Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2021-08-17 City Council Meeting Packet
Agenda City Council Meeting City of Edina, Minnesota Edina City Hall Council Chambers Tuesday, August 17, 2021 7:00 PM Watch the meeting on cable TV or at EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeetings or Facebook.com/EdinaMN. Participate in Community Comment and Public Hearing in person, or Call 800-374-0221. Enter Conference ID 6654254. Give the operator your name, street address and telephone number. Press *1 on your telephone keypad when you would like to get in the queue to speak. A City sta7 member will introduce you when it is your turn. I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Pledge of Allegiance IV.Approval Of Meeting Agenda V.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Mayor will invite residents to share issues or concerns that are not scheduled for a future public hearing. Items that are on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. The City Manager will respond to questions raised during Community Comments at the next meeting. A.City Manager's Response to Community Comments B.Resident Handout VI.Adoption Of Consent Agenda All agenda items listed on the Consent Agenda will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless requested to be removed by a Council Member. If removed the item will be considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve, unless otherwise noted in consent item.) A.Approve Minutes: Work Session and Regular, August 4, 2021 B.Approve Payment of Claims C.Ordinance No. 2021-08: Amending Chapter 10 Relating to Rental Licensing D.Ordinance No. 2021-09: Amending Chapter 26 Concerning Tra;c and Vehicles E.Resolution No. 2021-66: Approving the 2022 Budget and Dues Increase for the I-494 Corridor Commission F.Resolution No. 2021-67: Accepting Donations VII.Special Recognitions And Presentations A.Introduce Finance Director Alisha McAndrews B.Introduce Police Chief Todd Milburn C.Snow and Ice Management: Response to Citizen Concerns VIII.Public Hearings During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after sta? and/or applicants make their presentations. The following guidelines are in place to ensure an e;cient, fair, and respectful hearing; limit your testimony to three minutes and to the matter under consideration; the Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary; avoid repeating remarks or points of view made by previous speakers. The use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A.Resolution No. 2021-65: Approving Drainage Right-of-Way Easement Vacation at 7300 Claredon Drive IX.Reports/Recommendations: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A.Resolution No. 2021-64: Approving Laws 2021 First Special Session Chapter 14/HF 9, Article 8, Section 5, to Impose a Sales and Use Tax B.Resolution No. 2021-60: Establishing the 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District C.Resolution No. 2021-61, Ordinance No. 2021-10: Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Revised Overall Development Plan, Site Plan Review for 4911 77th Street West D.Resolution No. 2021-63: Supporting Hennepin County's Layout No. 2 Vernon Ave Bridge Replacement Project X.Commission Correspondence (Minutes and Advisory Communication) A.Advisory Communication: Community Health Commission: Opioid Prevention and Education B.Minutes: Human Rights & Relations Commission, June 22, 2021 XI.Aviation Noise Update XII.Mayor And Council Comments XIII.Manager's Comments XIV.Calendar of City Council Meetings and Events XV.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampliIcation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: August 17, 2021 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:City Manager's Response to Community Comments Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: City Manager Neal will respond to questions asked at the previous council meeting. Date: August 17, 2021 Agenda Item #: V.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: From: Item Activity: Subject:Resident Handout CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Resident Handout MEMORANDUM TO: EDINA COUNCIL FROM: Greg Wilson 6320 Belmore Ln Hopkins MN 55343 DATE: August 17, 2021 RE: 36-1260 Sec. 36-1260. - Lighting. All exterior lighting and illuminating devices shall be provided with lenses, reflectors or shades so as to concentrate illumination on the property of the owner or operator of the lighting or illuminating devices. Rays of light or illumination shall not pass beyond the property lines of the premises utilizing the lights or illumination at an intensity greater than 0.5 footcandle measured at property lines abutting property zoned residential and one footcandle measured at property lines abutting streets or property zoned nonresidential. No light source, lamp or luminaire shall be directed beyond the boundaries of the lighted or illuminated premises. SUGESTION Sec. 36-1260. - Lighting. 1. All exterior lighting and illuminating devices shall be provided with lenses, reflectors or shades so as to concentrate illumination on the PRIVATE property of the owner or operator of the lighting or illuminating devices. 2. Rays of light or illumination shall not pass beyond the property lines of the premises utilizing the lights or illumination at an intensity greater than 0.5 foot- candle measured at property lines abutting property zoned residential and 0.75 foot-candle measured at property lines abutting streets or property zoned nonresidential. METERING WILL BE AT AN ELEVATION EQUAL TO THE LIGHT SOURCE ELEVATION. 3. Light source, lamp or luminaire (RAYS OF LIGHT) shall NOT be directed beyond the PRIVATE PROPERTY boundaries of the lighted or illuminated premises. 4. OR 5. LIGHT RAYS EMITTING FROM THE LIGHT SOURCE SHALL NOT PASS BEYOND THE RITE-OF-WAY OR BE DIRECTED TOWARDS OTHER PRIVATE PROTERTY AT ANY ELEVATION. It is possible to be compliant at 4' from ground level and out od compliance at 20" FYI Minnetrista: Minnetrista City Code Chapter 15 - Nuisances and Misdemeanors Page 8 of 13 Section 1510 — Public Nuisances 1510.01. Public Nuisance Defined Whoever by an act or failure to perform a legal duty intentionally does any of the following is guilty of maintaining a public nuisance, which is a misdemeanor: Subdivision 1. Maintains or permits a condition which unreasonably annoys, injures or endangers the safety, health, comfort, or repose of any considerable number of members of the public; or AOL Mail (20) https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/suite SEARCH COMPOSE Search Mail SEND Save AK Spelling ut Attach "IN Insert Format Kr] Delete New Window Add Yom 'P ;j Today on AOL To: Cc Bcc New Mail 20 Subject: Old Mail Stationery Drat 17 Sent Spam 59 Recently Deleted PLEASE REFER TO PAST COUNCIL MEETING IN Contacts WHICH CARY TEAGUE STATES IN DEFENSE OF THE Calendar CUP FOR INTERLACHEN COUNTRY CLUB AND TO Folders CALM THE RESIDENCE OF WATERMAN THAT: "LIGHT WILL BE DOWN LAMPS AND WILL NOT LEAVE THE PROPERTY(BOUNDARY). PLUS ICC MET ALL COMPLIANCE MEANING 36-1260 (???). SEE COUNCIL VIDEO AT APPROX 22.00 hrs SOME STAFF INTERPRETED THE 36-1260 AS COMPLIANCE WAS ONLY THE .0.5 AND 1.0 FOOT- CANDLE.... DISREGARDING THE LAST SENTENCE OF REGULATION REGARDING LEAVING THE BOUNDARY AT ANY FOOT-CANDLE LEVEL BOUNDARIES 1 of 1 8/17/2021, 5:56 PM .:visit s.ocline.at lakerpioneercom Satprday. ilugust,14,.2021 3 Minnetrista adopts new nuisance ordinance BY ELIZABETH HUSTAD laker@apgecm.com Minnetrista updated its ordinance on public nuisances with council unanimously approving the revisions Aug. 2 after working it over since ear- ly March. Guiding much of the discussion these past five months has been an attempt to remedy is- sues around due process and, related to that, the former absence of the council in dealing with nuisance violations. "I think there are ad- equate procedural safe- guards in this revised or- dinance," said Ron Batty, city attorney for Minne- trista. "And the council now has a key role to play." Though most nuisance violations are easily rem- edied and rarely reach even the level of a cita- tion, the more extreme cases would now come before council, a provi- sion notably absent from the previous ordinance. Instances in which the council would take a role in nuisance abatement are expected to be very few. "If, and only if, the City and the proper- ty owner are unable to come to agreement as to a plan moving forward, the matter would come before the City Council for further consideration and possible abatement action," explained An- drew Biggerstaff, assis- tance city attorney, in a memo to council just ahead of final the coun- cil's final discussion of the new ordinance. If someone found to be in violation is given a notice to remedy the problem but does not do so within the time constraints specified by the notice, they can now appeal to the council, which would review the case, determine a new timeline for remedying the problem and, if there still is no compliance, could then order that the city* abate the issue. Council would also be able to act in emergency cases that "unreasonably endanger public health, safety, or welfare" and for which immediate ac- tion is necessary. In these cases, council "may order summary enforcement and abatement." Biggerstaff noted that the new ordinance is a "reactionary" tool that, like the previous one, is be complaint-based. It also does not vest authority in just one of- ficial. "Affected prop- erty owners would gen- erally have the ability to seek a hearing before the City Council prior to any abatement action occurring," he wrote in his memo. "This multi- process step is critical to avoid any particular official having unilat- eral authority to apply the nuisance regulations without City Council ap- proval." In updating public nuisance definitions, the new ordinance is more expansive than previ- ously: the old ordinance had defined 11 kinds of nuisance to the 17 that are now given special attention, and the new ordinance includes par- ticulars around animal carcasses, manure, dis- eased animals and, for some areas; the height of grass and weeds. Other nuisances that were already listed in the previous ordinance have been expanded in the revised ordinance to in- clude either more specific language or more catch- all language—or both. Open excavations and wires strung out across roadways don't have their own separate mentions anymore and instead are covered by a nuisance definition that is both more specific through its explicit mention of open wells and pits and, more generic through its inclu- sion of the far-ranging words "other obstruc- tion": the line now pro- hibits "any open well, pit, excavation, structure, barrier or other obstruc- tion which endangers public health, safety or welfare." Flexibility in the lan- guage used is a good thing for a nuisance or- dinance, said Batty, who explained during a final work session on the topic that especially for cities like Minnetrista, charac- terized by both a subur- ban and an agricultural character, some issues might not be much of a - problem. "There isn't a one size fits all approach to this," he said. The new ordinance also EST. [id 19g6 expands the definition for" a kind of nuisance that can be more difficult to abate: outdoor storage. The updated ordinance defines as a public nui- sance "excessive exterior storage" that contributes to the "blighted condition of a property, or which is open and obvious to neighboring properties or to the general public from public areas." The previ- ous ordinance was more brief and more heavily focused on junked and unlicensed vehicles. • - To view the new or- dinance in full, visit the city's website at http:// www.cityofminme- trista.com/minnettis- ta-city-code. L; Follow The Laker Pio- neer on Facebook. PIZZA, BURGERS, WINGS & MORE! TAKE Date: August 17, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve Minutes: Work Session and Regular, August 4, 2021 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Minutes as presented. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: Draft Work Session, August 4 Minutes: Draft Regular, August 4 MINUTES OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AND CLOSED MEETING VIRTUAL MEETING WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 4, 2021 5:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:31 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, and Mayor Hovland. Staff in attendance: Lisa Schaefer, Assistant City Manager; Derik Otten, Facility Manager; Tom Swenson, Parks and Natural Resources Assistant Director; Perry Vetter, Parks & Recreation Director; Brian Olson, Public Works Director; Risi Karim, City Management Fellow; MJ Lamon, Community Engagement Coordinator; and Jane Timm, Deputy City Clerk. PUBLIC WORKS AND PARKS MAINTENANCE STAFFING STUDY Assistant City Manager, Lisa Schaefer introduced Jonathan Ingram from Novak Consulting Group now Raftelis to present the findings of the Public Works and Parks Maintenance Staffing study. Mr. Ingram gave an overview of the project to Council members and staff followed by the key findings and 23 recommendations. Mr. Ingram said that staff engaged in the process and found they were dedicated and strived to offer exceptional services to the community. The report included observations and recommendations intended to improve the effectiveness of the Public Works, Engineering and Parks & Recreation staff including additional staff necessary to meet service level expectations of the community. Council members asked what the next steps would be. Mr. Ingram explained there was an implementation plan and recommended timeframe, but it was up to the City Council and staff to move forward with the implementation plan. CLOSED SESSION Staff in attendance at Closed Session: Lisa Schaefer, Assistant City Manager; Brian Olson, Public Works Director; and Jane Timm, Deputy City Clerk Attorney Paul Reuvers, Iverson Reuvers MOTION TO CLOSE SESSION: As permitted by MS 13D.05, Subd. 3(b) for Attorney-Client Privilege to Discuss Robert C. Tengdin, Trustee of the Robert C. Tengdin Revocable Trust dated May 18, 2009 v. City of Edina Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson, to close the meeting as permitted by MS 13D.05, Subd. 3(b) for Attorney-Client Privilege to discuss Robert C. Tengdin, Trustee of the Robert C. Tengdin Revocable Trust dated May 18, 2009 v. City of Edina. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Edina City Council Closed and Work Session Meeting, August 4, 2021 Motion carried. UPDATE ON ROBERT C. TENGDIN, TRUSTEE OF THE ROBERT C. TENGDIN REVOCABLE TRUST DATED MAY 18, 2009 V. CITY OF EDINA Attorney Paul Reuvers updated Council on the Robert C. Tengdin, Trustee of the Robert C. Tengdin Revocable Trust dated May 18, 2009 v. City of Edina litigation. MOTION TO MOVE BACK INTO OPEN SESSION Member Pierce made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson to move back into open session. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:32 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ____________________________________________ Jane Timm, Deputy City Clerk Minutes approved by the Edina City Council, August 17, 2021. ___________________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 4, 2021 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m., then shared the procedure for public hearing and community comment in the hybrid meeting format. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland. Absent: None. III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IV. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED AS PRESENTED Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, to approve the meeting agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT Andy Brown, 5512 Park Place, inquired about construction status of Fire Stations 2 and 3 and why Edina did not provide broadband services to residents. Erin Brumm, 4208 Mavelle Drive, shared concerns regarding conditions at 7200 France Avenue regarding yard maintenance, vandalism, and an increase in crime. V.A. CITY MANAGER’S RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY COMMENTS Assistant Manager Schaefer responded to Community Comments from the last meeting. VI. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED AS PRESENTED Member Pierce made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson approving the consent agenda as presented: VI.A. Approve minutes of the Work Session and Regular Meetings of July 21, 2021 VI.B. Approve Claims for Payment for Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated July 23, 2021 totaling $1,195,705.90 and Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated July 30, 2021 totaling $1,563,294.54 VI.C. Request for Purchase; awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Engineering and Design of Tactical Training Center at South Metro Public Safety Training Facility, $82,500 VI.D. Approve Amendment to E911 Call Handling System Agreement VI.E. Request for Purchase; awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, 2022 Ford F550 Truck with Stainless Steel Dump Box, Boyer Ford and Aspen Equipment, $73,484 VI.F. Request for Purchase; awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Yancey Tennis Court Replacement, Bituminous Roadways, $72,256 VI.G. Request for Purchase; awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Rosland Tennis Court Replacement, Bituminous Roadways, $72,256 VI.H. Request for Purchase; awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Walnut Ridge Tennis Court Replacement, Bituminous Roadways, $72,256 VI.I. Accept Petition; Install Speed Limit Signs on Antrim Road Minutes/Edina City Council/August 4, 2021 Page 2 VI.J. Approve Traffic Safety Report of June 29, 2021 VI.K. Approve Certificate of Completion for Amundson Flats VI.L. Request for Purchase; awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Braemar Ice Arena Roof Repairs, Central Roofing, $99,039 VI.M. Request for Purchase; awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Phase 2 Lake Level Management Plan Development for Arrowhead and Indianhead Lakes VI.N. Adopt Resolution No. 2021-62; Set September 9, 2021, as Public Hearing Date for Modification to Southdale 2 TIF Plan Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS - Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VII.A. NEW ON-SALE INTOXICATING AND SUNDAY SALE LIQUOR LICENSES FOR 3BEST RESTAURANT GROUP LLC DBA MR. PAUL’S SUPPER CLUB – APPROVED Ms. Schaefer said the Council was asked to approve a new On-Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale Liquor Licenses for 3Best Restaurant Group LLC dba Mr. Paul's Supper Club, located at 3917 Market Street, Unit B, Edina. Staff reviewed the application and found it complied with code requirements, including the background investigation, and recommended approval of the liquor licenses. Ms. Schaefer said staff requested Council approval immediately instead of carrying over to the next Council meeting as the applicant anticipated opening November 1. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:16 p.m. Public Testimony Roberta Castellano, 4854 France Avenue South, addressed the Council. Ms. Schaefer responded to questions raised during public testimony and said the additional report was related to the full police background and a summary was presented for public purposes instead but the full redacted report could be provided if requested. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Anderson, to close the public hearing. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Anderson, to approve a new On-Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale Liquor Licenses for 3Best Restaurant Group LLC dba Mr. Paul's Supper Club, a restaurant located at 3917 Market Street, Unit B, Edina. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. Tommy Begnaud, owner, shared about their proposed restaurant and thanked the Council for the opportunity. VII.B. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-60 ESTABLISHING THE 4040 WEST 70TH STREET TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT – CONTINUED TO AUGUST 17, 2021 Affordable Housing Development Manager Hawkinson stated this item pertained to the creation of a new Tax Increment Financing District to support the redevelopment of property at 4040 West 70th Street that would include the creation of approximately 118 units of affordable rental housing. This item also included a modification to the Plan for the existing Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District to recognize the new TIF District and to enable pooling necessary to provide financial support for affordable housing in Edina and noted staff recommended approval of this resolution. Minutes/Edina City Council/August 4, 2021 Page 3 The Council asked questions regarding the total amount of TIF in the City. Nick Anhut, Ehlers, clarified the total amount of TIF in the City and said with the updated expansion of tax base staff anticipated the captured tax capacity would decrease to 1%. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:37 p.m. Public Testimony Roberta Castellano, 4854 France Avenue South, addressed the Council. Hannelore Brucker, 5153 Abercrombie Drive, addressed the Council. Anne Marie Plante, 4801 West 70th Street, addressed the Council. Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson, to extend public hearing to noon on August 9, 2021, and take final action on Resolution No. 2021- 60 Establishing the 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District, at the August 17, 2021, meeting. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VII.C. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-61, ORDINANCE NO. 2021-10; ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, REVISED OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR 4911 77TH STREET WEST – CONTINUED TO AUGUST 17, 2021 Community Development Director Teague stated the Council was asked to consider a proposal for a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to revise the previously approved plans for the Pentagon Park South (PUD- 17) known as Pentagon Village, which was approved in 2019. The applicants, Jay Scott, Solomon Real Estate and Rise Development, were proposing to develop the vacant lot in the southeast corner of the development, with a 6-story, 200-unit apartment. Ten percent (10%) of the units would be for affordable housing. On May 26, 2021 the Planning Commission had motions made to approve and deny the request, which both failed on the same split votes, and based on feedback from the Planning Commission, the applicant submitted additional renderings to better show the project along the north side and ground level. Mr. Teague highlighted the area the Planning Commission had concerns with in regard to lack of landscaping and greenspace then outlined the parking study results which concluded that parking would be adequate and no roadway improvements needed. He shared concerns raised by the public that included traffic, affordable housing, and plan clarity. Jay Scott, Solomon Properties, shared an overview of the project that included a change from a restaurant to a future lot due to impacts from COVID-19 and stated the office user would support the proposed hotel of 235 rooms. He said they were still pursuing uses that blended well in the area and noted there was a lack of housing in close proximity to office uses so this use would work well. David Stahl, Cunningham Architects, reviewed the proposed plans in detail and stressed the inclusion of walkability, seating, art niches, and other features. He outlined the guest parking solutions, pollinator- friendly plantings, and reviewed the proposed materials of metal and wood look. He shared about the plaza deck with outdoor areas and a pool and noted 20 affordable units would be disbursed throughout the project. The Council asked questions regarding parking and concerns about having the back of the project facing north and the plaza deck facing south. Mr. Scott shared that all parking stalls would have electric charging ports available. Christian Lawrence, Rise Modular, explained how the ground level was activated to the north and their desire to capture the sunlight and with the north side approved for a hotel this orientation would provide more privacy than facing the hotel. He shared more about the proposed modular construction process that was faster, more efficient, and environmentally sustainable. Minutes/Edina City Council/August 4, 2021 Page 4 The Council inquired about ingress/egress points on the north for both the apartments and future hotel and noted the hotel was currently rebidding and if the applicant would continue with the hotel construction. Mr. Stahl confirmed the door-facing orientation in relation to having parking accessible to the ramp and said they were encouraged the hotel construction would occur. The Council asked more about the presentation of the building and creation of boulevard enhancements without changing pool direction through inclusion of balconies and other elements. The Council asked how modular construction could be retrofitted in the future if needed then spoke about the ability to expand the parking ramp in the future. Mr. Lawrence shared how their focus was on the streetscape to address the Planning Commission’s concerns then noted the project’s birds eye view had been flipped to face the remainder of The Village. The Council asked about smart city planning, the plan for solar and car sharing, the opportunity to include smart appliances in units, and solar garden possibilities. The Council spoke about the north side and shadowing, especially with the addition of the hotel, and the decreased mold risk with modular because its dry from building to delivering. The Council commented on availability for bike lanes, landscaping maintenance, and connection to the 9-Mile Creek trail then asked about entries on the east and west sides and confirmed the sidewalk system and other utilities were in place on the site. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:50 p.m. Public Testimony Hannelore Brucker, 5153 Abercrombie Drive, addressed the Council. Roberta Castellano, 4854 France Avenue South, addressed the Council. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, to extend public hearing to noon on August 9, 2021, and take final action on Resolution No. 2021- 61 Approving an Ordinance Amendment to Change the Use and Approved Overall Development Plans Including Revised Final Site Plan Approval in the PUD-17 Zoning District and Ordinance No. 2021-10 an Ordinance Amending the Zoning Ordinance to Revise the PUD-17, Planned Unit Development-17 Zoning District, at the August 17, 2021, meeting. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VIII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. ORDINANCE NO. 2021-09; AMENDING CHAPTER 26 CONCERNING TRAFFIC AND VEHICLES – FIRST READING GRANTED Transportation Planner Scipioni shared a summary of the analysis undertaken to inform the City’s approach to setting speed limits on local streets in accordance with City policies and recent State legislative authority. He shared the key findings and recommendations of this analysis in detail, outlined existing conditions, and said staff recommended a uniform approach to setting local speed limits as outlined with 30 mph on four- lane major streets and other major streets with high non-local traffic; 25 mph on two-lane major and minor streets; 20 mph on major streets within School Zones; 15 mph on minor streets within School Zones; and 10 mph on alleys (no change from current restriction). Mr. Scipioni outlined the public engagement process used and implementation plans if approved and said no additional enforcement was recommended or police resources as data supported most drivers travel at or below posted speed limits. The Council spoke about resident input, the two-year evaluation period, and how to collect public input then asked more about the implementation plan and two-year period before and after. The Council asked more about recommended speed limits and how there would be no changes to alleys then asked for further clarification on school zones. Mr. Scipioni responded how input would be taken that would include Minutes/Edina City Council/August 4, 2021 Page 5 contacting the City similar to all other traffic safety concerns or a petition process and said the City would begin replacing signs by the end of August through 2021 and make changes as warranted then thanked the Traffic Commission for their work. The Council spoke how changes had happened over time that resulted in narrower streets and more sidewalks and the importance to implement speed limit changes to complement these changes and make it safer for pedestrians. Member Staunton made a motion to grant First Reading of Ordinance No. 2021-09, amending Chapter 26 of the Edina City Code concerning Traffic and Vehicles and approval of implementation plan as presented. Member Pierce seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.B. ORDINANCE NO. 2021-08; AMENDING CHAPTER 10 RELATING TO RENTAL LICENSING – FIRST READING GRANTED Management Fellow Karim stated on April 8, 2021, members of the Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority (HRA) authorized staff to engage the City Attorney to draft a proposed Tenant Protection Ordinance to bring forward to the City Council for adoption. The City had set a goal to both promote and commit to preserving natural occurring affordable housing (NOAH). Protecting tenants who reside in NOAH properties should always be a priority for the city. She explained more about NOAH properties and the goal to provide a full range of housing choices, particularly for low-income residents, and said staff was requesting the Council amend the Code to preserve existing NOAH properties, protect tenants’ rights, and) provide added security and housing stability for tenants who depended on residing in units with affordable rents. She outlined the program in detail and said neighboring cities like St. Louis Park, Bloomington, Richfield, and Hopkins had adopted similar ordinances. Ms. Karim said a part of securing some of the City’s most vulnerable housing communities was to support tenant rights to ensure that renters were treated fairly and equitably by landlords then outlined the community engagement that included a roundtable with community partners. The Council asked how the ordinance differed from other cities and complimented staff on the useful ordinance. Ms. Karim noted the differences occurred because Edina was a statutory city which restricted the ability to implement penalties but could provide accountability through rental licensing code. City Attorney Kendall explained how rent could not be raised during the 90-day notification period but the tenant could remain. The Council referred to comments made from the Minneapolis Area Board of Realtors who said they were pleased to be involved in the process then asked how relocation assistance amounts were derived and would be communicated. Ms. Karim explained how the amounts were based on similar cities and the goal to remain consistent and how staff would work to notify new property owners as part of the rental inspection process. Member Jackson made a motion to grant First Reading of Ordinance No. 2021-08, amending Chapter 10 of the Edina City Code relating to Rental Licensing. Member Pierce seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.C. AGREEMENT WITH UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA AND MMRC FOR MOBILE ECMO TRUCK AND OPERATIONS – APPROVED EMS Chief Quinn shared the City, in cooperation with University of Minnesota and Minnesota Mobile Resuscitation Consortium (MMRC), would be providing mobile Extraperateul Cardiac Monitoring and Oxygenation (ECMO) services utilizing staff from Edina Fire Department and a vehicle provided by the Minutes/Edina City Council/August 4, 2021 Page 6 University of Minnesota. He outlined how the proposal would help the community and surrounding area and be supported by a charitable foundation then outlined the costs and partnerships that would result in increased survival rates. Fire Chief Slama shared further comments on partnership and staffing and the unique opportunity to be at the pioneer stage of technology. He explained more about patient transport and the goal to provide this intervention to more patients at a faster rate. Member Anderson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, to approve the agreement with the University of Minnesota and MMRC for Mobile ECMO truck and operations. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.D. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-54; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR INTERLACHEN COUNTRY CLUB, 6200 INTERLACHEN BOULEVARD - ADOPTED Member Pierce stated his conflict of interest regarding this item then recused himself from discussion and left the dais. Community Development Director Teague said staff added conditions to the resolution based on the discussion at the City Council July 21 public hearing and how the Planning Commission recommendation failed to receive a majority approval. He said Interlachen Country Club was requesting a Conditional Use Permit to expand the boundaries of the Country Club and add a new parking lot and expanded practice area off Waterman Avenue. There are two single-family homes, owned by the Country Club, that would continue as single-family homes that would serve as a buffer to the single-family homes to the west. A gate would be constructed at the end of Waterman Avenue, just past the single-family homes owned by the Country Club. The gate would be closed for access to the Club from Waterman for the purpose of employees, members, guests, and delivery trucks to use the main entrance off Interlachen Boulevard. The Country Club would be constructing the new cul-de-sac and roadway improvements at their expense. He outlined input from the public hearing and response and added safety improvements for employees and visitors and outlined conditions that included a revised landscaping plan subject to review of the City Forester that included additional trees for screening and other elements. The Council shared concerns about the proposed removal of mature trees and the resulting impact on carbon footprint. Joel Livingood, General Manager of Interlachen Country Club, said majority of trees were mature but would be replaced with larger trees in accordance with the ordinance at more than the 1:1 replacement requirement. Brian Boland, Interlachen Country Club, outlined in detail the 36 large trees, 20 significant arborvitaes, and less significant spruce and pine trees. The Council spoke about the early morning deliveries and how that control could happen earlier, impact to neighbors, crime statistics, and further explanation on the large events subject to fire department emergency plans. The Council asked about the loss of naturally occurring affordable housing on the four properties currently owned. Mr. Livingood summarized that all properties were purchased with values in excess for affordable housing and noted they were used for staff housing rent free which could be considered affordable. Mr. Teague outlined crime statistics and boundaries outside of the Country Club itself over a two-year period and did not see a correlation of increased crime. The Council confirmed future expansion for items such as training facilities. Mr. Livingood said their board had no intentions of expansion outside of the CUP and could possibly agree to that in writing after consideration with their board. Minutes/Edina City Council/August 4, 2021 Page 7 The Council discussed the concerns raised regarding the supposed changes to the Comprehensive Plan as golf and parking were both permitted in R-1 zoning. The Council spoke about the health, safety and welfare concerns and impact on properties but felt the project would improve traffic with conditions on the gate, that crime was not substantiated, then commented on greenhouse gases emissions and heat island definitions were not a violation of health/safety/welfare as the added conditions would help to address the neighborhood’s concerns. The Council shared concerns about earth moving and drainage and confirmed both watersheds found the proposal acceptable as it would improve water in the lakes overall and were satisfied with the concerns regarding affordable housing as there was no housing to lose. The Council stated effective downcast lighting was critical and the creation of no outlet would result in higher property values. The Council would like to see taller conifers on the west side to create the best buffer possible and requested agreement outside of the CUP to not expand further into the neighborhood that could possibly provide for affordable housing in the future. Mr. Livingood said he would be comfortable stating no future expansion for parking but could not confirm no other future expansions without throughout discussions with the board but said Interlachen was a good community partner and planned to continue that partnership through provisions of additional trees for screening. Member Staunton introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2021- 54 Approving a Conditional Use Permit to Expand the Boundaries and Add a New Parking Lot at The Interlachen Country Club at 6200 Interlachen Boulevard with amendment to Condition 3B as outlined. Member Anderson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Staunton, Hovland Abstain: Pierce Motion carried. Following a short recess, Member Pierce returned to the dais. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS - Received IX.A. COMMISSION CORRESPONDENCE (MINUTES AND ADVISORY COMMUNICATION) 1. MINUTES: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION, JUNE 8, 2021 2. MINUTES: ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION, JUNE 10, 2021 3. MINUTES: TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, JUNE 17, 2021 4. MINUTES: ARTS AND CULTURE COMMISSION, JUNE 24, 2021 X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE – Received XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received XII. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received XII.A. BUDGET WORK PLAN, RACE AND EQUITY WORK PLAN, AND FINANCIAL REPORT UPDATES XII. CALENDAR OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AND EVENTS – Received XIV. ADJOURNMENT Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, to adjourn the meeting at 11:31 p.m. Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Minutes/Edina City Council/August 4, 2021 Page 8 Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, August 17, 2021. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the August 4, 2021, meeting available. Date: August 17, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Claims From:Alisha McAndrews, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Approve Payment of Claims Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve claims for payment: Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 08.06.21 TOTAL $2,231,317.65 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 08.06.21 #2 TOTAL $18,044.50 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 08.13.21 TOTAL $1,099,700.12 INTRODUCTION: Claims information for approval is attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 08.06.21 TOTAL $2,231,317.65 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 08.06.21 #2 TOTAL $18,044.50 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 08.13.21 TOTAL $1,099,700.12 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 44 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND SUB FUND DUE TO DUE FR 1000 General 382,443.662100 Police Special Revenue 1,242.002300 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety 2,436.752500 Conservation & Sustainability 297.002600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 23,367.502600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 761.002600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 2,902.502600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 3,599.002600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 1,113.002600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 18,417.542600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 678.504000 Capital Projects 45,543.444400 PIR Capital Projects 507,867.985100 Art Center 727.555200 Braemar Golf Course 13,531.395200 Braemar Golf Course 29,421.015300 Aquatic Center 9,816.895400 Edinborough Park 11,002.135500 Braemar Arena 7,352.495600 Braemar Field 60.005700 Centennial Lakes 13,863.815800 Liquor 227,752.445900 Utility Fund 683,637.535900 Utility Fund 12,762.065900 Utility Fund 208,964.826100 Equipment Operations 13,008.796200 Information Technology 266.476300 Facilities Management 5,108.207100 PS Training Facility 874.227200 MN Task Force 1 2,497.989999 Pooled Cash Fund 2,231,317.65 TOTAL 2,231,317.65 2,231,317.65 ** END OF REPORT - Generated by Lonnia Jefferson ** City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 1 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463316 08/06/2021 PRTD 133644 A DYNAMIC DOOR CO INC 22107062 07/07/2021 20210806 2,191.55 CHECK 463316 TOTAL: 2,191.55 463317 08/06/2021 PRTD 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 0167984-IN 07/07/2021 20210806 45.92 CHECK 463317 TOTAL: 45.92 463318 08/06/2021 PRTD 143143 ACT CLEANING SERVICE 1713 07/14/2021 20210806 1,462.34 CHECK 463318 TOTAL: 1,462.34 463319 08/06/2021 PRTD 100620 AIM ELECTRONICS INC 42987 07/12/2021 20210806 450.00 CHECK 463319 TOTAL: 450.00 463320 08/06/2021 PRTD 130792 AIRGAS NATIONAL CARBONATION 9115164159 07/08/2021 20210806 514.50 CHECK 463320 TOTAL: 514.50 463321 08/06/2021 PRTD 120796 ALERUS RETIREMENT AND BENEFITS C109686 07/06/2021 20210806 226.00 CHECK 463321 TOTAL: 226.00 463322 08/06/2021 PRTD 100575 AMERICAN CYLINDER LLC 189045 07/07/2021 20210806 54.33 CHECK 463322 TOTAL: 54.33 463323 08/06/2021 PRTD 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1JXG-YHDY-9MFQ 07/06/2021 20210806 22.30 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 11X9-W9Y6-CQT1 07/07/2021 20210806 38.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1PGX-1CDF-1NJY 07/07/2021 20210806 57.20 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1NL6-3M9M-9QRT 07/08/2021 20210806 402.80 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 19F4-9YXT-9RF7 07/08/2021 20210806 61.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1NCN-YLHJ-31RV 07/08/2021 20210806 19.97 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 14R9-C4PP-FDP9 07/09/2021 20210806 38.85 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1V1N-MF7Q-FNT3 07/09/2021 20210806 34.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 13DX-61KH-HG4G 07/09/2021 20210806 77.91 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 2 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1WY4-GDKY-N1QD 07/10/2021 20210806 189.94 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 14CW-KF3T-MGYR 07/10/2021 20210806 562.25 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1CWP-PLLK-W9WY 07/11/2021 20210806 6.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1HXV-XJ9C-VWWK 07/11/2021 20210806 237.50 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1WY4-GDKY-T936 07/11/2021 20210806 35.96 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1GHC-964P-VQJV 07/11/2021 20210806 65.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 17TL-TW7Y-NT4N 07/11/2021 20210806 248.90 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1J3J-PTWM-6143 07/12/2021 20210806 399.48 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1J3J-PTWM-4XLC 07/12/2021 20210806 172.59 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 16NY-1K4J-4N7G 07/12/2021 20210806 178.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1MLY-49LP-449K 07/12/2021 20210806 287.18 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 16NY-1K4J-3F7R 07/12/2021 20210806 47.77 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1XV4-3CDW-7WJG 07/12/2021 20210806 17.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 16TF-C4FP-9774 07/12/2021 20210806 102.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1XQN-QDQ7-6CY7 07/12/2021 20210806 165.30 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1LVV-9X7N-14TX 07/12/2021 20210806 33.66 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1HCW-TCL3-7TCL 07/31/2021 20210806 114.95 CHECK 463323 TOTAL: 3,623.36 463324 08/06/2021 PRTD 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING INC 102484 06/28/2021 20210806 974.00 AQUA ENGINEERING INC 102734 07/09/2021 20210806 552.45 CHECK 463324 TOTAL: 1,526.45 463325 08/06/2021 PRTD 151441 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 1005092980 07/07/2021 20210806 505.80 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 1005095671 07/12/2021 20210806 204.18 CHECK 463325 TOTAL: 709.98 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 3 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463326 08/06/2021 PRTD 102012 ARMENIAN CULTURAL ORGANIZATION OF 21CLP825 07/26/2021 20210806 150.00 CHECK 463326 TOTAL: 150.00 463327 08/06/2021 PRTD 106304 ASPEN MILLS INC 276903 07/06/2021 20210806 244.55 ASPEN MILLS INC 276866 07/06/2021 20210806 171.80 CHECK 463327 TOTAL: 416.35 463328 08/06/2021 PRTD 143335 ASSURED ASPHALT 7.6.21 07/06/2021 20210806 2,100.00 CHECK 463328 TOTAL: 2,100.00 463329 08/06/2021 PRTD 132408 AUTHENTIC EDGE LLC 1405 07/06/2021 20210806 3,875.00 CHECK 463329 TOTAL: 3,875.00 463330 08/06/2021 PRTD 144832 BAKER TILLY VIRCHOW KRAUSE LLP BT1866550 07/12/2021 20210806 7,800.00 CHECK 463330 TOTAL: 7,800.00 463331 08/06/2021 PRTD 103241 BALDINGER, WENDY 21CLP810 07/26/2021 20210806 250.00 CHECK 463331 TOTAL: 250.00 463332 08/06/2021 PRTD 129624 BARNA GUZY & STEFFEN LTD 233065 07/12/2021 20210806 320.00 CHECK 463332 TOTAL: 320.00 463333 08/06/2021 PRTD 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23270354.00-271 07/07/2021 20210806 5,520.50 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23271827.01-6 07/07/2021 20210806 652.10 CHECK 463333 TOTAL: 6,172.60 463334 08/06/2021 PRTD 102709 BDS LAUNDRY SYSTEMS LMV413319 07/09/2021 20210806 271.95 CHECK 463334 TOTAL: 271.95 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 4 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463335 08/06/2021 PRTD 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC 601456 07/08/2021 20210806 435.25 CHECK 463335 TOTAL: 435.25 463336 08/06/2021 PRTD 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0103576600 07/15/2021 20210806 34.15 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0090404800 07/22/2021 20210806 2,696.40 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0090358700 07/22/2021 20210806 279.10 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0103618500 07/22/2021 20210806 23.75 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0090405300 07/22/2021 20210806 2,381.61 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0103618600 07/22/2021 20210806 29.13 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0103618000 07/22/2021 20210806 201.92 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0090358300 07/22/2021 20210806 179.10 CHECK 463336 TOTAL: 5,825.16 463337 08/06/2021 PRTD 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC 4985534 07/08/2021 20210806 468.00 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC 4987088 07/12/2021 20210806 702.00 CHECK 463337 TOTAL: 1,170.00 463338 08/06/2021 PRTD 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 13582 07/16/2021 20210806 513.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 13581 07/16/2021 20210806 423.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 13640 07/22/2021 20210806 273.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 13639 07/22/2021 20210806 182.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 13638 07/22/2021 20210806 182.00 CHECK 463338 TOTAL: 1,573.00 463339 08/06/2021 PRTD 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84118925 07/06/2021 20210806 1,417.30 CHECK 463339 TOTAL: 1,417.30 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 5 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463340 08/06/2021 PRTD 117040 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC 07P9473 07/07/2021 20210806 77.74 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC 07P9695 07/09/2021 20210806 77.74 CHECK 463340 TOTAL: 155.48 463341 08/06/2021 PRTD 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340339691 07/21/2021 20210806 375.15 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340339690 07/21/2021 20210806 65.29 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340339688 07/21/2021 20210806 1,762.63 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340339689 07/21/2021 20210806 3,886.12 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340339709 07/21/2021 20210806 1,638.12 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340339704 07/21/2021 20210806 2,644.70 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340339706 07/21/2021 20210806 140.55 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340339705 07/21/2021 20210806 62.52 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340339708 07/21/2021 20210806 375.15 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340339710 07/21/2021 20210806 538.60 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340339711 07/21/2021 20210806 2,288.46 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340339712 07/21/2021 20210806 2,745.20 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340339713 07/21/2021 20210806 375.15 CHECK 463341 TOTAL: 16,897.64 463342 08/06/2021 PRTD 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 360019265 06/23/2021 20210806 -167.75 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 340337459 07/20/2021 20210806 166.20 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 340337458 07/20/2021 20210806 4,094.15 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 340337461 07/21/2021 20210806 3,553.90 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 340337463 07/20/2021 20210806 4,052.60 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 340337462 07/20/2021 20210806 83.10 CHECK 463342 TOTAL: 11,782.20 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 6 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463343 08/06/2021 PRTD 104301 RUECKERT, MARY 21CLP89 07/26/2021 20210806 150.00 CHECK 463343 TOTAL: 150.00 463344 08/06/2021 PRTD 130485 BRUESKE, TARA 21FM0812 07/12/2021 20210806 200.00 CHECK 463344 TOTAL: 200.00 463345 08/06/2021 PRTD 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT 21CLP831 07/26/2021 20210806 250.00 CHECK 463345 TOTAL: 250.00 463346 08/06/2021 PRTD 100648 BERTELSON BROTHERS INC WO-1134970-2 07/06/2021 20210806 51.19 BERTELSON BROTHERS INC WO-1135535-1 07/08/2021 20210806 27.89 CHECK 463346 TOTAL: 79.08 463347 08/06/2021 PRTD 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 933516271 07/07/2021 20210806 199.80 CALLAWAY GOLF 933527822 07/09/2021 20210806 162.90 CHECK 463347 TOTAL: 362.70 463348 08/06/2021 PRTD 123615 CANADA GOOSE MANAGEMENT INC 202127 07/03/2021 20210806 7,870.00 CHECK 463348 TOTAL: 7,870.00 463349 08/06/2021 PRTD 130315 CANNON VALLEY SPECIALTIES 21176 07/07/2021 20210806 72.00 CHECK 463349 TOTAL: 72.00 463350 08/06/2021 PRTD 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2572472 07/16/2021 20210806 2,661.05 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2572471 07/16/2021 20210806 41.25 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2572473 07/16/2021 20210806 117.00 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2573484 07/20/2021 20210806 2,939.50 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2573407 07/20/2021 20210806 234.00 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2573483 07/20/2021 20210806 100.75 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 7 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2572474 07/16/2021 20210806 5,709.40 CHECK 463350 TOTAL: 11,802.95 463351 08/06/2021 PRTD 138539 CARLIN, BRADLEY P 21CLP818 07/26/2021 20210806 150.00 CHECK 463351 TOTAL: 150.00 463352 08/06/2021 PRTD 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY 567906 07/08/2021 20210806 193.14 CHECK 463352 TOTAL: 193.14 463353 08/06/2021 PRTD 135835 CENTURYLINK-ACCESS BILL 5142XLP683-2021189 07/08/2021 20210806 1,242.00 CHECK 463353 TOTAL: 1,242.00 463354 08/06/2021 PRTD 142533 CADD ENGR SUPPLY INC INV129505 07/12/2021 20210806 96.50 CHECK 463354 TOTAL: 96.50 463355 08/06/2021 PRTD 100683 CHEMSEARCH 7429604 07/07/2021 20210806 657.22 CHECK 463355 TOTAL: 657.22 463356 08/06/2021 PRTD 160160 CHRISTIANSON'S BUSINESS FURNITURE 5535-1-KR 07/06/2021 20210806 1,959.00 CHECK 463356 TOTAL: 1,959.00 463357 08/06/2021 PRTD 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 4088987673 07/06/2021 20210806 28.62 CINTAS CORPORATION 4088987610 07/06/2021 20210806 30.25 CINTAS CORPORATION 4088987635 07/06/2021 20210806 11.78 CINTAS CORPORATION 4088987683 07/06/2021 20210806 37.28 CINTAS CORPORATION 4088987581 07/06/2021 20210806 44.45 CINTAS CORPORATION 4088987486 07/06/2021 20210806 3.69 CINTAS CORPORATION 4089693041 07/12/2021 20210806 52.53 CINTAS CORPORATION 4089693093 07/12/2021 20210806 17.52 CINTAS CORPORATION 4089693453 07/12/2021 20210806 23.09 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 8 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CINTAS CORPORATION 4089693319 07/12/2021 20210806 11.78 CINTAS CORPORATION 4089693458 07/12/2021 20210806 30.25 CINTAS CORPORATION 4089693340 07/12/2021 20210806 34.88 CINTAS CORPORATION 4089693327 07/12/2021 20210806 28.62 CINTAS CORPORATION 4090264365 07/16/2021 20210806 81.48 CHECK 463357 TOTAL: 436.22 463358 08/06/2021 PRTD 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS COM-2443 07/12/2021 20210806 100.00 CHECK 463358 TOTAL: 100.00 463359 08/06/2021 PRTD 102165 ROGER CLEVELAND GOLF CO. INC 6491622 SO 06/30/2021 20210806 100.68 CHECK 463359 TOTAL: 100.68 463360 08/06/2021 PRTD 120433 COMCAST HOLDINGS CORPORATION 0740105-7/21 07/18/2021 20210806 88.03 CHECK 463360 TOTAL: 88.03 463361 08/06/2021 PRTD 144092 CONCENTRA 103397726 07/07/2021 20210806 177.50 CHECK 463361 TOTAL: 177.50 463362 08/06/2021 PRTD 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC 0209017-IN 07/07/2021 20210806 494.40 CHECK 463362 TOTAL: 494.40 463363 08/06/2021 PRTD 140999 CORE-MARK MIDCONTINENT INC 8273136 07/06/2021 20210806 526.30 CHECK 463363 TOTAL: 526.30 463364 08/06/2021 PRTD 119214 CUSTOM HOSE TECH 106824 07/07/2021 20210806 211.01 CHECK 463364 TOTAL: 211.01 463365 08/06/2021 PRTD 133169 DAIKIN APPLIED 3311507 07/06/2021 20210806 1,742.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 9 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 463365 TOTAL: 1,742.00 463366 08/06/2021 PRTD 102195 DAY INVESTMENTS LLC P41394664 07/06/2021 20210806 59.98 DAY INVESTMENTS LLC P41393329 07/06/2021 20210806 121.95 CHECK 463366 TOTAL: 181.93 463367 08/06/2021 PRTD 100718 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 50866/1 07/12/2021 20210806 13.30 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY K43815/1 07/12/2021 20210806 9.64 CHECK 463367 TOTAL: 22.94 463368 08/06/2021 PRTD 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3676638 07/12/2021 20210806 678.50 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3676640 07/12/2021 20210806 1,033.50 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3676639 07/12/2021 20210806 1,113.00 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3676642 07/12/2021 20210806 636.00 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3676643 07/12/2021 20210806 752.00 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3676637 07/12/2021 20210806 2,941.50 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3676641 07/12/2021 20210806 20,426.00 CHECK 463368 TOTAL: 27,580.50 463369 08/06/2021 PRTD 129079 DRAIN KING INC 108915 06/11/2021 20210806 245.00 CHECK 463369 TOTAL: 245.00 463370 08/06/2021 PRTD 102259 EASY PICKER GOLF PRODUCTS INC 0163795-IN 07/14/2021 20210806 1,763.43 CHECK 463370 TOTAL: 1,763.43 463371 08/06/2021 PRTD 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 843784 07/08/2021 20210806 47.60 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 843745 07/08/2021 20210806 77.35 CHECK 463371 TOTAL: 124.95 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 10 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463372 08/06/2021 PRTD 100049 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES 87370 07/12/2021 20210806 4,080.00 CHECK 463372 TOTAL: 4,080.00 463373 08/06/2021 PRTD 160062 ELM CREEK BREWING COMPANY E-1196 07/16/2021 20210806 204.00 ELM CREEK BREWING COMPANY E-1195 07/16/2021 20210806 136.00 ELM CREEK BREWING COMPANY E-1197 07/16/2021 20210806 136.00 CHECK 463373 TOTAL: 476.00 463374 08/06/2021 PRTD 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 2266753 07/08/2021 20210806 121.48 CHECK 463374 TOTAL: 121.48 463375 08/06/2021 PRTD 137540 EMSL ANALYTICAL INC 35150633 07/12/2021 20210806 364.00 CHECK 463375 TOTAL: 364.00 463376 08/06/2021 PRTD 134730 EXPLORE EDINA 20070 07/28/2021 20210806 41,248.57 CHECK 463376 TOTAL: 41,248.57 463377 08/06/2021 PRTD 147181 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-4009 07/20/2021 20210806 390.00 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-4010 07/20/2021 20210806 390.00 CHECK 463377 TOTAL: 780.00 463378 08/06/2021 PRTD 103600 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0477568 07/12/2021 20210806 429.76 CHECK 463378 TOTAL: 429.76 463379 08/06/2021 PRTD 141837 DAIOHS USA INC 562019 07/09/2021 20210806 254.95 DAIOHS USA INC 562995 07/12/2021 20210806 1,102.10 CHECK 463379 TOTAL: 1,357.05 463380 08/06/2021 PRTD 142334 FURTHER 008816 07/21 07/07/2021 20210806 993.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 11 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 463380 TOTAL: 993.00 463381 08/06/2021 PRTD 102456 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1394749 07/07/2021 20210806 193.86 CHECK 463381 TOTAL: 193.86 463382 08/06/2021 PRTD 160159 GARB ALTERNATIVE SPORTSWEAR INC 134913 07/06/2021 20210806 450.35 CHECK 463382 TOTAL: 450.35 463383 08/06/2021 PRTD 151316 GARDENEER 31458 07/01/2021 20210806 2,828.58 CHECK 463383 TOTAL: 2,828.58 463384 08/06/2021 PRTD 144412 WINEBOW MN00097823 07/20/2021 20210806 431.50 WINEBOW MN00097846 07/20/2021 20210806 792.50 WINEBOW MN00097817 07/20/2021 20210806 1,554.00 WINEBOW MN00098097 07/22/2021 20210806 -7.50 CHECK 463384 TOTAL: 2,770.50 463385 08/06/2021 PRTD 129248 GROTH, CHRISTOPHER 6653 07/12/2021 20210806 6,250.00 GROTH, CHRISTOPHER 6651 07/12/2021 20210806 1,500.00 CHECK 463385 TOTAL: 7,750.00 463386 08/06/2021 PRTD 102426 HALE, WILLIAM 21CLP824 07/26/2021 20210806 250.00 CHECK 463386 TOTAL: 250.00 463387 08/06/2021 PRTD 151168 HAMMER SPORTS LLC 468 07/11/2021 20210806 118.00 CHECK 463387 TOTAL: 118.00 463388 08/06/2021 PRTD 100797 HAWKINS INC 4981465 07/12/2021 20210806 12,070.41 CHECK 463388 TOTAL: 12,070.41 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 12 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463389 08/06/2021 PRTD 101503 HCT 20342 07/30/2021 20210806 2,530.11 CHECK 463389 TOTAL: 2,530.11 463390 08/06/2021 PRTD 103085 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000168835 07/01/2021 20210806 218,904.97 CHECK 463390 TOTAL: 218,904.97 463391 08/06/2021 PRTD 143585 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 69908 07/27/2021 20210806 550.00 CHECK 463391 TOTAL: 550.00 463392 08/06/2021 PRTD 138173 HENRICKSEN 716032 07/11/2021 20210806 90.00 CHECK 463392 TOTAL: 90.00 463393 08/06/2021 PRTD 144652 HINDING, CHRISTIAN 21CLP826 07/26/2021 20210806 250.00 CHECK 463393 TOTAL: 250.00 463394 08/06/2021 PRTD 102484 HIRSHFIELDS PAINT MANUFACTURING I 0010994-IN 07/06/2021 20210806 839.76 CHECK 463394 TOTAL: 839.76 463395 08/06/2021 PRTD 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC 427918 07/20/2021 20210806 1,725.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 427916 07/20/2021 20210806 25.20 HOHENSTEINS INC 427914 07/20/2021 20210806 736.50 HOHENSTEINS INC 427915 07/20/2021 20210806 30.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 427923 07/20/2021 20210806 2,562.30 HOHENSTEINS INC 427922 07/20/2021 20210806 170.40 HOHENSTEINS INC 426016 07/13/2021 20210806 2,468.70 HOHENSTEINS INC 429864 07/26/2021 20210806 -14.25 CHECK 463395 TOTAL: 7,703.85 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 13 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463396 08/06/2021 PRTD 151094 HOPKINS SPORTS CAMPS LLC 20630 07/06/2021 20210806 712.00 CHECK 463396 TOTAL: 712.00 463397 08/06/2021 PRTD 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 102913 07/14/2021 20210806 1,200.80 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 102902 07/14/2021 20210806 313.50 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 102910 07/14/2021 20210806 406.50 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 103113 07/20/2021 20210806 972.10 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 103115 07/20/2021 20210806 243.00 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 103112 07/20/2021 20210806 402.60 CHECK 463397 TOTAL: 3,538.50 463398 08/06/2021 PRTD 146407 INGCO INTERNATIONAL 300-022 07/06/2021 20210806 200.00 CHECK 463398 TOTAL: 200.00 463399 08/06/2021 PRTD 141969 ESPRESSO SERVICES, INC MN3101581 07/06/2021 20210806 630.00 CHECK 463399 TOTAL: 630.00 463400 08/06/2021 PRTD 160183 INTERSTATE SERVICES INC. 122991 06/14/2021 20210806 200.00 CHECK 463400 TOTAL: 200.00 463401 08/06/2021 PRTD 123036 INVER HILLS COMMUNITY BAND 21CLP829 07/26/2021 20210806 150.00 CHECK 463401 TOTAL: 150.00 463402 08/06/2021 PRTD 150898 INVICTUS BREWING INC 3228 07/19/2021 20210806 155.00 CHECK 463402 TOTAL: 155.00 463403 08/06/2021 PRTD 102157 JEFF ELLIS AND ASSOCIATES INC 20103246 07/06/2021 20210806 900.00 JEFF ELLIS AND ASSOCIATES INC 20103330 07/08/2021 20210806 805.00 JEFF ELLIS AND ASSOCIATES INC 20103334 07/08/2021 20210806 100.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 14 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 463403 TOTAL: 1,805.00 463404 08/06/2021 PRTD 160185 JENNINGS, MATTHEW H 21CLP0707 07/12/2021 20210806 150.00 CHECK 463404 TOTAL: 150.00 463405 08/06/2021 PRTD 100828 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC EQUIP OPS-Adjustment07/25/2021 20210806 137.40 CHECK 463405 TOTAL: 137.40 463406 08/06/2021 PRTD 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC 185595 07/06/2021 20210806 185.00 CHECK 463406 TOTAL: 185.00 463407 08/06/2021 PRTD 160041 JINX TEA, LLC 1399 07/21/2021 20210806 123.80 CHECK 463407 TOTAL: 123.80 463408 08/06/2021 PRTD 100741 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3201383 07/21/2021 20210806 109.50 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3201386 07/21/2021 20210806 109.50 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3201387 07/21/2021 20210806 934.10 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3201382 07/21/2021 20210806 1,559.95 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3201388 07/21/2021 20210806 489.10 CHECK 463408 TOTAL: 3,202.15 463409 08/06/2021 PRTD 100835 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3486358 07/22/2021 20210806 1,348.80 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3486360 07/22/2021 20210806 1,256.95 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3486359 07/22/2021 20210806 106.80 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3466361 07/22/2021 20210806 1,022.20 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 310738 07/01/2021 20210806 -450.00 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3403397-2 02/06/2020 20210806 -335.74 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 499659-1 12/04/2020 20210806 -44.58 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 15 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 463409 TOTAL: 2,904.43 463410 08/06/2021 PRTD 100835 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6242173 07/22/2021 20210806 1,351.73 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6242174 07/22/2021 20210806 1,229.58 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6242175 07/22/2021 20210806 73.19 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6242176 07/22/2021 20210806 1,331.75 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6242177 07/22/2021 20210806 1,255.81 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6242178 07/22/2021 20210806 324.76 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6242179 07/22/2021 20210806 144.18 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6242183 07/22/2021 20210806 467.71 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6242187 07/22/2021 20210806 212.02 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6242185 07/22/2021 20210806 162.38 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6242184 07/22/2021 20210806 1,086.04 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 636511 07/09/2021 20210806 -5.96 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 602446 03/17/2020 20210806 -86.16 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 607491 06/11/2020 20210806 -24.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 614808 09/10/2020 20210806 -112.18 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 614856 09/11/2020 20210806 -32.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 616081 09/25/2020 20210806 -57.19 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6138012 12/28/2020 20210806 113.19 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6122166 11/12/2020 20210806 21.42 CHECK 463410 TOTAL: 7,456.27 463411 08/06/2021 PRTD 100835 WINE MERCHANTS 738489 07/02/2021 20210806 -12.51 WINE MERCHANTS 738490 07/02/2021 20210806 -5.08 WINE MERCHANTS 7339253 07/22/2021 20210806 4,061.88 WINE MERCHANTS 7339254 07/22/2021 20210806 122.38 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 16 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET WINE MERCHANTS 7339255 07/22/2021 20210806 3,829.42 WINE MERCHANTS 7339256 07/22/2021 20210806 1,044.99 WINE MERCHANTS 7339261 07/22/2021 20210806 367.14 WINE MERCHANTS 7339260 07/22/2021 20210806 1,226.71 WINE MERCHANTS 7339259 07/22/2021 20210806 157.19 WINE MERCHANTS 7339258 07/22/2021 20210806 24.19 CHECK 463411 TOTAL: 10,816.31 463412 08/06/2021 PRTD 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1845961 07/15/2021 20210806 291.57 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1845639 07/15/2021 20210806 123.57 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1820942-1 06/10/2021 20210806 140.68 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1845657 07/15/2021 20210806 1,897.70 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 156907 07/23/2021 20210806 -8.05 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850611 07/22/2021 20210806 220.46 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850612 07/22/2021 20210806 835.21 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850614 07/22/2021 20210806 1,305.52 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850615 07/22/2021 20210806 1,188.09 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850616 07/22/2021 20210806 266.38 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 6223109-1 06/17/2021 20210806 58.03 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850620 07/22/2021 20210806 3,236.90 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850621 07/22/2021 20210806 270.12 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850622 07/22/2021 20210806 203.31 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850623 07/22/2021 20210806 199.03 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850609 07/22/2021 20210806 532.38 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850631 07/22/2021 20210806 322.45 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850624 07/22/2021 20210806 3,859.51 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850625 07/22/2021 20210806 1,495.11 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 17 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850626 07/22/2021 20210806 1,581.33 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850629 07/22/2021 20210806 647.77 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850627 07/22/2021 20210806 1,414.75 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850628 07/22/2021 20210806 266.38 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850630 07/22/2021 20210806 1,451.90 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850632 07/22/2021 20210806 49.19 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850636 07/22/2021 20210806 759.82 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850618 07/22/2021 20210806 1,328.66 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850638 07/22/2021 20210806 2,483.31 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850640 07/22/2021 20210806 2,433.31 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850639 07/22/2021 20210806 871.69 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850637 07/22/2021 20210806 1,850.10 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850610 07/22/2021 20210806 948.57 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850613 07/22/2021 20210806 1,305.52 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1850635 07/22/2021 20210806 3,241.63 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 154773 07/09/2021 20210806 -14.16 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1235555 03/06/2019 20210806 416.38 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 532003 03/08/2019 20210806 -51.66 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 544758 05/23/2019 20210806 -11.64 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 553610 07/02/2019 20210806 -37.03 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 571444 10/08/2019 20210806 -36.85 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 574943 10/28/2019 20210806 -73.50 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 585238 12/31/2019 20210806 -112.68 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 587525 01/16/2020 20210806 -27.58 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 591539-1 02/13/2020 20210806 -3.33 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 592342-1 02/20/2020 20210806 -11.12 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 18 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 592343 02/20/2020 20210806 -7.47 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 109074 07/17/2020 20210806 -3.57 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 104103 06/12/2020 20210806 -11.03 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 113738 08/21/2020 20210806 -158.39 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1634579 10/22/2020 20210806 -223.45 CHECK 463412 TOTAL: 36,704.82 463413 08/06/2021 PRTD 141864 JOSEPH E JOHNSON & SONS CONSTRUCT 1153 07/07/2021 20210806 19,744.90 JOSEPH E JOHNSON & SONS CONSTRUCT 1152 07/07/2021 20210806 9,676.11 CHECK 463413 TOTAL: 29,421.01 463414 08/06/2021 PRTD 103409 KELBRO COMPANY 2649162 07/17/2021 20210806 78.42 KELBRO COMPANY 2649165 07/17/2021 20210806 81.25 KELBRO COMPANY 2652167 07/22/2021 20210806 76.72 KELBRO COMPANY 2652166 07/22/2021 20210806 73.89 KELBRO COMPANY 2652253 07/22/2021 20210806 188.91 CHECK 463414 TOTAL: 499.19 463415 08/06/2021 PRTD 142207 KIESLER POLICE SUPPLY INC IN169776 07/01/2021 20210806 3,201.97 CHECK 463415 TOTAL: 3,201.97 463416 08/06/2021 PRTD 100944 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 133910 07/20/2021 20210806 89.25 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 133935 07/20/2021 20210806 1,302.50 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 133929 07/20/2021 20210806 943.25 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 133912 07/20/2021 20210806 89.25 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 133924 07/20/2021 20210806 1,370.75 CHECK 463416 TOTAL: 3,795.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 19 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463417 08/06/2021 PRTD 151024 LA DONA SBC 4876 07/21/2021 20210806 146.00 CHECK 463417 TOTAL: 146.00 463418 08/06/2021 PRTD 139451 LANDBRIDGE ECOLOGICAL INC 529 06/30/2021 20210806 400.00 CHECK 463418 TOTAL: 400.00 463419 08/06/2021 PRTD 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9308592405 07/06/2021 20210806 37.93 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9308592406 07/06/2021 20210806 127.03 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9308599723 07/08/2021 20210806 63.22 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9308605699 07/11/2021 20210806 1,235.30 CHECK 463419 TOTAL: 1,463.48 463420 08/06/2021 PRTD 120033 LENCO INDUSTRIES INC 18152 07/28/2021 20210806 247.62 CHECK 463420 TOTAL: 247.62 463421 08/06/2021 PRTD 135867 LIBATION PROJECT 37375 07/20/2021 20210806 463.33 LIBATION PROJECT 37378 07/20/2021 20210806 191.00 CHECK 463421 TOTAL: 654.33 463422 08/06/2021 PRTD 101078 LUBE-TECH 272226 06/02/2021 20210806 -707.41 LUBE-TECH 2656974 07/07/2021 20210806 2,901.02 CHECK 463422 TOTAL: 2,193.61 463423 08/06/2021 PRTD 141916 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 34588 07/20/2021 20210806 250.35 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 34587 07/20/2021 20210806 250.35 CHECK 463423 TOTAL: 500.70 463424 08/06/2021 PRTD 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT LLC P05401 07/09/2021 20210806 79.90 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT LLC P05403 07/09/2021 20210806 119.80 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 20 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 463424 TOTAL: 199.70 463425 08/06/2021 PRTD 141215 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV615244 07/20/2021 20210806 366.96 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV615272 07/20/2021 20210806 161.46 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV615996 07/21/2021 20210806 217.50 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV616004 07/21/2021 20210806 133.50 CHECK 463425 TOTAL: 879.42 463426 08/06/2021 PRTD 101254 MCCORMICK, CAROL 21CLP812 07/26/2021 20210806 250.00 CHECK 463426 TOTAL: 250.00 463427 08/06/2021 PRTD 130477 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 590236 07/21/2021 20210806 1,106.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 590235 07/21/2021 20210806 110.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 590238 07/21/2021 20210806 707.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 590237 07/21/2021 20210806 110.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 590233 07/21/2021 20210806 148.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 590234 07/21/2021 20210806 530.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 531221 03/26/2020 20210806 325.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 590540 07/22/2021 20210806 768.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 583908 06/09/2021 20210806 58.33 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 580073 05/12/2021 20210806 -70.00 CHECK 463427 TOTAL: 3,792.33 463428 08/06/2021 PRTD 101483 MENARDS 23135 06/23/2021 20210806 123.84 CHECK 463428 TOTAL: 123.84 463429 08/06/2021 PRTD 101483 MENARDS INC 42496 07/06/2021 20210806 54.44 MENARDS INC 42484 07/06/2021 20210806 2,798.73 MENARDS INC 42486 07/06/2021 20210806 180.72 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 21 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET MENARDS INC 42563 07/07/2021 20210806 48.82 MENARDS INC 42684 07/09/2021 20210806 62.25 MENARDS INC 42668 07/09/2021 20210806 43.96 CHECK 463429 TOTAL: 3,188.92 463430 08/06/2021 PRTD 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL JULY 2020 SAC REPORT08/02/2021 20210806 9,840.60 CHECK 463430 TOTAL: 9,840.60 463431 08/06/2021 PRTD 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD LLC 524647 07/06/2021 20210806 50.82 METROPOLITAN FORD LLC 524652 07/07/2021 20210806 5.08 CHECK 463431 TOTAL: 55.90 463432 08/06/2021 PRTD 138732 TRADITION WINE & SPIRITS LLC 27278 07/20/2021 20210806 165.00 TRADITION WINE & SPIRITS LLC 27277 07/20/2021 20210806 489.00 CHECK 463432 TOTAL: 654.00 463433 08/06/2021 PRTD 104650 MICRO CENTER 8771095 07/06/2021 20210806 159.98 CHECK 463433 TOTAL: 159.98 463434 08/06/2021 PRTD 127062 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENANCE IN 180184147 07/11/2021 20210806 16.13 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENANCE IN 180184145 07/11/2021 20210806 5.38 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENANCE IN 1801184146 07/11/2021 20210806 21.51 CHECK 463434 TOTAL: 43.02 463435 08/06/2021 PRTD 128914 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 31410 07/08/2021 20210806 297.00 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 31411 07/08/2021 20210806 24.00 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 31416 07/09/2021 20210806 761.00 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 31430 07/10/2021 20210806 102.71 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 22 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 463435 TOTAL: 1,184.71 463436 08/06/2021 PRTD 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC E-23688 07/20/2021 20210806 271.87 MODIST BREWING LLC E-23686 07/20/2021 20210806 168.75 MODIST BREWING LLC E-23687 07/20/2021 20210806 157.50 CHECK 463436 TOTAL: 598.12 463437 08/06/2021 PRTD 123649 MONROE TOWMASTER LLC 440723 07/07/2021 20210806 82.89 CHECK 463437 TOTAL: 82.89 463438 08/06/2021 PRTD 129657 MS INDUSTRIES INC 308374 07/06/2021 20210806 992.49 CHECK 463438 TOTAL: 992.49 463439 08/06/2021 PRTD 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1312139-00 07/07/2021 20210806 218.31 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1310939-02 07/07/2021 20210806 89.56 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1312145-00 07/08/2021 20210806 43.10 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1300754-00 07/09/2021 20210806 1,015.80 CHECK 463439 TOTAL: 1,366.77 463440 08/06/2021 PRTD 101390 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES INC IN1597321 07/08/2021 20210806 54.40 CHECK 463440 TOTAL: 54.40 463441 08/06/2021 PRTD 160072 NORTHERN AIR CORPORATION FC 20-17 #1 07/12/2021 20210806 30,950.05 CHECK 463441 TOTAL: 30,950.05 463442 08/06/2021 PRTD 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 3599-130520 07/07/2021 20210806 362.36 CHECK 463442 TOTAL: 362.36 463443 08/06/2021 PRTD 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 176205 07/21/2021 20210806 706.00 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 176204 07/21/2021 20210806 122.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 23 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET NEW FRANCE WINE CO 176206 07/21/2021 20210806 638.00 CHECK 463443 TOTAL: 1,466.00 463444 08/06/2021 PRTD 100926 BLUETARP FINANCIAL INC 0035077214 07/06/2021 20210806 153.94 CHECK 463444 TOTAL: 153.94 463445 08/06/2021 PRTD 136562 NORTHLAND RECREATION LLC 2339 05/27/2021 20210806 4,191.00 CHECK 463445 TOTAL: 4,191.00 463446 08/06/2021 PRTD 105901 OERTEL ARCHITECTS 20-23.5 07/08/2021 20210806 6,023.79 CHECK 463446 TOTAL: 6,023.79 463447 08/06/2021 PRTD 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 175661346001 06/04/2021 20210806 229.29 CHECK 463447 TOTAL: 229.29 463448 08/06/2021 PRTD 141965 OMNI BREWING COMPANY LLC E-10284 07/19/2021 20210806 140.00 OMNI BREWING COMPANY LLC E-10285 07/19/2021 20210806 110.00 CHECK 463448 TOTAL: 250.00 463449 08/06/2021 PRTD 999995 AJ Residential LLC ED178376-REFUND-1 07/27/2021 20210806 2,000.00 CHECK 463449 TOTAL: 2,000.00 463450 08/06/2021 PRTD 999995 CORT LUNDEEN ED187752-REFUND 07/27/2021 20210806 2,000.00 CHECK 463450 TOTAL: 2,000.00 463451 08/06/2021 PRTD 999995 Kothrade Sewer, Water & Excavatin ED179549-REFUND 07/28/2021 20210806 2,500.00 CHECK 463451 TOTAL: 2,500.00 463452 08/06/2021 PRTD 999995 LDK Builders ED179505-REFUND 07/28/2021 20210806 10,000.00 CHECK 463452 TOTAL: 10,000.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 24 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463453 08/06/2021 PRTD 999995 LDK Builders ED184315-REFUND 07/28/2021 20210806 2,500.00 CHECK 463453 TOTAL: 2,500.00 463454 08/06/2021 PRTD 999995 LDK Builders ED183583-REFUND 07/28/2021 20210806 9,880.00 CHECK 463454 TOTAL: 9,880.00 463455 08/06/2021 PRTD 999995 NR PROPERTIES ED183207-REFUND 07/28/2021 20210806 2,500.00 CHECK 463455 TOTAL: 2,500.00 463456 08/06/2021 PRTD 999995 PERSONAL PRIDE CONSTRUCTION ED180471-REFUND 07/27/2021 20210806 10,000.00 CHECK 463456 TOTAL: 10,000.00 463457 08/06/2021 PRTD 999995 TJB HOMES INC ED183249-REFUND 07/28/2021 20210806 2,500.00 CHECK 463457 TOTAL: 2,500.00 463458 08/06/2021 PRTD 999995 TURNER BROTHERS ED188209-REFUND 07/27/2021 20210806 2,500.00 CHECK 463458 TOTAL: 2,500.00 463459 08/06/2021 PRTD 999994 Fer-Pal Construction 20338 07/30/2021 20210806 1,750.00 CHECK 463459 TOTAL: 1,750.00 463460 08/06/2021 PRTD 999996 BRYAN FRANCIS 20494 08/02/2021 20210806 96.78 CHECK 463460 TOTAL: 96.78 463461 08/06/2021 PRTD 999996 DALY, HEIDI LB REFUND DALY 07/30/2021 20210806 80.00 CHECK 463461 TOTAL: 80.00 463462 08/06/2021 PRTD 999996 ELICE CHAMBERS 20115 07/28/2021 20210806 100.00 CHECK 463462 TOTAL: 100.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 25 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463463 08/06/2021 PRTD 999996 FRANDRUP, KATIE LB REF FRANDRUP 07/23/2021 20210806 80.00 CHECK 463463 TOTAL: 80.00 463464 08/06/2021 PRTD 999996 FRANK, BRANDEE CLASS REF FRANK 07/23/2021 20210806 220.00 CHECK 463464 TOTAL: 220.00 463465 08/06/2021 PRTD 999996 Howard, Amy 1351859 07/27/2021 20210806 235.00 CHECK 463465 TOTAL: 235.00 463466 08/06/2021 PRTD 999996 Jog, Kasturi 1361357 07/27/2021 20210806 235.00 CHECK 463466 TOTAL: 235.00 463467 08/06/2021 PRTD 999996 MAHONEY, JOE LB REF MAHONEY 07/23/2021 20210806 80.00 CHECK 463467 TOTAL: 80.00 463468 08/06/2021 PRTD 999996 Mclain, Carolyn 1350027 07/27/2021 20210806 235.00 CHECK 463468 TOTAL: 235.00 463469 08/06/2021 PRTD 999996 Miller, Alisha 1227611-REFUND 08/02/2021 20210806 241.93 CHECK 463469 TOTAL: 241.93 463470 08/06/2021 PRTD 999996 ROSS, ADAM CLASS REF ROSS 07/23/2021 20210806 120.00 CHECK 463470 TOTAL: 120.00 463471 08/06/2021 PRTD 999996 Skubic, Mark 220000119078-REFUND 07/30/2021 20210806 134.41 CHECK 463471 TOTAL: 134.41 463472 08/06/2021 PRTD 999996 STAN BELTOWSKY 19613 07/26/2021 20210806 569.88 CHECK 463472 TOTAL: 569.88 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 26 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463473 08/06/2021 PRTD 999996 Tieman, Patricia Tieman 07/27/2021 20210806 22.55 CHECK 463473 TOTAL: 22.55 463474 08/06/2021 PRTD 999996 ZHANG KAINING 20189 07/29/2021 20210806 60.00 CHECK 463474 TOTAL: 60.00 463475 08/06/2021 PRTD 999997 SARAH OHLE 20001 07/27/2021 20210806 200.13 CHECK 463475 TOTAL: 200.13 463476 08/06/2021 PRTD 999997 THOMAS PELTOLA 19305 07/21/2021 20210806 30.00 CHECK 463476 TOTAL: 30.00 463477 08/06/2021 PRTD 104895 JDS AND WMK INC 121822 06/14/2021 20210806 253.90 CHECK 463477 TOTAL: 253.90 463478 08/06/2021 PRTD 129485 PAPCO INC 221516 07/12/2021 20210806 139.19 CHECK 463478 TOTAL: 139.19 463479 08/06/2021 PRTD 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 50923259 07/21/2021 20210806 1,423.68 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 51691151 07/21/2021 20210806 1,027.30 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 52042607 07/21/2021 20210806 415.00 CHECK 463479 TOTAL: 2,865.98 463480 08/06/2021 PRTD 149249 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-109684 07/22/2021 20210806 192.00 CHECK 463480 TOTAL: 192.00 463481 08/06/2021 PRTD 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 7142390 07/08/2021 20210806 96.55 CHECK 463481 TOTAL: 96.55 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 27 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463482 08/06/2021 PRTD 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 210538128 07/09/2021 20210806 505.56 CHECK 463482 TOTAL: 505.56 463483 08/06/2021 PRTD 102728 PRECISION LANDSCAPE AND TREE, INC 83316 07/09/2021 20210806 2,000.00 CHECK 463483 TOTAL: 2,000.00 463484 08/06/2021 PRTD 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC 318236478 07/06/2021 20210806 62.49 CHECK 463484 TOTAL: 62.49 463485 08/06/2021 PRTD 106322 SCHENCK, DAVID 158800 07/07/2021 20210806 341.55 SCHENCK, DAVID 158803 07/07/2021 20210806 333.27 SCHENCK, DAVID 158802 07/07/2021 20210806 854.84 CHECK 463485 TOTAL: 1,529.66 463486 08/06/2021 PRTD 143618 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-25128 07/20/2021 20210806 457.00 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-25129 07/20/2021 20210806 252.00 CHECK 463486 TOTAL: 709.00 463487 08/06/2021 PRTD 138267 QUALITY LOCKSMITH INC QLS20454 07/08/2021 20210806 285.00 CHECK 463487 TOTAL: 285.00 463488 08/06/2021 PRTD 160142 QUINLIVAN & HUGHES, PA 150577 DJE 07/12/2021 20210806 2,491.00 CHECK 463488 TOTAL: 2,491.00 463489 08/06/2021 PRTD 144351 REHDER, MARK 188 07/07/2021 20210806 650.63 CHECK 463489 TOTAL: 650.63 463490 08/06/2021 PRTD 125936 REINDERS INC 3081064-00 07/07/2021 20210806 3,180.00 CHECK 463490 TOTAL: 3,180.