Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2021-09-21 City Council Meeting Packet
Agenda City Council Meeting City of Edina, Minnesota Edina City Hall Council Chambers Tuesday, September 21, 2021 7:00 PM Watch the meeting on cable TV or at EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeetings or Facebook.com/EdinaMN. Participate in Community Comment and Public Hearing in person, or Call 800-374-0221. Enter Conference ID 1086418. Give the operator your name, street address and telephone number. Press *1 on your telephone keypad when you would like to get in the queue to speak. A City sta7 member will introduce you when it is your turn. I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Pledge of Allegiance IV.Approval Of Meeting Agenda V.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Mayor will invite residents to share issues or concerns that are not scheduled for a future public hearing. Items that are on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. The City Manager will respond to questions raised during Community Comments at the next meeting. A.City Manager's Response to Community Comments VI.Adoption Of Consent Agenda All agenda items listed on the Consent Agenda will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless requested to be removed by a Council Member. If removed the item will be considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve, unless otherwise noted in consent item.) A.Approve Minutes: Work Session and Regular, September 9, 2021 B.Approve Payment of Claims C.Ordinance No. 2021-12: Amending Chapter 2 Article V of the Edina City Code Concerning O7cers and Employees D.Resolution No. 2021-68: Amending Resolution Nos. 2021-02 Signatory and 2021-07 Facsimile Signatures E.Set December 7, 2021 as the Public Meeting Date for the 2022 Levy and Budget F.Resolution No. 2021-75: Authorizing Driving While Intoxicated O7cer Grant Program Agreement G.Resolution No. 2021-76, Ordinance No. 2021-06; Final Rezoning, Final Development Plan and Site Improvement Plan Agreement for Solhem Companies at 4660 77th Street West H.Request for Purchase: Bridge Deck Crack Sealing I.Request for Purchase: Utley Park Shelter Roof Replacement J.Receive Petition for Sidewalk on West 66th Street K.Approve League of Minnesota Cities Annual Membership Dues L.Approve New On-Sale Wine and 3.2 On-Sale Beer Liquor License for Bojae's LLC dba Bojae's M.Resolution No. 2021-78: Accepting Donations VII.Special Recognitions And Presentations A.Proclamation: Declaring September 17-23 Constitution Week B.Minnesota Recreation & Park Association Awards of Excellence C.2021 "Images of Edina" Presentation VIII.Public Hearings During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after staG and/or applicants make their presentations. The following guidelines are in place to ensure an e7cient, fair, and respectful hearing; limit your testimony to three minutes and to the matter under consideration; the Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary; avoid repeating remarks or points of view made by previous speakers. The use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A.PUBLIC HEARING: New On-Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale Liquor Licenses for Olive's Fresh Pizza Bar Edina, LLC dba Olive's Fresh Pizza Bar Edina IX.Reports/Recommendations: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A.New Consumption & Display Permit for Wooden Hill Brewing Company LLC dba Wooden Hill Brewing Company B.Bristol & Mavelle Park/Lynmar Basin Stormwater Project Concept Plan Summary Report C.Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project: 30% Design Check In D.Resolution 2021-79: Approving ModiKcation No. 4 to Southdale 2 TIF District E.Resolution No. 2021-77: Adopting the Proposed Budget and Establishing the Proposed Tax Levy Payable in 2022 F.Appoint Acting Mayor X.Commission Correspondence (Minutes and Advisory Communication) A.Minutes: Arts & Culture Commission July 22, 2021 B.Minutes: Energy & Environment Commission August 12, 2021 C.Minutes: Human Rights & Relations Commission July 27, 2020 XI.Aviation Noise Update XII.Mayor And Council Comments XIII.Manager's Comments XIV.Calendar of City Council Meetings and Events XV.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampliKcation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:City Manager's Response to Community Comments Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: City Manager Neal will respond to questions asked at the previous council meeting. Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve Minutes: Work Session and Regular, September 9, 2021 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Minutes as presented. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: Draft Work Session, September 9, 2021 Minutes: Draft Regular, September 9, 2021 MINUTES OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION COMMUNITY ROOM, CITY HALL TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 2021 5:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:36 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Anderson, Jackson, Staunton, and Mayor Hovland. Absent: Member Pierce Staff in attendance: Scott Neal, City Manager; Lisa Schaefer, Assistant City Manager; Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner; Chad Millner, Engineering Director; MJ Lamon, Community Engagement Coordinator; Cary Teague, Community Development Director; Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner; Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner; Risi Karim, City Management Fellow; and Sharon Allison, City Clerk. TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION WORK PLAN UPATE The commission discussed two work plan items that they would like to include on their 2022 work plan. Vice chair Jill Plumb-Smith discussed organized trash collection. Plumb-Smith said data showed this was beneficial to haulers and residents. Commissioner Richman discussed a Tree Policy initiative to plant trees in the City’s roadway right-of-way. Richman said they would research and develop a citywide policy that would include plantings, maintenance, removal, and funding. Council provided feedback. Also in attendance were chair Kirk Johnson and Commissioner Janet Kitui. PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS Community Engagement Coordinator Lamon and Assistant City Manager Schaefer presented the current public hearing process that was implemented because of COVID. Council shared that they liked the current process. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:31 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ____________________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by the Edina City Council, September 21, 2021. ___________________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 9, 2021 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m., then asked for a moment of silence for the loss of 2-year-old Iklas Abullahi Ahmed. He shared the City’s condolences with the family then thanked all emergency personnel and community for their efforts to locate this little girl. Mayor Hovland shared the procedure for public hearing and community comment in the hybrid meeting format. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Anderson, Jackson, Staunton, Hovland. Absent: Member Pierce. III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IV. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED AS PRESENTED Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Anderson, to approve the meeting agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT Lori Grotz, 5513 Park Place, requested a COVID-19 update for City Hall that included the number of City staff, vaccination rates, onsite workers, and if vaccination or testing requirements were being required. V.A. CITY MANAGER’S RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY COMMENTS Manager Neal responded to Community Comments from the last meeting. VI. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED AS PRESENTED Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, approving the consent agenda as presented: VI.A. Approve minutes of the Work Session and Regular Meetings of August 17, 2021 VI.B. Approve Claims for Payment for Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated August 20, 2021, totaling $669,513.29; Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated August 27, 2021, totaling $3,474,666.51, and Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated September 3, 2021, totaling $1,721,262.33 VI.C. Adopt Resolution No. 2021-72; Granting City Council Consent for Housing and Redevelopment Authority Levy VI.D. Adopt Resolution No. 21-69; Setting Public Hearing Date for Eden/Willson Tax increment Financing District VI.E. Request for Purchase; Geotechnical Design Services for Blake Road Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Braun Intertec, $28,715 VI.F. Request for Purchase; Design Centennial Lakes building Card Access Improvements, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Pro-Tec Design, $27,622 VI.G. Request for Purchase; Design Services for Replacement of Lift Station No. 6, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Barr Engineering, $225,000 Minutes/Edina City Council/September 9, 2021 Page 2 VI.H. Request for Purchase; Utility and Parks Buildings Energy Improvements, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Pioneer Power, Inc., $250,357 VI.I. Request for Purchase; 2021 Ford Transit Van with Ecoboost Engine, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Kunes Auto Group, $59,985 VI.J. Petition Response for Antrim Road Speed Limit Signs VI.K. Receive Petition for Speed Bump on Wooddale Avenue VI.L. Adopt Resolution No. 2021-70; Approving Joint Powers Agreement with St. Louis Park for Speed Limits on Shared Streets VI.M. Approve Revised Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project Maintenance Plan VI.N. Approve Traffic Safety Report of July 27, 2021 VI.O. Adopt Resolution No. 2021-83; Setting Public Hearing Date for Special Assessment and Delinquent Utilities VI.P. Adopt Resolution No. 2021-74; Accepting Donations Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VII. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS VII.A. EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE EXPLORE EDINA ANNUAL REPORT – ACCEPTED Mr. Neal shared how the City entered into a cooperative agreement with the Edina Chamber of Commerce to account for and allocate the 3% lodging tax charged within the City and to act as the visitor and lodging board for the City. Staff believed the budget was appropriate for the scale of operations. Shelly Loberg, Vice President Edina Chamber of Commerce/Explore Edina, presented their annual report. She stated Explore Edina was established in 2014 and since had developed the Edina Destination Guide, ExploreEdina.com, social channels, and a regional marketing plan. She shared their goal to attract regional, national, and international visitors to Edina as well as support Minneapolis, Bloomington, and Richfield, promote retail and hospitality, and support leisure advertising for Edina lodging properties. She shared 2021- 2022 trends which reflected a small drop domestically but large decrease for overseas due to COVID-19 then shared 2022 highlights that included an all-encompassing strategy to showcase Edina and other elements. Ms. Loberg spoke about how they highlighted City events through a portion of lodging revenue such as the Edina Art Fair then reviewed data on sponsorships, lodging revenue, and a financial review. The Council thanked the Edina Chamber for its work, especially during the pandemic, then confirmed the fashion show event was still being planned. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Anderson, to accept the 2022 Explore Edina annual report as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS - Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VIII.A. NEW CONSUMPTION AND DISPLAY PERMIT FOR WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC DBA WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY – CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 21, 2021 Clerk Allison shared that in January 2020, the Council amended City Code Chapter 4 concerning alcoholic beverages to allow the City to issue consumption and display permits. This amendment was at the request of Wooden Hill Brewing who would like to allow patrons to bring wine and intoxicating beverages to special events, for example, a wedding party would be able to toast with champagne. As a brewer taproom, Wooden Hill’s current license was strictly for brewing and selling its own beer and it was their desire to offer patrons other intoxicating beverage options. She said in early 2020, Wooden Hill applied for a permit but it was put on hold because of COVID. Approval of the permit would allow Wooden Hill to host events where event planners and guests would be able to bring their own intoxicating beverages to events. Beside planned events, Minutes/Edina City Council/September 9, 2021 Page 3 it would be permissible for any patron to bring in intoxicating beverages at any time except between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. She noted from a practical perspective, Wooden Hill might not be able to prevent minors or intoxicated patrons from being served because they would not be the ones doing the serving but said Council could include conditions to this permit. She shared staff concerns that the permit holder was not serving the intoxicating beverages and no police/security presence required. The Council asked if other cities offered this type of permit and clarified this would permit consumption other than beer in order to host some events and if catering was an option. Sean Ewen, Wooden Hill, explained how brewers cannot obtain a separate liquor license but that statute provided for this type of permit and would only be used as part of a special event. He said they were working to offer this type of alcohol service to better accommodate the public then explained the restrictions they would put in place that would include service only in a controlled area in order to obtain proper identification prior to serving and how staff would also circulate as part of their regular work to monitor for signs of over service that would then be addressed. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. Public Testimony None. Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Anderson, to extend the public hearing to noon on September 13, 2021, and take final action on approval of the consumption and display permit for Wooden Hill Brewing Company LLC dba Wooden Hill Brewing Company at the September 21, 2021 City Council meeting. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.B. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-71; RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT VACATION AT 4904 BYWOOD WEST – CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 21, 2021 Director of Engineering Millner said Jeff Engelsma had applied for a vacation of a utility easement at 4904 Bywood West. He said staff would have the resolution and recommendation prepared for the September 21 City Council meeting as discussions were still occurring between the applicant and private utilities on the requirement of easements. The Council confirmed who held the easement and that the City would still maintain access to utilities around the lot if vacated to address any water issues. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:49 p.m. Public Testimony None. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, to extend the public hearing to noon on September 13, 2021, and take final action to adopt Resolution No. 2021-71 Vacating Drainage and Utility Easement for 4904 Bywood West at the September 21, 2021 City Council meeting. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.C. PROPOSED MODIFICATION NO. 4 TO SOUTHDALE 2 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN – CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 21, 2021 Minutes/Edina City Council/September 9, 2021 Page 4 Economic Development Manager Neuendorf said this item pertained to the potential modification to the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Plan. He provided background of the existing TIF district and said the proposed change was limited to the budget only with no change to the boundaries, timeline, or intended outcomes. He summarized the scope of the proposal and outlined the 18 major projects that resulted from this plan and how they used TIF to create affordable housing projects that totaled over $9 million. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:57 p.m. Public Testimony Lori Grotz, 5513 Park Place, addressed the Council. Mr. Neuendorf responded to questions raised during public testimony regarding why some projects were not offered TIF was due to the lack of a financial gap. He explained the $6 million noted in the budget’s line items were targets and not audited but would be budgeted going forward then stated other qualifying improvements included the $5 million loan to Southdale Center Mall and how those funds could be used. Mr. Neal responded further as to why the City contributed TIF which provided an incredible amount of economic development and growth leveraged over the past 10 years for the community. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by member Staunton, to extend the public hearing to noon on September 13, 2021, and take final action to approve proposed Modification No. 4 to Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing Plan at the September 21, 2021 City Council meeting. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IX. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS IX.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-65; APPROVING DRAINAGE RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT VACATION AT 7300 CLAREDON DRIVE – ADOPTED Mr. Millner shared that Gene and Katie Munster applied for a vacation of a drainage and utility easement at 7300 Claredon Drive and that staff recommended approval as the easements were not needed for public purposes and that no comments had been received prior to the public hearing closing on August 30. Member Anderson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2021-65 vacating drainage and utility easement at 7300 Claredon Drive. Member Staunton seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IX.B. SKETCH PLAN FOR 7300 WEST BUSH LAKE ROAD – REVIEWED Community Development Director Teague said the City Council was asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to replace an existing outdoor ice rink with a 22,000 square foot training facility at 7300 West Bush Lake Road. The facility would include an 80’ x 150’ turf area, weight training, hockey specific workout area for skating treadmill and stickhandling area as well as a shooting zone, locker rooms/restrooms, offices and building support rooms. He shared the request in detail and how sidewalks should be included for walkability if the project moved forward. Nick Sperides, Sperides Architects, shared comments regarding the proposed project and the necessary lot split to accomplish this development then noted parking would not be an issue as the property owner also owned the property to the north and will provide an easement for additional parking. He said they understood the need for a parking study to address potential concerns but noted the nearby church also allowed for overflow parking for tournaments up to six times per year. Minutes/Edina City Council/September 9, 2021 Page 5 The Council asked questions regarding removal of the current ice sheet, if ownership would remain the same, and indicated it supported creating youth sport opportunities. The Council spoke about how the existing building would continue to be on the same lot and meet the two-acre minimum and if the property would be part of the upcoming Cahill study. The Council suggested monitoring the study as the applicant moved forward to include sidewalks that would accommodate potential surrounding uses in the future. The Council also shared potential parking concerns and asked the applicant to monitor those throughout this process. Mr. Sperides confirmed the ownership would remain with the exception of possible additional partners, the current ice sheet was outdoors and not a heavy patron-use facility so parking demand would not be high because youth were playing team sports but they would provide historic parking counts as the parking study and plan moved forward. IX.C. FINAL SPENDING PLAN FOR EDINA’S AMERICAN RESCUE ACT PLAN FUNDS ROUND 1 – APPROVED Mr. Neal said staff was requesting the City Council’s approval of the September 9, 2021, Implementation Plan for spending approximately 50% of the City’s total appropriation of American Rescue Act Plan (ARPA) funding. He provided a report with a recounting of the milestones and timeline that shaped the current Plan and was developed by staff with Council and public input components. He shared an update on the Council’s desire to include broadband expansion through these funds but how that would take years to develop but offered an alternative solution through purchase of services of Internet Essentials, which was a well- developed program and could address those concerns. The Council indicated it was pleased to see the Edina Education Fund included in the Plan and asked about metrics for assisting police through mental health support to ensure we could continue to fund the potential hire. The Council asked questions regarding VEAP rental assistance, delays in fund distribution nationwide, how to address that as well as the proposed community health software and bias reporting, and how this would work with the Human Rights and Relations Commission and police data and reporting. Mr. Neal responded the need for funding for the mental health support would be provided if proven to be effective. Staff hoped to use some funds to add staff to address which could include flexibility through staffing or outsourcing through Hennepin County. Staff would explore how data integration between the two software packages could occur. Police Chief Milburn responded to the need for mental health support for officers to provide services for people in crisis as well as officers and how they would incorporate their work with the County and surrounding cities. The Council asked about the use of ARPA funds for the Edina theater and the capacity of VEAP to effectively handle rental assistance requests. Mr. Neal responded funding would be available for the theater but noted the proposed $200,000 amount would not be enough and further requests would be provided. Mr. Neal stated VEAP was a trusted partner but staff would monitor closely any funding provided for efficiency in fund distribution. Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson, to approve the final spending plan for Edina’s American Rescue Act Plan Funds Round 1 as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. X. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS – Received X.A. MINUTES: COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMISSION, JUNE 8 AND JULY 12, 2021 X.B. MINUTES: TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, JULY 15, 2021 X.C. MINUTES: ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION, JULY 22, 2021 XI. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE – Received Minutes/Edina City Council/September 9, 2021 Page 6 XII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received XIII. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received XIII.A. PREP MEMO FOR SEPTEMBER 9 MEETINGS XIV. CALENDAR OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AND EVENTS – Received XV. ADJOURNMENT Member Anderson made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, to adjourn the meeting at 8:50 p.m. Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, September 21, 2021. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the September 9, 2021, meeting available. Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Claims From:Alisha McAndrews, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Approve Payment of Claims Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve claims for payment: Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 09.10.21 TOTAL $1,098,005.63. Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 09.17.21 TOTAL $2,163,265.79. INTRODUCTION: Claims information for approval is attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 09.10.21 TOTAL $1,098,005.63 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 09.17.21 TOTAL $2,163,265.79 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 39 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND SUB FUND DUE TO DUE FR 1000 General 67,661.922500 Conservation & Sustainability 22,132.052600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 3,691.502600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 828.752600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 1,593.752600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 382.504000 Capital Projects 50,245.064200 Equipment Replacement 9,977.514400 PIR Capital Projects 39,072.435100 Art Center 59.345200 Braemar Golf Course 20,109.105200 Braemar Golf Course 260.005300 Aquatic Center 3,440.055400 Edinborough Park 6,180.745500 Braemar Arena 17,883.885600 Braemar Field 270.005700 Centennial Lakes 2,313.825800 Liquor 229,358.285900 Utility Fund 326,682.175900 Utility Fund 49,720.585900 Utility Fund 146,584.866000 Risk Management 63,567.696100 Equipment Operations 30,033.696200 Information Technology 693.276300 Facilities Management 1,407.927100 PS Training Facility 1,813.577200 MN Task Force 1 2,041.209999 Pooled Cash Fund 1,098,005.63 TOTAL 1,098,005.63 1,098,005.63 ** END OF REPORT - Generated by Shirleng Tan Geil ** City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 1 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 464451 09/10/2021 PRTD 151171 7TH STREET BEER COMPANY 1775 08/25/2021 20210910 1,032.00 CHECK 464451 TOTAL: 1,032.00 464452 09/10/2021 PRTD 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 0168311-IN 08/12/2021 20210910 80.14 CHECK 464452 TOTAL: 80.14 464453 09/10/2021 PRTD 143143 ACT CLEANING SERVICE 1728 08/11/2021 20210910 2,724.82 CHECK 464453 TOTAL: 2,724.82 464454 09/10/2021 PRTD 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 911700431 08/23/2021 20210910 113.70 ACUSHNET COMPANY 911708048 08/24/2021 20210910 143.19 ACUSHNET COMPANY 911728467 08/27/2021 20210910 111.40 CHECK 464454 TOTAL: 368.29 464455 09/10/2021 PRTD 140318 ADVANCED ELEMENTS, INC 75907 08/10/2021 20210910 12,782.77 ADVANCED ELEMENTS, INC 75908 08/10/2021 20210910 405.75 ADVANCED ELEMENTS, INC 75791 08/10/2021 20210910 3,591.00 CHECK 464455 TOTAL: 16,779.52 464456 09/10/2021 PRTD 130792 AIRGAS NATIONAL CARBONATION 9116468996 08/13/2021 20210910 344.08 CHECK 464456 TOTAL: 344.08 464457 09/10/2021 PRTD 160095 AM CRAFT SPIRITS SALES & MARKETIN 12933 08/24/2021 20210910 101.29 CHECK 464457 TOTAL: 101.29 464458 09/10/2021 PRTD 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1PHN-PKP6-CKWQ 08/10/2021 20210910 147.91 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1XCK-4JCW-CL7Q 08/11/2021 20210910 24.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1KFW-Q1VJ-C6GY 08/11/2021 20210910 9.18 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1RKM-K16D-C4DW 08/11/2021 20210910 19.18 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1RKM-K16D-9D64 08/11/2021 20210910 17.99 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 2 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 141W-WW4G-H7DC 08/11/2021 20210910 56.78 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1MYJ-4MD9-JTML 08/10/2021 20210910 44.86 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1HQV-LTY1-9MDV 08/12/2021 20210910 44.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1HQV-LTY1-NDXY 08/13/2021 20210910 149.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1QHR-XCTH-RYH9 08/13/2021 20210910 187.96 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1JR3-QJ1M-RFR3 08/14/2021 20210910 24.40 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1C4V-WPFF-DNCM 08/15/2021 20210910 89.02 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 11PR-4LVG-RHRM 08/16/2021 20210910 54.50 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1VMY-TKJN-7DJT 08/17/2021 20210910 28.19 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1VMY-TKJN-DD69 08/18/2021 20210910 212.76 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1FWV-GNG3-FWKD 07/26/2021 20210910 153.99 CHECK 464458 TOTAL: 1,266.68 464459 09/10/2021 PRTD 151441 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 1005117557 08/10/2021 20210910 178.13 CHECK 464459 TOTAL: 178.13 464460 09/10/2021 PRTD 151441 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 1005118746 08/11/2021 20210910 349.71 CHECK 464460 TOTAL: 349.71 464461 09/10/2021 PRTD 151756 ARBEITER BREWING COMPANY LLC 410 08/26/2021 20210910 72.00 ARBEITER BREWING COMPANY LLC 411 08/26/2021 20210910 132.00 ARBEITER BREWING COMPANY LLC 412 08/26/2021 20210910 72.00 CHECK 464461 TOTAL: 276.00 464462 09/10/2021 PRTD 106304 ASPEN MILLS INC 277723 07/23/2021 20210910 38,034.50 ASPEN MILLS INC 278641 08/11/2021 20210910 1,317.95 CHECK 464462 TOTAL: 39,352.45 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 3 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 464463 09/10/2021 PRTD 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA S1405453-080121 08/01/2021 20210910 1,979.87 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA S1406543-080121 08/01/2021 20210910 6,212.44 CHECK 464463 TOTAL: 8,192.31 464464 09/10/2021 PRTD 100636 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 02S31450 08/11/2021 20210910 1,532.38 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 01P38280 06/01/2021 20210910 -187.50 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC T491337 08/13/2020 20210910 -399.07 CHECK 464464 TOTAL: 945.81 464465 09/10/2021 PRTD 100638 BACHMAN'S LANDSCAPING 242894/50 08/13/2021 20210910 561.79 CHECK 464465 TOTAL: 561.79 464466 09/10/2021 PRTD 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0090964200 08/26/2021 20210910 3,691.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0103826300 08/26/2021 20210910 173.29 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0090964500 08/26/2021 20210910 2,437.90 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0090947500 08/26/2021 20210910 89.55 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0103826400 08/26/2021 20210910 85.99 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0090964300 08/26/2021 20210910 7,589.55 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0090948200 08/26/2021 20210910 85.55 CHECK 464466 TOTAL: 14,152.83 464467 09/10/2021 PRTD 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC 4994491 08/12/2021 20210910 468.00 CHECK 464467 TOTAL: 468.00 464468 09/10/2021 PRTD 130922 BI WORLDWIDE ME693493 08/11/2021 20210910 77.00 CHECK 464468 TOTAL: 77.00 464469 09/10/2021 PRTD 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 14065 08/20/2021 20210910 154.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 14129 08/26/2021 20210910 245.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 4 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 464469 TOTAL: 399.00 464470 09/10/2021 PRTD 125268 BLUE COMPACTOR SERVICES LLC 5242A 08/10/2021 20210910 250.00 CHECK 464470 TOTAL: 250.00 464471 09/10/2021 PRTD 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC 0274215 08/13/2021 20210910 2,690.00 CHECK 464471 TOTAL: 2,690.00 464472 09/10/2021 PRTD 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84161264 08/10/2021 20210910 2,043.68 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84163098 08/11/2021 20210910 865.80 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84164933 08/12/2021 20210910 264.00 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84168681 08/16/2021 20210910 919.70 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 435885 06/11/2019 20210910 -109.90 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 437658 07/30/2019 20210910 -191.60 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 70279399 10/03/2019 20210910 -326.99 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 70277404 10/03/2019 20210910 -520.50 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC CREDT000000032272 02/26/2021 20210910 -12.79 CHECK 464472 TOTAL: 2,931.40 464473 09/10/2021 PRTD 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 180281 08/24/2021 20210910 839.75 BOURGET IMPORTS 180277 (York) 08/24/2021 20210910 572.25 BOURGET IMPORTS 180277 (GV) 08/24/2021 20210910 963.50 CHECK 464473 TOTAL: 2,375.50 464474 09/10/2021 PRTD 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340774814 08/25/2021 20210910 3,782.20 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340774816 08/25/2021 20210910 140.55 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340774815 08/25/2021 20210910 1,893.12 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340774818 08/25/2021 20210910 61.46 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 5 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340774817 08/25/2021 20210910 2,542.03 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340690656 08/18/2021 20210910 1,221.78 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340774812 08/25/2021 20210910 181.34 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340774813 08/25/2021 20210910 4,046.50 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340774810 08/25/2021 20210910 4,531.05 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340774811 08/25/2021 20210910 61.46 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340774808 08/25/2021 20210910 584.30 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340774809 08/25/2021 20210910 267.28 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340774794 08/25/2021 20210910 4,299.91 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340774791 08/25/2021 20210910 584.30 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340774792 08/25/2021 20210910 61.46 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340774795 08/25/2021 20210910 77.15 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 340774793 08/25/2021 20210910 4,194.07 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 408928195 08/23/2021 20210910 -161.15 CHECK 464474 TOTAL: 28,368.81 464475 09/10/2021 PRTD 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 340748538 08/17/2021 20210910 1,716.80 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 340748539 08/17/2021 20210910 25.95 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 340748540 08/17/2021 20210910 1,631.30 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 340748532 08/17/2021 20210910 2,876.80 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 340748533 08/17/2021 20210910 249.30 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 340761612 08/18/2021 20210910 7,183.20 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 340748536 08/17/2021 20210910 2,528.80 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 340761611 08/18/2021 20210910 155.70 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 340761605 08/25/2021 20210910 6,741.50 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 340761604 08/18/2021 20210910 485.25 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 340761606 08/18/2021 20210910 556.80 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 6 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 464475 TOTAL: 24,151.40 464476 09/10/2021 PRTD 100648 BERTELSON BROTHERS INC WO-1141735-1 08/16/2021 20210910 5.65 BERTELSON BROTHERS INC WO-1141715-1 08/16/2021 20210910 63.80 BERTELSON BROTHERS INC CP-WO-1131151-1-1 09/02/2021 20210910 -25.99 CHECK 464476 TOTAL: 43.46 464477 09/10/2021 PRTD 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 933574087 07/20/2021 20210910 1,296.00 CALLAWAY GOLF 933578401 07/21/2021 20210910 917.10 CALLAWAY GOLF 933677646 08/13/2021 20210910 168.78 CALLAWAY GOLF 933636678 08/03/2021 20210910 -162.90 CALLAWAY GOLF 933718012 08/24/2021 20210910 -234.00 CALLAWAY GOLF 933707839 08/20/2021 20210910 -225.48 CALLAWAY GOLF 933707840 08/20/2021 20210910 -225.48 CALLAWAY GOLF 933707841 08/20/2021 20210910 -234.96 CHECK 464477 TOTAL: 1,299.06 464478 09/10/2021 PRTD 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2586203 08/20/2021 20210910 5,257.75 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2586202 08/20/2021 20210910 557.25 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2586201 08/20/2021 20210910 1,044.65 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2584539 08/20/2021 20210910 667.50 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2587621 08/24/2021 20210910 5,710.60 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2587623 08/24/2021 20210910 122.48 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2589297 08/26/2021 20210910 -26.63 CHECK 464478 TOTAL: 13,333.60 464479 09/10/2021 PRTD 151132 CARDNO INC 317266 08/16/2021 20210910 12,606.85 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 7 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 464479 TOTAL: 12,606.85 464480 09/10/2021 PRTD 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY C2395424 08/12/2021 20210910 1,232.50 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY C2396074 08/10/2021 20210910 1,160.00 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY C2398912 08/11/2021 20210910 1,232.50 CHECK 464480 TOTAL: 3,625.00 464481 09/10/2021 PRTD 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 4092997720 08/16/2021 20210910 11.78 CINTAS CORPORATION 4092997816 08/16/2021 20210910 23.09 CINTAS CORPORATION 4092997445 08/16/2021 20210910 10.69 CINTAS CORPORATION 4092997827 08/16/2021 20210910 30.25 CINTAS CORPORATION 4092997804 08/16/2021 20210910 34.88 CINTAS CORPORATION 4092997730 08/16/2021 20210910 28.62 CINTAS CORPORATION 4093557027 08/20/2021 20210910 81.48 CHECK 464481 TOTAL: 220.79 464482 09/10/2021 PRTD 101837 CITY OF EDINA COM-2463 08/30/2021 20210910 111.52 CHECK 464482 TOTAL: 111.52 464483 09/10/2021 PRTD 101837 CITY OF EDINA 242 05/04/2021 20210910 503.37 CHECK 464483 TOTAL: 503.37 464484 09/10/2021 PRTD 102165 ROGER CLEVELAND GOLF CO. INC 6306211 NO 03/18/2021 20210910 -2,177.50 ROGER CLEVELAND GOLF CO. INC 6339979 SO 04/07/2021 20210910 20.00 ROGER CLEVELAND GOLF CO. INC 6401016 SO 05/11/2021 20210910 301.60 ROGER CLEVELAND GOLF CO. INC 6509805 SO 07/13/2021 20210910 90.68 ROGER CLEVELAND GOLF CO. INC 6238004 SZ 01/25/2021 20210910 1,706.90 ROGER CLEVELAND GOLF CO. INC 6345229 NO 04/09/2021 20210910 141.06 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 8 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 464484 TOTAL: 82.74 464485 09/10/2021 PRTD 144092 CONCENTRA 103422274 08/12/2021 20210910 124.00 CHECK 464485 TOTAL: 124.00 464486 09/10/2021 PRTD 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC 0210597-IN 08/11/2021 20210910 297.84 CHECK 464486 TOTAL: 297.84 464487 09/10/2021 PRTD 100012 CORE & MAIN P414691 08/13/2021 20210910 1,060.28 CHECK 464487 TOTAL: 1,060.28 464488 09/10/2021 PRTD 140999 CORE-MARK MIDCONTINENT INC 8342712 08/13/2021 20210910 547.75 CHECK 464488 TOTAL: 547.75 464489 09/10/2021 PRTD 160189 COYLE, ANN 1003 08/13/2021 20210910 1,170.00 CHECK 464489 TOTAL: 1,170.00 464490 09/10/2021 PRTD 123653 CROSSTOWN CONCRETE & BRICK PAVING 21578 08/16/2021 20210910 4,480.00 CHECK 464490 TOTAL: 4,480.00 464491 09/10/2021 PRTD 101403 CRYSTEEL MANUFACTURING INC LC00072782 08/16/2021 20210910 60.29 CHECK 464491 TOTAL: 60.29 464492 09/10/2021 PRTD 119214 CUSTOM HOSE TECH 107396 08/11/2021 20210910 934.49 CHECK 464492 TOTAL: 934.49 464493 09/10/2021 PRTD 100726 STEVEN BECKMAN CORPORATION D000013320 08/16/2021 20210910 324.96 CHECK 464493 TOTAL: 324.96 464494 09/10/2021 PRTD 121103 DIRECTV GROUP INC 016523692X210813 08/13/2021 20210910 105.23 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 9 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 464494 TOTAL: 105.23 464495 09/10/2021 PRTD 129718 DREW'S CONCESSIONS LLC 2718 08/13/2021 20210910 890.39 DREW'S CONCESSIONS LLC 2719 08/13/2021 20210910 952.56 CHECK 464495 TOTAL: 1,842.95 464496 09/10/2021 PRTD 145811 EASTLAKE CRAFT BREWERY LLC 1432 08/25/2021 20210910 54.00 CHECK 464496 TOTAL: 54.00 464497 09/10/2021 PRTD 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 848835 08/12/2021 20210910 53.55 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 848836 08/12/2021 20210910 267.75 CHECK 464497 TOTAL: 321.30 464498 09/10/2021 PRTD 143018 ECO WORKS SUPPLY 6231 08/12/2021 20210910 2,182.50 CHECK 464498 TOTAL: 2,182.50 464499 09/10/2021 PRTD 122387 ECOLAB USA INC. 6262978405 08/06/2021 20210910 1,061.62 CHECK 464499 TOTAL: 1,061.62 464500 09/10/2021 PRTD 100049 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES 87947 08/12/2021 20210910 828.75 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES 87948 08/12/2021 20210910 255.00 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES 87949 08/12/2021 20210910 3,062.50 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES 87950 08/12/2021 20210910 1,020.00 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES 87951 08/12/2021 20210910 1,593.75 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES 87952 08/12/2021 20210910 382.50 CHECK 464500 TOTAL: 7,142.50 464501 09/10/2021 PRTD 160062 ELM CREEK BREWING COMPANY E-1286 08/26/2021 20210910 402.00 CHECK 464501 TOTAL: 402.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 10 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 464502 09/10/2021 PRTD 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES JOR21042 08/13/2021 20210910 9,977.51 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES MP070121-52 07/01/2021 20210910 353.97 CHECK 464502 TOTAL: 10,331.48 464503 09/10/2021 PRTD 148012 EVEREST EMERGENCY VEHICLES INC P05697 08/13/2021 20210910 371.71 CHECK 464503 TOTAL: 371.71 464504 09/10/2021 PRTD 100146 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-7078538 08/11/2021 20210910 290.28 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-425134 08/11/2021 20210910 206.99 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-7079130 08/11/2021 20210910 29.58 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-7079975 08/11/2021 20210910 17.97 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-425553 08/16/2021 20210910 153.77 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-425535 08/16/2021 20210910 49.70 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-426047 08/19/2021 20210910 -144.38 CHECK 464504 TOTAL: 603.91 464505 09/10/2021 PRTD 103600 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0480173 08/10/2021 20210910 3,831.12 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0478732 08/12/2021 20210910 124.10 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0479601 08/12/2021 20210910 1,547.84 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0478064 08/13/2021 20210910 5,924.05 CHECK 464505 TOTAL: 11,427.11 464506 09/10/2021 PRTD 141099 FIRST STUDENT INC 194497 08/10/2021 20210910 393.00 CHECK 464506 TOTAL: 393.00 464507 09/10/2021 PRTD 130699 FLEETPRIDE INC 79692935 08/12/2021 20210910 67.18 CHECK 464507 TOTAL: 67.18 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 11 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 464508 09/10/2021 PRTD 142334 FURTHER 008816 08/21 08/05/2021 20210910 1,021.50 CHECK 464508 TOTAL: 1,021.50 464509 09/10/2021 PRTD 102456 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1422992 08/13/2021 20210910 84.00 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1423207 08/16/2021 20210910 184.00 CHECK 464509 TOTAL: 268.00 464510 09/10/2021 PRTD 143192 GATOR GARB INC 83500-1 08/11/2021 20210910 632.45 CHECK 464510 TOTAL: 632.45 464511 09/10/2021 PRTD 101351 GILBERT MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS LL 207588 08/11/2021 20210910 264.25 CHECK 464511 TOTAL: 264.25 464512 09/10/2021 PRTD 101103 WW GRAINGER 9016928013 08/10/2021 20210910 97.69 WW GRAINGER 9019052217 08/11/2021 20210910 41.80 WW GRAINGER 9021273934 08/13/2021 20210910 274.00 WW GRAINGER 9022099965 08/16/2021 20210910 24.94 WW GRAINGER 9023005946 08/16/2021 20210910 32.02 CHECK 464512 TOTAL: 470.45 464513 09/10/2021 PRTD 144412 WINEBOW MN00099169 08/17/2021 20210910 771.00 WINEBOW MN00099572 08/24/2021 20210910 1,248.04 WINEBOW MN00099575 08/24/2021 20210910 1,031.00 WINEBOW MN00099574 08/24/2021 20210910 160.75 WINEBOW MN00099573 08/24/2021 20210910 1,166.52 CHECK 464513 TOTAL: 4,377.31 464514 09/10/2021 PRTD 100790 HACH COMPANY 12594925 08/16/2021 20210910 258.48 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 12 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 464514 TOTAL: 258.48 464515 09/10/2021 PRTD 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC 241568-1 08/10/2021 20210910 75.09 CHECK 464515 TOTAL: 75.09 464516 09/10/2021 PRTD 137677 HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC 220502 08/10/2021 20210910 4,350.00 HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON INC 220504 08/10/2021 20210910 11,571.70 CHECK 464516 TOTAL: 15,921.70 464517 09/10/2021 PRTD 100797 HAWKINS INC 5005847 08/11/2021 20210910 3,084.67 CHECK 464517 TOTAL: 3,084.67 464518 09/10/2021 PRTD 100798 HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIPMENT COMPANY R0066201 08/13/2021 20210910 7,900.00 CHECK 464518 TOTAL: 7,900.00 464519 09/10/2021 PRTD 103085 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000170473 08/16/2021 20210910 27.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000156355 12/01/2020 20210910 145.00 CHECK 464519 TOTAL: 172.00 464520 09/10/2021 PRTD 102079 HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC 16265 08/10/2021 20210910 6,690.00 CHECK 464520 TOTAL: 6,690.00 464521 09/10/2021 PRTD 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 700473480 08/13/2021 20210910 210.89 CHECK 464521 TOTAL: 210.89 464522 09/10/2021 PRTD 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC 437315 08/24/2021 20210910 1,611.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 437312 08/24/2021 20210910 4,108.80 HOHENSTEINS INC 437313 08/24/2021 20210910 121.60 HOHENSTEINS INC 437309 08/24/2021 20210910 4,617.70 HOHENSTEINS INC 437558 08/25/2021 20210910 609.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 13 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 464522 TOTAL: 11,068.10 464523 09/10/2021 PRTD 100417 HORIZON CHEMICAL CO 210729088-ER 08/11/2021 20210910 283.61 CHECK 464523 TOTAL: 283.61 464524 09/10/2021 PRTD 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 104430 08/24/2021 20210910 465.70 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 104431 08/24/2021 20210910 550.65 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 104432 08/24/2021 20210910 304.30 CHECK 464524 TOTAL: 1,320.65 464525 09/10/2021 PRTD 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORPORATION INV275266 08/11/2021 20210910 1,952.71 INDELCO PLASTICS CORPORATION INV275694 08/12/2021 20210910 65.10 INDELCO PLASTICS CORPORATION INV276091 08/13/2021 20210910 47.80 INDELCO PLASTICS CORPORATION INV276092 08/13/2021 20210910 147.84 CHECK 464525 TOTAL: 2,213.45 464526 09/10/2021 PRTD 102157 JEFF ELLIS AND ASSOCIATES INC 20104059 08/10/2021 20210910 30.00 CHECK 464526 TOTAL: 30.00 464527 09/10/2021 PRTD 132592 JF AHERN CO 455840 08/16/2021 20210910 260.00 CHECK 464527 TOTAL: 260.00 464528 09/10/2021 PRTD 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC 188916 08/16/2021 20210910 73.12 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC 188915 08/16/2021 20210910 73.12 CHECK 464528 TOTAL: 146.24 464529 09/10/2021 PRTD 100741 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3211745 08/18/2021 20210910 5,099.20 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3211794 08/25/2021 20210910 2,192.45 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3211797 08/25/2021 20210910 2,141.90 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3211796 08/25/2021 20210910 3,209.45 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 14 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3211795 08/25/2021 20210910 185.85 CHECK 464529 TOTAL: 12,828.85 464530 09/10/2021 PRTD 100835 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3492944 08/26/2021 20210910 1,369.35 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3492946 08/26/2021 20210910 2,211.30 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3492945 08/26/2021 20210910 2,875.30 CHECK 464530 TOTAL: 6,455.95 464531 09/10/2021 PRTD 100835 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6260920 08/26/2021 20210910 831.80 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6260921 08/26/2021 20210910 1,168.91 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6260922 08/26/2021 20210910 162.38 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6260923 08/26/2021 20210910 303.14 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6260924 08/26/2021 20210910 1,185.23 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6260925 08/26/2021 20210910 324.76 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6260940 08/26/2021 20210910 643.47 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6260937 08/26/2021 20210910 1,275.42 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6260938 08/26/2021 20210910 97.70 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6260939 08/26/2021 20210910 920.90 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6260936 08/26/2021 20210910 162.38 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6260935 08/26/2021 20210910 1,392.85 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 640082 08/20/2021 20210910 -18.12 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6260930 08/26/2021 20210910 405.95 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6260929 08/26/2021 20210910 2,646.47 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6260932 08/26/2021 20210910 1,459.16 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6260927 08/26/2021 20210910 1,711.57 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6260928 08/26/2021 20210910 1,154.28 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6260931 08/26/2021 20210910 1,169.85 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 15 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6260926 08/26/2021 20210910 2,273.76 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 640084 08/20/2021 20210910 -12.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 640083 08/20/2021 20210910 -12.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 640085 08/20/2021 20210910 -58.46 CHECK 464531 TOTAL: 19,189.40 464532 09/10/2021 PRTD 100835 WINE MERCHANTS 738975 08/12/2021 20210910 -125.19 WINE MERCHANTS 7344075 08/26/2021 20210910 1,095.14 WINE MERCHANTS 7344076 08/26/2021 20210910 1,647.47 WINE MERCHANTS 7344082 08/26/2021 20210910 1,503.47 WINE MERCHANTS 7344081 08/26/2021 20210910 4,833.32 WINE MERCHANTS 7344080 08/26/2021 20210910 2,438.61 WINE MERCHANTS 7344079 08/26/2021 20210910 48.38 WINE MERCHANTS 7344077 08/26/2021 20210910 486.57 WINE MERCHANTS 7344078 08/26/2021 20210910 143.14 CHECK 464532 TOTAL: 12,070.91 464533 09/10/2021 PRTD 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1875166 08/26/2021 20210910 136.38 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1875167 08/26/2021 20210910 771.58 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1875168 08/26/2021 20210910 297.93 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1875172 08/26/2021 20210910 135.19 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1875173 08/26/2021 20210910 605.95 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1875174 08/26/2021 20210910 614.57 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1875176 08/26/2021 20210910 143.43 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1875177 08/26/2021 20210910 476.33 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1875187 08/26/2021 20210910 659.46 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1875171 08/26/2021 20210910 135.19 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 16 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1875170 08/26/2021 20210910 700.78 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1875191 08/26/2021 20210910 830.87 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1875190 08/26/2021 20210910 2,116.48 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1875188 08/26/2021 20210910 1,564.39 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1875189 08/26/2021 20210910 1,359.91 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1875179 08/26/2021 20210910 2,605.15 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1875184 08/26/2021 20210910 769.74 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1875183 08/26/2021 20210910 746.15 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1875181 08/26/2021 20210910 2,604.99 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1875182 08/26/2021 20210910 3,356.77 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1875180 08/26/2021 20210910 943.39 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1875178 08/26/2021 20210910 1,222.77 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1875175 08/26/2021 20210910 352.87 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1875169 08/26/2021 20210910 685.25 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1876296 08/26/2021 20210910 4,337.10 CHECK 464533 TOTAL: 28,172.62 464534 09/10/2021 PRTD 142504 JOHNSON CONTROLS FIRE PROTECTION 88027332 08/16/2021 20210910 1,075.36 CHECK 464534 TOTAL: 1,075.36 464535 09/10/2021 PRTD 102113 AUDRANN INC 1326950 08/13/2021 20210910 241.96 AUDRANN INC 1327397 08/16/2021 20210910 1,104.66 AUDRANN INC 1327574 08/16/2021 20210910 12.84 CHECK 464535 TOTAL: 1,359.46 464536 09/10/2021 PRTD 160186 JTH HOLDINGS LLC 22136-JTH 08/11/2021 20210910 1,012.05 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 17 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 464536 TOTAL: 1,012.05 464537 09/10/2021 PRTD 103409 KELBRO COMPANY 2666512 08/21/2021 20210910 72.76 KELBRO COMPANY 2666515 08/21/2021 20210910 89.74 KELBRO COMPANY 2667372 08/26/2021 20210910 52.45 KELBRO COMPANY 2667467 08/26/2021 20210910 85.78 CHECK 464537 TOTAL: 300.73 464538 09/10/2021 PRTD 100944 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 137592 08/24/2021 20210910 502.25 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 137593 08/24/2021 20210910 89.25 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 137597 08/24/2021 20210910 872.85 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 137591 08/24/2021 20210910 676.00 CHECK 464538 TOTAL: 2,140.35 464539 09/10/2021 PRTD 151024 LA DONA SBC 4933 08/18/2021 20210910 140.00 LA DONA SBC 4948 08/25/2021 20210910 256.00 CHECK 464539 TOTAL: 396.00 464540 09/10/2021 PRTD 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9308715121 08/16/2021 20210910 574.77 CHECK 464540 TOTAL: 574.77 464541 09/10/2021 PRTD 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 6710 08/10/2021 20210910 20,835.66 CHECK 464541 TOTAL: 20,835.66 464542 09/10/2021 PRTD 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURA 19936 07/21/2021 20210910 30,057.39 CHECK 464542 TOTAL: 30,057.39 464543 09/10/2021 PRTD 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURA 19942 07/21/2021 20210910 12,674.64 CHECK 464543 TOTAL: 12,674.64 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 18 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 464544 09/10/2021 PRTD 135867 LIBATION PROJECT 38334 08/24/2021 20210910 922.50 LIBATION PROJECT 38336 08/24/2021 20210910 380.50 LIBATION PROJECT 38335 08/24/2021 20210910 384.50 CHECK 464544 TOTAL: 1,687.50 464545 09/10/2021 PRTD 101146 LINGO - FORMERLY IMPACT 608799611 08/16/2021 20210910 98.43 LINGO - FORMERLY IMPACT 608793218 06/16/2021 20210910 98.43 LINGO - FORMERLY IMPACT 608786779 04/18/2021 20210910 98.43 CHECK 464545 TOTAL: 295.29 464546 09/10/2021 PRTD 146427 LUCID BREWING LLC 11651 08/25/2021 20210910 134.00 LUCID BREWING LLC 11652 08/25/2021 20210910 192.00 CHECK 464546 TOTAL: 326.00 464547 09/10/2021 PRTD 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT LLC P36652 08/11/2021 20210910 739.06 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT LLC P36661 08/12/2021 20210910 509.03 CHECK 464547 TOTAL: 1,248.09 464548 09/10/2021 PRTD 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 22542881 08/12/2021 20210910 12,245.54 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 22542882 08/12/2021 20210910 2,474.73 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 22513178-1 07/30/2021 20210910 7,092.87 CHECK 464548 TOTAL: 21,813.14 464549 09/10/2021 PRTD 141215 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV631394 08/24/2021 20210910 217.50 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV631387 08/24/2021 20210910 225.54 CHECK 464549 TOTAL: 443.04 464550 09/10/2021 PRTD 130477 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 584927 06/16/2021 20210910 52.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 595375 08/25/2021 20210910 314.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 19 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 595376 08/25/2021 20210910 94.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 595367 08/25/2021 20210910 606.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 595373 08/25/2021 20210910 94.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 595372 08/25/2021 20210910 391.00 CHECK 464550 TOTAL: 1,551.00 464551 09/10/2021 PRTD 142503 MCNAMARA CONTRACTING INC ENG 21-1 #1 08/11/2021 20210910 489,157.93 CHECK 464551 TOTAL: 489,157.93 464552 09/10/2021 PRTD 101483 MENARDS INC 44766 08/11/2021 20210910 473.31 MENARDS INC 45029 08/16/2021 20210910 91.60 MENARDS INC 44833 08/12/2021 20210910 173.33 MENARDS INC 44702 08/10/2021 20210910 69.97 MENARDS INC 44697 08/10/2021 20210910 101.32 MENARDS INC 41280 06/17/2021 20210910 53.58 MENARDS INC 41056-5997 06/14/2021 20210910 29.38 CHECK 464552 TOTAL: 992.49 464553 09/10/2021 PRTD 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD LLC 525076 08/11/2021 20210910 22.99 METROPOLITAN FORD LLC 525075 08/11/2021 20210910 3.75 METROPOLITAN FORD LLC 525047 08/11/2021 20210910 129.80 METROPOLITAN FORD LLC 525039 08/10/2021 20210910 209.00 METROPOLITAN FORD LLC 524948 08/10/2021 20210910 117.23 METROPOLITAN FORD LLC 525085 08/12/2021 20210910 419.10 METROPOLITAN FORD LLC 397616 08/16/2021 20210910 89.95 CHECK 464553 TOTAL: 991.82 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 20 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 464554 09/10/2021 PRTD 138732 TRADITION WINE & SPIRITS LLC 27801 08/24/2021 20210910 326.00 TRADITION WINE & SPIRITS LLC 27800 08/24/2021 20210910 165.00 TRADITION WINE & SPIRITS LLC 27799 08/24/2021 20210910 326.00 CHECK 464554 TOTAL: 817.00 464555 09/10/2021 PRTD 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 20201881 08/16/2021 20210910 336.29 CHECK 464555 TOTAL: 336.29 464556 09/10/2021 PRTD 101684 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOCI 12108 08/12/2021 20210910 750.00 CHECK 464556 TOTAL: 750.00 464557 09/10/2021 PRTD 144066 MIAMA INV110 07/28/2021 20210910 875.00 CHECK 464557 TOTAL: 875.00 464558 09/10/2021 PRTD 128914 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 31600 08/14/2021 20210910 28.50 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 31601 08/14/2021 20210910 50.25 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 31599 08/14/2021 20210910 45.40 CHECK 464558 TOTAL: 124.15 464559 09/10/2021 PRTD 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC E-24608 08/24/2021 20210910 393.00 MODIST BREWING LLC E-24610 08/24/2021 20210910 396.00 MODIST BREWING LLC E-24609 08/24/2021 20210910 280.00 CHECK 464559 TOTAL: 1,069.00 464560 09/10/2021 PRTD 143339 MR CUTTING EDGE 3622 08/16/2021 20210910 90.00 CHECK 464560 TOTAL: 90.00 464561 09/10/2021 PRTD 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1314836-01 08/12/2021 20210910 26.00 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1318857-00 08/12/2021 20210910 23.91 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 21 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 464561 TOTAL: 49.91 464562 09/10/2021 PRTD 160178 MICHAEL TIMOTHY LEUTGEB MUNSON 21CLP0930 08/20/2021 20210910 200.00 CHECK 464562 TOTAL: 200.00 464563 09/10/2021 PRTD 134024 NAGELL APPRAISAL INCORPORATED 29556 08/16/2021 20210910 1,000.00 NAGELL APPRAISAL INCORPORATED 29563 08/16/2021 20210910 1,000.00 CHECK 464563 TOTAL: 2,000.00 464564 09/10/2021 PRTD 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 177476 08/25/2021 20210910 1,624.00 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 177474 08/25/2021 20210910 1,532.00 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 177475 08/25/2021 20210910 1,170.00 CHECK 464564 TOTAL: 4,326.00 464565 09/10/2021 PRTD 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 52725 08/10/2021 20210910 135.96 CHECK 464565 TOTAL: 135.96 464566 09/10/2021 PRTD 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 186855794001 08/13/2021 20210910 162.82 OFFICE DEPOT 189714183001 08/16/2021 20210910 230.78 CHECK 464566 TOTAL: 393.60 464567 09/10/2021 PRTD 999995 Barnwood Group ED169777-REFUND 09/03/2021 20210910 10,000.00 CHECK 464567 TOTAL: 10,000.00 464568 09/10/2021 PRTD 999995 Barnwood Group ED169551-REFUND 09/03/2021 20210910 2,500.00 CHECK 464568 TOTAL: 2,500.00 464569 09/10/2021 PRTD 999995 Bollig And Sons ED187879-REFUND 09/01/2021 20210910 2,500.00 CHECK 464569 TOTAL: 2,500.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 22 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 464570 09/10/2021 PRTD 999994 Great Neighborhood Homes ED190674-REFUND 09/01/2021 20210910 6,965.00 CHECK 464570 TOTAL: 6,965.00 464571 09/10/2021 PRTD 999994 Metro Gas Installers ED189182-REFUND 09/01/2021 20210910 175.20 CHECK 464571 TOTAL: 175.20 464572 09/10/2021 PRTD 999994 WS & D Permit Service Inc ED189830-REFUND 09/01/2021 20210910 247.96 CHECK 464572 TOTAL: 247.96 464573 09/10/2021 PRTD 999996 LARAINE WALKER 23272 08/31/2021 20210910 36.00 CHECK 464573 TOTAL: 36.00 464574 09/10/2021 PRTD 999996 Lynch, Corrine 1254152-REFUND 09/01/2021 20210910 80.64 CHECK 464574 TOTAL: 80.64 464575 09/10/2021 PRTD 999996 Parkerhouse Advisors 220000143278-REFUND.08/30/2021 20210910 96.78 CHECK 464575 TOTAL: 96.78 464576 09/10/2021 PRTD 999996 SUSAN GONZALEZ 23251 09/02/2021 20210910 74.00 CHECK 464576 TOTAL: 74.00 464577 09/10/2021 PRTD 999997 LINDSAY MCCABE 23093 08/31/2021 20210910 330.31 CHECK 464577 TOTAL: 330.31 464578 09/10/2021 PRTD 160026 TED REDMOND 1112 08/13/2021 20210910 6,210.35 CHECK 464578 TOTAL: 6,210.35 464579 09/10/2021 PRTD 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 50267356 08/23/2021 20210910 1,167.40 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 49930959 08/24/2021 20210910 1,412.75 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 48228309 08/20/2021 20210910 467.40 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 23 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 464579 TOTAL: 3,047.55 464580 09/10/2021 PRTD 149249 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-113607 08/19/2021 20210910 322.00 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-114475 08/26/2021 20210910 355.00 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-114476 08/26/2021 20210910 878.50 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-114477 08/26/2021 20210910 259.00 CHECK 464580 TOTAL: 1,814.50 464581 09/10/2021 PRTD 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC 365571 08/15/2021 20210910 2,223.86 CHECK 464581 TOTAL: 2,223.86 464582 09/10/2021 PRTD 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 7190827 08/12/2021 20210910 96.55 CHECK 464582 TOTAL: 96.55 464583 09/10/2021 PRTD 102728 PRECISION LANDSCAPE AND TREE, INC 83529 08/11/2021 20210910 5,800.00 CHECK 464583 TOTAL: 5,800.00 464584 09/10/2021 PRTD 105690 PRO-TEC DESIGN INC 102098 08/11/2021 20210910 357.00 PRO-TEC DESIGN INC 102132 08/16/2021 20210910 485.60 CHECK 464584 TOTAL: 842.60 464585 09/10/2021 PRTD 106322 SCHENCK, DAVID 158877 08/11/2021 20210910 307.25 SCHENCK, DAVID 158899 08/13/2021 20210910 428.21 SCHENCK, DAVID 158911 08/13/2021 20210910 390.75 SCHENCK, DAVID 158944 08/13/2021 20210910 271.12 SCHENCK, DAVID 158942 08/13/2021 20210910 356.31 CHECK 464585 TOTAL: 1,753.64 464586 09/10/2021 PRTD 143618 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-26555 08/25/2021 20210910 395.00 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-26554 08/25/2021 20210910 1,218.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 24 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 464586 TOTAL: 1,613.00 464587 09/10/2021 PRTD 160142 QUINLIVAN & HUGHES, PA 151034 08/11/2021 20210910 2,041.20 CHECK 464587 TOTAL: 2,041.20 464588 09/10/2021 PRTD 138298 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION COMPANY INC K00441584 08/23/2021 20210910 268.00 CHECK 464588 TOTAL: 268.00 464589 09/10/2021 PRTD 132392 RED POWER DIESEL SERVICE 1475 08/16/2021 20210910 1,399.30 CHECK 464589 TOTAL: 1,399.30 464590 09/10/2021 PRTD 133627 REPUBLIC SERVICES #894 0894-005484031 08/25/2021 20210910 2,975.27 CHECK 464590 TOTAL: 2,975.27 464591 09/10/2021 PRTD 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 82764 08/12/2021 20210910 200.00 CHECK 464591 TOTAL: 200.00 464592 09/10/2021 PRTD 101659 ORKIN 214283306 08/10/2021 20210910 63.00 CHECK 464592 TOTAL: 63.00 464593 09/10/2021 PRTD 103283 SAINT CROIX RECREATION FUN PLAYGR 20951 08/11/2021 20210910 4,516.05 CHECK 464593 TOTAL: 4,516.05 464594 09/10/2021 PRTD 144553 SALTCO LLC 68642 08/15/2021 20210910 70.00 CHECK 464594 TOTAL: 70.00 464595 09/10/2021 PRTD 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC 153141 08/10/2021 20210910 322.70 CHECK 464595 TOTAL: 322.70 464596 09/10/2021 PRTD 132210 RUSCIANO GROUP 66995 08/13/2021 20210910 755.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 25 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 464596 TOTAL: 755.00 464597 09/10/2021 PRTD 100995 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 410555 08/12/2011 20210910 2,527.65 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 410263 08/11/2021 20210910 786.14 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 410264 08/11/2021 20210910 780.00 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 410265 08/11/2021 20210910 262.86 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 410266 08/11/2021 20210910 402.27 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 410267 08/11/2021 20210910 840.45 CHECK 464597 TOTAL: 5,599.37 464598 09/10/2021 PRTD 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 112002858-001 08/12/2021 20210910 284.36 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 112101221-001 08/16/2021 20210910 16.05 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 112038414-001 - New 08/13/2021 20210910 8.01 CHECK 464598 TOTAL: 308.42 464599 09/10/2021 PRTD 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL ARV/49285528 08/13/2021 20210910 140.60 CHECK 464599 TOTAL: 140.60 464600 09/10/2021 PRTD 101000 RJM PRINTING INC 117230012 08/10/2021 20210910 62.26 RJM PRINTING INC 117231012 08/11/2021 20210910 132.53 CHECK 464600 TOTAL: 194.79 464601 09/10/2021 PRTD 127878 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2117958 08/25/2021 20210910 193.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2117962 08/25/2021 20210910 98.40 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2117959 08/25/2021 20210910 1,740.50 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2117961 08/25/2021 20210910 1,982.70 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2117960 08/25/2021 20210910 996.46 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2117954 08/25/2021 20210910 1,121.00 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2117951 08/25/2021 20210910 1,268.54 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 26 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2117950 08/25/2021 20210910 1,982.70 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2117945 08/25/2021 20210910 1,740.50 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2117948 08/25/2021 20210910 228.00 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2117944 08/25/2021 20210910 96.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2117949 08/25/2021 20210910 219.20 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2117947 08/25/2021 20210910 972.00 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2117956 08/25/2021 20210910 1,982.70 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2117952 08/25/2021 20210910 193.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2117957 08/25/2021 20210910 606.20 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2117955 08/25/2021 20210910 278.00 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2117953 08/25/2021 20210910 1,740.50 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2117946 08/26/2021 20210910 169.60 CHECK 464601 TOTAL: 17,611.00 464602 09/10/2021 PRTD 101004 SPS COMPANIES INC S4511498.001 08/13/2021 20210910 154.29 CHECK 464602 TOTAL: 154.29 464603 09/10/2021 PRTD 146960 STACKED DECK BREWING 003041 08/26/2021 20210910 232.00 CHECK 464603 TOTAL: 232.00 464604 09/10/2021 PRTD 145599 SSI MN TRANCHE 1 LLC 18397 08/16/2021 20210910 7,492.63 CHECK 464604 TOTAL: 7,492.63 464605 09/10/2021 PRTD 139006 OFFICE OF MNIT SERVICES W21070639 08/13/2021 20210910 21.90 CHECK 464605 TOTAL: 21.90 464606 09/10/2021 PRTD 139006 OFFICE OF MNIT SERVICES W21070565 08/13/2021 20210910 3,902.89 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 27 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 464606 TOTAL: 3,902.89 464607 09/10/2021 PRTD 139006 OFFICE OF MNIT SERVICES W21070568 08/13/2021 20210910 308.70 CHECK 464607 TOTAL: 308.70 464608 09/10/2021 PRTD 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 41815 08/25/2021 20210910 165.00 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 41813 08/25/2021 20210910 372.00 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 41814 08/25/2021 20210910 198.00 CHECK 464608 TOTAL: 735.00 464609 09/10/2021 PRTD 101015 STREICHERS INC I1518746 08/13/2021 20210910 39.99 STREICHERS INC I1518930 08/14/2021 20210910 70.98 CHECK 464609 TOTAL: 110.97 464610 09/10/2021 PRTD 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 172870 08/12/2021 20210910 69.38 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 173175 08/13/2021 20210910 57.02 CHECK 464610 TOTAL: 126.40 464611 09/10/2021 PRTD 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC DB 3059784 08/10/2021 20210910 665.00 CHECK 464611 TOTAL: 665.00 464612 09/10/2021 PRTD 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA INC 347605751 08/11/2021 20210910 981.39 SYSCO MINNESOTA INC 347609248 08/13/2021 20210910 1,032.42 SYSCO MINNESOTA INC 347612183 08/16/2021 20210910 86.30 CHECK 464612 TOTAL: 2,100.11 464613 09/10/2021 PRTD 106673 TAPCO I704990 08/16/2021 20210910 1,425.00 CHECK 464613 TOTAL: 1,425.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 28 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 464614 09/10/2021 PRTD 104932 TAYLOR MADE 35223427 07/22/2021 20210910 417.14 TAYLOR MADE 35207636 07/17/2021 20210910 1,449.60 CHECK 464614 TOTAL: 1,866.74 464615 09/10/2021 PRTD 115343 TEEMARK INC 25197 08/16/2021 20210910 208.62 CHECK 464615 TOTAL: 208.62 464616 09/10/2021 PRTD 117042 THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT 38304 08/15/2021 20210910 1,458.00 CHECK 464616 TOTAL: 1,458.00 464617 09/10/2021 PRTD 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL IN M26645 08/13/2021 20210910 1,000.00 CHECK 464617 TOTAL: 1,000.00 464618 09/10/2021 PRTD 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 5016395302 08/16/2021 20210910 200.14 CHECK 464618 TOTAL: 200.14 464619 09/10/2021 PRTD 104064 TRANS UNION RISK AND ALTERNATIVE 269634-202106-1 07/01/2021 20210910 230.30 TRANS UNION RISK AND ALTERNATIVE 269634-202107-1 08/01/2021 20210910 267.80 CHECK 464619 TOTAL: 498.10 464620 09/10/2021 PRTD 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE COMPANY INC PSI2062197 08/17/2021 20210910 2,400.00 TWIN CITY HARDWARE COMPANY INC PSI2062195 08/17/2021 20210910 3,530.00 CHECK 464620 TOTAL: 5,930.00 464621 09/10/2021 PRTD 101049 UHL COMPANY INC 34796 08/11/2021 20210910 473.40 UHL COMPANY INC 34702 08/02/2021 20210910 678.60 CHECK 464621 TOTAL: 1,152.00 464622 09/10/2021 PRTD 103973 ULINE INC 137414437 08/16/2021 20210910 224.89 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 29 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 464622 TOTAL: 224.89 464623 09/10/2021 PRTD 131957 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC, LLC 150-0056457-01 08/11/2021 20210910 84.99 CHECK 464623 TOTAL: 84.99 464624 09/10/2021 PRTD 100050 USPS 23411 09/03/2021 20210910 149.47 CHECK 464624 TOTAL: 149.47 464625 09/10/2021 PRTD 103590 VALLEY-RICH COMPANY INC 29807 08/04/2021 20210910 5,217.52 CHECK 464625 TOTAL: 5,217.52 464626 09/10/2021 PRTD 144209 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 2787 08/25/2021 20210910 162.00 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 36716 08/25/2021 20210910 585.00 CHECK 464626 TOTAL: 747.00 464627 09/10/2021 PRTD 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES 66123 08/12/2021 20210910 416.54 VERSATILE VEHICLES 66210 08/13/2021 20210910 136.63 CHECK 464627 TOTAL: 553.17 464628 09/10/2021 PRTD 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S004984946.001 08/13/2021 20210910 112.14 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S004985199.001 08/13/2021 20210910 129.99 CHECK 464628 TOTAL: 242.13 464629 09/10/2021 PRTD 119454 VINOCOPIA INC 0285617-IN 08/26/2021 20210910 915.25 VINOCOPIA INC 0285618-IN 08/26/2021 20210910 296.50 VINOCOPIA INC 0285634-IN 08/26/2021 20210910 132.00 VINOCOPIA INC 0285630-IN 08/26/2021 20210910 371.75 VINOCOPIA INC 0285631-IN 08/26/2021 20210910 355.75 VINOCOPIA INC 0285623-IN 08/26/2021 20210910 874.00 VINOCOPIA INC 0285621-IN 08/26/2021 20210910 391.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 30 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET VINOCOPIA INC 0285620-IN 08/26/2021 20210910 57.25 VINOCOPIA INC 0285622-IN 08/26/2021 20210910 127.50 CHECK 464629 TOTAL: 3,521.50 464630 09/10/2021 PRTD 120627 PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP INC 61579397 08/13/2021 20210910 1,268.00 CHECK 464630 TOTAL: 1,268.00 464631 09/10/2021 PRTD 100571 VOGEL PAINT INC 802202040 08/11/2021 20210910 3,370.40 CHECK 464631 TOTAL: 3,370.40 464632 09/10/2021 PRTD 133629 VON HANSONS MEATS SHAKOPEE INC 117491 08/12/2021 20210910 236.22 CHECK 464632 TOTAL: 236.22 464633 09/10/2021 PRTD 143468 VONDENKAMP, MARK 000935 08/23/2021 20210910 144.00 CHECK 464633 TOTAL: 144.00 464634 09/10/2021 PRTD 132751 WARNING LITES OF MINNESOTA 230030 08/12/2021 20210910 489.60 CHECK 464634 TOTAL: 489.60 464635 09/10/2021 PRTD 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICES INC 11557 08/13/2021 20210910 161.80 CHECK 464635 TOTAL: 161.80 464636 09/10/2021 PRTD 101033 WINE COMPANY 181492 08/25/2021 20210910 2,969.60 WINE COMPANY 181493 08/25/2021 20210910 2,656.17 CHECK 464636 TOTAL: 5,625.77 464637 09/10/2021 PRTD 130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 64643353 08/17/2021 20210910 1,532.23 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 64651088 08/23/2021 20210910 -513.52 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 64580681 - Taxes 09/07/2021 20210910 67.92 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 09/09/2021 12:37User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 31 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 464637 TOTAL: 1,086.63 464638 09/10/2021 PRTD 142162 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 2928 08/19/2021 20210910 221.40 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 2927 08/19/2021 20210910 197.10 CHECK 464638 TOTAL: 418.50 464639 09/10/2021 PRTD 127774 WORLDWIDE CELLARS INC R21-53370 08/17/2021 20210910 818.38 CHECK 464639 TOTAL: 818.38 464640 09/10/2021 PRTD 160077 YETI HOLDINGS, INC 991249506 08/13/2021 20210910 129.99 CHECK 464640 TOTAL: 129.99 464641 09/10/2021 PRTD 101091 ZIEGLER INC IN000207011 08/11/2021 20210910 18.90 CHECK 464641 TOTAL: 18.90 NUMBER OF CHECKS 191 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** 1,098,005.63 COUNT AMOUNT TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS 191 1,098,005.63 *** GRAND TOTAL *** 1,098,005.63 Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Scott H. Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Ordinance No. 2021-12: Amending Chapter 2 Article V of the Edina City Code Concerning Officers and Employees Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt First Reading of Ord. No. 2021-12 Establishing Deputy Treasurer Position. INTRODUCTION: To allow for the continuity of services provided by the Finance Department staff is recommending that the position of Deputy Treasurer be created. ATTACHMENTS: Description Ordinance No. 2021-12 194601v1 ORDINANCE NO. 2021-12 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE V OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 2, Article V of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following provision: DIVISION 5. – DEPUTY CITY TREASURER [13] Footnotes: --- (13) --- State Law reference— Duties of treasurer, Minn. Stats. §§ 412.141, 412.681; duties of clerk, Minn. Stats. §§ 412.151, 412.681; duties may be combined, Minn. Stats. § 412.681. Sec. 2-548. – Establishment. The office of deputy city treasurer is hereby established. Sec. 2-549. - Duties of deputy city treasurer. The deputy city treasurer may discharge any of the duties of the city treasurer as prescribed by state law and by the city manager. State Law reference— Duties of treasurer, Minn. Stats. §§ 412.141, 412.681; duties of clerk, Minn. Stats. §§ 412.151, 412.681; duties may be combined, Minn. Stats. § 412.681. Section 2. This ordinance is effective immediately upon enactment. First Reading: September 21, 2021 Second Reading: October 5, 2021 Published: 2 194601v1 ATTEST: ____________________________________ ____________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 21, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of ____________, 2021. __________________________________________ City Clerk Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Scott Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-68: Amending Resolution Nos. 2021-02 Signatory and 2021-07 Facsimile Signatures Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2021-68 Amending Resolution Nos. 2021-02 Signatory and 2021-07 Facsimile Signatures for public officials. INTRODUCTION: The Council must adopt a Resolution authorizing the use of facsimile signatures by the Mayor, Manager, Treasurer and Deputy Treasurer on checks, drafts, warrants, vouchers, etc., or other orders by public funds deposited with the City's banks. The amendment is necessary to add new Finance Director Alisha McAndrews and the position of deputy treasurer. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-68: Amending Resolution Nos. 2021-02 Signatory and 2021-07 Facsimile Signatures RESOLUTION NO. 2021-68 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 2021-02 SIGNATORY AND RESOLUTION NO. 2021-07 FACSIMILE SIGNATURES WHEREAS, on January 5, 2021, Resolution No. 2021-02 approved persons holding office as Mayor, Manager and Treasurer authorizing them to transact banking business; and WHEREAS, on January 5, 2021, Resolution No. 2021-07 authorized use of facsimile signatures by public officials as James B. Hovland, Mayor; Don Uram, Treasurer; and Scott H. Neal, City Manager; and WHEREAS, a new finance director was hired recently and for the continuity of services, the position of Deputy Treasurer was created; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council amends Resolution Nos. 2021-02 to include persons holding office as Mayor, Manager, Treasurer and Deputy Treasurer, and Resolution No. 2021-07 facsimile signatures as James B. Hovland, Mayor; Alisha McAndrews, Treasurer; Don Uram, Deputy Treasurer; and Scott H. Neal, City Manager Dated: September 21, 2021 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 21, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _______ day of __________________, 2021. City Clerk Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Scott H. Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Set December 7, 2021 as the Public Meeting Date for the 2022 Levy and Budget Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Set December 7, 2021 as the public meeting date for the 2022 Levy and Budget. INTRODUCTION: M.S. 275.065 requires that the City adopt a proposed budget and levy and certify the proposed levy to the county auditor by September 30. The county auditor will use this information to prepare and send parcel specific notices between November 11 and November 24. The statute also requires that the City shall announce the time and place of the meeting when the budget and levy will be discussed and public input allowed. This public input must occur after November 24 and must start at or after 6 p.m. The time and place of the public input meeting must be included in the minutes but newspaper publication of the minutes is not required. The City is also required to certify the final property tax levy to the county auditor by December 27, 2021. T he final levy may be less than or equal to, but not higher than the preliminary levy. Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Todd Milburn, Chief of Police Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-75: Authorizing Driving While Intoxicated Officer Grant Program Agreement Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2021-75 authorizing the Driving While Intoxicated Officer Grant Program Agreement. INTRODUCTION: The Edina P olice Department has been the recipient of an Officer of Traffic Safety DWI Officer grant for the past six years and three different officers have had the opportunity to work this position throughout that time. This position has allowed these officers to become Drug Recognition Evaluators (DRE’s) and the department DWI and Drugged driving arrests have increased significantly since this position became available at the department. T he DWI Officer position averages over 140 DWI arrests per year in an effort to keep the roads in Edina safe. Our DWI officers educate the community on their role within the police department and the current DWI Officer has spoken at community events held at the Edina High School. When our DWI officer is not making arrests, they are still making up to 20 contacts per shift with community members and those traveling through Edina. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-75: Authorizing Driving While Intoxicated Officer Grant Program Agreement 2022 DWI Officer Grant Agreement RESOLUTION NO. 2021-75 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT DWI ENFORCEMENT OFFICER GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Chief of the Edina Police Department is hereby authorized to execute such agreements and amendments as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the Edina Police Department and to be the fiscal agent and administrator of the grant. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina hereby declares its commitment to enter into a grant agreement with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Minnesota, for the project entitled 2022 Office of Traffic Safety DWI Officer Grant Program. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the 2022 Office of Traffic Safety DWI Officer Grant Program be effective during the period October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2022. Adopted this 21st day of September, 2021 City Clerk Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 21, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _______ day of ________________, 2021. Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.G. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-76, Ordinance No. 2021-06; Final Rezoning, Final Development Plan and Site Improvement Plan Agreement for Solhem Companies at 4660 77th Street West Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2021-76, Ordinance No. 2021-06 and Site Improvement Plan Agreement. INTRODUCTION: This is the final approval for the P entagon North housing project, proposed by Solhem P roperties. T he applicant is proposing to tear down the existing two office buildings on the site and construct a 5-7 story, 408-unit apartment. The final plans are consistent with the approved preliminary plans. T he City Attorney has drafted the Site Improvement Plan Agreement, and the applicant is agreeable to all the conditions. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-76 Ordinance No. 2021-06 Site Improvement Plan Agreement (SIPA) Final Plans Approved Preliminary Plans Building Plans Sustainability Questionnaire All Previous Staff Memos/Reports RESOLUTION NO. 2021-76 APPROVING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, FINAL REZONING FROM MDD-6, MIXED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT-6 TO PUD-23, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT – 23, AND SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN AGREEMENT AT 4660 77TH STREET WEST BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 The applicant is proposing to tear down the existing two office buildings on the site and construct a 5-7 story, 408-unit apartment. 1.02 This site was rezoned to Mixed Development District – 6 (MDD-6) in 2008 as part of rezoning of all of Pentagon Park; however, no development ever took place. The MDD zoning designation was used before the City established PUD Zoning in 2011. There was to be a mixture of office and residential uses. The subject property was specifically contemplated for multi-family residential housing. Pentagon Village was part of this MDD-6 District and was where the office and retail uses were to be located. However, that site was recently rezoned to PUD, and is no longer part of the MDD. 1.03 The property is legally described as follows: Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1218, Hennepin County Minn. 1.04 To accommodate the request, the following is required: 1. A Rezoning from MDD-6, Mixed Development District to PUD, Planned Unit Development, and 2. Final Development Plan. 1.05 On May 26, 2021 after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the requests. Vote: 8 Ayes and 0 Nays. 1.06 On July 21, 2021 the City Council approved the request. Vote: 5 Ayes and 0 Nays. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses, and density are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the existing Zoning on the site. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-76 Page 2 2. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The PUD zoning would: a. Promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City. c. Provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements include sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street. d. Project is of high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned. e. Maintains the efficiency of public streets and utilities. f. Provides a mixture of land uses within the development. g. Project would meet the City’s affordable housing policy. 3. The PUD would ensure that the development proposed would be the only building that would be allowed on the site unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council and ensures the buy-in funds to provide affordable housing elsewhere in the City of Edina. 4. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Per the Office Residential Land Use Description: Primary uses are offices, attached or multifamily housing. b. Façade Articulation. Primary facades should be designed with a well-defined base, middle and top, providing visual interest at ground level. Building entries and access points should be clearly visible from the primary street. Long building facades should be divided into smaller increments using contrasting materials, textures, detailing, setbacks, or similar techniques. c. Building Height Transitions. Taller buildings (generally four stories or higher) should step down to provide a height transition to surrounding residential buildings, including buildings across a street or pathway, and to avoid excessive shadowing of sidewalks, parks, and public spaces. d. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods and key destinations, and with other communities, to improve multimodal transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on cars. 6. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. Wenck Consulting conducted a traffic and parking impact study and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. 7. The proposed height of seven stories is reasonable for this site. To provide affordable housing elsewhere in the City in providing the buy in monies, additional height is needed to create more market rate units to help absorb the cost of the affordable housing units. The building height overlay district limits this site to four stories. The nearest single-family home to this site is 700 feet to the north. Section 36-618 (6) of the City Code requires that buildings that RESOLUTION NO. 2021-76 Page 3 are 7 stories tall, be setback 4 times the height of the building from the 7-story portion of the building to the nearest single-family lot line. The building would be 86 feet tall, therefore, a 344-foot setback is required. Note that the building height steps down toward the Park. 8. The proposed uses would be an upgrade to the current development on the site. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Final Rezoning from MDD-6 to PUD, Planned Unit Development District, Final Development Plan, and Site Improvement Plan Agreement for 4660 77th Street West. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Plans must be consistent with the Final Development Plans dated April 22 and September 9, 2021. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. A Developer’s Agreement/Site Improvement Plan Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 8. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant/developer must pay the buy-in amount for affordable housing of $4.1 million dollars for the City of Edina to provide affordable housing elsewhere in the City. 9. Compliance with all the conditions outlined in the engineering memo dated May 27, 2021. 10. Compliance with the Wenck Consulting Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. 11. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment revising the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-76 Page 4 12. Dedication of public access easement over the north-south sidewalk along the east side of the property and the east west sidewalk along 77th Street. The north-south sidewalk must be widened from 5 feet to 8 feet wide, and maintenance shall be the property owner’s responsibility. The City will maintain the sidewalk along 77th Street. The boulevard between the street and the sidewalk shall be 10 feet. 13. The Maintenance of sidewalks internal to the site to be responsibility of property owner. 14. Submittal of a construction management plan subject to review and approval of city staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 15. Hours of construction must be consistent with City Code. 16. Compliance with the Sustainability Questionnaire. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-76 Page 5 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on September 21, 2021. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2021. _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 2021-06 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD PUD-23, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-23, AT 4660 77th STREET WEST The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended to add the following: Sec. 36-505 Planned Unit Development District-23 (PUD-23) – Pentagon Park Apartments (a) Legal description: Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1218 Hennepin County Minnesota. (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans, including the master development plan for the site received by the City on April 22 and September 9, 2021 except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2021-76 on file in the Office of the Planning Department. (c) Principal Uses: Office & Medical Office Multifamily Residential (d) Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the PCD-1 Zoning District. (e) Conditional Uses: None (f) Development Standards. Standard Building Setbacks Front – 77th Street Rear – Fred Richards Park Side – West Side – East 40--50 feet 20 feet 50 feet 45 feet 2 Building Height 5-7 stories & 52-86 feet Density 75 units per acre Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.5% Parking 550 spaces (g) Signs shall be regulated per the PCD-1 Zoning District for the retail uses, and PRD, for the residential uses. Signs shown on the final development plans shall be allowed. Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: ______________________________ _____________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk 3 CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 21, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of ____________, 2021. ________________________________ City Clerk 1 217893v1 (reserved for recording information) SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT CITY OF EDINA 4660 77TH STREET WEST / PENTAGON PARK NORTH THIS SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) dated September 21, 2021, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”) and PENTAGON ONE LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Developer”). 1. BACKGROUND. A. Developer has applied to redevelop Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1218, Hennepin County Minnesota (torrens COT 1526360), in the City of Edina, State of Minnesota (“Subject Property”). The Developer is seeking City approval to amend the Development Agreement to tear down the two existing office building and construct a 5-7 story, 408-unit apartment complex (the “Project”). B. The City has rezoned the Subject Property from MDD-6, Mixed Development District, to a Planned Unit Development (“PUD”). The Project is in accordance with the PUD and meets the PUD criteria. A Site Improvement Performance Agreement is required for the PUD. 2 217893v1 2. RIGHT TO PROCEED. On the Subject Property, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: (1) this Agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with both the City Clerk and the Hennepin County Registrar’s Office, (2) the required security has been received by the City, and (3) the required insurance certificate has been received by the City. 3. PLANS. The Subject Property shall be developed in accordance with the following Plans which are on file with the City. The Plans shall not be attached to this Agreement. If the Plans vary from the written terms of this Agreement, the written terms shall control. The Plans are: Existing Conditions and Removal Plans dated September 9, 2021 prepared by Civil Site Group. Site Plan dated September 9, 2021 prepared by Civil Site Group. Erosion Control Plan dated September 9, 2021 prepared by Civil Site Group. Final Development Plan dated September 9, 2021 prepared by Civil Site Group. Utility Plans dated September 9, 2021 prepared by Civil Site Group. Details Plan dated September 9, 2021 prepared by Civil Site Group. Design and Building Plan dated April 22 prepared by BKV Group Final Landscape Plan September 9, 2021 prepared by Civil Site Group. Final Lighting Plan dated September 9, 2021 prepared by Civil Site Group. Parking Plan dated April 22 prepared by BKV Group. Sidewalk and Pedestrian Plan September 9, 2021 prepared by Civil Site Group. Bike Racks and Bike Parking Stalls Plan dated September 9, 2021 prepared by Civil Site Group. Traffic Impact Study dated May 20, 2021 prepared by Wenck Associates The Developer may request changes to the Plans. For Plan changes deemed minor, pursuant to City ordinances, changes can be reviewed and approved by City staff. All other Plan changes shall require approval by the City Council. 4. EROSION CONTROL. Prior to initiating construction, the Erosion Control Plan shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control obligations if they would be reasonable and beneficial. All areas 3 217893v1 disturbed by the grading operations shall be stabilized per the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (“MPCA”) Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity. Seed shall be in accordance with the City's current seeding specification, which may include temporary seed to provide ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the MPCA Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity or with the Erosion Control Plan or any schedule of supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within thirty (30) days of receipt of notice thereof, the City may draw on the letter of credit to pay any costs. No development or utility construction will be allowed on the Subject Property and no building permits will be issued for the Subject Property unless the Subject Property is in full compliance with the approved Erosion Control Plan. 5. LICENSE. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Subject Property to perform (a) all work permitted to be performed by the City under this Agreement, and (b) all inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site development. 6. CONSTRUCTION ACCESS. Construction traffic access and egress must be in accordance with the Construction Management Plan, which will be provided by the Developer and approved by the City prior to the commencement of construction. 4 217893v1 7. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY/HOURS. Grading, construction activity, and the use of power equipment are prohibited between the hours of 9 o’clock p.m. and 7 o’clock a.m. and must be consistent with City Code. The City may, at the City’s discretion and at the Developer’s expense, not to exceed $2,500, have one or more City inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a part-time basis. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all instructions received from the City’s inspectors. The Developer’s engineer shall provide for on- site project management. The Developer’s engineer is responsible for design changes and contract administration between the Developer and the Developer’s contractor. The Developer or its engineer shall schedule a pre-construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. 8. DEWATERING. Due to the variable nature of groundwater levels and stormwater flows, it is the Developer’s responsibility to satisfy itself with regard to the elevation of groundwater and to perform any necessary dewatering and storm flow routing. All dewatering shall be in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. 9. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install the Public Improvements within thirty (30) months after issuance of the necessary permits for the Public Improvements. 10. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Agreement and final acceptance by the City Engineer, the Public Improvements shall become City property without further notice or action. Prior to acceptance of the Public Improvements by the City, the Developer must furnish the following affidavits: Contractor’s Certificate Engineer’s Certificate Developer’s Certificate 5 217893v1 certifying that all construction has been completed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Upon receipt of affidavits and verification by the City Engineer, the City Engineer will accept the completed Public Improvements. Within thirty (30) days after the acceptance of the Public Improvements and before the security is released, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible record drawings. The City’s standard specifications for utility construction identify the procedures for final acceptance of utilities. 11. CLEAN UP. Within 24 hours the Developer shall clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, subcontractors, their agents or assigns. Prior to any construction in the Subject Property, the Developer shall identify in writing a responsible party for erosion control, street cleaning, and street sweeping. 12. CITY ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION. The Developer shall pay for in-house engineering administration ($2,500). City in-house engineering administration will include monitoring of construction observation, consultation with Developer and its engineer on status or problems regarding the Project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, Project monitoring during the warranty period, final inspection and acceptance, and processing of requests for reduction in security. 13. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement, payment of the costs of all Public and Private Improvements, and construction of all Public and Private Improvements in accordance with the Plans, the Developer shall either deposit cash with the City or furnish the City with a letter of credit in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A (or some combination of cash and a letter of credit), from a bank in the total amount of $80,000 ("Security"). The bank issuing the letter of credit shall be subject to the approval of the City Manager and the bank shall be authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota. The City may 6 217893v1 draw down the security after an event of default of Developer under the terms of this Agreement and failure of Developer to cure the default after lapse of the grace period given Developer to cure a default under Section 18 of this Agreement, on five (5) business days written notice to the Developer, for any violation of the terms of this Agreement or without notice if the security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City that the Project has been substantially completed in accordance with the Plans and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with City approval the security may be reduced from time to time by ninety percent (90%) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10%) of the security shall be retained as security until all Public Improvements have been completed, all financial obligations to the City satisfied, the required "as constructed" plans have been received by the City, a warranty is provided, and the Public Improvements are accepted by the City Council. The City’s standard specifications for utility and street construction outline procedures for security reductions. 14. WARRANTY. The Developer warrants all Public and Private Improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this Agreement against poor material and faulty workmanship. The warranty period for all Public Improvements is one year and shall commence following completion and acceptance by City Engineer. The Developer shall post or cause its contractor to post maintenance bonds in the amount of twenty-five percent (25%) of final certified construction costs of the Public Improvements to secure the warranties. The City shall retain ten percent (10%) of the security posted by the Developer until the maintenance bonds are furnished to the City or until the warranty period expires, whichever first occurs. The retainage may be used to pay for warranty work. 7 217893v1 15. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. A. The Developer shall comply with the conditions outlined in City Council Resolution No. 2021-76. B. The Developer shall comply with the conditions outlined in the Director of Engineering’s memo dated May 27, 2021. C. The Developer shall comply and is subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment revising the PUD, Planned Unit Development for the Subject Property. D. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements pursuant to Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. E. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements pursuant City Code Section 36-1260 and receive City’s review and approval of such plan. F. Developer shall install code compliant bike racks near the building entrances. G. Developer’s installation of the roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened pursuant City Code Section 36-1459 and shall receive City’s review and approval of such plan. H. Developer shall obtain and submit to the City for approval a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit prior to issuance of a building permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District’s requirements. I. The Developer shall comply with the Wenck Consulting Traffic and Parking Study recommendations. J. The Developer shall provide a performance bond, letter of credit or cash deposit to the City for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of the first building permit. 8 217893v1 K. The Developer shall pay the buy-in amount for affording housing of $4.1 million dollars for the City of Edina to provide for affordable housing elsewhere in the City. L. The Developer shall submit a Construction Management Plan for review and approval by City staff prior to the issuance of a building permit. M. Developer shall dedicate a public access easement over the north-south sidewalk along the east side of the property and the east-west sidewalk along 77th Street. The Developer will widen the north-south sidewalk from 5 feet to 8 feet and maintenance of this sidewalk shall be the responsibility of the property owner. The City will maintain the sidewalk along 77th Street. The Developer will be responsible to make sure the boulevard between the street and the sidewalk will be 10 feet. The property owner will be responsible for the maintenance of all internal sidewalks to the Project. 16. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. The Developer shall pay all reasonable costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the installation of the Public Improvements, including but not limited to the development of the site, legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and development of the Subject Property, the preparation of this Agreement, review of any other plans and documents. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from Developer’s development of the site and installation of Public Improvements, except for costs incurred as a result of the City’s negligence or intentional misconduct. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including reasonable attorneys' 9 217893v1 fees, except for costs, damagers or expenses incurred as a result of the City’s negligence or intentional misconduct, occurring during Developer’s ownership of the Subject Property. C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for undisputed obligations incurred under this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the undisputed bills are not paid on time, the City may halt site development and construction until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per year. 17. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City or the Developer under this Agreement. B. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including property conveyed to third parties. C. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Agreement. D. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. E. This Agreement shall run with the land and will be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer has fee title to the Subject Property or has obtained consents to this Agreement, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no 10 217893v1 unrecorded interests in the property; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. F. The Developer and its contractors shall acquire public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of the Developer's work or the work of their subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for such insurance shall be in a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy on a primary and noncontributory basis, and the Developer and contractors shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage. The Developer and contractors must provide a Certificate of Insurance which meets the following requirements: 1. The Description section of the Accord form needs to read “City of Edina is named as Additional Insured with respect to the General Liability and Auto Liability policies on a Primary and Non-Contributory Basis.” 2. Certificate Holder must be City of Edina. 3. Provide a copy of the policy endorsement showing City of Edina named as Additional Insured on a Primary and Non-Contributory Basis. These insurance coverages and the requirements hereunder shall be required until the Certificate of Completion is issued. G. The Developer and its general contractor shall obtain Workmen’s Compensation Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota, including Employer’s Liability Insurance, to the limit of $100,000 each accident. These insurance coverages and the requirements hereunder shall be required until the Certificate of Completion is issued. H. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as 11 217893v1 often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. I. The Developer represents to the City that the Public Improvements comply with all city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the Public Improvements do not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work on the Subject Property until the Developer does comply. Upon the City’s demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. J. The Developer may not assign this Agreement without the written permission of the City Council prior to issuance of the Certificate of Completion. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire Subject Property, or any part of it. K. An uncured breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer and the failure to cure such breach within the period provided in this Agreement, including nonpayment of billings from the City, shall be grounds for denial of building permits and certificates of occupancy, and the halting of all work on the property. L. From time to time, when requested by Developer, the City shall execute and deliver a recordable certificate confirming the satisfaction or completion of certain requirements contained in this Agreement. 18. DEVELOPER’S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer, beyond the applicable notice and cure periods provided in this Agreement, as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any actual, out-of-pocket expense incurred by the City, provided 12 217893v1 the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given written notice of the work in default and the opportunity to cure, not less than thirty (30) days in advance. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 19. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: Pentagon One LLC Attn: ____________________ 724 North First Street, Suite 500 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: City of Edina Attn: City Manager Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424-1330 20. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION. After the Developer has received the final certificate of occupancy for the Improvements and completed the work required under this Agreement, the City Manager will issue a certificate of completion after written request from the Developer, unless denied as set forth below. The certificate of completion shall be consistent in form with the certificate of completion issued by the City and shall be in recordable form and may be recorded against the Subject Property. 13 217893v1 CITY: CITY OF EDINA By: ____________________________________ James Hovland, Mayor And ___________________________________ Scott Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of _______________, 2021, by James Hovland and Scott Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager, of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ___________________________________ Notary Public 14 217893v1 DEVELOPER: PENTAGON ONE LLC By: ______________________________________ ____________________________ [print name] Its ___________________________ [title] STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of _______________, 2021, by _______________________, the ______________ of Pentagon One LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. ___________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: 651-452-5000 DSK 217893v1 EXHIBIT A IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. ___________________ Date: _________________ TO: City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424-1330 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $____________, available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. __________, dated ________________, 2_____, of (Name of Bank) "; b) Be signed by the City Manager or Finance Director of the City of Edina. