Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2021-10-19 City Council Meeting Packet
Agenda City Council Meeting City of Edina, Minnesota Edina City Hall Council Chambers Tuesday, October 19, 2021 7:00 PM Watch the meeting on cable TV or at EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeetings or Facebook.com/EdinaMN. Participate in Community Comment and Public Hearing in person, or Call 800-374-0221. Enter Conference ID 3297692. Give the operator your name, street address and telephone number. Press *1 on your telephone keypad when you would like to get in the queue to speak. A City sta8 member will introduce you when it is your turn. I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Pledge of Allegiance IV.Approval Of Meeting Agenda V.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Mayor will invite residents to share issues or concerns that are not scheduled for a future public hearing. Items that are on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. The City Manager will respond to questions raised during Community Comments at the next meeting. A.City Manager's Response to Community Comments VI.Adoption Of Consent Agenda All agenda items listed on the Consent Agenda will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless requested to be removed by a Council Member. If removed the item will be considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve, unless otherwise noted in consent item.) A.Approve Minutes: Work Session and Regular, October 5, 2021 B.Approve Payment of Claims C.Approve Pentagon Village LLC Redevelopment Agreement Amendment No. 3 D.Request for Purchase: Two Trackless Snow Machines E.Request for Purchase: Multiquip Generator F.Request for Purchase: 2022 Ford F550 with Service Body and Crane G.Request for Purchase: Edina Liquor Advertising Contract H.Resolution No. 2021-91: Authorizing Flood Hazard Mitigation Grant Assistance Application I.Resolution 2021-92: Setting Public Hearing Date for Municipal Consent of MnDOT I-494 Airport to Highway 169 Project J.Approve Master Agreement for Design Services with HGA K.Request for Purchase: Blake Road Final Design L.Request for Purchase: Change Order No. 1: Watermain Rehabilitation, Contract ENG21-7, Improvement WM-597 M.Request for Purchase: Facility Asset Management Software Tool Renewal N.Resolution No. 2021-94: Providing for the Sale of Refunding Bonds O.Resolution No. 2021-95: Amending the Budget for the Year 2021 P.Ordinance No. 2021-10: Site Improvement Plan Agreement for 4911 77th Street West Q.Resolution No. 2021-96 & Ordinance No. 2021-05: Site Improvement Plan Agreement, and Final Rezoning from PCD-3 to PUD at 4040 70th Street West R.Resolution No. 2021-98: Accepting Donations VII.Special Recognitions And Presentations A.Proclamation: Extra Mile Day 2021 VIII.Public Hearings During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after staG and/or applicants make their presentations. The following guidelines are in place to ensure an eIcient, fair, and respectful hearing; limit your testimony to three minutes and to the matter under consideration; the Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary; avoid repeating remarks or points of view made by previous speakers. The use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution 2021-99 Establishing Eden Willson Tax Increment Financing District IX.Reports/Recommendations: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A.Resolution No. 2021-80: Weed Mowing Special Assessment, Improvement No. WD-21 B.Resolution No. 2021-81: Tree Removal Special Assessment, Improvement No. TR-21 C.Resolution No. 2021-82: Grandview Business District Special Assessment, Improvement G-21 D.Resolution No. 2021-83: Aquatic Vegetation Special Assessment, Improvement No. AQ-21 E.Resolution No. 2021-84: 50th & France Business District Special Assessment, Improvement No. M-21 F.Resolution No. 2021-85: West 58th Street Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Special Assessment, Improvement No. BA-456 G.Resolution No. 2021-86: CertiLcation of Delinquent Utilities No. DU-21 H.Resolution No. 2021-88: Preliminary Rezoning & Preliminary Development Plan with Multiple Variances for City Homes at 4630 France Avenue I.Resolution No. 2021-89: Site Plan Review with Variances at 6500 Barrie Road J.Ordinance No. 2021-11: Amending Chapter 20 Concerning Green To Go Packaging K.Approve Revised 30% Design Layout for Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project X.Commission Correspondence (Minutes and Advisory Communication) A.Minutes: Community Health Commission, August 9, 2021 B.Minutes: Parks & Recreation Commission September 14, 2021 XI.Aviation Noise Update XII.Mayor And Council Comments XIII.Manager's Comments A.Budget Work Plan and Race & Equity Work Plan Updates XIV.Calendar of City Council Meetings and Events XV.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampliLcation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:City Manager's Response to Community Comments Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: City Manager Neal will respond to questions asked at the previous council meeting. Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve Minutes: Work Session and Regular, October 5, 2021 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Minutes as presented. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: Draft Work Session, October 5, 2021 Minutes: Draft Regular Meeting, October 5, 2021 MINUTES OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL TUESDAY, OCTOBER 5, 2021 5:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:32 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, and Mayor Hovland. Staff in attendance: Lisa Schaefer, Assistant City Manager; MJ Lamon, Community Engagement Coordinator; Cary Teague, Community Development Director; Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner; Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner; Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications Director; Perry Vetter, Parks & Recreation Director; Heidi Lee, Race and Equity Coordinator; Stephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager; and Sharon Allison, City Clerk. Commission chairs in attendance: Julia Selleys, Community Health; Annie Schilling, Heritage Preservation; Kate Agnew, Planning; Michael Epstein, Human Rights & Relations; Kirk Johnson, Transportation; Hilda Martinez, Energy & Environment; Rebecca Sorensen, Arts & Culture; and Rick Ites, Parks & Recreation. 2022 COMMISSION PROPOSED WORK PLANS Commission chairs presented their 2022 proposed work plan initiatives. Lamon stated that on Nov. 3, staff would present the final initiatives with Council approval scheduled for Dec. 7. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:52 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ____________________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by the Edina City Council, October 19, 2021. ___________________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 5, 2021 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m., then shared the procedure for public hearing and community comment in the hybrid meeting format. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, and Hovland. Absent: None. III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IV. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED AS PRESENTED Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, to approve the meeting agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, and Hovland Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT Steve Anderson, 4405 Grimes Avenue South, spoke about an open letter published in the Sun Current and impacts to the Morningside flood plan. Carmen Rosland, 6033 St. John’s Avenue, shared frustrations regarding property violations at 4516 and 4518 Valley View Road and the need to enforce. V.A. CITY MANAGER’S RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY COMMENTS Assistant Manager Schaefer responded to Community Comments from the last meeting. VI. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED AS PRESENTED Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce approving the consent agenda as presented: VI.A. Approve minutes of the Regular Meeting of September 21, 2021 VI.B. Approve Claims for Payment for Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated September 24, 2021, totaling $1,503,314.30, Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated September 30, 2021, totaling $2,985.00, and Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated October 1, 2021, totaling $ 1,132,606.41 VI.C. Petition Response for Wooddale Avenue Speed Bump VI.D. Adopt Resolution No. 2021-87; Setting Public Hearing Date for Proposed Spending Plan for the Southdale 2, Pentagon Park, and 70th and Cahill Tax Increment Financing Districts VI.E. Request for Purchase; Dispatch Radio Support Services, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Motorola Solutions, $45,722 VI.F. Approve Amendment to 911 Dispatch Services Agreement with the City of Richfield VI.G. Adopt Resolution No. 2021-93; Resolution Identifying the Need for Livable Communities Demonstration Account Funding and Authorizing Application for Grant Funds VI.H. Adopt Resolution No. 2021-90; Accepting Donations Rollcall: Minutes/Edina City Council/October 5, 2021 Page 2 Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, and Hovland Motion carried. VII. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS VII.A. HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF DAVID HUTCHINSON UPDATE – RECEIVED Hennepin County Sheriff David Hutchinson updated the Council on activities in the Sheriff's Office. The Council thanked Sheriff Hutchinson for the partnership that existed. VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS - Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VIII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-88, PRELIMINARY REZONING AND PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH MULTIPLE VARIANCES FOR CITY HOMES AT 4630 FRANCE AVENUE – CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 19, 2021 Community Development Director Teague stated on September 22, 2021, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the request per staff recommendation, which included denial of the rear yard setback and the building coverage variance for a redevelopment proposal to tear down the existing single- family home and construct two villa style homes at 4630 France Avenue. He outlined the request in detail which included a shared driveway off France Avenue which would provide access for both homes. Jeff Ziebarth, Perkins+Wills, shared about the proposed project that would provide an alternative housing product for the City with house plans that were more user-friendly at a reduced size and other elements. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. Public Testimony Scott Fischmann, 4613 Meadow Road, addressed the Council. Laura Westlund, 4626 France Avenue South, addressed the Council. Katherine Winston, 4634 France Avenue South, addressed the Council. Heather Isaacs, 4640 France Avenue South, addressed the Council. Steve Brown, 5528 Halifax Lane, addressed the Council. Roberta Castellano, 4854 France Avenue South, addressed the Council. Maureen Millea Smith, 4820 Townes Road, addressed the Council. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Anderson, to extend the public hearing to noon on October 11, 2021, and take final action on Resolution No. 2021-88 approving preliminary rezoning from R-1, single-dwelling unit district to PRD-2 planned residential district, preliminary plat, side yard setback variance from 20 feet to 7 feet and 15 feet, lot size variance from 7,300 sf to 5,016 sf and denial of the rear yard setback variance from 35 feet to 25 feet and the building coverage variance from 25% to 26% at 4630 France Avenue at the October 19, 2021, Council meeting. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, and Hovland Motion carried. VIII.B. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-89, SITE PLAN REVIEW WITH VARIANCES AT 6500 BARRIE ROAD – CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 19, 2021 Minutes/Edina City Council/October 5, 2021 Page 3 Mr. Teague stated the City Council was asked to hold a public hearing, consider a redevelopment proposal to tear down the existing 16,032 square foot medical office building, and build a new 3-story, 24,000 square foot medical office and surgery center. He outlined the current site and said the height overlay district allowed up to 12 stories. The site was very small and narrow for a medical office site and given the required setbacks, a variance would be likely for any new structure. He outlined the request in detail, the site plan review and variances to front and side yard setbacks, building coverage, floor area ratio, and parking stalls. Don Rolf, Pope Architects, presented further about the proposed project. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:23 p.m. Public Testimony Linda Schmitz, 6483 Barrie Road, addressed the Council. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, to extend the public hearing to noon on October 11, 2021, and take final action on Resolution No. 2021-89 approving a site plan review with variances at 6500 Barrie Road for construction of a new medical office and surgery center at the October 19, 2021, Council meeting. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, and Hovland Motion carried. VIII.C. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-85, WEST 58TH STREET NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-456 – CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 19, 2021 City Engineering Millner shared the proposed project area for the West 58th Street project then reviewed the intense public engagement process. He spoke about the France Avenue traffic signal and turf establishment and referred to one objection received by the property owner at 5733 Beard Avenue who was instructed on the process. He outlined the costs and assessable portion of $361,129.65 with a per REU rate of $9,653.29, a 2.5% decrease in the estimate. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:37 p.m. Public Testimony None. Member Anderson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, to extend the public hearing to noon on October 11, 2021, and take final action Resolution No. 2021-85 levying special assessments for public improvements at the October 19, 2021, Council meeting. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, and Hovland Motion carried. VIII.D. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-80, WEED MOVING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, IMPROVEMENT NO. WD-21 – CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 19, 2021 Assistant Director Parks and Natural Resources Swenson stated in the fall of 2020 and summer of 2021, the Parks & Recreation Maintenance Department cut the weeds on 12 properties. The properties and cost associated with the use of a tractor and staff time to cut the weeds was provided. Each cost should be assessed to the property owner for the payment to the City and shared the proposed assessments for each property. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:40 p.m. Minutes/Edina City Council/October 5, 2021 Page 4 Public Testimony None. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, to extend the public hearing to noon on October 11, 2021, and take final action on Resolution No. 2021-80 levying special assessments for Improvement No. WD-21 weed mowing at the October 19, 2021, Council meeting. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, and Hovland Motion carried. VIII.E. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-81, TREE REMOVAL SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, IMPROVEMENT NO. TR-21 – CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 19, 2021 Mr. Swenson stated the list of properties collectively had diseased trees that were removed in accordance with City Code. All property owners were first given an opportunity to remove any diseased trees within a three-week period of time. If the trees were not removed within the period of time, the City then contracts the removal and assesses the property owner. He shared that the property owners listed in the proposed assessment roll chose to have the City contract to remove their trees in 2020 and 2021 and stated the practice prevented the spread of tree diseases or was completed for safety. He outlined the guidelines used to set the assessment and said additional time was allotted for payment if requested. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:44 p.m. Public Testimony Dr. Vicki Thomson, 7 Woodland Road, addressed the Council. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. City Forester Overholt explained reasons for the assessment cost for a particular tree removal which involved use of a crane. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, to extend the public hearing to noon on October 11, 2021, and take final action on Resolution No. 2021-81 levying special assessments for Improvement No. TR-21 tree removal at the October 19, 2021, Council meeting. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton and Hovland Motion carried. VIII.F. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-82, GRANDVIEW BUSINESS DISTRICT SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, IMPROVEMENT NO. G-21 – CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 19, 2021 Mr. Swenson shared the proposed assessment roll and documentation for the Grandview Business District maintenance assessment. He said the amount changed from $0.00617 per square foot in 2020 to $0.0010013 in 2021 and that as of today no comments had been submitted. He shared assessment history and breakdown of proposed assessments. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:03 p.m. Public Testimony None. Minutes/Edina City Council/October 5, 2021 Page 5 Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, to extend the public hearing to noon on October 11, 2021, and take final action on Resolution No. 2021-82 levying special assessments for public improvements at the October 19, 2021, Council meeting. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, and Hovland Motion carried. VIII.G. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-83, AQUATIC VEGETATION SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ-21 – CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 19, 2021 Water Resources Coordinator Wilson shared about the proposed aquatic vegetation special assessment for aquatic vegetation management services in Arrowhead Lake, Indianhead Lake, Lake Nancy, and Minnehaha Creek Mill Pond as requested by groups eligible for the service. She said these groups agreed to pay for the services by special assessment then outlined the change to the assessment period last year that simplified the assessment preparation process. She shared more detail on the services provided and said waterbodies were eligible for City-funded algae treatments and had been credited accordingly. She shared the price per REU for Arrowhead Lake, Indianhead Lake, Lake Nancy, and Mill Pond. Ms. Wilson discussed Mill Pond services and ramp condition for harvesting access. Ms. Wilson recommended that for services to continue beyond 2023, the residents must form an association consistent with the 2015 Lakes & Ponds policy amendment to the Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:19 p.m. Public Testimony None. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Anderson, to extend the public hearing to noon on October 11, 2021, and take final action on Resolution No. 2021-83 levying special assessments for public improvements at the October 19, 2021, Council meeting. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, and Hovland Motion carried. VIII.H. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-84, 50TH AND FRANCE BUSINESS DISTRICT SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, IMPROVEMENT NO. M-21 – CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 19, 2021 Facility Manager Otten stated the City provided service to the 50th & France Business District. These services included general maintenance and upkeep performed by City employees and management of contracts for other repairs as needed. Services included waste and litter removal, snow and ice management, and upkeep to City owned spaces throughout the district. He shared how the maintenance assessment changed from $0.81503 per square foot in 2020 to $0.98472 per square foot in 2021 which was attributed to additional maintenance requirements of the Nolan Mains Complex and COVID-19 precautions then noted as of today no comments had been submitted. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:23 p.m. Public Testimony None. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, to extend the public hearing to noon on October 11, 2021, and take final action on Resolution No. 2021-84 levying special assessments for public improvements at the October 19, 2021, Council meeting. Rollcall: Minutes/Edina City Council/October 5, 2021 Page 6 Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, and Hovland Motion carried. VIII.I. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-86, 50TH AND FRANCE BUSINESS DISTRICT SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, IMPROVEMENT NO. M-21- CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 19, 2021 Finance Director McAndrews shared the proposed assessments to certify the delinquent utility accounts for collection with 2022 real estate taxes. She reviewed the process based on Statute which included notification and said property owners could pay until November 19 to avoid assessments. She said the certified amounts would be paid at an interest rate of 6.5% for one-year assessments then reviewed utility certification history since 2016. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:33 p.m. Public Testimony None. Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson, to extend the public hearing to noon on October 11, 2021, and take final action on Resolution No. 2021-86 authorizing the certification of delinquent utility charges to the Hennepin County auditor at the October 19, 2021, Council meeting. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, and Hovland Motion carried. IX. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS IX.A. 2022 BOARD AND COMMISSION INTERVIEW PROCESS – REVIEWED Community Engagement Coordinator Lamon stated staff was seeking feedback from Council on how to proceed with the 2022 Board and Commission interview process. Staff reviewed background of the current process, goals, and recruitment strategy for 2022. The Council asked questions and provided feedback that supported a panel of two council members and two commissioners with no recording of interviews. X. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS - Received X.A. MINUTES: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION, JULY 13, 2021 X.B. MINUTES: TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, AUGUST 19, 2021 X.C. MINUTES: HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION, AUGUST 24, 2021 X.D. MINUTES: ARTS AND CULTURE COMMISSION, AUGUST 26, 2021 XI. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE – Received XII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received XIII. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received XIV. CALENDAR OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AND EVENTS – Received XV. ADJOURNMENT Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, to adjourn the meeting at 10:23 p.m. Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, and Hovland. Minutes/Edina City Council/October 5, 2021 Page 7 Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, October 19, 2021. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the October 5, 2021, meeting available. Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Claims From:Alisha McAndrews, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Approve Payment of Claims Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve claims for payment: Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 10.08.21 TOTAL $3,262,296.28 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 10.15.21 TOTAL $2,156,578.05 INTRODUCTION: Claims information for approval is attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 10.08.21 TOTAL $3,262,296.28 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 10.15.21 TOTAL $2,156,578.05 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 40 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND SUB FUND DUE TO DUE FR 1000 General 947,174.502300 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety 14,018.302500 Conservation & Sustainability 52.502600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 26,532.502600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 637.502600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 636.002600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 1,830.002600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 185,930.182600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 223,262.914000 Capital Projects 75,139.414200 Equipment Replacement 56,676.064400 PIR Capital Projects 246,716.115200 Braemar Golf Course 14,684.415200 Braemar Golf Course 1,225.745300 Aquatic Center 1,932.805400 Edinborough Park 650.675500 Braemar Arena 9,373.805600 Braemar Field 72.005700 Centennial Lakes 6,639.005800 Liquor 155,855.375900 Utility Fund 344,924.785900 Utility Fund 11,468.455900 Utility Fund 446,289.505900 Utility Fund 1,320.006000 Risk Management 28,022.196100 Equipment Operations 36,063.626200 Information Technology 871.276300 Facilities Management 5,804.007100 PS Training Facility 1,540.407200 MN Task Force 1 11,417.769000 Payroll 428,471.459999 Pooled Cash Fund 3,262,296.28 TOTAL 3,262,296.28 3,262,296.28 ** END OF REPORT - Generated by Shirleng Tan Geil ** City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 1 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465278 10/08/2021 PRTD 151171 7TH STREET BEER COMPANY 1803 09/22/2021 20211008 912.00 CHECK 465278 TOTAL: 912.00 465279 10/08/2021 PRTD 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 0168532-IN 08/31/2021 20211008 -482.95 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 0168530-IN 08/31/2021 20211008 434.12 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 0152497 09/08/2021 20211008 63.04 CHECK 465279 TOTAL: 14.21 465280 10/08/2021 PRTD 129458 ACME ELECTRIC MOTOR INC 9102641 09/07/2021 20211008 273.91 ACME ELECTRIC MOTOR INC 17506326-000 09/09/2021 20211008 75.94 ACME ELECTRIC MOTOR INC 17508241-0 09/09/2021 20211008 37.97 CHECK 465280 TOTAL: 387.82 465281 10/08/2021 PRTD 160119 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL 3364462 09/07/2021 20211008 269.00 CHECK 465281 TOTAL: 269.00 465282 10/08/2021 PRTD 160201 TB GLASS 8115 09/13/2021 20211008 337.50 CHECK 465282 TOTAL: 337.50 465283 10/08/2021 PRTD 100575 AMERICAN CYLINDER LLC 190524 08/30/2021 20211008 33.30 CHECK 465283 TOTAL: 33.30 465284 10/08/2021 PRTD 160095 AM CRAFT SPIRITS SALES & MARKETIN 13049 09/21/2021 20211008 66.99 CHECK 465284 TOTAL: 66.99 465285 10/08/2021 PRTD 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 16XL-4J4D-3KT7 09/08/2021 20211008 169.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1XRM-RRLM-4L7X 09/08/2021 20211008 142.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1H9P-6TLV-7RHM 09/08/2021 20211008 439.78 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1VYD-J94L-D3RX 09/08/2021 20211008 70.93 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1TVW-TGWK-DK37 09/08/2021 20211008 362.16 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 2 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 16V7-T3HH-N3LN 09/09/2021 20211008 50.43 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 19QJ-CKF9-J3PP 09/10/2021 20211008 110.33 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1XNX-R4CW-RPHV 09/11/2021 20211008 15.27 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1J14-YHNW-T4HG 09/11/2021 20211008 243.88 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1C9Q-4H46-X6R9 09/11/2021 20211008 187.18 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 174Q-R9YK-WXDJ 09/11/2021 20211008 23.59 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 13X4-3FP6-7M17 09/12/2021 20211008 81.59 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1QRQ-9R16-CXFP 09/12/2021 20211008 315.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1WYR-H9RG-NXWJ 09/13/2021 20211008 1,225.74 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1TF6-DVMW-MNHC 09/13/2021 20211008 28.84 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 14VJ-V3CG-7LFM 09/13/2021 20211008 39.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1DPJ-TQF9-9GTC 09/13/2021 20211008 198.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1F4R-NYG1-CCVD 09/13/2021 20211008 46.78 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1CL1-RFNW-DGC6 09/13/2021 20211008 67.15 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1F4R-NYG1-CTP4 09/13/2021 20211008 299.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1WQC-CYV1-HCDM 09/21/2021 20211008 -24.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1R36-N3WR-HM7H 09/24/2021 20211008 -43.59 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 11W3-JQ7V-HCN1 09/24/2021 20211008 -35.99 CHECK 465285 TOTAL: 4,014.03 465286 10/08/2021 PRTD 118491 APPLE INC AF38196018 09/10/2021 20211008 329.00 CHECK 465286 TOTAL: 329.00 465287 10/08/2021 PRTD 151441 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 1005137540 09/07/2021 20211008 178.13 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 1005139410 09/08/2021 20211008 349.71 CHECK 465287 TOTAL: 527.84 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 3 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465288 10/08/2021 PRTD 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA S1406543-090121 09/01/2021 20211008 6,514.69 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA S1405453-090121 09/01/2021 20211008 2,658.32 CHECK 465288 TOTAL: 9,173.01 465289 10/08/2021 PRTD 100636 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 01P47843 09/08/2021 20211008 46.07 CHECK 465289 TOTAL: 46.07 465290 10/08/2021 PRTD 151126 DANIEL Q MCDOWELL JR AND JENNIFER AUG 2021 09/10/2021 20211008 315.00 CHECK 465290 TOTAL: 315.00 465291 10/08/2021 PRTD 101718 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS OVERPAY-8/23/19 07/20/2021 20211008 -124.36 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS OVERPAY-9/17/19 07/20/2021 20211008 -203.84 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 38010588 NOA 07/20/2021 20211008 -263.37 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 380070944 08/26/2021 20211008 49.39 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 380071212 08/27/2021 20211008 10.44 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 380071117 08/27/2021 20211008 35.86 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 380071886 09/01/2021 20211008 11.20 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 380072025 09/01/2021 20211008 6.82 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 380072264 09/03/2021 20211008 7.69 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 380073474 09/14/2021 20211008 290.39 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 380073746 09/15/2021 20211008 30.51 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 380073848 09/15/2021 20211008 49.80 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 380073824 09/15/2021 20211008 50.02 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 380073889 09/15/2021 20211008 17.92 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 380073791 09/15/2021 20211008 10.72 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 380074043 09/16/2021 20211008 3.29 AUTO PLUS - FORMERLY PARTS PLUS 380074263 09/17/2021 20211008 21.60 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 4 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465291 TOTAL: 4.08 465292 10/08/2021 PRTD 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23271869.00-4 09/07/2021 20211008 146,504.18 CHECK 465292 TOTAL: 146,504.18 465293 10/08/2021 PRTD 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC 602187 09/10/2021 20211008 300.64 CHECK 465293 TOTAL: 300.64 465294 10/08/2021 PRTD 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0091386500 09/23/2021 20211008 432.20 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0103974300 09/23/2021 20211008 48.07 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0091415100 09/23/2021 20211008 3,550.30 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0091421100 09/23/2021 20211008 4,512.13 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0103974400 09/23/2021 20211008 127.08 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0091387400 09/23/2021 20211008 89.55 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0103974500 09/23/2021 20211008 120.55 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0091386900 09/23/2021 20211008 269.10 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0091414100 09/23/2021 20211008 2,735.90 CHECK 465294 TOTAL: 11,884.88 465295 10/08/2021 PRTD 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 14397 09/15/2021 20211008 189.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 14396 09/15/2021 20211008 496.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 14486 09/23/2021 20211008 469.00 CHECK 465295 TOTAL: 1,154.00 465296 10/08/2021 PRTD 125268 BLUE COMPACTOR SERVICES LLC 10006 09/04/2021 20211008 386.00 CHECK 465296 TOTAL: 386.00 465297 10/08/2021 PRTD 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC 0275480 09/08/2021 20211008 6,452.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 5 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465297 TOTAL: 6,452.00 465298 10/08/2021 PRTD 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84197077 09/07/2021 20211008 119.88 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84197076 09/07/2021 20211008 1,720.00 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84200900 09/09/2021 20211008 430.00 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84204917 09/13/2021 20211008 475.80 CHECK 465298 TOTAL: 2,745.68 465299 10/08/2021 PRTD 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 180983 09/21/2021 20211008 580.75 BOURGET IMPORTS 180982 09/21/2021 20211008 1,502.02 BOURGET IMPORTS 180984 09/21/2021 20211008 594.50 CHECK 465299 TOTAL: 2,677.27 465300 10/08/2021 PRTD 117040 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC 005S3524 09/08/2021 20211008 1,062.77 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC 008P3067 09/10/2021 20211008 67.23 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC 008P3065 09/10/2021 20211008 16.92 CHECK 465300 TOTAL: 1,146.92 465301 10/08/2021 PRTD 117040 ALLIANCE PARTS TRUCK AND TRAILER 07P12022 08/04/2021 20211008 -77.74 ALLIANCE PARTS TRUCK AND TRAILER 007P16359 09/27/2021 20211008 93.24 CHECK 465301 TOTAL: 15.50 465302 10/08/2021 PRTD 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION B265450 09/08/2021 20211008 6,449.00 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION B265915 09/10/2021 20211008 1,734.00 CHECK 465302 TOTAL: 8,183.00 465303 10/08/2021 PRTD 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341121979 09/22/2021 20211008 178.95 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341121981 09/22/2021 20211008 195.90 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341121982 09/22/2021 20211008 1,525.48 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 6 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341121980 09/22/2021 20211008 2,818.26 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 408748136 06/23/2021 20211008 -14.00 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 408722886 06/15/2021 20211008 -56.22 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341121984 09/22/2021 20211008 195.96 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341121986 09/22/2021 20211008 169.25 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341121985 09/22/2021 20211008 742.29 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 360310762 09/16/2021 20211008 -3.60 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341121956 09/22/2021 20211008 789.50 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341121959 09/22/2021 20211008 716.50 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341121958 09/22/2021 20211008 169.25 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341121962 09/22/2021 20211008 2,357.37 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341121957 09/22/2021 20211008 3,115.24 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341121960 09/22/2021 20211008 68.51 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341121961 09/22/2021 20211008 1,260.15 CHECK 465303 TOTAL: 14,228.79 465304 10/08/2021 PRTD 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 341080481 09/14/2021 20211008 2,649.50 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 341080399 09/14/2021 20211008 3,267.05 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 341121983 09/22/2021 20211008 178.95 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 341143297 09/21/2021 20211008 4,890.00 CHECK 465304 TOTAL: 10,985.50 465305 10/08/2021 PRTD 139440 BRENT RICHTER CONSULTING LLC 21-2054 08/19/2021 20211008 500.00 CHECK 465305 TOTAL: 500.00 465306 10/08/2021 PRTD 160173 BRIDGEWATER BANK MAY TIFF PYMT 05/17/2021 20211008 223,262.91 CHECK 465306 TOTAL: 223,262.91 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 7 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465307 10/08/2021 PRTD 100648 BERTELSON BROTHERS INC WO-1145915-1 09/10/2021 20211008 34.30 CHECK 465307 TOTAL: 34.30 465308 10/08/2021 PRTD 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2597378 09/17/2021 20211008 1,926.15 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2597382 09/17/2021 20211008 58.50 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2597383 09/17/2021 20211008 170.98 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2597384 09/17/2021 20211008 2,387.12 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2598289 09/21/2021 20211008 36.99 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2598288 09/21/2021 20211008 58.50 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 19050027 09/20/2021 20211008 -328.70 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2600403 09/24/2021 20211008 -72.00 CHECK 465308 TOTAL: 4,237.54 465309 10/08/2021 PRTD 148017 CARBON DAY AUTOMOTIVE 2921 09/10/2021 20211008 52.50 CHECK 465309 TOTAL: 52.50 465310 10/08/2021 PRTD 160207 JASON THOMAS CARDINAL 24156 09/08/2021 20211008 1,900.00 CHECK 465310 TOTAL: 1,900.00 465311 10/08/2021 PRTD 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY C2411565 09/09/2021 20211008 1,160.00 CHECK 465311 TOTAL: 1,160.00 465312 10/08/2021 PRTD 105497 CENTRAL ROOFING COMPANY 29176 09/13/2021 20211008 1,127.00 CHECK 465312 TOTAL: 1,127.00 465313 10/08/2021 PRTD 142533 CADD ENGR SUPPLY INC INV131670 09/10/2021 20211008 95.00 CHECK 465313 TOTAL: 95.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 8 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465314 10/08/2021 PRTD 100683 CHEMSEARCH 7501492 09/08/2021 20211008 657.22 CHECK 465314 TOTAL: 657.22 465315 10/08/2021 PRTD 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 4094989187 09/07/2021 20211008 52.53 CINTAS CORPORATION 4094989188 09/07/2021 20211008 17.52 CINTAS CORPORATION 4094989119 09/07/2021 20211008 68.69 CINTAS CORPORATION 4094989525 09/07/2021 20211008 34.88 CINTAS CORPORATION 4095636048 09/13/2021 20211008 33.05 CINTAS CORPORATION 4095636064 09/13/2021 20211008 11.78 CINTAS CORPORATION 4095636047 09/13/2021 20211008 34.88 CINTAS CORPORATION 4095636104 09/13/2021 20211008 27.65 CINTAS CORPORATION 4095636145 09/13/2021 20211008 97.63 CINTAS CORPORATION 4096222030 09/17/2021 20211008 81.48 CHECK 465315 TOTAL: 460.09 465316 10/08/2021 PRTD 101837 CITY OF EDINA COM-2461 08/12/2021 20211008 100.00 CHECK 465316 TOTAL: 100.00 465317 10/08/2021 PRTD 101837 CITY OF EDINA COM-2484 09/12/2021 20211008 100.00 CHECK 465317 TOTAL: 100.00 465318 10/08/2021 PRTD 139927 CITY OF ROCHESTER MN 24893-MNTF1 09/02/2021 20211008 8,432.90 CHECK 465318 TOTAL: 8,432.90 465319 10/08/2021 PRTD 146213 WESTWOOD HILLS NATURE CENTER 1678 06/30/2021 20211008 203.50 CHECK 465319 TOTAL: 203.50 465320 10/08/2021 PRTD 146472 CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE OF MN 42009001439 08/31/2021 20211008 1,140.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 9 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465320 TOTAL: 1,140.00 465321 10/08/2021 PRTD 120433 COMCAST HOLDINGS CORPORATION 0373022-9/2021 09/17/2021 20211008 33.79 CHECK 465321 TOTAL: 33.79 465322 10/08/2021 PRTD 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC 0211882-IN 09/10/2021 20211008 504.80 CHECK 465322 TOTAL: 504.80 465323 10/08/2021 PRTD 100012 CORE & MAIN P570363 09/10/2021 20211008 439.82 CHECK 465323 TOTAL: 439.82 465324 10/08/2021 PRTD 140999 CORE-MARK MIDCONTINENT INC 8385735 09/10/2021 20211008 591.95 CHECK 465324 TOTAL: 591.95 465325 10/08/2021 PRTD 151181 CORRECTIVE ASPHALT MATERALS, LLC 21083S 09/03/2021 20211008 164,369.96 CHECK 465325 TOTAL: 164,369.96 465326 10/08/2021 PRTD 121668 CROWN PACKAGING CORP 2975915 09/07/2021 20211008 925.42 CHECK 465326 TOTAL: 925.42 465327 10/08/2021 PRTD 119214 CUSTOM HOSE TECH 107808 09/08/2021 20211008 390.31 CHECK 465327 TOTAL: 390.31 465328 10/08/2021 PRTD 100130 DAKOTA COUNTY 24891 09/23/2021 20211008 990.66 CHECK 465328 TOTAL: 990.66 465329 10/08/2021 PRTD 104020 DALCO ENTERPRISES INC 3826993 09/07/2021 20211008 193.28 CHECK 465329 TOTAL: 193.28 465330 10/08/2021 PRTD 102195 DAY INVESTMENTS LLC p43410702 09/07/2021 20211008 39.98 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 10 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465330 TOTAL: 39.98 465331 10/08/2021 PRTD 100718 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 72752/1 09/08/2021 20211008 836.23 CHECK 465331 TOTAL: 836.23 465332 10/08/2021 PRTD 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3690291 09/10/2021 20211008 19,810.00 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3690290 09/10/2021 20211008 4,117.00 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3690289 09/10/2021 20211008 1,591.50 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3690288 09/10/2021 20211008 874.50 CHECK 465332 TOTAL: 26,393.00 465333 10/08/2021 PRTD 150827 DRASTIC MEASURES BREWING, LLC 1610 09/22/2021 20211008 312.00 CHECK 465333 TOTAL: 312.00 465334 10/08/2021 PRTD 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 853016 09/09/2021 20211008 53.55 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 853017 09/09/2021 20211008 89.25 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 853018 09/09/2021 20211008 83.30 CHECK 465334 TOTAL: 226.10 465335 10/08/2021 PRTD 101341 EDINA FIREFIGHTER'S RELIEF ASSOCI EFRA Supplement 202109/22/2021 20211008 21,000.00 EDINA FIREFIGHTER'S RELIEF ASSOCI 25838 10/05/2021 20211008 643,483.28 CHECK 465335 TOTAL: 664,483.28 465336 10/08/2021 PRTD 103594 EDINALARM INC 67772 08/23/2021 20211008 386.38 CHECK 465336 TOTAL: 386.38 465337 10/08/2021 PRTD 105906 EGAN COMPANY JC10226058 09/08/2021 20211008 5,881.93 CHECK 465337 TOTAL: 5,881.93 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 11 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465338 10/08/2021 PRTD 100049 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES 88166 09/09/2021 20211008 382.50 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES 88167 09/09/2021 20211008 637.50 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES 88246 09/09/2021 20211008 6,000.00 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES 88163 09/09/2021 20211008 2,000.00 CHECK 465338 TOTAL: 9,020.00 465339 10/08/2021 PRTD 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 2280921 09/07/2021 20211008 933.20 CHECK 465339 TOTAL: 933.20 465340 10/08/2021 PRTD 100146 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-427837 09/08/2021 20211008 58.88 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-7130114 09/08/2021 20211008 154.08 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-7126815 09/07/2021 20211008 291.04 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-7126794 09/07/2021 20211008 92.72 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-427674 09/07/2021 20211008 49.71 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-428014 09/09/2021 20211008 31.24 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-7132868 09/09/2021 20211008 319.92 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-7138480 09/13/2021 20211008 83.58 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-428301 09/13/2021 20211008 83.58 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-428381 09/13/2021 20211008 47.88 CHECK 465340 TOTAL: 1,212.63 465341 10/08/2021 PRTD 147181 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-4546 09/22/2021 20211008 180.00 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-4545 09/22/2021 20211008 180.00 CHECK 465341 TOTAL: 360.00 465342 10/08/2021 PRTD 103600 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0481825 09/10/2021 20211008 1,174.90 CHECK 465342 TOTAL: 1,174.90 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 12 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465343 10/08/2021 PRTD 160036 FIRST HOSPITAL LABORATORIES, INC. FL00469847 09/02/2021 20211008 167.08 FIRST HOSPITAL LABORATORIES, INC. FL00464895 08/04/2021 20211008 222.43 FIRST HOSPITAL LABORATORIES, INC. FL00459876 07/07/2021 20211008 337.25 FIRST HOSPITAL LABORATORIES, INC. FL00437988 05/06/2021 20211008 55.35 FIRST HOSPITAL LABORATORIES, INC. FL00432946 04/06/2021 20211008 110.70 CHECK 465343 TOTAL: 892.81 465344 10/08/2021 PRTD 132866 SAWTOOTH HOLDINGS F9100 09/13/2021 20211008 2,016.00 CHECK 465344 TOTAL: 2,016.00 465345 10/08/2021 PRTD 102456 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1437892 09/07/2021 20211008 621.83 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1442570 09/13/2021 20211008 112.95 CHECK 465345 TOTAL: 734.78 465346 10/08/2021 PRTD 101351 GILBERT MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS LL 58065 09/07/2021 20211008 1,563.15 CHECK 465346 TOTAL: 1,563.15 465347 10/08/2021 PRTD 101103 WW GRAINGER 9047338000 09/08/2021 20211008 12.78 WW GRAINGER 9047965257 09/09/2021 20211008 18.82 WW GRAINGER 9050232322 09/10/2021 20211008 28.84 WW GRAINGER 9050443804 09/10/2021 20211008 149.00 CHECK 465347 TOTAL: 209.44 465348 10/08/2021 PRTD 144412 WINEBOW MN00100824 09/17/2021 20211008 1,120.00 WINEBOW MN00100798 09/17/2021 20211008 1,120.00 WINEBOW MN00100926 09/21/2021 20211008 1,374.00 WINEBOW MN00100925 09/21/2021 20211008 168.00 WINEBOW MN00100812 09/17/2021 20211008 1,120.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 13 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET WINEBOW MN00100913 09/21/2021 20211008 1,050.00 WINEBOW MN00100912 09/21/2021 20211008 283.02 WINEBOW MN00100914 09/21/2021 20211008 1,229.00 CHECK 465348 TOTAL: 7,464.02 465349 10/08/2021 PRTD 122093 GROUP HEALTHPLAN INC 107403573 09/09/2021 20211008 428,471.45 GROUP HEALTHPLAN INC 107376510 09/09/2021 20211008 28,022.19 CHECK 465349 TOTAL: 456,493.64 465350 10/08/2021 PRTD 141925 GS SYSTEMS INC AND AFFILIATES INV23705 09/10/2021 20211008 495.00 CHECK 465350 TOTAL: 495.00 465351 10/08/2021 PRTD 100790 HACH COMPANY 12562387 07/26/2021 20211008 258.48 CHECK 465351 TOTAL: 258.48 465352 10/08/2021 PRTD 151168 HAMMER SPORTS LLC 564 09/12/2021 20211008 118.00 CHECK 465352 TOTAL: 118.00 465353 10/08/2021 PRTD 100798 HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIPMENT COMPANY R0088301 09/13/2021 20211008 7,900.00 CHECK 465353 TOTAL: 7,900.00 465354 10/08/2021 PRTD 143563 HEADFLYER BREWING E-3096 09/21/2021 20211008 126.00 CHECK 465354 TOTAL: 126.00 465355 10/08/2021 PRTD 103085 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000170759 09/15/2021 20211008 1,098.03 CHECK 465355 TOTAL: 1,098.03 465356 10/08/2021 PRTD 118765 HENRY SCHEIN INC 98597328 09/10/2021 20211008 378.00 CHECK 465356 TOTAL: 378.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 14 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465357 10/08/2021 PRTD 102484 HIRSHFIELDS PAINT MANUFACTURING I 0012200-IN 09/09/2021 20211008 850.32 CHECK 465357 TOTAL: 850.32 465358 10/08/2021 PRTD 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC 444759 09/21/2021 20211008 66.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 444258 09/21/2021 20211008 433.50 HOHENSTEINS INC 444259 09/21/2021 20211008 110.40 HOHENSTEINS INC 444260 09/21/2021 20211008 1,452.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 444261 09/21/2021 20211008 742.50 HOHENSTEINS INC 444262 09/21/2021 20211008 120.00 CHECK 465358 TOTAL: 2,924.40 465359 10/08/2021 PRTD 100417 HORIZON CHEMICAL CO 210726033-EO 09/08/2021 20211008 211.24 HORIZON CHEMICAL CO 210903056-EO 09/08/2021 20211008 650.67 CHECK 465359 TOTAL: 861.91 465360 10/08/2021 PRTD 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 105464 09/21/2021 20211008 820.05 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 105451 09/21/2021 20211008 164.80 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 105452 09/21/2021 20211008 697.10 CHECK 465360 TOTAL: 1,681.95 465361 10/08/2021 PRTD 146407 INGCO INTERNATIONAL 600561 09/10/2021 20211008 400.00 CHECK 465361 TOTAL: 400.00 465362 10/08/2021 PRTD 150898 INVICTUS BREWING INC 3509 09/16/2021 20211008 186.00 INVICTUS BREWING INC 3533 09/22/2021 20211008 93.00 CHECK 465362 TOTAL: 279.00 465363 10/08/2021 PRTD 100823 J & F REDDY RENTS INC 110089-2 09/07/2021 20211008 264.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 15 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465363 TOTAL: 264.00 465364 10/08/2021 PRTD 102146 JESSEN PRESS INC 687462 09/13/2021 20211008 447.00 CHECK 465364 TOTAL: 447.00 465365 10/08/2021 PRTD 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC 190855 09/13/2021 20211008 73.12 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC 190856 09/13/2021 20211008 73.12 CHECK 465365 TOTAL: 146.24 465366 10/08/2021 PRTD 100741 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3224356 09/22/2021 20211008 1,696.40 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3224357 09/22/2021 20211008 64.50 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3224354 09/22/2021 20211008 917.00 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3224358 09/22/2021 20211008 3,568.40 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3169861 06/29/2021 20211008 -316.80 CHECK 465366 TOTAL: 5,929.50 465367 10/08/2021 PRTD 100835 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3497978 09/23/2021 20211008 2,147.30 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3497977 09/23/2021 20211008 40.00 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3497976 09/23/2021 20211008 1,453.90 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3497975 09/23/2021 20211008 2,155.55 CHECK 465367 TOTAL: 5,796.75 465368 10/08/2021 PRTD 100835 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6275864 09/23/2021 20211008 712.48 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6275866 09/23/2021 20211008 1,304.57 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6275867 09/23/2021 20211008 243.57 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6275868 09/23/2021 20211008 68.69 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6275860 09/23/2021 20211008 1,258.09 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6275859 09/23/2021 20211008 224.18 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6275858 09/23/2021 20211008 4,497.39 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 16 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6275857 09/23/2021 20211008 950.29 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6275853 09/23/2021 20211008 1,038.85 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6275854 09/23/2021 20211008 1,051.34 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6275855 09/23/2021 20211008 218.05 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6275856 09/23/2021 20211008 382.38 CHECK 465368 TOTAL: 11,949.88 465369 10/08/2021 PRTD 100835 WINE MERCHANTS 7347870 09/23/2021 20211008 416.19 WINE MERCHANTS 7347872 09/23/2021 20211008 604.76 WINE MERCHANTS 7347871 09/23/2021 20211008 2,462.61 WINE MERCHANTS 7347869 09/23/2021 20211008 416.19 WINE MERCHANTS 7347866 09/23/2021 20211008 48.38 WINE MERCHANTS 7347867 09/23/2021 20211008 4,111.47 WINE MERCHANTS 7347868 09/23/2021 20211008 416.19 CHECK 465369 TOTAL: 8,475.79 465370 10/08/2021 PRTD 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1887655 09/14/2021 20211008 415.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1894661 09/23/2021 20211008 1,997.12 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1894665 09/23/2021 20211008 306.38 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1894657 09/23/2021 20211008 91.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1894664 09/23/2021 20211008 517.04 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1894663 09/23/2021 20211008 297.60 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1894662 09/23/2021 20211008 257.09 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1894660 09/23/2021 20211008 1,120.82 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1894659 09/23/2021 20211008 127.08 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1894658 09/23/2021 20211008 905.17 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1894666 09/23/2021 20211008 29.19 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 17 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1894653 09/23/2021 20211008 1,875.19 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1894652 09/23/2021 20211008 205.76 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1894651 09/23/2021 20211008 672.50 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1894650 09/23/2021 20211008 2,013.16 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1894649 09/23/2021 20211008 1,258.68 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1894648 09/23/2021 20211008 759.51 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1894641 09/23/2021 20211008 773.92 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1894642 09/23/2021 20211008 1,820.23 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1894643 09/23/2021 20211008 1,243.93 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1894644 09/23/2021 20211008 594.60 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1894645 09/23/2021 20211008 91.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1894646 09/23/2021 20211008 1,558.61 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1894647 09/23/2021 20211008 133.32 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 164214 09/16/2021 20211008 -14.16 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 164216 09/16/2021 20211008 -3.33 CHECK 465370 TOTAL: 19,046.41 465371 10/08/2021 PRTD 103409 KELBRO COMPANY 2679329 09/23/2021 20211008 72.40 CHECK 465371 TOTAL: 72.40 465372 10/08/2021 PRTD 160105 KILLMER ELECTRIC CO., INC. W16432 09/08/2021 20211008 6,200.96 KILLMER ELECTRIC CO., INC. W16470 09/10/2021 20211008 295.80 CHECK 465372 TOTAL: 6,496.76 465373 10/08/2021 PRTD 100944 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 140312 09/21/2021 20211008 923.25 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 140300 09/21/2021 20211008 1,720.75 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 140292 09/21/2021 20211008 913.70 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 18 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 140290 09/21/2021 20211008 1,345.00 CHECK 465373 TOTAL: 4,902.70 465374 10/08/2021 PRTD 144983 KLEIN UNDERGROUND LLC 53426 09/07/2021 20211008 8,704.75 CHECK 465374 TOTAL: 8,704.75 465375 10/08/2021 PRTD 133014 SOCCER SHOTS 09-08-2021 09/08/2021 20211008 9,922.00 SOCCER SHOTS 09-08-2021 #2 09/08/2021 20211008 8,923.00 SOCCER SHOTS 09-08-2021 #3 09/08/2021 20211008 9,922.00 SOCCER SHOTS 09-08-2021 #4 09/08/2021 20211008 9,559.00 SOCCER SHOTS 09-08-2021 #5 09/08/2021 20211008 1,005.00 CHECK 465375 TOTAL: 39,331.00 465376 10/08/2021 PRTD 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9308784013 09/07/2021 20211008 1,256.47 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9308787915 09/08/2021 20211008 27.32 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9308801807 09/12/2021 20211008 2,858.63 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9308801806 09/12/2021 20211008 47.93 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9308801808 09/12/2021 20211008 113.68 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9308805868 09/13/2021 20211008 865.39 CHECK 465376 TOTAL: 5,169.42 465377 10/08/2021 PRTD 134957 LEACH LAW OFFICE LLC AUG-2021 08/31/2021 20211008 21,635.40 CHECK 465377 TOTAL: 21,635.40 465378 10/08/2021 PRTD 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 347900 09/01/2021 20211008 32,476.00 CHECK 465378 TOTAL: 32,476.00 465379 10/08/2021 PRTD 135867 LIBATION PROJECT 39071 09/21/2021 20211008 283.00 LIBATION PROJECT 39072 09/21/2021 20211008 534.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 19 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET LIBATION PROJECT 39070 09/21/2021 20211008 436.50 CHECK 465379 TOTAL: 1,253.50 465380 10/08/2021 PRTD 101146 LINGO - FORMERLY IMPACT 608802784 09/16/2021 20211008 98.43 CHECK 465380 TOTAL: 98.43 465381 10/08/2021 PRTD 146427 LUCID BREWING LLC 11928 09/22/2021 20211008 100.00 LUCID BREWING LLC 11908 09/22/2021 20211008 50.00 LUCID BREWING LLC 11927 09/22/2021 20211008 142.00 CHECK 465381 TOTAL: 292.00 465382 10/08/2021 PRTD 141916 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 40244 09/21/2021 20211008 195.00 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 40250 09/21/2021 20211008 195.00 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 40249 09/21/2021 20211008 110.70 CHECK 465382 TOTAL: 500.70 465383 10/08/2021 PRTD 160190 MAGNACHARGE BATTERY (USA) INC M11343 09/08/2021 20211008 1,035.96 CHECK 465383 TOTAL: 1,035.96 465384 10/08/2021 PRTD 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 22587207 09/07/2021 20211008 12,245.54 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 22587208 09/07/2021 20211008 1,254.85 CHECK 465384 TOTAL: 13,500.39 465385 10/08/2021 PRTD 122554 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC 0024200307 09/13/2021 20211008 1,508.95 CHECK 465385 TOTAL: 1,508.95 465386 10/08/2021 PRTD 141215 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV645375 09/21/2021 20211008 520.50 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV646440 09/21/2021 20211008 364.44 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV646441 09/21/2021 20211008 428.46 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV646438 09/21/2021 20211008 359.04 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 20 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET MAVERICK WINE LLC INV646437 09/21/2021 20211008 105.48 CHECK 465386 TOTAL: 1,777.92 465387 10/08/2021 PRTD 130477 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 599256 09/22/2021 20211008 1,498.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 599255 09/22/2021 20211008 104.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 599249 09/22/2021 20211008 1,137.30 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 599251 09/22/2021 20211008 84.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 599252 09/22/2021 20211008 2,557.80 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 599253 09/22/2021 20211008 42.00 CHECK 465387 TOTAL: 5,423.10 465388 10/08/2021 PRTD 101483 MENARDS INC 45710 09/09/2021 20211008 369.10 MENARDS INC 46679 09/13/2021 20211008 41.65 MENARDS INC 46463 09/09/2021 20211008 43.25 MENARDS INC 46477 09/09/2021 20211008 24.98 MENARDS INC 46467 09/09/2021 20211008 28.77 MENARDS INC 46542 09/10/2021 20211008 142.24 MENARDS INC 45813 08/27/2021 20211008 21.72 MENARDS INC 45713 08/26/2021 20211008 25.73 CHECK 465388 TOTAL: 697.44 465389 10/08/2021 PRTD 138732 TRADITION WINE & SPIRITS LLC 28239 09/21/2021 20211008 1,224.00 CHECK 465389 TOTAL: 1,224.00 465390 10/08/2021 PRTD 104650 MICRO CENTER 8861535 09/07/2021 20211008 200.86 CHECK 465390 TOTAL: 200.86 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 21 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465391 10/08/2021 PRTD 127639 MIDWAY FORD COMPANY 129874 07/20/2021 22100010 20211008 38,270.92 CHECK 465391 TOTAL: 38,270.92 465392 10/08/2021 PRTD 100890 HILLTOP ENTERPRISES INC 100384 09/07/2021 20211008 5,700.00 HILLTOP ENTERPRISES INC 100385 09/07/2021 20211008 5,975.00 CHECK 465392 TOTAL: 11,675.00 465393 10/08/2021 PRTD 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY INC 44090 09/10/2021 20211008 1,347.95 CHECK 465393 TOTAL: 1,347.95 465394 10/08/2021 PRTD 160177 MIDWEST MECHANICAL SUPPLY INC P19947-1 09/13/2021 20211008 998.84 CHECK 465394 TOTAL: 998.84 465395 10/08/2021 PRTD 145395 MILK AND HONEY LLC 9202 09/23/2021 20211008 198.00 CHECK 465395 TOTAL: 198.00 465396 10/08/2021 PRTD 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WA 36254 09/08/2021 20211008 5,000.00 CHECK 465396 TOTAL: 5,000.00 465397 10/08/2021 PRTD 127062 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENANCE IN 180188004 09/05/2021 20211008 24.73 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENANCE IN 180188003 09/05/2021 20211008 12.90 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENANCE IN 180188005 09/05/2021 20211008 36.56 CHECK 465397 TOTAL: 74.19 465398 10/08/2021 PRTD 136248 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT INC P56663 09/11/2021 20211008 18.55 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT INC P56664 09/11/2021 20211008 257.94 CHECK 465398 TOTAL: 276.49 465399 10/08/2021 PRTD 128914 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 31728 09/10/2021 20211008 59.00 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 31729 09/10/2021 20211008 562.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 22 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET BJKK DEVELOPMENT 31713 09/09/2021 20211008 141.00 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 31714 09/09/2021 20211008 32.00 CHECK 465399 TOTAL: 794.00 465400 10/08/2021 PRTD 138171 MOBOTREX INC 25320 09/08/2021 20211008 2,322.00 CHECK 465400 TOTAL: 2,322.00 465401 10/08/2021 PRTD 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC E-25349 09/21/2021 20211008 500.75 MODIST BREWING LLC E-25350 09/21/2021 20211008 332.00 MODIST BREWING LLC E-25348 09/21/2021 20211008 332.00 CHECK 465401 TOTAL: 1,164.75 465402 10/08/2021 PRTD 122019 MOORE CREATIVE TALENT INC 147209 06/29/2021 20211008 840.00 MOORE CREATIVE TALENT INC 147210 09/26/2021 20211008 1,320.00 CHECK 465402 TOTAL: 2,160.00 465403 10/08/2021 PRTD 100912 MOTOROLA INC 16160577 09/08/2021 20211008 18,441.13 CHECK 465403 TOTAL: 18,441.13 465404 10/08/2021 PRTD 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1322511-00 09/09/2021 20211008 453.84 CHECK 465404 TOTAL: 453.84 465405 10/08/2021 PRTD 142251 MUNICI-PALS 2021 Workshop 09/07/2021 20211008 240.00 CHECK 465405 TOTAL: 240.00 465406 10/08/2021 PRTD 160072 NORTHERN AIR CORPORATION 188447 09/08/2021 20211008 82.75 CHECK 465406 TOTAL: 82.75 465407 10/08/2021 PRTD 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 178532 09/22/2021 20211008 252.00 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 178530 09/22/2021 20211008 1,968.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 23 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET NEW FRANCE WINE CO 178539 09/22/2021 20211008 1,382.00 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 178531 09/22/2021 20211008 684.00 CHECK 465407 TOTAL: 4,286.00 465408 10/08/2021 PRTD 104350 NIKE USA INC 9608985399 09/09/2021 20211008 162.15 CHECK 465408 TOTAL: 162.15 465409 10/08/2021 PRTD 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 52827 09/07/2021 20211008 115.35 CHECK 465409 TOTAL: 115.35 465410 10/08/2021 PRTD 999995 Ridge Construction LLC ED173128-REFUND 10/01/2021 20211008 10,000.00 CHECK 465410 TOTAL: 10,000.00 465411 10/08/2021 PRTD 999994 Action Roofing Siding ED191378-REFUND 10/01/2021 20211008 40.85 CHECK 465411 TOTAL: 40.85 465412 10/08/2021 PRTD 999994 Capital Construction ED192393-REFUND 09/30/2021 20211008 560.50 CHECK 465412 TOTAL: 560.50 465413 10/08/2021 PRTD 999996 Chicks with Sticks 645961 - REFUND 09/30/2021 20211008 49.80 CHECK 465413 TOTAL: 49.80 465414 10/08/2021 PRTD 999996 Jesse Dodge 1168144 - REFUND 10/01/2021 20211008 72.00 CHECK 465414 TOTAL: 72.00 465415 10/08/2021 PRTD 999993 Julie Norgen 25612 09/30/2021 20211008 342.41 CHECK 465415 TOTAL: 342.41 465416 10/08/2021 PRTD 999993 Julie Norgren 25844 10/04/2021 20211008 432.05 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 24 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465416 TOTAL: 432.05 465417 10/08/2021 PRTD 999997 Richard Haddad 25845 10/04/2021 20211008 4,000.13 CHECK 465417 TOTAL: 4,000.13 465418 10/08/2021 PRTD 104950 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES LLC 21100347192 09/08/2021 20211008 357.00 CHECK 465418 TOTAL: 357.00 465419 10/08/2021 PRTD 141248 PAPER ROLL PRODUCTS LLC 170080 09/08/2021 20211008 964.95 CHECK 465419 TOTAL: 964.95 465420 10/08/2021 PRTD 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 48455555 09/18/2021 20211008 390.70 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 50692959 09/17/2021 20211008 590.40 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY LF210217640556 10/03/2021 20211008 4.26 CHECK 465420 TOTAL: 985.36 465421 10/08/2021 PRTD 149249 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-118307 09/23/2021 20211008 825.50 CHECK 465421 TOTAL: 825.50 465422 10/08/2021 PRTD 160131 PER MAR SECURITY AND RESEARCH COR 2597739 09/08/2021 20211008 222.00 PER MAR SECURITY AND RESEARCH COR 2597740 09/08/2021 20211008 205.29 PER MAR SECURITY AND RESEARCH COR 2597741 09/08/2021 20211008 222.00 PER MAR SECURITY AND RESEARCH COR 2597738 09/08/2021 20211008 253.44 PER MAR SECURITY AND RESEARCH COR 2597737 09/08/2021 20211008 157.50 CHECK 465422 TOTAL: 1,060.23 465423 10/08/2021 PRTD 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 210549918 09/10/2021 20211008 1,116.00 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 210549617 09/10/2021 20211008 226.60 CHECK 465423 TOTAL: 1,342.60 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 25 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465424 10/08/2021 PRTD 105690 PRO-TEC DESIGN INC 95604 02/26/2020 20211008 1,824.93 CHECK 465424 TOTAL: 1,824.93 465425 10/08/2021 PRTD 143618 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-27530 09/22/2021 20211008 624.00 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-27528 09/22/2021 20211008 585.00 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-27529 09/22/2021 20211008 585.00 CHECK 465425 TOTAL: 1,794.00 465426 10/08/2021 PRTD 143753 PUGLEASA IN00120848 09/02/2021 20211008 2,789.00 CHECK 465426 TOTAL: 2,789.00 465427 10/08/2021 PRTD 112097 PUMP & METER SERVICE 34381-1 09/08/2021 20211008 87.00 CHECK 465427 TOTAL: 87.00 465428 10/08/2021 PRTD 135833 QUALITY FORKLIFT SALES AND SERVIC P00277 09/13/2021 20211008 811.99 CHECK 465428 TOTAL: 811.99 465429 10/08/2021 PRTD 160142 QUINLIVAN & HUGHES, PA 151373 09/08/2021 20211008 1,994.20 CHECK 465429 TOTAL: 1,994.20 465430 10/08/2021 PRTD 104643 RECREATION SUPPLY COMPANY INC 439624 09/10/2021 20211008 181.56 CHECK 465430 TOTAL: 181.56 465431 10/08/2021 PRTD 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 82924 09/08/2021 20211008 1,192.00 CHECK 465431 TOTAL: 1,192.00 465432 10/08/2021 PRTD 100980 ROBERT B HILL COMPANY 393992 09/13/2021 20211008 217.19 CHECK 465432 TOTAL: 217.19 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 26 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465433 10/08/2021 PRTD 101659 ORKIN 215700380 09/07/2021 20211008 142.36 CHECK 465433 TOTAL: 142.36 465434 10/08/2021 PRTD 140989 S M HENTGES & SONS INC 02-R 09/01/2021 20211008 153,986.86 CHECK 465434 TOTAL: 153,986.86 465435 10/08/2021 PRTD 151777 SCHREIBER MULLANEY CONSTRUCTION C 1852-21-05 07/15/2021 20211008 11,569.74 CHECK 465435 TOTAL: 11,569.74 465436 10/08/2021 PRTD 132210 RUSCIANO GROUP 67126 09/07/2021 20211008 755.00 RUSCIANO GROUP 67137 09/10/2021 20211008 755.00 CHECK 465436 TOTAL: 1,510.00 465437 10/08/2021 PRTD 100995 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 411332 09/13/2021 20211008 10,047.09 CHECK 465437 TOTAL: 10,047.09 465438 10/08/2021 PRTD 100995 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 411330 09/13/2021 20211008 30,209.32 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 411334 09/13/2021 20211008 3,949.10 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 411213 09/13/2021 22100003 20211008 919.19 CHECK 465438 TOTAL: 35,077.61 465439 10/08/2021 PRTD 111824 SIDEKICK INC 1071 09/09/2021 20211008 4,852.30 CHECK 465439 TOTAL: 4,852.30 465440 10/08/2021 PRTD 120784 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 16487 09/07/2021 20211008 100.00 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 16464 09/10/2021 20211008 981.72 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 16514 09/10/2021 20211008 185.00 CHECK 465440 TOTAL: 1,266.72 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 27 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465441 10/08/2021 PRTD 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 112735383-001 09/08/2021 20211008 47.44 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 112731125-001 09/08/2021 20211008 11.73 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 112793750-001 09/10/2021 20211008 129.51 CHECK 465441 TOTAL: 188.68 465442 10/08/2021 PRTD 127878 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 9276407 07/23/2021 20211008 -144.00 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2127422 09/22/2021 20211008 2,170.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 9276406 07/23/2021 20211008 -140.00 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2127423 09/22/2021 20211008 227.20 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2127424 09/22/2021 20211008 1,091.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2127421 09/22/2021 20211008 193.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2127412 09/22/2021 20211008 96.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2127413 09/22/2021 20211008 198.53 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2127414 09/22/2021 20211008 197.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2127419 09/22/2021 20211008 250.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2127416 09/22/2021 20211008 193.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2127420 09/22/2021 20211008 1,067.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2127417 09/22/2021 20211008 524.00 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2127418 09/22/2021 20211008 198.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 9276405 07/23/2021 20211008 -110.00 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 9301185 09/23/2021 20211008 -112.00 CHECK 465442 TOTAL: 5,904.93 465443 10/08/2021 PRTD 134700 SPOK INC E0319246U 09/07/2021 20211008 130.41 CHECK 465443 TOTAL: 130.41 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 28 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465444 10/08/2021 PRTD 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 42313 09/22/2021 20211008 291.00 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 42315 09/22/2021 20211008 165.00 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 42314 09/22/2021 20211008 159.00 CHECK 465444 TOTAL: 615.00 465445 10/08/2021 PRTD 100136 STERLING CUT GLASS 0517126-IN 09/07/2021 20211008 1,068.52 CHECK 465445 TOTAL: 1,068.52 465446 10/08/2021 PRTD 101015 STREICHERS INC I1523670 09/10/2021 20211008 10.99 CHECK 465446 TOTAL: 10.99 465447 10/08/2021 PRTD 143566 WOODS, MINDY A 0000072 09/02/2021 20211008 260.00 WOODS, MINDY A 0000071 09/02/2021 20211008 65.00 CHECK 465447 TOTAL: 325.00 465448 10/08/2021 PRTD 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC 10181145 09/10/2021 20211008 216.00 CHECK 465448 TOTAL: 216.00 465449 10/08/2021 PRTD 104932 TAYLOR MADE 35335988 09/14/2021 20211008 384.55 TAYLOR MADE 35344596 09/21/2021 20211008 1,049.24 CHECK 465449 TOTAL: 1,433.79 465450 10/08/2021 PRTD 145168 TAYLOR SALES LLC 862021 08/06/2021 20211008 400.00 CHECK 465450 TOTAL: 400.00 465451 10/08/2021 PRTD 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL IN M26717 09/13/2021 20211008 669.00 CHECK 465451 TOTAL: 669.00 465452 10/08/2021 PRTD 148022 TOTAL COATING SOLUTIONS 1044 09/07/2021 22100036 20211008 26,800.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 29 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465452 TOTAL: 26,800.00 465453 10/08/2021 PRTD 138581 TRUST IN US LLC 91521 09/10/2021 20211008 20.00 TRUST IN US LLC 91512 09/09/2021 20211008 230.00 CHECK 465453 TOTAL: 250.00 465454 10/08/2021 PRTD 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO 50534 09/07/2021 20211008 150.00 CHECK 465454 TOTAL: 150.00 465455 10/08/2021 PRTD 103973 ULINE INC 138042621 09/07/2021 20211008 136.49 ULINE INC 138472901 09/09/2021 20211008 62.72 CHECK 465455 TOTAL: 199.21 465456 10/08/2021 PRTD 140009 US KIDS GOLF LLC IN2028042 09/09/2021 20211008 3,452.19 CHECK 465456 TOTAL: 3,452.19 465457 10/08/2021 PRTD 103500 VALLEY PAVING INC ENG 21-2 #6 09/10/2021 20211008 776,263.59 CHECK 465457 TOTAL: 776,263.59 465458 10/08/2021 PRTD 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES LLC 21398535-30973946 09/08/2021 20211008 50.00 CHECK 465458 TOTAL: 50.00 465459 10/08/2021 PRTD 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S005056607.001 09/08/2021 20211008 62.10 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S005059773.001 09/08/2021 20211008 86.70 CHECK 465459 TOTAL: 148.80 465460 10/08/2021 PRTD 119454 VINOCOPIA INC 0287341-IN 09/23/2021 20211008 221.67 VINOCOPIA INC 0287343-IN 09/23/2021 20211008 153.25 VINOCOPIA INC 0287342-IN 09/23/2021 20211008 169.00 VINOCOPIA INC 0287340-IN 09/23/2021 20211008 66.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 30 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET VINOCOPIA INC 0287344-IN 09/23/2021 20211008 803.75 CHECK 465460 TOTAL: 1,414.17 465461 10/08/2021 PRTD 100183 WASHINGTON COUNTY 193750 09/15/2021 20211008 1,596.67 CHECK 465461 TOTAL: 1,596.67 465462 10/08/2021 PRTD 135181 WATERFORD OIL CO INC 134621 09/08/2021 20211008 382.35 CHECK 465462 TOTAL: 382.35 465463 10/08/2021 PRTD 146118 WINDLAND, KATHRINE KRISTI 417 09/07/2021 20211008 643.20 CHECK 465463 TOTAL: 643.20 465464 10/08/2021 PRTD 101033 WINE COMPANY 183980 09/22/2021 20211008 2,431.10 WINE COMPANY 183978 09/22/2021 20211008 2,946.33 WINE COMPANY 183979 09/22/2021 20211008 2,068.05 CHECK 465464 TOTAL: 7,445.48 465465 10/08/2021 PRTD 124503 WINSUPPLY EDEN PRAIRIE MN CO 216305 01 09/09/2021 20211008 11.84 CHECK 465465 TOTAL: 11.84 465466 10/08/2021 PRTD 118395 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC X2152391.001 09/11/2021 20211008 52.60 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC X2152391 09/13/2021 20211008 578.60 CHECK 465466 TOTAL: 631.20 465467 10/08/2021 PRTD 142162 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 2974 09/17/2021 20211008 153.00 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 2973 09/17/2021 20211008 316.50 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 2975 09/17/2021 20211008 269.10 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 2984 09/22/2021 20211008 262.80 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 2983 09/22/2021 20211008 472.20 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/07/2021 13:39User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 31 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465467 TOTAL: 1,473.60 465468 10/08/2021 PRTD 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES R-018471-000-2 09/07/2021 20211008 14,141.75 WSB & ASSOCIATES R-017897-000-4 09/07/2021 20211008 36,745.25 WSB & ASSOCIATES R-017423-000-8 09/07/2021 20211008 1,508.00 CHECK 465468 TOTAL: 52,395.00 465469 10/08/2021 PRTD 160077 YETI HOLDINGS, INC 991645050 09/13/2021 20211008 194.99 CHECK 465469 TOTAL: 194.99 465470 10/08/2021 PRTD 130618 CHANHASSEN AUTO CENTERS LLC 21971 09/01/2021 20211008 8,031.41 CHECK 465470 TOTAL: 8,031.41 NUMBER OF CHECKS 193 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** 3,262,296.28 COUNT AMOUNT TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS 193 3,262,296.28 *** GRAND TOTAL *** 3,262,296.28 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 54 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND SUB FUND DUE TO DUE FR 1000 General 299,391.842300 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety 15,909.132400 Arts and Culture 600.002600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 4,324.962600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 626,807.922600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 5,858.532600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 542.504000 Capital Projects 60,295.944200 Equipment Replacement 5,370.004400 PIR Capital Projects 283,548.765100 Art Center 116.825200 Braemar Golf Course 35,607.875400 Edinborough Park 10,884.105500 Braemar Arena 67,890.115600 Braemar Field 1,507.385700 Centennial Lakes 4,857.475800 Liquor 260,487.185900 Utility Fund 82,456.415900 Utility Fund 60,563.785900 Utility Fund 185,629.885900 Utility Fund 90,381.796000 Risk Management 995.336100 Equipment Operations 8,956.796200 Information Technology 2,211.876300 Facilities Management 260.017100 PS Training Facility 14,855.687200 MN Task Force 1 8,533.979000 Payroll 17,732.039999 Pooled Cash Fund 2,156,578.05 TOTAL 2,156,578.05 2,156,578.05 ** END OF REPORT - Generated by Lonnia Jefferson ** City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 1 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 4 10/04/2021 WIRE 124942 WEST HENNEPIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING 5928EWING 10/04/2021 20211004 259,300.00 CHECK 4 TOTAL: 259,300.00 643 10/07/2021 WIRE 124942 WEST HENNEPIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING 6432JOSEPHINE 09/08/2021 365,700.00 CHECK 643 TOTAL: 365,700.00 465471 10/15/2021 PRTD 105476 ACE TRAILER SALES 447811 09/13/2021 20211015 180.90 CHECK 465471 TOTAL: 180.90 465472 10/15/2021 PRTD 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 911690003 08/20/2021 20211015 56.64 ACUSHNET COMPANY 911692420 08/21/2021 20211015 124.90 CHECK 465472 TOTAL: 181.54 465473 10/15/2021 PRTD 140318 ADVANCED ELEMENTS, INC 76388 09/14/2021 20211015 20,280.57 ADVANCED ELEMENTS, INC 76387 09/14/2021 20211015 633.95 ADVANCED ELEMENTS, INC 76565 09/14/2021 20211015 9,003.25 CHECK 465473 TOTAL: 29,917.77 465474 10/15/2021 PRTD 160095 AM CRAFT SPIRITS SALES & MARKETIN 13098 09/29/2021 20211015 67.09 AM CRAFT SPIRITS SALES & MARKETIN 13097 09/29/2021 20211015 112.09 CHECK 465474 TOTAL: 179.18 465475 10/15/2021 PRTD 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1HX1-NCJL-1DM9 09/07/2021 20211015 504.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1V3T-V3WR-3YCJ 09/14/2021 20211015 112.68 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1FMT-R17C-4HMR 09/14/2021 20211015 79.26 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1DRR-GN39-4XC7 09/14/2021 20211015 18.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1LR1-JDGY-KKGQ 09/14/2021 20211015 177.08 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1FMT-R17C-F4XX 09/14/2021 20211015 67.91 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1MTN-P7HM-H3XJ 09/14/2021 20211015 103.98 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 2 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1NXW-91D4-H4VX 09/14/2021 20211015 385.29 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1FJ4-NHTW-HD64 09/14/2021 20211015 107.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1NMG-4Q6K-DK9P 09/15/2021 20211015 22.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1NMG-4Q6K-DNH6 09/15/2021 20211015 37.56 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1M6N-QYG7-6GGV 09/16/2021 20211015 133.32 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1LHL-9V7R-994Y 09/16/2021 20211015 30.10 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1YWH-Q7RH-C6HT 09/16/2021 20211015 129.98 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1M6N-QYG7-C74G 09/16/2021 20211015 210.41 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1Y96-63V1-KJGC 09/16/2021 20211015 291.86 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1NMG-4Q6K-YQRY 09/17/2021 20211015 39.66 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1YWH-Q7RH-W176 09/17/2021 20211015 53.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 16DK-4RX4-LX3T 09/19/2021 20211015 237.39 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1G3P-QGVY-PJ4G 09/19/2021 20211015 270.42 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1VFY-CC7W-WX6N 09/19/2021 20211015 11.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 16TR-7CTN-HVNQ 09/20/2021 20211015 90.47 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 11FQ-LT69-DYF3 09/20/2021 20211015 101.07 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1N4D-RHTT-LCK6 09/26/2021 20211015 42.35 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 177L-N6Q3-LJP4 09/26/2021 20211015 11.80 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 13G1-MMW9-HQ4Q 09/02/2021 20211015 764.17 CHECK 465475 TOTAL: 4,034.73 465476 10/15/2021 PRTD 151441 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 1005144510 09/15/2021 20211015 469.81 CHECK 465476 TOTAL: 469.81 465477 10/15/2021 PRTD 151756 ARBEITER BREWING COMPANY LLC 446 09/30/2021 20211015 96.00 CHECK 465477 TOTAL: 96.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 3 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465478 10/15/2021 PRTD 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA S1405453-100121 10/01/2021 20211015 2,337.42 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA S1422086-100121 10/01/2021 20211015 5,856.96 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA S1406543-100121 10/01/2021 20211015 6,522.66 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA S1146354-100121 10/01/2021 20211015 264.05 CHECK 465478 TOTAL: 14,981.09 465479 10/15/2021 PRTD 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23270354.00-274 09/14/2021 20211015 13,545.00 CHECK 465479 TOTAL: 13,545.00 465480 10/15/2021 PRTD 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0091286700 09/16/2021 20211015 7,714.03 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0091516700 09/30/2021 20211015 3,756.45 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0091516300 09/30/2021 20211015 89.55 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0091517200 09/30/2021 20211015 1,062.75 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0091515900 09/30/2021 20211015 209.55 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0091516100 09/30/2021 20211015 209.55 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0104011200 09/30/2021 20211015 59.32 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0091516200 09/30/2021 20211015 89.55 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0091547600 09/30/2021 20211015 3,749.55 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0091516000 09/30/2021 20211015 209.55 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0104011100 09/30/2021 20211015 227.34 CHECK 465480 TOTAL: 17,377.19 465481 10/15/2021 PRTD 160009 APH STORES, INC 406002724 09/16/2021 20211015 201.00 CHECK 465481 TOTAL: 201.00 465482 10/15/2021 PRTD 143097 BERRY DUNN MCNEIL & PARKER LLC 407172 09/20/2021 20211015 340.00 CHECK 465482 TOTAL: 340.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 4 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465483 10/15/2021 PRTD 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 14557 09/30/2021 20211015 387.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 14556 09/30/2021 20211015 261.00 CHECK 465483 TOTAL: 648.00 465484 10/15/2021 PRTD 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 162640 12/16/2020 20211015 48.01 CHECK 465484 TOTAL: 48.01 465485 10/15/2021 PRTD 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84207219 09/14/2021 20211015 1,338.40 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84214701 09/20/2021 20211015 2,627.51 CHECK 465485 TOTAL: 3,965.91 465486 10/15/2021 PRTD 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 181145 09/28/2021 20211015 938.75 BOURGET IMPORTS 181146 09/28/2021 20211015 1,930.25 BOURGET IMPORTS 181149 09/28/2021 20211015 377.25 CHECK 465486 TOTAL: 3,246.25 465487 10/15/2021 PRTD 117040 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC 008P3108 09/14/2021 20211015 477.86 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC 005P6899 09/15/2021 20211015 6.97 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC 008P3315 09/21/2021 20211015 -44.88 CHECK 465487 TOTAL: 439.95 465488 10/15/2021 PRTD 117040 ALLIANCE PARTS TRUCK AND TRAILER 007P15452 09/16/2021 20211015 613.71 CHECK 465488 TOTAL: 613.71 465489 10/15/2021 PRTD 142566 BRASS FOUNDRY BREWING CO E-7263 09/29/2021 20211015 128.00 CHECK 465489 TOTAL: 128.00 465490 10/15/2021 PRTD 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341210165 09/29/2021 20211015 5,874.15 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341210163 09/29/2021 20211015 38.05 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 5 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341210167 09/29/2021 20211015 169.25 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341210166 09/29/2021 20211015 77.15 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341210161 09/29/2021 20211015 2,325.88 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341210164 09/29/2021 20211015 4,099.79 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341210141 09/29/2021 20211015 119.30 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341210142 09/29/2021 20211015 2,217.50 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341210143 09/29/2021 20211015 1,873.47 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341210162 09/29/2021 20211015 178.95 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341210144 09/29/2021 20211015 2,488.98 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341210168 09/29/2021 20211015 1,674.93 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341210170 09/29/2021 20211015 2,831.00 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341210169 09/29/2021 20211015 1,308.27 CHECK 465490 TOTAL: 25,276.67 465491 10/15/2021 PRTD 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 340991449 09/07/2021 20211015 6,222.85 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 341080397 09/14/2021 20211015 5,052.10 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 341143283 09/21/2021 20211015 3,643.25 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 341143284 09/21/2021 20211015 259.50 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 341143296 09/21/2021 20211015 83.10 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 341143298 09/21/2021 20211015 1,634.00 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 341271499 09/28/2021 20211015 3,201.40 CHECK 465491 TOTAL: 20,096.20 465492 10/15/2021 PRTD 100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC 49960 09/15/2021 20211015 617.27 CHECK 465492 TOTAL: 617.27 465493 10/15/2021 PRTD 100648 BERTELSON BROTHERS INC IN-47305 09/14/2021 20211015 29.00 BERTELSON BROTHERS INC IN-47303 09/14/2021 20211015 25.90 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 6 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465493 TOTAL: 54.90 465494 10/15/2021 PRTD 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 933726001 08/25/2021 20211015 407.48 CALLAWAY GOLF 933191218 05/13/2021 20211015 262.33 CALLAWAY GOLF 933191251 05/13/2021 20211015 158.39 CALLAWAY GOLF 933426970 06/21/2021 20211015 225.48 CALLAWAY GOLF 933468239 06/26/2021 20211015 496.80 CHECK 465494 TOTAL: 1,550.48 465495 10/15/2021 PRTD 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2598290 09/21/2021 20211015 5,981.60 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2600396 09/24/2021 20211015 595.30 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2600395 09/24/2021 20211015 117.00 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2600402 09/24/2021 20211015 626.25 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2600401 09/24/2021 20211015 1,171.75 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2601285 09/28/2021 20211015 2,984.90 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2601283 09/28/2021 20211015 158.25 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2601284 09/28/2021 20211015 42.00 CHECK 465495 TOTAL: 11,677.05 465496 10/15/2021 PRTD 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY C2415665 09/15/2021 20211015 1,450.00 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY C2416548 09/16/2021 20211015 1,341.25 CHECK 465496 TOTAL: 2,791.25 465497 10/15/2021 PRTD 151968 CHRISTMAS DECOR OF THE TWIN CITIE 0 - 2021 09/13/2021 20211015 1,900.08 CHECK 465497 TOTAL: 1,900.08 465498 10/15/2021 PRTD 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 4096329853 09/20/2021 20211015 17.52 CINTAS CORPORATION 4096330332 09/20/2021 20211015 34.88 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 7 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CINTAS CORPORATION 4096330434 09/20/2021 20211015 74.64 CINTAS CORPORATION 4096330313 09/20/2021 20211015 11.78 CINTAS CORPORATION 4096330269 09/20/2021 20211015 33.05 CINTAS CORPORATION 4096330369 09/20/2021 20211015 27.65 CINTAS CORPORATION 4096329780 09/20/2021 20211015 88.69 CINTAS CORPORATION 4096852988 09/24/2021 20211015 81.48 CINTAS CORPORATION 4097007396 09/27/2021 20211015 10.69 CHECK 465498 TOTAL: 380.38 465499 10/15/2021 PRTD 139927 CITY OF ROCHESTER MN 26279 09/02/2021 20211015 8,432.90 CHECK 465499 TOTAL: 8,432.90 465500 10/15/2021 PRTD 120433 COMCAST HOLDINGS CORPORATION 0161120-9/21 09/26/2021 20211015 20.27 CHECK 465500 TOTAL: 20.27 465501 10/15/2021 PRTD 120433 COMCAST HOLDINGS CORPORATION 0177449-09/21 09/25/2021 20211015 137.82 CHECK 465501 TOTAL: 137.82 465502 10/15/2021 PRTD 105981 TILLER CORPORATION 210915 09/15/2021 20211015 34,990.81 CHECK 465502 TOTAL: 34,990.81 465503 10/15/2021 PRTD 105981 TILLER CORPORATION 210831 08/31/2021 20211015 51,885.88 TILLER CORPORATION 210815 08/15/2021 20211015 95,355.07 CHECK 465503 TOTAL: 147,240.95 465504 10/15/2021 PRTD 100012 CORE & MAIN P594630 09/15/2021 20211015 1,814.52 CHECK 465504 TOTAL: 1,814.52 465505 10/15/2021 PRTD 160189 COYLE, ANN 1007 09/17/2021 20211015 1,365.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 8 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465505 TOTAL: 1,365.00 465506 10/15/2021 PRTD 100699 CULLIGAN SOFTWATER SERVICE COMPAN 25657 09/15/2021 20211015 297.11 CHECK 465506 TOTAL: 297.11 465507 10/15/2021 PRTD 127913 CUTTER SALES 153127 09/16/2021 20211015 14.80 CHECK 465507 TOTAL: 14.80 465508 10/15/2021 PRTD 100718 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 75402/1 09/14/2021 20211015 14.80 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 76962/1 09/17/2021 20211015 261.69 CHECK 465508 TOTAL: 276.49 465509 10/15/2021 PRTD 151184 DETECTACHEM, INC. INV04843 09/03/2021 20211015 86.80 CHECK 465509 TOTAL: 86.80 465510 10/15/2021 PRTD 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3578164 05/04/2021 20211015 542.50 CHECK 465510 TOTAL: 542.50 465511 10/15/2021 PRTD 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 853896 09/16/2021 20211015 220.15 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 854254 09/19/2021 20211015 315.00 CHECK 465511 TOTAL: 535.15 465512 10/15/2021 PRTD 143018 ECO WORKS SUPPLY 6238 09/15/2021 20211015 2,349.90 CHECK 465512 TOTAL: 2,349.90 465513 10/15/2021 PRTD 101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021-1512-JUNE 07/13/2021 20211015 403.00 CHECK 465513 TOTAL: 403.00 465514 10/15/2021 PRTD 103594 EDINALARM INC 68747 09/03/2021 20211015 99.39 EDINALARM INC 66725 07/23/2021 20211015 37.41 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 9 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465514 TOTAL: 136.80 465515 10/15/2021 PRTD 160062 ELM CREEK BREWING COMPANY E-1381 09/24/2021 20211015 372.00 CHECK 465515 TOTAL: 372.00 465516 10/15/2021 PRTD 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES JP091621-41 09/16/2021 20211015 180.60 CHECK 465516 TOTAL: 180.60 465517 10/15/2021 PRTD 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 2283314 09/16/2021 20211015 119.46 CHECK 465517 TOTAL: 119.46 465518 10/15/2021 PRTD 124231 ERVASTI, DARRELL 15163 09/20/2021 20211015 1,514.54 ERVASTI, DARRELL 15164 09/20/2021 20211015 1,897.70 CHECK 465518 TOTAL: 3,412.24 465519 10/15/2021 PRTD 100146 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-428510 09/14/2021 20211015 267.60 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-428726 09/16/2021 20211015 24.84 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-428803 09/17/2021 20211015 178.75 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-7148084 09/17/2021 20211015 208.00 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-7148034 09/17/2021 20211015 42.44 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-7148032 09/17/2021 20211015 27.84 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-428727 09/16/2021 20211015 26.48 CHECK 465519 TOTAL: 775.95 465520 10/15/2021 PRTD 147181 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-4607 09/29/2021 20211015 180.00 CHECK 465520 TOTAL: 180.00 465521 10/15/2021 PRTD 103600 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0482477 09/14/2021 20211015 1,284.03 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0482473 09/14/2021 20211015 1,024.28 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 10 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465521 TOTAL: 2,308.31 465522 10/15/2021 PRTD 160061 FILTER BREWING COMPANY LLC 1661 09/30/2021 20211015 226.00 CHECK 465522 TOTAL: 226.00 465523 10/15/2021 PRTD 141837 DAIOHS USA INC 573181 09/16/2021 20211015 246.58 CHECK 465523 TOTAL: 246.58 465524 10/15/2021 PRTD 105066 FITTING REFLECTIONS LLC 3166 09/16/2021 20211015 375.00 CHECK 465524 TOTAL: 375.00 465525 10/15/2021 PRTD 130699 FLEETPRIDE INC 82103449 09/16/2021 20211015 887.28 CHECK 465525 TOTAL: 887.28 465526 10/15/2021 PRTD 101103 WW GRAINGER 9053119641 09/14/2021 20211015 11.10 WW GRAINGER 9054396792 09/15/2021 20211015 6.22 WW GRAINGER 9056097372 09/16/2021 20211015 86.88 WW GRAINGER 9055717558 09/16/2021 20211015 129.07 WW GRAINGER 9059800145 09/20/2021 20211015 6.17 WW GRAINGER 9059800137 09/20/2021 20211015 38.20 WW GRAINGER 9059622697 09/20/2021 20211015 179.88 WW GRAINGER 9059800152 09/20/2021 20211015 33.93 CHECK 465526 TOTAL: 491.45 465527 10/15/2021 PRTD 144412 WINEBOW MN00101270 09/28/2021 20211015 1,083.50 WINEBOW MN00101275 09/28/2021 20211015 885.75 WINEBOW MN00101274 09/28/2021 20211015 742.98 WINEBOW 20201286 10/02/2021 20211015 -2.27 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 11 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465527 TOTAL: 2,709.96 465528 10/15/2021 PRTD 160211 GROVE NURSERY INC 31958500 09/17/2021 20211015 2,495.80 CHECK 465528 TOTAL: 2,495.80 465529 10/15/2021 PRTD 104482 GUNNAR ELECTRIC INC 20940 09/16/2021 20211015 506.18 GUNNAR ELECTRIC INC 20941 09/16/2021 20211015 4,015.93 CHECK 465529 TOTAL: 4,522.11 465530 10/15/2021 PRTD 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC 3-130799 09/09/2021 20211015 97.90 CHECK 465530 TOTAL: 97.90 465531 10/15/2021 PRTD 151168 HAMMER SPORTS LLC 598 09/19/2021 20211015 118.00 CHECK 465531 TOTAL: 118.00 465532 10/15/2021 PRTD 103884 HANCO CORP 593238 09/16/2021 20211015 55.24 CHECK 465532 TOTAL: 55.24 465533 10/15/2021 PRTD 100797 HAWKINS INC 6022519 09/15/2021 20211015 4,850.01 CHECK 465533 TOTAL: 4,850.01 465534 10/15/2021 PRTD 100798 HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIPMENT COMPANY R0094101 09/20/2021 20211015 7,000.00 CHECK 465534 TOTAL: 7,000.00 465535 10/15/2021 PRTD 101503 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY TAX 30-117-21 22 0122 10/05/2021 20211015 1,807.92 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY TAX 2021 2nd Half 10/05/2021 20211015 68,951.04 CHECK 465535 TOTAL: 70,758.96 465536 10/15/2021 PRTD 118765 HENRY SCHEIN INC 98856001 09/16/2021 20211015 76.00 CHECK 465536 TOTAL: 76.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 12 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465537 10/15/2021 PRTD 143536 R & H PAINTING LLC 1188 09/16/2021 20211015 8,607.40 CHECK 465537 TOTAL: 8,607.40 465538 10/15/2021 PRTD 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC 446396 09/28/2021 20211015 552.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 446389 09/28/2021 20211015 2,877.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 446349 09/28/2021 20211015 741.00 CHECK 465538 TOTAL: 4,170.00 465539 10/15/2021 PRTD 120085 IDEAL SERVICE 11349 09/20/2021 20211015 960.19 CHECK 465539 TOTAL: 960.19 465540 10/15/2021 PRTD 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 105725 09/28/2021 20211015 489.00 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 105724 09/28/2021 20211015 465.20 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 105688 09/28/2021 20211015 524.40 CHECK 465540 TOTAL: 1,478.60 465541 10/15/2021 PRTD 150898 INVICTUS BREWING INC 3565 09/29/2021 20211015 89.00 INVICTUS BREWING INC 3564 09/29/2021 20211015 93.00 CHECK 465541 TOTAL: 182.00 465542 10/15/2021 PRTD 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC 191177 09/17/2021 20211015 250.00 CHECK 465542 TOTAL: 250.00 465543 10/15/2021 PRTD 160041 JINX TEA, LLC 1598 09/30/2021 20211015 64.40 JINX TEA, LLC 1596 09/29/2021 20211015 64.40 CHECK 465543 TOTAL: 128.80 465544 10/15/2021 PRTD 100741 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3224319 09/15/2021 20211015 5,098.30 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3236401 09/29/2021 20211015 25.45 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 13 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3224396 09/29/2021 20211015 2,191.10 CHECK 465544 TOTAL: 7,314.85 465545 10/15/2021 PRTD 100835 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3499196 09/30/2021 20211015 1,442.45 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3499195 09/30/2021 20211015 104.00 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3499194 09/30/2021 20211015 1,051.75 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3499197 09/30/2021 20211015 2,032.80 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3499198 09/30/2021 20211015 104.00 CHECK 465545 TOTAL: 4,735.00 465546 10/15/2021 PRTD 100835 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6272183 09/16/2021 20211015 5,091.16 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6275865 09/23/2021 20211015 7,087.37 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6279749 09/30/2021 20211015 907.90 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6279747 09/30/2021 20211015 1,471.47 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6279746 09/30/2021 20211015 112.99 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6279745 09/30/2021 20211015 1,426.61 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6279748 09/30/2021 20211015 1,833.96 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6279743 09/30/2021 20211015 1,676.22 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6279741 09/30/2021 20211015 690.26 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6279742 09/30/2021 20211015 122.38 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6279744 09/30/2021 20211015 1,294.28 CHECK 465546 TOTAL: 21,714.60 465547 10/15/2021 PRTD 100835 WINE MERCHANTS 7345775 09/09/2021 20211015 6,749.37 WINE MERCHANTS 7347873 09/23/2021 20211015 5,663.26 WINE MERCHANTS 7348082 09/24/2021 20211015 96.76 WINE MERCHANTS 7348867 09/30/2021 20211015 50.38 WINE MERCHANTS 7348871 09/30/2021 20211015 2,319.47 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 14 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET WINE MERCHANTS 7348870 09/30/2021 20211015 1,445.32 WINE MERCHANTS 7348869 09/30/2021 20211015 542.76 WINE MERCHANTS 7348868 09/30/2021 20211015 74.57 WINE MERCHANTS 7348866 09/30/2021 20211015 1,552.13 WINE MERCHANTS 7348862 09/30/2021 20211015 48.38 WINE MERCHANTS 7348863 09/30/2021 20211015 1,935.47 WINE MERCHANTS 7348865 09/30/2021 20211015 695.95 WINE MERCHANTS 7348864 09/30/2021 20211015 3,766.20 CHECK 465547 TOTAL: 24,940.02 465548 10/15/2021 PRTD 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1889861 09/16/2021 20211015 7,568.08 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1889845 09/16/2021 20211015 5,170.51 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1889846 09/16/2021 20211015 6,323.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899748 09/30/2021 20211015 1,186.72 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899739 09/30/2021 20211015 1,291.26 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899731 09/30/2021 20211015 1,224.99 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899744 09/30/2021 20211015 893.09 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899745 09/30/2021 20211015 1,159.47 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899746 09/30/2021 20211015 1,158.75 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899747 09/30/2021 20211015 1,065.95 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899729 09/30/2021 20211015 280.19 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899743 09/30/2021 20211015 2,521.90 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899749 09/30/2021 20211015 197.57 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899751 09/30/2021 20211015 29.19 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899750 09/30/2021 20211015 408.35 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899741 09/30/2021 20211015 1,548.03 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 15 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899740 09/30/2021 20211015 1,510.07 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899725 09/30/2021 20211015 506.58 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899726 09/30/2021 20211015 320.04 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899727 09/30/2021 20211015 587.85 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899728 09/30/2021 20211015 194.38 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899730 09/30/2021 20211015 2,730.08 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899732 09/30/2021 20211015 1,017.36 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899733 09/30/2021 20211015 426.38 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899734 09/30/2021 20211015 1,331.89 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899736 09/30/2021 20211015 91.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899737 09/30/2021 20211015 67.86 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899735 09/30/2021 20211015 798.29 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899762 09/30/2021 20211015 222.44 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899760 09/30/2021 20211015 4,323.52 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899759 09/30/2021 20211015 2,483.31 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899758 09/30/2021 20211015 2,021.09 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899755 09/30/2021 20211015 1,060.22 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899757 09/30/2021 20211015 260.77 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899754 09/30/2021 20211015 1,078.43 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 166612 09/30/2021 20211015 -72.00 CHECK 465548 TOTAL: 52,987.41 465549 10/15/2021 PRTD 103409 KELBRO COMPANY 2679328 09/23/2021 20211015 41.00 KELBRO COMPANY 2679390 09/23/2021 20211015 142.40 KELBRO COMPANY 2681527 09/30/2021 20211015 118.08 KELBRO COMPANY 2681541 09/30/2021 20211015 49.12 KELBRO COMPANY 2681623 09/30/2021 20211015 161.58 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 16 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465549 TOTAL: 512.18 465550 10/15/2021 PRTD 113212 KENDELL INTERMEDIATE CORPORATION IN038166 09/14/2021 20211015 66.00 CHECK 465550 TOTAL: 66.00 465551 10/15/2021 PRTD 100944 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 140313 09/21/2021 20211015 89.25 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 140996 09/28/2021 20211015 1,938.02 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 140976 09/28/2021 20211015 266.25 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 140979 09/28/2021 20211015 2,442.27 CHECK 465551 TOTAL: 4,735.79 465552 10/15/2021 PRTD 151024 LA DONA SBC 5021 09/29/2021 20211015 148.00 CHECK 465552 TOTAL: 148.00 465553 10/15/2021 PRTD 100378 LAKE MANAGEMENT INC 40983 09/16/2021 20211015 5,922.70 CHECK 465553 TOTAL: 5,922.70 465554 10/15/2021 PRTD 151166 LAMIS, JAMES 12020601 10/06/2021 20211015 4,690.00 CHECK 465554 TOTAL: 4,690.00 465555 10/15/2021 PRTD 139451 LANDBRIDGE ECOLOGICAL INC 705 09/17/2021 20211015 800.00 CHECK 465555 TOTAL: 800.00 465556 10/15/2021 PRTD 136686 LARA SCHINKE-OLSON INCE 11736616 09/20/2021 20211015 208.00 CHECK 465556 TOTAL: 208.00 465557 10/15/2021 PRTD 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9308824385 09/17/2021 20211015 44.47 CHECK 465557 TOTAL: 44.47 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 17 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465558 10/15/2021 PRTD 135867 LIBATION PROJECT 39273 09/28/2021 20211015 563.50 LIBATION PROJECT 39274 09/28/2021 20211015 157.50 LIBATION PROJECT 39272 09/28/2021 20211015 129.50 CHECK 465558 TOTAL: 850.50 465559 10/15/2021 PRTD 130046 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH A SEPT 2021 09/17/2021 20211015 2,698.18 CHECK 465559 TOTAL: 2,698.18 465560 10/15/2021 PRTD 146427 LUCID BREWING LLC 11992 09/29/2021 20211015 146.00 LUCID BREWING LLC 11993 09/29/2021 20211015 192.00 CHECK 465560 TOTAL: 338.00 465561 10/15/2021 PRTD 100869 MARTIN-MCALLISTER CONSULTING PSYC 14111 08/31/2021 20211015 2,600.00 CHECK 465561 TOTAL: 2,600.00 465562 10/15/2021 PRTD 141215 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV649059 09/28/2021 20211015 453.48 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV649058 09/28/2021 20211015 261.48 CHECK 465562 TOTAL: 714.96 465563 10/15/2021 PRTD 101267 MBPTA Fall 2021 Seminar 10/04/2021 20211015 100.00 CHECK 465563 TOTAL: 100.00 465564 10/15/2021 PRTD 101254 MCCORMICK, CAROL 21EP107 10/05/2021 20211015 200.00 CHECK 465564 TOTAL: 200.00 465565 10/15/2021 PRTD 130477 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 600351 09/29/2021 20211015 336.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 600350 09/29/2021 20211015 214.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 600348 09/29/2021 20211015 1,024.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 600349 09/29/2021 20211015 410.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 18 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465565 TOTAL: 1,984.00 465566 10/15/2021 PRTD 142503 MCNAMARA CONTRACTING INC ENG 21-1 #2 09/10/2021 20211015 494,860.83 CHECK 465566 TOTAL: 494,860.83 465567 10/15/2021 PRTD 101483 MENARDS INC 46809 09/15/2021 20211015 16.68 MENARDS INC 46799 09/15/2021 20211015 58.83 MENARDS INC 46838/7138 09/16/2021 20211015 233.33 MENARDS INC 46917 09/17/2021 20211015 228.30 MENARDS INC 46721 09/14/2021 20211015 7.86 MENARDS INC 46733 09/14/2021 20211015 43.92 MENARDS INC 46188 09/03/2021 20211015 35.45 CHECK 465567 TOTAL: 624.37 465568 10/15/2021 PRTD 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD LLC 524889 09/15/2021 20211015 106.37 CHECK 465568 TOTAL: 106.37 465569 10/15/2021 PRTD 138732 TRADITION WINE & SPIRITS LLC 28373 09/28/2021 20211015 165.00 TRADITION WINE & SPIRITS LLC 28374 09/28/2021 20211015 165.00 CHECK 465569 TOTAL: 330.00 465570 10/15/2021 PRTD 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WA 36287 09/17/2021 20211015 2,200.00 CHECK 465570 TOTAL: 2,200.00 465571 10/15/2021 PRTD 136248 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT INC P56887 09/14/2021 20211015 279.50 CHECK 465571 TOTAL: 279.50 465572 10/15/2021 PRTD 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS COMPANY 85370 09/15/2021 20211015 971.25 CHECK 465572 TOTAL: 971.25 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 19 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465573 10/15/2021 PRTD 128914 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 31753 09/16/2021 20211015 143.00 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 31750 09/15/2021 20211015 22.00 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 31730 09/10/2021 20211015 28.50 CHECK 465573 TOTAL: 193.50 465574 10/15/2021 PRTD 100899 MN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY ALR0124270X 09/25/2021 20211015 100.00 CHECK 465574 TOTAL: 100.00 465575 10/15/2021 PRTD 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC E-25557 09/28/2021 20211015 347.25 MODIST BREWING LLC E-25556 09/28/2021 20211015 189.00 CHECK 465575 TOTAL: 536.25 465576 10/15/2021 PRTD 143339 MR CUTTING EDGE 3727 09/15/2021 20211015 145.00 CHECK 465576 TOTAL: 145.00 465577 10/15/2021 PRTD 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1314244-00 09/15/2021 20211015 451.96 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1324054-00 09/20/2021 20211015 105.13 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1225360-00 10/11/2021 20211015 -142.55 CHECK 465577 TOTAL: 414.54 465578 10/15/2021 PRTD 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 178756 09/29/2021 20211015 1,586.00 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 178755 09/29/2021 20211015 958.00 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 178754 09/29/2021 20211015 620.00 CHECK 465578 TOTAL: 3,164.00 465579 10/15/2021 PRTD 100922 NEWMAN SIGNS INC TRFINV033958 09/17/2021 20211015 2,729.17 NEWMAN SIGNS INC TRFINV033959 09/17/2021 20211015 12,326.10 CHECK 465579 TOTAL: 15,055.27 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 20 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465580 10/15/2021 PRTD 132620 NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRIC 2021-09-1RJA 09/14/2021 20211015 3,000.00 CHECK 465580 TOTAL: 3,000.00 465581 10/15/2021 PRTD 144575 LANCER CATERING AT BRAEMAR GOLF C EDN20210 10/13/2021 20211015 610.08 CHECK 465581 TOTAL: 610.08 465582 10/15/2021 PRTD 105901 OERTEL ARCHITECTS 20-14b.4 09/16/2021 20211015 406.25 OERTEL ARCHITECTS 20-37.3 09/16/2021 20211015 10,052.84 CHECK 465582 TOTAL: 10,459.09 465583 10/15/2021 PRTD 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 194062354001 09/14/2021 20211015 125.92 CHECK 465583 TOTAL: 125.92 465584 10/15/2021 PRTD 100936 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC 675929 09/14/2021 20211015 178.40 CHECK 465584 TOTAL: 178.40 465585 10/15/2021 PRTD 141965 OMNI BREWING COMPANY LLC E-10750 09/29/2021 20211015 207.00 CHECK 465585 TOTAL: 207.00 465586 10/15/2021 PRTD 999998 Betty Oakes 273-21-3296-REFUND 09/10/2021 20211015 79.76 CHECK 465586 TOTAL: 79.76 465587 10/15/2021 PRTD 999998 Estate of Donald W. Crouch 273-20-3704-REFUND 09/28/2021 20211015 98.59 CHECK 465587 TOTAL: 98.59 465588 10/15/2021 PRTD 999998 Estate of Howard Finnigan 273-21-2815-REFUND 09/10/2021 20211015 101.74 CHECK 465588 TOTAL: 101.74 465589 10/15/2021 PRTD 999998 Gary McClellan 273-21-3182-REFUND 09/10/2021 20211015 10.36 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 21 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465589 TOTAL: 10.36 465590 10/15/2021 PRTD 999998 Jack Ellis 273-21-2322-REFUND 09/28/2021 20211015 502.08 CHECK 465590 TOTAL: 502.08 465591 10/15/2021 PRTD 999998 Weyma Reavis 273-21-2515-REFUND 09/10/2021 20211015 87.09 CHECK 465591 TOTAL: 87.09 465592 10/15/2021 PRTD 999995 BETTIN INC ED191791-REFUND 10/12/2021 20211015 51.00 CHECK 465592 TOTAL: 51.00 465593 10/15/2021 PRTD 999995 CITY HOMES LLC ED172824 - REFUND 10/07/2021 20211015 8,770.00 CHECK 465593 TOTAL: 8,770.00 465594 10/15/2021 PRTD 999995 DAVID F GRAFT 190560 - REFUND 10/07/2021 20211015 33.10 CHECK 465594 TOTAL: 33.10 465595 10/15/2021 PRTD 999995 May Day Restoration ED189798 - REFUND 10/05/2021 20211015 395.73 CHECK 465595 TOTAL: 395.73 465596 10/15/2021 PRTD 999995 SCHERBER COMPANIES LLC ED186991-REFUND 10/13/2021 20211015 2,500.00 CHECK 465596 TOTAL: 2,500.00 465597 10/15/2021 PRTD 999995 STREETER CUSTOM BUILDER ED169463-REFUND 10/12/2021 20211015 9,225.00 CHECK 465597 TOTAL: 9,225.00 465598 10/15/2021 PRTD 999995 TJB HOMES IC ED178241 - REFUND 10/07/2021 20211015 10,000.00 CHECK 465598 TOTAL: 10,000.00 465599 10/15/2021 PRTD 999995 Wooddale Builders Inc ED172201-REFUND 10/08/2021 20211015 10,000.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 22 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465599 TOTAL: 10,000.00 465600 10/15/2021 PRTD 999996 Margaret Duffy 1198273-REFUND 10/08/2021 20211015 60.00 CHECK 465600 TOTAL: 60.00 465601 10/15/2021 PRTD 999996 Mary Kilgore 1197418-REFUND 10/08/2021 20211015 60.00 CHECK 465601 TOTAL: 60.00 465602 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 AADALEN,RICHARD 00082087-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 457.16 CHECK 465602 TOTAL: 457.16 465603 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 AGAH,JIRAN 00117398-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 25.98 CHECK 465603 TOTAL: 25.98 465604 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 ALEXANDER,LAURA 00125826-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 954.74 CHECK 465604 TOTAL: 954.74 465605 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 ANDERSON,LORI 00093411-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 54.02 CHECK 465605 TOTAL: 54.02 465606 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 ANDERSON,PAUL 00107348-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 2.26 CHECK 465606 TOTAL: 2.26 465607 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 BACH,BRYAN 00125596-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 227.67 CHECK 465607 TOTAL: 227.67 465608 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 BEARSON,KRISTOPHER 00119211-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 62.46 CHECK 465608 TOTAL: 62.46 465609 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 BENNETT,DAVIS 00122190-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 604.86 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 23 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465609 TOTAL: 604.86 465610 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 BERINGER,TOM 00102960-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 153.23 CHECK 465610 TOTAL: 153.23 465611 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 BERLING,PHIL 00086660-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 200.00 CHECK 465611 TOTAL: 200.00 465612 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 BOYLAN,JOHN 00080571-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 17.43 CHECK 465612 TOTAL: 17.43 465613 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 BUILDERS BY DESIGN 00127394-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 372.63 CHECK 465613 TOTAL: 372.63 465614 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 BURNS,CATHERINE 00123248-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 266.40 CHECK 465614 TOTAL: 266.40 465615 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 BUTORAC,MATT 00121023-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 419.86 CHECK 465615 TOTAL: 419.86 465616 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 BUTZ,ANDREA 00116069-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 203.13 CHECK 465616 TOTAL: 203.13 465617 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 CARR,ANN 00084402-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 41.50 CHECK 465617 TOTAL: 41.50 465618 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 CHORNENKY,DENNIS 00121277-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 56.81 CHECK 465618 TOTAL: 56.81 465619 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 CHRISTIANSON,KRISTEN 00127258-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 20.24 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 24 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465619 TOTAL: 20.24 465620 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 CLUCKEY,CHARLES 00115440-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 26.67 CHECK 465620 TOTAL: 26.67 465621 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 CONDON,NICHOLAS 00123468-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 8.37 CHECK 465621 TOTAL: 8.37 465622 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 CONDRA,ERIK 00123848-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 390.06 CHECK 465622 TOTAL: 390.06 465623 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 COOPER,CHRISTOPHER 00116692-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 109.95 CHECK 465623 TOTAL: 109.95 465624 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 CORNERSTONE COMMERCIAL CONSULTANT 00127063-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 47.03 CHECK 465624 TOTAL: 47.03 465625 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 DAUTH,DANIEL 00093068-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 100.00 CHECK 465625 TOTAL: 100.00 465626 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 DEDERICHS,DAVID 00115432-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 3.87 CHECK 465626 TOTAL: 3.87 465627 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 DELANEY,FLORA 00099862-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 40.21 CHECK 465627 TOTAL: 40.21 465628 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 DETROYER,MAURICE 00118178-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 119.68 CHECK 465628 TOTAL: 119.68 465629 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 DETROYER,MAURICE 00086600-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 110.32 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 25 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465629 TOTAL: 110.32 465630 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 DOVOLIS,DEAN 00085323-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 130.67 CHECK 465630 TOTAL: 130.67 465631 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 DUSSIK,CATHERINE 00125872-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 295.05 CHECK 465631 TOTAL: 295.05 465632 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 EICHORST,TYLER 00124853-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 24.97 CHECK 465632 TOTAL: 24.97 465633 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 ELLIOTT,BEN 00123077-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 103.93 CHECK 465633 TOTAL: 103.93 465634 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 EPI-3906, 00114861-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 471.55 CHECK 465634 TOTAL: 471.55 465635 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 ESTATE OF JUDY MARTIN 00088933-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 512.97 CHECK 465635 TOTAL: 512.97 465636 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 FLANNERY,J J 00105592-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 296.83 CHECK 465636 TOTAL: 296.83 465637 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 FROGGATT,KIRK 00119634-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 32.15 CHECK 465637 TOTAL: 32.15 465638 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 GALDENZI,MICHAEL 00122497-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 51.68 CHECK 465638 TOTAL: 51.68 465639 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 GARNER,HART 00117207-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 158.75 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 26 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465639 TOTAL: 158.75 465640 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 GIANOS,THEO 00083034-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 188.01 CHECK 465640 TOTAL: 188.01 465641 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 GLASS,CULLEN 00116942-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 58.70 CHECK 465641 TOTAL: 58.70 465642 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 GRAHAM,DAVID 00081623-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 509.98 CHECK 465642 TOTAL: 509.98 465643 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 GREAT NEIGHBORHOOD HOMES 00119046-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 40.60 CHECK 465643 TOTAL: 40.60 465644 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 HALVERSON,SARA 00112277-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 15.79 CHECK 465644 TOTAL: 15.79 465645 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 HANSON,SAM 00119744-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 10.43 CHECK 465645 TOTAL: 10.43 465646 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 HART,WILLIAM 00117211-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 26.51 CHECK 465646 TOTAL: 26.51 465647 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 HECKENLAIBLE,LEE 00107076-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 8.94 CHECK 465647 TOTAL: 8.94 465648 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 HERRGOTT,ELIZABETH 00120988-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 33.17 CHECK 465648 TOTAL: 33.17 465649 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 HIGDON,TAYLOR 00123650-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 267.06 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 27 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465649 TOTAL: 267.06 465650 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 HIGHMARK BUILDERS INC 00121698-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 178.60 CHECK 465650 TOTAL: 178.60 465651 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 HOPE,GERALD 00126737-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 62.66 CHECK 465651 TOTAL: 62.66 465652 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 HOTZ,KENNETH 00085350-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 261.39 CHECK 465652 TOTAL: 261.39 465653 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 HUEPENBECKER,JOHN 00100775-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 636.08 CHECK 465653 TOTAL: 636.08 465654 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 HUGHES,SCOTT 00116618-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 21.32 CHECK 465654 TOTAL: 21.32 465655 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 HYMAN,JAMES 00113571-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 28.47 CHECK 465655 TOTAL: 28.47 465656 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 JOHNSON,KATHLEEN 00115971-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 223.26 CHECK 465656 TOTAL: 223.26 465657 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 JOHNSON,MATTHEW 00124382-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 500.00 CHECK 465657 TOTAL: 500.00 465658 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 JOHNSTON,MELISSA 00111051-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 60.88 CHECK 465658 TOTAL: 60.88 465659 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 KALLAN,JOSH 00125936-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 39.56 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 28 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465659 TOTAL: 39.56 465660 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 KAMARA,MARCUS 00117668-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 171.08 CHECK 465660 TOTAL: 171.08 465661 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 KARLEN,TIM 00111005-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 65.39 CHECK 465661 TOTAL: 65.39 465662 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 KARLS,BENJAMIN 00122603-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 186.81 CHECK 465662 TOTAL: 186.81 465663 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 KBD INVESTMENTS LLC 00127451-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 180.00 CHECK 465663 TOTAL: 180.00 465664 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 KENNEDY,ROBERT 00081900-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 368.19 CHECK 465664 TOTAL: 368.19 465665 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 KG CARPENTRY LLC 00127214-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 200.00 CHECK 465665 TOTAL: 200.00 465666 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 KIM,SUNNY 00121451-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 250.00 CHECK 465666 TOTAL: 250.00 465667 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 KLEIN,HANNAH 00121729-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 200.00 CHECK 465667 TOTAL: 200.00 465668 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 KLEYNHANS,KELLY 00123001-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 33.29 CHECK 465668 TOTAL: 33.29 465669 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 KOUATLI,MARTHA 00103350-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 216.88 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 29 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465669 TOTAL: 216.88 465670 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 LAITALA,JEROME 00079114-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 84.29 CHECK 465670 TOTAL: 84.29 465671 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 LANGE,DANIEL 00112570-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 64.10 CHECK 465671 TOTAL: 64.10 465672 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 LEHNERT,RITA 00092789-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 223.17 CHECK 465672 TOTAL: 223.17 465673 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 LIAN-THORNTON,SPENCER 00125781-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 6.22 CHECK 465673 TOTAL: 6.22 465674 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 MCARDLE,KEVIN 00123717-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 595.35 CHECK 465674 TOTAL: 595.35 465675 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 MEEKER,WINIFRED 00087160-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 300.00 CHECK 465675 TOTAL: 300.00 465676 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 MESSNER,MICHAEL 00121452-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 350.00 CHECK 465676 TOTAL: 350.00 465677 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 MIELKE,JONATHAN 00122113-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 210.00 CHECK 465677 TOTAL: 210.00 465678 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 MILLER,AMBER 00123223-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 47.78 CHECK 465678 TOTAL: 47.78 465679 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 MOFFATT,DAN 00078226-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 90.70 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 30 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465679 TOTAL: 90.70 465680 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 MOLDENHAUER,DEBRA 00118004-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 70.55 CHECK 465680 TOTAL: 70.55 465681 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 MOTCH,EDWIN 00103149-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 61.03 CHECK 465681 TOTAL: 61.03 465682 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 NANCY E. WITOWSKI REVOCABLE TRUST 00079513-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 250.00 CHECK 465682 TOTAL: 250.00 465683 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 NASSER,RICARDO 00113664-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 348.66 CHECK 465683 TOTAL: 348.66 465684 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 NEWSTROM,RICHARD 00085917-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 5.24 CHECK 465684 TOTAL: 5.24 465685 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 NORMANDALE LUTHERAN CHURCH 00122220-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 118.24 CHECK 465685 TOTAL: 118.24 465686 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 OLIVER,SHEILA 00102723-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 366.54 CHECK 465686 TOTAL: 366.54 465687 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 ORUM,JESSICA 00106952-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 162.58 CHECK 465687 TOTAL: 162.58 465688 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 OSDEL,JUDY VAN 00088409-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 50.34 CHECK 465688 TOTAL: 50.34 465689 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 OSWALD,THOMAS 00112117-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 350.54 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 31 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465689 TOTAL: 350.54 465690 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 OTREMBA,TERRY 00122978-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 275.00 CHECK 465690 TOTAL: 275.00 465691 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 PATTERSON,BRETT 00127309-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 297.03 CHECK 465691 TOTAL: 297.03 465692 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 PEARSON,LLOYD 00086399-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 199.47 CHECK 465692 TOTAL: 199.47 465693 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 PETERSON,COLIN 00124107-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 22.61 CHECK 465693 TOTAL: 22.61 465694 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 PULSCHER,JOHN 00084752-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 292.05 CHECK 465694 TOTAL: 292.05 465695 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 QUARLES,JERROD 00103465-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 957.58 CHECK 465695 TOTAL: 957.58 465696 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 RADEMACHER,LANDA 00086891-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 200.00 CHECK 465696 TOTAL: 200.00 465697 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 RAEUCHLE,THOMAS 00105971-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 25.80 CHECK 465697 TOTAL: 25.80 465698 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 RECKE,RICHARD 00104906-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 100.00 CHECK 465698 TOTAL: 100.00 465699 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 RECKER,RICHARD 00109578-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 58.61 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 32 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465699 TOTAL: 58.61 465700 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 REMES,JOHN 00125171-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 229.39 CHECK 465700 TOTAL: 229.39 465701 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 RICKERT,PAIGE 00114234-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 380.27 CHECK 465701 TOTAL: 380.27 465702 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 RODGERS,JOHN 00085843-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 250.00 CHECK 465702 TOTAL: 250.00 465703 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 ROGERS,JONATHAN 00124973-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 15.84 CHECK 465703 TOTAL: 15.84 465704 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 SAHI,SIMRAN 00076146-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 43.37 CHECK 465704 TOTAL: 43.37 465705 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 SCHMIDT FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLC 00124566-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 795.09 CHECK 465705 TOTAL: 795.09 465706 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 SCHULER,ERIC 00123526-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 220.00 CHECK 465706 TOTAL: 220.00 465707 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 SHUTE,ANNE 00126694-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 5.29 CHECK 465707 TOTAL: 5.29 465708 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 SIEK,SUET 00124088-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 48.98 CHECK 465708 TOTAL: 48.98 465709 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 SISSI DAY,KRISTIN 00100942-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 139.34 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 33 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465709 TOTAL: 139.34 465710 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 SIT,ROBERT 00094748-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 32.28 CHECK 465710 TOTAL: 32.28 465711 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 SKOLD,DORIS 00083482-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 62.24 CHECK 465711 TOTAL: 62.24 465712 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 SKRAMSTAD,MICHAEL 00117027-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 450.00 CHECK 465712 TOTAL: 450.00 465713 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 SMITH,ROY 00079705-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 38.25 CHECK 465713 TOTAL: 38.25 465714 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 SMITH,SCOTT 00118657-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 58.24 CHECK 465714 TOTAL: 58.24 465715 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 SMITH,SUSAN 00098616-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 189.57 CHECK 465715 TOTAL: 189.57 465716 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 STAUNTON,KEVIN 00094751-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 13.82 CHECK 465716 TOTAL: 13.82 465717 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 SWOFFORD,JILL 00087848-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 751.61 CHECK 465717 TOTAL: 751.61 465718 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 TANGREN,ERIC 00118405-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 45.29 CHECK 465718 TOTAL: 45.29 465719 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 THAYSEN,JESPER 00125622-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 73.35 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 34 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465719 TOTAL: 73.35 465720 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 TROEN,BRIAN 00121707-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 17.29 CHECK 465720 TOTAL: 17.29 465721 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 VAN WYCK,EMILY 00124576-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 384.68 CHECK 465721 TOTAL: 384.68 465722 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 VEKER,STANLEY 00082742-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 68.65 CHECK 465722 TOTAL: 68.65 465723 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 VICTORSEN,JON R 00077737-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 200.00 CHECK 465723 TOTAL: 200.00 465724 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 VOLTIN,RON 00080464-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 450.00 CHECK 465724 TOTAL: 450.00 465725 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 VUCENICH,RODNEY 00120169-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 36.56 CHECK 465725 TOTAL: 36.56 465726 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 WARNER,TED 00124316-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 14.20 CHECK 465726 TOTAL: 14.20 465727 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 WEIGLE,CHRISTOPHER 00118516-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 42.78 CHECK 465727 TOTAL: 42.78 465728 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 WILLIAMS,RYAN 00111317-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 586.57 CHECK 465728 TOTAL: 586.57 465729 10/15/2021 PRTD 999997 WILLIAMSON,RONALD 00112618-09/16/2021 09/30/2021 20211015 281.65 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 35 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465729 TOTAL: 281.65 465730 10/15/2021 PRTD 100940 OWENS TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES INC 94806 09/15/2021 20211015 629.25 CHECK 465730 TOTAL: 629.25 465731 10/15/2021 PRTD 100940 OWENS TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES INC 94843 09/16/2021 20211015 600.00 CHECK 465731 TOTAL: 600.00 465732 10/15/2021 PRTD 136189 P & W GOLF SUPPLY LLC INV80800-1 08/04/2021 20211015 102.28 CHECK 465732 TOTAL: 102.28 465733 10/15/2021 PRTD 137491 PARTY UNIT 780807 09/15/2021 20211015 450.00 CHECK 465733 TOTAL: 450.00 465734 10/15/2021 PRTD 141258 PEMBER COMPANIES INC 12464 08/17/2021 20211015 44,353.87 CHECK 465734 TOTAL: 44,353.87 465735 10/15/2021 PRTD 149249 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-119202 09/30/2021 20211015 616.50 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-119203 09/30/2021 20211015 144.00 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-118825 09/30/2021 20211015 96.00 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-119205 09/30/2021 20211015 96.00 CHECK 465735 TOTAL: 952.50 465736 10/15/2021 PRTD 130228 PERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC 091721-12 09/17/2021 20211015 200.00 CHECK 465736 TOTAL: 200.00 465737 10/15/2021 PRTD 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC 365956 09/15/2021 20211015 2,223.86 CHECK 465737 TOTAL: 2,223.86 465738 10/15/2021 PRTD 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 210550917 09/16/2021 20211015 1,041.44 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 36 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465738 TOTAL: 1,041.44 465739 10/15/2021 PRTD 131291 PPG ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES 985103119665 09/17/2021 20211015 48.74 CHECK 465739 TOTAL: 48.74 465740 10/15/2021 PRTD 125979 PRECISE MRM LLC 200-1032468 08/31/2021 20211015 1,050.00 CHECK 465740 TOTAL: 1,050.00 465741 10/15/2021 PRTD 124831 PRESSWRITE PRINTING INC 084015 09/14/2021 20211015 339.00 CHECK 465741 TOTAL: 339.00 465742 10/15/2021 PRTD 129470 PROFESSIONAL OFFICE SERVICES 003242491 09/13/2021 20211015 1,268.79 CHECK 465742 TOTAL: 1,268.79 465743 10/15/2021 PRTD 106322 SCHENCK, DAVID 158951 09/14/2021 20211015 595.82 SCHENCK, DAVID 158945 09/14/2021 20211015 1,354.41 SCHENCK, DAVID 158965 09/14/2021 20211015 200.99 CHECK 465743 TOTAL: 2,151.22 465744 10/15/2021 PRTD 143618 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-27816 09/29/2021 20211015 380.00 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-27817 09/29/2021 20211015 532.00 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-27815 09/29/2021 20211015 228.00 CHECK 465744 TOTAL: 1,140.00 465745 10/15/2021 PRTD 112097 PUMP & METER SERVICE 514797 09/17/2021 20211015 122.00 PUMP & METER SERVICE 514712 09/17/2021 20211015 106.05 CHECK 465745 TOTAL: 228.05 465746 10/15/2021 PRTD 100763 QUADIENT, INC N9047106 09/15/2021 20211015 979.23 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 37 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465746 TOTAL: 979.23 465747 10/15/2021 PRTD 135833 QUALITY FORKLIFT SALES AND SERVIC P00308 09/16/2021 20211015 811.99 QUALITY FORKLIFT SALES AND SERVIC P00316 09/17/2021 20211015 118.35 QUALITY FORKLIFT SALES AND SERVIC P00326 09/17/2021 20211015 19.79 CHECK 465747 TOTAL: 950.13 465748 10/15/2021 PRTD 138267 QUALITY LOCKSMITH INC QLS20877 09/14/2021 20211015 722.17 CHECK 465748 TOTAL: 722.17 465749 10/15/2021 PRTD 133627 REPUBLIC SERVICES #894 0894-005513684 09/30/2021 20211015 68,151.79 REPUBLIC SERVICES #894 0894-005507786 09/25/2021 20211015 2,753.48 CHECK 465749 TOTAL: 70,905.27 465750 10/15/2021 PRTD 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 82978 09/16/2021 20211015 167.00 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 82977 09/16/2021 20211015 644.00 CHECK 465750 TOTAL: 811.00 465751 10/15/2021 PRTD 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 1928599148 09/14/2021 20211015 151.97 CHECK 465751 TOTAL: 151.97 465752 10/15/2021 PRTD 101659 ORKIN 215700952 09/14/2021 20211015 63.00 ORKIN 215700540 09/17/2021 20211015 149.47 CHECK 465752 TOTAL: 212.47 465753 10/15/2021 PRTD 119000 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA FOUNDATION 1997 09/14/2021 20211015 1,250.00 CHECK 465753 TOTAL: 1,250.00 465754 10/15/2021 PRTD 144553 SALTCO LLC 70397 09/15/2021 20211015 70.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 38 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465754 TOTAL: 70.00 465755 10/15/2021 PRTD 141332 SOUTHTOWN INC W44444 09/20/2021 20211015 7,208.88 CHECK 465755 TOTAL: 7,208.88 465756 10/15/2021 PRTD 141332 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC W69205 09/14/2021 20211015 1,671.06 CHECK 465756 TOTAL: 1,671.06 465757 10/15/2021 PRTD 144403 SENTEXT SOLUTIONS 230602 09/20/2021 20211015 299.00 CHECK 465757 TOTAL: 299.00 465758 10/15/2021 PRTD 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC 63738 09/15/2021 20211015 223.50 CHECK 465758 TOTAL: 223.50 465759 10/15/2021 PRTD 132210 RUSCIANO GROUP 67165 09/17/2021 20211015 755.00 CHECK 465759 TOTAL: 755.00 465760 10/15/2021 PRTD 134643 SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUN SALES000000006996 08/31/2021 22100020 20211015 22,230.00 CHECK 465760 TOTAL: 22,230.00 465761 10/15/2021 PRTD 100995 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 411448 09/14/2021 20211015 116.76 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 411825 09/15/2021 20211015 5,858.53 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 412301 09/17/2021 20211015 377.63 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 412302 09/17/2021 20211015 780.00 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 412303 09/17/2021 20211015 652.64 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 412304 09/17/2021 20211015 888.77 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 412516 09/20/2021 20211015 4,807.77 SHORT-ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INCORPOR 412566 09/20/2021 20211015 415.80 CHECK 465761 TOTAL: 13,897.90 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 39 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465762 10/15/2021 PRTD 120784 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 16507 09/10/2021 20211015 295.96 CHECK 465762 TOTAL: 295.96 465763 10/15/2021 PRTD 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 112945241-001 09/15/2021 20211015 44.62 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 113070292-001 09/20/2021 20211015 104.07 CHECK 465763 TOTAL: 148.69 465764 10/15/2021 PRTD 132195 SMALL LOT MN MN46189 09/28/2021 20211015 484.88 SMALL LOT MN MN46188 09/28/2021 20211015 164.96 CHECK 465764 TOTAL: 649.84 465765 10/15/2021 PRTD 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL ARS/15279507 09/17/2021 20211015 130.00 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL ARV/49763348 09/20/2021 20211015 67.02 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 48777805 10/06/2021 20211015 -69.45 CHECK 465765 TOTAL: 127.57 465766 10/15/2021 PRTD 101000 RJM PRINTING INC 117591012 09/07/2021 20211015 83.80 RJM PRINTING INC 117489012 09/08/2021 20211015 120.73 RJM PRINTING INC 117708011 09/15/2021 20211015 49.64 RJM PRINTING INC 117709012 09/14/2021 20211015 89.64 RJM PRINTING INC 117744013 09/14/2021 20211015 120.73 CHECK 465766 TOTAL: 464.54 465767 10/15/2021 PRTD 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 10054 09/17/2021 20211015 300.00 CHECK 465767 TOTAL: 300.00 465768 10/15/2021 PRTD 127878 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2128783 09/24/2021 20211015 113.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2129970 09/29/2021 20211015 321.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2129973 09/29/2021 20211015 1,253.80 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 40 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2129976 09/29/2021 20211015 902.18 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2129971 09/29/2021 20211015 228.00 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2129972 09/29/2021 20211015 80.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2129969 09/29/2021 20211015 409.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2129975 09/29/2021 20211015 3,220.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2129974 09/29/2021 20211015 506.40 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2129963 09/29/2021 20211015 384.10 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2129967 09/29/2021 20211015 879.20 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2129966 09/29/2021 20211015 1,286.10 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2129968 09/29/2021 20211015 899.00 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2129965 09/29/2021 20211015 2,170.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2129964 09/29/2021 20211015 643.20 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2129962 09/29/2021 20211015 40.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2129957 09/29/2021 20211015 161.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2129960 09/29/2021 20211015 198.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2129958 09/29/2021 20211015 300.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2129959 09/29/2021 20211015 96.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2129961 09/29/2021 20211015 1,680.40 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 9300066 09/24/2021 20211015 -234.00 CHECK 465768 TOTAL: 15,544.38 465769 10/15/2021 PRTD 104672 SPRINT SPECTRUM LP 273184124-266 09/18/2021 20211015 135.20 CHECK 465769 TOTAL: 135.20 465770 10/15/2021 PRTD 146960 STACKED DECK BREWING 003104 09/23/2021 20211015 280.00 STACKED DECK BREWING 003113 09/28/2021 20211015 192.00 STACKED DECK BREWING 003114 09/28/2021 20211015 192.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 41 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET STACKED DECK BREWING 003115 09/29/2021 20211015 192.00 CHECK 465770 TOTAL: 856.00 465771 10/15/2021 PRTD 145599 SSI MN TRANCHE 1 LLC 19713 09/16/2021 20211015 37,033.71 CHECK 465771 TOTAL: 37,033.71 465772 10/15/2021 PRTD 145599 SSI MN TRANCHE 2 LLC 19714 09/16/2021 20211015 9,167.33 CHECK 465772 TOTAL: 9,167.33 465773 10/15/2021 PRTD 100438 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC 1834491 09/20/2021 20211015 7,500.00 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC 1834494 09/20/2021 20211015 2,424.88 CHECK 465773 TOTAL: 9,924.88 465774 10/15/2021 PRTD 101007 STAR TRIBUNE MEDIA INTERMEDIATE H I00403798-09292021 09/30/2021 20211015 600.00 CHECK 465774 TOTAL: 600.00 465775 10/15/2021 PRTD 139006 OFFICE OF MNIT SERVICES W21080565 09/15/2021 20211015 5,111.41 CHECK 465775 TOTAL: 5,111.41 465776 10/15/2021 PRTD 139006 OFFICE OF MNIT SERVICES W21080568 09/15/2021 20211015 308.70 CHECK 465776 TOTAL: 308.70 465777 10/15/2021 PRTD 139006 OFFICE OF MNIT SERVICES W21010579 02/12/2021 20211015 3,468.61 CHECK 465777 TOTAL: 3,468.61 465778 10/15/2021 PRTD 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 42454 09/29/2021 20211015 165.00 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 42455 09/29/2021 20211015 165.00 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 42456 09/29/2021 20211015 144.00 CHECK 465778 TOTAL: 474.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 42 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465779 10/15/2021 PRTD 101015 STREICHERS INC I1524425 09/15/2021 20211015 239.98 CHECK 465779 TOTAL: 239.98 465780 10/15/2021 PRTD 135803 SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CAN Sept 2021 09/17/2021 20211015 2,916.18 SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CAN Sept 2021 #1 09/17/2021 20211015 5,095.17 SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CAN Sept 2021 #2 09/17/2021 20211015 7,022.50 SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CAN Sept 2021 #3 09/17/2021 20211015 385.25 CHECK 465780 TOTAL: 15,419.10 465781 10/15/2021 PRTD 142316 T-MOBILE USA INC 477067848-9/21 09/27/2021 20211015 35.00 CHECK 465781 TOTAL: 35.00 465782 10/15/2021 PRTD 126924 CAN HOLDINGS INC 3549 09/16/2021 20211015 481.00 CAN HOLDINGS INC 24609 09/16/2021 20211015 481.00 CHECK 465782 TOTAL: 962.00 465783 10/15/2021 PRTD 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY INC 74137-00 09/15/2021 20211015 98.63 CHECK 465783 TOTAL: 98.63 465784 10/15/2021 PRTD 129923 CONTEMPORARY INC V796329 09/17/2021 20211015 37.49 CHECK 465784 TOTAL: 37.49 465785 10/15/2021 PRTD 134673 TOTAL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INC S1608 09/15/2021 20211015 4,019.48 TOTAL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INC S1617 09/15/2021 20211015 352.20 CHECK 465785 TOTAL: 4,371.68 465786 10/15/2021 PRTD 136342 TRAVISMATHEW LLC 90385935 09/16/2021 20211015 92.70 CHECK 465786 TOTAL: 92.70 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 43 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465787 10/15/2021 PRTD 138581 TRUST IN US LLC 91547 09/14/2021 20211015 20.00 TRUST IN US LLC 91598 09/17/2021 20211015 20.00 CHECK 465787 TOTAL: 40.00 465788 10/15/2021 PRTD 103973 ULINE INC 138610709 09/14/2021 20211015 175.06 ULINE INC 138669108 09/15/2021 20211015 228.63 CHECK 465788 TOTAL: 403.69 465789 10/15/2021 PRTD 142790 UNDERGROUND UTILITY SPECIALTIES I 458 09/17/2021 20211015 4,985.00 CHECK 465789 TOTAL: 4,985.00 465790 10/15/2021 PRTD 140009 US KIDS GOLF LLC IN2028433 09/14/2021 20211015 410.15 US KIDS GOLF LLC IN2028465 09/14/2021 20211015 234.68 CHECK 465790 TOTAL: 644.83 465791 10/15/2021 PRTD 144033 USS MINNESOTA ONE MT LLC 19712 09/16/2021 20211015 6,997.29 CHECK 465791 TOTAL: 6,997.29 465792 10/15/2021 PRTD 143763 VALLEY APPLE FORD INC A1CB658549 09/20/2021 20211015 39.12 CHECK 465792 TOTAL: 39.12 465793 10/15/2021 PRTD 101058 VAN PAPER COMPANY 587384-00 09/15/2021 20211015 917.75 CHECK 465793 TOTAL: 917.75 465794 10/15/2021 PRTD 144209 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 2844 09/22/2021 20211015 186.00 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 2842 09/22/2021 20211015 174.00 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 2843 09/22/2021 20211015 174.00 CHECK 465794 TOTAL: 534.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 44 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465795 10/15/2021 PRTD 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES 69000 09/16/2021 20211015 304.42 CHECK 465795 TOTAL: 304.42 465796 10/15/2021 PRTD 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S005088568.001 09/16/2021 20211015 138.99 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S005073372.001 09/20/2021 20211015 42.64 CHECK 465796 TOTAL: 181.63 465797 10/15/2021 PRTD 160216 NEW VISION TECHNOLOGIES LLC 14535 08/08/2021 20211015 450.18 CHECK 465797 TOTAL: 450.18 465798 10/15/2021 PRTD 119454 VINOCOPIA INC 0287829-IN 09/30/2021 20211015 421.00 VINOCOPIA INC 0287828-IN 09/30/2021 20211015 306.50 VINOCOPIA INC 0287830-IN 09/30/2021 20211015 169.00 VINOCOPIA INC 0287836-IN 09/30/2021 20211015 127.50 VINOCOPIA INC 0287835-IN 09/30/2021 20211015 1,360.25 VINOCOPIA INC 0287837-IN 09/30/2021 20211015 161.25 VINOCOPIA INC 0287834-IN 09/30/2021 20211015 121.25 VINOCOPIA INC 0287833-IN 09/30/2021 20211015 377.50 VINOCOPIA INC 0287831-IN 09/30/2021 20211015 740.50 CHECK 465798 TOTAL: 3,784.75 465799 10/15/2021 PRTD 120627 PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP INC 61944479 09/17/2021 20211015 489.78 CHECK 465799 TOTAL: 489.78 465800 10/15/2021 PRTD 151681 WALKER LAWN CARE INC 8765 09/17/2021 20211015 3,600.00 CHECK 465800 TOTAL: 3,600.00 465801 10/15/2021 PRTD 142351 WATCHGUARD VIDEO 4REINV0013203 08/23/2021 20211015 5,370.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 45 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465801 TOTAL: 5,370.00 465802 10/15/2021 PRTD 135181 WATERFORD OIL CO INC 131899 09/14/2021 20211015 2,156.37 WATERFORD OIL CO INC 122968 07/07/2021 20211015 1,614.04 CHECK 465802 TOTAL: 3,770.41 465803 10/15/2021 PRTD 120816 WEST COAST TRENDS INC 40614937 09/14/2021 20211015 227.84 CHECK 465803 TOTAL: 227.84 465804 10/15/2021 PRTD 101033 WINE COMPANY 184624 09/29/2021 20211015 1,891.80 WINE COMPANY 184622 09/29/2021 20211015 825.20 WINE COMPANY 184989 09/30/2021 20211015 -36.00 CHECK 465804 TOTAL: 2,681.00 465805 10/15/2021 PRTD 118395 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC E2099198 09/20/2021 20211015 50.98 CHECK 465805 TOTAL: 50.98 465806 10/15/2021 PRTD 127774 WORLDWIDE CELLARS INC R21-54077 09/28/2021 20211015 164.08 WORLDWIDE CELLARS INC R21-54071 09/28/2021 20211015 233.38 CHECK 465806 TOTAL: 397.46 465807 10/15/2021 PRTD 160077 YETI HOLDINGS, INC 991681404 09/16/2021 20211015 162.49 CHECK 465807 TOTAL: 162.49 465808 10/15/2021 PRTD 101089 FIRST AID SERVICE INC 54090262 09/16/2021 20211015 87.45 CHECK 465808 TOTAL: 87.45 465809 10/15/2021 PRTD 101091 ZIEGLER INC IN000246127 09/14/2021 20211015 688.32 CHECK 465809 TOTAL: 688.32 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/14/2021 12:48User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 46 NUMBER OF CHECKS 341 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** 2,156,578.05 COUNT AMOUNT TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS 339 1,531,578.05 TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS 2 625,000.00 *** GRAND TOTAL *** 2,156,578.05 Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:Approve Pentagon Village LLC Redevelopment Agreement Amendment No. 3 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve amendment No. 3 to the Pentagon Village LLC Redevelopment Agreement and related amendment to Parking Easement Agreement. INTRODUCTION: This item pertains to the redevelopment of Lot 3 in the P entagon Village site. The TIF Redevelopment Agreement is proposed to be amended to reflect the change in use on Lot 3. The original extended-stay hotel project will be replaced with an apartment project. This change to the site plan was approved by the City Council on August 17, 2021. Amendments to the Redevelopment Agreement and the related Parking Facilities Easement Agreement have been prepared by the HRA's special legal counsel. Staff recommends approval of these amendments. ATTACHMENTS: Description Redevelopment Agreement Amendment No. 3 Parking Easement Amendment No. 1 4832-9697-7140\4 THIRD AMENDMENT to REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT by and among CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, and PENTAGON VILLAGE, LLC Dated as of October 19, 2021 THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Dorsey & Whitney LLP 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 1 4832-9697-7140\4 THIRD AMENDMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (Pentagon South) THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is made and entered into as of October 19, 2021 by and among the CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota statutory city (the “City”), the HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”) and PENTAGON VILLAGE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Redeveloper”). RECITALS A. The City, the Authority, and Redeveloper are parties to a Redevelopment Agreement dated October 16, 2018 (the “Original Agreement”), as amended by that certain First Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement dated February 5, 2019 (the “First Amendment”), as amended by that certain Second Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement dated September 1, 2020 (the “Second Amendment”, and together the Original Agreement, the First Amendment, and the Second Amendment, collectively with the, the “Existing Agreement”). B. Upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Existing Agreement, the Authority agreed to provide Redeveloper with certain TIF Assistance in connection with Redeveloper’s redevelopment of certain property located within in the City’s Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District, as such property more particularly described in the Existing Agreement. C. As set forth in the Existing Agreement, one of the conditions to the Authority providing Redeveloper tax increment financing assistance is Redeveloper’s construction of certain Minimum Improvements in accordance with the Pentagon South Final Development Plan (as previously amended by the First Amended Final Development Plan) and other Pentagon South City Approvals (as previously amended by the First Amended City Approvals). D. Redeveloper has requested the City’s regulatory approval of, and the City has approved pursuant to City Ordinance No. 2021-10 and City Council Resolution No. 2021-61 (collectively, the “Second Amended City Approvals”) certain modifications to the Pentagon South Final Development Plan (the “Second Amended Final Development Plan”), including, without limitation, approval of an Element to consist of an approximately 200-unit, 232,965 gross square foot, multi-family housing community to be constructed on Lot 3 of the Project Area (the “Lot 3 Residential Element”) in lieu of Hotel Element 2. E. Redeveloper has requested that the City and Authority consent to the Second Amended Final Development Plan and the corresponding changes to the “Elements” of the “Minimum Improvements” described in the Existing Agreement. F. Redeveloper intends to Transfer Lot 3 to Edina Apartments, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Lot 3 Owner”) for the purpose of Lot 3 Owner developing, constructing, owning, and operating the Lot 3 Residential Element, and Redeveloper has requested that the City and Authority consent to said Transfer of Lot 3 to Lot 3 Owner. 2 4832-9697-7140\4 G. Upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment, the City and Authority have agreed to consent to the Second Amended Final Development Plan and such Transfer to the Lot 3 Owner, and the parties have otherwise agreed to amend the Existing Agreement as set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the other as follows: 1. Recitals; Capitalized Terms. The Recitals are true and correct statements of fact and are incorporated into this Amendment by this reference, including the definitions set forth therein. Each capitalized term used herein and the Recitals, unless otherwise defined, shall have the respective meaning ascribed to such term in the Existing Agreement. The “Redevelopment Agreement” is the Existing Agreement as amended by this Amendment. 2. Defined Terms; Exhibits. For all purposes under the Redevelopment Agreement, the following capitalized terms are hereby amended as set forth below: (a) “Element” is hereby amended to include the Lot 3 Residential Element and remove “Hotel Element 2”. (b) “Pentagon South City Approvals” is hereby amended to mean the original Pentagon South City Approvals, as revised and amended by the First Amended Final Development Plan, the First Amended City Approvals, the Second Amended Final Development Plan, and the Second Amended City Approvals (c) “Pentagon South Final Development Plan” is hereby amended to mean, collectively, the First Amended Final Development Plan approved by the City pursuant to the First Amended City Approvals and the Second Amended Final Development Plan approved by the City pursuant to the Second Amended City Approvals. (d) All references to “Phase 1C” and “Phase 1C Minimum Improvements” are hereby amended to delete all references therein to the Hotel Element 2 and insert in its place the Lot 3 Residential Element as the anticipated Element to be constructed as part of Phase 1C. (e) “Project Area Map” The Project Area Map attached to the First Amendment as Exhibit A thereto is hereby amended and supplemented with the revised site plan for Lot 3 attached hereto as Exhibit A. Except as herein modified by Exhibit A attached hereto, the Project Area Map to the First Amendment as Exhibit A remains unchanged and in full force and effect. 3. Consent to City Approvals. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Amendment, and subject to the terms and limitations of Section 3.2 of the Original Agreement, the Authority and the City hereby consent to the Second Amended Final Development Plan and the Second Amended City Approvals, including, without limitation, the construction of the Lot 3 Residential Element on Lot 3 in lieu of Hotel Element 2. 4. Consent to Transfer. In accordance with Section 12.2 of the Original Agreement, the City and the Authority hereby consent to the Transfer of Lot 3 by Redeveloper to Lot 3 Owner for the purpose 3 4832-9697-7140\4 of Lot 3 Owner developing, constructing, owning, and operating the Lot 3 Residential Element. In connection with said Transfer, Redeveloper shall cause Lot 3 Owner to execute and deliver to the City and Authority the Acknowledgment attached to this Amendment (the “Lot 3 Acknowledgment”). Neither the City’s and Authority’s consent to such Transfer nor anything set forth in the Lot 3 Acknowledgment shall (a) release or relieve Redeveloper from, or otherwise modify, any of Redeveloper’s obligations under the Redevelopment Agreement and (b) be deemed to be a consent by the City or the Authority to any other or subsequent Transfer. Redeveloper shall cause Lot 3 Owner, its successors and assigns, to comply with all terms and conditions of the Redevelopment Agreement applicable to Lot 3, the Lot 3 Residential Element, and generally applicable to transferees of any portion of the Project Area. 5. Controlling Interest Transfer. Redeveloper acknowledges and agrees that the Transfer of Lot 3 to Lot 3 Owner as contemplated in this Agreement is a “Controlling Interest Transfer” under Section 7.4 of the Original Agreement and Redeveloper shall be responsible for all Redeveloper’s obligations under said Section 7.4, and otherwise in the Redevelopment Agreement, in connection with said Controlling Interest Transfer to Lot 3 Owner. 6. Hotel Transfers. Section 12.3 of the Original Agreement is hereby amended as necessary to delete all references to Lot 3 and Hotel Element 2. 7. Ratification. Except as specifically modified by this Amendment, the terms and provisions of the Existing Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 8. Binding Effect. This Amendment amends and supplements the Existing Agreement. If there is a conflict between the provisions of the Existing Agreement and this Amendment, the provisions of this Amendment shall control. This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the City, the Authority, Redeveloper, and their respective successors and assigns. 9. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed simultaneously in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature pages follow] [Signature Page to Third Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement (Pentagon South)] 4832-9697-7140\4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City, the Authority and Redeveloper have caused this Amendment to be duly executed in their names and on their behalf, all on or as of the date first above written. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: _____________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor By: _____________________________ Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _______________, 2021, by James B. Hovland and Scott H. Neal, the Mayor and City Manager, respectively, of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of the City of Edina. Notary Public [Signature Page to Third Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement (Pentagon South)] 4832-9697-7140\4 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: ______________________________ James B. Hovland, Chair By: ______________________________ James Pierce, Secretary STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _______________, 2021, by James B. Hovland and James Pierce, the Chair and Secretary, respectively, of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of said Authority. Notary Public [Signature Page to Third Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement (Pentagon South)] 4832-9697-7140\4 PENTAGON VILLAGE, LLC a Minnesota limited liability company By: ________________________________________ Name: ______________________________________ Its: ________________________________________ STATE OF _______________ ) ) ss. COUNTY OF _____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of _______________, 2021, by __________________, the _______________________ of PENTAGON VILLAGE, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. Notary Public [Acknowledgment of Redevelopment Agreement (Pentagon South)] 4832-9697-7140\4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT This Acknowledgment (this “Acknowledgment”) is made and executed as of this ____ day of _______________, 2021, by EDINA APARTMENTS, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, it successors and assigns (“Lot 3 Owner”). Lot 3 Owner, on behalf of itself and its success and/or assigns, hereby acknowledges and agrees that: 1. As of the date hereof, Lot 3 Owner is the fee owner of the following described property: Lot 3, Block 1, Pentagon Village, Hennepin County, Minnesota (“Lot 3”). 2. Lot 3 is subject to and encumbered by that certain Redevelopment Agreement dated October 16, 2018, by and among the CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota statutory city (the “City”), the HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”), and PENTAGON VILLAGE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Redeveloper”), as amended by that certain First Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement dated February 5, 2019, that certain Second Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement dated September 1, 2020, that certain Third Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement dated on or about an event date herewith, and as may be further amended, revised, and supplemented from time to time, all as evidenced by Memorandum of Redevelopment Agreement dated October 16, 2018 and recorded in the Office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota on October 26, 2018 as Document No. T05570956 (collectively, the “Redevelopment Agreement”). 3. Lot 3 Owner will be responsible for, and hereby assumes, the rights and obligations under the Redevelopment Agreement with respect to, and to the extent applicable to, the development, construction, operation, and maintenance of Lot 3 and any Element(s) constructed thereon. 4. This Acknowledgment may be recorded against Lot 3 in the Office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota and/or other appropriate real estate recording office(s). 5. Capitalized terms, when not defined herein, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Redevelopment Agreement. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature pages follow] [Acknowledgment of Redevelopment Agreement (Pentagon South)] 4832-9697-7140\4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Acknowledgment of the day and year first written above. EDINA APARTMENTS, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company By: ________________________________________ Name: ______________________________________ Its: ________________________________________ STATE OF _______________ ) ) ss. COUNTY OF _____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of _______________, 2021, by __________________, the _______________________ of Edina Apartments, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. Notary Public THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Dorsey & Whitney LLP (ACS) 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 [Exhibit A to Third Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement (Pentagon South)] 4832-9697-7140\4 EXHIBIT A Lot 3 Site Plan [See attached.] [Exhibit A to Third Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement (Pentagon South)] 4832-9697-7140\4 4818-0183-9092\1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO PARKING FACILITIES EASEMENT AGREEMENT (Pentagon Village) THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO PARKING FACILITIES EASEMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into this 19th day of October, 2021, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota statutory city (the “City”), and PENTAGON VILLAGE, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Owner”). RECITALS A. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”), the City, and Owner, as “Redeveloper”, are parties to that certain Redevelopment Agreement dated October 16, 2018 (the “Original Contract”), as amended by First Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement dated February 5, 2019 (the “First Amendment”), as amended by that certain Second Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement dated September 1, 2020 (the “Second Amendment”) and as amended by that certain Third Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement dated as of an even date herewith (the “Third Amendment”, together the Original Contract, the First Amendment, and the Second Amendment, and as the same may be further amended, modified, supplemented, or replaced from time to time, collectively, the “Contract”). B. Such Contract provides for the redevelopment by Owner of the Project Area (as defined in the Contract) and located within the Pentagon Park Tax Incremental Financing district, established by the Authority pursuant to Resolution No. 2014-23, in coordination with the Authority and with the cooperation and assistance of the City. C. Pursuant to the Contract, the City and Owner entered into and parties to that certain Parking Facilities Easement Agreement (Pentagon South) dated as of August 5, 2020 (the “Original Easement Agreement”), filed September 17, 2020 in the office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, as Document No. 5747534. D. As reflected in the Third Amendment, the Authority and the City have consented to certain modifications to the Pentagon South Final Development Plan (as defined in the Contract) and certain changes to the Pentagon South City Approvals (as defined in the Contract), including, without limitation, approval of an Element to consist of an approximately 200-unit multi-family housing community to be constructed on Lot 3 of the Project Area (the “Lot 3 Residential Element”). E. In connection with the approval of the Lot 3 Residential Element, the City and Owner desire to amend the Original Easement Agreement upon the terms and conditions of this Amendment. 2 4818-0183-9092\1 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the other as follows: 1. Recitals; Capitalized Terms. The Recitals are true and correct statements of fact and are incorporated into this Amendment by this reference, including the definitions set forth therein. Each capitalized term used herein and the Recitals, unless otherwise defined, shall have the respective meaning ascribed to such term in the Original Easement Agreement. The “Easement Agreement” is the Original Easement Agreement as amended by this Amendment. 2. Defined Terms. For all purposes under the Easement Agreement, the following capitalized terms are hereby amended to have the meanings set forth below: (a) All references to the “Contract” in the Easement Agreement are hereby amended to mean and be the “Contract” as defined in this Amendment. (b) All references to the “Development Contract” in the Easement Agreement are hereby amended to mean and be the “Pentagon South Development Contract” as defined in the Contract. (c) All references to the “Final Development Plan” in the Easement Agreement are hereby amended to mean and be the “Pentagon South Final Development Plan” as defined in the Contract. 3. Use of Parking Premises by Residential Users. Notwithstanding anything in the Original Easement Agreement to the contrary, but subject to the terms and conditions of this Section 3, the tenants, residents, occupants of the Lot 3 Residential Element, and their respective permittees and invitees (collectively, “Residential Users”) may use the Easement Premises for their respective purposes under the Easement Agreement on a non-exclusive, unreserved basis and otherwise upon the same terms and conditions of the general public under the Easement Agreement; provided, however, for avoidance of doubt, no Residential Users shall be deemed or considered a “Private Party” under the Easement Agreement and, accordingly, without limitation, Owner may not, and shall not, reserve any parking stalls or EV charging stations within the Parking Premises for exclusive use by or for the Residential Users. 4. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 5. Ratification. Except as amended by this Amendment, all of the terms, covenants, and conditions of the Original Easement Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed. In the event of a conflict between the terms of the Original Easement Agreement and the terms of this Amendment, the terms of this Amendment shall control. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature pages follow] Signature Page to First Amendment to Parking Facilities Easement Agreement (Pentagon Village) 4818-0183-9092\1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Owner and City have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above. CITY: CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: _________________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor By: _________________________________________ Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _______ day of __________________, 2021, by James B. Hovland and Scott H. Neal, the Mayor and City Manager respectively, of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of the City. ____________________________________________ Notary Public Signature Page to First Amendment to Parking Facilities Easement Agreement (Pentagon Village) 4818-0183-9092\1 OWNER: PENTAGON VILLAGE, LLC a Minnesota limited liability company By: _________________________________________ Name: _______________________________________ Its __________________________________________ STATE OF _______________ ) ) ss. COUNTY OF _____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of _______________, 2021, by __________________________, the ____________________________ of PENTAGON VILLAGE, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. Notary Public 4818-0183-9092\1 CONSENT AND SUBORDINATION The undersigned, Old National Bank, a national banking association, holder of that certain Mortgage, Security Agreement, Fixture Financing Statement and Assignment of Leases and Rents executed by Pentagon Village, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, dated May 7, 2019, filed May 8, 2019, as Document No. T05611798, as amended by that certain Amendment to Mortgage, Security Agreement, Fixture Financing Statement and Assignment of Leases and Rents, executed by Pentagon Village, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company dated June 24, 2019, filed July 25, 2019, as Document No. T05629368, and as further as amended by that certain Second Amendment to Mortgage. Security Agreement, Fixture Financing Statement and Assignment of Leases and Rents dated January 22, 2020, recorded on June 19, 2020 as Document No. 05718889 in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, in favor of Old National Bank (the “Mortgage”), hereby consents to the foregoing First Amendment to Parking Facilities Easement Agreement (Pentagon South) (the “First Amendment”), and hereby subjects and subordinates the Mortgage and all of its right, title and interest in and to the First Amendment and the Existing Easement Agreement (as defined in the First Amendment), as amended by First Amendment. OLD NATIONAL BANK, a national banking association By: _________________________________________ Name: _______________________________________ Title: ________________________________________ STATE OF ______________ ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of ____________, 201___, by ____________________, the _________________ of Old National Bank, a national banking association, on behalf of the bank. ____________________________________________ Notary Public Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Gunnar Kaasa, Equipment Operations Supervisor Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Two Trackless Snow Machines Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase of two Trackless snow machines from MacQueen Equipment LLC for $250,198. INTRODUCTION: The purchase will replace 25-480, 2003 Trackless vehicle with 4231 hours, and 25-485, 2007 Trackless vehicle with 2362 hours. The old Trackless have no EPA rating for pollution control, while the new Trackless are tier 4 diesel engine with better fuel mileage and less pollution. Our new equipment replacement scoring methodology uses six performance and cost variables including age, usage, type of service, condition, repair costs and reliability. Replacement qualification scores are 23 for all sedans and light trucks and 28 for heavy duty vehicles and off-road equipment whose gross weight rating exceeds 10,500. The higher the score, the higher the need to replace the vehicle. In other words, we will not replace a heavy duty vehicle that does not have a minimum score of 28. This piece of equipment has a score of 31 for 25-485 and 34 for 25-480. See attached Request for P urchase. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Two Trackless Snow Machines Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12100210 Department:Public Works Buyer:Brian Olson Date: 10/06/2021 Requisition Description:2- Trackless snow Machines Vendor:MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT LLC Cost:$250,198.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:STATE K - STATE CONTRACT DESCRIPTION:sidewalk snow removal machimes BUDGET IMPACT: Equipment replacement found 2022 Environmental Impact - item specific: 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT:will get better fuel mileage, omit less pollution ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:update older vehicle Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle:2005 & 2007 Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): 2021 Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? YES - YES Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: - MPG:no info Carbon Emissions: Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Gunnar Kaasa, Equipment Operations Supervisor Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Multiquip Generator Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for a 2022 Multiquip generator from Multiquip Inc for $36,629. INTRODUCTION: The new generator will replace a 22 year old generator that has no diesel engine compliance. The new generator is a tier 4 diesel, has better fuel mileage, omits less fumes and is quieter. Our new equipment replacement scoring methodology uses six performance and cost variables including age, usage, type of service, condition, repair costs and reliability. Replacement qualification scores are 23 for all sedans and light trucks and 28 for heavy duty vehicles and off-road equipment whose gross weight rating exceeds 10,500. The higher the score, the higher the need to replace the vehicle. In other words, we will not replace a heavy duty vehicle that does not have a minimum score of 28. This piece of equipment has a score of 28. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Multiquip Generator Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12100198 Department:Public Works Buyer:Brian Olson Date: 09/29/2021 Requisition Description:Multiquip generator Vendor:MULTIQUIP INC Cost:$36,629.20 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:STATE K - STATE CONTRACT DESCRIPTION:update old generator BUDGET IMPACT: utility equipment fund Environmental Impact - item specific: 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT:very quiet generator ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:Less carbon Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle:2022 Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): 1999 Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? YES - YES Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: - MPG:30% reduct Carbon Emissions:Less carbo Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Gunnar Kaasa, Equipment Operations Supervisor Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: 2022 Ford F550 with Service Body and Crane Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase of 2022 Ford F550 Truck from Boyer Ford for $50,234 and with service body and crane from Aspen Equipment for $78,775 for a total cost of $129,009. INTRODUCTION: Boyer Ford will provide the Ford F550 Truck and Aspen Equipment will provide the service body and crane and install it on the Ford F550 Truck. This is a replacement for Vehicle 70-342, a 2011 Ford F500 Truck with a service body and crane that has 84,601 miles and 8520 hours on engine.The vehicle has outlived its useful life and needs replacement. The truck's diesel engine meets the green fleet policy. Our new equipment replacement scoring methodology uses six performance and cost variables including age, usage, type of service, condition, repair costs and reliability. Replacement qualification scores are 23 for all sedans and light trucks and 28 for heavy duty vehicles and off-road equipment whose gross weight rating exceeds 10,500. The higher the score, the higher the need to replace the vehicle. In other words, we will not replace a heavy duty vehicle that does not have a minimum score of 28. This piece of equipment has a score of 33. See attached Request for P urchase. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: 2022 Ford F550 with Service Body and Crane Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12100199 Department:Public Works Buyer:Brian Olson Date: 09/28/2021 Requisition Description:Ford F550 with service body and crane Vendor:BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC Cost:$129,009.90 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:STATE K - STATE CONTRACT DESCRIPTION:replace older F550 in utility BUDGET IMPACT: equipment replacement fund Environmental Impact - item specific: 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT:Less carbon ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:Less carbon Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle:2022 Ford F550 Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): 2011 f550 Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? YES - YES Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: - MPG:30% reduct Carbon Emissions:no info Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.G. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Perry Vetter, Parks and Recreation Director Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Edina Liquor Advertising Contract Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for Edina Liquor advertising with Comcast Spotlight for $40,000. INTRODUCTION: This is a service contract with Comcast Spotlight to provide advertising services for marketing. The contract is within budget allocations for 2021 and 2022 and is funded through the Edina Liquor enterprise. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Advertising Services Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12100216 Department:Parks & Recreation Buyer:Kersten McManamon Date: 10/12/2021 Requisition Description:2021-2022 Edina Liquor OTT Advertising Contract Vendor:COMCAST SPOTLIGHT Cost:$40,000.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:NEW - NEW PURCHASE SOURCE:SERVIC K - SERVICE CONTRACT DESCRIPTION:Q4 2021 - Q2 2022 advertising for Edina Liquor BUDGET IMPACT: Within allocated budget for 2021-2022 Environmental Impact - item specific: 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT:No impact on residents ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:N/A Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle:N/A Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): N/A Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? YES - YES Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: - MPG:N/A Carbon Emissions:N/A Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.H. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation, Other From:Jessica V. Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-91: Authorizing Flood Hazard Mitigation Grant Assistance Application Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution 2021-91, authorizing Flood Hazard Mitigation Grant Assistance application. INTRODUCTION: The Flood Hazard Mitigation Grant Assistance Program (FHM) was created by the Minnesota Legislature in 1987 to provide technical and financial assistance to local government units for reducing the damaging effects of floods. Under this program the state can make cost-share grants to local units of government for up to 50 percent of the total cost of a project. The goal of existing regulations and programs for flood damage reduction is to minimize the threat to life and property from flooding. The efforts of local governments to enforce their zoning ordinances, to sponsor flood mitigation public improvement projects, and to acquire or relocate flood-prone buildings have significantly helped to reduce risk to lives and flood damages across the state The potential grant funding would apply to the proposed pump station for the Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-91: Authorizing Flood Hazard Mitigation Grant Assistance Application RESOLUTION NO. 2021-91 FLOOD HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT ASSISTANCE WHEREAS, the City of Edina, hereinafter referred to as the “Applicant” act as legal sponsor for the project contained in the Flood Damage Reduction Grant Assistance Program Application to be submitted on October 22, 2021 and that Engineering Director is hereby authorized to apply to the Department of Natural Resources for funding of this project on behalf of the Applicant; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance, and the institutional, administrative, and managerial capability to ensure adequate acquisition, maintenance and protection of the proposed project; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has the financial capability to provide any required matching funds; and WHEREAS, the source of Applicant’s matching funds shall not include other State funds; and WHEREAS, the source of Applicant’s matching funds shall be up to $250,000 from the Stormwater Utility Fund; and WHEREAS, the Applicant hereby pledges to complete the project or phase if it exceeds the total funding provided by the Department of Natural Resources and any required local match; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has not incurred any costs, and has not entered into any written agreements to purchase property proposed by this project; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has not violated any Federal, State, or local laws pertaining to fraud, bribery, graft, kickbacks, collusion, conflict of interest or other unlawful or corrupt practice; and WHEREAS, upon approval of its application by the state, the Applicant may enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota for the above- references project, and that the Applicant certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the contract agreement; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Engineering Director is hereby authorized to execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant. Adopted this 19th day of October, 2021. Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 19, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _____ day of __________, 2021. _______________________________ City Clerk Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.I. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Resolution 2021-92: Setting Public Hearing Date for Municipal Consent of MnDOT I-494 Airport to Highway 169 Project Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution 2021-92, setting public hearing date for municipal consent of MnDOT I-494 Airport to Highway 169 project. INTRODUCTION: MnDOT is in the process of developing Project 1 of the I-494 Corridor Vision for opening bids in 2023 as a design-build project. T his project is anticipated to address traffic congestion in the region, improve safety for all modes and provide a transit advantage. No cost participation on behalf of the City of Edina is expected. MnDOT is asking the City of Edina to approve the proposed layout as it requires the acquisition of right-of-way and creates additional capacity. MnDOT will attend the public hearing to present the final layout and answer questions. To hold the public hearing, City Council must adopt a resolution setting the date. Staff recommends that the hearing date be set for December 7, 2021. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution 2021-92: Setting Public Hearing Date MnDOT Municipal Consent Letter MN State Statutes 161.162-167 Project 1 Layout (1 of 2) Project 1 Layout (2 of 2) RESOLUTION NO. 2021-92 CALLING PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF MUNICIPAL CONSENT FOR MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION’S I-494 AIRPORT TO HIGHWAY 169 PROJECT DECEMBER 7, 2021 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, that a public hearing shall be held on the 7th day of December, 2021 in the Council Chambers at City Hall at 7:00 p.m. to consider municipal consent for MnDOT’s I-494: Airport to Highway 169 Project (also known as Project 1 of the I-494 Corridor Vision). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing as required by law. Dated: October 19, 2021 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of October 19, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Special Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of __________, 20___. _______________________________ City Clerk Metropolitan District 1500 West County Road B2 Roseville, MN 55113 September 24, 2021 Chad Millner City of Edina – Engineering Director 4801 W 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Millner, MnDOT is in the process of developing Project 1 of the I-494 Corridor Vision. Project 1 will construct an E-ZPass lane on I-494 from TH 100 to I-35W in each direction, a turbine interchange at the I-494 over I-35W interchange, and change access at Nicollet, Portland, and 12th Avenues. This work will also include the replacement of the bridges at Nicollet, Portland, and 12th Avenues, as well as construct a new pedestrian/bicycle bridge near Chicago Avenue. Construction will include replacement of existing pavement, drainage, construction of retaining walls, sidewalks, bike lanes, signing, lighting, and traffic management. Project 1 is being developed for a letting on April 19, 2023 as a design-build project. Project 1 proposes the following benefits to the region: • Reduce traffic congestion and improve reliability of the average rush-hour trip • Improve safety for all modes • Provide a transit advantage to increase the number of people who can be efficiently moved through the area • Restore pavement to preserve infrastructure and provide a smoother ride • Preserve existing bridges • Improve drainage systems to reduce localized flooding and reduce run-off into the Minnesota River • Improve connectivity for pedestrians and bicyclists crossing I-494 Project 1 is the first of four phases of the I-494 Corridor Vision Implementation Plan which looks to construct managed lanes from Highway 169 to the Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport. The Implementation Plan was determined using a set of criteria which included constructability, community support, equity, asset management, cost/funding, and operations/safety. MnDOT is asking the City of Edina to approve the proposed layout as it requires the acquisition of right of way and is adding additional capacity. Municipal consent of MnDOT projects is described in Minnesota Statutes 161.162 through 161.167 (attached). The deadlines (per MN Statute 161.164) for the City’s responsibilities regarding municipal consent of the attached layout are as follows: • Within 15 days of receiving the final layout, schedule a public hearing. • Within 60 days of receiving the final layout, conduct the public hearing. • Provide at least 30 days’ notice of the public hearing. • Within 90 days of the public hearing, approve or disapprove the layout by resolution. MnDOT will attend the public hearing to present the final layout and answer questions, as required by statute. At this point, the total participation required by the city is estimated to be approximately $0 as identified in the attached estimate which is still being discussed with the cities and Hennepin County. Any cost participation and identified maintenance responsibilities will be handled as part of a cooperative construction agreement developed between MnDOT and the City. I would be happy to work with you as we traverse our way through this process. MnDOT will be available to give presentations and/or answer any questions that you may have regarding Project 1 or this process. Sincerely, Amber Blanchard, P.E. MnDOT Metro District Major Projects Manager/I494 Corridor Director CC: Andrew Lutaya, MnDOT West Area Engineer/Project Manager April Crockett, MnDOT West Area Manager file Equal Opportunity Employer 2020 Minnesota Statutes 161.162 DEFINITIONS. Subdivision 1.Applicability. The terms in sections 161.162 to 161.167 have the meanings given them in this section and section 160.02. § Subd. 2.Final layout. (a) "Final layout" means geometric layouts and supplemental drawings that show the location, character, dimensions, access, and explanatory information about the highway construction or improvement work being proposed. "Final layout" includes, where applicable, traffic lanes, shoulders, trails, intersections, signals, bridges, approximate right- of-way limits, existing ground line and proposed grade line of the highway, turn lanes, access points and closures, sidewalks, proposed design speed, noise walls, transit considerations, auxiliary lanes, interchange locations, interchange types, sensitive areas, existing right-of- way, traffic volume and turning movements, location of storm water drainage, location of municipal utilities, project schedule and estimated cost, and the name of the project manager. (b) "Final layout" does not include a cost participation agreement. For purposes of this subdivision "cost participation agreement" means a document signed by the commissioner and the governing body of a municipality that states the costs of a highway construction project that will be paid by the municipality. Subd. 3.Final construction plan. "Final construction plan" means the set of technical drawings for the construction or improvement of a trunk highway provided to contractors for bids. Subd. 4.Governing body. "Governing body" means the elected council of a municipality. Subd. 5.Municipality. "Municipality" means a statutory or home rule charter city. History: 2001 c 191 s 3; 2002 c 364 s 3 161.163 HIGHWAY PROJECT REVIEW. Subdivision 1.Projects requiring review. Sections 161.162 to 161.167 apply only to projects that alter access, increase or reduce highway traffic capacity, or require acquisition of permanent rights-of-way. Subd. 2.Traffic safety measures. Nothing contained in sections 161.162 to 161.167 limits the power of the commissioner to regulate traffic or install traffic-control devices or other safety measures on trunk highways located within municipalities regardless of their impact on access or traffic capacity or on the need for additional right-of-way. Subd. 3.Construction program. Nothing contained in sections 161.162 to 161.167 limits the commissioner's discretion to determine priority and programming of trunk highway projects. History: 2001 c 191 s 4 161.164 FINAL LAYOUT APPROVAL PROCESS. Subdivision 1.Submission of final layout. Before proceeding with the construction, reconstruction, or improvement of any route on the trunk highway system lying within any municipality, the commissioner shall submit to its governing body a final layout and project report covering the purpose, route location, and proposed design of the highway. The final layout must be submitted as part of a report containing any supporting data that the commissioner deems helpful to the governing body in reviewing the final layout submitted. The supporting data must include a good-faith cost estimate of all the costs in which the governing body is expected to participate. The final layout must be submitted before final decisions are reached so that meaningful early input can be obtained from the municipality. Subd. 2.Governing body action. (a) Within 15 days of receiving a final layout from the commissioner, the governing body shall schedule a public hearing on the final layout. The governing body shall, within 60 days of receiving a final layout from the commissioner, conduct a public hearing at which the Department of Transportation shall present the final layout for the project. The governing body shall give at least 30 days' notice of the public hearing. (b) Within 90 days from the date of the public hearing, the governing body shall approve or disapprove the final layout in writing, as follows: (1) If the governing body approves the final layout or does not disapprove the final layout in writing within 90 days, in which case the final layout is deemed to be approved, the commissioner may continue the project development. (2) If the final construction plans contain changes in access, traffic capacity, or acquisition of permanent right-of-way from the final layout approved by the governing body, the commissioner shall resubmit the portion of the final construction plans where changes were made to the governing body. The governing body must approve or disapprove the changes, in writing, within 60 days from the date the commissioner submits them. (3) If the governing body disapproves the final layout, the commissioner may make modifications requested by the municipality, decide not to proceed with the project, or refer the final layout to an appeal board. The appeal board shall consist of one member appointed by the commissioner, one member appointed by the governing body, and a third member agreed upon by both the commissioner and the governing body. If the commissioner and the governing body cannot agree upon the third member, the chief justice of the supreme court shall appoint a third member within 14 days of the request of the commissioner to appoint the third member. § Subd. 3.Appeal board. Within 30 days after referral of the final layout, the appeal board shall hold a hearing at which the commissioner and the governing body may present the case for or against approval of the final layout referred. Not later than 60 days after the hearing, the appeal board shall recommend approval, recommend approval with modifications, or recommend disapproval of the final layout, making additional recommendations consistent with state and federal requirements as it deems appropriate. It shall submit a written report containing its findings and recommendations to the commissioner and the governing body. History: 2001 c 191 s 5 161.165 COMMISSIONER ACTION; INTERSTATE HIGHWAYS. Subdivision 1.Applicability. This section applies to interstate highways. Subd. 2.Action on approved final layout. (a) If the appeal board recommends approval of the final layout or does not submit its findings and recommendations within 60 days of the hearing, in which case the final layout is deemed approved, the commissioner may prepare substantially similar final construction plans and proceed with the project. (b) If the final construction plans change access, traffic capacity, or acquisition of permanent right-of-way from the final layout approved by the appeal board, the commissioner shall submit the portion of the final construction plans that shows the changes, to the governing body for its approval or disapproval under section 161.164, subdivision 2. Subd. 3.Action on final layout approved with changes. (a) If, within 60 days, the appeal board recommends approval of the final layout with modifications, the commissioner may: (1) prepare final construction plans with the recommended modifications, notify the governing body, and proceed with the project; (2) decide not to proceed with the project; or (3) prepare final construction plans substantially similar to the final layout referred to the appeal board, and proceed with the project. The commissioner shall, before proceeding with the project, file a written report with the governing body and the appeal board stating fully the reasons for doing so. (b) If the final construction plans contain changes in access or traffic capacity or require additional acquisition of permanent right-of-way from the final layout reviewed by the appeal board or the governing body, the commissioner shall resubmit the portion of the final construction plans that shows the changes, to the governing body for its approval or disapproval under section 161.164, subdivision 2. Subd. 4.Action on disapproved final layout. (a) If, within 60 days, the appeal board recommends disapproval of the final layout, the commissioner may either: (1) decide not to proceed with the project; or (2) prepare final construction plans substantially similar to the final layout referred to the appeal board, notify the governing body and the appeal board, and proceed with the project. Before proceeding with the project, the commissioner shall file a written report with the governing body and the appeal board stating fully the reasons for doing so. (b) If the final construction plans contain changes in access or traffic capacity or require additional acquisition of permanent right-of-way from the final layout reviewed by the appeal board or the governing body, the commissioner shall resubmit the portion of the final construction plans that shows the changes, to the governing body for its approval or disapproval under section 161.164, subdivision 2. § Subd. 5.Final construction plans issued. The commissioner shall send a complete set of final construction plans to the municipality at least 45 days before the bid opening for informational purposes. History: 2001 c 191 s 6 161.166 COMMISSIONER ACTION; OTHER HIGHWAYS. Subdivision 1.Applicability. This section applies to trunk highways that are not interstate highways. Subd. 2.Action on approved final layout. If the appeal board recommends approval of the final layout or does not submit its findings or recommendations within 60 days of the hearing, in which case the final layout is deemed approved, the commissioner may prepare substantially similar final construction plans and proceed with the project. If the final construction plans change access or traffic capacity or require additional acquisition of right-of-way from the final layout approved by the appeal board, the commissioner shall submit the portion of the final construction plan that shows the changes, to the governing body for its approval or disapproval under section 161.164, subdivision 2. Subd. 3.Action on final layout approved with changes. (a) If the appeal board approves the final layout with modifications, the commissioner may: (1) prepare final construction plans including the modifications, notify the governing body, and proceed with the project; (2) decide not to proceed with the project; or (3) prepare a new final layout and resubmit it to the governing body for approval or disapproval under section 161.164, subdivision 2. (b) If the final construction plans contain changes in access or traffic capacity or require additional acquisition of permanent right-of-way from the final layout reviewed by the appeal board or the governing body, the commissioner shall resubmit the portion of the final construction plans that shows the changes, to the governing body for its approval or disapproval under section 161.164, subdivision 2. Subd. 4.Action on disapproved final layout. If the appeal board disapproves the final layout, the commissioner may: (1) decide not to proceed with the project; or (2) prepare a new final layout and submit it to the governing body for approval or disapproval under section 161.164, subdivision 2. § Subd. 5.Final construction plans issued. The commissioner shall send a complete set of final construction plans to the municipality at least 45 days before the bid opening for informational purposes. History: 2001 c 191 s 7; 2020 c 83 art 1 s 51 161.167 REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES. Members of the appeal board shall submit to the commissioner an itemized list of the expenses incurred in disposing of matters presented to them. The appeal board members shall be reimbursed for all reasonable expenses incurred by them in the performance of their duties. The commissioner shall pay these costs out of the trunk highway fund. History: 2001 c 191 s 8 FUMHUMHUMHFUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHFFFFFUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH 1 16 N S CENTERSECT O NI TNR W 2953003052953003052953003052953303355 10 153353303354040505560909510020251010 10 UMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMHFUMHUMHUMHUMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F UMH UMH UMH UMH ? UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH F F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F F F UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH ? UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH ? UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F F F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F ? UMH UMH UMH ? UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH ? UMH UMH UMHUMHUMH ? UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F F F F ?UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH ? UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH FFF UMH UMH F UMH ? UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMHUMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH ? UMH UMH F UMH UMH UMH UMH ? UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F FF ? UMHUMH UMH UMH ? ? UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMHUMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMHUMHUMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMHUMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMHUMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMHUMH UMHUMH UMH UMHUMHUMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMHUMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMHUMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMHUMH UMH UMHUMH UMHUMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMHUMHUMH UMH F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH F F F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMHUMHUMH F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH F UMH UMHUMH UMH F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMHUMHUMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH ?? UMH ? UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH ? UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMHUMH UMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMH ?? UMHUMH UMH FF UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMHUMH UMHUMH UMH UMHUMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F UMH UMHUMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMHUMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F UMH ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? UMH UMHUMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F F F F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH ? ? UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH ? F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH FFF UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH FF UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMHUMH UMH UMH F F UMH UMH FF FFF F FF FF F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH FFF UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH ? UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH FFF UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH ? UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F FF F ? F F F UMH ? UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH ? ? ? ? UMH ? ? UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH ? UMH ? UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F UMH UMH UMHUMH UMHUMH F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F F ? UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH ? UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH ? UMH F UMH ? UMH UMH UMHUMHUMHUMHUMH STOCK PILE STOCK PILE STOCK PILE STOCK PILE STOCK PILE STOCK PILE STOCK PILE STOCK PILE STOCK PILE CONSTRUCTION UNDER AREA CONSTRUCTION UNDER AREA CONSTRUCTION UNDER AREA CONSTRUCTION UNDER AREA CONSTRUCTION UNDER AREA M M M M M M EMERSON AVE.MIDWEST RAINBOW ROOFING LES JONES STUART CO IRVING AVE.8 0 TH 1/2 ST.ASSN.MULTI HOUSINGMINNESOTABLOOMINGTONINFINITI OFBLOOMINGTON SATURN OF REALITYBUY SELFOPTICALLYNDALEAPARTMENTSSOUTHTOWN82ND ST. 81ST. ST. COUNTY HENNEPIN FREMONT AVE.JAMES AVE.1301 1331 LIMOUSINE BLACK TIE TNI ETATSRE 35W AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FT AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FTTNN TRR21 21 8 9 1716 11 116 W WTNN TRR 24 6 16 27 W WTNN TRR24 24 6 5 3132 28 27 W WTNN TRR24 24 5 4 3233 28 27 W WTNN TRR24 24 4 3 3334 28 27 W WTNN TRR24 9 31 28 W W1 16 N S 1 16 N S 1 16 N S 1 16 N S 1 16 N S 1 16 N S 1 16 N S 1 16 N S 1 16 N S 1 16 N S 1 16 N S 1 16 N S 1 16 N S 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 16W E 1 16W E 1 16W E 1 16W E 1 16W E 1 16W E 1 16W E 1 16W E 1 16W E 1 16W E 1 16W E 1 16W E 1 16W E 1 16W E 1 16W E 1 16W E 1 16W E 1 16W E 1 16W E 1 16W E 1 16W E 1 4 1 4 1 4 ECT ONI W310315320325330335340310315320325330335340310145 150 155 145 150 15533534010120 125 130 135 140120 125 130 135 1400510101505105 10 100 5 1005 05105 0 1510 15 20 25 30 3510152025300 305315 310250255260265250255260265100 105 115 110 25 30 215 20041540025526026527027536036537037530 35 40 4550 150 100 105 110300 30 5350250200450400405 410 60 65 1015 1015202530354010 15 20 25 30 3520 25 10152025535 540 545 550 555 560 565 570 575 580 585 595 600 605 610 615 620 750 755 420 425 430 435 440 445 450 455 460 465 470 475 480 485 490 495 500 505 510 515 520 525 530 535 540 545 550 555 560 565 570 575 580 585 590 595 600 605 610 615 620 625 630205300 305 310 315600 6055005 0 5 510800805 810700705710 400405 410 100 105 110115200205210 100 105 110 500505300 305 400405 410 100 105 10 152025 303540 20 25304045 202530 300 305 95 100 400 405 10 15 2025 30 35 300 305 310 315200205 210 420 425 430 435 440 445 450 455 460 465 470 475 480 485 490 495 500 505 510 515 520 525 530 535 540 545 550 555 560 565 570 575 580 585 590 595 600 605 610 615 620 625 630 420 425 430 435 440 445 450 455 460 465 470 475 480 485 490 495 500 505 510 515 520 525 530 535 540 545 550 555 560 565 570 575 580 585 590 595 600 605 610 615 620 625 630 10 70 75 80 85 9095 1 0 0 20 25 30 35 6530354045 50 55 60 65 70 75 200205210 215 220 225 230 235 240 300 14100105 110 115 120 125 600 605 610 615 200205 210 500 505 510 515 520 100 105110115 600605200205 210 215 CLOVER DR.DUPONT AVEEMERSON AVE.DUPONT AVE.COLFAX AVE.BRYANT AVE.ALDRICH AVE.76TH ST. 77TH ST. AUTHORITY SPORTS KITCHEN MEXICAN DON PABLO'S BABIES R US BRIDAL DAVID'S BORDERS MARKET BOSTON REIMERCURY LINCOLN BLOOMINGTON FURNITURE HOM GALAXY GOLF COLUMBUS OF KNIGHTS BUY BEST LYNDALE AVE.LYNDALE AVE.EXTENDED STAY MIDWEST RAINBOW ROOFING LES JONES AUTO BODY LEGEND STUART CO ABRA AUTO BODY MASTER COLLISION ROGERS RICHFIELD LIQUOR AMERICAN BLVD. AMERICAN BLVD. HUMBOLT AVE.FREMONT AVE.GIRARD AVE. 76TH ST. 76TH ST.KNOX AVE.KNOX AVE.KNOX AVE.75TH ST. 75TH ST.GIRARD AVE.76TH ST. 77TH ST.THOMAS AVE.UPTON AVE.79TH ST.VINCENT AVE.78TH ST. 78TH ST. AMERICAN BLVD.SHERIDAN AVE.EDINBOROUGH WAYSOUTHTOWN DR.QUEEN AVE.BLOOMINGTON SATURN OF SOUTHTOWN SOUTHTOWN KOHL'S APPLEBEE'S GOODS SPORTING DICK'S BUY BEST BUSINESS SCHOOL OF MINNESOTA RENTAL BUDGET MOTORWERKS BMW LUCKY 13 CHEVROLET LUPIENT GN MANUFACTURING COLLISION MASTER ROGER'S GMAC RFC XERXES AVE.PENN AVE.PENN AVE.FRANCE AVE.YORK AVE.FRANCE AVE.AMERICAN BLVD.AMERI CAN BLVD. APARTMENTS FOUNTAINHEAD T.J. MAXX MCDONALD'S RED LOBSTERSONIC MARKET FARMERS RED ROBIN CPR WENDY'S PARTY CITY LUBE JIFFY DIAMONDS WEDDING DAY EXPRESS PANDA VERIZON STARBUCKS TCF BANK CHICK-FIL-A WALGREENS CARIBOU CVS TARGET HOBBY LOBBY DODGE RAM CHRYSLER JEEP OSAKA COWBOY JACKS RESOURCE NETWORK PROFESSIONAL RESOURCE HOMECARE EMBASSY SUITES XERXES SLUMBERLAND CONCIERGE APARTMENTS FOR CHILDREN ESPECIALLY RESIDENCE INN CIAO BELLA ECAPTIAL ADVISORS WELLS FARGO PLLC DROEL AVTEX SFM MUTUAL TEST CENTER PROMETRIC FIDER KELLY BANK BRIDGEWATER OFFICENTER FRANCE HILTON DENNY'S AMERICINN JOE SENSER'S TOYOTA WALSER JOSTENS FUDDRUCKERS GODFATHER'S MOBIL PERKINS TOTAL WINE TRADER JOE'S STAPLES MARSHALLS MICHAELS ACADEMY NEW HORIZON BARR ENGINEERING HOLIDAY INN IKE'S APOGEE RETAINING KEYSTONE JL INDUSTRIES HIAWATHA MANUFACTURING VENTURE BANK INN GUESTHOUSE OFFICE HOLIDAY HOME WALSER BUICK OLIVE GARDEN MERCEDES-BENZ SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES DESIGN NEW WAVE CLOSESTS CALIFORNIA LTC WHEELCHAIRS EDITIONS ERIN TAYLOR DAYS INN PSI SOUTHGATE EL LORO ARTISAN RUGS CYRUS APARTMENTS LUXEMBOURG LA QUINTA INN SUITES STAYBRIDGE HILTON GARDEN INN HAMPTON INN RED LOBSTER CROWNE PLAZA BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS PERSON VUE APARTMENTS COVINGTON CREDIT UNION TOPLINE FEDERAL CHILI'S LELA SHERATON DOUBLETREE CRESCENT KITCHEN SCHOOL LIFETOUCH NATIONAL NORTHLAND GROUP DORAN KATAPULT BRAINIER FINGERPRINT CENTER DYSON SERVICE GENESSEE DA VINCI CUSTOMCARE ART STUDIO DREW BENSON CURRY SALES GARY ADKINS ADMIN SOCIAL SECURITY EXPRESS SCRIPTS D SOURCE DISTRIBUTING TWIN CITY FIREPLACE DNR SALES TRUE LACROSSE MN BERNATELLO'S P&L AUTOMOTIVE EDINA SERVICE CENTER CITY SPRINT RENT411 INTERNATIONAL CROSSWAYS 2800281477382908 29142920 2808 77457744 3000 30187745 W 81ST ST MINNESOTA DRW 77T H ST W 78TH STJOHNSON AVE SW 78TH ST MARKETPOINTE DR W 80TH ST CIROXBOROUGH AVE SCOMPUTER AVENOR MANDALE BLVD VIKING DR AMERICAN BLVD WNORMANDALE LAKE BLVD GREEN VALLEY DR NORMAN CR E E K T RAI L PICTURE DRNORMANDALE BLVDGLENROY RDEAST BUSH LAKE RDW 78TH ST CECILIA CIRAMERICAN BLVDW 78TH ST EAST BUSH LAKE RDROCK BETHEL'S UNIVERSAL HOSPITAL SOLUTIONS BRANDSPRING VERISK RETAIL GLASGOW DRLOCHMERE TERRACETNI ETATSRE944 TNI ETATSRE 94 4 DESIGNSPEED60POSTEDSPEED60DESIGNSPEED60POSTEDSPEED60DESIGNSPEED60POSTEDSPEED60DESIGNSPEED60POSTEDSPEED60DESIGNSPEED60POSTEDSPEED60DESIGNSPEED60POSTEDSPEED60COUNTY HENNEPIN TNI ETATSRE 35W AMERICAN BLVD. COUNTY HENNEPIN HENNEP IN 2 8 HENNEPIN 34 HENNEPIN 17 HENNEPIN 31 HENNEPIN 32 NORMANDALE BLVD.PACIFIC RAIL ROADDESIGNSPEED55POSTEDSPEED55DESIGN SPEED 55 POSTED SPEED 55 AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FTAREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' TNI ETATSRE 35W AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' SERVICE RD NORMANDALE AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FT AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FT AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'OC NUTY OC NUTY OCNUTY OC NUTY OC NUTY CLOSE AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AMER ICAN BLVD .AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' BLOOMINGTON of City RICHFIELD of City EDINA of City RICHFIELD of City BLOOMINGTON of City AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' CLOSE CLOSE CLOSE CLOSE CLOSE CLOSE INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY OPEN ACCESS CITY CAFENICK'S WRAPBORDER PROTECTIONUS CUSTOMS ANDKINDERPLATZTHE HARTFORD HOLIDAY INN HYUNDAI LUTHER BLOOMINGTON LUTHER COLLISION & GLASS CONCIERGE APARTMENTS PURE HOCKEY BLACK & VEATCH AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FT NEW BRAIDED ACCESS RAMP TO 494 RAMP FROM 494 NEW BRAIDED ACCESS RAMP FROM 494 NEW BRAIDED ACCESS RAMP TO 494 NEW BRAIDED ACCESS 0.6 Bryant 0.6 0.32.02.51.3 0.2 0.2Hyland Lake HYLAND LAKE PARK RESERVE 2.2 0.22.6 Penn Lake 4.4Oxboro Lake 2.5 Lake Meadow2.01.6 Long 1.0 Wood Lake1.71.1FORT SNELLING NATIONAL CEMETERY 2.5MINNEAPOLIS- ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 0.20.10.30.10.9 RICHFIELD POP. Rich-field Lake 1.2 1.1 Grass Lake 0.6 Mother L. 2.3 Lake Harriet 5.2Lake Hiawatha Lake Edina L. L. wheadArro Indianhead 2.5 1.9Lake Cornelia 1.7 EDINA Harvey Lake2.0Mirror Lake 2.1Meadowbrook Lake 1.5 Lone Lake Shady OakLake 1.6 T T R 22 W R 21 W R 24 WRIVER MINNESOTA RIVERTo Jct. T.H. 13BURNSVILLE T 27 NTo J ct. T.H. 1 3 EAGAN D A K O T A T 28 NRailInc.Sys.NOKOMIS- HIAWATHA PARK FORT SNELLING STATE PIPE LI NE CO. BLOOMINGTON Lake 24"20"16"NGN. N. G. CO.16"DiamondNG NG16"N. N. G. CO.16"NG31 29 25 REGIONAL LAKES REGIONAL PARK Western 1.1ANDERSON LAKE PARK RESERVE BRYANT LAKE REGIONAL PARK L. 1 11 13 23 25 27 35 1 35 17 21 7 9 11 13 7 15 17 19 29 31 33 21 23 29 27 29 33 35 29 31 33 5 7 9 31 19 13 15 17 21 23 25 35 W.ST. E. W.CanadianPacificRailLake Snelling To Lakeville0.4To Prior LakeAnderson Lake 2.1SL 61 62 494 169 28 34 17 32 32 1 52 35 5 1 494 52 35 5 62 121 35W 62 31 17 22 21 21 100 62 53 100 169 61 93°15' 44°50' 25' 77 5 6 7A 12B 34A 4B 5 6B 11 12 13 10 17 494 34 52 46 48 152 32 31 39 53 2C 1 494 77 2A 35W 35W 158 158 169 28 1 39 212 212 46 Lake Nokomis Progressive WOLD-CHAMBERLAIN FIELD L.R.T.L. R.T. 1 PKWY.BLAKEVERNON VE.A 61 61 76TH MINNESOTA VALLEY POP. 47,941 35,228 POP. 82,893 MINNESOTA VALLEY NWR MINNESOTA VALLEY NWR PARK HISTORICAL Bush Lake 190.8SAVAGE 5 169 NWR AVE.S.28THAVE.AVE.CEDARMINNEHAHA ST.46TH E.S.ST.LYNDALE50THS.W.AVE.S.BLVD.INTERLACHEN BLVD.BAKERRD.W. 58TH ST.AVE.XERXESW.54TH ST.S.DIAMOND S.LK.RD.S.E.60TH ST. E.34TH54TH POS TRD.AVE.34THRD.SHAKOPEE12THPORTLAND90TH ST.AVE.AVE.AVE.AVE.ST.AVE.80TH 84TH ST. ST.PENN82ND LYNDALENICOLLETE. O LD ST.70TH W. W. ST.90TH W. W. R D.VIEW VALLEY RD. LAKE ANDERSON ST. SHAKOPEE W.106TH OLD NORMANDALEDR.PKWY.BLVD.98TH FRANCEW. ST.RD.94TH ST. MINNE HAHA REGIO NAL PARK UMHUMHMINNESOTA 100 14I-494: HWY 169 TO AIRPORT - PROJECT 1 9/24/2021 The alignment andgrades shown onthis map are tentativeand subject to changewithout notice.Staff Approval The traffic volumes shown areByFROM S.P.T.H.JOBPPMS ActivityLAYOUT No.VICINITY OF Prepared20Scale: Hor. 1 inch =ft.Date:estimated for year20___Prepared _____________DESIGN FILE:DATE:Copy To:For:LAYOUT HISTORYTO100Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.T.H.4944942119LakeoftheWoods Upper Lower Red Red Lake Lake LeechLake Lake Winnibigoshish LAKE SUPERIOR Mille Lacs Lake ROSEAUKITTSON LAKE OF THE WOODS MARSHALL NOBLES JACKSON MARTIN MURRAY BROWN REDWOODLYON LINCOLNROCK FARIBAULT MOWER OLMSTED WABASHA DODGESTEELEWASECANICOLLET RICE GOODHUE FILLMORE HOUSTON WINONA SIBLEY SCOTT DAKOTA McLEODCARVER WASHINGTONCHISAGOISANTI WRIGHTMEEKER RENVILLEKANDIYOHICHIPPEWA SWIFT LAC QUI PARLE BIG STONE POPE STEARNSTRAVERSEGRANTDOUGLAS TODD MORRISONWADENAOTTER TAIL WILKINBENTON KANABECPINEMILLE LACS AITKIN CARLTON ST. LOUIS LAKE COOK ITASCA KOOCHICHING BELTRAMI CLEARWATERNORMAN POLK RED LAKE PENNINGTON CLAY BECKER HUBBARDCASS SHERBURNE RAMSEYANOKA WING CROW STONE PIPE- WOOD COTTON-EARTH BLUE MEDICINE YELLOW SUEUR LE WAN WATON- BORN FREE- HENNEPIN STEVENS MEN MAHNO- COUNTY HENNEPIN LOCATION: COUNTY HENNEPIN COUNTY HENNEPIN C.S.A.H. 28 (E. BUSH LAKE RD.)2040April 16Technical Memorandum".Build Alternatives Traffic ForecastFrom: "I-494:Airport to Highway 169BLOOMINGTON, RICHFIELDAND EDINA 100 SCALE IN FEET PART 1OF 212TH AVE2785-424Purpose and Need:1A 100 SCALE IN FEET 100 SCALE IN FEET STAFFDATE:Metro District Preliminary Design EngineerReviewed ByReviewed ByProgrammed Letting Date APRIL 2023Level 1 LAYOUT APPROVAL2020202020Reviewed ByApproved ByApproved ByState Design EngineerState Geometrics EngineerReviewed By2020Metro District EngineerMetro District Traffic EngineerMetro District Maintenance Operations EngineerAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS LAYOUT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION NAME:LIC. NO.S:\KO\M\Mntmd\145574\4\43\Project_1\Project 1_LayoutAPPROVALAUGUSTT9Y012 6233- August 2021 - All comments addressed and Layout 1A submitted for Approval 8-18-2021. Guide. - Update the fully reconstructed ramp sections to follow the soon to be released Facility Design- Provide a 0.5% landing where practical.- Update entrance ramps to be metered.- Update the EB lane configuration from 35W to Lyndale to improve lane continuity.- Raise the profile of 494 under Penn to help with existing drainage issues.- Increase the 2' & 4' shoulders to 8' where possible to help with drainage and maintenance.- July 2021 - Comments were recieved from all functional groups and included the following:- June 2021 - 494 Project 1 Layout 1 submitted to MnDOT Metro LAC and GDSU for review 6-23-2021- June 2021 - $60 million was awarded to Project 1 via an INFRA grant Traffic/Geometrics/Project partnersgeometric refinements have happened from meetings and comments we have gotten from Since October the project team has defined a Project 1 based on needs and funds available. Many- October 2020 - 494 Vision Layout submitted to MnDOT Metro LAC and GDSU for OTS review 10-30-2020.I-494 over 35W bridges. Interchange. MnDOT Metro District committed to finding $10 million to $15 million to replace thefunding that provides $134 million to MnPASS on 494 and $70 million to Phase 1 of the TurbineCurrent funding available for construction of part of the vision is the Corridors of Commerce (COC)and address bridge and pavement conditions on I-494 between US 169 and TH 5.I-494 corridor; enhance safety and mobility for people walking, biking, driving, and using transit;The purpose of the I-494 Project is to improve travel and travel time reliability across the 100 SCALE IN FEET PROPOSED RAISED MEDIAN, CURB PROPOSED SHOULDER PROPOSED MEDIAN BARRIER PROPOSED WALKS, TRAILS EXISTING ROW PROPOSED RETAINING WALL PROPOSED GUARDRAIL PROPOSED NOISE WALL PROPOSED ROW CLOSE ROADWAY ACCESS CLOSED EXISTING SIGNAL SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION LIMITS PROPOSED BRIDGE PROPOSED ROADWAY REHAB/REPLACEMENT PROPOSED PAVEMENT ROADWAY REMOVAL PROPOSED SIGNAL SYSTEM PROPOSED BASIN POND PROPOSED INFILTRATION BASIN EXISTING WETLANDS LEGEND CONSTRUCTION BY OTHERS PERMANENT EASEMENT MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY PARCEL BOUNDARY CONSTRUCTION OUTSIDE ROW IMPACTED PARCELS PROPOSED RAISED MEDIAN, CURB PROPOSED SHOULDER PROPOSED MEDIAN BARRIER PROPOSED WALKS, TRAILS EXISTING ROW PROPOSED RETAINING WALL PROPOSED GUARDRAIL PROPOSED NOISE WALL PROPOSED ROW CLOSE ROADWAY ACCESS CLOSED EXISTING SIGNAL SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION LIMITS PROPOSED BRIDGE PROPOSED ROADWAY REHAB/REPLACEMENT PROPOSED PAVEMENT ROADWAY REMOVAL PROPOSED SIGNAL SYSTEM PROPOSED BASIN POND PROPOSED INFILTRATION BASIN EXISTING WETLANDS LEGEND CONSTRUCTION BY OTHERS PERMANENT EASEMENT MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY PARCEL BOUNDARY CONSTRUCTION OUTSIDE ROW IMPACTED PARCELS PROPOSED RAISED MEDIAN, CURB PROPOSED SHOULDER PROPOSED MEDIAN BARRIER PROPOSED WALKS, TRAILS EXISTING ROW PROPOSED RETAINING WALL PROPOSED GUARDRAIL PROPOSED NOISE WALL PROPOSED ROW CLOSE ROADWAY ACCESS CLOSED EXISTING SIGNAL SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION LIMITS PROPOSED BRIDGE PROPOSED ROADWAY REHAB/REPLACEMENT PROPOSED PAVEMENT ROADWAY REMOVAL PROPOSED SIGNAL SYSTEM PROPOSED BASIN POND PROPOSED INFILTRATION BASIN EXISTING WETLANDS LEGEND CONSTRUCTION BY OTHERS PERMANENT EASEMENT MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY PARCEL BOUNDARY CONSTRUCTION OUTSIDE ROW IMPACTED PARCELS PROJECT LOCATION MATCHLINE - SEE LAYOUT PART 2MATCHLINE - SEE INSET A MATCHLINEINSET A INSET B MATCHLINE MATCHLINE - SEE INSET B 100 SCALE IN FEET QUEEN AVE.HOME2 SUITES82ND ST.PENN AVE. AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FT AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FT AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FT AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' F F F F STOCK PILE STOCK PILE STOCK PILE STOCK PILE STOCK PILE STOCK PILE UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMHUMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ?? ? ? ?? ?? ? ? UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH ? UMH UMH UMH ? UMHUMHUMHUMH UMHUMHUMHUMH ???? UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH ? UMH UMHUMH F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMHUMH F UMH UMH F F F F F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMHUMHUMHUMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F F F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F F FF UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F UMH UMH UMH UMH F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F UMH F UMHF UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMHUMHUMH UMHUMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMH UMHUMHUMH UMHUMHUMH UMH UMHUMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F F UMHUMHUMH UMHUMHUMH F F F F UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH F UMH UMH UMH F F F UMHUMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH F UMH UMH F UMH UMH UMH UMHUMHUMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMHUMHUMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMHUMH UMHUMHUMHUMH UMHUMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH F UMH UMH ?? UMH UMH UMH UMH ? ? UMH UMHUMH UMHUMHUMHUMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMHUMH UMH UMHUMHUMH UMHUMHUMHUMHUMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMHUMHUMH UMH UMHUMHUMH UMH UMH UMHUMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMHUMH UMHUMHUMH UMHUMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMHUMHUMH UMHUMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMHUMH UMHUMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH ? UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F UMH UMHUMHUMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F UMH UMH ? UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMHUMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH F F F F UMH UMH UMH UMH ? ? ? ? ???? ? ? ? ? ? ? ???? ? ? ? ? ?? UMH STOCK PILE STOCK PILE STOCK PILE STOCK PILE STOCK PILE STOCK PILE CONSTRUCTION UNDER AREA CONSTRUCTION UNDER AREA CONSTRUCTION UNDER AREA UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH UMH R C R C R C 1 16 N S 1 16 N S 1 16 N S 1 16 N S 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 16W E1 16W E1 16W E1 16W E1 16W E 1 16W E1 16W E1 16W E1 16W E1 16W E 1 16W E TNN T R R24 24 2 1 35 36 2827 W WTNN T R R24 24 3 2 34 35 2827 W W25025035 60 06053035405 410760 765 645 635 640 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 690 695 700 705 710 715 720 725 730 735 740 205 404550552025303540635 640 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 690 695 700 705 710 715 720 725 730 735 740 635 640 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 690 695 700 705 710 715 720 725 730 735 740 20253035404550556065707530 35 10 15 20 20 25 30 40 45 10 15 20 25 30 35 20 25 30 3020 25 30 60 65 70 110115 120 70 75 75 80 80 85 90 95 100 10580 85 90 95 60 3035 40 LYNDALE AVE.GOODWILL RICHFIELD LIQUOR TNI ETATSRE 944 TNI ETATSRE 944 AMERICAN BLVD.AMERICAN BLVD. 77TH ST.STEVENS AVE.2ND AVE.3RD AVE.4TH AVE.CHICAGO AVE.PILLSBURY AVEHARRIET AVE.12TH AVE.12TH AVE.11TH AVE.10TH AVE.ELLIOT AVE.NICOLLET AVE.OLD CEDAR AVE S5TH AVE S4TH AVE SAMERICAN BLVD E 77TH ST 14TH AVE13TH AVEBLOOMINGTON AVEPAYLESS CAR RENTAL IKEA MINNESOTA GREAT WOLF LODGE SERVICE INTERNAL REVENUE HILTON GARDEN INN GARDEN GRILLE & BAR HIRED MANAGEMENT BON APPETIT FIRSTSERVICE RESIDENTIAL WORKS COMPUTING ALLINA HEALTH CLINIC COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT RESIDENCE INN COMFORT INN AIRORT OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE& SUITES NORTHWOOD INN METRO SALES INC PLANET FRIENDLY ECOSMARTE CANVAS HEALTH SCHOOL ADLER GRADUATE RICOH AUDI APARTMENTS COMMUNITY COURT RICHLAND COURT INN & SUITES BAYMOUNT EXPRESS SUPERAMERICA SEASONS PARK LOFFLER PRO SKIN CHURCH EVANGELICAL FREE METRO SALES & CO WILLIAM L GRIFFIN CES VERITIV EXPRESS EMBROIDERY LINDSTROM CED JK CABINETS PLUS REFRIGERATION SOLID EMBROIDERY VENEL MARILU PRODUCTS CAPP INDUSTRIES AIR SPECIALITIES ALIANCE NYQUIST FANTASTIC CARSOUP.COM TOWERS RICHFIELD APARTMENTS BUENA VISTA APARTMENTS CORINTHIAN AUTO SALES UNIVERSITY KHAN'S RESOURCES PERSONNEL & SUITES QUALITY INN DENNY'S & SUITES MICROTEL INN PET LODGE LUCKY DOG WORLDWIDE PREMIER TRANS. FIDELITY JONES ELDER VALLEY PROGRESS ADVOCACY CORNERSTONE THEATRES MANN PRODUCTS LEE INTEGRATORS ECSI SYSTEM AVVR ELECTRICITY BLOOMINGTON APARTMENTS SOUTH POINTE WALMART WALGREENS FREIGHT TOOLS HARBOR NAIL TODAY LIQUORS OTTO'S SUBWAY TOTALLY KIDS PIZZA HUT INDIA CAFE KABOB'S INDIAN GRILL CHURCH BRAZILIAN CHURCH METHODIST DOMINO'S PIZZA 1ST WOK & ASSOCIATES WILLIAMS BAKERY DENNY'S LOGISTICS RADIANT BUILDERS PLEKKENPOL BATTERY CENTER INTERSTATE ALL SUPPLY MARS DEPOT RATTAN TOOL DELEGARD GRAINGER LEARNING CENTER BRIGHT STARS SUPER 8 INN LA QUINTA ALIGNMENT RICHFIELD WHEEL BODY BON AUTO ARBY'S PLUMBING BLAYLOCK RBCU APARTMENTS BUENA VISTA CHURCH OF THE ASSUMPTION HERTZ ACADEMY PARTNERSHIP BELL TACO MENARDS TAQUERIA ANDALE WILLIAMS SHERWIN- NEW ORLEANS COURT PAINTS VIKINGS GENERAL KENNY'S TIRES JOHNSON BIG STORAGE PUBLIC COLLISION LAMETTRY'S SUITES CANDLEWOOD MITSUBISHI BMW SERVICES PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION SAM'S CLUB CULVER'S REPAIR AUTO TECH 7/8 LIQUORS METRO PCS LEHMAN'S GARAGE STORAGE CENTRAL SELF MCDONALD'S SAM'S CLUB GAS KEY COLLISION HOME DEPOT SELF STORAGE THE LOCK UP MICRON HOLIDAY LURO BOOTS IWASH MOUNA'S HONDA CARPET ONE GARAGE ELSEN BROTHER'S CENTER A VILLA FOODS KWIK WAY CHICAGO AVE.TREE DOLLAR5TH AVE.E. 78TH ST. E. 78TH ST E. 78TH ST. HENNEPIN 52 HENNEPIN 35 PROGRESSIVE RAIL ROAD2ND AVE S4TH AVE SWENTWORTH AVE SAREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FT AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FT AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FT AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'CLOSE AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FT CLOSECLOSECLOSE CLOSE CLOSE CLOSECLOSECLOSE AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FTAREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FT AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FT AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FT AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FT AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FT AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FT AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FT AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' OC NUTY OC NUTY AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FT AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FT AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FT AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FT AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FT AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AMERICAN BLVD. AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'PORTLAND AVE.JIMMY JOHNS AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FT COUNTY HENNEPIN CLOSE POSTEDSPEED60DESIGNSPEED60POSTEDSPEED60DESIGNSPEED60CLOSE CLOSECLOSEAREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FT APARTMENTS SEASONS PARK APARTMENTS SEASONS PARK CEMETERY ASSUMPTION CHURCH RichfieldofCity BLOOMINGTONof City OF AMERICA WATER PARK ROOSEVELT PARK SPEEDWAY 3RD AVE S77TH ST. 76TH ST. SUPER CASH CRICKET AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' ACCESS FROM 494 REMOVED 494 REMOVED ACCESS FROM ACCESS FROM 494 REMOVED ACCESS TO 494 REMOVED ACCESS TO 494 REMOVED ACCESS TO 494 REMOVED PROPOSED RAISED MEDIAN, CURB PROPOSED SHOULDER PROPOSED MEDIAN BARRIER PROPOSED WALKS, TRAILS EXISTING ROW PROPOSED RETAINING WALL PROPOSED GUARDRAIL PROPOSED NOISE WALL PROPOSED ROW CLOSE ROADWAY ACCESS CLOSED EXISTING SIGNAL SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION LIMITS PROPOSED BRIDGE PROPOSED ROADWAY REHAB/REPLACEMENT PROPOSED PAVEMENT ROADWAY REMOVAL PROPOSED SIGNAL SYSTEM PROPOSED BASIN POND PROPOSED INFILTRATION BASIN EXISTING WETLANDS LEGEND CONSTRUCTION BY OTHERS PERMANENT EASEMENT MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY PARCEL BOUNDARY CONSTRUCTION OUTSIDE ROW IMPACTED PARCELS PROPOSED RAISED MEDIAN, CURB PROPOSED SHOULDER PROPOSED MEDIAN BARRIER PROPOSED WALKS, TRAILS EXISTING ROW PROPOSED RETAINING WALL PROPOSED GUARDRAIL PROPOSED NOISE WALL PROPOSED ROW CLOSE ROADWAY ACCESS CLOSED EXISTING SIGNAL SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION LIMITS PROPOSED BRIDGE PROPOSED ROADWAY REHAB/REPLACEMENT PROPOSED PAVEMENT ROADWAY REMOVAL PROPOSED SIGNAL SYSTEM PROPOSED BASIN POND PROPOSED INFILTRATION BASIN EXISTING WETLANDS LEGEND CONSTRUCTION BY OTHERS PERMANENT EASEMENT MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY PARCEL BOUNDARY CONSTRUCTION OUTSIDE ROW IMPACTED PARCELS I-494: HWY 169 TO AIRPORT - PROJECT 1 9/24/2021 The alignment andgrades shown onthis map are tentativeand subject to changewithout notice.Staff Approval The traffic volumes shown areByFROM S.P.T.H.JOBPPMS ActivityLAYOUT No.VICINITY OF Prepared20Scale: Hor. 1 inch =ft.Date:estimated for year20___Prepared _____________DESIGN FILE:DATE:Copy To:For:TO100Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.T.H.4944942119LakeoftheWoods Upper Lower Red Red Lake Lake Leech Lake Lake Winnibigoshish LAKE SUPERIOR Mille Lacs Lake ROSEAUKITTSON LAKE OF THE WOODS MARSHALL NOBLES JACKSON MARTIN MURRAY BROWN REDWOODLYON LINCOLNROCK FARIBAULT MOWER OLMSTED WABASHA DODGESTEELEWASECANICOLLET RICE GOODHUE FILLMORE HOUSTON WINONA SIBLEY SCOTT DAKOTA McLEODCARVER WASHINGTONCHISAGOISANTI WRIGHTMEEKER RENVILLEKANDIYOHICHIPPEWA SWIFT LAC QUI PARLE BIG STONE POPE STEARNSTRAVERSEGRANTDOUGLAS TODD MORRISONWADENAOTTER TAIL WILKINBENTON KANABECPINEMILLE LACS AITKIN CARLTON ST. LOUIS LAKE COOK ITASCA KOOCHICHING BELTRAMI CLEARWATERNORMAN POLK RED LAKE PENNINGTON CLAY BECKER HUBBARDCASS SHERBURNE RAMSEYANOKA WING CROW STONE PIPE- WOOD COTTON-EARTH BLUE MEDICINE YELLOW SUEUR LE WAN WATON- BORN FREE- HENNEPIN STEVENS MEN MAHNO- COUNTY HENNEPIN LOCATION:C.S.A.H. 28 (E. BUSH LAKE RD.)2040April 16Technical Memorandum".Build Alternatives Traffic ForecastFrom: "I-494:Airport to Highway 169BLOOMINGTON, RICHFIELDAND EDINA 100 SCALE IN FEET PART 2OF 22785-42412TH AVE1A 100 SCALE IN FEET STAFFS:\KO\M\Mntmd\145574\4\43\Project_1\Project 1_LayoutAUGUSTAPPROVALT9Y012 6233MINNESOTA 77 MINNESOTA 77 MATCHLINE - SEE LAYOUT PART 1 Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.J. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Derik Otten, Facility Manager Item Activity: Subject:Approve Master Agreement for Design Services with HGA Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Master Agreement for Professional Design and Engineering Services with HGA. INTRODUCTION: This master agreement will allow the city to enter into contracts with HGA for design and engineering services as they relate to city buildings. Services would include space use and needs studies, energy and asset assessments, and renovations and/or additions to existing buildings and new construction of city owned facilities and properties. Individual project approval will be sought from council per the city purchasing policy. Similar agreements are in place with peer architectural and engineering firms. ATTACHMENTS: Description Master Agreement for Design Services-HGA Doc. #170480v.1 RNK: 5/23/2013 1 MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL DESIGN & ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT made between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter called the "OWNER", and HGA., hereinafter called the "DESIGNER". OWNER intends to secure professional DESIGN & ENGINEERING services, according to the terms of this Agreement. 1. SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT OWNER intends to secure professional consulting architectural, engineering, planning and/or land survey services on an ongoing basis for general City services and multiple projects, according to the terms of this agreement. OWNER and DESIGNER shall enter into project specific supplemental agreements. This Master Agreement shall be deemed incorporated into the Supplemental Agreements unless a Supplemental Agreement specifically provides that it is not incorporated. If there is a conflict between the terms of the Supplemental Agreement and the Master Agreement, the terms of the Master Agreement shall control unless the Supplemental Agreement specifically provides that despite the conflict the terms of the Supplemental Agreement apply. 2. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SERVICES OF DESIGNER 2.1 STUDY AND REPORT PHASE / FEASIBILITY REPORT 2.1.1. Consult with OWNER to clarify and define OWNER'S requirements for the Project, review available data and attend necessary meetings and be available for general consultation. 2.1.2. Advise OWNER as to the necessity of OWNER'S providing or obtaining from others data or services of the types described in paragraph 4, and assist OWNER in obtaining such data and services. 2.1.3. Identify and analyze requirements of governmental authorities having jurisdiction to approve the design of the Project and participate in consultations with such authorities. 2.1.4. Provide analyses of OWNER'S needs, planning surveys, site evaluations and comparative studies of prospective sites and solutions. 2.1.5. Provide a general economic analysis of OWNER'S requirements applicable to various alternatives. 2.1.6. The DESIGNER shall conduct and prepare preliminary studies, layouts, sketches, preliminary field work, preliminary cost estimates, estimates of assessment rates, and shall assist the OWNER in obtaining required subsurface investigations as required for the preparation of the Feasibility Reports. The Feasibility Reports shall conform to the requirements of Minn. Stat. Doc. #170480v.1 RNK: 5/23/2013 2 Chapter 429 if the cost of the project may be assessed in whole or part. The report shall contain schematic layouts, sketches and conceptual design criteria with appropriate exhibits to indicate clearly the considerations involved (including applicable requirements of governmental authorities having jurisdiction as aforesaid) and the alternative solutions available to OWNER and setting forth DESIGNER findings and recommendations. This Report will be accompanied by DESIGNER opinion of probable costs for the Project, including the following which will be separately itemized: construction cost and indirect cost consisting of design and engineering costs and contingencies with per year escalation projections, and (on the basis of information furnished by OWNER) allowances for such other items as charges of all other professionals and consultants, for the cost of land and rights-of-way, for compensation for or damages to properties, for interest and financing charges and for other services to be provided by others for OWNER. The total of all construction and indirect costs are hereinafter called "Total Project Costs". 2.1.7. Furnish five (5) printed copies of the Study and Report documents and one (1) electronic file and review them in person with OWNER. 2.1.8. The DESIGNER shall assist with presenting the Feasibility Reports to the proper reviewing agencies and to the City Council. The DESIGNER shall appear at the public hearing to present the information. 2.2 PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE 2.2.1. In consultation with OWNER and on the basis of the accepted Study and Report documents, determine the general scope, extent and character of the Project and attend necessary meetings as provided in the applicable Supplemental Agreement. 2.2.2. Prepare Preliminary Design documents consisting of final design criteria, preliminary drawings, outline specifications and written descriptions of the Project. 2.2.3. Advise OWNER if additional data or services of the types described in paragraph 4.4 are necessary and assist OWNER in obtaining such data and services. 2.2.4. Based on the information contained in the Preliminary Design documents, submit a revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs. 2.2.5. Furnish preliminary legal descriptions and exhibits for all permanent and temporary easements anticipated to construct the Project. 2.2.6. Furnish three (3) copies of the above Preliminary Design documents and one (1) electronic copy and present and review them in person with OWNER 2.3 FINAL DESIGN PHASE 2.3.1. On the basis of the accepted Preliminary Design documents, the City’s design standards, and the revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs prepare for incorporation in the Bidding Documents final drawings to show the general scope, extent and character of the work to be furnished and performed by Contractor(s) (hereinafter called "Plans") and Specifications. Doc. #170480v.1 RNK: 5/23/2013 3 2.3.2. Provide technical criteria, written descriptions and design data for use in filing applications for permits with or obtaining approvals of such governmental authorities as have jurisdiction to approve the design of the Project, and assist OWNER in consultations with appropriate authorities. The DESIGNER shall submit all applications and permit support data to the appropriate agencies and submit copies to the OWNER. 2.3.3. Based on property information received from Owner in accordance with Paragraph 4.4, provide legal descriptions and exhibits for all easements, property surveys or related Designing services needed for the transfer of interests in real property and field surveys for design purposes and Designing surveys and staking to enable Contractor(s) to proceed with their work. 2.3.4. Advise OWNER of any adjustments to the latest opinion of probable Total Project Costs caused by changes in general scope, extent or character or design requirements of the Project or Construction Costs. Furnish to OWNER a revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs based on the Plans and Specifications. 2.3.5. Prepare for review and approval by OWNER, its legal counsel and other advisors contract agreement forms, general conditions and supplementary conditions, and (where appropriate) bid forms, invitations to bid and instructions to bidders, and assist in the preparation of other related documents. 2.3.6. Attend necessary hearings and meetings and be available for general consultation. 2.3.7. Furnish three (3) copies of the listed Final Design documents, including the Plans and Specifications, and present and review them in person with OWNER. 2.3.8. The DESIGNER shall furnish one copy of all design calculations when requested by OWNER. 2.4 BIDDING OR NEGOTIATING PHASE 2.4.1. The DESIGNER shall prepare and forward the Advertisement for Bids to the designated publications, official newspaper and the OWNER. The DESIGNER shall supply up to thirty (30) sets of full size final Plans and Specifications for use in obtaining bids and submitting for general review. The DESIGNER shall maintain a record of prospective bidders to whom Bidding Documents have been issued, attend pre-bid meetings and receive and process deposits for Bidding Documents. 2.4.2. Prepare Contract Documents. 2.4.3. Issue addenda as appropriate to interpret, clarify or expand the Bidding Documents. 2.4.4. Consult with and advise OWNER as to the acceptability of the prime contractor and subcontractors, suppliers, and other persons and organizations proposed by the prime contractor(s) (herein called "Contractor(s)") for the portions of the work where acceptability is required by the Bidding Documents. Doc. #170480v.1 RNK: 5/23/2013 4 2.4.5. Consult with and advise OWNER concerning and determining the acceptability of substitute materials and equipment proposed by Contractor(s) when substitution prior to the award of contracts is allowed by the Bidding Documents. 2.4.6. Attend the bid opening, prepare bid tabulation sheets and assist OWNER in evaluating bidder qualifications and recommendations on bids, and in assembling and awarding contracts for construction, materials, equipment and services. 2.5 CONSTRUCTION PHASE 2.5.1. General Administration of Construction Contract. DESIGNER shall consult with and advise OWNER and act as OWNER'S representative. All of OWNER'S instructions to Contractor(s) will be issued through DESIGNER who will have authority to act on behalf of Owner to the extent provided in the General Conditions except as otherwise provided in writing. The General Conditions shall not be modified without the written agreement of the OWNER. 2.5.2. Visits to Site and Observation of Construction. In connection with observations of the work of Contractor(s) while it is in progress: 2.5.2.1. DESIGNER shall make visits to the site at intervals appropriate to the various stages of construction as DESIGNER deems necessary in order to observe as an experienced and qualified design professional the progress and quality of the various aspects of Contractor(s) workBased on information obtained during such visits and on such observations, DESIGNER shall endeavor to determine in general if the work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents and DESIGNER shall keep OWNER informed of the progress of the work. 2.5.2.2. The Resident Project Representative (and any assistants) will be DESIGNER'S agent or employee and under DESIGNER'S supervision. 2.5.2.3. The purpose of the DESIGNER'S visits to and representation by the Resident Project Representative (and assistants, if any) at the site will be to enable DESIGNER to better carry out the duties and responsibilities assigned to and undertaken by DESIGNER during the Construction Phase, and, in addition, by exercise of DESIGNER'S efforts as an experienced and qualified design professional, to provide for OWNER a greater degree of confidence that the completed work of Contractor(s) will conform to the Contract Documents and that the integrity of the design concept as reflected in the Contract Documents has been implemented and preserved by Contractor(s). On the other hand, DESIGNER shall not, during such visits or as a result of such observations of Contractor(s)' work in progress, supervise, direct, or have control over Contractor(s)' work, nor shall DESIGNER have control or charge of and shall not be responsible for the Contractor(s)' means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction selected Doc. #170480v.1 RNK: 5/23/2013 5 by Contractor(s), for safety precautions and programs incident to the work of Contractor(s) or for any failure of Contractor(s) to comply with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes, or orders applicable to Contractor(s) furnishing and performing their work. Accordingly, DESIGNER can neither guarantee the performance of the construction contracts by Contractor(s) nor assume responsibility for Contractor(s)' failure to furnish and perform their work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 2.5.2.4. If DESIGNER observes or otherwise becomes aware of defects or deficiencies in the work, or nonconformance to the Contract Documents, DESIGNER shall promptly give written notice thereof to OWNER. 2.5.3. Defective Work. During such visits and on the basis of such observation, DESIGNER may disapprove of or reject Contractor(s) work while it is in progress if DESIGNER believes that such work will not produce a completed Project that conforms generally to the Contract Documents or that it will prejudice the integrity of the design concept of the Project as reflected in the Contract Documents. 2.5.4. Interpretations and Clarifications. DESIGNER shall issue necessary interpretations and clarifications of the Contract Documents and in connection therewith prepare work directive changes and change orders as required for OWNER'S approval. 2.5.5. Shop Drawings. DESIGNER shall review and approve (or take other appropriate action in respect of) Shop Drawings, samples and other data which Contractor(s) are required to submit, but only for conformance with the design concept of the Project and compliance with the information given in the Contract Documents. Such reviews and approvals or other action shall not extend to means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction or to safety precautions and programs incident thereto. 2.5.6. Substitutes. DESIGNER shall evaluate and determine the acceptability of substitute materials and equipment proposed by Contractor(s). 2.5.7. Inspections and Tests. DESIGNER shall have authority, as OWNER'S representative, to require special inspection or testing of the work by Contractor, and shall receive and review all certificates of inspections, testing and approvals required by laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes, orders or the Contract Documents (but only to determine generally that their content complies with the requirements of, and the results certified indicate compliance with, the Contract Documents). DESIGNER shall be entitled to rely on the results of such tests. 2.5.8. DESIGNER shall respond to all written claims submitted by Contractor in a timely fashion. DESIGNER shall not be liable for the results of any such interpretations or decisions rendered in good faith. 2.5.9. Applications for Payment. Based on DESIGNER'S on-site observations as an experienced and qualified design professional, on information provided by the Resident Project Doc. #170480v.1 RNK: 5/23/2013 6 Representative and on review of applications for payment and the accompanying data and schedules: 2.5.9.1. DESIGNER shall determine the amounts owing to Contractor(s) and recommend in writing payments to Contractor(s) in such amounts and the OWNER shall verify the amounts. Such recommendations of payment will constitute a representation to OWNER, based on such observations and review, that the work has progressed to the point indicated, and that, to the best of DESIGNER'S knowledge, information and belief, the quality of such work is generally in accordance with the Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of such work as a functioning whole prior to or upon Substantial Completion, to the results of any subsequent tests called for in the Contract Documents and to any other qualifications stated in the recommendation). In the case of unit price work, DESIGNER'S recommendations of payment will include final determinations of quantities and classifications of such work (subject to any subsequent adjustments allowed by the Contract Documents). 2.5.9.2. By recommending any payment DESIGNER will not thereby be deemed to have represented that exhaustive, continuous or detailed reviews or examinations have been made by DESIGNER to check the quality or quantity of Contractor(s)' work as it is furnished and performed beyond the responsibilities specifically assigned to DESIGNER in this Agreement and the Contract Documents. DESIGNER'S review of Contractor(s)' work for the purposes of recommending payment will not impose on DESIGNER responsibility to supervise, direct or control such work or for the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction or safety precautions or programs incident thereto or Contractor(s)' compliance with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders applicable to their furnishing and performing the work. It will also not impose on DESIGNER responsibility to make any examination to ascertain how or for what purposes any Contractor has used the money paid on account of the Contract Price, or to determine that title to any of the work, materials or equipment has passed to OWNER free and clear of any lien, claims, security interests or encumbrances, or that there may not be other matters at issue between OWNER and Contractor that might affect the amount that should be paid. 2.5.10. Contractor(s)' Completion Documents. DESIGNER shall receive and review maintenance and operating instructions, schedules, guarantees, bonds and certificates of insurance, tests and approvals which are to be assembled by Contractor(s) in accordance with the Contract Documents (but such review will only be to determine that their content complies with the requirements of, and in the case of certificates on inspection, tests and approvals the results certified indicate compliance with, the Contract Documents); and shall transmit them to OWNER with written comments. Doc. #170480v.1 RNK: 5/23/2013 7 2.5.11. Inspections. DESIGNER shall conduct an inspection to determine if the work is substantially complete and a final inspection to determine if the completed work is acceptable so that DESIGNER may recommend, in writing, final payment to Contractor(s) and give written notice to OWNER and the Contractor(s) that the work is acceptable (subject to any conditions therein expressed), but any such recommendation and notice will be subject to the limitations expressed in paragraph 2.5.5. 2.5.12. Limitation of Responsibilities. DESIGNER shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions of any Contractor, or of any subcontractor or supplier, or any of the Contractor(s)' or subcontractors' or suppliers' agents or employees of any other persons (except DESIGNER'S own employees and agents) at the site or otherwise furnishing or performing any of the Contractor(s)' work; however, nothing contained in paragraphs 2.5.1 through 2.5.12 inclusive, shall be construed to release DESIGNER from liability for failure to properly perform duties and responsibilities assumed by DESIGNER in the Contract Documents. 2.6 OPERATIONAL PHASE 2.6.1. Provide assistance in the closing of any financial or related transaction for the Project. 2.6.2. Provide assistance in connection with the refining and adjusting of any equipment or system. 2.6.3. Assist OWNER in training OWNER'S staff to operate and maintain the Project. Extensive training shall be mutually agreed upon within the Supplemental Agreement as Additional Services as defined in Section 3 of this agreement. 2.6.4. Assist OWNER in developing systems and procedures for control of the operation and maintenance of and record keeping for the Project. 2.6.5. Within ninety (90) days after completion of a Project, prepare a set of reproducible record prints of Drawings and an electronic version that satisfy the City of Edina Record Drawing requirements, attached hereto, showing those changes made during the construction process, based on the marked-up prints, drawings and other data furnished by Contractor(s) to DESIGNER and which DESIGNER considered significant. DESIGNER will not be responsible for any errors or omissions in the information provided by Contractor that is incorporated in the record drawings and record documents. Final payment will be made only after record drawings are received by the OWNER. 2.6.6. In company with OWNER, visit the Project to observe any apparent defects in the completed construction, assist OWNER in consultations and discussions with Contractor(s) concerning correction of such deficiencies, and make recommendations as to replacement or correction of defective work. 2.6.7. Assist OWNER in preparation of assessment roll for City improvement projects, and attend assessment hearings. Doc. #170480v.1 RNK: 5/23/2013 8 3. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SERVICES OF DESIGNER 3.1 SERVICES REQUIRING ADVANCE AUTHORIZATION. If authorized in writing by OWNER, DESIGNER shall furnish or obtain from others Additional Services of the types listed in paragraphs 3.1.1 through 3.1.12, inclusive. These services are not included as part of Basic Services except to the extent provided otherwise by attached Supplemental Agreement or Work Order and will be paid for by OWNER as indicated in Section 6. 3.1.1. Preparation of applications and supporting documents (in addition to those furnished under Basic Services) for private or governmental grants, loans or advances in connection with the Project; preparation or review of environmental assessments and impact statements; review and evaluation of the effect on the design requirements of the Project of any such statements and documents prepared by others; and assistance in obtaining approvals of authorities having jurisdiction over the anticipated environmental impact of the Project. 3.1.2. Field Services to make measured drawings of or to investigate existing conditions or facilities, or to verify the accuracy of drawings or other information furnished to OWNER by others, including surveys to verify location or improve accuracy of record information provided by Contractor under Paragraph 2.6.5. 3.1.3. Services resulting from significant changes in the general scope, extent or character of the Project or its design including, but not limited to, changes in size, complexity, OWNER'S schedule, character of construction or method of financing; and revising previously accepted studies, reports, design documents or Contract Documents when such revisions are required by changes in laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders enacted subsequent to the preparation of such studies, reports or documents, or are due to any other causes beyond DESIGNER'S control. 3.1.4. Providing renderings or models for OWNER'S use. 3.1.5. Preparing documents for alternate bids requested by OWNER for Contractor(s)' work which is not executed or documents for out-of-sequence work. 3.1.6. Investigations and studies involving, but not limited to, detailed consideration of operations, maintenance and overhead expenses; providing value DESIGNERing during the course of design; the preparation of feasibility studies, cash flow and economic evaluations, rate schedules and appraisals; assistance in obtaining financing for the Project; evaluating processes available for licensing; assisting OWNER in obtaining process licensing; detailed quantity surveys of material, equipment and labor; and audits or inventories required in connection with construction performed by OWNER. 3.1.7. Furnishing services of independent professional associates and consultants for other than Basic Services (which include, but are not limited to, customary civil, structural, mechanical and electrical DESIGNERing and customary architectural design incidental thereto); and providing data or services of the types described in paragraph 4.4 when OWNER employs DESIGNER to provide such data or services in lieu of furnishing the same in accordance with paragraph 4.4. Doc. #170480v.1 RNK: 5/23/2013 9 3.1.8. Services during out-of-town travel required of DESIGNER other than visits to the site or OWNER'S office. 3.1.9. Assistance in connection with bid protests, rebidding or renegotiating contracts for construction, materials, equipment or services, except when such assistance is required to complete services called for in paragraph 2.4. 3.1.10. Preparation of operating, maintenance and staffing manuals to supplement Basic Services under paragraph 2.5.10. 3.1.11. Preparing to serve or serving as a consultant or witness for OWNER in any litigation, arbitration or other legal or administrative proceeding involving the Project unless the DESIGNER is a defendant (except for assistance in consultations which is included as part of Basic Services. 3.1.12. Additional services in connection with the Project, including services which are to be furnished by OWNER in accordance with Section 4, and services not otherwise provided for in this Agreement. 3.2 SERVICES NOT REQUIRING ADVANCE AUTHORIZATION. When required by the Contract Documents in circumstances beyond DESIGNER'S control, DESIGNER shall furnish or obtain from others, as circumstances require during construction and without waiting for specific authorization from OWNER, Additional Services listed in paragraphs 3.2.1 through 3.2.5, inclusive. These services are not included as part of Basic Services except to the extent provided otherwise by attached Supplemental Agreement. DESIGNER shall advise OWNER promptly after starting any such additional services which will be paid for by OWNER. 3.2.1. Services in connection with work directive changes and change orders to reflect changes requested by OWNER if the resulting change in compensation for Basic Services is not commensurate with the additional services rendered. 3.2.2. Services in making revisions to Plans and Specifications occasioned by the acceptance of substitutions proposed by Contractor(s); and services after the award to each contract in evaluating and determining the acceptability of an unreasonable or excessive number of substitutions proposed by Contractor. 3.2.3. Services resulting from significant delays, changes or price increases occurring as a direct or indirect result of material, equipment or energy shortages. 3.2.4. Additional or extended services during construction made necessary by (1) work damaged by fire or other cause during construction, (2) a significant amount of defective or neglected work of any Contractor, (3) acceleration of the progress schedule involving services beyond normal working hours, and (4) default by any Contractor. 3.2.5. Services (other than Basic Services during the Operational Phase) in connection with any partial use of any part of the Project by OWNER prior to Substantial Completion. Doc. #170480v.1 RNK: 5/23/2013 10 4. OWNER'S PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT RESPONSIBILITIES. OWNER shall do the following: 4.1 Designate in writing a person to act as OWNER'S representative with respect to the services to be rendered under this Agreement, such person shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define OWNER'S policies and decisions with respect to DESIGNER'S services for the Project. 4.2 Provide criteria and information as to OWNER'S requirements for the Project, including design objectives and constraints, space, capacity and performance requirements, flexibility and expandability, and any budgetary limitations; and furnish copies of design and construction standards OWNER will require to be included in the Plans and Specifications. 4.3 Assist DESIGNER by placing at DESIGNER'S disposal all available information pertinent to the Project including previous reports and any other data relative to design or construction of the Project. 4.4 Furnish to DESIGNER as required for performance of DESIGNER'S Basic Services except to the extent provided otherwise by attached amendment, the following: 4.4.1. Data prepared by or services of others, including without limitation, borings, and subsurface explorations, hydrographic surveys, laboratory tests and inspections of samples, materials and equipment; 4.4.2. Appropriate professional interpretations of all the foregoing; 4.4.3. Environmental assessment and impact statements, if needed; 4.4.4. Property, boundary, easement, right-of-way, topographic and utility surveys; 4.4.5. Property descriptions; and 4.4.6. Zoning, deed and other land use restrictions; All of which DESIGNER may use and rely upon in performing services under this Agreement. 4.5 Provide DESIGNERing surveys or authorize DESIGNER to establish reference points for construction to enable Contractor(s) to proceed with the layout of the work. 4.6 Arrange for access to and make all provisions for DESIGNER to enter upon public and private property as required for DESIGNER to perform services under this Agreement. 4.7 Examine all studies, reports, sketches, Drawings, Specifications, proposals and other documents presented by DESIGNER. Obtain advice of an attorney, insurance counselor and other consultants as OWNER deems appropriate for such examination and render in writing decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay the services of DESIGNER. Doc. #170480v.1 RNK: 5/23/2013 11 4.8 Prepare applications and provide support for approvals and permits from all governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project and such approvals and consents from others as may be necessary for completion of the Project. 4.9 Provide such accounting, independent cost estimating and insurance counseling services as may be required for the Project, such legal services as OWNER may require or DESIGNER may reasonably request with regard to legal issues pertaining to the Project including any that may be raised by Contractor(s), such auditing service as OWNER may require to ascertain how or for what purpose any Contractor has used the monies paid under the construction contract, and such inspection services as OWNER may require to ascertain that Contractor(s) are complying with any law, rule, regulations, ordinance, code or order applicable to their furnishing and performing the work. 4.10 If OWNER designates a person to represent OWNER at the site who is not DESIGNER or DESIGNER'S agent or employee, the duties, responsibilities and limitations of authority of such other person and the affect thereof on the duties and responsibilities of DESIGNER and the Resident Project Representative (and any assistants) will be set forth in a supplemental agreement. 4.11 If more than one prime contract is to be awarded for construction, materials, equipment and services for the entire Project, designate a person or organization to have authority and responsibility for coordinating the activities among the various prime contractors. 4.12 Furnish to DESIGNER data or estimated figures as to OWNER'S anticipated costs for services to be provided by others for OWNER so that DESIGNER may make the necessary findings to support opinions of probable Total Project Costs. 4.13 Attend the pre-bid meeting, bid opening, pre-construction meetings, construction progress and other job related meetings and substantial completion inspections and final payment inspections. 4.14 Give prompt written notice to DESIGNER whenever OWNER observes or otherwise becomes aware of any development that affects the scope of timing of DESIGNER'S services, or any defect or nonconformance in the work of any Contractor. 4.15 Furnish, or direct DESIGNER to provide, Additional Services as stipulated in paragraph 3.1 of this Agreement or other services as required. 4.16 Require all Private Utilities with facilities in the OWNER’S right of way to: (a) Locate and mark said utilities upon request; (b) Relocate and/or protect said utilities as determined necessary to accommodate the proposed Work; (c) Submit a schedule of the necessary relocation/protection activities to the OWNER for review. 4.17 Bear all costs incident to compliance with the requirements of this Section 4. Doc. #170480v.1 RNK: 5/23/2013 12 5. PERIODS OF PROJECT SERVICE 5.1 The provisions of Section 6 and the various rates of compensation for DESIGNER'S services provided for elsewhere in this Agreement have been agreed to in anticipation of the orderly and continuous progress of the Project through completion of the Construction Phase. DESIGNER'S obligation to render services hereunder will extend for a period which may reasonably be required for the design, award of contracts, construction and initial operation of the Project including extra work and required extensions thereto. 5.2 The services called for in the Study and Report Phase will be completed and the Report submitted within the agreed period after written authorization to proceed with that phase of services which will be given by OWNER. 5.3 After acceptance by OWNER of the Study and Report Phase documents indicating any specific modifications or changes in the general scope, extent or character of the Project desired by OWNER, and upon written authorization from OWNER, DESIGNER shall proceed with the performance of the services called for in the Preliminary Design Phase, and shall submit preliminary design documents and a revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs within the agreed period. 5.4 After acceptance by OWNER of the Preliminary Design Phase documents and revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs, indicating any specific modifications or changes in the general scope, extent or character of the Project desired by OWNER, and upon written authorization from OWNER, DESIGNER shall proceed with the performance of the services called for in the Final Design Phase; and shall deliver Contract Documents and a revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs for all work of Contractor(s) on the Project within the agreed period. 5.5 DESIGNER'S services under the Study and Report Phase, Preliminary Design Phase, and Final Design Phase, shall each be considered complete when the submissions for that phase have been accepted by OWNER. 5.6 After acceptance by OWNER of the DESIGNER'S Drawings, Specifications and other Final Design Phase documentation including the most recent opinion of probable Total Project Costs and upon written authorization to proceed, DESIGNER shall proceed with performance of the services called for in the Bidding or Negotiating phase. This Phase shall terminate and the services to be rendered thereunder shall be considered complete upon commencement of the Construction Phase or upon cessation of negotiations with prospective Contractor(s). 5.7 The Construction Phase will commence with the execution of the first prime contract to be executed for the work of the Project or any part thereof, and will terminate upon written recommendation by DESIGNER of final payment on the last prime contract to be completed. Construction Phase services may be rendered at different times in respect of separate prime contracts if the Project involves more than one prime contract. 5.8 The Operational Phase will commence during the Construction Phase and will terminate upon the last of the following events: (1) one year after the date of Substantial Completion, as defined in the Contract Documents, if the last prime contract for construction, materials and Doc. #170480v.1 RNK: 5/23/2013 13 equipment on which substantial completion is achieved; (2) after final payment to the Contractor(s); (3) after all known issues have been satisfactorily resolved. 5.9 If OWNER requests significant modifications or changes in the general scope, extent or character of the Project, the time of performance of DESIGNER'S services shall be adjusted equitably. 5.10 OWNER shall give prompt authorization to proceed or not proceed with any phase of services after completion of the immediately preceding phase. 5.11 In the event that the work designed or specified by DESIGNER is to be furnished or performed under more than one prime contract, or if DESIGNER'S services are to be separately sequenced with the work of one or more prime contractors (such as in the case of fast-tracking), OWNER and DESIGNER shall, prior to commencement of the Final Design Phase, develop a schedule for performance of DESIGNER'S services during the Final Design, Bidding or Negotiating and Construction Phases in order to sequence and coordinate properly such services as are applicable to the work under such separate contracts. 6. PAYMENTS TO DESIGNER 6.1 PAYMENT. For Project services, DESIGNER will be paid in accordance with the Supplemental Agreement between the parties for the Project. 6.2 OTHER PROVISIONS CONCERNING PAYMENTS. 6.2.1. If OWNER fails to make any payment due DESIGNER for services and expenses within thirty five (35) days after receipt of DESIGNER'S statement therefor, the amounts due DESIGNER will be increased at the rate of one-half percent (1/2%) per month from said thirtieth day, and in addition, DESIGNER may, after giving seven (7) days' written notice to OWNER, suspend services under this Agreement until DESIGNER has been paid in full all amounts due for services, expenses and charges. 6.2.2. In the event of termination by OWNER under paragraph 8.1 upon the completion of any phase of the Basic Services, progress payments due DESIGNER for services rendered through such phase shall constitute total payment for such services. In the event of such termination by OWNER during any phase of the Basic Services, DESIGNER will be paid for services actually and necessarily rendered during that phase by DESIGNER'S principals and employees engaged directly on the Project, on the basis of DESIGNER'S Hourly Costs based upon the fee schedule on file with the City. In the event of any such termination, DESIGNER also will be reimbursed for the reasonable charges of independent professional associates and consultants employed by DESIGNER to render Basic Services, and paid for all unpaid Additional Services and unpaid reimbursables. 6.2.3. Records of DESIGNER'S time pertinent to DESIGNER'S compensation under this Agreement will be kept in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Copies will be made available to OWNER at cost on request prior to final payment for DESIGNER'S services. Doc. #170480v.1 RNK: 5/23/2013 14 6.2.4. DESIGNER shall comply with Minnesota Statute § 471.425. DESIGNER must pay Subcontractor for all undisputed services provided by Subcontractor within ten (10) days of DESIGNER’S receipt of payment from OWNER. DESIGNER must pay interest of one and five- tenths percent (1.5%) per month or any part of a month to Subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to Subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of One Hundred Dollars ($100) or more is Ten Dollars ($10). 7. CONSTRUCTION COST AND OPINIONS OF COST 7.1 CONSTRUCTION COST. The construction cost of the entire Project (herein referred to as "Construction Cost") means the total cost to OWNER of those portions of the entire Project designed and specified by DESIGNER, but it will not include indirect costs such as DESIGNER'S compensation and expenses, the cost of land, rights-of-way, or compensation for or damages to, properties unless this Agreement so specifies, nor will it include OWNER'S legal, accounting, insurance counseling or auditing services, or interest and financing charges incurred in connection with the Project or the cost of other services to be provided by others to OWNER pursuant to paragraph 4. (Construction Cost is one of the items comprising Total Project Cost which is defined in paragraph 2.2.6). 7.2 OPINIONS OF COST. Since DESIGNER has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor(s) methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, DESIGNER'S opinions of probable Total Project Costs and Construction Cost provided for herein are to be made on the basis of DESIGNER'S experience and qualifications and represent DESIGNER'S best judgment as an experienced and qualified professional DESIGNER, familiar with the construction industry; but DESIGNER cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual Total Project or Construction Costs will not vary from opinions of probable cost prepared by DESIGNER. 8. GENERAL 8.1 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains the DESIGNER as an independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. The DESIGNER is not an employee of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. DESIGNER shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. DESIGNER shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for DESIGNER's performance under this Agreement. City and DESIGNER agree that DESIGNER shall not at any time or in any manner represent that DESIGNER or any of DESIGNER's agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. DESIGNER shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for DESIGNER's own FICA payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self-employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. 8.2 TERMINATION. OWNER may terminate this Agreement and any Supplemental Agreement without cause by written notice delivered to the DESIGNER. Upon termination Doc. #170480v.1 RNK: 5/23/2013 15 under this provision if there is no fault of the DESIGNER, the DESIGNER shall be paid for services rendered and reimbursable expenses until the effective date of termination. If however, the OWNER terminates the Agreement because the DESIGNER has failed to perform in accordance with this Agreement, no further payment shall be made to the DESIGNER, and the OWNER may retain another contractor to undertake or complete the work identified in the Contract Documents. If as a result, the OWNER incurs total costs for the work (including payments to both the present contractor and a future contractor) which exceed the not to exceed amount specified in the Contract Documents, if any, then the DESIGNER shall be responsible for the difference between the cost actually incurred and the Agreement amount. 8.3 DOCUMENTS. All documents including Plans and Specifications prepared or furnished by DESIGNER (and DESIGNER'S independent professional associates and consultants) pursuant to this Agreement are instruments of service in respect of the Project and the OWNER will be provided with information and reference in connection with the use and occupancy of the Project by OWNER and others; however, such documents are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by OWNER or others on extensions of the Project or on any other project. Any reuse without written verification or adaptation by DESIGNER for the specific purpose intended will be at OWNER'S sole risk. If the OWNER or DESIGNER terminates this Agreement, copies of all files, records, and drawings in DESIGNER’S possession relating to service performance for OWNER shall be turned over to OWNER without cost to OWNER. 8.4 MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. The DESIGNER must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the DESIGNER pursuant to this Agreement. The DESIGNER is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a government entity. In the event the DESIGNER receives a request to release data, the DESIGNER must immediately notify the OWNER. The OWNER will give the DESIGNER instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released and the DESIGNER will be reimbursed as Additional Public Improvement Services by OWNER under Paragraph 3.1for DESIGNER’S reasonable costs in complying with a request to release data. DESIGNER agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the OWNER, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from DESIGNER’S officers’, agents’, owners’, partners’, employees’, volunteers’, assignees’ or subcontractors’ unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 8.5 INSURANCE 8.5.1. DESIGNER shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect DESIGNER from claims under the Worker's Compensation Acts, automobile liability, and from claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the performance of services under this Agreement. Such insurance shall be written for amounts not less than: Commercial General Liability $2,000,000 each occurrence/aggregate Doc. #170480v.1 RNK: 5/23/2013 16 Automobile Liability $2,000,000 combined single limit Excess/Umbrella Liability $2,000,000 each occurrence/aggregate The OWNER shall be named as an additional insured on the general liability and umbrella policies on a primary and non-contributory basis. That part of the Excess/Umbrella Liability Insurance limit in excess of the required Excess/Umbrella coverage may be utilized to supplement and meet the required limits for Commercial General and Automobile Liability Insurance. 8.5.2. Professional Liability Insurance. The DESIGNER shall secure and maintain a professional liability insurance policy. Said policy shall insure payment of damages for legal liability arising out of the performance of professional services for the OWNER, in the insured's capacity as DESIGNER, if such legal liability is caused by a negligent act, error or omission of the insured or any person or organization for which the insured is legally liable. Said policy shall provide minimum limits of $1,000,000 with a deductible maximum of $50,000 unless the OWNER agrees to a high deductible. 8.5.3. Before commencing work the DESIGNER shall provide the OWNER a certificate of insurance evidencing the required insurance coverage in a form acceptable to OWNER. The certificate shall provide that such insurance will not be canceled, materially changed, or renewal refused until at least 10 days prior written notice has been given to DESIGNER and OWNER in the case of cancellation due to non-payment of premium and at least 30 days prior written notice for any other reason, or such longer notification periods as may be required by statute. Within three days of receipt of such written notice, DESIGNER shall provide a copy of the notice to OWNER. 8.6 INDEMNIFICATION. The DESIGNER agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold OWNER harmless from any damage, liability, or cost (including reasonable attorney's fees and costs of defense) to the extent caused by DESIGNER’s acts, errors, or omissions in the performance of professional services under this Agreement and those of his or her subcontractors or anyone for whom the DESIGNER is liable. 8.7 PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS. DESIGNER shall exercise the same degrees of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the Services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by a professional DESIGNER under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is included in this Agreement. DESIGNER shall comply with applicable laws, statutes, ordinances, and regulations and the OWNER’s mandated standards that OWNER has provided DESIGNER in writing. OWNER shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of DESIGNER’S services. 8.8 NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights to anyone other than OWNER and DESIGNER. 8.9 CONTROLLING LAW/VENUE. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota, without giving effect to the principles of conflict of laws. All proceedings related to this contract shall be venued in the Hennepin County District Court. Doc. #170480v.1 RNK: 5/23/2013 17 8.10 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS 8.10.1. OWNER and DESIGNER each is hereby bound and the partners, successors, executors, administrators and legal representatives of OWNER and DESIGNER are hereby bound to the other party, to this Agreement and to the partners, successors, executors, administrators and legal representatives (and said assigns) of such other party, in respect of all covenants, agreements, and obligations of this Agreement. 8.10.2. Neither OWNER nor DESIGNER shall assign, sublet or transfer any rights under or interest in (including, but without limitation, monies that may become due or monies that are due) this Agreement without the written consent of the other, except to the extent that any assignment, subletting or transfer is mandated by law or the effect of this limitation may be restricted by law. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent DESIGNER from employing such independent professional associates and consultants as DESIGNER may deem appropriate to assist in the performance of services hereunder. 8.10.3. Nothing under this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in this Agreement to anyone other than OWNER and DESIGNER, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the OWNER and DESIGNER and not for the benefit of any other party. 8.11 PROMPT PAYMENT TO SUBCONTRACTORS. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §471.25, Subd. 4a, the Contractor must pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of the Contractor's receipt of payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. The Contractor must pay interest of 1½ percent per month or any part of the month to the subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100.00 or more is $10.00. For an unpaid balance of less than $100.00, the Contractor shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor. A subcontractor who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from the contractor shall be awarded its costs and disbursements, including attorney's fees, incurred in bringing the action. 8.12 COPYRIGHT/PATENT INFRINGEMENT. DESIGNER shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or patent by reason of the use or adoption of any designs, Drawings or Specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the OWNER from loss or damage resulting there from. 8.13 NOTICES. Any notice required under this Agreement will be in writing, addressed to the appropriate party at its address on the signature page and given personally, by facsimile, by registered or certified mail postage prepaid, or by a commercial courier service. All notices shall be effective upon the date of receipt. 8.14 SURVIVAL. All express representations, waivers, indemnifications, and limitations of liability included in this Agreement will survive its completion or termination for any reason. Doc. #170480v.1 RNK: 5/23/2013 18 8.15 SEVERABILITY. Any provision or part of the Agreement held to be void or unenforceable under any Laws or Regulations shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon OWNER and DESIGNER, who agree that the Agreement shall be reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and enforceable provision that comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provision. 8.16 WAIVER. A party’s non-enforcement of any provision shall not constitute a waiver of that provision, nor shall it affect the enforceability of that provision or of the remainder of this Agreement. 9. PRIOR AGREEMENT This Agreement supersedes all prior written and oral contracts and agreements except for the following: _______________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. OWNER: DESIGNER: CITY OF EDINA HGA BY: BY: Its Mayor Its ____________ AND Its City Manager ADDRESS FOR GIVING NOTICES: ADDRESS FOR GIVING NOTICES: Chad Millner PE Name Director of Engineering Title City of Edina HGA 7450 Metro Blvd 420 N. 5th Street Edina, MN 55439 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.K. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Blake Road Final Design Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for Blake Road Final Design with WSB for $196,408. INTRODUCTION: Blake Road from Scriver Road to Spruce Road is scheduled for reconstruction in 2022. WSB is assisting with the south half of the project due to the environmental and permitting issues near Mirror Lake. City staff is designing the north half of the project. Staff recommends approval of the proposal. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Blake Road Final Design WSB Letter Proposal Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12100215 Department:Engineering Buyer:Chad Millner Date: 10/11/2021 Requisition Description:Final Design Services for Blake Rd Reconstruction Vendor:WSB & ASSOCIATES Cost:$196,408.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:SERVIC K - SERVICE CONTRACT DESCRIPTION: This contract will build on the preliminary engineering work WSB has completed to date related to the south half of the Blake Road Street Reconstruction Project scheduled for 2022. Recall a previous service contract was approved for preliminary engineering. WSB is being used for this portion of the project because of the environmental and permitting challenges near Mirror Lake. City staff is designing the north half of the project. BUDGET IMPACT: This project is funded by a combination of Municipal State Aid, special assessments, PACS, and utility funds. 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT: This project will continue to provide premier public infrastructure with a lens towards multi-modal transportation and safety improvements. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: NA Service Contract C:\Plots\CSAH 48 - Steele County\CSAH 48 Letter Proposal.docx701 XENIA AVENUE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COMOctober 11, 2021 Mr. Chad Millner, PE Director of Engineering City of Edina 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Re: Scope of Design and Engineering Services for Blake Road Final Design Dear Mr. Millner: WSB is pleased to submit this scope of services for the development and delivery of final plans and specifications for the Blake Road project at Interlachen Boulevard. We have developed a preliminary plan and believe we are well-suited to deliver final plans. Through the preliminary design we understand the intricacies and challenges of the corridor. Below is a summary of our proposed scope. Please feel free to review and provide feedback to us at your earliest convenience. CONSULTANT SERVICES Task 1 - Project Management 1.1 – General Coordination Project Management is an essential task to ensure the project remains on schedule and on budget. Andrew Plowman will continue to serve as the project manager on the project, and it will be his duty to perform a majority of the tasks to make this project successful. 1.2 – Project Meetings Andrew will facilitate project meetings to review progress and coordinate with additional agencies. WSB has coordinated with the watersheds in preliminary design but additional meetings will be needed. WSB will meet with the regulatory agencies to provide an overview of the project and gather feedback prior to submittal of permit applications. This task assumes one meeting with each of the regulatory agencies (Watershed Districts, DNR, and USACE/WCA TEP). Task 2 – Roadway Design 2.1 – Additional Topographic Survey and Base Mapping WSB will complete additional topographic survey for areas not thoroughly covered during preliminary design. Since the roadway is going to be shifted towards the lake, WSB will need to gather shots on the lakeside. This will require launching a canoe to aid in surveying in this area. WSB will prepare a detailed topographic base drawing and digital terrain model (DTM) of the area that combines the survey already completed in addition to the surveying included with this scope. 2.2 – Roundabout Justification Report (RJR) WSB will provide an RJR for the mini roundabout at Blake Road and Interlachen Boulevard. This report is required for State Aid approval. WSB will use the traffic data and analysis provided during preliminary design along with the geometric roundabout performance checks. A draft and final report documenting the Mr. Chad Millner, PE September 30, 2021 Page 2 C:\Plots\Edina - Blake\Blake Road Letter Proposal.docx data collection, study methodology, warrant and justification for the appropriate intersection control, conclusions and recommendations will be prepared. The report will follow the RJR format and requirements established by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. 2.3 – Roadway Design WSB will complete final design on the preferred alternative, determined during preliminary design. Final roadway design will include some modifications to reduce right of way impacts further as well as provide enough room for power poles to stay above ground on the project, as this was a desire put forth by homeowners on the corridor. Final design will also include the development and coordination of a traffic control and staging plan with impacted businesses, schools, agencies, and homeowners. 2.4 – Watermain Design WSB will complete the design for the replacement and extension of watermain along Blake Road and Interlachen Boulevard, specifically looking at extending service to the properties along the private driveway at Blake Road and the watermain crossing of the land bridge, as not to conflict with the new gas main being installed by Centerpoint Energy. 2.5 – Lighting Design WSB will complete lighting photometrics for the roundabout based on the preferred lighting unit of the City. 2.6 – Design Variance There are two horizontal curves that do not meet state aid standards. WSB will develop the documentation needed to seek a design variance with State Aid, as well as attend the variance committee meeting. 2.7 – Cost Estimates WSB will complete cost estimates for all project milestone plan submittals, as well as any additional estimates needed by the city for council meetings or report where differences from a milestone submittal have been identified. Task 3 – Water Resources and Permitting 3.1 – Drainage Design WSB’s drainage team will complete final design for the storm sewer design to accommodate the proposed roundabout and other surface improvements. This will include pipe design computations and all necessary spread and run calculations. A hydraulic report will be completed consistent with state-aid requirements. Rate control, volume control, and water quality modeling will be completed to meet Watershed and NPDES requirements. A floodplain impact exhibit will be created to determine cut/fill volumes and best ways to provide compensatory storage. The permitting for the project has already been included in the preliminary scope. Task 4 – Utility Coordination 4.1 – Utility Correspondence WSB will continue to track correspondence with the identified utility contacts for each utility on the project. This also includes sharing milestone plan sets with the utility contacts and answering design questions. 4.2 – Utility Coordination Meetings WSB will facilitate 2 additional Utility Coordination Meetings for final design, send out design materials, draft agendas, and complete meeting minutes. At the meeting, the utilities and roadway designers will work to establish the timing and complexity of any relocations of their facilities. Mr. Chad Millner, PE September 30, 2021 Page 3 C:\Plots\Edina - Blake\Blake Road Letter Proposal.docx Task 5 – Structural Design 5.1 – Structural Design WSB’s structural staff will develop draft plans (development of plan sheets is included in Task 8) and calculations for the walls - sheet piling (with cap and potential facing) along the bodies of water and large block walls along the private properties. Plans will include elevations, plan view and sections. Geotechnical information will be provided by the City (expected in October 2021). The sheet piling walls will include LL surcharge from traffic and trails, concrete caps with railings, and additional structural thickness to accommodate 75 years of corrosion. The land bridge section will include a culvert section that will be incorporated and detailed in the wall plans. The geotechnical information will be critical in developing the proper depth of the sheet piling. The PMBW (large bock) walls will be under 8’-0” in height wherever possible to avoid geogrid reinforcement and limit construction impacts. Temporary shoring for these walls will be examined to see if it is needed, but WSB will have the Contractor design. Construction staging will be discussed, so the order of wall construction is identified during the design. Construction loads will be incorporated into the design of the walls. Survey data will also be important during the wall design, to identify limiting construction impacts and opportunities to shorten walls. The aesthetics of the walls will be finalized during the design. This includes railing types, textures, colors, caps, facing, lighting, swales, and stepped versus sloped configuration. Our deliverables will include quantities, cost estimates, calculations, special provisions, and plans (elevations, plan view, sections, details, and aesthetic sheets for each wall. All structural designs will be in accordance with MnDOT Manuals. Task 6 – Landscape Design 7.1 – Landscape Design WSB’s staff will provide landscaping design based on coordination with city and property owners. This includes the re-establishment of vegetation between the private drive and Blake Road, as well as screening the sheet pile and slope protection at Mirror Lake. Task 7 – Right of Way Support 7.1 – Parcel Sketches and Legal Descriptions For Right of Way Acquisition Support, WSB’s staff will develop parcel sketches and legal descriptions for the properties on the project. WSB anticipates easements on approximately 25 properties – some easements simply construction easements and other permanent right of way, which will be determined early in the final design phase. It is assumed that others will be completing the right of way acquisition. Task 8 – Plan Preparation 8.1 – Plan Preparation WSB will develop the following plan sets for review: 60/90/95 and 100% plan sets. Each plan set will adhere to state aid standards and any approved variances. 8.2 – Specifications WSB will create the corresponding special provisions and project manual for the construction of the project. Mr. Chad Millner, PE September 30, 2021 Page 4 C:\Plots\Edina - Blake\Blake Road Letter Proposal.docx Schedule The project is scheduled to be constructed in 2022, with a potential to be moved to 2023 due to funding availability. WSB will move forward with final design, assuming 2022 construction. Final design and plan production will be at 60% in late November for the public hearing and variance committee meeting, and final plans are to be completed in January 2022 for construction to begin in the spring of 2022. PROPOSED FEE We understand this project cost is based on cost plus fixed fee. We propose to complete this project for the below proposed fee below: Total Project Fee: ............................................................................$196,408 I have attached a summary of our fees based upon the above scope of work. WSB will invoice the City of Edina for the actual hours worked at each employee classification with the current WSB hourly rate up to the Total Project Fee. No work in excess of the Total Project Fee will be completed without prior written approval from the City of Edina. This letter represents our understanding of the project scope. If you are in agreement, please sign on the space provided and return one original signed copy to us for our records. We will start immediately upon receipt of the signed agreement. Sincerely, WSB Andrew Plowman, P.E. Project Manager, Director of Transportation – Design (MN/ND) ACCEPTED: City of Edina By: ______________________________________ _________ Date: 10/9/2021 Task Description Estimated Hours Task Cost Project Manager Design Lead/Utility Coordinator Graduate Engineer CAD Technician Hydraulic Design Lead Hydraulic Design Support Structural Engineer Traffic/ Lighting Engineer Landscape Design Lead Landscape Design Support Survey Technician 2-Person Survey Crew Clerical Total 1 Project Management 124 $21,768 1.1 General Coordination 40 4 4 8 56 $9,880 1.2 Meetings 32 8 16 8 4 68 $11,888 2 Roadway Design 234 $33,836 2.1 Topographic Survey and Base Mapping 2 8 4 24 38 $6,748 2.2 Roundabout Justification Report 2 4 8 16 30 $4,312 2.3 Roadway Design 4 20 40 8 72 $9,848 2.4 Watermain Design 4 8 16 28 $3,952 2.5 Lighting Design 4 8 12 $1,720 2.6 Design Variance 4 4 16 4 28 $3,896 2.7 Cost Estimates 2 8 8 8 26 $3,360 3 Water Resources and Permitting 72 $11,328 3.1 Drainage Design 48 24 72 $11,328 4 Utility Coordination 40 $6,224 4.1 Utility Correspondence 4 8 4 8 24 $3,608 4.2 Utility Coordination Meeting 4 12 16 $2,616 5 Structural Design 124 $19,712 5.1 Structural Design 16 48 60 124 $19,712 6 Landscape Design 40 $5,688 6.1 Landscape Design 16 24 40 $5,688 7 Right of Way Support 80 $11,968 7.1 Parcel Sketches and Legal Descriptions 16 64 80 $11,968 8 Plan Preparation 572 $85,884 8.1 Plan Preparation 16 80 132 196 8 64 40 12 8 16 572 $80,756 8.2 Specifications 8 4 12 8 32 $5,128 SUBTOTAL 120 152 238 300 76 96 120 36 24 40 68 24 24 $196,408 Labor Rates $192 $154 $122 $140 $174 $124 $184 $145 $150 $137 $152 $199 $96 Labor Subtotal $23,040 $23,408 $29,036 $42,000 $13,224 $11,904 $22,080 $5,220 $3,600 $5,480 $10,336 $4,776 $2,304 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF SERVICES $196,408 Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.L. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Change Order No. 1: Watermain Rehabilitation, Contract ENG21-7, Improvement WM-597 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for Change Order No. 1 for Watermain Rehabilitation with Fer-Pal Construction USA LLC for $86,594. INTRODUCTION: Contract Change Order No. 1 increased the contract by $86,594.17 from $394,922.50 to $481,516.67 due to discrepancies in the asbuilt information and conflicts in the field. Staff recommends approval. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Change Order No. 1 Watermain Rehabilitation Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12100124 Department: Engineering Buyer: Chad Millner Date: 05/21/2021 Requisition Description: ENG 21-7 WM-597 Watermain Rehab Vendor: FER-PAL CONSTRUCTION USA LLC Original Cost: $394,922.50 Revised Cost: $481,516,67 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:QUOTE/BD - QUOTE/BID DESCRIPTION: This project will rehabilitation existing water distribution pipes under MnDOT highways at two locations, Highway 62 and Valley View Road & Highway 100 and 77th Street. The rehabilitation will be completed by trenchless cured-in-place-pipe (CIPP) method to reduce construction limits. CIPP builds a structural pipe within a pipe with minimal loss of pipe size. It has an expected service life of 75-years. BUDGET IMPACT: Funded from 2019 bond proceed surplus. Oct. 19, 2021: Contract Change Order #1 increased the Contract by $86,594.17 from $394,922.50 to $481,516.67 due to discrepancies in the asbuilt information and conflicts in the field. 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT: A reliable water distribution system is vital to fire suppression systems and clean drinking water. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Rehabilitation by trenchless methods reduces the amount of GHG emissions compared to open cut methods. Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.M. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Derik Otten, Facility Manager Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Facility Asset Management Software Tool Renewal Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase of facility asset management software renewal with Gordian for $50,296. INTRODUCTION: This is a 3-year renewal of a software that the city has been using to manage building asset information to track conditions and improvements, and for analysis and reporting. It is a critical tool for facility capital budget development, lifecycle planning for building assets, and forecasting for long-term capital plans. Contract terms are three years, billed per annum. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Facility Asset Management Software Tool Renewal Gordian Agreement Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12100208 Department:Engineering Buyer:Derik Otten Date: 10/04/2021 Requisition Description:Gordian SaaS Service for VFA Software Vendor:VFA INC Cost:$50,296.46 REPLACEMENT or NEW:NEW - NEW PURCHASE SOURCE:SERVIC K - SERVICE CONTRACT DESCRIPTION: This project will continue the relationship with Gordian. They provide Saas Software services for the VFA software. This software tracks city owned facilities and their internal assets and components. It is a critical tool in planning, budgeting and preparing Capital Improvement Plans for city owned facilities. BUDGET IMPACT: This project is funded from the facilities budget and spread over 3-years, billed annually. 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT: This tool provides information to help in the planning, budgeting and preparing Capital Improvement Plans for city owned facilities to ensure our buildings are meeting the service requirements of our customers. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:NA Service Contract Document Q-223292-1 Page 1 of 2 30 Patewood Drive Suite 350 Greenville, SC. 29615 Web: www.gordian.com Client Information Client Name: Edina MN (City of) Client Contact Name: Derik Otten Bill To: Accounts Payable 7450 Metro Blvd Edina, MN 55439 USA Client Contact Email: dotten@edinamn.gov Ship To: Derik Otten 7450 Metro Blvd Edina, MN 55439 USA Client Contact Phone: (952) 826-0356 Billing Email: edinaap@edinamn.gov Quote Information Quote #: Q-223292-1 Quote Expiration: 9/30/2021 Start Date: 10/1/2021 End Date: 9/30/2024 Invoice Frequency: Annual SaaS Information and Fees Product Subscription Fees Quantity/Metric Year 1 Invoice Period Beginning [10-1-2021] Year 2 Invoice Period Beginning [10-1-2022] Year 3 Invoice Period Beginning [10-1-2023] Total Fees Initial Term VFA.facility 813,935 Square Feet 13,768.52 14,456.94 15,179.79 USD 43,405.25 VFA.facility Report Author 1 License(s) 2,185.95 2,295.25 2,410.01 USD 6,891.21 Total Committed Fees USD 15,954.47 USD 16,752.19 USD 17,589.80 USD 50,296.46 Additional Terms 1 VFA, Inc., a subsidiary of The Gordian Group, Inc., (VFA) shall grant a license to access the SaaS Services for the non-cancelable period listed above ("Committed SaaS Term"). The maximum annual increase to fees during the Committed SaaS Term shall not exceed 5.00percent. Thereafter, the SaaS Services shall automatically renew at the then current fees. Document Q-223292-1 Page 2 of 2 2 All fees shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days of the date of VFA's invoice. All fees listed exclude any applicable taxes. 3 The pricing and offer in this Order Document are provided in return for an executed Order Document received by Gail Davenport by the Quote Expiration date listed above. 4 Use of the SaaS Service and this Order Document are subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement dated 9/29/2015, between Edina MN (City of) and VFA, Inc. 5 Support Terms and Conditions are outlined in the Gordian Customer Support Policy document, available upon request. 6 Overages - Any overages over the committed metric amount will be invoiced 30% over the average metric price of the current year's fees. Overages, if any, will be assessed and invoiced quarterly. Not charging for overages is not a waiver of those overages, VFA retains the right to retroactively true-up metric counts. Overages will continue to be invoiced until such time the committed metric amount is changed to reflect overages. Acknowledged and Agreed by the Duly Authorized Representatives of the Parties Client: VFA, Inc. Signature: Signature: Print Name: Print Name: Title: Title: Date: Effective Date: PO Required? Yes [ ] No [ ] If Yes, PO must be provided. Tax exempt? Yes [ ] No [ ] If Yes, Tax Exemption Certificate must be provided. Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.N. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Alisha McAndrews, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-94: Providing for the Sale of Refunding Bonds Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2021-94 providing for the sale of $4,620,000 G.O. Refunding Bonds, Series 2021B and $2,430,000 General Obligation Recreational Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2021C on November 16, 2021. INTRODUCTION: The proposed issuance includes financing to execute a current refunding of the City’s General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A. These bonds were issued to provide financing for the City's Public Works facility. Refunding these bonds will reduce the City's debt service expense by approximately $200,000 for each of the 2022 and 2023 levy years, and then spread the payments over the existing term. The proposed issuance also includes issuing the City’s Recreational Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2021C to execute a current refunding of the City’s General Obligation Bonds, Series 2012C and the City’s General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013B. These bonds were issued to finance Braemar Ice Arena improvements and the Braemar Golf Dome reconstruction. These refunding opportunities are expected to reduce the debt service expense to the City's recreational enterprise fund by approximately $145,000 over the remaining term. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution 2021-94: Providing for the Sale of Refunding Bonds PreSaleReport.Edina.2021B PreSaleReport.Edina.2021C Resolution No. 2021-94 Resolution Providing for the Sale of $4,620,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2021B and $2,430,000 General Obligation Recreational Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2021C WHEREAS, the City of Edina, Minnesota (the “City”) has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the City’s estimated $4,620,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2021B (the “2021B Bonds”) to provide financing to execute a current refunding of the callable 2023 to 2030 maturities of the City’s General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A dated October 10, 2013, in order to reduce debt service expense; and WHEREAS, the City has also determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the City’s estimated $2,430,000 General Obligation Recreational Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2021C (the “2021C Bonds”) to provide financing to execute a current refunding of the callable 2023 to 2033 maturities of the City’s General Obligation Bonds, Series 2012C dated November 15, 2012 and callable 2023 to 2029 maturities of the City’s General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013B dated October 10, 2013, in order to reduce debt service expense; and WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc. in Roseville, Minnesota (“Ehlers”) as its independent municipal advisor for the 2021B Bonds and 2021C Bonds in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Authorization. The City Council hereby authorizes Ehlers to assist the City for the sale of the 2021B Bonds and 2021C Bonds. 2. Meeting; Proposal Opening. The City Council shall meet at 7:00 p.m. on November 16, 2021, for the purpose of considering proposals for and awarding the sale of the 2021B Bonds and 2021C Bonds. 3. Official Statement. In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the City are hereby authorized to participate, in cooperation with Ehlers, in the preparation of an official statement for each of the 2021B and 2021C Bonds and to execute and deliver them on behalf of the City upon their completion. Passed and adopted this 19th day of October, 2021. ATTEST: ____________________________ ________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of October 19, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Special Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of __________, 20___. _______________________________ City Clerk • • • • City of Edina, Minnesota $4,620,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2021B Issue Summary - Current Refunding Series 2013A GO Bonds Assuming GO Non-BQ "AAA" Market Rates + 15 bps Total Issue Sources And Uses Dated 12/16/2021 | Delivered 12/16/2021 Current Ref 2013A - Levy Current Ref 2013A - PIR Issue Summary Sources Of Funds Par Amount of Bonds $3,080,000.00 $1,540,000.00 $4,620,000.00 Total Sources $3,080,000.00 $1,540,000.00 $4,620,000.00 Uses Of Funds Total Underwriter's Discount (1.200%)36,960.00 18,480.00 55,440.00 Costs of Issuance 42,333.34 21,166.66 63,500.00 Deposit to Current Refunding Fund 3,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 4,500,000.00 Rounding Amount 706.66 353.34 1,060.00 Total Uses $3,080,000.00 $1,540,000.00 $4,620,000.00 Series 2021B GO Ref Bds C | Issue Summary | 10/11/2021 | 10:45 AM City of Edina, Minnesota $4,620,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2021B Issue Summary - Current Refunding Series 2013A GO Bonds Assuming GO Non-BQ "AAA" Market Rates + 15 bps Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 12/16/2021 ----- 08/01/2022 --23,726.57 23,726.57 - 02/01/2023 385,000.00 0.400%18,981.25 403,981.25 427,707.82 08/01/2023 --18,211.25 18,211.25 - 02/01/2024 395,000.00 0.450%18,211.25 413,211.25 431,422.50 08/01/2024 --17,322.50 17,322.50 - 02/01/2025 630,000.00 0.550%17,322.50 647,322.50 664,645.00 08/01/2025 --15,590.00 15,590.00 - 02/01/2026 635,000.00 0.700%15,590.00 650,590.00 666,180.00 08/01/2026 --13,367.50 13,367.50 - 02/01/2027 640,000.00 0.850%13,367.50 653,367.50 666,735.00 08/01/2027 --10,647.50 10,647.50 - 02/01/2028 640,000.00 1.000%10,647.50 650,647.50 661,295.00 08/01/2028 --7,447.50 7,447.50 - 02/01/2029 645,000.00 1.100%7,447.50 652,447.50 659,895.00 08/01/2029 --3,900.00 3,900.00 - 02/01/2030 650,000.00 1.200%3,900.00 653,900.00 657,800.00 Total $4,620,000.00 -$215,680.32 $4,835,680.32 - Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $22,937.50 Average Life 4.965 Years Average Coupon 0.9402957% Net Interest Cost (NIC)1.1819959% True Interest Cost (TIC)1.1886074% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 0.9381738% All Inclusive Cost (AIC)1.4803873% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 0.9402957% Weighted Average Maturity 4.965 Years Series 2021B GO Ref Bds C | Issue Summary | 10/11/2021 | 10:45 AM City of Edina, Minnesota $4,620,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2021B Issue Summary - Current Refunding Series 2013A GO Bonds Assuming GO Non-BQ "AAA" Market Rates + 15 bps Debt Service Comparison Date Total P+I Net New D/S Old Net D/S Savings 02/01/2022 -(1,060.00)-1,060.00 02/01/2023 427,707.82 427,707.82 643,075.00 215,367.18 02/01/2024 431,422.50 431,422.50 646,600.00 215,177.50 02/01/2025 664,645.00 664,645.00 645,850.00 (18,795.00) 02/01/2026 666,180.00 666,180.00 642,350.00 (23,830.00) 02/01/2027 666,735.00 666,735.00 645,850.00 (20,885.00) 02/01/2028 661,295.00 661,295.00 643,750.00 (17,545.00) 02/01/2029 659,895.00 659,895.00 641,200.00 (18,695.00) 02/01/2030 657,800.00 657,800.00 641,700.00 (16,100.00) Total $4,835,680.32 $4,834,620.32 $5,150,375.00 $315,754.68 PV Analysis Summary (Net to Net) Gross PV Debt Service Savings.....................314,961.87 Net PV Cashflow Savings @ 0.938%(Bond Yield).....314,961.87 Contingency or Rounding Amount....................1,060.00 Net Present Value Benefit $316,021.87 Net PV Benefit / $4,934,961.87 PV Refunded Debt Service 6.404% Net PV Benefit / $4,500,000 Refunded Principal...7.023% Net PV Benefit / $4,620,000 Refunding Principal..6.840% Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 12/16/2021 Refunding Delivery Date 12/16/2021 Series 2021B GO Ref Bds C | Issue Summary | 10/11/2021 | 10:45 AM City of Edina, Minnesota $3,080,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2021B Current Ref 2013A - Levy Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 12/16/2021 ----- 08/01/2022 --16,165.63 16,165.63 - 02/01/2023 200,000.00 0.400%12,932.50 212,932.50 229,098.13 08/01/2023 --12,532.50 12,532.50 - 02/01/2024 205,000.00 0.450%12,532.50 217,532.50 230,065.00 08/01/2024 --12,071.25 12,071.25 - 02/01/2025 440,000.00 0.550%12,071.25 452,071.25 464,142.50 08/01/2025 --10,861.25 10,861.25 - 02/01/2026 440,000.00 0.700%10,861.25 450,861.25 461,722.50 08/01/2026 --9,321.25 9,321.25 - 02/01/2027 445,000.00 0.850%9,321.25 454,321.25 463,642.50 08/01/2027 --7,430.00 7,430.00 - 02/01/2028 445,000.00 1.000%7,430.00 452,430.00 459,860.00 08/01/2028 --5,205.00 5,205.00 - 02/01/2029 450,000.00 1.100%5,205.00 455,205.00 460,410.00 08/01/2029 --2,730.00 2,730.00 - 02/01/2030 455,000.00 1.200%2,730.00 457,730.00 460,460.00 Total $3,080,000.00 -$149,400.63 $3,229,400.63 - Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $15,760.00 Average Life 5.117 Years Average Coupon 0.9479735% Net Interest Cost (NIC)1.1824913% True Interest Cost (TIC)1.1890614% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 0.9381738% All Inclusive Cost (AIC)1.4722179% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 0.9479735% Weighted Average Maturity 5.117 Years Series 2021B GO Ref Bds C | Current Ref 2013A - Levy | 10/11/2021 | 10:45 AM City of Edina, Minnesota $3,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A CR 2009B BABs - Levy - Proposed Cur Ref Tax Public Proj Rev Bonds Debt Service To Maturity And To Call Date Refunded Bonds D/S To Call Principal Coupon Interest Refunded D/S 12/16/2021 ------ 02/01/2022 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 ---- 08/01/2022 ----44,362.50 44,362.50 02/01/2023 --340,000.00 2.250%44,362.50 384,362.50 08/01/2023 ----40,537.50 40,537.50 02/01/2024 --350,000.00 3.000%40,537.50 390,537.50 08/01/2024 ----35,287.50 35,287.50 02/01/2025 --360,000.00 2.500%35,287.50 395,287.50 08/01/2025 ----30,787.50 30,787.50 02/01/2026 --365,000.00 3.000%30,787.50 395,787.50 08/01/2026 ----25,312.50 25,312.50 02/01/2027 --380,000.00 3.000%25,312.50 405,312.50 08/01/2027 ----19,612.50 19,612.50 02/01/2028 --390,000.00 3.000%19,612.50 409,612.50 08/01/2028 ----13,762.50 13,762.50 02/01/2029 --400,000.00 3.250%13,762.50 413,762.50 08/01/2029 ----7,262.50 7,262.50 02/01/2030 --415,000.00 3.500%7,262.50 422,262.50 Total $3,000,000.00 $3,000,000.00 $3,000,000.00 -$433,850.00 $3,433,850.00 Yield Statistics Base date for Avg. Life & Avg. Coupon Calculation 12/16/2021 Average Life 4.772 Years Average Coupon 3.1082126% Weighted Average Maturity (Par Basis) 4.772 Years Weighted Average Maturity (Original Price Basis) 4.772 Years Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 12/16/2021 Refunding Delivery Date 12/16/2021 Series 2013A GO Bonds - C | CR 2009B BABs - Levy | 10/11/2021 | 10:45 AM City of Edina, Minnesota $3,080,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2021B Current Ref 2013A - Levy Debt Service Comparison Date Total P+I Net New D/S Old Net D/S Savings 02/01/2022 -(706.66)-706.66 02/01/2023 229,098.13 229,098.13 428,725.00 199,626.87 02/01/2024 230,065.00 230,065.00 431,075.00 201,010.00 02/01/2025 464,142.50 464,142.50 430,575.00 (33,567.50) 02/01/2026 461,722.50 461,722.50 426,575.00 (35,147.50) 02/01/2027 463,642.50 463,642.50 430,625.00 (33,017.50) 02/01/2028 459,860.00 459,860.00 429,225.00 (30,635.00) 02/01/2029 460,410.00 460,410.00 427,525.00 (32,885.00) 02/01/2030 460,460.00 460,460.00 429,525.00 (30,935.00) Total $3,229,400.63 $3,228,693.97 $3,433,850.00 $205,156.03 PV Analysis Summary (Net to Net) Gross PV Debt Service Savings.....................208,976.86 Net PV Cashflow Savings @ 0.938%(Bond Yield).....208,976.86 Contingency or Rounding Amount....................706.66 Net Present Value Benefit $209,683.52 Net PV Benefit / $3,290,168.09 PV Refunded Debt Service 6.373% Net PV Benefit / $3,000,000 Refunded Principal...6.989% Net PV Benefit / $3,080,000 Refunding Principal..6.808% Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 12/16/2021 Refunding Delivery Date 12/16/2021 Series 2021B GO Ref Bds C | Current Ref 2013A - Levy | 10/11/2021 | 10:45 AM City of Edina, Minnesota $1,540,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2021B Current Ref 2013A - PIR Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 12/16/2021 ----- 08/01/2022 --7,560.94 7,560.94 - 02/01/2023 185,000.00 0.400%6,048.75 191,048.75 198,609.69 08/01/2023 --5,678.75 5,678.75 - 02/01/2024 190,000.00 0.450%5,678.75 195,678.75 201,357.50 08/01/2024 --5,251.25 5,251.25 - 02/01/2025 190,000.00 0.550%5,251.25 195,251.25 200,502.50 08/01/2025 --4,728.75 4,728.75 - 02/01/2026 195,000.00 0.700%4,728.75 199,728.75 204,457.50 08/01/2026 --4,046.25 4,046.25 - 02/01/2027 195,000.00 0.850%4,046.25 199,046.25 203,092.50 08/01/2027 --3,217.50 3,217.50 - 02/01/2028 195,000.00 1.000%3,217.50 198,217.50 201,435.00 08/01/2028 --2,242.50 2,242.50 - 02/01/2029 195,000.00 1.100%2,242.50 197,242.50 199,485.00 08/01/2029 --1,170.00 1,170.00 - 02/01/2030 195,000.00 1.200%1,170.00 196,170.00 197,340.00 Total $1,540,000.00 -$66,279.69 $1,606,279.69 - Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $7,177.50 Average Life 4.661 Years Average Coupon 0.9234370% Net Interest Cost (NIC)1.1809083% True Interest Cost (TIC)1.1876118% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 0.9381738% All Inclusive Cost (AIC)1.4983110% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 0.9234370% Weighted Average Maturity 4.661 Years Series 2021B GO Ref Bds C | Current Ref 2013A - PIR | 10/11/2021 | 10:45 AM City of Edina, Minnesota $1,500,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A PIR Bonds Debt Service To Maturity And To Call Date Refunded Bonds D/S To Call Principal Coupon Interest Refunded D/S 12/16/2021 ------ 02/01/2022 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 ---- 08/01/2022 ----22,175.00 22,175.00 02/01/2023 --170,000.00 2.250%22,175.00 192,175.00 08/01/2023 ----20,262.50 20,262.50 02/01/2024 --175,000.00 3.000%20,262.50 195,262.50 08/01/2024 ----17,637.50 17,637.50 02/01/2025 --180,000.00 2.500%17,637.50 197,637.50 08/01/2025 ----15,387.50 15,387.50 02/01/2026 --185,000.00 3.000%15,387.50 200,387.50 08/01/2026 ----12,612.50 12,612.50 02/01/2027 --190,000.00 3.000%12,612.50 202,612.50 08/01/2027 ----9,762.50 9,762.50 02/01/2028 --195,000.00 3.000%9,762.50 204,762.50 08/01/2028 ----6,837.50 6,837.50 02/01/2029 --200,000.00 3.250%6,837.50 206,837.50 08/01/2029 ----3,587.50 3,587.50 02/01/2030 --205,000.00 3.500%3,587.50 208,587.50 Total $1,500,000.00 $1,500,000.00 $1,500,000.00 -$216,525.00 $1,716,525.00 Yield Statistics Base date for Avg. Life & Avg. Coupon Calculation 12/16/2021 Average Life 4.765 Years Average Coupon 3.1069430% Weighted Average Maturity (Par Basis) 4.765 Years Weighted Average Maturity (Original Price Basis) 4.765 Years Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 12/16/2021 Refunding Delivery Date 12/16/2021 Series 2013A GO Bonds - C | PIR Bonds | 10/11/2021 | 10:45 AM City of Edina, Minnesota $1,540,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2021B Current Ref 2013A - PIR Debt Service Comparison Date Total P+I Net New D/S Old Net D/S Savings 02/01/2022 -(353.34)-353.34 02/01/2023 198,609.69 198,609.69 214,350.00 15,740.31 02/01/2024 201,357.50 201,357.50 215,525.00 14,167.50 02/01/2025 200,502.50 200,502.50 215,275.00 14,772.50 02/01/2026 204,457.50 204,457.50 215,775.00 11,317.50 02/01/2027 203,092.50 203,092.50 215,225.00 12,132.50 02/01/2028 201,435.00 201,435.00 214,525.00 13,090.00 02/01/2029 199,485.00 199,485.00 213,675.00 14,190.00 02/01/2030 197,340.00 197,340.00 212,175.00 14,835.00 Total $1,606,279.69 $1,605,926.35 $1,716,525.00 $110,598.65 PV Analysis Summary (Net to Net) Gross PV Debt Service Savings.....................105,985.00 Net PV Cashflow Savings @ 0.938%(Bond Yield).....105,985.00 Contingency or Rounding Amount....................353.34 Net Present Value Benefit $106,338.34 Net PV Benefit / $1,644,793.78 PV Refunded Debt Service 6.465% Net PV Benefit / $1,500,000 Refunded Principal...7.089% Net PV Benefit / $1,540,000 Refunding Principal..6.905% Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 12/16/2021 Refunding Delivery Date 12/16/2021 Series 2021B GO Ref Bds C | Current Ref 2013A - PIR | 10/11/2021 | 10:45 AM • • • • City of Edina, Minnesota $2,430,000 G.O. Recreational Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2021C Issue Summary - Current Refunding 2012C & 2013B Assuming GO Non-BQ "AAA" Market Rates + 15 bps Total Issue Sources And Uses Dated 12/16/2021 | Delivered 12/16/2021 Current Ref 2012C GO Bonds Current Ref 2013B GO Bonds Issue Summary Sources Of Funds Par Amount of Bonds $1,820,000.00 $610,000.00 $2,430,000.00 Total Sources $1,820,000.00 $610,000.00 $2,430,000.00 Uses Of Funds Total Underwriter's Discount (1.200%)21,840.00 7,320.00 29,160.00 Costs of Issuance 31,082.30 10,417.70 41,500.00 Deposit to Current Refunding Fund 1,765,000.00 590,000.00 2,355,000.00 Rounding Amount 2,077.70 2,262.30 4,340.00 Total Uses $1,820,000.00 $610,000.00 $2,430,000.00 Series 2021C GO Rec Ref B | Issue Summary | 10/11/2021 | 11:23 AM City of Edina, Minnesota $2,430,000 G.O. Recreational Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2021C Issue Summary - Current Refunding 2012C & 2013B Assuming GO Non-BQ "AAA" Market Rates + 15 bps Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 12/16/2021 ----- 08/01/2022 --13,959.37 13,959.37 - 02/01/2023 245,000.00 0.400%11,167.50 256,167.50 270,126.87 08/01/2023 --10,677.50 10,677.50 - 02/01/2024 245,000.00 0.450%10,677.50 255,677.50 266,355.00 08/01/2024 --10,126.25 10,126.25 - 02/01/2025 245,000.00 0.550%10,126.25 255,126.25 265,252.50 08/01/2025 --9,452.50 9,452.50 - 02/01/2026 255,000.00 0.700%9,452.50 264,452.50 273,905.00 08/01/2026 --8,560.00 8,560.00 - 02/01/2027 245,000.00 0.850%8,560.00 253,560.00 262,120.00 08/01/2027 --7,518.75 7,518.75 - 02/01/2028 255,000.00 1.000%7,518.75 262,518.75 270,037.50 08/01/2028 --6,243.75 6,243.75 - 02/01/2029 260,000.00 1.100%6,243.75 266,243.75 272,487.50 08/01/2029 --4,813.75 4,813.75 - 02/01/2030 165,000.00 1.200%4,813.75 169,813.75 174,627.50 08/01/2030 --3,823.75 3,823.75 - 02/01/2031 170,000.00 1.350%3,823.75 173,823.75 177,647.50 08/01/2031 --2,676.25 2,676.25 - 02/01/2032 170,000.00 1.450%2,676.25 172,676.25 175,352.50 08/01/2032 --1,443.75 1,443.75 - 02/01/2033 175,000.00 1.650%1,443.75 176,443.75 177,887.50 Total $2,430,000.00 -$155,799.37 $2,585,799.37 - Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $13,843.75 Average Life 5.697 Years Average Coupon 1.1254131% Net Interest Cost (NIC)1.3360496% True Interest Cost (TIC)1.3407010% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 1.1199488% All Inclusive Cost (AIC)1.6614122% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 1.1254131% Weighted Average Maturity 5.697 Years Series 2021C GO Rec Ref B | Issue Summary | 10/11/2021 | 11:23 AM City of Edina, Minnesota $2,430,000 G.O. Recreational Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2021C Issue Summary - Current Refunding 2012C & 2013B Assuming GO Non-BQ "AAA" Market Rates + 15 bps Debt Service Comparison Date Total P+I Net New D/S Old Net D/S Savings 02/01/2022 -(4,340.00)-4,340.00 02/01/2023 270,126.87 270,126.87 282,658.76 12,531.89 02/01/2024 266,355.00 266,355.00 282,508.76 16,153.76 02/01/2025 265,252.50 265,252.50 282,027.50 16,775.00 02/01/2026 273,905.00 273,905.00 286,440.00 12,535.00 02/01/2027 262,120.00 262,120.00 280,402.50 18,282.50 02/01/2028 270,037.50 270,037.50 283,982.50 13,945.00 02/01/2029 272,487.50 272,487.50 287,277.50 14,790.00 02/01/2030 174,627.50 174,627.50 184,875.00 10,247.50 02/01/2031 177,647.50 177,647.50 185,750.00 8,102.50 02/01/2032 175,352.50 175,352.50 185,650.00 10,297.50 02/01/2033 177,887.50 177,887.50 185,400.00 7,512.50 Total $2,585,799.37 $2,581,459.37 $2,726,972.52 $145,513.15 PV Analysis Summary (Net to Net) Gross PV Debt Service Savings.....................129,787.64 Net PV Cashflow Savings @ 1.661%(AIC)............129,787.64 Contingency or Rounding Amount....................4,340.00 Net Present Value Benefit $134,127.64 Net PV Benefit / $2,563,344.92 PV Refunded Debt Service 5.233% Net PV Benefit / $2,355,000 Refunded Principal...5.695% Net PV Benefit / $2,430,000 Refunding Principal..5.520% Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 12/16/2021 Refunding Delivery Date 12/16/2021 Series 2021C GO Rec Ref B | Issue Summary | 10/11/2021 | 11:23 AM City of Edina, Minnesota $1,820,000 G.O. Recreational Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2021C Current Ref 2012C GO Bonds Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 12/16/2021 ----- 08/01/2022 --11,189.06 11,189.06 - 02/01/2023 160,000.00 0.400%8,951.25 168,951.25 180,140.31 08/01/2023 --8,631.25 8,631.25 - 02/01/2024 160,000.00 0.450%8,631.25 168,631.25 177,262.50 08/01/2024 --8,271.25 8,271.25 - 02/01/2025 160,000.00 0.550%8,271.25 168,271.25 176,542.50 08/01/2025 --7,831.25 7,831.25 - 02/01/2026 165,000.00 0.700%7,831.25 172,831.25 180,662.50 08/01/2026 --7,253.75 7,253.75 - 02/01/2027 160,000.00 0.850%7,253.75 167,253.75 174,507.50 08/01/2027 --6,573.75 6,573.75 - 02/01/2028 165,000.00 1.000%6,573.75 171,573.75 178,147.50 08/01/2028 --5,748.75 5,748.75 - 02/01/2029 170,000.00 1.100%5,748.75 175,748.75 181,497.50 08/01/2029 --4,813.75 4,813.75 - 02/01/2030 165,000.00 1.200%4,813.75 169,813.75 174,627.50 08/01/2030 --3,823.75 3,823.75 - 02/01/2031 170,000.00 1.350%3,823.75 173,823.75 177,647.50 08/01/2031 --2,676.25 2,676.25 - 02/01/2032 170,000.00 1.450%2,676.25 172,676.25 175,352.50 08/01/2032 --1,443.75 1,443.75 - 02/01/2033 175,000.00 1.650%1,443.75 176,443.75 177,887.50 Total $1,820,000.00 -$134,275.31 $1,954,275.31 - Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $11,302.50 Average Life 6.210 Years Average Coupon 1.1880142% Net Interest Cost (NIC)1.3812458% True Interest Cost (TIC)1.3860474% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 1.1199488% All Inclusive Cost (AIC)1.6816834% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 1.1880142% Weighted Average Maturity 6.210 Years Series 2021C GO Rec Ref B | Current Ref 2012C GO Bond | 10/11/2021 | 11:23 AM City of Edina, MN $1,765,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2012C Debt Service To Maturity And To Call Date Refunded Bonds D/S To Call Principal Coupon Interest Refunded D/S 12/16/2021 ------ 02/01/2022 1,765,000.00 1,765,000.00 ---- 08/01/2022 ----21,871.88 21,871.88 02/01/2023 --145,000.00 2.000%21,871.88 166,871.88 08/01/2023 ----20,421.88 20,421.88 02/01/2024 --145,000.00 2.125%20,421.88 165,421.88 08/01/2024 ----18,881.25 18,881.25 02/01/2025 --150,000.00 2.125%18,881.25 168,881.25 08/01/2025 ----17,287.50 17,287.50 02/01/2026 --155,000.00 2.250%17,287.50 172,287.50 08/01/2026 ----15,543.75 15,543.75 02/01/2027 --155,000.00 2.250%15,543.75 170,543.75 08/01/2027 ----13,800.00 13,800.00 02/01/2028 --160,000.00 2.250%13,800.00 173,800.00 08/01/2028 ----12,000.00 12,000.00 02/01/2029 --165,000.00 2.500%12,000.00 177,000.00 08/01/2029 ----9,937.50 9,937.50 02/01/2030 --165,000.00 2.500%9,937.50 174,937.50 08/01/2030 ----7,875.00 7,875.00 02/01/2031 --170,000.00 3.000%7,875.00 177,875.00 08/01/2031 ----5,325.00 5,325.00 02/01/2032 --175,000.00 3.000%5,325.00 180,325.00 08/01/2032 ----2,700.00 2,700.00 02/01/2033 --180,000.00 3.000%2,700.00 182,700.00 Total $1,765,000.00 $1,765,000.00 $1,765,000.00 -$291,287.52 $2,056,287.52 Yield Statistics Base date for Avg. Life & Avg. Coupon Calculation 12/16/2021 Average Life 6.343 Years Average Coupon 2.6506379% Weighted Average Maturity (Par Basis) 6.343 Years Weighted Average Maturity (Original Price Basis) 6.343 Years Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 12/16/2021 Refunding Delivery Date 12/16/2021 2012C GO Bonds - CR File | SINGLE PURPOSE | 10/11/2021 | 11:23 AM City of Edina, Minnesota $1,820,000 G.O. Recreational Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2021C Current Ref 2012C GO Bonds Debt Service Comparison Date Total P+I Net New D/S Old Net D/S Savings 02/01/2022 -(2,077.70)-2,077.70 02/01/2023 180,140.31 180,140.31 188,743.76 8,603.45 02/01/2024 177,262.50 177,262.50 185,843.76 8,581.26 02/01/2025 176,542.50 176,542.50 187,762.50 11,220.00 02/01/2026 180,662.50 180,662.50 189,575.00 8,912.50 02/01/2027 174,507.50 174,507.50 186,087.50 11,580.00 02/01/2028 178,147.50 178,147.50 187,600.00 9,452.50 02/01/2029 181,497.50 181,497.50 189,000.00 7,502.50 02/01/2030 174,627.50 174,627.50 184,875.00 10,247.50 02/01/2031 177,647.50 177,647.50 185,750.00 8,102.50 02/01/2032 175,352.50 175,352.50 185,650.00 10,297.50 02/01/2033 177,887.50 177,887.50 185,400.00 7,512.50 Total $1,954,275.31 $1,952,197.61 $2,056,287.52 $104,089.91 PV Analysis Summary (Net to Net) Gross PV Debt Service Savings.....................92,934.65 Net PV Cashflow Savings @ 1.682%(AIC)............92,934.65 Contingency or Rounding Amount....................2,077.70 Net Present Value Benefit $95,012.35 Net PV Benefit / $1,922,612.73 PV Refunded Debt Service 4.942% Net PV Benefit / $1,765,000 Refunded Principal...5.383% Net PV Benefit / $1,820,000 Refunding Principal..5.220% Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 12/16/2021 Refunding Delivery Date 12/16/2021 Series 2021C GO Rec Ref B | Current Ref 2012C GO Bond | 10/11/2021 | 11:23 AM City of Edina, Minnesota $610,000 G.O. Recreational Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2021C Current Ref 2013B GO Bonds Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 12/16/2021 ----- 08/01/2022 --2,770.31 2,770.31 - 02/01/2023 85,000.00 0.400%2,216.25 87,216.25 89,986.56 08/01/2023 --2,046.25 2,046.25 - 02/01/2024 85,000.00 0.450%2,046.25 87,046.25 89,092.50 08/01/2024 --1,855.00 1,855.00 - 02/01/2025 85,000.00 0.550%1,855.00 86,855.00 88,710.00 08/01/2025 --1,621.25 1,621.25 - 02/01/2026 90,000.00 0.700%1,621.25 91,621.25 93,242.50 08/01/2026 --1,306.25 1,306.25 - 02/01/2027 85,000.00 0.850%1,306.25 86,306.25 87,612.50 08/01/2027 --945.00 945.00 - 02/01/2028 90,000.00 1.000%945.00 90,945.00 91,890.00 08/01/2028 --495.00 495.00 - 02/01/2029 90,000.00 1.100%495.00 90,495.00 90,990.00 Total $610,000.00 -$21,524.06 $631,524.06 - Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $2,541.25 Average Life 4.166 Years Average Coupon 0.8469871% Net Interest Cost (NIC)1.1350343% True Interest Cost (TIC)1.1420301% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 1.1199488% All Inclusive Cost (AIC)1.5729667% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 0.8469871% Weighted Average Maturity 4.166 Years Series 2021C GO Rec Ref B | Current Ref 2013B GO Bond | 10/11/2021 | 11:23 AM City of Edina, Minnesota $590,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013B Debt Service To Maturity And To Call Date Refunded Bonds D/S To Call Principal Coupon Interest Refunded D/S 12/16/2021 ------ 02/01/2022 590,000.00 590,000.00 ---- 08/01/2022 ----9,457.50 9,457.50 02/01/2023 --75,000.00 3.000%9,457.50 84,457.50 08/01/2023 ----8,332.50 8,332.50 02/01/2024 --80,000.00 3.000%8,332.50 88,332.50 08/01/2024 ----7,132.50 7,132.50 02/01/2025 --80,000.00 3.000%7,132.50 87,132.50 08/01/2025 ----5,932.50 5,932.50 02/01/2026 --85,000.00 3.000%5,932.50 90,932.50 08/01/2026 ----4,657.50 4,657.50 02/01/2027 --85,000.00 3.450%4,657.50 89,657.50 08/01/2027 ----3,191.25 3,191.25 02/01/2028 --90,000.00 3.450%3,191.25 93,191.25 08/01/2028 ----1,638.75 1,638.75 02/01/2029 --95,000.00 3.450%1,638.75 96,638.75 Total $590,000.00 $590,000.00 $590,000.00 -$80,685.00 $670,685.00 Yield Statistics Base date for Avg. Life & Avg. Coupon Calculation 12/16/2021 Average Life 4.269 Years Average Coupon 3.2972459% Weighted Average Maturity (Par Basis) 4.269 Years Weighted Average Maturity (Original Price Basis) 4.268 Years Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 12/16/2021 Refunding Delivery Date 12/16/2021 2013B GO Bonds - CR File | SINGLE PURPOSE | 10/11/2021 | 11:23 AM City of Edina, Minnesota $610,000 G.O. Recreational Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2021C Current Ref 2013B GO Bonds Debt Service Comparison Date Total P+I Net New D/S Old Net D/S Savings 02/01/2022 -(2,262.30)-2,262.30 02/01/2023 89,986.56 89,986.56 93,915.00 3,928.44 02/01/2024 89,092.50 89,092.50 96,665.00 7,572.50 02/01/2025 88,710.00 88,710.00 94,265.00 5,555.00 02/01/2026 93,242.50 93,242.50 96,865.00 3,622.50 02/01/2027 87,612.50 87,612.50 94,315.00 6,702.50 02/01/2028 91,890.00 91,890.00 96,382.50 4,492.50 02/01/2029 90,990.00 90,990.00 98,277.50 7,287.50 Total $631,524.06 $629,261.76 $670,685.00 $41,423.24 PV Analysis Summary (Net to Net) Gross PV Debt Service Savings.....................36,873.36 Net PV Cashflow Savings @ 1.573%(AIC)............36,873.36 Contingency or Rounding Amount....................2,262.30 Net Present Value Benefit $39,135.66 Net PV Benefit / $640,732.19 PV Refunded Debt Service 6.108% Net PV Benefit / $590,000 Refunded Principal...6.633% Net PV Benefit / $610,000 Refunding Principal..6.416% Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 12/16/2021 Refunding Delivery Date 12/16/2021 Series 2021C GO Rec Ref B | Current Ref 2013B GO Bond | 10/11/2021 | 11:23 AM Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.O. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Alisha McAndrews, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-95: Amending the Budget for the Year 2021 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No.2021-95 amending the budget for the year 2021. INTRODUCTION: The 2020 Annual Comprehensive Financial Review reported an unassigned fund balance in the General Fund of $4,503,106. Consistent with the fund balance policy, staff recommend the adoption of Resolution No. 2021-95 to amend the 2021 budget to transfer $4,203,106 from the General Fund to the Construction Fund; of this amount, $160,000 is allocated to the Southdale Streetscape Management P rogram. In addition, the budget is also amended to transfer from the General Fund to the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority $300,000 for housing assistance. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021: Amending the Budget for Year 2021 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-95 RESOLUTION AMENDING THE BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF EDINA FOR THE YEAR 2021 Whereas, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-120 Setting the 2021 Tax Levy and Adopting the 2021 Operating Budget on December 1, 2020. Whereas, the 2020 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report presented to the Council on June 15, 2021, reported an unassigned fund balance in the General Fund of $4,503,106. Whereas, the City’s goal is to maintain appropriate financial reserves in the General Fund, and the City Council has adopted a fund balance policy for the General Fund. The fund balance policy states that, to the extent possible, unassigned fund balance in the General Fund should be transferred to the Construction Fund to support capital improvements and equipment. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: The 2021 budget is amended to transfer from the General Fund to the Construction Fund $4,203,106; of this amount, $160,000 is allocated to the Southdale Streetscape Management Program. The 2021 budget is also amended to transfer from the General Fund to the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority $300,000 for housing assistance. Passed and adopted October 19, 2021. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 19, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 . City Clerk Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.P. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Ordinance No. 2021-10: Site Improvement Plan Agreement for 4911 77th Street West Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Grant Second Reading of Ordinance 2021-10 and approve the Site Improvement P lan Agreement. INTRODUCTION: On August 17, 2021, on first reading the City Council approved Ordinance 2021-10 revising the approved PUD, Planned Unit development, and approved the revised Overall Development Plan for the 200 unit apartment. T he plans have not changed since the original approval. The Site Improvement Plan Agreement was drafted by the City Attorney and been agreed to by the applicant. ATTACHMENTS: Description Ordinance No. 2021-10 Approved Resolution No. 2021-61 Approved Plans Site Improvement Plan Agreement (SIPA) Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX ORDINANCE NO. 2021-10 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO REVISE THE PUD-17, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-17 ZONING DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 36-507 Planned Unit Development District-17 (PUD-17) Pentagon Park South (a) Legal description: See attached Exhibit A (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans, including the master development plan for the site received by the City on January 17, 2019 except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2019-17 on file in the Office of the Planning Department. (c) Revised Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the revised plans for 4911 77th Street West as approved by City Council Resolution No. 2021-61 on file in the office of the Planning Department. (d) Principal Uses: All uses allowed in the MDD-6 Zoning District Multi-family Apartments/Condos. (e) Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the MDD-3-6 Zoning District. (f) Conditional Uses: All conditional uses allowed in the MDD-3-6 Zoning District. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 2 (g) Development Standards. (h) Signs shall be regulated per the Mixed Development District. (i) Ninety percent (90%) of the parking stalls within the development shall be available to all uses within the development. (j) Ten percent (10%) of the units must be provided for affordable housing for families or individuals earning 60% area median income (AMI) for the Twin Cities. Required Setbacks - Buildings 77th Street Computer Avenue Normandale Boulevard Viking Drive 15 feet 15 feet 50 feet 10 Feet Building Height 12 stories & 144 feet per the height overlay district Parking lot and drive aisle setback 20 feet Building Coverage 30% Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.5% Parking Stalls – Mixed Development District Phase 1 (Based on the uses) 602 stalls + 152 enclosed stalls for the residential use on Lot 3, Block 1 Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 3 First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2021-61 APPROVING AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO CHANGED THE USE AND APPROVED OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLANS INCLUDING REVISED FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IN THE PUD-17 ZONING DISTRICT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 The applicant is proposing an ordinance amendment to revise the previously approved plans for the Pentagon Park South (PUD-17) known as Pentagon Village, which was approved in 2019. 1.02 The applicants, Jay Scott, Solomon Real Estate and Rise Development, are proposing to develop the vacant lot in the southeast corner of the development, with a 6-story, 200-unit apartment. Ten percent (10%) of the units would be for affordable housing. 1.03 The overall development site in PUD-17 is 12.5 acres. The uses approved for the PUD include retail space, a 235-room hotel, a 153-room hotel, and a parking ramp in phase one; phase two included two 5-story office buildings, a parking ramp (expansion) and 19,000 square feet of office/retail. 1.04 The approved plans for the specific site we are looking at called for the development of the 5- story 153 room hotel. The proposal is to amend the Overall Development Plan to replace the hotel with a 200-unit apartment. 1.05 The property is legally described as follows: Lot 3, Block 1, Pentagon Village Hennepin County Minn. 1.06 To accommodate the request, the following is required: A Zoning Ordinance Amendment to change the use and approved development plans, including revised final site plan approval for this site within the existing PUD-17 District. 1.07 On May 26, 2021 after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. Motions to approve and deny the request failed on split votes. Vote: 4 Ayes and 4 Nays. 1.08 On July 21, 2021 the City Council approved the request. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-61 Page 2 Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses, and density are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The project is consistent with the following goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan: Encourage the development and maintenance of a range of housing options affordable to residents at all income levels and life stages. Seek opportunities to increase the supply of affordable housing, as well as to preserve the affordability of existing affordable housing. Facilitate the development of new housing that accommodates the needs of a people of diverse needs and from diverse backgrounds. A pedestrian-friendly environment. Support continued livability and high quality of life for all city residents by balancing goals and priorities for development, especially as the community responds to changes over time. Support the development of mixed-use districts that provide a variety of living opportunities within a walkable and livable area. Encourage infill and redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure, complement community context and character, and respond to needs at all stages of life. Primary uses in the OR, Office Residential category, which this site is located within are offices, attached or multifamily housing. Secondary uses: Limited retail and service uses (not including “big box" retail), limited industrial (fully enclosed), institutional uses, parks and open space. 3. The proposed use is allowed as a permitted principal use in the existing PUD-17 Zoning District. Residential uses are encouraged to activate the public spaces beyond the hours of 9 am to 5 pm. Residential housing would support the retail uses within the development and area. 4. The site plan is generally consistent with the approved site plan for the site. 5. The proposal includes the provision of 20 units within the development to be dedicated for affordable housing. The proposed project would help the City meet its affordable housing goals established with the Metropolitan Council of 1,804 new affordable housing units by the year 2030. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Zoning Ordinance Amendment to change the use and approved development plans, including revised final site plan approval for this site within the existing PUD-17 District. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans date stamped June 16, 2021, and the new plans submitted to the City Council at the public hearing. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-61 Page 3 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo and transportation planner dated July 9, 2021. 8. Compliance with the Wenck Consulting Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. 9. Subject to City Council approval of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment revising the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 10. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the fire marshal and building official’s memo dated July 2, 2021. 11. Hours of construction must be consistent with City Code. 12. Ten percent (10%) of the units must be provided for affordable housing for families or individuals earning 60% area median income (AMI) for the Twin Cities. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-61 Page 4 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on August 17, 2021. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 17, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2021. _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk BUILDING RENDER VIEW FROM THE NW PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 121-0068 development VIEW FROM THE NW PROJECT LOCATION PENTAGON VILLAGE - RENDER PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 221-0068 development MASTER PLAN UPDATE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED MASTER PLAN PROPOSED UPDATED MASTER PLAN FUTURE OFFICEDEVELOPMENT FUTURE RETAIL DEVELOPMENT FUTURE HOTEL DEVELOPMENT PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 321-0068 development MASTER PLAN UPDATE PROPOSED UPDATED MASTER PLAN FUTURE OFFICE DEVELOPMENT FUTURE HOTEL DEVELOPMENT FUTURE RETAIL DEVELOPMENT PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 421-0068 development EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS PLAZA ART INSTALLATION EXISTING COMMERICAL STRUCTURE PARKING STRUCTURE VIEW FROM PLAZA SITE ENTRY FROM NORTH PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 521-0068 development Viking Drive “Pentagon Village” Drive Computer AveSITE PLAN Urban Edge Park View Out & AboutEntry Plaza PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 621-0068 development PROPOSED PLANTING MATERIALS PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 721-0068 development BUILDING RENDER VIEW FROM THE NW PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 821-0068 development RENDERING VIEW FROM THE NE PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 921-0068 development RENDERING VIEW OF THE NW CORNER PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 1021-0068 development RENDERING VIEW OF THE NE CORNER PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 1121-0068 development RENDERING STREETSCAPE NORTH SIDE PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 1221-0068 development EXTERIOR MATERIALS PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 1321-0068 development Viking Drive “Pentagon Village” Drive Computer AveLobby Hobby Fitness BikesDog RunTrash Secure Parking MainEntry LEVEL 1 PLAN PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 1421-0068 development Viking Drive “Pentagon Village” Drive Computer AveClub Room Plaza Deck Over Parking LEVEL 2 PLAN PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 1521-0068 development MODULAR CONSTRUCTION PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 1621-0068 development SUSTAINABILITYMODULAR CONSTRUCTION • Reduction in construction waste compared to typical stick-built construction• Completing site and foundation work in parallel to modular manufacturing helps to reduce overall construction duration by 30% to 50% minimizing disruption to surrounding neighborhood.• Minimization of site disturbance during staging and construction ENERGY AND CARBON • Building will benchmark, report yearly energy consumption per the Efficient Building Benchmarking Ordinance (City of Edina)• Reduction in energy use through well-insulated building, inherent in modular construction• Utilize Xcel Energy’s Energy Design Assistance• Investigating Solar Viability, Solar Ready WATER AND WASTEWATER • Water conserving plumbing fixtures throughout• Efficient plumbing layout and design• Thoughtful storm water management PLACE AND ECOLOGY • Take into consideration how the landscaping can support the natural ecosystem • Drought tolerant landscape• Pollinator friendly landscape MATERIALS AND CIRCULARITY • Manage construction waste• Waste management plan for building• Potential for organics recycling / composting to be provided for residential units• Use of regional materials where possible EQUITY AND JUSTICE • 10% of residential units will be affordable• Interior, sheltered bicycle storage for residents• 5-10% Electric Vehicle Stations in place.• 50% EV ready with space allocated for 100%.• Car share program planned. PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 1721-0068 development RENDERING VIEW FROM THE NE PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS Edina, Minnesota July 29, 2021 | PAGE 1821-0068 development 217392v3 (reserved for recording information) SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT CITY OF EDINA 4911 WEST 77TH STREET THIS SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) dated October 19, 2021, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”) and EDINA APARTMENTS, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Developer”). 1. BACKGROUND. A. Developer has applied to redevelop Lot 3, Block 1, Pentagon Village, Hennepin County Minnesota (torrens COT 1474190), in the City of Edina, State of Minnesota (“Subject Property”). The Developer is seeking City approval to amend the Development Plan to construct a 6-story, 202-unit apartment complex, with ten (10%) of the units qualifying for affordable housing under the current City Affordable Housing Policy (the “Project”). B. The City has rezoned the Subject Property to Planned Unit Development (“PUD”). The Project is in accordance with the PUD. A Site Improvement Performance Agreement is required for the PUD. 217392v3 2. RIGHT TO PROCEED. On the Subject Property, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: (1) this Agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with both the City Clerk and the Hennepin County Registrar’s Office, and (2) the required insurance certificate has been received by the City. 3. PLANS. The Subject Property shall be developed in accordance with the following Plans which are on file with the City. The Plans shall not be attached to this Agreement. If the Plans vary from the written terms of this Agreement, those Plans approved by the City for issuance of the building permit shall control. The Plans are: Existing Conditions and Removal Plans dated June 16, 2021 prepared by Kimley Horn Site Plan dated June 16, 2021 prepared by Kimley Horn Final Development Plan dated June 16, 2021 prepared by Kimley Horn Utility Plans dated June 16, 2021 prepared by Kimley Horn Details Plan dated June 16, 2021 prepared by Kimley Horn Design and Building Plan dated July 29, 2021 prepared by Cunningham Arch. Final Landscape Plan dated June 16, 2021 prepared by Kimley Horn Sidewalk and Pedestrian Plan dated June 16, 2021 prepared by Kimley Horn Traffic Impact Study dated July 7, 2021 prepared by Wenck Associates The Developer may request changes to the Plans. For Plan changes deemed minor, pursuant to City ordinances, changes can be reviewed and approved by City staff. As of the date of this Agreement, City Staff review of minor Plan changes takes approximately three (3) business days from a Developer’s request for approval. All other Plan changes shall require approval by the City Council. 4. EROSION CONTROL. Prior to initiating construction, the Erosion Control Plan shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control obligations if they would be reasonable and beneficial. All areas disturbed by the grading operations shall be stabilized per the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 217392v3 (“MPCA”) Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity. Seed shall be in accordance with the City's current seeding specification, which may include temporary seed to provide ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the MPCA Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity or with the Erosion Control Plan or any schedule of supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within thirty (30) days of receipt of notice thereof, the City may draw on the letter of credit to pay any costs. No development or utility construction will be allowed on the Subject Property and no building permits will be issued for the Subject Property unless the Subject Property is in full compliance with the approved Erosion Control Plan. 5. LICENSE. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Subject Property to perform (a) all work permitted to be performed by the City under this Agreement, and (b) all inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site development. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer prior to entry. 6. CONSTRUCTION ACCESS. Construction traffic access and egress must be in accordance with the Construction Management Plan, which will be provided by the Developer and approved by the City prior to the commencement of construction. 217392v3 7. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY/HOURS. Grading, construction activity, and the use of power equipment are prohibited between the hours of 7 o’clock p.m. and 7 o’clock a.m. The City may, at the City’s discretion and at the Developer’s expense, have one or more City inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a part-time basis. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all instructions received from the City’s inspectors. The Developer’s engineer shall provide for on-site project management. The Developer’s engineer is responsible for design changes and contract administration between the Developer and the Developer’s contractor. The Developer or its engineer shall schedule a pre-construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. 8. DEWATERING. Due to the variable nature of groundwater levels and stormwater flows, it is the Developer’s responsibility to satisfy itself with regard to the elevation of groundwater and to perform any necessary dewatering and storm flow routing. All dewatering shall be in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. 9. CLEAN UP. Within 24 hours the Developer shall clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, subcontractors, their agents or assigns. Prior to any construction in the Subject Property, the Developer shall identify in writing a responsible party for erosion control, street cleaning, and street sweeping. 10. CITY ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION. The Developer shall pay for in-house engineering administration in the amount of One Thousand and no/100ths ($1,000.00) Dollars. City in-house engineering administration will include monitoring of construction observation, consultation with Developer and its engineer on status or problems regarding the Project, coordination for final inspection and 217392v3 acceptance, Project monitoring during the warranty period, final inspection and acceptance, and processing of requests for reduction in security. 11. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement, the Developer shall either deposit cash with the City or furnish the City with a letter of credit in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A (or some combination of cash and a letter of credit), from a bank in the total amount of one hundred thirty one thousand two hundred fifty dollars ($131,250) ("Security"). The bank issuing the letter of credit shall be subject to the approval of the City Manager and the bank shall be authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota. The City may draw down the security, on five (5) business days written notice to the Developer, for any violation of the terms of this Agreement or without notice if the security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City that the Project has been substantially completed in accordance with the Plans and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with City approval the security may be reduced from time to time by ninety percent (90%) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10%) of the security shall be retained as security until all Public Improvements (as defined in Section 12 K below) have been completed, all financial obligations to the City satisfied, the required "as constructed" plans have been received by the City, a warranty is provided, and the Public Improvements are accepted by the City Council. The City’s standard specifications for utility and street construction outline procedures for security reductions. 12. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. A. The Developer shall comply with the conditions outlined in City Council Resolution No. 2021-61. 217392v3 B. The Developer shall comply with the conditions outlined in the Director of Engineering’s memo dated July 9, 2021 and the Transportation Engineer’s memo dated July 9, 2021. C. The Developer shall comply with the conditions outlined and in the Fire Marshal and Building Official’s memo dated July 2, 2021. D. The Project is subject to City Council approval of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment revised the Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the Subject Property. E. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements pursuant to Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. F. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements pursuant City Code Section 36-1260 and receive City’s review and approval of such plan. G. Developer shall install code compliant bike racks near the building entrances. H. Developer’s installation of the roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened pursuant City Code Section 36-1459 and shall receive City’s review and approval of such plan. I. Developer shall obtain and submit to the City for approval a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit prior to issuance of a building permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District’s requirements. J. The Developer shall comply with the Wenck Consulting Traffic and Parking Study recommendations. K. The Developer shall provide the Security as outlined in Section 11 for for completing the required landscaping, screening, erosion control measures and the perimeter sidewalk around the Property along Computer Avenue and Viking Drive at the time of the first building permit (collectively referred to as the “Public Improvements”). 217392v3 L. Developer shall provide ten (10%) of the units in the Project to affordable housing for families or individuals earning 60% area median income (AMI) for the Twin Cities. M. Developer shall own and maintain the private sidewalk, identified on the Plans, and shall provide an easement to the City for the public’s use of the sidewalk. The City will not issue a temporary or permanent Certificate of Occupancy until the sidewalk is fully constructed and available for use. 13. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from Developer’s development of the site, except for costs incurred as a result of the City’s negligence or intentional misconduct. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including reasonable attorneys' fees, except for costs, damagers or expenses incurred as a result of the City’s negligence or intentional misconduct, occurring during Developer’s ownership of the Subject Property. B. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for undisputed obligations incurred under this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the undisputed bills are not paid on time, the City may halt site development and construction until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per year. 14. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City or the Developer under this Agreement. 217392v3 B. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including property conveyed to third parties. C. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Agreement. D. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. E. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer has fee title to the Subject Property or has obtained consents to this Agreement, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. F. The Developer and its contractors shall acquire public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of the Developer's work or the work of their subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for such insurance shall be in a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy on a primary and noncontributory basis, and the Developer and contractors shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage. The Developer and contractors must provide a Certificate of Insurance which meets the following requirements: 217392v3 1. The Description section of the Accord form needs to read “City of Edina is named as Additional Insured with respect to the General Liability and Auto Liability policies on a Primary and Non-Contributory Basis.” 2. Certificate Holder must be City of Edina. 3. Provide a copy of the policy endorsement showing City of Edina named as Additional Insured on a Primary and Non-Contributory Basis. These insurance coverages and the requirements hereunder shall be required until the Certificate of Completion is issued. G. The Developer and its general contractor shall obtain Workmen’s Compensation Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota, including Employer’s Liability Insurance, to the limit of $100,000 each accident. These insurance coverages and the requirements hereunder shall be required until the Certificate of Completion is issued. H. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. I. The Developer may not assign this Agreement without the written permission of the City Council prior to issuance of the Certificate of Completion. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells, the entire Subject Property, or any part of it. J. An uncured breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer and the failure to cure such breach within the period provided in this Agreement, including nonpayment of billings from the City, shall be grounds for denial of building permits and certificates of occupancy, and the halting of all work on the property. 217392v3 K. From time to time, when requested by Developer, the City shall execute and deliver a recordable certificate confirming the satisfaction or completion of certain requirements contained in this Agreement. 15. DEVELOPER’S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer, beyond the applicable notice and cure periods provided in this Agreement, as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any actual, out-of-pocket expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given written notice of the work in default and the opportunity to cure, not less than thirty (30) days in advance. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 16. NOTICE AND CURE PERIOD. If the Developer defaults in any manner under this Agreement and fails to cure such default within thirty (30) days after receiving written notice of the default from the City, the City may exercise one or more of the following remedies: (i) cure the default and charge the cost thereof including reasonable attorneys’ fees to the Developer which costs shall be payable upon demand; and (ii) institute an action for specific performance, injunctive relief, or any other remedy available at law or in equity. 17. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: Edina Apartments, LLC Attn: Jay Scott, ___________ 8560 Kelzer Pond Drive Victoria, MN 55386 217392v3 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: City of Edina Attn: City Manager Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424-1330 18. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION. After the Developer has received the final certificate of occupancy for the Improvements and completed the work required under this Agreement, the City Manager will issue a certificate of completion after written request from the Developer, unless denied as set forth below. The certificate of completion shall be consistent in form with the certificate of completion issued by the City and shall be in recordable form and may be recorded against the Subject Property. [Signature pages follow] 217392v3 CITY: CITY OF EDINA By: ____________________________________ James Hovland, Mayor And ___________________________________ Scott Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of _______________, 2021, by James Hovland and Scott Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager, of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ___________________________________ Notary Public 217392v3 DEVELOPER: EDINA APARTMENTS, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company. By: ____________________________________ Jay Scott, ______________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of _______________, 2021, by Jay Scott, the ___________________ of Edina Apartments, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. ___________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: 651-452-5000 DSK 217392v3 EXHIBIT A IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. ___________________ Date: _________________ TO: City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424-1330 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $____________, available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. __________, dated ________________, 2_____, of (Name of Bank) "; b) Be signed by the City Manager or Finance Director of the City of Edina. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) , on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2_____. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty- five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Edina Finance Director that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Edina City Manager, Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424-1330, and is actually received by the City Manager at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. BY: ____________________________________ Its ______________________________ 217392v3 FEE OWNER CONSENT TO SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT PENTAGON VILLAGE, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, fee owner of the Subject Property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Improvement Performance Agreement, affirms and consents to the provisions thereof and agrees to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply the Subject Property. Dated this _____ day of _________________, 2021. PENTAGON VILLAGE, LLC By: ____________________________________ ___________________________ [print name] Its _________________________ [title] STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of _______________, 2021, by ______________________, the _______________________ of Pentagon Village, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the entity. ________________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 DSK 217392v3 MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT OLD NATIONAL BANK, a national banking association, holds a Mortgage, Security Agreement, Fixture Financing Statement and Assignment of Leases and Rents (“Mortgage”) on the Subject Property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Improvement Performance Agreement, which Mortgage is dated May 7, 2019 and recorded May 8, 2019 with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles as document number T05600798, and is subject to the following amendments: 1. Amendment to Mortgage, Security Agreement, Fixture Financing Statement and Assignment of Leases and Rents dated July 25, 2019 and recorded July 25, 2019 with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles as document number T5629368; 2. Second Amendment to Mortgage, Security Agreement, Fixture Financing Statement and Assignment of Leases and Rents dated January 22, 2020 and recorded June 19, 2020 with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles as document number T5718889; and 3. Third Amendment to Mortgage, Security Agreement, Fixture Financing Statement and Assignment of Leases and Rents dated February 10, 2021 and recorded April 8, 2021 with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles as document number T5822742; Old National Bank agrees that the Site Improvement Performance Agreement shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its Mortgage and,/or Amendments. Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2021. OLD NATIONAL BANK By: ______________________________________ ____________________________[print name] Its ____________________________ [title] 217392v3 STATE OF ______________ ) )ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of __________, 2021, by ______________________________, the ______________________________ of Old National Bank, a national banking association, on behalf of the association. ________________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 DSK Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.Q. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-96 & Ordinance No. 2021-05: Site Improvement Plan Agreement, and Final Rezoning from PCD-3 to PUD at 4040 70th Street West Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2021-96 granting approval of the Final Rezoning, grant second reading of Ordinance No. 2021-05 establishing the PUD Zoning District for this site, and approve the Site Improvement Plan Agreement. INTRODUCTION: On June 15, 2021, the City Council granted Preliminary Approval of the project to build a 3-4 story, 118 unit apartment on the site. T he applicant has submitted final plans, which have not changed since the preliminary approval. As requested by the City Council, the applicant has staked to project on the site. The City Attorney has drafted the Site Improvement P lan agreement, which is acceptable to the applicant. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-96 Ordinance No. 2021-05 Final Plans Approved Preliminary Plans Site Improvement Plan Agreement (SIPA) RESOLUTION NO. 2021-96 APPROVING FINAL REZONING FROM PCD-3, PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO PUD-22, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT – 22, AND SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN AGREEMENT FOR 4040 WEST 70TH STREET BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 The applicant, Ecumen and Lupe Development Partners, are requesting a redevelopment of 4040 70th Street West to tear down the existing office building and construct a new three- four story 118 senior affordable housing project with 86 underground and 23 surface parking stalls. 1.02 The property is 1.58 acres in size. This site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as OR, Office Residential. The site has a height limit of 4 stories and 48 feet. The density proposed is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan/Southdale District Plan which limits the density to 75 units per acre for this site. 1.03 The property is legally described as follows: Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 1365, Hennepin County Minn. 1.04 To accommodate the request, the following is required: 1. A Rezoning from PCD-3, Planned Commercial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development, and 2. Preliminary Development Plan. 1.05 On May 12, 2021 after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the requests. Vote: 8 Ayes and 1 Nays. 1.06 On June 15, 2021 the City Council approved the request. 1.07 The city attorney has drafted the Site Improvement Plan Agreement, which is acceptable to the applicant as written. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: RESOLUTION NO. 2021-96 Page 2 1. Affordable housing is identified as a need in the Comprehensive Plan; and the proposed amendment would assist the City in meeting its established affordable housing goal with the Met Council of providing 1,804 new affordable housing units by the year 2030. This project would include 118 new affordable housing units toward that goal. 2. The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria for a PUD. 3. The proposed density of 75 units per acre is reasonable, and within the density range suggested in the Comprehensive Plan of between 20-75 units per acre. 4. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. Wenck Associates conducted a traffic impact study and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and the proposed parking. 5. Project would meet the following additional Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives: a) Encourage the development and maintenance of a range of housing options affordable to residents at all income levels and life stages. b) Support the development of a wide range of housing options to meet the diverse needs and preferences of the current and future Edina community. c) Encourage infill and redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure, complement community context and character, and respond to needs at all stages of life. 6. The project would provide a transition from the single-family residential district to the west to the Southdale commercial district to the east. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Final Rezoning from PCD-3, Planned Commercial District to PUD-22, Planned Unit Development District and Preliminary Development Plan and the Site Improvement Plan Agreement for 4040 West 70th Street. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The project shall be constructed consistent with approved Final Development Plans dated August 20, 2021. 2. Sustainable design. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicants Sustainability Questionnaire. 3. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the building official and fire marshal memo dated May 5, 2019. 4. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated May 6, 2019. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-96 Page 3 5. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the transportation planner’s memo dated May 6, 2019. 6. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. 7. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. 8. Final Rezoning is subject to approval of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment establishing the PUD-22, Planned Unit Development-22 District on this site. 9. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit prior to issuance of a building permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 10. A Site Improvement Performance Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 11. Compliance with the Wenck Traffic Study recommendations. 12. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of the first building permit. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on October 19, 2021. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) RESOLUTION NO. 2021-96 Page 4 CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 19, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2021. _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 2021-05 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD PUD-22, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-22, AT 4040 70th STREE WEST The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended to add the following: Sec. 36-505 Planned Unit Development District-22 (PUD-22) – 4040 70TH STREET WEST (a) Legal description: Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 1365 Hennepin County Minnesota. (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans, including the master development plan for the site received by the City on August 20, 2021 except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2021-96 on file in the Office of the Planning Department. (c) Principal Uses: All uses allowed in the PCD-3 Zoning District Multifamily Residential (d) Accessory Uses: (e) Conditional Uses: None Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX All accessory uses allowed in the PCD-3 Zoning District. All accessory uses allowed in the PCD-1 Zoning District 2 Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX (f) Development Standards. In addition to the development standards per the PCD- 3 Zoning District, the following shall apply: Required Building Setbacks Front – Valley View Front – 70th Street Side – North Rear – East 50 feet – Measured from the building to the face of the curb 40 feet – Measured from the building to the face of the curb 10 feet – Measured from the building to the lot line 10 feet – Measured from the building to the lot line Building Height 3-4 stories & 48 feet Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.5 Density (Southdale District Plan) 75 units per acre Parking 109 spaces proposed (g) Signs shall be regulated per the PCD-3 Zoning District for the retail uses, and PRD, for the residential uses. (h) The residential housing on the site shall include 118 units of senior affordable housing to meet the City’s definition of affordable housing. Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: 3 Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 19, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2021. City Clerk Lupe Development Partners (ECUMEN1' JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA FINAL REZONING JULY 30, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS Kinnley>>>Horn Expect More. Experience Better. PROJECT TEAM SHEET INDEX APPLICANT IS A JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN & LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP ECUMEN ARCHITECT 3530 LEXINGTON AVENUE NORTH, SHOREVIEW, MN 55126 POPE ARCHITECTS EXISTING SITE 01 EXISTING CONDITIONS & CONTEXT 02 CONTEXT PLAN CIVIL COVER SHEET ALTA SURVEY CITY OF EDINA CONTACT: ANNE STANFIELD, DIRECTOR OF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ANNESTANFIELD@ECUMEN.ORG 1 (651) 766-4320 1295 BANDANA BLVD N, SUITE 200, ST. PAUL, MN 55108 WARD ISAACSON, PRESIDENT— WISAACSON@POPEARCH.COM ARCHITECTURAL GENERAL NOTES DEMO PLAN AUG 2 0 2021 ZAC ROSENOW, ARCHITECT — ZROSENOW@POPEARCH.COM LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC 03 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN SITE PLAN 1701 MADISON STREET NE, SUITE 111, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413 CIVIL ENGINEER 04 PEDESTRIAN & TRANSIT CIRCULATION DIAGRAM GRADING PLAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONTACT: STEVE MINN, VICE PRESIDENT & CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER STEVE.MINN@LUPEDEVELOPMENT.COM I (612) 843-4069 KIMLEY-HORN 767 N EUSTIS ST SUITE 100, ST PAUL, MN 55114 05 FLOOR PLANS: LOWER LEVEL & LEVEL ONE UTILITY PLAN 00 BRIAN WURDEMAN, CIVIL ENGINEER — BRIAN.WURDEmAN@Kuvuy-HoRN.com 06 FLOOR PLANS: LEVEL TWO & LEVEL THREE LANDSCAPE PLAN 07 FLOOR PLANS: LEVEL FOUR & ROOF LANDSCAPE DETAILS COVER SHEET 08 ELEVATION DRAWINGS *NOTE: SCALE IS PRESERVED ONLY WHEN PRINTED AT 24X36. 09 EXTERIOR RENDERINGS 10 EXTERIOR MATERIALS Lupe Development Partners (ECUMEN‘ JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA FINAL REZONING JULY 30, 2021 POPE ARCIII T E C T S Kimley>>>Horn Expect More Experience Beller. CITY OF EDINA AUG 2 0 2021 NNING DEPARTMENT 01 EXISTING CONDITIONS & CONTEXT IECUMEN' Lupe Development Partners JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA FINAL REZONING JULY 30, 2021 POPE A R C H I TEC TS Kimley>>>Horn Expect More. Experience Better. CITY OF EDINA AUG 2 0 2021 LANNING DEPARTMENT NOT TO SCALE 02 CONTEXT PLAN RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD . BMO HARRIS SALON CONCEPTS BANK OF AMERICA ROCHE BOBOIS BREMER BANK KINDERBERRY HILL CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER SOUTHDALE ,PET HOSPITAL TD AMERITRADE ROOM & BOARD F.' I vi# i, • I I r RESTORATION HARDWARE & RH RESTAURANT ••• tj (ECUMEN' Lupe NE Development n Partners JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA FINAL REZONING JULY 30, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS Kimley>>>Horn Expect More. Experience Better. CITY OF EDINA AUG 2 0 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1"=20' 03 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN L DUIC5.41 SIAP 513:414.1.14 4/44FIVIEVI 4WD W. 70TH STREET RAIN GARDEN C.) 4:k"' „IV )j--I STAT TO U.G. PARKING Chlt1.1.4 ,4.11f5 41.17,4 MCC / / / / / / / / / / / / - / / \ COMMUNITY //it \ GARDENS \ </ 4;74 RAIN GAR COMMUNITY SCULPTURE vv \ \ \ J ART/COMMUNITY ROOM 000 000 [ STA R -li LANDSCAPE SCREENING \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Lupe Development Partners YECUMEN' JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA FINAL REZONING JULY 30, 2021 POPE ARC I I I T E C T S Kimley>>>Horn Expect More Experience Bette-. CITY OF EDINA AUG 2 0 2021 PEDESTRIAN & TRANSIT CIRCULATION PLANNING DEPARTMENT NOT TO SCALE 04 iov "gr", • BICYCLE CIRCULATION PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION O DISTANCE TO TRANSIT STOPS 70TH ST W & TARGET -- 0.4 MI FRANCE AVE S & 72ND ST -- 0.4 MI YORK AVE S & 69TH ST W -- 0.7 MI SOUTHDALE EXIT & YORK AVE -- 0.7 MI APARTMENTS Unit Type GSF 1st Poor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor 4th Floor TOTAL UnIt4 % of Total NRSF Al 1 BED 500 10 11 11 10 42 82% 21,000 A2 1 BED 600 8 12 12 7 39 23,400 A3 1 BED 750 3 6 5 2 16 12,000 01 2 BED 875 3 4 3 3 13 11,375 82 2 BED 1035 2 2 2 2 8 18% 8,280 TOTAL PER FLOOR 26 35 33 24 TOTAL UNITS 118 100% TOTAL UNIT S.F. 76,055 BUILDING GROSS S.F. Lower Level 1st Floor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor 4th Floor S.F. TOTAL 31,410 31,400 29,600 21,500 113,900 31,400 31,400 TOTAL BUILDING 145,300 CIRCULATION COMMON SPACE INDEPENDENT LIVING STORAGE L I SUPPORT SITE PARKING Type We TOTAL VEHICULAR SURFACE 23 UNDERGROUND 86 TOTAL PARKING STALLS 109 BICYCLE OUTDOORS (PUBLIC) TBD INDOORS (RESIDENT/PRNATE) TBD TOTAL BICYCLE RACKS 0 ECUMEN' Lupe Development Partners LOBBY / 1 BED ,BED 2BED BED STORAGE TOILET TOILET OFFICE1 WORK ROOM OFFICE4 I LOUNGE a a BOUNDARY PI:ZDIRENANCE OFFICE FITNESS ,BED BED BED ,BED BED 'BED 2BED 21313) ,BED 71UVAT I LOBBY BY I BED I BED 1 RES ,BED 2 BED 1 BED WATEW SPRINKLER POPE ARCHITECTS Kinnley>>>Horn Expect More. Experience Better. JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA FINAL REZONING JULY 30, 2021 CITY OF EDINA AUG 2 0 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1"=20' 05 LOWER LEVEL & LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLANS LOWER LEVEL PLAN LEVEL 1 PLAN BED 1 BED LEVEL 3 PLAN LEVEL 2 PLAN JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA FINAL REZONING JULY 30, 2021 METH XX .1111111 BED BED 1 1 BED 18E3 STORAGE 1 BED 2BED .ED 2 BED 1 BED I POPE ARCHITECTS Kimley))>Horn Expect More. Experience Better. CITY OF EDINA AUG 2 0 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1"=20' 06 LEVEL 2 & LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLANS 18E0 2BED 1 BED 1 BED 10E0 1 BED _STORAGE 15E0 2 BED STAIR 11 1 BED 2 BED 70 I 2BED BED 1 BED I BED 1 BED STORAGE 1 BED 1 BED 2BED STAIR ELEVATOR LOBBY 20E0 L 1 BED 2BED BED I 8E0 1 BED 1 BED SEED BED I BED I BED I BED 2 EEO BED 1 BED 10E0 GREET RCCF STORAGE BECK IN 2BED BED 1 BED 2BED 1 BED I BED 10ED I BED 1 BED CIRCULATION COMMON SPACE INDEPENDENT LIVING STORAGE SUPPORT (ECUMEIT Lupe Development Partners JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA FINAL REZONING JULY 30, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS Kimley>>>Horn Expect More. Experience Better. CITY OF EDINA AUG 2 0 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1"=20' 07 LEVEL 4 & ROOF FLOOR PLANS I ICED 10E0 BED ROOFTOP LOUNGE ICED STORAGE I BED 1 BED 10E0 RED ELEVATOR LOBBY MGM GEED I BED FEED ICED ROOFTCP ICED I OED I BED 2 BED 1 BED 1 BED 111ED ]GED - PADTOVOUNC SYSITH CIRCULATION COMMON SPACE INDEPENDENT LIVING STORAGE SUPPORT YECUMEN" Lupe Development Partners LEVEL 4 PLAN ROOF PLAN COMPOSTE WINDOWS/DOORS PREFINIST ED BALCONIES/RAILINGS I II II I • .. • "7- or / I FIBER CFMEN- I CCLOR-I FIBER CEMENT C.:D[0P 71 1:1 HHH I n WEST / 11 ME • • • • • • • • 1:11 11 11 MATERIALS - TOTAL BUILDING MATERIAL NAME MATERIAL AREA PERCENT of WALL MASONRY METAL FIBER CEMENT LAP GLASS 4,740 13,634 10,741 13,499 1 1.1% 32.0% 25.2% 31.7% TOTALS 42.614 100.0% SOUTH NORTH CITY OF EDINA AUG 2 0 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BASED ON 1/16" PERSPECTIVES 08 ELEVATIONS FIBER CEMENT CCLOR-I FIBER CEMENT COLOR-2 [IIII El ILI t'A (ECUMEN''' ,1-611) Lupe ri Development Partners JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS EAST ELEVATION MATERIAL NAME MATERIAL AREA PERCENT of WALL MASONRY 1,408 10.6% METAL 2,324 17.5% FIBER CEMENT LAP 4,724 35.5% GLASS 4.839 36.4% TOTALS 13,295 100.0% WEST ELEVATION MATERIAL NAME MATERIAL AREA PERCENT of WALL MASONRY 1,546 11.8% METAL 4,599 35.2% FIBER CEMENT LAP 2,837 21.7% GLASS 4,072 31.2% TOTALS 13,054 100.0% SOUTH ELEVATION MATERIAL NAME MATERIAL AREA PERCENT of WALL MASONRY 1,363 15.8% METAL 2,833 32.9% FIBER CEMENT LAP 1,934 22.5% GLASS 2,473 28.7% TOTALS 8,603 100.0% NORTH ELEVATION MATERIAL NAME MATERIAL AREA PERCENT of WALL MASONRY METAL FIBER CEMENT LAP GLASS 423 3,878 1.246 2,115 5.5% 50.6% 16.3% 27.6% TOTALS 7,662 100.0% MCl/AL r,,,,LL 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA FINAL REZONING JULY 30, 2021 POPE A R C H I T E C T S Koley0Horn Expect More. Experience Beller. n Ir IN • • II • IN • • III n HMO El] El I] III EAST 111 4,1 10 1,1 11 Li IP El Lir - • 111 ! • 1711 F1 ri ®I 17111171111 METAI STORE- - BEE cErAwl COLOR- • PIP n CCr 11 Lupe Development Partners YECUMEN• JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA FINAL REZONING JULY 30, 2021 POPE A R C H I T E C T S Kimlep)>Horn Expect More. Experience Better. CITY OF EDINA AUG 2 0 2021 LANNING DEPARTMENT AERIAL PERSPECTIVE LOOKING EAST 09.1 RENDERINGS PERSPECTIVE LOOKING EAST FROM VALLEY VIEW DRIVE Lupe Development Partners ).( ECU M E N' JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA FINAL REZONING JULY 30, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS Kimley>>>Horn Expect More. Experience Better. CITY OF EDINA AUG 2 0 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 09.2 RENDERINGS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA FINAL REZONING JULY 30, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS Kimlep)Horn Expect More. Experience Better. CITY OF EDINA AUG 2 0 2021 LANNING DEPARTMENT (ECUMEINI` Lupe Development Partners JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP PERSPECTIVE LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM VALLEY VIEW DRIVE 09.3 RENDERINGS Lupe Development Partners (ECUMEIT JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA FINAL REZONING JULY 30, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS Kimley>>>Horn Expect More. Experience Better. CITY OF EDINA AUG 2 0 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PERSPECTIVE LOOKING NORTH FROM W 70TH STREET 09.4 RENDERINGS DARK GRAY POWDERCOATED METAL PANEL STACKED, LIGHT COLORED STONE LIGHT WARM GRAY FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING (COLOR-1) MID-GRAY/BLUE FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING (COLOR-2) )(ECUMEN '"' Lupe Development Partners CITY OF EDINA FINAL REZONING JULY 30, 2021 POPE A R C H I T E C T S Kimley>>>Horn Expect More. Experience Better. CITY OF EDINA AUG 2 0 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA STOREFRONT, BLACK ANODIZED BLACK COMPOSITE WINDOWS SUNSHADE METAL BALCONIES ALUMINUM FRAMES AND PATIO DOORS POWDER COATED GRAY STEEL, POWDER COATED 10 EXTERIOR MATERIALS °SHER: CAPITOL CITY INIESTLIENTS ADDRESS: 1950 1081 STREET NEST PARCEL NR 3002824440003 ($00845V) SOU8'2.51V 329.94 BTU tI T4 SO 4. SCALE IN FEET FOUND IRON MONUMENT, AS NOTED SET IRON MONUMENT MARKED KITH LICENSE NUMBER 53536 FOUND PK NAIL • O REVISIONS DESCRIPTION FIELD BOOK PAGE FIELDWORK CHIEF: TV DATE NO. DRAWN BY* LS DRAWING NAME: 39551. dog CHECKED BY: CT JOB NO. 39551 FILE NO. 5458 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY NEM 1229 Tyler Street NE, Suite 100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413 PHONE: (612) 466-3300 FAX: (612) 466-3383 Egan, Field & Nowak, Inc. WWW.EFNSURVEY.COM cop YRIGHT © 2020 By EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC. land surveyors since 1872 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 4040 70th Street West Edina, Minnesota 55435 SHEET 'I OF 1 €20• (2) I AAIITh L.rfl V L./ (41 (17 vita '5\ \- \ '5\ 7 404070TH STREET WEST BRICK BUILDING FOOIPRPIT AREA=I0,442 SQUARE FEET) 8 'f 355 iJ II 0.• N 20 - OR Z ci) tLi tLJ I-. Lel (3 ,: SITE BS-NOM/ARK TOP HUT OF HYDRANT ELEP B7255 FT 6- CP (PER RAH). LEGEND "II BENCHMARK 5/ SANITARY MANHOLE O MANHCLE • STORM MANHOLE fill al® CATCH BASIN g ROOF DRAIN (OUTLET) • AUTO SPRINKLER 4 HYDRANT oSv SPRINKLER VALUE (E) ELECTRIC MANHOLE N GATE VALUE Qn HANDHOLE UGHT Yi UTILITY POLE O GAS METER - SIGN 6, HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACE tIP HANDICAPPED PARKING SIGN (151 PARKING COUNT SANITARY SEWER TC UNDERGROUND TELECOMMUNICATION WATERMAN UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC are OVERHEAD YORE UNDERGROUND GAS STORM SEWER 0 Mt SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING CONTOUR UNE 0.0Rox: TREE BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE WALL C6 E 861481\ 1E-8414 (W) Te858.0 (N5) ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY FOR: Kimley-Horn & Associates LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 1365, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Being Registered land as Is evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 1511530. GENERAL SURVEY NOTES: I. The orientation of this bearing system is based on the Hennepin County coordinate grid (NAD 83-2011 Ad)). 2. The legal description and easement information used In the preparation of this survey is based an the Commitment for Title Insurance prepared by Guaranty Commercial Title, Inc as agent for Old Republic Title Insurance Company, Commitment No. 65874 dated October 6, 2020. OPTIONAL TABLE A ITEMS: 1. Monuments have been placed at all major corners of the property described hereon. unless already mocked or referenced by existing monuments or witnesses in close proximity to the comer. 2. The address of the property described hereon I. 4040 70th Street West, Edina, Minnesota 55435. 3. The property described hereon lies within Flood Zone X per Federal Insurance Rate Mop No. 27053C0364F, doled November 4, 2016. 4. The total area of the property described hereon Is 68,634 square feel or 1.575132 acres. 5. The contours depicted hereon are per elevation dote collected while conducting the fieldwork. The contour interval is 1 foot. BENCHMARK: Top of Minnesota Department of Transportation Geodetic Monument 2733 0- GOD station I 95550 Ele.tion = 874.82 feet. (NAND 88) SITE BENCHMARK: Top nut of hydrant located on the south side of 70th Street West Elevation w 872.55 feet. (NAYS 88) 6a. No zoning report or letter was received from the Insurer pursuant to Optional Table A Item 6(a), os set forth in the 2016 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys. 7a. Exterior building dimensions are depicted hereon. 7t3T. The exterior building footprint areas at ground level is depicted hereon. 8. Substantial features observed In the process of conducting the fieldwork ore depicted here.. 9. As of the date of this survey the property desonbed hereon contains a tad of 78 visibly striped parking spaces of which 76 are standard spaces and 2 ore handicapped spaces. 10a. There ore no division Sr party walls an the property descnbed hereon. 11. Existing utilities, services and underground structures shown hereon were located either physically, from existing records made available to us, by resident testimony, or by locations provided by Gopher State One Call, per Ticket No. 210140753. However. lacking excavation. the exact location of underground features cannot be accurately, completely and reliably depicted. Where additional or more detailed 'information is required, the client is advised that excavation may benecessary. Other utilities and services may be present and verification and location of dl utilities and services should be obtained from the owners of the respective utilities prior to any design, planning or excavation. 13. The names of adjoining owners according to current tax records ore depicted hereon. 16. As of the date of this survey there Is no observable evidence of current earth moving work, building construction or building additions on the property described hereon. 17. The surveyor is unaware of any completed or proposed changes in street right-of-way lines. As of the date of this survey there is no observable evidence of recent street or sidewak construction or repairs that affect the property described hereon. 19. No plottable offsite easements or servitudes were disclosed In documents prodded to the surveyor. 20. Professional Liability Insurance policy obtained by the surveyor to be in effect throughout the contract term. SURVEY ITEMS PER SCHEDULE B: ITEM 5: Sanitary Sewer easement(s) over the Lana as shown on the recorded plat of South Office Park First Addition, and as shown on the recorded plot of Replat of Lot 2, Block 1, South Office Park First Addition. Sold Sonitary sewer easement affects the surveyed property and Is depicted hereon. ITEMS --SEWER EASEMENT PER PLAT OF SOUTH OFFICE PARK FIRST /loamy N 84, cal a., 1\'‘‘\\\\\\\\\‘‘‘‘\\\\\\""\\\‘‘\\N‘\\\\\\\\\\-\\-\\‘'l CITY OF EDINA AUG 2 0 2021 15 C Zkr"44,,. \ ri-i, i° ' ' ' ' ' ' ' . ' ' " 6.0 --------________ ,/,..--467---- ., RE-067.54 TRUNCATED-::.---- lC 1Ee8614 DORE RAW Rae RE-130036 ,..,•-•\ Ss 6 PlIt IE-847.8 (N) DS E-,847.7 (5) ---\................__ RE-867.79-, If-8613 (E) \ RE-869.65 E=866.2 (SW) fE=866. I (NE) PLANNING DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATION: To Lupe Development Fathers, LLC, a Minnesota limited Ilability company, end Ecumen, a Minnesota nal-profit corporation and Guaranty Commercial Title, Inc as agent for Old Republic Title Insurance Company. This Is to certify that this map or plot and the survey an which It is based were mode in accordance with the 2016 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes Items 1. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6(a), 7(0), 7(13)(1), 8, 9, 10(a), 10(b), 11, 13, 16. 17. 19 and 20 of Table A thereof. The fieldwork was completed on January 25, 2021. Date of Plot or Map: February 2, 2021 Christ er A. Terwedo Minnesota Ucense No. 53536 cterwedoOefnsurvey.corn NM =MI= EMI VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE SURVEY FOR: Kimley-Horn & Associates ARCHITECT POPE ARCHITECTS 1295 BANADANA BLVD N, SUITE 200 ST. PAUL, MN 55108 TELEPHONE: (651) 642-9200 NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE SITE MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS INCLUDED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. IF REPRODUCED, THE SCALES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON A 24x36 SHEET. 3. ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICES COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO ANNOUNCED BUILDING POSSESSION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICES. 4. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. E re K:\TWC_LDE \ALUPE DEVELOPMENT\Edina Multifamily \ 3 D EDINA MULTIFAMILY a L CU E! z 2 SHEET NUMBER C000 S rn SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR EDINA MULTIFAMILY SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 28N, RANGE 24W 4040 70TH STREET WEST EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN PROJECT TEAM: ENGINEER KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. KimleyHorn PREPARED BY: BRIAN M. WURDEMAN, P.E. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100 ST. PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE (651) 645-4197 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100 ST. PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE: (651) 645-4197 CONTACT: RYAN A. HYLLESTED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 1826 BUERKLE ROAD SAINT PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE: (651) 645-4197 CONTACT: STEVE MARTIN Sheet List Table Sheet Number Sheet Title C000 COVER SHEET V100 ALTA SURVEY C100 GENERAL NOTES C200 DEMO PLAN C300 TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERVATION PLAN C400 SITE PLAN C500 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C600 UTILITY PLAN L100 LANDSCAPE PLAN L101 LANDSCAPE DETAILS CITY OF EDINA AUG 2 0 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BENCHMARKS SITE BENCHMARKS: (LOCATIONS SHOWN ON SURVEY) SBM #1 TOP OF MNDOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "2733 Q" GSID STATION #95550 ELEVATION=874.82 (NAVO 88) SBM #2 TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 70TH STREET WEST ELEVATION=872.55 (NAVD 88) ngadijul OWNER / DEVELOPER LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 1701 MADISON ST NE, SUITE 111 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413 TELEPHONE: (612) 436-3200 SURVEYOR EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC. 1229 TYLER STREET NE SUITE 100 TELEPHONE: (612) 466-3300 FAX: (612) 466-3383 CONTACT: CHRISTOPHER A. TERWEDO NO TH 0 W 69TH STREET VICINITY N.T.S. SITE W 66TH STREET PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Know what's below. Call before you dig. \PlanSheets\V1 01 C1 a 13 PMENT1Edi a 5 a LEGEND Itt BENCHMARK • 5ANI-ARY LIA11110I.E (r) MANIIOLE o STOMA 001110LE Elm• CATCH BASIN gl ROOF DRAIN (CUTLET) is A1110 SPRINKLER • NITERANT sv SPRINKLER VALVE ID ELECTRIC LIANNOLE 3 GATE VALVE Ea Henna, * LIGHT O OTU, P3S 14 OAS METER SDN • HANCICATTED roweio 9,CE IC HANCICAFFED PARKING SEN 1151 PAINONC COAT SANITARY SEVER UNDERGROUND ELECONALINICATION 10,1ERMAN • UNDERGROUND ELECIR1C UVEhlicAU 0701 UNtettieettUNU tins 510811 SEVER 4;7 SPOT ELEVAITOS [0150710 COSTOUR LIC OUR* TREE rh BITUMINOUS SUR,ACE CONCRETE 9U07ACE cla t WALL 4030rollISIREErIVErr 00.(34.310010 msma. firIPAKT 41.4.10417 001113r F370 t-qr.ests. -9164 r-seao 1,119rhy RE.3701 1.-5031 09 lf.a665.0 (lan SITE 7011/ 5 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE 1 I S ;A 1:1 OarreO- CAYllak raly YiKSOIEWS YOORES5. 3350 ?Oral Saner KS: PAIRAL 010 3007112140303 (0000447 .501:18'25"W J29.94 111 91 TY t1) • Orr C a (PEP WOO 04. Fa. 1* IMMO SOOT EARD/OrT FM PLAT OF Sa.011 orrice PANS frsr MOM, -03E-037.0, ar.alf a (10.1 0.04 .3 (1) -•••••1111c--‘611 0 20 40 60 ml --mod I SCALL IN FEL I • MING IRIAN MONUMENT, AS .VGIEC O SFr IRON MONINFlir UARKFO MIH LICENSE NUMBER 53536 • FOUND PK NAIL ,3043 .(ra eeeeGd 00 ar-A 7n- RE,901.36 t61 0(.05006 le.016.3 E-5.53.0 a 1 cP 2 2 u) I-z uJ a 0 L z TJ lL „„I-r4 g Fie. in a EDINA MULTIFAMILY FIELD BOOK PAGE CHECKED BY: CT DRAWN BY: NO. DATE REVISIONS DESCR 7110N ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY FOR: Kimley-Horn & Associates LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 'rad 2. RegIstered Land Survey No. 365. Hennepin Co-AMA Mheeeeta. Bens Resisto cd laid u, 1. eidone.11.1 Cetiruato of ntle en 1511030. GENERAL SURVEY NOTES: I. The cnentotIon al Ns becalm, system -s bosell cn the liernepin Co-Ann, coordnate Lind f1.413 83-2011 A011 2. The nyul desciutlen un1 easement itromoLlo- us. in Oa presatution of lltke survey Is bused an the Cornmitmmt lue 1111e Somatic, 1430930 by 5u11snly Co-amerce.. Tele Ire as 03.00 kr (Id Repultti, Title Inearance Gornenny. Co-ragwort Ne. 05074 doted October 6. 2020. OPTIONAL TABLE A ITEMS: 1. Ifonornente has been pieced of dl major CO, .” of tee property demo-teed hereon anted dread, marked or referencec by exteting nonveleets or 00nesses n dose pecernIty to the corner. 2. hie lathes al hie amts.:fly des-tend Nuevo s 4040 700, Sited Meal, Eh-, Mit leturla E5435. 3. ,Tza,..ggrzeitz Imbed hereon les with* Flood Ira X per Federal 001073711 Rate Mop No. 2735300354F. dated 4. Ti. teld eters at the aroperte. descrbed he.101 h 60,614 square feet or ..37562 axes. 5. Tree Aspic. brew, we der eleystion LlAtu coll.-WA et So to-daunt, the Sehnert, 11.0 tuntot.. inte i,I FfediNARIN Top of ihnnesata Depoltment of Tranhaortation Geodetic Stronnent '7713 0' (51) Orden 9 95500 Eleraton - 874.62 feel. (WAD ea) DTE DENCINIAR1 Top nut 6.0 11 . 11. 2 eg Ir et. le4 , :lth e. e w eenth aide al 7Cth Street Neat 6e. No Amine repot! or baler was retched from the inure, pursuant to Octeoal Tolle A Item 6(a). as set Lath In the 2016 1.6ninnAne SIalderd (teen Rethirceents for Al-TA/115P5 Law roe Ourdp. he. Exterior bAlereg *root., are depleted hereon. 761 Tn. efetarior thtioeg footprint area. II grand level is depicted hereon SAbstantid fedoras observed in the process of conducting Ne fieldwork yoa depette hereat. 9. As of the date of ths surrey the property descriaed hereon contdrs a told of 78 Andy striped Dorking spaces of Ma, 76 o-e standard settees and 2 are handeopped scoots. Co Tore ore re fivhlen 10 party eats on the ptoperty ceeeribei Felton. 11. Existing atilt... services and underground structures Mown hereon *ere 'ocaled ehhar entsledly, from eristittg records mode mated. to us, or resident testimory, or by locations pocked by 3opher State Ore Cd, per Tleket 210140753. However. linens @scar:Mon. the slant (motion of underground features cannot be occuratel), complete!, old reliebly deptated. *no odditlood or more deteitel Infornotlen rogfireet, the oiler! la *dieted that eteamten moy be necessary. Other utities ord ser.eces may be present old verifIcallan ata location ot di unit.. and so-Nroes runt* be obtained front the owners of the respective utile. pie- to any fledge. pinning or excenetice. 13 Tea no-nee cf rejoining nano, ner_vefing '0 ranrent Int rororals are depleted harem ID. As of the dote of Ms surrey Were Is no deserted, endence at current earth nowt; Nark. bAlating cord/nation or bolting ad.:Chore on the property nesenbel 3crecrt. 17. rot '-.00:(1::"1,7:5`2,1'L:"L'IT,':',"V,,,.."1'5°°::::( 19. No donates tend easements a setetuSes were disclosed in comments prodded to the su101)or. 20. Proleshonal unblity Inaronce pollcy obtoned by the soneeny la be n effect throughout the contron term. SURVEY ITEMS PER SCHEDULE B: 11111 «":;'.tr7 .77,7-2.!52r;:r.15 144 ,ZZ of Lot 2, Block I, 5000, CIOca pond tricot AM0'an. Sod Sant, teed, easement anode the Neve,rd property end ic dep cled no-eon. CITY OF EDINA AUG 2 0 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATION: -0104Loate,r0.1140Cren,.....,t..%1,01:: Ire 01 00. 01.7;41$0: np,a)1. ott.d EcArnz, a Itlinresola ver-Poll eorporatior Ids Is to co-Iffy !het this mop or plat and the surrey on leech It b based eete mode le accordance with the 2016 Minintrro Stardorc Gene Recuitetnente far A:74,4 PS Land 110e Sandy,. jointly estabished and adopted by ALTA and MPS, ad Includes Items 1, 2. 3. 4, D, ft(o), 7(4 *XI), 4 9, 10;0, 10(1), 11, 13. 16, 17, 19 and 20 of Table A thereof. 'he tiettleork errs completed on henuary 25. 2021. Dote 11 1101 or Moo: Febfuary 2. 2021 Of ‘CX,A1 n A Teteed Ihneenta I know No. 535.15 elentedo•efnsurvey.e.orn DRAWING NAME: JOB NO. 39551 FILE NO. 5458 FIELDWORK CHIEF: Tv SURVEY FOR: Kimley-Horn & Associates PROPERTY ADDRESS: 4040 70th Street West Edina, Minnesota 55435 1229 Tyler Street NE. Suite 100 Minneapolis. Minnesota 55413 PHONE: (612) 4663300 FAX: (612) 466-3383 Egan, Field & Nowak, Inc: WWW.EFNSURVEY.COM CYPrRIGHT C' 2C20 BY EGAN. FOLD dr 74)055. NC Lund surveyors since 1072 SHEET) OFI z 0 to z IY 0 0 I- LL z SHEET NUMBER V100 NOT TO SCALE, FOR REFERENCE ONLY MCAMPlanSheets\C1-GENERAL NOTES.dwg July 28, 2021 - 5:59pm KATWCLDEV\ LUPE DEVELOPMENT\Edina Multifamily \3 D EDINA MULTIFAMILY GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE MN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION /STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION/ (LATEST EDITION) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE CONTENTS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK, AND, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM AS APPLICABLE TO THESE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FURNISHING ALL MATERIAL AND LABOR TO CONSTRUCT THE FACILITY AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROPRIATE APPROVING AUTHORITIES, SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB ALL AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, REMOVING TREES, STUMPS, ROOTS, MUCK, EXISTING PAVEMENT AND ALL OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL. 3. THE EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS QUALITY LEVEL /0" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CUACSE 38/02, ENTITLED STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF SUBSURFACE QUALITY DATA BY THE FHA. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE ENGINEER AT THE TIME OF THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. GUARANTEE IS NOT MADE THAT ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN OR THAT THE LOCATION OF THOSE SHOWN ARE ENTIRELY ACCURATE. FINDING THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF ANY EXISTING UTILITIES IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY AND SHALL BE DONE BEFORE COMMENCING ANY WORK IN THE VICINITY. FURTHERMORE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES DUE TO THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. THE OWNER OR ENGINEER WILL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES SUSTAINED OR COST INCURRED BECAUSE OF THE OPERATIONS IN THE VICINITY OF EXISTING UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES, NOR FOR TEMPORARY BRACING AND SHORING OF SAME. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO SHORE, BRACE, SWING OR RELOCATE A UTILITY, THE UTILITY COMPANY OR DEPARTMENT AFFECTED SHALL BE CONTACTED AND THEIR PERMISSION OBTAINED REGARDING THE METHOD TO USE FOR SUCH WORK 4. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES WHICH MAY HAVE BURIED OR AERIAL UTILITIES WITHIN OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION AREA BEFORE COMMENCING WORK THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 48 HOURS MINIMUM NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND BONDS IF REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES ONE COPY OF THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INCLUDING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND COPIES OF ANY REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS. 7. ANY DISCREPANCIES ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND ENGINEER BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. NO FIELD CHANGES OR DEVIATIONS FROM DESIGN ARE TO BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE OWNER AND NOTIFICATION TO THE ENGINEER. 8. ALL COPIES OF COMPACTION, CONCRETE AND OTHER REQUIRED TEST RESULTS ARE TO BE SENT TO THE OWNER DIRECTLY FROM THE TESTING AGENCY. 9 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTING AND MAINTAINING AS.BUILT INFORMATION WHICH SHALL BE RECORDED AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES OR AT THE COMPLETION OF APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION INTERVALS AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AS.BUILT DRAWINGS TO THE OWNER FOR THE PURPOSE OF CERTIFICATION TO JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES AS REQUIRED. ALL AS-BUILT DATA SHALL BE COLLECTED BY A STATE OF MN PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR WHOSE SERVICES ARE ENGAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 10. ANY WELLS DISCOVERED ON SITE THAT WILL HAVE NO USE MUST BE PLUGGED BY A LICENSED WELL DRILLING CONTRACTOR IN A MANNER APPROVED BY ALL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY WELL ABANDONMENT PERMITS REQUIRED. 11. ANY WELL DISCOVERED DURING EARTH MOVING OR EXCAVATION SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE APPROPRIATE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER DISCOVERY IS MADE. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THAT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS DO NOT CONFLICT WITH ANY KNOWN EXISTING OR OTHER PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. IF ANY CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PORTION OF THE SITE WORK THAT WOULD BE AFFECTED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY OWNER OF AN IDENTIFIABLE CONFLICT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH INSTALLATION RELIEVES OWNER OF ANY OBUGATION TO PAY FORA RELATED CHANGE ORDER. 13. SHOULD CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTER ANY DEBRIS LADEN SOIL STRUCTURES NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE DOCUMENTS, OR OTHER SOURCE OF POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION, THEY SHALL IMMEDIATELY CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER. EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE ALL MEASURES STATED ON THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN. AND IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION AS REQUIRED BY ALL JURISDICTIONS UNTIL NO LONGER REQUIRED FORA COMPLETED PHASE OF WORK OR FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CHECKED BY A CERTIFIED PERSON AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 7 CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE END OF A 0.5. RAINFALL EVENT, AND CLEANED AND REPAIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING, INLET PROTECTION DEVICES AND BARRIERS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED IF THEY SHOW SIGNS OF UNDERMINING, OR DETERIORATION. 1. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO SEE 'THAT A GOOD STAND IS MAINTAINED. AREAS SHOULD BE FERTILIZED, WATERED AND RESEEDED AS NEEDED. FOR MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS REFER TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2. SILT FENCES SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITIONS IF DAMAGED. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SILT FENCES WHEN IT REACHES ONE-THIRD THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE. 3. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE(S) SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOW OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING OF THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. 4. THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA SHALL BE KEPT IN GOOD CONDITION (SUITABLE FOR PARKING AND STORAGE). THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING OF THE TEMPORARY PARKING AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. 5. ALL MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SHALL BE DONE IN A TIMELY MANNER BUT IN NO CASE LATER THAN 2 CALENDAR DAYS FOLLOWING THE INSPECTION. TYPICAL OWNER/ENGINEER OBSERVATIONS CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWNER AND/OR ENGINEER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES: - PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING, SUBGRADE PREPARATION, BASE INSTALLATION ASPHALT INSTALLATION, UNDERGROUND PIPING AND UTILITIES INSTALLATION, INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURES, CHECK VALVES, HYDRANTS, METERS, ETC., SIDEWALK INSTALLATION, CONNECTIONS TO WATER AND SEWER MAINS, TESTS OF UTILITIES EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (*SWPPF”) IS COMPRISED OF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THE STANDARD DETAILS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE, ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SWPPP, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. 2. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN AND THE STATE OF MN NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT (NPDES PERMIT) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS. 3. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMRS) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OR MANUAL OF PRACTICE, AS APPLICABLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY THE PERMITTING AGENCY OR OWNER. 4. SITE ENTRY AND EXIT LOCATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION THAT WILL PREVENT THE TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ON A PUBLIC ROADWAY MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY, IT SHALL BE DONE IN AN AREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN. ALL FINES IMPOSED FOR DISCHARGING SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC AREAS SHALL BE PAID BY THE CONTRACTOR. 5. TEMPORARY SEEDING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS OF STABILIZATION SHALL BE INITIATED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE LAST DISTURBANCE ON ANY AREA OF THE SITE. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE CLEARING TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL PERMIT. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON PLAN THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA WHICH SHALL ALSO BE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING AREA, EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA, AND AREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES, OFFICE TRAILERS, AND TOILET FACILITIES. 8. ALL WASH WATER (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLE CLEANING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.) SHALL BE DETAINED AND PROPERLY TREATED OR DISPOSED. 9. SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON SITE OR READILY AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN-UP FUEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROL ON SITE. THE USE OF MOTOR OILS AND OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OPERATIONS IS PROHIBITED. 11. RUBBISH, TRASH, GARBAGE, LITTER, OR OTHER SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO SEALED CONTAINERS. MATERIALS SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM LEAVING THE PREMISES THROUGH THE ACTION OF WIND OR STORM WATER DISCHARGE INTO DRAINAGE DITCHES OR WATERS OF THE STATE. 12. ALL STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES PRESENTED ON THE PLAN SHALL BE INITIATED AS SOON AS IS PRACTICABLE 13. ALL STAGING AREAS, STOCKPILES, SPOILS, ETC. SHALL BE LOCATED SUCH THAT THEY WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT STORM WATER QUALITY. OTHERWISE, COVERING OR ENCIRCLING THESE AREAS WITH SOME PROTECTIVE MEASURE WILL BE NECESSARY. 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RE-ESTABLISHING ANY EROSION CONTROL DEVICE WHICH THEY DISTURB. EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE ESTABLISHED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES THAT MAY LEAD TO UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE OR STORM WATER POLLUTION, SEDIMENTATION, OR OTHER POLLUTANTS. UNAUTHORIZED POLLUTANTS INCLUDE (BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO) EXCESS CONCRETE DUMPING OR CONCRETE RESIDUE, PAINTS. SOLVENTS, GREASES, FUEL AND LUBRICANT OIL, PESTICIDES, AND ANY SOLID WASTE MATERIALS. 15. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ON THE PROJECT. 16. ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT. CHANGES ARE TO BE APPROVED BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER AND THE CITY OF EDINA ENGINEERING DIVISION. 17. IF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN AS APPROVED CANNOT CONTROL EROSION AND OFFSITE SEDIMENTATION FROM THE PROJECT, THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN WILL HAVE TO BE REVISED AND/OR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES WILL BE REQUIRED ON SITE. ANY REVISIONS TO THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN MADE BY THE CONTRACTOR MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PAVING AND STRIPING NOTES 1. ALL PAVING, CONSTRUCTION, MATERIALS, AND WORKMANSHIP WITHIN JURISDICTION'S RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL OR COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS (LATEST EDITION) OR MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS (LATEST EDITION) IF NOT COVERED BY LOCAL OR COUNTY REGULATIONS. 2. ALL SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (M.U.T.C.C) AND CITY STANDARDS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR FIRE LANES, ROADWAY LANES, PARKING STALLS, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOLS, ACCESS AISLES, STOP BARS ANO SIGNS, AND MISCELLANEOUS STRIPING WITHIN THE PARKING LOT AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 4. ALL EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL EXTEND THROUGH THE CURB. 5 THE MINIMUM LENGTH OF OFFSET JOINTS AT RADIUS POINTS SHALL BE 2 FEET. 6. ALL JOINTS, INCLUDING EXPANSION JOINTS WITH REMOVABLE TACK STRIPS, SHALL BE SEALED WITH JOINT SEALANT. 7. THE MATERIALS AND PROPERTIES OF ALL CONCRETE SHALL MEET THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN THE A.C.I. (AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE) MANUAL OF CONCRETE PRACTICE. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY A SECOND COATING OVER ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY OWNER FOLLOWED BY A COAT OF GLASS BEADS AS APPLICABLE PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 9. ANY EXISTING PAVEMENT, CURBS AND/OR SIDEWALKS DAMAGED OR REMOVED WILL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER AND OWNER. 10. BEFORE PLACING PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY SUITABLE ACCESSIBLE ROUTES (PER ADA). GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATEMATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2%. IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR ADA COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 11. MAXIMUM JOINT SPACING IS TWICE THE DEPTH OF THE CONCRETE PAVEMENT IN FEET. WATER STORM SEWER & SANITARY SEWER NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT GRAVITY SEWER LATERALS, MANHOLES, GRAVITY SEWER LINES, AND DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, MACHINERY, TOOLS. MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK IN FULL AND COMPLETE ACCORDANCE WITH THE SHOWN, DESCRIBED AND REASONABLY INTENDED REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 2. ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR UTILITY LOCATION AND COORDINATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NOTES CONTAINED IN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SECTION OF THIS SHEET. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL DISTURBED VEGETATION IN KIND, UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. 4. DEFLECTION OF PIPE JOINTS AND CURVATURE OF PIPE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. SECURELY CLOSE ALL OPEN ENDS OF PIPE AND FITTINGS WITH A WATERTIGHT PLUG WHEN WORK IS NOT IN PROGRESS. THE INTERIOR OF ALL PIPES SHALL BE CLEAN AND JOINT SURFACES WIPED CLEAN AND DRY AFTER THE PIPE HAS BEEN LOWERED INTO THE TRENCH. VALVES SHALL BE PLUMB AND LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE PLANS. 5. ALL PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE CAREFULLY STORED FOLLOWING MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THE COATING OR LINING IN ANY D.I. PIPE FITTINGS. ANY PIPE OR FITTING WHICH IS DAMAGED OR WHICH HAS FLAWS OR IMPERFECTIONS WHICH, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER OR OWNER, RENDERS IT UNFIT FOR USE, SHALL NOT BE USED. ANY PIPE NOT SATISFACTORY FOR USE SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED AND IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM THE JOB SITE, AND SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 6. WATER FOR FIRE FIGHTING SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO COMBUSTIBLES BEING BROUGHT ON SITE. 7. ALL UTILITY AND STORM DRAIN TRENCHES LOCATED UNDER AREAS TO RECEIVE PAVING SHALL BE COMPLETELY BACK FILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GOVERNING JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY'S SPECIFICATIONS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 8. UNDERGROUND LINES SHALL BE SURVEYED BY A STATE OF MN PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM, AT HIS OWN EXPENSE, ANY AND ALL TESTS REQUIRED BY THE SPECIFICATIONS AND/OR ANY AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. THESE TESTS MAY INCLUDE, BUT MAY NOT BE LIMITED TO, INFILTRATION AND EXFILTRATION, TELEVISION INSPECTION AND A MANDREL TEST ON GRAVITY SEWER. A COPY OF THE TEST RESULTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE UTILITY PROVIDER, OWNER AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY AS REQUIRED. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE OF 10' AND A VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 18' BETWEEN WATER AND SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES AND LINES. 11. IF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AS NECESSARY TO RETURN IT TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER. 12. ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED TO ASSURE CONNECTION AT STRUCTURE IS WATERTIGHT UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED BY CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 13. UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED IN CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, ALL STORM SEWER MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT, AND SHALL HAVE TRAFFIC BEARING RING 8 COVERS. MANHOLES IN UNPAVED AREAS SHALL BE 6' ABOVE FINISH GRADE. LIDS SHALL BE LABELED /STORM SEWER.. EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MEET THESE CONDITIONS AND THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE. 14. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY LAND SURVEYORS. IF THE CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. WITHOUT EXCEPTION, THEN THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY, AT THEIR EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW. 15. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. 16. ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH UNIFORM POURED MORTAR FROM INVERT IN TO INVERT OUT. 17. ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO STORM SEWER BY PREFABRICATED WYES OR AT STORM STRUCTURES. ROOF DRAINS AND TRUCK WELL DRAIN SHALL RUN AT A MINIMUM 1% SLOPE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, AND TIE IN AT THE CENTERLINE OF THE STORM MAIN. 18. ALL ROOF AND SANITARY SEWER DRAINS SHALL BE INSULATED IF 7' OF COVER CANNOT BE PROVIDED. 19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES THAT ARE TO REMAIN FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. 20. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND OTHER ABOVE AND BELOW-GRADE IMPROVEMENTS ARE APPROXIMATE AS SHOWN. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATIONS OF EACH PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 21 A MINIMUM OF 5' SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN UTILITIES AND TREES UNLESS A ROOT BARRIER IS UTILIZED. 22. GAS, PHONE AND ELECTRIC SERVICES SHOWN FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. DRY UTILITY COMPANIES MAY ALTER THE DESIGN LAYOUT DURING THEIR REVIEW. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE FINAL DESIGN AND INSTALLATION WITH UTILITY COMPANIES. 23. COORDINATE UTILITY INSTALLATION WITH IRRIGATION DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. 24. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FLOW LINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PERIMETER WALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO INSIDE WALL FACE. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT WALL WIDTH AND SPECIFICATIONS. 25. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS). FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS, AND MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS. 28. REFERENCE M.E.P. PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 27. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE STRUCTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS AND PAD PREPARATION SPECIFICATIONS. 28. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE M.E.P PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR LIGHT POLE WIRING. 3RD PARTY TEST REPORTS REQ'D TEST REPORTS REQUIRED FOR CLOSE OUT INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: -DENSITY TEST REPORTS - BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS OF WATER SYSTEM - PRESSURE TEST OF WATER/SEWER - LEAK TESTS ON SEWER SYSTEM AND GREASE TRAPS -ANY OTHER TESTING REQUIRED BY THE AGENCY/MUNICIPALITY O g A <T, GENERAL NOTES PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL VERIFY THE SUITABILITY OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS INCLUDING GRADES AND DIMENSIONS BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE THE SITE TO THE ELEVATIONS INDICATED AND SHALL ADJUST EMITS AS NECESSARY AND REGRADE WASHOUTS WHERE THEY OCCUR AFTER EVERY RAINFALL UNTIL A GRASS STAND IS WELL ESTABLISHED OR ADEQUATE STABILIZATION OCCURS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THERE IS POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS SO THAT SURFACE RUNOFF WILL DRAIN BY GRAVITY TO NEW OR EXISTING DRAINAGE OUTLETS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE NO PONDING OCCURS IN PAVED AREAS AND SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IF ANY GRADING DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND IN THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT OR UTILITIES. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL MANHOLE COVERS, VALVE COVERS, VAULT LIDS, FIRE HYDRANTS, POWER POLES, GUY WIRES, AND TELEPHONE BOXES THAT ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE AND UNDISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES TO REMAIN SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MATCH THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADES. 5. BACKFILL FOR UTILITY LINES SHALL BE PLACED PER DETAILS, STANDARDS, AND SPECIFICATIONS SO THAT THE UTILITY WILL BE STABLE. WHERE UTILITY LINES CROSS THE PARKING LOT. THE TOP 6 INCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED SIMILARLY TO THE REMAINDER OF THE LOT. UTILITY DITCHES SHALL BE VISUALLY INSPECTED DURING THE EXCAVATION PROCESS TO ENSURE THAT UNDESIRABLE FILL IS NOT USED. 6. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF 4' OF TOPSOIL AT COMPLETION OF WORK. ALL UNPAVED AREAS IN EXISTING RIGHTS-OF-WAY DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REGRADED AND SODDED. 7. AFTER PLACEMENT OF SUBGRADE AND PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL TEST AND OBSERVE PAVEMENT AREAS FOR EVIDENCE OF PONDING. ALL AREAS SHALL ADEQUATELY DRAIN TOWARDS THE INTENDED STRUCTURE TO CONVEY STORM RUNOFF. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY OWNER AND ENGINEER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE DISCOVERED. 8. WHERE EXISTING PAVEMENT IS INDICATED TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAW CUT FULL DEPTH FOR A SMOOTH AND STRAIGHT JOINT AND REPLACE THE PAVEMENT WITH THE SAME TYPE AND DEPTH OF MATERIAL AS EXISTING OR AS INDICATED. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL PROTECTION OVER ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT BY THE OWNER. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE CLEANED OF DEBRIS AS REQUIRED DURING AND AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE FLOWS. 10. IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ANY APPLICABLE REQUIRED PERMITS. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH THE OWNER AND THE DESIGN ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 11 FIELD DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN AT INTERVALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY OR TO MN/DOT STANDARDS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 12. ALL SLOPES AND AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE GRADED AS PER PLANS. THE AREAS SHALL THEN BE SODDED OR SEEDED AS SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS, FERTILIZED, MULCHED, WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL HARDY GRASS GROWTH IS ESTABLISHED IN ALL AREAS. ANY AREAS DISTURBED FOR ANY REASON PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE JOB SHALL BE CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER ALL EARTHEN AREAS WILL BE SODDED OR SEEDED AND MULCHED AS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPING PLAN. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL OF DUST AND DIRT RISING AND SCATTERING IN THE AIR DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL PROVIDE WATER SPRINKLING OR OTHER SUITABLE METHODS OF CONTROL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. 14. SOD, WHERE CALLED FOR, MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED ON EXPOSED SLOPES WITHIN 48 HOURS OF COMPLETING FINAL GRADING, AND AT ANY OTHER TIME AS NECESSARY, TO PREVENT EROSION, SEDIMENTATION OR TURBID DISCHARGES. 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT LANDSCAPE ISLAND PLANTING AREAS AND OTHER PLANTING AREAS ARE NOT COMPACTED AND DO NOT CONTAIN ROAD BASE MATERIALS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO EXCAVATE AND REMOVE ALL UNDESIRABLE MATERIAL FROM ALL AREAS ON THE SITE TO BE PLANTED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF IN A LEGAL MANNER. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL UNDERGROUND STORM WATER PIPING PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND MN/DOT SPECIFICATION. 17. ALL CONCRETE/ASPHALT SHALL BE INSTALLED PER GEOTECH REPORT, CITY OF EDINA AND MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. 18. SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO FLOWLINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 19. LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ARE TO THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON THE PLAN. 20. IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. 21. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND PROTECTING EXISTING UTILITIES, AND SHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES THAT OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT COMPENSATION. 22. BLEND NEW EARTHWORK SMOOTHLY TO TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING GRADE. 23. ALL PROPOSED GRADES ONSITE SHALL BE 3:1 OR FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. ANY SLOPES STEEPER THAN 4:1 REQUIRE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BLANKET. 24. ADHERE TO ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS NECESSARY IN THE GENERAL N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT AND STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGE ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 25. ADJUST AND/OR CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO ASSURE A SMOOTH FIT AND CONTINUOUS GRADE. 28. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE MINIMUM GRADES ARE MET WITHIN PAVED AREAS, 1.2% FOR ASPHALT PAVING AND 0.6% FOR CONCRETE PAVING. CITY OF EDINA AUG 202 021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT NO. B2100387 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 1101 HAMPSHIRE AVENUE S MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55438 DATED 4/02./2021 SHEET NUMBER C100 DEMOLITION PLAN NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSAL (IN A LOCATION APPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES) ALL STRUCTURES, PADS. WALLS, FLUMES. FOUNDATIONS, PARKING. DRIVES. DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC. SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PLANS CAN BE CONSTRUCTED. ALL FACILITIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLE MATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE MID DISPOSING THE DEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PERMIT AND RECEIPTS OF DISPOSAL OF MATERIALS TO THE OWNER AND OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL UTILITY SERVICES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES. UTILITY SERVICES SHALL NOT BE INTERRUPTED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND COORDINATION WTH THE AI AcFNT PROPERTIES ANDADR THE CITY. 4. DIE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL ANDOR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY COMPANYS FORCES MID ANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO THE UTIUTY COMPANY FOR THEIR SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES. PROPOSED SAWCUT LINE (TYP.) ASPHALT EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN MAD BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OF 01896'N = DISTURBANCE (TYP.) TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) ,44'1(--/V cl,r7cri4C4f//-74-hi- l'iTL/W--/' - CURB REMOVAL (TYP.) DUSTING TREES TO REMAIN AND SE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED SAWCUT UNE (TSP.) RESIDUE EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKI IGS TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) . REMOVE DUSTIN SIGNAGE 5. THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE ANO ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACCURACY. PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE UTILITY COMPANIES FOR LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ALL AREAS OF PROPOSED WORK B. ALL EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACT LOCATION, OR AS ANY OBSTACLES THAT MAY OCCUR ON THE SITE. VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY ANTICIPATED FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING DESTRUCTION MD REMOVAL OF ALL SERVICE LINES AND CAP ALL LINES BEFORE PRECEDING WITH THE WORK 7. ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC, AND/OR GAS LINES NEEDING TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SEWAGE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ANY ROAD FUGHT.OF.WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION. B. CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBUC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES, ENCLOSURES, ETC. (AND OTHERAPPRCPRIATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES) AS APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE COORDINATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH EDINA, <COUNTY> COUNTY ARO MILOOT. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ACCESS TO ALL ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION, MID SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTIES IF ACCESS WILL BE INTERRUPTED OR ALTERED AT ANY TIME DURING CONSTRUCTION. IS. PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OCCURRING, ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED. 11. CONTRACTOR MAY LIMIT SAW-CUT AND PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHERE IT IS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS INCURRED ON ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS REMOVAL MID REPAIR. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WATER MAIN WORK WITH THE FIRE DEPT. AND THE CITY WATER DEPARTMENT TO PLAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ARD TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION IS CCNSTANTLY AVAILABLE TO THE SITE THROUGHOUT THIS SPECIFIC WORK AND THROUGH ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING/PROVIDING ANY REQUIRED WATER &INN SHUT OFFS YAM THE CITY OF EDINA DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL BE PROVIDED. 13. REFER TO SURVEY FOR ALL EXISTING INVERT ANO RIM ELEVATIONS. 14. ALL (DAMES SHOWN ARE DUSTING UTILITIES. 15. IN THE EVENT A WELL IS FOUND, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER IMMEDIATELY. ALL WELLS SHALL BE SEALED BY A LICENSED WELL CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE OF MN REQUIREMENTS. 16. IN THE EVENT THAT UNKNOWN CONTAINERS OR TANKS ARE ENCOUNTERED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE OWNER ANDADR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY. ALL CONTAINERS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF ATA PERMITTED LANDFILL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF ANY EXISTING DRAINTILE IS ENCOUNTERED ON SITE NO ACTIVE DRAWEE SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER. LEGEND //I III .///m/hX viii • x.x.x.x.x...x • . 0.0,0,0,® • UNITS OF CONSTRUCTION EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE FASTING CHAINLINK FENCE DUSTING JRARRER EXISTING RETAINING WALL DUSTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATER/ANN OUSTING GAS MAIN EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING CURB & GUTTER DUSTING SIGN EXISTING FLARED END SECTION EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING STOMA CATCHBASIN EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING POST INDICATOR VALVE EXISTING WELL EXISTING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER EXISTING ROOF DRAIN EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HYDRANT EXISTING METAL COVER EXISTING ELECTRICAL METER DUSTING AIR CONDITIONER EXISTING TELEPHONE ARMHOLE EXISTING CABLE BOX EXISTING GUY WIRE EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING LIGHT POLE DUSTING TREE EXISTING TREE UNE GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 10 20 40 11 I PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION .,110.111111,..111 0-ELC medzeisromardozzreAs. GAS TEL C1V PROPERTY LINE REMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACE REMOVE CONCRETE SURFACE REMOVE BUILDING CLEARING & GRUBBING FULL DEPTH SAWCUT REMOVE TREE REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE UTILITY LINES FILL & ABANDON UTILITY LINES /. REMOVAL „ ....... • • . • • URB REMOVAL (TYP.) CURB REMOVAL (TYP) TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) _ 11 - TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) REMOVE DUSTING UGHT POLE REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE RB REMOVAL (TYP.) 0 REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS , ....... / TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) / CURD REMOVAL (TVP.) N TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) ASPHALT REMOVAL CURB REMOVAL (TYP.) EXISTING UTILITIES TO BE REMOVED REMOVE STAIRS AND RAJUNG \ EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ,-. TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) 44, CONCRETE REMOVAL UNITS OF DISTURBANCE (TYP.) PROPOSED SAWCUT LINE I DYP.) 1 C ( 9 41* • s 4 $ V s SEWER EASEMENT _ AM, - DISTURBANCE 1- DUSTING SANITARY ' EXISTING STORM SEWER TO 0111,-1/ (TYP.) - EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN - - AND BE PROTECTED - THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTOR III III III IB IK \ III III 111 ((I \-1 CONCRETE REMOVAL LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (TSP.) <5 A ", / / e . . . REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS REMOVE DUSTING . , GAS METER CLEAR AND REMOVE EXISTING TYP.)i TRANSFORMER + 4 4 4 i ) •4• ., \ & • • • 'd :.1 V.' REMOVE EXISTING TO BE REMOVED PCtE4C DUSTING RETAINING WALL miff ...1tA -.V)..1),_ kh... , / . 4 C 0 Ailliir OVE rS TAIR i M fi . -l " -RAM - REMOVE EXISTING =-,.1-- -,1- -_ J , SPRINKLER SYSTEM - ,, ,,, TWO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SERVICES TO BE CAPPED AT MAR PROPOSED SAWCUT LINE (TM.) MOTS OF DISTURBANCE (TYP.) EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION \\\ TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) I TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA AUG 2 0 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) D t). CONCRETE REMOVAL PROPOSED . SAWCUT LINE (TYP.) LIMITS OF , DISTURBANCE (TYP.) s /1/ '/' //r irr ('r ir Ili/ ill Ili If . ii EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN III 6i 1, I; AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION -_ if, „,. ,„„, If; ...::'jc I Iii ,III '. i'l--T-- P A I II; III ,\ CONCRETE li I _ _,1 I , REMOVAL P/ / 1! III 1,I /0 ,.... i ik, III , - I II( [1' I n I /// I '--_---!.i (/, / ri q; LI A /6( /,',1-=',4 i',, ASPHALT . „ CLEAR AND GRUB (TYP.) THREC'Zil AND UT E P:TDRT EC T ECII?4 ((\ DUSTING PEDESTRIAN RAMP PROTECTED THROUGHOUT TO REMAIN AND BE I. DISTURBANCE (TYP.) LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION 11 - 'I 1--7.7.-/--::...„7- — - — _,/iI -'-'--; .- - - — — —..., -a . - ........ EXISTING STORM SEWER TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS ........ ” - - 70TH STREET WEST (80 FOOT HIDE POWO RION T OF MO) ASPHALT REMOVAL CLEAR AND GRUB (TYP.) /;D CLEAR AN, GRUB (TYP.) -1/1- REMOVE EXISTI SIGNAGE REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) — - - - -N REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT !PRICINGS DUSTING PEDESTRIAN RAMP TO REMAIN AND BE E PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION \I'I lI __ • V \ ..1,11 I A PROPOSED SAWCUT UNE (TYP.) o 11 I II; /1 ///,' N _ EDINA MULTIFAMILY SHEET NUM11BER C200 E io CN nSheets\C2-DEMO PLAN.dwg ATWCLDEV \LUPE DEVELOPMENT\Edina Mu K: \TWC_LDEV \ LUPE DEVELOPMENTEdina Multifamily\3 Design \ CAD \PlanSheets Ll-TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERVATION PLAN.dwg July 28, 2021 - 6:00pm 0 PREPARED FOR EDINA MULTIFAMILY • Z O ° Z < z > Z :1 Z "ct LLJ 0_ C/) LU w w CC SHEET NUMBER C300 LEGEND O EXISTING TREE TO BE SAVED (TYP.) BO EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) 0 LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (TYP.) O TREE PROTECTION FENCE (SEE DETAIL) (TYP.) TAG # SPECIES CAL IN./ HT. STATUS REQUIRES REPLACEMENT 1 DECIDUOUS 18 IN. REMOVED YES 2 DECIDUOUS 8 IN. REMOVED NO 3 DECIDUOUS 24 IN. REMOVED NO 4 DECIDUOUS 121N. REMOVED NO 5 DECIDUOUS 10 IN. REMOVED NO 6 DECIDUOUS 14 IN. REMOVED NO 7 DECIDUOUS 14 IN. REMOVED NO 8 DECIDUOUS 24 IN. REMOVED NO 9 DECIDUOUS 24 IN. REMOVED NO 10 DECIDUOUS 15IN. REMOVED NO 11 DECIDUOUS 18 IN. REMOVED NO 12 DECIDUOUS 151N. REMOVED NO 13 DECIDUOUS 15 IN. REMOVED NO 14 DECIDUOUS 241N. REMOVED NO 15 DECIDUOUS 15 IN. REMOVED NO 16 DECIDUOUS 24 IN. SAVED NO 17 DECIDUOUS 20 IN. REMOVED NO 18 DECIDUOUS 14 IN. REMOVED NO 19 DECIDUOUS 151N. REMOVED YES NOTE: ONLY SIGNIFICANT TREES IN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SHOWN ON PLAN/ INVENTORY. 0 TEMPORARY TREE PROTECTION FENCE PLACEMENT SCALE: N.T.S. C300 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA AUG 2 0 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 70TH STREET WEST (BO FOor WOE PUBLIC BMW Or WAY) - - --= PROPERTY LINE CSr TREE TO REMAIN X TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING VEGETATION EDGE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION TREE PROTECTION FENCE TREE MITIGATION DATA PROTECTED TREE REMOVAL: 18 TREES PROTECTED TREE MITIGATION REQUIRED: 2 TREES PROTECTED TREES MAY BE REMOVED WITHOUT MITIGATION WITHIN 10 FOOT RADIUS OF BUILDING PAD, DECK OR PATIO OF A NEW OR REMODELED BUILDING, WITHIN 5 FOOT RADIUS OF DRIVEWAYS AND PARKING AREAS, WITHIN 10 FOOT RADIUS OF INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS. PROTECTED TREES MUST BE REPLACED WITH ONE TREE OF SIMILAR SPECIES. TREE PROTECTION NOTES 1. PRUNING WILL BE DONE BY PROFESSIONALS DURING APPROPRIATE PRUNING SEASON. 2. NO STORAGE OF MATERIALS. OPERATION OF MACHINERY, OR DEVELOPMENT OF ANY SORT WILL OCCUR WITHIN THE FENCE-LINE WITHOUT APPROVAL IN WRITING FROM CITY. 3. SITE GRADING TO BE DONE ONLY AFTER PROTECTIVE MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN, CITY HAS APPROVED FENCING LOCATIONS, AND ALL CONTRACTORS HAVE BEEN BREIFED ON TREE PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES. 4. EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN OR REMOVED TO BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED, WITHIN DISTURBANCE LIMITS AND 10' OUTSIDE OF THE DISTURBANCE LIMITS. 5. TREE PRESERVATION TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER AND PER LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY. KEYNOTE LEGEND DRIP LINE CONSTRUCTION LIMIT TREE PROTECTION SIGN FURNISH AND INSTALL TEMPORARY FENCE AT THE TREE'S DRIPLINE OR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AS SPECIFIED, PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. WHEN POSSIBLE PLACE FENCE 25 FEET BEYOND THE DRIP LINE. PLACE PROTECTION SIGNS ALONG FENCE AT 20' INTERVALS. = KATWC_LDEV \ LUPE DEVELOPMENTEdina Multifamily \ 3 Design \ CAMPlanSheets C4-SITE PLAN.dwg July 28, 2021 - 6:00pm E " 2 I- z LLI 2 (1) LL p" n NN 2 o L>Z PA- g -J EDINA MULTIFAMILY SHEET NUMBER C400 KEYNOTE LEGEND LEGEND PROPERTY UNE PROPOSED FENCE SETBACK LINE RETAINING WALL PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED STORAIWATER MANAGEMENT AREA PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPERTY SUMMARY EDINA MULTIFAMILY TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 68,638 SF (1.67 AC) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 48,658 SF (1.11 AC) PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 19,980 SF (0.46 AC) TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 68,634 SF (1.57 AC) ZONING SUMMARY 1 EXISTING ZONING PCD-3 (PLANNED COMMERCIAL) PROPOSED ZONING PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) PARKING SETBACKS ROAD = 10' BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT = 35 SIDE = 10' REAR = 10' BUILDING DATA SUMMARY AREAS PROPOSED PROPERTY 68,634 SF (1.57 AC) BUILDING AREA 31,446 SF (45.8% OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA) _ PARKING REQUIRED PARKING I SPACE/4 RESIDENTS BASED ON MAXIMUM CAPACITY OF THE BUILDING, PLUS ONE SPACE/EMPLOYEE ON THE MAJOR SHIFT, PLUS ONE SPACE PER VEHICLE OWNED BY THE BUILDING'S MANAGEMENT PROPOSED SURFACE PARKING 24 STALLS PROPOSED UNDERGROUND PARKING 86 STALLS SURFACE ADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED 1 STALLS / 1 STALLS UNDERGROUND ADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED 4 STALLS / 4 STALLS SITE PLAN NOTES ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS MD CODES AND 0.511A STANDARDS. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS MD DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT PORCHES. TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS MID EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. 3. ALL INNER CURSED RADII ARE TO BE 3' AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE ID UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE T. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TOME FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PIANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS. TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY. UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION AMEN FROM A SURVEY BY EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK INC., DATED 02/0212021. MLEY.HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR OMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. B. TOTAL LMS AREA IS 1.57 ACRES. PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARE SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZE. LOCATION MD ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON I MONUMENT SIGN. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 11. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE MID UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE 12. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL FLANS FOR DUMP STER ENCLOSURE DETAILS. 13. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS. 14. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 15. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. 15. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BEP IN WIDTH AND IS IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE IMPACTS TO PEDESTRIANS BY SEQUENCING REPLACEMENT (TEMPORARY 011 PERMANENT) OF THE SIDEWALK WITHIN 48 HOURS OF REMOVAL. MAINTAIN ACCESS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 10 20 40 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 0 CONCRETE SIDEWALK ® IT CONCRETE FILLED PIPE BOLLARD • MATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB U GUTTER 10 ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP O ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN 10 ACCESSIBLE PARKING O AREA STRIPED WITH 4' SYSL 45' 2. O.C. OH STANDARD DITTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT OI LANDSCAPE AREA- SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS OJ TRUNCATED DOME RAMP O HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT 0 B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.) OM TRANSITION CURB ON FLAT CURB O 4' ALUMINUM PICKET FENCE O CONCRETE PAVEMENT O PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK 10. BUILDING SETBACK 10. PARKING SETBACK 7 STAIRS AND ASSOCIATE RAILING 1 .® 7 1 10.0' .11 //7 4' =LIN. LARGE BLOCK RETAINING WALL. DESIGNED BY OTHERS. 't CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ENGINEERS REVIEW AND APPROVAL COLOR TO BE SPECIFIED BY OWNER. LI PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY BUILDING - 118 UNITS CITY OF EDINA AUG 2 0 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 44, CONCRETE PAD FOR PUBLIC, ART. ART PIECE TO SE SUPPLIED BY OWNER. 74 1J, 1 e-''......1----,, :E .,-.11,,E.-- RMNr4-A t.'.',.....'.. i 0, ;r ., GARDENr ,_, 1 r ,' ". ".' 4- 4. 4,E/ (, ,-, ,-/ ' 11•,,',',,,4A \ 4- I ,11'.77,('''. 14 I st \ + s '.. A; : : : 4-.0 , 4 4-4, (, 4 , •-• ',4 A. .4 ,..1..., YL a 015 10' BUILDING SETBACK * * .1, 4, 4. .4 . 4, • * *X y* * * * * * iB ULM:MG ET8AFK 4• .6 " •1" * * 4, 4, • / 7/ II, 122 - - 70TH STREET WEST /,/X/r;/; dti,?0,1e4t 35 LF-1P 420.55% ME.335.34 LEGEND 10880.41 - I 5T.1 ea4o.97 s / /E% ST-7 RE864.91 , 1E881.26 SW 040•884.89., 1E1361 16 N I/ 37 LF - 15. ®655%I 869 ST-15 RE665.43 1E881.57 SW 1E:861.47 NE/ G866.69 9 TN ST-8 5887 .30 RE:807.78 D/ ,1011 ESIINM . ,887.7 1E863 84 SE HP.868.60 auEE'4111 ST-5 RE:867.94 1E:86206 SE / 1E:882.20 s 32 LF E861 .96 NEI @0.50% • /7! ST-3 RE868.43 1E66222 S E86222 NW / ' @0.00% ST-2 A1E86222 \ 5:870.19 " 0" CHAMBER INFILT. SY TEM BOTTOM OF CHAMBER: 861.25 00-YEAR HIM.: 865 70 ST-21 , 5870A3 IE.863.68 W ST-13 1E86449 E (872.50 4' PERFORATED PVC 10.11,1 TILT 1372.50 IE 885.00 L ,--(872.60) \"* ((7/7/77 .R9 V V 0 .„(10 'OW i17, .5, 7/7/1 ) 0.860.50) 0.860.50 TW 87 60 BW 861 00 UFT STATION DESIGN BY OTHERS. EXPECTED FLOW RATE =121 US PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY BUILDING 118 UNITS FFE: 872.50 P1 FFE: 860.50 ST-12 \ 871.62 1E866.00 1.73 871. (07 50) 111.1 S PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOIJT PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATOR PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION PROPOSED ADA SLOPE GRADING PLAN NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF EDINA SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE <1-800-252-1156> AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM 0.76 HDPE CF UP PER AASHTO M-252 HDPE 12. OR GREATER PER AS17,1E-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTAID-1785 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C.78, JOINTS PER ASTM 0361. C-990, AND C-443 HOPE PER ASTM 3212 PVC PER ASTM 0-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM 0-3212 CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR DUSTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATOR TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. EL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 8. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 9. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, MID OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 10. REFER TOME UTILITY FLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER AWN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION. 11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS ANO GUMMI° GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 12. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF CLASS 5> AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. 13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILUNG, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF <4. OF TOPSOIL>. 14. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER/ FLOW UNE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2%. IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 6%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS MID GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR ADA COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 18. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM Of 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. 17. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE W INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS. 18. ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION ,XXXXX> OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION. 19. ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING MANHOLE CONNECTIONS. 20. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT PLUMBING CODE. 21. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM CF 126% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. 22. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT .INFALL CURB. WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER NO0 NDUTFALL. CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 10 20 40 886.19 it, g,3 i III 4, 1 A li t/ .t III In ,, ti f u, .,./ t, 1,i ii it i!i iiii i. I I '• --C.---?' I •?/ i L.r / i , , '''. //,, / ••, A (// ',/i -',) E869.32 P , _, 11,\ //, , 0, , N ,,,, ,,,-/ - // ,,' ----y, \ 11 1 A 4 4', ..... ..,".1...1,1!.. 10 ,;' 0 1 1\1 I I A \ \ , I \ , I \ \ 1 \ \ \, \ \ \ \ \ `7i,r oi 111 r•„-, 1 gl HI C, ME869.06 369.39) 97.15 RE870.00 PLANNING DEPARTMEN7 CITY OF EDINA AUG 2 0 2021 1/4 1 H 4 872 SO) j "0- ' . - \ 114 , S8724 gill, /1 4 - , arM) i 1* -CiE103 i / . 0 TWO 4' PERFORATED PVC OFTAINTILE IT: 881.85 ._..422433 4 867.8 PrITE031 i jE) ---..Warefil) I 867.87 PROPOSE. • • N ARD BOTTOM: 863.85 'ENGINEERED SOIL MEDIAIDRAINTILE 18:861.85 867.95) • / :7 -29 -12• @0.75% 51-19 RE,868 85 G871.72 ' 1E8636262W IE,863.86 E 1E863.525 ( 81.F- 1W @1.50% ST-26 1E86340 N , VT. 0:87121 G.871.18) T/G,872.31 1E862.87 N <1 PROPOSED • lIN GARDEN BENOGTTINOEMER8E6D7MSOIL MEDIAJDRAINTILE 1E: 865.00 YEAK 7: 13( . 84 I `r 72. [f. \ • `:\ T T •,,, \ il'IN• N l N. IIi 111 1/, \ / /I/ / /irk- '. - - - - - - _ _-__:,-=____,..___ -.'"---'1-----•-\-- -, 00 872 872 70TH -STREET WEST 925 0 • • 1000( /fic7a)-- LPTh GRAC 709(- EOP(- 0.0% 0.00% PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 9,3 / S/ EDINA MULTIFAMILY SHEET NUMBER C500 N.dwg July 29, 2 0 0 (1) 0 .2 KATWCLDEV\ LUPE DEVELOPMENT\Edina Multifamily \3 7 m 7c1 0 O m z m K2 0 n 0 Am z m y Rig FIEs `r,j?mm 69'698 :1MH i1A-00 STORMWATER DRAINTILE DETAIL Co ,1 8 rT, P my o a 11 z ffig72. 84g 2 F,0712E1 FiG) 0> mm 0 z mm Fni zm Dy mo vea, 030 um 0 X ,) PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VNICA JO A1.10 LNAIALLHVc130 ONINNbild DATE VOf BY REVISIONS N KHA PROJECT 160062001 DATE 07/30/2021 SCALE AS SHOWN DESIGNED BY DOS DRAWN BY DSS CHECKED BY BMW I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLOW. SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT IAM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA BRIAN M. WURDEMAN, MN 07000021 LIC. NO. 03113 DATE: KATVVC_LDEV \ LUPE DEVELOPMENT \ Edina Multifamily\ 3 Design \ CAD \PlanSheets C5-GRADING DETAILS.dwg July 28, 2021 - 6:01pm (.11 EDINA MULTIFAMILY PREPARED FOR LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS EDINA MN Kimley*Horn 2021 KIIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUS11S AVE, SUITE 100. ST. PAUL. MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM GRADING DETAILS 0 LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED 1.1 GATE VALVE HYDRANT 4 REDUCER L-T-I TEE (5.1 0 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE • SANITARY CLEANOUT WATERMAN OIL SANITARY SEWER • STORM SEWER STORM SEWER ELC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC COM TELEPHONE GAS GAS MAIN UTILITY PLAN NOTES 1. ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE. AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED UTILITIES. 2. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 81 PVC SDR35 PER ASTM 0-3034. FOR PIPES LESS THAN 12 DEEP fr PVC SDR26 PER ASTM 0.3034, FOR PIPES MORE THAN 12 DEEP 61 PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D-1785 DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 3. WATER LINES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 61 AND LARGER, PVC C-900 PER ASTM 0 2241 CLASS 200 UNDER COUNTY ROADS, OTHERWISE CLASS 150 r AND LARGER DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AY/WA C1513 SMALLER THAN 31 PIPING SHALL BE COPPER TUBE TYPE 11C PER ANSI 81622 OR PVC. 200 P.S.I., PER ASTM DI784 AND D2241. 4. MINIMUM TRENCH NOM SHALL BE 2 FEET. 5 ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUST BLOCKING. WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR AS INDICATED IN THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 8. ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN (101 APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING 181 VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE OR STRUCTURE). 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF IRS' COVER ON ALL WATERLINES. NEW / A CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT FIBER OPTIC UNE ALONG VALLEY RD. \ * / / N 1/ / / / ,//, / -/ 7,2 11 i. i'-. 111 ,i, I 1, ; II ,I -' III l ii, '.., hi h) I //I .11,1 `-', IIIA 11 C'f.1 ) III 'lir, ,: iii III f, ILII ILII I 10 f ill 1111 I I - /0 I lit )11 1 ll \ I I, Ili 1111 IL _ 5/// i V-,.:_-__9.) 1 ii CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTEC FIBER OPTIC UNE '7/ / r1 II i VIII ALONG VALLEY VIEW RD /// I.' :- , A II \ ,, , \ L'---L-.11 r-_-_- ,,,, //,/ IF' i 11 I I\ A EL9.,////1 1111 till EL( I, Ill INSTALL HYDRANT ASSEMBLY s \ \ /,/f/ / ..-: 1:111/\ ,, 111 I AGATE ,/A , 3, . \ '1.-:'-_-L:: PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY BUILDING 118 UNITS FFE: 872.50 P1 FFE: 860.50 V V PROPOSED GAS METER LOCATION DATA CONDUITS (SEE (SEE ARCH. PLANS) ARCH. PLANS) PROPOSED WATER MET& REMOTE READ LOCATION (SEE ARCH. PLANS) 8S•1 1E115E25 S ELECTRICAL METER PANEL LOCATION (SEE ARCH. PLANS) TRANSFORMER SWITCH (ELS) (SEE ARCH. PLANS) 4_ IV WATER CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE SERVICE RELOCATION OF ELECTRIC POWER POLE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE TELECOM PROVIDER ELECTRICAL CONNECTION WITII CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE GAS CONNECTION WITH GAS PROVIDER OUSTING ELECTRICAL HAND HOLE 6^ X 6' TEE --///' CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAN. COORDINATE REQUIRED SHUTOFF WITH CRY. 70TH STREET WEST OUSTING FIRE HYDRANT (PO FO, i1,0E FC,SpC 1,1P1 CF 0011 8. IN THE EVENT OFA VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER UNES, SANITARY ONES, STORM LINES AND GAS LINES, OR ANY OBSTRUCTION (EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THE SANITARY LINE SHALL BE SCH. 40 OR C900 WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF Ir VERTICAL SEPARATION. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR ANSI 21.11 (AMA C-151) (CLASS 50). 9. UNES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED. INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE BACKFILLING. 10 TOPS OF MANHOLES SHALL BE RAISED AS NECESSARY TO DE FLUSH WITH PROPOSED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS, ANO TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS. IN GREEN AREAS. WITH WATERTIGHT LIDS. II.ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSION STRENGTH AT 3000 PS I. 12 EXISTING unimEs SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY NEW UNES. 13. REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES. 14. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF EDINA AND/OR STATE OF MN WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION OF THE WATER AND SEWER LINES. IS. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE. MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BENG EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTIUTY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 16. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES. 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP FLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 19. BACKFLOW DEVICES (DDCV AND PFt2 ASSEMBLIES) AND METERS ARE LOCATED IN THE INTERIOR OF 111E BUILDING. REF. ARCH / MEP PLANS. 20. ALL ONSITE WATERAVLINS AND SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED. 21. ALL WATERMAN STUBOLITS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED WITH REACTION BLOCKING. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 10 20 40 NL-BB-2 D. IE 858.07 N IEL 1146.88 W IE' 840.85E CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM LOCATION OF INVERTS //, e'IIii l Ij it F _ /fi /1, , 451 BEND L)- 2-> I TELECOM CONNECTION WITH PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA AUG 2 0 X021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2 2 N I- w 0. • O cc 2 Z • 111 • • r<4E W Si g. LLI 0 <( EDINA MULTIFAMILY - SHEET NUMBER C600 to 7 U RI IB Eh: 0 0 KATVVCLDEV\ LUPE DEVELOPMENT\Edina Mul UNRii ROCK MULCH (TYP.) - 2-4. DIAMETER RIVER ROCK. V DEEP 70TH STREET WEST (80 FOOT WOE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY) 0 , AUG 2 0 2 PLANT SCHEDULE 26 TREES DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.) OWNER TO CONFIRM NATURAL OR DYED COLOR OFF-STREET PARKING SCREENING: MUST BE 4 FEET ABOVE LEVEL OF PARKING LOT WITH MINIMUM OPACITY OF 90 PERCENT YEAR ROUND. CD 1===.- 2-4" DIAMETER RVB BETULA NIGRA ABM GSL 2 ACER X FREEMAN!! 'AUTUMN BLAZE' TILIA CORDATA 'GREENSPIRE' 30' OC O 2 SIZE & HT. SIZE 6'HT. 6'HT. SIZE CONT CAL B&B CONT CAL B&B B&B CONT CAL B & B 2.5" CAL. B & B 2.5" CAL. CONT SPACING SIZE 18* OC #1 CONT KIT KAT CATMINT tit CONT 18' OC PRAIRIE DROPSEED #1 CONT 24" OC POW WOW WILDBERRY CONEFLOWER #1 CONT 24" OC ROSY RETURNS DAYLILY #1 CONT 18' O.C. COMMON NAME CONT SIZE SPACING NEW ENGLAND ASTER FLAT T PLUGS 36'0C LITTLE BLUESTEM GRASS FLAT r PLUGS 3V OC BLUE VERVAIN FLAT T PLUGS 36' OC JOE PYE WEED FLAT T PLUGS 18" OC OX-EYE SUNFLOWER FLAT r PLUGS 36' OC PRAIRIE SLAZINGSTAR FLAT 18" OC LANDSCAPE LEGEND CONIFEROUS SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME GOJ 16 JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA 'GREY 0881: TAU 20 TAXUS X MEDIA 'TAUNTONII' TGA 15 THUJA OCCIDENTALIS 'BAILJOHN' TM CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME ACD 6 CORNUS SERICEA 'ALLEMAN'S COMPACT 8DP 30 SYRINGA X 'SMSJ BP7' TM BLC 19 ARONIA MELANOCARPA IROQUOIS BEAUTY' TM GLS 30 RHUS AROMATICA 'GRO-LOW LDN 55 PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS 'DONNA MAY' TM LQF 16 HYDRANGEA PANICULATA 'SMHPLOF TM SEM 48 SORBARIA SORBIFOLIA 'SEM' CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME BES 159 RUDBECKIA FULGIDA 'GOLDSTURM' KFG 75 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA 'KARL FOERSTER' KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS #1 CONT KKC 106 NEPETA X FAASSENII 'KIT KAT' PDS 22 SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS PWW 22 ECHINACEA X 'POW WOW WILDBERRY' RAD 41 HEMEROCALLIS X 'ROSY RETURNS' CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME AST 52 ASTER NOVAE-ANGLIAE BLU 35 SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM BLV 43 VERBENA HASTATA JPW 226 EUPATORIUM MACULATUM OXE 42 HELIOPSIS HELIANTHOIDES PBS 147 LIATRIS PYCNOSTACHYA LANDSCAPE KEYNOTES 28 TREES = 1,039 FEET PERIMETER / 40 0 EDGER (TYP.) 0 SOD (TYP.) CONIFEROUS TREE ORNAMENTAL TREE DECIDUOUS SHRUBS a a a O PERENNIALS RAIN GARDEN 115101,11 InfddAlQl 104 001 A7;Wfr 004 )11111. t/ KATVVCLDE \ALUPE DEVELOPMENT\ Edina Multifamily \ 3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\L1-LANDSCAPE PLAN.dwg July 28, 2021 - 6:02pm III I //// III / \ \ 111 111 II I !I, l/I /// /// I A ' L/. i oa tl 2 - RTD 24 - JPW 3- RVB 9- OXE 6 , AST 3 - RTD 3 - BLU 4- OXE 14 - PEI8 5 - BLV 29 - JPW 2 - RTD .2jZ' st" / / ,' 15 - JPW • 2 - RID / 5 - BLV 3 - RVB / 16 - JPW 8 - OXE 2 - RTD 9 - AST 4 - BLV 5 - BLU 2 - RTD 18 - PBS 44,441,49-KFG 9-KFG 8-KFG 4gAlmiagi ghlYesir;ts ,v4A ,,Mattateto yomeAlcommonommEN 01 qi 61 - BES 31 - KKC 18 - GLS 2-SDP raikarePOI 5 LDN 2 - KKC 13ein 12 - BES moctio.to *maely'01 \NA:niltaco* li 5 - LQF 3 - TAU 3 - TAU 3 - LCIF 3 - ACD 5 LOP 3 - ACD_ 2 - BDP II MI -0 MINIM NUS- 60000600 41040.0.0.go 0009'000 • 4-GOJ 2-BHS QI Ort ID 3 - AST 5-BLV 4- OXE 4 - AST 6 - BLU 3 - BLV 29 - PBS 32 - JPW PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY BUILDING 118 UNITS 12 - KKC FFE: 872.50 12 - BES P1 FFE: 860.50 7-SEM 5-LDN 111 3 - BIC 2 - LDN 3 - BDP 5 - SEM 9-PDS 2-TAU 3-BDP 2 - JTL Y OF EDI OVERSTORY TREE RAIN GARDEN O 0 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS TREES REQUIRED: TREES PROVIDED: 4-91C 8- SEM 9- ?VW 9 - LpN 13 - pDS 13 - BES set 1 EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE ((VP.) EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE (TYP.) EXISTING SHRUB (TYP.) EDGER (TYP.) a* al. APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD / IRRIGATION, SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.) SEED/ SOD EDGE (TYP.) COMMUNITY GARDEN AREA- DETAILS TBD FENCING - SEE ARCH AND CIVIL PLANS 18 - PBS 6 - AST 4 - RTD 5 - BLV 6- OXE 7 - BLU 35 - PBS 29 - JPW 9 - AST 23 - JPW 3 - BLC 2- GOJ 9 - RRD 5 - LDN 19 - KKC 5 - TGA 3 - LDN 2 - BHS 3 - BLC 4 - SEM 5- PWW 3 - BDP 3-TGA 3-LON 2-BHS 2-GOJ 3-BDP 12 - KKC 4 - SEM 3 - BLC 3 - LDN 3 - BDP 2 - TAU 5 - SEM 13 - RRD 2-BHS 3 - BDP 2 - LON 4 - GOJ 3 - BDP 10 - LDN CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME BliS 8 PICEA GLAUCA 'DENSATA' CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME JTL 9 SYRINGA RETICULATA CODE DIY BOTANICAL NAME CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME RIO 33 CORNUS SERICEA 'BAILADELINE' S z I— z ww °; 22 2 w2 ;) ct LU w a_ UJ -J a SHEET NUMBER L100 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LANDSCAPE PLAN EDINA MULTIFAMILY COMMON NAME BLACK HILLS SPRUCE COMMON NAME JAPANESE TREE LILAC RIVER BIRCH MULTI-TRUNK COMMON NAME AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE GREENSPIRE LITTLELEAF LINDEN COMMON NAME w O () 2 52 FIREDANCE RED TWIG DOGWOOD COMMON NAME GREY OWL JUNIPER TAUTON YEW TECHNITO GLOBE ARBORVITAE COMMON NAME DWARF RED TWIG DOGWOOD #5 CONT. 4' O.C. CONT SPACING SIZE #5 CONT. 4' O.C. #5 CONT. 4' 0,C. #5 CONT. 3' 0.C. CONT SPACING SIZE #5 CONT. 4' O.C. L O Pt,8 17' ; ?,`?; CU W W 3 , BLOOMERANG DARK PURPLE LILAC 05 CONT. IROQUOIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRY #5 CONT. 4' O.C. GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC LITTLE DEVIL NINEBARK LITTLE QUICK FIRE HYDRANGEA SEM FALSESPIREA COMMON NAME BLACK-EYED SUSAN #5 CONT. 4' O.C. #5 CONT. 4' O.C. #5 CONT. #5 CONT. 3' O.C. CONT SIZE SPACING GRAPHIC SCALE 114 FEET 0 10 20 NOTES: 1. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2. PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING. 3. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED PLANTING SOIL. INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR UP TO 2" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE WITH BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), INTACT. 4. SLIT REMAINING TREATED BURLAP AT 6' INTERVALS. 5. BACKFILL TO WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12' OF THE TOP OF THE ROOTBALL, THEN WATER PLANT. REMOVE THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO HORIZONTAL RINGS WHICHEVER IS GREATER. REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROM THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS. 6. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL 7. WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 8. BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME. 9. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 10. FINAL LOCATION OF TREE TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER. 1101 TREE PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH SOD .11=IIPI1= 11=Iik 111rall MlAi#PAIMliff Ii#17=ThAMIMMI&-.11. 4' TOPSOIL ---- _ ................. , =NAHUM" Arm 11-11. !. Alm Em• 41=11- PLANTING SOIL 2X ROOT BALL WIDTH ON CENTER SPACING AS STATED ON PLAN. NOTES: 1. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2. PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING OF TOP AND ROOT. 3. REMOVE CONTAINER AND SCORE OUTSIDE OF SOIL MASS TO REDIRECT AND PREVENT CIRCLING FIBROUS ROOTS. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS. 4. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL 5. WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 6. BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME. 7. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 8. MIX IN 3.4' OF ORGANIC COMPOST. SHRUB / PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL SCALE N.T.S L101 EXTEND HOLE EXCAVATION WIDTH A MINIMUM OF 6' BEYOND THE PLANTS ROOT SYSTEM. FINISHED GRADE EDGER, AS SPECIFIED PREPARED PLANTING BED AND BACKFILL SOIL (THOROUGHLY LOOSENED) SECTION PLAN L101 1.101 STEEL EDGER DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. TURF/SOD 12' STEEL EDGER SPIKE 3/16' X 4" STEEL EDGER MULCH 3/16' X 4' STEEL EDGER TURF/SOD TOP OF EDGER TO BE FLUSH WITH SOD 12' STEEL EDGER SPIKE MULCH SUBGRADE MULCH AT PLANTING AREA SPADED EDGE 'V' SHAPED, 4' WIDTH, 4' DEPTH, MORE VERTICAL ON LAWN SIDE / SPADED EDGE DETAIL SCALE 1-1/2,E LAWN GRASS FINISHED GRADE a is N cn O O cy, E 3 KATVVC_LDEV\ LUPE DEVELOPMENTEdi I- a. IoW 2 z 0 LU `.ec o.p< a -J a EDINA MULTIFAMILY (,) < C.) - CO < I- Z LLL < -J SHEET NUMBER L101 LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. 2. ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS. 3. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 4. ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. 6. ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE. MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING. CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER ANDA HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3. 7. PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. 8. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA 8 ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES. 9. PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. 10. PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED 8 BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED 8 BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 11. OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS: REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS. 12. PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. 13. WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST. 14. STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. 15. THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. 16. BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW) AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12' DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS. 17. MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4' DEPTH OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS. PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2' DEPTH DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND NATURAL OR DYED COLOR, OWNER TO CONFIRM. ROCK MULCH TO BE 2-4' DIAMETER RIVER ROCK, AT MINIMUM 6" DEPTH, OR APPROVED EQUAL. EXCEPT ON BOTTOM OF INFILTRATION BASINS, ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 18. EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE COL-MET (OR EQUAL) STEEL EDGING; 3/16" THICK, COLOR BLACK, OR SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. STEEL EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND STAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH TOP OF EDGER AT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, OR RAIN-GARDEN BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 19. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. SEED AS SPECIFIED AND PER MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 20. PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS-BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 21. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PL NT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR. 22. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 23. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. 24. RAIN GARDEN NOTE: PROVIDE AND INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AT RAIN GARDEN AREA SIDE SLOPES AFTER ALL PLANTING HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. BLANKET TO BE ONE SEASON GEOJUTE, MN/DOT CATEGORY 2 (STRAW 1S, WOOD FIBER 1S), OR APPROVED EQUAL. BLANKET TO BE OVERLAPPED BY 4' AND ANCHORED BY SOD STAPLES. PLACE BLANKET PERPENDICULAR TO THE SLOPE. TRENCH IN EDGES OF BLANKET AREA TO PREVENT UNDER MINING. PROVIDE SILT FENCE AT TOP OF SLOPE AS NEEDED. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO MATCH OTHER PROJECT PLANTING MULCH. PLACE 4" DEPTH OF MULCH AT ALL PLANTING AND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AREA (NO FILTER FABRIC). SEE RAIN GARDEN DETAIL FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. RAIN GARDEN TO PROVIDE PROPER INFILTRATION AND DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS PER ENGINEERS APPROVAL. 25. MAINTAIN TREES, SHRUBS, AND OTHER PLANTS UNTIL PROJECT COMPLETION, BUT IN NO CASE, LESS THAN FOLLOWING PERIOD; 1 YEAR AFTER PROJECT COMPLETION. MAINTAIN TREES, SHRUBS, AND OTHER PLANTS BY PRUNING, CULTIVATING, AND WEEDING AS REQUIRED FOR HEALTHY GROWTH. RESTORE PLANTING SAUCERS. TIGHTEN AND REPAIR STAKE AND GUY SUPPORTS AND RESET TREES AND SHRUBS TO PROPER GRADES OR VERTICAL POSITION AS REQUIRED. RESTORE OR REPLACE DAMAGED WRAPPINGS. SPRAY AS REQUIRED TO KEEP TREES AND SHRUBS FREE OF INSECTS AND DISEASE. REPLENISH MULCH TO THE REQUIRED DEPTH. MAINTAIN LAWNS FOR 45 DAYS AFTER INSTALLING SOD INCLUDING MOWING WHEN SOD RECITES 4' IN HEIGHT. WEED PLANTING BEDS AND MULCH SAUCERS AT MINIMUM ONCE A MONTH DURING THE GROWING SEASON. PROVIDE A MONTHLY REPORT TO THE OWNER ON WEEDING AND OTHER MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES. 26. SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING. 27. OWNER AND ARCHITECT TO CONFIRM SITE FURNISHINGS SUCH AS BENCHES, BIKE RACKS AND/OR TRASH RECEPTACLES. CITY OF EDINA AUG 2 0 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION (ECUMEN® Lupe Development Partners JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS Kimley>>> Horn Expect More. Experience Better. ' NMI PROJECT TEAM SHEET INDEX APPLICANT ISA JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN & LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS EXISTING SITE CIVIL 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 01 EXISTING CONDITIONS & CONTEXT COVER SHEET ECUMEN 3530 LEXINGTON AVENUE NORTH, SHOREVIEW, MN 55126 ARCHITECT POPE ARCHITECTS 02 CONTEXT PLAN ALTA SURVEY CITY OF EDINA CONTACT: ANNE STANFIELD, DIRECTOR OF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT 1295 BANDANA BLVD N, SUITE 200, ST. PAUL, MN 55108 GENERAL NOTES ANNESTANFIELD@ECUMEN.ORG I (651) 766-4320 LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC WARD ISAACSON, PRESIDENT— WISAACSON@POPEARCH.COM ZAC ROSENOW, ARCHITECT— ZROSENOW@POPEARCH.COM ARCHITECTURAL 03 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN DEMO PLAN SITE PLAN APR 12 2021 1701 MADISON STREET NE, SUITE 111, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413 CIVIL ENGINEER 04 PEDESTRIAN & TRANSIT CIRCULATION DIAGRAM GRADING PLAN CONTACT: STEVE MINN, VICE PRESIDENT & CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER STEVE.MINN@LUPEDEVELOPMENT.COM I (612) 843-4069 KIMLEY-HORN 767 N EUSTIS ST SUITE 100, ST PAUL, MN 55114 05 FLOOR PLANS: LOWER LEVEL & LEVEL ONE UTILITY PLAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT 00 BRIAN WURDEMAN, CIVIL ENGINEER — BRIAN.WURDEMAN@KIMLEY-HORN.COM 06 FLOOR PLANS: LEVEL TWO & LEVEL THREE LANDSCAPE PLAN 07 FLOOR PLANS: LEVEL FOUR & ROOF LANDSCAPE DETAILS COVER SHEET 08 ELEVATION DRAWINGS *NOTE: SCALE IS PRESERVED ONLY WHEN PRINTED AT 24X36. 09 EXTERIOR RENDERINGS 10 EXTERIOR MATERIALS Lupe Development Partners (ECUMEN® JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS Kimley*lorn Expect More. Experience Better. CITY OF EDINA APR 12 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 01 EXISTING CONDITIONS & CONTEXT Lupe Development Partners (ECUMEI\l' JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS Kimley0Horn Expect More. Experience Better. CITY OF EDINP, APR 12 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT NOT TO SCALE 02 CONTEXT PLAN <CC\.RESTORATION • HARDWARE & RH RESTAURANT' •tAl BANK OF AMERICA BMO HARRIS BREMER BANK' /SALON CONCEPTS ROCHE BOBOIS ilaNDERBERRY I HILL CHILD *if DEVELOPMENji CENTER "Ir 4,-2/ SOUTHDALE ',PET HOSPITAL TD AMERITRADE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD ROOM & BOARD I 1 qlr (ECUMEN1' Lupe Development Partners JOINT VENTURE OF ECU MEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDI NA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS Kimlep)Horn Expect More. Experience Better. 1"=20' 03 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN MOM CITY OF EDINA APR 1 2 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1.41INGIE - AP. SVIWOLIt R411141.1.111.110111VARIFS MUT VIVIIIOAD /1' ( ( RAIN GARDEN 4 *# ( COMMUNITY SCULPTURE ART/COMMUNITY HI0 ROOM DLI II ST4AJR TAIR At W. 70TH STREET RAIN GARDEN STAT TO U.G. PARKING/ - • `Nt• 1.1aW LOBBY (ECLIM EN' Lupe Development Partners JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS KimlepAlorn Expect More. Experience Better. CITY OF EDINA APR 1 2 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT NOT TO SCALE 04 PEDESTRIAN & TRANSIT CIRCULATION I BICYCLE CIRCULATION PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION W 7 OTHarS,Tomosio. UV voTH O DISTANCE TO TRANSIT STOPS 70TH ST W & TARGET -- 0.4 MI FRANCE AVE S & 72ND ST -- 0.4 MI YORK AVE S & 69TH ST W -- 0.7 MI SOUTH DALE EXIT & YORK AVE -- 0.7 MI SITE PARKING Type Use TOTAL VEHICULAR SURFACE 23 UNDERGROUND 86 TOTAL PARKING STALLS 109 BICYCLE OUTDOORS (PUBLIC) TBD INDOORS (RESIDENT/PRIVATE) TOD TOTAL BICYCLE RACKS 0 I(ECUMEN® • -5 1.1 U.,. • Lupe Development Partners CITY OF EDINA APR 12 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS Kimlep)Horn Expect More. Experience Setter. 1"=20' CORR 1 BED 1 BED 2 BED 1 BED STAN 2 EEO 1 0E0 STORAGE ART ROOM 1 BED 1 BED .L 1 BED 1 BED MAINTENANCE OFFICE '1 7 WORK ROOM OFFICER OFFICE.2 1:1 1 BED STAIR ,11111111, ELECMATA LRIDRY \ I BED 2 BED STORAG / / I 2 1 RED 1 BED CIRCULATION COMMON SPACE INDEPENDENT LIVING STORAGE [ SUPPORT APARTMENTS Unit Type GSF 1st Floor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor 4th Floor TOTAL Units1 % of Total NKSF Al 1 BED 500 10 11 11 10 42 82% 21,000 A2 1 BED 600 8 12 12 7 39 23,400 A3 1 BED 750 3 6 5 2 16 12,000 B1 2 BED 875 3 4 3 3 13 11,375 B2 2 BED 1035 2 2 2 2 8 18% 8,280 TOTAL PER FLOOR 26 35 33 24 TOTAL UNITS 118 100% TOTAL UNIT S.F. 76,055 BUILDING GROSS S.F. Lower Level 1st Floor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor 4th Floor S.F. TOTAL 31,400 31,400 29,600 21,500 113,900 31,400 31,400 TOTAL BUILDING 145,300 EX 05 2 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 2 BED WATER/ SPRINKLER LOWER LEVEL & LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLANS LOWER LEVEL PLAN LEVEL 1 PLAN JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 POPE A RC H I TEC T S Kimley>>> Horn Expect More. Experience Better. CITY OF EDINA APR 1 2 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1"=20' 06 LEVEL 2 & LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLANS lJ STORAGE ELEVATOR LOBBY 1 BED 2 BED 2 BED L — LEVEL 2 PLAN 2 BED 1 BED SH 1 BED 2 BED _ 1 BED 1 BED 2 BED 1 BED ELEVATOR LOBBY rel 1 _. BED ,- BED 1 BED ' 1 BED . - 2 0ED LEVEL 3 PLAN INCH MEDD GREEN ROOF 2 BED 1 BED _I] CIRCULATION COMMON SPACE INDEPENDENT LIVING STORAGE SUPPORT YEC U M E Lupe Development Partners /AEON (E,CLIMEN' Lupe Development Partners 1 BEE 1 BED T 1 BED STAIR ROOFTOP ROOFTOP LOUNGE 1 BED V STORAGE 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED ELEVATOR LOBBY 2 BED 1 BED 1 BED 2 BED 1 BEN 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 2 BED JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 POPE A RC H I T E C TS KimleyHorn Expect More. Experience Better. CITY OF EDINA APR 1 2 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1"=20' 07 LEVEL 4 & ROOF FLOOR PLANS LEVEL 4 PLAN ROOF PLAN - PHOTOVU.TAIO SYSTEM - 1 BED CIRCULATION Li COMMON SPACE INDEPENDENT LIVING STORAGE SUPPORT 2 BED 1 BED ROOFTOP 1 BED N 1 BED N 1 BED N STOREFRONT METAL SIDING SOUTH NORTH REFINISHED BALCONIES/RAILINGS P II it NM NE 11 II r1 11 PP H 11 Ss so Nu o II H •• •• WEST EAST II II II •• 11 11 111 •• •• ME .111 Vii' 1 11 1 11) II ! 11 11 1 1 11 11111111,11 mm 1111.-.11V-11117 FIBER CEMENT1 COI OP 21 H I! II 11 !I II II .111 11 11 11 It II 11C- FIBER CEMENT Cn! OR RH HR CT(11,1-1-C,r, JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS Kimley>>> Horn Expect More. Experience Better. CITY OF EDINA APR 12 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BASED ON 1/16" PERSPECTIVES MATERIALS - TOTAL BUILDING MATERIAL NAME MATERIAL AREA PERCENT of WALL MASONRY 4,740 11.1% METAL 13,634 32.0% FIBER CEMENT LAP 10,741 25.2% GLASS 13,499 31.7% TOTALS 42,614 100.0% (EC.0 M E ® Lupe Development Partners • • • • • • • I • I STONE FIBER CEMENT COLOR-2 METAL PANE /di Tin RH E] LEI 11:1 • • 11 ma 1'1111111 II Ii i1 Ir,1 11 11 • • ST( ,BER CEMENT COLOR-1 COMPOSITE WINDOWS/DOORS EAST ELEVATION MATERIAL NAME MATERIAL AREA PERCENT of WALL MASONRY 1,408 10.6% METAL 2,324 17.5% FIBER CEMENT LAP 4,724 35.5% GLASS 4,839 36.4% TOTALS 13,295 100.0% WEST ELEVATION MATERIAL NAME MATERIAL AREA PERCENT of WALL MASONRY 1,546 1 1.8% METAL 4,599 35.2% FIBER CEMENT LAP 2,837 21.7% GLASS 4,072 31.2% TOTALS 13,054 100.0% FIBER CEMENT COLOR-I SOUTH ELEVATION MATERIAL NAME MATERIAL AREA PERCENT of WALL MASONRY 1,363 15.8% METAL 2,833 32.9% FIBER CEMENT LAP 1,934 22.5% GLASS 2.473 28.7% TOTALS 8,603 100.0% NORTH ELEVATION MATERIAL NAME MATERIAL AREA PERCENT of WALL MASONRY 423 5.5% METAL 3,878 50.6% FIBER CEMENT LAP 1,246 16.3% GLASS 2,115 27.6% TOTALS 7.662 100.0% 08 I II ELEVATIONS CITY OF EDINA APR 1 2 2021 09.1 YEC U M E N® Lupe Development Partners JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS Kimley>>) Horn Expect More. Experience Better. PLANNING DEPARTMEN iRENDERINGS AERIAL PERSPECTIVE LOOKING EAST PERSPECTIVE LOOKING EAST FROM VALLEY VIEW DRIVE CITY OF EDINA APR 12 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT (ECUMEN* Lupe Development Partners JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS Kimler)>Horn Expect More. Experience Better. 09.2 RENDERINGS Lupe Development Partners 09.3 RENDERINGS APR 12 2021 CITY OF EDINA PERSPECTIVE LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM VALLEY VIEW DRIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT (ECUMEN® JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS Kimley>>> Horn Expect More. Experience Better. Lupe Development Partners 09.4 RENDERINGS APR 12 2021 CITY OF EDINA PERSPECTIVE LOOKING NORTH FROM W 70TH STREET PLANNING DEPARTMENT (ECUMEN® JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS Kimlep)Horn Expect More. Experience Better. Lupe Development Partners JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS BLACK COMPOSITE WINDOWS STOREFRONT, BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES AND PATIO DOORS )(ECUMEN® 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 DARK GRAY POWDERCOATED METAL PANEL STACKED, LIGHT COLORED STONE LIGHT WARM GRAY FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING (COLOR-1) MID-GRAY/BLUE FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING (COLOR-2) 10 EXTERIOR MATERIALS POPE ARCHITECTS Kimley>>> Horn Expect More. Experience Better. CITY OF EDINA APR 1 2 2021 SUNSHADE POWDER COATED GRAY METAL BALCONIES STEEL, POWDER COATED PLANNING DEPARTMENT V1%10111111 iRil NMI Lupe Development Partners EDINA MULTIFAMILY z I— w 2 U) re 0 Z u j 0 111 w w ce ll w Se. La a. 0 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR EDINA MULTIFAMILY SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 28N, RANGE 24W 4040 70TH STREET WEST EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN PROJECT TEAM: OWNER / DEVELOPER LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 0 PREPARED BY: BRIAN M. WURDEMAN 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100 ST. PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE (651) 645-4197 Sheet List Table Sheet Number Sheet Title C000 COVER SHEET V100 ALTA SURVEY C100 GENERAL NOTES C200 DEMO PLAN C300 TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERVATION PLAN C400 SITE PLAN C500 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C600 UTILITY PLAN L100 LANDSCAPE PLAN L101 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 1701 MADISON ST NE, SUITE 111 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413 TELEPHONE: (612) 436-3200 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100 ST. PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE: (651) 645-4197 CONTACT: RYAN A. HYLLESTED SURVEYOR EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC. 1229 TYLER STREET NE SUITE 100 TELEPHONE: (612)466-3300 FAX: (612) 466-3383 CONTACT: CHRISTOPHER A. TERWEDO CITY OF EDINA APR 12 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ARCHITECT POPE ARCHITECTS 1295 BANADANA BLVD N, SUITE 200 ST. PAUL, MN 55108 TELEPHONE: (651) 642-9200 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 1826 BUERKLE ROAD SAINT PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE: (651) 645-4197 CONTACT: STEVE MARTIN NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE SITE MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS INCLUDED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. IF REPRODUCED, THE SCALES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON A ARCH full bleed D (36.00 x 24.00 Inches) SHEET. 3. ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICES COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO ANNOUNCED BUILDING POSSESSION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICES. 4. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. Know what's below. Call before you dig. SHEET NUMBER PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION BENCHMARKS SITE BENCHMARKS: (LOCATIONS SHOWN ON SURVEY) SBM #1 TOP OF MNDOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "2733 Q" GSID STATION #95550 ELEVATION=874.82 (NAVD 88) SBM #2 TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 70TH STREET WEST ELEVATION,872.55 (NAVD 86) C000 ENGINEER KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Kimley>>>Horn W 66TH STREET •. W 69TH STREET cad VICINITY N.T.S. KATWCLDEV \LUPE DEVELOPMENT \ Edina Multifamily \ 3 Design \CAIMPlanSheets \CO-COVER SHEET.dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:06am EY.dwg April 12, Cn 0) F_ rn Cy E FIELD BOOK PAGE OPMENTE DRAWING NAME: 39551.dee JOB NO. 39551 FILE NO. 5458 EV\LUPE DEV VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE FIELDWORK CHIEF: TV DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: CT NO. DATE REVISIONS DESCRIPTION ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY ST MOWN" S0128'25 W 329.94 111 All AD mm C' ;-q SIX OVADadARX Mir Or IMAM? EleVoOr2.53 fT z 0 I- IY (/) 0 0 LL H z w 0_ EDINA MULTIFAMILY PREPARED FOR w 2 co CL 0 Z • re • < a a. a SHEET NUMBER V100 land surveyors since 1872 SHEET 1 OF 1 NOT TO SCALE, FOR REFERENCE ONLY PROPERTY ADDRESS: 4040 70th Street West Edina, Minnesota 55435 Egan, Field & Nowak, Inc. WWW.EFNSURVEY.COM COP MIGHT 0 2020 By ECAIE FIELD & NOWAK, INC. 1229 Tyler Street NE, Suite 100 Minneapolis. Minnesota 55413 PHONE: (612) 466-3300 PAX: (612) 466-3383 4 6) SCALE IN FEET • FOUND IRON MONUMENT, AS NOTED • SET IRON MONUMENT MARKED WITH LICENSE NUMBER 53536 O FOUND PK NAIL 3' 2 5 C ~Fy .142541 p: ry Ow Is ,17/-`,7/,`;"02XWI;1401135 AO, \ Cf: or-soz_16 1,817.9 RE-867.79-. E-847.7 15) lEoSS3J (£) 5) R gg o yy I '7°:;“ 7-".71454 31 //:',/ 1E I V I 1010701HSTROETIIEST BRICK BUMP. °MONO MO/We" APEAo14.112 YAK. SURVEY FOR: Kimley-Horn & Associates PiO660, • 611 • 7Th I V V • SOU .SPAR?Pot PLAT Or Off. PARR POST MOWN ,N0.04.25T 103.10 010OIN) a RAMP A s. "-I GE (CS' 5. PCP ny I L. 89-55:35V Q- -Re-OlO01 CoR0.S IO 00) 0) 1,83 ( ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY FOR: Kimley-Horn & Associates LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract C. Register. Land Roney No. 1365. Hennepin County. Minnesoto. Deng Registered land as N eAclences1 by Certificate of Site Na 1511530. GENERAL SURVEY NOTES: 1. The orientation of this bearing system is bored on The Hennepin County comknote grid (HAD 133-2011 Ad)). 2. The legal description ond emernent informotien used in Al. preporalMn of this survey Is based on the Commitment fa Title Insurance prepared by Guaranty Commercial Title, Inc os agent for ad Republic TIVe Lowrance Compony, Commitment No. 651374 doled October 6, 2020. OPTIONAL TABLE A ITEMS: 1. Monuments bore been placed ca 00 maim oomere of the property deserbed hereon, 010.33 Oreody marked or referenced by .13.g monuments or witnesses in dose proximity to the caner. 2. The address of the property deem/ed hereon is 4040 70th Street West, Fenno, lamest,. 55435. 3. November prboren, ertz Igwioed hereon lies sit*, Flood Zone X per Federol Insurance Role Mop No. 2705300364F. doted I. The told wee of the property desorbed hereon N 68.634 square feet or 1.57562 crags. 5. The contours depicted hereon are per ele.tIon data calected while conducting the fieldwork_ The contour intend is I foot. BENCHMARK: T. of Minnesota Deportment of Transportation Geodetic Monument '2733 0' GSD stall. 4 95550 Elemtion = 674.82 feet. (HAW 85) SITE BENCHMARK: Top at of hydrant Mooted on the south side of 70th Street West Donation = 872.55 Net. (NAVE/ ea) 6a. No 204000 repot or letter was received eon the Insurer pursuant to OptIond Table A Item 6(a). os sat forth in the 2016 Minimum Standard Detol Requirements for ALTA/HSPS Lend Tithe Surveys. 7o. Exterior Miceog dimensions are depicted here.. 7b1. The exterior buldng footprint cr., at grand level is depleted hereon. & Substantial lecture. observed in the process of conducting th• fidokumk we depleted hereon. 9. As of the dote of .le survey the property de Led hereon contain a total 01 78 visbly stuped poriOng tomes of which 76 ore standard maces end 2 ere handicapped spaces. too. There ore no dinAsMn or party walls on the properly described hereon. 