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 28 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463491 08/06/2021 PRTD 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 82530 07/07/2021 20210806 1,992.75 CHECK 463491 TOTAL: 1,992.75 463492 08/06/2021 PRTD 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 1928567644 07/07/2021 20210806 39.97 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 1928568928 07/09/2021 20210806 25.97 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 1928568946 07/09/2021 20210806 296.97 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 1928569885 07/12/2021 20210806 305.94 CHECK 463492 TOTAL: 668.85 463493 08/06/2021 PRTD 102011 RIVER CITY JAZZ ORCHESTRA 21CLP823 07/26/2021 20210806 150.00 CHECK 463493 TOTAL: 150.00 463494 08/06/2021 PRTD 129492 ROCHESTER CONCRETE PRODUCTS LLC 263655 07/09/2021 20210806 437.20 CHECK 463494 TOTAL: 437.20 463495 08/06/2021 PRTD 101659 ROLLINS INC 213158343 07/06/2021 20210806 142.36 CHECK 463495 TOTAL: 142.36 463496 08/06/2021 PRTD 143208 SECURIAN ASSET MANAGEMENT 188520 07/09/2021 20210806 8,655.65 CHECK 463496 TOTAL: 8,655.65 463497 08/06/2021 PRTD 132210 RUSCIANO GROUP 66870 07/01/2021 20210806 755.00 CHECK 463497 TOTAL: 755.00 463498 08/06/2021 PRTD 134643 SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUN SALES000000006859 06/30/2021 20210806 960.00 CHECK 463498 TOTAL: 960.00 463499 08/06/2021 PRTD 103249 SHANNON, JIM 21CLP0824 07/26/2021 20210806 150.00 CHECK 463499 TOTAL: 150.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 29 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463500 08/06/2021 PRTD 100995 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 407790 07/12/2021 20210806 1,123.54 CHECK 463500 TOTAL: 1,123.54 463501 08/06/2021 PRTD 100995 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 407784 07/12/2021 20210806 3,706.78 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 407887 07/12/2021 20210806 11,361.86 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 407883 07/12/2021 20210806 12,244.94 CHECK 463501 TOTAL: 27,313.58 463502 08/06/2021 PRTD 120784 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 16292 07/06/2021 20210806 382.50 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 16243 07/08/2021 20210806 181.60 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 16317 07/08/2021 20210806 37.89 CHECK 463502 TOTAL: 601.99 463503 08/06/2021 PRTD 101000 RJM PRINTING INC 116769012 07/08/2021 20210806 85.78 RJM PRINTING INC 116770011 07/08/2021 20210806 85.78 CHECK 463503 TOTAL: 171.56 463504 08/06/2021 PRTD 127878 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2104251 07/21/2021 20210806 1,829.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2104250 07/21/2021 20210806 172.85 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2104249 07/21/2021 20210806 145.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2104257 07/21/2021 20210806 305.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2104252 07/21/2021 20210806 145.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2104253 07/21/2021 20210806 168.93 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2104256 07/21/2021 20210806 172.85 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2104254 07/21/2021 20210806 228.00 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2104255 07/21/2021 20210806 147.74 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2104247 07/21/2021 20210806 144.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2104245 07/21/2021 20210806 480.45 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 30 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2104246 07/21/2021 20210806 1,304.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2104244 07/21/2021 20210806 96.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2104248 07/21/2021 20210806 436.80 CHECK 463504 TOTAL: 5,780.42 463505 08/06/2021 PRTD 101023 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSI 202112 07/07/2021 20210806 11,043.00 CHECK 463505 TOTAL: 11,043.00 463506 08/06/2021 PRTD 134700 SPOK INC E0319246S 07/07/2021 20210806 130.38 CHECK 463506 TOTAL: 130.38 463507 08/06/2021 PRTD 129360 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY SOLUT 6001303955 07/06/2021 20210806 1,054.68 CHECK 463507 TOTAL: 1,054.68 463508 08/06/2021 PRTD 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 41159 07/21/2021 20210806 225.00 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 41158 07/21/2021 20210806 525.00 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 41160 07/21/2021 20210806 153.00 CHECK 463508 TOTAL: 903.00 463509 08/06/2021 PRTD 101015 STREICHERS INC I1512619 07/09/2021 20210806 29.08 STREICHERS INC I1516628 08/02/2021 20210806 163.86 STREICHERS INC I1516622 08/02/2021 20210806 100.86 CHECK 463509 TOTAL: 293.80 463510 08/06/2021 PRTD 139302 STRONG TOWNS 3914 07/06/2021 20210806 675.00 CHECK 463510 TOTAL: 675.00 463511 08/06/2021 PRTD 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 161392 07/08/2021 20210806 74.71 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 31 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 463511 TOTAL: 74.71 463512 08/06/2021 PRTD 113841 SUMMIT 1515033-2 07/27/2021 20210806 13.90 CHECK 463512 TOTAL: 13.90 463513 08/06/2021 PRTD 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC DB 3042232 07/06/2021 20210806 665.00 CHECK 463513 TOTAL: 665.00 463514 08/06/2021 PRTD 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA INC 347553222 07/07/2021 20210806 1,047.57 SYSCO MINNESOTA INC 347552101 07/06/2021 20210806 514.40 SYSCO MINNESOTA INC 347555971 07/09/2021 20210806 552.09 SYSCO MINNESOTA INC 347560218 07/12/2021 20210806 1,251.05 CHECK 463514 TOTAL: 3,365.11 463515 08/06/2021 PRTD 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY INC 56473-00 07/06/2021 20210806 143.82 CHECK 463515 TOTAL: 143.82 463516 08/06/2021 PRTD 150864 THOMAS J RUSTAO May 1 to June 30 21 07/01/2021 20210806 129.00 CHECK 463516 TOTAL: 129.00 463517 08/06/2021 PRTD 103277 TITAN MACHINERY INC 15750529 GP 07/07/2021 20210806 11,532.00 TITAN MACHINERY INC 15766953 07/12/2021 20210806 284.14 CHECK 463517 TOTAL: 11,816.14 463518 08/06/2021 PRTD 101038 TOLL COMPANY 10413874 07/08/2021 20210806 217.07 CHECK 463518 TOTAL: 217.07 463519 08/06/2021 PRTD 134673 TOTAL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INC S1299 07/08/2021 20210806 292.00 TOTAL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INC PM4097 07/08/2021 20210806 2,554.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 32 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 463519 TOTAL: 2,846.00 463520 08/06/2021 PRTD 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO 50056 07/12/2021 20210806 200.00 CHECK 463520 TOTAL: 200.00 463521 08/06/2021 PRTD 103973 ULINE INC 135910354 07/08/2021 20210806 172.15 CHECK 463521 TOTAL: 172.15 463522 08/06/2021 PRTD 100689 ULTIMATE SAFETY CONCEPTS INC 195234 07/09/2021 20210806 1,783.27 CHECK 463522 TOTAL: 1,783.27 463523 08/06/2021 PRTD 130874 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA) IN 192208620-005 07/08/2021 20210806 4,500.00 CHECK 463523 TOTAL: 4,500.00 463524 08/06/2021 PRTD 140009 US KIDS GOLF LLC IN2020828 07/07/2021 20210806 145.15 US KIDS GOLF LLC IN2020832 07/07/2021 20210806 145.15 CHECK 463524 TOTAL: 290.30 463525 08/06/2021 PRTD 103500 VALLEY PAVING INC ENG 21-2 #3 07/09/2021 20210806 1,358,883.76 CHECK 463525 TOTAL: 1,358,883.76 463526 08/06/2021 PRTD 101058 VAN PAPER COMPANY 580128-00 07/09/2021 20210806 130.82 VAN PAPER COMPANY 581104 CM 07/16/2021 20210806 -50.49 CHECK 463526 TOTAL: 80.33 463527 08/06/2021 PRTD 160182 AMSA INC 14070 07/12/2021 20210806 5,670.60 CHECK 463527 TOTAL: 5,670.60 463528 08/06/2021 PRTD 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES 62322 07/08/2021 20210806 162.90 CHECK 463528 TOTAL: 162.90 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 33 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463529 08/06/2021 PRTD 160088 VINIFERA IMPORTS 325822 06/30/2021 20210806 209.00 CHECK 463529 TOTAL: 209.00 463530 08/06/2021 PRTD 119454 VINOCOPIA INC 0283446-IN 07/22/2021 20210806 162.50 VINOCOPIA INC 0283447-IN 07/22/2021 20210806 66.50 VINOCOPIA INC 0283435-IN 07/22/2021 20210806 1,434.67 VINOCOPIA INC 0283379-IN 07/22/2021 20210806 304.50 VINOCOPIA INC 0283402-IN 07/22/2021 20210806 451.50 VINOCOPIA INC 0283401-IN 07/22/2021 20210806 304.50 VINOCOPIA INC 0283403-IN 07/22/2021 20210806 314.50 VINOCOPIA INC 0283445-IN 07/22/2021 20210806 771.25 CHECK 463530 TOTAL: 3,809.92 463531 08/06/2021 PRTD 133629 VON HANSONS MEATS SHAKOPEE INC 117453 07/07/2021 20210806 243.00 CHECK 463531 TOTAL: 243.00 463532 08/06/2021 PRTD 101328 WALBRIDGE, DAVID 21CLP817 07/26/2021 20210806 250.00 CHECK 463532 TOTAL: 250.00 463533 08/06/2021 PRTD 151681 WALKER LAWN CARE INC 8716 07/06/2021 20210806 5,109.00 CHECK 463533 TOTAL: 5,109.00 463534 08/06/2021 PRTD 135181 WATERFORD OIL CO INC 129967 07/07/2021 20210806 1,005.95 CHECK 463534 TOTAL: 1,005.95 463535 08/06/2021 PRTD 146802 WHITE BEAR MITSUBISHI EDINA99157 08/04/2021 22100027 20210806 32,342.00 WHITE BEAR MITSUBISHI EDINA98489 08/04/2021 22100027 20210806 32,342.00 CHECK 463535 TOTAL: 64,684.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 34 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463536 08/06/2021 PRTD 101033 WINE COMPANY 178417 07/21/2021 20210806 1,834.32 WINE COMPANY 178418 07/21/2021 20210806 1,834.45 WINE COMPANY 178416 07/21/2021 20210806 2,000.71 CHECK 463536 TOTAL: 5,669.48 463537 08/06/2021 PRTD 130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 64569503 07/08/2021 20210806 4,397.08 CHECK 463537 TOTAL: 4,397.08 463538 08/06/2021 PRTD 124503 WINSUPPLY EDEN PRAIRIE MN CO 213287 01 07/12/2021 20210806 35.49 CHECK 463538 TOTAL: 35.49 463539 08/06/2021 PRTD 142162 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 2860 07/16/2021 20210806 480.90 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 2858 07/16/2021 20210806 367.50 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 2859 07/16/2021 20210806 51.00 CHECK 463539 TOTAL: 899.40 463540 08/06/2021 PRTD 127774 WORLDWIDE CELLARS INC R21-52901 07/20/2021 20210806 72.04 WORLDWIDE CELLARS INC R21-52902 07/20/2021 20210806 112.00 CHECK 463540 TOTAL: 184.04 463541 08/06/2021 PRTD 103410 WW GOETSCH ASSOCIATES INC 106448 07/06/2021 20210806 1,780.00 CHECK 463541 TOTAL: 1,780.00 463542 08/06/2021 PRTD 101103 WW GRAINGER 9954056249 07/06/2021 20210806 315.34 WW GRAINGER 9957363766 07/09/2021 20210806 15.23 CHECK 463542 TOTAL: 330.57 463543 08/06/2021 PRTD 130618 CHANHASSEN AUTO CENTERS LLC 21938 07/06/2021 20210806 2,901.06 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:07User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 35 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 463543 TOTAL: 2,901.06 463544 08/06/2021 PRTD 145029 ULTIMATE PARTNERS MINNESOTA LLC 7288 07/07/2021 20210806 252.00 CHECK 463544 TOTAL: 252.00 463545 08/06/2021 PRTD 101572 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 0185664-IN 07/08/2021 20210806 3,576.00 CHECK 463545 TOTAL: 3,576.00 NUMBER OF CHECKS 230 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** 2,231,317.65 COUNT AMOUNT TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS 230 2,231,317.65 *** GRAND TOTAL *** 2,231,317.65 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:44User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 4 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND SUB FUND DUE TO DUE FR 1000 General 9,022.254000 Capital Projects 9,022.259999 Pooled Cash Fund 18,044.50 TOTAL 18,044.50 18,044.50 ** END OF REPORT - Generated by Lonnia Jefferson ** City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/05/2021 13:44User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 1 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463546 08/06/2021 PRTD 139006 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 00000650316 04/02/2021 202108#2 9,022.25 CHECK 463546 TOTAL: 9,022.25 463547 08/06/2021 PRTD 139006 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 00000650317 04/02/2021 202108#2 9,022.25 CHECK 463547 TOTAL: 9,022.25 NUMBER OF CHECKS 2 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** 18,044.50 COUNT AMOUNT TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS 2 18,044.50 *** GRAND TOTAL *** 18,044.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 47 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND SUB FUND DUE TO DUE FR 1000 General 182,285.002300 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety 1,170.002500 Conservation & Sustainability 7,824.762600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 286.064000 Capital Projects 27,680.654200 Equipment Replacement 32,321.295100 Art Center 4,066.535200 Braemar Golf Course 21,666.385200 Braemar Golf Course 11,387.505300 Aquatic Center 38,931.735400 Edinborough Park 8,490.055500 Braemar Arena 28,111.355700 Centennial Lakes 4,255.535800 Liquor 183,766.475900 Utility Fund 42,396.975900 Utility Fund 41,676.405900 Utility Fund 118,673.675900 Utility Fund 783.106000 Risk Management 41,417.886100 Equipment Operations 37,589.126200 Information Technology 19,672.626300 Facilities Management 8,879.937100 PS Training Facility 218,404.197200 MN Task Force 1 28.789000 Payroll 17,934.169999 Pooled Cash Fund 1,099,700.12 TOTAL 1,099,700.12 1,099,700.12 ** END OF REPORT - Generated by Shirleng Tan Geil ** City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 1 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463548 08/13/2021 PRTD 144276 4 FRONT ENERGY SOLUTIONS INC ED190685-REFUND 08/05/2021 20210813 38.60 CHECK 463548 TOTAL: 38.60 463549 08/13/2021 PRTD 101971 UNISOURCE ACQUISITION CORPORATION 224963-001 07/14/2021 20210813 362.33 CHECK 463549 TOTAL: 362.33 463550 08/13/2021 PRTD 129458 ACME ELECTRIC MOTOR INC 8932715 07/14/2021 20210813 47.96 ACME ELECTRIC MOTOR INC 8932750 07/14/2021 20210813 43.00 ACME ELECTRIC MOTOR INC 8934060 07/15/2021 20210813 89.99 ACME ELECTRIC MOTOR INC 8940049 07/16/2021 20210813 338.00 CHECK 463550 TOTAL: 518.95 463551 08/13/2021 PRTD 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 910482409 03/15/2021 20210813 1,038.26 ACUSHNET COMPANY 911273052 06/19/2021 20210813 436.85 ACUSHNET COMPANY 911273207 06/19/2021 20210813 1,595.94 ACUSHNET COMPANY 911274864 06/20/2021 20210813 316.25 ACUSHNET COMPANY 911300807 06/21/2021 20210813 124.90 ACUSHNET COMPANY 911345271 06/30/2021 20210813 122.86 ACUSHNET COMPANY 911392808 07/08/2021 20210813 374.45 ACUSHNET COMPANY 911402956 07/09/2021 20210813 40.73 ACUSHNET COMPANY 911402803 07/09/2021 20210813 121.03 ACUSHNET COMPANY 911484615 07/20/2021 20210813 113.70 ACUSHNET COMPANY 911533948 07/27/2021 20210813 275.00 ACUSHNET COMPANY 911534275 07/27/2021 20210813 124.98 ACUSHNET COMPANY 300322678 07/29/2021 20210813 -2,172.00 CHECK 463551 TOTAL: 2,512.95 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 2 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463552 08/13/2021 PRTD 140318 ADVANCED ELEMENTS, INC 75453 07/13/2021 20210813 1,496.00 ADVANCED ELEMENTS, INC 75342 07/13/2021 20210813 2,868.12 ADVANCED ELEMENTS, INC 75322 07/13/2021 20210813 6,147.75 CHECK 463552 TOTAL: 10,511.87 463553 08/13/2021 PRTD 130792 AIRGAS NATIONAL CARBONATION 9115417479 07/15/2021 20210813 458.83 CHECK 463553 TOTAL: 458.83 463554 08/13/2021 PRTD 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC 4833 07/12/2021 20210813 7,000.00 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC 4022 05/27/2021 20210813 25,927.25 CHECK 463554 TOTAL: 32,927.25 463555 08/13/2021 PRTD 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1XV4-3CDW-DCGX 07/13/2021 20210813 28.78 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1HWV-6WVM-7PTX 07/13/2021 20210813 9.89 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1GH9-QHTN-966P 07/13/2021 20210813 53.16 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1F94-QKVM-FLD6 07/14/2021 20210813 235.93 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 11N3-NGG4-H37Y 07/14/2021 20210813 126.44 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1GH1-H9M1-KLW7 07/14/2021 20210813 10.89 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1XPD-4FYR-PDC3 07/15/2021 20210813 49.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1GNP-FC6G-1W1C 07/15/2021 20210813 91.53 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 14K6-QRNW-4PFW 07/15/2021 20210813 49.49 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1JM1-RTKL-6XTN 07/15/2021 20210813 152.40 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1DF1-YJFY-FCNT 07/16/2021 20210813 115.84 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1W1N-QGX3-JQQP 07/17/2021 20210813 679.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1GNP-FC6G-PRJ4 07/18/2021 20210813 104.62 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 17MD-XJXK-R4QL 07/18/2021 20210813 280.72 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1GXM-9RWQ-TLCV 07/18/2021 20210813 32.55 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 3 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 16VJ-C64X-34CF 07/19/2021 20210813 196.64 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1T71-HRDJ-4LTX 08/04/2021 20210813 32.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1T71-HRDJ-4LR1 08/04/2021 20210813 65.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 16YX-M7CP-T9XR 08/07/2021 20210813 114.96 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1DRC-D6QY-9QLL 08/08/2021 20210813 -6.99 CHECK 463555 TOTAL: 2,425.79 463556 08/13/2021 PRTD 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING INC 102834 07/15/2021 20210813 112.00 AQUA ENGINEERING INC 102858 07/16/2021 20210813 21.60 CHECK 463556 TOTAL: 133.60 463557 08/13/2021 PRTD 151441 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 1005097022 07/13/2021 20210813 178.95 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 1005096983 07/13/2021 20210813 204.61 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 1005098432 07/14/2021 20210813 385.70 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 1005098423 07/14/2021 20210813 385.70 CHECK 463557 TOTAL: 1,154.96 463558 08/13/2021 PRTD 106304 ASPEN MILLS INC 277413 07/16/2021 20210813 66.00 CHECK 463558 TOTAL: 66.00 463559 08/13/2021 PRTD 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA S1146354-080121 08/01/2021 20210813 270.15 CHECK 463559 TOTAL: 270.15 463560 08/13/2021 PRTD 101718 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 380065302 07/20/2021 20210813 40.74 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 380065289 07/20/2021 20210813 3.64 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 380065573 07/21/2021 20210813 7.41 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 380066380 07/27/2021 20210813 12.35 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 380066425 07/27/2021 20210813 4.94 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 380066438 07/27/2021 20210813 5.57 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 4 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 380066505 07/28/2021 20210813 67.48 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS OVERPAY-7/9/19 07/20/2021 20210813 -110.59 CHECK 463560 TOTAL: 31.54 463561 08/13/2021 PRTD 146345 CRP/TCC AA II EDINA LLC Open House 07/29/2021 20210813 50.00 CHECK 463561 TOTAL: 50.00 463562 08/13/2021 PRTD 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 170820 07/15/2021 20210813 143.90 CHECK 463562 TOTAL: 143.90 463563 08/13/2021 PRTD 104345 BARCLAY AUDIO 809212 07/13/2021 20210813 291.00 CHECK 463563 TOTAL: 291.00 463564 08/13/2021 PRTD 129624 BARNA GUZY & STEFFEN LTD 233291 06/30/2021 20210813 416.00 CHECK 463564 TOTAL: 416.00 463565 08/13/2021 PRTD 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23271869.00-2 07/13/2021 20210813 94,406.23 CHECK 463565 TOTAL: 94,406.23 463566 08/13/2021 PRTD 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0090514200 07/29/2021 20210813 3,926.80 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0103657500 07/29/2021 20210813 47.21 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0090535800 07/29/2021 20210813 684.40 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0090514300 07/29/2021 20210813 231.10 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0090514800 07/29/2021 20210813 361.65 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0090535400 07/29/2021 20210813 794.85 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0090514700 07/29/2021 20210813 3,815.30 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0103657600 07/29/2021 20210813 23.35 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0090535900 07/29/2021 20210813 794.85 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0090514500 07/29/2021 20210813 831.75 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 5 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 463566 TOTAL: 11,511.26 463567 08/13/2021 PRTD 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC 4987549 07/13/2021 20210813 702.00 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC 4988784 07/19/2021 20210813 546.00 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC 4988965 07/19/2021 20210813 858.00 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC 4988021 07/15/2021 20210813 702.00 CHECK 463567 TOTAL: 2,808.00 463568 08/13/2021 PRTD 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 848475 07/16/2021 20210813 697.23 CHECK 463568 TOTAL: 697.23 463569 08/13/2021 PRTD 130922 BI WORLDWIDE ME692822 06/17/2021 20210813 1,400.00 CHECK 463569 TOTAL: 1,400.00 463570 08/13/2021 PRTD 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 179386 07/20/2021 20210813 251.50 BOURGET IMPORTS 179388 07/20/2021 20210813 411.50 BOURGET IMPORTS 175789-1 07/14/2021 20210813 -1,131.25 BOURGET IMPORTS 179384 07/20/2021 20210813 736.50 BOURGET IMPORTS 179563 07/27/2021 20210813 105.75 BOURGET IMPORTS 179561 07/27/2021 20210813 187.18 BOURGET IMPORTS 179565 07/27/2021 20210813 778.50 CHECK 463570 TOTAL: 1,339.68 463571 08/13/2021 PRTD 117040 ALLIANCE PARTS TRUCK AND TRAILER 07P10452 07/19/2021 20210813 22.10 CHECK 463571 TOTAL: 22.10 463572 08/13/2021 PRTD 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION B258561 07/14/2021 20210813 5,242.50 CHECK 463572 TOTAL: 5,242.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 6 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463573 08/13/2021 PRTD 125155 BRAUN, MICHAEL 3111 07/14/2021 20210813 1,011.24 CHECK 463573 TOTAL: 1,011.24 463574 08/13/2021 PRTD 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340426249 07/28/2021 20210813 3,703.62 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340426251 07/28/2021 20210813 972.60 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340426247 07/28/2021 20210813 238.60 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340426248 07/28/2021 20210813 57.35 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340426250 07/28/2021 20210813 2,702.54 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340426236 07/28/2021 20210813 777.75 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340426234 07/28/2021 20210813 1,547.60 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340426235 07/28/2021 20210813 600.65 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340426232 07/28/2021 20210813 106.09 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340426231 07/28/2021 20210813 1,421.29 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340426233 07/28/2021 20210813 1,429.32 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 360132561 07/27/2021 20210813 -21.10 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340426252 07/28/2021 20210813 1,500.30 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340426253 07/28/2021 20210813 1,521.30 CHECK 463574 TOTAL: 16,557.91 463575 08/13/2021 PRTD 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 340446072 07/27/2021 20210813 4,907.70 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 340446071 07/29/2021 20210813 166.20 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 340446073 07/27/2021 20210813 1,651.50 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 340446074 07/27/2021 20210813 2,029.55 CHECK 463575 TOTAL: 8,754.95 463576 08/13/2021 PRTD 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 932916282 04/02/2021 20210813 937.60 CALLAWAY GOLF 933540892 07/13/2021 20210813 450.96 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 7 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CALLAWAY GOLF 933476647 06/28/2021 20210813 -1,046.39 CALLAWAY GOLF 933191249 05/13/2021 20210813 141.30 CHECK 463576 TOTAL: 483.47 463577 08/13/2021 PRTD 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2574866 07/23/2021 20210813 1,727.20 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2574868 07/23/2021 20210813 -23.70 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2574863 07/23/2021 20210813 234.00 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2574864 07/23/2021 20210813 1,450.75 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2573527 07/23/2021 20210813 127.49 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2574867 07/23/2021 20210813 58.50 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2576456 07/27/2021 20210813 2,787.00 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2576455 07/27/2021 20210813 199.50 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2576454 07/27/2021 20210813 28.00 CHECK 463577 TOTAL: 6,588.74 463578 08/13/2021 PRTD 151132 CARDNO INC 315476 07/13/2021 20210813 16,130.64 CHECK 463578 TOTAL: 16,130.64 463579 08/13/2021 PRTD 144675 CARLOS CREEK WINERY INC 21494 07/19/2021 20210813 72.00 CHECK 463579 TOTAL: 72.00 463580 08/13/2021 PRTD 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC G834545 07/13/2021 20210813 3,068.76 CDW GOVERNMENT INC G892911 07/14/2021 20210813 2,366.85 CDW GOVERNMENT INC H000254 07/16/2021 20210813 852.84 CHECK 463580 TOTAL: 6,288.45 463581 08/13/2021 PRTD 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY C2375379 07/13/2021 20210813 1,428.00 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY C2376048 07/14/2021 20210813 850.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 8 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 463581 TOTAL: 2,278.00 463582 08/13/2021 PRTD 103300 CENTER FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT 19003 07/19/2021 20210813 650.00 CHECK 463582 TOTAL: 650.00 463583 08/13/2021 PRTD 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 4090361231 07/19/2021 20210813 11.78 CINTAS CORPORATION 4090361278 07/19/2021 20210813 28.62 CINTAS CORPORATION 4090361260 07/19/2021 20210813 34.88 CINTAS CORPORATION 4090361288 07/19/2021 20210813 30.25 CINTAS CORPORATION 4090361313 07/19/2021 20210813 23.09 CINTAS CORPORATION 4090360914 07/19/2021 20210813 3.69 CINTAS CORPORATION 4090917391 07/23/2021 20210813 81.48 CINTAS CORPORATION 4091020205 07/26/2021 20210813 173.69 CHECK 463583 TOTAL: 387.48 463584 08/13/2021 PRTD 112542 BROOKLYN COMMUNITY BAND 21CLP816 07/26/2021 20210813 150.00 CHECK 463584 TOTAL: 150.00 463585 08/13/2021 PRTD 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS COM-2430 05/12/2021 20210813 100.00 CHECK 463585 TOTAL: 100.00 463586 08/13/2021 PRTD 120433 COMCAST HOLDINGS CORPORATION 0161120-7/21 07/26/2021 20210813 20.27 CHECK 463586 TOTAL: 20.27 463587 08/13/2021 PRTD 120433 COMCAST HOLDINGS CORPORATION 0177449-07/2021 07/25/2021 20210813 138.91 CHECK 463587 TOTAL: 138.91 463588 08/13/2021 PRTD 120433 COMCAST HOLDINGS CORPORATION 0373022-7/21 07/17/2021 20210813 33.79 CHECK 463588 TOTAL: 33.79 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 9 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463589 08/13/2021 PRTD 105981 TILLER CORPORATION 210715 07/15/2021 20210813 21,696.17 CHECK 463589 TOTAL: 21,696.17 463590 08/13/2021 PRTD 118805 DISCOUNT STEEL INC 5194851 07/13/2021 20210813 100.80 DISCOUNT STEEL INC 5195263 07/14/2021 20210813 12.75 CHECK 463590 TOTAL: 113.55 463591 08/13/2021 PRTD 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 79331 07/16/2021 20210813 456.50 CHECK 463591 TOTAL: 456.50 463592 08/13/2021 PRTD 104020 DALCO ENTERPRISES INC 3665580-1 07/01/2021 20210813 -320.40 DALCO ENTERPRISES INC 3804330 07/14/2021 20210813 311.82 DALCO ENTERPRISES INC 3806981 07/21/2021 20210813 1,301.08 CHECK 463592 TOTAL: 1,292.50 463593 08/13/2021 PRTD 121103 DIRECTV GROUP INC 016523692X210713 07/13/2021 20210813 105.23 CHECK 463593 TOTAL: 105.23 463594 08/13/2021 PRTD 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 844653 07/15/2021 20210813 35.70 CHECK 463594 TOTAL: 35.70 463595 08/13/2021 PRTD 143018 ECO WORKS SUPPLY 6214 07/15/2021 20210813 1,904.40 CHECK 463595 TOTAL: 1,904.40 463596 08/13/2021 PRTD 160111 ELSA LITECRY 20210628 06/28/2021 20210813 90.00 CHECK 463596 TOTAL: 90.00 463597 08/13/2021 PRTD 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 42702 07/14/2021 20210813 2,000.00 CHECK 463597 TOTAL: 2,000.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 10 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463598 08/13/2021 PRTD 160062 ELM CREEK BREWING COMPANY E-1227 07/29/2021 20210813 204.00 CHECK 463598 TOTAL: 204.00 463599 08/13/2021 PRTD 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES JOR21041 07/14/2021 20210813 10,231.20 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES JOR21040 07/14/2021 20210813 10,510.94 CHECK 463599 TOTAL: 20,742.14 463600 08/13/2021 PRTD 117483 ENGELE, LEE 21FM0819 07/12/2021 20210813 200.00 CHECK 463600 TOTAL: 200.00 463601 08/13/2021 PRTD 100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC BB5494 07/16/2021 20210813 2,585.00 CHECK 463601 TOTAL: 2,585.00 463602 08/13/2021 PRTD 100146 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-7015850 07/06/2021 20210813 267.76 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-421714 07/08/2021 20210813 34.86 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-421807 07/09/2021 20210813 12.34 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-421878 07/12/2021 20210813 13.10 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-422099 07/13/2021 20210813 70.58 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-422055 07/12/2021 20210813 -177.65 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-422056 07/12/2021 20210813 -14.06 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 450255 07/21/2021 20210813 -336.62 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 450729 07/21/2021 20210813 -181.65 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 456195 07/21/2021 20210813 -61.37 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-422802 07/20/2021 20210813 26.48 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 158-054242 07/20/2021 20210813 5.86 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-z26368 07/20/2021 20210813 128.31 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-7038806 07/19/2021 20210813 34.32 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-423137 07/23/2021 20210813 70.51 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 11 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-7056467 07/29/2021 20210813 62.55 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-423735 07/29/2021 20210813 62.55 CHECK 463602 TOTAL: 17.87 463603 08/13/2021 PRTD 147181 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-4086 07/28/2021 20210813 180.00 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-4087 07/28/2021 20210813 300.00 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-4080 07/28/2021 20210813 330.00 CHECK 463603 TOTAL: 810.00 463604 08/13/2021 PRTD 103600 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0478116 07/14/2021 20210813 1,050.00 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0478107 07/14/2021 20210813 632.03 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0478164 07/15/2021 20210813 2,800.00 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0477292 07/15/2021 20210813 1,665.00 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0478061 07/15/2021 20210813 2,413.84 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0468870 07/16/2021 20210813 446.88 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0475812 07/16/2021 20210813 5,459.91 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0477560 07/19/2021 20210813 1,731.00 CHECK 463604 TOTAL: 16,198.66 463605 08/13/2021 PRTD 138685 FIRE CATT LLC 9299 04/30/2021 20210813 3,273.90 CHECK 463605 TOTAL: 3,273.90 463606 08/13/2021 PRTD 141099 FIRST STUDENT INC 192591 06/25/2021 20210813 196.50 CHECK 463606 TOTAL: 196.50 463607 08/13/2021 PRTD 104716 GALE-TEC ENGINEERING INC 3115 08/03/2021 20210813 1,170.00 CHECK 463607 TOTAL: 1,170.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 12 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463608 08/13/2021 PRTD 102456 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1404106 07/19/2021 20210813 91.00 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1404198 07/19/2021 20210813 21.99 CHECK 463608 TOTAL: 112.99 463609 08/13/2021 PRTD 160159 GARB ALTERNATIVE SPORTSWEAR INC 135525 07/14/2021 20210813 1,071.35 CHECK 463609 TOTAL: 1,071.35 463610 08/13/2021 PRTD 101931 HANESBRANDS INC 41840750 07/15/2021 20210813 1,126.28 HANESBRANDS INC 41840789 07/15/2021 20210813 1,039.71 CHECK 463610 TOTAL: 2,165.99 463611 08/13/2021 PRTD 144982 GERTEN GREENHOUSES & GARDEN CENTE 542977/6 07/13/2021 20210813 4,189.17 GERTEN GREENHOUSES & GARDEN CENTE 94998/12 07/14/2021 20210813 1,721.61 CHECK 463611 TOTAL: 5,910.78 463612 08/13/2021 PRTD 143454 GLEASON ENTERPRISES LLC 85553 05/19/2021 20210813 1,525.57 CHECK 463612 TOTAL: 1,525.57 463613 08/13/2021 PRTD 144412 WINEBOW MN00098147 07/27/2021 20210813 528.00 WINEBOW MN00098182 07/27/2021 20210813 322.50 WINEBOW MN00098183 07/27/2021 20210813 1,864.00 CHECK 463613 TOTAL: 2,714.50 463614 08/13/2021 PRTD 160003 GRAY, GLENN S ECH-0719-21 07/19/2021 20210813 50.00 CHECK 463614 TOTAL: 50.00 463615 08/13/2021 PRTD 160108 GREAT RIVER OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC. C2102656-0 05/28/2021 20210813 -11.40 GREAT RIVER OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC. 2104762-0 08/03/2021 20210813 47.53 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 13 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 463615 TOTAL: 36.13 463616 08/13/2021 PRTD 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC 4-426188 07/19/2021 20210813 75.60 CHECK 463616 TOTAL: 75.60 463617 08/13/2021 PRTD 137677 HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC 219728 07/13/2021 20210813 6,260.10 CHECK 463617 TOTAL: 6,260.10 463618 08/13/2021 PRTD 100797 HAWKINS INC 4983773 07/14/2021 20210813 6,120.15 CHECK 463618 TOTAL: 6,120.15 463619 08/13/2021 PRTD 100798 HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIPMENT COMPANY R0049801 07/16/2021 20210813 7,000.00 HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIPMENT COMPANY R0047401 07/14/2021 20210813 7,900.00 CHECK 463619 TOTAL: 14,900.00 463620 08/13/2021 PRTD 143563 HEADFLYER BREWING E-2985 07/27/2021 20210813 110.00 CHECK 463620 TOTAL: 110.00 463621 08/13/2021 PRTD 101503 HCT 20715 08/04/2021 20210813 6,203.74 CHECK 463621 TOTAL: 6,203.74 463622 08/13/2021 PRTD 103085 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000169040 07/15/2021 20210813 58.00 CHECK 463622 TOTAL: 58.00 463623 08/13/2021 PRTD 146896 HENNEPIN COUNTY ELECTIONS SD273Spec 07/01/2021 20210813 5,579.26 CHECK 463623 TOTAL: 5,579.26 463624 08/13/2021 PRTD 102079 HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC 16235 07/15/2021 20210813 1,162.50 CHECK 463624 TOTAL: 1,162.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 14 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463625 08/13/2021 PRTD 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC 429858 07/27/2021 20210813 1,653.30 HOHENSTEINS INC 429857 07/27/2021 20210813 105.60 HOHENSTEINS INC 429853 07/27/2021 20210813 1,888.50 HOHENSTEINS INC 429855 07/27/2021 20210813 75.60 HOHENSTEINS INC 429847 07/27/2021 20210813 1,462.50 CHECK 463625 TOTAL: 5,185.50 463626 08/13/2021 PRTD 160179 HOLM, CHRISTOPHER 21FM0826 07/12/2021 20210813 200.00 CHECK 463626 TOTAL: 200.00 463627 08/13/2021 PRTD 100417 HORIZON CHEMICAL CO 210702057-JV 07/14/2021 20210813 5,663.85 CHECK 463627 TOTAL: 5,663.85 463628 08/13/2021 PRTD 116680 HP INC 9011903375 07/14/2021 20210813 3,100.00 CHECK 463628 TOTAL: 3,100.00 463629 08/13/2021 PRTD 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 103380 07/27/2021 20210813 770.55 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 103383 07/27/2021 20210813 550.40 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 103397 07/27/2021 20210813 383.40 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC Overpayment-50th 07/12/2021 20210813 -7.92 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC Overpayment-York 08/03/2020 20210813 -17.70 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC Overpayment-Vernon 09/30/2020 20210813 -9.24 CHECK 463629 TOTAL: 1,669.49 463630 08/13/2021 PRTD 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORPORATION INV270538 07/16/2021 20210813 117.05 CHECK 463630 TOTAL: 117.05 463631 08/13/2021 PRTD 146407 INGCO INTERNATIONAL 505-4 07/13/2021 20210813 200.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 15 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 463631 TOTAL: 200.00 463632 08/13/2021 PRTD 141969 ESPRESSO SERVICES, INC MN3102190 07/20/2021 20210813 472.50 CHECK 463632 TOTAL: 472.50 463633 08/13/2021 PRTD 100828 GREAT RIVERS PRINTING 67001 07/13/2021 20210813 305.76 CHECK 463633 TOTAL: 305.76 463634 08/13/2021 PRTD 132592 JF AHERN CO 450307 07/14/2021 20210813 2,427.50 CHECK 463634 TOTAL: 2,427.50 463635 08/13/2021 PRTD 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC 185596 07/06/2021 20210813 245.00 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC 185597 07/06/2021 20210813 180.00 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC 185598 07/06/2021 20210813 185.00 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC 185593 07/06/2021 20210813 185.00 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC 185594 07/06/2021 20210813 125.00 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC 186806 07/19/2021 20210813 73.12 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC 186807 07/19/2021 20210813 73.12 CHECK 463635 TOTAL: 1,066.24 463636 08/13/2021 PRTD 160041 JINX TEA, LLC 1427 07/28/2021 20210813 64.40 CHECK 463636 TOTAL: 64.40 463637 08/13/2021 PRTD 100741 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3201385 07/27/2021 20210813 3,003.90 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3211633 07/28/2021 20210813 64.50 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3211629 07/28/2021 20210813 3,595.80 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3211630 07/28/2021 20210813 3,930.60 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3211632 07/28/2021 20210813 445.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 16 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 463637 TOTAL: 11,039.80 463638 08/13/2021 PRTD 100835 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3487648 07/29/2021 20210813 1,816.60 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3467649 07/29/2021 20210813 160.00 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3487644 07/29/2021 20210813 160.00 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3487645 07/29/2021 20210813 824.50 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3487646 07/29/2021 20210813 2,935.75 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3487647 07/29/2021 20210813 120.00 CHECK 463638 TOTAL: 6,016.85 463639 08/13/2021 PRTD 100835 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6242410 07/22/2021 20210813 297.52 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6246013 07/29/2021 20210813 239.69 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6246020 07/29/2021 20210813 1,266.59 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6246021 07/29/2021 20210813 81.19 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6246022 07/29/2021 20210813 1,014.29 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6246023 07/29/2021 20210813 2,938.93 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6246008 07/29/2021 20210813 788.15 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6246009 07/29/2021 20210813 737.95 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6246010 07/29/2021 20210813 244.02 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6246011 07/29/2021 20210813 1,294.28 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6246016 07/29/2021 20210813 81.19 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6246015 07/29/2021 20210813 2,935.39 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6246014 07/29/2021 20210813 2,229.14 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6246012 07/29/2021 20210813 239.69 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 637986 07/27/2021 20210813 -175.50 CHECK 463639 TOTAL: 14,212.52 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 17 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463640 08/13/2021 PRTD 100835 WINE MERCHANTS 7340195 07/29/2021 20210813 48.38 WINE MERCHANTS 7340196 07/29/2021 20210813 1,647.47 WINE MERCHANTS 7340197 07/29/2021 20210813 1,428.71 WINE MERCHANTS 7340191 07/29/2021 20210813 1,561.09 WINE MERCHANTS 7340194 07/29/2021 20210813 2,073.90 WINE MERCHANTS 7340192 07/29/2021 20210813 145.14 WINE MERCHANTS 7340193 07/29/2021 20210813 2,438.61 CHECK 463640 TOTAL: 9,343.30 463641 08/13/2021 PRTD 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1781617 04/15/2021 20210813 926.45 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1772610-1 04/01/2021 20210813 -180.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1852053 07/23/2021 20210813 3,629.75 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1851786 07/23/2021 20210813 3,620.03 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 154168 07/02/2021 20210813 -47.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 154167 07/02/2021 20210813 -6.66 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1655005-1 10/01/2020 20210813 13.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855588 07/29/2021 20210813 403.04 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855589 07/29/2021 20210813 475.02 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855567 07/29/2021 20210813 878.08 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855590 07/29/2021 20210813 4,011.08 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855558 07/29/2021 20210813 1,349.30 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855570 07/29/2021 20210813 821.07 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855585 07/29/2021 20210813 591.61 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855587 07/29/2021 20210813 50.69 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855586 07/29/2021 20210813 920.84 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855559 07/29/2021 20210813 139.15 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 18 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855560 07/29/2021 20210813 265.26 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855561 07/29/2021 20210813 1,414.74 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855562 07/29/2021 20210813 475.70 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855563 07/29/2021 20210813 1,451.90 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855564 07/29/2021 20210813 203.58 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855566 07/29/2021 20210813 539.04 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855572 07/29/2021 20210813 230.51 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855556 07/29/2021 20210813 674.66 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855569 07/29/2021 20210813 2,483.31 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855568 07/29/2021 20210813 1,801.81 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855571 07/29/2021 20210813 1,201.09 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855578 07/29/2021 20210813 3.57 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855565 07/29/2021 20210813 2.38 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855577 07/29/2021 20210813 621.42 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855575 07/29/2021 20210813 943.42 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855581 07/29/2021 20210813 545.52 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855580 07/29/2021 20210813 1,173.89 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855574 07/29/2021 20210813 2,511.58 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855573 07/29/2021 20210813 859.70 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855576 07/29/2021 20210813 475.02 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1855557 07/29/2021 20210813 1,108.37 CHECK 463641 TOTAL: 36,581.92 463642 08/13/2021 PRTD 102113 AUDRANN INC 1323304 07/19/2021 20210813 74.25 CHECK 463642 TOTAL: 74.25 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 19 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463643 08/13/2021 PRTD 141864 JOSEPH E JOHNSON & SONS CONSTRUCT 1148 07/06/2021 20210813 8,960.00 CHECK 463643 TOTAL: 8,960.00 463644 08/13/2021 PRTD 103409 KELBRO COMPANY 2653912 07/24/2021 20210813 103.33 KELBRO COMPANY 2653909 07/24/2021 20210813 99.79 KELBRO COMPANY 2654847 07/29/2021 20210813 112.38 KELBRO COMPANY 2654848 07/29/2021 20210813 123.70 CHECK 463644 TOTAL: 439.20 463645 08/13/2021 PRTD 100944 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 134679 07/27/2021 20210813 1,605.75 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 134651 07/27/2021 20210813 643.75 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 134672 07/27/2021 20210813 311.50 CHECK 463645 TOTAL: 2,561.00 463646 08/13/2021 PRTD 130042 KULLY SUPPLY INC 547461 05/25/2021 20210813 339.70 CHECK 463646 TOTAL: 339.70 463647 08/13/2021 PRTD 151024 LA DONA SBC 4889 07/28/2021 20210813 72.00 LA DONA SBC 4890 07/28/2021 20210813 108.00 CHECK 463647 TOTAL: 180.00 463648 08/13/2021 PRTD 151166 LAMIS, JAMES 18875 07/17/2021 20210813 3,277.50 CHECK 463648 TOTAL: 3,277.50 463649 08/13/2021 PRTD 100605 LANDS' END INC SIN9349608 07/19/2021 20210813 620.00 CHECK 463649 TOTAL: 620.00 463650 08/13/2021 PRTD 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9308612886 07/13/2021 20210813 34.55 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9308612887 07/13/2021 20210813 34.55 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 20 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9308616549 07/14/2021 20210813 171.11 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9308620625 07/15/2021 20210813 895.85 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9308620626 07/15/2021 20210813 852.28 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 5285 05/11/2016 20210813 -34.24 CHECK 463650 TOTAL: 1,954.10 463651 08/13/2021 PRTD 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURA 19940 07/21/2021 20210813 15,203.58 CHECK 463651 TOTAL: 15,203.58 463652 08/13/2021 PRTD 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURA 19941 07/21/2021 20210813 5,831.30 CHECK 463652 TOTAL: 5,831.30 463653 08/13/2021 PRTD 135867 LIBATION PROJECT 37583 07/27/2021 20210813 372.50 LIBATION PROJECT 37584 07/27/2021 20210813 534.00 LIBATION PROJECT 37585 07/27/2021 20210813 219.00 CHECK 463653 TOTAL: 1,125.50 463654 08/13/2021 PRTD 130046 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH A JULY 2021 07/16/2021 20210813 2,766.14 CHECK 463654 TOTAL: 2,766.14 463655 08/13/2021 PRTD 160043 LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS INC. 87765 07/15/2021 20210813 1,925.00 CHECK 463655 TOTAL: 1,925.00 463656 08/13/2021 PRTD 101146 LINGO - FORMERLY IMPACT 608796420 07/18/2021 20210813 98.43 CHECK 463656 TOTAL: 98.43 463657 08/13/2021 PRTD 100858 LOGIS 50300 05/01/2021 20210813 39,096.50 CHECK 463657 TOTAL: 39,096.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 21 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463658 08/13/2021 PRTD 146427 LUCID BREWING LLC 11368 07/28/2021 20210813 142.00 LUCID BREWING LLC 11367 07/28/2021 20210813 392.00 CHECK 463658 TOTAL: 534.00 463659 08/13/2021 PRTD 160192 LUPO, MICHAEL J 21CLP830 07/26/2021 20210813 150.00 CHECK 463659 TOTAL: 150.00 463660 08/13/2021 PRTD 141916 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 38830 07/27/2021 20210813 195.00 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 38829 07/27/2021 20210813 221.40 CHECK 463660 TOTAL: 416.40 463661 08/13/2021 PRTD 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 22488767 07/19/2021 20210813 12,245.54 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 22488768 07/19/2021 20210813 1,245.71 CHECK 463661 TOTAL: 13,491.25 463662 08/13/2021 PRTD 143357 MARSH & MCLENNAN AGENCY LLC CO - 1558241 07/15/2021 20210813 19,000.00 CHECK 463662 TOTAL: 19,000.00 463663 08/13/2021 PRTD 141215 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV618164 07/27/2021 20210813 133.50 CHECK 463663 TOTAL: 133.50 463664 08/13/2021 PRTD 119992 MCCARTHY WELL COMPANY 29223 07/16/2021 20210813 600.00 CHECK 463664 TOTAL: 600.00 463665 08/13/2021 PRTD 130477 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 591199 07/28/2021 20210813 331.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 591200 07/28/2021 20210813 42.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 591192 07/28/2021 20210813 854.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 591193 07/28/2021 20210813 146.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 591191 07/28/2021 20210813 52.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 22 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 591190 07/28/2021 20210813 582.00 CHECK 463665 TOTAL: 2,007.00 463666 08/13/2021 PRTD 101327 CROSBIE. SCOTT 21CLP815 07/26/2021 20210813 600.00 CHECK 463666 TOTAL: 600.00 463667 08/13/2021 PRTD 101483 MENARDS INC 42899 07/13/2021 20210813 172.01 MENARDS INC 42918 07/13/2021 20210813 11.36 MENARDS INC 42989 07/14/2021 20210813 80.87 MENARDS INC 42969 07/14/2021 20210813 168.93 MENARDS INC 42967 07/14/2021 20210813 23.82 MENARDS INC 43037 07/15/2021 20210813 19.68 MENARDS INC 43023 07/15/2021 20210813 146.79 MENARDS INC 43025 07/15/2021 20210813 40.87 MENARDS INC 43283 07/19/2021 20210813 5.28 CHECK 463667 TOTAL: 669.61 463668 08/13/2021 PRTD 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD LLC 524708 07/13/2021 20210813 18.13 METROPOLITAN FORD LLC 524711 07/13/2021 20210813 25.77 METROPOLITAN FORD LLC CM524834 08/06/2021 20210813 -29.98 CHECK 463668 TOTAL: 13.92 463669 08/13/2021 PRTD 138732 TRADITION WINE & SPIRITS LLC 27385 07/27/2021 20210813 489.00 TRADITION WINE & SPIRITS LLC 27384 07/27/2021 20210813 326.00 TRADITION WINE & SPIRITS LLC 27383 07/27/2021 20210813 165.00 CHECK 463669 TOTAL: 980.00 463670 08/13/2021 PRTD 104650 MICRO CENTER 8789458 07/19/2021 20210813 24.99 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 23 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 463670 TOTAL: 24.99 463671 08/13/2021 PRTD 127639 MIDWAY FORD COMPANY 129873 07/13/2021 22100006 20210813 38,270.92 CHECK 463671 TOTAL: 38,270.92 463672 08/13/2021 PRTD 134387 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC 78899 07/16/2021 20210813 73.40 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC 78953 07/16/2021 20210813 30.36 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC 78995 07/16/2021 20210813 29.36 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC 78991 07/16/2021 20210813 291.59 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC 79063 07/16/2021 20210813 223.75 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC 79080 07/16/2021 20210813 247.90 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC 79083 07/16/2021 20210813 286.06 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC 78974 07/16/2021 20210813 117.92 CHECK 463672 TOTAL: 1,300.34 463673 08/13/2021 PRTD 160177 MIDWEST MECHANICAL SUPPLY INC 09509 07/14/2021 20210813 4,640.52 CHECK 463673 TOTAL: 4,640.52 463674 08/13/2021 PRTD 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 00076126 - SRT PD 04/30/2021 20210813 81.54 CHECK 463674 TOTAL: 81.54 463675 08/13/2021 PRTD 117724 MINNEAPOLIS/ST PAUL BUSINESS JOUR 10850 05/12/2021 20210813 105.00 CHECK 463675 TOTAL: 105.00 463676 08/13/2021 PRTD 145641 MINNESOTA MANDOLIN ORCHESTRA 21CLP82 07/26/2021 20210813 150.00 CHECK 463676 TOTAL: 150.00 463677 08/13/2021 PRTD 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS COMPANY 84988 07/19/2021 20210813 738.15 CHECK 463677 TOTAL: 738.15 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 24 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463678 08/13/2021 PRTD 128914 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 31452 07/16/2021 20210813 361.00 CHECK 463678 TOTAL: 361.00 463679 08/13/2021 PRTD 120550 MOBILE RADIO ENGINEERING INC IN19292 07/14/2021 20210813 274.05 CHECK 463679 TOTAL: 274.05 463680 08/13/2021 PRTD 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC E-23852 07/27/2021 20210813 441.00 MODIST BREWING LLC E-23854 07/27/2021 20210813 648.00 MODIST BREWING LLC E-23853 07/27/2021 20210813 414.00 CHECK 463680 TOTAL: 1,503.00 463681 08/13/2021 PRTD 100912 MOTOROLA INC 8281207507 07/13/2021 20210813 4,579.15 MOTOROLA INC 8281209490 07/15/2021 20210813 9,158.30 CHECK 463681 TOTAL: 13,737.45 463682 08/13/2021 PRTD 129657 MS INDUSTRIES INC 308454 07/16/2021 20210813 865.21 CHECK 463682 TOTAL: 865.21 463683 08/13/2021 PRTD 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1313313-00 07/13/2021 20210813 572.40 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1313817-00 07/15/2021 20210813 141.55 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1313861-00 07/15/2021 20210813 51.63 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1314317-00 07/19/2021 20210813 51.60 CHECK 463683 TOTAL: 817.18 463684 08/13/2021 PRTD 132591 MUSKA ELECTRIC COMPANY 36153 07/14/2021 20210813 9,957.49 MUSKA ELECTRIC COMPANY 36641A 07/14/2021 22100029 20210813 12,970.00 CHECK 463684 TOTAL: 22,927.49 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 25 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463685 08/13/2021 PRTD 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 2122-736243 07/15/2021 20210813 32.98 CHECK 463685 TOTAL: 32.98 463686 08/13/2021 PRTD 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 176469 07/28/2021 20210813 662.00 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 175848 07/28/2021 20210813 148.00 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 176468 07/28/2021 20210813 870.00 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 176474 07/28/2021 20210813 1,318.00 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 176467 07/28/2021 20210813 922.00 CHECK 463686 TOTAL: 3,920.00 463687 08/13/2021 PRTD 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 52603 07/14/2021 20210813 556.25 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 52608 07/15/2021 20210813 230.84 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 52609 07/15/2021 20210813 237.50 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 52618 07/19/2021 20210813 222.50 CHECK 463687 TOTAL: 1,247.09 463688 08/13/2021 PRTD 143137 NORTHERN STAR COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OUTDOOR CLIMBING 7-107/06/2021 20210813 448.50 CHECK 463688 TOTAL: 448.50 463689 08/13/2021 PRTD 136562 NORTHLAND RECREATION LLC 2378 07/14/2021 20210813 2,968.00 CHECK 463689 TOTAL: 2,968.00 463690 08/13/2021 PRTD 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 183455694001 07/16/2021 20210813 59.07 CHECK 463690 TOTAL: 59.07 463691 08/13/2021 PRTD 141965 OMNI BREWING COMPANY LLC E-10333 07/27/2021 20210813 84.00 OMNI BREWING COMPANY LLC E-10335 07/26/2021 20210813 207.00 CHECK 463691 TOTAL: 291.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 26 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463692 08/13/2021 PRTD 999995 C Alan Homes LLC ED176768-REFUND 08/04/2021 20210813 10,000.00 CHECK 463692 TOTAL: 10,000.00 463693 08/13/2021 PRTD 999995 CRAFT HOMES ED190899 & 190897 RE06/22/2021 20210813 220.00 CHECK 463693 TOTAL: 220.00 463694 08/13/2021 PRTD 999995 CRAFT HOMES LLC ED174571-REFUND 08/03/2021 20210813 9,885.00 CHECK 463694 TOTAL: 9,885.00 463695 08/13/2021 PRTD 999995 Craft Homes LLC ED179890-REFUND 08/06/2021 20210813 10,000.00 CHECK 463695 TOTAL: 10,000.00 463696 08/13/2021 PRTD 999995 Craft Homes LLC ED175489-REFUND 08/06/2021 20210813 2,500.00 CHECK 463696 TOTAL: 2,500.00 463697 08/13/2021 PRTD 999995 Craft Homes LLC ED177760-REFUND 08/06/2021 20210813 10,000.00 CHECK 463697 TOTAL: 10,000.00 463698 08/13/2021 PRTD 999995 Craft Homes LLC ED175994-REFUND 08/09/2021 20210813 10,000.00 CHECK 463698 TOTAL: 10,000.00 463699 08/13/2021 PRTD 999995 MIDLAND HVAC 20908 08/05/2021 20210813 73.12 CHECK 463699 TOTAL: 73.12 463700 08/13/2021 PRTD 999995 Minnesota Green Inc ED188088-REFUND 08/04/2021 20210813 2,000.00 CHECK 463700 TOTAL: 2,000.00 463701 08/13/2021 PRTD 999995 Refined LLC ED178174-REFUND 08/06/2021 20210813 9,780.00 CHECK 463701 TOTAL: 9,780.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 27 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463702 08/13/2021 PRTD 999994 CENTRAIRE HEATING & AIR ED190923-REFUND 08/04/2021 20210813 38.60 CHECK 463702 TOTAL: 38.60 463703 08/13/2021 PRTD 999994 S. Robideau Construction ED183432-REFUND 08/04/2021 20210813 230.32 CHECK 463703 TOTAL: 230.32 463704 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Brzezinski, Leah 1371251 07/27/2021 20210813 70.00 CHECK 463704 TOTAL: 70.00 463705 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Brzezinski, Leah 1371250 07/27/2021 20210813 70.00 CHECK 463705 TOTAL: 70.00 463706 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 CONDIT-SHRESTHA, KELLY CONDIT-SH - CLASS RE07/30/2021 20210813 139.00 CHECK 463706 TOTAL: 139.00 463707 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Eastman, Lena REFUNDEastman, Lena 08/03/2021 20210813 228.00 CHECK 463707 TOTAL: 228.00 463708 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Enderlein, Rachel REFUNDEnderlein, Rac08/03/2021 20210813 106.25 CHECK 463708 TOTAL: 106.25 463709 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 EXLEY, JEREMY EXLEY - CLASS REF 07/30/2021 20210813 125.00 CHECK 463709 TOTAL: 125.00 463710 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Frazier, Jacqueline REFUNDFrazier, Jacqu08/03/2021 20210813 100.00 CHECK 463710 TOTAL: 100.00 463711 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Frazier, Jacqueline TAXREFUNDFrazier, Ja08/03/2021 20210813 7.52 CHECK 463711 TOTAL: 7.52 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 28 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463712 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Garrido, Deborah REFUNDGarrido, Debor08/03/2021 20210813 75.00 CHECK 463712 TOTAL: 75.00 463713 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Garrido, Deborah TAXREFUNDGarrido, De08/03/2021 20210813 5.64 CHECK 463713 TOTAL: 5.64 463714 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Gray, Amanda REFUNDGray, Amanda 08/03/2021 20210813 134.00 CHECK 463714 TOTAL: 134.00 463715 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Heacox, Diane 1374413 07/27/2021 20210813 70.00 CHECK 463715 TOTAL: 70.00 463716 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Heacox, Diane 1374414 07/27/2021 20210813 70.00 CHECK 463716 TOTAL: 70.00 463717 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 JENNA TAUSCHECK 20704 08/03/2021 20210813 215.05 CHECK 463717 TOTAL: 215.05 463718 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Knox, Nathan REFUNDKnox, Nathan 08/03/2021 20210813 17.50 CHECK 463718 TOTAL: 17.50 463719 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Kroll, Niki REFUNDKroll, Niki 08/03/2021 20210813 149.00 CHECK 463719 TOTAL: 149.00 463720 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 LALL, CASSANDRA LALL - CLASS REF 07/30/2021 20210813 240.00 CHECK 463720 TOTAL: 240.00 463721 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Lall, Cassandra REFUNDLall, Cassandr08/03/2021 20210813 144.00 CHECK 463721 TOTAL: 144.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 29 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463722 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Lo, Yvonne REFUNDLo, Yvonne 08/03/2021 20210813 105.00 CHECK 463722 TOTAL: 105.00 463723 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Lo, Yvonne TAXREFUNDLo, Yvonne 08/03/2021 20210813 7.90 CHECK 463723 TOTAL: 7.90 463724 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Lundegaard, Ingrid Sundstrom Lundgaard 07/27/2021 20210813 137.40 CHECK 463724 TOTAL: 137.40 463725 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Metzger, Ruthann 1354664 07/27/2021 20210813 70.00 CHECK 463725 TOTAL: 70.00 463726 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Metzger, Ruthann 1354663 07/27/2021 20210813 70.00 CHECK 463726 TOTAL: 70.00 463727 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 O'neill, Annie 1351226 07/27/2021 20210813 155.00 CHECK 463727 TOTAL: 155.00 463728 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Penk-Smith, Emily 1356499 07/27/2021 20210813 240.00 CHECK 463728 TOTAL: 240.00 463729 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Plank, Hillary 1346834 07/27/2021 20210813 235.00 CHECK 463729 TOTAL: 235.00 463730 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Rogers, Kelly REFUNDRogers, Kelly 08/03/2021 20210813 134.00 CHECK 463730 TOTAL: 134.00 463731 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Schleusener, Allen REFUNDSchleusener, A08/03/2021 20210813 52.50 CHECK 463731 TOTAL: 52.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 30 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463732 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Schultz, Erin REFUNDSchultz, Erin 08/03/2021 20210813 846.00 CHECK 463732 TOTAL: 846.00 463733 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Schwarzrock, Ruth 1377043 07/27/2021 20210813 35.00 CHECK 463733 TOTAL: 35.00 463734 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 SEYMOUR, JEFF SEYMOUR - CLASS REF 07/30/2021 20210813 239.00 CHECK 463734 TOTAL: 239.00 463735 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Skanse, Tanya REFUNDSkanse, Tanya 08/03/2021 20210813 5.00 CHECK 463735 TOTAL: 5.00 463736 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Thomas, Alyssa REFUNDThomas, Alyssa08/03/2021 20210813 268.00 CHECK 463736 TOTAL: 268.00 463737 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 TWO TEACHER CONSTRUCTION, INC ED187650-REFUND 08/03/2021 20210813 2,000.00 CHECK 463737 TOTAL: 2,000.00 463738 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Wirth, Megan 1351288 07/27/2021 20210813 430.00 CHECK 463738 TOTAL: 430.00 463739 08/13/2021 PRTD 999996 Wirth, Megan 1351287 07/27/2021 20210813 430.00 CHECK 463739 TOTAL: 430.00 463740 08/13/2021 PRTD 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 51273509 07/27/2021 20210813 494.72 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 49205657 07/27/2021 20210813 640.10 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 50008660 07/23/2021 20210813 585.20 CHECK 463740 TOTAL: 1,720.02 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 31 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463741 08/13/2021 PRTD 149249 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-109741 07/29/2021 20210813 218.00 CHECK 463741 TOTAL: 218.00 463742 08/13/2021 PRTD 140243 PK BLOODY MARY CORP 1695 07/27/2021 20210813 72.00 CHECK 463742 TOTAL: 72.00 463743 08/13/2021 PRTD 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC 365148 07/15/2021 20210813 2,223.86 CHECK 463743 TOTAL: 2,223.86 463744 08/13/2021 PRTD 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 7148610 07/14/2021 20210813 62.40 CHECK 463744 TOTAL: 62.40 463745 08/13/2021 PRTD 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 210539784 07/19/2021 20210813 137.50 CHECK 463745 TOTAL: 137.50 463746 08/13/2021 PRTD 131291 PPG ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES 985102067600 07/14/2021 20210813 16.17 CHECK 463746 TOTAL: 16.17 463747 08/13/2021 PRTD 102728 PRECISION LANDSCAPE AND TREE, INC 83365 07/16/2021 20210813 1,150.00 CHECK 463747 TOTAL: 1,150.00 463748 08/13/2021 PRTD 143618 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-25381 07/27/2021 20210813 292.50 CHECK 463748 TOTAL: 292.50 463749 08/13/2021 PRTD 112097 PUMP & METER SERVICE 33992-1 07/19/2021 20210813 205.25 CHECK 463749 TOTAL: 205.25 463750 08/13/2021 PRTD 132465 RANGE SYSTEMS INC 27642 08/09/2021 22100009 20210813 217,647.00 CHECK 463750 TOTAL: 217,647.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 32 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463751 08/13/2021 PRTD 133627 REPUBLIC SERVICES #894 0894-005464340 07/25/2021 20210813 5,338.18 CHECK 463751 TOTAL: 5,338.18 463752 08/13/2021 PRTD 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 82583 07/15/2021 20210813 1,136.00 CHECK 463752 TOTAL: 1,136.00 463753 08/13/2021 PRTD 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 1928570769 07/13/2021 20210813 189.97 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 1928573480 07/19/2021 20210813 16.47 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 1928573481 07/19/2021 20210813 183.44 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 1928573516 07/19/2021 20210813 30.91 CHECK 463753 TOTAL: 420.79 463754 08/13/2021 PRTD 160176 ROBERTS J. MARABELLA 0113 07/15/2021 20210813 50.00 CHECK 463754 TOTAL: 50.00 463755 08/13/2021 PRTD 101659 ORKIN 213158941 07/13/2021 20210813 63.00 CHECK 463755 TOTAL: 63.00 463756 08/13/2021 PRTD 144279 SAFELITE FULFILLMENT INC 01844-454447 07/15/2021 20210813 290.04 CHECK 463756 TOTAL: 290.04 463757 08/13/2021 PRTD 144553 SALTCO LLC 66658 07/15/2021 20210813 70.00 CHECK 463757 TOTAL: 70.00 463758 08/13/2021 PRTD 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP 8105545301 02/01/2021 20210813 904.86 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP 1610 04/29/2019 20210813 -731.44 CHECK 463758 TOTAL: 173.42 463759 08/13/2021 PRTD 132210 RUSCIANO GROUP 66819 07/13/2021 20210813 755.00 RUSCIANO GROUP 66836 07/16/2021 20210813 755.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 33 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 463759 TOTAL: 1,510.00 463760 08/13/2021 PRTD 103249 SHANNON, JIM 21CLP0810 08/09/2021 20210813 150.00 CHECK 463760 TOTAL: 150.00 463761 08/13/2021 PRTD 100995 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 408166 07/14/2021 20210813 1,006.01 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 408807 07/16/2021 20210813 961.47 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 408808 07/16/2021 20210813 854.25 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 408809 07/16/2021 20210813 1,552.32 CHECK 463761 TOTAL: 4,374.05 463762 08/13/2021 PRTD 120784 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 16333 07/16/2021 20210813 106.94 CHECK 463762 TOTAL: 106.94 463763 08/13/2021 PRTD 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 111082289-001 07/13/2021 20210813 435.61 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 111135473-001 07/14/2021 20210813 116.68 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 109503025-001-1 05/25/2021 20210813 10.00 CHECK 463763 TOTAL: 562.29 463764 08/13/2021 PRTD 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL ARV/48777805 07/02/2021 20210813 69.45 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 43707861 07/07/2021 20210813 -282.53 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL ARV/48868626 07/12/2021 20210813 20.43 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL ARV/48899559 07/14/2021 20210813 164.80 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL ARV/48928481 07/15/2021 20210813 15.53 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL ARV/48992309 07/21/2021 20210813 52.64 CHECK 463764 TOTAL: 40.32 463765 08/13/2021 PRTD 127878 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2107226 07/28/2021 20210813 128.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2107224 07/28/2021 20210813 1,870.10 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 34 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2107225 07/28/2021 20210813 135.81 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2107223 07/28/2021 20210813 427.50 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2107220 07/28/2021 20210813 48.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2107221 07/28/2021 20210813 3,220.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2107222 07/28/2021 20210813 448.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2107217 07/28/2021 20210813 136.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2107212 07/28/2021 20210813 3,219.20 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2107218 07/28/2021 20210813 289.73 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2107216 07/28/2021 20210813 300.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2107215 07/28/2021 20210813 135.81 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2107214 07/28/2021 20210813 1,190.40 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2107211 07/28/2021 20210813 96.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2107213 07/28/2021 20210813 749.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2107206 07/28/2021 20210813 3,220.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2107207 07/28/2021 20210813 300.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2107210 07/28/2021 20210813 135.81 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2107209 07/28/2021 20210813 1,917.10 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2107204 07/28/2021 20210813 96.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2107208 07/28/2021 20210813 159.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2107205 07/28/2021 20210813 486.40 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 5072658 07/29/2021 20210813 1.60 CHECK 463765 TOTAL: 18,718.66 463766 08/13/2021 PRTD 104672 SPRINT SPECTRUM LP 873184124-224 07/18/2021 20210813 135.20 CHECK 463766 TOTAL: 135.20 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 35 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463767 08/13/2021 PRTD 101004 SPS COMPANIES INC S4498008.001 07/16/2021 20210813 163.60 CHECK 463767 TOTAL: 163.60 463768 08/13/2021 PRTD 146960 STACKED DECK BREWING 002934 07/27/2021 20210813 308.00 STACKED DECK BREWING 002940 07/28/2021 20210813 192.00 STACKED DECK BREWING 002939 07/28/2021 20210813 456.00 CHECK 463768 TOTAL: 956.00 463769 08/13/2021 PRTD 145599 SSI MN TRANCHE 1 LLC 17576 07/19/2021 20210813 14,121.67 CHECK 463769 TOTAL: 14,121.67 463770 08/13/2021 PRTD 139006 OFFICE OF MNIT SERVICES W21030564 07/15/2021 20210813 3,986.88 CHECK 463770 TOTAL: 3,986.88 463771 08/13/2021 PRTD 139006 OFFICE OF MNIT SERVICES W21060567 07/15/2021 20210813 299.40 CHECK 463771 TOTAL: 299.40 463772 08/13/2021 PRTD 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 41305 07/28/2021 20210813 390.00 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 41306 07/28/2021 20210813 219.00 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 41275 07/28/2021 20210813 165.00 CHECK 463772 TOTAL: 774.00 463773 08/13/2021 PRTD 101015 STREICHERS INC I1513026 07/13/2021 20210813 183.00 STREICHERS INC I1513002 07/13/2021 20210813 124.99 STREICHERS INC I1513672 07/16/2021 20210813 21.99 CHECK 463773 TOTAL: 329.98 463774 08/13/2021 PRTD 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 163379 07/14/2021 20210813 131.96 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 164336 07/16/2021 20210813 92.78 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 36 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 163727 07/15/2021 20210813 131.71 CHECK 463774 TOTAL: 356.45 463775 08/13/2021 PRTD 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC 10179681 07/14/2021 20210813 60.00 CHECK 463775 TOTAL: 60.00 463776 08/13/2021 PRTD 135803 SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CAN July 2021 07/16/2021 20210813 5,108.71 SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CAN July 2021 #2 07/16/2021 20210813 2,952.51 SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CAN July 2021 #3 07/16/2021 20210813 7,106.80 SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CAN July 2021 #4 07/16/2021 20210813 258.75 CHECK 463776 TOTAL: 15,426.77 463777 08/13/2021 PRTD 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC DB 3044725 07/13/2021 20210813 615.00 CHECK 463777 TOTAL: 615.00 463778 08/13/2021 PRTD 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA INC 347562839 07/14/2021 20210813 1,181.90 SYSCO MINNESOTA INC 347565842 07/16/2021 20210813 409.65 SYSCO MINNESOTA INC 347566438 07/16/2021 20210813 529.70 SYSCO MINNESOTA INC 347570444 07/19/2021 20210813 2,156.38 CHECK 463778 TOTAL: 4,277.63 463779 08/13/2021 PRTD 101038 TOLL COMPANY 40127268-1 08/03/2021 20210813 48.96 CHECK 463779 TOTAL: 48.96 463780 08/13/2021 PRTD 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 5015984676 07/16/2021 20210813 200.27 CHECK 463780 TOTAL: 200.27 463781 08/13/2021 PRTD 136342 TRAVISMATHEW LLC 90307298 07/16/2021 20210813 928.09 CHECK 463781 TOTAL: 928.09 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 37 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 463782 08/13/2021 PRTD 103218 TRI-STATE BOBCAT W93525 07/14/2021 20210813 2,072.56 CHECK 463782 TOTAL: 2,072.56 463783 08/13/2021 PRTD 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO 50082 07/19/2021 20210813 662.50 CHECK 463783 TOTAL: 662.50 463784 08/13/2021 PRTD 100689 ULTIMATE SAFETY CONCEPTS INC 195372 07/16/2021 20210813 4,277.00 CHECK 463784 TOTAL: 4,277.00 463785 08/13/2021 PRTD 131957 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC, LLC 150-0055873-01 07/14/2021 20210813 162.40 CHECK 463785 TOTAL: 162.40 463786 08/13/2021 PRTD 140009 US KIDS GOLF LLC IN2021555 07/14/2021 20210813 157.76 CHECK 463786 TOTAL: 157.76 463787 08/13/2021 PRTD 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 663768 07/15/2021 20210813 38.95 USA BLUE BOOK 666794 07/19/2021 20210813 195.85 CHECK 463787 TOTAL: 234.80 463788 08/13/2021 PRTD 100050 USPS 03620836-8/2021 08/11/2021 20210813 500.00 CHECK 463788 TOTAL: 500.00 463789 08/13/2021 PRTD 100050 USPS 20339 07/30/2021 20210813 5,367.53 CHECK 463789 TOTAL: 5,367.53 463790 08/13/2021 PRTD 144033 USS MINNESOTA ONE MT LLC 18026 07/19/2021 20210813 8,639.48 CHECK 463790 TOTAL: 8,639.48 463791 08/13/2021 PRTD 101058 VAN PAPER COMPANY 580634-00 07/14/2021 20210813 82.35 VAN PAPER COMPANY 581453-00 07/21/2021 20210813 759.20 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 38 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 463791 TOTAL: 841.55 463792 08/13/2021 PRTD 144209 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 2727 07/28/2021 20210813 180.00 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 2729 07/28/2021 20210813 360.00 CHECK 463792 TOTAL: 540.00 463793 08/13/2021 PRTD 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES 63001 07/15/2021 20210813 69.14 CHECK 463793 TOTAL: 69.14 463794 08/13/2021 PRTD 101064 VESSCO INC 83933 07/13/2021 20210813 3,676.28 VESSCO INC 83942 07/14/2021 20210813 715.40 CHECK 463794 TOTAL: 4,391.68 463795 08/13/2021 PRTD 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S004886353.001 07/14/2021 20210813 8.51 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S004851588.002 07/15/2021 20210813 1,482.00 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S004888140.001 07/15/2021 20210813 246.24 CHECK 463795 TOTAL: 1,736.75 463796 08/13/2021 PRTD 119454 VINOCOPIA INC 0283840-IN 07/29/2021 20210813 28.00 VINOCOPIA INC 0283839-IN 07/29/2021 20210813 1,306.25 CHECK 463796 TOTAL: 1,334.25 463797 08/13/2021 PRTD 120627 PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP INC 61290361 07/16/2021 20210813 530.53 CHECK 463797 TOTAL: 530.53 463798 08/13/2021 PRTD 101033 WINE COMPANY 179037 07/28/2021 20210813 3,242.75 WINE COMPANY 179036 07/28/2021 20210813 1,061.20 WINE COMPANY 178945 07/27/2021 20210813 -9.33 WINE COMPANY 179035 07/28/2021 20210813 1,894.70 WINE COMPANY 178946 07/27/2021 20210813 -9.33 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 08/12/2021 13:11User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 39 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET WINE COMPANY 179674 08/04/2021 20210813 3,019.80 CHECK 463798 TOTAL: 9,199.79 463799 08/13/2021 PRTD 130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 64580680 07/14/2021 20210813 332.70 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 64580681 07/14/2021 20210813 902.56 CHECK 463799 TOTAL: 1,235.26 463800 08/13/2021 PRTD 101103 WW GRAINGER 9963030342 07/14/2021 20210813 97.56 CHECK 463800 TOTAL: 97.56 463801 08/13/2021 PRTD 160077 YETI HOLDINGS, INC 990832429 07/14/2021 20210813 1,124.25 CHECK 463801 TOTAL: 1,124.25 463802 08/13/2021 PRTD 130618 CHANHASSEN AUTO CENTERS LLC 21960 07/16/2021 20210813 11,603.35 CHECK 463802 TOTAL: 11,603.35 463803 08/13/2021 PRTD 129312 YOUTH TECH INC 7177 07/14/2021 20210813 1,327.50 CHECK 463803 TOTAL: 1,327.50 NUMBER OF CHECKS 256 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** 1,099,700.12 COUNT AMOUNT TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS 256 1,099,700.12 *** GRAND TOTAL *** 1,099,700.12 Date: August 17, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Risi Karim, City Management Fellow Item Activity: Subject:Ordinance No. 2021-08: Amending Chapter 10 Relating to Rental Licensing Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Ordinance 2021-08, amending Chapter 10 of the Edina City Code regarding Rental Licensing and grant second reading. INTRODUCTION: Council granted first reading of this ordinance at their August 4 regular meeting. See attached report and supporting documents. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Amending Chapter 10 Related to Rental Licensing, Aug. 4 Ordinance No. 2021-08: Amending Chapter 10 Relating to Rental Public Engagement Letters of Support Staff Presentation, Aug. 4 August 4, 2021 Mayor and City Council Risi Karim, City Management Fellow Ordinance No. 2021-08: Amending Chapter 10 Relating to Rental Licensing Information / Background: On April 8, 2021, members of the Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority (HRA) authorized staff to engage the City Attorney to draft a proposed Tenant Protection Ordinance to bring forward to the City Council for adoption. The city has set a goal to both promote and commit to preserving natural occurring affordable housing (NOAH). Protecting tenants who reside in NOAH properties should always be a priority for the city. NOAH properties are defined as buildings where some of the units have rents affordable to households with incomes at or below 60% Area Medium Income (AMI). A Tenant Protection Ordinance would reflect the city’s priorities and goals to provide a full range of housing choices, particularly for low-income residents. Residents along with various community partners have expressed concerns about the displacement of low-income tenants residing in NOAH properties that have been sold to new owners. Staff is requesting the City Council amend Chapter10 of the Edina City Code related to rental licensing to include Section 10-733. Sale of Affordable Housing in order to create a Tenant Protection Ordinance that 1) preserves existing NOAH properties; 2) protect tenants’ rights; and 3) provides added security and housing stability for tenants who depend on residing in units with affordable rents. Tenant Protection Ordinance A Tenant Protection Ordinance typically requires property owners to give a three month protection period to current tenants following the ownership transfer of a NOAH property. During that three month period limits are placed on rent increases, preventing non-renewal of leases without cause, and a requirement to provide relocation assistance upon failure to comply with the ordinance. Neighboring cities St. Louis Park, Bloomington, Richfield, and Hopkins have all passed Tenant Protection Ordinances like this. The April 2020 Maxfield research study reported that Edina has nearly 700 affordable units that are at or above 60% AMI in NOAH rental properties that were built before 1970. This indicates that it is not STAFF REPORT Page 2 unreasonable to assume that there will be an increase in rents charged, especially with a change of ownership. Having a Tenant Protection Ordinance in place prior to the sale of NOAH properties will assist in decreasing the number of tenants that will either become increasingly rent burdened or be forced to move with little to no assistance. Sustainable Housing The Federal standard for affordability is 30% of income for housing costs. Without a separate break-out for households that pay 35% or more, a number of households may be choosing to pay slightly more than 30% of their gross income to obtain their desired housing. Moderately cost-burdened is defined as households paying between 35% and 49.9% of their income for housing. Higher-income households that are cost- burdened may have the option of moving to lower priced housing, but lower-income households often do not. In Edina, 42.3% of renter households are considered cost burdened. Edina has a higher proportion of cost burdened owner households than the Primary Market Area Remainder (17.4%) and the Twin Cities Metro Area (19.8%). Edina has a higher proportion of cost burdened renter households (42.3%) than the PMA (36.7%) but a lower proportion than the Twin Cities Metro Area (43.2%). In the City’s latest approved Comprehensive Plan, the city made a commitment to “to aid and secure affordable lifecycle housing for a diverse community”. A part of securing some of the city’s most vulnerable housing communities is to support tenant rights to ensure that renters are treated fairly and equitably by landlords. Community Engagement At the beginning of the year members of the Edina Neighbors for Affordable Housing (ENAH) convened a roundtable with the following community partners: Anne Mavity Executive Director - Minnesota Housing Partnership (moderator) Bernadette Hornig Portfolio Manager/Partner - Hornig Companies, Inc. Marty McDonough Director of Gov. Affairs - Minnesota Housing Association Andrew (Andy) Akins Partner - Premier Properties LLC Joshua (Josh) Clarke Tenant - Yorkdale Townhomes Jessica Hering Director of Social Services - VEAP Eric Hauge Executive Director - HOME Line Santiago De Angulo Executive VP of Operations - Aeon Cecile Bedor Executive VP of Real Estate - CommonBond Communities Hannah Houts Public Policy Intern - CommonBond Communities The purpose of the roundtable was for the group to discuss recommendations for the City to take under consideration should the city decide to take up the creation of a Tenant Protection Ordinance. In early July staff began solicitation for feedback of the proposed ordinance. In addition to posting on BetterTogetherEdina and announcing through social media, staff mailed out over 4000 postcards targeted towards both renters and landlords of NOAH properties. Community members were asked to provide that feedback through the city’s BetterTogtherEdina platform. Staff received over 20 responses to our request, majority of which were in favor of the ordinance. The feedback that were received are attached to this report. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council adopt a Tenant Protection Ordinance by amending chapter 10 of the Edina City Code relating to rental licensing. ORDINANCE NO. 2021-08 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE RELATING TO RENTAL LICENSING THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. The Edina City Code is amended by adding a new Section 10-733 to read as follows: (a) Definitions. The following definitions apply in this Section of this Code. References to “Section” are unless otherwise specified, references to this Section of this Code. Defined terms remain defined terms, whether or not capitalized. (1) Affordable housing building means a multifamily rental housing building having three or more housing units, where at least 18% of the units rent for an amount that is affordable to households at or below 60 percent of area median income, as median income was most recently determined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, Minnesota- Wisconsin Metropolitan Statistical Area, as adjusted for household size and number of bedrooms. Housing need not be subsidized by federal, state, or local government in order to be considered affordable. (2) Affordable housing unit means a rental unit in an affordable housing building that rents for an amount that is affordable to households at or below 60 percent of area median income, as median income was most recently determined by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development for the Minneapolis-St. Paul- Bloomington, Minnesota-Wisconsin Metropolitan Statistical Area, as adjusted for household size and number of bedrooms. (3) Cause means the tenant or a member of the tenant’s household materially violated a term of the lease or violated a provision of the City’s Rental Housing Ordinance, City Code Section 10-731 Conduct on rental property Rental Licensing Requirements. (4) Tenant protection period means the period that commences on the date when a real estate closing transfers ownership of an affordable housing building and runs for 90 days. (b) Relocation Assistance. (1) If during the tenant protection period the new owner of an affordable housing building terminates or refuses to renew any affordable housing unit tenant’s rental agreement without cause, then upon terminating or refusing to renew the tenant’s lease, the new owner shall pay to the tenant, as relocation assistance, no later than the day upon which the tenant vacates the unit, a payment in the amount as follows: $2,600 for a studio or single room occupancy dwelling unit, $3,000 for a one- bedroom dwelling unit, $3,600 for a two-bedroom dwelling unit, and $4,100 for a three-bedroom or larger dwelling unit. Sec. 10-733. Sale of Affordable Housing (2) During the tenant protection period if a rent increase goes into effect on any affordable housing unit, or the new owner of an affordable housing building raises any affordable housing unit tenant’s rent, or rescreens an existing affordable housing unit tenant, and the tenant gives written notice to the new owner to terminate the rental agreement, the new owner, shall within 30 days of receiving tenant’s written notice of termination of the rental agreement, pay to the tenant as relocation assistance, a payment in the amount as follows: $2,600 for a studio or single room occupancy dwelling unit, $3,000 for a one-bedroom dwelling unit, $3,600 for a two- bedroom dwelling unit, and $4,100 for a three-bedroom or larger dwelling unit. (c) Notice. Whenever ownership of an affordable housing building shall transfer, the new owner shall, within thirty (30) days of the date on which a real estate closing transfers ownership of the affordable housing building, give written notice to each affordable housing unit tenant of the building that the property is under new ownership stating: (1) The name, mailing address, and telephone number of the new owner. (2) Edina City Code 10-733 provides for a tenant protection period for affordable housing unit tenants. Under Section 10-733, affordable housing unit tenants may be entitled to relocation assistance from the new owner if the new owner terminates or does not renew the tenant’s rental agreement without cause within the tenant protection period. Affordable housing unit tenants may also be entitled to relocation assistance from the new owner if the owner raises the rent or initiates a tenant rescreening process within the tenant protection period and the tenant terminates their rental agreement. (3) Whether there will be any rent increase within the tenant protection period with the amount of the rent increase and the date the rent increase will take effect. (4) Whether the new owner will require existing affordable housing unit tenants to be re- screened to determine compliance with existing or modified residency screening criteria during the tenant protection period and if so, a copy of the screening criteria. (5) Whether the new owner will terminate or not renew rental agreements without cause during the tenant protection period and if so, notice to the affected affordable housing unit tenants whose rental agreements will terminate and the date the rental agreements will terminate. (6) Whether the new owner intends to increase rent, require existing affordable housing unit tenants to be rescreened to determine compliance with existing or modified residency screening criteria, or terminate or not renew affordable housing unit rental agreements without cause on the day immediately following the tenant protection period. The new owner shall provide a copy of the notice required by this part to the city’s Community Development Department at the same time notice is provided to the tenants. During the tenant protection period the new owner shall not do the following unless the required notice has been given: terminate a tenant’s lease without cause; refuse to renew a tenant’s lease without cause; raise rent; or rescreen existing tenants. (d) Penalty. In accordance with Sec. 10-726 and Sec. 10-732(d), a violation of this Section may result in a revocation of the rental license. Further, a violation of this Section may result in a rental license renewal denial. (e) Purpose. The City of Edina is committed to the preservation of affordable housing for people who work in Edina, who want to stay in Edina, and who want to move to Edina. Affordable housing includes houses and multifamily options that are affordable to households with low and moderate incomes. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall take effect September 1, 2021. First reading: August 4, 2021 Second reading: Published: ATTEST: ______________________________ _____________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE EDINA SUN CURRENT SEND ONE AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION BILL TO EDINA CITY CLERK Survey Responses 27 June 2021 - 26 July 2021 Ordinance Feedback Form Better Together Edina Project: Tenant Protection Ordinance VISITORS 63 CONTRIBUTORS 23 RESPONSES 23 23 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous 23 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 06, 2021 18:09:36 pm Last Seen:Jul 07, 2021 01:00:48 am Q1.What is your relationship to the ordinance?I am a tenant / renter. Q2.Renters: Do you have concerns if an owner sells the property you are occupying? Q3.Owners: Will the Tenant Protection Plan affect the way you do business? Q4.Do you feel like 90 days is enough time to give or receive notices? Q5.What ways will this ordinance impact you? Provide positive impacts or potential challenges. Yes, because then management changes which brings on a new set of expectations and uncertainty of proper communication. Sometimes for the worse, sometimes for the better. But, I would hate to deter anyone selling or buying property... I'm in the commercial real estate industry and this is free enterprise. not answered Yes. But simply announcing new ownership isn't transparent to the way in which they'll handle business or property management. It's a reasonable amount of notice for increase in rent or lease terms changing. Is there a cap or max to rent increases? If new ownership takes over a property, can they exceed greater than... xyz percent? This ordinance will give me time to decide if I continue to rent or leave IF it's not breaking a current lease term, of course. So, let's say I have a 12-month lease. And new property owner takes over at six months into the lease. My terms and rent stay the same but I'm given notice 90 days prior to my 12-month lease term of any potential changes to a renewed lease? Respondent No:2 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 09, 2021 09:23:44 am Last Seen:Jul 09, 2021 16:16:01 pm Q1.What is your relationship to the ordinance?I am a property owner. Q2.Renters: Do you have concerns if an owner sells the property you are occupying? Q3.Owners: Will the Tenant Protection Plan affect the way you do business? Q4.Do you feel like 90 days is enough time to give or receive notices? Q5.What ways will this ordinance impact you? Provide positive impacts or potential challenges. not answered It will affect my property values in the long run by encouraging renters who are unprepared to manage their own finances property. Too much time. One month should be sufficient. Potential challenges include more deadbeat renters and an increase in legal exposure for all concerned. Edina should be working on attracting employed, solvent residents, not more low-income individuals who are not prepared to be good tenants, and who will stretch limited social services. Respondent No:3 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 13, 2021 10:52:10 am Last Seen:Jul 13, 2021 17:42:33 pm Q1.What is your relationship to the ordinance?I am a property owner. Q2.Renters: Do you have concerns if an owner sells the property you are occupying? Q3.Owners: Will the Tenant Protection Plan affect the way you do business? Q4.Do you feel like 90 days is enough time to give or receive notices? Q5.What ways will this ordinance impact you? Provide positive impacts or potential challenges. not answered It will not change the way we currently do business. 90 days notice is not unreasonable but anything more than that would be. I also think that you should specify that only rent increases of 5% or more require this 90 days notice where increases below that 5% threshold would not require more than usual notice at time of lease renewal (which is 45 to 60 days currently for most multi housing owners). It is another step that Edina is taking to bring equality which is something many citizens applaud. I only hope that we don't dilute the qualities that made Edina great by making too many changes and ending up with problems that cities like Minneapolis have where this is no parking, crime is through the roof, and the overbuilding and re-zoning leads to additional traffic problems and the quality of life greatly deteriorates. This leads to businesses leaving the city which causes more problems. Edina is already seeing a decline in our school rankings, increases in traffic, and increases in crime so try not to make too many changes too fast is my only closing thought. Respondent No:4 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 14, 2021 12:47:00 pm Last Seen:Jul 14, 2021 19:11:17 pm Q1.What is your relationship to the ordinance?I am a property owner. Q2.Renters: Do you have concerns if an owner sells the property you are occupying? Q3.Owners: Will the Tenant Protection Plan affect the way you do business? Q4.Do you feel like 90 days is enough time to give or receive notices? Q5.What ways will this ordinance impact you? Provide positive impacts or potential challenges. not answered Probably. I believe 90 days is too long. Are tenants required to provide a 90 day notice to vacate or only the landlord? I offer and require a 60 day notice of rent increases or tenant vacating the premises. I do not think it is fair to require tenants to provide a 90 day notice of their plans to move. I tend to try and accommodate folks who wish to move and must break a lease by saying I will try and rent their apartment ASAP so they won't be responsible for the remainder of their lease and I do it as a courtesy. I think the city should not intervene as 3rd party to agreements that are between landlords and renters. I do not believe one party should be required to provide a 90 day notice and the other only 30 or 60 days. This should be equal and tenants often need to move in less time. For example I have had several tenants have the opportunity to purchase a house. A 90 day notice would have likely been a burden for them. I do not think an owner of a property should be required to tell the tenant the property is selling to another landlord. If this is something important to a tenant they can easily request it be added to their lease agreement. I've never had a tenant inquire if I planned to continue owning a property for any specific length of time. I believe there is no need for additional protections for good tenants. Landlords do not as a normal rule take advantage or kick out good renters who pay their rent and who are good neighbors. This movement should accurately be called the good tenant inconvenience initiative or the Bad Tenant Protection Plan because if I am stuck with a tenant who is disruptive or who doesn't pay I wish to remove them from my property ASAP in order to return the peace to my other tenants and I can't pay my bills with unpaid rent. The majority of renters and landlords coexist quite happily in their arrangements. Why on earth would a government official feel they have the knowledge and experience to impose a top down solution to a problem that I'm not sure exists. I think this idea is detrimental to tenants and landlords. I run background checks on prospective tenants in order to protect my current tenants. If you were renting, would you prefer your landlord to not be able to screen who might be your neighbor? If a landlord cannot effectively screen tenants by checking for criminal or payment history and once rented that landlord cannot quickly remedy a mistake yes, the landlord is hurt but the neighbors of the bad tenant are much more impacted. What is the goal of this Ordinance? If it is the protection of good tenants by not subjecting them to the dangers and inconveniences brought about by bad tenants then anything that reduces the speed with which that can be corrected is not a good idea. Is it the assumption of whomever is championing this ordinance that all tenants are great and all landlords are bad? If so, then this is an incorrect starting point. In reality, most tenants are awesome and most landlords are decent. The fact that most rental dwellings are occupied is evidence that there probably isn't anything here to be fixed. If anything needs to be fixed it is allowing the process of evictions to take place more quickly and less expensively. For the vast majority, the only people who will get evicted are those who don't pay rent and those who cause problems. I do not think we need laws restricting landlords from doing what they are required to do, provide safe and affordable space for their tenants. Respondent No:5 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 15, 2021 14:37:21 pm Last Seen:Jul 15, 2021 21:35:14 pm Q1.What is your relationship to the ordinance?I am a tenant / renter. Q2.Renters: Do you have concerns if an owner sells the property you are occupying? Q3.Owners: Will the Tenant Protection Plan affect the way you do business? Q4.Do you feel like 90 days is enough time to give or receive notices? Q5.What ways will this ordinance impact you? Provide positive impacts or potential challenges. If the owner sells the property I am going to be displaced. not answered This should be 180 days. if I have to move finding a new place is going to be difficult with the high rents and screening process. It will give me ample time to search and find a new home. Respondent No:6 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 18, 2021 19:10:12 pm Last Seen:Jul 19, 2021 01:47:49 am Q1.What is your relationship to the ordinance?I am a property owner. Q2.Renters: Do you have concerns if an owner sells the property you are occupying? Q3.Owners: Will the Tenant Protection Plan affect the way you do business? Q4.Do you feel like 90 days is enough time to give or receive notices? Q5.What ways will this ordinance impact you? Provide positive impacts or potential challenges. not answered Yes. We have a few rental properties in condo buildings. The relocation assistance is a killer for small players like us that have modest goals. 60 days is plenty - 90 creates stress for occupants but it's doable. I think the program is going to limit further what little affordable housing there is. I really don't think this is the best way to maintain affordable housing in Edina - effectively you are disincentivizing it. I suggest that the city offer tax rebates on property taxes if the landlord agrees to follow rents in the desired price bracket. Respondent No:7 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 19, 2021 17:04:35 pm Last Seen:Jul 20, 2021 00:02:39 am Q1.What is your relationship to the ordinance?I am a tenant / renter. Q2.Renters: Do you have concerns if an owner sells the property you are occupying? Q3.Owners: Will the Tenant Protection Plan affect the way you do business? Q4.Do you feel like 90 days is enough time to give or receive notices? Q5.What ways will this ordinance impact you? Provide positive impacts or potential challenges. Yes not answered yes have enough time to relocate if need be Respondent No:8 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 19, 2021 18:11:10 pm Last Seen:Jul 20, 2021 01:03:03 am Q1.What is your relationship to the ordinance?I am a tenant / renter. Q2.Renters: Do you have concerns if an owner sells the property you are occupying? Q3.Owners: Will the Tenant Protection Plan affect the way you do business? Q4.Do you feel like 90 days is enough time to give or receive notices? Q5.What ways will this ordinance impact you? Provide positive impacts or potential challenges. Yes, that they will sell it to a company that will force residents out by charging way too much for rent. not answered I believe it should be more, given the rental market. I'd say 120 days. I'm concerned I wouldn't find another place if I was priced out. This ordinance would help a bit, to give one time to prepare. Respondent No:9 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 19, 2021 18:23:37 pm Last Seen:Jul 20, 2021 01:18:40 am Q1.What is your relationship to the ordinance?I am a tenant / renter. Q2.Renters: Do you have concerns if an owner sells the property you are occupying? Q3.Owners: Will the Tenant Protection Plan affect the way you do business? Q4.Do you feel like 90 days is enough time to give or receive notices? Q5.What ways will this ordinance impact you? Provide positive impacts or potential challenges. I will have concerns. I don't know if the next owner will be more greedy and charge even way more rent a month. I've come to the point that I can't trust apartment ownerships anymore. not answered No. 180 days is better. It doesn't always take three or four weeks to find a new place and then move in. It could take longer to find a new place in less time, if there is even higher demand for renting property, with fewer apartments available. It would give me more time to relocate to another property in town, or another town within the metro area. Respondent No:10 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 20, 2021 10:03:04 am Last Seen:Jul 20, 2021 16:58:23 pm Q1.What is your relationship to the ordinance?I am a tenant / renter. Q2.Renters: Do you have concerns if an owner sells the property you are occupying? Q3.Owners: Will the Tenant Protection Plan affect the way you do business? Q4.Do you feel like 90 days is enough time to give or receive notices? Q5.What ways will this ordinance impact you? Provide positive impacts or potential challenges. No - none at all. not answered ninety days is too long 30 days is sufficient Edina is a community that should remain upscale and NOAH properties will not foster that aspect. The City Council has invited developers to over build multi-unit buildings at a rapid rate and now wants to cap it? Respondent No:11 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 20, 2021 17:07:45 pm Last Seen:Jul 20, 2021 23:18:04 pm Q1.What is your relationship to the ordinance?I am a tenant / renter. Q2.Renters: Do you have concerns if an owner sells the property you are occupying? Q3.Owners: Will the Tenant Protection Plan affect the way you do business? Q4.Do you feel like 90 days is enough time to give or receive notices? Q5.What ways will this ordinance impact you? Provide positive impacts or potential challenges. Absoluty concerned. Buisness owners are known to not be transparent and not really care about their renters. Lets face it, they really only want to make a buck. Everyone has the right to make money but when it affects those that are in affordable housing that is not something that should be tollerated. Honestly, Edina rental housing is so expensive that I am suprised that there is any afordable housing. Not letting a person know that their rent will increase or the poperty will be turned into more profitable housing can create much anxiety for those affected. The unknown is a very scary thing for most people and when it comes to housing it is even more anxiety provoking. This goes for those in affordable housing or not. I think that this ordance should be for any building that is sold not just affordable housing. not answered Those that sell and puchase properties will know well before 90 days if there will be a change in ownership. It would be reasonable to give 4 months notice. Affordable housing is in very very short supply at all times so those that live in that housing will need at much time as possible to find a new place to live. My guess is that they would need to move out of Edina to find a new abode. Edina rents are extrodinarily high and the likley hood that a new owner would continue offering affordable housing is amost non-exisitent. Edina is allowing property owners to price people out of the area and make it ony high end "luxury" apartments. If all you want is rich white residnets then you are well on your way to that goal. Regardless if you are living in affordable housing or not the rents are pushing modist income and diverse residents to move to other cities. I think that giving rental residents at least 4 months notice would allow them to find other living options. positive impact: giving renters the opportunity to find new housing in a semi-reasonable amount of time. Holding buyers and sellers accountable for notifying renters of changes. Challenges if this not implimentedor challenges of implemeing (it is not clear what you are asking)? If not implimented then it will be evidient that those that are making decisions for the city of Edina are really not vested in keeping the city diverse and a welcoming place to live. It will show that only those that are rich can afford to live here (as it is evident now with how high the rents are going). Suggestion: if you want to make Edina a good place to live that is welcoming to all income levels it might be worth looking at how to cap rents and/or rent increases in the city - perhaps only 1%? I make a modest income but will likley need to move out of the area as rent is getting too high. Again, if you want Edina to go back to the old ways of only the rich and white can live here then you are on the right road. Protecting those in affordable housing is incredibly imortant and shows that you care about all residents. Respondent No:12 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 20, 2021 18:36:16 pm Last Seen:Jul 21, 2021 01:34:35 am Q1.What is your relationship to the ordinance?I am a tenant / renter. Q2.Renters: Do you have concerns if an owner sells the property you are occupying? Q3.Owners: Will the Tenant Protection Plan affect the way you do business? Q4.Do you feel like 90 days is enough time to give or receive notices? Q5.What ways will this ordinance impact you? Provide positive impacts or potential challenges. I have significant concerns if the property at which I live is sold without notifying me and other residents not answered Yes, 90 days seems sufficient It would offer me notification if the property at which I live is sold Respondent No:13 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 20, 2021 18:47:34 pm Last Seen:Jul 21, 2021 01:46:12 am Q1.What is your relationship to the ordinance?I am a tenant / renter. Q2.Renters: Do you have concerns if an owner sells the property you are occupying? Q3.Owners: Will the Tenant Protection Plan affect the way you do business? Q4.Do you feel like 90 days is enough time to give or receive notices? Q5.What ways will this ordinance impact you? Provide positive impacts or potential challenges. Yes not answered Yes Helps find new place to move early since most apartments have 2 month notice Respondent No:14 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 20, 2021 19:16:18 pm Last Seen:Jul 21, 2021 02:12:14 am Q1.What is your relationship to the ordinance?I am a tenant / renter. Q2.Renters: Do you have concerns if an owner sells the property you are occupying? Q3.Owners: Will the Tenant Protection Plan affect the way you do business? Q4.Do you feel like 90 days is enough time to give or receive notices? Q5.What ways will this ordinance impact you? Provide positive impacts or potential challenges. Yes not answered Yes I am on a fixed income and would need at least a 90-day notice if my rent is raised or the property is sold Respondent No:15 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 21, 2021 15:16:47 pm Last Seen:Jul 21, 2021 22:09:57 pm Q1.What is your relationship to the ordinance?I am a tenant / renter. Q2.Renters: Do you have concerns if an owner sells the property you are occupying? Q3.Owners: Will the Tenant Protection Plan affect the way you do business? Q4.Do you feel like 90 days is enough time to give or receive notices? Q5.What ways will this ordinance impact you? Provide positive impacts or potential challenges. Yes, I'd like to know at least 90 days ahead if an owner sells the property that I am occupying. Or some compensation for less than 90 days. Since I need time to find a new place. not answered if an owner sells the property, 90 days or compensation would be fine. If rent increased, I'd like to know 120 days ahead. Plus, I also like to know what's the reason for the rent increase. Since the renter doesn't have an opportunity to participate in management in their rent communites. Positive: Property Owners will have to disclose information ahead to the renter. Renter's may plan ahead for their uncertainty. Negative: Property owners always have ways to get around. Need to have a penalty plan set up prior to this regulation being placed. Respondent No:16 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 21, 2021 17:38:47 pm Last Seen:Jul 22, 2021 00:34:16 am Q1.What is your relationship to the ordinance?I am a property owner. Q2.Renters: Do you have concerns if an owner sells the property you are occupying? Q3.Owners: Will the Tenant Protection Plan affect the way you do business? Q4.Do you feel like 90 days is enough time to give or receive notices? Q5.What ways will this ordinance impact you? Provide positive impacts or potential challenges. not answered I am the owner of a single family home and NOT the owner of a rental property Yes. I think this ordinance will give tenants a reasonable period of time in which to look for new housing if the property where they currently live is being sold. Given the limited supply of affordable housing. Families need lead time in order to secure a new place to live. Respondent No:17 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 22, 2021 08:15:50 am Last Seen:Jul 22, 2021 14:58:48 pm Q1.What is your relationship to the ordinance?I am a tenant / renter. Q2.Renters: Do you have concerns if an owner sells the property you are occupying? Q3.Owners: Will the Tenant Protection Plan affect the way you do business? Q4.Do you feel like 90 days is enough time to give or receive notices? Q5.What ways will this ordinance impact you? Provide positive impacts or potential challenges. I am greatly concerned that I will no longer be able to afford my apartment should the building be sold. I graduated from Edina High School and have lived here off and on ever since. I have lived at my current address in White Oaks for 17 years. Being retired, I would not be able to afford a large rent increase. Unfortunately, Edina’s housing is slowly pushing older residents out. not answered Yes I feel this ordinance would provide more time for renters to make decisions regarding choice/change of residence. Respondent No:18 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 22, 2021 10:03:12 am Last Seen:Jul 22, 2021 16:57:47 pm Q1.What is your relationship to the ordinance?I am a tenant / renter. Q2.Renters: Do you have concerns if an owner sells the property you are occupying? Q3.Owners: Will the Tenant Protection Plan affect the way you do business? Q4.Do you feel like 90 days is enough time to give or receive notices? Q5.What ways will this ordinance impact you? Provide positive impacts or potential challenges. Yes. I'm afraid the rent will skyrocket and I'll have to move, or the new owner will not address maintenance and other concerns as well as the current owner. Afraid property could fall into disrepair. not answered Probably not. When I moved to where I live currently, it took at least 1-2 months to find a suitable and affordable place, then the application process, and availability of new apartment took another 2 months. It will be nice to have at least 90 days notice. Better than 30 days. Respondent No:19 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 22, 2021 14:17:28 pm Last Seen:Jul 22, 2021 21:13:35 pm Q1.What is your relationship to the ordinance?I am a tenant / renter. Q2.Renters: Do you have concerns if an owner sells the property you are occupying? Q3.Owners: Will the Tenant Protection Plan affect the way you do business? Q4.Do you feel like 90 days is enough time to give or receive notices? Q5.What ways will this ordinance impact you? Provide positive impacts or potential challenges. finding Rent that I can afford for another apartment not answered Yes If they give that on time Would like Rent control or places that are affordable! cannot pay high rents Respondent No:20 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 23, 2021 10:15:37 am Last Seen:Jul 23, 2021 17:02:02 pm Q1.What is your relationship to the ordinance?I am a tenant / renter. Q2.Renters: Do you have concerns if an owner sells the property you are occupying? Q3.Owners: Will the Tenant Protection Plan affect the way you do business? Q4.Do you feel like 90 days is enough time to give or receive notices? Q5.What ways will this ordinance impact you? Provide positive impacts or potential challenges. Yes. I have a concern that if the property is sold it will given unnecessary upgrades and the rent will go up — similar to what happened to the large complex in Richfield. not answered 90 days is good if the property is sold. I don’t want to have to give a 90 day notice if I move. I prefer the current 60 day notice. The rent increase notices given are fine the way they are for the building I live in. I don’t agree with the passage of this ordinance because I received a postcard notice about it on July 21 and the feedback ends on July 23. This is not enough time. I called the rental office for my building today and the person I talked to had not heard about this proposed ordinance. Allow more time for those impacted to read the full text of the ordinance. It “sounds” good but the devil is sometimes in the details. Respondent No:21 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 23, 2021 18:22:40 pm Last Seen:Jul 24, 2021 01:12:06 am Q1.What is your relationship to the ordinance?I am a tenant / renter. Q2.Renters: Do you have concerns if an owner sells the property you are occupying? Q3.Owners: Will the Tenant Protection Plan affect the way you do business? Q4.Do you feel like 90 days is enough time to give or receive notices? Q5.What ways will this ordinance impact you? Provide positive impacts or potential challenges. Yes, the building I am in is a prime target for a sale, conversion to condos or scrape and rebuild. not answered Yes. I want 90 days to include standard lease to lease rent increases as well. We are given less than two weeks now! For example, for a May 1st lease renewal we are notified of the new rent increase at the end of February, and have to notify them within 60 days of lease end if we are leaving. So if you don't want to resign the new lease you only have less than 2 weeks to find a new property to lease from if the increase is not something you want to accept. (Since 60 days would be the last day of February. .) It will give renters a chance to find a competitive property to live in and more time to negociate a new lease with current landlord depending on the rent increase or changes to property ownership etc... Respondent No:22 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 23, 2021 19:22:21 pm Last Seen:Jul 24, 2021 02:08:38 am Q1.What is your relationship to the ordinance?I am a tenant / renter. Q2.Renters: Do you have concerns if an owner sells the property you are occupying? Q3.Owners: Will the Tenant Protection Plan affect the way you do business? Q4.Do you feel like 90 days is enough time to give or receive notices? Q5.What ways will this ordinance impact you? Provide positive impacts or potential challenges. Yes. Due to issues of affordability, desirability of location, the needs associated with my age, and challenges relating to relocation, I am concerned that a new owner may decide to redevelop the property or raise rents in ways that would necessitate my having to find new, comparable lodging. not answered While 90 days is acceptable, 120 days would be much better if I am forced to relocate. This ordinance would provide me with some protection should a new owner decide to redevelop the property or raise rents in such a way that would necessitate my having to find new, comparable lodging that satisfies the following criteria: Affordability, desirability of location, needs associated with my age, and eases the many daunting challenges relating to relocation. Respondent No:23 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 24, 2021 11:29:58 am Last Seen:Jul 24, 2021 18:26:36 pm Q1.What is your relationship to the ordinance?I am a tenant / renter. Q2.Renters: Do you have concerns if an owner sells the property you are occupying? Q3.Owners: Will the Tenant Protection Plan affect the way you do business? Q4.Do you feel like 90 days is enough time to give or receive notices? Q5.What ways will this ordinance impact you? Provide positive impacts or potential challenges. No. not answered I feel that in the current economic climate, 90 days out is too far. A 60 day notice should be sufficient It won't impact me but I worry it will impact rental management who are already under the strain of not having been able to evict renters due to state policies PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN I TENANT PROTECTION ORDINANCE I CITY OF EDINA 1 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN TENANT PROTECTION ORDINANCE DECISION TO BE MADE - Provide feedback on Tenant Protection Ordinance - Project Decision: Staff will provide feedback to City Council. PROJECT TIMELINE - July 6-23 for feedback on BetterTogtherEdina site - Feedback from BTE will be shared at the Ordinance first reading to Council on August 4th and again on August 17. STAKEHOLDERS - NOAH Property Landlords - NOAH Property Tenants - NOAH Property Owners - Edina Residents - Edina Neighbors for Affordable Housing (ENAH) - Minnesota Housing Association - Affordable Housing Manager and Community Health Staff ROLES RESIDENTS Provide feedback on desired attributes for the TPO - 60 day notice enough time for relocation? - Is the relocation payment if the 60-day notice is not given sufficient? To much? Too little? - How much notice do you need if your rent is going to be increased? - What are your concerns if the landlord sells the property? STAFF - Implementation of rental licensing policy - NOAH Property Inventory - Rental licensing enforcement review - Legal and safety requirements - Encourage preservation of NOAH properties within the community. - Assist in providing feedback to the process. - Provide information on process and roles for residents. CITY COUNCIL Decision-making body. - Receives feedback of concept. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN I TENANT PROTECTION ORDINANCE I CITY OF EDINA 2 - Decides if parameters of the TPO are acceptable. - Approves or decline ordinance PARTICIPATION LEVEL INVOLVE - Goal: To work directly with the public throughout the process to ensure the public concerns and aspirations are consistently understood and considered. - Promise: Keep the public informed, listen to concerns and ideas, provide feedback on how public input influences the decision. The staff will seek feedback on proposed Ordinance. DECISION CRITERIA IN SCOPE - Resident feedback will be provided to city council OUT OF SCOPE - Adding fines and other penalties outside of rental licensing directly into the TPO - Requiring landlord to notify the city of intent to sell NOAH properties. - Rental Licensing Policy Enforcement - Implementation timeline DECISIONS ALREADY MADE - TPO will be tied to the Rental Licensing policy OTHER CONSIDERATIONS - St. Paul is currently being sued over their TPO, the outcome of this case could possibly have ramifications for all TPO’s in Minnesota. - Edina is a Statutory City and bound by certain restrictions LEGAL OR TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS - Statutory City PUBLIC PARTICIPATION LEVEL: INVOLVE TECHNIQUES - Better Together Edina website PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN I TENANT PROTECTION ORDINANCE I CITY OF EDINA 3 DECISION PROCESS Objective Staff will inform people of the project and Ordinance process. The City will present the ordinance to the public and solicit feedback. Staff will consider feedback. Staff will make a recommendation to Council. Council decides. Staff will communicate the decision to the public. Staff will archive the project and process online. Anticipated Outcomes People know how and when to provide feedback. People have access to information. People have the ability to provide their feedback. People know how feedback was used. The recommended concept- level design is influenced by community values. People know what decision was made. People can view the information, process, and decision on the BetterTogetherEdina webpage. Timeline Summer 2021 Summer 2021 Summer 2021 Summer 2021 Present Ordinance and Feedback to City Council Public Participation -Ordinance Feedback Public Participation -Concept Feedback Staff Reviews & Discuss Implemnation of Ordinance Engage City Attorney to Draft Ordinance Introduce Ordinace to HRA Ordinance No. 2021-08 Tenant Protection Ordinance Tenant Protection Ordinance •The goal of a Tenant Protection Ordinance (TPO) is to protect lower-income tenants in Edina. Under the TPO, new owners of naturally occurring affordable housing buildings would be required to pay relocation benefits to tenants if the owner increases the rent, re-screens existing residents or implements non-renewals of leases without cause within the three-month period following the ownership transfer of the property and the tenant chooses to move due to these actions. EdinaMN.gov 2 A rental unit is affordable if the rent plus utilities being charged are less than or equal to the rates listed in the 60% Area Medium Income (AMI) column below from the Metropolitan Council Cost Burden •42.3% of renter households in Edina are considered cost burdened by spending more than 30% of their income on housing costs. EdinaMN.gov 3 Affordable Housing Housing Other (food,clothing,debt etc) 30% Why? •The April 2020 Maxfield Research study reported that Edina has nearly 700 affordable units at <60% AMI in NOAH rental properties that were built before 1970, it is likely that the sale of NOAH rental properties will increase. •A Tenant Protection Ordinance would reaffirm the city's goal promote and facilitate a balanced and enduring housing stock that offers a continuum of diverse life-cycle housing choices including the preservation of naturally occurring affordable housing (NOAH) EdinaMN.gov 4 Surrounding Cities •Tenant Protection Ordinances have already been passed by the following cities: Hopkins, MN (2019) St. Louis Park, MN (2018) Bloomington, MN (2019) Richfield, MN (2019) Golden Valley, MN (2019) EdinaMN.gov 5 Ordinance No. 2021-08 •What this ordinance does: Requires new owners to give notice to tenants of ownership within 30 days of date of sale. Requires a 90-day notice when a NOAH property is sold EdinaMN.gov 6 90-day Restrictions: Rent increase Re-screening of existing residents Implementation of non-renewals of leases without cause Violation of Ordinance No.2021-08 •Ordinance tied directly to the City's Rental Licensing Code •In accordance with Sec. 10-726 and Sec. 10-732(d), a violation of the ordinance may result in a revocation of the rental license an or a denial of renewal for rental license. EdinaMN.gov 7 Ordinance No. 2021-08 EdinaMN.gov 8 •What this ordinance does NOT do Set criteria and or guidelines for screening tenants Set rental prices or limits Restrict the sale of a NOAH property Community Engagement pt. 1 EdinaMN.gov 9 Community Engagement pt. 2 •July 2021 staff began soliciting feedback from the community. Social Media announcement made on Twitter, Facebook and Nextdoor 4000+ postcards mailed out to both renters and landlords of NOAH Properties Community feedback received via BetterTogtherEdina 20+ response from both renters and property owners EdinaMN.gov 10 Ordinance Feedback Form •Renters: Do you have concerns if an owner sells the property you are occupying? •Owners: Will the Tenant Protection Plan affect the way you do business? •Do you feel like 90 days is enough time to give or receive notices? •What ways will this ordinance impact you? Provide positive impacts or potential challenges. EdinaMN.gov 11 Responses •“I'm concerned I wouldn't find another place if I was priced out. This ordinance would help a bit, to give one time to prepare.” –Renter •“90 days notice is not unreasonable but anything more than that would be…”-Property Owner EdinaMN.gov 12 Questions? EdinaMN.gov 13 Date: August 17, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Ordinance No. 2021-09: Amending Chapter 26 Concerning Traffic and Vehicles Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Ordinance 2021-09 amending Chapter 26 of the Edina City Code regarding Traffic and Vehicles. INTRODUCTION: Council granted first reading of this ordinance at their August 4 regular meeting. See attached staff report and supporting documents. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Citywide Speed Limit Reduction, Aug. 4 Appendix A: Ordinance 2021-09 Appendix B: Technical Analysis Appendix C: Public Engagement Report Appendix D: Signage Plan Staff Presentation, Aug. 4 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 August 4, 2021 Mayor and City Council Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Citywide Speed Limit Reduction Approve Ordinance 2021-09 amending Chapter 26 of Edina City Code concerning Traffic and Vehicles and grant first reading. Approve the implementation plan to establish uniform changes to local speed limits. Executive Summary This report is a summary of the analysis undertaken to inform the City of Edina’s approach to setting speed limits on local streets in accordance with City policies and recent State legislative authority. The key findings and recommendations of this analysis are as follows; 1. The City is supportive of efforts to improve safety and mobility for all users and all modes of transportation. These goals are reflected in the Comprehensive Plan, the Living Streets Plan, the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan and the Active Routes to School Plan. 2. Reducing speed limits is one piece of a comprehensive strategy to address speeding, which will also require roadway redesign and new pedestrian, cyclist and transit infrastructure. 3. Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 2021-09, which will give the City Engineer the authority to establish speed limits on local streets in accordance with the provisions of State Statute 169.14. 4. Speed limits on most local streets will be reduced to 25 miles per hour (mph). 5. Implementation of reduced speed limits is estimated at $10,000, which includes traffic control signage and communication initiatives. These costs will be funded by the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund. 6. Installation of necessary traffic control signage is expected to be completed by the end of 2021. 7. Staff does not recommend additional enforcement or police resources as part of implementation. 8. The City will launch the “Drive 25” campaign through a variety of communication channels to educate the public on the new speed limits. 9. Staff will evaluate traffic and crash data two years before and after implementation and will prepare additional recommendations regarding enforcement, communication, and infrastructure. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 Background In 2006, Edina’s Transportation Commission recommended that City Council adopt a resolution recommending a 25-mph speed limit policy in residential areas. City staff, at the time, recommended instead that Council adopt a resolution supporting lowering the statutory urban residential speed limit from 30 to 25 mph. Council subsequently passed Resolution 2006-64, which stated that “the City of Edina does hereby strongly support a statewide lowering of the speed limit from 30 miles per hour to 25 miles per hour on local, residential roadways.” Rationale provided in the resolution included: • “Drivers traveling at high speeds are less aware of their surroundings and have less time to notice and react to pedestrians and bicyclists.” • “Relatively small increases in vehicle speed can greatly increase the chances that a pedestrian will die in a vehicle-to-pedestrian crash.” • “Experts on street design say that 20 to 25 miles per hour is the maximum safe speed for residential streets.” • “The City of Edina supports ensuring speed limits maximize safety for all roadway users including drivers, pedestrians and bicyclists.” In 2008, Council adopted Resolution 2008-27, requesting State Representative Ron Erhardt sponsor legislation granting permission to form a Speed Limit Task Force to begin a state-wide study of the feasibility of 25 mph speed limits and that said study be completed before the start of the 2009 legislative session. The 2008 Comprehensive Plan also included the following policy statements: • “Support state legislation to decrease statutory urban speed limits from 30 to 25 miles per hour.” • “Complete speed zone studies and establish speed zones for Safe Routes to School.” In 2009, the City received Safe Routes to School (SRTS) funding for implementation of a city-wide school speed zone study. This study was prepared by WSB & Associates, Inc. and evaluated conditions near six elementary schools, two middle schools, one high school and three private schools in Edina. The purpose of the study was to “determine and implement school speed zones adjacent to each school” and to “provide safe conditions to encourage students to walk and bike to school.” Council subsequently adopted Resolution 2009-66, adopting the Edina Schools Speed Zone Study and authorizing implementation of the recommended signage plan. New signage was installed prior to the start of the 2009/2010 school year. In 2012, the Transportation Commission wrote an advisory communication to Council recommending that the City revise its speed limit policy to be more consistent with current state legislation and “accurately communicate the authority the City has to reduce speed limits.” The Commission noted that the City had previously lowered speed limits on some local streets with bike lanes to 25 miles per hour and had established reduced speeds in school zones as permitted by state statute. Between 2013 and 2015, the City developed and adopted the Living Streets Policy and Plan. Living Streets balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability, REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 3 and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. Living Streets principles that guide the City’s approach to speed limits include: • “Living Streets are high-quality transportation facilities that meet the needs of the most vulnerable users such as pedestrians, cyclists, children, seniors and the disabled.” • “Living Streets provide access and mobility for all transportation modes while enhancing safety and convenience for all users.” • “Living Streets will improve the current and future quality of life of the public.” These principles are further echoed in the 2018 Comprehensive Plan, which notes that today’s primary transportation planning focus includes increasing safety and ensuring that the transportation needs of all users will be considered and all modes will be appropriately accommodated. Between 2011 and 2021, the City’s biennial Quality of Life survey asked residents to assess traffic concerns in their neighborhoods. About 38% of respondents on average expressed that speeding is a moderate-to- extreme problem in their neighborhood. In May 2019, the Minnesota Legislature passed and Governor Tim Walz signed legislation granting cities the authority to set speed limits on streets they control: “A city may establish speed limits for city streets under the city’s jurisdiction other than the limits provided in subdivision 2 without conducting an engineering and traffic investigation. This subdivision does not apply to town roads, county highways, or trunk highways in the city. A city that establishes speed limits pursuant to this section must implement speed limit changes in a consistent and understandable manner. The city must erect appropriate signs to display the speed limit. A city that uses the authority under this subdivision must develop procedures to set speed limits based on the city’s safety, engineering, and traffic analysis. At a minimum, the safety, engineering, and traffic analysis must consider national urban speed limit guidance and studies, local traffic crashes, and methods to effectively communicate the change to the public.” - Minnesota Statues, Section 169.14, Subd. 5h Existing Conditions The current speed limit on most Edina streets is 30 mph, the statutory urban speed limit (see Figure 1). Portions of Tracy Avenue, West 58th Street and West 70th Street have 25-mph speed limits due to the presence of on-street bicycle lanes (State Statute 160.263, Subd. 4 permits reducing speed limits no lower than 25 mph where bicycle lanes are established). Seven school zones (with speed limits between 20- and 15 mph when children are present) exist in Edina, adjacent to; Highlands Elementary, Our Lady of Grace Catholic School, Countryside Elementary, Creek Valley Elementary, Valley View Middle/Edina High, Concord Elementary/Normandale Elementary/South View Middle, and Cornelia Elementary Schools. Speed limits on Hennepin County roads range between 30 and 40 mph, and speed limits on MnDOT trunk highways are 55-60 mph. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 4 Figure 1: Existing Edina Speed Limits REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 5 Technical Analysis Staff performed a technical review of local traffic and crash data, as well as a review of national industry guidance on local speed limits. The key findings of this review include: 1. Most drivers on Local and Local Connector roads in Edina obey the posted speed limit. 2. Between 2015 and 2019, only one pedestrian fatality was reported in Edina along County Road 17 (France Avenue). 3. Accidents involving pedestrians or cyclists in Edina were relatively rare (less than 10%), but these accidents were more than three times as likely to result in a minor or serious injury compared to overall crashes. 4. Lower speeds reduce the likelihood and severity of motor vehicle crashes and promote public health and safety. 5. Utilizing the 85th percentile to set speed limits prioritizes motor vehicle traffic over the safety of all modes of transportation, including pedestrians and cyclists. 6. Citywide speed limits are generally easier to implement, may be easier for drivers to follow and are recommended where there is not clear differentiation between major and minor streets. The full technical review is attached in Appendix A. Recommended Speed Limits Staff recommends a uniform approach to setting local speed limits. The recommended limits are as follows: • 30 mph on four-lane major streets and other major streets with high non-local traffic; • 25 mph on two-lane major and minor streets; • 20 mph on major streets within School Zones; • 15 mph on minor streets within School Zones; and • 10 mph on alleys (no change from current restriction). Figure 2 shows all recommended speed limits on local streets in Edina. Speed limits on streets owned by other jurisdictions will remain as they are, unless changed by their respective agencies. These include streets owned by the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Hennepin County and private streets. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 6 Figure 2: Recommended Edina Speed Limits Public Engagement The City’s public engagement followed the protocols developed by the International Association for Public Participation (IAP2). Better Together Edina, the City’s online engagement platform, allowed residents to participate in the process online. In-person meetings and activities were not offered to comply with the REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 7 Governor’s Stay Safe Minnesota Order and to ensure the safety of all residents and staff during the COVID- 19 pandemic. The website allowed residents to provide feedback, ask questions and state informed about the project. Public input was collected in one of three manners; through Better Together Edina via the Feedback Form or the Map tools or via direct correspondence with City staff or Council; • 131 submissions were received through the Feedback Form tool. 52% (68) were generally supportive of the recommended speed limits, 24% (31) were generally unsupportive, and 14% (13) expressed support for speed limits lower than 25 mph. • 36 submissions were received through the Map tool. 17% (6) were supportive of the recommended speed limits, 53% (19) supported higher speed limits, and 30% (11) supported speed limits lower than 25 mph. Most streets recommended for higher speed limits were Municipal State Aid routes or collector streets, while most of streets recommended for lower speed limits were local, residential streets. • 19 items of direct correspondence were received by City staff or Council. Four supported the recommended speed limits, three were unsupportive, and six supported 20-mph speed limits to some degree. The full engagement report is attached in Appendix B. Considering all the public input, staff supports proceeding with implementation of speed limits as recommended. Despite the limited public engagement for this initiative, the City’s support for safety and mobility improvements is reflected in the Comprehensive Plan, the Living Streets Plan, the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan, and the Active Routes to School Plan. Transportation Commission Review The Transportation Commission reviewed the recommended speed limits at their December 17, 2020 regular meeting. Commissioners noted the limited level of public engagement through Better Together Edina, likely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, and suggested additional opportunities for public input. It was also noted that the recommended approach is not consistent with that of the neighboring Cities of Minneapolis and St. Louis Park. Commissioners noted the importance of police enforcement as part of implementation and asked if any changes are proposed on County Road 17 (France Avenue) which is often cited by residents as a traffic safety concern. Concerns were also raised regarding the cost of implementation, with some suggesting that the funds would be better spent to construct new pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure. Implementation In order to implement these changes, staff recommends the following actions; 1. Approve Ordinance 2021-09 (Appendix C) amending Chapter 26 of Edina City Code concerning Traffic and Vehicles and grant first reading. The ordinance was recommended by the City Attorney as the most appropriate method of establishing the City’s authority and is consistent with similar ordinances recently adopted by the Cities of Minneapolis and St. Louis Park. Given the statutory REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 8 requirement to set speed limits based on safety, engineering and traffic analysis, it is recommended that the City Engineer specifically be given this authority. 2. Approve the following implementation plan to establish uniform changes to local speed limits. It is important to note that a comprehensive approach to successfully address speeding requires multiple strategies. In addition to the steps outlined below, long-term success will only be achieved by continuing to implement the Living Streets and Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plans. This includes implementing minimum roadway widths and reallocating public right-of-way for pedestrian, cyclist and transit infrastructure. Physical changes to roadways will complement the lowered speed limits to reduce vehicle speeds, improve safety and mobility for all modes of transportation. Funding – Given the impact of this initiative on pedestrian and cyclist safety, staff recommends funding implementation using the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund. The 2021 budget has sufficient unallocated funds to cover the associated signage and communication costs, estimated at $10,000. Agency Coordination – Approximately eight miles of local streets in Edina have shared ownership with a neighboring city. Speed limits on streets shared with Bloomington, Richfield, Minneapolis, St. Louis Park and Hopkins are recommended to decrease. Staff is preparing cooperative agreements with these agencies to establish speed limits on these shared streets; these agreements will be brought to Council for approval at a later date. No changes are proposed for streets that are shared with or abut Eden Prairie and Minnetonka. Signage and Traffic Signal Modifications – As noted in the State Statute, cities “must erect appropriate signs to display the speed limit”. Approximately 245 traffic control signs will need to be removed, replaced or added to implement the recommended speed limits: • 8 new 15-mph signs (for School Zones) • 170 new 25-mph signs • 8 new 30-mph signs • 56 new gateway signs (see Figure 3) The new signage will be produced by a third-party vendor and Public Works Street Division will install them beginning in late August. Installation will start in the northeast quadrant, progressing to the southeast, northwest and southwest quadrants at a rate of approximately one quadrant per month. It is expected that all signage will be installed by the end of 2021. The full speed limit signage plan is attached in Appendix D. The new speed limits will require adjusted timing to certain traffic signals within Edina. Staff is coordinating with Minneapolis, Hennepin County and MnDOT to ascertain the extent of retiming necessary. Figure 3: Gateway Speed Limit Sign REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 9 Enforcement Strategy – Existing speed limits are enforced through verbal warnings and citations issued by the Edina Police Department at traffic stops. In an average year, EPD issues 14,200-16,500 citations; of these, approximately 52% (7,400-8,600) have a speed-related charge. The majority of citations occur on one of the major highways in Edina (66% in 2019). This suggests that about seven citations are written every day for a speed-related offense on local streets in Edina. EPD’s Traffic Division also utilizes a movable, radar speed trailer that informs drivers of their speed relative to the posted limit. Occasionally, targeted enforcement is used at specific locations during specific time frames where staff or residents have identified speeding concerns. A significant amount of public feedback was focused on police enforcement, with many believing that additional enforcement will be necessary for the new speed limits to be effective. However, there are two key reasons why staff does not favor that approach; 1. Existing traffic data indicates that most drivers on local roads in Edina are traveling at or below the posted speed limits. Average 85th percentile speeds observed on Local Connectors or Local streets were 30 and 25.4 mph, respectively; these two classifications account for 154 miles or 75% of all local streets in Edina. While there may still be perceived speeding concerns on these streets, most speeders are traveling on the remaining 25% of the local system, comprised of collectors and Municipal State Aid streets. 2. The most effective strategy to address speeding is to make physical changes to the streets and infrastructure. As noted in the U.S. Department of Justice’s 2009 Effective Policing and Crime Prevention guide; “the most important principle in speed control is that motorists tend to drive at the speed at which they feel safe and comfortable, given the road conditions. Therefore, the key to reducing speed is to alter road conditions such that motorists feel uncomfortable speeding.” Such alterations include narrowing streets, installing traffic calming devices or implementing other treatments that make the street appear narrower. These treatments are consistent with the guiding principles of the Living Streets Plan. For these reasons, staff does not recommend additional enforcement or police resources as part of implementation. Infrastructure changes and lowering the posted speed limit are more effective overall than increasing police enforcement. Communication Strategy – An informational and educational campaign will be needed for the remainder of 2021 as traffic signs are installed and replaced. The theme of the campaign will be “Drive 25,” referring to the new speed limit on most local streets and modeled after the “20 is Plenty” campaign used by cities like Minneapolis and St. Paul. To reach a wide and diverse audience, staff recommends utilizing several communication channels, as shown in Table 1. Some elements of the “Drive 25” campaign may be continued into early 2022, as well, to make clear to drivers the change in the local speed limit. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 10 August September October November December Print Publications • Edition: Edina story Website and Social Media • Website updates • Promoted social media posts ($50) • Edinet story • Nextdoor posts • City Extra emails • Promoted social media posts ($50) • Nextdoor posts • City extra emails • Promoted social media posts ($50) • Nextdoor posts • City extra emails • Promoted social media posts ($50) • Nextdoor posts • City extra emails • Promoted social media posts ($50) • Video • “Agenda: Edina” segment • Local public service announcement • YouTube ad of local PSA ($50) • YouTube ad of local PSA ($50) Marketing & Advertising • Posters ($50) • Double-sided business card for EPD to distribute • Backlit display at Southdale Center ($150) • Quarter-page ad in Edina Sun-Current ($350) • Backlit display at Southdale Center • Backlit display at Southdale Center Media & Public Relations • Press release • Tabling at events such as Centennial Lakes Farmers Market • Tabling at events such as Centennial Lakes Farmers Market • Tabling at events such as Halloboo • Tabling at events such as Pumpkin Smash and Bash • Tabling at events such as Edinborough Park New Year’s Party Table 1: “Drive 25” Education Campaign Evaluation Strategy – Staff will collect traffic data at various locations throughout the City in the years 2022 and 2023 to ascertain the effectiveness of the reduced speed limits. Because of the significant impact the COVID-19 pandemic had on traffic levels, staff recommends this 2-year evaluation period to differentiate the impact of the pandemic with the impact of the new speed limits. Data collected two years after REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 11 implementation will be compared to traffic data two years prior to implementation to evaluate the average change in vehicle speeds overall and the average change by roadway classification. Staff will also compare crash data on local streets two years before and after implementation to assess associated safety impacts. Staff will not recommend any changes to the posted speed limits until after the evaluation period, and may also make additional recommendations regarding enforcement, communication, and infrastructure. Appendix A: Technical Analysis Appendix B: Public Engagement Report Appendix C: Ordinance 2021-09 amending Chapter 26 of Edina City Code Appendix D: Signage Plan ORDINANCE NO. 2021-09 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 26 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING TRAFFIC AND VEHICLES THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 26, Article I of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following provisions: Sec. 26-7. – Regulation of Speed. (c) Speed on city streets. The city engineer may establish speed limits for city streets under the city’s jurisdiction in accordance with the provisions set forth at Minnesota Statutes Section 169.14. A comprehensive listing and the procedures relied upon to establish speed limits under this section shall be kept on file by the city engineer, and will be made readily available for public inspection. This ordinance is effective upon adoption. First reading: August 4, 2021 Second reading: August 17, 2021 Published: Attest: ________________________ __________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE EDINA SUN CURRENT. SEND TWO AFFIDAVITS OF PUBLICATION BILL TO EDINA CITY CLERK. Technical Analysis National Research and Guidance National Transportation Safety Board In 2017, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) published “Reducing Speeding-Related Crashes Involving Passenger Vehicles,” a safety study examining causes, trends and countermeasures to prevent these types of crashes. The findings of this study include: • “Speed increases the likelihood of serious and fatal crash involvement, although the exact relationship is complex due to many factors.” • “Speed increases the injury severity of a crash.” • The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) guidance for setting speed limits in speed zones is based on the 85th percentile speed, but there is not strong evidence that, within a given traffic flow, the 85th-percentile speed equates to the speed with the lowest crash involvement rate on all road types.” • “Unintended consequences of the reliance on using the 85th-percentile speed for changing speed limits in speed zones include higher operating speeds and new higher, 85th-percentile speeds in the speed zones, and an increase in operating speeds outside the speed zones.” • “The safe system approach to setting speed limits in urban areas is an improvement over conventional approaches because it considers the vulnerability of all road users.” Among the recommendations of this report is for a revision to the MUTCD to “incorporate the safe system approach for urban roads to strengthen protection for vulnerable road users.” National Association of City Transportation Officials The National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) identifies two different approaches for setting urban speed limits. Citywide Under this approach, a city designates a speed limit that applies to all roadways within their jurisdiction. NACTO recommends a 25-mph speed limit for this strategy. “Setting or lowering default citywide speed limits is an inexpensive, scalable way to quickly improve safety outcomes, and establish a basis for larger safety gains. Default citywide limits also provide consistent expectations and messages about speed across the jurisdiction, which is easy for drivers to follow.” Category of Street Under this approach, a city develops a tiered system of speed limits. NACTO recommends the following tiered system: • 25 mph on Major streets. “Major streets feature a combination of high motor vehicle traffic volume, signalization of major intersection, and an inherently multimodal street environment.” • 20 mph on Minor streets. “Minor streets include physically small streets where low speeds are often already present, as well as low-vehicle-volume streets with few or no transit stops.” • 10 mph on alleys and shared streets “Citywide speed limits are generally easier to implement and may be easier for driver to follow. However, in cities where there is clear differentiation between major arterial streets and local or minor streets, setting speed limits based on category of street can sometimes allow cities to lower speed limits on a large number of streets below what would be allowable citywide (i.e. 20 mph on minor streets vs. 25 mph citywide). If cities have the authority to set default speed limits, they should decide whether to implement citywide limits or category limits based on what makes sense given the local conditions.” Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), published by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), defines the standards used to install and maintain traffic control devices on public transportation systems. The current MUTCD includes the following standards and guidance related to speed limits: • “Speed zones (other than statutory speed limits) shall only be established on the basis of an engineering study that has been performed in accordance with traffic engineering practices. The engineering study shall include an analysis of the current speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles.” • “The Speed Limit sign…shall display the limit established by law, ordinance, regulation or as adopted by the authorized agency based on the engineering study. The speed limits displayed shall be in multiples of 5 mph.” • “State and local agencies should conduct engineering studies to reevaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways that have undergone significant changes since the last review, such as the addition or elimination of parking or driveways, changes in traffic control signal coordination, or significant changes in traffic volumes.” • “When a speed limit within a speed zone is poster, it should be within 5 mph of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic.” • “Other factors that may be considered when establishing or reevaluating speed limits are the following: A. Road characteristics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance; B. The pace; C. Roadside development and environment; D. Parking practices and pedestrian activity; and E. Reported crash experience for at least a 12-month period” The National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (NCUTD) recently recommended changes to the current MUTCD guidance related to speed limits to the FHWA. These recommendations included: • Removing the standard that “the engineering study shall include an analysis of the current speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles.” • Upgrading and revising the considerations for establishing speed zones to read “Factors that should be considered when establishing or reevaluating speed limits within speed zones are the following: A. Speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles (such as current 85th percentile, the pace, and review of past speed studies) B. Reported crash experience for at least a 12-month period relative to similar roadways C. Road characteristics (such as lane widths, curb/shoulder condition, grade, alignment, median type, and sight distance) D. Road context (such as roadside development and environment including number of driveways and land use, functional classification, parking practices, presence of sidewalks/bicycle facilities) E. Road users (such as pedestrian activity, bicycle activity). • Revising the guidance statement regarding the posted speed limit being made within 5 mph of the 85th percentile speed to apply only “on freeways, expressways, or rural highways.” The FHWA will consider whether to incorporate these recommendations into the next edition of the MUTCD. MnDOT utilizes a slightly different version referred to as the MN MUTCD. Both documents are identical in language related to speed limits. If the MUTCD is updated, it is anticipated that the MN MUTCD will be updated accordingly. Safety Implications Vehicle stopping distance is an important factor in the likelihood of a crash. Figure 1 shows the correlation between vehicle speed and average stopping distance as calculated by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). For example, a reduction from 30 to 20 mph results in an additional 85 feet (or about 5 car lengths) of stopping distance. Figure 1. Average Stopping Distance vs. Speed (AASHTO) Exact stopping distance calculations vary depending on specific reaction times and braking speed, but when controlling for those variables, higher speeds always result in longer stopping distances. 80 112 151 197 247 301 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 15 20 25 30 35 40 Average Stopping Distance, feetVehicle Speed, mph Speed also impacts the severity of injury resulting from crashes, particularly for pedestrians and cyclists. Figure 2 compares vehicle speeds to the likelihood of severe injury or death to a pedestrian in an accident. This data is taken from the US Department of Transportation, though multiple other agencies have conducted comparable studies with similar results. Figure 2. Pedestrian Injury Risk vs. Speed It’s also important to note that other factors contribute to the level of risk, including the age of the pedestrian. Speed Limit Changes by Other Cities New York City, NY The statutory urban speed limit in the State of New York is 30 mph. In 2014, New York City lowered the majority of local speed limits from 30 to 25 mph. Some quieter residential areas, or “slow zones” were kept at 20 mph and some larger streets have speed limits higher than 25 mph. Seattle, WA The statutory urban speed limit in the State of Washington is 25 mph. in 2016, Seattle adopted a tiered system for local speed limits; 25 mph for arterial streets and 20 mph for residential streets unless otherwise signed. In addition, Seattle has been lowering speed limits on busier streets in recent years, piloting the use of the 50th percentile speed rather than the 85th to set speed limits. Following implementation of these changes on downtown streets, Seattle experienced a 13% reduction in total crashes and a 20% reduction in fatal and serious injury crashes. Portland, OR The statutory urban speed limit in the State of Oregon is 25 mph. Portland has also implemented a tiered system for local speed limits between 2016 and 2018; 15-25 mph for residential districts, 20 mph for school zones, 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 20 30 40 Likelihood of Severe Injury or Death, %Vehicle Speed, mph business districts and arterial streets and 15 mph for alleys. Changes made to local speed limits require approval from the Oregon Department of Transportation. Boston, MA The statutory urban speed limit in the State of Massachusetts is 25 mph. In 2017, Boston lowered speed limits citywide from 30 to 25 mph. A study conducted in 2018 by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety concluded that “lowering the speed limit in urban areas is an effective countermeasure to reduce speeds and improve safety for all road users.” Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN In 2020, the Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul implemented tiered systems for local speed limits; 25 mph for major streets (mixed-use, commercial and downtown streets) and 20 mph for minor streets (industrial and residential streets). Both cities intend for these changes to make streets safer for all users and to support their Vision Zero goal of zero traffic deaths or severe injuries. St. Louis Park, MN In 2021, the City of St. Louis Park will begin implementing a tiered system for local speed limits like that of neighboring Minneapolis with a default speed limit of 20 mph. St. Louis Park’s initiative is intended to promote a mobility system that prioritizes walking first, then bicycling and transit, and then motor vehicle use. Local Traffic/Crash Analysis Staff reviewed local traffic data collected between 2016 and 2019. This data was reviewed based on the roadway classifications identified in the Living Streets Plan; Minor Arterial, Collector, Local Connector or Local road (see Table 1). Roadway Classification Average Daily Traffic, vpd Data Points 85th Percentile Speed Range, mph Average 85th Percentile Speed, mph Minor Arterial 4,500 – 15,000 5 36.5 – 41.9 39.5 Collector 1,200 – 10,300 56 21.6 – 39.0 32.7 Local Connector 250 – 3,000 46 23.5 – 35.2 30.0 Local 30 – 1,200 64 17.9 - 32.5 25.4 Table 1: Local Traffic Analysis, 2016-2019 Relevant findings from this analysis include: 1. 85th percentile speeds tend to decrease as roadway classification and traffic volumes decrease. 2. The majority of drivers on Local and Local Connector roads obey the posted speed limit (most of these roads are currently 30 mph). 3. Wider roads (Minor Arterials and Collectors) tend to have higher speeds than narrower roads (Local Connectors and Locals). 4. Highway frontage roads tend to have the highest recorded speeds (8 of the 10 highest observed 85th percentile speeds were on frontage roads adjacent to Highways 100, 169 and 494. Crash data from the Minnesota Department of Public Safety was used to review local traffic accidents. This analysis included reported accidents on County, Municipal State Aid and local roads in Edina over a 5-year period between 2015 and 2019. Relevant findings from this analysis include: 1. Accidents were generally concentrated at intersections and along high-volume roads. 2. More than 50% of accidents on Municipal State Aid or local roads occurred at intersections. 3. Nearly all (96%) of accidents on Municipal State Aid or local roads occurred under a posted speed limit of 30 mph. 4. Only one fatal crash was reported over this time period; a pedestrian was struck and killed on France Avenue in 2016. 5. Proportionately, the severity of accidents was similar regardless of roadway type, with the majority resulting merely in property damage (see Table 2). Crash Severity Local Roads Municipal State Aid Roads County Roads Property Damage 70.9% 67.9% 67.4% Possible Injury 17.3% 16.9% 16.7% Minor Injury 9.8% 13.6% 13.4% Serious Injury 1.7% 1.4% 1.8% Fatality - - 0.2% Unknown 0.3% 0.2% 0.5% Table 2. Local Crash Analysis, 2015-2019 6. Most accidents had no clear contributing action reported. Regardless of roadway type, distracted driving, failing to yield the right-of-way, and running red lights were generally reported more frequently than speeding. 7. Accidents involving pedestrians or cyclists were relatively rare (less than 10%) and generally occurred along County or Municipal State Aid roads. The greatest concentration of these is in the southeast quadrant of Edina, primarily along France Avenue and York Avenue. 