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) , on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2_____. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty- five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Edina Finance Director that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Edina City Manager, Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424-1330, and is actually received by the City Manager at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. BY: ____________________________________ Its ______________________________ 217893v1 MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT ASSOCIATED BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association, holds a Mortgage, Security Agreement, Fixture Financing Statement and Assignment of Leases and Rents on the Subject Property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Improvement Performance Agreement, which Mortgage is dated July 9, 2021 and recorded July 16, 2021 with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles as document number T5858018; and holds an Assignment of Leases and Rents on the Subject Property, which Assignment is dated July 9, 2021 and recorded July 16, 2021 with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles as document number T5858019; and agrees that the Site Improvement Performance Agreement shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its Mortgage and/or Assignment. Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2021. ASSOCIATED BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION By: ______________________________________ ____________________________[print name] Its ____________________________ [title] STATE OF ______________ ) )ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of __________, 2021, by ______________________________, the ______________________________ of Associated Bank, National Association, a national banking association, on behalf of the association. ________________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 DSK 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER: 2110505/19/2021 SCHEMATIC DESIGN SET07/26/2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET08/11/21 WATERSHED SUBMITTAL08/23/21 60% CD REVIEW SET. .. .04/30/2021 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK. .. .. .. .. .. .. .COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.08/23/21REVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONC0.0TITLE SHEET. .. .. .. .. .. .PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIALEDINA, MINNESOTASHEET INDEXSHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLEC0.0 TITLE SHEETSITE SURVEYV1.0UTILITY PLANC4.0ISSUED FOR: 60% CD REVIEW SETSWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONSSW1.0GRADING PLANC3.0C5.0C5.1CIVIL DETAILSSWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONSSW1.1SWPPP - DETAILSSW1.2C2.0 SITE PLANSWPPP - NARRATIVESW1.3CIVIL DETAILSC1.0 REMOVALS PLANC5.2 CIVIL DETAILSKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRSWPPP - ATTACHMENTSSW1.4SWPPP - ATTACHMENTSSW1.5DEVELOPER / PROPERTY OWNER:SOLHEM COMPANIES724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONTACT: CURT GUNSBURY612-598-9416ENGINEER:CIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35TH STREETSUITE 200ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416612-615-0060SURVEYOR:GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER:BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION11001 HAMPSHIRE AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55438CONTACT: GERARD HAHN952-995-2000ARCHITECT / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:BKV GROUP222 N 2ND STSUITE 101MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONTACT: MATHEW H. NUGENT612-339-3752SUNDE LAND SURVEYING9001 E BLOOMINGTON FWY, SUITE 118BLOOMINGTON, MN 55420-3435CONTACT: LEONARD CARLSONSITE LOCATION MAPNSITE LOCATIONALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN AREAPPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL"(651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS,48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THECONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIESTHAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NOCOST TO THE OWNER.C5.3 CIVIL DETAILS09/08/21ADD-01. .09/09/21REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMISSION NOPARKING12187754332435' BUILDING SETBACK35' BUILDING SETBACK35' BUILDING SETBACK20' BUILDING SETBACKCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONST.LIMITSACCESSIBLE PARKINGSPACE, INCL.SIGNAGE, STRIPINGAND RAMPSM.D. BIT.PVMT., TYPPVMT.STRIPINGTYP.CONCRETE DRIVEWAYAPRON PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.REMOVE AND REPLACEEXISTING PAVEMENT ANDBASE MATERIAL TO MATCHEXISTING PAVEMENT SECTIONFOR UTILITY CONSTRUCTIONCONCRETE SIDEWALKPER CITY STANDARDS,TYP.B612 C&G, TYP.M.D. BIT.PVMT., TYPB612 C&G,TYP.B612 C&G,TYP.B612 C&G,TYP.PVMT. STRIPINGTYP.CONCRETE SIDEWALKPER CITY STANDARDS,TYP.CONCRETE DRIVEWAYAPRON PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.REMOVE AND REPLACEEXISTING PAVEMENT ANDBASE MATERIAL TO MATCHEXISTING PAVEMENT SECTIONFOR UTILITY CONSTRUCTION3' CURBTAPERMATCHEX. C&GMATCHMATCHMATCHMATCHB612 C&G,TYP.B612C&G,TYP.L.D. BIT.PVMT., TYPPVMT.STRIPINGTYP.CONC. WALK, TYPCONC. WALK, TYPGRAVEL PATH, TYPPICKLE BALL COURT,SEE ARCH'L PLANSFOR DETAILSRETAINING WALLS, SEEGRADING PLAN FOR WALLELEVATIONS, SEE ARCH'LPLANS FOR DETAILSRETAINING WALLS, SEEGRADING PLAN FOR WALLELEVATIONS, SEE ARCH'LPLANS FOR DETAILSPLAZA DECK WITH RETAINING WALLS,SEE ARCH'L PLANS FOR DETAILSPLAZA DECK WITH RETAINING WALLS,SEE ARCH'L PLANS FOR DETAILSCONC. STAIRS,SEE ARCH'L PLANSFOR DETAILSCONC. STAIRS &HANDRAIL, SEEARCH'L PLANS FORDETAILSCONC. STAIRSCONC. WALK, TYPL.D. BIT.PVMT., TYPL.D. BIT.PVMT., TYPL.D. BIT.PVMT., TYPPLAZA DECK WITHRETAINING WALLS,SEE ARCH'L PLANSFOR DETAILSM.D. BIT.PVMT., TYPSEE LANDSCAPINGPLAN, BY OTHERSCONC. STAIRS,SEE ARCH'L PLANSFOR DETAILSASPHALT. WALK, TYPCONC. PAVEMENT3' CURBTAPER3' CURBTAPERRIBBONCURB3' CURBTAPERMATCHEX. C&GMATCHEX. C&GMATCHEX. C&GMATCHACCESSIBLE ROUTEARROW. DO NOT PAINT,FOR CODE REVIEW ONLY,TYP.SPA DECK WITHRETAINING WALLS, SEEARCH'L AND LANDSCAPEPLANS FOR DETAILSSTEPPINGSTONE-TYPEPATH. SEELANDSCAPE PLANFOR DETAILS.CONC. STAIRS,SEE ARCH'L PLANSFOR DETAILSBOARDWALK OVER POND, SEE LANDSCAPE PLANGRAVEL PATH, TYPCREEK-BED TYPE WATER FEATURE,INCL. PUMPS FOR RECIRCULATION, SEEGRADING. COORD. W/ LANDSCAPE FORPLANTINGS AND SURFACING DETAILSWET POND (SEE GRADING, UTILITY, ANDLANDSCAPE PLANS)BOTTOM ELEVATION=814.00OUTLET INVERT=818.00EOF ELEVATION=820.80100-YR HWL=820.504:1 SIDE SLOPES, 3:1 DEEP SUBMERGEDSLOPES10:1 SLOPED SAFETY BENCH BETW.ELEVATIONS 817.00 & 818.00INSTALL BOULDER WALLS WHERE SIDESLOPES EXCEED 3:1INSTALL AQUATIC AND EMERGENT PLANTSPER LANDSCAPE PLAN. STOCK WITHAPPROPRIATE FISH, AMPHIBIAN, ANDREPTILE SPECIES, COORD. W/ OWNERHSIPAERATION AND RE-CIRCULATION DETAILST.B.D.CONCRETE WALK15.0'ROAD AND WALKWAY EASEMENTPROPOSED WALKWAYEASEMENT BETW. PROPLINE AND 5' WEST OFWALKWAYPROPOSED LIGHTPOLE, TYP. COORD. W/LANDSCAPE.ELEV. 816.00ELEV.818.00 NWLELEV.821.00ELEV. 814.00GRAVEL/STEPPINGSTONE PATH, SEELANDSCAPEBRIDGE OVERPOND, SEELANDSCAPE PLANCULVERT TOALLOW CREEKBEDTO FLOW UNDERSIDEWALKELEV. 816.00PERMEABLEPAVEMENTAREAS, TYP. SEEDETAIL.INSTALL BOULDER WALLALONG POND AT ANY SLOPEGREATER THAN 3:1, SEELANDSCAPE PLANBEGIN BOARDWALK, SEELANDSCAPE PLANBEGIN BOARDWALK,SEE LANDSCAPE PLANGRAVEL/STEPPINGSTONE PATH, SEELANDSCAPE PLANRETAINING WALL,DETAILS, T.B.D.RETAINING WALL,SEE LANDSCAPE3' CURBTAPERDOG PARK, COORD. W/LANDSCAPE AND OWNER ONFENCING AND AMENITIES20.0'9.0'22.0'8.5'18.0'R3 6 . 0 ' R20 . 0 '32.3'22.0'R3.0'R8.0'R6.0'R100.0'R3.0'R78.0'R100.0'20.0' MIN. WETLAND BUFFERWETLANDBUFFERSIGNAGE,COORD. W/WATERSHEDDISTRICT FORDESIGNGRAVEL SURFACEON BOTH SIDES OFCONC. WALKWAY6' CURBTAPER4.0'4.0'8.0'CAST IN PLACE CONCRETESTEPS, TYP. SEE ARCHPLANS & DETAILS4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060THE FRED 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER: 2110505/19/2021 SCHEMATIC DESIGN SET07/26/2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET08/11/21 WATERSHED SUBMITTAL08/23/21 60% CD REVIEW SET09/08/21ADD-01. .04/30/2021 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK. .. .. .. .. .. .. .COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.08/23/21REVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONC2.0SITE PLAN. .. .. .. .. .. .SITE AREA TABLE:1.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNINGCONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES,EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINALLOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OFCONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TOOWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIORTO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING ARIGHT-OF-WAY AND STREET OPENING PERMIT.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TOINSTALLATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKE FORREVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS.5.LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS AREAPPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BYTHE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.6.CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETEFOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BYTHE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENTMATERIALS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS,BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNER RESERVES THERIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED.8.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCEWITH A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS-SEE DETAIL.9.CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TOTHE FLOW OF TRAFFIC. WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BEWHITE IN COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES.10.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND GUTTER TYPE. TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES-SEE DETAIL.11.ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.12.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TOSITE IMPROVEMENTS.13.FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS.14.PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.15.ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP.16.BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENTSECTIONS.17.ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THEDRIP LINE. SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS.18.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL"(651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THECONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NOCOST TO THE OWNER.SITE LAYOUT NOTES:SITE PLAN LEGEND:TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGSCITY OF EDINA SITE SPECIFIC NOTES:SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED.HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGNNP = NO PARKING FIRE LANEST = STOPCP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"N1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC NOTES.Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCONCRETE PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) ASSPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK) SEE GEOTECHNICALREPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & CONCRETEDEPTHS, SEE DETAIL.PROPERTY LINECURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUTGUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLANLIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE).SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE& WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DEATIL.MEDIUM DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE).SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE &WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DETAIL.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSTOSPECIALTY PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) - PROVIDE BIDFOR THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS, INCLUDE VARIATIONSOF BASE MATERIAL AND OTHER NECESSARYCOMPONENTS.1. STAMPED & COLORED CONCRETE2. CONCRETE PAVERSMAKERS, COLORS, MODELS, & PATTERN TO BEINCLUDED IN SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTAL PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.OPERATIONAL NOTES:SNOW REMOVAL:ALL SNOW SHALL BE STORED ON-SITE AT OUTSIDE EDGES OF PARKING LOT. WHEN THOSEAREAS ARE FULL, SNOW REMOVAL COMPANY WILL REMOVE TO OFFSITE LOCATIONTRASH REMOVAL:TRASH SHALL BE COLLECTED IN INTERIOR COLLECTION AREA AND STAGED OUTSIDE,WHERE DESIGNATED, ON DAY OF PICK-UP BY BUILDING PERSONNEL. PICK-UP SHALL BE BYCOMMERCIAL REFUSE AND RECYCLING HAULER COMPANY.DELIVERIES:DELIVERIES SHALL OCCUR AT THE MAIN ENTRANCE VIA STANDARD COMMERCIAL DELIVERYVEHICLES (UPS, FED EX, USPS). MOVE-IN/OUT OPERATIONS MAY BE STAGED AT OTHEREGRESS LOCATIONS WITH COORDINATION AND OPERATIONS ORGANIZED BY BUILDINGSTAFF, INCLUDING TRAFFIC CONTROL, AS REQUIRED.ACCESSIBILITY ARROW (IF APPLICABLE) DO NOTPAINT.PERVIOUS PAVEMENT - INCLUDE ALL BASE MATERIALAND APPURTENANCES AS SPECIFIED PERMANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS & INSTRUCTIONS.MAKE: T.B.D.MODEL: T.B.D.COLOR: T.B.D. - PROVIDE SAMPLES, SHOP DRAWINGS & PRODUCT DATA REQUIRED PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION.AAAAA09/08/21ADD-01. .09/09/21REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMISSION NOPARKING35' BUILDING SETBACK35' BUILDING SETBACK35' BUILDING SETBACK20' BUILDING SETBACKCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONST.LIMITS15.0'ROAD AND WALKWAY EASEMENT4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060THE FRED 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER: 2110505/19/2021 SCHEMATIC DESIGN SET07/26/2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET08/11/21 WATERSHED SUBMITTAL08/23/21 60% CD REVIEW SET09/08/21ADD-01. .04/30/2021 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK. .. .. .. .. .. .. .COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.08/23/21REVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONC3.0GRADING PLAN. .. .. .. .. .. .1.SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT & GENERAL GRADING NOTES.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SITEPREPARATION, SOIL CORRECTION, EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, ETC.) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTSOF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONSWITH THE SOILS ENGINEER.3.GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTIONDISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS & PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY.ALLEXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLREPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.4.PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW-LINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.5.GRADES OF WALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 5% MAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1% MIN. AND 2% MAX. CROSSSLOPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.6.PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. MAXIMUMSLOPES IN MAINTAINED AREAS IS 4:17.PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, FREESTANDING WALLS, OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES GREATER THAN 4' INHEIGHT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING WALL ENGINEER. DESIGNDRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATIONOF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AFINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOTOPSOIL AND SODDING ACTIVITIES.9.IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALL EXCESS SOILMATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO AN AREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THESITE.10.EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREASDESIGNATED ON THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR RESPREADING ON THESITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN EMBANKMENT AREAS, OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS,ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUT CUT AREAS, WHERE TURF IS TO BEESTABLISHED, TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TOA MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES.11.FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITSOF GRADING, INCLUDING ADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHINSPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARESHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADED SHALL BEPROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALL AREAS THATHAVE BECOME RUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALLAREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO EQUAL OR BETTER THANORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORK.12.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND/ORPARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSSWEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BECOMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICHSECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BECOMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. NO TEST ROLL SHALL OCCURWITHIN 10' OF ANY UNDERGROUND STORM RETENTION/DETENTION SYSTEMS.13. TOLERANCES13.1.THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.30 FOOTABOVE, OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE.13.2.THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHEREMEASUREMENT IS MADE.13.3.AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW THEREQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER.13.4.TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS.14.MAINTENANCE14.1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND EROSION, AND KEEP AREAFREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS.14.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED, ERODED AND RUTTED AREAS TOSPECIFIED TOLERANCES. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED, AND DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD,ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED SHALL BE RESEEDED AND MULCHED.14.3.WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONSOR ADVERSE WEATHER, CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE, AND COMPACT TO REQUIREDDENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION.GENERAL GRADING NOTES:1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALGRADING PLAN LEGEND:SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTERSPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURBSPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRSGROUNDWATER INFORMATION:CITY OF EDINA GRADING NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC GRADING NOTES.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5EROSION CONTROL NOTES:01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallREX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINEUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)CURB AND GUTTER (T.O = TIP OUT)EMERGENCY OVERFLOWEOF=1135.52TOPER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY XXXXX, INC., DATED XX-XX-XX GROUNDWATER WASOBSERVED AT ELEVATIONS RANGING FROM XXX.XX TO XXX.XXTHE BORINGS & GROUNDWATER ARE AS FOLLOWS:SB-1XXX.XXSB-2XXX.XXSB-3XXX.XXSB-4XXX.XXPROPOSED FOOTING DRAIN TILE INVERT ELEVATION = XXX.XXSPOT GRADE ELEVATION MATCH EXISTINGGRADE BREAK - HIGH POINTSAAAA09/08/21ADD-01. .09/09/21REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMISSION NOPARKING35' BUILDING SETBACK35' BUILDING SETBACK35' BUILDING SETBACK20' BUILDING SETBACKCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONST.LIMITS15.0'ROAD AND WALKWAY EASEMENTSTUB 8" SANITARY TO5' FROM BUILDINGIE @ STUB=813.15COORD. W/ MECH'L,INSTALL BACKFLOWPREVENTION INSIDEOF BUILDING82 LF 8" PVC SDR 26SANITARY SERVICE@ 2.00%MAKE CONNECTION TO EXISTING12" TRUSS SANITARY SEWEREX IE (E/W)=811.51(FIELD VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION)PROP IE (N)=811.51COORD. W/ CITYSTUB 8" DIP FIRE SUPPRESSION& 6" DOMESTIC WATERSERVICES TO WITHIN 5' FROMBUILDING, COORD. W/ MECH'LPROPOSED GATEVALVE & VALVE BOXMAKE WET TAP CONNECTION TOEXISTING 8" CIP WATER MAIN,(FIELD VERIFY LOCATION PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION)COORD. W/ CITYEXISTINGHYDRANTHYD &GV, TYP.HYD &GV, TYP.MAKE WET TAP CONNECTION TOEXISTING 8" CIP WATER MAIN,(FIELD VERIFY LOCATION PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION)COORD. W/ CITY8" DIPCOMBINEDDOMESTIC ANDFIRESUPRRESSIONWATERSERVICE.10" DIP WATERMAIN8" DIPWATERMAIN10"X6"TEE45° BEND8"X6" TEEMAKE CONNECTIONTO EX. 8" DIP(FIELD VERIFY SIZEAND LOCATION)45° BENDPROPOSED GATEVALVE & VALVE BOX10"X8"TEE10" TO 8"REDUCER10"PLUGPROP. FDC LOCATIONRAINWATER REUSE/IRRIGATION CISTERN(2) 65 LF ROWS OF 60" DUAL WALL PP PIPEW/ STONE SEPARATION, TOP, ENDS & SIDESPER MANUFACTURER'S SHOP DRAWINGMIN. STORAGE VOLUME (BELOWOVERFLOW) REQUIRED=2,500 CFCISTERN IE=812.9015" OVERFLOW IE=817.90RETENTION PONDING, SEE GRADING PLAN& STORMWATER REPORTKEEP OFF-LINE UNTIL VEGETATION ISSTABLEEOF=820.80OUTLET=818.00BOTTOM=814.00PERMANENT POOL=814.00-818.00LIVE STORAGE=818.00-820.80100-YR HWL=820.5012" FES 8IE=818.00INSTALL RIP RAPPER MNDOT SPEC166 LF 12" HDPE @ 0.00%12" FES 8IE=818.00INSTALL RIP RAP PER MNDOT SPEC33 LF 12" HDPE @ 0.00%OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE 10RE=822.00IE(S)=818.30IE(N)=818.00CONSTRUCT WEIR WALL IN MHTOP OF WEIR WALL=820.00STMH 9RE=822.00IE=818.006 LF 12" HDPE @ 0.00%IE=818.30UNDERGROUND POND 2PFOOTPRINT=202' X 17'1 ROW OF 202 LF 29"T X 42" WPERFORATED CMP ARCH PIPE6" STONE BASE AND TOP12" STONE ENDS6'-9" STONE SIDESSTONE BASE IE=817.80CMP IE=818.30CMP TOP=820.72STONE TOP=821.22SEE DETAIL100-YR HWL=820.46NWL=820.00UNDERGROUND POND 1PTWO CONNECTING SECTIONS OF 48" PERF. CMPSECTION A FOOTPRINT=80' X 30'SECTION B FOOTPRINT=60' X 30'INCLUDING 12" STONE SIDES AND ENDS6" STONE BASE AND TOPSTONE BASE IE=816.00CMP IE=816.50CMP TOP=820.50STONE TOP=821.00100-YR HWL=822.00 (EOF TO 77TH)NWL=818.00SEE DETAILOUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE 2RE=822.10IE(E/W)=816.50CONSTRUCT WEIR WALL IN MHTOP OF WEIR WALL=818.506" ORIFICE IN WEIR WALL,IE=818.00STMH 1RE=821.40±IE=815.8183 LF 15" HDPE @ 0.69%EX. MHRIM=820.30EX IE (S)=815.30(FIELD VERIFY)PR IE (NE)=815.50CORE DRILL NEWCONNECTION TOEXISTING MHCOORD. RELOCATIONOF EXISTINGELECTRIC MH WITHUTILITY OWNER33 LF 15" HDPE @ 0.89%CBMH 3RE=821.76IE=817.4412" INLETIE=816.5091 LF 12" HDPE @ 1.00%82 LF 12" HDPE @ 1.00%CB 4RE=821.98±IE=818.26STUB 10" STORM TO 5' FROM BUILDING,COORD. W/ MECH'LSTUB IE=819.147 LF 12" PVC SCH. 40@ 2.00%10" BUILDING STORMDRAIN INLETIE=819.00, TYP.CBMH 5RE=822.88IE=816.73STMH 6RE=825.00IE=817.1087 LF 15" HDPE @ 0.43%182 LF 15" HDPE @ 0.43%CISTERN OVERFLOW OUTLETIE=817.90±CISTERN PUMP HOUSE FOR IRRIGATION &REUSERAINWATER FILTER MH 7STUB 12" STORM SEWER TO 5' FROM BLDG,COORD. W/ MECH'LSTUB IE=816.50INLET IE=816.308"x8"x6" TEEFINAL WATER AND SANITARY SERVICESIZES, LOCATIONS, AND INVERTS TO BECOORDINATED WITH MECHANICALENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.NOTIFY CIVIL ENGINEER OF CHANGES.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALLSMALL UTILITIES. NOTIFY CIVIL ENGINEEROF ANY CONFLICTSSTUB 10" STORM TO 5' FROM BUILDING,COORD. W/ MECH'LSTUB IE=819.147 LF 12" PVC SCH.40 @ 2.00%EQUALIZER PIPE85 LF 48" HDPE @ 0.00%IE=816.5054 LF 15" HDPE @ 0.43%15" INLETIE=816.504931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060THE FRED 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:2110505/19/2021 SCHEMATIC DESIGN SET07/26/2021DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET08/11/21 WATERSHED SUBMITTAL08/23/21 60% CD REVIEW SET09/08/21ADD-01. .04/30/2021 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK. .. .. .. .. .. .. .COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.08/23/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC4.0UTILITY PLAN. .. .. .. .. .. .GENERAL UTILITY NOTES:UTILITY LEGEND:CITY OF EDINA UTILITY NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC UTILITY NOTES.01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCATCH BASINGATE VALVE AND VALVE BOXSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATER MAINPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTMANHOLEFES AND RIP RAP1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIESAND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLIMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THEPLANS.3. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHERSTATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURSPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANYUTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.4. UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARDSPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION" AND "SANITARYSEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERSASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), AND SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTSOF THE CITY AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.5. CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE-USED ORPLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER.6. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) AWWA C151, ASME B16.4,AWWA C110, AWWA C153 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) ASTM D3034 & F679,OR SCH 40 ASTM D1785, 2665, ASTM F794, 1866) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.8. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE ASTM F714 & F2306 WITH ASTM D3212 SPECFITTINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.9. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OFFLARED END SECTION.10. UTILITIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THECONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDINGLINES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS.11. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALLCATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIMELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS.12. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.13. HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITYREQUIREMENTS. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL.14. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18"VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTHWATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL.15. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTALSEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.16. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITYSTANDARDS AND COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.17.CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE CORE-DRILLED.18. COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICALDRAWINGS.19. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIESWITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF.20. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTSOF THE CITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFICCONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHEDPER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROLDEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TOSIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETSSHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTEDWITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY.21. ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADESWHERE REQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH.STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTSFOR TRAFFIC LOADING.22. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES.23. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES.COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOTIMPACT INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES.24. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION ANDSUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK.25.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT ORWATERTIGHT. APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKEWATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES.26.ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THEBUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN RULES,CHAPTER 4714, SECTION 1109.0.27.FOR ALL SITES LOCATED IN CLAY SOIL AREAS, DRAIN TILE MUST BE INSTALLED AT ALLLOW POINT CATCH BASINS 25' IN EACH DIRECTION. SEE PLAN AND DETAIL. INSTALL LOWPOINT DRAIN TILE PER PLANS AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS ANDREQUIREMENTS.A09/08/21ADD-01. .09/09/21REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMISSION 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER: 2110505/19/2021 SCHEMATIC DESIGN SET07/26/2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET08/11/21 WATERSHED SUBMITTAL08/23/21 60% CD REVIEW SET. .. .04/30/2021 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK. .. .. .. .. .. .. .COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.08/23/21REVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONC5.2CIVIL DETAILS. .. .. .. .. .. .PERMEABLE PAVEMENT - #1 (1P)N T SNOTES:1. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.2. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS.3. A SUBGRADE CONSISTING OF GRADED AGGREGATES MAY BE REQUIRED WHEN SUBGRADE CONDITIONS ARE POOR.1.5"6"3/4" - 2"ANGULARWASHEDSTONERETENTION PIPINGASTM NO. 8 STONESETTING BED ANDIN-FILLPERMEABLE PAVEMENT- COORD. WITH OWNER,SEE MANUFACTURERSPECIFICATIONS18" 29"6"818.00 GWB612 CURB& GUTTERLIGHT DUTYPAVEMENTCOMPACTED SUBGRADE821.771OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTUREN T SWEIR PLATEGEOTEXTILE, TYPICAL TOWRAP AROUND FILTERMATERIALNATIVE MATERIALCOMPACTED PERGEOTECHNICAL REPORT,TYPICAL48"Ø CMP0.75"-2" STONEELEV=MH RIMSEE UTILITY PLANOUTLETELEV=SEE PLANELEV=SEE PLAN (TOP WEIRWALL)SUBGRADE SOILS(IN-SITU SAND)2148" 6" MIN.6" MIN.KEY1. TOPSOIL2. FREE DRAINING ANGULAR WASHED STONE 3/4" - 2" PARTICLE SIZE (NON LIMESTONE MATERIAL THAT CONTAINS LESS THAN 5% DELETERIOUS MATERIALS). INSTALL TO MIN. 95% STANDARD DENSITY PER AASHTO T99.FABRIC WRAP TOP ANDSIDES WITHCONTECH C-40NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILESECTION DETAILNTS1.INSTALL SILT FENCE AND/OR OR OTHER APPROPRIATE TEMPORARY EROSIONCONTROL DEVICES TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING OR ENTERING THEPRACTICE DURING CONSTRUCTION.2.ALL DOWN-GRADIENT PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S MUST BE INPLACE BEFORE ANY UP GRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY BEGINS.3.PERFORM CONTINUOUS INSPECTIONS OF EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES.4.INSTALL UTILITIES (WATER, SANITARY SEWER, ELECTRIC, PHONE, FIBER OPTIC,ETC) PRIOR TO SETTING FINAL GRADE OF BIORETENTION DEVICE.5.PERFORM ALL OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENTS.6.SEED AND MULCH ALL AREAS AFTER DISTURBANCE.7.CONSTRUCT RETENTION DEVICE UPON STABILIZATION OF CONTRIBUTINGDRAINAGE AREA.8.IMPLEMENT TEMPORARY AND PERMENATE EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES.9.PLANT AND MULCH SITE.10.REMOVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AFTER THE CONTRIBUTINGDRAINAGE AREA IS ADEQUATELY VEGETATED.GENERAL NOTES1.IN THE EVENT THAT SEDIMENT IS INTRODUCED INTO THE BMP DURING ORIMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EXCAVATION, THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVEDFROM THE PRACTICE PRIOR TO CONTINUING CONSTRUCTION.2.GRADING OF RETENTION DEVICES SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED USINGLOW-COMPACTION EARTH-MOVING EQUIPMENT TO PREVENT COMPACTION OFUNDERLYING SOILS.3.ALL SUB MATERIALS BELOW THE SPECIFIED RETENTION DEPTH (ELEVATION)SHALL BE UNDISTURBED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCINGGRADEPAVEMENT/LANDSCAPING / SOD12"(TYP)24"PERFORATEDCMP PIPEUNDERGROUND RETENTION SYSTEM (4P)N T S12"(TYP3209/08/21ADD-01. .09/09/21REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMISSION CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONST.LIMITSINLET PROTECTION ATCATCH BASINS BEINGREMOVEDCONSTRUCTIONENTRANCECONSTRUCTIONENTRANCEPLACE EROSIONCONTROL BLANKETON ALL SLOPES 4:1 ORSTEEPER, TYP.(MNDOT CATEGORY 3)CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEINLET PROTECTION AT ALLDOWNSTREAM CATCH BASINS.PLACE EROSION CONTROLBLANKET ON ALL SLOPES4:1 OR STEEPER, TYP.(MNDOT CATEGORY 3)4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER: 2110505/19/2021 SCHEMATIC DESIGN SET07/26/2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET08/11/21 WATERSHED SUBMITTAL08/23/21 60% CD REVIEW SET. .. .04/30/2021 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK. .. .. .. .. .. .. .COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.08/23/21REVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONSW1.0SWPPP - EXISTINGCONDITIONS. .. .. .. .. .. .01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"N1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES.CITY OF EDINA EROSION CONTROL NOTES:1. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL REQUIRE ANMPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAININGANY EROSION CONTROL PERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.2. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES,DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES.3. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSIONCONTROL NOTES.4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION,INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT.SWPPP NOTES:Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRLEGEND:EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALINLET PROTECTIONSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEDRAINAGE ARROW1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMITEROSION CONTROL BLANKETALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, ANDMEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUMREQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURINGTHE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION.09/08/21ADD-01. .09/09/21REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMISSION NOPARKING35' BUILDING SETBACK35' BUILDING SETBACK35' BUILDING SETBACK20' BUILDING SETBACKCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONST.LIMITS15.0'ROAD AND WALKWAY EASEMENTCONSTRUCTIONENTRANCECONSTRUCTIONENTRANCEINLET PROTECTION ATCATCH BASINS, TYPPLACE EROSIONCONTROL BLANKETON ALL SLOPES 4:1 ORSTEEPER, TYP.(MNDOT CATEGORY 3)CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEINLET PROTECTION AT ALLDOWNSTREAM CATCH BASINS.PLACE EROSION CONTROLBLANKET ON ALL SLOPES4:1 OR STEEPER, TYP.(MNDOT CATEGORY 3)4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER: 2110505/19/2021 SCHEMATIC DESIGN SET07/26/2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET08/11/21 WATERSHED SUBMITTAL08/23/21 60% CD REVIEW SET. .. .04/30/2021 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK. .. .. .. .. .. .. .COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.08/23/21REVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONSW1.1SWPPP - PROPOSEDCONDITIONS. .. .. .. .. .. .01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRLEGEND:EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALINLET PROTECTIONSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEDRAINAGE ARROW1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMITEROSION CONTROL BLANKET1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES.CITY OF EDINA EROSION CONTROL NOTES:1. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL REQUIRE ANMPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAININGANY EROSION CONTROL PERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.2. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES,DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES.3. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSIONCONTROL NOTES.4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION,INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT.SWPPP NOTES:ALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, ANDMEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUMREQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURINGTHE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION.09/08/21ADD-01. .09/09/21REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMISSION 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER: 2110505/19/2021 SCHEMATIC DESIGN SET07/26/2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET08/11/21 WATERSHED SUBMITTAL08/23/21 60% CD REVIEW SET. .. .04/30/2021 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK. .. .. .. .. .. .. .COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.08/23/21REVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONSW1.2SWPPP - DETAILS. .. .. .. .. .. .OVERFLOW AT TOP OFFILTER ASSEMBLYOVERFLOW IS 12 OF THE CURBBOX HEIGHTHIGH-FLOW FABRICFILTER ASSEMBLY DIAMETER, 6"ON-GRADE 10" AT LOW POINTEXISTING CURB, PLATE, BOX,AND GRATENOTES:1. REPLACE INLET GRATE UPON COMPLETE INSTALLATION OF INLET PROTECTION FABRIC.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS FROM THE SURFACE OF THE SYSTEMAFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND AT THE COMPLETION OF THE CONTRACT.3. REFERENCE APPLE VALLEY STANDARD PLATE ERO-4C.CURB INLET FILTERN T S1PROFILE6" MIN CRUSHED STONE75' MINIMUMPLANFINISHEDGRADETO CONSTRUCTION AREA35' REXISTINGUNDISTURBEDROADWAYN T S30' FROM EDGE OF ROADTO FRONT OF SPEED BUMPGEOTEXTILE FILTERFABRIC4" HIGH, 18" WIDESPEED BUMPSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ACCESS24' (MIN)NOTES:1.PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND UNDISTURBEDROADWAY.2.THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENTONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE OR ADDINGSTONE TO THE LENGTH OF THE ENTRANCE.3.REPAIR AND CLEANOUT MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT.4.ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY SHALL BE REMOVED ASDIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.5.FINAL LOCATION AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.6.CRUSHED STONE SHALL BE 1-1/2" DIA. CLOSE GRADED, AND IN ACCORDANCE TO MNDOT SECTION 2118.EXISTING UNDISTURBED ROADWAY35' RTO CONSTRUCTIONAREA2TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL.SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES,10" SPACING, 4" DOWN FROMTRENCHOVERLAP: BURY UPPER ENDOF LOWER STRIP AS IN 'A'AND 'B'. OVERLAP END OFTOP STRIP 4" AND STAPLE.EROSION STOP: FOLD OF MATTINGBURIED IN SILT TRENCH ANDTAMPED. DOUBLEROW OFSTAPLES.PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APARTTO KEEP MATTING FIRMLYPRESSED TO SOIL.'D''C''B'BURY THE TOP END OF THEMATTING IN A TRENCH 4" ORMORE IN DEPTHTYPICAL STAPLE #8GAUGE WIRE1 1/2"10"OVERFALL'E''A'NOTE:1. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TOKEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TOSOIL.EROSION BLANKETN T S3FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIEDEXISTING GROUNDSURFACEDIRECTION OF FLOWWOODEN STAKES 1/2"X2"X16" MIN. PLACED 10' O.C.WHEN INSTALLED ON GROUND. IF INSTALLED ONPVMT. PROVIDE SANDBAGS BEHIND AND ON TOP ATMIN. 10' O.C.8" MIN.SEDIMENT BIO-ROLL / COMPOST FILTER LOGN T SFILLER AS SPECIFIEDNOTE:1. COMPOST FILTER LOGS (BIO ROLLS) SHALL BE FILTREXX EROSION CONTROL SOXX OR APPROVED EQUAL.2. COMPOST FILLER TO BE MADE FROM A COMPOST BLEND 30%-40% GRADE 2 (SPEC 3890) AND 60%-70%PARTIALLY DECOMPOSED WOOD CHIPS, PER MNDOT SPEC 3897.3. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE GEOTEXTILE KNITTED MATERIAL WITH MAX. OPENINGS OF 3/8".4. IF MULTIPLE ROLLS NEEDED, OVERLAP BY MIN. 12" AT ENDS AND STAKE.5. SILT SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE IT REACHES 80% OF THE HEIGHT OF THE ROLL OR AS DEEMED NECESSARYBY SITE CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN PROPER FUNCTION.FILL UPSTREAM BASE EDGE WITH2" OF DIRT OR COMPOST TOEMBED ROLL.4FILTER FABRIC WITH WIRE SUPPORT NETAS SPECIFIED.METAL POST ASSPECIFIED.FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED SECURETO WIRE SUPPORT NET WITH METALCLIPS 12"O.C.SUPPORT NET: 12 GAUGE 4" x 4"WIRE HOOKED ONTOPREFORMED CHANNELS ONPOSTS AS SPECIFIED.EXISTING GROUNDSURFACECARRY WIRE SUPPORT NETDOWN INTO TRENCHDIRECTION OF FLOWANCHOR FABRIC WITHSOIL, TAMP BACKFILLMETAL POSTS 8'-0" O.C.MAX.24" 24" 24"MIN. 6"6"SEDIMENT FENCEN T S509/08/21ADD-01. .09/09/21REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMISSION 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER: 2110505/19/2021 SCHEMATIC DESIGN SET07/26/2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET08/11/21 WATERSHED SUBMITTAL08/23/21 60% CD REVIEW SET. .. .04/30/2021 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK. .. .. .. .. .. .. .COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.08/23/21REVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONSW1.5SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS. .. .. .. .. .. .ATTACHMENT B: SWPPP INSPECTION FORMATTACHMENT C: MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMNOTE: THIS INSPECTION REPORT DOES NOT ADDRESS ALL ASPECTS OF THE NATIONAL APOLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM/STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (NPDES/SDS) CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT ISSUED ON AUGUST 1,2013. THE COMPLETION OF THIS CHECKLIST DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ALL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS ARE IN COMPLIANCE; IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE(S) TO READ AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.FACILITY INFORMATIONSITE NAME: FACILITY ADDRESS: PERMIT NUMBER:CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE:INSPECTION INFORMATIONINSPECTOR NAME: _______________________ PHONE NUMBER: _________________________DATE (MM/DD/YYYY): _____________________ TIME: ____________ AM / PMIS THE INSPECTOR CERTIFIED IN SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL AND IS IT DOCUMENTED IN THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP)?IS THIS INSPECTION ROUTINE OR IN RESPONSE TO A STORM EVENT:RAINFALL AMOUNT (IF APPLICABLE): ____________IS THE SITE WITHIN ONE AERIAL MILE OF A SPECIAL OR IMPARED WATER?IF YES, FOLLOW APPENDIX A AND OTHER APPLICABLE PERMIT REQUIREMENTSNOTE: IF N/A IS SELECTED AT ANY TIME, SPECIFY WHY IN THE COMMENT AREA FOR THAT SECTION.EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENT (PART IV.B)1. SOIL STABILIZATION WHERE NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FOR 14 DAYS? (7 DAYS WHERE APPLICABLE)2. HAS THE NEED TO DISTURB STEEP SLOPES BEEN MINIMIZED?3. ALL DITCHES STABILIZED 200; BACK FROM POINT OF DISCHARGE WITHIN 24 HOURS? (NOT MULCH)4. ARE THERE BMP'S FOR ONSITE STOCKPILES?5. ARE APPROPRIATE BMP'S INSTALLED PROTECTING INLETS/OUTLETS?6. DO PIPE OUTLETS HAVE ENERGY DISSIPATION?COMMENTS:SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENT (PART IV.C)1. PERIMETER CONTROL INSTALLED ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS?2. PERIMETER CONTROL TRENCHED IN WHERE APPROPRIATE?3. 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER MAINTAINED AROUND ALL SURFACE WATERS?3.1. IF NO, HAVE REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS BEEN INSTALLED?4. INLET PROTECTION ON ALL CATCH BASINS AND CULVERT INLETS?5. VEHICLE TRACKING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AT ALL SITE EXITS?6. ALL TRACKED SEDIMENT REMOVED WITHIN 24 HOURS?7. ARE ALL INFILTRATION SYSTEMS STAKED AND MARKED TO AVOID COMPACTION?8. ARE ALL INFILTRATION AREAS PROTECTED WITH A PRETREATMENT DEVICE?9. DO ALL STOCKPILES HAVE PERIMETER CONTROLS?COMMENTS:MAINTENANCE-EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S (PART IV.E.)1. ARE ALL PREVIOUSLY STABILIZED AREAS MAINTAINING 90% GROUND COVER?2. ANY DITCH EROSION OBSERVED?3. PERIMETER CONTROL--HAS SEDIMENT REACHED ONE HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE?4. ARE INLET PROTECTION DEVICES MAINTAINED AND FUNCTIONING PROPERLY?COMMENTS:OTHER1. ARE ALL MATERIALS THAT CAN LEACH POLLUTANTS UNDER COVER?2. HAS ACCESS BEEN RESTRICTED TO ONSITE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS?3. DOES ON-SITE FUELING ONLY OCCUR IN A CONTAINED AREA?4. ARE ALL SOLID WASTES BEING PROPERLY DISPOSED OF?5. IS THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA COMPLETELY CONTAINED?6. IS THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA MARKED WITH SIGN?COMMENTS:7. WERE ANY DISCHARGES SEEN DURING THIS INSPECTION, SEDIMENT, WATER, OR OTHERWISE?7.1. IF YES, STATE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL POINTS OF DISCHARGE. PHOTOGRAPH THE DISCHARGE AND DESCRIBE THE DISCHARGE (COLOR, ODOR, FOAM, OIL SHEEN, ETC). HOW WILL IT BE REMOVED? HOW DID THE DISCHARGEHAPPEN? HOW MUCH WAS DISCHARGED? HOW WILL IT BE STOPPED, AND HOW LONG WILL IT TAKE TO STOP? IS THE DISCHARGE GOING INTO AN ADJACENT SITE? WAS THE DISCHARGE A SEDIMENT DELTA? IF YES, WILL THE DELTA BERECOVERED WITHIN 7 DAYS?8. WILL A PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM BE UTILIZED IN THIS PROJECT AS REQUIRED AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART III.D OF THE PERMIT? DESCRIBE:9. IS ANY DEWATERING OCCURRING ON SITE?9.1. IF YES, WHERE? WHAT BMP IS BEING USED? HOW MUCH WATER IS BEING DEWATERED? IS THE WATER CLEAR? WHERE IS THE WATER BEING DISCHARGED TO?10. IS A COPY OF THE SWPPP LOCATED ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE?11. HAS THE SWPPP BEEN FOLLOWED AND IMPLEMENTED ON SITE?12. IS A SEDIMENTATION BASIN REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT AS SPECIFIED IN THE PERMIT?12.1. IF YES, ARE THEY MAINTAINED AS SPECIFIED IN THE PERMIT?13. IS THE TOPSOIL ON THIS PROJECT BEING PRESERVED?13.1. IF YES, EXPLAIN HOW THE TOP SOIL IS BEING PRESERVED. IF NO, EXPLAIN WHY IT WAS INFEASIBLE.14. ARE ALL INFILTRATION SYSTEMS MARKED TO AVOID COMPACTION?14.1. DO ALL INFILTRATION AREAS HAVE PRETREATMENT DEVICES?15. DESCRIPTION OF AREAS OF NON-COMPLIANCE NOTED DURING THE INSPECTION, REQUIRED CORRECTIVE ACTIONS, AND RECOMMENDED DATE OF COMPLETION OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS:16. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP:17. POTENTIAL AREAS OF FUTURE CONCERN:18. ADDITIONAL COMMENTSDISCLOSURES:·AFTER DISCOVERY, THE PERMIT REQUIRES MANY OF THE DEFICIENCIES THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THIS CHECKLIST BE CORRECTED WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD OF TIME. SEE PERMIT FOR MORE DETAILS.·THIS INSPECTION CHECKLIST IS AN OPTION FOR SMALL CONSTRUCTION SITES. LARGE CONSTRUCTION SITES AND LINEAR PROJECTS REQUIRE MORE EXTENSIVE/MORE LOCATION SPECIFIC INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS.·THE PERMITTEE(S) IS/ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT BMP'S AS WELL AS EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S UNTILANOTHER PERMITTEE HAS OBTAINED COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT ACCORDING TO PART II.B.5., OR THE PROJECT HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION AND A NOTICE OF TERMINATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA.Y N N/AY N N/AY N N/AY N N/AY N N/AY N N/AY N N/AY N N/AATTACHMENT C - CHAMBERFACILITY MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE1. ALL GRIT CHAMBERS, SUMP CATCH BASINS, SUMP MANHOLES, OUTLET STRUCTURES, CULVERTS, OUTFALL STRUCTURES AND OTHERSTORM WATER FACILITIES FOR WHICH MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED HEREIN MUST BE INSPECTED IN THESPRING, SUMMER AND FALL OF EACH YEAR. WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE INSPECTION DATE, ALL ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS MUST BEREMOVED SUCH THAT EACH STORM WATER FACILITY OPERATES AS DESIGNED AND PERMITTED. CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREAS MUST BEKEPT CLEAR OF LITTER AND VEGETATIVE DEBRIS, INFLOW PIPES AND OVERFLOW SPILLWAYS KEPT CLEAR, INLET AREAS KEPT CLEAN, ANDUNDESIRABLE VEGETATION REMOVED. EROSION IMPAIRING THE FUNCTION OR INTEGRITY OF THE FACILITIES, IF ANY, WILL BE CORRECTED,AND ANY STRUCTURAL DAMAGE IMPAIRING OR THREATENING TO IMPAIR THE FUNCTION OF THE FACILITIES MUST BE REPAIRED.2. VOLUME CONTROL FACILITIES AND CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREAS MUST BE INSPECTED EVERY THREE MONTHS DURING THEOPERATIONAL PERIOD (BETWEEN SPRING SNOWMELT AND FIRST SUBSTANTIAL SNOWFALL) AND MONITORED AFTER RAINFALL EVENTS OF 1INCH OR MORE TO ENSURE THAT THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IS CLEAR OF LITTER AND DEBRIS, INFLOW PIPES AND OVERFLOWSPILLWAYS ARE CLEAR, INLET AREAS ARE CLEAN, UNDESIRABLE VEGETATION IS REMOVED AND THERE IS NO EROSION IMPAIRING ORTHREATENING TO IMPAIR THE FUNCTION OF A FACILITY. IF SEDIMENT HAS ACCUMULATED IN A INFILTRATION FEATURE, WITHIN 30 DAYS OFINSPECTION DEPOSITED SEDIMENTS MUST BE REMOVED, THE INFILTRATION CAPACITY OF THE UNDERLYING SOILS MUST BE RESTORED,AND ANY SURFACE DISTURBANCE MUST BE STABILIZED. INSPECTION MUST ENSURE THAT SEDIMENT TRAPS AND FOREBAYS ARE TRAPPINGSEDIMENT AND THAT MORE THAN 50 PERCENT OF THE STORAGE VOLUME REMAINS, THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IS STABLE (I.E., NOEROSION IS OBSERVED), AND INLETS AND OUTLET/OVERFLOW SPILLWAYS ARE IN GOOD CONDITIONS WITH NO EROSION. MAINTENANCETECHNIQUES USED MUST PROTECT THE INFILTRATION CAPACITY OF THE PRACTICE BY LIMITING SOIL COMPACTION TO THE GREATESTEXTENT POSSIBLE (E.G., BY USING LOW-IMPACT EARTH-MOVING EQUIPMENT).3.UNDERGROUND STORAGE CHAMBERS MUST BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE A YEAR TO ENSURE THAT ADEQUATE STORAGE CAPACITY REMAINS.CAPACITY WILL BE CONSIDERED INADEQUATE IF SEDIMENT HAS DECREASED THE STORAGE VOLUME BY 50 PERCENT OF ITS ORIGINAL DESIGNVOLUME. ACCUMULATED DEBRIS AND SEDIMENT WILL BE REMOVED, AND INLET AND OUTLET STRUCTURES WILL BE CLEARED OF ANY FLOWIMPEDIMENTS.09/08/21ADD-01. .09/09/21REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMISSION 15.0'ROAD AND WALKWAY EASEMENT64.0'34.0'SHEET INDEX: TRUE NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering B K V R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2395-03 Pentagon Park/2395-03 Pentagon Park_LAND_2021.rvt8/23/2021 4:09:14 PMAuthor Checker 2395-03 L001 LANDSCAPE TITLE SHEET PENTAGON PARK HOUSING DEVELOPMENT SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME ISSUE 01ISSUE 02ISSUE 03ISSUE 04ISSUE 05ISSUE 063 - STANDARD SHEETS L001 LANDSCAPE TITLE SHEET X X L100 OVERALL SITE/LANDSCAPE PLAN X X L101 OVERALL SITE PLANTING PLAN X X L140 LEVEL 3 AMENITY DECK PLAN X X L141 ROOFTOP SUN DECK PLAN X X GENERAL NOTES 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS RELATING TO THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF WORK. 2. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PLAN LAYOUT AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN AND BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DISCREPANCIES WHICH MAY COMPROMISE THE DESIGN AND/OR INTENT OF THE PROJECT'S LAYOUT. 3. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE WORK AND/OR MATERIALS SUPPLIED. 4. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING ROADS, CURBS/GUTTERS, TRAILS, TREES, LAWNS AND SITE ELEMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. DAMAGE TO SAME SHALL BE REPAIRED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 5. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALIGNMENT AND LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GRADE UTILITIES AND PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PROTECTION FOR SAME BEFORE CONSTRUCTION / MATERIAL INSTALLATION BEGINS (MINIMUM 10'-0" CLEARANCE). 6. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED SO THAT TRENCHES DO NOT CUT THROUGH ROOT SYSTEMS OF ANY EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. 7. EXISTING CONTOURS, TRAILS, VEGETATION, CURB/GUTTER AND OTHER ELEMENTS ARE BASED UPON INFORMATION SUPPLIED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY OTHERS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF SAME. 8. ALIGNMENT AND GRADES OF THE PROPOSED WALKS, TRAILS AND/OR ROADWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO FIELD ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO LOCALIZED TOPOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND TO MINIMIZE TREE REMOVAL AND GRADING. CHANGES IN THE ALIGNMENT AND GRADES MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 9. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE SITE FOR DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANT MATERIAL SELECTIONS AND OTHER SITE CONDITIONS WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL OR WARRANTY. UNDESIRABLE PLANT MATERIAL SELECTIONS OR SITE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORK. 10. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT REPRODUCIBLE AS-BUILT DRAWING(S) OF LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION, IRRIGATION AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION INSTALLATION AND PRIOR TO PROJECT ACCEPTANCE. 11. NO PLANTS WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL FINAL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 12. SOD AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING SHALL BE REPLACED, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 13. WHERE SOD ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF SOD/SEED SHALL BE HELD 1" BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL, SLAB, CURB, ETC. 14. SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTS. ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR IN DRAINAGE SWALES, SOD SHALL BE STAKED SECURELY. 15. PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, ANSI Z60.1. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, DECIDUOUS SHRUBS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 5 CANES AT THE SPECIFIED HEIGHT. ORNAMENTAL TREES SHALL HAVE NO 'V' CROTCHES AND SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 3' FEET ABOVE THE ROOT BALL. STREET AND BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 6' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 16. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE WORK AND/OR MATERIALS SUPPLIED. 17. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ONGOING MAINTENANCE OF NEWLY INSTALLED MATERIALS UNTIL TIME OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE. ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO OWNER ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 18. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANTY NEW PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH ONE CALENDAR YEAR FROM THE DATE OF THE OWNER ACCEPTANCE. NO PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE WILL BE CONSIDERED. 19. PLANTING AREAS (NOT OVER STRUCTURE) RECEIVING GROUND COVER, PERENNIALS, ANNUALS, AND/OR VINES SHALL RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 18" DEPTH OF PLANTING SOIL CONSISTING OF AT LEAST 45 PARTS TOPSOIL, 45 PARTS SCREENED COMPOST OR MANURE AND 10 PARTS SAND. 20. ANNUAL AND PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 4" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO WEED BARRIER. 21. SHRUB BED MASSINGS TO RECEIVE 4" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH FIBER MAT WEED BARRIER. 22. STEEL EDGER TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SHRUBS, PERENNIALS AND ANNUALS WHERE PLANTING BED MEETS SOD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 23. REFER TO CIVIL FOR SITE DEMOLITION INFORMATION. 24. REFER TO CIVIL FOR ADDITIONAL SITE GRADING AND UTILITY INFORMATION 25. IF A DISCREPANCY EXISTS BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF PLANTS SHOWN IN THE PLANT MATERIALS SCHEDULE AND THE PLANS, THE PLANS SHALL GOVERN. 26. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE OUT LOCATION OF ALL PROPOSED TREES FOR APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. IRRIGATION NOTES 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING A PERFORMANCE IRRIGATION PLAN AND SPECIFICATIONS AS PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK WHEN BIDDING. THESE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ORDER AND/OR INSTALLATION. IT SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE THAT SODDED/SEEDED AND PLANTED AREAS ARE IRRIGATED PROPERLY, INCLUDING THOSE AREAS DIRECTLY AROUND AND ABUTTING BUILDING FOUNDATION. 2. SHRUB & PERENNIAL BEDS TO BE IRRIGATED WITH DRIP IRRIGATION. SOD TO BE IRRIGATED WITH SPRAY. 3. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH A WATERING/LAWN IRRIGATION SCHEDULE APPROPRIATE TO THE PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS AND TO PLANT MATERIALS GROWTH REQUIREMENTS. 4. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSURE THAT SOIL CONDITIONS AND COMPACTION ARE ADEQUATE TO ALLOW FOR PROPER DRAINAGE AROUND THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. UNDESIRABLE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORK. IT SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE PROPER SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE IN ALL PLANTING AREAS. 5. COORDINATE IRRIGATION SLEEVING LOCATIONS WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 6. RAIN SENSORS TO BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE IRRIGATION DESIGN. 7. IRRIGATION LIMITS TO EXTEND TO STREET BACK OF CURB. SURVEY NOTES 1. ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING ARE BASED ON AN OWNER-FURNISHED SURVEY. BKV GROUP OFFERS NO GUARANTEE, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, FOR THE ACCURACY OR RELIABILITY OF THE INDICATED EXISTING CONDITIONS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL CRITICAL EXISTING CONDITIONS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EXISTING BUILDING LOCATIONS, UTILITY LOCATIONS AND INVERT ELEVATIONS, AND EXISTING SITE GRADES PRIOR TO THE START OF WORK. 3. ANY OBSERVED DEVIATIONS FROM CONDITIONS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ARCHITECT OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S ATTENTION IMMEDIATELY UPON DISCOVERY. NO WORK SHALL PROCEED IN THE AREAS OF ANY DISCOVERED DEVIATIONS UNTIL THE DIFFERENCES ARE RESOLVED. 1" = 20'-0"L001 1 OVERALL SITE REFERENCE PLAN ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 2 07-30-2021 DD Set 3 08-23-2021 60% CD REVIEW SET 0'10' -0"20' -0"40' -0"80' -0" PROJECT TITLE THE FRED ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 07/26/2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET 08/23/2021 60% CD REVIEW SET A 09/08/2021 ADD-01 09/09/2021 REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMISSION 15.0'ROAD AND WALKWAY EASEMENT64.0'34.0'35' BUILDING SETBACK 35' BUILDING SETBACKKEY NOTES: L5 L26 L26 L27 L25 L25 L21 L8 L3 L4 L5L5 L3 L4 L28 L7 L7 L7 L7 L5 L22 L29 L10 L11 L12 L1L1 L1 L18 L1 L1 L19 L19 L19 L4 L5 L5 L15 L15 L8 L8 L8 L9 L9 L9 L8 L7 L7 L7 L7 L7 L13B L13B L13B L2 L13B L13B L13B L13B L4 L4 L3 L3 L8 L8 L3 L1 L1 L1 L1 L1 L1 L7 L7 L7 L7 L7 L3L3 L7 L2 L2 L2 L2 L2 L2 L2 L2 L31 L32 L14 L14 L14 L14 L14 L14 L14 L14 L14 L14 L14 L14 L14 L14 L14 L14 L14 L13A L13A L13A L13A L13A L13A L13A L13A L13A L13A L13A L13A L13A L13A L13A L13B L13B L13B L13B L24 EX. PLAZA TO REMAINL35 L34 L33 L33 GRAPHIC LEGEND: CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE #1, PLAIN BROOM FINISH CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE #2; INTEGRALLY COLORED, COLOR TBD. PEA GRAVEL AT DOG RUN; 4" MIN DEPTH WOOD LOOK PORCELAIN PAVERS ON RAISED PEDESTAL SYSTEM MASS PLANTING BED; 12" MIN. DEPTH OF PLANTING SOIL MIX, 3" MIN. DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, STEEL EDGER WHEREVER MASS PLANTING BED MEETS SOD OR NATIVE PLANTINGS REFLECTING POOL; 18"H X 6"W CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE CURB WITH WATERPROOF MEMBRANE AND 2" DEPTH OF DECORATIVE STONE AT BASE NATIVE PRAIRIE WILDFLOWER AND GRASS SEED; MESIC MIX BY MINNESOTA NATIVE LANDSCAPES SYNTHETIC TURF OR NATIVE PRAIRIE MIX: TURFGRASS: SOD, IRRIGATED (SEE SPEC) DECOMPOSED GRANITE GARDEN PATH BOARDWALK; 6'W WITH ALUMINUM POSTS AND FRAME, TREATED WOOD DECKING; DESIGN-BUILD BY WICKCRAFT INC. TRUE NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering B K V R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2395-03 Pentagon Park/2395-03 Pentagon Park_LAND_2021.rvt9/7/2021 6:21:37 PMBH BH 2395-03 L100 OVERALL SITE/LANDSCAPE PLAN THE FRED ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 4 09-08-2021 ADD-01 1" = 20'-0"L100 1 OVERALL SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN 0'10' -0"20' -0"40' -0"80' -0" L1 BUILDING ENTRY/EXIT; (SEE ARCH) L2 EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN L3 SURFACE TREATMENT #1; CAST IN PLACE PLAIN CONCRETE;BROOM FINISH-TYP; WITH JOINTING PER SIDEWALK WIDTH & INDICATED ON PLANS; SEE X/L3XX L4 SURFACE TREATMENT #2; CAST IN PLACE COLORED CONCRETE; "SPLIT ROCK CPC-142L" BY CEMSTONE; TOOLED JOINTS @2' O.C. SPACING EACH WAY, LIGHT BROOM FINISH; SEE X/L3XX L5 SURFACE TREATMENT #3; TURFGRASS; SOD; IRRIGATED, TYP. L6 SURFACE TREATMENT #4; PEDESTALPAVING SYSTEM; WOOD LOOK PORCELAIN BASIS OF DESIGN L7 MASS PLANTING BED; 12" MIN.DEPTH PLAINTING SOIL MIX, 3" MIN DEPTH HARDWOOD MULCH, STEEL EDGING WHERE BEDS MEET TURF OR NATIVE SEEDING AREAS; AUTOMATED DRIP IRRIGATION,TYP. L8 DECOMPOSED GRANITE GARDEN PATH; 3" MIN DEPTH, SIZE 3/8" MINUS L9 LIMESTONE BOULDER, SIZE VARIES; NATURAL SPLIT FACE ON ALL SURFACES; EMBED TO LEAVE 12" EXPOSED HEIGHT L10 DOG RUN; 4" DEPTH PEA GRAVEL SURFACE L11 DOG RUN FENCE; 4' TALL BLACK VINYL-COATED CHAIN LINK WITH TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL L12 PICKLEBALL COURT WITH 6' TALL BLACK VINYL-COATED CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL AT NORTH AND WEST EDGES L13A UNIT PATIO; CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE L13B UNIT PATIO; HUNG METAL BALCONY AND STAIR; SEE ARCH. L14 CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE STAIR WITH ALUMINUM HAND RAIL L15 BOARDWALK; BASIS OF DESIGN - 6' WIDE, ALUMINUM POSTS, SPREAD FOOTINGS AND FRAME, WOOD DECKING WITH TOE KICK, DESIGN-BUILD BY WICKCRAFT OR EQUAL L16 RAISED CONCRETE PLANTER CURB; 24" TALL X 6" WIDE WITH 18" OF LIGHT WEIGHT ROOFTOP PLANTING SOIL MIX, 3" MULCH, AND PERENNIAL PLANTINGS L17 REFLECTING POOL; 18" TALL X 6" WIDE CURB WITH WATERPROOF MEMBRANE AND 2" DEPTH OF DECORATIVE STONE AT BASE, FLOAT SWITCH, AUTO-REFILL, OVERFLOW DRAIN L18 SYNTHETIC TURF; BY SYNLAWN L19 MESIC PRAIRIE SEED MIX; BY MINNESOTA NATIVE LANDSCAPES L21 HOT TUB; 18" RAISED WALL WITH TRANSFER BARS AND TILE TBD. INTEGRAL BENCH; 5' DECORATIVE METAL PICKET PERIMETER FENCE L22 FREE STANDING PLANTER; "PLAZA" BY LANDSCAPE FORMS, SIZE 48"SQ. X 32"H, WOOD FINISH, COLOR, WITH INTEGRAL SUBSURFACE IRRIGATION,TYP. L23 GRILLING STATION; 2" GRANITE COUNTERTOP, FINISH HEIGHT 34"; BUILT-IN NATURAL GAS; METAL FRAMED WITH METAL CLADDING TO MATCH BUILDING; NATURAL GAS GRILLS WITH AUTOMATIC SHUT OFF VALVE TIMERS ON ENCLOSURE, TYP; GRILLS-BASIS OF DESIGN-BULL OUTLAW 30"; MODEL # 26039; SEE X/L3XX L24 GAS FIRE PIT; 'ROBATA' BY PALOFORM; 72"L X 24"W, CONCRETE FINISH, BLACK STONE BURN MEDIA L25 DRY STREAM BED; 18" DEEP WITH WATERPROOF LINER; LINE BASE WITH RIVER JACKS VARYING IN SIZE FROM 6"-18"; DIRECT ROOF DRAINS FROM THIS SIDE OF BUILDING INTO TOP POOL L26 BOULDER RETAINING WALL; SEE CIVIL FOR TOP AND BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATIONS L27 LARGE BLOCK CONCRETE RETAINING WALL; SEE CIVIL FOR TOP AND BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATIONS L28 DRY STACK CONCRETE BLOCK RETAINING WALL; DIAMOND BY ANCHOR; SIZE 6" TALL X 8"DEEP X 18"L L29 DOGIPOT WASTE STATION L30 FREESTANDING PLANTER; 'GUS' BY LANDSCAPE FORMS, 22"W X 48"L X 24"T, FINSH THEMALLY MODIFIED ASH L31 YARD HYDRANT; ADD IRRIGATION TO DOG RUN ON A SEPARATE ZONE THAT CAN BE MANUALLY CONTROLLED L32 INCLUDE RADIANT HEAT IN HATCHED AREA OF PAVING (580 SF APPROX.) L33 HANDRAIL ON BOARDWALK (1 SIDE) L34 BAR RAIL AT BOARDWALK EDGE L35 NEW WALK CONNECTION TO EXISTING PATIO L36 RECTANGULAR WRAP TO SCREEN EXHAUST; 4-SIDED PERFORATED METAL PANEL WRAP, EACH PANEL 3'W X 6'T 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 PROJECT TITLE THE FRED ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 07/26/2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET 08/23/2021 60% CD REVIEW SET A 09/08/2021 ADD-01 09/09/2021 REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMISSION 15.0'ROAD AND WALKWAY EASEMENT64.0'34.0'PROPOSED PLANT SCHEDULE: TRUE NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2395-03 Pentagon Park/2395-03 Pentagon Park_LAND_2021.rvt8/23/2021 4:09:40 PMAuthor Checker 2395-03 L101 OVERALL SITE PLANTING PLAN PENTAGON PARK HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 2 07-30-2021 DD Set 3 08-23-2021 60% CD REVIEW SET 1" = 20'-0"L101 1 OVERALL SITE PLANTING PLAN QTY SYM COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME PLANTING SIZE COMMENTS TREES 9 EX EXISTING TREES (SEE CIVIL) - N/A PERENNIALS/GROUNDCOVERS/VINES 20 pt BOSTON IVY Parthenocissus tricuspidata 'vetchii' #1 CONT. DECIDUOUS UNDERSTORY TREES 20 MP PINK SPIRES CRAB Malus 'Pink Spires' 2" B&B 39 PF PINK FLAIR CHERRY Prunus sargentii 'JFS-KW58 1.5" B&B 10 PT PRAIRIE GOLD ASPEN Populus tremuloides 'NEarb' 1.5" B&B DECIDUOUS SHRUBS 60 Am IROQUOIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRY Aronia melanocarpa 'Iroquois Beauty' #5 CONT. 80 Ca RUBY SPICE CLETHRA Clethra alnifolia 'Ruby Spice' #5 CONT. 100 Cs ALLEMAN'S COMPACT DOGWOOD Cornus sericea 'Alleman's Compact' #5 CONT. 107 Dl DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE Diervilla lonicera #5 CONT. 80 Hk KALM AMES HYPERICUM Hypericum kalmianum 'Ames' #2 CONT. 60 Ra GRO LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC Rhus aromatica 'Gro Low' #5 CONT. 136 Sm DWARF KOREAN LILAC Syringa meyeri' Palibin' #5 CONT. 120 Ss SEM FALSE SPIREA Sorbaria sorbifolia 'Sem'(PP16,336) #2 CONT. 6 Vd BLUE MUFFIN VIBURNUM Viburnum dentatum 'Christom' #5 CONT. 102 Vd LITTLE LIME HYDRANGEA Hydrangea paniculata 'Little Lime' #5 CONT. DECIDUOUS CANOPY TREES 38 AR RED SUNSET MAPLE Acer rubrum 'Franksred' 1.5" CAL. 24 CO COMMON HONEYLOCUST Celtis occidentalis 2.5" CAL. 13 COP PRAIRIE SENTINEL HACKBERRY Celtis occidentalis 'JFS-KUS1' 3" CAL. 14 GB Autumn gold ginkgo Ginkgo biloba 'Autumn Gold' 2.5" CAL. 25 GT IMPERIAL HONEYLOCUST Gleditsia triancanthos var. inermis 'Impcole' 2.5" CAL. 23 QB SWAMP WHITE OAK Quercus bicolor 2.5" CAL. 8 SP PRAIRIE CASCADE WILLOW Salix 'Prairie Cascade' 2.5" CAL. CONIFEROUS SHRUBS 19 Jc SEA GREEN JUNIPER Juniperus chinensis 'Sea Green' #5 CONT. CONIFEROUS EVERGREEN TREES 3 PA NORWAY SPRUCE Picea abies 8' B&B 5 PS WHITE PINE Pinus strobus 8' B&B 2 AG AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY Amelanchir x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance' 2" B&B 2 BN RIVER CLUMP BIRCH Betula nigra 8' B&B 4 CC BLUE BEECH Carpinus caroliniana #10 CONT. 0'10' -0"20' -0"40' -0"80' -0" PROJECT TITLE THE FRED ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 07/26/2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET 08/23/2021 60% CD REVIEW SET A 09/08/2021 ADD-01 09/09/2021 REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMISSION PROPOSED PLANT SCHEDULE: GRAPHIC LEGEND: CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE #1, PLAIN BROOM FINISH CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE #2; INTEGRALLY COLORED, COLOR TBD. PEA GRAVEL AT DOG RUN; 4" MIN DEPTH WOOD LOOK PORCELAIN PAVERS ON RAISED PEDESTAL SYSTEM MASS PLANTING BED; 12" MIN. DEPTH OF PLANTING SOIL MIX, 3" MIN. DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, STEEL EDGER WHEREVER MASS PLANTING BED MEETS SOD OR NATIVE PLANTINGS REFLECTING POOL; 18"H X 6"W CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE CURB WITH WATERPROOF MEMBRANE AND 2" DEPTH OF DECORATIVE STONE AT BASE NATIVE PRAIRIE WILDFLOWER AND GRASS SEED; MESIC MIX BY MINNESOTA NATIVE LANDSCAPES SYNTHETIC TURF OR NATIVE PRAIRIE MIX: TURFGRASS: SOD, IRRIGATED (SEE SPEC) DECOMPOSED GRANITE GARDEN PATH BOARDWALK; 6'W WITH ALUMINUM POSTS AND FRAME, TREATED WOOD DECKING; DESIGN-BUILD BY WICKCRAFT INC. 16.1 43 6 7 8 10 12 13 14 15 J 11 A 5 H.2G.8 7.5 3.8 G.4 9 5.2 6.3 6.6 7.3 8.3 10.3 11.2 12.2 13.2 14.2 15.1 10.4 16 L24 L23L4 L4 L17 L22L22L22 L6 L6 L22L22L22 L22L22 L18 L6 L30 L30 L30 4 ss 1 PF 1 PF 1 PF 1 PF 16 OC 1 PF 1 PF 1 PF 1 PF 8 ss KEY NOTES: TRUE NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2395-03 Pentagon Park/2395-03 Pentagon Park_LAND_2021.rvt9/7/2021 6:21:41 PMAuthor Checker 2395-03 L140 LEVEL 3 AMENITY DECK PLAN THE FRED QTY SYM COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME PLANTING SIZE COMMENTS TREES 9 EX EXISTING TREES (SEE CIVIL) - N/A PERENNIALS/GROUNDCOVERS/VINES 16 OC CINNAMON FERN Osmundia cinnamomia #1 CONT. 20 pt BOSTON IVY Parthenocissus tricuspidata 'vetchii' #1 CONT. 12 ss LITTLE BLUESTEM 'BLUE HEAVEN' Schizachyrium scoparium 'Minnblue A' #1 CONT. DECIDUOUS UNDERSTORY TREES 20 MP PINK SPIRES CRAB Malus 'Pink Spires' 2" B&B 41 PF PINK FLAIR CHERRY Prunus sargentii 'JFS-KW58 1.5" B&B 10 PT PRAIRIE GOLD ASPEN Populus tremuloides 'NEarb' 1.5" B&B DECIDUOUS SHRUBS 60 Am IROQUOIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRY Aronia melanocarpa 'Iroquois Beauty' #5 CONT. 80 Ca RUBY SPICE CLETHRA Clethra alnifolia 'Ruby Spice' #5 CONT. 100 Cs ALLEMAN'S COMPACT DOGWOOD Cornus sericea 'Alleman's Compact' #5 CONT. 107 Dl DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE Diervilla lonicera #5 CONT. 80 Hk KALM AMES HYPERICUM Hypericum kalmianum 'Ames' #2 CONT. 60 Ra GRO LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC Rhus aromatica 'Gro Low' #5 CONT. 136 Sm DWARF KOREAN LILAC Syringa meyeri' Palibin' #5 CONT. 120 Ss SEM FALSE SPIREA Sorbaria sorbifolia 'Sem'(PP16,336) #2 CONT. 6 Vd BLUE MUFFIN VIBURNUM Viburnum dentatum 'Christom' #5 CONT. 102 Vd LITTLE LIME HYDRANGEA Hydrangea paniculata 'Little Lime' #5 CONT. DECIDUOUS CANOPY TREES 38 AR RED SUNSET MAPLE Acer rubrum 'Franksred' 1.5" CAL. 24 CO COMMON HONEYLOCUST Celtis occidentalis 2.5" CAL. 13 COP PRAIRIE SENTINEL HACKBERRY Celtis occidentalis 'JFS-KUS1' 3" CAL. 14 GB Autumn gold ginkgo Ginkgo biloba 'Autumn Gold' 2.5" CAL. 25 GT IMPERIAL HONEYLOCUST Gleditsia triancanthos var. inermis 'Impcole' 2.5" CAL. 23 QB SWAMP WHITE OAK Quercus bicolor 2.5" CAL. 8 SP PRAIRIE CASCADE WILLOW Salix 'Prairie Cascade' 2.5" CAL. CONIFEROUS SHRUBS 19 Jc SEA GREEN JUNIPER Juniperus chinensis 'Sea Green' #5 CONT. CONIFEROUS EVERGREEN TREES 3 PA NORWAY SPRUCE Picea abies 8' B&B 5 PS WHITE PINE Pinus strobus 8' B&B 2 AG AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY Amelanchir x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance' 2" B&B 2 BN RIVER CLUMP BIRCH Betula nigra 8' B&B ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 4 09-08-2021 ADD-01 1" = 10'-0"L140 1 LEVEL 3 AMENITY DECK PLAN 0'5' -0"10' -0"20' -0"40' -0" L1 BUILDING ENTRY/EXIT; (SEE ARCH) L2 EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN L3 SURFACE TREATMENT #1; CAST IN PLACE PLAIN CONCRETE;BROOM FINISH-TYP; WITH JOINTING PER SIDEWALK WIDTH & INDICATED ON PLANS; SEE X/L3XX L4 SURFACE TREATMENT #2; CAST IN PLACE COLORED CONCRETE; "SPLIT ROCK CPC-142L" BY CEMSTONE; TOOLED JOINTS @2' O.C. SPACING EACH WAY, LIGHT BROOM FINISH; SEE X/L3XX L5 SURFACE TREATMENT #3; TURFGRASS; SOD; IRRIGATED, TYP. L6 SURFACE TREATMENT #4; PEDESTALPAVING SYSTEM; WOOD LOOK PORCELAIN BASIS OF DESIGN L7 MASS PLANTING BED; 12" MIN.DEPTH PLAINTING SOIL MIX, 3" MIN DEPTH HARDWOOD MULCH, STEEL EDGING WHERE BEDS MEET TURF OR NATIVE SEEDING AREAS; AUTOMATED DRIP IRRIGATION,TYP. L8 DECOMPOSED GRANITE GARDEN PATH; 3" MIN DEPTH, SIZE 3/8" MINUS L9 LIMESTONE BOULDER, SIZE VARIES; NATURAL SPLIT FACE ON ALL SURFACES; EMBED TO LEAVE 12" EXPOSED HEIGHT L10 DOG RUN; 4" DEPTH PEA GRAVEL SURFACE L11 DOG RUN FENCE; 4' TALL BLACK VINYL-COATED CHAIN LINK WITH TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL L12 PICKLEBALL COURT WITH 6' TALL BLACK VINYL-COATED CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL AT NORTH AND WEST EDGES L13A UNIT PATIO; CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE L13B UNIT PATIO; HUNG METAL BALCONY AND STAIR; SEE ARCH. L14 CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE STAIR WITH ALUMINUM HAND RAIL L15 BOARDWALK; BASIS OF DESIGN - 6' WIDE, ALUMINUM POSTS, SPREAD FOOTINGS AND FRAME, WOOD DECKING WITH TOE KICK, DESIGN-BUILD BY WICKCRAFT OR EQUAL L16 RAISED CONCRETE PLANTER CURB; 24" TALL X 6" WIDE WITH 18" OF LIGHT WEIGHT ROOFTOP PLANTING SOIL MIX, 3" MULCH, AND PERENNIAL PLANTINGS L17 REFLECTING POOL; 18" TALL X 6" WIDE CURB WITH WATERPROOF MEMBRANE AND 2" DEPTH OF DECORATIVE STONE AT BASE, FLOAT SWITCH, AUTO-REFILL, OVERFLOW DRAIN L18 SYNTHETIC TURF; BY SYNLAWN L19 MESIC PRAIRIE SEED MIX; BY MINNESOTA NATIVE LANDSCAPES L21 HOT TUB; 18" RAISED WALL WITH TRANSFER BARS AND TILE TBD. INTEGRAL BENCH; 5' DECORATIVE METAL PICKET PERIMETER FENCE L22 FREE STANDING PLANTER; "PLAZA" BY LANDSCAPE FORMS, SIZE 48"SQ. X 32"H, WOOD FINISH, COLOR, WITH INTEGRAL SUBSURFACE IRRIGATION,TYP. L23 GRILLING STATION; 2" GRANITE COUNTERTOP, FINISH HEIGHT 34"; BUILT-IN NATURAL GAS; METAL FRAMED WITH METAL CLADDING TO MATCH BUILDING; NATURAL GAS GRILLS WITH AUTOMATIC SHUT OFF VALVE TIMERS ON ENCLOSURE, TYP; GRILLS-BASIS OF DESIGN-BULL OUTLAW 30"; MODEL # 26039; SEE X/L3XX L24 GAS FIRE PIT; 'ROBATA' BY PALOFORM; 72"L X 24"W, CONCRETE FINISH, BLACK STONE BURN MEDIA L25 DRY STREAM BED; 18" DEEP WITH WATERPROOF LINER; LINE BASE WITH RIVER JACKS VARYING IN SIZE FROM 6"-18"; DIRECT ROOF DRAINS FROM THIS SIDE OF BUILDING INTO TOP POOL L26 BOULDER RETAINING WALL; SEE CIVIL FOR TOP AND BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATIONS L27 LARGE BLOCK CONCRETE RETAINING WALL; SEE CIVIL FOR TOP AND BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATIONS L28 DRY STACK CONCRETE BLOCK RETAINING WALL; DIAMOND BY ANCHOR; SIZE 6" TALL X 8"DEEP X 18"L L29 DOGIPOT WASTE STATION L30 FREESTANDING PLANTER; 'GUS' BY LANDSCAPE FORMS, 22"W X 48"L X 24"T, FINSH THEMALLY MODIFIED ASH L31 YARD HYDRANT; ADD IRRIGATION TO DOG RUN ON A SEPARATE ZONE THAT CAN BE MANUALLY CONTROLLED L32 INCLUDE RADIANT HEAT IN HATCHED AREA OF PAVING (580 SF APPROX.) L33 HANDRAIL ON BOARDWALK (1 SIDE) L34 BAR RAIL AT BOARDWALK EDGE L35 NEW WALK CONNECTION TO EXISTING PATIO L36 RECTANGULAR WRAP TO SCREEN EXHAUST; 4-SIDED PERFORATED METAL PANEL WRAP, EACH PANEL 3'W X 6'T 4 4 4 PROJECT TITLE THE FRED ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 07/26/2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET 08/23/2021 60% CD REVIEW SET A 09/08/2021 ADD-01 09/09/2021 REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMISSION 8 10 C D E F G 11 7.5 9 7.3 8.3 10.3 10.4 L16 L6 L16 L16 L36 L6 PROPOSED PLANT SCHEDULE: KEY NOTES: GRAPHIC LEGEND: CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE #1, PLAIN BROOM FINISH CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE #2; INTEGRALLY COLORED, COLOR TBD. PEA GRAVEL AT DOG RUN; 4" MIN DEPTH WOOD LOOK PORCELAIN PAVERS ON RAISED PEDESTAL SYSTEM MASS PLANTING BED; 12" MIN. DEPTH OF PLANTING SOIL MIX, 3" MIN. DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, STEEL EDGER WHEREVER MASS PLANTING BED MEETS SOD OR NATIVE PLANTINGS REFLECTING POOL; 18"H X 6"W CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE CURB WITH WATERPROOF MEMBRANE AND 2" DEPTH OF DECORATIVE STONE AT BASE NATIVE PRAIRIE WILDFLOWER AND GRASS SEED; MESIC MIX BY MINNESOTA NATIVE LANDSCAPES SYNTHETIC TURF OR NATIVE PRAIRIE MIX: TURFGRASS: SOD, IRRIGATED (SEE SPEC) DECOMPOSED GRANITE GARDEN PATH BOARDWALK; 6'W WITH ALUMINUM POSTS AND FRAME, TREATED WOOD DECKING; DESIGN-BUILD BY WICKCRAFT INC. TRUE NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2395-03 Pentagon Park/2395-03 Pentagon Park_LAND_2021.rvt9/7/2021 6:21:42 PMAuthor Checker 2395-03 L141 ROOFTOP SUN DECK PLAN THE FRED ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 4 09-08-2021 ADD-01 1/8" = 1'-0"L141 1 ROOFTOP SUN DECK PLAN 0'4' -0"8' -0"16' -0"32' -0" QTY SYM COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME PLANTING SIZE COMMENTS TREES 9 EX EXISTING TREES (SEE CIVIL) - N/A PERENNIALS/GROUNDCOVERS/VINES 16 OC CINNAMON FERN Osmundia cinnamomia #1 CONT. 20 pt BOSTON IVY Parthenocissus tricuspidata 'vetchii' #1 CONT. 12 ss LITTLE BLUESTEM 'BLUE HEAVEN' Schizachyrium scoparium 'Minnblue A' #1 CONT. DECIDUOUS UNDERSTORY TREES 20 MP PINK SPIRES CRAB Malus 'Pink Spires' 2" B&B 41 PF PINK FLAIR CHERRY Prunus sargentii 'JFS-KW58 1.5" B&B 10 PT PRAIRIE GOLD ASPEN Populus tremuloides 'NEarb' 1.5" B&B DECIDUOUS SHRUBS 60 Am IROQUOIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRY Aronia melanocarpa 'Iroquois Beauty' #5 CONT. 80 Ca RUBY SPICE CLETHRA Clethra alnifolia 'Ruby Spice' #5 CONT. 100 Cs ALLEMAN'S COMPACT DOGWOOD Cornus sericea 'Alleman's Compact' #5 CONT. 107 Dl DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE Diervilla lonicera #5 CONT. 80 Hk KALM AMES HYPERICUM Hypericum kalmianum 'Ames' #2 CONT. 60 Ra GRO LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC Rhus aromatica 'Gro Low' #5 CONT. 136 Sm DWARF KOREAN LILAC Syringa meyeri' Palibin' #5 CONT. 120 Ss SEM FALSE SPIREA Sorbaria sorbifolia 'Sem'(PP16,336) #2 CONT. 6 Vd BLUE MUFFIN VIBURNUM Viburnum dentatum 'Christom' #5 CONT. 102 Vd LITTLE LIME HYDRANGEA Hydrangea paniculata 'Little Lime' #5 CONT. DECIDUOUS CANOPY TREES 38 AR RED SUNSET MAPLE Acer rubrum 'Franksred' 1.5" CAL. 24 CO COMMON HONEYLOCUST Celtis occidentalis 2.5" CAL. 13 COP PRAIRIE SENTINEL HACKBERRY Celtis occidentalis 'JFS-KUS1' 3" CAL. 14 GB Autumn gold ginkgo Ginkgo biloba 'Autumn Gold' 2.5" CAL. 25 GT IMPERIAL HONEYLOCUST Gleditsia triancanthos var. inermis 'Impcole' 2.5" CAL. 23 QB SWAMP WHITE OAK Quercus bicolor 2.5" CAL. 8 SP PRAIRIE CASCADE WILLOW Salix 'Prairie Cascade' 2.5" CAL. CONIFEROUS SHRUBS 19 Jc SEA GREEN JUNIPER Juniperus chinensis 'Sea Green' #5 CONT. CONIFEROUS EVERGREEN TREES 3 PA NORWAY SPRUCE Picea abies 8' B&B 5 PS WHITE PINE Pinus strobus 8' B&B 2 AG AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY Amelanchir x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance' 2" B&B 2 BN RIVER CLUMP BIRCH Betula nigra 8' B&B L1 BUILDING ENTRY/EXIT; (SEE ARCH) L2 EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN L3 SURFACE TREATMENT #1; CAST IN PLACE PLAIN CONCRETE;BROOM FINISH-TYP; WITH JOINTING PER SIDEWALK WIDTH & INDICATED ON PLANS; SEE X/L3XX L4 SURFACE TREATMENT #2; CAST IN PLACE COLORED CONCRETE; "SPLIT ROCK CPC-142L" BY CEMSTONE; TOOLED JOINTS @2' O.C. SPACING EACH WAY, LIGHT BROOM FINISH; SEE X/L3XX L5 SURFACE TREATMENT #3; TURFGRASS; SOD; IRRIGATED, TYP. L6 SURFACE TREATMENT #4; PEDESTALPAVING SYSTEM; WOOD LOOK PORCELAIN BASIS OF DESIGN L7 MASS PLANTING BED; 12" MIN.DEPTH PLAINTING SOIL MIX, 3" MIN DEPTH HARDWOOD MULCH, STEEL EDGING WHERE BEDS MEET TURF OR NATIVE SEEDING AREAS; AUTOMATED DRIP IRRIGATION,TYP. L8 DECOMPOSED GRANITE GARDEN PATH; 3" MIN DEPTH, SIZE 3/8" MINUS L9 LIMESTONE BOULDER, SIZE VARIES; NATURAL SPLIT FACE ON ALL SURFACES; EMBED TO LEAVE 12" EXPOSED HEIGHT L10 DOG RUN; 4" DEPTH PEA GRAVEL SURFACE L11 DOG RUN FENCE; 4' TALL BLACK VINYL-COATED CHAIN LINK WITH TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL L12 PICKLEBALL COURT WITH 6' TALL BLACK VINYL-COATED CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL AT NORTH AND WEST EDGES L13A UNIT PATIO; CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE L13B UNIT PATIO; HUNG METAL BALCONY AND STAIR; SEE ARCH. L14 CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE STAIR WITH ALUMINUM HAND RAIL L15 BOARDWALK; BASIS OF DESIGN - 6' WIDE, ALUMINUM POSTS, SPREAD FOOTINGS AND FRAME, WOOD DECKING WITH TOE KICK, DESIGN-BUILD BY WICKCRAFT OR EQUAL L16 RAISED CONCRETE PLANTER CURB; 24" TALL X 6" WIDE WITH 18" OF LIGHT WEIGHT ROOFTOP PLANTING SOIL MIX, 3" MULCH, AND PERENNIAL PLANTINGS L17 REFLECTING POOL; 18" TALL X 6" WIDE CURB WITH WATERPROOF MEMBRANE AND 2" DEPTH OF DECORATIVE STONE AT BASE, FLOAT SWITCH, AUTO-REFILL, OVERFLOW DRAIN L18 SYNTHETIC TURF; BY SYNLAWN L19 MESIC PRAIRIE SEED MIX; BY MINNESOTA NATIVE LANDSCAPES L21 HOT TUB; 18" RAISED WALL WITH TRANSFER BARS AND TILE TBD. INTEGRAL BENCH; 5' DECORATIVE METAL PICKET PERIMETER FENCE L22 FREE STANDING PLANTER; "PLAZA" BY LANDSCAPE FORMS, SIZE 48"SQ. X 32"H, WOOD FINISH, COLOR, WITH INTEGRAL SUBSURFACE IRRIGATION,TYP. L23 GRILLING STATION; 2" GRANITE COUNTERTOP, FINISH HEIGHT 34"; BUILT-IN NATURAL GAS; METAL FRAMED WITH METAL CLADDING TO MATCH BUILDING; NATURAL GAS GRILLS WITH AUTOMATIC SHUT OFF VALVE TIMERS ON ENCLOSURE, TYP; GRILLS-BASIS OF DESIGN-BULL OUTLAW 30"; MODEL # 26039; SEE X/L3XX L24 GAS FIRE PIT; 'ROBATA' BY PALOFORM; 72"L X 24"W, CONCRETE FINISH, BLACK STONE BURN MEDIA L25 DRY STREAM BED; 18" DEEP WITH WATERPROOF LINER; LINE BASE WITH RIVER JACKS VARYING IN SIZE FROM 6"-18"; DIRECT ROOF DRAINS FROM THIS SIDE OF BUILDING INTO TOP POOL L26 BOULDER RETAINING WALL; SEE CIVIL FOR TOP AND BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATIONS L27 LARGE BLOCK CONCRETE RETAINING WALL; SEE CIVIL FOR TOP AND BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATIONS L28 DRY STACK CONCRETE BLOCK RETAINING WALL; DIAMOND BY ANCHOR; SIZE 6" TALL X 8"DEEP X 18"L L29 DOGIPOT WASTE STATION L30 FREESTANDING PLANTER; 'GUS' BY LANDSCAPE FORMS, 22"W X 48"L X 24"T, FINSH THEMALLY MODIFIED ASH L31 YARD HYDRANT; ADD IRRIGATION TO DOG RUN ON A SEPARATE ZONE THAT CAN BE MANUALLY CONTROLLED L32 INCLUDE RADIANT HEAT IN HATCHED AREA OF PAVING (580 SF APPROX.) L33 HANDRAIL ON BOARDWALK (1 SIDE) L34 BAR RAIL AT BOARDWALK EDGE L35 NEW WALK CONNECTION TO EXISTING PATIO L36 RECTANGULAR WRAP TO SCREEN EXHAUST; 4-SIDED PERFORATED METAL PANEL WRAP, EACH PANEL 3'W X 6'T 4 PROJECT TITLE THE FRED ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 07/26/2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET 08/23/2021 60% CD REVIEW SET A 09/08/2021 ADD-01 09/09/2021 REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMISSION 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:21105............04/30/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/30/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC0.0TITLE SHEET............PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIALEDINA, MINNESOTASHEET INDEXSHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEC0.0TITLE SHEETSITE SURVEYV1.0UTILITY PLANC4.0ISSUED FOR: CITY SUBMITTALSWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONSSW1.0GRADING PLANC3.0C5.0C5.1CIVIL DETAILSSWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONSSW1.1SWPPP - DETAILSSW1.2C2.0SITE PLANSWPPP - NARRATIVESW1.3CIVIL DETAILSC1.0REMOVALS PLANC5.2CIVIL DETAILSKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRSWPPP - ATTACHMENTSSW1.4SWPPP - ATTACHMENTSSW1.5DEVELOPER / PROPERTY OWNER:SOLHEM COMPANIES724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONTACT: CURT GUNSBURY612-598-9416ENGINEER:CIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35TH STREETSUITE 200ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416612-615-0060SURVEYOR:GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER:BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION11001 HAMPSHIRE AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55438CONTACT: GERARD HAHN952-995-2000ARCHITECT / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:BKV GROUP222 N 2ND STSUITE 101MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONTACT: MATHEW H. NUGENT612-339-3752SUNDE LAND SURVEYING9001 E BLOOMINGTON FWY, SUITE 118BLOOMINGTON, MN 55420-3435CONTACT: LEONARD CARLSONSITE LOCATION MAPNSITE LOCATIONALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN AREAPPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL"(651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS,48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THECONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIESTHAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NOCOST TO THE OWNER.C5.3CIVIL DETAILS REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONV1.0SITE SURVEY............ CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONST.LIMITSREMOVE EX BUILDING, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, FOOTINGS& BASE MATERIALS, PER LOCAL STATE & FEDERAL STANDARDS.REMOVE/DISCONNECT ALL SERVICES & UTILITIES PER UTILITYCOMPANY AND/OR L.G.U. STANDARDSREMOVE EXISTINGLIGHT POLE, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT ANDBASE MATERIAL, PARKING SIGNS,BOLLARDS, LIGHT POLES, ETC., TYP.REMOVE EXISTING TREESAND ROOT BALLS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING CURBAND GUTTER, SAWCUTFULL DEPTH, TYP.REMOVE ALL EXISTINGUTILITY SERVICES PERUTILITY COMPANY ANDCITY STANDARDSEXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.EXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING TREESAND ROOT BALLS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT AND BASE MATERIAL,CONCRETE CURB, WALLS, WALK, & STAIRS, UTILITYMANHOLES, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, LIGHT POLES,LANDSCAPED AREA, AND PARKING SIGNS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENTAND BASE MATERIAL ANDPARKING SIGNS, TYP.REMOVE EX BUILDING, STRUCTURES,FOUNDATIONS, FOOTINGS & BASEMATERIALS, PER LOCAL STATE &FEDERAL STANDARDS.REMOVE/DISCONNECT ALL SERVICES& UTILITIES PER UTILITY COMPANYAND/OR L.G.U. STANDARDSREMOVE EXISTING CURBAND GUTTER, SAWCUTFULL DEPTH, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING CURBAND GUTTER, SAWCUTFULL DEPTH, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGCURB AND GUTTER,TYP.REMOVE EXISTING UTILITYSERVICES PER CITY STANDARDSREMOVE EXISTINGUTILITY SERVICES PERCITY STANDARDSREMOVE EXISTING HYDRANTAND VALVE, COORD. W/ CITYREMOVE EXISTING UTILITYSERVICES PER CITY STANDARDSREMOVE EXISTING LANDSCAPING,SHRUBS, BUSHES, AND ROOTBALLS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGLANDSCAPING,SHRUBS, BUSHES,TREES AND ROOTBALLS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING STORMCB AND PARTIAL PIPE TOPROPERTY LINE, PLUGEXISTING HYDRANT TO REMAIN, PROTECTFROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION.REMOVE EXISTING UNDERGROUND TANKPER LOCAL STATE & FEDERAL STANDARDSEXISTING BUILDINGTO REMAIN,PROTECT FROMDAMAGE DURINGCONSTRUCTION.EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE WITHINPROPERTY LINE TO REMAIN, PROTECTFROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION.EXISTING CURB TO REMAIN, PROTECTFROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION.REMOVE EXISTING SIGN,COORD. W/ OWNERREMOVE EXISTING SIGN,COORD. W/ OWNEREXISTING SIGN TO REMAIN,PROTECT FROM DAMAGEDURING CONSTRUCTION.SAWCUT FULLDEPTH, TYP.SAWCUT FULLDEPTH, TYP.SAWCUT FULLDEPTH, TYP.SAWCUT FULLDEPTH, FOR CURBMEDIANS, TYP.SAWCUT FULLDEPTH, FOR CURBMEDIANS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGLANDSCAPING,TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGPARTIAL WATERMAINSERVICE PER CITYSTANDARDSREMOVE EXISTING STORMCB AND PARTIAL PIPE TOPROPERTY LINE, PLUGREMOVE EX BUILDING, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, FOOTINGS& BASE MATERIALS, PER LOCAL STATE & FEDERAL STANDARDS.REMOVE/DISCONNECT ALL SERVICES & UTILITIES PER UTILITYCOMPANY AND/OR L.G.U. STANDARDSREMOVE EXISTINGLIGHT POLE, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT ANDBASE MATERIAL, PARKING SIGNS,BOLLARDS, LIGHT POLES, ETC., TYP.REMOVE EXISTING TREESAND ROOT BALLS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING CURBAND GUTTER, SAWCUTFULL DEPTH, TYP.REMOVE ALL EXISTINGUTILITY SERVICES PERUTILITY COMPANY ANDCITY STANDARDSEXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.EXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING TREESAND ROOT BALLS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT AND BASE MATERIAL,CONCRETE CURB, WALLS, WALK, & STAIRS, UTILITYMANHOLES, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, LIGHT POLES,LANDSCAPED AREA, AND PARKING SIGNS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENTAND BASE MATERIAL ANDPARKING SIGNS, TYP.REMOVE EX BUILDING, STRUCTURES,FOUNDATIONS, FOOTINGS & BASEMATERIALS, PER LOCAL STATE &FEDERAL STANDARDS.REMOVE/DISCONNECT ALL SERVICES& UTILITIES PER UTILITY COMPANYAND/OR L.G.U. STANDARDSREMOVE EXISTING CURBAND GUTTER, SAWCUTFULL DEPTH, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING CURBAND GUTTER, SAWCUTFULL DEPTH, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGCURB AND GUTTER,TYP.REMOVE EXISTING UTILITYSERVICES PER CITY STANDARDSREMOVE EXISTINGUTILITY SERVICES PERCITY STANDARDSREMOVE EXISTING HYDRANTAND VALVE, COORD. W/ CITYREMOVE EXISTING UTILITYSERVICES PER CITY STANDARDSREMOVE EXISTING LANDSCAPING,SHRUBS, BUSHES, AND ROOTBALLS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGLANDSCAPING,SHRUBS, BUSHES,TREES AND ROOTBALLS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING STORMCB AND PARTIAL PIPE TOPROPERTY LINE, PLUGEXISTING HYDRANT TO REMAIN, PROTECTFROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION.REMOVE EXISTING UNDERGROUND TANKPER LOCAL STATE & FEDERAL STANDARDSEXISTING BUILDINGTO REMAIN,PROTECT FROMDAMAGE DURINGCONSTRUCTION.EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE WITHINPROPERTY LINE TO REMAIN, PROTECTFROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION.EXISTING CURB TO REMAIN, PROTECTFROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION.REMOVE EXISTING SIGN,COORD. W/ OWNERREMOVE EXISTING SIGN,COORD. W/ OWNEREXISTING SIGN TO REMAIN,PROTECT FROM DAMAGEDURING CONSTRUCTION.SAWCUT FULLDEPTH, TYP.SAWCUT FULLDEPTH, TYP.SAWCUT FULLDEPTH, TYP.SAWCUT FULLDEPTH, FOR CURBMEDIANS, TYP.SAWCUT FULLDEPTH, FOR CURBMEDIANS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGLANDSCAPING,TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGPARTIAL WATERMAINSERVICE PER CITYSTANDARDSREMOVE EXISTING STORMCB AND PARTIAL PIPE TOPROPERTY LINE, PLUGREMOVALS LEGEND:TREE PROTECTIONREMOVAL OF PAVEMENT AND ALL BASE MATERIAL,INCLUDING BIT., CONC., AND GRAVEL PVMTS.REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE INCLUDING ALLFOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS.TREE REMOVAL - INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPS4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:21105............04/30/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/30/2101" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC1.0REMOVALS PLAN............Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallREX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALREMOVE CURB AND GUTTER. IF IN RIGHT-OF-WAY,COORDINATE WITH LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT.REMOVAL NOTES:1.SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORM WATERMANAGEMENT PLAN.2.REMOVAL OF MATERIALS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT, STATE AND LOCALREGULATIONS.3.REMOVAL OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTIONACTIVITIES.4.EXISTING PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR THE NEAREST JOINTFOR PROPOSED PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS.5.REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF TO A LEGAL OFF-SITE LOCATION AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATEAND LOCAL REGULATIONS.6.ABANDON, REMOVAL, CONNECTION, AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE.COORDINATE WITH PROPOSED PLANS.7.EXISTING ON-SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OFTHE CONTRACT.8.PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE CONSIDERED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THEDRAWINGS. WORK WITHIN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL INCLUDE STAGING, DEMOLITION ANDCLEAN-UP OPERATIONS AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.9.MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWN ON THE PLANAND PER CITY REQUIREMENTS.10.DAMAGE BEYOND THE PROPERTY LIMITS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE REPAIRED IN A MANNERAPPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY.11.PROPOSED WORK (BUILDING AND CIVIL) SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ONTHE DRAWINGS AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.12.SITE SECURITY MAY BE NECESSARY AND PROVIDED IN A MANNER TO PROHIBIT VANDALISM, AND THEFT, DURINGAND AFTER NORMAL WORK HOURS, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. SECURITY MATERIALSSHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY.13.VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTION ACCESS DURINGNORMAL OPERATING HOURS. AT NO POINT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT SHALL CIRCULATIONOF ADJACENT STREETS BE BLOCKED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.14.ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTAMANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BELIMITED TO, SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALLREMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THECITY.15.SHORING FOR BUILDING EXCAVATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND ASAPPROVED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.16.STAGING, DEMOLITION, AND CLEAN-UP AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THEDRAWINGS AND MAINTAINED IN A MANNER AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.17.ALL EXISTING SITE TRAFFIC/REGULATORY SIGNAGE TO BE INVENTORIED AND IF REMOVED FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHALL BE RETURNED TO LGU.18.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL"(651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THECONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NOCOST TO THE OWNER.CITY OF EDINA REMOVAL NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5EROSION CONTROL NOTES: GUESTSUITEPUBCOWORK LOUNGE CONF.FITNESSWEIGHTROOMFITNESSYOGAGAME ROOMSAUNAPOOLCLUB ROOMRAMPDNMECH.326C TANDEM4 C19C587 STALLS57 C6RESIDENTIAL UNITSRESIDENTIAL UNITSRESIDENTIAL UNITS3CNOPARKING12187754332435' BUILDING SETBACK35' BUILDING SETBACK35' BUILDING SETBACK20' BUILDING SETBACKCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONST.LIMITS55.7'56.2'86.7'76.7'43.8'55.7'9.0'40.0'20.0'TYP.9.0' TYP.5.3'8.5'TYP.6.3'20.0'5.7'20.0'7.3'22.0'5.1'5.0'5.0'8.5' TYP.8.9'46.6'18.6'26.4'28.3'16.8'13.3'10.0'9.0'TYP.55.7'51.7'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R100.0'R78.0'R3.0'R6.0'R3.0'R8.0'R100.0'R3.0'R10.0'R10.0'R10.0'R7.0'R8.0'R3.0'R3.0 'R3.0'R3. 0 ' R 3 6 . 0 ' R20 . 0 'R4.0'R4.0'R4 . 0 'R4.0'R 4 . 0 'R4.0'R8.0'R3.0'R 3 . 0 'ACCESSIBLE PARKINGSPACE, INCL.SIGNAGE, STRIPINGAND RAMPSM.D. BIT.PVMT., TYPPVMT.STRIPINGTYP.CONCRETE DRIVEWAYAPRON PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.REMOVE AND REPLACEEXISTING PAVEMENT ANDBASE MATERIAL TO MATCHEXISTING PAVEMENT SECTIONFOR UTILITY CONSTRUCTIONCONCRETE SIDEWALKPER CITY STANDARDS,TYP.B612 C&G, TYP.M.D. BIT.PVMT., TYPB612 C&G,TYP.B612 C&G,TYP.B612 C&G,TYP.PVMT. STRIPINGTYP.CONCRETE SIDEWALKPER CITY STANDARDS,TYP.CONCRETE DRIVEWAYAPRON PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.REMOVE AND REPLACEEXISTING PAVEMENT ANDBASE MATERIAL TO MATCHEXISTING PAVEMENT SECTIONFOR UTILITY CONSTRUCTION3' CURBTAPERMATCHEX. C&GMATCHMATCHMATCHMATCHB612 C&G,TYP.B612C&G,TYP.L.D. BIT.PVMT., TYPPVMT.STRIPINGTYP.CONC. WALK, TYPCONC. WALK, TYPCONC. WALK, TYPCONC. WALK, TYPBITUMINOUS PATH, TYPPICKLE BALL COURT,SEE ARCH'L PLANSFOR DETAILSWOOD DECK BRIDGE,SEE ARCH'L PLANSRETAINING WALLS, SEEGRADING PLAN FOR WALLELEVATIONS, SEE ARCH'LPLANS FOR DETAILSRETAINING WALLS, SEEGRADING PLAN FOR WALLELEVATIONS, SEE ARCH'LPLANS FOR DETAILSRETAINING WALLS, SEEGRADING PLAN FOR WALLELEVATIONS, SEE ARCH'LPLANS FOR DETAILSRETAINING WALLS, SEEGRADING PLAN FOR WALLELEVATIONS, SEE ARCH'LPLANS FOR DETAILSPLAZA DECK WITH RETAINING WALLS,SEE ARCH'L PLANS FOR DETAILSPLAZA DECK WITH RETAINING WALLS,SEE ARCH'L PLANS FOR DETAILSCONC. STAIRS,SEE ARCH'L PLANSFOR DETAILSCONC. STAIRS,SEE ARCH'L PLANSFOR DETAILSCONC. STAIRS,SEE ARCH'L PLANSFOR DETAILSCONC. STAIRS,SEE ARCH'L PLANSFOR DETAILSCONC. STAIRS,SEE ARCH'L PLANSFOR DETAILSCONC. WALK, TYPL.D. BIT.PVMT., TYPL.D. BIT.PVMT., TYPL.D. BIT.PVMT., TYPPLAZA DECK WITHRETAINING WALLS,SEE ARCH'L PLANSFOR DETAILSM.D. BIT.PVMT., TYPPATIO, SEE ARCH'LPLANS FOR DETAILSDOG RUN AREA,SEE ARCH'L PLANSFOR DETAILSSEE LANDSCAPINGPLAN, BY OTHERSCONC. STAIRS,SEE ARCH'L PLANSFOR DETAILSCONC. WALK, TYPCONC. PAVEMENT3' CURBTAPER3' CURBTAPERRIBBONCURB3' CURBTAPER22.0'MATCHEX. C&GMATCHEX. C&GMATCHEX. C&GMATCHEX. C&GMATCHACCESSIBLE ROUTEARROW. DO NOT PAINT,FOR CODE REVIEW ONLY,TYP.PERMEABLEPAVEMENTAREAS, TYP. SEEDETAIL.16.0' 12.2' 6.0'4.0' 16.0'11.5'8.0'44.0'5.7'18.0'TYP.22.0'4.7'8.0'24.0'5.7'9.0'TYP.22.0'18.0'TYP.4.7'20.0'TYP.9.0'TYP.22.0'18.0'TYP.4.7'20.0'TYP.2.9'5.0'29.8'6.0'14.8'18.0'TYP.24.0'8.3'18.0'TYP.24.0'10.1'18.0'TYP.24.0'8.9'18.0' 24.3'35.6'24.6'35.4'22.6'8.0'8.4'8.0'16.0'13.1'6.0'4.0'8.0'44.0'TOP=821.00EOF=820.80SITE 100-YR HWL=823.203:1 SIDE SLOPESMIN. BOTTOM AREA=5800 SF4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:21105............04/30/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/30/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.0SITE PLAN............SITE AREA TABLE:1.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNINGCONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES,EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINALLOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OFCONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TOOWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIORTO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING ARIGHT-OF-WAY AND STREET OPENING PERMIT.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TOINSTALLATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKE FORREVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS.5.LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS AREAPPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BYTHE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.6.CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETEFOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BYTHE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENTMATERIALS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS,BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNER RESERVES THERIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED.8.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCEWITH A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS-SEE DETAIL.9.CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TOTHE FLOW OF TRAFFIC. WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BEWHITE IN COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES.10.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND GUTTER TYPE. TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES-SEE DETAIL.11.ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.12.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TOSITE IMPROVEMENTS.13.FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS.14.PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.15.ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP.16.BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENTSECTIONS.17.ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THEDRIP LINE. SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS.18.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL"(651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THECONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NOCOST TO THE OWNER.SITE LAYOUT NOTES:SITE PLAN LEGEND:TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGSCITY OF EDINA SITE SPECIFIC NOTES:SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED.HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGNNP = NO PARKING FIRE LANEST = STOPCP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"N1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC NOTES.Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCONCRETE PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) ASSPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK) SEE GEOTECHNICALREPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & CONCRETEDEPTHS, SEE DETAIL.PROPERTY LINECURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUTGUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLANLIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE).SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE& WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DEATIL.MEDIUM DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE).SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE &WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DETAIL.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSTOSPECIALTY PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) - PROVIDE BIDFOR THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS, INCLUDE VARIATIONSOF BASE MATERIAL AND OTHER NECESSARYCOMPONENTS.1. STAMPED & COLORED CONCRETE2. CONCRETE PAVERSMAKERS, COLORS, MODELS, & PATTERN TO BEINCLUDED IN SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTAL PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.OPERATIONAL NOTES:SNOW REMOVAL:ALL SNOW SHALL BE STORED ON-SITE AT OUTSIDE EDGES OF PARKING LOT. WHEN THOSEAREAS ARE FULL, SNOW REMOVAL COMPANY WILL REMOVE TO OFFSITE LOCATIONTRASH REMOVAL:TRASH SHALL BE COLLECTED IN INTERIOR COLLECTION AREA AND STAGED OUTSIDE,WHERE DESIGNATED, ON DAY OF PICK-UP BY BUILDING PERSONNEL. PICK-UP SHALL BE BYCOMMERCIAL REFUSE AND RECYCLING HAULER COMPANY.DELIVERIES:DELIVERIES SHALL OCCUR AT THE MAIN ENTRANCE VIA STANDARD COMMERCIAL DELIVERYVEHICLES (UPS, FED EX, USPS). MOVE-IN/OUT OPERATIONS MAY BE STAGED AT OTHEREGRESS LOCATIONS WITH COORDINATION AND OPERATIONS ORGANIZED BY BUILDINGSTAFF, INCLUDING TRAFFIC CONTROL, AS REQUIRED.ACCESSIBILITY ARROW (IF APPLICABLE) DO NOTPAINT.PERVIOUS PAVEMENT - INCLUDE ALL BASE MATERIALAND APPURTENANCES AS SPECIFIED PERMANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS & INSTRUCTIONS.MAKE: T.B.D.MODEL: T.B.D.COLOR: T.B.D. - PROVIDE SAMPLES, SHOP DRAWINGS & PRODUCT DATA REQUIRED PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION. GUESTSUITEPUBCOWORK LOUNGE CONF.FITNESSWEIGHTROOMFITNESSYOGAGAME ROOMSAUNAPOOLCLUB ROOMRAMPDNMECH.326C TANDEM4 C19C587 STALLS57 C6RESIDENTIAL UNITSRESIDENTIAL UNITSRESIDENTIAL UNITS3CNOPARKING35' BUILDING SETBACK35' BUILDING SETBACK35' BUILDING SETBACK20' BUILDING SETBACKCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONST.LIMITS4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:21105............04/30/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/30/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC3.0GRADING PLAN............1.SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT & GENERAL GRADING NOTES.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SITEPREPARATION, SOIL CORRECTION, EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, ETC.) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTSOF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONSWITH THE SOILS ENGINEER.3.GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTIONDISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS & PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY.ALLEXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLREPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.4.PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW-LINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.5.GRADES OF WALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 5% MAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1% MIN. AND 2% MAX. CROSSSLOPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.6.PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. MAXIMUMSLOPES IN MAINTAINED AREAS IS 4:17.PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, FREESTANDING WALLS, OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES GREATER THAN 4' INHEIGHT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING WALL ENGINEER. DESIGNDRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATIONOF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AFINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOTOPSOIL AND SODDING ACTIVITIES.9.IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALL EXCESS SOILMATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO AN AREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THESITE.10.EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREASDESIGNATED ON THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR RESPREADING ON THESITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN EMBANKMENT AREAS, OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS,ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUT CUT AREAS, WHERE TURF IS TO BEESTABLISHED, TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TOA MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES.11.FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITSOF GRADING, INCLUDING ADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHINSPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARESHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADED SHALL BEPROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALL AREAS THATHAVE BECOME RUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALLAREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO EQUAL OR BETTER THANORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORK.12.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND/ORPARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSSWEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BECOMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICHSECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BECOMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. NO TEST ROLL SHALL OCCURWITHIN 10' OF ANY UNDERGROUND STORM RETENTION/DETENTION SYSTEMS.13. TOLERANCES13.1.THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.30 FOOTABOVE, OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE.13.2.THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHEREMEASUREMENT IS MADE.13.3.AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW THEREQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER.13.4.TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS.14.MAINTENANCE14.1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND EROSION, AND KEEP AREAFREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS.14.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED, ERODED AND RUTTED AREAS TOSPECIFIED TOLERANCES. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED, AND DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD,ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED SHALL BE RESEEDED AND MULCHED.14.3.WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONSOR ADVERSE WEATHER, CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE, AND COMPACT TO REQUIREDDENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION.GENERAL GRADING NOTES:1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALGRADING PLAN LEGEND:SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTERSPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURBSPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRSGROUNDWATER INFORMATION:CITY OF EDINA GRADING NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC GRADING NOTES.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5EROSION CONTROL NOTES:01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallREX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINEUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)CURB AND GUTTER (T.O = TIP OUT)EMERGENCY OVERFLOWEOF=1135.52TOPER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY XXXXX, INC., DATED XX-XX-XX GROUNDWATER WASOBSERVED AT ELEVATIONS RANGING FROM XXX.XX TO XXX.XXTHE BORINGS & GROUNDWATER ARE AS FOLLOWS:SB-1XXX.XXSB-2XXX.XXSB-3XXX.XXSB-4XXX.XXPROPOSED FOOTING DRAIN TILE INVERT ELEVATION = XXX.XXSPOT GRADE ELEVATION MATCH EXISTINGGRADE BREAK - HIGH POINTS GUESTSUITEPUBCOWORK LOUNGE CONF.FITNESSWEIGHTROOMFITNESSYOGAGAME ROOMSAUNAPOOLCLUB ROOMRAMPDNMECH.326C TANDEM4 C19C587 STALLS57 C6RESIDENTIAL UNITSRESIDENTIAL UNITSRESIDENTIAL UNITS3CNOPARKING35' BUILDING SETBACK35' BUILDING SETBACK35' BUILDING SETBACK20' BUILDING SETBACKCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONST.LIMITSSTUB 8" SANITARY TO5' FROM BUILDINGIE @ STUB=813.15COORD. W/ MECH'L82 LF 8" PVC SDR 26SANITARY SERVICE@ 2.00%MAKE CONNECTION TO EXISTING12" TRUSS SANITARY SEWEREX IE (E/W)=811.51(FIELD VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION)PROP IE (N)=811.51COORD. W/ CITYSTUB 8" COMBINED DIP WATERSERVICE AND VALVE, STUB TOWITHIN 5' FROM BUILDING,COORD. W/ MECH'LPROPOSED GATEVALVE & VALVE BOXMAKE WET TAP CONNECTION TOEXISTING 8" CIP WATER MAIN,(FIELD VERIFY LOCATION PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION)COORD. W/ CITYEXISTINGHYDRANTHYD &GV, TYP.HYD &GV, TYP.MAKE WET TAP CONNECTION TOEXISTING 8" CIP WATER MAIN,(FIELD VERIFY LOCATION PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION)COORD. W/ CITY8" DIPWATERMAIN10" DIP WATERMAIN8" DIPWATERMAIN10"X6"TEE45° BEND8"X6" TEEMAKE CONNECTIONTO EX. 8" DIP(FIELD VERIFY SIZEAND LOCATION)45° BENDPROPOSED GATEVALVE & VALVE BOX10"X8"TEE10" TO 8"REDUCER10"PLUGPROP. FDC LOCATIONRAINWATER REUSE/IRRIGATION CISTERN(2) 65 LF ROWS OF 60" DUAL WALL PP PIPEW/ STONE SEPARATION, TOP, ENDS & SIDESPER MANUFACTURER'S SHOP DRAWINGMIN. STORAGE VOLUME (BELOWOVERFLOW) REQUIRED=2,500 CFCISTERN IE=812.9015" OVERFLOW IE=817.90FLOOD STORAGE BASIN, SEE GRADINGPLAN.12" FES 8IE=819.00INSTALL RIP RAP PER MNDOT SPEC155 LF 12" HDPE @ 0.00%IE=819.0012" FES 7IE=818.00INSTALL RIP RAP PER MNDOT SPEC33 LF 12" HDPE @ 1.00%OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE 5RE=822.00IE(S/N)=818.30CONSTRUCT WEIR WALL IN MHTOP OF WEIR WALL=820.00STMH 6RE=822.00IE(S/N)=818.30IE (E)=819.006 LF 12" HDPE @ 0.00%IE=818.30UNDERGROUND POND 2PFOOTPRINT=202' X 17'1 ROW OF 202 LF 29"T X 42" WPERFORATED CMP ARCH PIPE6" STONE BASE AND TOP12" STONE ENDS6'-9" STONE SIDESSTONE BASE IE=817.80CMP IE=818.30CMP TOP=820.72STONE TOP=821.22SEE DETAIL100-YR HWL=820.46NWL=820.00UNDERGROUND POND 1PTWO CONNECTING SECTIONS OF 48" PERF. CMPSECTION A FOOTPRINT=140' X 30'SECTION B FOOTPRINT=102' X 30'INCLUDING 12" STONE SIDES AND ENDS6" STONE BASE AND TOPSTONE BASE IE=816.00CMP IE=816.50CMP TOP=820.50STONE TOP=821.00100-YR HWL=822.29NWL=818.00SEE DETAILOUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE 2RE=823.00IE(E/W)=816.50CONSTRUCT WEIR WALL IN MHTOP OF WEIR WALL=818.503" ORIFICE IN WEIR WALL, IE=818.0061 LF 24" HDP @ 0.00%IE=816.50STMH 1RE=821.40±IE=815.818 LF 15" HDPE @ 0.00%IE=816.5073 LF 15" HDPE @ 0.94%EX. MHRIM=820.30EX IE (S)=815.30(FIELD VERIFY)PR IE (NE)=815.50CORE DRILL NEWCONNECTION TOEXISTING MHCOORD. RELOCATIONOF EXISTINGELECTRIC MH WITHUTILITY OWNER33 LF 15" HDPE @ 0.94%CBMH 3RE=821.33IE=817.4112" INLETIE=816.5091 LF 12" HDPE @ 1.00%69 LF 12" HDPE @ 1.00%CB 4RE=821.98±IE=818.1061 LF 24" HDP @ 0.00%IE=816.50STUB 10" STORM TO 5' FROM BUILDING,COORD. W/ MECH'LSTUB IE=819.14STUB 10" STORM TO 5' FROM BUILDING,COORD. W/ MECH'LSTUB IE=819.147 LF 10" PVC SCH. 40 @ 2.00%10" BUILDING STORMDRAIN INLETIE=819.00, TYP.823.24 SURFACE INLET CBSTMH 9RE=825.00IE=816.8115" INLETIE=816.5062 LF 15" HDPE @ 0.50%182 LF 15" HDPE @ 0.50%CISTERN OVERFLOW OUTLETIE=817.90±CISTERN PUMP HOUSE FOR IRRIGATION &REUSERAINWATER FILTER MHSTUB 12" STORM SEWER TO 5' FROM BLDG,COORD. W/ MECH'LSTUB IE=816.50INLET IE=816.304931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:21105............04/30/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/30/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC4.0UTILITY PLAN............GENERAL UTILITY NOTES:UTILITY LEGEND:CITY OF EDINA UTILITY NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC UTILITY NOTES.01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCATCH BASINGATE VALVE AND VALVE BOXSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATER MAINPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTMANHOLEFES AND RIP RAP1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIESAND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLIMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THEPLANS.3. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHERSTATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURSPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANYUTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.4. UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARDSPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION" AND "SANITARYSEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERSASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), AND SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTSOF THE CITY AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.5. CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE-USED ORPLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER.6. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) AWWA C151, ASME B16.4,AWWA C110, AWWA C153 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) ASTM D3034 & F679,OR SCH 40 ASTM D1785, 2665, ASTM F794, 1866) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.8. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE ASTM F714 & F2306 WITH ASTM D3212 SPECFITTINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.9. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OFFLARED END SECTION.10. UTILITIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THECONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDINGLINES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS.11. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALLCATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIMELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS.12. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.13. HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITYREQUIREMENTS. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL.14. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18"VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTHWATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL.15. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTALSEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.16. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITYSTANDARDS AND COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.17.CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE CORE-DRILLED.18. COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICALDRAWINGS.19. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIESWITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF.20. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTSOF THE CITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFICCONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHEDPER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROLDEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TOSIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETSSHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTEDWITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY.21. ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADESWHERE REQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH.STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTSFOR TRAFFIC LOADING.22. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES.23. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES.COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOTIMPACT INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES.24. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION ANDSUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK.25.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT ORWATERTIGHT. APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKEWATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES.26.ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THEBUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN RULES,CHAPTER 4714, SECTION 1109.0.27.FOR ALL SITES LOCATED IN CLAY SOIL AREAS, DRAIN TILE MUST BE INSTALLED AT ALLLOW POINT CATCH BASINS 25' IN EACH DIRECTION. SEE PLAN AND DETAIL. INSTALL LOWPOINT DRAIN TILE PER PLANS AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS ANDREQUIREMENTS. 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:21105............04/30/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/30/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC5.0CIVIL DETAILS............6"8"12"13 1/2" 6"1/2" RADIUSFINISHED GRADE3" RADIUS CORNERS1:3 BATTER SLOPE GUTTER3/4"/1'NOTES:1. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT10'-0" O.C. +/-2. BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPONSOIL CONDITIONSCLASS V AGGREGATE SUBBASE-SEEBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DETAIL (6" MIN.)FINISHED GRADE0.5% SLOPE-CONSTRUCT WITH REVERSE SLOPEGUTTER (T.O. GUTTER) WHERE THE PAVEMENT SLOPESAWAY FROM CURB. SEE PLANN T SB-612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER7"37"20"FINISHED GRADESLOPE GUTTER 3/4"/1'NOTES:1. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT 10'-0" O.C. +/-2. BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPON SOIL CONDITIONSCONTINUOUS SLOPE CONCRETE CURBAND GUTTERPAVEMENT MATERIALSSEE DETAIL6"6"RIBBON CURBN T S4EXTEND POST PAST TOP OF POST10 DEGREE SLOPE1 INCH SILICONE RUBBEROR ASPHALTIC CAULKINGCOMPOUNDFILL ANNULAR SPACE TO 1 INCHFROM TOP WITH SILICA SANDCONCRETE FOOTING AS SPECIFIED6"3'-6"2'-6" 60"-66" FROM PAVEMENT TO BOTTOM OF SIGN 1/2"MATERIAL VARIES-SEE PLANMETAL SIGN ACCORDINGTO MN STATE CODENOTE:1. SIGN SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED.2. VERIFY POST PAINT C0LOR WITH LANDSCAPEARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.ACCESSIBLE SIGN AND POSTN T S1'-6"6" O.D. GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE PAINTED WITH 1COAT OF APPROPRIATE PRIMER AND TWO COATSSIGN ENAMEL. FILL ANNULAR SPACE WITH GROUT.COVER WITH YELLOW "IDEAL SHIELD" PLASTICCOVER.GREEN POWDER COATED STEEL SQUAREPOST AS SPECIFIED1/4" METAL PLATE WELDED TOBOTTOM OF 6” PIPEGALVANIZED STEEL FASTENER(TYP. OF 2)6MEDIUM-DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT8" CLASS 5 AGGREGATESUBBASE (MNDOT 3138)2.0" BASE COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPNWB330B)TACK COAT (MNDOT 2357)1.5" WEAR COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPWEA340B)COMPACTED SUBGRADE (100% OF STANDARDPROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY)N T S1NOTE:SECTION IS FORBIDDING PURPOSESONLY. REFER TOGEOTECH FORFINAL PAVEMENTSECTION.LIGHT-DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATESUBBASE (MNDOT 3138)1.5" BASE COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPNWB330B)TACK COAT (MNDOT 2357)1.5" WEAR COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPWEA340B)COMPACTED SUBGRADE (100% OF STANDARDPROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY)N T SNOTE:SECTION IS FORBIDDING PURPOSESONLY. REFER TOGEOTECH FORFINAL PAVEMENTSECTION.2UNREINFORCED CONCRETE PAVEMENTN T SNOTES:1. SEE GEO-TECHNICALREPORT FOR BASERECOMMENDATIONS.2. INSTALLATION SHALLBE IN ACCORDANCE TO ACERTIFIED, ON-SITEM.A.P.A. TECHNICIAN ASSPECIFIED.6" UNREINFORCED CONCRETEPAVEMENT (MNDOT 2461)6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE SUBBASE(MNDOT 3138)COMPACTED SUBGRADE (100% OFSTANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRYDENSITY)5 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:21105............04/30/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/30/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC5.1CIVIL DETAILS............ 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:21105............04/30/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/30/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC5.2CIVIL DETAILS............PERMEABLE PAVEMENT - #1 (1P)N T SNOTES:1. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.2. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS.3. A SUBGRADE CONSISTING OF GRADED AGGREGATES MAY BE REQUIRED WHEN SUBGRADE CONDITIONS ARE POOR.1.5"6"3/4" - 2"ANGULARWASHEDSTONERETENTION PIPINGASTM NO. 8 STONESETTING BED ANDIN-FILLPERMEABLE PAVEMENT- COORD. WITH OWNER,SEE MANUFACTURERSPECIFICATIONS18" 29"6"818.00 GWB612 CURB& GUTTERLIGHT DUTYPAVEMENTCOMPACTED SUBGRADE821.771OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTUREN T SWEIR PLATEGEOTEXTILE, TYPICAL TOWRAP AROUND FILTERMATERIALNATIVE MATERIALCOMPACTED PERGEOTECHNICAL REPORT,TYPICAL48"Ø CMP0.75"-2" STONEELEV=MH RIMSEE UTILITY PLANOUTLETELEV=SEE PLANELEV=SEE PLAN (TOP WEIRWALL)SUBGRADE SOILS(IN-SITU SAND)2148" 6" MIN.6" MIN.KEY1. TOPSOIL2. FREE DRAINING ANGULAR WASHED STONE 3/4" - 2" PARTICLE SIZE (NON LIMESTONE MATERIAL THAT CONTAINS LESS THAN 5% DELETERIOUS MATERIALS). INSTALL TO MIN. 95% STANDARD DENSITY PER AASHTO T99.FABRIC WRAP TOP ANDSIDES WITHCONTECH C-40NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILESECTION DETAILNTS1.INSTALL SILT FENCE AND/OR OR OTHER APPROPRIATE TEMPORARY EROSIONCONTROL DEVICES TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING OR ENTERING THEPRACTICE DURING CONSTRUCTION.2.ALL DOWN-GRADIENT PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S MUST BE INPLACE BEFORE ANY UP GRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY BEGINS.3.PERFORM CONTINUOUS INSPECTIONS OF EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES.4.INSTALL UTILITIES (WATER, SANITARY SEWER, ELECTRIC, PHONE, FIBER OPTIC,ETC) PRIOR TO SETTING FINAL GRADE OF BIORETENTION DEVICE.5.PERFORM ALL OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENTS.6.SEED AND MULCH ALL AREAS AFTER DISTURBANCE.7.CONSTRUCT RETENTION DEVICE UPON STABILIZATION OF CONTRIBUTINGDRAINAGE AREA.8.IMPLEMENT TEMPORARY AND PERMENATE EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES.9.PLANT AND MULCH SITE.10.REMOVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AFTER THE CONTRIBUTINGDRAINAGE AREA IS ADEQUATELY VEGETATED.GENERAL NOTES1.IN THE EVENT THAT SEDIMENT IS INTRODUCED INTO THE BMP DURING ORIMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EXCAVATION, THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVEDFROM THE PRACTICE PRIOR TO CONTINUING CONSTRUCTION.2.GRADING OF RETENTION DEVICES SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED USINGLOW-COMPACTION EARTH-MOVING EQUIPMENT TO PREVENT COMPACTION OFUNDERLYING SOILS.3.ALL SUB MATERIALS BELOW THE SPECIFIED RETENTION DEPTH (ELEVATION)SHALL BE UNDISTURBED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCINGGRADEPAVEMENT/LANDSCAPING / SOD12"(TYP)24"PERFORATEDCMP PIPEUNDERGROUND RETENTION SYSTEM (4P)N T S12"(TYP321P2P 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:21105............04/30/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/30/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC5.3CIVIL DETAILS............ CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONST.LIMITSINLET PROTECTION ATCATCH BASINS BEINGREMOVEDCONSTRUCTIONENTRANCECONSTRUCTIONENTRANCEPLACE EROSIONCONTROL BLANKETON ALL SLOPES 4:1 ORSTEEPER, TYP.(MNDOT CATEGORY 3)CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEINLET PROTECTION AT ALLDOWNSTREAM CATCH BASINS.PLACE EROSION CONTROLBLANKET ON ALL SLOPES4:1 OR STEEPER, TYP.(MNDOT CATEGORY 3)4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:21105............04/30/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/30/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.0SWPPP - EXISTINGCONDITIONS............01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"N1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES.CITY OF EDINA EROSION CONTROL NOTES:1. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL REQUIRE ANMPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAININGANY EROSION CONTROL PERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.2. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES,DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES.3. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSIONCONTROL NOTES.4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION,INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT.SWPPP NOTES:Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRLEGEND:EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALINLET PROTECTIONSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEDRAINAGE ARROW1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMITEROSION CONTROL BLANKETALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, ANDMEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUMREQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURINGTHE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. GUESTSUITEPUBCOWORK LOUNGE CONF.FITNESSWEIGHTROOMFITNESSYOGAGAME ROOMSAUNAPOOLCLUB ROOMRAMPDNMECH.326C TANDEM4 C19C587 STALLS57 C6RESIDENTIAL UNITSRESIDENTIAL UNITSRESIDENTIAL UNITS3CNOPARKING35' BUILDING SETBACK35' BUILDING SETBACK35' BUILDING SETBACK20' BUILDING SETBACKCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONST.LIMITSCONSTRUCTIONENTRANCECONSTRUCTIONENTRANCEINLET PROTECTION ATCATCH BASINS, TYPPLACE EROSIONCONTROL BLANKETON ALL SLOPES 4:1 ORSTEEPER, TYP.(MNDOT CATEGORY 3)CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEINLET PROTECTION AT ALLDOWNSTREAM CATCH BASINS.PLACE EROSION CONTROLBLANKET ON ALL SLOPES4:1 OR STEEPER, TYP.(MNDOT CATEGORY 3)4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:21105............04/30/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/30/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.1SWPPP - PROPOSEDCONDITIONS............01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRLEGEND:EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALINLET PROTECTIONSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEDRAINAGE ARROW1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMITEROSION CONTROL BLANKET1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES.CITY OF EDINA EROSION CONTROL NOTES:1. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL REQUIRE ANMPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAININGANY EROSION CONTROL PERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.2. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES,DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES.3. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSIONCONTROL NOTES.4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION,INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT.SWPPP NOTES:ALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, ANDMEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUMREQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURINGTHE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:21105............04/30/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/30/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.2SWPPP - DETAILS............OVERFLOW AT TOP OFFILTER ASSEMBLYOVERFLOW IS 12 OF THE CURBBOX HEIGHTHIGH-FLOW FABRICFILTER ASSEMBLY DIAMETER, 6"ON-GRADE 10" AT LOW POINTEXISTING CURB, PLATE, BOX,AND GRATENOTES:1. REPLACE INLET GRATE UPON COMPLETE INSTALLATION OF INLET PROTECTION FABRIC.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS FROM THE SURFACE OF THE SYSTEMAFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND AT THE COMPLETION OF THE CONTRACT.3. REFERENCE APPLE VALLEY STANDARD PLATE ERO-4C.CURB INLET FILTERN T S1PROFILE6" MIN CRUSHED STONE75' MINIMUMPLANFINISHEDGRADETO CONSTRUCTION AREA35' REXISTINGUNDISTURBEDROADWAYN T S30' FROM EDGE OF ROADTO FRONT OF SPEED BUMPGEOTEXTILE FILTERFABRIC4" HIGH, 18" WIDESPEED BUMPSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ACCESS24' (MIN)NOTES:1.PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND UNDISTURBEDROADWAY.2.THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENTONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE OR ADDINGSTONE TO THE LENGTH OF THE ENTRANCE.3.REPAIR AND CLEANOUT MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT.4.ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY SHALL BE REMOVED ASDIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.5.FINAL LOCATION AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.6.CRUSHED STONE SHALL BE 1-1/2" DIA. CLOSE GRADED, AND IN ACCORDANCE TO MNDOT SECTION 2118.EXISTING UNDISTURBED ROADWAY35' RTO CONSTRUCTIONAREA2TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL.SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES,10" SPACING, 4" DOWN FROMTRENCHOVERLAP: BURY UPPER ENDOF LOWER STRIP AS IN 'A'AND 'B'. OVERLAP END OFTOP STRIP 4" AND STAPLE.EROSION STOP: FOLD OF MATTINGBURIED IN SILT TRENCH ANDTAMPED. DOUBLEROW OFSTAPLES.PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APARTTO KEEP MATTING FIRMLYPRESSED TO SOIL.'D''C''B'BURY THE TOP END OF THEMATTING IN A TRENCH 4" ORMORE IN DEPTHTYPICAL STAPLE #8GAUGE WIRE1 1/2"10"OVERFALL'E''A'NOTE:1. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TOKEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TOSOIL.EROSION BLANKETN T S3FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIEDEXISTING GROUNDSURFACEDIRECTION OF FLOWWOODEN STAKES 1/2"X2"X16" MIN. PLACED 10' O.C.WHEN INSTALLED ON GROUND. IF INSTALLED ONPVMT. PROVIDE SANDBAGS BEHIND AND ON TOP ATMIN. 10' O.C.8" MIN.SEDIMENT BIO-ROLL / COMPOST FILTER LOGN T SFILLER AS SPECIFIEDNOTE:1. COMPOST FILTER LOGS (BIO ROLLS) SHALL BE FILTREXX EROSION CONTROL SOXX OR APPROVED EQUAL.2. COMPOST FILLER TO BE MADE FROM A COMPOST BLEND 30%-40% GRADE 2 (SPEC 3890) AND 60%-70%PARTIALLY DECOMPOSED WOOD CHIPS, PER MNDOT SPEC 3897.3. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE GEOTEXTILE KNITTED MATERIAL WITH MAX. OPENINGS OF 3/8".4. IF MULTIPLE ROLLS NEEDED, OVERLAP BY MIN. 12" AT ENDS AND STAKE.5. SILT SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE IT REACHES 80% OF THE HEIGHT OF THE ROLL OR AS DEEMED NECESSARYBY SITE CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN PROPER FUNCTION.FILL UPSTREAM BASE EDGE WITH2" OF DIRT OR COMPOST TOEMBED ROLL.4FILTER FABRIC WITH WIRE SUPPORT NETAS SPECIFIED.METAL POST ASSPECIFIED.FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED SECURETO WIRE SUPPORT NET WITH METALCLIPS 12"O.C.SUPPORT NET: 12 GAUGE 4" x 4"WIRE HOOKED ONTOPREFORMED CHANNELS ONPOSTS AS SPECIFIED.EXISTING GROUNDSURFACECARRY WIRE SUPPORT NETDOWN INTO TRENCHDIRECTION OF FLOWANCHOR FABRIC WITHSOIL, TAMP BACKFILLMETAL POSTS 8'-0" O.C.MAX.24" 24" 24" MIN. 6"6"SEDIMENT FENCEN T S5 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:21105............04/30/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/30/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.3SWPPP - NARRATIVE............OWNER:SOLHEM COMPANIES724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONTACT:CURT GUNSBURY612-598-9416OWNER INFORMATIONTRAINING SECTION 21PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PERMANENTSTORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMPERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IS NOT REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT TO MEET NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. THEPROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPOSED STORMWATER SYSTEM.AREAS AND QUANTITIES:SWPPP CONTACT PERSONCONTRACTOR:SWPPP INSPECTOR TRAINING:ALL SWPPP INSPECTIONS MUST BE PERFORMED BY APERSON THAT MEETS THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THENPDES CONSTRUCTION SITE PERMIT.TRAINING CREDENTIALS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THECONTRACTOR AND KEPT ON SITE WITH THE SWPPPNOTE: QUANTITIES ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE FOR THEMSELVES THE EXACTQUANTITIES FOR BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION.PROJECT NARRATIVE:PROJECT IS A REDEVELOPMENT OF AN EXISTING GAS STATION BUILDING INTO TWO NEW COMMERCIAL RESTAURANT BUILDINGS. SITE ANDLANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WILL OCCUR.NATIVE BUFFER NARRATIVE:PRESERVING A 50' NATURAL BUFFER AROUND WATER BODIES IS NOT REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT BECAUSE WATER BODIES ARE NOTLOCATED ON SITE.INFILTRATION NARRATIVE:INFILTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED AS PART OF THE PROJECT BECAUSE PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT IS NOT REQUIRED.SOIL CONTAMINATION NARRATIVE:SOILS ONSITE HAVE NOT BEEN IDENTIFIED AS CONTAMINATED. AN MPCA SOILS ASSESSMENT WAS COMPLETED AND IT WAS DETERMINED THATTHIS SITE IS APPROPRIATE FOR INFILTRATION.SPECIAL TMDL BMP REQUIREMENTS SITE SPECIFIC (IF REQUIRED):THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN ONE MILE AND DISCHARGES TO BOTH EDINA LAKE AND NINEMILE CREEK - THEY ARE IDENTIFIED AS IMPAIRED WATERBODIES PER THE MPCA'S 303(D) IMPAIRED WATERS LIST. EDINA LAKE IS IMPAIRED FOR NUTRIENTS AND NINEMILE CREEK IS IMPAIRED FORBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE BIOASSESSMENTS; FISHES BIOASSESSMENTS. BECAUSE THESE WATERS ARE LOCATED WITHIN ONE MILE OF THESITE, BMPS AS DEFINED IN THE NPDES PERMIT ITEMS 23.9 AND 23.10 APPLY. THESE ARE AS FOLLOWS:1.DURING CONSTRUCTION:A.STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION BUT IN NO CASE COMPLETEDLATER THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLYCEASED.B.TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 14. MUST BE USED FOR COMMON DRAINAGE LOCATIONS THATSERVE AN AREA WITH FIVE (5) OR MORE ACRES DISTURBED AT ONE TIME.PERMANENT STABILIZATION NOTES SITE SPECIFIC:PERMANENT SEED MIX·FOR THIS PROJECT ALL AREAS THAT ARE NOT TO BE SODDED OR LANDSCAPED SHALL RECEIVE A NATIVE PERMANENT SEED MIX.··AREAS IN BUFFERS AND ADJACENT TO OR IN WET AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 (STORMWATER SOUTH AND WEST) AT 35 LBS PERACRE.··DRY AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 35-221 (DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL) AT 40 LBS PER ACRE.·MAINTENANCE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL.SUPPLEMENTARY SITE SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES:THESE NOTES SUPERCEDE ANY GENERAL SWPPP NOTES.THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN 1.0 ACRES SO AN NPDES PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. THECONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES IN THE NPDES PERMIT THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION.SWPPP ATTACHMENTS (ONLY APPLICABLE IF SITE IS 1 ACRE OR GREATER):CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE FOLLOWING SWPPP ATTACHMENTS WHICH ARE A PART OF THE OVERALL SWPPP PACKAGE:ATTACHMENT A. CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE - SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENTATTACHMENT B. CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLISTATTACHMENT C. MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMSATTACHMENT D: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.ATTACHMENT E: GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.THE CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH A CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT DISTURBS SITE SOIL OR WHO IMPLEMENT A POLLUTANT CONTROL MEASURE IDENTIFIED IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTIONPREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT (DATED AUGUST 1, 2018 # MNR100001) AND ANY LOCALGOVERNING AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION CONCERNING EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL.STORMWATER DISCHARGE DESIGN REQUIREMENTSSWPPPTHE NATURE OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IS REPRESENTED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. SEE THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS AND SWPPP NARRATIVE (ATTACHMENT A:CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE) FOR ADDITIONAL SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP INFORMATION. THE PLANS SHOW LOCATIONS AND TYPES OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLBMP'S. STANDARD DETAILS ARE ATTACHED TO THIS SWPPP DOCUMENT.THE INTENDED SEQUENCING OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IS AS FOLLOWS:1. INSTALL STABILIZED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE2. INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE AROUND SITE3. INSTALL ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING AROUND INFILTRATION AREAS4. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT ALL ADJACENT AND DOWNSTREAM CATCH BASINS5. CLEAR AND GRUB FOR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND INSTALL6. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND (SECTION 14)7. CLEAR AND GRUB REMAINDER OF SITE8. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL9. ROUGH GRADING OF SITE10. STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS AND STOCKPILES11. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN STORM SEWER AND SERVICES12. INSTALL SILT FENCE / INLET PROTECTION AROUND CB'S13. INSTALL STREET SECTION14. INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER15. BITUMINOUS ON STREETS16. FINAL GRADE BOULEVARD, INSTALL SEED AND MULCH17. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM BASIN / POND18. FINAL GRADE POND / INFILTRATION BASINS (DO NOT COMPACT SOILS IN INFILTRATION AREAS.)19. WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED BY EITHER SEED OR SOD/LANDSCAPING, REMOVE SILT FENCE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL.RECORDS RETENTION:THE SWPPP (ORIGINAL OR COPIES) INCLUDING, ALL CHANGES TO IT, AND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION BY THE PERMITTEE WHO HAS OPERATIONALCONTROL OF THAT PORTION OF THE SITE. THE SWPPP CAN BE KEPT IN EITHER THE FIELD OFFICE OR IN AN ON SITE VEHICLE DURING NORMAL WORKING HOURS.ALL OWNER(S) MUST KEEP THE SWPPP, ALONG WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL RECORDS, ON FILE FOR THREE (3) YEARS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT AS OUTLINED IN SECTION 4. THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE ANYRECORDS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT.1.THE FINAL SWPPP;2.ANY OTHER STORMWATER RELATED PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT;3.RECORDS OF ALL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION (SEE SECTION 11, INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE);4.ALL PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED, INCLUDING ALL RIGHT OF WAY, CONTRACTS, COVENANTS AND OTHER BINDING REQUIREMENTS REGARDING PERPETUALMAINTENANCE; AND5.ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGN OF THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS.SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBILITIES:1.THE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ARE PERMITTEE(S) AS IDENTIFIED BY THE NPDES PERMIT.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ON-SITE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE ACTIVITIES OF ALL OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SUBCONTRACTORS.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A PERSON(S) KNOWLEDGEABLE AND EXPERIENCED IN THE APPLICATION OF EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO OVERSEE ALL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OFBMPS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PERSON(S) MEETING THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT TO CONDUCT INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS INACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT. ONE OF THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR AN ONSITE INSPECTION WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST BY MPCA. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDETRAINING DOCUMENTATION FOR THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) AS REQUIRED BY THE NPDES PERMIT. THIS TRAINING DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE RECORDED IN OR WITH THE SWPPP BEFORE THE START OF CONSTRUCTION ORAS SOON AS THE PERSONNEL FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN DETERMINED. DOCUMENTATION SHALL INCLUDE:4.1.NAMES OF THE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE TRAINED PER SECTION 21 OF THE PERMIT.4.2.DATES OF TRAINING AND NAME OF INSTRUCTOR AND ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING.4.3.CONTENT OF TRAINING COURSE OR WORKSHOP INCLUDING THE NUMBER OF HOURS OF TRAINING.5.FOLLOWING FINAL STABILIZATION AND THE TERMINATION OF COVERAGE FOR THE NPDES PERMIT, THE OWNER IS EXPECTED TO FURNISH LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (O & M) OF THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTSSWPPP AMENDMENTS (SECTION 6):1.ONE OF THE INDIVIDUALS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 21.2.A OR ITEM 21.2.B OR ANOTHER QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL MUST COMPLETE ALL SWPPP CHANGES. CHANGES INVOLVING THE USE OF A LESS STRINGENT BMP MUSTINCLUDE A JUSTIFICATION DESCRIBING HOW THE REPLACEMENT BMP IS EFFECTIVE FOR THE SITE CHARACTERISTICS.2.PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN,CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, WEATHER OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS HAVING A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER.3.PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER INSPECTIONS OR INVESTIGATIONS BYTHE SITE OWNER OR OPERATOR, USEPA OR MPCA OFFICIALS INDICATE THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE IN ELIMINATING OR SIGNIFICANTLY MINIMIZING THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS ORGROUNDWATER OR THE DISCHARGES ARE CAUSING WATER QUALITY STANDARD EXCEEDANCES (E.G., NUISANCE CONDITIONS AS DEFINED IN MINN. R. 7050.0210, SUBP. 2) OR THE SWPPP IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THEOBJECTIVES OF A USEPA APPROVED TMDL.BMP SELECTION AND INSTALLATION (SECTION 7):1.PERMITTEES MUST SELECT, INSTALL, AND MAINTAIN THE BMPS IDENTIFIED IN THE SWPPP AND IN THIS PERMIT IN AN APPROPRIATE AND FUNCTIONAL MANNER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH RELEVANT MANUFACTURERSPECIFICATIONS AND ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES.EROSION PREVENTION (SECTION 8):1.BEFORE WORK BEGINS, PERMITTEES MUST DELINEATE THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED.2.PERMITTEES MUST MINIMIZE THE NEED FOR DISTURBANCE OF PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT WITH STEEP SLOPES. WHEN STEEP SLOPES MUST BE DISTURBED, PERMITTEES MUST USE TECHNIQUES SUCH AS PHASINGAND STABILIZATION PRACTICES DESIGNED FOR STEEP SLOPES (E.G., SLOPE DRAINING AND TERRACING).3.PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS, INCLUDING STOCKPILES. STABILIZATION MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION WHEN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY ORTEMPORARILY CEASED ON ANY PORTION OF THE SITE AND WILL NOT RESUME FOR A PERIOD EXCEEDING 14 CALENDAR DAYS. STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THECONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ON CONSTRUCTED BASE COMPONENTS OF ROADS, PARKING LOTS AND SIMILAR SURFACES. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ON TEMPORARYSTOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT SILT, CLAY OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS (E.G., CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCKPILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES) BUT PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE SEDIMENTCONTROLS AT THE BASE OF THE STOCKPILE.4.FOR PUBLIC WATERS THAT THE MINNESOTA DNR HAS PROMULGATED "WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS" DURING SPECIFIED FISH SPAWNING TIME FRAMES, PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSEDSOIL AREAS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE WATER'S EDGE, AND THAT DRAIN TO THESE WATERS, WITHIN 24 HOURS DURING THE RESTRICTION PERIOD.5.PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF THE LAST 200 LINEAR FEET OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES OR SWALES THAT DRAIN WATER FROM THE SITE WITHIN 24 HOURSAFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER OR PROPERTY EDGE. PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF REMAINING PORTIONS OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES WITHIN 14 CALENDARDAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER OR PROPERTY EDGE AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASES.6.TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM DURING CONSTRUCTION (WITH PROPERLY DESIGNED ROCK-DITCH CHECKS, BIO ROLLS, SILT DIKES, ETC.) DO NOTNEED TO BE STABILIZED. PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE THESE AREAS WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER THEIR USE AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM CEASES7.PERMITTEES MUST NOT USE MULCH, HYDROMULCH, TACKIFIER, POLYACRYLAMIDE OR SIMILAR EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES WITHIN ANY PORTION OF THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF A TEMPORARY ORPERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE SECTION WITH A CONTINUOUS SLOPE OF GREATER THAN 2 PERCENT.8.PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION AT ALL PIPE OUTLETS WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER OR PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENTSYSTEM.9.PERMITTEES MUST NOT DISTURB MORE LAND (I.E., PHASING) THAN CAN BE EFFECTIVELY INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 11.SEDIMENT CONTROL (SECTION 9):1.PERMITTEES MUST ESTABLISH SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS ON ALL DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETERS OF THE SITE AND DOWNGRADIENT AREAS OF THE SITE THAT DRAIN TO ANY SURFACE WATER, INCLUDING CURB ANDGUTTER SYSTEMS. PERMITTEES MUST LOCATE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES UPGRADIENT OF ANY BUFFER ZONES. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENTLAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN AND MUST KEEP THE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES IN PLACE UNTIL THEY ESTABLISH PERMANENT COVER.2.IF DOWNGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE OVERLOADED, BASED ON FREQUENT FAILURE OR EXCESSIVE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL ADDITIONAL UPGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROLPRACTICES OR REDUNDANT BMPS TO ELIMINATE THE OVERLOADING AND AMEND THE SWPPP TO IDENTIFY THESE ADDITIONAL PRACTICES AS REQUIRED IN ITEM 6.3.3.TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES AND SEDIMENT BASINS DESIGNED AS PART OF A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM (E.G., DITCHES WITH ROCK-CHECK DAMS) REQUIRE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICESONLY AS APPROPRIATE FOR SITE CONDITIONS.4.A FLOATING SILT CURTAIN PLACED IN THE WATER IS NOT A SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP TO SATISFY ITEM 9.2 EXCEPT WHEN WORKING ON A SHORELINE OR BELOW THE WATERLINE. IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SHORT TERMCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (E.G., INSTALLATION OF RIP RAP ALONG THE SHORELINE) IN THAT AREA IS COMPLETE, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL AN UPLAND PERIMETER CONTROL PRACTICE IF EXPOSED SOILS STILL DRAINTO A SURFACE WATER.5.PERMITTEES MUST RE-INSTALL ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ADJUSTED OR REMOVED TO ACCOMMODATE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITIES SUCH AS CLEARING OR GRUBBING, OR PASSAGE OF VEHICLES, IMMEDIATELYAFTER THE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED. PERMITTEES MUST RE-INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES BEFORE THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT EVEN IF THE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE.6.PERMITTEES MUST PROTECT ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS USING APPROPRIATE BMPS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL THEY ESTABLISH PERMANENT COVER ON ALL AREAS WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THEINLET.7.PERMITTEES MAY REMOVE INLET PROTECTION FOR A PARTICULAR INLET IF A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN (E.G. STREET FLOODING/FREEZING) IS IDENTIFIED BY THE PERMITTEES OR THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY(E.G., CITY/COUNTY/TOWNSHIP/MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER). PERMITTEES MUST DOCUMENT THE NEED FOR REMOVAL IN THE SWPPP.8.PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT THE BASE OF STOCKPILES ON THE DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER.9.PERMITTEES MUST LOCATE STOCKPILES OUTSIDE OF NATURAL BUFFERS OR SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORMWATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS UNLESS THERE IS A BYPASS IN PLACEFOR THE STORMWATER. 10. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL A VEHICLE TRACKING BMP TO MINIMIZE THE TRACK OUT OF SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OR ONTO PAVED ROADS WITHIN THE SITE. 11. PERMITTEES MUST USE STREET SWEEPING IF VEHICLE TRACKING BMPS ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT TRACKING ONTO THE STREET. 12. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 14. 13. IN ANY AREAS OF THE SITE WHERE FINAL VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION WILL OCCUR, PERMITTEES MUST RESTRICT VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT USE TO MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION. 14. PERMITTEES MUST PRESERVE TOPSOIL ON THE SITE, UNLESS INFEASIBLE. 15. PERMITTEES MUST DIRECT DISCHARGES FROM BMPS TO VEGETATED AREAS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. 16. PERMITTEES MUST PRESERVE A 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER OR, IF A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE ON THE SITE, PROVIDE REDUNDANT (DOUBLE) PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS WHEN A SURFACE WATER IS LOCATEDWITHIN 50 FEET OF THE PROJECT'S EARTH DISTURBANCES AND STORMWATER FLOWS TO THE SURFACE WATER. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT LEAST 5 FEET APART UNLESS LIMITEDBY LACK OF AVAILABLE SPACE. NATURAL BUFFERS ARE NOT REQUIRED ADJACENT TO ROAD DITCHES, JUDICIAL DITCHES, COUNTY DITCHES, STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS, STORM DRAIN INLETS, ANDSEDIMENT BASINS. IF PRESERVING THE BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE, PERMITTEES MUST DOCUMENT THE REASONS IN THE SWPPP. SHEET PILING IS A REDUNDANT PERIMETER CONTROL IF INSTALLED IN A MANNER THATRETAINS ALL STORMWATER. 17. PERMITTEES MUST USE POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS, OR OTHER SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES, DOSING SPECIFICATIONS AND SEDIMENT REMOVALDESIGN SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER. THE PERMITTEES MUST USE CONVENTIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS PRIOR TO CHEMICAL ADDITION AND MUST DIRECT TREATEDSTORMWATER TO A SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM FOR FILTRATION OR SETTLEMENT OF THE FLOC PRIOR TO DISCHARGE.DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING (SECTION 10):1.PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE TURBID OR SEDIMENT-LADEN WATERS RELATED TO DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING (E.G., PUMPED DISCHARGES, TRENCH/DITCH CUTS FOR DRAINAGE) TO A TEMPORARY ORPERMANENT SEDIMENT BASIN ON THE PROJECT SITE UNLESS INFEASIBLE. PERMITTEES MAY DEWATER TO SURFACE WATERS IF THEY VISUALLY CHECK TO ENSURE ADEQUATE TREATMENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED ANDNUISANCE CONDITIONS (SEE MINN. R. 7050.0210, SUBP. 2) WILL NOT RESULT FROM THE DISCHARGE. IF PERMITTEES CANNOT DISCHARGE THE WATER TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING A SURFACEWATER, PERMITTEES MUST TREAT IT WITH APPROPRIATE BMPS SUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE SURFACE WATER OR DOWNSTREAM PROPERTIES.2.IF PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE WATER CONTAINING OIL OR GREASE, THEY MUST USE AN OIL-WATER SEPARATOR OR SUITABLE FILTRATION DEVICE (E.G., CARTRIDGE FILTERS, ABSORBENTS PADS) PRIOR TODISCHARGE.3.PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE ALL WATER FROM DEWATERING OR BASIN-DRAINING ACTIVITIES IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION OR SCOUR IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS ORINUNDATION OF WETLANDS IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS THAT CAUSES SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT TO THE WETLAND.4.IF PERMITTEES USE FILTERS WITH BACKWASH WATER, THEY MUST HAUL THE BACKWASH WATER AWAY FOR DISPOSAL, RETURN THE BACKWASH WATER TO THE BEGINNING OF THE TREATMENT PROCESS, ORINCORPORATE THE BACKWASH WATER INTO THE SITE IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION.INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE (SECTION 11):1.PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE A TRAINED PERSON, AS IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 21.2.B, WILL INSPECT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION SITE AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 1/2 INCH IN 24 HOURS.2.PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT AND MAINTAIN ALL PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT BMPS.3.PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS AND POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES TO ENSURE INTEGRITY AND EFFECTIVENESS. PERMITTEES MUST REPAIR,REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENT ALL NONFUNCTIONAL BMPS WITH FUNCTIONAL BMPS BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY AFTER DISCOVERY UNLESS ANOTHER TIME FRAME IS SPECIFIED IN ITEM 11.5 OR 11.6.PERMITTEES MAY TAKE ADDITIONAL TIME IF FIELD CONDITIONS PREVENT ACCESS TO THE AREA.4.DURING EACH INSPECTION, PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE DITCHES AND CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS BUT NOT CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, FOR EVIDENCE OF EROSION ANDSEDIMENT DEPOSITION. PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE WAYS, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND RESTABILIZE THEAREAS WHERE SEDIMENT REMOVAL RESULTS IN EXPOSED SOIL. PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF DISCOVERY UNLESS PRECLUDED BY LEGAL,REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. PERMITTEES MUST USE ALL REASONABLE EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ACCESS. IF PRECLUDED, REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MUST TAKE PLACE WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OFOBTAINING ACCESS. PERMITTEES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AUTHORITIES AND RECEIVING ANY APPLICABLE PERMITS, PRIOR TO CONDUCTING ANY WORK INSURFACE WATERS.5.PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT CONSTRUCTION SITE VEHICLE EXIT LOCATIONS, STREETS AND CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT FOR SEDIMENTATION FROM EROSION OR TRACKEDSEDIMENT FROM VEHICLES. PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM ALL PAVED SURFACES WITHIN ONE (1) CALENDAR DAY OF DISCOVERY OR, IF APPLICABLE, WITHIN A SHORTER TIME TO AVOID A SAFETY HAZARDTO USERS OF PUBLIC STREETS.6.PERMITTEES MUST REPAIR, REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENT ALL PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUNCTIONAL OR THE SEDIMENT REACHES 1/2 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE.7.PERMITTEES MUST DRAIN TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS AND REMOVE THE SEDIMENT WHEN THE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT COLLECTED IN THE BASIN REACHES 1/2 THE STORAGE VOLUME.8.PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE THAT AT LEAST ONE INDIVIDUAL PRESENT ON THE SITE (OR AVAILABLE TO THE PROJECT SITE IN THREE (3) CALENDAR DAYS) IS TRAINED IN THE JOB DUTIES DESCRIBED IN ITEM 21.2.B.9.PERMITTEES MAY ADJUST THE INSPECTION SCHEDULE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 11.2 AS FOLLOWS:a. INSPECTIONS OF AREAS WITH PERMANENT COVER CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH, EVEN IF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CONTINUES ON OTHER PORTIONS OF THE SITE; ORb.WHERE SITES HAVE PERMANENT COVER ON ALL EXPOSED SOIL AND NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS OCCURRING ANYWHERE ON THE SITE, INSPECTIONS CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH AND, AFTER 12MONTHS, MAY BE SUSPENDED COMPLETELY UNTIL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY RESUMES. THE MPCA MAY REQUIRE INSPECTIONS TO RESUME IF CONDITIONS WARRANT; ORc.WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS BEEN SUSPENDED DUE TO FROZEN GROUND CONDITIONS, INSPECTIONS MAY BE SUSPENDED. INSPECTIONS MUST RESUME WITHIN 24 HOURS OF RUNOFF OCCURRING, ORUPON RESUMING CONSTRUCTION, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. 10. PERMITTEES MUST RECORD ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BEING CONDUCTED AND THESE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED WITH THE SWPPP. THESE RECORDS MUST INCLUDE:a.DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTIONS; ANDb.NAME OF PERSONS CONDUCTING INSPECTIONS; ANDc.ACCURATE FINDINGS OF INSPECTIONS, INCLUDING THE SPECIFIC LOCATION WHERE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE NEEDED; ANDd.CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN (INCLUDING DATES, TIMES, AND PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES); ANDe.DATE OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 1/2 INCHES IN 24 HOURS, AND THE AMOUNT OF RAINFALL FOR EACH EVENT. PERMITTEES MUST OBTAIN RAINFALL AMOUNTS BY EITHER A PROPERLY MAINTAINED RAINGAUGE INSTALLED ONSITE, A WEATHER STATION THAT IS WITHIN ONE (1) MILE OF YOUR LOCATION, OR A WEATHER REPORTING SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES SITE SPECIFIC RAINFALL DATA FROM RADAR SUMMARIES;ANDf.IF PERMITTEES OBSERVE A DISCHARGE DURING THE INSPECTION, THEY MUST RECORD AND SHOULD PHOTOGRAPH AND DESCRIBE THE LOCATION OF THE DISCHARGE (I.E., COLOR, ODOR, SETTLED OR SUSPENDEDSOLIDS, OIL SHEEN, AND OTHER OBVIOUS INDICATORS OF POLLUTANTS); ANDg.ANY AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP PROPOSED AS A RESULT OF THE INSPECTION MUST BE DOCUMENTED AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 6 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS.POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT (SECTION 12):1.PERMITTEES MUST PLACE BUILDING PRODUCTS AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TOMINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. PERMITTEES ARE NOT REQUIRED TO COVER OR PROTECT PRODUCTS WHICH ARE EITHER NOT A SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION TO STORMWATER OR ARE DESIGNED TO BEEXPOSED TO STORMWATER.2.PERMITTEES MUST PLACE PESTICIDES, FERTILIZERS AND TREATMENT CHEMICALS UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TOMINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER.3.PERMITTEES MUST STORE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TOXIC WASTE, (INCLUDING OIL, DIESEL FUEL, GASOLINE, HYDRAULIC FLUIDS, PAINT SOLVENTS, PETROLEUM-BASED PRODUCTS, WOOD PRESERVATIVES,ADDITIVES, CURING COMPOUNDS, AND ACIDS) IN SEALED CONTAINERS TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MATERIALS MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITHMINN. R. CH. 7045 INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AS APPLICABLE.4.PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY STORE, COLLECT AND DISPOSE SOLID WASTE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7035.5.PERMITTEES MUST POSITION PORTABLE TOILETS SO THEY ARE SECURE AND WILL NOT TIP OR BE KNOCKED OVER. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY DISPOSE SANITARY WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7041.6.PERMITTEES MUST TAKE REASONABLE STEPS TO PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF SPILLED OR LEAKED CHEMICALS, INCLUDING FUEL, FROM ANY AREA WHERE CHEMICALS OR FUEL WILL BE LOADED OR UNLOADEDINCLUDING THE USE OF DRIP PANS OR ABSORBENTS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE ADEQUATE SUPPLIES ARE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES TO CLEAN UP DISCHARGED MATERIALS AND THAT ANAPPROPRIATE DISPOSAL METHOD IS AVAILABLE FOR RECOVERED SPILLED MATERIALS. PERMITTEES MUST REPORT AND CLEAN UP SPILLS IMMEDIATELY AS REQUIRED BY MINN. STAT. 115.061, USING DRY CLEAN UPMEASURES WHERE POSSIBLE.7.PERMITTEES MUST LIMIT VEHICLE EXTERIOR WASHING AND EQUIPMENT TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. PERMITTEES MUST CONTAIN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHING AREA IN A SEDIMENT BASIN OR OTHER SIMILARLYEFFECTIVE CONTROLS AND MUST DISPOSE WASTE FROM THE WASHING ACTIVITY PROPERLY. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY USE AND STORE SOAPS, DETERGENTS, OR SOLVENTS.8.PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONTAINMENT FOR ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BY WASHOUT OPERATIONS (E.G., CONCRETE, STUCCO, PAINT, FORM RELEASE OILS, CURING COMPOUNDS ANDOTHER CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS) RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. PERMITTEES MUST PREVENT LIQUID AND SOLID WASHOUT WASTES FROM CONTACTING THE GROUND AND MUST DESIGN THECONTAINMENT SO IT DOES NOT RESULT IN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHOUT OPERATIONS OR AREAS. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY DISPOSE LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA RULES. PERMITTEESMUST INSTALL A SIGN INDICATING THE LOCATION OF THE WASHOUT FACILITY.PERMIT TERMINATION (SECTION 4 AND SECTION 13):1.PERMITTEES MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER ALL TERMINATION CONDITIONS LISTED IN SECTION 13 ARE COMPLETE.2.PERMITTEES MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER SELLING OR OTHERWISE LEGALLY TRANSFERRING THE ENTIRE SITE, INCLUDING PERMIT RESPONSIBILITY FOR ROADS (E.G., STREET SWEEPING) ANDSTORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE FINAL CLEAN OUT, OR TRANSFERRING PORTIONS OF A SITE TO ANOTHER PARTY. THE PERMITTEES' COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT TERMINATES AT MIDNIGHT ON THE SUBMISSIONDATE OF THE NOT.3.PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND MUST INSTALL PERMANENT COVER OVER ALL AREAS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. VEGETATIVE COVER MUST CONSIST OF A UNIFORM PERENNIALVEGETATION WITH A DENSITY OF 70 PERCENT OF ITS EXPECTED FINAL GROWTH. VEGETATION IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE THE FUNCTION OF A SPECIFIC AREA DICTATES NO VEGETATION, SUCH AS IMPERVIOUSSURFACES OR THE BASE OF A SAND FILTER.4.PERMITTEES MUST CLEAN THE PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM OF ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND MUST ENSURE THE SYSTEM MEETS ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 15 THROUGH 19AND IS OPERATING AS DESIGNED.5.PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT.6.PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. PERMITTEES MAY LEAVE BMPS DESIGNED TO DECOMPOSE ON-SITE INPLACE.7.FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION ONLY, PERMIT COVERAGE TERMINATES ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS IF THE STRUCTURES ARE FINISHED AND TEMPORARY EROSION PREVENTION AND DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER CONTROLIS COMPLETE, THE RESIDENCE SELLS TO THE HOMEOWNER, AND THE PERMITTEE DISTRIBUTES THE MPCA'S "HOMEOWNER FACT SHEET" TO THE HOMEOWNER.8.FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ON AGRICULTURAL LAND (E.G., PIPELINES ACROSS CROPLAND), PERMITTEES MUST RETURN THE DISTURBED LAND TO ITS PRECONSTRUCTION AGRICULTURAL USE PRIOR TO SUBMITTINGTHE NOT.SEED NOTES:ALL SEED MIXES AND APPLICATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL.GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS:THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO SALVAGE AND PRESERVE EXISTING TOPSOIL NECESSARY FOR FINAL STABILIZATION AND TO ALSO MINIMIZE COMPACTION IN ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. IMMEDIATELY BEFORE SEEDINGTHE SOIL SHALL BE TILLED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3 INCHES.TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING, MULCHING & BLANKET.SEED·TEMPORARY SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 21-112 (WINTER WHEAT COVER CROP) FOR WINTER AND 21-111 (OATS COVER CROP) FOR SPRING/SUMMER APPLICATIONS. BOTH SEED MIXES SHALL BE APPLIED AT ASEEDING RATE OF 100 LBS/ACRE.MULCH·IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING, WITHIN 24 HOURS, MNDOT TYPE 1 MULCH SHOULD BE APPLIED TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE SEED GERMINATION. MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT 90% COVERAGE (2 TONS PER ACRE OFSTRAW MULCH)SLOPES·3:1 (HORIZ/VERT.) OR FLATTER MUCH SHALL BE COVERED WITH MULCH·SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR DITCH BOTTOMS SHALL BE COVERED WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET.·SEE PLAN FOR MORE DETAILED DITCH AND STEEP SLOPE EROSION CONTROL TREATMENTS.DESIGN ENGINEER: DAVID J. KNAEBLE P.E.TRAINING COURSE: DESIGN OF SWPPPTRAINING ENTITY: UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAINSTRUCTOR: JOHN CHAPMANDATES OF TRAINING COURSE: 8/22/2012- 8/23/2012TOTAL TRAINING HOURS: 12DATE OF RECERTIFICATION: 5/31/19EXPIRATION: 5/31/2022 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:21105............04/30/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/30/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.4SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS............ATTACHMENT A: SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENTPROJECT NAME: PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIALPROJECT LOCATION (BRIEFLY DESCRIBE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY OCCURS. INCLUDE ADDRESS IF AVAILABLE.)ADDRESS: 4660 W 77TH STCITY OR TOWNSHIP: EDINASTATE: MNZIP CODE: 55435LATITUDE/LONGITUDE OF APPROXIMATE CENTROID OF PROJECT: 44.863799 N, 93.342648 WMETHOD OF LAT/LONG COLLECTION (CIRCLE ONE): GPS ONLINE TOOL USGS TOPOGRAPHICALL CITIES WHERE CONSTRUCTION WILL OCCUR: EDINAALL COUNTIES WHERE CONSTRUCTION WILL OCCUR: HENNEPINALL TOWNSHIPS WHERE CONSTRUCTION WILL OCCUR: NAPROJECT SIZE (NUMBER OF ACRES TO BE DISTURBED): 5.8PROJECT TYPE (CIRCLE ONE): RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL ROAD CONSTRUCTION RESIDENTIAL & RD CONSTRUCTION OTHER (DESCRIBE): XXXXXCUMULATIVE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (TO THE NEAREST TENTH ACRE)EXISTING AREA OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE : 4.1POST CONSTRUCTION AREA OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 3.6TOTAL NEW AREA OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: -0.5RECEIVING WATERSWATER BODY IDNAME OF WATER BODY WATER BODY TYPE SPECIAL WATER? (Y/N) IMPARIED WATER (Y/N)07020012-51827-0027-00..NINEMILE CREEKEDINA LAKE..CREEKLAKE.. NN..YY..DATES OF CONSTRUCTIONCONSTRUCTION START DATE: 06/22ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: 11/24GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PROJECT INFORMATIONDESCRIBE THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (WHAT WILL BE BUILT, GENERAL TIMELINE, ETC): THE CONSTRUCTION IS TO BE A PROPOSED 400-UNIT RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT FACILITY WITH RELATED PARKING, STORMWATERMANAGEMENT AND MISC. SITE FEATURES ON A +/- 5.44-ACRE SITE.DESCRIBE SOIL TYPES FOUND AT THE PROJECT: XXXXXSITE LOCATION MAP - ATTACH MAPS (U.S. GEOLOGIC SURVEY 7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE, NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY MAPS OR EQUIVALENT) SHOWING THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ALL RECEIVING WATERS, INCLUDINGWETLANDS, DRAINAGE DITCHES, STORMWATER PONDS, OR BASINS, ETC. THAT WILL RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM THE PROJECT. USE ARROWS SHOWING THE DIRECTION OF FLOW AND DISTANCE TO THE WATER BODY.GENERAL SITE INFORMATION (III.A)1. DESCRIBE THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICIES (BMP'S). INCLUDE THE TIMING FOR INSTALLATION AND PROCEDURESUSED TO ESTABLISH ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY BMP'S AS NECESSARY. (III.A.4.A)THE PROJECT IS PROTECTED BY TWO (W) MAIN BMP'S, SILT FENCE AND INLET PROTECTION DEVICES. THE SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE DOWNHILL LOCATIONS OF THE SITE AND MONITORED AS NECESSARY. INLETPROTECTION DEVIDES WILL BE INSTALLED IN ALL CATCH BASINS ON THE SITE AND ANY OFF SITE THAT WILL RECEIVE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THIS SITE. AS THE PROJECT PROGRESSES ADDITIONAL BMP'S SUCH AS EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET MAY BE UTILITZED.2. ATTACH TO THIS SWPPP A TABLE WITH THE ANTICIPATED QUANITITIES FOR THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT FOR ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S (III.A.4.B) SEE PAGE SW1.33. ATTACH TO THIS SWPPP A SITE MAP THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING FEATURES (III.A.3.B-F):EXIST AND FINAL GRADES, INCLUDING DIVIDING LINES AND DIRECTION OF FLOW FOR ALL PRE AND POST-CONSTRUCTION STORMRWATER RUNOFF DRAINAGE AREAS LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS.LOCATIONS OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACES AND SOIL TYPES.·EXISTING AND FINAL GRADES, INCLUDING DIVIDING LINES AND DIRECTION OF FLOW FOR ALL PRE AND POST-CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER RUNOFF DRAINAGE AREAS LOCATED WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS.·LOCATIONS OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTRUBED.·LOCATION OF AREAS OF PHASED CONSTRUCTION.·ALL SURFACE WATERS AND EXISTING WETLANDS WITHIN ONE MILE FROM THE PROJECT BOUNDARIES THAT WILL RECEIVE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE SITE (IDENTIFIABLE ON MAPS SUCH AS USGS 7.5 MINUTEQUADRANGLE MAPS OR EQUIVALENT. WHERE SURFACE WATERS RECEIVING RUNOFF ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY WILL NOT FIT ON THE PLAN SHEET, THEY MUST BE IDENTIFIED WITH AN ARROW,INDICATING BOTH DIRECTION AND DISTANCE TO THE SURFACE WATER.·METHODS TO BE USED FOR FINAL STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREA4. WERE STORMWATER MITIGATION MEASURES REQUIRED AS THE RESULT OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, OR OTHER REQUIRED LOCAL, STATE OR FEDERAL REVIEW OF THE PROJECT? NOIF YES, DESCRIBE HOW THESE MEASURES WERE ADDRESSED IN THE SWPPP. (III.A.6)N/A5. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED IN A KARST AREA SUCH THAT ADDITIONAL MEASURES WOULD BE NECESSARY OT PROJECT DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREAS AS DESCRIBED IN MINN. R. CHAPTERS 7050 AND 7060? NOIF YES, DESCRIBE THE ADDITIONAL MEASURES TO BE USED. (III.A.7)N/A6. DOES THE SITE DISCHARGE TO A CALCEREOUS FEN LISTED IN MINN. R. 7050.0180, SUBP. 6 B? NOIF YES, A LETTER OF APPROVAL FROM THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO APPLICATION FOR THIS PERMIT. (PART I B.6 AND PART III.A.8)7. DOES THE SITE DISCHARGE TO A WATER THAT IS LISTED AS IMPARED FOR THE FOLLOWING POLLUTANT(S) OR STRESSOR(S): PHOSPHORUS, TURBIDITY, DISSOLVED OXYGEN OR BIOTIC IMPAIRMENT? USE THE SPECIAL ANDIMPAIRED WATERS SEARCH TOOL AT: WWW.PCA.STATE.MN.US/WATER/STORMWATER/STORMWATER-C.HTMLN/AIF NO, SKIP TO TRAININGDOES THE IMPAIRED WATER HAVE AN APPROVED TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS (TMDL) WITH AN APPROVED WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY? NOIF YES:A. LIST THE RECEIVING WATER, THE AREAS OF THE SITE DISCHARGING TO IT, AND THE POLLUTANT(S) IDENTIFIED IN THE TMDL.B. LIST THE BMP'S AND ANY OTHER SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER RELATED IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES IDENTIFIED IN THE TMDL.IF THE SITE HAS A DISCHARGE POINT WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE IMPAIRED WATER AND THE WATER FLOWS TO THE IMPAIRED WATER BUT NO SPECIFIC BMPS FOR CONSTRUCTION ARE IDENTIFIED IN THE TMDL, THE ADDITIONALBMPS IN APPENDIX A (C.1, C.2, C.3 & (C.4-TROUT STREAM)) MUST BE ADDED TO THE SWPPP AND IMPLEMENTED. (III.A.7). THE ADDITIONAL BMPS ONLY APPLY TO THOSE PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT THAT DRAIN TO ONE OF THEIDENTIFIED DISCHARGE POINTS.N/A8. IDENTIFY ADJACENT PUBLIC WATERS WHERE THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR) HAS DECLARED “WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS” DURING FISH SPAWNING TIMEFRAMESN/ASELECTION OF A PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (III.D.)1. WILL THE PROJECT CREATE A NEW CUMULATIVE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO ONE ACRE? NOIF YES, A WATER QUALITY VOLUME OF ONE INCH OF RUNOFF FROM THE CUMULATIVE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES MUST BE RETAINED ON SITE (SEE PART III.D OF THE PERMIT) THROUGH INFILTRATION UNLESS PROHIBITED DUETO ONE OF THE REASONS IN PART III.D.1.J. IF INFILTRATION IS PROHIBITED IDENTIFY OTHER METHOD OF OTHER VOLUME REDUCTION (E.G., FILTRATION SYSTEM, WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN, REGIONAL PONDING OR EQUIVALENTMETHOD2. DESCRIBE WHICH METHOD WILL BE USED TO TREAT RUNOFF FROM THE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES CREATED BY THE PROJECT (III.D):·WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN·INFILTRATION/FILTRATION·REGIONAL PONDS·COMBINATION OF PRACTICESINCLUDE ALL CALCULATIONS AND DESIGN INFORMATION FOR THE METHOD SELECTED. SEE PART III.D OF THE PERMIT FOR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH EACH METHOD.INFILTRATION / FILTRATION / REGIONAL PONDINGCALCULATIONS ARE WITHIN THE SITE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT AND PART OF THIS SWPPP AS ATTACHMENT D.3. IF IT IS NOT FEASIBLE TO MEET THE TREATMENT REQUIREMENT FOR THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME, DESCRIBE WHY. THIS CAN INCLUDE PROXIMITY TO BEDROCK OR ROAD PROJECTS WHERE THE LACK OF RIGHT OF WAYPRECLUDES THE INSTALLATION OF ANY PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. DESCRIBE WHAT OTHER TREATMENT, SUCH AS GRASSES SWALES, SMALLER PONDS, OR GRIT CHAMBERS, WILL BE IMPLEMENTEDTO TREAT RUNOFF PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATERS. (III.C)IT IS FEASIBLE TO MEET REQUIREMENT FOR WATER QUALITY VOLUME.4. FOR PROJECTS THAT DISCHARGE TO TROUT STREAMS, INCLUDING TRIBUTARIES TO TROUT STREAMS, IDENTIFY METHOD OF INCORPORATING TEMPERATURE CONTROLS INTO THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENTSYSTEM.N/AEROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES (IV.B)DESCRIBE THE TYPES OF TEMPORARY EROSION PREVENTION BMP'S EXPECTED TO BE IMPLEMENTED ON THIS SITE DURING CONSTRUCITON:1. DESCRIBE CONSTRUCTION PHASING, VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, HORIZONTAL SLOPE GRADING, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES TO MINIMIZE EROSION. DELINEATE AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED (E.G., WITH FLAGS,STAKES, SIGNS, SILT FENCE, ETC.) BEFORE WORK BEGINS.SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AT ATHE DOWNHILL LOCATIONS OF THE SITE.2. DESCRIBE METHODS OF TEMPORARILY STABILIZING SOILS AND SOIL STOCKPILES (E.G., MULCHES, HYDRAULIC TACKIFIERS, EROSION BLANKETS, ETC.):TEMPORARY EROSION PROTECTION WILL BE SEED AND MULCH AND EROSION BLANKETS WHERE REQUIRED, WITH PERMANENT COVER BEING EITHER SOD OR LANDSCAPE FEATURES.3. DESCRIBE METHODS OF DISSIPATING VELOCITY ALONG STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS AND AT CHANNEL OUTLETS (E.G., CHECK DAMS, SEDIMENT TRAPS, RIP RAP, ETC.):SOD WILL BE UTILIZED ALONG CHANNELS AND RIP RAP AT CHANNEL.4. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR STABILIZATION OF DITCH AND SWALE WETTED PERIMETERS (NOTE THAT MULCH, HYDRAULIC SOIL TACKIFIERS, HYDROMULCHES, ETC. ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE SOIL STABILIZATION METHODSFOR ANY PART OF A DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE)FINAL STABILIZATION OF SWALES WILL BE SOD5. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR ENERGY DISSIPATION AT PIPE OUTLETS (E.G., RIP RAP, SPLASH PADS, GABIONS, ETC.)RIP RAP WILL BE UTILIZED AT PIPE OUTLETS6. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED TO PROMOTE INFILTRATION AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL ON THE SITE PRIOR TO OFFSITE DISCHARGE, UNLESS INFEASIBLE (E.G., DIRECT STORMWATER FLOW TO VEGETATED AREAS):DISCONNECTED IMPERVIOUS AREA AND INFILTRATION AREAS WILL BE UTILIZED7. FOR DRAINAGE OR DIVERSION DITCHES, DESCRIBE PRACTICES TO STABILIZE THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER WITHIN 200 LINEAL FEET OF THE PROPERTY EDGE OR POINT OF DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATER. THE LAST 200LINEAL FEET MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTING TO SURFACE WATERS AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED FOR ALL DISCHARGES TOSPECIAL, IMPAIRED OR “WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS”. ALL OTHER REMAINING PORTIONS OF THE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER,PROPERTY EDGE AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT AREA HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED.N/A, NO DITCHES ON SITE8. DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL EROSION PREVENTION MEASURES THAT WILL BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION (E.G., CONSTRUCTION PHASING, MINIMIZING SOIL DISTURBANCE, VEGETATIVE BUFFERS, HORIZONTALSLOPE GRADING, SLOPE DRAINING/TERRACING, ETC.):OTHER EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO; MINIMIZING SITE EXPOSURE WHEN POSSIBLE.9. IF APPLICABLE, INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN APPENDIX A PART C.3 REGARDING MAINTAINING A 100-FOOT BUFFER ZONE OR INSTALLING REDUNDANT BMPS FOR PORTIONS OF THE SITE THAT DRAIN TO SPECIALWATERS).N/A10. IF APPLICABLE, DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL EROSION PREVENTION BMPS TO BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE SITE TO PROTECT PLANNED INFILTRATION AREASMINIMIZE SITE EXPOSURE IN AREAS ADJACENT TO INFILTRATION AREAS.SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICIES (IV.C)DESCRIBE THE METHODS OF SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO BE IMPLEMENTED AT THIS SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MINIMIZE SEDIMENT IMPACTS TO SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMSSILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AROUND THE ENTIRE PERIMETER OF THE SITE2. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SOIL STOCKPILES:SEED AND MULCH AS WELL AS EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS WILL BE UTILIZED AS NECESSARY3. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION:SEE INLET PROTECTION DETAILS4. DESCRIBE METHODS TO MINIMIZE VEHICLE TRACKING AT CONSTRUCTION EXITS AND STREET SWEEPING ACTIVITIES:THE PROJECT WILL UTILIZE A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.5. DESCRIBE METHODS, IF APPLICABLE, ADDITIONAL SEDIMENT CONTROLS (E.G., DIVERSION BERMS) TO BE INSTALLED TO KEEP RUNOFF AWAY FROM PLANNED INFILTRATION AREAS WHEN EXCAVATED PRIOR TO FINALSTABILIZATION OF THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA:SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER GRADING TO PROTECT INFILTRATION AREAS.6. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED TO MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION AND PRESERVE TOP SOIL (UNLESS INFEASIBLE) AT THIS SITE:LIGHT TRACKED EQUIPMENT WILL BE USED, TOPSOIL WILL BE STRIPPED AND STOCKPILED7. DESCRIBE PLANS TO PRESERVE A 50-FOOT NATURAL BUFFER BETWEEN THE PROJECT'S SOIL DISTURBANCE AND A SURFACE WATER OR PLANS FOR REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS IF A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE:DOUBLE ROW OF SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED ALONG WETLAND. PROJECT WILL NOT DISTURB WITHIN 200 FEET OF WETLAND.8. DESCRIBE PLANS FOR USE OF SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS (E.G., POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS, ETC.) SEE PART IV.C.10 OF THE PERMIT:N/A9. IS THE PROJECT REQUIRED TO INSTALL A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN DUE TO 10 OR MORE ACRES DRAINING TO A COMMON LOCATION OR 5 ACRES OR MORE IF THE SITE IS WITHIN 1 MILE OF A SPECIAL OR IMPAIRED WATER?NOIF YES, DESCRIBE (OR ATTACH PLANS ) SHOWING HOW THE BASIN WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART III.C OF THE PERMIT.N/ADEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING (IV.D)1. WILL THE PROJECT INCLUDE DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING? NOIF YES, DESCRIBE MEASURES TO BE USED TO TREAT/DISPOSE OF TURBID OR SEDIMENT-LADEN WATER AND METHOD TO PREVENT EROSION OR SCOUR OF DISCHARGE POINTS (SEE PART IV. D OF THE PERMIT):N/A 2. WILL THE PROJECT INCLUDE USE OF FILTERS FOR BACKWASH WATER? NOIF YES, DESCRIBE HOW FILTER BACKWASH WATER WILL BE MANAGED ON THE SITE OR PROPERLY DISPOSED (SEE PART III.D.3. OF THE PERMIT):N/AADDITIONAL BMP'S FOR SPECIAL WATERS AND DISCHARGES TO WETLANDS (APPENDIX A, PARTS C AND D)1. SPECIAL WATERS. DOES YOUR PROJECT DISCHARGE TO SPECIAL WATERS? NO2. IF PROXIMITY TO BEDROCK OR ROAD PROJECTS WHERE THE LACK OF RIGHT OF WAY PRECLUDES THE INSTALLATION OF ANY OF THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, THEN OTHER TREATMENT SUCH ASGRASSED SWALES, SMALLER PONDS, OR GRIT CHAMBERS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATERS. DESCRIBE WHAT OTHER TREATMENT WILL BE PROVIDED.N/A3. DESCRIBE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS FOR EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITH A CONTINUOUS POSITIVE SLOPE TO A SPECIAL WATERS, AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS FOR AREAS THAT DRAIN FIVE OR MORE ACRESDISTURBED AT ONE TIME.N/A4. DESCRIBE THE UNDISTURBED BUFFER ZONE TO BE USED (NOT LESS THAN 100 LINEAR FEET FROM THE SPECIAL WATER).N/A5. DESCRIBE HOW THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WILL ENSURE THAT THE PRE AND POST PROJECT RUNOFF RATE AND VOLUME FROM THE 1, AND 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION EVENTS REMAINS THESAME.N/A6. DESCRIBE HOW THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WILL MINIMIZE ANY INCREASE IN THE TEMPERATURE OF TROUT STREAM RECEIVING WATERS RESULTING IN THE 1, AND 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATIONEVENTS.N/A7. WETLANDS. DOES YOUR PROJECT DISCHARGE STORMWATER WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS TO A WETLAND (E.G., CONVERSION OF A NATURAL WETLAND TO A STORMWATER POND)? YES OR NOIF YES, DESCRIBE THE WETLAND MITIGATION SEQUENCE THAT WILL BE FOLLOWED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART D OF APPENDIX A.N/AINSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE (IV.E)DESCRIBE PROCEDURES TO ROUTINELY INSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE:·ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND·WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS, AND WITHIN (7) DAYS AFTER THATINSPECTIONS MUST INCLUDE STABILIZED AREAS, EROSION PREVENTION,AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S AND INFILTRATION AREAS.INSPECTOR WILL FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED ABOVE AND FILL OUT "ATTACHMENT B - CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLIST"1. Describe practices for storage of building products with a potential to leach pollutants to minimize exposure to stormwater:ALL BUILDING PRODUCTS WILL BE SEALED AND STORED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE EXPOSURE2. Describe practices for storage of pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers, treatment chemical, and landscape materials:ALL LANDSCAPE TREATMENT CHEMICALS WILL BE SEALED AND STORED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZED EXPOSURE3. Describe practices for storage and disposal of hazardous materials or toxic waste (e.g., oil, fuel, hydraulic fluids, paint solvents, petroleum-based products, wood preservative, additives, curing compounds, and acids) according to Minn. R. ch. 7045, includingrestricted access and secondary containment:ALL HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE APPROPRIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF SITE ACCORDING TO LOCAL AND STATE LAWS.4. Describe collection, storage and disposal of solid waste in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7035:ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND SOLID WASTER WILL BE APPROPRIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF SITE ACCORDING TO LOCAL AND STATE LAWS5. Describe management of portable toilets to prevent tipping and disposal of sanitary wastes in accordance with Minn. R. ch. 7040:SANITARY AND SEPTIC SERVICES WILL BE PROVIDED TO WORKERS WITH PORTABLE FACILITIES MAINTAINED AS NEEDED BY THE PROVIDER.6. Describe spill prevention and response for fueling and equipment or vehicle maintenance:EMPLOYEES WILL BE TRAINED IN TECHNIQUES DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE SPILLS. VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CHECKED FOR LEAKS.7. Describe containment and disposal of vehicle and equipment wash water and prohibiting engine degreasing on the site:ALL CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES SHALL BE WASHED OFF SITE8. Describe storage and disposal of concrete and other washout wastes so that wastes do not contact the ground:ALL CONCRETE WASHOUT SHALL OCCUR OFF SITE.FINAL STABILIZATION (IV.G)1. DESCRIBE METHOD OF FINAL STABILIZATION (PERMANENT COVER) OF ALL DISTURBED AREAS:FINAL STABILIZATION WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH PAVEMENT, SOD AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS.2. DESCRIBE PROCEDURES FOR COMPLETING FINAL STABILIZATION AND TERMINATING PERMIT COVERAGE (SEE PART IV.G.1-5):UPON STABILIZATION DESCRIBED ABOVE, THE CONTRCTOR AND OWNER SHALL MUTUALLY TRANSFER THE NPDES PERMIT TO THE NEXT OWNER WITH DOCUMENTS DESCRIBING THE NATURE OF TERMINATION PROCEDURE.DOCUMENTATION OF INFEASIBILITY: (IF APPLICABLE)SOILS INFORMATIONMAP UNITSYMBOLL50AMUSKEGO AND HOUGHTONSOILS, 0 TO 1 PERCENT SLOPESMAP UNIT NAMEU1AURBAN LAND-UDORTHENTS, WETSUBSTRATUM, COMPLEX, 0 TO 2PERCENT SLOPES....U1AL50A 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:21105............04/30/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/30/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.5SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS............ATTACHMENT B: SWPPP INSPECTION FORMATTACHMENT C: MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMNOTE: THIS INSPECTION REPORT DOES NOT ADDRESS ALL ASPECTS OF THE NATIONAL APOLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM/STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (NPDES/SDS) CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT ISSUED ON AUGUST 1,2013. THE COMPLETION OF THIS CHECKLIST DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ALL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS ARE IN COMPLIANCE; IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE(S) TO READ AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.FACILITY INFORMATIONSITE NAME: FACILITY ADDRESS: PERMIT NUMBER:CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE:INSPECTION INFORMATIONINSPECTOR NAME: _______________________ PHONE NUMBER: _________________________DATE (MM/DD/YYYY): _____________________TIME: ____________ AM / PMIS THE INSPECTOR CERTIFIED IN SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL AND IS IT DOCUMENTED IN THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP)?IS THIS INSPECTION ROUTINE OR IN RESPONSE TO A STORM EVENT:RAINFALL AMOUNT (IF APPLICABLE): ____________IS THE SITE WITHIN ONE AERIAL MILE OF A SPECIAL OR IMPARED WATER?IF YES, FOLLOW APPENDIX A AND OTHER APPLICABLE PERMIT REQUIREMENTSNOTE: IF N/A IS SELECTED AT ANY TIME, SPECIFY WHY IN THE COMMENT AREA FOR THAT SECTION.EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENT (PART IV.B)1.SOIL STABILIZATION WHERE NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FOR 14 DAYS? (7 DAYS WHERE APPLICABLE)2.HAS THE NEED TO DISTURB STEEP SLOPES BEEN MINIMIZED?3.ALL DITCHES STABILIZED 200; BACK FROM POINT OF DISCHARGE WITHIN 24 HOURS? (NOT MULCH)4.ARE THERE BMP'S FOR ONSITE STOCKPILES?5.ARE APPROPRIATE BMP'S INSTALLED PROTECTING INLETS/OUTLETS?6.DO PIPE OUTLETS HAVE ENERGY DISSIPATION?COMMENTS:SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENT (PART IV.C)1.PERIMETER CONTROL INSTALLED ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS?2.PERIMETER CONTROL TRENCHED IN WHERE APPROPRIATE?3.50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER MAINTAINED AROUND ALL SURFACE WATERS?3.1.IF NO, HAVE REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS BEEN INSTALLED?4.INLET PROTECTION ON ALL CATCH BASINS AND CULVERT INLETS?5.VEHICLE TRACKING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AT ALL SITE EXITS?6.ALL TRACKED SEDIMENT REMOVED WITHIN 24 HOURS?7.ARE ALL INFILTRATION SYSTEMS STAKED AND MARKED TO AVOID COMPACTION?8.ARE ALL INFILTRATION AREAS PROTECTED WITH A PRETREATMENT DEVICE?9.DO ALL STOCKPILES HAVE PERIMETER CONTROLS?COMMENTS:MAINTENANCE-EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S (PART IV.E.)1.ARE ALL PREVIOUSLY STABILIZED AREAS MAINTAINING 90% GROUND COVER?2.ANY DITCH EROSION OBSERVED?3.PERIMETER CONTROL--HAS SEDIMENT REACHED ONE HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE?4.ARE INLET PROTECTION DEVICES MAINTAINED AND FUNCTIONING PROPERLY?COMMENTS:OTHER1.ARE ALL MATERIALS THAT CAN LEACH POLLUTANTS UNDER COVER?2.HAS ACCESS BEEN RESTRICTED TO ONSITE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS?3.DOES ON-SITE FUELING ONLY OCCUR IN A CONTAINED AREA?4.ARE ALL SOLID WASTES BEING PROPERLY DISPOSED OF?5.IS THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA COMPLETELY CONTAINED?6.IS THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA MARKED WITH SIGN?COMMENTS:7.WERE ANY DISCHARGES SEEN DURING THIS INSPECTION, SEDIMENT, WATER, OR OTHERWISE?7.1.IF YES, STATE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL POINTS OF DISCHARGE. PHOTOGRAPH THE DISCHARGE AND DESCRIBE THE DISCHARGE (COLOR, ODOR, FOAM, OIL SHEEN, ETC). HOW WILL IT BE REMOVED? HOW DID THE DISCHARGEHAPPEN? HOW MUCH WAS DISCHARGED? HOW WILL IT BE STOPPED, AND HOW LONG WILL IT TAKE TO STOP? IS THE DISCHARGE GOING INTO AN ADJACENT SITE? WAS THE DISCHARGE A SEDIMENT DELTA? IF YES, WILL THE DELTA BERECOVERED WITHIN 7 DAYS?8.WILL A PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM BE UTILIZED IN THIS PROJECT AS REQUIRED AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART III.D OF THE PERMIT? DESCRIBE:9.IS ANY DEWATERING OCCURRING ON SITE?9.1.IF YES, WHERE? WHAT BMP IS BEING USED? HOW MUCH WATER IS BEING DEWATERED? IS THE WATER CLEAR? WHERE IS THE WATER BEING DISCHARGED TO?10.IS A COPY OF THE SWPPP LOCATED ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE?11.HAS THE SWPPP BEEN FOLLOWED AND IMPLEMENTED ON SITE?12.IS A SEDIMENTATION BASIN REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT AS SPECIFIED IN THE PERMIT?12.1.IF YES, ARE THEY MAINTAINED AS SPECIFIED IN THE PERMIT?13.IS THE TOPSOIL ON THIS PROJECT BEING PRESERVED?13.1.IF YES, EXPLAIN HOW THE TOP SOIL IS BEING PRESERVED. IF NO, EXPLAIN WHY IT WAS INFEASIBLE.14.ARE ALL INFILTRATION SYSTEMS MARKED TO AVOID COMPACTION?14.1.DO ALL INFILTRATION AREAS HAVE PRETREATMENT DEVICES?15.DESCRIPTION OF AREAS OF NON-COMPLIANCE NOTED DURING THE INSPECTION, REQUIRED CORRECTIVE ACTIONS, AND RECOMMENDED DATE OF COMPLETION OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS:16.PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP:17.POTENTIAL AREAS OF FUTURE CONCERN:18.ADDITIONAL COMMENTSDISCLOSURES:·AFTER DISCOVERY, THE PERMIT REQUIRES MANY OF THE DEFICIENCIES THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THIS CHECKLIST BE CORRECTED WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD OF TIME. SEE PERMIT FOR MORE DETAILS.·THIS INSPECTION CHECKLIST IS AN OPTION FOR SMALL CONSTRUCTION SITES. LARGE CONSTRUCTION SITES AND LINEAR PROJECTS REQUIRE MORE EXTENSIVE/MORE LOCATION SPECIFIC INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS.·THE PERMITTEE(S) IS/ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT BMP'S AS WELL AS EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S UNTILANOTHER PERMITTEE HAS OBTAINED COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT ACCORDING TO PART II.B.5., OR THE PROJECT HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION AND A NOTICE OF TERMINATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA.Y N N/AY N N/AY N N/AY N N/AY N N/AY N N/AY N N/AY N N/AATTACHMENT C - CHAMBERFACILITY MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE1.ALL GRIT CHAMBERS, SUMP CATCH BASINS, SUMP MANHOLES, OUTLET STRUCTURES, CULVERTS, OUTFALL STRUCTURES AND OTHERSTORM WATER FACILITIES FOR WHICH MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED HEREIN MUST BE INSPECTED IN THESPRING, SUMMER AND FALL OF EACH YEAR. WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE INSPECTION DATE, ALL ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS MUST BEREMOVED SUCH THAT EACH STORM WATER FACILITY OPERATES AS DESIGNED AND PERMITTED. CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREAS MUST BEKEPT CLEAR OF LITTER AND VEGETATIVE DEBRIS, INFLOW PIPES AND OVERFLOW SPILLWAYS KEPT CLEAR, INLET AREAS KEPT CLEAN, ANDUNDESIRABLE VEGETATION REMOVED. EROSION IMPAIRING THE FUNCTION OR INTEGRITY OF THE FACILITIES, IF ANY, WILL BE CORRECTED,AND ANY STRUCTURAL DAMAGE IMPAIRING OR THREATENING TO IMPAIR THE FUNCTION OF THE FACILITIES MUST BE REPAIRED.2.VOLUME CONTROL FACILITIES AND CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREAS MUST BE INSPECTED EVERY THREE MONTHS DURING THEOPERATIONAL PERIOD (BETWEEN SPRING SNOWMELT AND FIRST SUBSTANTIAL SNOWFALL) AND MONITORED AFTER RAINFALL EVENTS OF 1INCH OR MORE TO ENSURE THAT THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IS CLEAR OF LITTER AND DEBRIS, INFLOW PIPES AND OVERFLOWSPILLWAYS ARE CLEAR, INLET AREAS ARE CLEAN, UNDESIRABLE VEGETATION IS REMOVED AND THERE IS NO EROSION IMPAIRING ORTHREATENING TO IMPAIR THE FUNCTION OF A FACILITY. IF SEDIMENT HAS ACCUMULATED IN A INFILTRATION FEATURE, WITHIN 30 DAYS OFINSPECTION DEPOSITED SEDIMENTS MUST BE REMOVED, THE INFILTRATION CAPACITY OF THE UNDERLYING SOILS MUST BE RESTORED,AND ANY SURFACE DISTURBANCE MUST BE STABILIZED. INSPECTION MUST ENSURE THAT SEDIMENT TRAPS AND FOREBAYS ARE TRAPPINGSEDIMENT AND THAT MORE THAN 50 PERCENT OF THE STORAGE VOLUME REMAINS, THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IS STABLE (I.E., NOEROSION IS OBSERVED), AND INLETS AND OUTLET/OVERFLOW SPILLWAYS ARE IN GOOD CONDITIONS WITH NO EROSION. MAINTENANCETECHNIQUES USED MUST PROTECT THE INFILTRATION CAPACITY OF THE PRACTICE BY LIMITING SOIL COMPACTION TO THE GREATESTEXTENT POSSIBLE (E.G., BY USING LOW-IMPACT EARTH-MOVING EQUIPMENT).3.UNDERGROUND STORAGE CHAMBERS MUST BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE A YEAR TO ENSURE THAT ADEQUATE STORAGE CAPACITY REMAINS.CAPACITY WILL BE CONSIDERED INADEQUATE IF SEDIMENT HAS DECREASED THE STORAGE VOLUME BY 50 PERCENT OF ITS ORIGINAL DESIGNVOLUME. ACCUMULATED DEBRIS AND SEDIMENT WILL BE REMOVED, AND INLET AND OUTLET STRUCTURES WILL BE CLEARED OF ANY FLOWIMPEDIMENTS. 768. 0' 408. 0 ' 240. 0 ' 528. 0' 120.0' 264. 0 ' 84. 0'84. 0'180. 0'180.0'35'BUILDINGSETBACKNOPARKING1 A PAINTED SHARED BIKE LANE SPECIAL PAVING AT PLAZA FOUNDATION PLANTINGS AT ENTIRE BUILDING PERIMETER; MIX OF SHRUBS, PERENNIALS, GROUNDCOVERS COLUMNAR TREES AT BUILDING WALL COLUMNAR TREES AT BUILDING WALL SPECIAL PAVING AT ENTRY PLAZA AND IN PARKING BAYS ENHANCED PLANTINGS AT ENTRY STAIR ORNAMENTAL TREES AT DRIVE EDGE SHRUB HEDGE AT DRIVE EDGE CANOPY TREES IN GRASS BOULEVARD ENHANCED PLANTINGS AT SITE ENTRY ENHANCED PLANTINGS AT SITE ENTRY COLUMNAR TREES AT BUILDING WALL SIDEWALK WITH DRIVEABLE CRUSHED STONE SHOULDERS FOR FIRE ACCESS ACCESSIBLE WALK CONNECTION TO PARK ASPEN BOSQUE BOSQUE OF COLUMNAR TREES PICKLEBALL COURT ACCESSIBLE WALK CONNECTION TO PARK HOT TUB SUN DECK LOUNGE SEATING AREAS TERRACING DOWN HILLSIDE STORMWATER FEATURE CASCADES DOWN THROUGH ENTIRE COURTYARD AMENITY DECK WITH GRILLS, BAR, SINK, FIRE PIT, LOUNGE FURNISHINGS DOG RUN WITH 4' TALL, BLACK VINYL-COATED CHAIN LINK FENCE AND DOGIPOT WASTE STATION PUBLIC TRAIL ACCESS TO PARK TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering B K V R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2395-03 Pentagon Park/2395-03 Pentagon Park_LAND_2021.rvt4/29/2021 6:55:31 PMBH BH 2395-03 L100 OVERALL SITE/LANDSCAPE PLAN PENTAGON PARK APARTMENTS ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 04-30-2021 SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL 1" = 20'-0"L100 1 OVERALL SITE LANDSCAPE REFERENCE PLAN PROPOSED PLANT SCHEDULE: QTY SYM COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME PLANTING SIZE PERENNIALS/VINES/ANNUALS 1 ac MAGGIE DALEY ASTILBE Astilbe chinensis 'Maggie Daley' #1 CONT. 1 ca FEATHER REED GRASS Calamagrostis arundinacea var. brachtytricha #1 CONT. 1 hb BLUE ANGEL HOSTA Hosta 'Blue Angel'#1 CONT. 1 hh HAPPY RETURNS DAYLILY Hemerocallis 'Happy Returns' #1 CONT. 1 pa HAMELN FOUNTAIN GRASS Pennisetum alopecuroides 'Hameln' #1 CONT. 1 pt PACHYSANDRA 'Green Carpet' Pachysandra terminalis 'Green Carpet' #1 CONT. 1 pv NORTHWIND SWITCHGRASS Panicum virgatum 'Northwind' #1 CONT. 1 rh WALKER'S LOW CATMINT Nepeta x faassenii 'Walker's Low' #1 CONT. 1 sh PRAIRIE DROPSEED Sporobolus heterolepis #1 CONT. 1 ss LITTLE BLUESTEM 'Blue Heaven' Schizachyrium scoparium 'Minnblue A' (PP17, 310) #1 CONT. ORNAMENTAL TREES 7 AG AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY Amelanchir x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance' 2" CAL. 2 BP WHITESPIRE BIRCH (CLUMP) Betula populifolia 'Whitespire' 2.5" CAL. 8 CC NORTHERN CLUMP REDBUD Cercis canadensis #20 CONT. 5 SR SUMMER STORM LILAC Syringa reticulata 'Summer Storm' (PPAF) 2" CAL. DECIDUOUS TREES 8 AS GREEN MOUNTAIN SUGAR MAPLE Acer saccharum 'Green Mountain' 2.5" CAL. 7 BN RIVER BIRCH Betula nigra 2.5" CAL. 6 BP DAKOTA PINNACLE BIRCH Betula platyphylla 'Fargo' 2.5" CAL. 3 GB AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO Ginkgo Biloba 'Autumn Gold' 2.5" CAL. 8 GT SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST Gleditsia triacanthos var. inermis 'Skycole' 2.5" CAL. 6 PT PRAIRIE GOLD ASPEN Populus tremuloides 'NEArb' 2.5" CAL. 8 QA QUAKING ASPEN Populous tremuloides #20 CONT. 7 QB SWAMP WHITE OAK Quercus bicolor 2.5" CAL. 5 QW KINDRED SPIRIT OAK Quercus x warei 'Nadler' 2.5" CAL. 5 TA AMERICAN SENTRY LINDEN Tilia americana 'MnKSentry' 2.5" CAL. DECIDUOUS SHRUBS 1 Bw NORTHERN CHARM BOXWOOD Buxus 'Wilson'#3 CONT. 1 Cc SUGARTINA CLETHRA Clethra alnifolia 'Crystalina' (PP21, 561) #2 CONT. 1 Cf ARCTIC FIRE DOGWOOD Cornus stolonifera 'Farrow' (PP18,523) #5 CONT. 1 Cs CARDINAL DOGWOOD Cornus sericea 'Cardinal' #5 CONT. 1 Ds BUTTERFLY BUSH HONEYSUCKLE Diervilla sessilifolia 'Butterfly' #5 CONT. 1 Dw DWARF WINGED EUONYMOU Euonymous alatus 'Compactus' #10 CONT. 1 Ra GRO LOW SUMAC Rhus aromatica 'Gro Low' #5 CONT. 1 Sm DWARF KOREAN LILAC Syringe meyeri 'Palibin' #5 CONT. 1 Sr RED ELDERBERRY Sambucus racemosa #5 CONT. 1 Ss SEM FALSE SPIREA Sorbaria sorbifolia 'Sem'(PP16,336) #2 CONT. CONIFEROUS TREES 1 JC SPARTAN JUNIPER Juniper chinensis 'Spartan' 6' B&B 12 PA NORWAY SPRUCE Picea abies 8' B&B 7 PS WHITE PINE Pinus Strobus 6' B&B CONIFEROUS SHRUBS 1 Cp KING'S GOLD CHAMAECYPARIS Chamaecyparis pisifera 'King's gold' #5 CONT. 1 Ct HEATHERBUN CHAMAECYPARIS Chamaecyparis thyoides 'Heather Bun' #5 CONT. 1 Jh BLUE CHIP JUNIPER Juniperus horizontalis 'Blue Chip' #5 CONT. 1 Jp SEA GREEN JUNIPER Juniperus x pfitseriana 'Sea Green' #5 CONT. 1 Js BLUE FOREST JUNIPER Juniperus sabina 'Blue Forest' #5 CONT. 1 Pb SCHOODIC PINE Pinus banksiana 'Schoodic' #3 CONT. 1 Tc TECHNITO ARBORVITAE Thuja occidentalis 'Bailjohn' (PP15, 850) 6' B&B *PLANT SCHEDULE FOR SPECIES REFERENCE ONLY, FINAL QUANTITIES TO BE DETERMINED IRRIGATION NOTE: ALL PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE DRIPLINE IRRIGATION, ALL TURF AREAS TO RECEIVE SPRAY NOZZLES RESIDENTIAL UNITS 7TH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN STAIR ROOF BELOW ROOF BELOW 5TH - 6TH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN3RD - 4TH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 2ND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN1ST LEVEL FLOOR PLANP1 LEVEL FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLANS A2-0 ROOF BELOW ROOF BELOW ROOF BELOW RESIDENTIAL UNITSRESIDENTIAL UNITS STAIRSTAIR STAIR STAIR STAIR STOR.STOR.STOR.STOR.STOR.STOR. M T M T M TM T M T M T M TELEVATORSELEVATORSELEVATORS RESIDENTIAL UNITS PLAZA DECK PLAZA DECK PUB GUEST SUITE COWORKLOUNGELOUNGEOPEN TO BELOW CONF. FITNESS WEIGHT ROOM FITNESS YOGA GAME ROOM PLAZA DECK GARAGE ENTRY RESIDENTIAL UNITS RESIDENTIAL UNITS RESIDENTIAL UNITS RESIDENTIAL UNITS RESIDENTIAL UNITS RESIDENTIAL UNITS RESIDENTIAL UNITS CLUB ROOM SAUNA POOL MECH RAMP DN.RAMP DN.RAMP UPMECH STOR. M TSTAIR HALF STORY USE TBD OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW MECH RESIDENTIAL UNITS MECH TRASH LOBBY LEASE MAIL PACK.TRASH BIKE CAFE 8% RAMP MECH RAMP UPREFLECTING POOLEXT. METAL GRATE STAIR AMENITY 0 40 80 N COLORED, PATTERNED ROCK BALLASTED ROOF 388'-8"184'-0"65'- 0"65'-0"65'-0"177'-0"402'-0"AMENITY 40'-0"131'-10"65'-0"86'-10"65'-0" STAIR STAIR STAIR STAIR STAIR STAIR STAIRSTAIRSTAIRSTAIRSTAIRSTAIR ELEVATORS ELEVATOR ELEVATORS201'-8"ELEVATOR ELEVATOR ELEVATOR ELEVATOR ELEVATOR ELEVATOR ELEVATOR ELEVATORS8'-0"22'-0"OPTIONAL PARKING AREA (BASED ON FEASIBILITY) BUILDING AREA:97,581 SF MEP STORAGE:950 SF TRASH/LOADING:969 SF AMENITY:1,786 SF LOBBY/LEASING:1,749 SF GROSS RES. AREA:12,222 SF CIRCULATION:1,155 SF NET RES. AREA:11,067 SF UNIT COUNT:16 UNITS PARKING/ SERVICES:79,905 SF 190-240 SPACES BASEMENT TOTAL PARKING: BUILDING AREA:92,387 SF MEP STORAGE:967 SF TRASH/LOADING:169 SF AMENITY:654 SF GROSS RES. AREA:24,842 SF CIRCULATION:2,113 SF NET RES. AREA:22,729 SF UNIT COUNT:32 UNITS PARKING/ SERVICES:65,755 SF 193 SPACESTOTAL PARKING: GROUND LEVEL BUILDING AREA:87,713 SF MEP STORAGE:1,174 SF TRASH/LOADING:162 SF AMENITY:12,966 SF GROSS RES. AREA:43,899 SF CIRCULATION:8,550 SF NET RES. AREA:35,349 SF UNIT COUNT:50 UNITS PARKING/ SERVICES:29,512 SF 87 SPACES LEVEL 2 TOTAL PARKING: BUILDING AREA:67,577 SF MEP STORAGE:816 SF TRASH/LOADING:182 SF GROSS RES. AREA:66,579 SF CIRCULATION:6,810 SF NET RES. AREA:59,769 SF UNIT COUNT:84 UNITS LEVELS 3-4 BUILDING AREA:39,144 SF MEP STORAGE:828 SF TRASH/LOADING:182 SF GROSS RES. AREA:38,134 SF CIRCULATION:3,847 SF NET RES. AREA:34,287 SF UNIT COUNT:48 UNITS LEVELS 5-6 BUILDING AREA:39,144 SF MEP STORAGE:828 SF TRASH/LOADING:182 SF AMENITY:733 SF GROSS RES. AREA:37,401 SF CIRCULATION:4,065 SF NET RES. AREA:33,336 SF UNIT COUNT:46 UNITS LEVEL 7 SOLHEM COMPANIES724 N 1st Street, Suite 500 Minneapolis, MN 55401 7TH FLOOR 74'-8" 6TH FLOOR 64'-0" 5TH FLOOR 53'-4" 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3-0 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (825.2 ELEV)P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (823.00 ELEV) ROOF 85'-4" 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (823.0 ELEV) 7TH FLOOR 74'-8" 6TH FLOOR 64'-0" 5TH FLOOR 53'-4" 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (823.00 ELEV) 7TH FLOOR 74'-8" 6TH FLOOR 64'-0" 5TH FLOOR 53'-4" 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (823.00 ELEV) 7TH FLOOR 74'-8" 6TH FLOOR 64'-0" 5TH FLOOR 53'-4" 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (823.00 ELEV) 7TH FLOOR 74'-8" 6TH FLOOR 64'-0" 5TH FLOOR 53'-4" 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (823.00 ELEV) 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (823.0 ELEV) 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (825.2 ELEV) ELEVATION GENERAL NOTES 1. P1 ELEVATION AT 823.0 BASED ON LOWEST ALLOWED ELEVATION PER FLOOD PLANE ELEVATION 2. LOWEST ALLOWED OPENINGS ON BUILDING TO BE AT 825.2 ELEVATION PER FLOOD PLANE ELEVATION 3. MAX BUILDING HEIGHT OF 85' BASED ON AVERAGE GRADE PLANE OF 829 4. COLORED ELEVATION SKIN KEYED BELOW - SEE ELEVATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES ELEVATION EXTERIOR SKIN KEY FACE BRICK PATTERNED PRECAST CONCRETE PANEL (NOTED ON ELEVS AT GARAGE AREAS ONLY) UTILITY FACE BRICK FIBER CEMENT PANEL FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING VERTICAL METAL PANEL WALL MOUNTED BUILDING SIGNAGE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING BY LICENSED SIGN CONTRACTOR - SEE ELEVATIONS FOR POTENTIAL LOCATIONS - SIZE AND QUANTITY TBD PER ZONING CODE FIBER CEMENT TRIM BAY VINYL WINDOWS TYPICAL (FIXED AND AWNING) FIBER CEMENT PANEL FACE BRICK W/ ACCENT BRICK BANDING PREFIN. ALUMINUM DECKS TYP. FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING W/ ACCENT TRIM BANDING FACEBRICK PATTERNED PRECAST PANEL 7TH FLOOR 74'-8" 6TH FLOOR 64'-0" 5TH FLOOR 53'-4" 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (823.00 ELEV) VINYL WINDOWS TYPICAL (FIXED AND AWNING) FIBER CEMENT PANEL VINYL SLIDING PATIO DOORS TYPICAL FACE BRICK W/ ACCENT BRICK BANDING PREFIN. ALUMINUM DECKS TYP. INSULATED O.H. GARAGE DOOR FACEBRICK PATTERNED PRECAST PANEL FIBER CEMENT PANEL ELEVATOR OVERRUN ROOF PATIO ACCESS FIBER CEMENT TRIM BAY FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING W/ TRIM ACCENT TRELLIS VERTICAL METAL PANEL FACEBRICK PATTERNED PRECAST PANEL FACEBRICK W/ ACCENT BRICK BANDING VINYL WINDOWS TYPICAL (FIXED AND AWNING) PORTE COCHERE FIBER CEMENT PANEL FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING COURTYARD ELEVATION (EAST FACING) NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION COURTYARD ELEVATION (WEST FACING) SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATIONTRELLIS & PERGOLA PORTE COCHERE POTENTIAL SIGNAGE LOCATIONS POTENTIAL SIGNAGE LOCATIONS POTENTIAL SIGNAGE LOCATION ENLARGED SIGNAGE ELEVATION ELEVATOR OVERRUN ROOF PATIO ACCESS FACEBRICK W/ ACCENT BRICK BANDINGFACEBRICK PATTERNED PRECAST PANEL VERTICAL METAL PANEL FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING W/ TRIM ACCENT FIBER CEMENT PANEL FIBER CEMENT PANEL FIBER CEMENT PANEL FACEBRICK W/ ACCENT BRICK BANDING FIBER CEMENT TRIM BAY VINYL SLIDING PATIO DOORS TYPICAL VINYL WINDOWS TYPICAL (FIXED AND AWNING) VINYL SLIDING PATIO DOORS TYPICAL FACEBRICK W/ ACCENT BRICK BANDING TRELLIS & PERGOLA FIBER CEMENT PANEL SOLHEM COMPANIES724 N 1st Street, Suite 500 Minneapolis, MN 55401 UTILITY BRICK VENEER FIBER CEMENT PANEL SIDING VERTICAL METAL PANEL VINYL WINDOW FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING PRECAST PANEL BRICK PATTERN * VARIED COLOR EXPOSURE HUNG ALUMINUM BALCONY FIXED AWNING * TO MATCH UTILITY BRICK VENEER VINYL SLIDING DOOR Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2021 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2395-03 Pentagon Park/2395-03 Pentagon Park_DESIGN_2021.rvt4/26/2021 10:39:35 AMAuthor Checker 2395-03 EX-1 EXTERIOR MATERIALS PENTAGON PARK APARTMENTS ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION SOLHEM COMPANIES724 N 1st Street, Suite 500Minneapolis, MN 55401 A3-1 Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2021 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE ULTANTS CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2395-03 Pentagon Park/2395-03 Pentagon Park_DESIGN_2021.rvt4/26/2021 9:34:22 AMAuthor Checker 2395-03 EX-3 RENDERINGS PENTAGON PARK APARTMENTS ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION VIEW FROM 77TH VIEW FROM THE PARK AERIAL LOOKING SOUTH A1-0 SOLHEM COMPANIES724 N 1st Street, Suite 500 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Edina - Pentagon Park 4/26/2021 Unit Type Total Lobby/Leasing Amenity MEP & Services Loading& Trash Parking Area Parking Count Gross Building Area GRSF NRSF Efficiency Area (SF)(NRSF / (GROSS BLDG − PARKING)) 12 4 0 16 1,749 1,786 950 969 79,905 190-240 97,581 12,222 11,067 62.61% 24 8 0 32 654 967 169 65,755 193 92,387 24,842 22,729 85.34% 39 10 1 50 12,966 1,174 162 29,512 87 87,713 43,899 35,349 60.74% 2 66 16 2 84 816 182 67,577 66,579 59,769 88.45% 2 38 8 2 48 828 182 39,144 38,134 34,287 87.59% 36 8 2 46 733 828 182 39,144 37,401 33,336 85.16% 319 78 11 408 1,749 16,139 6,379 2,028 175,172 470-520 530,267 327,790 290,593 81.8% 1.00 Per Unit 2.00 Per Unit 3.00 Per Unit 319 Stalls 156 Stalls 33 Stalls 508 520-570 470-520 50 Total Unit 408 236,950 Site Area 5.44 Acres Bed Count 75.0 Density =Total units / Acreage NRSF by Type 290,593 0.39 Lot Coverage =Ground Floor/Site Area NRSF Ave. unit 712 355,095 GFA =Gross Bldg Area - Parking Area Unit Mix 1.50 FAR =GFA / Site Area Unit per Type Parking Ratio Parking Required Surface parking Total Parking Provided 319 33 Tabulations B Level 1 BEDROOM 3 BEDROOMS Amenities & Support2 BEDROOMS 78.2%2.7% G 2 Parking Garage 5-6 3-4 7 156 19.1% Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2021 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE NSULTANTS CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2395-03 Pentagon Park/2395-03 Pentagon Park_DESIGN_2021.rvt4/22/2021 1:38:06 PMAuthor Checker 2395-03 EX-2 EXISTING PHOTOS PENTAGON PARK APARTMENTS 1 1 & 22 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3 45 & 678 9 10VIEW LEGEND ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION N A1-1 SOLHEM COMPANIES724 N 1st Street, Suite 500Minneapolis, MN 55401 RESIDENTIAL UNITS 7TH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN STAIR ROOF BELOW ROOF BELOW 5TH - 6TH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN3RD - 4TH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 2ND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN1ST LEVEL FLOOR PLANP1 LEVEL FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLANS A2-0 ROOF BELOW ROOF BELOW ROOF BELOW RESIDENTIAL UNITSRESIDENTIAL UNITS STAIRSTAIR STAIR STAIR STAIR STOR.STOR.STOR.STOR.STOR.STOR. M T M T M TM T M T M T M TELEVATORSELEVATORSELEVATORS RESIDENTIAL UNITS PLAZA DECK PLAZA DECK PUB GUEST SUITE COWORKLOUNGELOUNGEOPEN TO BELOW CONF. FITNESS WEIGHT ROOM FITNESS YOGA GAME ROOM PLAZA DECK GARAGE ENTRY RESIDENTIAL UNITS RESIDENTIAL UNITS RESIDENTIAL UNITS RESIDENTIAL UNITS RESIDENTIAL UNITS RESIDENTIAL UNITS RESIDENTIAL UNITS CLUB ROOM SAUNA POOL MECH RAMP DN.RAMP DN.RAMP UPMECH STOR. M TSTAIR HALF STORY USE TBD OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW MECH RESIDENTIAL UNITS MECH TRASH LOBBY LEASE MAIL PACK.TRASH BIKE CAFE 8% RAMP MECH RAMP UPREFLECTING POOLEXT. METAL GRATE STAIR AMENITY 0 40 80 N COLORED, PATTERNED ROCK BALLASTED ROOF 388'-8"184'-0"65'- 0"65'-0"65'-0"177'-0"402'-0"AMENITY 40'-0"131'-10"65'-0"86'-10"65'-0" STAIR STAIR STAIR STAIR STAIR STAIR STAIRSTAIRSTAIRSTAIRSTAIRSTAIR ELEVATORS ELEVATOR ELEVATORS201'-8"ELEVATOR ELEVATOR ELEVATOR ELEVATOR ELEVATOR ELEVATOR ELEVATOR ELEVATORS8'-0"22'-0"OPTIONAL PARKING AREA (BASED ON FEASIBILITY) BUILDING AREA:97,581 SF MEP STORAGE:950 SF TRASH/LOADING:969 SF AMENITY:1,786 SF LOBBY/LEASING:1,749 SF GROSS RES. AREA:12,222 SF CIRCULATION:1,155 SF NET RES. AREA:11,067 SF UNIT COUNT:16 UNITS PARKING/ SERVICES:79,905 SF 190-240 SPACES BASEMENT TOTAL PARKING: BUILDING AREA:92,387 SF MEP STORAGE:967 SF TRASH/LOADING:169 SF AMENITY:654 SF GROSS RES. AREA:24,842 SF CIRCULATION:2,113 SF NET RES. AREA:22,729 SF UNIT COUNT:32 UNITS PARKING/ SERVICES:65,755 SF 193 SPACESTOTAL PARKING: GROUND LEVEL BUILDING AREA:87,713 SF MEP STORAGE:1,174 SF TRASH/LOADING:162 SF AMENITY:12,966 SF GROSS RES. AREA:43,899 SF CIRCULATION:8,550 SF NET RES. AREA:35,349 SF UNIT COUNT:50 UNITS PARKING/ SERVICES:29,512 SF 87 SPACES LEVEL 2 TOTAL PARKING: BUILDING AREA:67,577 SF MEP STORAGE:816 SF TRASH/LOADING:182 SF GROSS RES. AREA:66,579 SF CIRCULATION:6,810 SF NET RES. AREA:59,769 SF UNIT COUNT:84 UNITS LEVELS 3-4 BUILDING AREA:39,144 SF MEP STORAGE:828 SF TRASH/LOADING:182 SF GROSS RES. AREA:38,134 SF CIRCULATION:3,847 SF NET RES. AREA:34,287 SF UNIT COUNT:48 UNITS LEVELS 5-6 BUILDING AREA:39,144 SF MEP STORAGE:828 SF TRASH/LOADING:182 SF AMENITY:733 SF GROSS RES. AREA:37,401 SF CIRCULATION:4,065 SF NET RES. AREA:33,336 SF UNIT COUNT:46 UNITS LEVEL 7 SOLHEM COMPANIES724 N 1st Street, Suite 500 Minneapolis, MN 55401 7TH FLOOR 74'-8" 6TH FLOOR 64'-0" 5TH FLOOR 53'-4" 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3-0 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (825.2 ELEV)P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (823.00 ELEV) ROOF 85'-4" 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (823.0 ELEV) 7TH FLOOR 74'-8" 6TH FLOOR 64'-0" 5TH FLOOR 53'-4" 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (823.00 ELEV) 7TH FLOOR 74'-8" 6TH FLOOR 64'-0" 5TH FLOOR 53'-4" 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (823.00 ELEV) 7TH FLOOR 74'-8" 6TH FLOOR 64'-0" 5TH FLOOR 53'-4" 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (823.00 ELEV) 7TH FLOOR 74'-8" 6TH FLOOR 64'-0" 5TH FLOOR 53'-4" 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (823.00 ELEV) 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (823.0 ELEV) 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (825.2 ELEV) ELEVATION GENERAL NOTES 1. P1 ELEVATION AT 823.0 BASED ON LOWEST ALLOWED ELEVATION PER FLOOD PLANE ELEVATION 2. LOWEST ALLOWED OPENINGS ON BUILDING TO BE AT 825.2 ELEVATION PER FLOOD PLANE ELEVATION 3. MAX BUILDING HEIGHT OF 85' BASED ON AVERAGE GRADE PLANE OF 829 4. COLORED ELEVATION SKIN KEYED BELOW - SEE ELEVATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES ELEVATION EXTERIOR SKIN KEY FACE BRICK PATTERNED PRECAST CONCRETE PANEL (NOTED ON ELEVS AT GARAGE AREAS ONLY) UTILITY FACE BRICK FIBER CEMENT PANEL FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING VERTICAL METAL PANEL WALL MOUNTED BUILDING SIGNAGE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING BY LICENSED SIGN CONTRACTOR - SEE ELEVATIONS FOR POTENTIAL LOCATIONS - SIZE AND QUANTITY TBD PER ZONING CODE FIBER CEMENT TRIM BAY VINYL WINDOWS TYPICAL (FIXED AND AWNING) FIBER CEMENT PANEL FACE BRICK W/ ACCENT BRICK BANDING PREFIN. ALUMINUM DECKS TYP. FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING W/ ACCENT TRIM BANDING FACEBRICK PATTERNED PRECAST PANEL 7TH FLOOR 74'-8" 6TH FLOOR 64'-0" 5TH FLOOR 53'-4" 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (823.00 ELEV) VINYL WINDOWS TYPICAL (FIXED AND AWNING) FIBER CEMENT PANEL VINYL SLIDING PATIO DOORS TYPICAL FACE BRICK W/ ACCENT BRICK BANDING PREFIN. ALUMINUM DECKS TYP. INSULATED O.H. GARAGE DOOR FACEBRICK PATTERNED PRECAST PANEL FIBER CEMENT PANEL ELEVATOR OVERRUN ROOF PATIO ACCESS FIBER CEMENT TRIM BAY FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING W/ TRIM ACCENT TRELLIS VERTICAL METAL PANEL FACEBRICK PATTERNED PRECAST PANEL FACEBRICK W/ ACCENT BRICK BANDING VINYL WINDOWS TYPICAL (FIXED AND AWNING) PORTE COCHERE FIBER CEMENT PANEL FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING COURTYARD ELEVATION (EAST FACING) NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION COURTYARD ELEVATION (WEST FACING) SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATIONTRELLIS & PERGOLA PORTE COCHERE POTENTIAL SIGNAGE LOCATIONS POTENTIAL SIGNAGE LOCATIONS POTENTIAL SIGNAGE LOCATION ENLARGED SIGNAGE ELEVATION ELEVATOR OVERRUN ROOF PATIO ACCESS FACEBRICK W/ ACCENT BRICK BANDINGFACEBRICK PATTERNED PRECAST PANEL VERTICAL METAL PANEL FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING W/ TRIM ACCENT FIBER CEMENT PANEL FIBER CEMENT PANEL FIBER CEMENT PANEL FACEBRICK W/ ACCENT BRICK BANDING FIBER CEMENT TRIM BAY VINYL SLIDING PATIO DOORS TYPICAL VINYL WINDOWS TYPICAL (FIXED AND AWNING) VINYL SLIDING PATIO DOORS TYPICAL FACEBRICK W/ ACCENT BRICK BANDING TRELLIS & PERGOLA FIBER CEMENT PANEL SOLHEM COMPANIES724 N 1st Street, Suite 500 Minneapolis, MN 55401 UTILITY BRICK VENEER FIBER CEMENT PANEL SIDING VERTICAL METAL PANEL VINYL WINDOW FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING PRECAST PANEL BRICK PATTERN * VARIED COLOR EXPOSURE HUNG ALUMINUM BALCONY FIXED AWNING * TO MATCH UTILITY BRICK VENEER VINYL SLIDING DOOR Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2021 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2395-03 Pentagon Park/2395-03 Pentagon Park_DESIGN_2021.rvt4/26/2021 10:39:35 AMAuthor Checker 2395-03 EX-1 EXTERIOR MATERIALS PENTAGON PARK APARTMENTS ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION SOLHEM COMPANIES724 N 1st Street, Suite 500Minneapolis, MN 55401 A3-1 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:21105............04/30/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/30/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC0.0TITLE SHEET............PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIALEDINA, MINNESOTASHEET INDEXSHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEC0.0TITLE SHEETSITE SURVEYV1.0UTILITY PLANC4.0ISSUED FOR: CITY SUBMITTALSWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONSSW1.0GRADING PLANC3.0C5.0C5.1CIVIL DETAILSSWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONSSW1.1SWPPP - DETAILSSW1.2C2.0SITE PLANSWPPP - NARRATIVESW1.3CIVIL DETAILSC1.0REMOVALS PLANC5.2CIVIL DETAILSKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRSWPPP - ATTACHMENTSSW1.4SWPPP - ATTACHMENTSSW1.5DEVELOPER / PROPERTY OWNER:SOLHEM COMPANIES724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONTACT: CURT GUNSBURY612-598-9416ENGINEER:CIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35TH STREETSUITE 200ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416612-615-0060SURVEYOR:GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER:BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION11001 HAMPSHIRE AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55438CONTACT: GERARD HAHN952-995-2000ARCHITECT / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:BKV GROUP222 N 2ND STSUITE 101MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONTACT: MATHEW H. NUGENT612-339-3752SUNDE LAND SURVEYING9001 E BLOOMINGTON FWY, SUITE 118BLOOMINGTON, MN 55420-3435CONTACT: LEONARD CARLSONSITE LOCATION MAPNSITE LOCATIONALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN AREAPPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL"(651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS,48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THECONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIESTHAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NOCOST TO THE OWNER.C5.3CIVIL DETAILS REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONV1.0SITE SURVEY............ CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONST.LIMITSREMOVE EX BUILDING, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, FOOTINGS& BASE MATERIALS, PER LOCAL STATE & FEDERAL STANDARDS.REMOVE/DISCONNECT ALL SERVICES & UTILITIES PER UTILITYCOMPANY AND/OR L.G.U. STANDARDSREMOVE EXISTINGLIGHT POLE, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT ANDBASE MATERIAL, PARKING SIGNS,BOLLARDS, LIGHT POLES, ETC., TYP.REMOVE EXISTING TREESAND ROOT BALLS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING CURBAND GUTTER, SAWCUTFULL DEPTH, TYP.REMOVE ALL EXISTINGUTILITY SERVICES PERUTILITY COMPANY ANDCITY STANDARDSEXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.EXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING TREESAND ROOT BALLS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT AND BASE MATERIAL,CONCRETE CURB, WALLS, WALK, & STAIRS, UTILITYMANHOLES, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, LIGHT POLES,LANDSCAPED AREA, AND PARKING SIGNS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENTAND BASE MATERIAL ANDPARKING SIGNS, TYP.REMOVE EX BUILDING, STRUCTURES,FOUNDATIONS, FOOTINGS & BASEMATERIALS, PER LOCAL STATE &FEDERAL STANDARDS.REMOVE/DISCONNECT ALL SERVICES& UTILITIES PER UTILITY COMPANYAND/OR L.G.U. STANDARDSREMOVE EXISTING CURBAND GUTTER, SAWCUTFULL DEPTH, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING CURBAND GUTTER, SAWCUTFULL DEPTH, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGCURB AND GUTTER,TYP.REMOVE EXISTING UTILITYSERVICES PER CITY STANDARDSREMOVE EXISTINGUTILITY SERVICES PERCITY STANDARDSREMOVE EXISTING HYDRANTAND VALVE, COORD. W/ CITYREMOVE EXISTING UTILITYSERVICES PER CITY STANDARDSREMOVE EXISTING LANDSCAPING,SHRUBS, BUSHES, AND ROOTBALLS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGLANDSCAPING,SHRUBS, BUSHES,TREES AND ROOTBALLS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING STORMCB AND PARTIAL PIPE TOPROPERTY LINE, PLUGEXISTING HYDRANT TO REMAIN, PROTECTFROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION.REMOVE EXISTING UNDERGROUND TANKPER LOCAL STATE & FEDERAL STANDARDSEXISTING BUILDINGTO REMAIN,PROTECT FROMDAMAGE DURINGCONSTRUCTION.EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE WITHINPROPERTY LINE TO REMAIN, PROTECTFROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION.EXISTING CURB TO REMAIN, PROTECTFROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION.REMOVE EXISTING SIGN,COORD. W/ OWNERREMOVE EXISTING SIGN,COORD. W/ OWNEREXISTING SIGN TO REMAIN,PROTECT FROM DAMAGEDURING CONSTRUCTION.SAWCUT FULLDEPTH, TYP.SAWCUT FULLDEPTH, TYP.SAWCUT FULLDEPTH, TYP.SAWCUT FULLDEPTH, FOR CURBMEDIANS, TYP.SAWCUT FULLDEPTH, FOR CURBMEDIANS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGLANDSCAPING,TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGPARTIAL WATERMAINSERVICE PER CITYSTANDARDSREMOVE EXISTING STORMCB AND PARTIAL PIPE TOPROPERTY LINE, PLUGREMOVE EX BUILDING, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, FOOTINGS& BASE MATERIALS, PER LOCAL STATE & FEDERAL STANDARDS.REMOVE/DISCONNECT ALL SERVICES & UTILITIES PER UTILITYCOMPANY AND/OR L.G.U. STANDARDSREMOVE EXISTINGLIGHT POLE, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT ANDBASE MATERIAL, PARKING SIGNS,BOLLARDS, LIGHT POLES, ETC., TYP.REMOVE EXISTING TREESAND ROOT BALLS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING CURBAND GUTTER, SAWCUTFULL DEPTH, TYP.REMOVE ALL EXISTINGUTILITY SERVICES PERUTILITY COMPANY ANDCITY STANDARDSEXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.EXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING TREESAND ROOT BALLS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT AND BASE MATERIAL,CONCRETE CURB, WALLS, WALK, & STAIRS, UTILITYMANHOLES, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, LIGHT POLES,LANDSCAPED AREA, AND PARKING SIGNS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENTAND BASE MATERIAL ANDPARKING SIGNS, TYP.REMOVE EX BUILDING, STRUCTURES,FOUNDATIONS, FOOTINGS & BASEMATERIALS, PER LOCAL STATE &FEDERAL STANDARDS.REMOVE/DISCONNECT ALL SERVICES& UTILITIES PER UTILITY COMPANYAND/OR L.G.U. STANDARDSREMOVE EXISTING CURBAND GUTTER, SAWCUTFULL DEPTH, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING CURBAND GUTTER, SAWCUTFULL DEPTH, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGCURB AND GUTTER,TYP.REMOVE EXISTING UTILITYSERVICES PER CITY STANDARDSREMOVE EXISTINGUTILITY SERVICES PERCITY STANDARDSREMOVE EXISTING HYDRANTAND VALVE, COORD. W/ CITYREMOVE EXISTING UTILITYSERVICES PER CITY STANDARDSREMOVE EXISTING LANDSCAPING,SHRUBS, BUSHES, AND ROOTBALLS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGLANDSCAPING,SHRUBS, BUSHES,TREES AND ROOTBALLS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING STORMCB AND PARTIAL PIPE TOPROPERTY LINE, PLUGEXISTING HYDRANT TO REMAIN, PROTECTFROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION.REMOVE EXISTING UNDERGROUND TANKPER LOCAL STATE & FEDERAL STANDARDSEXISTING BUILDINGTO REMAIN,PROTECT FROMDAMAGE DURINGCONSTRUCTION.EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE WITHINPROPERTY LINE TO REMAIN, PROTECTFROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION.EXISTING CURB TO REMAIN, PROTECTFROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION.REMOVE EXISTING SIGN,COORD. W/ OWNERREMOVE EXISTING SIGN,COORD. W/ OWNEREXISTING SIGN TO REMAIN,PROTECT FROM DAMAGEDURING CONSTRUCTION.SAWCUT FULLDEPTH, TYP.SAWCUT FULLDEPTH, TYP.SAWCUT FULLDEPTH, TYP.SAWCUT FULLDEPTH, FOR CURBMEDIANS, TYP.SAWCUT FULLDEPTH, FOR CURBMEDIANS, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGLANDSCAPING,TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGPARTIAL WATERMAINSERVICE PER CITYSTANDARDSREMOVE EXISTING STORMCB AND PARTIAL PIPE TOPROPERTY LINE, PLUGREMOVALS LEGEND:TREE PROTECTIONREMOVAL OF PAVEMENT AND ALL BASE MATERIAL,INCLUDING BIT., CONC., AND GRAVEL PVMTS.REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE INCLUDING ALLFOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS.TREE REMOVAL - INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPS4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:21105............04/30/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/30/2101" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC1.0REMOVALS PLAN............Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallREX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALREMOVE CURB AND GUTTER. IF IN RIGHT-OF-WAY,COORDINATE WITH LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT.REMOVAL NOTES:1.SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORM WATERMANAGEMENT PLAN.2.REMOVAL OF MATERIALS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT, STATE AND LOCALREGULATIONS.3.REMOVAL OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTIONACTIVITIES.4.EXISTING PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR THE NEAREST JOINTFOR PROPOSED PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS.5.REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF TO A LEGAL OFF-SITE LOCATION AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATEAND LOCAL REGULATIONS.6.ABANDON, REMOVAL, CONNECTION, AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE.COORDINATE WITH PROPOSED PLANS.7.EXISTING ON-SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OFTHE CONTRACT.8.PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE CONSIDERED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THEDRAWINGS. WORK WITHIN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL INCLUDE STAGING, DEMOLITION ANDCLEAN-UP OPERATIONS AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.9.MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWN ON THE PLANAND PER CITY REQUIREMENTS.10.DAMAGE BEYOND THE PROPERTY LIMITS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE REPAIRED IN A MANNERAPPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY.11.PROPOSED WORK (BUILDING AND CIVIL) SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ONTHE DRAWINGS AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.12.SITE SECURITY MAY BE NECESSARY AND PROVIDED IN A MANNER TO PROHIBIT VANDALISM, AND THEFT, DURINGAND AFTER NORMAL WORK HOURS, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. SECURITY MATERIALSSHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY.13.VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTION ACCESS DURINGNORMAL OPERATING HOURS. AT NO POINT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT SHALL CIRCULATIONOF ADJACENT STREETS BE BLOCKED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.14.ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTAMANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BELIMITED TO, SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALLREMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THECITY.15.SHORING FOR BUILDING EXCAVATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND ASAPPROVED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.16.STAGING, DEMOLITION, AND CLEAN-UP AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THEDRAWINGS AND MAINTAINED IN A MANNER AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.17.ALL EXISTING SITE TRAFFIC/REGULATORY SIGNAGE TO BE INVENTORIED AND IF REMOVED FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHALL BE RETURNED TO LGU.18.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL"(651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THECONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NOCOST TO THE OWNER.CITY OF EDINA REMOVAL NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5EROSION CONTROL NOTES: GUESTSUITEPUBCOWORK LOUNGE CONF.FITNESSWEIGHTROOMFITNESSYOGAGAME ROOMSAUNAPOOLCLUB ROOMRAMPDNMECH.326C TANDEM4 C19C587 STALLS57 C6RESIDENTIAL UNITSRESIDENTIAL UNITSRESIDENTIAL UNITS3CNOPARKING12187754332435' BUILDING SETBACK35' BUILDING SETBACK35' BUILDING SETBACK20' BUILDING SETBACKCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONST.LIMITS55.7'56.2'86.7'76.7'43.8'55.7'9.0'40.0'20.0'TYP.9.0' TYP.5.3'8.5'TYP.6.3'20.0'5.7'20.0'7.3'22.0'5.1'5.0'5.0'8.5' TYP.8.9'46.6'18.6'26.4'28.3'16.8'13.3'10.0'9.0'TYP.55.7'51.7'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R100.0'R78.0'R3.0'R6.0'R3.0'R8.0'R100.0'R3.0'R10.0'R10.0'R10.0'R7.0'R8.0'R3.0'R3.0 'R3.0'R3. 0 ' R 3 6 . 0 ' R20 . 0 'R4.0'R4.0'R4 . 0 'R4.0'R 4 . 0 'R4.0'R8.0'R3.0'R 3 . 0 'ACCESSIBLE PARKINGSPACE, INCL.SIGNAGE, STRIPINGAND RAMPSM.D. BIT.PVMT., TYPPVMT.STRIPINGTYP.CONCRETE DRIVEWAYAPRON PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.REMOVE AND REPLACEEXISTING PAVEMENT ANDBASE MATERIAL TO MATCHEXISTING PAVEMENT SECTIONFOR UTILITY CONSTRUCTIONCONCRETE SIDEWALKPER CITY STANDARDS,TYP.B612 C&G, TYP.M.D. BIT.PVMT., TYPB612 C&G,TYP.B612 C&G,TYP.B612 C&G,TYP.PVMT. STRIPINGTYP.CONCRETE SIDEWALKPER CITY STANDARDS,TYP.CONCRETE DRIVEWAYAPRON PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.REMOVE AND REPLACEEXISTING PAVEMENT ANDBASE MATERIAL TO MATCHEXISTING PAVEMENT SECTIONFOR UTILITY CONSTRUCTION3' CURBTAPERMATCHEX. C&GMATCHMATCHMATCHMATCHB612 C&G,TYP.B612C&G,TYP.L.D. BIT.PVMT., TYPPVMT.STRIPINGTYP.CONC. WALK, TYPCONC. WALK, TYPCONC. WALK, TYPCONC. WALK, TYPBITUMINOUS PATH, TYPPICKLE BALL COURT,SEE ARCH'L PLANSFOR DETAILSWOOD DECK BRIDGE,SEE ARCH'L PLANSRETAINING WALLS, SEEGRADING PLAN FOR WALLELEVATIONS, SEE ARCH'LPLANS FOR DETAILSRETAINING WALLS, SEEGRADING PLAN FOR WALLELEVATIONS, SEE ARCH'LPLANS FOR DETAILSRETAINING WALLS, SEEGRADING PLAN FOR WALLELEVATIONS, SEE ARCH'LPLANS FOR DETAILSRETAINING WALLS, SEEGRADING PLAN FOR WALLELEVATIONS, SEE ARCH'LPLANS FOR DETAILSPLAZA DECK WITH RETAINING WALLS,SEE ARCH'L PLANS FOR DETAILSPLAZA DECK WITH RETAINING WALLS,SEE ARCH'L PLANS FOR DETAILSCONC. STAIRS,SEE ARCH'L PLANSFOR DETAILSCONC. STAIRS,SEE ARCH'L PLANSFOR DETAILSCONC. STAIRS,SEE ARCH'L PLANSFOR DETAILSCONC. STAIRS,SEE ARCH'L PLANSFOR DETAILSCONC. STAIRS,SEE ARCH'L PLANSFOR DETAILSCONC. WALK, TYPL.D. BIT.PVMT., TYPL.D. BIT.PVMT., TYPL.D. BIT.PVMT., TYPPLAZA DECK WITHRETAINING WALLS,SEE ARCH'L PLANSFOR DETAILSM.D. BIT.PVMT., TYPPATIO, SEE ARCH'LPLANS FOR DETAILSDOG RUN AREA,SEE ARCH'L PLANSFOR DETAILSSEE LANDSCAPINGPLAN, BY OTHERSCONC. STAIRS,SEE ARCH'L PLANSFOR DETAILSCONC. WALK, TYPCONC. PAVEMENT3' CURBTAPER3' CURBTAPERRIBBONCURB3' CURBTAPER22.0'MATCHEX. C&GMATCHEX. C&GMATCHEX. C&GMATCHEX. C&GMATCHACCESSIBLE ROUTEARROW. DO NOT PAINT,FOR CODE REVIEW ONLY,TYP.PERMEABLEPAVEMENTAREAS, TYP. SEEDETAIL.16.0' 12.2' 6.0'4.0' 16.0'11.5'8.0'44.0'5.7'18.0'TYP.22.0'4.7'8.0'24.0'5.7'9.0'TYP.22.0'18.0'TYP.4.7'20.0'TYP.9.0'TYP.22.0'18.0'TYP.4.7'20.0'TYP.2.9'5.0'29.8'6.0'14.8'18.0'TYP.24.0'8.3'18.0'TYP.24.0'10.1'18.0'TYP.24.0'8.9'18.0' 24.3'35.6'24.6'35.4'22.6'8.0'8.4'8.0'16.0'13.1'6.0'4.0'8.0'44.0'TOP=821.00EOF=820.80SITE 100-YR HWL=823.203:1 SIDE SLOPESMIN. BOTTOM AREA=5800 SF4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:21105............04/30/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/30/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.0SITE PLAN............SITE AREA TABLE:1.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNINGCONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES,EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINALLOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OFCONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TOOWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIORTO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING ARIGHT-OF-WAY AND STREET OPENING PERMIT.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TOINSTALLATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKE FORREVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS.5.LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS AREAPPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BYTHE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.6.CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETEFOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BYTHE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENTMATERIALS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS,BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNER RESERVES THERIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED.8.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCEWITH A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS-SEE DETAIL.9.CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TOTHE FLOW OF TRAFFIC. WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BEWHITE IN COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES.10.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND GUTTER TYPE. TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES-SEE DETAIL.11.ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.12.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TOSITE IMPROVEMENTS.13.FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS.14.PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.15.ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP.16.BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENTSECTIONS.17.ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THEDRIP LINE. SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS.18.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL"(651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THECONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NOCOST TO THE OWNER.SITE LAYOUT NOTES:SITE PLAN LEGEND:TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGSCITY OF EDINA SITE SPECIFIC NOTES:SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED.HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGNNP = NO PARKING FIRE LANEST = STOPCP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"N1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC NOTES.Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCONCRETE PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) ASSPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK) SEE GEOTECHNICALREPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & CONCRETEDEPTHS, SEE DETAIL.PROPERTY LINECURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUTGUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLANLIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE).SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE& WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DEATIL.MEDIUM DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE).SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE &WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DETAIL.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSTOSPECIALTY PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) - PROVIDE BIDFOR THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS, INCLUDE VARIATIONSOF BASE MATERIAL AND OTHER NECESSARYCOMPONENTS.1. STAMPED & COLORED CONCRETE2. CONCRETE PAVERSMAKERS, COLORS, MODELS, & PATTERN TO BEINCLUDED IN SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTAL PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.OPERATIONAL NOTES:SNOW REMOVAL:ALL SNOW SHALL BE STORED ON-SITE AT OUTSIDE EDGES OF PARKING LOT. WHEN THOSEAREAS ARE FULL, SNOW REMOVAL COMPANY WILL REMOVE TO OFFSITE LOCATIONTRASH REMOVAL:TRASH SHALL BE COLLECTED IN INTERIOR COLLECTION AREA AND STAGED OUTSIDE,WHERE DESIGNATED, ON DAY OF PICK-UP BY BUILDING PERSONNEL. PICK-UP SHALL BE BYCOMMERCIAL REFUSE AND RECYCLING HAULER COMPANY.DELIVERIES:DELIVERIES SHALL OCCUR AT THE MAIN ENTRANCE VIA STANDARD COMMERCIAL DELIVERYVEHICLES (UPS, FED EX, USPS). MOVE-IN/OUT OPERATIONS MAY BE STAGED AT OTHEREGRESS LOCATIONS WITH COORDINATION AND OPERATIONS ORGANIZED BY BUILDINGSTAFF, INCLUDING TRAFFIC CONTROL, AS REQUIRED.ACCESSIBILITY ARROW (IF APPLICABLE) DO NOTPAINT.PERVIOUS PAVEMENT - INCLUDE ALL BASE MATERIALAND APPURTENANCES AS SPECIFIED PERMANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS & INSTRUCTIONS.MAKE: T.B.D.MODEL: T.B.D.COLOR: T.B.D. - PROVIDE SAMPLES, SHOP DRAWINGS & PRODUCT DATA REQUIRED PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION. GUESTSUITEPUBCOWORK LOUNGE CONF.FITNESSWEIGHTROOMFITNESSYOGAGAME ROOMSAUNAPOOLCLUB ROOMRAMPDNMECH.326C TANDEM4 C19C587 STALLS57 C6RESIDENTIAL UNITSRESIDENTIAL UNITSRESIDENTIAL UNITS3CNOPARKING35' BUILDING SETBACK35' BUILDING SETBACK35' BUILDING SETBACK20' BUILDING SETBACKCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONST.LIMITS4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:21105............04/30/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/30/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC3.0GRADING PLAN............1.SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT & GENERAL GRADING NOTES.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SITEPREPARATION, SOIL CORRECTION, EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, ETC.) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTSOF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONSWITH THE SOILS ENGINEER.3.GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTIONDISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS & PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY.ALLEXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLREPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.4.PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW-LINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.5.GRADES OF WALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 5% MAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1% MIN. AND 2% MAX. CROSSSLOPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.6.PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. MAXIMUMSLOPES IN MAINTAINED AREAS IS 4:17.PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, FREESTANDING WALLS, OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES GREATER THAN 4' INHEIGHT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING WALL ENGINEER. DESIGNDRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATIONOF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AFINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOTOPSOIL AND SODDING ACTIVITIES.9.IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALL EXCESS SOILMATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO AN AREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THESITE.10.EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREASDESIGNATED ON THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR RESPREADING ON THESITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN EMBANKMENT AREAS, OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS,ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUT CUT AREAS, WHERE TURF IS TO BEESTABLISHED, TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TOA MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES.11.FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITSOF GRADING, INCLUDING ADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHINSPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARESHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADED SHALL BEPROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALL AREAS THATHAVE BECOME RUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALLAREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO EQUAL OR BETTER THANORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORK.12.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND/ORPARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSSWEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BECOMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICHSECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BECOMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. NO TEST ROLL SHALL OCCURWITHIN 10' OF ANY UNDERGROUND STORM RETENTION/DETENTION SYSTEMS.13. TOLERANCES13.1.THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.30 FOOTABOVE, OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE.13.2.THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHEREMEASUREMENT IS MADE.13.3.AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW THEREQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER.13.4.TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS.14.MAINTENANCE14.1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND EROSION, AND KEEP AREAFREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS.14.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED, ERODED AND RUTTED AREAS TOSPECIFIED TOLERANCES. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED, AND DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD,ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED SHALL BE RESEEDED AND MULCHED.14.3.WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONSOR ADVERSE WEATHER, CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE, AND COMPACT TO REQUIREDDENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION.GENERAL GRADING NOTES:1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALGRADING PLAN LEGEND:SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTERSPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURBSPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRSGROUNDWATER INFORMATION:CITY OF EDINA GRADING NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC GRADING NOTES.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5EROSION CONTROL NOTES:01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallREX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINEUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)CURB AND GUTTER (T.O = TIP OUT)EMERGENCY OVERFLOWEOF=1135.52TOPER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY XXXXX, INC., DATED XX-XX-XX GROUNDWATER WASOBSERVED AT ELEVATIONS RANGING FROM XXX.XX TO XXX.XXTHE BORINGS & GROUNDWATER ARE AS FOLLOWS:SB-1XXX.XXSB-2XXX.XXSB-3XXX.XXSB-4XXX.XXPROPOSED FOOTING DRAIN TILE INVERT ELEVATION = XXX.XXSPOT GRADE ELEVATION MATCH EXISTINGGRADE BREAK - HIGH POINTS GUESTSUITEPUBCOWORK LOUNGE CONF.FITNESSWEIGHTROOMFITNESSYOGAGAME ROOMSAUNAPOOLCLUB ROOMRAMPDNMECH.326C TANDEM4 C19C587 STALLS57 C6RESIDENTIAL UNITSRESIDENTIAL UNITSRESIDENTIAL UNITS3CNOPARKING35' BUILDING SETBACK35' BUILDING SETBACK35' BUILDING SETBACK20' BUILDING SETBACKCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONST.LIMITSSTUB 8" SANITARY TO5' FROM BUILDINGIE @ STUB=813.15COORD. W/ MECH'L82 LF 8" PVC SDR 26SANITARY SERVICE@ 2.00%MAKE CONNECTION TO EXISTING12" TRUSS SANITARY SEWEREX IE (E/W)=811.51(FIELD VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION)PROP IE (N)=811.51COORD. W/ CITYSTUB 8" COMBINED DIP WATERSERVICE AND VALVE, STUB TOWITHIN 5' FROM BUILDING,COORD. W/ MECH'LPROPOSED GATEVALVE & VALVE BOXMAKE WET TAP CONNECTION TOEXISTING 8" CIP WATER MAIN,(FIELD VERIFY LOCATION PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION)COORD. W/ CITYEXISTINGHYDRANTHYD &GV, TYP.HYD &GV, TYP.MAKE WET TAP CONNECTION TOEXISTING 8" CIP WATER MAIN,(FIELD VERIFY LOCATION PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION)COORD. W/ CITY8" DIPWATERMAIN10" DIP WATERMAIN8" DIPWATERMAIN10"X6"TEE45° BEND8"X6" TEEMAKE CONNECTIONTO EX. 8" DIP(FIELD VERIFY SIZEAND LOCATION)45° BENDPROPOSED GATEVALVE & VALVE BOX10"X8"TEE10" TO 8"REDUCER10"PLUGPROP. FDC LOCATIONRAINWATER REUSE/IRRIGATION CISTERN(2) 65 LF ROWS OF 60" DUAL WALL PP PIPEW/ STONE SEPARATION, TOP, ENDS & SIDESPER MANUFACTURER'S SHOP DRAWINGMIN. STORAGE VOLUME (BELOWOVERFLOW) REQUIRED=2,500 CFCISTERN IE=812.9015" OVERFLOW IE=817.90FLOOD STORAGE BASIN, SEE GRADINGPLAN.12" FES 8IE=819.00INSTALL RIP RAP PER MNDOT SPEC155 LF 12" HDPE @ 0.00%IE=819.0012" FES 7IE=818.00INSTALL RIP RAP PER MNDOT SPEC33 LF 12" HDPE @ 1.00%OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE 5RE=822.00IE(S/N)=818.30CONSTRUCT WEIR WALL IN MHTOP OF WEIR WALL=820.00STMH 6RE=822.00IE(S/N)=818.30IE (E)=819.006 LF 12" HDPE @ 0.00%IE=818.30UNDERGROUND POND 2PFOOTPRINT=202' X 17'1 ROW OF 202 LF 29"T X 42" WPERFORATED CMP ARCH PIPE6" STONE BASE AND TOP12" STONE ENDS6'-9" STONE SIDESSTONE BASE IE=817.80CMP IE=818.30CMP TOP=820.72STONE TOP=821.22SEE DETAIL100-YR HWL=820.46NWL=820.00UNDERGROUND POND 1PTWO CONNECTING SECTIONS OF 48" PERF. CMPSECTION A FOOTPRINT=140' X 30'SECTION B FOOTPRINT=102' X 30'INCLUDING 12" STONE SIDES AND ENDS6" STONE BASE AND TOPSTONE BASE IE=816.00CMP IE=816.50CMP TOP=820.50STONE TOP=821.00100-YR HWL=822.29NWL=818.00SEE DETAILOUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE 2RE=823.00IE(E/W)=816.50CONSTRUCT WEIR WALL IN MHTOP OF WEIR WALL=818.503" ORIFICE IN WEIR WALL, IE=818.0061 LF 24" HDP @ 0.00%IE=816.50STMH 1RE=821.40±IE=815.818 LF 15" HDPE @ 0.00%IE=816.5073 LF 15" HDPE @ 0.94%EX. MHRIM=820.30EX IE (S)=815.30(FIELD VERIFY)PR IE (NE)=815.50CORE DRILL NEWCONNECTION TOEXISTING MHCOORD. RELOCATIONOF EXISTINGELECTRIC MH WITHUTILITY OWNER33 LF 15" HDPE @ 0.94%CBMH 3RE=821.33IE=817.4112" INLETIE=816.5091 LF 12" HDPE @ 1.00%69 LF 12" HDPE @ 1.00%CB 4RE=821.98±IE=818.1061 LF 24" HDP @ 0.00%IE=816.50STUB 10" STORM TO 5' FROM BUILDING,COORD. W/ MECH'LSTUB IE=819.14STUB 10" STORM TO 5' FROM BUILDING,COORD. W/ MECH'LSTUB IE=819.147 LF 10" PVC SCH. 40 @ 2.00%10" BUILDING STORMDRAIN INLETIE=819.00, TYP.823.24 SURFACE INLET CBSTMH 9RE=825.00IE=816.8115" INLETIE=816.5062 LF 15" HDPE @ 0.50%182 LF 15" HDPE @ 0.50%CISTERN OVERFLOW OUTLETIE=817.90±CISTERN PUMP HOUSE FOR IRRIGATION &REUSERAINWATER FILTER MHSTUB 12" STORM SEWER TO 5' FROM BLDG,COORD. W/ MECH'LSTUB IE=816.50INLET IE=816.304931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:21105............04/30/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/30/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC4.0UTILITY PLAN............GENERAL UTILITY NOTES:UTILITY LEGEND:CITY OF EDINA UTILITY NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC UTILITY NOTES.01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCATCH BASINGATE VALVE AND VALVE BOXSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATER MAINPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTMANHOLEFES AND RIP RAP1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIESAND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLIMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THEPLANS.3. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHERSTATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURSPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANYUTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.4. UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARDSPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION" AND "SANITARYSEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERSASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), AND SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTSOF THE CITY AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.5. CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE-USED ORPLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER.6. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) AWWA C151, ASME B16.4,AWWA C110, AWWA C153 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) ASTM D3034 & F679,OR SCH 40 ASTM D1785, 2665, ASTM F794, 1866) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.8. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE ASTM F714 & F2306 WITH ASTM D3212 SPECFITTINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.9. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OFFLARED END SECTION.10. UTILITIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THECONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDINGLINES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS.11. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALLCATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIMELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS.12. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.13. HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITYREQUIREMENTS. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL.14. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18"VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTHWATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL.15. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTALSEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.16. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITYSTANDARDS AND COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.17.CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE CORE-DRILLED.18. COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICALDRAWINGS.19. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIESWITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF.20. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTSOF THE CITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFICCONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHEDPER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROLDEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TOSIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETSSHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTEDWITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY.21. ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADESWHERE REQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH.STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTSFOR TRAFFIC LOADING.22. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES.23. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES.COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOTIMPACT INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES.24. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION ANDSUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK.25.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT ORWATERTIGHT. APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKEWATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES.26.ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THEBUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN RULES,CHAPTER 4714, SECTION 1109.0.27.FOR ALL SITES LOCATED IN CLAY SOIL AREAS, DRAIN TILE MUST BE INSTALLED AT ALLLOW POINT CATCH BASINS 25' IN EACH DIRECTION. SEE PLAN AND DETAIL. INSTALL LOWPOINT DRAIN TILE PER PLANS AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS ANDREQUIREMENTS. 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:21105............04/30/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/30/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC5.0CIVIL DETAILS............6"8"12"13 1/2" 6"1/2" RADIUSFINISHED GRADE3" RADIUS CORNERS1:3 BATTER SLOPE GUTTER3/4"/1'NOTES:1. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT10'-0" O.C. +/-2. BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPONSOIL CONDITIONSCLASS V AGGREGATE SUBBASE-SEEBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DETAIL (6" MIN.)FINISHED GRADE0.5% SLOPE-CONSTRUCT WITH REVERSE SLOPEGUTTER (T.O. GUTTER) WHERE THE PAVEMENT SLOPESAWAY FROM CURB. SEE PLANN T SB-612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER7"37"20"FINISHED GRADESLOPE GUTTER 3/4"/1'NOTES:1. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT 10'-0" O.C. +/-2. BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPON SOIL CONDITIONSCONTINUOUS SLOPE CONCRETE CURBAND GUTTERPAVEMENT MATERIALSSEE DETAIL6"6"RIBBON CURBN T S4EXTEND POST PAST TOP OF POST10 DEGREE SLOPE1 INCH SILICONE RUBBEROR ASPHALTIC CAULKINGCOMPOUNDFILL ANNULAR SPACE TO 1 INCHFROM TOP WITH SILICA SANDCONCRETE FOOTING AS SPECIFIED6"3'-6"2'-6" 60"-66" FROM PAVEMENT TO BOTTOM OF SIGN 1/2"MATERIAL VARIES-SEE PLANMETAL SIGN ACCORDINGTO MN STATE CODENOTE:1. SIGN SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED.2. VERIFY POST PAINT C0LOR WITH LANDSCAPEARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.ACCESSIBLE SIGN AND POSTN T S1'-6"6" O.D. GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE PAINTED WITH 1COAT OF APPROPRIATE PRIMER AND TWO COATSSIGN ENAMEL. FILL ANNULAR SPACE WITH GROUT.COVER WITH YELLOW "IDEAL SHIELD" PLASTICCOVER.GREEN POWDER COATED STEEL SQUAREPOST AS SPECIFIED1/4" METAL PLATE WELDED TOBOTTOM OF 6” PIPEGALVANIZED STEEL FASTENER(TYP. OF 2)6MEDIUM-DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT8" CLASS 5 AGGREGATESUBBASE (MNDOT 3138)2.0" BASE COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPNWB330B)TACK COAT (MNDOT 2357)1.5" WEAR COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPWEA340B)COMPACTED SUBGRADE (100% OF STANDARDPROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY)N T S1NOTE:SECTION IS FORBIDDING PURPOSESONLY. REFER TOGEOTECH FORFINAL PAVEMENTSECTION.LIGHT-DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATESUBBASE (MNDOT 3138)1.5" BASE COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPNWB330B)TACK COAT (MNDOT 2357)1.5" WEAR COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPWEA340B)COMPACTED SUBGRADE (100% OF STANDARDPROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY)N T SNOTE:SECTION IS FORBIDDING PURPOSESONLY. REFER TOGEOTECH FORFINAL PAVEMENTSECTION.2UNREINFORCED CONCRETE PAVEMENTN T SNOTES:1. SEE GEO-TECHNICALREPORT FOR BASERECOMMENDATIONS.2. INSTALLATION SHALLBE IN ACCORDANCE TO ACERTIFIED, ON-SITEM.A.P.A. TECHNICIAN ASSPECIFIED.6" UNREINFORCED CONCRETEPAVEMENT (MNDOT 2461)6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE SUBBASE(MNDOT 3138)COMPACTED SUBGRADE (100% OFSTANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRYDENSITY)5 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.com612-615-0060PENTAGON PARK RESIDENTIAL 4660 W 77TH ST, EDINA MN 55435 724 N 1ST ST, SUITE 500, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SOLHEM COMPANIES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:21105............04/30/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:RL, MWDK..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202148776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/30/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC5.1CIVIL DETAILS............ 768. 0' 408. 0 ' 240. 0 ' 528. 0' 120.0' 264. 0 ' 84. 0'84. 0'180. 0'180.0'35'BUILDINGSETBACKNOPARKING1 A PAINTED SHARED BIKE LANE SPECIAL PAVING AT PLAZA FOUNDATION PLANTINGS AT ENTIRE BUILDING PERIMETER; MIX OF SHRUBS, PERENNIALS, GROUNDCOVERS COLUMNAR TREES AT BUILDING WALL COLUMNAR TREES AT BUILDING WALL SPECIAL PAVING AT ENTRY PLAZA AND IN PARKING BAYS ENHANCED PLANTINGS AT ENTRY STAIR ORNAMENTAL TREES AT DRIVE EDGE SHRUB HEDGE AT DRIVE EDGE CANOPY TREES IN GRASS BOULEVARD ENHANCED PLANTINGS AT SITE ENTRY ENHANCED PLANTINGS AT SITE ENTRY COLUMNAR TREES AT BUILDING WALL SIDEWALK WITH DRIVEABLE CRUSHED STONE SHOULDERS FOR FIRE ACCESS ACCESSIBLE WALK CONNECTION TO PARK ASPEN BOSQUE BOSQUE OF COLUMNAR TREES PICKLEBALL COURT ACCESSIBLE WALK CONNECTION TO PARK HOT TUB SUN DECK LOUNGE SEATING AREAS TERRACING DOWN HILLSIDE STORMWATER FEATURE CASCADES DOWN THROUGH ENTIRE COURTYARD AMENITY DECK WITH GRILLS, BAR, SINK, FIRE PIT, LOUNGE FURNISHINGS DOG RUN WITH 4' TALL, BLACK VINYL-COATED CHAIN LINK FENCE AND DOGIPOT WASTE STATION PUBLIC TRAIL ACCESS TO PARK TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering B K V R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2395-03 Pentagon Park/2395-03 Pentagon Park_LAND_2021.rvt4/29/2021 6:55:31 PMBH BH 2395-03 L100 OVERALL SITE/LANDSCAPE PLAN PENTAGON PARK APARTMENTS ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 04-30-2021 SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL 1" = 20'-0"L100 1 OVERALL SITE LANDSCAPE REFERENCE PLAN PROPOSED PLANT SCHEDULE: QTY SYM COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME PLANTING SIZE PERENNIALS/VINES/ANNUALS 1 ac MAGGIE DALEY ASTILBE Astilbe chinensis 'Maggie Daley' #1 CONT. 1 ca FEATHER REED GRASS Calamagrostis arundinacea var. brachtytricha #1 CONT. 1 hb BLUE ANGEL HOSTA Hosta 'Blue Angel'#1 CONT. 1 hh HAPPY RETURNS DAYLILY Hemerocallis 'Happy Returns' #1 CONT. 1 pa HAMELN FOUNTAIN GRASS Pennisetum alopecuroides 'Hameln' #1 CONT. 1 pt PACHYSANDRA 'Green Carpet' Pachysandra terminalis 'Green Carpet' #1 CONT. 1 pv NORTHWIND SWITCHGRASS Panicum virgatum 'Northwind' #1 CONT. 1 rh WALKER'S LOW CATMINT Nepeta x faassenii 'Walker's Low' #1 CONT. 1 sh PRAIRIE DROPSEED Sporobolus heterolepis #1 CONT. 1 ss LITTLE BLUESTEM 'Blue Heaven' Schizachyrium scoparium 'Minnblue A' (PP17, 310) #1 CONT. ORNAMENTAL TREES 7 AG AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY Amelanchir x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance' 2" CAL. 2 BP WHITESPIRE BIRCH (CLUMP) Betula populifolia 'Whitespire' 2.5" CAL. 8 CC NORTHERN CLUMP REDBUD Cercis canadensis #20 CONT. 5 SR SUMMER STORM LILAC Syringa reticulata 'Summer Storm' (PPAF) 2" CAL. DECIDUOUS TREES 8 AS GREEN MOUNTAIN SUGAR MAPLE Acer saccharum 'Green Mountain' 2.5" CAL. 7 BN RIVER BIRCH Betula nigra 2.5" CAL. 6 BP DAKOTA PINNACLE BIRCH Betula platyphylla 'Fargo' 2.5" CAL. 3 GB AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO Ginkgo Biloba 'Autumn Gold' 2.5" CAL. 8 GT SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST Gleditsia triacanthos var. inermis 'Skycole' 2.5" CAL. 6 PT PRAIRIE GOLD ASPEN Populus tremuloides 'NEArb' 2.5" CAL. 8 QA QUAKING ASPEN Populous tremuloides #20 CONT. 7 QB SWAMP WHITE OAK Quercus bicolor 2.5" CAL. 5 QW KINDRED SPIRIT OAK Quercus x warei 'Nadler' 2.5" CAL. 5 TA AMERICAN SENTRY LINDEN Tilia americana 'MnKSentry' 2.5" CAL. DECIDUOUS SHRUBS 1 Bw NORTHERN CHARM BOXWOOD Buxus 'Wilson'#3 CONT. 1 Cc SUGARTINA CLETHRA Clethra alnifolia 'Crystalina' (PP21, 561) #2 CONT. 1 Cf ARCTIC FIRE DOGWOOD Cornus stolonifera 'Farrow' (PP18,523) #5 CONT. 1 Cs CARDINAL DOGWOOD Cornus sericea 'Cardinal' #5 CONT. 1 Ds BUTTERFLY BUSH HONEYSUCKLE Diervilla sessilifolia 'Butterfly' #5 CONT. 1 Dw DWARF WINGED EUONYMOU Euonymous alatus 'Compactus' #10 CONT. 1 Ra GRO LOW SUMAC Rhus aromatica 'Gro Low' #5 CONT. 1 Sm DWARF KOREAN LILAC Syringe meyeri 'Palibin' #5 CONT. 1 Sr RED ELDERBERRY Sambucus racemosa #5 CONT. 1 Ss SEM FALSE SPIREA Sorbaria sorbifolia 'Sem'(PP16,336) #2 CONT. CONIFEROUS TREES 1 JC SPARTAN JUNIPER Juniper chinensis 'Spartan' 6' B&B 12 PA NORWAY SPRUCE Picea abies 8' B&B 7 PS WHITE PINE Pinus Strobus 6' B&B CONIFEROUS SHRUBS 1 Cp KING'S GOLD CHAMAECYPARIS Chamaecyparis pisifera 'King's gold' #5 CONT. 1 Ct HEATHERBUN CHAMAECYPARIS Chamaecyparis thyoides 'Heather Bun' #5 CONT. 1 Jh BLUE CHIP JUNIPER Juniperus horizontalis 'Blue Chip' #5 CONT. 1 Jp SEA GREEN JUNIPER Juniperus x pfitseriana 'Sea Green' #5 CONT. 1 Js BLUE FOREST JUNIPER Juniperus sabina 'Blue Forest' #5 CONT. 1 Pb SCHOODIC PINE Pinus banksiana 'Schoodic' #3 CONT. 1 Tc TECHNITO ARBORVITAE Thuja occidentalis 'Bailjohn' (PP15, 850) 6' B&B *PLANT SCHEDULE FOR SPECIES REFERENCE ONLY, FINAL QUANTITIES TO BE DETERMINED IRRIGATION NOTE: ALL PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE DRIPLINE IRRIGATION, ALL TURF AREAS TO RECEIVE SPRAY NOZZLES RESIDENTIAL UNITS 7TH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN STAIR ROOF BELOW ROOF BELOW 5TH - 6TH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN3RD - 4TH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 2ND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN1ST LEVEL FLOOR PLANP1 LEVEL FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLANS A2-0 ROOF BELOW ROOF BELOW ROOF BELOW RESIDENTIAL UNITSRESIDENTIAL UNITS STAIRSTAIR STAIR STAIR STAIR STOR.STOR.STOR.STOR.STOR.STOR. M T M T M TM T M T M T M TELEVATORSELEVATORSELEVATORS RESIDENTIAL UNITS PLAZA DECK PLAZA DECK PUB GUEST SUITE COWORKLOUNGELOUNGEOPEN TO BELOW CONF. FITNESS WEIGHT ROOM FITNESS YOGA GAME ROOM PLAZA DECK GARAGE ENTRY RESIDENTIAL UNITS RESIDENTIAL UNITS RESIDENTIAL UNITS RESIDENTIAL UNITS RESIDENTIAL UNITS RESIDENTIAL UNITS RESIDENTIAL UNITS CLUB ROOM SAUNA POOL MECH RAMP DN.RAMP DN.RAMP UPMECH STOR. M TSTAIR HALF STORY USE TBD OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW MECH RESIDENTIAL UNITS MECH TRASH LOBBY LEASE MAIL PACK.TRASH BIKE CAFE 8% RAMP MECH RAMP UPREFLECTING POOLEXT. METAL GRATE STAIR AMENITY 0 40 80 N COLORED, PATTERNED ROCK BALLASTED ROOF 388'-8"184'-0"65'- 0"65'-0"65'-0"177'-0"402'-0"AMENITY 40'-0"131'-10"65'-0"86'-10"65'-0" STAIR STAIR STAIR STAIR STAIR STAIR STAIRSTAIRSTAIRSTAIRSTAIRSTAIR ELEVATORS ELEVATOR ELEVATORS201'-8"ELEVATOR ELEVATOR ELEVATOR ELEVATOR ELEVATOR ELEVATOR ELEVATOR ELEVATORS8'-0"22'-0"OPTIONAL PARKING AREA (BASED ON FEASIBILITY) BUILDING AREA:97,581 SF MEP STORAGE:950 SF TRASH/LOADING:969 SF AMENITY:1,786 SF LOBBY/LEASING:1,749 SF GROSS RES. AREA:12,222 SF CIRCULATION:1,155 SF NET RES. AREA:11,067 SF UNIT COUNT:16 UNITS PARKING/ SERVICES:79,905 SF 190-240 SPACES BASEMENT TOTAL PARKING: BUILDING AREA:92,387 SF MEP STORAGE:967 SF TRASH/LOADING:169 SF AMENITY:654 SF GROSS RES. AREA:24,842 SF CIRCULATION:2,113 SF NET RES. AREA:22,729 SF UNIT COUNT:32 UNITS PARKING/ SERVICES:65,755 SF 193 SPACESTOTAL PARKING: GROUND LEVEL BUILDING AREA:87,713 SF MEP STORAGE:1,174 SF TRASH/LOADING:162 SF AMENITY:12,966 SF GROSS RES. AREA:43,899 SF CIRCULATION:8,550 SF NET RES. AREA:35,349 SF UNIT COUNT:50 UNITS PARKING/ SERVICES:29,512 SF 87 SPACES LEVEL 2 TOTAL PARKING: BUILDING AREA:67,577 SF MEP STORAGE:816 SF TRASH/LOADING:182 SF GROSS RES. AREA:66,579 SF CIRCULATION:6,810 SF NET RES. AREA:59,769 SF UNIT COUNT:84 UNITS LEVELS 3-4 BUILDING AREA:39,144 SF MEP STORAGE:828 SF TRASH/LOADING:182 SF GROSS RES. AREA:38,134 SF CIRCULATION:3,847 SF NET RES. AREA:34,287 SF UNIT COUNT:48 UNITS LEVELS 5-6 BUILDING AREA:39,144 SF MEP STORAGE:828 SF TRASH/LOADING:182 SF AMENITY:733 SF GROSS RES. AREA:37,401 SF CIRCULATION:4,065 SF NET RES. AREA:33,336 SF UNIT COUNT:46 UNITS LEVEL 7 SOLHEM COMPANIES724 N 1st Street, Suite 500 Minneapolis, MN 55401 7TH FLOOR 74'-8" 6TH FLOOR 64'-0" 5TH FLOOR 53'-4" 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3-0 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (825.2 ELEV)P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (823.00 ELEV) ROOF 85'-4" 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (823.0 ELEV) 7TH FLOOR 74'-8" 6TH FLOOR 64'-0" 5TH FLOOR 53'-4" 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (823.00 ELEV) 7TH FLOOR 74'-8" 6TH FLOOR 64'-0" 5TH FLOOR 53'-4" 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (823.00 ELEV) 7TH FLOOR 74'-8" 6TH FLOOR 64'-0" 5TH FLOOR 53'-4" 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (823.00 ELEV) 7TH FLOOR 74'-8" 6TH FLOOR 64'-0" 5TH FLOOR 53'-4" 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (823.00 ELEV) 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (823.0 ELEV) 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (825.2 ELEV) ELEVATION GENERAL NOTES 1. P1 ELEVATION AT 823.0 BASED ON LOWEST ALLOWED ELEVATION PER FLOOD PLANE ELEVATION 2. LOWEST ALLOWED OPENINGS ON BUILDING TO BE AT 825.2 ELEVATION PER FLOOD PLANE ELEVATION 3. MAX BUILDING HEIGHT OF 85' BASED ON AVERAGE GRADE PLANE OF 829 4. COLORED ELEVATION SKIN KEYED BELOW - SEE ELEVATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES ELEVATION EXTERIOR SKIN KEY FACE BRICK PATTERNED PRECAST CONCRETE PANEL (NOTED ON ELEVS AT GARAGE AREAS ONLY) UTILITY FACE BRICK FIBER CEMENT PANEL FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING VERTICAL METAL PANEL WALL MOUNTED BUILDING SIGNAGE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING BY LICENSED SIGN CONTRACTOR - SEE ELEVATIONS FOR POTENTIAL LOCATIONS - SIZE AND QUANTITY TBD PER ZONING CODE FIBER CEMENT TRIM BAY VINYL WINDOWS TYPICAL (FIXED AND AWNING) FIBER CEMENT PANEL FACE BRICK W/ ACCENT BRICK BANDING PREFIN. ALUMINUM DECKS TYP. FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING W/ ACCENT TRIM BANDING FACEBRICK PATTERNED PRECAST PANEL 7TH FLOOR 74'-8" 6TH FLOOR 64'-0" 5TH FLOOR 53'-4" 4TH FLOOR 42'-8" 3RD FLOOR 32'-0" 2ND FLOOR 21'-4" 1ST FLOOR 10'-8" P1 FLOOR 0'-0" (823.00 ELEV) VINYL WINDOWS TYPICAL (FIXED AND AWNING) FIBER CEMENT PANEL VINYL SLIDING PATIO DOORS TYPICAL FACE BRICK W/ ACCENT BRICK BANDING PREFIN. ALUMINUM DECKS TYP. INSULATED O.H. GARAGE DOOR FACEBRICK PATTERNED PRECAST PANEL FIBER CEMENT PANEL ELEVATOR OVERRUN ROOF PATIO ACCESS FIBER CEMENT TRIM BAY FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING W/ TRIM ACCENT TRELLIS VERTICAL METAL PANEL FACEBRICK PATTERNED PRECAST PANEL FACEBRICK W/ ACCENT BRICK BANDING VINYL WINDOWS TYPICAL (FIXED AND AWNING) PORTE COCHERE FIBER CEMENT PANEL FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING COURTYARD ELEVATION (EAST FACING) NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION COURTYARD ELEVATION (WEST FACING) SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATIONTRELLIS & PERGOLA PORTE COCHERE POTENTIAL SIGNAGE LOCATIONS POTENTIAL SIGNAGE LOCATIONS POTENTIAL SIGNAGE LOCATION ENLARGED SIGNAGE ELEVATION ELEVATOR OVERRUN ROOF PATIO ACCESS FACEBRICK W/ ACCENT BRICK BANDINGFACEBRICK PATTERNED PRECAST PANEL VERTICAL METAL PANEL FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING W/ TRIM ACCENT FIBER CEMENT PANEL FIBER CEMENT PANEL FIBER CEMENT PANEL FACEBRICK W/ ACCENT BRICK BANDING FIBER CEMENT TRIM BAY VINYL SLIDING PATIO DOORS TYPICAL VINYL WINDOWS TYPICAL (FIXED AND AWNING) VINYL SLIDING PATIO DOORS TYPICAL FACEBRICK W/ ACCENT BRICK BANDING TRELLIS & PERGOLA FIBER CEMENT PANEL SOLHEM COMPANIES724 N 1st Street, Suite 500 Minneapolis, MN 55401 UTILITY BRICK VENEER FIBER CEMENT PANEL SIDING VERTICAL METAL PANEL VINYL WINDOW FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING PRECAST PANEL BRICK PATTERN * VARIED COLOR EXPOSURE HUNG ALUMINUM BALCONY FIXED AWNING * TO MATCH UTILITY BRICK VENEER VINYL SLIDING DOOR Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2021 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2395-03 Pentagon Park/2395-03 Pentagon Park_DESIGN_2021.rvt4/26/2021 10:39:35 AMAuthor Checker 2395-03 EX-1 EXTERIOR MATERIALS PENTAGON PARK APARTMENTS ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION SOLHEM COMPANIES724 N 1st Street, Suite 500Minneapolis, MN 55401 A3-1 City of Edina – New Construction Sustainability Questionnaire Page 1 4660 West 77th Development Questionnaire The City of Edina has set ambitious goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the community. To help achieve these goals, developers seeking City approval must complete this form as part of their their zoning application. Upon receipt of this form, please email Sustainability Coordinator, Grace Hancock, GHancock@edinamn.gov, to set up a time to walk through the form and discuss sustainable building strategies. Please email the completed form to Cary Teague, CTeague@edinamn.gov, and copy Grace Hancock. Topics Answers Yes or No Brief Description Sustainable Design & Energy Consumption Will you utilize Xcel Energy’s Energy Design Assistance and/or Centerpoint Energy’s Builder and Developer programs for this development? Yes We have used this program on almost all of our projects and have achieved substantial savings beyond code on recent developments. Will the buildings meet SB2030 energy goals? Yes The building is expected to perform beyond code. Actual energy use will be determined through the EDA process mentioned above. Sustainable design is a key value we incorporate into all buildings that we build. Past residential projects have met LEED Gold Multifamily standards and we will use similar design principles for this project. Will the building be LEED certified? No However, the building will follow Gold LEED guidelines for multifamily housing. Will all appliances and equipment be Energy Star or EPA WaterSense certified? Yes All appliances that can be Energy Star cerified will be. Will different strategies to conserve energy (beyond those required by code) be included? If so, please describe Yes We will be assessing multiple strategies such as high efficiency HVAC equipment, water efficient fixtures, extra insulation, use of fans for ambient cooling, lighting control sytems, low-E argon filled windows, and LED lighting systems. Will there be renewable energy such as solar or wind be generated on site? Yes/No However, we will be planning portions of the main roof to be solar ready where feasible, and incorporating plantings and green roof elements within the center courtyard plaza and our City of Edina – New Construction Sustainability Questionnaire Page 2 4660 West 77th Development Questionnaire planned rooftop patio. Our windows will be maximized for solar thermal gain in winter months. Will the project include a geothermal system? No Not planned Will the completed project subscribe to a community solar program or other renewable energy program? No Not planned; however Solhem’s sister company Renew22 invests directly in solar gardens in MN to offset ALL electrical demand generated by this project. Will there be purchase of renewable energy credits (RECs)? No Not planned; however Solhem’s sister company Renew22 invests directly in solar gardens in MN to offset ALL electrical demand generated by this project. Comments: Managing Storm Water What percent of the property is pervious surface before the redevelopment? What is the percent post development? Yes 82% Existing Pervious Surface. The proposed new development will more than double the Pervious Surface area. What new surfaces will be pervious? (i.e. Sidewalks, driveways, overflow parking) TBD We are reviewing options for possible incorporation. Will a green roof be included on the new structure to assist in storm water retention? Yes Green roof elements within the center courtyard plaza and our planned rooftop patio. Will rain gardens or similar features be included on site to filter and retain the storm water? Yes This is a core principle of development for our buildings that also serves to enhance a healthy environment for humans. The exact percentage of landscape elements have not been determined at this time. Comments: Landscaping Features to Manage Air Quality and Heat Island Effect Will existing healthy trees be protected and saved? Yes We will preserve as many healthy trees as possible. What percent of the property is covered by tree canopy before redevelopment? What is the percent post development? The existing site has approximately 8% of tree canopy. The long term goal post developmet is 35% tree canopy. Will you be replanting/replacing trees at least four to five inches in diameter to positively impact the tree canopy (ordinance requirement is only 2.5 inches in diameter)? Yes Best planting practices for trees will be followed to insure a vibrant and healthy landscape. In our landscape design we aim City of Edina – New Construction Sustainability Questionnaire Page 3 4660 West 77th Development Questionnaire to protect as many mature trees on the site as possible and add bio-diversity and climate hardiness with tree selections. Will shade trees be provided along roadways, drives and surface parking areas beyond those required by code? Yes Almost all of our required parking is within a structured garage. We will meet the code for the few exterior spaces. Will native plantings be used in the landscaping? Yes The landscaping will have extensive use of climate hardy native plants and trees. Will landscaping include pollinator-friendly varieties? Yes We will use pollinator friendly plantings wherever possible. Will future owners and managers be trained in methods to avoid harmful chemicals being used on landscaping? Yes The goal is to eliminate the need for pesticides and other in landscaping. Comments: Managing Construction Waste Will demolition of existing structures meet LEED Green Building Demolition and/or B3 State of Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines? TBD To be determined pending an environmental analysis of the existing structures. Will existing building elements be salvaged for reuse? Example, timber, steel, asphalt, cabinets, etc. TBD Significant reuse and recycling has already occurred in the existing buildings. Further recycling to be determined pending an environmental analysis of the existing structures. As much material as possible will be recycled. Are scrap and excess construction materials being separated and recycled? Yes We will work with the General Contractor for execution. Are workers provided with separate recycling dumpsters and training in proper use? Yes We will work with the General Contractor for execution. Comments: Managing Operational Waste Will a recycling service be provided to those in the multifamily complex? To any businesses on site? Yes Recycling chutes are being provided on each floor. Will an organic recycling service be provided to those in the multifamily complex? To all businesses on site? Yes Organics recycling will be provided and encouraged. Will future users of the building be provided with education and training regarding proper recycling practices? Yes The owner has an active resident training agenda including manual that helps educate future tenants. Comments: Managing Water Consumption City of Edina – New Construction Sustainability Questionnaire Page 4 4660 West 77th Development Questionnaire Is the project including features to reduce water consumption beyond features required by code? Yes We will be using low flow plumbing fixtures and native plants to reduce irrigation. Is there a grey water system included to reuse water on site? Will future users of the building be provided with education and training regarding conservation of water? TBD This is something that is being strongly considered in capturing run off from the roof areas. Will outdoor landscaping watering system include a water sensor to automatically reduce watering in wet conditions? Yes Comments: Sustainable Transportation Features Is the site accessible by public transit within ½ mile? Yes There are bus routes along W.77th Street. Are site features included to make the use of public transit convenient and simple? Examples include sheltered waiting areas, paved sidewalks and clear site lines. Yes The project plans on sidewalks along W. 77th as well as waiting areas for riders. If there is no public transit within ½ mile, is the project providing features to help bridge the distance to allow flexibility to use public transit? NA Is bike Parking available near the main entrance for guests? Space in parking structure (e.g. bike corral, bike lockers) for residents’ bikes? Yes There will be several guest bike parking spots at various points on the site in addition to bike parking for each unit, with bike paths woven throughout the site landscaping that connect to the Nine Mile Creek Trail. We are aiming for a ratio of one bike stall per bedroom. Is bike parking and a shower facility provided for employees? Yes There is a planned a bike lounge for use by both employees and residents. Do you have EV Charging Stations for owners, guests or customers to use? Yes A substantial amount of EV garage parking stalls will be provided, and the electrical service will be set up to easily allow expansion as more of the vehicles in the garage convert to electric. We typically install about 5% of stalls with EV charging on new construction buildings Will there be parking spaces provided for car- sharing vehicles to reduce the overall number of cars? TBD To be determined. City of Edina – New Construction Sustainability Questionnaire Page 5 4660 West 77th Development Questionnaire Updated January 2021 The Planning Commission is asked to consider a redevelopment proposal to redevelop 4660 77th Street West, which is part of the Pentagon Park office development. The applicant is proposing to tear down the existing two office buildings on the site and construct a 5-7 story, 408-unit apartment. (See attached plans.) As this parcel is considered part of the Greater Southdale District, Mic Johnson, the City’s consultant has provided a review of the proposed plans at sketch plan. (See attached memo.) This site was rezoned to Mixed Development District – 6 (MDD-6) in 2008; however, no development ever took place. The MDD zoning designation was used before the City established PUD Zoning in 2011. Attached is a copy of the approved Overall Development Plan Concept that was approved as part of the rezoning. There was to be a mixture of office and residential uses. Note that the subject property was specifically contemplated for multi- family residential housing. Pentagon Village was part of this MDD-6 District and was where the office and retail uses were to be located. However, that site was recently rezoned to PUD, and is no longer part of the MDD. This site was considered for a PUD Rezoning in 2014 and 2017. However, that proposal was ultimately denied. (See attached resolution denying the project and the concept plan that was considered.) The request would require the following: 1. A Rezoning from MDD-6 to PUD. Flexibility would be requested through the PUD Ordinance to vary from parking and floor area ratio (FAR) requirements. The PUD Zoning is also used to ensure affordable housing on the site. May 26, 2021 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Preliminary Rezoning & Preliminary Development Plan for Solhem Companies at 4660 77th Street West. Information / Background: STAFF REPORT Page 2 The applicant has gone through the sketch plan process and has revised the plans to respond to comments from the Planning Commission and City Council. Below is a list of some of the changes: 77th Street Facade: • Revised entry level to be at sidewalk grade compared to 10 feet above grade. • Created architecturally strong building entrance with a new central massing. • Activated sidewalk and streetscape with added glass and active uses, blended with landscape to great a welcoming pedestrian experience along the porte cochere • Broke up massing along 77th Street into 3 primary facades; recessed the primary massing in two areas; followed the guideline to have no mass longer than 200 feet; created layers of landscaping and vines to soften the façade. 77th Streetscape: • Made curb cuts perpendicular to 77th Street in order to create safer pedestrian to vehicle sight lines. • Activated 77th Street streetscape, and revised massing and elevations to draw people into the building and the trails that connect to the park. • Added double rows of trees along the sidewalk. • Eliminated large change in elevation to connect the building entry with the sidewalk. • Added glass and building articulation to break up the facade and make more transparent/see- through. • Eliminated the idea of an “on-ramp” and made the sidewalk more pedestrian friendly. • Created a buffer area between sidewalk and street. East Side Fred Richards Park Connection: • Developed east side connection with a grove of trees and midpoint connection into the building courtyard. • Angled building to create enhanced pathway connections and view planes into the park. North Side Fred Richards Park Connection: • Seamlessly joined the apartment property with the Nine Mile Creek Trail and park. • Engaged the park with an added aspen grove that guides pedestrians into the park. • Lowered the property elevation to preserve storm water storage while blending with park topography. • Used native landscaping species that are compatible with existing park landscape and climate hardiness. West Side Woonerf: • Created landscape bays throughout parking and street areas to turn the west driveway and parking into a Woonerf. • Will plan to connect rainwater into landscape bays along Woonerf to emulate a green street. • End of Woonerf blends with parkway connection for both pedestrians and bikes that runs along northern edge of site, connecting with the east side park connection trail. Water: • Integrated water storage in the rooftop, added a courtyard stormwater infiltration stream bed, and built-in flood storage zones on the site while reducing impermeable surface area. • Addressed groundwater concerns by bringing basement level up, and relocating parking under the east wing. • Revised elevations to maintain water storage areas in the event of potential flooding. Sustainability: • Added rooftop garden/agricultural space for residents. • Reoriented landscape of the site to best allow for apartment access to light, air, trees, and views. STAFF REPORT Page 3 • Passive and active energy conservation. • Integrated stormwater management (see above). Affordable Housing: • Targeting affordability with typical units at approximately 73% AMI; focusing on an underserved population of lower middle-class families. This housing does not meet the definition of affordable housing. • Created direct park accessibility for lower income families. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Fred Richards Park and Regional Trail; zoned R-1, Single-dwelling Unit District, and guided Open Space and Parks. Easterly: Edina County Club; zoned R-1, Single-dwelling Unit District and public/semi-public. Southerly: Office building; zoned MDD-6, Mixed Development District, and guided OR, Office Residential (20-75 units per acre). Westerly: Office building; zoned MDD-6, Mixed Development District, and guided OR, Office Residential (20-75 units per acre). Existing Site Features The subject property is 5.44 acres in size and contains two office buildings. Planning Guide Plan designation: OR, Office Residential (20-75 units per acre). Zoning: MDD-6, Mixed Development District Parking Based on the proposal for a total of 408 residential units in a Mixed Development District, 714 parking stalls are required with 408 enclosed under the City’s existing off-street parking regulations. Under the draft off-street ordinance amendment, recommended by the Planning Commission, 510 total spaces are required, 408 enclosed. The proposal is to provide 552 stalls total with 502 enclosed and 50 surface stalls. Wenck/Stantec conducted a parking analysis and concluded that 534 spaces would be adequate to serve this development (See attached Traffic and Parking Study.) Site Circulation/Traffic Vehicular access to the site for the restaurant would be off 77th Street and access to the underground parking on the west side of the building. There would be pedestrian trails on all sides of the building. The main trail connection to the Regional Trail in Fred Richard Park is on the east side of the building. The applicant has enhanced this area compared to the sketch plan proposal. Because this is a primary access to the regional trail, staff recommends widening this path from 5 to 8 feet. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Wenck/Stantec Consulting conducted a parking and traffic study. (See attached study.) The study concludes that the existing roadway system would support the project. The net trips added to the roadway system by the proposed development would have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. No roadway improvements are needed. Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site 50 overstory trees would be required. The applicant is proposing over 100 overstory trees in the boulevard and around the perimeter of the site and within the courtyard. (See attached landscape plan.) A full complement of understory shrubs and bushes are proposed. Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined in their review memo. (See attached.) A developer’s agreement would be required for the construction of the proposed sidewalks and utilities. Any approvals of this project would be subject to review and approval of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, as they are the City’s review authority over the grading of the site. Building/Building Material The building materials would be a combination primarily brick, fiber cement panel, vertical metal panel and glass. (See attached renderings.) Mechanical Equipment No mechanical equipment has been shown on the plans. Any rooftop and/or ground level equipment would have to be screened if visible from adjacent property lines. Final Plans must include location of mechanical equipment and the means of screening. No ground level mechanical equipment shall be located within the front yard of the development. Signage The signage allowed on the site would correspond to the use. The signage proposed would be allowed within the PUD. No signage shall face the park. Way finding signage should be installed on 77th Street to direct pedestrian and bicycle traffic to the regional trail. Sustainability The applicant has provided the sustainability questionnaire. (See attached.) Additionally, the City’s sustainability coordinator has reviewed the plans and provided comments and recommendations in the engineering memo. (See attached engineering memo.) These shall be made conditions of approval. STAFF REPORT Page 5 Living Streets/Multi-Modal Consideration Sec. 36-1274. - Sidewalks, trails and bicycle facilities. (a) In order to promote and provide safe and effective sidewalks and trails in the city and encourage the use of bicycles for recreation and transportation, the following improvements are required, as a condition of approval, on developments requiring the approval of a final development plan or the issuance of a conditional use permit pursuant to article V of this chapter: (1) It is the policy of the city to require the construction of sidewalks and trails wherever feasible so as to encourage pedestrian and bicycle connectivity throughout the city. Therefore, developments shall provide sidewalks and trails which adjoin the applicant's property: a. In locations shown on the city's sidewalk and trail plan; and b. In other locations where the council finds that the provision of such sidewalks and trails enhance public access to mass transit facilities or connections to other existing or planned sidewalks, trails, or public facilities. (2) Developments shall provide sidewalks between building entrances and sidewalks or trails which exist, or which will be constructed pursuant to this section. (3) Developments shall provide direct sidewalk and trail connections with adjoining properties where appropriate. (4) Developments must provide direct sidewalk and trail connections to transit stations or transit stops adjoining the property. (5) Design standards for sidewalks and trails shall be prescribed by the engineer. (6) Nonresidential developments having an off-street automobile parking requirement of 20 or more spaces must provide off-street bicycle parking spaces where bicycles may be parked and secured from theft by their owners. The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the automobile parking space requirement. The design and placement of bicycle parking spaces and bicycle racks used to secure bicycles shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. Whenever possible, bicycle parking spaces shall be located within 50 feet of a public entrance to a principal building. (b) The expense of the improvements set forth in subsection (a) of this section shall be borne by the applicant. The applicant would be installing sidewalks on all sides of the building, including the boulevard style sidewalk on 77th. See the attached memo from the engineering department regarding the city’s Living Streets Policy. These recommendations would be in the conditions of approval. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Per Section 36-253 the following are the regulations for a PUD: STAFF REPORT Page 6 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for “Office Residential,” which allows for residential, and office uses. The existing zoning and approved development plan for the site allows residential uses. There is not much housing location within this area. Introducing housing into the area will assist with the commercial areas to the west including the Pentagon Village commercial area on the south side of 77th; which was the intent of the original MDD-6 zoning district. The existing MDD-6 Zoning Designation is not appropriate as that zoning was designed with a specific plan in mind. Since that development did not STAFF REPORT Page 7 happen, and a portion of that MDD-6 Zoning District has already been rezoned to PUD (Pentagon Village), a rezoning to PUD is appropriate. Primary parking is located under and within the building, which is pulled up closer to the street, and separated from the street by green space to promote a more walkable environment. Sidewalks are provided all around the building including a significant connection to the regional bike trail. The proposed buildings would be a high-quality brick, with metal siding. The applicant has indicated that would meet the City’s affordable housing policy by buying in. Ten percent of the of development would include 41 units. Therefore, at $100,000 per required affordable housing units, the applicant would be required to pay $4.1 million dollars for the City of Edina to provide affordable housing elsewhere in the City. (See attached memo from the city’s affordable housing manager.) 2. Applicability/Criteria a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in this Chapter shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and the existing zoning on the site. This site was originally contemplated for housing when the MDD was created. (See approved development plan for this site.) b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following: i. where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as Office Residential, as mentioned, the original Mixed-Use Development contemplated for this site was high density residential. ii. any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; The proposed is a single-land use. However, because it is a use that is not prevalent in this area, the proposal is acceptable. As mentioned, this site was approved for a high-density residential development that was part of a horizontal mixed-use project. STAFF REPORT Page 8 The office and retail uses were contemplated for the Pentagon Park South Site, which is occurring in the Pentagon Village site. iii. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and As mentioned, the uses allowed are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The densities allowed would be specifically stated in the PUD Ordinance. The density proposed is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan at 75 units per acre. iv. the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above. The table on the following page shows how the proposed new building would comply with the MDD-6 Zoning Ordinance Standards and the zoning standard in the new PUD-22 District. Please note that most standards are met under the conventional zoning. The notable changes are height and parking. Compliance Table City Standard (MDD-6) Proposed Building Setbacks Front – 77th Street Rear – Fred Richards Park Side – West Side – East 35 feet 35 feet 20 feet 20 feet 43-55 feet 26 feet 51 feet 55 feet Building Height 4 stories & 48 feet 5-7 stories & 52-86 feet Density 20-75 units per acre (5.44 acres) 75 units per acre Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.0% 1.5%* Parking Housing – 1 enclosed space per unit + .75 surface spaces per unit = 714 spaces required (510 required in draft ordinance) 552 spaces* *Does not meet base Zoning Standards-Flexibility would be requested through a PUD STAFF REPORT Page 9 PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the proposal reasonable to justify PUD rezoning for this site? Yes. Staff does support the revised rezoning of the site, for the following reasons: 1. The project that was supposed to be built under the existing MDD-6 Zoning Designation never developed. Part of this original MDD-6 has already been rezoned with the Pentagon Village development that was rezoned to PUD in 2019. (See original MDD-6 Zoning District and the Pentagon Village PUD.) MDD zoning was the tool the City of Edina used before it had a PUD Ordinance. 2. Housing was proposed on this site in the MDD-6 Development that was not built. (See attached MDD-6 Plan.) 3. The project would provide a significant buy in to the City’s affordable housing fund. Ten percent of the of development units (408) would include 41. Therefore, at $100,000 per required affordable housing units, the applicant would be required to pay $4.1 million dollars for the City of Edina to provide affordable housing elsewhere in the City. 4. The proposed height of seven stories is reasonable for this site. To provide affordable housing elsewhere in the City in providing the buy in monies, additional height is needed to create more market rate units to help absorb the cost of the affordable housing units. The building height overlay district limits this site to four stories. The nearest single-family home to this site is 700 feet to the north. Section 36-618 (6) of the City Code requires that buildings that are 7 stories tall, be setback 4 times the height of the building from the 7-story portion of the building to the nearest single-family lot line. The building would be 86 feet tall, therefore, a 344-foot setback is required. Note that the building height steps down toward the Park and the single-family homes to the north. 5. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for “Office Residential,” which allows for residential uses. The existing zoning and approved development plan for the site allows residential uses. There is not much housing location within this area. Increasing housing into the area will assist with the commercial areas to the west including the Pentagon Village commercial area on the south side of 77th. Primary parking is located under and within the building, which is pulled up closer to the street, and separated from the street by green space to promote a more walkable environment. Sidewalks are provided all around the building including a significant connection to the regional bike trail. The proposed buildings would be a high-quality brick, with metal siding. The applicant has indicated that would meet the City’s affordable housing policy by buying in. Ten percent of the of development would include 41 units. Therefore, at $100,000 per required affordable housing units, the applicant would be required to pay $4.1 million dollars for the City of Edina to provide affordable housing elsewhere in the City. STAFF REPORT Page 10 6. The proposed project would meet the following additional goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Per the Office Residential Land Use Description: Primary uses are offices, attached or multifamily housing. b. Façade Articulation. Primary facades should be designed with a well-defined base, middle and top, providing visual interest at ground level. Building entries and access points should be clearly visible from the primary street. Long building facades should be divided into smaller increments using contrasting materials, textures, detailing, setbacks, or similar techniques. c. Building Height Transitions. Taller buildings (generally four stories or higher) should step down to provide a height transition to surrounding residential buildings, including buildings across a street or pathway, and to avoid excessive shadowing of sidewalks, parks, and public spaces. d. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods and key destinations, and with other communities, to improve multimodal transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on cars. Staff Recommendation Options for Consideration & Recommendation A case can be made for approval and denial of this project. Below are options for the planning commission and city council to consider for approval and denial: Approval Recommend the City Council approve the request for Preliminary Rezoning of the site from MDD-6 to PUD-22, Planned Unit District-22. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses, and density are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the existing Zoning on the site. 2. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The PUD zoning would: a. Promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City. c. Provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements include sustainable design, greater utilization of new STAFF REPORT Page 11 technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street. d. Project is of high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned. e. Maintains the efficiency of public streets and utilities. f. Provides a mixture of land uses within the development. g. Project would meet the City’s affordable housing policy. 3. The PUD would ensure that the development proposed would be the only building that would be allowed on the site unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council and ensures the buy-in funds to provide affordable housing elsewhere in the City of Edina. 4. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Per the Office Residential Land Use Description: Primary uses are offices, attached or multifamily housing. b. Façade Articulation. Primary facades should be designed with a well-defined base, middle and top, providing visual interest at ground level. Building entries and access points should be clearly visible from the primary street. Long building facades should be divided into smaller increments using contrasting materials, textures, detailing, setbacks, or similar techniques. c. Building Height Transitions. Taller buildings (generally four stories or higher) should step down to provide a height transition to surrounding residential buildings, including buildings across a street or pathway, and to avoid excessive shadowing of sidewalks, parks, and public spaces. d. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods and key destinations, and with other communities, to improve multimodal transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on cars. 6. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. Wenck Consulting conducted a traffic and parking impact study and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. 7. The proposed height of seven stories is reasonable for this site. To provide affordable housing elsewhere in the City in providing the buy in monies, additional height is needed to create more market rate units to help absorb the cost of the affordable housing units. The building height overlay district limits this site to four stories. The nearest single- family home to this site is 700 feet to the north. Section 36-618 (6) of the City Code requires that buildings that are 7 stories tall, be setback 4 times the height of the building from the 7-story portion of the building to the nearest single-family lot line. The building would be 86 feet tall, therefore, a 344-foot setback is required. Note that the building height steps down toward the Park. 8. The proposed uses would be an upgrade to the current development on the site. STAFF REPORT Page 12 Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated April 30, 2021. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. A Developer’s Agreement/Site Improvement Plan Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 8. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant/developer must pay the buy-in amount for affordable housing of $4.1 million dollars for the City of Edina to provide affordable housing elsewhere in the City. 9. Compliance with all the conditions outlined in the engineering memo dated May 27, 2021. 10. Compliance with the Wenck Consulting Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. 11. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment revising the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 12. Dedication of public access easement over the north-south sidewalk along the east side of the property and the east west sidewalk along 77th Street. The north-south sidewalk must be widened from 5 feet to 8 feet wide, and maintenance shall be the property owner’s responsibility. The City will maintain the sidewalk along 77th Street. The boulevard between the street and the sidewalk shall be 10 feet. 13. The Maintenance of sidewalks internal to the site to be responsibility of property owner. 14. Submittal of a construction management plan subject to review and approval of city staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 15. Hours of construction must be consistent with City Code. STAFF REPORT Page 13 Denial Recommend the City Council deny the request for Preliminary Rezoning of the site from MDD-6 to PUD-22, Planned Unit District-22. Denial is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed height and density are not reasonable for the site. The maximum height for the property is four stories and 48 feet. 2. The proposal does not meet the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The proposal does not meet the purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the request subject to the findings and conditions listed above. Deadline for a City decision: August 17, 2021 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Community Development Department Phone 952-927-8861 • Fax 952-826-0390 • EdinaMN.gov Date: May 20, 2021 To: Planning Commission cc: Cary Teague, Community Development Director From: Stephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager Subject: Compliance with Affordable Housing Policy Pentagon Park Housing Development, 4660 77th Street West The proposed development at 4660 77th Street West complies with the Policy for New Multifamily Affordable Housing. The Policy offers developers 3 main options: 1) 10% of the units at 50% AMI rent levels; 2) 20% of the units at 60% AMI rent levels; or 3) a buy-in amount of $100,000 per units for 10% 0f the units. The developer is opting for option 3: contributing $100,000 per unit for 10% of the developed units, which amounts to $4,100,000. Although the City has adopted the goal of developing between 992 and 1,804 new affordable units, the Buy- in funds are a flexible source to for the development and preservation of affordable housing in the absence of other eligible sources. For example, Buy-In funds can be used for the development and preservation of single family and multi-family ownership opportunities unlike TIF and Low-Income Housing Tax Credits which can only be used for rental properties. Affordable Housing programs that were financed with Buy-In funds: •Naturally Occurring Affordable Housing preservation program. •Acquisition and rehabilitation of moderately priced single-family homes for Community Land Trust program for long term affordable ownership. •Gap financing for affordable units at Nolan Mains. •Emergency Rental Assistance during COVID. DATE: 5/27/2021 TO: 4660 77th Street, Owner and Development Team CC: Cary Teague – Community Development Director FROM: Chad Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Grace Hancock, Sustainability Coordinator Ross Bintner, PE, Engineering Services Manager RE: 4660 77th St – Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for pedestrian facilities, utility connections, grading, flood risk, and storm water. Plans reviewed included survey, site plan, grading and drainage, utility, stormwater management plans dated April 30, 2021. Review Comment Required For General 1. Deliver as-build records of public and private utility infrastructure post construction. Certificate of Occupancy 2. Maintenance of sidewalks within the property is the responsibility of property owner. Sidewalks in ROW along 77th Street are the City’s responsibility. City snowplowing operations are 5-ft wide on these sidewalks. General Comment Survey 3. An existing and proposed site condition survey is required. Grading/Building Permit 3.1 Show all existing and proposed public and private easements. -City records indicate easements running east-west along the south property line and running north-south along the west property line for public road right-of-way, signals, utilities, and walkways recorded in Doc #3598236 dated July 2002. Grading/Building Permit 3.2 Provide 15-ft road and walkway easement along 77th Street for public sidewalk maintenance purposes and space to allow future installation of on street bike lanes. Certificate of Occupancy 3.3 Provide walkway easement along east property line for public sidewalk connected to NMCRT. Living Streets 4. City supports north-south sidewalk along east property line and the connection to the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail (NMCRT) Grading/Building Permit managed by Three Rivers Park District (TRPD). TRPD will allow connections to regional trails if the City holds an easement on the sidewalk and if the sidewalk connects to other public sidewalks. Sidewalk size and corners need to meet TRPD standards to be connected. Provide 8-ft wide sidewalk unless otherwise approved by City and TRPD. Corner at north end of the project needs to be softened so cyclists can navigate. Soften corner and provide public walkway easement to the City. Property owner is responsible for maintenance of this sidewalk connection from 77th Street to NMCRT. This future connection location on City property must also be used for future development of 4600 77th Street. 5. Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan notes plans for on-street bike lanes and public sidewalk on 77th Street. Grading/Building Permit 6. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. Grading/Building Permit 7. Saw cut concrete sidewalk joints on public sidewalks. Grading/Building Permit 8. Public sidewalk to be minimum 5’ in width with a 5’ boulevard. Applicant showing 6-ft wide sidewalk with a 4-ft wide boulevard. Recommend placing sidewalk with a 10-ft blvd to create space for a future on street bike lane. Grading/Building Permit 9. Replace Xcel owned street lighting along 77th Street with lighting to support the public sidewalk along 77th Street and resident drop-off area. Lighting shall be property owner’s infrastructure and maintenance responsibility. Traffic and Street 10. Review fire access requirements with fire department. Fire truck turning template attached. Grading/Building Permit 11. Driveway Entrance permit required for entrance construction/ relocation/ removal. Comply with standard plate 415. Indicate the radii; must be 15’. Note maximum width for 2-way entrance is 30’. Close up existing entrances, standard plate 500. Building Permit 12. 77th Street scheduled for mill & overlay in 2023. Road patching shall conform to Edina Standard Plates at the time of any required road patching. Certificate of Occupancy Sanitary and Water Utilities 13. Verify fire demand and hydrant locations with fire department. Comply with standard plate 100. Grading/Building Permit 14. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 15. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 16. Apply for a sewer and water connection permit with Building Inspections. Three existing connections to abandon at the main. Prior to Starting Utility Work 16.1 Sanitary service shall be planned for flood risk on trunk line. Use either an overhead sanitary service line with minimum service fixture opening 2’ above flood level, or backflow prevention. 16.2 Meter required for building service line and combined lines. No meter required for fire only service line. Grading/Building Permit 16.3 Public Works to determine acceptable installation methods. Grading/Building Permit 17. Disconnected sanitary and water services to be capped at main. 18. A SAC determination will be required by the Metropolitan Council. The SAC determination will be used by the City to calculate sewer and water connection charges Grading/Building Permit 19. Single connection from main for fire and domestic, split after main connection if building code allows. Grading/Building Permit 20. An internal watermain loop exists between 4660 and 4600. Water service changes to 4600 will be the responsibility of the applicant. The City has a need to create a watermain loop along west and north side of the property. City willing to discuss partial funding to upsize watermain with applicant. Watermain loop will require easements provided by the applicant. Floodplain 21. Site drains to NMS_95 to the south, and NMS_74 local subwatershed to the north. The 1%-annual chance flood elevation is 822.7, and 823.2 respectively. The LFE is 824.0, 2’ above the creek tailwater elevation of approximately 822. The lowest opening elevation is 2’ above the local flood elevation. Indicate the proposed lowest opening and lowest floor elevations. No net fill is allowed below local flood elevations. Grading/Building Permit Certificate of Occupancy 22. Per CWRMP Section 3.1.2.2 (2), construction of below-grade parking garages is permitted, provided the structure (including the parking garage) is flood proofed to two feet above the applicable 1-percent-annual-chance flood elevation in accordance with the following design standards: a. Together with associated utility and sanitary facilities, the structure must be designed so that below two feet above Grading/Building Permit the 1%-annual-chance flood elevation the structure is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water and with structural components having the capability of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy. b. A Floodproofing Certificate and Inspection and Maintenance Plan must be provided by a registered professional engineer or architect. c. A floodproofing design that entails human intervention, such as the installation of flood gates or flood shields, will require a Flood Emergency Operation Plan Storm Water Utility 23. Provide final, signed geotechnical report with soil borings. Grading/Building Permit 24. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report meeting watershed and state construction site permit requirements. Grading/Building Permit 25. Hydraulic design must consider restricted tailwater condition in 10% and 1% annual exceedance events, City hydraulic model is available for developer review. Grading/Building Permit 26. Submit watershed district permit and copies of private maintenance agreement in favor of watershed. Grading/Building Permit Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 27. A SWPPP consistent with the State General Construction Site Stormwater Permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Constructability and Safety 28. Construction staging and traffic control plans will be required. Grading/Building Permit 29. Retaining walls over 4-ft in height require design by a structural engineer. Provide drawings and calculations signed by MN licensed civil engineer. Grading/Building Permit 30. Any short-term road or lanes closures shall be approved by the City Engineer. General Comment 31. Construction staging or construction fencing shall not impede the City’s ability to snowplow the adjacent streets. If construction fencing removes storage space for snow, developer shall be responsible for snow removal in the street adjacent to any impacts to City operations. General Comment Other Agency Coordination 32. Provide copies required permits (e.g., MDH, MPCA, and MCES) Grading/Building Permit MPCA permit shall be closed out for permit closeout. Certificate of Occupancy 33. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Sustainability 34. Staff recommends installing EV chargers for a minimum of 5% proposed parking in addition to wiring 10% for EV conversion in the future. General Comment 35. Staff recommends development consider applying to join HOURCAR multi-family carsharing program to supply residents with electric car-sharing options General Comment 36. Site plan shows a bike café within the underground parking. Staff recommends providing a minimum of one bike parking stall for every 10 residential units (41) and one surface bike parking stall for every 20 residential units (21). These parking stalls should be in convenient, well-lit locations within 50’ of a public entrance to the building. Rack style and spacing should follow the recommendations of the Association for Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (APBP). General Comment 37. Staff recommends implementing four (min.) suggested additional Travel Demand Management strategies: • Provide surface bike parking (21 stall min.); • Provide a bike repair station on-site, located adjacent to surface or underground bike parking; • Construct perimeter and internal sidewalks 8’ wide or more to safely accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists; • Provide directional signage/information for adjacent pedestrians, bicycle and transit facilities and ride-sharing services; • Work with Metro Transit to construct a bus shelter on 77th Street for Local Routes 6 and 540; or • Subsidize Metro Transit passes for tenants and employees. General Comment 38. Staff recommends development consider participating in the Met Council’s Solar for Vouchers program to receive technical advice and support for solar panel installation. General Comment 39. The Metropolitan Council's Extreme Heat map shows that during an extreme heat event (when air temperatures are 90 or above), this area of Edina can be 9-25 degrees F hotter than surrounding areas. Green roofs reduce the urban heat island effect, reducing amount of greenhouse gas emissions trapped in the atmosphere and energy needs to cool a building. Staff recommends adding a General Comment green roof or garden to reduce this urban heat island effect and energy costs to cool the building. 40. The University of Minnesota's Solar Suitability map rates 4660 W 77th St as "good" for solar roof installations with a grade of 81 out of 100. Staff recommends considering this assessment when assessing the roof for green roof or solar options. General Comment 41. See Sustainable Design Questionnaire for additional considerations. General Comment Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.H. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Bridge Deck Crack Sealing Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for Bridge Deck Crack Sealing with New Look Contracting for $53,600. INTRODUCTION: This project is for concrete crack sealing operations on three bridges - 78th Street over CP Rail, 56th Street over Minnehaha Creek, and Gus Young Lane over CP Rail. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Bridge Deck Crack Sealing Contract Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12100195 Department:Engineering Buyer:Chad Millner Date: 09/14/2021 Requisition Description:Bridge Deck Sealing Vendor:NEW LOOK CONTRACTING INC Cost:$53,600.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:QUOTE/BD - QUOTE/BID DESCRIPTION: This project will perform concrete crack sealing operations on the following three bridges: 78th Street over CP Rail, 56th Street over Minnehaha Creek, and Gus Young Lane over CP Rail. BUDGET IMPACT: This project is funded by public works operating budget. 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT: This project maintains the bridge infrastructure. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:NA 140400v01 RNK:08/06/2010 Engineering 2/7/2014 FORM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF EDINA AND CONTRACTOR FOR NON-BID CONTRACT ENG 21-15NB BRIDGE DECK CRACK SEALING THIS AGREEMENT made this 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“Owner” or “City”) and NEW LOOK CONTRACTING, INC., a corporation (“Contractor”). Owner and Contractor, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, agree as follows: 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the “Contract Documents”, all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Agreement. B. City of Edina General Contract Conditions C. Exhibit (1 sheet), prepared by City of Edina. D. Contractor’s Quote. In the event of a conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts with Contract Document “A” having the first priority and Contract Document “E” having the last priority. 2. OBLIGATIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR. The Contractor shall provide the goods, services, and perform the work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 3. CONTRACT PRICE. Owner shall pay Contractor for completion of the Work, in accordance with the Contract $53,600.00, inclusive of taxes, if any. 4. PAYMENT PROCEDURES. A. Contractor shall submit Applications for Payment. Applications for Payment will be processed by the City Engineer. B. Progress Payments; Retainage. Owner shall make 95% progress payments on account of the Contract Price on the basis of Contractor’s Applications for Payment during performance of the Work. C. Payments to Subcontractors. (1) Prompt Payment to Subcontractors. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 471.25, Subd. 4a, the Contractor must pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of the Contractor’s receipt of payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. The Contractor must pay interest of 1 ½ percent per month or any part of a month to the subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest 140400v01 RNK:08/06/2010 Engineering 2/7/2014 penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100.00 or more is $10.00. For an unpaid balance of less than $100.00, the Contractor shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor. (2) Form IC-134 (attached) required from general contractor. Minn. Stat. § 290.92 requires that the City of Edina obtain a Withholding Affidavit for Contractors, Form IC-134, before making final payments to Contractors. This form needs to be submitted by the Contractor to the Minnesota Department of Revenue for approval. The form is used to receive certification from the state that the vendor has complied with the requirement to withhold and remit state withholding taxes for employee salaries paid. D. Final Payment. Final payment will not be made until the Contractor has filed with the Owner a fully and duly executed Affidavit, General Waiver and Indemnity Agreement, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B and hereby made a part hereof, together with such other and additional evidence as Owner may request, in form and substance satisfactory to the Owner, that all labor, materials and services expended or used in the Work have been paid for in full and that no liens or other claims for such labor, materials or services can be made or claimed against Contractor, Owner or any other person or any property. In case such evidence is not furnished, the Owner may retain out of any amount due said Contractor a sum sufficient, in the reasonable discretion of Owner, but in any event not less than one and one-half times the sum determined by Owner to be necessary, to pay for all labor, material, services or other claims which are then unpaid or which are then believed by Owner, in its reasonable discretion, to be unpaid. Upon final completion of the Work, Owner shall pay the remainder of the Contract Price as recommended by the City Engineer. 5. COMPLETION DATE. The Work must be completed by December 1, 2021. 6. CONTRACTOR’S REPRESENTATIONS. A. Contractor has examined and carefully studied the Contract Documents and other related data identified in the Contract Documents. B. Contractor has visited the Site and become familiar with and is satisfied as to the general, local, and Site conditions that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. C. Contractor is familiar with and is satisfied as to all federal, state, and local laws and regulations that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. D. Contractor has carefully studied all: (1) reports of explorations and tests of subsurface conditions at or contiguous to the Site and all drawings of physical conditions in or relating to existing surface or subsurface 140400v01 RNK:08/06/2010 Engineering 2/7/2014 structures at or contiguous to the Site (except Underground Facilities) which have been identified in the General Conditions and (2) reports and drawings of a Hazardous Environmental Condition, if any, at the Site. E. Contractor has obtained and carefully studied (or assumes responsibility for doing so) all additional or supplementary examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data concerning conditions (surface, subsurface, and Underground Facilities) at or contiguous to the Site which may affect cost, progress, or performance of the Work or which relate to any aspect of the means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction to be employed by Contractor, including any specific means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction expressly required by the Bidding Documents, and safety precautions and programs incident thereto. F. Contractor does not consider that any further examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, or data are necessary for the performance of the Work at the Contract Price, within the Contract Times, and in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Contract Documents. G. Contractor is aware of the general nature of work to be performed by Owner and others at the Site that relates to the Work as indicated in the Contract Documents. H. Contractor has correlated the information known to Contractor, information and observations obtained from visits to the Site, reports and drawings identified in the Contract Documents, and all additional examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data with the Contract Documents. I. The Contract Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for performance and furnishing of the Work. a. Contract includes bridge deck crack sealing on the following three bridges: 78th Street over CP Rail, 56th Street over Minnehaha Creek, and Gus Young Lane over CP Rail. J. Subcontracts: (1) Unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents, the Contractor shall, upon receipt of the executed Contract Documents, submit in writing to the Owner the names of the Subcontractors proposed for the work. Subcontractors may not be changed except at the request or with the consent of the Owner. (2) The Contractor is responsible to the Owner for the acts and omissions of the Contractor's subcontractors, and of their direct and indirect employees, to the same extent as the Contractor is responsible for the acts and omissions of the Contractor's employees. 140400v01 RNK:08/06/2010 Engineering 2/7/2014 (3) The Contract Documents shall not be construed as creating any contractual relation between the Owner and any subcontractor. (4) The Contractor shall bind every subcontractor by the terms of the Contract Documents. 7. WORKER’S COMPENSATION. The Contractor shall obtain and maintain for the duration of this Contract, statutory Worker’s Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance as required under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 8. COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY. Contractor shall obtain the following minimum insurance coverage and maintain it at all times throughout the life of the Contract, with the City included as an additional name insured on the general liability insurance on a primary and noncontributory basis. The Contractor shall furnish the City a certificate of insurance satisfactory to the City evidencing the required coverage: Bodily Injury: $1,000,000 each occurrence $1,000,000 aggregate products and completed operations Property Damage: $1,000,000 each occurrence $1,000,000 aggregate Contractual Liability (identifying the contract): Bodily Injury: $1,000,000 each occurrence Property Damage: $1,000,000 each occurrence $1,000,000 aggregate Comprehensive Automobile Liability (owned, non-owned, hired): Bodily Injury: $1,000,000 each occurrence $1,000,000 each accident Property Damage: $1,000,000 each occurrence 9. WARRANTY. The Contractor guarantees that all new equipment warranties as specified within the quote shall be in full force and transferred to the City upon payment by the City. The Contractor shall be held responsible for any and all defects in workmanship, materials, and equipment which may develop in any part of the contracted service, and upon proper notification by the City shall immediately replace, without cost to the City, any such faulty part or parts and damage done by reason of the same in accordance with the bid specifications. 10. INDEMNITY. The Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from any claim made by third parties as a result of the services performed by it. In addition, the Contractor shall reimburse the City for any cost of reasonable attorney’s fees it may incur as a result of any such claims. 140400v01 RNK:08/06/2010 Engineering 2/7/2014 11. PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS. Performance and payment bonds are not required for the doing of any public work if the contract price is $100,000 or less. On projects of more than $100,000 for the doing of public work a payment bond and a performance bond each in the amount of the contract price must be furnished to the City prior to commencement of work. The form of the bonds must satisfy statutory requirements for such bonds. 12. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Terms used in this Agreement have the meanings stated in the General Conditions. B. Owner and Contractor each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other party hereto, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives in respect to all covenants, agreements, and obligations contained in the Contract Documents. C. Any provision or part of the Contract Documents held to be void or unenforceable under any law or regulation shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon Owner and Contractor, who agree that the Contract Documents shall be reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and enforceable provision that comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provisions. D. Data Practices/Records. (1) All data created, collected, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose in the course of this Contract is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, any other applicable state statute, or any state rules adopted to implement the act, as well as federal regulations on data privacy. (2) All books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices to the Contractor and its subcontractors, if any, relative to this Contract are subject to examination by the City. E. Software License. If the equipment provided by the Contractor pursuant to this Contract contains software, including that which the manufacturer may have embedded into the hardware as an integral part of the equipment, the Contractor shall pay all software licensing fees. The Contractor shall also pay for all software updating fees for a period of one year following cutover. The Contractor shall have no obligation to pay for such fees thereafter. Nothing in the software license or licensing agreement shall obligate the City to pay any additional fees as a condition for continuing to use the software. F. Patented devices, materials and processes. If the Contract requires, or the Contractor desires, the use of any design, device, material or process covered by letters, patent or copyright, trademark or trade name, the Contractor shall provide for such use by suitable legal agreement with the 140400v01 RNK:08/06/2010 Engineering 2/7/2014 patentee or owner and a copy of said agreement shall be filed with the Owner. If no such agreement is made or filed as noted, the Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the Owner from any and all claims for infringement by reason of the use of any such patented designed, device, material or process, or any trademark or trade name or copyright in connection with the Project agreed to be performed under the Contract, and shall indemnify and defend the Owner for any costs, liability, expenses and attorney's fees that result from any such infringement. G. Assignment. Neither party may assign, sublet, or transfer any interest or obligation in this Contract without the prior written consent of the other party, and then only upon such terms and conditions as both parties may agree to and set forth in writing. H. Waiver. In the particular event that either party shall at any time or times waive any breach of this Contract by the other, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or any succeeding breach of this Contract by either party, whether of the same or any other covenant, condition or obligation. I. Governing Law/Venue. The laws of the State of Minnesota govern the interpretation of this Contract. In the event of litigation, the exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for Hennepin County. J. Severability. If any provision, term or condition of this Contract is found to be or become unenforceable or invalid, it shall not effect the remaining provisions, terms and conditions of this Contract, unless such invalid or unenforceable provision, term or condition renders this Contract impossible to perform. Such remaining terms and conditions of the Contract shall continue in full force and effect and shall continue to operate as the parties’ entire contract. K. Entire Agreement. This Contract represents the entire agreement of the parties and is a final, complete and all inclusive statement of the terms thereof, and supersedes and terminates any prior agreement(s), understandings or written or verbal representations made between the parties with respect thereto. L. Permits and Licenses; Rights-of-Way and Easements. The Contractor shall give all notices necessary and incidental to the construction and completion of the Project. The City will obtain all necessary rights-of- way and easements. The Contractor shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for any construction delay resulting from the City’s not timely obtaining rights-of-way or easements. M. If the work is delayed or the sequencing of work is altered because of the action or inaction of the Owner, the Contractor shall be allowed a time extension to complete the work but shall not be entitled to any other compensation. 140400v01 RNK:08/06/2010 Engineering 2/7/2014 CITY OF EDINA CONTRACTOR BY: ____________________________ BY: ___________________________ Its Mayor Its AND ___________________________ AND ___________________________ Its City Manager Its Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.I. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Derik Otten, Facility Manager Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Utley Park Shelter Roof Replacement Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for Utley Park shelter roof replacement with Central Roofing for $30,114. INTRODUCTION: The roof at Utley Park Shelter requires replacement. The existing asphalt-shingled roof has reached the end of its useful life and is starting to leak. In addition to the restroom and storage uses of this facility the building also houses Well No. 2. Keeping this interior space free from contaminates and the elements is of the utmost importance to ensure the safety of the city’s water supply. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Utley Park Shelter Roof Replacement Contract Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12100196 Department:Engineering Buyer:Derik Otten Date: 09/14/2021 Requisition Description:Utley Park Roofing Project Vendor:CENTRAL ROOFING COMPANY Cost:$30,114.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:QUOTE/BD - QUOTE/BID DESCRIPTION: Utley Park Restroom Shelter and Utility Building Roof Replacement BUDGET IMPACT: The project is funded by a combination of Parks and Utilities Operating Funds. 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT: The building supports both domestic water production and parks services. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: There is a possibility of an improvement to R-value if insulation needs replacement. if this occurs, it would make the building more energy efficient. APRIL 2018 A-1 IB CONTRACT NO. FC 21-27 UTLEY PARK ROOFING PROJECT THIS AGREEMENT made this 9th day of September 2021, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”) and Central Roofing (“Contractor”). City and Contractor, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, agree as follows: 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the “Contract Documents,” all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Agreement. B. Instructions to Bidders. C. City of Edina General Contract Conditions. D. Addenda numbers E. Specifications prepared by Oertel Architects. F. Plan sheets numbered A100-A103, M001-M102, E001-E102 G. Performance Bond. H. Payment Bond. I. Responsible Contractor Verification of Compliance J. Contractor’s bid dated September 9, 2021 K. Scope of Work Remove existing asphalt shingle roof Replace underlayment with ½” OSB per code Ice and Water Shield New GAF Timberline shingles Supply and Install New Roof Hatch—owners standard brand and style. Remove and replace architectural metals and flashings Dumpsters and site clean-up Permits & Inspections The Contract Documents are to be read and interpreted as a whole. The intent of the Contract Documents is to include all items necessary for the proper execution and completion of the Work and to require Contractor to provide the highest quality and greatest quantity consistent with the Contract Documents. If there are inconsistencies within or among part of the Contract Documents or between the Contract Documents and applicable standards, codes or ordinances, the Contractor shall provide the better quality or greater quantity of Work or comply with the more stringent requirements. 1.1 Before ordering any materials or doing any Work, the Contractor shall verify measurements at the Project site and shall be responsible for the correctness of such measurements. No extra charges or compensation will be allowed on account of differences between actual dimensions and the dimensions indicated on the APRIL 2018 A-2 IB Drawings. Any difference that may be found shall be submitted to the City for resolution before proceeding with the Work. 1.2 If a minor change in the Work is necessary due to actual field conditions, the Contractor shall submit detailed drawings of such departure to the City for approval before making the change. The City shall not be required to make any adjustment to either the Contract Sum or Contract Time because of any failure by the Contractor to comply with the requirements of this paragraph. Actual or alleged conflicts or inconsistencies between the Plans and Specifications or other Contract Documents shall be brought to the City’s attention in writing, prior to performing the affected Work. The City’s directions shall be followed by the Contractor. 2. OBLIGATIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR. The Contractor shall provide the goods, services, and perform the work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 3. OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY. The City agrees to pay, and the Contractor agrees to receive and accept payment in accordance with the Contractor’s bid $31,117.00 4. PAYMENT PROCEDURES. A. Contractor shall submit Applications for Payment. Applications for Payment will be processed by City as provided in the General Conditions. B. Progress Payments; Retainage. City shall make 95% progress payments on account of the Contract Price on the basis of Contractor’s Applications for Payment during performance of the Work. C. Payments to Subcontractor. (1) Prompt Payment to Subcontractors. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 471.25, Subd. 4a, the Contractor must pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of the Contractor’s receipt of payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. The Contractor must pay interest of 1½ percent per month or any part of a month to the subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100.00 or more is $10.00. For an unpaid balance of less than $100.00, the Contractor shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor. (2) Form IC-134 required from general contractor. Minn. Stat. § 290.92 requires that the City of Edina obtain a Withholding Affidavit for Contractors, Form IC-134, before making final payments to Contractors. This form needs to be submitted by the Contractor to the Minnesota Department of Revenue for approval. The form is used to receive certification from the state that the vendor has complied with the requirement to withhold and remit state withholding taxes for employee salaries paid. D. Final Payment. Upon final completion of the Work, City shall pay the remainder of the Contract Price as recommended by City. 5. COMPLETION DATE. The Work must be completed and ready for final payment by December 30th, 2021. 6. CONTRACTOR’S REPRESENTATIONS. A. Contractor has examined and carefully studied the Contract Documents and other related data identified in the Contract Documents. APRIL 2018 A-3 IB B. Contractor has visited the Site and become familiar with and is satisfied as to the general, local, and Site conditions that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. C. Contractor is familiar with and is satisfied as to all federal, state, and local Laws and Regulations that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. D. Contractor has carefully studied all: (1) reports of explorations and tests of subsurface conditions at or contiguous to the Site and all drawings of physical conditions in or relating to existing surface or subsurface structures at or contiguous to the Site (except Underground Facilities) which have been identified in the General Conditions; and (2) reports and drawings of a Hazardous Environmental Condition, if any, at the Site. E. Contractor has obtained and carefully studied (or assumes responsibility for doing so) all additional or supplementary examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data concerning conditions (surface, subsurface, and underground facilities) at or contiguous to the Site which may affect cost, progress, or performance of the Work or which relate to any aspect of the means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction to be employed by Contractor, including any specific means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction expressly required by the Bidding Documents, and safety precautions and programs incident thereto. F. Contractor does not consider that any further examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, or data are necessary for the performance of the Work at the Contract Price, within the Contract Times, and in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Contract Documents. G. Contractor is aware of the general nature of work to be performed by City and others at the Site that relates to the Work as indicated in the Contract Documents. H. Contractor has correlated the information known to Contractor, information and observations obtained from visits to the Site, reports and drawings identified in the Contract Documents, and all additional examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data with the Contract Documents. I. Contractor has given City written notice of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities, or discrepancies that Contractor has discovered in the Contract Documents, and the written resolution thereof by City is acceptable to Contractor. J. The Contract Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for performance and furnishing of the Work. K. Subcontracts: (1) Unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents, the Contractor shall, upon receipt of the executed Contract Documents, submit in writing to the City the names of the subcontractors proposed for the work. Subcontractors may not be changed except at the request or with the consent of the City. (2) The Contractor is responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of the Contractor's subcontractors, and of their direct and indirect employees, to the same extent as the Contractor is responsible for the acts and omissions of the Contractor's employees. (3) The Contract Documents shall not be construed as creating any contractual relation between the City and any subcontractor. (4) The Contractor shall bind every subcontractor by the terms of the Contract Documents. 