Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-12-30 Planning Commission Regular Meeting MinutesMINUTE SUMMARY MEETING OF THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 30, 2008, 7:00 PM EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 4801 WEST 50TH STREET MEMBERS PRESENT: Risser, Scherer, Staunton, Schroeder, Fischer, Grabiel, Forrest, Schnettler, Lonsbury MEMBER ABSENT: Brown STAFF PRESENT: Cary Teague and Jackie Hoogenakker I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTE SUMMARY: The minutes of the November 26, 2008, meeting were filed as submitted. II. NEW BUSINESS: 2008.0012.08 Overall Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning YMCA 7355 York Avenue South, Edina Presentation by Planner Planner Teague reminded the Commission that this item was tabled at the October 1, 2008 Planning Commission meeting, in order for the applicant to address concerns raised by the Planning Commission. Planner Teague reported that among the issues raised, were concerns regarding the site plan, adding the applicant has submitted revised plans to attempt to address those issues to included the elimination of the parking stalls along Xerxes Avenue, which previously required a setback variance, a revised landscape plan to address the streetscape issue in front of the building, and the addition of green space in the rear parking lot. 1 Planner Teague noted an additional concern was raised in regard to police calls generated from the townhomes to the south. The police department has provided a listing of all calls received since 2002. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Quasi-Public to Mixed Use, and Preliminary Rezoning from R-1, Single-Dwelling Unit District to Mixed Development District 5. (MDD-5.) Approval would authorize the applicant to apply for an Overall/Final Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit & Variances. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The guide plan change is consistent with the adjacent land uses. 2. The apartments are consistent with the multiple family housing developments to the south and west. 3. The guide plan change would be consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. 4. The City would benefit from a new and improved YMCA facility, and the site would continue with a use consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan designation of Quasi-Public. 5. The affordable housing component would assist in meeting the City's goal of 212 affordable housing units by 2030. 6. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated August 29, 2008 & December 5, 2008. 2. Sustainable design. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative on pages All of the staff report. 3. Trail and sidewalk connections must be included as demonstrated on the preliminary plans. 4. All traffic mitigation measures as required by the Transportation Commission and traffic study must be followed. 5. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. 6. The temporary parking lot on the park property must be paved and meet all minimum requirements of the city engineer. 7. The temporary parking lot shall be reviewed by the City Park Board during the Final Development Plan process. The applicant would be responsible to construct the temporary lot and restore the park back to its original condition at their cost. 8. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated September 24, 2008. 2 Appearing for the Applicant Steve Dorgan, Cresa Partners, Greg Fenton, BWB, Rachel Robinson, CommonBond Communities, Steve Korngable, MS Society Applicant Presentation Mr. Dorgan addressed the Commission and stated YMCA is very excited about this proposal and has met with neighbors. Mr. Dorgan introduced, Greg Fenton, BWB Architects to give a brief overview of the project. Mr. Fenton gave a brief presentation explaining that the slightly larger YMCA footprint actually affords more program space with flexibility. Mr. Fenton explained the new building is located on the front of the site to allow the current facility to continue to remain open during construction. The close proximity to York Avenue also gives the building a more urban feel while enhancing the pedestrian experience along York Avenue. Mr. Fenton pointed out the new Y has also been designed with a lot of windows to bring in more light and help reduce building mass. The point of entry is on the east elevation and visitors from the sidewalk along York Avenue won't have to pass through a parking lot, as they do now to gain access to the building. Concluding, Mr. Fenton said it is critical for the operation that the YMCA provides a single access point. This is very important for security reasons. Rachel Robinson addressed the Commission and reported CommonBond owns and manages South Haven, Yorktown Townhomes and Summit Point, all residences in Edina and for this project has partnered with the MS Society. Ms. Robinson added that all people with disabilities, and the general public, not only those with MS are welcome. Continuing, Ms. Robinson said all units will be designed and built with Universal Design principles with one, two, and