ArchitectureInterior DesignLandscape Architecture BKVROUP 222 North Second StreetLong & Kees Bldg Suite 101Minneapolis, MN 55401612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BYCHECKED BYCOMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T FOR CO N STR U CT ION CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:28:16 PMAuthorChecker2286-05 A099 LEVEL OVERALLUPPERBASEMENT PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES A099 3/32" = 1'-0"1 P1 Parking Schedule Family Level Count BKV_SITE-Parking Space P2 5ADA: 5BKV_SITE-Parking Space P2 142STANDARD: 142BKV_SITE-Parking Space P1 5ADA: 5BKV_SITE-Parking Space P1 125STANDARD: 125Grand total: 277 ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN TOTAL GROSS AREA - L1 TO L7 LEVEL AREA LEVEL 1 32646 SFLEVEL 2 31793 SFLEVEL 3 33884 SFLEVEL 4 32872 SFLEVEL 5 32872 SFLEVEL 6 32872 SFLEVEL 7 31443 SFTOTAL228382 SF TOTAL GROSS AREA - PARKING LEVELS LEVEL AREA P2 53527 SFP153124 SFTOTAL106652 SF 1A401 2A402 1A402 2A401 2A403 1A40365' - 6" 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED STAIR A ELEV A MECH - A STAIR B ELEC/DATA ELEV C ELEV B3337 SF RESTUARANT ENTRY VESTIBULE 1197 SF LEASING CENTER 210 SF PARCEL 217 SF MAIL 1370 SF LOBBY 1434 SF CLUBROOM 1103 SF FITNESS CENTER 435 SF RESTROOMS / LOCKERROOM 381 SF GAME 348 SF GOLF TRASH 1A501 1A501 2A501 2A501 1036 SF UNIT B3 - 2 BED 1060 SF UNIT B2 - 2 BED 1204 SF UNIT BD1 - 2 BED DEN 1201 SF UNIT BD2 - 2 BED DEN700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 706 SF UNIT A2 - 1 BED 680 SF UNIT A2.1 - 1 BED -- -- -- 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 724 SF UNIT A3 - 1 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED CORRIDOR 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 746 SF UNIT A1.1 - 1 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 30' - 0" 5' - 6" 30' - 0"65' - 6"80' - 0"65' - 6"30' - 0"5' - 6"30' - 0"1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED RAMP TRUE NORTHPLAN NORTH G ArchitectureInterior DesignLandscape Architecture BKVROUP 222 North Second StreetLong & Kees Bldg Suite 101Minneapolis, MN 55401612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BYCHECKED BYCOMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS NO T FO R C O NST R U C TIO NCERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:28:23 PMAuthorChecker2286-05 A101 LEVEL 1 -OVERALL FLOORPLAN 4917 EDEN AVE ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES A101 3/32" = 1'-0"1 LEVEL 1 UNIT MIX - RENTABLE AREA UNIT TYPE UNIT AREA COUNT #RENTABLE /TOTAL AREA UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF 67 46918 SFUNIT A1.1 - 1 BED 746 SF 1 746 SFUNIT A2 - 1 BED 706 SF 7 4941 SFUNIT A2.1 - 1 BED 680 SF 7 4759 SFUNIT A3 - 1 BED 724 SF 11 7966 SFUNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF 52 55640 SFUNIT B2 - 2 BED 1060 SF 12 12714 SFUNIT B3 - 2 BED 1036 SF 7 7253 SFUNIT B4 - 2 BED 1161 SF 5 5807 SFUNIT BD1 - 2 BED DEN 1204 SF 6 7221 SFUNIT BD2 - 2 BED DEN 1201 SF 6 7206 SFUNIT BD3 - 2 BED DEN 1203 SF 4 4810 SFUNIT BD4 - 2 BED DEN 1247 SF 4 4990 SFUNIT PH1 - PENTHOUSE 1496 SF 2 2992 SFUNIT PH2 - PENTHOUSE 1448 SF 1 1448 SFUNIT PH3 - PENTHOUSE 1486 SF 1 1486 SFUNIT PH4 - PENTHOUSE 1750 SF 1 1737 SFUNIT PH5 - PENTHOUSE 1694 SF 1 1694 SFUNIT PH6 - PENTHOUSE 1726 SF 1 1726 SFUNIT S1 - ALCOVE 572 SF 12 6863 SFTOTAL: 208 188918 SF ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN TOTAL GROSS AREA - L1 TO L7 LEVEL AREA LEVEL 1 32646 SFLEVEL 2 31793 SFLEVEL 3 33884 SFLEVEL 4 32872 SFLEVEL 5 32872 SFLEVEL 6 32872 SFLEVEL 7 31443 SFTOTAL228382 SF TOTAL GROSS AREA - PARKING LEVELS LEVEL AREA P2 53527 SFP153124 SFTOTAL106652 SF 1A401 2A402 1A402 2A401 2A403 1A403 572 SF UNIT S1 - ALCOVE 572 SF UNIT S1 - ALCOVE STAIR A ELEV A MECH - A STAIR B ELEV C ELEV B MECH - B TRASH ELEC/DATA 1A501 1A501 2A501 2A501 1036 SF UNIT B3 - 2 BED 1060 SF UNIT B2 - 2 BED 1060 SF UNIT B2 - 2 BED 724 SF UNIT A3 - 1 BED 1247 SF UNIT BD4 - 2 BED DEN 1203 SF UNIT BD3 - 2 BED DEN 1201 SF UNIT BD2 - 2 BED DEN 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 706 SF UNIT A2 - 1 BED 680 SF UNIT A2.1 - 1 BED -- -- -- 724 SF UNIT A3 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 1161 SF UNIT B4 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED CORRIDOR 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1204 SF UNIT BD1 - 2 BED DEN 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED TRUE NORTHPLAN NORTH G ArchitectureInterior DesignLandscape Architecture BKVROUP 222 North Second StreetLong & Kees Bldg Suite 101Minneapolis, MN 55401612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BYCHECKED BYCOMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T FO R C O N STR UC TION CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:28:40 PMAuthorChecker2286-05 A103 LEVEL 3-6OVERALL FLOORPLAN 4917 EDEN AVE ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES A103 3/32" = 1'-0"1 LEVEL 3 ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGNUNIT MIX - RENTABLE AREA UNIT TYPE UNIT AREA COUNT # RENTABLE /TOTAL AREA UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF 67 46918 SFUNIT A1.1 - 1 BED 746 SF 1 746 SFUNIT A2 - 1 BED 706 SF 7 4941 SFUNIT A2.1 - 1 BED 680 SF 7 4759 SFUNIT A3 - 1 BED 724 SF 11 7966 SFUNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF 52 55640 SFUNIT B2 - 2 BED 1060 SF 12 12714 SFUNIT B3 - 2 BED 1036 SF 7 7253 SFUNIT B4 - 2 BED 1161 SF 5 5807 SFUNIT BD1 - 2 BED DEN 1204 SF 6 7221 SFUNIT BD2 - 2 BED DEN 1201 SF 6 7206 SFUNIT BD3 - 2 BED DEN 1203 SF 4 4810 SFUNIT BD4 - 2 BED DEN 1247 SF 4 4990 SFUNIT PH1 - PENTHOUSE 1496 SF 2 2992 SFUNIT PH2 - PENTHOUSE 1448 SF 1 1448 SFUNIT PH3 - PENTHOUSE 1486 SF 1 1486 SFUNIT PH4 - PENTHOUSE 1750 SF 1 1737 SFUNIT PH5 - PENTHOUSE 1694 SF 1 1694 SFUNIT PH6 - PENTHOUSE 1726 SF 1 1726 SFUNIT S1 - ALCOVE 572 SF 12 6863 SFTOTAL: 208 188918 SF TOTAL GROSS AREA - L1 TO L7LEVELAREA LEVEL 1 32646 SFLEVEL 2 31793 SFLEVEL 3 33884 SFLEVEL 4 32872 SFLEVEL 5 32872 SFLEVEL 6 32872 SFLEVEL 7 31443 SFTOTAL228382 SF TOTAL GROSS AREA - PARKING LEVELSLEVELAREA P2 53527 SFP153124 SFTOTAL106652 SF Roof Plan UP 1A401 2A402 1A402 2A401 2A403 1A403 1496 SF UNIT PH1 - PENTHOUSE STAIR A ELEV A MECH - A STAIR B ELEV C ELEV B MECH - B 599 SF ROOFTOP AMENITY 1448 SF UNIT PH2 - PENTHOUSE 1496 SF UNIT PH1 - PENTHOUSE 1726 SF UNIT PH6 - PENTHOUSE 1737 SF UNIT PH4 - PENTHOUSE 1694 SF UNIT PH5 - PENTHOUSE 1486 SF UNIT PH3 - PENTHOUSE TRASH ELEC/DATA 1A501 1A501 2A501 2A501 1036 SF UNIT B3 - 2 BED 1060 SF UNIT B2 - 2 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 698 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED698 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1067 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED706 SF UNIT A2 - 1 BED -- -- -- 680 SF UNIT A2.1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 572 SF UNIT S1 - ALCOVE 572 SF UNIT S1 - ALCOVE 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED CORRIDOR 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1067 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED OUTDOOR DECK TRUE NORTHPLAN NORTH G ArchitectureInterior DesignLandscape Architecture BKVROUP 222 North Second StreetLong & Kees Bldg Suite 101Minneapolis, MN 55401612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BYCHECKED BYCOMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS NO T FO R C O NST RU C TIO NCERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:28:45 PMAuthorChecker2286-05 A107 LEVEL 7OVERALL FLOORPLAN 4917 EDEN AVE ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES A107 3/32" = 1'-0"1 LEVEL 7 ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGNUNIT MIX - RENTABLE AREA UNIT TYPE UNIT AREA COUNT # RENTABLE /TOTAL AREA UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF 67 46918 SFUNIT A1.1 - 1 BED 746 SF 1 746 SFUNIT A2 - 1 BED 706 SF 7 4941 SFUNIT A2.1 - 1 BED 680 SF 7 4759 SFUNIT A3 - 1 BED 724 SF 11 7966 SFUNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF 52 55640 SFUNIT B2 - 2 BED 1060 SF 12 12714 SFUNIT B3 - 2 BED 1036 SF 7 7253 SFUNIT B4 - 2 BED 1161 SF 5 5807 SFUNIT BD1 - 2 BED DEN 1204 SF 6 7221 SFUNIT BD2 - 2 BED DEN 1201 SF 6 7206 SFUNIT BD3 - 2 BED DEN 1203 SF 4 4810 SFUNIT BD4 - 2 BED DEN 1247 SF 4 4990 SFUNIT PH1 - PENTHOUSE 1496 SF 2 2992 SFUNIT PH2 - PENTHOUSE 1448 SF 1 1448 SFUNIT PH3 - PENTHOUSE 1486 SF 1 1486 SFUNIT PH4 - PENTHOUSE 1750 SF 1 1737 SFUNIT PH5 - PENTHOUSE 1694 SF 1 1694 SFUNIT PH6 - PENTHOUSE 1726 SF 1 1726 SFUNIT S1 - ALCOVE 572 SF 12 6863 SFTOTAL: 208 188918 SF TOTAL GROSS AREA - L1 TO L7LEVELAREA LEVEL 1 32646 SFLEVEL 2 31793 SFLEVEL 3 33884 SFLEVEL 4 32872 SFLEVEL 5 32872 SFLEVEL 6 32872 SFLEVEL 7 31443 SFTOTAL228382 SF TOTAL GROSS AREA - PARKING LEVELSLEVELAREA P2 53527 SFP153124 SFTOTAL106652 SF DN 1A401 2A402 1A402 2A401 2A403 1A403 STAIR B PHOTOVOLTAIC ZONE STAIR ROOF 1A501 1A501 2A501 2A501 ELEVOVERRUN GARDEN PLOTS MECH UNIT RESTAURANT VENTING MECH UNIT ROOF HATCH -- -- -- ROOF ANCHOR LOCATIONS ROOF ANCHOR LOCATIONS ROOF ANCHOR LOCATIONS ROOF ANCHOR LOCATIONS ROOF ANCHOR LOCATIONS ROOF ANCHOR LOCATIONSSLOPESLOPESLOPESLOPE TRUE NORTHPLAN NORTH G ArchitectureInterior DesignLandscape Architecture BKVROUP 222 North Second StreetLong & Kees Bldg Suite 101Minneapolis, MN 55401612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BYCHECKED BYCOMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T FOR CO N STR UC T ION CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:28:50 PMAuthorChecker2286-05 A140 ROOF PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE A140 3/32" = 1'-0"1 ROOF ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN CONTEXT + DESIGN CONCEPTS EXTERIOR DESIGN: RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN Immediate Site Context GRANGE HALL EDINA CITY HALL EDINA EXECUTIVE PLAZA OUR LADY OF GRACEEDINA COUNTRY CLUB RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN Architectural Context 5000 FRANCE AVENUE AVIDOR NOLAN MAINS, MARKET STREET RESTORATION HARDWARE5200 FRANCE AVENUE RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN CHARACTER IMAGES HOMES DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE GOLF COURSE RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN New Concept - Rendering RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN New Concept - Rendering RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN New Concept - Rendering RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN New Concept - Rendering RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN New Concept - Rendering RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN New Concept - Rendering RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN New Concept - Material RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN FBR-1 white brick STN-1 kasota stone or manufactured stone FSDG-1 cement board siding and trim dark grey MP-1 & 2 metal panel copper finish DCMU-1 split face block buff color FSDG-2 cement board siding and trim buff NEW CONCEPT - Materialss STAIR B PHOTOVOLTAIC ZONE (SOLAR READY) STAIR ROOF 1 A501 1 A501 2 A501 2 A501 ELEV OVERRUN GARDEN PLOTS MECH UNIT RESTAURANT VENTING MECH UNIT ROOF HATCH ROOF ANCHOR LOCATIONS ROOF ANCHOR LOCATIONS ROOF ANCHOR LOCATIONS ROOF ANCHOR LOCATIONS ROOF ANCHOR LOCATIONS ROOF ANCHOR LOCATIONSSLOPESLOPESLOPESLOPEROOF TOP PATIO STRING LIGHTS ABOVE FIRE FEATURE TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering B K V R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S TR U C TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt4/7/2021 9:23:28 PMAuthor Checker 2286-05 A140 ROOF PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE A140 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 ROOF ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN 4917 Eden Avenue – Grandview Guiding Principles 4/7/21 Seven Guiding Principles of Grandview Area 1. Leverage publicly owned parcels and civic presence to create a vibrant and connected District that serves as a catalyst for high quality, integrated public and private development. The 4917 Eden Ave development is a private high-quality development adjacent to public space and public buildings. This steppingstone project is on the east side of Highway 100 and will encourage high quality development nearby. 2. Enhance the District’s economic viability as a neighborhood center with regional connections, recognizing that meeting the needs of both businesses and residents will make the District a good place to do business. The Eden Avenue project is a mixed-use project that features 208 residence and a restaurant. The addition of residential units to the site will place more residents closer to the existing and future Grandview businesses. 3. Turn perceived barriers into opportunities. Consider layering development over supporting infrastructure and taking advantage of the natural topography of the area. The current site is primarily a stepped parking lot with aged sidewalks wrapping the site. Further its open nature increases Highway 100 noise into the area. The new project will create a visually rich and interesting experience with new sidewalks, robust landscaping, a corner sculpture plaza, the building veranda, and active uses on the first level along Eden Avenue. Most of the project parking is located below grade. Additionally, the building will reduce the noise impacts of Highway 100 to the direct neighbors. 4. Design for the present and the future by pursuing logical increments of change using key parcels as stepping stones to a more vibrant, walkable, functional, attractive, and life-filled place. The Eden Ave project transformers a two-story restaurant and surface parking lot into a 7-story mixed- use project. The new project brings a walkable, vibrant, and attractive building to the east side of Highway 100. It also preserves space on the east side of the site for the potential future off ramp configuration. This reconfiguration of the off ramps could lead to creation of 2 developable sites to the north. 5. Organize parking as an effective resource for the District by linking community parking to public and private destinations while also providing parking that is convenient for businesses and customers. The Eden Ave project is acting as a steppingstone to bringing new development to the east side of Highway 100. The building provides a convenient surface parking lot for the restaurant. It also provides a small amount of surface convenience stalls and circular off street drop off for ride sharing vehicles, food delivery vehicles, guests, and future residents. A majority of the resident parking is located below grade to minimize its impact on site. 6. Improve movement within and access to the District for people of all ages by facilitating multiple modes of transportation, and preserve future transit opportunities provided by the rail corridor. The Eden Avenue project is designed to encourage multiple modes of transportation including walking, bicycling, and automobile use. Walkability of the site is increased by the creation of new sidewalks, robust landscaping, and an active and interesting building design. Bicycling is encouraged on the project with bike racks near the entries to the restaurant and the residential lobby. The building also includes a secure bicycle storage room with a repair station. For automobiles the site locates majority of the resident parking below grade. The project will include 2 EV charging stations and will be designed to accommodate additional future charging stations. 7. Create an identity and unique sense of place that incorporates natural spaces into a high quality and sustainable development reflecting Edina’s innovative development heritage The existing site is a vast stepped parking lot with no current control on rainwater. The new building and site are designed to reflect the context of the area. The design is centered around a large open courtyard that faces toward the Edina Country Club golf course, visually connecting the two spaces. New robust landscaping will be provided throughout the new project. The new project also includes numerous sustainable features. The project incorporates a storm water treatment system that includes a pretreatment chamber and perforated CMP pipe gallery in a crushed rock bed, with a controlled outlet to the MnDOT storm sewer system. The system will provide rate control, treatment and volume control to meet the requirements of the City of Edina, MnDOT and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Additionally, the project will be solar ready on the roof, provide garden bed for residents, native plantings, LED light fixtures, energy star appliances, a recycling chute, and construction waste recycling. A more robust list is provided in the Edina sustainability questionnaire. File #227702673 April 19, 2021 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Maple Plain, MN 55359 Phone: 7963-479-4200 Fax: 763-479-4242 Prepared for: City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Traffic and Parking Study for 4917 Eden Avenue in Edina, MN April 2021 i Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................... I 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................... 1-1 2.0 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND ........................................................... 2-1 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................... 3-1 4.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTS ........................................................................ 4-1 5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................... 5-1 6.0 PARKING ANALYSIS ......................................................................... 6-1 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................... 7-1 8.0 APPENDIX ........................................................................................ 8-1 FIGURES FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................. 2-2 FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN ................................................................................ 2-3 FIGURE 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................. 3-4 FIGURE 4 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES .......................................... 4-3 FIGURE 5 WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES ........................................... 4-4 FIGURE 6 WEEKDAY AM LOS RESULTS ...................................................... 5-7 FIGURE 7 WEEKDAY PM LOS RESULTS ...................................................... 5-8 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. __________________________________ DATE: April 19, 2021 Edward F. Terhaar License No. 24441 April 2021 1-1 1.0 Executive Summary The purpose of this Traffic and Parking Study is to evaluate the impacts of the proposed new residential building located at 4917 Eden Avenue Edina, MN. The project site is located on the south side of Eden Avenue west of Willson Road. The proposed project location is currently occupied by a Perkins restaurant, office space, and a parking lot. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development at the following intersections: • Grange Road/TH 100 northbound ramps • Arcadia Avenue/TH 100 southbound off ramp • Eden Avenue/W 50th Street • W 50th Street/Dale Drive • W 50th Street/Sunnyslope Road • Eden Avenue/Grange Road/Willson Road • Grange Road/W 50th Street • Eden Avenue/Normandale Road/Arcadia Avenue • Vernon Avenue/Arcadia Avenue • Vernon Avenue/TH 100 southbound ramp Proposed Development Characteristics The proposed project will involve removal of the existing building and constructing a new apartment building with 208 dwelling units. The building will also include 3,700 square feet of restaurant space on the first floor. The project includes 292 underground parking stalls and 37 surface stalls. As shown in the site plan, one access point is provided on Eden Avenue and three access points are provided on Willson Road. The project is expected to be completed in 2023. The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to add 57 net trips during the a.m. peak hour, 88 net trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 1,190 net trips daily. Net trips account for new trips generated by the development and trips eliminated by removal of the existing Perkins restaurant and office space. • The net trips added to the roadway system by the proposed development are expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. No improvements beyond those already planned by the City are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. • The residential portion of the development without the restaurant would generate fewer weekday trips than the existing restaurant and office uses during the a.m. peak hour, the p.m. peak hour, and on a daily basis. • Traffic volume data collected in 2019 for previous studies in this area was used whenever possible to avoid traffic volume reductions that have occurred due to the COVID-19 pandemic impacts. However, some intersections included in the study did April 2021 1-2 not have previous data and therefore new data was collected. This data was carefully reviewed and adjusted using data from nearby intersections to account for pandemic related traffic volume reductions. This process resulted in reasonable estimates for the weekday peak hours that would occur under non-pandemic conditions. • Under both existing and future conditions at the 50th Street/Dale Drive/City Hall access intersection, the northbound left turn from City Hall operates at LOS F and the southbound movements from Dale Drive operate at LOS E. At the 50th Street/Sunnyslope Road intersection, the southbound movements operate at LOS E in 2021 and LOS F in 2024 under both scenarios during the p.m. peak hour. While not desirable, minor street stop approaches often experience delay when accessing a major street during peak traffic periods. In this case, the minor approach volumes are very low compared to the major street volume resulting in acceptable levels of service for the overall intersection. • Under existing all-way stop conditions at the Eden Avenue/Normandale Road/Arcadia Avenue intersection, the eastbound through/right turn movement operates at LOS E. This intersection is scheduled to be reconstructed with a roundabout in 2022. Under roundabout control, all movements operate at LOS A. • Under existing and future conditions at the Grange Road/TH 100 ramps intersection, the eastbound left turn operates at LOS E under existing and future conditions during the p.m. peak hour. Additional review of vehicle queue lengths for this movement indicates adequate space exists on the exit ramp to accommodate the queue without interfering with traffic operations on TH 100. • Future plans for this area include a new primary sidewalk on Grange Road from Eden Avenue to 50th Street and on 50th Street/Vernon Avenue to Eden Avenue. Future plans for this area also include a buffered bike lane on Vernon Avenue/50th Street and Eden Avenue. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. • The project owner is encouraged to provide bicycle parking spaces to promote bicycle use by residents. Long-term spaces for residents within the building and outside racks for short-term parking are recommended. The provision of a bicycle maintenance station will also help encourage bicycle use by residents. • The proposed number of parking spaces can accommodate the expected peak parking demand based on Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) data. • The project owner is encouraged to implement Travel Demand Management strategies for this site with the goal of reducing vehicular trips during peak hours and reducing carbon emissions from vehicles. Potential strategies for this site include: o Providing maps that show the area bus routes, bus schedules, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. o Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. o Providing charging stations for electric vehicles in the resident parking areas. o Providing long-term bicycle parking spaces for apartment residents. o Providing short-term bicycle parking spaces for restaurant patrons. o Offering a pre-paid Metro Transit Go-To Card to all new residents. April 2021 1-3 • A planning level review of a future new TH 100 exit ramp at Eden Avenue and frontage road on the east side of TH 100 was completed. The review indicates traffic volume levels on Eden Avenue and Vernon Avenue would likely be similar to existing levels since the same TH 100 access movements would still exist. Traffic volumes at the new intersections on Eden Avenue and Vernon Avenue would likely be at a level requiring either traffic signal or roundabout control. • The proposed project includes an access onto Eden Avenue for the restaurant parking. This access may need to be converted to a right in/right out access in the future when the new exit ramp and frontage road are constructed. The access would likely be too close to the new exit ramp to allow for full access to continue. April 2021 2-1 2.0 Purpose and Background The purpose of this Traffic and Parking Study is to evaluate the impacts of the proposed new residential building located at 4917 Eden Avenue Edina, MN. The project site is located on the south side of Eden Avenue west of Willson Road. The proposed project location is currently occupied by a Perkins restaurant, office space, and a parking lot. The project location is shown in Figure 1. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development at the following intersections: • Grange Road/TH 100 northbound ramps • Arcadia Avenue/TH 100 southbound off ramp • Eden Avenue/W 50th Street • W 50th Street/Dale Drive/City Hall access • W 50th Street/Sunnyslope Road • Eden Avenue/Grange Road/Willson Road • Grange Road/W 50th Street • Eden Avenue/Normandale Road/Arcadia Avenue • Vernon Avenue/Arcadia Avenue • Vernon Avenue/TH 100 southbound ramp Proposed Development Characteristics The proposed project will involve removal of the existing building and constructing a new apartment building with 208 dwelling units. The building will also include 3,700 square feet of restaurant space on the first floor. The project includes 292 underground parking stalls and 37 surface stalls. As shown in the site plan, one access point is provided on Eden Avenue and three access points are provided on Willson Road. The project is expected to be completed in 2023. The current site plan is shown in Figure 2. April 2021 2-2 April 2021 2-3 April 2021 3-1 3.0 Existing Conditions The proposed site is currently occupied by a Perkins restaurant and office space. The site is bounded by Eden Avenue on the north, Willson Road to the east, an office building to the south, and TH 100 to the west. Near the site location, Eden Avenue is a two-lane local roadway. Arcadia Avenue is a north/south roadway that connects Eden Avenue and Vernon Avenue on the west side of TH 100. Grange Road is a north/south roadway that connects Eden Avenue and Vernon Avenue on the east side of TH 100. Vernon Avenue is a four-lane east/west roadway that changes to 50th Street at Grange Road. The posted speed limit on all streets in the study area is 30 miles per hour. Existing conditions at the proposed project location are shown in Figure 3 and described below. Vernon Avenue/Arcadia Avenue This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the northbound Arcadia Avenue approach. The eastbound approach provides one through/right turn lane and two through lanes. The westbound approach provides two through lanes. The northbound approach provides one right turn lane. All northbound traffic on Arcadia Avenue must turn right onto Vernon Avenue. Vernon Avenue/TH 100 southbound ramp This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound approach provides one right turn lane and two through lanes. The westbound approach provides one left turn/through lane and one through lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn lane, one shared left turn/through lane, and one channelized right turn lane. A striped crosswalk is provided on the north approach. 50th Street/Grange Road This three-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound approach provides one through/right turn lane and one through lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn/through lane and one through lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane and one right turn lane. A striped crosswalk is provided on the east leg of the intersection. 50th Street/Dale Drive/City Hall access This four-way intersection is controlled with a stop signs on the northbound City Hall access approach and the southbound Dale Drive approach. The eastbound approach provides one left turn/through lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. The westbound approach provides left turn/through lane and one through/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn/through/right turn lane. April 2021 3-2 50th Street/Eden Avenue This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the northbound Eden Avenue approach. The eastbound approach provides one through/right turn lane and one through lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane and two through lanes. The northbound approach provides one left turn/through/right turn lane. 50th Street/Sunnyslope Road This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the southbound Sunnyslope Road approach. The eastbound approach provides one through/left turn lane and one through lane. The westbound approach provides one through lane and one through/right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn/through/right turn lane. Eden Avenue/Normandale Road/Arcadia Avenue This four-way intersection is controlled with stop signs on all approaches. The eastbound and westbound approaches provide one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane. The northbound and southbound approaches provide one left turn/through/right turn lane. A striped crosswalk is provided on the south leg. This intersection is planned to be reconstructed with a roundabout in 2022. Eden Avenue/Grange Road/Willson Road This four-way intersection is controlled with stop signs on all approaches. The eastbound approach provides one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn/through/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn/through/right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn/through lane and one channelized right turn lane. Grange Road/TH 100 northbound ramps This four-way intersection is controlled with stop signs on the eastbound and westbound approaches. The eastbound approach provides one left turn lane and one right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn/through lane and one through/right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one through/right turn lane. The west leg of the intersection serves as entrance and exit ramps to northbound TH 100. The east leg serves as right in/right out access for City Hall. Arcadia Avenue/TH 100 southbound off ramp This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the westbound approach. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane and one right turn lane. The northbound and southbound approaches provide one through lane. The east leg provides access from the southbound TH 100 entrance ramp. April 2021 3-3 Traffic Volume Data Turn movement data for the following intersections was collected during the weekday a.m. (7:00 - 9:00 a.m.) and p.m. (4:00 - 6:00 p.m.) peak periods in March 2021: • Grange Road/TH 100 northbound ramps • Arcadia Avenue/TH 100 southbound off ramp • Eden Avenue/W 50th Street • W 50th Street/Dale Drive • W 50th Street/Sunnyslope Road Existing turn movement data previously collected for other studies in the area was obtained from City staff for the following intersections: • Eden Avenue/Grange Road/Willson Road • Grange Road/W 50th Street • Eden Avenue/Normandale Road/Arcadia Avenue • Vernon Avenue/Arcadia Avenue • Vernon Avenue/TH 100 southbound ramp April 2021 3-4 April 2021 4-1 4.0 Traffic Forecasts Traffic Forecast Scenarios To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project, forecasts and analyses were completed for the year 2024. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts were completed for the following scenarios: • 2021 Existing. Existing volumes were determined through traffic counts at the subject intersections. The existing volume information includes trips generated by the uses near the project site. • 2024 No-Build. Existing volumes at the subject intersections were increased by 1.0 percent per year to determine 2024 No-Build volumes. The 1.0 percent per year growth rate was calculated based on both recent growth experienced near the site and projected growth due to additional development in the area. • 2024 Build. Trips generated by the proposed development were added to the 2024 No-Build volumes to determine 2024 Build volumes. Estimation of Existing Volumes Due to COVID-19 Impacts The impacts of COVID-19 have resulted in significant reductions in traffic volumes due to changes in work and travel habits. Traffic volume data collected for studies completed prior to the pandemic was used to adjust the existing counts, resulting in reasonable estimates for the weekday peak hours that would occur under non-pandemic conditions. These volumes were used for the traffic forecasts presented in this report. Trip Generation for Proposed Project Weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip generation for the proposed development were calculated based on data presented in the tenth edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Table 4-1. April 2021 4-2 Table 4-1 Trip Generation for Proposed Project and Existing Uses Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Proposed uses Apartments 208 DU 19 56 75 56 36 92 1132 Fast Food Restaurant w/o drive-thru 3,700 SF 56 37 93 52 53 105 1281 Subtotal 75 93 168 108 89 197 2413 Existing uses to be removed Sit-down restaurant 10,073 SF 55 45 100 61 37 98 1130 Office 9,653 SF 9 2 11 2 9 11 93 Subtotal 64 47 111 63 46 109 1223 Total net trips +11 +46 +57 +45 +43 +88 +1190 DU=dwelling unit, SF=square feet As shown, the project adds 57 net trips during the a.m. peak hour, 88 net trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 1,190 net trips daily. Trip Distribution Percentages Trip distribution percentages for the subject development trips were established based on the nearby roadway network, existing and expected future traffic patterns, and location of the subject development in relation to major attractions and population concentrations. The distribution percentages for trips generated by the proposed development are as follows: • 30 percent to/from the north on TH 100 • 30 percent to/from the south on TH 100 • 20 percent to/from the east on 50th Street • 10 percent to/from the west on Eden Avenue • 5 percent to/from the west on Interlochen Boulevard • 5 percent to/from the south on Willson Road Traffic Volumes Development trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the forecasting scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The resultant traffic volumes are presented in Figures 4 and 5. April 2021 4-3 April 2021 4-4 April 2021 5-1 5.0 Traffic Analysis Intersection Level of Service Analysis Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersections for all scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours using Synchro software. Initial analysis was completed using existing geometrics and intersection control. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. The following is a detailed description of the conditions described by each LOS designation: • Level of service A corresponds to a free flow condition with motorists virtually unaffected by the intersection control mechanism. For a signalized or an unsignalized intersection, the average delay per vehicle would be approximately 10 seconds or less. • Level of service B represents stable flow with a high degree of freedom, but with some influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. For a signalized intersection, the average delay ranges from 10 to 20 seconds. An unsignalized intersection would have delays ranging from 10 to 15 seconds for this level. • Level of service C depicts a restricted flow which remains stable, but with significant influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. The general level of comfort and convenience changes noticeably at this level. The delay ranges from 20 to 35 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 15 to 25 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service D corresponds to high-density flow in which speed and freedom are significantly restricted. Though traffic flow remains stable, reductions in comfort and convenience are experienced. The control delay for this level is 35 to 55 seconds for a signalized intersection and 25 to 35 seconds for an unsignalized intersection. • Level of service E represents unstable flow of traffic at or near the capacity of the intersection with poor levels of comfort and convenience. The delay ranges from 55 to 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 35 to 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service F represents forced flow in which the volume of traffic approaching the intersection exceeds the volume that can be served. Characteristics often experienced include long queues, stop-and-go waves, poor travel times, low comfort and convenience, and increased accident exposure. Delays over 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and over 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection correspond to this level of service. April 2021 5-2 The LOS results for the study intersections are shown in Figures 5 and 6 and are discussed below. Vernon Avenue/Arcadia Avenue (minor street stop control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. Vernon Avenue/TH 100 southbound ramp (traffic signal control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS B for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS B for all scenarios. 50th Street/Grange Road (traffic signal control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. 50th Street/Dale Drive/City Hall access (minor street stop control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS D or better except the northbound left turn and the southbound movements. The northbound left turn operates at LOS F and the southbound movements operate at LOS E under all scenarios. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better except the northbound left turn and the southbound movements. The northbound left turn operates at LOS F and the southbound movements operate at LOS E under all scenarios. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. 50th Street/Eden Avenue (minor street stop control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. April 2021 5-3 During the p.m. peak hour under 2021 conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. Under 2024 No-Build and 2024 Build conditions, all movements at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. 50th Street/Sunnyslope Road (minor street stop control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2020, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better except the southbound movements. The northbound left turn operates at LOS E in 2021 and LOS F in 2024. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. Eden Avenue/Normandale Road/Arcadia Avenue (existing all-way stop control, future roundabout control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021 conditions, all movements except the eastbound through/right turn movement operate at LOS D or better. The eastbound through/right turn movement operates at LOS E. The overall intersection operates at LOS D in 2021. Under 2024 No-Build and 2024 Build conditions with roundabout control, all movements operate at LOS A. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all 2024 scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021 conditions, all movements except the eastbound through/right turn movement operate at LOS D or better. The eastbound through/right turn movement operates at LOS E. The overall intersection operates at LOS D in 2021. Under 2024 No-Build and 2024 Build conditions with roundabout control, all movements operate at LOS A. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all 2024 scenarios. Eden Avenue/Grange Road/Willson Road (all-way stop control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. Grange Road/TH 100 northbound ramps (minor street stop control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better except the eastbound left turn. The eastbound left turn operates at LOS E under all scenarios. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. April 2021 5-4 Arcadia Avenue/TH 100 southbound off ramp (minor street stop control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. Willson Road/development access (minor street stop control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS A. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2024 Build conditions, all movements at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. Eden Avenue/development access (minor street stop control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2024 Build conditions, all movements at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. Overall Traffic Impact The net number of trips added to the roadway system by the proposed development are expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. The net trips account for new trips generated by the development and trips eliminated by removal of the existing Perkins restaurant and office space. No improvements beyond those already planned by the City are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. The traffic analysis identifies the following intersections that experience level of service E of F for individual movements under both existing and future conditions: • 50th Street/Dale Drive/City Hall access • 50th Street/Sunnyslope Road • Eden Avenue/Normandale Road/Arcadia Avenue • Grange Road/TH 100 ramps At the 50th Street/Dale Drive/City Hall access intersection, the northbound left turn from City Hall operates at LOS F and the southbound movements from Dale Drive operate at LOS E. At the 50th Street/Sunnyslope Road intersection, the southbound movements operate at LOS E in 2021 and LOS F in 2024 under both scenarios during the p.m. peak hour. While not desirable, minor street stop approaches often experience delay when accessing a major street during peak traffic periods. The minor street movements must wait for an acceptable gap in traffic, resulting in additional delay and poor levels of service. In this case, the minor approach volumes are very low compared to the major street volume resulting in acceptable levels of service for the overall intersection. April 2021 5-5 At the Eden Avenue/Normandale Road/Arcadia Avenue intersection, the eastbound through/right turn movement operates at LOS E under existing all-way stop conditions. As noted earlier, this intersection is scheduled to be reconstructed with a roundabout in 2022. Under roundabout control, all movements operate at LOS A. At the Grange Road/TH 100 ramps intersection, the eastbound left turn operates at LOS E under existing and future conditions during the p.m. peak hour. Additional review of the expected vehicle queue lengths for this movement indicates adequate space exists on the exit ramp to accommodate the queue without interfering with traffic operations on TH 100. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Under existing conditions, sidewalk is provided both sides of Eden Avenue and on the west side of Willson Road. No sidewalk is provided on Grange Road. Sidewalk is provided on the entire east side of Arcadia Avenue and on the west side from the mid-way point to Vernon Avenue. Sidewalk is provided on the north side of Vernon Avenue and 50th Street through the study area. Sidewalk is provided on the south side of 50th Street from City Hall to the east. Bicycles are allowed on all the surrounding streets. Future plans for this area include a new primary sidewalk on Grange Road from Eden Avenue to 50th Street and on 50th Street/Vernon Avenue to Eden Avenue. Future plans for this area also include a buffered bike lane on Vernon Avenue/50th Street and Eden Avenue. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. The area near the project site is attractive for pedestrian and bicycle traffic. City Hall on the east side of TH 100 and the retail uses on the west side of TH 100 are popular destinations for the surrounding neighborhoods. The project owner is encouraged to provide bicycle parking spaces to promote bicycle use by residents. Long-term spaces for residents within the building and outside racks for short-term parking are recommended. The provision of a bicycle maintenance station will also help encourage bicycle use by residents. Transit Facilities The subject site presently is served by the Metro Transit bus route 46 on 50th Street. Bus stops exist on 50th Street between Grange Road and Dale Drive/City Hall access. Potential Travel Demand Management Measures The project owner is encouraged to implement Travel Demand Management strategies for this site with the goal of reducing vehicular trips during peak hours and reducing carbon emissions from vehicles. Potential strategies for this site include: • Providing maps that show the area bus routes, light rail and bus schedules, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. • Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. • Providing charging stations for electric vehicles in the resident parking areas. • Providing long-term bicycle parking spaces for apartment residents. • Providing short-term bicycle parking spaces for restaurant patrons. • Offering a pre-paid Metro Transit Go-To Card to all new residents. April 2021 5-6 Impacts of a Future New Exit Ramp Location and Frontage Road As shown in the Grandview District plan, future plans for this area include revisions to the TH 100 access ramp locations and creating a new frontage road between Eden Avenue and Vernon Avenue. This would allow for the removal of the entrance and exit ramps that currently access Grange Road at the City Hall access location. This revision would create a new intersection on Eden Avenue at the exit ramp location, which would be located immediately west of the proposed project site. In addition, a new intersection would be created on Vernon Avenue at the location of the existing northbound TH 100 entrance ramp. These revisions would result in traffic being shifted away Grange Road onto the new frontage road and intersections on Eden Avenue and Vernon Avenue. Traffic volume levels on Eden Avenue and Vernon Avenue would likely be similar to existing levels since the same TH 100 access movements would still exist. Traffic volumes at the new intersections on Eden Avenue and Vernon Avenue would likely be at a level requiring either traffic signal or roundabout control. The proposed project includes an access onto Eden Avenue for the restaurant parking. This access may need to be converted to a right in/right out access in the future when the new exit ramp and frontage road are constructed. The access would likely be too close to the new exit ramp to allow for full access to continue. April 2021 5-7 April 2021 5-8 April 2021 6-1 6.0 Parking Analysis As described earlier, the project includes 292 underground parking stalls and 37 surface stalls for a total of 329 stalls on site. The proposed amount of parking was compared to industry standards to determine adequacy. Parking data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) was used to determine the expected parking demand for the proposed land uses. Data provided in the ITE publication Parking Generation, 5th Edition, indicates the various proposed uses peak at different times during the day. The ITE data was adjusted to account for the expected modal split for the site. Based on the ITE data, the peak weekday parking demand for the overall site occurs between 6 am and 8 am. The peak parking demand during that time period is 275 spaces. The 329 spaces provided can accommodate the expected peak parking demand. April 2021 7-1 7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to add 57 net trips during the a.m. peak hour, 88 net trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 1,190 net trips daily. Net trips account for new trips generated by the development and trips eliminated by removal of the existing Perkins restaurant and office space. • The net trips added to the roadway system by the proposed development are expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. No improvements beyond those already planned by the City are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. • The residential portion of the development without the restaurant would generate fewer weekday trips than the existing restaurant and office uses during the a.m. peak hour, the p.m. peak hour, and on a daily basis. • Traffic volume data collected in 2019 for previous studies in this area was used whenever possible to avoid traffic volume reductions that have occurred due to the COVID-19 pandemic impacts. However, some intersections included in the study did not have previous data and therefore new data was collected. This data was carefully reviewed and adjusted using data from nearby intersections to account for pandemic related traffic volume reductions. This process resulted in reasonable estimates for the weekday peak hours that would occur under non-pandemic conditions. • Under both existing and future conditions at the 50th Street/Dale Drive/City Hall access intersection, the northbound left turn from City Hall operates at LOS F and the southbound movements from Dale Drive operate at LOS E. At the 50th Street/Sunnyslope Road intersection, the southbound movements operate at LOS E in 2021 and LOS F in 2024 under both scenarios during the p.m. peak hour. While not desirable, minor street stop approaches often experience delay when accessing a major street during peak traffic periods. In this case, the minor approach volumes are very low compared to the major street volume resulting in acceptable levels of service for the overall intersection. • Under existing all-way stop conditions at the Eden Avenue/Normandale Road/Arcadia Avenue intersection, the eastbound through/right turn movement operates at LOS E. This intersection is scheduled to be reconstructed with a roundabout in 2022. Under roundabout control, all movements operate at LOS A. • Under existing and future conditions at the Grange Road/TH 100 ramps intersection, the eastbound left turn operates at LOS E under existing and future conditions during the p.m. peak hour. Additional review of vehicle queue lengths for this movement indicates adequate space exists on the exit ramp to accommodate the queue without interfering with traffic operations on TH 100. April 2021 7-2 • Future plans for this area include a new primary sidewalk on Grange Road from Eden Avenue to 50th Street and on 50th Street/Vernon Avenue to Eden Avenue. Future plans for this area also include a buffered bike lane on Vernon Avenue/50th Street and Eden Avenue. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. • The project owner is encouraged to provide bicycle parking spaces to promote bicycle use by residents. Long-term spaces for residents within the building and outside racks for short-term parking are recommended. The provision of a bicycle maintenance station will also help encourage bicycle use by residents. • The proposed number of parking spaces can accommodate the expected peak parking demand based on Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) data. • The project owner is encouraged to implement Travel Demand Management strategies for this site with the goal of reducing vehicular trips during peak hours and reducing carbon emissions from vehicles. Potential strategies for this site include: o Providing maps that show the area bus routes, bus schedules, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. o Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. o Providing charging stations for electric vehicles in the resident parking areas. o Providing long-term bicycle parking spaces for apartment residents. o Providing short-term bicycle parking spaces for restaurant patrons. o Offering a pre-paid Metro Transit Go-To Card to all new residents. • A planning level review of a future new TH 100 exit ramp at Eden Avenue and frontage road on the east side of TH 100 was completed. The review indicates traffic volume levels on Eden Avenue and Vernon Avenue would likely be similar to existing levels since the same TH 100 access movements would still exist. Traffic volumes at the new intersections on Eden Avenue and Vernon Avenue would likely be at a level requiring either traffic signal or roundabout control. • The proposed project includes an access onto Eden Avenue for the restaurant parking. This access may need to be converted to a right in/right out access in the future when the new exit ramp and frontage road are constructed. The access would likely be too close to the new exit ramp to allow for full access to continue. April 2021 8-1 8.0 Appendix • Level of Service Worksheets HCM 6th TWSC 14: Arcadia & Vernon 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2021 am.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 808 31 0 758 0 76 Future Vol, veh/h 808 31 0 758 0 76 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 100 - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 878 34 0 824 0 83 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 - - - 439 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - - - 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 0 - 0 566 Stage 1 - - 0 - 0 - Stage 2 - - 0 - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - 566 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 12.4 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBT Capacity (veh/h) 566 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.146 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 12.4 - - - HCM Lane LOS B - - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 - - - HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Vernon/50th & TH 100 ramp 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2021 am.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 670 214 208 537 0 0 0 0 357 61 221 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 670 214 208 537 0 0 0 0 357 61 221 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 728 233 226 584 0 435 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 0 1914 854 336 943 0 1106 0 Arrive On Green 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 3647 1585 422 1837 0 3563 0 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 728 233 282 528 0 435 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1777 1585 557 1617 0 1781 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 7.1 4.7 22.4 13.3 0.0 5.7 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 7.1 4.7 29.4 13.3 0.0 5.7 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.00 1.00 0.80 0.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1914 854 409 871 0 1106 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.38 0.27 0.69 0.61 0.00 0.39 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 1938 864 413 882 0 1106 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 8.0 7.4 15.5 9.4 0.0 16.1 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.1 0.2 4.8 1.2 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 2.2 1.3 3.6 4.0 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 8.1 7.6 20.3 10.6 0.0 17.2 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A C B A B A Approach Vol, veh/h 961 810 435 A Approach Delay, s/veh 8.0 14.0 17.2 Approach LOS A B B Timer - Assigned Phs 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 36.6 23.0 36.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 32.5 18.5 32.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.1 7.7 31.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 6.2 1.2 0.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.0 HCM 6th LOS B Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 9: Grange & 50th 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2021 am.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 633 73 8 1220 104 127 Future Volume (veh/h) 633 73 8 1220 104 127 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 688 79 9 1326 113 138 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 1923 221 108 2079 255 227 Arrive On Green 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.14 0.14 Sat Flow, veh/h 3306 369 5 3558 1781 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 380 387 715 620 113 138 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1804 1861 1617 1781 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.8 3.8 0.0 8.7 2.0 2.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.8 3.8 8.7 8.7 2.0 2.8 Prop In Lane 0.20 0.01 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1064 1080 1219 968 255 227 V/C Ratio(X) 0.36 0.36 0.59 0.64 0.44 0.61 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1678 1703 1852 1527 925 823 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 3.6 3.6 4.5 4.6 13.7 14.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.7 1.2 2.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 0.5 1.3 1.2 0.7 1.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 3.8 3.8 5.0 5.3 14.9 16.6 LnGrp LOS A A A A B B Approach Vol, veh/h 767 1335 251 Approach Delay, s/veh 3.8 5.1 15.8 Approach LOS A A B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.5 25.4 25.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.1 32.9 32.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.8 5.8 10.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 5.3 10.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 5.8 HCM 6th LOS A HCM 6th TWSC 7: City Hall/Dale & 50th 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2021 am.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 19 699 42 12 1206 2 2 1 3 5 1 20 Future Vol, veh/h 19 699 42 12 1206 2 2 1 3 5 1 20 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - 50 - - - 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 21 760 46 13 1311 2 2 1 3 5 1 22 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1313 0 0 806 0 0 1484 2141 380 1761 2186 657 Stage 1 - - - - - - 802 802 - 1338 1338 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 682 1339 - 423 848 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 523 - - 814 - - 87 48 618 54 45 407 Stage 1 - - - - - - 344 395 - 161 220 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 406 220 - 579 376 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 523 - - 814 - - 73 42 618 48 39 407 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 73 42 - 48 39 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 319 366 - 149 207 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 360 207 - 532 349 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 0.4 39.6 35.7 HCM LOS E E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 73 140 523 - - 814 - - 145 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.03 0.031 0.039 - - 0.016 - - 0.195 HCM Control Delay (s) 55.8 31.5 12.2 0.4 - 9.5 0.3 - 35.7 HCM Lane LOS F D B A - A A - E HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.7 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Eden & 50th 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2021 am.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.9 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 703 4 203 1220 1 156 Future Vol, veh/h 703 4 203 1220 1 156 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 100 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 764 4 221 1326 1 170 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 768 0 1871 384 Stage 1 - - - - 766 - Stage 2 - - - - 1105 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 842 - 64 614 Stage 1 - - - - 419 - Stage 2 - - - - 279 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 842 - 47 614 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 47 - Stage 1 - - - - 419 - Stage 2 - - - - 206 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.5 14 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 570 - - 842 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.299 - - 0.262 - HCM Control Delay (s) 14 - - 10.8 - HCM Lane LOS B - - B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.3 - - 1.1 - HCM 6th TWSC 3: 50th & Sunnyslope 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2021 am.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 858 1414 5 1 6 Future Vol, veh/h 1 858 1414 5 1 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 933 1537 5 1 7 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1542 0 - 0 2009 771 Stage 1 - - - - 1540 - Stage 2 - - - - 469 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - - 6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - - 3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 427 - - - 51 343 Stage 1 - - - - 163 - Stage 2 - - - - 596 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 427 - - - 51 343 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 51 - Stage 1 - - - - 162 - Stage 2 - - - - 596 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 24.8 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 427 - - - 189 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - - 0.04 HCM Control Delay (s) 13.5 0 - - 24.8 HCM Lane LOS B A - - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.1 HCM 6th TWSC 16: Arcadia & TH 100 ramp 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2021 am.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 51 18 135 0 0 140 Future Vol, veh/h 51 18 135 0 0 140 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 55 20 147 0 0 152 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 299 147 0 - - - Stage 1 147 - - - - - Stage 2 152 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 692 900 - 0 0 - Stage 1 880 - - 0 0 - Stage 2 876 - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 692 900 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 692 - - - - - Stage 1 880 - - - - - Stage 2 876 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10.4 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 736 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.102 - HCM Control Delay (s) - 10.4 - HCM Lane LOS - B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.3 - HCM 6th TWSC 18: Grange & TH 100 ramp/City Hall 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2021 am.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 8.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 183 0 288 0 0 4 96 44 54 0 76 5 Future Vol, veh/h 183 0 288 0 0 4 96 44 54 0 76 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - 0 - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 199 0 313 0 0 4 104 48 59 0 83 5 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 374 401 86 528 374 78 88 0 0 - - 0 Stage 1 86 86 - 286 286 - - - - - - - Stage 2 288 315 - 242 88 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 583 538 973 461 557 983 1508 - - 0 - - Stage 1 922 824 - 721 675 - - - - 0 - - Stage 2 720 656 - 762 822 - - - - 0 - - Platoon blocked, %- - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 547 498 973 295 516 983 1508 - - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 547 498 - 295 516 - - - - - - - Stage 1 854 824 - 668 625 - - - - - - - Stage 2 664 607 - 517 822 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 12.3 8.7 3.7 0 HCM LOS B A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1508 - - 547 973 983 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.069 - - 0.364 0.322 0.004 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 0 - 15.3 10.4 8.7 - - HCM Lane LOS A A - C B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 1.7 1.4 0 - - HCM 6th AWSC 22: Normandale/Arcadia & Eden 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2021 am.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 26.7 Intersection LOS D Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 40 371 47 44 284 86 63 27 56 66 44 109 Future Vol, veh/h 40 371 47 44 284 86 63 27 56 66 44 109 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 43 403 51 48 309 93 68 29 61 72 48 118 Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 2 2 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 2 2 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 2 2 HCM Control Delay 35.9 26.4 14.3 16.3 HCM LOS E D B C Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 43% 100% 0% 100% 0% 30% Vol Thru, % 18% 0% 89% 0% 77% 20% Vol Right, % 38% 0% 11% 0% 23% 50% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 146 40 418 44 370 219 LT Vol 63 40 0 44 0 66 Through Vol 27 0 371 0 284 44 RT Vol 56 0 47 0 86 109 Lane Flow Rate 159 43 454 48 402 238 Geometry Grp 2 7 7 7 7 2 Degree of Util (X) 0.334 0.089 0.858 0.099 0.76 0.468 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.58 7.389 6.796 7.487 6.806 7.083 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 478 482 532 476 527 505 Service Time 5.58 5.176 4.582 5.277 4.597 5.183 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.333 0.089 0.853 0.101 0.763 0.471 HCM Control Delay 14.3 10.9 38.3 11.1 28.2 16.3 HCM Lane LOS B B E B D C HCM 95th-tile Q 1.5 0.3 9.1 0.3 6.7 2.5 HCM 6th AWSC 21: Willson/Grange & Eden 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2021 am.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 18.2 Intersection LOS C Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 136 105 85 44 270 3 96 55 41 35 119 210 Future Vol, veh/h 136 105 85 44 270 3 96 55 41 35 119 210 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 148 114 92 48 293 3 104 60 45 38 129 228 Number of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 2 2 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 2 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 2 HCM Control Delay 14.6 26.5 17.4 14.6 HCM LOS B D C B Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2 Vol Left, % 50% 100% 0% 14% 23% 0% Vol Thru, % 29% 0% 55% 85% 77% 0% Vol Right, % 21% 0% 45% 1% 0% 100% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 192 136 190 317 154 210 LT Vol 96 136 0 44 35 0 Through Vol 55 0 105 270 119 0 RT Vol 41 0 85 3 0 210 Lane Flow Rate 209 148 207 345 167 228 Geometry Grp 6 7 7 6 7 7 Degree of Util (X) 0.456 0.326 0.407 0.707 0.354 0.429 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.864 7.93 7.095 7.39 7.603 6.767 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 457 452 506 489 472 530 Service Time 5.946 5.705 4.869 5.461 5.375 4.539 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.457 0.327 0.409 0.706 0.354 0.43 HCM Control Delay 17.4 14.5 14.7 26.5 14.5 14.6 HCM Lane LOS C B B D B B HCM 95th-tile Q 2.3 1.4 2 5.5 1.6 2.1 HCM 6th TWSC 14: Arcadia & Vernon 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 am nb.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 832 32 0 781 0 78 Future Vol, veh/h 832 32 0 781 0 78 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 100 - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 904 35 0 849 0 85 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 - - - 452 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - - - 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 0 - 0 555 Stage 1 - - 0 - 0 - Stage 2 - - 0 - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - 555 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 12.7 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBT Capacity (veh/h) 555 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.153 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 12.7 - - - HCM Lane LOS B - - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 - - - HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Vernon/50th & TH 100 ramp 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 am nb.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 690 220 214 553 0 0 0 0 368 63 228 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 690 220 214 553 0 0 0 0 368 63 228 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 750 239 233 601 0 449 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 0 1925 859 332 939 0 1098 0 Arrive On Green 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 3647 1585 412 1820 0 3563 0 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 750 239 285 549 0 449 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1777 1585 530 1617 0 1781 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 7.4 4.9 24.8 14.1 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 7.4 4.9 32.2 14.1 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.00 1.00 0.82 0.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1925 859 396 876 0 1098 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.39 0.28 0.72 0.63 0.00 0.41 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 1925 859 396 876 0 1098 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 8.0 7.4 16.4 9.5 0.0 16.4 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.1 0.2 6.2 1.4 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 2.3 1.4 3.9 4.3 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 8.1 7.6 22.6 11.0 0.0 17.5 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A C B A B A Approach Vol, veh/h 989 834 449 A Approach Delay, s/veh 8.0 14.9 17.5 Approach LOS A B B Timer - Assigned Phs 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 37.0 23.0 37.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 32.5 18.5 32.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.4 8.0 34.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 6.4 1.2 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.4 HCM 6th LOS B Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 9: Grange & 50th 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 am nb.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 652 75 8 1257 107 131 Future Volume (veh/h) 652 75 8 1257 107 131 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 709 82 9 1366 116 142 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 1935 224 105 2094 260 231 Arrive On Green 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.15 0.15 Sat Flow, veh/h 3303 371 5 3558 1781 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 392 399 736 639 116 142 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1804 1861 1617 1781 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.0 4.0 0.0 9.3 2.1 3.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.0 4.0 9.2 9.3 2.1 3.0 Prop In Lane 0.21 0.01 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1071 1088 1224 975 260 231 V/C Ratio(X) 0.37 0.37 0.60 0.65 0.45 0.61 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1612 1637 1782 1467 920 819 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 3.6 3.6 4.7 4.7 14.0 14.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.8 1.2 2.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 0.6 1.5 1.3 0.8 1.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 3.8 3.8 5.1 5.4 15.2 17.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A B B Approach Vol, veh/h 791 1375 258 Approach Delay, s/veh 3.8 5.3 16.2 Approach LOS A A B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.7 26.1 26.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 32.5 32.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.0 6.0 11.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 5.5 10.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.0 HCM 6th LOS A HCM 6th TWSC 7: City Hall/Dale & 50th 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 am nb.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 720 43 12 1243 2 2 1 3 5 1 21 Future Vol, veh/h 20 720 43 12 1243 2 2 1 3 5 1 21 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - 50 - - - 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 22 783 47 13 1351 2 2 1 3 5 1 23 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1353 0 0 830 0 0 1529 2206 392 1814 2252 677 Stage 1 - - - - - - 827 827 - 1378 1378 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 702 1379 - 436 874 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 504 - - 798 - - 80 44 607 49 41 395 Stage 1 - - - - - - 332 384 - 152 210 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 395 210 - 569 365 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 504 - - 798 - - 66 38 607 42 35 395 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 66 38 - 42 35 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 305 353 - 140 196 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 346 196 - 518 335 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.8 0.4 43.2 39.2 HCM LOS E E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 66 128 504 - - 798 - - 134 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.033 0.034 0.043 - - 0.016 - - 0.219 HCM Control Delay (s) 61.4 34.1 12.5 0.5 - 9.6 0.3 - 39.2 HCM Lane LOS F D B A - A A - E HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 0.1 - - 0.1 - - 0.8 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Eden & 50th 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 am nb.