7. WARRANTY. The Contractor guarantees that all new equipment warranties as specified within the bid shall be in full force and transferred to the City upon payment by the City. The Contractor shall be held responsible for any and all defects in workmanship, materials, and equipment which may develop in any part of the contracted service, and upon APRIL 2018 A-4 IB proper notification by the City shall immediately replace, without cost to the City, any such faulty part or parts and damage done by reason of the same in accordance with the bid specifications. 8. INDEMNITY. The Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from any claim made by third parties as a result of the services performed by it. In addition, the Contractor shall reimburse the City for any cost of reasonable attorney’s fees it may incur as a result of any such claims. 9. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Terms used in this Agreement have the meanings stated in the General Conditions. B. City and Contractor each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other party hereto, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives in respect to all covenants, agreements, and obligations contained in the Contract Documents. C. Any provision or part of the Contract Documents held to be void or unenforceable under any Law or Regulation shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon City and Contractor, who agree that the Contract Documents shall be reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and enforceable provision that comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provisions. D. Data Practices/Records. (1) All data created, collected, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose in the course of this Contract is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, any other applicable state statute, or any state rules adopted to implement the act, as well as federal regulations on data privacy. (2) All books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices to the Contractor and its subcontractors, if any, relative to this Contract are subject to examination by the City. E. Copyright/Patent. Contractor shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or patent by reason of the use or adoption of any designs, drawings or specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the City from loss or damage resulting there from. If the equipment provided by the Contractor pursuant to this Agreement contains software, including that which the manufacturer may have embedded into the hardware as an integral part of the equipment, the Contractor shall pay all software licensing fees. The Contractor shall also pay for all software updating fees for a period of one year following cutover. The Contractor shall have no obligation to pay for such fees thereafter. Nothing in the software license or licensing agreement shall obligate the City to pay any additional fees as a condition for continuing to use the software. F. Assignment. Neither party may assign, sublet, or transfer any interest or obligation in this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party, and then only upon such terms and conditions as both parties may agree to and set forth in writing. G. Waiver. In the particular event that either party shall at any time or times waive any breach of this Agreement by the other, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or any succeeding breach of this Agreement by either party, whether of the same or any other covenant, condition or obligation. H. Governing Law/Venue. The laws of the State of Minnesota govern the interpretation of this Agreement. In the event of litigation, the exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for Hennepin County. I. Severability. If any provision, term or condition of this Agreement is found to be or becomes unenforceable or invalid, it shall not affect the remaining provisions, terms and conditions of this APRIL 2018 A-5 IB Agreement, unless such invalid or unenforceable provision, term or condition renders this Agreement impossible to perform. Such remaining terms and conditions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and shall continue to operate as the parties’ entire agreement. J. Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire agreement of the parties and is a final, complete and all inclusive statement of the terms thereof, and supersedes and terminates any prior agreement(s), understandings or written or verbal representations made between the parties with respect thereto. K. Permits and Licenses; Rights-of-Way and Easements. The Contractor shall procure all permits and licenses, pay all charges and fees therefore, and give all notices necessary and incidental to the construction and completion of the Project. The City will obtain all necessary rights-of-way and easements. The Contractor shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for any construction delay resulting from the City’s not timely obtaining rights-of-way or easements. L. If the work is delayed or the sequencing of work is altered because of the action or inaction of the City, the Contractor shall be allowed a time extension to complete the work but shall not be entitled to any other compensation. M. Responsible Contractor. This contract may be terminated by the City at any time upon discovery by the City that the prime contractor or subcontractor has submitted a false statement under oath verifying compliance with any of the minimum criteria set forth in Minn Stat. § 16C.285, subd. 3. CITY OF EDINA CONTRACTOR BY: ____________________________ BY: ____________________________ City Manager Its AND ___________________________ Its APRIL 2018 D-1 IB Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.J. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Receive Petition for Sidewalk on West 66th Street Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Receive petition to install a sidewalk on West 66th Street between Ridgeview Drive and Highway 100. INTRODUCTION: Staff recommends referring the petition to the Engineering Department for consideration. See attached petition. ATTACHMENTS: Description Sidewalk Petition City of Edina, l\linnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th St��et • Edina, Minnesota 55424(952)927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX• (612) 927-5461 TDD / I DATE REC�. PETITION TCYTHE CITY COUNCIL / I I � SIDEWALK /'_.,,, 0 �YPAVING .0 WATER MAIN 0 STORM S�ER O/SANITARY SEWER O STREET LIGHTING 0 CURB AND GUTTER ONLY O PERMANENT STREET O OTHER: SURFACING WITH ---- CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have s�gned this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. w (p/J-lh St�e/ between l+w � I ts1:)and fQ;d-9ellfeUJ LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME DRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S ci��b NAME OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) 'k, V\ � ADDRESS PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) �BOO YfI'lJL., � < . 4£100\J1.tk'jUie,w&-5. -�Io� :f\beOLD.1»1k>, 1;; }) D t�.:)/ WJ (12.yJt-V: Av� {;�J..5 w i )l'J�"' /+Vl PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2008 Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.K. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Claims From:Lisa A. Schaefer, Assistant City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Approve League of Minnesota Cities Annual Membership Dues Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve payment of League of Minnesota Cities Annual Membership Dues (LMC). INTRODUCTION: LMC provides services to member cities including education, training, policy development, risk management, and advocacy. Annual membership dues for the City are $32,476. Members of LMC can also participate in League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT). T he City's property, casualty, and worker's compensation insurance is through LMCIT. ATTACHMENTS: Description LMC membership dues 2021 LMC Annual Report 2019-2020 Membership Dues Invoice Invoice Number: Effective during 2021-2022 347900 Population: 53,494 Dues Amount: $32,476 (Dues amount rounded to nearest dollar.) (Population represents the 2020 Census Information.) City of Edina Dues are based on your population. See how we calculated your dues at: www.lmc.org/dues For membership dues in the League of Minnesota Cities for the year beginning September 1, 2021. Annual dues for membership in the League of Minnesota Cities include subscriptions to Minnesota Cities magazine.* Pursuant to the disclosure requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 6.76, the proportionate amount of dues spent for lobbying purposes is 11.3%. This percentage is reported to the State Auditor as required by statute. Payment from Public Funds Authorized by Minn. Stats, Sec. 465.58 I declare under the penalties of law that the foregoing account is just and correct and that no part of it has been paid. Dated: September 1, 2021 Please Remit To: Finance Department League of Minnesota Cities 145 University Ave W St Paul, MN 55103-2044 Include this invoice or reference invoice #347900 with your payment. Questions: billing@lmc.org David J. Unmacht Executive Director, League of Minnesota Cities *Annual dues include subscriptions to Minnesota Cities magazine at $30 per subscription according to the following schedule based on population: 249 or less, 6; 250-4999, 11; 5000-9999, 15; 10000-19999, 20; 20000-49999, 25; 50000-299999, 30; 300000+, 35. For further information on subscriptions contact the League offices. This information is given in order to meet postal regulations. Please do not use as a basis for payment. The League will routinely communicate via e-mail with your city’s staff and elected officials as part of your membership in the League. MOVING FORWARD TOGETHER MOVING FORWARD TOGETHER LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES & LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST • ANNUAL REPORT 2019-2020 OUR MISSION The League of Minnesota Cities promotes excellence in local government through effective advocacy, expert analysis, and trusted guidance for all Minnesota cities. OUR VISION We envision a future for Minnesota and the League where: z All cities are thriving, taking advantage of new opportunities, and successfully meeting ongoing challenges. z The League continues to provide premier service to its members, and is recognized as the trusted, authoritative, and unified voice on issues affecting cities. Message from Executive Director David Unmacht Rising to the Challenge of These Uncertain Times In his poem “Servant to Servant,” Robert Frost writes, “The only way out is through.” These words uniquely define the work of our members and League this past year. We turned the calendar from December 2019 to January 2020 with optimism, energy, and plans for a great year. Beginning in February and within a few short weeks, we knew — the world knew — 2020 was going to be anything but normal. Instantly, we knew there was no way around it, so like all of you — we were innovative and worked our way through it. It has turned out to be even more unusual than we imagined. Appropriately, the League’s Annual Report has two separate but interdependent stories: before COVID-19 and after COVID-19. Through it all, the League remained consistent in offering programs and member services as we, seemingly overnight, switched from an in-person to a virtual world. The League offices closed indefinitely on March 18. With a steadfast commitment and an unparalleled learning curve, we rose to the occasion and continued providing our member services from a distance. These included learning opportunities and events, member visits, and our first ever virtual annual business meeting. How else will we change? How will we develop new ways to meet members’ needs? We won’t fully understand the answers to these questions for weeks or months. We anticipate continuing to use technology more to connect and educate, but we are also excited to be starting to gather in small groups again. We understand that the pandemic impacts each city differently, so we will remain nimble and flexible to help all cities regardless of need. Adding to the uncertainty of our times was the tragic killing of George Floyd in May, and the civil unrest that followed. Those events shined a new light on the need for progress in the area of race equity. We understand that these times are challenging for city officials, personally and professionally, yet we remain optimistic about our collective futures. The true test and capability of individual and team performance is measured not only in good times, but also in trying times. I am proud to say the League’s team has risen to the challenge and exceeded expectations. Thank you to League Past President Mike Mornson for recognizing the coronavirus response work of our entire staff with the 2020 President’s Award. Be assured that resting on our laurels is not in the League’s DNA. We are focused on moving forward together and remain committed to the mission of helping cities achieve excellence. Minnesota had its first known case of COVID-19 on March 6. As cities worked to figure out how best to keep their residents and employees safe while continuing to provide essential services, they turned to the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) for help. League staff responded to 3,770 legal, human resources, and financial inquiries between March 6 and Aug. 31, an increase of 32% over the same time period a year ago. The League began researching, listening, and talking to state and federal experts, and providing guidance. The COVID-19 News and Resources section was added to the LMC website on March 17. This section of about 70 web pages includes FAQs, model documents, information memos, and news articles. The COVID-19 hub page has become one of the most visited pages on the LMC website, with 30,364 views from March 17 to Aug. 31. Meanwhile, we also had to take steps to keep our members and staff safe. That meant canceling all our in-person events, including the Legislative Conference, nine LMCIT Safety & Loss Control Workshops, and the 2020 Annual Conference. Then the League provided COVID-19 education via webinars. During the week of March 23, we offered daily webinars, which launched the #WeGotThis series. By Aug. 31, the series included 16 programs. Webinars in this series broke attendance records, with the most popular being A Conversation with Gov. Tim Walz (604 attendees). We also offered a special #WeGotThis series of The City Speak podcast. These provided a personal look at how city leaders were dealing with the crisis. As the pandemic lingered, city budgets were impacted, and the League sought aid from the state and federal governments. On March 27, the federal Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was passed and included aid for state and local governments. The League responded to numerous member questions about distribution of the CARES Act funds from the state to cities, which occurred in early July. Cities also had questions about the rules on how and when they could spend the funds , reporting requirements, and more. League staff provided one-on-one guidance, as well as four webinars and six virtual roundtable discussions on the funding requirements. The League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust also responded to members’ pandemic- related needs, including going virtual with its loss control field visits and trainings for Regional Safety Groups. These services, which are usually provided in person, have been done via virtual meetings or phone calls since the pandemic started. There were 120 field visits and seven safety trainings between March and September. When the League’s fiscal year ended in August, the repercussions of the pandemic were still being felt throughout Minnesota and the entire nation. There is still great uncertainty about how and when it will end. But one thing is certain, the League will continue to be there for member cities, just as cities will be there for their residents. The League Responds to Members’ COVID-19 Needs RESPONDED TO 3,770 LEGAL, HUMAN RESOURCES, AND FINANCIAL INQUIRIES 70 WERE POSTED IN THE COVID-19 NEWS & RESOURCES SECTION OF THE WEBSITE, LAUNCHEDMARCH 17 NEARLY 5,000 ATTENDEES PARTICIPATED IN 16 WEBINARS IN THE #WeGotThis Series LAUNCHEDMARCH 23 As part of the #WeGotThis webinar series, Gov. Walz addressed Minnesota city leaders virtually on Apr. 24. PAGES Law Enforcement Support and Policy The past year saw a renewed public dialogue about the need for mental health support among first responders, the importance of positive police-community relations, and updates and reform in law enforcement procedures. The League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust has responded to new challenges in these areas, adding to an already robust menu of programs and services designed to assist the work being done by city councils and law enforcement personnel. MENTAL HEALTH The Trust has made the subject of mental health among first responders — including police officers — a strategic priority. Collectively, Trust members employ about 4,250 officers in the state. Over the past year, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) claims have trended upward, coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic and recent civil unrest that has affected police-community relations in some Minnesota cities. To address rising trends in claims for PTSD among officers, the Trust recently hired Lora Setter, a former law enforcement officer, as a public safety program coordinator to focus on public safety mental health. Collaborating with public safety groups, policymakers, and other stakeholders, Setter is working to help bring awareness to this issue and to reinforce the fact that PTSD need not be career-ending. LEGISLATIVE POLICY In the spring of 2020, Minnesota lawmakers enacted legislation that provided a presumption for COVID-19 workers’ compensation claims among public safety and health care workers. The Trust opposed the legislation because of the excessive financial burden it could place on the existing workers’ compensation system. Looking ahead, the Trust will continue to work with the Legislature and Gov. Tim Walz to identify and implement an appropriate funding source to pay for these claims. Additionally, in an effort to promote police reform measures, the state Legislature passed and Gov. Walz signed the Police Accountability Act. Though the legislation was a good start toward addressing structural inequities, the League and the Trust will continue to advocate for additional measures designed to promote effective and equitable public safety outcomes. Lora Setter Collectively, Trust members employ about 4,250 officers in the state. The past year saw a renewed public dialogue about the need for mental health support among first responders, the importance of positive police- community relations, and updates and reform in law enforcement procedures. The need for greater race equity and justice touches all communities, from the most racially diverse cities to those with very few or no people of color. More than five years ago, the League began its race equity work to provide our members with resources to create safer and more equitable cities for Minnesotans. We remain committed to sharing information and resources with our members about the benefits of addressing racial inequities, and to providing the tools needed to build a more equitable future when every resident can thrive regardless of race. In addition, the League has heard that members need support hosting productive community conversations and meetings, and we’re exploring ways we can help. While much good work has already been done by the League on behalf of our cities, over the course of the last few months, we have seen an increased level of inquires. As a result, we will examine how we perform this work to determine whether we need to add new services and support for members. As cities continue to grapple with the issues of race equity and injustice, the League remains devoted to contributing solutions that help heal our communities. Together with our members, we will work to achieve equity for all city residents. The New Face of Finance Lisa Sova began employment June 8 as an assistant finance director for the League of Minnesota Cities. In this new member outreach position, Sova will share information and expertise with city personnel on issues of municipal finance. Before coming to the League, Sova was the city administrator of Crosby and a member of the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust Board of Trustees. “Because I have worked in a city, I understand the challenges those in the field face,” said Sova. “I hope to help cities find financial solutions that move communities forward, even in difficult times.” With the development of Sova’s role, each department of the League will now offer a member services and outreach component dedicated to helping cities operate and lead effectively. Members are encouraged to contact Sova directly for one-on-one assistance or to offer thoughts on potential League initiatives and educational opportunities. A Renewed Focus on Race Equity SOME HIGHLIGHTS OF OUR RACE EQUITY-RELATED ACTIVITIES FROM THE PAST YEAR: October 2019 The League, along with 10 city officials, exhibited at the People of Color Career Fair to promote the advantages of city jobs. October 2019 The League adopted a new internal race equity strategic plan. As part of that plan, LMC formed a Race Equity Council consisting of six internal staff who help ensure that the League is addressing member needs on issues related to race equity. January 2020 LMC hosted six city officials to discuss diversity recruitment strategies with People of Color Career Fair organizer Sharon Smith-Akinsanya. Spring 2019 As racial disparities related to COVID-19 became clear, the League gathered resources for cities and shared them on its website, continually updating this information with new developments. Gov. Walz stopped by the League’s booth at the People of Color Career Fair in April to thank these city officials for their hard work. There’s No Place Like Home A remodel of the League’s home at Rice Street and University Avenue in St. Paul is underway. The first and most intensive phase wrapping up this fall will update the first and second story interiors to better meet operational needs and to create more spaces for members to use as extensions of their own city halls. Members will find that the building’s reception and general flow will be more welcoming and easier to navigate. Accessibility and safety features expected of today’s workplaces are also reflected in the design plan. A second phase of the plan will eventually reconfigure the top two floors of staff space with capacity, workflow, and safety in mind. Preliminary planning for the project began in 2015 by the League’s governing boards, and the project will be paid for in cash without taking on any debt. This is the first significant remodeling of the building since it opened in 1994. City officials can add a renovation reveal and “homecoming” to the list of post-pandemic events to (eventually) celebrate! ‘Build It Right’ Campaign Addresses Attacks on Local Control Publications released in 2018 and 2019 by a Minnesota building industry group made misleading and inaccurate attacks on city development fees and practices, prompting the League to launch the Build It Right campaign in 2019. With invaluable help from a team of passionate and experienced city officials, League staff compiled and analyzed accurate data about the cost of building and development fees compared to the price of a new home, and articulated the vital role of the city in ensuring the safety and livability of new development. The industry claims proved to be a preamble to legislation introduced in March and backed by the Builders Association of the Twin Cities, now known as Housing First Minnesota. League staff and city officials expressed their full opposition to these bills through legislative testimony, newspaper commentary pieces and letters to the editor, educational outreach, and social media. While the priorities of the Legislature quickly shifted to pandemic response, staff continue to monitor this issue to protect the ability of local elected officials to have a say in their community’s development. MINNESOTA CITIES FOR SAFE, QUALITY HOMES BUILD ITRIGHT FEDERAL ADVOCACY UPDATE During the National League of Cities (NLC) Congressional City Conference held each spring, League staff and Minnesota city officials typically meet with staff from each U.S. congressional district in the state and both U.S. Senate offices. These meetings provide opportunities for our members to strengthen relationships with our elected federal representatives. In early March, before the extent of the COVID-19 threat was known, League staff accompanied city officials from across the state to Washington, D.C., to attend this year’s conference and advocate for 2020 LMC federal priority issues like local decision- making authority, transportation, affordable housing, wireless siting, water and wastewater, and cable franchising. In addition to meeting with congressional staff, city officials met personally with six of the state’s eight U.S. Representatives and both U.S. Senators. Later in the spring, as the impact of the coronavirus on city finances became more evident, LMC teamed up with NLC to lobby Congress for direct assistance to alleviate revenue shortages among cities of all sizes. Additionally, LMC hosted webinars featuring Special Assistant to the President William Crozer and U.S. Sen. Tina Smith, who each fielded member questions about potential federal aid. LMC also produced a podcast featuring U.S. Reps. Angie Craig and Pete Stauber. Minnesota city officials and League staff at the Congressional City Conference in Washington, D.C., in early March. PRESIDENT Mike Mornson City Manager, City of Hopkins FIRST VICE PRESIDENT Brad WiersumMayor, City of Minnetonka SECOND VICE PRESIDENT Rita Albrecht Mayor, City of Bemidji(Served July-Dec. 2019) PAST PRESIDENT Heidi Omerza Councilmember, City of Ely DIRECTORS Curt BoganeyCity Manager, City of Brooklyn Center Amy Brendmoen Councilmember, City of St. Paul CHAIR D. Love Mayor, City of Centerville TRUSTEES Jake Benson Councilmember, City of Proctor Dave CallisterCity Manager, City of Plymouth Clinton Gridley City Administrator, City of Woodbury Lisa Sova City Administrator, City of Crosby (Served through April 2020) David UnmachtExecutive Director, League of Minnesota Cities Alison ZelmsDeputy City Manager, City of Mankato LMC Board of Directors, 2019–2020 LMCIT Board of Trustees, 2020 LMC & LMCIT Financial Highlights Our financial base continues to be strong, which allowed us to deliver the many resources and services we offered to you, our members, over the past year. Here are a few details: All LMC member cities renewed their membership in fiscal year (FY) 2019. Of the 853 cities in Minnesota, 98% were members of the League. The LMC Board of Directors approved a 0% membership dues schedule increase for FY 2021. LMC, including the Building Company, had a net position of $15.1 million and assets of $24.1 million. The League met its fiscal policy of maintaining a 25-35% general fund reserve of the following year’s total budgeted expenditures and transfers. LMCIT had a combined net position of $163 million and assets of $527 million. In December 2019, LMCIT’s property/casualty program distributed dividends totaling $2.5 million. Both LMC and LMCIT had clean audit opinion letters. * LMC numbers are the most recent audited numbers from fiscal year 2019 (9/1/18-8/31/19). ** LMCIT numbers reflect property/casualty program financials as of 5/31/19 and workers’ compensation program financials as of 12/31/19, the most recent audited numbers. Andrew JohnsonCouncilmember, City of Minneapolis D. Love Mayor, City of Centerville Jeff Lunde Mayor, City of Brooklyn Park Joshua Malchow City Clerk- Administrator, City of Slayton Margaret McCallum City Administrator, City of Mayer Justin Miller City Administrator, City of Lakeville Candy PetersenCouncilmember, City of North St. Paul Jeff PilonMayor, City of Nowthen Donna Schmitt Mayor, City of Columbia Heights Jim WeikumMayor, City of Biwabik CGMC REPRESENTATIVE Ron Johnson Councilmember, City of Bemidji METRO CITIES REPRESENTATIVE Mark McNeillCity Administrator, City of Mendota Heights MAOSC REPRESENTATIVE Mary McComber Mayor, City of Oak Park Heights LMC General Fund Expenditures & Transfers Total: $10,708,426* Salaries & Benefits Contractual Services Other Transfers to Capital Improvement Fund LMC General Fund Revenues Total: $11,084,414* LMCIT Cost Sharing Dues Other Institutional Fee LMCIT Expenses Total: $132,766,353** Claims General & Administrative Reinsurance Dividends LMCIT Revenues Total: $142,278,798** Premiums Investments Other 68% 13% 8% 11% 33% 30% 19% 18% 67% 22% 9% 2% 73% 1% 26% ©2020 League of Minnesota Cities. All Rights Reserved. 145 University Avenue West l St. Paul, MN 55103 l www.lmc.org MinnesotaCities #MnCities MinnesotaCitiesMOVIN G F O R W A R D T O G E T H E R 2019- 2 0 2 0 A N N U A L R E P O R T Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.L. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve New On-Sale Wine and 3.2 On-Sale Beer Liquor License for Bojae's LLC dba Bojae's Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve new On-Sale Wine and 3.2 On-Sale Beer Liquor License for Bojae's LLC dba Bojae's for period beginning September 21, 2021 through March 31, 2022. INTRODUCTION: Bojae's LLC applied for on-sale wine and 3.2 on-sale beer liquor licenses for Bojae's located at 4950 France Avenue South, previously Beaujo's Wine Bar & Bistro. Bojae's has new ownership. The Administration and Planning Departments reviewed the application and find that they comply with code requirements. The Health Department is satisfied with the applicant’s plan for storage and service. A background investigation was completed by the Police Department and Lt. White's findings are attached. Staff recommends approval of the liquor licenses. ATTACHMENTS: Description Police Dept. Background Investigation Report BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION SUMMARY LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION Establishment: Bojae's LLC (dba: Bojae's) License: On-Sale Wine, On-Sale 3.2 The Edina Police Department has conducted a background investigation relating to a City of Edina application for an On-Sale Wine and On-Sale 3.2 Liquor License. The application was submitted by Bojae's LLC (dba: Bojae's), which will operate at 4950 France Avenue in Edina. Bojae's LLC is registered with the State of Minnesota as a Limited Liability Company. Bojae's LLC is currently active and in good standing with the Minnesota Secretary of State. Bojae's LLC and/or its representatives have completed employee alcohol awareness training. Owners/Partners/Members: Johnson, Lyndsey Scheck Edina, MN The owners/partners/members have been investigated. No criminal records which would negatively affect their license application were found. Checks were made with the following databases and/or agencies: NCIC MNJIS Edina Police Department Hennepin County Minnesota Secretary of State Minnesota Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division From the information gathered during the course of the investigation, I have found nothing to preclude Bojae's LLC from obtaining this license. September 9, 2021 Lt. Aaron White Edina Police Department Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.M. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-78: Accepting Donations Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2021-78 accepting donations. INTRODUCTION: To comply with State Statute, all donations to the City must be accepted by resolution and approved by two- thirds majority of the Council. See attached resolution with list of donations. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-78: Accepting Donations RESOLUTION NO. 2021-78 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Parks & Recreation Kevra Piepho $3,200 Bench Donation for Bredesen Park Moria Olson $ 500 Tree Donation for Centennial Lakes Dated: September 21, 2021 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 21, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _______ day of ___________________, 2021. City Clerk Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: VII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Jennifer Garske, Executive Assistant Item Activity: Subject:Proclamation: Declaring September 17-23 Constitution Week Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion adopting the Proclamation declaring September 17-23 Constitution Week. INTRODUCTION: Diana Lynch from the Monument Chapter of the Daughters of the American Revolution will be present to receive the Proclamation. ATTACHMENTS: Description Proclamation: Declaring September 17-23 Constitution Week PROCLAMATION CONSTITUTION WEEK September 17-23, 2021 WHEREAS, it is the privilege of all Americans to commemorate the two hundred thirty fourth anniversary of the drafting of the Constitution of the United States of America with appropriate ceremonies and activities; and WHEREAS, it is fitting and proper to officially recognize this magnificent document and the anniversary of its creation; and WHEREAS, Public Law 915 guarantees the issuance of a proclamation by the President of the United States of America, designating September 17 through 23 as Constitution Week. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Edina, MN, hereby proclaim the week of September 17 through 23 as CONSTITUTION WEEK and urge all citizens to study the Constitution, reflect on the privilege of being an American with all the rights and responsibilities that privilege involves and reaffirm the ideals of the Constitution. Dated this 21st day of September 2021. _________________________________ Kevin Staunton, Acting Mayor Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: VII.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Tracy Petersen, Assistant Director-Recreation & Facilities Item Activity: Subject:Minnesota Recreation & Park Association Awards of Excellence Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None; information only. INTRODUCTION: Each year the Minnesota Recreation and Park Association (MRPA) recognizes agencies or organizations in Minnesota for outstanding achievements in the following "Award of Excellence" categories: · Administrative or Management Strategies · Marketing and Communications · Park and Facility · Programming and Events · Sponsorship and Partnerships · Volunteer Initiatives A major goal of the Awards of Excellence program is to increase public awareness and appreciation of the excellent parks, trails, and recreation services available in Minnesota. Public presentations of the awards are made before the agencies’ governing bodies throughout the summer and fall season. In May 2021, the Minnesota Recreation and Park Association selected the “Dear Edina”-A P en Pal Program and the RECtivity Box program for an Award of Excellence in the Programming and Events category and the Pumpkin Smash Bash event for an Award of Excellence in the Sponsorship and Partnerships category. The “Dear Edina-A Pen Pal P rogram was a collaborative effort between the Edina Senior Center, Edina Community Education and the Edina Library to provide an inter-generational program to foster one-on-one human connections while encouraging socialization during an isolating time for older adults during the pandemic. The RECtivity Box program provided a convenient, easy way for families to do recreation activities at home during the pandemic and also provided a way for the city to continue to connect safely with families during a time when our normal programs and events were not available. The Pumpkin Smash Bash was a joint effort between the P arks and Recreation Department, Edina Health Division, Edina Fire Department and Vierkant Disposal to promote the city’s new organics recycling program. The event offered organics recycling information and education and offered a fun, family-oriented activity that was safe. A representative from the Minnesota Recreation and Park Association will be in attendance to present these awards to the City of Edina. Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: VII.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Katie Laux, Graphic Designer Item Activity: Subject:2021 "Images of Edina" Presentation Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None; information only. INTRODUCTION: Each year, residents and employees who work in Edina are called to submit their favorite photos taken over the past year in the community in the "Images of Edina" photo contest. T he photos are judged on subject matter, composition, clarity, depth of field, lighting, quality of color or black and white, artistry and drama, degree of difficulty, Edina relevance and overall impact. From the submitted photos, judges chose the winning photographs in five categories: Business, P eople, Community Events, Places in Edina, and Plants & Animals. Once submissions were finished, the photos were published on Edina Magazine’s website for readers to vote for the Readers’ Choice Award Winner. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Presentation The CITYofEDINA2021 “Images of Edina” Photo Contest The CITYofEDINA“Images of Edina” categoriesEdinaMN.gov2•Activities & Events •Business•People•Places in Edina•Plants & Animals •Reader’s Choice•Best in Show The CITYofEDINAActivities & EventsEdinaMN.gov3“Trick or Treat” by Leah Steidl The CITYofEDINABusinessEdinaMN.gov4“Sweet Treat at Snuffy’s”by Patricia Willette The CITYofEDINAPeopleEdinaMN.gov5“A Curly Monkey”by Rebecca Peterson The CITYofEDINAPlaces in EdinaEdinaMN.gov6“The Streaks of 62”by Yash Mangalick The CITYofEDINAPlants & AnimalsEdinaMN.gov7“Visible Breath of Wren song -Proud of his Edina House, too”by Martin Freeman The CITYofEDINAReaders’ ChoiceEdinaMN.gov8“A Curly Monkey”by Rebecca Peterson The CITYofEDINABest in ShowEdinaMN.gov9“Visible Breath of Wren song -Proud of his Edina House, too”by Martin Freeman Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: VIII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: New On-Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale Liquor Licenses for Olive's Fresh Pizza Bar Edina, LLC dba Olive's Fresh Pizza Bar Edina Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve new On-Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale Liquor Licenses for Olive's Fresh Pizza Bar Edina, LLC dba Olive's Fresh P izza Bar Edina a restaurant located at 5820 Lincoln Drive, Edina. INTRODUCTION: Olive's Fresh Pizza Bar Edina, LLC dba Olive's Fresh Pizza Bar Edina is a restaurant located at 5820 Lincoln Drive, Edina. Opening was scheduled for October but this has been delayed until end of year or early 2022 because of supply chain delays. Olive's will be a full service restaurant with table service, delivery and to go options. Staff reviewed the application and find that it complies with code requirements. A background investigation was completed by the police department and is attached. Staff recommends approval of the liquor licenses. Staff is requesting Council approval immediately instead of carrying over this item to the next Council meeting for approval. ATTACHMENTS: Description Background Investigation Summary by PD BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION SUMMARY LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION Establishment: Olive's Fresh Pizza Bar Edina LLC (dba: Olive's Fresh Pizza Bar) License: On-Sale License (full), On-Sale Sunday The Edina Police Department has conducted a background investigation relating to a City of Edina application for an On-Sale (full) and On-Sale Sunday Liquor License. The application was submitted by Olive's Fresh Pizza Bar Edina LLC (dba: Olive's Fresh Pizza Bar), which will operate at 5820 Lincoln Drive in Edina. Olive's Fresh Pizza Bar Edina LLC is registered with the State of Minnesota as a Limited Liability Company. Olive's Fresh Pizza Bar Edina LLC is currently active and in good standing with the Minnesota Secretary of State. Olive's Fresh Pizza Bar Edina LLC and/or its representatives are aware of the City of Edina's requirement relating to employee alcohol awareness training. The training has not yet been scheduled. Owners/Partners/Members: Marshall, John Nelson Edina, MN Smith Jr., Perry Duff Tonka Bay, MN Hopkins-Ricci, Jacob Allen Roseville, MN The owners/partners/members have been investigated. No criminal records which would negatively affect their license application were found. Checks were made with the following databases and/or agencies: NC1C MNJIS Edina Police Department Hennepin County Minnesota Secretary of State Minnesota Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division From the information gathered during the course of the investigation, I have found nothing to preclude Olive's Fresh Pizza Bar Edina LLC from obtaining this license. August 13, 2021 Lt. Aaron White Edina Police Department Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:New Consumption & Display Permit for Wooden Hill Brewing Company LLC dba Wooden Hill Brewing Company Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve new Consumption & Display Permit for Wooden Hill Brewing Company LLC dba Wooden Hill Brewing Company. INTRODUCTION: The public hearing was closed at noon on September 13 and no comments were received. Wooden Hill Brewing Company request is for a Consumption and Display Permit to offer patrons other intoxicating beverage options. P atrons will be able to bring in their own intoxicating beverages for consumption. ATTACHMENTS: Description Background Summary Consumption & Display Ordinance Staff Presentation, Sept. 9 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION SUMMARY Consumption and Display Permit Establishment: Wooden Hill Brewing Company LLC License: Consumption and Display Permit In June 2021, the Edina Police Department began a background investigation relating to a City of Edina application for a Consumption and Display permit. The application was submitted by Wooden Hill Brewing Company LLC. dba Wooden Hill Brewing Company operates from 7421 Bush Lake Road, Edina. Wooden Hill Brewing Company LLC is authorized to do business in Minnesota and is registered with the State of Minnesota. Wooden Hill Brewing Company LLC is currently active and in good standing with the Minnesota Secretary of State. Wooden Hill Brewing Company LLC currently has a Brewer Taproom license in good standing with the City of Edina. Wooden Hill Brewing Company LLC and/or its representatives are aware of the City of Edina's requirement relating to employee alcohol awareness training. Owners/Partners/IV1embers: Wooden Hill Brewing Company LLC: Sean Stuart Ewen Miami, FL James Stuart Ewen Bloomington, MN The owners/partners/members have been investigated. No criminal records which would negatively affect their license application were found. Checks were made with the following agencies: NCIC MINCIS Hennepin County Minnesota Secretary of State Minnesota Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division From the information gathered during the course of the investigation, I found nothing to prevent, Wooden Hill Brewing Company LLC from obtaining a Consumption and Display Permit. I would support a positive recommendation from the Police Department in regard to the issuance of this license. Lt. Dan Conboy #183 ORDINANCE NO. 2020-02 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 4 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 4 Section 4-4 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following provision: 4-4 Consumption and Display Permits (a) Consumption and Display Permits issued by the Commissioner of Public Safety shall be consented to or disproved as provided in Minnesota Statutes 340A.414 Subd. 5. The City's fee for consent to the Permit is $300.00. (b) The City may issue a one-day permit for the consumption and display of intoxicating liquor to a nonprofit organization in conjunction with a social activity in the City sponsored by the organization. The permit must be approved by the Commissioner of Public Safety and is valid only for the day indicated on the permit. The fee for the permit is $25.00. The City may not issue more than ten such permits in any one year. (c) The City may attach conditions to consent to a permit or the issuance of a one day permit by the City. (d) Other terms and conditions of this Chapter shall apply to consumption and display permits. The hearing requirement of City Code Section 4-7-2 apply to permits issued by the Commissioner of Public Safety that are subject approval by the City but not to one day permits issued by the City and approved by the Commissioner of Public Safety. Section 2. This ordinance is effective upon adoption. 1 206045v2 CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2020 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2020. City Clerk 3 206045v2 aures Hovland, Mayor First Reading: Jan. 22, 2020 Second Reading: Feb. 19, 2020 Published: Feb. 27, 2020 • Shar Y A iso(City Clerk Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk 206045v2 2 Consumption & Display PermitPublic Hearing – September 9, 2021 Permit Request•Wooden Hill Brewing Company•Current liquor license: Brewer TaproomEdinaMN.gov2 Consumption & Display Permit•What it is•What is allowed•What is not allowed•Staff concerns•Council actionEdinaMN.gov3 What is a Consumption & Display Permit?•Simple definition•To allow patrons to bring their own intoxicating beverages into an establishment to drinkEdinaMN.gov4 What is allowed with a permit?•All bottles always in plain sight of patron/owner(s)•All bottles always in patron/owner(s) possession and control•Consumption & Display is allowed every day, all day when establishment is open•Bar attendant/employee can serve liquid to the bottle owner for mixing intoxicating beverages•Minors must be with parent or guardian•Inspection by AGE and Edina PoliceEdinaMN.gov5 •Selling intoxicating beverages•‘Pour and Store’•Bar attendant or employees cannot take bottles to serve patron/owner(s)•Bottles cannot be stored on premises for patron/owner(s)•Establishment cannot buy intoxicating beverages for patrons•Consume or display between 1:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. (unless they have a 2 a.m. license)What is not allowed with permit?EdinaMN.gov6 Concerns•Permit holder is not serving intoxicating beverages•No direct control over intoxicating person continuing to drink•Prevent minors from drinking•No police or security presence like we require for temporary intoxicating licenseEdinaMN.gov7 Action •City Council may attach conditions, example•Probation for one year•Security at events•Staff’s recommendation•To close the public hearing at noon on Sept. 13 and continue action to the Sept. 21 City Council meeting.EdinaMN.gov8 Consumption & Display Permit•Any questions?EdinaMN.gov9 Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Jessica V. Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Bristol & Mavelle Park/Lynmar Basin Stormwater Project Concept Plan Summary Report Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the concept plan. INTRODUCTION: The City has partnered with the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District to study options for providing stormwater improvements at Bristol & Mavelle Park, also referred to as Lynmar Basin. The project was introduced to the Council at the April 20, 2021 City Council meeting. The goals of the project are to: Improve the water quality of Lake Edina, and downstream water resources Reduce flood risk in the South Cornelia neighborhood Enhance natural resources, including improving pollinator habitat Keep a portion of the space open for passive recreation Consult residents in the process The project webpage can be found at www.BetterTogetherEdina.org/bristol-mavelle-park. Upon City Council approval, the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Board of Managers will consider authorizing District staff to undertake a feasibility study. ATTACHMENTS: Description Concept Plan Summary Report Staff Presentation 4300 MarketPointe Drive, Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55435 952.832.2600 www.barr.com Lynmar Basin Stormwater Retrofit Concept Plan DRAFT Concept Rendering Prepared for Nine Mile Creek Watershed District September 2021 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271725 Lake Cornelia WQ Improvements\_03 Lynmar Basin Stormwater Retrofit\WorkFiles\Phase 1 - Summary Report\Lynmar Basin_ConceptPlan_SummaryReport_090921.docx i Lynmar Basin Stormwater Retrofit Concept Plan September 2021 Contents 1 Introduction and Project Background ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Background ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Conceptual Design ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Public Engagement Process ............................................................................................................................................ 3 2.1.1 Project Website and Survey ............................................................................................................................ 3 2.1.2 Community Events .............................................................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Summary of Conceptual Design .................................................................................................................................... 3 3 Project Cost and Benefits .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Opinion of Probable Cost ................................................................................................................................................. 6 3.2 Project Benefits ..................................................................................................................................................................... 6 3.2.1 Water Quality ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 3.2.2 Flood Risk Reduction ......................................................................................................................................... 8 3.2.3 Co-Benefits ............................................................................................................................................................ 8 4 Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................................10 4.1 Conclusions ..........................................................................................................................................................................10 4.2 Recommendations and Next Steps ............................................................................................................................10 ii List of Appendices Appendix A Public Engagement Survey Results Appendix B Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Cost iii Acronyms AACE Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering MIDS Minimal Impact Design Standards MPCA Minnesota Pollution Control Agency NMCWD Nine Mile Creek Watershed District UAA Use Attainability Analysis 1 1 Introduction and Project Background 1.1 Introduction This report summarizes the results of the conceptual design phase for the retrofit of Lynmar Basin in Edina. This summary report includes a description of the project site, the findings from the public engagement process, the conceptual site design drawings, an engineer’s opinion of probable cost, and a summary of project benefits, including water quality, flood reduction, and other co-benefits. 1.2 Project Background The Lynmar Basin is a low-lying, open space area between Lynmar Lane and Bristol Boulevard that receives stormwater from a 20-acre residential watershed (see Figure 1-1). The Lynmar Basin, located in the Lake Edina watershed, currently serves as a dry pond, providing flood detention but minimal water quality benefits. This location was identified as a potential site to implement stormwater best management practices in the Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina Water Quality Improvement Project, Feasibility Study/Preliminary Engineering Report to reduce stormwater volume and pollutants to downstream Lake Edina. The objective of the project is to retrofit the site to enhance stormwater volume reduction and water quality treatment within the park through increased infiltration and reduce flood risk for nearby properties. Other project objectives include enhancing nature resources and wildlife habitat, enhancing active and passive recreation opportunities within the park, and providing educational opportunities for park users. The project scope was approved by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (NMCWD) at their April 1, 2021 meeting. 2 Figure 1-1 Project Location. Lynmar Basin is a low-lying, turfed/natural area just south of Mavelle Drive, between Bristol Boulevard and Lynmar Lane. 3 2 Conceptual Design 2.1 Public Engagement Process Community engagement and outreach were important components of this phase of the project. The community engagement process was developed to help the design team better understand existing conditions, public issues and needs, and to help inform conceptual design plans for consideration. 2.1.1 Project Website and Survey The City of Edina developed a project website and engagement hub for this project to provide interested individuals access to project information and updates. The site, part of the city’s Better Together Edina public engagement platform, also provided a method to receive feedback from interested public. A survey was developed by the City of Edina, in conjunction with NMCWD, to better understand current park use and values and perceptions regarding the existing park space. The survey was administered via the project page on the Better Together Edina website. A copy of the survey questions and responses is included as Appendix A. 2.1.2 Community Events Several community events were held in-person at Lynmar Basin to solicit feedback and answer questions from interested residents and property owners. An initial open house meeting was held on April 20, 2021 in which NMCWD, City of Edina, and Barr staff heard from local residents regarding their thoughts on how the park is used and concerns and questions about the potential retrofit project. Information gathered during this event was used to develop two initial design concepts. The initial design concepts were shared with interested residents at a community meeting on July 13, 2021, also attended by NMCWD, City of Edina, and Barr staff. Feedback received from residents was generally positive and was used to inform the final design concept summarized in this report. 2.2 Summary of Conceptual Design The stormwater retrofit design concept consists of grading and lowering the bottom of the existing basin by approximately one foot to promote stormwater infiltration and increase flood storage. The proposed design concept will alter the character of the existing park space, so receiving feedback from neighboring residents and park users was especially important. Feedback obtained from residents prior to developing initial design concepts included the following requests: • Minimize tree removal, especially the trees along the park perimeter that serve as screening from the France Avenue commercial district • Maintain a portion of the existing park space for passive park recreation, such as picnicking, sledding, and unorganized field play (e.g., playing catch or frisbee) • Be mindful of neighborhood safety considerations, with a goal to minimize potential for loitering • Avoid increasing the risk of flooding, including basement flooding 4 The conceptual design process generated three options. Two initial concept plans were developed and presented to NMCWD and City of Edina staff for review and comment in late-June, and further refined based on feedback received from residents. Incorporating the feedback received, a third and final concept was developed and is presented in this report. The two intial concepts included variations in the type of plantings (grasses for simplicity and ease of maintenance or a more ornamental plant palette) and the alignment of a path. To create local sidewalk connections through the park, options included a path that lowers down into the basin or a path that generally remains along the northeast edge of the park. As indicated above, two initial design concepts were shared with interested residents at a community meeting on July 13, 2021. Attendees generally preferred the concept with the ornamental plantings and a path that runs along the northeast side of the park. The public also expressed support for maintaining a large area of turf grass on the north side of the park for recreation. Overall, attendees were amenable to the proposed removal of a limited number trees. However, there was concern expressed by at least one attendee regarding removal of two large cottonwood trees located in the center of the proposed basin. The final concept design is shown in Figure 2-1, revised to reflect feedback received at the July community meeting and follow up discussion with NMCWD and City of Edina staff. One of the revisions incorporated into the final design was a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk (versus an 8-foot width). City staff indicated this width would be most appropriate, as this pedestrian connection will likely be considered part of the Safe Routes to School program and thus the 5-foot width would be consistent with surrounding sidewalks. Upon further consideration and discussion regarding tree loss, it was confirmed that it will be necessary to remove the large cottonwood trees due to the proposed lowering of the basin bottom and the location of the tree(s) in association with the inlet and outlet structures from the basin. While not withstanding, it is noteworthy that the large, fast-growing cottonwood trees were not originally planted, but rather seeded themselves decades ago. The three conceptual designs developed and considered all offered similar flood reduction and water quality benefits. Benefits of the final design concept are discussed in subsequent sections. Landscape Edging LYNMAR BASIN Turf area Proposed Tamarack, typ. Existing trees to be protected Existing trees to be removed Proposed 5’ concrete path Mow strip along path Rain garden planting; Complex plant palette; Grasses, perennials, shrubs and trees 6 3 Project Cost and Benefits 3.1 Opinion of Probable Cost A planning-level opinion of probable cost was developed for the Lynmar Basin conceptual design. The opinion of probable cost, summarized in Table 3-1, generally corresponds to standards established by the American Association of Civil Engineers (AACE). Class 3 opinions of cost were used based on the level of project definition, the use of parametric models to calculate estimated costs (i.e., making use of order-of- magnitude costs from similar projects), and uncertainty with an acceptable range of between -15% and +20% of the estimated project cost. A more detailed opinion of probable cost is provided in Appendix B. 3.2 Project Benefits The Lynmar Basin stormwater retrofit concept design will provide multiple benefits, including reduced stormwater runoff and pollutant loading to downstream Lake Edina (through infiltration) and reduced frequency of flooding at the intersection of Hazelton Road and Lynmar Lane. Additional co-benefits include enhanced nature resources and wildlife habitat, enhanced active and passive recreation opportunities within the park, and educational opportunities for park users. Figure 3-1 graphically summarizes the key benefits from the proposed project. 3.2.1 Water Quality The water quality benefits of the concept-level infiltration basin were estimated using the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) calculator. The proposed infiltration basin will reduce the amount of stormwater discharged to downstream Lake Edina, with a 91% average annual reduction in stormwater runoff from the 20-acre watershed tributary to Lynmar Basin. The estimated annual total phosphorus removal is approximately 13 pounds. The estimated annualized cost per pound of total phosphorus removed is summarized in Table 3-1. Table 3-1 Lynmar Basin Stormwater Retrofit Planning-Level Cost Estimate and Cost/Benefit Proposed Project Planning-Level Cost Estimate1 Concept Level Cost Range (-15% - +20%) Estimated Life of Project Estimated Annualized Cost per Pound TP Removed2 Lynmar Basin Stormwater Retrofit $898,000 $763,000 - $1,078,000 30 years $4,300 1 Concept-level cost estimates do not include annual costs for operations and maintenance. Estimated costs do include engineering, design, and construction administration estimates (25%) and 30% construction contingency. 2 Concept-level estimated annualized cost per pound total phosphorus removed assumes an annual maintenance cost of approximately 10% of estimated construction costs and an inflation rate of 3%. FLOOD REDUCTION PARK IMPROVEMENTS EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES Reduces frequency of street flooding More water is captured and soaks in during large rain events HABITAT ENHANCEMENTS Demonstrates innovative stormwater management Educates through interpretive signs and programming Improves aesthetics Enhances park experience with walking path and benches Increases native plant diversity Benefits pollinators by adding food sources and nesting sites Promotes carbon sequestration Removes nutrients, sediment, and other pollutants Protects downstream lakes and creek Recharges groundwater STORMWATER RUNOFF REDUCTION LYNMAR BASIN STORMWATER PROJECT BENEFITS The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and City of Edina are conducting a project to enhance the existing park space and improve stormwater management. The project will have multiple benefits, including reducing street flooding in the neighborhood and improving the health of our local downstream waterbodies. PRIMARY BENEFITS SECONDARY BENEFITS Find additional project information at https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/bristol-mavelle-park Final design concept 8 3.2.2 Flood Risk Reduction In large storm events, flooding can occur at the intersection of Hazelton Road and Lynmar Lane, just east of the Lynmar Basin. The City of Edina’s XP-SWMM model was used to evaluate the reduction in flood elevations resulting from the Lynmar Basin stormwater retrofit concept design. Table 3-2 summarizes the estimated flood elevations in Lynmar Basin and the adjacent low area at the intersection of Hazelton Road and Lynmar Lane. Scenario 10-year, 24-hour Peak Surface Water Elevation (feet MSL) 100-year, 24-hour Peak Surface Water Elevation (feet MSL) Existing Conditions 851.2 854.4 Proposed Concept Plan 850.0 853.9 Difference 1.2 feet 0.5 feet Figure 3-2 shows a comparison of approximate inundation extents for the 10- and 100-year, 24-hour rainfall event under existing and proposed conditions. Under existing conditions, a 10-year, 24-hour rainfall event results in inundation of Lynmar Basin and the street in the adjacent intersection of Hazelton Road and Lynmar Lane. Under proposed conditions, inundation from the 10-year, 24-hour rainfall is reduced such that it stays within the Lynmar Basin and does not extend into the roadway. Note that containing the runoff in Lynmar Basin, as shown to the right in Figure 3-2, assumes that the surface overflow between the roadway and Lynmar Basin is lowered so runoff from the intersection can flow into Lynmar Basin. Figure 3-2. Comparison of flood inundation extents for the 100- and 10-year, 24 hour rainfall events. Under existing conditions a 100-year, 24-hour rainfall results in inundation that extends to include a larger portion of the roadway and the private property to the northeast of the roadway. Under proposed 9 conditions, the increased flood storage volume in Lynmar Basin results in a lower flood elevation; however, the predicted inundation still extends to the structures on private property to the northeast of the roadway. 3.2.3 Co-Benefits Beyond the flood reduction and water quality benefits, the final concept design provides additional co- benefits, which include the added aesthetic value to the park, the local pedestrian connection via the added path, additional native plant diversity and enhanced habitat for pollinators and other wildlife. The proposed project also provides opportunities for public education through demonstration of stormwater management practices and interpretive signage. 10 4 Summary 4.1 Conclusions The stormwater retrofit design concept consists of grading and lowering the bottom of the existing dry basin by approximately one foot to promote stormwater infiltration and increase flood storage. The conceptual design for stormwater retrofit of the Lynmar Basin meets multiple project objectives, including enhancing stormwater volume reduction and water quality treatment within the park and reducing flood risk for nearby properties. The proposed infiltration basin reduces the average annual runoff from the 20- acre watershed by approximately 91% and reduces the phosphorus loading to downstream Lake Edina by approximately 13 pounds per year, on average. The proposed Lynmar Basin retrofit design increases flood storage, eliminating street flooding in the 10-year, 24-hour rainfall event and reducing flood elevations in the 100-year event. Other project benefits include enhanced nature resources and wildlife habitat, enhanced active and passive recreation opportunities within the park, and educational opportunities for park users. The proposed design concept will alter the character of the existing park space, so receiving feedback from neighboring residents and park users was especially important. Through a public engagement process developed in conjunction with the City of Edina, information on current park use, resident values and perceptions regarding the existing park space, and concerns about park modifications was gathered and carefully considered. Initial conceptual designs were shared with interested residents for review and comment to gage and promote public support for the proposed project. Feedback received from residents was generally positive and was used to inform the final design concept summarized in this report. 4.2 Recommendations and Next Steps Upon approval of the design concept by the NMCWD and City of Edina, the recommended next step is to conduct a more detailed feasibility study. Building off the work conducted as part of the conceptual design, the feasibility study will further evaluate the feasibility of increasing infiltration in this location and refine and optimize the design to maximize the project benefits. It is recommended that the feasibility study include the following tasks: • Soil borings to confirm infiltration capacity of site soils • Evaluation of potential impacts of increased infiltration on neighboring properties • Further analysis of basin sizing to optimize water quality and flood reduction benefits, including evaluation of options to increase tributary drainage area to proposed basin (i.e. evaluate directing additional runoff to the Lynmar Basin). • Site survey Appendices Appendix A Public Engagement Survey Results Summary Report 23 March 2021 - 09 August 2021 Better Together Edina PROJECTS SELECTED: 1 Bristol & Mavelle Park/Lynmar Basin Stormwater Project FULL LIST AT THE END OF THE REPORT Highlights TOTAL VISITS 362 MAX VISITORS PER DAY 35 NEW REGISTRATI ONS0 ENGAGED VISITORS 15 INFORMED VISITORS 118 AWARE VISITORS 270 Visitors Summary Pageviews Visitors 1 May '21 1 Jul '21 25 50 75 Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 23 March 2021 to 09 August 2021 PARTICIPANT SUMMARY ENGAGED INFORMED AWARE 15 ENGAGED PARTICIPANTS 000 1202 000 000 000 000 001 000 003 Registered Unverified Anonymous Contributed on Forums Participated in Surveys Contributed to Newsfeeds Participated in Quick Polls Posted on Guestbooks Contributed to Stories Asked Questions Placed Pins on Places Contributed to Ideas* A single engaged participant can perform multiple actions Bristol & Mavelle Park/Lynmar Basin Stormwater Project…15 (5.6%) (%) * Calculated as a percentage of total visits to the Project ENGAGED INFORMED AWARE 118 INFORMED PARTICIPANTS 0 17 35 7 24 0 78 15 Participants Viewed a video Viewed a photo Downloaded a document Visited the Key Dates page Visited an FAQ list Page Visited Instagram Page Visited Multiple Project Pages Contributed to a tool (engaged) * A single informed participant can perform multiple actions Bristol & Mavelle Park/Lynmar Basin Stormwater Project…118 (43.7%) (%) * Calculated as a percentage of total visits to the Project ENGAGED INFORMED AWARE 270 AWARE PARTICIPANTS 270 Participants Visited at least one Page * Aware user could have also performed an Informed or Engaged Action Bristol & Mavelle Park/Lynmar Basin Stormwater Project…270 * Total list of unique visitors to the project Page 2 of 7 FORUM TOPICS SUMMARY TOP 3 FORUM TOPICS BASED ON CONTRIBUTORS SURVEYS SUMMARY TOP 3 SURVEYS BASED ON CONTRIBUTORS NEWSFEEDS SUMMARY TOP 3 NEWSFEEDS BASED ON VISITORS Q & A SUMMARY TOP 3 Q & A BASED ON CONTRIBUTORS Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 23 March 2021 to 09 August 2021 ENGAGEMENT TOOLS SUMMARY 2 FORUM TOPICS 2 SURVEYS 12 NEWS FEEDS 0 QUICK POLLS 0 GUESTBOOKS 0 STORIES 1 Q&A'S 1 PLACES 1 2 Forum Topics 0 Contributors 0 Contributions Community Meeting - share initial concept design ideas 0 Contributors to Open House - April 20 0 Contributors to 2 Surveys 14 Contributors 14 Submissions Initial Feedback Survey (2 min) 14 Contributors to Input on Initial Concepts 0 Contributors to 12 NewsFeed 10 Visits 9 Visitors Bristol & Mavelle Park, also known as Lynmar basin 5 Visitors to Photos 2 Visitors to Community Meeting - July 13th 2 Visitors to 1 Q&As 1 Contributors 1 Questions Questions and Answers 1 Contributors to Page 3 of 7 PLACES SUMMARY TOP 3 PLACES BASED ON CONTRIBUTORS IDEAS SUMMARY TOP 3 IDEAS BASED ON CONTRIBUTORS Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 23 March 2021 to 09 August 2021 ENGAGEMENT TOOLS SUMMARY 1 Places 0 Contributors 0 Pins Bristol & Mavelle Park/Lynmar Basin 0 Contributors to 1 Ideas 3 Contributors 3 Contributions Initial Reactions 3 Contributed to Page 4 of 7 DOCUMENTS TOP 3 DOCUMENTS BASED ON DOWNLOADS PHOTOS TOP 3 PHOTOS BASED ON VIEWS FAQS TOP 3 FAQS BASED ON VIEWS KEY DATES TOP 3 KEY DATES BASED ON VIEWS Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 23 March 2021 to 09 August 2021 INFORMATION WIDGET SUMMARY 3 DOCUMENTS 7 PHOTOS 0 VIDEOS 1 FAQS 1 KEY DATES 3 Documents 35 Visitors 69 Downloads Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina Feasibility Study Report 45 Downloads Participation Plan.pdf 14 Downloads Initial Concepts Layouts_July 2021 10 Downloads 7 Photos 17 Visitors 53 Views 2018-09-20 Severe Rainstorm 1.JPG 9 Views 2020-07-03 Severe Rainstorm 1.JPG 10 Views Park aerial photo.PNG 9 Views 1 Faqs 24 Visitors 26 Views Bristol & Mavelle Park/Lynmar Basin Stormwater Project 26 Views 1 Key Dates 7 Visitors 7 Views Bristol & Mavelle Park/Lynmar Basin Stormwater Project 7 Views Page 5 of 7 REFERRER URL Visits www.google.com 117 www.edinamn.gov 13 duckduckgo.com 7 edinaschools.schoology.com 7 l.instagram.com 6 docs.google.com 5 m.facebook.com 5 www.ninemilecreek.org 5 www.bangthetable.com 4 t.co 2 www.google.ca 2 l.facebook.com 1 search.yahoo.com 1 www.bing.com 1 www.facebook.com 1 Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 23 March 2021 to 09 August 2021 TRAFFIC SOURCES OVERVIEW Page 6 of 7 PROJECT TITLE AWARE INFORMED ENGAGED Bristol & Mavelle Park/Lynmar Basin Stormwater Project 270 118 15 Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 23 March 2021 to 09 August 2021 SELECTED PROJECTS - FULL LIST Page 7 of 7 Appendix B Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Cost PREPARED BY: BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY SHEET: 1 OF 1 BY:KJN2 DATE:9/2/2021 FEASIBILITY STUDY CHECKED BY: MEK2 DATE: ENGINEER'S OPINION OF COST APPROVED BY: DATE: PROJECT:Lynmar Stormwater Retrofit ISSUED:DATE: LOCATION:Edina, MN ISSUED:DATE: PROJECT #:23/27-1725.03 ISSUED:DATE: OPINION OF COST - SUMMARY ISSUED:DATE: Engineer's Opinion of Cost Lynmar Stormwater Retrofit DRAFT ESTIMATED ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT COST ITEM COST NOTES Mobilization LS 1 $49,300.00 $49,300.001,2,3,4,5,6 Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Control Measures LS 1 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 Construction Layout and Staking LS 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 Erosion and Sediment Control LS 1 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 Clearing and Grubbing LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 Remove Tree and Stump (12" - 24" Diameter)Each 6 $750.00 $4,500.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter LF 20 $8.00 $160.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 Common Excavation CY 5,580 $19.00 $106,020.001,2,3,4,5,6 Off Site Disposal of Excavated Material CY 4,830 $18.00 $86,940.001,2,3,4,5,6 Soil Loosening - 18" Depth SY 3,020 $2.00 $6,040.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 Planting Soil (12" depth - 75% sand, 25% leaf compost - MnDOT Grade II)CY 1,010 $70.00 $70,700.001,2,3,4,5,6 Furnish and Install MnDOT 3877 Type B Topsoil CY 760 $50.00 $38,000.001,2,3,4,5,6 72" Storm Manhole with SAFL Baffle Each 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.001,2,3,4,5,6 Construct Energy Dissipation Pad Each 1 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 4" Concrete Sidewalk with Compacted Class V Base SY 351 $90.00 $31,600.001,2,3,4,5,6 Turf Seeding SY 5,621 $3.00 $16,863.001,2,3,4,5,6 Erosion Control Blanket SY 2,400 $3.00 $7,200.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 3" Twice Shredded Hardwood Mulch CY 670 $55.00 $36,850.001,2,3,4,5,6 Straw Mulch SY 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 Custom Native Seed Mix with Cover Crop AC 1 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 Herbaceous Plugs Each 800 $4.00 $3,200.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 Herbaceous Plant (#1 Cont.)Each 1,100 $17.00 $18,700.001,2,3,4,5,6 Shrub (#2 Cont.)Each 150 $45.00 $6,750.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 Deciduous Tree (#20, Cont.)Each 18 $480.00 $8,640.00 1,2,3,4,5,6 4" Steel Landscape Edging LF 840 $10.00 $8,400.00 1,2,3,4,5,7 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $552,000.001,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY (30%)$166,000.001,4,8 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $718,000.001,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 ENGINEERING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION (25%)$179,500.001,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COST $898,0001,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 -15%$764,000 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 20%$1,078,0001,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 Notes 8 Estimate costs are reported to nearest thousand dollars. ESTIMATED ACCURACY RANGE 4 This design level (Class 3, 10 - 40% design completion per ASTM E 2516-11) cost estimate is based on concept designs, alignments, quantities and unit prices. Costs will change with further design. Time value-of-money escalation costs are not included. A construction schedule is not available at this time. Contingency is an allowance for the net sum of costs that will be in the Final Total Project Cost at the time of the completion of design, but are not included at this level of project definition. The estimated accuracy range for the Total Project Cost as the project is defined is -15% to +20%. The accuracy range is based on professional judgement considering the level of design completed, the complexity of the project and the uncertainties in the project as scoped. The contingency and the accuracy range are not intended to include costs for future scope changes that are not part of the project as currently scoped or costs for risk contingency. Operation and Maintenance costs are not included. 5 Estimate assumes that projects will not be located on contaminated soil. 6 Estimate costs are to design, construct, and permit each alternative. The estimated costs do not include maintenance, monitoring or additional tasks following construction. 7 Furnish and Install pipe cost per linear foot includes all trenching, bedding, backfilling, compaction, and disposal of excess materials 1 Quantities based on Design Work Completed (10 - 40%). 2 Unit Prices Based on Information Available at This Time. 3 Limited Soil Boring and Field Investigation Information Available. P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271725 Lake Cornelia WQ Improvements\_03 Lynmar Basin Stormwater Retrofit\WorkFiles\Cost Estimate\Lynmar_Engineers Opinion of Probable Cost_DRAFT_090621.xlsx 1 Bristol & Mavelle Park / Lynmar BasinStormwater ProjectCity Council MeetingSeptember 21, 2021 1.Project Goals2.Project Purpose, Funding, and Decision to be Made3.Public Engagement4.Concept Design and Public Influence5.Project Cost and Benefits6.Next Steps and DiscussionEdinaMN.gov2OutlineStaff & Consultants•Jessica Wilson -Water Resources Coordinator•Ross Bintner - Engineering Services Manager•Tom Swenson -Assistant Director Parks•Randy Anhorn, Administrator, Nine Mile Creek Watershed District•Janna Kieffer – Senior Water Resources Engineer, Barr Engineering•Matt Kumka - Landscape Architect, Barr Engineering The City of Edina is partnering with the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District to study options for providing stormwater improvements.•The project goals are to;•Improve the water quality of Lake Edina, and downstream water resources•Reduce flood risk in the South Cornelia neighborhood•Enhance natural resources, including improving pollinator habitat•Keep a portion of the space open for passive recreation•Consult residents in the processwww.bettertogetheredina.org/Bristol-mavelle-parkProject GoalsEdinaMN.gov3 Project purpose, funding, and decision to be made•Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina are not meeting clean water goals. Both have had recent recreational advisories due to blue-green algae blooms.•Nine Mile Creek Watershed District studied sources of pollution and recommendations to improve Lake Cornelia and Lake Edina in 2019 and 2020.•Nine Mile Creek Watershed District has levied and grant funds to implement capital improvements to improve the water quality of Lake Edina.•Decide to be made - whether to proceed with project and approve concept-level design.EdinaMN.gov4 EdinaMN.gov5 April 2021 public participation plan.Goal: To obtain public feedback on current uses of the park, project analysis, alternatives, and/or decisions. Engagement strategy will include informing residents on the proposed clean water, flood risk reduction, and natural resource benefits.Promise: We will keep the public informed, listen to and acknowledge concerns and aspirations, and provide feedback on how public input influenced the decision.EdinaMN.gov6Engagement – Promise to the Public and Process EdinaMN.gov7CONCEPT RENDERINGLynmar LaneBristol BoulevardMavelle Dr EdinaMN.gov8 EdinaMN.gov9 Engagement -What we’ve heard•General support for the primary benefits - stormwater runoff collection and flood risk reduction.•General support for the secondary benefits – habitat enhancements, park improvements, and educational opportunities.•Keep open space for unstructured play•Protect high value trees and plant additional trees where you can•Protect people from floodingEdinaMN.gov10 Used•Path alignment and width•No retaining wall•Make planted area look intentional•Plant new trees, flowering trees, shrubs, and plants•Make it easy to maintain•Save trees along the edges•Optimize remaining open space for passive recreation (football, frisbee, soccer, sledding)EdinaMN.gov11Engagement – How input was used or not usedNot Used•Proposed removal of two large cottonwoods at bottom of the basin remains part of the concept plan•Proposed removal of one tree along edge remains part of the concept plan EdinaMN.gov12 EdinaMN.gov13Schedule / Next Steps•Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (NMCWD) Board has conditionally approved the concept plan and authorized staff to undertake a feasibility study pending City Council approval.•Detailed feasibility study.•Soil borings•Site survey•Impacts analysis•Optimization of basin sizing, piping, and grading•NMCWD holds public hearing on feasibility study then considers ordering project.•City and NMCWD negotiate cooperative agreement. City Council considers approval.•Potential design/bid in winter 2021/2022.•Potential construction in 2022. Discussion / QuestionsEdinaMN.gov14 Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Ross Bintner P.E., Engineering Services Manager Item Activity: Subject:Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project: 30% Design Check In Discussion CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None; discussion only. INTRODUCTION: Staff will report on project 30% design and public engagement for Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project strategy, design goals, considerations and opportunities approved at the April 20, 2021. Attached is a staff report that follows the same form as section 5 of the staff report presented at the April 20, 2021 Council meeting, updated for the 30% design phase. The staff report, public engagement report, revised CIP and technical memo from the April 20, 2021 meeting are also attached for reference. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report April 20, 2021 Staff Report Public Participation Plan Technical Memo Revised CIP Staff Presentation September 21, 2021 Mayor and City Council Ross Bintner, P.E., Engineering Services Manager Jessica Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project: 30% Design Check In Information / Background: This recommendation was approved at the City Council work meeting April 20, 2021. The purpose of this report is to check in at the 30% design phase of the Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project on meeting commitments of the approved project goals, requirements, and resources for project design and closing the loop on formal public input on park features. 30% Recommendations The preliminary recommendation approved at the April 20, 2021 meeting is modified and augmented as shown below with strikethrough and underlining. The design creates infrastructure consistent with the “Bigger” option, with the following features included in design (see Table 1 and Figure 2 of the tech memo); 1. An expanded and lowered Weber Pond, (tech memo Feature 1) including: a. Expansion into Weber Woods and the removal of approximately 6 acres of trees b. Natural resource restoration and improvement of the entire Weber Woods land area c. Creation of nature trails and a one or more bridges or floating boardwalks connecting east to west across the pond 2. An expanded and lower Lynn/Kipling inundation area (tech memo feature 4) including: a. Tree removal along most of the basin, with several tree stands saved b. A mixed wetland and pond, with aquatic and upland natural resource restoration 3. An expanded pipe and swale to provide overflow from the Lynn/Kipling inundation area and the Grimes Avenue low point (tech memo features 2 and 3) including: a. A box culvert along the 41st right-of-way and easement corridor between homes i. A box culvert along the 41st right-of-way will be used only if a 42nd Street Pipe cannot be feasibly upsized to accommodate additional flood flow. b. A landscaped swale along the north side of the active play spaces in Weber Park in an alignment and scale that minimizes impacts to provide high flow and clean water benefits, including an east to west park trail. STAFF REPORT Page 2 4. An expanded and reconfigured pipe network extending west on 42nd, south on Crocker, east on Morningside Road, south on Grimes, and west on Branson minor grade changes on Grimes and Crocker (Technical Memo features 9, 9a, and 10) and minor grade changes on 40th (part of Technical Memo feature 8) including: a. Expanded surface inlets to fully utilize pipe capacity in extreme events b. Minor changes to grades in streets and curb lines to reduce potential surface flows or flood backflow into low or landlocked areas. The 30% design uses the strategies, design goals, considerations and opportunities consistent with the Council approval at the April 20, 2021 with comments underlined. 1. Affirm strategy, design goals, considerations and opportunities (also described in section 2 above). a. Strategy; Risk transfer with pipe, and mitigation and additional flood reduction with storage b. Design goals; i. No increase in risk to any individual property (goal met) ii. Balance the risk and benefit of the project (goal met) iii. No private property will be proposed for acquisition and no floodwalls are needed as no flood stages are higher in the proposed design (goal met) c. Include as design consideration; i. Consider future climate change in design (used in design to size emergency flow paths and informs balance between storage and risk-transfer with larger pipes) ii. Limit impact at Weber Park by focusing pond expansion in Weber Woods, using a pumped outlet to lower the outlet water elevation, and using smart infrastructure approach of predictive pumping ahead of extreme events. (used in design to size emergency flow paths, informs balance) d. Take advantage of opportunity; i. Enhance natural areas where impacts occur (goal met) ii. Consider park improvements where impacts occur (goal met) iii. Remove or reduce potential for flood overflow into private property through minor changes in grade (goal met) iv. Add inlets in low areas to fully utilize pipe (goal met) e. Tradeoffs i. Project will use park space in Weber Park, Weber Woods, and Lynn/Kipling inundation area (List of features from “Bigger” option described in section 5 to bring forward.) (Tradeoff made, optimized to reduce impacts) 2. Public participation has been conducted inform the public and project about park landscape aesthetics choices, consistent with the public participation plan approved by Council at the April 20, 2021 meeting and the Council “Better Together” public participation strategy. Budget and Schedule / Next Steps The revised CIP approved included $1.4M of professional services in 2021, $9.5M of capital improvement in and 0.5M professional services in 2022, and $0.1M of professional services and $0.5M of capital improvement in 2023. Preliminary design work is has found minor grant funding available for flood work STAFF REPORT Page 3 that could reduce capital costs, and contaminated dredge materials that require landfill that could increase capital costs. The design team is working to value engineer to reduce costs. The design team is recommending the project be delivered in three contracts. The first contract will be a tree clearing done in Winter 2021/22. The propose of this early contract is to meet goals and regulatory requirements to protect species that use trees in Spring and Summer. The park and earthwork to create flood storage will take place in a grading and utilities contract. The upstream pipe capacity work will take place as part of the 2022 Neighborhood street recon project. Expected schedule Q3 2021 (late) Public comment period ends, 30-60% design work, regulatory permits Q4 2021; Regulatory permits, final design work Q1 2022 Award tree clearing contract Q2 2022 (early) Award grading/park project Q2 2022 (early) Award neighborhood recon project (includes majority of pipe project) Q2 2022 (mid) Construction Starts Attachments (repeated from 4/20/21 approval) Technical Memo Public participation plan Revised CIP Past reports to Council April 20, 2021 Council Meeting - Staff Recommendation March 16, 2021 Council Work Session – Preliminary Staff Recommendation September 1, 2020 Council Work Session – Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project Update April 21, 2020 Approve Public Participation Plan for Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project and Request for Purchase for Engineering and Engagement Services Public Participation Plan April 7, 2020 Flood Risk Reduction Strategy approval March 5, 2019 FRRS Strategy Update September 5, 2018 – Adoption of 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan April 3, 2018 – Work Session – Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan – Implementation Discussion January 17, 2018 – Authorize Staff to Submit Draft Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan for Agency Review November 21, 2017 – Work Session – Draft 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Presentation for Review and Comment Water Resources Library – Historical Morningside Neighborhood Stormwater Reports May 17, 2016 – Weber Woods Purchase Agreement April 20, 2021 Mayor and City Council Ross Bintner, P.E., Engineering Services Manager Jessica Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project – Staff Recommendation Information / Background: This recommendation was provided in draft at the City Council work session March 16. Sections 1-4 remain unchanged, and Section 5 has been updated to reflect next steps consistent with Council input. The purpose of this report is to end the concept design phase of the Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project and move forward by setting project goals, requirements, and resources for project design and construction, approving a scope of service for design, and approving a plan for public input of park features. The proposed council action is spelled out in section 5. The report includes the following sections and topics: • In Section 1, the report provides background and context from the 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan (CWRMP) update, the Flood Risk Reduction Strategy, the timeline for creation of new infrastructure in the Morningside neighborhood, and previews the challenge of flooding and meeting the challenges of flooding. • In Section 2, the report provides information about how we engaged the public and used public input to inform the concept design and a framework for the concept design and engineering process that tested scenarios and developed and refined options. • In Section 3, the report provides detail on the scenarios, lessons learned, and how they informed the design. • In Section 4, the report details the options at three levels of effort and decision criteria that were used to explore the scale and relative value of the varying features of the options. • In Section 5, the report provides context on the development of a preferred option, a staff recommendation and next steps. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Section 1: Background and Context Flooding in Edina is not only common, but also increasing. The City of Edina uses its Flood Risk Reduction Strategy to understand and address this issue. Flood risk is defined by climate, exposure, and vulnerability. These factors vary with time, and across the landscape, assets, and people that characterize the community. Weather patterns and climate trends. Rainfall varies over time, landscapes, and elevation. Soils and the natural shape of the land also define runoff. The degree to which property, homes, buildings, infrastructure and other assets come into contact with flood water. The degree to which exposed assets, both public and private, are unable to resist flooding and are damaged by floods. The metric we use to measure flood risk is the exposure and vulnerability to principal, habitable structures. Structural flood risk can occur through over land flooding, groundwater seepage, and sanitary backflow. Over the land surface Groundwater seepage Sanitary backflow The primary and secondary drivers are climate change and aging infrastructure. Well-drained landscapes and imperviousness also matter but are more historical drivers of flood risk. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Climate change is making storms more intense and increasing the chance of extended wet periods or drought. Climate change has already and will expose more assets to flooding in the future. This driver is predicted to overwhelm the other drivers in terms of scale. Private and public assets and infrastructure are both exposed and vulnerable. Public infrastructure can define flood exposure for different points in the landscape and serve as a pathway for private risk. Public infrastructure assets are old and not capable of meeting the current demand. This is a significant driver as infrastructure provides most stormwater service. Development has connected the landscape to the water to make land well- drained. While this a major historic driver, it is a minor driver increasing future flood exposure. Most of the drainage and land development decisions have already been made and cannot be unmade. There is additional demand for drainage that can reduce vulnerability, but marginally affects flood exposure downstream. Community demand for garages, parking areas, patios, decks, pools, and bigger homes has increased the hard cover of soils. Imperviousness drives runoff in small storms and marginally affects flood exposure in large storms. We defined the sectors of municipal work within which we work to connect on the promise to comprehensively reduce the risk of flooding throughout the community; infrastructure, regulation, outreach and engagement, and emergency services. This planning project was conducted to be consistent with the City Council’s Better Together public engagement goals to plan infrastructure consistent with the Strong Foundation (maintain physical assets and infrastructure) goals. The project focused on the infrastructure and engagement areas of work. INFRASTRUCTURE: We will renew our infrastructure and operate it to reduce risk. We will plan public streets and parks to accept and transmit flood waters to reduce the risk and disruption of related city services. REGULATION: We acknowledge competing demands of land use and addressing drainage, groundwater, and surface water issues. We help people solve issues without harming another. STAFF REPORT Page 4 OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT: We make flood information available and give people tools for flood resilience. EMERGENCY SERVICES: We help people prepare for floods, remove people from harm during floods, and recover after floods. While developing the Flood Risk Reduction Strategy, we used the Morningside Neighborhood as a focus area to test concepts on what works to reduce flood exposure for homes. Two concepts that challenged the infrastructure area of work in that Strategy development effort also challenged this infrastructure design effort – scale and balance. Scale and Balance; Infrastructure sized to provide benefit to all, and harm no one, while balancing flood risk reduction benefits, takes neighborhood scale with additional flood storage, and careful sizing and planning of pipes, flow paths and intervening flood storage. Anticipated roadway reconstruction in the Morningside neighborhood in 2022 and 2023 presents an opportunity to explore infrastructure-based solutions to managing flood risk. This is the first project to engage a neighborhood and plan flood infrastructure under the new strategy. Staff initiated the engagement and engineering design in early 2020 to prepare for the street reconstruction design, set to kick-off in May 2021. City of Edina budget goals Strong Foundation: Maintain physical assets and infrastructure. Livable City: Plan for connected and sustainable development. Reliable Service: Maintain service levels that best meet the needs of the community. Better Together: Foster an inclusive and engaged community. STAFF REPORT Page 5 Section 2: Flood Infrastructure Concept Design Process The design team was made up of City of Edina staff and scientists and engineers from Barr Engineering Company. The design team engaged with a variety of individuals and groups to inform the design. Here is who was involved. Public Policy Technical Individuals in the Morningside neighborhood Energy and Environment Commission Expert engineering panel Morningside Neighborhood Association steering committee Planning Commission Neighboring cities staff Avail Academy and Susan Lindgren School Parks and Recreation Commission Minnehaha Creek Watershed District The design process involved the following steps to iteratively gather input and develop flood infrastructure scenarios leading to conceptual designs: 1. Preliminary public engagement 2. Scenario development 3. Scenario public engagement 4. Scenario technical expert panel 5. Option development 6. Option public engagement 7. Option expert panel 8. Staff recommendation of refined option We are grateful to many individuals that followed, posted, emailed, called, attended and otherwise reached out during this project. Here is a summary of what we heard, and how it affected the design: • Concerns for individual residential structures • Concerns for balancing and sharing of benefits throughout neighborhood • Concerns for future flood risk with climate change • Concerns about property acquisition or use of public property for flood storage • Concerns about public spaces and natural resources • Concerns about floodwall scenarios • Concerns about some options not serving part of the neighborhood Additional details, including specific events and comments in the public engagement process are available in the appendix (Public Participation Summary, January 22, 2021). Additional detail about the flood infrastructure scenarios and concepts are provided in the following sections. Here is how public input affected our design; • Include as design goals; o No increase in risk to any individual property o Balance the risk and benefit of the project o No private property will be proposed for acquisition STAFF REPORT Page 6 o Avoid floodwalls • Include as design consideration; o Future climate change o Limit impact at Weber Park • Take advantage of opportunity; o Enhance natural areas where impacts occur o Consider park improvements where impacts occur o Remove or reduce potential for flood overflow into private property through minor changes in grade o Add inlets in low areas to fully utilize pipe • Detailed conversations also led the design team to; o Consider backflow and overflow on Grimes Avenue o Improve system map and model accuracy in 41st street right-of-way o Consider overflow on Crocker Avenue In addition to these direct effects on our design, City staff engaged directly with many residents on individual concerns and responded with phone conversations, conducted site visits, shared flood vulnerability reduction technical advice, interpreted and questioned model results, expanded on and shared ideas for flood risk and reduction techniques, attended on-site public open houses, and held online virtual meetings with discussions. Section 3: Flood Infrastructure Scenarios The design team created and reviewed the following scenarios to test key infrastructure strategies at reducing flood risk. • Pipes / Floodwalls • Flood storage • Graded overflows • Ponds and predictive pumping • Combination Each of the scenarios resulted in increased flood risk for some properties in the neighborhood. Some scenarios and specific infrastructure features lead to unacceptable results or risks that drew concern from the public including those that contemplated using private property or tried to store flood water above home elevations with floodwalls. Key lessons learned: 1. Additional storage is key for providing benefit for middle and low elevation areas, above ground storage in existing and expanded ponds and low areas is most valuable and cost effective. 2. Subwatershed scale is large and providing benefit across the subwatershed takes significant pipe upgrade. Pipes transfer risk downstream that must be mitigated with additional flood storage. 3. Balancing the flood risk benefits and making sure no additional risk was produced for some properties took careful planning and iterative testing using stormwater modeling. STAFF REPORT Page 7 4. Lowering storage areas with new lower pipe outlets, or pumped outlets was the only way to create the amount of new storage needed to reduce flood elevations and get to subwatershed scale while keeping park land tradeoffs reasonable. In the end, while no single scenario met the mark for the designers nor the community, we kept the elements that did provide value and explored what various levels of implementation would look like. Additional details on lessons learned from the scenario development can be found in the February 3 Technical Memo, Infrastructure Options to Reduce Flood Risk in the Morningside Neighborhood located in the appendix. Section 4: Options and Decision Criteria The design team created and reviewed the three various size options “Big”, “Bigger” and “Biggest”, by iteratively adding or removing individual features of the design. Due to the interconnected relationship of storage to pipes, and the all-in cost of some of infrastructure features, some features were upsized or downsized in one or more of the options. The options were then reviewed with decision criteria described in this section, to find which were providing good value, and which were not. The process to create these three options built off the lessons learned from the scenarios described in Section 3. The design team explored the following criteria to refine the options and inform the staff recommendation. Criteria / Name No-build Big Bigger Biggest Approximate Infrastructure Cost $0M(2) $5M $10M $15M Neighborhood-scale? Not applicable No Yes Yes Balances upstream and downstream risk? Not applicable Yes Yes Yes Homes removed from risk (1%- annual-chance event)(1) 0 5 28 37 Home with risk reduced (1%- annual-chance event) (1) 0 91 119 119 Benefit (Annualized damage avoided) (1) $0 $102,200 $172,500 $180,800 % Reduction damages (1%- annual-chance flooding) (1) 0 -10% -46% -53% Neighborhood wide reduction in damage (damage avoided in 1% annual-chance flooding) (1) 0 $291,000 $1,386,000 $1,612,000 % Reduction damages (10%- annual-chance flooding) (1) 0 -28% -47% -48% Neighborhood wide reduction in damage (damage avoided in 10% annual-chance flooding) (1) 0 $439,000 $750,000 $759,000 STAFF REPORT Page 8 Damage Reduction / Cost Ratio Not applicable 1.1 0.9 0.7 Parks, land, natural resource, tradeoffs and opportunities No Yes Yes Yes Note 1; 1% annual chance event, sometimes called the 100-year event, or 10% annual chance event, sometimes called the 10-year event. More detail on smaller and larger event metrics can be found in the technical memo, in the appendix. Note 2; While the no-build option is listed in this chart as $0, we note that the renewal of the existing infrastructure scheduled for 2022 and 2023 as part of planned street reconstruction will exceed $2M. While some savings accrue by upgrading parts of the infrastructure rather than maintaining, additional costs for maintaining existing infrastructure are planned as part of the neighborhood reconstruction program. While the three refined options are not fully optimized for stormwater flood risk reduction, the design team feels they represent a good range of the scale and value that can be achieved, for the costs and tradeoffs proposed. The design team concludes that several of the features only found in the “Biggest” option, are not providing good value or are redundant with features that perform better. Section 3 of the technical memo has detailed descriptions of all the features. The technical memo also includes figures that show existing and proposed flood inundation mapping for all options for a variety of storm sizes. The 1%-annual-chance event for the existing and “Bigger” options are shown as examples. STAFF REPORT Page 9 Existing 1%-Annual-Chance Event Inundation (7.5 inches in 24 hours) 1%-Annual-Chance Event, $10M-“Bigger” Option Inundation The design team sees the potential for significant flood reduction in even large events, at the “Bigger” option, $10M cost. While flooding on private properties and risk to homes is not eliminated, it is significantly reduced. Some areas, particularly landlocked areas have more modest benefits as the design proposes to eliminate or reduce the potential to overflow into those areas. Section 5: Preliminary Recommendation and Next Steps The staff and design team recommend creating infrastructure consistent with the “Bigger” option, with the following features to include in design (see Table 1 and Figure 2 of the tech memo); 1. An expanded and lowered Weber Pond, (tech memo Feature 1) including: a. Expansion into Weber Woods and the removal of approximately 6 acres of trees b. Natural resource restoration and improvement of the entire Weber Woods land area c. Creation of nature trails and a bridge or floating boardwalk connecting east to west across the pond 2. An expanded and lower Lynn/Kipling inundation area (tech memo feature 4) including: a. Tree removal along most of the basin, with several tree stands saved b. A mixed wetland and pond, with aquatic and upland natural resource restoration STAFF REPORT Page 10 3. An expanded pipe and swale to provide overflow from the Lynn/Kipling inundation area (tech memo features 2 and 3) including: a. A box culvert along the 41st right-of-way and easement corridor between homes b. A landscaped swale along the north side of the active play spaces in Weber Park to provide high flow and clean water benefits, including an east to west park trail. 4. An expanded and reconfigured pipe network extending west on 42nd, south on Crocker, east on Morningside Road, south on Grimes, and west on Branson minor grade changes on Grimes and Crocker (Technical Memo features 9, 9a, and 10) and minor grade changes on 40th (part of Technical Memo feature 8) including: a. Expanded surface inlets to fully utilize pipe capacity in extreme events b. Minor changes to grades in streets and curb lines to reduce potential surface flows or flood backflow into low or landlocked areas. Staff proposes the following actions for Council consideration: 1. Affirm strategy, design goals, considerations and opportunities (also described in section 2 above). a. Strategy; Risk transfer with pipe, and mitigation and additional flood reduction with storage b. Design goals; i. No increase in risk to any individual property ii. Balance the risk and benefit of the project iii. No private property will be proposed for acquisition and no floodwalls are needed as no flood stages are higher in the proposed design c. Include as design consideration; i. Consider future climate change in design ii. Limit impact at Weber Park by focusing pond expansion in Weber Woods, using a pumped outlet to lower the outlet water elevation, and using smart infrastructure approach of predictive pumping ahead of extreme events. d. Take advantage of opportunity; i. Enhance natural areas where impacts occur ii. Consider park improvements where impacts occur iii. Remove or reduce potential for flood overflow into private property through minor changes in grade iv. Add inlets in low areas to fully utilize pipe e. Tradeoffs i. Project will use park space in Weber Park, Weber Woods, and Lynn/Kipling inundation area (List of features from “Bigger” option described in section 5 to bring forward.) 