three bedroom units, 80% affordable and 20% market rate. Commission Comments & Questions Commissioner Grabiel questioned if the proposal as presented would impact the neighboring skate park. Planner Teague responded that there would be temporary parking over park property and when the project is completed the park would return to its original state. Commissioner Staunton asked what this parcel of land is guided for under the new Comprehensive Plan. Planner Teague responded that the site is guided for Quasi-Public, and no other changes. Commissioners also raised the following questions with regard to the housing element of the project: 3 • Are 50% of the units mandated for those with disabilities and who sets the ratio • Are buildings constructed with "Universal Design principles" attractive to the general public • How are the units earmarked for those with disabilities? Is it on a first come first served basis? • Referring to Edina Police reports how would CommonBond address crime-related issues. In response to Commission questions and comments Ms. Robinson explained that CommonBond abides by the Fair Housing Laws and the goal of CommonBond is to have at least 50% of the units rented to individuals or families with disabilities. Ms. Robinson added CommonBond is not limited to renting 50% of the units to people with disabilities, it can be higher. Continuing, Ms. Robinson said that Universal Designed buildings greatly appeal to the general public because of the open floor plans. With regard to those with disabilities those units would also be accessible units and there is an application process (for all) that includes income verification, credit history, rental history, and criminal background checks. Concluding, Ms. Robinson responded that CommonBond has a very good relationship with the Edina Police Department and is proactive in ensuring that its residents live in a safe and secure environment. Ms. Robinson reported all CommonBond properties have full time managers and reiterated all residents are screened. Ms. Robinson said if there is a problem with any of the residents we get the "wrong" ones out. Concluding, Ms. Robinson stated the building would feature a security system including security cameras and entry code pads. Public Comment Chair Lonsbury re-opened the public hearing. Dan Adkins, 7430 Xerxes Avenue, questioned where the apartment residents would park, especially for quick stops at home. Mr. Adkins stated he hopes if parking isn't adequate that over-flow parking doesn't spill onto Xerxes Avenue. Mr. Adkins suggested that security cameras be located in the parking ramp area. Concluding, Mr. Adkins reiterated his concern is with possible parking on Xerxes Avenue and the potential for increased traffic on Xerxes Avenue. Nina Holiday-Lynch, 4360 Brookside Court, addressed the Commission and told them she completely supports the project, adding it is very important for a community to provide affordable housing. Ms. Holiday-Lynch pointed out the proposed apartment is in the best possible location because of its close proximity to mass transit lines and places of employment. 4 Mr. Olson, 7457 York Avenue, told the Commission living in the Yorkdale Townhomes has been a blessing for him and his family. He explained living in affordable housing so close to mass transit, and places to work for him and his partner (Target and Macy's) have allowed him to finish school. Mr. Olson said he feels very safe living in Edina and his kids feel safe. Concluding, Mr. Olson asked the Commission to support the project as presented. Tim Brausen, representing Isaiah, an ecumenical organization, stated he believes this is a great opportunity for Edina to provide affordable housing. He stressed the location is ideal. Continuing, Mr. Brausen said his experience with CommonBond has been positive, adding CommonBond is an organization that provides great, well built, and well managed buildings providing affordable housing throughout the City and State. Steve Korngable, MS Society, told the Commission the MS Society has an excellent relationship with CommonBond. At present over 200 people with MS are on a waiting list for a good safe place to live. Mr. Korngable said for those with MS the waiting list for an accessible home is two years. Concluding, Mr. Korngable asked the Commission to approve this request, adding how important it is for those with MS to have easy access to water exercises, and other forms of exercise. Mr. Dennis Guiney, 5924 Olinger Blvd., stated he has been an Edina resident since 1972 and believes there is great value in living in Edina, adding it's a wonderful place to live and raise a family. Mr. Guiney said he would be very proud of Edina if this project were approved. It's a great opportunity to provide others the opportunity to live in Edina. Concluding, Mr. Guiney asked the Commission to approve the proposal as presented. Continued Commission Discussion Commissioners raised the following issues with regard to the YMCA building: • Parking • "No front door" on York Avenue to access the new YMCA building • Secured access point and interior circulation of the YMCA building • Setback hardship Commissioners clarified that there are 130 enclosed parking spaces (housing) and 435 surface parking spaces. Planner Teague indicated the YMCA has agreed to enter into a Proof of Parking agreement to construct an additional parking deck if the need arose. A discussion continued with regard to how the new YMCA addresses York Avenue. Commissioners felt more could be done to create a more pedestrian friendly exposure to York Avenue. It was pointed out that the height "cap" east of 5 York Avenue does create some design challenges; however, creating a pedestrian friendly atmosphere is important and a goal identified by the City. Discussion also focused on the variances needed for the preliminary development plan and hardship with Commissioners acknowledging that the YMCA remaining open could be viewed as a self imposed hardship; however, the YMCA is a community resource that is unique in itself. Discussion also focused on if the MDD-5 zoning designation is right for this project; however, it was acknowledged that the present R-1 zoning of the site and the present use of the site as a community based resource is difficult to address and find the right formula, it's so unique. The setback requirements for the MDD-5 district also poise a problem for the site, acknowledging MDD-5 requires a smaller tract, greater setbacks, versus MDD-6 with lesser setbacks and larger tract. It was also pointed out that rezoning the site to a PCD-3 zoning classification would open up the project for retail. Discussion continued on splitting the motion to better address each request. Chair Lonsbury clarified that this request will be heard again by the Commission, adding both preliminary rezoning and preliminary development plan approval require another hearing before the Commission. Chair Lonsbury also noted the requested variances also require a hearing before the Edina Zoning Board of Appeals at one of their regularly scheduled meetings. Commission Action Commissioner Fischer moved to recommend that the City Council approve the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Quasi-Public to Mixed Use, and Preliminary Rezoning from R-1, Single-Dwelling Unit District to Mixed Development District 5. (MDD-5.) Approval would authorize the applicant to apply for an Overall/Final Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit & Variances. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The guide plan change is consistent with the adjacent land uses. 2. The apartments are consistent with the multiple family housing developments to the south and west. 3. The guide plan change would be consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. 4. The City would benefit from a new and improved YMCA facility, and the site would continue with a use consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan designation of Quasi-Public. 5. The affordable housing component would assist in meeting the City's goal of 212 affordable housing units by 2030. 6. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. Approval is also subject to the following Conditions: 6 1. The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated August 29, 2008 & December 5, 2008. 2. Sustainable design. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative on pages All of the staff report. 3. Trail and sidewalk connections must be included as demonstrated on the preliminary plans. 4. All traffic mitigation measures as required by the Transportation Commission and traffic study must be followed. 5. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. 6. The temporary parking lot on the park property must be paved and meet all minimum requirements of the city engineer. 7. The temporary parking lot shall be reviewed by the City Park Board during the Final Development Plan process. The applicant would be responsible to construct the temporary lot and restore the park back to its original condition at their cost. 8. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated September 24, 2008. Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion. Commissioner Grabiel pointed out that the City has gone to great lengths in requiring past applicants proposing housing developments to provide affordable housing units in their projects. Commissioner Grabiel pointed out this project offers affordable housing which should be positively viewed and which is something the City has encouraged in the past. Commissioner Grabiel moved to recommend Preliminary Development Plan Approval including variances based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Risser seconded the motion. Commissioner Schroeder offered an amendment to the motion suggesting that the building design be modified to address York Avenue to meet the spirit of the ordinance that encourages a project to create a more active pedestrian involvement. Commissioners Grabiel and Risser accepted Commissioner Schroeder's amendment. Commissioner Scherer strongly encouraged the applicant to modify their design to better address the buildings access point by making it more visible to pedestrians. Commissioner Grabiel pointed out that the entrance to the