8. Accidents involving a pedestrian or cyclist were more than three times as likely to result in a minor or serious injury compared to overall crashes. ENGAGEMENT REPORT I LOCAL SPEED LIMIT EVALUATION I CITY OF EDINA 1 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT REPORT PROJECT: LOCAL SPEED LIMIT EVALUATION Date: February 10, 2021 ENGAGEMENT PLAN DECISION TO BE MADE - Decide on the City’s approach to change local speed limits - Project Decision: Staff will make a recommendation to City Council PROJECT TIMELINE - October 2020 o Public comment period on Better Together Edina - December 17, 2020 o Transportation Commission review of public engagement report and updated staff recommendation - February 17, 2021 o City Council review of public engagement report and updated staff recommendation o City Council authorizes development of implementation plan - February-March 2021 o Staff develops implementation plan PARTICIPATON LEVEL CONSULT - Goal: We will work directly with the public throughout the process to ensure that public concerns and aspirations are consistently understood and considered. - Promise: We will work to ensure that your concerns and aspirations are directly reflected in the alternatives developed and provide feedback on how public input influenced the decision. PROCESS 1. Draft Recommendation 2. Public Comment Period 3. Review/Approval of Updated Recommendation 4. Close the Loop 5. Develop Implementation Plan ENGAGEMENT REPORT I LOCAL SPEED LIMIT EVALUATION I CITY OF EDINA 2 STAKEHOLDERS - Edina residents - Edina commuters - Transportation Commission - Cities of Minneapolis, Richfield, Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, Hopkins, St. Louis Park PROJECT BACKGROUND Effective August 1, 2019, Minnesota cities have the authority to set speed limits on streets they control. The City is proposing to use this new authority to change speed limits on local streets. The current speed limit on most Edina streets is 30 miles per hour (mph). The current local speed limits in Edina are attached in Appendix A. About 40% of residents regularly express concern about speeding in their neighborhoods in the City's Quality of Life survey. The City is supportive of efforts to improve safety and mobility for all users and all modes of transportation. These goals are reflected in the Comprehensive Plan, the Living Streets Plan, the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan and the Active Routes to School Plan. Staff performed a technical review of local traffic and crash data, as well as a review of national industry guidance on local speed limits. The general findings of this review include; The majority of drivers on Local and Local Connector roads in Edina obey the posted speed limit (most are 30 mph). Between 2015 and 2019, only one pedestrian fatality was reported in Edina along County Road 17 (France Avenue). Accidents involving pedestrians or cyclists in Edina were relatively rare (less than 10%), but these accidents are more than three times as likely to result in a minor or serious injury compared to overall crashes. Lower speeds reduce the likelihood and severity of motor vehicle crashes and promote public health and safety. Utilizing 85th percentile to set speed limits prioritizes motor vehicle traffic over the safety of all modes of transportation, including pedestrians and cyclists. Citywide speed limits are generally easier to implement, may be easier for drivers to follow and are recommended where there is not clear differentiation between major and minor streets. The full technical review is attached in Appendix B. Staff recommends a uniform approach to setting local speed limits. The recommended speed limits are as follows: 30 mph on four-lane major streets and other major streets with high non-local traffic 25 mph on two-lane major and minor streets 20 mph on major streets within School Zones (no change from current restriction) 15 mph in minor streets within School Zones (no change from current restriction) 10 mph on alleys (no change from current restriction) Speed limits on streets owned by other jurisdictions will remain as they are, unless changed by their respective agencies. These include streets owned by the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Hennepin County and private streets. Appendix C shows all recommended speed limits on local roads in Edina. ENGAGEMENT REPORT I LOCAL SPEED LIMIT EVALUATION I CITY OF EDINA 3 The City’s public engagement followed protocols developed by the International Association for Public Participation. Better Together Edina, the City’s online engagement platform, allowed residents to participate in the process online. In-person meetings and activities were not offered in order to comply with the Governor’s Stay Safe Minnesota Order and to ensure the safety of all residents and staff during the COVID-19 pandemic. The website allowed residents to provide feedback, ask questions and stay up-to-date the project. The following report includes feedback submitted through Better Together Edina and direct correspondence together to show that all input was equally valuable. The final recommendation was influenced by the feedback received as well as traffic analysis, local policies and national guidance. BETTER TOGETHER EDINA PROJECT PAGE Oct 31 - Site Visits: 999 - Aware Visitors: 825 - Informed Visitors: 478 - Engaged Visitors: 138 Dec 10 - Site Visits: 1.1K - Aware Visitors: 867 - Informed Visitors: 492 - Engaged Visitors: 138 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SUMMARY The public input was collected in one of three manners; through Better Together Edina via the Feedback Form or Map tools or via direct correspondence with City staff. FEEDBACK FORM The Feedback Form tool allowed members of the public to submit general comments on the recommended local speed limits. 131 submissions were received through this tool. Staff reviewed each response and assigned each to one of four general categories. 68 responses (or 51.9%) were generally supportive of the current recommendation, while 31 responses (or 23.7%) were generally unsupportive. Additionally, 18 responses (or 13.7%) expressed support for lower speed limits than the 25-mph minimum recommended by staff. Some of these responses specifically noted that neighboring cities like Minneapolis and St. Louis Park have implemented or are in the process of implementing local speed limits as low as 20 mph. 14 responses (or 10.7%) were categorized as Other. These responses included specific observations and questions that did not appear to express an opinion on the recommendation (either supportive or unsupportive). Figure 1 shows the distribution of Feedback Form responses received. ENGAGEMENT REPORT I LOCAL SPEED LIMIT EVALUATION I CITY OF EDINA 4 In total, 86 responses (nearly 2/3) were supportive of lowering local speed limits in Edina to some degree. In addition to expressed support or opposition to the proposed speed limits, members of the public also used this tool to ask questions, share general observations and offer other suggestions. Table 1 provides a high-level summary of the most frequent comments or questions submitted through the Feedback Form along with staff’s response. Table 1: Feedback Form Frequent Comments/Questions Resident Comments/Questions Staff Response How does the City plan to enforce lower speed limits? For most streets, additional enforcement efforts will not be necessary as data indicates drivers are traveling at or below the posted 30-mph limit. Engineering staff will discuss potential enforcement strategies with Edina Police Department. Specific streets or entire residential neighborhoods should have even lower speed restrictions (20 mph) More restrictive speed limits in certain areas would result in additional signage costs and could lead to driver confusion. Staff only recommends more restrictive speed limits in school zones or where the geometry of the street requires an advisory speed limit as recommended by the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. How much will it cost for new speed limit signage City-wide? Engineering staff will evaluate the estimated cost of new signage based on the approach approved by City Council. The City should implement speed bumps on streets to address speed concerns. It is not standard practice to install permanent speed bumps on public roadways. While various studies have shown that can provide speed reduction in their immediate vicinity, they are a significant hindrance to snow plowing operations. 51.9% 13.7% 23.7% 10.7% Figure 1: Feedback Form Results Supportive of current recommendation Supportive of 20-mph speed limits Unsupportive of current recommendation Other ENGAGEMENT REPORT I LOCAL SPEED LIMIT EVALUATION I CITY OF EDINA 5 Request for stop signs to lower vehicle speeds in residential areas. Stops signs are used to assign right-of-way to vehicles at an intersection, not to control speed or volume. There are industry standards for when stop signs should be installed based on traffic volumes and physical obstructions to sightlines. Unwarranted stop signs tend to have a high rate of non-compliance. To make specific requests for stop signs, residents are encouraged to submit a Traffic Safety Request through the City’s website or the Edina 311 mobile application. The City should install more pedestrian-activated flashers at school crossings. The City’s Pedestrian Crossing Policy provides guidance on when treatments like activated flashers are warranted based on traffic volumes and roadway characteristics. To make specific requests for crossing treatments, residents are encouraged to submit a Traffic Safety Request through the City’s website or the Edina 311 mobile application. The City should reduce four-lane streets down to two-lane and provide additional facilities for pedestrians and cyclists. Commonly referred to as a ‘road diet’, this type of lane configuration change would only be warranted where two lanes can accommodate the traffic volumes. The City will continue to look for streets that fit this criterion and identify future implementation projects. The complete Feedback Form submissions are attached in Appendix D. MAP The Map tool allowed members of the public to comment on recommended speed limits for specific streets via an interactive map. To comment, users could place a pin on a specific street to indicate their preferred speed limit (20, 25, 30 or 35 mph). 36 submissions were received through this tool, with roughly half (17) placed on local streets and half (19) placed on Municipal State Aid or collector streets. Staff reviewed each pin and categorized each based on the roadway classification and how the suggested speed limit compared to the recommended speed limit (higher, equal or lower). Figure 2 shows the distribution of Map responses received. ENGAGEMENT REPORT I LOCAL SPEED LIMIT EVALUATION I CITY OF EDINA 6 6 submissions (16.7%) were supportive of specific recommended speed limits, 19 (52.8%) suggested higher speed limits and 11 (30.5%) suggested lower speed limits. Looking specifically at the pins placed on MSA streets, an overwhelming majority (84.2%) suggested higher speed limits. Most comments suggested 30 mph on MSA streets, noting that these are main travel corridors and should be given higher speed limits than local streets to deter non- local traffic in residential neighborhoods. Of the pins placed on local streets, a significant majority (58.8%) suggested lower speed limits. Most comments suggested 20 mph on local streets, noting that many experience non-local traffic and are devoid of separated pedestrian or bicycle infrastructure. The complete Map submissions are attached in Appendix E. DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE Members of the public also provided feedback in the form of direct correspondence with staff and City Council. 19 items of direct correspondence were received. Of these, four were supportive of the recommendation, three were unsupportive, and six were specific observations and questions that did not appear to express an opinion on the recommendation. Additionally, six submissions expressed support for 20-mph speed limits to some degree. All received correspondence is included in Appendix F. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Considering all the public input, staff recommends proceeding with implementation of uniform speed limits as originally presented. This approach is less expensive than a tiered approach and is a scalable way to quickly improve safety outcomes. Uniform citywide speed limits provide consistent expectations about speed, which are easier for drivers to follow. It is important to note that a comprehensive approach to successfully address speeding requires multiple strategies. Drivers are influenced by the geometric characteristics of a roadway as well as the posted speed limit. In addition to these recommended speed limits, staff recommends continuing to implement the Living Streets Plan and the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan with pavement management projects when feasible. This includes implementing minimum roadway width design standards and reallocation of right-of-way for pedestrian and 19 16 3 6 2 4 11 1 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Total MSA LocalResponses Received Figure 2: Map Results Higher Equal Lower ENGAGEMENT REPORT I LOCAL SPEED LIMIT EVALUATION I CITY OF EDINA 7 bicycle infrastructure. Physical changes to roadways will complement the lowered speed limits to reduce vehicle speeds and improve safety for all modes of transportation. NEXT STEPS CITY COUNCIL Approve staff’s recommendation to implement uniform changes to local speed limits and authorize development of an implementation plan. CITY STAFF With Council approval, Engineering staff will work with Public Works, Police and Communications staff to develop the following components of an implementation plan; - Signage and traffic signal modifications - Enforcement strategy - Communication strategy - Evaluation strategy APPENDICES A. Existing Speed Limits B. Technical Analysis C. Proposed Speed Limits D. Feedback Form Submissions E. Map Submissions F. Direct Correspondence BLAKE RDSCHAEFER RDVERNON AVEFRANCE AVE SXERXES AVE SCAHILL RD70TH ST W 66TH ST W YORK AVE SINTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 4 4 T H S T W 50TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST W GLEASON RD70TH ST W 76TH ST W DEWEY HILL RD VALLEY VIEW RD VALLEY VIEW RD MINNESOTA DR78TH ST W HWY 100HWY 169HWY 169HWY 100HWY 62 HWY 62 City of EdinaExisting Speed Limits / Engineering DeptJuly 2020 Other Jurisdiction 55 mph 40 mph 30 mph 25 mph 20 mph (School Zone) 15 mph (School Zone)35 mph Technical Analysis Background In 2006, Edina’s Transportation Commission recommended that City Council adopt a resolution recommending a 25-mph speed limit policy in residential areas. City staff, at the time, instead recommended that Council adopt a resolution supporting lowering the statutory urban residential speed limit from 30 to 25 mph. Council subsequently passed Resolution 2006-64, which stated that “the City of Edina does hereby strongly support a statewide lowering of the speed limit from 30 miles per hour to 25 miles per hour on local, residential roadways.” Rationale provided in the resolution included: “Drivers traveling at high speeds are less aware of their surroundings and have less time to notice and react to pedestrians and bicyclists.” “Relatively small increases in vehicle speed can greatly increase the chances that a pedestrian will die in a vehicle-to-pedestrian crash.” “Experts on street design say that 20 to 25 miles per hour is the maximum safe speed for residential streets.” “The City of Edina supports ensuring speed limits maximize safety for all roadway users including drivers, pedestrians and bicyclists.” In 2008, Council adopted Resolution 2008-27, requesting State Representative Ron Erhardt sponsor legislation granting permission to form a Speed Limit Task Force to begin a state-wide study of the feasibility of 25 mph speed limits and that said study be completed before the start of the 2009 legislative session. The 2008 Comprehensive Plan also included the following policy statements: “Support state legislation to decrease statutory urban speed limits from 30 to 25 miles per hour.” “Complete speed zone studies and establish speed zones for Safe Routes to School.” In 2009, the City received Safe Routes to School (SRTS) funding for implementation of a city-wide school speed zone study. This study was prepared by WSB & Associates, Inc. and evaluated conditions near six elementary schools, two middle schools, one high school and three private schools in Edina. The purpose of the study was to “determine and implement school speed zones adjacent to each school” and to “provide safe conditions to encourage students to walk and bike to school.” Council subsequently adopted Resolution 2009-66, adopting the Edina Schools Speed Zone Study and authorizing implementation of the recommended signage plan. New signage was installed prior to the start of the 2009/2010 school year. In 2012, the Transportation Commission wrote an advisory communication to Council recommending that the City revise its speed limit policy to be more consistent with current state legislation and “accurately communicate the authority the City has to reduce speed limits.” The Commission noted that the City had previously lowered speed limits on some local streets with bike lanes to 25 miles per hour and had established reduced speeds in school zones as permitted by state statute. Between 2013 and 2015, the City developed and adopted the Living Streets Policy and Plan. Living Streets balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. Living Streets principles that guide the City’s approach to speed limits include: “Living Streets are high-quality transportation facilities that meet the needs of the most vulnerable users such as pedestrians, cyclists, children, seniors and the disabled.” “Living Streets provide access and mobility for all transportation modes while enhancing safety and convenience for all users.” “Living Streets will improve the current and future quality of life of the public.” These principles are further echoed in the draft 2018 Comprehensive Plan, which notes that today’s primary transportation planning focus includes increasing safety and ensuring that the transportation needs of all users will be considered and all modes will be appropriately accommodated. Between 2011 and 2019, the City’s biennial Quality of Life survey asked residents to assess traffic concerns in their neighborhoods. About 40% of residents have consistently expressed that speeding is a moderate-to-extreme problem in their neighborhood. In May 2019, the Minnesota Legislature passed and Governor Tim Walz signed legislation granting cities the authority to set speed limits on streets they control: “A city may establish speed limits for city streets under the city’s jurisdiction other than the limits provided in subdivision 2 without conducting an engineering and traffic investigation. This subdivision does not apply to town roads, county highways, or trunk highways in the city. A city that establishes speed limits pursuant to this section must implement speed limit changes in a consistent and understandable manner. The city must erect appropriate signs to display the speed limit. A city that uses the authority under this subdivision must develop procedures to set speed limits based on the city’s safety, engineering, and traffic analysis. At a minimum, the safety, engineering, and traffic analysis must consider national urban speed limit guidance and studies, local traffic crashes, and methods to effectively communicate the change to the public.” - Minnesota Statues, Section 169.14, Subd. 5h National Research and Guidance National Transportation Safety Board In 2017, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) published “Reducing Speeding-Related Crashes Involving Passenger Vehicles,” a safety study examining causes, trends and countermeasures to prevent these types of crashes. The findings of this study include: “Speed increases the likelihood of serious and fatal crash involvement, although the exact relationship is complex due to many factors.” “Speed increases the injury severity of a crash.” The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) guidance for setting speed limits in speed zones is based on the 85th percentile speed, but there is not strong evidence that, within a given traffic flow, the 85th-percentile speed equates to the speed with the lowest crash involvement rate on all road types.” “Unintended consequences of the reliance on using the 85th-percentile speed for changing speed limits in speed zones include higher operating speeds and new higher, 85th-percentile speeds in the speed zones, and an increase in operating speeds outside the speed zones.” “The safe system approach to setting speed limits in urban areas is an improvement over conventional approaches because it considers the vulnerability of all road users.” Among the recommendations of this report is for a revision to the MUTCD to “incorporate the safe system approach for urban roads to strengthen protection for vulnerable road users.” National Association of City Transportation Officials The National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) identifies two different approaches for setting urban speed limits. Citywide Under this approach, a city designates a speed limit that applies to all roadways within their jurisdiction. NACTO recommends a 25-mph speed limit for this strategy. “Setting or lowering default citywide speed limits is an inexpensive, scalable way to quickly improve safety outcomes, and establish a basis for larger safety gains. Default citywide limits also provide consistent expectations and messages about speed across the jurisdiction, which is easy for drivers to follow.” Category of Street Under this approach, a city develops a tiered system of speed limits. NACTO recommends the following tiered system: 25 mph on Major streets. “Major streets feature a combination of high motor vehicle traffic volume, signalization of major intersection, and an inherently multimodal street environment.” 20 mph on Minor streets. “Minor streets include physically small streets where low speeds are often already present, as well as low-vehicle-volume streets with few or no transit stops.” 10 mph on alleys and shared streets “Citywide speed limits are generally easier to implement and may be easier for driver to follow. However, in cities where there is clear differentiation between major arterial streets and local or minor streets, setting speed limits based on category of street can sometimes allow cities to lower speed limits on a large number of streets below what would be allowable citywide (i.e. 20 mph on minor streets vs. 25 mph citywide). If cities have the authority to set default speed limits, they should decide whether to implement citywide limits or category limits based on what makes sense given the local conditions.” Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), published by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), defines the standards used to install and maintain traffic control devices on public transportation systems. The current MUTCD includes the following standards and guidance related to speed limits: “Speed zones (other than statutory speed limits) shall only be established on the basis of an engineering study that has been performed in accordance with traffic engineering practices. The engineering study shall include an analysis of the current speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles.” “The Speed Limit sign…shall display the limit established by law, ordinance, regulation or as adopted by the authorized agency based on the engineering study. The speed limits displayed shall be in multiples of 5 mph.” “State and local agencies should conduct engineering studies to reevaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways that have undergone significant changes since the last review, such as the addition or elimination of parking or driveways, changes in traffic control signal coordination, or significant changes in traffic volumes.” “When a speed limit within a speed zone is poster, it should be within 5 mph of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic.” “Other factors that may be considered when establishing or reevaluating speed limits are the following: A. Road characteristics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance; B. The pace; C. Roadside development and environment; D. Parking practices and pedestrian activity; and E. Reported crash experience for at least a 12-month period” The National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (NCUTD) recently recommended changes to the current MUTCD guidance related to speed limits to the FHWA. These recommendations included: Removing the standard that “the engineering study shall include an analysis of the current speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles.” Upgrading and revising the considerations for establishing speed zones to read “Factors that should be considered when establishing or reevaluating speed limits within speed zones are the following: A. Speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles (such as current 85th percentile, the pace, and review of past speed studies) B. Reported crash experience for at least a 12-month period relative to similar roadways C. Road characteristics (such as lane widths, curb/shoulder condition, grade, alignment, median type, and sight distance) D. Road context (such as roadside development and environment including number of driveways and land use, functional classification, parking practices, presence of sidewalks/bicycle facilities) E. Road users (such as pedestrian activity, bicycle activity). Revising the guidance statement regarding the posted speed limit being made within 5 mph of the 85th percentile speed to apply only “on freeways, expressways, or rural highways.” The FHWA will consider whether to incorporate these recommendations into the next edition of the MUTCD. MnDOT utilizes a slightly different version referred to as the MN MUTCD. Both documents are identical in language related to speed limits. If the MUTCD is updated, it is anticipated that the MN MUTCD will be updated accordingly. Safety Implications Vehicle stopping distance is an important factor in the likelihood of a crash. Figure 1 shows the correlation between vehicle speed and average stopping distance as calculated by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). For example, a reduction from 30 to 20 mph results in an additional 85 feet (or about 5 car lengths) of stopping distance. Figure 1. Average Stopping Distance vs. Speed (AASHTO) Exact stopping distance calculations vary depending on specific reaction times and braking speed, but when controlling for those variables, higher speeds always result in longer stopping distances. 80 112 151 197 247 301 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 15 20 25 30 35 40 Average Stopping Distance, feetVehicle Speed, mph Speed also impacts the severity of injury resulting from crashes, particularly for pedestrians and cyclists. Figure 2 compares vehicle speeds to the likelihood of severe injury or death to a pedestrian in an accident. This data is taken from the US Department of Transportation, though multiple other agencies have conducted comparable studies with similar results. Figure 2. Pedestrian Injury Risk vs. Speed It’s also important to note that other factors contribute to the level of risk, including the age of the pedestrian. Speed Limit Changes by Other Cities New York City, NY The statutory urban speed limit in the State of New York is 30 mph. In 2014, New York City lowered the majority of local speed limits from 30 to 25 mph. Some quieter residential areas, or “slow zones” were kept at 20 mph and some larger streets have speed limits higher than 25 mph. Seattle, WA The statutory urban speed limit in the State of Washington is 25 mph. in 2016, Seattle adopted a tiered system for local speed limits; 25 mph for arterial streets and 20 mph for residential streets unless otherwise signed. In addition, Seattle has been lowering speed limits on busier streets in recent years, piloting the use of the 50th percentile speed rather than the 85th to set speed limits. Following implementation of these changes on downtown streets, Seattle experienced a 13% reduction in total crashes and a 20% reduction in fatal and serious injury crashes. Portland, OR The statutory urban speed limit in the State of Oregon is 25 mph. Portland has also implemented a tiered system for local speed limits between 2016 and 2018; 15-25 mph for residential districts, 20 mph for school zones, 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 20 30 40 Likelihood of Severe Injury or Death, %Vehicle Speed, mph business districts and arterial streets and 15 mph for alleys. Changes made to local speed limits require approval from the Oregon Department of Transportation. Boston, MA The statutory urban speed limit in the State of Massachusetts is 25 mph. In 2017, Boston lowered speed limits citywide from 30 to 25 mph. A study conducted in 2018 by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety concluded that “lowering the speed limit in urban areas is an effective countermeasure to reduce speeds and improve safety for all road users.” Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN This year, the Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul implemented tiered systems for local speed limits; 25 mph for major streets (mixed-use, commercial and downtown streets) and 20 mph for minor streets (industrial and residential streets). Both cities intend for these changes to make streets safer for all users and to support their Vision Zero goal of zero traffic deaths or severe injuries. St. Louis Park, MN The City of St. Louis Park is considering implementing a tied system for local speed limits similar to that of neighboring Minneapolis with a default speed limit of 20 mph. Local Traffic/Crash Analysis Staff reviewed local traffic data collected between 2016 and 2019. This data was reviewed based on the roadway classifications identified in the Living Streets Plan; Minor Arterial, Collector, Local Connector or Local road (see Table 1). Roadway Classification Average Daily Traffic, vpd Data Points 85th Percentile Speed Range, mph Average 85th Percentile Speed, mph Minor Arterial 4,500 – 15,000 5 36.5 – 41.9 39.5 Collector 1,200 – 10,300 56 21.6 – 39.0 32.7 Local Connector 250 – 3,000 46 23.5 – 35.2 30.0 Local 30 – 1,200 64 17.9 - 32.5 25.4 Table 1: Local Traffic Analysis, 2016-2019 Relevant findings from this analysis include: 1. 85th percentile speeds tend to decrease as roadway classification and traffic volumes decrease. 2. The majority of drivers on Local and Local Connector roads obey the posted speed limit (most of these roads are currently 30 mph). 3. Wider roads (Minor Arterials and Collectors) tend to have higher speeds than narrower roads (Local Connectors and Locals). 4. Highway frontage roads tend to have the highest recorded speeds (8 of the 10 highest observed 85th percentile speeds were on frontage roads adjacent to Highways 100, 169 and 494. Crash data from the Minnesota Department of Public Safety was used to review local traffic accidents. This analysis included reported accidents on County, Municipal State Aid and local roads in Edina over a 5-year period between 2015 and 2019. Relevant findings from this analysis include: 1. Accidents were generally concentrated at intersections and along high-volume roads. 2. More than 50% of accidents on Municipal State Aid or local roads occurred at intersections. 3. Nearly all (96%) of accidents on Municipal State Aid or local roads occurred under a posted speed limit of 30 mph. 4. Only one fatal crash was reported over this time period; a pedestrian was struck and killed on France Avenue in 2016. 5. Proportionately, the severity of accidents was similar regardless of roadway type, with the majority resulting merely in property damage (see Table 2). Crash Severity Local Roads Municipal State Aid Roads County Roads Property Damage 70.9% 67.9% 67.4% Possible Injury 17.3% 16.9% 16.7% Minor Injury 9.8% 13.6% 13.4% Serious Injury 1.7% 1.4% 1.8% Fatality - - 0.2% Unknown 0.3% 0.2% 0.5% Table 2. Local Crash Analysis, 2015-2019 6. Most accidents had no clear contributing action reported. Regardless of roadway type, distracted driving, failing to yield the right-of-way, and running red lights were generally reported more frequently than speeding. 7. Accidents involving pedestrians or cyclists were relatively rare (less than 10%) and generally occurred along County or Municipal State Aid roads. The greatest concentration of these is in the southeast quadrant of Edina, primarily along France Avenue and York Avenue. 8. Accidents involving a pedestrian or cyclist were more than three times as likely to result in a minor or serious injury compared to overall crashes. BLAKE RDSCHAEFER RDVERNON AVEFRANCE AVE SXERXES AVE SCAHILL RD70TH ST W 66TH ST W YORK AVE SINTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 4 4 T H S T W 50TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST W GLEASON RD70TH ST W 76TH ST W DEWEY HILL RD VALLEY VIEW RD VALLEY VIEW RD MINNESOTA DR78TH ST W HWY 100HWY 169HWY 169HWY 100HWY 62 HWY 62 City of EdinaProposed Speed Limits Other Jurisdiction 15 mph (School Zone) 30 mph 25 mph 20 mph 20 mph (School Zone) / Engineering DeptOctober 2020 Feedback Form Submissions This is a ridiculous proposal. I would require that anyone on the council actually try driving within Edina at the proposed 20 mph limit. I’m not sure this proposal addresses the actual problem. If speed limits aren’t enforced on city streets, what does it matter if the posted speed limit is 25 or 30? I would like to know how you are going to police this change? I don't see much of ANY police presence on our residential streets. What difference does the speed limit matter if no one is there enforcing it? Seems like it will be money wasted on new speed limit signs that will still be ignored my most people driving down the residential streets with zero enforcement. SPeed limit of 30 mph is fine. I see no need to change it. I am not in favor of changing almost every street in Edina to a 25 mile an hour limit. People always think everyone drives too fast no matter where you are, and on main thoroughfares it's ridiculous to have them that slow. No, no, no!!! The City of Edina should have 30+ mph speed limits on all streets that are not directly adjacent to schools. We are a town of people on the go, doing things and making things happen. We need to get to where we are going in a reasonable amount of time, otherwise people speed. Speeding tickets are a way for this "progressive" city to raise revenue. It is wrong to fine people for driving at a reasonable speed, which is 30 mph in the city. The City is hell-bent on packing people into this city via high rises, urbanizing our collective environment and generating more tax revenue for the City to feed off of. The City needs to get real with the associated costs of volumes of people - these people travel the streets in their cars and need to get to where they are going in an efficient manner. Lowering the speed limits across the city just raises the blood pressure of travellers and causes road rage. Children need to be taught to stay out of the streets and bikers need to obey traffic laws - all of which will reduce the chance of a hazardous encounter between cars and non-cars on the roadways, if that is your stated goal. The burden of safety needs to be shared between car drivers and non-car drivers, and not weighed more heavily toward car drivers. 30 mph on city streets is a standard speed limit across the United States. It is a reasonable city speed limit and should remain for the City of Edina!!! I propose NO speed limit changes to reduce car travel speeds in the City of Edina. I favor retaining current limits. Different limits cause confusion for drivers and require thousands of ugly signs No changes are necessary... It is extremely hard to keep your car, truck, school busses at such a low speed, especially if you are trying to go up a hill, going down hill all you do is ride your brakes. I am more concerned with bikers the don’t follow biking rules. They are more a problem. Too many streets at 25mph This should be for neighborhoods only not connectors. Would love for more residential streets to be 25 mph instead of 30 I very much welcome a change of speed limit- Especially on West Shore Dr. There are many speeders on this road with NO SIDEWALKS. I am concerned to have my 3 children walk or ride bike on our road. I hope this passes. I would also like to petition for consideration of a stop sign at West Shore Dr and Dunham Dr. My husband's parked car was hit on West Shore Dr with such force that it was totaled. If there was a stop sign I believe this hopefully wouldn't have happened. I also worry about the hidden sidewalk that comes out from Aspasia Lane onto West Shore Dr. There have been too many close calls with kids on bikes and cars driving too fast down West Shore Dr. Thank you for your time and consideration. I support the lower local speed limits proposal as presented in the interactive map. I'm good with 25 mph on largely residential areas, but I think there are a few exceptions where 25 is a bit excessive. For example: 25mph on Cahill between 70th and 78th. I think thru streets at 25 mph unnecessarily slow. On 70th between France and 100 I frequently get tailgated for driving the speed limit. Hello My Name is Joe Burke and we are long time residents. I appreciate slower speed limits in our neighborhood and have previously, and unsuccessfully brought this up before o I am glad it is resurfacing. I also think that in addition to slower speeds, the city should add two 4 way stops on Mirror Lakes Drive. One at Ayrshire and 1 at Northwoods. There are a ton of young kids in this neighborhood so let's keep speeds down. Thank you, Joe Go for it!!!! Yes! Lower the speed limit. But before you bother with that, enforce the law that tells people to stop at stop signs. So many people run stop signs and never get a ticket. I live just off 78th Street. I walk along 78th Street often and I bike in the area as well. I'm trying to understand why the speed limit is proposed to be 30 instead of 35. If we are unable to reduce the speed limit on 50th Street, we should at least consider reducing the lanes down to one lane going in each direction, with adequate accommodations for the safety of pedestrians and cyclists. I am 100% in favor of lowering the speed limit to 25 MPH. We have a lot of walkers and children in our neighborhood and cars drive too fast on Chantrey as they are cutting thru from Vernon Ave. to Interlachen Blvd. My family lives in a residential area and we routinely see drivers speeding down the roads in our neighborhood. In particular, I have witnessed and have read many Nextdoor reports of young people trying to “lay rubber” on our roads and speeding. I am surprised that, as far as I’m aware, there has not yet been a serious accident. Families and children are routinely walking and biking our neighborhood. I have myself experimented with driving at 30 and at 25 here, and as a result, chosen to stick with a 25 mph limit. At that speed, I can more clearly see what’s going on around and ahead of me and have been grateful to have avoided more than one potential accident. I fully support and endorse the city’s plan to change our speed limits as laid out in the plan, and thank you for finally getting to this overdue change. I live at 5829 Creek Valley Road. Our street in a hill. While driving 25mph at the top of the hill may be ok, people speed up with the momentum of the hill and by the time they reach my house at the curve 25mph is way to fast to safely make the turn. I would suggest 20mph. We are also considering speed bumps. We appreciate Chad’s prior efforts. I do not think the overturned past proposal would have helped the speed issue on our once quiet and now busy (because of field drop offs) street. I live on Barrie Road, a curving street with heavy traffic, no continuous sidewalks and cars in many places parked on both sides of the street. I often see seniors using walkers and single parents with two children or a stroller walking in the street. At night, the lighting is inadequate and I often are surprised to see a pedestrian in the street right after I turn onto Barrie off of 66th. With higher speeds, more auto and pedestrian accidents happen with more severe injuries and property damage. If the lower limit saves the life of one child, and it will, it is justified. Additionally, when the city streets are covered on snow, drivers should be encouraged or required to drive no faster than 20 mph. Additionally, a limit of 20 mph should be placed on any streets where construction eliminate traffic lanes, or blocked sidewalks force people to walk in the street. In this situation, the city should install temporary speed limit signs in the construction zone. Frankly, I have often seen no warning of construction zones, and just as on highway in construction, speed limits should be lowered. Of course, for city streets with traffic lights the timing needs to be adjusted for new speed limits. For example if one drives the speed limit on France, you can literally be stopped at every light, a very frustrating thing. Once any new law is in place, it make sense to have the police out, but also put up additional lights that tell you your speed. In a two way single lane road, one person driving the limit can effectively calm traffic. Those who currently exceed a higher speed limit are really not going to like this. In terms of education, it is important to communicate how little time is added to trips within Edina with a speed limit reduction of only 5 miles per hour. Yes lower the speed limits to 25 mph I do nor feel that the speed limits should be lowered, NOR do I feel that the City will have enough resources to properly enforce these limits. I live on west shore drive and people regularly drive over 40 mph down the street. On a speed study a few years ago one driver was found driving over 60 mph! Earlier this summer I watched an adult biker nearly get hit by a car in our road as the driver refused to slow down and veered around a child and then almost hit the adult. Children are always playing and biking in our neighborhood and they need to be safe. I definitely support lower speed limits on roads Edina has control over. The more the better. I'm not in favor, and encourage against the change. I think a lower speed limit would be great. And more PSA about road safety,making full stops, & pedestrian in crosswalks, etc. We frequently are almost run over in crosswalks or walking across street at corners, because a car may stop for us,but they then rush through before our 5 year old & us are at other side. I've been clipped a few times & our child almost run over because she stopped to pick up her mitten in middle of road. Drivers in Edina are entitled, rude & violate laws majority of the time. We feel safer living in London or Madrid. Also, in overseas the speed limit is only 15MPH in city & residential zones. So, yes please reduce the speed limit & enforce it. Thank you! I strongly support the speed limit proposal throughout the City. The pandemic has brought many more people out walking, including elderly people and families with children. This is a great thing and I hope it continues! Large areas of Edina still have no sidewalks. Reducing the speed limit will make Edina a safer, healthier city. When residents complain about speeding are they concerned about speeds in excess of 30 MPH or do they think people traveling at the posted speed limits are going too fast? If it's the former, it seems like the solution is enforcement. If the latter, then perhaps lowering the limits is the right intervention. It's an excellent idea to lower the speed limits; however, enforcement will be a challenge. So many drivers disregard the existing limits anyway. 70th street is currently 25MPH from 100 to France, with a school zone. It is brutal driving on a main street at 25MPH. Cahill Road and Dewey Hill Road are generally a 40MPH effective speed today. I understand overall safety, but what problem is Edina trying to solve? Main streets don't have children playing in them today, and truly residential streets don't have that much traffic. Are there any statistics for how many people are hit today because of a 30MPH speed limit? The only time I get tailgated and honked at on 70th are by residents. The same people that petitioned to make it a 25MPH street. Have you considered any impact on miles-per-gallon? It seems to me when I am driving in stop and go and slower situations, my car gets worse mpg than when I am at 30 mph. If this is true, it could have an impact on air quality/climate change issues. But I have no idea what the science says about it. I am very happy the city is planning to make this change. How will it be enforced? I am totally against lowering speed limits on Edina's city streets. First you cut the number of lanes on important streets and now you want to lower the speeds. NO! It is getting harder and harder to navigate Edina by car with all the new traffic due to the wave of new hi-density apartment buildings. Why don't you start enforcing the existing traffic laws on bicyclists who glide right through stop signs and routinely take other serious risks on streets? And what about traffic noise? The crowd that likes to let everyone know of their presence with those special non-mufflers, and the motorcyclists that ignore noise ordinances need to be reminded that people live within 30-50 ft. of city streets. Hwy. 100 sounds like the Indianapolis Speedway with all of the noise violations. NO to lowering the speed limits. Focus on facilitating the movement of traffic through the city, not causing congestion. Very happy with the proposed reductions in speed limits. We live on Wooddale and would love to see the limit reduced to 25 mph. I am strongly in favor of the new proposal to decrease local speed limits!! Thank you for considering this serious concern, and for asking for input. In reviewing the speed limits, they are quite reasonable. Unfortunately, people drive much faster. To achieve the end result of slower driving please consider speed bumps, stop signs, whatever the experts recommend as ways to increase effectiveness of speed limits. Please address the problems in Brookview Heights Please do something about compliance in ENTIRE neighborhood. There are SO many speeders and SO many little kids running around the entire neighborhood, honest to goodness, we daily witness the horrifying posssibilities. Abercrombie/Ridgeview from 66th to 70th is an especially treacherous stretch of road. Several speed bumps? Stop signs? Stop signs are needed at Tifton/Rabun, blind intersection /hill, and another at the intersection of Tifton/Everett, where it is difficult to see who is coming and people are flying through without even looking. THANK YOU! Rita Younger I am behind the proposal as presented & would like 25 mph designation. Today 30mph seems to mean 35-40 for many. Maybe 25 mph will bring some reality to 30 mph! Safety and quality of life are important to me as an Edina resident. Thanks! I agree with the proposed local speed limits. If drivers would adhere to 30 mph and USE CAUTION, I would be happy with 30 mph. However there are too many drivers who speed on city streets. I like to walk and bike. In order to get to a sidewalk or bike trail I have to use the city streets. I endorse the proposed speed limits! My wife and I both think this is a great idea. I use a wheelchair and she uses a walker. Anything the city can do to get cars to slow down and make it safer for us pedestrians is a welcome thing. reduced speed limit in residential neighborhoods is long overdue. Are bicyclists considered pedestrianism Edina? How many of the 50% increase in pedestrian deaths are bicyclists? Please change all "side streets' to 20 mph. "20 is plenty" should be our watchword. I walk my dogs alot in our Countryside neighborhood, and on those streets without sidewalks, it can be unnerving to have cars zoom past us. The wind shear from speeding cars pushes our 6 month old golden retriever into my legs when we are walking on Olinger Blvd to get into Bredesen Park from Jeff Place. Maybe people think Olinger Blvd is 40 mph like Vernon Ave? I think lowered speed limits and then enforcing those speed limits makes for a safer community for our children and pedestrians. Will speed bumps be used? I know other traffic calming measures such as narrow streets have been used as well. Busier through streets should still be 30mph but residential streets I support being lower. I wholeheartedly agree with these proposed changes. I live on Wooddale Avenue. I am very concerned with the high speeds drivers are operating on my street and surrounding neighborhood streets. I have never understood why the limit on Wooddale South of 70th is 30 MPH and 25 MPH on 70! Due to walking/busing limits set by the district, my kids do not receive a bus and walk to school. They have to cross/walk on Wooddale where people drive way too fast in my opinion. There are many kids in our neighborhood in this situation. No sidewalk and fast cars! I’m very happy to see a decrease in speed limits, however would like to 20 mph on all residential streets. We walk dogs daily and observe many people surpass the speed limits regularly. Lowering them may help getting closer to a required speed.....also for those of us whose streets have no sidewalks and are required to walk in the street, a lower speed would protect us better. Yes!! Please please lower the speed limits for the sake of our kids! People drive much too fast on residential streets and unlike Minneapolis, much of Edina does not have sidewalks. People are regularly walking in the street. I think some neighborhoods need a 25 miles per hour, but some main streets should stay 30 or 40. The issue is a few chronic violators in the neighborhoods... maybe the police can act on calls complaints about a specific person?? By not taking a more nuanced approach to lowering speed limits to 20 in residential areas and 25 on streets with lane markings, the city is giving up one of its most useful tools in controlling traffic flow. The city needs to take an approach that limits speeds to 20 mph on residential roads and makes use of some 25mph roads to direct traffic. For example, the city needs to use every tool they have to direct traffic down streets like 44th which are wider and have houses set back from the road and away from streets like Sunnyside which have numerous crosswalks. Even at 25 mph, it is simply not possible for cars to observe and safely stop for pedestrians. At the Town Talks meeting, 2 reasons were given for not following the tiered approach of Minneapolis. (1) The Edina police might get confused about what the speed limit is and be unable to enforce it. This logic is an insult to the Edina police! (2) The second reason given was cost savings. This reason is also unfounded, Every road does not need a speed limit. Follow the standards set by nearly every city and set a default speed of 20 unless posted and then post signs only on streets that have higher speed limits. Furthermore, the reduction in road maintenance from the 20 (compared to 25mph) would be sufficient to cover the slight cost increase of signs if there are any. Finally, some residents might complain that lowering speed limits to 20 mph might increase traffic or slow commutes. This is also unfounded. Many traffic jams are caused by the "traffic wave" due to cars slowing and accelerating. By lowering speed limits, cars drivers can more easily adjust to disturbances without jamming on their breaks propagating the slow down behind them. Furthermore, even if commutes are slowed slightly, drivers spend only a few minutes on residential roads, so by adopting a tiered approach, the impact can be minimized. Thank you for taking the time to read my comments, M. Barach The residential streets should have a maximum speed limit of 20 mph. Traffic usually tests the speed limit so in actuality drivers tend to drive 5 mph over the speed limit. Minneapolis instituted a 20 mph speed limit several months ago and their residents love this. I also request that traffic laws are enforced and tickets be given for drivers who roll through stop signs. Please! and thanks. Yes, all city streets should be reduced as proposed, signed with speed limits and enforced. All on-street bike routes should be clearly marked with bike symbols in pavement, such as 44th & properly maintained as such. I am in favor of lowering the speed limit. Do not lower the limit on streets to 25. This is confusing and contradictory to other cities. I support 25, but why not 20? I live on Valley View between 62/100 and it is currently 30 and we have people going 40+ regularly. If we set at 20, 40 becomes 30. The EPD would rather patrol 100 for speeders than the city streets. Please leave speed limit at 30mph. Add button activated flashing lights at school crossings. I really like the idea of lowering the speed limit on neighborhood streets. We get a fair amount of traffic through the Country Club neighborhood and with so many kids and adults out walking and biking, I think the lower speeds would be helpful. There is also a lot of foot, bike and car traffic around 50th & France, so to lower the speed there also makes a lot of sense to me. It is a great idea to lower speed limits in Edina. I have small children and am always fearful of how fast people race on Blake rd s, between Vernon and Interlachen. Any speed decrease would be greatly appreciated and supported. We agree with the newly proposed speed limits, which favor 25mph instead of 30mph There are already lower speed limits by schools where it matters. I’m a biker so I do want to be safe biking, but lowering the speed limits makes no sense especially since police shouldn’t waste their time enforcing that when there are more critical issues. It is also a waste of money to our up new signs when it could be spent on other more critical needs. So, please do not change the speed limits. I think in general the 25 mph speed limits on most streets are a great idea. On Interlachen specifically I think 30 mph is appropriate, but it should be enforced. People routinely fly down it way over the speed limit, blowing through marked crosswalks carelessly when I’m waiting to cross. I’m not sure what will solve that problem, but it definitely is scary to think of kids crossing alone given people’s driving behavior. I support a reduced speed limit on residential streets Based on a comparison between the current and proposed speed limits, it appears that the change would be largely an across-the-board reduction in the speed limits to 25 mph with few exceptions around schools and a small number of other streets. This change is inconsistent with the stated goals to balance local and regional traffic and based on traffic volume. I support greater differentiation in speed limits between neighborhood streets that primarily serve just residents along that street vs. the arteries feeding into and out of neighborhoods. For instance, I think that it would make sense to have slightly higher speed limit on 'through' streets like 70th, 66th, Woodale, Willson, Dewey Hill, Blake, etc. compared to the lower-traffic side streets in these neighborhoods. This will help maintain better traffic flow on already busy streets while helping to discourage cut-through traffic into neighborhoods. I would advocate, for instance, for more neighborhood streets to have a 20 mph speed limits while the through streets maintain higher speed limits of 25 mph or 30 mph. I also feel that a discussion about speed limits should also include discussion about opportunities to promote adherence with the speed limits through either increased enforcement of speed limits or passive calming measures like speed humps at the entrances to neighborhood streets. Most changes are 5 mph decrease, seems we would spend more money to change road signs then it would make a difference What would be the cost to change all the signs to reduce the speed by 5mph? I do understand that Edina uses speeding fines as a major income stream and am wondering if this is the real motivation. I do not believe this would cut down on accidents. I live on Golf Terrace. The street is wide enough that people fly down it! This is especially during the morning and evening commute and before and after high school. I year or so ago, I believe you did a traffic study with the sensor that lays on the road. Interestingly-people slowed down to go over that sensor! I very much think speed limits decreasing to 25 would be an improvement. I would suggest that a speed bump or additional stop sign on Golf Terrace would be an improvement. Of course, speed enforcement would be awesome! We have so many young children on the street, I feel it is only a matter of time until something sad and bad happens. I appreciate the recommendation to lower speed limits on most Edina streets to 25 MPH. I would like to see the city follow the lead of some other cities like St Paul and Minneapolis in reducing the speed limits on residential roads to 20 MPH. The proposed 5 MPH reduction (from 30 to 25) seems too small to actually affect driver behavior to slow drivers, whereas a 10 MPH reduction (from 30 to 20) would send a clear signal to all drivers that the city is committed to improving safety on our streets. 20 MPH should be plenty fast when driving on most of our residential streets, with a higher (25 or 30 MPH) limit on some of the larger through roads. It is quite appropriate to reduce the standard speed limit to 25mph. Many neighborhood streets should be even lower, in my opinion. It looks like both of our neighboring cities, Minneapolis and St. Louis Park will be implementing 20 mph speed limits on residential streets. I feel Edina should match these speed limits and make 20 mph the speed limit on residential streets. Making a change from 30 to 25 mph won't affect our quality of life and safety for the increased amount of walkers and bikers we have. Please consider 20 mph on residential streets. Thank you, Scott Busyn 4615 Wooddale Avenue Reducing speed limits on Edina streets would create a safer environment for residents of all ages to get around outdoors. The difference in pedestrian and personal safety between 30-35 miles/hr and 20-25 miles/hr is significant. I would strongly support making this change wherever possible in the city. Interlachen Blvd. should also be lowered to 25. I agree the speed limits on residential streets like Gilford Dr should decrease. A neighbor’s dog was just hit by a car yesterday evening. Alarming, and fortunate that it wasn’t a child. We have many young kids in the neighborhood. Generally fast traffic through my neighborhood, south cornelia 70th St. Is our north property boundary. About 15 years ago, 70th was redeveloped with the purpose of slowing down traffic and maintaining a neighborhood feel. Many fine improvements were made including lowering the speed to 25 MPH. Hardly anyone drives 25. Cars accelerate coming off the traffic circle to our east and the east bound traffic races towards France Avenue. Other than setting up regular police patrols, I am not sure what can be done as rarely is the 25 MPH limit honored. Thanks for listening. Mark Mitchell. 7001 Heatherton Trail The current speed limit is fine with me. Changing the limit still requires the same enforcement as the current one. I would like to see more enforcement of the hands-free law which many are not obeying. And and overhaul of the traffic control system which nearby cities have made, such as flashing yellow for left turns, and better sensors for signal changes when traffic is light. I can drive to Eden Prairie from highway 100 and W 70th Street faster than getting through Edina to Richfield. I am not at all in favor of changing existing speed limits. I am in favor of doing a better job of enforcing existing speed limits. I don't worry about cars traveling 30 mph on my streets. It's the cars going well over 30 mph that are a concern. In 30-plus years, I have NEVER seen speed enforcement on my street or any other streets in my neighborhood. Edina does speed enforcement on busy streets where they can make the most money. Lowering the current speed limit will not improve speeding in neighborhoods. Speeders will speed. Leave current speed limit alone. As a family of 2 adults, 2 children years 11 and 8, and a puppy, we fully support a speed limit of 25 mph on the side streets and generally reducing the speed limit on all Edina streets. We walk, run or bike every day in our Lake Cornelia neighborhood and there are no sidewalks here. We have had several close calls with drivers zipping past us going too fast. While lowering the speed limit provides greater safety for all (drivers & passengers, pedestrians and bicyclists), I doubt it will make much difference without enforcement. We have been asking for enforcement of the 30 mph speed limit on Olinger Blvd for many years with almost no action. On this residential street where young children live, rarely does anyone observe the limit. Not only do most cars drive closer to 40 mph, we have seen cars racing down the street and cars being passed when going the speed limit. Not only are the speeding cars a danger to the neighborhood children and the numerous pedestrians and bicyclists that use this street, but the cars trying to leave their driveways, especially those near where the street curves. I would like to know exactly how many accidents have occurred on these Edina City streets that may have been prevented with a slower speed limit. Also, how many speeding tickets have been issued? If it hasn't been a problem here, I don't think we need to spend tax money on making a change. No need to change the speed limit. 30 is slow enough and very safe. You can twist the data to meet whatever agenda your trying to accomplish. This does not make any sense cost-wise or safety-wise. Complete waste of time for the council to review. Thank you for requesting feedback from Edina residents regarding proposed speed limits. I am in favor of lowing neighborhood speed limits to 25 mph. For the ultimate safety, it is imperative that drivers slow down and be on the alert for pedestrians entering crosswalks. Too often I witness drivers barreling down our two-block street, exceeding the posted 30 mph by 5-10 mph. We have so many small children that dart out into the street while playing their games. It's terrifying to see cars, trucks and motorcyclists racing down the street -- with so many kids around. My preference would actually be to lower the speed limit to 20 mph. I like the signs that I have seen recently "20 is Plenty". It would be great if Edina lowered the speed limit to 20 mph in "high kid density" neighborhoods. I realize that would be difficult to identify neighborhoods with that distinctive characteristic --but it would be outstanding! I agree that the default speed limit should be 25 mph in Edina, except as noted om the map for other higher and lower speed limits. I think the proposed school zone speed limits should apply only on school days and during school hours and that the speed limit in school zones should be 25 mph at all other times. Here is an article from a bicycling magazine from England that sets out the reasons for lower speed limits in urban very well. Road speed reduction in Cambridge (England) From Newsletter 59 (April/May 2005) Speed kills. 90% of pedestrians hit by a vehicle at 40mph die, 20% at 30mph and only 2.5% at 20mph (figures from Which? Magazine, March 2005, p. 20). For cyclists hit by vehicles, the differential effect of vehicle speed is likely to be similarly significant. What do we know about speeding in the UK? In what follows, I draw on data assembled by Claire Corbett in chapter six of her impressive and scholarly book Car Crime (Willan, 2003). It is well established that speed is a main contributory factor in around a third of fatal road traffic crashes. In the year 2000 in England and Wales, around 1,100 avoidable deaths and more than 100,000 casualties resulted from exceeding limits and inappropriate speed. Government figures compiled from a wide range of sites show that on urban roads with a 40mph limit the average speed was 37mph with 25% of motorists exceeding 40mph. Where the speed limit was 30mph, the average speed was 32mph with 66% exceeding 30mph. 38% of buses exceeded the 30mph limit. Higher speeds are associated with both more serious collisions and with more frequent collisions. Reducing average speeds by just 1mph cuts average collision frequency by around 5%- more on slower, urban roads. There is nothing unexpected about the fact that speeding is dangerous. What is, for me, unexpected is that such small reductions in average speeds bring about such disproportionate benefits. https://www.camcycle.org.uk/newsletters/59/article8.html We are so happy to hear about the plan to lower the speed limits. Cars drive way to fast on our neighborhood streets that do not have sidewalks. It is especially important now, during the pandemic, to reduce the speed limit because so many people are out on walks and bike rides in the neighborhood. Drivers are going below 20 miles per hour when passing walkers. Being a senior who walks, I count on drivers taking extra caution since I am not always steady on my feet, and need more time to step up on a curb. When I must drive, I am super vigilant. Even before the pandemic, I drive 20 -25 mph on neighborhood streets. Lowering the speed limit is an excellent idea, making the streets safer for everyone. Thank you! Please leave the speed limits at 30. Two comments: How much will this change cost? I’m also concerned this is another attempt to increase city revenue through speeding tickets. Edina all ready leads the state in speeding tickets. Everyone I know says watch out driving in Edina, they will give you a ticket for Driving 3 mph over the limit Please review the speed on OLINGER BLVD. People fly down this road especially in am to school or work and again in the afternoon. Having current posted speeds ENFORCED would go a long way. If the City reduces the speed limit what does it matter if not enforced? Instead of speed traps up and down 100 and 62 use the City resources to enforce the local streets speeds. I live on Dakota Trail. We have over the years observed many cars speeding. It is a winding street without sidewalks. Both my husband and I are strongly in favor of lowering the city street speed limit. Wait for the technical report by LRRB. If you decide not to wait for LRRB, keep all collectors at 30. 25 should only be on local roads, not collectors. Enforce the existing limits. The problem isn’t the limit the problem is folks who don’t care. I favor the lower speed limits for the streets in the Parkwood Knolls neighborhood. Many of these streets do not have sidewalks (including in front of my home). With the increased emphasis on outdoor activity, walkers regularly encounter vehicle traffic moving at speeds that are of concern. I am in favor of reducing speed limits in Edina. More people are cutting through parts of the city (via streets like Vernon) and are going way faster than the marked speed limits. Additionally, cars travel through neighborhood streets so quickly that it can feel unsafe to walk—especially with children. I feel it is a problem that many of my neighbors need to put “slow down for children” or “drive as if your children live here” signs in their lawns. Our neighborhoods should feel safe and those signs should not be necessary. I live on Park Terrace in Parkwood Knolls. As like most of Edina, we have almost no sidewalks here while we also have a significant number of vehicles parked on the street. We also continue to have new and replacement home building, home remodeling and landscaping projects that often make walking in the streets difficult. I believe a 20 MPH speed limit will make the neighborhood both safer and more inviting for walkers and families with small children. I am in support of this proposal and am happy to see this action being taken to lower the residential street speed limits. I think changing the speed limit for local streets to 25 mph makes a lot of sense for safety reasons! As specified in the reasoning for speed limit changes: "the primary motivation is to improve safety for all road users. The difference between 30 and 25 miles per hour may not seem like much to a driver, but it can mean a lot to a pedestrian or cyclist" This reasoning, I am in total agreement. However, as I look at current and proposed speeds, there are issues that need to be considered. For instance, the "current speed" on Gleason Road north from VV road is shown as 20mph, there is a rare vehicle travelling at that speed on that portion of Gleason Road. North of 62, this speed changes to 30 mph currently. Again, it is a rare vehicle that limits its speed to 30mph, but, instead exceeds even 40mph in this area. Gleason Road, south of VV road to W78th street is actually ALREADY POSTED at 25mph. Obviously, this speed limit is considered to be just a suggestion and again, it is a rare driver that follows the speed limits. This area of Gleason Rd. has a long downhill portion, many curves and often, limited visibility. Many vehicles can be observed careening around the curves and unable to maintain control within their traffic lane. This is especially dangerous when affected by weather conditions. This area is highly used by pedestrians, runners and cyclists. The stop signs in this area are well known to be blown through without stopping, or with the well known "Edina tap and go" Another issue in Edina is that the speed limit signage is very limited, and unfortunately, unless noticed, the driver is not going to be reminded of the actual legal speed. For instance, the speed limit signage on Gleason Road appears maybe once for each section. And, as the trees mature, this signage is often obstructed. With limited availability of speed limit signage and limited enforcement, driver speed becomes arbitrary and a decision based on driver preference. Another area of issue is with the traffic circles which are posted prior to the entrance to the traffic circle, with no reminder at any other distance. The 15mph speed limit is so rarely observed, one wonders why the speed is posted at all. Again - without enforcement, lawlessness is encouraged. Unfortunately, habits are hard to break. Speed law enforcement will be necessary to change the current habits. I have often observed city trucks and police vehicles travelling in excess of posted speeds which are a bit of an invitation to Edina residents that speed limits don't really matter that much in Edina. This is unfortunate. I doubt that just changing speed signage will provide much change at all. I strongly feel the changing of speed limits is not going to make a difference in Edina unless the speed limits are actually enforced. I have been honked at on Gleason road by a driver who wanted to exceed the speed limit- and I have been passed in a no passing zone on Interlachen Blvd when driving the speed limit. The problem isn't with the speed posted on our streets, it is with the lawlessness that is rampant, not only in Edina, but throughout MN and the nation as a whole. I agree with lowering speed limits. Thank you for your efforts to lower residential speed limits in Edina. It is an important step to increase the safety of our streets. I would recommend that individual neighborhoods are allowed to apply for special consideration by the Traffic Commission. Not all residential streets in Edina have the same circumstances. Research has shown that neighbors tend to drive near the speed limit when driving in their own neighborhood. For neighborhoods with with mostly resident traffic, a 25 mph speed limit will likely be perfectly acceptable. For neighborhoods, like Country Club, where over 50% of the traffic is non-resident, then speeds are a challenge. The police chief has stated that they cannot fill the courts with traffic tickets less than 7 mph over the speed limit. This means that a 25 mph speed limit will not be enforced until over 32 mph. This means that not all city neighborhoods will benefit from the safety advantages of a 25 mph speed limit equally--mostly-resident-traffic neighborhoods will likely see adherence to 25 mph, and cut-through neighborhoods will continue to see speeds above 30 mph without any enforcement. It would be most appropriate if the Traffic Commission would consider specific neighborhood applications before the investment into signage across the community. On the subject of signage, it would be ideal if the smallest allowable signage was utilized. While it's important for drivers to be able to discern the speed limit. All this signage does congest the residential environment, especially in neighborhoods with traffic diverters that require a lot of signage. Thank you for your consideration. I support the lower limit. There is a lot of cut through and speeding in the Country Club I support lowering speed limits to 25 on neighborhood streets. I am strongly in favor. A few mph slower gives a longer reaction time for avoiding pedestrians, bikes, people backing out of driveways, etc. Speeding in our neighborhood is a problem especially because of street parking and minimal visibility to see children crossing the street or proceeding onto street from driveways or sidewalks. We have a big problem in the Country Club neighborhood of drivers from Linden Hills using our neighborhood to cut through to get to and from the 100 freeway. Many of them speed. We also have a problem with teenagers living in our neighborhood driving recklessly fast, particularly on Bridge Ave that bisects the whole neighborhood. To me 25 mph is more than fast enough and I am strongly in favor of making this our speed limit. Thank you for your consideration. Definitely lower the speed limit in Country Club. People in general drive way too fast. Country Club neighborhood should have a speed limit of 20 mph. I always thought it was 25. When I taught my boys to drive, I stressed importance of how important it is to keep speed at or below 20 mph, that 25 was too fast because of kids playing, pedestrians and other cars. The diagram I recently saw states that speed limit is 30 actually which absolutely shocks me if accurate. Way way too fast. I am speaking of my neighborhood because I know it well. I imagine all residential streets would also need to be kept to at least 25 mph or less. Thank you for recommending lower speed limits in Edina. I heartily support this recommendation. I vote for a speed limit of 25 mph or lower 20 is plenty. Its a no brainer. I fully support reducing the speed limit to 25 in the Country Club neighborhood. We live on Browndale and cars routinely speed and run stop signs as they cut through from 44th to 50th Street. Construction vehicles working on the street are also a major issue with speeding and running stop signs. We live on Arden and have many Little ones I worry about. Non residents and residents use our street to avoid 50th and France traffic if going north on France/LindenHills etc. The of speeds cars and construction trucks is shocking to me. Before the pandemic I would have been at work and would not have noticed this issue. But it is terrible. I think this is a FABULOUS idea. I am totally in favor of reducing speed limits in neighborhoods. I would like the speed limit to go even lower -- 20 mph in residential areas. I am strongly in favor of changing the speed limit to 25 MPH. 30 MPH is way too fast, especially for the Country Club neighborhood. I vote 20 or 25 mph for Country Club neighborhood. I wish we as a neighborhood would have voted to put in speed bumps back when the sewer and water lines were replaced. Speeds on cut through streets are excessive and coasting through stop signs Yes, we've needed this. We are on Wooddale which is used as a thoroughfare thru the neighborhood. Though Wooddale is narrow, a fair portion of those commuting through the neighborhood exceed the current speed limit. So adjustment is quite appreciated. Dear City of Edina, Thank you so much for your recommendation to lower the speed limit in the historical Country Club district, as well as on many other streets in Edina, to 25 MPH. For the safety of our children, as well as for others crossing the street, I strongly support this action. Furthermore, I would ask that police increase enforcement activity related to these speed limits, as people today routinely exceed the current limits on our street (Edina Blvd.). We appreciate your diligence on this important matter, and thank you for your important work. Sincerely, A.R. Weiler 4512 Edina Blvd. Edina, MN 55424 Without enforcement, behavior will not change. You will spend money on signage and it will be wasted. Traffic is slowed by obstacles such as speed bumps or stop signs. My street was narrowed last year and it has done nothing for speed. In some ways it is worse because the street is narrower - speeding and less room to get out of the way. Pls reconsider. Perhaps look at specific streets. Streets are not all the same and there isn't one solution for all. This is Jeff and Virginia Sweitzer at 4514 Arden Ave So. As you know Arden is a narrow street with parking on one side only. As traffic volume has increased on Arden from 50th to Sunnyside over the past 5 to 6 years so have the speeds that morning and evening commuters are traveling on Arden Ave. As I'm sure you are aware Arden is a convenient way to skirt the traffic at the 50th and France area. We observe folks typically traveling in excess of the 30 mph limit, sometimes what appears to be in excess of 50 mph. Therefore we we would like to suggest a reduction to a posted limit of 20 mph knowing that maybe this will net some folks traveling at a lower speed thus reducing the speed of folks following the slower cars. We have inquired about speed bumps between the stop signs but have been told this interferes with the snow plowing, understood. Thank you for your review of the above in advance, Sincerely, Jeffery Sweitzer AIA CID Speed limits should remain the State default for unmarked roads. Understanding the road widths and the ability to park on both sides of the road, I would ask that the evaluation group consider a speed limit of 20 MPH for the Country Club neighborhood. With defined boundaries, establishing a separate speed limit, lower than the rest of the city, is feasible. From a cost perspective, there are no speed limit signs in Country Club (I've been looking) so adding a couple would be of minimal cost. Edina law enforcement would have a set boundary to enforce a lower speed limit which should make it easier for them. Thank you for relooking at speed limits. I think it is appropriate to have 30mph on the main streets (France, Wooddale), but my perspective is 20 is plenty fast for the neighborhood roads. Edina is a community with a ton of kids running & biking, and we should do all we can to keep them safe. I think the speed limit on neighborhood streets should stay at 30 mph unless there are facts that support lowering the speed limit (I.e., what problem are we trying to solve?) Is Edina just trying to be “progressive” or “cool” without facts to support decision-making? I appreciate that the City of Edina is visiting the issue of speed limits on roads under its jurisdiction. First, a correction to the existing speeds map: Parts of Hwy 100 are now 60 mph, including north of Crosstown. I live on the corner of W 49th St and France Ave S, on the Edina side of France Ave. The east side of France Ave is in Minneapolis. Mpls adopted a citywide 20 mph speed limit, unless otherwise posted. Across the street from me, 49th St in Mpls is signed for 20 mph. Along the France Ave border, almost all the Mpls streets are signed for 20mph. I would first like to discuss the matter of sidewalks in relation to our roads. I love France Ave, and cannot imagine why anyone one would choose to not have sidewalks on France Ave, as I told Edina’s then-City Engineer Fran Hoffman in advance of the 1990 France Ave Road Recon. France Ave moves a lot of traffic. 49th St has sidewalk in front of 3 doubles—that’s all. Effectively, 49th St is a “Woonerf”, as are most of the residential streets in Edina. 49th St is a shared space; that is a fact and a good concept. There are no sidewalks on Highway 100, and it is not a shared space, and I think that is good, too. Sidewalks change the character of a street. Some people see them as a positive. Some people see them as a negative, and that a certain quality of life is lost. There are various impacts. Sidewalks communicate and reinforce a negative concept, which is that roads are not a shared space, that roads are for vehicles and not for pedestrians and bicycles. Unarguably, pedestrians, for example, are safer when walking on sidewalks, rather than next to vehicles moving at high speeds. Yet, they are only safe to a point, because ultimately, people go out into the street for a number of reasons, and they need to feel safe, and should be able to be safe, when they are in the street. In other words, the safety afforded by sidewalks is limited. Sidewalks are an infrastructure, and are funded by increased taxes. In many locations where sidewalks have been installed, retaining walls are also installed. Both the new sidewalks and the new retaining walls will have to be periodically maintained with more taxation. Everything always looks so nice and promising when it is new, but just wait until it all becomes aging infrastructure. Ask Minneapolis. Sidewalks must be cleared of snow in the winter. This is a personal burden for residents, unless the City plows the sidewalks, separately from the streets, with more taxes. On some sidewalks, snow piles start to melt on winter days, causing runoff onto sidewalks, which freezes and becomes slippery ice when the temperature inevitably drops. Sometimes, there is freezing rain. Winter events like these can lead people to walk in the street to avoid slipping on icy sidewalks. One option, for the party responsible for the sidewalks, is to apply and re-apply salt throughout the season as needed. But that is another expense and an additional burden. Some facts: 1) sidewalks can be dangerous to walk on at times during the winter, even though shoveled or plowed, 2) sidewalks need salt at certain times to be safe to walk on, and 3) a system (personal or city) entirely separate from City road plows and salt trucks is required to clear sidewalks and keep them safe. There is hardly a road in Mpls that does not have sidewalks on both sides, and yet, sidewalks weren’t enough, and Mpls has now lowered speed limits citywide. In other words, to some extent, the expansive and expensive sidewalk (and related retaining wall) infrastructure is a failure. So, let’s not simply follow in Mpls’s footsteps. I often go out into the street. I am accustomed to traffic, both on France and on 49th. There are drivers who utilize 49th St as a faster alternative to Market St. Residents on 49th and on Maple can describe speed issues along the length. I would like to build on the 20 mph that Mpls has set for 49th St, east of France Ave, and make our side 20 mph, too. During my 40 years at this location, just along my stretch of 49th St (the length of my property), cars have struck my stair railings twice (once summer coming up from France, once winter heading down to France), vehicle ran into snowbank, vehicle ran into apartment driveway retaining wall, vehicle parked on street was struck, vehicle did a 180 coming down the hill to France Ave. The City of Edina is proposing a speed limit of 25 mph unless otherwise signed. If the Edina Police were requested to enforce an area, what is the margin of error in speed enforcement? 5 mph? If so, then the enforced speed is 30 mph. If that is the case, then what is the benefit of the change from citywide 30 mph to citywide 25 mph? What to do with Edina’s speed limits for this project? 1) The City of Edina did not post on Better Together the analytical data behind the proposed speed limit changes. I would like the opportunity to review these data prior to the City Council taking action on the speed limit matter. Could you post any of this data for the public? 2) Edina does not need to act in haste. Edina does not need to act on all streets at once. 3) Hold down our tax burden. 4) Take advantage of existing signage. If there is a speed limit already posted, just leave it at that speed for now. The City can always assess any element at a later date. Wooddale, 50th west of Wooddale, 66th, Valley View, the service road east of Hwy 100—these are a few examples of signed roads. 