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 724 4 209 1257 1 161 Future Vol, veh/h 724 4 209 1257 1 161 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 100 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 787 4 227 1366 1 175 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 791 0 1926 396 Stage 1 - - - - 789 - Stage 2 - - - - 1137 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 825 - 58 603 Stage 1 - - - - 408 - Stage 2 - - - - 268 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 825 - 42 603 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 42 - Stage 1 - - - - 408 - Stage 2 - - - - 194 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.6 14.4 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 557 - - 825 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.316 - - 0.275 - HCM Control Delay (s) 14.4 - - 11 - HCM Lane LOS B - - B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.3 - - 1.1 - HCM 6th TWSC 3: 50th & Sunnyslope 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 am nb.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 884 1457 5 1 6 Future Vol, veh/h 1 884 1457 5 1 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 961 1584 5 1 7 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1589 0 - 0 2070 795 Stage 1 - - - - 1587 - Stage 2 - - - - 483 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - - 6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - - 3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 409 - - - 47 330 Stage 1 - - - - 153 - Stage 2 - - - - 586 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 409 - - - 47 330 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 47 - Stage 1 - - - - 152 - Stage 2 - - - - 586 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 26.3 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 409 - - - 177 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - - 0.043 HCM Control Delay (s) 13.8 0 - - 26.3 HCM Lane LOS B A - - D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.1 HCM 6th TWSC 16: Arcadia & TH 100 ramp 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 am nb.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 53 19 139 0 0 144 Future Vol, veh/h 53 19 139 0 0 144 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 58 21 151 0 0 157 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 308 151 0 - - - Stage 1 151 - - - - - Stage 2 157 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 684 895 - 0 0 - Stage 1 877 - - 0 0 - Stage 2 871 - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 684 895 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 684 - - - - - Stage 1 877 - - - - - Stage 2 871 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10.5 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 729 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.107 - HCM Control Delay (s) - 10.5 - HCM Lane LOS - B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.4 - HCM 6th TWSC 18: Grange & TH 100 ramp/City Hall 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 am nb.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 189 0 297 0 0 4 99 45 56 0 78 5 Future Vol, veh/h 189 0 297 0 0 4 99 45 56 0 78 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - 0 - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 205 0 323 0 0 4 108 49 61 0 85 5 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 386 414 88 545 386 80 90 0 0 - - 0 Stage 1 88 88 - 296 296 - - - - - - - Stage 2 298 326 - 249 90 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 573 529 970 449 548 980 1505 - - 0 - - Stage 1 920 822 - 712 668 - - - - 0 - - Stage 2 711 648 - 755 820 - - - - 0 - - Platoon blocked, %- - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 537 488 970 282 506 980 1505 - - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 537 488 - 282 506 - - - - - - - Stage 1 849 822 - 657 617 - - - - - - - Stage 2 653 598 - 504 820 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 12.6 8.7 3.8 0 HCM LOS B A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1505 - - 537 970 980 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.072 - - 0.383 0.333 0.004 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 0 - 15.8 10.6 8.7 - - HCM Lane LOS A A - C B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 1.8 1.5 0 - - HCM 6th Roundabout 22: Normandale/Arcadia & Eden 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 am nb.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.5 Intersection LOS A Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 512 464 164 245 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 522 473 167 249 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 175 149 544 446 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 520 562 153 176 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 8.0 7.1 6.9 7.3 Approach LOS A A A A Lane Left Left Left Left Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 522 473 167 249 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 1154 1185 792 876 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.980 0.980 0.984 0.984 Flow Entry, veh/h 512 464 164 245 Cap Entry, veh/h 1132 1162 780 862 V/C Ratio 0.452 0.399 0.211 0.284 Control Delay, s/veh 8.0 7.1 6.9 7.3 LOS A A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 2 2 1 1 HCM 6th AWSC 21: Willson/Grange & Eden 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 am nb.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 19.4 Intersection LOS C Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 139 108 88 45 278 3 99 57 42 36 123 216 Future Vol, veh/h 139 108 88 45 278 3 99 57 42 36 123 216 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 151 117 96 49 302 3 108 62 46 39 134 235 Number of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 2 2 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 2 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 2 HCM Control Delay 15.2 29.2 18.3 15.2 HCM LOS C D C C Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2 Vol Left, % 50% 100% 0% 14% 23% 0% Vol Thru, % 29% 0% 55% 85% 77% 0% Vol Right, % 21% 0% 45% 1% 0% 100% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 198 139 196 326 159 216 LT Vol 99 139 0 45 36 0 Through Vol 57 0 108 278 123 0 RT Vol 42 0 88 3 0 216 Lane Flow Rate 215 151 213 354 173 235 Geometry Grp 6 7 7 6 7 7 Degree of Util (X) 0.479 0.339 0.428 0.74 0.371 0.45 Departure Headway (Hd) 8.018 8.071 7.233 7.519 7.735 6.899 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 448 444 496 478 463 519 Service Time 6.111 5.853 5.015 5.597 5.516 4.68 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.48 0.34 0.429 0.741 0.374 0.453 HCM Control Delay 18.3 15 15.4 29.2 15.1 15.3 HCM Lane LOS C B C D C C HCM 95th-tile Q 2.5 1.5 2.1 6.1 1.7 2.3 HCM 6th TWSC 14: Arcadia & Vernon 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 am b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 832 33 0 784 0 78 Future Vol, veh/h 832 33 0 784 0 78 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 100 - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 904 36 0 852 0 85 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 - - - 452 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - - - 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 0 - 0 555 Stage 1 - - 0 - 0 - Stage 2 - - 0 - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - 555 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 12.7 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBT Capacity (veh/h) 555 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.153 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 12.7 - - - HCM Lane LOS B - - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 - - - HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Vernon/50th & TH 100 ramp 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 am b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 690 220 214 556 0 0 0 0 372 63 228 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 690 220 214 556 0 0 0 0 372 63 228 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 750 239 233 604 0 453 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 0 1925 859 332 941 0 1098 0 Arrive On Green 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 3647 1585 412 1822 0 3563 0 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 750 239 286 551 0 453 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1777 1585 532 1617 0 1781 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 7.4 4.9 24.8 14.2 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 7.4 4.9 32.2 14.2 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.00 1.00 0.81 0.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1925 859 397 876 0 1098 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.39 0.28 0.72 0.63 0.00 0.41 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 1925 859 397 876 0 1098 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 8.0 7.4 16.4 9.6 0.0 16.4 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.1 0.2 6.3 1.4 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 2.3 1.4 4.0 4.3 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 8.1 7.6 22.6 11.0 0.0 17.6 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A C B A B A Approach Vol, veh/h 989 837 453 A Approach Delay, s/veh 8.0 15.0 17.6 Approach LOS A B B Timer - Assigned Phs 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 37.0 23.0 37.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 32.5 18.5 32.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.4 8.0 34.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 6.4 1.3 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.5 HCM 6th LOS B Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 9: Grange & 50th 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 am b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 652 79 8 1257 110 134 Future Volume (veh/h) 652 79 8 1257 110 134 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 709 86 9 1366 120 146 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 1918 233 104 2088 266 236 Arrive On Green 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.15 0.15 Sat Flow, veh/h 3284 387 5 3558 1781 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 395 400 736 639 120 146 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1801 1861 1617 1781 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.1 4.1 0.0 9.4 2.2 3.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.1 4.1 9.3 9.4 2.2 3.1 Prop In Lane 0.21 0.01 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1068 1083 1220 972 266 236 V/C Ratio(X) 0.37 0.37 0.60 0.66 0.45 0.62 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1602 1624 1770 1458 914 813 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 3.7 3.7 4.7 4.7 14.0 14.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.8 1.2 2.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 0.6 1.5 1.4 0.8 1.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 3.9 3.9 5.2 5.5 15.2 17.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A B B Approach Vol, veh/h 795 1375 266 Approach Delay, s/veh 3.9 5.3 16.2 Approach LOS A A B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.9 26.2 26.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 32.5 32.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.1 6.1 11.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 5.5 10.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.1 HCM 6th LOS A HCM 6th TWSC 7: City Hall/Dale & 50th 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 am b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 723 43 12 1243 2 2 1 3 5 1 21 Future Vol, veh/h 20 723 43 12 1243 2 2 1 3 5 1 21 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - 50 - - - 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 22 786 47 13 1351 2 2 1 3 5 1 23 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1353 0 0 833 0 0 1532 2209 393 1816 2255 677 Stage 1 - - - - - - 830 830 - 1378 1378 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 702 1379 - 438 877 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 504 - - 796 - - 80 44 606 49 41 395 Stage 1 - - - - - - 331 383 - 152 210 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 395 210 - 567 364 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 504 - - 796 - - 66 38 606 42 35 395 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 66 38 - 42 35 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 304 352 - 140 196 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 346 196 - 516 334 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.8 0.4 43.2 39.2 HCM LOS E E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 66 128 504 - - 796 - - 134 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.033 0.034 0.043 - - 0.016 - - 0.219 HCM Control Delay (s) 61.4 34.1 12.5 0.5 - 9.6 0.3 - 39.2 HCM Lane LOS F D B A - A A - E HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 0.1 - - 0.1 - - 0.8 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Eden & 50th 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 am b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 727 4 210 1257 1 166 Future Vol, veh/h 727 4 210 1257 1 166 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 100 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 790 4 228 1366 1 180 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 794 0 1931 397 Stage 1 - - - - 792 - Stage 2 - - - - 1139 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 823 - 58 602 Stage 1 - - - - 407 - Stage 2 - - - - 267 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 823 - 42 602 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 42 - Stage 1 - - - - 407 - Stage 2 - - - - 193 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.6 14.6 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 557 - - 823 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.326 - - 0.277 - HCM Control Delay (s) 14.6 - - 11 - HCM Lane LOS B - - B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.4 - - 1.1 - HCM 6th TWSC 3: 50th & Sunnyslope 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 am b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 892 1458 5 1 6 Future Vol, veh/h 1 892 1458 5 1 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 970 1585 5 1 7 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1590 0 - 0 2075 795 Stage 1 - - - - 1588 - Stage 2 - - - - 487 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - - 6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - - 3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 409 - - - 46 330 Stage 1 - - - - 153 - Stage 2 - - - - 583 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 409 - - - 46 330 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 46 - Stage 1 - - - - 152 - Stage 2 - - - - 583 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 26.5 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 409 - - - 175 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - - 0.043 HCM Control Delay (s) 13.8 0 - - 26.5 HCM Lane LOS B A - - D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.1 HCM 6th TWSC 16: Arcadia & TH 100 ramp 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 am b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 53 19 139 0 0 145 Future Vol, veh/h 53 19 139 0 0 145 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 58 21 151 0 0 158 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 309 151 0 - - - Stage 1 151 - - - - - Stage 2 158 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 683 895 - 0 0 - Stage 1 877 - - 0 0 - Stage 2 871 - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 683 895 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 683 - - - - - Stage 1 877 - - - - - Stage 2 871 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10.5 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 729 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.107 - HCM Control Delay (s) - 10.5 - HCM Lane LOS - B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.4 - HCM 6th TWSC 18: Grange & TH 100 ramp/City Hall 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 am b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 9.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 189 0 301 0 0 4 113 51 56 0 82 5 Future Vol, veh/h 189 0 301 0 0 4 113 51 56 0 82 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - 0 - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 205 0 327 0 0 4 123 55 61 0 89 5 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 426 454 92 587 426 86 94 0 0 - - 0 Stage 1 92 92 - 332 332 - - - - - - - Stage 2 334 362 - 255 94 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 539 502 965 421 520 973 1500 - - 0 - - Stage 1 915 819 - 681 644 - - - - 0 - - Stage 2 680 625 - 749 817 - - - - 0 - - Platoon blocked, %- - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 500 458 965 259 474 973 1500 - - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 500 458 - 259 474 - - - - - - - Stage 1 834 819 - 621 587 - - - - - - - Stage 2 617 570 - 495 817 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 13.1 8.7 3.9 0 HCM LOS B A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1500 - - 500 965 973 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.082 - - 0.411 0.339 0.004 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 0 - 17.1 10.6 8.7 - - HCM Lane LOS A A - C B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - 2 1.5 0 - - HCM 2010 Roundabout 22: Normandale/Arcadia & Eden 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 am b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 10.2 Intersection LOS B Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 512 469 164 246 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 522 478 167 250 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 176 149 545 451 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 525 563 153 176 Follow-Up Headway, s 3.186 3.186 3.186 3.186 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 11.3 9.8 8.8 9.5 Approach LOS B A A A Lane Left Left Left Left Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Critical Headway, s 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 Entry Flow, veh/h 522 478 167 250 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 948 974 655 720 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.980 0.980 0.984 0.984 Flow Entry, veh/h 512 469 164 246 Cap Entry, veh/h 929 954 645 708 V/C Ratio 0.551 0.491 0.255 0.347 Control Delay, s/veh 11.3 9.8 8.8 9.5 LOS B A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 3 3 1 2 HCM 6th AWSC 21: Willson/Grange & Eden 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 am b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 22.7 Intersection LOS C Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 145 110 102 43 278 3 124 72 45 36 114 233 Future Vol, veh/h 145 110 102 43 278 3 124 72 45 36 114 233 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 158 120 111 47 302 3 135 78 49 39 124 253 Number of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 2 2 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 2 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 2 HCM Control Delay 17.1 34.9 23.9 17 HCM LOS C D C C Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2 Vol Left, % 51% 100% 0% 13% 24% 0% Vol Thru, % 30% 0% 52% 86% 76% 0% Vol Right, % 19% 0% 48% 1% 0% 100% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 241 145 212 324 150 233 LT Vol 124 145 0 43 36 0 Through Vol 72 0 110 278 114 0 RT Vol 45 0 102 3 0 233 Lane Flow Rate 262 158 230 352 163 253 Geometry Grp 6 7 7 6 7 7 Degree of Util (X) 0.611 0.374 0.492 0.786 0.371 0.517 Departure Headway (Hd) 8.397 8.546 7.682 8.039 8.2 7.353 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 430 421 470 451 439 491 Service Time 6.453 6.298 5.433 6.09 5.951 5.103 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.609 0.375 0.489 0.78 0.371 0.515 HCM Control Delay 23.9 16.3 17.7 34.9 15.7 17.8 HCM Lane LOS C C C D C C HCM 95th-tile Q 4 1.7 2.7 7 1.7 2.9 HCM 6th TWSC 28: access & Eden 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 am b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 347 7 49 615 15 22 Future Vol, veh/h 347 7 49 615 15 22 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 377 8 53 668 16 24 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 385 0 1155 381 Stage 1 - - - - 381 - Stage 2 - - - - 774 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1173 - 218 666 Stage 1 - - - - 691 - Stage 2 - - - - 455 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1173 - 202 666 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 202 - Stage 1 - - - - 691 - Stage 2 - - - - 422 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.6 16.8 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 345 - - 1173 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.117 - - 0.045 - HCM Control Delay (s) 16.8 - - 8.2 0 HCM Lane LOS C - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - - 0.1 - HCM 6th TWSC 14: Arcadia & Vernon 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2021 pm.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 1050 37 0 858 0 165 Future Vol, veh/h 1050 37 0 858 0 165 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 100 - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1141 40 0 933 0 179 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 - - - 571 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - - - 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 0 - 0 464 Stage 1 - - 0 - 0 - Stage 2 - - 0 - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - 464 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 17.6 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBT Capacity (veh/h) 464 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.387 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 17.6 - - - HCM Lane LOS C - - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.8 - - - HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Vernon/50th & TH 100 ramp 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2021 pm.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 940 266 177 507 0 0 0 0 635 53 351 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 940 266 177 507 0 0 0 0 635 53 351 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 1022 289 192 551 0 731 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 0 1806 806 238 850 0 1217 0 Arrive On Green 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 3647 1585 247 1757 0 3563 0 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 1022 289 220 523 0 731 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1777 1585 302 1617 0 1781 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 11.9 6.6 18.6 14.1 0.0 10.2 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 11.9 6.6 30.5 14.1 0.0 10.2 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.00 1.00 0.87 0.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1806 806 266 822 0 1217 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.57 0.36 0.83 0.64 0.00 0.60 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 1806 806 266 822 0 1217 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 10.2 8.9 22.6 10.7 0.0 16.4 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.4 0.3 19.2 1.6 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 3.9 1.9 4.4 4.5 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 10.6 9.1 41.9 12.3 0.0 18.6 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A B A D B A B A Approach Vol, veh/h 1311 743 731 A Approach Delay, s/veh 10.3 21.1 18.6 Approach LOS B C B Timer - Assigned Phs 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 35.0 25.0 35.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.5 20.5 30.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 13.9 12.2 32.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 7.8 2.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.3 HCM 6th LOS B Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 9: Grange & 50th 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2021 pm.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1197 72 4 790 226 194 Future Volume (veh/h) 1197 72 4 790 226 194 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1301 78 4 859 246 211 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 1935 116 93 1974 367 326 Arrive On Green 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.21 0.21 Sat Flow, veh/h 3500 204 3 3559 1781 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 677 702 462 401 246 211 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1834 1860 1617 1781 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 10.6 10.7 0.0 5.7 5.1 4.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.6 10.7 5.6 5.7 5.1 4.9 Prop In Lane 0.11 0.01 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1009 1042 1148 919 367 326 V/C Ratio(X) 0.67 0.67 0.40 0.44 0.67 0.65 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1450 1497 1597 1320 828 737 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.0 6.0 4.9 4.9 14.6 14.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.8 0.2 0.3 2.1 2.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.3 2.4 1.2 1.1 1.9 1.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 6.8 6.8 5.2 5.3 16.7 16.6 LnGrp LOS A A A A B B Approach Vol, veh/h 1379 863 457 Approach Delay, s/veh 6.8 5.2 16.7 Approach LOS A A B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.7 27.1 27.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 32.5 32.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.1 12.7 7.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 10.0 6.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.0 HCM 6th LOS A HCM 6th TWSC 7: City Hall/Dale & 50th 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2021 pm.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 24 1348 19 6 749 3 22 1 25 7 1 23 Future Vol, veh/h 24 1348 19 6 749 3 22 1 25 7 1 23 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - 50 - - - 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 26 1465 21 7 814 3 24 1 27 8 1 25 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 817 0 0 1486 0 0 1939 2348 733 1615 2368 409 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1517 1517 - 830 830 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 422 831 - 785 1538 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 807 - - 448 - - 39 36 363 69 35 592 Stage 1 - - - - - - 125 180 - 331 383 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 580 383 - 352 176 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 807 - - 448 - - 30 28 363 52 28 592 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 30 28 - 52 28 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 102 146 - 269 372 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 538 372 - 263 143 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1 0.3 145.3 36.4 HCM LOS F E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 30 249 807 - - 448 - - 148 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.797 0.113 0.032 - - 0.015 - - 0.228 HCM Control Delay (s) 291.8 21.3 9.6 0.9 - 13.2 0.2 - 36.4 HCM Lane LOS F C A A - B A - E HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.6 0.4 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.8 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Eden & 50th 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2021 pm.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 1372 8 125 758 1 117 Future Vol, veh/h 1372 8 125 758 1 117 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 100 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1491 9 136 824 1 127 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1500 0 2180 750 Stage 1 - - - - 1496 - Stage 2 - - - - 684 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 443 - 39 354 Stage 1 - - - - 172 - Stage 2 - - - - 462 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 443 - 27 354 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 27 - Stage 1 - - - - 172 - Stage 2 - - - - 320 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.4 23.5 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 321 - - 443 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.4 - - 0.307 - HCM Control Delay (s) 23.5 - - 16.7 - HCM Lane LOS C - - C - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.9 - - 1.3 - HCM 6th TWSC 3: 50th & Sunnyslope 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2021 pm.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 1487 880 11 7 3 Future Vol, veh/h 2 1487 880 11 7 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 1616 957 12 8 3 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 969 0 - 0 1775 485 Stage 1 - - - - 963 - Stage 2 - - - - 812 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - - 6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - - 3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 707 - - - 74 528 Stage 1 - - - - 331 - Stage 2 - - - - 397 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 707 - - - 72 528 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 72 - Stage 1 - - - - 322 - Stage 2 - - - - 397 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 46.7 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 707 - - - 97 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - - 0.112 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.1 0.1 - - 46.7 HCM Lane LOS B A - - E HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.4 HCM 6th TWSC 16: Arcadia & TH 100 ramp 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2021 pm.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.6 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 61 28 131 0 0 136 Future Vol, veh/h 61 28 131 0 0 136 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 66 30 142 0 0 148 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 290 142 0 - - - Stage 1 142 - - - - - Stage 2 148 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 701 906 - 0 0 - Stage 1 885 - - 0 0 - Stage 2 880 - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 701 906 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 701 - - - - - Stage 1 885 - - - - - Stage 2 880 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10.5 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 755 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.128 - HCM Control Delay (s) - 10.5 - HCM Lane LOS - B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.4 - HCM 6th TWSC 18: Grange & TH 100 ramp/City Hall 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2021 pm.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 19.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 329 0 200 0 0 22 145 69 25 0 66 10 Future Vol, veh/h 329 0 200 0 0 22 145 69 25 0 66 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - 0 - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 358 0 217 0 0 24 158 75 27 0 72 11 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 495 496 78 591 488 89 83 0 0 - - 0 Stage 1 78 78 - 405 405 - - - - - - - Stage 2 417 418 - 186 83 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 485 475 983 419 480 969 1514 - - 0 - - Stage 1 931 830 - 622 598 - - - - 0 - - Stage 2 613 591 - 816 826 - - - - 0 - - Platoon blocked, %- - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 433 422 983 299 427 969 1514 - - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 433 422 - 299 427 - - - - - - - Stage 1 828 830 - 553 532 - - - - - - - Stage 2 532 525 - 636 826 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 29.9 8.8 4.6 0 HCM LOS D A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1514 - - 433 983 969 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.104 - - 0.826 0.221 0.025 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 0 - 42.1 9.7 8.8 - - HCM Lane LOS A A - E A A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - 7.8 0.8 0.1 - - HCM 6th AWSC 22: Normandale/Arcadia & Eden 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2021 pm.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 26.1 Intersection LOS D Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 36 363 50 49 167 60 79 35 58 88 108 103 Future Vol, veh/h 36 363 50 49 167 60 79 35 58 88 108 103 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 39 395 54 53 182 65 86 38 63 96 117 112 Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 2 2 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 2 2 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 2 2 HCM Control Delay 39.5 16.4 15.2 21.3 HCM LOS E C C C Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 46% 100% 0% 100% 0% 29% Vol Thru, % 20% 0% 88% 0% 74% 36% Vol Right, % 34% 0% 12% 0% 26% 34% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 172 36 413 49 227 299 LT Vol 79 36 0 49 0 88 Through Vol 35 0 363 0 167 108 RT Vol 58 0 50 0 60 103 Lane Flow Rate 187 39 449 53 247 325 Geometry Grp 2 7 7 7 7 2 Degree of Util (X) 0.388 0.083 0.879 0.119 0.504 0.632 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.479 7.653 7.052 8.066 7.358 6.998 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 480 470 516 444 489 517 Service Time 5.54 5.376 4.775 5.819 5.111 5.019 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.39 0.083 0.87 0.119 0.505 0.629 HCM Control Delay 15.2 11.1 42 11.9 17.4 21.3 HCM Lane LOS C B E B C C HCM 95th-tile Q 1.8 0.3 9.7 0.4 2.8 4.4 HCM 6th AWSC 21: Willson/Grange & Eden 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2021 pm.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 16.9 Intersection LOS C Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 97 124 90 50 170 10 96 132 72 33 106 127 Future Vol, veh/h 97 124 90 50 170 10 96 132 72 33 106 127 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 105 135 98 54 185 11 104 143 78 36 115 138 Number of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 2 2 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 2 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 2 HCM Control Delay 14.5 18.3 22.3 12.6 HCM LOS B C C B Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2 Vol Left, % 32% 100% 0% 22% 24% 0% Vol Thru, % 44% 0% 58% 74% 76% 0% Vol Right, % 24% 0% 42% 4% 0% 100% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 300 97 214 230 139 127 LT Vol 96 97 0 50 33 0 Through Vol 132 0 124 170 106 0 RT Vol 72 0 90 10 0 127 Lane Flow Rate 326 105 233 250 151 138 Geometry Grp 6 7 7 6 7 7 Degree of Util (X) 0.645 0.227 0.448 0.517 0.313 0.253 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.116 7.744 6.93 7.441 7.45 6.609 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 505 463 519 483 480 541 Service Time 5.178 5.509 4.695 5.509 5.217 4.377 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.646 0.227 0.449 0.518 0.315 0.255 HCM Control Delay 22.3 12.8 15.2 18.3 13.6 11.6 HCM Lane LOS C B C C B B HCM 95th-tile Q 4.5 0.9 2.3 2.9 1.3 1 HCM 6th TWSC 14: Arcadia & Vernon 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 pm nb.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 1082 38 0 884 0 170 Future Vol, veh/h 1082 38 0 884 0 170 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 100 - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1176 41 0 961 0 185 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 - - - 588 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - - - 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 0 - 0 452 Stage 1 - - 0 - 0 - Stage 2 - - 0 - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - 452 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 18.4 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBT Capacity (veh/h) 452 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.409 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 18.4 - - - HCM Lane LOS C - - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2 - - - HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Vernon/50th & TH 100 ramp 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 pm nb.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 968 274 182 522 0 0 0 0 654 55 362 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 968 274 182 522 0 0 0 0 654 55 362 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 1052 298 198 567 0 754 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 0 1806 806 232 843 0 1217 0 Arrive On Green 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 3647 1585 234 1744 0 3563 0 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 1052 298 222 543 0 754 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1777 1585 276 1617 0 1781 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 12.4 6.8 18.1 14.9 0.0 10.6 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 12.4 6.8 30.5 14.9 0.0 10.6 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.00 1.00 0.89 0.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1806 806 254 822 0 1217 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.58 0.37 0.87 0.66 0.00 0.62 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 1806 806 254 822 0 1217 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 10.3 8.9 23.6 10.9 0.0 16.5 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.5 0.3 26.5 2.