2. Modify Capital Improvement Plan item 19-341 (attached) to include estimated design professional services costs in 2021 of $1.4M, construction professional services in 2022 of $0.5M, capital expenses of $9.5M in 2022, and $0.5M in 2023, totaling $10M in capital and $2M in professional services, in addition to the $0.25M previously allocated to engagement and concept design work. 3. Authorize City Manager to sign professional service scope of service with Barr Engineering for Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project for a cost not to exceed $1.204M STAFF REPORT Page 11 4. Approve public participation plan to inform the public and project about park landscape aesthetics choices. Attachments Technical Memo Engagement Report Past reports to Council March 16, 2021 Council Work Session – Preliminary Staff Recommendation September 1, 2020 Council Work Session – Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project Update April 21, 2020 Approve Public Participation Plan for Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project and Request for Purchase for Engineering and Engagement Services Public Participation Plan April 7, 2020 Flood Risk Reduction Strategy approval March 5, 2019 FRRS Strategy Update September 5, 2018 – Adoption of 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan April 3, 2018 – Work Session – Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan – Implementation Discussion January 17, 2018 – Authorize Staff to Submit Draft Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan for Agency Review November 21, 2017 – Work Session – Draft 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Presentation for Review and Comment Water Resources Library – Historical Morningside Neighborhood Stormwater Reports May 17, 2016 – Weber Woods Purchase Agreement PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN I MORNINGSIDE FLOOD INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT I CITY OF EDINA 1 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN MORNINGSIDE FLOOD INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT DECISION TO BE MADE - Develop Weber Park landscape design consistent with flood infrastructure elements and budget approved by City Council with the Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project decision. (www.BetterTogetherEdina.org/Morningside). - Staff will update City Council at the 30% design milestone. - Staff will make a request for purchase for construction, City Council will decide. DECISION CRITERIA IN SCOPE - Natural areas restoration - Walking paths - Ball fields and rink placement - Irrigation - Tree removal and planting - Pond and park grading - Lynn/Kipling open space grading and natural areas restoration OUT OF SCOPE - Roadway reconstruction elements such as street width, and sanitary sewer and water improvements DECISIONS ALREADY MADE - Consistent with the purchase agreement, Weber Woods shall be used solely for public park purposes, including open space, outdoor recreation, and dog park, and similar uses and facilities; stormwater management facilities; and public utilities. - Roadway reconstruction schedule - Renewal of sanitary sewer, water, and storm sewer utilities included in roadway reconstruction project - A dedicated bicycle facility along the east side of Grimes Avenue will be installed during construction - Concept-level flood infrastructure elements and budget approved by City Council - At least two ball fields will be included in the design - The number of skate facilities (1 rink and 1 open skate) will remain the same - Rink lighting will be replaced - No changes to the warming house - No changes to the tennis courts - No changes to the playground - No changes to the basketball court OTHER CONSIDERATIONS - Neighboring Cities - Roadway reconstruction is guided by the Living Streets Plan - Walking and biking facilities are guided by the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan - Safety improvements are guided by the City’s Traffic Safety Committee and existing City policies LEGAL OR TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN I MORNINGSIDE FLOOD INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT I CITY OF EDINA 2 - FEMA floodplain designation - Minnehaha Creek Watershed District rules - Minnesota Department of Natural Resources rules PROJECT TIMELINE - Spring 2021 through early 2022 for engagement and design. - The Engineering Study for the road reconstruction would occur concurrently. Construction would start in the spring of 2022. STAKEHOLDERS - Morningside Neighborhood - Morningside Neighborhood Association - Park and Recreation Commission - Avail Academy (formerly Calvin Christian School) - Minnehaha Creek Watershed District - City of St Louis Park - City of Minneapolis ROLES RESIDENTS Expertise in sense of place, neighborhood feel, public attitudes, community values, desired amenities, tax burden. - Provides their expertise on values - Reviews concept - Communicates questions and concerns STAFF Expertise in engineering, water and natural resources management, flood risk, transportation planning and safety, street and utility construction, parks and recreation, and landscape architecture. - Develops design based on technical expertise and professional judgement - Communicates the costs, tradeoffs, constraints, and impacts (economic, social, environmental) - Considers feedback from stakeholders - Seeks direction from Council on political decisions and operates within parameters set by Council - Describes how the public influenced the concept design - Memorializes engagement process and decision - Closes the loop with the public - Implements the decision made by Council CITY COUNCIL Decision-making body. - Shares the feedback received directly from stakeholders with the project team in a timely manner so that all have the same information - Decides funding level and source - Defines level of service - Sets parameters for improvements in public spaces such as streets, right-of-way, and parks PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN I MORNINGSIDE FLOOD INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT I CITY OF EDINA 3 - Approves design PUBLIC PARTICIPATON LEVEL CONSULT - Goal: To obtain public feedback on analysis, alternatives and/or decisions. - Promise: We will keep the public informed, listen to and acknowledge concerns and aspirations, and provide feedback on how public input influenced the decision. TECHNIQUES - Better Together Edina website - Social media (Next Door, Facebook, Twitter) - Community Meetings DECISION PROCESS Objective Staff will inform people of the project and process. This is an extension of the Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project. Staff will present the 30% concept design and solicit feedback. Staff will consider feedback. Staff will provide an update to City Council. Staff will make a request for purchase for construction following a competitive bid process. City Council will make a decision. Staff will communicate the final design to the public. Staff will archive the project and process online. Anticipated Outcomes People know how and when to provide feedback. People have access to information. People have the ability to provide their feedback. Staff have listened to and acknowledged resident feedback. People know how feedback was used. Staff have listened to and acknowledged resident feedback. People know how feedback was used. The staff recommendation aligns with City Council direction. People know what decision was made. People can view the information and process on the BetterTogetherEdina webpage. Timeline Spring 2021 Summer 2021 Summer or Fall 2021 Spring 2022 Spring 2022 Close the loopProject AuthorizationCouncil Update Share Concept Design Introduce Project Barr Engineering Co. 4300 MarketPointe Drive, Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55435 952.832.2600 www.barr.com Memorandum To: Jessica Wilson and Ross Bintner, City of Edina From: Cory Anderson, Greg Williams, and Sarah Stratton Subject: Infrastructure Options to Reduce Flood Risk in the Morningside Neighborhood Date: February 3, 2020 Project: 23271798.00 1.0 Purpose of Project and Project Background This technical memorandum summarizes Barr Engineering Co.’s (Barr’s) evaluation of the refined potential options for flood risk reduction in the Morningside neighborhood within the City of Edina (Figure 1). This evaluation expanded on previous efforts briefly summarized in Section 2.0. The flood risk reduction features of the refined options are described in Section 3.0. The benefits and the associated costs of each of the refined options are discussed in Section 4.0, and Section 5.0 describes some tradeoffs and opportunities that may exist for further refinement ahead of final detailed design and construction. Finally, conclusions of this work and the previous efforts and a summary of recommended next steps are included in Section 6.0. The goal of this memo is to provide City staff and City Council with the information needed to make decisions in 2021 aimed at implementing the most economical, advantageous, and optimized flood risk reduction project in the Morningside neighborhood in coordination with the planned street reconstruction in 2022 and 2023. The City has also performed extensive community engagement to address flood risk reduction options in the Morningside neighborhood. These efforts are described in a separate report. Figure 1 Morningside Neighborhood study area (storm sewer shown in black lines) To: Jessica Wilson and Ross Bintner, City of Edina From: Cory Anderson, Greg Williams, and Sarah Stratton Subject: Infrastructure Options to Reduce Flood Risk in the Morningside Neighborhood Date: February 3, 2020 Page: 2 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Mitigation Alternatives Technical Memo\Jan2021 Memo\Morningside_Flood_Infrastructure_Technical_Memo_02032021.docx 2.0 Summary of Previous Work The City of Edina’s Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan (CWRMP), published in July 2018 (reference (1)) identified the Morningside neighborhood as an area with a significant number of structures at risk of flooding. This neighborhood is also planned for street reconstruction in 2022 and 2023 (reference (2)). Given both the need to reduce flood risk and the street reconstruction opportunity, the City began planning for a flood risk reduction project. At the time the CWRMP was published, an uncalibrated stormwater model of the City was used to determine the main factors affecting flood risk. These factors were identified as limited outlet capacity from the Morningside neighborhood to Minneapolis and limited flood storage capacity within the neighborhood. A preliminary analysis was completed to understand options available to reduce peak water levels during storm events and to assess the impact of each potential flood risk reduction option. Ultimately, the suggestions documented in the CWRMP included increased flood storage in Weber Park, increased outlet capacity to Bde Maka Ska (in coordination with Minneapolis), and increased pipe capacity and additional or new stormwater outlets within the neighborhood. In November 2018, the uncalibrated stormwater model was used to conduct a more detailed assessment of the options for reducing the flood risk identified in the CRWMP (reference (3)). In this evaluation, flood risk reduction scenarios (i.e., surface storage, conveyance, underground storage, pumping, etc.) were initially analyzed, one at a time, to understand the impacts of each type of approach and identify the locations in the neighborhood that would receive the most flood risk reduction benefit. Individual components of each flood risk reduction scenario were then grouped into multiple “combination options” to further increase flood risk reduction benefits. Additionally, a method was developed to (1) estimate potential flood damage (in dollars) to individual homes and to the neighborhood as a whole, and (2) estimate the value of each flood risk reduction option (in dollars of potential damage avoided). The study included planning-level opinions Timeline of Previous Related Work 2018 • City of Edina Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan developed • Uncalibrated Morningside neighborhood stormwater model used to assess feasibility of preliminary options for reducing flood risk 2019 • Morningside surface water levels monitored and used to calibrate existing stormwater model in cooperation with St. Louis Park and Minneapolis • City engages a citizen task force to help inform a flood risk reduction strategy 2020 • City publishes a Flood Risk Reduction Strategy • Updated stormwater model used to evaluate design storm events; resulting flood risk documented • Local engineering experts in urban/residential flooding and mitigation meet to further evaluate existing flood risk reduction concepts and discuss new and modified approaches • Calibrated and detailed stormwater model used to model the best subset of flood risk reduction scenarios • “Refined options” are created that maximize the flood risk reduction benefit to the neighborhood while considering a range of estimated costs To: Jessica Wilson and Ross Bintner, City of Edina From: Cory Anderson, Greg Williams, and Sarah Stratton Subject: Infrastructure Options to Reduce Flood Risk in the Morningside Neighborhood Date: February 3, 2020 Page: 3 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Mitigation Alternatives Technical Memo\Jan2021 Memo\Morningside_Flood_Infrastructure_Technical_Memo_02032021.docx of construction costs for comparison to the estimated value of each flood risk reduction option (i.e., benefit-cost analysis). This analysis showed: 1) Additional flood storage volume is necessary in this neighborhood. 2) Increased pipe capacity benefits the upstream (south and west) portions of the neighborhood and is only possible if increased flood storage volume is also included. 3) Pumping is one way to create additional flood storage volume. 4) Adding a predictive component to the pumping increases the cost by a relatively small amount (approximately 1% of the overall cost estimate, or about 10% of the pump station alone). 5) Although it can provide significant storage, underground storage is not economical. It was during this study that the option for a larger outlet pipe to Minneapolis was removed from consideration because it would exacerbate existing flooding concerns within Minneapolis. Evaluations up to this point were completed using an uncalibrated stormwater model. In 2019 the hydrology and hydraulics of the neighborhood were studied in more detail by monitoring surface water levels and then using the data to calibrate the stormwater model to multiple storm events. The model was also combined with the stormwater models of the adjacent cities of St. Louis Park and Minneapolis to further reduce uncertainties associated with model boundary conditions. Finally, additional overland flow detail (two-dimensional modeling of water on the ground surface) was added to the model to improve the understanding of surface flow during large storm events. The updated model was used to model design storm events (from the 20%-annual-chance event through the 0.2%-annual-chance event), and the resulting flood risk was documented in April 2020 (reference (4)). In 2020, City staff convened two meetings of local engineering experts in urban/residential flooding and mitigation to further evaluate existing flood risk reduction concepts and discuss new or modified approaches. For this meeting, a modified version of an Estimate-Talk-Estimate (ETE) approach was used— a problem was presented, and multiple rounds of thoughts and opinions shared until consensus was reached. These meetings helped confirm that there are three primary approaches to reducing flood risk in this area (reference (5)): 1) Increase conveyance to move water away from people and structures 2) Increase storage to hold water away from people and structures 3) Move people and structures away from water to reduce exposure and/or reduce structure vulnerability To: Jessica Wilson and Ross Bintner, City of Edina From: Cory Anderson, Greg Williams, and Sarah Stratton Subject: Infrastructure Options to Reduce Flood Risk in the Morningside Neighborhood Date: February 3, 2020 Page: 4 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Mitigation Alternatives Technical Memo\Jan2021 Memo\Morningside_Flood_Infrastructure_Technical_Memo_02032021.docx The three primary approaches confirmed during these meetings were consistent with the previous work described above; however, there was no detailed discussion about where to use these general approaches within the Morningside neighborhood. Also in 2020, the calibrated two-dimensional stormwater model was used to model the best subset of the flood risk reduction scenarios created in 2018. This was an effort to update our understanding of the benefit of these scenarios (compared to the existing flood risk) using the best available model (reference (5)). The main conclusions from the 2018 analysis were confirmed and the modeling highlighted the increased benefit of combining features best suited for different portions of the neighborhood. At the end of 2020, “refined options” were created that maximize the flood risk reduction benefit to the neighborhood while considering a range of estimated costs (Section 3.0). Throughout this process, every effort was made to avoid relying on acquisition of homes to reduce exposure to flood risk. In 2020, the City also developed a Flood Risk Reduction Strategy (reference (6)) that included a summary of actions that homeowners can take to reduce their vulnerability to flooding. This information, along with other information related to flooding and drainage, is available on the City’s website (reference (7)). 3.0 Description of the Refined Options Refining flood risk reduction options requires a “balancing act.” For example, while using larger pipes to increase conveyance may reduce flood risk in the upstream portion of the watershed, it can also push the problem downstream. To mitigate the effect of increased upstream conveyance, increased storage downstream is required. In short, we need to take care that flood risk reduction measures do not simply transfer risk from one area of the watershed to the other. In addition to achieving balance, an additional goal for refined flood risk reduction options was that flood risk should not increase for any structure. The effort to refine flood risk reduction options was informed by the previous work described in Section 2.0 and summarized below: • Additional flow capacity out of the neighborhood to Minneapolis should be removed from consideration. While adding flow capacity using larger pipe will effectively decrease risk in upstream areas, it also transfers that risk to downstream areas—where conveyance capacity does not exist. There are existing and significant flooding issues present in Minneapolis between the Morningside neighborhood and Bde Maka Ska, and on the lake itself. • Additional flood storage in the Morningside neighborhood is necessary. Additional flood storage not only serves those who live closest to it by reducing local water levels, but also makes it possible to increase conveyance from upstream areas to the areas with additional storage. Without additional flood storage, additional conveyance merely transfers risk from upstream to To: Jessica Wilson and Ross Bintner, City of Edina From: Cory Anderson, Greg Williams, and Sarah Stratton Subject: Infrastructure Options to Reduce Flood Risk in the Morningside Neighborhood Date: February 3, 2020 Page: 5 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Mitigation Alternatives Technical Memo\Jan2021 Memo\Morningside_Flood_Infrastructure_Technical_Memo_02032021.docx downstream. Increasing flood risk to individual downstream structures is not an acceptable outcome. • The additional flood storage needed should be placed in open areas located at the surface (i.e., not underground), near the mid- and downstream portions of the neighborhood. The result is a few large, concentrated pond features in the neighborhood. The upstream portions of the neighborhood are fully developed with no room for large surface storage, and underground storage is not a cost-effective solution here. • A moderately sized pump station can be added to the neighborhood and can provide substantial available storage in advance of large storms by pumping down the ponds in a controlled manner (i.e., predictive pumping). Using pumping to pre-emptively increase available storage can allow greater effective storage within a smaller footprint. Predictive ability (monitoring weather forecasts and water levels in real-time) can be added for little additional cost and automates the operation of this feature. • Increased conveyance capacity via storm sewer pipes is necessary to reduce upstream flooding and limit surcharging and overland flow in the mid-to-downstream areas. The main storm sewer lines through the neighborhood flow above full capacity during large storms, which results in water spilling out of the storm sewer into the streets and onto the surface (surcharging). Increased conveyance can transfer risk from upstream to downstream if there is insufficient storage capacity downstream; thus, increased conveyance must be balanced with increased storage volume. • Flood risk in backyard areas that lack or do not have sufficient storm sewer outlets can be reduced by adding catch basins or similar structures. However, this can only be done if the capacity of the connected storm sewer lines is increased to accommodate the additional water. Ultimately, this can only be done if additional flood storage volume is provided downstream. • Individual home and property owners can and should take preventative measures to further reduce flood risk to themselves. One of the approaches for reducing flood risk is to limit exposure and/or vulnerability. As homes are rebuilt in the City, policies regarding minimum building elevations may reduce exposure and therefore flood risk. Additionally, features such as backflow preventers, tile drain around homes, and backup generators reduce vulnerability and risk (reference (8)). The City’s Flood Risk Reduction Strategy included a tool kit that provide residents with a range of ideas (including low-cost and no-cost options) to reduce the vulnerability of their homes, such as storing valuable items off the basement floor, redirecting downspouts and taking temporary mitigation measures when rains are anticipated. A refined combination option was created based on the bullet points above. The initial concept was intended to achieve as much flood risk reduction as possible, while avoiding options previously ruled out (e.g., increasing flow to Minneapolis, acquisition, avoiding unrealistically sized infrastructure). The To: Jessica Wilson and Ross Bintner, City of Edina From: Cory Anderson, Greg Williams, and Sarah Stratton Subject: Infrastructure Options to Reduce Flood Risk in the Morningside Neighborhood Date: February 3, 2020 Page: 6 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Mitigation Alternatives Technical Memo\Jan2021 Memo\Morningside_Flood_Infrastructure_Technical_Memo_02032021.docx probable cost was estimated for construction and design (~$15M, “Biggest” option) and identified to be higher than the anticipated funding available. Therefore, the refined combination option was modified by removing features that were less beneficial (compared to their individual cost) until the costs were lowered to levels closer to the available-funding estimate provided by City staff (~$5M, “Big” option) and about double that value (~$10M, “Bigger” option). The following numbered list describes each of the individual flood risk reduction features in the refined options. Figure 2 shows the locations of those features identified using the numbers from the list below. Table 1 identifies which features are included at the three different estimated cost levels. Additional information is available in the published documents on the City’s Better Together website, particularly documents related to the December 2020 virtual public meeting (reference (9)). 1) The first feature is an expanded Weber Pond, creating some of the necessary additional flood storage in the downstream-most portion of the neighborhood. The proposed pond is larger in extent, expanding into Weber Woods and slightly west into Weber Park. The pond bottom is lowered, and the outlet elevation of the pond is also lowered by creating a lower gravity outlet, or a pumped outlet, which creates more vertical flood storage capacity before water levels reach homes or other infrastructure. This feature also includes a pump station with predictive pumping capabilities to draw the level of the pond down by as much as 3 feet in advance of large storm events. The pump will not pump the pond fully dry, leaving at least 1 foot of water prior to very large storm events. Predictive pumping introduces an element of operational uncertainty; the potential impacts of predictive pumping scenarios were evaluated and summarized in Table 2 of (reference (5)). The expanded pond requires the removal of a portion of the existing Weber Woods. Recognizing that these woods are a valued neighborhood amenity, the intent is to keep them accessible via a bridge over the pond that connects walking paths and enhances the park. There is also an opportunity to improve the wildlife habitat and restore some ecological integrity. The preliminary assessment indicates that Weber Woods is a “D” quality lowland forest, close to classification as an altered/non-native forest/woodland. The canopy is mostly second-growth cottonwoods, with some box elder, Siberian elm, and American elm. The shrub layer comprises mostly invasive species or weedy natives, and the ground layer is mostly bare. This feature is a foundational component of all refined options due to the significant need for additional storage, although the impact to Weber Woods is smallest in the “Big” refined option and includes pumped outlets in the ”Bigger” and ”Biggest” refined options. 2) The second feature is a surface swale through Weber Park, between existing park features (tennis court, baseball and softball fields, etc.). The proposed swale extends from Grimes Avenue to the expanded Weber Pond, conveying surface flow from the west to the pond in a controlled manner. The swale can double as a walking path in normal conditions and will be used to convey flows during large storm events, such as those with less than a 10% chance of occurring annually. To: Jessica Wilson and Ross Bintner, City of Edina From: Cory Anderson, Greg Williams, and Sarah Stratton Subject: Infrastructure Options to Reduce Flood Risk in the Morningside Neighborhood Date: February 3, 2020 Page: 7 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Mitigation Alternatives Technical Memo\Jan2021 Memo\Morningside_Flood_Infrastructure_Technical_Memo_02032021.docx This feature is not used in the “Big” refined option and is used in the “Bigger” and “Biggest” refined options. The design of this feature must be considered in conjunction with the design of feature #9, as both features increase conveyance and have different sizing constraints. 3) The third feature is a large box culvert conveying flow from the open space area between Lynn Avenue and Kipling Avenue to the storm sewer at the intersection of Grimes Avenue and the W 41st Street corridor. This box culvert could be installed parallel to the existing storm sewer but will more likely replace the existing storm sewer in that location due to space constraints. In normal, low-flow conditions, the box culvert will convey water to the existing storm sewer at Grimes Avenue and the W 41st Street corridor, and water will continue to flow through the storm sewer out to Minneapolis. During larger storm events, the large box culvert will convey significantly more flow than the current storm sewer pipes in that location and will discharge excess flow into the proposed swale in Weber Park (again for large events with less than a 10% chance of occurring annually). This box culvert is also intended to relieve the flow that would occur over Kipling Avenue and then overland between homes to Grimes Avenue. This feature is not used in the “Big” refined option and is used in the “Bigger” and “Biggest” refined options. 4) The fourth feature is an expansion and lowering of the current open space area between Lynn Avenue and Kipling Avenue. This open space is periodically inundated by stormwater. The current normal water level is controlled by the two storm sewer outlets available in the northwest and northeast corners. These outlets will be reconstructed so that the outlet control level is lowered by about 3 feet. Additionally, dredging and clearing of vegetation may be done to create more storage capacity. The City recognizes that the trees along the perimeter of this inundation area have value, offering a wooded and more natural appearance to this open area. Therefore, the outer perimeter of trees will be partially left intact to maintain the appearance from the street and for residents living along Lynn Avenue and Kipling Avenue. The area also has the potential to be improved for natural resource and wildlife habitat. The final design should consider expanding these benefits through natural resource restoration. This feature is used in all three of the refined options. 5) The fifth feature is a large box culvert conveying flow from open park space (Yale Gardens Park) west of Monterey Avenue to the expanded and lowered inundation area between Lynn Avenue and Kipling Avenue. This box culvert could be installed parallel to the existing storm sewer but may end up replacing the storm sewer in that location instead due to space constraints. In normal, low-flow conditions, the box culvert will not carry significant flow or may not carry flow at all because the open space west of Monterey Avenue is intended to store and infiltrate water (feature #6). During larger storm events (those with less than a 4% chance of occurring annually) To: Jessica Wilson and Ross Bintner, City of Edina From: Cory Anderson, Greg Williams, and Sarah Stratton Subject: Infrastructure Options to Reduce Flood Risk in the Morningside Neighborhood Date: February 3, 2020 Page: 8 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Mitigation Alternatives Technical Memo\Jan2021 Memo\Morningside_Flood_Infrastructure_Technical_Memo_02032021.docx the large box culvert will convey flow into the expanded and lowered open space area between Lynn Avenue and Kipling Avenue. This box culvert is also intended to eliminate the overland flow that would occur over Monterey Avenue on the surface between homes towards Lynn Avenue. This feature is only used in the “Biggest” refined option. 6) The sixth feature is an engineered, lowered, open field on the Susan Lindgren School property west of Monterey Avenue. This area currently stores some flood water during large storm events, but storage is limited due, in part, to a rise in the ground elevation in the northeast corner. This feature will require leveling and lowering the field by 2 to 3 feet and enhancing the drainage of the field. With this feature, the annual chance that the existing storm sewer pipe that runs under this space, carrying water from St. Louis Park into Edina, would surcharge is about 20% or less. During smaller storm events, the field would drain quickly and be usable as open park space. This feature is only used in the “Biggest” refined option. 7) The seventh feature is a cleared space to create additional surface storage on the Avail Academy School Property. Consisting largely of trees, there is some flood storage available in this area. The trees would be cleared in the interior of this area, the ground would be lowered by about 5 feet, and the area would be connected via buried storm sewer pipe to the expanded Weber Pond. This area would be inundated with water as the water level in Weber Pond rises above an elevation of approximately 859 feet (during events with a less than 20% annual chance of occurring). Because of the connection to Weber Pond, this area would stay inundated for a long period of time (likely greater than 48 hours). Additionally, the proposed storm sewer pipes along Inglewood Avenue (feature #8) would discharge to this area during larger storm events— those with a 10% or less annual chance of occurring. This feature is only used in the “Biggest” refined option. 8) The eighth feature is improved conveyance along W 40th Street, Grimes Avenue, and new conveyance under Inglewood Avenue. Surface flow in the street along W 40th Street carries some flow from St. Louis Park and some flow from portions of the neighborhood north of W 40th Street. Currently, a significant portion of that water flows south along the surface of Monterey Avenue, Lynn Avenue, and Kipling Avenue towards the open space area between Lynn Avenue and Kipling Avenue and the storm sewer along the W 41st Street corridor. This feature would increase the pipe capacity along W 40th Street; limit the overland and street flow south on Monterey Avenue, Lynn Avenue, and Kipling Avenue via modified street grade; and add storm sewer pipes under Inglewood Avenue. Runoff during low flows and smaller storm events would be carried entirely by storm sewer pipe to the intersection of Grimes Avenue and Inglewood Avenue and then out to Minneapolis via the new pipes under Inglewood Avenue, bypassing the To: Jessica Wilson and Ross Bintner, City of Edina From: Cory Anderson, Greg Williams, and Sarah Stratton Subject: Infrastructure Options to Reduce Flood Risk in the Morningside Neighborhood Date: February 3, 2020 Page: 9 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Mitigation Alternatives Technical Memo\Jan2021 Memo\Morningside_Flood_Infrastructure_Technical_Memo_02032021.docx expanded Weber Pond. Larger storm events would result in street flow down Grimes Avenue, ultimately contributing to the storm sewer discharging to Weber Pond and the surface swale through Weber Park. This feature is only used in the “Biggest” refined option. 9) The ninth feature is increased capacity in the existing storm sewer along W 42nd Street and along a portion of Crocker Avenue (feature #9) and additional capacity along Crocker Avenue to Morningside Avenue, serving homes around Branson Street and Morningside Road (feature #9a). The additional capacity (from larger diameter pipe, and in some cases, where possible, a steepened pipe slope) serves the upstream and midstream portions of the neighborhood by increasing conveyance and moving water away from these areas and by limiting surcharging water nearer to the midstream and downstream areas. The additional capacity also potentially allows for adding stormwater outlets to backyard areas that currently do not have outlets, such as the area west of Crocker Avenue and south of W 42nd Street. The additional capacity along W 42nd Street also allows for a stormwater outlet from the southeast corner of the open space area between Lynn Avenue and Kipling Avenue, further benefiting the homes in that area. In addition, proposed localized grading (within the street right-of-way) may be needed in low areas on the west side of Crocker Avenue to prevent water from overflowing from the street into backyards. The portion of this feature along W 42nd Street and extending south along a portion of Crocker Avenue (feature #9) is used in all three of the refined options. This is one of the more costly features of the refined options. Therefore, only the $10M and $15M cost options include increased pipe capacity that extends farther south to Morningside Road (feature #9a). 10) The tenth feature consists of disconnecting storm sewer pipe at Scott Terrace from storm sewer pipe to the west along W 42nd Street. In the existing condition, the storm sewer pipe under W 42nd Street is under capacity and carries such significant flow that it surcharges, increasing the flood risk to homes near Scott Terrace and W 42nd Street. The storm sewer pipe to the west under W 42nd Street is disconnected and rerouted to Weber Pond under the southeast corner of Weber Park. The increased capacity under W 42nd Street (feature #9) also helps with the flooding in this intersection by limiting surcharge. This feature is used in all three of the refined options. 11) The eleventh feature consists of modifications within Weber Park, in particular to the sports fields. The baseball and softball fields would all be lowered by an average of about 7 feet, and the drainage would be enhanced. The northeast softball field would be mirrored to the southwest corner to make room for the swale (feature #2). The annual chance that this area would be used for temporary flood storage is about 10% or less, and the area would be inundated for less than 24 hours. The area closer to Grimes Avenue would also be leveled, lowered by about 5 feet on To: Jessica Wilson and Ross Bintner, City of Edina From: Cory Anderson, Greg Williams, and Sarah Stratton Subject: Infrastructure Options to Reduce Flood Risk in the Morningside Neighborhood Date: February 3, 2020 Page: 10 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Mitigation Alternatives Technical Memo\Jan2021 Memo\Morningside_Flood_Infrastructure_Technical_Memo_02032021.docx average, and the ice rink would be rebuilt in a new configuration to make room for the park swale. This area would be used for temporary flood storage during events with a less than 2% annual chance of occurring and is estimated to be inundated for less than 12 hours. This feature is only used in the “Biggest” refined option. There are other locations throughout the neighborhood where some localized grading may be required to prevent overflow from the streets into private parcels, particularly into backyards. Locations that have been identified through modeling (based on LiDAR elevation data) are: near the intersection of Grimes Avenue and Inglewood Avenue, along Little Street near Lynn Avenue, along Grimes Avenue, Alden Drive, and Scott Terrace all south of W 42nd Street, the north side of W 42nd Street near Kipling Avenue, and finally along Branson Street, west of Grimes Avenue. These areas may require slightly higher curbs and/or surface grading near the streets to ensure that the stormwater flow stays in the streets during large storm events. Table 1 Summary of individual flood risk reduction features included in the refined options at the three different cost levels Feature Number Feature Description “Big” (~$5M) “Bigger” (~$10M) “Biggest” (~$15M) 1 Expanded Weber Pond and Pump Station1 X X X 2 Surface swale through Weber Park X X 3 Large box culvert from Kipling to Grimes X X 4 Open space area between Lynn and Kipling X X X 5 Large box culvert from Monterey to Lynn X 6 Open field on Susan Lindgren School property west of Monterey X 7 Avail Academy property surface storage X 8 Improved conveyance along W 40th Street, Grimes, and Inglewood X 9 Increased storm sewer capacity along W 42nd Street and north portion of Crocker Avenue X X X 9a Increased storm sewer capacity extending south along Crocker Avenue and additional capacity around Branson and Morningside Road X X 10 Disconnecting storm sewer at Scott Terrace X X X 11 Modifications to sports fields within Weber Park X 1 In the “Big” refined option, the Weber Pond expansion into Weber Woods is smaller and does not include a pump station. To: Jessica Wilson and Ross Bintner, City of Edina From: Cory Anderson, Greg Williams, and Sarah Stratton Subject: Infrastructure Options to Reduce Flood Risk in the Morningside Neighborhood Date: February 3, 2020 Page: 11 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Mitigation Alternatives Technical Memo\Jan2021 Memo\Morningside_Flood_Infrastructure_Technical_Memo_02032021.docx Figure 2 Flood risk reduction features of the refined options (see numbered list and Table 1) Inundation mapping is provided in Attachment B for the ~$15M refined option, in Attachment C for the ~$10M refined option, and Attachment D for the ~$5M refined option. Figure 3 and Figure 4 show the incremental flood storage volume that is gained by layering several components of the flood risk reduction options for both the Weber Pond area and the open space area between Lynn Avenue and Kipling Avenue, respectively. To: Jessica Wilson and Ross Bintner, City of Edina From: Cory Anderson, Greg Williams, and Sarah Stratton Subject: Infrastructure Options to Reduce Flood Risk in the Morningside Neighborhood Date: February 3, 2020 Page: 12 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Mitigation Alternatives Technical Memo\Jan2021 Memo\Morningside_Flood_Infrastructure_Technical_Memo_02032021.docx Figure 3 Incremental flood storage volume gained at Weber Pond with various flood risk reduction options Figure 4 Incremental flood storage volume gained with various flood risk reduction options at the open space area between Lynn Avenue and Kipling Avenue 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Total Flood Storage Volume Available (acre-feet)Incremental Flood Storage Gained at Weber Pond with Various Options Previous Increment(s)This Increment Existing flood storage volume available between the normal water level of Weber Pond and the lowest adjacent home + Expand Weber Pond 2 acres into Weber Woods + Expand Weber an additional 3 acres into Weber Woods and Weber Park + Lower expanded Weber Pond 2.5 feet below normal water level using a pump station + Lower expanded Weber Pond an additional 3 feet prior to storm using predictive pumping 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Total Flood Storage Volume Available (acre-feet)Previous Increment(s)This Increment Existing flood storage volume available between the normal water level and the lowest adjacent home + Expand storage area by 3 acres + Lower the controlling outlet elevation and normal water level by 3 feet To: Jessica Wilson and Ross Bintner, City of Edina From: Cory Anderson, Greg Williams, and Sarah Stratton Subject: Infrastructure Options to Reduce Flood Risk in the Morningside Neighborhood Date: February 3, 2020 Page: 13 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Mitigation Alternatives Technical Memo\Jan2021 Memo\Morningside_Flood_Infrastructure_Technical_Memo_02032021.docx 4.0 Benefits and Costs Barr and City staff developed a method to estimate flood damages based on the peak flood elevations and approximate home elevations. The method is detailed in the City’s 2018 analysis (reference (10)) and summarized in the sidebar. The goal of the analysis was to estimate flood risk and associated impacts at a neighborhood-scale for varying storm events with and without flood risk reduction options. The flood damage estimates reflect “loss potential” in dollars, based on estimated flood loss potential tables published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (reference (11)) and assumptions or judgments about the probability of damage given a flood level relative to the home elevations. Home elevations were based on surveyed basement or first-floor elevations for about half of the homes and estimated from LiDAR-based (elevation data) adjacent grades for the other half of homes using the process documented in reference (10). On an individual home-by-home basis we expect some results to be underestimated and some to be overestimated. However, at the neighborhood scale, we believe that the estimate of total damages is comparable to the level of confidence in the planning-level costs developed for each option. As the City’s flood risk reduction effort continues and surveyed elevations of homes are collected, the analysis can be updated with more accurate elevation information and subsequently improve the damage estimates on both a home- by-home and neighborhood-wide basis. Additionally, as more information about storm sewer connections or rebuilt homes is shared and learned, the estimates of the number of homes impacted and the total damages in dollars is improved. Table 2 shows the number of structures at risk during each of the storm events modeled, up to the 1%- annual-chance event. Table 3 shows the annualized, monetized damage of each condition (existing and with a flood risk reduction option), the annualized monetary benefit of each flood risk reduction option, and the number of structures at risk, removed from risk, and where risk was reduced. The annualized, monetized damage and benefit considers all of the storm events modeled and the probability of those events occurring. The City’s method estimates an annualized flood damage for each structure with consideration for three potential modes of flooding for each structure: 1) Indirect (floodwater against the foundation) 2) Direct (floodwater over the foundation) 3) Sanitary sewer backup A curve is developed for each structure correlating water surface elevation (WSEL) and estimated damage (or “potential loss”). Damages are estimated according to the mode of flooding, severity (i.e., flood depth), structure footprint, and unit area. An annualized damage estimate is generated for each property by integrating the estimated damage at a given WSEL multiplied by the annual exceedance probability between the 5- year and 100-year events, as shown: The benefit of a flood risk reduction action is estimated as the difference in the annualized damage estimates using pre- and post- mitigation water surface elevations between the 20%-annual-chance event and the 1%-annual- chance event. To: Jessica Wilson and Ross Bintner, City of Edina From: Cory Anderson, Greg Williams, and Sarah Stratton Subject: Infrastructure Options to Reduce Flood Risk in the Morningside Neighborhood Date: February 3, 2020 Page: 14 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Mitigation Alternatives Technical Memo\Jan2021 Memo\Morningside_Flood_Infrastructure_Technical_Memo_02032021.docx Table 2 Summary of the number of structures with potential damage by any of the three modes of damage (direct surface water, indirect groundwater, or sanitary backup) by storm event up to the 1%-annual-chance event (ACE) [100-year event] Condition 5-year 20% ACE 10-year 10% ACE 25-year 4% ACE 50-year 2% ACE 100-year 1% ACE 500-year 0.2$ ACE Existing 95 107 115 126 139 160 “Big” 80 94 103 116 134 154 “Bigger” 76 80 84 95 111 141 “Biggest” 76 80 82 89 102 133 Table 3 Summary of assessment of potential damages and impacts to structures Condition Annualized Damage, $ Annualized Benefit, $ # of Structures with Risk Removed # of Structures with Risk Reduced # of Structures with Risk Increased # of Structures with Risk Added Total Structures at Risk of Flood Damage Existing $362,600 --- --- --- --- --- 160 “Big” $260,400 $102,200 6 106 0 0 154 “Bigger” $190,100 $172,500 19 138 0 0 141 “Biggest” $181,800 $180,800 27 139 0 0 133 Table 4 Summary of the potential neighborhood-wide damages in dollars due to flooding by storm event up to the 1%-annual-chance event (ACE) [100-year event] Condition 5-year 20% ACE 10-year 10% ACE 25-year 4% ACE 50-year 2% ACE 100-year 1% ACE Existing $1,037,000 $1,588,000 $1,999,000 $2,349,000 $3,003,000 “Big” $703,000 $1,149,000 $1,413,000 $1,898,000 $2,712,000 “Bigger” $661,000 $838,000 $1,081,000 $1,261,000 $1,617,000 “Biggest” $660,500 $828,500 $995,600 $1,185,000 $1,391,000 To: Jessica Wilson and Ross Bintner, City of Edina From: Cory Anderson, Greg Williams, and Sarah Stratton Subject: Infrastructure Options to Reduce Flood Risk in the Morningside Neighborhood Date: February 3, 2020 Page: 15 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Mitigation Alternatives Technical Memo\Jan2021 Memo\Morningside_Flood_Infrastructure_Technical_Memo_02032021.docx Table 5 Summary of the neighborhood-wide benefits (reduction in damages) in dollars by storm event up to the 1%-annual-chance event (ACE) [100-year event] Condition 5-year 20% ACE 10-year 10% ACE 25-year 4% ACE 50-year 2% ACE 100-year 1% ACE Existing --- --- --- --- --- “Big” $334,000 $439,000 $586,000 $451,000 $291,000 “Bigger” $376,000 $750,000 $918,000 $1,088,000 $1,386,000 “Biggest” $377,000 $759,000 $1,003,000 $1,164,000 $1,612,000 The estimates of damages neighborhood-wide (Table 4) and the benefits (Table 5) are not the annualized damages and benefits, but the estimated total (in dollars) for particular storm events (20%-annual-chance event through 1%-annual-chance event). They show the total neighborhood-wide estimated damage (dollars) and benefit (reduction in damages in dollars) for each of the listed storm events. An Engineer’s planning-level opinion of probable construction cost had been developed for each of the previous flood risk reduction options (reference (3) and (5)). The costs were updated to reflect the three levels of the refined options (“Big,” “Bigger,” and “Biggest”) and are included as Attachment E. The planning-level opinions of probable construction cost are intended to aid in evaluating and comparing flood risk reduction options and should not be assumed as absolute values for each option. These opinions of probable cost generally correspond to standards established by the Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE). This cost estimate is characterized by limited project definition, widescale use of parametric models to calculate estimated costs (i.e., making extensive use of order-of- magnitude costs from similar projects or proposals), and uncertainty. The estimated accuracy range for the opinions of probable cost developed as part of this analysis is -30% to +50%. All estimated construction costs are presented in 2020 U.S. dollars and include costs for engineering and project administration. Further details of the planning-level opinions of probable cost are included in the memo detailing the previous effort (reference (3)). Estimated construction costs were compared to the total annualized benefit of each flood mitigation option, divided over an assumed 60-year period (valuable life of the project). Benefit/cost (B/C) ratios greater than one (1) indicate the estimated reduction in flood damage expected from a given mitigation option is greater than the cost to implement that mitigation option. B/C ratios are presented in Table 6. To: Jessica Wilson and Ross Bintner, City of Edina From: Cory Anderson, Greg Williams, and Sarah Stratton Subject: Infrastructure Options to Reduce Flood Risk in the Morningside Neighborhood Date: February 3, 2020 Page: 16 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Mitigation Alternatives Technical Memo\Jan2021 Memo\Morningside_Flood_Infrastructure_Technical_Memo_02032021.docx Table 6 Economic assessment of the flood risk reduction options Condition Annualized Damage, $ Annualized Benefit, $ Improvement Cost, $ Annual Improvement Cost, $ Benefit – Cost Benefit / Cost Ratio Existing $362,600 --- --- --- --- --- “Big” $260,400 $102,200 $5.5M $92,000 $10,200 1.1 “Bigger” $190,100 $172,500 $11.2M $187,000 -$14,500 0.9 “Biggest” $181,800 $180,800 $15.8M $263,000 -$82,200 0.7 The “Big” option of limited additional storage and conveyance capacity is the only option with a B/C ratio greater than 1. However, this refined option reduces flood risk to the fewest number of homes and has limited potential for adding future flood risk reduction efforts. The “Biggest” option has the lowest B/C ratio at 0.7. Additionally, the “Biggest” option reduces risk for a number of homes that is similar to the “Bigger” option, which costs nearly $5M less to design and construct. Regardless of the resulting B/C ratios, the ETE discussions with additional local engineering experts confirmed that the refined options use the most cost-effective approaches applicable in this area. The design phase of any selected flood risk reduction option will also provide further opportunity to evaluate expanding benefits and reducing cost. Additional discussion on the costs and benefits of several of the components is also provided in Section 5.0. 5.0 Tradeoffs and Opportunities To provide a significant flood risk reduction benefit in the Morningside neighborhood, large infrastructure changes are required. With some of those large infrastructure changes come similarly large changes to the landscape. Because the neighborhood is mostly developed and open space is limited, the remaining open space is highly valued by the community. However, as described herein, additional storage is a necessary component to reduce flood risk, and storage underground and out of sight is not economically feasible for this site. Therefore, there are some social, aesthetic, and recreational tradeoffs and opportunities to consider as the City evaluates the feasibility of the refined options. The swale through Weber Park (feature #2) will utilize park space and require moving or reconfiguring some athletic fields. • The benefits or opportunities are that the swale collects and concentrates runoff from the park (versus diffusive flow in the existing condition), has high conveyance capacity as an open channel feature, and could have water quality and infiltration benefits. If properly designed, the swale could be an attractive feature that also provides clean-water benefits. To: Jessica Wilson and Ross Bintner, City of Edina From: Cory Anderson, Greg Williams, and Sarah Stratton Subject: Infrastructure Options to Reduce Flood Risk in the Morningside Neighborhood Date: February 3, 2020 Page: 17 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Mitigation Alternatives Technical Memo\Jan2021 Memo\Morningside_Flood_Infrastructure_Technical_Memo_02032021.docx • If the loss of the space in Weber Park is not acceptable, an alternative means of conveyance is needed. It may be possible to further increase the pipe capacity (increase pipe size) under W 42nd Street (feature #9) to Weber Pond. This will need more study in the design phase to confirm constructability with related utility conflicts. The box culvert outlet (feature #3) from the open space between Lynn Avenue and Kipling Avenue would be eliminated and the new outlet from the southeast corner of the inundation area would become much larger. With this tradeoff, the potential for water quality and infiltration benefits is lost, and stormwater is kept underground and hidden, removing the potential for a water feature in Weber Park. The expansion of Weber Pond into the woods to the north modifies that open space from its current use. • The benefits or opportunities are that the expanded pond provides the storage required to maximize neighborhood flood risk reduction at a much lower cost than underground storage. The expanded pond could also provide passive recreation benefit through improvement of trails and enhancement of the natural resource habitat. The design phase should employ landscape architectural design to refine and promote a well-utilized recreational space if the open water feature is maintained; this may include boardwalks, viewing alcoves, or other community features. • If the loss of some of the woods to the north of Weber Pond is not acceptable, an alternative means of storage is needed. If the woods are more valuable to the community than the sports fields, then it may be preferable to leave the woods intact and expand Weber Pond into the sports fields area (i.e., making feature #11 actual pond space and removing the sports fields). The anticipated use of predictive pumping significantly increases the effective storage available within the neighborhood, but introduces some uncertainty related to feasibility and operations. • The benefits or opportunities of predictive pumping include a significant increase in available storage achieved with a relatively small increase in cost. Increased storage is a foundational component of the refined options, and predictive pumping allows more effective storage to be achieved with a smaller footprint and, therefore, less impact to existing natural areas and open space. • Predictive pumping has operational risks that may affect performance (e.g., pump failure, difficulty in predicting large precipitation events, downstream water levels that limit pumping). Uncertainty related to predictive pumping is evaluated in greater detail in Section 3.1 of reference (5). These risks may be mitigated by the development of an operating plan. Additional uncertainty in feasibility (e.g., permitting requirements) must also be considered during optimization of any refined options including predictive pumping (see Section 6.0). Additional storage will be required to realize similar benefits without predictive pumping. Storage options may include Weber Park athletic fields, private property, and/or Minikhada Vista Park in St. Louis Park. Private property and St. Louis Park property each come with additional cost and To: Jessica Wilson and Ross Bintner, City of Edina From: Cory Anderson, Greg Williams, and Sarah Stratton Subject: Infrastructure Options to Reduce Flood Risk in the Morningside Neighborhood Date: February 3, 2020 Page: 18 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Mitigation Alternatives Technical Memo\Jan2021 Memo\Morningside_Flood_Infrastructure_Technical_Memo_02032021.docx tradeoffs that are uncertain because they are not under the City’s direct control. Several of these options were removed from consideration due to cost, complexity, and other factors (e.g., being outside City jurisdiction). The “Big” option provides a measure of the benefits achieved without the predictive pumping. Modifications to the storm sewer present an opportunity to alter the large conveyance pipe underneath Crocker Avenue and W 42nd Street. • The benefits or opportunities of modifying the storm sewer at Crocker Avenue and W 42nd Street include the potential to add connections to alleviate backyard flooding issues. The flood risk in these types of areas is primarily due to winter melt, which allows residents the ability to anticipate issues and prepare temporary pumping or other mitigation (due to the relatively slow nature of winter melt). • Tradeoffs to this possible action include the need for land acquisition and/or easements for access and structures. Additionally, connection of landlocked areas will transfer flood risk to downstream areas where it may pose greater risk to structures and will require additional storage. This opportunity was removed from consideration at this point in time due to concerns about feasibility and the City’s preference to avoid acquisitions. It is worth noting however that the refined options currently provide more benefit in the “downstream” portions of the neighborhood where there are large storage features (see Figures B-7, C-7, and D-7 in Appendices B, C, and D, respectively) so that in the future, additional stormwater connections can be made, thereby increasing benefits throughout the neighborhood. 6.0 Conclusions The Morningside neighborhood has a high potential for flood damage. Detailed flood-related studies have been completed in the past few years in advance of expected street reconstruction in 2022 and 2023. These studies have continually and transparently refined flood risk reduction options, considering the economics, the benefits, and the values of the community, using direct engagement with the Flood Risk Reduction Task Force for the earlier effort (July 2019 through February 2020), and a specific engagement plan as part of this effort. Given the space available in the neighborhood, the values of the community, and the funding that is expected to be available, refined options to reduce flood risk in an optimized way have been summarized and presented in this memo. The “Big” option of limited additional storage and conveyance capacity is the only option with a benefit- to-cost (B/C) ratio greater than 1. However, this refined option reduces flood risk to the fewest number of homes with limited potential for coordination with future flood risk reduction efforts. The “Bigger” option is the minimum required to extend the benefit neighborhood wide. The “Biggest” option has the lowest B/C ratio at 0.7. Additionally, the “Biggest” option reduces risk for a number of homes that is similar to the “Bigger” option, which costs nearly $5M less to design and construct To: Jessica Wilson and Ross Bintner, City of Edina From: Cory Anderson, Greg Williams, and Sarah Stratton Subject: Infrastructure Options to Reduce Flood Risk in the Morningside Neighborhood Date: February 3, 2020 Page: 19 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Mitigation Alternatives Technical Memo\Jan2021 Memo\Morningside_Flood_Infrastructure_Technical_Memo_02032021.docx Upon approval to continue pursuing final design of a flood risk reduction project in the Morningside neighborhood, the chosen refined option should be optimized once more in final design to match the overall cost with the approved funding. This effort will coincide with additional evaluation of predictive pumping feasibility and permitting, including coordination with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR), Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD), and the City of Minneapolis. The final design should consider detailed topographic survey data, wetland permitting, potential flood insurance impacts, groundwater levels, and soils information from boreholes. The final design should also reconsider the tradeoffs and opportunities and be reassessed for geographical balance that addresses risk reduction and benefits, as discussed in Section 5.0. After optimizing the option to match funding and account for tradeoffs and opportunities, the option should also be reassessed to finalize the estimate of flood damage reduction benefits. 7.0 References 1. City of Edina. 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan. Edina, MN : s.n., July 2018. 2. —. 2020 Street Reconstruction Projects. City of Edina. [Online] https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/2020StreetRecon. 3. Barr Engineering Co. Morningside Neighborhood Flood Risk Reduction Strategy Conceptual Study. November, 2018. 4. —. Morningside XP-SWMM Modeling. April, 2020. 5. —. Morningside Neighborhood Flood Infrastructure Project. October, 2020. 6. City of Edina. Flood Risk Reduction Strategy. s.l. : City of Edina Engineering Department, 2020. 7. —. City Service Status: Flooding and Drainage. City of Edina. [Online] 8. —. Flooding and Drainage. City of Edina. [Online] August 2020. https://www.edinamn.gov/371/Flooding-and-Drainage. 9. —. Better Together. Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project. [Online] August 2020. https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/6145/widgets/19058/documents/11586. 10. —. Edina Morningside Neighborhood Flood Risk Reduction Concepts. Edina, MN : s.n., September 2018. 11. FEMA. Estimated Flood Loss Potential. Flood Loss Estimations 2017. [Online] [Cited: September 1, 2018.] https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/1499290622913- 0bcd74f47bf20aa94998a5a920837710/Flood_Loss_Estimations_2017.pdf. Attachment A Existing Conditions Inundation Maps and Structure Impacts Kojetin Park Open Space 5 OpenSpace 6 WeberField Park Weber Woods LynnFrance40th 42nd Morningside 44th Sunnyside Littel SidellGrimesNatchezOakdale Cur ve Eaton45th InglewoodBranson CrockerAldenScottKiplingMontereyBarr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-09-15 19:30 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Morningside FRRS 23271798\Maps\Fig A-1 Existing Conditions 20% AEP.mxd User: EMA 20% ACE INUNDATION AND TOTAL FLOOD RISK EXISTING CONDITIONSFIGURE A-1 Imagery: Hennepin County, 2018 Inundation Depth (feet) < 0.1 feet 0.1 - 1 feet 1 - 3 feet 3 - 6 feet 6 - 9 feet 9 - 12 feet > 12 feet Total Flood Risk (160 Homes at Risk) 2 3 4 No Risk1 - Lowest Risk 5 - Highest Risk !;N 0 175 350 Feet Note: Total Flood Risk accountsfor all storm events modeled, notthe risk for an individual storm. Kojetin Park Open Space 5 OpenSpace 6 WeberField Park Weber Woods LynnFrance40th 42nd Morningside 44th Sunnyside Littel SidellGrimesNatchezOakdale Cur ve Eaton45th InglewoodBranson CrockerAldenScottKiplingMontereyBarr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-09-15 19:33 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Morningside FRRS 23271798\Maps\Fig A-2 Existing Conditions 10% AEP.mxd User: EMA 10% ACE INUNDATION AND TOTAL FLOOD RISK EXISTING CONDITIONSFIGURE A-2 Imagery: Hennepin County, 2018 Inundation Depth (feet) < 0.1 feet 0.1 - 1 feet 1 - 3 feet 3 - 6 feet 6 - 9 feet 9 - 12 feet > 12 feet Total Flood Risk (160 Homes at Risk) 2 3 4 No Risk1 - Lowest Risk 5 - Highest Risk !;N 0 175 350 Feet Note: Total Flood Risk accountsfor all storm events modeled, notthe risk for an individual storm. Kojetin Park Open Space 5 OpenSpace 6 WeberField Park Weber Woods LynnFrance40th 42nd Morningside 44th Sunnyside Littel SidellGrimesNatchezOakdale Cur ve Eaton45th InglewoodBranson CrockerAldenScottKiplingMontereyBarr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-09-15 19:33 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Morningside FRRS 23271798\Maps\Fig A-3 Existing Conditions 4% AEP.mxd User: EMA 4% ACE INUNDATION AND TOTAL FLOOD RISK EXISTING CONDITIONSFIGURE A-3 Imagery: Hennepin County, 2018 Inundation Depth (feet) < 0.1 feet 0.1 - 1 feet 1 - 3 feet 3 - 6 feet 6 - 9 feet 9 - 12 feet > 12 feet Total Flood Risk (160 Homes at Risk) 2 3 4 No Risk1 - Lowest Risk 5 - Highest Risk !;N 0 175 350 Feet Note: Total Flood Risk accountsfor all storm events modeled, notthe risk for an individual storm. Kojetin Park Open Space 5 OpenSpace 6 WeberField Park Weber Woods LynnFrance40th 42nd Morningside 44th Sunnyside Littel SidellGrimesNatchezOakdale Cur ve Eaton45th InglewoodBranson CrockerAldenScottKiplingMontereyBarr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-09-15 19:33 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Morningside FRRS 23271798\Maps\Fig A-4 Existing Conditions 2% AEP.mxd User: EMA 2% ACE INUNDATION AND TOTAL FLOOD RISK EXISTING CONDITIONSFIGURE A-4 Inundation Depth (feet) < 0.1 feet 0.1 - 1 feet 1 - 3 feet 3 - 6 feet 6 - 9 feet 9 - 12 feet > 12 feet Total Flood Risk (160 Homes at Risk) 2 3 4 No Risk1 - Lowest Risk 5 - Highest Risk !;N 0 175 350 Feet Note: Total Flood Risk accountsfor all storm events modeled, notthe risk for an individual storm. Kojetin Park Open Space 5 OpenSpace 6 WeberField Park Weber Woods LynnFrance40th 42nd Morningside 44th Sunnyside Littel SidellGrimesNatchezOakdale Cur ve Eaton45th InglewoodBranson CrockerAldenScottKiplingMontereyBarr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-09-16 07:58 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Morningside FRRS 23271798\Maps\Fig A-5 Existing Conditions 1% AEP.mxd User: EMA 1% ACE INUNDATION AND TOTAL FLOOD RISK EXISTING CONDITIONSFIGURE A-5 !;N Inundation Depth (feet) < 0.1 feet 0.1 - 1 feet 1 - 3 feet 3 - 6 feet 6 - 9 feet 9 - 12 feet > 12 feet 0 175 350 Feet Total Flood Risk (160 Homes at Risk) 2 3 4 No Risk1 - Lowest Risk 5 - Highest Risk Note: Total Flood Risk accountsfor all storm events modeled, notthe risk for an individual storm. Kojetin Park Open Space 5 OpenSpace 6 WeberField Park Weber Woods LynnFrance40th 42nd Morningside 44th Sunnyside Littel SidellGrimesNatchezOakdale Cur ve Eaton45th InglewoodBranson CrockerAldenScottKiplingMontereyBarr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-09-15 19:33 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Morningside FRRS 23271798\Maps\Fig A-6 Existing Conditions 0.2% AEP.mxd User: EMA 0.2% ACE INUNDATION AND TOTAL FLOOD RISK EXISTING CONDITIONSFIGURE A-6 Imagery: Hennepin County, 2018 Inundation Depth (feet) < 0.1 feet 0.1 - 1 feet 1 - 3 feet 3 - 6 feet 6 - 9 feet 9 - 12 feet > 12 feet Total Flood Risk (160 Homes at Risk) 2 3 4 No Risk1 - Lowest Risk 5 - Highest Risk !;N 0 175 350 Feet Note: Total Flood Risk accountsfor all storm events modeled, notthe risk for an individual storm. P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Mitigation Alternatives Technical Memo\Jan2021 Memo\Morningside_Flood_Infrastructure_Technical_Memo_02032021.docx Attachment B Refined Option at the ~$15M Cost Inundation Maps and Structure Impacts Kojetin Park Open Space 5 OpenSpace 6 WeberField Park Weber Woods LynnFrance40th 42nd Morningside 44th Sunnyside Littel SidellGrimesNatchezOakdale Cur ve Eaton45th InglewoodBranson CrockerAldenScottKiplingMontereyBarr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-09-15 20:05 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Morningside FRRS 23271798\Maps\Fig F-1 Option 10 20% AEP.mxd User: EMA 20% ACE INUNDATION AND TOTAL FLOOD RISK REFINED COMBINATION OPTION, ~$15M COST FIGURE B-1 Imagery: Hennepin County, 2018 Inundation Depth (feet) < 0.1 feet 0.1 - 1 feet 1 - 3 feet 3 - 6 feet 6 - 9 feet 9 - 12 feet > 12 feet 2 3 4 1 - Lowest Risk 5 - Highest Risk No Risk Added Risk (0 home) Homes Removed from Risk (27 homes) !;N 0 175 350 Feet Note: Total Flood Risk accountsfor all storm events modeled, notthe risk for an individual storm. Total Flood Risk (133 Homes at Risk) Kojetin Park Open Space 5 OpenSpace 6 WeberField Park Weber Woods LynnFrance40th 42nd Morningside 44th Sunnyside Littel SidellGrimesNatchezOakdale Cur ve Eaton45th InglewoodBranson CrockerAldenScottKiplingMontereyBarr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-09-15 20:05 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Morningside FRRS 23271798\Maps\Fig F-1 Option 10 20% AEP.mxd User: EMA 10% ACE INUNDATION AND TOTAL FLOOD RISK REFINED COMBINATION OPTION, ~$15M COST FIGURE B-2 Imagery: Hennepin County, 2018 Inundation Depth (feet) < 0.1 feet 0.1 - 1 feet 1 - 3 feet 3 - 6 feet 6 - 9 feet 9 - 12 feet > 12 feet 2 3 4 1 - Lowest Risk 5 - Highest Risk No Risk Added Risk (0 home) Homes Removed from Risk (27 homes) !;N 0 175 350 Feet Note: Total Flood Risk accountsfor all storm events modeled, notthe risk for an individual storm. Total Flood Risk (133 Homes at Risk) Kojetin Park Open Space 5 OpenSpace 6 WeberField Park Weber Woods LynnFrance40th 42nd Morningside 44th Sunnyside Littel SidellGrimesNatchezOakdale Cur ve Eaton45th InglewoodBranson CrockerAldenScottKiplingMontereyBarr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-09-15 20:05 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Morningside FRRS 23271798\Maps\Fig F-1 Option 10 20% AEP.mxd User: EMA 4% ACE INUNDATION AND TOTAL FLOOD RISK REFINED COMBINATION OPTION, ~$15M COST FIGURE B-3 Imagery: Hennepin County, 2018 Inundation Depth (feet) < 0.1 feet 0.1 - 1 feet 1 - 3 feet 3 - 6 feet 6 - 9 feet 9 - 12 feet > 12 feet 2 3 4 1 - Lowest Risk 5 - Highest Risk No Risk Added Risk (0 home) Homes Removed from Risk (27 homes) !;N 0 175 350 Feet Note: Total Flood Risk accountsfor all storm events modeled, notthe risk for an individual storm. Total Flood Risk (133 Homes at Risk) Kojetin Park Open Space 5 OpenSpace 6 WeberField Park Weber Woods LynnFrance40th 42nd Morningside 44th Sunnyside Littel SidellGrimesNatchezOakdale Cur ve Eaton45th InglewoodBranson CrockerAldenScottKiplingMontereyBarr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-09-15 20:05 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Morningside FRRS 23271798\Maps\Fig F-1 Option 10 20% AEP.mxd User: EMA 2% ACE INUNDATION AND TOTAL FLOOD RISK REFINED COMBINATION OPTION, ~$15M COST FIGURE B-4 Imagery: Hennepin County, 2018 Inundation Depth (feet) < 0.1 feet 0.1 - 1 feet 1 - 3 feet 3 - 6 feet 6 - 9 feet 9 - 12 feet > 12 feet 2 3 4 1 - Lowest Risk 5 - Highest Risk No Risk Added Risk (0 home) Homes Removed from Risk (27 homes) !;N 0 175 350 Feet Note: Total Flood Risk accountsfor all storm events modeled, notthe risk for an individual storm. Total Flood Risk (133 Homes at Risk) Kojetin Park Open Space 5 OpenSpace 6 WeberField Park Weber Woods LynnFrance40th 42nd Morningside 44th Sunnyside Littel SidellGrimesNatchezOakdale Cur ve Eaton45th InglewoodBranson CrockerAldenScottKiplingMontereyBarr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-09-15 20:05 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Morningside FRRS 23271798\Maps\Fig F-1 Option 10 20% AEP.mxd User: EMA 1% ACE INUNDATION AND TOTAL FLOOD RISK REFINED COMBINATION OPTION, ~$15M COST FIGURE B-5 Imagery: Hennepin County, 2018 Inundation Depth (feet) < 0.1 feet 0.1 - 1 feet 1 - 3 feet 3 - 6 feet 6 - 9 feet 9 - 12 feet > 12 feet 2 3 4 1 - Lowest Risk 5 - Highest Risk No Risk Added Risk (0 home) Homes Removed from Risk (27 homes) !;N 0 175 350 Feet Note: Total Flood Risk accountsfor all storm events modeled, notthe risk for an individual storm. Total Flood Risk (133 Homes at Risk) Kojetin Park Open Space 5 OpenSpace 6 WeberField Park Weber Woods LynnFrance40th 42nd Morningside 44th Sunnyside Littel SidellGrimesNatchezOakdale Cur ve Eaton45th InglewoodBranson CrockerAldenScottKiplingMontereyBarr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-09-15 20:05 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Morningside FRRS 23271798\Maps\Fig F-1 Option 10 20% AEP.mxd User: EMA 0.2% ACE INUNDATION AND TOTAL FLOOD RISK REFINED COMBINATION OPTION, ~$15M COST FIGURE B-6 Imagery: Hennepin County, 2018 Inundation Depth (feet) < 0.1 feet 0.1 - 1 feet 1 - 3 feet 3 - 6 feet 6 - 9 feet 9 - 12 feet > 12 feet 2 3 4 1 - Lowest Risk 5 - Highest Risk No Risk Added Risk (0 home) Homes Removed from Risk (27 homes) !;N 0 175 350 Feet Note: Total Flood Risk accountsfor all storm events modeled, notthe risk for an individual storm. Total Flood Risk (133 Homes at Risk) $15,600; 64%$51,700; 98% $20,100; 40% $1,600; 6% $500; 4% $63,200; 79% $3,400; 14%$17,400; 25%$7,200; 28% Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China(Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS UserCommunity Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2021-01-18 16:20 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Morningside FRRS 23271798\Maps\Fig B-7 Option 12 Zone Benefits.mxd User: EMA FIGURE B-7 0 175 350 Feet Primary Structures Annualized Damage Reduction, $ < $10,000 $10,000 - $20,000 $20,000 - $30,000 $30,000 - $40,000 $40,000 - $50,000 $50,000 - $60,000 $60,000 - $70,000 TOTAL FLOOD RISKREDUCTION AS ADOLLAR AMOUNT ANDAS A PERCENTAGE REFINED COMBINATIONOPTION, ~$15M COST P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Mitigation Alternatives Technical Memo\Jan2021 Memo\Morningside_Flood_Infrastructure_Technical_Memo_02032021.docx Attachment C Refined Option at the ~$10M Cost Inundation Maps and Structure Impacts Kojetin Park Open Space 5 OpenSpace 6 WeberField Park Weber Woods LynnFrance40th 42nd Morningside 44th Sunnyside Littel SidellGrimesNatchezOakdale Cur ve Eaton45th InglewoodBranson CrockerAldenScottKiplingMontereyBarr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-09-15 20:05 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Morningside FRRS 23271798\Maps\Fig F-1 Option 10 20% AEP.mxd User: EMA 20% ACE INUNDATION AND TOTAL FLOOD RISK REFINED COMBINATION OPTION, ~$10M COST FIGURE C-1 Imagery: Hennepin County, 2018 Inundation Depth (feet) < 0.1 feet 0.1 - 1 feet 1 - 3 feet 3 - 6 feet 6 - 9 feet 9 - 12 feet > 12 feet 2 3 4 1 - Lowest Risk 5 - Highest Risk No Risk Added Risk (0 home) Homes Removed from Risk (19 homes) !;N 0 175 350 Feet Note: Total Flood Risk accountsfor all storm events modeled, notthe risk for an individual storm. Total Flood Risk (141 Homes at Risk) Kojetin Park Open Space 5 OpenSpace 6 WeberField Park Weber Woods LynnFrance40th 42nd Morningside 44th Sunnyside Littel SidellGrimesNatchezOakdale Cur ve Eaton45th InglewoodBranson CrockerAldenScottKiplingMontereyBarr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-09-15 20:05 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Morningside FRRS 23271798\Maps\Fig F-1 Option 10 20% AEP.mxd User: EMA 10% ACE INUNDATION AND TOTAL FLOOD RISK REFINED COMBINATION OPTION, ~$10M COST FIGURE C-2 Imagery: Hennepin County, 2018 Inundation Depth (feet) < 0.1 feet 0.1 - 1 feet 1 - 3 feet 3 - 6 feet 6 - 9 feet 9 - 12 feet > 12 feet 2 3 4 1 - Lowest Risk 5 - Highest Risk No Risk Added Risk (0 home) Homes Removed from Risk (19 homes) !;N 0 175 350 Feet Note: Total Flood Risk accountsfor all storm events modeled, notthe risk for an individual storm. Total Flood Risk (141 Homes at Risk) Kojetin Park Open Space 5 OpenSpace 6 WeberField Park Weber Woods LynnFrance40th 42nd Morningside 44th Sunnyside Littel SidellGrimesNatchezOakdale Cur ve Eaton45th InglewoodBranson CrockerAldenScottKiplingMontereyBarr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-09-15 20:05 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Morningside FRRS 23271798\Maps\Fig F-1 Option 10 20% AEP.mxd User: EMA 4% ACE INUNDATION AND TOTAL FLOOD RISK REFINED COMBINATION OPTION, ~$10M COST FIGURE C-3 Imagery: Hennepin County, 2018 Inundation Depth (feet) < 0.1 feet 0.1 - 1 feet 1 - 3 feet 3 - 6 feet 6 - 9 feet 9 - 12 feet > 12 feet 2 3 4 1 - Lowest Risk 5 - Highest Risk No Risk Added Risk (0 home) Homes Removed from Risk (19 homes) !;N 0 175 350 Feet Note: Total Flood Risk accountsfor all storm events modeled, notthe risk for an individual storm. Total Flood Risk (141 Homes at Risk) Kojetin Park Open Space 5 OpenSpace 6 WeberField Park Weber Woods LynnFrance40th 42nd Morningside 44th Sunnyside Littel SidellGrimesNatchezOakdale Cur ve Eaton45th InglewoodBranson CrockerAldenScottKiplingMontereyBarr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-09-15 20:05 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Morningside FRRS 23271798\Maps\Fig F-1 Option 10 20% AEP.mxd User: EMA 2% ACE INUNDATION AND TOTAL FLOOD RISK REFINED COMBINATION OPTION, ~$10M COST FIGURE C-4 Imagery: Hennepin County, 2018 Inundation Depth (feet) < 0.1 feet 0.1 - 1 feet 1 - 3 feet 3 - 6 feet 6 - 9 feet 9 - 12 feet > 12 feet 2 3 4 1 - Lowest Risk 5 - Highest Risk No Risk Added Risk (0 home) Homes Removed from Risk (19 homes) !;N 0 175 350 Feet Note: Total Flood Risk accountsfor all storm events modeled, notthe risk for an individual storm. Total Flood Risk (141 Homes at Risk) Kojetin Park Open Space 5 OpenSpace 6 WeberField Park Weber Woods LynnFrance40th 42nd Morningside 44th Sunnyside Littel SidellGrimesNatchezOakdale Cur ve Eaton45th InglewoodBranson CrockerAldenScottKiplingMontereyBarr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-09-15 20:05 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Morningside FRRS 23271798\Maps\Fig F-1 Option 10 20% AEP.mxd User: EMA 1% ACE INUNDATION AND TOTAL FLOOD RISK REFINED COMBINATION OPTION, ~$10M COST FIGURE C-5 Imagery: Hennepin County, 2018 Inundation Depth (feet) < 0.1 feet 0.1 - 1 feet 1 - 3 feet 3 - 6 feet 6 - 9 feet 9 - 12 feet > 12 feet 2 3 4 1 - Lowest Risk 5 - Highest Risk No Risk Added Risk (0 home) Homes Removed from Risk (19 homes) !;N 0 175 350 Feet Note: Total Flood Risk accountsfor all storm events modeled, notthe risk for an individual storm. Total Flood Risk (141 Homes at Risk) Kojetin Park Open Space 5 OpenSpace 6 WeberField Park Weber Woods LynnFrance40th 42nd Morningside 44th Sunnyside Littel SidellGrimesNatchezOakdale Cur ve Eaton45th InglewoodBranson CrockerAldenScottKiplingMontereyBarr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-09-15 20:05 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Morningside FRRS 23271798\Maps\Fig F-1 Option 10 20% AEP.mxd User: EMA 0.2% ACE INUNDATION AND TOTAL FLOOD RISK REFINED COMBINATION OPTION, ~$10M COST FIGURE C-6 Imagery: Hennepin County, 2018 Inundation Depth (feet) < 0.1 feet 0.1 - 1 feet 1 - 3 feet 3 - 6 feet 6 - 9 feet 9 - 12 feet > 12 feet 2 3 4 1 - Lowest Risk 5 - Highest Risk No Risk Added Risk (0 home) Homes Removed from Risk (19 homes) !;N 0 175 350 Feet Note: Total Flood Risk accountsfor all storm events modeled, notthe risk for an individual storm. Total Flood Risk (141 Homes at Risk) $13,100; 54%$48,900; 93% $17,800; 35% $1,600; 6% $500; 4% $63,000; 79% $3,400; 14%$16,900; 24%$7,200; 28% Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China(Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS UserCommunity Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2021-01-18 16:15 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Morningside FRRS 23271798\Maps\Fig C-7 Option 12 Zone Benefits.mxd User: EMA FIGURE C-7 0 175 350 Feet Primary Structures Annualized Damage Reduction, $ < $10,000 $10,000 - $20,000 $20,000 - $30,000 $30,000 - $40,000 $40,000 - $50,000 $50,000 - $60,000 $60,000 - $70,000 TOTAL FLOOD RISKREDUCTION AS ADOLLAR AMOUNT ANDAS A PERCENTAGE REFINED COMBINATIONOPTION, ~$10M COST P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Mitigation Alternatives Technical Memo\Jan2021 Memo\Morningside_Flood_Infrastructure_Technical_Memo_02032021.docx Attachment D Refined Option at the ~$5M Cost Inundation Maps and Structure Impacts Kojetin Park Open Space 5 OpenSpace 6 WeberField Park Weber Woods LynnFrance40th 42nd Morningside 44th Sunnyside Littel SidellGrimesNatchezOakdale Cur ve Eaton45th InglewoodBranson CrockerAldenScottKiplingMontereyBarr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-09-15 20:05 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Morningside FRRS 23271798\Maps\Fig F-1 Option 10 20% AEP.mxd User: EMA 20% ACE INUNDATION AND TOTAL FLOOD RISK REFINED COMBINATION OPTION, ~$5M COST FIGURE D-1 Imagery: Hennepin County, 2018 Inundation Depth (feet) < 0.1 feet 0.1 - 1 feet 1 - 3 feet 3 - 6 feet 6 - 9 feet 9 - 12 feet > 12 feet 2 3 4 1 - Lowest Risk 5 - Highest Risk No Risk Added Risk (0 home) Homes Removed from Risk (6 homes) !;N 0 175 350 Feet Note: Total Flood Risk accountsfor all storm events modeled, notthe risk for an individual storm. Total Flood Risk (154 Homes at Risk) Kojetin Park Open Space 5 OpenSpace 6 WeberField Park Weber Woods LynnFrance40th 42nd Morningside 44th Sunnyside Littel SidellGrimesNatchezOakdale Cur ve Eaton45th InglewoodBranson CrockerAldenScottKiplingMontereyBarr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-09-15 20:05 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Morningside FRRS 23271798\Maps\Fig F-1 Option 10 20% AEP.mxd User: EMA 10% ACE INUNDATION AND TOTAL FLOOD RISK REFINED COMBINATION OPTION, ~$5M COST FIGURE D-2 Imagery: Hennepin County, 2018 Inundation Depth (feet) < 0.1 feet 0.1 - 1 feet 1 - 3 feet 3 - 6 feet 6 - 9 feet 9 - 12 feet > 12 feet 2 3 4 1 - Lowest Risk 5 - Highest Risk No Risk Added Risk (0 home) Homes Removed from Risk (6 homes) !;N 0 175 350 Feet Note: Total Flood Risk accountsfor all storm events modeled, notthe risk for an individual storm. Total Flood Risk (154 Homes at Risk) Kojetin Park Open Space 5 OpenSpace 6 WeberField Park Weber Woods LynnFrance40th 42nd Morningside 44th Sunnyside Littel SidellGrimesNatchezOakdale Cur ve Eaton45th InglewoodBranson CrockerAldenScottKiplingMontereyBarr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-09-15 20:05 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Morningside FRRS 23271798\Maps\Fig F-1 Option 10 20% AEP.mxd User: EMA 4% ACE INUNDATION AND TOTAL FLOOD RISK REFINED COMBINATION OPTION, ~$5M COST FIGURE D-3 Imagery: Hennepin County, 2018 Inundation Depth (feet) < 0.1 feet 0.1 - 1 feet 1 - 3 feet 3 - 6 feet 6 - 9 feet 9 - 12 feet > 12 feet 2 3 4 1 - Lowest Risk 5 - Highest Risk No Risk Added Risk (0 home) Homes Removed from Risk (6 homes) !;N 0 175 350 Feet Note: Total Flood Risk accountsfor all storm events modeled, notthe risk for an individual storm. Total Flood Risk (154 Homes at Risk) Kojetin Park Open Space 5 OpenSpace 6 WeberField Park Weber Woods LynnFrance40th 42nd Morningside 44th Sunnyside Littel SidellGrimesNatchezOakdale Cur ve Eaton45th InglewoodBranson CrockerAldenScottKiplingMontereyBarr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-09-15 20:05 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Morningside FRRS 23271798\Maps\Fig F-1 Option 10 20% AEP.mxd User: EMA 2% ACE INUNDATION AND TOTAL FLOOD RISK REFINED COMBINATION OPTION, ~$5M COST FIGURE D-4 Imagery: Hennepin County, 2018 Inundation Depth (feet) < 0.1 feet 0.1 - 1 feet 1 - 3 feet 3 - 6 feet 6 - 9 feet 9 - 12 feet > 12 feet 2 3 4 1 - Lowest Risk 5 - Highest Risk No Risk Added Risk (0 home) Homes Removed from Risk (6 homes) !;N 0 175 350 Feet Note: Total Flood Risk accountsfor all storm events modeled, notthe risk for an individual storm. Total Flood Risk (154 Homes at Risk) Kojetin Park Open Space 5 OpenSpace 6 WeberField Park Weber Woods LynnFrance40th 42nd Morningside 44th Sunnyside Littel SidellGrimesNatchezOakdale Cur ve Eaton45th InglewoodBranson CrockerAldenScottKiplingMontereyBarr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-09-15 20:05 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Morningside FRRS 23271798\Maps\Fig F-1 Option 10 20% AEP.mxd User: EMA 1% ACE INUNDATION AND TOTAL FLOOD RISK REFINED COMBINATION OPTION, ~$5M COST FIGURE D-5 Imagery: Hennepin County, 2018 Inundation Depth (feet) < 0.1 feet 0.1 - 1 feet 1 - 3 feet 3 - 6 feet 6 - 9 feet 9 - 12 feet > 12 feet 2 3 4 1 - Lowest Risk 5 - Highest Risk No Risk Added Risk (0 home) Homes Removed from Risk (6 homes) !;N 0 175 350 Feet Note: Total Flood Risk accountsfor all storm events modeled, notthe risk for an individual storm. Total Flood Risk (154 Homes at Risk) Kojetin Park Open Space 5 OpenSpace 6 WeberField Park Weber Woods LynnFrance40th 42nd Morningside 44th Sunnyside Littel SidellGrimesNatchezOakdale Cur ve Eaton45th InglewoodBranson CrockerAldenScottKiplingMontereyBarr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2020-09-15 20:05 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Morningside FRRS 23271798\Maps\Fig F-1 Option 10 20% AEP.mxd User: EMA 0.2% ACE INUNDATION AND TOTAL FLOOD RISK REFINED COMBINATION OPTION, ~$5M COST FIGURE D-6 Imagery: Hennepin County, 2018 Inundation Depth (feet) < 0.1 feet 0.1 - 1 feet 1 - 3 feet 3 - 6 feet 6 - 9 feet 9 - 12 feet > 12 feet 2 3 4 1 - Lowest Risk 5 - Highest Risk No Risk Added Risk (0 home) Homes Removed from Risk (6 homes) !;N 0 175 350 Feet Note: Total Flood Risk accountsfor all storm events modeled, notthe risk for an individual storm. Total Flood Risk (154 Homes at Risk) $13,300; 54%$18,600; 35% $2,100; 4% $0; 0% $300; 2% $53,700; 67% $3,400; 14%$3,600; 5%$7,200; 28% Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China(Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS UserCommunity Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2021-01-18 16:24 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\Morningside FRRS 23271798\Maps\Fig D-7 Option 12 Zone Benefits.mxd User: EMA TOTAL FLOOD RISKREDUCTION AS ADOLLAR AMOUNT ANDAS A PERCENTAGE FIGURE D-7 0 175 350 Feet Primary Structures Annualized Damage Reduction, $ < $10,000 $10,000 - $20,000 $20,000 - $30,000 $30,000 - $40,000 $40,000 - $50,000 $50,000 - $60,000 $60,000 - $70,000 REFINED COMBINATIONOPTION, ~$5M COST P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Mitigation Alternatives Technical Memo\Jan2021 Memo\Morningside_Flood_Infrastructure_Technical_Memo_02032021.docx Attachment E Planning Level Opinion of Probable Construction Costs PREPARED BY: BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY SHEET:1 OF 5 BY:CDA DATE:8/27/2020 FEASIBILITY STUDY CHECKED BY:KJN2 DATE:12/3/2020 ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE PROJECT COST APPROVED BY:DATE: PROJECT:Morningside FRR Preliminary Engineering ISSUED:DATE: LOCATION:City of Edina ISSUED:DATE: PROJECT #:23/27-1798.00 ISSUED:DATE: OPINION OF COST - SUMMARY ISSUED:DATE: Engineer's Opinion of Probable Project Cost Morningside Flood Mitigation Feasibility Project REFINED COMBINATION OPTION at ~$15M Cat.ESTIMATED No.ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT COST ITEM COST General Mobilization/Demobilization (<10%)LS 1 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 Temporary Erosion Control LS 1 $70,000.00 $70,000.00 Flotation Silt Curtain LF 450 $11.00 $4,950.00 Excavate Excavation CY 69,000 $4.00 $276,000.00 Weber Pond Off Site Disposal of Excavated Material CY 69,000 $18.00 $1,242,000.00 Dewatering LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Excavate Tree 2", B&B Each 150 $500.00 $75,000.00 Weber Woods Clearing and Grubbing AC 5 $8,500.00 $42,500.00 Excavation CY 89,000 $4.00 $356,000.00 Off Site Disposal of Excavated Material CY 89,000 $18.00 $1,602,000.00 Lower Sport Excavation CY 27,000 $4.00 $108,000.00 Fieds in Park Off Site Disposal of Excavated Material CY 27,000 $18.00 $486,000.00 Turf Establishment (w/ Disc Anchored Mulch)AC 1.2 $3,000.00 $3,636.09 Erosion Control Blanket SY 3,610 $3.00 $10,830.00 Remove and Rebuild 3 baseball diamonds LS 1 $300,000.00 $300,000.00 Excavation CY 15,000 $4.00 $60,000.00 Off Site Disposal of Excavated Material CY 15,000 $18.00 $270,000.00 Turf Establishment (w/ Disc Anchored Mulch)AC 1.4 $3,000.00 $4,338.84 Erosion Control Blanket SY 2,220 $3.00 $6,660.00 Remove and Rebuild ice hockey rink area LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Swale Excavation CY 3,900 $4.00 $15,600.00 through Off Site Disposal of Excavated Material CY 3,900 $18.00 $70,200.00 Park Upland Native Vegetation AC 0.4 $5,000.00 $1,928.37 Erosion Control Blanket SY 1,870 $3.00 $5,610.00 Walking Trail LS 1 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 Avail Excavation CY 5,000 $4.00 $20,000.00 Academy Off Site Disposal of Excavated Material CY 5,000 $18.00 $90,000.00 Excavation Tree 2", B&B Each 25 $500.00 $12,500.00 Clearing and Grubbing AC 0.8 $8,500.00 $7,219.93 Upland Native Vegetation AC 0.8 $5,000.00 $4,247.02 24" RC Pipe Sewer (Furnish and Install) (12 - 13' depth)LF 400 $120.00 $48,000.00 Inglewood 36" RC Pipe Sewer (Furnish and Install) (8 - 13' depth)LF 1,000 $180.00 $180,000.00 Construct Drainage Structure SD-60 LF 30 $730.00 $21,900.00 Tie-In Storm Sewer Main to Manhole Each 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 Susan Excavation CY 20,000 $4.00 $80,000.00 Lindgren Off Site Disposal of Excavated Material CY 20,000 $18.00 $360,000.00 School Turf Establishment (w/ Disc Anchored Mulch)AC 2.5 $3,000.00 $7,575.76 Park Erosion Control Blanket SY 2,780 $3.00 $8,340.00 10' W x 4' H Box Culvert (Furnish and Install)LF 470 $650.00 $305,500.00 Open Space Excavation CY 29,000 $4.00 $116,000.00 Number 5 Off Site Disposal of Excavated Material CY 29,000 $18.00 $522,000.00 10' W x 4' H Box Culvert (Furnish and Install)LF 470 $650.00 $305,500.00 Dewatering LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Cost Benefit methods\Engineers Opinion of Probable Cost_20201203.xlsx 1 PREPARED BY: BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY SHEET:1 OF 5 BY:CDA DATE:8/27/2020 FEASIBILITY STUDY CHECKED BY:KJN2 DATE:12/3/2020 ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE PROJECT COST APPROVED BY:DATE: PROJECT:Morningside FRR Preliminary Engineering ISSUED:DATE: LOCATION:City of Edina ISSUED:DATE: PROJECT #:23/27-1798.00 ISSUED:DATE: OPINION OF COST - SUMMARY ISSUED:DATE: Engineer's Opinion of Probable Project Cost Morningside Flood Mitigation Feasibility Project REFINED COMBINATION OPTION at ~$15M Cat.ESTIMATED No.ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT COST ITEM COST New / Remove and Dispose of Existing Storm Sewer LF 4,580 $20.00 $91,600.00 Additional Remove and Dispose of Existing Manhole/Catch Basin Each 22 $850.00 $18,700.00 Pipe Capacity 24" RC Pipe Sewer (Furnish and Install) (12 - 13' depth)LF 728 $120.00 $87,360.00 36" RC Pipe Sewer (Furnish and Install) (8 - 13' depth)LF 710 $180.00 $127,800.00 48" RC Pipe Sewer (Furnish and Install) (15' depth)LF 368 $300.00 $110,400.00 60" RC Pipe Sewer (Furnish and Install) (8 - 10' depth)LF 840 $320.00 $268,800.00 60" RC Pipe Sewer (Furnish and Install) (10 - 16' depth)LF 2,630 $400.00 $1,052,000.00 Construct Drainage Structure SD-48 LF 434 $450.00 $195,300.00 Construct Drainage Structure SD-60 LF 56 $730.00 $40,880.00 Construct Drainage Structure SD-72 LF 14 $970.00 $13,580.00 Construct Drainage Structure SD-84 LF 224 $1,360.00 $304,640.00 Casting Assembly Each 52 $800.00 $41,600.00 Tie-In Storm Sewer Main to Manhole Each 9 $1,000.00 $9,000.00 Connect CB Leads to Constructed Storm Sewer Each 68 $700.00 $47,600.00 Pump System Opti CMAC Predictive Pumping Control System (Furnish and Install)Each 1 $85,000.00 $85,000.00 For Weber Pond 4,000 GPM Pumping Station (Includes Building Structure, Electric Supply, Control Panel)LS 1 $700,000.00 $700,000.00 Pumping Station Outlet Piping (Furnish and Install)LF 1,100 $40.00 $44,000.00 Pumping Station Inlet Suction Piping (Furnish and Install)LF 100 $40.00 $4,000.00 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $11,001,000.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY (30%)$3,300,000.00 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $14,301,000.00 ENGINEERING, DESIGN, PERMITTING, AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION (10%)$1,430,000.00 RESIDENTIAL/CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT EASEMENT $56,000.00 ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COST $15,787,000.00 -30%$11,051,000.00 50%$23,681,000.00 Notes 6 Estimate costs are to design, construct, and permit each alternative. The estimated costs do not include maintenance, monitoring or additional tasks following construction. 7 Furnish and Install pipe cost per lineal foot includes all trenching, bedding, backfilling, compaction, and disposal of excess materials 8 Estimate costs are reported to nearest thousand dollars. ESTIMATED ACCURACY RANGE 1 Limited Design Work Completed 2 Quantities Based on Design Work Completed. 3 Unit Prices Based on Information Available at This Time. 4 Minimal Soil and Field Investigations Completed. Costs do not included remediation of contaminated soils (if found). 5 This feasibility-level (Class 4, 10-15% design completion per ASTM E 2516-06) cost estimate is based on feasibility-level designs, alignments, quantities and unit prices. Costs will change with further design. Time value-of-money escalation costs are not included. A construction schedule is not available at this time. Contingency is an allowance for the net sum of costs that will be in the Final Total Project Cost at the time of the completion of design, but are not included at this level of project definition. The estimated accuracy range for the Total Project Cost as the project is defined is -30% to +50%. The accuracy range is based on professional judgement considering the level of design completed, the complexity of the project and the uncertainties in the project as scoped. The contingency and the accuracy range are not intended to include costs for future scope changes that are not part of the project as currently scoped or costs for risk contingency. Operation and Maintenance costs are not included. P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Cost Benefit methods\Engineers Opinion of Probable Cost_20201203.xlsx 2 PREPARED BY: BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY SHEET:1 OF 5 BY:CDA DATE:8/27/2020 FEASIBILITY STUDY CHECKED BY:KJN2 DATE:12/3/2020 ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE PROJECT COST APPROVED BY:DATE: PROJECT:Morningside FRR Preliminary Engineering ISSUED:DATE: LOCATION:City of Edina ISSUED:DATE: PROJECT #:23/27-1798.00 ISSUED:DATE: OPINION OF COST - SUMMARY ISSUED:DATE: Engineer's Opinion of Probable Project Cost Morningside Flood Mitigation Feasibility Project REFINED COMBINATION OPTION at ~$10M Cat.ESTIMATED No.ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT COST ITEM COST General Mobilization/Demobilization (<10%)LS 1 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 Temporary Erosion Control LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Flotation Silt Curtain LF 450 $11.00 $4,950.00 Excavate Excavation CY 49,000 $4.00 $196,000.00 Weber Pond Off Site Disposal of Excavated Material CY 49,000 $18.00 $882,000.00 Dewatering LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Excavate Tree 2", B&B Each 150 $500.00 $75,000.00 Weber Woods Clearing and Grubbing AC 5 $8,500.00 $42,500.00 Excavation CY 76,000 $4.00 $304,000.00 Off Site Disposal of Excavated Material CY 76,000 $18.00 $1,368,000.00 Lower Sport Excavation CY $4.00 $0.00 Fieds in Park Off Site Disposal of Excavated Material CY $18.00 $0.00 Turf Establishment (w/ Disc Anchored Mulch)AC $3,000.00 $0.00 Erosion Control Blanket SY $3.00 $0.00 Remove and Rebuild 3 baseball diamonds LS $300,000.00 $0.00 Excavation CY $4.00 $0.00 Off Site Disposal of Excavated Material CY $18.00 $0.00 Turf Establishment (w/ Disc Anchored Mulch)AC $3,000.00 $0.00 Erosion Control Blanket SY $3.00 $0.00 Remove and Rebuild ice hockey rink area LS $50,000.00 $0.00 Swale Excavation CY 3,900 $4.00 $15,600.00 through Off Site Disposal of Excavated Material CY 3,900 $18.00 $70,200.00 Park Upland Native Vegetation AC 0.4 $5,000.00 $1,928.37 Erosion Control Blanket SY 1,870 $3.00 $5,610.00 Walking Trail LS 1 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 Avail Excavation CY $4.00 $0.00 Academy Off Site Disposal of Excavated Material CY $18.00 $0.00 Excavation Tree 2", B&B Each $500.00 $0.00 Clearing and Grubbing AC $8,500.00 $0.00 Upland Native Vegetation AC $5,000.00 $0.00 24" RC Pipe Sewer (Furnish and Install) (12 - 13' depth)LF $120.00 $0.00 Inglewood 36" RC Pipe Sewer (Furnish and Install) (8 - 13' depth)LF $180.00 $0.00 Construct Drainage Structure SD-60 LF $730.00 $0.00 Tie-In Storm Sewer Main to Manhole Each $1,000.00 $0.00 Susan Excavation CY $4.00 $0.00 Lindgren Off Site Disposal of Excavated Material CY $18.00 $0.00 School Turf Establishment (w/ Disc Anchored Mulch)AC $3,000.00 $0.00 Park Erosion Control Blanket SY $3.00 $0.00 10' W x 4' H Box Culvert (Furnish and Install)LF $650.00 $0.00 Open Space Excavation CY 29,000 $4.00 $116,000.00 Number 5 Off Site Disposal of Excavated Material CY 29,000 $18.00 $522,000.00 10' W x 4' H Box Culvert (Furnish and Install)LF 470 $650.00 $305,500.00 Dewatering LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Cost Benefit methods\Engineers Opinion of Probable Cost_20201203.xlsx 3 PREPARED BY: BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY SHEET:1 OF 5 BY:CDA DATE:8/27/2020 FEASIBILITY STUDY CHECKED BY:KJN2 DATE:12/3/2020 ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE PROJECT COST APPROVED BY:DATE: PROJECT:Morningside FRR Preliminary Engineering ISSUED:DATE: LOCATION:City of Edina ISSUED:DATE: PROJECT #:23/27-1798.00 ISSUED:DATE: OPINION OF COST - SUMMARY ISSUED:DATE: Engineer's Opinion of Probable Project Cost Morningside Flood Mitigation Feasibility Project REFINED COMBINATION OPTION at ~$10M Cat.ESTIMATED No.ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT COST ITEM COST New / Remove and Dispose of Existing Storm Sewer LF 4,580 $20.00 $91,600.00 Additional Remove and Dispose of Existing Manhole/Catch Basin Each 22 $850.00 $18,700.00 Pipe Capacity 24" RC Pipe Sewer (Furnish and Install) (12 - 13' depth)LF 728 $120.00 $87,360.00 36" RC Pipe Sewer (Furnish and Install) (8 - 13' depth)LF 710 $180.00 $127,800.00 48" RC Pipe Sewer (Furnish and Install) (15' depth)LF 368 $300.00 $110,400.00 60" RC Pipe Sewer (Furnish and Install) (8 - 10' depth)LF 840 $320.00 $268,800.00 60" RC Pipe Sewer (Furnish and Install) (10 - 16' depth)LF 2,630 $400.00 $1,052,000.00 Construct Drainage Structure SD-48 LF 434 $450.00 $195,300.00 Construct Drainage Structure SD-60 LF 56 $730.00 $40,880.00 Construct Drainage Structure SD-72 LF 14 $970.00 $13,580.00 Construct Drainage Structure SD-84 LF 224 $1,360.00 $304,640.00 Casting Assembly Each 52 $800.00 $41,600.00 Tie-In Storm Sewer Main to Manhole Each 9 $1,000.00 $9,000.00 Connect CB Leads to Constructed Storm Sewer Each 68 $700.00 $47,600.00 Pump System Opti CMAC Predictive Pumping Control System (Furnish and Install)Each 1 $85,000.00 $85,000.00 For Weber Pond 4,000 GPM Pumping Station (Includes Building Structure, Electric Supply, Control Panel)LS 1 $700,000.00 $700,000.00 Pumping Station Outlet Piping (Furnish and Install)LF 1,100 $40.00 $44,000.00 Pumping Station Inlet Suction Piping (Furnish and Install)LF 100 $40.00 $4,000.00 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $7,809,000.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY (30%)$2,343,000.00 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $10,152,000.00 ENGINEERING, DESIGN, PERMITTING, AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION (10%)$1,015,000.00 RESIDENTIAL/CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT EASEMENT $56,000.00 ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COST $11,223,000.00 -30%$7,857,000.00 50%$16,835,000.00 Notes 6 Estimate costs are to design, construct, and permit each alternative. The estimated costs do not include maintenance, monitoring or additional tasks following construction. 7 Furnish and Install pipe cost per lineal foot includes all trenching, bedding, backfilling, compaction, and disposal of excess materials 8 Estimate costs are reported to nearest thousand dollars. ESTIMATED ACCURACY RANGE 1 Limited Design Work Completed 2 Quantities Based on Design Work Completed. 3 Unit Prices Based on Information Available at This Time. 4 Minimal Soil and Field Investigations Completed. Costs do not included remediation of contaminated soils (if found). 5 This feasibility-level (Class 4, 10-15% design completion per ASTM E 2516-06) cost estimate is based on feasibility-level designs, alignments, quantities and unit prices. Costs will change with further design. Time value-of-money escalation costs are not included. A construction schedule is not available at this time. Contingency is an allowance for the net sum of costs that will be in the Final Total Project Cost at the time of the completion of design, but are not included at this level of project definition. The estimated accuracy range for the Total Project Cost as the project is defined is -30% to +50%. The accuracy range is based on professional judgement considering the level of design completed, the complexity of the project and the uncertainties in the project as scoped. The contingency and the accuracy range are not intended to include costs for future scope changes that are not part of the project as currently scoped or costs for risk contingency. Operation and Maintenance costs are not included. P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Cost Benefit methods\Engineers Opinion of Probable Cost_20201203.xlsx 4 PREPARED BY: BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY SHEET:1 OF 5 BY:CDA DATE:8/27/2020 FEASIBILITY STUDY CHECKED BY:KJN2 DATE:12/3/2020 ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE PROJECT COST APPROVED BY:DATE: PROJECT:Morningside FRR Preliminary Engineering ISSUED:DATE: LOCATION:City of Edina ISSUED:DATE: PROJECT #:23/27-1798.00 ISSUED:DATE: OPINION OF COST - SUMMARY ISSUED:DATE: Engineer's Opinion of Probable Project Cost Morningside Flood Mitigation Feasibility Project REFINED COMBINATION OPTION at ~$5M Cat.ESTIMATED No.ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT COST ITEM COST General Mobilization/Demobilization (<10%)LS 1 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 Temporary Erosion Control LS 1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Flotation Silt Curtain LF 450 $11.00 $4,950.00 Excavate Excavation CY $4.00 $0.00 Weber Pond Off Site Disposal of Excavated Material CY $18.00 $0.00 Dewatering LS $50,000.00 $0.00 Excavate Tree 2", B&B Each 90 $500.00 $45,000.00 Weber Woods Clearing and Grubbing AC 3 $8,500.00 $25,500.00 Excavation CY 26,000 $4.00 $104,000.00 Off Site Disposal of Excavated Material CY 26,000 $18.00 $468,000.00 Lower Sport Excavation CY $4.00 $0.00 Fieds in Park Off Site Disposal of Excavated Material CY $18.00 $0.00 Turf Establishment (w/ Disc Anchored Mulch)AC $3,000.00 $0.00 Erosion Control Blanket SY $3.00 $0.00 Remove and Rebuild 3 baseball diamonds LS $300,000.00 $0.00 Excavation CY $4.00 $0.00 Off Site Disposal of Excavated Material CY $18.00 $0.00 Turf Establishment (w/ Disc Anchored Mulch)AC $3,000.00 $0.00 Erosion Control Blanket SY $3.00 $0.00 Remove and Rebuild ice hockey rink area LS $50,000.00 $0.00 Swale Excavation CY $4.00 $0.00 through Off Site Disposal of Excavated Material CY $18.00 $0.00 Park Upland Native Vegetation AC $5,000.00 $0.00 Erosion Control Blanket SY $3.00 $0.00 Walking Trail LS $7,000.00 $0.00 Avail Excavation CY $4.00 $0.00 Academy Off Site Disposal of Excavated Material CY $18.00 $0.00 Excavation Tree 2", B&B Each $500.00 $0.00 Clearing and Grubbing AC $8,500.00 $0.00 Upland Native Vegetation AC $5,000.00 $0.00 24" RC Pipe Sewer (Furnish and Install) (12 - 13' depth)LF $120.00 $0.00 Inglewood 36" RC Pipe Sewer (Furnish and Install) (8 - 13' depth)LF $180.00 $0.00 Construct Drainage Structure SD-60 LF $730.00 $0.00 Tie-In Storm Sewer Main to Manhole Each $1,000.00 $0.00 Susan Excavation CY $4.00 $0.00 Lindgren Off Site Disposal of Excavated Material CY $18.00 $0.00 School Turf Establishment (w/ Disc Anchored Mulch)AC $3,000.00 $0.00 Park Erosion Control Blanket SY $3.00 $0.00 10' W x 4' H Box Culvert (Furnish and Install)LF $650.00 $0.00 Open Space Excavation CY 29,000 $4.00 $116,000.00 Number 5 Off Site Disposal of Excavated Material CY 29,000 $18.00 $522,000.00 10' W x 4' H Box Culvert (Furnish and Install)LF 0 $650.00 $0.00 Dewatering LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Cost Benefit methods\Engineers Opinion of Probable Cost_20201203.xlsx 5 PREPARED BY: BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY SHEET:1 OF 5 BY:CDA DATE:8/27/2020 FEASIBILITY STUDY CHECKED BY:KJN2 DATE:12/3/2020 ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE PROJECT COST APPROVED BY:DATE: PROJECT:Morningside FRR Preliminary Engineering ISSUED:DATE: LOCATION:City of Edina ISSUED:DATE: PROJECT #:23/27-1798.00 ISSUED:DATE: OPINION OF COST - SUMMARY ISSUED:DATE: Engineer's Opinion of Probable Project Cost Morningside Flood Mitigation Feasibility Project REFINED COMBINATION OPTION at ~$5M Cat.ESTIMATED No.ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT COST ITEM COST New / Remove and Dispose of Existing Storm Sewer LF 3,000 $20.00 $60,000.00 Additional Remove and Dispose of Existing Manhole/Catch Basin Each 22 $850.00 $18,700.00 Pipe Capacity 24" RC Pipe Sewer (Furnish and Install) (12 - 13' depth)LF 728 $120.00 $87,360.00 36" RC Pipe Sewer (Furnish and Install) (8 - 13' depth)LF 330 $180.00 $59,400.00 48" RC Pipe Sewer (Furnish and Install) (15' depth)LF 0 $300.00 $0.00 60" RC Pipe Sewer (Furnish and Install) (8 - 10' depth)LF 0 $320.00 $0.00 60" RC Pipe Sewer (Furnish and Install) (10 - 16' depth)LF 2,630 $400.00 $1,052,000.00 Construct Drainage Structure SD-48 LF 434 $450.00 $195,300.00 Construct Drainage Structure SD-60 LF 56 $730.00 $40,880.00 Construct Drainage Structure SD-72 LF 14 $970.00 $13,580.00 Construct Drainage Structure SD-84 LF 224 $1,360.00 $304,640.00 Casting Assembly Each 52 $800.00 $41,600.00 Tie-In Storm Sewer Main to Manhole Each 9 $1,000.00 $9,000.00 Connect CB Leads to Constructed Storm Sewer Each 68 $700.00 $47,600.00 Pump System Opti CMAC Predictive Pumping Control System (Furnish and Install)Each $85,000.00 $0.00 For Weber Pond 4,000 GPM Pumping Station (Includes Building Structure, Electric Supply, Control Panel)LS $700,000.00 $0.00 Pumping Station Outlet Piping (Furnish and Install)LF $40.00 $0.00 Pumping Station Inlet Suction Piping (Furnish and Install)LF $40.00 $0.00 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $3,796,000.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY (30%)$1,139,000.00 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $4,935,000.00 ENGINEERING, DESIGN, PERMITTING, AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION (10%)$494,000.00 RESIDENTIAL/CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT EASEMENT $56,000.00 ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COST $5,485,000.00 -30%$3,840,000.00 50%$8,228,000.00 Notes 6 Estimate costs are to design, construct, and permit each alternative. The estimated costs do not include maintenance, monitoring or additional tasks following construction. 7 Furnish and Install pipe cost per lineal foot includes all trenching, bedding, backfilling, compaction, and disposal of excess materials 8 Estimate costs are reported to nearest thousand dollars. ESTIMATED ACCURACY RANGE 1 Limited Design Work Completed 2 Quantities Based on Design Work Completed. 3 Unit Prices Based on Information Available at This Time. 4 Minimal Soil and Field Investigations Completed. Costs do not included remediation of contaminated soils (if found). 5 This feasibility-level (Class 4, 10-15% design completion per ASTM E 2516-06) cost estimate is based on feasibility-level designs, alignments, quantities and unit prices. Costs will change with further design. Time value-of-money escalation costs are not included. A construction schedule is not available at this time. Contingency is an allowance for the net sum of costs that will be in the Final Total Project Cost at the time of the completion of design, but are not included at this level of project definition. The estimated accuracy range for the Total Project Cost as the project is defined is -30% to +50%. The accuracy range is based on professional judgement considering the level of design completed, the complexity of the project and the uncertainties in the project as scoped. The contingency and the accuracy range are not intended to include costs for future scope changes that are not part of the project as currently scoped or costs for risk contingency. Operation and Maintenance costs are not included. P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271798 Morningside FRR Prelim Eng & E\WorkFiles\Cost Benefit methods\Engineers Opinion of Probable Cost_20201203.xlsx 6 City of Edina 2019-203 CIP Change Request Form 4/21/2016 4:37 PM Project Name Project Contact Project Number Department Head Project in 3ULRU CIP? Department Project Description (what and where?) – include enough detail that a person who is unfamiliar with the project before reading this can understand what we are proposing. Strategic Justification (why?) – describe why the City should do this project. Usually the City’s top priorities are set by the Council in documents like Vision (GLQD, Comp Plan, or City Work Plan. City of Edina 2019-203 CIP Change Request Form 4/21/2016 4:37 PM Environmental considerations – list environmental effects to consider. Are "greener" alternatives being considered? Already Future Total Expenditures (describe) Spent 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Years Project 1 2 3 4 5 Total Expenditures Funding Sources: List all known funding. If there is none identified yet, specify "Construction Fund". 1 2 3 4 5 6 Total Funding Sources Project Costs (how much?) and Financing (how?) - include everything. Expenditures might include construction, consultants, hardware, software, etc. Funding might include donations, state grants, special assessments, etc. Comments on costs and financing, if necessary. Are there any ongoing costs/benefits to consider? Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project City Council Meeting September 21, 2021 Ross Bintner –Engineering Services Manager 1.Commitments Made 2.Public Engagement 3.Weber Park Design 4.Lynn/Kipling Design 5.Commitments Met / Modified Recommendations 6.Next Steps and Discussion EdinaMN.gov 2 Outline Staff & Consultants •Ross Bintner -Engineering Services Manager •Fred Rozumalski -Landscape Architect, Barr Engineering •Jessica Wilson -Water Resources Coordinator •Tom Swenson -Assistant Director Parks •Perry Vetter –Parks Director •No property acquisition •Restore and improve natural resource value •Reinvest in park where impacts occur Cost •$10M Capital •$2M Professional service Alignment with Council Strategy Service •Flood Exposure Reductions •Balance Neighborhood Benefits Process / Engagement •Scope of public input Impacts/Opportunities •Tree Removal / Increase flood storage in Weber woods •41st Street right of way Commitments Made EdinaMN.gov 3 c c c c EdinaMN.gov 4 4/20/21 Existing (North) EdinaMN.gov 5 4/20/21 $10M (North) Project design is well aligned with Council goals Strong Foundation: 1.Incorporate financial, societal, and environmental costs into decision-making processes. 2.Incorporate lifecycle and maintenance costs and climate adaptation design practices to allow more informed decision making. 3.Provide funding to maintain and replace City facilities, assets and equipment in a manner that avoids deferred maintenance, prevents emergency repair and replaces assets at the most cost effective time. 4.Design and build for resiliency in the infrastructure that reduces flooded structures, improves water quality EdinaMN.gov 6 Strategic Alignment - Council Infrastructure Strategy Project engagement was conducted in alignment with Council goals Better Together: Conduct clear and meaningful community engagement where: 1.The decision to be made and decision-making process is clearly defined, 2.Individuals understand how and when they can participate, 3.The City communicates what feedback is used and why, 4.Inclusive engagement methods provide a variety of ways for the public to participate in the decision-making process and ensure all voices are heard. EdinaMN.gov 7 Strategic Alignment - Council Engagement Strategy •April 2021 public participation plan approved. Added on to process started in May 2020. •Goal: To obtain public feedback on analysis, alternatives and/or decisions. •Promise: We will keep the public informed, listen to and acknowledge concerns and aspirations, and provide feedback on how public input influenced the decision. •Experts in engineering, water and natural resources management, flood risk, parks and recreation, and landscape architecture put together our best version of a design. •Staff share the design with residents and seek their input. Residents are experts in sense of place, neighborhood feel, public attitudes, community values, desired amenities, and tax burden. •Staff share the design with City Council and describe how resident input was used or not used, describe tradeoffs/constraints/opportunities, and make recommendations. EdinaMN.gov 8 Engagement –Promise to the Public and Process General •Clarify how this looks. •Clarify the impact to specific areas. •Talk to more people, extend the comment period. •Are you still accommodating how I use the park and woods? Flood Infrastructure •Does the flood benefit still accrue? •Park swale cuts open space in two, making it smaller; keep large open space. Natural Resources – Park, Woods, Lynn/Kipling •Add native plant restoration areas to park, or not? •Will this project be a ‘loss’ for wildlife and dog-walking? •Clarify the impact to specific trees, explain the approach to trees and natural area restoration. Weber Park and Woods •Why is this so focused on the park? •Do/Don’t add other amenities – pool, skate park, soccer, playground, disk golf, etc. •Do/Don’t add fence in Woods. •Don’t add outfield fence at baseball/softball fields. •Leave more open space [or] replace more trees? •Reconfigure hockey rink, or not? •Improve turf and open field areas. EdinaMN.gov 9 Engagement -What we’ve heard Used •Open ice skate rink size increased •Trees moved to edges •More open, irrigated field for unprogrammed play in center of park •Picnic/seating area, covered pavilion •The size and placement of new natural planting areas is a detail often decided later in the design process EdinaMN.gov 10 Engagement –How input was used or not used Not Used •Amenities not added: Skate park, pool/splash pad, volleyball, disk golf •Swale placement between baseball/softball fields remains part of design •Outfield fencing at baseball/softball fields remains part of design •New rink placement along Grimes remains part of design 11 Weber Park 30% Design Lynn/Kipling Flood Inundation Area Lynn/Kipling Inundation Area EdinaMN.gov 12 30% DesignLynn Ave.Kipling Ave. 13 Weber Park 30% Design 14 Weber Pond 30% Design 15 Weber Pond 30% DesignFrance Ave. EdinaMN.gov 16 EdinaMN.gov 17 Weber Park Boardwalk Material Weber Park EdinaMN.gov 18 Oak Savana Restoration 19 Weber Pond France Ave.42nd St. EdinaMN.gov 20 Weber Park Native Pond Edge Habitat 21 30% Design 42nd St.Grimes Ave.Weber Park EdinaMN.gov 22 EdinaMN.gov 23 EdinaMN.gov 24 Weber Park Park Structure for Seating EdinaMN.gov 25 Weber Park Nature Play •No property acquisition •Restore and improve natural resource value •Reinvest in park where impacts occur Cost •$2M Professional service Alignment to Council Strategy Service •Flood Exposure Reductions •Balance Neighborhood Benefits Process / Engagement •Scope of public input Impacts/Opportunities •Tree Removal / Increase flood storage in Weber woods •41st Street right of way Commitments Made / Met EdinaMN.gov 26 Budget •$400K/1.204M spent in design to date •Contaminated dredge material, construction materials cost escalation and labor markets are putting pressure on $10M capital budget estimate, design team working to value-engineer •Split project means pipe cost estimates are at 10% level of design, with overlap and savings from typical neighborhood recon, this and split in projects will make total project cost harder to track. 41st Street box culvert impacts •Acknowledge swale service to Grimes low point, benefit to park shelter and Avail •A box culvert along the 41st right-of-way will be used only if a 42nd Street Pipe cannot be feasibly upsized to accommodate additional flood flow. Swale alignment through park •Revised recommended alignment has natural resource and park space benefit, but maximum open area size tradeoff Modified Recommendation EdinaMN.gov 27 EdinaMN.gov 28 Images of existing conditions 2D flood model demonstrating overflow path impacting school and park shelter and need for park swale EdinaMN.gov 29 Schedule / Next Steps •2018: Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan •Spring 2020: Flood Risk Reduction Strategy Approval •2020-21: Morningside Flood Infrastructure Preliminary Engineering and engagement •2021-22: Design, Bid •2022: Build •2022: Phase 1 construction Morningside (Areas D&E) 2023: Phase 2 Construction Morningside (Area C) EdinaMN.gov 30 Schedule / Next Steps •Q3 2021 (late) Public comment period ends, 30-60% design work, regulatory permits •Q4 2021; Regulatory permits, final design work •Q1 2022 Award tree clearing contract •Q2 2022 (early) Award grading/park project •Q2 2022 (early) Award neighborhood recon project (includes majority of pipe project) •Q2 2022 (mid) Construction Starts Discussion / Questions EdinaMN.gov 31 Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:Resolution 2021-79: Approving Modification No. 4 to Southdale 2 TIF District Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2021-79 adopting a modification to the tax increment financing plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District. INTRODUCTION: This item pertains to a budget modification to the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District. A public hearing to collect input was conducted on September 9, 2021. Input from Hennepin County, Edina Public Schools and Richfield Public Schools was also solicited in accordance with Minnesota Statute. Staff recommends that Resolution No. 2021-79 be approved. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution 2021-79 TIF Plan with Modification No. 4 Better Together Public Hearing Comment Report 9-13-21 Noon Staff Presentation, Sept 9 CITY OF EDINA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA Councilmember ______________________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 2021-79 RESOLUTION ADOPTING A MODIFICATION TO THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR THE SOUTHDALE 2 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The Board of Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA") have heretofore established the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area (the "Project Area") and adopted a Redevelopment Plan therefor and established the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District (the “District”) and adopted the Tax Increment Financing Plan (the “TIF Plan”) therefor. It has been proposed that the City approve Modification #4 to the TIF Plan (the “Modification”) pursuant to and in conformity with applicable law, including Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 and Sections 469.174 to 469.1794, all inclusive, as amended, (the "Act") and Minnesota Session Laws 2014, Chapter 308, Article 6, Section 8, as amended by Minnesota Session Laws 2017, First Special Session Chapter 1, Article 6, Sections 11 and 16, and Minnesota Session Laws 2019, First Special Session Chapter 6, Article 7, Section 3 (the "Special TIF Housing Legislation") all as reflected in the Modification, and presented for the Council's consideration. 1.02. The substantive change within the Modification includes increasing the estimate of budgeted expenditures for project costs that will be paid or financed using District funds. 1.03. The HRA and City have investigated the facts relating to the Modification and have caused the Modification to be prepared. 1.04. The HRA and City have performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the adoption and approval of the proposed Modification, including, but not limited to, notification of Hennepin County and Independent School Districts No. 273 and No. 280 having taxing jurisdiction over the property within the District, a review of and written comment on the Modification by the City Planning Commission, adoption of the Modification by the HRA on August 26, 2021, and the holding of a public hearing upon published notice as required by law. 1.05. The City is not modifying the boundaries of the Project Area. 1.06. The City is not modifying the boundaries nor term of the District. Resolution 2021-79 Page 2 Section 2. Findings for the Modification. 2.01. The Council hereby reaffirms the original findings for the District, namely that when the District was established it is in the public interest and is an “economic development district” under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. 12 of the Act. 2.02. In addition, the City makes the following findings: (a) The Modification conforms to the general plan for development or redevelopment of the City as a whole. The reason for supporting this finding is that the Modification will generally complement and serve to implement policies adopted in the City's comprehensive plan. (b) The Modification will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the Project Area by private enterprise. The reason for supporting this finding is that the development activities are necessary so that development and redevelopment by private enterprise can occur within the Project Area. (c) The development and redevelopment efforts requiring assistance, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and therefor the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. Section 3. Public Purpose. 3.01. The adoption of the Modification conforms in all respects to the requirement of the Act and will help fulfill a need to develop an area of the City which is already built up, to provide housing opportunities, to improve the tax based and to improve the general economy of the State and thereby serves a public purpose. Section 4. Approval and Adoption of the Modification; Filing. 4.01. The Modification, as presented to the Council on this date, including without limitation the findings and statements of objectives contained therein, are hereby approved, ratified, established, and adopted and shall be placed on file in the office of the HRA Executive Director. 4.02. The staff of the City, the City's advisors and legal counsel are authorized and directed to proceed with the implementation of the Modification and to negotiate, draft, prepare and present to this Council for its consideration all further plans, resolutions, documents and contracts necessary for this purpose. 4.03 The HRA Executive Director is authorized and directed to file a copy of the Modification with the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Revenue, the Office of the State Auditor and Hennepin County Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.175, Subd. 4a. Resolution 2021-79 Page 3 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council member ______________________, and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: _________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ and the following voted against the same: _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ Dated: September 21, 2021 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor (Seal) Resolution 2021-79 Page 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of September 21, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of________________________, 2021. _______________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Adoption Date: April 17, 2012 Modification #1: April 5, 2016 Modification #2: November 20, 2018 Modification #3: December 17, 2019 Modification #4: September 9, 2021 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota MODIFICATION #4 to the Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Plan Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District Located in Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area (an economic development district) BUILDING COMMUNITIES. IT’S WHAT WE DO. Prepared by: Ehlers 3060 Centre Pointe Drive Roseville, Minnesota 55113 TABLE OF CONTENTS Modification #4 to the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District 1 FOREWORD 1 STATUTORY AUTHORITY 1 STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES 1 ESTIMATED SOURCES OF REVENUE/BONDS TO BE ISSUED 2 USES OF FUNDS 3 Appendix A: Southdale 2 TIF Plan – through Modification #3 as of December 17, 2019 4 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District 1 Modification #4 to the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District FOREWORD The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA"), the City of Edina (the "City"), staff and consultants have prepared the following information to expedite a modification to the Tax Increment Financing Plan (the “TIF Plan”) of the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District (the "District"), an economic development tax increment financing district, located in Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area (the “Project Area”). The proposed modification amends only sections 2-9 and 2-10 of the TIF Plan. This modification does not affect the boundaries of the District, the land use of parcels located within the District, nor the project for which the District was originally created. STATUTORY AUTHORITY Within the City, there exist areas where public involvement is necessary to cause development or redevelopment to occur. To this end, the HRA and City have certain statutory powers pursuant to Minnesota Statutes ("M.S."), Sections 469.001 - 469.047, inclusive, as amended, M.S., Sections 469.174 to 469.1794, inclusive, as amended (the "Tax Increment Financing Act" or "TIF Act"), and Minnesota Session Laws 2014, Chapter 308, Article 6, Section 8, inclusive, as amended (the “Special TIF Housing Legislation”) to assist in financing public costs related to this project. This section contains Modification #4 to the TIF Plan for the District (the “Modification”). This Modification is subject to M.S. Section 469.175, subdivision 4. The substantive changes include increasing the estimate of the cost of the project, including administrative expenses, that will be paid or financed with tax increment from the District. Other relevant information is contained in the Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and the existing TIF Plan herein as Appendix A. STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES The District currently consists of 255 parcels of land and adjacent roads and internal rights-of-way and is scheduled to expire at the close of 2021. The Modification is being created to increase the estimated project costs to be financed or paid from tax increment collected from the District until its expiration to include additional affordable housing project costs as enabled by the Special Housing TIF Legislation. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2 The Modification is a continuation of the TIF Plan and is expected to achieve many of the objectives outlined in the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area. The activities contemplated in the Modification do not preclude the undertaking of other qualified development or redevelopment activities. These activities are anticipated to occur over the life of the Project Area and the District. There are no additional anticipated fiscal impacts associated with the Modification. A copy of the proposed Modification was furnished to Hennepin County and Independent School Districts 273 and 280 for comment prior to formal approval. ESTIMATED SOURCES OF REVENUE/BONDS TO BE ISSUED As modified September 9, 2021 Subsection 2-9 of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District shall be amended as follows: SOURCES OF FUNDS December 17, 2019 September 9, 2021 Tax Increment $30,620,000 $31,950,000 Interest 500,000 1,400,000 Land Sale Proceeds/Lease Revenue - 598,409 TOTAL $31,120,000 $33,948,409 The costs outlined in the Uses of Funds will be financed primarily through the annual collection of tax increments. Although not anticipated, the HRA and/or the City reserves the right to incur bonds or other indebtedness as a result of the TIF Plan. Any refunding amounts will be deemed a budgeted cost without a formal TIF Plan modification. This provision does not obligate the HRA or the City to incur debt. The HRA and or the City will issue bonds or incur other debt only upon the determination that such action is in the best interest of the HRA. The HRA and or the City may issue bonds (as defined in the TIF Act) secured in whole or in part with tax increments from the District in a maximum principal amount of $32,448,409. Such bonds may be in the form of pay-as- you-go notes, revenue bonds or notes, general obligation bonds, or interfund loans. This estimate of total bonded indebtedness is a cumulative statement of authority under this TIF Plan as of the date of approval. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District 3 USES OF FUNDS As modified September 9, 2021 Subsection 2-10 of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District shall be amended as follows: The September 9, 2021 amendment contains the cumulative estimated project costs, including the previously identified costs from the original and previous amendments. The total project cost, including financing costs (interest) listed in the table below does not exceed the total projected tax increments for the District as shown in the Sources of Revenue section. USES OF TAX INCREMENT FUNDS December 17, 2019 September 9, 2021 Land/Building Acquisition $4,000,000 $4,000,000 Site Improvements/Preparation 2,274,296 2,948,409 Utilities - 1,700,000 Other Qualifying Improvements 5,000,000 6,000,000 Affordable Housing 15,167,783 16,700,000 Administrative Costs (up to 10%) 1,100,000 1,100,000 PROJECT COSTS TOTAL $27,542,079 $32,448,409 Interest 3,577,921 1,500,000 PROJECT AND INTEREST COSTS TOTAL $31,120,000 $33,948,409 Estimated capital and administrative costs listed above associated with the District are subject to change among categories without further modification to this TIF Plan. The cost of all activities to be considered for tax increment financing will not exceed, without formal modification, the budget above pursuant to the applicable statutory requirements. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.1763, Subdivision 2(d) and the Special Housing TIF Legislation, the HRA and City may expend funds for qualified housing activities outside of the District boundaries. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District 4 Appendix A: Southdale 2 TIF Plan – through Modification #3 as of December 17, 2019 MODIFICATION TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area -AND - MODIFICATION TO THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District (an economic development district) Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota Adopted: April 17, 2012 Modification #1: April 5, 2016 Modification #2: November 20, 2018 Modification #3: December 17, 2019 Table of Contents (for reference purposes only) Section 1 - Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area............................1-1 Foreword..............................................................1-1 Section 1 - Municipal Action Taken.............................................1-1 Section 2 - Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District............................2-1 Subsection 2-1.Foreword...............................................2-1 Subsection 2-2.Statutory Authority........................................2-1 Subsection 2-3.Statement of Objectives....................................2-1 Subsection 2-4.Redevelopment Plan Overview...............................2-2 Subsection 2-5.Description of Property in the District and Property to be Acquired...2-3 Subsection 2-6.Classification of the District.................................2-3 Subsection 2-7.Duration and First Year of Tax Increment of the District............2-4 Subsection 2-8.Original Tax Capacity, Tax Rate and Estimated Captured Net Tax Capacity Value/Increment and Notification of Prior Planned Improvements................2-4 Subsection 2-9.Sources of Revenue/Bonds to be Issued.......................2-6 Subsection 2-10.Uses of Funds...........................................2-7 Subsection 2-11.Fiscal Disparities Election...................................2-9 Subsection 2-12.Business Subsidies.......................................2-9 Subsection 2-13.County Road Costs......................................2-10 Subsection 2-14.Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions.................2-10 Subsection 2-15.Supporting Documentation.................................2-14 Subsection 2-16.Definition of Tax Increment Revenues........................2-14 Subsection 2-17.Modifications to the District.................................2-14 Subsection 2-18.Administrative Expenses..................................2-15 Subsection 2-19.Limitation of Increment....................................2-16 Subsection 2-20.Use of Tax Increment.....................................2-16 Subsection 2-21.Excess Increments.......................................2-17 Subsection 2-22.Requirements for Agreements with the Developer...............2-17 Subsection 2-23.Assessment Agreements..................................2-18 Subsection 2-24.Administration of the District................................2-18 Subsection 2-25.Annual Disclosure Requirements............................2-18 Subsection 2-26.Reasonable Expectations..................................2-18 Subsection 2-27.Other Limitations on the Use of Tax Increment.................2-18 Subsection 2-28.Summary..............................................2-19 Appendix A Project Description......................................................A-1 Appendix B Maps of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and the District...........B-1 Appendix C Description of Property to be Included in the District.............................C-1 Appendix D Estimated Cash Flow for the District.........................................D-1 Appendix E Minnesota Business Assistance Form........................................E-1 Appendix F Findings Including But/For Qualifications.....................................F-1 Appendix G Prior Improvements......................................................G-1 Appendix H Special Legislation......................................................H-1 Appendix I Housing Qualifications....................................................I-1 Section 1 - Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Foreword The following text represents a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. This modification represents a continuation of the goals and objectives set forth in the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. Because the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District (the “District”) is located within the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, the modification to the District must be listed in the Redevelopment Plan. Therefore, the following bold-faced text represents a Modification to Section 1 of the Redevelopment Plan. Section 1 - Municipal Action Taken Based upon the statutory authority described in the Redevelopment Plan attached hereto, the public purpose findings by the City Council and for the purpose of fulfilling the City’s development objects as set forth in the Redevelopment Plan, the City Council has created, established and designated the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan pursuant to and in accordance with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.001 to 469.047. The original and amended Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan documents and amendments have designated the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan as a redevelopment project and also a tax increment financing plan for tax increment districts created prior to 1988. The Centennial Lakes Tax Increment Financing District was created in 1988 pursuant to Tax Increment Financing Plan 88-1, which was subsequently renamed the Centennial Lakes Tax Increment District and referred to by Hennepin County as District #1203 and #1249. For purposes of clarification, this modification will refer to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.002. The following municipal action has been taken with regard to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan: September 29, 1977: The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina (the “HRA”) approved the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan. October 5, 1981: The Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan was amended to identify project costs and bonded indebtedness incurred to finance those costs. May 6, 1985: The HRA and the City approved an amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan which includes the establishment of an interest reduction program and enlarges the project area to include the “1985 Project Area.” August 19, 1985: The HRA and the City approve d the First Amendment to the 1985 Amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan to enlarge the 1985 Project Area and to authorize the issuance of additional bonds to acquire land within the enlarged 1985 Project Area. 1987: The HRA and City approved the 1987 Amendments to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan to enlarge the project area to include the 1987 Project Area. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area 1-1 1988: The HRA and City approved the 1988 Amendments to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan that provide an Interest Reduction Program in the amount of $2,500,000 to assist in the financing and construction of housing units, and authorizes the HRA and City to incur bonded indebtedness. February 21, 2012: The HRA and City expand the Southeast Edina Project Area as can be seen in Appendix A. April 17, 2012: The HRA and City establish the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District. February 18, 2014: The HRA and City establish the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District. March 2, 2016: The HRA and City establish the Grandview 2 Tax Increment Financing District. April 5, 2016: The HRA and City modify the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District and establishing the 66 West Tax Increment Financing District. June 20, 2017: The HRA and City establish the 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District. October 16, 2018: The HRA and City establish the 44th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District. November 20, 2018: The HRA and City modify the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District to increase the TIF Budget and enable special legislation pooling authority for affordable housing. November 20, 2018: The HRA and City establish the West 76th Street Tax Increment Financing District. March 19, 2019: The HRA and City establish the 72nd and France Tax Increment Financing District. (AS MODIFIED DECEMBER 17, 2019) December 17, 2019: The HRA and City modify the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District to designate additional property to be acquired and establish the Amundson Avenue Tax Increment Financing District For further information, a review of the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area is recommended. It is available from the HRA Executive Director at the City of Edina. Other relevant information is contained in the Tax Increment Financing Plans for the Tax Increment Financing Districts located within the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area 1-2 Section 2 - Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District Subsection 2-1.Foreword The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA"), the City of Edina (the "City"), staff and consultants have prepared the following information to expedite the establishment of the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District (the "District"), an economic development tax increment financing district, located in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area (the "Project Area"). Subsection 2-2.Statutory Authority Within the City, there exist areas where public involvement is necessary to cause development or redevelopment to occur. To this end, the HRA and City have certain statutory powers pursuant to Minnesota Statutes ("M.S."), Sections 469.001 to 469.047, inclusive, as amended, and M.S., Sections 469.174 to 469.1799, inclusive, as amended (the "Tax Increment Financing Act" or "TIF Act"), to assist in financing public costs related to this project. This District is being created pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 4c(d). (AS MODIFIED NOVEMBER 20, 2018) This District is being modified to reflect Minnesota Session Laws 2017, Chapter 1, HF No. 1, Article 6, Sec. 11 and Sec. 16. (AS MODIFIED DECEMBER 17, 2019) This District is being modified to reflect Minnesota Session Laws 2019, First Special Session Chapter 6, Article 7, Sec. 3 (the “Special TIF Housing Legislation”). This section contains the Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF Plan") for the District. Other relevant information is contained in the Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. Subsection 2-3.Statement of Objectives The District currently consists of 300 parcels of land and adjacent and internal rights-of-way. The District is being created to facilitate renovations to the common areas of Southdale Mall in the City. Please see Appendix A for further District information. The HRA and City are considering entering into a redevelopment agreement that would designate Southdale Limited Partnership as the developer. This TIF Plan is expected to achieve many of the objectives outlined in the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. The activities contemplated in the Modification to the Redevelopment Plan and the TIF Plan do not preclude the undertaking of other qualified development or redevelopment activities. These activities are anticipated to occur over the life of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and the District. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-1 (AS MODIFIED APRIL 5, 2016) The District is being modified in order to remove one parcel and to authorize pooling dollars for affordable housing purposes pursuant to M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 2(d). Because the current net tax capacity of the parcel is lower than the frozen net tax capacity, the modification to the District must go through the entire public hearing process pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 4. (AS MODIFIED NOVEMBER 20, 2018) The District is being modified to increase the estimated affordable housing project costs to be financed by tax increment from the District as enabled by Minnesota Session Laws 2017, Chapter 1, HF No. 1, Article 6, Sec. 11 and Sec. 16. The Modification will allow the HRA and City to “treat expenditures from the District for a housing project of a district established under this section as expenditures qualifying under Minnesota Statues, Section 469.1763, Subdivision 2, paragraph (d): (1) without regard to whether the housing meets the requirement of a qualified building under Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code; and (2) may increase by an additional 25 percentage points the permitted amount of expenditures for activities located outside the geographic area of the district permitted under that section.” (AS MODIFIED DECEMBER 17, 2019) The District is being modified to designate additional property to be acquired by the HRA or City for affordable housing purposes under provisions of the TIF Act and Special TIF Housing Legislation as further described in the TIF Plan. Subsection 2-4.Redevelopment Plan Overview 1.Property to be Acquired - Selected property located within the District may be acquired by the HRA or City and is further described in this TIF Plan. 2.Relocation - Relocation services, to the extent required by law, are available pursuant to M.S., Chapter 117 and other relevant state and federal laws. 3.Upon approval of a developer's plan relating to the project and completion of the necessary legal requirements, the HRA or City may sell to a developer selected properties that it may acquire within the District or may lease land or facilities to a developer. 4.The HRA or City may perform or provide for some or all necessary acquisition, construction, relocation, demolition, and required utilities and public street work within the District. 5.The City proposes both public and private infrastructure within the District. The proposed improvements to private property within the District will be for a renovation to a retail mall, and there will be continued operation of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area after the capital improvements within the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area have been completed. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-2 Subsection 2-5.Description of Property in the District and Property to be Acquired The District encompasses all property and adjacent rights-of-way and abutting roadways identified by the parcels listed in Appendix C of this TIF Plan. Please also see the map in Appendix B for further information on the location of the District. The City currently owns parcels to be included in the District and intends to acquire land easements and/or additional property within the District. The HRA and City are authorized to use tax increments to acquire any parcel listed in Appendix C of this TIF Plan. (AS MODIFIED NOVEMBER 20, 2018) The HRA or City authorizes the use of tax increments to acquire additional property currently identified as 4100 76th Street West. PID# 31-028-24-41-0010. (AS MODIFIED DECEMBER 17, 2019) The HRA or City authorizes the use of tax increments to acquire additional property including supporting interior and adjacent street, trail or utility rights of way currently identified as: 4040 70th Street West. PID# 30-028-24-44-0004 7075 Amundson Avenue. PID# 08-116-21-11-0009 7079 Amundson Avenue. PID# 08-116-21-11-0021 Subsection 2-6.Classification of the District The District is an economic development district as defined in M.S. 469.174, Subd. 12, as modified by M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 4c(d). In order to create an economic development district under general law (M.S., Section 469.174 Subd. 12), the HRA or City must find that the District is in the public interest because: (1)it will discourage commerce, industry, or manufacturing from moving their operations to another state or municipality; or (2)it will result in increased employment in the state; or (3)it will result in preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the state. In addition, M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 4c provides that assistance from an economic development district may not be used to provide assistance to development if more than 15 percent of the buildings and ancillary facilities (determined on a square footage basis), are used for other than certain specified purposes (largely manufacturing, warehousing and distribution facilities). However, M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 4c(d) provides a limited-time exception to these general law rules. Under this provision (originally enacted in 2010 legislature and extended in 2011 legislature), a City may establish an economic development of any kind, notwithstanding the normal findings required under M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 12, and notwithstanding the limitation on types of assisted development under M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 4c. To satisfy the requirement of M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 4c(d), the City finds that: Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-3 (1)the project will create or retain jobs in this state, including construction jobs and that construction of the project would not have commenced before July 1, 2012, without the City and HRA providing assistance under the provisions of this paragraph; (2) construction of the project will begin no later than July 1, 2012; and (3) the request for certification of the district is made no later than June 30, 2012; and In meeting the statutory criteria the HRA and City rely on the following facts and findings: The City’s findings in creating the District is pursuant to M.S. Sections 469.176, Subd. 4c(d) in order to assist in the renovations to the common areas of Southdale Mall. If construction does not commence on or before July 1, 2012, the proposed facility will need to meet the criteria in M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 4c(a), and must satisfy the findings required under M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 12. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 7, the District does not contain any parcel or part of a parcel that qualified under the provisions of M.S., Sections 273.111 or 273.112 or Chapter 473H for taxes payable in any of the five calendar years before the filing of the request for certification of the District. Subsection 2-7.Duration and First Year of Tax Increment of the District Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 1, and M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 1, the duration of the District must be indicated within the TIF Plan. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 1b., the duration of the District will be 8 years after receipt of the first increment by the HRA or City. The date of receipt by the City of the first tax increment is expected to be 2014. Thus, it is estimated that the District, including any modifications of the TIF Plan for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate after 2022, or when the TIF Plan is satisfied. If increment is received in 2013, the term of the District will be 2021. The HRA or City reserves the right to decertify the District prior to the legally required date. (AS MODIFIED APRIL 5, 2016) Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 1, and Section 469.176, Subd. 1, the duration of the District must be indicated within the Tax Increment Financing Plan. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 1b, the duration of the District will be 8 years after receipt of the first increment by the HRA or City. The date of receipt by the City of the first tax increment was August 2013. Thus, it is estimated that the District, including any modification to the Tax Increment Financing Plan for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate after December 31, 2021, or when the Tax Increment Financing Plan is satisfied. The City reserves the right to decertify the District prior to the legally required date. Subsection 2-8.Original Tax Capacity, Tax Rate and Estimated Captured Net Tax Capacity Value/Increment and Notification of Prior Planned Improvements Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 7 and M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, the Original Net Tax Capacity (ONTC) as certified for the District will be based on the market values placed on the property by the assessor in 2011 for taxes payable 2012. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subds. 1 and 2, the County Auditor shall certify in each year (beginning in the payment year 2014) the amount by which the original value has increased or decreased as a result of: 1.Change in tax exempt status of property; 2.Reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the district; Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-4 3.Change due to adjustments, negotiated or court-ordered abatements; 4.Change in the use of the property and classification; 5.Change in state law governing class rates; or 6.Change in previously issued building permits. In any year in which the current Net Tax Capacity (NTC) value of the District declines below the ONTC, no value will be captured and no tax increment will be payable to the HRA or City. The original local tax rate for the District will be the local tax rate for taxes payable 2012, assuming the request for certification is made on or before June 30, 2012. The ONTC and the Original Local Tax Rate for the District appear in the table below. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174 Subd. 4 and M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, 2, and 4, the estimated Captured Net Tax Capacity (CTC) of the District, within the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, upon completion of the projects within the District, will annually approximate tax increment revenues as shown in the table below. The HRA and City request 100 percent of the available increase in tax capacity for repayment of its obligations and current expenditures, beginning in the tax year payable 2014. The Project Tax Capacity (PTC) listed is an estimate of values when the projects within the District are completed. Southdale 2 Tax Increment District Parcels in School District No. 273 Project Estimated Tax Capacity upon Completion (PTC)$4,714,500 Original Estimated Net Tax Capacity (ONTC)$4,457,873 Fiscal Disparities Reduction $65,592 Estimated Captured Tax Capacity (CTC)$191,035 Original Local Tax Rate 1.08160 Estimated Pay 2012 Estimated Annual Tax Increment (CTC x Local Tax Rate)$206,623 Percent Retained by the HRA and City 100% The tax capacity included in this chart is the estimated tax capacity of the District in year 9. The tax capacity of the parcels located in School District 273 in year one is estimated to be $4,458,033.The fiscal disparities reduction will vary from year to year. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-5 Southdale 2 Tax Increment District Parcels in School District No. 280 Project Estimated Tax Capacity upon Completion (PTC)$5,858,175 Original Estimated Net Tax Capacity (ONTC)$4,121,297 Fiscal Disparities Reduction $504,487 Estimated Captured Tax Capacity (CTC)$1,232,391 Original Local Tax Rate 1.14351 Estimated Pay 2012 Estimated Annual Tax Increment (CTC x Local Tax Rate)$1,409,251 Percent Retained by the HRA and City 100% The tax capacity included in this chart is the estimated tax capacity of the District in year 9. The tax capacity of the parcels in the District located in School District 280 in year one is estimated to be $4,887,371. The fiscal disparities reduction will vary from year to year. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 4, the HRA shall, after a due and diligent search, accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor or its notice of the District enlargement pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 4, with a listing of all properties within the District or area of enlargement for which building permits have been issued during the eighteen (18) months immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan by the municipality pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 3. The County Auditor shall increase the original net tax capacity of the District by the net tax capacity of improvements for which a building permit was issued. The City has reviewed the area to be included in the District and has found building permits that were issued in the past 18 months prior to the public hearing. Please see Appendix G for the building permits that were issued. Subsection 2-9.Sources of Revenue/Bonds to be Issued The costs outlined in the Uses of Funds will be financed primarily through the annual collection of tax increments. The HRA or City reserves the right to incur bonds or other indebtedness as a result of the TIF Plan. As presently proposed, the projects within the District will be financed by an interfund loan. Any refunding amounts will be deemed a budgeted cost without a formal TIF Plan Modification. This provision does not obligate the HRA or City to incur debt. The HRA or City will issue bonds or incur other debt only upon the determination that such action is in the best interest of the City. The total estimated tax increment revenues for the District are shown in the table below: SOURCES OF FUNDS TOTAL Tax Increment $11,702,217 Interest $250,000 Land Sale Proceeds/Lease Revenue $0 TOTAL $11,952,217 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-6 The HRA or City may issue bonds (as defined in the TIF Act) secured in whole or in part with tax increments from the District in a maximum principal amount of $8,374,296. Such bonds may be in the form of pay-as- you-go notes, revenue bonds or notes, general obligation bonds, or interfund loans. This estimate of total bonded indebtedness is a cumulative statement of authority under this TIF Plan as of the date of approval. (AS MODIFIED NOVEMBER 20, 2018) The District is being modified to increase the total estimated tax increment revenues for the District as shown in the table below: SOURCES OF FUNDS TOTAL Tax Increment $30,620,000 Interest $500,000 Land Sale Proceeds/Lease Revenue $0 TOTAL $31,120,000 The HRA or City may issue bonds (as defined in the TIF Act) secured in whole or in part with tax increments from the District in a maximum principal amount of $27,542,079. Such bonds may be in the form of pay-as- you-go notes, revenue bonds or notes, general obligation bonds, or interfund loans. This estimate of total bonded indebtedness is a cumulative statement of authority under this TIF Plan as of the date of approval. Subsection 2-10.Uses of Funds Currently under consideration for the District is a proposal to facilitate renovations to the common areas of Southdale Mall. The HRA and City have determined that it will be necessary to provide assistance to the project(s) for certain District costs, as described. The HRA has studied the feasibility of the development or redevelopment of property in and around the District. To facilitate the establishment and development or redevelopment of the District, this TIF Plan authorizes the use of tax increment financing to pay for the cost of certain eligible expenses. The estimate of public costs and uses of funds associated with the District is outlined in the following table. USES OF TAX INCREMENT FUNDS TOTAL Land/Building Acquisition $0 Site Improvements/Preparation $2,274,296 Other Qualifying Improvements $5,000,000 Administrative Costs (up to 10%)$1,100,000 PROJECT COST TOTAL $8,374,296 Interest $3,577,921 PROJECT AND INTEREST COSTS TOTAL $11,952,217 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-7 The total project cost, including financing costs (interest) listed in the table above does not exceed the total projected tax increments for the District as shown in Appendix D. (AS MODIFIED NOVEMBER 20, 2018) The District is being modified in order to increase the estimate of public costs and uses of funds associated with the District as outlined in the following table. USES OF TAX INCREMENT FUNDS TOTAL Land/Building Acquisition $4,000,000 Site Improvements/Preparation $2,274,296 Utilities $0 Other Qualifying Improvements $5,000,000 Construction of Affordable Housing $15,167,783 Administrative Costs (up to 10%)$1,100,000 PROJECT COST TOTAL $27,542,079 Interest $3,577,921 PROJECT AND INTEREST COSTS TOTAL $31,120,000 Estimated capital and administrative costs listed above are subject to change among categories by modification of the TIF Plan without hearings and notices as required for approval of the initial TIF Plan, so long as the total capital and administrative costs combined do not exceed the total listed above. Further, the HRA or City may spend up to 20 percent of the tax increments from the District for activities (described in the table above) located outside the boundaries of the District but within the boundaries of the Project Area (including administrative costs, which are considered to be spend outside the District), subject to all other terms and conditions of this TIF Plan. (AS MODIFIED APRIL 5, 2016) Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 2(d), the HRA and City may elect to increase by up to ten percentage points the permitted amount of expenditures for activities located outside the geographic area of the District. The HRA and City intend to pool $550,000 from the project costs of the District to be used to assist housing that meets the requirements contained in M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 2(d). (AS MODIFIED NOVEMBER 20, 2018) Pursuant to Minnesota Session Laws 2017, Chapter 1, HF No. 1, Article 6, section 11 and Sec. 16, the HRA and City may elect to increase by an additional 25 percentage points (a total of 55 percent) the permitted amount of expenditures for activities located outside the geographic area of the District. The HRA and City intend to pool funds from the project costs of the District to be used to assist housing that meets the requirements contained in M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 2(d). Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-8 Subsection 2-11.Fiscal Disparities Election Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 3, clause b, the HRA or City must calculate fiscal disparities using the following method of computation: (1)The original net tax capacity shall be determined before the application of the fiscal disparity provisions of Chapter 276A or 473F. The current net tax capacity shall exclude any fiscal disparity commercial-industrial net tax capacity increase between the original year and the current year multiplied by the fiscal disparity ratio determined pursuant to M.S., Section 276A.06, subdivision 7 or M.S., Section 473F.08, subdivision 6. Where the original net tax capacity is equal to or greater than the current net tax capacity, there is no captured tax capacity and no tax increment determination. Where the original tax capacity is less than the current tax capacity, the difference between the original net tax capacity and the current net tax capacity is the captured net tax capacity. This amount less any portion thereof which the authority has designated, in its tax increment financing plan, to share with the local taxing districts is the retained captured net tax capacity of the authority. (2)The county auditor shall exclude the retained captured net tax capacity of the authority from the net tax capacity of the local taxing districts in determining local taxing district tax rates. The local tax rates so determined are to be extended against the retained captured net tax capacity of the authority as well as the net tax capacity of the local taxing districts. The tax generated by the extension of the less of (A) the local taxing district tax rates or (B) the original local tax rate to the retained captured net tax capacity of the authority is the tax increment of the authority. Subsection 2-12.Business Subsidies Pursuant to M.S., Section 116J.993, Subd. 3, the following forms of financial assistance are not considered a business subsidy: (1) A business subsidy of less than $150,000; (2)Assistance that is generally available to all businesses or to a general class of similar businesses, such as a line of business, size, location, or similar general criteria; (3) Public improvements to buildings or lands owned by the state or local government that serve a public purpose and do not principally benefit a single business or defined group of businesses at the time the improvements are made; (4) Redevelopment property polluted by contaminants as defined in M.S., Section 116J.552, Subd. 3; (5) Assistance provided for the sole purpose of renovating old or decaying building stock or bringing it up to code and assistance provided for designated historic preservation districts, provided that the assistance is equal to or less than 50% of the total cost; (6) Assistance to provide job readiness and training services if the sole purpose of the assistance is to provide those services; (7) Assistance for housing; (8) Assistance for pollution control or abatement, including assistance for a tax increment financing hazardous substance subdistrict as defined under M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 23; (9) Assistance for energy conservation; (10) Tax reductions resulting from conformity with federal tax law; (11) Workers' compensation and unemployment compensation; (12) Benefits derived from regulation; (13) Indirect benefits derived from assistance to educational institutions; Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-9 (14) Funds from bonds allocated under chapter 474A, bonds issued to refund outstanding bonds, and bonds issued for the benefit of an organization described in section 501 (c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended through December 31, 1999; (15) Assistance for a collaboration between a Minnesota higher education institution and a business; (16) Assistance for a tax increment financing soils condition district as defined under M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 19; (17) Redevelopment when the recipient's investment in the purchase of the site and in site preparation is 70 percent or more of the assessor's current year's estimated market value; (18) General changes in tax increment financing law and other general tax law changes of a principally technical nature; (19) Federal assistance until the assistance has been repaid to, and reinvested by, the state or local government agency; (20) Funds from dock and wharf bonds issued by a seaway port authority; (21) Business loans and loan guarantees of $150,000 or less; (22) Federal loan funds provided through the United States Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration; and (23) Property tax abatements granted under M.S., Section 469.1813 to property that is subject to valuation under Minnesota Rules, chapter 8100. The HRA will comply with M.S., Sections 116J.993 to 116J.995 to the extent the tax increment assistance under this TIF Plan does not fall under any of the above exemptions. Subsection 2-13.County Road Costs Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 1a, the county board may require the HRA or City to pay for all or part of the cost of county road improvements if the proposed development to be assisted by tax increment will, in the judgment of the county, substantially increase the use of county roads requiring construction of road improvements or other road costs and if the road improvements are not scheduled within the next five years under a capital improvement plan or within five years under another county plan. If the county elects to use increments to improve county roads, it must notify the HRA or City within forty- five days of receipt of this TIF Plan. In the opinion of the HRA and City and consultants, the proposed development outlined in this TIF Plan will have little or no impact upon county roads, therefore the TIF Plan was not forwarded to the county 45 days prior to the public hearing. The HRA and City are aware that the county could claim that tax increment should be used for county roads, even after the public hearing. Subsection 2-14.Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions The estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions assumes that the redevelopment contemplated by the TIF Plan would occur without the creation of the District. However, the HRA or City has determined that such development or redevelopment would not occur "but for" tax increment financing and that, therefore, the fiscal impact on other taxing jurisdictions is $0. The estimated fiscal impact of the District would be as follows if the "but for" test was not met: Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-10 IMPACT ON TAX BASE FOR PARCELS LOCATED IN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 273 Estimated 2011/Pay 2012 Total Net Tax Capacity Estimated Captured Tax Capacity (CTC) Upon Completion Percent of CTC to Entity Total Hennepin County 1,253,423,199 191,035 0.0152% City of Edina 96,048,515 191,035 0.1989% Edina ISD No. 273 81,542,007 191,035 0.2343% IMPACT ON TAX RATES Estimated Pay 2012 Extension Rates Percent of Total CTC Potential Taxes Hennepin County 0.487770 45.10%191,035 93,181 City of Edina 0.259080 23.95%191,035 49,493 Edina ISD No. 273 0.224280 20.74%191,035 42,845 Other 0.110470 10.21%191,035 21,104 Total 1.081600 100.00%206,623 IMPACT ON TAX BASE FOR PARCELS LOCATED IN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 280 Estimated 2011/Pay 2012 Total Net Tax Capacity Estimated Captured Tax Capacity (CTC) Upon Completion Percent of CTC to Entity Total Hennepin County 1,253,423,199 1,232,391 0.0983% City of Edina 96,048,515 1,232,391 1.2831% Richfield ISD No. 280 29,902,478 1,232,391 4.1214% Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-11 IMPACT ON TAX RATES Estimated Pay 2012 Extension Rates Percent of Total CTC Potential Taxes Hennepin County 0.487770 42.66%1,232,391 601,123 City of Edina 0.259080 22.66%1,232,391 319,288 Richfield ISD No. 280 0.282900 24.74%1,232,391 348,643 Other 0.113760 9.95%1,232,391 140,197 Total 1.143510 100.00%1,409,251 The estimates listed above display the captured tax capacity when all construction is completed. The tax rate used for calculations is the estimated Pay 2012 rate. The total net capacity for the entities listed above are based on estimated Pay 2012 figures. The District will be certified under the actual Pay 2012 rates, which were unavailable at the time this TIF Plan was prepared. Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175 Subd. 2(b): (1) Estimate of total tax increment. It is estimated that the total amount of tax increment that will be generated over the life of the District is $11,702,217; (2) Probable impact of the District on city provided services and ability to issue debt. An impact of the District on police protection is expected. The Edina Police Department does track all calls for service including property-type calls and crimes. With increased traffic at Southdale Center mall, police calls for service will be increased. However, the proposed mall renovations include changes to common areas designed, in part, to reduce security concerns and police calls, such as the relocation of the transit facility to mall property outside of the mall itself. In addition, proposed housing developments will generate increased police calls. The City does not expect that the proposed development, in and of itself, will necessitate new capital investment in vehicles. The probable impact of the District on fire protection is not expected to be significant. Typically new buildings generate few calls, if any, and are of superior construction. Several of the existing buildings, proposed to be replaced or renovated , have public safety concerns that include several unprotected old buildings with issues such as access, hydrant locations, and lack of sprinkling. The impact of the District on public infrastructure is expected to be minimal. The development is not expected to significantly impact any traffic movements in the area, and is expected to enhance the flow of public transit vehicles in and around the Southdale area. The current infrastructure for sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water will be able to handle the additional volume generated from the proposed development. Potential housing development will generate in excess of $180,000 in sewer and water access charges. Based on the development plans, there are no additional costs associated with street maintenance, sweeping, plowing, lighting and sidewalks. The developer will negotiate maintenance of the proposed transit hub with the Metropolitan Council. The probable impact of any District general obligation tax increment bonds on the ability to issue debt for general fund purposes is expected to be minimal. It is not anticipated that there will be any Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-12 general obligation debt issued in relation to this project, therefore there will be no impact on the City's ability to issue future debt or on the City's debt limit. (3) Estimated amount of tax increment attributable to Edina ISD No. 273 levies. It is estimated that the amount of tax increments over the life of the District that would be attributable to school district levies, assuming the school district's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same, is $293,548; (4) Estimated amount of tax increment attributable to Richfield ISD No. 280 levies. It is estimated that the amount of tax increments over the life of the District that would be attributable to school district levies, assuming the school district's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same, is $2,544,966; (5) Estimated amount of tax increment attributable to county levies. It is estimated that the amount of tax increments over the life of the District that would be attributable to county levies, assuming the county's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same, is $5,026,701; (6) Additional information requested by the county or school district. The City is not aware of any standard questions in a county or school district written policy regarding tax increment districts and impact on county or school district services. The county or school district must request additional information pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175 Subd. 2(b) within 15 days after receipt of the tax increment financing plan. No requests for additional information from the county or school district regarding the proposed development for the District have been received. (AS MODIFIED APRIL 5, 2016) There are no additional fiscal impacts associated with the Modification of this TIF Plan. A copy of the proposed TIF Plan Modification was furnished to the county and school district for comment. Edina Public Schools has requested additional information regarding the proposed development for the 66 West TIF District. The City Manager has responded and provided additional information. (AS MODIFIED NOVEMBER 20, 2018) There are no additional fiscal impacts associated with the Modification of this TIF Plan. Separate fiscal impact estimates will be provided within the TIF Plan under consideration for any district created under the authority of Minnesota Session Laws 2017, Chapter 1, HF No. 1, Article 6, Sec. 11 and 16. A copy of the proposed TIF Plan Modification was furnished to the county and school district for comment. (AS MODIFIED DECEMBER 17, 2019) There are no additional fiscal impacts associated with the Modification of this TIF Plan. Separate fiscal impact estimates will be provided within the TIF Plan under consideration for any district created under the authority of the Special TIF Housing Legislation. A copy of the proposed TIF Plan Modification was furnished to the county and school districts for comment. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-13 Subsection 2-15.Supporting Documentation Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175, Subd. 1 (a), clause 7 the TIF Plan must contain identification and description of studies and analyses used to make the determination set forth in M.S. Section 469.175, Subd. 3, clause (b)(2) and the findings are required in the resolution approving the District. Following is a list of reports and studies on file at the City that support the HRA and City's findings: •Greater Southdale Area Land Use and Transportation Study, December 2005 •Edina Comprehensive Plan Update 2008 •Developer correspondence and Summary of Renovation Costs, February 2011 Subsection 2-16.Definition of Tax Increment Revenues Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 25, tax increment revenues derived from a tax increment financing district include all of the following potential revenue sources: 1.Taxes paid by the captured net tax capacity, but excluding any excess taxes, as computed under M.S., Section 469.177; 2.The proceeds from the sale or lease of property, tangible or intangible, to the extent the property was purchased by the Authority with tax increments; 3.Principal and interest received on loans or other advances made by the Authority with tax increments; 4.Interest or other investment earnings on or from tax increments; 5.Repayments or return of tax increments made to the Authority under agreements for districts for which the request for certification was made after August 1, 1993; and 6.The market value homestead credit paid to the Authority under M.S., Section 273.1384. Subsection 2-17.Modifications to the District In accordance with M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 4, any: 1.Reduction or enlargement of the geographic area of the District, if the reduction does not meet the requirements of M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 4(e); 2.Increase in amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred; 3.A determination to capitalize interest on debt if that determination was not a part of the original TIF Plan; 4.Increase in the portion of the captured net tax capacity to be retained by the HRA or City; 5.Increase in the estimate of the cost of the District, including administrative expenses, that will be paid or financed with tax increment from the District; or 6.Designation of additional property to be acquired by the HRA or City, shall be approved upon the notice and after the discussion, public hearing and findings required for approval of the original TIF Plan. If the District qualifies for certification only under M.S. Section 469.176, Subd. 4c(d), than the District boundaries may not be enlarged after July 1, 2012. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175 Subd. 4(f), the geographic area of the District may be reduced following the date of certification of the original net tax capacity by the county auditor, but shall not be enlarged after five years following the date of certification of the original net tax capacity by the county auditor. The requirements of this paragraph do not apply if (1) the only modification is elimination of parcel(s) from the District and (2) (A) the current net tax capacity of the parcel(s) eliminated from the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-14 District equals or exceeds the net tax capacity of those parcel(s) in the District's original net tax capacity or (B) the HRA agrees that, notwithstanding M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, the original net tax capacity will be reduced by no more than the current net tax capacity of the parcel(s) eliminated from the District. The HRA or City must notify the County Auditor of any modification to the District. Modifications to the District in the form of a budget modification or an expansion of the boundaries will be recorded in the TIF Plan. Subsection 2-18.Administrative Expenses In accordance with M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 14, administrative expenses means all expenditures of the HRA or City, other than: 1.Amounts paid for the purchase of land; 2.Amounts paid to contractors or others providing materials and services, including architectural and engineering services, directly connected with the physical development of the real property in the District; 3.Relocation benefits paid to or services provided for persons residing or businesses located in the District; or 4.Amounts used to pay principal or interest on, fund a reserve for, or sell at a discount bonds issued pursuant to M.S., Section 469.178; or 5.Amounts used to pay other financial obligations to the extent those obligations were used to finance costs described in clauses (1) to (3). For districts for which the request for certification were made before August 1, 1979, or after June 30, 1982, and before August 1, 2001, administrative expenses also include amounts paid for services provided by bond counsel, fiscal consultants, and planning or economic development consultants. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 3, tax increment may be used to pay any authorized and documented administrative expenses for the District up to but not to exceed 10 percent of the total estimated tax increment expenditures authorized by the TIF Plan or the total tax increments, as defined by M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 25, clause (1), from the District, whichever is less. For districts for which certification was requested after July 31, 2001, no tax increment may be used to pay any administrative expenses for District costs which exceed ten percent of total estimated tax increment expenditures authorized by the TIF Plan or the total tax increments, as defined in M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 25, clause (1), from the District, whichever is less. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 4h, tax increments may be used to pay for the County's actual administrative expenses incurred in connection with the District and are not subject to the percentage limits of M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 3. The county may require payment of those expenses by February 15 of the year following the year the expenses were incurred. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469. 177, Subd. 11, the County Treasurer shall deduct an amount (currently .36 percent) of any increment distributed to the HRA or City and the County Treasurer shall pay the amount deducted to the State Commissioner of Management and Budget for deposit in the state general fund to be appropriated to the State Auditor for the cost of financial reporting of tax increment financing information and the cost of examining and auditing authorities' use of tax increment financing. This amount may be adjusted annually by the Commissioner of Revenue. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-15 Subsection 2-19.Limitation of Increment The tax increment pledged to the payment of bonds and interest thereon may be discharged and the District may be terminated if sufficient funds have been irrevocably deposited in the debt service fund or other escrow account held in trust for all outstanding bonds to provide for the payment of the bonds at maturity or redemption date. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 6: if, after four years from the date of certification of the original net tax capacity of the tax increment financing district pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, no demolition, rehabilitation or renovation of property or other site preparation, including qualified improvement of a street adjacent to a parcel but not installation of utility service including sewer or water systems, has been commenced on a parcel located within a tax increment financing district by the authority or by the owner of the parcel in accordance with the tax increment financing plan, no additional tax increment may be taken from that parcel and the original net tax capacity of that parcel shall be excluded from the original net tax capacity of the tax increment financing district. If the authority or the owner of the parcel subsequently commences demolition, rehabilitation or renovation or other site preparation on that parcel including qualified improvement of a street adjacent to that parcel, in accordance with the tax increment financing plan, the authority shall certify to the county auditor that the activity has commenced and the county auditor shall certify the net tax capacity thereof as most recently certified by the commissioner of revenue and add it to the original net tax capacity of the tax increment financing district. The county auditor must enforce the provisions of this subdivision. The authority must submit to the county auditor evidence that the required activity has taken place for each parcel in the district. The evidence for a parcel must be submitted by February 1 of the fifth year following the year in which the parcel was certified as included in the district. For purposes of this subdivision, qualified improvements of a street are limited to (1) construction or opening of a new street, (2) relocation of a street, and (3) substantial reconstruction or rebuilding of an existing street. The HRA or City or a property owner must improve parcels within the District by approximately April 2016 and report such actions to the County Auditor. Subsection 2-20.Use of Tax Increment The HRA or City hereby determines that it will use 100 percent of the captured net tax capacity of taxable property located in the District for the following purposes: 1.To pay the principal of and interest on bonds issued to finance a project; 2.to finance, or otherwise pay public redevelopment costs of the the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area pursuant to M.S., Sections 469.001 to 469.047; 3.To pay for project costs as identified in the budget set forth in the TIF Plan; 4.To finance, or otherwise pay for other purposes as provided in M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 4; 5.To pay principal and interest on any loans, advances or other payments made to or on behalf of the HRA or City or for the benefit of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area by a developer; 6.To finance or otherwise pay premiums and other costs for insurance or other security guaranteeing the payment when due of principal of and interest on bonds pursuant to the TIF Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-16 Plan or pursuant to M.S., Chapter 462C. M.S., Sections 469.152 through 469.165, and/or M.S., Sections 469.178; and 7.To accumulate or maintain a reserve securing the payment when due of the principal and interest on the tax increment bonds or bonds issued pursuant to M.S., Chapter 462C, M.S., Sections 469.152 through 469.165, and/or M.S., Sections 469.178. These revenues shall not be used to circumvent any levy limitations applicable to the City nor for other purposes prohibited by M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 4. Tax increments generated in the District will be paid by Hennepin County to the HRA for the Tax Increment Fund of said District. The HRA or City will pay to the developer(s) annually an amount not to exceed an amount as specified in a developer's agreement to reimburse the costs of land acquisition, public improvements, demolition and relocation, site preparation, and administration. If the request for certification of the District was made after June 30, 2009 and no later than June 30, 2012 and construction commenced in the District by July 1, 2012, tax increments from the District may also be used to provide improvements, loans, subsidies, grants, interest rate subsidies, or assistance in any form to developments consisting of buildings and ancillary facilities. Remaining increment funds will be used for HRA or City administration (up to 10 percent) and for the costs of public improvement activities outside the District. Subsection 2-21.Excess Increments Excess increments, as defined in M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 2, shall be used only to do one or more of the following: 1.Prepay any outstanding bonds; 2.Discharge the pledge of tax increment for any outstanding bonds; 3.Pay into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of any outstanding bonds; or 4.Return the excess to the County Auditor for redistribution to the respective taxing jurisdictions in proportion to their local tax rates. The HRA or City must spend or return the excess increments under paragraph (c) within nine months after the end of the year. In addition, the HRA or City may, subject to the limitations set forth herein, choose to modify the TIF Plan in order to finance additional public costs in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area or the District. Subsection 2-22.Requirements for Agreements with the Developer The HRA or City will review any proposal for private development to determine its conformance with the Redevelopment Plan and with applicable municipal ordinances and codes. To facilitate this effort, the following documents may be requested for review and approval: site plan, construction, mechanical, and electrical system drawings, landscaping plan, grading and storm drainage plan, signage system plan, and any other drawings or narrative deemed necessary by the HRA or City to demonstrate the conformance of the development with City plans and ordinances. The HRA or City may also use the Agreements to address other issues related to the development. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 5, no more than 10 percent, by acreage, of the property to be acquired in the District as set forth in the TIF Plan shall at any time be owned by the HRA or City as a result of acquisition with the proceeds of bonds issued pursuant to M.S., Section 469.178 to which tax increments from property acquired is pledged, unless prior to acquisition in excess of 10 percent of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-17 acreage, the HRA or City concluded an agreement for the development of the property acquired and which provides recourse for the HRA or City should the development not be completed. Subsection 2-23.Assessment Agreements Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 8, the HRA or City may enter into a written assessment agreement in recordable form with the developer of property within the District which establishes a minimum market value of the land and completed improvements for the duration of the District. The assessment agreement shall be presented to the County Assessor who shall review the plans and specifications for the improvements to be constructed, review the market value previously assigned to the land upon which the improvements are to be constructed and, so long as the minimum market value contained in the assessment agreement appears, in the judgment of the assessor, to be a reasonable estimate, the County Assessor shall also certify the minimum market value agreement. Subsection 2-24.Administration of the District Administration of the District will be handled by the Executive Director. Subsection 2-25.Annual Disclosure Requirements Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subds. 5, 6, and 6b the HRA or City must undertake financial reporting for all tax increment financing districts to the Office of the State Auditor, County Board and County Auditor on or before August 1 of each year. M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 5 also provides that an annual statement shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City on or before August 15. If the City fails to make a disclosure or submit a report containing the information required by M.S., Section 469.175 Subd. 5 and Subd. 6, the OSA will direct the County Auditor to withhold the distribution of tax increment from the District. Subsection 2-26.Reasonable Expectations As required by the TIF Act, in establishing the District, the determination has been made that the anticipated development would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the TIF Plan. In making said determination, reliance has been placed upon written representation made by the developer to such effects and upon HRA and City staff awareness of the feasibility of developing the project site(s) within the District. A comparative analysis of estimated market values both with and without establishment of the District and the use of tax increments has been performed as described above. Such analysis is included with the cashflow in Appendix D, and indicates that the increase in estimated market value of the proposed development (less the indicated subtractions) exceeds the estimated market value of the site absent the establishment of the District and the use of tax increments. Subsection 2-27.Other Limitations on the Use of Tax Increment 1.General Limitations. All revenue derived from tax increment shall be used in accordance with the TIF Plan. The revenues shall be used to finance, or otherwise pay public redevelopment costs of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-18 the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area pursuant to M.S., Sections 469.001 to 469.047. Tax increments may not be used to circumvent existing levy limit law. No tax increment may be used for the acquisition, construction, renovation, operation, or maintenance of a building to be used primarily and regularly for conducting the business of a municipality, county, school district, or any other local unit of government or the state or federal government. This provision does not prohibit the use of revenues derived from tax increments for the construction or renovation of a parking structure. 2.Pooling Limitations. At least 80 percent of tax increments from the District must be expended on activities in the District or to pay bonds, to the extent that the proceeds of the bonds were used to finance activities within said district or to pay, or secure payment of, debt service on credit enhanced bonds. Not more than 20 percent of said tax increments may be expended, through a development fund or otherwise, on activities outside of the District except to pay, or secure payment of, debt service on credit enhanced bonds. For purposes of applying this restriction, all administrative expenses must be treated as if they were solely for activities outside of the District. 3.Five Year Limitation on Commitment of Tax Increments. Tax increments derived from the District shall be deemed to have satisfied the 80 percent test set forth in paragraph (2) above only if the five year rule set forth in M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 3, has been satisfied; and beginning with the sixth year following certification of the District, 80 percent of said tax increments that remain after expenditures permitted under said five year rule must be used only to pay previously committed expenditures or credit enhanced bonds as more fully set forth in M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 5. (AS MODIFIED APRIL 5, 2016) Pursuant to M.S., Statute 469.1763, Subd. 2, the HRA and City may elect to increase by up to ten percentage points the permitted amount of expenditures for activities located outside the geographic area of the District for qualifying housing purposes. Therefore, the pooling limitations with respect to this District are increased to not more than 30 percent of tax increments from the District. (AS MODIFIED NOVEMBER 20, 2018) Pooling Limitations. Pursuant to Minnesota Session Laws 2017, Chapter 1, HF No. 1, Article 6, Sec. 11 and Sec. 16, at least 45 percent of tax increments from the District must be expended on activities in the District or to pay bonds, to the extent that the proceeds of the bonds were used to finance activities within said district or to pay, or secure payment of, debt service on credit enhanced bonds. Not more than 55 percent of said tax increments may be expended for qualified housing projects as defined in Minnesota Session Laws 2014, Chapter 308, HF No. 3167, Article 6, Sec. 8 and Minnesota Session Laws 2017, Chapter 1, HF No. 1, Article 6, Sec. 11, through a development fund or otherwise, on activities outside of the District except to pay, or secure payment of, debt service on credit enhanced bonds. For purposes of applying this restriction, all administrative expenses must be treated as if they were solely for activities outside of the District. Subsection 2-28.Summary The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority is establishing the District to preserve and enhance the tax base, redevelop substandard areas, and provide employment opportunities in the City. The TIF Plan for the District was prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc., 3060 Centre Pointe Drive, Roseville, Minnesota 55113, telephone (651) 697-8500. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-19 Appendix A Project Description The City and HRA will be facilitating improvements to the 1.2 million square foot Southdale Center mall which was originally constructed in the 1960's. The redeveloper plans to renovate the interior common area and make exterior improvements to the shopping center. The renovations will consist of new entrance structures, flooring, lighting, signage, restrooms, parking deck lighting, and exterior seating, columns and interior wall treatments. Improvements are planned to be substantially completed by December 31, 2012. The City and HRA intend to finance a portion of the total renovation costs. The HRA will be loaning $5 million to Southdale Center, $250,000 of which is forgiven if a transit station is constructed. Tax increments collected from the Southdale Center parcels will be used to write down principal of the loan and adjacent development will pay for interest on the loan and for the transit station improvements. Appendix A-1 Appendix B Maps of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and the District Appendix B-1 (AS MODIFIED APRIL 5, 2016) Appendix B-2 (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED) Appendix B-3 Appendix C Description of Property to be Included in the District The District encompasses all property and adjacent rights-of-way and abutting roadways identified by the parcel(s) listed below. (AS MODIFIED APRIL 5, 2016) Parcel number 29-028-24-24-0030 is being removed from the District to be included in the 66 West Tax Increment Financing District. Appendix C-1 Appendix D Estimated Cash Flow for the District Appendix D-1 Southdale Mall Renovation and Mixed Use DevelopmentCity of EdinaSouthdale Mall Renovation and Adjacent DevelopmentSchool District 273ASSUMPTIONS AND RATESDistrictType: Economic DevelopmentMaximum/Frozen Local Tax Rate: 108.160% SD 273District Name/Number:Current Local Tax Rate: (Use lesser of Current or Max.) 108.160% Pay 2012 Prelim.County District #:State-wide Tax Rate (Comm./Ind. only used for total taxes) 52.0000% Pay 2012 Prelim.First Year Construction or Inflation on Value2012Market Value Tax Rate (Used for total taxes) 0.18532% Pay 2012 Prelim.Existing District - Specify No. Years RemainingInflation Rate - Every Year:0.00% PROPERTY TAX CLASSES AND CLASS RATES:Interest Rate:5.50%Exempt Class Rate (Exempt) 0.00%Present Value Date:1-Feb-12Commercial Industrial Preferred Class Rate (C/I Pref.)First Period Ending 1-Aug-12 First$150,000 1.50%Tax Year District was Certified:Pay 2012Over $150,000 2.00%Cashflow Assumes First Tax Increment For Development: 2014 Commercial Industrial Class Rate (C/I) 2.00%Years of Tax Increment 9 Rental Housing Class Rate (Rental) 1.25%Assumes Last Year of Tax Increment 2022Affordable Rental Housing Class Rate (Aff. Rental) 0.75%Fiscal Disparities Election [Outside (A), Inside (B), or NA]Inside(B)Non-Homestead Residential (Non-H Res.) 1.25%Incremental or Total Fiscal DisparitiesIncrementalHomestead Residental Class Rate (Hmstd. Res.)Fiscal Disparities Contribution Ratio 34.7413% Pay 2012 Prelim. First$500,000 1.00%Fiscal Disparities Metro-Wide Tax Rate 141.9450% Pay 2012 Prelim. Over $500,000 1.25%Agricultural Non-Homestead 1.00%Percentage Tax Year Property Current ClassAfterLand BuildingTotal Of Value Used Original Original Tax OriginalAfterConversionS/D PID AddressMarket Value Market Value Market Value for DistrictMarket Value Market Value Class Tax Capacity Conversion Orig. Tax Cap.Area/Phase273 29-028-24-33-0001ADDRESS UNASSIGNED0 0 0 100% 0 Pay 2012 Exempt - Exempt - Mall273 29-028-24-33-0004 3500 69TH ST W 571800 0 571,800 100% 571,800 Pay 2012 C/I 11,436 C/I 11,436 Mall273 29-028-24-33-0014ADDRESS UNASSIGNED14,995,000 17,908,800 32,903,800 100% 32,903,800 Pay 2012 C/I 658,076 C/I 658,076 Mall27329‐028‐24‐33‐00213503 GALLERIA2,273,100 5,315,000 7,588,100 100% 7,588,100 Pay 2012 C/I 151,762 C/I 151,762 27329‐028‐24‐33‐00223460 GALLERIA14,624,600 42,085,400 56,710,000 100% 56,710,000 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 1,133,450 C/I Pref. 1,133,450 27329‐028‐24‐33‐00233501 GALLERIA3,287,100 2,112,900 5,400,000 100% 5,400,000 Pay 2012 C/I 108,000 C/I 108,000 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00026825 YORK AVE S2,851,200 100,900 2,952,100 100% 2,952,100 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 58,292 C/I Pref. 58,292 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00073100 70TH ST W1,382,700 943,300 2,326,000 100% 2,326,000 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 45,770 C/I Pref. 45,770 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00106975 YORK AVE S1,586,200 1,059,400 2,645,600 100% 2,645,600 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 52,162 C/I Pref. 52,162 273 29-028-24-34-0019ADDRESS UNASSIGNED2,852,400 0 2,852,400 100% 2,852,400 Pay 2012 C/I 57,048 Rental 35,655 Mall27329‐028‐24‐34‐00206775 YORK AVE S1,162,700 0 1,162,700 100% 1,162,700 Pay 2012 C/I 23,254 C/I 23,254 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00216803 YORK AVE S2,932,400 3,024,800 5,957,200 100% 5,957,200 Pay 2012 C/I 119,144 C/I 119,144 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00226805 YORK AVE S725,200 247,800 973,000 100% 973,000 Pay 2012 C/I 19,460 C/I 19,460 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00243210 GALLERIA2,532,200 2,117,800 4,650,000 100% 4,650,000 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 92,250 C/I Pref. 92,250 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00256905 YORK AVE S2,084,400 0 2,084,400 100% 2,084,400 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 40,938 C/I Pref. 40,938 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00263121 69TH ST W1,482,100 10,202,900 11,685,000 100% 11,685,000 Pay 2012 Rental 146,063 Rental 146,063 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00333209 Galleria617,400 617,400 100% 617,400 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 7,718 Non-H Res. 7,718 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00343209 Galleria1,179,000 1,179,000 100% 1,179,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 14,738 Non-H Res. 14,738 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00353209 Galleria620,000 620,000 100% 620,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 7,750 Non-H Res. 7,750 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00363209 Galleria779,000 779,000 100% 779,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 9,738 Non-H Res. 9,738 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00373209 Galleria591,000 591,000 100% 591,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 7,388 Non-H Res. 7,388 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00383209 Galleria589,000 589,000 100% 589,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 7,363 Non-H Res. 7,363 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00393209 Galleria417,000 417,000 100% 417,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 5,213 Non-H Res. 5,213 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00403209 Galleria1,012,000 1,012,000 100% 1,012,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 12,650 Non-H Res. 12,650 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00413209 Galleria671,100 671,100 100% 671,100 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 8,389 Non-H Res. 8,389 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00423209 Galleria1,179,000 1,179,000 100% 1,179,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 14,738 Non-H Res. 14,738 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00433209 Galleria626,000 626,000 100% 626,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 7,825 Non-H Res. 7,825 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00443209 Galleria639,000 639,000 100% 639,000 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 6,738 Hmstd. Res. 6,738 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00453209 Galleria567,000 567,000 100% 567,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 7,088 Non-H Res. 7,088 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00463209 Galleria565,500 565,500 100% 565,500 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 5,819 Hmstd. Res. 5,819 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00473209 Galleria396,100 396,100 100% 396,100 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 3,961 Hmstd. Res. 3,961 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00483209 Galleria1,179,000 1,179,000 100% 1,179,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 14,738 Non-H Res. 14,738 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00493209 Galleria1,005,400 0 1,005,400 100% 1,005,400 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 11,318 Hmstd. Res. 11,318 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00503209 Galleria1,179,000 1,179,000 100% 1,179,000 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 13,488 Hmstd. Res. 13,488 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00513209 Galleria680,100 680,100 100% 680,100 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 7,251 Hmstd. Res. 7,251 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00523209 Galleria768,000 768,000 100% 768,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 9,600 Non-H Res. 9,600 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00533209 Galleria591,000 591,000 100% 591,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 7,388 Non-H Res. 7,388 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00543209 Galleria560,000 560,000 100% 560,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 7,000 Non-H Res. 7,000 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00553209 Galleria389,400 389,400 100% 389,400 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 4,868 Non-H Res. 4,868 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00563209 Galleria1,219,000 1,219,000 100% 1,219,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 15,238 Non-H Res. 15,238 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00573209 Galleria916,200 916,200 100% 916,200 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 10,203 Hmstd. Res. 10,203 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00583209 Galleria1,226,900 1,226,900 100% 1,226,900 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 14,086 Hmstd. Res. 14,086 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00593209 Galleria668,000 668,000 100% 668,000 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 7,100 Hmstd. Res. 7,100 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00603209 Galleria754,000 754,000 100% 754,000 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 8,175 Hmstd. Res. 8,175 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00613209 Galleria591,000 591,000 100% 591,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 7,388 Non-H Res. 7,388 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00623209 Galleria478,300 478,300 100% 478,300 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 5,979 Non-H Res. 5,979 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00633209 Galleria323,000 323,000 100% 323,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 4,038 Non-H Res. 4,038 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00643209 Galleria1,268,300 1,268,300 100% 1,268,300 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 14,604 Hmstd. Res. 14,604 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00653209 Galleria1,047,000 1,047,000 100% 1,047,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 13,088 Non-H Res. 13,088 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00663209 Galleria1,225,000 1,225,000 100% 1,225,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 15,313 Non-H Res. 15,313 BASE VALUE INFORMATION (Original Tax Capacity) 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00673209 Galleria677,100 677,100 100% 677,100 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 7,214 Hmstd. Res. 7,214 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00683209 Galleria746,000 746,000 100% 746,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 9,325 Non-H Res. 9,325 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00693209 Galleria615,000 615,000 100% 615,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 7,688 Non-H Res. 7,688 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00703209 Galleria534,500 534,500 100% 534,500 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 6,681 Non-H Res. 6,681 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00713209 Galleria380,200 380,200 100% 380,200 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 4,753 Non-H Res. 4,753 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00723209 Galleria1,392,100 1,392,100 100% 1,392,100 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 17,401 Non-H Res. 17,401 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00733209 Galleria1,005,000 1,005,000 100% 1,005,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 12,563 Non-H Res. 12,563 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00743209 Galleria1,179,000 1,179,000 100% 1,179,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 14,738 Non-H Res. 14,738 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00753209 Galleria773,400 773,400 100% 773,400 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 9,668 Non-H Res. 9,668 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00763209 Galleria776,000 776,000 100% 776,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 9,700 Non-H Res. 9,700 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00773209 Galleria503,000 503,000 100% 503,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 6,288 Non-H Res. 6,288 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00783209 Galleria565,000 565,000 100% 565,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 7,063 Non-H Res. 7,063 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00793209 Galleria380,000 380,000 100% 380,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 4,750 Non-H Res. 4,750 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00803209 Galleria1,270,800 1,270,800 100% 1,270,800 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 14,635 Hmstd. Res. 14,635 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00813209 Galleria1,005,000 1,005,000 100% 1,005,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 12,563 Non-H Res. 12,563 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00823209 Galleria1,307,700 1,307,700 100% 1,307,700 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 15,096 Hmstd. Res. 15,096 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00833209 Galleria669,600 669,600 100% 669,600 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 8,370 Non-H Res. 8,370 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00843209 Galleria791,500 791,500 100% 791,500 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 9,894 Non-H Res. 9,894 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00853209 Galleria648,400 648,400 100% 648,400 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 6,855 Hmstd. Res. 6,855 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00863209 Galleria543,500 543,500 100% 543,500 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 6,794 Non-H Res. 6,794 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00873209 Galleria380,000 380,000 100% 380,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 4,750 Non-H Res. 4,750 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00883209 Galleria1,303,900 1,303,900 100% 1,303,900 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 15,049 Hmstd. Res. 15,049 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00893209 Galleria1,005,000 1,005,000 100% 1,005,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 12,563 Non-H Res. 12,563 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00903209 Galleria1,260,000 1,260,000 100% 1,260,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 15,750 Non-H Res. 15,750 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00913209 Galleria713,400 713,400 100% 713,400 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 7,668 Hmstd. Res. 7,668 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00923209 Galleria977,300 977,300 100% 977,300 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 12,216 Non-H Res. 12,216 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00933209 Galleria591,000 591,000 100% 591,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 7,388 Non-H Res. 7,388 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00943209 Galleria522,900 522,900 100% 522,900 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 6,536 Non-H Res. 6,536 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00953209 Galleria380,000 380,000 100% 380,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 4,750 Non-H Res. 4,750 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00963209 Galleria1,337,000 1,337,000 100% 1,337,000 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 15,463 Hmstd. Res. 15,463 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00973209 Galleria999,900 999,900 100% 999,900 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 12,499 Non-H Res. 12,499 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00983209 Galleria1,989,300 1,989,300 100% 1,989,300 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 23,616 Hmstd. Res. 23,616 27329‐028‐24‐34‐00993209 Galleria765,800 765,800 100% 765,800 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 9,573 Non-H Res. 9,573 27329‐028‐24‐34‐01003209 Galleria1,192,800 1,192,800 100% 1,192,800 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 13,660 Hmstd. Res. 13,660 27329‐028‐24‐34‐01013209 Galleria1,052,000 1,052,000 100% 1,052,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 13,150 Non-H Res. 13,150 27329‐028‐24‐34‐01023209 Galleria1,325,400 1,325,400 100% 1,325,400 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 15,318 Hmstd. Res. 15,318 27329‐028‐24‐34‐01033209 Galleria1,288,300 1,288,300 100% 1,288,300 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 16,104 Non-H Res. 16,104 27329‐028‐24‐34‐01043209 Galleria1,900,000 1,900,000 100% 1,900,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 23,750 Non-H Res. 23,750 27329‐028‐24‐34‐01053209 Galleria729,000 729,000 100% 729,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 9,113 Non-H Res. 9,113 27329‐028‐24‐34‐01063209 Galleria931,000 931,000 100% 931,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 11,638 Non-H Res. 11,638 27329‐028‐24‐34‐01073209 Galleria1,093,000 1,093,000 100% 1,093,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 13,663 Non-H Res. 13,663 27329‐028‐24‐34‐01083209 Galleria1,660,100 1,660,100 100% 1,660,100 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 20,751 Non-H Res. 20,751 27329‐028‐24‐34‐01093209 Galleria893,000 893,000 100% 893,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 11,163 Non-H Res. 11,163 27329‐028‐24‐34‐01103209 Galleria2,322,400 2,322,400 100% 2,322,400 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 29,030 Non-H Res. 29,030 27329‐028‐24‐34‐01113209 Galleria647,000 647,000 100% 647,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 8,088 Non-H Res. 8,088 27329‐028‐24‐34‐01123209 Galleria1,100,600 1,100,600 100% 1,100,600 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 13,758 Non-H Res. 13,758 27329‐028‐24‐34‐01133209 Galleria1,214,000 1,214,000 100% 1,214,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 15,175 Non-H Res. 15,175 27329‐028‐24‐34‐01143209 Galleria1,203,200 1,203,200 100% 1,203,200 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 15,040 Non-H Res. 15,040 273 30-028-24-41-0001 6600 France Avenue South 18,914,100 15,428,500 34,342,600 100% 34,342,600 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 686,102 C/I Pref. 686,102 273 30-028-24-44-0001 6996 France Avenue South 360,000 40,000 400,000 100% 400,000 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 7,250 C/I Pref. 7,250 27330‐028‐24‐44‐00033950 70TH ST W1,021,100 622,000 1,643,100 100% 1,643,100 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 32,112 C/I Pref. 32,112 27330‐028‐24‐44‐00044040 70TH ST W1,081,000 1,376,900 2,457,900 100% 2,457,900 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 48,408 C/I Pref. 48,408 27330‐028‐24‐44‐00056950 FRANCE AVE S789,700 1,208,300 1,998,000 100% 1,998,000 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 39,210 C/I Pref. 39,210 273 30-028-24-44-0006 3910 70th Street West 139,900 213,100 353,000 100% 353,000 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 6,310 C/I Pref. 6,310 27330‐028‐24‐44‐00576900 FRANCE AVE S498,100 239,600 737,700 100% 737,700 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 14,004 C/I Pref. 14,004 27330‐028‐24‐44‐00583905 69TH ST W847,200 392,600 1,239,800 100% 1,239,800 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 24,046 C/I Pref. 24,046 27330‐028‐24‐44‐00593939 69TH ST W912,500 912,500 100% 912,500 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 17,500 C/I Pref. 17,500 0 100% 0 Pay 2012 - - 152,963,500 104,640,000 257,603,500257,603,500 4,479,266 4,457,873Note:1. Base values are based upon review of County website on 3/7/12 of values assessed 1/2/11 for taxes payable 2012.2. Parcels are located within School district 273 and Watershed District 1.BASE VALUE INFORMATION (Original Tax Capacity) Southdale Mall Renovation and Mixed Use DevelopmentCity of EdinaSouthdale Mall Renovation and Adjacent DevelopmentSchool District 273Estimated Taxable Total Taxable Property Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage First YearMarket Value Market Value Total Market Tax Project Project Tax Completed Completed Completed Completed Full TaxesArea/Phase New UsePer Sq. Ft./UnitPer Sq. Ft./Unit Sq. Ft./UnitsValue Class Tax Capacity Capacity/Unit2012 2013 2014 2015 PayableMall Retail 35,000,000 35,000,000 1 35,000,000 C/I 700,000 97% 97% 97% 100% 2017ApartmentsApartments 34,900,000 34,900,000 1 34,900,000 Rental 436,250 70% 70% 75% 100% 2017Office Office 36,000,000 36,000,000 1 36,000,000 C/I Pref. 719,250 96% 100% 100% 100% 2015Retail Retail 102,500,000 102,500,000 1 102,500,000 C/I Pref. 2,049,250 96% 96% 100% 100% 2016Condos/Apts. Condominiums 890,000 890,000 82 72,980,000 Hmstd. Res. 809,750 100% 100% 100% 100% 2014TOTAL281,380,000 4,714,500 Subtotal Residential #VALUE! 