proposed YMCA building is roughly the same distance from the sidewalk as visitors' experience today. Commissioner Grabiel also pointed out with regard to the requested 7 variances that the City recently granted variances for a housing and commercial development along 69th and York/Xerxes. Member Fischer commented that it was mentioned that the YMCA remaining open could be considered a self imposed hardship; however, in a sense the YMCA should remain open because it's an area resource which is the reason for the present R-1 zoning designation. Commissioner Fischer pointed out the uniqueness of the R-1 zoning for this site, adding the R-1 zoning of the site could be viewed as a hardship. Continuing, Commissioner Fischer said the 50' setback required could be considered out of scope and scale compared with MDD-6 zoning district. Concluding, Member Fischer also said in looking at all the details it's easy to forget that this is conceptually a good project. Chair Lonsbury called for the vote. All Commissioners voted aye. Motion carried. 2008.0007.08b Amend Final Development Plan Mohagen Hansen/Twin Cities Orthopedics 4010 65th St West/6400 France Avenue Presentation by Planner Planner Teague informed the Commission Mohagen Hansen Architectural Group, on behalf of Twin Cities Orthopedics and Southdale Fairview Hospital is requesting an amended Final Development Plan and driveway setback variances with the following changes: 1. Enlarge the drive entrance on the east side of the building to allow easier and safer turning area into the building. The proposed drive-aisle would encroach onto the property to the east, and therefore, requires a variance to the side property line. The adjacent property owner (Southdale Fairview Hospital) has agreed to the encroachment, and is a co-applicant for the same variance on their property. 2. Revised landscaping along the north lot line. Trees would be planted in the MnDot right-of-way to avoid underground utility lines. 3. Revised storm water storage system. 4. Increase in the parking ramp stair tower height by 2'2" to accommodate structural clearances. 5. Revised building material from architectural precast to brick on the fourth level. 8 Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the amended Final Development Plan at 4010 65th Street West based on the following findings: 1. The amendments do not add any finished square footage to the previously approved plans. 2. The proposed changes to the plans are minimal. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the previously approved final development plan unless modified below, the plans listed below and the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped November 26, 2008. • Grading plan date stamped November 26, 2008. • Landscaping plan date stamped November 26, 2008. • Building elevations date stamped November 26, 2008. 2. The following must be submitted to the city before the city issues a building permit: a. A final landscape plan for staff approval. b. A copy of the recorded resolution with the county. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. An executed cross access easement must be submitted prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new building. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the City engineer in his memo dated December 19, 2008. Concluding, Planner Teague stated staff also recommends that the Zoning Board of Appeals and the City Council approve drive-aisle side-yard setback variances from 10 feet to 0 feet at 4010 65th Street West and 6400 France based on the following findings: 1. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the size of the approved building on the site, the shape and limited depth of the lot, especially the western half of the site. 2. The site's high water table prevented the parking from being constructed under ground. 3. The site's location adjacent to Crosstown Highway 62. 4. The revised driveway would provide a safe and easy turning radius for delivery trucks driving into the loading area. 5. The intent of the ordinance is to provide separation and green space between lots and uses. This site is unique in that it is part of 9 the Regional Medical District, and there would be a pedestrian connection between the parking ramp for the hospital, and the new building. The appearance would be that these uses function together. Appearing for the applicant Mark Hansen, Mohagen, Hansen Architects Applicant presentation Mr. Hansen highlighted the changes that have been made to the plans, adding that in his opinion the changes to the driveway/entrance actually enhance the project. Mr. Hansen pointed out the widening of the entrance drive provides a safer entrance and turning radius. Continuing, Mr. Hansen pointed out that planting the trees on MnDot property thereby avoiding utility lines is also positive for the site. Concluding, Mr. Hansen asked the Commission for their support for the revisions to the Final Development Plan. Commission Action Commissioner Fischer moved to recommend revised Final Development Plan approval including variances based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. 10