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 4.1 2.0 4.9 4.8 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 10.8 9.2 50.1 12.9 0.0 18.9 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A B A D B A B A Approach Vol, veh/h 1350 765 754 A Approach Delay, s/veh 10.4 23.7 18.9 Approach LOS B C B Timer - Assigned Phs 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 35.0 25.0 35.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.5 20.5 30.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.4 12.6 32.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 7.9 2.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 16.2 HCM 6th LOS B Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 9: Grange & 50th 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 pm nb.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1233 74 4 814 233 200 Future Volume (veh/h) 1233 74 4 814 233 200 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1340 80 4 885 253 217 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 1951 116 90 1989 371 330 Arrive On Green 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.21 0.21 Sat Flow, veh/h 3501 203 3 3559 1781 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 697 723 476 413 253 217 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1834 1860 1617 1781 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.3 11.4 0.0 6.0 5.4 5.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.3 11.4 6.0 6.0 5.4 5.2 Prop In Lane 0.11 0.01 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1017 1050 1153 926 371 330 V/C Ratio(X) 0.69 0.69 0.41 0.45 0.68 0.66 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1406 1451 1549 1280 803 714 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.2 6.2 5.0 5.0 15.0 14.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.8 0.2 0.3 2.2 2.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.5 2.6 1.3 1.2 2.0 1.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 7.0 7.0 5.3 5.4 17.2 17.1 LnGrp LOS A A A A B B Approach Vol, veh/h 1420 889 470 Approach Delay, s/veh 7.0 5.3 17.2 Approach LOS A A B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.0 28.0 28.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 32.5 32.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.4 13.4 8.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 10.1 6.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.2 HCM 6th LOS A HCM 6th TWSC 7: City Hall/Dale & 50th 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 pm nb.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 1389 20 6 772 3 23 1 26 7 1 24 Future Vol, veh/h 25 1389 20 6 772 3 23 1 26 7 1 24 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - 50 - - - 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 27 1510 22 7 839 3 25 1 28 8 1 26 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 842 0 0 1532 0 0 1998 2420 755 1665 2441 421 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1564 1564 - 855 855 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 434 856 - 810 1586 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 789 - - 430 - - 35 32 351 63 31 581 Stage 1 - - - - - - 117 171 - 319 373 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 570 373 - 340 166 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 789 - - 430 - - 26 24 351 45 23 581 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 26 24 - 45 23 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 90 131 - 245 361 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 526 361 - 238 127 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.2 0.3 186.9 41.4 HCM LOS F E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 26 233 789 - - 430 - - 133 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.962 0.126 0.034 - - 0.015 - - 0.262 HCM Control Delay (s) $ 379.7 22.7 9.7 1.1 - 13.5 0.2 - 41.4 HCM Lane LOS F C A A - B A - E HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 3 0.4 0.1 - - 0 - - 1 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Eden & 50th 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 pm nb.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.2 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 1414 8 129 781 1 121 Future Vol, veh/h 1414 8 129 781 1 121 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 100 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1537 9 140 849 1 132 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1546 0 2247 773 Stage 1 - - - - 1542 - Stage 2 - - - - 705 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 425 - 35 342 Stage 1 - - - - 162 - Stage 2 - - - - 451 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 425 - 23 342 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 23 - Stage 1 - - - - 162 - Stage 2 - - - - 303 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.5 25.4 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 307 - - 425 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.432 - - 0.33 - HCM Control Delay (s) 25.4 - - 17.6 - HCM Lane LOS D - - C - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.1 - - 1.4 - HCM 6th TWSC 3: 50th & Sunnyslope 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 pm nb.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 1532 907 11 7 3 Future Vol, veh/h 2 1532 907 11 7 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 1665 986 12 8 3 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 998 0 - 0 1829 499 Stage 1 - - - - 992 - Stage 2 - - - - 837 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - - 6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - - 3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 689 - - - 68 517 Stage 1 - - - - 320 - Stage 2 - - - - 385 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 689 - - - 65 517 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 65 - Stage 1 - - - - 308 - Stage 2 - - - - 385 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0 51.6 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 689 - - - 88 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - - 0.124 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.2 0.2 - - 51.6 HCM Lane LOS B A - - F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.4 HCM 6th TWSC 16: Arcadia & TH 100 ramp 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 pm nb.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.7 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 63 29 135 0 0 140 Future Vol, veh/h 63 29 135 0 0 140 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 68 32 147 0 0 152 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 299 147 0 - - - Stage 1 147 - - - - - Stage 2 152 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 692 900 - 0 0 - Stage 1 880 - - 0 0 - Stage 2 876 - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 692 900 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 692 - - - - - Stage 1 880 - - - - - Stage 2 876 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10.6 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 746 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.134 - HCM Control Delay (s) - 10.6 - HCM Lane LOS - B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.5 - HCM 6th TWSC 18: Grange & TH 100 ramp/City Hall 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 pm nb.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 22.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 339 0 206 0 0 23 149 71 26 0 68 10 Future Vol, veh/h 339 0 206 0 0 23 149 71 26 0 68 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - 0 - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 368 0 224 0 0 25 162 77 28 0 74 11 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 508 509 80 607 500 91 85 0 0 - - 0 Stage 1 80 80 - 415 415 - - - - - - - Stage 2 428 429 - 192 85 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 475 467 980 408 473 967 1512 - - 0 - - Stage 1 929 828 - 615 592 - - - - 0 - - Stage 2 605 584 - 810 824 - - - - 0 - - Platoon blocked, %- - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 422 414 980 287 419 967 1512 - - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 422 414 - 287 419 - - - - - - - Stage 1 823 828 - 545 525 - - - - - - - Stage 2 522 517 - 625 824 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 34.5 8.8 4.6 0 HCM LOS D A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1512 - - 422 980 967 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.107 - - 0.873 0.228 0.026 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 0 - 49.5 9.8 8.8 - - HCM Lane LOS A A - E A A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - - 8.9 0.9 0.1 - - HCM 6th Roundabout 22: Normandale/Arcadia & Eden 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 pm nb.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.8 Intersection LOS A Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 504 308 192 335 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 514 314 196 341 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 279 171 557 336 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 398 582 236 149 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 9.4 5.7 7.5 7.5 Approach LOS A A A A Lane Left Left Left Left Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 514 314 196 341 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 1038 1159 782 980 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.980 0.982 0.981 0.981 Flow Entry, veh/h 504 308 192 335 Cap Entry, veh/h 1018 1138 767 961 V/C Ratio 0.495 0.271 0.251 0.348 Control Delay, s/veh 9.4 5.7 7.5 7.5 LOS A A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 3 1 1 2 HCM 6th AWSC 21: Willson/Grange & Eden 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 pm nb.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 18 Intersection LOS C Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 100 128 93 52 175 10 99 136 74 34 109 131 Future Vol, veh/h 100 128 93 52 175 10 99 136 74 34 109 131 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 109 139 101 57 190 11 108 148 80 37 118 142 Number of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 2 2 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 2 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 2 HCM Control Delay 15.1 19.4 24.2 13.1 HCM LOS C C C B Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2 Vol Left, % 32% 100% 0% 22% 24% 0% Vol Thru, % 44% 0% 58% 74% 76% 0% Vol Right, % 24% 0% 42% 4% 0% 100% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 309 100 221 237 143 131 LT Vol 99 100 0 52 34 0 Through Vol 136 0 128 175 109 0 RT Vol 74 0 93 10 0 131 Lane Flow Rate 336 109 240 258 155 142 Geometry Grp 6 7 7 6 7 7 Degree of Util (X) 0.676 0.238 0.471 0.543 0.328 0.267 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.248 7.881 7.066 7.587 7.595 6.753 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 497 454 507 474 473 530 Service Time 5.316 5.653 4.837 5.662 5.368 4.526 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.676 0.24 0.473 0.544 0.328 0.268 HCM Control Delay 24.2 13.1 16 19.4 14.1 12 HCM Lane LOS C B C C B B HCM 95th-tile Q 5 0.9 2.5 3.2 1.4 1.1 HCM 6th TWSC 14: Arcadia & Vernon 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 pm b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 1083 40 0 887 0 170 Future Vol, veh/h 1083 40 0 887 0 170 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 100 - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1177 43 0 964 0 185 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 - - - 589 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - - - 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 0 - 0 452 Stage 1 - - 0 - 0 - Stage 2 - - 0 - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - 452 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 18.4 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBT Capacity (veh/h) 452 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.409 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 18.4 - - - HCM Lane LOS C - - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2 - - - HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Vernon/50th & TH 100 ramp 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 pm b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 969 274 182 525 0 0 0 0 668 55 362 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 969 274 182 525 0 0 0 0 668 55 362 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 1053 298 198 571 0 769 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 0 1806 806 232 845 0 1217 0 Arrive On Green 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 3647 1585 233 1746 0 3563 0 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 1053 298 223 546 0 769 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1777 1585 277 1617 0 1781 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 12.4 6.8 18.1 15.1 0.0 10.9 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 12.4 6.8 30.5 15.1 0.0 10.9 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.00 1.00 0.89 0.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1806 806 254 822 0 1217 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.58 0.37 0.88 0.66 0.00 0.63 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 1806 806 254 822 0 1217 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 10.3 8.9 23.5 11.0 0.0 16.6 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.5 0.3 27.1 2.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 4.1 2.0 5.0 4.8 0.0 4.4 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 10.8 9.2 50.6 13.0 0.0 19.1 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A B A D B A B A Approach Vol, veh/h 1351 769 769 A Approach Delay, s/veh 10.4 23.9 19.1 Approach LOS B C B Timer - Assigned Phs 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 35.0 25.0 35.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.5 20.5 30.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.4 12.9 32.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 7.9 2.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 16.3 HCM 6th LOS B Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 9: Grange & 50th 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 pm b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1233 89 8 814 196 203 Future Volume (veh/h) 1233 89 8 814 196 203 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1340 97 9 885 213 221 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 1943 140 94 1992 362 322 Arrive On Green 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 3454 243 8 3532 1781 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 707 730 476 418 213 221 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1827 1838 1617 1781 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.5 11.6 0.0 6.1 4.5 5.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.5 11.6 5.9 6.1 4.5 5.3 Prop In Lane 0.13 0.02 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1027 1056 1152 935 362 322 V/C Ratio(X) 0.69 0.69 0.41 0.45 0.59 0.69 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1404 1443 1520 1278 801 713 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.1 6.1 4.9 4.9 14.8 15.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.9 0.9 0.2 0.3 1.5 2.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.5 2.6 1.3 1.2 1.7 1.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 6.9 7.0 5.2 5.3 16.4 17.8 LnGrp LOS A A A A B B Approach Vol, veh/h 1437 894 434 Approach Delay, s/veh 6.9 5.2 17.1 Approach LOS A A B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.9 28.3 28.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 32.5 32.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.3 13.6 8.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.1 10.2 6.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.0 HCM 6th LOS A HCM 6th TWSC 7: City Hall/Dale & 50th 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 pm b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 1392 20 6 776 3 23 1 26 7 1 24 Future Vol, veh/h 25 1392 20 6 776 3 23 1 26 7 1 24 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - 50 - - - 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 27 1513 22 7 843 3 25 1 28 8 1 26 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 846 0 0 1535 0 0 2003 2427 757 1670 2448 423 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1567 1567 - 859 859 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 436 860 - 811 1589 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 787 - - 429 - - 35 32 350 63 31 579 Stage 1 - - - - - - 116 170 - 317 371 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 569 371 - 339 166 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 787 - - 429 - - 26 24 350 45 23 579 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 26 24 - 45 23 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 89 130 - 242 359 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 525 359 - 236 127 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.2 0.3 186.9 41.4 HCM LOS F E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 26 233 787 - - 429 - - 133 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.962 0.126 0.035 - - 0.015 - - 0.262 HCM Control Delay (s) $ 379.7 22.7 9.7 1.1 - 13.5 0.2 - 41.4 HCM Lane LOS F C A A - B A - E HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 3 0.4 0.1 - - 0 - - 1 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Eden & 50th 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 pm b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.3 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 1417 8 133 785 1 127 Future Vol, veh/h 1417 8 133 785 1 127 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 100 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1540 9 145 853 1 138 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1549 0 2262 775 Stage 1 - - - - 1545 - Stage 2 - - - - 717 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 424 - 35 341 Stage 1 - - - - 162 - Stage 2 - - - - 445 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 424 - 23 341 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 23 - Stage 1 - - - - 162 - Stage 2 - - - - 293 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.6 26 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 308 - - 424 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.452 - - 0.341 - HCM Control Delay (s) 26 - - 17.8 - HCM Lane LOS D - - C - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.2 - - 1.5 - HCM 6th TWSC 3: 50th & Sunnyslope 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 pm b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 1541 915 11 7 3 Future Vol, veh/h 2 1541 915 11 7 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 1675 995 12 8 3 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1007 0 - 0 1843 504 Stage 1 - - - - 1001 - Stage 2 - - - - 842 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - - 6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - - 3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 684 - - - 67 513 Stage 1 - - - - 316 - Stage 2 - - - - 383 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 684 - - - 64 513 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 64 - Stage 1 - - - - 303 - Stage 2 - - - - 383 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0 52.2 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 684 - - - 87 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - - 0.125 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.3 0.2 - - 52.2 HCM Lane LOS B A - - F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.4 HCM 6th TWSC 16: Arcadia & TH 100 ramp 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 pm b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.6 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 63 29 135 0 0 142 Future Vol, veh/h 63 29 135 0 0 142 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 68 32 147 0 0 154 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 301 147 0 - - - Stage 1 147 - - - - - Stage 2 154 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 691 900 - 0 0 - Stage 1 880 - - 0 0 - Stage 2 874 - - 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 691 900 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 691 - - - - - Stage 1 880 - - - - - Stage 2 874 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10.6 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 746 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.134 - HCM Control Delay (s) - 10.6 - HCM Lane LOS - B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.5 - HCM 6th TWSC 18: Grange & TH 100 ramp/City Hall 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 pm b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 20.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 299 0 220 0 0 23 162 77 26 0 87 10 Future Vol, veh/h 299 0 220 0 0 23 162 77 26 0 87 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - 0 - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 325 0 239 0 0 25 176 84 28 0 95 11 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 564 565 101 670 556 98 106 0 0 - - 0 Stage 1 101 101 - 450 450 - - - - - - - Stage 2 463 464 - 220 106 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 436 434 954 371 439 958 1485 - - 0 - - Stage 1 905 811 - 589 572 - - - - 0 - - Stage 2 579 564 - 782 807 - - - - 0 - - Platoon blocked, %- - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 383 379 954 251 383 958 1485 - - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 383 379 - 251 383 - - - - - - - Stage 1 790 811 - 514 499 - - - - - - - Stage 2 492 492 - 586 807 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 32.6 8.9 4.7 0 HCM LOS D A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1485 - - 383 954 958 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.119 - - 0.849 0.251 0.026 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 0 - 49.2 10 8.9 - - HCM Lane LOS A A - E B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - - 8 1 0.1 - - HCM 6th Roundabout 22: Normandale/Arcadia & Eden 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 pm b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.9 Intersection LOS A Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 508 311 192 335 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 518 317 196 341 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 279 171 561 339 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 401 586 236 149 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 9.5 5.7 7.6 7.5 Approach LOS A A A A Lane Left Left Left Left Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 518 317 196 341 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 1038 1159 779 977 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.980 0.982 0.981 0.981 Flow Entry, veh/h 508 311 192 335 Cap Entry, veh/h 1018 1138 764 958 V/C Ratio 0.499 0.274 0.252 0.349 Control Delay, s/veh 9.5 5.7 7.6 7.5 LOS A A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 3 1 1 2 HCM 6th AWSC 21: Willson/Grange & Eden 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 pm b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 21.6 Intersection LOS C Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 112 134 102 54 177 10 115 143 74 34 127 146 Future Vol, veh/h 112 134 102 54 177 10 115 143 74 34 127 146 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 122 146 111 59 192 11 125 155 80 37 138 159 Number of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 2 2 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 2 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 2 HCM Control Delay 17.2 22.2 32.2 14.6 HCM LOS C C D B Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2 Vol Left, % 35% 100% 0% 22% 21% 0% Vol Thru, % 43% 0% 57% 73% 79% 0% Vol Right, % 22% 0% 43% 4% 0% 100% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 332 112 236 241 161 146 LT Vol 115 112 0 54 34 0 Through Vol 143 0 134 177 127 0 RT Vol 74 0 102 10 0 146 Lane Flow Rate 361 122 257 262 175 159 Geometry Grp 6 7 7 6 7 7 Degree of Util (X) 0.771 0.282 0.536 0.59 0.389 0.316 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.691 8.348 7.521 8.108 7.998 7.167 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 473 432 482 445 450 501 Service Time 5.709 6.072 5.245 6.165 5.752 4.92 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.763 0.282 0.533 0.589 0.389 0.317 HCM Control Delay 32.2 14.3 18.6 22.2 15.8 13.2 HCM Lane LOS D B C C C B HCM 95th-tile Q 6.7 1.1 3.1 3.7 1.8 1.3 HCM 6th TWSC 28: access & Eden 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 pm b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 8.2 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 327 7 45 419 21 32 Future Vol, veh/h 327 7 45 419 21 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 16974 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 355 8 49 455 23 35 Major/Minor Minor2 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 553 455 0 0 Stage 1 553 - - - Stage 2 0 - - - Critical Hdwy 6.52 6.22 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.52 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 4.018 3.318 2.218 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 441 605 - - Stage 1 514 - - - Stage 2 - - - - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 0 605 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 0 - - - Stage 1 0 - - - Stage 2 0 - - - Approach EB WB HCM Control Delay, s 19.5 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBLn1 WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 605 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.6 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 19.5 - - HCM Lane LOS C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 4 - - HCM 6th TWSC 26: Willson & access 04/19/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-506\synchro\2024 pm b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 34 2 3 311 255 53 Future Vol, veh/h 34 2 3 311 255 53 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 37 2 3 338 277 58 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 650 306 335 0 - 0 Stage 1 306 - - - - - Stage 2 344 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 434 734 1224 - - - Stage 1 747 - - - - - Stage 2 718 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 433 734 1224 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 433 - - - - - Stage 1 745 - - - - - Stage 2 718 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 13.9 0.1 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1224 - 443 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - 0.088 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 0 13.9 - - HCM Lane LOS A A B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.3 - - 4917 Eden Avenue - Development Sustainability Questionnaire Over Date: 3/15/2021 RE: 4917 Eden Avenue – Preliminary Development Application Note: See the project sustainability goals/list below the questionnaire. Questions Answers Sustainable Design & Energy Have you utilized Xcel Energy’s Energy Design Assistance and/or Centerpoint Energy’s Builder and Developer programs for this development? Yes, Xcel Energy Assistance with the Willdan Team leading. Will the buildings meet SB2030 energy goals and/or will they be Energy Star certified? If not, please share the steps you are taking to support energy conservation. No, see below for the project sustainability features. Will affordable housing be a part of this development and if so, have you connected with Xcel Energy and Centerpoint Energy for the additional rebates they give to affordable housing? Yes, 20% of the units will be affordable. We intend to explore the additional rebates. Will you optimizing the roof by installing a green roof or solar ready? We are developing the project to be solar ready. Ownership is exploring the costs and rebates of the photovoltaic array installation during construction. Residents garden boxes are also located on the roof. Will there be any renewable energy generation on site? We are developing the project to be solar ready. Will there be purchase of renewable energy credits (RECs)? No Comments: See below for the project sustainability features. Managing Water What percent of the property is pervious surface before the redevelopment? What is the percent post development? 12.5% - Pre development 28.8% - Post development What new services will be pervious? (i.e. Sidewalks, driveways, overflow parking) These areas will not be permeable. The below grade parking garage is located below much of the site. The existing site is primarily paved, this project adds green space and landscaping. How will the landscaping support the natural ecosystem? What % of landscape, % Rain gardens, % native plants, % pollinator friendly plants? All of the plantings will be native and cultivars of native plantings to reduce the need for irrigation and fertilizers and provide habitat and food for pollinators. 4917 Eden Avenue - Development Sustainability Questionnaire Over Comments: See below for the project sustainability features. Managing Tree Canopy What percent of the property is covered by tree canopy before redevelopment? What is the percent post development? 12.46% - Pre development 32.40% - Post development Will you be replanting/replacing trees at least four to five inches in diameter to positively impact the tree canopy (ordinance requirement is only 2.5 inches in diameter)? We intend to meet the ordinance; the design adds a number of new trees to the site. Comments: Managing Waste During construction, how will you manage construction waste? Will demolition of current structures meet LEED Green Building Demolition and/or B3 State of Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines? Construction waste will be split into separate bins and recycled when possible. We do not intend to meet the listed guidelines, see below for the project sustainability features. Will you have a waste management plan when building is operational? Yes Will a recycling service be provided to those in residential units? To all businesses on site? Yes. Additionally, a recycling chute is provided in the building for the residents. Will an organic recycling service be provided to those in the residential units? To all businesses on site? Not intended at this time. Comments: Sustainable Transportation Bike Parking near main entrance for guests? Space in parking structure (e.g. bike corral, bike lockers) for residents’ bikes? Bike parking will be provided near the main entry and near the restaurant entry. Secure bike parking will be provided in the parking garage. How many EV charging stations will you install? Will you lay conduits for future EV charging and if so, how many stalls? 2 to be installed, 4 for future hook ups, we will work closely with our design/build electrical contractor to determine final counts. Will there be parking spaces provided for car-sharing vehicles to support reduction in overall number of cars? No 4917 Eden Avenue - Development Sustainability Questionnaire Over Comments: See below for the project sustainability features. 4917 Eden Avenue Sustainability Features 1. Solar ready - Roof top photovoltaic array for onsite energy production. 2. Roof top garden beds for residents. 3. New sidewalks and enhanced landscaping, improving and promoting the walking experience around the site. 4. Walk up units at Level 1. 5. Secure internal bike storage and bike repair for residents. 6. Exterior bike parking will be provided near the housing and restaurant entries. 7. Improved site storm water management through treatment and rate control, current site is uncontrolled. 8. We will plant native and cultivars of native plantings to reduce the need for irrigation and fertilizers and provide habitat and food for pollinators. 9. We will limit the extents of irrigated turf grass to reduce the need for irrigation and maintenance. 10. LED light fixtures to reduce energy consumption. 11. Energy Star appliances. 12. High efficiency water heaters. 13. Recycling collection and chute. 14. Durable exterior materials. 15. Efficient doors and windows, with Low-E coating. 16. Construction waste recycling. 17. Smoke free building. Stormwater Management Summary The existing Perkins site is mainly paved and sheet drains primarily to the southwest and discharges uncontrolled to the flared end section inlet to the Highway 100 storm sewer system, which drains directly to Minnehaha Creek. The proposed project stormwater from the roof, amenity plaza and east entry parking will be piped through the building to a underground stormwater system that also collects drainage from the west entry parking lot. The stormwater treatment system includes a pretreatment chamber and perforated CMP pipe gallery in a crushed rock bed, with a controlled outlet to the MnDOT storm sewer system. The system will provide rate control, treatment and volume control to meet the requirements of the City of Edina, MnDOT and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. GrandView District Development FrameworkEdina, MinnesotaDecember 7, 2011Revised January 17, 2012Revised January 25, 2012Revised January 31, 2012Revised March 27, 2012Revised April 5, 2012 24/05/12Ken Potts Kim Melin Randy Halvorson Chris Rofi dal Steve Buss Gene Persha Richard Borland Larry Chestler Laura Giertsen Ellen Jones Terry Ahlstrum Dick Ward Bill Neuendorf Tim McIlwain Bright Dornblaser Andy Brown Suzanne Davison Greg Domke Sandy Fox Dick Crockett Arne Cook Tom Bonneville Kim Montgomery Tim Murphy Th omas RaeuchleTom RuppertPeter Sussman Lisa Diehl Bob Kojetin David Davison Bernie Beaver Mike Platteter Peyton Robb Dan Gieseke Diane Reinhart James Justice Darcy Winter Paul Nelson David Novak Linda Urban Tom Mattison Ken and Adele Floren Michael Schroeder Jim SmithKevin Staunton, ChairMichael Fischer Brett Johnson Collin Bredeson Deron Lindquist Eric Bredesen Jim BaischSteering CommitteeConsultant TeamCuningham Group Architecture, PAClose Landscape ArchitectureHR GreenCommunity Design GroupSpringsted Inc.Table of ContentsExecutive Summary 31. Hope for Change 52. Thoughts and Interactions 63. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center 94. Moving Forward with a Purpose 455. Appendix 57 34/05/122. Completely rethink and reorganize the District’s transportation infrastructure to:• Make the District accessible and inviting to pedestrians and cyclists;• Create connections between the diff erent parts of the District;• Maintain automobile-friendly access to convenience retail; • Create separate pathways for “pass-through” and “destination” automobile traffi c; and• Preserve future transit opportunities provided by the rail corridor in a way that ensures that the kinds of opportunities pursued in the future are consistent with the character we envision for the District and provide benefi t to the surrounding neighborhood.3. Leverage public resources to make incremental value-creating changes that enhance the public realm and encourage voluntary private redevelopment consistent with the vision that improves the quality of the neighborhood for residents, businesses, and property owners. Th is Development Framework makes substantial progress in charting the path to be followed in redeveloping the GrandView District. By creating a vision that meets the seven Guiding Principles, it provides guidance to city offi cials, residents, business and property owners, and developers as opportunities for change emerge in the District. To ensure that the future redevelopment of the District is consistent with the vision articulated in this Framework, we recommend that it become part of the City’s Comprehensive Plan.Executive SummaryTh e Development Framework presented here is part of a small area planning process required by Edina’s Comprehensive Plan for those parts of our community (like the GrandView District) designated as Potential Areas of Change. It follows the 2010 GrandView District Small Area Guide Plan process. Th at process – led by a group of community residents and business and property owners – resulted in adoption by the Edina City Council of seven Guiding Principles for the redevelopment of the GrandView District.Th e process of crafting this Development Framework has been led by a 52-member Steering Committee made up of residents of the community and owners of area businesses and properties. Th e 52 members of the Steering Committee have dedicated countless hours since April of 2011 listening to community members, considering options, and debating alternatives for the future of the District. Th anks to a grant from the Metropolitan Council, we have had the good fortune to be supported in our eff orts by a talented group of consulting experts. We have also been fortunate to have the patient support of City staff throughout the process.Our objective in creating this Development Framework is to build upon the seven Guiding Principles adopted by the City Council. In the pages that follow, we share a vision of how to bring those Guiding Principles to life. While there are many details essential to fulfi lling that vision, our goals can be summarized as eff orts to:1. Create a place with a unique identity announced by signature elements like:• A central commons on the Public Works site with indoor and outdoor public space that connects the civic cornerstones of the District and serves the neighborhood and community needs;• A “gateway” at Highway 100 that announces the District as a special place, using elements like an iconic pedestrian and bicycle bridge spanning Highway 100; and• An innovative, cutting-edge approach to 21st-century sustainability. 