107,880,000 1,246,000 Subtotal Commercial/Ind.3 173,500,000 3,468,500 Note:1. Renovated mall market value based upon tax estimates from mall owner.2. Other development values based on proposals received by the City of Edina and estimates from City AssessorTotal Fiscal Local Local Fiscal State-wide MarketTax DisparitiesTax Property DisparitiesPropertyValue TotalNew UseCapacityTax Capacity CapacityTaxes Taxes Taxes Taxes TaxesRetail 700,000 243,189 456,811 494,087 345,195 364,000 64,862 1,268,143Apartments436,250 0 436,250 471,848 0 0 64,677 536,525Office 719,250 249,877 469,373 507,674 354,688 374,010 66,715 1,303,087Retail 2,049,250 711,936 1,337,314 1,446,439 1,010,558 1,065,610 189,953 3,712,559Condominiums809,750 0 809,750 875,826 0 0 135,247 1,011,072TOTAL 4,714,500 1,205,002 3,509,498 3,795,873 1,710,440 1,803,620 521,453 7,831,387Note: 1. Taxes and tax increment will vary signficantly from year to year depending upon values, rates, state law, fiscal disparities and other factors which cannot be predicted.2. If tax increment is received in 2013 then the district will be one year shorter.PROJECT INFORMATION (Project Tax Capacity)TAX CALCULATIONS 6/29/2012Base Value Assumptions - Page 6City of EdinaSouthdale Mall Renovation and Adjacent DevelopmentSchool District 273Southdale Mall Renovation and Adjacent DevelopmentProject Original Fiscal Captured LocalAnnual Semi-Annual StateAdmin. Semi-Annual Semi-Annual PERIOD% ofTax Tax Disparities Tax Tax Gross Tax Gross TaxAuditorat Net Tax Present ENDING Tax PaymentOTC CapacityCapacityIncremental CapacityRate Increment Increment 0.36% 10% IncrementValueYrs.YearDate- - - - 08/01/12- - - - 02/01/13- - - - 08/01/13- - - - 02/01/14100% 4,458,033 (4,457,873) - 160 108.160% 173 86 (0) (9) 77 68 0.5 2014 08/01/14100% 4,458,033 (4,457,873) - 160 108.160% 173 86 (0) (9) 77 133 1 2014 02/01/15100% 4,480,655 (4,457,873) - 22,782 108.160% 24,641 12,320 (44) (1,228) 11,048 9,271 1.5 2015 08/01/15100% 4,480,655 (4,457,873) - 22,782 108.160% 24,641 12,320 (44) (1,228) 11,048 18,164 2 2015 02/01/16100% 4,584,438 (4,457,873) (20,346) 106,218 108.160% 114,886 57,443 (207) (5,724) 51,512 58,517 2.5 2016 08/01/16100% 4,584,438 (4,457,873) (20,346) 106,218 108.160% 114,886 57,443 (207) (5,724) 51,512 97,790 3 2016 02/01/17100% 4,714,500 (4,457,873) (27,642) 228,985 108.160% 247,670 123,835 (446) (12,339) 111,050 180,188 3.5 2017 08/01/17100% 4,714,500 (4,457,873) (27,642) 228,985 108.160% 247,670 123,835 (446) (12,339) 111,050 260,382 4 2017 02/01/18100% 4,714,500 (4,457,873) (65,592) 191,034 108.160% 206,623 103,311 (372) (10,294) 92,645 325,494 4.5 2018 08/01/18100% 4,714,500 (4,457,873) (65,592) 191,034 108.160% 206,623 103,311 (372) (10,294) 92,645 388,863 5 2018 02/01/19100% 4,714,500 (4,457,873) (65,592) 191,034 108.160% 206,623 103,311 (372) (10,294) 92,645 450,536 5.5 2019 08/01/19100% 4,714,500 (4,457,873) (65,592) 191,034 108.160% 206,623 103,311 (372) (10,294) 92,645 510,559 6 2019 02/01/20100% 4,714,500 (4,457,873) (65,592) 191,034 108.160% 206,623 103,311 (372) (10,294) 92,645 568,975 6.5 2020 08/01/20100% 4,714,500 (4,457,873) (65,592) 191,034 108.160% 206,623 103,311 (372) (10,294) 92,645 625,828 7 2020 02/01/21100% 4,714,500 (4,457,873) (65,592) 191,034 108.160% 206,623 103,311 (372) (10,294) 92,645 681,159 7.5 2021 08/01/21100% 4,714,500 (4,457,873) (65,592) 191,034 108.160% 206,623 103,311 (372) (10,294) 92,645 735,009 8 2021 02/01/22100% 4,714,500 (4,457,873) (65,592) 191,034 108.160% 206,623 103,311 (372) (10,294) 92,645 787,418 8.5 2022 08/01/22100% 4,714,500 (4,457,873) (65,592) 191,034 108.160% 206,623 103,311 (372) (10,294) 92,645 838,424 9 2022 02/01/23 Total1,420,483 (5,114) (141,537) 1,273,832 Present Value From 02/01/2012 Present Value Rate 5.50% 934,948 (3,366) (93,158) 838,424 Prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc. - Estimates OnlyN:\Minnsota\EDINA\Housing Economic Redevelopment\TIF\TIF Districts\Southdale 2\TIF Runs\TIF Run Option B SD 273 jc Southdale Mall Renovation and Mixed Use DevelopmentCity of EdinaSouthdale Mall Renovation and Adjacent DevelopmentSchool District 280ASSUMPTIONS AND RATESDistrictType: Economic DevelopmentMaximum/Frozen Local Tax Rate: 114.351% S/D 280District Name/Number:Current Local Tax Rate: (Use lesser of Current or Max.) 114.351% Pay 2012 Prelim.County District #:State-wide Tax Rate (Comm./Ind. only used for total taxes) 52.0000% Pay 2012 Prelim.First Year Construction or Inflation on Value2012Market Value Tax Rate (Used for total taxes) 0.15860% Pay 2012 Prelim.Existing District - Specify No. Years RemainingInflation Rate - Every Year:0.00% PROPERTY TAX CLASSES AND CLASS RATES:Interest Rate:5.50%Exempt Class Rate (Exempt) 0.00%Present Value Date:1-Feb-12Commercial Industrial Preferred Class Rate (C/I Pref.)First Period Ending 1-Aug-12 First$150,000 1.50%Tax Year District was Certified:Pay 2012Over $150,000 2.00%Cashflow Assumes First Tax Increment For Development: 2014 Commercial Industrial Class Rate (C/I) 2.00%Years of Tax Increment 9 Rental Housing Class Rate (Rental) 1.25%Assumes Last Year of Tax Increment 2022Affordable Rental Housing Class Rate (Aff. Rental) 0.75%Fiscal Disparities Election [Outside (A), Inside (B), or NA]Inside(B)Non-Homestead Residential (Non-H Res.) 1.25%Incremental or Total Fiscal DisparitiesIncrementalHomestead Residental Class Rate (Hmstd. Res.)Fiscal Disparities Contribution Ratio 34.7413% Pay 2012 Prelim. First$500,000 1.00%Fiscal Disparities Metro-Wide Tax Rate 141.9450% Pay 2012 Prelim. Over $500,000 1.25%Agricultural Non-Homestead 1.00%Percentage Tax Year Property Current ClassAfterLand BuildingTotal Of Value Used Original Original Tax OriginalAfterConversionS/D PID AddressMarket Value Market Value Market Value for DistrictMarket Value Market Value Class Tax Capacity Conversion Orig. Tax Cap.28029‐028‐24‐23‐0001ADDRESS UNASSIGNED1,384,800 1,316,200 2,701,000 100% 2,701,000 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 53,270 C/I Pref. 53,270 28029‐028‐24‐23‐00076533 Drew Avenue South531,900 502,000 1,033,900 100% 1,033,900 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 19,928 C/I Pref. 19,928 28029‐028‐24‐23‐00086525 Drew Avenue S445,000 120,700 565,700 100% 565,700 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 10,564 C/I Pref. 10,564 28029‐028‐24‐23‐00096517 DREW AVE S529,500 1,235,500 1,765,000 100% 1,765,000 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 34,550 C/I Pref. 34,550 28029‐028‐24‐23‐00103625 65TH ST W525,300 2,040,700 2,566,000 100% 2,566,000 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 50,570 C/I Pref. 50,570 28029‐028‐24‐23‐0011ADDRESS UNASSIGNED285,800 0 285,800 100% 285,800 Pay 2012 C/I 5,716 C/I 5,716 28029‐028‐24‐23‐00123400 66TH ST W2,990,400 2,363,600 5,354,000 100% 5,354,000 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 106,330 C/I Pref. 106,330 28029‐028‐24‐23‐0167ADDRESS UNASSIGNED0 0 0 100% 0 Pay 2012 Exempt - Exempt - 28029‐028‐24‐23‐01726545 FRANCE5,118,000 24,202,500 29,320,500 100% 29,320,500 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 585,660 C/I Pref. 585,660 28029‐028‐24‐23‐01736525 FRANCE AVE S1,107,600 11,092,400 12,200,000 100% 12,200,000 Pay 2012 C/I 244,000 C/I 244,000 280 29-028-24-24-0001 3316 66th Street West 1,494,600 2,205,400 3,700,000 100% 3,700,000 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 73,250 Rental 46,250 28029‐028‐24‐24‐0002ADDRESS UNASSIGNED403,100 0 403,100 100% 403,100 Pay 2012 C/I 8,062 C/I 8,062 280 29-028-24-24-0004 Thrivent Financial - No Address 535,600 0 535,600 100% 535,600 Pay 2012 C/I 10,712 Rental 6,695 280 29-028-24-24-0005 3250 66th Street West 2,091,800 755,900 2,847,700 100% 2,847,700 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 56,204 Rental 35,596 280 29-028-24-24-0007 6550 York Avenue 2,274,300 2,611,700 4,886,000 100% 4,886,000 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 96,970 Rental 61,075 280 29-028-24-24-0025 6515 Barrie Road 675,000 979,300 1,654,300 100% 1,654,300 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 32,336 Rental 20,679 280 29-028-24-24-0026 6525 Barrie Road 480,000 806,000 1,286,000 100% 1,286,000 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 24,970 Rental 16,075 280 29-028-24-24-0027 6519 Barrie Road 827,400 289,500 1,116,900 100% 1,116,900 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 21,588 Rental 13,961 280 29-028-24-24-0030 3330 66th Street West 917,900 429,500 1,347,400 100% 1,347,400 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 26,198 Rental 16,843 28029‐028‐24‐24‐0031ADDRESS UNASSIGNED36,900 0 36,900 100% 36,900 Pay 2012 C/I 738 C/I 738 28029‐028‐24‐24‐00326500 BARRIE RD478,400 721,600 1,200,000 100% 1,200,000 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 23,250 C/I Pref. 23,250 28029‐028‐24‐24‐01206444 Xerxes Avenue South 271,800 328,200 600,000 100% 600,000 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 11,250 Rental 7,500 280 29-028-24-24-0121 6500 Xerxes Avenue 244,100 206,400 450,500 100% 450,500 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 8,260 Rental 5,631 28029‐028‐24‐24‐02236525 YORK AVE S1,671,000 1,645,400 3,316,400 100% 3,316,400 Pay 2012 C/I 66,328 C/I 66,328 28029‐028‐24‐31‐00023101 66TH ST W1,241,200 1,000 1,242,200 100% 1,242,200 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 24,094 C/I Pref. 24,094 280 29-028-24-31-0003 6725 York Avenue South 2,674,000 1,000 2,675,000 100% 2,675,000 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 52,750 C/I Pref. 52,750 280 29-028-24-31-0005 3425 66TH ST W 369,500 663,700 1,033,200 100% 1,033,200 Pay 2012 C/I 20,664 C/I 20,664 28029‐028‐24‐31‐00063230 SOUTHDALE CIR714,700 220,600 935,300 100% 935,300 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 17,956 C/I Pref. 17,956 28029‐028‐24‐31‐00073220 SOUTHDALE CIR1,124,800 125,400 1,250,200 100% 1,250,200 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 24,254 C/I Pref. 24,254 28029‐028‐24‐31‐00083210 SOUTHDALE CIR467,500 58,000 525,500 100% 525,500 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 9,760 C/I Pref. 9,760 28029‐028‐24‐31‐00093200 SOUTHDALE CIR672,500 7,700 680,200 100% 680,200 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 12,854 C/I Pref. 12,854 28029‐028‐24‐31‐00103240 SOUTHDALE CIR563,100 1,000 564,100 100% 564,100 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 10,532 C/I Pref. 10,532 28029‐028‐24‐31‐00116612 XERXES AVE S131,400 56,900 188,300 100% 188,300 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,883 Hmstd. Res. 1,883 28029‐028‐24‐31‐00126616 XERXES AVE S131,400 108,100 239,500 100% 239,500 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,395 Hmstd. Res. 2,395 28029‐028‐24‐31‐00136620 XERXES AVE S131,400 72,400 203,800 100% 203,800 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,038 Hmstd. Res. 2,038 28029‐028‐24‐31‐00146624 XERXES AVE S131,400 68,200 199,600 100% 199,600 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,996 Hmstd. Res. 1,996 28029‐028‐24‐31‐00156628 XERXES AVE S145,300 72,700 218,000 100% 218,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 2,725 Non-H Res. 2,725 28029‐028‐24‐31‐00166700 XERXES AVE S145,300 79,600 224,900 100% 224,900 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,249 Hmstd. Res. 2,249 28029‐028‐24‐31‐00176704 XERXES AVE S131,400 46,800 178,200 100% 178,200 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,782 Hmstd. Res. 1,782 28029‐028‐24‐31‐00186708 XERXES AVE S131,400 74,300 205,700 100% 205,700 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,057 Hmstd. Res. 2,057 28029‐028‐24‐31‐00196712 XERXES AVE S131,400 82,900 214,300 100% 214,300 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,143 Hmstd. Res. 2,143 280 29-028-24-31-0024 300 SOUTHDALE CENTER 4,272,600 1,000 4,273,600 100% 4,273,600 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 84,722 C/I Pref. 84,722 280 29-028-24-31-0025 6636 YORK AVE S 967,800 1,000 968,800 100% 968,800 Pay 2012 C/I 19,376 C/I 19,376 28029‐028‐24‐31‐00266755 YORK AVE S0 0 0 100% 0 Pay 2012 Exempt - Exempt - 28029‐028‐24‐31‐00276775 YORK AVE S3,464,000 2,487,600 5,951,600 100% 5,951,600 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 118,282 C/I Pref. 118,282 280 29-028-24-32-0001 3501 66TH ST W 616,600 0 616,600 100% 616,600 Pay 2012 C/I 12,332 C/I 12,332 280 29-028-24-32-0003 200 SOUTHDALE CENTER 1479500 2958500 4,438,000 100% 4,438,000 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 88,010 C/I Pref. 88,010 280 29-028-24-32-0008 100 SOUTHDALE CENTER 1,883,700 7,193,300 9,077,000 100% 9,077,000 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 180,790 C/I Pref. 180,790 280 29-028-24-32-0009 10 SOUTHDALE CENTER 27,696,800 45,616,200 73,313,000 100% 73,313,000 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 1,465,510 C/I Pref. 1,465,510 280 30-028-24-14-0007 4005 65th Street 926,400 558,100 1,484,500 100% 1,484,500 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 28,940 C/I Pref. 28,940 BASE VALUE INFORMATION (Original Tax Capacity) 280 30-028-24-14-0008 6500 France Avenue South 1,129,600 1,458,600 2,588,200 100% 2,588,200 Pay 2012 C/I Pref. 51,014 C/I Pref. 51,014 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00096566 France116,200 116,200 100% 116,200 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,162 Hmstd. Res. 1,162 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00106566 France229,200 229,200 100% 229,200 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,292 Hmstd. Res. 2,292 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00116566 France178,900 178,900 100% 178,900 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,789 Hmstd. Res. 1,789 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00126566 France178,900 178,900 100% 178,900 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,789 Hmstd. Res. 1,789 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00136566 France229,200 229,200 100% 229,200 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,292 Hmstd. Res. 2,292 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00146566 France116,200 116,200 100% 116,200 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,162 Hmstd. Res. 1,162 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00156566 France151,800 151,800 100% 151,800 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,518 Hmstd. Res. 1,518 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00166566 France116,200 116,200 100% 116,200 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,162 Hmstd. Res. 1,162 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00176566 France218,500 218,500 100% 218,500 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,185 Hmstd. Res. 2,185 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00186566 France224,300 224,300 100% 224,300 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,243 Hmstd. Res. 2,243 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00196566 France170,400 170,400 100% 170,400 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,704 Hmstd. Res. 1,704 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00206566 France183,800 183,800 100% 183,800 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 2,298 Non-H Res. 2,298 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00216566 France170,400 170,400 100% 170,400 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,704 Hmstd. Res. 1,704 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00226566 France183,800 183,800 100% 183,800 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,838 Hmstd. Res. 1,838 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00236566 France218,500 218,500 100% 218,500 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,185 Hmstd. Res. 2,185 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00246566 France229,200 229,200 100% 229,200 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,292 Hmstd. Res. 2,292 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00256566 France151,800 151,800 100% 151,800 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,518 Hmstd. Res. 1,518 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00266566 France116,200 116,200 100% 116,200 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 1,453 Non-H Res. 1,453 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00276566 France151,800 151,800 100% 151,800 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,518 Hmstd. Res. 1,518 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00286566 France116,200 116,200 100% 116,200 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,162 Hmstd. Res. 1,162 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00296566 France213,600 213,600 100% 213,600 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,136 Hmstd. Res. 2,136 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00306566 France224,300 224,300 100% 224,300 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,243 Hmstd. Res. 2,243 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00316566 France170,400 170,400 100% 170,400 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,704 Hmstd. Res. 1,704 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00326566 France178,900 178,900 100% 178,900 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 2,236 Non-H Res. 2,236 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00336566 France170,400 170,400 100% 170,400 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 2,130 Non-H Res. 2,130 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00346566 France183,800 183,800 100% 183,800 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,838 Hmstd. Res. 1,838 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00356566 France213,600 213,600 100% 213,600 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,136 Hmstd. Res. 2,136 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00366566 France229,200 229,200 100% 229,200 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,292 Hmstd. Res. 2,292 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00376566 France156,700 156,700 100% 156,700 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 1,959 Non-H Res. 1,959 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00386566 France116,200 116,200 100% 116,200 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 1,453 Non-H Res. 1,453 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00416566 France213,600 213,600 100% 213,600 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,136 Hmstd. Res. 2,136 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00426566 France224,300 224,300 100% 224,300 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 2,804 Non-H Res. 2,804 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00436566 France170,400 170,400 100% 170,400 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,704 Hmstd. Res. 1,704 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00446566 France183,800 183,800 100% 183,800 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,838 Hmstd. Res. 1,838 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00456566 France170,400 170,400 100% 170,400 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,704 Hmstd. Res. 1,704 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00466566 France178,900 178,900 100% 178,900 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,789 Hmstd. Res. 1,789 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00476566 France213,600 213,600 100% 213,600 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,136 Hmstd. Res. 2,136 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00486566 France229,200 229,200 100% 229,200 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,292 Hmstd. Res. 2,292 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00696566 France170,400 170,400 100% 170,400 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,704 Hmstd. Res. 1,704 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00706566 France183,800 183,800 100% 183,800 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,838 Hmstd. Res. 1,838 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00716566 France213,600 213,600 100% 213,600 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,136 Hmstd. Res. 2,136 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00726566 France229,200 229,200 100% 229,200 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,292 Hmstd. Res. 2,292 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00736566 France156,700 156,700 100% 156,700 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,567 Hmstd. Res. 1,567 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00746566 France116,200 116,200 100% 116,200 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,162 Hmstd. Res. 1,162 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00776566 France224,300 224,300 100% 224,300 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,243 Hmstd. Res. 2,243 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00786566 France235,000 235,000 100% 235,000 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,350 Hmstd. Res. 2,350 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00796566 France178,900 178,900 100% 178,900 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,789 Hmstd. Res. 1,789 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00806566 France187,400 187,400 100% 187,400 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,874 Hmstd. Res. 1,874 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00816566 France183,800 183,800 100% 183,800 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,838 Hmstd. Res. 1,838 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00826566 France187,400 187,400 100% 187,400 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,874 Hmstd. Res. 1,874 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00836566 France224,300 224,300 100% 224,300 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,243 Hmstd. Res. 2,243 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00846566 France239,900 239,900 100% 239,900 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,399 Hmstd. Res. 2,399 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00856566 France159,400 159,400 100% 159,400 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,594 Hmstd. Res. 1,594 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00866566 France126,900 126,900 100% 126,900 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,269 Hmstd. Res. 1,269 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00876566 France159,400 159,400 100% 159,400 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,594 Hmstd. Res. 1,594 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00886566 France126,900 126,900 100% 126,900 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 1,586 Non-H Res. 1,586 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00896566 France229,200 229,200 100% 229,200 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,292 Hmstd. Res. 2,292 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00906566 France235,000 235,000 100% 235,000 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,350 Hmstd. Res. 2,350 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00916566 France178,900 178,900 100% 178,900 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,789 Hmstd. Res. 1,789 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00926566 France187,400 187,400 100% 187,400 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,874 Hmstd. Res. 1,874 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00936566 France178,900 178,900 100% 178,900 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,789 Hmstd. Res. 1,789 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00946566 France192,300 192,300 100% 192,300 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 2,404 Non-H Res. 2,404 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00956566 France224,300 224,300 100% 224,300 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,243 Hmstd. Res. 2,243 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00966566 France235,000 235,000 100% 235,000 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,350 Hmstd. Res. 2,350 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00976566 France164,300 164,300 100% 164,300 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,643 Hmstd. Res. 1,643 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00986566 France122,000 122,000 100% 122,000 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,220 Hmstd. Res. 1,220 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00996566 France159,400 159,400 100% 159,400 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 1,993 Non-H Res. 1,993 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01006566 France122,000 122,000 100% 122,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 1,525 Non-H Res. 1,525 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01016566 France224,300 224,300 100% 224,300 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,243 Hmstd. Res. 2,243 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01026566 France239,900 239,900 100% 239,900 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 2,999 Non-H Res. 2,999 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01036566 France165,700 165,700 100% 165,700 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 2,071 Non-H Res. 2,071 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01046566 France192,300 192,300 100% 192,300 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,923 Hmstd. Res. 1,923 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01056566 France165,700 165,700 100% 165,700 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,657 Hmstd. Res. 1,657 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01066566 France192,300 192,300 100% 192,300 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,923 Hmstd. Res. 1,923 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01076566 France229,200 229,200 100% 229,200 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,292 Hmstd. Res. 2,292 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01086566 France244,800 244,800 100% 244,800 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,448 Hmstd. Res. 2,448 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01096566 France170,600 170,600 100% 170,600 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 2,133 Non-H Res. 2,133 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01106566 France129,400 129,400 100% 129,400 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 1,618 Non-H Res. 1,618 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01116566 France159,400 159,400 100% 159,400 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 1,993 Non-H Res. 1,993 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01126566 France122,000 122,000 100% 122,000 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,220 Hmstd. Res. 1,220 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01136566 France229,200 229,200 100% 229,200 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,292 Hmstd. Res. 2,292 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01146566 France239,900 239,900 100% 239,900 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,399 Hmstd. Res. 2,399 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01156566 France178,900 178,900 100% 178,900 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,789 Hmstd. Res. 1,789 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01166566 France187,400 187,400 100% 187,400 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 2,343 Non-H Res. 2,343 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01176566 France178,900 178,900 100% 178,900 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,789 Hmstd. Res. 1,789 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01186566 France187,400 187,400 100% 187,400 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 2,343 Non-H Res. 2,343 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01196566 France224,300 224,300 100% 224,300 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,243 Hmstd. Res. 2,243 BASE VALUE INFORMATION (Original Tax Capacity) 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01206566 France235,000 235,000 100% 235,000 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,350 Hmstd. Res. 2,350 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01236566 France159,400 159,400 100% 159,400 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,594 Hmstd. Res. 1,594 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01256566 France234,100 234,100 100% 234,100 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,341 Hmstd. Res. 2,341 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01276566 France188,200 188,200 100% 188,200 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,882 Hmstd. Res. 1,882 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01286566 France192,300 192,300 100% 192,300 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,923 Hmstd. Res. 1,923 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01296566 France188,200 188,200 100% 188,200 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,882 Hmstd. Res. 1,882 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01306566 France187,400 187,400 100% 187,400 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,874 Hmstd. Res. 1,874 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01316566 France229,200 229,200 100% 229,200 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,292 Hmstd. Res. 2,292 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01336566 France164,300 164,300 100% 164,300 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,643 Hmstd. Res. 1,643 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01356566 France159,400 159,400 100% 159,400 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 1,993 Non-H Res. 1,993 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01376566 France229,200 229,200 100% 229,200 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 2,865 Non-H Res. 2,865 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01396566 France178,900 178,900 100% 178,900 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 2,236 Non-H Res. 2,236 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01406566 France187,400 187,400 100% 187,400 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,874 Hmstd. Res. 1,874 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01416566 France183,800 183,800 100% 183,800 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,838 Hmstd. Res. 1,838 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01426566 France187,400 187,400 100% 187,400 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 2,343 Non-H Res. 2,343 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01476566 France179,400 179,400 100% 179,400 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,794 Hmstd. Res. 1,794 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01496566 France314,200 314,200 100% 314,200 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 3,928 Non-H Res. 3,928 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01516566 France196,000 196,000 100% 196,000 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,960 Hmstd. Res. 1,960 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01526566 France209,400 209,400 100% 209,400 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 2,618 Non-H Res. 2,618 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01536566 France196,000 196,000 100% 196,000 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 2,450 Non-H Res. 2,450 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01546566 France214,300 214,300 100% 214,300 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,143 Hmstd. Res. 2,143 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01556566 France250,500 250,500 100% 250,500 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,505 Hmstd. Res. 2,505 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01566566 France261,200 261,200 100% 261,200 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,612 Hmstd. Res. 2,612 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01576566 France179,400 179,400 100% 179,400 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 2,243 Non-H Res. 2,243 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01586566 France138,500 138,500 100% 138,500 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,385 Hmstd. Res. 1,385 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01596566 France372,500 372,500 100% 372,500 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 4,656 Non-H Res. 4,656 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01604015 65th Street West3,032,400 8,631,300 11,663,700 100% 11,663,700 Pay 2012 Rental 145,796 Rental 145,796 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01616566 France299,600 299,600 100% 299,600 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,996 Hmstd. Res. 2,996 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01626566 France399,900 399,900 100% 399,900 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 3,999 Hmstd. Res. 3,999 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01636566 France367,600 367,600 100% 367,600 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 4,595 Non-H Res. 4,595 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01646566 France367,600 367,600 100% 367,600 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 3,676 Hmstd. Res. 3,676 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01656566 France272,800 272,800 100% 272,800 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 3,410 Non-H Res. 3,410 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01666566 France367,600 367,600 100% 367,600 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 4,595 Non-H Res. 4,595 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01676566 France414,300 414,300 100% 414,300 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 4,143 Hmstd. Res. 4,143 28030‐028‐24‐14‐01686566 France286,200 286,200 100% 286,200 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 3,578 Non-H Res. 3,578 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00496566 France151,800 151,800 100% 151,800 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,518 Hmstd. Res. 1,518 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00506566 France116,200 116,200 100% 116,200 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,162 Hmstd. Res. 1,162 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00516566 France151,800 151,800 100% 151,800 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,518 Hmstd. Res. 1,518 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00526566 France116,200 116,200 100% 116,200 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,162 Hmstd. Res. 1,162 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00536566 France213,600 213,600 100% 213,600 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,136 Hmstd. Res. 2,136 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00546566 France224,300 224,300 100% 224,300 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,243 Hmstd. Res. 2,243 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00556566 France170,400 170,400 100% 170,400 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,704 Hmstd. Res. 1,704 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00566566 France183,800 183,800 100% 183,800 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 2,298 Non-H Res. 2,298 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00576566 France170,400 170,400 100% 170,400 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,704 Hmstd. Res. 1,704 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00586566 France178,900 178,900 100% 178,900 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,789 Hmstd. Res. 1,789 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00596566 France213,600 213,600 100% 213,600 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,136 Hmstd. Res. 2,136 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00606566 France229,200 229,200 100% 229,200 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,292 Hmstd. Res. 2,292 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00616566 France151,800 151,800 100% 151,800 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 1,898 Non-H Res. 1,898 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00626566 France116,200 116,200 100% 116,200 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 1,453 Non-H Res. 1,453 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00636566 France151,800 151,800 100% 151,800 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 1,898 Non-H Res. 1,898 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00646566 France116,200 116,200 100% 116,200 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,162 Hmstd. Res. 1,162 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00656566 France213,600 213,600 100% 213,600 Pay 2012 Non-H Res. 2,670 Non-H Res. 2,670 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00666566 France229,200 229,200 100% 229,200 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 2,292 Hmstd. Res. 2,292 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00676566 France170,400 170,400 100% 170,400 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,704 Hmstd. Res. 1,704 28030‐028‐24‐14‐00686566 France183,800 183,800 100% 183,800 Pay 2012 Hmstd. Res. 1,838 Hmstd. Res. 1,838 0 100% 0 Pay 2012 - - 107,558,300 124,498,400 232,056,700232,056,700 4,252,730 4,121,297Note:1. Base values are based upon review of County website on 3/7/12 of values assessed 1/2/11 for taxes payable 2012.2. Parcels are located within School district 280 and Watershed District 1 and 3. The tax rate used for this projection is for Watershed 3BASE VALUE INFORMATION (Original Tax Capacity) Southdale Mall Renovation and Mixed Use DevelopmentCity of EdinaSouthdale Mall Renovation and Adjacent DevelopmentEstimated Taxable Total Taxable Property Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage First YearMarket Value Market Value Total Market Tax Project Project Tax Completed Completed Completed Completed Full TaxesArea/Phase New UsePer Sq. Ft./UnitPer Sq. Ft./Unit Sq. Ft./UnitsValue Class Tax Capacity Capacity/Unit2012 2013 2014 2015 PayableMall Retail 125,000,000 125,000,000 1 125,000,000 C/I Pref. 2,499,250 90% 92% 96% 100% 2017Office Office 67,000,000 67,000,000 1 67,000,000 C/I Pref. 1,339,250 90% 92% 95% 100% 201766th & YorkApartments 130,000 130,000 420 54,600,000 Rental 682,500 25% 25% 45% 100% 2017Retail Retail 53,000,000 53,000,000 1 53,000,000 C/I Pref. 1,059,250 93% 96% 98% 100% 2017Condos Condominiums 215,000 197,110 141 27,792,510 Hmstd. Res. 277,925 100% 100% 100% 100% 2014TOTAL327,392,510 5,858,175 Subtotal Residential82,392,510 960,425 Subtotal Commercial/Ind.245,000,000 4,897,750 Note:1. Renovated mall market value based upon tax estimates from mall owner.2. Other developmentvalues based on proposals received by the City of Edina that will increase existing values and estimates from City AssessorTotal Fiscal Local Local Fiscal State-wide MarketTax DisparitiesTax Property DisparitiesPropertyValue TotalNew UseCapacityTax Capacity CapacityTaxes Taxes Taxes Taxes TaxesRetail 2,499,250 868,272 1,630,978 1,865,040 1,232,469 1,299,610 198,250 4,595,368Office 1,339,250 465,273 873,977 999,402 660,432 696,410 106,262 2,462,505Apartments682,500 0 682,500 780,446 0 0 86,596 867,041Retail 1,059,250 367,997 691,253 790,454 522,354 550,810 84,058 1,947,676Condominiums277,925 0 277,925 317,810 0 0 44,079 361,889TOTAL 5,858,175 1,701,542 4,156,633 4,753,151 2,415,254 2,546,830 519,245 10,234,480Note: 1. Taxes and tax increment will vary signficantly from year to year depending upon values, rates, state law, fiscal disparities and other factors which cannot be predicted.2. If tax increment is received in 2013 then the district will be one year shorter.TAX CALCULATIONSPROJECT INFORMATION (Project Tax Capacity) 6/29/2012Base Value Assumptions - Page 1City of EdinaSouthdale Mall Renovation and Adjacent DevelopmentSchool District 280Southdale Mall Renovation and Adjacent DevelopmentProject Original Fiscal Captured LocalAnnual Semi-Annual StateAdmin. Semi-Annual Semi-Annual PERIOD% ofTax Tax Disparities Tax Tax Gross Tax Gross TaxAuditorat Net Tax Present ENDING Tax PaymentOTC CapacityCapacityIncremental CapacityRate Increment Increment 0.36% 10% IncrementValueYrs.YearDate- - - - 08/01/12- - - - 02/01/13- - - - 08/01/13- - - - 02/01/14100% 4,887,371 (4,121,297) (350,521) 415,553 114.351% 475,189 237,594 (855) (23,674) 213,065 186,039 0.5 2014 08/01/14100% 4,887,371 (4,121,297) (350,521) 415,553 114.351% 475,189 237,594 (855) (23,674) 213,065 367,098 1 2014 02/01/15100% 5,007,847 (4,121,297) (392,052) 494,497 114.351% 565,463 282,731 (1,018) (28,171) 253,542 576,788 1.5 2015 08/01/15100% 5,007,847 (4,121,297) (392,052) 494,497 114.351% 565,463 282,731 (1,018) (28,171) 253,542 780,866 2 2015 02/01/16100% 5,294,683 (4,121,297) (444,281) 729,105 114.351% 833,738 416,869 (1,501) (41,537) 373,832 1,073,712 2.5 2016 08/01/16100% 5,294,683 (4,121,297) (444,281) 729,105 114.351% 833,738 416,869 (1,501) (41,537) 373,832 1,358,721 3 2016 02/01/17100% 5,858,175 (4,121,297) (509,635) 1,227,243 114.351% 1,403,364 701,682 (2,526) (69,916) 629,240 1,825,613 3.5 2017 08/01/17100% 5,858,175 (4,121,297) (509,635) 1,227,243 114.351% 1,403,364 701,682 (2,526) (69,916) 629,240 2,280,009 4 2017 02/01/18100% 5,858,175 (4,121,297) (504,487) 1,232,391 114.351% 1,409,252 704,626 (2,537) (70,209) 631,880 2,724,099 4.5 2018 08/01/18100% 5,858,175 (4,121,297) (504,487) 1,232,391 114.351% 1,409,252 704,626 (2,537) (70,209) 631,880 3,156,303 5 2018 02/01/19100% 5,858,175 (4,121,297) (504,487) 1,232,391 114.351% 1,409,252 704,626 (2,537) (70,209) 631,880 3,576,940 5.5 2019 08/01/19100% 5,858,175 (4,121,297) (504,487) 1,232,391 114.351% 1,409,252 704,626 (2,537) (70,209) 631,880 3,986,319 6 2019 02/01/20100% 5,858,175 (4,121,297) (504,487) 1,232,391 114.351% 1,409,252 704,626 (2,537) (70,209) 631,880 4,384,742 6.5 2020 08/01/20100% 5,858,175 (4,121,297) (504,487) 1,232,391 114.351% 1,409,252 704,626 (2,537) (70,209) 631,880 4,772,501 7 2020 02/01/21100% 5,858,175 (4,121,297) (504,487) 1,232,391 114.351% 1,409,252 704,626 (2,537) (70,209) 631,880 5,149,882 7.5 2021 08/01/21100% 5,858,175 (4,121,297) (504,487) 1,232,391 114.351% 1,409,252 704,626 (2,537) (70,209) 631,880 5,517,163 8 2021 02/01/22100% 5,858,175 (4,121,297) (504,487) 1,232,391 114.351% 1,409,252 704,626 (2,537) (70,209) 631,880 5,874,614 8.5 2022 08/01/22100% 5,858,175 (4,121,297) (504,487) 1,232,391 114.351% 1,409,252 704,626 (2,537) (70,209) 631,880 6,222,498 9 2022 02/01/23 Total10,324,014 (37,166) (1,028,685) 9,258,163 Present Value From 02/01/2012 Present Value Rate 5.50% 6,938,866 (24,980) (691,389) 6,222,498 Prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc. - Estimates OnlyN:\Minnsota\EDINA\Housing Economic Redevelopment\TIF\TIF Districts\Southdale 2\TIF Runs\TIF Run Option B SD 280 jc Appendix E Minnesota Business Assistance Form (Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development) A Minnesota Business Assistance Form (MBAF) should be used to report and/or update each calendar year's activity by April 1 of the following year. Please see the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) website at http://www.deed.state.mn.us/Community/subsidies/MBAFForm.htm for information and forms. Appendix E-1 Appendix F Findings Including But/For Qualifications But-For Analysis Current Market Value 489,660,200 New Market Value - Estimate 608,772,510 Difference 119,112,310 Present Value of Tax Increment 7,873,815 Difference 111,238,495 Value Likely to Occur Without TIF is Less Than: 111,238,495 (AS MODIFIED APRIL 5, 2016) The Council hereby reaffirms the original findings for the District, namely that the when the District was established, it was established as an "economic development district" under M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 12, as modified by M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 4c(d). In addition, the City makes the following findings: (a)The TIF Plan Modification conforms to the general plan for development or redevelopment of the City as a whole. The reason for supporting this finding is that the TIF Plan Modification will generally complement and serve to implement policies adopted in the City's comprehensive plan. (b)The TIF Modification will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area by private enterprise. The TIF Plan Modification will allow for the City to establish the 66 West Tax Increment Financing District, and the development activities are necessary so that development and redevelopment by private enterprise can occur within Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. (c)The City reaffirms the original findings of the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District, namely that the development and redevelopment efforts, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and therefor the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. (AS MODIFIED NOVEMBER 20, 2018) The Council hereby reaffirms the original findings for the District, namely that the when the District was established, it was established as an "economic development district" under M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 12, as modified by M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 4c(d). Appendix F-1 In addition, the City makes the following findings: (a)The TIF Plan Modification conforms to the general plan for development or redevelopment of the City as a whole. The reason for supporting this finding is that the TIF Plan Modification will generally complement and serve to implement policies adopted in the City's comprehensive plan. (b)The TIF Modification will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area by private enterprise. The TIF Plan Modification will allow for the City to establish the 66 West Tax Increment Financing District and support additional affordable housing activities as authorized under Minnesota Session Laws 2014, Chapter 308, HF No. 3167, Article 6, Sec. 8 and Minnesota Session Laws 2017, Chapter 1, HF No. 1, Article 6, Sec. 11, and the development activities are necessary so that development and redevelopment by private enterprise can occur within Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. (c)The City reaffirms the original findings of the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District, namely that the development and redevelopment efforts, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and therefor the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. (AS MODIFIED DECEMBER 17, 2019) The Council hereby reaffirms the original findings for the District, namely that the when the District was established, it was established as an "economic development district" under M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 12, as modified by M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 4c(d). In addition, the City makes the following findings: (a)The TIF Plan Modification conforms to the general plan for development or redevelopment of the City as a whole. The reason for supporting this finding is that the TIF Plan Modification will generally complement and serve to implement policies adopted in the City's comprehensive plan. (b)The TIF Modification will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area by private enterprise. The TIF Plan Modification will allow for the City to support additional affordable housing activities as authorized under Minnesota Session Laws 2014, Chapter 308, HF No. 3167, Article 6, Sec. 8 as amended by Minnesota Session Laws 2017, Chapter 1, HF No. 1, Article 6, Sec. 11 and Minnesota Session Laws 2019, First Special Session, Chapter 6, Article 7, Sec. 3, and the development activities are necessary so that development and redevelopment by private enterprise can occur within Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. (c)The City reaffirms the original findings of the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District, namely that the development and redevelopment efforts, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and therefor the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. Appendix F-2 Appendix G Prior Improvements The complete list of permits issued are on file with the City Planner Appendix G-1 Appendix H Special Legislation Minnesota Session Laws – 2019, 1st Special Session Chapter 6 – HF No. 5, Article 7 Sec. 3. Laws 2014, chapter 308, article 6, section 8, subdivision 1, as amended by Laws 2017, First Special Session chapter 1, article 6, section 11, is amended to read: Subdivision 1. Authority to create districts. (a) The governing body of the city of Edina or its development authority may establish one or more tax increment financing housing districts in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, as the boundaries exist on March 31, 2014. (b) The authority to request certification of districts under this section expires on December 31, 2019 2021. EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day after the governing body of the city of Edina and its chief clerical officer comply with Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021, subdivisions 2 and 3. Minnesota Session Laws – 2017, 1st Special Session Chapter 1 – HF No. 1, Article 6 Sec. 11. Laws 2014, chapter 308, article 6, section 8, subdivision 1, is amended to read: Subdivision 1. Authority to create districts. (a) The governing body of the city of Edina or its development authority may establish one or more tax increment financing housing districts in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, as the boundaries exist on March 31, 2014. (b) The authority to request certification of districts under this section expires on June 30, 2017 December 31, 2019. EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day after the governing body of the city of Edina and its chief clerical officer comply with Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021, subdivisions 2 and 3. Sec. 16. CITY OF EDINA; APPROVAL OF 2014 SPECIAL LAW. Notwithstanding the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021, subdivision 3, the chief clerical officer of the city of Edina may file with the secretary of state certificate of approval of Laws 2014, chapter 308, article 6, section 8, by December 31, 2016, and, if the certificate is so filed and the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021, subdivision 3, are otherwise complied with, the special law is deemed approved, and all actions taken by the city before the effective date of this section in reliance on Laws 2014, chapter 308, article 6, section 8, are deemed consistent with Laws 2014, chapter 308, article 6, section 8, and this act. Appendix H-1 EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment. Minnesota Session Laws - 2014, Regular Session Chapter 308--HF No. 3167, Article 6 Sec. 8. CITY OF EDINA; TAX INCREMENT FINANCING. Subdivision 1. Authority to create districts. (a) The governing body of the city of Edina or its development authority may establish one or more tax increment financing housing districts in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, as the boundaries exist on March 31, 2014. (b) The authority to request certification of districts under this section expires on June 30, 2017. Subd. 2. Rules governing districts. (a) Housing districts established under this section are subject to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, sections 469.174 to 469.1794, except as otherwise provided in this subdivision. (b) Notwithstanding the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, section 469.176, subdivision 1b, no increment must be paid to the authority after 20 years after receipt by the authority of the first increment from a district established under this section. (c) Notwithstanding the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, section 469.1761, subdivision 3, for a residential rental project, the city may elect to substitute "20 percent" for "40 percent" in the 40-60 test under section 142(d)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code in determining the applicable income limits. (d) The provisions of Minnesota Statutes, section 469.1761, subdivision 3, apply for a 25- year period beginning on the date of certification of the district. Subd. 3. Pooling authority. The city may elect to treat expenditures of increment from the Southdale 2 district for a housing project of a district established under this section as expenditures qualifying under Minnesota Statutes, section 469.1763, subdivision 2, paragraph (d): (1) without regard to whether the housing meets the requirement of a qualified building under section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code; and (2) may increase by an additional 25 percentage points the permitted amount of expenditures for activities located outside the geographic area of the district permitted under that section. EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective upon compliance by the governing body of the city of Edina with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021, subdivisions 2 and 3. Appendix H-2 Appendix I Housing Qualifications for the District In meeting the criteria of Minnesota Session Laws 2019, First Special Session, Chapter 6, HF No. 5, Article 7, at least 20% of the units will be occupied by person with incomes less than 60% of median income. Income Restrictions- Adjusted for Family Size (Housing District) - Hennepin County Hennepin County Median Family Income: $100,000 No. of Persons 60% of Median Income 1-person $42,000 2-person $48,000 3-person $54,000 4-person $60,000 Source: Department of Housing and Urban Development and Minnesota Housing Finance Agency ***PLEASE NOTE: THESE NUMBERS ARE ADJUSTED ANNUALLY. ALL INCOME FIGURES REPORTED ON THIS PAGE ARE FOR 2019. Appendix F-4 Survey Responses 30 January 2019 - 13 September 2021 Public Hearing Comments- Modification #4to the Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Plan Better Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: Southdale 2 TIF Plan- Proposed Modification #4 VISITORS 2 CONTRIBUTORS 1 RESPONSES 1 1 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous 1 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Roberta C Email:emailfrbtwebsite@gmail.co m Responded At:Sep 13, 2021 09:58:10 am Last Seen:Sep 13, 2021 16:52:32 pm IP Address:63.231.154.85 Q1.First and Last Name Roberta Castellano Q2.Address 4854 France Ave S Q3.Comment I think TIF is utilized too much, which leads to such things as project bloat and over-ask, syphoning wealth from the many to give to the few, and even in the case of affordable housing, can make Edina less affordable to those of modest means. The CITY ofEDINA Modification #4 to Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing Plan Public Hearing September 9, 2021 www.EdinaMN.gov The CITY ofEDINA 2 The Great Recession of 2008 accelerated the decline of the shopping mall and many surrounding parcels TIF District established in 2011 to encourage redevelopment, job creation and reinvestment 8-year Economic Development TIF District Background Declining Retail Area The CITY ofEDINA 3 Background Declining Retail Area 197 M 118 M 3.9 M 2.2 M 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Southdale Mall Economic Decline Pre-TIF Tax Capacity Estimated Market Value The CITY ofEDINA 4 Progress and Growth 197 M 119 M 221 M 3.9 M 2.2 M 4.0 M 0 50,000,000 100,000,000 150,000,000 200,000,000 250,000,000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Southdale Mall Economic Decline (Pre-TIF) and Growth (Post-TIF) Estimated Market Value Tax Capacity The CITY ofEDINA 5 18 Redevelopment Projects in TIF District since 2012 N E W •PLUS many tenant remodels •AND more anticipated in future The CITY ofEDINA 6 The CITY ofEDINA Project Est. Cost Taco Bell $800k ($0 TIF) Aria Apartments $34.8M ($0 TIF) Onyx Apartments $44.9M ($0 TIF) Millennium Apartments $45.5M ($0 TIF) Bank of America $4.3M ($0 TIF) Aurora on France Senior $42.3M ($0 TIF) 6565 Medical Office $19.6M ($0 TIF) 6565 Medical Parking $12M ($0 TIF) Project Est. Cost Southdale Center $45M ($5 TIF) One Southdale Apartments $36M ($0 TIF) Homewood Suites $14.4M ($0 TIF) Shake Shack $1.8M ($0 TIF) Metro Transit Center $875k ($0 TIF) RH Gallery $15M ($0 TIF) Lifetime Fitness $26.5M ($0 TIF) Lifetime Sport & Work $16.5M ($0 TIF) Galleria East Expansion $22M ($0 TIF) Shoppes at Estelle $2.8M ($0 TIF) Additional investment was made in remodeling several offices and retail facilities ($0 TIF) 7 The CITY ofEDINA 8 TIF for affordable housing in Edina Project Name TIF Amount 66 West Apartments $250,000 Sound on 76th Apartments $2,400,000 Amundson Apartments $700,000 4040 70th Senior Apartments $3,650,000 Metro HRA single family $2,000,000 Villa Nova NOAH $350,000 Total To Date = $9,350,000 The CITY ofEDINA •Economic development financing tool used throughout U.S. •Governed by Minnesota Statute •Enabled by City Council •“Tax Increment” Financing - uses growth in tax base to fund private investment and public infrastructure 9 What is TIF? Availability of Property Taxes to Taxing Agencies “Incremental Taxes” Remain in TIF District Original + Market Value Taxes Available to All Agencies Original + Incremental Taxes Available to All Agencies Year 1 Year 8 Year 40+ The CITY ofEDINA 10 TIF in Edina is used on a limited Basis and to a lesser extent than Neighboring Cities TIF in Edina The CITY ofEDINA 11 TIF in Edina Note: These percentages will be reduced when the 209-acre Southdale 2 District decertifies in Dec. 2021. Total Size of 10 TIF Districts = 2.8% Area of City without TIF designation 97.2% City of Edina 10,225 Total Acres Source: City of Edina The CITY ofEDINA 12 Proposed Budget Modification The CITY ofEDINA 13 Proposed Budget Modification No Other Changes •Boundaries –unchanged •Decertification date –unchanged •Purpose –unchanged •Intended outcome -unchanged The CITY ofEDINAPublic Hearing -Community Outreach www.EdinaMN.gov 14 Notice provided to Hennepin County, Edina Public Schools & Richfield Public Schools Notice of the Public Hearing was posted in Better Together Edina. Public Hearing notice also posted in the Sun Current. The CITY ofEDINA 15 Staff Recommendation Upon completion of Public Hearing, staff recommends the City Council approve Modification #4 to the Southdale 2TIF Plan Staff and Financial Advisor available for questions, Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: From:Scott H. Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-77: Adopting the Proposed Budget and Establishing the Proposed Tax Levy Payable in 2022 CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2021-77 adopting the Proposed Budget and establishing the P roposed Tax Levy Payable in 2022. INTRODUCTION: M.S. 275.065 requires that the City adopt a proposed budget and levy and certify the proposed levy to the county auditor by September 30. The county auditor will use this information to prepare and send parcel specific notices between November 11 to 24. T he City is also required to certify the final property tax levy to the county by December 27, 2021. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-77 Staff Report 2022-2023 Proposed Budget 2022-2023 Budget Workplan (draft) Staff Presentation RESOLUTION NO. 2021-77 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE PROPOSED BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF EDINA FOR YEAR 2022, AND ESTABLISHING THE PROPOSED TAX LEVY PAYABLE IN 2022 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That there is proposed to be levied upon all taxable real and personal property in the City of Edina, a tax rate sufficient to produce the amount as follows: FOR GENERAL FUND $36,708,036 FOR CONSTRUCTION FUND $5,190,000 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF CIP PLAN BONDS – SERIES 2016A (Fire) $403,000 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF CIP PLAN BONDS – SERIES 2017C (PW) $1,038,000 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF CIP PLAN BONDS – SERIES 2013A (PW) $451,000 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF HRA PUBLIC PROJECT BONDS – SERIES 2009A (PW) $205,000 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF HRA PUBLIC PROJECT BONDS – SERIES 2014 (Dome) $1,168,000 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF HRA PUBLIC PROJECT BONDS – SERIES 2015A (Gym) $392,000 TOTAL TAX CAPACITY LEVY $45,555,036 Section 2. That the preliminary 2022 budget for the City of Edina is as follows: TOTAL REVENUES – GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS $79,653,402 TOTAL EXPENDITURES – GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS $80,440,270 TOTAL REVENUES – ENTERPRISE FUNDS $55,911,043 TOTAL EXPENDITURES – ENTERPRISE FUNDS $53,126,044 TOTAL REVENUES – INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS $ 6,771,778 TOTAL EXPENDITURES – INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS $ 6,771,778 Section 3. That the preliminary 2022 budget and tax levy incorporates revisions to the scheduled levy for the Series 2019A General Obligation Bonds (Fire Equipment) due to sufficient funds available to pay the required debt service. Approved this 21st day of September 2021. Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 21, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of __________, 20___. _______________________________ City Clerk September 21,2021 Mayor and City Council Scott Neal, City Manager Resolution No. 2021-77: Adopting the Proposed Budget and Establishing the Proposed Tax Levy Payable in 2022 Information / Background: The City Council will consider the City Manager’s proposed Budget and Preliminary Tax Levy at the September 21, 2021, meeting. This budget is the result of an extensive process that begins in early spring and includes several meetings among staff and City Council work sessions. A preliminary tax levy of $45,792,336 is proposed in support of the 2022 budget. This is an increase of $450,000 over the levy that was presented to the Council at their work session on August 17. The reason for this change was to provide some budgetary flexibility as staff continues to evaluate position needs in city- wide departments. Staff intends to bring a final levy to the Council in December closer to what was proposed on August 17. New in 2022, the City will begin to levy for street reconstruction costs rather than specially assess benefitting property owners. This decision was arrived at after several years of discussion on this topic followed by a recent report and recommendation from the Street Reconstruction Task Force to change the way street reconstruction is paid for. The financing plan approved by the Council included an initial levy of $950,000 and a 15-year transition to a levy of $4.5 million (adjusted annually for inflation). This levy represents 2.26% of the overall levy. This preliminary levy represents an increase of 8.98% over the 2021 Total Tax Levy. For 2022, the median value home has increased by 3.7% to $571,800 from $551,300 in 2021. The impact of the proposed 2022 levy on the median value home is +5.98%, or $97 per year. The preliminary levy includes: 1. General Fund Operations - $36,708,036 2. Debt Service - $3,657,000 3. Construction Fund - $5,190,000 The HRA adopted a preliminary tax levy of $237,300 at their meeting on September 9 which is included in the total. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2021-77. CITY OF EDINA Proposed Tax Levies Budget Budget 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 General Fund Levies General Operating Levy 30,009,121$ 32,021,243$ 33,986,471$ 36,708,036$ 38,947,298$ General Fund Subtotal 30,009,121 32,021,243 33,986,471 36,708,036 38,947,298 Increase From Prior Year (%)5.32%6.71%6.14%8.01%6.10% Arts and Culture Fund Levies Arts and Culture 20,000 20,000 20,000 - - Arts and Culture Fund Subtotal 20,000 20,000 20,000 - - Increase From Prior Year (%)0.00%0.00%0.00%-100.00%0.00% Debt Service Fund Levies City Hall Debt Service 952,000 952,000 - - - Gymnasium Debt Service 390,000 391,000 392,000 392,000 392,000 Fire Station Debt Service 406,000 402,000 402,000 403,000 403,000 Public Works Facility Debt Service 1,695,000 1,688,000 1,695,000 1,694,000 1,692,000 Sports Dome 1,168,900 1,163,300 1,162,400 1,168,000 1,166,000 Debt Service Fund Subtotal 4,611,900 4,596,300 3,651,400 3,657,000 3,653,000 Increase From Prior Year (%)0.70%-0.34%-20.56%0.15%-0.11% Construction Fund Levies Capital Improvement Plan Levy 300,000 800,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Equipment Levy 1,930,000 2,030,000 2,130,000 2,240,000 2,350,000 Street Reconstruction Levy - - - 950,000 1,210,400 Weber Woods NOTE 1 400,000 - - - - Construction Fund Subtotal 2,630,000 2,830,000 4,130,000 5,190,000 5,560,400 Increase From Prior Year (%)2.45%7.60%45.94%25.67%7.14% HRA Fund Levies HRA Operating Levy 160,000 192,000 230,400 237,300 244,400 HRA Fund Subtotal 160,000 192,000 230,400 237,300 244,400 Increase From Prior Year (%)28.00%20.00%20.00%2.99%2.99% Total Property Tax Levy 37,431,021$ 39,659,543$ 42,018,271$ 45,792,336$ 48,405,098$ Increase From Prior Year (%)4.60%5.95%5.95%8.98%5.71% NOTE 1:Repayment of Construction Fund reserves used to purchase a portion of Weber Woods from the City of Minneapolis In 2016. G:\Budget and CIP\2022 Budget\Budget Book\Financials\2022 Summary charts.xlsx 9/17/2021 CITY OF EDINA Consolidated Proposed Budget 2020 2021 2022 2023 Actual Budget Budget Budget REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property tax levy 39,509,239$ 42,018,271$ 45,792,336$ 8.98%48,405,098$ 5.71% Tax increments 6,452,819 7,969,700 1,670,245 -79.04%1,723,245 3.17% Franchise fees & other taxes 3,079,705 3,182,000 3,120,000 -1.95%3,120,000 0.00% Special assessments 4,629,551 4,281,222 4,624,553 8.02%3,726,253 -19.42% Licenses and permits 6,454,749 5,258,514 5,464,560 3.92%5,540,160 1.38% Intergovernmental 11,758,668 2,888,218 6,120,309 111.91%4,700,100 -23.20% Charges for services 4,968,288 5,636,930 5,932,905 5.25%6,140,291 3.50% Fines and forfeitures 485,472 950,000 650,000 -31.58%650,000 0.00% Operating revenue 45,508,128 52,586,578 54,252,493 3.17%56,340,116 3.85% Investment income 2,781,450 1,039,925 1,036,000 -0.38%1,036,000 0.00% Other revenue 3,731,363 726,761 575,561 -20.80%575,561 0.00% Debt issued 2,025,176 3,144,387 1,768,370 -43.76%2,813,402 59.10% Other financing sources 151,595 28,135 250,000 788.57%- -100.00% TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 131,536,203 129,710,641 131,257,332 1.19%134,770,226 2.68% EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY DEPARTMENT Administration 2,350,260 2,379,841 2,687,914 12.95%2,733,209 1.69% Communications 1,255,366 1,495,409 1,831,123 22.45%1,708,270 -6.71% Information technology 104,253 - 50,000 NA 30,000 -40.00% Human resources 1,118,151 1,317,285 1,462,677 11.04%1,524,380 4.22% Finance 2,083,434 1,575,228 2,448,241 55.42%2,505,646 2.34% Public works 27,584,362 27,703,662 26,205,413 -5.41%27,109,867 3.45% Engineering 8,322,433 9,655,062 15,883,997 64.51%17,004,553 7.05% Police 15,295,562 17,743,443 16,506,498 -6.97%17,544,204 6.29% Fire 14,182,094 10,752,843 12,223,252 13.67%12,797,216 4.70% Parks & recreation 27,990,679 32,255,486 36,084,058 11.87%36,670,186 1.62% Community development 5,295,770 8,427,743 7,051,823 -16.33%4,746,261 -32.69% Debt service 7,872,730 7,287,877 6,710,755 -7.92%6,888,602 2.65% TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 113,455,094 120,593,879 129,145,751 7.09%131,262,394 1.64% EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Cost of goods sold 8,946,340 10,218,869 11,027,161 7.91%11,414,891 3.52% Personal services 41,718,816 45,333,488 48,476,863 6.93%50,483,745 4.14% Contractual services 21,433,776 22,130,672 27,811,386 25.67%26,048,451 -6.34% Commodities 4,180,993 4,696,946 4,814,041 2.49%4,844,672 0.64% Internal services 6,872,260 7,436,487 8,258,460 11.05%8,482,188 2.71% Equipment 3,624,078 2,495,960 1,728,550 -30.75%1,936,665 12.04% Capital outlay 9,421,171 11,426,741 10,856,385 -4.99%11,452,603 5.49% Depreciation 8,339,446 8,466,500 8,790,000 3.82%8,985,000 2.22% Debt service 8,918,214 8,388,216 7,382,905 -11.98%7,614,179 3.13% TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 113,455,094 120,593,879 129,145,751 7.09%131,262,394 1.64% CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION 18,081,109 9,116,762 2,111,581 3,507,832 FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION - JANUARY 1 183,410,422 201,491,531 210,608,293 212,719,874 FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION - DECEMBER 31 201,491,531$ 210,608,293$ 212,719,874$ 216,227,706$ 9/17/2021 CITY OF EDINA Proposed Budget by Fund Type Governmental Enterprise Internal Service Governmental Enterprise Internal Service Funds Funds Funds Total Funds Funds Funds Total REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property tax levy 45,792,336$ -$ -$ 45,792,336$ 48,405,098$ -$ -$ 48,405,098$ Tax increments 1,670,245 - - 1,670,245 1,723,245 - - 1,723,245 Franchise fees & other taxes 3,120,000 - - 3,120,000 3,120,000 - - 3,120,000 Special assessments 4,624,553 - - 4,624,553 3,726,253 - - 3,726,253 Licenses and permits 5,464,560 - - 5,464,560 5,540,160 - - 5,540,160 Intergovernmental 5,940,309 180,000 - 6,120,309 4,520,100 180,000 - 4,700,100 Charges for services 5,932,905 - - 5,932,905 6,140,291 - - 6,140,291 Fines and forfeitures 650,000 - - 650,000 650,000 - - 650,000 Operating revenue - 54,139,043 6,885,228 61,024,271 - 56,223,559 7,050,216 63,273,775 Investment income 655,000 381,000 - 1,036,000 655,000 381,000 - 1,036,000 Other revenue 555,561 20,000 - 575,561 555,561 20,000 - 575,561 Contributions - - - - - - - - Transfers 3,229,563 1,191,000 - 4,420,563 3,074,252 1,203,350 - 4,277,602 Loan received - - - - - - - - Debt issued 1,768,370 - - 1,768,370 2,813,402 - - 2,813,402 Other financing sources 250,000 - - 250,000 - - - - TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 79,653,402 55,911,043 6,885,228 142,449,673 80,923,362 58,007,909 7,050,216 145,981,487 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY FUNCTION Administration 2,687,914 - - 2,687,914 2,733,209 - - 2,733,209 Communications 1,831,123 - - 1,831,123 1,708,270 - - 1,708,270 Information technology 50,000 - 2,347,413 2,397,413 30,000 - 2,431,535 2,461,535 Human resources 1,462,677 - 1,101,903 2,564,580 1,524,380 - 1,107,234 2,631,614 Finance 2,038,960 409,281 - 2,448,241 2,093,678 411,968 - 2,505,646 Public works 6,579,412 19,626,001 1,966,101 28,171,514 6,748,154 20,361,713 2,015,368 29,125,235 Engineering 14,521,487 1,362,510 1,356,361 17,240,358 15,709,034 1,295,519 1,379,522 18,384,075 Police 14,762,227 1,744,271 - 16,506,498 15,768,843 1,775,361 - 17,544,204 Fire 12,223,252 - - 12,223,252 12,797,216 - - 12,797,216 Parks & recreation 7,541,077 28,542,981 - 36,084,058 7,397,816 29,272,370 - 36,670,186 Community development 7,051,823 - - 7,051,823 4,746,261 - - 4,746,261 Loan issued - - - - - - - - Debt service 6,710,755 - - 6,710,755 6,888,602 - - 6,888,602 Transfers 2,979,563 1,441,000 - 4,420,563 2,816,752 1,460,850 - 4,277,602 TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 80,440,270 53,126,044 6,771,778 140,338,092 80,962,215 54,577,781 6,933,659 142,473,655 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Cost of goods sold - 11,027,161 - 11,027,161 - 11,414,891 - 11,414,891 Personal services 37,001,785 11,475,078 2,784,878 51,261,741 38,534,559 11,949,186 2,921,059 53,404,804 Contractual services 13,412,281 14,399,105 2,619,000 30,430,386 11,408,840 14,639,611 2,627,000 28,675,451 Commodities 2,475,391 2,338,650 1,222,900 6,036,941 2,523,822 2,320,850 1,235,600 6,080,272 Internal services 5,275,560 2,982,900 - 8,258,460 5,400,372 3,081,816 - 8,482,188 Equipment 1,728,550 - - 1,728,550 1,936,665 - - 1,936,665 Capital outlay 10,856,385 - 145,000 11,001,385 11,452,603 - 150,000 11,602,603 Depreciation - 8,790,000 - 8,790,000 - 8,985,000 - 8,985,000 Loan issued - - - - - - - - Debt service 6,710,755 672,150 - 7,382,905 6,888,602 725,577 - 7,614,179 Other expense - - - - - - - - Contributions - - - - - - - - Transfers 2,979,563 1,441,000 - 4,420,563 2,816,752 1,460,850 - 4,277,602 TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 80,440,270 53,126,044 6,771,778 140,338,092 80,962,215 54,577,781 6,933,659 142,473,655 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION (786,868) 2,784,999 113,450 2,111,581 (38,853) 3,430,128 116,557 3,507,832 FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION - JANUARY 1 87,461,014 120,309,380 2,837,899 210,608,293 86,674,146 123,094,379 2,951,349 212,719,874 FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION - DECEMBER 31 86,674,146$ 123,094,379$ 2,951,349$ 212,719,874$ 86,635,293$ 126,524,507$ 3,067,906$ 216,227,706$ 2022 Budget 2023 Budget 9/17/2021 CITY OF EDINA Proposed Governmental Fund Budgets Braemar Debt General HRA PACS CAS CDBG Police SR Memorial Service Construction Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property tax levy 36,708,036$ 237,300$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,657,000$ 5,190,000$ 45,792,336$ Tax increments - 1,670,245 - - - - - - - 1,670,245 Franchise fees & other taxes 830,000 - 1,200,000 1,000,000 - - - - 90,000 3,120,000 Special assessments - - - - - - - - 4,624,553 4,624,553 Licenses and permits 5,391,060 - - - - - - - 73,500 5,464,560 Intergovernmental 1,888,750 - - - 135,000 - - - 3,916,559 5,940,309 Charges for services 5,737,905 - - - - - - - 195,000 5,932,905 Fines and forfeitures 650,000 - - - - - - - - 650,000 Investment income 250,000 186,000 - 15,000 - - 1,000 - 203,000 655,000 Other revenue 376,000 - - - - 177,061 2,500 - - 555,561 Transfers and contributions 150,000 - - - - - - 2,979,563 100,000 3,229,563 Debt issued - - - - - - - - 1,768,370 1,768,370 Other financing sources 250,000 - - - - - - - - 250,000 TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 52,231,751 2,093,545 1,200,000 1,015,000 135,000 177,061 3,500 6,636,563 16,160,982 79,653,402 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY DEPARTMENT Administration 2,621,914 - - - - - - - 66,000 2,687,914 Communications 1,526,123 - - - - - - - 305,000 1,831,123 Information technology - - - - - - - - 50,000 50,000 Human resources 1,462,677 - - - - - - - - 1,462,677 Finance 2,038,960 - - - - - - - - 2,038,960 Public works 6,044,412 - - - - - - - 535,000 6,579,412 Engineering 3,666,522 - 1,252,043 752,352 - - - - 8,850,570 14,521,487 Police 14,203,777 - - - - 111,900 - - 446,550 14,762,227 Fire 11,968,252 - - - - - - - 255,000 12,223,252 Parks & recreation 6,562,077 - - - - - 1,000 - 978,000 7,541,077 Community development 2,137,037 4,704,786 - - 135,000 - - - 75,000 7,051,823 Debt service - 133,967 - - - - - 6,576,788 - 6,710,755 Transfers - - - - - - - - 2,979,563 2,979,563 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 52,231,751 4,838,753 1,252,043 752,352 135,000 111,900 1,000 6,576,788 14,540,683 80,440,270 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Personal services 36,425,453 197,566 124,371 145,820 - - - - 108,575 37,001,785 Contractual services 8,151,850 4,504,220 75,720 96,020 135,000 108,400 1,000 - 340,071 13,412,281 Commodities 2,398,016 3,000 13,000 1,200 - 3,500 - - 56,675 2,475,391 Internal services 5,256,432 - 8,952 9,312 - - - - 864 5,275,560 Equipment - - - - - - - - 1,728,550 1,728,550 Capital outlay - - 1,030,000 500,000 - - - - 9,326,385 10,856,385 Debt service - 133,967 - - - - - 6,576,788 - 6,710,755 Transfers - - - - - - - - 2,979,563 2,979,563 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 52,231,751 4,838,753 1,252,043 752,352 135,000 111,900 1,000 6,576,788 14,540,683 80,440,270 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE -$ (2,745,208)$ (52,043)$ 262,648$ -$ 65,161$ 2,500$ 59,775$ 1,620,299$ (786,868)$ 2022 GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS 9/17/2021 CITY OF EDINA Proposed Governmental Fund Budgets Braemar Debt General HRA PACS CAS CDBG Police SR Memorial Service Construction Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property tax levy 38,947,298$ 244,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,653,000$ 5,560,400$ 48,405,098$ Tax increments - 1,723,245 - - - - - - - 1,723,245 Franchise fees & other taxes 830,000 - 1,200,000 1,000,000 - - - - 90,000 3,120,000 Special assessments - - - - - - - - 3,726,253 3,726,253 Licenses and permits 5,466,160 - - - - - - - 74,000 5,540,160 Intergovernmental 1,605,100 - - - 135,000 - - - 2,780,000 4,520,100 Charges for services 5,945,291 - - - - - - - 195,000 6,140,291 Fines and forfeitures 650,000 - - - - - - - - 650,000 Investment income 250,000 186,000 - 15,000 - - 1,000 - 203,000 655,000 Other revenue 376,000 - - - - 177,061 2,500 - - 555,561 Transfers and contributions 157,500 - - - - - - 2,816,752 100,000 3,074,252 Debt issued - - - - - - - - 2,813,402 2,813,402 Other financing sources - - - - - - - - - - TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 54,227,349 2,153,645 1,200,000 1,015,000 135,000 177,061 3,500 6,469,752 15,542,055 80,923,362 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY DEPARTMENT Administration 2,667,209 - - - - - - - 66,000 2,733,209 Communications 1,595,270 - - - - - - - 113,000 1,708,270 Information technology - - - - - - - - 30,000 30,000 Human resources 1,524,380 - - - - - - - - 1,524,380 Finance 2,093,678 - - - - - - - - 2,093,678 Public works 6,187,364 - - - - - - - 560,790 6,748,154 Engineering 3,876,589 - 1,257,383 732,556 - - - - 9,842,506 15,709,034 Police 14,846,293 - - - - 113,000 - - 809,550 15,768,843 Fire 12,475,216 - - - - - - - 322,000 12,797,216 Parks & recreation 6,755,491 - - - - - 1,000 - 641,325 7,397,816 Community development 2,205,859 2,405,402 - - 135,000 - - - - 4,746,261 Debt service - 472,250 - - - - - 6,416,352 - 6,888,602 Transfers - - - - - - - - 2,816,752 2,816,752 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 54,227,349 2,877,652 1,257,383 732,556 135,000 113,000 1,000 6,416,352 15,201,923 80,962,215 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Personal services 37,928,161 204,932 129,399 155,688 - - - - 116,379 38,534,559 Contractual services 8,473,857 2,197,470 75,720 66,020 135,000 109,500 1,000 - 350,273 11,408,840 Commodities 2,444,747 3,000 13,000 1,200 - 3,500 - - 58,375 2,523,822 Internal services 5,380,584 - 9,264 9,648 - - - - 876 5,400,372 Equipment - - - - - - - - 1,936,665 1,936,665 Capital outlay - - 1,030,000 500,000 - - - - 9,922,603 11,452,603 Debt service - 472,250 - - - - - 6,416,352 - 6,888,602 Transfers - - - - - - - - 2,816,752 2,816,752 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 54,227,349 2,877,652 1,257,383 732,556 135,000 113,000 1,000 6,416,352 15,201,923 80,962,215 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE -$ (724,007)$ (57,383)$ 282,444$ -$ 64,061$ 2,500$ 53,400$ 340,132$ (38,853)$ 2023 GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS 9/17/2021 CITY OF EDINA Proposed Enterprise Fund Budgets Aquatic Golf Sports Art Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Dome Center Edinborough Centennial Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN Operating revenues 27,605,752$ 15,112,595$ 1,059,070$ 4,511,500$ 2,632,739$ 510,000$ 502,483$ 1,388,904$ 816,000$ 54,139,043$ Intergovernmental 180,000 - - - - - - - - 180,000 Investment income 302,000 21,000 20,000 9,000 3,000 11,000 - 11,000 4,000 381,000 Other revenue 20,000 - - - - - - - - 20,000 Transfers and contributions - 3,500 15,000 50,550 340,000 950 350,000 11,000 420,000 1,191,000 TOTAL REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN 28,107,752 15,137,095 1,094,070 4,571,050 2,975,739 521,950 852,483 1,410,904 1,240,000 55,911,043 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY DEPARTMENT Finance 409,281 - - - - - - - - 409,281 Public works 19,626,001 - - - - - - - - 19,626,001 Engineering 1,362,510 - - - - - - - - 1,362,510 Fire 1,744,271 - - - - - - - - 1,744,271 Parks and recreation - 14,229,249 1,232,909 4,638,196 3,473,576 922,365 842,935 1,821,317 1,382,434 28,542,981 Transfers and contributions 441,000 1,000,000 - - - - - - - 1,441,000 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT 23,583,063 15,229,249 1,232,909 4,638,196 3,473,576 922,365 842,935 1,821,317 1,382,434 53,126,044 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY TYPE COGS - 10,582,911 51,750 191,000 111,000 - 500 78,000 12,000 11,027,161 Personal services 2,996,962 2,373,276 518,515 1,960,542 1,204,319 145,293 582,296 910,139 783,736 11,475,078 Contractual services 10,828,317 680,474 190,509 671,500 1,062,622 202,070 114,819 371,476 277,318 14,399,105 Commodities 1,190,500 76,300 132,600 390,000 134,250 23,250 76,500 171,750 143,500 2,338,650 Internal services 1,599,936 399,288 42,096 324,900 237,276 37,752 62,820 149,952 128,880 2,982,900 Depreciation 6,127,000 117,000 290,000 899,000 660,000 514,000 6,000 140,000 37,000 8,790,000 Interest 399,348 - 7,439 201,254 64,109 - - - - 672,150 Transfers and contributions 441,000 1,000,000 - - - - - - - 1,441,000 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT 23,583,063 15,229,249 1,232,909 4,638,196 3,473,576 922,365 842,935 1,821,317 1,382,434 53,126,044 CHANGE IN NET POSITION 4,524,689$ (92,154)$ (138,839)$ (67,146)$ (497,837)$ (400,415)$ 9,548$ (410,413)$ (142,434)$ 2,784,999$ 2022 ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS 9/17/2021 CITY OF EDINA Proposed Enterprise Fund Budgets Aquatic Golf Sports Art Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Dome Center Edinborough Centennial Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN Operating revenues 28,979,624$ 15,665,239$ 1,089,070$ 4,562,500$ 2,642,739 560,000$ 502,483$ 1,388,904$ 833,000$ 56,223,559$ Intergovernmental 180,000 - - - - - - - - 180,000 Investment income 302,000 21,000 20,000 9,000 3,000 11,000 - 11,000 4,000 381,000 Other revenue 20,000 - - - - - - - - 20,000 Transfers and contributions - 3,750 16,000 53,600 392,000 1,000 300,000 12,000 425,000 1,203,350 TOTAL REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN 29,481,624 15,689,989 1,125,070 4,625,100 3,037,739 572,000 802,483 1,411,904 1,262,000 58,007,909 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY DEPARTMENT Finance 411,968 - - - - - - - - 411,968 Public works 20,361,713 - - - - - - - - 20,361,713 Engineering 1,295,519 - - - - - - - - 1,295,519 Fire 1,775,361 - - - - - - - - 1,775,361 Parks and recreation - 14,741,071 1,228,066 4,722,941 3,476,941 940,033 867,604 1,863,099 1,432,615 29,272,370 Transfers and contributions 460,850 1,000,000 - - - - - - - 1,460,850 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT 24,305,411 15,741,071 1,228,066 4,722,941 3,476,941 940,033 867,604 1,863,099 1,432,615 54,577,781 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY TYPE COGS - 10,970,141 52,250 191,000 111,000 - 500 78,000 12,000 11,414,891 Personal services 3,113,700 2,490,550 532,559 2,047,206 1,248,641 150,689 601,125 947,015 817,701 11,949,186 Contractual services 11,089,188 681,984 190,234 673,050 1,007,222 211,070 115,819 387,676 283,368 14,639,611 Commodities 1,200,700 70,600 114,700 391,000 140,750 25,250 79,000 149,900 148,950 2,320,850 Internal services 1,651,224 410,796 43,548 337,068 245,892 39,024 65,160 155,508 133,596 3,081,816 Depreciation 6,307,000 117,000 290,000 904,000 665,000 514,000 6,000 145,000 37,000 8,985,000 Interest 482,749 - 4,775 179,617 58,436 - - - - 725,577 Transfers and contributions 460,850 1,000,000 - - - - - - - 1,460,850 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT 24,305,411 15,741,071 1,228,066 4,722,941 3,476,941 940,033 867,604 1,863,099 1,432,615 54,577,781 CHANGE IN NET POSITION 5,176,213$ (51,082)$ (102,996)$ (97,841)$ (439,202) (368,033)$ (65,121)$ (451,195)$ (170,615)$ 3,430,128$ 2023 ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS 9/17/2021 CITY OF EDINA Proposed Internal Service Fund Budgets Risk Equipment Information Facilities Management Operations Technology Management Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN Operating revenues 1,101,912$ 2,005,452$ 2,394,384$ 1,383,480$ 6,885,228$ TOTAL REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN 1,101,912 2,005,452 2,394,384 1,383,480 6,885,228 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY DEPARTMENT Information technology - - 2,347,413 - 2,347,413 Human resources 1,101,903 - - - 1,101,903 Public works - 1,966,101 - - 1,966,101 Engineering - - - 1,356,361 1,356,361 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT 1,101,903 1,966,101 2,347,413 1,356,361 6,771,778 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY TYPE Personal services 157,103 768,681 1,307,453 551,641 2,784,878 Contractual services 944,800 197,020 869,960 607,220 2,619,000 Commodities - 1,000,400 25,000 197,500 1,222,900 Capital Outlay - - 145,000 - 145,000 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT 1,101,903 1,966,101 2,347,413 1,356,361 6,771,778 CHANGE IN NET POSITION 9$ 39,351$ 46,971$ 27,119$ 113,450$ 2022 INTERNAL SERVICE FUND BUDGETS 9/17/2021 CITY OF EDINA Proposed Internal Service Fund Budgets Risk Equipment Information Facilities Management Operations Technology Management Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN Operating revenues 1,107,240$ 2,055,684$ 2,480,184$ 1,407,108$ 7,050,216$ TOTAL REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN 1,107,240 2,055,684 2,480,184 1,407,108 7,050,216 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY DEPARTMENT Information technology - - 2,431,535 - 2,431,535 Human resources 1,107,234 - - - 1,107,234 Public works - 2,015,368 - - 2,015,368 Engineering - - - 1,379,522 1,379,522 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT 1,107,234 2,015,368 2,431,535 1,379,522 6,933,659 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY TYPE Personal services 162,434 797,148 1,387,675 573,802 2,921,059 Contractual services 944,800 205,120 868,860 608,220 2,627,000 Commodities - 1,013,100 25,000 197,500 1,235,600 Capital Outlay - - 150,000 - 150,000 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT 1,107,234 2,015,368 2,431,535 1,379,522 6,933,659 CHANGE IN NET POSITION 6$ 40,316$ 48,649$ 27,586$ 116,557$ 2023 INTERNAL SERVICE FUND BUDGETS 9/17/2021 V3.0 Draft 3.0 Aug 13, 2021 Page 1 of 8 2022-2023 DRAFT Budget Work Plan Pillar 1: Resilient City infrastructure, facilities, technology, & equipment meets community needs now and in the future. STRONG FOUNDATION OBJECTIVES: • Incorporate financial, societal and environmental costs into decision-making processes. • Incorporate lifecycle and maintenance costs and climate adaptation design practices to allow more informed decision making. • Maintain and replace City facilities, assets and equipment in a manner that avoids deferred maintenance, prevents emergency repair and replaces assets at the most cost-effective time. • Manage the City’s facilities, operations, equipment and capital investments in a manner that increases energy efficiency, reduces the City’s carbon footprint and GHG emissions and meets sustainability goals. Performance indicators and targets for success Measures The specifics strategies will will utilize or projects we will complete this budget-cyle. 2022-2023 Actions How we make decisions and define success for each Pillar. Pillar Objectives The broad outcomes that we need to acheive for a successful budget. Budget Pillars V3.0 Draft 3.0 Aug 13, 2021 Page 2 of 8 2022-2023 DRAFT Budget Work Plan • Design and build resilient infrastructure that reduces flooded structures, improves water quality (drinking and surface) and increases filtered drinking water production. 2022-2023 Actions Department Lead INFRASTRUCTURE (Streets, water, storm, sanitary sewer,) 1 As debt levies expire, increase the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Levy by equivalent amount to establish reliable funding for ongoing building maintenance, replacement, and capital improvements. Finance 2 Capture the Southdale TIF tax capacity for funding street reconstruction Finance 3 Implement decision regarding street assessment financing and transition for years 2022 - 2023 Engineering 4 Host local option sales tax referendum in 2022 general election. If approved, implement the results. Finance/Parks & Rec/City Clerk 5 Approve a clean water strategy for surface waters. (Q32022) Engineering 6 Develop funding strategy to implement a street lighting system and maintenance plan that balances sustainability, public safety, and quality of life goals, including increasing energy efficiency, ensuring safely lit community, and minimizing light pollution. (Q4 2022) Engineering 7 Implement Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project (Q4 2023) Engineering 8 Implement Recommendations from 2020-2021 Utility Rate Study Finance 9 Design and construct Replacement Lift Station #6 Engineering 10 Implement Grandview District Transportation and Utility Improvements Engineering 11 Develop funding plan and implement iron and manganese removal improvements to Water Treatment Plant 6. PW BUILDINGS & FACILITIES 12 Consider recommendations from Parks & Recreation Commission for using alternative funding methods for park improvements and determine next steps. Finance 13 Reassess City Hall Space needs for post-pandemic service delivery. Facilities 14 Implement Green Building Policy into evaluation, design and construction of City capital projects. Engineering 15 Develop roof replacement and rehabilitation plan for City facilities (Q4 2022) Parking ramp, lots, shared maintenance – maintenance agreements ADA Develop funding plan for maintenance of buildings (enterprise & general fund) Engineering 16 Acquire Station 2 construction site. Determine finance method/plans. Select a project architect. Approve construction plans to ensure the building satisfies the needs of City staff to provide 24 hour fire and EMS operations. Include office space for Community Health division within the Station 2 site. Fire/Facilities V3.0 Draft 3.0 Aug 13, 2021 Page 3 of 8 2022-2023 DRAFT Budget Work Plan 17 Determine finance method and plan for Fire Station 3 in the Northeast Quadrant of the City. Propose and acquire site after Station 2 site is determined, utilizing response models to provide efficient emergency response to all residents. Fire TECHNOLOGY & EQUIPMENT 18 Complete SCADA upgrade that monitors and ensures delivery of safe potable water and improve our ability to have a reliable storm and sanitary sewer system. (Currently under contract will be complete in Q2 2022) Public Works 19 Continue Implementation of City’s Green Fleet Policy. Engineering 20 Expand the City’s fiber optic network for faster and more secure connections IT 21 Expand use of GIS – Integrate additional City systems when appropriate. IT 22 Replace Public Safety Computer-aided Dispatch (CAD) and Record Management System (RMS) Go live Q1 2023. Police STRONG FOUNDATION MEASURES 22-23 Targets: • Reduce the City’s building energy GHG emissions by 5 percent annually through implementation of energy management plans, City Sustainability Buildings Policy, ongoing facility maintenance, capital improvements and operational behavior change. • Implement Green Fleet Policy to increase fuel efficiency of City vehicle and equipment fleet 30 percent year-over-year. Pillar 2: City services are delivered effectively and efficiently and best balance community needs. The City delivers a variety of services, including police and fire response, water and sewer, snow plowing and building inspections, that are essential for the safety and wellbeing of those who live, work or visit Edina. In addition, amenities and services including recreation facilities, parks and programs contribute to the overall quality of life within the community. To deliver reliable service, the City needs to recruit and retain a strong workforce that has the resources and technology needed to effectively and efficiently perform their work. RELIABLE SERVICE OBJECTIVES V3.0 Draft 3.0 Aug 13, 2021 Page 4 of 8 2022-2023 DRAFT Budget Work Plan • Provide high-quality services in an efficient manner that demonstrates respect for the public ensures appropriate response times. • Provide a safe and secure working environment for employees. • Promote an engaging and respectful work culture that values employee quality of life, physical and mental-wellbeing and work/life balance. • Provide competitive employee compensation and benefits to attract and retain a skilled and high- performing workforce. • Provide staffing, tools, equipment, resources, and training to meet expectations for service delivery • Utilize effective technology to easily maintain and locate data for the public, reduce risk and provide better data for informed decision-making by elected officials and staff. • Ensure that limited resources (money, equipment and time) are deployed in an equitable and sustainable manner. 2022-2023 Strategy/Action: Department Lead 1 Complete Implementation of ERP inluding,Utility Billing and additional Human Resource modules Finance 2 Determine long-term plan for future of Art Center Building & delivery of Art programs. Parks & Recreation 3 Determine election process for Local Option Sales Tax (LOST ) implementation. Parks & Recreation/ Administration 4 Expand GIS applications and continue to increase integration of disparate City data systems, (e.g., Financial, Human Resources and Geographic Information Systems) for better decision-making and easier access. Information Technology 5 Evaluate remote work and services delivery – long-term impact post-COVID ensure: • resources for employee mental health and work/life balance • Part-time / seasonal staffing model and compensation Human Resources 6 Increase resources for Mental Health calls for service – resources, training, coordination Human Resources/Police 7 Develop and implement plan to respond to challenges and public safety recruitment Fire, Police & Administration 8 Continue to increase diversity of workforce. All Departments 9 Implement new agreement with Edina Public Schools regarding election administration. Administration V3.0 Draft 3.0 Aug 13, 2021 Page 5 of 8 2022-2023 DRAFT Budget Work Plan RELIABLE SERVICEDS MEASURES 22-23 Targets: PILLAR 3: Plan for Connected & Sustainable Development Redevelopment and renewal of commercial and residential real estate is essential to the vibrancy of the community. Redevelopment will play an integral part of providing an inclusive, high quality of life that the Edina community expects. It is important to ensure plans and policies are relevant today and flexible for tomorrow. Incorporating sustainability principles and standards during redevelopment with the goal of reducing the community’s carbon footprint will be critical to human health and safety. Creating sustainable redevelopment requires forward thinking and preparing for the future. ONGOING OBJECTIVES • Determine, track and meet sustainability goals for metrics such as energy, transportation, water and waste. • Connect neighborhoods, businesses and open spaces. • Support the continued high quality of life offered to residents and those who work in Edina. • Promote affordable lifecycle housing. • Demonstrate resiliency to changing climate and future community needs. • Continue installation of sidewalks and shared-use paths (e.g., Twin Loops implementation). 2020-2021 Strategy/Action: Department Lead 1 Continue implementing strategies to create affordable housing units using the affordable housing trust fund and other applicable sources; explore acquiring another parcel for a multi-housing development; continue developing single family and multi-family preservation strategies; Community Development 2 Implement green building policy to incent sustainable building and operational practices for new development and redevelopment. (Connected with 1-2) Engineering V3.0 Draft 3.0 Aug 13, 2021 Page 6 of 8 2022-2023 DRAFT Budget Work Plan 3 Execute and implement redevelopment agreements for 5146 Eden Ave. Comm Dev 4 Implement Climate Action Plan and develop measures /outcomes for success Engineering 5 Explore a strategy to create district parking in the 44th and France Area per the 44th and France Small Area Plan, including parameters that balance current transportation needs and sustainability goals. (Q4 2021) Study will be done – if possible, implement. ??? Keep a place holder. Community Development/ Finance 6 Prepare a District Plan for the Cahill Industrial Park Community Development 7 Implement recommendations of the Housing Strategy Task Force final report Community Development 9 Determine spending plan for available TIF funds by 2022 Community Development/ Finance 10 Explore ways City had incent expansion of fiber optic to public. Community Development 11 Expand the HRA levy to generate funds that can be leveraged for land acquisition, bridge loans and renovations. Community Development/ Finance PILLAR 4: Foster Inclusive and Engaged Community It is important that the City helps to foster a community that is welcoming and inclusive to all who live, work and spend time in Edina. The City wants to ensure that it works for all of the community. Efforts to engage the community will utilize multiple platforms, be informative, transparent, responsive and involve volunteers and City Commissions. BETTER TOGETHER OBJECTIVES • Ensure City policies and practices do not have disparate impacts based on race, color, national origin, creed, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender expression, familial status or disability. • Conduct clear and meaningful community engagement where: o The decision to be made and decision-making process is clearly defined. o Individuals understand how and when they can participate. o The City communicates what feedback is used and why. V3.0 Draft 3.0 Aug 13, 2021 Page 7 of 8 2022-2023 DRAFT Budget Work Plan o Inclusive engagement methods provide a variety of ways for the public to participate in the decision-making process and ensure all voices are heard. o Residents are satisfied with the process, even if they disagree with the outcome. NEW 2020-2021 Strategy/Action: Department Lead 1 Continue implementation of the Racial Equity Implementation Plan and incorporate new goals/work plans into ongoing dept work plans. Administration 2 Create strategy, tools, and templates for better alignment and measurement of Council Values (Community Engagement, Sustainability, Community Health, and Race & Equity) into City decision-making and purchasing. • Finalize strategy, tools and templates (Q4 2022) • Implement strategy and train on tools and templates (Q3 2023) Administration 3 Strengthen leadership and support for City-wide racial equity work, including providing additional training, tools and resources to embed an equity framework to City processes, services and decisions. This strategy will build upon all employee and leadership training conducted in 2018- 2019. 2022- Focus on strengthen City Council race and equity development through quarterly resources and activities 2022 Implement race and equity training for part-time and seasonal staff that is embedded in on-boarding training. Administration 4 Post-pandemic community engagement evaluation • Public meetings • Virtual or remote participation • Online engagement Administration 5 Implement Board and Commission diversity strategy. (2022-2024) • Create a recruitment / outreach plan that is inclusive and inviting • Establish intentional interview & appointment process • Training & Retention Administration 6 Administer 2023 Quality of Live Survey Communications 7 Strengthen relationships and build ones with residents and underrepresented groups. • Establish inventory of current relationships between the City, residents, groups (2022) • Create plan to make relationships foundational and establish trust between the City and the community (2023) Administration 8 Overall performance dashboards/how to communicate data and results (eg QLS survey). Information Technology/ Administration V3.0 Draft 3.0 Aug 13, 2021 Page 8 of 8 2022-2023 DRAFT Budget Work Plan 9 Complaint process & bias (RE Work Plan) • Develop tracking process and policy (Q2 2022) • Training (Q4 2022) • Implementation and tracking (Q1 2023) Administration 10 Improve Public Safety (Police & Fire, Community Engagement & Demographics) (RE workplan) • Evaluate current community outreach programs in public safety departments. • Create new opportunities for community engagement through communication strategies and promotions. • Create assessment for community engagement opportunities Police, Fire & Administration 11 Ensure successful implementation of ARPA Funding Administration The CITYofEDINA2022-23 Budget and Preliminary LevySeptember 21, 2021 The CITYofEDINAAgenda•Budget•Process and Timeline•2022-2023 Preliminary Budget and Levies•Tax Comparisons•Discussionwww.EdinaMN.gov2 The CITYofEDINAwww.EdinaMN.gov3Edina Consolidated Budget $132MGovernmental Funds $75MGeneral Fund $48MDebt Service Fund $7MConstruction Fund $11MSpecial Revenue Funds, including HRA $9MEnterprise Funds $50MUtility Fund $22MLiquor Fund $15MPark Enterprises $13MInternal Service Funds $7MRisk Management $1MEquip. Operations $2MIT $2MFacilities $2M The CITYofEDINAEstimated Market Value (B)9.18.99.09.810.410.911.612.412.913.313.82012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022www.EdinaMN.gov4 The CITYofEDINABudget Timelinewww.EdinaMN.gov5Date TopicPresenter(s)March City Council Retreat StaffJune 1 Department Heads submit Budget RequestsJuly 7 ELT Reviews 2022-2023 Budget Draft ELT DiscussionJuly 212022-2023 Draft Budget Work Plan & ScenariosCC Work SessionAug. 172022-2023 City Manager proposed budgetCC Work SessionSept. 9 CC consent to two-year HRA levy CC MeetingSept. 10 Preliminary HRA Levy Adoption HRA MeetingSept. 21Preliminary CC Levy AdoptionCC MeetingOct. 19 2022-2023 Budget Discussion/Update CC Work SessionNov. 16 Open (Another 30 mins with CC?) CC Work SessionDec. 7 TNT Budget Presentation CC Work SessionDec. 7 TNT Budget Hearing (CC and HRA) CC/HRA MeetingDec. 21 Last Day to Adopt Budget CC/HRA Meeting The CITYofEDINABiennial Budget Process2021 (Odd Year)Second year of 2020-2021 BudgetApprove 2022-2023 budget, including CIP levy2020 (Even Year)First year of 2020-2021 Budget Review/approve of 2021-2026 CIPwww.EdinaMN.gov6 Vision Edina(Twenty-year)Budget Work Plan Operating Budget(Two-year)Department Work Plans (Annual)Employee Work Plans (Annual)Commission Work Plans (Annual)Comprehensive Plan (Ten-year)Capital Improvement Plan (Five-year)Strategic PolicyImplementation LevelWork PlanBudget Two-Year Budget Work PlanCity-Wide Performance MeasuresApproval: City CouncilAccountable: City ManagerAnnual Department Work PlansCity-Wide Performance Measures Approval: City ManagerAccountable: Department DirectorIndividual Work PlansAnnual Performance ReviewsApproval: ManagerAccountable: EmployeeAnnual Commission Work Plans Approval: City CouncilAccountable: CommissionBudget Work PlanOther Work Plans 2022-2023 Budget & Work PlanGOALSGOALSGOALSGOALSOBJECTIVESOBJECTIVESOBJECTIVESOBJECTIVESSTRATEGIESSTRATEGIESSTRATEGIESSTRATEGIESBroad Outcomes(Evergreen)Measurable Results(This Budget)Specific Actions(This Budget)Goals (Pillars) •Fire Stations 2 and 3•Begin implementation of Street Financing•Implement Morningside flood infrastructure•Design & construct Lift Station #6•Roof replacement plan for City facilities. •Expand GIS capabilities•Technology Security2022-2023 Budget Work Planwww.EdinaMN.gov10 •Evaluate post-pandemic remote work and service delivery. •Re-assess City Hall Space Needs Study for post-pandemic service delivery.•Increase resources for mental health calls for service.•Art Center – long-term plan for building & programs•Implement new elections agreement with EPS2022-2023 Budget Work Planwww.EdinaMN.gov11 •Implement Green Building Policy•Implement Climate Action Plan•Affordable Housing•Blake Road Construction•Consider PARC recommendation for alternate funding•Explore ways City can incent expansion of fiber optic to public2022-2023 Budget Work Planwww.EdinaMN.gov12 •Continue Racial Equity Implementation Plan •Assess post-pandemic community engagement strategies (evaluate what to keep, stop, expand)•Implement Board & Commission diversity strategy•Administer 2023 Quality of Life Survey•Ensure successful implementation of ARPA funding2022-2023 Budget Work Planwww.EdinaMN.gov13 The CITYofEDINAProposed 2022-23 Budgetexcluding Special Street Levy www.EdinaMN.gov14Proposed Proposed2021 2022 2023General Fund $ 33,986,471 $ 36,708,036 $ 38,947,298 6.14% 8.01% 6.10%Arts/Culture $ 20,000 $ -$ -0% -100% N/ADebt Service $ 3,651,400 $ 3,657,000 $ 3,653,000 -20.56% 0.15% -0.11%Construction $ 4,130,000 $ 4,240,000 $ 4,350,000 45.94% 2.66% 2.59%HRA $ 230,400 $ 237,300 $ 244,400 20.00% 2.99% 2.99%Total Tax Levy $ 42,018,271 $ 44,842,336 $ 47,194,698 % Increase 5.95% 6.72% 5.25%AM1A1 Slide 14AM1 Needs to be updatedAlisha McAndrews, 9/15/2021A1 DoneAdministrator, 9/16/2021 The CITYofEDINAProposed 2022-23 Budget www.EdinaMN.gov15*Special street levy is 2.26% of the increaseAugust 17th Proposed August 17th Proposed2021 2022 2022 2023 2023General Fund $ 33,986,471 $ 36,258,036 $ 36,708,036 $ 38,497,298 $ 38,947,298 6.14% 6.68% 8.01% 6.18% 6.10%Arts/Culture $ 20,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -0% -100% -100% N/A N/ADebt Service $ 3,651,400 $ 3,657,000 $ 3,657,000 $ 3,653,000 $ 3,653,000 -20.56% 0.15% 0.15% -0.11% -0.11%Construction $ 4,130,000 $ 4,240,000 $ 4,240,000 $ 4,350,000 $ 4,350,000 45.94% 2.66% 2.66% 2.59% 2.59%Special Street $ - $ 950,000 $ 950,000 $ 1,210,400 $ 1,210,400 0% N/A N/A 27.41% 27.41%HRA $ 230,400 $ 237,300 $ 237,300 $ 244,400 $ 244,400 20.00% 2.99% 2.99% 2.99% 2.99%Total Tax Levy $ 42,018,271 $ 45,342,336 $ 45,792,336 $ 47,955,098 $ 48,405,098 % Increase 5.95% 7.91% 8.98%* 5.76% 5.71%AM2A2 Slide 15AM2 Needs to be updatedAlisha McAndrews, 9/15/2021A2 Done, updated previous numbers to August work session figuresAdministrator, 9/16/2021 The CITYofEDINABudget AlignmentStill unknown impact to staffing to support increasing demands for services and priorities in the 22-23 Budget Work Planwww.EdinaMN.gov16AM3A3 Slide 16AM3 updateAlisha McAndrews, 9/15/2021A3 Did not update, not sure how you want to discuss/present the added $450kAdministrator, 9/16/2021 The CITYofEDINAPreliminary Tax Levy for 2022www.EdinaMN.gov17Change Reason2.75% Wage increases0.66% Benefit increases3.03% Service level changes, internal service fund charges, and all other changes0.26% Equipment levy ($100,000)0.02%HRA levy ($6,900)6.72%Total 2022 levy without Special Street levy2.26%Special Street levy ($950,000)8.98%Total 2022 City + HRA levy increaseAM4A4 Slide 17AM4 UpdateAlisha McAndrews, 9/15/2021A4 Done, increased service level changes percentAdministrator, 9/16/2021 The CITYofEDINAIncreased Capital Fundingwww.EdinaMN.gov18•Planned increase to Capital Improvement Plan Levy•5% annual increase to Equipment Levy20192020202120222023Construction Fund LeviesCapital Improvement Plan Levy 300,000 800,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Equipment Levy 1,930,000 2,030,000 2,130,000 2,240,000 2,350,000 The CITYofEDINA2022 Estimated Levy Impacts•In 2021 the median home pays about $135 per month in property taxes to fund all City provided services.•Total EMV is increasing by about 3.7% for taxes payable in 2022. The median value single family home is now $571,800.•With an 8.98% property tax levy increase, the effect on the 2022 median valued home would be about a:•- 5.98% increase in City property taxes.•- $97 increase per year, or $8.08 per month.•- $143 payment per month in 2022 City property taxes.www.EdinaMN.gov19AM5A5 Slide 19AM5 updateAlisha McAndrews, 9/15/2021A5 DoneAdministrator, 9/16/2021 The CITYofEDINA•$6.8 million added back to tax base•Tax impact (incl SD II TIF) - $97•Tax impact (w/o SD II TIF) – $179www.EdinaMN.gov20Southdale 2 Tax ImpactAM6A6 Slide 20AM6 Update? Do we still need this slide?Alisha McAndrews, 9/15/2021A6 UpdatedAdministrator, 9/16/2021 The CITYofEDINA2022 HRA Levy •State law allows an HRA to levy up to 0.0185% the previous year’s taxable market value of all property in the City. This limit would produce tax revenue of about $2.5M in Edina.•An HRA raises its own levy separate from the City. •HRA levies must be used only for purposes listed in the HRA Act.•A $237,300 HRA levy in Edina would be $9.00/year for a median single-family home ($571,800)•Consent provided at Sept. 9 HRA meetingwww.EdinaMN.gov21 The CITYofEDINAProperty Tax Historywww.EdinaMN.gov222012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022City tax$1,082 $1,102 $1,140 $1,195 $1,266 $1,319 $1,393 $1,474 $1,566 $1,623 $1,720Total tax$5,410 $5,449 $5,606 $5,835 $6,276 $6,367 $6,715 $6,982 $7,251 $7,247Median Value$403,10 $396,30 $399,70 $438,80 $457,30 $466,50 $501,00 $530,65 $548,50 $551,30 $571,80$1,082 $1,720 $5,410 $7,247 $- $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000"Median" Value Home The CITYofEDINANext Steps •Certify preliminary tax levy on Sept. 21•Based on Council input, continue to refine 2022-2023 budget•Budget discussion/update to Council at work session on Oct. 19 •Public hearing on Dec. 7•Final date to take action is hearing on Dec. 21www.EdinaMN.gov23 The CITYofEDINAQuestions/Discussion www.EdinaMN.gov24 Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Scott Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Appoint Acting Mayor Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion appointing Councilmember Anderson as Acting Mayor for the time period when Mayor Hovland and Acting Mayor Staunton are out of the country. INTRODUCTION: Mayor Hovland and Acting Mayor Staunton will be out of the country late September. It is customary to appoint the senior Councilmember as Acting Mayor. Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: X.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Susan M Tarnowski, General Manager-Edina Arts Center Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Arts & Culture Commission July 22, 2021 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None; information only. INTRODUCTION: Receive the minutes of the Arts & Culture Commission Meeting for July 22, 2021. ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: Arts & Culture Commission July, 22, 2021 Draft Minutes ☐ Approved Minutes ☒ Approved Date: 8/26/2021 Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Edina Arts & Culture Commission HYBRID MEETING July 22, 2021 4:30 p.m. I. Call to Order Vice-Chair Rubin called the meeting to order at 4:32 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Commissioners Amlaw, Fram, Johnson, Rubin, Stemmler, Suckow, Westlund Absent were Commissioner Chandler and Student Commissioner Shen Commissioner Sorenson joined the meeting Staff present: Parks and Recreation Director Perry Vetter, Assistant Recreation and Facilities Director Tracy Petersen, Art Center General Manager, Susan Tarnowski III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Motion made by Suckow to approve the meeting agenda. Motion seconded by Fram. Roll call vote. Motion carried. IV. Approval of Meeting Minutes Motion made by Westlund to approve the June 24, 2021minutes. Motion seconded by Suckow. Roll call vote. Motion carried. V. Special recognitions and Presentations Commissioner Kathy Amlaw was welcomed to the Arts & Culture Commission VI. Community Comment There were no community comments VII. Reports/Recommendations A. 2021 Work Plan Updates Initiative #1 – Commissioners Fram and Stemmler reported Working with city staff on the promotion of the virtual gallery to increase submissions Considering a slide show of the gallery contents and Edina TV Seeing some submission increase in response to marketing efforts, social media Considering flyers, posters, or signs with QR codes; MPR, publications Nolan Mains continues to feature virtual gallery artists weekly during the summer Comment: need for a Mosaic student to serve as liaison with the Commission Draft Minutes ☐ Approved Minutes ☒ Approved Date: 8/26/2021 Initiative #2 - Commissioners Fram and Stemmler reported Evaluation: Commissioners are working with staff to review analytics for site Currently no way for the public to engage with the art/artists with comments or a “like” function Initiative #3 - Commissioner Rubin Reported Did a deeper dive by talking to staff in Edina and other cities, and consultants Developed a list of best practices, not yet in the form of recommendations; for example, the city of St. Louis Park has a separate 501(c)(3) Highlighted Arts & Culture chapter in the Comprehensive Plan: big, bold ideas Continuing public sculpture on public land, need for maintenance and repair Incorporation of art proposals in public or private development planning Arts & Culture Commission would serve in an advisory capacity Next meeting – a more complete report; will need ACC vote and a Staff Report as the next steps towards submitting the report to Council Initiative #4 – Director Vetter and commissioner Suckow reported Consultant developing a plan to move forward with physical space for a 3D space Current: data requests, evaluate other centers, program plan, marketing plan Determine need for instructions, gallery, consignment gift shop Compare facility/program needs to available space Commissioner Amlaw is interested in working on this initiative B. 2021-2022 Work Plan Development August 2021 meeting will be used to finalize recommendations Continue Initiative #1 - Public Art Plan initiative for Year 2 o Community-wide program o Bring the virtual gallery to in-person events o Collaboration with Parks and Recreation on public art for Yancey Park; celebrate removal of racial covenants o Collaboration with Energy & Environment Commission on climate change and sustainability o Explore a sister-city (if applicable) project o Review ideas from St. Louis Park Continue current Initiative #2 on evaluation of public art activities Continue current Initiative #3 on a process that includes consideration of art in public and private developments Continue current Initiative #4 on new art center space All ideas should be submitted to the Commission Chair by August 19, 2021 for inclusion in the meeting packet. Draft Minutes ☐ Approved Minutes ☒ Approved Date: 8/26/2021 VII. Chair and Member Comments Edina Creative Writing Contest – August 16, 2021 Shared Commission booth at the Edina Fall Into the Arts Festival 2021 o Identified Initiative #1 Commissions to work on ideas, banners, booth staffing VIII. Staff Comments General Manager Tarnowski commented: Update Edina Fall Into the Arts Festival (September 11 & 12) Artist applications closed, jury process completed, vendor contracts confirmed, sponsors are still being accepted Speaking of Authors … taping of an interview with author Joan Treppa that will be available on YouTube and on Edina TV VIII. Adjournment Motion made by Suckow to adjourn the July 22, 2021 meeting of the Arts & Culture Council at 6:13. Motion seconded by Amlaw. Roll call vote. Motion carried. Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: X.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Grace Hancock, Sustainability Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Energy & Environment Commission August 12, 2021 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Information only. INTRODUCTION: Receive the attached minutes of the Energy and Environment Commission for August 12, 2021. ATTACHMENTS: Description 2021-08-12 EEC Minutes Agenda Energy and Environment Commission City Of Edina, Minnesota City Hall - Community Room This meeting will be held in person and electronically using Webex software. The meeting will be streamed live on the City's YouTube channel, YouTube.com/EdinaTV or you can listen to the meeting via telephone by calling 1-415-655-0001 access code 177 278 7562. Thursday, August 12, 2021 7:00 PM I.Call To Order Chair Martinez called the meeting to order at 7:02 PM II.Roll Call Answering roll call were Chair Martinez, Commissioners Horan, Hovanec, Haugen, Lanzas, Lukens, Tessman, Student Commissioners Ana Martinez and Mans. Absent: Commissioners Dakane and Ratan. III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda Meeting Agenda was approved Motion by Michelle Horan to Approve Meeting Agenda. Seconded by Tom Tessman. Motion Carried. IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion by Bayardo Lanzas to Approve Meeting Minutes. Seconded by Michelle Horan. Motion Carried. A.Minutes: Energy and Environment Commission July 22, 2021 V.Special Recognitions And Presentations A.Water Resources Update: Jessica Wilson Jessica Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator, and Tessa Rugg, Water Intern, presented updates on water resources management in Edina and answered questions from the commissioners. Intern Rugg also presented the Natural Areas storymap on Edinamn.gov. VI.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VII.Reports/Recommendations A.2021 WP Initiative #1: Climate Action Plan Chair Martinez provided an update on the Climate Action Plan B.2021 WP Initiative #2: To-Go Packaging Commissioner Horan provided an update on the to-go packaging ordinance and proposed that EEC approve the draft ordinance to advance to City Council. Comments from Commissioners: Interviewed 10 cities to complete ordinance, share previously with City Council at June EEC work session Motion by Bayardo Lanzas to Motion to approve ordinance and advance to City Council. Seconded by Hilda Martinez Salgado. Motion Carried. C.2021 WP Initiative #3: EEC Event Tabling Commissioner Lanzas provided an update on the Event Tabling. Volunteers are welcome to help with Farmer's Market events. Staff Liaison Hancock invited Commissioners to volunteer for the Fall into the Arts Festival in September for their moving to zero waste effort. D.Staff Report: Edina Forest Practices EEC received written report from City Forester Luther Overholt to inform 2022 Workplan development. E.2022 Workplan Development Discussion Commission members discussed the 2022 Work Plan ideas. VIII.Chair And Member Comments Chair Martinez thanked student commissioners Ana Martinez and Peter Mans for their service. IX.Staff Comments Staff informed EEC of new student commissioners beginning September, 2021. Staff informed Commissioners about meeting changes beginning in September. X.Adjournment Motion by Hilda Martinez Salgado to Adjourn the Meeting at 9:21pm.. Seconded by Cory Lukens. Motion Carried. T he City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: X.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Risi Karim, City Management Fellow Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Human Rights & Relations Commission July 27, 2020 CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None; information only. INTRODUCTION: Receive the minutes from the July 27, 2021 Human Rights & Relations Commission. ATTACHMENTS: Description 7.27.21 HRRC Minutes Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 8/24/2021 Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Human Rights & Relations Commission Virtual Meeting, WebEx, July 27, 2021, 7 p.m. I. Call To Order Chair Epstein shared information for virtual meeting guidelines for Commissioners and those watching or listening in to the meeting. Chair Epstein called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering Roll Call In-Person: Chair Epstein and Commissioner Bennett; Student Commissioner Lichtenberger and Mirza Answering Roll Call via WebEx: Commissioners Edwards, Felton, Ismail, Stringer Moore, Segall, and Guadarrama Staff Present: Heidi Lee, Race & Equity Coordinator and Risi Karim, City Management Fellow Absent: Commissioner Ross and Student Commissioner Borene III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Motion by Commissioner Bennett to approve the July 27, 2021 meeting agenda, seconded by Commissioner Stringer Moore. Roll call vote. Motion carried. IV. Approval of Meeting Minutes Commissioners indicated the following changes to the draft minutes: • Under Section V. Initiative #4 line 2, change “assisted” to “assist” • Change last bulletin of 2022 Work Plan Development section from “2021” work plan development to “2022” Work Plan • Under Chair and Community comment: o Line one, add an “s” to activist and change “that” to “who." o Line two, change “voter rights” to “voting rights.” o Line three, change “voter rights” to “voting rights.” Motion by Commissioner Bennett to approve the June 22, 2021 meeting minutes, seconded by Commissioner Segall. Roll call vote. Motion carried. Community Comment V. Reports/Recommendations Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 8/24/2021 A. Human Rights & Relations Commission 2021 Work Plan • The Commission discussed the Work Plan with the following updates: o Initiative #1 – Days of Remembrance Commissioner Stringer Moore shared the following updates with the Commission: - Days of Remembrance will be held on July 29th at 7pm in Edina City Hall - Commissioners are asked to attend the event in person if available, but the event can also be viewed virtually on multiple platforms. - Student Commissioners will serve as the MCs of the event. - Mayor Hovland has been confirmed to attend the event and will give opening remarks. - If Commissioners are available the subcommittee would appreciate assistance with set up beginning at 5:30pm. o Initiative #2 – Tom Oye Award No update o Initiative #3 – Sharing Values Sharing Community Event Commissioner Felton shared the following updates with the Commission: - Commissioner Stringer Moore will serve as the MC of the event - The subcommittee has begun the process of recruiting and confirming speakers for the event - Staff will look into hybrid options for speakers to be able to present from home - Commissioners Segall and Bennett will be in charge of solidifying the line up of presenters - Student Commissioner Mirza will be in charge of organizing the open mic section of the event Staff Liaison Lee confirms that staff will be able to share marketing materials to media outlets such as the Sun Current. o Initiative #4 – Race, Justice, and Policing Community Awareness Plan & Implementation Commissioner Felton shared the following updates with the Commission: - The Community Conversations: Race, Justice and Policing event will be held Sunday, October 17,2021, from 3:00pm-5:00pm in the City Council Chambers at City Hall. Staff Liaison Lee shares that Sergeant Nate Mendel of the Edina Police Department will be available to assist the subcommittee with the planning of the event. o Initiative #5 – Bias Offense Review No update o Initiative #6 – Review and comment on a plan developed by P&R and R&E staff - Staff Liaison Lee shares the tentative timeline to have material available to the Commission for review & comment by the end of quarter 4. B. 2022 Work Plan Development • The Commission discussed the 2022 Work Plan and what would be completed, continued, or added from this year’s Work Plan. - Commissioner Segall expresses her preference for initiatives the Commission moves forward with, which includes the growing concern over Ageism in Edina. - Student Commissioner Mirza expresses his preference for initiatives the Commission moves forward with, which includes recognizing Native American Heritage - Student Commissioner Lichtenberger shares her support for engaging in an initiative that encompasses training to educate the community about felon rights. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 8/24/2021 - Commissioner Bennett shares her support for incorporating mental health education and awareness into the Race, Justice, and Policing event. Commissioner Bennett also poses a question to the Commission about how tackling the topic of felon voting right looks on a local scale. - Commissioner Guadarrama ask the Commission if there is data to support the impact prior initiatives have had on the community to gauge which initiatives have had the biggest impact and should stay, opposed to other initiatives that have not made as big of an impact. - Staff Liaison Lee shares the 2022 Work Plan timeline with the Commission, she also request Commissioners send her their preferences of initiatives via email. VI. Chair and Member Comments Received VII. Staff Comments Received VIII. Adjournment Motion by Commissioner Segall to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Commissioner Guadarrama . Roll call vote. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:25 p.m. Date: September 21, 2021 Agenda Item #: XIV. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Calendar of City Council Meetings and Events Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None; information only. INTRODUCTION: Date Time Meeting/Event Location Tues, Sept 21 5:30 p.m.Work Session - CANCELLED Community Room 7:00 p.m.City Council Regular Meeting Council Chambers Thurs, Sept 23 7:30 a.m.Housing and Redevelopment Authority - CANCELLED Council Chambers Mon, Sept 27 5:00 p.m.Infrastructure Tour Tues, Sept 28 7:00 p.m.“Neighborhood First” Transportation P lanning Virtual Tues, Oct 5 5:30 p.m.Boards & Commission Annual Work Plan Community Room 7:00 p.m.City Council Regular Meeting Council Chambers Thurs, Oct 14 7:30 a.m.Housing and Redevelopment Authority Council Chambers Tues, Oct 19 5:30 p.m.2022-2023 Budget / Sustainable Building Policy Community Room 7:00 p.m.City Council Regular Meeting Council Chambers Thurs, Oct 28 7:30 a.m.Housing and Redevelopment Authority Council Chambers