5) Take action on unsigned roads only. Make all unsigned roads 20 mph. I am guessing that most residents on most unsigned roads (no posted speed limit) would be happier if drivers do not exceed 20 mph. 49th St is not signed. To be clear, I am advocating for 20 mph on 49th St. 6) Assess exceptions. I can share a couple: a. A peculiar, one-block segment of Arden Ave. Very oddly, northbound Arden from 51st to 50th St is posted 30 mph (!), in spite of the fact that it is the kind of residential road that is typically not signed in Edina. For uniformity, remove the sign and allow it to be 20 mph, unless the residents are adamant that it remain 30. b. Exception: 50th St from Wooddale to France, which is unsigned but carries 30 mph from the signed portion of 50th St west of Wooddale. 50th St is an important road for vehicular traffic. It should be faster than the neighborhood internal roads. 25 mph seems reasonable only if the neighborhood interiors are 20 mph. East of France Ave, 50th St is signed for 30 mph. c. You are familiar with more Edina streets than I am. What other possible exceptions can you think of? 7) Get the word out, give it some time, receive feedback, make future adjustments. 8) Promote the shared-use concept! Celebrate as a positive the fact that most of Edina’s roads are Woonerfs. Reducing most of those roads to 20 mph should help. 9) Assess citizen reports of road segments that have a particularly dangerous aspect, e.g. blind spots. People want to be happy. They don’t want to feel like they are always “dodging the bullet”. In some locations, pedestrians can try to be safe when crossing a road, for example, but safety is not truly possible due to curves or hills causing blind spots. In these areas, assess how many seconds a person has to react to traffic, and drivers have to react to a pedestrian. For example, how many feet of roadway are visible in each direction. How many seconds of visibility does that translate to at various speeds? In these areas, limited length 10, 15, or 20 mph, “crosswalk ahead”, and/or blind spot road signs might be helpful, similar to the blind spot sign for the Country Club service access driveway on the northbound service road on the east side of Hwy 100. 10) Assess other alternatives. For example, in my area, reducing southbound France Ave from two lanes to one lane, simply by striping the roadway, has reduced some of the chaos and danger of vehicles jockeying for lane position, while still allowing vehicles to move quickly and efficiently at most times of the day, which is important because France Ave is such an important road for getting from here to there, for handling high volumes of traffic, for being an emergency route, and, as an emergency route, for being able to be plowed equally quickly and efficiently (e.g. no messy, obstructive curb bump-outs). In the past, it seemed like there was at least one crash every year at 49th and France. That is not the case now. As a matter of fact, both north and south of 50th, I have observed more instances of polite conduct by drivers, which is more effective in the context of fewer driving lanes, because there are fewer collaborators required for ensuring safe road crossings, and by that I am referring to crossings by both pedestrians and vehicles. I am well aware that France Ave is a County road and not under your jurisdiction, but wanted to mention this because there have been some improvements without obstructing traffic. 11) Maintain financial support for the Edina Police so that they can continue to address such issues as impaired driving and red light running. I can mention that in the past year, I have observed on different days, during the daytime, drivers of a very expensive car and a very expensive SUV run the red light at 50th & Halifax. Both 50th & Halifax have sidewalks. Red light runners are a threat to other drivers as well as to pedestrians. No one is safe when drivers run red lights. Equally dangerous, pedestrians should not step out into the street in front of a moving vehicle, as though the vehicle were not there, simply because they are at a crosswalk. I have witnessed that, too. These are exceptions to normal conduct, but they are a reality. 12) At what speeds are people actually driving? To assist in review and discussion, it might be helpful to publicly post online, the data gained from speed studies. In order to get more accurate results, the police department speed box should not be present while speeds are being assessed. 13) Keep apprised of future technologies on the horizon. Might some of today’s traffic concerns be reduced or eliminated with some future technological changes to vehicles? How do we address speed and traffic issues now, while being mindful that some issues might change in the future? 14) Keep in mind that the vast majority of vehicle trips each day result in no crashes. Thank you. I find it hard to believe that the speed limit on a busy road connected to a freeway (70th), has a lower speed limit than the road where dozens of young children play (Gilford). Cars race by because it’s a straight shot with no stop signs. Seems like the limit should at least be as low as 70th street. I am writing in strong support of reducing the default speed limit in Edina to 25 mph. In my area of South Cornelia / Lake Edina, I've witnessed numerous near-misses between fast-moving vehicles (going at or above the speed limit) and children on foot or on bicycles. (There are about two dozen kids under middle school age on our street and a similar number around the corner on Hibiscus -- the kids often travel between the two streets via West Shore Drive, where there have been numerous scary incidents.) Just a couple weeks ago, my 11yo son was helping try to lure a neighbor's wayward elderly dog home across Gilford when a speeding vehicle hit the dog (while my son and the neighbor child were nearby). The sound was terrifying. I knew it was just a matter of time before someone or something was hit given the speed that vehicles travel on Gilford Drive. (Coincidentally, Councilperson Fischer happened to walk by with his wife in the aftermath of the accident, though I don't think he understood what was happening at the time. The driver who hit the dog was stopped in the middle of the road. I had to walk into the street into the path of another car that was about to speed around the stopped vehicle and potentially hit the dog a second time, which further illustrated for me the unsafe speeds people travel even when pedestrians, bikes and other impediments are present.) Thank you for this forward-thinking proposal and for the work being done to make Edina's streets more pedestrian- and bike-friendly. We are greatly looking forward to the day when we may enjoy the safety and social benefits of a sidewalk on Gilford Drive thanks to the Safe Routes to School plan. Thank you. Living On a cup de sac near 70th where there is a crosswalk and stop sign- at Tracy. cars often do not even stop at the stop sign or for pedestrians. Cars take off from the stop sign at high speeds- sometimes “peeling” out. We have called many times to the city to complain. Not only lower speed limit but would love to see a permanent sign like on interlachen blvd that shows the speed limit sign and the speedThe driver is currently driving somewhere on 70th. Lots of local plus rush hour “cut through” traffic and HS drivers. Way to fast- oncoming cars sometimes don’t stop for the bus with stop arm out!! Bus driver has to honk- mind u the Sri era are approaching an intersection with stop sign and still blow past the bus! Please help! Map Submissions Street Classification Street Approximate Limits Current Speed Limit Recommended Speed Limit Pin Placed Comment Local Division St Spur Rd to Oxford Ave 30 25 This should be 20 mph. Cars cut through going very fast on Division between Interlachen, through Cooper and Brookside/44th. The city has done a couple of speed gun monitors, but there are even more kids around since the last time a study was done. This is truly an exercise superhighway. There are no sidewalks, and we have a lot of kids on bikes and strollers/wagons come through here. As cars and SUVs speed down the Cooper hill past Circle East, they don't slow down and it is unsafe. Police only enforce when we complain once every couple of years. Please lower the limit even more than 25 (which is absolutely an improvement over the 30 mph!). Todd Park is right at the stop sign, but there are tons of walkers and students crossing Division St there as well. Thank you for your consideration! Local Sunnyside Rd Arden Ave to Grimes Ave 30 25 This should be 20 mph. Numerous children attempt to make use of the crosswalks on Sunnyside to access shops at 44th and France as well as Kojetin Park. The speed limit needs to be 20 mph, just so cars can see and stop for the crosswalks. Local Sunnyside Rd Townes Rd to Curve Ave 30 25 This should be 20 mph. Through the entire year (both winter and summer) residents love walking "the circle" made by towned road, sunnyside and Arden Rd. This area is without sidewalks and is extreamly dangerous given the curvy nature of the street. Local Creek Valley Rd Valley View Rd to CDS 30 25 This should be 20 mph. Creek Valley (off Tracy) road dead- ins at the Edina High School, Children use this road to access the school. Currently the Edina Cross Country teams use this road for training runs. MSA Olinger Blvd Colonial Way to Tracy Ave 30 25 This should be 20 mph. Drivers speed down Olinger Blvd at 35-40+ mph. I cross Olinger Blvd from my home on Jeff Place at least 3 times a day to walk my dogs in Bredesen. It's harrowing sometimes. MSA W 58th St Abbott Ave to Zenith Ave 30 25 This should be 25 mph. Speeding has and is an issue on 58th. The residents around 58th should not have to worry about speeding drivers going to and from work. Local Creek Valley Rd Valley View Rd to CDS 30 25 This should be 20 mph. This road dead ends into the school property and is used by some sports teams. Additionally, it IS twisty and people ZOOM down it. It should be reduced! Local St. Johns Ave Valley View Rd to W 62nd St 30 25 This should be 20 mph. St Johns is used as a means of getting to many of the cul-de-sacs further south and generates a significant amount of traffic off Valley View that often travels at unsafe speeds through a residential neighborhood. Local Casco Ave Bridge St to Country Club Rd 30 25 This should be 20 mph. The country club steets are narrow, have parked cars and are full of kids playing. Only one car can drive down a street at a time. There is no safe way to ever drive these streets at over 20 mph. MSA Wooddale Ave Wooddale Ln to Wooddale Gln 30 25 This should be 25 mph. Please make Wooddale 25 mph. Drivers routinely fly down our street at speeds much higher than 30 mph. 25 mph would make our street safer for everyone! MSA Gleason Rd Gleason Cir to Scotia Dr 30 25 This should be 30 mph. Enforce existing. Main travel corridor. MSA Valley View Rd Lois Ln to Susan Ave 30 25 This should be 30 mph. Valley View Rd. south of 62 should stay at 30 mph MSA Valley View Rd Grace Ter to Lois Ln 30 25 This should be 30 mph. Keep existing. Heavy usage. Monitor for speeders. MSA Normandale Rd Eden Ave to Wind Rd 30 25 This should be 30 mph. Frontage Roads should stay 30 mph MSA Wooddale Ave W 53rd St to W 54th St 30 25 This should be 30 mph. Wooddale Ave between 50th and Valley View should be 30 mps MSA Blake Rd Saxony Rd to Jeffrey Ln 30 25 This should be 30 mph. Blake Road north of Vernon should stay at 30 mph, which is reasonable given the distance of this road between Vernon and Interlachen MSA Valley View Rd W 60th St to Ryan Ave 30 25 This should be 30 mph. Valley view from 60th to Hwy 62 should remain 30 mph. Again, this needs to be slightly quicker than "neighborhood streets" so that it encourages vehicles to take the main route. MSA Valley View Rd St. Johns Ave to Wooddale Ave 30 25 This should be 30 mph. Valley View Rd should remain 30 to encourage traffic to avoid the neighborhood streets. MSA W 66th St West Shore Dr to Cornelia Cir 30 25 This should be 30 mph. This road has minimal residential and should stay at 30 mph MSA Cahill Rd Amundson Ave to Dewey Hill Rd 30 25 This should be 30 mph. Cahill Road should stay at 30 due to the lack of residential housing MSA Dewey Hill Rd Shannon Dr to Coventry Way 30 25 This should be 30 mph. Dewey Hill should stay 30 mph as a major throughway MSA Hilary Ln Braemar Blvd to Gleason Rd 30 25 This should be 30 mph. Braemar Blvd and Dewey Hill Road should stay at 30 mph as they are wide streets and reasonable to travel at that speed MSA Hilary Ln Braemar Blvd to Gleason Rd 30 25 This should be 30 mph. Main travel corridor. Could be better enforced for speeders. MSA Wooddale Ave W 50th St to Wooddale Ln 30 25 This should be 30 mph. Wooddale Ave S from 50th to Valley View should remain 30 mph. This will continue to serve as a more "main thoroughfare" for vehicles so that they will quit "cutting through" the streets with kids playing on them. There are multiple stop signs on Wooddale to help ensure speeds don't get out of control. MSA W 50th St Indianola Ave to Halifax Ave 30 25 This should be 30 mph. I believe the speed limit on 50th should remain 30 mph from Wooddale Ave S. east to Halifax Ave S. The traffic along 50th is already clogged and there are lights at Wooddale and Halifax to assist with pedestrian crossing. But we LOVE the idea of reducing the speed limit in/around 50th/France/Market/Halifax shopping district where there are so many pedestrians! Local Casco Ave Bridge St to Country Club Rd 30 25 This should be 20 mph. The country club steets are narrow, have parked cars and are full of kids playing. Only one car can drive down a street at a time. There is no safe way to ever drive these streets at over 20 mph. Local Arden Ave Sunnyside Rd to Bridge St 30 25 This should be 20 mph. Arden is used as a cut through from Grimes/Sunnyside to 50th and cars fly down the street, including local restaurant delivery vehicles. It should be 20mph Local W 49th St Townes Rd to France Ave 30 25 This should be 20 mph. W 49th has become a thoroughfare for people seeking to bypass the stoplight at France and 50th. People are driving too fast on 49th, which has a small hill and almost no sidewalks. The result is an unsafe situation that is exacerbated when cars are parked on the street. In addition to a lower speed limit, 49th would benefit from speed bumps and/or other speed control measures. Local West Shore Dr Dunham Dr to Gilford Dr 30 25 This should be 25 mph. West Shore Drive desperately needs a sidewalk as well as a lower speed limit. It is a main thoroughfare for kids traveling to and from school, from the various surrounding parks and for dog walkers and runners who wish to access the Lake Cornelia area. It's downright frightening to walk along West Shore Drive even in nice weather as there's enough fast-moving traffic that pedestrians need to often hop up into peoples' yards to ensure safe distance. I beg my kids to avoid it as much as possible as cars regularly travel much faster than 30 mph. Local Gilford Dr Wooddale Ave to Kellogg Ave 30 25 This should be 25 mph. Gilford Drive is used as a cut- through street during rush hours to avoid 70th Street and shorten the trip between the CPC area and the intersection of 72nd and France. There are many children (roughly two dozen) middle school and younger who regularly travel by bike and on foot with friends. It creates a very unsafe environment where near-misses occur regularly, particularly near the corner of Gilford/Wooddale and Gilford/Kellogg and Gilford/Oaklawn. Local Edina Blvd Sunnyside Rd to Bridge St 30 25 This should be 25 mph. 25 MPH is a great start. Enforcement -- initially with an automated speed sign -- by Edina Police should also accompany this change Local View Ln Schaefer Rd to Vernon Ave 30 25 This should be 25 mph. Cars heading in either direction here tend to increase speeds because of the distance between intersections. I would also like to see speed bumps installed to enforce slower speeds. Local Morningside Rd Ottowa Ave to Oakdale Ave 30 20 This should be 25 mph. It does not seem consistent to have this small segment be 20 mph and does not seem to be enforceable when the rest of the street is 25mph Local W 42nd St Ottowa Ave to Oakdale Ave 30 20 This should be 25 mph. Why is this tiny segment 20 mph when the rest of the street is 25 mph? Local Hansen Rd W 56th St to Grove St 30 25 This should be 30 mph. Hansen Road should stay 30 mph due to the lack of residential and usage of this road. MSA Tracy Ave Hwy 62 to Valley Ln 30 25 This should be 35 mph. Tracy should remain 35 mph from Highland Rd south up until the entrance/exit to Hwy 62. It is a more main road and this section is far enough away from the schools. Comments * File Upload By submttng ths form, I have read and agree to the Data Practces Advsory above. Regardng speed mts on cty owned resdenta roads: Edna shoud fo ow the ead of Mnneapo s and St Pau n ower ng the speed mt on oca resdenta streets to 20 MPH and 25 MPH on arter a streets. There s an obvous safety beneft n reducng a owed speeds on resdenta streets. In a perfect wor d, I'd ke to see the speeds on Creek Va ey Rd (east of the hgh Schoo, not the one by Creek Va ey Eementary) as ow as 15 MPH as our street s a wndy, h y, dead-end street wth mted vsb ty around some turns. There are a coupe of stretches on our dead-end road where cars speed up very rapdy after roundng a corner and wh e they are probaby st under the current 30 MPH speed mt, they acceerate very qucky to approach the current speed mt whch creates obvous safety ssues for anybody on the road, partcuar y the ncreasng number of resdents on our street wth very sma ch dren. Attachments allowed pdf jpg png From: To:Andrew Scipioni; Cc:Chad Millner Subject:Change in speed limits Date:Friday, October 9, 2020 4:12:47 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, My name is Anne Griffiths and I live at 4713 Hibiscus Ave. I am writing in strong support of the proposed speedlimit changes. As a pediatric pulmonologist at Children’s Minnesota and Gillette Children’s, I am sometimesinvolved in the care of pediatric trauma cases. I feel strongly that the decrease in speed limit in our neighborhoodwhich lacks sidewalks and is a major throughway (Hibiscus and West Shore) would be very helpful and prudent.Within 2 blocks we have no fewer than 31 children under the age of 10. There’s a strong sense of community amongthe parents of young children here but many drivers continue to be distracted for different reasons. The injury of achild would be catastrophic for this neighborhood, no matter what variables might have been involved, and it makessense to take what precautions we can to keep this place so special. Additionally, the “walker” zones and desire toavoid group bussing has lead to more young children walking to school. While I would imagine it was rare forsomeone years ago to drive impaired by alcohol in the morning, we know it isn’t rare for some people to text whiledriving today. Distraction is a problem but decreased speed would help pedestrians and bike riders to better react. Iwould also be in support of further consideration to widen the school zone for speed restriction. Thanks very much for helping keep the children safe, Dr. Anne Griffiths From: Cc:Chad Millner; Scott H. Neal; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Mary Brindle (Comcast); Mike Fischer; Ron Anderson Subject:Speed Limit Plan Feedback Date:Friday, October 9, 2020 9:48:14 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To Whom it may concern in regards to Edina’s Reduced Speed Limit Plan. A. Utterly Unenforceable, practically impossible to get a paramedic or fire let alone a police officer inNorth/Northeast Edina. See Consultants report of over a year ago.B. Utterly confusing for senior citizens who have to drive (which Edina has more than any other suburb) becauseyour commitment to mass transit that seniors could use such as a train on the Dan Patch or looking at streetcarsdown France Ave is non existent.C. I currently have to go under 20 mph to get home in my 2 ton Ford truck due to unaccompanied toddlers walkingdown 55th street or children in bicycles who were never taught or don’t care about the rules of the road. Watch howmany adult cyclists blow through the stop signs at 54th and Wooddale or 54th & Minnehaha Blvd.If Edina has a bike and street education program, I’ve never seen it in 35 years of living here but that might requirecommunity policing & we all know that’s never going to happen. By the way Chad, why was the construction crew on 58th street working in the dark tonight when the contractorswere gone for two weeks over July 4th? 58th Street East of France still doesn’t even have its first layer of asphaltdown yet & my mom (who’s 70/senior citizen) has to go miles out of her way to come see her socially distantgrandson. Thanks for piling on to a crap 2020 City of Edina staff & leadership SincerelyAndrew Richard Brown5512 Park PlaceEdina MN 55424 35 year residentEHS class of 94UST class of 98 Sent from my iPhone 1 Andrew Scipioni From: Sent:Saturday, October 10, 2020 8:22 AM To:Andrew Scipioni Subject:Speed limits EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I would ask that the city have a plan to enforce. Those of us who drive on 70th , which has a 25 limit now, can share stories of irritated drivers tailgating when we follow the 25 limit. Sent from my iPhone From: To:ASciponi@edinamn.gov; Chad Millner Subject:Correction to my Feedback form!-Proposed speed limits Date:Sunday, October 11, 2020 10:05:51 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi! This is a P.S. to the Feedback Form I just submitted. I misread the little speed limit inset and thought it said our limit is 25 miles an hour in Brookview Heights, and I said that is reasonable but people drive faster. I now see the correct info-limit is actually 30 MPH, which IS too high. And people still drive too fast. I am so sorry for the inconvenience to you. We are so glad you are looking at this problem and truly hope you can make an impact for safety! Thank you, Rita Younger From: To:Andrew Scipioni; Chad Millner Subject:speed limit Date:Monday, October 12, 2020 6:07:37 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Andrew and Chad, PLEASE lower the speed limit in as many areas as possible. We live four blocks from Cornelia Elementary and can hardly cross 70th street even when we activate the flashing lightsat the crosswalk on Wooddale. People are driving 45-50 mph sometimes during rush hour. Please have more speed traps. Can you use the cameras at the stop lights to measure speed and mail tickets to people? That would be a deterrent. It is very frustrating and dangerous how fast people are going and it is getting worse. Thanks for all you do and hope things will slow down in Edina Paul Zdechlik Virus-free. www.avg.com From: To:Andrew Scipioni Subject:Proposed speed limit changes. Date:Friday, October 9, 2020 7:08:56 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Do not make changes. Edina narrowed the width of streets for ‘green’ purposes. However this change also slowed traffic in my neighborhood. The reality is that drivers won’t slow to 25, so changes accomplish nothing. Bad idea. Bill From: To:Andrew Scipioni Subject:Speed limit initiative by ‘city engineering Dept’ Date:Friday, October 16, 2020 4:05:24 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Andrew We spoke earlier this year about sidewalks and parking on Hibiscus Avenue. Today I spotted the article in the Thursday October 15th sun current. This article states that there is a draft recommendation fromThe city engineering department to use ‘bettertogetheredina’ to reduce the speed limit. This is the opposite of what we should be doing. When we talked about the through- neighborhood traffic around Corneila School and south of 70th I noted that the problem is that 70th is 25 mph and that the surface streets are 30 mph. When he was on the city council, Josh Sprague- who lives right on 70th Street- demanded thatit be 25 mph from 100 to France Avenue. I have followed him up 70th and even he does not keep below 25 mph. At the better together curbside meeting I suggested moving 70th at least to 30 mph to detercut- through traffic on side streets. Now that someone is pushing for lower neighborhood speed limits I say increase the speedlimit on 70th to 35 mph. Leave the surface streets at 30 mph. I attended SouthWest high school, walking or driving to school sometimes twice a day forathletic or band practices. I grew up bicycling on Linden Hills Boulevard, Lake Harriet and all over the city of Minneapolis and speed limits are irrelevant. What that city has decided todo with speed limits is beyond belief. Walking on the surface streets has expanded in my edina neighborhood. I walked daily all summer. Drivers already drive slowly when pedestrians are present. I dropped the kids off at edina schools for 15 years (four school years apart), so crossing townto both campuses- there are so few bicycles in and around EHS and also Southview Middle School in the wintertime that the number is absolutely insignificant. There was one bicyclist, a teacher, who used that same route through the winter weather (one.) After all these years of driving 70th street I am confident that bicycle lanes and speed limitchanges do not help enough people to offset the inconvenience of creating them. Please leave the speeds where they are or increase them to 35 mph. Sincerely, Peter Moe,7436 West Shore Drive Sent from my iPhone From: To:Andrew Scipioni Subject:Lowering the speed limit Date:Saturday, October 17, 2020 12:16:59 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thank you, Andrew,This is a good idea! 20 miles per hour would be even better!We can do this!Judith Felker From: To:Andrew Scipioni Subject:Speed Limit Plan Date:Wednesday, October 21, 2020 12:55:40 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Andrew: I don’t see anything being proposed about Xerxes Avenue. It is posted 30 MPH, but most people drive 40-50 MPH. Please consider doing something on Xerxes. It isn’t an Edina road, but perhaps you can work with the county. Thank you, Gail Forsyth 6300 Xerxes Ave S Edina, MN From: To:Andrew Scipioni Subject:Traffic proposal question Date:Wednesday, October 21, 2020 3:31:21 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, I live at 5604 Dundee Rd, and I was very excited to see the proposed new speed limits! When looking at the map, I saw that a major section of Vernon (including the one that our housebacks up to) is not included in the new proposal as it is marked as a different jurisdiction. Would you please let me know who controls the speed limit on that section of Vernon? Thank you,Sarah Beth Brust From: To:Andrew Scipioni Subject:Stop signs in Country Club Date:Monday, October 26, 2020 8:06:00 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, Feedback is requested on proposed speed limit changes but in our neighborhood (Country Club) it would be best to add stop signs at each/every intersection. Currently it’s inconsistent where stop signs are placed and some intersections in our country club neighborhood have them at 4 sides, some are just on two and it’s confusing to drivers. Nearly every time I’m driving in our neighborhood I see drivers not knowing when and where to stop and miss signs. Thank you. Melissa Sent from my iPhone From:Nick Bauler To:Andrew Scipioni Subject:Speed Limit Submission Date:Tuesday, October 27, 2020 12:29:47 PM Attachments:image001.gif Andrew, A resident from 6933 Southdale Rd (Cathy) wanted to submit correspondence for the Speed Limit Policy update but doesn’t internet access so I took her comments: As she lives along Southdale Rd, she wants the speed limit to be lowered to 20 MPH at the two curves. She also wants all residential streets without a sidewalk to be lowered to 20 MPH in the Cornelia School area, saying with more pedestrians using residential streets, speeds should be lower. Would you be able to include this in the speed limit report? Thanks! Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator952-826-0349 | Fax 952-826-03927450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439NBauler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Stay informed about the City’s response to COVID-19 at EdinaMN.gov/Coronavirus. Need a hand or want to help? VisitBetterTogetherEdina.org/COVID-19. Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: To:Andrew Scipioni Cc:Scott H. Neal; James Hovland; Chad Millner; David Nelson Subject:Re: Your response on Local Speed Limit Evaluation Date:Tuesday, October 27, 2020 1:45:03 PM Attachments:image004.jpgimage005.jpgimage001.gif EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. In any construct, the reduction of residential speeds will be a win for the community. Thank youfor your commitment to this important mission. Rob Get Outlook for iOS From: Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2020 12:07:43 PM To: Cc: Scott H. Neal <sneal@EdinaMN.gov>; James Hovland <jhovland@hovlandrasmus.com>; Chad Millner <cmillner@EdinaMN.gov>; David Nelson <DNelson@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: RE: Your response on Local Speed Limit Evaluation Rob, Thank you for the email. We will consider your comments as we prepare our final recommendation. Your email will be included in the staff report when it goes to the Transportation Commission and City Council. Regards, Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-03927450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Stay informed about the City’s response to COVID-19 at EdinaMN.gov/Coronavirus. Need a hand or want to help? VisitBetterTogetherEdina.org/COVID-19. Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: James Hovland <jhovland@hovlandrasmus.com> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2020 12:42 PM To: > Cc: Scott H. Neal <sneal@EdinaMN.gov>; David Nelson <DNelson@EdinaMN.gov>; Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: RE: Your response on Local Speed Limit Evaluation From:Chad Millner To: Cc:Andrew Scipioni (ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov) Subject:RE: Traffic on 44th St. Date:Thursday, October 29, 2020 8:26:14 AM Karen, Thanks for the note about the potential changes to speed limits. We will include your comments in the review as wedevelop final recommendations for the city council. Thanks,Chad Chad Millner, Director of Engineering952-826-0318 | Fax 952-826-03927450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439cmillner@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.govStay informed about the City's response to COVID-19 at EdinaMN.gov/Coronavirus. Need a hand or want to help?Visit BetterTogetherEdina.org/COVID-19. Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. -----Original Message-----From: Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 4:15 PMTo: Chad Millner <cmillner@EdinaMN.gov>Subject: Traffic on 44th St. EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or openattachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I have lived on 44th St. across from Kjoetin Park since 1991, reducing the speed limit to 25 may help, but I believewe also need the pedestrian light up stop signs (they have them on 50th by City Hall, what a waste!). Our block islong and it’s like the Indy 500 during rush hour! Do something about it now! Karen Ferrara Sent from my iPhone From: To:Chad Millner; Andrew Scipioni Subject:Comments submitted in BT re Local Speed Limits Date:Friday, October 30, 2020 4:56:06 PM Attachments:R.Castellano BT Submittal@10-30-2020 LocalSpeedLimits.pdf EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Chad, Andrew, This afternoon, I submitted comments re Local Speed Limits using the submittal form at BT. I wrote my comments separately, then copied them into the submittal window. All the paragraph spacing disappeared, so the submittal looks like one long paragraph—Not my intent! I later returned to BT, to try re-entering my comments, hoping to see if I could get it to accept and retain paragraph spacing while still in the submittal window, prior to clicking the submit button. However, BT would not allow me to make a second submittal using the form. Attached is a pdf of my comments with paragraph spacing. Roberta Castellano R. Castellano 10-30-2020, Page 1 of 4 I appreciate that the City of Edina is visiting the issue of speed limits on roads under its jurisdiction. First, a correction to the existing speeds map: Parts of Hwy 100 are now 60 mph, including north of Crosstown. I live on the corner of W 49th St and France Ave S, on the Edina side of France Ave. The east side of France Ave is in Minneapolis. Mpls adopted a citywide 20 mph speed limit, unless otherwise posted. Across the street from me, 49th St in Mpls is signed for 20 mph. Along the France Ave border, almost all the Mpls streets are signed for 20mph. I would first like to discuss the matter of sidewalks in relation to our roads. I love France Ave, and cannot imagine why anyone one would choose to not have sidewalks on France Ave, as I told Edina’s then-City Engineer Fran Hoffman in advance of the 1990 France Ave Road Recon. France Ave moves a lot of traffic. 49th St has sidewalk in front of 3 doubles—that’s all. Effectively, 49th St is a “Woonerf”, as are most of the residential streets in Edina. 49th St is a shared space; that is a fact and a good concept. There are no sidewalks on Highway 100, and it is not a shared space, and I think that is good, too. Sidewalks change the character of a street. Some people see them as a positive. Some people see them as a negative, and that a certain quality of life is lost. There are various impacts. Sidewalks communicate and reinforce a negative concept, which is that roads are not a shared space, that roads are for vehicles and not for pedestrians and bicycles. Unarguably, pedestrians, for example, are safer when walking on sidewalks, rather than next to vehicles moving at high speeds. Yet, they are only safe to a point, because ultimately, people go out into the street for a number of reasons, and they need to feel safe, and should be able to be safe, when they are in the street. In other words, the safety afforded by sidewalks is limited. Sidewalks are an infrastructure, and are funded by increased taxes. In many locations where sidewalks have been installed, retaining walls are also installed. Both the new sidewalks and the new retaining walls will have to be periodically maintained with more taxation. Everything always looks so nice and promising when it is new, but just wait until it all becomes aging infrastructure. Ask Minneapolis. Sidewalks must be cleared of snow in the winter. This is a personal burden for residents, unless the City plows the sidewalks, separately from the streets, with more taxes. On some sidewalks, snow piles start to melt on winter days, causing runoff onto sidewalks, which freezes and becomes slippery ice when the temperature inevitably drops. Sometimes, there is freezing rain. Winter events like these can lead people to walk in the street to avoid slipping on icy sidewalks. One option, for the party responsible for the sidewalks, is to apply and re-apply salt throughout the season as needed. But that is another expense and an additional burden. Some facts: 1) sidewalks can be dangerous to walk on at times during the winter, even though shoveled or plowed, 2) sidewalks need salt at certain times to be safe to walk on, and 3) a system (personal or city) entirely separate from City road plows and salt trucks is required to clear sidewalks and keep them safe. R. Castellano 10-30-2020, Page 2 of 4 There is hardly a road in Mpls that does not have sidewalks on both sides, and yet, sidewalks weren’t enough, and Mpls has now lowered speed limits citywide. In other words, to some extent, the expansive and expensive sidewalk (and related retaining wall) infrastructure is a failure. So, let’s not simply follow in Mpls’s footsteps. I often go out into the street. I am accustomed to traffic, both on France and on 49th. There are drivers who utilize 49th St as a faster alternative to Market St. Residents on 49th and on Maple can describe speed issues along the length. I would like to build on the 20 mph that Mpls has set for 49th St, east of France Ave, and make our side 20 mph, too. During my 40 years at this location, just along my stretch of 49th St (the length of my property), cars have struck my stair railings twice (once summer coming up from France, once winter heading down to France), vehicle ran into snowbank, vehicle ran into apartment driveway retaining wall, vehicle parked on street was struck, vehicle did a 180 coming down the hill to France Ave. The City of Edina is proposing a speed limit of 25 mph unless otherwise signed. If the Edina Police were requested to enforce an area, what is the margin of error in speed enforcement? 5 mph? If so, then the enforced speed is 30 mph. If that is the case, then what is the benefit of the change from citywide 30 mph to citywide 25 mph? What to do with Edina’s speed limits for this project? 1) The City of Edina did not post on Better Together the analytical data behind the proposed speed limit changes. I would like the opportunity to review these data prior to the City Council taking action on the speed limit matter. Could you post any of this data for the public? 2) Edina does not need to act in haste. Edina does not need to act on all streets at once. 3) Hold down our tax burden. 4) Take advantage of existing signage. If there is a speed limit already posted, just leave it at that speed for now. The City can always assess any element at a later date. Wooddale, 50th west of Wooddale, 66th, Valley View, the service road east of Hwy 100—these are a few examples of signed roads. 5) Take action on unsigned roads only. Make all unsigned roads 20 mph. I am guessing that most residents on most unsigned roads (no posted speed limit) would be happier if drivers do not exceed 20 mph. 49th St is not signed. To be clear, I am advocating for 20 mph on 49th St. 6) Assess exceptions. I can share a couple: a. A peculiar, one-block segment of Arden Ave. Very oddly, northbound Arden from 51st to 50th St is posted 30 mph (!), in spite of the fact that it is the kind of residential road that is typically not signed in Edina. For uniformity, remove the sign and allow it to be 20 mph, unless the residents are adamant that it remain 30. b. Exception: 50th St from Wooddale to France, which is unsigned but carries 30 mph from the signed portion of 50th St west of Wooddale. 50th St is an important road for vehicular traffic. It should be faster than the neighborhood internal roads. 25 mph seems reasonable only if the neighborhood interiors are 20 mph. East of France Ave, 50th St is signed for 30 mph. R. Castellano 10-30-2020, Page 3 of 4 c. You are familiar with more Edina streets than I am. What other possible exceptions can you think of? 7) Get the word out, give it some time, receive feedback, make future adjustments. 8) Promote the shared-use concept! Celebrate as a positive the fact that most of Edina’s roads are Woonerfs. Reducing most of those roads to 20 mph should help. 9) Assess citizen reports of road segments that have a particularly dangerous aspect, e.g. blind spots. People want to be happy. They don’t want to feel like they are always “dodging the bullet”. In some locations, pedestrians can try to be safe when crossing a road, for example, but safety is not truly possible due to curves or hills causing blind spots. In these areas, assess how many seconds a person has to react to traffic, and drivers have to react to a pedestrian. For example, how many feet of roadway are visible in each direction. How many seconds of visibility does that translate to at various speeds? In these areas, limited length 10, 15, or 20 mph, “crosswalk ahead”, and/or blind spot road signs might be helpful, similar to the blind spot sign for the Country Club service access driveway on the northbound service road on the east side of Hwy 100. 10) Assess other alternatives. For example, in my area, reducing southbound France Ave from two lanes to one lane, simply by striping the roadway, has reduced some of the chaos and danger of vehicles jockeying for lane position, while still allowing vehicles to move quickly and efficiently at most times of the day, which is important because France Ave is such an important road for getting from here to there, for handling high volumes of traffic, for being an emergency route, and, as an emergency route, for being able to be plowed equally quickly and efficiently (e.g. no messy, obstructive curb bump-outs). In the past, it seemed like there was at least one crash every year at 49th and France. That is not the case now. As a matter of fact, both north and south of 50th, I have observed more instances of polite conduct by drivers, which is more effective in the context of fewer driving lanes, because there are fewer collaborators required for ensuring safe road crossings, and by that I am referring to crossings by both pedestrians and vehicles. I am well aware that France Ave is a County road and not under your jurisdiction, but wanted to mention this because there have been some improvements without obstructing traffic. 11) Maintain financial support for the Edina Police so that they can continue to address such issues as impaired driving and red light running. I can mention that in the past year, I have observed on different days, during the daytime, drivers of a very expensive car and a very expensive SUV run the red light at 50th & Halifax. Both 50th & Halifax have sidewalks. Red light runners are a threat to other drivers as well as to pedestrians. No one is safe when drivers run red lights. Equally dangerous, pedestrians should not step out into the street in front of a moving vehicle, as though the vehicle were not there, simply because they are at a crosswalk. I have witnessed that, too. These are exceptions to normal conduct, but they are a reality. R. Castellano 10-30-2020, Page 4 of 4 12) At what speeds are people actually driving? To assist in review and discussion, it might be helpful to publicly post online, the data gained from speed studies. In order to get more accurate results, the police department speed box should not be present while speeds are being assessed. 13) Keep apprised of future technologies on the horizon. Might some of today’s traffic concerns be reduced or eliminated with some future technological changes to vehicles? How do we address speed and traffic issues now, while being mindful that some issues might change in the future? 14) Keep in mind that the vast majority of vehicle trips each day result in no crashes. Thank you. From: To:Andrew Scipioni Subject:Local Speed Limit Evaluation Date:Monday, November 2, 2020 10:11:51 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Andrew, My apologies, I know the public comment period has ended, but over this weekend, we had several instances of people roaring down our street in our quiet neighborhood. I'd like to suggest that any road with a cul-de-sac or no outlet have a speed limit of 20 mph. Iknow that there are a lot across the city of Edina, but the majority of these road types have families and kids playing / running from house to house / crossing the street / riding bikes,etc. Our neighborhood is filled with kids and every week our neighbors and I remind those driving down our street making deliveries, picking up trash, etc that there's no need to speed throughour short / no outlet road. Whipping down our road at 30 and the proposed 25 is still WAY to fast for a no-exit location. We already have issues with drivers not stopping at our one stop sign, so to limit the speedwould be even more helpful. Again, my apologies for this late feedback, but this rule would really help us keep our street safe. Thanks so much, Charlotte From:Nick Bauler To:Andrew Scipioni Subject:RE: Speed Limit Submission Date:Monday, November 2, 2020 1:12:25 PM Attachments:image001.gif Hey Andrew, I received a voicemail Friday from the same resident who provided feedback for me mentioned below. They wanted to include the same stretch of Southdale Rd has 18 kids who reside within the area. Passing that along! Let me know if you would need anything else or have any questions. Thanks again, Nick Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator952-826-0349 | Fax 952-826-03927450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439NBauler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Stay informed about the City’s response to COVID-19 at EdinaMN.gov/Coronavirus. Need a hand or want to help? VisitBetterTogetherEdina.org/COVID-19. Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2020 12:31 PM To: Nick Bauler <NBauler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: RE: Speed Limit Submission Yes, I will. Thank you. Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-03927450 Metro Blvd. | Edina, MN 55439ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Stay informed about the City’s response to COVID-19 at EdinaMN.gov/Coronavirus. Need a hand or want to help? VisitBetterTogetherEdina.org/COVID-19. Share your thoughts and ideas with the City online! Visit www.BetterTogetherEdina.org. From: Nick Bauler <NBauler@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2020 12:30 PM To: Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Speed Limit Submission Andrew, From: To:Andrew Scipioni Subject:Lower speed limit PLEASE Date:Monday, November 2, 2020 5:03:59 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello Mr. Scipioni, It’s my understanding Edina is considering lowering some/ all residential speed limits from 30mph to 25mph. Please make this happen. In fact I’ll take it a step further and say residential streets without lane lines should be 20mph. I live on Aspen Road, which is a short cul de sac, no sidewalks. From the stop sign at the corner to the end of cul de sac it’s the length of six homes... SIX!!! I would welcome a traffic study that would show me a scenario where it would be appropriate to gun it to 30mph before slamming on the brakes to make the u-turn at the cul de sac. I’ll also add on this short stretch of Aspen Road (the length of six yards) there are 19 children. We regularly have to yell at people to slow down (most delivery drivers who are lost and don’t realize it’s a dead end) City wide slowing down to 20 mph is the only way to get people to actually wake up and realize how fast 30 mph really is. For once let’s take a cue from Minneapolis and slow down to 20mph. If you’d like to do a traffic study I know our neighborhood would welcome it. Please contact me anytime if I can assist. Leah Palazzolo Sent from my iPhone Leah Sent from my iPhone Leah Sent from my iPhone From: To:Andrew Scipioni Subject:Speed limit in Edina neighborhood Date:Tuesday, November 10, 2020 3:56:43 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Andrew, I have just been made aware of the new speed limit proposal in Edina neighborhoods. I apologize if mytiming may be delayed for commenting but I feel strongly that I need to reach out still. I live on the corner of Tamarac and Aspen Road in Edina. Every single day I watch multiple cars andtrucks blow through the stop sign and race down our streets. I have tried to flag cars down, havesignaled to drivers to slow down, have run after and stopped cars and have put signs in my yard toremind cars to slow down. It still doesn't change the fact that people are whipping through ourneighborhood unsafely. I have five young children under the age of 7yo and there are at least 40 other young children in ourneighborhood. As much as we try to teach them safety about cars and being in the street, we expectdrivers to drive safely and responsibly throughout our neighborhoods. I am pleading with you to strongly consider limiting the speed to 20mph. We are a no-exit neighborhoodor cul-de-sacs-20mph is PLENTY. Thank you! Sincerely, Tricia Borg 1 Andrew Scipioni From:Lori Richman > Sent:Tuesday, December 22, 2020 1:01 PM To:Andrew Scipioni; Kirk Johnson Subject:Uniform Speed Limit input for the City Council EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Andrew, will you please include this email from Kirk and me in the packet of Speed Limit proposal info for the City Council? Thanks so much! Mr. Mayor and City Council members, As Chair and Vice Chair of the Transportation Commission for Edina, we would like to offer our thoughts regarding the proposed speed limits plan for the City. We understand your wishes for an easy-to- understand, uncomplicated, uniform speed throughout the residential streets in Edina. As two of our biggest neighboring cities (Minneapolis and St. Louis Park) have chosen to go with a tiered structure, with a speed limit of 20 mph on residential streets, we believe that if we are to set speed limits in Edina at a different rate, this would also lend itself to confusion for drivers in Edina. For this reason and that of safety for our residents, we feel very strongly that the uniform residential street speed limit, and default speed in Edina should be consistent with our neighbors at 20 mph. In addition to consistency with our neighbors, if we examine this from a safety perspective, we believe that 20 mph is the safest vehicle speed on all streets where pedestrians and bicyclists share the space. From parked cars, children playing, and the nature of Edina's curved and sight-limited streets, 20, to borrow Minneapolis' slogan, is plenty! In addition, we are sure you are aware that vehicles routinely go faster than the posted speed. If 25 were to be the set/default speed, we are confident that vehicles on our residential streets will frequently approach 30 mph. In reality, we believe that both 25 and 30 mph on these streets is quite fast and unsafe. In accordance with the initial proposal (July of 2020) for a tiered system, the data strongly supports the slower speed limit. If we truly want "Living Streets" in Edina, 20 mph is, we believe, the best option for a uniform/default speed. We understand that this is an important decision that can create some emotion with Edina residents. The recent public engagement feedback suggests that, when specifically asked, Edina residents are roughly split on the speed limit change. However, over the years in surveys, residents have consistently voiced their desire for slower speeds in their neighborhoods. While NACTO (National Association of City Transportation Officials) suggests this "middle route" of 25 mph, a compromise of sorts, when selecting the default or uniform speed, it is our opinion that the science from crash and safety data as well as livability data supports a 20 mph speed limit. Further, we believe that the sheer volume of our residential streets, as compared with the volume of other streets in our City, are "MINOR" streets as identified by NACTO, and therefore should be the guiding factor in setting the uniform speed. The strategy of setting a uniform speed based on a "compromise" does not create the safe and liveable residential streets we wish for in Edina. In this case, the vision we have for our community as liveable and multi-modal, from the Comprehensive Plan to the Bike/Ped Plan to Living Streets supports calming and slowing down motor vehicle traffic in our neighborhoods, all of which point to 20 mph as a uniform speed. Our Living Streets policy asks us to "improve the current and future quality of life of the public." We believe that the liveability of our community is not a compromise, and that the speed be set at a rate that is safe and right for Edina. Finally, based on observation of consistent behavior, we believe that whatever speed limit is set will frequently be exceeded by a few miles per hour, often 5 mph over the set limit. As our police department generally does not enforce residential speed limits particularly those that exceed the existing limit by 5 mph 2 or less, we ask that the speed be set low enough to account for human behavior and also supports the police department as they enforce this new ordinance. At our Commission Meeting on December 14, we had a lengthy conversation about the proposal. While we did not vote on a recommendation as this was not requested of us, the two of us believe so strongly in a 20 mph uniform speed, we want to go on record with our concerns. We would be happy to discuss this with you at your convenience. Thank you so much for your consideration! Sincerely, Lori Richman, Chair, Edina Transportation Commission Kirk Logan Johnson, Vice Chair, Edina Transportation Commission - lori Lori Richman 1 Andrew Scipioni From:poppy plante Sent:Thursday, February 4, 2021 10:15 AM To:Andrew Scipioni Subject:speed limits--appreciation Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged EXTERNAL EMAIL ALERT: This email originated from outside the City of Edina. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mr. Scipioni, Thank you so much for all your department is doing to keep Edina a safe and pleasant community! (https://www.startribune.com/suburbs-looking-to-decrease-speed-limits/600018900/) As homeowners who paid the full assessment for the re-do on West 70th a few years back, we support ongoing initiatives to control speeds. As you already know, West 70th continues to be a challenge--speeding is back up to pre-renovation levels. In addition to Cornelia School, there are at least 16 children under the age of 18 living on West 70th just between West Shore and HW 100. We continue to have near misses with speeding, negligent drivers as we clear snow from driveway aprons on 70th. It would help immensely to have an electronic speed reminder placed across from CPC Church as people exit HW 100 to eastbound W. 70th. Regards, Anne Marie Plante 4801 West 70th rj rj ")rjrj ") ")")")") ")") ") ")") rj rjrj")")")")kj rj rj ") rj rjrj rjrj rj ") rj rj rjrj rj rj rjrj rj ")rj")") ")kj ") ") ")") rjrjrjrjrj rj rj rj rj rj rj rj rjrj rjkj rj rj rj rj rj rj rj rj ") rjrj rj rj rj ")") ") ") ") ")") rj rj ") rj ") ") ") ") rjrjrjrj rj rj rj rjrj rj rjrj rj ") rj") ")")") ") ")") ") ")")") rj rj rj rj ")")")rj rj kjkj kj ") ") ")") ")")") ")")")")")")")")")")") ")")")")")") ") rj ") rj rj rj rj rj rj rj rjrj rj rj ") rjrj rjrj rj rj rj rj rj rj rj rj rj rj rj rjrj rj rj rj rj ")") rj ")")")")")rj rj ") ")") ")")")rjrjrjrj rj rj rjrj rj ")") ") ")rj ")rj rj rj ") rj ")") rj ")ÑF ÑFÑF ÑF ÑF ÑF ÑF ÑF ÑF ÑFÑF ÑF ÑF ÑF ÑF ÑF ÑF ÑF ÑF ÑF ÑFÑF ÑF ÑF ÑFÑF ÑF ÑF ÑF ÑFÑFÑF ÑF ÑFÑF ÑF ÑFÑFÑFÑF ÑF ÑF ÑFÑF ÑF ") GFGF GFGF GFGF GFGFGF GF GF GFGF GF GF GF ") ") GØ ") ")GFGFGF GF GF GFGF GFGFGF ÑF ÑF ÑFÑF ÑFÑF GFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGF ÑF GFGFGFGFGFGF GFGF GF GF GF rj GF GF GFGF GFGØGF GFGFGF BLAKE RDSCHAEFER RDVERNON AVEFRANCE AVE SXERXES AVE SCAHILL RD70TH ST W 66TH ST W YORK AVE SINTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 4 4 T H S T W 50TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST W GLEASON RD70TH ST W 76TH ST W DEWEY HILL RD VALLEY VIEW RD VALLEY VIEW RD MINNESOTA DR78TH ST W HWY 100HWY 169HWY 169HWY 100HWY 62 HWY 62 City of EdinaSpeed Limit Signage Plan / Engineering DeptApril 2021 Implementation Plan ")Remain, kj Remove, kj Replace, 20-15 rj Replace, 30-25 rj Replace, 30-Gateway ÑF Add, 15 GF Add, 25 GØ Add, 30 ÑF Add, Gateway rj Replace, 40/35-30 Proposed Speed Limit Other Jurisdiction 15 mph (School Zone) 30 mph 25 mph 20 mph 20 mph (School Zone) Citywide Speed Limit Reduction August 4, 2021 Agenda •Feb 17 CC Meeting Summary •Review ordinance, implementation plan Action Requested •Approve Ordinance 2021-09 (1st reading) •Approve implementation plan EdinaMN.gov 2 •Staff presented; •-Recommended approach •-Public engagement report •-Transportation Commission comments •Council approved approach, authorized development of implementation plan Feb 17 City Council Meeting EdinaMN.gov 3 Comprehensive Approach EdinaMN.gov 4 •Long-term success requires multiple strategies; •-Minimum roadway widths •-New pedestrian/ cyclist/transit infrastructure •-Pedestrian crossing improvements •-Community education/events •(Open Streets, Bike to Work Day) Ordinance 2021-09 Chapter 26, Article 1 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following provision: Speed on city streets. The city engineer may establish speed limits for city streets under the city’s jurisdiction in accordance with the provisions set forth at Minnesota Statutes Section 169.14. A comprehensive listing and the procedures relied upon to establish speed limits under this section shall be kept on file by the city engineer, and will be made readily available for public inspection. EdinaMN.gov 5 Signage Plan •“The city must erect appropriate signs to display the speed limit.” •245 signs to be removed/replaced/added •PW Street Division will install •Installation expected to conclude by end of 2021 EdinaMN.gov 6 Enforcement Strategy •Verbal warnings and citations at traffic stops •Occasional targeted enforcement •Movable, radar speed trailer •No additional enforcement or police resources are recommended •-Data indicates most drivers on local streets are traveling at or below the posted speed limits •-Most effective strategy is physical changes to streets (lane narrowing, selective on-street parking, traffic calming treatments, etc.) EdinaMN.gov 7 Communication Strategy •Edition: Edina story •“Agenda: Edina” •Sun-Current ad •Website updates •Social media/Nextdoor posts •PSAs/YouTube ads •Double-sided info cards for EPD •Display at Southdale Center •Tabling at City events EdinaMN.gov 8 Agency Coordination •8 miles of shared ownership •Staff discussing changes with other cities •Changes on these streets will be postponed until agreements are reached EdinaMN.gov 9 HOPKINS ST. LOUIS PARK MINNE- APOLIS RICHFIELDBLOOMINGTON Funding •Signage and communications are estimated at $10,000 •Funding recommended from Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund •2021 budget has sufficient funds; no impact anticipated on scheduled capital projects EdinaMN.gov 10 Evaluation Plan •Traffic and crash data will be collected and reviewed 2 years before and after implementation •No changes will be recommended until after evaluation period •Staff will present evaluation report to Council with recommendations on enforcement, communication and infrastructure EdinaMN.gov 11 Council Action/Next Steps •Lower speed limits support goals in Comprehensive Plan, Living Streets Plan, Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan, Active Routes to School Plan •Approve Ordinance 2021-09 and grant first reading •Approve implementation plan EdinaMN.gov 12 Date: August 17, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-66: Approving the 2022 Budget and Dues Increase for the I-494 Corridor Commission Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution 2021-66 approving the 2022 budget and dues increase for the I-494 Corridor Commission. INTRODUCTION: At the July 24 board meeting, the I-494 Corridor Commission adopted the 2022 budget and membership dues increase from $0.50 per resident to $0.53. Per our Joint Powers Agreement, the Council of each member party shall approve, modify or reject the proposed Commission budget and the party's financial contribution. The exact amount of this increase is currently unknown as the Commission relies upon the Metropolitan Council's population estimates and those for 2020 are not yet available. Using 2019 population estimates, the increase for the City of Edina would be approximately $1,600. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-66: Approving 2022 Budget and Dues for I-494 Corridor Commission I-494 Corridor Commission Letter to Edina RESOLUTION NO. 2021-66 APPROVING THE 2022 BUDGET AND 2022 DUES INCREASE FOR THE I-494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION WHEREAS, The City of Edina is a member of the I-494 Corridor Commission, a joint powers organization with the purpose of more effectively and efficiently moving people and goods around the I-494 Corridor; and WHEREAS, the Joint Powers Agreement for the I-494 Corridor Commission requires members to “approve, modify or reject the proposed Commission budget and the Party’s financial contribution” each calendar year; and WHEREAS, The I-494 Corridor Commission has received a one-time allocation of $300,000 from the State of Minnesota for telework outreach to be used over the next two years; and WHEREAS, The I-494 Corridor Commissioners have recommended a $583,055 budget for 2022 (an increase of $23,825 from the 2021 budget), which will be primarily funded by federal and state government grants; and WHEREAS, The I-494 Corridor Commissioners have recommended a membership dues increase from $0.50 per resident in 2021 to $0.53 per resident in 2022 to cover expenses that will not be eligible for State telework funds; and WHEREAS, the proposed dues increase for the City of Edina would be approximately $1,600 based on 2019 population estimates from the Metropolitan Council, and 2020 population estimates are not yet available; and WHEREAS, the 2022 budget and dues increase is intended to advance the successful work of the I-494 Corridor Commission during a time when several major freeway construction projects will be underway; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Edina approves the I-494 Corridor Commission 2022 budget of $583,055 and the 2022 dues increase to $0.53 per resident. Adopted this 17th day of August, 2021. Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 17, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of ___________, 2021. ________________________ City Clerk Date: August 17, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-67: Accepting Donations Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2021-67 accepting donations. INTRODUCTION: To comply with State Statute, all donations to the City must be accepted by resolution and approved by two- thirds majority of the Council. See attached resolution with list of donations. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-67: Accepting Donations RESOLUTION NO. 2021-67 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Police • Edina Crime Prevention Fund $15,000 Safety Equipment Art Center • Robert & Marilee Kistler $100 Memorial for Phyllis Peterson • Doris Hedsten $25 Memorial for Phyllis Peterson Dated: August 17, 2021 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 17, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _______ day of ___________________, 2021. City Clerk Date: August 17, 2021 Agenda Item #: VII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Scott H. Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Introduce Finance Director Alisha McAndrews Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: City Manager Scott Neal will introduce Alisha McAndrews, new Finance Director. Date: August 17, 2021 Agenda Item #: VII.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Scott H. Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Introduce Police Chief Todd Milburn Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: City Manager Scott Neal will introduce Todd Milburn, Edina P olice Chief. Date: August 17, 2021 Agenda Item #: VII.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Brian E. Olson, Public Works Director Item Activity: Subject:Snow and Ice Management: Response to Citizen Concerns Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Information only. INTRODUCTION: The Public Works Department is excited for this opportunity to present our snow and ice control management plan and our efforts to reduce chlorides in our natural water bodies. Staff will provide a presentation outlining our strategies and accomplishments on this very important topic. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Presentation Snow and Ice Management City of Edina Overview •Introductions of key Staff •Our existing snow plow policy •Outline Accomplishments since 2016 •Results •Outline Future Strategies •Questions EdinaMN.gov 2 Introductions •John Scheerer, City of Edina since 1985 –36 years •Shawn Anderson, City of Edina since 1999 –22 years •Gunnar Kaasa, City of Edina since 2006 -15 years •Brian Olson, Public Works since 1992 –30 years Total Experience 103 years EdinaMN.gov 3 Snow Plowing Program •With over 230 centerline miles and almost 66 miles of City maintained sidewalk (93 miles total), our snowplow operation is 2nd to none. •During a typical snowplow event, the Public Works Dept utilizes: •25 plow trucks •4 loaders, 5 sidewalk plows •Parks Department plows park parking lots, trails, etc. EdinaMN.gov 4 Snow Plow Policy •Edina finds that it is in the best interest of the residents of the City to assume basic responsibility for control of snow and ice on City streets. Reasonable ice and snow control is necessary for routine travel and emergency services and necessary for the health, safety and welfare of the traveling public. •The City of Edina begins snow or ice control operations when there is: •Snow accumulation of 1.5 inches or more; •Drifting of snow that causes problems for travel; or •Icy conditions which seriously affect travel. EdinaMN.gov 5 Competing Demands EdinaMN.gov 6 Accomplishments since 2016 •Every Snow Plow Driver in the PW and Parks maintenance Dept have been certified by the MPCA for Smart Salting Level I or parking lot and sidewalks. (Training and Education –behaviorial) •In 2016, in partnership with the watershed district, we expanded the salt brine station to include another blending cabinet and a 4,000 gal mixing tank. (process improvement) •In 2016, we implemented a streamlined Edina 311 app for complaints about too much salt. (Both Behavioral and process improvement) •Completed the installation of pre wet tanks on all of the 25 snow plow trucks in 2016 (process improvement) •In 2017-21, we volunteered to participate for a regional study for the Local Road Research Board by the University of Minnesota (Adaptive Management to Improve De-Icing Operations) •In 2018, expanded the salt brine station by adding an additional 9,000 gal tank to allow us to use different chemicals to increase effectiveness of melting at lower temperatures (process improvement) •In 2018, Edina served as a member of the Technical Advisory Committee for MnDOT salt sustainability program. Goal was to implement BMPs for MnDOT. (Educational) EdinaMN.gov 7 EDINA PLOW EQUIPMENT AND ANTI-ICING EQUIPMENT EdinaMN.gov 8 Edina was the focus of this Study •Adaptive Management to Improve Deicing Operations, Larry Baker, Minnesota DOT. •Summary: The goal of this research is to find ways to further reduce the use of deicing salts by linking automatically collected data from salting trucks to automatically collected water quality data. The outcomes would take adaptive management (AM) for de-icing operations to a new level that, achieving both traffic mobility goals and water quality goals (lower chloride, Cl). Researchers will communicate this information throughout the state through a series of workshops for public works audiences (led by Fortin Consulting), EdinaMN.gov 9 Salt Brine System (2016-2021) EdinaMN.gov 10 2018 •Served as a member of the Technical Advisory Committee for MnDOT to create their Salt Sustainability Program: •Development of Resources to Support Minnesota DOT’s Salt Sustainability Program -2018 EdinaMN.gov 11 Accomplishments (Continued) •2019 Purchased and implemented Salt brine equipment at the 50th France and completed installation on all 5 sidewalk machines (Process and procedural) •2019 In cooperation with the Nine Mile WD, Utilized JOMA blades on 4 plow trucks to aid in salt reduction (Process improvement) •2020 Implemented New Anti Icing truck to aid in the effectiveness of preventing the bond between a road and ice before the storm. (Process improvement) •2020 Built covered salt storage facility to allow for unloading to occur under cover thereby minimizing salt loss (Process improvement) •2016-2020 Annual Snow Day Training (Education) •2016-2020 Annual calibration of all trucks (Process/Education/Behavioral) •Continue to use Precise (AVL) to look @ driver habits (Behavioral) EdinaMN.gov 12 JOMA Blades EdinaMN.gov 13 Anti icing Equipment (2016-2021) EdinaMN.gov 14 EdinaMN.gov 15 Precise AVL system EdinaMN.gov 16 How effective are these accomplishments? •2016 Information to EEC •Average Salt Use 2010-2016 3,200 tons per year •2021 Information •Average Salt Use 2016-2021 <2,300 tons per year •30.1%reduction of salt use since 2016 EdinaMN.gov 17 Future strategies to reduce salt use •Continue to shift from granular products to liquid products to prevent ice pavement bond (Anti-icing and pre-wetting) •Continue to research Equipment upgrades (JOMA Blades etc) to deliver lower application rates while maintaining effectiveness (LRRB) •Continue to research temperature appropriate material (Magnesium Chloride and Calcium chloride) •Consider pavement sensors on plow trucks (LRRB) •Brine system upgrades (as needed for additional trials) •Continue annual calibration of equipment •Fully utilize the new covered salt storage facility •Continue to support narrowing of streets under the Living Streets policy •Training for snow plow operators and Supervisors (Winter Road Maintenance Workshop, Ice Control Best Practices, Winter Parking Lot and Sidewalk Maintenance, etc) •Continue to attend Fall Maintenance Expo •Annual Road Salt Symposium •Annual Snow Day •Continued partnership with Watershed Districts •Responding to requests for salt clean-up EdinaMN.gov 18 Questions? •Brian Olson, Director of Public Works •John Scheerer –Forecast service, predicting a storm •Shawn Anderson –AVL Equipment, Transition to liquids •Gunnar Kaasa –Equipment Operations, New Equipment technology EdinaMN.gov 19 EXAMPLES OF APPLICATION RATE CHARTS USED IN MN EdinaMN.gov 20 How Salt works •https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53Z32yS7ihs EdinaMN.gov 21 Salt Brine Concentration EdinaMN.gov 22 Date: August 17, 2021 Agenda Item #: VIII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-65: Approving Drainage Right- of-Way Easement Vacation at 7300 Claredon Drive Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to close the public hearing at noon on August 30 and continue action to the September 9 City Council meeting. INTRODUCTION: Gene and Katie Munster have applied for a vacation of a drainage and utility easement at 7300 Claredon Drive. Staff recommends approval as the easements are not needed for public purposes. Staff is requesting Council approval immediately instead of carrying over this item for approval to the next Council meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-65: Approving Drainage Right-of-Way Easement Vacation at 7300 Claredon Drive Public Hearing Notice Application Staff Presentation RESOLUTION NO. 2021-65 VACATING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 7300 CLAREDON DRIVE WHEREAS, an application was received on June 21, 2021 from Gene and Katie Munster of 7300 Claredon Drive, dedicated in the plat of Schey’s Park View Third Addition, requesting that the drainage and utility easement be vacated; and WHEREAS, two weeks published and posted notice was given and the hearing was held on August 17, 2021, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the drainage and utility easement is not needed for public purposes; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota: 1. That the following described drainage and utility easement is hereby vacated: That particular drainage and utility easement as dedicated on the plat of Holand's 1st Addition being the west 5.00 feet of the following described property, lying southerly of the north 5.00 feet thereof: Lot 11, except that part thereof lying southeasterly of a line drawn from the most northerly corner of Lot 10 to a point on the west line of Lot 11 distance 30 feet north of the southwest corner thereof, Block 1, Holand's 1st Addition. And, that particular drainage and utility easement as dedicated on the plat of Schey's Park View Third Addition being the east 5.00 feet Lot 3, Block 3, Schey's Park View Third Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. And, that particular drainage and utility easement as dedicated on the plat of Schey's Park View Third Addition being the east 5.00 feet Lot 4, Block 3, Schey's Park View Third Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 2. The vacation shall not affect the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling the electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, water pipes, mains and hydrants thereon or thereunder, if any, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such way or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto. 3. That the Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute all documents necessary, in the opinion of the City Attorney, to affect the transfer of this property. Adopted this 9th day of September, 2021. Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 9, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _____ day of __________, 2021. _______________________________ City Clerk Public Hearing Notice City Council, 7 p.m. Wednesday, August 17, 2021 July 30, 2021 English: This and other public hearing notices can be viewed online at EdinaMN.gov/PublicNotices. Español: Este y otros avisos de audiencia pública se pueden ver en línea en EdinaMN.gov/PublicNotices. Soomaali: Tan iyo ogeysiisyo kale oo dhagaysi dadweyne ayaa lagu daawan karaa onlayn ahaan EdinaMN.gov/PublicNotices. Vacation of Public Right-of-Way Easement at 7300 Claredon Drive LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT: That particular drainage and utility easement as dedicated on the plat of Holand's 1st Addition being the west 5.00 feet of the following described property, lying southerly of the north 5.00 feet thereof: Lot 11, except that part thereof lying southeasterly of a line drawn from the most northerly corner of Lot 10 to a point on the west line of Lot 11 distance 30 feet north of the southwest corner thereof, Block 1, Holand's 1st Addition. And, that particular drainage and utility easement as dedicated on the plat of Schey's Park View Third Addition being the east 5.00 feet Lot 3, Block 3, Schey's Park View Third Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. And, that particular drainage and utility easement as dedicated on the plat of Schey's Park View Third Addition being the east 5.00 feet Lot 4, Block 3, Schey's Park View Third Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. REQUEST: Utility and drainage easement vacation at 7300 Claredon Drive. See attached lot survey. HOW TO PARTICIPATE: Public hearing input can be provided in a variety of ways to the Planning Commission and City Council. Options 1 & 2 are available now: 1) Complete the Public Hearing Comment Form online at: https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/7300-claredon 2) Leave a voicemail with your feedback. (952-826-0377) Options 3 & 4 are available the night of the public hearing meetings: 3) Watch the meeting and call in to provide testimony. a. Edina TV (Comcast Channels 813 or 16) b. Facebook.com/EdinaMN c. EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeetings City Council: Call in to provide live testimony at the August 17 meeting, 1-800-374- 0221. The Conference ID 6654254 4) Attend the meetings to provide testimony, City Hall Council Chambers, 4801 W. 50th St. DEADLINES: The City Council is scheduled to make a decision at its Sep 9 meeting. Deadline for comments via voicemail or BetterTogetherEdina.org is Noon, Monday, August 30 FURTHER INFORMATION: City of Edina Engineering, 7450 Metro Blvd, Edina, MN 55439, 952-826-0371 To view the proposed easement vacation, visit the Better Together Edina website for this specific project at: https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/7300-claredon City Of Edina, Minnesota ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Blvd, Edina, Minnesota 55439 Phone (952) 826-0371 Fax (952) 826-0392 Applicant Address PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY VACATION APPLICATION Gene & Katie Munster Print Name 7300 Claredon Dr. Edina, MN 55439 Street City/State Zip Telephone No. 55439 Fax No. I hereby petition the City Council of the City of Edina to vacate all of the following described public right of way pursuant to M.S. 412.851 and Edina Code Section 24-191: q Street q Alley Utility Easement q Drainage Easement q Other Legal description of the area proposed to be vacated (Please note all legal descriptions shall be transmitted electronically in a Word documents to the City of Edina Engineering Department: Liz Moore at Imoore(ttledinarna goy): Does the area proposed to be vacated or any part thereof terminate at or abut upon any public water? q Yes No Please note if the area requested to be vacated terminates at or abuts upon any public water, no vacation shall be made unless written notice of the petition is served by certified mail upon the commissioner of natural resources by the City of Edina thirty days before any Council action. • Attach a copy of a scaled drawing showing in full detail the area proposed to be vacated. • Include the vacation fee of $450.00 with your application. THE MINNESOTA DATA PRACTICES ACT requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Private data is available to you, but not to the public. We are requesting this data to determine your eligibility for a license from the City of Edina. Providing the data may disclose Information that could cause your application to be denied. You are not legally required to provide the data, however, refusing to supply the data may cause your license to not be processed. Under MS 270.72, the City of Edina is required to provide the Minnesota Department of Revenue your MN Tax ID Number and Social Security Number. The Department of Revenue may supply information to the Internal Revenue Service. In addition, this data can be shared by Edina City Staff, Department of Public Safety, Hennepin County Auditor, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, Hennepin County Warrant Office, Ramsey County Warrant Office and other persons or entities deemed necessary for verification of information submitted in the application. Your signature on this application indicates you understand these rights. I request that my residence address and telephone number be considered private data. My alternative address and telephone number are as follows: Address Telephone Number Date Initiated C rid 2 I Signatur 1 09/25/2017 Account No. 1260.4341 Suite #200 1970 Northwestern Ave. Stillwater, MN 55082 Phone 651.275.8969 dantb C5511 retry net Property Legal Description: (LEGAL DESCRIPTION PER CERTIFICATE OF TITLE NO. 1460901) Lots 11, except that part thereof lying Southeasterly of a line drawn from the most Northerly corner of Lot 10 to a point on the West line of Lot 11 distance 30 feet North of the Southwest corner thereof, Block 1, Holand's 1st Addition. (LEGAL DESCRIPTION PER WARRANTY DEED DOC. NO. 8419126) That part of Lot 3, Block 3, SCHEY'S PARK VIEW THIRD ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin county, Minnesota, lying easterly of a line described as commencing at the southeast corner of said Lot 3: thence South 78 degrees 49 minutes 21 seconds West, assumed bearing, along the southerly line of said Lot 3, a distance of 130.00 feet to the point of beginning of said line to be described; thence North 15 degrees 29 minutes 04 seconds West a distance of 46.83 feet; thence North 0 degrees 03 minutes 20 seconds West a distance of 75.00 feet to the north line of said Lot 3, and line there terminating. (LEGAL DESCRIPTION PER WARRANTY DEED DOC. NO. 7839817) That part of Lot 4, block 3, Shey's Park View Third Addition, lying northeasterly of a line drawn southeasterly from a point on the north line of said Lot 4 distant 130.00 feet southwesterly from the northeast corner of said Lot 4 to a point on the south line of said Lot 4 distant 50.00 feet westerly from the southeast corner of said Lot 4. Proposed Vacation Description: That particular drainage and utility easements as dedicated on the plat of Holand's 1st Addition being the west 5.00 feet of the following described property, lying southerly of the north 5.00 feet thereof: Lots 11, except that part thereof lying southeasterly of a line drawn from the most northerly corner of lot 10 to a point on the west line of lot 11 distance 30 feet north of the southwest corner thereof, block 1, Holand's 1st Addition. And, that particular drainage and utility easement as dedicated on the plat of Schey's Park View Third Addition being the east 5.00 feet Lot 3, Block 3, Schey's Park View Third Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. And, that particular drainage and utility easement as dedicated on the plat of Schey's Park View Third Addition being the east 5.00 feet Lot 4, Block 3, Schey's Park View Third Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC. Exhibit B Description of Utility and Drainage Easement Vacation SHEET 2 OF 2 PROJ. NO. STR21082 I- LOT / E LINE I LOT 3 scHeys PARR VIEW €41 h -TWO ADON-.% 3 5' Ull-ITY I \ ' EASEMENT PER - SE COR. LOT 4 -c-E. LINE I, 1 LOT 4 LOT II 30.00 0) In 1-. to MOST—. \ N'LY COR. LOT 10 / (L=54.99 PLAT)i / -- / 1=55.12 MEAS."-- R=50.00 4=83'09.47"MEAS. I (d.,63100145"PLAT) '40' ••• NORTH Suite #200 1970 Northwestern Ave. Stillwater, MN 55082 Phone 651.275.8969 dan0 cssurvey .nee (;) c‘ (0A2- 0,6 gtta NO`D3'201Q175,00 (DEW) mi`^ nig .9P - NO0•02.59"E 00a 75.09 (MRAS.) 9 Ca eo N; 411 N. LINE ( LOT 4 hi Os S. LINE LOT 3 N. LINE c--sr 'SI LOT 3 --1 LINES. LOT 4 to g PROPOSED UTILITY AND DRAINAGE N.,/ EASEMENT VACTION \-5' UTILITY MD —T- OR/NAGE EASEMNT %0-•-- I dr-W. LINE Aar t/ LOT II PER NOLAND'S 151 AOON 2' PI N. LINE LOT 11--' CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC. Exhibit A Depiction of Utility and Drainage Easement Vacation SHEET 1 OF 2 PROJ. NO. STR21082 The CITY of EDINA Vacation of Easements 7300 Claredon Drive Resolution 2021-65 Public Hearing August 17, 2021 The CITY of EDINAExisting Easements www.EdinaMN.gov 2 The CITY of EDINAVacated Area City: Supports Vacated Area Private Utilities: No Issues Noted www.EdinaMN.gov 3 The CITY of EDINARecommendation Motion to close the public hearing at noon, August 30,and to continue action on the item to the September 9 City Council meeting. www.EdinaMN.gov 4 Date: August 17, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Scott Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-64: Approving Laws 2021 First Special Session Chapter 14/HF 9, Article 8, Section 5, to Impose a Sales and Use Tax Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2021-64, approving Laws 2021, First Special Session Chapter 14/HF 9, Article 8, Section 5, allowing the City to impose a Sales and Use Tax of one-half percent, if approved by voters at the Nov. 8, 2022, General Election, to pay for development of Fred Richards Park and improvements to Braemar Park. INTRODUCTION: At the request of the City Council, the Minnesota State Legislature adopted legislation earlier this year to authorize the City of Edina to conduct a referendum seeking approval from Edina voters on the imposition of a new local options sales tax to provide funding for two major community improvement projects: the Fred Richards Park Master Plan and the Braemar Park Master Plan. In order for the state legislative action to become law, it is required for the City Council to officially approve the law that was passed by the State Legislature. The Council can express its approval by adopting Resolution 2021- 64, which is an act of the City Council approving laws of the first special session Chapter 14/House File 9, Article 8, Section 5 to impose a sales and use tax. While adopting Resolution 2021-64 does not impose the tax unilaterally, its adoption does allow Edina residents the opportunity to impose the tax by an affirmative vote in the 2022 General Election on Nov. 8, 2022. If adopted by the City Council, staff will forward the executed resolution to the Secretary of State’s Office and take whatever other filing actions are necessary to fulfill the Council’s intention to approve and accept this legislation. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-64: Approving Laws 2021 to Impose a Sales and Use Tax RESOLUTION NO. 2021-64 APPROVING LAWS 2021, FIRST SPECIAL SESSION, CHAPTER 14/HF 9, ARTICLE 8, SECTION 5, ALLOWING THE CITY OF EDINA TO IMPOSE A SALES AND USE TAX OF ONE-HALF OF ONE PERCENT, IF APPROVED BY VOTERS AT THE NOVEMBER 8, 2022, GENERAL ELECTION, TO PAY FOR DEVELOPMENT OF FRED RICHARDS PARK AS IDENTIFIED IN THE FRED RICHARDS PARK MASTER PLAN, AND FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO BRAEMAR PARK AS IDENTIFIED IN THE BRAEMAR PARK MASTER PLAN WHEREAS, Laws 2021, First Special Session, Chapter 14/HF 9, Article 8, Section 5, allows the City of Edina to impose a Sales and Use Tax of one-half of one percent, if approved by voters at the November 8, 2022, General Election, to pay for development of Fred Richards Park as identified in the Fred Richards Park Master Plan, for improvements to Braemar Park as identified in the Braemar Park Master Plan; and WHEREAS, the First Special Session Law is effective upon approval by a majority vote of the City Council and filing a Certificate of Approval with the Minnesota Secretary of State, all in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.021, subdivision 2 and 3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Edina that: 1. The First Special Session Law is hereby approved by in all aspects. 2. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to file with the Minnesota Secretary of State, a certified copy of this resolution and the appropriate certificate in the form prescribed by the Minnesota State Attorney General. 3. City of Edina staff are authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to implement the First Special Session Law and bring before this City Council further proceedings as necessary to implement the First Special Session Law. Dated: August 17, 2021 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 17, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _______ day of ___________________, 2021. City Clerk Date: August 17, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Stephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-60: Establishing the 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2021-60 establishing the 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District and direct staff to work with the Financial Advisor and Legal Counsel to draft a Term Sheet and Redevelopment Agreement. INTRODUCTION: A public hearing was held August 4, 2021 with comments accepted through noon on August 9, 2021 on creating a Housing TIF District at 4040 West 70th Street to help facilitate the development of 118 units of age restricted affordable housing. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Establishing the 4040 West 70th Street TIF District, Aug. 4 Resolution No. 2021-60: Establishing the 4040 West 70th Street TIF District Southdale TIF Plan TIF District Map Better Together Public Hearing Comment Report 8-9-21 Noon Staff Presentation Staff Presentation 1 August 4, 2021 Mayor and City Council Members Stephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution 2021-60 Establishing 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District Information / Background: On December 17, 2019 the City Council approved Resolution 2019-116 following a Public Hearing on modifying the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Plan to allow Southdale 2 TIF Pooled funds to be used for the acquisition of 4040 W. 70th Street acquisition (“Site”). Subsequently the HRA approved a $3,650,000 loan to the Edina Housing Foundation (“Foundation”) using Southdale 2 TIF pooled funds as the source. On June 24, 2021 the HRA adopted Resolution No. 2021-05 to support senior affordable housing at the Site through the use of Tax Increment Financing, contingent upon City Council adoption of a supporting Resolution following the August 4, 2021 Public Hearing. After executing a loan agreement with the HRA in May 2020, the Foundation acquired the Site and selected an affordable housing developer through a competitive Request for Qualifications process. The Foundation selected Lupe Development Partners together with Ecumen (“Developer”) to develop 118-units of 100% affordable, age-restricted housing. The Foundation and Developer entered into a Ground Lease to keep the development affordable for 99-years. The Planning Commission confirmed that the proposed development complies with the 2040 Comprehesive Plan at their July 28, 2021 meeting. Tax Increment Financing Plan Two aspects of Tax Increment Financing are being requested for this development: Southdale 2 TIF pooled funds for the acquisition of the site and TIF as a funding source for the development of the 118 units of affordable housing. STAFF REPORT Page 2 There are two components to the Southdale 2 TIF pooled funds: 1) “Regular” housing pooled funds and 2) Special Legislation pooled funds. “Regular” housing pooled funds were used to acquire the Site because at the time we did not know the specifics of the final development. At the time, December 2019, the intent was to swap out the use “regular” pooled funds with the “Special Legislation” pooled funds once a developer was selected and a development plans received preliminary site plan approval. To use the “Special Legislation” pooled funds, a new Housing District must be created and the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing Plan modified. 1. “Regular” Housing Pooled Funds: Initially for the acquisition of 4040 W. 70th until an approved development plan. The HRA may use funds under the Southdale 2 TIF pooling authorities as direct expenditures or grants/loans for acquisition, site preparation, construction, rehabilitation or public improvements directly related to qualifying affordable housing projects. 2. Special Legislation Pooled Funds: To now use for 4040 W. 70th Street as the plan received preliminary approval. In 2014, the City secured special legislation to create new Housing TIF Districts and pool some of the Southdale 2 incremental property taxes to support their creation of new affordable housing in Edina. The legislation was later amended in 2017 and 2019 to extend the time period to create new TIF Districts, which currently sunsets at the end of 2021. In order to use the Southdale TIF 2 Special Legislation Funds, a new Special Legislation Housing TIF District must be created. The Tables below show the transfer of funds from Regular Pooled Funds to Special Legislative Pooled funds. Special Legislation Estimated Balance Requests Repayments Starting Pooling Capacity $7,485,831 4100 Edina ($2,900,000) $500,000 Amundson Flats ($1,300,000) $600,000 4040 W. 70th Street ($3,650,000) Ending Balance $735,831 Regular Pooled Funds Estimated Balance Requests Repayment Starting Pooling Capacity $7,832,295 66 West ($275,000) 7008 Sandell ($350,000) 4040 W. 70th Street ($3,650,000) $3,650,000 Metro HRA ($2,000,000) STAFF REPORT Page 3 Future Funding Capacity $5,207,295 Ehlers Associates, the City’s public finance advisor has prepared a Tax Increment Financing Plan to establish the parameters of the new TIF District. The Plans have been reviewed by the City’s special counsel for redevelopment matters, Dorsey & Whitney, to ensure compliance with State Law. The draft Tax Increment Financing Plan must establish a budget for the TIF District. Ehlers’ analysis estimates that incremental taxes from the new TIF District, if carried to its maximum term, can provide additional financing for approximately $1,808,000 in qualifying affordable housing costs. Public Notice Notices regarding these Plans have been distributed to affected taxing agencies, including the Edina School District, and Hennepin County in accordance with the process identified in State Law. As of the writing of this staff report, no concerns have been expressed regarding the creation of the 4040 West 70th Street TIF District. Redevelopment Agreement The Developer is actively applying for financing for the development of this housing project. Financing should be in place in late 2022. Once all financing is secured, staff will present a Term Sheet followed by a Redevelopment Agreement for approval. A Term Sheet and Loan Agreement for the acquisition of the Site were previously approved in 2019 prior to site acquisition by the Foundation. Compliance with Approved City Plans The developer requests financial support from the Edina HRA through the use of tax increment financing (TIF). This request is aligned with the mission and purpose of the Edina HRA and is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan to provide an additional 1,804 new affordable units by 2040. 1. Greater Southdale District Plan The Greater Southdale District Plan supports the development of affordable age-restricted housing at 4040 W. 70th Street. In addition to the site being zoned appropriately, the plan states the following: The Greater Southdale District has an important role to play in accommodating expected housing growth. Already an area characterized by high density residential and mixed-use development, it is guided for additional infill development of a similar or higher intensity. The presence of jobs, retail STAFF REPORT Page 4 and services, transit, and public amenities means this area contains the elements for a complete community, which can leverage these advantages for a convenient and accessible lifestyle for a range of household types. Affordable housing is a necessary component of the housing mix. This is especially true given the demographic future of Greater Southdale. The expected growth in the senior population and the desire to attract young workers and families both point to the need to have more affordable housing, including options for those that might choose to move here from other parts of the community. (pg 85) 2. Advancing Housing Priorities in Edina (Housing Strategy Task Force Report) The Housing Strategy Task Force Reports supports the development of affordable senior housing. Two of the three key principles state: • Housing Choice: Support the development of a wide range of housing options to meet the diverse needs and preferences for the existing and future Edina community. • Affordability: Encourage the development and maintenance of diverse housing options affordable to residents at a range of incomes and life stages. The Report states a priority should be to develop 199 new units of affordable rental housing for seniors (pg. 3). This is supported by the MaxField Study that was completed in 2020 that states there is a demand for 553 new units of independent congregate living for seniors and 576 new units of affordable housing for active seniors. Staff recommends that the City Council approve Resolution No. 2021-60. CITY OF EDINA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA Councilmember ______________________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 2021-60 ESTABLISHING THE 4040 WEST 70th STREET TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The Board of Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA") have heretofore established the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area (the "Project Area") and adopted a Redevelopment Plan therefore. It has been proposed by the HRA and the City that the City approve and the HRA adopt a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area (the "Redevelopment Plan Modification") and a Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF Plan") for the establishment of the 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District (the "TIF District") therein (the Redevelopment Plan Modification and the TIF Plan are referred to collectively herein as the "Plans"); all pursuant to and in conformity with applicable law, including Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 and Sections 469.174 to 469.1794, all inclusive, as amended, (the "Act") and Minnesota Session Laws 2014, Chapter 308, Article 6, Section 8, as amended by Minnesota Session Laws 2017, First Special Session Chapter 1, Article 6, Sections 11 and 16, and Minnesota Session Laws 2019, First Special Session Chapter 6, Article 7, Section 3 (the "Special TIF Housing Legislation") all as reflected in the Plans, and presented for the Council's consideration. 1.02. The HRA and City have investigated the facts relating to the Plans and have caused the Plans to be prepared. 1.03. The HRA and City will have performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the establishment of the TIF District and the adoption and approval of the proposed Plans, including, but not limited to, notification of Hennepin County and Independent School District No. 273 having taxing jurisdiction over the property within the TIF District, a review of and written comment on the Plans by the City Planning Commission, approval of the Plans by the HRA on July 29, 2021, and the holding of a public hearing upon published notice as required by law. 1.04. Certain written reports (the ''Reports") relating to the Plans and to the activities contemplated therein have heretofore been prepared by staff and consultants and submitted to the Council and/or made a part of the City files and proceedings on the Plans. The Reports include data, information and/or substantiation constituting or relating to the basis for the other findings and determinations made in this resolution. The Council hereby confirms, ratifies and adopts the Reports, which are hereby incorporated into and made as fully a part of this resolution to the same extent as if set forth in full herein. Resolution 2021-60 Page 2 1.05. The City is not modifying the boundaries of the Project Area, but is, however, modifying the Redevelopment Plan to include activities related to the TIF District. Section 2. Findings for the Adoption and Approval of the Redevelopment Plan Modification. 2.01. The Council approves the Redevelopment Plan Modification, and specifically finds that: (a) the land within the Project Area would not be available for redevelopment without the financial aid to be sought under this Redevelopment Plan; (b) the Redevelopment Plan, as modified, will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Project Area by private enterprise; and (c) that the Redevelopment Plan, as modified, conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. Section 3. Findings for the Establishment of the TIF District. 3.01. The Council hereby finds that the TIF District is in the public interest and is a "housing district" under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. 11 of the Act and the Special TIF Housing Legislation. 3.02 The Council further finds that the proposed development would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future, that the TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the City as a whole; and that the TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the redevelopment or development of the TIF District by private enterprise. 3.03. The Council further finds, declares and determines that the City made the above findings stated in this Section and has set forth the reasons and supporting facts for each determination in writing, attached hereto as Exhibit A. 3.04. The HRA elects to calculate fiscal disparities for the TIF District in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subd. 3, clause b, which means the fiscal disparities contribution would be taken from inside the TIF District. Section 4. Public Purpose. 4.01. The adoption of the Plans conforms in all respects to the requirements of the Act and will help fulfill a need to develop an area of the City which is already built up, to provide housing opportunities, to improve the tax base and to improve the general economy of the State and thereby serves a public purpose. For the reasons described in Exhibit A, the City believes these benefits directly derive from the tax increment assistance provided under the TIF Plan. A private developer will receive only the assistance needed to make the development financially feasible. As such, any private benefits received by a property owner are incidental and do not outweigh the primary public benefits. Section 5. Approval and Adoption of the Plans. 5.01. The Plans, as presented to the Council on this date, including without limitation the findings and statements of objectives contained therein, are hereby approved, ratified, established, and adopted and shall be placed on file in the office of the HRA Executive Director. 5.02. The staff of the City, the City's advisors and legal counsel are authorized and directed to proceed with the implementation of the Plans and to negotiate, draft, prepare and present to this Council for its consideration all further plans, resolutions, documents and contracts necessary for this purpose. Resolution 2021-60 Page 3 5.03 The Auditor of Hennepin County is requested to certify the original net tax capacity of the TIF District, as described in the Plans, and to certify in each year thereafter the amount by which the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased; and the HRA is authorized and directed to forthwith transmit this request to the County Auditor in such form and content as the Auditor may specify, together with a list of all properties within the TIF District, for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding the adoption of this resolution. 5.04. The HRA Executive Director is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the Plans with the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Revenue and the Office of the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.175, Subd. 4a. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council member ______________________, and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: _________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ and the following voted against the same: _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ Dated: August 17, 2021 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor (Seal) Resolution 2021-60 Page 4 EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2021-60 The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District, as required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 are as follows: 1. Finding that the 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District is a housing district as defined in M.S., Section 469.174, Subdivision 11 and the Special TIF Housing Legislation. 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District consists of one (1) parcel within the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. The development will consist of the redevelopment of the property to construct 118-units of senior affordable housing in the City, all or a portion of which will receive tax increment assistance and will meet income restrictions described in M.S. 469.1761. At least 20 percent of the units receiving assistance will have incomes at or below 60 percent of area median income. 2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future. This finding is supported by the fact that the development proposed in this plan is a housing district that meets the City's objectives for redevelopment and is intended for occupancy by low and moderate-income persons. Due to the high costs of land acquisition and building costs of new housing in the City, this project is feasible only through assistance, in part, from tax increment financing. The developer has provided the city its estimated project budget and financing projections. At least 85% of the proposed housing units are intended to be both rent and income restricted at levels designated for low and moderate incomes. The affordable rental revenues alone are insufficient to provide a sufficient rate of return, pay operating expenses, and service the debt necessary to make the project economically feasible. City staff and the City’s advisors have reviewed the information and determined the project demonstrates the need for tax increment assistance. The necessity of public assistance is true for most affordable housing developments in Minnesota. The affordable project also requires public assistance beyond tax increment. The developer has applied for an allocation of tax-exempt bonding authority and federal low-income housing tax credits from the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA). The City and HRA’s assistance is necessary in order to leverage the potential federal subsidy necessary to finance the redevelopment. 3. Finding that the TIF Plan for the 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole. The Planning Commission reviewed the TIF Plan and approved Resolution B-21-22 on July 28, 2021 to affirm that the TIF Plan conforms to the general development plan of the City. 4. Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area by private enterprise. Resolution 2021-60 Page 5 Through the implementation of the TIF Plan, the City will provide an impetus for residential development, which is desirable and necessary for meeting the housing needs of an increasing population, people with a variety on incomes needing housing alternatives that would otherwise not be available, and an increased need for life-cycle housing within the City. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of August 17, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of________________________, 2021. _______________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Adoption Date: August 17, 2021 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota MODIFICATION TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area & Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Plan Establishment of 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District (a housing district) BUILDING COMMUNITIES. IT’S WHAT WE DO. Prepared by: Ehlers 3060 Centre Pointe Drive Roseville, Minnesota 55113 TABLE OF CONTENTS Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area 1 FOREWORD 1 MUNICIPAL ACTION TAKEN 1 Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District 4 FOREWORD 4 STATUTORY AUTHORITY 4 STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES 4 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OVERVIEW 5 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY IN THE DISTRICT AND PROPERTY TO BE ACQUIRED 5 DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION 6 DURATION & FIRST YEAR OF DISTRICT’S TAX INCREMENT 6 ORIGINAL TAX CAPACITY, TAX RATE & ESTIMATED CAPTURED NET TAX CAPACITY VALUE/INCREMENT & NOTIFICATION OF PRIOR PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS 6 SOURCES OF REVENUE/BONDS TO BE ISSUED 8 USES OF FUNDS 8 FISCAL DISPARITIES ELECTION 9 ESTIMATED IMPACT ON OTHER TAXING JURISDICTIONS 9 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION 12 DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION 12 Appendix A: Map of Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and the TIF District 13 Appendix B: Estimated Cash Flow for the District 14 Appendix C: Findings Including But/For Qualifications 15 Appendix D: Project Description 17 Appendix E: Special TIF Housing Legislation 18 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District 1 Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area FOREWORD The following text represents a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. This modification represents a continuation of the goals and objectives previously set forth in the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. Generally, the substantive changes include the establishment of the 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District. MUNICIPAL ACTION TAKEN Based upon the statutory authority described in the Redevelopment Plan, the public purpose findings by the City Council and for the purpose of fulfilling the City’s development objects as set forth in the Redevelopment Plan, the City Council has created, established and designated the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan pursuant to and in accordance with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.001 to 469.047. The original and amended Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan documents designated the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan as a redevelopment project and also a tax increment financing plan for tax increment districts created prior to 1988. The Centennial Lakes Tax Increment Financing District was created in 1988 pursuant to Tax Increment Financing Plan 88-1, which was subsequently renamed the Centennial Lakes Tax Increment District and referred to by Hennepin County as District #1203 and #1249. For purposes of clarification, this modification will refer to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.002. The following municipal action has been taken with regard to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan: September 29, 1977: The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina (the “HRA”) approved the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan. October 5, 1981: The Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan was amended to identify project costs and bonded indebtedness incurred to finance those costs. May 6, 1985: The HRA and the City approved an amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan which establishes an interest reduction program and enlarges the project area to include the “1985 Project Area.” Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District 2 August 19, 1985: The HRA and the City approved the First Amendment to the 1985 Amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan to enlarge the 1985 Project Area and authorize the issuance of additional bonds to acquire land within the enlarged 1985 Project Area. 1987: The HRA and City approved the 1987 Amendments to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan to enlarge the project area to include the 1987 Project Area. 1988: The HRA and City approved the 1988 Amendments to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan to provide an Interest Reduction Program in the amount of $2,500,000 to assist in the financing and construction of housing units and authorize the HRA and City to incur additional bonded indebtedness. February 21, 2012: The HRA and City expand the Southeast Edina Project Area. April 17, 2012: The HRA and City establish the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District. February 18, 2014: The HRA and City establish the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District. March 2, 2016: The HRA and City establish the Grandview 2 Tax Increment Financing District. April 5, 2016: The HRA and City modify the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District and establish the 66 West Tax Increment Financing District. June 20, 2017: The HRA and City establish the 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District. October 16, 2018: The HRA and City establish the 44th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District. November 20, 2018: The HRA and City modify the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District to increase the TIF Budget and enable special legislative pooling authority for affordable housing. November 20, 2018: The HRA and City also establish the West 76th Street Tax Increment Financing District. March 19, 2019: The HRA and City establish the 72nd and France Tax Increment Financing District. December 17, 2019: The HRA and City modify the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District to designate property to be acquired and establish the Amundson Avenue Tax Increment Financing District. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District 3 (As Modified August 4, 2021) August 4, 2021: The HRA and City establish the 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District. For further information, a review of the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area is recommended. It is available from the HRA Executive Director at the City of Edina. Other relevant information is contained in the Tax Increment Financing Plans for the Tax Increment Financing Districts located within the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District 4 Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District FOREWORD The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA"), the City of Edina (the "City"), staff and consultants have prepared the following information to establish the 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District (the "District"), a special housing tax increment financing district located in Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. STATUTORY AUTHORITY Within the City, there exist areas where public involvement is necessary to cause development or redevelopment to occur. To this end, the HRA and City have certain statutory powers pursuant to Minnesota Statutes ("M.S."), Sections 469.001 - 469.047, inclusive, as amended (the “HRA Act”), M.S., Sections 469.174 to 469.1794, inclusive, as amended (the "Tax Increment Financing Act" or "TIF Act"), and Minnesota Session Laws 2014, Chapter 308, Article 6, Section 8, inclusive, as amended (the “Special TIF Housing Legislation”), to assist in financing public costs related to this project. This section contains the Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF Plan") for the District. Other relevant information is contained in the Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, originally adopted September 29, 1977, and modified from time to time. STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES The District currently consists of one (1) parcel of land and adjacent roads and internal rights-of-way. The District is being created to facilitate the development of a three-to-four story, 118-unit senior affordable housing project. Please see Appendix D for further District information. The HRA anticipates entering into an agreement with Cornelia View, LLC, a partnership between Lupe Development Partners and Ecumen, as the developer of the housing. Development is anticipated to begin as early as 2022. This TIF Plan is expected to achieve many of the objectives outlined in the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. The activities contemplated in the Modification to the Development Program and the TIF Plan do not preclude the undertaking of other qualified development or redevelopment activities. These activities are anticipated to occur over the life of Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and the District. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District 5 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OVERVIEW Pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan and authorizing state statutes, the HRA or City is authorized to undertake the following activities in the District: 1. Property to be Acquired - Selected property located within the District, to include property owned by the Edina Housing Foundation or any remaining property located within the District, may be acquired by the HRA or City and is further described in this TIF Plan. 2. Relocation - Relocation services, to the extent required by law, are available pursuant to M.S., Chapter 117 and other relevant state and federal laws. 3. Upon approval of a developer's plan relating to the project and completion of the necessary legal requirements, the HRA or City may sell to a developer selected properties that it may acquire within the District or may lease land or facilities to a developer. 4. The HRA or City may perform or provide for some or all necessary acquisition, construction, relocation, demolition, and required utilities and public street work within the District. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY IN THE DISTRICT AND PROPERTY TO BE ACQUIRED The District encompasses all property and adjacent roads rights-of-way and abutting roadways identified by the parcels listed below. Parcel number Address Owner 30-028-24-44-0004 4040 70th St W Edina Housing Foundation Please see the map in Appendix A for further information on District location. The Edina Housing Foundation currently owns the parcel of the property to be included in the District. If deemed necessary, the HRA or City may acquire any parcel within the District including interior and adjacent street rights of way. Any properties identified for acquisition will be acquired by the HRA or City only in order to accomplish one or more of the following: storm sewer improvements; provide land for needed public streets, utilities and facilities; carry out land acquisition, site improvements, clearance and/or development to accomplish the uses and objectives set forth in this TIF Plan. The HRA or City may acquire property by gift, dedication, condemnation or direct purchase from willing sellers in order to achieve the objectives. Such acquisitions will be undertaken only when there is assurance of funding to finance the acquisition and related costs. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District 6 DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION The HRA and City, in determining the need to create a tax increment financing district in accordance with the TIF Act find that the District, to be established, is a housing district pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 11; M.S., Section 469.1761; and the Special TIF Housing Legislation. In meeting the statutory criteria of the TIF Act, the HRA and City rely on the following facts and findings: $ The District consists of one (1) parcel $ The development will consist of one building consisting of 118-units of multi-family rental housing $ At least 20% of the units will be occupied by individuals or households with incomes at 60% or less of area median income $ No more that 20 percent of the square footage of the building that is receiving assistance from tax increment consists of commercial, retail or other non- residential uses. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 7, the District does not contain any parcel or part of a parcel that qualified under the provisions of M.S., Sections 273.111, 273.112, or 273.114 or Chapter 473H for taxes payable in any of the five calendar years before the filing of the request for certification of the District. DURATION & FIRST YEAR OF DISTRICT’S TAX INCREMENT Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 1, and Section 469.176, Subd. 1, the duration and first year of tax increment of the District must be indicated within the TIF Plan. Pursuant to the Special TIF Housing Legislation, the duration of the District will be 20 years after receipt of the first increment by the HRA or City (a total of 21 years of tax increment). The HRA or City elects to receive the first tax increment in 2025, which is no later than four years following the year of approval of the District. Thus, it is estimated that the District, including any modifications of the TIF Plan for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate after 2045, or when the TIF Plan is satisfied. The HRA or City reserves the right to decertify the District prior to the legally required date. ORIGINAL TAX CAPACITY, TAX RATE & ESTIMATED CAPTURED NET TAX CAPACITY VALUE/INCREMENT & NOTIFICATION OF PRIOR PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 7 and M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, the Original Net Tax Capacity (ONTC) as certified for the District will be based on the market values placed on the property by the assessor in 2021 for taxes payable 2022. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subds. 1 and 2, the County Auditor shall certify in each year (beginning in the payment year 2025) the amount by which the original value has increased or decreased as a result of: Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District 7 1. Change in tax exempt status of property; 2. Reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the district; 3. Change due to adjustments, negotiated or court-ordered abatements; 4. Change in the use of the property and classification; 5. Change in state law governing class rates; or 6. Change in previously issued building permits. In any year in which the current Net Tax Capacity (NTC) value of the District declines below the ONTC, no value will be captured and no tax increment will be payable to the HRA or City. The Original Local Tax Rate for the District will be the local tax rate for taxes payable 2022, assuming the request for certification is made as planned prior to June 30, 2022. The ONTC and the Original Local Tax Rate for the District appear in the table below. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174 Subd. 4 and M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, 2, and 4, the estimated Captured Net Tax Capacity (CTC) of the District, within Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, upon completion of the project within the District, will annually approximate tax increment revenues as shown in the table below. The HRA and City request 100 percent of the available increase in tax capacity for repayment of its obligations and current expenditures, beginning in the tax year payable 2025. The Project Tax Capacity (PTC) listed is an estimate of values when the projects within the District are completed. Estimated Project Tax Capacity (PTC) 215,124 Less: Estimated Original Net Tax Capacity (ONTC) 26,258 Less: Fiscal Disparities 0 Estimated Captured Tax Capacity (CTC)188,866 Estimated Original Local Tax Rate 107.4560%Pay 2021 Estimated Annual Tax Increment (CTC x Rate)$202,948 Percent Retainted by the HRA 100% Project Tax Capacity Note: Estimated PTC includes a 2.5% inflation factor for the duration of the District and is the estimated tax capacity of the District in year 21. The tax capacity of the District in year one is estimated to be $131,284. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District 8 Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 4, the HRA shall, after a due and diligent search, accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor or its notice of the District enlargement pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 4, with a listing of all properties within the District or area of enlargement for which building permits have been issued during the eighteen (18) months immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan by the municipality pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 3. The County Auditor shall increase the ONTC of the District by the net tax capacity of improvements for which a building permit was issued. The City is reviewing the area to be included in the District to determine if any building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan. SOURCES OF REVENUE/BONDS TO BE ISSUED The total estimated tax increment revenues for the District are shown in the table below: SOURCES Tax Increment 3,230,618$ Interest 161,531 TOTAL 3,392,149$ The costs outlined in the Uses of Funds will be financed primarily through the annual collection of tax increments. The HRA or City reserves the right to incur bonds or other indebtedness to achieve the objectives of the TIF Plan. As presently proposed, the projects within the District will be financed by a pay-as-you-go note and/or interfund loans to reimburse the Developer or HRA for the funding of qualified affodable housing costs. Any refunding amounts will be deemed a budgeted cost without a formal TIF Plan Modification. This provision does not obligate the HRA or City to incur debt. The HRA or City will issue bonds or incur other debt only upon the determination that such action is in the best interest of the City. The HRA or City may issue bonds (as defined in the TIF Act) secured in whole or in part with tax increments from the District in a maximum amount of $3,392,149. Such bonds may be in the form of pay-as-you-go notes, revenue bonds or notes, general obligation bonds, or interfund loans. This estimate of total bonded indebtedness is a cumulative statement of authority under this TIF Plan as of the date of approval. USES OF FUNDS Currently under consideration for the District is a proposal to help facilitate redevelopment of the property into 118-units of senior affordable housing. The HRA and City have determined that it will be necessary to provide assistance to the project(s) for certain District costs, as described. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District 9 The HRA has studied the feasibility of the development or redevelopment of property in and around the District. To facilitate the establishment and redevelopment of the District, this TIF Plan authorizes the use of tax increment financing to pay for the cost of certain eligible expenses. The estimate of public costs and uses of funds associated with the District is outlined in the following table. These estimates establish the maximum amount permitted to be expended, but the HRA and City is not obligated to expend the full amount. USES Affordable Housing 3,230,618 Administrative Costs (up to 10%)161,531 PROJECT COSTS TOTAL 3,392,149$ Interest - PROJECT AND INTEREST COSTS TOTAL 3,392,149$ The total project cost, including financing costs (interest) listed in the table above does not exceed the total projected tax increments for the District as shown in the Sources of Revenue section. Estimated costs associated with the District are subject to change among categories without a modification to this TIF Plan. The cost of all activities to be considered for tax increment financing will not exceed, without formal modification, the budget above pursuant to the applicable statutory requirements. Pursuant to the TIF Act, the HRA may expend funds for qualified housing activities outside of the District boundaries. FISCAL DISPARITIES ELECTION Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 3, the HRA or City may elect one of two methods to calculate any fiscal disparities contribution of commercial-industrial net tax capacity from the District. The HRA will choose to calculate fiscal disparities by clause b (inside the District). ESTIMATED IMPACT ON OTHER TAXING JURISDICTIONS The estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions assumes that the redevelopment contemplated by the TIF Plan would occur without the creation of the District. However, the HRA and City has determined that such redevelopment would not occur "but for" tax increment financing and that, therefore, the fiscal impact on other taxing jurisdictions is $0. The estimated fiscal impact of the District would be as follows if the "but for" test was not met: Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District 10 Entity 2020/Pay 2021 Total Net Tax Capacity Estimated Captured Tax Capacity (CTC) upon completion Percent of CTC to Entity Total Hennepin County 2,080,642,179 188,866 0.0091% City of Edina 141,273,381 188,866 0.1337% ISD 273 (Edina)115,791,268 188,866 0.1631% Impact on Tax Base if "But/For" Not Met Entity Pay 2021 Extension Rate Percent of Total Rate CTC Potential Annual Taxes Hennepin County 38.2100% 35.56% 188,866 $ 72,166 City of Edina 28.9390% 26.93% 188,866 54,656 ISD 273 (Edina)31.4740% 29.29% 188,866 59,444 Other 8.8330% 8.22% 188,866 16,683 107.4560% 100.00% $ 202,948 Impact on Tax Rates if "But/For" Not Met The estimates listed above display the estimated CTC when all construction is completed at the end of the District. The tax rate used for calculations is the Pay 2021 rate as obtained from Hennepin County. The total net capacity for the entities listed above are based on Pay 2021 figures provided by Hennepin County. The District will be certified under the Pay 2022 rates, which were unavailable at the time this TIF Plan was prepared. Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175 Subd. 2(b): (1) Estimate of total tax increment. It is estimated that the total amount of tax increment from property within the District that will be generated over the life of the District is $3,230,618; (2) Probable impact of the District on city provided services and ability to issue debt. An impact of the District on police protection is expected. With any addition of new residents or businesses, police calls for service will be increased. New developments add an increase in traffic and additional overall demands to the call load. However, the City does not expect that the proposed development, in and of itself, will necessitate new capital investment in vehicles or facilities, nor staffing levels. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District 11 The probable impact of the District on fire protection is not expected to be significant. Typically new buildings generate few calls, if any, and are of superior construction and compliant with the latest building codes. The anticipated tenants will be seniors and are more likely to bring an increase in EMS calls to the site, but the City does not expect that the proposed development, in and of itself, will necessitate additional staffing or new capital investment in vehicles or facilities. The impact of the District on public infrastructure is expected to be minimal. The development will bring new vehicle traffic to the area but is not expected to require new public infrastructure. The current infrastructure for sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water will also be able to handle the additional volume generated from the proposed development. Based on the development plans, there are no additional costs associated with street maintenance, sweeping, plowing, lighting and sidewalks. The development in the District is expected to contribute an estimated $283,290 in sanitary sewer (SAC) and water (WAC) connection fees. It is not anticipated that there will be any general obligation debt issued in relation to this District, therefore it is not expected that there will be any impact on the City's ability to issue future debt or on the City's debt limit. (3) Estimated amount of tax increment attributable to school district levies. It is estimated that the amount of tax increments over the life of the District that would be attributable to school district levies, assuming the school district's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same, is $946,252. The amount is calculated by multiplying the total estimated increment of $3,230,618 by the percent of the proportionate share of the total tax rate of 29.29%; (4) Estimated amount of tax increment attributable to county levies. It is estimated that the amount of tax increments over the life of the District that would be attributable to county levies, assuming the county's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same, is $1,148,767. The amount is calculated by multiplying the total estimated increment of $3,230,618 by the percent of the proportionate share of the total tax rate of 35.56%; (5) Additional information requested by the county or school district. The City is not aware of any standard questions in a county or school district written policy regarding tax increment districts and impact on county or school district services. The county or school district must request additional information pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175 Subd. 2(b) within 15 days after receipt of the tax increment financing plan. At this time, no requests for additional information from the county or school district regarding the proposed development for the District have been received. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District 12 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175, Subd. 1 (a), clause 7 the TIF Plan must contain identification and description of studies and analyses used to make the determination set forth in M.S. Section 469.175, Subd. 3, clause (b)(2) and the findings are required in the resolution approving the District. In making said determination, reliance has been placed upon (1) written representation made by the developer to such effects; (2) review of the developer’s anticipated proforma and tax credit application materials; and (3) City staff awareness of the feasibility of developing the project site within the District, which is further outlined in the city council resolution approving the establishment of the TIF District and Appendix C. DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION Administration of the District will be handled by the HRA Executive Director and Affordable Housing Development Manager. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District 13 Appendix A: Map of Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and the TIF District æ ¹» æ æ æ¹»æ æ ¹º¹º ¹º ñ ñ ¹»æ æ æ ¹º ¹º æ ¹º æ æ ¹º ¹º æ æ ¹º ñ ¹» æ æ ñ æ æ æ ñ ñ ñTRACY AVEVERNO N AVEWOODDALE AVEHANSEN RD70TH ST W FRANCE AVE SVALLEYVIEWRDMINNESOT A DRGLEASONRDEdinaCommunityCenter CalvinChristianSchool GoldenYears Montessori Edina MorningsideChurch City Hall EdinaCovenant CalvaryChurch St Stephen'sEpiscopal ColonyParkBaptist St Peter's Lutheran Church & School EdinaCommunityLutheran Church SouthviewJr High NormandaleElementary ConcordSchool CorneliaSchool Southdale Library FireStation ChristPresbyerianChurch Public Works &Park Maintenance St Patrick'sCatholic Calvary Lutheran Creek ValleySchool FireStation St. Alban'sEpiscopal Valley ViewJr High EdinaHighSchool CrossviewLutheran Creek ValleyBaptist Colonial Church Chapel Hills Congregational CountrysideSchool GoodSamaritanMethodist HighlandSchool Shephard ofthe HillsLutheran PublicLibrary Our Lady ofGrace Church & School NormandaleLutheran M in nehahaCreek NineMileCreek Nin eMileCreek 4040 W 70th St Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadBLAKE RDSCHAEFER RDV ERN O N A VECAHILL RD66TH ST W YORK AVE SINTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 4 4TH S T W 50TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST W 70TH ST W 76TH ST W DEWEY HILL RD VALLEY VIEW RD VALLEY VIEW RD 78TH ST W I-494 HWY 100HWY 169HWY 169HWY 100HWY 62 HWY 62 June 2021 ±Legend 4040 W 70th St TIF Boundary Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area 0 2,000 Feet Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District 14 Appendix B: Estimated Cash Flow for the District 6/30/20214040 West 70th Street TIF DistrictCity of Edina, MN 118-unit Senior HousingASSUMPTIONS AND RATESDistrictType:HousingDistrict Name/Number: TBDCounty District #: TBDExempt Class Rate (Exempt) 0.00%First Year Construction or Inflation on Value 2023Commercial Industrial Preferred Class Rate (C/I Pref.)Existing District - Specify No. Years Remaining 21 First$150,000 1.50%Inflation Rate - Every Year:2.50%Over$150,000 2.00%Interest Rate:4.125%Commercial Industrial Class Rate (C/I) 2.00%Present Value Date:1-Aug-23Rental Housing Class Rate (Rental) 1.25%First Period Ending 1-Feb-24Affordable Rental Housing Class Rate (Aff. Rental)Tax Year District was Certified:Pay 2022First$100,000 0.75%Cashflow Assumes First Tax Increment For Development: 2025 Over$100,000 0.25%Years of Tax Increment 21 Non-Homestead Residential (Non-H Res. 1 Unit)Assumes Last Year of Tax Increment 2045 First$500,000 1.00%Fiscal Disparities Election [Outside (A), Inside (B), or NA]Inside(B)Over$500,000 1.25%Incremental or Total Fiscal DisparitiesIncrementalHomestead Residential Class Rate (Hmstd. Res.)Fiscal Disparities Contribution Ratio 33.7094% Pay 2021 First$500,000 1.00%Fiscal Disparities Metro-Wide Tax Rate 139.5040% Pay 2021 Over$500,000 1.25%Maximum/Frozen Local Tax Rate: 107.456% Pay 2021 Agricultural Non-Homestead 1.00%Current Local Tax Rate: (Use lesser of Current or Max.)107.456%Pay 2021 State-wide Tax Rate (Comm./Ind. only used for total taxes) 35.9780% Pay 2021 Market Value Tax Rate (Used for total taxes) 0.21097% Pay 2021 Building Total Percentage Tax Year PropertyCurrent Class AfterLand Market Market Of Value Used Original Original Tax Original After ConversionMap ID PID Owner Address Market ValueValueValue for District Market Value Market Value Class Tax CapacityConversion Orig. Tax Cap.30-028-24-44-0004Edina Hsg4040 70th St W3,500,000 1,000 3,501,000 100% 3,501,000 Pay 2022 C/I Pref. 69,270 Aff. Rental 26,258 13,500,000 1,000 3,501,000 3,501,000 69,270 26,258Note:1. Base values are for pay 2022 based upon review of County website on 6.11.2021.2. Located in SD # 273 and WS #1. BASE VALUE INFORMATION (Original Tax Capacity)Area/ PhaseTax RatesPrepared by Ehlers 6/30/20214040 West 70th Street TIF DistrictCity of Edina, MN 118-unit Senior HousingEstimated Taxable Total Taxable PropertyPercentage Percentage Percentage Percentage First YearMarket Value Market Value Total Market Tax Project Project Tax Completed Completed Completed Completed Full TaxesArea/PhaseNew UsePer Sq. Ft./UnitPer Sq. Ft./UnitSq. Ft./UnitsValueClassTax CapacityCapacity/Unit2023202420252026Payable1Apartments 173,729 173,729 101 17,546,610Aff. Rental 94,367 934 100% 100% 100% 100% 20251Apartments 173,729 173,729 17 2,953,390 Rental 36,917 2,172 100% 100% 100% 100% 2025TOTAL20,500,000 131,284 Note:1. Market values are based upon preliminary estimates povided by the City Assessor's Office on 6.21.2021.TotalFiscal LocalLocalFiscal State-wideMarketTax Disparities Tax PropertyDisparities PropertyValue Total Taxes PerNew Use CapacityTax CapacityCapacityTaxes Taxes Taxes Taxes Taxes Sq. Ft./UnitApartments 94,367 0 94,367 101,402 0 0 19,909 121,311 1,201.10Apartments 36,917 0 36,917 39,670 0 0 6,231 45,901 2,700.04TOTAL131,2840131,284141,0720026,139167,212Note: 1. Taxes and tax increment will vary significantly from year to year depending upon values, rates, state law, fiscal disparities and other factors which cannot be predicted.Total Property Taxes 167,212less State-wide Taxes 0less Fiscal Disp. Adj. 0less Market Value Taxes (26,139)less Base Value Taxes (28,215)Annual Gross TIF 112,857 WHAT IS EXCLUDED FROM TIF?TAX CALCULATIONSPROJECT INFORMATION (Project Tax Capacity)Prepared by Ehlers 6/30/2021Tax Increment Cashflow - Page 34040 West 70th Street TIF DistrictCity of Edina, MN 118-unit Senior HousingTAX INCREMENT CASH FLOWProject Original Fiscal Captured Local Annual Semi-Annual State Admin. Semi-Annual Semi-Annual PERIOD% ofTax Tax Disparities Tax Tax Gross Tax Gross Tax Auditorat Net Tax Present ENDING Tax PaymentOTC CapacityCapacityIncremental CapacityRate Increment Increment 0.36% 5% IncrementValueYrs.YearDate- - - - 02/01/24- - - - 08/01/24- - - - 02/01/25100% 131,284 (26,258) - 105,026 107.456% 112,857 56,429 (203) (2,811) 53,414 49,226 0.52025 08/01/25100% 131,284 (26,258) - 105,026 107.456% 112,857 56,429 (203) (2,811) 53,414 97,457 12025 02/01/26100% 134,566 (26,258) - 108,308 107.456% 116,384 58,192 (209) (2,899) 55,083 146,190 1.52026 08/01/26100% 134,566 (26,258) - 108,308 107.456% 116,384 58,192 (209) (2,899) 55,083 193,938 22026 02/01/27100% 137,930 (26,258) - 111,673 107.456% 119,999 59,999 (216) (2,989) 56,794 242,174 2.52027 08/01/27100% 137,930 (26,258) - 111,673 107.456% 119,999 59,999 (216) (2,989) 56,794 289,436 32027 02/01/28100% 141,378 (26,258) - 115,121 107.456% 123,704 61,852 (223) (3,081) 58,548 337,172 3.52028 08/01/28100% 141,378 (26,258) - 115,121 107.456% 123,704 61,852 (223) (3,081) 58,548 383,944 42028 02/01/29100% 144,913 (26,258) - 118,655 107.456% 127,502 63,751 (230) (3,176) 60,346 431,178 4.52029 08/01/29100% 144,913 (26,258) - 118,655 107.456% 127,502 63,751 (230) (3,176) 60,346 477,457 52029 02/01/30100% 148,536 (26,258) - 122,278 107.456% 131,395 65,698 (237) (3,273) 62,188 524,185 5.52030 08/01/30100% 148,536 (26,258) - 122,278 107.456% 131,395 65,698 (237) (3,273) 62,188 569,969 62030 02/01/31100% 152,249 (26,258) - 125,992 107.456% 135,386 67,693 (244) (3,372) 64,077 616,190 6.52031 08/01/31100% 152,249 (26,258) - 125,992 107.456% 135,386 67,693 (244) (3,372) 64,077 661,477 72031 02/01/32100% 156,055 (26,258) - 129,798 107.456% 139,476 69,738 (251) (3,474) 66,012 707,190 7.52032 08/01/32100% 156,055 (26,258) - 129,798 107.456% 139,476 69,738 (251) (3,474) 66,012 751,978 82032 02/01/33100% 159,957 (26,258) - 133,699 107.456% 143,668 71,834 (259) (3,579) 67,997 797,181 8.52033 08/01/33100% 159,957 (26,258) - 133,699 107.456% 143,668 71,834 (259) (3,579) 67,997 841,470 92033 02/01/34100% 163,956 (26,258) - 137,698 107.456% 147,965 73,982 (266) (3,686) 70,030 886,162 9.52034 08/01/34100% 163,956 (26,258) - 137,698 107.456% 147,965 73,982 (266) (3,686) 70,030 929,951 102034 02/01/35100% 168,054 (26,258) - 141,797 107.456% 152,369 76,185 (274) (3,796) 72,115 974,132 10.52035 08/01/35100% 168,054 (26,258) - 141,797 107.456% 152,369 76,185 (274) (3,796) 72,115 1,017,420 112035 02/01/36100% 172,256 (26,258) - 145,998 107.456% 156,884 78,442 (282) (3,908) 74,252 1,061,090 11.52036 08/01/36100% 172,256 (26,258) - 145,998 107.456% 156,884 78,442 (282) (3,908) 74,252 1,103,878 122036 02/01/37100% 176,562 (26,258) - 150,305 107.456% 161,511 80,756 (291) (4,023) 76,442 1,147,037 12.52037 08/01/37100% 176,562 (26,258) - 150,305 107.456% 161,511 80,756 (291) (4,023) 76,442 1,189,325 132037 02/01/38100% 180,976 (26,258) - 154,719 107.456% 166,255 83,127 (299) (4,141) 78,687 1,231,974 13.52038 08/01/38100% 180,976 (26,258) - 154,719 107.456% 166,255 83,127 (299) (4,141) 78,687 1,273,762 142038 02/01/39100% 185,501 (26,258) - 159,243 107.456% 171,116 85,558 (308) (4,263) 80,988 1,315,903 14.52039 08/01/39100% 185,501 (26,258) - 159,243 107.456% 171,116 85,558 (308) (4,263) 80,988 1,357,192 152039 02/01/40100% 190,138 (26,258) - 163,881 107.456% 176,100 88,050 (317) (4,387) 83,346 1,398,824 15.52040 08/01/40100% 190,138 (26,258) - 163,881 107.456% 176,100 88,050 (317) (4,387) 83,346 1,439,616 162040 02/01/41100% 194,892 (26,258) - 168,634 107.456% 181,208 90,604 (326) (4,514) 85,764 1,480,742 16.52041 08/01/41100% 194,892 (26,258) - 168,634 107.456% 181,208 90,604 (326) (4,514) 85,764 1,521,037 172041 02/01/42100% 199,764 (26,258) - 173,506 107.456% 186,443 93,222 (336) (4,644) 88,242 1,561,659 17.52042 08/01/42100% 199,764 (26,258) - 173,506 107.456% 186,443 93,222 (336) (4,644) 88,242 1,601,460 182042 02/01/43100% 204,758 (26,258) - 178,501 107.456% 191,810 95,905 (345) (4,778) 90,782 1,641,579 18.52043 08/01/43100% 204,758 (26,258) - 178,501 107.456% 191,810 95,905 (345) (4,778) 90,782 1,680,887 192043 02/01/44100% 209,877 (26,258) - 183,620 107.456% 197,310 98,655 (355) (4,915) 93,385 1,720,505 19.52044 08/01/44100% 209,877 (26,258) - 183,620 107.456% 197,310 98,655 (355) (4,915) 93,385 1,759,323 202044 02/01/45100% 215,124 (26,258) - 188,866 107.456% 202,948 101,474 (365) (5,055) 96,053 1,798,443 20.52045 08/01/45100% 215,124 (26,258) - 188,866 107.456% 202,948 101,474 (365) (5,055) 96,053 1,836,773 212045 02/01/46 Total3,242,290 (11,672) (161,531) 3,069,087 Present Value From 08/01/2023 Present Value Rate 4.125% 1,940,431 (6,986) (96,672) 1,836,773 Prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc. - Estimates Only N:\Minnsota\EDINA\Housing Economic Redevelopment\TIF\TIF Districts\4040 West 70th Street\Cash flows\Cornelia View_101 4d TIF Run 6.21.2021.xls Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District 15 Appendix C: Findings Including But/For Qualifications The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District, as required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 are as follows: 1. Finding that 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District is a housing district as defined in M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 11 and the Special TIF Housing Legislation. 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District consists of one (1) parcel within the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. The development will consist of the redevelopment of the property to construct 118-units of senior affordable housing in the City, all or a portion of which will receive tax increment assistance and will meet income restrictions described in M.S. 469.1761. At least 20 percent of the units receiving assistance will have incomes at or below 60 percent of area median income. 2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future. This finding is supported by the fact that the development proposed in this plan is a housing district that meets the City's objectives for redevelopment and is intended for occupancy by low and moderate-income persons. Due to the high costs of land acquisition and building costs of new housing in the City, this project is feasible only through assistance, in part, from tax increment financing. The developer has provided the city its estimated project budget and financing projections. At least 85% of the proposed housing units are intended to be both rent and income restricted at levels designated for low and moderate incomes. The affordable rental revenues alone are insufficient to provide a sufficient rate of return, pay operating expenses, and service the debt necessary to make the project economically feasible. City staff and the City’s advisors have reviewed the information and determined the project demonstrates the need for tax increment assistance. The necessity of public assistance is true for most affordable housing developments in Minnesota. The affordable project also requires public assistance beyond tax increment. The developer has applied for an allocation of federal low-income housing tax credits from the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA). The City and HRA’s assistance is necessary in order to leverage the potential federal subsidy necessary to finance the redevelopment. 3. Finding that the TIF Plan for 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District 16 The City of Edina Planning Commission reviewed the TIF Plan and approved Resolution 2021-__ on July 28, 2021 to provide written opinion affirming that the TIF Plan conforms to the general development plan of the City. 4. Finding that the TIF Plan for 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area by private enterprise. Through the implementation of the TIF Plan, the City will provide an impetus for residential development, which is desirable and necessary for meeting the housing needs of an increasing population, people with a variety on incomes needing housing alternatives that would otherwise not be available, and an increased need for life-cycle housing within the City. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District 17 Appendix D: Project Description The development team called Cornelia View Developers, LLC, a joint entity consisting of Ecumen and Lupe Development Partners, LLC, is proposing to sponsor the development of approximately 118 affordable housing units targeted for a senior population on land recently acquired by the Edina Housing Foundation. The development, intended to be named Cornelia View, will be located at 4040 West 70th Street within the City. Cornelia View Developers, LLC intends to redevelop the existing site which is home to an aged office building and parking lot. The new development will feature senior affordable rental housing complete with an amenity space with community-based programming and public art. The developer will demolish the existing building and clean up the site for redevelopment into a four-story, 145,300 square foot building complete with underground and surface parking to serve the site. The building will also have first floor common areas and space for leasing/management offices, as well as amenities including a lobby, fitness center, and a clubroom with kitchen. The site is also envisioned to feature walking paths through and around the site connecting to adjacent Southdale area. The proposed unit mix includes 97 one-bedroom and 21 two-bedroom units, all which will be restricted to households earning at or below 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI). The developer further intends to restrict occupancy and rents for at least 101 units across the 50% and 60% AMI household income thresholds. The developer will be applying for an allocation of federal low-income housing tax credits from the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) as well as supportive housing subsidies. To supplement the MHFA application, the Edina Housing Foundation and Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority are proposing to partner in writing down the land acquisition costs and provide tax increment assistance for the affordable housing development. The estimated cost of the development is $32.3 million. Pending award of the tax credits, construction is expected to begin in 2022 or 2023 with planned occupancy in the year after construction. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District 18 Appendix E: Special TIF Housing Legislation Minnesota Session Laws – 2019, 1st Special Session Chapter 6 – HF No. 5, Article 7 Sec. 3. Laws 2014, chapter 308, article 6, section 8, subdivision 1, as amended by Laws 2017, First Special Session chapter 1, article 6, section 11, is amended to read: Subdivision 1. Authority to create districts. (a) The governing body of the city of Edina or its development authority may establish one or more tax increment financing housing districts in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, as the boundaries exist on March 31, 2014. (b) The authority to request certification of districts under this section expires on December 31, 2019 2021. EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day after the governing body of the city of Edina and its chief clerical officer comply with Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021, subdivisions 2 and 3. Minnesota Session Laws – 2017, 1st Special Session Chapter 1 – HF No. 1, Article 6 Sec. 11. Laws 2014, chapter 308, article 6, section 8, subdivision 1, is amended to read: Subdivision 1. Authority to create districts. (a) The governing body of the city of Edina or its development authority may establish one or more tax increment financing housing districts in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, as the boundaries exist on March 31, 2014. (b) The authority to request certification of districts under this section expires on June 30, 2017 December 31, 2019. EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day after the governing body of the city of Edina and its chief clerical officer comply with Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021, subdivisions 2 and 3. Sec. 16. CITY OF EDINA; APPROVAL OF 2014 SPECIAL LAW. Notwithstanding the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021, subdivision 3, the chief clerical officer of the city of Edina may file with the secretary of state certificate of approval of Laws 2014, chapter 308, article 6, section 8, by December 31, 2016, and, if the certificate is so filed and the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021, subdivision 3, are otherwise complied with, the special law is deemed approved, and all actions taken by the city before the effective date of this section in reliance on Laws 2014, chapter 308, article 6, section 8, are deemed consistent with Laws 2014, chapter 308, article 6, section 8, and this act. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District 19 EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment. Minnesota Session Laws - 2014, Regular Session Chapter 308--HF No. 3167, Article 6 Sec. 8. CITY OF EDINA; TAX INCREMENT FINANCING. Subdivision 1. Authority to create districts. (a) The governing body of the city of Edina or its development authority may establish one or more tax increment financing housing districts in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, as the boundaries exist on March 31, 2014. (b) The authority to request certification of districts under this section expires on June 30, 2017. Subd. 2. Rules governing districts. (a) Housing districts established under this section are subject to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, sections 469.174 to 469.1794, except as otherwise provided in this subdivision. (b) Notwithstanding the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, section 469.176, subdivision 1b, no increment must be paid to the authority after 20 years after receipt by the authority of the first increment from a district established under this section. (c) Notwithstanding the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, section 469.1761, subdivision 3, for a residential rental project, the city may elect to substitute "20 percent" for "40 percent" in the 40-60 test under section 142(d)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code in determining the applicable income limits. (d) The provisions of Minnesota Statutes, section 469.1761, subdivision 3, apply for a 25-year period beginning on the date of certification of the district. Subd. 3. Pooling authority. The city may elect to treat expenditures of increment from the Southdale 2 district for a housing project of a district established under this section as expenditures qualifying under Minnesota Statutes, section 469.1763, subdivision 2, paragraph (d): (1) without regard to whether the housing meets the requirement of a qualified building under section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code; and (2) may increase by an additional 25 percentage points the permitted amount of expenditures for activities located outside the geographic area of the district permitted under that section. EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective upon compliance by the governing body of the city of Edina with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021, subdivisions 2 and 3. æ ¹» æ æ æ¹»æ æ ¹º¹º ¹º ñ ñ ¹»æ æ æ ¹º ¹º æ ¹º æ æ ¹º ¹º æ æ ¹º ñ ¹» æ æ ñ æ æ æ ñ ñ ñTRACY AVEVERNO N AVEWOODDALE AVEHANSEN RD70TH ST W FRANCE AVE SVALLEYVIEWRDMINNESOT A DRGLEASONRDEdinaCommunityCenter CalvinChristianSchool GoldenYears Montessori Edina MorningsideChurch City Hall EdinaCovenant CalvaryChurch St Stephen'sEpiscopal ColonyParkBaptist St Peter's Lutheran Church & School EdinaCommunityLutheran Church SouthviewJr High NormandaleElementary ConcordSchool CorneliaSchool Southdale Library FireStation ChristPresbyerianChurch Public Works &Park Maintenance St Patrick'sCatholic Calvary Lutheran Creek ValleySchool FireStation St. Alban'sEpiscopal Valley ViewJr High EdinaHighSchool CrossviewLutheran Creek ValleyBaptist Colonial Church Chapel Hills Congregational CountrysideSchool GoodSamaritanMethodist HighlandSchool Shephard ofthe HillsLutheran PublicLibrary Our Lady ofGrace Church & School NormandaleLutheran M in nehahaCreek NineMileCreek Nin eMileCreek 4040 W 70th St Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadBLAKE RDSCHAEFER RDV ERN O N A VECAHILL RD66TH ST W YORK AVE SINTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 4 4TH S T W 50TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST W 70TH ST W 76TH ST W DEWEY HILL RD VALLEY VIEW RD VALLEY VIEW RD 78TH ST W I-494 HWY 100HWY 169HWY 169HWY 100HWY 62 HWY 62 June 2021 ±Legend 4040 W 70th St TIF Boundary Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area 0 2,000 Feet Survey Responses 30 January 2019 - 08 August 2021 Public Hearing Comments- 4040 West70th St. TIF Better Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, establishment of the 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District, and the adoption of a Tax Increment Financing Plan VISITORS 3 CONTRIBUTORS 1 RESPONSES 1 0 Registered 0 Unverified 1 Anonymous 0 Registered 0 Unverified 1 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Aug 05, 2021 09:23:43 am Last Seen:Aug 05, 2021 09:23:43 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Tara Shaw Q2.Address 4501 Belvidere Ln, Edina, MN 55435, USA Q3.Comment I support the TIF for 4040 W 70th St. From the presentation at the Aug 4 city council meeting, it sounds like this will make up a small portion of the funding for the affordable housing project at this location, which is one of the best uses of TIF funds I can think of in Edina, where we need more affordable housing for seniors and other community members. The CITY of EDINA Cornelia View Apartments Creation of a New Housing TIF District Stephanie Hawkinson Affordable Housing Development Manager July 29, 2021 August 4, 2021 The CITY of EDINAToday’s Request: Approve Resolution No. 2021-60 Authorizing the creation of a new Housing TIF District to aid in the development of 118 units of age restricted 100% affordable housing. A Redevelopment Agreement will still need to be approved for TIF to be used. EdinaMN.gov 2 TIF Financial Gap The CITY of EDINA 3 Background –Community Support 2015 Community Vision: “Residential Development Mix … Continue to explore options for new multi-family housing throughout the city in mixed-use areas and near public spaces… create affordable housing options close to transit, shopping and employment centers ” (page 7) 2040 Comprehensive Plan: “Affordable housing is a necessary component of the housing mix. This is especially true given the demographic future of Greater Southdale. The expected growth in the senior population and the desire to attract young workers and families both point to the need to have more affordable housing, including options for those that might choose to move here from other parts of the community. (pg 85) Housing Strategy Task Force: •Housing Choice: Support the development of a wide range of housing options to meet the diverse needs and preferences for the existing and future Edina community. •Affordability: Encourage the development and maintenance of diverse housing options affordable to residents at a range of incomes and life stages. 2021 Quality of Life Survey: 14% of Resident who wrote in a response said there was a need for more affordable housing. The CITY of EDINAWhat is TIF? 4 •Boundaries •Maximum Budget •Term •Qualifications •But-for 1) Create “District” •Private developments •Public improvements 2) Consider Funding for Specific Projects •4-year knock down •5-year construction •Annual reporting •De-certification 3) Monitoring & Compliance Steps to Establish, Fund and Monitor TIF (defined in Minnesota TIF Statutes) Action considered at Public Hearing The CITY of EDINATax Increment Financing As a “Pay-Go Note” helps to leverage additional debt financing EdinaMN.gov 5 The CITY of EDINA 6 Edina has 8 active TIF Districts: •Southdale 2 •Pentagon Park •Grandview 2 •66 West •50th & France 2 •44th & France 2 •West 76th Street •Amundson Flats 44th & France 2 Proposed 4040 W. 70th St. TIF District TIF in Edina The CITY of EDINA 7 TIF in Edina: 2021 TIF in Edina is used on a limited Basis and to a lesser extent than Neighboring Cities The CITY of EDINA HRA TIF Districts EdinaMN.gov 8 Estimated Captured Tax Capacity –HRA’s Housing Districts •66 West $ 1,641 (0.01%) •Amundson $ 63,403 (0.04%) •West 76th $ 77,897 (0.05%) •Total $142,951 (0.09%) HRA’s existing Housing TIF Districts are anticipated to capture less than 1% of the future Edina tax base The CITY of EDINA •1 parcel •118 Units of Affordable Housing •“Affordable” Housing District •-Using Special Legislation approved in 2014 •21-year term (max.) •Allow pooling from Southdale 2 District •Estimated Annual Tax Increment = $202,948 •Creates approximately $3.2M in increment over 21-years •Estimated Increment for Housing = $1.8M in upfront construction proceeds 9 Proposed TIF District & TIF Plan The CITY of EDINAUse of TIF Funds Total Development Budget: $32,373,900 Sources: •First Mortgage $12,858,354 40% •TIF Leverage Mortgage $1,808,000 6% •4% Tax Credit Equity $10,164,422 31% •MHFA Deferred $4,894,098 15% •Met Council $1,000,000 3% •Hennepin County $740,000 3% •Energy/Sales Tax Rebates $486,380 1% •Remaining Gap $433,000 1% www.EdinaMN.gov 10 The CITY of EDINACommunity Outreach www.EdinaMN.gov 11 Notice of the Public Hearing was posted in Better Together Edina. There was 1 visitor and no comments. There was a Public Hearing notice also posted in the Sun Current on July 22, 2022. The CITY of EDINANext Steps Once all other source of financing are secured, a Redevelopment Agreement, including a TIF Pay-go Note, will be reviewed for approval. www.EdinaMN.gov 12 July 21, 2021 Mayor and City Council Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner West Promenade / Valley View Road from West 69th Street to West 70th Street Information / Background: On June 15, 2021, the City Council approved a development project at 4040 West 70th Street. As part of the approval, council asked staff to consider potential improvements to Valley View Road between West 69th and 70th Streets. This approximate location has been noted as a possible route for the West Promenade. The West Promenade, as described in the 2019 Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines, is a facility that would create a movement corridor for pedestrians and bicyclists and serve as transition space between residential neighborhoods and the District. In the same document, the proposed West Promenade is shown to parallel France Avenue between West 66th Street and Gallagher Drive, partially along Valley View Road and partially mid-block to divide larger development block (see Figure 1). Figure 1. Proposed West Promenade Alignment STAFF REPORT Page 2 The 2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan was built upon the framework of a similar facility. Modeled after the Grand Loop concept from the 2015 Parks Strategic Plan, the Twin Loops is a proposed shared-use pedestrian and bicycle facility that connects all four city quadrants, serving Edina schools, parks and community destinations. Near 4040 West 70th Street, the Inner Loop (which predominately connects to schools) is proposed on Southdale Road and Cornelia Drive within the residential neighborhood. The Outer Loop (which predominately connects to parks) is proposed on France Avenue and West 69th Street (see Figure 2). Figure 2. Twin Loops Alignments Staff has developed a concept that merges these two concepts into one facility along Valley View Road between West 69th and 70th Streets. The concept would build from the developer’s site plan of an 8-foot sidewalk with a 6-foot boulevard along the east side by narrowing vehicle lanes to 12 feet in each direction and creating a 12-foot wide shared-use facility along the west side with a 6-foot buffer to the neighborhood that could be landscaped with trees and shrubs (see Figure 3). STAFF REPORT Page 3 Figure 3. Valley View Road Concept between West 69th and 70th Streets Staff feels this concept creates a more realistic location for the Twin Loops and the West Promenade. It moves the Inner Loop away from residential neighborhood streets with a newer sidewalk. There is opportunity to continue the pedestrian improvements with future projects along Valley View Road from Highway 62 to 69th Street. 70th Street already has pedestrian and bicycle facilities that will connect this facility to the original Promenade on the east side of France Avenue. Funding On June 24, 2021, the HRA approved Resolution No. 2021-05 stating that the HRA will consider providing TIF financing for the development of 4040 W. 70th Street because it is an affordable housing project. The project will continue to advance the City’s goal of creating more affordable housing units. Statutory steps are in process to create the TIF District at his location. The TIF District at his location would be a Housing TIF District. A Housing TIF District can only be used to assist with the creation of housing. The street improvements considered along Valley View Road from 69th Street to 70th Street would not be eligible for these TIF funds. The estimated cost for this project along Valley View Road for street and pedestrian improvements is $600,000. Capital Improvement Project #15-225 HRA – Promenade Phase V is listed for 2024 with a budget of $600,000 from the Centennial Lake TIF District. This project was created as a placeholder for future buildout of the Promenade. The scope and location of that project has not been defined. STAFF REPORT Page 4 The improvements along Valley View Road are eligible for funding from the Centennial Lakes TIF District. Staff is asking for feedback from council on which project is a higher priority for the available funding. STAFF REPORT Page 5 Reference Materials Item # Document Section Comments 1 Greater Southdale Area District Plan Design Experience Guidelines Experience Guidelines Streets and Street Grid Typology B and C – Local Streets 2 Greater Southdale Area District Plan Design Experience Guidelines Transition Zones: Reimaging Valley View Drive “Redefine street as northern- most extent of the West Promenade and create residential transition” 3 Greater Southdale Area District Plan Design Experience Guidelines Street Rooms/Seam East and West Promenades 4 Transportation Chapter of Comprehensive Plan Proposed Pedestrian Facilities Twin Loops Facility Graphic 1. Transition Zone: Reimaging Valley View Road STAFF REPORT Page 6 Graphic 2. Street Typology B: 60-ft Wide Local Street Graphic 3. West Promenade Date: August 17, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-61, Ordinance No. 2021-10: Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Revised Overall Development Plan, Site Plan Review for 4911 77th Street West Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2021-61 and Ordinance No. 2021-10, and waive second reading. INTRODUCTION: The City Council is asked to consider a proposal for a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to revise the previously approved plans for the Pentagon Park South (PUD-17) known as P entagon Village, which was approved in 2019. The applicants, Jay Scott, Solomon Real Estate and Rise Development, are proposing to develop the vacant lot in the southeast corner of the development, with a 6-story, 200-unit apartment. Ten percent (10%) of the units would be for affordable housing. On May 26, 2021 the Planning Commission had motions made to approve and deny the request. Both failed on the same split votes. Vote: 4 Ayes and 4 Nays. Based on feedback from the Planning Commission, the applicant has submitted additional renderings to better show the project along the north side and ground level, which was an area that the Planning Commission had concerns in regard to lack of landscaping and greenspace. ATTACHMENTS: Description Better Together Public Hearing Comment Report 8-9-21 Noon Resolution No. 2021-61 Draft Ordinance No 2021-10 Staff Memos Sustainability Questionnaire Applicant Narrative Proposed Plans and Renderings Traffic and Parking Study Previously Approved Site Plan Approved Overall Development Plan Existing PUD Zoning for the Site Sketch Plans Revised Plans - Additional Renderings Applicant Presentation Additional Plan Renderings Survey Responses 30 January 2019 - 08 August 2021 Public Hearing Comments- PentagonSouth Apartments Better Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: Zoning Ordinance Amendment to the PUD-17, Planned Unit Development District - 17 to change the use on Lot 3 of Pentagon Village from a 153-room extended stay hotel to a 200-unit apartment at 4911 77th St W. VISITORS 6 CONTRIBUTORS 3 RESPONSES 3 2 Registered 0 Unverified 1 Anonymous 2 Registered 0 Unverified 1 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:JoelZaslofsky Email:jezaslof@gmail.com Responded At:Jul 13, 2021 19:41:24 pm Last Seen:Jul 14, 2021 02:34:29 am IP Address:75.73.194.112 Q1.First and Last Name Joel Zaslofsky Q2.Address 7124 Heatherton Trl, Edina, MN 55435 Q3.Comment How can I even comment on this development when it's so light on real, useful information? I reviewed the full "Zoning Ordinance Amendment Application Narrative For the Pentagon Village Apartments on Lot 3" document and it lacks substance in almost all ways – at least for a non-developer and non-city planner like me. Compare Cuningham's document with Solhem's equivalent document for Pentagon Park Housing Development at 4660 77th St West and you'll see what I mean. Solhem's not only communicated the vision, but gave specifics in writing. It also had visuals with data and text overlays that allowed someone in the local area like me to envision the development much better. So do I like or not like Cuningham's proposal? I have no idea. The lack of clarity makes me disapprove of the development because I have so little to base a factual decision upon. Can we *please* get an updated document like Solhem's with real data, real bullet points, and designed for some of your average residents to decipher? Respondent No:2 Login:B. Anderson Email:betteanderson@yahoo.com Responded At:Jul 24, 2021 14:40:14 pm Last Seen:Jul 24, 2021 21:14:53 pm IP Address:65.128.191.115 Q1.First and Last Name Bette Anderson Q2.Address 4936 Poppy Lane, Edina, MN 55435 Q3.Comment I can't decide which is worse - the extended stay hotel or the apartment complex. The extended stay hotel will just invite transients to the area with no permanent commitment to caring for the structure or surrounding areas. Edina already has a rising crime problem due to increased, excessive density. An extended stay hotel will only invite undesirable elements with nefarious intent. Not all guests, of course, would be parties to criminal activity, but probably enough to create additional law enforcement challenges and a deterrent to well-intentioned guests. An apartment complex with 200 units would only promote even more density with multiple family members living in these units. "Affordable housing," while sounding so righteous and justifiable, may well invite undesirable individuals to the area, giving them a perfect gateway at 494 and 100. In addition, all of this building in the new Pentagon Park development is going to increase traffic fundamentally on both Hwy. 100 and 494, as well as 77th and France, etc., etc. Traffic is already much too congested on 100 and 494 in this area as well as on France. My backyard is adjacent to Hwy. 100 with the on-ramp from 77th onto 100 directly behind my house. Noise, fumes, sirens, motorcycles already create issues for the homes whose backyards abut the on-ramp from 77th to Hwy. South. There may have to be additional sound/air pollution studies done as to how all of the additional traffic will affect my neighborhood and others close by. Retail/office space would be a much better choice for this lot, creating far fewer problems/issues into the future. And complain we will once the negative effects begin to become evident and further disintegrate our air/sound quality even to the undesirable extent that it will affect our property values. Respondent No:3 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Aug 05, 2021 09:19:21 am Last Seen:Aug 05, 2021 09:19:21 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Tara Shaw Q2.Address 4501 Belvidere Ln, Edina, MN 55435, USA Q3.Comment I applaud any development that includes provisions for affordable housing in Edina. We are in desperate need of diversity in our community and have a scarcity of affordable housing today. I'm in full support of changing the use of the lot to a 200 unit apartment building. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-61 APPROVING AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO CHANGED THE USE AND APPROVED OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLANS INCLUDING REVISED FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IN THE PUD-17 ZONING DISTRICT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 The applicant is proposing an ordinance amendment to revise the previously approved plans for the Pentagon Park South (PUD-17) known as Pentagon Village, which was approved in 2019. 1.02 The applicants, Jay Scott, Solomon Real Estate and Rise Development, are proposing to develop the vacant lot in the southeast corner of the development, with a 6-story, 200-unit apartment. Ten percent (10%) of the units would be for affordable housing. 1.03 The overall development site in PUD-17 is 12.5 acres. The uses approved for the PUD include retail space, a 235-room hotel, a 153-room hotel, and a parking ramp in phase one; phase two included two 5-story office buildings, a parking ramp (expansion) and 19,000 square feet of office/retail. 1.04 The approved plans for the specific site we are looking at called for the development of the 5- story 153 room hotel. The proposal is to amend the Overall Development Plan to replace the hotel with a 200-unit apartment. 1.05 The property is legally described as follows: Lot 3, Block 1, Pentagon Village Hennepin County Minn. 1.06 To accommodate the request, the following is required: A Zoning Ordinance Amendment to change the use and approved development plans, including revised final site plan approval for this site within the existing PUD-17 District. 1.07 On May 26, 2021 after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. Motions to approve and deny the request failed on split votes. Vote: 4 Ayes and 4 Nays. 1.08 On July 21, 2021 the City Council approved the request. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-61 Page 2 Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses, and density are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The project is consistent with the following goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan: • Encourage the development and maintenance of a range of housing options affordable to residents at all income levels and life stages. • Seek opportunities to increase the supply of affordable housing, as well as to preserve the affordability of existing affordable housing. • Facilitate the development of new housing that accommodates the needs of a people of diverse needs and from diverse backgrounds. • A pedestrian-friendly environment. • Support continued livability and high quality of life for all city residents by balancing goals and priorities for development, especially as the community responds to changes over time. • Support the development of mixed-use districts that provide a variety of living opportunities within a walkable and livable area. • Encourage infill and redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure, complement community context and character, and respond to needs at all stages of life. • Primary uses in the OR, Office Residential category, which this site is located within are offices, attached or multifamily housing. Secondary uses: Limited retail and service uses (not including “big box" retail), limited industrial (fully enclosed), institutional uses, parks and open space. 3. The proposed use is allowed as a permitted principal use in the existing PUD-17 Zoning District. Residential uses are encouraged to activate the public spaces beyond the hours of 9 am to 5 pm. Residential housing would support the retail uses within the development and area. 4. The site plan is generally consistent with the approved site plan for the site. 5. The proposal includes the provision of 20 units within the development to be dedicated for affordable housing. The proposed project would help the City meet its affordable housing goals established with the Metropolitan Council of 1,804 new affordable housing units by the year 2030. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Zoning Ordinance Amendment to change the use and approved development plans, including revised final site plan approval for this site within the existing PUD-17 District. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans date stamped June 16, 2021, and the new plans submitted to the City Council at the public hearing. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-61 Page 3 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo and transportation planner dated July 9, 2021. 8. Compliance with the Wenck Consulting Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. 9. Subject to City Council approval of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment revising the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 10. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the fire marshal and building official’s memo dated July 2, 2021. 11. Hours of construction must be consistent with City Code. 12. Ten percent (10%) of the units must be provided for affordable housing for families or individuals earning 60% area median income (AMI) for the Twin Cities. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-61 Page 4 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on August 17, 2021. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 17, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2021. _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk DRAFT ORDINANCE FOR CONSIDERATION Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX ORDINANCE NO. 2021-10 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO REVISE THE PUD-17, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-17 ZONING DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 36-507 Planned Unit Development District-17 (PUD-17) Pentagon Park South (a) Legal description: See attached Exhibit A (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans, including the master development plan for the site received by the City on January 17, 2019 except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2019-17 on file in the Office of the Planning Department. (c) Revised Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the revised plans for 4911 77th Street West as approved by City Council Resolution No. 2021-61 on file in the office of the Planning Department. (d) Principal Uses: All uses allowed in the MDD-6 Zoning District Multi-family Apartments/Condos. (e) Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the MDD-3-6 Zoning District. (f) Conditional Uses: All conditional uses allowed in the MDD-3-6 Zoning District. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX (g) Development Standards. (h) Signs shall be regulated per the Mixed Development District. (i) Ninety percent (90%) of the parking stalls within the development shall be available to all uses within the development. (j) Ten percent (10%) of the units must be provided for affordable housing for families or individuals earning 60% area median income (AMI) for the Twin Cities. Required Setbacks - Buildings 77th Street Computer Avenue Normandale Boulevard Viking Drive 15 feet 15 feet 50 feet 10 Feet Building Height 12 stories & 144 feet per the height overlay district Parking lot and drive aisle setback 20 feet Building Coverage 30% Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.5% Parking Stalls – Mixed Development District Phase 1 (Based on the uses) 602 stalls + 152 enclosed stalls for the residential use on Lot 3, Block 1 Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX First Reading: August 4, 2021 Second Reading: Published: Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk The Planning Commission is asked to consider a proposal for a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to revise the previously approved plans for the Pentagon Park South (PUD-17) known as Pentagon Village, which was approved in 2019. The applicants, Jay Scott, Solomon Real Estate and Rise Development, are proposing to develop the vacant lot in the southeast corner of the development, with a 6-story, 200-unit apartment. Ten percent (10%) of the units would be for affordable housing. The overall development site in PUD-17 is 12.5 acres. The uses approved for the PUD include retail space, a 235-room hotel, a 153-room hotel, and a parking ramp in phase one; phase two included two 5-story office buildings, a parking ramp (expansion) and 19,000 square feet of office/retail. (See approved Overall PUD-17 Plans.) The approved plans for the specific site we are looking at called for the development of the 5-story 153 room hotel. The proposal is to amend the Overall Development Plan to replace the hotel with a 200-unit apartment. The request requires the following: 1. A Zoning Ordinance Amendment to change the use and approved development plans, including revised final site plan approval for this site within the existing PUD-17 District. The PUD Zoning is used to ensure affordable housing on the site. July 14, 2021 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Revised Overall Development Plan, Site Plan Review– 4911 77th Street West Information / Background: STAFF REPORT Page 2 The applicant has noted the following revisions based on the feedback during sketch plan review in their narrative: The building façade has been specifically designed with consideration of articulation and placement of materials. Natural materials have been incorporated into the design especially at key points of pedestrian engagement in an effort to create a building that is timeless and transformative for the area. The designers have thoughtfully considered the pedestrian experience and have emphasized connections, both within the property to the existing Pentagon Village Plaza and further to the Fred Richards Park and the 9 Mile Creek trail located north of the site. The Site Plan and Landscape Plan include of a variety of site amenities to enhance the pedestrian experience including benches, planters, bike racks, and variation in ground surface material. Public art punctuates the pedestrian pathways at key locations. The northern edge of the building and site has been carefully considered as both a vehicular and pedestrian entry experience into the Pentagon Village. The main entry to the building is placed at the northwest corner to draw guests into the site and reflect some of the energy generated from the central plaza. The northeast corner is activated with a lounge/flex-space that opens out to an outdoor patio. This seating area will provide an active and lively entry experience to Pentagon Village from Computer Avenue. Ease of flow throughout the Village has always been a goal. There is both pedestrian and bike connections on the west side of the building, creating an inviting experience for pedestrians entering the Pentagon Village from Viking Drive. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Multi-family residential and retail; zoned MDD-6, Mixed Development District and guided OR, Office Residential. Easterly: Office/light industrial uses; zoned PID, Planned Industrial District and guided OR, Office Residential. Southerly: City of Bloomington. Westerly: Highway 100. Existing Site Features The subject site within the PUD is vacant and relatively flat. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Planning Guide Plan designation: Office/Residential (20-75 residential units per acre) Zoning: PUD-17, Planned Unit Development District-17 Parking Based on the proposal for 200 units of apartments, 400 parking stalls would be required under current City Code; however, under the draft ordinance recommended by the Planning Commission, 250 parking stalls would be provided. The proposed plan calls for 152 enclosed parking stalls, 5 surface stalls and 93 stalls within the existing parking ramp for a total of 250 stalls, which would comply with the proposed Ordinance. The previously proposed hotel only provided 5 parking stalls, and 148 stalls within the adjacent ramp to meet the parking requirements. The proposal would require less reliance on the adjacent parking ramp, which would allow more use by future projects within Pentagon Village, including availability of public parking. Wenck Associates Consulting conducted a parking study and concluded that the proposed parking would be adequate to serve the proposed residential project as long as the parking spaces within the parking ramp are utilized. (See attached parking study and addendum.) Site Circulation/Traffic The proposal would not change the circulation of the overall development plan for Pentagon Village. Vehicle access would be the interior roadway. Access to the on-site enclosed parking would be on the west side of the building. There would be sidewalks provided on all four sides of the building, including a north/south pedestrian/bikeway on the west side of the building. Exterior bike racks are proposed on both the west and east sides of the building. And interior bike storage is proposed in the enclosed parking garage. Wenck Associated conducted a traffic study. The study concludes that the existing roadways can be supported by the project, and no roadway improvements are necessary. Recommendations have been made regarding Travel Demand Management strategies. (See attached traffic study.) Landscaping The landscape plan is generally consistent with the previously approved landscape plan for the site. (See the approved overall development plan.) There would be overstory trees planted along Computer Drive and Viking Drive. A full complement of understory shrubs and bushes are proposed. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined in the attached engineering memo. (See attached memo dated July 9, 2021.) A site improvement plan agreement would be required for the construction of the proposed sidewalks and utilities. Any approvals of this project would be subject to review and approval of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, as they are the City’s review authority over the grading of the site. Building/Building Material The building materials would be a combination brick veneer with architectural metal panels (See attached renderings and building materials.) Mechanical Equipment Any rooftop and/or ground level equipment would have to be screened if visible from adjacent property lines. Final Plans must include location of mechanical equipment and the means of screening. No ground level mechanical equipment shall be located within the front yard of the development. Compliance Table PUD-17 Proposed Setbacks - Buildings 77th Street Computer Avenue Normandale Boulevard Viking Drive 15 feet 15 feet 50 feet 10 Feet NA 21 feet NA 12 feet Building Height 12 stories & 144 feet per the height overlay district 6 stories and 68 feet Parking lot and drive aisle setback 20 feet 20 feet Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.5% 1.5% STAFF REPORT Page 5 PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the proposal reasonable to justify the revised PUD rezoning of the site? Yes. Staff supports the revised site and revised use for this site for the following reasons: 1. The proposed use is allowed as a permitted principal use in the existing PUD-17 Zoning District. (See the attached PUD-17 Ordinance) Residential uses are encouraged to activate the public spaces beyond the hours of 9 am to 5 pm. Residential housing would support the retail uses within the development and area. 2. The site plan is generally consistent with the approved site plan for the site. 3. The proposal includes the provision of 20 units within the development to be dedicated for affordable housing. The proposed project would help the City meet its affordable housing goals established with the Metropolitan Council of 1,804 new affordable housing units by the year 2030. 4. The project is consistent with the following goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan: • Encourage the development and maintenance of a range of housing options affordable to residents at all income levels and life stages. • Seek opportunities to increase the supply of affordable housing, as well as to preserve the affordability of existing affordable housing. • Facilitate the development of new housing that accommodates the needs of a people of diverse needs and from diverse backgrounds. • A pedestrian-friendly environment. • Support continued livability and high quality of life for all city residents by balancing goals and priorities for development, especially as the community responds to changes over time. • Support the development of mixed-use districts that provide a variety of living opportunities within a walkable and livable area. • Encourage infill and redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure, complement community context and character, and respond to needs at all stages of life. • Primary uses in the OR, Office Residential category, which this site is located within are offices, attached or multifamily housing. Secondary uses: Limited retail and service uses (not including “big box" retail), limited industrial (fully enclosed), institutional uses, parks and open space. STAFF REPORT Page 6 RECOMMENDATION Recommend the City Council approve the request for an Ordinance Amendment, revised Overall Development Plan and revised final site plan approval to amend the existing PUD for the site. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses, and density are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The project is consistent with the following goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan: • Encourage the development and maintenance of a range of housing options affordable to residents at all income levels and life stages. • Seek opportunities to increase the supply of affordable housing, as well as to preserve the affordability of existing affordable housing. • Facilitate the development of new housing that accommodates the needs of a people of diverse needs and from diverse backgrounds. • A pedestrian-friendly environment. • Support continued livability and high quality of life for all city residents by balancing goals and priorities for development, especially as the community responds to changes over time. • Support the development of mixed-use districts that provide a variety of living opportunities within a walkable and livable area. • Encourage infill and redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure, complement community context and character, and respond to needs at all stages of life. • Primary uses in the OR, Office Residential category, which this site is located within are offices, attached or multifamily housing. Secondary uses: Limited retail and service uses (not including “big box" retail), limited industrial (fully enclosed), institutional uses, parks and open space. 3. The proposed use is allowed as a permitted principal use in the existing PUD-17 Zoning District. Residential uses are encouraged to activate the public spaces beyond the hours of 9 am to 5 pm. Residential housing would support the retail uses within the development and area. 4. The site plan is generally consistent with the approved site plan for the site. 5. The proposal includes the provision of 20 units within the development to be dedicated for affordable housing. The proposed project would help the City meet its affordable housing goals established with the Metropolitan Council of 1,804 new affordable housing units by the year 2030. STAFF REPORT Page 7 Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans date stamped June 16, 2021. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo and transportation planner dated July 9, 2021. 8. Compliance with the Wenck Consulting Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. 9. Subject to City Council approval of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment revising the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 10. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the fire marshal and building official’s memo dated July 2, 2021. 11. Hours of construction must be consistent with City Code. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the request subject to the findings listed above. Deadline for a city decision: October 5, 2021 TO: Cary Teague FROM: Stephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager DATE: July 2, 2021 RE: Pentagon Village Apartments Based on the application narrative, the proposed Pentagon Village Apartments will be complying with the Policy for New Multifamily Housing by providing 10% of the units to households with incomes at 50% of Area Median Income. This equates to 20 units of affordable housing. Although fewer in number than if the developer were providing 20% of units to tenants with incomes at 60% of AMI, the 50% units are needed in the City. 2040 Comprehensive Plan Goals Forecasted Need Proposed % Remaining Total Units 1804 354 19.6% 1450 <30% AMI 751 22 2.9% 729 31-50% AMI 480 153 31.9% 327 51-80% AMI 573 179 31.2% 394 Of the developments that have been reviewed, approved or completed since the crafting of the 2040 Comprehensive plan, 354 are affordable. I cannot speak to the unit mix or the market rate comparisons. July 2, 2021 Cary Teague, Community Development Director David Fisher, Chief Building Official Zoning Ordinance Amendment for Pentagon Village South Lot 3 New 200-unit five story Apartment Building Information / Background: New five-story apartment building with 200-units. -This would be an R-2 residential apartment building using the 2020 Minnesota State Building Code & Fire Code. - Provide a complete Build Code analysis with plans when submitting for the building permit. - NFPA 13 Fire Sprinkler System is required and NFPA 72 Fire Alarm System is required. - Emergency Responder 800 MHZ Radio Coverage Permit Required. - Verify Address. - Verify fire hydrant location within 100ft of FDC near main entrance. - Verify Fire Department access. - Verify that balconies on this apartment building have enough room to install any kind of grill and meet the Fire Department requirements. - Verify there is adequate assessable parking. - Verify noise ordinance is complying and understood. Working Hours: Monday – Friday 7 A.M. to 7 P.M. Saturdays – 9A.M. to 5 P.M. Sundays and Holidays – No Work Allowed - Recommend a meeting with staff for 30, 60 and 90 percent before submitting for building permit. DATE: 7/9/2021 TO: 4911 77th St W, Owner and Development Team CC: Cary Teague – Community Development Director FROM: Zuleyka Marquez, PE, Graduate Engineer Ross Bintner, PE, Engineering Services Manager Grace Hancock, Sustainability Coordinator Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner RE: 4911 77th St W – Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for pedestrian facilities, utility connections, grading, flood risk, and storm water. Plans reviewed included civil, landscape, and survey drawings dated 6/16/21. Review Comment Required For General 1.Existing easements held by the City require Council action to vacate if deemed appropriate and necessary for the project. Consideration of requests can require up to 60-days to process. General Comment 1a. The proposal to vacate and relocate the existing hydrant and associated easement will have to be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department. New recorded easement, if approved, is required at permit closeout. Grading/Building Permit 2.Deliver as-build records of public and private utility infrastructure (if there are changes to existing) and grading post construction. Certificate of Occupancy 3.Maintenance of sidewalks to be responsibility of property owner.General Comment Survey 4.An existing and proposed site condition survey is required.Grading/Building Permit 4.1 Show all existing and proposed public and private easements. Grading/Building Permit Living Streets 5.Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements.Grading/Building Permit 6.Saw cut concrete sidewalk joints on public sidewalks.Grading/Building Permit 7. Public sidewalk to be minimum 5’ in width with a 5’ boulevard or 6’ in width without a boulevard. Grading/Building Permit Traffic and Street 8. Review fire access requirements with fire department. Grading/Building Permit 9. Commercial driveway entrance permit required for entrance reconstruction. Entrance shall conform to standard plate 415. Building Permit 10. Viking Drive is scheduled to be milled and overlaid in 2022. Computer Ave was milled and overlaid in 2019. Road patching shall conform to Edina Standard Plates 540 and 541. Certificate of Occupancy Sanitary and Water Utilities 11. Verify fire demand and hydrant locations. Grading/Building Permit 12. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 13. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 14. Apply for a sewer and water connection permit with Public Works, as needed. Prior to Starting Utility Work 14.1 Meter required for building service line and combined lines. No meter required for fire only service line. Grading/Building Permit 14.2 Public Works to determine acceptable installation methods. Grading/Building Permit 15. Disconnected sanitary and water services to be capped at main, if any. 16. A SAC determination will be required by the Metropolitan Council. The SAC determination will be used by the City to calculate sewer and water connection charges Grading/Building Permit 17. A sealed well is located onsite. No issue. General comment Storm Water Utility 18. Provide geotechnical report with soil borings. Grading/Building Permit 19. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report meeting watershed and state construction site permit requirements. Report should reference prior master development stormwater management plan and describe how this site changes and modifies the prior assumptions for stormwater. Grading/Building Permit 20. Submit watershed district permit and copies of private maintenance agreement in favor of watershed. Grading/Building Permit 21. Lowest opening required at no less than 824.4’. Grading/Building Permit 22. Provide net cut/fill calculations to ensure no net fill below 822.4’. Grading/Building Permit Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 23. A SWPPP consistent with the State General Construction Site Stormwater Permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Constructability and Safety 24. Construction staging, traffic control, and pedestrian access plans will be required. Grading/Building Permit Other Agency Coordination 25. MDH, MPCA and MCES permits required as needed. Grading/Building Permit 26a. Proof of MPCA permit closure required. Certificate of Occupancy 26. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Sustainability 27. The Metropolitan Council's Extreme Heat map shows that during an extreme heat event (when air temperatures are 90 or above), this area of Edina can be 4-9 degrees F hotter than surrounding areas. Green roofs reduce the urban heat island effect, reducing amount of greenhouse gas emissions trapped in the atmosphere and energy needs to cool a building. Staff recommends increasing the amount of green roof or garden to reduce this urban heat island effect and energy costs to cool the building. General Comment 28. The University of Minnesota's Solar Suitability map rates this site as "good" for solar roof installations with a grade of 83 out of 100. Staff recommends considering rooftop solar panels to maximize benefits of renewable energy. General Comment 29. The City of Edina has a goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 30% by 2025 and 45% by 2030. To help the City achieve this goal, staff recommends this site consider accessing renewable energy for at least 30% of the building’s total energy needs. Accessing renewable energy could be installing a solar array on site, purchasing renewable energy credits, or subscribing to renewable energy offsite. General Comment 30. Staff recommends installing EV chargers for a minimum of 5% (7 stalls) of proposed parking in addition to wiring 10% (14 stalls) for EV conversion in the future. General Comment 31. Staff recommends site consider applying for EV carshare infrastructure support via HourCar’s multi-family building grant program found here. General Comment 32. Staff understands from the Sustainable Design Questionnaire submitted on July 6, 2021 that the development team commits to the following: Utilize Xcel Energy’s Energy Design Assistance program Install Energy Star appliances Include partial green roof at amenity deck Provide shade trees beyond those required by code Include native plantings in landscaping Include pollinator-friendly plantings in landscaping Train future owners and managers in methods to avoid harmful chemicals used on landscaping Recycling and separate scrap or excess construction materials Provide separate recycling dumpsters and training for workers Provide recycling services to tenants Provide space for organics recycling in the future Install low-flow fixtures Include a water sensor for outdoor landscape watering system Include bike parking for guests and residents Provide EV charging for residents General Comment 33. Site plan shows bike storage within the underground parking. Staff recommends providing a minimum of one bike parking stall for every 10 residential units (20) and one surface bike parking stall for every 20 residential units (10). These parking stalls should be in convenient, well-lit locations within 50’ of a public entrance to the building. Rack style and spacing should follow the recommendations of the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (APBP). General Comment 34. Staff recommends implementing four (min.) suggested additional Travel Demand Management strategies: Provide surface bike parking (10 stalls min.); Provide a bike repair station on-site, located adjacent to surface or underground bike parking; Construct perimeter and internal sidewalks 8’ wide or more to safely accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists; Provide directional signage/information for adjacent pedestrians, bicycle and transit facilities and ride-sharing services; Subsidize Metro Transit passes for tenants/employees. General Comment City of Edina – New Construction Sustainability Questionnaire Page 1 City of Edina Sustainable Construction Questionnaire The City of Edina has set ambitious goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the community. To help achieve these goals, developers seeking City approval must complete this form as part of their zoning application. Upon receipt of this form, please email Sustainability Coordinator, Grace Hancock, GHancock@edinamn.gov, to set up a time to walk through the form and discuss sustainable building strategies. Please email the completed form to Cary Teague, CTeague@edinamn.gov, and copy Grace Hancock. Topics Answers Yes or No Brief Description Sustainable Design & Energy Consumption Will you utilize Xcel Energy’s Energy Design Assistance and/or Centerpoint Energy’s Builder and Developer programs for this development? Yes Started Xcel EDA process. Will the buildings meet SB2030 energy goals? No Meet 2020 MN Energy Code Will the building be LEED certified? No Will all appliances and equipment be Energy Star or EPA WaterSense certified? Yes Energy Star Appliances Will different strategies to conserve energy (beyond those required by code) be included? If so, please describe Yes Evaluating mechanical systems and envelope for potential efficiencies Will there be renewable energy such as solar or wind be generated on site? No Will the project include a geothermal system? No Will the completed project subscribe to a community solar program or other renewable energy program? No Will there be purchase of renewable energy credits (RECs)? No Potential for purchasing RECs if required Comments: Managing Storm Water What percent of the property is pervious surface before the redevelopment? What is the percent post development? 100%, <50% Site design in process What new surfaces will be pervious? (i.e. Sidewalks, driveways, overflow parking) Planting beds, landscape lawns & boulevards Will a green roof be included on the new structure to assist in storm water retention? Yes Partial green roof at amenity deck Will rain gardens or similar features be included on site to filter and retain the storm water? No Existing underground stormwater system Comments: Landscaping Features to Manage Air Quality and Heat Island Effect Will existing healthy trees be protected and saved? N/A There are no existing trees on site. City of Edina – New Construction Sustainability Questionnaire Page 2 City of Edina Sustainable Construction Questionnaire What percent of the property is covered by tree canopy before redevelopment? What is the percent post development? 0%, estimated 5-10% Will you be replanting/replacing trees at least four to five inches in diameter to positively impact the tree canopy (ordinance requirement is only 2.5 inches in diameter)? No No existing trees on site Will shade trees be provided along roadways, drives and surface parking areas beyond those required by code? Yes Will native plantings be used in the landscaping? Yes Will landscaping include pollinator-friendly varieties? Yes Will future owners and managers be trained in methods to avoid harmful chemicals being used on landscaping? Yes Comments: Managing Construction Waste Will demolition of existing structures meet LEED Green Building Demolition and/or B3 State of Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines? N/A No existing structures Will existing building elements be salvaged for reuse? Example, timber, steel, asphalt, cabinets, etc. N/A Are scrap and excess construction materials being separated and recycled? Yes Are workers provided with separate recycling dumpsters and training in proper use? Yes Comments: Managing Operational Waste Will a recycling service be provided to those in the multifamily complex? To any businesses on site? Yes Recycling will be provided for residents Will an organic recycling service be provided to those in the multifamily complex? To all businesses on site? No Space will be allocated for organic recycling in the future Will future users of the building be provided with education and training regarding proper recycling practices? Yes Comments: Managing Water Consumption Is the project including features to reduce water consumption beyond features required by code? Yes Units will feature low-flow fixtures Is there a grey water system included to reuse water on site? Will future users of the building be provided with education and training regarding conservation of water? No City of Edina – New Construction Sustainability Questionnaire Page 3 City of Edina Sustainable Construction Questionnaire Will outdoor landscaping watering system include a water sensor to automatically reduce watering in wet conditions? Yes Comments: Sustainable Transportation Features Is the site accessible by public transit within ½ mile? Yes Are site features included to make the use of public transit convenient and simple? Examples include sheltered waiting areas, paved sidewalks and clear site lines. Yes Lobby and bike parking connected to sidewalks and paths If there is no public transit within ½ mile, is the project providing features to help bridge the distance to allow flexibility to use public transit? N/A Is bike Parking available near the main entrance for guests? Space in parking structure (e.g. bike corral, bike lockers) for residents’ bikes? Yes Secure bike parking will be provided for residents, bike parking will also be provided for guests. Is bike parking and a shower facility provided for employees? No Do you have EV Charging Stations for owners, guests or customers to use? Yes EV charging provided for residents Will there be parking spaces provided for car- sharing vehicles to reduce the overall number of cars? No Updated January 2021 Zoning Ordinance Amendment Application Narrative For the Pentagon Village Apartments on Lot 3 Zoning Ordinance Amendment Application for Lot 3 This Zoning Ordinance Amendment application seeks to amend the existing Pentagon Village PUD to change the use on Lot 3 from the previously approved 153-room extended stay hotel to an approximate 200-unit multi-family housing community. Multi-Family Housing Project Description The proposed building will include approximately 200 for-rent apartment units in five levels. The building will also include one level of covered on-grade parking. Additional parking will be available in a small surface lot and within the existing parking structure on the adjacent lot. Continuing with the approach of crafted views into the site and having all building front doors have a connection to Pentagon Village as a whole, this building has been positioned on the site to create a welcoming and connected entry experience for guests and residents alike. At the second level, the U-shaped building wraps a courtyard amenity deck which opens to the south, having the potential to further activate and enhance the street edge along Viking Drive. This building will become an integral part of Pentagon Village and help to balance the development, activating the site with permanent residents 24 hours a day. The residents will enjoy the convenient access to the surrounding amenities, ease of access to various types of transportation, and the welcoming open and green spaces throughout Pentagon Village. Commitment to Sustainable Development The design of this residential building will fulfill a commitment and holistic approach to sustainable design taking into consideration energy use, water use, place making, ecology, materials, circularity of products (supply chain), as well as equity and justice for both the residents and the neighborhood. This building will be constructed with Modular units by RISE modular. Modular construction is inherently sustainable for a variety of reasons including but not limited to a substantial reduction in construction waste, less disturbance of the site during construction, decrease in energy consumption during construction, and overall emissions decrease by minimizing construction deliveries to the site. The site will be thoughtfully considered in terms of sustainable landscaping (drought tolerant and low water use), permeable surfaces, water treatment, and connection and promotion of alternative transportation. The building construction will include multiple energy and water savings measures throughout. Ultimately, the effort that will be put towards great design and the use of quality construction methods will facilitate the construction of a landmark building at the edge of the Pentagon Village development. These measures will ensure the longevity of the use of this building, making it ultimately sustainable. City of Edina Zoning Ordinance Amendment Application Narrative Pentagon Village – Lot 3 Page 2 Commitment to Affordable Housing We recognize the need to provide a range of affordable housing choices for those who live and work in the City of Edina. The Pentagon Village Apartments will provide a minimum of 10% of its residential units at 50% of the average market income (AMI). The development team and ownership of the Pentagon Village Apartments will provide this affordable housing component at no cost to the city or public. Compatibility with Pentagon Village PUD Zoning The current PUD zoning for Pentagon Village was established to provide more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The current Pentagon Village PUD allows for a mix of uses including retail, office, hospitality and multi-family housing. The proposed zoning ordinance amendment to the Pentagon Village PUD meets the intent of the PUD by including the following: • The proposed multi-family housing project maintains a development pattern and use that is consistent with the existing Pentagon Village PUD. • The proposed multi-family housing project incorporates design elements that are consistent within Pentagon Village and include: sustainable design, new technologies in building design and construction, special construction materials, enhanced landscaping and lighting, and a pedestrian-oriented design that establishes appropriate transitions and connections between the differing land uses. • The proposed multi-family housing project provides an exceptionally high quality of design that is aesthetically compatible with the surrounding land uses, including both existing and proposed. Response to Sketch Plan Review Comments To address the comments and suggestions received during the Sketch Plan presentation to the Planning Commission and City Council, the Design Team has implemented the following items in the current Site and Building Design: • The building façade has been specifically designed with consideration of articulation and placement of materials. Natural materials have been incorporated into the design especially at key points of pedestrian engagement in an effort to create a building that is timeless and transformative for the area. City of Edina Zoning Ordinance Amendment Application Narrative Pentagon Village – Lot 3 Page 3 • The designers have thoughtfully considered the pedestrian experience and have emphasized connections, both within the property to the existing Pentagon Village Plaza and further to the Fred Richards Park and the 9 Mile Creek trail located north of the site. • The Site Plan and Landscape Plan include of a variety of site amenities to enhance the pedestrian experience including benches, planters, bike racks, and variation in ground surface material. Public art punctuates the pedestrian pathways at key locations. • The northern edge of the building and site has been carefully considered as both a vehicular and pedestrian entry experience into the Pentagon Village. The main entry to the building is placed at the northwest corner to draw guests into the site and reflect some of the energy generated from the central plaza. • In order to enhance the public realm on a 24 hour basis, studies of how the building will appear both during day and night have been shown in the building illustrations. • The northeast corner is activated with a lounge/flex-space that opens out to an outdoor patio. This seating area will provide an active and lively entry experience to Pentagon Village from Computer Avenue. • Ease of flow throughout the Village has always been a goal. There is both pedestrian and bike connections on the west side of the building, creating an inviting experience for pedestrians entering the Pentagon Village from Viking Drive. 494 100 N SITE Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Project Information Project No.:PIC / AIC: Date:Phase: Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 6/16/2021 4:56:49 PMBIM 360://21-0068 - RISE and Solomon Real Estate Group - Pentagon Apartments/21-0068_Pentagon_Apartments.rvtCover G000 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 21-0068 06/16/2021DD JS PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMIT APPLICATION Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMIT APPLICATION Project LocationProject Team Name: Contact: Address: Phone: FAX:E-Mail: PENTAGON APARTMENTS, LLC Christian LawrenceJay Scott Campbell Mithun Tower Minneapolis, MN 55402 Christian -(612) 913-4949Jay -(651) 336-6060clawrence@risemodular.com, OWNER 222 S 9th St, Suite 3700 Name: Contact: Address: Phone: FAX:E-Mail: CUNINGHAM GROUP David Stahl 201 Main Street SE Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612) 379-3400 ARCHITECT Suite 325 Name: Contact: Address: Phone: FAX:E-Mail: EMANUELSON-PODUS, INC Michael Webert, PE MechanicalMatthew Fults, PE Electrical 7705 Bush Lake Road Michael-(952) 540-4013, Matthew-(952) 540-4017 mwebert@epinc.com, mfults@epinc.com MEP CONSULTANT Edina, MN 55439 Name: Contact: Address: Phone: FAX: E-Mail: KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC Ben Johnson 767 Eustis St (612) 326-9506 benjamin.johnson@kimley-horn.com CIVIL CONSULTANT St. Paul, MN, 55114 Name: Contact: Address: Phone: FAX: E-Mail: BKBM ENGINEERS, INC Anthony Radtke 6120 Earle Brown Drive, Suite 700 (763 843-0460 aradtke@bkbm.com STRUCTURAL CONSULTANT Minneapolis, MN 55430 Name: Contact: Address: Phone: FAX: E-Mail: JULEE QUARVE-PETERSON, INC 6345 Vincent Ave S (612) 709-2379 JQP_INC@yahoo.com ACCESSIBILITY CONSULTANT Minneapolis, MN 55423 Name: Contact: Address: Phone: FAX: E-Mail: GREYSTAR Bell Plaza Bloomington, MN 55431 (312) 205-6500 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3800 American Blvd W #950 JayScott@solomonre.com No. Date Description Sheet Index Number Sheet Name General G000 Cover Civil C300 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan - Phase 1 C301 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan - Phase 2 C400 Site Plan C401 Access Plan C500 Grading and Drainage Plan C600 Utility Plan Landscape L100 Overall Site Layout Plan L300 Landscape Plan Architectural A001 Architectural Site Plan A011 Site Details A101 Level 1 Floor Plan A102 Level 2 Floor Plan A103 Level 3 Floor Plan A106 Level 6 Floor Plan A301 Building Elevations A302 Building Elevations DD D D D D D D DDD D A C C C C C C C E E E E E 4.85% 0.86 %3.24%2.26% 2.10%0.76%1.06%8.33%1.77 % 1.6 8 % SITE DISCHARGE VIKING DRIVE STORM SEWER NORTH EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES 1. ALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BEINSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE BASINS PRIOR TO SITE GRADING. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CATCH BASIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. 4. WITHIN ONE WEEK (7 DAYS) OF SITE GRADING, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SEED, SOD, OR ROCK BASE. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR MATERIALS. 5. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED INACCORDANCE WITH CITY, STATE, AND WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDINGTHE REMOVAL OF SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES DURING THE DURATION OF THECONSTRUCTION. 7. ANY EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED BASINS SHALL BE REMOVED BY THECONTRACTOR. 8. REMOVAL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTOEXISTING STREETS AND PAVED AREAS AND SHALL SWEEP ADJACENT STREETS ASNECESSARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. 10. IF BLOWING DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY WATERFROM A TANK TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS. UPON IMPLEMENTATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE FOLLOWING AREAS: TRAILER,PARKING, LAYDOWN, PORTA-POTTY, WHEEL WASH, CONCRETE WASHOUT, FUELAND MATERIAL STORAGE CONTAINERS, SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS, ETC., IMMEDIATELY DENOTE THEM ON THE SITE MAPS AND NOTE ANY CHANGES IN LOCATION AS THEY OCCUR THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. BMP AND EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION SEQUENCE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 1. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT EXISTING STORMWATER CULVERTS.2. CONSTRUCT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (1), CONCRETE WASHOUTPIT (1) AND INSTALL SILT FENCE.3. PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA.4. CONSTRUCT AND STABILIZE DIVERSIONS AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPS. 5. PERFORM CLEARING AND GRUBBING OF THE SITE. PERFORM MASS GRADING.ROUGH GRADE TO ESTABLISH PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERNS.6. START CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING PAD AND STRUCTURES. 7. TEMPORARILY SEED WITH PURE LIVE SEED, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION,DISTURBED AREAS THAT WILL BE INACTIVE FOR 7 DAYS OR MORE OR ASREQUIRED BY NPDES AND/OR CITY OF EDINA GRADING PERMIT. SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION: ROCK ENTRANCE INLET PROTECTION FILTER LOG LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SAFETY FENCE LEGEND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMProject Information Project No.: Drawn By: Designed By: Date: Checked By:Scale: Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMITAPPLICATION No. Date Description 160000000 06/16/2021 AS NOTED BPG BPG WDM DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA. MNLIC. NO. WILLIAM D. MATZEK 6/16/2021 45790 KEYNOTE LEGEND CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FILTER LOG, OFFSET FROM FROM BACK OF CURB/PROPERTY LINE FOR CLARITY INLET PROTECTION CONSTRUCTION SAFETY FENCE A B C D E ESTIMATED BMP QUANTITIES BMP UNIT QUANTITY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA.1 FILTER LOG LF 1,281 INLET PROTECTION EA.12 SAFETY FENCE LF 1,382 C300 EROSION AND SEDIMENTCONTROL PLAN - PHASE 1 URBAN LAND UDORTHENTS, WET SUBSTRATUM, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES URBAN LAND-UDIPSAMMENTS(CUT AND FILL LAND)COMPLEX, 0 TO 2 PERCENTSLOPES SOIL BOUNDARY PROPOSED BUILDING 54,400 SF FFE: 824.80 VIKING DRIVE COMPUTER AVESHARED DRIVE NO PARKINGC C C C C D D D D D D D D D D E E E E E A A 2.24%10.6 0 % 1. 7 7%1.60% 2.93% 2.89 % 1 . 7 7% 4.17%1.63%1.66%2.62% 821 822823824823 824 82 2 82 3 8 2 4 SITE DISCHARGEVIKING DRIVE STORM SEWER NORTH PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMProject Information Project No.: Drawn By: Designed By: Date: Checked By:Scale: Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMITAPPLICATION No. Date Description 160000000 06/16/2021 AS NOTED BPG BPG WDM DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA. MNLIC. NO. WILLIAM D. MATZEK 6/16/2021 45790 EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES 1. ALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BEINSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE BASINS PRIOR TO SITE GRADING. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CATCH BASIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. 4. WITHIN ONE WEEK (7 DAYS) OF SITE GRADING, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BESTABILIZED WITH SEED, SOD, OR ROCK BASE. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR MATERIALS. 5. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY, STATE, AND WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDINGTHE REMOVAL OF SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES DURING THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION. 7. ANY EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED BASINS SHALL BE REMOVED BY THECONTRACTOR. 8. REMOVAL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTOEXISTING STREETS AND PAVED AREAS AND SHALL SWEEP ADJACENT STREETS AS NECESSARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. 10. IF BLOWING DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY WATERFROM A TANK TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS. UPON IMPLEMENTATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE FOLLOWING AREAS: TRAILER, PARKING, LAYDOWN, PORTA-POTTY, WHEEL WASH, CONCRETE WASHOUT, FUELAND MATERIAL STORAGE CONTAINERS, SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS, ETC.,IMMEDIATELY DENOTE THEM ON THE SITE MAPS AND NOTE ANY CHANGES INLOCATION AS THEY OCCUR THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. BMP AND EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION SEQUENCE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 1. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT EXISTING STORMWATER CULVERTS.2. CONSTRUCT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (1), CONCRETE WASHOUTPIT (1) AND INSTALL SILT FENCE. 3. PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA.4. CONSTRUCT AND STABILIZE DIVERSIONS AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPS.5. PERFORM CLEARING AND GRUBBING OF THE SITE. PERFORM MASS GRADING. ROUGH GRADE TO ESTABLISH PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERNS.6. START CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING PAD AND STRUCTURES.7. TEMPORARILY SEED WITH PURE LIVE SEED, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, DISTURBED AREAS THAT WILL BE INACTIVE FOR 7 DAYS OR MORE OR ASREQUIRED BY NPDES AND/OR CITY OF EDINA GRADING PERMIT. SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION: ROCK ENTRANCE INLET PROTECTION LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SAFETY FENCE LEGEND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET KEYNOTE LEGEND CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FILTER LOG, OFFSET FROM FROM BACK OF CURB/PROPERTY LINE FOR CLARITY INLET PROTECTION CONSTRUCTION SAFETY FENCE A B C D E ESTIMATED BMP QUANTITIES BMP UNIT QUANTITY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA.2 FILTER LOG LF 1,104 INLET PROTECTION EA.10 SAFETY FENCE LF 1,458 C301 EROSION AND SEDIMENTCONTROL PLAN - PHASE 2 FILTER LOG 12.1'306.5'179.5'PROPOSED BUILDING 54,400 SF FFE: 824.80 VIKING DRIVE COMPUTER AVESHARED DRIVE NO PARKING4 PARKING ACCESS W/OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR MAIN ENTRANCE APPROXIMATE STAIR EXIT PROPOSED BIKE ROOM ENTRANCE 21.1'7.9'6.0'18.0' 24'9.0'5.0'6.0'6.0'6.6'5.2'9.4'5.2'24.0'R57' R10' R10' R33'R33' 24' R57' R61' R80' R101' R101' R58' A A A AA B BB B B B B B CC C C C D E F G H H H I I I I I I I I J J J J J J J JJJ J K R15' R33'5.0'3.0'L L L L N LO P P PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT TO BE VACATED Q L BUILDING DATA SUMMARY AREAS PROPOSED PROPERTY 89,725 SF (2.06 AC) BUILDING AREA 54,400 SF (60.6% OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA) PARKING PROPOSED SURFACE PARKING 4 SPACES ADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED 1 STALLS / 1 STALLS PROPERTY SUMMARY PENTAGON APARTMENTS TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 89,725 SF (2.06 AC) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 82,748 SF (7.90 AC) PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 6,977 SF (0.16 AC) TOTAL DISTURBED AREA X,XXX SF (X.X AC) ZONING SUMMARY EXISTING ZONING PUD PROPOSED ZONING PUD PARKING SETBACKS SIDE/REAR = X'ROAD = X' BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT = X'SIDE = X'REAR = X' PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPSOED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY STANDARDS PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK/STAMPED/COLORED LEGEND PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT KEYNOTE LEGEND CONCRETE SIDEWALK DECORATIVE SIDEWALK, SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS MATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTER ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C. STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT LANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS LANDSCAPE CURB, SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT LOADING ZONE B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.) TRANSITION CURB FLAT CURB TRANSFORMER PAD STEPS/STAIRS/RISERS STOP SIGN AND STOP BAR A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM©Project Information Project No.: Drawn By: Designed By: Date: Checked By:Scale: Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMITAPPLICATION No. Date Description 160000000 06/16/2021 AS NOTED BPG BPG WDM DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA. MNLIC. NO. WILLIAM D. MATZEK 6/16/2021 45790 SITE PLAN NOTES 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS AND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXITPORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDINGUTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. 3. ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE <3'> AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE<10'> UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED. 5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED,REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES,STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALLWORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALLCOST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM ASURVEY BY <SURVEYOR>, DATED XX/XX/XXXX. KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OROMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 8. PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARESHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ANDELECTRICAL PLAN. 10. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE ANDUNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESSSPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE. 11. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS. 12. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS. 13. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 14. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. 15. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE <9'> IN WIDTH AND <18'> IN LENGTH UNLESSOTHERWISE INDICATED. 16. THERE ARE <X.XX> ACRES OF WETLAND IMPACTS. 17. FOR OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS, SEE THE <OFFSITE PLANS> IMPROVEMENTS PLANS. NORTH C400 SITE PLAN PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK/STAMPED/COLORED PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK/STAMPED/COLORED PROPOSED BUILDING 54,400 SF FFE: 824.80 VIKING DRIVE COMPUTER AVESHARED DRIVE NO PARKINGADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADAADAADA Lock to Lock Time SU-30 Width Track Steering Angle 4.00 20.00 feet : : : 6.0 8.00 8.00 31.8: 30.00 PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE LEGEND PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM©Project Information Project No.: Drawn By: Designed By: Date: Checked By:Scale: Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMITAPPLICATION No. Date Description 160000000 06/16/2021 AS NOTED BPG BPG WDM DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA. MNLIC. NO. WILLIAM D. MATZEK 6/16/2021 45790 NORTH C401 ACCESS PLAN THE VEHICLE MANEUVERING IDENTIFIED ON THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED USING AUTOTURN SOFTWARE AND DOESNOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT ACTUAL CONDITIONSNOR DOES IT ACCOUNT FOR EXTERNAL FACTORS. THIS ANALYSIS SHOULD NOT BE USED AS THE SOLE BASIS FOR THE CLIENT'S DECISION MAKING ADA ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO BUILDING ENTRANCE, CONTRACTORSHALL VERIFY CROSS SLOPE DOES NOT EXCEED 2% ANDLONGITUDINAL SLOPE DOES NOT EXCEED 5% PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPOSED BUILDING 54,400 SF FFE: 824.80 VIKING DRIVE COMPUTER AVESHARED DRIVE NO PARKINGG:823.46 G:823.22 G:822.84 ME:822.74 ME:823.81 G:822.31 T/G:822.79 ME:822.00 G:822.20 T/G:822.67 ME/G:821.68 823.71 823.41 823.32 821.65 821.38 821.29 ME/T:821.00ME/G:821.46 ME/G:821.36 820.11 820.50 821.09 820.12 821.80 821.80 821.87 ME/T:820.02 ME/T:820.04 ME/T:821.01 821.11 ME/T:821.71 824.08 ME/T:823.94 824.17 ME/T:824.07 823.55 824.80 824.73 824.41 G:824.80 G:824.80 G:823.77 G:823.66 G:824.46 G:824.25 8218228238248228238238238248243.61% 2.90%2.40% 2.15% 2.88% 4.32%4.25%1.52%2.37%1.50%1.50%1. 8 4 % 1.48%1.87%1.24%1.52%1.52%1.50%1.49%18 LF - 18" PVC@ 2.00% 70 LF - 18" PVC @ 0.50% 822.62 822.52 822.62 822.53 824.80 824.80 EXISTING UNDERGROUND CHAMBERS/STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 8228238 2 4 LP:822.20 ST-2 RE:824.37IE:820.85 EIE:820.85 S RD-1IE:821.20 W ST-3RE:821.60IE:820.50 NCONNECT TO EXISTING 18" STORM SEWERFIELD VERIFY INVERT AND LOCATION ST-4 IE:818.20 SWCONNECT TO EXISTING 18" STORM SEWERFIELD VERIFY INVERT AND LOCATION ST-6RE:822.20IE:817.88 NEIE:817.88 SWDOGHOUSE OVER EX. 15" STORM, FIELD VERFIY INVERT AND LOCATION FOUR - 6" RISERS 1.40% 1.51%3.54%1.67%1.59% 1.59% POTENTIAL BIKE ROOM ACCESS DOOR, CURRENT ACCESSIBLE ELEVATION=±821.80 STAIRS REQUIRED TO MEET FFE=824.80 POTENTIAL AMENITY DECK ACCESS DOOR, CURRENT ACCESSIBLE ELEVATION=±822.10 STAIRS REQUIRED TO MEET FFE=824.80 823.92 ME/T:823.78 824.803.01% G:824.19 G:823.74 G:822.08 1.50%ONE - 8" RISER 822.02 821.93 G:822.40 POTENTIAL ACCESS DOOR, CURRENT ACCESSIBLE ELEVATION=±824.00 STAIRS REQUIRED TO MEET FFE=824.80 EOF 2.00%8228 2 3824 821822LP:822.21 823.94 2. 3 5 % 2.16% 1.26% 1.50% 1.33%1.73% 1.50% 1.57% 823 823 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM©Project Information Project No.: Drawn By: Designed By: Date: Checked By:Scale: Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMITAPPLICATION No. Date Description 160000000 06/16/2021 AS NOTED BPG BPG WDM DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA. MNLIC. NO. WILLIAM D. MATZEK 6/16/2021 45790 GRADING PLAN NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF EDINA, SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ <1-800-252-1166> AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-1785STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE PER ASTM 3212PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 4. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THECONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANYDISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TOHELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES.WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THEEXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 8. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 9. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONEDUTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OFTHE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 10. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICELAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION. 11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 12. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF <4" CLASS 5> AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. 13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALLSTREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BERE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF <4" OF TOPSOIL>. 14. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED. 15. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSINGDRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NOCASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINALSIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS ORAISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFYENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TOPAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 16. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. 17. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IFLESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER INLANDSCAPE AREAS. 18. ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX> OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION. 19. ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING MANHOLE CONNECTIONS. 20. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT PLUMBING CODE. 21. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. 22. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB" WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENTDRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER. PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR925 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00 LEGEND PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0 PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION LP:0.0 G:0.00 T:0.00 PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW T/G:0.0 EOF:0.0 0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION 0.00%PROPOSED ADA SLOPE ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET) PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION CO D NORTH C500 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IS PROVIDED ON-SITE THROUGH AN EXISTING UNDERGROUND STORMTECH CHAMBER SYSTEM. PER THE APPROVEDSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR PENTAGON VILLAGE, DATED SEPTEMBER 26, 2018 BY WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (PROJECT # 0013450.00), THE SUBJECT LOT IS PART OF DRAINAGE AREA 13_2B, WHICH IS MANAGED BY CHAMBER SYSTEM #4. THIS DRAINAGE AREA ASSUMED AN IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE AREA OF 93.4% AS PART OF THE ORIGINALLY PROPOSED AND APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLANS. THE CURRENTLY PROPOSED SITE SURFACE AND ROOF DRAINAGE WILL ALSO BE ROUTED TO CHAMER SYSTEM #4. THE CURRENTLY PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE FOR THIS DRAINAGE AREA WILL BE 85.6%. THIS DECREASE IN IMPERVIOUSNESS WILL CONTINUE TO MEET CITY/WATERSHED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS AND PROVIDE AN IMPROVEMENT FROM THE CURRENT CONDITION. A REDUCTION OF RUNOFF RATES AND HIGH WATER LEVEL CAN BE EXPECTED WITH THIS AS WELL AS AN INCREASE IN TP AND TSS REMOVALS FROM THE SITE. STORMWATER WILL BE CONTROLLED AS TO LIMIT IMPACTS ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES THROUGH INTENTIONAL GRADING AND A SERIES BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. SITE GRADING WILL BE DESIGNED TO DIRECT RUNOFF TOWARDS EXISTING AND PROPOSED INLETS ON SITE AND PROVIDE EMERGENCY OVERFLOWS TO THE SURROUNDING ROADWAY/PUBLIC STORM SYSTEM IN VIKING DRIVE. THE FINISHED FLOOR OF THE BUILDING WILL ALSO BE SET AT AN ELEVATION OF 824.80, WHICH PROVIDES 2.1' OF FREEBOARD FROM THE ORIGINALLY MODELLED 100-YR HWL (822.70) OF CHAMBER SYSTEM #4. ADDITIONALLY, BOULEVARDS AROUND THE SITE PERIMETER WILL ACT AS FILTER STRIPS FOR AREAS THAT CANNOT BE CAPTURED AND DIRECTLY ROUTED TO THE UNDERGROUND SYSTEM. STORMWATER MANAGMENT NARRATIVE PROPOSED BUILDING 54,400 SF FFE: 824.80 VIKING DRIVE COMPUTER AVESHARED DRIVE NO PARKINGCONNECT EX 10" PVC SANITARY TO BUILDING PLUMBING, COORD WITH MEP. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EX INVERT AND LOCATION IE: 811.90 6" DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE, CONNECT TO BUILDING PLUMBING, COORD WITH MEP. FDC RELOCATED FIRE HYDRANTAND GATE VALVE ASSEMBLY 6" DIP HYDRANT LEAD WETTAP EXISTING WATERMAIN PROPOSED TRANSFORMER PROPOSED POWER SERVICE,COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROPOSED COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE, COORDINATE WITH UTILITY EXISTING 10" WATERMAIN EXISTING 10" PVC SANITARY EXISTING UNDERGROUND CHAMBERS/ STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 74.3' 8" FIRE WATER SERVICE, CONNECT TO BUILDING PLUMBING,COORD WITH MEP. CONNECT TO EXISTING 10" WATERMAIN W/ WET TAP AND 6" VALVE EXISTING 8" WATERMAIN CONNECT TO EXISTING 10" WATERMAIN W/ WET TAP AND 8" VALVE EXISTING 10" WATERMAIN PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM©Project Information Project No.: Drawn By: Designed By: Date: Checked By:Scale: Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMITAPPLICATION No. Date Description 160000000 06/16/2021 AS NOTED BPG BPG WDM DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA. MNLIC. NO. WILLIAM D. MATZEK 6/16/2021 45790 UTILITY PLAN NOTES 1. ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE, AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION OFPROPOSED UTILITIES. 2. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:8" PVC SDR35 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES LESS THAN 12' DEEP 8" PVC SDR26 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES MORE THAN 12' DEEP6" PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D-1785DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 3. WATER LINES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:6" AND LARGER, PVC C-900 PER ASTM D 2241CLASS 200 UNDER COUNTY ROADS, OTHERWISE CLASS 150 4" AND LARGER DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150SMALLER THAN 3" PIPING SHALL BE COPPER TUBE TYPE "K" PERANSI 816.22 OR PVC, 200 P.S.I., PER ASTM D1784 AND D2241. 4. MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET. 5. ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUSTBLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR AS INDICATED IN THECITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 6. ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN (10') APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING 18"VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE OR STRUCTURE). 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7'-5" COVER ON ALL WATERLINES. 8.IN THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES,STORM LINES AND GAS LINES, OR ANY OBSTRUCTION (EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THE SANITARY LINE SHALL BE SCH. 40 OR C900 WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEETON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVEMECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 ORANSI 21.11 (AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50). 9. LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFOREBACKFILLING. 10. TOPS OF MANHOLES SHALL BE RAISED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSEDPAVEMENT ELEVATIONS, AND TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS, INGREEN AREAS, WITH WATERTIGHT LIDS. 11. ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSIONSTRENGTH AT 3000 P.S.I. 12. EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY NEWLINES. 13. REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES. 14. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITYOF EDINA AND/OR STATE OF MN WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION OFTHE WATER AND SEWER LINES. 15. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATIONOF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THEVARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THECONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURSBEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIESWHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 16. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/ORCERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES. 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATIONREQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ANDELECTRICAL PLAN. 19. BACKFLOW DEVICES (DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) AND METERS ARE LOCATED IN THEINTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. REF. ARCH / MEP PLANS. 20. ALL ONSITE WATERMAINS AND SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED ANDMAINTAINED. 21. ALL WATERMAIN STUBOUTS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED WITH REACTIONBLOCKING. NORTH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN GATE VALVE HYDRANT TEE REDUCER UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TELEPHONE GAS MAIN STORM SEWER LEGEND CO SANITARY CLEANOUTCO EXISTING PROPOSED 0' 5'10' 20'40'12' - 0"21' - 0"16' - 3 69/128" PARKING GARAGE 1 1 1 STORMWATER SYSTEM BELOW GRADE 2 3 4 22 PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE LOADING ZONE VIKING DRIVE COMPUTER AVENUE2 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 PARKING STALLS (4) 5 TRANSFORMER PARKING GARAGE ENTRY FRONT ENTRY LOUNGE/FLEX SPACE ENTRY LEVEL 2 AMENITY DECK LEVEL 2 AMENITY DECK Materials -Floors (Plans) CONCRETE - TYPE 1 PEDESTAL PAVER - TYPE 1 GRASS ASPHALT HARDWOOD MULCH ROCK MULCH CONCRETE - TYPE 2 PEDESTAL PAVER - TYPE 2 PAVER TYPE 1 WOOD ARTIFICIAL GRASS AMENITY DECK Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Project Information Project No.:PIC / AIC: Date:Phase: Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 6/16/2021 1:18:38 PMBIM 360://21-0068 - RISE and Solomon Real Estate Group - PentagonApartments/LAND-21-0068_PentagonApartments-Central_mjones@cuningham.com.rvtOverall Site Layout Plan L100 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 21-0068 06/16/2021DD JS PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMIT APPLICATION N L100 1" = 20'-0" 1 Overall Site Layout Plan KEYNOTE LEGEND Circle Remark 1 Metal Raised Planter Bed 2 Public Art Piece - TBD 3 Dog Run - Fenced/K9 Grass 4 Bike Racks 5 Monument Sign No. Date Description 0' 5'10' 20'40' • PLANT SCHEDULE TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER PLAN IF DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST. SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER NOTES. • CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE SITE FOR DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANT MATERIAL SELECTIONS AND OTHER SITE CONDITIONS WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL OR WARRANTY. UNDESIRABLE PLANT MATERIAL SELECTIONS OR SITE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORK. • NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVAL IS REQUESTED OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BID AND/OR QUOTATION. • CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR LAYOUT AND STAKING OF PLANT MATERIAL. MATERIAL SHALL BE LOCATED AND STAKED AS SHOWN ON PLAN(S). ALL STAKING AND BASE GRADING TO BE VERIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN FIELD PRIOR TO ANY FINAL SURFACE MATERIAL INSTALLATIONS. • ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS MAY BE NEEDED IN FIELD. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO ADJUSTMENT OF PLANTS. • NO PLANTS WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL FINAL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAVE BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. • PLANT MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PER PLANTING DETAILS. • CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING INSTALLATION WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS WORKING ON SITE. • KEEP FINAL ELEVATIONS OF SOIL AND MULCH FROM BLOCKING INTENDED STORM WATER FLOW. SEE CIVIL AND/OR LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR GRADING PLAN. • SALVAGE TOPSOIL FOR REUSE FROM THE EARTHWORK AREAS AS APPROPRIATE AND/OR AS DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND STOCKPILE IN LOCATION APPROVED BY OWNER. PROJECT MANAGER TO REVIEW, DIRECT AND APPROVE ALL REQUIRED SOIL CORRECTIONS PRIOR TO BASE MATERIAL PLACEMENT. • CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT SOIL CONDITIONS AND COMPACTION ARE ADEQUATE TO ALLOW FOR PROPER DRAINAGE OF THE PROJECT SITE. UNDESIRABLE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORK. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE PROPER SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE IN ALL AREAS. • UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED SO THAT TRENCHES DO NOT CUT THROUGH ROOT SYSTEMS OF ANY EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. • EDGE AREAS WHERE TURF/SOD MEET PLANTING BEDS AS SHOWN IN PLANS AND AS DESCRIBED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. • SOD AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING SHALL BE REPLACED, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. • WHERE SOD ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF SOD/SEED SHALL BE HELD 1" BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL, SLAB, CURB, ETC. • SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTS. ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR IN DRAINAGE SWALES, SOD SHALL BE STAKED SECURELY. • CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ONGOING MAINTENANCE SUCH AS WATERING AND WEEDING OF NEWLY INSTALLED MATERIALS, AND REPLACEMENTS, FOR ENTIRE WARRANTY PERIOD. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO OWNER ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. • ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHOULD BE NOENICITINOID-FREE.12' - 0"21' - 0"16' - 3 69/128"STORMWATER SYSTEM BELOW GRADE ACF 1 CEO 1 ACF 1 CEO 1 ACF 1 CEO 1 ACF 1 CEO 1 ACF 1 CEO 1 ACF 1 CEO 1 CEO 1 POT 2 LEVEL 2 AMENITY DECK LEVEL 2 AMENITY DECK Materials -Planting GRASS - SPRAY IRRIGATION PLANTING BEDS - DRIP IRRIGATION AMENITY DECK Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Project Information Project No.:PIC / AIC: Date:Phase: Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 6/16/2021 1:19:53 PMBIM 360://21-0068 - RISE and Solomon Real Estate Group - PentagonApartments/LAND-21-0068_PentagonApartments-Central_mjones@cuningham.com.rvtLandscape Plan L300 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 21-0068 06/16/2021DD JS PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMIT APPLICATION N Planting Notes L300 1" = 20'-0" 1 Overall Planting Plan Master Planting Schedule Type Mark Common Name Botanical Name Quantity Installed Size Coniferous Tree TAC Japanese Upright Yew Taxus cuspidata 'Capitata'6 6' BB Deciduous Tree ACF Autumn Blaze Maple Acer × freemanii 'Jeffersred' 6 2.5" BB CAC Firespire American Hornbeam Carpinus caroliniana 'J.N. Upright' 2 2.5" BB CEO Hackberry Celtis occidentalis 7 2.5" BB POT Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides 2 2.5" BB Grasses CAA Karl Foerster calamagrostis acutiflora 265 #3 CONT PAV Switchgrass 'Heavy Metal' Panicum virgatum 'Heavy Metal' 510 #1 CONT SCS Little Bluestem 'Minn Blue" Schizachyrium scoparium 323 #2 CONT Perennial ECP Powwow White Coneflower Echinacea purpurea 'Powwow White' 103 #1 CONT SAN Salvia Caradonna Salvia nemorosa caradonna 249 #2 CONT Shrub - Coniferous JUC Sea Green Juniper Juniperus chinensis 'Sea Green' 21 #5 CONT Shrub - Deciduous COS Firedance Dogwood Cornus sericea 'Bailadeline' 1 #5 CONT RHA Gro-low Fragrant Sumac Rhus aromatica 'Gro-Low'8 #5 CONT RHO P.J.M. Rhododendron Rhododendron x 'P.J.M' (H-1) 14 #5 CONT Vines HAP Climbing Honeysuckle Hydrangea anomala subsp. petiolaris 17 #1 CONT No. Date Description 12' - 0"21' - 0"16' - 3 69/128" ENTRY ELEV ELEV ELEV STAIR STAIR BIKE ENTRY 1. ALL DIMENSIONS TO THE PROPERTY LINE SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE FACE OF EXTERIOR FINISH WHILE ALL GRID LINES AT EXTERIOR WALLS ARE ON THE FACE OF THE EXTERIOR STRUCTURE.2. ALL INTERIOR BEARING WALLS (SEE STRUCTURAL DRWAINGS FOR LOCATIONS), SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH 1 HOUR BARRIER3. PROVIDE CLASS I STANDPIPES PER SECTION 905 WITH 2 1/2" OUTLET IN STAIR SHAFTS AT EACH STAIR LANDING4. ALL STEEL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS, COLUMNS AND BEAMS, SHALL RECEIVE FIREPROOFING SPRAY PER RATING REQUIREMENT SHOWN ON R0045. SEE ENLARGED STAIR PLAN FOR LOCATION OF STANDPIPES6. PROVIDE OVERFLOW DRAIN WHERE AREA/FLOOR DRAIN IS SHOWN AS REQUIRED.7. ALL ROOF DRAINS TO FLOW TO STORMWATER PLANTERS, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS8. FINISH GRADE AT COURT YARDS, PORDIUM, PATIO AND BALCONY SHALL BE 2% MAX AT ALL DIRECTIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE PLAN.9. SEE LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR SITE WORK ADDITIONAL NOTES FOR ELECTRICAL VEHICLE SUPPLY EQUIPMENT (EVSE) 1. A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PLAN CHECK IS REQUIRED TO VERIFY THE RACEWAY METHOD(s), WIRING SCHEMATICS AND ELECTRICAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE ELECTRICAL CHARGING SYSTEM" 2. THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM SHALL HAVE SUFFICIENT CAPACITY TO SIMULTANEOUSLY CHARGE ALL ELECTRICAL VEHICALS AT THEIR FULL RATED AMPERAGE 3. A LABEL STATING "EV CAPABLE" SHALL BE POSTED IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE AT THE SERVICE PANEL OR SUBPANEL AND NEXT TO THE RACEWAY TERMINATION POINT" P.A. TO CONFIRM IF OVERFLOW DRAIN IS REQUIRED EDITOR'S NOTE: WORK POINT WP Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Project Information Project No.:PIC / AIC: Date:Phase: Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 6/16/2021 4:43:40 PMBIM 360://21-0068 - RISE and Solomon Real Estate Group - Pentagon Apartments/21-0068_Pentagon_Apartments.rvtArchitectural Site Plan A001 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 21-0068 06/16/2021DD JS PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMIT APPLICATION A001 1" = 20'-0" 1 Architectural Site Site Plan Notes N PULL IN PARKING LEGEND AS REQUIRED PER PROJECT EDITOR'S NOTE: Site Plan Graphic Symobls Keynote Legend No. Date Description Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Project Information Project No.:PIC / AIC: Date:Phase: Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 6/16/2021 4:56:40 PMBIM 360://21-0068 - RISE and Solomon Real Estate Group - Pentagon Apartments/21-0068_Pentagon_Apartments.rvtSite Details A011 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 21-0068 06/16/2021DD JS PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMIT APPLICATION No. Date Description SITE - LOT 3 SITE - LOT 3 1A3022 A3012A3021 A301 1 A401 1 A401 2 A401 2 A401 TRASHAPPROX 1600 SF MAILAPPROX 325 SFRR RR PUBLIC VENUE APPROX 875 SF PACKAGESAPPROX 300 SF LOBBY APPROX 2400 SF CONF APPROX 240 SF NORTHERN PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE TO CONTINUE TO BE EXPLORED AND REFINED PER CLIENTS MOST RECENT FEEDBACK LEASINGAPPROX 400 SF LOUNGE / FLEX SPACE APPROX 600 SF WASH APPROX 150 SF BIKE STORAGE APPROX 530 SF PARKING 152 STALLS181' - 6"312'-0" PRIMARY LOBBY ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE LOUNGE ENTRANCE STAIR EXIT 1. ALL MASONRY DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL.2. CONCRETE AND CMU WALLS WITH ADDITIONAL FINISHES ARE DIMENSIONED TO FACE OF STUD.3. ALL EXTERIOR STEEL STUD AND WOOD STUD WALL SYSTEMS ARE DIMENSIONED TO EXTERIOR FACE OF STUD.4. ALL INTERIOR STEEL STUD AND WOOD STUD PARTITIONS ARE DIMENSIONED TO FACE OF SHEATHING OR CENTERLINE OF STUD, WHERE INDICATED BY 'CL' SYMBOL.5. WINDOWS ARE DIMENSIONED EITHER TO CENTERLINE OF WINDOW OR EDGE OF FRAME. 6. REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ALL SITE FEATURES INCLUDING SITE WALLS, PLANTERS, SEATING, FLOOR/PAVING FINISHES, AND COURTYARD AND POOL DECK EQUIPMENT AND OTHER AMENITIES. 7. ALL LEVEL 1 EXTERIOR WALLS (EXCLUDING CMU AND CONCRETE) SHALL BE (WALL TYPE) UNLESS TAGGED OTHERWISE ON 1/8" PLANS AND/OR ENLARGED PLANS. ALSO SEE THE WALL SECTIONS. 8. ALL LEVEL 2 THRU 6 EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE (WALL TYPE) UNLESS TAGGED OTHERWISE ON 1/8" PLANS AND/OR ENLARGED PLANS. ALSO SEE THE WALL SECTIONS. 9. SEE UNIT PLANS FOR MORE INFORMATION. 10. PROVIDE FIRE RETARDENT PLYWOOD AT FULL BACK WALL OF ALL IDF CLOSETS. 11. ALL DOORS SHALL BE LOCATED 6" FROM ADJACENT WALL TO EDGE OF DOOR, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 12. PROVIDE PANIC HARDWARE AND EXIT SIGNS FOR ALL EXIT DOORS AS INDICATED ON EXIT PLANS.13. VERIFY ALL THE SHAFT SIZES SHOWN ON PLANS WITH VENDORS AND EQUIPMENT. NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF NECESSARY CHANGES IN SHAFT DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.14. FOR SIGNAGE DETAILS SEE R301 & R302.15. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE 1HR RATED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE IN THE WALL SYSTEM TAG.16. SPRAY APPLIED FIREPROOFING TO BE PROVIDED AT ALL STEEL COLUMN & BEAMS, EXCEPT WHERE INTUMESCENT PAINT IS REQUIRED AT EXPOSED STEEL OR WHERE 3/4" OR LESS SPACE IS PROVIDED FOR FIREPROOFING. SEE RATING REQUIRED ON SHEET R001.17. DECK AREA DRAINS SHALL BE LOCATED IN AN APPROXIMATE LOCATION AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN WITH SLOPE APPROX. 1/8" PER FOOT AND NO MORE THAN 1/4" PER FOOT. COORDINATE THE LOCATION IN FIELD. Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Project Information Project No.:PIC / AIC: Date:Phase: Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 6/16/2021 4:43:42 PMBIM 360://21-0068 - RISE and Solomon Real Estate Group - Pentagon Apartments/21-0068_Pentagon_Apartments.rvtLevel 1 Floor Plan A101 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 21-0068 06/16/2021DD JS PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMIT APPLICATION Level 1 1 2 3 4 Keyplan Floor Plan General Notes Keynote Legend N No. Date Description 1. ALL MASONRY DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL.2. CONCRETE AND CMU WALLS WITH ADDITIONAL FINISHES ARE DIMENSIONED TO FACE OF STUD.3. ALL EXTERIOR STEEL STUD AND WOOD STUD WALL SYSTEMS ARE DIMENSIONED TO EXTERIOR FACE OF STUD.4. ALL INTERIOR STEEL STUD AND WOOD STUD PARTITIONS ARE DIMENSIONED TO FACE OF SHEATHING OR CENTERLINE OF STUD, WHERE INDICATED BY 'CL' SYMBOL.5. WINDOWS ARE DIMENSIONED EITHER TO CENTERLINE OF WINDOW OR EDGE OF FRAME. 6. REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ALL SITE FEATURES INCLUDING SITE WALLS, PLANTERS, SEATING, FLOOR/PAVING FINISHES, AND COURTYARD AND POOL DECK EQUIPMENT AND OTHER AMENITIES. 7. ALL LEVEL 1 EXTERIOR WALLS (EXCLUDING CMU AND CONCRETE) SHALL BE (WALL TYPE) UNLESS TAGGED OTHERWISE ON 1/8" PLANS AND/OR ENLARGED PLANS. ALSO SEE THE WALL SECTIONS. 8. ALL LEVEL 2 THRU 6 EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE (WALL TYPE) UNLESS TAGGED OTHERWISE ON 1/8" PLANS AND/OR ENLARGED PLANS. ALSO SEE THE WALL SECTIONS. 9. SEE UNIT PLANS FOR MORE INFORMATION. 10. PROVIDE FIRE RETARDENT PLYWOOD AT FULL BACK WALL OF ALL IDF CLOSETS. 11. ALL DOORS SHALL BE LOCATED 6" FROM ADJACENT WALL TO EDGE OF DOOR, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 12. PROVIDE PANIC HARDWARE AND EXIT SIGNS FOR ALL EXIT DOORS AS INDICATED ON EXIT PLANS.13. VERIFY ALL THE SHAFT SIZES SHOWN ON PLANS WITH VENDORS AND EQUIPMENT. NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF NECESSARY CHANGES IN SHAFT DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.14. FOR SIGNAGE DETAILS SEE R301 & R302.15. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE 1HR RATED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE IN THE WALL SYSTEM TAG.16. SPRAY APPLIED FIREPROOFING TO BE PROVIDED AT ALL STEEL COLUMN & BEAMS, EXCEPT WHERE INTUMESCENT PAINT IS REQUIRED AT EXPOSED STEEL OR WHERE 3/4" OR LESS SPACE IS PROVIDED FOR FIREPROOFING. SEE RATING REQUIRED ON SHEET R001.17. DECK AREA DRAINS SHALL BE LOCATED IN AN APPROXIMATE LOCATION AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN WITH SLOPE APPROX. 1/8" PER FOOT AND NO MORE THAN 1/4" PER FOOT. COORDINATE THE LOCATION IN FIELD.1A3022 A3012A3021 A301 1 A401 1 A401 2 A401 2 A401 FITNESS APPROX 650 SF STUDIO APPROX 130 SF RR RR CLUBROOM APPROX 1100 SF STORAGE APPROX 250 SF CORRIDOR B2B2 B2B2 B2B2 B2B2 A4 A4 A4 E1 A3 A2 A2 A3 A3 A2 A2 A3 E2 A4 A4 B1 B1 A2 A2 A2A2 E3 E3 A3 A3 A3 A3 E4 AMENITY DECK MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL EXIT181' - 6"318'-0" Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Project Information Project No.:PIC / AIC: Date:Phase: Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 6/16/2021 4:43:44 PMBIM 360://21-0068 - RISE and Solomon Real Estate Group - Pentagon Apartments/21-0068_Pentagon_Apartments.rvtLevel 2 Floor Plan A102 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 21-0068 06/16/2021DD JS PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMIT APPLICATION 1 2 3 4 Keyplan Floor Plan General Notes Keynote Legend Level 2 N No. Date Description 1A3022 A3012A3021 A301 1 A401 1 A401 2 A401 2 A401 B2B2 B2B2 B2B2 B2B2 A4 A4 A4 E1 A3 A2 A2 A3 A3 A2 A2 A3 E2 A4 A4 B1 B1 A2 A2 A2A2 E3 E3 A3 A3 A3 A3 E4A2A2A3A3 181' - 6"318'-0" 1. ALL MASONRY DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL.2. CONCRETE AND CMU WALLS WITH ADDITIONAL FINISHES ARE DIMENSIONED TO FACE OF STUD.3. ALL EXTERIOR STEEL STUD AND WOOD STUD WALL SYSTEMS ARE DIMENSIONED TO EXTERIOR FACE OF STUD.4. ALL INTERIOR STEEL STUD AND WOOD STUD PARTITIONS ARE DIMENSIONED TO FACE OF SHEATHING OR CENTERLINE OF STUD, WHERE INDICATED BY 'CL' SYMBOL.5. WINDOWS ARE DIMENSIONED EITHER TO CENTERLINE OF WINDOW OR EDGE OF FRAME. 6. REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ALL SITE FEATURES INCLUDING SITE WALLS, PLANTERS, SEATING, FLOOR/PAVING FINISHES, AND COURTYARD AND POOL DECK EQUIPMENT AND OTHER AMENITIES. 7. ALL LEVEL 1 EXTERIOR WALLS (EXCLUDING CMU AND CONCRETE) SHALL BE (WALL TYPE) UNLESS TAGGED OTHERWISE ON 1/8" PLANS AND/OR ENLARGED PLANS. ALSO SEE THE WALL SECTIONS. 8. ALL LEVEL 2 THRU 6 EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE (WALL TYPE) UNLESS TAGGED OTHERWISE ON 1/8" PLANS AND/OR ENLARGED PLANS. ALSO SEE THE WALL SECTIONS. 9. SEE UNIT PLANS FOR MORE INFORMATION. 10. PROVIDE FIRE RETARDENT PLYWOOD AT FULL BACK WALL OF ALL IDF CLOSETS. 11. ALL DOORS SHALL BE LOCATED 6" FROM ADJACENT WALL TO EDGE OF DOOR, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 12. PROVIDE PANIC HARDWARE AND EXIT SIGNS FOR ALL EXIT DOORS AS INDICATED ON EXIT PLANS.13. VERIFY ALL THE SHAFT SIZES SHOWN ON PLANS WITH VENDORS AND EQUIPMENT. NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF NECESSARY CHANGES IN SHAFT DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.14. FOR SIGNAGE DETAILS SEE R301 & R302.15. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE 1HR RATED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE IN THE WALL SYSTEM TAG.16. SPRAY APPLIED FIREPROOFING TO BE PROVIDED AT ALL STEEL COLUMN & BEAMS, EXCEPT WHERE INTUMESCENT PAINT IS REQUIRED AT EXPOSED STEEL OR WHERE 3/4" OR LESS SPACE IS PROVIDED FOR FIREPROOFING. SEE RATING REQUIRED ON SHEET R001.17. DECK AREA DRAINS SHALL BE LOCATED IN AN APPROXIMATE LOCATION AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN WITH SLOPE APPROX. 1/8" PER FOOT AND NO MORE THAN 1/4" PER FOOT. COORDINATE THE LOCATION IN FIELD. Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Project Information Project No.:PIC / AIC: Date:Phase: Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 6/16/2021 4:43:45 PMBIM 360://21-0068 - RISE and Solomon Real Estate Group - Pentagon Apartments/21-0068_Pentagon_Apartments.rvtLevel 3 Floor Plan A103 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 21-0068 06/16/2021DD JS PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMIT APPLICATION Level 3 - Level 5 TYP 1 2 3 4 Keyplan Floor Plan General Notes Keynote Legend N No. Date Description 1. ALL MASONRY DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL.2. CONCRETE AND CMU WALLS WITH ADDITIONAL FINISHES ARE DIMENSIONED TO FACE OF STUD.3. ALL EXTERIOR STEEL STUD AND WOOD STUD WALL SYSTEMS ARE DIMENSIONED TO EXTERIOR FACE OF STUD.4. ALL INTERIOR STEEL STUD AND WOOD STUD PARTITIONS ARE DIMENSIONED TO FACE OF SHEATHING OR CENTERLINE OF STUD, WHERE INDICATED BY 'CL' SYMBOL.5. WINDOWS ARE DIMENSIONED EITHER TO CENTERLINE OF WINDOW OR EDGE OF FRAME. 6. REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ALL SITE FEATURES INCLUDING SITE WALLS, PLANTERS, SEATING, FLOOR/PAVING FINISHES, AND COURTYARD AND POOL DECK EQUIPMENT AND OTHER AMENITIES. 7. ALL LEVEL 1 EXTERIOR WALLS (EXCLUDING CMU AND CONCRETE) SHALL BE (WALL TYPE) UNLESS TAGGED OTHERWISE ON 1/8" PLANS AND/OR ENLARGED PLANS. ALSO SEE THE WALL SECTIONS. 8. ALL LEVEL 2 THRU 6 EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE (WALL TYPE) UNLESS TAGGED OTHERWISE ON 1/8" PLANS AND/OR ENLARGED PLANS. ALSO SEE THE WALL SECTIONS. 9. SEE UNIT PLANS FOR MORE INFORMATION. 10. PROVIDE FIRE RETARDENT PLYWOOD AT FULL BACK WALL OF ALL IDF CLOSETS. 11. ALL DOORS SHALL BE LOCATED 6" FROM ADJACENT WALL TO EDGE OF DOOR, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 12. PROVIDE PANIC HARDWARE AND EXIT SIGNS FOR ALL EXIT DOORS AS INDICATED ON EXIT PLANS.13. VERIFY ALL THE SHAFT SIZES SHOWN ON PLANS WITH VENDORS AND EQUIPMENT. NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF NECESSARY CHANGES IN SHAFT DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.14. FOR SIGNAGE DETAILS SEE R301 & R302.15. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE 1HR RATED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE IN THE WALL SYSTEM TAG.16. SPRAY APPLIED FIREPROOFING TO BE PROVIDED AT ALL STEEL COLUMN & BEAMS, EXCEPT WHERE INTUMESCENT PAINT IS REQUIRED AT EXPOSED STEEL OR WHERE 3/4" OR LESS SPACE IS PROVIDED FOR FIREPROOFING. SEE RATING REQUIRED ON SHEET R001.17. DECK AREA DRAINS SHALL BE LOCATED IN AN APPROXIMATE LOCATION AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN WITH SLOPE APPROX. 1/8" PER FOOT AND NO MORE THAN 1/4" PER FOOT. COORDINATE THE LOCATION IN FIELD.1A3022A3021 A301 1 A401 1 A401 2 A401 2 A401 OUTDOOR SUN DECKAPPROX 640 SF(OR POTENTIAL LOCATION FOR A UNIT) RR INDOOR SUN DECKAPPROX 280 SF(OR POTENTIAL LOCATION FOR A UNIT) B2B2 B2B2 B2B2 B2B2 A4 A4 A4 E1 A3 A2 A2 A3 A3 A2 A2 A3 E2 A4 A4 B1 B1 A2 A2 A2A2 E3 E3 A3 A3 A3 A3 E4A2 A2 A3A3 181' - 6"318'-0" Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Project Information Project No.:PIC / AIC: Date:Phase: Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 6/16/2021 4:43:46 PMBIM 360://21-0068 - RISE and Solomon Real Estate Group - Pentagon Apartments/21-0068_Pentagon_Apartments.rvtLevel 6 Floor Plan A106 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 21-0068 06/16/2021DD JS PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMIT APPLICATION 1 2 3 4 Keyplan Floor Plan General Notes A106 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 Level 6 Keynote Legend N No. Date Description Pentagon Apartments - Daytime Render From the North West 06/15/21 Pentagon Apartments - Daytime Render From the South East 06/15/21 Pentagon Apartments - Night Time Render From the North West 06/15/21 File #227702810 July 7, 2021 DRAFT Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Maple Plain, MN 55359 Phone: 7963-479-4200 Fax: 763-479-4242 Prepared for: City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Traffic and Parking Study for 4911 77th Street W in Edina, MN July 2021 i DRAFT Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................... I 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................... 1-1 2.0 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND ........................................................... 2-1 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................... 3-1 4.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTS ........................................................................ 4-1 5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................... 5-1 6.0 PARKING ANALYSIS ......................................................................... 6-1 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................... 7-1 8.0 APPENDIX ........................................................................................ 8-1 FIGURES FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................. 2-2 FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN ................................................................................ 2-3 FIGURE 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................. 3-3 FIGURE 4 WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES ................................................ 4-3 FIGURE 5 WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR LOS RESULTS .......................................... 5-5 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. __________________________________ DATE: July 7, 2021 Edward F. Terhaar License No. 24441 July 2021 1-1 DRAFT 1.0 Executive Summary The purpose of this Traffic and Parking Study is to evaluate the impacts of the proposed new residential building located at 4911 77th Street W. in Edina, MN. The project site is located in the northwest quadrant of the Computer Avenue/Viking Drive intersection. The proposed project location is currently vacant land within the previously approved Pentagon South development. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development at the following intersections: • 77th Street W./Parklawn Avenue • 77th Street W./Computer Avenue • 77th Street/development access • 77th Street W./TH 100 NB ramp • Edina Industrial Blvd/TH 100 SB ramp • Computer Avenue/development access The proposed project will involve constructing a new apartment building with 200 dwelling units. The project is expected to include 157 on-site parking stalls. The project will also use stalls in the adjacent parking ramp. As shown in the site plan, the site has access to the internal street system within the Pentagon South development. The project is expected to be completed in 2023. The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to add 72 net trips during the a.m. peak hour, 88 net trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 1,088 net trips daily. Net trips account for new trips generated by the development and trips eliminated by removal of the existing office space. • The net trips added to the roadway system by the proposed development are expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. No improvements are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. • Traffic volume data collected for previous studies in this area was used at all intersections to avoid traffic volume reductions that have occurred due to the COVID-19 pandemic impacts. This process resulted in reasonable estimates for the weekday peak hours that would occur under non-pandemic conditions. • Future plans for this area include a new primary sidewalk on 77th Street. Future plans for this area also include a conventional bike lane on 77th Street. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. • The project owner is encouraged to provide bicycle parking spaces to promote bicycle use by residents. Long-term spaces for residents within the building and outside racks for short-term parking are recommended. The provision of a bicycle July 2021 1-2 DRAFT maintenance station will also help encourage bicycle use by residents. • Based on the ITE data, the peak weekday parking demand for the overall site 262 spaces. The 157 spaces on-site are 105 spaces less than the expected peak parking demand. • The current City parking ordinance is 2 stalls per unit, which equates to 400 stalls. The proposed draft parking ordinance that is in front of the City Council is 1.25 stalls per unit, which equates to 250 stalls. • The expected parking demand for the first phase of office space (19,000 square feet) and a 235 room hotel within Pentagon South was calculated to be 177 spaces from 6-8 a.m. Combining this peak demand with the portion of the apartment peak demand that would use the parking ramp (105 spaces) results in a total demand of 282 spaces. This peak demand is 141 spaces less than the total 423 spaces in the parking ramp. • The project owner is encouraged to implement Travel Demand Management strategies for this site with the goal of reducing vehicular trips during peak hours and reducing carbon emissions from vehicles. Potential strategies for this site include: o Providing maps that show the area bus routes, bus schedules, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. o Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. o Providing charging stations for electric vehicles in the resident parking areas. o Providing long-term and short-term bicycle parking spaces for apartment residents. o Offering a pre-paid Metro Transit Go-To Card to all new residents. July 2021 2-1 DRAFT 2.0 Purpose and Background The purpose of this Traffic and Parking Study is to evaluate the impacts of the proposed new residential building located at 4911 77th Street W. in Edina, MN. The project site is located in the northwest quadrant of the Computer Avenue/Viking Drive intersection. The proposed project location is currently vacant land within the previously approved Pentagon South development. The project location is shown in Figure 1. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development at the following intersections: • 77th Street W./Parklawn Avenue • 77th Street W./Computer Avenue • 77th Street/development access • 77th Street W./TH 100 NB ramp • Edina Industrial Blvd/TH 100 SB ramp • Computer Avenue/development access Proposed Development Characteristics The proposed project will involve constructing a new apartment building with 200 dwelling units. The project is expected to include 157 on-site parking stalls. The project will also use stalls in the adjacent parking ramp. As shown in the site plan, the site has access to the internal street system within the Pentagon South development. The project is expected to be completed in 2023. The current site plan is shown in Figure 2. July 2021 2-2 DRAFT July 2021 2-3 DRAFT July 2021 3-1 DRAFT 3.0 Existing Conditions The project site is currently vacant land within the previously approved Pentagon South development. The site is bounded by Computer Avenue on the east, Viking Drive on the south, and the Pentagon South development on the north and west. Near the site location, 77th Street is a five-lane roadway with a center left turn lane. Computer Avenue and Parklawn Avenue are two-lane roadways. To the west of the site, 77th Street intersects with TH 100 at a full grade separated interchange. The speed limit on all local streets in the study area is 30 miles per hour. Existing conditions at the proposed project location are shown in Figure 3 and described below. 77th Street W./Parklawn Avenue This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound approach provides two left turn lanes and one through/right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one through/right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn/through lane and two right turn lanes. The northbound approach provides one left turn/through/right turn lane. The south leg provides access a commercial use on the south side of 77th Street. 77th Street W./Computer Avenue This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one through/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane, one left turn/through lane, and one right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn/through/right turn lane. The north leg provides access to an office use on the north side of 77th Street. 77th Street W./development access This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one through/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane, one left turn/through lane, and one right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn/through/right turn lane. The north leg provides access to an office use on the north side of 77th Street. 77th Street W./TH 100 NB ramp This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound approach provides on left turn lane, one through lane, and one through/right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one right turn lane. The northbound approach provides two left turn lanes and one through/right turn lane. The southbound approach provides two left turn lanes, one through lane, and one channelized right turn lane. July 2021 3-2 DRAFT Edina Industrial Blvd/TH 100 SB ramp This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound approach provides on left turn lane, one through lane, and one through/right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one channelized right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. The southbound approach provides two left turn lanes, one through lane, and one right turn lane. Computer Avenue/development access This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the eastbound development access approach. The eastbound approach provides one left/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn/through lane. The southbound approach provides one through/right turn lane. Traffic Volume Data Existing turn movement data previously collected for other studies in the area was obtained from City staff for the following intersections: • 77th Street W./Parklawn Avenue • 77th Street W./Computer Avenue • 77th Street W./development access • 77th Street W./TH 100 NB ramp • Edina Industrial Blvd/TH 100 SB ramp July 2021 3-3 DRAFT July 2021 4-1 DRAFT 4.0 Traffic Forecasts Traffic Forecast Scenarios To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project, forecasts and analyses were completed for the year 2024. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts were completed for the following scenarios: • 2021 Existing. Existing volumes were determined through traffic counts at the subject intersections. The existing volume information includes trips generated by the uses near the project site. • 2024 No-Build. Existing volumes at the subject intersections were increased by 1.0 percent per year to determine 2024 No-Build volumes. The 1.0 percent per year growth rate was calculated based on both recent growth experienced near the site and projected growth due to additional development in the area. • 2024 Build. Trips generated by the proposed development were added to the 2024 No-Build volumes to determine 2024 Build volumes. Estimation of Existing Volumes Due to COVID-19 Impacts The impacts of COVID-19 have resulted in significant reductions in traffic volumes due to changes in work and travel habits. Traffic volume data collected for studies completed prior to the pandemic were used for the traffic forecasts presented in this report. Trip Generation for Proposed Project Weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip generation for the proposed development were calculated based on data presented in the tenth edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Table 4-1. Table 4-1 Trip Generation for Proposed Project Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Proposed use Apartments 200 DU 19 53 72 54 34 88 1088 DU=dwelling unit As shown, the project adds 72 net trips during the a.m. peak hour, 88 net trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 1,088 net trips daily. July 2021 4-2 DRAFT Trip Distribution Percentages Trip distribution percentages for the subject development trips were established based on the nearby roadway network, existing and expected future traffic patterns, and location of the subject development in relation to major attractions and population concentrations. The distribution percentages for trips generated by the proposed development are as follows: • 25 percent to/from the north on TH 100 • 25 percent to/from the south on TH 100 • 25 percent to/from the west on Edina Industrial Boulevard • 2 percent to/from the south on Computer Avenue • 11 percent to/from the north on Parklawn Avenue • 12 percent to/from the east on 77th Street Traffic Volumes Development trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the forecasting scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The resultant traffic volumes are presented in Figure 4. July 2021 4-3 DRAFT July 2021 5-1 DRAFT 5.0 Traffic Analysis Intersection Level of Service Analysis Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersections for all scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours using Synchro/SimTraffic software. Initial analysis was completed using existing geometrics and intersection control. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. The following is a detailed description of the conditions described by each LOS designation: • Level of service A corresponds to a free flow condition with motorists virtually unaffected by the intersection control mechanism. For a signalized or an unsignalized intersection, the average delay per vehicle would be approximately 10 seconds or less. • Level of service B represents stable flow with a high degree of freedom, but with some influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. For a signalized intersection, the average delay ranges from 10 to 20 seconds. An unsignalized intersection would have delays ranging from 10 to 15 seconds for this level. • Level of service C depicts a restricted flow which remains stable, but with significant influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. The general level of comfort and convenience changes noticeably at this level. The delay ranges from 20 to 35 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 15 to 25 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service D corresponds to high-density flow in which speed and freedom are significantly restricted. Though traffic flow remains stable, reductions in comfort and convenience are experienced. The control delay for this level is 35 to 55 seconds for a signalized intersection and 25 to 35 seconds for an unsignalized intersection. • Level of service E represents unstable flow of traffic at or near the capacity of the intersection with poor levels of comfort and convenience. The delay ranges from 55 to 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 35 to 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service F represents forced flow in which the volume of traffic approaching the intersection exceeds the volume that can be served. Characteristics often experienced include long queues, stop-and-go waves, poor travel times, low comfort and convenience, and increased accident exposure. Delays over 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and over 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection correspond to this level of service. July 2021 5-2 DRAFT The LOS results for the study intersections are shown in Figure 5 and are discussed below. 77th Street W./Parklawn Avenue (traffic signal control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS B for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS B for all scenarios. 77th Street W./Computer Avenue (traffic signal control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS B for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS D or better for all scenarios. 77th Street W./development access (traffic signal control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. 77th Street W./TH 100 NB ramp (traffic signal control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS E or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C or better for all scenarios. Edina Industrial Blvd/TH 100 SB ramp (traffic signal control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS E or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. July 2021 5-3 DRAFT Computer Avenue/access (minor street stop control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. Overall Traffic Impact The net trips added to the roadway system by the proposed development are expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. No improvements are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. Comparison to Pentagon South Traffic Study The traffic volume forecasts for the current project were compared to forecasts presented in the Pentagon South traffic study dated May 2, 2018. The Pentagon South traffic study accounted for full development of the site assuming a 153 room hotel on the current project site. A comparison of the trip generation for the previous hotel use to the current apartment use is shown in Table 5-1. Table 5-1 Trip Generation Comparison for Proposed Project and Previous Use Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Proposed use Apartments 200 DU 19 53 72 54 34 88 1088 Previous study use Hotel 153 rooms 42 30 72 47 45 92 1279 DU=dwelling unit As shown, the proposed apartment use generates the same number of trips during the a.m. peak hour, 4 fewer trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 191 fewer daily trips. Overall, the proposed apartment use has less impact to traffic operations than the previously assumed hotel use. Therefore, the results and recommendations from the Pentagon South traffic study are not impacted and are still valid. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Under existing conditions, sidewalk is provided on the south side of 77th Street, the west side of Parklawn Avenue, and the west side of Computer Avenue. The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is located north of the project site. All intersections in the study have crosswalks across all or a portion of the approaches. Bicycles are allowed on all the surrounding streets. July 2021 5-4 DRAFT Future plans for this area include a new primary sidewalk on 77th Street. Future plans for this area also include a conventional bike lane on 77th Street. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. The project owner is encouraged to provide bicycle parking spaces to promote bicycle use by residents. Long-term spaces for residents within the building and outside racks for short-term parking are recommended. The provision of a bicycle maintenance station will also help encourage bicycle use by residents. Transit Facilities The subject site presently is served by the Metro Transit bus routes 6 and 540. Bus stops exist on 77th Street at the development access and at Computer Avenue. Potential Travel Demand Management Measures The project owner is encouraged to implement Travel Demand Management strategies for this site with the goal of reducing vehicular trips during peak hours and reducing carbon emissions from vehicles. Potential strategies for this site include: • Providing maps that show the area bus routes, light rail and bus schedules, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. • Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. • Providing charging stations for electric vehicles in the resident parking areas. • Providing long-term and short-term bicycle parking spaces for apartment residents. • Offering a pre-paid Metro Transit Go-To Card to all new residents. July 2021 5-5 DRAFT July 2021 6-1 DRAFT 6.0 Parking Analysis As described earlier, the project is expected to include 157 on-site parking stalls. The project will also use stalls in the adjacent parking ramp which has 423 stalls. The proposed amount of parking was compared to industry standards to determine adequacy. Parking data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) was used to determine the expected parking demand for the proposed land uses. Data provided in the ITE publication Parking Generation, 5th Edition, indicates the various proposed uses peak at different times during the day. The ITE data was adjusted to account for the expected modal split for the site. Based on the ITE data, the peak weekday parking demand for the overall site 262 spaces. The 157 spaces on-site are 105 spaces less than the expected peak parking demand. The current City ordinance is 2 stalls per unit, which equates to 400 stalls. The proposed draft parking ordinance that is in front of the City Council is 1.25 stalls per unit, which equates to 250 stalls. The expected parking demand was also calculated for additional development within the Pentagon South development. The parking demand was calculated for the first phase of office space of 19,000 square feet and a 235 room hotel. The peak parking demand for these uses is 177 spaces from 6-8 a.m. Combining this peak demand with the portion of the apartment peak demand that would use the parking ramp (105 spaces) results in a total demand of 282 spaces. This peak demand is 141 spaces less than the total 423 spaces in the parking ramp. July 2021 7-1 DRAFT 7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to add 72 net trips during the a.m. peak hour, 88 net trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 1,088 net trips daily. Net trips account for new trips generated by the development and trips eliminated by removal of the existing office space. • The net trips added to the roadway system by the proposed development are expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. No improvements are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. • Traffic volume data collected for previous studies in this area was used at all intersections to avoid traffic volume reductions that have occurred due to the COVID-19 pandemic impacts. This process resulted in reasonable estimates for the weekday peak hours that would occur under non-pandemic conditions. • Future plans for this area include a new primary sidewalk on 77th Street. Future plans for this area also include a conventional bike lane on 77th Street. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. • The project owner is encouraged to provide bicycle parking spaces to promote bicycle use by residents. Long-term spaces for residents within the building and outside racks for short-term parking are recommended. The provision of a bicycle maintenance station will also help encourage bicycle use by residents. • Based on the ITE data, the peak weekday parking demand for the overall site 262 spaces. The 157 spaces on-site are 105 spaces less than the expected peak parking demand. • The current City parking ordinance is 2 stalls per unit, which equates to 400 stalls. The proposed draft parking ordinance that is in front of the City Council is 1.25 stalls per unit, which equates to 250 stalls. • The expected parking demand for the first phase of office space (19,000 square feet) and a 235 room hotel within Pentagon South was calculated to be 177 spaces from 6-8 a.m. Combining this peak demand with the portion of the apartment peak demand that would use the parking ramp (105 spaces) results in a total demand of 282 spaces. This peak demand is 141 spaces less than the total 423 spaces in the parking ramp. • The project owner is encouraged to implement Travel Demand Management strategies for this site with the goal of reducing vehicular trips during peak hours and reducing carbon emissions from vehicles. Potential strategies for this site include: July 2021 7-2 DRAFT o Providing maps that show the area bus routes, bus schedules, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. o Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. o Providing charging stations for electric vehicles in the resident parking areas. o Providing long-term and short-term bicycle parking spaces for apartment residents. o Offering a pre-paid Metro Transit Go-To Card to all new residents. July 2021 8-1 DRAFT 8.0 Appendix • Level of Service Worksheets 16 JAN 2019 PENTAGON VILLAGEMASTER PLAN CONCEPT EDINA, MN 3 N WEST 77TH STREET NORMANDALE ROADCOMPUTER AVEVIKING DRIVE PHASE 1 SITE PLAN Site 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 1 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 4 SITE PLAN REST /RET 1 REST / RET 2 RETOFFICE OFFICE1 OFFICE2 PARKING DECK BELOW DUAL BRANDHOTEL (1) EXTENDED STAY HOTEL (2) PARKING DECK BELOW EXTENDED STAY HOTEL (2) 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 5 DATA TABLE SUMMARY OFFICE 1 OFFICE 2 HOTEL 1 HOTEL 2 PARKING (office) PARKING (hotel) RETAIL 1 RETAIL 2 RETAIL / OFFICE 25,000sf per floor5 floors125,000sf total 20,000sf per floor5 floors100,000sf total 193 keys4 floors 153 keys4 floors 1,155 spaces 390 spaces 7,500 sf 4,300 sf 19,000 sf 70 spaces 125spaces REST /RET 1 REST / RET 2 RET /OFFICE OFFICE1 OFFICE2 PARKING DECK BELOW DUAL BRANDHOTEL (1) EXTENDED STAY HOTEL (2) EXTENDED STAY HOTEL (2) PARKING DECK BELOW 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 14 DIAGRAM: GREEN CONNECTIONS NMCRT&FREDRICHARDSPARK 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 15 SITE ENTRY 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 16 AERIAL LOOKING SOUTH 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 17 NORTHWEST CORNER & PARK 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 27 CENTRAL PARK 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 28 PARK & OFFICE 2 ENTRY 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 29 EXTENDED STAY HOTEL DROP OFF 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 30 PARKING DECK AND HOTEL 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 31 VIKING DRIVE DRAFT ORDINANCE FOR CONSIDERATION ORDINANCE NO. 2019-03 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO REVISE THE PUD-17, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-17 ZONING DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 36-507 Planned Unit Development District-17 (PUD-17) Pentagon Park South (a) Legal description: See attached Exhibit A (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans, including the master development plan for the site received by the City on January 17, 2019 except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2019-17 on file in the Office of the Planning Department. (c) Principal Uses: All uses allowed in the MDD-6 Zoning District Multi-family Apartments/Condos. (d) Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the MDD-3-6 Zoning District. (e) Conditional Uses: All conditional uses allowed in the MDD-3-6 Zoning District. (f) Development Standards. Required Setbacks - Buildings 77th Street Computer Avenue Normandale Boulevard Viking Drive 15 feet 15 feet 50 feet 10 Feet Building Height 12 stories & 144 feet per the height overlay district Parking lot and drive aisle setback 20 feet Building Coverage 30% 2 (g) Signs shall be regulated per the Mixed Development District. (h) Ninety percent (90%) of the parking stalls within the development shall be available to all uses within the development. Section 2. This ordinance is effective upon approval by the Metropolitan Council of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.5% Parking Stalls – Mixed Development District Phase 1 (Based on the uses) 602 stalls www.pentagonvillageedina.com development April 23, 2021PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS21-0068 SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTAL 4911 77th St W Edina, MN Existing Zoning: Planned Unit Development District-17 (PUD-17) Pentagon Park South 1000 ft N➤➤NImage Landsat / Copernicus Image Landsat / Copernicus Image Landsat / Copernicus www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 221-0068 EDINA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Economic Vitality and Competitiveness Urban Design Land Use Transportation and Mobility Parks and Public Life District Services and Facilities Sustainability Water Resources PUBLIC AMENITIES GREATER SOUTHDALE DISTRICT Concentration of jobs, residences, medical services, traffic, and activity. Attracting residents, workers, customers, patients, visitors, and others from throughout the region, Greater Southdale District is a major destination. Role as economic engine for the city and region. The economic impact of this area is significant, particularly in terms of sustaining the tax base for the City of Edina. Meeting diverse housing needs of the population. Greater Southdale District has a variety of diverse housing types that meet the needs of Edina residents, and are not generally available in many areas of the city. Retail and services hub for the community. In addition to its role in the regional economy, Greater Southdale District meets the needs of the community for retail and services, with the capacity to evolve for changing preferences. Capacity for growth and change. The Greater Southdale District has been an evolving area since its inception. It has more capacity for growth and change than many other areas of the city. GREATER SOUTHDALE DISTRICT CORE ELEMENTS SITE AS MOBILITY HUB Mobility Hubs. Bringing together different modes of travel – walking, transit, biking, and shared mobility - and integrating the location with information technology to help travelers find, access, and pay for transit and shared mobility services creates a mobility hub. Strategically locating mobility hubs at gateways to the District (Southdale Center, Centennial Lakes and near Highway 100 in the 76th Street/77th Street corridor), encourages people to access the heart of the district by modes other than cars. A network of green, lined by community-focused destinations will create a diverse set of opportunities for people to participate as a community across the Greater Southdale District. The red dots represent mobility hubs and the yellow circles represent ½ mile walking distance. The intent of the Mobility Hub location is to encourage pedestrian to use the central-spine-like Centennial Lakes Park and or the Promenade as the main corridor to get to events, shopping and home. For residents, the experience of walking home should be the best part of the day, marked by a chance encounter, a pickup game of basketball, or an early meal out. The same can be said for visitors arriving at one the three Mobility Hubs: “It’s never too far to walk to where you want to go within the Greater Southdale District!” SITE SITE www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 321-0068 Modular Constructiono Reduction in construction waste compared to typical stick-built constructiono Completing site and foundation work in parallel to modular manufacturing helps to reduce overall construction duration by 30% to 50% minimizing disruption to surrounding neighborhood.o Minimization of site disturbance during staging and construction o Controlled production environment minimizes site risks while improving build quality and worker safety.o Decreases energy consumption during constructiono Reduction of overall emissions by decreasing deliveries to site Energy and Carbon o Building will benchmark, report yearly energy consumption per the Efficient Building Benchmarking Ordinance (City of Edina) o Reduction in energy use through well-insulated building, inherent in modular construction o Utilize Xcel Energy’s Energy Design Assistance o LED lighting throughout Water and Wastewater o Looking at the percentage of pervious surface on the property and maintaining as much as possible o Water conserving plumbing fixtures throughout o Efficient plumbing layout and design o Potential for non-potable water reuse o Thoughtful stormwater management o Efficient irrigation and potential water reuse strategies Place and Ecologyo Take into consideration how the landscaping can support the natural ecosystem o Will carefully consider what % of landscape, % Rain gardens, % native plants, % pollinator friendly plants can be usedo Increase tree canopy at property (zero trees currently on site)o Drought tolerant landscapeo Pollinator friendly landscapeo Green outdoor amenity deck: amenity lawn / garden conceals parking below podium Materials and Circularity o Manage construction waste o Waste management plan for building o Recycling provided for residential units o Potential for organics recycling / composting to be provided for residential units o Use of products with recycled content and ingredient transparency as much as possible o Use of regional materials where possible Equity and Justice o 10% of residential units will be affordable o Promote alternative transportation o Bicycle parking near main entry for guests o Interior, sheltered bicycle storage for residents o Potential for EV charging stations to be provided o Potential to provide parking for car-sharing vehicles REGENERATIVE DESIGN AND SUSTAINABILITY www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 421-0068 2000 ft N➤➤N Image Landsat / Copernicus Image Landsat / Copernicus Image Landsat / Copernicus Edina Projections 2010 2020 2030 2040 Population 47,941 55,000 60,000 63,600 Households 20,672 24,000 27,700 29,800 Employment 47,457 51,800 54,000 56,100 100 494 VIKING DRIVE COMPUTER AVE77TH ST. W trailpublic transit route transit stop park wetland Highly Connected Located in 9 Mile Creek Watershed Challenged Water Table Borders City of Bloomington Main Roads Trails / Transit Wetlands and Parks SITE MAP Nord Myr Park Fred Richards Park www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 521-0068 9 MILE CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL Imagery ©2021 Maxar Technologies, U.S. Geological Survey, USDA Farm Service Agency, Map data ©2021 200 ft Image capture: May 2018 Images may be subject to copyright. Hema latha Thotakura Photo - May 2018 Fred Richards Park 9 Mile Creek Trail9 Mile Creek Trail On Street Trail FRED RICHARDS PARK PENTAGON VILLAGE SITE CONTEXT FOOD JOBS PARKS SCHOOLS www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 621-0068 SITE FROM SOUTH SITE FROM EAST LOT 3 - FROM EAST PLAZA TRELLIS PARKING STRUCTURE SITE ENTRY FROM EAST PLAZA VIEW OF PARKING STRUCTURE PLAZA VIEW OF PARKING STRUCTURE EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS THE PLAZA AT PENTAGON VILLAGE EXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE THE PLAZA AT PENTAGON VILLAGE EXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 721-0068 The master plan is organized around The Plaza at Pentagon Village framed with the buildings, creating a village commons. Ample green space and landscaping allow people to access the plaza from surrounding neighborhood and the building front doors. The office space and a dual brand hotel surround the plaza, with retailers and restaurants easily accessible via pedestrian walkways. Designed as a programmable space, the plaza will host events, concerts and other social opportunities year-round. Two retail spaces frame the entrance and act as the front doors to the development. The master plan highlights the building exteriors with an “urban edge” design style. This makes the architectural details of the buildings visible from the nearby highways. Materials like aluminum, metal, glass and landscaped screen walls add texture and depth to the buildings. PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN PROPOSED SITE www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 821-0068 PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN - LOT 3 EXTENDED STAY HOTEL PROPOSED APARTMENT BUILDING 6 STORY APARTMENT BUILDING PROPOSED CHANGE OF USE - LOT 3 www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 921-0068 LOT 5 - PROPOSED OFFICE RENDER LOT 5 - PROPOSED OFFICE RENDER LOT 2 - APPROVED HOTEL ELEVATION LOT 1 - EXISTING COMMERCIAL ELEVATION LOT 1 - EXISTING COMMERCIAL ELEVATION LOT 1 - EXISTING COMMERCIAL ELEVATION LOT 1 - EXISTING COMMERCIAL ELEVATION PENTAGON VILLAGE DESIGN CHARACTER FOR REFERENCE ONLY www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 1021-0068 VIKING DRIVE PARKING RAMP COMPUTER AVENUESITE PLAN 1 2 3 Entry Lobby Art Walk Residential Patios 4 5 6 Pool Fire Pit Bike Lounge 7 8 Bike Parking Move In Zone 1 2 4 6 5 8 7 DEDICATED SPACE FOR EASE OF LARGER SIZED VEHICLES TO PARK AS NEW RESIDENTS MOVE. DEDICATED PARKING FOR BIKERS ADJACENT TO THE BIKE LOUNGE AND EXTERIOR TRAILS. INDOOR AMENITY WITH QUICK CONNECTION TO THE OUTSIDE TRAIL CONNECTIONS WITH BIKE PARKING. OUTDOOR AMENITY FOR SOCIAL GATHERING THAT HAS VIEW OUT OF THE CITY. THE PRIMARY EXTERIOR AMENITY ON THE AMENITY DECK. PROVIDES EXTERIOR PRIVATE SPACES FOR LOWER LEVEL RESI- DENTS THE MAIN WALK TO THE BUILDING AND CAMPUS. CREATES A UNIQUE EXPERIENCE AND SENSE OF ARRIVAL. WELCOME GUESTS AND RESIDENTS WITH ART, LANDSCAPE, OR EXTERIOR FEATURE AS THEY ENTER THE BUILDING.. 9 Stormwater Management Strategies BELOW GRADE FILTRATION TANKS. CAPTURE AND TREAT STORMWATER ON SITE. 3 3 39 www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 1121-0068 EXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE INTERNAL DRIVE VIKING DRIVE COMPUTER AVELOBBY BIKELOUNGEENCLOSED PARKING FLEXIBLE SPACEFLOOR PLAN - GROUND FLOOR www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 1221-0068 AMENITY SPACE UNITS UNITS AMENITY DECK FLOOR PLAN - 2ND FLOOR www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 1321-0068 UNITS UNITS FLOOR PLANS - 3RD - 6TH FLOOR www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 1421-0068 0' 68'PROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINEVIKING DRIVE COMPUTER AVEEXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE PROPERTYLINEFUTURE HOTEL FUTURE HOTEL 5 STORIES OF TYPE IIIB 1 STORY OF TYPE 1 FUTURE COMMERCIAL INTERNAL DRIVE 0' 68' ~71' T.O. PARAPET 5 STORIES OF TYPE IIIB 1 STORY OF TYPE 1 MASSING SECTION - BUILDING HEIGHTS BUILDING SECTION DIAGRAM - EAST/WEST BUILDING SECTION DIAGRAM - NORTH/SOUTH www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 1521-0068 Total Bldg. GSF 232,965 Total Acres 1.78 Density (U.P.A.)107.01 Total SF 77,340 Level 1 Coverage (%) 72% FAR 3.01 Level 1 55,800 Level 2 36,485 Level 3 35,170 Level 4 35,170 Level 5 35,170 Level 6 35,170 232,965 New Parking Stalls Surface 5 Parking Structure (first level of proposed apartment building)161 Existing Parking Stalls (used for the proposed aparment building) Surface 0 Parking Structure 84 Parking Stalls/ Unit 1.25 T O T A L P A R K I N G 250 S I T E M E T R I C S T O T A L B U I L D I N G M E T R I C S Gross Building S Q U A R E F O O T A G E B Y F L O O R AXON VIEW FROM THE SOUTH WEST AXON VIEW FROM THE SOUTH EAST AXON VIEW FROM THE NORTH WEST AXON VIEW FROM THE NORTH EAST MASSING CO M P U T E R A V E COMPUTER AVEVIKING BLV D BUILDING RENDER VIEW FROM THE NW PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 121-0068 development VIEW FROM THE NW PROJECT LOCATION PENTAGON VILLAGE - RENDER PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 221-0068 development MASTER PLAN UPDATE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED MASTER PLAN PROPOSED UPDATED MASTER PLAN FUTURE OFFICEDEVELOPMENT FUTURE RETAIL DEVELOPMENT FUTURE HOTEL DEVELOPMENT PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 321-0068 development MASTER PLAN UPDATE PROPOSED UPDATED MASTER PLAN FUTURE OFFICE DEVELOPMENT FUTURE HOTEL DEVELOPMENT FUTURE RETAIL DEVELOPMENT PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 421-0068 development EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS PLAZA ART INSTALLATION EXISTING COMMERICAL STRUCTURE PARKING STRUCTURE VIEW FROM PLAZA SITE ENTRY FROM NORTH PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 521-0068 development Viking Drive “Pentagon Village” Drive Computer AveSITE PLAN Urban Edge Park View Out & AboutEntry Plaza PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 621-0068 development PROPOSED PLANTING MATERIALS PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 721-0068 development BUILDING RENDER VIEW FROM THE NW PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 821-0068 development RENDERING VIEW FROM THE NE PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 921-0068 development RENDERING VIEW OF THE NW CORNER PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 1021-0068 development RENDERING VIEW OF THE NE CORNER PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 1121-0068 development RENDERING STREETSCAPE NORTH SIDE PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 1221-0068 development EXTERIOR MATERIALS PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 1321-0068 development Viking Drive “Pentagon Village” Drive Computer AveLobby Hobby Fitness BikesDog RunTrash Secure Parking MainEntry LEVEL 1 PLAN PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 1421-0068 development Viking Drive “Pentagon Village” Drive Computer AveClub Room Plaza Deck Over Parking LEVEL 2 PLAN PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 1521-0068 development MODULAR CONSTRUCTION PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 1621-0068 development SUSTAINABILITYMODULAR CONSTRUCTION • Reduction in construction waste compared to typical stick-built construction• Completing site and foundation work in parallel to modular manufacturing helps to reduce overall construction duration by 30% to 50% minimizing disruption to surrounding neighborhood.• Minimization of site disturbance during staging and construction ENERGY AND CARBON • Building will benchmark, report yearly energy consumption per the Efficient Building Benchmarking Ordinance (City of Edina)• Reduction in energy use through well-insulated building, inherent in modular construction• Utilize Xcel Energy’s Energy Design Assistance• Investigating Solar Viability, Solar Ready WATER AND WASTEWATER • Water conserving plumbing fixtures throughout• Efficient plumbing layout and design• Thoughtful storm water management PLACE AND ECOLOGY • Take into consideration how the landscaping can support the natural ecosystem • Drought tolerant landscape• Pollinator friendly landscape MATERIALS AND CIRCULARITY • Manage construction waste• Waste management plan for building• Potential for organics recycling / composting to be provided for residential units• Use of regional materials where possible EQUITY AND JUSTICE • 10% of residential units will be affordable• Interior, sheltered bicycle storage for residents• 5-10% Electric Vehicle Stations in place.• 50% EV ready with space allocated for 100%.• Car share program planned. PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 1721-0068 development RENDERING VIEW FROM THE NE PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 1821-0068 development BUILDING RENDER VIEW FROM THE NW PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 121-0068 development VIEW FROM THE NW PROJECT LOCATION PENTAGON VILLAGE - RENDER PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 221-0068 development MASTER PLAN UPDATE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED MASTER PLAN PROPOSED UPDATED MASTER PLAN FUTURE OFFICEDEVELOPMENT FUTURE RETAIL DEVELOPMENT FUTURE HOTEL DEVELOPMENT PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 321-0068 development MASTER PLAN UPDATE PROPOSED UPDATED MASTER PLAN FUTURE OFFICE DEVELOPMENT FUTURE HOTEL DEVELOPMENT FUTURE RETAIL DEVELOPMENT PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 421-0068 development EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS PLAZA ART INSTALLATION EXISTING COMMERICAL STRUCTURE PARKING STRUCTURE VIEW FROM PLAZA SITE ENTRY FROM NORTH PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 521-0068 development Viking Drive “Pentagon Village” Drive Computer AveSITE PLAN Urban Edge Park View Out & AboutEntry Plaza PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 621-0068 development PROPOSED PLANTING MATERIALS PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 721-0068 development BUILDING RENDER VIEW FROM THE NW PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 821-0068 development RENDERING VIEW FROM THE NE PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 921-0068 development RENDERING VIEW OF THE NW CORNER PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 1021-0068 development RENDERING VIEW OF THE NE CORNER PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 1121-0068 development RENDERING STREETSCAPE NORTH SIDE PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 1221-0068 development EXTERIOR MATERIALS PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 1321-0068 development Viking Drive “Pentagon Village” Drive Computer AveLobby Hobby Fitness BikesDog RunTrash Secure Parking MainEntry LEVEL 1 PLAN PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 1421-0068 development Viking Drive “Pentagon Village” Drive Computer AveClub Room Plaza Deck Over Parking LEVEL 2 PLAN PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 1521-0068 development MODULAR CONSTRUCTION PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 1621-0068 development SUSTAINABILITYMODULAR CONSTRUCTION • Reduction in construction waste compared to typical stick-built construction• Completing site and foundation work in parallel to modular manufacturing helps to reduce overall construction duration by 30% to 50% minimizing disruption to surrounding neighborhood.• Minimization of site disturbance during staging and construction ENERGY AND CARBON • Building will benchmark, report yearly energy consumption per the Efficient Building Benchmarking Ordinance (City of Edina)• Reduction in energy use through well-insulated building, inherent in modular construction• Utilize Xcel Energy’s Energy Design Assistance• Investigating Solar Viability, Solar Ready WATER AND WASTEWATER • Water conserving plumbing fixtures throughout• Efficient plumbing layout and design• Thoughtful storm water management PLACE AND ECOLOGY • Take into consideration how the landscaping can support the natural ecosystem • Drought tolerant landscape• Pollinator friendly landscape MATERIALS AND CIRCULARITY • Manage construction waste• Waste management plan for building• Potential for organics recycling / composting to be provided for residential units• Use of regional materials where possible EQUITY AND JUSTICE • 10% of residential units will be affordable• Interior, sheltered bicycle storage for residents• 5-10% Electric Vehicle Stations in place.• 50% EV ready with space allocated for 100%.• Car share program planned. PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 1721-0068 development RENDERING VIEW FROM THE NE PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 1821-0068 development NORTHERN EDGE PLAN PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota August 9, 2021 | PAGE 121-0068 development NORTHERN EDGE RENDERING PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota August 9, 2021 | PAGE 221-0068 development NORTHERN EDGE RENDERING PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota August 9, 2021 | PAGE 321-0068 development NORTHERN EDGE RENDERING PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota August 9, 2021 | PAGE 421-0068 development Date: August 17, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-63: Supporting Hennepin County's Layout No. 2 Vernon Ave Bridge Replacement Project Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2021-63 supporting Hennepin County's Layout No. 2 Vernon Ave Bridge Replacement project INTRODUCTION: Hennepin County is seeking municipal consent for the current layout for the Vernon Avenue Bridge Replacement Project. Staff supports this resolution. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-63: Supporting Hennepin County's Layout No. 2 Vernon Ave Bridge Replacement Project Vernon Ave Bridge Project Layout No. 2 1994 No Parking Resolution Staff Presentation Staff Presentation 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-63 SUPPORTING HENNEPIN COUNTYS LAYOUT NO. 2 OF THE VERNON AVENUE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, Hennepin County, through the Metropolitan Council was granted federal funding for the Vernon Avenue Bridge Replacement over the CP Rail; and, WHEREAS, the funding would be available for the years 2022-2023 WHEREAS, the existing bridge, built in 1927, has reached the end of its useful life and warrants replacement; and, WHEREAS, the existing bridge, currently has weight restrictions and is classified as structurally deficient; and, WHEREAS, a new bridge would address a critical asset near TH 100 and provide improved safety for all modes; and, WHEREAS, Hennepin County has submitted a Level 1 Layout for review and approval to MnDOT for a new bridge that would address a critical asset near TH 100 and provide improved safety for all modes; and, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Edina approves Layout No. 2, for the replacement of the Vernon Avenue Bridge over the CP Rail including the Vernon Avenue roadway improvements between Trunk Highway 100 and Interlachen Blvd and the following: • Hennepin County is hereby authorized to acquire all right-of-way, permits, and/or easements required for improvements in accordance with Layout No. 2 • The City of Edina agrees to continue to ban the parking of motor vehicles at all times and to provide enforcement for the prohibition of on-street parking per the Resolution Dated August 15, 1994. Adopted this 17th day of August, 2021. ATTEST:_____________________________ _________________________________ City Clerk Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 17, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ________ day of _____________________, 20__. __________________________________ City Clerk AW.7- ) I - CiLy of Edina RESOLUTION RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS On CSAH 158 (Vernon Avenue) from T.H. 100 to Blake Road in the City of Edina, Minnesota. THIS RESOLUTION passed this 15th day of August, 1994, by the City of Edina in Hennepin County, Minnesota. The Municipal corporation shall hereinafter be called the "City", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the "City" has reviewed the operation of CSAH 158 from T.H. 100 to Blake Road, WHEREAS, this traffic operation does not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS THEREBY RESOLVED: that the "City", shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on both sides of CSAH 158 between T.H. 100 and Blake Road. Dated this 15th day of August, 1994. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA CERTIFICATE. OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 15, 1994, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this August 16, 1994. -711,4J6- Oat,- City Clerk City Hall (612) 927-8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927-7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424-1394 TDD (612) 927-5461 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 1 OPTION 2KEEP EXISTING NB OFF RAMPW/O PROPOSED OFF RAMP Date: August 17, 2021 Agenda Item #: X.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Advisory Communication From:Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator Item Activity: Subject:Advisory Communication: Community Health Commission: Opioid Prevention and Education Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Receive Advisory Communication from the Community Health Commission. INTRODUCTION: The Community Health Commission 2021 work plan contains an item relating to opioid use and possible City of Edina intervention strategies to help reduce access to and use of opioids. T he work plan item states: “Study and report on existing programs in Edina and Hennepin County regarding opioid use. Provide examples of efforts to increase public awareness of existing programs.” The Community Health Commission reviewed and approved the attached report at its August 9, 2021 meeting. The report details the difficulty in finding information regarding disposal locations for prescription opioids as well as the lack of significant outreach and education to the public regarding disposal. The report also suggests a 2022 Community Health Commission work plan item containing specific recommendations, which is a logical next step. There is potential for collaboration on this type of initiative between Edina, Bloomington, and Richfield through our existing partnership for Public Health activities. ATTACHMENTS: Description Advisory Communication: Community Health Commission: Opioid Prevention Date: August 17, 2021 To: Mayor and Council From: Community Health Commission Subject: 2021 Community Health Commission Work Plan Initiative Report: Opioid Disposal and Outreach Action Requested: Accept Advisory Communication Community Health Commission 2021 Work Plan Initiative #3: “Study and report on existing programs in Edina and Hennepin County regarding opiate use. Provide examples of efforts to increase public awareness of existing programs.” Municipalities and other entities reviewed: A committee of the Commission reviewed information from websites for Hennepin County, and cities of Edina, Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Golden Valley, Hopkins, Minnetonka, Plymouth, Richfield, St. Louis Park, and Plymouth (see Appendix). Interviews were conducted with Kate Ebert MPH, CHES, Health Specialist of the Bloomington Health Department and Candi Davenport, of the Bloomington Health Department and Candi Davenport, Licensed Alcohol and Drug Counselor for the Edina School District. Background: Opiates obtained both by prescription or by illegal means have caused an increasingly severe epidemic of addiction and death in the United States. From 1999 until 2019, opiate deaths increased in the US from approximately 18,000 to over 70,000 annually (1). Figures from 2020 are preliminary, but opiate-related deaths probably exceeded 90,000. Minnesota has not been immune from this epidemic. Deaths from opiates increased from 412 in 2019 to 654 in 2020, with 59% of the deaths occurring in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. Data for Edina are difficult to locate, but in 2018, at least 3 deaths were attributed to opiates, 9 in the tri-city area (Edina, Richfield, Bloomington) (2). The importance of municipalities to contribute to the reversal of these trends is readily apparent. Strategy: The 2020 Hennepin County Opioid Response Strategic Framework (“2020 Framework”) (2) provides a solid basis for municipalities to implement programs to reduce opioid-related morbidity and death. Three key pillars of strategy are Page 2 identified: primary prevention, response, and treatment and recovery. In reverse order: a) Treatment and recovery: The entities reviewed do little more than sometimes list available programs to which opiate users may be referred. This aspect of strategy does not appear to be regarded as a municipal or school district responsibility. b) Response: The strategic goal is two-fold: ensure easy and rapid access to naloxone, the antidote for opiate overdose; and provide clean needle exchange to minimize contamination risk among opiate, especially heroin, users. Of note, Edina police, fire and emergency medical personnel are all trained in the use of naloxone. c) Primary prevention: This is the area in which municipalities and schools have the greatest opportunity to impact the opioid epidemic, and will be reviewed separately in the following section. Primary prevention: “The 2020 Framework focuses on preventing further spread of the opioid crisis and contains five…priority areas: monitoring and communication; public education and stigma reduction; manage access; safer storage and disposal; and public safety interventions.” Of these, a municipality such as Edina can most significantly impact a) public education, and b) safer storage and disposal. a) Public education: Of the municipalities reviewed, none were found to have robust programs to educate the public regarding the opioid crisis. Websites present no readily apparent links to opioid education programs. Within the Edina School System, the dominant foci in health classes regarding foreign substances use are alcohol use and vaping. Opioids are not a significant element of the curriculum. As only 1-2 students annually are found to have overt struggles with opioid use, they are provided individual and family counseling, but opioids are not discussed at any length within classrooms.(3) b) Safer storage and disposal: “Safe storage and environmentally sound disposal will help prevent access to opioids by those not prescribed the medication. Frequently, family and friends have easy access to prescription opioids through medicine cabinets and sharing. A majority of persons who misuse opioids go on to use heroin, which is more accessible and less expensive than prescription opioids. Research has shown that adolescents are particularly at risk for misuse and subsequent overdose. Providing patients information on safe home storage and the Page 3 importance of safe and environmentally sound disposal of unused medication lowers the risk of those drugs being abused. Informing the public on medicine disposal (medication drop boxes), medication take-back events, and pharmacy- based medication return programs help reduce non-prescribed access to opioid medications.” (2) Consequently, action items in the 2020 Framework include increasing medicine disposal boxes, providing proper disposal information to area residents, and providing easily available medicine disposal bags. A review of the websites of the municipalities surveyed reveals a general failure to meet the action items: i) No website, including Edina’s, presents easy access to information on either the opioid crisis or appropriate disposal of opiate or other medications. Multiple search terms were required (“medicine disposal”, “drugs”, “opioids”, “medications”) to locate any information, even if available. ii) Communities in general do not make multiple disposal sites available. Edina’s website notes that medications may be disposed of at the Police Station or Fire Station #1 during limited hours. There is no Hennepin County disposal site in Edina. The CVS and Walgreen pharmacies on the 6900 block of York Avenue are the only other disposal sites. Although this information is available on the Edina website, it is difficult to find, and highlights the relative paucity of disposal sites in convenient locations throughout the city. iii) Municipalities may have “Drug Disposal Days”, but they appear to be poorly publicized and, as just once-yearly events, have little impact on efforts to minimize the storage of residual quantities of opiates that may become available to adolescent early users. iv) No municipality, including Edina, makes disposal bags readily available in multiple retail locations (e.g., pharmacies, grocery and convenience stores), nor do municipalities create public education materials, such as widespread posters, to educate the general public of the existence of the crisis, the location of educational materials, the availability of disposal bags, or locations of disposal sites. Page 4 Conclusions: 1) Generally, municipalities, including Edina, are not using city resources to provide highly visible citywide publicity regarding the opioid crisis. 2) Municipal websites, including Edina’s, do not highlight the opioid crisis or make information regarding storage and disposal easily available. Only those determined to locate the information will succeed in virtually all municipal websites. 3) Opioids are not a focus in health classes in the Edina School System. 4) If the Edina City Council views the relative lack of visibility of information and the paucity of medication disposal options for Edina residents as problematic, specific recommendations could be developed as a component of the 2022 Health Commission Work Plan. References: 1. National Institute on Drug Abuse. https://www.drugabuse.gov/drug- topics/trends-statistics/overdose-death-rates, January 29, 2021. 2. Opioid Prevention Steering Committee, Hennepin County. Opioid Response Strategic Framework 2020. https://www.hennepin.us/-/media/hennepinus/your- government/projects-initiatives/documents/opioid-response-strategic- framework-2020.pdf 3. Candi Davenport, Licensed Alcohol and Drug Counselor for the Edina School District, personal communication. Appendix: Minnesota Cities Websites Reviewed Edina: https://www.edinamn.gov Bloomington https://www.bloomingtonmn.gov Eden Prairie https://www.edenprairie.org Golden Valley http://www.goldenvalleymn.gov Hopkins https://www.hopkinsmn.com Minnetonka https://www.minnetonkamn.gov Plymouth https://www.plymouthmn.gov Richfield https://www.richfieldmn.gov St. Louis Park https://www.stlouispark.org Date: August 17, 2021 Agenda Item #: X.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: From:Risi Karim, City Management Fellow Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Human Rights & Relations Commission, June 22, 2021 CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Receive the minutes from the June 22, 2021 Human Rights & Relations Commission meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description 6.22.21 HRRC Minutes Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: July 27, 2021 Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Human Rights & Relations Commission Virtual Meeting, WebEx, June 22, 2021, 7 p.m. I. Call To Order Chair Epstein shared information for virtual meeting guidelines for Commissioners and those watching or listening in to the meeting. Chair Epstein called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering Roll Call: Chair Epstein Commissioners Edwards, Felton, Segall, Ross, Bennett, and Guadarrama; Student Commissioners Lichtenberger and Mirza Staff Present: Heidi Lee, Race & Equity Coordinator and Risi Karim, City Management Fellow Absent: Student Commissioner Borene Late: Commissioner Stringer Moore (7:03pm) and Commissioner Ismail (7:05pm) III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Motion by Commissioner Ross to approve the June 22, 2021 meeting agenda, seconded by Commissioner Segall. Roll call vote. Motion carried. IV. Approval of Meeting Minutes Fellow Karim indicated the following changes to the draft minutes: • Commissioner Guadarrama should be marked absent instead of late for the May 25,2021 meeting. Motion by Commissioner Stringer Moore to approve the May 25, 2021 meeting minutes, seconded by Commissioner Edwards. Roll call vote. Motion carried. V. Reports/Recommendations A. Human Rights & Relations Commission 2021 Work Plan • The Commission discussed the 2021 Work Plan with the following updates: o Initiative #1 – Days of Remembrance Commissioner Stringer Moore shared the following updates with the Commission: - Days of Remembrance will be held on July 29th at 7pm in Edina City Hall - Student Commissioners will work with Staff Liaison Lee on poster design - Staff Liaison Lee will check in with the city’s communications team about taking a headshot for Manny Gabler. - The subcommittee is still waiting on attendance confirmation from Mayor Hovland. o Initiative #2 – Tom Oye Award - No update o Initiative #3 – Sharing Values Sharing Community Event Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: July 27, 2021 - Commissioner Felton shared the following updates with the Commission: - The Stop The Hate event will take place tentatively on Sunday, September 12, 2021, from 3:00 pm – 5:00 pm in the City Council Chambers at City Hall. - The event will highlight the rise in anti-Semitic, anti-Muslim, anti-Asian and the continuous attacks on various marginalized groups that includes but not limited to the LGBTQ+ and Latino community. - Possible panelist for the event will include representatives from the Asian, Muslim, Jewish and African American Community. Motion by Commissioner Felton to approve the subcommittee’s event plan for Stop The Hate, seconded by Commissioner Ross. Roll call vote. Motion carried. o Initiative #4 – Race, Justice, and Policing Community Awareness Plan & Implementation Commissioner Felton shared the following updates with the Commission: - The Community Conversations: Race, Justice and Policing event will be held Sunday, October 17,2021, from 3:00pm-5:00pm in the City Council Chambers at City Hall. - A Member of the Edina Police Department will be asked to assist the subcommittee with the planning of the event. - The event will be hybrid with an option for the community to join the event via live stream from home. Motion by Commissioner Bennett to approve the subcommittee’s event plan for Community Conversations: Race, Justice and Policing, seconded by Commissioner Stringer Moore . Roll call vote. Motion carried. o Initiative #5 – Bias Offense Review - No update o Initiative #6 – Review and comment on a plan developed by P&R and R&E staff - No update B. 2022 Work Plan Development Staff Liaison Lee began the conversation by giving a brief overview of the Boards and Commissions 2022 Work Plan Timeline and Council Charges . • The Commission discussed the 2022 Work Plan and what would be completed, continued or added from this year’s Work Plan. - Commissioner Bennett suggested partnering and supporting the Community Health Commission on initiatives related to mental health and policing. The Initiative could also fall under the scope of Initiative #4 – Race, Justice, and Policing Community Awareness Plan & Implementation. - Commissioner Bennett proposes the Commission revisits the city’s naming policy for public parks and facilities. - Commissioner Segall proposed expanding the scope of initiatives 3 & 4 to include the issue of Ageism in the community. - Commissioner Felton commented that whatever initiatives the Commission decides to move forward with for 2022 that the initiatives should be both impactful and meaningful for members of the community. - Commissioner Bennett suggested the Commission consider developing messaging to bring more awareness to voting rights, voter fraud and other election related policies. - Commissioner Stringer Moore suggested adding an additional event to Initiative 3- Sharing Values Sharing Community Event to include a focus on mental health and available resources. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: July 27, 2021 - Staff Liaison Lee asks members of the Commission to give consideration and rank which initiatives they would like to be apart of as well as which initiative they would be willing to lead. - Staff Liaison Lee will have a draft 2022 Work Plan at the August meeting so the Commission can approve the 2022 Work Plan at the September meeting and go to Council for feedback in October. C. Return to In Person Meetings o Staff Liaison Lee shares that Commission meetings for July and August will be hybrid model. Commissioners can decide to attend the meeting in person or via WebEx. - The September 28th HRRC meeting will be held in person, no virtual option will be available for Commissioners. o Members of the public can also begin attending meetings again and Community Comment will return to the agenda. Speakers must be physically present in the meeting room to participate. They still have the option to provide comments via the website form submittal. VI. Chair and Member Comments • Commissioner Bennett recognizes that Juneteenth has now become a federal holiday and commends the activists who worked to make this happen. Commissioner Bennett also highlights the current attack on voting rights happening in the country and urges elected officials to take a stand on protecting voting rights. • Commissioner Stringer Moore shares an invitation from the Anti-Racism Collective for members of the HRRC who would be interested in marching alongside the Anti-Racism Collective during Edina’s 4th of July parade. • Commissioner Stringer Moore announces that on June 23rd Junita Flowers, local businesswomen and owner of Junita’s Jar and Representative Dean Phillips will be hosting a conversation for the #ShareTheMicMN platform. • Commissioner Segall shares that the Edina League of Women Voters will also be marching alongside the Anti-Racism Collective at the Edina parade. • Commissioner Edwards recognizes that Pride month events will be held in both June and July. • Commissioner Felton thanks city staff and several Commissioners for their aid & support of Initiatives 3 & 4. VII. Staff Comments • Staff Liaison Lee shares that she has reached out to Edina public schools to schedule a meeting with the incoming Superintendent Dr. Stacie Stanley. • Staff Liaison Lee shares that the Just Deeds program was recently approved by the City Council and that staff has begun receiving request from community members to join the initiative. • Staff Liaison Lee shares that the Police Chief selection have concluded the interview phase and will be moving forward with background and reference check for finalist. Adjournment Motion by Commissioner Felton to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Commissioner Segall. Roll call vote. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 9:05p.m. Date: August 17, 2021 Agenda Item #: XIV. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Calendar of City Council Meetings and Events Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None; information only. INTRODUCTION: Please take note of the Thursday City Council meeting on Sept. 9, and the Friday HRA meeting on Sept. 10 because of the Jewish Holiday, Rosh Hashanah, Sept. 6-8. Date Time Meeting/Event Location Tues, Aug. 17 5:30 p.m.2022-2023 City Manager Proposed Budget Community Room 7:00 p.m.City Council Regular Meeting Council Chambers Thurs, Aug. 26 7:30 a.m.Housing and Redevelopment Authority Council Chambers Thurs, Sept 9 NOTE MEETING DAY 5:30 p.m.Transportation Commission / Public Hearing P rocess Community Room 7:00 p.m.City Council Regular Meeting Council Chambers Fri, Sept 10 NOTE MEETING DAY 7:30 a.m.Housing and Redevelopment Authority Council Chambers Tues, Sept 21 5:30 p.m.Boards & Commission Interview Process for 2021 Community Room 7:00 p.m.City Council Regular Meeting Council Chambers Thurs, Sept 23 7:30 a.m.Housing and Redevelopment Authority Council Chambers