44/05/12We want to be clear, however, that we recognize that the Framework (like the Comprehensive Plan) provides broad direction rather than detailed requirements. Th is Framework is intended to be a vision of the future rather than a blueprint. Achieving the vision will require, among other things:• A feasibility study that examines the costs and resources available to bear those costs;• An examination of the height and density necessary to make the vision fi nancially feasible while ensuring that it results in the human scale and neighborhood character that is the essential to the Framework;• Developing a strategy to allow for a vibrant business and residential community by managing the mix of retail, offi ce, residential, and public uses of land while maintaining the currently successful neighborhood service and convenience character;• A determination of a range of possible housing choices that support the character and experience of the District.• A community building/public green programming group should work to determine appropriate program and uses.We discuss these and other “next steps” in the Implementation section. Consistent with the “community-led” spirit of the initial stages of this process, we recommend that these “next steps” include active participation by community members, support of staff , and leadership from the City Council. Study Area Location 4/05/121. Hope for Change 64/05/121. Hope for ChangeIntroductionHope for Change has been the driving vision since the very beginning of this process that is now well into its second year of perspiration, participation, and planning. Th ousands of volunteer hours, countless meetings, and hundreds of discussions (large and small) have demonstrated that a committed group of citizen stakeholders, business leaders and owners, and elected and appointed offi cials believe that hope for change must be proactive, progressive, and promoted. Th e result will be not just be change for the sake of change, but directed energy, policy, and investment that will deliver a place for people to live, work, shop, and play in sustainable, memorable ways.Concept Diagram from the Small Area Guide Plan Process, December 2010 74/05/121. Hope for Change1. Leverage publicly-owned parcels and civic presence to create a vibrant and connected District that serves as a catalyst for high quality, integrated public and private development.2. Enhance the District’s economic viability as a neighborhood center with regional connections, recognizing that meeting the needs of both businesses and residents will make the District a good place to do business.3. Turn perceived barriers into opportunities. Consider layering development over supporting infrastructure and taking advantage of the natural topography of the area.4. Design for the present and the future by pursuing logical increments of change using key parcels as stepping stones to a more vibrant, walkable, functional, attractive, and life-fi lled place.5. Organize parking as an eff ective resource for the District by linking community parking to public and private destinations while also providing parking that is convenient for businesses and customers. 6. Improve movement within and access to the District for people of all ages by facilitating multiple modes of transportation, and preserve future transit opportunities provided by the rail corridor.7. Create an identity and unique sense of place that incorporates natural spaces into a high quality and sustainable development refl ecting Edina’s innovative development heritage.The Seven Guiding PrinciplesGuiding PrinciplesPrinciples Related to the Concept Diagram1. Leverage publicly owned parcels2. Meet the needs of businesses and residents3. Turn barriers into opportunities4. Pursue logical increments; make vibrant walkable and attractive5. Organize parking; provide convenience6. Improve movement for all ages; facilitate multiple modes of movement7. Identity and unique sense of place; be sustainable and innovative161226374457 84/05/121. Hope for ChangeHistoryBefore Edina became a village almost 125 years ago, a country market road crossed Minnehaha Creek at Edina Mills. Headed westward to the high ground, it branched out as Eden Prairie Road and Hopkins Road. In 1869, the Yancey family moved from Ohio and purchased 127 acres of land including that high ground and most of the present GrandView District. Civil War veteran Beverly C., his wife Ellen and their seven children were to become the most prominent pioneer black family of Edina over several decades and left a legacy of civic involvement. An observer described early Edina as an agricultural village, “where there is a post offi ce, a mill, and a store, and proudly aspires to the dignity of a trading town. Th e numerous farms are well-cultivated, and are occupied by intelligent people who appreciate education, and surround themselves with the accessories of a refi ned society.”A center of the early community was Minnehaha Grange No. 398, organized in 1873. Th e Grange Hall originated in a meeting at the Yancey family home in 1879 with a “considerable number of persons desirous to form an association to build and own a hall building near Edina Mills.” In 1888, the name Edina was voted upon in that building, which also served as the village hall until 1942. When moved for construction of St. Stephen’s Church in 1935, a member of the Yancey family donated the new site. In 1970, the Grange Hall was moved to the present Frank Tupa Park in the GrandView District, later joined by the historic Cahill School.Changes in the district have been ongoing including transportation and services. Members of the Yancey family platted Grand View Heights in 1910 and Tingdale Brother’s Brookside in 1916. In 1913, the Dan Patch Line was cut through the high ground east of Brookside Avenue, providing passenger service to Minneapolis from 1915 to 1942. In 1927, new highway 169/212 (current Vernon Avenue) was cut through the District. Grading and paving businesses such as J. A. Danens and Son located to serve the growth, joined by motels and restaurants. Th e District expanded rapidly with western Edina following World War II. Th e Edina directory of 1953 listed six of ten businesses in the District as including “Grandview” in their names: a cafe, market, two service station, hardware, and seed Sources: 1. R. J. Baldwin, in Isaac Atwater, History of Minneapolis and Hennepin County (Munsell, 1895), p. 1263 as quoted in Paul D. Hesterman, From Settlement to Suburb: Th e History of Edina, Minnesota (Burgess Publishing,1998) Edina Historical Society, p. 29.2. Meeting minutes dated March 7, 1879. Copy in the Edina Historical Society fi les.Historic GrandView Heights Platand garden supply store. In 1947, Jerry Paulsen opened a meat counter in one of the local groceries, a modest beginning to Jerry’s Enterprises, a longtime prominent presence in the District.It is encouraged to look to the history of the District in naming the proposed public amenities and new streets. Th e Yancey family in particular, due to their early ownership of the District and legacy of civic engagement, merits that honor at a prominent location such as the commons. 4/05/122. Thoughts and Interactions 104/05/122. Thoughts and InteractionsProject Schedule and ProcessSept Oct Nov DecPart IDiscussion and DiscoveryCommunity Workshop #1Part IIIdeas and OptionsCommunity Workshop #2Part IIIDecide and DeliverCommunity Workshop #3DeliverablesProject/Community Meetings Sept Oct Nov DecSteering CommitteeStaff CoordinationExecutive Team MeetingCommunity WorkshopWork Group MeetingsPlan Commission/CouncilProject Update#1 #2 #3Part I: Discussion and DiscoveryPart I is about learning from and listening to the Steering Committee, Work Groups, and other stakeholders; analyzing the study area and understanding the work done to-date; appreciating the larger dynamics of the area; and clearly defi ning the opportunities. An initial Community Workshop is held to conduct work group discussions/downloads, and a public meeting/presentation is hosted by the Steering Committee and the Consulting Team. Part II: Ideas and OptionsPart II focuses on developing ideas and options that address the specifi c issues raised by the Steering Committee, stakeholders, and the public process. The Consulting Team conducts a three-day Community Workshop (to be held in the study area) that will include Steering Committee meetings, focus group meetings, stakeholder interviews, team work sessions, and conclude with a public meeting/presentation.Part III: Decide and DeliverPart III consolidates all the comments, ideas, and options into a preferred direction. This part includes a third Community Workshop and public meeting. The Consulting Team prepares a summary document that may be widely distributed via a variety of sources (i.e., print, web, etc.) and a Sketch-up 3D model of the area with preferred options.Project Schedule: Th e project schedule was organized around three community workshops. 11Th e Steering Committee and Executive Committee have worked closely with the Consulting Team to facilitate a process that focused on key issues, opportunities, and recommendations. Th e process worked with the Steering Committee that met on a regular basis to guide the Consulting Team. A sub-committee of Work Groups addressed Land Use/Community Design, Community Needs/Public Realm, Transportation/Infrastructure and Real Estate/Finance. Th ese groups put an incredible amount of eff ort into initial background information and research, defi nition of issues, and discussion about ideas and options. A key component of the project was a series of Community Workshops held in September, October and November, 2011, that hosted a range of community stakeholders either in interviews, focus groups, program meetings and at public meetings.Th e community participation process included these primary groups of participants: Steering Committee, Executive Committee, work groups, City staff , focus groups (land owners, neighborhoods, public offi cials, schooldistrict, institutions, city departments, business operators, and others as identifi ed during the process), Plan Commission members, City Council members and the Mayor.4/05/122. Thoughts and InteractionsSummary of Participation ProcessThe Public Participation Process: Th e public participation process included Steering Committee meetings, work group meetings, public meetings, focus groups meetings, and program groups meetings throughout the fall of 2011. 4/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center 134/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterConcept DiagramsIntroduction Create “go to” and “stay at” uses Connect throughoutEasy to get to; easy to get aroundPrinciple #2 in the GrandView District Small Area Guide Plan is about “enhanc(ing) the District’s economic viability as a neighborhood center with regional connections.”Th e Guide Plan also suggests that “Th e District serves primarily as a neighborhood (rather than regional) center.” Based on Steering Committee and Public input, this idea has broad appeal. But what do we mean by neighborhood center and how does that fi t with specifi c expectations and outcomes for the GrandView District?“Neighborhood feel,” “pedestrian friendly,” and “safe and connected” describe the desired character for the District. But the basis for these words lies in a clear vision for the key elements, or systems, that defi ne place...and further set the framework for future and ongoing development at GrandView. Th ese elements include Land Use, Transportation and Movement, the Public Realm and Sustainability, and will be described and illustrated in more detail in this chapter.Neighborhood Center 144/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterHighway 100 and the rail corridor. Arcadia is seen as a more residential street with a range of condo, apartments, and multi-level townhouse types. Mixed-use and offi ce buildings are anticipated and may be oriented to Vernon and/or south toward Eden and the Our Lady of Grace (OLG) fi elds, a signifi cant open space that is a visual amenity to the greater district.Vernon is assumed to remain more convenience-and service-oriented with improved pedestrian sidewalks/connections, safer street crossings (especially to the adjacent neighborhood), bike lanes, and better organized/managed traffi c fl ow and parking. Both Eden and Vernon are anticipated to employ Complete/Living Street principles that emphasize the place-qualities of streets.Across Highway 100 to the east, the Vernon/50th/Eden alignment culminates with City Hall; long term uses are assumed to accommodate a greater civic/community presence when/if the Highway 100 interchange is reconfi gured as a split-diamond facility.Goals• Develop and improve the district as three smaller “villages” that are connected physically and by a signature character and identity.• Recognize the need for a range of housing types and choices and address those markets that also reinforce the District vision.Land UseLand use in the District is currently focused on convenience retail and service uses that are visible from Vernon Avenue. Th e majority of these uses are auto-oriented and are accessible from Vernon and Gus Young Lane. Th e exception is the GrandView Square development that includes residential, offi ce, and civic uses organized around a central green space. Th e Comprehensive Plan identifi es the GrandView Heights District as a mixed-use center character area, a potential “area of change” and guides future land as a mixed-use center. Th e Comprehensive Plan also says that “the District is in the process of evolving from a somewhat scattered auto-oriented district to a more integrated mixed of uses.”Th e over-arching concept is to support the “go-to” uses (auto-oriented) while anticipating more “stay-at” uses (pedestrian-oriented), and to improve future use and built form around three key civic “centers”: • City Hall• Library• Community Commons (civic building and green space)Th e future land use plan proposes a broader mix of uses arranged around a new central green space (GrandView Green) located on the public works site and fronting Arcadia. Th e plan emphasizes a mixed-use sub-area between Vernon/Eden/• Emphasize the connection to Minnehaha Creek.• Create a recognized, visible arts identity and provide space/place for greater community arts users and producers.• Address needs of underserved populations (teens, singles, seniors, etc.).• Establish a community commons as a multi-purpose facility for a wide audience (e.g., whole body, whole life, health and wellness) and as a focal point and central gathering place that connects City Hall to the east with the Library to the southwest. • Celebrate the “Birthplace” of Edina, the Mill, and record the oral history of GrandView Heights; tell the stories.• Emphasize a pedestrian-oriented sense of place that produces an appropriate scale and function, and preserves surrounding views. • Support economic growth and community stability by providing accessible and effi cient connections between home, school, work, recreation, and business destinations through improved pedestrian and vehicular environments throughout the area. 154/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand Use Land Use PlanVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100Public Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-use CenterOffi ceMedium/High Density Residential 164/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand Use Vernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100Illustrative Master PlanExisting BuildingsPotential DevelopmentProposed Civic Community Buildings 174/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand Use Potential Build-OutVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveLibraryHwy 100City Hall 184/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand Use Arcadia Avenue Looking North 194/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic Works SiteLand UseDevelopment3.6 acres Site28,000 SF Public Green24 units Condominium42 units Apartments50,000 SF Community/Civic16 units TownhousesParking200 spaces Park and Ride200 spaces Community Use158 spaces Multi-familyTh e public works site is located in a central point of the District and is seen as the “commons” for how the District vision will be realized. Uses proposed include the community green space located on top of a parking garage that supports area businesses, civic uses, and serves as a Metro Transit park and ride structure; a community/civic building anchoring the green; and a variety of residential uses including condominiums, apartments, and townhouse building types. Townhouse units are envisioned to front Arcadia as a building type that can incrementally “step-up” the hill, providing a character unique to the District.Public GreenCommunity CenterCondominiumsApartmentsTownhousesTownhousesArcadia AvePublic Works SitePublic GreenCommunity CenterCondominiumsApartmentsTownhousesEden AveArcadia AveEden AveA form-based code can guide desired building use and frontage. 203. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center4/05/12Land UsePublic Works Site Looking SoutheastGrandView CrossingArcadia AveEden AveHwy 100 214/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterProposed North-South SectionProposed East -West SectionLand UsePublic Works SiteGrandView Green Space on top of Parking StructureGrandView Green on top of Parking StructureNew frontage road on west side of Hwy 100ArcadiaOLGHwy 100Rail ROW Existing City RampJerry’sCommunity CenterCondominiumsTownhousesParkingEden AveGrandView Crossing 224/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterBus Garage SiteLand UseEden Ave5,000 SF Retail42,000 SF Offi ce175 spaces ParkingDue to the elevation change, this site lends itself to supporting a number of commercial and retail uses by adding a small, one level parking structure contiguous to and south of Jerry’s. Th is structure would work with the existing topography to allow better access to the Jerry’s loading area and to provide additional parking to support the grocery and needed parking at grade. Th is site could also accommodate a drive-thru use such as a small community bank, cleaners, or coff ee shop.ParkingRetailOffi ce/RetailOffi ceParkingEden AveJerry’s 233. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center4/05/12Bus Garage Site Looking NortheastLand UseEden AveJerry’s 244/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand UsePhase 1From a land use perspective, a number of immediate steps can be taken to set the stage for new investment in the District. Th ese include: • Policy changes to the Comprehensive Plan (the Small Area Plan is intended to update the Comprehensive Plan).• Potential zoning revisions that could include a form-based code to regulate desired public realm, building frontages, and building height.• Identifi cation of Eden and Vernon as early candidates for application of Living Streets principles.• Policy direction that guides overall sustainability of the District, including consolidated reuse/recycling, stormwater management, etc.• Policy direction that guides how new public and private investment may be supported with a variety of fi nancing tools.Th e public works site (public green space and a community/civic building) and the bus garage site are the two key parcels that can “jump-start” the redevelopment process. In particular, the ability of the public works site to provide a fee simple, unencumbered asset will allow civic/community and private and public realm uses to be realized early, and will demonstrate the leverage identifi ed in the Guiding Principles to support a variety of next steps. Th is could include a Metro Transit park and ride facility as a way to provide a parking structure that would also serve as the GrandView Commons (community/civic building/public green).In similar fashion, the bus garage can be a major pivot point for how a number of land use decisions may play out and will act as a land use “connector” along Eden. Th is site may need to be readied for development sooner than the public works site in order to accommodate a series of land use transitions that will help the larger District vision implementation. A third component of an early phase would be the development of the Wanner site currently owned by Our Lady of Grace as potential residential, offi ce, or retail uses.In support of these anticipated land use changes, new street confi gurations/alignments, circulation patterns, and streetscape/pedestrian improvements along Eden will complete a bike and pedestrian network and support the anticipated land use changes with improved automobile circulation and management.12637451. Public Works2. School Bus Garage3. New Bridge/Street4. Wanner Site5. Jerry’s Site6. Jerry’s Site7. City Ramp Access 254/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand UsePhase 1Hwy 100Eden AveArcadia AvePhase 1 DiagramA. Public Works Site• Community Commons: GrandView Crossing (street) GrandView Green Community/Civic building• Arcadia steps• Community/Civic building• Variety of residential building types• Structured parking• Park and ride structureB. Bus Garage Site• Multi-level parking• Retail/service/offi ce useACBEDVernon AveCommunity Green Space on top of Parking StructureHousingWanner/OLG PropertyTh e following chapter on Implementation is included as one example of anticipating an initial, or Phase 1, increment and associated preliminary range of costs. Th ese numbers are not detailed costs but represent one possible range of expenditures that are included here to illustrate levels of funding (and investment) of various components. Th e Phase 1 diagram and following spreadsheets for the public works site, the bus garage site, and local street improvements will vary depending on actual funding sources, timing, program, and other factors (e.g., cost of materials and labor) that cannot be determined at this time. See Appendix.C. Wanner Site• Townhouses fronting OLG open spaceD. Eden Avenue Streetscape• Bus stop integrated• Boulevard organizes intersection alignmentsE. Jerry’s Streetscape• Pedestrian enhancements• Streetscape• Stormwater treatment 264/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmPublic realm refers to all land and area under the ownership of the city. Th is includes city streets and rights-of-way (ROW), parks and open space, and parcels of land or other assets that are used to provide individual and collective benefi t and amenity to all residents and the general public. Th e greater value and power of the public realm is its ability to connect neighborhoods, businesses, schools, and parks and open space into a larger whole greater than the sum of the individual elements. Streets and ROW make up a major (and connected) portion of the public realm and represent a signifi cant opportunity to enhance and connect the community. It is critical to view streets, then, not as just conveyors for automobiles but also as multi-modal facilities that provide democratic accessibility for all and as form-givers and green space that increase the livability of the community. Th e result should be a greater sense of green throughout the District.Goals• Acknowledge “no net loss,” yet aggressively seek new public space.• Improve the bike and pedestrian environment: make it safe and friendly, and include adequate parking area for bikes.• Create a community/civic building connected to GrandView Green (an outdoor public green space) that connects east and west and serves as an indoor/outdoor gathering space.• Create a prominent public realm of connected parks, green space, paths, plazas, and private open space – a legible green framework as the primary form giver.• Provide views within the District and maintain important viewsheds (such as the “grand view”) for public use.• Plan for a safe, comfortable pedestrian environment that links public and private destinations north-south (neighborhoods, library, businesses) and east-west (neighborhoods, businesses, commons, City Hall).Images (top to bottom): Osaka, Japan; Montreal, Canada; and New York, New York. 274/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmA. GrandView CommonsB. GrandView StepsC. GrandView CrossingD. Arcadia StreetscapeE. Gus Young StreetscapeF. Arcade ConnectionG. Vernon StreetscapeH. Eden StreetscapeABCDFHHGEVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100HankersonSummitSunnyslopeW Frontage RdSherwoodBrooksideDale DrE. Frontage Rd52nd St51st StPublic Realm / Open Space Diagram 284/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmGrandView Commons For GrandView, the public works site provides a unique and singular opportunity to create a major new public realm amenity that will add interest to the area for all stakeholders, value to real estate, and provide a signature gathering place in the heart of the District. Beyond that, an even greater opportunity exists then to continuously link the businesses and destinations within the District to the surrounding neighborhoods and the city in general. Th is can begin immediately by simply investing in a safe and connected public sidewalk network, increment by increment. Th e larger vision of the public realm includes a community/civic building and GrandView Green, a connected network of public parks, public and private plazas, a new street (GrandView Crossing), sidewalk and streetscape improvements, and bike and pedestrian facilities. Th is should include bridge enhancements on Eden over Highway 100, a pedestrian and bike bridge connecting the Commons with City Hall, and the potential to connect Eden and Brookside with local a bike path within the Canada Pacifi c Rail ROW.Montreal public green: Th is public green suggests the appropriate scale and character of GrandView Green. 294/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmGrandView Commons: GrandView Commons includes GrandView Crossing, GrandView Green, and a new community/civic building.Social InteractionExercise and FitnessClassroomTeen ActivityBanquet and ReceptionHistory / InterpretivePerforming and Visual ArtsMeetingsFood Prep / Community Oven Retail / IncubatorGrandView Crossing Pedestrian BridgeGrandView GreenCivic BuildingArcadia AveHwy 100GrandView Community Commons DiagramWhat / Who Populates the Commons? 304/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmVernon , Eden, Sherwood, LibraryEden AveEden AveLibraryTh e plan here is to focus on improving pedestrian connections between the Library/Senior Center and Jerry’s, via a more street-like character that extends north from GrandView Square Street, including a well-defi ned pedestrian crossing at Eden. Sherwood is shown as a conversion for additional parking and may still allow movement through the area, though at a very reduced rate of speed. Th is conversion allows a small green space to connect the Library to Vernon.1. Conversion of Eden Avenue would provide 50 additional parking spaces.2. A small green space connects the Library to Vernon giving the civic building an “address” on Vernon.3. Pedestrian crossings are created or enhanced to provide safe and visible locations (51st, 52nd, and 53rd Streets) on Vernon and to the west of the bus garage site on Link to cross the street.4. Th e GrandView Square area is connected to Jerry’s and beyond through the use of a streetscape that provides a well-defi ned pedestrian system as well as a more organized parking and circulation pattern.5. Any additional street and block improvements (including curb cuts and /or traffi c signals) should be considered after improvements have been made to Vernon and appropriate traffi c and parking studies have been completed (also refer to potential alternatives in the appendix)1123334Vernon AveGrandView SquareSherwoodBrookside52nd St53rd St5Link 314/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmEden AveLibraryGrandView SquareVernon AveLibrary Site Looking East 324/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterArcadia AveVernon AveGus Young LnJerry’sGrandView CrossingPublic RealmVernon, Gus Young, Interlachen Interl ac h e n Th e plan recommends a number of street and traffi c improvements that will provide greater predictability for the management of traffi c, thereby creating a safer environment for bikes and pedestrians. Th is is made possible by building a new street (GrandView Crossing) and bridge (over the CP Rail corridor) that will connect Vernon east to Arcadia and then paired with Gus Young to create a one-way street pattern. Anchoring the public realm is the GrandView Green, an approximately one-half + acre public space located on the north end of the public works site.1. New street and bridge connection (GrandView Crossing).2. GrandView Green public space and outdoor gathering area.3. Gus Young (westbound)and GrandView Crossing (eastbound) are combined to create a one-way street pair.4. Left turns from southbound Vernon to Gus Young are removed.5. Improved pedestrian crossings on Vernon.6. Complete Streets principles application would transfer Vernon into a 3-lane section with bike lanes and pedestrian improvements.7. Pedestrian plaza/bridgehead and future bike/pedestrian bridge connection over Highway 100.8. Public steps of Arcadia.1233455678SummitCommunity / Civic BuildingCity Parking Ramp 334/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterCity HallPublic RealmVernon AveEden AveCity HallHwy 100Sunnyslope RdDale DrWith the future addition of the split-diamond interchange for Highway 100, the east side could see some signifi cant changes with the public realm, land use, and improved pedestrian/bike environments.1. Frontage road associated with the split-diamond interchange.2. Excess land from Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) could be used for underground parking (with a green roof deck) and future community/civic use.3. Strategy would provide an improved/expanded Frank Tupa Park and setting for the historic Cahill School and Grange Hall.4. Grange Road alignment is “rationalized” to provide a more effi cient parking layout and allow for a small civic green (5) in front of City Hall.5. Pedestrian/bike bridge connects to west side of Highway 100.6. Eden is shown as a “parking” street to provide additional supply for City Hall.2456314 344/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationTh e GrandView area street and movement network is primarily composed of Vernon/50th Street (reliever/augmenter arterial), Eden (local street, state-aid facility) and the multiple ingress/egress ramp system of Highway 100 (designated a principal arterial). Th ere are other local streets, but most provide limited service (such as Summit Avenue) or access that dead ends (such as Brookside off Eden). Th e highway interchange has several on and off ramps that, according to MnDOT, are redundant and/or unsafe. Vernon is a county facility that, south of Interlachen, has seen a reduction of average daily traffi c over the past 10 years. Eden provides a secondary connection within the District east and west over Highway 100. Eden is designated the primary bike route through the District; Vernon and Interlachen are designated as secondary routes.Th ere are two major recommendations that support the overall movement and transportation goals of the plan. First, the Framework proposes that the Highway 100 interchange be reconfi gured into a split-diamond interchange to better manage through-traffi c and to provide improved local access/circulation via frontage roads east and west of the highway. Over time, this would provide a more connected local system (i.e., more local streets) with direct access to Highway 100 via the frontage roads. Second, the Framework proposes a new east-west street along the north half of the public works site (spanning the CP Rail corridor) connecting to Arcadia from Vernon, that would be paired with Gus Young Lane to provide a one-way circulation pattern. It would operate as one-way in (eastbound) from Vernon on the new GrandView Crossing, and one-way out (westbound) to Vernon/Interlachen on Gus Young Lane. Th is pattern would eliminate the left hand turn from Vernon (southbound) to Gus Young Lane.Bike improvements would focus on more lane area and identifi cation along Vernon and Eden, consistent with Living and Complete Streets principles. Over the long term, east-west bike and pedestrian access would be improved by adding a new bridge over Highway 100 that would connect the GrandView Commons to Tupa Park, City Hall, and the Minnehaha Creek mill area. In addition to more bike parking facilities in the District, the plan recommends an off -road option within the District: an at-grade bike path alongside the CP Rail ROW from Eden connecting to Brookside.Functional Class • Highway 100: Principal Arterial.• 50th Street: A Minor Augmenter.• Vernon Avenue: B Minor Connector.• Interlachen Boulevard: Major Collector.• Eden Avenue: Local Street.Traffi c Volume• 13,000-23,000 AADT along West 50th Street/Vernon Avenue.• 4000-8000 AADT along Eden Avenue.Goals • Support a more effi cient, compact, and safe interchange access to Highway 100 from Vernon and Eden.• Create a more bike and pedestrian friendly environment by applying Complete Streets and Living Streets principles to Vernon, Eden, and the local street network.• Create an improved circulation and access network between public streets/parcels and private development/destinations.• Create an enhanced parking environment that, in part, depends on shared, centrally-located District parking supplies.• Partner with Metro Transit to implement a community-scale Park and Ride and bus turnaround loop in the area.• Complete the historical transition of Vernon from old Highway 169 to a local District street.• Identify and implement a demonstration project for “Complete/Living” streets principles.• Provide additional auto, bike, and pedestrian connections east and west in the District.• Maintain and improve parking, access, and circulation in the short term for convenience, retail, and service uses.• Complete the pedestrian and bike system. Make bikes and pedestrians a priority and allow for a safe crossing over Highway 100.• Take a leadership role related to the Highway 100 interchange. Build the “reason platform” for multi-modal access and gateways.• Preserve the CP Rail corridor for future, possible public transit, and non-motorized movement/connection in the District.• Reduce congestion by providing safe travel choices that encourage non-motorized transportation options, increasing the overall capacity of the transportation network. 354/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterComplete/Living Streets improvementsPrivate streetscapesSplit diamond interchangeNew / improved bridgesTransportationVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100District Street FrameworkTh e movement framework for the District begins with addressing policy issues like the adoption of the Living Streets principles and applying Hennepin County’s Complete Streets policy, as well as considering larger and more long term ideas like reconstructing the Highway 100 interchange using a “split diamond” confi guration. Th is approach accomplishes a number of objectives that meet the District Principles and provides an incremental approach to addressing change over time. Th e existing slip ramp location off the southbound ingress ramp would be retained but would be combined with an additional connection to Gus Young as part of the one way frontage road system. Traffi c would be controlled at four signalized intersections. In the short term, there is an opportunity to begin implementing streetscape, bike, and pedestrian improvements. Another important recommendation is to implement the GrandView Crossing/Gus Young one-way street pair that will help manage traffi c access and circulation in the upper core of the District. 364/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationDistrict Street FrameworkExistingProposed 374/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportation Highway 100 and West Frontage Road Looking WestVernon AveEden AveHwy 100 384/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationParking• Consider the use of the current city parking ramp (located behind Jerry’s) to accommodate future park and ride patrons and general parking district supply; increase the capacity of this structure in the future if economically possible/practical.• Th e public works site should be considered as a location for a Metro Transit park and ride facility as a way to provide parking to weekly commuters and to provide parking for a community/civic building, public green, residences and other uses. In addition, the top level (deck) of this structure is intended to serve as the GrandView Green, the major public realm amenity in the district.• Additional parking (structure) is proposed to the south and contiguous to Jerry’s grocery store to provide better service access to the loading area and provide additional parking supply.Parking beneath buildingsNew access to existingSurface lotsExisting rampDirection of traffi cVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100PP 394/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationPark and Ride OptionsABCLocation Spaces NotesA Use existing ramp 244 Access issuesC New ramp in “cloverleaf” n/a Long termB New ramp on public works site 200 Fee simple587 Express RouteExisting bus stopsVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100Metro Transit operates the #587 Express route through the GrandView District before turning north on Highway 100 to downtown. Th ey have a well documented market that they serve in southwest Edina, and board riders on a daily basis who are parking in front of the library, in the city ramp, and in front of a number of businesses. Th ey are highly motivated to locate a “community” scale park and ride facility that would accommodate no more than 200 cars. At least two sites have the potential to serve this need: the existing city ramp and a potential structure on the public works site. Th e existing city ramp is currently undergoing a construction project (new water treatment plant on the ground fl oor) and according to the city, this would make adding additional levels problematic. Access will also be an issue as well when the new GrandView Crossing is built. Th e city does think additional parking could be located over Brookside behind and east of Jerry’s.Under the right conditions and with some minor improvements, the public works site could be converted into a park and ride lot tomorrow. Th is would be an interim solution (a similar scenario involving the site as an interim use for the Edina bus garage could also be considered). Th e advantage of locating a park and ride on the public works site is that it is a fee simple site that could be used with little change to existing conditions. In general, a park and ride could provide a surplus of parking during nights and weekends, and serve overfl ow parking in the District as well. 404/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationVernon Avenue Right-SizingSouth of the Interlachen intersection, Vernon Avenue would be reconfi gured into a three lane, divided section that would better accommodate local traffi c movement, provide a dedicated bike lane, and capture some of the ROW for pedestrian improvements and street crossings.sidewalk8’sidewalk8’boulevard6’boulevard6’bike lane6’bike lane6’drive lane12’medianvariesdrive lane12’Proposed Section for Vernon AvenueExisting Section for Vernon Avenuedrive lane drive lane12’ 12’drive lane drive lane12’ 12’Vernon Avenue Looking South: A new three lane section would allow additional space for bikes and pedestrians, and provide controlled left turn lanes. 414/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterHighway 100 ImprovementsTransportationShort Term Improvements Long Term ImprovementsNew rampsEliminated rampsSignalA major proposal involves the short term and long term confi guration of the Highway 100 interchange. Th e plan proposes a “split-diamond” arrangement that would manage access on and off the highway at signalized intersections. Th ese intersections would be at Vernon and Eden, and would connect with parallel, one-way frontage roads. Th is confi guration would allow regional traffi c to clearly and safely access the highway and still move into the District with predictability and safety. Long term prospects might include the transfer of unused MnDOT ROW for local and community uses such as civic building sites, future bus rapid transit support, parking, and open space. 424/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterBicycle ImprovementsTransportationPrimary bike routesSecondary bike routesTrail (on CP ROW)Vernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100Bike lanes are shown for Vernon, a secondary bike route, and Eden, a primary bike route, through the District. Th e lanes are shown with enhanced paint and striping as well as additional lane area. A potential bike facility using the CP Rail right-of-way or adjacent land could connect Eden, at grade, to Brookside, thereby providing an off -road option to move through the District. 434/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationBicycle ImprovementsEden AvenueVernon between Eden and Interlachen Vernon south of EdenExistingExisting ExistingProposedProposed ProposedPrecedentPrecedent 444/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterSustainabilityOne dictionary defi nes sustainability as:• Th e ability to be sustained, supported, upheld, or confi rmed. • Th e quality of not being harmful to the environment or depleting natural resources, and thereby supporting long term ecological balance.For GrandView, sustainability is about how the natural and manmade environments coexist in a way that limits and/or prohibits harmful impact on the environment now and for generations to come. But it also has meaning for how the community and businesses will be sustained, supported, and upheld. One is not isolated or independent from the other; a comprehensive, long term defi nition of sustainability should guide how the District and the community move forward with goals, recommendations, and actions.Recent Activities Sustainability is a broad and deep subject that is constantly being refi ned from principles and policies to products and practices to fi nancing and implementation—perhaps so much so that it may seem diffi cult to determine where to begin and what next steps should be taken. For GrandView, it seems practical to review some of the recent decisions and actions the city has taken that will provide a foundation for how the District will grow, change, and redevelop.• Edina Energy & Environment Commission: Solar/wind ordinance amendments task force. City staff is reviewing proposed ordinance. • PACE Financing: Th e Edina City Council unanimously adopted the Edina Emerald Energy Program November 15, 2011, making it the fi rst Minnesota city to take advantage of Property-Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) legislation. PACE, which was approved by the state Legislature in 2010, allows property owners to have the cost of energy effi ciency and conservation improvements assessed to their property and paid alongside property taxes. GrandView Tire & Auto, 5415 70th Street West, used the tool for the necessary fi nancing to install a 27-kilowatt solar panel system on the already green auto shop’s roof.• New Public Works Facility: Th e public works building was built with sustainability in mind. It has geothermal heating and cooling and used recycled materials, and its landscape was designed to minimize the development’s impact on the environment. A rain garden at the corner of 74th and Metro Boulevard holds and infi ltrates water from sloping parking lots with curb cuts to direct the water to native grasses and plants.• City Hall: Installation of solar panel project in Fall of 2011.• City Council Living Streets policy: Recommendation of the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) to establish a comprehensive Living Streets Policy that integrated all modes of transportation and addressed issues such as traffi c calming, stormwater management, promoting active living, community feel, improving walking and biking, and enhancing urban forests. If approved by the Council, the ETC would work in collaboration with staff to prepare the policy for the Council’s future consideration. Mr. Sullivan reported a $15,000 grant was available to initiate the creation of this policy, which may cost $60,000-$100,000 to complete. • Adoption of MinesotaGreenStep Cities program, 2011: On January 18, 2011, Edina passed a council resolution to become a member of the Minnesota GreenStep Cities program. Minnesota GreenStep Cities is a voluntary challenge, assistance, and recognition program to help cities achieve their sustainability goals through implementation of 28 best practices. Each best practice can be implemented by completing one or more specifi c actions from a list of four to eight actions. Th ese actions are tailored to all Minnesota cities, focus on cost savings and energy use reduction, and encourage innovation. 454/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterSustainabilityGreenstep’s 28 Best PracticesBuildings and Lighting1. Effi cient Existing Public Buildings: Work with utilities and others to assess and fi nance energy and sustainability improvements of existing structures.2. Effi cient Existing Private Buildings: Work with utilities and others to assess and fi nance energy and sustainability improvements of existing structures.3. New Green Buildings: Construct new buildings to meet or qualify for a green building standard.4. Effi cient Building & Street Lighting and Signals: Improve the effi ciency of public and private lighting and signals.5. Building Reuse: Create economic and regulatory incentives for redeveloping and repurposing existing buildings before building new.Land Use6. Comprehensive Plan and Implementation: Adopt a Comprehensive Plan and tie regulatory ordinances to it.7. Effi cient City Growth: Promote fi nancial and environmental sustainability by enabling and encouraging higher density housing and commercial land use.8. Mixed Uses: Develop effi cient and healthy land patterns.9. Effi cient Highway-Oriented Development:Adopt commercial development and design standards for highway road corridors.10. Conservation Design: Adopt development ordinances or processes that protect natural systems.Transportation11. Complete Green Streets: Create a network of multi-modal green streets.12. Mobility Options: Promote active living and alternatives to single-occupancy car travel.13. Effi cient City Fleets: Implement a city fl eet investment, operations, and maintenance plan.14. Demand-Side Travel Planning: Implement Travel Demand Management and Transit-Oriented Design.Environmental Management15. Purchasing: Adopt environmentally preferable purchasing policies and practices.16. Urban Forests: Increase city tree and plant cover.17. Ecologic Stormwater Management: Minimize the volume of and pollutants in rainwater runoff .18. Parks and Trails: Enhance the city’s green infrastructure.19. Surface Water Quality: Improve local water bodies.20. Effi cient Water and Wastewater Facilities: Assess and improve drinking water and wastewater facilities.21. Septic Systems: Implement an eff ective management program for decentralized wastewater treatment systems.22. Solid Waste Reduction: Increase waste reduction, reuse and recycling.23. Local Air Quality: Prevent generation of local air contaminants.Economic and Community Development24. Benchmarks & Community Engagement: Adopt outcome measures for GreenStep and other city sustainability eff orts, and engage community members in ongoing education, dialogue, and campaigns.25. Green Business Development: Document the use of assistance programs for green business and job development.26. Renewable Energy: Remove barriers to and encourage installation of renewable energy generation capacity.27. Local Food: Strengthen local food and fi ber production and access.28. Business Synergies: Network/cluster businesses to achieve better energy, economic, and environmental outcomes. 464/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterSustainability Goals• Take a position on sustainability; be a model for city wide sustainability.• Defi ne incentives to attract “Best-in-Class” development that deliver highest levels of sustainable design.• Take advantage of “free” resources: wind, rain, and sun.• Reduce heat island eff ect and create a pedestrian environment that is pleasant, shaded, and visually interesting.• Address stormwater runoff in all phases and facets of the District.• Build on existing infrastructure.• Take advantage of available partnerships/funding.• Create District (not separate site) solutions.• Apply GreenStep Best Practices.RecommendationsA number of recommendations should be considered for the District and emerge from what is being done by the City Council, Energy & Environment Commission, Transportation Commission, Planning Commission, other boards/commissions, and various stakeholders. Th e GreenStep Cities best practices are an obvious start to how these apply to the District. Beyond that, it will be important to defi ne the District in an organizational manner so that roles and responsibilities can be defi ned and actions coordinated. A good example would be how a District committee on sustainability could begin to defi ne the “GrandView Works”—a sustainable practices approach for how water, waste, and energy are addressed from a District point of view.For GrandView, there are three levels of approach and opportunity that build from what is being done today in the District (in some cases by individual businesses or owners) and lay the groundwork for a sustainable strategy:1. Work from existing strengths and build the foundation• Respond to existing plans, policies, and best practices already in place (local, county, and regional policies).• Educate District stakeholders about best practices, case studies, etc.• Establish a general communications structure and forum for what is being done.• Consider new policy to focus on redevelopment areas like GrandView with sustainability guidelines.• Stormwater management policy at the District level (works with both watersheds).• Pilot project(s) for solar light installation (pedestrian and parking areas).2. District Systems• Stormwater strategy under parking collection/storage/treatment/reuse.• Recycle/reuse building materials (after demolition).• Grey water use.• Trash collection and recycling within the District beyond what is currently required by the city.• Consolidated organic recycling focused on restaurants in the area.• Generate alternative power for specifi c uses/needs.• Green and white roofs.3. Closed Loops• Recycled stormwater into drinking water supply.• Recycled grey water into drinking water supply.• Off -the-grid.• Green buildings—zero carbon. 474/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterSustainability 4/05/124. Moving Forward with a Purpose 494/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation Strategy1. Adopt the framework as a part of the Comprehensive Plan.As a policy document, the Comprehensive Plan off ers the ability to guide future development in the GrandView District even in the absence of more defi nitive plans. Once adopted, the framework provides signifi cant context for determining further directions and actions in the GrandView District.2. Establish an Implementation Steering Committee using citizen volunteers to guide the eff ort, including providing direction for key remaining areas of the framework, with working groups as needed to support the work of the Implementation Steering Committee.An over-riding objective of the GrandView District planning process is to utilize local citizens as experts in defi ning directions for an area identifi ed in the Comprehensive Plan as a location where the potential for change exists. With signifi cant investment of time, talent, and energy, in addition to the local knowledge that has been developed through the Small Area Guide process and the Small Area Plan process, it is logical that the process of planning using local citizens to guide the process should continue. Th e process to be pursued should, as in past eff orts leading to the framework, be defi ned by the citizen volunteers.5. Set a plan for the evolution of the District.Th e planning process was established with the understanding that the GrandView District would redevelop incrementally in concert with a vision defi ned by the community. A key aspect of the plan, and one that can be best defi ned once several of the decision points in Step 4 (above) have been advanced, is to determine a logical, sustainable, and reasonably defi nitive plan for its evolution.6. Provide regular updates to the City Council.A Steering Committee charged with guiding the further development of a plan for the GrandView District cannot act independently of other actions of the city, just as the area itself cannot evolve independent of the rest of the Edina community. With regular updates, the evolving plan can be assured that it aligns with other policies of the city.3. Evaluate the GrandView District small area planning process as a means of engaging citizens in local planning.As indicated in the Comprehensive Plan, several areas of potential change remain in the community. An objective review of the GrandView process will allow the city to determine whether it should be replicated, modifi ed, or abandoned as a local planning tool. 4. Initiate a process led by the Implementation Steering Committee to provide direction for key remaining areas of the framework.Remaining key decision points, many of which are interrelated but all of which must be defi ned in terms of the approved framework, include:• Transportation elements• Density and height• Housing aff ordability• Financing• Design and development guidelines• Community Building 504/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation1-5 years5-10 years10+ yearsVernon AveEden AveHwy 100Generalized Phasing PlanA generalized phasing plan is shown that organizes phasing into three simplifi ed increments with the understanding that a variety of conditions will infl uence actual investment and implementation.1. Policy and RegulationTh is Framework recommends (consistent with the Comprehensive Plan) that the District evolve from a Community Commercial Node (pg. 4-31 Comprehensive Plan) into a mixed-use center. However, the Plan also suggests a vision that may not be completely consistent with current zoning including how use, built form, and parking may be regulated. Concurrent with other implementation activities, zoning revisions, including the potential use of a form-based code and design guidelines will be addressed by the Implementation Steering Committee after approval of the Framework by the City Council. 2. Phasing, Development & FinanceTh e following graphic begins the discussion about how to best arrange and prioritize the public land parcels (public works site and school bus garage site) so that new investment and redevelopment can occur in a timely manner and in response to market and community forces. Central in this discussion is the school bus garage site which, when a new garage site can be found, can include new commercial/offi ce uses, replacement of existing uses, expansion of businesses in the district currently in need of more space (such as the municipal liquor store), and parking. Th is could help set the stage for how next steps could be accomplished including initial investment on the public works site, parking and circulation enhancements/additions, and Eden Avenue improvements. In addition, a community building / public green programming group should work during this phase to determine appropriate program and uses. 514/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation Immediate < 1 year1 Development Framework approval2 Policy for implementation/fi nance3 Create Implementation Committee4. Implementation Committee should address programming of community / civic building5 Create sustainability guide from GreenStep6 TIF District7A Design Guidelines7 Form-based code for mixed use center8 Green building standards required for district9 Prepare Phase 1 Master Plan10 Address Lifecycle and aff ordable housing1-5 YearsLand Use11 Bus Garage site redevelopment12 Townhouse units on public works site13 Residential on Warner site/OLG14 Community / Civic buildingPublic Realm15 GrandView Green over parking structure16 Arcadia Steps/and streetscape17 CP Rail bike path from Eden to Brookside18 Add tree lined streetscape and monument signs into Richmond Hills neighborhoodTransportation/Infrastructure19 Park n ride structure/green roof@public works site20 Additional parking south of Jerry’s21 GrandView Crossing bridge & street22 Eden Living Streets/streetscape /3 lane section23 Eden Living Streets/Arcadia/Normandale24 New access from Eden to city ramp parking25 Jerry’s parking Streetscape26 Implement one-way pairs/remove left to G. Young27 Reservation on public works site for rail transit use Sustainability28 GrandView Works/Organics recycling center 29 Stormwater reuse & management policy30 Solar pilot project for public lightingMajor Recommendations 524/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation5-10 YearsLand Use31 Arcadia site redevelopment/include pocket park32 Apt/condo units on public works site33 Residential on Warner site/OLG/Phase 2Public Realm34 Small civic green at City Hall35 Arcadia streetscape improvementsTransportation/Infrastructure36 Vernon Living Streets/streetscape/3 lane section37 Dedicate right turn from Vernon to Interlachen38 Reconfi gure Eden as parking street@City Hall39 Eden bridge pedestrian/bike enhancements40 Vernon as primary bike route to GrandView Crossing41 Consider ‘turn-back’ of Vernon from County42 Complete Streets: Library green space fronting Vernon 43 Reconfi gure Eden as parking streetSustainability44 Stormwater collection/treatment system45 Grey water reuse/irrigation, etc.46 GrandView Works/geothermal at OLG fi elds10+ YearsLand Use47 East frontage road site redevelopment48 Civic development on excess MNDOT landPublic Realm49 Hwy 100 pedestrian/bike bridge50 Green roof/space over underground parking51 Add green space to Tupa Park52 Include gateway walls/landscape w/interchangeTransportation/Infrastructure53 Hwy 110 split diamond interchange54 Realignment of Grange Rd/Eden55 Add Gus Young extension to frontage roadSustainability56 Closed loop water supply system57 GrandView Works/Alternative energy sourcesMajor Recommendations 534/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation1DC - Downtown Core StandardsSide(2) Siting(3) Heightat the front of the lot: a minimum of 75% of build-ing facade shall be placed within 5 feet of the front lot line. This requirement applies to the building’s fi rst two storeys and to all parts of the lot that abut a street or sidewalk 5’see Height Overlay District for minimum and maximum heights and upper storey stepbacksat the rear of the lot: 10’ setback required for load-ing areas, none if adjacent to street or alley.parking setback line30’at the side of the lot: none required. One side of build-inmg must be placed at the side lot line. Also refer to Neighborhood Compatibility requirements 10’commerceresidentialfi nished fl oor height: avg 3 feet above sidewalkfi nished fl oor height: maximum 18 inches above sidewalkA. Building Height i. Th e buildings shall be at least 2 storeys in height but no greater than the heights as designated on map____. Upper storey step backs are also designated on map____.B. Ground Storey Height: Commerce Uses i. Th e average ground storey fl oor elevation within 30 feet of the front property line shall be 1.Not lower than the front sidewalk elevation. 2.Not higher than 18 inches above the sidewalk. ii. Th e ground storey shall have at least 15 feet of clear interior height contiguous to the front property line for a minimum depth of 25 feet. iii. Th e maximum ground storey height is 22 feet, measured from the sidewalk to the second storey fl oor. C. Ground Storey Height (residential uses) i. Th e average fi nished fl oor elevation shall be no less than 3 feet above the sidewalk at the front property line ii. Th e ground storey shall have an interior clear height of at least 9 feet and a maximum sidewalk to second storey fl oor height of 22 feet. d. Upper storey height i. Th e maximum clear height (fl oor to ceiling) for upper storeys is 12 feet. ii. At least 80% of each upper storey shall have an interior clear height (fl oor to ceiling) of at least 9 feet. A. Façadei. On each lot the building façade shall be built to within 5 feet of the front property line for at least 75% of it’s length. Th is requirement applies to the building’s fi rst two storeys and to all parts of the lot that abut a street and public sidewalk. ii. Within 10 feet of a block corner, the ground storey façade may be pulled away to form a corner entry. B. Usable Open Spacei. A minimum of 40 square feet per residential unit shall be pro-vided. Th is space may be shared among units, or may take the form of balconies, roof decks, usable portions of green roofs or other above ground amenities. ii. Open space created infront of the building shall be designed as semi-public space, used as a forecourt, outdoor seating or other semi-public uses. C. Garage and Parkingi. Parking garage openings visible from the sidewalk shall have a clear maximum height of 16 feet and a maximum width of 22 feet. ii. Parking shall be located behind the parking setback lineMin 9ftMax 12ft clear (typ) max 22 ft (typ) (typ) (typ) PropertiesMinimum HeightMaximum HeightPublic realm / Private realmResultA form based approach is organized to code development that defi nes the public realm.Example of form-based code standards for a downtown setting. 544/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation Financial FeasibilityFeasibility of fi nancing would include: (1) projections of anticipated costs associated with an initial Phase 1 plan and (2) options for revenues to pay those costs. Th is includes items such as street improvements, streetscape improvements, parking infrastructure, property acquisition (i.e., the bus garage), and community space (both potential “commons” or “public realm” space and “programming” or “community/civic center” space). At this point six potential pools or “buckets” of revenue have been identifi ed:1. TIF, Abatement, and other statutory economic development tools;2. Special Assessments;3. Enhanced Property Tax revenues generated by private property development;4. Other Public Sources of funds;5. Non-Profi t or Philanthropic Fundraising; and6. City Tax Revenues.1. TIF, Abatement, and Other Statutory Economic Development Tools.Access some portion of existing TIF Funds; there may be an opportunity to use existing TIF funds. Determine the circumstances under which that is possible and the consequences of doing so.Create a new TIF district. TIF and Abatement tools provide opportunities to “capture” increased value and use it to fi nance some parts of redevelopment. Determine a sense of the potential numbers associated with these options and any limits on how the funds generated by these mechanisms can be spent.2. Special Assessments and Related Tools. Th e City may assess properties that “benefi t” from public improvements for the costs of these improvements up to the value of the benefi t conferred by the improvements. Determine what types of costs are eligible to be recovered using this tool and on related tools that permit the creation of special districts to spread the ongoing costs of maintenance or other improvements. Th e 50th and France area may provide a model for this. 3. Enhanced Property Tax Revenues Generated by Private Development. Th is idea overlaps to a certain extent with #1 above (to the extent the enhanced value will be “captured” via TIF or Abatement). Obviously, the greatest increase of this type would be new development on parcels (like the Public Works and School Bus Garage sites). And consider the prospect of enhanced value emanating from redevelopment of sites (e.g., CSM, Eden 100, etc.) that are already on the tax rolls; having some models of what is reasonable to expect in this category is important.4. Other Public Sources of Funds. Consider the potential partnerships with other public entities that might be able to help with funding. Th e planning activities in this phase of the process have been funded by the Met Council; there might be a prospect of additional funds as planning and implementation move forward. Met Council representatives have also been clear in expressing interest in park and ride facilities. In addition to the Met Council, there are prospects for partnership with MnDOT (related to Highway 100) and Hennepin County (related to Vernon Avenue). To the extent that housing is a part of future redevelopment, there may be Regional, State, and/or Federal funds available to support those eff orts. Th ese any other prospective sources of “Other Public Funds” should be summarized and estimated. 5. Non-Profi t and Philanthropic Fundraising.Consider that private contributions could help with funding. Th ese potential sources of revenue fall into two categories: (1) funds from existing non-profi t organizations interested in supporting particular development initiatives (e.g., housing, arts, etc.) and (2) fundraising campaigns created specifi cally for this eff ort. Determine what is reasonable to expect from each “bucket” and be able to determine whether the “gap” remaining after all other “buckets” are utilized can be fi lled by some kind of capital campaign.6. City Tax Revenues. Th e other way to fi ll any remaining gap is with City tax revenues. Obviously, this is a decision for the City Council to make. It will be important to identify the size of the gap (if any) that will likely need to be fi lled by such funding. 554/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementationPossible Staging Questions1. Interim use. Designation of City parking ramp for park and ride?2. Disposition of School Bus Garage Site. Can City negotiate control? If so, when and what are the next steps? RFI? RFP? Negotiate existing user in the District to acquire and invest. 3. How can public works site be best utilized in the interim? As temporary (2-3 year) school bus garage operations? As surface park and ride until structure is built? RFI? RFP? Interim use could allow time for community building use/need to be determined. 4. How to leverage adjacent parcels with timing of bus garage site redevelopment?5. What is timing/feasibility of west side frontage road/southbound ramp confi guration? How to advance that agenda in the short term (1-5 years).6. Eden could / should be programmed for Living Streets improvements consistent with initial phases of development. 7. Feasibility of timing of street, bridge, and deck improvements. 24617365Vernon AveEden AveHwy 100 4/05/125. Appendix 574/05/125. AppendixImplementationHwy 100Eden AveArcadia AvePhase 1ACBEDVernon AveCommunity Green Space on top of Parking StructureHousingWagner / OLG PropertyTh e following Implementation section is included as one example of anticipating an initial, or phase 1, increment and associated preliminary range of costs. Th ese numbers are not detailed costs but represent one possible range of expenditures that are included here to illustrate levels of funding (and investment) of various components. Th e Phase 1 diagram and following spreadsheets for the public works site, the bus garage site and local street improvements will vary depending on actual funding sources, timing, program, and other factors (e.g., cost of materials and labor) that cannot be determined at this time.Phase 1A. Public Works Site• Community Commons: GrandView Crossing (street) GrandView Green Community/Civic Building• Arcadia Steps• Community Civic building• Variety of residential building types• Structured parking• Park and ride structureB. Bus Garage Site• Multi-level parking• Retail / service offi ce use• Possible drive - thru useC. Warner Site• Townhouses fronting the OLG open spaceD. Eden Avenue Streetscape• Bus stop integrated• Boulevard organizes intersection alignmentsE. Jerry’s Streetscape• Pedestrian enhancements• Streetscape• Stormwater treatment 584/05/125. AppendixImplementation GrandViewSmallAreaPlanDevelopmentProgramͲBusGarageSiteSF Ac LF Units PrkSpaces Const$Mkt$Tax$sf/$ unit/sfNonͲresidentialcommercial 5,000 950,000.00$190.00$office 42,000 7,980,000.00$190.00$rampparking 75 937,500.00$12,500.00$surfaceparking 75 112,500.00$1,500.00$47,000 150 9,980,000.00$ 594/05/125. AppendixImplementationGrandViewSmallAreaPlanDevelopmentProgramͲPublicWorksSiteSF Ac LF Units PrkSpaces Const$Mkt$Tax$sf/$ unit/sf unitcostResidentialtownhouse 16 46 8,832,000.00$160 1200 192000smallhouse 0 150 1200 180000apartment 42 64 6,426,000.00$170 900 153000condo 24 48 5,472,000.00$190 1200 228000Total 82 158 20,730,000.00$NonͲresidentialcommercial150office150community 50,000 10,000,000.00$200parking200 3,500,000.00$17,500parknride 200 3,500,000.00$17,500Total 400 17,000,000.00$ 604/05/125. AppendixImplementationGrandViewSmallAreaPlanDevelopmentProgramͲInfrastructureandStreetsLF Ac PrkSpaces Const$Mkt$Tax$sf/$ unit/sf unitcostInfrastructureVernon(*) 950 332,500.00$350crosswalk 5 25,000.00$5000roadway 1,500,000.00$EdenWest(*) 385 134,750.00$350EdenEast 200 70,000.00$350crosswalk 3 15,000.00$5000roadway 1,500,000.00$Jerrysstreet 875 306,250$350$GusYoungext(*) 150 52,500$350$OLGroad 150 52,500.00$350Bridges(EST)eachGͲViewCrossing 750,000.00$estCPRail 750,000.00$estsubtotal 5,488,500.00$HWY100Splitdiamond(est) $10,000,000Ped/Bike(est) 1,500,000.00$(*)ͲDoesnotincludebudgetsforroadwayimprovements/updgrades/reconstructionͲbudgetsareforlandscape/streetscapeonly 614/05/125. AppendixVernon and InterchangeTransportation 624/05/125. AppendixVernonTransportation 634/05/125. AppendixTransportationSplit Diamond 644/05/125. AppendixTransportationSplit Diamond 654/05/125. AppendixDesign AlternativesLibrary / Eden / LinkProposed Illustrative Plan (p.16)Alternative 1Alternative 2Alternative 3: Streetscape improvements 664/05/125. AppendixDesign AlternativesArcadia and Gus YoungProposed Illustrative Plan (p. 16) Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Date: May 18, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Sketch Plan Review for 4911 77th Street West Discussion CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: No action requested. Provide the applicant non-binding feedback on a potential future development project. INTRODUCTION: The City Council is asked to consider a sketch plan request to redevelop 4911 77th Street West, which is part of the Pentagon Park South P UD that was approved in 2019. The applicant, Solomon Real Estate and Rise Development, is proposing to develop the vacant lot in the southeast corner of the Pentagon South development, with a 6-story, 200-unit apartment. Ten percent (10%) of the units would be for affordable housing. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Memo to the Planning Commission, May 12 Applicant Narrative and Proposed Plans Approved Overall PUD Plan for Pentagon South Approved Overall PUD Plan for this Site City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City Hall • Phone 952-927-8861 Fax 952-826-0389 • www.CityofEdina.com Date: May 12, 2021 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Sketch Plan Review – 4911 77th Street West The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan request to redevelop 4911 77th Street West, which is part of the Pentagon Park South PUD that was approved in 2019. The applicant, Solomon Real Estate and Rise Development, is proposing to develop the vacant Lot in the southeast corner of the Pentagon South development, with a 6-story, 200-unit apartment. Ten percent (10%) of the units would be for affordable housing. The overall development site in the PUD is 12.5 acres. The uses approved within the PUD include retail space, a 193-room hotel, a 153-room hotel, and a parking ramp in phase one; and phase two included two 5-story office buildings, a parking ramp (expansion) and 19,000 square feet of office/retail. (See approved Overall PUD Plans.) The approved plans for the specific site we are looking at called for the development of the 5-story 153 room hotel. The proposal is to amend the Overall Development Plan to replace the hotel with a 200-unit apartment. The request would require the following: 1. A Zoning Ordinance Amendment to change the use and approved development plans for this site within the existing PUD District. The PUD Zoning is also used to ensure affordable housing on the site. The table on the following page demonstrates how the proposed new building(s) would comply with the existing PUD standards on the lot. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Compliance Table Issues/considerations: Density. The site is 12.5 acres. This would be the only housing within the development; therefore, the density is 16 units per acre. The applicant is agreeable to meeting the affordable housing policy. Proposed Use. The proposed project introduces housing into the area; housing could begin to activate the area after 5 pm when the offices close and could assist the retail. Housing would be a good fit for this existing PUD. Traffic and parking. A traffic and parking study would be required. Proposed heights. The proposed height of 5-6 stories is within the maximum requirement of 12 stories. Pedestrian connection to the park. Final development plans should include a more prominent connection to Fred Richards Park from 77th Street. Consideration should be given to improved pedestrian connections from Viking Drive into the development on the west side of the PUD-17 Proposed Setbacks - Buildings 77th Street Computer Avenue Normandale Boulevard Viking Drive 15 feet 15 feet 50 feet 10 Feet NA 15 feet NA 10 feet Building Height 12 stories & 144 feet per the height overlay district 6 stories and 68 feet Parking lot and drive aisle setback 20 feet 20 feet Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.5% 1.5% City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 apartments. This was a big issue with approval of the hotel. (Note the sidewalks on the west side of the hotel in the approved plans for 2019. Sustainability. The applicant will be asked to submit the sustainability questionnaire as part of a formal application. Consider a green roof installation to reduce the impacts of the urban heat island and improve energy efficiency. Consider including EV-ready parking stalls, and at least 5% parking stalls with EV chargers. Sketch Plan Application Narrative For the Pentagon Village Apartments on Lot 3 Pentagon Village Master Planned Community: Pentagon Village is a mixed-use community located at the southeast intersection of Highway 100 and West 77th Street. The approximate 12.5-acre property has been improved with new infrastructure, including the Plaza at Pentagon Village as well as the initial phase of the parking ramp containing 423- stalls. There are five lots within the project for vertical development. These lots were approved with the following uses as part of the approved PUD for the Pentagon Village master plan: • Lot 1 Two retail buildings containing approximately 12,020 square feet of space. • Lot 2 A five-story, 235-room dual branded Marriot Hotel. • Lot 3 A five story, 153-room extended stay hotel concept. • Lot 4 A mixed-use retail/office building containing approximately 20,000 square feet. • Lot 5 An office building containing approximately 160,000 square feet. Pentagon Village is intended to be a densely populated master plan which promotes internal connectivity to buildings within the site, as well as, to connect to the uses and amenities of the surrounding community. The Pentagon Village master plan anticipated a variety of uses including multi-story offices, hotels, multi-family housing, retail, restaurants and parking structures to support such uses. The Pentagon Village master plan was designed and guided by a combination of market-driven demand elements, the six Guiding Principles approved in 2014, and the city’s France Avenue Southdale Area Working Principles. Give-to-Get; Plan & Process Allow latitude to gain tangible and intangible outcomes aligned with the district principles. The Pentagon Village moves beyond the Guiding Principles by providing a significant visual amenity along Highway 100 and the West 77th Street corridor. With its density of buildings, mix of uses, and strong architectural presence, Pentagon Village will become a gateway into the City of Edina as its development gets completed. The West 77th Street corridor is anchored by Pentagon Village as a multi- use destination connected by several modes of travel including pedestrian, bicycle, bus, and automobile which will enhance connectivity throughout the surrounding community. Pentagon Village recognizes the advantage of connecting to the community with a prominent main entry and pedestrian connection to the future Fred Richards Park and Nine Mile Regional Trail system across West 77th Street. The inclusion of internal open space and visually prominent green spaces and hardscape associated with the Pentagon Village Plaza enhance the pedestrian patterns and provide an attractive opportunity for the buildings and uses on this site to be accessible to the surrounding community. City of Edina Sketch Plan Application Narrative Pentagon Village – Lot 3 Page 2 Pentagon Village will promote energy and excitement at this gateway location into the City of Edina and will increase value and opportunity to the surrounding properties and community while encouraging future redevelopment activity along the West 77th Street corridor. Edina Cultural Preferences Identity Advance quality through thoughtful and artful design of buildings and publicly accessible spaces, highlighted human activity, and enhanced economic vibrancy. The site design and building placement has been oriented to provide appealing views into the site and to all building front doors. The Pentagon Village Plaza and its various art installations are thoughtfully organized to enhance views into the site from West 77th Street and surrounding properties. Building corners and entries have been designed to incorporate major architectural features facing key vantage points. The buildings will incorporate design schemes that reflect elements that are inspired by the cultural context of Minnesota. Contemporary design elements will include timeless materials including natural and architectural precast stone, glass and metal panels. All building front entries are oriented to the Pentagon Village Plaza. This helps visitors visually orient themselves to their destination and provides a sense of security through pedestrian visibility. The public green open areas surrounding the Plaza are intended to be an amenity to the buildings located next to them. Building occupants can activate these spaces and be engaged with others. The relationship to open spaces beyond the property lines will keep this location active and visible within the community. By providing new uses and strong amenities, Pentagon Village enhances economic viability, job creation, and an increased tax base for the City of Edina. The multiple uses of the Pentagon Village development plan including office, hotels, housing and restaurants are intended to provide economic activity throughout most day and evening hours. Comprehensive Connections; Movement Foster a logical, safe, inviting and expansive public realm facilitating movement of people within and to the district. Each building within Pentagon Village has a more intimate green space area that connects and weaves into the larger site green spaces infrastructure. The Pentagon Village master plan organizes open green spaces so that they are separate but connected. Each green space is framed by buildings and their main entrances but can also be accessed by walkways from other parts of the site internally, as well as, from the surrounding community. Sidewalks and bike connections from the community are continued into the site along the green spaces and along the building entries. Parking structure vertical circulation is intended to be located on these sidewalk connections. The design intention is to allow pedestrian circulation between all buildings on the site with obvious and clear paths, allowing activity and security. Connection to the bicycle paths within the community are accommodated at the main entry points. By providing parking structures for the majority of auto use, the interior streets can be safely co-used for pedestrian and bicycle traffic. All pedestrian sidewalks on site are clearly visible and separated from auto and bicycle traffic patterns. The proposed open and green spaces incorporate seating areas and other amenities for pedestrian enjoyment. Wayfinding will help orientate visitors onsite and provide information for community-wide connection opportunities. City of Edina Sketch Plan Application Narrative Pentagon Village – Lot 3 Page 3 Site Design; Transitions Encourage parcel-appropriate intensities promoting harmonious and interactive relationship without “leftover” spaces on sites. The Pentagon Village master plan includes a variety of multi-story buildings intended to support and enhance the existing building density within the immediate surrounding community. Providing height and shared parking over a typical suburban scale development provides for efficient use of built space and greater opportunities for green space, for an overall design supportive of the Guiding Principles and Southdale Area Working Principles. The design of the site and buildings incorporate strong views from Highway 100 with a more expressive architectural design and potential greater building scale. Buildings, parking structures and view corridors are organized around green and open spaces. Entries to buildings and site circulation is clearly visible from these open spaces. Sight lines are controlled with landscape elements while still allowing views into the property. It is intended that building architecture is highlighted at strategic corners along sight lines into the property from the district. The retail buildings located along West 77th Street provide easy access to pedestrian and auto traffic. These retail parcels have been oriented to visually anchor and frame the main entry and accommodate outdoor seating areas. The Pentagon Village master plan addresses the zones of activity surrounding the property by organizing building placement, site access points, and open space with purposeful connections. The west property line faces Highway 100 and this activity is addressed by orienting an office building to take advantage of quick views from automobiles. Architectural materials, building roof decks, tenant and property signs are best oriented to the west. The West 77th Street overpass (over Highway 100) is elevated and site access and visibility is limited. An open green space, associated with the west building, is positioned in the curve of the overpass. Retail uses are located on the north and west side of the property. These locations are compatible with the retail, residential and/or office uses on the opposite side of West 77th Street, and the future uses planned within the Pentagon Park North redevelopment adjacent to the Fred Richards Park. This position also allows for the retail access to be separated and contro lled from the other uses on the property. The east side is organized around building edges pushed to the street helping define the master plan density and city patterns. The prominent Pentagon Village Plaza contains a number of beautiful art components by famed local sculptor, James Brenner, which provide a visual cue into the site from the corner of West 77th Street and Computer Avenue. An east-west access at mid-block allows automobile connection to parking structure and drop off areas of building entries. The south side provides access to parking structures, which incorporates shared parking opportunities and is associated with other existing auto-oriented uses nearby such as the existing car wash on the southwest corner lot. City of Edina Sketch Plan Application Narrative Pentagon Village – Lot 3 Page 4 Land Use; Live-able Precincts Promote well-balanced aggregations of “come to” and “stay at” places focused on human activity and linked to an engaging public realm. The Pentagon Village master plan provides for a mix of uses that create a well-balanced aggregation of places that encourage a live-able precinct that will draw people to the property. The strategic integration of office, housing, restaurants and hospitality uses cross-promote user activity within the site. With sufficient public parking and visible pedestrian and bike paths connecting to the nearby Fred Richards Park and Regional Trail system, Pentagon Village encourages and supports community connectivity and activity. Economic Vitality Ensure every component contributes to the sustained economic vitality of the district and the community. Pentagon Village’s mix of uses with its incorporation of office, hospitality, housing and restaurants combined with accessible and connected green spaces will draw people to the area both from outside and from within the community. The onsite and area amenities will appeal to site employers who recognize that retaining and attracting talent is a priority. This activity will support other nearby businesses and contribute to the sustained economic vitality of the community in which it serves. The property is very accessible from a network of regional highways and city roadways. The Pentagon Village master plan will enhance and support development on adjacent or nearby sites with the number of people that it will draw to the local community leading to a more energized and activated area. With the completion of Pentagon Village, a new and enhanced gateway will be established into the City of Edina that will create momentum and demand for further redevelopment. This gateway will also enhance the exposure and interest for the Fred Richards Park and utilization of the Regional Trail system to not only those people living within the City of Edina but also to those that desire to visit and take advantage of these unique amenities. Sketch Plan Application for Lot 3 This Sketch Plan application specifically relates to the proposed development on Lot 3 where we are changing the use from an extended stay hotel to a multi-family housing project. While no formal name for the project has yet been identified, the project will be called Pentagon Village Apartments for the purposes of this application. Multi-Family Housing Project Description The proposed building will include approximately 200 for-rent apartment units in five levels. It is anticipated that the building will also include one level of covered on-grade parking. Additional parking will be available in a small surface lot and in the existing parking structure on the adjacent lot. Continuing with the approach of crafted views into the site and having all building front doors have a connection to Pentagon Village as a whole, this building has been positioned on the site to create a welcoming and connected entry experience for guests and residents alike. At the second level, the U-shaped building wraps a courtyard amenity deck which opens to the south, having the potential to further activate and City of Edina Sketch Plan Application Narrative Pentagon Village – Lot 3 Page 5 enhance the street edge along Viking Drive. This building will become an integral part of Pentagon Village and help to balance the development, activating the site with permanent residents 24 hours a day. The residents will enjoy the convenient access to the surrounding amenities, ease of access to various types of transportation, and the welcoming open and green spaces throughout Pentagon Village. Commitment to Sustainable Development The design of this residential building will fulfill a commitment and holistic approach to sustainable design taking into consideration energy use, water use, place making, ecology, materials, circularity of products (supply chain), as well as equity and justice for both the residents and the neighborhood. This building will be constructed with Modular units by RISE modular. Modular construction is inherently sustainable for a variety of reasons including but not limited to a substantial reduction in construction waste, less disturbance of the site during construction, decrease in energy consumption during construction, and overall emissions decrease by minimizing construction deliveries to the site. The site will be thoughtfully considered in terms of sustainable landscaping (drought tolerant and low water use), permeable surfaces, water treatment, and connection and promotion of alternative transportation. The building construction will include multiple energy and water savings measures throughout. Ultimately, the effort that will be put towards great design and the use of quality construction methods will facilitate the construction of a landmark building at the edge of the Pentagon Village development. These measures will ensure the longevity of the use of this building, making it ultimately sustainable. Commitment to Affordable Housing We recognize the need to provide a range of affordable housing choices for those who live and work in the City of Edina. The Pentagon Village Apartments will provide a minimum of 10% of its residential units at 50% of the average market income (AMI). The development team and ownership of the Pentagon Village Apartments will provide this affordable housing component at no cost to the city or public. www.pentagonvillageedina.com development April 23, 2021PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS21-0068 SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTAL 4911 77th St W Edina, MN Existing Zoning: Planned Unit Development District-17 (PUD-17) Pentagon Park South 1000 ft N➤➤NImage Landsat / Copernicus Image Landsat / Copernicus Image Landsat / Copernicus www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 221-0068 EDINA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Economic Vitality and Competitiveness Urban Design Land Use Transportation and Mobility Parks and Public Life District Services and Facilities Sustainability Water Resources PUBLIC AMENITIES GREATER SOUTHDALE DISTRICT Concentration of jobs, residences, medical services, traffic, and activity. Attracting residents, workers, customers, patients, visitors, and others from throughout the region, Greater Southdale District is a major destination. Role as economic engine for the city and region. The economic impact of this area is significant, particularly in terms of sustaining the tax base for the City of Edina. Meeting diverse housing needs of the population. Greater Southdale District has a variety of diverse housing types that meet the needs of Edina residents, and are not generally available in many areas of the city. Retail and services hub for the community. In addition to its role in the regional economy, Greater Southdale District meets the needs of the community for retail and services, with the capacity to evolve for changing preferences. Capacity for growth and change. The Greater Southdale District has been an evolving area since its inception. It has more capacity for growth and change than many other areas of the city. GREATER SOUTHDALE DISTRICT CORE ELEMENTS SITE AS MOBILITY HUB Mobility Hubs. Bringing together different modes of travel – walking, transit, biking, and shared mobility - and integrating the location with information technology to help travelers find, access, and pay for transit and shared mobility services creates a mobility hub. Strategically locating mobility hubs at gateways to the District (Southdale Center, Centennial Lakes and near Highway 100 in the 76th Street/77th Street corridor), encourages people to access the heart of the district by modes other than cars. A network of green, lined by community-focused destinations will create a diverse set of opportunities for people to participate as a community across the Greater Southdale District. The red dots represent mobility hubs and the yellow circles represent ½ mile walking distance. The intent of the Mobility Hub location is to encourage pedestrian to use the central-spine-like Centennial Lakes Park and or the Promenade as the main corridor to get to events, shopping and home. For residents, the experience of walking home should be the best part of the day, marked by a chance encounter, a pickup game of basketball, or an early meal out. The same can be said for visitors arriving at one the three Mobility Hubs: “It’s never too far to walk to where you want to go within the Greater Southdale District!” SITE SITE www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 321-0068 Modular Constructiono Reduction in construction waste compared to typical stick-built constructiono Completing site and foundation work in parallel to modular manufacturing helps to reduce overall construction duration by 30% to 50% minimizing disruption to surrounding neighborhood.o Minimization of site disturbance during staging and construction o Controlled production environment minimizes site risks while improving build quality and worker safety.o Decreases energy consumption during constructiono Reduction of overall emissions by decreasing deliveries to site Energy and Carbon o Building will benchmark, report yearly energy consumption per the Efficient Building Benchmarking Ordinance (City of Edina) o Reduction in energy use through well-insulated building, inherent in modular construction o Utilize Xcel Energy’s Energy Design Assistance o LED lighting throughout Water and Wastewater o Looking at the percentage of pervious surface on the property and maintaining as much as possible o Water conserving plumbing fixtures throughout o Efficient plumbing layout and design o Potential for non-potable water reuse o Thoughtful stormwater management o Efficient irrigation and potential water reuse strategies Place and Ecologyo Take into consideration how the landscaping can support the natural ecosystem o Will carefully consider what % of landscape, % Rain gardens, % native plants, % pollinator friendly plants can be usedo Increase tree canopy at property (zero trees currently on site)o Drought tolerant landscapeo Pollinator friendly landscapeo Green outdoor amenity deck: amenity lawn / garden conceals parking below podium Materials and Circularity o Manage construction waste o Waste management plan for building o Recycling provided for residential units o Potential for organics recycling / composting to be provided for residential units o Use of products with recycled content and ingredient transparency as much as possible o Use of regional materials where possible Equity and Justice o 10% of residential units will be affordable o Promote alternative transportation o Bicycle parking near main entry for guests o Interior, sheltered bicycle storage for residents o Potential for EV charging stations to be provided o Potential to provide parking for car-sharing vehicles REGENERATIVE DESIGN AND SUSTAINABILITY www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 421-0068 2000 ft N➤➤N Image Landsat / Copernicus Image Landsat / Copernicus Image Landsat / Copernicus Edina Projections 2010 2020 2030 2040 Population 47,941 55,000 60,000 63,600 Households 20,672 24,000 27,700 29,800 Employment 47,457 51,800 54,000 56,100 100 494 VIKING DRIVE COMPUTER AVE77TH ST. W trailpublic transit route transit stop park wetland Highly Connected Located in 9 Mile Creek Watershed Challenged Water Table Borders City of Bloomington Main Roads Trails / Transit Wetlands and Parks SITE MAP Nord Myr Park Fred Richards Park www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 521-0068 9 MILE CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL Imagery ©2021 Maxar Technologies, U.S. Geological Survey, USDA Farm Service Agency, Map data ©2021 200 ft Image capture: May 2018 Images may be subject to copyright. Hema latha Thotakura Photo - May 2018 Fred Richards Park 9 Mile Creek Trail9 Mile Creek Trail On Street Trail FRED RICHARDS PARK PENTAGON VILLAGE SITE CONTEXT FOOD JOBS PARKS SCHOOLS www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 621-0068 SITE FROM SOUTH SITE FROM EAST LOT 3 - FROM EAST PLAZA TRELLIS PARKING STRUCTURE SITE ENTRY FROM EAST PLAZA VIEW OF PARKING STRUCTURE PLAZA VIEW OF PARKING STRUCTURE EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS THE PLAZA AT PENTAGON VILLAGE EXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE THE PLAZA AT PENTAGON VILLAGE EXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 721-0068 The master plan is organized around The Plaza at Pentagon Village framed with the buildings, creating a village commons. Ample green space and landscaping allow people to access the plaza from surrounding neighborhood and the building front doors. The office space and a dual brand hotel surround the plaza, with retailers and restaurants easily accessible via pedestrian walkways. Designed as a programmable space, the plaza will host events, concerts and other social opportunities year-round. Two retail spaces frame the entrance and act as the front doors to the development. The master plan highlights the building exteriors with an “urban edge” design style. This makes the architectural details of the buildings visible from the nearby highways. Materials like aluminum, metal, glass and landscaped screen walls add texture and depth to the buildings. PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN PROPOSED SITE www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 821-0068 PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN - LOT 3 EXTENDED STAY HOTEL PROPOSED APARTMENT BUILDING 6 STORY APARTMENT BUILDING PROPOSED CHANGE OF USE - LOT 3 www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 921-0068 LOT 5 - PROPOSED OFFICE RENDER LOT 5 - PROPOSED OFFICE RENDER LOT 2 - APPROVED HOTEL ELEVATION LOT 1 - EXISTING COMMERCIAL ELEVATION LOT 1 - EXISTING COMMERCIAL ELEVATION LOT 1 - EXISTING COMMERCIAL ELEVATION LOT 1 - EXISTING COMMERCIAL ELEVATION PENTAGON VILLAGE DESIGN CHARACTER FOR REFERENCE ONLY www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 1021-0068 VIKING DRIVE PARKING RAMP COMPUTER AVENUESITE PLAN 1 2 3 Entry Lobby Art Walk Residential Patios 4 5 6 Pool Fire Pit Bike Lounge 7 8 Bike Parking Move In Zone 1 2 4 6 5 8 7 DEDICATED SPACE FOR EASE OF LARGER SIZED VEHICLES TO PARK AS NEW RESIDENTS MOVE. DEDICATED PARKING FOR BIKERS ADJACENT TO THE BIKE LOUNGE AND EXTERIOR TRAILS. INDOOR AMENITY WITH QUICK CONNECTION TO THE OUTSIDE TRAIL CONNECTIONS WITH BIKE PARKING. OUTDOOR AMENITY FOR SOCIAL GATHERING THAT HAS VIEW OUT OF THE CITY. THE PRIMARY EXTERIOR AMENITY ON THE AMENITY DECK. PROVIDES EXTERIOR PRIVATE SPACES FOR LOWER LEVEL RESI- DENTS THE MAIN WALK TO THE BUILDING AND CAMPUS. CREATES A UNIQUE EXPERIENCE AND SENSE OF ARRIVAL. WELCOME GUESTS AND RESIDENTS WITH ART, LANDSCAPE, OR EXTERIOR FEATURE AS THEY ENTER THE BUILDING.. 9 Stormwater Management Strategies BELOW GRADE FILTRATION TANKS. CAPTURE AND TREAT STORMWATER ON SITE. 3 3 39 www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 1121-0068 EXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE INTERNAL DRIVE VIKING DRIVE COMPUTER AVELOBBY BIKELOUNGEENCLOSED PARKING FLEXIBLE SPACEFLOOR PLAN - GROUND FLOOR www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 1221-0068 AMENITY SPACE UNITS UNITS AMENITY DECK FLOOR PLAN - 2ND FLOOR www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 1321-0068 UNITS UNITS FLOOR PLANS - 3RD - 6TH FLOOR www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 1421-0068 0' 68'PROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINEVIKING DRIVE COMPUTER AVEEXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE PROPERTYLINEFUTURE HOTEL FUTURE HOTEL 5 STORIES OF TYPE IIIB 1 STORY OF TYPE 1 FUTURE COMMERCIAL INTERNAL DRIVE 0' 68' ~71' T.O. PARAPET 5 STORIES OF TYPE IIIB 1 STORY OF TYPE 1 MASSING SECTION - BUILDING HEIGHTS BUILDING SECTION DIAGRAM - EAST/WEST BUILDING SECTION DIAGRAM - NORTH/SOUTH www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 1521-0068 Total Bldg. GSF 232,965 Total Acres 1.78 Density (U.P.A.)107.01 Total SF 77,340 Level 1 Coverage (%) 72% FAR 3.01 Level 1 55,800 Level 2 36,485 Level 3 35,170 Level 4 35,170 Level 5 35,170 Level 6 35,170 232,965 New Parking Stalls Surface 5 Parking Structure (first level of proposed apartment building)161 Existing Parking Stalls (used for the proposed aparment building) Surface 0 Parking Structure 84 Parking Stalls/ Unit 1.25 T O T A L P A R K I N G 250 S I T E M E T R I C S T O T A L B U I L D I N G M E T R I C S Gross Building S Q U A R E F O O T A G E B Y F L O O R AXON VIEW FROM THE SOUTH WEST AXON VIEW FROM THE SOUTH EAST AXON VIEW FROM THE NORTH WEST AXON VIEW FROM THE NORTH EAST MASSING CO M P U T E R A V E COMPUTER AVEVIKING BLV D 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 1 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 4 SITE PLAN REST /RET 1 REST / RET 2 RETOFFICE OFFICE1 OFFICE2 PARKING DECK BELOW DUAL BRANDHOTEL (1) EXTENDED STAY HOTEL (2) PARKING DECK BELOW EXTENDED STAY HOTEL (2) 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 5 DATA TABLE SUMMARY OFFICE 1 OFFICE 2 HOTEL 1 HOTEL 2 PARKING (office) PARKING (hotel) RETAIL 1 RETAIL 2 RETAIL / OFFICE 25,000sf per floor5 floors125,000sf total 20,000sf per floor5 floors100,000sf total 193 keys4 floors 153 keys4 floors 1,155 spaces 390 spaces 7,500 sf 4,300 sf 19,000 sf 70 spaces 125spaces REST /RET 1 REST / RET 2 RET /OFFICE OFFICE1 OFFICE2 PARKING DECK BELOW DUAL BRANDHOTEL (1) EXTENDED STAY HOTEL (2) EXTENDED STAY HOTEL (2) PARKING DECK BELOW 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 14 DIAGRAM: GREEN CONNECTIONS NMCRT&FREDRICHARDSPARK 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 15 SITE ENTRY 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 16 AERIAL LOOKING SOUTH 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 17 NORTHWEST CORNER & PARK 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 27 CENTRAL PARK 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 28 PARK & OFFICE 2 ENTRY 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 29 EXTENDED STAY HOTEL DROP OFF 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 30 PARKING DECK AND HOTEL 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 31 VIKING DRIVE 16 JAN 2019 PENTAGON VILLAGEMASTER PLAN CONCEPT EDINA, MN 3 N WEST 77TH STREET NORMANDALE ROADCOMPUTER AVEVIKING DRIVE PHASE 1 SITE PLAN Site Date: May 18, 2021 Agenda Item #: XII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Lisa A. Schaefer, Assistant City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Budget Work Plan and Financial Report Updates Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Attached are updates through May 2021 in the Budget Work Plan and the latest Quarterly Finance Report. ATTACHMENTS: Description May 2021 Budget Work Plan Updates Q1 2021 Finance Report PUBLISHED May 18, 2021 Page 1 of 10 2020 – 2021 Budget Work Plan Update DEFINITIONS Budget Goal Describes the broad outcomes that must be achieved through the budget. Budget Objective Defines the measurable results that need to be achieved to meet the goals Strategy/Action Details the specific actions to be taken this budget to meet the objectives. Goal 1: Maintain Physical Assets & Infrastructure It is crucial to maintain City infrastructure including streets, facilities, buildings, equipment and public spaces. Deferred maintenance can lead to costly unplanned repairs and replacements with decisions based on short-term implementation costs, vs. long-term maintenance costs. Properly maintained facilities, streets, water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems provide reliable and efficient operations while lessening the City’s carbon footprint. ONGOING OBJECTIVES: • Incorporate financial, societal and environmental costs into decision-making processes. • Incorporate lifecycle and maintenance costs and climate adaptation design practices to allow more informed decision making. • Provide funding to maintain and replace City facilities, assets and equipment in a manner that avoids deferred maintenance, prevents emergency repair and replaces assets at the most cost-effective time. • Manage the City’s facilities, operations, equipment and capital investments in a manner that increases energy efficiency, reduces the City’s carbon footprint and GHG emissions and meets sustainability goals. • Design and build for resiliency in the infrastructure that reduces flooded structures, improves water quality (drinking and surface) and increases filtered drinking water production. 2020-2021 BUDGET OBJECTIVES • As debt levies expire, increase the CIP Levy to establish reliable funding for ongoing building maintenance, replacement and capital improvements. • Capture the Southdale TIF tax capacity for 2022 CIP. • Reduce the City operations’ total electricity GHG emissions by 5 percent, 893,000 kWh each year, through implementation of energy management plans, ongoing facility maintenance, capital improvements and operational behavior change. • Implement Green Fleet Policy recommendations to meet goal of 30 percent emission reduction mpg and gas usage by 2025. • Improve security and safety in City facilities for public and staff. 2020-2021 Strategy/Action Dept Lead Target PUBLISHED May 18, 2021 Page 2 of 10 2020 – 2021 Budget Work Plan Update 1 Approve architectural option and complete construction of Water Plant #5. Engineering Q4 2021 ON HOLD 05/06/2021 Project moved to 2026 in CIP and looking for potential opportunities to partner with a developer. 2 Create a green building policy for City facilities incorporating sustainability principles into evaluation, design and construction of City capital projects. (Connected with project 3-2). Engineering Q2 2021 IN PROGRESS 05/06/2021 Internal working group has draft policy. Review by ELT in June. Adoption July. 3 Determine interim park and recreational uses of Fred Richards Park. Update cost plan estimate prior to CIP process. Parks & Rec Q2 2020 COMPLETE 05/13/2021 Master plan cost estimates updated for LOST proposal, uses identified and current implementation for art center programming use. 4 Identify funding source and timeline for implementation for Braemar Park Master Plan by Q3 2020. Prioritize master plan components for future implementation. Ensure that master plan costing is updated prior to CIP process. Parks & Rec Q3 2020 COMPLETE 05/13/2021 Master plan cost estimates included for LOST proposal and CIP review. Waiting for conclusion of legislative session to realize LOST outcome. 5 Consider options for using alternative funding methods for park improvements and determine next steps. Finance Q2 2022 IN PROGRESS 05/13/2021 Move to 2022 workplan. Waiting for conclusion of legislative session to realize LOST outcome. 6 Develop a master plan for addressing City Hall deferred maintenance, energy efficiency, security and service needs in a cost-effective manner. Engineering (Facilities) Q3 2021 IN PROGRESS 05/06/2021 Security improvements completed, City Hall Master Plan in CIP for 2021 suggest delaying this to 2022 after staffing model post-COVID are implemented. Energy Management Plan 50% complete. 7 Implement decision (to be made in 2019) regarding street assessment financing and transition plan if applicable. If local option sales tax is selected, seek State legislative approval to request that voters approve a local option sales tax for regional park improvements and MSA street improvements. Finance Q2 2020 State approval Q4 2021 Referend um IN PROGRESS 05/06/2021 Task Force completed work March 2021. Assessment Policy Revising in April 2021 by removing retaining walls and sub-cuts from assessments. Council Work Session scheduled for June 1 to continue policy discussion. Decision needed by council by August 2021. 8 Approve a water quality strategy for Lake Cornelia. Engineering Q4 2021 PUBLISHED May 18, 2021 Page 3 of 10 2020 – 2021 Budget Work Plan Update ON HOLD 05/06/2021 Most likely moved to 2022 due to Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project and Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Amendment work load. May have capacity by Q4 2021 to begin this work item. 9 Upgrade the communication equipment (SCADA) that monitors and ensures delivery of safe potable water and improve our ability to have a reliable storm and sanitary sewer system. Public Works Q4 2020 IN PROGRESS 05/13/2021 Contractor has begun work. Work anticipated to be complete in Q2 2022 10 Develop and begin implementation of the street lighting system and maintenance plan that balances sustainability, public safety, and quality of life goals, including increasing energy efficiency, ensuring safely lit community, and minimizing light pollution. Engineering Q4 2021 IN PROGRESS 05/06/2021 2020 No work occurred due to budget adjustments made in response to COVID-19 Pandemic. 2021 new lights being installed 69th Street – east of York. Lighting plans being developed near Edenborough. Street light system is owned and operated between City and Xcel Energy. Any Xcel light greater than 25-years old will not be maintained by them. City is underfunded to address the potential of an additional 315 lights from Xcel. 11 Prepare for possible conversion of Centennial Lakes from Enterprise fund to General fund in 2022-23 budget cycle. Finance Q2 2021 IN PROGRESS 05/13/2021 Under consideration for the 2022-23 Budget. PUBLISHED May 18, 2021 Page 4 of 10 2020 – 2021 Budget Work Plan Update Goal 2: Maintain Service Levels that Best Meet the Needs of the Community The City delivers a variety of services, including police and fire response, water and sewer, snow plowing and building inspections, that are essential for the safety and wellbeing of those who live, work or visit Edina. In addition, amenities and services including recreation facilities, parks and programs contribute to the overall quality of life within the community. To deliver reliable service, the City needs to recruit and retain a strong workforce that has the resources and technology needed to effectively and efficiently perform their work. ONGOING OBJECTIVES • Comply with legal and safety standards. • Maintain adequate response times. • Provide high-quality services in an efficient manner that demonstrates respect for the public. • Promote an engaging and respectful work culture that values employee quality of life and work/life balance. • Provide competitive employee compensation and benefits to attract and retain a skilled and high- performing workforce. • Provide staffing, tools, equipment, resources and training to meet expectations for service delivery. • Utilize effective technology to easily maintain and locate data for the public, reduce risk and provide better data for informed decision-making by elected officials and staff. • Ensure that limited resources (money, equipment and time) are deployed in an equitable and sustainable manner. 2020-2021 BUDGET OBJECTIVES • Increase integration of disparate City data systems, (e.g., Financial, Human Resources and Geographic Information Systems) for better decision-making and easier access. • Maintain adequate work-life balance for employees with an increased focus on employee quality of life, stress management, physical and mental well-being. • Provide adjustments to employee compensation to maintain position with market. • Provide benefit increases to and design changes to maintain affordability. 2020-2021 Strategy/Action Dept Lead Target PUBLISHED May 18, 2021 Page 5 of 10 2020 – 2021 Budget Work Plan Update 1 Implement Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System, including: • Project hierarchy and metrics (Q4 2020) • “Go-live” new finance and HR software (Q1 2021) • Begin implementation of UB software (Q1 2021) • “Go-live” new UB system (Q3 2021) Finance See Strategy/ Action IN PROGRESS 05/13/2021 Finance and HR software went live Jan 2021. UB implementation underway. Expected completion May 2022. 2 Determine long-term plan for future of Art Center, including: Program evaluation of community service needs for the Art Center. Ensure critical repairs are made to Art Center to properly continue existing operations in current building for at least 10 years. • Conduct feasibility and infrastructure analysis on existing Art Center building prior to the CIP process. (Q2 2020) • Conduct alternative site analysis and business plan modeling for relocation of the Art Center operations. (Q2 2021) Parks & Rec See Strategy/ Action IN PROGRESS 05/13/2021 Completed infrastructure analysis and reviewing alternate site analysis locations. Reviewed business options with City Council at annual retreat. Moving forward with plans for securing pottery location, and continued decentralized programming locations. 3 Implement rental housing license and inspection program. Health Q1 2020 COMPLETE 5/13/2021 Rental housing inspections had been suspended due to the pandemic and will resume mid-July 2021. 4 Implement Police-Worn Body Cameras. (Q4 2020) Police Q4 2020 COMPLETE Implementation completed in mid-December. Body worn cameras fully deployed and operational. 5 Replace Public Safety Computer-aided Dispatch (CAD) and Record Management System (RMS) Police Q3 2021- See detail IN PROGRESS 05/13/2021 Vendor selected (Tyler Technologies), working with Richfield to determine their level of participation in the project. Richfield on-site demo set for 6/2/21. Hope to execute contract by the end of 3rd quarter. Approx. 18 months from contract signing to go-live (early 2023). Capital funds to be spent over 21-22, will impact 23 operating budget. 6 Decision, finance method and plan for relocating OR expanding Fire Station 2 in order to accommodate 24-hour operations with one fire apparatus, two ambulances and support vehicle. Fire Q4 2020 IN PROGRESS 05/13/2021 Awaiting revised response time maps showing heat-map data for two potential locations. Expect to receive this report from the consultant by the end of May. PUBLISHED May 18, 2021 Page 6 of 10 2020 – 2021 Budget Work Plan Update 7 Determine finance method and plan for Fire Station 3 in the Northeast Quadrant of the City. This station would be of such size to accommodate 24-hour operations with one fire engine, ambulance and support vehicle. Fire Q4 2020 IN PROGRESS 05/13/2021 Developed working conceptual plans for FS3 and identified 3 possible sites for consideration. 8 Conduct first presidential primary under new state legislation. Administration Q1 2020 COMPLETE Voter turnout was 43 percent (6 percent for absentee voting). Turnout was 10 percent lower than estimated by Hennepin County and may have been impacted by the requirement for voters to select a party ballot. Staff is expecting $56,500 in reimbursements from the State. 9 Develop long-term plan for elections absentee voting and storage. Administration Q1 2020 COMPLETE 05/14/2021 Kept absentee voting at City Hall for 2021. Remodeling space in fire station basement for storage is in progress. PUBLISHED May 18, 2021 Page 7 of 10 2020 – 2021 Budget Work Plan Update Goal 3: Plan for Connected & Sustainable Development Redevelopment and renewal of commercial and residential real estate is essential to the vibrancy of the community. Redevelopment will play an integral part of providing an inclusive, high quality of life that the Edina community expects. It is important to ensure plans and policies are relevant today and flexible for tomorrow. Incorporating sustainability principles and standards during redevelopment with the goal of reducing the community’s carbon footprint will be critical to human health and safety. Creating sustainable redevelopment requires forward thinking and preparing for the future. ONGOING OBJECTIVES • Determine, track and meet sustainability goals for metrics such as energy, transportation, water and waste. • Connect neighborhoods, businesses and open spaces. • Support the continued high quality of life offered to residents and those who work in Edina. • Promote affordable lifecycle housing. • Demonstrate resiliency to changing climate and future community needs. 2020-2021 BUDGET OBJECTIVES • Continue installation of sidewalks and shared-use paths (e.g., Twin Loops implementation). • Launch residential curbside organics and recycling (define numbers and goals). • Create affordable/workforce housing (1,220 units by 2030). 2020-2021 Strategy/Action Dept Lead Target 1 Continue development and implement a strategy to create affordable housing units with revenue from the Affordable Housing Policy and from Southdale II TIF District special authority. Community Development Q4 2021 IN PROGRESS 05/13/2021 In progress. Initial thoughts/action so far: Affordable Housing Trust Fund • Expansion of Homes Within Reach Land Trust Program ($850,000 over two years) • Housing Rehab Program approved by HRA in Q1 2021. Documents being drafted for Q2 approval. • Continuation of 4D program (funds already set aside). No interest. • Gap financing for Dugan Plaza (dead) Southdale 2 TIF • 4040 W. 70th site acquisition for up to 118 units of affordable housing • Scattered site rental single-family housing in partnership with Metro HRA • Land acquisition for future affordable housing sites Acquisition of NOAH property (in partnership with affordable housing owner/manager)—on radar and will pursue if opportunities arise. PUBLISHED May 18, 2021 Page 8 of 10 2020 – 2021 Budget Work Plan Update 2 Create and implement a green building policy to incent sustainable building and operational practices for new development and redevelopment. (Connected with 1-2) Engineering Q3 2021 IN PROGRESS 05/06/2021 Internal and external working groups are working on draft framework of policy. 3 Develop waste reduction goals and implementation plan for residential organics recycling for April 2020 launch. Health Q2 2020 COMPLETE Program began in June. There are 100 tons of organics per month diverted from the waste stream. And a 30 percent participation rate in the organics recycling program. 4 Implement Energy Benchmarking ordinance. Engineering Q4 2021 IN PROGRESS 05/06/2021 Next building size requirement of ordinance is being implemented. Mailing and trainings are complete. Deadline for submission is June 1. Total buildings required to submit data is approximately 400. Looking at possible changes to the ordinance related to water data, energy assessments, and fines. 5 Decide on future of redevelopment of the former Public Works site in the Grandview area by Q2 2021. Community Development Q2 2021 IN PROGRESS 05/13/2021With direction from HRA, staff is working with Frauenshuh and United Properties to explore proposal for a senior cooperative housing on the south side of the site; north side to be determined. Engineering Department is preparing plans for public improvements along Eden, Brookside and intersections. 6 Develop a Climate Action Plan for the City. Engineering Q4 2021 IN PROGRESS 05/06/2021 Hired consultant to assist with CAP development. Survey out to public, engagement with students starting, and CAP project team of 23 assembled with staff, residents, and businesses. 7 Complete study of expanding public parking at 44th and France and explore a strategy to create district parking in the 44th and France Area per the 44th and France Small Area Plan, including parameters that balance current transportation needs and sustainability goals. Community Development/ Finance Q4 2021 IN PROGRESS 05/13/2021 Initial meetings with property owners held in 2020. Key owners focused on pandemic recovery and unable to focus on this in 2020. Owners interested, as long as it doesn’t cost them. Discussions to continue in 2021. 8 Develop Travel Demand Management Policy. Engineering Q4 2020 COMPLETE Approved by Council April 2021. 9 Prepare a District Plan for the Cahill Industrial Park by Q4 2021. Community Development Q4 2021 IN PROGRESS 05/13/2021 Moved to 2021-22. Project to begin late summer of 2021. 10 Work with Edina School District to develop and implement Safe Routes to Schools program. Engineering Q1 2020 PUBLISHED May 18, 2021 Page 9 of 10 2020 – 2021 Budget Work Plan Update ON HOLD 05/06/2021 Indefinity on hold with COVID-19 Pandemic and as School District group focused on busing instead until further notice. MnDOT grant program study complete at Cornelia, Highlands and Creek Valley Elementary Schools. Goal 4: Foster Inclusive and Engaged Community It is important that the City helps to foster a community that is welcoming and inclusive to all who live, work and spend time in Edina. The City wants to ensure that it works for all of the community. Efforts to engage the community will utilize multiple platforms, be informative, transparent, responsive and involve volunteers and City Commissions. ONGOING OBJECTIVES • Ensure City policies and practices do not have disparate impacts based on race, color, national origin, creed, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender expression, familial status or disability. • Conduct clear and meaningful community engagement where: o The decision to be made and decision-making process is clearly defined. o Individuals understand how and when they can participate. o The City communicates what feedback is used and why. o Inclusive engagement methods provide a variety of ways for the public to participate in the decision-making process and ensure all voices are heard. o Residents are satisfied with the process, even if they disagree with the outcome. 2020-2021 BUDGET OBJECTIVES • Increase participation in Better Together Edina online engagement website. • Implement racial equity measures to provide accountability of work. • Strengthen leadership and support for city-wide racial equity work. • Better leverage Boards and Commissions. • Reduce barriers to public participation. • Increase diversity of boards, commissions, task forces and staff. 2020-2021 Strategy/Action Dept Lead Target 1 Continue implementation of Racial Equity Implementation Plan and provide quarterly reports to City Council and HRRC. Administration Q4 2020 COMPLETE 05/03/2021 Race & Equity Work Plan progress will be provided to HRRC quarterly, which aligns with timeline to City Council. 2 Continue to evaluate and further refine community engagement standards and protocols based on IAP2 model. Administration Q4 2020 PUBLISHED May 18, 2021 Page 10 of 10 2020 – 2021 Budget Work Plan Update COMPLETE 05/03/2021 Promo video done, BTE updates done. Will continue to refine. 3 Develop measurable city-wide/department racial equity goals and incorporate racial equity tools and resources into decision-making processes. Administration Q1 2021 IN PROGRESS 05/03/2021 Staff members have created work plan tools and provided tools and to ELT for 2021 work plan development 4 Strengthen leadership and support for city-wide racial equity work, including providing additional training, tools and resources to embed an equity framework to City processes, services and decisions. This strategy will build upon all employee and leadership training conducted in 2018-2019. • Develop and implement racial equity leadership training, resources and support for City Council. (Q1 2020). • Conduct advanced racial equity training for staff leadership and foundational training for all employees. (Q2 2020). • Incorporate employee selected racial equity competency in annual performance review. Administration Q3 2020 IN PROGRESS 05/12/2021 Racial equity training for full time staff rolled out February 2021, 100 full-time employees have gone through training. Racial equity goals are included in staff performance reviews. Still need to work with HR to review ERP system capabilities to incorporate competencies in performance reviews going forward. 5 Develop and implement a plan to increase diversity of boards and commissions members. Administration Q3 2020 IN PROGRESS 05/11/2021 Framework & measurables has been outlined. Race and Equity & Engagement Coordinator will provide proposal in Fall 2021. City of Edina – Q1 2021 General Fund • Fines and Forfeitures – Pre-pandemic, court fines averaged $80k/month. Currently, average $30k/month due to decreased traffic stops. • Investment Income – Investment income is recorded in this account throughout the year and allocated out to other funds at year end. Negative income is driven by unrealized loss on investments. At year end 2020, recorded an unallocated unrealized gain of $878k. Unrealized gain/loss is part of assigned fund balance. • Property Taxes – Property taxes are the primary revenue source and are received in June and December. • Franchise Fees – Similar to Q1 2020. Payments are recorded quarterly but lag the quarter close. • Licenses & Permits - Building permit revenue fluctuates based on the number of permits and valuation year- over-year. Q1 2021 has 849 permits issued with valuation of $71M vs Q1 2020 of 470 permits with valuation of $104M. • Intergovernmental – Increase in 2020 was due to $3.9M of CARES Act funding. • Building Rental – Driven by payment timing of cell tower contracts. • Expenses – Expenses generally fall 25% each quarter. Departments have continued to manage their budgets minimizing expenses during the pandemic. • Contributions & Transfers – In 2020, a $3M budget stabilization transfer was made from the Construction fund. Budget stabilization is $4.3M total in General Fund assigned fund balance. YTD 2021 Budget 2021 FY 2020 % of Budget Revenue Fines and Forfeit 77,888 950,000 485,472 8% Invmnt Inc - Non Op (476,567) 150,000 597,073 -318% Other Revenue 34,107 17,900 121,242 191% Property Taxes - 33,986,471 31,901,483 0% Franchise Fee 360 850,000 811,004 0% Lodging Tax 942 27,000 8,313 3% Licenses & Permits 1,413,986 5,179,514 6,381,890 27% Intergovernmental 332,774 1,753,218 5,976,629 19% Charges for Services 1,194,694 5,434,930 4,812,578 22% Building Rental 266,292 458,800 479,149 58% Other Fees (7) - (88) - Total Revenues 2,844,468 48,807,833 51,574,745 6% Expenses Salaries (4,604,673) (24,741,834) (23,450,784) 19% Benefits (1,689,214) (9,521,863) (9,258,625) 18% Contractual Services (1,339,860) (7,183,342) (6,471,324) 19% Commodities (360,718) (2,588,433) (2,351,412) 14% Capital Outlay - - (75,047) - Internal Services (1,212,772) (4,850,496) (4,442,939) 25% Total Expenses (9,207,237) (48,885,968) (46,050,132) 19% Net Operating Inc/Loss (6,362,769) (78,135) 5,524,612 Non-Operating Rev/Exp Sale of Property 4,790 - 75 - Misc - Non Op 614 - 11,503 - Contrib & Transfers 25,706 50,000 3,115,260 51% Total Non-Operating Rev/Exp 31,111 50,000 3,126,839 62% Net Inc/(Loss)(6,331,659) (28,135) 8,651,451 Parks & Recreation Enterprises The City closed facilities on March 18th last year due to COVID-19. Thus, the enterprises had a mostly unimpacted first quarter in 2020. Following are additional revenue losses for the first quarter 2021: Newly released guidelines allowing more capacity allow us to move toward normal operations. Cost recovery percentages indicate a facility’s ability to cover operating expenses. Currently, those facilities with less than 100% cost recovery are subsidized by transfers from the liquor fund and/or existing cash balances at the facilities. The City calculates cost recovery two ways: • Total Cost Recovery – Operating revenue divided by operating expenses. Non-operating revenue/expense items (e.g., donations, investment income, etc.) are excluded from both calculations. • Management Cost Recovery – This calculation starts with the Total Cost Recovery calculation but excludes internal services, depreciation and water/sewer/storm charges from operating expense. Art Center - The Art Center closed in March 2020 due to COVID-19restrictions and remains closed offering youth and adult classes at other City facilities such as the Senior Center and Arneson Acres. While plans for the Art Center facility are in process, expectation is for the Art Center to operate in this current off-site capacity for the majority of 2021. YTD 2021 Budget 2021 FY 2020 % of Budget Revenue Charges for Services - 26,725 3,312 0% Sales - 18,706 5,297 0% Memberships - 15,664 3,369 0% Admissions 35,415 422,070 29,637 8% Other Fees - 19,769 - 0% Sales - Utilities - - 956 - Total Revenues 35,415 502,934 42,570 7% Expenses Cost of Sales & Srvc - (500) (1,063) 0% Salaries (24,843) (468,749) (186,265) 5% Benefits (4,500) (110,640) (23,904) 4% Contractual Services (7,680) (109,545) (38,573) 7% Commodities (2,730) (76,500) (10,969) 4% Internal Services (18,959) (75,838) (68,862) 25% Depreciation (1,500) (6,000) (5,891) 25% Total Expenses (60,212) (847,772) (335,526) 7% Net Operating Inc/Loss (24,797) (344,838) (292,956) Non-Operating Rev/Exp Invmnt Inc - Non Op - - (36) - Donations - Non Op 10,000 10,000 13,714 100% Contrib & Transfers - 250,000 125,000 0% Total Non-Operating Rev/Exp 10,000 260,000 138,678 4% Net Inc/(Loss)(14,797) (84,838) (154,277) Total Cost Recovery 59% 59% 13% Management Cost Recovery 89% 66% 16% Art Center, $58,618 Arena, $108,491 Braemar Field, $97,036 Edinborough Park, $242,970 Centennial Lakes, $28,964 Braemar Golf Course & Dome • Golf Course opened March 30th this year with normal operations. A new website and reservation software system were implemented to promote and continue online reservations of tee times. • Golf Dome closed April 30th with a successful season even under COVID-19 capacity limits. Golf Dome switched to timed golf during COVID-19 with no buckets sold. Timed golf transactions, representing a mix of 1/2 hour times, increased from 18,130 for the whole year 2020 to 30,578 for first quarter of 2021. • Green Fees – Q1 greens fees represent lessons. YTD 2021 Budget 2021 FY 2020 % of Budget Revenue Charges for Services - - 179 - Sales 17,815 252,364 181,334 7% Memberships 78,660 128,459 128,506 61% Admissions 755,772 500,000 641,443 151% Building Rental 20,154 190,000 40,147 11% Equipment Rental 180 397,940 284,148 0% Greens Fees 230,025 2,572,909 2,663,755 9% Other Fees 2,385 2,584 8,170 92% Total Revenues 1,104,989 4,044,256 3,947,682 27% Expenses Cost of Sales & Srvc (19,149) (129,706) (143,578) 15% Salaries (252,186) (1,296,201) (1,462,597) 19% Benefits (68,731) (375,251) (305,201) 18% Contractual Services (153,882) (465,450) (648,895) 33% Commodities (50,622) (274,000) (354,575) 18% Internal Services (60,582) (242,329) (220,690) 25% Depreciation (221,100) (965,000) (893,541) 23% Total Expenses (826,251) (3,747,937) (4,029,078) 22% Net Operating Inc/Loss 278,738 296,319 (81,396) Non-Operating Rev/Exp Invmnt Inc - Non Op - 15,000 27,988 0% Misc - Non Op - - 20,848 - Intergovernmental - - 3,108 - Int & Fiscal Charges (143,679) (227,152) (241,242) 63% Contrib & Transfers 12,490 - 48,954 - Total Non-Operating Rev/Exp (131,189) (212,152) (140,343) 62% Net Inc/(Loss)147,549 84,167 (221,739) Total Cost Recovery 134% 108% 98% Management Cost Recovery 208% 159% 138% Aquatic Center - Closed for 2020 season and expect to open for 2021 season. COVID-19 outdoor guidelines are still pending; staff are reviewing several options for accommodating capacity limitations and distancing requirements. Season pass revenue generally starts in April, but 2021 sales continue to be slow. YTD 2021 Budget 2021 FY 2020 % of Budget Revenue Charges for Services - 6,050 78 0% Sales - 121,000 - 0% Memberships 58,292 440,000 (3,687) 13% Admissions - 411,125 - 0% Building Rental - 62,700 83 0% Greens Fees - - (110) - Total Revenues 58,292 1,040,875 (3,637) 6% Expenses Cost of Sales & Srvc - (49,474) - 0% Salaries (6,336) (389,230) (8,751) 2% Benefits (2,414) (75,248) (2,750) 3% Contractual Services (8,909) (217,768) (35,202) 4% Commodities (910) (77,100) (5,092) 1% Internal Services (11,070) (44,281) (39,236) 25% Depreciation (71,124) (284,500) (280,519) 25% Total Expenses (100,763) (1,137,601) (371,550) 9% Net Operating Inc/Loss (42,470) (96,726) (375,186) Non-Operating Rev/Exp Invmnt Inc - Non Op - 26,000 61,480 0% Int & Fiscal Charges (12,300) (11,209) (13,822) 110% Contrib & Transfers 1,264 - 143,999 - Total Non-Operating Rev/Exp (11,036) 14,791 191,656 -75% Net Inc/(Loss)(53,507) (81,935) (183,530) Total Cost Recovery 58% 91% -1% Management Cost Recovery 337% 129% -8% Edinborough Park - Adventure Peak and the Great Hall have slowly re-opened to visitors utilizing an online reservation system and timed sessions adhering to COVID-19 guidelines. The pool and track continue to be open to users via an online registration system. YTD 2021 Budget 2021 FY 2020 % of Budget Revenue Lodging Tax 258 - 1,751 - Charges for Services 24 10,000 831 0% Sales 30 144,342 33,397 0% Memberships 11,020 131,738 35,687 8% Admissions 10,684 678,636 173,183 2% Building Rental 10,082 228,603 81,317 4% Greens Fees - 1,500 (60) 0% Other Fees 57,021 208,000 180,888 27% Total Revenues 89,120 1,402,819 506,994 6% Expenses Cost of Sales & Srvc - (81,618) (18,649) 0% Salaries (102,029) (648,905) (502,637) 16% Benefits (36,507) (226,076) (156,387) 16% Contractual Services (56,110) (384,380) (266,326) 15% Commodities (33,844) (144,700) (102,160) 23% Internal Services (36,208) (144,833) (131,851) 25% Depreciation (30,141) (145,500) (102,580) 21% Total Expenses (294,839) (1,776,012) (1,280,589) 17% Net Operating Inc/Loss (205,720) (373,193) (773,594) Non-Operating Rev/Exp Gain/Loss on Asset - - 1,311 - Invmnt Inc - Non Op - 27,000 48,202 0% Misc - Non Op - - 447 - Contrib & Transfers 2,312 - 10,329 - Total Non-Operating Rev/Exp 2,312 27,000 60,289 9% Net Inc/(Loss)(203,408) (346,193) (713,306) Total Cost Recovery 30% 79% 40% Management Cost Recovery 39% 94% 49% Braemar Arena – The arena was open for practices, games and tournaments with COVID-19 protocols for capacity and distancing. Drop-in programs were conducted with a reservation sign-up system. The Learn to Skate program was in session with COVID-19 protocols. Concessions remained closed. YTD 2021 Budget 2021 FY 2020 % of Budget Revenue Charges for Services 10,254 55,464 62,666 18% Sales 262 317,672 86,070 0% Admissions 42,171 250,787 38,111 17% Building Rental 373,255 1,926,810 1,445,576 19% Equipment Rental - 6,209 3,567 0% Other Fees (20) - 147 - Total Revenues 425,922 2,556,942 1,636,136 17% Expenses Cost of Sales & Srvc - (114,591) (29,546) 0% Salaries (161,286) (850,695) (676,536) 19% Benefits (41,022) (235,536) (182,288) 17% Contractual Services (175,972) (983,521) (963,406) 18% Commodities (23,266) (106,112) (99,182) 22% Internal Services (53,180) (212,718) (192,950) 25% Depreciation (166,251) (665,000) (665,072) 25% Total Expenses (620,976) (3,168,173) (2,808,979) 20% Net Operating Inc/Loss (195,054) (611,231) (1,172,843) Non-Operating Rev/Exp Invmnt Inc - Non Op - 7,000 8,858 0% Misc - Non Op - - 1,873 - Int & Fiscal Charges (39,327) (73,242) (77,421) 54% Contrib & Transfers 10,053 300,000 338,772 3% Total Non-Operating Rev/Exp (29,274) 233,758 272,083 -13% Net Inc/(Loss)(224,328) (377,473) (900,760) Total Cost Recovery 69% 81% 58% Management Cost Recovery 109% 112% 86% Braemar Field – Operated normally with COVID-19 protocols and capacity limits in place for users of the facility. Drop-in programs utilized an online reservation system. YTD 2021 Budget 2021 FY 2020 % of Budget Revenue Charges for Services - 1,000 54 0% Admissions (314) 23,646 51,282 -1% Building Rental 96,483 447,523 297,862 22% Total Revenues 96,169 472,169 349,198 20% Expenses Salaries (25,879) (133,960) (76,912) 19% Benefits (4,513) (39,868) (14,510) 11% Contractual Services (41,458) (190,900) (73,680) 22% Commodities (1,153) (22,000) (15,936) 5% Internal Services (8,930) (35,719) (32,622) 25% Depreciation (129,000) (516,000) (513,080) 25% Total Expenses (210,933) (938,447) (726,741) 22% Net Operating Inc/Loss (114,764) (466,278) (377,542) Non-Operating Rev/Exp Invmnt Inc - Non Op - 14,000 32,738 0% Contrib & Transfers 156 - 951 - Total Non-Operating Rev/Exp 156 14,000 33,689 1% Net Inc/(Loss)(114,608) (452,278) (343,853) Total Cost Recovery 46% 50% 48% Management Cost Recovery 132% 122% 194% Centennial Lakes Park • Winter skating occurred with limited outdoor seating. The Hughes Pavilion and concessions remained closed for the winter season. • Other Fees for Centennial Lakes Park is mostly comprised of park maintenance fees to surrounding properties. YTD 2021 Budget 2021 FY 2020 % of Budget Revenue Charges for Services - - 62 - Sales - 24,598 11,102 0% Admissions 585 - 1,633 - Building Rental 3,100 85,814 (3,278) 4% Equipment Rental - 129,196 67,747 0% Greens Fees - 235,423 163,129 0% Other Fees 120,453 354,000 359,900 34% Total Revenues 124,138 829,031 600,294 15% Expenses Cost of Sales & Srvc - (9,795) (5,455) 0% Salaries (86,040) (556,697) (516,938) 15% Benefits (27,632) (182,821) (146,389) 15% Contractual Services (17,665) (200,888) (190,415) 9% Commodities (21,483) (126,200) (88,340) 17% Internal Services (28,264) (113,057) (102,769) 25% Depreciation (9,126) (92,000) (39,064) 10% Total Expenses (190,210) (1,281,458) (1,089,370) 15% Net Operating Inc/Loss (66,072) (452,427) (489,076) Non-Operating Rev/Exp Invmnt Inc - Non Op - - 17,240 - Donations - Non Op 2,200 - 13,000 - Misc - Non Op - - 757 - Intergovernmental - - 16,754 - Contrib & Transfers 4,969 100,000 68,936 5% Total Non-Operating Rev/Exp 7,169 100,000 116,687 7% Net Inc/(Loss)(58,903) (352,427) (372,389) Total Cost Recovery 65% 65% 55% Management Cost Recovery 84% 77% 68% Liquor Fund • Revenue is up $285k vs 2020 and $300k vs 2019. Ecom sales remain constant for Q1 at $279k for 2021 vs $273k 2020. YTD 2021 Budget 2021 FY 2020 % of Budget Revenue Sales 3,124,081 14,076,681 12,123,739 22% Other Fees 990 - (6,326) - Total Revenues 3,125,071 14,076,681 12,117,413 22% Expenses Cost of Sales & Srvc (2,259,045) (9,833,185) (8,744,416) 23% Salaries (307,214) (1,422,203) (1,436,136) 22% Benefits (77,742) (433,649) (341,075) 18% Contractual Services (162,701) (650,603) (553,440) 25% Commodities (16,352) (55,050) (43,548) 30% Internal Services (78,181) (312,725) (289,551) 25% Depreciation (27,081) (96,500) (113,853) 28% Total Expenses (2,928,317) (12,803,915) (11,522,019) 23% Net Operating Inc/Loss 196,754 1,272,766 595,394 Non-Operating Rev/Exp Invmnt Inc - Non Op - 31,000 59,180 0% Contrib & Transfers 979 (850,000) (596,774) 0% Total Non-Operating Rev/Exp 979 (819,000) (537,594) 0% Net Inc/(Loss)197,734 453,766 57,801 • Customer count for the first quarter is 90k for 2021, 91k in 2020 and 105k in 2019. The average transaction value is coming down to $37/transaction from the pandemic high of $68/transaction, but still higher than Q1 2019 of $30/transaction. $- $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 $80 - 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Q1 18 Q2 18 Q3 18 Q4 18 Q1 19 Q2 19 Q3 19 Q4 19 Q1 20 Q2 20 Q3 20 Q4 20 Q1 21 Average Transaction Value (ATV)Customer Count (in 000's)Customer Count by Store & Total ATV 50th Southdale Grandview ATV • Point of sale (POS) margins were impacted at the beginning of the pandemic but have been rebounding. 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Q1 19 Q2 19 Q3 19 Q4 19 Q1 20 Q2 20 Q3 20 Q4 20 Q1 21 POS Gross Margin MN Muni off-sale Spirits Beer Wine Total Utility Fund • Water and sewer revenues are down 7% vs Q1 2020 due to allocation between 2020 and 2021. For example, February billing represents water usage for November-January. January’s portion is allocated to 2021. • WAC/SAC Fees are dependent upon permits and is budgeted conservatively. WAC/SAC fees are trailing Q1 2020 by $200k. • Intergovernmental – 2020 included $396k for the SCORE grant ($70k recycling/$326 organics). The recycling portion has been extended to 2021. YTD 2021 Budget 2021 FY 2020 % of Budget Revenue Other Revenue 990 - 7,590 - Charges for Services (1,840) - 3,585 - Water Charges 1,255,916 8,528,921 7,768,135 15% Water Meters 17,406 53,247 45,351 33% Water Penalty 18,955 72,147 16,607 26% Sewer Penalty 19,393 47,740 28,176 41% State Health Charges 33,864 96,638 132,814 35% Regular Recycling Charges 383,001 1,508,626 1,147,479 25% Sewer Charges 2,297,254 10,751,618 9,842,105 21% Storm Sewer Charges 1,238,216 5,345,238 4,742,003 23% Water Rec Fee 417,245 694,737 1,233,698 98% Sewer Rec Fee 255,306 425,283 752,130 1964% Certification Fee - 13,000 12,215 - Total Revenues 5,935,706 27,537,195 25,731,887 22% Expenses Salaries (334,498) (2,210,004) (1,797,502) 15% Benefits (119,082) (833,654) (646,159) 14% Contractual Services (2,720,757) (9,647,622) (10,935,137) 28% Commodities (157,660) (1,177,100) (961,379) 13% Internal Services (346,839) (1,387,235) (1,335,322) 25% Depreciation (1,491,261) (5,696,000) (5,725,848) - Total Expenses (5,170,097) (20,951,615) (21,401,348) 25% Net Operating Inc/Loss 765,609 6,585,580 4,330,538 Non-Operating Rev/Exp Gain/Loss on Asset - - 6,048 - Invmnt Inc - Non Op 591 324,120 689,931 0% Misc - Non Op 240 25,000 24,873 1% Intergovernmental - 60,000 420,189 0% Int & Fiscal Charges (627,306) (788,736) (712,997) 80% Contrib & Transfers (57,929) (100,000) (424,002) 58% Total Non-Operating Rev/Exp (684,404) (479,616) 4,042 143% Net Inc/(Loss)81,205 6,105,964 4,334,580 Investments The City of Edina (CoE) investments are held in various accounts: Muni Bonds – The City owns the 2021 through 2028 maturities of the $1.265M Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2009A. Other • Tradition - one year $245,000 FDIC insured Certificate of Deposit held at Tradition Capital Bank. • 4M - Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund sponsored by the League of Minnesota Cities. The City uses this fund to manage bond proceeds to ensure compliance with IRS regulations. Funds from the 2019A are included in this account. These bonds were issued to fund road reconstruction projects. As construction continues, the balance in this account will decrease. • Crown – one year $245,000 FDIC insured Certificate of Deposit held at Crown Bank. Investment Sweep – Funds not required to clear checks in the City’s checking account are automatically “swept” into this account and invested in commercial paper. The balance in this account changes daily based on the amount of checks outstanding. Securian – Securian is the City’s outside investment manager, replacing Nuveen in January 2018. They oversee a $40M portfolio. These securities are held in a custodian account at U.S. Bank. Funds in this account are not needed for cash flow and can be invested in longer maturities. The benchmark for this portfolio is a combination of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Intermediate Government Bond Index and the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Mortgage-Backed Securities Index. Allowable investments include U.S. Treasuries and Agencies up to, but not including, 10 years and agency mortgage-backed pass-through securities guaranteed by Ginnie Mae (GNMA), Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Freddie Mac (FHLMC). City of Edina – This account is managed internally. The balance in this account at the end of Q1 was $50M. The City uses a network of three institutional brokers who recommend securities in compliance with our investment policy. Funds in this account are managed primarily for cash flow purposes and annual debt service payments. 2023B – This account was created to house investment of bond proceeds at U.S. Bank. Q1 balance is $5.1M. The following is a breakdown of total investments by custodian as of 3/31/21: The following represents the total investment pool by security type: Following represents the same data but only for the internally managed piece under custodianship of U.S. Bank: The following are yields for current investments against a similar benchmark. The internal and external portfolios have different investment strategies. Internal - The internal portfolio is intended to remain sufficiently liquid to enable the City to manage daily City cash flow as well as make debt payments. The average days to maturity for the internal portfolio is approximately one year (including the money market account). Maturities range from one day (money market) to five years. The internal return has outpaced the internal benchmark due to holding investments purchased when rates were higher, to the extent the investments were not callable. External - The external portfolio has longer term investment options to optimize return within our investment policy. The external portfolio benchmark of Bloomberg Barclays Intermediate U.S. Government/Mortgage Index represents an investment pool including U.S. Treasuries and Agencies up to, but not including, 10 years and agency mortgage-backed pass-through securities guaranteed by Ginnie Mae (GNMA), Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Freddie Mac (FHLMC). The average days to maturity for the external portfolio is ten years with maturities ranging from one month to 30 years. The later maturities represent mortgage-backed securities. Account/Index Trailing Month Total Return, Net of Fees Trailing 3 Months Total Return, Net of Fees Trailing 6 Months Total Return, Net of Fees Trailing 12 Months Total Return, Net of Fees City of Edina 0.024% 0.097% 0.230% 1.278% ICE BofA 0-1 Year US Treasury Notes & Bonds 0.010% 0.060% 0.082% 0.144% CoE - Securian AM -0.383% -1.310% -1.243% -0.290% Bloomberg Barclays Intermediate U.S. Government/Mortgage Index -0.592% -1.411% -1.397% -0.645% **Detail reports by investment are available upon request** Date: May 18, 2021 Agenda Item #: XIII. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Calendar of City Council Meetings and Events Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None; information only. INTRODUCTION: Date Time Meeting/Event Location Tues, May 18 5:30 p.m.Commissions: Parks & Recreation / Arts & Culture Virtual 7:00 p.m.City Council Regular Meeting T hurs, May 27 7:30 a.m.Housing and Redevelopment Authority Virtual Mon, May 31 MEMORIAL DAY – CITY HALL CLOSED Tues, Jun. 1 5:30 p.m.Quality of Life Survey / Street Reconstruction Virtual 7:00 p.m.City Council Regular Meeting T hurs, Jun. 10 7:30 a.m.Housing and Redevelopment Authority Virtual Tues, Jun. 15 5:30 p.m.Climate Action Plan / Environment & Energy Commission Virtual 7:00 p.m.City Council Regular Meeting T hurs, Jun. 24 7:30 a.m.Housing and Redevelopment Authority Virtual