11. Existing utdities, serices ond underground sto/clures shown hereon mere located eltbm physics'!, iron existMg records made ova.. to us. by resident testimony, or by locations provided by Gopher State One Cd1, per Ticket No. 210140753. Hower, locking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be occurately, cornp'ete'y and relobly depicted. Mere additional orMore detaled information is reguided. the client is odrised that excavation may be necessory. Other utiities and 33esi<03 moy be present and verification and location of oh ulXities and nen,es should be obtained from the owners al the respective 5111105 prior loony deign, plonnim or escamtlon. 13. The names of adjonIng miners occording to anent toe records are depicted hereon. to. As of the date of this survey there Is no obseovobie eVdence of current earth moving work, buten; construction or bolding additions on the property deserioed Noe.. 17. The surveyor Is unoware of any completed or proposed change. M sheet right-of-way lines_ As of Um dote of this eenybLher he.,...nts observoble eNdence of recent str.t or sidesok construction onrepoks that offect the property dosz 19. No plottable offslte easements or senitudes were deelosed in documents provided to the mmayce. 20. Professional Liability Neuron. policy obtained by the aurveyor to be in elf.' throughout the contract term, SURVEY ITEMS PER SCHEDULE B: ITEM 5: Sanitary Sewer emement(e) over the Land as sham on the recorded plot of South Office Park First Addition, omit as sham on the recorded plat of Replat of Lot 2. Block 1, South Office Pork Fist Addition. So, Soelory sever enserne, of/eels 0-e surtesed property crtl Is eeocled herein. LEGEND • BENCHMARK S SANITARY MANHOLE O MANHOLE (0) STORY MANHOLE IMMO CATCH ITA911 ▪ ROOF DRAIN (VALET) En At/TO SF/MOILER ri/- HYDRANT 080 SPRINKLER VALVE o ELECTRIC MANHOLE O GATE VALVE • HANDHCCE ▪ UGHT Ob UTILITY KIX GI GAS METER SICOI • HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACE S NW/CARPED PARKING SIGN 1151 PARKING COUNT SANITARY SEWER UNDERGROUND TELECOMMUNICATION WATERMAN! UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC OVERHEAD WIRE O UNDERGROUND GAS ss STCRil SEWER a. ma SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING CONTOUR Leif G.°0( TREE BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE WALL Au 20 40 60 (4) S 1 1 AAI v L., N I j J CITY OF EDINA APR 12 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATION: T.odLups Der y opmeConr,oLIZIniieg,. 1.1 Inc oe 0, in;etsts limited o Minnesota non-wolit commotion ublic TNI. nsurance Ca1Pany This Is to certify that this mop or plat and the coney on which It is bored sere made in mccodance with the 2016 Minimum Standard Del* Requirements for ALTA/HSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA ond AMPS, and includes Nees 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6(o), 7(o), 7(bXl), 8, 9, 10(o), 1000, II, 13, 16, 17, 19 and 20 of Toole A thereof. The fieldwerk cos completed on konuory 25, 2021. Dote of Plat or lAop. Februory 2. 2021 Chest aies1.4 4C,1( AtowA16' ex A. Terwedo Inv/mote license No. 53536 clefeedoliefneurvey.com EDINA MULTIFAMILY KATWC_LDE\ALUPE DEVELOPMENTEdina Multifamily \ 3 Design \CAD\PlanSheets \C1-GENERAL NOTES.dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:07am GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE MN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" (LATEST EDITION) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE CONTENTS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK, AND, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM AS APPLICABLE TO THESE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FURNISHING ALL MATERIAL AND LABOR TO CONSTRUCT THE FACILITY AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROPRIATE APPROVING AUTHORITIES, SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB ALL AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, REMOVING TREES, STUMPS, ROOTS, MUCK, EXISTING PAVEMENT AND ALL OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL. 3. THE EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS QUALITY LEVEL '0" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF Cl/ACRE 38/02, ENTITLED STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF SUBSURFACE QUALITY DATA BY THE FHA. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE ENGINEER AT THE TIME OF THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. GUARANTEE IS NOT MADE THAT ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN OR THAT THE LOCATION OF THOSE SHOWN ARE ENTIRELY ACCURATE. FINDING THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF ANY EXISTING UTILITIES IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY AND SHALL BE DONE BEFORE COMMENCING ANY WORK IN THE VICINITY. FURTHERMORE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES DUE TO THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. THE OWNER OR ENGINEER WILL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES SUSTAINED OR COST INCURRED BECAUSE OF THE OPERATIONS IN THE VICINITY OF EXISTING UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES, NOR FOR TEMPORARY BRACING AND SHORING OF SAME. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO SHORE, BRACE, SWING OR RELOCATE A UTILITY, THE UTILITY COMPANY OR DEPARTMENT AFFECTED SHALL BE CONTACTED AND THEIR PERMISSION OBTAINED REGARDING THE METHOD TO USE FOR SUCH WORK. 4. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES WHICH MAY HAVE BURIED OR AERIAL UTILITIES WITHIN OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION AREA BEFORE COMMENCING WORK THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 48 HOURS MINIMUM NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 5, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND BONDS IF REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES ONE COPY OF THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INCLUDING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND COPIES OF ANY REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS. 7. ANY DISCREPANCIES ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND ENGINEER BEFORE COMMENCING WORK NO FIELD CHANGES OR DEVIATIONS FROM DESIGN ARE TO BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE OWNER AND NOTIFICATION TO THE ENGINEER. 8. ALL COPIES OF COMPACTION. CONCRETE AND OTHER REQUIRED TEST RESULTS ARE TO BE SENT TO THE OWNER DIRECTLY FROM THE TESTING AGENCY. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTING AND MAINTAINING AS-BUILT INFORMATION WHICH SHALL BE RECORDED AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES OR AT THE COMPLETION OF APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION INTERVALS AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AS-BUILT DRAWINGS TO THE OWNER FOR THE PURPOSE OF CERTIFICATION TO JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES AS REQUIRED. ALL AS-BUILT DATA SHALL BE COLLECTED BY A STATE OF MN PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR WHOSE SERVICES ARE ENGAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 10. ANY WELLS DISCOVERED ON SITE THAT WILL HAVE NO USE MUST BE PLUGGED BY A LICENSED WELL DRILLING CONTRACTOR IN A MANNER APPROVED BY ALL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY WELL ABANDONMENT PERMITS REQUIRED. 11. ANY WELL DISCOVERED DURING EARTH MOVING OR EXCAVATION SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE APPROPRIATE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER DISCOVERY IS MADE. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THAT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS DO NOT CONFLICT WITH ANY KNOWN EXISTING OR OTHER PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. IF ANY CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PORTION OF THE SITE WORK THAT WOULD BE AFFECTED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY OWNER OF AN IDENTIFIABLE CONFLICT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH INSTALLATION RELIEVES OWNER OF ANY OBLIGATION TO PAY FORA RELATED CHANGE ORDER. 13. SHOULD CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTER ANY DEBRIS LADEN SOIL, STRUCTURES NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE DOCUMENTS, OR OTHER SOURCE OF POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION, THEY SHALL IMMEDIATELY CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER. EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE ALL MEASURES STATED ON THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN, AND IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION AS REQUIRED BY ALL JURISDICTIONS UNTIL NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED PHASE OF WORK OR FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CHECKED BY A CERTIFIED PERSON AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 7 CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE END OF A or RAINFALL EVENT, AND CLEANED AND REPAIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: INLET PROTECTION DEVICES AND BARRIERS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED IF THEY SHOW SIGNS OF UNDERMINING, OR DETERIORATION. 1. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL RE CHECKED REGULARLY TO SEE THAT A GOOD STAND IS MAINTAINED. AREAS SHOULD BE FERTILIZED, WATERED AND RESEEDED AS NEEDED. FOR MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS REFER TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2. SILT FENCES SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITIONS IF DAMAGED. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SILT FENCES WHEN IT REACHES ONE-THIRD THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE. 3. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE(S) SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOW OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING OF THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. 4. THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA SHALL BE KEPT IN GOOD CONDITION (SUITABLE FOR PARKING AND STORAGE). THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING OF THE TEMPORARY PARKING AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. 5 ALL MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SHALL BE DONE IN A TIMELY MANNER BUT IN NO CASE LATER THAN 2 CALENDAR DAYS FOLLOWING THE INSPECTION. TYPICAL OWNER/ENGINEER OBSERVATIONS CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWNER AND/OR ENGINEER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES: -PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING, SUBGRADE PREPARATION, BASE INSTALLATION ASPHALT INSTALLATION, UNDERGROUND PIPING AND UTILITIES INSTALLATION, INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURES, CHECK VALVES, HYDRANTS, METERS, ETC., SIDEWALK INSTALLATION, CONNECTIONS TO WATER AND SEWER MAINS, TESTS OF UTILITIES EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP") IS COMPRISED OF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THE STANDARD DETAILS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE, ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SWPPP, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. 2. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN AND THE STATE OF MN NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT (NPDES PERMIT) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS. 3. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OR MANUAL OF PRACTICE, AS APPLICABLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY THE PERMITTING AGENCY OR OWNER. 4. SITE ENTRY AND EXIT LOCATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION THAT WILL PREVENT THE TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED. DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ON A PUBLIC ROADWAY MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY, IT SHALL BE DONE IN AN AREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN. ALL FINES IMPOSED FOR DISCHARGING SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC AREAS SHALL BE PAID BY THE CONTRACTOR. 5. TEMPORARY SEEDING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS OF STABILIZATION SHALL BE INITIATED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE LAST DISTURBANCE ON ANY AREA OF THE SITE. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE CLEARING TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL PERMIT. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON PLAN THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA WHICH SHALL ALSO BE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING AREA, EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA, AND AREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES, OFFICE TRAILERS, AND TOILET FACILITIES. 8. ALL WASH WATER (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLE CLEANING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.) SHALL BE DETAINED AND PROPERLY TREATED OR DISPOSED. 9. SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON SITE OR READILY AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN-UP FUEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROL ON SITE. THE USE OF MOTOR OILS AND OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OPERATIONS IS PROHIBITED. 11. RUBBISH, TRASH, GARBAGE, LITTER, OR OTHER SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO SEALED CONTAINERS. MATERIALS SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM LEAVING THE PREMISES THROUGH THE ACTION OF WIND OR STORM WATER DISCHARGE INTO DRAINAGE DITCHES OR WATERS OF THE STATE. 12. ALL STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES PRESENTED ON THE PLAN SHALL BE INITIATED AS SOON AS IS PRACTICABLE. 13. ALL STAGING AREAS, STOCKPILES, SPOILS, ETC. SHALL BE LOCATED SUCH THAT THEY WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT STORM WATER QUALITY. OTHERWISE, COVERING OR ENCIRCLING THESE AREAS WITH SOME PROTECTIVE MEASURE WILL BE NECESSARY. 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RE-ESTABLISHING ANY EROSION CONTROL DEVICE WHICH THEY DISTURB. EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE ESTABLISHED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES THAT MAY LEAD TO UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE OR STORM WATER POLLUTION, SEDIMENTATION, OR OTHER POLLUTANTS. UNAUTHORIZED POLLUTANTS INCLUDE (BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO) EXCESS CONCRETE DUMPING OR CONCRETE RESIDUE, PAINTS, SOLVENTS, GREASES, FUEL AND LUBRICANT OIL PESTICIDES, AND ANY SOLID WASTE MATERIALS. 15. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ON THE PROJECT. 16. ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT. CHANGES ARE TO BE APPROVED BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER AND THE CITY OF EDINA ENGINEERING DMSION. 17. IF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN AS APPROVED CANNOT CONTROL EROSION AND OFF-SITE SEDIMENTATION FROM THE PROJECT, THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN WILL HAVE TO BE REVISED AND/OR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES WILL BE REQUIRED ON SITE. ANY REVISIONS TO THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN MADE BY THE CONTRACTOR MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. PAVING AND STRIPING NOTES 1. ALL PAVING, CONSTRUCTION. MATERIALS, AND WORKMANSHIP WITHIN JURISDICTION'S RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL OR COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS (LATEST EDITION) OR MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS (LATEST EDITION) IF NOT COVERED BY LOCAL OR COUNTY REGULATIONS. 2. ALL SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (M.U.T.C.D) AND CITY STANDARDS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR FIRE LANES, ROADWAY LANES, PARKING STALLS, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOLS, ACCESS AISLES, STOP BARS AND SIGNS, AND MISCELLANEOUS STRIPING WITHIN THE PARKING LOT AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 4. ALL EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL EXTEND THROUGH THE CURB. 5. THE MINIMUM LENGTH OF OFFSET JOINTS AT RADIUS POINTS SHALL BE 2 FEET. 6. ALL JOINTS, INCLUDING EXPANSION JOINTS WITH REMOVABLE TACK STRIPS, SHALL BE SEALED WITH JOINT SEALANT. 7. THE MATERIALS AND PROPERTIES OF ALL CONCRETE SHALL MEET THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN THE A.C.I. (AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE) MANUAL OF CONCRETE PRACTICE. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY A SECOND COATING OVER ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY OWNER FOLLOWED BY A COAT OF GLASS BEADS AS APPLICABLE PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 9. ANY EXISTING PAVEMENT, CURBS AND/OR SIDEWALKS DAMAGED OR REMOVED WILL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER AND OWNER. 10. BEFORE PLACING PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY SUITABLE ACCESSIBLE ROUTES (PER ADA). GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2%. IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 11. MAXIMUM JOINT SPACING IS TWICE THE DEPTH OF THE CONCRETE PAVEMENT IN FEET. GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL VERIFY THE SUITABILITY OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS INCLUDING GRADES AND DIMENSIONS BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE THE SITE TO THE ELEVATIONS INDICATED AND SHALL ADJUST 131/1P'S AS NECESSARY AND REGRADE WASHOUTS WHERE THEY OCCUR AFTER EVERY RAINFALL UNTIL A GRASS STAND IS WELL ESTABLISHED OR ADEQUATE STABILIZATION OCCURS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THERE IS POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS SO THAT SURFACE RUNOFF WILL DRAIN BY GRAVITY TO NEW OR EXISTING DRAINAGE OUTLETS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE NO PONDING OCCURS IN PAVED AREAS AND SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IF ANY GRADING DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND IN THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT OR UTILITIES. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL MANHOLE COVERS, VALVE COVERS, VAULT LIDS, FIRE HYDRANTS, POWER POLES, GUY WIRES, AND TELEPHONE BOXES THAT ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE AND UNDISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES TO REMAIN SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MATCH THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADES. 5. BACKFILL FOR UTILITY LINES SHALL BE PLACED PER DETAILS, STANDARDS, AND SPECIFICATIONS SO THAT THE UTILITY WILL BE STABLE. WHERE UTILITY LINES CROSS THE PARKING LOT, THE TOP 6 INCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED SIMILARLY TO THE REMAINDER OF THE LOT. UTILITY DITCHES SHALL BE VISUALLY INSPECTED DURING THE EXCAVATION PROCESS TO ENSURE THAT UNDESIRABLE FILL IS NOT USED. 6 CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF 4" OF TOPSOIL AT COMPLETION OF WORK ALL UNPAVED AREAS IN EXISTING RIGHTS-OF-WAY DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REGRADED AND SODDED. 7. AFTER PLACEMENT OF SUBGRADE AND PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL TEST AND OBSERVE PAVEMENT AREAS FOR EVIDENCE OF PONDING. ALL AREAS SHALL ADEQUATELY DRAIN TOWARDS THE INTENDED STRUCTURE TO CONVEY STORM RUNOFF. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY OWNER AND ENGINEER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE DISCOVERED. 8. WHERE EXISTING PAVEMENT IS INDICATED TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAW CUT FULL DEPTH FORA SMOOTH AND STRAIGHT JOINT AND REPLACE THE PAVEMENT WITH THE SAME TYPE AND DEPTH OF MATERIAL AS EXISTING OR AS INDICATED. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL PROTECTION OVER ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT BY THE OWNER. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE CLEANED OF DEBRIS AS REQUIRED DURING AND AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE FLOWS. 10. IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ANY APPLICABLE REQUIRED PERMITS. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH THE OWNER AND THE DESIGN ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 11. FIELD DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN AT INTERVALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY OR TO MN/DOT STANDARDS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 12. ALL SLOPES AND AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE GRADED AS PER PLANS. THE AREAS SHALL THEN BE SODDED OR SEEDED AS SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS, FERTILIZED, MULCHED, WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL HARDY GRASS GROWTH IS ESTABLISHED IN ALL AREAS. ANY AREAS DISTURBED FOR ANY REASON PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE JOB SHALL BE CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. ALL EARTHEN AREAS WILL BE SODDED OR SEEDED AND MULCHED AS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPING PLAN. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL OF DUST AND DIRT RISING AND SCATTERING IN THE AIR DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL PROVIDE WATER SPRINKLING OR OTHER SUITABLE METHODS OF CONTROL THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. 14. SOD, WHERE CALLED FOR, MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED ON EXPOSED SLOPES WITHIN 48 HOURS OF COMPLETING FINAL GRADING, AND AT ANY OTHER TIME AS NECESSARY, TO PREVENT EROSION, SEDIMENTATION OR TURBID DISCHARGES. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT LANDSCAPE ISLAND PLANTING AREAS AND OTHER PLANTING AREAS ARE NOT COMPACTED AND DO NOT CONTAIN ROAD BASE MATERIALS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO EXCAVATE AND REMOVE ALL UNDESIRABLE MATERIAL FROM ALL AREAS ON THE SITE TO RE PLANTED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF IN A LEGAL MANNER. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL UNDERGROUND STORM WATER PIPING PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND MWDOT SPECIFICATION. 17. ALL CONCRETE/ASPHALT SHALL BE INSTALLED PER GEOTECH REPORT, CITY OF EDINA AND MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. 18. SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO FLOWLINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 19. LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ARE TO THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON THE PLAN. 20. IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. 21. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND PROTECTING EXISTING UTILITIES, AND SHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES THAT OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT COMPENSATION. 22. BLEND NEW EARTHWORK SMOOTHLY TO TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING GRADE. 23. ALL PROPOSED GRADES ONSITE SHALL BE 31 OR FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. ANY SLOPES STEEPER THAN 41 REQUIRE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BLANKET. 24. ADHERE TO ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS NECESSARY IN THE GENERAL N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT AND STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGE ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 25 ADJUST AND/OR CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO ASSURE A SMOOTH FIT AND CONTINUOUS GRADE. 26. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE MINIMUM GRADES ARE MET WITHIN PAVED AREAS. 1.2% FOR ASPHALT PAVING AND 0.6% FOR CONCRETE PAVING. 3RD PARTY TEST REPORTS REQ'D TEST REPORTS REQUIRED FOR CLOSE OUT INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: - DENSITY TEST REPORTS - BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS OF WATER SYSTEM PRESSURE TEST OF WATER/SEWER - LEAK TESTS ON SEWER SYSTEM AND GREASE TRAPS -ANY OTHER TESTING REQUIRED BY THE AGENCY/MUNICIPALITY WATER STORM SEWER & SANITARY SEWER NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT GRAVITY SEWER LATERALS, MANHOLES, GRAVITY SEWER LINES, AND DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, MACHINERY, TOOLS, MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK IN FULL AND COMPLETE ACCORDANCE WITH THE SHOWN, DESCRIBED AND REASONABLY INTENDED REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT. THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 2. ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR UTILITY LOCATION AND COORDINATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NOTES CONTAINED IN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SECTION OF THIS SHEET. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL DISTURBED VEGETATION IN KIND, UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. 4. DEFLECTION OF PIPE JOINTS AND CURVATURE OF PIPE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. SECURELY CLOSE ALL OPEN ENDS OF PIPE AND FITTINGS WITH A WATERTIGHT PLUG WHEN WORK IS NOT IN PROGRESS. THE INTERIOR OF ALL PIPES SHALL BE CLEAN AND JOINT SURFACES WIPED CLEAN AND DRY AFTER THE PIPE HAS BEEN LOWERED INTO THE TRENCH. VALVES SHALL BE PLUMB AND LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE PLANS. 5 ALL PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE CAREFULLY STORED FOLLOWING MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THE COATING OR LINING IN ANY PIPE FITTINGS. ANY PIPE OR FITTING WHICH IS DAMAGED OR WHICH HAS FLAWS OR IMPERFECTIONS WHICH, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER OR OWNER, RENDERS IT UNFIT FOR USE, SHALL NOT BE USED. ANY PIPE NOT SATISFACTORY FOR USE SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED AND IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM THE JOB SITE, AND SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 6. WATER FOR FIRE FIGHTING SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO COMBUSTIBLES BEING BROUGHT ON SITE. 7. ALL UTILITY AND STORM DRAIN TRENCHES LOCATED UNDER AREAS TO RECEIVE PAVING SHALL BE COMPLETELY BACK FILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GOVERNING JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY'S SPECIFICATIONS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 8. UNDERGROUND LINES SHALL BE SURVEYED BY A STATE OF MN PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM, AT HIS OWN EXPENSE, ANY AND ALL TESTS REQUIRED BY THE SPECIFICATIONS AND/OR ANY AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. THESE TESTS MAY INCLUDE, BUT MAY NOT BE LIMITED TO, INFILTRATION AND EXFILTRATION, TELEVISION INSPECTION AND A MANDREL TEST ON GRAVITY SEWER. A COPY OF THE TEST RESULTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE UTILITY PROVIDER, OWNER AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY AS REQUIRED. 10 CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE OF 15 AND A VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 18" BETWEEN WATER AND SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES AND LINES. 11. IF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AS NECESSARY TO RETURN IT TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER. 12. ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED TO ASSURE CONNECTION AT STRUCTURE IS WATERTIGHT UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED BY CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 13. UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED IN CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, ALL STORM SEWER MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT, AND SHALL HAVE TRAFFIC BEARING RING d COVERS. MANHOLES IN UNPAVED AREAS SHALL BE 6' ABOVE FINISH GRADE. LIDS SHALL BE LABELED 'STORM SEWER'. EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MEET THESE CONDITIONS AND THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE. 14. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY LAND SURVEYORS. IF THE CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, THEN THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY, AT THEIR EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW. 16. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. 16. ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH UNIFORM POURED MORTAR FROM INVERT IN TO INVERT OUT. 17. ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO STORM SEWER BY PREFABRICATED WYES OR AT STORM STRUCTURES. ROOF DRAINS AND TRUCK WELL DRAIN SHALL RUN AT A MINIMUM 1% SLOPE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, AND TIE IN AT THE CENTERLINE OF THE STORM MAIN. 18. ALL ROOF AND SANITARY SEWER DRAINS SHALL BE INSULATED IF 7' OF COVER CANNOT BE PROVIDED. 19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES THAT ARE TO REMAIN FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. 20. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND OTHER ABOVE AND BELOW-GRADE IMPROVEMENTS ARE APPROXIMATE AS SHOWN. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATIONS OF EACH PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 21. A MINIMUM OF 5' SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN UTILITIES AND TREES UNLESS A ROOT BARRIER IS UTILIZED. 22. GAS, PHONE AND ELECTRIC SERVICES SHOWN FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. DRY UTILITY COMPANIES MAY ALTER THE DESIGN LAYOUT DURING THEIR REVIEW. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE FINAL DESIGN AND INSTALLATION WITH UTILITY COMPANIES. 23. COORDINATE UTILITY INSTALLATION WITH IRRIGATION DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. 24. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FLOW LINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PERIMETER WALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO INSIDE WALL FACE. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT WALL WIDTH AND SPECIFICATIONS. 25. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS). FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS, AND MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS. 26. REFERENCE M.E.P. PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 27. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE STRUCTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS AND PAD PREPARATION SPECIFICATIONS. 28. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE M.E.P PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR LIGHT POLE WIRING. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT NO. 82100387 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 1101 HAMPSHIRE AVENUE S MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55438 DATED 4/02/2021 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA• APR 1 2 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT SHEET NUMBER C100 TREE REMOVAL (TOP) TREE REMOVAL (TOP.) LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (TYP.) CURB REMOVAL (IVP.) ASPHALT _ REMOVAL PROPOSED Iv -0 SAWCUT UNE (TOP.) DEMOLITION PLAN NOTES PROPERTY LINE REMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACE REMOVE CONCRETE SURFACE REMOVE BUILDING CLEARING S GRUBBING FULL DEPTH SAWCUT REMOVE TREE 3on X //////////// • REMOVE CONCRETE CURBS GUTTER • X•X•X•X•X•X•X • REMOVE UTILITY LINES PLANNING DEPARTMENT EXISTING SIGN EXISTING FLARED END SECTION EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING STORM CATCHBASIN CITY OF EDINt EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING POST INDICATOR VALVE EXISTING WELL APR 12 2021 EXISTING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER EXISTING ROOF DRAIN EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HYDRANT EXISTING METAL COVER EXISTING ELECTRICAL METER EXISTING AIR CONDITIONER EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE EXISTING CABLE BOX EXISTING GUY PARE EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING TREE EXISTING TREE LINE 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSAL (IN A LOCATION APPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES) ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS, FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS, PARKING, DRIVES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC. SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PLANS CAN BE CONSTRUCTED. ALL FACIUTIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLE MATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSING THE DEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER_ THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PERMIT AND RECEIPTS OF DISPOSAL OF MATERIALS TO THE OWNER AND OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL UTILITY SERVICES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES. UTILITY SERVICES SHALL NOT BE INTERRUPTED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND COORDINATION WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES ARDOR THE CITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WTH RESPECTIVE UTIUTY COMPANIES PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE %MTH 7HE UTILITY COMPANY CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY COMPANYS FORCES AND AN FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO THE UTILITY COMPANY FOR THEIR SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION TREE REMOVAL (TOP.) CLEAR AND GRUB (TOP.) CLEAR AND GRUB (TYP.) CURB REMOVAL (TYP.) PROPOSED SAWCUT LINE (TYP.) EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION CURB REMOVAL (TYP) REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE ASPHALT REMOVAL REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS -"" PAVEMENT MARKINGS rr ir; *V1411111r .#7Z1 z _ _ REMOVE STARS AND RAILING REMOVE EXISTING ---1-1W SPRINKLER SYSTEM TREE REMOVAL(TYP.) S. EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO BE REMOVED EXISTING STORM SEN/ER TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION — - - — _ 70TH STREET WEST (BO FOOT WOE PUBUG RIGHT Cr WAY) ELECTRICAL. TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC, AND/OR GAS UNES NEEDING TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A S/AOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO EXISTING UTIUTIES WITHIN ANY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION. B CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBIJC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES, ENCLOSURES, ETC (AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES) AS APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE COORDINATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH EDINA 'COUNTY> COUNTY AND MN/DOT. 9 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ACCESS TO ALL ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION. AND SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTIES IF ACCESS WU. BE INTERRUPTED OR ALTERED AT ANY TIME DURING CONSTRUCTION 10. PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OCCURRING, ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED. 11. CONTRACTOR MAY LIMIT SAW-CUT AND PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHERE IT IS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS INCURRED ON ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS REMOVAL AND REPAIR 12 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WATER MAIN WORK NUN ME FIRE DEPT. AND THE CITY WATER DEPARTMENT TO PLAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION IS CONSTANTLY AVAILABLE TO ME SITE THROUGHOUT THIS SPECIFIC WORK AND THROUGH ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING/PROVIDING ANY REQUIRED WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WIN 7HE CITY OF EDINA DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION VALI BE PROVIDED. 13 REFER TO SURVEY FOR ALL EXISTING INVERT AND RIM ELEVATIONS 14 ALL UTILITIES SHOWN ARE EXISTING UTILITIES 15 IN THE EVENT A WELL IS FOUND, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER IMMEDIATELY. ALL WELLS SHALL BE SEALED BY A LICENSED WELL CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE OF MN REQUIREMENTS. 15. IN THE EVENT THAT UNKNOWN CONTAINERS OR TANKS ARE ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE OWNER AND/OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY. ALL CONTAINERS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF ATA PERMITTED LANDFILL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF ANY EXISTING DRAINTILE IS ENCOUNTERED ON SITE. NO ACTIVE DRAINTILE SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER. LEGEND FILL & ABANDON UTIUTY LINES GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 10 20 40 REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) li CONCRETE REMOVAL LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (TYP.) EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED SAWCUT LINE (TYP.) UMITS OF. DISTURBANCE (TYP.) (1 CURB REMOVAL (TYP.) EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN -AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION EXISTING PEDESTRIAN RAMP TO REMAIN AND BE -- 4 PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED SAWCUT LINE (TYP-) ls CONCRETE REMOVAL CL EAR AND — GRUB (TOP) REMOVE EXISTING —.-- PAVEMENT MARKINGS )is EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN — AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) • CURB REMOVAL (TOP.) 5) ASPHALT REMOVAL REMOVE EXISTING SIGNAGE EXISTING UTILITIES TO BE REMOVED TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) I I ILII _ EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION CONCRETE EXISTING STORM SEWER TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED I, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION N ' EXISTING SANITARY ) SEWER EASEMENT • —NZ — — — — REMOVE EXISTING SIGNAGE EXISTING PEDESTRIAN RAMP TO REMAIN AND RE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (TYP.) PROPOSED SAWCUT UNE I (TNT.) LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (TYR) s'& -1, &V"' 1> 4'0'4' 'V " ' V"' 0 4.4._ ~'REMOVE EXISTING V . _ •.— .., REMOVE EXISTING !VP.) GAS METER CLEAR AND ? 4,,, ,:...* TRANSFORMER 0 1 0 ; TREE REMOVAL (TOP.) J. .,., 0 ‘,,,, REMOVE EXIS-TING / PAVEMENT MARKINGS N >t TREE REMOVAL (TYP ) CONCRETE REMOVAL ,t ,ar ' .1167:43V PTREE R AL (TY .) ' ro...i, re CURB REMOVAL (TYP.) O !NTS OF STURSANGE (TYP.) — — PROPOSED SAWCUT UNE (TYP.) GAS TEL CIV EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING CURBS GUTTER UMITS OF CONSTRUCTION EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE EXISTING J-BARRIER EXISTING RETAINING WALL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAN EXISTING GAS MAIN EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ASPHALT REMOVAL (04,956V1) — TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (TYP.) TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) 6 THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACCURACY. PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE UTILITY COMPANIES FOR LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ALL AREAS OF PROPOSED WORK_ 6 ALL EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACT LOCATION, OR AS ANY OBSTACLES THAT MAY OCCUR ON THE SITE VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY ANTICIPATED FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING DESTRUCTION AND REMOVAL OF ALL SERVICE LINES AND CAP ALL LINES BEFORE PRECEDING MATH THE WORK 0.0.0.0.0 • • . • • • _ O—ELC wozosmonreinzaao 1 /////J I' 2 I— z WC u) ce 0 w Z 1.1 L 1 LT, fI, a. a EDINA MULTIFAMILY SHEET NUMBER C200 K \TWC_LDEV \LUPE DEVELOPMENTEdina Multifamily \ 3 DesigMCAMPlanSheets\C2-DEMO PLAN dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:07am K: \TVVC_LDEV \ LUPE DEVELOPMENTEdina Multifamily \3 Design \CAD \PlanSheets\L1-TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERVATION PLAN.dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:07am LEGEND X X PROPERTY LINE TREE TO REMAIN TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING VEGETATION EDGE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION TREE PROTECTION FENCE TREE MITIGATION DATA PROTECTED TREE REMOVAL: 18 TREES -71 PROTECTED TREE MITIGATION REQUIRED: 2 TREES *.1 'PROTECTED TREES MAY BE REMOVED WITHOUT MITIGATION WITHIN 10 FOOT RADIUS OF BUILDING PAD, DECK OR PATIO OF A NEW OR REMODELED BUILDING, WITHIN 5 FOOT RADIUS OF DRIVEWAYS AND PARKING AREAS, WITHIN 10 FOOT RADIUS OF INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS. 'PROTECTED TREES MUST BE REPLACED HATH ONE TREE OF SIMILAR SPECIES. TREE PROTECTION NOTES 1. PRUNING WILL BE DONE BY PROFESSIONALS DURING APPROPRIATE PRUNING SEASON. // NO STORAGE OF MATERIALS, OPERATION OF MACHINERY, OR DEVELOPMENT OF ANY SORT WILL OCCUR WITHIN THE FENCE-LINE WITHOUT APPROVAL IN WRITING FROM CITY. 3. SITE GRADING TO BE DONE ONLY AFTER PROTECTIVE MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN, CITY HAS APPROVED FENCING LOCATIONS, AND ALL CONTRACTORS HAVE BEEN BREIFED ON TREE PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES. 5 EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN OR REMOVED TO BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED, WITHIN DISTURBANCE LIMITS AND 10' OUTSIDE OF THE DISTURBANCE LIMITS. 5. TREE PRESERVATION TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER AND PER LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY. KEYNOTE LEGEND PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY BUILDING 118 UNITS FFE: 871.00 P1 FFE: 859.00 1 0 0 EXISTING TREE TO BE SAVED (TYP.) EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (TYP.) TREE PROTECTION FENCE (SEE DETAIL) (TYP.) Il ts 15 NOTE: ONLY SIGNIFICANT TREES IN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SHOWN ON PLAN/ INVENTORY. DRIP LINE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS TREE PROTECTION SIGN 3 TAG A SPECIES CAL IN. / HT. STATUS REQUIRES REPLACEMENT 1 DECIDUOUS 18 IN. REMOVED YES 2 DECIDUOUS 8 IN. REMOVED NO 3 DECIDUOUS 24 IN. REMOVED NO 4 DECIDUOUS 12 IN. REMOVED NO 5 DECIDUOUS 10 IN. REMOVED NO 6 DECIDUOUS 14 IN. REMOVED NO 7 DECIDUOUS 14 IN. REMOVED NO 8 DECIDUOUS 24 IN. REMOVED NO 0 DECIDUOUS 24 IN. REMOVED NO ID DECIDUOUS 15IN. REMOVED NO 1 DECIDUOUS 181N. REMOVED NO 12 DECIDUOUS 15 IN. REMOVED NO 13 DECIDUOUS 15 IN. REMOVED NO 14 DECIDUOUS 24 IN. REMOVED NO 5 DECIDUOUS 15 IN. REMOVED NO 16 DECIDUOUS 24 IN. SAVED NO 17 DECIDUOUS 20 IN. REMOVED NO 18 DECIDUOUS 14 IN. REMOVED NO 19 DECIDUOUS 15 IN. REMOVED YES >- LL Z ° LO I— I= Z < z LLI 1-1 > • Z 2.1 Z st( LLJ eL — w Lu LU • eL :A I a a * • a * * * • * a a a * * a 2 CITY OF EDINA APR 1 2 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT FURNISH AND INSTALL TEMPORARY FENCE AT THE TREE'S DRIPLINE OR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AS SPECIFIED, PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. MEN POSSIBLE PLACE FENCE 25 FEET BEYOND THE DRIP LINE. PLACE PROTECTION SIGNS ALONG FENCE AT 20' INTERVALS. 70TH STREET WEST TEMPORARY TREE PROTECTION FENCE PLACEMENT EDINA MULTIFAMILY SCALE: N.T.S. C300 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION z SHEET NUMBER C300 68,634 SF (1.57 AC) PROPOSED PROPERTY BUILDING AREA 31,446 SF (45.8% OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA) SURFACE ADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED 1 STALLS / 1 STALLS 4 STALLS / 4 STALLS UNDERGROUND ADA STALLS RUM / PROVIDED CITY OF EDINA CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTIUDES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS S POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY EGAN, FIELDS NOWAK INC, DATED 02/02/2021. APR 1 2 2021 7. EDINA MULTIFAMILY K: \TWC_LDEV \ LUPE DEVELOPMENTEdina Multifamily \ 3 Design \CAMPlanSheets C4-SITE PLAN.dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:07am PROPOSED SURFACE PARKING 24 STALLS LEGEND PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED FENCE SETBACK LINE RETAINING WALL PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPERTY SUMMARY EDINA MULTIFAMILY TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 88,634 SF (1.57 AC) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 50,836 SF (1.16 AC) PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 17,798 SF (0.41 AC) TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 68,634 SF (1.57 AC) ZONING SUMMARY EXISTING ZONING PCO-3 (PLANNEDCOMMERCIAL) PROPOSED ZONING PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) PARKING SETBACKS ROAD = 10' BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT = 35' SIDE = 10' REAR = 10' BUILDING DATA SUMMARY AREAS PARKING KEYNOTE LEGEND 10. PARKING SETBACK O --- rrr 7 4 3.5' BUILDING SETBACK GARDEN RAIN • • Z.• r rrr :r/ rrr ,=0 •• p LARGE BLOCK RETAINING WALL. 1 DESIGNED BY OTHERS. . CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SHOP J DRAWINGS FOR ENGINEERS REVIEW AND APPROVAL. COLOR TO BE SPECIFIED BY OWNER Kr BUILDING SETBACK ? , PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY BUILDING - 118 UNITS * * * 0 CONCRETE SIDEWALK ® 6' CONCRETE FILLED PIPE BOLLARD 0 MATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURBS GUTTER O ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP OE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN O ACCESSIBLE PARKING O AREA STRIPED BATH SYSL 45' 2 O.C. O STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT OI LANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS O TRUNCATED DOME RAMP OK HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT O 8612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.) OM TRANSITION CURB NO FLAT CURB 0 4' ALUMINUM PICKET FENCE • CONCRETE PAVEMENT 10 PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK 1 SPACE/4 RESIDENTS BASED ON MAXIMUM CAPACITY OF THE BUILDING, PLUS ONE SPACE/EMPLOYEE ON THE MAJOR SHIFT, PLUS ONE SPACE PER VEHICLE OWNED BY THE BUILDING'S MANAGEMENT VI REQUIRED PARKING * * * PROPOSED UNDERGROUND PARKING 86 STALLS SITE PLAN NOTES 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS AND CODES AND OSHA STANDARDS. 2 CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT PORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS RAIN COMMUNITY • GARDEN * * * * * 3 ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 3' AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE ID UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE F. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. S. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. MALEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR OMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 8 TOTAL LAND AREA IS 1 57 AC RES PLANNING DEPARTMENT PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS SIGNS ARE SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZE LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH/ MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN 11. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWSE 12 REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS. 11 REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS 14. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. IS ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. IS ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9' IN WIDTH AND 18' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 17. THERE ARE <XXX> ACRES OF WETLAND IMPACTS. 18 FOR OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS, SEE THE <OFFSITE PLANS> IMPROVEMENTS PLANS. CONCRETE PAD FOR PUBUC ART. ART PIECE TO BE SUPPLIED BY OWNER. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • * * * * T\'- LILEZG SETBACK b * * * ITEM 5 * * * 11(11fi h.- 10 I BUILDING SETBACK - - 70TH STREET WEST (CA PC.S L PE 5:OS1- ,4,) z 0 H 0 LL 0 40 —I 0_ 2 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET — 0 10 20 J 0 +I — % —X-1-- SHEET NUMBER C400 871 00 00 871.00 I I I II 9.8.1 )1 ft 71. P.1E 8654 /1)/./ (ME864 89)-)7186E-867 92 ST-7 R 1/ 7 I 7,1U, PROPOSE a RAIN GARD N SURFACE IE: 865.43 ENGINEERED SOIL MEDINDRAINTILEIE: 861.85 YEAR H • 881.8 ST-15 RE 865 43 IE'.661.57 SW 7 IE 861.7 NE/ Ij O CIEIED(X). 21 LF 15. 4,41 (G 868 55 1E 64 09 1E 864 00 NE I G8)033 •-•:: 1 47% 10). 866.58 1-> II, • ST-6 /1741 • 41..M.9 RE 867.51 , 6). .\\ ,,, 3 1E861.96 NE, 0 0E09 1E-862.06 SE / ,7:862200 -- , 32 17 - 29 LF - 17 00.76% ST-19 RE868 36 17 /4 I/ 1E86362 NW / ST-3 /463.64 G.667 1E863,66 E ,L, 1E863.52 S '1, RE 866 03 1E862 22 5 \,......__ ._,,_... ,... 78.6??? NW OEM) G 866 29 ,.......__.*:1 49' LF- 12' ®070% ST-21 1E663 68 SW 79 LF - 15 0650% G 866 17 0" CHAMBER INFILT. SYSTE BOTTOM OF CHAMBER: 881.25 00-YEAR I-11A,L• 884 92 ,/ ST-2 IE 86222 N- 4 LF 151 @ 000% G 865.80) ST-S RE 86727 '1E863 84 SE 11 LF ST-20 1E863 °*%-roL, 61 LF 131 fl_ e \ (0 858.90 870.56) ST 12 87077IE 866 00 W 871.00 (5559.00 ( 8 70 6 7) G 859 INV 871 CO BW 859.53 PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY BUILDING 118 UNITS FFE: 871.00 P1 FFE: 859.00 3- 7 196 LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR 925 PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) • PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) 0 PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT r:o PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER 00.00 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION L1(11:73)- PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION GOD(-11 PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION T60(); PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION MCd9X .' PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION (ffFA)3 PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW 0 0% PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION 000% PROPOSED ADA SLOPE GRADING PLAN NOTES 1 ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF EDINA SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ <1-800-252-1166> AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS 3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM 0-76 HOPE 0' - 112. PER AASHTO 91-252 HDPE OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM 13-1785 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM 0261, 0-990, AND C-443 HOPE PER ASTM 3212 PVC PER ASTM 123034, JOINTS PER ASTM 123212 4. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF MAY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. I GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE 9 ALL EXCESS MATERIAL BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. ID. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION 11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB ANO GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE 869 32 ,R0 S D RAIN GARD ISURFACE IE: 889.00 ENGINEERED SOIL IMEDINDRAINTILE IE: 864.00 1 i 1130-YEAR FIWL: 866. 8 10 (871.00 z \ A j 12 INSTALL A MINIMUM OF <41 CLASS 5> AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS 13 UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF <41 OF TOPSOIL>. 14 ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15 GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2%. IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED MC IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR MULES EXCEED 2% (t 5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR ADA COMPLIANCE ISSUES 5:87011 • .80 T3' I A 10 88 LTJ -K 7 16. 17. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 05% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE INSULATION BY 5' WOE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF LESS THAN 4. OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS. II 871 00 ) tl~N N III 7870 06 Fro V 70TH ST-REET WEST - - -------- - 87/00 ,--(871.00) {4871.00 10 ROOF DRAIN S-WERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX XX> OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION 10 ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING MANHOLE CONNECTIONS. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE MR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE OATH THE CURRENT PLUMBING CODE 21. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 125% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. 22 CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT 'INFALL CURB. WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND 'OUTFALL' CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER. CITY OF EDINA APR 1 2 2021 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 10 20 40 11 I PLANNING DEPARTMENT • m E 069.07 66964--( 868 42 786802) ••\ 0 I- CC 0 UN u_ I- z - a_ KATVVC_LDEV \ LUPE DEVELOPMENT\Edina Multifamily \ 3 Design \CAD \PlanSheets \CS-GRADING PLAN.dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:07am „ = g >% O `; ki CU L115,WN E z In o w • J z z• 0 Qa a g '41 O cc EDINA MULTIFAMILY I- a2 u) _ re 0 Lu 2 Z O LU a wl < LU a. a SHEET NUMBER C500 K:\TNC_LDEV\LUPE DEVELOPMENTEdina Multifamily \3 Design \CAMPlanSheets \C6-UTILITY PLAN.dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:08am EDINA MULTIFAMILY LEGEND EXISTING 1-7-1 8 0 IV O IY PROPOSED • GATE VALVE 4▪ - HYDRANT REDUCER )14 TEE 0 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE Ig) SANITARY CLEANOUT WATERMAN 11119 SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER STORM SEWER ELC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC COM TELEPHONE OAS GASMAN UTILITY PLAN NOTES 1 ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE, AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED UTILITIES 2 SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BEM FOLLOWS B' PVC SDR35 PER ASTM 5-3034, FOR PIPES LESS THAN 12 DEEP B' PVC SOR26 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES MORE THAN 17 DEEP 6' PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM 04785 DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWNA C150 3 WATER IJ NES SHALL BEM FOLLOWS. 6. AND LARGER, PVC C-900 PER ASTM D 2241 CLASS 200 UNDER COUNTY ROADS, OTHERWISE CLASS 150 4. MD LARGER DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA CI80 SMALLER THAN 3. PIPING SHALL BE COPPER TUBE TYPE 'R PER ANSI 816 22 OR PVC, 200 P S I • PER ASTM 01764 AND D2241. 4 MINIMUM TRENCH MINH SHALL BE 2 FEET 5 ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS PATH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUST BLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR M INDICATED IN THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS 6 ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN ocr) APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE OR STRUCTURE). 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF T-F COVER ON ALL WATERLINES 8. IN THE EVENT OFA VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES, STORM LINES AND GAS LINES, OR ANY OBSTRUCTION (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) THE SANITARY LINE SHALL BE SCH 400R C900 PATH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 113. VERTICAL SEPARATION. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR ANSI 21 11 (AWWA 0151) (CLASS 50) B. LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE BAC KEELING. CI PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY BUILDING 118 UNITS FFE: 871.00 P1 FFE: 859.00 10 TOPS OF MANHOLES SHALL BE RAISED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS, AND TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS, IN GREEN AREAS, WITH WATERTIGHT LIDS 11. ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSION STRENGTH AT 3000 P.SI. 12. EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY NEW LINES 13. REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES 14. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF EDINA AND/OR STATE OF MN WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION OF THE WATER AND SEWER UNES II 15. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE_ THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTIUTY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS ffi 18. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES. 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS 18 CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN A 19 BACKFLOW DEVICES (DOCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) AND METERS ARE LOCATED IN THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. REF. ARCH / MEP PLANS. 20 ALL ONSITE WATERMAINS AND SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED. A 21. ALL WATERMAN STUBOUTS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED WITH REACTION BLOCKING. n DATA CONDUITS (SEE ARCH PLANS) 554 IE 858 25 S PROPOSED GAS METER LOCATION (SEE ARCH. PLANS) PROPOSED WATER METER-, REMOTE READ LOCATION (SEE ARCH. PLANS) CITY OF EDINA APR 12 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ELECTRICAL METER PANEL LOCATION (SEE ARCH. PLANS) TRANSFORMER SWITCH (ELS) (SEE ARCH. PLANS) rt 10' WATER SERVICE to,e4 1E858.07 N IE 848.55 W IE 046 05 E CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM LOCATION OF INVERTS II --- CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE TELECOM CONNECTION PATH TELECOM PROVIDER -7---1 , , CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ELECTRICAL CONNECTION WITH . - . EXISTING ELECTRICAL HAND HOLE ' .- CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE GAS CONNECTION HATH GAS PROVIDER CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAN. COORDINATE REQUIRED SHUTOFF WITH CITY. 70TH STREET WEST GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 10 20 40 (99 9- 11,1 EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT 1 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NUMBER C600 PICEA GLAUCA 'DENSATK BHS SYRINGA RETICULATA JTL RVB 6 BETULA NIGRA SIZE 6' HT. SIZE 6' HT. 6' HT. SIZE CONT CAL B&B CONT CAL B&B B&B CONT CAL B & B 2.5" CAL. B&B 2.5' CAL. CONT SPACING SIZE CONT SPACING SIZE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONIFEROUS SHRUBS CODE QTY 0 GOJ 16 TAU 14 C TGA 13 JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA 'GREY OWL' TAXUS X MEDIA 'TAUNTONII' THUJA OCCIDENTALIS 'BAILJOHN' TM BDP 30 BLC 19 GLS 39 LON 55 LQF 16 SEM 60 SYRINGA X 'SMSJBP7' TM AROMA MELANOCARPA 'IROQUOIS BEAUTY' TM RHUS AROMATICA 'GRO-LOW PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS 'DONNA MAY' TM HYDRANGEA PANICULATA 'SMHPLQF' TM SORBARIA SORBIFOLIA 'SEM' 149 RUDBECKIA FULGIDA 'GOLDSTURM' BES NEPETA X FAASSENII 'KIT KAT' SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS ECHINACEA X 'POW WOW WILDBERRY' HEMEROCALLIS X 'ROSY RETURNS' KKC 95 PDS 29 PWW 18 RRD 41 AST BLU BLV 52 ASTER NOVAE-ANGLIAE 35 SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM 42 VERBENA HASTATA OXE PBS 42 HELIOPSIS HELIANTHOIDES 147 LIATRIS PYCNOSTACHYA #5 CONT. 4' O.C. #5 CONT. GREY OWL JUNIPER #5 CONT. 4' O.C. TAUTON YEW #5 CONT. 4' O.C. TECHNITO GLOBE ARBORVITAE #5 CONT. 3' O.C. COMMON NAME CONT SPACING SIZE DWARF RED TWIG DOGWOOD BLOOMERANG DARK PURPLE LILAC #5 CONT. 4' O.C. #5 CONT. 4' O.C. #5 CONT. #5 CONT. 3' O.C. CONT SIZE SPACING 18' OC 81 CONT GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC LITTLE DEVIL NINEBARK LITTLE QUICK FIRE HYDRANGEA SEM FALSESPIREA COMMON NAME BLACK-EYED SUSAN #1 CONT 18' O.C. CONT SIZE SPACING FLAT 2' PLUGS 36' OC FLAT 2' PLUGS 36' OC FLAT 2' PLUGS 36' OC FLAT 2' PLUGS 18' OC FLAT 2" PLUGS 36" OC KIT KAT CATMINT #1 CONT 18" OC PRAIRIE DROPSEED #1 CONT 24" OC POW WOW VVILDBERRY CONEFLOWER #1 CONT 24" OC ROSY RETURNS DAYLILY COMMON NAME NEW ENGLAND ASTER LITTLE BLUESTEM GRASS BLUE VERVAIN JOE PYE WEED OX-EYE SUNFLOWER PRAIRIE BLAZINGSTAR FIAT 18" OC 53 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA 'KARL FOERSTER' KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS #1 CONT KFG 4- LDN RRD 2- BOP 5- TGA 4- LDN 15 BES PL K \TVVC_LDEV\ LUPE DEVELOPMENTEdina Multifamily \ 3 Design \CAD\PlanSheets\ L1-LANDSCAPE PLAN.dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:08am 2-RTD 24 - JPW 3 - RVB 9- OXE 6 - AST 3-RTO 3 - BLU 4- OXE 14 - PBS 5 - BLV 29 - JPW 2 - RID LANDSCAPE LEGEND PLANT SCHEDULE CONIFEROUS TREE 0 ORNAMENTAL TREE OVERSTORY TREE RAIN GARDEN 0 CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME ABM 2 GSL 1 CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME RTD 33 CORNUS SERICEA 'BAILADELINE' COMMON NAME BLACK HILLS SPRUCE COMMON NAME JAPANESE TREE LILAC CLUMP RIVER BIRCH MULTI-TRUNK COMMON NAME AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE GREENSPIRE LITTLELEAF LINDEN COMMON NAME FIREDANCE RED TWIG DOGWOOD #5 CONT. 4' O.C. EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.) EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE (TYP.) EXISTING SHRUB (TYP.) EDGER (TYP.) APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD I IRRIGATION, SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.) SEEDI SOD EDGE (TYP.) 15 JPW 2 - RTD 3 - RVB 5 - BLV 8 - OXE 16 - JPW 3 - RTO 9 - AST 4 - BLV 5 - BLU 2 - RTD 18 - PBS "e'C • .47 --o _o iffr ° eimee000c,0004ye•Hre0000ecooveee*, triPA cailv (4.re ' 3 - AST 5 - BLV 4- OXE 4 - AST 6 - BLU 3 - BLV 29 - PBS 32 - JPW 5-LQF 3 -ACD 4-SEM 4 - SEM 3 -ACD NUM 3 - LQF 2 - BOP m_ I. ROCK MULCH (TYP.) COMMUNITY GARDEN AREA- DETAILS TED REVISIONS 18 - PBS 6 - AST 4 - RTD 5 - BLV 6- OXE 7 - BLU 35 - PBS 29 - JPW 9 - AST 23 - JPW 3 - BLC 0 g.g 2 -GOJ 00 9 - RRD 5 - LDN 6" f04 5 ll'oy 1 K9 - TGA 4/ ,c44,44.Weiralirtreko Ntorgrolevreasitr ,--,g, tett:11 70TH STREET WEST PO FOOT WOE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY) DECIDUOUS SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME ACD 6 CORNUS SERICEA 'ALLEMAN'S COMPACT CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME CODE DIV BOTANICAL NAME JPW 226 EUPATORIUM MACULATUM LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS TREES REQUIRED: 26 TREES = 1,039 FEET PERIMETER / 40 TREES PROVIDED: 26 TREES OFF-STREET PARKING SCREENING: MUST BE 4 FEET ABOVE LEVEL OF PARKING LOT WITH MINIMUM OPACITY OF 90 PERCENT YEAR ROUND. IROQUOIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRY #5 CONT. 4' O.C. 30" OC NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 10 20 40 IMMMI z I-z ELu o_g (f) Lij o• 0 '<cc Pu" 0 g W a. < 0 SHEET NUMBER L100 61 - BES 31 - KKC 22 - GLS 2 - BDP 5- LDNI 12 - KKC - BES `a' PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY BUILDING 118 UNITS 12 -KKC FFE: 871.00 12 -BES P1 FFE: 859.00 7-SEM 5-LDN m ▪ —3-LDN PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1-ABM 12 - GLS LANDSCAPE KEYNOTES OA O EDGER (TYP.) O DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.) O ROCK MULCH (TYP.) 0 SOD (TYP.) EDINA MULTIFAMILY 2 - BHS 3 - BDP 2 - LON 4-GOJ 3-BDP111 7- PDS,11 • 2 - JTL 111 10- LDN 11 T, I 4- GOJ 2 - BHS 2 - LDN 3 - BDP 5 - SEM 9-PDS 2-TAU 3-BDP Weif FENCING - SEE ARCH AND CML PLANS ti 3 - LDN 2 - BHS 3 - BLC 4 - SEM 5- PW/V 3 - BDP 3 - BLC ;ITY OF EDINA APR 1 2 2021 \NNING DEPARTMENT A 2 - BHS 2- GOJ 3 - BDP 12 - KKC 4 - SEM 3 - BLC 3 - LDN 3 - BOP 2 - TAU 5 - SEM 13 - RRD • n n n ACER X FREEMANII 'AUTUMN BLAZE' TILIA CORDATA 'GREENSPIRE' 0 0 0 0 0 0 PERENNIALS RAIN GARDEN iii . Mat rrz EDINA MULTIFAMILY 5 I- z w E (i) a ce ce O 111 Z a- w- g_ 0- g a NOTES: LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2. PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING. 3. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED PLANTING SOIL. INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR UP TO 2' ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE WITH BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), INTACT. 4. SLIT REMAINING TREATED BURLAP AT 6" INTERVALS. 5. BACKFILL TO WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12" OF THE TOP OF THE ROOTBALL, THEN WATER PLANT. REMOVE THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO HORIZONTAL RINGS WHICHEVER IS GREATER. REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROM THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS. 6. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL 7. WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 8. BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME. 9. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 10. FINAL LOCATION OF TREE TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER. 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. 2. ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS. ON CENTER SPACING AS STATED ON PLAN. 3. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 4. ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. 6. ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING. CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3. NOTES: 7. PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. 8. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES. 9. PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. 1. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2. PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING OF TOP AND ROOT. 3. REMOVE CONTAINER AND SCORE OUTSIDE OF SOIL MASS TO REDIRECT AND PREVENT CIRCLING FIBROUS ROOTS. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS. 4. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL 5. WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 6. BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME. 7. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 8. MIX IN 3-4" OF ORGANIC COMPOST. 10. PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 11. OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS. SHRUB / PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL L101 L101 SCALE: N.T.S 12. PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. 13. WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST. 14. STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. 15. THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. 16. BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW) AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS. MULCH AT PLANTING AREA CITY OF EDINA APR 1 2 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 17. MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS. PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" DEPTH DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND COLORED RED, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE BUFF LIMESTONE, 1 1/2" TO 3" DIAMETER, AT MINIMUM 3" DEPTH, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 18. EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE COL-MET (OR EQUAL) STEEL EDGING; 3/16" THICK, COLOR BLACK, OR SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. STEEL EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND STAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH TOP OF EDGER AT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDNIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, OR RAIN-GARDEN BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 19. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PARKING LOT ISLANDS TO BE SODDED WITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH AROUND ALL TREES AND SHRUBS. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. SEED AS SPECIFIED AND PER MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. L101 20. PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS. AS-BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 21. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR. 22. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 23. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. 24. RAIN GARDEN NOTE: PROVIDE AND INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AT RAIN GARDEN AREA SIDE SLOPES AFTER ALL PLANTING HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. BLANKET TO BE ONE SEASON GEOJUTE, MN/DOT CATEGORY 2 (STRAW 1S, WOOD FIBER 1S), OR APPROVED EQUAL. BLANKET TO BE OVERLAPPED BY 4" AND ANCHORED BY SOD STAPLES. PLACE BLANKET PERPENDICULAR TO THE SLOPE. TRENCH IN EDGES OF BLANKET AREA TO PREVENT UNDER MINING. PROVIDE SILT FENCE AT TOP OF SLOPE AS NEEDED. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO MATCH OTHER PROJECT PLANTING MULCH. PLACE 4" DEPTH OF MULCH AT ALL PLANTING AND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AREA (NO FILTER FABRIC). SEE RAIN GARDEN DETAIL FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. RAIN GARDEN TO PROVIDE PROPER INFILTRATION AND DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS PER ENGINEERS APPROVAL 25. MAINTAIN TREES, SHRUBS, AND OTHER PLANTS UNTIL PROJECT COMPLETION, BUT IN NO CASE, LESS THAN FOLLOWING PERIOD; 1 YEAR AFTER PROJECT COMPLETION. MAINTAIN TREES, SHRUBS, AND OTHER PLANTS BY PRUNING, CULTIVATING, AND WEEDING AS REQUIRED FOR HEALTHY GROWTH. RESTORE PLANTING SAUCERS. TIGHTEN AND REPAIR STAKE AND GUY SUPPORTS AND RESET TREES AND SHRUBS TO PROPER GRADES OR VERTICAL POSITION AS REQUIRED. RESTORE OR REPLACE DAMAGED WRAPPINGS. SPRAY AS REQUIRED TO KEEP TREES AND SHRUBS FREE OF INSECTS AND DISEASE. REPLENISH MULCH TO THE REQUIRED DEPTH. MAINTAIN LAWNS FOR 45 DAYS AFTER INSTALLING SOD INCLUDING MOWING WHEN SOD RECITES 4' IN HEIGHT. WEED PLANTING BEDS AND MULCH SAUCERS AT MINIMUM ONCE A MONTH DURING THE GROWING SEASON. PROVIDE A MONTHLY REPORT TO THE OWNER ON WEEDING AND OTHER MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES. PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NUMBER L101 2X ROOT BALL WIDTH REVISIONS EXTEND HOLE EXCAVATION WIDTH A MINIMUM OF 6' BEYOND THE PLANTS ROOT SYSTEM. FINISHED GRADE EDGER, AS SPECIFIED PREPARED PLANTING BED AND BACKFILL SOIL (THOROUGHLY LOOSENED) DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH SOD 4" TOPSOIL PLANTING SOIL --- - ................... WERan= =WATAilAr n=11=11= i11= 11= = 1=11 -11=11- =ri=" =11=11=11=11=n=I TREE PLANTING DETAIL SCALE N.T.S. TURF/SOD 12' STEEL EDGER SPIKE 3/16" X 4" STEEL EDGER MULCH SECTION PLAN STEEL EDGER DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. L101 3/16' X 4" STEEL EDGER TURF/SOD 12' STEEL EDGER SPIKE TOP OF EDGER TO BE FLUSH WITH SOD MULCH SUBGRADE SPADED EDGE "V" SHAPED, 4" WIDTH, 4' DEPTH, MORE VERTICAL ON LAWN SIDE FINISHED GRADE SPADED EDGE DETAIL SCALE: 1-1/2,1' K: \TWC_LDEV1UPE DEVELOPMENTEdina Multifamily \3 Design \ CAD \ PlanSheets \L1-LANDSCAPE DETAILS.dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:08am 1 216977v1 (reserved for recording information) SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT CITY OF EDINA 4040 WEST 70TH STREET THIS SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) dated October 19, 2021, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”) and CORNELIA VIEW APARTMENTS, LLC a Minnesota limited liability company ( the “Developer”). 1. BACKGROUND. A. Developer has applied to redevelop Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 1365, Hennepin County Minnesota (torrens COT 1511530), in the City of Edina, State of Minnesota (“Subject Property”), into a three to four story, 118-unit senior affordable housing project with 86 underground parking spaces and 22 surface parking stalls (the “Project”). B. The City has rezoned the Subject Property to Planned Unit Development (“PUD”). The Project is in accordance with the PUD. A Site Improvement Performance Agreement is required for the PUD. 2 216977v1 2. RIGHT TO PROCEED. On the Subject Property, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: (1) this Agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with both the City Clerk and the Hennepin County Registrar’s Office, (2) the required security has been received by the City, and (3) the required insurance certificate has been received by the City. 3. PLANS. The Subject Property shall be developed in accordance with the following Plans which are on file with the City. The Plans shall not be attached to this Agreement. If the Plans vary from the written terms of this Agreement, the written terms shall control. The Plans are: Erosion Control Plan date stamped August 20, 2021 prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates Final Development Plan date stamped August 20, 2021 prepared by Pope Architects and/or Kimley-Horn and Associates Utility Plans date stamped August 20, 2021 prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates Details Plan date stamped August 20, 2021 prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates Design and Building Plan date stamped August 20, 2021 prepared by Pope Architects and/or Kimley-Horn and Associates Final Landscaping Plan date stamped August 20, 2021 prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates Parking Plan date stamped August 20, 2021 prepared by Pope Architects, Inc. or its subcontractors Traffic Impact Study and adopted traffic requirements in final plan approval dated May 6, 2021 prepared by Wenck Associates The Developer may for construction convenience and efficiency change the final composition of exterior materials that are not unit masonry, by up to five percent (5%) between metal and steel panel and may alter total fenestration by up to three percent (3%). The Developer may request other changes to the Plans. For Plan changes deemed minor, pursuant to City ordinances, changes can be reviewed and approved by City staff. All other Plan changes shall require approval by the City Council. 3 216977v1 4. EROSION CONTROL. Prior to initiating construction, the Erosion Control Plan shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control obligations if they would be reasonable and beneficial. All areas disturbed by the grading operations shall be stabilized per the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (“MPCA”) Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity. Seed shall be in accordance with the City's current seeding specification, which may include temporary seed to provide ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the MPCA Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity or with the Erosion Control Plan or any schedule of supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within thirty (30) days of receipt of notice thereof, the City may draw on the letter of credit to pay any costs. No development or utility construction will be allowed on the Subject Property and no building permits will be issued for the Subject Property unless the Subject Property is in full compliance with the approved Erosion Control Plan. The City understands and agrees that certain measures (such as seeding) cannot be implemented during winter conditions. Developer will implement Best Management Practices during winter conditions. 5. LICENSE. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Subject Property to perform (a) all work permitted to be 4 216977v1 performed by the City under this Agreement, and (b) all inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site development. 6. CONSTRUCTION ACCESS. Construction traffic access and egress must be in accordance with the Construction Management Plan, which will be provided by the Developer’s General Contractor and approved by the City prior to the commencement of construction. 7. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY/HOURS. Grading, construction activity, and the use of power equipment are prohibited between the hours of 7 o’clock p.m. and 7 o’clock a.m. The City may, at the City’s discretion and at the Developer’s expense, have one or more City inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a part-time basis. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all instructions received from the City’s inspectors. The Developer’s engineer or architect is responsible for design changes and contract administration between the Developer and the Developer’s contractor. The Developer or its engineer or architect shall schedule a pre-construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. 8. DEWATERING. Due to the variable nature of groundwater levels and stormwater flows, it is the Developer’s responsibility to satisfy itself with regard to the elevation of groundwater and to perform any necessary dewatering and storm flow routing. All dewatering shall be in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. 9. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. Improvements specifically designated as “Public Improvements” shall be those exclusively listed on Exhibit C, and which are exclusively for the benefit of the City or the Public. All other improvements by the Developer shall be “Private Improvements.” 5 216977v1 10. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install the Public Improvements identified on Exhibit C of this Agreement within eighteen (18) months after issuance of the necessary permits for the Public Improvements, excluding unavoidable delay for acts of god, weather, Covid, labor, supply chain or material shortage. 11. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Agreement and final acceptance by the City Engineer, the Public Improvements shall become City property without further notice or action. Prior to acceptance of the Public Improvements by the City, the Developer must furnish the following affidavits: Contractor’s Certificate Engineer’s or Architect’s Certificate Developer’s Certificate certifying that all construction has been completed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Upon receipt of affidavits and verification by the City Engineer, the City Engineer will accept the completed Public Improvements. Within thirty (30) days after the acceptance of the Public Improvements and before the security is released, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible record drawings. The City’s standard specifications for utility construction identify the procedures for final acceptance of utilities. 12. CLEAN UP. Within 24 hours the Developer shall clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, subcontractors, their agents or assigns. Prior to any construction in the Subject Property, the Developer shall identify in writing a responsible party for erosion control, street cleaning, and street sweeping. 13. CITY ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION. The Developer shall pay for in-house engineering administration. City in- house engineering administration will include monitoring of construction observation, 6 216977v1 consultation with Developer and its engineer on status or problems regarding the Project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, Project monitoring during the warranty period, final inspection and acceptance, and processing of requests for reduction in security. City will provide accurate accounting for engineering staff time spent on the Project. 14. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement, payment of the costs of all Public Improvements, and construction of all Public Improvements in accordance with the Plans, the Developer shall either deposit cash with the City or furnish the City with a letter of credit in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A (or some combination of cash and a letter of credit), from a bank in the total amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) ("Security"). The bank issuing the letter of credit shall be a financial institution selected by the Developer and subject to the approval of the City Manager, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. The City may draw down the Security, on five (5) business days written notice to the Developer, for any violation of the terms of this Agreement or without notice if the security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the Security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City that the Project has been substantially completed in accordance with the Plans and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with City approval the Security may be reduced from time to time by ninety percent (90%) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10%) of the Security shall be retained as security until all Public Improvements have been completed, all financial obligations to the City satisfied, the required "as constructed" plans have been received by the City, a warranty is provided, and the Public Improvements are accepted by the City Council. The City’s standard specifications for utility and street construction outline procedures for security reductions. 7 216977v1 15. WARRANTY. The Developer shall cause its contractor to warrant all Public Improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this Agreement against poor material and faulty workmanship. The warranty period for all Public Improvements is one year and shall commence following completion and acceptance by City Engineer. The Developer shall post or cause its contractor to post maintenance bonds or cash escrow in the amount of twenty-five percent (25%) of final certified construction costs of the Public Improvements to secure the warranties. The City shall retain ten percent (10%) of the security posted by the Developer until the maintenance bonds are furnished to the City or until the warranty period expires, whichever first occurs. The retainage may be used to pay for warranty work. 16. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. A. The Developer shall comply with the conditions outlined in City Council Resolution No. 2021-44. B. The Developer shall comply with the conditions outlined in the Director of Engineering’s memo dated May 6, 2019 and the Transportation Engineer’s memo dated May 6, 2019. C. The Developer shall comply with the conditions outlined and in the Fire Marshal and Building Official’s memo dated May 5, 2019, including all buildings to be equipped with sprinkler systems. D. To the extent economically and reasonably possible, the Project’s design and construction shall be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the Applicants’ Sustainability Questionnaire. Photovoltaic solar shall be an option at the sole discretion of the Developer based on availability of investment tax credits or other financing for same, and any 8 216977v1 energy improvements are subject to receipt of the corresponding Conservation Improvement Program rebate grants reflected in the Developer’s proforma. E. The Final Landscape Plan and the Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance and receive City’s review and approval of each Plan. F. Developer shall obtain and submit to the City for approval a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit prior to issuance of a building permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District’s requirements. G. The Developer shall comply with the Wenck Traffic Study recommendations H. The Developer shall provide a performance bond, letter of credit or cash deposit to the City for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of the first building permit. 17. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. The Developer shall pay all reasonable costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the installation of the Public Improvements, including but not limited to the development of the site, legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and development of the Subject Property, the preparation of this Agreement, review of any other plans and documents. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from Developer’s development of the site and installation of Public Improvements, except for costs incurred as a result of the City’s negligence or intentional misconduct. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses 9 216977v1 which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including reasonable attorneys' fees, except for costs, damagers or expenses incurred as a result of the City’s negligence or intentional misconduct, occurring during Developer’s development of the Subject Property. C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for undisputed obligations incurred under this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the undisputed bills are not paid on time, the City may halt site development and construction until the bills are paid in full. Undisputed bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per year. 18. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City or the Developer under this Agreement. B. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including property conveyed to third parties. C. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Agreement. D. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. E. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer has obtained consents to this Agreement, in the form attached hereto, from all parties 10 216977v1 who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. F. The Developer shall cause its general contractor to acquire public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of the general contractor's work or the work of their subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Said public liability coverage from the general contractor shall be the primary coverage required under this agreement, and the priority of coverage shall be deemed the responsibility of the general contractor for the work. Limits for such insurance shall be in a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy on a primary and noncontributory basis, and the general contractor shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage. The Developer shall name the City as an additional insured on the Developer’s builder’s risk insurance policy and associated liability policy for property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of the Developer’s work, not otherwise covered by the general contractor’s coverage, including personnel directly or indirectly employed by them. Said developer’s builder’s risk policy and any coverage provided thereto shall be subordinate to and secondary to any coverage provide by the general contractor, to the City. Limits for such insurance shall be in a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy on a primary and noncontributory basis, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage. 11 216977v1 The Developer and contractors must provide a Certificate of Insurance which meets the following requirements: 1. The Description section of the Accord form needs to read “City of Edina is named as Additional Insured with respect to the General Liability and Auto Liability policies on a Primary and Non-Contributory Basis.” 2. Certificate Holder must be City of Edina. 3. Provide a copy of the insurance certificate showing City of Edina named as Additional Insured on a Primary and Non-Contributory Basis. These insurance coverages and the requirements hereunder shall be required until the Certificate of Completion is issued. G. The Developer shall cause its general contractor and or their subcontractors to obtain Workmen’s Compensation Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota, including Employer’s Liability Insurance, to the limit of $100,000 each accident. These insurance coverages and the requirements hereunder shall be required until the Certificate of Completion is issued. H. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. I. The Developer represents to the City that the Public Improvements comply with all city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the Public Improvements do not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow 12 216977v1 construction or development work on the Subject Property until the Developer does comply. Upon the City’s demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. J. The Developer may not assign this Agreement to unrelated parties without the written permission of the City Council prior to issuance of the Certificate of Completion. Related parties for which assignment shall not require City consent shall include: the Borrower entity, the Lender, any General Partner and or Limited Partner of the Borrower entity, or constitute administrative members of such entity. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire Subject Property, or any part of it. K. An uncured breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer and the failure to cure such breach within the period provided in this Agreement, including nonpayment of billings from the City, shall be grounds for denial of building permits and certificates of occupancy, and the halting of all work on the property. L. Upon completion of construction and issuance of certificate of occupancy, the City shall execute and deliver a recordable certificate confirming the satisfaction or completion of certain requirements contained in this Agreement. 19. DEVELOPER’S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer, beyond the applicable notice and cure periods provided in this Agreement, as to any of the Public Improvement work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any actual, out-of-pocket expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given written notice of the work in default and the opportunity to cure, not less than thirty (30) days in advance. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary 13 216977v1 for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 20. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: Cornelia View Developers, LLC c/o Ecumen Shelley Kendrick, President 3530 Lexington Avenue North Shoreview, MN 55426-8186 With copy to: Lupe Development Partners, LLC Attn: Steven Minn, Manager 1701 Madison Street NE, #111 Minneapolis, MN 55413-1480 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: City of Edina Attn: City Manager Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424-1330 21. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION. After the Developer has received the final certificate of occupancy for the Improvements and completed the work required under this Agreement, the City Manager will issue a certificate of completion after written request from the Developer, unless denied as set forth below. The certificate of completion shall be consistent in form with the certificate of completion issued by the City and shall be in recordable form and may be recorded against the Subject Property. 14 216977v1 [Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signature pages follow.] 15 216977v1 CITY OF EDINA By: ____________________________________ James Hovland, Mayor And ___________________________________ Scott Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of _______________, 2021, by James Hovland and Scott Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager, of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ___________________________________ Notary Public 16 216977v1 DEVELOPER: CORNELIA VIEW DEVELOPERS, LLC By: ____________________________________ Shelley Kendrick, Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of _______________, 2021, by Shelley Kendrick, the Chief Manager of Cornelia View Developers, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the entity. ___________________________________ Notary Public 17 216977v1 DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: 651-452-5000 DSK 216977v1 EXHIBIT A IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. ___________________ Date: _________________ TO: City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424-1330 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $____________, available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. __________, dated ________________, 2_____, of (Name of Bank) "; b) Be signed by the City Manager or Finance Director of the City of Edina. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) , on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2_____. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty- five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Edina Finance Director that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Edina City Manager, Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424-1330, and is actually received by the City Manager at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. BY: ____________________________________ Its ______________________________ 216977v1 EXHIBIT B FORM OF PAYMENT AND PERFORMANCE BOND FOR PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS 216977v1 EXHIBIT C PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS OF PROJECT PROVIDED BY DEVELOPER 1. Required public sidewalks in the Right-of- Way 2. Required Landscaping in the Right of Way 216977v1 FEE OWNER CONSENT TO SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT EAST EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, fee owner of the Subject Property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Improvement Performance Agreement, affirms and consents to the provisions thereof and agrees to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply the Subject Property. Dated this _____ day of _________________, 2021. EAST EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION By: ____________________________________ Jeff Huggett, President STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of _______________, 2021, by Jeff Huggett, the President of East Edina Housing Foundation, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, on behalf of the entity. ________________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 DSK 216977v1 MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota, which holds a mortgage on the Subject Property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Improvement Performance Agreement, which mortgage is dated June 1, 2020 and recorded June 5, 2020 with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles as document number T05714416, agrees that the Site Improvement Performance Agreement shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2021. HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: ______________________________________ ____________________________[print name] Its ____________________________ [title] STATE OF ______________ ) )ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of __________, 2021, by ______________________________, the ______________________________ of Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a __________________ ___________________________, on behalf of the entity. ________________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 DSK Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.R. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-98: Accepting Donations Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2021-98 accepting donations. INTRODUCTION: To comply with State Statute, all donations to the City must be accepted by resolution and approved by two- thirds majority of the Council. See attached resolution with list of donations. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-98: Accepting Donations RESOLUTION NO. 2021-98 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Parks & Recreation Cates Fine Homes $ 350 Tree Fox Meadow Park Doris Grimes $3,200 Bench at Arden Park Dated: October 19, 2021 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 19, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _______ day of ___________________, 2021. City Clerk Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: VII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Jennifer Garske, Executive Assistant Item Activity: Subject:Proclamation: Extra Mile Day 2021 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the proclamation declaring November 1, 2021, Extra Mile Day. INTRODUCTION: Each year, the Extra Mile America Foundation asked cities to highlight this day to remind individuals and organizations that one person can make a difference in creating positive changes in America. Edina began participating in Extra Mile Day in 2015. ATTACHMENTS: Description Proclamation: Extra Mile Day 2021 PROCLAMATION EXTRA MILE DAY NOVEMBER 1, 2021 WHEREAS, Edina, Minnesota, is a community which acknowledges that a special vibrancy exists within the entire community when its individual citizens collectively “go the extra mile” in personal effort, volunteerism, and service; and WHEREAS, Edina, Minnesota, is a community which encourages its citizens to maximize their personal contribution to the community by giving of themselves wholeheartedly and with total effort, commitment and conviction to their individual ambitions, family, friends and community; and WHEREAS, Edina, Minnesota, is a community which chooses to shine a light on and celebrate individuals and organizations within its community who “go the extra mile” in order to make a difference and lift up fellow members of their community; and WHEREAS, Edina, Minnesota, acknowledges the mission of Extra Mile America to create 550 Extra Mile cities in America and is proud to support “Extra Mile Day” on November 1, 2021. NOW, THEREFORE, I, James B. Hovland, Mayor of Edina, do hereby proclaim November 1, 2021, to be EXTRA MILE DAY I urge each individual in the community to take time on this day to not only “go the extra mile” in his or her own life, but to also acknowledge all those who are inspirational in their efforts and commitment to make their organizations, families, community, country or world a better place. Dated this 19th day of October, 2021. ________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: VIII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution 2021-99 Establishing Eden Willson Tax Increment Financing District Action, Discussion CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Close the public hearing at noon, October 25, and continue action to the item to the November 3, City Council Meeting. INTRODUCTION: This item pertains to the potential creation of a new Tax Increment Financing District in order to provide funding for a combination of private redevelopment and public improvements. The Public Hearing will be conducted on October 19th. Additional public comment will be accepted through October 25th. Action on this Resolution is recommended to be deferred until November 3, 2021. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Establish Eden Willson TIF District Resolution No. 2021-99: Establishing Eden Willson TIF District TIF Plan Staff Presentation October 19, 2021 Mayor and City Council Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Resolution 2021-99: Establish Eden Willson Tax Increment Financing District Information / Background: The City and Housing and Redevelopment Authority are considering entering into a Redevelopment Agreement with Reuter Walton to provide financial assistance using Tax Increment Financing (TIF). A new TIF District is proposed to be established to enable public financing for private and public improvements. The redevelopment project is located at 4917 Eden Avenue. The existing commercial structure is anticipated to be vacated and demolished. A new 7-story apartment building will be constructed on the site with below ground and surface parking. The building will include commercial tenant space on the first floor. Ten percent of the apartment units will be affordably-priced. In July 2021, the developer was granted preliminary rezoning and site plan approval for the mixed-use development. Staff has met with the developer to understand the financial conditions that warrant consideration of public financing. Staff has also engaged legal and financial advisors at Ehlers Associates and Dorsey & Whitney to scrutinize the financial pro forma and provide input on the potential use of TIF for this project. Ehlers has scrutinized the financial pro forma and determined that the financial gap in the $83.7 million is approximately $5.1 million. Ehlers also confirmed that “but for” the use of TIF, this project will be unable to secure private financing. In August 2021, the HRA agreed with the general business terms identified for the use of TIF. Tax Increment Financing (TIF) is one of the financial tools available to the City to encourage new investment in a manner that enhances the property tax base and achieves other community goals. TIF uses new property taxes (aka incremental taxes) that are generated by a new project to pay for some of the costs associated with the new project. The existing tax base continues to be distributed to the school, city, county and other taxing agencies. STAFF REPORT – Public Hearing for Resolution 2021-99 Page 2 The use of TIF is governed by Minnesota Statutes that have evolved over several decades. These laws provide a number of protections to ensure that financial incentives are not over-used or mis-used. The City of Edina has historically used TIF to a lesser extent than its peers. The City’s TIF Policy limits financial risk to the City and strives to maximize public benefits when TIF is used. In this case, staff recommends that a new TIF District be created so that the financial gap of the proposed 4917 Eden Apartment project can be bridged and also so that funding is available for several public improvements to the roadway network that serves the site and the general area. This recommendation is based on the following: District is located within the boundaries of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Creation of a new 25-year Redevelopment TIF District Boundaries include parcels at 4917 and 4918 Eden Avenue containing three existing sub-standard buildings as well as adjacent road right of way that connects the site with the transportation network Redevelopment can deliver 20 units of new affordable priced housing, public parking and dedicated public land for future public improvement adjacent to Highway 100 Redevelopment can provide funding source for related public improvements to the roadway network on Eden, Willson, Grange & 50th Street that serves the site and surrounding neighborhoods The site has been investigated by Stantec to ensure it qualifies per the Minnesota TIF regulations. Ehlers Associates, the City’s public finance advisor has prepared a Tax Increment Financing Plan to establish the parameters of the new TIF District. This Plan has been reviewed by the City’s special counsel for redevelopment matters – Dorsey & Whitney to ensure compliance with State Law. Draft copies of this Plan have been distributed to affected taxing agencies, including the Edina School District and Hennepin County in accordance with the process identified in State Law. As of the writing of this staff report, no concerns have been expressed regarding the creation of the Eden Willson TIF District. The TIF Plan has also been presented and discussed with the Edina Heritage Preservation Commission, Edina Park and Recreation Commission, Edina Historical Society and the Edina Planning Commission. This TIF Plan was approved by the Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority on October 14th. Please note that the proposed Resolution and Public Hearing only relate to the establishment of a new TIF District. The TIF Redevelopment Agreement with the developer will be considered in a separate action scheduled for the October 28th HRA Board and November 3rd City Council meetings. The public hearing will remain open for public comment until Monday October 25th. Final action on the TIF District and the TIF Redevelopment Agreement with Reuter Walton is anticipated to occur on November 3, 2021. This is the same date that the final zoning approvals will be considered. Staff recommends that Resolution 2021-99 be approved. CITY OF EDINA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA Councilmember ______________________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 2021-99 ESTABLISHING THE EDEN WILLSON REDEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The Board of Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA") have heretofore established the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area (the "Project Area") and adopted a Redevelopment Plan therefore. It has been proposed by the HRA and the City that the City approve and the HRA adopt a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area (the "Redevelopment Plan Modification") and a Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF Plan") for the establishment of the Eden Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District (the "TIF District") therein (the Redevelopment Plan Modification and the TIF Plan are referred to collectively herein as the "Plans"); all pursuant to and in conformity with applicable law, including Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 and Sections 469.174 to 469.1794, all inclusive, as amended, (the "Act") all as reflected in the Plans, and presented for the Council's consideration. 1.02. The HRA and City have investigated the facts relating to the Plans and have caused the Plans to be prepared. 1.03. The HRA and City will have performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the establishment of the TIF District and the adoption and approval of the proposed Plans, including, but not limited to, notification of Hennepin County and Independent School District No. 273 having taxing jurisdiction over the property within the TIF District, a review of and written comment on the Plans by the City Planning Commission, approval of the Plans by the HRA on October 14, 2021, and the holding of a public hearing upon published notice as required by law. 1.04. Certain written reports (the ''Reports") relating to the Plans and to the activities contemplated therein have heretofore been prepared by staff and consultants and submitted to the Council and/or made a part of the City files and proceedings on the Plans. The Reports include data, information and/or substantiation constituting or relating to the basis for the other findings and determinations made in this resolution. The Council hereby confirms, ratifies and adopts the Reports, which are hereby incorporated into and made as fully a part of this resolution to the same extent as if set forth in full herein. 1.05. The City is not modifying the boundaries of the Project Area, but is, however, modifying the Redevelopment Plan to include activities related to the TIF District. Resolution 2021-99 Page 2 Section 2. Findings for the Adoption and Approval of the Redevelopment Plan Modification. 2.01. The Council approves the Redevelopment Plan Modification, and specifically finds that: (a) the land within the Project Area would not be available for redevelopment without the financial aid to be sought under this Redevelopment Plan; (b) the Redevelopment Plan, as modified, will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Project Area by private enterprise; and (c) that the Redevelopment Plan, as modified, conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. Section 3. Findings for the Establishment of the TIF District. 3.01. The Council hereby finds that the TIF District is in the public interest and is a "redevelopment district" under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. 10 of the Act. 3.02. The Council further finds that the proposed redevelopment would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the TIF District permitted by the TIF Plan. 3.03. The Council finds that the TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the City as a whole; and that the TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the redevelopment or development of the TIF District by private enterprise. 3.04. The Council further finds, declares and determines that the City made the above findings stated in this Section and has set forth the reasons and supporting facts for each determination in writing, attached hereto as Exhibit A. 3.05. The HRA elects to calculate fiscal disparities for the TIF District in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subd. 3, clause b, which means the fiscal disparities contribution would be taken from inside the TIF District. Section 4. Public Purpose. 4.01. The adoption of the Plans conforms in all respects to the requirements of the Act and will help fulfill a need to develop an area of the City which is already built up, to provide housing and employment opportunities, to improve the tax base and to improve the general economy of the State and thereby serves a public purpose. For the reasons described in Exhibit A, the City believes these benefits directly derive from the tax increment assistance provided under the TIF Plan. A private developer will receive only the assistance needed to make the development financially feasible. As such, any private benefits received by a property owner are incidental and do not outweigh the primary public benefits. Section 5. Approval and Adoption of the Plans. 5.01. The Plans, as presented to the Council on this date, including without limitation the findings and statements of objectives contained therein, are hereby approved, ratified, established, and adopted and shall be placed on file in the office of the HRA Executive Director. Resolution 2021-99 Page 3 5.02. The staff of the City, the City's advisors and legal counsel are authorized and directed to proceed with the implementation of the Plans and to negotiate, draft, prepare and present to this Council for its consideration all further plans, resolutions, documents and contracts necessary for this purpose. 5.03 The Auditor of Hennepin County is requested to certify the original net tax capacity of the TIF District, as described in the Plans, and to certify in each year thereafter the amount by which the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased; and the HRA is authorized and directed to forthwith transmit this request to the County Auditor in such form and content as the Auditor may specify, together with a list of all properties within the TIF District, for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding the adoption of this resolution. 5.04. The HRA Executive Director is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the Plans with the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Revenue and the Office of the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.175, Subd. 4a. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council member ______________________, and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: _________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ and the following voted against the same: _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ Dated: November 3, 2021 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of November 3, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of________________________, 2021. _______________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Resolution 2021-99 Page 4 Resolution 2021-99 Page 5 EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2021-99 The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Eden Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District, as required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 are as follows: 1. Finding that the Eden Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District is a redevelopment district as defined in M.S., Section 469.174, Subdivision 10. The District consists of two (2) parcels within the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and their internal and external rights-of-way, abutting roadways and intersections, pedestrian pathways and crossings, all with plans to redevelop the area for redevelopment and construction of a mixed-use apartment and retail building. Parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area of the District are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures and more than 50 percent of the buildings in the District, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance. (See Appendix D of the TIF Plan.) 2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the TIF Plan. The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future: This finding is supported by the fact that the activities proposed in the TIF Plan meets the City's objectives for redevelopment. The existing property contains substandard buildings whose renovation requires high costs related to demolition, remediation and reconstruction of infrastructure. The redevelopment also requires substantial investment toward public improvements such as local transportation and utility infrastructure and shared public parking. The combination of limited amounts of property available for expansion adjacent to the existing redevelopment site, height/density limitations, and the public and private cost of financing the proposed improvements which are essential to the comprehensive redevelopment of the area, this project is feasible only through assistance, in part, from tax increment financing. The developer provided a proforma outlining project sources and uses as well as projected rent, vacancy and financing assumptions. City staff and the City’s financial advisor reviewed the information and have determined that the project is not feasible without assistance due to anticipated rent levels and market returns not supporting the redevelopment costs for this site. The term of assistance for the redevelopment project is expected to be less than the maximum 26-year term of a redevelopment district. The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the TIF Plan: This finding is justified on the grounds that the development intensity and tax base created on currently underutilized and declining property requires site and public improvement costs that are improbable without public assistance. Specifically, the cost of site preparation, Resolution 2021-99 Page 6 demolition, remediation, and public improvements to include transportation and utility infrastructure will add significantly to the total redevelopment cost of any development in this area. Site and public improvements costs necessary to sustain the approved density have made redevelopment infeasible without tax increment assistance. The City reasonably determines that no other redevelopment of similar scope is anticipated on this site without substantially similar assistance being provided to the development. Therefore, the City concludes as follows: a. The City's estimate of the amount by which the market value of the entire District will increase without the use of tax increment financing is $0. b. If the proposed development occurs, the total estimated increase in taxable market value will be $51,721,500. c. The present value of tax increments from the District for the maximum duration of the district permitted by the TIF Plan is estimated to be $12,043,964. d. Even if some development other than the proposed development were to occur, the Council finds that no alternative would occur that would produce a taxable market value increase greater than $39,677,536 (the amount in clause b less the amount in clause c) without tax increment assistance. 3. Finding that the TIF Plan for the Eden Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole. The Planning Commission reviewed the TIF Plan on October 13, 2021 and approved Resolution PC-B-21-31 to provide written opinion affirming that the TIF Plan conforms to the general development plan of the City. 4. Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Eden Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area by private enterprise. Through the implementation of the TIF Plan, the City will provide an impetus for the construction of a new mixed-use private development which will result in increased employment in the City and the State of Minnesota, the renovation of substandard properties, increased tax base of the State and add a high-quality development to the City. Resolution 2021-99 Page 7 Public Hearing Date: October 19, 2021 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota Modification to the Redevelopment Plan Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area & Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Plan Establishment of Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District (a redevelopment district) BUILDING COMMUNITIES. IT’S WHAT WE DO. Prepared by: Ehlers 3060 Centre Pointe Drive Roseville, Minnesota 55113 TABLE OF CONTENTS Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area 1 FOREWORD 1 MUNICIPAL ACTION TAKEN 1 Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 4 FOREWORD 4 STATUTORY AUTHORITY 4 STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES 4 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OVERVIEW 5 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY IN THE DISTRICT AND PROPERTY TO BE ACQUIRED 5 DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION 6 DURATION & FIRST YEAR OF DISTRICT’S TAX INCREMENT 6 ORIGINAL TAX CAPACITY, TAX RATE & ESTIMATED CAPTURED NET TAX CAPACITY VALUE/INCREMENT & NOTIFICATION OF PRIOR PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS 7 SOURCES OF REVENUE/BONDS TO BE ISSUED 8 USES OF FUNDS 9 FISCAL DISPARITIES ELECTION 10 ESTIMATED IMPACT ON OTHER TAXING JURISDICTIONS 10 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION 13 DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION 14 Appendix A: Map of Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and the TIF District A Appendix B: Estimated Cash Flow for the District B Appendix C: Findings Including But/For Qualifications C Appendix D: Redevelopment Qualifications for the District D Appendix E: Project Description E Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 1 Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area FOREWORD The following text represents a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. This modification represents a continuation of the goals and objectives set forth in the Redevelopment Plan for Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area originally adopted September 29, 1977, and modified from time to time. Generally, the substantive changes include the establishment of the Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District. MUNICIPAL ACTION TAKEN Based upon the statutory authority described in the Redevelopment Plan, the public purpose findings by the City Council and for the purpose of fulfilling the City’s development objects as set forth in the Redevelopment Plan, the City Council has created, established and designated the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan pursuant to and in accordance with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.001 to 469.047. The original and amended Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan documents designated the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan as a redevelopment project and also a tax increment financing plan for tax increment districts created prior to 1988. The Centennial Lakes Tax Increment Financing District was created in 1988 pursuant to Tax Increment Financing Plan 88-1, which was subsequently renamed the Centennial Lakes Tax Increment District and referred to by Hennepin County as District #1203 and #1249. For purposes of clarification, this modification will refer to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.002. The following municipal action has been taken with regard to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan: September 29, 1977: The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina (the “HRA”) approved the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan. October 5, 1981: The Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan was amended to identify project costs and bonded indebtedness incurred to finance those costs. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 2 May 6, 1985: The HRA and the City approved an amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan which establishes an interest reduction program and enlarges the project area to include the “1985 Project Area.” August 19, 1985: The HRA and the City approved the First Amendment to the 1985 Amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan to enlarge the 1985 Project Area and authorize the issuance of additional bonds to acquire land within the enlarged 1985 Project Area. 1987: The HRA and City approved the 1987 Amendments to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan to enlarge the project area to include the 1987 Project Area. 1988: The HRA and City approved the 1988 Amendments to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan to provide an Interest Reduction Program in the amount of $2,500,000 to assist in the financing and construction of housing units and authorize the HRA and City to incur additional bonded indebtedness. February 21, 2012: The HRA and City expand the Southeast Edina Project Area. April 17, 2012: The HRA and City establish the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District. February 18, 2014: The HRA and City establish the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District. March 2, 2016: The HRA and City establish the Grandview 2 Tax Increment Financing District. April 5, 2016: The HRA and City modify the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District and establish the 66 West Tax Increment Financing District. June 20, 2017: The HRA and City establish the 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District. October 16, 2018: The HRA and City establish the 44th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District. November 20, 2018: The HRA and City modify the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District to increase the TIF Budget and enable special legislative pooling authority for affordable housing. November 20, 2018: The HRA and City also establish the West 76th Street Tax Increment Financing District. March 19, 2019: The HRA and City establish the 72nd and France Tax Increment Financing District. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 3 December 17, 2019: The HRA and City modify the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District to designate property to be acquired and establish the Amundson Avenue Tax Increment Financing District. August 4, 2021: The HRA and City establish the 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District. September 9, 2021: The HRA and City modify the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District to increase the estimated project costs expected to be paid or financed with tax increment from the Southdale 2 TIF District, to include affordable housing project costs. (As Modified October 19, 2021) October 19, 2021: The HRA and City establish the Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District. For further information, a review of the Redevelopment Plan for Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, is recommended. It is available from the HRA Executive Director at the City of Edina. Other relevant information is contained in the Tax Increment Financing Plans for the Tax Increment Financing Districts located within the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 4 Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District FOREWORD The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA"), the City of Edina (the "City"), staff and consultants have prepared the following information to expedite the establishment of the Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District (the "District"), a redevelopment tax increment financing district, located in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. STATUTORY AUTHORITY Within the City, there exist areas where public involvement is necessary to cause development or redevelopment to occur. To this end, the HRA and City have certain statutory powers pursuant to Minnesota Statutes ("M.S."), Sections 469.001 - 469.047, inclusive, as amended (the “HRA Act”), and M.S., Sections 469.174 to 469.1794, inclusive, as amended (the "Tax Increment Financing Act" or "TIF Act"), to assist in financing public costs related to this project. This section contains the Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF Plan") for the District. Other relevant information is contained in the Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, originally adopted September 29, 1977, and modified from time to time. STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES The District currently consists of two (2) parcels of land inclusive of internal and external rights-of-way, abutting roadways and intersections, pedestrian pathways and crossings depicted within the map contained in Appendix A. The District is being created to facilitate redevelopment of the 4917 Eden Avenue site including construction of a new mixed use apartment and retail redevelopment and associated public improvements in the City. Please see Appendix E for further District information. The HRA anticipates entering into an agreement with Eden Avenue Group, LLC as the developer. Development is anticipated to begin in 2022. This TIF Plan is expected to achieve many of the objectives outlined in the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 5 The activities contemplated in the Modification to the Redevelopment Plan and the TIF Plan do not preclude the undertaking of other qualified development or redevelopment activities. These activities are anticipated to occur over the life of Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and the District. REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OVERVIEW Pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan and authorizing state statutes, the HRA or City is authorized to undertake the following activities in the District: 1. Property to be Acquired – The HRA or City currently owns one parcel of property within the District. The remaining property located within the District may be acquired by the HRA or City and is further described in this TIF Plan. 2. Relocation - Relocation services, to the extent required by law, are available pursuant to M.S., Chapter 117 and other relevant state and federal laws. 3. Upon approval of a developer's plan relating to the project and completion of the necessary legal requirements, the HRA or City may sell to a developer selected properties that it may acquire within the District or may lease land or facilities to a developer. 4. The HRA or City may perform or provide for some or all necessary acquisition, construction, relocation, demolition, and required utilities and public street work within the District. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY IN THE DISTRICT AND PROPERTY TO BE ACQUIRED The District encompasses property identified by the parcels listed below, inclusive of adjacent rights-of-way, pedestrian pathways and crossing, and abutting roadways and intersections. Parcel number Address Owner 1802824320023 4917 Eden Avenue Eden Ventures 1802824320029 4918 and 4920 Eden Avenue* City of Edina * As depicted in Appendix A, the District will include only the portion of parcel #18-028-24-32-0029 west of Grange Road. Please also see the map in Appendix A for further information on the location of the District. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 6 The HRA or City may acquire any parcel within the District including interior and adjacent street rights-of-way. Any properties identified for acquisition will be acquired by the HRA or City only in order to accomplish one or more of the following: storm sewer improvements; provide land for needed public streets and sidewalks, utilities and facilities; carry out land acquisition, site improvements, clearance and/or development to accomplish the uses and objectives set forth in this plan. The HRA or City may acquire property by gift, dedication, condemnation or direct purchase from willing sellers in order to achieve the objectives of this TIF Plan. Such acquisitions will be undertaken only when there is assurance of funding to finance the acquisition and related costs. The HRA or City currently owns one parcel of the property to be included in the District. DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION The HRA and City, in determining the need to create a tax increment financing district in accordance with the TIF Act find that the District, to be established, is a redevelopment district pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 10(a)(1). $ The District consists of two (2) parcels. $ An inventory shows that parcels consisting of more than 70 percent of the area in the District are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures. $ An inspection of the buildings located within the District finds that more than 50 percent of the buildings are structurally substandard as defined in the TIF Act. (See Appendix D). Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 7, the District does not contain any parcel or part of a parcel that qualified under the provisions of M.S., Sections 273.111, 273.112, or 273.114 or Chapter 473H for taxes payable in any of the five calendar years before the filing of the request for certification of the District. DURATION & FIRST YEAR OF DISTRICT’S TAX INCREMENT Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 1, and Section 469.176, Subd. 1, the duration and first year of tax increment of the District must be indicated within the TIF Plan. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 1b., the duration of the District will be 25 years after receipt of the first increment by the HRA or City (a total of 26 years of tax increment). The HRA or City elects to receive the first tax increment in 2025, which is no later than four years following the year of approval of the District. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 7 Thus, it is estimated that the District, including any modifications of the TIF Plan for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate after 2050, or when the TIF Plan is satisfied. The HRA or City reserves the right to decertify the District prior to the legally required date. ORIGINAL TAX CAPACITY, TAX RATE & ESTIMATED CAPTURED NET TAX CAPACITY VALUE/INCREMENT & NOTIFICATION OF PRIOR PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 7 and M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, the Original Net Tax Capacity (ONTC) as certified for the District will be based on the market values placed on the property by the assessor in 2021 for taxes payable 2022. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subds. 1 and 2, the County Auditor shall certify in each year (beginning in the payment year 2025) the amount by which the original value has increased or decreased as a result of: 1. Change in tax exempt status of property; 2. Reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the district; 3. Change due to adjustments, negotiated or court-ordered abatements; 4. Change in the use of the property and classification; 5. Change in state law governing class rates; or 6. Change in previously issued building permits. In any year in which the current Net Tax Capacity (NTC) value of the District declines below the ONTC, no value will be captured and no tax increment will be payable to the HRA or City. The Original Local Tax Rate for the District will be the local tax rate for taxes payable 2022, assuming the request for certification is made before June 30, 2022). The estimated ONTC and the Original Local Tax Rate for the District appear in the table below. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174 Subd. 4 and M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, 2, and 4, the estimated Captured Net Tax Capacity (CTC) of the District, within Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, upon completion of the District, will annually approximate tax increment revenues as shown in the table below. The HRA and City request 100 percent of the available increase in tax capacity for repayment of its obligations and current expenditures, beginning in the tax year payable 2025. The Project Tax Capacity (PTC) listed is an estimate of values when the projects within the District are completed. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 8 Estimated Project Tax Capacity (PTC) 887,151 Less: Estimated Original Net Tax Capacity (ONTC 38,495 Less: Fiscal Disparities 8,351 Estimated Captured Tax Capacity (CTC)840,304 Estimated Original Local Tax Rate 107.8580%Pay 2021 Estimated Annual Tax Increment (CTC x Rate)$906,335 Percent Retained by the HRA 100% Project Tax Capacity Note: Estimated PTC includes a 1% inflation factor for the duration of the District and is the estimated tax capacity of the District in year 25. The tax capacity of the District in year one is estimated to be 691,772. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 4, the HRA shall, after a due and diligent search, accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor or its notice of the District enlargement pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 4, with a listing of all properties within the District or area of enlargement for which building permits have been issued during the eighteen (18) months immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan by the municipality pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 3. The County Auditor shall increase the original net tax capacity of the District by the net tax capacity of improvements for which a building permit was issued. The City is reviewing the area to be included in the District to determine if any building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan. SOURCES OF REVENUE/BONDS TO BE ISSUED The total estimated tax increment revenues for the District are shown in the table below: SOURCES Tax Increment 20,668,426$ Interest 2,066,843 TOTAL 22,735,269$ The costs outlined in the Uses of Funds will be financed primarily through the annual collection of tax increments. The HRA or City reserves the right to incur bonds or other indebtedness as a result of the TIF Plan. As presently proposed, the projects within the District will be financed by a pay-as-you-go note, interfund loans, and/or a possible bond issue. Any refunding amounts will be deemed a budgeted cost without a formal TIF Plan Modification. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 9 This provision does not obligate the HRA or City to incur debt. The HRA or City will issue bonds or incur other debt only upon the determination that such action is in the best interest of the City. The HRA or City may issue bonds (as defined in the TIF Act) secured in whole or in part with tax increments from the District in a maximum principal amount of $14,934,231. Such bonds may be in the form of pay-as-you-go notes, revenue bonds or notes, general obligation bonds, or interfund loans. This estimate of total bonded indebtedness is a cumulative statement of authority under this TIF Plan as of the date of approval. USES OF FUNDS Currently under consideration for the District is a proposal to facilitate redevelopment of the property into a mixed-use apartment and commercial retail building and necessitated public infrastructure improvements. The HRA and City have determined that it will be necessary to provide assistance to the project(s) for certain District costs, as described. The HRA has studied the feasibility of the development or redevelopment of property in and around the District. To facilitate the establishment and development or redevelopment of the District, this TIF Plan authorizes the use of tax increment financing to pay for the cost of certain eligible expenses. The estimate of public costs and uses of funds associated with the District is outlined in the following table. These estimates establish the maximum amount permitted to be expended, but the HRA and City is not obligated to expend the full amount. USES Land/Building Acquisition 3,000,000$ Site Improvements/Preparation 750,000 Affordable Housing 2,066,843 Utilities 1,500,000 Other Qualifying Improvements 5,550,545 Administrative Costs (up to 10%)2,066,843 PROJECT COSTS TOTAL 14,934,231$ Interest 7,801,038 PROJECT AND INTEREST COSTS TOTAL 22,735,269$ The total project cost, including financing costs (interest) listed in the table above does not exceed the total projected tax increments for the District as shown in the Sources of Revenue section. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 10 Estimated costs associated with the District are subject to change among categories without a modification to this TIF Plan. The cost of all activities to be considered for tax increment financing will not exceed, without formal modification, the budget above pursuant to the applicable statutory requirements. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 2, no more than 25 percent of the tax increment paid by property within the District will be spent on activities related to development or redevelopment outside of the District but within the boundaries of Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, (including administrative costs, which are considered to be spent outside of the District) subject to the limitations as described in this TIF Plan. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 2(d), the HRA and City may elect to increase by up to ten percentage points the permitted amount of expenditures for activities located outside the geographic area of the District. The HRA and City intend to pool tax increment paid by property within the District to be used to assist housing that meets the requirements contained in M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 2(d). FISCAL DISPARITIES ELECTION Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 3, the HRA or City may elect one of two methods to calculate fiscal disparities contribution of commercial- industrial net tax capacity from the District. The HRA will choose to calculate fiscal disparities by clause b (inside the District). ESTIMATED IMPACT ON OTHER TAXING JURISDICTIONS The estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions assumes that the redevelopment contemplated by the TIF Plan would occur without the creation of the District. However, the HRA and City have determined that such development or redevelopment would not reasonably be expected to occur "but for" tax increment financing and that, therefore, the fiscal impact on other taxing jurisdictions is $0. The estimated fiscal impact of the District would be as follows if the "but for" test was not met: Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 11 Entity 2020/Pay 2021 Total Net Tax Capacity Estimated Captured Tax Capacity (CTC) upon completion Percent of CTC to Entity Total Hennepin County 2,080,642,179 840,304 0.0404% City of Edina 141,273,381 840,304 0.5948% ISD 273 (Edina)115,791,268 840,304 0.7257% Impact on Tax Base If "But/For" Not Met Entity Pay 2021 Extension Rate Percent of Total Rate CTC Potential Annual Taxes Hennepin County 38.2100%35.43% 840,304 $ 321,080 City of Edina 28.9390%26.83% 840,304 243,176 ISD 273 (Edina)31.4740%29.18% 840,304 264,477 Other 9.2350%8.56% 840,304 77,602 107.8580%100.00% $ 906,335 Impact on Tax Rates If "But/For" Not Met The estimates listed above display the estimated CTC when all construction is completed at the end of the District. The tax rate used for calculations is the Pay 2021 rate as obtained from Hennepin County. The total net capacity for the entities listed above are based on Pay 2021 figures provided by Hennepin County. The District will be certified under the Pay 2022 rates, which were unavailable at the time this TIF Plan was prepared. Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175 Subd. 2(b): (1) Estimate of total tax increment. It is estimated that the total amount of tax increment from property within the District that will be generated over the life of the District is $20,668,426; Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 12 (2) Probable impact of the District on city provided services and ability to issue debt. An impact of the District on police protection is expected, as it is with any new development. With any addition of new residents or businesses, police calls for service will be increased. New developments add an increase in traffic and additional overall demands to the call load. However, the roadway improvements proposed as part of this redevelopment are expected to help emergency response. The City does not expect that the proposed redevelopment, in and of itself, will necessitate new capital investment in vehicles or facilities, nor an increase to staffing levels. The probable impact of the District on Fire/EMS services is not expected to be significant. A new, fully-sprinklered, non-age restricted apartment building is expected to generate few calls, if any, and be of superior construction and compliant with the latest building codes. Some of the existing buildings, which will be eliminated or relocated by the new development, are of older construction and carry issues that are expected to be improved by the new structures and/or relocation. The City does not expect that the proposed development, in and of itself, will necessitate additional staffing or new capital investment in vehicles or facilities. The impact of the District on public infrastructure is expected to be moderate. The redevelopment is not expected to significantly impact any traffic movements external to the area, but new infrastructure funded by the TIF District is proposed to enhance traffic movement throughout the District. The City may need to relocate fiber optic lines near the redevelopment and road improvements as part of the infrastructure costs. The current system infrastructure for sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water will be able to handle the additional volume generated from the proposed development. Based on the development plans, there are minimal additional costs associated with street maintenance, sweeping, plowing, lighting and sidewalks. The development in the District is expected to contribute an estimated $487,060 in met council sanitary sewer (SAC) and $878,080 in City sanitary sewer and water fees. The probable impact of any District general obligation debt issuance on the City’s ability to issue debt for general fund purposes is expected to be minimal. The City may issue general obligation tax increment revenue bonds to fund public infrastructure at some point during the District, but any such issuance is not expected to require the City’s general revenue support and would not apply to the City’s statutory debt limit. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 13 (3) Estimated amount of tax increment attributable to school district levies. It is estimated that the amount of tax increments over the life of the District that would be attributable to school district levies, assuming the school district's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same, is $6,031,245. The amount is calculated by multiplying the total estimated increment of $20,668,426 by the school district’s percent of the proportionate share of the total tax rate of 29.18%; (4) Estimated amount of tax increment attributable to county levies. It is estimated that the amount of tax increments over the life of the District that would be attributable to county levies, assuming the county's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same, is $7,322,040. The amount is calculated by multiplying the total estimated increment of $20,668,426 by the County’s percent of the proportionate share of the total tax rate of 35.43%; (5) Additional information requested by the county or school district. The City is not aware of any standard questions in a county or school district written policy regarding tax increment districts and impact on county or school district services. The county or school district must request additional information pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175 Subd. 2(b) within 15 days after receipt of the tax increment financing plan. At this time, no requests for additional information from the county or school district regarding the proposed development for the District have been received. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175, Subd. 1 (a), clause 7 the TIF Plan must contain identification and description of studies and analyses used to make the determination set forth in M.S. Section 469.175, Subd. 3, clause (b)(2) and the findings are required in the resolution approving the District. (i) In making said determination, reliance has been placed upon (1) written representation made by the developer to such effects, (2) review of the developer’s anticipated proforma; and (3) City staff awareness of the feasibility of developing the project site within the District, which is further outlined in the City Council resolution approving the establishment of the TIF District and Appendix C. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 14 (ii) A comparative analysis of estimated market value both with and without establishment of the TIF District and the use of tax increments has been performed. Such analysis is included with the cashflow in Appendix B and indicates that the increase in estimated market value of the proposed development (less the indicated subtractions) exceeds the estimated market value of the site absent the establishment of the TIF District and the use of tax increments. DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION Administration of the District will be handled by the HRA Executive Director and Economic Development Manager. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 15 Appendix A: Map of Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and the TIF District ¹º¹º ¹º ñ ñ ñ ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ñ ¹º ñ ñ ñTRACY AVEVERN O N A VEWOODDALE AVEHANSEN RD70TH ST W FRANCE AVE SGLEASONRDEdinaCommunityCenter CityHall SouthviewJr High NormandaleElementary ConcordSchool Cornelia School SouthdaleLibrary FireStation Public Works &Park Maintenance Creek ValleySchool FireStation Valley ViewJr High Edina HighSchool CountrysideSchool HighlandSchool PublicLibrary M innehahaCree kNineMileCree k Nine MileCreek §¨¦494 RICHFIELD MINNEAPOLIS 100 100 62 £¤169 §¨¦494 Eden / Willson Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadBLAKE RDSCHAEFER RDV E R N O N A V E CAHILL RD66TH ST W INTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 44 TH S T W 50TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST W 70TH ST W 76TH ST W DEWEY HILL RD VALLEY VIEW RD VALLEY VIEW RD 78TH ST W £¤169 62 September 2021 ±Eden / Willson TIF District Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area 0 2,100 Feet Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 16 Appendix B: Estimated Cash Flow for the District 9/16/2021Eden / Willson Redevelopment TIF DistrictCity of Edina, MN Mixed-use RedevelopmentASSUMPTIONS AND RATESDistrictType:RedevelopmentDistrict Name/Number:Eden / WillsonCounty District #:TBDExempt Class Rate (Exempt)0.00%First Year Construction or Inflation on Value2023Commercial Industrial Preferred Class Rate (C/I Pref.)Existing District - Specify No. Years RemainingFirst $150,0001.50%Inflation Rate - Every Year:1.00%Over $150,0002.00%Interest Rate:4.00%Commercial Industrial Class Rate (C/I)2.00%Present Value Date:1-Feb-24Rental Housing Class Rate (Rental)1.25%First Period Ending1-Aug-24Affordable Rental Housing Class Rate (Aff. Rental)Tax Year District was Certified:Pay 2022First $174,000 0.75%Cashflow Assumes First Tax Increment For Development: 2025 Over $174,000 0.25%Years of Tax Increment 26 Non-Homestead Residential (Non-H Res. 1 Unit)Assumes Last Year of Tax Increment2050First $500,0001.00%Fiscal Disparities Election [Outside (A), Inside (B), or NA]Inside(B)Over $500,0001.25%Incremental or Total Fiscal DisparitiesIncrementalHomestead Residential Class Rate (Hmstd. Res.)Fiscal Disparities Contribution Ratio33.7904% Pay 2021 First $500,0001.00%Fiscal Disparities Metro-Wide Tax Rate139.5040% Pay 2021 Over $500,0001.25%Maximum/Frozen Local Tax Rate: 107.858% Pay 2021 Agricultural Non-Homestead1.00%Current Local Tax Rate: (Use lesser of Current or Max.) 107.858%Pay 2021 State-wide Tax Rate (Comm./Ind. only used for total taxes) 35.9780% Pay 2021 Market Value Tax Rate (Used for total taxes)0.21097% Pay 2021 Building Total PercentageTax Year Property CurrentClassAfterLand Market Market Of Value Used Original OriginalTaxOriginalAfterConversionMap ID PIDOwner Address Market Value ValueValue for District Market Value Market Value Class Tax Capacity Conversion Orig. Tax Cap.11802824320023Eden Ventures3,078,600 1,000 3,079,600100% 3,079,600 Pay 2022 C/I Pref.60,842 Rental38,495 121802824320029City of Edina000100%0 Pay 2022 Exempt- Rental- 23,078,600 1,000 3,079,6003,079,600 60,84238,495Note:1. Base values are for pay 2022 based upon review of County website on September 13, 2021.2. Located in SD # 273 and WS # 3.Area/ PhaseTax Rates BASE VALUE INFORMATION (Original Tax Capacity)Prepared by Ehlers 9/16/2021Eden / Willson Redevelopment TIF DistrictCity of Edina, MN Mixed-use RedevelopmentEstimated Taxable Total Taxable PropertyPercentage Percentage Percentage Percentage First YearMarket Value Market Value TotalMarketTaxProject Project Tax Completed Completed Completed Completed Full TaxesArea/Phase New Use Per Sq. Ft./Unit Per Sq. Ft./Unit Sq. Ft./UnitsValueClass Tax CapacityCapacity/Unit 2023202420252026 Payable1Apartments 274,490274,490 196 53,800,000 Rental672,5003,431 100%100%100%100%2025Retail300300 3,337 1,001,100 C/I Pref. 19,2726 100%100%100%100%2025TOTAL54,801,100 691,772 Subtotal Residential196 53,800,000 672,500 Subtotal Commercial/Ind.3,337 1,001,100 19,272 Note:1. Market values are based upon preliminary estimates from the Assessor's Office.Total Fiscal Local Local Fiscal State-wide MarketTax Disparities Tax PropertyDisparities PropertyValueTotal Taxes PerNew Use CapacityTax CapacityCapacityTaxesTaxesTaxesTaxesTaxes Sq. Ft./UnitApartments 672,5000672,500 725,34500113,502 838,847 4,279.83Retail 19,2726,51212,760 13,7639,0856,3942,11231,3539.40TOTAL 691,772 6,512 685,260 739,108 9,0856,394115,614 870,200Note: 1. Taxes and tax increment will vary significantly from year to year depending upon values, rates, state law, fiscal disparities and other factors which cannot be predicted.Total Property Taxes 870,200Current Market Value - Est. 3,079,600less State-wide Taxes (6,394)New Market Value - Est. 54,801,100less Fiscal Disp. Adj. (9,085) Difference 51,721,500less Market Value Taxes (115,614)Present Value of Tax Increment 12,043,964less Base Value Taxes (41,520) Difference 39,677,536Annual Gross TIF 697,588Value likely to occur without Tax Increment is less than:39,677,536 WHAT IS EXCLUDED FROM TIF?MARKET VALUE BUT / FOR ANALYSISTAX CALCULATIONSPROJECT INFORMATION (Project Tax Capacity)Prepared by Ehlers 9/16/2021Tax Increment Cashflow - Page 3Eden / Willson Redevelopment TIF DistrictCity of Edina, MN Mixed-use RedevelopmentTAX INCREMENT CASH FLOWProject Original Fiscal CapturedLocal Annual Semi-Annual State Admin.Semi-Annual Semi-Annual PERIOD% of TaxTax Disparities TaxTax Gross Tax Gross Tax AuditoratNet Tax Present ENDING Tax PaymentOTC Capacity Capacity Incremental CapacityRate Increment Increment 0.36%10% Increment Value Yrs. Year Date- - - - 08/01/24- - - - 02/01/25100% 691,772 (38,495) (6,512) 646,765 107.858% 697,588 348,794 (1,256) (34,754) 312,784 294,744 0.5 2025 08/01/25100% 691,772 (38,495) (6,512) 646,765 107.858% 697,588 348,794 (1,256) (34,754) 312,784 583,708 1 2025 02/01/26100% 698,690 (38,495) (6,577) 653,618 107.858% 704,979 352,489 (1,269) (35,122) 316,098 870,008 1.5 2026 08/01/26100% 698,690 (38,495) (6,577) 653,618 107.858% 704,979 352,489 (1,269) (35,122) 316,098 1,150,694 2 2026 02/01/27100% 705,677 (38,495) (6,643) 660,539 107.858% 712,444 356,222 (1,282) (35,494) 319,446 1,428,791 2.5 2027 08/01/27100% 705,677 (38,495) (6,643) 660,539 107.858% 712,444 356,222 (1,282) (35,494) 319,446 1,701,435 3 2027 02/01/28100% 712,733 (38,495) (6,709) 667,529 107.858% 719,983 359,992 (1,296) (35,870) 322,826 1,971,561 3.5 2028 08/01/28100% 712,733 (38,495) (6,709) 667,529 107.858% 719,983 359,992 (1,296) (35,870) 322,826 2,236,391 4 2028 02/01/29100% 719,861 (38,495) (6,777) 674,589 107.858% 727,598 363,799 (1,310) (36,249) 326,241 2,498,774 4.5 2029 08/01/29100% 719,861 (38,495) (6,777) 674,589 107.858%727,598 363,799 (1,310) (36,249) 326,241 2,756,013 5 2029 02/01/30100% 727,059 (38,495) (6,844) 681,720 107.858% 735,290 367,645 (1,324) (36,632) 329,689 3,010,873 5.5 2030 08/01/30100% 727,059 (38,495) (6,844) 681,720 107.858% 735,290 367,645 (1,324) (36,632) 329,689 3,260,736 6 2030 02/01/31100% 734,330 (38,495) (6,913) 688,922 107.858% 743,058 371,529 (1,338) (37,019) 333,172 3,508,288 6.5 2031 08/01/31100% 734,330 (38,495) (6,913) 688,922 107.858% 743,058 371,529 (1,338) (37,019) 333,172 3,750,986 7 2031 02/01/32100% 741,673 (38,495) (6,982) 696,196 107.858%750,903 375,452 (1,352) (37,410) 336,690 3,991,438 7.5 2032 08/01/32100% 741,673 (38,495) (6,982) 696,196 107.858% 750,903 375,452 (1,352) (37,410) 336,690 4,227,174 8 2032 02/01/33100% 749,090 (38,495) (7,052) 703,543 107.858% 758,828 379,414 (1,366) (37,805) 340,243 4,460,728 8.5 2033 08/01/33100% 749,090 (38,495) (7,052) 703,543 107.858% 758,828 379,414 (1,366) (37,805) 340,243 4,689,702 9 2033 02/01/34100% 756,581 (38,495) (7,122) 710,964 107.858% 766,831 383,416 (1,380) (38,204) 343,832 4,916,554 9.5 2034 08/01/34100% 756,581 (38,495) (7,122) 710,964 107.858% 766,831 383,416 (1,380) (38,204) 343,832 5,138,957 10 2034 02/01/35100% 764,147 (38,495) (7,193) 718,458 107.858% 774,915 387,457 (1,395) (38,606) 347,456 5,359,299 10.5 2035 08/01/35100% 764,147 (38,495) (7,193) 718,458 107.858% 774,915 387,457 (1,395) (38,606) 347,456 5,575,320 11 2035 02/01/36100% 771,788 (38,495) (7,265) 726,028 107.858% 783,079 391,540 (1,410) (39,013) 351,117 5,789,337 11.5 2036 08/01/36100% 771,788 (38,495) (7,265) 726,028 107.858% 783,079 391,540 (1,410) (39,013) 351,117 5,999,157 12 2036 02/01/37100% 779,506 (38,495) (7,338) 733,673 107.858% 791,325 395,663 (1,424) (39,424) 354,814 6,207,029 12.5 2037 08/01/37100% 779,506 (38,495) (7,338) 733,673 107.858% 791,325 395,663 (1,424) (39,424) 354,814 6,410,825 13 2037 02/01/38100% 787,301 (38,495) (7,411) 741,395 107.858% 799,653 399,827 (1,439) (39,839) 358,549 6,612,728 13.5 2038 08/01/38100% 787,301 (38,495) (7,411) 741,395 107.858% 799,653 399,827 (1,439) (39,839) 358,549 6,810,673 14 2038 02/01/39100% 795,174 (38,495) (7,485) 749,194 107.858% 808,065 404,033 (1,455) (40,258) 362,320 7,006,777 14.5 2039 08/01/39100% 795,174 (38,495) (7,485) 749,194 107.858% 808,065 404,033 (1,455) (40,258) 362,320 7,199,036 15 2039 02/01/40100% 803,126 (38,495) (7,560) 757,070 107.858% 816,561 408,281 (1,470) (40,681) 366,130 7,389,508 15.5 2040 08/01/40100% 803,126 (38,495) (7,560) 757,070 107.858% 816,561 408,281 (1,470) (40,681) 366,130 7,576,244 16 2040 02/01/41100% 811,157 (38,495) (7,636) 765,026 107.858% 825,142 412,571 (1,485) (41,109) 369,977 7,761,243 16.5 2041 08/01/41100% 811,157 (38,495) (7,636) 765,026 107.858% 825,142 412,571 (1,485) (41,109) 369,977 7,942,614 17 2041 02/01/42100% 819,269 (38,495) (7,712) 773,061 107.858% 833,809 416,904 (1,501) (41,540) 373,863 8,122,297 17.5 2042 08/01/42100% 819,269 (38,495) (7,712) 773,061 107.858% 833,809 416,904 (1,501) (41,540) 373,863 8,298,456 18 2042 02/01/43100% 827,461 (38,495) (7,789) 781,177 107.858% 842,562 421,281 (1,517) (41,976) 377,788 8,472,975 18.5 2043 08/01/43100% 827,461 (38,495) (7,789) 781,177 107.858% 842,562 421,281 (1,517) (41,976) 377,788 8,644,071 19 2043 02/01/44100% 835,736 (38,495) (7,867) 789,374 107.858% 851,403 425,701 (1,533) (42,417) 381,752 8,813,573 19.5 2044 08/01/44100% 835,736 (38,495) (7,867) 789,374 107.858% 851,403 425,701 (1,533) (42,417) 381,752 8,979,751 20 2044 02/01/45100% 844,093 (38,495) (7,946) 797,652 107.858% 860,332 430,166 (1,549) (42,862) 385,756 9,144,380 20.5 2045 08/01/45100% 844,093 (38,495) (7,946) 797,652 107.858% 860,332 430,166 (1,549) (42,862) 385,756 9,305,780 21 2045 02/01/46100% 852,534 (38,495) (8,025) 806,014 107.858% 869,350 434,675 (1,565) (43,311) 389,799 9,465,674 21.5 2046 08/01/46100% 852,534 (38,495) (8,025) 806,014 107.858% 869,350 434,675 (1,565) (43,311) 389,799 9,622,434 22 2046 02/01/47100% 861,060 (38,495) (8,106) 814,459 107.858% 878,459 439,230 (1,581) (43,765) 393,883 9,777,729 22.5 2047 08/01/47100% 861,060 (38,495) (8,106) 814,459 107.858% 878,459 439,230 (1,581) (43,765) 393,883 9,929,980 23 2047 02/01/48100% 869,670 (38,495) (8,187) 822,988 107.858% 887,659 443,829 (1,598) (44,223) 398,008 10,080,809 23.5 2048 08/01/48100% 869,670 (38,495) (8,187) 822,988 107.858% 887,659 443,829 (1,598) (44,223) 398,008 10,228,680 24 2048 02/01/49100% 878,367 (38,495) (8,269) 831,603 107.858% 896,951 448,475 (1,615) (44,686) 402,175 10,375,169 24.5 2049 08/01/49100% 878,367 (38,495) (8,269) 831,603 107.858% 896,951 448,475 (1,615) (44,686) 402,175 10,518,786 25 2049 02/01/50100% 887,151 (38,495) (8,351) 840,304 107.858% 906,335 453,168 (1,631) (45,154) 406,383 10,661,061 25.5 2050 08/01/50100% 887,151 (38,495) (8,351) 840,304 107.858% 906,335 453,168 (1,631) (45,154) 406,383 10,800,545 26 2050 02/01/51 Total20,743,101 (74,675) (2,066,843) 18,601,584 Present Value From 02/01/2024 Present Value Rate 4.00%12,043,964 (43,358) (1,200,061) 10,800,545 Prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc. - Estimates OnlyN:\Minnsota\EDINA\Housing Economic Redevelopment\TIF\TIF Districts\Eden Willson Ave Redevelopment\Cash flow\Preliminary TIF Cashflow (9.13.2021).xls Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 17 Appendix C: Findings Including But/For Qualifications The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan (TIF Plan) for Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District (the “District”), as required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 are as follows: 1. Finding that Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District is a redevelopment district as defined in M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 10. The District consists of two (2) parcels within the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and their internal and external rights-of-way, abutting roadways and intersections, pedestrian pathways and crossings, all with plans to redevelop the area for redevelopment and construction of a mixed use apartment and retail building. Parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area of the District are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures and more than 50 percent of the buildings in the District, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance. (See Appendix D of the TIF Plan.) 2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District permitted by the TIF Plan. The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future: This finding is supported by the fact that the activities proposed in the TIF Plan meets the City's objectives for redevelopment. The existing property contains substandard buildings whose renovation requires high costs related to demolition, remediation and reconstruction of infrastructure. The redevelopment also requires substantial investment toward public improvements such as local transportation and utility infrastructure and shared public parking. The combination of limited amounts of property available for expansion adjacent to the existing redevelopment site, height/density limitations, and the public and private cost of financing the proposed improvements which Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 18 are essential to the comprehensive redevelopment of the area, this project is feasible only through assistance, in part, from tax increment financing. The developer provided a proforma outlining project sources and uses as well as projected rent, vacancy and financing assumptions. City staff and the City’s financial advisor reviewed the information and have determined that the project is not feasible without assistance due to anticipated rent levels and market returns not supporting the redevelopment costs for this site. The term of assistance for the redevelopment project is expected to be less than the maximum 26-year term of a redevelopment district. The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the TIF Plan: This finding is justified on the grounds that the development intensity and tax base created on currently underutilized and declining property requires site and public improvement costs that are improbable without public assistance. Specifically, the cost of site preparation, demolition, remediation, and public improvements to include transportation and utility infrastructure will add significantly to the total redevelopment cost of any development in this area. Site and public improvements costs necessary to sustain the approved density have made redevelopment infeasible without tax increment assistance. The City reasonably determines that no other redevelopment of similar scope is anticipated on this site without substantially similar assistance being provided to the development. Therefore, the City concludes as follows: a. The City's estimate of the amount by which the market value of the entire District will increase without the use of tax increment financing is $0. b. If the proposed development occurs, the total estimated increase in taxable market value will be $51,721,500. c. The present value of tax increments from the District for the maximum duration of the district permitted by the TIF Plan is estimated to be $12,043,964. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 19 d. Even if some development other than the proposed development were to occur, the Council finds that no alternative would occur that would produce a taxable market value increase greater than $39,677,536 (the amount in clause b less the amount in clause c) without tax increment assistance. 3. Finding that the TIF Plan for the District conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole. The City of Edina Planning Commission reviewed the TIF Plan on 10/13/2021 and approved Resolution PC-B-21-31 to provide written opinion affirming that the TIF Plan conforms to the general development plan of the City. 4. Finding that the TIF Plan for Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area by private enterprise. Through the implementation of the TIF Plan, the City will provide an impetus for the construction of a new mixed-use private development which will result in increased employment in the City and the State of Minnesota, the renovation of substandard properties, increased tax base of the State and add a high-quality development to the City. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 20 Appendix D: Redevelopment Qualifications for the District Report of Inspection Procedures and Results For Determining Qualifications of a Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District as a Redevelopment or Renewal/Renovation District Edina HRA Potential TIF District Eden/Willson Avenue Edina, Minnesota Stantec Project No. 193805291 October 4, 2021 Page 2 Table of Contents PART 1 Executive Summary 3 Purpose of Evaluation 3 Scope of Work 3 Conclusion 4 PART 2 Minnesota Statute 469.174, Subdivision 10 Requirements 4 PART 3 Procedures Followed 6 PART 4 Findings 6 A. Coverage Test 7 B. Condition of Building Test 8 1. Replacement Cost 8 2. Code Deficiencies 8 3. System Condition Deficiencies 9 C. Distribution of Substandard Structures 10 D. Conclusion 10 PART 5 Team Credentials 11 APPENDIX A Map of Potential TIF District APPENDIX B Full Building Estimated Replacement Costs APPENDIX C Building Code and Condition Deficiencies Reports APPENDIX D Code Deficiency Estimated Replacement Costs APPENDIX E Photographs Page 3 PART 1 – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PURPOSE OF EVALUATION Stantec was retained by City of Edina HRA to evaluate the properties within a Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment District (“TIF District”) to be established by the City of Edina. The potential TIF District is located in the City of Edina and includes two parcels (PID: 1802824320023 and PID: 1802824320029). The parcels are bounded by Vernon Avenue South on the north, Willson Road on the east, Eden Avenue on the south, and Highway 100 on the west. (See Figure 1). The purpose of Stantec’s work was to determine whether the potential district meets the statutory requirements for coverage, and whether buildings on these parcels, located within the potential TIF District, meets the qualifications required for a Redevelopment or Renewal/Renovation District. Figure 1 – Potential TIF District Page 4 SCOPE OF WORK The potential TIF District Area is comprised of one parcel containing one (1) commercial building currently owned by Eden Ventures LLC and one parcel containing two (2) historic buildings currently listed on the National Register of Historic Places and owned by the City of Edina. The three buildings in the potential district received an onsite interior and exterior inspection. Building Code and Condition Deficiency Reports for the buildings inspected by Stantec are in Appendix B. CONCLUSION After inspecting and evaluating the property within the potential TIF District and applying current statutory criteria for a Redevelopment or Renewal/Renovation District under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, it is our professional opinion that the potential TIF District does qualify as a Redevelopment or Renewal/Renovation District. The remainder of this report describes the process and findings in detail. PART 2 – MINNESOTA STATUTE 469.174, SUBDIVISION 10 REQUIREMENTS The properties were inspected in accordance with the following requirements under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, which states: Interior Inspection "The municipality may not make such determination [that the building is structurally substandard] without an interior inspection of the property..." Exterior Inspection and Other Means "An interior inspection of the property is not required, if the municipality finds that (1) the municipality or authority is unable to gain access to the property after using its best efforts to obtain permission from the party that owns or controls the property; and (2) the evidence otherwise supports a reasonable conclusion that the building is structurally substandard." Documentation "Written documentation of the findings and reasons why an interior inspection was not conducted must be made and retained under section 469.175, subdivision 3(1)." Qualification Requirements Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(a)requires two tests for occupied parcels: Page 5 1. Coverage Test ”…parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area of the district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures.” The coverage required by the parcel to be considered occupied is defined under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(e), which states: " For purposes of this subdivision, a parcel is not occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures unless 15 percent of the area of the parcel contains buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures.” 2. Condition of Building Test …”and more than 50 percent of the buildings, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance;” 1. Structurally substandard is defined under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(b), which states: “For purposes of this subdivision, "structurally substandard" shall mean containing defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance.” 2. Buildings are not eligible to be considered structurally substandard unless they meet certain additional criteria, as set forth in Subdivision 10(c) which states: "A building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance with the building code applicable to new buildings or could be modified to satisfy the building code at a cost of less than 15 percent of the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and type on the site. The municipality may find that a building is not disqualified as structurally substandard under the preceding sentence on the basis of reasonably available evidence, such as the size, type, and age of the building, the average cost of plumbing, electrical, or structural repairs, or other similar reliable evidence." "Items of evidence that support such a conclusion include recent fire or police inspections, on-site property tax appraisals or housing inspections, exterior evidence of deterioration, or other similar reliable evidence." Page 6 PART 3 – PROCEDURES FOLLOWED Stantec performed interior and exterior inspections of the commercial building located at 4917 Eden Avenue within the Potential TIF District on April 6, 2021 and the two buildings located at 4918 Eden Avenue within the Potential TIF District on August 25, 2021. Visual observations were made of all levels of the commercial buildings, with physical measurements taken where necessary. Construction data is based upon information from various sources, as noted. PART 4 – FINDINGS A. Coverage Test 1. The total square foot area of the parcels was obtained from Hennepin County Property Map GIS mapping and site verification. 2. The total square foot area of building and site improvements on the parcels in the potential TIF District Area were obtained from Hennepin County Property Map GIS mapping, Owner-provided documentation, and site verification. 3. The percentage of coverage for the parcels in the Potential TIF District Area was computed to determine if the parcel meets the 15 percent minimum requirement. Findings: The Potential TIF District Area parcels meet the coverage test under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(e). The following areas are per the Hennepin County GIS Interactive Maps: Page 7 Area of Parcel PID 1802824320023: 2.08 acres or 90,546 square feet Area of Building Footprint: 9,757 square feet per floor (197’-9 3/8” x 49’-4”) PID 1802824320029: 0.58 acres or 25,208 square feet Area of Building Footprints: Historic Cahill School: 1,074 square feet Minnehaha Grange Hall: 1,414 square feet Figure 2 – Coverage Test Aerial View POTENTIAL TIF DISTRICT Parcel ID Parcel Area Coverage Area Coverage Percentage 1802824320023 90,546 SF 72,357 SF 79.9% 1802824320029 25,208 SF 7,059 SF 28.1% Page 8 B. Condition of Building Test 1. Replacement Cost The first step in evaluating a building to determine if it is substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance is to determine its replacement cost. This is the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and type on site. Replacement costs were researched using R.S. Means Cost Works square foot models for 2021. A replacement cost was calculated by first establishing building use (office, retail, restaurant, etc.), building construction type (wood, concrete, masonry, etc.), and building size to obtain the appropriate median replacement cost, which factors in the costs of construction in Edina, Minnesota. Replacement cost includes labor, materials, and the contractor's overhead and profit. Replacement costs do not include architectural design fees, legal fees or other “soft" costs not directly related to construction activities. Replacement cost for each building is tabulated in Appendix C. 2. Code Deficiencies The next step in evaluating a building is to determine what code deficiencies exist with respect to such building. Code deficiencies are those conditions for a building which are not in compliance with current building codes applicable to new buildings in the State of Minnesota. Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c), specifically provides that a building cannot be considered structurally substandard if its code deficiencies are not at least 15 percent of the replacement cost of the building. Thus, it was necessary to determine the extent of code deficiencies for the building in the potential TIF District. The evaluation was made by reviewing all available information with respect to such buildings contained in City Building Inspection records and making interior and exterior inspections of the building. Stantec utilized the 2020 Minnesota State Building Code as the official code for their evaluations. The Minnesota State Building Code is a series of provisional codes written specifically for Minnesota only requirements, adoption of several international codes, and amendments to the adopted international codes. After identifying the code deficiencies in each building, we used R.S. Means Cost Works 2021; Unit and Assembly Costs to determine the cost of correcting the identified deficiencies. We were then able to compare the correction costs with the replacement cost of the building to determine if the costs for correcting code deficiencies meet the required 15 percent threshold. Page 9 Finding: The buildings in the Potential TIF District Area contains code deficiencies exceeding the 15 percent threshold required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c). A complete Building Code and Condition Deficiency report for each building in the Potential TIF District can be found in Appendix B of this report. 3. System Condition Deficiencies System condition deficiencies are a measurement of defects or substantial deterioration in site elements, structure, exterior envelope, mechanical and electrical components, fire protection and emergency systems, interior partitions, ceilings, floors, and doors. The evaluation was made by reviewing all available information contained in City records, as well performing interior and exterior inspections of the buildings. Stantec only identified system condition deficiencies that were visible during our inspection of the building. We did not consider the amount of "service life" used up for a particular component unless it was an obvious part of that component's deficiencies. Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c), provides for the minimum threshold of code deficiencies that must be met in order to consider a building substandard. If a building meets the minimum code deficiency threshold under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c), then in order for such building to be "structurally substandard" under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(b), the building's defects or deficiencies should be of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance." Based on this definition, Stantec re-evaluated each of the buildings that met the code deficiency threshold under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c), to determine if the total deficiencies warranted "substantial renovation or clearance" based on the criteria outlined above. Finding: In our professional opinion, the buildings in the Potential TIF District Area are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance, because of defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance as described in Appendix B. The two buildings on PID 1802824320029 are the Historic Cahill School and Minnehaha Grange Hall. Both buildings are on the National Register of Historic Places. It is our understanding these two buildings will be relocated to a more suitable site due to their historic nature and importance to the City of Edina. Page 10 C. Distribution of Substandard Structures Much of this report has focused on the condition of the building as it relates to requirements identified by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10. It is also important to look at the distribution of the substandard buildings within the geographic area of the Potential TIF District Area. Finding: The substandard buildings are reasonably distributed throughout the geographic area of the Potential TIF District Area (Figure 3). Figure 3 – Distribution of Substandard Structures D. CONCLUSION After inspecting and evaluating the properties within the Potential TIF District and applying current statutory criteria for a Redevelopment or Renewal/Renovation District under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10a, it is our professional opinion that the Potential TIF District does qualify as a Redevelopment or Renewal/Renovation District. The remainder of this report describes our process and findings in detail. Page 11 PART 5 – TEAM CREDENTIALS Stantec Architecture Inc. Bruce P. Paulson – Senior Project Manager/Architect MN Registration #20910 Bruce has more than 45 years of architectural experience as project architect, project manager, and project designer for municipal, governmental, educational, commercial, hospitality, and healthcare clients. He is involved with all phases of the architectural process, from pre-design through construction administration, including specialty consulting in investigations for buildings, building condition surveys, TIF inspections, code reviews, estimating, and specification writing. APPENDIX A Potential Eden/Willson Avenue TIF District Boundary Hennepin County Property Map Date: 5/7/2021 Comments: 1 inch = 100 feet PARCEL ID: 1802824320023 OWNER NAME: Eden Ventures Llc PARCEL ADDRESS: 4917 Eden Ave, Edina MN 55436 PARCEL AREA: 2.08 acres, 90,546 sq ft A-T-B: Torrens SALE PRICE: $4,200,000 SALE DATA: 11/2007 SALE CODE: Excluded From Ratio Studies ASSESSED 2020, PAYABLE 2021 PROPERTY TYPE: Commercial-Preferred HOMESTEAD: Non-Homestead MARKET VALUE: $3,079,600 TAX TOTAL: $99,960.32 ASSESSED 2021, PAYABLE 2022 PROPERTY TYPE: Commercial HOMESTEAD: Non-homestead MARKET VALUE: $3,079,600 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2021 Hennepin County Property Map Date: 8/25/2021 Comments: 1 inch = 200 feet PARCEL ID: 1802824320029 OWNER NAME: City Of Edina PARCEL ADDRESS: 4801 50th St W, Edina MN 55424 PARCEL AREA: 4.51 acres, 196,668 sq ft A-T-B: Both SALE PRICE: SALE DATA: SALE CODE: ASSESSED 2020, PAYABLE 2021 PROPERTY TYPE: Residential HOMESTEAD: Non-Homestead MARKET VALUE: $0 TAX TOTAL: $0.00 ASSESSED 2021, PAYABLE 2022 PROPERTY TYPE: Residential HOMESTEAD: Non-homestead MARKET VALUE: $0 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2021 APPENDIX B 1 EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT FULL BUILDING REPLACEMENT ESTIMATED COSTS May 30, 2021 The first step in evaluating a building to determine if it is substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance is to determine its replacement cost. This is the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and type on site. Replacement costs were researched using R.S. Means Cost Works square foot models for 2021. A replacement cost was calculated by first establishing building use (office, restaurant, etc.), building construction type (wood, concrete, masonry, etc.), and building size to obtain the appropriate median replacement cost, which factors in the costs of construction in Edina, Minnesota. Replacement cost includes labor, materials, and the contractor's overhead and profit. Replacement costs do not include architectural design fees, legal fees, or other “soft" costs not directly related to construction activities. Property ID No. & Property Address: 1802824320023 4917 Eden Avenue General Description of Property: 2-story Commercial Restaurant/Office Building Type of Construction: Concrete block bearing walls at lower level with brick and stone veneer; concrete block and wood stud exterior walls at upper level with brick wainscot, stone accents, and wood siding; built-up roofing system over roof sheathing on wood roof joists Date of Construction: 1973 Story Height: 15’-0” lower level; 12’-0” upper level Building Perimeter: 494’-3” Structure Size: 19,514 GSF Total Estimated Replacement Cost: Restaurant, 4,972 SF $1,176,427.23 Office, 14,542 SF $2,232,722.99 Total Estimated Replacement Cost: $3,409,150.22 Property ID No. & Property Address: 1802824320029 4918 Eden Avenue Inspection Date(s) and Time(s): 8-25-2021, 7:45 a.m. Inspection Type: Interior and exterior. General Description of Property: Historic Cahill School; Single story schoolhouse with full basement Type of Construction: Concrete block foundation walls with stone veneer above grade; wood stud exterior walls at main level with painted wood lap siding; cedar shingles on wood roof joists Date of Construction: 1864 Story Height: 9’-0” lower level; 11’-6” upper level Building Perimeter: 134’-0” Structure Size(s): 2,147 GSF Total Estimated Replacement Cost: $420,623.67 2 Property ID No. & Property Address: 1802824320029 4918 Eden Avenue Inspection Date(s) and Time(s): 8-25-2021, 8:30 a.m. Inspection Type: Interior and exterior. General Description of Property: Grange Hall; Single story grange hall with balcony and full basement Type of Construction: Concrete block foundation walls; wood stud exterior walls at main level with painted wood lap siding; cedar shingles on wood roof joists Date of Construction: 1879 Story Height: 8’-0” lower level; 13’-10” main level; 10’-0” balcony Building Perimeter: 161’-4” Structure Size(s): 3,158 GSF Total Estimated Replacement Cost: $574,060.81 APPENDIX C EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT BUILDING CONDITION AND CODE DEFICIENCIES REPORT August 30, 2021 Property ID No. & Property Address: 1802824320023 4917 Eden Avenue Inspection Date(s) and Time(s): 4-6-2021, 1:00 p.m. Inspection Type: Interior and exterior. General Description of Property: 2-story Commercial Restaurant/Office Building Type of Construction: Concrete block bearing walls at lower level with brick and stone veneer; concrete block and wood stud exterior walls at upper level with brick wainscot, stone accents, and wood siding; built-up roofing system over roof sheathing on wood roof joists Date of Construction: 1973 Story Height: 15’-0” lower level; 12’-0” upper level Building Perimeter: 494’-3” Structure Size(s): 19,514 GSF Total Summary of Deficiencies: It is our professional opinion that this building is Substandard because: o Estimated cost to correct building code deficiencies is more than 15% of the estimated replacement cost. Estimated Replacement Cost: $3,409,150.22 Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: $1,147,368.25 Percentage of Replacement Cost for Building Code Deficiencies: 33.6% Description of Condition Deficiencies • Lower level: restrooms do not comply with current ADA requirements. • Lower level: Entry vestibule depth does not comply with current ADA requirements. • Both stairs do not comply with current requirements for tread depth and riser height. Handrails and guardrails do not comply with current code requirements. • Upper level office entry vestibule: depth does not comply with current ADA requirements. • Upper level: restrooms do not comply with current ADA requirements. • Restaurant: No smoke detectors. • Restaurant: Emergency exit is via exterior catwalk at south wall. Stair at east end of catwalk does not comply with current code requirements for minimum tread depth and maximum riser height. • Interior: Lighting systems do not comply with current energy code. • Interior: Current HVAC systems do not meet current indoor air quality requirements. • Interior: Current fire alarm system does not have strobes. • Exterior: Wall systems do not comply with current code requirements for R-value. • Roof access is via vertical ladder which does not comply with current codes for roof top equipment requiring regular replacement of filters. Current code requires a ships ladder with maximum 60 degree slope. • Built-up roofing systems do not comply with current code requirements for R-value. EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT BUILDING CONDITION AND CODE DEFICIENCIES REPORT August 30, 2021 Property ID No. & Property Address: 1802824320029 4918 Eden Avenue Inspection Date(s) and Time(s): 8-25-2021, 7:45 a.m. Inspection Type: Interior and exterior. General Description of Property: Historic Cahill School; Single story schoolhouse with full basement Type of Construction: Concrete block foundation walls with stone veneer above grade; wood stud exterior walls at main level with painted wood lap siding; cedar shingles on wood roof joists Date of Construction: 1864 Story Height: 9’-0” lower level; 11’-6” upper level Building Perimeter: 134’-0” Structure Size(s): 2,147 GSF Total Summary of Deficiencies: It is our professional opinion that this building is Substandard because: o Estimated cost to correct building code deficiencies is more than 15% of the estimated replacement cost. Estimated Replacement Cost: $420,623.67 Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: $185,183.00 Percentage of Replacement Cost for Building Code Deficiencies: 44% Description of Condition Deficiencies • Lower level: restrooms do not comply with current ADA requirements. • Lower level: No accessible route. • Lower level: Windows are single pane. • Stair to lower level does not comply with current requirements for tread depth and riser height. Handrails and guardrails do not comply with current code requirements. • Main level: Accessible from east side by ramp, but the doors do not comply with current ADA requirements for clear width. Both doors are 34” wide. Door thresholds are not ADA compliant. • Main level: No restrooms. • Main level: Windows are single pane. • Interior: Lighting systems do not comply with current energy code. • Interior: Current HVAC systems do not meet current indoor air quality requirements. • Exterior: Wall systems do not comply with current code requirements for R-value. • Attic: No insulation. Does not comply with current code requirements for R-value. EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT BUILDING CONDITION AND CODE DEFICIENCIES REPORT August 30, 2021 Property ID No. & Property Address: 1802824320029 4918 Eden Avenue Inspection Date(s) and Time(s): 8-25-2021, 8:30 a.m. Inspection Type: Interior and exterior. General Description of Property: Grange Hall; Single story grange hall with balcony and full basement Type of Construction: Concrete block foundation walls; wood stud exterior walls at main level with painted wood lap siding; cedar shingles on wood roof joists Date of Construction: 1879 Story Height: 8’-0” lower level; 13’-10” main level; 10’-0” balcony Building Perimeter: 161’-4” Structure Size(s): 3,158 GSF Total Summary of Deficiencies: It is our professional opinion that this building is Substandard because: o Estimated cost to correct building code deficiencies is more than 15% of the estimated replacement cost. Estimated Replacement Cost: $574,060.81 Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: $257,701.00 Percentage of Replacement Cost for Building Code Deficiencies: 44.9% Description of Condition Deficiencies • Lower level: restrooms do not comply with current ADA requirements. • Lower level: No accessible route. • Lower level: Windows are single pane. • Stairs to lower level and balcony do not comply with current requirements for tread depth and riser height. Handrails and guardrails do not comply with current code requirements. • Main level: No restrooms. • Main level: Windows are single pane. • Balcony: Windows are single pane. • Interior: Lighting systems do not comply with current energy code. • Interior: Current HVAC systems do not meet current indoor air quality requirements. • Interior: No fire alarm system. No fire sprinkler system. • Exterior: Wall systems do not comply with current code requirements for R-value. • Attic: No insulation. Does not comply with current code requirements for R-value. APPENDIX D EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT CODE DEFICIENCY ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT COSTS $98,900.00 Mens Restroom: 1 water closet, 1 urinal, 1 lavatory Womens Restroom: 1 water closets, 1 lavatory $125,350.00 Mens Restrooms (2): 2 water closets, 2 lavatories Womens Restrooms (2): 2 water closets, 2 lavatories Office Restroom: 1 water closet, 1 lavatory, 1 shower Lower level entry upgrade - demolition and new construction Increase depth of entry vestibule to comply with ADA requirements 5'-0" x 8'-0" = 40 SF x $150/SF $6,000.00 $72,800.00 Upper level Office entry upgrade - demolition and new construction Increase depth of entry vestibule to comply with ADA requirements 5'-0" x 8'-0" = 40 SF x $150/SF $6,000.00 $7,500.00 Upgrade lighting systems to meet current codes $243,925.00 Upgrade HVAC system to meet current codes Replace rooftop air handling units with new units - 19,514 SF x $11.75/SF $229,289.50 Upgrade fire alarm system to add strobes to meet current codes Add strobes to existing fire alarm system - 19,514 SF x $1.50/SF $29,271.00 Upgrade exterior walls to meet current R-value code requirements $77,090.00 Replace existing built-up roofing system Remove existing roofing – 9,757 SF x $7.25/SF $70,738.25 $180,504.50 Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies:$1,147,368.25 Property ID No. & Property Address: 1802824320023 4917 Eden Avenue Install smoke detectors – 3,750 SF x $2.00/SF Upper level – 218 SF x $575/SF Add smoke detectors in restaurant Install new 4-ply built-up roofing system w/ 5” polyisocyanurate roof insulation, thermal barrier and vapor barrier 9,757 x $18.50/SF Replace light fixtures; provide daylighting and occupancy sensors for lighting control – 19,514 SF x $12.50/SF Install R-15 insulation, 3-5/8" metal studs @ 24" on center, 5/8" gypsum board taped, sanded and painted - 11,860 SF x $6.50/SF Lower level – 172 SF x $575/SF Restroom upgrade – demolition and new construction Upgrade stairs from lower level to upper level (includes removal) Metal pan stairs for concrete in-fill, picket rail, 26 risers, w/ landing 2 flights of stair - $36,400/flight x 2 1 of 3 EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT CODE DEFICIENCY ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT COSTS HISTORIC CAHILL SCHOOL $68,000.00 Mens Restroom: 1 water closet, 1 lavatory Womens Restroom: 1 water closet, 1 lavatory Upgrade lower level windows to insulating panes (3 windows @ 5 SF each)$1,500.00 $25,200.00 Replace two (2) 34" wide wood doors in east wall with 36" wide wood doors $3,600.00 Upgrade main level windows to insulating panes (6 windows @ 15 SF each)$4,500.00 Upgrade lighting systems to meet current codes $26,838.00 Upgrade HVAC system to meet current codes Replace gas fired forced air furnace with new - 2,147 SF x $11.75/SF $25,228.00 New fire alarm system to meet current codes New fire alarm system - 2,147 SF x $4.50/SF $9,662.00 Upgrade exterior walls to meet current R-value code requirements $10,452.00 Uprgade attic space to meet current R-value code requirements Install R-49 insulation in attic space - 1,074 SF x $9.75/SF $10,203.00 Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies:$185,183.00 Property ID No. & Property Address: 1802824320029 4918 Eden Avenue Restroom upgrade – demolition and new construction Lower level – 120 SF x $575/SF Upgrade stairs from lower level to main level (includes removal) Install R-15 insulation in existing stud wall - 1,608 SF x $6.50/SF Metal pan stairs for concrete in-fill, picket rail, 18 risers, w/ landings Replace light fixtures; provide daylighting and occupancy sensors for lighting control – 2,147 SF x $12.50/SF 2 of 3 EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT CODE DEFICIENCY ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT COSTS HISTORIC GRANGE HALL $68,000.00 Mens Restroom: 1 water closet, 1 lavatory Womens Restroom: 1 water closet, 1 lavatory $22,400.00 $18,200.00 Upgrade main level windows to insulating panes (7 windows @ 24 SF each)$21,000.00 Upgrade balcony level windows to insulating panes (4 windows @ 17 SF each)$9,000.00 Upgrade lighting systems to meet current codes $39,475.00 Upgrade HVAC system to meet current codes Replace gas fired forced air furnace with new - 3,158 SF x $11.75/SF $37,107.00 New fire alarm system to meet current codes New fire alarm system - 3,158 SF x $4.50/SF $14,211.00 Upgrade exterior walls to meet current R-value code requirements $15,730.00 Uprgade attic space to meet current R-value code requirements Install R-49 insulation in attic space - 1,324 SF x $9.75/SF $12,578.00 Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies:$257,701.00 Property ID No. & Property Address: 1802824320029 4918 Eden Avenue Restroom upgrade – demolition and new construction Lower level – 120 SF x $575/SF Upgrade stairs from lower level to main level (includes removal) Metal pan stairs for concrete in-fill, picket rail, 16 risers, w/ landings Replace light fixtures; provide daylighting and occupancy sensors for lighting control – 3,158 SF x $12.50/SF Install R-15 insulation in existing stud wall - 2,420 SF x $6.50/SF Upgrade stairs from main level to balcony (includes removal) Metal pan stairs for concrete in-fill, picket rail, 13 risers, w/ landing 3 of 3 APPENDIX E EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 1 PHOTOS Photo 1: North exterior wall showing brick, stone, and stucco Photo 2: East and north exterior walls showing brick, stone, stucco, and shingled mansards Photo 3: North exterior wall showing brick, wood board and battens, and shingled mansard roof Photo 4: North exterior wall showing brick, stone, wood board and battens, and shingled mansard roof EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 2 PHOTOS Photo 5: West and south exterior walls brick, stone, and board and batten Photo 6: South exterior wall showing stone, brick, wood siding, and shingled mansard roof Photo 7: South exterior wall showing stone, brick, wood siding, and shingled mansard roof Photo 8: South exterior wall showing stone, brick, wood siding, shingled mansard roof, and emergency exit catwalk EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 3 PHOTOS Photo 9: Restroom does not comply with ADA requirements Photo 10: Restroom does not comply with ADA requirements Photo 11: Lower urinal does not comply with ADA clear width requirements Photo 12: Privacy screen missing between urinal and lavatory EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 4 PHOTOS Photo 13: Restroom does not comply with current ADA requirements Photo 14: Restroom does not comply with current ADA requirements Photo 15: Bottom of mirror is too high and does not comply with current ADA requirements Photo 16: Stair tread depth, riser height, and handrails do not comply with current code requirements EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 5 PHOTOS Photo 17: Stair tread depth, riser height, and handrails do not comply with current code requirements Photo 18: Stair tread depth, riser height, and handrails do not comply with current code requirements Photo 19: Lighting does not comply with current energy code requirements Photo 20: Roof drains only. No overflow roof drains. EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 6 PHOTOS Photo 21: Existing built-up roofing system does not comply with current energy code requirements Photo 22: Existing built-up roofing system does not comply with current energy code requirements Photo 23: Rooftop equipment requires regular replacement of filters. Vertical ladder roof access does not meet current codes Photo 24: Rooftop equipment requires regular replacement of filters. Vertical ladder roof access does not meet current codes EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 7 PHOTOS Photo 25: Rooftop equipment requires regular replacement of filters. Vertical ladder roof access does not meet current codes Photo 26: Emergency exit stair tread depth, riser height, and handrails do not comply with current code requirements Photo 27: Historic Cahill School south wall showing lap siding, single-glazed double-hung windows and cedar shingles Photo 28: Historic Cahill School west wall showing lap siding and cedar shingles EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 8 PHOTOS Photo 29: Historic Cahill School north wall showing lap siding, single-glazed double-hung windows and cedar shingles Photo 30: Historic Cahill School east wall showing lap siding, single-glazed double-hung windows and cedar shingles Photo 31: Historic Cahill School accessible wood ramp Photo 32: Historic Cahill School accessible wood ramp and steps EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 9 PHOTOS Photo 33: Historic Cahill School classroom Photo 34: Historic Cahill School coat room and non-ADA compliant accessible entrance through 34” wide door Photo 35: Historic Cahill School non-ADA compliant restroom Photo 36: Historic Cahill School non-ADA compliant restroom EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 10 PHOTOS Photo 37: Historic Cahill School stair tread depth, riser height, and handrails do not comply with current code requirements Photo 38: Minnehaha Grange Hall west elevation with accessible wood ramp and stair Photo 39: Minnehaha Grange Hall south wall showing lap siding, single-glazed double-hung windows and cedar shingles Photo 40: Minnehaha Grange Hall east wall showing lap siding and cedar shingles EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 11 PHOTOS Photo 41: Minnehaha Grange Hall north wall showing lap siding, single-glazed double-hung windows and cedar shingles Photo 42: Minnehaha Grange Hall west wall showing lap siding, single-glazed double-hung windows and cedar shingles Photo 43: Minnehaha Grange Hall meeting room and stage Photo 44: Minnehaha Grange Hall meeting room EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 12 PHOTOS Photo 45: Minnehaha Grange Hall meeting room and balcony Photo 46: Minnehaha Grange Hall meeting room Photo 47: Minnehaha Grange Hall entrance ante room Photo 48: Minnehaha Grange Hall entrance ante room EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 13 PHOTOS Photo 49: Minnehaha Grange Hall stair tread depth, riser height, and handrails do not comply with current code requirements Photo 50: Minnehaha Grange Hall stair tread depth, riser height, and handrails do not comply with current code requirements Photo 51: Minnehaha Grange Hall non-ADA compliant restroom Photo 52: Minnehaha Grange Hall non-ADA compliant restroom EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 14 PHOTOS Photo 53: Minnehaha Grange Hall lower level kitchen/serving counter Photo 54: Minnehaha Grange Hall lower level gathering room Photo 55: Minnehaha Grange Hall stair tread depth, riser height, and handrails do not comply with current code requirements Photo 56: Minnehaha Grange Hall balcony Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 21 Appendix E: Project Description The existing commercial building located at 4917 Eden Avenue is proposed to be redeveloped. The new construction will consist of a new Class “A” mixed-use building with approximately 196 mixed-income apartment units and 3,700 square feet of integrated retail space. The development will be located at the intersection of Eden Avenue and Willson Road and is intended to fulfill a portion of the City’s goal for redevelopment as well as provide affordable housing options. The developer will demolish the existing building, perform environmental remediation, and clear the site for redevelopment. The redevelopment will include site water and sanitary sewer utility improvements, area storm water retention, below grade parking stalls to service the apartment units, surface public parking, and sidewalk and streetscape improvements along Eden Avenue and Willson Road. The developer will encumber portions of the site with permanent public easements to make extensive public realm and streetscape improvements. It will also convey a portion of the parcel to be used for future roadway project or public use. The new apartment building will be 7-stories in height with street level commercial space. The rental housing unit mix includes studio, one-bedroom, two-bedroom, and three-bedroom units. Twenty units of affordable housing (10% of total units) are anticipated, all which will be rent- and occupancy-restricted to households earning at or below 50% of the Area Median Income (AMI). The affordable units will be distributed among the studio, one-bedroom and two-bedroom units and remain for a period of at least 20 years. Site clearance is expected to occur in 2022 and new construction is expected to begin that year with completion of the multifamily building as soon as the close of 2023. Related to the redevelopment of this site, the City also envisions public traffic safety enhancements through public improvements to adjacent portions of Eden Avenue, Willson Road, Grange Road and 50th Street. This work is intended to improve pedestrian and bicyclist routes to and through the TIF District. These new routes are intended to address vehicular safety concerns at each intersection and will improve connectivity between the TIF District and adjacent neighborhoods. A conceptual layout of these potential transportation improvements is included below. These public improvements are anticipated to begin as soon as 2023 and will be completed in phases. Additionally, the Edina HRA proposes that consideration be given to relocate two historic buildings located adjacent to the redevelopment at 4918 Eden Avenue. The Grange Hall was originally located near the intersection of 50th and Wooddale while the Cahill School was originally located near 70th and Cahill. The Grange Hall was relocated to the site in the late 1960s prior to the construction of Highway 100 and its related access ramps. Relocation would allow for further redevelopment of the site and public improvements, as well as an opportunity to identify a more suitable location that allows these historic resources to be more accessible to the community. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 22 At this time, a preferred location for the historic buildings has not been identified and there is no imminent timeline for relocation. If relocation is preferred, tax increment could provide a portion of the relocation expenses. The Edina HRA proposes to utilize incremental property taxes generated from the new apartment building to offset a portion of the apartment building’s financing gap. The HRA proposes to reimburse the developer for qualifying costs incurred in its development through the issuance of a Pay-as-you-go TIF Note upon completion. The HRA and City would bear no obligation to use any other funds to pay the TIF Note. The incremental taxes are also proposed to provide funding for necessitated transportation improvements throughout the TIF District and potential building relocation expenses of the two historic buildings. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS NO PARKING2 12.0'SERVICE DRIVEWAY DROP OFF EDEN AVE. BUILDING FFE=935.50 GFE=925.00 R 45' 13 16 R 45' R 69' R 21' R 10' R 5' COURTYARD, PATIO/AMENITY AREA (SEE LANDSCAPE) CONCRETE TRANSFORMER PAD (COORD. WITH MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL) 18.0'18.0' 8.5'8.5' DOG PARK (SEE LANDSCAPE) ACCESSIBLE STALL, SIGNS, STRIPING, ETC. TYP. - (SEE DETAIL) RETAINING WALL W/ FENCE WHERE WALL IS OVER 2.5' TALL (SEE GRADING PLAN & LANDSCAPE ) FLAT CURB W/ 3' TAPERS (SEE DETAIL) FENCE (SEE LANDSCAPE) HEAVY-DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP. (SEE DETAIL) FUTURE B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP. (SEE MNDOT) FUTURE HEAVY-DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) FUTURE EXIT RAMP (COORDINATE WITH CITY / MNDOT) CONCRETE SIDEWALK (SEE DETAIL) LOADING ZONE FUTURE DRIVEWAY POOL (SEE LANDSCAPE) 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' GROUND LEVEL RESTAURANT (SEE ARCH.) ALTERNATE OUTDOOR SPACE (SEE ARCH.) RETAINING WALL W/ FENCE WHERE WALL IS OVER 2.5' TALL (SEE GRADING PLAN & LANDSCAPE ) 5.0' 5.0' 10.0' 10.0' 15.0' 15.0' 10.0' 10.0' 10.0' BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP. (SEE DETAIL) BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (MATCH EXISTING SECTION) BITUMINOUS TRAIL (MATCH EXISTING SECTION) B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP. (SEE DETAIL) CONCRETE SIDEWALK (SEE DETAIL) 6.0' CONCRETE SIDEWALK (SEE DETAIL) BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (MATCH EXISTING SECTION) SCULPTURE (SEE LANDSCAPE) 24.0' HEAVY-DUTY CONCRETE APRON (SEE DETAIL) B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP. (SEE DETAIL) CONCRETE RISERS W/ RAILING (SEE GRADING, ARCHITECTURAL, & STRUCTURAL) CONCRETE RISERS W/ RAILING (SEE GRADING, ARCHITECTURAL, & STRUCTURAL) COURTYARD CONCRETE SIDEWALK (SEE DETAIL) 6 HEAVY-DUTY CONCRETE APRON (SEE DETAIL) HEAVY-DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) RETAINING WALL W/ FENCE WHERE WALL IS OVER 2.5' TALL (SEE GRADING PLAN & LANDSCAPE )R 77' R 53' 24.0' 9.0' 18.0' 24.0'20.0' 9.0' EXISTING MNDOT CONCRETE RETAINING WALL R 5' R 5' R 5' R 5' R 5' R 5' 4.9' FLUSH CURB 9' TAPER 10' TAPER HEAVY-DUTY CONCRETE APRON (SEE DETAIL) SERVICE D R I V E W A Y 6 Architecture Interior Design Landscape ArchitectureEngineering BoarmanKroos VogelGroupInc. EOE License Number I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professionalunder the laws of the State of Minnesota.BKVTB-30x42Engineer Date XX/XX/XXXX24440 Michael J. St. Martin, PE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 21081.00 © 2016 BKV Group, Inc. EOE SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS NOT F O R CONS T R U C TI O N CERTIFICATION DATE 4917 EDEN AVE. 21081.00 XX/XX/XXXX JBT MJS OWNER/DEVELOPER 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL WARNING: AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUNDGopher State One Call SITE PLAN C2-1 REQUIRED SURFACE ACCESSIBLE PARKING: xxx STALLS* *REQUIRED MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES FOR 101-150 STALLS SURFACE ACCESSIBLE PARKING:xxx STALLS ACCESSIBLE PARKING OFF-STREET PARKING CALCULATIONS PROPOSED SURFACE PARKING PROVIDED: 37 STALLS SITE NOTES 1. ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER THE DETAIL SHEET(S) AND STATE/LOCAL JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS. 2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL BE PROVIDED PER CURRENT ADA STANDARDS AND LOCAL/STATE REQUIREMENTS. 3. ALL CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. TYPICAL FULL SIZED PARKING STALL IS 9' X 18' WITH A 24' WIDE TWO WAY DRIVE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 3.0' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. BITUMINOUS IMPREGNATED FIBER BOARD TO BE PLACED AT FULL DEPTH OF CONCRETE ADJACENT TO EXISTING STRUCTURES AND BEHIND CURB ADJACENT TO DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS. 8. SEE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR SITE LIGHTING. CURRENT ZONING:xxx PROPOSED ZONING:xxx BUILDING SETBACK:xxx TOTAL PROPERTY AREA:2.08 AC. AREA OF DISTURBANCE:2.58 AC. EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA: 1.82 AC PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 1.48 AC. SITE DATA SITE PLAN LEGEND CONCRETE SIDEWALK BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT HEAVY-DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SPECIALTY LANDSCAPE PAVING N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 N N NO PARKINGEDEN AVE. BUILDING FFE=935.50 GFE=925.00 922 923 928 923 924 932 93 3 934 9 2 8 25.00 8.0% 929 93 0 93 1 9 2 2 9 2 3 FG. 39.3 FS 4.0%FG. 29.0 FS 4.0% 10:138.54± EX. 38.27± EX. 35.72 37.14 33.5233.04 33.14 33.50 33.14 32.14 32.46 32.33 32.28 32.26 31.72 32.21 32.79 32.33 32.36 33.40 33.40 33.5033.50 TW=???.??? TW=30.42 BW=25.00 BW=25.00 BW=22.75 TW=28.72 28.12 TW=28.57 TW=28.35 27.61 27.51 30.46 TW=28.20 BW=24.74 BW=23.50 BW=23.50 25.00 26.82 27.83 27.934.9%5. 9% 2.0%5.0%1. 7%5.5%1.0%4.0%4.0%1.0% 2.7%3.0%2.7%33.33 33.39 28.94 28.68 28.20 5.0%2.0%8.0% 1.0%2.0%0.5%35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.20 35.20 35.20 35.20 35.20 35.20 35.20 35.20 35.2035.2035.2035.20 31.10 31.00 31.50 31.63 31.77 31.84 31.78 32.08 34.87 35.35 34.8535.35 35.35 35.02 34.33 33.95 33.63 33.25 32.96 34.69 2.0% 6.7% 7.4%5.6%1.3%4.0%1.6% 1.6%1.6% 34.18 33.00 33.52 33.19 33.98 1.0% 3. 0 % TW=37.60 TW=37.84 TW=37.84 TW=37.10 TW=37.10 TW=37.10 TW=35.30 TW=35.30 TW=35.20 TW=35.20 TW=35.31 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=33.00 BW=32.58 BW=35.20 37.61± EX.37.50± EX.36.80± EX.36.66± EX.0.7%1.0%2.0%1.5%2.4%3.4%3.5%5.5%7.0%26.77 27.0027.39 27.48 25.0024.89 24.00 25.00 9279269259319339349359349339329 3 7 9 3 6 9 3 5 935 934 935 936 937 938 925932 933934 935936937938 939 34.00 36.57 FUTURE FRONTAGE ROAD FUTURE FRONTAGE ROAD FLUSH CURB 9' TAPER 10' TAPER 92 8 8.0% 26.82 27.83 27.93 28.94 28.68 28.20 5.0% 2.0%8.0% 33.1926.77 27.00 27.39 27.48927926 Architecture Interior Design Landscape ArchitectureEngineering BoarmanKroos VogelGroupInc. EOE License Number I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professionalunder the laws of the State of Minnesota.BKVTB-30x42Engineer Date XX/XX/XXXX24440 Michael J. St. Martin, PE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 21081.00 © 2016 BKV Group, Inc. EOE SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS NOT F O R CONS T R U C TI O N CERTIFICATION DATE 4917 EDEN AVE. 21081.00 XX/XX/XXXX JBT MJS OWNER/DEVELOPER 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL WARNING: AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUNDGopher State One Call GRADING PLAN C3-1 N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 N N GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES, GUTTER/FLOW LINE, FACE OF BUILDING, OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.16 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 3. ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES OF TOP SOIL AND SEED/MULCH OR SOD. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED/MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. 4. FOR SITE RETAINING WALLS "TW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT TOP FACE OF WALL (NOT TOP OF WALL), "GW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT WALL GRADE TRANSITION, AND "BW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT BOTTOM FACE OF WALL (NOT BOTTOM OF BURIED WALL COURSES). 5. STREETS MUST BE CLEANED AND SWEPT WHENEVER TRACKING OF SEDIMENTS OCCURS AND BEFORE SITES ARE LEFT IDLE FOR WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS. A REGULAR SWEEPING SCHEDULE MUST BE ESTABLISHED. 6. DUST MUST BE ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED. 7. SEE SWPPP FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND REQUIREMENTS. 8. SEE UTILITY PLANS FOR WATER, STORM AND SANITARY SEWER INFORMATION. 9. SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND BITUMINOUS TAPER LOCATIONS. 10. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR FINAL SITE STABILIZATION. 11. NOTIFY CITY OF EDINA ENGINEERING DEPT. AT 952-826-0371, AT LEAST 24 HOURS PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF STORMWATER BMP'S. NO PARKINGGRAPHIC LEGEND: CIP STANDARD GRAY CONCRETE, BROOM FINISHED, TYP. TURFGRASS: SOD, IRRIGATED (SEE SPEC) PLANTING BED #1: ROCK MULCH, 4" MIN., MIXED SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS PER PLANT SCHEDULE PLANTING BED #2: HARDWOOD MULCH, 4" MIN., MIXED SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS PER PLANT SCHEDULE CIP COLORED CONCRETE, BROOM FINISHED, TYP. SHORTGRASS PRAIRIE, SEED MIX TBD PROPOSED PLANT SCHEDULE: TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering BK V R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_LAND_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:47:23 PMSB BH 2286-05 L101 SITE - PLANTING PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN 1" = 20'-0"L101 1 SITE - PLANTING PLAN QTY SYM COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME PLANTING SIZE PERENNIALS/VINES/ANNUALS 1 ac MAGGIE DALEY ASTILBE Astilbe chinensis 'Maggie Daley'#1 CONT. 1 ca FEATHER REED GRASS Calamagrostis arundinacea var. brachtytricha #1 CONT. 1 hb BLUE ANGEL HOSTA Hosta 'Blue Angel'#1 CONT. 1 hh HAPPY RETURNS DAYLILY Hemerocallis 'Happy Returns'#1 CONT. 1 pa HAMELN FOUNTAIN GRASS Pennisetum alopecuroides 'Hameln'#1 CONT. 1 pt PACHYSANDRA 'Green Carpet'Pachysandra terminalis 'Green Carpet'#1 CONT. 1 pv NORTHWIND SWITCHGRASS Panicum virgatum 'Northwind'#1 CONT. 1 rh WALKER'S LOW CATMINT Nepeta x faassenii 'Walker's Low'#1 CONT. 1 sh PRAIRIE DROPSEED Sporobolus heterolepis #1 CONT. 1 ss LITTLE BLUESTEM 'Blue Heaven'Schizachyrium scoparium 'Minnblue A' (PP17, 310) #1 CONT. ORNAMENTAL TREES 7 AG AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY Amelanchir x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance'2" CAL. 2 BP WHITESPIRE BIRCH (CLUMP)Betula populifolia 'Whitespire'2.5" CAL. 8 CC NORTHERN CLUMP REDBUD Cercis canadensis #20 CONT. 5 SR SUMMER STORM LILAC Syringa reticulata 'Summer Storm' (PPAF)2" CAL. DECIDUOUS TREES 8 AS GREEN MOUNTAIN SUGAR MAPLE Acer saccharum 'Green Mountain'2.5" CAL. 7 BN RIVER BIRCH Betula nigra 2.5" CAL. 6 BP DAKOTA PINNACLE BIRCH Betula platyphylla 'Fargo'2.5" CAL. 3 GB AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO Ginkgo Biloba 'Autumn Gold'2.5" CAL. 8 GT SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST Gleditsia triacanthos var. inermis 'Skycole'2.5" CAL. 6 PT PRAIRIE GOLD ASPEN Populus tremuloides 'NEArb'2.5" CAL. 8 QA QUAKING ASPEN Populous tremuloides #20 CONT. 7 QB SWAMP WHITE OAK Quercus bicolor 2.5" CAL. 5 QW KINDRED SPIRIT OAK Quercus x warei 'Nadler'2.5" CAL. 5 TA AMERICAN SENTRY LINDEN Tilia americana 'MnKSentry'2.5" CAL. DECIDUOUS SHRUBS 1 Bw NORTHERN CHARM BOXWOOD Buxus 'Wilson'#3 CONT. 1 Cc SUGARTINA CLETHRA Clethra alnifolia 'Crystalina' (PP21, 561)#2 CONT. 1 Cf ARCTIC FIRE DOGWOOD Cornus stolonifera 'Farrow' (PP18,523)#5 CONT. 1 Cs CARDINAL DOGWOOD Cornus sericea 'Cardinal'#5 CONT. 1 Ds BUTTERFLY BUSH HONEYSUCKLE Diervilla sessilifolia 'Butterfly'#5 CONT. 1 Dw DWARF WINGED EUONYMOU Euonymous alatus 'Compactus'#10 CONT. 1 Ra GRO LOW SUMAC Rhus aromatica 'Gro Low'#5 CONT. 1 Sm DWARF KOREAN LILAC Syringe meyeri 'Palibin'#5 CONT. 1 Sr RED ELDERBERRY Sambucus racemosa #5 CONT. 1 Ss SEM FALSE SPIREA Sorbaria sorbifolia 'Sem'(PP16,336)#2 CONT. CONIFEROUS TREES 1 JC SPARTAN JUNIPER Juniper chinensis 'Spartan'6' B&B 12 PA NORWAY SPRUCE Picea abies 8' B&B 7 PS WHITE PINE Pinus Strobus 6' B&B CONIFEROUS SHRUBS 1 Cp KING'S GOLD CHAMAECYPARIS Chamaecyparis pisifera 'King's gold'#5 CONT. 1 Ct HEATHERBUN CHAMAECYPARIS Chamaecyparis thyoides 'Heather Bun'#5 CONT. 1 Jh BLUE CHIP JUNIPER Juniperus horizontalis 'Blue Chip'#5 CONT. 1 Jp SEA GREEN JUNIPER Juniperus x pfitseriana 'Sea Green'#5 CONT. 1 Js BLUE FOREST JUNIPER Juniperus sabina 'Blue Forest'#5 CONT. 1 Pb SCHOODIC PINE Pinus banksiana 'Schoodic'#3 CONT. 1 Tc TECHNITO ARBORVITAE Thuja occidentalis 'Bailjohn' (PP15, 850)6' B&B *PLANT SCHEDULE FOR SPECIES REFERENCE ONLY, FINAL QUANTITIES TO BE DETERMINED IRRIGATION NOTE: ALL PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE DRIPLINE IRRIGATION, ALL TURF AREAS TO RECEIVE SPRAY NOZZLES The CITYofEDINAEstablishing the Eden / Willson Tax Increment Financing DistrictEdina City CouncilPublic HearingOctober 19, 2021www.EdinaMN.gov The CITYofEDINA2Photo Source: Minnesota Historic Society1957 aerial photo - Normandale Road- At grade intersections- Cement factory- Halla Nursery- Old Village HallBackgroundBiltmoreCement FactoryHallaCedricsVillage HallBowling The CITYofEDINA3Photo Source: Minnesota Historic SocietyThe large white areas in this 1957 aerial photo shows how much of the Greater SouthdaleBackground1979 aerial photo - Highway 100- New bridges and ramps- Old Public Works facility- Perkins restaurant- Old Village HallEdina Public WorksJerrysPerkinsOLG ChurchBowlingBiltmoreVillage Hall The CITYofEDINA4Photo Source: Minnesota Historic SocietyGrange Hall4918 Eden AveBuilt 1879, relocated 1935 & 1970Background – existing conditionsPerkins (formerly Halla Nursery)4917 Eden AveBuilt 1973Cahill School4918 Eden AveBuilt 1864, relocated1970 The CITYofEDINA54917 Eden Avenue- Restaurant, office and conference facilities- Land has higher value than building- Building deemed “sub-standard” per TIF statuteBackground – existing conditions4918 Eden Avenue- Two historic buildings Grange Hall & Cahill School- Relocated to this site in 30s and 70s- Buildings deemed “sub-standard” per TIF statutes49184917Roadway Network- High peak-hour traffic volume- Lack complete sidewalks- Limited bicycle routes The CITYofEDINA6Background -Community Vision PlansMulti-modal Transportation Options - … improve access for pedestrians and bicyclists...” (SERP 3-4(4); GDF page 7 and GTP pages 23-24)Mixed Use Development… support redevelopment that includes retail, housing and employment in walkable neighborhoods (SERP page 3-4(6))Highway Access… allow for surface roads / off-ramps … safe interchange access to Highway 100 from Vernon, 50th& Eden...” (GDF page 34) The CITYofEDINA7Photo Source: Minnesota Historic SocietySummary of Proposal – westerly viewFINAL REZONING APPROVAL PENDING The CITYofEDINA8Photo Source: Minnesota Historic SocietySummary of Proposal – southeasterly viewFINAL REZONING APPROVAL PENDING The CITYofEDINA9Photo Source: Minnesota Historic SocietySummary of Proposal – roadway conceptFINAL DESIGN APPROVAL PENDING The CITYofEDINA10Photo Source: Minnesota Historic SocietySummary of Proposal – financial gapgapThe developer requested $5.1 million in TIF support over 15-years to make the project viable.This request has been analyzed and evaluated. The budget gap has been confirmed. Term Sheet was prepared August 26, 2021. Full TIF Redevelopment Agreement anticipated to be considered November 3, 2021. The CITYofEDINA11What is TIF?Availability of Property Taxes to Taxing AgenciesAvailability of Property Taxes to Taxing AgenciesAvailability of Property Taxes to Taxing AgenciesAvailability of Property Taxes to Taxing Agencies“Incremental Taxes” Remain in TIF DistrictOriginal + Market Value Taxes Available to AllOriginal + Incremental Taxes Available to AllYear 1Year 26 Year 40+•Economic development financing tool•Governed by Minnesota Statute•Enabled by City Council•“Tax Increment” Financing - uses growth in property tax base to fund private investment and public infrastructureYear 3$54.8 M$3.0 M The CITYofEDINA12What is TIF? – How cities fund projectsOriginal Taxes Available to AllPreferred method in EdinaUsually avoided in Edina (unless special conditions exist)Developer PledgeRoadway Improvements The CITYofEDINAWhat is TIF? – Steps to Establish & Monitor13•Boundaries•Maximum Budget•Term•Qualifications•But-forStep 1)Create “District”•Private developments•Public improvementsStep 2)Consider Funding for Specific Projects•4-year knock down•5-year construction•Annual reporting•De-certificationStep 3) Monitoring & ComplianceAction considered todayAction considered in futurePlan CommissionHRA BoardPublic HearingCity CouncilHRA Board (Oct 28 and 2023)City Council (Nov 3 and 2023) The CITYofEDINA14Edina has used TIF financing since the 1970s and currently has 9 active TIF Districts:• 4040 W. 70th• 44th& France 2• 50th& France 2• 66 West• 76thStreet• Amundson• Grandview 2• Pentagon Park• Southdale 2TIF in EdinaProposedEden WillsonTIF District The CITYofEDINATIF in Edina is used on a limited basis and to a lesser extent than neighboring citiesTIF in Edina5.0% in 202115 The CITYofEDINA•2 parcels & adjacent roadways•“Redevelopment” District•25 year term•Original Tax Capacity = $60,842•Projected Tax Capacity = $691,772- Used to establish maximum budget16Proposed TIF Plan The CITYofEDINA$22.7 million - Incremental Property Tax Estimate•Over 26 years term•Includes interest earnings•Excludes base taxes to County, School, and City17Projected Uses of Tax Increment Funds•Acquisition $3.0 M (11%)•Site improvements $750k•Utilities $1.5 M•Affordable Housing $2.06 M (9%)•Other Improvements $5.55 M (24%)•Administrative $2.06 M (9%)•Interest $7.8 M (34%)•Total $22.7 MillionPages 8-9 of TIF PlanProposed TIF Plan –Sources and Uses The CITYofEDINAIn Conclusion: it is not reasonably expected that the proposed redevelopment with long-term affordable housing and public improvements will be constructed without the use of Tax Increment Financing.•Site qualifies as a Redevelopment TIF District•Plans complies with the City’s general plans for redevelopment (Comp. Plan)•High development costs and restricted rental income creates a financial gap that that hinders the delivery of the proposal18Proposed TIF Plan –Findingsgap The CITYofEDINA19Questions / Discussion Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Tom Swenson, Assistant Director Parks & Natural Resources Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-80: Weed Mowing Special Assessment, Improvement No. WD-21 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2021-80 Weed Mowing Special Assessment, Improvement No. WD-21. INTRODUCTION: Since the public hearing, staff removed 6708 Cornelia Drive from the assessment roll. The owner bought a mower and has been mowing the property after receiving the notifications. In the fall of 2020 and summer of 2021, the Parks & Recreation Maintenance Department cut the weeds on 12 properties. T he properties and cost associated with the use of a tractor and staff time to cut the weeds is provided on the attached assessment roll. Each cost should be assessed to the property owner for the payment to the city. According to the Edina City Code Chapter 30 Division 2 Maintenance Standards, Sub Section 30-119 Weeds, “Weeds shall be regularly cut or controlled such that no individual plant shall exceed, at any time, ten inches in height or length, as measured from its base at the ground to the tip of each stalk, stem, blade or leaf. Noxious weeds, as defined by the state commissioner of agriculture, shall be eradicated.” ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-80: Weed Mowing Special Assessment Assessment Roll Staff Presentation RESOLUTION NO. 2021-80 LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. WD-21 WEED MOWING WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed special assessments for improvements listed below: Weed Mowing Improvement No. WD-21 – Various Properties with the City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. Each special assessment as set forth in the special assessments roll on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in herein found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the special assessments levied against it. 2. The special assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments together with interest at a rate of 6.5% per annum, on the entire special assessments from the date hereof to December 31, 2022. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: NAME OF IMPROVEMENT NUMBER OF INSTALLMENTS Weed Mowing WD-21 Levy No. 21100 1 year 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special assessment to the County Auditor, partially prepay an amount not less than 25% of the whole assessment to the City Treasurer and no interest shall be charged on the portion of the assessment prepaid; or pay the whole of the special assessments on such property, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire special assessment is paid on or before Nov. 19, 2021 following the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the special assessments remaining unpaid. Such payment must be made on or before Nov. 19. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of these special assessments to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such special assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Resolution No. 2021-80 Page Two Adopted this 19th day of October, 2021 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of Oct. 19, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of ___________________, 2021. City Clerk 2021 WEED MOWING Weed Mowing Assessment Roll Owner Property ID Address Hrs. Mowed Date Mowed Amount Admin Fee Total Due Hamid Azadegan 30-117-21-21-0002 6655 2nd St. S.1 8/6/2021 $75/hr $75.00 17559 Toft Cove $30.00 $30.00 Eden Prairie, MN 55347 $105.00 Le Truong 28-117-21-31-0036 5101 W. 49th St. (36)1 9/15/2020 $75/hr $75.00 1 5/29/2021 $75/hr $75.00 1 8/24/2021 $75/hr $75.00 $30.00 $30.00 $255.00 Gail and George Rector 33-117-21-33-0099 5224 62nd St. W. (36)2 7/13/2021 $75/hr $150.00 $30.00 $30.00 $180.00 Diane Kuss 31-117-21-14-0064 5718 Blake Rd. (36)1 6/30/2021 $75/hr $75.00 $30.00 $30.00 $105.00 MJL Homes LLC 07-028-24-43-0088 4311 Branson St.1 9/1/2020 $75/hr $75.00 18624 Kalmar Trail $30.00 $30.00 Lakeville, MN 55044 $105.00 Matthew & Rosina Weeres 30-028-24-42-0010 6708 Cornelia Dr.2 8/6/2021 $75/hr 6312 Brookview Ave. Edina, MN 55424 Owner purchased mower and is in compliance REMOVED FROM ROLL M. Ross 30-117-21-21-0033 312 Harrison Ave. (343)2 7/29/2021 $75/hr $150.00 $30.00 $30.00 $180.00 Martha Nemesi 04-116-21-34-0018 5104 Meadow Ridge (39)1 5/29/2021 $75/hr $75.00 $30.00 $30.00 $105.00 Joanne Willmert 04-116-21-31-0043 6630 Normandale Rd. (39)1 6/21/2021 $75/hr $75.00 $30.00 $30.00 $105.00 Midwest Props & R/E LLC 30-117-21-14-0048 6316 Waterman Ave 7 7/15/2021 $75/hr $525.00 14824 Hampshire Ave. S.$30.00 $30.00 Savage, MN 55378 $555.00 2021 WEED MOWING Weed Mowing Assessment Roll Five One Four LLC 04-116-21-24-0037 6440 Wilryan Ave (39)2 6/3/2021 $75/hr $150.00 1 7/24/2021 $75/hr $75.00 $30.00 $30.00 $255.00 Don & Jana Holder 19-028-24-14-0046 5712 Woodland Lane 1 8/23/2021 $75/hr $75.00 P.O. Box 159 $30.00 $30.00 Rancho Sante Fe, CA 92067 $105.00 The CITY ofEDINA Weed Mowing Imp. No. WD-21 Resolution No. 2021-80 The CITY ofEDINA Weed Mowing Assessment •City Code Chapter 30 Division 2 Maintenance Standards, Sub Section 30-119 Weeds •Weeds shall be regularly cut or controlled such that no individual plant shall exceed, at any time, ten inches (10”) in height or length, as measured from its base at the ground to the tip of each stalk, stem, blade or leaf. Noxious weeds, as defined by the state commissioner of agriculture, shall be eradicated. www.EdinaMN.gov 2 The CITY ofEDINA •When weeds exceed 10” in height, Weed Inspector attempts to first reach property owner in person, secondly by phone, lastly by certified letter. •Owner has 10 days to comply. •Park Maintenance staff cut weeds and property is assessed the cost of labor and equipment. •Twelve (12) different properties in 2021 were cut by Park Maintenance staff. www.EdinaMN.gov 3 The CITY ofEDINA Address Amount 6655 2nd Street S.$105.00 5101 W. 49th St.$255.00 5224 62nd St. W.$180.00 5718 Blake Rd. $105.00 4311 Branson St.$105.00 www.EdinaMN.gov 4 The CITY ofEDINA Address *6708 Cornelia Dr. 312 Harrison Ave. 5104 Meadow Ridge 6630 Normandale Rd. 6316 Waterman Ave. Amount $0.00 $180.00 $105.00 $105.00 $555.00 www.EdinaMN.gov 5 *Owner of 6708 Cornelia Dr. has purchased a mower and is in compliance. The CITY ofEDINA Address Amount 6440 Wilryan Ave.$255.00 5712 Woodland Lane $105.00 Each property assessment includes a $30.00 administrative fee. www.EdinaMN.gov 6 The CITY ofEDINARequest Assess all twelve (12) properties for their assigned amount shown above and each for one-year assessments. www.EdinaMN.gov 7 Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Tom Swenson, Assistant Director Parks & Natural Resources Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-81: Tree Removal Special Assessment, Improvement No. TR-21 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2021-81 Tree Removal Special Assessment, Improvement No. TR-21 INTRODUCTION: The attached list of properties collectively had diseased trees that were removed in accordance with City Code Chapter 30, Article IV-Shade Tree Diseases. All property owners were first given an opportunity to remove the diseased tree(s) within a three-week (21 days) period of time. If the tree(s) were not removed within the period of time, the city contracts the removal of the tree(s) and assesses the property owner. The property owners at the addresses attached chose to have the city contract the removal of their tree(s) in 2020 and 2021 and have the cost of the removal or trimming assessed to their property. T his practice prevents the spread of tree diseases or is completed for safety. The guideline used to set the length of the assessment period is: Under $500 – one year assessment $500 to under $1,000 – two year assessment $1,000 and up – three year assessment Additional years upon request ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-81: Tree Removal Special Assessment Assessment Roll Staff Presentation RESOLUTION NO. 2021-81 LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. TR-21 TREE REMOVAL WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed special assessments for improvements listed below: Tree Removal Improvement No. TR-21 – Various Properties with the City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. Each special assessment as set forth in the special assessments roll on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in herein found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the special assessments levied against it. 2. The special assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments together with interest at a rate of 6.5% per annum, on the entire special assessments from the date hereof to December 31, 2022. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: NUMBER OF NAME OF IMPROVEMENT INSTALLMENTS Tree Removal TR-21 Levy No. 21097 1 year Tree Removal TR-21 Levy No. 21098 2 years Tree Removal TR-21 Levy No. 21099 3 years 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special assessment to the County Auditor, partially prepay an amount not less than 25% of the whole assessment to the City Treasurer and no interest shall be charged on the portion of the assessment prepaid; or pay the whole of the special assessments on such property, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire special assessment is paid before Nov. 19, 2021 following the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the special assessments remaining unpaid. Such payment must be made on or before Nov. 19. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of these special assessments to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such special assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Resolution No. 2021-81 Page Two Adopted this 19th day October, 2021 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of Oct. 19, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of ___________________, 2021. City Clerk 2021 TREE REMOVALTree Removal Assessment RollOwnerProperty IDAddressNo. of TreesDateAmountAdmin FeeTotal DueWesley Marquette30-028-24-31-00164520 Balfanz Rd. (35)1 Oak Tree5/19/2021$800.00$30.00$830.00MJ & JA Stanchfield07-116-21-11-00056212 Braeburn Circle (39)1 Elm Tree7/1/2020$2,365.551 Oak Tree2/23/2021$1,075.25Stump Grinding4/11/2021$215.05$30.00$3,685.85Dennis Chornenky28-117-21-21-00525225 Brookside Ct.2 Stem Poplar2/1/2021$1,200.00$30.00$1,230.00Michael & Lesley Flaherty29-117-21-11-000417 Circle W.1 Elm Tree/grinding7/28/2021$2,250.00$30.00$2,280.00Thomas & Torrey Asp05-116-21-42-00016601 Hillside Lane (39)1 Willow Tree7/9/2021$2,000.00Stump Grinding$1,150.00$30.00$3,180.00William Geiger06-116-21-43-00196924 Valley View Rd. (39)1 tree7/15/2021$150.002 hours trimming$30.00$180.00Vicki & David Thomson19-028-24-13-00107 Woodland Rd. (24)1 Oak Tree6/14/2021$12,000.00$30.00$12,030.00 The CITY ofEDINA Tree Removal Imp. No. TR-21 Resolution No. 2021-81 The CITY ofEDINATree Removal Imp. #TR-21 Resolution No. 2021-81 •Under City Code Chapter 30, Article IV, Division 2, Section 30-200, The tree inspector finds and controls the spread of diseased trees. •Under City Code Chapter 24, Article II, Section 24-22 (8), Trees must be clear of vegetative growth to a height of 16’ above the curb or edge of street pavement and sidewalks must be clear to a height of 8’. www.EdinaMN.gov 2 The CITY ofEDINA •City Forester identifies diseased, improper clearance and public safety trees & notifies homeowner by registered mail (21 days to comply). •Homeowners have the option to remove & dispose of these tree(s) on their own. •Seven (7) different properties chose to have the City contract removal or trimming of their trees (9 trees total) in 2021 •City Forester secures quotes from private contractors. •Cost per tree varies greatly depending on size of tree and its location. •City staff does not remove diseased trees from private property. www.EdinaMN.gov 3 The CITY ofEDINA ASSESSMENT YEARS GUIDELINE •Under $500 = one year assessment. •$500 to under $1,000 = two year assessment. •$1,000 and up = three year assessment. •Additional years upon request. www.EdinaMN.gov 4 The CITY ofEDINA ADDRESS TREES COST ASSESSMENT •4520 Balfanz Rd.1 $830.00 2 years •6212 Braeburn Circle 2 $3,685.85 3 years •5225 Brookside Ct.2 $1,230.00 3 years •17 Circle West 1 $2,280.00 3 years •6601 Hillside Lane 1 $3,180.00 3 years •6924 Valley View Rd.1 $180.00 1 year •7 Woodland Rd.1 $12,030.00 3 years Each property assessment includes a $30.00 administrative fee. www.EdinaMN.gov 5 The CITY ofEDINA Request •Assess the seven (7) properties as stated for their assigned assessment and for the number of years stated. www.EdinaMN.gov 6 Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Tom Swenson, Assistant Director of Parks and Natural Resources Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-82: Grandview Business District Special Assessment, Improvement G-21 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2021-82 Grandview Business District Special Assessment, Improvement No. G-21. INTRODUCTION: Attached you will find a Resolution, Analysis of Assessment, Final Assessment Roll, and Certificate of Mailing including the Notice of Public hearing, and other supporting documentation for each proposed assessment. All properties were notified per Minnesota State Statute-Chapter 429 for special assessments. Staff included in the Notice of Public Hearing an invoice for each assessment. The Grandview Business District maintenance assessment changed from $0.00617 per square foot in 2020 to $0.0010013 in 2021. As of this writing, no comments have been submitted or called in. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-82 Grandview Business District Special Analysis of Assessment Assessment Roll Certificate of Mailing Notice of Public Hearing Staff Presentation RESOLUTION NO. 2021-82 A RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed special assessments for the improvement listed below: Grandview Square Business District – Improvement No. G-21 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. Each special assessment as set forth in the special assessment roll on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in herein found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the special assessments levied against it. 2. The special assessment shall be payable in one installment, together with interest at a rate of 6.5% per annum, on the entire special assessments from the date hereof to December 31, 2022. NAME OF IMPROVEMENT INSTALLMENT Grandview Square Business District Levy No. 21102 1 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special assessment to the County Auditor, partially prepay an amount not less than 25% of the whole assessment to the City Treasurer and no interest shall be charged on the portion of the assessment prepaid; or pay the whole of the special assessments on such property, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire special assessment is paid before November 19, 2021 following the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the special assessments remaining unpaid. Such payment must be made before November 19, 2021. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified supplicate of these special assessments to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such special assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted this 19th day of October, 2021. ATTEST: _____________________________ _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 19, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ________ day of _____________________, 2021. __________________________________ City Clerk CITY OF EDINA - ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT FOR:MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. G-21 LOCATION:GRANDVIEW BUSINESS DISTRICT CONTRACTOR: PAYROLL $248.90 EMPLOYER'S SHARE OF PERA $18.70 EMPLOYERS SHARE OF SOCIAL SECURITY & WORK COMP $19.70 EMPLOYERS SHARE OF MEDICAL INSURANCE $57.55 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:$0.00 LAWN IRRIGATION - CITY OF EDINA UTILITIES $120.86 GENERAL SUPPLIES $0.00 TOTAL COST $465.71 ASSESSABLE UNITS:465,101 SQUARE FEET ASSESSABLE COST:0.0010013 PER SQUARE FOOT LENGTH OF ASSESSMENT:1 YEAR PID TAXPAYER ADDRESS 1 CITY STATE ZIP ASSESSMENT 28-117-21-31-0004 Holiday Stationstores #217 P O Box 1224 Bloomington,MN 55440 3.56 28-117-21-31-0007 Ken Johnson Properties LLC 8608 Lakeview Rd Bloomington,MN 55438 3.88 28-117-21-31-0010 PALIA LLC c/o Nancy Grazzini-Olson 1600 W. 82nd Street #100 Bloomington,MN 55431 35.24 28-117-21-31-0027 Orion Investments Edina III, LLC 4530 77th Street West # 365 Edina,MN 55435 5.29 28-117-21-31-0033 TIMCIN Properties LLP 9110 225th St W Lakeville,MN 55044 10.56 28-117-21-31-0043 Children's HeartLink 5075 Arcadia Av Edina,MN 55436 3.71 28-117-21-31-0046 Washburn McReavy c/o Dawn 2301 Dupont Ave South Minneapolis,MN 55421 20.36 28-117-21-31-0064 Grandview 2012 LLC c/o Jerry's Enterprises Inc 5101 Vernon Ave Edina,MN 55436 116.66 28-117-21-31-0065 Asset Accumulation Corp 2909 Bryant Ave S. #300 Minneapolis,MN 55408 19.11 28-117-21-31-0067 CSM Corporation 500 Washington Av, Ste 3000 Minneapolis,MN 55415 25.33 28-117-21-32-0014 Wells Fargo Bank c/o Deloitte Tax LLP P. O. Box 2609 Carlsbad,CA 92018 8.68 28-117-21-33-0004 JKCC LLC 6744 Penn Ave. S.Richfield,MN 55423 1.00 28-117-21-33-0017 EWR Edina Mob L LLC Attn: Jon E Strinden 51 Broadway N. #600 Fargo,ND 58102 9.90 28-117-21-34-0002 Church of Our Lady of Grace 5071 Eden Avenue Edina,MN 55436 5.22 28-117-21-34-0163 CRP/TCC AA II EDINA LLC c/oTrammell Crow Chic Devel 700 Commerce Dr. #455 Oak Brook,IL 60523 26.42 28-117-21-34-0016 Realty Income Props 3 LLC Attn: Portfolio Mgmt 11995 El Camino Real San Diego,CA 92130 2.74 28-117-21-34-0024 EWR Edina Mob L LLC Attn: Jon E Strinden 51 Broadway N. #600 Fargo,ND 58102 6.14 28-117-21-34-0025 ILEX Group Inc.5101 Vernon Av Edina,MN 55436 2.32 28-117-21-33-0048 County of Hennepin Attn: Real Estate Manager 701 4TH AVE S SUITE 400 Minneapolis,MN 55415 20.03 28-117-21-33-0047 City of Edina- Finance 4801 W. 50th Edina,MN 55424 20.03 28-117-21-34-0040 Grandview LLC 5003 Bruce Avenue Edina,MN 55424 116.13 28-117-21-31-0049 City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Edina,MN 55424 3.40 465.71 STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following date September 15, 2021, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for Grandview Business District, Improvement and Maintenance No. G- 21 (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 14 days prior to the date of the hearing. WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 15th day of September, 2021. Edina City Clerk NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. G-21 Property Identification No. 28-117-21-31-0004 Holiday Stationstores #217 P 0 Box 1224 Bloomington, MN 55440 The Edina City Council will meet at 7 p.m., Tuesday, Oct. 5, 2021, at City Hall, 4801 W. 50th St., Edina, MN, to approve and adopt the listed special assessments against the described property, which is part of the Grandview Square Business District: IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE NO. G-2I: Grandview Square Business District The total amount of the proposed special assessment is $465.71. The proposed assessment roll is on file and is available by emailing the City Clerk at sallisonedinamn.gov. The special assessment to this property for improvement and maintenance is $3.56. No invoices will be mailed. This is the only notice you will receive regarding payment. PAYMENT Following the assessment hearing, the owner of any property assessed may pay the whole of the assessment, without interest, to the City, on or before November 19, 2021. Make check payable to the City of Edina and mail to the Assessing Office, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424. If not prepaid by that date, the proposed assessment will be payable together with real estate taxes payable in 2022 with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 6.5% per annum from October 19, 2021 to December 31, 2022. Partial prepayment of the assessment with a minimum of 25 percent, has been authorized by ordinance. APPEAL Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. However, no appeal may be taken as to an assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing. Email notice of appeal to the City Clerk at sallison@edinamn.gov. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL September 21, 2021 Sharon Allison City Clerk The CITYofEDINAGrandview Maintenance Imp. No. G-21Resolution No. 2021-82 The CITYofEDINAGrandview Maintenance Areawww.EdinaMN.gov2 The CITYofEDINAAssessment Costs•Assessable Square Footage = 465,101 Square Feet•Assessable Costs = $465.71 •Proposed Assessment = $0.001 per Square Footwww.EdinaMN.gov3 The CITYofEDINAAssessment Historywww.EdinaMN.gov4 The CITYofEDINAAssessmentwww.EdinaMN.gov5 The CITYofEDINARequest•Assess all properties identified above for their assigned amounts shown.www.EdinaMN.gov6 Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Jessica V. Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-83: Aquatic Vegetation Special Assessment, Improvement No. AQ-21 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2021-83 Aquatic Vegetation Special Assessment, Improvement No. AQ-21. INTRODUCTION: NO COMMENTS were received during the public hearing. See staff report and presentation. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Resolution No. 2021-83 Aquatic Vegetation Special Assessment Resolution No. 2021-83 Aquatic Vegetation Special Assessment Assessment Roll Certificate of Mailing Staff Presentation October 5, 2021 Mayor and City Council Jessica V. Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2021-83 Aquatic Vegetation Special Assessment, Improvement No. AQ-21 Information / Background: The City manages contracts for aeration and aquatic vegetation management services in Arrowhead Lake, Indianhead Lake, Lake Nancy, and Minnehaha Creek Mill Pond as requested by groups that are eligible for the service according to section 15.2.2.4 Lake and Pond Management of the 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan. These groups agree to pay for the services by special assessment. There was a change to the assessment period last year. Prior to the change, the assessment period would cover a full year of services from July 16th through July 15th. For the 2020 assessment last year, a change was made to move to the calendar year. As a result, the 2020 assessment was only for a half year, the latter part of 2019. This year’s assessment (2021) covers a full year of services from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020. This illustration helps describe the assessment period change; 2018 assessment period: July 16, 2017 – July 15, 2018. 2019 assessment period: July 16, 2018 – July 15, 2019. 2020 assessment period: July 16, 2019 – December 31, 2019. 2021 assessment period: January 1, 2020 – December 31, 2020. The reason for this change is to simplify the assessment preparation process. It allows for all invoices to be received well in advance of assessment preparation and provides a clearer summary of the services rendered in a single season versus two half seasons from separate years. This change puts more time, approximately half a year, between when services are rendered and when they are special assessed. Arrowhead Lake services include a summer growing season aquatic herbicide to control submerged plants and algae, lake dye, and aeration (including electrical service). Annual permits from the MN Department of Natural Resources (DNR) are included. Indianhead Lake services are similar, except for control of summer growing season submerged plants. Instead, the Indianhead Lake Association has opted to encourage native aquatic plants which improves fish habitat, reduces phosphorus that cause algae blooms, and can keep invasive aquatic plants from taking over. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Lake Nancy services include an aquatic herbicide to control summer growing season submerged plants and algae. The assessment also includes the cost for a permit from the MN DNR. Minnehaha Creek Mill Pond services include mechanical removal of aquatic vegetation. All waterbodies are eligible for City-funded algae treatments and have been credited accordingly. Property IDs and price per REU are shown in the assessment roll. Each of the waterbodies is assessed a $30.00 administrative fee which is shared among the property owners. Each assessment also includes the cost for staff time to coordinate the services. Staff proposes a one-year assessment period for each special assessment, per the City’s Special Assessments Policy. Staff recommends continuing the public hearing until October 11th and considering adopting Special Assessment Resolution No. 2021-83, Improvement AQ-21 on October 19th. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-83 A RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed special assessments for the improvement listed below: Aquatic Vegetation Improvement – Improvement No. AQ-21 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. Each special assessment as set forth in the special assessment roll on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in herein found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the special assessments levied against it. 2. The special assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments together with interest at a rate of 6.5% per annum, on the entire special assessments from the date hereof to December 31, 2022. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: NUMBER OF NAME OF IMPROVEMENT INSTALLMENTS Aquatic Vegetation Improvement Levy No. 21103 1 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special assessment to the County Auditor, partially prepay an amount not less than 25% of the whole assessment to the City Treasurer and no interest shall be charged on the portion of the assessment prepaid; or pay the whole of the special assessments on such property, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire special assessment is paid before November 19 following the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the special assessments remaining unpaid. Such payment must be made before November 19, 2021. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified supplicate of these special assessments to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such special assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted this 19th day of October, 2021. ATTEST:_____________________________ _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Resolution No. 2021-83 Page 2 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 19, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ________ day of _____________________, 20__. __________________________________ City Clerk PID Amount Lake Name Address 1 Address 2 06-116-21-24-0039 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6322 Mcintyre Pt Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-24-0038 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6311 Mcintyre Pt Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-24-0035 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6432 Timber Ridge Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-24-0034 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6604 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-24-0031 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6516 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-24-0030 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6512 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-24-0026 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6431 Timber Ridge Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-24-0025 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6436 Timber Ridge Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-24-0009 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6520 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-24-0006 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6612 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-24-0001 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6616 Indian Hills Cir Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-23-0062 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6800 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-23-0061 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6804 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-23-0060 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6429 Margarets La Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-23-0056 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6712 Arrowhead Pass Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-23-0029 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6708 Arrowhead Pass Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-23-0025 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6720 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-23-0023 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6728 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-23-0015 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6437 Margarets La Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-23-0014 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6433 Margarets La Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-23-0012 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6808 Margarets La Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-23-0008 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6700 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-22-0057 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6443 Mccauley Ter Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-22-0056 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6320 Post La Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-22-0021 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6312 Post La Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-22-0020 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6316 Post La Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-22-0017 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6411 Mccauley Cir Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-22-0016 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6416 Mccauley Cir Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-22-0014 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6409 Mccauley Cir Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-22-0013 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6405 Mccauley Cir Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-22-0012 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6401 Mccauley Cir Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-21-0116 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6310 Mcintyre Pt Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-21-0115 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6314 Mcintyre Pt Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-21-0114 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6318 Mcintyre Pt Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-21-0069 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6328 Timber Tr Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-21-0068 306.11$ Arrowhead Lake 6327 Timber Tr Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-43-0053 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6820 Cheyenne Cir Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-43-0049 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6926 Valley View Rd Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-43-0035 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6817 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-43-0034 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6813 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-43-0033 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6809 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-43-0032 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6805 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-43-0030 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6801 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-43-0018 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6920 Valley View Rd Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-43-0011 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6800 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-43-0010 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6804 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 PID Amount Lake Name Address 1 Address 2 06-116-21-43-0009 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6808 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-43-0008 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6812 Cheyenne Cir Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-43-0007 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6816 Cheyenne Cir Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-43-0006 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6940 Valley View Rd Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-43-0005 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6936 Valley View Rd Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-43-0004 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6932 Valley View Rd Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-43-0003 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6928 Valley View Rd Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-42-0042 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6704 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-42-0035 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6624 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-42-0034 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6708 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-42-0027 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6700 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-42-0025 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6620 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-42-0024 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6401 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-42-0023 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6405 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-42-0022 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6409 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-42-0019 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6621 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-42-0018 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6625 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-42-0017 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6629 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-34-0060 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6909 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-34-0059 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6905 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-34-0058 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6901 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-31-0003 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6613 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 06-116-21-31-0002 202.32$ Indianhead Lake 6617 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 30-028-24-21-0106 91.86$ Lake Nancy 4509 Nancy La Edina, MN 55424 30-028-24-21-0105 91.86$ Lake Nancy 4505 Nancy La Edina, MN 55424 30-028-24-21-0069 91.86$ Lake Nancy 6321 St Johns Ave Edina, MN 55424 30-028-24-21-0068 91.86$ Lake Nancy 6317 St Johns Ave Edina, MN 55424 30-028-24-21-0067 91.86$ Lake Nancy 6313 St Johns Ave Edina, MN 55424 30-028-24-21-0066 91.86$ Lake Nancy 6309 St Johns Ave Edina, MN 55424 30-028-24-21-0065 91.86$ Lake Nancy 6305 St Johns Ave Edina, MN 55424 30-028-24-21-0031 91.86$ Lake Nancy 4500 64Th St W Edina, MN 55424 30-028-24-21-0030 91.86$ Lake Nancy 4504 64Th St W Edina, MN 55424 30-028-24-21-0028 91.86$ Lake Nancy 6333 Millers La Edina, MN 55424 30-028-24-21-0027 91.86$ Lake Nancy 6329 Millers La Edina, MN 55424 30-028-24-21-0023 91.86$ Lake Nancy 6324 Millers La Edina, MN 55424 30-028-24-21-0022 91.86$ Lake Nancy 4521 Garrison La Edina, MN 55424 30-028-24-21-0020 91.86$ Lake Nancy 4517 Garrison La Edina, MN 55424 30-028-24-21-0019 91.86$ Lake Nancy 4513 Garrison La Edina, MN 55424 30-028-24-21-0018 91.86$ Lake Nancy 4509 Garrison La Edina, MN 55424 30-028-24-21-0017 91.86$ Lake Nancy 4505 Garrison La Edina, MN 55424 30-028-24-21-0016 91.86$ Lake Nancy 4501 Garrison La Edina, MN 55424 30-028-24-21-0015 91.86$ Lake Nancy 4500 Nancy La Edina, MN 55424 30-028-24-21-0010 91.86$ Lake Nancy 4501 Nancy La Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-23-0003 122.22$ Mill Pond 1/3 4800 Woodhill Way Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-23-0002 122.22$ Mill Pond 1/3 4808 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-22-0082 122.22$ Mill Pond 1/3 4804 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 PID Amount Lake Name Address 1 Address 2 18-028-24-22-0081 122.22$ Mill Pond 1/3 4800 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-21-0040 122.22$ Mill Pond 1/3 4513 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-21-0039 122.22$ Mill Pond 1/3 4511 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-21-0038 122.22$ Mill Pond 1/3 4509 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-21-0037 122.22$ Mill Pond 1/3 4507 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-23-0045 244.44$ Mill Pond 2/3 4832 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-23-0044 244.44$ Mill Pond 2/3 4828 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-23-0043 244.44$ Mill Pond 2/3 4824 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-23-0042 244.44$ Mill Pond 2/3 4820 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-22-0091 244.44$ Mill Pond 2/3 4812 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-22-0090 244.44$ Mill Pond 2/3 4808 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-22-0089 244.44$ Mill Pond 2/3 4804 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-22-0078 244.44$ Mill Pond 2/3 4911 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-22-0077 244.44$ Mill Pond 2/3 4909 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-22-0076 244.44$ Mill Pond 2/3 4907 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-22-0075 244.44$ Mill Pond 2/3 4905 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-22-0074 244.44$ Mill Pond 2/3 4903 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-22-0073 244.44$ Mill Pond 2/3 4901 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-22-0072 244.44$ Mill Pond 2/3 4807 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-22-0071 244.44$ Mill Pond 2/3 4805 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-22-0070 244.44$ Mill Pond 2/3 4801 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-31-0002 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4933 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-24-0085 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4640 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-24-0084 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4638 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-24-0083 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4634 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-24-0082 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4630 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-24-0081 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4626 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-24-0077 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4612 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-24-0076 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4610 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-24-0075 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4604 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-24-0074 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4602 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-24-0073 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4600 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-23-0060 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4929 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-23-0059 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4925 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-23-0058 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4622 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-23-0057 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4618 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-23-0056 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4614 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-23-0055 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4520 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-23-0052 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4907 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-23-0051 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4905 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-23-0023 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4921 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-23-0022 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4917 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-23-0021 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4913 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-23-0020 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4909 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-23-0019 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4901 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-22-0093 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4506 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 PID Amount Lake Name Address 1 Address 2 18-028-24-22-0088 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4800 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-22-0087 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4801 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-22-0085 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4805 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-22-0079 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4518 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-22-0069 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4707 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-22-0068 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4705 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-22-0067 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4703 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-22-0066 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4701 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-22-0065 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4605 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-22-0064 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4603 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-22-0063 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4601 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 18-028-24-22-0060 370.37$ Mill Pond 3/3 4504 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE CITY OF EDINA ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following dates September 17, 2021, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for Aquatic Vegetation (Arrowhead Lake, Indianhead Lake, Lake Nancy, and Mill Pond) (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 18 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME ADDRESS WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 17th day of Sept. 2021. ________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk PID Lake Number Street Address 1 Address 2 611621230056 Arrowhead Lake 6712 Arrowhead Pass 6712 Arrowhead Pass Edina, MN 55439 611621230029 Arrowhead Lake 6708 Arrowhead Pass 6708 Arrowhead Pass Edina, MN 55439 611621240001 Arrowhead Lake 6616 Indian Hills Cir 6616 Indian Hills Cir Edina, MN 55439 611621240031 Arrowhead Lake 6516 Indian Hills Rd 6516 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621240009 Arrowhead Lake 6520 Indian Hills Rd 6520 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621230023 Arrowhead Lake 6728 Indian Hills Rd 6728 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621230062 Arrowhead Lake 6800 Indian Hills Rd 6800 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621230061 Arrowhead Lake 6804 Indian Hills Rd 6804 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621240034 Arrowhead Lake 6604 Indian Hills Rd 6604 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621240030 Arrowhead Lake 6512 Indian Hills Rd 6512 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621240006 Arrowhead Lake 6612 Indian Hills Rd 6612 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621230025 Arrowhead Lake 6720 Indian Hills Rd 6720 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621230008 Arrowhead Lake 6700 Indian Hills Rd 6700 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621230012 Arrowhead Lake 6808 Margarets La 6808 Margarets La Edina, MN 55439 611621230060 Arrowhead Lake 6429 Margarets La 6429 Margarets La Edina, MN 55439 611621230015 Arrowhead Lake 6437 Margarets La 6437 Margarets La Edina, MN 55439 611621230014 Arrowhead Lake 6433 Margarets La 6433 Margarets La Edina, MN 55439 611621220017 Arrowhead Lake 6411 Mccauley Cir 6411 Mccauley Cir Edina, MN 55439 611621220016 Arrowhead Lake 6416 Mccauley Cir 6416 Mccauley Cir Edina, MN 55439 611621220012 Arrowhead Lake 6401 Mccauley Cir 6401 Mccauley Cir Edina, MN 55439 611621220014 Arrowhead Lake 6409 Mccauley Cir 6409 Mccauley Cir Edina, MN 55439 611621220013 Arrowhead Lake 6405 Mccauley Cir 6405 Mccauley Cir Edina, MN 55439 611621220057 Arrowhead Lake 6443 Mccauley Ter 6443 Mccauley Ter Edina, MN 55439 611621210114 Arrowhead Lake 6318 Mcintyre Pt 6318 Mcintyre Pt Edina, MN 55439 611621240038 Arrowhead Lake 6311 Mcintyre Pt 6311 Mcintyre Pt Edina, MN 55439 611621210115 Arrowhead Lake 6314 Mcintyre Pt 6314 Mcintyre Pt Edina, MN 55439 611621210116 Arrowhead Lake 6310 Mcintyre Pt 6310 Mcintyre Pt Edina, MN 55439 611621240039 Arrowhead Lake 6322 Mcintyre Pt 6322 Mcintyre Pt Edina, MN 55439 611621220021 Arrowhead Lake 6312 Post La 6312 Post La Edina, MN 55439 611621220056 Arrowhead Lake 6320 Post La 6320 Post La Edina, MN 55439 611621220020 Arrowhead Lake 6316 Post La 6316 Post La Edina, MN 55439 611621240035 Arrowhead Lake 6432 Timber Ridge 6432 Timber Ridge Edina, MN 55439 611621240026 Arrowhead Lake 6431 Timber Ridge 6431 Timber Ridge Edina, MN 55439 611621240025 Arrowhead Lake 6436 Timber Ridge 6436 Timber Ridge Edina, MN 55439 611621210069 Arrowhead Lake 6328 Timber Tr 6328 Timber Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621210068 Arrowhead Lake 6327 Timber Tr 6327 Timber Tr Edina, MN 55439 Page 1 of 2 Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Special Assessment The Edina City Council will meet at 7 p.m. Tuesday, October 5, 2021, to conduct a public hearing to consider approving and adopting the listed special assessment against the described property, which is riparian to Arrowhead Lake: Current Owner 6712 Arrowhead Pass Edina, MN 55439 Property ID 611621230056 Arrowhead Lake IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ-21: Aquatic Vegetation The total amount of services rendered in 2020 was $11,019.96. The total amount of the proposed special assessment to this property for the improvement is $306.11. The proposed assessment roll is on file and is available by emailing the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. No invoices will be mailed. This is the only notice you will receive regarding payment. PAYMENT Following the assessment hearing, the owner of any property assessed may pay the whole of the assessment, without interest, to the City, on or before November 19, 2021. Make check payable to the City of Edina and mail to Assessing Office, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424. If not prepaid by that date, the proposed assessment will be payable together with real estate taxes payable in 2022 with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 6.5% per annum from October 19, 2021 to December 31, 2022. Partial prepayment of the assessment with a minimum of 25 percent of the total assessment, has been authorized by ordinance. APPEAL Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. However, no appeal may be taken as to an assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing. Email notice of appeal to the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. QUESTIONS Questions about the aquatic vegetation services can be directed to Jessica Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator, at jwilson@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0445. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL September 16, 2021 Sharon Allison City Clerk PID Lake Number Street Address 1 Address 2 611621420023 Indianhead Lake 6405 Indian Hills Rd 6405 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621420034 Indianhead Lake 6708 Cheyenne Tr 6708 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621430010 Indianhead Lake 6804 Cheyenne Tr 6804 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621420018 Indianhead Lake 6625 Dakota Tr 6625 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621430053 Indianhead Lake 6820 Cheyenne Cir 6820 Cheyenne Cir Edina, MN 55439 611621340060 Indianhead Lake 6909 Dakota Tr 6909 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621430033 Indianhead Lake 6809 Dakota Tr 6809 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621310002 Indianhead Lake 6617 Dakota Tr 6617 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621420024 Indianhead Lake 6401 Indian Hills Rd 6401 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621420022 Indianhead Lake 6409 Indian Hills Rd 6409 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621310003 Indianhead Lake 6613 Dakota Tr 6613 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621340059 Indianhead Lake 6905 Dakota Tr 6905 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621430005 Indianhead Lake 6936 Valley View Rd 6936 Valley View Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621420019 Indianhead Lake 6621 Dakota Tr 6621 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621430004 Indianhead Lake 6932 Valley View Rd 6932 Valley View Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621430011 Indianhead Lake 6800 Cheyenne Tr 6800 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621420017 Indianhead Lake 6629 Dakota Tr 6629 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621430032 Indianhead Lake 6805 Dakota Tr 6805 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621430008 Indianhead Lake 6812 Cheyenne Cir 6812 Cheyenne Cir Edina, MN 55439 611621430049 Indianhead Lake 6926 Valley View Rd 6926 Valley View Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621430009 Indianhead Lake 6808 Cheyenne Tr 6808 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621420035 Indianhead Lake 6624 Cheyenne Tr 6624 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621430006 Indianhead Lake 6940 Valley View Rd 6940 Valley View Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621430035 Indianhead Lake 6817 Dakota Tr 6817 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621340058 Indianhead Lake 6901 Dakota Tr 6901 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621420042 Indianhead Lake 6704 Cheyenne Tr 6704 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621420025 Indianhead Lake 6620 Cheyenne Tr 6620 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621420027 Indianhead Lake 6700 Cheyenne Tr 6700 Cheyenne Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621430030 Indianhead Lake 6801 Dakota Tr 6801 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621430007 Indianhead Lake 6816 Cheyenne Cir 6816 Cheyenne Cir Edina, MN 55439 611621430003 Indianhead Lake 6928 Valley View Rd 6928 Valley View Rd Edina, MN 55439 611621430034 Indianhead Lake 6813 Dakota Tr 6813 Dakota Tr Edina, MN 55439 611621430018 Indianhead Lake 6920 Valley View Rd 6920 Valley View Rd Edina, MN 55439 Page 1 of 2 Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Special Assessment The Edina City Council will meet at 7 p.m. Tuesday, October 5, 2021, to conduct a public hearing to consider approving and adopting the listed special assessment against the described property, which is riparian to Indianhead Lake: Current Owner 6405 Indian Hills Rd Edina, MN 55439 Property ID 611621420023 Indianhead Lake IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ-21: Aquatic Vegetation The total amount of services rendered in 2020 was $6,676.56. The total amount of the proposed special assessment to this property for the improvement is $202.32. The proposed assessment roll is on file and is available by emailing the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. No invoices will be mailed. This is the only notice you will receive regarding payment. PAYMENT Following the assessment hearing, the owner of any property assessed may pay the whole of the assessment, without interest, to the City, on or before November 19, 2021. Make check payable to the City of Edina and mail to Assessing Office, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424. If not prepaid by that date, the proposed assessment will be payable together with real estate taxes payable in 2022 with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 6.5% per annum from October 19, 2021 to December 31, 2022. Partial prepayment of the assessment with a minimum of 25 percent of the total assessment, has been authorized by ordinance. APPEAL Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. However, no appeal may be taken as to an assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing. Email notice of appeal to the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. QUESTIONS Questions about the aquatic vegetation services can be directed to Jessica Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator, at jwilson@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0445. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL September 16, 2021 Sharon Allison City Clerk PID Lake Number Street Address 1 Address 2 1802824230003 Mill Pond 1/3 4800 Woodhill Way 4800 Woodhill Way Edina, MN 55424 1802824220082 Mill Pond 1/3 4804 Sunnyslope Rd E 4804 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824210038 Mill Pond 1/3 4509 Browndale Ave 4509 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 1802824220081 Mill Pond 1/3 4800 Sunnyslope Rd E 4800 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824210040 Mill Pond 1/3 4513 Browndale Ave 4513 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 1802824210037 Mill Pond 1/3 4507 Browndale Ave 4507 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 1802824230002 Mill Pond 1/3 4808 Sunnyslope Rd E 4808 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824210039 Mill Pond 1/3 4511 Browndale Ave 4511 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 Page 1 of 2 Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Special Assessment The Edina City Council will meet at 7 p.m. Tuesday, October 5, 2021, to conduct a public hearing to consider approving and adopting the listed special assessment against the described property, which is riparian to Mill Pond: Current Owner 4800 Woodhill Way Edina, MN 55424 Property ID 1802824230003 Mill Pond 1/3 IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ-21: Aquatic Vegetation The total amount of services rendered in 2020 was $18,592.49. The total amount of the proposed special assessment to this property for the improvement is $122.22. The proposed assessment roll is on file and is available by emailing the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. No invoices will be mailed. This is the only notice you will receive regarding payment. PAYMENT Following the assessment hearing, the owner of any property assessed may pay the whole of the assessment, without interest, to the City, on or before November 19, 2021. Make check payable to the City of Edina and mail to Assessing Office, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424. If not prepaid by that date, the proposed assessment will be payable together with real estate taxes payable in 2022 with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 6.5% per annum from October 19, 2021 to December 31, 2022. Partial prepayment of the assessment with a minimum of 25 percent of the total assessment, has been authorized by ordinance. APPEAL Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. However, no appeal may be taken as to an assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing. Email notice of appeal to the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. QUESTIONS Questions about the aquatic vegetation services can be directed to Jessica Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator, at jwilson@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0445. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL September 16, 2021 Sharon Allison City Clerk PID Lake Number Street Address 1 Address 2 1802824220073 Mill Pond 2/3 4901 Sunnyside Rd 4901 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824220076 Mill Pond 2/3 4907 Sunnyside Rd 4907 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824220074 Mill Pond 2/3 4903 Sunnyside Rd 4903 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824220071 Mill Pond 2/3 4805 Sunnyside Rd 4805 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824220089 Mill Pond 2/3 4804 Sunnyslope Rd W 4804 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 1802824230045 Mill Pond 2/3 4832 Sunnyslope Rd W 4832 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 1802824230043 Mill Pond 2/3 4824 Sunnyslope Rd W 4824 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 1802824220091 Mill Pond 2/3 4812 Sunnyslope Rd W 4812 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 1802824220090 Mill Pond 2/3 4808 Sunnyslope Rd W 4808 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 1802824220072 Mill Pond 2/3 4807 Sunnyside Rd 4807 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824220078 Mill Pond 2/3 4911 Sunnyside Rd 4911 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824220077 Mill Pond 2/3 4909 Sunnyside Rd 4909 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824230042 Mill Pond 2/3 4820 Sunnyslope Rd W 4820 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 1802824220075 Mill Pond 2/3 4905 Sunnyside Rd 4905 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824230044 Mill Pond 2/3 4828 Sunnyslope Rd W 4828 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 1802824220070 Mill Pond 2/3 4801 Sunnyside Rd 4801 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 Page 1 of 2 Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Special Assessment The Edina City Council will meet at 7 p.m. Tuesday, October 5, 2021, to conduct a public hearing to consider approving and adopting the listed special assessment against the described property, which is riparian to Mill Pond: Current Owner 4901 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 Property ID 1802824220073 Mill Pond 2/3 IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ-21: Aquatic Vegetation The total amount of services rendered in 2020 was $18,592.49. The total amount of the proposed special assessment to this property for the improvement is $244.44. The proposed assessment roll is on file and is available by emailing the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. No invoices will be mailed. This is the only notice you will receive regarding payment. PAYMENT Following the assessment hearing, the owner of any property assessed may pay the whole of the assessment, without interest, to the City, on or before November 19, 2021. Make check payable to the City of Edina and mail to Assessing Office, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424. If not prepaid by that date, the proposed assessment will be payable together with real estate taxes payable in 2022 with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 6.5% per annum from October 19, 2021 to December 31, 2022. Partial prepayment of the assessment with a minimum of 25 percent of the total assessment, has been authorized by ordinance. APPEAL Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. However, no appeal may be taken as to an assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing. Email notice of appeal to the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. QUESTIONS Questions about the aquatic vegetation services can be directed to Jessica Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator, at jwilson@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0445. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL September 16, 2021 Sharon Allison City Clerk PID Lake Number Street Address 1 Address 2 1802824220066 Mill Pond 3/3 4701 Sunnyside Rd 4701 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824230055 Mill Pond 3/3 4520 Browndale Ave 4520 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 1802824240073 Mill Pond 3/3 4600 Browndale Ave 4600 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 1802824220063 Mill Pond 3/3 4601 Sunnyside Rd 4601 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824240076 Mill Pond 3/3 4610 Browndale Ave 4610 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 1802824230058 Mill Pond 3/3 4622 Edgebrook Pl 4622 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 1802824220088 Mill Pond 3/3 4800 Sunnyslope Rd W 4800 Sunnyslope Rd W Edina, MN 55424 1802824220085 Mill Pond 3/3 4805 Sunnyslope Rd E 4805 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824230020 Mill Pond 3/3 4909 Sunnyslope Rd E 4909 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824240074 Mill Pond 3/3 4602 Browndale Ave 4602 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 1802824240077 Mill Pond 3/3 4612 Edgebrook Pl 4612 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 1802824220067 Mill Pond 3/3 4703 Sunnyside Rd 4703 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824230059 Mill Pond 3/3 4925 Sunnyslope Rd E 4925 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824230056 Mill Pond 3/3 4614 Edgebrook Pl 4614 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 1802824230021 Mill Pond 3/3 4913 Sunnyslope Rd E 4913 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824240083 Mill Pond 3/3 4634 Edgebrook Pl 4634 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 1802824230057 Mill Pond 3/3 4618 Edgebrook Pl 4618 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 1802824240085 Mill Pond 3/3 4640 Edgebrook Pl 4640 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 1802824230052 Mill Pond 3/3 4907 Sunnyslope Rd E 4907 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824240075 Mill Pond 3/3 4604 Browndale Ave 4604 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 1802824220065 Mill Pond 3/3 4605 Sunnyside Rd 4605 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824220068 Mill Pond 3/3 4705 Sunnyside Rd 4705 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824220060 Mill Pond 3/3 4504 Browndale Ave 4504 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 1802824220064 Mill Pond 3/3 4603 Sunnyside Rd 4603 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824220087 Mill Pond 3/3 4801 Sunnyslope Rd E 4801 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824310002 Mill Pond 3/3 4933 Sunnyslope Rd E 4933 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824240084 Mill Pond 3/3 4638 Edgebrook Pl 4638 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 1802824230019 Mill Pond 3/3 4901 Sunnyslope Rd E 4901 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824230060 Mill Pond 3/3 4929 Sunnyslope Rd E 4929 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824220069 Mill Pond 3/3 4707 Sunnyside Rd 4707 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 1802824230051 Mill Pond 3/3 4905 Sunnyslope Rd E 4905 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824240081 Mill Pond 3/3 4626 Edgebrook Pl 4626 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 1802824220079 Mill Pond 3/3 4518 Browndale Ave 4518 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 1802824230022 Mill Pond 3/3 4917 Sunnyslope Rd E 4917 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824230023 Mill Pond 3/3 4921 Sunnyslope Rd E 4921 Sunnyslope Rd E Edina, MN 55424 1802824240082 Mill Pond 3/3 4630 Edgebrook Pl 4630 Edgebrook Pl Edina, MN 55424 1802824220093 Mill Pond 3/3 4506 Browndale Ave 4506 Browndale Ave Edina, MN 55424 Page 1 of 2 Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Special Assessment The Edina City Council will meet at 7 p.m. Tuesday, October 5, 2021, to conduct a public hearing to consider approving and adopting the listed special assessment against the described property, which is riparian to Mill Pond: Current Owner 4701 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 Property ID 1802824220066 Mill Pond 3/3 IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ-21: Aquatic Vegetation The total amount of services rendered in 2020 was $18,592.49. The total amount of the proposed special assessment to this property for the improvement is $370.37. The proposed assessment roll is on file and is available by emailing the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. No invoices will be mailed. This is the only notice you will receive regarding payment. PAYMENT Following the assessment hearing, the owner of any property assessed may pay the whole of the assessment, without interest, to the City, on or before November 19, 2021. Make check payable to the City of Edina and mail to Assessing Office, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424. If not prepaid by that date, the proposed assessment will be payable together with real estate taxes payable in 2022 with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 6.5% per annum from October 19, 2021 to December 31, 2022. Partial prepayment of the assessment with a minimum of 25 percent of the total assessment, has been authorized by ordinance. APPEAL Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. However, no appeal may be taken as to an assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing. Email notice of appeal to the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. QUESTIONS Questions about the aquatic vegetation services can be directed to Jessica Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator, at jwilson@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0445. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL September 16, 2021 Sharon Allison City Clerk PID Lake Number Street Address 1 Address 2 3002824210105 Lake Nancy 4505 Nancy La 4505 Nancy La Edina, MN 55424 3002824210067 Lake Nancy 6313 St Johns Ave 6313 St Johns AvEdina, MN 55424 3002824210106 Lake Nancy 4509 Nancy La 4509 Nancy La Edina, MN 55424 3002824210020 Lake Nancy 4517 Garrison La 4517 Garrison LaEdina, MN 55424 3002824210031 Lake Nancy 4500 64Th St W 4500 64Th St W Edina, MN 55424 3002824210016 Lake Nancy 4501 Garrison La 4501 Garrison LaEdina, MN 55424 3002824210019 Lake Nancy 4513 Garrison La 4513 Garrison LaEdina, MN 55424 3002824210018 Lake Nancy 4509 Garrison La 4509 Garrison LaEdina, MN 55424 3002824210068 Lake Nancy 6317 St Johns Ave 6317 St Johns AvEdina, MN 55424 3002824210015 Lake Nancy 4500 Nancy La 4500 Nancy La Edina, MN 55424 3002824210027 Lake Nancy 6329 Millers La 6329 Millers La Edina, MN 55424 3002824210023 Lake Nancy 6324 Millers La 6324 Millers La Edina, MN 55424 3002824210022 Lake Nancy 4521 Garrison La 4521 Garrison LaEdina, MN 55424 3002824210030 Lake Nancy 4504 64Th St W 4504 64Th St W Edina, MN 55424 3002824210066 Lake Nancy 6309 St Johns Ave 6309 St Johns AvEdina, MN 55424 3002824210017 Lake Nancy 4505 Garrison La 4505 Garrison LaEdina, MN 55424 3002824210069 Lake Nancy 6321 St Johns Ave 6321 St Johns AvEdina, MN 55424 3002824210065 Lake Nancy 6305 St Johns Ave 6305 St Johns AvEdina, MN 55424 3002824210010 Lake Nancy 4501 Nancy La 4501 Nancy La Edina, MN 55424 3002824210028 Lake Nancy 6333 Millers La 6333 Millers La Edina, MN 55424 Page 1 of 2 Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Special Assessment The Edina City Council will meet at 7 p.m. Tuesday, October 5, 2021, to conduct a public hearing to consider approving and adopting the listed special assessment against the described property, which is riparian to Lake Nancy: Current Owner 4505 Nancy La Edina, MN 55424 Property ID 3002824210105 Lake Nancy IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ-21: Aquatic Vegetation The total amount of services rendered in 2020 was $1,837.20. The total amount of the proposed special assessment to this property for the improvement is $91.86. The proposed assessment roll is on file and is available by emailing the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. No invoices will be mailed. This is the only notice you will receive regarding payment. PAYMENT Following the assessment hearing, the owner of any property assessed may pay the whole of the assessment, without interest, to the City, on or before November 19, 2021. Make check payable to the City of Edina and mail to Assessing Office, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424. If not prepaid by that date, the proposed assessment will be payable together with real estate taxes payable in 2022 with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 6.5% per annum from October 19, 2021 to December 31, 2022. Partial prepayment of the assessment with a minimum of 25 percent of the total assessment, has been authorized by ordinance. APPEAL Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. However, no appeal may be taken as to an assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing. Email notice of appeal to the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. QUESTIONS Questions about the aquatic vegetation services can be directed to Jessica Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator, at jwilson@EdinaMN.gov or 952-826-0445. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL September 16, 2021 Sharon Allison City Clerk Aquatic Vegetation Improvement No. AQ-21 Resolution No. 2021-83 October 5, 2021 Action and Discussion •Action on public hearing for annual special assessment for aquatic vegetation management services. •Discussion on Mill Pond services –policy and harvester access www.EdinaMN.gov 2 Aquatic Vegetation Management •City-coordinated aquatic vegetation management service. •This is a service requested by homeowners. It is not required by the City or MN Department of Natural Resources. •Aquatic vegetation management is guided by section 15.2.2.4 Lake and Pond Management of the Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan. Per the policy, the City pays for algae treatments in eligible waterbodies. www.EdinaMN.gov 3 36 assessable units. Arrowhead Lake Association incorporated September 2015. www.EdinaMN.gov 4 33 assessable units. The Indianhead Lake Association incorporated in May 2016. www.EdinaMN.gov 5 20 assessable units. The Lake Nancy Lake Association incorporated in February 2016. www.EdinaMN.gov 6 www.EdinaMN.gov 7 Arrowhead Lake 36 at 1.0 REU = $306.11 each Indianhead Lake 33 at 1.0 REU = $202.32 each Lake Nancy 20 at 1.0 REU = $91.86 each Mill Pond 37 at 1.0 REU = $370.37 each 16 at 0.66 REU = $244.44 each 8 at 0.33 REU = $122.22 each •Continue public hearing until October 11th. •Consider adopting Special Assessment Resolution No. 2021-83, Improvement AQ-21 on October 19th. Staff Recommendation www.EdinaMN.gov 8 One-year assessment. •Staff recommendation •Reach out to Mill Pond assessed property owners via direct mail in October 2021. •Continue service under status quo through 2023 season. •For services to continue beyond 2023, require •1. Forming an association consistent with the CWRMP lake and pond management policy and, •2. Approving replacement of the harvester access ramp, agreeing to pay 50% of the cost with the City covering the other 50%. •Mill Pond does not have a formalized association. Mill Pond was not originally included in the 2015 Lakes & Ponds policy amendment to the Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan (CWRMP) which required an incorporated association in order to eligible for services. This policy gap was corrected in the 2018 CWRMP. •Access ramp at Browndale Park is in poor condition and need of replacement. The access must be repaired for coordination of harvesting to continue. Mill Pond –policy and harvester access discussion www.EdinaMN.gov 9 Arrowhead Lake 36 at 1.0 REU = $306.11 each Indianhead Lake 33 at 1.0 REU = $202.32 each Lake Nancy 20 at 1.0 REU = $91.86 each Mill Pond 37 at 1.0 REU = $370.37 each 16 at 0.66 REU = $244.44 each 8 at 0.33 REU = $122.22 each •Continue public hearing until October 11th. •Consider adopting Special Assessment Resolution No. 2021-83, Improvement AQ-21 on October 19th. Staff Recommendation www.EdinaMN.gov 10 One-year assessment. Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Derik Otten, Facility Manager Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-84: 50th & France Business District Special Assessment, Improvement No. M-21 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2021-84 50th & France Business District Special Assessment, Improvement No. M-21. INTRODUCTION: NO COMMENTS were received during the public hearing. The city provides service to the 50th & France Business District. These services include general maintenance and upkeep performed by city employees and management of contracts for other repairs as needed. Services include waste and litter removal, snow and ice management, and upkeep to city owned spaces throughout the district. Attached you will find a Resolution, Analysis of Assessment, Final Assessment Roll, and Certificate of Mailing including the Notice of Public Hearing, and other supporting documentation for each proposed assessment. All properties were notified per Minnesota State Statute – Chapter 429 for special assessments. Staff included in the Notice of Public Hearing an invoice for each assessment. The 50th & France Business District maintenance assessment changed from $0.81503 per square foot in 2020 to $0.98472 per square foot in 2021. T he increase can be attributed to additional maintenance requirements of the Nolan Mains Complex and COVID precautions. As of this writing no comments have been submitted or called in. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-84: 50th & France Business District Special Assessment Assessment Roll Certificate of Mailing Staff Presentation RESOLUTION NO. 2021-84 A RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed special assessments for the improvement listed below: 50th and France Business District – Improvement No. M-21 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. Each special assessment as set forth in the special assessment roll on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in herein found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the special assessments levied against it. 2. The special assessment shall be payable in one installment, together with interest at a rate of 6.5% per annum, on the entire special assessments from the date hereof to December 31, 2021. NAME OF IMPROVEMENT INSTALLMENT 50th and France Business District Levy No. 21101 1 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special assessment to the County Auditor, partially prepay an amount not less than 25% of the whole assessment to the City Treasurer and no interest shall be charged on the portion of the assessment prepaid; or pay the whole of the special assessments on such property, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire special assessment is paid before November 19, 2021 following the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the special assessments remaining unpaid. Such payment must be made before November 19, 2021. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified supplicate of these special assessments to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such special assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted this 19th day of October 2021. ATTEST: _____________________________ _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 19, 2021 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ________ day of _____________________, 20__. __________________________________ City Clerk PID TAXPAYER ADDRESS 1 CITY STATE ZIP Value 18-028-24-14-0016 WILLIAM C KNAPP 5000 WESTOWN PKWAY #400 WEST DES MOINES,IA 50266 $7,409.64 18-028-24-14-0024 49.5 LLC-G.Mikan 5021 Vernon Ave #252 EDINA,MN 55410 $3,679.32 18-028-24-14-0108 Edina Properties, Inc. C/o Jennifer Kent4100 W. 50th Street EDINA,MN 55425 $2,441.96 18-028-24-14-0135 FRANK HOLDINGS LLC 5223 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD EDINA,MN 55439 $10,464.36 18-028-24-14-0134 Benefit Design Assoc.,LLC 4924 France Ave. So.EDINA,MN 55410 $2,097.79 18-028-24-14-0136 4936 France Avenue LLC 5353 Wayzata Blvd. #650 Minneapolis,MN 55416 $4,443.23 18-028-24-14-0118 OMG PROPERTIES LLC 4930 FRANCE AVE S EDINA,MN 55410 $4,158.25 18-028-24-14-0020 FRANCE AVE PARTNERSHIP c/o KCS Property Mgmt8100 12TH AVE S #200 BLOOMINGTON,MN 55425 $5,935.54 18-028-24-14-0021 FRANCE AVE PARTNERSHIP c/o KCS Property Mgmt8100 12TH AVE S #200 BLOOMINGTON,MN 55425 $10,374.22 18-028-24-14-0022 EDINA PROPERTIES INC 4100 50TH ST W, #2100 EDINA,MN 55424 $28,654.30 18-028-24-14-0122 Buhl Carillon LLC Attn: Peter Denovic 5100 Eden Ave Ste. 317 EDINA,MN 55436 $12,810.71 18-028-24-14-0121 JSG COMPANY LLP 5850 OPUS PKWAY, SUITE 108 MINNETONKA,MN 55343 $11,800.06 18-028-24-14-0126 L.A. Real Estate Group ETAL 4100 50TH ST W, #2100 EDINA,MN 55424 $73,081.16 18-028-24-14-0046 First Building Corp. c/o U S Bank NA2800 E. LAKE ST.MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55406 $19,320.78 18-028-24-14-0045 First Building Corp. c/o U S Bank NA2800 E. LAKE ST.MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55406 $3,051.99 18-028-24-41-0144 Edina Market Street LLC Attn: Peter Deanovic 5100 Eden Avenue Edina,MN 55436 $4,790.13 18-028-24-41-0145 Edina Market Street LLC Attn: Peter Deanovic 5100 Eden Avenue Edina,MN 55436 $4,494.22 18-028-24-14-0142 Edina Market Street LLC Attn: Peter Deanovic 5100 Eden Avenue Edina,MN 55436 $25,351.01 18-028-24-41-0178 Lund Real Estate Holdings LLC 4100 50TH ST W #2100 EDINA,MN 55424 $16,756.81 18-028-24-41-0182 A K LARSON FAMILY LLC 3939 50TH ST W #200 EDINA,MN 55424 $36,133.13 18-028-24-41-0050 50th Street Plaza LLC Attn: Paster Dev.5320 W. 23rd Street #205 St. Louis Park,MN 55416 $10,767.56 18-028-24-41-0049 50th Street Plaza LLC Attn: Paster Dev.5320 W. 23rd Street #205 St. Louis Park,MN 55416 $22,516.63 18-028-24-41-0052 JSG COMPANY LLP 5850 OPUS PKWAY, SUITE 108 MINNETONKA,MN 55343 $29,522.04 18-028-24-41-0383 5000 FRANCE COMPANY 5850 OPUS PARKWAY, #108 MINNETONKA,MN 55343 $20,243.11 18-028-24-41-0055 FRANCE AT 50TH LLC 7800 METRO PKWY #300 BLOOMINGTON,MN 55425 $14,903.04 18-028-24-41-0066 5036 FRANCE PROP.LLC Attn: Ryan Burnet5036 FRANCE AVE S EDINA,MN 55410 $6,744.06 18-028-24-41-0237 5050 France Ave. LLC Attn:E.Gerald O'Brien II3948 Market Street EDINA,MN 55424 $12,111.45 18-028-24-41-0181 CITY OF EDINA Edina Liquor Store4801 50TH ST W EDINA,MN 55424 $7,804.77 STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE CITY OF EDINA ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following date, September 20, 2021, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for the 50th & France Business District, Improvement and Maintenance No. M-20 (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 14 days prior to the date of the hearing. WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 20th day of September 2021. Edina City Clerk PID LAST NAME ADDRESS1 CITY STATE ZIP 18-028-24-14-0016 WILLIAM C KNAPP 5000 WESTOWN PKWAY #400 WEST DES MOINES,IA 50266 18-028-24-14-0024 49.5 LLC-G.Mikan 5021 Vernon Ave #252 EDINA,MN 55410 18-028-24-14-0108 Edina Properties, Inc. C/o Jennifer Kent4100 W. 50th Street EDINA,MN 55425 18-028-24-14-0135 FRANK HOLDINGS LLC 5223 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD EDINA,MN 55439 18-028-24-14-0134 Benefit Design Assoc.,LLC 4924 France Ave. So.EDINA,MN 55410 18-028-24-14-0136 4936 France Avenue LLC 5353 Wayzata Blvd. #650 Minneapolis,MN 55416 18-028-24-14-0118 OMG PROPERTIES LLC 4930 FRANCE AVE S EDINA,MN 55410 18-028-24-14-0020 FRANCE AVE PARTNERSHIP c/o KCS Property Mgmt8100 12TH AVE S #200 BLOOMINGTON,MN 55425 18-028-24-14-0021 FRANCE AVE PARTNERSHIP c/o KCS Property Mgmt8100 12TH AVE S #200 BLOOMINGTON,MN 55425 18-028-24-14-0022 EDINA PROPERTIES INC 4100 50TH ST W, #2100 EDINA,MN 55424 18-028-24-14-0122 Buhl Carillon LLC Attn: Peter Denovic 5100 Eden Ave Ste. 317 EDINA,MN 55436 18-028-24-14-0121 JSG COMPANY LLP 5850 OPUS PKWAY, SUITE 108 MINNETONKA,MN 55343 18-028-24-14-0126 L.A. Real Estate Group ETAL 4100 50TH ST W, #2100 EDINA,MN 55424 18-028-24-14-0046 First Building Corp. c/o U S Bank NA2800 E. LAKE ST.MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55406 18-028-24-14-0045 First Building Corp. c/o U S Bank NA2800 E. LAKE ST.MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55406 18-028-24-14-0144 Edina Market Street LLC Attn: Peter Deanovic 5100 Eden Avenue Edina,MN 55436 18-028-24-14-0145 Edina Market Street LLC Attn: Peter Deanovic 5100 Eden Avenue Edina,MN 55436 18-028-24-14-0142 Edina Market Street LLC Attn: Peter Deanovic 5100 Eden Avenue Edina,MN 55436 18-028-24-41-0178 Lund Real Estate Holdings LLC 4100 50TH ST W #2100 EDINA,MN 55424 18-028-24-41-0182 A K LARSON FAMILY LLC 3939 50TH ST W #200 EDINA,MN 55424 18-028-24-41-0050 50th Street Plaza LLC Attn: Paster Dev.5320 W. 23rd Street #205 St. Louis Park,MN 55416 18-028-24-41-0049 50th Street Plaza LLC Attn: Paster Dev.5320 W. 23rd Street #205 St. Louis Park,MN 55416 18-028-24-41-0052 JSG COMPANY LLP 5850 OPUS PKWAY, SUITE 108 MINNETONKA,MN 55343 18-028-24-41-0383 5000 FRANCE COMPANY 5850 OPUS PARKWAY, #108 MINNETONKA,MN 55343 18-028-24-41-0055 FRANCE AT 50TH LLC 7800 METRO PKWY #300 BLOOMINGTON,MN 55425 18-028-24-41-0066 5036 FRANCE PROP.LLC Attn: Ryan Burnet5036 FRANCE AVE S EDINA,MN 55410 18-028-24-41-0237 5050 France Ave. LLC Attn:E.Gerald O'Brien II3948 Market Street EDINA,MN 55424 18-028-24-41-0181 CITY OF EDINA Edina Liquor Store4801 50TH ST W EDINA,MN 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. M-21 18-028-24-14-0016 WILLIAM C KNAPP 5000 WESTOWN PKWAY #400 WEST DES MOINES, IA 50266 The Edina City Council will meet at 7 p.m. Tuesday Oct. 5th, 2021, to approve and adopt the listed special assessments against the described property, which is part of the 50th and France Business District area: IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE NO. M-21: 50th and France The total amount of the proposed special assessment is $411,861.27 The proposed assessment roll is on file and is available by emailing the City Clerk at sallison@edinamn.gov. The special assessment to this property for improvement and maintenance is $7,409.64 No invoices will be mailed. This is the only notice you will receive regarding payment. PAYMENT Following the assessment hearing, the owner of any property assessed may pay the whole of the assessment, without interest, to the City, on or before November 19, 2021. Make check payable to the City of Edina and mail to the Assessing Office, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424. If not prepaid by that date, the proposed assessment will be payable together with real estate taxes payable in 2022 with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 6.5% per annum from October 19, 2021 to December 31, 2022. Partial prepayment of the assessment with a minimum of 25 percent, has been authorized by ordinance. APPEAL Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. However, no appeal may be taken as to an assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing. Email notice of appeal to the City Clerk at sallison@edinamn.gov. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL September 20, 2020 Sharon Allison City Clerk The CITY of EDINA FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARINGS 50th Street & France Avenue Business District 2020 Maintenance Improvement NO. M-21 October 5, 2021 The CITY of EDINALocation Map: www.EdinaMN.gov 2 Shaded Areas: Private Business Footprint The CITY of EDINAAssessment Costs: M-21 Assessable Costs : $411,861.27 Assessable Sq. Footage: 452,347 SF Proposed Assessment: $0.98472/Sq. Ft. *2020 Assessable Costs $345,983.53 *2020 Assessable Sq. Footage: 424,504 SF Increase attributed to Nolan Mains Development & COVID Precautions www.EdinaMN.gov 3 The CITY of EDINAAssessment History www.EdinaMN.gov 4 The CITY of EDINARecommendation: CONTINUE PH UNTIL OCT. 11 CONSIDER APPROVAL ON OCT. 19 APPROVE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION NO. 2021-84 IMPROVEMENT NO. M-21 www.EdinaMN.gov 5 The CITY of EDINA Questions? www.EdinaMN.gov 6 Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-85: West 58th Street Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Special Assessment, Improvement No. BA-456 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2021-85 West 58th Street Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Special Assessment, Improvement No. BA-456. INTRODUCTION: NO COMMENTS were received during the public hearing. A project area map is attached showing all the streets that were reconstructed. One objection was received from 5733 Beard Avenue. The owner has been notified of the next steps in the process if they wish to continue to object. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-85: West 58th Street Special Assessment Assessment Roll Certificate of Mailing Project Area Map West 58th St Post Construction Survey Results Staff Presentation RESOLUTION NO. 2021-85 A RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed special assessments for the improvement listed below: West 58th Street Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction – Improvement No. BA-456 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. Each special assessment as set forth in the special assessment roll on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in herein found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the special assessments levied against it. 2. The special assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments together with interest at a rate of 2.55% per annum, on the entire special assessments from the date hereof to December 31, 2022. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: NUMBER OF NAME OF IMPROVEMENT INSTALLMENTS West 58th Street Levy No. 21105 15 3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special assessment to the County Auditor, partially prepay an amount not less than 25% of the whole assessment to the City Treasurer and no interest shall be charged on the portion of the assessment prepaid; or pay the whole of the special assessments on such property, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire special assessment is paid before November 19 following the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the special assessments remaining unpaid. Such payment must be made before November 19, 2021. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified supplicate of these special assessments to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such special assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted this 19th day of October, 2021. ATTEST:_____________________________ _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Resolution No. 2021-85 Page 2 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 19, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ________ day of _____________________, 20__. __________________________________ City Clerk W 58TH STREET RECONSTRUCTIONIMPROVEMENT NO. BA‐ 456FINAL ASSESSMENTPID Owner House No Street Assessable REU Utility Upgrade Roadway Assessable Amount20‐028‐24‐24‐0088 ERIK & DEBORAH STRAND REV TR 5732 ABBOTT AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐24‐0071 MARCUS SCHMIDT 5733 ABBOTT AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐31‐0071 LEIGH H MYERS 5800 ABBOTT AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐31‐0070 KYLE K WARDIN & K L NELSON 5801 ABBOTT AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐24‐0089 LISA POPE 5733 BEARD AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐23‐0025 AMY DUNLAP & BRETT DUNLAP 5736 BEARD AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐32‐0001 CATHRYN ORR & JAMES SARSET 5800 BEARD AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐31‐0093 BENJAMIN HAROLD GRANNON & KATHERINE JEAN YOUN5801 BEARD AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6519‐028‐24‐42‐0010 JESSICA D KINGSTON 5801 BROOKVIEW AVE 0 $7,790 $0 $7,790.0020‐028‐24‐23‐0026 H PARKHURST JR/E PARKHURST 5733 CHOWEN AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐23‐0009 LESLIE N RUTH 5736 CHOWEN AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐32‐0066 STEPHEN J SMITLEY 5800 CHOWEN AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐32‐0006 STACY MCGRATH & SEAN MCGRATH 5801 CHOWEN AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐23‐0048 STEVEN & KAREN GROEN 5736 DREW AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐23‐0010 JANE E PROSCH‐JENSEN 5737 DREW AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐32‐0072 KATHERINE E RICHARDS 5800 DREW AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐32‐0065 G J BOROWIAK & E B BOROWIAK 5801 DREW AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐23‐0122 JOHN P HUPP & ERIN R HUPP 5737 EWING AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐23‐0014 COREY HICKNER‐JOHNSON & DEREK JOHNSON 5744 EWING AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐32‐0134 BENJAMIN & ANN TOZER 5800 EWING AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐32‐0067 JAMES & PAMELA MOSSEY 5801 EWING AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐23‐0015 DAVID & ROSA LITTEKEN 5733 FRANCE AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6519‐028‐24‐14‐0006 ELIN N OHLSSON 5740 FRANCE AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐32‐0133 ANDREW & ELENA HAWKINS 5801 FRANCE AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6519‐028‐24‐14‐0075 Z E SYCHEV & Y V SYCHEV 4200 PHILBROOK LA 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6519‐028‐24‐13‐0107 D ENGELKE/M ENGELKE REVOC TR 4201 PHILBROOK LA 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6519‐028‐24‐41‐0008 CHASE BAUERNFEIND 3901 W 58TH ST 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6519‐028‐24‐41‐0007 S M PRUDENT & E C PRUDENT 3905 W 58TH ST 1 $0 $9,653.29 $9,653.2919‐028‐24‐41‐0006 RONALD ZIMMER & SHAMA AGTEY 3909 W 58TH ST 1 $0 $9,653.29 $9,653.2919‐028‐24‐14‐0007 S M GABBARD & A B GABBARD 3912 W 58TH ST 1 $0 $9,653.29 $9,653.2919‐028‐24‐41‐0005 CHRISTOPHER KRUG 3913 W 58TH ST 1 $0 $9,653.29 $9,653.2919‐028‐24‐14‐0076 D T TOUSIGNANT/MOLLY E HAGEN 3916 W 58TH ST 1 $0 $9,653.29 $9,653.2919‐028‐24‐41‐0004 KIMBERLY J SCHAAK MELIN 3917 W 58TH ST 1 $0 $9,653.29 $9,653.2919‐028‐24‐14‐0077 STEPHEN REESE & SARAH LEHMAN 3920 W 58TH ST 1 $0 $9,653.29 $9,653.2919‐028‐24‐41‐0003 C DAVIS/K HOFMEISTER DAVIS 3921 W 58TH ST 1 $7,405.00 $9,653.29 $17,058.2919‐028‐24‐14‐0078 A J JARMUZ & J H JARMUZ 3924 W 58TH ST 1 $7,065.00 $9,653.29 $16,718.2919‐028‐24‐14‐0079 D W JEPSON & L P JEPSON 3928 W 58TH ST 1 $0 $9,653.29 $9,653.2919‐028‐24‐14‐0080 R PETERSON & B A PETERSON 3932 W 58TH ST 1 $0 $9,653.29 $9,653.2919‐028‐24‐14‐0081 KENT E OACHS ET AL3936 W 58TH ST 1 $0 $9,653.29 $9,653.2919‐028‐24‐13‐0106 MARC T & KATIE M IWANIN 4304 W 58TH ST 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6519‐028‐24‐13‐0105 SCOTT BEST 4308 W 58TH ST 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6519‐028‐24‐13‐0104 DEANNE E PROBST4312 W 58TH ST 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6519‐028‐24‐13‐0103 GERARDO J FIGARELLA ET AL4316 W 58TH ST 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6519‐028‐24‐13‐0102 L WOLFMAN & M HIRSCHBERG 4320 W 58TH ST 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6519‐028‐24‐13‐0101 M J THOMPSON & L W THOMPSON 4324 W 58TH ST 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.65 W 58TH STREET RECONSTRUCTIONIMPROVEMENT NO. BA‐ 456FINAL ASSESSMENT19‐028‐24‐13‐0100 M & B LUSKIN 4328 W 58TH ST 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6519‐028‐24‐13‐0099 C K GARDNER & KYLE GARDNER 4400 W 58TH ST 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6519‐028‐24‐13‐0098 DIANE K LINDGREN 4404 W 58TH ST 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6519‐028‐24‐13‐0097 RANDY HOLST & SUSAN G NISSEN 4408 W 58TH ST 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6519‐028‐24‐13‐0096 JUDD A MACKINNON ET AL4412 W 58TH ST 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6519‐028‐24‐13‐0095 PETE THIEL4416 W 58TH ST 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6519‐028‐24‐13‐0094 LOIS A NEWELL 4420 W 58TH ST 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6519‐028‐24‐13‐0093 JONATHAN & KRISTINA RICE 4424 W 58TH ST 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6519‐028‐24‐13‐0092 DARREN R TIBBITS 4428 W 58TH ST 0.16 $0 $1,544.53 $1,544.5319‐028‐24‐42‐0073 W HENN AFFORDBL HSG LND TRST 5801 WOODDALE AVE 0.25 $0 $2,413.32 $2,413.3220‐028‐24‐24‐0015 P DOI & L RAMBERG‐DOI 5740 XERXES AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐31‐0001 ALICIA JOHNSON 5800 XERXES AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐24‐0038 RYAN & JORDEN CAVANAUGH 5740 YORK AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐24‐0016 D T WURST & A J HALVERSON 5741 YORK AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐31‐0023 J K JOHNSON & A JOHNSON 5800 YORK AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐31‐0022 MICHELLE WAGENER 5801 YORK AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐24‐0070 S E BJELLAND & F REYES 5736 ZENITH AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐24‐0039 JANE C HANSEN 5741 ZENITH AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐31‐0047 ANDREW ARASHIBA & E ARASHIBA5800 ZENITH AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.6520‐028‐24‐31‐0046 BRADLEY KEITH LOHRDING 5801 ZENITH AVE 0.5 $0 $4,826.65 $4,826.65Total Project Cost 361,129.65$ Total REU 37.41 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE CITY OF EDINA ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following dates September 17, 2021, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for West 58th Street Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, Improvement Nos. BA-456 (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 18 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME ADDRESS WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 17th day of Sept. 2021. ________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk 20-028-24-24-0088 ERIK & DEBORAH STRAND 5732 ABBOTT AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 20-028-24-24-0071 MARCUS SCHMIDT 5733 ABBOTT AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 20-028-24-31-0071 LEIGH H MYERS 5800 ABBOTT AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 20-028-24-31-0070 KYLE K WARDIN & K L NELSON 5801 ABBOTT AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 20-028-24-24-0089 LISA POPE 5733 BEARD AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 20-028-24-23-0025 AMY DUNLAP & BRETT DUNLAP 5736 BEARD AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 20-028-24-32-0001 CATHRYN ORR & JAMES SARSET 4306 PLEASANT AVE MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55409 20-028-24-31-0093 BENJAMIN H GRANNON & KATHERINE J YOUNG GRANNON 5801 BEARD AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 19-028-24-42-0010 JESSICA D KINGSTON 5801 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA, MN 55424 20-028-24-23-0026 H PARKHURST JR/E PARKHURST 5733 CHOWEN AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 20-028-24-23-0009 LESLIE N RUTH 5736 CHOWEN AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 20-028-24-32-0066 STEPHEN J SMITLEY 5800 CHOWEN AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 20-028-24-32-0006 STACY MCGRATH & SEAN MCGRATH 5801 CHOWEN AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 20-028-24-23-0048 STEVEN & KAREN GROEN 5736 DREW AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 20-028-24-23-0010 JANE E PROSCH-JENSEN 5737 DREW AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 20-028-24-32-0072 KATHERINE E RICHARDS 5800 DREW AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 20-028-24-32-0065 GAVIN & ERIN BOROWIAK 5801 DREW AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 20-028-24-23-0122 JOHN P HUPP & ERIN R HUPP 5737 EWING AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 20-028-24-23-0014 COREY HICKNER JOHNSON & DEREK JOHNSON 5744 EWING AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 20-028-24-32-0134 BENJAMIN & ANNE TOZER 5800 EWING AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 20-028-24-32-0067 JAMES & PAMELA MOSSEY 5801 EWING AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 20-028-24-23-0015 DAVID & ROSA LITTEKEN 5733 FRANCE AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 19-028-24-14-0006 ELIN N OHLSSON 5740 FRANCE AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 20-028-24-32-0133 ANDREW & ELENA HAWKINS 5801 FRANCE AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 19-028-24-14-0075 ZOI & YEVGENIY SYCHEV 4200 PHILBROOK LA EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-13-0107 DOUGLAS & MARY ENGELKE 4201 PHILBROOK LA EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-41-0008 CHASE BAUERNFEIND 3901 W 58TH ST EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-41-0007 SONY M PRUDENT 3905 W 58TH ST EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-41-0006 RONALD ZIMMER & SHAMA AGTEY 3909 W 58TH ST EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-14-0007 SEAN & ADRIANA GABBARD 3912 W 58TH ST EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-41-0005 CHRISTOPHER KRUG 3913 W 58TH ST EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-14-0076 D T TOUSIGNANT/MOLLY E HAGEN 3916 W 58TH ST EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-41-0004 KIMBERLY SCHAAK MELIN 3917 W 58TH ST EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-14-0077 STEPHEN REESE & SARAH LEHMAN 3920 W 58TH ST EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-41-0003 C DAVIS/K HOFMEISTER DAVIS 3921 W 58TH ST EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-14-0078 ANDREW & JANELLE JARMUZ 3924 W 58TH ST EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-14-0079 DAVID JEPSON 3928 W 58TH ST EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-14-0080 RICH & ANNE PETERSON 3932 W 58TH ST EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-14-0081 KENT & SUSAN OACHS 3936 W 58TH ST EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-13-0106 MARC T & KATIE M IWANIN 4304 W 58TH ST EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-13-0105 SCOTT BEST 4308 W 58TH ST EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-13-0104 DEANNE E PROBST 4312 W 58TH ST EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-13-0103 GERARDO J FIGARELLA ET AL 4316 W 58TH ST EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-13-0102 L WOLFMAN & M HIRSCHBERG 4320 W 58TH ST EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-13-0101 MARTIN J THOMPSON 4324 W 58TH ST EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-13-0100 MITCHELL & BARBARA LUSKIN 4328 W 58TH ST EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-13-0099 CEZANNE & KYLE GARDNER 4400 W 58TH ST EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-13-0098 DIANE K LINDGREN 4404 W 58TH ST EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-13-0097 RANDY HOLST & SUSAN G NISSEN 4408 W 58TH ST EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-13-0096 JUDD A MACKINNON ET AL 4412 W 58TH ST EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-13-0095 PETE THIEL 1101 WEST MINERAL AVE, #101 LITTLETON, CO 80120 19-028-24-13-0094 LOIS A NEWELL 4420 W 58TH ST EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-13-0093 JONATHAN & KRISTINA RICE 4424 W 58TH ST EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-13-0092 DARREN R TIBBITS 4428 W 58TH ST EDINA, MN 55424 19-028-24-42-0073 W HENN AFFORDBL HSG LND TRST 5101 THIMSEN AVE, #202 MINNETONKA, MN 55345 20-028-24-24-0015 P DOI & L RAMBERG-DOI 5740 XERXES AVE EDINA, MN 55410 20-028-24-31-0001 ALICIA JOHNSON 5800 XERXES AVE EDINA, MN 55410 20-028-24-24-0038 RYAN & JORDEN CAVANAUGH 5740 YORK AVE EDINA, MN 55410 20-028-24-24-0016 DANIEL WURST & APRIL HALVERSON 5741 YORK AVE EDINA, MN 55410 20-028-24-31-0023 JEFFREY & ASHLEY JOHNSON 5800 YORK AVE EDINA, MN 55410 20-028-24-31-0022 MICHELLE WAGENER 5537 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA, MN 55424 20-028-24-24-0070 S E BJELLAND & F REYES 5736 ZENITH AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 20-028-24-24-0039 JANE C HANSEN 5741 ZENITH AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 20-028-24-31-0047 ANDREW ARASHIBA & E ARASHIBA 5800 ZENITH AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 20-028-24-31-0046 BRADLEY KEITH LOHRDING 5801 ZENITH AVE S EDINA, MN 55410 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-456 The Edina City Council will meet at 7 p.m. Tue., Oct. 5, 2021, to approve and adopt the listed special assessments against the described property, which is part of the West 58th Street Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction: Property Identification No. 20-028-24-24-0088 The special assessment to this property for roadway reconstruction is $4,826.65 and the special assessment for utility upgrades is $0. The total amount of the proposed special assessment for the project is $361,129.65. The proposed assessment roll is on file and is available by emailing the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. No invoices will be mailed. This is the only notice you will receive regarding payment. Payment Options The proposed assessment is payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a period of 15 years at the rate of 2.55 percent. Should the City Council adopt the assessment roll at the Oct. 5 meeting, you may pay the assessment in one of these ways: 1. Pay the whole of the assessment without interest payable to the City of Edina and mail check to the Assessing Office, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424 on or before Nov. 19, 2021. 2. Pay a minimum of 25 percent of the assessment payable to the City of Edina and mail check to the Assessing Office, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424 on or before Nov. 19, 2021. The remaining balance will be certified to the County Auditor and your first year’s payment will be payable with your real estate taxes in 2022, with interest on the remaining assessment at the rate of 2.55 percent per annum from Oct. 19, 2021 to Dec. 31, 2022. 3. Pay the assessment with your real estate taxes. If the special assessment is not paid in the Assessing Office by Nov. 19, 2021, it will be certified to the County Auditor and your first year’s payment will be payable with your real estate taxes in 2022, with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 2.55 percent per annum from Oct. 19, 2021 to Dec. 31, 2022. Deferment The City Council may, at its discretion, defer the payment of assessments for a homestead property owned by a person age 65 or older, one retired by virtue of a permanent and total disability, or a member of the National Guard or other reserves ordered to active military service for whom it would be a hardship to make payments. Deferment applications must be filed with the Assessor’s Office by Nov. 15, 2021. Contact Jamie Ericksen at 952-826-0424 or JEricksen@EdinaMN.gov to learn the procedures to apply for deferment and make arrangements to file your application by calling. 2 Below is an example of your annual payment over 15 years (principal plus interest). Payments are amortized using a level annual payment schedule. Sample Total Assessment Sample Annual Payment (Principal + Interest) $4,826.65 $393.70 $9,653.29 $787.40 Objection and/or Appeal to the Assessment 1. If you wish to object to the amount of your assessment, email a signed, written objection to the City Clerk, sallison@EdinaMN.gov, before the assessment public hearing. 2. Per Minn. Stat. § 429.081, you may appeal the amount of your assessment to district court by serving notice of the appeal to the Mayor or the City Clerk within 30 days after the assessment amount is adopted at the assessment public hearing and file the same notice with the district court within 10 days after the notice was served to the Mayor or the City Clerk. Email notice of appeal to the City Clerk at sallison@EdinaMN.gov. To comment on the special assessment, you may: Write to City of Edina, Engineering Department, 7450 Metro Blvd, Edina, MN 55439. Email to mail@EdinaMN.gov, attention City Council and Engineering. Attend the Oct 5th City Council Meeting, watch the public hearing online or on Edina TV and call in to offer comments, leave a voicemail in advance or submit your comments online. Ways to participate are included in this mailing. If you have questions regarding the project, please call the Engineering Department at 952-826-0371. If you have questions about paying your assessment, please call the Assessing Division at 952-826-0365. September 15, 2021 Sharon Allison City Clerk 3 Cut the bottom section and mail in with your payment if paying on or before Nov. 19, 2021: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx PAYMENT PROCEDURE If paying on or before Nov. 19, 2021, please cut and return this stub with your payment. Make check payable to the City of Edina. Mail payment: City of Edina , Assessing Division, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424. PID Impr. No. Pay this total amount by Nov. 19, 2021, to avoid future interest charges. If not paid on or before Nov. 19, 2021, the assessment will be placed on your property taxes at 2.55 percent annual interest rate, spread out over 15 years. 20-028-24-24-0088 BA-456 $4,826.65 Amount Enclosed: Name: LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY Survey Responses 30 January 2019 - 20 September 2021 Project Feedback Form Better Together Edina Project: West 58th Street Reconstruction VISITORS 28 CONTRIBUTORS 17 RESPONSES 17 17 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous 17 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 02, 2021 13:53:09 pm Last Seen:Jul 02, 2021 20:48:21 pm City Meetings Somewhat effective Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective City of Edina Website Somewhat effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates Somewhat effective Door Hanger Notices Somewhat effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded Please select a response.Somewhat effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Pay more attention to preferences of neighborhood groups not answered not answered not answered Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? not answered not answered not answered not answered The landscaping is horrible. Seeding in late October after growing season. Some ineffective reseeding in late May. Watering started weeks after seeding and planting and the spray blew the mulch off of the boulevard plantings. Respondent No:2 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 03, 2021 17:20:26 pm Last Seen:Jul 04, 2021 00:17:28 am City Meetings Effective Mailed Correspondences Effective City of Edina Website Effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Mailed Correspondences Effective Better Together Updates Effective Door Hanger Notices Effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? No Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded Please select a response.Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: I think the communication on the project was pretty good. not answered not answered not answered Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? not answered not answered not answered not answered The only problem with the project, in my mind, is the final step of getting the lawn repaired. It’s really just a bunch of weeds with some grass thrown in. Otherwise, I like the project results and think you look did a good job trying to balance the concerns of all. Respondent No:3 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 03, 2021 17:34:57 pm Last Seen:Jul 04, 2021 00:24:04 am City Meetings Somewhat effective Mailed Correspondences Not at all effective City of Edina Website Effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates Not at all effective Door Hanger Notices Somewhat effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? No Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded Please select a response.N/A Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues Water Shut-off(s)No Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered I believe we received a door hanger notice advising the water would be shut off for the day less than 24 hours before the shut off. More advance notice would have been useful. not answered not answered not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? not answered not answered not answered We were very disappointed in the final design choice. It's inconsistent with 54th St and 60th St. A clearly designated bike bath separate from the pedestrian walkway would have made more sense. The city has done a poor job restoring our yard/lawn after digging it up. Also, the city has not done a good job with the landscaping on the boulevard side. It is inconsistent (some flowers, some grass) and has not been particularly well-maintained. Respondent No:4 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 04, 2021 08:01:41 am Last Seen:Jul 04, 2021 14:55:38 pm City Meetings Not at all effective Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective City of Edina Website Somewhat effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Door Hanger Notices Somewhat effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded Please select a response.Not at all effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered not answered not answered not answered not answered Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? not answered not answered not answered not answered Respondent No:5 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 04, 2021 14:29:45 pm Last Seen:Jul 04, 2021 19:55:51 pm City Meetings Effective Mailed Correspondences Effective City of Edina Website Somewhat effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Mailed Correspondences Effective Better Together Updates Effective Door Hanger Notices Effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? No Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded Please select a response.Very Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: I am dissatisfied with end result. I had no idea that the wall outside of my home would be so massive. Landscaping is still a nightmare. You are NOT done! Crews were good. I have a disabled adult in my home. They made sure I could get in and out of my home with my husband. I also was out there every morning making sure they knew what we needed. That really didn’t register for me giving our circumstances, caring for my husband. They were really good. Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? All good. Absolutely, our biggest issue is landscaping. There was a big step missed between the construction digging and landscaping the yard. Post construction, the corner hill was not brought to a similar state, realizing we lost approximately 6 feet of yard. The Contractor should have put more similar dirt back to create the hill base, then lightly compress it. At that time, it would have been ready for top soil. Corners were cut. Overall, the whole yard along 58th should have been grated to match the original contour of property. Currently, the land is lumpy and will be difficult to mow in future. Grass is spotty and full of weeds ... more to be done in future considering current hot weather conditions. No Watering for now. Its helping to establish street plants, ex Day Lilies. That was unexpected. Thanks. Please hire people to landscaping project who enjoy doing the work. The guy who is out there is ornery and inappropriate. Respondent No:6 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 04, 2021 17:35:12 pm Last Seen:Jul 05, 2021 00:27:57 am City Meetings Not at all effective Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective City of Edina Website Somewhat effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates Somewhat effective Door Hanger Notices Somewhat effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded Please select a response.Somewhat effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues Water Shut-off(s)Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: It was admirable to attempt to get community input but the process was disorganized and it felt that it was merely designed to let residents vent and the city could then decide which voices they believed represented the community. A formal vote or survey would have been more honest. It would have been helpful to have more regular information about time tables and expected dates for work to be done. not answered At times it felt as if we were being told what we wanted to hear rather than what was really going to happen. Honesty is appreciated even if it is not what we want to hear. Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? notices on doors need to be placed more than a few hours before the event or they may be missed, especially if we are entering the house by another entrance. Texts or emails might have been more effective. not answered not answered not answered not answered Respondent No:7 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 05, 2021 06:58:49 am Last Seen:Jul 05, 2021 13:52:44 pm City Meetings Effective Mailed Correspondences Effective City of Edina Website Effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Mailed Correspondences Effective Better Together Updates Very Effective Door Hanger Notices Somewhat effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded Please select a response.Somewhat effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues Water Shut-off(s)Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Better communication to houses on corners and their impact with other projects. It was very difficult to find information specific to our impact and cost across two projecst. Door hangers did not give us enough time. Once the date on the hanger had already passed. See comment about houses on corners. I felt that Chad Milnar did not use much empathy when it came to dealing with residents. For some lots, this was a HUGE impact to their yards. Empathy and compassion are critical to having these conversations. People need to be heard, negotiated with, and then build the trust by doing what you say your are going to do. Plenty of examples of this. After he left the project, the next person did a good job of listening and accommodating residents, yet all that detail did not get handed over to Edinah. We had to rebuild with her again. Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? not answered not answered not answered not answered not answered Respondent No:8 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 05, 2021 14:10:52 pm Last Seen:Jul 05, 2021 21:07:20 pm City Meetings N/A Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective City of Edina Website Somewhat effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates Effective Door Hanger Notices Effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded Please select a response.Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: not answered not answered not answered not answered Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? not answered not answered not answered not answered There are still road work signs, cones, left over misc items on the intersection. In addition, seed was laid to late and did not have time to establish before the heat Respondent No:9 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 05, 2021 15:52:05 pm Last Seen:Jul 05, 2021 22:42:07 pm City Meetings N/A Mailed Correspondences N/A City of Edina Website N/A Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Mailed Correspondences Not at all effective Better Together Updates Not at all effective Door Hanger Notices N/A Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? No Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded Please select a response.Not at all effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: not answered We moved in near the end of February, so we didn’t have a lot of time to receive communication about the project, but I didn’t receive anything via mail regarding work and all of the information I’ve received about the landscaping has been proactively sought on my own. not answered I can’t get any information about when things will take place. The answer is always that it’s on the contractor’s list or the contractor is aware. There has to be a timeline and timeframe for when certain aspects - like weeding and reseeding - will take place. I wish this could be communicated more specifically to residents. Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? not answered Again, the weeding and seeding process has been frustrating, and the lack of clarity on when action will take place is not acceptable. not answered not answered not answered Respondent No:10 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 06, 2021 18:27:54 pm Last Seen:Jul 07, 2021 01:21:05 am City Meetings Somewhat effective Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective City of Edina Website Somewhat effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates Somewhat effective Door Hanger Notices Effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Very Effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded Please select a response.Somewhat effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Communications were not sufficiently parcel specific. Text worked well. Initially did not do a good job of fielding and responding to communications. Communications improved later. not answered not answered Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? not answered Special assessment policy unfairly treats all parcels the same when it should treat differently situated parcels differently. Currently my lawn is full of weeds and the reconstruct has been inadequate wrt lawn restoration. Tree replacement policy is kind and a good policy. not answered Respondent No:11 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 15, 2021 16:43:51 pm Last Seen:Jul 15, 2021 23:32:40 pm City Meetings Not at all effective Mailed Correspondences Not at all effective City of Edina Website Somewhat effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates Not at all effective Door Hanger Notices Somewhat effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Not at all effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? No Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded Please select a response.Not at all effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues Honestly…call us, send an email, drop a letter. Any or all of the above. Same as above - make the effort to reach out to neighbors - residents - because you know it’s the right thing to do - not because it’s something to check off the task list for the day. Call, email, leave a door hanger, text, knock on our doors. There are weeds from the 58th Street project growing in residents’s yards - up and down 58th Street - growing taller each day and no one from the city in sight to deal with them. ? What is the plan? Is funding an issue? This project should not be marked ‘completed’ until the weeds are dealt with and it’s actually completed. There are weeds from the 58th Street project growing in residents’s yards - up and down 58th Street - growing taller each day and no one from the city in sight to deal with them. ? What is the plan? Is funding an issue? This project should not be marked ‘completed’ until the weeds are dealt with and it’s actually completed. Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access No Roadway access No Parking No Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? There are weeds from the 58th Street project growing in residents’s yards - up and down 58th Street - growing taller each day and no one from the city in sight to deal with them. ? What is the plan? Is funding an issue? This project should not be marked ‘completed’ until the weeds are dealt with and it’s actually completed. There are weeds from the 58th Street project growing in residents’s yards - up and down 58th Street - growing taller each day and no one from the city in sight to deal with them. ? What is the plan? Is funding an ? This project should not be marked ‘completed’ until the weeds are dealt with and it’s actually completed. There are weeds from the 58th Street project growing in residents’s yards - up and down 58th Street - growing taller each day and no one from the city in sight to deal with them. ? What is the plan? Is funding an ? This project should not be marked ‘completed’ until the weeds are dealt with and it’s actually completed. not answered There are weeds from the 58th Street project growing in residents’s yards - up and down 58th Street - growing taller each day and no one from the city in sight to deal with them. ? What is the plan? Is funding an ? This project should not be marked ‘completed’ until the weeds are dealt with and it’s actually completed. Respondent No:12 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 17, 2021 09:09:16 am Last Seen:Jul 17, 2021 15:57:50 pm City Meetings Somewhat effective Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective City of Edina Website N/A Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates Somewhat effective Door Hanger Notices Not at all effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded Please select a response.Somewhat effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Neighborhood meetings More mailed correspondence not answered We complained about how the steps from the sidewalk were not put in straight. They came back and redid the steps but they still aren't straight. Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? Meet with each resident to find out what they would like to get the project completed successfully. I don't understand the various heights of the retaining wall that was installed. I don't know why the retaining wall stopped where it it did. not answered Keep after the landscaping company to take care of all the weeds that I see growing. It seems the landscaping company that was employed used young kids as employees. I'm not sure they knew what they were doing. The retaining walls are not straight, there are weeds growing instead of grass. I would have liked to be informed of the location of the retaining wall before it was put in place. Is one set of sidewalks to be used for bicycles and the other side for walking? If so, what indicates this is the case? Respondent No:13 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 19, 2021 22:34:57 pm Last Seen:Jul 20, 2021 05:16:09 am City Meetings Somewhat effective Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective City of Edina Website Somewhat effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates Somewhat effective Door Hanger Notices Somewhat effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Not at all effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? No Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded Please select a response.Somewhat effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Send communications directly to email not answered not answered not answered I honestly don’t remember the notices from last summer. Get a different landscaping company. This one has done a terrible job. Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? not answered not answered 1) The “bike path” is not used by adult bikers; they all use the street. Respondent No:14 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 22, 2021 07:47:34 am Last Seen:Jul 22, 2021 14:44:55 pm City Meetings Somewhat effective Mailed Correspondences Effective City of Edina Website Effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Mailed Correspondences Effective Better Together Updates Effective Door Hanger Notices Effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded Please select a response.N/A Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access No Roadway access No Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: not answered not answered not answered not answered Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? not answered not answered Stop letting the non elected engineering department cram through designs and decisions that tax paying residents do not support. They should work collaboratively with residents and not force residents to circumvent them and work through city council. not answered not answered Respondent No:15 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 27, 2021 19:49:12 pm Last Seen:Jul 28, 2021 02:17:49 am City Meetings Not at all effective Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective City of Edina Website Not at all effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Mailed Correspondences Effective Better Together Updates Not at all effective Door Hanger Notices Somewhat effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? No Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded Please select a response.Not at all effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access No Roadway access No Parking No Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: The mailed correspondence was most effective. It would be more so if it was accurate The City failed miserably in communicating especially with residents that live in the construction zone. State it in a mailed correspondence. Have a more honest and reliable representative from the city communicate. Maybe someone who cares about the home owners? Chad Milner clearly wasn't caring of residents. Derek was much better. Jacob Harrington was the BEST. Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? I was told by the workers themselves. I'm glad I was home. They were thoughtful to knock on my door. Please do not use the cheapest bid. I work in the construction industry and it was obvious that this was a cheaply run project. The workers themselves were by and far great. They worked extremely hard but only could do what they were told to do. I had massive piles of old road, cement and construction debris in my yard for over 2 mos. Mice etc began to build nests because it was there for so long. This is unacceptable. There was a lame attempt at listening to residents. I was obvious that the City had no intention on listening to it's residents. My property was extremely impacted from this project (more so than most) which was acknowledged by Chad Milner. He then followed up that the City couldn't do anything about it and that if they wanted to, they could impact my yard more than they were doing. Also, Hire more people like Jacob Harrington. Actually hire people who care about the residents, what they are going through and who have a little compassion. Jacob has all these qualities. He was really the only person who assisted me in any meaningful way. Please be honest when you plan a project. It became clear that the City had no intention on listening to it's residents. Also, no where was it discussed that a sidewalk would go on both sides of the street. Finally, you should have a follow up assessment done. Right now the street is so narrow that speeding cars feel like they are going mach 10 down W 58th St. I feel that no where was it discussed as an option of directing cars to 60th and bikers/pedestrians directed to W 58th. 60th St is already more appropriate for car traffic. Why wasn't this ever discussed? Also, why were questionnaires sent to people who don't even live in this area? I have a friend who lives on Penn and 59th and why was she filling out a questionnaire on which design option I would have to live with? I also feel that people whose property are impacted by this project should 1. have more say in what happens and shouldn't be left to suffer the cost, mess and fall out of such a horribly run situation. Frankly, my property was significantly negatively impacted... my yard is still in a state of disrepair and now I have a speedway 12 feet from my door! Why didn't anyone think to speak to me personally knowing that this project would impact my property more so than others? I moved to Edina being told how great the City is. Sadly, I haven't experienced this. What happened on the 58th St project would never happen in the Country Hills or Indian Hills areas. Respondent No:16 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 27, 2021 19:57:12 pm Last Seen:Jul 28, 2021 02:47:52 am City Meetings N/A Mailed Correspondences N/A City of Edina Website N/A Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Mailed Correspondences N/A Better Together Updates N/A Door Hanger Notices N/A Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)N/A Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? No Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded Please select a response.N/A Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices not answered New homeowner, didn't receive any communication. Should find way to include new homeowners in comunications Share details of assessments in taxes Again, new homeowner, was not communicated with when work was happening, didn't know that certain plants had been selected, or what after care consisted of Creating an email distribution list you can sign up for to get better notice would be helpful. Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? Take into account how the changes may impact traffic. A stop light was added on 58th and France, which has brought many more cars into the neighborhood driving very fast with lots of small children on the sidewalks. We need more stop signs to make traffic slow down Mulch in the plants was not a great addition. There is mulch all over the sidewalks, and it's a big pain for homeowners to keep the sidewalks clean. Really appreciate the water trucks for plants and grass. We need to take into account how the changes have impacted traffic. A stop light was added on 58th and France, which has brought many more cars into the neighborhood driving very fast with lots of small children on the sidewalks. We need more stop signs to make traffic slow down. In addition, there is next to no grass growing in seeding that was put down, just weeds. We appreciate the watering trucks, but they are just watering weeds. We need additional seeding or turf put down. Respondent No:17 Login:Registered Responded At:Jul 28, 2021 13:19:27 pm Last Seen:Sep 02, 2021 12:39:18 pm City Meetings Somewhat effective Mailed Correspondences Effective City of Edina Website Effective Q1.How effective was the communication you received prior to construction? Q2.Suggestions for improvements to communication prior to construction Mailed Correspondences Somewhat effective Better Together Updates Effective Door Hanger Notices Effective Text Messages (Emergency Notices Only)Effective Q3.How effective was the communication you received during construction? Q4.Suggestions for improvements to communication during construction Q5.Did you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments? Yes Q6.Suggestions for improvement on communicating how projects are funded Please select a response.Very Effective Q7.During construction how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue? Q8.Suggestions for improvements on understanding construction related issues Water Shut-off(s)Yes Driveway access Yes Roadway access Yes Parking Yes Q9.During Construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for: Scheduling conflicts prohibited us from attending the city meetings. Mail correspondence left us with questions. the website became our go to for communication. We relied on flagging down the construction crew or project manager to determine what would be happening at each step. Still not clear on final impact of City funds on our assessment? Solicit feedback from homeowners during the project. Q10.Suggestions for improvements on construction notices Q11.Do you have any other suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Q12.Is there anything related to the project we should stop doing? Q13.Is there anything related to the project we should keep doing? Q14.Do you have any general comments related to the project? Face to face, Email and text messages were most effective for us. Landscaping needs to be addressed. We were told it would be completed more timely than it was. The final product has left us with abundant weeds that now threaten our established weed free lawn. Understand this is being addressed. Find a different landscape company. It appeared they were burdened by the work and lacked enthusiasm/urgency in getting it done. Continue to use Park construction. It's good to see that the amount of standing water and sand at the intersection of 58th and Philbrook Ln has been resolved. Would like to see the street sweeper a little more frequently. The CITYofEDINAFINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING2020 Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Project58thStreetImprovement No. BA-456October 5, 2021 The CITYofEDINALocation Map:www.EdinaMN.gov2Objections5733 Beard Ave Notes: Public Engagement Process, France Ave Traffic Signal, Turf Establishment The CITYofEDINAPost Construction Survey ResultsNumber of RespondentsNeighborhoodResponse RateWest 58thStreet 23% 17 Respondents73 Surveys Sentwww.EdinaMN.gov3 The CITYofEDINAwww.EdinaMN.gov4Response RateYearResponse Rate2014 46%2015 26%2016 29%2017 14%2018 15% 2019 8%2020 23%4 The CITYofEDINAHow effective was the communication you received prior to construction?www.EdinaMN.gov5201820172016201570% 68% 69% 61%79% 82% 81% 70%52% 70% 67% 61%201963%74%63%202046%52%54%40%42%44%46%48%50%52%54%56%Meetings Letters WebsiteWest 58th St The CITYofEDINAHow effective was the communication you received during construction?www.EdinaMN.gov620202019201820172016201552% 70% 75% 76% 77% 61%49% 65% 63% 81% 77% 63%55% 64% 53% 63% 65% 53%62%* 58%* 70% 72% 63% 62%*New in 20190%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%Letters BetterTogetherUpdatesDoor Notices Text MessagesWest 58th St The CITYofEDINADid you understand the project was funded by City Utility Funds in addition to Special Assessments?www.EdinaMN.gov72020*2019*2017201620152014Yes53% 85% 55% 59% 62% 55%No47% 15% 45% 41% 38% 31%*Question reworded in 201944%46%48%50%52%54%West 58th StYesNo The CITYofEDINADuring construction, how effective was the project team in understanding your specific construction related issue?www.EdinaMN.gov8Very effective to Very effective to Very effective to Very effective to SomewhatSomewhatSomewhatSomewhat effectiveeffectiveeffectiveeffective20202019201820172016201551% 66% 69% 75% 74% 59%0%10%20%30%40%50%60%West 58th St The CITYofEDINAwww.EdinaMN.gov9During construction, aside from unexpected conditions such as weather-related delays, did the project team provide you with enough notice for:20202019201820172016Water Shut-off(s)93% 72% 88% 81% 80%Driveway Access73% 62% 73% 81% 85%RoadwayAccess73% 53% 83% 87% 80%Parking 82% 54% 81% 90% 89%0%20%40%60%80%100%Water Shut-off(s)DrivewayAccessRoadwayAccessParkingWest 58th St The CITYofEDINADo you have any suggestions for improvements on construction notices? More advanced notice.Crews were good. More information about time tables and expected dates. Text worked well. Make the effort to reach out. More mailed coorespondence. Find a way to include new homeowners.www.EdinaMN.gov10 The CITYofEDINADo you have any suggestions for improvements to the neighborhood reconstruction process? Landscaping unacceptable. Special assessment unfairly treats all parcels the same. Get a different landscaping company. Please do not use the cheapest bid. Take into account how the changes may impact traffic. www.EdinaMN.gov11 The CITYofEDINAIs there anything related to the project we should stop doing?No. Work collaboratively with residents. Mulch in the plants was a poor decision. Find a different landscape company.www.EdinaMN.gov12 The CITYofEDINAIs there anything related to the project we should keep doing?Watering. Tree replacement policy is kind. Keep after landscaping company to take care of all the weeds. Hire people that care about residents. www.EdinaMN.gov13 The CITYofEDINADo you have any general comments related to the project?Landscaping is horrible. Disappointed in final design choice. Hire people to do landscaping who enjoy doing the work. Seed was laid to late and didn’t establish. The bike path is not used by adult bikers. Be honest when you plan a project. Wish there were more sidewalks. Street sweeper should run more frequently. www.EdinaMN.gov14 The CITYofEDINAAssessment Notes1.France Ave Traffic Signal1.No costs assessed for re-work2.Turf Establishment1.Late fall 2020 planting2.2021 summer drought conditions3.Hired a new contractor to correct situation – minimal work now – most work spring 20224.No costs assessed for re-work3.Future Turf Considerations1.Reviewing Specifications, Contractor Meeting, Qualification based Contractwww.EdinaMN.gov15 The CITYofEDINACosts: BA-456ItemItemItemItemAmountAmountAmountAmountStreet (53%) $ 3,300,000Storm Sewer $ 1,300,000Sanitary $ 320,000Water Main $ 1,140,000PACS $ 178,400www.EdinaMN.gov16CIP Estimate $4,500,000Eng Report $6,110,000Final Contract $6,200,000 The CITYofEDINAAssessment Costs: BA-456Street –Assessable Portion: $361,129.65$9,653.29 per Residential Equivalent Unit ($9,900.00 estimate)2.5% Decreasewww.EdinaMN.gov17 The CITYofEDINARecommendation:CONTINUE PH UNTIL OCT. 11CONSIDER APPROVAL ON OCT. 19RESOLUTION NO. 2021-85IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-456www.EdinaMN.gov18 Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.G. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Alisha McAndrews, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-86: Certification of Delinquent Utilities No. DU-21 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2021-86 authorizing certification of Delinquent Utilities No. DU-21. INTRODUCTION: NO COMMENTS were received during the public hearing. Adopt Resolution No. 2021-86 to certify the delinquent utility accounts for collection with 2022 real estate taxes. See attached Staff Report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution 2021-86: Certification of Delinquent Utilities Staff Report Staff Presentation Certification of Delinquent Utilities List of Delinquent Accounts RESOLUTION NO. 2021-86 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT UTILITY CHARGES TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY AUDITOR WHEREAS, the Edina City Code section 28-52 through section 28-57 allows for the certification of delinquent utility charges (water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and recycling) to the County Auditor for collection pursuant to the provision of MN Statute 444.075. WHEREAS, the Finance Department has prepared a list of delinquent utility charges together with the legal description of the premises served, the official copy of which is on file with the City Clerk and attached to this resolution. WHEREAS, all parties have been notified by mail of the certification. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall transmit a certified duplicate copy of this resolution and the list of delinquent accounts to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax list of the County, and such delinquent accounts shall be collected and paid over the same manner as other municipal taxes with interest from the date of this resolution at the rate of 6.5 percent (6.5%) per annum and including a $35.00 administrative penalty pursuant to the provisions of MN Statute 444.075. The description of the certification is: NAME OF CERTIFICATION INSTALLMENTS Delinquent Utilities DU-20 Levy No. 21104 1 Year Passed and adopted by the City Council on October 19, 2021. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 19, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 City Clerk October 19, 2021 Mayor and City Council Andrea Rich, Assistant Finance Director PUBLIC HEARING: Certification of Delinquent Utilities Charges No. DU-20, Resolution No. 2021-86 Information / Background: Minnesota Statute 444.075 allows Cities to “charge a charge again the owner, lessee, occupant or all of them and may provide and covenant for certifying unpaid charges to the county auditor with taxes against the property served for collection as other taxes are collected”. City of Edina City Code section 28-52 through section 28-57 allow for the certification of water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and recycling delinquent accounts. The City of Edina has certified unpaid utility bills to the county for collections for many years. Hennepin County requires council resolution prior to certification. Utility accounts with balances over $50 and delinquent one month or longer were notified in writing of the pending certification and the time and date of the hearing in a letter dated September 14, 2021. Customers who have not paid by October 19, 2021 will be charged a $35 administrative fee to cover the additional costs associated with the certification process. Customers will continue to have the opportunity to pay their overdue balances through November 19, 2021. After November 19, payments for the certified portion of customer bills are no longer accepted by the City and certification balances as of the end of business that day are certified to Hennepin County. Delinquent utility amounts certified to Hennepin County will also include an interest rate of 6.5%, per City policy. As of September 14, 2021, 756 properties were sent notices for a total of $518,279. In 2020, the final certification included 372 properties for a total of $275,490. The delinquent utility list attached includes those properties that remain on the 2021 certification list as of Tuesday, October 12, 2021. There are a total of 426 properties with a delinquent amount of $340,560 on this list. Staff expects the final total certified to the County on November 20 will be less. To respect the privacy of delinquent customers, the attached list omits the names of property owners. The CITYofEDINACertification of Delinquent Utility BillsOctober 19, 2021 The CITYofEDINAUtility Certification Process•Utility accounts with balances over $50 and delinquent 30 days or longer were notified in writing of the pending certification and the date of this hearing.•A $35.00 administrative fee will be added to delinquent accounts after October 19th.•Customers will continue to have the opportunity to pay the overdue balances until November 19th.www.EdinaMN.gov2 The CITYofEDINAUtility Certification Process•The delinquent list will be attached to resolution 2021-86 (at the October 19thCity Council meeting) and sent to the County for certification.•Certified amounts will pay an interest rate of 6.5%.•All are one year assessments.www.EdinaMN.gov3 The CITYofEDINAUtility Certification Historywww.EdinaMN.gov4201620172018201920202021Sept. Notices# Properties787 1,031 731 1,092 1,222 756 $ Amount$ 407,090 $ 453,930 $ 354,047 $ 542,875 $ 635,945 $ 518,279 Oct. Public Hearing# Properties464 428 542 519 432 602 $ Amount$ 291,457 $ 281,104 $ 296,593 $ 331,706 $ 302,528 $ 441,981 Nov. Certification# Properties329 288 334 332 372 426 *$ Amount$ 227,354 $ 225,131 $ 231,122 $ 251,670 $ 275,490 $ 340,560 *City will continue to take payment through 11/19 The CITYofEDINAUtility Certification Actions•Public Hearing was held October 5th•Staff recommends adoption of Resolution 2021-86 certifying this year’s delinquent utility bills to the County Auditor for collection with the 2022 property taxes.www.EdinaMN.gov5 Customer #Account #Service Address Town/City Account Status Collection Status Certification Balance 00077510 0113400016 7401 YORK AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 27,316.26$ 00126326 0170000056 7725 WASHINGTON AVE EDINA Active First Notice 9,630.69$ 00106478 0343508001 7017 AMUNDSON AVE EDINA Active First Notice 9,055.06$ 00077361 0343509000 7070 AMUNDSON AVE EDINA Active First Notice 6,931.94$ 00089896 0343511015 7100 AMUNDSON AVE EDINA Active First Notice 5,392.83$ 00120751 0160523000 5701 PARKWOOD LN EDINA Active First Notice 5,084.96$ 00125065 0350017019 7711 COMPUTER AVE EDINA Active First Notice 4,597.49$ 00077969 0120576000 6005 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA Active First Notice 4,000.31$ 00108561 0331013004 6813 CRESTON RD EDINA Active First Notice 3,704.58$ 00126337 0170000065 7777 WASHINGTON AVE EDINA Active First Notice 3,400.98$ 00100631 0335022415 7561 FRANCE AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 3,066.08$ 00089894 0343507002 7001 CAHILL RD EDINA Active First Notice 2,697.40$ 00122953 0158008008 7201 SHANNON DR EDINA Active First Notice 2,689.85$ 00100631 0335022406 7561 FRANCE AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 2,387.07$ 00121323 0331737214 7321 GLOUCHESTER DR EDINA Active First Notice 2,363.32$ 00099160 0110851007 5701 ABBOTT AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 2,362.30$ 00101466 0165016307 6731 APACHE RD EDINA Active First Notice 2,213.96$ 00125973 0120699002 6016 CONCORD AVE EDINA Active First Notice 2,133.61$ 00126179 0113306002 3650 HAZELTON RD EDINA Active First Notice 2,043.38$ 00114443 0330935001 6841 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA Active First Notice 1,927.49$ 00104694 0120894005 6121 PARNELL AVE EDINA Active First Notice 1,900.76$ 00089788 0342729006 5804 AMY DR EDINA Active First Notice 1,728.55$ 00086576 0330132002 6223 HALIFAX AVE EDINA Active First Notice 1,713.11$ 00120682 0200702007 4928 SUNNYSLOPE RD E EDINA Active First Notice 1,712.01$ 00080091 0160561450 5401 MALIBU DR EDINA Active First Notice 1,622.04$ 00095924 0340336005 5324 62ND ST W EDINA Active First Notice 1,605.59$ 00103822 0158054001 5920 DEWEY HILL RD EDINA Active First Notice 1,581.97$ 00077151 0163227003 6433 MARGARETS LN EDINA Active First Notice 1,573.25$ 00123002 0332249008 4405 ELLSWORTH DR EDINA Active First Notice 1,564.66$ 00095391 0153718000 6212 BRAEBURN CIR EDINA Active First Notice 1,556.82$ 00122749 0200447007 4622 MOORLAND AVE EDINA Active First Notice 1,513.71$ 00108871 0340144007 6000 TINGDALE AVE EDINA Active First Notice 1,510.48$ 00100517 0202139006 4532 56TH ST W EDINA Active First Notice 1,486.09$ 00081394 0167007000 6921 MCCAULEY TRL S EDINA Active First Notice 1,457.74$ 00124791 0110899001 5908 ZENITH AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 1,452.48$ 00097848 0202992002 5300 HOLLYWOOD RD EDINA Active First Notice 1,438.29$ 00120735 0203517024 5433 VERNON AVE EDINA Active First Notice 1,421.06$ 00090021 0345070120 7713 GLASGOW DR EDINA Active First Notice 1,419.20$ 00092776 0332175006 4405 CLAREMORE DR EDINA Active First Notice 1,355.73$ 00113658 0340840004 6312 MILDRED AVE EDINA Active First Notice 1,323.37$ 00114550 0341803016 5825 GROVE ST EDINA Active First Notice 1,318.96$ 00107387 0203761009 5208 WINDSOR AVE EDINA Active First Notice 1,317.13$ 00111752 0111860004 6221 EWING AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 1,289.81$ 00114639 0110559002 6000 CHOWEN AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 1,278.88$ 00085857 0305587004 414 VAN BUREN AVE EDINA Active First Notice 1,276.91$ 00127036 0160637003 6604 PARKWOOD RD EDINA Active First Notice 1,272.43$ 00118780 0331084008 6641 SOUTHCREST DR EDINA Active First Notice 1,266.30$ 00093250 0160525008 5709 PARKWOOD LN EDINA Active First Notice 1,241.79$ 00126403 0111157006 6000 XERXES AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 1,238.67$ 00121631 0200362008 4608 WOODDALE AVE EDINA Active First Notice 1,237.44$ 00113127 0202224002 4601 WOODLAND RD W EDINA Active First Notice 1,233.32$ Customer #Account #Service Address Town/City Account Status Collection Status Certification Balance 00118339 0120609010 5832 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA Active First Notice 1,232.68$ 00080463 0160841005 6020 VIEW LN EDINA Active First Notice 1,213.50$ 00117703 0341982000 5320 MADDOX LN EDINA Active First Notice 1,213.46$ 00105815 0153417004 5609 MCGUIRE RD EDINA Active First Notice 1,213.24$ 00115847 0305498002 6601 BELMORE LN EDINA Active First Notice 1,204.09$ 00077214 0111655003 6120 YORK AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 1,188.07$ 00118975 0203332009 5032 BEDFORD AVE EDINA Active First Notice 1,177.79$ 00126373 0162552037 6313 POST LN EDINA Active First Notice 1,172.55$ 00121277 0202767014 5227 BROOKSIDE CT EDINA Finalled First Notice 1,172.40$ 00122922 0111771011 6212 EWING AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 1,171.98$ 00098604 0343044002 6100 SHERMAN CIR EDINA Active First Notice 1,141.49$ 00097114 0200559001 4218 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA Active First Notice 1,133.95$ 00117543 0120667000 5825 CONCORD AVE EDINA Active First Notice 1,114.54$ 00085464 0304913002 5516 DUNDEE RD EDINA Active First Notice 1,074.86$ 00107000 0110180009 6111 HALIFAX AVE EDINA Active First Notice 1,057.69$ 00120940 0110187002 6013 HALIFAX AVE EDINA Active First Notice 1,055.17$ 00084753 0290601000 4009 LYNN AVE EDINA Active First Notice 1,049.53$ 00085339 0341319004 5125 DUGGAN PLAZA EDINA Active First Notice 1,041.63$ 00126896 0203769001 5109 WINDSOR AVE EDINA Active No Collection Activity 1,033.66$ 00124940 0331027008 6908 CRESTON RD EDINA Active First Notice 1,032.40$ 00088700 0341134007 5232 DUGGAN PLAZA EDINA Active First Notice 1,023.06$ 00084030 0203795009 5032 KENT AVE EDINA Active First Notice 1,021.57$ MPLS MPLS 6132 XERXES AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 1,020.98$ 00124306 0307512000 5752 DUNCAN LN EDINA Active First Notice 1,019.51$ 00124386 0120487008 5929 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA Active First Notice 1,019.35$ 00076349 0110537009 5728 CHOWEN AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 1,018.99$ 00102384 0340529002 6513 WILRYAN AVE EDINA Active First Notice 1,015.89$ 00114134 0304164008 5616 DALE AVE EDINA Active First Notice 1,015.37$ 00100760 0332729007 4820 ASPASIA LN EDINA Active First Notice 1,004.07$ 00125329 0110301003 6113 FRANCE AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 999.73$ 00099401 0304013001 5825 EASTVIEW DR EDINA Active First Notice 998.78$ 00124724 0110083007 95 WOODLAND CIR EDINA Active No Collection Activity 995.79$ 00102908 0160862900 6012 KILLARNEY LN EDINA Active First Notice 995.60$ 00093431 0165040003 6717 SAMUEL RD EDINA Active First Notice 970.61$ 00113025 0152653009 5509 HILLSIDE CT EDINA Active First Notice 969.62$ 00078149 0120774000 6305 VIRGINIA AVE EDINA Active First Notice 965.62$ 00119440 0203839007 5228 56TH ST W EDINA Active First Notice 956.98$ 00112624 0290182089 4238 FRANCE AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 951.78$ 00109667 0120714003 6213 CONCORD AVE EDINA Active First Notice 947.13$ 00106180 0202281002 4733 SCHOOL RD EDINA Active First Notice 946.51$ 00115818 0160560013 4950 MALIBU DR EDINA Active First Notice 944.07$ 00076717 0110924019 6109 ZENITH AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 943.24$ 00097537 0111424003 5429 HALIFAX LN EDINA Active First Notice 938.31$ 00118021 0201270007 14 WOODLAND RD EDINA Active First Notice 930.72$ 00110428 0290385002 4246 LYNN AVE EDINA Active First Notice 928.84$ 00096924 0153788005 6937 MARK TERRACE CIR EDINA Active First Notice 928.52$ 00113192 0200658001 4836 SUNNYSLOPE RD W EDINA Active First Notice 926.76$ 00116555 0340884001 6355 WARREN AVE EDINA Active First Notice 919.44$ 00091856 0331262002 4740 70TH ST W EDINA Active First Notice 918.12$ 00078298 0121025005 6332 RYAN AVE EDINA Active First Notice 916.01$ 00123312 0341356008 5117 TIFTON DR EDINA Active First Notice 914.20$ Customer #Account #Service Address Town/City Account Status Collection Status Certification Balance 00125266 0342551045 6338 RED FOX LN EDINA Active First Notice 912.16$ 00104202 0340521000 6429 WILRYAN AVE EDINA Active First Notice 908.18$ 00084768 0305826005 409 WASHINGTON AVE EDINA Active First Notice 902.17$ 00115273 0342550144 6200 SANDPIPER CT EDINA Active First Notice 893.45$ 00106154 0159091068 7703 TANGLEWOOD CT EDINA Active First Notice 891.82$ 00112964 0201441001 5016 ARDEN AVE EDINA Active First Notice 889.20$ 00118399 0340129006 5008 CLOVER RIDGE EDINA Active First Notice 875.44$ 00113430 0153465005 5708 70TH ST W EDINA Active First Notice 874.99$ 00116024 0167001015 7023 MCCAULEY TRL EDINA Active First Notice 872.00$ 00113167 0200119004 4521 BRUCE AVE EDINA Active First Notice 871.78$ 00120397 0160647387 6617 BISCAYNE BLVD EDINA Active First Notice 867.42$ 00121547 0157923280 5555 VILLAGE DR EDINA Active First Notice 863.55$ 00087613 0332131009 4509 ANDOVER RD EDINA Active First Notice 863.30$ 00121139 0340248002 5308 61ST ST W EDINA Active First Notice 858.70$ 00076480 0110682002 5917 BEARD AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 856.31$ 00114448 0330711001 6949 SOUTHDALE RD EDINA Active First Notice 853.68$ 00109278 0157508041 7112 FLEETWOOD DR EDINA Active First Notice 850.47$ 00126171 0152727001 6716 GALWAY DR EDINA Active First Notice 848.19$ 00094241 0304233005 5117 BENTON AVE EDINA Active First Notice 845.41$ 00121552 0341687008 5604 WARDEN AVE EDINA Finalled First Notice 836.57$ 00083971 0203727002 5400 RICHMOND LN EDINA Active First Notice 835.42$ 00118905 0342666001 5348 WHITING AVE EDINA Active First Notice 834.42$ 00103030 0120447007 5944 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA Active First Notice 832.92$ SLP SLP 4390 COOLIDGE AVE EDINA Active NA 832.61$ 00106012 0152640005 5616 HILLSIDE CT EDINA Active First Notice 829.64$ 00119738 0304175005 5809 HANSEN RD EDINA Active First Notice 826.30$ 00112763 0110363008 5912 EWING AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 825.00$ 00125771 0120226004 6112 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA Active First Notice 824.99$ 00106841 0305354014 6216 BELMORE LN EDINA Active First Notice 823.43$ 00080650 0161237005 6024 WALNUT DR EDINA Active First Notice 819.29$ 00119753 0341171001 5237 MEADOW RIDGE EDINA Active First Notice 815.45$ 00126443 0153729007 7104 GLEASON RD EDINA Active First Notice 814.30$ 00118485 0340857004 5221 62ND ST W EDINA Active First Notice 814.09$ 00076795 0111016007 5840 YORK AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 813.88$ 00082436 0201061000 5236 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA Active First Notice 813.16$ 00123606 0120200004 5900 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA Active First Notice 805.92$ 00078153 0120827007 6508 WEST SHORE DR EDINA Active No Collection Activity 802.64$ 00082554 0201173005 7 WOODLAND RD EDINA Active First Notice 800.00$ 00122773 0160328007 6624 LONDONDERRY DR EDINA Active First Notice 793.15$ 00097697 0111635008 6105 YORK AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 791.51$ 00097995 0305529005 312 HARRISON AVE EDINA Active First Notice 787.39$ 00093017 0203245005 5129 WILLIAM AVE EDINA Active First Notice 786.23$ 00124439 0158044004 7302 CLAREDON DR EDINA Active First Notice 785.55$ 00114525 0202281039 4721 SCHOOL RD EDINA Active First Notice 784.76$ 00120898 0340555009 6400 WILRYAN AVE EDINA Active First Notice 783.42$ 00093615 0305398003 404 BLAKE RD S EDINA Active First Notice 782.39$ 00109717 0160551005 5600 PARKWOOD LN EDINA Finalled First Notice 777.69$ 00083324 0202368008 4902 LAKEVIEW DR EDINA Active First Notice 777.03$ SLP SLP 4380 COOLIDGE AVE EDINA Active NA 775.12$ 00111190 0305533009 322 HARRISON AVE EDINA Active First Notice 774.12$ 00109797 0111001004 3201 60TH ST W EDINA Active First Notice 771.58$ Customer #Account #Service Address Town/City Account Status Collection Status Certification Balance 00123646 0305684006 425 MADISON AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 768.83$ 00121192 0201562004 3913 48TH ST W EDINA Active First Notice 766.18$ 00112321 0121097017 6528 SHERWOOD RD EDINA Active First Notice 761.09$ 00101939 0110252002 6024 FRANCE AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 760.77$ 00089482 0342354008 5817 TRACY AVE EDINA Active First Notice 757.72$ 00104926 0158980108 7736 PONDWOOD DR EDINA Active First Notice 750.81$ 00102003 0342227012 5912 CRESCENT DR EDINA Active First Notice 749.69$ 00087962 0332774001 4900 HIBISCUS AVE EDINA Active First Notice 747.77$ 00116689 0305699009 315 MADISON AVE EDINA Active First Notice 745.71$ 00122679 0162558068 6414 MCCAULEY CIR EDINA Active First Notice 737.96$ 00088832 0341348018 5124 TIFTON DR EDINA Active First Notice 735.89$ 00121206 0203325008 5321 INTERLACHEN BLVD EDINA Active First Notice 735.27$ 00123317 0330320004 6300 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA Active First Notice 735.25$ 00119301 0111411008 5440 FRANCE AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 734.19$ 00107926 0305532000 320 HARRISON AVE EDINA Active First Notice 733.18$ 00102496 0306572009 5224 EVANSWOOD LN EDINA Active First Notice 730.30$ 00123993 0110685009 5905 BEARD AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 726.50$ 00080953 0162558102 6447 MCCAULEY TER EDINA Active First Notice 723.74$ 00079204 0153767000 6913 GLEASON CIR EDINA Active First Notice 723.74$ 00126747 0203458007 5224 INTERLACHEN BLVD EDINA Active First Notice 723.29$ 00117670 0203283008 5128 WILLIAM AVE EDINA Active First Notice 700.46$ 00085966 0305729003 425 JEFFERSON AVE EDINA Active First Notice 700.25$ 00088895 0341418004 5108 70TH ST W EDINA Active First Notice 700.25$ 00088301 0340345004 5224 62ND ST W EDINA Active First Notice 700.25$ 00093057 0330761000 6901 DAWSON LN EDINA Active First Notice 700.25$ 00119670 0342218004 5412 BENTON AVE EDINA Active First Notice 692.67$ 00105016 0202846028 5101 49TH ST W EDINA Active First Notice 686.28$ 00104429 0200651008 5200 WILLSON RD EDINA Active First Notice 685.91$ 00125840 0110694008 5817 BEARD AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 684.85$ 00121910 0331737296 7326 CORNELIA DR EDINA Active First Notice 674.72$ 00117193 0290617002 4113 MONTEREY AVE EDINA Active First Notice 672.99$ 00126618 0202766033 4501 BROOKSIDE TER EDINA Active First Notice 672.56$ 00120783 0120237001 6129 KELLOGG AVE EDINA Active First Notice 666.61$ 00121279 0332735009 4805 ASPASIA LN EDINA Active First Notice 666.31$ 00126554 0110020058 5621 WOODCREST DR EDINA Active First Notice 664.81$ 00125620 0200518001 4805 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA Active No Collection Activity 663.44$ 00122335 0201344009 5320 KELLOGG AVE EDINA Active First Notice 651.64$ 00123438 0201518009 4708 TOWNES RD EDINA Active First Notice 646.99$ 00104014 0305519007 311 HARRISON AVE EDINA Active First Notice 641.53$ 00123718 0120351001 5909 WOODDALE AVE EDINA Active First Notice 640.49$ 00125277 0111419000 5521 HALIFAX LN EDINA Active First Notice 635.10$ 00103040 0202535006 5120 44TH ST W EDINA Active First Notice 626.54$ 00099690 0110223008 3909 GRIMES LN EDINA Active First Notice 622.13$ 00099553 0111388007 3713 54TH ST W EDINA Active First Notice 610.31$ 00108238 0340735002 6400 ROLF AVE EDINA Active First Notice 599.63$ 00121577 0160562011 5501 MALIBU DR EDINA Active First Notice 599.53$ 00118677 0203542005 5240 EDENMOOR ST EDINA Active First Notice 596.87$ 00110566 0340204004 6116 BIRCHCREST DR EDINA Active First Notice 591.08$ 00121337 0160855017 5903 KILLARNEY LN EDINA Active First Notice 590.98$ 00126805 0120414006 5841 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA Finalled No Collection Activity 586.68$ 00121982 0200922010 5336 HALIFAX AVE EDINA Active First Notice 578.98$ Customer #Account #Service Address Town/City Account Status Collection Status Certification Balance 00126696 0120145002 6133 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA Active First Notice 571.31$ 00122170 0340474016 6332 JOSEPHINE AVE EDINA Active First Notice 562.91$ 00077188 0111622003 6132 XERXES AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 562.18$ 00122758 0110218005 5913 GRIMES AVE EDINA Active First Notice 559.49$ 00127208 0290156009 4209 MORNINGSIDE RD EDINA Active First Notice 557.54$ 00126673 0304860005 5308 DUNDEE RD EDINA Active First Notice 554.27$ 00081098 0163413007 6600 MOHAWK TRL EDINA Active First Notice 543.43$ 00124874 0290523005 4208 OAKDALE AVE EDINA Active No Collection Activity 539.62$ 00126818 0341185005 5204 MEADOW RIDGE EDINA Active First Notice 534.47$ 00077970 0120577009 6001 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA Active First Notice 532.42$ 00087948 0332761006 4909 TRILLIUM LN EDINA Active First Notice 531.99$ 00106980 0203733004 5025 RICHMOND DR EDINA Active First Notice 531.29$ 00126763 0110835008 5829 ABBOTT AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 512.56$ 00117117 0290379000 4234 LYNN AVE EDINA Active First Notice 511.71$ 00116267 0305025022 29 CIRCLE WEST EDINA Active First Notice 505.93$ 00127176 0160562583 5045 PARK TER EDINA Active First Notice 503.14$ 00125852 0341946005 6112 HANSEN RD EDINA Active First Notice 501.67$ 00114195 0340772006 6305 MILDRED AVE EDINA Active First Notice 494.55$ 00115809 0200937004 5220 HALIFAX AVE EDINA Active First Notice 491.54$ 00124270 0202297004 4812 SCHOOL RD EDINA Active First Notice 489.73$ 00120936 0202070007 4509 LAKEVIEW DR EDINA Active First Notice 489.22$ 00081730 0111862002 6213 EWING AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 478.02$ 00112127 0340864005 5220 MADDOX LN EDINA Active First Notice 472.90$ 00126410 0202249003 5713 CONCORD AVE EDINA Active First Notice 471.87$ 00087647 0332166007 4441 CLAREMORE DR EDINA Active First Notice 470.64$ 00127028 0290490004 4400 CURVE AVE EDINA Active First Notice 468.00$ SLP SLP 4002 MONTEREY AVE S EDINA Active NA 463.27$ 00127077 0110577000 6017 CHOWEN AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 458.67$ 00126656 0111207006 5544 XERXES AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 456.05$ 00122277 0340692003 6353 ROLF AVE EDINA Active First Notice 455.84$ 00115088 0160755018 5718 BLAKE RD S EDINA Active First Notice 455.07$ 00124890 0163613005 6212 ST ALBANS CIR EDINA Active No Collection Activity 451.04$ 00122838 0305024005 20 CIRCLE WEST EDINA Active First Notice 448.21$ 00126986 0304577009 5320 AYRSHIRE BLVD EDINA Active First Notice 447.95$ 00125207 0113668004 7400 XERXES AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 446.78$ 00109954 0160324001 6608 LONDONDERRY DR EDINA Active First Notice 446.69$ 00123728 0158980000 7604 DELANEY BLVD EDINA Active First Notice 445.62$ 00111902 0305742006 317 JEFFERSON AVE EDINA Active First Notice 442.80$ 00084608 0290463007 4003 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA Active First Notice 442.79$ 00119629 0111026005 5800 YORK AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 440.09$ 00127238 0202065004 4607 LAKEVIEW DR EDINA Active First Notice 432.11$ 00123332 0202153007 4519 56TH ST W EDINA Active First Notice 431.94$ 00123501 0112940007 6729 YORK AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 429.46$ 00125730 0153733001 6212 LOCH MOOR DR EDINA Active First Notice 420.00$ 00125947 0306422001 6009 PINE GROVE RD EDINA Active No Collection Activity 418.77$ 00127046 0120638006 6116 ASHCROFT AVE EDINA Active First Notice 418.77$ 00126729 0304281006 5904 BERNARD PL EDINA Active First Notice 415.93$ 00119144 0200839003 4940 FRANCE AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 414.08$ 00095153 0110230009 5801 HALIFAX AVE EDINA Active First Notice 410.41$ 00110357 0201318001 5608 KELLOGG AVE EDINA Active First Notice 408.58$ 00082315 0200929004 5308 HALIFAX AVE EDINA Active First Notice 407.91$ Customer #Account #Service Address Town/City Account Status Collection Status Certification Balance 00094972 0111002003 3205 60TH ST W EDINA Active First Notice 407.53$ 00077944 0120551009 6201 ASHCROFT LN EDINA Active First Notice 401.36$ 00123268 0200719008 4901 SUNNYSLOPE RD E EDINA Active First Notice 400.00$ 00112116 0153071001 5617 68TH ST W EDINA Active First Notice 385.44$ 00124087 0201101002 5525 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA Active No Collection Activity 384.13$ 00076276 0110445000 5836 DREW AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 382.74$ 00126704 0110936006 5917 ZENITH AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 378.78$ 00118796 0166010016 7145 VALLEY VIEW RD EDINA Active First Notice 377.49$ 00077339 0112051001 6400 XERXES AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 377.45$ RCHFLD RCHFLD 7400 XERXES AVE S EDINA NA NA 375.52$ 00083777 0203325035 5333 INTERLACHEN BLVD EDINA Active First Notice 374.41$ 00116024 0167001006 7021 MCCAULEY TRL EDINA Active First Notice 374.35$ 00082900 0201545006 3922 49TH ST W EDINA Active First Notice 369.25$ 00120847 0203292007 5217 GRANDVIEW LN EDINA Active First Notice 368.79$ 00084975 0304161001 5609 DALE AVE EDINA Active First Notice 366.08$ 00117461 0120905002 6317 PARNELL AVE EDINA Active First Notice 365.95$ 00078189 0120865000 4808 60TH ST W EDINA Active First Notice 362.05$ SLP SLP 4401 44TH ST W EDINA Active NA 361.97$ 00085220 0304558002 5253 LOCHLOY DR EDINA Active First Notice 361.20$ 00124072 0153513007 5900 CHAPEL DR EDINA Active First Notice 360.43$ 00121854 0340372000 5104 62ND ST W EDINA Active First Notice 359.51$ 00126828 0110946004 5825 ZENITH AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 357.68$ 00077907 0202309000 5606 CONCORD AVE EDINA Active First Notice 357.35$ 00125022 0290556005 4012 INGLEWOOD AVE EDINA Active First Notice 352.00$ 00113238 0201175003 10 WOODLAND RD EDINA Active First Notice 350.27$ 00115854 0200394000 4504 EDINA BLVD EDINA Active First Notice 345.78$ 00122311 0290629008 4006 LYNN AVE EDINA Active First Notice 342.09$ 00112862 0203805007 5029 KENT AVE EDINA Active First Notice 338.27$ 00094625 0203897006 5033 NORMANDALE CT EDINA Active First Notice 336.54$ 00122343 0200666001 4804 SUNNYSLOPE RD W EDINA Active First Notice 335.07$ 00122769 0160648126 6419 STAUDER CIR EDINA Active First Notice 333.12$ 00127527 0290200005 4224 SCOTT TER EDINA Active No Collection Activity 328.93$ 00125757 0202043001 4501 GOLF TER EDINA Active No Collection Activity 326.28$ 00127486 0200380006 4603 EDINA BLVD EDINA Active No Collection Activity 326.00$ 00123142 0159090176 5840 LONG BRAKE TRL EDINA Active First Notice 317.82$ SLP SLP 4905 44TH ST W EDINA Active NA 316.31$ 00112960 0200776008 7 BRIDGE LN EDINA Active First Notice 312.73$ 00101971 0157515015 7011 LEE VALLEY CIR EDINA Active First Notice 309.30$ 00115091 0201156006 5420 PARK PL EDINA Active First Notice 309.14$ 00122850 0153752267 6998 TUPA DR EDINA Active First Notice 308.79$ 00122494 0167003013 7015 MCCAULEY TRL EDINA Active First Notice 299.72$ 00123767 0200654005 4912 SUNNYSLOPE RD W EDINA Active First Notice 298.69$ 00107876 0290012003 4306 BRANSON ST EDINA Active First Notice 288.50$ 00083988 0203750002 5036 WINDSOR AVE EDINA Active First Notice 288.07$ 00076926 0111196009 5628 XERXES AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 287.90$ 00127112 0342765001 5808 OLINGER RD EDINA Active No Collection Activity 287.13$ 00112473 0299029005 4351 BROOKSIDE AVE EDINA Active First Notice 279.56$ 00094198 0201475019 4630 FRANCE AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 279.56$ 00122891 0290514000 4401 LITTEL ST EDINA Active First Notice 279.33$ 00122522 0200295000 4602 DREXEL AVE EDINA Active First Notice 277.40$ 00124351 0110020147 5657 WOODCREST DR EDINA Active No Collection Activity 277.29$ Customer #Account #Service Address Town/City Account Status Collection Status Certification Balance 00082453 0201080007 5331 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA Active First Notice 269.69$ 00117999 0110794007 6028 ABBOTT AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 269.17$ 00127272 0111015008 5844 YORK AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 265.07$ 00126385 0110072000 5708 WOODLAND LN EDINA Active First Notice 258.13$ 00125807 0111319001 3604 55TH ST W EDINA Active No Collection Activity 254.74$ 00097824 0341213001 5161 DANENS DR EDINA Active First Notice 252.03$ 00122237 0120250003 6021 KELLOGG AVE EDINA Active First Notice 251.21$ 00117552 0332503009 4805 70TH ST W EDINA Active First Notice 248.73$ 00125122 0290141007 4405 MORNINGSIDE RD EDINA Active No Collection Activity 246.81$ 00122854 0331737205 7319 GLOUCHESTER DR EDINA Active First Notice 243.97$ 00083385 0202683006 4436 VANDERVORK AVE EDINA Active First Notice 243.93$ 00122175 0342743008 5905 AMY DR EDINA Active First Notice 240.70$ 00126742 0120421007 5813 FAIRFAX AVE EDINA Active No Collection Activity 240.31$ 00124664 0160855008 5901 KILLARNEY LN EDINA Active First Notice 240.31$ 00126626 0342068014 6121 RIDGEWAY RD EDINA Active First Notice 238.64$ 00126707 0110782001 5928 ABBOTT AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 237.21$ 00127301 0202132003 4620 56TH ST W EDINA Active First Notice 236.35$ 00112050 0202780008 5004 MOORE AVE EDINA Active First Notice 233.61$ 00120547 0162435003 6029 KAYMAR DR EDINA Active First Notice 230.00$ 00097822 0332167006 4437 CLAREMORE DR EDINA Active First Notice 229.48$ 00125741 0342639005 5345 WHITING AVE EDINA Active First Notice 227.71$ 00123818 0153079003 6804 HILLSIDE LN EDINA Active First Notice 227.71$ 00113865 0202320005 5609 ST ANDREWS AVE EDINA Active First Notice 226.77$ 00120361 0120386000 5940 WOODDALE AVE EDINA Active First Notice 225.56$ 00120523 0200842008 4924 FRANCE AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 223.37$ 00085695 0305387006 321 BLAKE RD S EDINA Active First Notice 223.36$ 00115929 0157506007 7020 LANHAM LN EDINA Active First Notice 223.18$ 00123314 0203248002 5117 WILLIAM AVE EDINA Active No Collection Activity 222.51$ 00103433 0203767003 5117 WINDSOR AVE EDINA Active First Notice 222.51$ 00122865 0304627009 5508 MERRITT CIR EDINA Active First Notice 222.29$ 00103623 0191000454 7620 XERXES AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 221.75$ 00122189 0152707005 6700 HILLSIDE LN EDINA Active First Notice 221.41$ 00119484 0203375016 5131 OXFORD AVE EDINA Active First Notice 220.43$ 00117488 0305822009 417 WASHINGTON AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 216.88$ 00124918 0201549011 3942 49TH ST W EDINA Finalled No Collection Activity 212.99$ 00116091 0201130007 5433 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA Active First Notice 212.19$ 00125017 0153528000 6008 ERIN TER EDINA Active First Notice 210.00$ 00113204 0330087016 6232 FRANCE AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 209.70$ 00121956 0202786002 4602 CASCADE LN EDINA Active First Notice 207.03$ 00083474 0202825005 5104 MILLPOND PL EDINA Active First Notice 207.03$ 00078353 0121218002 6329 ASHCROFT LN EDINA Active First Notice 204.28$ SLP SLP 4805 44TH ST W EDINA Active NA 203.58$ 00127090 0330923005 6809 POINT DR EDINA Active First Notice 202.29$ 00127296 0201663002 5313 MINNEHAHA BLVD EDINA Active First Notice 201.91$ 00096219 0305016005 4 SPUR RD EDINA Active First Notice 201.57$ 00110578 0341140009 5208 DUGGAN PLAZA EDINA Active First Notice 201.57$ 00111014 0290174007 4217 SCOTT TER EDINA Active First Notice 201.51$ 00107155 0201523002 4812 TOWNES RD EDINA Active First Notice 200.13$ 00126264 0203284007 5132 WILLIAM AVE EDINA Active No Collection Activity 199.29$ 00104735 0305700006 313 MADISON AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 196.15$ 00094030 0306178007 4909 PRESCOTT CIR EDINA Active First Notice 196.15$ Customer #Account #Service Address Town/City Account Status Collection Status Certification Balance 00096921 0152701001 6721 HILLSIDE LN EDINA Active First Notice 196.15$ 00119484 0203375007 5129 OXFORD AVE EDINA Active First Notice 196.01$ 00105775 0341208008 5141 DANENS DR EDINA Active First Notice 194.58$ 00127008 0202258001 5721 ST JOHNS AVE EDINA Active First Notice 192.51$ 00126458 0120322007 4425 VALLEY VIEW RD EDINA Active First Notice 191.98$ 00095909 0151709167 6627 LIMERICK DR EDINA Active First Notice 191.03$ 00125378 0110583002 5929 CHOWEN AVE S EDINA Active No Collection Activity 190.73$ 00113427 0202917004 5201 48TH ST W EDINA Active First Notice 190.36$ 00127078 0202860001 5013 EDINBROOK LN EDINA Active No Collection Activity 188.96$ 00124563 0335035018 4451 76TH ST W EDINA Finalled First Notice 188.32$ 00114875 0340462001 6428 JOSEPHINE AVE EDINA Active First Notice 188.02$ 00126980 0203261004 5013 WILLIAM AVE EDINA Active No Collection Activity 187.87$ 00125201 0201087000 5409 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA Active No Collection Activity 186.39$ 00085868 0305597011 411 JACKSON AVE EDINA Active First Notice 185.31$ 00123832 0201302009 4416 58TH ST W EDINA Active First Notice 181.23$ 00126538 0203247003 5121 WILLIAM AVE EDINA Active No Collection Activity 181.23$ 00082921 0201561005 4001 48TH ST W EDINA Active First Notice 178.65$ 00110376 0202040004 4507 GOLF TER EDINA Active First Notice 177.37$ 00126710 0340400006 5025 VALLEY VIEW RD EDINA Active First Notice 174.48$ 00127256 0110654006 5928 BEARD AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 173.79$ 00126362 0305197006 5920 INTERLACHEN BLVD EDINA Active First Notice 170.28$ 00125563 0331300006 6800 BRITTANY RD EDINA Active First Notice 170.28$ 00124365 0159091237 7737 TANGLEWOOD CT EDINA Active No Collection Activity 169.31$ 00123909 0120234013 4412 VALLEY VIEW RD EDINA Active First Notice 169.29$ 00106602 0342640002 5337 WHITING AVE EDINA Active First Notice 169.14$ 00118620 0165025002 6725 WEST TRL EDINA Active First Notice 164.87$ 00127376 0161224000 5920 WALNUT DR EDINA Active First Notice 157.69$ 00127269 0290285003 4109 42ND ST W EDINA Active First Notice 156.05$ 00127372 0110664004 6017 BEARD AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 153.33$ RCHFLD RCHFLD 7620 XERXES AVE S EDINA NA NA 151.08$ 00126372 0193000094 6120 KELLOGG AVE UNIT #201 EDINA Active First Notice 150.92$ 00125431 0201592008 5112 FRANCE AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 149.73$ 00126602 0330842003 6708 CORNELIA DR EDINA Active First Notice 149.33$ 00123552 0342103002 6117 TRACY AVE EDINA Active First Notice 147.98$ 00098696 0299033045 4390 COOLIDGE AVE EDINA Active First Notice 143.60$ 00111941 0340741004 6332 ROLF AVE EDINA Active First Notice 141.49$ 00126534 0120463024 4512 VALLEY VIEW RD EDINA Active First Notice 137.76$ 00082936 0201580020 4812 FRANCE AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 136.81$ 00119336 0111194001 5704 XERXES AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 136.80$ 00086994 0330978009 6908 WOODDALE AVE EDINA Active First Notice 136.49$ 00085248 0304583010 5508 GOYA LN EDINA Finalled First Notice 134.86$ 00127298 0340337004 5320 62ND ST W EDINA Active First Notice 133.63$ 00082725 0201358002 5200 KELLOGG AVE EDINA Finalled First Notice 130.55$ 00119496 0342035005 6208 CRESCENT DR EDINA Finalled First Notice 129.55$ 00127409 0340547000 6440 WILRYAN AVE EDINA Active First Notice 112.22$ 00120981 0111746004 6317 FRANCE AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 110.12$ SLP SLP 4005 NATCHEZ AVE S EDINA Finalled NA 108.80$ 00126531 0342551081 6312 RED FOX LN EDINA Active First Notice 108.10$ 00126387 0331625004 7012 LYNMAR LN EDINA Active First Notice 102.27$ 00127379 0202319008 5611 ST ANDREWS AVE EDINA Active First Notice 102.03$ 00125487 0290181026 4104 FRANCE AVE S EDINA Active No Collection Activity 100.00$ Customer #Account #Service Address Town/City Account Status Collection Status Certification Balance 00127445 0202973005 4525 VANDERVORK AVE EDINA Active No Collection Activity 87.63$ 00098747 0342041007 6117 WESTRIDGE BLVD EDINA Active First Notice 84.22$ 00127230 0120177003 5841 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA Active First Notice 80.50$ 00086470 0306900226 4942 LINCOLN DR EDINA Finalled First Notice 80.24$ 00124563 0335035009 4451 76TH ST W EDINA Active First Notice 79.25$ 00127611 0290259005 4248 ALDEN DR EDINA Active No Collection Activity 78.45$ 00110733 0342753005 5920 SUN RD EDINA Active First Notice 76.21$ 00124855 0340471000 6352 JOSEPHINE AVE EDINA Active First Notice 70.82$ 00113341 0210008002 4381 MACKEY AVE EDINA Active 65.20$ 00120624 0110854004 5629 ABBOTT AVE S EDINA Active First Notice 63.59$ 00127524 0201358002 5200 KELLOGG AVE EDINA Active No Collection Activity 63.29$ 00127338 0201397005 5533 KELLOGG AVE EDINA Active First Notice 62.62$ 00127595 0152728000 6712 GALWAY DR EDINA Active First Notice 61.73$ 00125843 0120320009 6142 KELLOGG AVE EDINA Active First Notice 60.46$ 00127616 0201502007 4701 TOWNES RD EDINA Active No Collection Activity 58.81$ 00127383 0290057009 4311 BRANSON ST EDINA Active First Notice 57.77$ 00125968 0191000101 7675 WOODVIEW CT EDINA Active First Notice 57.23$ 00127728 0202911000 4512 BROOKSIDE AVE EDINA Active No Collection Activity 52.02$ 340,559.67$ Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.H. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-88: Preliminary Rezoning & Preliminary Development Plan with Multiple Variances for City Homes at 4630 France Avenue Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2021-88 approving the Preliminary Rezoning and lot size and side yard setback variances and denying the rear yard setback and building coverage variances per the Planning Commission recommendation. INTRODUCTION: On September 22, 2021, the P lanning Commission recommended approval of the request per staff recommendation, which included denial of the rear yard setback and the building coverage variance. Vote 8 Ayes and 0 Nays. The City Council is asked to consider a re-development proposal to tear down the existing single-family home and build two villa style homes at 4630 France Avenue. A shared driveway off France Avenue would provide access for both homes. (See proposed plans and narrative.) The property to the north has a 4-unit townhome development zoned PRD-2, Planned Residential Development -2. The property to the south is a single-family home zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District. Further south are duplexes zoned R-2, Double Dwelling Unit District. To accommodate the request the following is requested: A Rezoning from R-1, Single-Dwelling Unit District to PRD-2 Planned Residential District 2. Preliminary P lat. Side yard setback variances from 20 feet to 7 feet and 15 feet. Rear yard setback variance from 35 feet to 25 feet. Building coverage variance from 25% to 26.3%. Lot size variance from 7,300 square feet to 5,016 square feet. ATTACHMENTS: Description Better Together Report 10-11-21 Noon Staff Report and Memos to Planning Commission, Sept 22 Resolution No. 2021-88 (denial) Resolution No. 2021-88 (approval) Proposed Plans and Narrative Site Location, Zoning and Street View Comprehensive Land Use Plan Staff Presentation Potential Building Pads for Construction of a Code Compliant single-family home Revised Engineering Memo - October 12, 2021 Revised Site Plan Submitted to the Council on October 5 (back lot home shifted to the south) Turning Radius Comparison - Villa Home vs. Duplex Survey Responses 30 January 2019 - 11 October 2021 Public Hearing Comments-4630 FranceAve. S. Better Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: Proposal by City Homes to tear down the existing single- family home and build two villa type homes at 4630 France Avenue VISITORS 28 CONTRIBUTORS 17 RESPONSES 19 1 Registered 0 Unverified 16 Anonymous 1 Registered 0 Unverified 18 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Sep 13, 2021 10:38:54 am Last Seen:Sep 13, 2021 10:38:54 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Katharine Winston Q2.Address 4634 FRANCE AVE S Q3.Comment STUCCO on the exterior for a better blend between the old on the South side (1929 home) and newer on the North side (townhouses) Respondent No:2 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Sep 16, 2021 09:12:49 am Last Seen:Sep 16, 2021 09:12:49 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Laura J. Westlund Q2.Address 4626 France Avenue South, Edina, MN 55410 Q3.Comment Comments for Edina Planning Commission meeting, September 22, 2021, regarding sketch plan proposal for development and rezoning at 4630 France Avenue South I strongly urge members of Edina’s Planning Commission and City Council to visit the site of 4630 France Avenue South in person in order to appreciate the impact of the construction of proposed Villa Home 1 on this neighborhood and adjacent residents on France Avenue and Meadow Road. The construction of a second home on this property is incongruent with the White Oaks neighborhood, and the area between France Avenue South and Meadow Road, and 46th and 47th Streets, is an extraordinary, unique landscape in our urban environment, characterized by dense vegetation and a remarkable array of wildlife; the block is extremely private and dominated by natural beauty. The affect of the rezoning proposal and the construction of Villa Home 1 on current residents of the neighborhood cannot be fully understood by viewing the property online or by driving by on France Avenue. Laura Westlund 4626 France Avenue South, Edina Respondent No:3 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Sep 21, 2021 15:12:09 pm Last Seen:Sep 21, 2021 15:12:09 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Scott Fischmann Q2.Address 4613 Meadow Rd., Edina, MN Q3.Comment We are on the east side and down the hill from this lot and we would, of course, prefer that there would be no change to the existing setbacks and no variance given to allow them to set it back further towards the rear lot line. Looking at the drawings, this thing with the gable looming over us is going to be really high. Putting it any closer to that rear lot line, or getting a variance to do so, is going to result in something that’s really going to loom over our home. Our home sits at the bottom of the hill and this would be at the top of the hill. We have some real concerns about that. -Transcribed by City Staff (Voicemail received 9-16-21 at 5:19 PM) Respondent No:4 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Sep 22, 2021 07:53:42 am Last Seen:Sep 22, 2021 07:53:42 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Heather Isaacs Q2.Address 4640 France Avenue S Q3.Comment I have a feeling this project will be a done deal, but would like to submit comments anyway. I agree with the Affordable Housing Manager in that this proposal likely isn't going to be affordable given its size and that City Homes typically builds high-end housing. I am also concerned about the sizing of the houses and two 2-car garages being tightly fitted onto that lot. A more reasonable fit for the neighborhood and the lot would be a duplex like the 3 existing ones on the block. Over- under style with garages behind or tucked under. Scale down a bit to keep both homes from overshadowing the single- family home to the south where the owner has invested extensive time and money into an environmentally-friendly landscape, which will probably be affected by tall buildings blocking the sun. Respondent No:5 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 05, 2021 11:53:11 am Last Seen:Oct 05, 2021 11:53:11 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Katharine Winston Q2.Address 4634 FRANCE AVE S Q3.Comment Imagine with me - you wake up tomorrow and your next door neighbor has cleared the lot and installed a 30’ watch tower for his children’s pleasure approximately 16’ from your backyard or make that 7’! YIKES! how did that happen - aren’t there established building codes that should have been applied? Yet today TWO houses are being proposed for a lot measuring 210’x48’ 12 years ago I was fortunate enough to find a house that had been on the market for 9 months. The previous owner had made wonderful enhancements to the property: re-stuccoed the house, replaced all the windows with Marvin products, remodeled the kitchen, and had even put in central air! It was mine for $319,000 (bottom of the market) The first thing I did was to hire a company to install fencing around the backyard for my rather large German shepherd. The contractor followed the law concerning fence installation - 1’ from the property line and no higher than 6’-DONE The next year I decided I needed to make the house more family friendly and more aging in place friendly. There was no room to put a bathroom on the first floor - not even a teeny, tiny one! So, again, I hired a designer who consulted with the City of Edina as to what was allowed and what permits were needed. With the length of the house only needing to be extended another 8’ , a new 2 car garage at the basement level replaced the single car garage while a family room, laundry facility, and full size bathroom were added above on the main level. The new footprint matched my neighbor’s to the south in length and did not go past my neighbor’s garage to the north. I have spent the last 9 years landscaping both the front and backyards myself. This spring I added a lovely 10’x10’ deck in the backyard - following city guidelines - so that I could enjoy the vistas and the fruits of my years of labor. MY POINT: Edina has stipulated that projects should adhere to the neighborhood guidelines, and I and my neighbors have done that. The area between 46th and 47th Streets has been designated LOW density and ATTACHED residential. As that is what has been set forth then so be it. Guidelines must not be set only to be set aside to the detriment of the established neighborhood. My neighbors and I have enjoyed many years of lovely views and wonderful sense of privacy…..We are also aware that change is a coming. We support the concept of twin homes or a duplex which would maintain the established sight lines of the backyards. It would be an unspeakable tragedy to drop a second home in that backyard. Respondent No:6 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 09, 2021 05:19:55 am Last Seen:Oct 09, 2021 05:19:55 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Susan Wahman Q2.Address 4715 Meadow Road Q3.Comment Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: Many neighbors are opposed to a redevelopment proposal that would build two separate houses on this narrow 48-foot lot. Many of us do support a plan for attached twin homes that would (1) better conform to Edina’s Comprehensive Plan, and (2) lessen the significant negative impact to the properties of immediate neighbors. A twin home plan would still allow the developer to build comparably-sized homes. At the City Council public hearing on October 5, the builder's only objection to a twin home plan was the limited width of a side entry driveway to the attached garages of a twin home. We believe this can be addressed satisfactorily and is a clearly beneficial alternative to the disruption that a second home built squarely in the middle of a backyard will present to neighbors' properties. We ask that you vote against the approval of this project as it currently stands. Sincerely, Susan Wahman Respondent No:7 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 09, 2021 06:50:35 am Last Seen:Oct 09, 2021 06:50:35 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Barry Gerst Q2.Address 3909 West, 48 Th Street Q3.Comment Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: Many neighbors are opposed to a redevelopment proposal that would build two separate houses on this narrow 48-foot lot. Many of us do support a plan for attached twin homes that would (1) better conform to Edina’s Comprehensive Plan, and (2) lessen the significant negative impact to the properties of immediate neighbors. A twin home plan would still allow the developer to build comparably-sized homes. At the City Council public hearing on October 5, the builder's only objection to a twin home plan was the limited width of a side entry driveway to the attached garages of a twin home. We believe this can be addressed satisfactorily and is a clearly beneficial alternative to the disruption that a second home built squarely in the middle of a backyard will present to neighbors' properties. We ask that you vote against the approval of this project as it currently stands. Sincerely, Barry Gerst Respondent No:8 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 09, 2021 08:06:35 am Last Seen:Oct 09, 2021 08:06:35 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Michelle Pauley Q2.Address 9 Bridge Lane, Edina, MN 55424 Q3.Comment Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: Many neighbors are opposed to a redevelopment proposal that would build two separate houses on this narrow 48-foot lot. Many of us do support a plan for attached twin homes that would (1) better conform to Edina’s Comprehensive Plan, and (2) lessen the significant negative impact to the properties of immediate neighbors. A twin home plan would still allow the developer to build comparably-sized homes. At the City Council public hearing on October 5, the builder's only objection to a twin home plan was the limited width of a side entry driveway to the attached garages of a twin home. We believe this can be addressed satisfactorily and is a clearly beneficial alternative to the disruption that a second home built squarely in the middle of a backyard will present to neighbors' properties. We ask that you vote against the approval of this project as it currently stands. Sincerely, Michelle Pauley Respondent No:9 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 09, 2021 11:31:26 am Last Seen:Oct 09, 2021 11:31:26 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Jon Pauley Q2.Address 9 Bridge Lane Q3.Comment I am not in support of two separate houses with one being 3 stories behind the existing houses. it's fine to have a tandem, but it needs to fit with the neighborhood and not create a disturbance for existing homeowners. They purchased based upon the house and yards, not two houses with one completely back on the property line. I believe the builder should build within the existing zoning laws. Respondent No:10 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 09, 2021 13:21:53 pm Last Seen:Oct 09, 2021 13:21:53 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Edward Clausman Q2.Address 4544 meadow rd Q3.Comment Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: Many neighbors are opposed to a redevelopment proposal that would build two separate houses on this narrow 48-foot lot. Many of us do support a plan for attached twin homes that would (1) better conform to Edina’s Comprehensive Plan, and (2) lessen the significant negative impact to the properties of immediate neighbors. A twin home plan would still allow the developer to build comparably-sized homes. At the City Council public hearing on October 5, the builder's only objection to a twin home plan was the limited width of a side entry driveway to the attached garages of a twin home. We believe this can be addressed satisfactorily and is a clearly beneficial alternative to the disruption that a second home built squarely in the middle of a backyard will present to neighbors' properties. We ask that you vote against the approval of this project as it currently stands. Respondent No:11 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 09, 2021 14:11:59 pm Last Seen:Oct 09, 2021 14:11:59 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Maureen and Dan Smith Q2.Address 4820 Townes Road, Edina MN 55424 Q3.Comment Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: Many neighbors are opposed to a redevelopment proposal that would build two separate houses on this narrow 48-foot lot. Many of us do support a plan for attached twin homes that would (1) better conform to Edina’s Comprehensive Plan, and (2) lessen the significant negative impact to the properties of immediate neighbors. A twin home plan would still allow the developer to build comparably-sized homes. At the City Council public hearing on October 5, the builder's only objection to a twin home plan was the limited width of a side entry driveway to the attached garages of a twin home. We believe this can be addressed satisfactorily and is a clearly beneficial alternative to the disruption that a second home built squarely in the middle of a backyard will present to neighbors' properties. We ask that you vote against the approval of this project as it currently stands. Sincerely, Dan and Maureen Smith 4820 Townes Road Edina, MN 55424 Respondent No:12 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 09, 2021 14:50:58 pm Last Seen:Oct 09, 2021 14:50:58 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name MARK VELDMAN Q2.Address 4600 meadow rd Q3.Comment Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: Many neighbors are opposed to a redevelopment proposal that would build two separate houses on this narrow 48-foot lot. Many of us do support a plan for attached twin homes that would (1) better conform to Edina’s Comprehensive Plan, and (2) lessen the significant negative impact to the properties of immediate neighbors. A twin home plan would still allow the developer to build comparably-sized homes. We ask that you vote against the approval of this project as it currently stands. Respondent No:13 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 10, 2021 06:35:59 am Last Seen:Oct 10, 2021 06:35:59 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Linda Lewis Q2.Address 4825 Townes Rd Q3.Comment I agree with twin home plan. Respondent No:14 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 10, 2021 15:06:29 pm Last Seen:Oct 10, 2021 15:06:29 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Karin Wille and Mike Casserly Q2.Address 4701 Meadow Road Q3.Comment Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: Many neighbors are opposed to a redevelopment proposal that would build two separate houses on this narrow 48-foot lot. Many of us do support a plan for attached twin homes that would (1) better conform to Edina’s Comprehensive Plan, and (2) lessen the significant negative impact to the properties of immediate neighbors. A twin home plan would still allow the developer to build comparably-sized homes. At the City Council public hearing on October 5, the builder's only objection to a twin home plan was the limited width of a side entry driveway to the attached garages of a twin home. We believe this can be addressed satisfactorily and is a clearly beneficial alternative to the disruption that a second home built squarely in the middle of a backyard will present to neighbors' properties. We ask that you vote against the approval of this project as it currently stands. Sincerely, Karin Wille and Mike Casserly Respondent No:15 Login:Lynne Stanley Email:lynne.e.stanley@gmail.com Responded At:Oct 10, 2021 16:56:46 pm Last Seen:Oct 10, 2021 23:00:03 pm IP Address:68.46.58.42 Q1.First and Last Name Lynne Stanley Q2.Address 4107 West 48th Street, Edina, MN 55424 Q3.Comment To the Honorable Mayor and City Council, I appreciated the opportunity to watch the October 5, 2021, simultaneous broadcast of the public hearing held on this matter. Although not directly affected by the proposed redevelopment, I certainly view it as at variance with the general character of this neighborhood. It clearly would directly and significantly compromise the homes and properties surrounding it. It would be more consistent with Edina's Comprehensive Plan to require that any twin homes built at 4630 France be attached, as are the twin homes on France Avenue not far north of that property. In addition, attached twin homes would greatly lessen the negative impacts on the closet neighbors. Many of the closest neighbors to the site are supportive of twin homes being built at 4630 France so long as they are attached. Attached twin homes at that location would also be consistent with the attached twin homes on West 49th Street that are already present within the larger neighborhood. The only objection the builder voiced to an attached twin homes model related to driveway size constraints. That should be a solvable issue. If the builder believes it is not, the builder should be required to provide reasonable and persuasive evidence demonstrating that is the case. Please vote against the approval of this project as it presently stands. Respondent No:16 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 10, 2021 17:22:37 pm Last Seen:Oct 10, 2021 17:22:37 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Nimnuan Wannasri Q2.Address 4613 Meadow Rd. Q3.Comment I live on Meadow Rd. in the house directly to the west and behind 4630 France. Unless the planned backyard house is shifted towards the front of the lot to form a twin home, it will completely ruin the sightlines from the backyards, backyard decks, and rear windows of the twin home to the north belonging to Laura Westlund and the home to the south belonging to Katharine Winston. Our own home's elevation is about 20 feet lower than where the west villa home would sit, down a steep hill from its rear lot line. From our rear window wall or backyard deck, we would be looking up and out at the west villa's three levels (its lower basement level being largely exposed because of the slope of the lot). Adding the 20 foot difference in lot elevation to over 30 feet of roof height means we will be looking up at a roof gable over 50 feet higher than our backyard deck. If several council members were ever able to swing by for a few minutes to visit our backyards, they might better appreciate the impact on the neighborhood properties. We understand the need to develop the property profitably and the trend to multifamily housing, which we are not opposed to. We would simply like to see the two villas merged into attached twin homes; they could have the same square footages and garage sizes as the originally-planned villa homes, but their rear setback would be more in line with the existing twin homes across the north lot line. This would greatly reduce the damage to the neighbors' properties. Thank you. -- Nimnuan Wannasri, 4613 Meadow Rd. Respondent No:17 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 11, 2021 07:05:23 am Last Seen:Oct 11, 2021 07:05:23 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Heather Isaacs Q2.Address 4640 France Avenue S Q3.Comment Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: Many neighbors are opposed to a redevelopment proposal that would build two separate houses on this narrow 48-foot lot. Many of us do support a plan for attached twin homes that would (1) better conform to Edina’s Comprehensive Plan, and (2) lessen the significant negative impact to the properties of immediate neighbors. A twin home plan would still allow the developer to build comparably-sized homes. At the City Council public hearing on October 5, the builder's only objection to a twin home plan was the limited width of a side entry driveway to the attached garages of a twin home. We believe this can be addressed satisfactorily and is a clearly beneficial alternative to the disruption that a second home built squarely in the middle of a backyard will present to neighbors' properties. We ask that you vote against the approval of this project as it currently stands. Sincerely, Heather Isaacs Respondent No:18 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 11, 2021 08:54:46 am Last Seen:Oct 11, 2021 08:54:46 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Jan Monson Q2.Address 3945 West 49th St Q3.Comment Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: My hope is that you will make a decision that will benefit the existing neighbors rather than the developers. Seems like increased density is the goal of many of the City Councils, past & present. The neighbors are not opposed to a duplex and my hope is that you will be more empathetic to the neighbor’s concerns over the developer’s proposal to build two separate houses. Which type of development would you favor next door to you? Many neighbors are opposed to a redevelopment proposal that would build two separate houses on this narrow 48-foot lot. Many of us do support a plan for attached twin homes that would (1) better conform to Edina’s Comprehensive Plan, and (2) lessen the significant negative impact to the properties of immediate neighbors. A twin home plan would still allow the developer to build comparably-sized homes. At the City Council public hearing on October 5, the builder's only objection to a twin home plan was the limited width of a side entry driveway to the attached garages of a twin home. We believe this can be addressed satisfactorily and is a clearly beneficial alternative to the disruption that a second home built squarely in the middle of a backyard will present to neighbors' properties. We ask that you vote against the approval of this project as it currently stands. Sincerely, Jan Monson Respondent No:19 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 11, 2021 10:05:41 am Last Seen:Oct 11, 2021 10:05:41 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Laura Westlund Q2.Address 4626 France Avenue South, Edina, MN 55410 Q3.Comment The proposed west villa of the two single-family homes in the sketch proposal plan for the new development of 4630 France Avenue South is inappropriate for this lot. The house extends significantly further west than any other dwelling on the 4600 block of France Avenue South and disrupts the established backyard area that runs between France Avenue South and Meadow Road for this entire block. The arguments made by the Planning Commission and the City of Edina to connect this proposal to Edina's Comprehensive Plan are weak; these two single-family homes with elevators endeavor to "accommodate housing needs of Edina's changing population" by allowing seniors in our community to age in place, but the proposed development for 4630 France does not align with other "Trends and Challenges" in the Housing section of Edina's Comprehensive Plan, namely, "Mitigating effects of new developments on existing neighborhoods," "Maintaining community character," and "Accommodating affordability in a high property value community." The argument presented at the City Council meeting on October 5 that a twin home cannot be built on this property because of issues with the driveways and turnaround space for the two homes is also weak, and there is no hardship that requires a side yard variance from the city standard of 20 feet to 7 feet: the two proposed single-family homes, especially the west villa and its location on the lot, are simply inappropriate for the lot and the context of this 4600 block on France. R. Castellano, 10-11-2021, Page 1 of 9 Delivered via email on Monday, October 11, 2021 for inclusion the City Council Public Hearing record concerning the City Homes Proposal at 4630 France Avenue South. Mayor and City Council, I am writing in opposition to the City Homes proposed redevelopment of 4630 France Avenue South (“the City Homes@4630 proposal”), and I call on the City Council to vote against the current proposal. It appears that the City of Edina (“Edina”) is attempting to mislead the public on behalf of development interests by putting forward false, misleading, incomplete, and ambiguous data. The City’s support for the proposal, and the problematic data, are disturbing, and suggest deeper problems related to Edina’s planning and development functions. The proposal appears to actually constitute an R-1 subdivision to construct two single-family detached homes on the lot, which is an unreasonable use of the lot. The proposed redevelopment would serve to severely disrupt the neighborhood character. This disruption would include setting a new precedent by severely reducing R-1 lot size from the required minimum of 9,000 square feet, down to 5,016 square feet. This disruption would also include setting a new precedent by reducing the front street setback by roughly 17 feet, and possibly more, about a 36% reduction, without even disclosing the setback reduction to the public during the public hearing process. It was not discussed until after I exposed the scheme in my testimony at the City Council Public Hearing. The unscrupulous attempt by Edina, to covertly reduce the front street setbacks is part of a pattern that includes the Southdale Design Experience Guidelines, a recent redevelopment proposal at 4040 West 70th Street, and the codification of, and an attempt to further codify unscrupulous schemes into the zoning code. The focus of this letter is on various data from the October 5, 2021 City Council Public Hearing for the City Homes@4630 proposal. I. Cary Teague’s Staff Report (Attachment 2 on the Coversheet for the City Council Public Hearing). A. Ambiguous statement comparing the City Homes@4630 proposal to the White Oaks Townhomes is later followed by explicitly stated falsehoods. The White Oaks Townhomes contain two groupings. Each grouping containing two attached dwellings, for a total of four dwellings. The City Homes@4630 proposal is for two detached dwellings. The following statement is ambiguous as to exactly what configurations the proposed project shares with the WOTs. R. Castellano, 10-11-2021, Page 2 of 9 See Page 2 under the heading “Rezoning”, Item (1), Para. 3, Sentence 1: “The proposed project consists of two single-family detached dwellings in a configuration like the townhome development to the north.” In later pages, in a discussion of Minnesota Statutes and Variances, Cary repeatedly and falsely equates the City Homes@4630 proposal with the White Oaks Townhomes, and falsely describes the White Oaks Townhomes as “detached”. Page 5, Item 1), Para.2, Sentence 3: “The proposed two lot development is the same as the 4-lot development to the north.” Page 5, Item 1), Para.4, Sentence 1: “The proposed development is reasonable compared to the existing 4-lot detached single dwelling unit development to the north.” Page 5, Item 1), Para.2, Sentence 3: “The proposed homes would be located similar on the site than the single family detached homes to the north that are also accessed by a shared driveway.” These false statements are repeated on Page 6, in support of proposed variances, under the heading: “Are the proposed variances reasonable?”, and on Page 7 in the Staff Recommendations section. B. Misrepresentative comparison of lots and lot sizes. 1. Cary misrepresented the comparative lot square footage per dwelling unit by omitting the White Oaks Townhomes common area. Under the heading “Rezoning” in the “Supporting Information” section, Cary states: “The proposed project consists of two single-family detached dwellings in a configuration like the townhome development to the north. The proposed density is the same as the development to the north. The average lot size is 4,388 square feet in size to the north, which is smaller than the proposed two lots. (Proposed lots are 5,016 square feet in size.)” Page 2, “Rezoning”, Number (1), Paragraph 3. With these measurements, Cary implies that the City Homes@4630 proposal is on larger lots than the White Oaks Townhomes. But that is a false and misleading comparison because Cary failed to include R. Castellano, 10-11-2021, Page 3 of 9 the 2,887 square-foot commons area at the White Oaks Townhomes. When the commons area is properly included, the opposite is true. The average lot size of each of the four White Oaks Townhomes is 5,121 square feet, exceeding the 5,016 square feet of the City Homes@4630 proposal by 105 square feet. In spite of these facts, Cary goes on to straddle the fence and ambiguously imply that the City Homes@4630 proposal has larger lots than the White Oaks Townhomes, for example: “The proposal is consistent with the lot sizes to the north, (slightly larger) and provides a buffer from the single-family homes to the west to France Avenue.” Staff Report, Page 3, Number (2), Para. 2, Sentence 2. The commons area for the White Oaks Townhomes is outlined in blue in the screenshot below from the Hennepin County Property Database: 2. Cary falsely understated the effective housing unit density (dwelling units per acre) of the City Homes@4630 proposal. In the Comprehensive Plan, the White Oaks Townhomes are guided for 4 to 8 dwelling units per acre (“du/acre”). R. Castellano, 10-11-2021, Page 4 of 9 In the Supporting Information section on Page 3 of his Staff Report (under the paragraph heading “Planning”), Cary reports that the City Homes@4630 proposal is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for 4 to 8 du/acre, and that the proposed density “is the same as the development to the north” (Page 3, Rezoning, Item (1), Para. 3, Sentence 2). That is false. In fact, neither the White Oaks Townhomes, nor the City Homes@4630 proposal are large enough to accommodate a density of 8 du/acre. But the White Oaks Townhomes contain slightly more acreage, resulting in an effective density at the White Oaks Townhomes that is slightly less than what the City Homes@4630 proposal would be. The effective density of the White Oak Townhomes (all 5 lots combined), is 8.51 du/acre. The City Homes@4630 proposal would exceed that with an effective density of 8.68 du/acre. So, the City Homes@4630 proposal calling for two detached homes (instead of attached) serves to exacerbate the problem stemming from the fact that it starts with less supporting acreage per dwelling unit than the White Oaks Townhomes II. False imagery concerning front street setbacks are contained in Cary’s Slideshow presentation (Attachment 11 on the Coversheet for the City Council’s Public Hearing). A. The White Oaks Townhomes are falsely portrayed with a smaller front street setback. See screenshot below from Slideshow Page 2. In this map image, the 4630 France lot is highlighted in pink. 4630 France and the five singles and duplexes to the south of it all share a uniform front street setback. The White Oaks Townhomes are the two elongated structures immediately north of 4630. The White Oaks Townhomes are falsely shown projecting out closer to France Avenue than the homes to the south. The false imagery is repeated on Slideshow Page 4. In fact, the City Homes@4630 proposal would be the only structure on the entire 4600 block that would not maintain the setbacks on the block, which are roughly 47 feet, and in some cases more. The City Homes@4630 proposal would be detrimental to the neighborhood, by altering the front street setbacks and serving to disrupt the neighborhood character. B. Interestingly, the City’s online zoning map does not portray the erroneous imagery (see the comparative screenshot below). C. In fact, the White Oaks Townhomes maintained the neighborhood setbacks, even with the PRD-2 zoning. Even though the White Oaks Townhomes are zoned PRD-2, they maintained the front street setback of all six homes to the south, which is roughly 47 feet. R. Castellano, 10-11-2021, Page 5 of 9 Slideshow Page 2: Contrast to Edina’s Online Zoning Map https://edinagis.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=6e8c334f8bd04c39ba8741f20e55afe5: Front street setbacks falsely portray the White Oaks Townhomes much closer to France Avenue than homes to the south. Front street setbacks at the White Oaks Townhomes shown in line with homes to south. R. Castellano, 10-11-2021, Page 6 of 9 D. Hennepin County aerial photo documents the White Oaks Townhomes front street setbacks. Even though the White Oaks Townhomes are zoned PRD-2, they maintained the front street setback of all six homes to the south, which is roughly 47 feet. The screenshot below is a 2009 record in the Hennepin County Property Database. The lighting and image quality were particularly good in 2009 for viewing this area. The blue highlighting identifies the 4630 property. In this aerial view, you can see that the front street setbacks on the White Oaks Townhomes maintained the setbacks of the singles or doubles to the south on the 4600 block of France Avenue South. The brown rectangles of the White Oaks Townhomes are the upper-level roof of the units, and are an accurate reflection of the front of the building. For clarification, the townhomes are attached in an east-west orientation, and the lower roof, under which the units are joined, is a muted grey. R. Castellano, 10-11-2021, Page 7 of 9 R. Castellano, 10-11-2021, Page 8 of 9 E. Cary’s slideshow presentation. Page 4 repeats the false front street setback data that was shown on Page 2. See screenshot below. The falsely reduced front street setbacks are seen again on the lots labeled 4620 and 4624. R. Castellano, 10-11-2021, Page 9 of 9 III. Developer misrepresentation or misstatement was not corrected by Cary. A. In testimony. In responding to Council questions concerning the development potential at 4630 France, Jeff Ziebarth of Perkins & Wills stated that if a single-family home were to be built, that “this could be nearly a 5,000 square-foot house”. Link@ 1.08.37 https://youtu.be/AnAcgY6-bek?t=4117 It appears to me that this was an erroneous assertion, and I hope you will verify what is correct. In reading the R-1 zoning code, Sec. 36-438 (1) a., it states that for “Lots 9,000 square feet or greater in area. Building coverage shall be not more than 25 percent for all buildings and structures. 25% of 10,032 would be 2,508 square feet, not 5,000 square feet. A. In print. Example is from Attachment 5 of the Council’s Coversheet for the Public Hearing. In the developer’s submittal, Page 1, Para. 2, the R-1 homes are represented as “outliers” in “this stretch of France Avenue”. That is not true. There are 3 duplexes, 3 single-family homes, and 2 sets of townhomes. The single-family homes are not outliers. These are just some examples of problems. I hope that the City Council will wish to make decisions fully informed with accurate data. I hope this letter serves to help in that regard. I hope you will not approve the current proposal. Sincerely, Roberta Castellano 4854 France Ave S By Simply Homes 4630 France Avenue Edina, Minnesota by Simply Homes The new development would propose the construction of two (2) villa type homes to be built on the 4630 France Avenue lot/parcel. The existing home on site is vacant, listed as a teardown and been on the market for many months. In this specific setting, we believe there is a market for smaller single family detached homes as a viable option to a town home setting or condominium. There are several townhome developments nearby this location (one directly north and adjacent this site). The specifics of the new homes include the following: • Approximately 2,400 SF of living space (each unit) • 2 car garage • 3 Bedroom, 4 Bath including Recreation Room (or 4th Bedroom) and Home Office • 2 ½ story construction (slab on grade), ground level floor depressed (verify grading) to reduce overall height • Architectural style would be urban cottage • Exterior materials to include (several study options and combinations): Board and batten siding, vertical siding in combination with stained (or painted) wood siding and shingle or metal roofs. Planning variances and rezoning request would include the following: • Re-zoning to enable 2 units on this lot/parcel • Proposed Rear Yard Setback reduced to 20’ – 0” versus 25’ – 0” required • Assumes Side Yard Setbacks of 7’- 0” (verify requirement) • Assume 35’ – 0” Front Yard Setback (verify requirement) • Lot Coverage: Proposed building and hardscape at 33% of lot area, not including reduction for pervious paving (verify requirement) R-1 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-1 R-1 PRD-2 Scott Fischmann Submittal 1of 4 asdfsadfsdaf asdfsadfasdf Scott Fischmann Submittal 2 of 4 Scott Fischmann Submittal 3 of 4 Scott Fischmann Submittal 4 of 4 The Planning Commission is asked to consider a re-development proposal to tear down the existing single-family home and build two villa style homes at 4630 France Avenue. A shared driveway off France Avenue would provide access for both homes. (See proposed plans and narrative.) The property to the north contains a 4-unit townhome development zoned PRD-2, Planned Residential Development -2. The property to the south is a single-family home zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District. Further south are duplexes zoned R-2, Double Dwelling Unit District. (See attached zoning map.) To accommodate the request the following is required: ¾ A Rezoning from R-1, Single-Dwelling Unit District to PRD-2 Planned Residential District 2. ¾ Preliminary Plat. ¾ Side yard setback variances from 20 feet to 7 feet and 15 feet. ¾ Rear yard setback variance from 35 feet to 25 feet. ¾ Building coverage variance from 25% to 26.3%. ¾ Lot size variance from 7,300 square feet to 5,016 square feet. September 22, 2021 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Preliminary Rezoning & Preliminary Development Plan with Variances for City Homes at 4630 France Avenue. Information / Background: STAFF REPORT Page 2 SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: A 4-unit single dwelling unit attached residential development; zoned PRD-2, Planned Residential District and guided Low Density Attached Residential. Easterly: France Avenue and the City of Minneapolis. Southerly: Single-family home, zoned R-1, and guided Low Density Attached Residential. Westerly: Single-family homes, zoned R-1, and guided Low Density Residential. Existing Site Features The subject property is 10,032 acres in size and contains a single-family home. Planning Guide Plan designation: LDAR, Low Density Residential Attached Residential (4-8 units per acre). Zoning: R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District Rezoning Per Section 36-213 of the Zoning Ordinance “the commission may recommend approval by the council based upon, but not limited to, the following factors:” (1) Is consistent with the comprehensive plan; The subject property is guided low density residential attached, which is described as “two- family and attached dwellings of low densities and moderate heights. This category recognizes the historical role of these housing types as transitional districts between single- family residential areas and major thoroughfares or commercial districts. May include single-family detached dwellings.” “Introduction of more contemporary housing types, such as low- density townhouses, may be an appropriate replacement for two- family dwellings in some locations, provided that adequate transitions to and buffering of adjacent dwellings can be achieved.” The density allowed within this district is 4 - 8 residential dwelling units per acre. The proposed project consists of two single-family detached dwellings in a configuration like the townhome development to the north. The proposed density is the same as the development to the north. The average lot size is 4,388 square feet in size to the north, which is smaller than the proposed two lots. (Proposed lots are 5,016 square feet in size.) STAFF REPORT Page 3 (2) Will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract; The project would not be detrimental to surrounding properties. The proposal is consistent with the lot sizes to the north, (slightly larger) and provides a buffer from the single-family homes to the west to France Avenue. The land use configuration is as described in the Comprehensive Plan “This category (Low Density Attached Residential) recognizes the historical role of these housing types as transitional districts between single- family residential areas and major thoroughfares or commercial districts.” (3) Will not result in an overly intensive land use; With the reduction of the size of the homes provided to reduce the number of variances requested (rear yard setback variance and building coverage) the development would not result in an overly intensive land use. The density is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the lot sizes are consistent with the lot sizes to the north and similarly zoned property. (4) Will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards; The addition of one single-family home would not result in an undue traffic congestion or hazards on France Avenue. (5) Conforms to the provisions of this section and other applicable provisions of this Code; and There are several variances requested with this project. Staff is not in support of all of the variances as proposed. The size of the homes should be reduced to eliminate the building coverage variance and the rear yard setback variance. The other variances are reasonable due to the small lot size and narrow lot width. (6) Provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. The proposed lot configuration and building location is similar to the development to the north. (See attached aerial photograph of the area.) There would be a 17-foot distance between the duplex to the north and the proposed home, and a 19-foot distance between the proposed home and the single-family home to the south. Within the City’s single-family residential areas with 50-foot-wide lots (Country Club and much of east Edina) the separation between single-family homes is often 10 feet. Therefore, staff believes the relationship between structures is reasonable. Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and has recommended some changes. These changes would be required at the time of building permit. (See attached.) Any approvals of this project would be subject to review and approval of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, as they are the City’s review authority over the grading of the site. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Sustainability The applicant has provided the sustainability questionnaire. (See attached.) Additionally, the City’s sustainability coordinator has reviewed the plans and provided comments and recommendations in the engineering memo. (See attached engineering memo.) These shall be made conditions of approval. Park Dedication Park dedication for one new lot would be required to be paid at the time of building permit in the amount of $5,000. COMPLIANCE TABLE *Variance Required Variances – Setbacks & Building Size This section considers the following variances: Side yard setback variances from 20 feet to 7 feet and 15 feet; rear yard setback variance from 35 feet to 25 feet; building coverage variance from 25% to 26.3%; lot size variance from 7,300 square feet to 5,016 square feet. Per the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: City Standard (PRD-2) Proposed Structure Setbacks Front – France Avenue Side – North Side – South Rear – West 30 feet 20 feet 20 feet 35 feet 30 feet 7 feet* 15 feet* 25 feet* Height 2-1/2 stories and 30 feet 2-1/2 stories and 30 feet Density Lot area per unit - 7,300 s.f. 5,016 s.f.* Building Coverage 25% 26%* STAFF REPORT Page 5 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. “Practical difficulties” may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed variances mentioned above are reasonable if the proposed building sizes are reduced. The practical difficulty is caused by the small size of the lot and narrow width. The proposed two lot development is the same as the 4-lot development to the north. Staff believes it is reasonable to development the subject lot in the same manner. Staff recommends reducing the size of the buildings to meet the rear yard setback to maintain code compliant separation with the single-family development to the west and meet the building coverage requirement of 25%. The proposed development is reasonable compared to the existing 4-lot detached single- dwelling unit development to the north. The proposed lot sizes are slightly larger than the existing lots to the north. The average lot size of the development to the north is 4,388 square feet in size, smaller than the proposed two lots. Proposed lots are 5,016 square feet in size. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? Yes. The circumstance of this single-dwelling unit lot being guided as low density attached residential in the Comprehensive Plan and located adjacent to a PRD-2 zoning district is unique to the property and not common to the vast majority of the R-1 zoning district lots. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The variance would not alter the essential character of the district. The proposed homes would be located similar on the site than the single family detached homes to the north that are also accessed by a shared driveway. PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues x Is the proposed Rezoning reasonable? Yes. Staff does support the revised rezoning of the site, for the following reasons: STAFF REPORT Page 6 1. The proposed Rezoning is consistent with the adjacent 4-lot development to the north which has the same PRD-2 Zoning Designation. 2. The proposed lots are similar in size to the 4-lot development to the north. The average lot size of the development to the north is 4,388 square feet in size, smaller than the proposed two lots. Proposed lots are 5,016 square feet in size. 3. The relationship and spacing between adjacent structures is reasonable. There would be a 17-foot distance between the duplex to the north and the proposed home, and a 19-foot distance between the proposed home and the single-family home to the south. Within the City’s single-family residential areas with 50-foot-wide lots (Country Club and much of east Edina) the separation between single-family homes is often 10 feet. 4. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 5. The proposal meets the criteria for considering rezoning in Section 36-213 of the Zoning Ordinance as outlined on page 5-6 of this staff report. x Are the proposed variances reasonable? Yes. Staff does support the side yard setback variances and the lot size variances for the following reasons: 1. The practical difficulty is caused by the small size of the lot and narrow width. The proposed two lot development is the same as the 4-lot development to the north. Staff believes it is reasonable to development the subject lot in the same manner. 2. The requested rear yard setback and building coverage setbacks are not reasonable due to the large structure sizes. The size of the structures could be reduced and shifted to meet the rear yard setback and 25% building coverage requirement. The 35-foot rear yard setback provides a code compliant setback to the adjacent R-1 property to the west. 3. The proposed development is reasonable compared to the existing 4-lot detached single- dwelling unit development to the north. The proposed lot sizes are slightly larger than the existing lots to the north. The average lot size of the development to the north is 4,388 square feet in size, smaller than the proposed two lots. Proposed lots are 5,016 square feet in size. 4. The circumstance of this single-dwelling unit lot being guided as low density attached residential in the Comprehensive Plan and located adjacent to a PRD-2 zoning district is unique to the property and not common to the vast majority of the R-1 zoning district lots. 5. The variance would not alter the essential character of the district. The proposed homes would be located similar on the site than the located of the single family detached homes to the north that are also accessed by a shared driveway. STAFF REPORT Page 7 Staff Recommendation Options for Consideration & Recommendation A case can be made for approval and denial of this project. Below are options for the planning commission and city council to consider for approval and denial: Approval A. Recommend the City Council approve the request for Preliminary Rezoning from R-1 to PRD-2, Preliminary Plat, Side yard setback variances from 20 feet to 7 and 15 feet, and a lot size variance from 7,300 square feet to 5,016 square feet. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The practical difficulty is caused by the small size of the lot and narrow width. The proposed two lot development is the same as the 4-lot development to the north. Staff believes it is reasonable to development the subject lot in the same manner. 2. The requested rear yard setback and building coverage setbacks are not reasonable due to the large structure sizes. The size of the structures could be reduced and shifted to meet the rear yard setback and 25% building coverage requirement. The 35-foot rear yard setback provides a code compliant setback to the adjacent R-1 property to the west. 3. The proposed development is reasonable compared to the existing 4-lot attached residential development to the north. The proposed lot sizes are slightly larger than the existing lots to the north. The average lot size of the development to the north is 4,388 square feet in size, smaller than the proposed two lots. Proposed lots are 5,016 square feet in size. 4. There would be a 17-foot distance between the duplex to the north and the proposed home, and a 19-foot distance between the proposed home and the single-family home to the south. Within the City’s single-family residential areas with 50-foot-wide lots (Country Club and much of east Edina) the separation between single-family homes is often 10 feet. Therefore, staff believes the relationship between structures is reasonable. 5. The circumstance of this single-dwelling unit lot being guided as low density attached residential in the Comprehensive Plan and located adjacent to a PRD-2 zoning district is unique to the property and not common to the vast majority of the R-1 zoning district lots. 6. The variances would not alter the essential character of the district. The proposed homes would be located similar on the site than the located of the single family detached homes to the north that are also accessed by a shared driveway. 7. The proposal meets the criteria for considering rezoning in Section 36-213 of the Zoning Ordinance as outlined on page 5-6 of this staff report. STAFF REPORT Page 8 B. Recommend the City Council deny the proposed rear yard setback variance and building coverage variance. Denial is based on the following findings: 1. There are no practical difficulties associated with these requests. 2. The proposed structures could be reduced in size to meet the rear yard setback requirement and building coverage requirement. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Plans and Final Plat must be adjusted to meet the following: a. The rear yard setback for the structure on Lot 2 must meet the required setback of 35 feet. b. The overall building coverage may not exceed 25%. c. The front yard setback shall be no closer than 30 feet to the lot line on France Avenue. d. All revisions required in the engineering memo dated September 14, 2021 e. The Final Plat must include a 10-foot easement along France Avenue for Pedestrians and future sidewalk improvements. 2. Submittal of a construction management plan subject to review and approval of city staff prior to issuance of a building permit. No dumpsters or construction material shall be stored in the street. 3. Hours of construction must be consistent with City Code. 4. Park Dedication of $5,000 due at the time of building permit. 5. Compliance with the conditions required in the engineering memo dated September 14, 2021. 6. A shared driveway and maintenance agreement/easement must be established over the share driveway. The easement must be filed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first structure. 7. A separate water and sewer service and permit are required for each unit. 8. A 13-D Fire Sprinkler System is required in each home. Provide the required size of the domestic water for each unit to ensure complies for the fire sprinkler system. Denial Recommend the City Council deny the request for Preliminary Rezoning from R-1 to PRD-2, Preliminary Plat, side yard setback variances from 20 feet to 7 and 15 feet, rear yard setback variance from 35 to 25 feet, and a lot size variance from 7,300 square feet to 5,016 square feet. Approval is based on the following findings: Denial is based on the following findings: STAFF REPORT Page 9 1. The proposed density is not reasonable for the site. 2. The proposal does not meet the criteria for considering rezoning in Section 36-213 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The proposed variances do not meet the findings for a variance. 4. The proposed development is too large for the site. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the request subject to the findings and conditions listed above, and denial of the rear yard setback variance and building coverage variance. Deadline for a City decision: December 7, 2021 TO: Cary Teague, Community Development Director FROM: Stephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager DATE: August 30, 2021 RE: Proposed Villas on France The proposed Villas on France development entails demolishing a single family house at 4630 France Avenue and replacing with two single family houses. The rationale is that the property is too costly for a single family teardown, and there is a demand for houses for empty nesters who want to downsize. Comments in support of proposal: x The Housing Strategy Task Force recommended upzoning, or increasing density, along transit corridors. As the proposed development is not small (each unit would be 2,800 square feet; 3 bedrooms and 3 baths and 2 car garages) and the sale prices is unknown, but anticipated to be market rate for the area, it is unlikely to help the City in reaching the affordable housing goals. DATE: 9/14/2021 TO: 4630 France Ave, City Homes and Simply Homes CC: Cary Teague – Community Development Director FROM: Chad Millner, PE, Director of Engineering RE: 4630 France Ave – Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for pedestrian facilities, utility connections, grading, flood risk, and storm water. Plans reviewed included an existing survey, preliminary play, and stormwater management plan dated July and August 2021. Review Comment Required For General 1. Deliver as-build records of public and private utility infrastructure post construction. Certificate of Occupancy Survey 2. An existing and proposed site condition survey is required. Grading/Building Permit 2.1 Show all existing and proposed public and private easements. Grading/Building Permit Living Streets 3. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. Grading/Building Permit 4. Saw cut concrete sidewalk joints on public sidewalks. Grading/Building Permit 5. Public sidewalk to match existing. Grading/Building Permit Traffic and Street 6. Review fire access requirements with fire department. Fire truck turning template attached. Grading/Building Permit 7. Hennepin County Access Permit required for entrance reconstruction. Building Permit 8. Road patching shall conform to Hennepin County standards. Certificate of Occupancy 9. Provide 10’ easement along eastern side of property for future sidewalk improvements. Staff recommends minimal trees, plantings or other landscaping items within the easement. Grading/Building Permit Sanitary and Water Utilities 10. Served by City of Minneapolis. City of Minneapolis utility permits required. Grading/Building Permit 11. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 12. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 13. A SAC determination will be required by the Metropolitan Council. The SAC determination will be used by the City to calculate sewer and water connection charges Grading/Building Permit 14. A well may be located onsite. MDH to provide documentation as available. A licensed well contractor may be required to search the site for a well. Wells not in use must be sealed by a licensed well contractor per MN Rules, Chapter 4725. Certificate of Occupancy Storm Water Utility 15. Site drains to landlocked basins (MHN_65 and 66), a structural flooding issue (MHN_66), and private property (MHN_65). Demonstrate no increase in peak flood elevations for 1% annual chance flood event (NOAA Atlas 14, 100-year), volume control (1.1”x new contributing impervious), and rate control to private property (NOAA Atlas 14, 10-year). Provide existing and proposed hydrocad to confirm. Grading/Building Permit 16. The Minnesota Stormwater Manual recommends the 10’ as the minimum distance between an infiltration practice (rain garden 2) and a structure’s foundation. Revise. Grading/Building Permit 17. Rain garden #2’s overflow creates a new concentration of drainage that will affect downstream structures. Revise design to eliminate new concentration of drainage. Grading/Building Permit 18. Mitigation is distributed unevenly between the two sites. Revise to proportionally distribute mitigation per site. Recommend engineered pervious driveway with drains to direct overflow to street. Grading/Building Permit 19. Indicate the rain garden responsibility maintenance. Grading/Building Permit 20. Proposed lowest floors (904.93’) are above the required FEMA 1% annual chance 875.5’ with more than 2’ of freeboard. General Comment 21. Provide geotechnical report with soil borings. Grading/Building Permit 22. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report meeting watershed and state construction site permit requirements. Grading/Building Permit 23. Submit watershed district permit and copies of private maintenance agreement in favor of watershed. Grading/Building Permit Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 24. A SWPPP consistent with the State General Construction Site Stormwater Permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Constructability and Safety 25. Construction staging, traffic control, and pedestrian access plans will be required. Grading/Building Permit 26. Retaining walls over 4-ft in height require design by a structural engineer. Hydrostatic pressure from nearby rain gardens shall be accounted for. Grading/Building Permit Other Agency Coordination 27. Hennepin County, City of Minneapolis, MDH, MPCA and MCES permits required as needed. Grading/Building Permit 28. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Sustainability 29. Staff recommends considering EV charging infrastructure for residents. General Comment 30. The Metropolitan Council's Extreme Heat map shows that during an extreme heat event (when air temperatures are 90 or above), this area of Edina can be 4 degrees F hotter than surrounding areas. Green roofs reduce the urban heat island effect, reducing amount of greenhouse gas emissions trapped in the atmosphere and energy needs to cool a building. Staff recommends adding a green roof or garden to reduce this urban heat island effect and energy costs to cool the building. General Comment 31. The University of Minnesota's Solar Suitability map rates this property as "good" for solar roof installations with a grade of 83 out of 100. Staff recommends considering rooftop solar panels to maximize benefits of renewable energy. General Comment 32. Please complete marked “yes” items from Sustainable Design Questionnaire as described below: - utilize Xcel Energy’s Energy Design Assistance and/or Centerpoint Energy’s Builder and Developer programs for this development - appliances and equipment be Energy Star or EPA WaterSense certified - Rely on HERS rating system for energy design and construction strategies - Protect existing healthy trees General Comment - Provide shade trees, native and pollinator-friendly landscaping - outdoor landscaping watering system include a water sensor to automatically reduce watering in wet conditions - site features included to make the use of public transit convenient and simple? Examples include sheltered waiting areas, paved sidewalks and clear site lines September 16, 2021 Cary Teague, Community Development Director David Fisher, Chief Building Official 4630 France Ave – Villas on France Information / Background: Two separate single-family dwellings in a villa. - This would be an R-3 building using the International Residential Code. - A separate water and sewer service and permit are required for each unit. - I would recommend a 13-D Fire Sprinkler System in in each home. Provide the required size of the domestic water for each unit to ensure complies for the fire sprinkler system. - New address numbers will be required. - Recommend escrow is provided with the demo and new building permits to assure City standards are met for code compliance. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-88 DENYING PRELIMINARY REZONING FROM R-1, SINGLE-DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT TO PRD-2 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, PRELIMINARY PLAT, SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FROM 20 FEET TO 7 FEET AND 15 FEET, LOT SIZE VARIANCE FROM 7,300 SF TO 5,016 SF, REAR YARD SETBACK VARINACE FROM 35 FEET TO 25 FEET AND THE BUILIDNG COVERAGE VARIANCE FROM 25% TO 26% AT 4630 FRANCE AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 City Homes is proposing to tear down the existing single-family home and build two villa style homes at 4630 France Avenue. A shared driveway off France Avenue would provide access for both homes. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: Lot 005, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 172, Hennepin County Minnesota. 1.03 The property to the north contains a 4-unit townhome development zoned PRD-2, Planned Residential Development -2. The property to the south is a single-family home zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District. Further south are duplexes zoned R-2, Double Dwelling Unit District. 1.04 To accommodate the request the following is request: A Rezoning from R-1, Single-Dwelling Unit District to PRD-2 Planned Residential District 2. Preliminary Plat. Side yard setback variances from 20 feet to 7 feet and 15 feet. Rear yard setback variance from 35 feet to 25 feet. Building coverage variance from 25% to 26.3%. Lot size variance from 7,300 square feet to 5,016 square feet. 1.05 On September 22, 2021, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, the Side Yard Setback Variances, and the Lot Size Variance. The Commission further recommended denial of the rear yard setback variance and building coverage variance. Vote: 8 Ayes and 0 Nays. 1.06 On October 5, 2021 the City Council held a public hearing and considered the request. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-88 Page 2 Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Denial is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal does not meet the criteria for considering rezoning to PRD-2 in Section 36- 213 of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposed variances do not meet the findings for a variance. The proposed structures are too large for the site. 3. The proposed development is too large for the site and don’t fit with the character of the neighborhood in relationship with adjacent structures. 4. A duplex located closer to France Avenue would be more appropriate for the site, than constructing a housing behind a house. Section 3. DENIAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, denies the Preliminary Rezoning from R-1, Single-Dwelling Unit District to PRD-2 Planned Residential District, Preliminary Plat, side yard setback variance from 20 feet to 7 and 15 feet, lot size variance from 7,300 SF TO 5,016 SF, rear yard setback variance and building coverage variance at 4630 France Avenue, based on the findings above. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-88 Page 3 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on October 19, 2021. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 19, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2021. _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2021-88 APPROVING PRELIMINARY REZONING FROM R-1, SINGLE-DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT TO PRD-2 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, PRELIMINARY PLAT, SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FROM 20 FEET TO 7 FEET AND 15 FEET, LOT SIZE VARIANCE FROM 7,300 SF TO 5,016 SF AND DENIAL OF THE REAR YARD SETBACK VARINACE FROM 35 FEET TO 25 FEET AND THE BUILIDNG COVERAGE VARIANCE FROM 25% TO 26% AT 4630 FRANCE AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 City Homes is proposing to tear down the existing single-family home and build two villa style homes at 4630 France Avenue. A shared driveway off France Avenue would provide access for both homes. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: Lot 005, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 172, Hennepin County Minnesota. 1.03 The property to the north contains a 4-unit townhome development zoned PRD-2, Planned Residential Development -2. The property to the south is a single-family home zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District. Further south are duplexes zoned R-2, Double Dwelling Unit District. 1.04 To accommodate the request the following is request: A Rezoning from R-1, Single-Dwelling Unit District to PRD-2 Planned Residential District 2. Preliminary Plat. Side yard setback variances from 20 feet to 7 feet and 15 feet. Rear yard setback variance from 35 feet to 25 feet. Building coverage variance from 25% to 26.3%. Lot size variance from 7,300 square feet to 5,016 square feet. 1.05 On September 22, 2021, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, the Side Yard Setback Variances, and the Lot Size Variance. The Commission further recommended denial of the rear yard setback variance and building coverage variance. Vote: 8 Ayes and 0 Nays. 1.06 On October 5, 2021 the City Council held a public hearing and considered the request. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-88 Page 2 Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval of the Staff and Planning Commission recommendation (including the variance denials) is based on the following findings: 1. The practical difficulty is caused by the small size of the lot and narrow width. The proposed two lot development is the same as the 4-lot development to the north. Staff believes it is reasonable to development the subject lot in the same manner. 2. The requested rear yard setback and building coverage setbacks are not reasonable due to the large structure sizes. The size of the structures could be reduced and shifted to meet the rear yard setback and 25% building coverage requirement. The 35-foot rear yard setback provides a code compliant setback to the adjacent R-1 property to the west. 3. The proposed development is reasonable compared to the existing 4-lot attached residential development to the north. The proposed lot sizes are slightly larger than the existing lots to the north. The average lot size of the development to the north is 4,388 square feet in size, smaller than the proposed two lots. Proposed lots are 5,016 square feet in size. 4. There would be a 17-foot distance between the duplex to the north and the proposed home, and a 19-foot distance between the proposed home and the single-family home to the south. Within the City’s single-family residential areas with 50-foot-wide lots (Country Club and much of east Edina) the separation between single-family homes is often 10 feet. Therefore, staff believes the relationship between structures is reasonable. 5. The circumstance of this single-dwelling unit lot being guided as low density attached residential in the Comprehensive Plan and located adjacent to a PRD-2 zoning district is unique to the property and not common to the vast majority of the R-1 zoning district lots. 6. The variances would not alter the essential character of the district. The proposed homes would be located similar on the site than the located of the single family detached homes to the north that are also accessed by a shared driveway. 7. The proposal meets the criteria for considering rezoning in Section 36-213 of the Zoning Ordinance as outlined on page 5-6 of this staff report. Section 3. APPROVAL & DENIAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Preliminary Rezoning from R-1, Single-Dwelling Unit District to PRD-2 Planned Residential District, Preliminary Plat, side yard setback variance from 20 feet to 7 and 15 feet, lot size variance from 7,300 SF TO 5,016 SF; and denial of the rear yard setback variance and building coverage variance at 4630 France Avenue, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Plans and Final Plat must be adjusted to meet the following: RESOLUTION NO. 2020-88 Page 3 a. The rear yard setback for the structure on Lot 2 must meet the required setback of 35 feet. b. The overall building coverage may not exceed 25%. c. The front yard setback shall be no closer than 30 feet to the lot line on France Avenue. d. All revisions required in the engineering memo dated October 12, 2021. e. The Final Plat must include a 10-foot easement along France Avenue for Pedestrians and future sidewalk improvements. 2. Submittal of a construction management plan, including a tree protection plan subject to review and approval of city staff prior to issuance of a building permit. No dumpsters or construction material shall be stored in the street. 3. Hours of construction must be consistent with City Code. 4. Park Dedication of $5,000 due at the time of building permit. 5. A shared driveway and maintenance agreement/easement must be established over the share driveway. The easement must be filed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first structure. 6. A separate water and sewer service and permit are required for each unit. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-88 Page 4 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on October 19, 2021. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 19, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2021. _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk EdinaMN.gov 1 EdinaMN.gov 2 EdinaMN.gov 3 Site EdinaMN.gov 4 EdinaMN.gov 5 8 Site Comprehensive Land Use Plan The CITYofEDINAPreliminary Rezoning & Preliminary Development Plan with Variances for City Homes at 4630 France Avenue. The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov2 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov3 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov4Site The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov5 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov6 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov78 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov8 The CITYofEDINAApplicant RequestEdinaMN.gov9A Rezoning from R-1, Single-Dwelling Unit District to PRD-2 Planned Residential District 2.Preliminary Plat.Side yard setback variances from 20 feet to 7 feet and 15 feet.Rear yard setback variance from 35 feet to 25 feet. Building coverage variance from 25% to 26.3%.Lot size variance from 7,300 square feet to 5,016 square feet. The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov10Required Setbacks20’20’30’35’ The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov11Sketch Plan The CITYofEDINAPrimary IssuesIs the proposed Rezoning reasonable? Are the proposed variances reasonable?EdinaMN.gov12 The CITYofEDINAPrimary IssueIs the proposed Rezoning reasonable? EdinaMN.gov13Yes. Staff does support the revised rezoning of the site, for the following reasons: 1. The proposed Rezoning is consistent with the adjacent 4-lot development to the north which has the same PRD-2 Zoning Designation. 2. The proposed lots are similar in size to the 4-lot development to the north. The average lot size of the development to the north is 4,388 square feet in size, smaller than the proposed two lots. Proposed lots are 5,016 square feet in size. The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov14Site The CITYofEDINAPrimary IssueIs the proposed Rezoning reasonable? EdinaMN.gov15 3. The relationship and spacing between adjacent structures is reasonable. There would be a 17-foot distance between the duplex to the north and the proposed home, and a 19-foot distance between the proposed home and the single-family home to the south. Within the City’s single-family residential areas with 50-foot-wide lots (Country Club and much of east Edina) the separation between single-family homes is often 10 feet. 4. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 5. The proposal meets the criteria for considering rezoning in Section 36-213 of the Zoning Ordinance as outlined on page 5-6 of this staff report. The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov16Building Separation19’17’ The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov17 The CITYofEDINAPrimary IssuesAre the proposed variances reasonable?EdinaMN.gov18 The CITYofEDINAPrimary IssuesAre the proposed variances reasonable?EdinaMN.gov19Yes. Staff does support the side yard setback variances and the lot size variances for the following reasons: 1. The practical difficulty is caused by the small size of the lot and narrow width. The proposed two lot development is the same as the 4-lot development to the north. Staff believes it is reasonable to development the subject lot in the same manner. 2. The requested rear yard setback and building coverage setbacks are not reasonable due to the large structure sizes. The size of the structures could be reduced and shifted to meet the rear yard setback and 25% building coverage requirement. The 35-foot rear yard setback provides a code compliant setback to the adjacent R-1 property to the west. 3. The proposed development is reasonable compared to the existing 4-lot detached single-dwelling unit development to the north. The proposed lot sizes are slightly larger than the existing lots to the north. The average lot size of the development to the north is 4,388 square feet in size, smaller than the proposed two lots. Proposed lots are 5,016 square feet in size. The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov20Required Setbacks20’20’30’35’ The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov2111’ The CITYofEDINAPrimary IssuesAre the proposed variances reasonable?EdinaMN.gov22in size. 4. The circumstance of this single-dwelling unit lot being guided as low density attached residential in the Comprehensive Plan and located adjacent to a PRD-2 zoning district is unique to the property and not common to the vast majority of the R-1 zoning district lots. 5. The variance would not alter the essential character of the district. The proposed homes would be located similar on the site than the located of the single family detached homes to the north that are also accessed by a shared driveway. The CITYofEDINABetter TogetherEdinaMN.gov23 The CITYofEDINARecommendationEdinaMN.gov24 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov25 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov26 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov27 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov28 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov29 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov30 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov31 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov32 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov33 EdinaMN.gov 1 25’ 5’ 5’ An R-1, Code Compliant Maximum Sized Building Pad –(Setting home as far away from France Avenue as possible) Building pad is 2,470 s.f. EdinaMN.gov 2 An R-1, Code Compliant Maximum Sized Building Pad –(Setting home as close to France Avenue as possible) 48’ 5’ 5’ Building pad is 2,470 s.f. DATE: 10/12/2021 TO: 4630 France Ave, City Homes and Simply Homes CC: Cary Teague – Community Development Director FROM: Chad Millner, PE, Director of Engineering RE: 4630 France Ave – Development Review, Revision 1 The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for pedestrian facilities, utility connections, grading, flood risk, and storm water. Plans reviewed included an existing survey, preliminary plat, and stormwater management plan revised 10/4/21. Review Comment Required For General 1. Deliver as-build records of public and private utility infrastructure post construction. Certificate of Occupancy Survey 2. An existing and proposed site condition survey is required. Grading/Building Permit 2.1 Show all existing and proposed public and private easements. Grading/Building Permit Living Streets 3. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. Grading/Building Permit 4. Saw cut concrete sidewalk joints on public sidewalks. Grading/Building Permit 5. Public sidewalk to match existing. Grading/Building Permit Traffic and Street 6. Review fire access requirements with fire department. Fire truck turning template attached. Grading/Building Permit 7. Hennepin County Access Permit required for entrance reconstruction. Building Permit 8. Road patching shall conform to Hennepin County standards. Certificate of Occupancy 9. Provide 10’ easement along eastern side of property for future sidewalk improvements. Limit trees, plantings and landscaping items within the easement. Rain garden shall not encroach. Grading/Building Permit Sanitary and Water Utilities 10. Served by City of Minneapolis. City of Minneapolis utility permits required. Grading/Building Permit 11. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 12. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 13. A SAC determination will be required by the Metropolitan Council. The SAC determination will be used by the City to calculate sewer and water connection charges Grading/Building Permit 14. A well may be located onsite. MDH to provide documentation as available. A licensed well contractor may be required to search the site for a well. Wells not in use must be sealed by a licensed well contractor per MN Rules, Chapter 4725. Certificate of Occupancy Storm Water Utility 15. Site drains to landlocked basins (MHN_65 and 66), a structural flooding issue (MHN_66), and private property (MHN_65). Demonstrate no increase in peak flood elevations for 1% annual chance flood event (NOAA Atlas 14, 100-year), volume control (1.1”x new contributing impervious), and rate control to private property (NOAA Atlas 14, 10-year). Provide revised existing and proposed hydrocad to confirm. Grading/Building Permit 16. The Minnesota Stormwater Manual recommends 10’ as the minimum distance between an infiltration practice and a structure’s foundation. Eastern rain garden within 10’ based on EOF elevation. Revise. Grading/Building Permit 17. Western rain garden’s overflow creates a new concentration of drainage that will affect downstream structures. Revise design to eliminate new concentration of drainage. Grading/Building Permit 18. Mitigation is distributed unevenly between the two sites. Revise to proportionally distribute mitigation per site. Split stormwater management per lot. Recommend engineered pervious driveway with drains to direct overflow to street. Grading/Building Permit 19. Indicate the rain garden responsibility maintenance. Grading/Building Permit 20. Proposed lowest floors (904.93’) are above the required FEMA 1% annual chance 875.5’ with more than 2’ of freeboard. General Comment 21. Provide geotechnical report with soil borings. Grading/Building Permit 22. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report meeting watershed and state construction site permit requirements. Grading/Building Permit 23. Submit watershed district permit and copies of private maintenance agreement in favor of watershed. Grading/Building Permit Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 24. A SWPPP consistent with the State General Construction Site Stormwater Permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Constructability and Safety 25. Construction staging, traffic control, and pedestrian access plans will be required. Grading/Building Permit 26. Retaining walls over 4-ft in height require design by a structural engineer. Hydrostatic pressure from nearby rain gardens shall be accounted for. Grading/Building Permit Other Agency Coordination 27. Hennepin County, City of Minneapolis, MDH, MPCA and MCES permits required as needed. Grading/Building Permit 28. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Sustainability 29. Staff recommends considering EV charging infrastructure for residents. General Comment 30. The Metropolitan Council's Extreme Heat map shows that during an extreme heat event (when air temperatures are 90 or above), this area of Edina can be 4 degrees F hotter than surrounding areas. Green roofs reduce the urban heat island effect, reducing amount of greenhouse gas emissions trapped in the atmosphere and energy needs to cool a building. Staff recommends adding a green roof or garden to reduce this urban heat island effect and energy costs to cool the building. General Comment 31. The University of Minnesota's Solar Suitability map rates this property as "good" for solar roof installations with a grade of 83 out of 100. Staff recommends considering rooftop solar panels to maximize benefits of renewable energy. General Comment 32. Please complete marked “yes” items from Sustainable Design Questionnaire as described below: - utilize Xcel Energy’s Energy Design Assistance and/or Centerpoint Energy’s Builder and Developer programs for this development - appliances and equipment be Energy Star or EPA WaterSense certified - Rely on HERS rating system for energy design and construction strategies - Protect existing healthy trees General Comment - Provide shade trees, native and pollinator-friendly landscaping - outdoor landscaping watering system include a water sensor to automatically reduce watering in wet conditions - site features included to make the use of public transit convenient and simple? Examples include sheltered waiting areas, paved sidewalks and clear site lines s i m p l y h o m e s i n c 0 10 205 35’31’ • 30’ • s i m p l y h o m e s i n c 0 10 205 72’30’ Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.I. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-89: Site Plan Review with Variances at 6500 Barrie Road Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt resolution No. 2021-89 approving the Site Plan with Variances per the P lanning Commission recommendation. INTRODUCTION: On September 22, 2021, the P lanning Commission recommended approval of the requests and added the following conditions: Relocate or reconfigure the entrance on the corner of 65th and Barrie to be more prominent; extend the sidewalk on 65th to the lot line; and Increase the parking variance to accommodate a second drive entrance on Barrie Road rather than one on 65th Street. Vote: 7 Ayes and 1 Nay. The applicant has revised their plans to accommodate recommendations of the planning commission. (See attached revised narrative and plans.) The City Council is asked to consider a re-development proposal to tear down the existing 16,032 square foot medical office building and build a new 3-story, 24,000 square foot medical office and surgery center. (See applicant narrative and plans.) The site is currently zoned P OD-1, P lanned Office District, and guided Regional Medical District. The height overlay district allows up to 12 stories. The site is very small (30,492 square feet), and narrow (100 feet wide) for a medical office site. Given the required setbacks on the site, a variance would be likely for any new structure. To accommodate the request the following is required: Site Plan Review. Front Street (65th) Setback Variance from 30 feet to 18 feet on the north lot line (measured from the front of the building to the curb). Side Yard Setback Variance from 20 feet to 10 feet. Building Coverage Variance from 30% to 45%. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Variance from 50% to 80%. Parking Stall Variance from 120 stalls to 72 stalls. ATTACHMENTS: Description Better Together Report 10-11-21 Noon Planning Commission Staff Report and Staff Memos Resolution No. 2021-89 Site Location, Zoning, & Comp. Plan Applicant Narrative Revised Parking Plan Traffic and Parking Study Proposed Plans 1 of 3 Proposed Plans 2 of 3 Proposed Plans 3 of 3 Review comments from AFO (Mic Johnson) Revised Plan - Per the Planning Commission Recommendations Revised Narrative - Addressing the Planning Commission Recommendations Staff Presentation Survey Responses 30 January 2019 - 11 October 2021 Public Hearing Comments-6500 Barrie Rd. Better Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: Bhatti G.I. Consultant, P.A. is proposing to tear down the existing 16,032 square foot medical office building at 6500 Barrie Road, and build a new 3-story, 24,000 square foot medical office and surgery center. VISITORS 3 CONTRIBUTORS 2 RESPONSES 2 0 Registered 0 Unverified 2 Anonymous 0 Registered 0 Unverified 2 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Sep 19, 2021 05:55:36 am Last Seen:Sep 19, 2021 05:55:36 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Eric Snyder Q2.Address 6305 Colony Way. Edina, MN Q3.Comment It appears that at least four trees will be removed along W 65th St. The drawing shows at least three replacement trees. However, the distance between the sidewalk and trees appear very small. 1. Is that distance enough to allow the replacement trees room to grow and prosper? 2. Are the replacement trees included as a requirement for the setback variance? My feedback is that there should be equal or similar replacement trees with equal long term viability as the current trees as a condition of approving the variance. I am otherwise pleased with the building design. Respondent No:2 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Sep 29, 2021 03:24:18 am Last Seen:Sep 29, 2021 03:24:18 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Joseph B. Cassidy, III Q2.Address 6481 Barrie Rd Q3.Comment My only concern would be on a traffic aspect, as there is a moderate degree of traffic already, especially during the morning and evening rush hours. Most of the traffic at these times would be traveling to and from the hospital and existing clinics already present. I need to know how this would be handled. September 22, 2021 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Site Plan Review with Variances – 6500 Barrie Road. Information / Background: The Planning Commission is asked to consider and make recommendation to the City Council on a proposal to tear down the existing 16,032 square foot medical office building and build a new 3- story, 24,000 square foot medical office and surgery center. (See applicant narrative and plans.) The site is currently zoned POD-1, Planned Office District, and guided Regional Medical District. The height overlay district allows up to 12 stories. (See attached location, zoning, comp. plan and height overlay zone.) The site is very small (30,492 square feet), and narrow (100 feet wide) for a medical office site. Given the required setbacks on the site, a variance would be likely for any new structure. The table on the following page demonstrates proposed setbacks. To accommodate the request the following is required: ¾ Site Plan Review. ¾ Front Street (65th) Setback Variance from 30 feet to 18 feet on the north lot line (measured from the front of the building to the curb). ¾ Side Yard Setback Variance from 20 feet to 10 feet. ¾ Building Coverage Variance from 30% to 45%. ¾ Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Variance from 50% to 80%. ¾ Parking Stall Variance from 120 stalls to 73 stalls. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: The Colony, three story condominiums; zoned PRD-4, Planned Residential District and guided Regional Medical Easterly: Single-story office and medical office; zoned POD-1, Planned Office District and guided Regional Medical STAFF REPORT Page 2 Southerly: Four-story medical office building; zoned POD-1, Planned Office District and guided Regional Medical Westerly: Large surface parking lot for medical office; zoned POD-1, Planned Office District and guided Regional Medical Existing Site Features The subject property is 30,286 square feet in size and contains a medical office building with parking under the building. Planning Guide Plan designation: RM, Regional Medical Zoning: POD-1, Planned Office District Site Access The primary access to the site would be off Barrie Road, and a new access provided off 65th Street West. Parking As mentioned above, a parking space variance is requested to accommodate the required number of parking spaces for the site. Based on the square footage of the facility 120 parking spaces are required for the entire site. (Under the proposed parking ordinance revisions, 80 stalls would be required.) The proposed plans demonstrate 73 parking stalls. (Plans were revised to add three stalls.) Wenck Associates completed a parking study for the use. (See attached study.) The study concludes that there would be adequate parking. Traffic Wenck Associates also completed a traffic study for the use. (See attached study.) The study concludes that the existing roadways would support the project. Per City requirements, a Tier 2 Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan is required for this project. TDM strategies for this site include: x Providing maps that show the area bus routes, bus schedules, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. x Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. x Providing bicycle parking spaces for employees. x Offering a pre-paid Metro Transit Go-To Card to all employees during orientation. The TDM plan strategies should be implemented at the time the project is complete and fully operational. The overall cost of the strategies is estimated at $1,000. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Landscaping The existing landscaping exceeds the City’s requirements. Based on the perimeter of the site, 19 over story trees and a full complement of understory trees and shrubs are required. The site contains 20 proposed over story trees around the site & a full complement of understory trees and shrubs. Building Materials The proposed building would be made primarily of brick, glass and metal panel. (See attached building plans.) Signage Any proposed signage must meet the City’s sign ordinance, and not to exceed 86 square feet total and no individual sign larger than 50 square feet. Setback must be 20 feet back from the street. The following table demonstrates compliance with POD-1 Zoning: COMPLIANCE TABLE City Standard (POD-1) Proposed Structure Setbacks Front – 65th Street Front – Barrie Road Side – West Rear – South 30 feet to the curb 30 feet to the curb 20 feet 20 feet 18 feet to the curb* (10 feet to lot line) 35 feet (25 feet to lot line) 10 feet* 50 feet Height 12 stories and 144 feet 3 stories and 40 feet Floor Area Ratio (FAR) .50% (.53 existing) .80 s.f.* Building Coverage 30% (28% existing) 45% Parking 1 stall per 200 s.f. plus one space per physician = 120 stalls (1 per 300 s.f. proposed Ord) = 80 stalls 73 stalls* *Variance Required STAFF REPORT Page 4 Variance – Parking Stalls Per the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. “Practical difficulties” may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed parking stall variance is reasonable. A parking study was conducted by Wenck Associates that demonstrates that the use would be supported by the 73 parking stalls that are proposed. The plans originally called for 70 stalls. As a result of the parking study, the parking area was revised to accommodate the three stalls that were short. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? Yes. The site is unique in terms of its size and shape. The city is in the process of amending the zoning ordinance in regard to the number of parking spaces required for medical uses. Under the proposed ordinance, the proposal would only be short parked by 7 spaces. The parking study has demonstrated that the 73 spaces would be adequate to accommodate the proposed use. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The variance would not alter the essential character of the district. There are a variety of building sizes and height in this neighborhood, and there are a variety of ways the uses are parked including surface lots and ramps. The reduction in parking would not be noticed in the neighborhood. Variances – Setbacks & Building Size This section considers the following variances: front street setback variance from 30 feet to 18 feet (measured from building to curb); side yard setback variance from 20 feet to 10 feet; building coverage variance from 30% to 45%; floor area ratio (FAR) variance from 50% to 80%. STAFF REPORT Page 5 Per the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. “Practical difficulties” may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed variances mentioned above are reasonable. The practical difficulty is caused by the small size of the lot and narrow width. The proposed building is slightly larger than the existing building on the site. Given the property values in this area, the proposed building is reasonably sized, and far below the maximum height allowed for the site. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? Yes. This lot is the narrowest in the district. The lot to the south that is the same size is held in common ownership with the larger property to the west. The circumstance of the small lot size and narrow width are not common in this area and zoning district. These circumstances were not created by the applicant. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The variance would not alter the essential character of the district. There are a variety of building sizes and height in this neighborhood. The building would still be one of the small structures in the area. There is a large surface parking lot to the south and to the west, which would make the building appear to be located on a larger lot. STAFF REPORT Page 6 PRIMARY ISSUE/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issue x Is the proposal reasonable to justify the proposed variances? Yes. Staff does support the site plan and the requested variances on the site for the following reasons: 1. The Wenck parking study demonstrates there would be adequate parking to support the project. 2. The proposed setback, building coverage and floor area ratio variances are reasonable. The practical difficulty is caused by the small size of the lot and narrow width. 3. The proposed building is slightly larger than the existing building on the site. Given the property values in this area, the proposed building is reasonably sized, and far below the maximum height allowed for the site. 4. This lot is the narrowest in the district. The lot to the south that is the same width is held in common ownership with the larger property to the west. Therefore, the circumstance of the small lot size and narrow width are not common in this area and zoning district. These circumstances were not created by the applicant. 5. The variance would not alter the essential character of the district. There are a variety of building sizes and height in this neighborhood. The building would still be one of the smallest structures in the area. There is a large surface parking lot to the south and to the west, which would make the building appear to be located on a larger lot. 6. The proposed sidewalk would be an improvement to the area where there are currently no sidewalks. This sidewalk would allow residents to the north to walk to Southdale and surrounding area more safely. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Site Plan with Variances at 6500 Barrie Road. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Wenck conducted a parking and traffic impact study. The study concluded that the existing roadway system would support the proposed project. No improvements are necessary to the adjacent roadway. Additionally, the proposed 73 parking spaces provided would adequately serve the development. 2. The building is reasonably sized given the context of the immediate area and neighborhood. STAFF REPORT Page 7 3. The practical difficulty is due to the narrow lot width and small area of the lot. 4. The project would improve pedestrian movement in the area with the construction of the boulevard style sidewalks. 5. The proposed building is slightly larger than the existing building on the site. Given the property values in this area, the proposed building is reasonably sized, and far below the maximum height allowed for the site. 6. Consider the recommendations of Mic Johnson, Architecture Field Office in the review memo dated September 16, 2021. Approval of the Site Plan is subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: x Site plan dated August 20, 2021. x Grading plan dated August 20, 2021. x Building elevations dated August 20, 2021. x Landscape plans dated August 20, 2021. x Utility plans dated August 20, 2021 x Building materials plans dated August 20, 2021. 2. If required, submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 3. Per City requirements, a Tier 2 Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan is required for this project. TDM strategies for this site include: x Providing maps that show the area bus routes, bus schedules, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. x Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. x Providing bicycle parking spaces for employees. x Offering a pre-paid Metro Transit Go-To Card to all employees during orientation. The TDM plan strategies should be implemented at the time the project is complete and fully operational. 4. Public sidewalk to be minimum 5 feet in width with a 5-foot boulevard extended to property line on both 65th Street and Barrie Road. Sidewalks to be maintained by the property owner, including snow plowing. 5. Provide 6 bicycle parking stalls (minimum) on site (5% of the required parking per City Code). These stalls should be in convenient, well-lit locations within 50’ of a public entrance to the building. Rack style and spacing should follow the recommendations of the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (APBP). STAFF REPORT Page 8 6. Compliance with the conditions required in the engineering memo dated September 14, 2021, including the items marked “yes” in the sustainability questionnaire. 7. Compliance with the building official’s memo dated September 16, 2021. 8. Any proposed signage must meet the City’s sign ordinance. Deadline for a city decision: December 7, 2021 September 16, 2021 Cary Teague, Community Development Director David Fisher, Chief Building Official 6500 Barrie Rd – 2 stories of parking and 2 stories of office Information / Background: New 2 stories of parking and 2 stories of office - This would be an S-1 parking and R-2 residential apartment building using the 2020 Minnesota State Building Code & Fire Code. - Provide a complete Build Code analysis with plans when submitting for the building permit. - An NFPA 13 Fire Sprinkler System is required. - Verify fire hydrant location by the main entry. - Verify Fire Department access. - Verify there is adequate assessable parking. - Verify noise ordinance is complying and is understood. Working Hours: Monday – Friday 7 A.M. to 7 P.M. Saturdays – 9A.M. to 5 P.M. Sundays and Holidays – No Work Allowed - Recommend a meeting with staff for 30, 60 and 90 percent before submitting for building permit. DATE: 9/14/2021 TO: 6500 Barrie Rd , Owner and Development Team CC: Cary Teague – Community Development Director FROM: Chad Millner, PE, Director of Engineering RE: 6500 Barrie Rd – Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for pedestrian facilities, utility connections, grading, flood risk, and storm water. Plans reviewed included civil, landscape, and survey drawings dated August 2021. Review Comment Required For General 1. Deliver as-build records of public and private utility infrastructure post construction. Certificate of Occupancy 2. Indicate the location for snow storage and removal plan for garage access locations. Snow may not be stored in the public ROW. General Comment Survey 3. An existing and proposed site condition survey is required. Grading/Building Permit 3.1 Show all existing and proposed public and private easements. Grading/Building Permit Living Streets 4. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. Grading/Building Permit 5. Saw cut concrete sidewalk joints on public sidewalks. Grading/Building Permit 6. Public sidewalk to be minimum 5’ in width with a 5’ boulevard extended to property line on both 65th Street and Barrie Road. Sidewalks to be maintained by the property owner, including snow plowing. Grading/Building Permit 7. Provide 6 bicycle parking stalls (minimum) on site (5% of the required parking per City Code). These stalls should be in convenient, well-lit locations within 50’ of a public entrance to the building. Rack style and spacing should follow the recommendations of the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (APBP). Grading/Building Permit 8. Engage Metro Transit regarding the southbound bus stop for Express Route 578 on Barrie Road north of the project site. If General Comment desired by Metro Transit, consider relocating the stop onto this site and provide enhanced amenities like a bench or shelter. Traffic and Street 9. Review fire access requirements with fire department. Fire truck turning template attached. Size and distance from street may not require onsite fire access. Grading/Building Permit 10. Provide traffic study and implement City-approved recommendations. Grading/Building Permit 11. Driveway Entrance permit required for entrance relocation and curb and gutter work. Proposing to remove three and install two. Note, 50’ minimum separation between driveway entrance and intersection return. Building Permit 12. Add reference to standard plate 415 on sheet C5.0. Note, maximum width for two-way entrances is 30’. Revise north entrance width; currently shown at 42’ wide. Grading/Building Permit 13. Damage to Barrie Rd shall be repaired per standard plates 540 and 545. Street reconstruction is scheduled for 2023. 65th St W was milled and overlaid in 2011 and shall be repaired. Certificate of Occupancy 14. Proposing to remove City light pole at NW corner. Work with electrical supervisor on replacement requirements. Grading/Building Permit 15. Traffic study recommends keeping the northeast corner of the site free of obstructions such as signs, trees or other landscaping to maintain clear sight lines for vehicles. All proposed trees, vegetation, signage and other items adjacent to the intersections and driveway accesses should maintain a clear view as defined in Section 26-190 of City Code. Grading/Building Permit 16. Implement strategies (3 minimum) identified in Tier 2 Travel Demand Management Plan; 1. Provide maps that show the area bus routes, bus schedules, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. 2. Provide information on starting and joining commuter programs. 3. Provide bicycle parking spaces for employees. 4. Offer a pre-paid Metro Transit Go-To Card to all employees during orientation. Other strategies recommended by staff include; 1. Provide indoor bike parking/lockers for employees. 2. Provide maps and information on the City’s CloverRide circulator bus. Certificate of Occupancy 3. Designate parking stalls for car sharing services (i.e. HourCar, Zipcar). Sanitary and Water Utilities 17. Verify fire demand and hydrant locations. Grading/Building Permit 18. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 19. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 20. Apply for a sewer and water connection permit with Public Works. Prior to Starting Utility Work 20.1 Meter required for building service line and combined lines. No meter required for fire only service line. Grading/Building Permit 20.2 Public Works to determine acceptable installation methods. Grading/Building Permit 21. Disconnected sanitary and water services to be capped at main. 22. A SAC determination will be required by the Metropolitan Council. The SAC determination will be used by the City to calculate sewer and water connection charges Grading/Building Permit 23. Single connection from main for fire and domestic, split after main connection. Grading/Building Permit 24. Watermain installed 1961. Structure built 1971. A well is likely not located onsite. Contact MDH and the City of Edina should one be discovered during the project. Storm Water Utility 25. Provide geotechnical report with soil borings. Grading/Building Permit 26. A local 1% annual chance flood plain (883.5’) is located just west of the property. Lowest opening is required at no less than 885.5’. Indicate the lowest opening elevation. Per grading plan sheet C3.0, below grade parking entrances appear to be less than the required lowest opening elevation. Grading/Building Permit 27. Construction of below-grade parking garages in local flood is permitted, provided the structure (including the parking garage) is flood proofed to two feet above 883.5’ in accordance with the following design standards: a. Together with associated utility and sanitary facilities, the structure must be designed so that below two feet above 883.5’ the structure is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water and with structural components having the capability of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy. Grading/Building Permit b. A Floodproofing Certificate and Inspection and Maintenance Plan must be provided by a registered professional engineer or architect. c. A floodproofing design that entails human intervention, such as the installation of flood gates or flood shields, will require a Flood Emergency Operation Plan. 28. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report meeting watershed and state construction site permit requirements. Grading/Building Permit 29. Total site impervious reduced from existing to proposed condition. Provide drainage area maps and calculations to confirm impervious draining to private is also reduced. Grading/Building Permit 30. Submit watershed district permit and copies of private maintenance agreement in favor of watershed as required. Grading/Building Permit Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 31. A SWPPP consistent with the State General Construction Site Stormwater Permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Constructability and Safety 32. Construction staging, traffic control, and pedestrian access plans will be required. Note, no parking along Barrie Rd and 65th St W. Apply for lane/road closure permits with Public Works as needed. Grading/Building Permit 33. Retaining walls over 4-ft in height require design by a structural engineer. Grading/Building Permit Other Agency Coordination 34. MDH, MPCA and MCES permits required as needed. Grading/Building Permit 35. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit is required. Grading/Building Permit 36. Coordinate relocation of private utility pedestals for proposed sidewalk. Sustainability 37. Staff recommends installing EV chargers for a minimum of 5% of proposed parking (4 stalls) in addition to wiring 10% (7 stalls) for EV conversion in the future. General Comment 38. The Metropolitan Council's Extreme Heat map shows that during an extreme heat event (when air temperatures are 90 or above), this area of Edina can be 4-9 degrees F hotter than surrounding areas. Green roofs reduce the urban heat island effect, reducing General Comment amount of greenhouse gas emissions trapped in the atmosphere and energy needs to cool a building. Staff recommends adding a green roof or garden to reduce this urban heat island effect and energy costs to cool the building. 39. The University of Minnesota's Solar Suitability map rates this property as "good" for solar roof installations with a grade of 83 out of 100. Staff recommends considering rooftop solar panels to maximize benefits of renewable energy. General Comment 40. Please complete marked “yes” items from Sustainable Design Questionnaire as described below: - utilize Xcel Energy’s Energy Design Assistance and/or Centerpoint Energy’s Builder and Developer programs for this development - all appliances and equipment be Energy Star or EPA WaterSense certified - shade trees be provided along roadways, drives and surface parking areas beyond those required by code - native plantings be used in the landscaping - landscaping include pollinator-friendly varieties - scrap and excess construction materials being separated and recycled - outdoor landscaping watering system include a water sensor to automatically reduce watering in wet conditions - workers provided with separate recycling dumpsters and training in proper use - recycling service provided on site - future users of the building be provided with education and training regarding proper recycling practices - site features included to make the use of public transit convenient and simple General Comment RESOLUTION NO. 2021-89 APPROVING A SITE PLAN REVIEW WITH VARIANCES AT 6500 BARRIE ROAD FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW MEDICAL OFFICE AND SURGERY CENTER BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 The applicant is proposing tear down the existing 16,032 square foot medical office building and build a new 3-story, 24,000 square foot medical office and surgery center. 1.02 The site is currently zoned POD-1, Planned Office District, and guided Regional Medical District. The height overlay district allows up to 12 stories. The site is very small (30,492 square feet), and narrow (100 feet wide) for a medical office site. Given the required setbacks on the site, a variance would be likely for any new structure. 1.03 To accommodate the request the following is required: Site Plan Review. Front Street (65th) Setback Variance from 30 feet to 18 feet on the north lot line (measured from the front of the building to the curb). Side Yard Setback Variance from 20 feet to 10 feet. Building Coverage Variance from 30% to 45%. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Variance from 50% to 80%. Parking Stall Variance from 120 stalls to 73 stalls. 1.04 The property is legally described as follows: Lot 5, Block 4, Southdale Acres Addition, Hennepin County, Minn. 1.05 On September 22, 2021 after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. Motion to approve with conditions passed. Vote: 7 Ayes and 1 Nays. 1.06 The applicant revised the proposed plans to meet the additional recommendations of the Planning Commission including relocated the main entrance, extending the sidewalk on 65th Street and eliminating the drive entrance on 65th Street. 1.07 On October 5, the City Council held a public hearing and considered the request. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: RESOLUTION NO. 2021-89 Page 2 1. Wenck conducted a parking and traffic impact study. The study concluded that the existing roadway system would support the proposed project. No improvements are necessary to the adjacent roadway. Additionally, the proposed 73 parking spaces provided would adequately serve the development. 2. The building is reasonably sized given the context of the immediate area and neighborhood. 3. The practical difficulty is due to the narrow lot width and small area of the lot. 4. The project would improve pedestrian movement in the area with the construction of the boulevard style sidewalks. 5. The proposed building is slightly larger than the existing building on the site. Given the property values in this area, the proposed building is reasonably sized, and far below the maximum height allowed for the site. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Site Plan and the requested Variances based on the findings above and subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: Site plan dated August 20, 2021. Grading plan dated August 20, 2021. Building elevations dated August 20, 2021. Landscape plans dated August 20, 2021. Utility plans dated August 20, 2021. Building materials plans dated August 20, 2021. The revised plans presented to the City Council on October 5, 2021. 2. If required, submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 3. Per City requirements, a Tier 2 Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan is required for this project. TDM strategies for this site include: Providing maps that show the area bus routes, bus schedules, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. Providing bicycle parking spaces for employees. Offering a pre-paid Metro Transit Go-To Card to all employees during orientation. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-89 Page 3 The TDM plan strategies should be implemented at the time the project is complete and fully operational. 4. Public sidewalk to be minimum 5 feet in width with a 5-foot boulevard extended to property line on both 65th Street and Barrie Road. Sidewalks to be maintained by the property owner, including snow plowing. 5. Provide 6 bicycle parking stalls (minimum) on site (5% of the required parking per City Code). These stalls should be in convenient, well-lit locations within 50’ of a public entrance to the building. Rack style and spacing should follow the recommendations of the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (APBP). 6. Compliance with the conditions required in the engineering memo dated September 14, 2021, including the items marked “yes” in the sustainability questionnaire. 7. Compliance with the building official’s memo dated September 16, 2021. 8. Any proposed signage must meet the City’s sign ordinance. 9. Consider the recommendations of Mic Johnson, Architecture Field Office in the review memo dated September 16, 2021. 10. Relocate or add and reconfigure the exterior pedestrian entrance to be more prominent on the corner of 65th and Barrie. 11. Improve the pedestrian experience by extending the sidewalk to the property line on 65th Street. 12. Increase the parking variance to accommodate the second drive entrance on Barrie Road rather than one on 65th Street. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-89 Page 4 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on October 19, 2021. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 19, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2021. _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk EdinaMN.gov 1 Sit e EdinaMN.gov 2 Site EdinaMN.gov 3 Sit e 08/20/2021 Cary Teague Community Development Director, City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Site Plan Submittal - Project Narrative PROJECT: Bhatti G.I. Consultant, P.A. Medical Office Building and Surgery Center 6500 Barrie Road, Edina, MN 55435 Project Team: Developer MSP Commercial 1215 Town Centre Drive Eagan, MN 55123 Contact: Alex Young, President Phone: (651) 287-8891 Email: ayoung@MSPCommercial.net Design Team / Architecture Pope Architects, Inc. 1295 Bandana Boulevard N. Suite 200 St. Paul, MN 55108-2735 Contact: Don Rolf, AIA, Senior Project Manager Phone: (651) 789-1628 Email: drolf@popearch.com Property Owner Bhatti G.I. Consultants, P.A. 1447 White Oak Drive Chaska, MN 55318 Contact: Dr. Ahsan Bhatti Phone: 952-361-3800 The intended use of this property is to remove the existing outdated structure and provide a new Class A type medical office building within the existing POD 1 zoning district. The proposed site layout will increase the overall greenspace and provides a generous amount of landscape. The project also introduces a pedestrian sidewalk along Barrie Road and 65th Street to improve pedestrian circulation and safety. The building aesthetics will comprise of finish materials as outlined in the city ordinance for this zoned district. We are asking for your approval of this project that would allow Bhatti G.I. Consultants, P.A. to offer healthcare services to the communities within the city of Edina. Pope Architects, founded in 1974, is an architecture and interior design firm of creative professionals together shaping environments that enhance lives. The firm has a diverse practice encompassing work in Senior Living, Multi-Family Housing, Workplace, Industrial, Healthcare, Education, Worship and Community markets. Bhatti GI Consultants Edina, MN 08/20/2021 Page 2 Similar Projects: Summit Orthopedics Surgery Centers and Clinics: Lakeville, MN Woodbury, MN Eagan, MN Mercy Specialty Center, Coon Rapids, MN Aris Clinic, Woodbury, MN VA Clinic, Shakopee, MN Please contact me through email or 612-209-3042 with any comments or questions. I look forward to hearing from you. Don Rolf, AIA, GGP Senior Project Manager 37 STALLS HANDICAP HANDICAP HANDICAP 36 STALLS File #227704227 September 15, 2021 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Maple Plain, MN 55359 Phone: 7963-479-4200 Fax: 763-479-4242 Prepared for: City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Traffic and Parking Study for 6500 Barrie Road in Edina, MN September 2021 i Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................... I 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................... 1-1 2.0 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND ........................................................... 2-1 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................... 3-1 4.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTS ........................................................................ 4-1 5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................... 5-1 6.0 PARKING ANALYSIS ......................................................................... 6-1 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................... 7-1 8.0 APPENDIX ........................................................................................ 8-1 FIGURES FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................. 2-2 FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN ................................................................................ 2-3 FIGURE 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................. 3-3 FIGURE 4 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES .......................................... 4-3 FIGURE 5 WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES ........................................... 4-4 FIGURE 6 WEEKDAY AM LOS RESULTS ...................................................... 5-5 FIGURE 7 WEEKDAY PM LOS RESULTS ...................................................... 5-6 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. __________________________________ DATE: September 15, 2021 Edward F. Terhaar License No. 24441 September 2021 1-1 1.0 Executive Summary The purpose of this Traffic and Parking Study is to evaluate the impacts of a proposed new medical office building located at 6500 Barrie Road in Edina, MN. The project site is located in the southwest quadrant of the Barrie Road/W. 65th Street intersection. The proposed project location is currently occupied by a medical office building and parking lot. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development at the following intersections: • W. 66th Street/Barrie Road • W. 65th Street/Barrie Road • France Avenue/W. 65th Street • France Avenue/W. 66th Street • York Avenue/W. 66th Street • W. 65th Street/proposed access • Barrie Road/proposed access The proposed project will involve removal of the existing building and constructing a new 23,320 square foot medical office building. The project includes 73 underground parking stalls. As shown in the site plan, one access point is provided on W. 65th Street and one on Barrie Road. The project is expected to be completed by the end of 2022. The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to generate 20 net trips during the a.m. peak hour, 26 net trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 254 net trips daily. • The proposed project is expected to have minimal impact on the surrounding roadway system during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. No improvements are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. • Traffic volume data collected in 2018 for previous studies in this area was used whenever possible to avoid traffic volume reductions that have occurred due to the COVID-19 pandemic impacts. However, some intersections included in the study did not have previous data and therefore new data was collected. This data was carefully reviewed and adjusted using data from nearby intersections to account for pandemic related traffic volume reductions. This process resulted in reasonable estimates for the weekday peak hours that would occur under non-pandemic conditions. • Future plans for this area include adding sidewalk on both Barrie Road and 65th Street near the project site. Sidewalk is also planned for the south side of 66th Street to connect to existing sidewalk to the east and west. Plans also include a shared use path on France Avenue north of 69th Street, a standard bike lane on 66th Street, and a buffered bike lane on York Avenue. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. September 2021 1-2 • In order to maintain clear sight lines for vehicles exiting onto W. 65th Street at the proposed access locations, it is recommended that the area north and east of the northeast corner of the building is free of obstructions such as signs, trees, or other landscaping. • The proposed project includes sidewalk on the west side of Barrie Road and the south side of 65th Street to the access drive. The site plan also shows an outdoor patio near the Barrie Road access. • The project includes 73 underground parking spaces. The peak parking demand using ITE data is 73 spaces, which equals the proposed parking supply. • The current Edina City code requires 120 parking spaces. The proposed draft parking ordinance that is in front of the City Council requires 80 parking stalls. • Per City requirements, a Tier 2 Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan is required for this project. TDM strategies for this site include: o Providing maps that show the area bus routes, bus schedules, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. o Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. o Providing bicycle parking spaces for employees. o Offering a pre-paid Metro Transit Go-To Card to all employees during orientation. The TDM plan strategies should be implemented at the time the project is complete and fully operational. The overall cost of the strategies is estimated at $1,000. September 2021 2-1 2.0 Purpose and Background The purpose of this Traffic and Parking Study is to evaluate the impacts of a proposed new medical office building located at 6500 Barrie Road in Edina, MN. The project site is located in the southwest quadrant of the Barrie Road/W. 65th Street intersection. The proposed project location is currently occupied by a medical office building and parking lot. The project location is shown in Figure 1. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development at the following intersections: • W. 66th Street/Barrie Road • W. 65th Street/Barrie Road • France Avenue/W. 65th Street • France Avenue/W. 66th Street • York Avenue/W. 66th Street • W. 65th Street/proposed access • Barrie Road/proposed access Proposed Development Characteristics The proposed project will involve removal of the existing building and constructing a new 23,320 square foot medical office building. The project includes 73 underground parking stalls. As shown in the site plan, one access point is provided on W. 65th Street and one on Barrie Road. The project is expected to be completed by the end of 2022. The current site plan is shown in Figure 2. September 2021 2-2 September 2021 2-3 September 2021 3-1 3.0 Existing Conditions The proposed site is currently occupied by a medical office building with 16,032 square feet of office space. The site is bounded by W. 65th Street on the north, Barrie Road on the east, and commercial uses on the west and south. Near the site location, both Barrie Road and W. 65th Street are two-lane roadways. To the west of the site, France Avenue is a six-lane divided roadway with turn lanes and signal control at major intersections. To the south of the site, 66th Street is a four-lane divided roadway. The speed limit on streets in the study area is 30 miles per hour. Existing conditions at the proposed project location are shown in Figure 3 and described below. France Avenue/W. 65th Street This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound approach provides one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn/through/right turn lane. The northbound and southbound approaches provide one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one through/right turn lane. France Avenue/W. 66th Street This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one right turn lane. The westbound approach provides two left turn lanes, two through lanes, and one right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane, three through lanes, and one right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one through/right turn lane. W. 65th Street/Barrie Road This four-way intersection is controlled with stop signs on the eastbound and westbound approaches. All approaches provide one left turn/through/right turn lane. W. 66th Street/Barrie Road This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the southbound approach. The eastbound approach provides on left turn lane and two through lanes. The westbound approach provides two through lanes and one through/right turn lane. This is a three- quarter access intersection with southbound through and left turn movements prohibited. York Avenue/W. 66th Street This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound and westbound approaches provide two left turn lanes, two through lanes, and one channelized right turn lane. The northbound approach provides two left turn lanes, two through lanes, and one right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one right turn lane. September 2021 3-2 Traffic Volume Data Existing turn movement data previously collected for other studies in the area was obtained for the following intersections: • France Avenue/W. 65th Street • France Avenue/W. 66th Street • York Avenue/W. 66th Street Turn movement data for the following intersections was collected during the weekday a.m. (7:00 - 9:00 a.m.) and p.m. (4:00 - 6:00 p.m.) peak periods in August 2021: • W. 66th Street/Barrie Road • W. 65th Street/Barrie Road September 2021 3-3 September 2021 4-1 4.0 Traffic Forecasts Traffic Forecast Scenarios To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project, forecasts and analyses were completed for the year 2023. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts were completed for the following scenarios: • 2021 Existing. Existing volumes were determined through traffic counts at the subject intersections. The existing volume information includes trips generated by the uses near the project site. • 2023 No-Build. Existing volumes at the subject intersections were increased by 0.5 percent per year to determine 2023 No-Build volumes. The 0.5 percent per year growth rate was calculated based on both recent growth experienced near the site and projected growth due to additional development in the area. • 2023 Build. Trips generated by the proposed development were added to the 2023 No-Build volumes to determine 2023 Build volumes. Estimation of Existing Volumes Due to COVID-19 Impacts The impacts of COVID-19 have resulted in significant reductions in traffic volumes due to changes in work and travel habits. Traffic volume data collected for studies completed prior to the pandemic was used to adjust the existing counts, resulting in reasonable estimates for the weekday peak hours that would occur under non-pandemic conditions. These volumes were used for the traffic forecasts presented in this report. Trip Generation for Proposed Project Weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip generation for the proposed development were calculated based on data presented in the tenth edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Table 4-1. Table 4-1 Trip Generation for Proposed Project and Existing Uses Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Proposed use Medical Office Building 23,320 SF 51 14 65 23 58 81 812 Existing use to be removed Medical Office Building 16,032 SF 35 10 45 15 40 55 558 Total net trips 16 4 20 8 18 26 254 SF=square feet September 2021 4-2 As shown, the project generates 20 net trips during the a.m. peak hour, 26 net trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 254 net trips daily. Trip Distribution Percentages Trip distribution percentages for the subject development trips were established based on the nearby roadway network, existing and expected future traffic patterns, and location of the subject development in relation to major attractions and population concentrations. The distribution percentages for trips generated by the proposed development are as follows: • 25 percent to/from the north on France Avenue • 20 percent to/from the south on France Avenue • 20 percent to/from the east on 66th Street • 10 percent to/from the west on 66th Street • 5 percent to/from the west on 65th Street • 10 percent to/from the north on York Avenue • 10 percent to/from the south on York Avenue Traffic Volumes Development trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the forecasting scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The resultant traffic volumes are presented in Figures 4 and 5. September 2021 4-3 September 2021 4-4 September 2021 5-1 5.0 Traffic Analysis Intersection Level of Service Analysis Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersections for all scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours using Synchro software. Initial analysis was completed using existing geometrics and intersection control. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. The following is a detailed description of the conditions described by each LOS designation: • Level of service A corresponds to a free flow condition with motorists virtually unaffected by the intersection control mechanism. For a signalized or an unsignalized intersection, the average delay per vehicle would be approximately 10 seconds or less. • Level of service B represents stable flow with a high degree of freedom, but with some influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. For a signalized intersection, the average delay ranges from 10 to 20 seconds. An unsignalized intersection would have delays ranging from 10 to 15 seconds for this level. • Level of service C depicts a restricted flow which remains stable, but with significant influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. The general level of comfort and convenience changes noticeably at this level. The delay ranges from 20 to 35 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 15 to 25 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service D corresponds to high-density flow in which speed and freedom are significantly restricted. Though traffic flow remains stable, reductions in comfort and convenience are experienced. The control delay for this level is 35 to 55 seconds for a signalized intersection and 25 to 35 seconds for an unsignalized intersection. • Level of service E represents unstable flow of traffic at or near the capacity of the intersection with poor levels of comfort and convenience. The delay ranges from 55 to 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 35 to 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service F represents forced flow in which the volume of traffic approaching the intersection exceeds the volume that can be served. Characteristics often experienced include long queues, stop-and-go waves, poor travel times, low comfort and convenience, and increased accident exposure. Delays over 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and over 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection correspond to this level of service. September 2021 5-2 The LOS results for the study intersections are shown in Figures 5 and 6 and are discussed below. France Avenue/W. 65th Street (traffic signal control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2023 No-Build, and 2023 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS B for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2023 No-Build, and 2023 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS B for all scenarios. France Avenue/W. 66th Street (traffic signal control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2023 No-Build, and 2023 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2023 No-Build, and 2023 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. W. 65th Street/Barrie Road (minor street stop control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2023 No-Build, and 2023 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2023 No-Build, and 2023 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. W. 66th Street/Barrie Road (minor street stop control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2023 No-Build, and 2023 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2023 No-Build, and 2023 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. York Avenue/W. 66th Street (traffic signal control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2023 No-Build, and 2023 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2023 No-Build, and 2023 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. September 2021 5-3 W. 65th Street/development access (minor street stop control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2023 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS A. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2023 Build conditions, all movements at LOS A. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. Barrie Road/development access (minor street stop control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2023 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS A. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2023 Build conditions, all movements at LOS A. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. Overall Traffic Impact The proposed project is expected to have minimal impact on the surrounding roadway system during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. No improvements are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. Proposed Access Locations The project includes an access on W. 65th Street located approximately 60 feet west of Barrie Road and an access on Barrie Road located approximately 270 south of W. 65th Street. As described above, both access points are expected to operate at acceptable levels of service during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak periods. In order to maintain clear sight lines for vehicles exiting onto W. 65th Street at the proposed access locations, it is recommended that the area north and east of the northeast corner of the building is free of obstructions such as signs, trees, or other landscaping. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Under existing conditions, sidewalk is provided on both sides of France Avenue and York Avenue. Sidewalk is provided on the north side of 66th Street. Sidewalk is not provided on 65th Street or Barrie Road near the project site. All signalized intersections in the study have crosswalks across all or a portion of the approaches. Bicycles are allowed on all the surrounding streets. Future plans for this area include adding sidewalk on both Barrie Road and 65th Street near the project site. Sidewalk is also planned for the south side of 66th Street to connect to existing sidewalk to the east and west. Plans also include a shared use path on France Avenue north of 69th Street, a standard bike lane on 66th Street, and a buffered bike lane on York Avenue. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. The proposed project includes sidewalk on the west side of Barrie Road and the south side of 65th Street to the access point. The site plan also shows an outdoor patio near the Barrie Road access. September 2021 5-4 Transit Facilities The subject site presently is served by the Metro Transit bus routes 6, 515, 578, and 579. Bus stops exist on Barrie Road at 65th Street, on 66th Street, and on York Avenue. Travel Demand Management Plan (TDM) Per City requirements, a Tier 2 Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan is required for this project. The goal of the TDM plan is to reduce vehicular trips during peak hours and carbon emissions from vehicles. TDM strategies for this site include: • Providing maps that show the area bus routes, bus schedules, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. • Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. • Providing bicycle parking spaces for employees. • Offering a pre-paid Metro Transit Go-To Card to all employees during orientation. The TDM plan strategies should be implemented at the time the project is complete and fully operational. The overall cost of the strategies is estimated at $1,000. September 2021 5-5 September 2021 5-6 September 2021 6-1 6.0 Parking Analysis As described earlier, the project includes 73 underground parking stalls. The proposed amount of parking was compared to industry standards to determine adequacy. Parking data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) was used to determine the expected parking demand for the proposed land uses. Data provided in the ITE publication Parking Generation, 5th Edition, indicates the various proposed uses peak at different times during the day. The ITE data was adjusted to account for the expected modal split for the site. Based on the ITE data, the peak weekday parking demand for the overall site 73 spaces. The total of 73 spaces provided equals peak parking demand. The current Edina City code requires 120 parking spaces. The proposed draft parking ordinance that is in from of the City Council requires 80 parking stalls. September 2021 7-1 7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to generate 20 net trips during the a.m. peak hour, 26 net trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 254 net trips daily. • The proposed project is expected to have minimal impact on the surrounding roadway system during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. No improvements are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. • Traffic volume data collected in 2018 for previous studies in this area was used whenever possible to avoid traffic volume reductions that have occurred due to the COVID-19 pandemic impacts. However, some intersections included in the study did not have previous data and therefore new data was collected. This data was carefully reviewed and adjusted using data from nearby intersections to account for pandemic related traffic volume reductions. This process resulted in reasonable estimates for the weekday peak hours that would occur under non-pandemic conditions. • Future plans for this area include adding sidewalk on both Barrie Road and 65th Street near the project site. Sidewalk is also planned for the south side of 66th Street to connect to existing sidewalk to the east and west. Plans also include a shared use path on France Avenue north of 69th Street, a standard bike lane on 66th Street, and a buffered bike lane on York Avenue. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. • In order to maintain clear sight lines for vehicles exiting onto W. 65th Street at the proposed access locations, it is recommended that the area north and east of the northeast corner of the building is free of obstructions such as signs, trees, or other landscaping. • The proposed project includes sidewalk on the west side of Barrie Road and the south side of 65th Street to the access drive. The site plan also shows an outdoor patio near the Barrie Road access. • The project includes 73 underground parking spaces. The peak parking demand using ITE data is 73 spaces, which equals the proposed parking supply. • The current Edina City code requires 120 parking spaces. The proposed draft parking ordinance that is in front of the City Council requires 80 parking stalls. • Per City requirements, a Tier 2 Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan is required for this project. TDM strategies for this site include: o Providing maps that show the area bus routes, bus schedules, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. o Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. o Providing bicycle parking spaces for employees. September 2021 7-2 o Offering a pre-paid Metro Transit Go-To Card to all employees during orientation. The TDM plan strategies should be implemented at the time the project is complete and fully operational. The overall cost of the strategies is estimated at $1,000. September 2021 8-1 8.0 Appendix • Level of Service Worksheets HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: France Ave & 65th Street 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2021 am.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 74 161 42 40 43 197 66 483 173 229 738 108 Future Volume (veh/h) 74 161 42 40 43 197 66 483 173 229 738 108 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 80 175 46 43 47 0 72 525 0 249 802 117 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 294 242 64 112 97 498 2784 703 2640 383 Arrive On Green 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.05 0.55 0.00 0.09 0.59 0.59 Sat Flow, veh/h 1359 1428 375 219 573 1585 1781 5274 0 1781 4504 653 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 80 0 221 90 0 0 72 525 0 249 605 314 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1359 0 1803 792 0 1585 1781 1702 0 1781 1702 1753 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 8.2 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.2 3.7 0.0 4.1 6.3 6.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.7 0.0 8.2 9.7 0.0 0.0 1.2 3.7 0.0 4.1 6.3 6.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.21 0.48 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.37 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 294 0 306 210 0 498 2784 703 1995 1027 V/C Ratio(X) 0.27 0.00 0.72 0.43 0.00 0.14 0.19 0.35 0.30 0.31 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 553 0 649 485 0 642 2784 1126 1995 1027 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.4 0.0 27.8 27.4 0.0 0.0 6.0 8.2 0.0 5.3 7.4 7.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.0 3.2 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.2 0.0 3.7 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.2 0.0 1.2 2.0 2.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 26.8 0.0 31.0 28.8 0.0 0.0 6.2 8.3 0.0 5.7 7.8 8.2 LnGrp LOS C A C C A A A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 301 90 A 597 A 1168 Approach Delay, s/veh 29.9 28.8 8.1 7.4 Approach LOS C C A A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.2 43.1 16.5 8.3 46.0 16.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 23.5 27.5 25.5 9.5 41.5 25.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.1 5.7 10.2 3.2 8.4 11.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 3.6 1.3 0.1 7.2 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.6 HCM 6th LOS B Notes Unsignalized Delay for [NBR, WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 5: France Ave & 66th Street 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2021 am.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 85 154 45 171 139 151 42 540 108 127 642 51 Future Volume (veh/h) 85 154 45 171 139 151 42 540 108 127 642 51 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 92 167 49 186 151 164 46 587 117 138 698 55 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 120 455 203 288 512 228 76 2157 670 179 2317 182 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.13 0.13 0.08 0.14 0.14 0.04 0.42 0.42 0.10 0.48 0.48 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1585 3456 3554 1585 1781 5106 1585 1781 4828 378 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 92 167 49 186 151 164 46 587 117 138 491 262 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1728 1777 1585 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1802 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.4 2.9 1.9 3.5 2.6 6.7 1.7 5.1 3.1 5.1 5.9 6.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.4 2.9 1.9 3.5 2.6 6.7 1.7 5.1 3.1 5.1 5.9 6.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.21 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 120 455 203 288 512 228 76 2157 670 179 1634 865 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.37 0.24 0.65 0.29 0.72 0.60 0.27 0.17 0.77 0.30 0.30 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 329 1076 480 587 1023 456 197 2157 670 434 1634 865 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.1 27.0 26.6 30.1 25.9 27.7 31.8 12.8 12.2 29.7 10.7 10.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.8 0.5 0.6 2.4 0.3 4.2 7.5 0.3 0.6 6.9 0.5 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.7 1.2 0.7 1.5 1.1 2.7 0.9 1.8 1.1 2.4 2.1 2.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 40.8 27.5 27.2 32.5 26.2 31.9 39.3 13.1 12.8 36.6 11.2 11.6 LnGrp LOS D C C C C C D B B D B B Approach Vol, veh/h 308 501 750 891 Approach Delay, s/veh 31.4 30.4 14.6 15.2 Approach LOS C C B B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.3 33.1 10.1 13.2 7.4 37.0 9.1 14.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.5 23.5 11.5 20.5 7.5 32.5 12.5 19.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.1 7.1 5.5 4.9 3.7 8.0 5.4 8.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 4.1 0.3 1.0 0.0 5.2 0.1 1.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.2 HCM 6th LOS C HCM 6th TWSC 1: Barrie Road & 65th Street 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2021 am.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 1 40 1 2 0 47 32 1 0 29 43 Future Vol, veh/h 6 1 40 1 2 0 47 32 1 0 29 43 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 7 1 43 1 2 0 51 35 1 0 32 47 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 195 194 56 216 217 36 79 0 0 36 0 0 Stage 1 56 56 - 138 138 - - - - - - - Stage 2 139 138 - 78 79 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 764 701 1011 740 681 1037 1519 - - 1575 - - Stage 1 956 848 - 865 782 - - - - - - - Stage 2 864 782 - 931 829 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 743 677 1011 689 658 1037 1519 - - 1575 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 743 677 - 689 658 - - - - - - - Stage 1 923 848 - 836 755 - - - - - - - Stage 2 832 755 - 890 829 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9 10.4 4.4 0 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1519 - - 957 668 1575 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.034 - - 0.053 0.005 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - 9 10.4 0 - - HCM Lane LOS A A - A B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.2 0 0 - - HCM 6th TWSC 9: 66th Street & Barrie Road 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2021 am.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 41 474 1078 60 0 43 Future Vol, veh/h 41 474 1078 60 0 43 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 45 515 1172 65 0 47 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1237 0 - 0 - 619 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 5.34 - - - - 7.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.12 - - - - 3.92 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 300 - - - 0 370 Stage 1 - - - - 0 - Stage 2 - - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 300 - - - - 370 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.5 0 16.1 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 300 - - - 370 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.149 - - - 0.126 HCM Control Delay (s) 19.1 - - - 16.1 HCM Lane LOS C - - - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 - - - 0.4 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: York Avenue & 66th Street 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2021 am.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 222 200 105 249 718 61 164 336 132 25 411 271 Future Volume (veh/h) 222 200 105 249 718 61 164 336 132 25 411 271 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 241 217 0 271 780 66 178 365 143 27 447 295 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 339 991 373 1025 457 268 1216 542 51 1042 465 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.28 0.00 0.11 0.29 0.29 0.08 0.34 0.34 0.03 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3554 1585 3456 3554 1585 3456 3554 1585 1781 3554 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 241 217 0 271 780 66 178 365 143 27 447 295 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1777 1585 1728 1777 1585 1728 1777 1585 1781 1777 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.0 3.5 0.0 5.6 14.9 2.3 3.7 5.6 4.8 1.1 7.6 12.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.0 3.5 0.0 5.6 14.9 2.3 3.7 5.6 4.8 1.1 7.6 12.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 339 991 373 1025 457 268 1216 542 51 1042 465 V/C Ratio(X) 0.71 0.22 0.73 0.76 0.14 0.66 0.30 0.26 0.53 0.43 0.63 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 535 1364 582 1412 630 442 1216 542 134 1042 465 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.5 20.6 0.0 32.1 24.1 19.6 33.3 17.9 17.7 35.6 21.2 22.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.7 0.1 0.0 2.7 1.6 0.1 2.8 0.6 1.2 8.2 1.3 6.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.2 1.4 0.0 2.4 6.1 0.8 1.6 2.3 1.9 0.6 3.2 5.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 35.2 20.7 0.0 34.8 25.7 19.8 36.1 18.5 18.9 43.7 22.5 29.2 LnGrp LOS D C C C B D B B D C C Approach Vol, veh/h 458 A 1117 686 769 Approach Delay, s/veh 28.3 27.6 23.2 25.8 Approach LOS C C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.6 29.9 12.5 25.2 10.3 26.3 11.8 25.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.6 25.4 12.5 28.5 9.5 21.5 11.5 29.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.1 7.6 7.6 5.5 5.7 14.0 7.0 16.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.7 0.4 1.3 0.2 2.4 0.3 4.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 26.2 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: France Ave & 65th Street 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2023 am no build.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 75 163 42 40 43 199 67 488 175 231 745 109 Future Volume (veh/h) 75 163 42 40 43 199 67 488 175 231 745 109 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 82 177 46 43 47 0 73 530 0 251 810 118 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 295 244 64 112 97 495 2777 700 2636 382 Arrive On Green 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.05 0.54 0.00 0.10 0.59 0.59 Sat Flow, veh/h 1359 1431 372 218 569 1585 1781 5274 0 1781 4505 652 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 82 0 223 90 0 0 73 530 0 251 611 317 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1359 0 1803 786 0 1585 1781 1702 0 1781 1702 1753 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 8.3 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.2 3.7 0.0 4.1 6.4 6.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.8 0.0 8.3 9.8 0.0 0.0 1.2 3.7 0.0 4.1 6.4 6.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.21 0.48 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.37 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 295 0 308 209 0 495 2777 700 1992 1026 V/C Ratio(X) 0.28 0.00 0.72 0.43 0.00 0.15 0.19 0.36 0.31 0.31 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 551 0 648 482 0 638 2777 1121 1992 1026 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.4 0.0 27.8 27.5 0.0 0.0 6.1 8.2 0.0 5.4 7.4 7.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.0 3.2 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.2 0.0 3.7 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.2 0.0 1.2 2.1 2.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 26.9 0.0 31.1 28.8 0.0 0.0 6.2 8.4 0.0 5.7 7.8 8.2 LnGrp LOS C A C C A A A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 305 90 A 603 A 1179 Approach Delay, s/veh 29.9 28.8 8.1 7.5 Approach LOS C C A A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.2 43.1 16.6 8.3 46.0 16.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 23.5 27.5 25.5 9.5 41.5 25.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.1 5.7 10.3 3.2 8.5 11.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 3.6 1.3 0.1 7.3 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.7 HCM 6th LOS B Notes Unsignalized Delay for [NBR, WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 5: France Ave & 66th Street 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2023 am no build.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 86 156 45 173 140 153 42 545 109 128 648 52 Future Volume (veh/h) 86 156 45 173 140 153 42 545 109 128 648 52 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 93 170 49 188 152 166 46 592 118 139 704 57 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 121 460 205 290 516 230 76 2148 667 180 2306 186 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.13 0.13 0.08 0.15 0.15 0.04 0.42 0.42 0.10 0.48 0.48 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1585 3456 3554 1585 1781 5106 1585 1781 4817 388 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 93 170 49 188 152 166 46 592 118 139 496 265 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1728 1777 1585 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1801 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.5 3.0 1.9 3.6 2.6 6.8 1.7 5.2 3.2 5.2 6.0 6.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.5 3.0 1.9 3.6 2.6 6.8 1.7 5.2 3.2 5.2 6.0 6.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.22 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 121 460 205 290 516 230 76 2148 667 180 1630 862 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.37 0.24 0.65 0.29 0.72 0.60 0.28 0.18 0.77 0.30 0.31 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 328 1073 479 585 1021 455 197 2148 667 433 1630 862 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.1 27.0 26.5 30.1 25.9 27.7 31.9 12.9 12.3 29.8 10.8 10.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.7 0.5 0.6 2.4 0.3 4.2 7.5 0.3 0.6 6.9 0.5 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 1.2 0.7 1.5 1.1 2.7 0.9 1.9 1.1 2.5 2.1 2.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 40.8 27.5 27.1 32.6 26.2 31.9 39.4 13.2 12.9 36.7 11.3 11.7 LnGrp LOS D C C C C C D B B D B B Approach Vol, veh/h 312 506 756 900 Approach Delay, s/veh 31.4 30.4 14.8 15.3 Approach LOS C C B B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.3 33.1 10.2 13.3 7.4 37.0 9.1 14.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.5 23.5 11.5 20.5 7.5 32.5 12.5 19.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.2 7.2 5.6 5.0 3.7 8.1 5.5 8.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 4.1 0.3 1.0 0.0 5.3 0.1 1.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.3 HCM 6th LOS C HCM 6th TWSC 1: Barrie Road & 65th Street 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2023 am no build.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 1 40 1 2 0 47 32 1 0 29 43 Future Vol, veh/h 6 1 40 1 2 0 47 32 1 0 29 43 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 7 1 43 1 2 0 51 35 1 0 32 47 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 195 194 56 216 217 36 79 0 0 36 0 0 Stage 1 56 56 - 138 138 - - - - - - - Stage 2 139 138 - 78 79 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 764 701 1011 740 681 1037 1519 - - 1575 - - Stage 1 956 848 - 865 782 - - - - - - - Stage 2 864 782 - 931 829 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 743 677 1011 689 658 1037 1519 - - 1575 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 743 677 - 689 658 - - - - - - - Stage 1 923 848 - 836 755 - - - - - - - Stage 2 832 755 - 890 829 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9 10.4 4.4 0 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1519 - - 957 668 1575 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.034 - - 0.053 0.005 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - 9 10.4 0 - - HCM Lane LOS A A - A B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.2 0 0 - - HCM 6th TWSC 9: 66th Street & Barrie Road 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2023 am no build.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 41 479 1089 61 0 43 Future Vol, veh/h 41 479 1089 61 0 43 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 45 521 1184 66 0 47 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1250 0 - 0 - 625 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 5.34 - - - - 7.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.12 - - - - 3.92 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 296 - - - 0 367 Stage 1 - - - - 0 - Stage 2 - - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 296 - - - - 367 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.5 0 16.2 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 296 - - - 367 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.151 - - - 0.127 HCM Control Delay (s) 19.3 - - - 16.2 HCM Lane LOS C - - - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 - - - 0.4 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: York Avenue & 66th Street 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2023 am no build.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 224 202 106 251 725 62 166 339 133 25 415 274 Future Volume (veh/h) 224 202 106 251 725 62 166 339 133 25 415 274 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 243 220 0 273 788 67 180 368 145 27 451 298 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 341 998 374 1032 460 270 1211 540 51 1036 462 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.28 0.00 0.11 0.29 0.29 0.08 0.34 0.34 0.03 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3554 1585 3456 3554 1585 3456 3554 1585 1781 3554 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 243 220 0 273 788 67 180 368 145 27 451 298 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1777 1585 1728 1777 1585 1728 1777 1585 1781 1777 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.1 3.5 0.0 5.7 15.1 2.3 3.8 5.7 4.9 1.1 7.7 12.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.1 3.5 0.0 5.7 15.1 2.3 3.8 5.7 4.9 1.1 7.7 12.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 341 998 374 1032 460 270 1211 540 51 1036 462 V/C Ratio(X) 0.71 0.22 0.73 0.76 0.15 0.67 0.30 0.27 0.53 0.44 0.65 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 533 1359 579 1406 627 440 1211 540 134 1036 462 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.6 20.6 0.0 32.2 24.1 19.6 33.4 18.1 17.8 35.7 21.4 23.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.8 0.1 0.0 2.7 1.7 0.1 2.8 0.6 1.2 8.2 1.3 6.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.2 1.4 0.0 2.5 6.2 0.8 1.6 2.3 1.9 0.6 3.2 5.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 35.3 20.7 0.0 34.9 25.8 19.7 36.3 18.7 19.1 43.9 22.8 29.8 LnGrp LOS D C C C B D B B D C C Approach Vol, veh/h 463 A 1128 693 776 Approach Delay, s/veh 28.4 27.7 23.3 26.2 Approach LOS C C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.6 29.9 12.6 25.4 10.3 26.2 11.9 26.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.6 25.4 12.5 28.5 9.5 21.5 11.5 29.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.1 7.7 7.7 5.5 5.8 14.2 7.1 17.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.7 0.4 1.3 0.2 2.4 0.3 4.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 26.4 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: France Ave & 65th Street 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2023 am build.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 75 164 42 40 44 200 67 488 175 235 745 109 Future Volume (veh/h) 75 164 42 40 44 200 67 488 175 235 745 109 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 82 178 46 43 48 0 73 530 0 255 810 118 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 294 245 63 111 99 494 2769 700 2634 381 Arrive On Green 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.05 0.54 0.00 0.10 0.58 0.58 Sat Flow, veh/h 1357 1433 370 215 576 1585 1781 5274 0 1781 4505 652 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 82 0 224 91 0 0 73 530 0 255 611 317 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1357 0 1804 791 0 1585 1781 1702 0 1781 1702 1753 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 8.3 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.2 3.8 0.0 4.2 6.4 6.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.9 0.0 8.3 9.8 0.0 0.0 1.2 3.8 0.0 4.2 6.4 6.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.21 0.47 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.37 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 294 0 309 210 0 494 2769 700 1991 1025 V/C Ratio(X) 0.28 0.00 0.73 0.43 0.00 0.15 0.19 0.36 0.31 0.31 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 549 0 648 483 0 637 2769 1119 1991 1025 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.4 0.0 27.8 27.4 0.0 0.0 6.1 8.3 0.0 5.4 7.5 7.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.0 3.2 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.2 0.0 3.7 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.2 0.0 1.3 2.1 2.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 26.9 0.0 31.1 28.8 0.0 0.0 6.3 8.4 0.0 5.7 7.9 8.3 LnGrp LOS C A C C A A A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 306 91 A 603 A 1183 Approach Delay, s/veh 30.0 28.8 8.2 7.5 Approach LOS C C A A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.3 43.0 16.7 8.3 46.0 16.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 23.5 27.5 25.5 9.5 41.5 25.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.2 5.8 10.3 3.2 8.5 11.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 3.6 1.3 0.1 7.3 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.7 HCM 6th LOS B Notes Unsignalized Delay for [NBR, WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 5: France Ave & 66th Street 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2023 am build.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 86 157 45 174 140 153 42 545 112 128 648 52 Future Volume (veh/h) 86 157 45 174 140 153 42 545 112 128 648 52 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 93 171 49 189 152 166 46 592 122 139 704 57 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 121 459 205 291 516 230 76 2148 667 180 2306 186 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.13 0.13 0.08 0.15 0.15 0.04 0.42 0.42 0.10 0.48 0.48 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1585 3456 3554 1585 1781 5106 1585 1781 4817 388 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 93 171 49 189 152 166 46 592 122 139 496 265 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1728 1777 1585 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1801 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.5 3.0 1.9 3.6 2.6 6.8 1.7 5.2 3.3 5.2 6.0 6.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.5 3.0 1.9 3.6 2.6 6.8 1.7 5.2 3.3 5.2 6.0 6.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.22 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 121 459 205 291 516 230 76 2148 667 180 1630 862 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.37 0.24 0.65 0.29 0.72 0.60 0.28 0.18 0.77 0.30 0.31 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 328 1073 479 585 1021 455 197 2148 667 433 1630 862 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.1 27.0 26.6 30.1 25.9 27.7 31.9 12.9 12.3 29.8 10.8 10.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.7 0.5 0.6 2.4 0.3 4.2 7.5 0.3 0.6 6.9 0.5 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 1.2 0.7 1.5 1.1 2.7 0.9 1.9 1.2 2.5 2.1 2.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 40.8 27.5 27.2 32.5 26.2 31.9 39.4 13.2 12.9 36.7 11.3 11.7 LnGrp LOS D C C C C C D B B D B B Approach Vol, veh/h 313 507 760 900 Approach Delay, s/veh 31.4 30.4 14.8 15.3 Approach LOS C C B B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.3 33.1 10.2 13.3 7.4 37.0 9.1 14.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.5 23.5 11.5 20.5 7.5 32.5 12.5 19.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.2 7.2 5.6 5.0 3.7 8.1 5.5 8.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 4.1 0.3 1.0 0.0 5.3 0.1 1.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.3 HCM 6th LOS C HCM 6th TWSC 1: Barrie Road & 65th Street 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2023 am build.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 1 52 1 2 0 66 32 1 0 29 43 Future Vol, veh/h 6 1 52 1 2 0 66 32 1 0 29 43 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 7 1 57 1 2 0 72 35 1 0 32 47 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 237 236 56 265 259 36 79 0 0 36 0 0 Stage 1 56 56 - 180 180 - - - - - - - Stage 2 181 180 - 85 79 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 717 665 1011 688 645 1037 1519 - - 1575 - - Stage 1 956 848 - 822 750 - - - - - - - Stage 2 821 750 - 923 829 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 689 633 1011 625 614 1037 1519 - - 1575 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 689 633 - 625 614 - - - - - - - Stage 1 910 848 - 783 714 - - - - - - - Stage 2 779 714 - 870 829 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9 10.9 5 0 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1519 - - 956 618 1575 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.047 - - 0.067 0.005 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - 9 10.9 0 - - HCM Lane LOS A A - A B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.2 0 0 - - HCM 6th TWSC 9: 66th Street & Barrie Road 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2023 am build.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.1 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 56 479 1089 68 0 52 Future Vol, veh/h 56 479 1089 68 0 52 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 61 521 1184 74 0 57 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1258 0 - 0 - 629 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 5.34 - - - - 7.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.12 - - - - 3.92 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 293 - - - 0 364 Stage 1 - - - - 0 - Stage 2 - - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 293 - - - - 364 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.1 0 16.7 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 293 - - - 364 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.208 - - - 0.155 HCM Control Delay (s) 20.5 - - - 16.7 HCM Lane LOS C - - - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 - - - 0.5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: York Avenue & 66th Street 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2023 am build.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 224 203 106 251 728 62 168 339 133 25 415 276 Future Volume (veh/h) 224 203 106 251 728 62 168 339 133 25 415 276 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 243 221 0 273 791 67 183 368 145 27 451 300 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 341 1000 374 1034 461 273 1209 539 51 1031 460 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.28 0.00 0.11 0.29 0.29 0.08 0.34 0.34 0.03 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3554 1585 3456 3554 1585 3456 3554 1585 1781 3554 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 243 221 0 273 791 67 183 368 145 27 451 300 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1777 1585 1728 1777 1585 1728 1777 1585 1781 1777 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.1 3.6 0.0 5.7 15.1 2.3 3.8 5.7 5.0 1.1 7.7 12.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.1 3.6 0.0 5.7 15.1 2.3 3.8 5.7 5.0 1.1 7.7 12.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 341 1000 374 1034 461 273 1209 539 51 1031 460 V/C Ratio(X) 0.71 0.22 0.73 0.76 0.15 0.67 0.30 0.27 0.53 0.44 0.65 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 532 1357 579 1405 627 440 1209 539 134 1031 460 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.6 20.5 0.0 32.2 24.1 19.6 33.4 18.1 17.9 35.7 21.5 23.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.8 0.1 0.0 2.7 1.8 0.1 2.8 0.6 1.2 8.2 1.4 7.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.2 1.4 0.0 2.5 6.3 0.8 1.7 2.3 1.9 0.6 3.2 5.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 35.4 20.7 0.0 35.0 25.9 19.7 36.3 18.8 19.1 43.9 22.9 30.2 LnGrp LOS D C C C B D B B D C C Approach Vol, veh/h 464 A 1131 696 778 Approach Delay, s/veh 28.4 27.7 23.4 26.5 Approach LOS C C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.6 29.9 12.6 25.5 10.4 26.1 11.9 26.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.6 25.4 12.5 28.5 9.5 21.5 11.5 29.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.1 7.7 7.7 5.6 5.8 14.4 7.1 17.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.7 0.4 1.3 0.2 2.4 0.3 4.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 26.5 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th TWSC 14: access & 65th Street 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2023 am build.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 55 8 17 95 3 4 Future Vol, veh/h 55 8 17 95 3 4 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 60 9 18 103 3 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 69 0 204 65 Stage 1 - - - - 65 - Stage 2 - - - - 139 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1532 - 784 999 Stage 1 - - - - 958 - Stage 2 - - - - 888 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1532 - 775 999 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 775 - Stage 1 - - - - 958 - Stage 2 - - - - 877 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.1 9.1 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 889 - - 1532 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 - - 0.012 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.1 - - 7.4 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 17: Barrie Road & access 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2023 am build.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 5 18 98 75 8 Future Vol, veh/h 2 5 18 98 75 8 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 5 20 107 82 9 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 234 87 91 0 - 0 Stage 1 87 - - - - - Stage 2 147 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 754 971 1504 - - - Stage 1 936 - - - - - Stage 2 880 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 743 971 1504 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 743 - - - - - Stage 1 923 - - - - - Stage 2 880 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.1 1.2 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1504 - 893 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - 0.009 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 9.1 - - HCM Lane LOS A A A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 - - HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: France Ave & 65th Street 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2021 pm.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 138 83 107 55 98 383 37 1170 83 88 741 32 Future Volume (veh/h) 138 83 107 55 98 383 37 1170 83 88 741 32 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 150 90 116 60 107 0 40 1272 0 96 805 35 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 314 153 198 125 187 484 2744 380 2807 122 Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.04 0.54 0.00 0.06 0.56 0.56 Sat Flow, veh/h 1287 742 956 260 907 1585 1781 5274 0 1781 5018 218 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 150 0 206 167 0 0 40 1272 0 96 545 295 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1287 0 1698 1167 0 1585 1781 1702 0 1781 1702 1831 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 0.0 7.6 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 10.6 0.0 1.6 5.8 5.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.6 0.0 7.6 10.6 0.0 0.0 0.7 10.6 0.0 1.6 5.8 5.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.56 0.36 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.12 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 314 0 351 312 0 484 2744 380 1905 1025 V/C Ratio(X) 0.48 0.00 0.59 0.54 0.00 0.08 0.46 0.25 0.29 0.29 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 653 0 798 718 0 552 2744 508 1905 1025 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.0 0.0 24.8 25.5 0.0 0.0 6.5 9.9 0.0 6.9 8.0 8.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.1 0.0 1.6 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.3 0.0 3.0 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.2 3.5 0.0 0.5 1.9 2.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 27.1 0.0 26.3 26.9 0.0 0.0 6.6 10.4 0.0 7.3 8.4 8.7 LnGrp LOS C A C C A A B A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 356 167 A 1312 A 936 Approach Delay, s/veh 26.7 26.9 10.3 8.4 Approach LOS C C B A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.7 41.7 18.8 7.2 43.2 18.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.2 34.8 32.5 5.3 38.7 32.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.6 12.6 12.6 2.7 7.8 12.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 9.9 1.7 0.0 6.3 0.9 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.8 HCM 6th LOS B Notes Unsignalized Delay for [NBR, WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 5: France Ave & 66th Street 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2021 pm.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 99 651 78 248 369 208 112 1001 218 155 595 84 Future Volume (veh/h) 99 651 78 248 369 208 112 1001 218 155 595 84 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 108 708 85 270 401 226 122 1088 237 168 647 91 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 139 860 384 357 950 424 156 1612 501 207 1561 217 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.24 0.24 0.10 0.27 0.27 0.09 0.32 0.32 0.12 0.34 0.34 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1585 3456 3554 1585 1781 5106 1585 1781 4531 630 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 108 708 85 270 401 226 122 1088 237 168 484 254 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1728 1777 1585 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1757 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.8 15.2 3.5 6.1 7.5 9.8 5.4 15.0 9.7 7.4 8.8 8.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.8 15.2 3.5 6.1 7.5 9.8 5.4 15.0 9.7 7.4 8.8 8.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.36 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 139 860 384 357 950 424 156 1612 501 207 1173 605 V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.82 0.22 0.76 0.42 0.53 0.78 0.67 0.47 0.81 0.41 0.42 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 265 990 442 449 950 424 280 1612 501 298 1173 605 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.5 29.0 24.5 35.2 24.4 25.3 36.1 24.0 22.2 34.8 20.2 20.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.0 5.1 0.3 5.6 0.3 1.3 8.4 2.3 3.2 10.6 1.1 2.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.4 6.8 1.3 2.8 3.1 3.7 2.7 6.1 3.9 3.8 3.5 3.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 45.6 34.0 24.8 40.8 24.7 26.6 44.5 26.3 25.4 45.5 21.3 22.4 LnGrp LOS D C C D C C D C C D C C Approach Vol, veh/h 901 897 1447 906 Approach Delay, s/veh 34.5 30.0 27.7 26.1 Approach LOS C C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.9 30.0 12.8 24.0 11.6 32.3 10.8 26.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.5 25.5 10.5 22.5 12.7 26.3 12.0 21.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.4 17.0 8.1 17.2 7.4 10.9 6.8 11.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 5.1 0.2 2.3 0.1 4.3 0.1 2.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 29.3 HCM 6th LOS C HCM 6th TWSC 1: Barrie Road & 65th Street 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2021 pm.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 43 1 21 0 1 0 55 46 2 0 19 39 Future Vol, veh/h 43 1 21 0 1 0 55 46 2 0 19 39 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 47 1 23 0 1 0 60 50 2 0 21 42 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 214 214 42 225 234 51 63 0 0 52 0 0 Stage 1 42 42 - 171 171 - - - - - - - Stage 2 172 172 - 54 63 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 743 684 1029 730 666 1017 1540 - - 1554 - - Stage 1 972 860 - 831 757 - - - - - - - Stage 2 830 756 - 958 842 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 719 657 1029 691 639 1017 1540 - - 1554 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 719 657 - 691 639 - - - - - - - Stage 1 933 860 - 798 727 - - - - - - - Stage 2 796 726 - 936 842 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10 10.6 4 0 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1540 - - 795 639 1554 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.039 - - 0.089 0.002 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 - 10 10.6 0 - - HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.3 0 0 - - HCM 6th TWSC 9: 66th Street & Barrie Road 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2021 pm.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 32 1410 747 32 0 59 Future Vol, veh/h 32 1410 747 32 0 59 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 35 1533 812 35 0 64 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 847 0 - 0 - 424 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 5.34 - - - - 7.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.12 - - - - 3.92 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 464 - - - 0 495 Stage 1 - - - - 0 - Stage 2 - - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 464 - - - - 495 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 0 13.4 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 464 - - - 495 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.075 - - - 0.13 HCM Control Delay (s) 13.4 - - - 13.4 HCM Lane LOS B - - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - - 0.4 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: York Avenue & 66th Street 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2021 pm.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 526 741 199 308 410 107 186 716 338 87 477 188 Future Volume (veh/h) 526 741 199 308 410 107 186 716 338 87 477 188 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 572 805 0 335 446 116 202 778 367 95 518 204 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 677 970 420 706 315 287 1128 503 122 1076 480 Arrive On Green 0.20 0.27 0.00 0.12 0.20 0.20 0.08 0.32 0.32 0.07 0.30 0.30 Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3554 1585 3456 3554 1585 3456 3554 1585 1781 3554 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 572 805 0 335 446 116 202 778 367 95 518 204 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1777 1585 1728 1777 1585 1728 1777 1585 1781 1777 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.1 17.4 0.0 7.7 9.4 5.2 4.7 15.7 16.8 4.3 9.7 8.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.1 17.4 0.0 7.7 9.4 5.2 4.7 15.7 16.8 4.3 9.7 8.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 677 970 420 706 315 287 1128 503 122 1076 480 V/C Ratio(X) 0.85 0.83 0.80 0.63 0.37 0.70 0.69 0.73 0.78 0.48 0.42 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 823 1128 485 781 348 422 1128 503 185 1076 480 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.7 28.0 0.0 35.0 30.1 28.4 36.6 24.4 24.8 37.5 23.3 22.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.9 4.7 0.0 8.0 1.4 0.7 3.2 3.5 9.0 11.1 1.5 2.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.9 7.7 0.0 3.6 4.1 2.0 2.1 6.8 7.3 2.2 4.2 3.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 38.6 32.7 0.0 43.0 31.5 29.1 39.8 27.9 33.8 48.7 24.8 25.6 LnGrp LOS D C D C C D C C D C C Approach Vol, veh/h 1377 A 897 1347 817 Approach Delay, s/veh 35.2 35.5 31.3 27.8 Approach LOS D D C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.1 30.5 14.5 26.9 11.3 29.3 20.5 20.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.5 26.0 11.5 26.0 10.0 24.5 19.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.3 18.8 9.7 19.4 6.7 11.7 15.1 11.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.8 0.2 2.9 0.2 3.4 1.0 1.8 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 32.7 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: France Ave & 65th Street 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2023 pm no build.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 139 84 108 56 99 387 37 1182 84 89 748 32 Future Volume (veh/h) 139 84 108 56 99 387 37 1182 84 89 748 32 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 151 91 117 61 108 0 40 1285 0 97 813 35 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 315 155 199 125 188 480 2735 376 2800 120 Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.04 0.54 0.00 0.06 0.56 0.56 Sat Flow, veh/h 1286 743 955 262 900 1585 1781 5274 0 1781 5020 216 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 151 0 208 169 0 0 40 1285 0 97 551 297 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1286 0 1698 1162 0 1585 1781 1702 0 1781 1702 1832 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 0.0 7.7 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.7 10.8 0.0 1.6 5.9 5.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.8 0.0 7.7 10.8 0.0 0.0 0.7 10.8 0.0 1.6 5.9 5.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.56 0.36 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.12 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 315 0 355 313 0 480 2735 376 1899 1022 V/C Ratio(X) 0.48 0.00 0.59 0.54 0.00 0.08 0.47 0.26 0.29 0.29 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 649 0 796 713 0 547 2735 511 1899 1022 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.0 0.0 24.7 25.5 0.0 0.0 6.6 10.0 0.0 7.1 8.1 8.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.1 0.0 1.5 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.3 0.0 3.1 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.2 3.6 0.0 0.5 2.0 2.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 27.1 0.0 26.3 27.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 10.6 0.0 7.4 8.5 8.8 LnGrp LOS C A C C A A B A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 359 169 A 1325 A 945 Approach Delay, s/veh 26.6 27.0 10.5 8.5 Approach LOS C C B A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.7 41.7 19.0 7.2 43.2 19.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.5 34.5 32.5 5.3 38.7 32.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.6 12.8 12.8 2.7 7.9 12.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 9.9 1.7 0.0 6.4 0.9 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.9 HCM 6th LOS B Notes Unsignalized Delay for [NBR, WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 5: France Ave & 66th Street 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2023 pm no build.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 100 658 79 250 373 210 113 1011 220 157 601 85 Future Volume (veh/h) 100 658 79 250 373 210 113 1011 220 157 601 85 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 109 715 86 272 405 228 123 1099 239 171 653 92 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 140 863 385 358 953 425 157 1603 498 210 1557 217 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.24 0.24 0.10 0.27 0.27 0.09 0.31 0.31 0.12 0.34 0.34 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1585 3456 3554 1585 1781 5106 1585 1781 4530 631 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 109 715 86 272 405 228 123 1099 239 171 489 256 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1728 1777 1585 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1757 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.9 15.5 3.5 6.2 7.6 10.0 5.5 15.3 9.9 7.6 8.9 9.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.9 15.5 3.5 6.2 7.6 10.0 5.5 15.3 9.9 7.6 8.9 9.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.36 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 140 863 385 358 953 425 157 1603 498 210 1170 604 V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.83 0.22 0.76 0.43 0.54 0.79 0.69 0.48 0.82 0.42 0.42 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 265 985 439 447 953 425 281 1603 498 296 1170 604 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.7 29.1 24.6 35.4 24.5 25.4 36.3 24.3 22.5 35.0 20.4 20.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.0 5.4 0.3 5.8 0.3 1.3 8.4 2.4 3.3 11.3 1.1 2.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.4 7.0 1.3 2.8 3.2 3.8 2.7 6.2 4.0 3.9 3.6 3.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 45.7 34.5 24.9 41.2 24.9 26.7 44.6 26.8 25.8 46.3 21.5 22.6 LnGrp LOS D C C D C C D C C D C C Approach Vol, veh/h 910 905 1461 916 Approach Delay, s/veh 34.9 30.2 28.1 26.4 Approach LOS C C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.1 30.0 12.9 24.2 11.6 32.4 10.9 26.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.5 25.5 10.5 22.5 12.8 26.2 12.1 20.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.6 17.3 8.2 17.5 7.5 11.1 6.9 12.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 5.0 0.2 2.2 0.1 4.3 0.1 2.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 29.7 HCM 6th LOS C HCM 6th TWSC 1: Barrie Road & 65th Street 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2023 pm no build.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 43 1 21 0 1 0 56 46 2 0 19 39 Future Vol, veh/h 43 1 21 0 1 0 56 46 2 0 19 39 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 47 1 23 0 1 0 61 50 2 0 21 42 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 216 216 42 227 236 51 63 0 0 52 0 0 Stage 1 42 42 - 173 173 - - - - - - - Stage 2 174 174 - 54 63 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 740 682 1029 728 665 1017 1540 - - 1554 - - Stage 1 972 860 - 829 756 - - - - - - - Stage 2 828 755 - 958 842 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 716 654 1029 689 638 1017 1540 - - 1554 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 716 654 - 689 638 - - - - - - - Stage 1 932 860 - 795 725 - - - - - - - Stage 2 793 724 - 936 842 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10 10.7 4 0 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1540 - - 793 638 1554 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.04 - - 0.089 0.002 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 - 10 10.7 0 - - HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.3 0 0 - - HCM 6th TWSC 9: 66th Street & Barrie Road 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2023 pm no build.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 32 1424 754 32 0 60 Future Vol, veh/h 32 1424 754 32 0 60 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 35 1548 820 35 0 65 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 855 0 - 0 - 428 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 5.34 - - - - 7.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.12 - - - - 3.92 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 460 - - - 0 492 Stage 1 - - - - 0 - Stage 2 - - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 460 - - - - 492 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 0 13.4 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 460 - - - 492 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.076 - - - 0.133 HCM Control Delay (s) 13.5 - - - 13.4 HCM Lane LOS B - - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - - 0.5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: York Avenue & 66th Street 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2023 pm no build.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 531 748 201 311 414 108 188 723 341 88 482 190 Future Volume (veh/h) 531 748 201 311 414 108 188 723 341 88 482 190 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 577 813 0 338 450 117 204 786 371 96 524 207 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 677 967 421 703 314 287 1144 510 123 1093 488 Arrive On Green 0.20 0.27 0.00 0.12 0.20 0.20 0.08 0.32 0.32 0.07 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3554 1585 3456 3554 1585 3456 3554 1585 1781 3554 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 577 813 0 338 450 117 204 786 371 96 524 207 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1777 1585 1728 1777 1585 1728 1777 1585 1781 1777 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.5 18.0 0.0 8.0 9.7 5.3 4.8 16.1 17.3 4.4 10.0 8.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.5 18.0 0.0 8.0 9.7 5.3 4.8 16.1 17.3 4.4 10.0 8.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 677 967 421 703 314 287 1144 510 123 1093 488 V/C Ratio(X) 0.85 0.84 0.80 0.64 0.37 0.71 0.69 0.73 0.78 0.48 0.42 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 806 1101 480 765 341 418 1144 510 162 1093 488 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.4 28.7 0.0 35.7 30.8 29.0 37.3 24.7 25.1 38.3 23.5 23.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.6 5.4 0.0 8.6 1.6 0.7 3.2 3.4 8.8 16.3 1.5 2.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 6.2 8.1 0.0 3.8 4.2 2.0 2.1 7.0 7.5 2.5 4.3 3.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 40.0 34.1 0.0 44.3 32.4 29.8 40.6 28.1 33.9 54.6 25.0 25.7 LnGrp LOS D C D C C D C C D C C Approach Vol, veh/h 1390 A 905 1361 827 Approach Delay, s/veh 36.5 36.5 31.5 28.6 Approach LOS D D C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.3 31.4 14.7 27.2 11.4 30.2 20.9 21.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 7.6 26.9 11.6 25.9 10.1 24.4 19.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.4 19.3 10.0 20.0 6.8 12.0 15.5 11.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.0 0.2 2.7 0.2 3.4 0.9 1.8 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 33.5 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: France Ave & 65th Street 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2023 pm build.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 139 84 108 56 100 392 37 1182 84 91 748 32 Future Volume (veh/h) 139 84 108 56 100 392 37 1182 84 91 748 32 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 151 91 117 61 109 0 40 1285 0 99 813 35 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 315 155 200 125 189 479 2731 376 2799 120 Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.04 0.53 0.00 0.06 0.56 0.56 Sat Flow, veh/h 1284 743 955 262 904 1585 1781 5274 0 1781 5020 216 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 151 0 208 170 0 0 40 1285 0 99 551 297 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1284 0 1698 1166 0 1585 1781 1702 0 1781 1702 1832 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 0.0 7.7 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.7 10.9 0.0 1.6 5.9 6.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.9 0.0 7.7 10.8 0.0 0.0 0.7 10.9 0.0 1.6 5.9 6.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.56 0.36 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.12 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 315 0 355 314 0 479 2731 376 1898 1021 V/C Ratio(X) 0.48 0.00 0.59 0.54 0.00 0.08 0.47 0.26 0.29 0.29 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 647 0 795 714 0 546 2731 510 1898 1021 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.0 0.0 24.7 25.5 0.0 0.0 6.6 10.0 0.0 7.1 8.1 8.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.1 0.0 1.5 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.3 0.0 3.1 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.2 3.6 0.0 0.5 2.0 2.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 27.1 0.0 26.3 27.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 10.6 0.0 7.5 8.5 8.8 LnGrp LOS C A C C A A B A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 359 170 A 1325 A 947 Approach Delay, s/veh 26.6 27.0 10.5 8.5 Approach LOS C C B A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.8 41.6 19.0 7.2 43.2 19.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.5 34.5 32.5 5.3 38.7 32.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.6 12.9 12.9 2.7 8.0 12.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 9.9 1.7 0.0 6.4 0.9 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.9 HCM 6th LOS B Notes Unsignalized Delay for [NBR, WBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 5: France Ave & 66th Street 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2023 pm build.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 100 658 79 254 375 210 113 1011 222 157 601 85 Future Volume (veh/h) 100 658 79 254 375 210 113 1011 222 157 601 85 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 109 715 86 276 408 228 123 1099 241 171 653 92 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 140 863 385 362 956 426 157 1601 497 210 1555 217 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.24 0.24 0.10 0.27 0.27 0.09 0.31 0.31 0.12 0.34 0.34 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1585 3456 3554 1585 1781 5106 1585 1781 4530 631 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 109 715 86 276 408 228 123 1099 241 171 489 256 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1728 1777 1585 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1757 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.9 15.5 3.5 6.3 7.7 10.0 5.5 15.3 10.0 7.6 9.0 9.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.9 15.5 3.5 6.3 7.7 10.0 5.5 15.3 10.0 7.6 9.0 9.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.36 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 140 863 385 362 956 426 157 1601 497 210 1168 603 V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.83 0.22 0.76 0.43 0.53 0.79 0.69 0.48 0.82 0.42 0.42 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 265 983 438 446 956 426 280 1601 497 296 1168 603 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.8 29.2 24.7 35.4 24.6 25.4 36.3 24.4 22.6 35.0 20.5 20.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.0 5.4 0.3 6.1 0.3 1.3 8.4 2.4 3.4 11.3 1.1 2.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.4 7.0 1.3 2.9 3.2 3.8 2.7 6.3 4.0 3.9 3.6 4.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 45.8 34.6 24.9 41.5 24.9 26.7 44.7 26.8 26.0 46.4 21.6 22.7 LnGrp LOS D C C D C C D C C D C C Approach Vol, veh/h 910 912 1463 916 Approach Delay, s/veh 35.0 30.4 28.2 26.5 Approach LOS D C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.1 30.0 13.0 24.2 11.7 32.4 10.9 26.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.5 25.5 10.5 22.5 12.8 26.2 12.1 20.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.6 17.3 8.3 17.5 7.5 11.1 6.9 12.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 5.0 0.2 2.2 0.1 4.3 0.1 2.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 29.8 HCM 6th LOS C HCM 6th TWSC 1: Barrie Road & 65th Street 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2023 pm build.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 43 1 44 0 1 0 73 46 2 0 19 39 Future Vol, veh/h 43 1 44 0 1 0 73 46 2 0 19 39 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 47 1 48 0 1 0 79 50 2 0 21 42 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 252 252 42 276 272 51 63 0 0 52 0 0 Stage 1 42 42 - 209 209 - - - - - - - Stage 2 210 210 - 67 63 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 701 651 1029 676 635 1017 1540 - - 1554 - - Stage 1 972 860 - 793 729 - - - - - - - Stage 2 792 728 - 943 842 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 672 616 1029 618 601 1017 1540 - - 1554 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 672 616 - 618 601 - - - - - - - Stage 1 920 860 - 751 690 - - - - - - - Stage 2 749 689 - 898 842 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10 11 4.5 0 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1540 - - 812 601 1554 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.052 - - 0.118 0.002 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - 10 11 0 - - HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.4 0 0 - - HCM 6th TWSC 9: 66th Street & Barrie Road 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2023 pm build.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 39 1424 754 36 0 100 Future Vol, veh/h 39 1424 754 36 0 100 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 42 1548 820 39 0 109 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 859 0 - 0 - 430 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 5.34 - - - - 7.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.12 - - - - 3.92 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 458 - - - 0 490 Stage 1 - - - - 0 - Stage 2 - - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 458 - - - - 490 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 0 14.4 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 458 - - - 490 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.093 - - - 0.222 HCM Control Delay (s) 13.7 - - - 14.4 HCM Lane LOS B - - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - - 0.8 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: York Avenue & 66th Street 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2023 pm build.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 532 752 202 311 416 108 189 723 341 88 482 191 Future Volume (veh/h) 532 752 202 311 416 108 189 723 341 88 482 191 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 578 817 0 338 452 117 205 786 371 96 524 208 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 678 970 420 705 314 288 1142 510 123 1091 487 Arrive On Green 0.20 0.27 0.00 0.12 0.20 0.20 0.08 0.32 0.32 0.07 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3554 1585 3456 3554 1585 3456 3554 1585 1781 3554 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 578 817 0 338 452 117 205 786 371 96 524 208 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1777 1585 1728 1777 1585 1728 1777 1585 1781 1777 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.5 18.2 0.0 8.0 9.8 5.3 4.8 16.1 17.4 4.4 10.0 8.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.5 18.2 0.0 8.0 9.8 5.3 4.8 16.1 17.4 4.4 10.0 8.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 678 970 420 705 314 288 1142 510 123 1091 487 V/C Ratio(X) 0.85 0.84 0.80 0.64 0.37 0.71 0.69 0.73 0.78 0.48 0.43 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 805 1100 479 764 341 417 1142 510 162 1091 487 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.5 28.7 0.0 35.8 30.8 29.0 37.4 24.7 25.2 38.3 23.6 23.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.7 5.5 0.0 8.6 1.6 0.7 3.2 3.4 8.8 16.4 1.5 2.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 6.2 8.2 0.0 3.8 4.2 2.1 2.1 7.0 7.5 2.5 4.3 3.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 40.1 34.2 0.0 44.4 32.4 29.8 40.6 28.1 34.0 54.7 25.1 25.9 LnGrp LOS D C D C C D C C D C C Approach Vol, veh/h 1395 A 907 1362 828 Approach Delay, s/veh 36.7 36.5 31.6 28.7 Approach LOS D D C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.3 31.4 14.7 27.3 11.5 30.2 20.9 21.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 7.6 26.9 11.6 25.9 10.1 24.4 19.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.4 19.4 10.0 20.2 6.8 12.0 15.5 11.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.9 0.2 2.7 0.2 3.4 0.9 1.8 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 33.6 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th TWSC 14: access & 65th Street 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2023 pm build.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 69 4 8 105 9 20 Future Vol, veh/h 69 4 8 105 9 20 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 75 4 9 114 10 22 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 79 0 209 77 Stage 1 - - - - 77 - Stage 2 - - - - 132 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1519 - 779 984 Stage 1 - - - - 946 - Stage 2 - - - - 894 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1519 - 774 984 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 774 - Stage 1 - - - - 946 - Stage 2 - - - - 889 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.5 9.1 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 908 - - 1519 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.035 - - 0.006 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.1 - - 7.4 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 17: Barrie Road & access 09/15/2021 U:\227704227\technical\227704227 6500 Barrie Road\synchro\2023 pm build.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 20 8 112 60 3 Future Vol, veh/h 9 20 8 112 60 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 10 22 9 122 65 3 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 207 67 68 0 - 0 Stage 1 67 - - - - - Stage 2 140 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 781 997 1533 - - - Stage 1 956 - - - - - Stage 2 887 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 776 997 1533 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 776 - - - - - Stage 1 950 - - - - - Stage 2 887 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.1 0.5 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1533 - 916 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - 0.034 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 9.1 - - HCM Lane LOS A A A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 - - Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cBHATTI GI MEDICAL 6500 BARRIE ROAD, EDINA, MN 55435 915 CASCADE DRIVE, CHASKA, MN 55318 TERRAIN HOLDINGS LLC. PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER: 21004............08/20/21 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:MW,RB,PSJD, PS..............202124904Patrick J. SarverLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.08/20/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC0.0TITLE SHEET............BHATTI GI MEDICALEDINA, MINNESOTASHEET INDEXSHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLEC0.0 TITLE SHEETSITE LOCATIONSITE LOCATION MAPNSITE SURVEYV1.0UTILITY PLANC4.0ISSUED FOR: CITY SUBMITTALDEVELOPER / PROPERTY OWNER:BHATTI EDINA PROPERTIES, LLC1447 WHITE OAK DRIVECHASKA, MN 55318CONTACT: DR. AHSAN BHATTI, SARA BHATTIENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:CIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35TH STREETSUITE 200ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CONTACT: PATRICK SARVER952-250-2000SURVEYOR:GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER:SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONSSW1.0GRADING PLANC3.0C5.0C5.1L1.0CIVIL DETAILSLANDSCAPE PLANSWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONSSW1.1SWPPP - DETAILSSW1.2C2.0 SITE PLANSWPPP - NARRATIVESW1.3CIVIL DETAILSC1.0 REMOVALS PLANKnow what'sRTBDARCHITECT:POPE ARCHITECTS INC.1295 BANDANA BLVD N.ST. PAUL, MN 55108CONTACT: DON ROLF(651)-789-1628CIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35TH STREETSUITE 200ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CONTACT: RORY SYNSTELIEN612-615-0060 48.280.0 80.0 48.0Two Story Brick & Stucco BuildingFoundation Area=3,846 Sq. Ft. +/-Building AboveBuilding Above11202511711MulchMulchMulchLandscape RockMulchMulch PylonSign47.7 48.147.6 47.4 47.5 48.2N00°25'09"W 321.78N89°44'41"W 103.04S00°24'45"E 321.78 S89°44'41"E 103.08S89°44'41"E 103.08N Line of the S 268 Feetof Lot 5, Block 4, SOUTHDALE ACRESPID: 2902824200326500 Barrie RdBARRIE ROAD (A Public R/W)65TH STREET WEST(A Public R/W)[10]Public Street Easementper Doc. No. 768944291.78 291.78 30.00 30.00 12" VCP12" VCP9" VCP9" VCP San. Serv.Per FieldMarkings8" CIP2" WaterServ.Per Rec.4" WaterServ.Per Rec.REMOVALS LEGEND:Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cBHATTI GI MEDICAL 6500 BARRIE ROAD, EDINA, MN 55435 915 CASCADE DRIVE, CHASKA, MN 55318 TERRAIN HOLDINGS LLC. PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER: 21004............08/20/21 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:MW,RB,PSJD, PS..............202124904Patrick J. SarverLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.08/20/21NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC1.0REMOVALS PLAN............Know what'sRREMOVAL NOTES:CITY OF EDINA REMOVAL NOTES: SW1.0 - SW1.3EROSION CONTROL NOTES:DLTREE PROTECTIONN T S25'DRIPLINE WIDTHPOSTS AND FENCINGEXTEND FENCE 25'BEYOND DRIPLINEWHERE POSSIBLETREE PROTECTION SIGN, TYP.TREE DRIPLINE, ORCONSTRUCTION LIMITS1 N00°25'09"W 321.78N89°44'41"W 103.04S00°24'45"E 321.78 S89°44'41"E 103.08S89°44'41"E 103.0830.00 30.00 Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cBHATTI GI MEDICAL 6500 BARRIE ROAD, EDINA, MN 55435 915 CASCADE DRIVE, CHASKA, MN 55318 TERRAIN HOLDINGS LLC. PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER: 21004............08/20/21 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:MW,RB,PSJD, PS..............202124904Patrick J. SarverLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.08/20/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.0SITE PLAN............SITE AREA TABLE:SITE LAYOUT NOTES:SITE PLAN LEGEND:NKnow what'sRCITY OF EDINA SITE SPECIFIC NOTES:OPERATIONAL NOTES:SNOW REMOVALALL SNOW SHALL BE STORED ON-SITE INLANDSCAPED AREAS.TRASH REMOVAL:TRASH BINS SHALL BE STORED INSIDE GARAGE.ACCESSED AND EMPTIED BY COMMERCIALCOMPANY ON TRASH REMOVAL DAY.DELIVERIES:DELIVERIES SHALL OCCUR AT THE FRONTDOOR VIA STANDARD COMMERCIAL DELIVERYVEHICLES (UPS, FED-EX, USPS). N00°25'09"W 321.78N89°44'41"W 103.04S00°24'45"E 321.78 S89°44'41"E 103.08S89°44'41"E 103.08N Line of the S 268 Feetof Lot 5, Block 4, SOUTHDALE ACRESPID: 2902824200326500 Barrie RdBARRIE ROAD (A Public R/W)65TH STREET WEST(A Public R/W)[10]Public Street Easementper Doc. No. 76894430.00 30.00 12" VCP12" VCP9" VCP9" VCP San. Serv.Per FieldMarkings8" CIP2" WaterServ.Per Rec.4" WaterServ.Per Rec.Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cBHATTI GI MEDICAL 6500 BARRIE ROAD, EDINA, MN 55435 915 CASCADE DRIVE, CHASKA, MN 55318 TERRAIN HOLDINGS LLC. PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER: 21004............08/20/21 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:MW,RB,PSJD, PS..............202124904Patrick J. SarverLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.08/20/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC3.0GRADING PLAN............GENERAL GRADING NOTES:GRADING PLAN LEGEND:CITY OF EDINA GRADING NOTES: SW1.0 - SW1.3EROSION CONTROL NOTES:NKnow what'sREOF=1135.52 N00°25'09"W 321.78N89°44'41"W 103.04S00°24'45"E 321.78 S89°44'41"E 103.08S89°44'41"E 103.08N Line of the S 268 Feetof Lot 5, Block 4, SOUTHDALE ACRESPID: 2902824200326500 Barrie RdBARRIE ROAD (A Public R/W)65TH STREET WEST(A Public R/W)[10]Public Street Easementper Doc. No. 76894430.00 30.00 12" VCP12" VCP9" VCP9" VCP San. Serv.Per FieldMarkings8" CIP2" WaterServ.Per Rec.4" WaterServ.Per Rec.REUSE EXISTING 2"DOMESTIC WATER SERVICEAND VALVE, STUB TOWITHIN 5' FROM BUILDING,COORD. W/MECH'LREUSE EXISTING 6"SANITARY SERVICE,STUB TO WITHIN 5' FROMBUILDING, COORD.W/MECH'LREUSE EXISTING 4" FIRESERVICE AND EXISTING PIVSTUB TO WITHIN 5' FROMBUILDING, COORD.W/MECH'LDISCHARGE STORMWATER TO GRADEFL= 884.35 (12" ABOVE FG)FG=883.35TRENCH DRAINRIM=872.52CONNECT TO BUILDING STORMSERVICE, COORD. W/MECH'LCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cBHATTI GI MEDICAL 6500 BARRIE ROAD, EDINA, MN 55435 915 CASCADE DRIVE, CHASKA, MN 55318 TERRAIN HOLDINGS LLC. PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER: 21004............08/20/21 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:MW,RB,PSJD, PS..............202155988Joseph DiederichsLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.08/20/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC4.0UTILITY PLAN............GENERAL UTILITY NOTES:UTILITY LEGEND:CITY OF EDINA UTILITY NOTES:NKnow what'sR Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cBHATTI GI MEDICAL 6500 BARRIE ROAD, EDINA, MN 55435 915 CASCADE DRIVE, CHASKA, MN 55318 TERRAIN HOLDINGS LLC. PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:21004. .. .. .. .. .. .08/20/21 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:MW,RB,PSJD, PS. .. .. .. .. .. .. .202124904Patrick J. SarverLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.08/20/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.3SWPPP - NARRATIVE. .. .. .. .. .. .OWNER INFORMATIONTRAINING SECTION 21PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PERMANENTSTORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMPERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IS NOT REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT TO MEET NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. THEPROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPOSED STORMWATER SYSTEM.AREAS AND QUANTITIES:SWPPP CONTACT PERSONCONTRACTOR:SWPPP INSPECTOR TRAINING:ALL SWPPP INSPECTIONS MUST BE PERFORMED BY APERSON THAT MEETS THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THENPDES CONSTRUCTION SITE PERMIT.TRAINING CREDENTIALS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THECONTRACTOR AND KEPT ON SITE WITH THE SWPPPNOTE: QUANTITIES ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE FOR THEMSELVES THE EXACTQUANTITIES FOR BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION.PROJECT NARRATIVE:PROJECT IS A REDEVELOPMENT OF AN EXISTING BUILDING INTO A NEW MEDICAL BUILDING. SITE AND LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WILL OCCUR.NATIVE BUFFER NARRATIVE:PRESERVING A 50' NATURAL BUFFER AROUND WATER BODIES IS NOT REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT BECAUSE WATER BODIES ARE NOTLOCATED ON SITE.INFILTRATION NARRATIVE:INFILTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED AS PART OF THE PROJECT BECAUSE PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT IS NOT REQUIRED.SOIL CONTAMINATION NARRATIVE:SOILS ONSITE HAVE NOT BEEN IDENTIFIED AS CONTAMINATED. AN MPCA SOILS ASSESSMENT WAS COMPLETED AND IT WAS DETERMINED THATTHIS SITE IS APPROPRIATE FOR INFILTRATION.SPECIAL TMDL BMP REQUIREMENTS SITE SPECIFIC (IF REQUIRED):THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN ONE MILE AND DISCHARGES TO BOTH MEDICINE LAKE AND NORTHWOOD LAKE - MEDICINE LAKE AND NORTHWOOD LAKEARE IDENTIFIED AS IMPAIRED WATER BODIES PER THE MPCA'S 303(D) IMPAIRED WATERS LIST. MEDICINE LAKE AND NORTHWOOD LAKE AREIMPAIRED FOR NUTRIENT EUTROPHICATION BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS. BECAUSE THESE WATERS ARE LOCATED WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE SITE,BMPS AS DEFINED IN THE NPDES PERMIT ITEMS 23.9 AND 23.10 APPLY. THESE ARE AS FOLLOWS:1.DURING CONSTRUCTION:A.STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION BUT IN NO CASE COMPLETEDLATER THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLYCEASED.B.TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 14. MUST BE USED FOR COMMON DRAINAGE LOCATIONS THATSERVE AN AREA WITH FIVE (5) OR MORE ACRES DISTURBED AT ONE TIME.PERMANENT STABILIZATION NOTES SITE SPECIFIC:PERMANENT SEED MIX·FOR THIS PROJECT ALL AREAS THAT ARE NOT TO BE SODDED OR LANDSCAPED SHALL RECEIVE A NATIVE PERMANENT SEED MIX.··AREAS IN BUFFERS AND ADJACENT TO OR IN WET AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 (STORMWATER SOUTH AND WEST) AT 35 LBS PERACRE.··DRY AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 35-221 (DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL) AT 40 LBS PER ACRE.·MAINTENANCE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL.SUPPLEMENTARY SITE SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES:THESE NOTES SUPERCEDE ANY GENERAL SWPPP NOTES.THIS PROJECT IS LESS THAN 1.0 ACRES SO AN NPDES PERMIT IS NOT REQUIRED AND DOEDS NOT NEED TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA.THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES IN THE NPDES PERMIT THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION.SWPPP ATTACHMENTS (ONLY APPLICABLE IF SITE IS 1 ACRE OR GREATER):CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE FOLLOWING SWPPP ATTACHMENTS WHICH ARE A PART OF THE OVERALL SWPPP PACKAGE:ATTACHMENT A. CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE - SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENTATTACHMENT B. CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLISTATTACHMENT C. MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMSATTACHMENT D: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.ATTACHMENT E: GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.DESIGN ENGINEER: MATTHEW R. PAVEK P.E.TRAINING COURSE: DESIGN OF SWPPPTRAINING ENTITY: UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAINSTRUCTOR: JOHN CHAPMANDATES OF TRAINING COURSE: 5/15/2011 - 5/16/2011TOTAL TRAINING HOURS: 12RE-CERTIFICATION: 2/27/2020 (8 HOURS), EXP. 5/31/2023THE CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH A CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT DISTURBS SITE SOIL OR WHOIMPLEMENT A POLLUTANT CONTROL MEASURE IDENTIFIED IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) MUSTCOMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT (DATEDAUGUST 1, 2018 # MNR100001) AND ANY LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION CONCERNING EROSION AND SEDIMENTATIONCONTROL.STORMWATER DISCHARGE DESIGN REQUIREMENTSSWPPPTHE NATURE OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IS REPRESENTED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS. SEE THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS AND SWPPP NARRATIVE (ATTACHMENT A: CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE) FORADDITIONAL SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP INFORMATION. THE PLANS SHOW LOCATIONS AND TYPES OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENTEROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S. STANDARD DETAILS ARE ATTACHED TO THIS SWPPP DOCUMENT.THE INTENDED SEQUENCING OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IS AS FOLLOWS:1. INSTALL STABILIZED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE2. INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE AROUND SITE3. INSTALL ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING AROUND INFILTRATION AREAS4. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT ALL ADJACENT AND DOWNSTREAM CATCH BASINS5. CLEAR AND GRUB FOR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND INSTALL6. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND (SECTION 14)7. CLEAR AND GRUB REMAINDER OF SITE8. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL9. ROUGH GRADING OF SITE10. STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS AND STOCKPILES11. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN STORM SEWER AND SERVICES12. INSTALL SILT FENCE / INLET PROTECTION AROUND CB'S13. INSTALL STREET SECTION14. INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER15. BITUMINOUS ON STREETS16. FINAL GRADE BOULEVARD, INSTALL SEED AND MULCH17. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM BASIN / POND18. FINAL GRADE POND / INFILTRATION BASINS (DO NOT COMPACT SOILS IN INFILTRATION AREAS.)19. WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED BY EITHER SEED OR SOD/LANDSCAPING, REMOVESILT FENCE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL.RECORDS RETENTION:THE SWPPP (ORIGINAL OR COPIES) INCLUDING, ALL CHANGES TO IT, AND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE KEPT ATTHE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION BY THE PERMITTEE WHO HAS OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THAT PORTION OF THE SITE. THE SWPPPCAN BE KEPT IN EITHER THE FIELD OFFICE OR IN AN ON SITE VEHICLE DURING NORMAL WORKING HOURS.ALL OWNER(S) MUST KEEP THE SWPPP, ALONG WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL RECORDS, ON FILE FOR THREE (3) YEARS AFTERSUBMITTAL OF THE NOT AS OUTLINED IN SECTION 4. THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY RECORDS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT.1.THE FINAL SWPPP;2.ANY OTHER STORMWATER RELATED PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT;3.RECORDS OF ALL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION (SEE SECTION 11, INSPECTIONS ANDMAINTENANCE);4.ALL PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED, INCLUDING ALL RIGHT OF WAY,CONTRACTS, COVENANTS AND OTHER BINDING REQUIREMENTS REGARDING PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE; AND5.ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGN OF THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS.SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBILITIES:1.THE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ARE PERMITTEE(S) AS IDENTIFIED BY THE NPDES PERMIT.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ON-SITE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE ACTIVITIES OF ALL OFTHE CONTRACTOR'S SUBCONTRACTORS.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A PERSON(S) KNOWLEDGEABLE AND EXPERIENCED IN THE APPLICATION OF EROSION PREVENTIONAND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO OVERSEE ALL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF BMPS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THESWPPP.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PERSON(S) MEETING THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT TO CONDUCTINSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEREQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT. ONE OF THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR AN ONSITE INSPECTION WITHIN 72 HOURSUPON REQUEST BY MPCA. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TRAINING DOCUMENTATION FOR THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) AS REQUIRED BYTHE NPDES PERMIT. THIS TRAINING DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE RECORDED IN OR WITH THE SWPPP BEFORE THE START OFCONSTRUCTION OR AS SOON AS THE PERSONNEL FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN DETERMINED. DOCUMENTATION SHALL INCLUDE:4.1.NAMES OF THE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE TRAINED PER SECTION 21 OFTHE PERMIT.4.2.DATES OF TRAINING AND NAME OF INSTRUCTOR AND ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING.4.3.CONTENT OF TRAINING COURSE OR WORKSHOP INCLUDING THE NUMBER OF HOURS OF TRAINING.5.FOLLOWING FINAL STABILIZATION AND THE TERMINATION OF COVERAGE FOR THE NPDES PERMIT, THE OWNER IS EXPECTED TOFURNISH LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (O & M) OF THE PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTSSWPPP AMENDMENTS (SECTION 6):1.ONE OF THE INDIVIDUALS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 21.2.A OR ITEM 21.2.B OR ANOTHER QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL MUST COMPLETE ALLSWPPP CHANGES. CHANGES INVOLVING THE USE OF A LESS STRINGENT BMP MUST INCLUDE A JUSTIFICATION DESCRIBING HOWTHE REPLACEMENT BMP IS EFFECTIVE FOR THE SITE CHARACTERISTICS.2.PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TO CORRECT PROBLEMSIDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE,WEATHER OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS HAVING A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERSOR GROUNDWATER.3.PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TO CORRECT PROBLEMSIDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER INSPECTIONS OR INVESTIGATIONS BY THE SITE OWNER OR OPERATOR, USEPAOR MPCA OFFICIALS INDICATE THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE IN ELIMINATING OR SIGNIFICANTLY MINIMIZING THE DISCHARGE OFPOLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER OR THE DISCHARGES ARE CAUSING WATER QUALITY STANDARDEXCEEDANCES (E.G., NUISANCE CONDITIONS AS DEFINED IN MINN. R. 7050.0210, SUBP. 2) OR THE SWPPP IS NOT CONSISTENT WITHTHE OBJECTIVES OF A USEPA APPROVED TMDL.BMP SELECTION AND INSTALLATION (SECTION 7):1.PERMITTEES MUST SELECT, INSTALL, AND MAINTAIN THE BMPS IDENTIFIED IN THE SWPPP AND IN THIS PERMIT IN AN APPROPRIATEAND FUNCTIONAL MANNER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH RELEVANT MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AND ACCEPTED ENGINEERINGPRACTICES.EROSION PREVENTION (SECTION 8):1.BEFORE WORK BEGINS, PERMITTEES MUST DELINEATE THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED.2.PERMITTEES MUST MINIMIZE THE NEED FOR DISTURBANCE OF PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT WITH STEEP SLOPES. WHEN STEEPSLOPES MUST BE DISTURBED, PERMITTEES MUST USE TECHNIQUES SUCH AS PHASING AND STABILIZATION PRACTICES DESIGNEDFOR STEEP SLOPES (E.G., SLOPE DRAINING AND TERRACING).3.PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS, INCLUDING STOCKPILES. STABILIZATION MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELYTO LIMIT SOIL EROSION WHEN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY OR TEMPORARILY CEASED ON ANY PORTION OF THESITE AND WILL NOT RESUME FOR A PERIOD EXCEEDING 14 CALENDAR DAYS. STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ON CONSTRUCTED BASECOMPONENTS OF ROADS, PARKING LOTS AND SIMILAR SURFACES. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ON TEMPORARY STOCKPILESWITHOUT SIGNIFICANT SILT, CLAY OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS (E.G., CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCKPILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETESTOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES) BUT PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT THE BASE OF THE STOCKPILE.4.FOR PUBLIC WATERS THAT THE MINNESOTA DNR HAS PROMULGATED "WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS" DURING SPECIFIED FISHSPAWNING TIME FRAMES, PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THEWATER'S EDGE, AND THAT DRAIN TO THESE WATERS, WITHIN 24 HOURS DURING THE RESTRICTION PERIOD.5.PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF THE LAST 200 LINEAR FEET OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENTDRAINAGE DITCHES OR SWALES THAT DRAIN WATER FROM THE SITE WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATEROR PROPERTY EDGE. PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF REMAINING PORTIONS OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENTDITCHES OR SWALES WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER OR PROPERTY EDGE ANDCONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASES.6.TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM DURING CONSTRUCTION(WITH PROPERLY DESIGNED ROCK-DITCH CHECKS, BIO ROLLS, SILT DIKES, ETC.) DO NOT NEED TO BE STABILIZED. PERMITTEESMUST STABILIZE THESE AREAS WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER THEIR USE AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM CEASES7.PERMITTEES MUST NOT USE MULCH, HYDROMULCH, TACKIFIER, POLYACRYLAMIDE OR SIMILAR EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICESWITHIN ANY PORTION OF THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALESECTION WITH A CONTINUOUS SLOPE OF GREATER THAN 2 PERCENT.8.PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION AT ALL PIPE OUTLETS WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTERCONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER OR PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM.9.PERMITTEES MUST NOT DISTURB MORE LAND (I.E., PHASING) THAN CAN BE EFFECTIVELY INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED INACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 11.SEDIMENT CONTROL (SECTION 9):1.PERMITTEES MUST ESTABLISH SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS ON ALL DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETERS OF THE SITE AND DOWNGRADIENTAREAS OF THE SITE THAT DRAIN TO ANY SURFACE WATER, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS. PERMITTEES MUST LOCATESEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES UPGRADIENT OF ANY BUFFER ZONES. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROLPRACTICES BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENT LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN AND MUST KEEP THE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICESIN PLACE UNTIL THEY ESTABLISH PERMANENT COVER.2.IF DOWNGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE OVERLOADED, BASED ON FREQUENT FAILURE OR EXCESSIVE MAINTENANCEREQUIREMENTS, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL ADDITIONAL UPGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES OR REDUNDANT BMPS TOELIMINATE THE OVERLOADING AND AMEND THE SWPPP TO IDENTIFY THESE ADDITIONAL PRACTICES AS REQUIRED IN ITEM 6.3.3.TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES AND SEDIMENT BASINS DESIGNED AS PART OF A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENTSYSTEM (E.G., DITCHES WITH ROCK-CHECK DAMS) REQUIRE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ONLY AS APPROPRIATE FOR SITECONDITIONS.4.A FLOATING SILT CURTAIN PLACED IN THE WATER IS NOT A SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP TO SATISFY ITEM 9.2 EXCEPT WHEN WORKINGON A SHORELINE OR BELOW THE WATERLINE. IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SHORT TERM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (E.G.,INSTALLATION OF RIP RAP ALONG THE SHORELINE) IN THAT AREA IS COMPLETE, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL AN UPLANDPERIMETER CONTROL PRACTICE IF EXPOSED SOILS STILL DRAIN TO A SURFACE WATER.5.PERMITTEES MUST RE-INSTALL ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ADJUSTED OR REMOVED TO ACCOMMODATE SHORT-TERMACTIVITIES SUCH AS CLEARING OR GRUBBING, OR PASSAGE OF VEHICLES, IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY ISCOMPLETED. PERMITTEES MUST RE-INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES BEFORE THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT EVEN IFTHE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE.6.PERMITTEES MUST PROTECT ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS USING APPROPRIATE BMPS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL THEYESTABLISH PERMANENT COVER ON ALL AREAS WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET.7.PERMITTEES MAY REMOVE INLET PROTECTION FOR A PARTICULAR INLET IF A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN (E.G. STREETFLOODING/FREEZING) IS IDENTIFIED BY THE PERMITTEES OR THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY (E.G.,CITY/COUNTY/TOWNSHIP/MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER). PERMITTEES MUST DOCUMENT THE NEEDFOR REMOVAL IN THE SWPPP.8.PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT THE BASE OF STOCKPILES ON THEDOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER.9.PERMITTEES MUST LOCATE STOCKPILES OUTSIDE OF NATURAL BUFFERS OR SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORMWATERCONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS UNLESS THERE IS A BYPASS IN PLACE FOR THE STORMWATER. 10. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL A VEHICLE TRACKING BMP TO MINIMIZE THE TRACK OUT OF SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITEOR ONTO PAVED ROADS WITHIN THE SITE. 11. PERMITTEES MUST USE STREET SWEEPING IF VEHICLE TRACKING BMPS ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT TRACKINGONTO THE STREET. 12. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 14. 13. IN ANY AREAS OF THE SITE WHERE FINAL VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION WILL OCCUR, PERMITTEES MUST RESTRICT VEHICLE ANDEQUIPMENT USE TO MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION. 14. PERMITTEES MUST PRESERVE TOPSOIL ON THE SITE, UNLESS INFEASIBLE. 15. PERMITTEES MUST DIRECT DISCHARGES FROM BMPS TO VEGETATED AREAS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. 16. PERMITTEES MUST PRESERVE A 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER OR, IF A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE ON THE SITE, PROVIDE REDUNDANT(DOUBLE) PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS WHEN A SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED WITHIN 50 FEET OF THE PROJECT'S EARTHDISTURBANCES AND STORMWATER FLOWS TO THE SURFACE WATER. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL PERIMETER SEDIMENTCONTROLS AT LEAST 5 FEET APART UNLESS LIMITED BY LACK OF AVAILABLE SPACE. NATURAL BUFFERS ARE NOT REQUIREDADJACENT TO ROAD DITCHES, JUDICIAL DITCHES, COUNTY DITCHES, STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS, STORM DRAININLETS, AND SEDIMENT BASINS. IF PRESERVING THE BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE, PERMITTEES MUST DOCUMENT THE REASONS IN THESWPPP. SHEET PILING IS A REDUNDANT PERIMETER CONTROL IF INSTALLED IN A MANNER THAT RETAINS ALL STORMWATER. 17. PERMITTEES MUST USE POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS, OR OTHER SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS IN ACCORDANCE WITHACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES, DOSING SPECIFICATIONS AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED BYTHE MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER. THE PERMITTEES MUST USE CONVENTIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS PRIOR TOCHEMICAL ADDITION AND MUST DIRECT TREATED STORMWATER TO A SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM FOR FILTRATION ORSETTLEMENT OF THE FLOC PRIOR TO DISCHARGE.DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING (SECTION 10):1.PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE TURBID OR SEDIMENT-LADEN WATERS RELATED TO DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING (E.G.,PUMPED DISCHARGES, TRENCH/DITCH CUTS FOR DRAINAGE) TO A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENT BASIN ON THE PROJECTSITE UNLESS INFEASIBLE. PERMITTEES MAY DEWATER TO SURFACE WATERS IF THEY VISUALLY CHECK TO ENSURE ADEQUATETREATMENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED AND NUISANCE CONDITIONS (SEE MINN. R. 7050.0210, SUBP. 2) WILL NOT RESULT FROM THEDISCHARGE. IF PERMITTEES CANNOT DISCHARGE THE WATER TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING A SURFACEWATER, PERMITTEES MUST TREAT IT WITH APPROPRIATE BMPS SUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THESURFACE WATER OR DOWNSTREAM PROPERTIES.2.IF PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE WATER CONTAINING OIL OR GREASE, THEY MUST USE AN OIL-WATER SEPARATOR OR SUITABLEFILTRATION DEVICE (E.G., CARTRIDGE FILTERS, ABSORBENTS PADS) PRIOR TO DISCHARGE.3.PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE ALL WATER FROM DEWATERING OR BASIN-DRAINING ACTIVITIES IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOTCAUSE EROSION OR SCOUR IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS OR INUNDATION OF WETLANDS IN THE IMMEDIATEVICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS THAT CAUSES SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT TO THE WETLAND.4.IF PERMITTEES USE FILTERS WITH BACKWASH WATER, THEY MUST HAUL THE BACKWASH WATER AWAY FOR DISPOSAL, RETURNTHE BACKWASH WATER TO THE BEGINNING OF THE TREATMENT PROCESS, OR INCORPORATE THE BACKWASH WATER INTO THESITE IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION.INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE (SECTION 11):1.PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE A TRAINED PERSON, AS IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 21.2.B, WILL INSPECT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION SITE ATLEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATERTHAN 1/2 INCH IN 24 HOURS.2.PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT AND MAINTAIN ALL PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT BMPS.3.PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS AND POLLUTION PREVENTIONMANAGEMENT MEASURES TO ENSURE INTEGRITY AND EFFECTIVENESS. PERMITTEES MUST REPAIR, REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENTALL NONFUNCTIONAL BMPS WITH FUNCTIONAL BMPS BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY AFTER DISCOVERY UNLESSANOTHER TIME FRAME IS SPECIFIED IN ITEM 11.5 OR 11.6. PERMITTEES MAY TAKE ADDITIONAL TIME IF FIELD CONDITIONS PREVENTACCESS TO THE AREA.4.DURING EACH INSPECTION, PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE DITCHES AND CONVEYANCESYSTEMS BUT NOT CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, FOR EVIDENCE OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITION. PERMITTEES MUSTREMOVE ALL DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE WAYS, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHERDRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND RESTABILIZE THE AREAS WHERE SEDIMENT REMOVAL RESULTS IN EXPOSED SOIL. PERMITTEES MUSTCOMPLETE REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF DISCOVERY UNLESS PRECLUDED BY LEGAL,REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. PERMITTEES MUST USE ALL REASONABLE EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ACCESS. IFPRECLUDED, REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MUST TAKE PLACE WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF OBTAINING ACCESS. PERMITTEES ARERESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AUTHORITIES AND RECEIVING ANY APPLICABLEPERMITS, PRIOR TO CONDUCTING ANY WORK IN SURFACE WATERS.5.PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT CONSTRUCTION SITE VEHICLE EXIT LOCATIONS, STREETS AND CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS WITHINAND ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT FOR SEDIMENTATION FROM EROSION OR TRACKED SEDIMENT FROM VEHICLES. PERMITTEESMUST REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM ALL PAVED SURFACES WITHIN ONE (1) CALENDAR DAY OF DISCOVERY OR, IF APPLICABLE, WITHINA SHORTER TIME TO AVOID A SAFETY HAZARD TO USERS OF PUBLIC STREETS.6.PERMITTEES MUST REPAIR, REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENT ALL PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUNCTIONALOR THE SEDIMENT REACHES 1/2 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE.7.PERMITTEES MUST DRAIN TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS AND REMOVE THE SEDIMENT WHEN THE DEPTHOF SEDIMENT COLLECTED IN THE BASIN REACHES 1/2 THE STORAGE VOLUME.8.PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE THAT AT LEAST ONE INDIVIDUAL PRESENT ON THE SITE (OR AVAILABLE TO THE PROJECT SITE INTHREE (3) CALENDAR DAYS) IS TRAINED IN THE JOB DUTIES DESCRIBED IN ITEM 21.2.B.9.PERMITTEES MAY ADJUST THE INSPECTION SCHEDULE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 11.2 AS FOLLOWS:a. INSPECTIONS OF AREAS WITH PERMANENT COVER CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH, EVEN IF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITYCONTINUES ON OTHER PORTIONS OF THE SITE; ORb.WHERE SITES HAVE PERMANENT COVER ON ALL EXPOSED SOIL AND NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS OCCURRING ANYWHEREON THE SITE, INSPECTIONS CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH AND, AFTER 12 MONTHS, MAY BE SUSPENDEDCOMPLETELY UNTIL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY RESUMES. THE MPCA MAY REQUIRE INSPECTIONS TO RESUME IF CONDITIONSWARRANT; ORc.WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS BEEN SUSPENDED DUE TO FROZEN GROUND CONDITIONS, INSPECTIONS MAY BESUSPENDED. INSPECTIONS MUST RESUME WITHIN 24 HOURS OF RUNOFF OCCURRING, OR UPON RESUMING CONSTRUCTION,WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. 10. PERMITTEES MUST RECORD ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BEING CONDUCTED ANDTHESE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED WITH THE SWPPP. THESE RECORDS MUST INCLUDE:a.DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTIONS; ANDb.NAME OF PERSONS CONDUCTING INSPECTIONS; ANDc.ACCURATE FINDINGS OF INSPECTIONS, INCLUDING THE SPECIFIC LOCATION WHERE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE NEEDED; ANDd.CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN (INCLUDING DATES, TIMES, AND PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES); ANDe.DATE OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 1/2 INCHES IN 24 HOURS, AND THE AMOUNT OF RAINFALL FOR EACH EVENT.PERMITTEES MUST OBTAIN RAINFALL AMOUNTS BY EITHER A PROPERLY MAINTAINED RAIN GAUGE INSTALLED ONSITE, AWEATHER STATION THAT IS WITHIN ONE (1) MILE OF YOUR LOCATION, OR A WEATHER REPORTING SYSTEM THAT PROVIDESSITE SPECIFIC RAINFALL DATA FROM RADAR SUMMARIES; ANDf.IF PERMITTEES OBSERVE A DISCHARGE DURING THE INSPECTION, THEY MUST RECORD AND SHOULD PHOTOGRAPH ANDDESCRIBE THE LOCATION OF THE DISCHARGE (I.E., COLOR, ODOR, SETTLED OR SUSPENDED SOLIDS, OIL SHEEN, AND OTHEROBVIOUS INDICATORS OF POLLUTANTS); ANDg.ANY AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP PROPOSED AS A RESULT OF THE INSPECTION MUST BE DOCUMENTED AS REQUIRED INSECTION 6 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS.POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT (SECTION 12):1.PERMITTEES MUST PLACE BUILDING PRODUCTS AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTIC SHEETING ORTEMPORARY ROOFS) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER.PERMITTEES ARE NOT REQUIRED TO COVER OR PROTECT PRODUCTS WHICH ARE EITHER NOT A SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION TOSTORMWATER OR ARE DESIGNED TO BE EXPOSED TO STORMWATER.2.PERMITTEES MUST PLACE PESTICIDES, FERTILIZERS AND TREATMENT CHEMICALS UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTIC SHEETING ORTEMPORARY ROOFS) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER.3.PERMITTEES MUST STORE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TOXIC WASTE, (INCLUDING OIL, DIESEL FUEL, GASOLINE, HYDRAULICFLUIDS, PAINT SOLVENTS, PETROLEUM-BASED PRODUCTS, WOOD PRESERVATIVES, ADDITIVES, CURING COMPOUNDS, AND ACIDS)IN SEALED CONTAINERS TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTEMATERIALS MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7045 INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AS APPLICABLE.4.PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY STORE, COLLECT AND DISPOSE SOLID WASTE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7035.5.PERMITTEES MUST POSITION PORTABLE TOILETS SO THEY ARE SECURE AND WILL NOT TIP OR BE KNOCKED OVER. PERMITTEESMUST PROPERLY DISPOSE SANITARY WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7041.6.PERMITTEES MUST TAKE REASONABLE STEPS TO PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF SPILLED OR LEAKED CHEMICALS, INCLUDING FUEL,FROM ANY AREA WHERE CHEMICALS OR FUEL WILL BE LOADED OR UNLOADED INCLUDING THE USE OF DRIP PANS ORABSORBENTS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE ADEQUATE SUPPLIES ARE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES TO CLEAN UPDISCHARGED MATERIALS AND THAT AN APPROPRIATE DISPOSAL METHOD IS AVAILABLE FOR RECOVERED SPILLED MATERIALS.PERMITTEES MUST REPORT AND CLEAN UP SPILLS IMMEDIATELY AS REQUIRED BY MINN. STAT. 115.061, USING DRY CLEAN UPMEASURES WHERE POSSIBLE.7.PERMITTEES MUST LIMIT VEHICLE EXTERIOR WASHING AND EQUIPMENT TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. PERMITTEES MUSTCONTAIN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHING AREA IN A SEDIMENT BASIN OR OTHER SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE CONTROLS AND MUSTDISPOSE WASTE FROM THE WASHING ACTIVITY PROPERLY. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY USE AND STORE SOAPS, DETERGENTS,OR SOLVENTS.8.PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONTAINMENT FOR ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BY WASHOUTOPERATIONS (E.G., CONCRETE, STUCCO, PAINT, FORM RELEASE OILS, CURING COMPOUNDS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTIONMATERIALS) RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. PERMITTEES MUST PREVENT LIQUID AND SOLID WASHOUT WASTES FROMCONTACTING THE GROUND AND MUST DESIGN THE CONTAINMENT SO IT DOES NOT RESULT IN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHOUTOPERATIONS OR AREAS. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY DISPOSE LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA RULES.PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL A SIGN INDICATING THE LOCATION OF THE WASHOUT FACILITY.PERMIT TERMINATION (SECTION 4 AND SECTION 13):1.PERMITTEES MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER ALL TERMINATION CONDITIONS LISTED IN SECTION 13 ARE COMPLETE.2.PERMITTEES MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER SELLING OR OTHERWISE LEGALLY TRANSFERRING THE ENTIRE SITE,INCLUDING PERMIT RESPONSIBILITY FOR ROADS (E.G., STREET SWEEPING) AND STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE FINAL CLEANOUT, OR TRANSFERRING PORTIONS OF A SITE TO ANOTHER PARTY. THE PERMITTEES' COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMITTERMINATES AT MIDNIGHT ON THE SUBMISSION DATE OF THE NOT.3.PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND MUST INSTALL PERMANENT COVER OVER ALL AREAS PRIOR TOSUBMITTING THE NOT. VEGETATIVE COVER MUST CONSIST OF A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATION WITH A DENSITY OF 70PERCENT OF ITS EXPECTED FINAL GROWTH. VEGETATION IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE THE FUNCTION OF A SPECIFIC AREA DICTATESNO VEGETATION, SUCH AS IMPERVIOUS SURFACES OR THE BASE OF A SAND FILTER.4.PERMITTEES MUST CLEAN THE PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM OF ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND MUSTENSURE THE SYSTEM MEETS ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 15 THROUGH 19 AND IS OPERATING AS DESIGNED.5.PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT.6.PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS PRIOR TOSUBMITTING THE NOT. PERMITTEES MAY LEAVE BMPS DESIGNED TO DECOMPOSE ON-SITE IN PLACE.7.FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION ONLY, PERMIT COVERAGE TERMINATES ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS IF THE STRUCTURES ARE FINISHEDAND TEMPORARY EROSION PREVENTION AND DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER CONTROL IS COMPLETE, THE RESIDENCE SELLS TO THEHOMEOWNER, AND THE PERMITTEE DISTRIBUTES THE MPCA'S "HOMEOWNER FACT SHEET" TO THE HOMEOWNER.8.FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ON AGRICULTURAL LAND (E.G., PIPELINES ACROSS CROPLAND), PERMITTEES MUST RETURN THEDISTURBED LAND TO ITS PRECONSTRUCTION AGRICULTURAL USE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT.SEED NOTES:ALL SEED MIXES AND APPLICATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL.GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS:THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO SALVAGE AND PRESERVE EXISTING TOPSOIL NECESSARY FOR FINAL STABILIZATION AND TOALSO MINIMIZE COMPACTION IN ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. IMMEDIATELY BEFORE SEEDING THE SOIL SHALL BE TILLED TO A MINIMUMDEPTH OF 3 INCHES.TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING, MULCHING & BLANKET.SEED·TEMPORARY SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 21-112 (WINTER WHEAT COVER CROP) FOR WINTER AND 21-111 (OATS COVER CROP)FOR SPRING/SUMMER APPLICATIONS. BOTH SEED MIXES SHALL BE APPLIED AT A SEEDING RATE OF 100 LBS/ACRE.MULCH·IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING, WITHIN 24 HOURS, MNDOT TYPE 1 MULCH SHOULD BE APPLIED TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE SEEDGERMINATION. MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT 90% COVERAGE (2 TONS PER ACRE OF STRAW MULCH)SLOPES·3:1 (HORIZ/VERT.) OR FLATTER MUCH SHALL BE COVERED WITH MULCH·SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR DITCH BOTTOMS SHALL BE COVERED WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET.·SEE PLAN FOR MORE DETAILED DITCH AND STEEP SLOPE EROSION CONTROL TREATMENTS.BHATTI EDINA PROPERTIES, LLC1447 WHITE OAK DRIVECHASKA, MN 55318CONTACT: DR. AHSAN BHATTI, SARA BHATTI Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cBHATTI GI MEDICAL 6500 BARRIE ROAD, EDINA, MN 55435 915 CASCADE DRIVE, CHASKA, MN 55318 TERRAIN HOLDINGS LLC. PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:21004. .. .. .. .. .. .08/20/21 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:MW,RB,PSJD, PS. .. .. .. .. .. .. .202124904Patrick J. SarverLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.08/20/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC5.1CIVIL DETAILS. .. .. .. .. .. . 4 - PD-121 - EK-2.51 - SH-2.51 - SH-2.51 - SH-2.51 - SH-2.51 - EK-3.53 - HA7 - TN2 - MS-1.510 - SGJ63 - CK13 - SGJ3 - HA2 - BF-101 - EK-3.53 - TN7 - SGJ2 - PN10 - NW215 - CK10 - NW22 - PN12 - SGJ9 - NW221 - NW25 - PN11 - NW23 - TN1 - EK-3.56 - TN1 - BL-4.51 - SH-4.52 - PG-3.51 - HA1 - PN40 - CK8 - HSN00°25'09"W 321.78N89°44'41"W 103.04S00°24'45"E 321.78 S89°44'41"E 103.08S89°44'41"E 103.08N Line of the S 268 Feetof Lot 5, Block 4, SOUTHDALE ACRESPID: 2902824200326500 Barrie RdBARRIE ROAD(A Public R/W)[10]Public Street Easementper Doc. No. 76894430.0030.00 12" VCP12" VCP9" VCP9" VCP San. Serv.Per FieldMarkings8" CIP2" WaterServ.Per Rec.4" WaterServ.Per Rec.REUSE EXISTING 2"DOMESTIC WATER SERVICEAND VALVE, STUB TOWITHIN 5' FROM BUILDING,COORD. W/MECH'LREUSE EXISTING 6"SANITARY SERVICE,STUB TO WITHIN 5' FROMBUILDING, COORD.W/MECH'LREUSE EXISTING 4" FIRESERVICE AND EXISTING PIVSTUB TO WITHIN 5' FROMBUILDING, COORD.W/MECH'LFL= 884.35 (12" ABOVE FG)FG=883.35TRENCH DRAINRIM=872.52CONNECT TO BUILDING STORMSERVICE, COORD. W/MECH'LTREESQTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAMECONTPG-3.52Princeton Sentry Gingko / Ginkgo biloba `Princeton Sentry`3.5" CAL. B&BSH-2.54Skyline Thornless Honey Locust / Gleditsia triacanthos inermis `Skycole` TM 2.5" Cal. B&BSH-4.51Skyline Thornless Honey Locust / Gleditsia triacanthos inermis `Skycole` TM 4.5" CAL. B&BEK-2.51Espresso Kentucky Coffeetree / Gymnocladus dioica `Espresso`2.5" Cal. B&BEK-3.53Espresso Kentucky Coffeetree / Gymnocladus dioica `Espresso`3.5" CAL. B&BBL-4.51Boulevard Linden / Tilia americana `Boulevard`4.5" CAL. B&BEVERGREEN TREES QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAMECONTBF-102Balsam Fir / Abies balsamea10` B&BPD-124Black Hills Spruce / Picea glauca `Densata`12` B&BORNAMENTAL TREES QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAMECONTMS-1.52Spring Snow Crabapple / Malus x `Spring Snow`1.5" Cal. B&BSHRUBSQTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAMESIZEHA7Annabelle Hydrangea / Hydrangea arborescens `Annabelle`#5 CONTSGJ72Sea Green Juniper / Juniperus chinensis `Sea Green`5 gal.PN10Bird`s Nest Spruce / Picea abies `Nidiformis`#5 CONTTN19Nova Japanese Yew / Taxus cuspidata `Nova`#5 CONTGRASSESQTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAMESIZECK118Feather Reed Grass / Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster`#1 CONTPERENNIALSQTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAMESIZEHS32Stella Supreme Daylily / Hemerocallis x `Stella Supreme`#1 CONTNW261Walkers Low Catmint / Nepeta x faassenii `Walkers Low`#1 CONTGROUND COVERS QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAMESIZE337 sf Rock Maintanence Strip / Rock Maintanence Strip1" River rock over filter fabric, include edging as shown & needed. Seedetail.Mulch9,795 sf Blue Grass Based / SodCommercial grade, locally grown, "Big Roll" preferredSodPLANT SCHEDULEREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONL1.0LANDSCAPE PLAN............Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cBHATTI GI MEDICAL 6500 BARRIE ROAD, EDINA, MN 55435 915 CASCADE DRIVE, CHASKA, MN 55318 TERRAIN HOLDINGS LLC. PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER: 21004............08/20/21 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:MW,RB,PSJD, PS..............2021LICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.25821Robert L. Binder08/20/21NKnow what'sRPROPOSED PERENNIAL PLANT SYMBOLS - SEE PLANTSCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN SHRUB SYMBOLS - SEEPLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANTSCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANTSCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED CANOPY TREE SYMBOLS - SEEPLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES ANDPLANTING SIZESEDGINGDECORATIVE BOULDERS (ROUNDED & BLOCK STYLE), 18"-30" DIA.POLLINATOR SAFE PLANT MATERIAL:LANDSCAPE NOTES:IRRIGATION NOTES:AGGREGATE MAINTANENCE STRIPN T S1PERENNIAL BED PLANTINGN T S4DECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS SHRUB PLANTINGN T S3DECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTINGN T S2 INLET PROTECTION ATCATCH BASINS, TYPINLET PROTECTION ATCATCH BASINS, TYPPERIMETEREROSION CONTROLAT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSION CONTROLAT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCECONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEINLET PROTECTION AT ALLDOWNSTREAM CATCHBASINS.48.280.0 80.0 48.0Two Story Brick & Stucco BuildingFoundation Area=3,846 Sq. Ft. +/-Building AboveBuilding Above11202511711MulchMulchMulchLandscape RockMulchMulch PylonSign47.7 48.147.6 47.4 47.5 48.2N00°25'09"W 321.78N89°44'41"W 103.04S00°24'45"E 321.78 S89°44'41"E 103.08S89°44'41"E 103.08N Line of the S 268 Feetof Lot 5, Block 4, SOUTHDALE ACRESPID: 2902824200326500 Barrie RdBARRIE ROAD (A Public R/W)65TH STREET WEST(A Public R/W)[10]Public Street Easementper Doc. No. 768944291.78 291.78 30.00 30.00 12" VCP12" VCP9" VCP9" VCP San. Serv.Per FieldMarkings8" CIP2" WaterServ.Per Rec.4" WaterServ.Per Rec.Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cBHATTI GI MEDICAL 6500 BARRIE ROAD, EDINA, MN 55435 915 CASCADE DRIVE, CHASKA, MN 55318 TERRAIN HOLDINGS LLC. PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER: 21004............08/20/21 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:MW,RB,PSJD, PS..............202124904Patrick J. SarverLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.08/20/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.0SWPPP - EXISTINGCONDITIONS............NCITY OF EDINA EROSION CONTROL NOTES:2. THIS PROJECT IS LESS THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL NOTREQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY EROSION CONTROLPERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.3. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.3 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROLNOTES, DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES.\4. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSIONCONTROL NOTES.5. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPPIMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITHNPDES PERMIT.SWPPP NOTES:Know what'sRLEGEND:ALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, ANDMEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUMREQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURINGTHE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. INLET PROTECTION ATCATCH BASINS, TYPINLET PROTECTION ATCATCH BASINS, TYPPERIMETEREROSION CONTROLAT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSION CONTROLAT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCEINLET PROTECTION ATTRENCH DRAINCONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEINLET PROTECTION AT ALLDOWNSTREAM CATCHBASINS.N00°25'09"W 321.78N89°44'41"W 103.04S00°24'45"E 321.78 S89°44'41"E 103.08S89°44'41"E 103.08N Line of the S 268 Feetof Lot 5, Block 4, SOUTHDALE ACRESPID: 2902824200326500 Barrie RdBARRIE ROAD (A Public R/W)65TH STREET WEST(A Public R/W)[10]Public Street Easementper Doc. No. 76894430.00 30.00 12" VCP12" VCP9" VCP9" VCP San. Serv.Per FieldMarkings8" CIP2" WaterServ.Per Rec.4" WaterServ.Per Rec.Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cBHATTI GI MEDICAL 6500 BARRIE ROAD, EDINA, MN 55435 915 CASCADE DRIVE, CHASKA, MN 55318 TERRAIN HOLDINGS LLC. PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER: 21004............08/20/21 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:MW,RB,PSJD, PS..............202124904Patrick J. SarverLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.08/20/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.1SWPPP - PROPOSEDCONDITIONS............NKnow what'sRCITY OF EDINA EROSION CONTROL NOTES:2. THIS PROJECT IS LESS THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL NOTREQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY EROSION CONTROLPERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.3. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.3 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROLNOTES, DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES.4. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSIONCONTROL NOTES.5. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION,INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT.SWPPP NOTES:LEGEND:ALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, ANDMEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUMREQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURINGTHE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cBHATTI GI MEDICAL 6500 BARRIE ROAD, EDINA, MN 55435 915 CASCADE DRIVE, CHASKA, MN 55318 TERRAIN HOLDINGS LLC. PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:21004. .. .. .. .. .. .08/20/21 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:MW,RB,PSJD, PS. .. .. .. .. .. .. .202124904Patrick J. SarverLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.08/20/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.2SWPPP - DETAILS. .. .. .. .. .. .OVERFLOW AT TOP OFFILTER ASSEMBLYOVERFLOW IS 12 OF THE CURBBOX HEIGHTHIGH-FLOW FABRICFILTER ASSEMBLY DIAMETER, 6"ON-GRADE 10" AT LOW POINTEXISTING CURB, PLATE, BOX,AND GRATENOTES:1. REPLACE INLET GRATE UPON COMPLETE INSTALLATION OF INLET PROTECTION FABRIC.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS FROM THE SURFACE OF THE SYSTEMAFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND AT THE COMPLETION OF THE CONTRACT.3. REFERENCE APPLE VALLEY STANDARD PLATE ERO-4C.CURB INLET FILTERN T S1PROFILE6" MIN CRUSHED STONE75' MINIMUMPLANFINISHEDGRADETO CONSTRUCTION AREA35' REXISTINGUNDISTURBEDROADWAYN T S30' FROM EDGE OF ROADTO FRONT OF SPEED BUMPGEOTEXTILE FILTERFABRIC4" HIGH, 18" WIDESPEED BUMPSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ACCESS24' (MIN)NOTES:1.PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND UNDISTURBEDROADWAY.2.THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENTONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE OR ADDINGSTONE TO THE LENGTH OF THE ENTRANCE.3.REPAIR AND CLEANOUT MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT.4.ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY SHALL BE REMOVED ASDIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.5.FINAL LOCATION AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.6.CRUSHED STONE SHALL BE 1-1/2" DIA. CLOSE GRADED, AND IN ACCORDANCE TO MNDOT SECTION 2118.EXISTING UNDISTURBED ROADWAY35' RTO CONSTRUCTIONAREA2TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL.SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES,10" SPACING, 4" DOWN FROMTRENCHOVERLAP: BURY UPPER ENDOF LOWER STRIP AS IN 'A'AND 'B'. OVERLAP END OFTOP STRIP 4" AND STAPLE.EROSION STOP: FOLD OF MATTINGBURIED IN SILT TRENCH ANDTAMPED. DOUBLEROW OFSTAPLES.PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APARTTO KEEP MATTING FIRMLYPRESSED TO SOIL.'D''C''B'BURY THE TOP END OF THEMATTING IN A TRENCH 4" ORMORE IN DEPTHTYPICAL STAPLE #8GAUGE WIRE1 1/2"10"OVERFALL'E''A'NOTE:1. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TOKEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TOSOIL.EROSION BLANKETN T S3FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIEDEXISTING GROUNDSURFACEDIRECTION OF FLOWWOODEN STAKES 1/2"X2"X16" MIN. PLACED 10' O.C.WHEN INSTALLED ON GROUND. IF INSTALLED ONPVMT. PROVIDE SANDBAGS BEHIND AND ON TOP ATMIN. 10' O.C.8" MIN.SEDIMENT BIO-ROLL / COMPOST FILTER LOGN T SFILLER AS SPECIFIEDNOTE:1. COMPOST FILTER LOGS (BIO ROLLS) SHALL BE FILTREXX EROSION CONTROL SOXX OR APPROVED EQUAL.2. COMPOST FILLER TO BE MADE FROM A COMPOST BLEND 30%-40% GRADE 2 (SPEC 3890) AND 60%-70%PARTIALLY DECOMPOSED WOOD CHIPS, PER MNDOT SPEC 3897.3. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE GEOTEXTILE KNITTED MATERIAL WITH MAX. OPENINGS OF 3/8".4. IF MULTIPLE ROLLS NEEDED, OVERLAP BY MIN. 12" AT ENDS AND STAKE.5. SILT SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE IT REACHES 80% OF THE HEIGHT OF THE ROLL OR AS DEEMED NECESSARYBY SITE CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN PROPER FUNCTION.FILL UPSTREAM BASE EDGE WITH2" OF DIRT OR COMPOST TOEMBED ROLL.4FILTER FABRIC WITH WIRE SUPPORT NETAS SPECIFIED.METAL POST ASSPECIFIED.FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED SECURETO WIRE SUPPORT NET WITH METALCLIPS 12"O.C.SUPPORT NET: 12 GAUGE 4" x 4"WIRE HOOKED ONTOPREFORMED CHANNELS ONPOSTS AS SPECIFIED.EXISTING GROUNDSURFACECARRY WIRE SUPPORT NETDOWN INTO TRENCHDIRECTION OF FLOWANCHOR FABRIC WITHSOIL, TAMP BACKFILLMETAL POSTS 8'-0" O.C.MAX.24" 24" 24"MIN. 6"6"SEDIMENT FENCEN T S5 Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cBHATTI GI MEDICAL 6500 BARRIE ROAD, EDINA, MN 55435 915 CASCADE DRIVE, CHASKA, MN 55318 TERRAIN HOLDINGS LLC. PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:21004. .. .. .. .. .. .08/20/21 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:MW,RB,PSJD, PS. .. .. .. .. .. .. .202124904Patrick J. SarverLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.08/20/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.3SWPPP - NARRATIVE. .. .. .. .. .. .OWNER INFORMATIONTRAINING SECTION 21PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PERMANENTSTORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMPERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IS NOT REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT TO MEET NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. THEPROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPOSED STORMWATER SYSTEM.AREAS AND QUANTITIES:SWPPP CONTACT PERSONCONTRACTOR:SWPPP INSPECTOR TRAINING:ALL SWPPP INSPECTIONS MUST BE PERFORMED BY APERSON THAT MEETS THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THENPDES CONSTRUCTION SITE PERMIT.TRAINING CREDENTIALS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THECONTRACTOR AND KEPT ON SITE WITH THE SWPPPNOTE: QUANTITIES ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE FOR THEMSELVES THE EXACTQUANTITIES FOR BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION.PROJECT NARRATIVE:PROJECT IS A REDEVELOPMENT OF AN EXISTING BUILDING INTO A NEW MEDICAL BUILDING. SITE AND LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WILL OCCUR.NATIVE BUFFER NARRATIVE:PRESERVING A 50' NATURAL BUFFER AROUND WATER BODIES IS NOT REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT BECAUSE WATER BODIES ARE NOTLOCATED ON SITE.INFILTRATION NARRATIVE:INFILTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED AS PART OF THE PROJECT BECAUSE PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT IS NOT REQUIRED.SOIL CONTAMINATION NARRATIVE:SOILS ONSITE HAVE NOT BEEN IDENTIFIED AS CONTAMINATED. AN MPCA SOILS ASSESSMENT WAS COMPLETED AND IT WAS DETERMINED THATTHIS SITE IS APPROPRIATE FOR INFILTRATION.SPECIAL TMDL BMP REQUIREMENTS SITE SPECIFIC (IF REQUIRED):THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN ONE MILE AND DISCHARGES TO BOTH MEDICINE LAKE AND NORTHWOOD LAKE - MEDICINE LAKE AND NORTHWOOD LAKEARE IDENTIFIED AS IMPAIRED WATER BODIES PER THE MPCA'S 303(D) IMPAIRED WATERS LIST. MEDICINE LAKE AND NORTHWOOD LAKE AREIMPAIRED FOR NUTRIENT EUTROPHICATION BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS. BECAUSE THESE WATERS ARE LOCATED WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE SITE,BMPS AS DEFINED IN THE NPDES PERMIT ITEMS 23.9 AND 23.10 APPLY. THESE ARE AS FOLLOWS:1.DURING CONSTRUCTION:A.STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION BUT IN NO CASE COMPLETEDLATER THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLYCEASED.B.TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 14. MUST BE USED FOR COMMON DRAINAGE LOCATIONS THATSERVE AN AREA WITH FIVE (5) OR MORE ACRES DISTURBED AT ONE TIME.PERMANENT STABILIZATION NOTES SITE SPECIFIC:PERMANENT SEED MIX·FOR THIS PROJECT ALL AREAS THAT ARE NOT TO BE SODDED OR LANDSCAPED SHALL RECEIVE A NATIVE PERMANENT SEED MIX.··AREAS IN BUFFERS AND ADJACENT TO OR IN WET AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 (STORMWATER SOUTH AND WEST) AT 35 LBS PERACRE.··DRY AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 35-221 (DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL) AT 40 LBS PER ACRE.·MAINTENANCE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL.SUPPLEMENTARY SITE SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES:THESE NOTES SUPERCEDE ANY GENERAL SWPPP NOTES.THIS PROJECT IS LESS THAN 1.0 ACRES SO AN NPDES PERMIT IS NOT REQUIRED AND DOEDS NOT NEED TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA.THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES IN THE NPDES PERMIT THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION.SWPPP ATTACHMENTS (ONLY APPLICABLE IF SITE IS 1 ACRE OR GREATER):CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE FOLLOWING SWPPP ATTACHMENTS WHICH ARE A PART OF THE OVERALL SWPPP PACKAGE:ATTACHMENT A. CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE - SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENTATTACHMENT B. CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLISTATTACHMENT C. MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMSATTACHMENT D: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.ATTACHMENT E: GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.DESIGN ENGINEER: MATTHEW R. PAVEK P.E.TRAINING COURSE: DESIGN OF SWPPPTRAINING ENTITY: UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAINSTRUCTOR: JOHN CHAPMANDATES OF TRAINING COURSE: 5/15/2011 - 5/16/2011TOTAL TRAINING HOURS: 12RE-CERTIFICATION: 2/27/2020 (8 HOURS), EXP. 5/31/2023THE CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH A CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT DISTURBS SITE SOIL OR WHOIMPLEMENT A POLLUTANT CONTROL MEASURE IDENTIFIED IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) MUSTCOMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT (DATEDAUGUST 1, 2018 # MNR100001) AND ANY LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION CONCERNING EROSION AND SEDIMENTATIONCONTROL.STORMWATER DISCHARGE DESIGN REQUIREMENTSSWPPPTHE NATURE OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IS REPRESENTED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS. SEE THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS AND SWPPP NARRATIVE (ATTACHMENT A: CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE) FORADDITIONAL SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP INFORMATION. THE PLANS SHOW LOCATIONS AND TYPES OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENTEROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S. STANDARD DETAILS ARE ATTACHED TO THIS SWPPP DOCUMENT.THE INTENDED SEQUENCING OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IS AS FOLLOWS:1. INSTALL STABILIZED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE2. INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE AROUND SITE3. INSTALL ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING AROUND INFILTRATION AREAS4. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT ALL ADJACENT AND DOWNSTREAM CATCH BASINS5. CLEAR AND GRUB FOR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND INSTALL6. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND (SECTION 14)7. CLEAR AND GRUB REMAINDER OF SITE8. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL9. ROUGH GRADING OF SITE10. STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS AND STOCKPILES11. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN STORM SEWER AND SERVICES12. INSTALL SILT FENCE / INLET PROTECTION AROUND CB'S13. INSTALL STREET SECTION14. INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER15. BITUMINOUS ON STREETS16. FINAL GRADE BOULEVARD, INSTALL SEED AND MULCH17. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM BASIN / POND18. FINAL GRADE POND / INFILTRATION BASINS (DO NOT COMPACT SOILS IN INFILTRATION AREAS.)19. WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED BY EITHER SEED OR SOD/LANDSCAPING, REMOVESILT FENCE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL.RECORDS RETENTION:THE SWPPP (ORIGINAL OR COPIES) INCLUDING, ALL CHANGES TO IT, AND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE KEPT ATTHE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION BY THE PERMITTEE WHO HAS OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THAT PORTION OF THE SITE. THE SWPPPCAN BE KEPT IN EITHER THE FIELD OFFICE OR IN AN ON SITE VEHICLE DURING NORMAL WORKING HOURS.ALL OWNER(S) MUST KEEP THE SWPPP, ALONG WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL RECORDS, ON FILE FOR THREE (3) YEARS AFTERSUBMITTAL OF THE NOT AS OUTLINED IN SECTION 4. THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY RECORDS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT.1.THE FINAL SWPPP;2.ANY OTHER STORMWATER RELATED PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT;3.RECORDS OF ALL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION (SEE SECTION 11, INSPECTIONS ANDMAINTENANCE);4.ALL PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED, INCLUDING ALL RIGHT OF WAY,CONTRACTS, COVENANTS AND OTHER BINDING REQUIREMENTS REGARDING PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE; AND5.ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGN OF THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS.SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBILITIES:1.THE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ARE PERMITTEE(S) AS IDENTIFIED BY THE NPDES PERMIT.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ON-SITE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE ACTIVITIES OF ALL OFTHE CONTRACTOR'S SUBCONTRACTORS.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A PERSON(S) KNOWLEDGEABLE AND EXPERIENCED IN THE APPLICATION OF EROSION PREVENTIONAND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO OVERSEE ALL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF BMPS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THESWPPP.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PERSON(S) MEETING THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT TO CONDUCTINSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEREQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT. ONE OF THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR AN ONSITE INSPECTION WITHIN 72 HOURSUPON REQUEST BY MPCA. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TRAINING DOCUMENTATION FOR THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) AS REQUIRED BYTHE NPDES PERMIT. THIS TRAINING DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE RECORDED IN OR WITH THE SWPPP BEFORE THE START OFCONSTRUCTION OR AS SOON AS THE PERSONNEL FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN DETERMINED. DOCUMENTATION SHALL INCLUDE:4.1.NAMES OF THE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE TRAINED PER SECTION 21 OFTHE PERMIT.4.2.DATES OF TRAINING AND NAME OF INSTRUCTOR AND ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING.4.3.CONTENT OF TRAINING COURSE OR WORKSHOP INCLUDING THE NUMBER OF HOURS OF TRAINING.5.FOLLOWING FINAL STABILIZATION AND THE TERMINATION OF COVERAGE FOR THE NPDES PERMIT, THE OWNER IS EXPECTED TOFURNISH LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (O & M) OF THE PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTSSWPPP AMENDMENTS (SECTION 6):1.ONE OF THE INDIVIDUALS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 21.2.A OR ITEM 21.2.B OR ANOTHER QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL MUST COMPLETE ALLSWPPP CHANGES. CHANGES INVOLVING THE USE OF A LESS STRINGENT BMP MUST INCLUDE A JUSTIFICATION DESCRIBING HOWTHE REPLACEMENT BMP IS EFFECTIVE FOR THE SITE CHARACTERISTICS.2.PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TO CORRECT PROBLEMSIDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE,WEATHER OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS HAVING A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERSOR GROUNDWATER.3.PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TO CORRECT PROBLEMSIDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER INSPECTIONS OR INVESTIGATIONS BY THE SITE OWNER OR OPERATOR, USEPAOR MPCA OFFICIALS INDICATE THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE IN ELIMINATING OR SIGNIFICANTLY MINIMIZING THE DISCHARGE OFPOLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER OR THE DISCHARGES ARE CAUSING WATER QUALITY STANDARDEXCEEDANCES (E.G., NUISANCE CONDITIONS AS DEFINED IN MINN. R. 7050.0210, SUBP. 2) OR THE SWPPP IS NOT CONSISTENT WITHTHE OBJECTIVES OF A USEPA APPROVED TMDL.BMP SELECTION AND INSTALLATION (SECTION 7):1.PERMITTEES MUST SELECT, INSTALL, AND MAINTAIN THE BMPS IDENTIFIED IN THE SWPPP AND IN THIS PERMIT IN AN APPROPRIATEAND FUNCTIONAL MANNER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH RELEVANT MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AND ACCEPTED ENGINEERINGPRACTICES.EROSION PREVENTION (SECTION 8):1.BEFORE WORK BEGINS, PERMITTEES MUST DELINEATE THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED.2.PERMITTEES MUST MINIMIZE THE NEED FOR DISTURBANCE OF PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT WITH STEEP SLOPES. WHEN STEEPSLOPES MUST BE DISTURBED, PERMITTEES MUST USE TECHNIQUES SUCH AS PHASING AND STABILIZATION PRACTICES DESIGNEDFOR STEEP SLOPES (E.G., SLOPE DRAINING AND TERRACING).3.PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS, INCLUDING STOCKPILES. STABILIZATION MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELYTO LIMIT SOIL EROSION WHEN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY OR TEMPORARILY CEASED ON ANY PORTION OF THESITE AND WILL NOT RESUME FOR A PERIOD EXCEEDING 14 CALENDAR DAYS. STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ON CONSTRUCTED BASECOMPONENTS OF ROADS, PARKING LOTS AND SIMILAR SURFACES. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ON TEMPORARY STOCKPILESWITHOUT SIGNIFICANT SILT, CLAY OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS (E.G., CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCKPILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETESTOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES) BUT PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT THE BASE OF THE STOCKPILE.4.FOR PUBLIC WATERS THAT THE MINNESOTA DNR HAS PROMULGATED "WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS" DURING SPECIFIED FISHSPAWNING TIME FRAMES, PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THEWATER'S EDGE, AND THAT DRAIN TO THESE WATERS, WITHIN 24 HOURS DURING THE RESTRICTION PERIOD.5.PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF THE LAST 200 LINEAR FEET OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENTDRAINAGE DITCHES OR SWALES THAT DRAIN WATER FROM THE SITE WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATEROR PROPERTY EDGE. PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF REMAINING PORTIONS OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENTDITCHES OR SWALES WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER OR PROPERTY EDGE ANDCONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASES.6.TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM DURING CONSTRUCTION(WITH PROPERLY DESIGNED ROCK-DITCH CHECKS, BIO ROLLS, SILT DIKES, ETC.) DO NOT NEED TO BE STABILIZED. PERMITTEESMUST STABILIZE THESE AREAS WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER THEIR USE AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM CEASES7.PERMITTEES MUST NOT USE MULCH, HYDROMULCH, TACKIFIER, POLYACRYLAMIDE OR SIMILAR EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICESWITHIN ANY PORTION OF THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALESECTION WITH A CONTINUOUS SLOPE OF GREATER THAN 2 PERCENT.8.PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION AT ALL PIPE OUTLETS WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTERCONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER OR PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM.9.PERMITTEES MUST NOT DISTURB MORE LAND (I.E., PHASING) THAN CAN BE EFFECTIVELY INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED INACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 11.SEDIMENT CONTROL (SECTION 9):1.PERMITTEES MUST ESTABLISH SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS ON ALL DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETERS OF THE SITE AND DOWNGRADIENTAREAS OF THE SITE THAT DRAIN TO ANY SURFACE WATER, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS. PERMITTEES MUST LOCATESEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES UPGRADIENT OF ANY BUFFER ZONES. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROLPRACTICES BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENT LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN AND MUST KEEP THE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICESIN PLACE UNTIL THEY ESTABLISH PERMANENT COVER.2.IF DOWNGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE OVERLOADED, BASED ON FREQUENT FAILURE OR EXCESSIVE MAINTENANCEREQUIREMENTS, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL ADDITIONAL UPGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES OR REDUNDANT BMPS TOELIMINATE THE OVERLOADING AND AMEND THE SWPPP TO IDENTIFY THESE ADDITIONAL PRACTICES AS REQUIRED IN ITEM 6.3.3.TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES AND SEDIMENT BASINS DESIGNED AS PART OF A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENTSYSTEM (E.G., DITCHES WITH ROCK-CHECK DAMS) REQUIRE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ONLY AS APPROPRIATE FOR SITECONDITIONS.4.A FLOATING SILT CURTAIN PLACED IN THE WATER IS NOT A SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP TO SATISFY ITEM 9.2 EXCEPT WHEN WORKINGON A SHORELINE OR BELOW THE WATERLINE. IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SHORT TERM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (E.G.,INSTALLATION OF RIP RAP ALONG THE SHORELINE) IN THAT AREA IS COMPLETE, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL AN UPLANDPERIMETER CONTROL PRACTICE IF EXPOSED SOILS STILL DRAIN TO A SURFACE WATER.5.PERMITTEES MUST RE-INSTALL ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ADJUSTED OR REMOVED TO ACCOMMODATE SHORT-TERMACTIVITIES SUCH AS CLEARING OR GRUBBING, OR PASSAGE OF VEHICLES, IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY ISCOMPLETED. PERMITTEES MUST RE-INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES BEFORE THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT EVEN IFTHE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE.6.PERMITTEES MUST PROTECT ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS USING APPROPRIATE BMPS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL THEYESTABLISH PERMANENT COVER ON ALL AREAS WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET.7.PERMITTEES MAY REMOVE INLET PROTECTION FOR A PARTICULAR INLET IF A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN (E.G. STREETFLOODING/FREEZING) IS IDENTIFIED BY THE PERMITTEES OR THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY (E.G.,CITY/COUNTY/TOWNSHIP/MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER). PERMITTEES MUST DOCUMENT THE NEEDFOR REMOVAL IN THE SWPPP.8.PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT THE BASE OF STOCKPILES ON THEDOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER.9.PERMITTEES MUST LOCATE STOCKPILES OUTSIDE OF NATURAL BUFFERS OR SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORMWATERCONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS UNLESS THERE IS A BYPASS IN PLACE FOR THE STORMWATER. 10. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL A VEHICLE TRACKING BMP TO MINIMIZE THE TRACK OUT OF SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITEOR ONTO PAVED ROADS WITHIN THE SITE. 11. PERMITTEES MUST USE STREET SWEEPING IF VEHICLE TRACKING BMPS ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT TRACKINGONTO THE STREET. 12. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 14. 13. IN ANY AREAS OF THE SITE WHERE FINAL VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION WILL OCCUR, PERMITTEES MUST RESTRICT VEHICLE ANDEQUIPMENT USE TO MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION. 14. PERMITTEES MUST PRESERVE TOPSOIL ON THE SITE, UNLESS INFEASIBLE. 15. PERMITTEES MUST DIRECT DISCHARGES FROM BMPS TO VEGETATED AREAS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. 16. PERMITTEES MUST PRESERVE A 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER OR, IF A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE ON THE SITE, PROVIDE REDUNDANT(DOUBLE) PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS WHEN A SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED WITHIN 50 FEET OF THE PROJECT'S EARTHDISTURBANCES AND STORMWATER FLOWS TO THE SURFACE WATER. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL PERIMETER SEDIMENTCONTROLS AT LEAST 5 FEET APART UNLESS LIMITED BY LACK OF AVAILABLE SPACE. NATURAL BUFFERS ARE NOT REQUIREDADJACENT TO ROAD DITCHES, JUDICIAL DITCHES, COUNTY DITCHES, STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS, STORM DRAININLETS, AND SEDIMENT BASINS. IF PRESERVING THE BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE, PERMITTEES MUST DOCUMENT THE REASONS IN THESWPPP. SHEET PILING IS A REDUNDANT PERIMETER CONTROL IF INSTALLED IN A MANNER THAT RETAINS ALL STORMWATER. 17. PERMITTEES MUST USE POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS, OR OTHER SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS IN ACCORDANCE WITHACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES, DOSING SPECIFICATIONS AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED BYTHE MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER. THE PERMITTEES MUST USE CONVENTIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS PRIOR TOCHEMICAL ADDITION AND MUST DIRECT TREATED STORMWATER TO A SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM FOR FILTRATION ORSETTLEMENT OF THE FLOC PRIOR TO DISCHARGE.DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING (SECTION 10):1.PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE TURBID OR SEDIMENT-LADEN WATERS RELATED TO DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING (E.G.,PUMPED DISCHARGES, TRENCH/DITCH CUTS FOR DRAINAGE) TO A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENT BASIN ON THE PROJECTSITE UNLESS INFEASIBLE. PERMITTEES MAY DEWATER TO SURFACE WATERS IF THEY VISUALLY CHECK TO ENSURE ADEQUATETREATMENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED AND NUISANCE CONDITIONS (SEE MINN. R. 7050.0210, SUBP. 2) WILL NOT RESULT FROM THEDISCHARGE. IF PERMITTEES CANNOT DISCHARGE THE WATER TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING A SURFACEWATER, PERMITTEES MUST TREAT IT WITH APPROPRIATE BMPS SUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THESURFACE WATER OR DOWNSTREAM PROPERTIES.2.IF PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE WATER CONTAINING OIL OR GREASE, THEY MUST USE AN OIL-WATER SEPARATOR OR SUITABLEFILTRATION DEVICE (E.G., CARTRIDGE FILTERS, ABSORBENTS PADS) PRIOR TO DISCHARGE.3.PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE ALL WATER FROM DEWATERING OR BASIN-DRAINING ACTIVITIES IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOTCAUSE EROSION OR SCOUR IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS OR INUNDATION OF WETLANDS IN THE IMMEDIATEVICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS THAT CAUSES SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT TO THE WETLAND.4.IF PERMITTEES USE FILTERS WITH BACKWASH WATER, THEY MUST HAUL THE BACKWASH WATER AWAY FOR DISPOSAL, RETURNTHE BACKWASH WATER TO THE BEGINNING OF THE TREATMENT PROCESS, OR INCORPORATE THE BACKWASH WATER INTO THESITE IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION.INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE (SECTION 11):1.PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE A TRAINED PERSON, AS IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 21.2.B, WILL INSPECT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION SITE ATLEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATERTHAN 1/2 INCH IN 24 HOURS.2.PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT AND MAINTAIN ALL PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT BMPS.3.PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS AND POLLUTION PREVENTIONMANAGEMENT MEASURES TO ENSURE INTEGRITY AND EFFECTIVENESS. PERMITTEES MUST REPAIR, REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENTALL NONFUNCTIONAL BMPS WITH FUNCTIONAL BMPS BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY AFTER DISCOVERY UNLESSANOTHER TIME FRAME IS SPECIFIED IN ITEM 11.5 OR 11.6. PERMITTEES MAY TAKE ADDITIONAL TIME IF FIELD CONDITIONS PREVENTACCESS TO THE AREA.4.DURING EACH INSPECTION, PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE DITCHES AND CONVEYANCESYSTEMS BUT NOT CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, FOR EVIDENCE OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITION. PERMITTEES MUSTREMOVE ALL DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE WAYS, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHERDRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND RESTABILIZE THE AREAS WHERE SEDIMENT REMOVAL RESULTS IN EXPOSED SOIL. PERMITTEES MUSTCOMPLETE REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF DISCOVERY UNLESS PRECLUDED BY LEGAL,REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. PERMITTEES MUST USE ALL REASONABLE EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ACCESS. IFPRECLUDED, REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MUST TAKE PLACE WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF OBTAINING ACCESS. PERMITTEES ARERESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AUTHORITIES AND RECEIVING ANY APPLICABLEPERMITS, PRIOR TO CONDUCTING ANY WORK IN SURFACE WATERS.5.PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT CONSTRUCTION SITE VEHICLE EXIT LOCATIONS, STREETS AND CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS WITHINAND ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT FOR SEDIMENTATION FROM EROSION OR TRACKED SEDIMENT FROM VEHICLES. PERMITTEESMUST REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM ALL PAVED SURFACES WITHIN ONE (1) CALENDAR DAY OF DISCOVERY OR, IF APPLICABLE, WITHINA SHORTER TIME TO AVOID A SAFETY HAZARD TO USERS OF PUBLIC STREETS.6.PERMITTEES MUST REPAIR, REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENT ALL PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUNCTIONALOR THE SEDIMENT REACHES 1/2 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE.7.PERMITTEES MUST DRAIN TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS AND REMOVE THE SEDIMENT WHEN THE DEPTHOF SEDIMENT COLLECTED IN THE BASIN REACHES 1/2 THE STORAGE VOLUME.8.PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE THAT AT LEAST ONE INDIVIDUAL PRESENT ON THE SITE (OR AVAILABLE TO THE PROJECT SITE INTHREE (3) CALENDAR DAYS) IS TRAINED IN THE JOB DUTIES DESCRIBED IN ITEM 21.2.B.9.PERMITTEES MAY ADJUST THE INSPECTION SCHEDULE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 11.2 AS FOLLOWS:a. INSPECTIONS OF AREAS WITH PERMANENT COVER CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH, EVEN IF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITYCONTINUES ON OTHER PORTIONS OF THE SITE; ORb.WHERE SITES HAVE PERMANENT COVER ON ALL EXPOSED SOIL AND NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS OCCURRING ANYWHEREON THE SITE, INSPECTIONS CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH AND, AFTER 12 MONTHS, MAY BE SUSPENDEDCOMPLETELY UNTIL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY RESUMES. THE MPCA MAY REQUIRE INSPECTIONS TO RESUME IF CONDITIONSWARRANT; ORc.WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS BEEN SUSPENDED DUE TO FROZEN GROUND CONDITIONS, INSPECTIONS MAY BESUSPENDED. INSPECTIONS MUST RESUME WITHIN 24 HOURS OF RUNOFF OCCURRING, OR UPON RESUMING CONSTRUCTION,WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. 10. PERMITTEES MUST RECORD ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BEING CONDUCTED ANDTHESE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED WITH THE SWPPP. THESE RECORDS MUST INCLUDE:a.DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTIONS; ANDb.NAME OF PERSONS CONDUCTING INSPECTIONS; ANDc.ACCURATE FINDINGS OF INSPECTIONS, INCLUDING THE SPECIFIC LOCATION WHERE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE NEEDED; ANDd.CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN (INCLUDING DATES, TIMES, AND PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES); ANDe.DATE OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 1/2 INCHES IN 24 HOURS, AND THE AMOUNT OF RAINFALL FOR EACH EVENT.PERMITTEES MUST OBTAIN RAINFALL AMOUNTS BY EITHER A PROPERLY MAINTAINED RAIN GAUGE INSTALLED ONSITE, AWEATHER STATION THAT IS WITHIN ONE (1) MILE OF YOUR LOCATION, OR A WEATHER REPORTING SYSTEM THAT PROVIDESSITE SPECIFIC RAINFALL DATA FROM RADAR SUMMARIES; ANDf.IF PERMITTEES OBSERVE A DISCHARGE DURING THE INSPECTION, THEY MUST RECORD AND SHOULD PHOTOGRAPH ANDDESCRIBE THE LOCATION OF THE DISCHARGE (I.E., COLOR, ODOR, SETTLED OR SUSPENDED SOLIDS, OIL SHEEN, AND OTHEROBVIOUS INDICATORS OF POLLUTANTS); ANDg.ANY AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP PROPOSED AS A RESULT OF THE INSPECTION MUST BE DOCUMENTED AS REQUIRED INSECTION 6 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS.POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT (SECTION 12):1.PERMITTEES MUST PLACE BUILDING PRODUCTS AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTIC SHEETING ORTEMPORARY ROOFS) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER.PERMITTEES ARE NOT REQUIRED TO COVER OR PROTECT PRODUCTS WHICH ARE EITHER NOT A SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION TOSTORMWATER OR ARE DESIGNED TO BE EXPOSED TO STORMWATER.2.PERMITTEES MUST PLACE PESTICIDES, FERTILIZERS AND TREATMENT CHEMICALS UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTIC SHEETING ORTEMPORARY ROOFS) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER.3.PERMITTEES MUST STORE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TOXIC WASTE, (INCLUDING OIL, DIESEL FUEL, GASOLINE, HYDRAULICFLUIDS, PAINT SOLVENTS, PETROLEUM-BASED PRODUCTS, WOOD PRESERVATIVES, ADDITIVES, CURING COMPOUNDS, AND ACIDS)IN SEALED CONTAINERS TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTEMATERIALS MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7045 INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AS APPLICABLE.4.PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY STORE, COLLECT AND DISPOSE SOLID WASTE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7035.5.PERMITTEES MUST POSITION PORTABLE TOILETS SO THEY ARE SECURE AND WILL NOT TIP OR BE KNOCKED OVER. PERMITTEESMUST PROPERLY DISPOSE SANITARY WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7041.6.PERMITTEES MUST TAKE REASONABLE STEPS TO PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF SPILLED OR LEAKED CHEMICALS, INCLUDING FUEL,FROM ANY AREA WHERE CHEMICALS OR FUEL WILL BE LOADED OR UNLOADED INCLUDING THE USE OF DRIP PANS ORABSORBENTS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE ADEQUATE SUPPLIES ARE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES TO CLEAN UPDISCHARGED MATERIALS AND THAT AN APPROPRIATE DISPOSAL METHOD IS AVAILABLE FOR RECOVERED SPILLED MATERIALS.PERMITTEES MUST REPORT AND CLEAN UP SPILLS IMMEDIATELY AS REQUIRED BY MINN. STAT. 115.061, USING DRY CLEAN UPMEASURES WHERE POSSIBLE.7.PERMITTEES MUST LIMIT VEHICLE EXTERIOR WASHING AND EQUIPMENT TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. PERMITTEES MUSTCONTAIN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHING AREA IN A SEDIMENT BASIN OR OTHER SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE CONTROLS AND MUSTDISPOSE WASTE FROM THE WASHING ACTIVITY PROPERLY. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY USE AND STORE SOAPS, DETERGENTS,OR SOLVENTS.8.PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONTAINMENT FOR ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BY WASHOUTOPERATIONS (E.G., CONCRETE, STUCCO, PAINT, FORM RELEASE OILS, CURING COMPOUNDS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTIONMATERIALS) RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. PERMITTEES MUST PREVENT LIQUID AND SOLID WASHOUT WASTES FROMCONTACTING THE GROUND AND MUST DESIGN THE CONTAINMENT SO IT DOES NOT RESULT IN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHOUTOPERATIONS OR AREAS. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY DISPOSE LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA RULES.PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL A SIGN INDICATING THE LOCATION OF THE WASHOUT FACILITY.PERMIT TERMINATION (SECTION 4 AND SECTION 13):1.PERMITTEES MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER ALL TERMINATION CONDITIONS LISTED IN SECTION 13 ARE COMPLETE.2.PERMITTEES MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER SELLING OR OTHERWISE LEGALLY TRANSFERRING THE ENTIRE SITE,INCLUDING PERMIT RESPONSIBILITY FOR ROADS (E.G., STREET SWEEPING) AND STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE FINAL CLEANOUT, OR TRANSFERRING PORTIONS OF A SITE TO ANOTHER PARTY. THE PERMITTEES' COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMITTERMINATES AT MIDNIGHT ON THE SUBMISSION DATE OF THE NOT.3.PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND MUST INSTALL PERMANENT COVER OVER ALL AREAS PRIOR TOSUBMITTING THE NOT. VEGETATIVE COVER MUST CONSIST OF A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATION WITH A DENSITY OF 70PERCENT OF ITS EXPECTED FINAL GROWTH. VEGETATION IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE THE FUNCTION OF A SPECIFIC AREA DICTATESNO VEGETATION, SUCH AS IMPERVIOUS SURFACES OR THE BASE OF A SAND FILTER.4.PERMITTEES MUST CLEAN THE PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM OF ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND MUSTENSURE THE SYSTEM MEETS ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 15 THROUGH 19 AND IS OPERATING AS DESIGNED.5.PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT.6.PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS PRIOR TOSUBMITTING THE NOT. PERMITTEES MAY LEAVE BMPS DESIGNED TO DECOMPOSE ON-SITE IN PLACE.7.FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION ONLY, PERMIT COVERAGE TERMINATES ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS IF THE STRUCTURES ARE FINISHEDAND TEMPORARY EROSION PREVENTION AND DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER CONTROL IS COMPLETE, THE RESIDENCE SELLS TO THEHOMEOWNER, AND THE PERMITTEE DISTRIBUTES THE MPCA'S "HOMEOWNER FACT SHEET" TO THE HOMEOWNER.8.FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ON AGRICULTURAL LAND (E.G., PIPELINES ACROSS CROPLAND), PERMITTEES MUST RETURN THEDISTURBED LAND TO ITS PRECONSTRUCTION AGRICULTURAL USE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT.SEED NOTES:ALL SEED MIXES AND APPLICATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL.GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS:THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO SALVAGE AND PRESERVE EXISTING TOPSOIL NECESSARY FOR FINAL STABILIZATION AND TOALSO MINIMIZE COMPACTION IN ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. IMMEDIATELY BEFORE SEEDING THE SOIL SHALL BE TILLED TO A MINIMUMDEPTH OF 3 INCHES.TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING, MULCHING & BLANKET.SEED·TEMPORARY SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 21-112 (WINTER WHEAT COVER CROP) FOR WINTER AND 21-111 (OATS COVER CROP)FOR SPRING/SUMMER APPLICATIONS. BOTH SEED MIXES SHALL BE APPLIED AT A SEEDING RATE OF 100 LBS/ACRE.MULCH·IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING, WITHIN 24 HOURS, MNDOT TYPE 1 MULCH SHOULD BE APPLIED TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE SEEDGERMINATION. MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT 90% COVERAGE (2 TONS PER ACRE OF STRAW MULCH)SLOPES·3:1 (HORIZ/VERT.) OR FLATTER MUCH SHALL BE COVERED WITH MULCH·SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR DITCH BOTTOMS SHALL BE COVERED WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET.·SEE PLAN FOR MORE DETAILED DITCH AND STEEP SLOPE EROSION CONTROL TREATMENTS.BHATTI EDINA PROPERTIES, LLC1447 WHITE OAK DRIVECHASKA, MN 55318CONTACT: DR. AHSAN BHATTI, SARA BHATTI 2200 Zane Ave N | Minneapolis, MN 55422 www.archfieldoffice.com Cary: At your request, we reviewed the Sketch Plan submission for the proposed Bhatti GI development at 65th and Barrie Road based on our experience working with the Greater Southdale Work Group to craft a physical vision for how their guiding principles may translate to the built environment. The resulting vision for development in the district is to create an enhanced human experience along existing major and new connector streets, with overall experience shaped via landscape setbacks, building step backs, a hierarchy of street typologies, transparency at street level, minimizing the impact of the car, and managing storm water as an amenity. The outcome of our collaborations with the Work Group is described in the urban design chapter of the Greater Southdale District Plan and resulted in the Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines. The project proposed is located on a smaller parcel, and while it does not completely align with the Design Experience Guidelines, we believe that the proposed project does demonstrate several positive attributes, including: • Landscaping along Barrie Road is consistent for pedestrian-oriented streets. • Outdoor public realm space is accessible to both occupants of the building and residential neighborhood to the north. • Parking below grade and on grade parking has been screened from view from both W 65th Street and Barrie Road. Our specific comments on the proposed plan are as follows: Building Orientation and Parking Access: The Guideline diagrams illustrate primary intersections along 65th: at France, Drew, Barrie, York, and Xerxes, all of which reinforce 65th as a major east-west street through the Medical District. It also provides for a transition between residential and healthcare-related services. The Guidelines imagine 65th as a well- traveled pedestrian street offering connections through the Medical District and on streets like Barrie Road and Drew, connections to the Southdale Center District. This proposal does not recognize 65th and Barrie Road as a primary intersection as it locates one of the two parking entries, trash pick up, exit stair etc. along nearly the entire building face at 65th. None of these offer any benefit to the public realm experience. It is our recommendation that the main To City of Edina Cary Teague, Community Development Director 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 From Mic Johnson, FAIA Date September 16, 2021 entry currently shown on the southeast corner of the building be located at 65th and Barrie Road, thereby moving access to parking and building services such as trash to the south end of the building and the center of the block, particularly in light of the greater setback along Barrie Road allows for the greater screening of those elements than can be accomplished along 65th where the sidewalk is narrower and there are fewer opportunities for screening. In this scenario, the outdoor public space would also move closer to Barrie Road, stretching it along the east side of Barrie Road and facilitating greater public impact and identity. The image below simply ‘flips’ the rendering provided in the sketch plan packet as an illustration of this concept. [Not to be intended as a final solution] • Material Usage. The use of certain materials (brick and stone) are appropriate to the Medical District and are consistent with the Experience Guidelines. However, the Guidelines discourage the use of metal panel on building faces below 60’ in height and facing the public realm. The current design uses metal panel as its primary building cladding above the ground floor. We would suggest metal panel could be allowed on the entire west face of the building and a portion of the south facade, with brick used on the east and north facades—which have greater impact on the public realm experience. In addition, the design uses stone as a feature element at the center of the east façade. We would encourage the use of stone in areas where it has a greater impact on the experience of pedestirans and visitors arriving at the building. . Thank you for the opportunity to review. Please let me know if you have any questions. Mic BHATTI GI MOB EDINA, MN 09/30/21 | COMM#13177-21008 BHATTI GI MOB EDINA, MN 09/30/21 | COMM#13177-21008 NORTH-EAST PERSPECTIVE September 30, 2021 Cary Teague, AICP, Community Development Director City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: City Council Submittal - Project Narrative PROJECT: Bhatti G.I. Consultant, P.A. Medical Office Building and Surgery Center 6500 Barrie Road, Edina, MN 55435 Project Team: Developer MSP Commercial 1215 Town Centre Drive Eagan, MN 55123 Contact: Alex Young, President Phone: (651) 287-8891 Email: ayoung@MSPCommercial.net Design Team / Architecture Pope Architects, Inc. 1295 Bandana Boulevard N. Suite 200 St. Paul, MN 55108-2735 Contact: Don Rolf, AIA, Senior Project Manager Phone: (651) 789-1628 Email: drolf@popearch.com Property Owner Bhatti G.I. Consultants, P.A. 1447 White Oak Drive Chaska, MN 55318 Contact: Dr. Ahsan Bhatti Phone: 952-361-3800 Thank you for your consideration of the proposed Bhatti GI Medical Office Building and Surgery Center. The project consists of the removal of the existing outdated structure at 6500 Barrie Road and the construction of a new Class A medical office building within the existing POD 1 zoning district. The intended use of this property is to remove the existing outdated structure and provide a new Class A type medical office building within the existing POD 1 zoning district. The proposed site layout will increase the overall greenspace and provides a generous amount of landscape. The project also introduces a pedestrian sidewalk along Barrie Road and 65th Street to improve pedestrian circulation and safety. The building aesthetics will comprise of finish materials as outlined in the city ordinance for this zoned district. The project was presented to the Edina Planning Commission on September 22. The Planning Commission approved the plan with the following recommendations. Bhatti GI Consultants, Edina, MN September 30, 2021 Page 2 1. Look at options to move the parking garage entrance and trash room/pickup to the south of the building. We were able to move the access point for the grade-level parking to the south side of the building. It is possible to move the trash room to the southeast corner of the building, but the east façade is the major elevation of this long narrow building. It would also necessitate moving the south stair and elevator off of the building corner, which will make an awkward corner on the tenant floors of the building. 2. Move the main building entrance to the northeast corner of the building. Moving the parking access to the south side of the building allowed us to move the main building entrance to the northeast corner of the building. 3. Improve pedestrian access on the north side by extending the sidewalk the full property east to west. We added a sidewalk along the northern edge of the property, along 66th Street. There will be a 5’ boulevard and a 5’ walk, which means that the sidewalk will be located partially on the subject property. 4. Increase the parking variance to allow fewer parking stalls than required by the traffic study and zoning ordinances. Moving the entrance to the grade level parking to the south end of the building caused a reduction in parking of one parking space on the site. The parking study had showed a need for 73 spaces. The current plan shows 72. Because of the nature of the Bhatti’s business (most patients are dropped off at the building), the owner believes that 72 spaces will still result in the presence of empty parking stalls at all times of the day. We are respectfully asking the City Council for approval of this project, which would allow Bhatti G.I. Consultants, P.A. to offer healthcare services to the communities within the city of Edina. We appreciate your consideration. Please contact me through email or mobile phone with any comments or questions. We look forward to hearing from you. Thank you. Best regards, Don Rolf, AIA, GGP Senior Project Manager POPE ARCHITECTS Direct (651) 789-1628 Mobile (612) 209-3042 drolf@popearch.com 1295 Bandana Blvd N, Suite 200, St. Paul, MN 55108-2735 (651) 642-9200 | www.popearch.com The CITYofEDINASite Plan Review with Variances – 6500 Barrie Road The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov2 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov3 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov4 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov5 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov6 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov7 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov8 The CITYofEDINAApplicant RequestEdinaMN.gov9Site Plan Review. Front Street (65th) Setback Variance from 30 feet to 18 feet on the north lot line (measured from the front of the building to the curb). Side Yard Setback Variance from 20 feet to 10 feet.Building Coverage Variance from 30% to 45%.Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Variance from 50% to 80%.Parking Stall Variance from 120 stalls to 72 stalls. The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov10 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov11Required Setbacks The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov12 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov13 The CITYofEDINAPrimary IssueIs the proposed reasonable to justify the proposed variances? EdinaMN.gov14 The CITYofEDINAPrimary IssueIs the proposed reasonable to justify the proposed variances? EdinaMN.gov15Yes. Staff does support the site plan and the requested variances on the site for the following reasons: 1. The Wenck parking study demonstrates there would be adequate parking to support the project. 2. The proposed setback, building coverage and floor area ratio variances are reasonable. The practical difficulty is caused by the small size of the lot and narrow width. 3. The proposed building is slightly larger than the existing building on the site. Given the property values in this area, the proposed building is reasonably sized, and far below the maximum height allowed for the site. The CITYofEDINAPrimary IssueIs the proposed reasonable to justify the proposed variances? EdinaMN.gov16 4. This lot is the narrowest in the district. The lot to the south that is the same width is held in common ownership with the larger property to the west. Therefore, the circumstance of the small lot size and narrow width are not common in this area and zoning district. These circumstances were not created by the applicant. 5. The variance would not alter the essential character of the district. There are a variety of building sizes and height in this neighborhood. The building would still be one of the smallest structures in the area. There is a large surface parking lot to the south and to the west, which would make the building appear to be located on a larger lot. 6. The proposed sidewalk would be an improvement to the area where there are currently no sidewalks. This sidewalk would allow residents to the north to walk to Southdale and surrounding area more safely. The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov17 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov18 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov19 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov20 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov21 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov22 The CITYofEDINABetter TogetherEdinaMN.gov23 The CITYofEDINARecommendationEdinaMN.gov24 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov25 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov26 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov27 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov28Sketch Plan The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov29 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov30 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov31 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov32 The CITYofEDINAEdinaMN.gov33 Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.J. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Grace Hancock, Sustainability Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Ordinance No. 2021-11: Amending Chapter 20 Concerning Green To Go Packaging Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Grant first reading to Ordinance 2021-11, amending Chapter 20 of the Edina City Code regarding Green To Go Packaging. INTRODUCTION: Executive Summary In the case of Ordinance 2021-11, the role of the Sustainability Coordinator has been to support Energy & Environment Commission’s (EEC) efforts to complete their 2021 Work Plan Initiative to “Review and recommend on development of to-go packaging ordinance and policy avenues. Includes an update to the 2016 study and report to incorporate the recently launched organics recycling program." Further, the Coordinator’s role includes gathering staff comments on this proposed ordinance from the Health Division, the staff division responsible for implementation of such an ordinance. Comments were also received from the P arks & Recreation Department, given their food service programs at City facilities. This memo of support includes these staff comments, the Green To Go Packaging Ordinance recommended by the EEC, and the EEC’s updated 2021 report on this subject. Staff Comments The City of Edina Health Division has reviewed together, and mutually agreed upon, support for the To Go Packaging ordinance. The Division supports the passing of this ordinance because it aligns with the City’s recycling and better waste management goals. The Health Division agrees this ordinance should be approved with the following minor edits made to the August 12, 2021 EEC-approved draft. These edits were approved by the EEC initiative lead, Vice Chair Horan, and have been incorporated into Appendix A: Ordinance 2021-11. Refer only to “AST M standards” rather than specific numbered rules within the standards, for simple applicability in future years as numbered rules change Recyclable packaging: do not include duplicative list in ordinance, rather refer directly to Hennepin County list of recyclable packaging Clarify that the City of Edina will follow ASTM standards and Hennepin County guidance when implementing ordinance Use state defined term “mobile food unit” when referring to food truck The Parks Department supports the ordinance, and offered the following comments on the draft: Consider extending the “Effective Date” beyond April 1, 2022 to allow food service providers to reduce current packaging inventory The Sustainability Coordinator agrees with the EEC proposal, incorporating these edits to the ordinance, and recommends Council approval of Ordinance 2021-11. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Green To Go Packaging Ordinance Ordinance 2021-11: Green To Go Packaging EEC Advisory Communication Staff Presentation October 19, 2021 Mayor and City Council Grace Hancock, Sustainability Coordinator & Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator Staff memo of support: Ordinance 2021-11 Green To Go Packaging Executive Summary In the case of Ordinance 2021-11, the role of the Sustainability Coordinator has been to support Energy & Environment Commission’s (EEC) efforts to complete their 2021 Work Plan Initiative to “Review and recommend on development of to-go packaging ordinance and policy avenues. Includes an update to the 2016 study and report to incorporate the recently launched organics recycling program.” Further, the Coordinator’s role includes gathering staff comments on this proposed ordinance from the Health Division, the staff division responsible for implementation of such an ordinance. Comments were also received from the Parks & Recreation Department, given their food service programs at City facilities. This memo of support includes these staff comments, the Green To Go Packaging Ordinance recommended by the EEC, and the EEC’s updated 2021 report on this subject. Staff Comments The City of Edina Health Division has reviewed together, and mutually agreed upon, support for the To Go Packaging ordinance. The Division supports the passing of this ordinance because it aligns with the City’s recycling and better waste management goals. The Health Division agrees this ordinance should be approved with the following minor edits made to the August 12, 2021 EEC-approved draft. These edits were approved by the EEC initiative lead, Vice Chair Horan, and have been incorporated into Appendix A: Ordinance 2021-11. - Refer only to “ASTM standards” rather than specific numbered rules within the standards, for simple applicability in future years as numbered rules change - Recyclable packaging: do not include duplicative list in ordinance, rather refer directly to Hennepin County list of recyclable packaging STAFF REPORT Page 2 - Clarify that the City of Edina will follow ASTM standards and Hennepin County guidance when implementing ordinance - Use state defined term “mobile food unit” when referring to food trucks The Parks Department supports the ordinance, and offered the following comments on the draft: - Consider extending the “Effective Date” beyond April 1, 2022 to allow food service providers to reduce current packaging inventory The Sustainability Coordinator agrees with the EEC proposal, incorporating these edits to the ordinance, and recommends Council approval of Ordinance 2021-11 found in Appendix A of this report. Supporting Material Appendix A: Ordinance 2021-11 amending Chapter 20 of Edina City Code Appendix B: EEC 2021 Advisory Communication and Report ORDINANCE NO. 2021-11 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING GREEN TO GO PACKAGING THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding Article XII to read as follows: ARTICLE XII GREEN TO GO PACKAGING DIVISION 1. - GENERALLY 20-636 Purpose and Objectives. The purpose and intent of this ordinance is to: 1. Promote waste reduction. a. Lowering the amount of greenhouse gases emitted during the incineration and landfilling of non-recyclable and compostable food and beverage packaging and non-packaging items. b. Assisting the City in reaching the waste reduction goals established by the State of Minnesota and Hennepin County. 2. Promote waste prevention. a. By encouraging the use of reusable food and beverage packaging when possible. b. By reducing or eliminating products that create waste such as single-use, disposable food and beverage packaging and non-packaging items that cannot be recycled or composted, and must be disposed of by incinerating or landfill. 3. Promote waste recycling by maximizing the amount of single-use food and beverage packaging and non-packaging items that can be recycled or composted. 4. Minimize contamination in organics and recycling. 20-637 Definitions. The following words shall have the meaning ascribed to them, unless the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Certified compostable shall mean that a material or product will biodegrade without leaving a residue or any toxicity in the soil. Any compostable plastics or lined papers must meet the ASTM standards for compostable products, as certified by the Biodegradable Products Institute or other similar independent certification bodies. Commercially compostable shall mean that certified compostable materials will biodegrade at a commercial site used to compost organic materials where the environment is carefully controlled and regulated to facilitate optimal degradation. Food and beverage packaging shall mean packaging used to serve food and beverage products intended for immediate consumption including cups, plates, bowls, serving trays, to-go containers, clamshells, wrappers, and lids. Green To Go Packaging shall mean and include any of the following: Compostable packaging: packaging that is separable from solid waste by the generator or prior to collection for the purpose of composting. Compostable packaging must be made of unlined paper (unless lining is certified compostable), certified compostable plastic that meets ASTM standards or 2 other cellulose-based packaging capable of being decomposed through composting or anaerobic digestion. Recyclable packaging: food or beverage packaging that is separable from solid waste prior to collection for the purpose of recycling. Recyclable packaging must be accepted by the local material recovery facilities (MRF) receiving and processing the materials and have existing robust recycling markets as determined by Hennepin County. This includes glass bottles, aluminum cans and plastic food and beverage packaging. Plastic food and beverage packaging that is acceptable as determined by Hennepin County. Reusable packaging shall mean food or beverage packaging that is capable of being refilled at a retail location or returned to the distributor for reuse at least once as a container for the same food or beverage. Food establishment shall mean a "food establishment" as defined by Edina City Code. Mobile food unit shall mean “mobile food unit” as defined in Edina City Code. Non-packaging food service items shall mean items that are not packaging, but are used to consume food, including straws and utensils. Single-use shall mean an item designed and intended for a single use. DIVISION 2. ON-SITE COLLECTION FOR RECYCLABLES AND COMPOSTABLE PACKAGING 20-638 Rules. No person owning, operating or conducting a food establishment or any person or organization providing free food or beverage products within the City of Edina in a manner which would require a permit or license, shall do or allow to be done any of the following within the city: Provide or possess for sale any packaging which is not green to go. Presence of food and beverage packaging other than Green to Go will be presumed as non-compliance with this ordinance This subparagraph shall not apply to manufacturers, brokers or warehouse operators, who conduct or transact no retail food or beverage business. To reduce contamination in recycling and organics, mobile use-food establishments and all other food establishments shall implement the following: Single-use cups and containers that are utilized with lids shall have lids of the same category of packaging. Recyclable packaging shall only have recyclable lids Compostable packaging shall only have compostable lids. Compostable cups shall be labeled to clearly indicate to the consumer that the cup is compostable. Labeling must include at least one of the following: The words “certified compostable,” “commercially compostable” or other language which meet ASTM standards. “Made from plants,” “bio-based,” or “biodegradable” are not acceptable alternatives on their own. 3 The logo of a third-party certification or testing body indicating the cup meets compostability standards, as approved by the City of Edina. All food establishments shall implement the following in relation to non-packaging food service items: Single-use utensils including, but not limited to, forks, spoons, and knives shall be compostable. Single-use straws of any kind shall only be provided to consumers upon request. Front- of-house straw dispensers, which allow for customers to self-serve, meet this requirement. A food establishment which utilizes single-use compostable and/or recyclable food packaging to serve consumers on-site shall have on-site collection for recyclable and/or compostable packaging. A food establishment that does not utilize single-use packaging to serve consumers on-site is exempt from the requirement to have on-site collection for recyclable and/or compostable packaging. . A food establishment that does not have dine-in seating for consumers is exempt from the requirement to have on-site collection for recyclable and/or compostable packaging. . If a mobile food unit or establishment is being hosted by an entity as part of an event or regular business, the hosting entity shall provide on-site collection for recyclable and/or compostable packaging. . Containers for the on-site collection of recyclable and/or compostable packaging shall be co- located with garbage containers. . If garbage receptacles are available to consumers, then receptacles for separating recyclable and/or compostable packaging must also be made available to consumers in the same location. . If garbage receptacles are not available to consumers and are instead placed in areas for use by staff only, then receptacles for separating recyclable and/or compostable packaging are only required in those locations. . A food establishment shall arrange for the collection of recyclable and/or compostable packaging by a licensed solid waste collector for delivery to an appropriate transfer station or processing facility. 20-639 Exclusions and Exceptions. Notwithstanding any other provisions to the contrary, this ordinance shall not apply to: Manufacturers, brokers, distributors or warehouse operators who conduct or transact no retail food or beverage business; Food and beverage service provided through patient care at hospitals and nursing homes; Food packaging pre-packaged by a manufacturer, producer or distributor; Plastic films less than ten (10) mils in thickness; Any packaging, which is not considered green to go packaging, but for which there is no commercially available alternative as determined by the City of Edina, following Hennepin County guidance. In determining whether there are commercially available alternatives, the City of Edina will consider whether 4 there is availability of green to go packaging for affected products. Every rule creating an exemption under this paragraph may be reviewed by The City of Edina. 20-640 Enforcement. The City shall have the duty and the authority to enforce provisions of this chapter pursuant to City Code Sec. 20-445. 20-641 Severability. If any part or provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person, entity, or circumstances shall be judged unconstitutional or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such judgment shall be confined in its operation to the part, provision or application which is directly involved in the controversy in which such judgment shall have been rendered, and shall not affect or impair the validity of the remainder of this ordinance or the application thereof to other persons, entities, or circumstances. Section 2. Effective Date. July 1, 2022 First Reading: 10/19/21 Second Reading: 11/3/2021 Published: Attest Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk Date: October 19, 2021 To: Edina City Council From: Energy and Environment Commission Subject: Green To Go Packaging Ordinance Action Re- quested: Review and recommend on development of to-go packaging ordinance and policy avenues. Includes an update to the 2016 study and report to incorporate the recently launched organics recycling program. BACKGROUND In 2017 the Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Policy Plan (The Plan) was adopted by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). This plan provides the framework for managing solid waste in the metro area through 2036, and supports the goals of the Waste Management Act (WMA) hierarchy; improving public health; reducing the reliance on landfills; con- serving energy and natural resources; and reducing pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. All counties in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area (TCMA) are accountable for implementing The Plan and its goal of recycling 75 percent of waste by 2030. According the MPCA, 63% of the waste created in Minnesota could be reduced, reused, recycled, or composted. However, if this waste is not diverted, and if the current trends continue, nearly 8 million tons of additional waste will end up in Minne- sota landfills over the twenty year period of The Plan. In addition, as those landfills reach capacity, some of that waste will have to (and already is) be shipped to other states, making waste management more and more expensive for residents. Therefore, counties and cities need to find strategies to promote reuse, recycling and composting. In the report Reducing Wasted Food & Packaging: A Guide for Food Services and Restaurants, written by the EPA, one of the rec- ommended strategies to reduce wasted food and packaging is to “Use packaging that is compostable or recyclable”. Zero Waste and Environmental Packaging ordinances have been enacted in surrounding communities and across the nation to deal with the problems associated with waste and single use plastics. Now, with the recently launched organics recycling program, the City of Edina has the infrastructure in place to divert both recyclable and compostable products. With the increase of food and beverage “take out” due to the pandemic, there has been a surge in single-use plastics disposal — a trend which could continue even after bars and restaurants resume “normal” activity. A packaging ordinance will help Edina reduce the waste associated with take out dinning. ASSESSMENT PACKAGING ORDINANCE AND POLYSYTRENE BANS Currently, the MPCA does not have a blanket position on policies to prohibit or restrict any single-use consumer packaging products at the city, county or state level. However, over 100 cities across the United States have implemented some version of a to-go food packaging or polystyrene ban. Page 2 In the table below are some examples of cities/states that have passed legislation on to-go food packaging or polystyrene. Polystyrene Bans/Packaging Ordinances Ordinance/Policy Enacted Rationale Ordinance Maine Prohibits establishments from processing, preparing, sell- ing or providing food or bev- erages in polystyrene. Prohibits use of plastic straws. January 1, 2021 Delayed enforcement to 7/1/21 Concern for the envi- ronment as well as hu- man health and safety. https://legisla- ture.maine.gov/stat- utes/38/title38ch15- Asec0.html Maryland A person may not sell or offer for sale in the state an EPS (expanded polystyrene) food service product; and a food service business or school may not sell or provide food or beverages in an EPS food ser- vice product. July 1, 2020 Delayed enforcement to 10/1/20 It’s bad for the environ- ment to produce, and it often ends up as litter on the side of our road. http://mgaleg.mary- land.gov/mgaweb- site/Laws/Statute- Text?article=gen&sec- tion=9-2201&enact- ments=False&ar- chived=False Minneapolis Requires all takeout food containers to be recyclable, reusable, returnable or compostable (rigid and ex- panded polystyrene are not included on the list of plas- tics meeting the requirement). Covered food establishments must have recycling and composting programs. April 22, 2015 To promote reusable, refillable, recyclable or compostable food and bever- age packaging. https://library.munic- ode.com/mn/minneap- olis/codes/code_of_or- dinances?no- deId=COOR_TIT10FO CO_CH204ENPRE- NACPA San Diego Prohibits all food containers made of polystyrene. January 1, 2019 The city’s goal is to achieve zero waste by 2040. The ordinance not only helps in achieving that goal but also improves water quality, reduces pollution and keeps our environment healthy. https://www.sandi- ego.gov/sites/de- fault/files/san_di- ego_single_use_plas- tic_reduction_ordi- nance.pdf Page 3 St. Paul Regulation of food and bever- age packaging at retail food es- tablishments to include items that are reusable, recyclable or compostable. April 2019 Effective Janu- ary 2021 Implementa- tion delayed while Council deci- des next steps Reduce the volume of landfilled waste, to mini- mize the toxic by-prod- ucts of incineration, to make the waste stream less damaging to the environment, to make St. Paul and the surrounding communi- ties more environmen- tally sound places to live. https://library.munic- ode.com/mn/st._paul/co des/code_of_ordi- nances?no- deId=PTIILECO_TITX XIIIPUHE- SAWE_CH236ENPRPL PA Fayetteville Fayetteville City Council passed an ordinance ban- ning the use of single use ex- panded polystyrene foam plates, bowls, cups, clamshells, cups, and similar products by any estab- lishment providing prepared, ready to-eat food or drink. July 1, 2020 The City Council has determined it is vital to our citizen's health and especially to our water supply of Beaver Lake that the amount of EPS that can escape into our environment should be reduced as much as possible. https://www.fayette- ville-ar.gov/Docu- mentCenter/View/1988 1/ORDINANCE-6250-- -City-Wide-EPS-Ban Seattle The City of Seattle requires all food service businesses to find recyclable or compostable packaging and service ware alternatives to all disposable food service items such as containers, cups, straws, utensils, and other products. This applies to all food service businesses, in- cluding restaurants, grocery stores, delis, coffee shops, food trucks, and institu- tional cafeterias. January 1, 2009 The production, use and disposal of expanded polystyrene food service products and disposable food service ware have significant adverse im- pacts on the environ- ment and that com- postable or recyclable alternative products are available. http://clerk.seat- tle.gov/search/ordi- nances/123307 Page 4 Charleston Operations will be required to stop using: Single-use plastic carryout bags, Non-Recyclable and Non-Compostable Dis- posable Food Containers and Service Ware, and polystyrene products. January 1, 2020 This ordinance is de- signed to protect the engine of our economy and livability of our City so businesses, particu- larly those influenced by tourism, and resi- dents can continue to enjoy what the beauty and bounty of Charleston’s water- ways offer for genera- tions to come. https://www.charleston- sc.gov/Docu- mentCenter/View/1998 7/2018-146-Environ- mentally-Acceptable- Packaging-and-Prod- ucts-Ratified?bidId= St. Louis Park Encourage the use of reusable food and beverage packaging when possible; minimize the amount of single-use, disposa- ble food and beverage packag- ing that must be thrown in the garbage, and thus disposed via incineration or landfilling; max- imize the amount of single-use food and beverage packaging items that can be recycled or composted; and minimize con- tamination in organics and re- cycling. January 1, 2017 https://www.stlou- ispark.org/home/show- publisheddocu- ment/19969/637479741 921700000 LIFECYCLE CONSIDERATIONS AND TRADE-OFFS When creating an ordinance that would ban or regulate particular products, simply evaluating a product by its end of life disposal (recycling, composting, landfilling) is not the only criteria available to judge it from an environmental perspective. There are three possible lenses through which to look at environmental impact: life cycle assessment, the preferred waste management methods, and overall material and waste trends. Life Cycle Assessment “A life cycle assessment (LCA) details all environmental impacts of a product throughout all stages of the product’s life. It takes into account the amount of resources that go into the product and the emissions, waste, and pollution that result from the manufacture, distribution, use and disposal of a product. An LCA may also detail outcomes like ecosystem toxicity and human health impacts caused throughout a product’s life cycle”. There are potential trade-offs with any given policy. “There may be trade-offs in environmental impacts because of the relative impacts of different product materials or because of how a policy affects citizen behaviors.” 1 Preferred Waste Management 1https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/p-p2s1-06.pdf Page 5 The State has developed a Waste Hierarchy (see below). Because our current rate and use of materials is not sustainable, the Waste Management Act and The Landfill Abatement Act requires that the state’s waste management system move away from incineration (waste to energy) and landfill disposal, and adopt a hierarchy for solid waste processing in order of prefer- ence: reduce, reuse, recycle, organics recycling, incineration, landfill. Incineration and landfilling being the least favorable. Therefore a product that can be reused, recycled or composted would be preferred to a product that has to be placed in the trash. MINNESOTA’S WASTE HIERARCHY Material and Waste Trends Over the last three decades there has been an overall increase and investment in the use of plastics. After efforts by many organizations and states to reduce the amount of single use food packaging, the covid pandemic created a new surge in demand for these products. A continued increase in plastics use means an increase in waste creation, oil consumption, and GHG production. In 1980, 20,000 tons of plastic was recycled. That number increased to more than 3 million tons in 2015. In addition, 2015 saw 5 million tons of plastic burned and 26 million tons landfilled.2 . An article in Packaging Digest states, “Ready-To-Eat (RTE), Ready-To-Heat (RTH), and other grab-and-go packaging con- cepts are likely to increase this market into double digits from 2021 to 2025. Specific raw material types such as expanded polystyrene foam will continue to provide low-cost options for many applications, as long as states and municipalities do not have bans on this raw material”.3 Plastic refining is a greenhouse gas intensive industry and the fastest growing. “If plastic production and use grow as cur- rently planned, by 2030, these emissions could reach 1.34 gigatons per year—equivalent to the emissions released by more than 295 new 500-megawatt coal-fired power plants. By 2050, the cumulation of these greenhouse gas emissions from plas- tic could reach over 56 gigatons”4. “Today, about 4-8% of annual global oil consumption is associated with plastics, accord- ing to the World Economic Forum. If this reliance on plastics persists, plastics will account for 20% of oil consumption by 2050."5 2https://www.epa.gov/facts-and-figures-about-materials-waste-and-recycling/plastics-material-specific-data 3https://www.packagingdigest.com/food-packaging/covid-19-and-food-packaging-one-year-later 4https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Plastic-and-Climate-Executive-Summary-2019.pdf 5https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2019/08/how-plastics-contribute-to-climate-change/ Page 6 STATUTE AND GOALS DRIVING PACKAGING ORDINANCES A packaging ordinance in the City of Edina would support our solid waste and greenhouse gas reduction goals. The Com- prehensive Plan states that Edina’s goals are to reduce GHG emissions 30% by 2025 and 80% emissions reduction by 2050. The Comp Plan also commits to 75% of solid waste annually diverted from landfills by 2030. Similarly, Hennepin County has goals of recycling 75% of waste and sending zero waste to landfills by 2030. In pursuit of those goals, Hennepin County revised its recycling ordinance on November 27, 2018. • Businesses that generate large quantities of food waste must implement food recycling by January 1, 2020. • Cities must offer curbside organics recycling service to residents by January 1, 2022. MPCA Policy Plan Goals Management Method 2020 2025 2030 2036 Recycling 51% 54% 60% 60% Organics Recovery 12% 14% 15% 15% Resource Recov- ery 35% 31% 24% 24% Max Landfill 2% 1% 1% 1% At the City, County and State level there are statutes and goals in place to reduce waste. Many neighboring cities have in- cluded packaging ordinances as a tool to meet these goals. Minneapolis adopted a packaging ordinance in 2015 and St. Louis Park enacted theirs in 2015. With the addition of Edina’s curbside organics collection it is far easier for residents to properly dispose of compostable materials. Page 7 THE ECONOMICS OF PLASTIC When looking at reducing waste, there are economic benefits to selecting materials that can have another life, materials that are recyclable and compostable. Understanding the materials that have another life, recyclable or compostable, and a market in Minnesota is important to factor in when selecting the materials for a packaging ordinance. The following is a brief over- view of the different resins that have economic value and are sorted and collected in Minnesota MRFs: Resin #1 — PET. PET is one of the most commonly used plastics in consumer products, and is found in most water and pop bottles, and some packaging. Roughly 75 percent of recycled PET (Polyethylene terephthalate) bottles go to domestic markets. Although Minnesota does not have a PET reclaimer it does have companies that purchase recycled PET flakes and pellets. The out-of-state reclaimers are not at capacity for PET, therefore, any increase of PET recovered from Minnesota would be in demand at these national and regional reclamation operations.HDPE Resin #2 — HDPE (High-Density Polyethylene). HDPE plastic is the stiff plastic used to make milk jugs, detergent and oil bottles, toys, and some plastic bags. HDPE is the most commonly recycled plastic and is considered one of the safest forms of plastic. It is a relatively simple and cost-effective process to recycle HDPE plastic for secondary use.Approximately 80% of HDPE (High-density polyethylene) stays in domestic markets. Unlike PET Minnesota does have in-state reclaimers for HDPE. Currently Minnesota’s reclaimers need to purchase HDPE from out-of-state to meet their demand of recycled HDPE. Any increase in HDPE recovery will decrease Minnesota’s need to purchase out-of-state HDPE. Resin #3 – PVC (Polyvinyl Chloride). PVC is dubbed the “poison plastic” because it contains numerous toxins which it can leach throughout its entire life cycle. Almost all products using PVC require virgin material for their construction. Prod- ucts made using PVC plastic are not recyclable and are not collected by local haulers. Resin #4– LDPE (Low-Density Polyethylene). LDPE is often found in shrink wraps, dry cleaner garment bags, squeez- able bottles, and the type of plastic bags used to package bread. When recycled, LDPE plastic is used for plastic lumber, landscaping boards, garbage can liners and floor tiles. Products made using recycled LDPE are not as hard or rigid as those made using recycled HDPE plastic. Curb side haulers will not accept plastic bags or film, because it can get caught in the machinery, delaying the sorting process and damage equipment. Many retail and grocery stores as well as the Hennepin County Drop Off Sites, however, will collect and send plastic bags and film to to be recycled. Resin#5 — PP (Polypropylene). Polypropylene plastic is tough and lightweight, and has excellent heat-resistance quali- ties. It serves as a barrier against moisture, grease and chemicals. PP is generally collected by most Haulers in the twin cities. Resin#5 - BLACK PP (Polypropylene) IS NOT RECYCLABLE. The reason main reason black PP is not collected by haulers is because there is not an after market for black plastic. Black dyes and pigments in the plastic affect the quality and value. Black plastic is also difficult to sort. Plastic is sorted using an optical light sensor and a puff of air to get the plas- tic to the right location. Black absorbs all light and thus isn't sensed and would have to somehow be picked out by hand. This is not economically or mechanistically viable because it is very hard to tell the difference between a #5 and other black plastic containers. Resin # 6 — PS (Polystyrene) IS NOT RECYCLABLE. Polystyrene is an inexpensive, lightweight and easily-formed plastic with a wide variety of uses. Because polystyrene is structurally weak and ultra-lightweight, it breaks up easily and is dispersed readily throughout the natural environment. Polystyrene is not accepted for curbside recycling in MN or many Page 8 other curbside programs. This is why polystyrene, in either form, expanded (styrofoam) or rigid, accounts for about 35% of US landfill material. Resin #7— Other (BPA, Polycarbonate and LEXAN). This category was designed as a catch-all for polycarbonate (PC) and “other” plastics, so reuse and recycling protocols are not standardized within this category. Of primary concern with #7 plastics, however, is the potential for chemical leaching into food or drink products packaged in polycarbonate con- tainers made using BPA (Bisphenol A). BPA is a xenoestrogen, a known endocrine disruptor. Resin #7 — PLA. Confusingly, #7 can also include PLA, Polylactic Acid. Polylactic Acid is a biodegradable thermoplastic aliphatic polyester. It is made with renewable resources such as corn starch, tapioca, or sugar cane and is used in composta- ble products.6 NOT ALL GREEN PACKAGING IS CREATED EQUAL Here are some eco-terms to know: Bagasse — The pulp that remains after renewable and sustainable raw materials such as bamboo, reed, rice, hemp and sugarcane are processed. Biodegradable — Solid materials that break down as a result of natural bacteria activity and disappear into the environ- ment over a period of time. Commercially Compostable — Solid materials that decay under controlled conditions in a commercial composting facil- ity utilizing microorganisms, humidity and temperature. This is different than backyard or home composting, which turns organic waste such as leaves, food scraps and lawn clippings into a soil-like fertilizer. Plastarch Material (PSM) — Resin made with various biodegradable materials and starch filler. Polylactic Acid (PLA) — Biopolymer made from plants that can be formed into linings for paper cups and other prod- ucts, such as hinged to-go containers often used for cold sandwiches and salads. Post-consumer Recycled Content — Materials such as corrugated boxes, newspapers and bottles that have been recov- ered and reprocessed after initial use by consumers. Recyclable — Materials that can be reclaimed or reprocessed into new products. Renewable and Sustainable Resources — Naturally occurring raw materials such as bamboo, reed, rice, hemp and sug- arcane that can be transplanted, harvested and replanted. STAKE HOLDER ENGAGEMENT Two Stakeholder meetings were held virtually; February 16 and February 18, 2021. The purpose of these meetings was to share details about the ordinance and get input from businesses that could help shape the ordinance. February 16, 2021 2:00pm Attendees: Michelle Horan - Energy and Environment Commission, City of Edina Melissa Seeley - Energy and Environment Commission, City of Edina Grace Hancock - Sustainability Coordinator, City of Edina Twila Singh - Organics Recycling Coordinator, City of Edina, 6https://learn.eartheasy.com/articles/plastics-by-the-numbers/ Page 9 Solvei Wilmot - Environmental Health Specialist, City of Edina, Mallory Anderson - Waste Prevention and Recycling Specialist, Hennepin County David Richoz - General Manager, COV Edina Stephen Munasinghe - Partner at Lettuce Entertain You Restaurants Jonathan Wang Keiko Niccolini - CMO & General Manager, rWare Lee Renneke - City of Edina Health Inspector Questions/Comments: David Richoz, of COV Edina was the only participant who offered feedback. He explained that there was a large problem with restaurants getting supplies of products during the pandemic. The restaurant typically keeps 7 to 10 days worth of supplies on hand, but is stockpiling more at this time. He states that he really wants to do the right thing regarding waste management. February 18, 2021, 10:00am Attendees: Michelle Horan - Edina Energy and Environment Commission Melissa Seeley - Edina Energy and Environment Commission Grace Hancock - City of Edina, Sustainability Coordinator Twila Singh - City of Edina, Organics Recycling Coordinato Solvei Wilmot - City of Edina, Environmental Health Specialist Andre Xiong - Hennepin County Keiko Niccolini - CMO & General Manager, rWare Brian Baker - Vierkant Mac Sellars - Grant Program Manager at r.Cup Bill Chrysler, General Manager, Edina Country Club Keiko Niccolini - CMO & General Manager, r.Ware Anne Spaeth, CEO Long Table Hospitality and The Lynhall Questions/Comments: Bill Chrysler, General Manager, Edina Country Club, in response to the question about packaging inventory and the pro- posed time of a year between approving an ordinance and its implementation, stated “a year would be nice as we utilize a lot of logged product that we order in bulk” Anne Spaeth stated “the start of the pandemic was very difficult. We had to go to Costco Business. Doesn’t seem to be an issue now. Lynhall orders containers once per month unless it’s a holiday”. She also asked for, and was sent the link to Hennepin County grant opportunities. NEXT STEPS The growth of plastic use and pollution, and its inevitable link with climate change needs our immediate attention. We all need to begin to make behavior changes in order to tackle this reality. No plan of attack is perfect, or without pushback and consequences, however, we have to start. Every step, no matter small or large, is a step towards our goals — waste and GHG reduction, and mitigating the impacts of climate change. By creating a preferred packaging ordinance, Edina would be leading the way in improving both Minnesota’s economy and environment with the following direct and indirect affect: • It would support Edina businesses in complying with the new recycling business legislation; • It would increase the amount of recyclable materials being diverted from the waste stream and landfills; • It would increase the amount of recovered materials going into the markets and Minnesota’s economy. Page 10 • It could help the city and businesses vision future actions that could move us closer to zero waste, focusing on waste prevention and reduction, reuse and the potential for a circular economy. • It would tackle social and environmental justice, since normally incinerations are located in low-income or communi- ties of color disproportionally impacted by environmental burdens and pollution. A packaging ordinance is one tool, the City has to address the costs and impacts of waste. Plastic production and disposal is at a point where we can no longer just recycle ourselves out of our waste problem. States, counties, cities and residents will have to make further commitments towards waste reduction by embracing new ways of "doing business”. Promoting the circular economy where businesses "design out waste and keep products and materials in use and regenerate natural systems”, along with encouraging citizens to move away from the “purchase-use-trash” linear model of consumerism to pur- chasing reusable, returnable, or fixable products are great examples of new ways of thinking that could have large impacts on our environment The Energy and Environment Commission is asking the Edina City Council to approve of a Preferred Packaging Ordinance. The CITY of EDINA Green to Go Packaging Ordinance The CITY of EDINA•Presentation of an Edina Green to Go Packaging Ordinance •Included in packet •Advisory Communication •Draft ordinance •What is a Green to Go Packaging Ordinance? •Who is affected? •Why a packaging ordinance? •Residents •Businesses •Supports city/county goals and initiatives •Contamination •Other Cities Agenda 2 The CITY of EDINA 3 Green To Go Packaging Ordinance A tool for the City to: •Promote waste reduction •Encourage recycling •Minimize contamination in organics and recycling waste streams. The CITY of EDINA Establishments Affected by Ordinance 4 Would apply to Would not apply to Anyone owning, operating or conducting a food establishment or mobile food unit Manufacturers, brokers, distributors or warehouse operators who conduct or transact no retail food or beverage business Cafeterias, coffee shops or other food establishments within hospitals or nursing homes available for the general public Food and beverage service provided through patient care at hospitals and nursing homes Items a business itself prepackages prior to sale Food packaging pre-packaged by a manufacturer, producer or distributor Catering (would rely on event venues to institute) Plastic films less than ten(10) mils in thickness The CITY of EDINAWhy a Packaging Ordinance? •Reduce plastic waste •Reduce single use plastics •Straws and utensils •Restaurant take out containers •Coffee cups and lids 5 Residents The CITY of EDINAWhy a Packaging Ordinance? •Being green is good business •Policy to support what they are already doing •Level playing field for packaging costs •More demand, more options, decrease in pricing 6 Business The CITY of EDINAWhy a Packaging Ordinance? •Recycle 75% of waste by 2030 •Reduce city wide generation of greenhouse gas emissions 30% by 2030 and 80% by 2050 •Climate Action Plan •Green Business Recognition Program 7 City/County Goals and initiatives The CITY of EDINAWhy a Packaging Ordinance? 8 Contamination Polystyrene Rigid and Foam •No Aftermarket •Ends up in landfill Black Plastic •Cannot be sorted •Not as marketable •Ends up in landfill 1. Not All Plastic Resins Are Recyclable The CITY of EDINAWhy a Packaging Ordinance? 9 Contamination •Compostable packaging shall only have compostable lids •Recyclable packaging shall only have recyclable lids •Consumer behavior of disposing packaging/cup and lid 2. Specifying Like Materials on Like The CITY of EDINAWhy a Packaging Ordinance? 10 Contamination •Provide bins for all waste streams •Co-locate waste bins to allow proper sorting 3. Sorting The CITY of EDINAWhy a Packaging Ordinance? 11 Surrounding Cities Have Successfully Implemented Such Ordinances •Edina business and restaurants are aware - some already doing it. Jared Olson - 50th and France Starbucks. •Residents are aware - wondering if Edina will enact it The CITY of EDINA OUR ASK 12 The CITY of EDINA Thank you! Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.K. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Approve Revised 30% Design Layout for Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project Action, Discussion CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve revised 30% design layout for the Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project. INTRODUCTION: Staff will report on the revised 30% design layout and public engagement for Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project. The layout was updated after the September 21, 2021 City Council meeting. Attached is an updated staff report modified based on discussion from the September 21, 2021 Council meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Approve 30% Design Revised 30% Design Layout Revised CIP Stakeholder Engagement Report Stakeholder Engagement Report Appendix 1 Stakeholder Engagement Report Appendix 2 Stakeholder Engagement Report Appendix 3 Staff Presentation October 19, 2021 Mayor and City Council Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Ross Bintner, P.E., Engineering Services Manager Jessica Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator Approve Revised 30% Design Layout for Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project Executive Summary: Staff collected additional feedback before and during the September 21, 2021, City Council Meeting. Residents provided input outside of the structured meeting in the entry area of City Hall. The City Council provided input during the structured meeting. Based on the feedback, staff has revised the 30% design. The revised 30% design was modified as such. 1. Ice rink to remain in existing location. Rink lighting and boards will be improved as part of a separate contract. 2. Open skate area from ice rink to Grimes Ave unchanged and may be considered as part of a future Park’s improvement project. This removed the nature play concept, pavilion structure, soil amendments, and irrigation improvements. 3. Removal of outfield fences between the new baseball/softball fields to retain multi-use field. 4. Creation of a large open space between the new baseball/softball fields by piping the swale under the fields, includes grading, soil amendments and irrigation systems. The revised layout that maintains two multiuse fields will add approximately $500,000 in additional grading and pipe to safely transmit flood flows across the park, and under the southeast multi use field. Staff will continue to look for opportunities to value engineer the project to better align with the initial budget estimate. Staff has posted the revised 30% design to the BetterTogetherEdina website, directly corresponded with the Morningside Neighborhood Association, and directly corresponded with the Morningside athletic group. Staff recommends approval of the attached 30% design concept and to end this phase of public engagement to keep this flood infrastructure project on schedule. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Information / Background This recommendation was approved at the City Council work meeting April 20, 2021, and reviewed at the September 21, 2021, Meeting. The purpose of this report is to check in a second time at the 30% design phase of the Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project on meeting commitments of the approved project goals, requirements, and resources for project design and closing the loop on formal public input on park features. A new design consideration was included based on Council input from the September 21, 2021, meeting: To retain multiuse fields in design. 30% Recommendations The preliminary recommendation approved at the April 20, 2021, meeting is modified and augmented as shown below with strikethrough and underlining. The design creates infrastructure consistent with the “Bigger” option, with the following features included in design (see Table 1 and Figure 2 of the tech memo); 1. An expanded and lowered Weber Pond, (tech memo Feature 1) including: a. Expansion into Weber Woods and the removal of approximately 6 acres of trees b. Natural resource restoration and improvement of the entire Weber Woods land area c. Creation of nature trails and a one or more bridges or floating boardwalks connecting east to west across the pond 2. An expanded and lower Lynn/Kipling inundation area (tech memo feature 4) including: a. Tree removal along most of the basin, with several tree stands saved b. A mixed wetland and pond, with aquatic and upland natural resource restoration 3. An expanded pipe and swale to provide overflow from the Lynn/Kipling inundation area and the Grimes Avenue low point (tech memo features 2 and 3) including: a. A box culvert along the 41st right-of-way and easement corridor between homes i. A box culvert along the 41st right-of-way will be used only if a 42nd Street Pipe cannot be feasibly upsized to accommodate additional flood flow. b. A landscaped swale along the north side of the active play spaces in Weber Park in an alignment and scale that minimizes impacts to provide high flow and clean water benefits, including an east to west park trail. 4. An expanded and reconfigured pipe network extending west on 42nd, south on Crocker, east on Morningside Road, south on Grimes, and west on Branson minor grade changes on Grimes and Crocker (Technical Memo features 9, 9a, and 10) and minor grade changes on 40th (part of Technical Memo feature 8) including: a. Expanded surface inlets to fully utilize pipe capacity in extreme events b. Minor changes to grades in streets and curb lines to reduce potential surface flows or flood backflow into low or landlocked areas. The 30% design uses the strategies, design goals, considerations, and opportunities consistent with the Council approval at the April 20, 2021, with comments underlined. 1. Affirm strategy, design goals, considerations, and opportunities (also described in section 2 above). a. Strategy; Risk transfer with pipe, and mitigation and additional flood reduction with storage STAFF REPORT Page 3 b. Design goals: i. No increase in risk to any individual property (goal met) ii. Balance the risk and benefit of the project (goal met) iii. No private property will be proposed for acquisition and no floodwalls are needed as no flood stages are higher in the proposed design (goal met) c. Include as design consideration: i. Consider future climate change in design (used in design to size emergency flow paths and informs balance between storage and risk-transfer with larger pipes) ii. Limit impact at Weber Park by focusing pond expansion in Weber Woods, using a pumped outlet to lower the outlet water elevation, and using smart infrastructure approach of predictive pumping ahead of extreme events. (Used in design to size emergency flow paths, informs balance) iii. Retain multiuse fields in design (new 10/19/21) d. Take advantage of opportunity: i. Enhance natural areas where impacts occur (goal met) ii. Consider park improvements where impacts occur (goal met) iii. Remove or reduce potential for flood overflow into private property through minor changes in grade (goal met) iv. Add inlets in low areas to fully utilize pipe (goal met) e. Tradeoffs i. Project will use park space in Weber Park, Weber Woods, and Lynn/Kipling inundation area (List of features from “Bigger” option described in section 5 to bring forward.) (Tradeoff made, optimized to reduce impacts) 2. Public participation has been conducted inform the public and project about park landscape aesthetics choices, consistent with the public participation plan approved by Council at the April 20, 2021, meeting and the Council “Better Together” public participation strategy. Budget and Schedule / Next Steps The revised CIP approved included $1.4M of professional services in 2021, $9.5M $10M of capital improvement in and 0.5M professional services in 2022, and $0.1M of professional services and $0.5M of capital improvement in 2023. Preliminary design work is has found minor grant funding available for flood work that could reduce capital costs, and contaminated dredge materials that require landfill that could increase capital costs. The design team is working to value engineer to reduce costs. The revised layout maintains two multiuse fields and will add cost of approximately $500,000 in additional grading and pipe to safely transmit flood flows across the park, and under the southeast multi use field. The design team is recommending the project be delivered in three contracts. The first contract will be a tree clearing done in Winter 2021/22. The propose of this early contract is to meet goals and regulatory requirements to protect species that use trees in Spring and Summer. The park and earthwork to create flood storage will take place in a grading and utilities contract. The upstream pipe capacity work will take place as part of the 2022 Neighborhood Street Recon project. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Expected schedule Q3 2021 (late) Public comment period ends, 30-60% design work, regulatory permits Q4 2021; Regulatory permits, final design work Q1 2022 Award tree clearing contract Q2 2022 (early) Award grading/park project Q2 2022 (early) Award neighborhood recon project (includes majority of pipe project) Q2 2022 (mid) Construction Starts Attachments (repeated from 4/20/21 approval and 9/21/21 1st 30% check in) and new or updated Revised Layouts Stakeholder Engagement Report Revised CIP Past reports to Council September 21, 2021 Council Meeting – 30% Design Check In April 20, 2021 Council Meeting - Staff Recommendation March 16, 2021 Council Work Session – Preliminary Staff Recommendation September 1, 2020 Council Work Session – Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project Update April 21, 2020 Approve Public Participation Plan for Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project and Request for Purchase for Engineering and Engagement Services Public Participation Plan April 7, 2020 Flood Risk Reduction Strategy approval March 5, 2019 FRRS Strategy Update September 5, 2018 – Adoption of 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan April 3, 2018 – Work Session – Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan – Implementation Discussion January 17, 2018 – Authorize Staff to Submit Draft Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan for Agency Review November 21, 2017 – Work Session – Draft 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Presentation for Review and Comment Water Resources Library – Historical Morningside Neighborhood Stormwater Reports May 17, 2016 – Weber Woods Purchase Agreement Morningside Flood Infrastructure ProjectProvide your feedback for these concepts at: www.bettertogetheredina.org/morningsideNFeet0 10 20 30 40Preserved TreesLynn/Kipling Inundation AreaNew Tree PlantingsNew Tree PlantingsPreserved TreesNative Plantings for HabitatNative Plantings for HabitatNative Plantings for Habitat2021KIPLING AVENUE W 42nd STREETLYNN AVENUEFeet0 20 40 80NRevised 30% Concept Design - Weber Park, Weber Pond + Weber Woods10/12/2021Weber PondWeber Park12’ Utility VehicleAccess PathNature Trails, UnpavedExisting Nature TrailOak SavannaRestorationBoardwalkBoardwalkExisting SidewalkAccess into ParkExisting TennisCourtsPavement reductionand improved accessibilityExisting WarmingHouseExisting BasketballCourtExisting Playgroundand Oak TreesGolden Years’ MontessoriAvail AcademyGRIMES AVENUE SW 42nd STREETFRANCE AVENUE SAccess into ParkAccess into ParkNew Plantings whereGrading OccursNew Plantings whereGrading OccursNew Plantings whereGrading OccursDrainage Swale FeatureParking LotImprovementsParking LotImprovements6’ Summer TrailNature Trails, UnpavedSeating Area/OverlookBench/SeatingExisting TurfExisting Ice RinkReconstructed Ball Fields (Irrigated) City of Edina 2019-203 CIP Change Request Form 4/21/2016 4:37 PM Project Name Project Contact Project Number Department Head Project in 3ULRU CIP? Department Project Description (what and where?) – include enough detail that a person who is unfamiliar with the project before reading this can understand what we are proposing. Strategic Justification (why?) – describe why the City should do this project. Usually the City’s top priorities are set by the Council in documents like Vision (GLQD, Comp Plan, or City Work Plan. City of Edina 2019-203 CIP Change Request Form 4/21/2016 4:37 PM Environmental considerations – list environmental effects to consider. Are "greener" alternatives being considered? Already Future Total Expenditures (describe) Spent 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Years Project 1 2 3 4 5 Total Expenditures Funding Sources: List all known funding. If there is none identified yet, specify "Construction Fund". 1 2 3 4 5 6 Total Funding Sources Project Costs (how much?) and Financing (how?) - include everything. Expenditures might include construction, consultants, hardware, software, etc. Funding might include donations, state grants, special assessments, etc. Comments on costs and financing, if necessary. Are there any ongoing costs/benefits to consider? October 19, 2021 Mayor and City Council Jessica V. Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator Stakeholder Engagement Report Executive Summary Staff revised the concept design after the September 21 to react to input about the need for continued open multi-use space and the desire to keep the permanent hockey rink in its original location. The concept design was revised to add a culvert underneath the proposed multi-use open field space that transmits low flows but could flood and transmit high flows in extreme events. The open skate and permanent rink areas will not be impacted by the project and thus are not included in the proposed project boundary in the revised concept. The nature play and shelter/pavilion have been removed from the concept design to balance the increased costs of adding a culvert under the multi-use fields. These features could be considered for the future, not associated with this flood infrastructure project. This phase of the project was done at the ‘Consult’ level of public participation. The conceptual phase that preceded it from May 2020 through April 20th, 2021 was at the ‘Involve’ level. The public participation level will pivot once again at the conclusion of this phase of the project to ‘Inform’. The goal will be to provide the public with balanced and objective information to assist them in understanding the problem, alternatives, opportunities and/or solutions. The promise to the public going forward is to keep them informed. Background Engagement for the Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project began in May 2020. The initial effort was summarized in the January 2021 engagement report. This report summarizes the Weber Park landscape design process engagement which was approved by City Council in April 2021. STAFF REPORT Page 2 At their April 2021 meeting, City Council approved the staff recommendation which; 1. Affirmed strategy, design goals, considerations and opportunities. a. Strategy; Risk transfer with pipe, and mitigation and additional flood reduction with storage b. Design goals; i. No increase in risk to any individual property ii. Balance the risk and benefit of the project iii. No private property will be proposed for acquisition and no floodwalls are needed as no flood stages are higher in the proposed design c. Include as design consideration; i. Consider future climate change in design ii. Limit impact at Weber Park by focusing pond expansion in Weber Woods, using a pumped outlet to lower the outlet water elevation, and using smart infrastructure approach of predictive pumping ahead of extreme events. d. Take advantage of opportunity; i. Enhance natural areas where impacts occur ii. Consider park improvements where impacts occur iii. Remove or reduce potential for flood overflow into private property through minor changes in grade iv. Add inlets in low areas to fully utilize pipe e. Tradeoffs i. Project will use park space in Weber Park, Weber Woods, and Lynn/Kipling inundation area 1. An expanded and lowered Weber Pond, including: a. Expansion into Weber Woods and the removal of approximately 6 acres of trees b. Natural resource restoration and improvement of the entire Weber Woods land area c. Creation of nature trails and a bridge or floating boardwalk connecting east to west across the pond 2. An expanded and lower Lynn/Kipling inundation area including: a. Tree removal along most of the basin, with several tree stands saved b. A mixed wetland and pond, with aquatic and upland natural resource restoration 3. An expanded pipe and swale to provide overflow from the Lynn/Kipling inundation area including: a. A box culvert along the 41st right-of-way and easement corridor between homes b. A landscaped swale along the north side of the active play spaces in Weber Park to provide high flow and clean water benefits, including an east to west park trail. STAFF REPORT Page 3 4. An expanded and reconfigured pipe network extending west on 42nd, south on Crocker, east on Morningside Road, south on Grimes, and west on Branson minor grade changes on Grimes and Crocker and minor grade changes on 40th including: a. Expanded surface inlets to fully utilize pipe capacity in extreme events b. Minor changes to grades in streets and curb lines to reduce potential surface flows or flood backflow into low or landlocked areas. 2. Modified Capital Improvement Plan item 19-341 to include estimated design professional services costs in 2021 of $1.4M, construction professional services in 2022 of $0.5M, capital expenses of $9.5M in 2022, and $0.5M in 2023, totaling $10M in capital and $2M in professional services, in addition to the $0.25M previously allocated to engagement and concept design work. 3. Authorized City Manager to sign professional service scope of service with Barr Engineering for Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project for a cost not to exceed $1.204M. 4. Approved the public participation plan to inform the public and project about park landscape aesthetics choices. Public Participation Plan and Process The public participation plan reflects the direction from the Council as described in the background section. Flood risk reduction is the primary service leading the design. Changes to features and public input on it would be considered insofar as it would be in service to the primary flood protection purpose of the project. The level of public participation for this phase of the design was ‘Consult’. The goal was to obtain public feedback on analysis, alternatives and/or decisions. The promise made was to keep the public informed, listen to and acknowledge concerns and aspirations, and provide feedback on how public input influenced the decision. Stakeholders included residents in the Morningside neighborhood, the Morningside Neighborhood Association, the Park and Recreation Commission, Avail Academy, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, City of St Louis Park, and City of Minneapolis. The engagement strategy included direct mail, an open house, a City Council update, and a project webpage, www.BetterTogetherEdina.org/morningside. The Public Participation Plan as shown below was amended to include a revised concept design and subsequent City Council approval, described in more detail in the sections below. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Share the Concept Design Staff presented the initial 30% concept design through the Better Together Edina project webpage and hosted an open house on August 17th. Large poster exhibits were printed and hung at the permanent hockey rink fencing. Lawn signs were posted at the entrances to Weber Woods on the north and east sides, at the south parking lot of Weber Park, the corner of Grimes and 42nd Street, and the east and west sides of the Lynn/Kipling Inundation Area to direct people to the exhibits and project webpage. The exhibits remained posted at the park until after the September 21st City Council presentation. Postcards were mailed in early August to all properties in the Morningside neighborhood (appendix). Approximately 40 people attended the open house. The Weber Park 30% Plan PDF was downloaded 384 times, the Lynn/Kipling Inundation Area 30% Plan PDF was downloaded 147 times, and the representative imagery examples PDF was downloaded 132 times (summary report in appendix). We heard a range of feedback related to flood infrastructure, natural resources, Weber Park and Weber Woods. GENERAL • Clarify how this looks. • Clarify the impact to specific areas. STAFF REPORT Page 5 • Talk to more people, extend the comment period. • “Are you still accommodating how I use the park and woods?” FLOOD INFRASTRUCTURE • “Does the flood benefit still accrue?” • Park swale cuts open space in two, making it smaller; keep large open space. NATURAL RESOURCES – PARKS, WOODS, LYNN/KIPLING • Add native plant restoration areas to park, or not? • “Will this project be a ‘loss’ for wildlife and dog-walking?” • Clarify the impact to specific trees, explain the approach to trees and natural area restoration. WEBER PARK AND WOODS • “Why is this so focused on the park?” • Do/Don’t add other amenities – pool, skate park, soccer, playground, disk golf, etc. • Do/Don’t add fence in Woods. • Don’t add outfield fence at baseball/softball fields. • Leave more open space [or] replace more trees? • Reconfigure hockey rink, or not? • Improve turf and open field areas. Council Update Another round of postcards was mailed to inform stakeholders of the upcoming City Council presentation on September 21st. Staff made updates to the concept based on resident feedback in advance of the City Council presentation. Input Used • Open ice skate rink size increased • Trees moved to edges • More open, irrigated field for unprogrammed play in center of park • Picnic/seating area, covered pavilion • The size and placement of new natural planting areas is a detail often decided later in the design process Input Not Used • Amenities not added: Skate park, pool/splash pad, volleyball, disk golf • Swale placement between baseball/softball fields remains part of design STAFF REPORT Page 6 • Outfield fencing at baseball/softball fields remains part of design • New rink placement along Grimes remains part of design Although the presentation to City Council did not include a public hearing, several people attended the meeting to listen to the presentation. Staff were available to discuss the project with people in the City Hall lobby before the meeting started and talked with approximately a dozen people. There seemed to be two main ideas represented among the group. First, a group advocating for a reduced scale in the pond size adjacent to Weber Woods and second, a group advocating for open multi-use space in the formal Weber Park area. Revised Concept for multi-use space Staff revised the concept design after the September 21 to react to input about the need for continued open multi-use space and the desire to keep the permanent hockey rink in its original location. Further, the Park System Strategic Plan calls out a need for multi-use space use. The revised concept design maintains that use at Weber Park. The concept design was revised to add a culvert underneath the proposed multi-use open field space that transmits low flows but could flood and transmit high flows in extreme events. The open skate and permanent rink areas will not be impacted by the project and thus are not included in the proposed project boundary in the revised concept. The nature play and shelter/pavilion have been removed from the concept design to balance the increased costs of adding a culvert under the multi-use fields. These features could be considered for the future, not associated with this flood infrastructure project. A copy of the revised concept is available in the appendix. Staff will seek Council approval of the revised concept at their October 19th City Council meeting. Upon approval, the public involvement portion of the design ends and staff will advance to the next phase of design. Conclusion This phase of the project was done at the ‘Consult’ level of public participation. The conceptual phase that preceded it from May 2020 through April 20th, 2021 was at the ‘Involve’ level. The public participation level will pivot once again at the conclusion of this phase of the project to ‘Inform’. The goal will be to provide the public with balanced and objective information to assist them in understanding the problem, alternatives, opportunities and/or solutions. The promise to the public going forward is to keep them informed. STAFF REPORT Page 7 Appendices Appendix 1 • Public Participation Plan, approved April 20th, 2021 • Postcards (2) • BTE summary May 2020 – April 20, 2021 • BTE summary April 21, 2021 – October 12, 2021 Appendix 2 • Open house exhibits Appendix 3 • Revised 30% plan PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN I MORNINGSIDE FLOOD INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT I CITY OF EDINA 1 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN MORNINGSIDE FLOOD INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT DECISION TO BE MADE - Develop Weber Park landscape design consistent with flood infrastructure elements and budget approved by City Council with the Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project decision. (www.BetterTogetherEdina.org/Morningside). - Staff will update City Council at the 30% design milestone. - Staff will make a request for purchase for construction, City Council will decide. DECISION CRITERIA IN SCOPE - Natural areas restoration - Walking paths - Ball fields and rink placement - Irrigation - Tree removal and planting - Pond and park grading - Lynn/Kipling open space grading and natural areas restoration OUT OF SCOPE - Roadway reconstruction elements such as street width, and sanitary sewer and water improvements DECISIONS ALREADY MADE - Consistent with the purchase agreement, Weber Woods shall be used solely for public park purposes, including open space, outdoor recreation, and dog park, and similar uses and facilities; stormwater management facilities; and public utilities. - Roadway reconstruction schedule - Renewal of sanitary sewer, water, and storm sewer utilities included in roadway reconstruction project - A dedicated bicycle facility along the east side of Grimes Avenue will be installed during construction - Concept-level flood infrastructure elements and budget approved by City Council - At least two ball fields will be included in the design - The number of skate facilities (1 rink and 1 open skate) will remain the same - Rink lighting will be replaced - No changes to the warming house - No changes to the tennis courts - No changes to the playground - No changes to the basketball court OTHER CONSIDERATIONS - Neighboring Cities - Roadway reconstruction is guided by the Living Streets Plan - Walking and biking facilities are guided by the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan - Safety improvements are guided by the City’s Traffic Safety Committee and existing City policies LEGAL OR TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN I MORNINGSIDE FLOOD INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT I CITY OF EDINA 2 - FEMA floodplain designation - Minnehaha Creek Watershed District rules - Minnesota Department of Natural Resources rules PROJECT TIMELINE - Spring 2021 through early 2022 for engagement and design. - The Engineering Study for the road reconstruction would occur concurrently. Construction would start in the spring of 2022. STAKEHOLDERS - Morningside Neighborhood - Morningside Neighborhood Association - Park and Recreation Commission - Avail Academy (formerly Calvin Christian School) - Minnehaha Creek Watershed District - City of St Louis Park - City of Minneapolis ROLES RESIDENTS Expertise in sense of place, neighborhood feel, public attitudes, community values, desired amenities, tax burden. - Provides their expertise on values - Reviews concept - Communicates questions and concerns STAFF Expertise in engineering, water and natural resources management, flood risk, transportation planning and safety, street and utility construction, parks and recreation, and landscape architecture. - Develops design based on technical expertise and professional judgement - Communicates the costs, tradeoffs, constraints, and impacts (economic, social, environmental) - Considers feedback from stakeholders - Seeks direction from Council on political decisions and operates within parameters set by Council - Describes how the public influenced the concept design - Memorializes engagement process and decision - Closes the loop with the public - Implements the decision made by Council CITY COUNCIL Decision-making body. - Shares the feedback received directly from stakeholders with the project team in a timely manner so that all have the same information - Decides funding level and source - Defines level of service - Sets parameters for improvements in public spaces such as streets, right-of-way, and parks PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN I MORNINGSIDE FLOOD INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT I CITY OF EDINA 3 - Approves design PUBLIC PARTICIPATON LEVEL CONSULT - Goal: To obtain public feedback on analysis, alternatives and/or decisions. - Promise: We will keep the public informed, listen to and acknowledge concerns and aspirations, and provide feedback on how public input influenced the decision. TECHNIQUES - Better Together Edina website - Social media (Next Door, Facebook, Twitter) - Community Meetings DECISION PROCESS Objective Staff will inform people of the project and process. This is an extension of the Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project. Staff will present the 30% concept design and solicit feedback. Staff will consider feedback. Staff will provide an update to City Council. Staff will make a request for purchase for construction following a competitive bid process. City Council will make a decision. Staff will communicate the final design to the public. Staff will archive the project and process online. Anticipated Outcomes People know how and when to provide feedback. People have access to information. People have the ability to provide their feedback. Staff have listened to and acknowledged resident feedback. People know how feedback was used. Staff have listened to and acknowledged resident feedback. People know how feedback was used. The staff recommendation aligns with City Council direction. People know what decision was made. People can view the information and process on the BetterTogetherEdina webpage. Timeline Spring 2021 Summer 2021 Summer or Fall 2021 Spring 2022 Spring 2022 Close the loop Project Authorization Council Update Share Concept Design Introduce Project See and share your input on the initial design of flood infrastructure in the Morningside Neighborhood! We’ll move to inside the shelter in case of rain. For more information, call 952-826-0445. 4-6 p.m. Tuesday, Aug. 17 Weber Park 4115 Grimes Ave. S. MORNINGSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD FLOOD INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT City of Edina Engineering 7450 Metro Blvd. Edina, MN 55439 The plans can also be viewed online at BetterTogetherEdina.org/ Morningside. Comments will be accepted through Aug. 31. The Edina City Council will soon weigh in on the initial design of flood infrastructure in the Morningside Neighborhood! BetterTogetherEdina.org/ Morningside Please send your feedback and questions on the 30% design concepts. You can tell us what you think at any time, but it will be most helpful if we could hear from you sooner. Staff will present a project update to the Edina City Council and seek feedback from Council Members. For more information, call 952-826-0445. 7 p.m. Tuesday, Sept. 21 Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. MORNINGSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD FLOOD INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT City of Edina Engineering 7450 Metro Blvd. Edina, MN 55439 Watch and Listen! • Edina TV • Facebook.com/EdinaMN • Youtube.com/EdinaTV Presorted Std U.S. Postage PAID Twin Cities, MN Permit No. 3932 Summary Report 01 May 2020 - 20 April 2021 Better Together Edina PROJECTS SELECTED: 1 Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project FULL LIST AT THE END OF THE REPORT Highlights TOTAL VISITS 2.7 k MAX VISITORS PER DAY 100 NEW REGISTRATI ONS55 ENGAGED VISITORS 43 INFORMED VISITORS 700 AWARE VISITORS 1.5 k Visitors Summary Pageviews Visitors Visits New Registrations 1 Jul '20 1 Jan '21 500 1000 1500 2000 Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 01 May 2020 to 20 April 2021 PARTICIPANT SUMMARY ENGAGED INFORMED AWARE 43 ENGAGED PARTICIPANTS 0023 0017 000 001 000 000 005 008 008 Registered Unverified Anonymous Contributed on Forums Participated in Surveys Contributed to Newsfeeds Participated in Quick Polls Posted on Guestbooks Contributed to Stories Asked Questions Placed Pins on Places Contributed to Ideas* A single engaged participant can perform multiple actions Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project…43 (2.8%) (%) * Calculated as a percentage of total visits to the Project ENGAGED INFORMED AWARE 700 INFORMED PARTICIPANTS 40 20 286 65 49 0 563 43 Participants Viewed a video Viewed a photo Downloaded a document Visited the Key Dates page Visited an FAQ list Page Visited Instagram Page Visited Multiple Project Pages Contributed to a tool (engaged) * A single informed participant can perform multiple actions Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project…700 (46.2%) (%) * Calculated as a percentage of total visits to the Project ENGAGED INFORMED AWARE 1,514 AWARE PARTICIPANTS 1,514 Participants Visited at least one Page * Aware user could have also performed an Informed or Engaged Action Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project…1,514 * Total list of unique visitors to the project Page 2 of 7 FORUM TOPICS SUMMARY TOP 3 FORUM TOPICS BASED ON CONTRIBUTORS SURVEYS SUMMARY TOP 3 SURVEYS BASED ON CONTRIBUTORS NEWSFEEDS SUMMARY TOP 3 NEWSFEEDS BASED ON VISITORS STORIES SUMMARY TOP 3 STORIES BASED ON CONTRIBUTORS Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 01 May 2020 to 20 April 2021 ENGAGEMENT TOOLS SUMMARY 3 FORUM TOPICS 3 SURVEYS 60 NEWS FEEDS 0 QUICK POLLS 0 GUESTBOOKS 1 STORIES 1 Q&A'S 1 PLACES 3 3 Forum Topics 23 Contributors 107 Contributions June 3, 2020 Virtual Meeting #1 13 Contributors to December 9, 2020 Virtual Meeting #3 10 Contributors to September 3, 2020 Virtual Meeting #2 8 Contributors to 3 Surveys 17 Contributors 19 Submissions Morningside Flooding Poll 17 Contributors to Initial Concepts Reaction 2 Contributors to Refined Concept Reaction 0 Contributors to 60 NewsFeed 141 Visits 119 Visitors Your feedback is welcome and appreciated! 19 Visitors to Reminder - Virtual Meeting #3 starts tomorrow 12 Visitors to Weber Park Field Activity open through July 6th 12 Visitors to 1 Stories 0 Contributors 0 Submissions Share your story 0 Authors to Page 3 of 7 Q & A SUMMARY TOP 3 Q & A BASED ON CONTRIBUTORS PLACES SUMMARY TOP 3 PLACES BASED ON CONTRIBUTORS IDEAS SUMMARY TOP 3 IDEAS BASED ON CONTRIBUTORS Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 01 May 2020 to 20 April 2021 ENGAGEMENT TOOLS SUMMARY 1 Q&As 5 Contributors 8 Questions Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project 5 Contributors to 1 Places 8 Contributors 20 Pins Morningside Neighborhood 8 Contributors to 3 Ideas 8 Contributors 20 Contributions Flood Infrastructure Scenarios Reactions and Ideas 6 Contributed to Flood Infrastructure Refined Concept - Reactions and Ideas 3 Contributed to 30 percent design 0 Contributed to Page 4 of 7 DOCUMENTS TOP 3 DOCUMENTS BASED ON DOWNLOADS PHOTOS TOP 3 PHOTOS BASED ON VIEWS VIDEOS TOP 3 VIDEOS BASED ON VIEWS FAQS TOP 3 FAQS BASED ON VIEWS KEY DATES TOP 3 KEY DATES BASED ON VIEWS Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 01 May 2020 to 20 April 2021 INFORMATION WIDGET SUMMARY 24 DOCUMENTS 4 PHOTOS 6 VIDEOS 1 FAQS 1 KEY DATES 24 Documents 286 Visitors 607 Downloads Technical_Memo_Feb2021.pdf 131 Downloads FINALIZED Preliminary Report_March 16 Work Session.pdf 94 Downloads Infrastructure Scenarios_Oct2020.pdf 73 Downloads 4 Photos 20 Visitors 24 Views County Ditch 17.jpg 20 Views GregLincoln_owl.JPG 4 Views Aerial photo_1971 0 Views 6 Videos 40 Visitors 66 Views Flood Risk in the Morningside Neighborhood - a closer look 20 Views Flood Risk in the Morningside Neighborhood 19 Views Agenda: Edina - Flood Risk Reduction Strategy - Late April 2020 14 Views 1 Faqs 49 Visitors 53 Views Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project 53 Views 1 Key Dates 65 Visitors 71 Views Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project 71 Views Page 5 of 7 REFERRER URL Visits www.google.com 288 m.facebook.com 32 www.edinamn.gov 32 www.bing.com 28 nextdoor.com 21 www.edinamorningside.org 16 android-app 13 t.co 8 www.bangthetable.com 8 search.yahoo.com 7 docs.google.com 6 duckduckgo.com 6 l.facebook.com 4 patch.com 4 www.google.com.au 3 Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 01 May 2020 to 20 April 2021 TRAFFIC SOURCES OVERVIEW Page 6 of 7 PROJECT TITLE AWARE INFORMED ENGAGED Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project 1514 700 43 Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 01 May 2020 to 20 April 2021 SELECTED PROJECTS - FULL LIST Page 7 of 7 Summary Report 21 April 2021 - 12 October 2021 Better Together Edina PROJECTS SELECTED: 1 Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project FULL LIST AT THE END OF THE REPORT Highlights TOTAL VISITS 1.8 k MAX VISITORS PER DAY 66 NEW REGISTRATI ONS19 ENGAGED VISITORS 36 INFORMED VISITORS 601 AWARE VISITORS 1 k Visitors Summary Pageviews Visitors Visits New Registrations 1 Jul '21 1 Oct '21 2k 4k 6k Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 21 April 2021 to 12 October 2021 PARTICIPANT SUMMARY ENGAGED INFORMED AWARE 36 ENGAGED PARTICIPANTS 000 003 000 000 000 002 004 000 0031 Registered Unverified Anonymous Contributed on Forums Participated in Surveys Contributed to Newsfeeds Participated in Quick Polls Posted on Guestbooks Contributed to Stories Asked Questions Placed Pins on Places Contributed to Ideas* A single engaged participant can perform multiple actions Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project…36 (3.5%) (%) * Calculated as a percentage of total visits to the Project ENGAGED INFORMED AWARE 601 INFORMED PARTICIPANTS 18 75 402 30 15 0 531 36 Participants Viewed a video Viewed a photo Downloaded a document Visited the Key Dates page Visited an FAQ list Page Visited Instagram Page Visited Multiple Project Pages Contributed to a tool (engaged) * A single informed participant can perform multiple actions Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project…601 (58.6%) (%) * Calculated as a percentage of total visits to the Project ENGAGED INFORMED AWARE 1,025 AWARE PARTICIPANTS 1,025 Participants Visited at least one Page * Aware user could have also performed an Informed or Engaged Action Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project…1,025 * Total list of unique visitors to the project Page 2 of 7 FORUM TOPICS SUMMARY TOP 3 FORUM TOPICS BASED ON CONTRIBUTORS SURVEYS SUMMARY TOP 3 SURVEYS BASED ON CONTRIBUTORS NEWSFEEDS SUMMARY TOP 3 NEWSFEEDS BASED ON VISITORS STORIES SUMMARY TOP 3 STORIES BASED ON CONTRIBUTORS Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 21 April 2021 to 12 October 2021 ENGAGEMENT TOOLS SUMMARY 3 FORUM TOPICS 3 SURVEYS 60 NEWS FEEDS 0 QUICK POLLS 0 GUESTBOOKS 1 STORIES 1 Q&A'S 1 PLACES 3 3 Forum Topics 0 Contributors 0 Contributions December 9, 2020 Virtual Meeting #3 0 Contributors to September 3, 2020 Virtual Meeting #2 0 Contributors to June 3, 2020 Virtual Meeting #1 0 Contributors to 3 Surveys 3 Contributors 3 Submissions Morningside Flooding Poll 3 Contributors to Refined Concept Reaction 0 Contributors to Initial Concepts Reaction 0 Contributors to 60 NewsFeed 185 Visits 143 Visitors Available now - initial design concepts 37 Visitors to Initial Design Open House - August 17th 27 Visitors to Multi-use open space and rink location 19 Visitors to 1 Stories 2 Contributors 2 Submissions Share your story 2 Authors to Page 3 of 7 Q & A SUMMARY TOP 3 Q & A BASED ON CONTRIBUTORS PLACES SUMMARY TOP 3 PLACES BASED ON CONTRIBUTORS IDEAS SUMMARY TOP 3 IDEAS BASED ON CONTRIBUTORS Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 21 April 2021 to 12 October 2021 ENGAGEMENT TOOLS SUMMARY 1 Q&As 4 Contributors 7 Questions Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project 4 Contributors to 1 Places 0 Contributors 0 Pins Morningside Neighborhood 0 Contributors to 3 Ideas 31 Contributors 169 Contributions 30 percent design 30 Contributed to Flood Infrastructure Refined Concept - Reactions and Ideas 3 Contributed to Flood Infrastructure Scenarios Reactions and Ideas 0 Contributed to Page 4 of 7 DOCUMENTS TOP 3 DOCUMENTS BASED ON DOWNLOADS PHOTOS TOP 3 PHOTOS BASED ON VIEWS VIDEOS TOP 3 VIDEOS BASED ON VIEWS FAQS TOP 3 FAQS BASED ON VIEWS KEY DATES TOP 3 KEY DATES BASED ON VIEWS Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 21 April 2021 to 12 October 2021 INFORMATION WIDGET SUMMARY 24 DOCUMENTS 4 PHOTOS 6 VIDEOS 1 FAQS 1 KEY DATES 24 Documents 402 Visitors 811 Downloads Morningside 30%Plan.pdf 384 Downloads Morningside 30%Timeline_LK.pdf 147 Downloads Morningside 30%Imagery.pdf 132 Downloads 4 Photos 75 Visitors 183 Views Aerial photo_1967 76 Views Aerial photo_1971 48 Views County Ditch 17.jpg 36 Views 6 Videos 18 Visitors 26 Views Flood Risk in the Morningside Neighborhood - a closer look 10 Views Virtual Meeting #3 9 Views Agenda: Edina - Flood Risk Reduction Strategy - Late April 2020 4 Views 1 Faqs 15 Visitors 15 Views Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project 15 Views 1 Key Dates 30 Visitors 37 Views Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project 37 Views Page 5 of 7 REFERRER URL Visits www.google.com 332 www.edinamn.gov 32 nextdoor.com 20 www.bing.com 17 android-app 13 duckduckgo.com 11 www.edinamorningside.org 9 m.facebook.com 7 www.google.co.za 4 l.facebook.com 4 statics.teams.cdn.office.net 3 www.google.com.au 3 edinamn.gov 3 startpage.com 2 www.bangthetable.com 2 Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 21 April 2021 to 12 October 2021 TRAFFIC SOURCES OVERVIEW Page 6 of 7 PROJECT TITLE AWARE INFORMED ENGAGED Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project 1025 601 36 Better Together Edina : Summary Report for 21 April 2021 to 12 October 2021 SELECTED PROJECTS - FULL LIST Page 7 of 7 Morningside Flood Infrastructure ProjectProvide your feedback for these concepts at: www.bettertogetheredina.org/morningside30% Concept Design - Weber Park, Weber Pond + Weber WoodsFeet0 20 40 80N8/11/2021Weber PondWeber Park12’ Utility VehicleAccess Path6’ Summer TrailNature Trails, UnpavedExisting Nature TrailOak SavannaRestorationBoardwalkBoardwalkExisting SidewalkAccess into ParkExisting TennisCourtsPreserved Oak KnollPavement reductionand improved accessibilityExisting WarmingHouseReconstructedSoftball FieldReconstructedSoftball FieldDrainage Swale FeatureExisting BasketballCourtExisting Playgroundand Oak TreesPreserved Tree GroveChildren’sPracticeInfi eldLimits of Winter SkatingHockeyRink withPermanentBoardsCentralGreenPark Structurefor Shade + SeatingGolden Years’ MontessoriAvail AcademyGRIMES AVENUE SW 42nd STREETFRANCE AVENUE SAccess into ParkAccess into ParkNature Play AreaNew Plantings whereGrading OccursNew Plantings whereGrading OccursNew Plantings whereGrading OccursDrainage Swale FeatureAdditional Tree Plantingfor ScreeningParking LotImprovementsParking LotImprovements6’ Summer TrailNature Trails, UnpavedPollinator PlantingActivity LawnActivity LawnSeating AreaSeating Area/OverlookBench/Seating332121Nature Paths and Walking LoopsMaintain Informal Dog Park Use Natural Resource/Habitat EnhancementFlood Resiliency and/or Water Quality ImprovementKey features requested during project engagement: Morningside Flood Infrastructure ProjectProvide your feedback for these concepts at: www.bettertogetheredina.org/morningsideProject Timeline and Lynn/Kipling Inundation AreaOriginal Analysis1961Morningside Storm Sewer StudyPart of the Larger System1963City of Minneapolis grants permission for village to connect to storm sewer systemMorningside Rejoins Edina 1966Village of Morningside votes to rejoin City of EdinaCreation of Flood Storage Areas1967Study of Morningside storm sewer system. Design includes pipes and creation of storage areas - Lynn/Kipling inundation area and Weber pond.Updated Analysis2006Weber Park Pond Feasibility StudyPlanning Ahead2016City of Edina purchases Weber Woods. Purchase agreement states: “Weber Woods shall be used solely for public park purposes, including open space, outdoor recreation, and dog park, and similar uses and facilities; stormwater management facilities; and public utilities.”Water Resources Management 2018Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan developedResidents Infl uence Strategy 2019Citizen Task Force is engaged to inform Flood Risk Reduction StrategyCitywide Strategy is Approved2020Flood risk reduction strategy publishedNeighborhood Conversations2020-2021The City engages with the Morningside Neighborhood to develop an initial concept designDetailed Flood Risk Reduction Design Spring 2021City Council decision to move from concept to detailed design and construction planning. Refi ned fl ood risk reduction concepts developed.30% Design Public EngagementSummer 2021Public reviews 30% design conceptsComplete Flood Risk Reduction DesignFall 2021Staff complete 60% and 100% design and construction documentsPrepare for ConstructionWinter 2022City Council will consider authorizing constructionConstruction 2022-2023Street reconstruction and fl ood infrastructure improvementsNFeet0 10 20 30 401971 Aerial Photo1967 Aerial Photo8/11/2021Note: graphic represents public engagement during preliminary engineering between April 2020 and January 2021Preserved TreesLynn/Kipling Inundation AreaNew Tree PlantingsNew Tree PlantingsPreserved TreesNative Plantings for HabitatNative Plantings for HabitatNative Plantings for Habitat2021How Public Input Affected our DesignInclude as design goals;• No increase in risk to any individual property• Balance the risk and benefi t of the project• No private property will be proposed for acquisition• Avoid fl oodwallsInclude as design consideration;• Future climate change• Limit impact at Weber ParkTake advantage of opportunity;• Enhance natural areas where impacts occur• Consider park improvements where impacts occur• Remove or reduce potential for fl ood overfl ow into private property through minor changes in grade• Add inlets in low areas to fully utilize pipeDetailed conversations also led the design team to;• Consider backfl ow and overfl ow on Grimes Avenue• Improve system map and model accuracy in 41st street right-of-way• Consider overfl ow on Crocker Avenue20212021KIPLING AVENUE W 42nd STREETLYNN AVENUE****Engagement Activities in 2020 Morningside Flood Infrastructure ProjectProvide your feedback for these concepts at: www.bettertogetheredina.org/morningside30% Concept Design Proposed Features: Proposed Site Features and Vegetation Types8/11/2021Oak Savanna RestorationOak Savanna RestorationNative Plantings for Pollinator HabitatNative Habitat at ShorelineNative Habitat at ShorelineSimple Native PlantingMowed Edges at Native PlantingsBoardwalk MaterialsBoardwalk MaterialsNative Plantings for HabitatPark Structure for SeatingNature PlayNature PlayNature PlayPark Structure for SeatingPark Structure for SeatingImage from Slidesandsunshine.com - Lafayette Nature Discovery Park, ColoradoImage from FamilyFunTwinCities.com - Lake Owasso County Park, Shoreview, MNImage from WAX Design - Adelaide Zoo, AustrailiaImage from City of Edina - Fred Richards ParkImage from Forever RedwoodsImage from WickcraftImage from Wickcraft Morningside Flood Infrastructure ProjectProvide your feedback for these concepts at: www.bettertogetheredina.org/morningsideNFeet0 10 20 30 40Preserved TreesLynn/Kipling Inundation AreaNew Tree PlantingsNew Tree PlantingsPreserved TreesNative Plantings for HabitatNative Plantings for HabitatNative Plantings for Habitat2021KIPLING AVENUE W 42nd STREETLYNN AVENUEFeet0 20 40 80NRevised 30% Concept Design - Weber Park, Weber Pond + Weber Woods10/12/2021Weber PondWeber Park12’ Utility VehicleAccess PathNature Trails, UnpavedExisting Nature TrailOak SavannaRestorationBoardwalkBoardwalkExisting SidewalkAccess into ParkExisting TennisCourtsPavement reductionand improved accessibilityExisting WarmingHouseExisting BasketballCourtExisting Playgroundand Oak TreesGolden Years’ MontessoriAvail AcademyGRIMES AVENUE SW 42nd STREETFRANCE AVENUE SAccess into ParkAccess into ParkNew Plantings whereGrading OccursNew Plantings whereGrading OccursNew Plantings whereGrading OccursDrainage Swale FeatureParking LotImprovementsParking LotImprovements6’ Summer TrailNature Trails, UnpavedSeating Area/OverlookBench/SeatingExisting TurfExisting Ice RinkReconstructed Ball Fields (Irrigated) Morningside Flood Infrastructure ProjectRevised 30% Design LayoutCity Council MeetingOctober 19, 2021Chad Millner – Engineering Director 2Revised 30% Design 3Revised 30% DesignIce Rink and Open Skate UnchangedCreated Flat Space between FieldsRemoved Outfield FenceCommunications to residentsBudget Impacts EdinaMN.gov4Schedule / Next Steps•Q3 2021 (late) Public comment period ends, 30-60% design work, regulatory permits•Q4 2021; Regulatory permits, final design work•Q1 2022 Award tree clearing contract•Q2 2022 (early) Award grading/park project•Q2 2022 (early) Award neighborhood recon project (includes majority of pipe project)•Q2 2022 (mid) Construction Starts Approve Revised 30% Design LayoutRecommendationEdinaMN.gov5 Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: X.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Community Health Commission, August 9, 2021 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None, information only. INTRODUCTION: Receive minutes of the August 9, 2021 Community Health Commission. ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: Community Health Commission: August 9 2021 This meeting will be held in person and electronically using Webex software. The meeting will be streamed live on the City's YouTube channel, YouTube.com/EdinaTV or you can listen to the meeting via telephone by calling 1-415-655-0001, Access code: 177 576 9269 MINUTES Community Health Commission August 9, 2021 at 6:30 PM City Hall, Community Room I.Call To Order II.Roll Call Present: Julia Selleys, Mary Absolon, Michael Wood, Philip King-Lowe, Tracy Nelson, Andrew Hawkins, Greg Wright, Ellie Mullen Absent: Rob Loesch, Eva DeSimone, Isadora Li III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion by Philip King-Lowe to Approve August 24, 2021 Meeting Agenda. Seconded by Tracy Nelson. Motion Carried. IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes A.July 12, 2021 Meeting Minutes Motion by Philip King-Lowe to Approve July 12, 2021 Meeting Minutes. Seconded by Andrew Hawkins. Motion Carried. V.Community Comment VI.Reports/Recommendations A.Smoke-Free Initiative Update Update moved to September meeting. B.2022 Work Plan Discussion Opioid work plan item: move to action item in 2022. Social Connectedness work plan item: move to action item in 2022. Discussion of 'Age Friendly MN' initiative and City interest. 'Stop the Bleed' initiative? Kits available at AED's locations? ARPA funds? VII.Chair And Member Comments A.Subcommittee Report Out None additional. VIII.Staff Comments IX.Adjournment Motion by Andrew Hawkins to Adjourn. Seconded by Mary Absolon. Motion Carried. Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: X.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Perry Vetter, Parks & Recreation Director Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Parks & Recreation Commission September 14, 2021 CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None, information only. INTRODUCTION: Receive the minutes from the Sept. 14, 2021 Parks & Recreation Commission meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: Parks & Recreation Commission Sept. 14, 2021 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 10/12/2021 Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Edina Parks & Recreation Commission Braemar Golf Course September 14, 2021 7 p.m. I. Call to Order Chair Ites called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Commissioners Doscotch, Good, Ites, McAwley, Miller, Strother and Student Commissioner Jah Commissioner Nelson arrived at 7:07 p.m. and Student Commissioner Presthus arrived at 7:23 p.m. Absent: Commissioners Haas and Willette Staff present: Staff Liaison Perry Vetter, Assistant Director Parks & Natural Resources Tom Swenson, Assistant Director Recreation & Facilities Tracy Petersen, Braemar Arena General Manager Chad Eischens, Braemar Golf Course General Manager Joe Abood, and Administrative Coordinator Janet Canton III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Motion made by Good to approve the meeting agenda. Motion seconded by Miller. Motion carried. IV. Approval of Meeting Minutes Motion made by McAwley to approve the July 13, 2021minutes. Motion seconded by Strother. Motion carried. V. Special Recognitions and Presentations A. Welcome Student Commissioners Staff Liaison Vetter introduced the newly appointed student Parks & Recreation Commissioners Urva Jha and Samuel Presthus. Commissioners welcomed the new student members to the commission. B. Welcome Casey Hagert, Recreation Supervisor Assistant Director Petersen introduced Casey Hagert the new Recreation Supervisor to the commission. Recreation Supervisor Hagert replaces Tiffany Bushland who was selected as the Centennial Lakes Park General Manager. Commissioners welcomed Recreation Supervisor Hagert. VI. Community Comment None VII. Reports/Recommendations Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 10/12/2021 A. Special Project Request: Expansion of Braemar Ice Arena Staff Liaison Vetter gave an introduction of the special project request from the community to expand Braemar Arena. Staff Liaison Vetter indicated that this request is separate from the Braemar Master Plan and Facility Improvements requested as part of the Local Option Sales Tax proposal for 2022. That proposal has completed a review by the state legislature and was included in the tax bill signed by the governor. The next step is it will be placed on the ballot for Edina residents in 2022. Staff Liaison Vetter explained that this request is part of a series of discussions with community and hockey members on ways the city could improve the short-term condition of Braemar Arena and focus on developing a longer-term vision for the arena. Those discussions slowed due to the Covid-19 pandemic response. This summer, at the request of State Senator Franzen, a request for state bonding was submitted to expand Braemar Arena. The Edina City Council adopted a resolution of support for the state bonding and asked that the project be introduced to the Parks & Recreation Commission. Staff Liaison Vetter outlined the request as adding a fourth sheet of indoor ice by removing the south arena and constructing two new sheets in that location, creating structured parking including a safer drop off location and expanding the common area lobby for the facility. Staff Liaison Vetter indicated that a study would be completed on the viability of the project, including: Operational and capital expense implications Financial obligations Land use planning and other expansion implications Facility design, amenities and building components Peter Fitzgerald, Edina resident, addressed the commission and outlined his involvement in the community as participant, resident, coach, and Edina supporter. He discussed his peers all want to see Braemar Arena reflect the expectations of the community and both reinvestment and expansion are desired. He highlighted a community wide shortage of ice time for youth, both girls and boys programming. The initial planning documents provided to determine the feasibility of expansion were provided at no cost to the city by a community volunteer that has architectural expertise and experience with ice arenas. The commissioners asked questions of Staff Liaison Vetter, General Manager Eischens, and Mr. Fitzgerald. Commissioners indicated the largest challenges to the project was to be clear and precise communication about the merits and financial aspects of the project, timelines and potential disruptions. Commissioners were also concerned that a study of the project might delay other work that has been an existing priority. Commissioners also agreed that the proposed plan had valuable merits and should be studied further. Staff Liaison Vetter indicated that staff would provide a more detailed process for the request to follow and provide updates on those next steps. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 10/12/2021 Commissioner Nelson left the meeting at 8:38 p.m. B. 2021 Work Plan Updates Updates were given on the following initiatives. Initiative #1 – Review and comment on proposed plan to identify barriers for participation and reach communities of color through different modes and feedback. Staff Liaison Vetter indicated he would resend the most recent proposal to the work group for review. Commissioners agreed to review and provide comments back to staff on the draft plan to identify barriers. Initiative #2 – Create presentation to share information about Parks & Recreation facilities, services, and systems with up to six community groups. Staff is waiting to hear on what the allotted time for a Town Talk series might be, either one or multiple sessions. That would dictate the amount of content the presentation would be able to cover. Initiative #3 – Report and provide recommendations on alternative funding sources for park related improvements including parks, facilities, and enterprise upgrades. The work group has reviewed a draft narrative for the alternate funding sources. Initiative #4 Study and report on options to categorize underutilized park amenities/areas and identify park amenity needs. The work group will provide direction on next steps on how to best make this process valuable to the commission and staff for the future. Initiative #5 – Study and report evaluating options for determining benchmarks (park amenities, operations, service areas) the commission started studying in 2020. Staff will provide the work group the results of the cost recovery calculations from the City’s annual financial report. C. 2022 Work Plan Development Discussion Staff Liaison Vetter went over the draft of the 2022 Work Plan calendar. He noted the draft list of initiatives the commission had generated was included in the packet for consideration. At the conclusion of the discussion a motion on a draft plan would be appropriate for presentation to the City Council by Chair Ites at the Oct. 5, 2021, work session. Commissioners discussed the draft initiatives that would be worked on by the commission and which items staff could place on future agendas for updates and presentations. Commissioners determined to move forward with four draft initiative A, combining B and H, combining E and G, II. In summary, the initiatives to be proposed are: Proposed 2022 Initiative #1: Present information about Parks and Recreation facilities, services, and systems with up to six community groups. (Carryover from 2021 work plan) Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 10/12/2021 Proposed 2022 Initiative #2: Recommend funding sources for park related improvements including parks, facilities, and enterprise upgrades, including a philanthropic wish list and donation process. (Carryover from 2021 work plan and additional topics) Proposed 2022 Initiative #3: Review city playground assets with the intent of prioritizing opportunities and improvements, focusing on accessibility, at each location. Proposed 2022 Initiative #4: Review and propose an expanded volunteer assistance program to connect volunteers to park initiatives. Motion made by Strother to approve the proposed 2022 Parks & Recreation Commission work plan. Motion seconded by McAwley. Motion carried. VIII. Chair and Member Comments IX. Staff Comments Staff Liaison Vetter updated the commission on the following items: List of informational items provided as an update Monday, Oct. 4 is the Yancy Park dedication. X. Adjournment Motion made by Miller to adjourn the Sept. 14, 2021 meeting at 9:36 p.m. Motion seconded by Good. Motion carried. Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: XIII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Lisa A. Schaefer, Assistant City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Budget Work Plan and Race & Equity Work Plan Updates Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Attached are updates through September/October 2021 in the 2020-2021 Budget Work Plan and Race & Equity Work Plan. ATTACHMENTS: Description 2020-2021 Budget Work Plan Q3 Updates R&E Work Plan Q3 Updates PUBLISHED OCT. 19, 2021 Page 1 of 10 2020 – 2021 Budget Work Plan Update DEFINITIONS Budget Goal Describes the broad outcomes that must be achieved through the budget. Budget Objective Defines the measurable results that need to be achieved to meet the goals Strategy/Action Details the specific actions to be taken this budget to meet the objectives. Goal 1: Maintain Physical Assets & Infrastructure It is crucial to maintain City infrastructure including streets, facilities, buildings, equipment and public spaces. Deferred maintenance can lead to costly unplanned repairs and replacements with decisions based on short-term implementation costs, vs. long- term maintenance costs. Properly maintained facilities, streets, water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems provide reliable and efficient operations while lessening the City’s carbon footprint. ONGOING OBJECTIVES: Incorporate financial, societal and environmental costs into decision-making processes. Incorporate lifecycle and maintenance costs and climate adaptation design practices to allow more informed decision making. Provide funding to maintain and replace City facilities, assets and equipment in a manner that avoids deferred maintenance, prevents emergency repair and replaces assets at the most cost- effective time. Manage the City’s facilities, operations, equipment and capital investments in a manner that increases energy efficiency, reduces the City’s carbon footprint and GHG emissions and meets sustainability goals. Design and build for resiliency in the infrastructure that reduces flooded structures, improves water quality (drinking and surface) and increases filtered drinking water production. 2020-2021 BUDGET OBJECTIVES As debt levies expire, increase the CIP Levy to establish reliable funding for ongoing building maintenance, replacement and capital improvements. Capture the Southdale TIF tax capacity for 2022 CIP. Reduce the City operations’ total electricity GHG emissions by 5 percent, 893,000 kWh each year, through implementation of energy management plans, ongoing facility maintenance, capital improvements and operational behavior change. Implement Green Fleet Policy recommendations to meet goal of 30 percent emission reduction mpg and gas usage by 2025. Improve security and safety in City facilities for public and staff. PUBLISHED OCT. 19, 2021 Page 2 of 10 2020 – 2021 Budget Work Plan Update 2020-2021 Strategy/Action Dept Lead Target 1 Approve architectural option and complete construction of Water Plant #5. Engineering Q4 2021 ON HOLD 10/14/21 Project moved to 2026 in CIP and looking for potential opportunities to partner with a developer. 2 Create a green building policy for City facilities incorporating sustainability principles into evaluation, design and construction of City capital projects. (Connected with project 3-2). Engineering Q4 2021 IN PROGRESS 09/20/2021 Internal and external working groups are working on draft policy for both internal and external buildings. Review by ELT in September and City Council Work Session October. 3 Determine interim park and recreational uses of Fred Richards Park. Update cost plan estimate prior to CIP process. Parks & Rec Q2 2020 COMPLETE Master plan cost estimates updated for LOST proposal, uses identified and current implementation for art center programming use. 4 Identify funding source and timeline for implementation for Braemar Park Master Plan by Q3 2020. Prioritize master plan components for future implementation. Ensure that master plan costing is updated prior to CIP process. Parks & Rec Q3 2020 COMPLETE Master plan cost estimates included for LOST proposal and CIP review. LOST request was included in the 2021Omnibus Tax Bill. City to conduct a referendum in November 2022 to determine if a local option sales tax is supported by the community. 5 Consider options for using alternative funding methods for park improvements and determine next steps. Finance Q4 2022 IN PROGRESS 09/20/2021 Move to 2022 workplan. LOST request was included in the 2021 Omnibus Tax Bill. City to conduct a referendum in November 2022 to determine if a local option sales tax is supported by the community. 6 Develop a master plan for addressing City Hall deferred maintenance, energy efficiency, security and service needs in a cost-effective manner. Engineering (Facilities) Q3 2021 IN PROGRESS 09/20/2021 Security improvements completed, City Hall Master Plan in CIP for 2021 suggest delaying this to 2022 after staffing model post-COVID are implemented. Energy Management Plan complete. Energy efficiency projects in design phase – LED lighting and controls. 7 Implement decision (to be made in 2019) regarding street assessment financing and transition plan if applicable. If local option sales tax is selected, seek State legislative approval to request that voters approve a local option sales tax for regional park improvements and MSA street improvements. Finance Q2 2020 State approval Q4 2021 Referen- dum COMPLETE 09/20/2021 Task Force completed work March 2021. Assessment Policy Revising in April 2021 by removing retaining walls and sub-cuts from assessments. Council Work Session completed on June 1 with guidance for a July 21 policy/funding change. Council approved change to Assessment Policy on July 21. PUBLISHED OCT. 19, 2021 Page 3 of 10 2020 – 2021 Budget Work Plan Update 8 Approve a City wide water quality strategy for Lake Cornelia. Engineering Q4 2021 IN PROGRESS 09/20/2021 Kick-off scheduled for Q4 2021. Approval of strategy to occur in 2022. 9 Upgrade the communication equipment (SCADA) that monitors and ensures delivery of safe potable water and improve our ability to have a reliable storm and sanitary sewer system. Public Works Q4 2020 IN PROGRESS 10/08/2021 Contractor has begun work and is making good progress. Work still anticipated to be complete in Q2 2022. 10 Develop and begin implementation of the street lighting system and maintenance plan that balances sustainability, public safety, and quality of life goals, including increasing energy efficiency, ensuring safely lit community, and minimizing light pollution. Engineering Q4 2021 IN PROGRESS 09/20/2021 2020 No work occurred due to budget adjustments made in response to COVID-19 Pandemic. In 2021, new lights being installed on 69th Street, east of York. Lighting plans being developed near Edenborough. Street light system is owned and operated between City and Xcel Energy. Any Xcel light greater than 25 years old will not be maintained by them. City is underfunded to address the potential of an additional 315 lights from Xcel. 11 Prepare for possible conversion of Centennial Lakes from Enterprise fund to General fund in 2022-23 budget cycle. Finance Q2 2021 ON HOLD 09/20/2021 Discussed at July 2021 Council work session and decided against pursuing the fund conversion in the 22-23 budget. Parks & Rec is conducting a detailed review of expenses and revenues, and evaluating different funding options with the Parks & Rec Commission. PUBLISHED OCT. 19, 2021 Page 4 of 10 2020 – 2021 Budget Work Plan Update Goal 2: Maintain Service Levels that Best Meet the Needs of the Community The City delivers a variety of services, including police and fire response, water and sewer, snow plowing and building inspections, that are essential for the safety and wellbeing of those who live, work or visit Edina. In addition, amenities and services including recreation facilities, parks and programs contribute to the overall quality of life within the community. To deliver reliable service, the City needs to recruit and retain a strong workforce that has the resources and technology needed to effectively and efficiently perform their work. ONGOING OBJECTIVES Comply with legal and safety standards. Maintain adequate response times. Provide high-quality services in an efficient manner that demonstrates respect for the public. Promote an engaging and respectful work culture that values employee quality of life and work/life balance. Provide competitive employee compensation and benefits to attract and retain a skilled and high- performing workforce. Provide staffing, tools, equipment, resources and training to meet expectations for service delivery. Utilize effective technology to easily maintain and locate data for the public, reduce risk and provide better data for informed decision-making by elected officials and staff. Ensure that limited resources (money, equipment and time) are deployed in an equitable and sustainable manner. 2020-2021 BUDGET OBJECTIVES Increase integration of disparate City data systems, (e.g., Financial, Human Resources and Geographic Information Systems) for better decision-making and easier access. Maintain adequate work-life balance for employees with an increased focus on employee quality of life, stress management, physical and mental well-being. Provide adjustments to employee compensation to maintain position with market. Provide benefit increases to and design changes to maintain affordability. 2020-2021 Strategy/Action Dept Lead Target PUBLISHED OCT. 19, 2021 Page 5 of 10 2020 – 2021 Budget Work Plan Update 1 Implement Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System, including: Project hierarchy and metrics (Q4 2020) “Go-live” new finance and HR software (Q1 2021) Begin implementation of UB software (Q1 2021) Begin implementation of additional HR module, Advanced Scheduling (Q4 2021 or Q1 2022) “Go-live” new UB system (Q3 2021) Finance See Strategy/ Action IN PROGRESS 09/20/21 Finance and HR software went live Jan 2021. Additional HR module implementation underway with expected completion May 2022. UB module implementation has been delayed due to consultant turnover, but will re-start in January 2022. 2 Determine long-term plan for future of Art Center, including: Program evaluation of community service needs for the Art Center. Ensure critical repairs are made to Art Center to properly continue existing operations in current building for at least 10 years. Conduct feasibility and infrastructure analysis on existing Art Center building prior to the CIP process. (Q2 2020) Conduct alternative site analysis and business plan modeling for relocation of the Art Center operations. (Q2 2021) Parks & Rec See Strategy/ Action IN PROGRESS 10/11/2021 Completed infrastructure analysis and reviewing alternate site analysis locations. Reviewed business options with City Council at annual retreat. Reviewing a pottery forward program and location study with members of the Arts & Culture Commission providing the community perspective to the process. Other aspects of arts programming will continue to be decentralized at other city facilities. 3 Implement rental housing license and inspection program. Health Q1 2020 COMPLETE Rental inspections have resumed in single-family and multi-family rentals. 4 Implement Police-Worn Body Cameras. (Q4 2020) Police Q4 2020 COMPLETE Complete. Implementation completed in mid-December. Body-worn cameras fully deployed and operational. 5 Replace Public Safety Computer-aided Dispatch (CAD) and Record Management System (RMS) Police Q4 2021 See detail IN PROGRESS 10/12/2021 Final contract negotiations underway with Tyler Technologies, goal is to execute by end of the year. Working with Richfield on adding additional hosted software services to their current dispatch services agreement with us. Approximately 15-18 months from contract signing to go-live (mid 2023). Capital funds to be spent over 2021-2023. 6 Decision, finance method and plan for relocating OR expanding Fire Station 2 in order to accommodate 24-hour operations with one fire apparatus, two ambulances and support vehicle. Fire Q4 2020 PUBLISHED OCT. 19, 2021 Page 6 of 10 2020 – 2021 Budget Work Plan Update IN PROGRESS 10/12/2021 Using response time maps of fire and medical calls, staff has identified several potential sites to build a new Station #2. Each site has been evaluated and prioritized based on its location. Three sites are being studied further to better understand the acquisition and construction costs. A preferred location is expected to be identified by Q4 2021. The staff recommendation will be brought to the City Council for consideration. 7 Determine finance method and plan for Fire Station 3 in the Northeast Quadrant of the City. This station would be of such size to accommodate 24-hour operations with one fire engine, ambulance and support vehicle. Fire Q4 2020 IN PROGRESS 10/12/2021 Propose and acquire site after Station #2 site is determined, utilizing response models to provide efficient emergency response to all residents. 8 Conduct first presidential primary under new state legislation. Administration Q1 2020 COMPLETE Complete. Voter turnout was 43 percent (6 percent for absentee voting). Turnout was 10 percent lower than estimated by Hennepin County and may have been impacted by the requirement for voters to select a party ballot. Staff is expecting $56,500 in reimbursements from the State. 9 Develop long-term plan for elections absentee voting and storage. Administration Q1 2020 COMPLETE Complete. 10/13/2021 Absentee voting and storage will remain at City Hall and alternative locations will be used for other storage needs. PUBLISHED OCT. 19, 2021 Page 7 of 10 2020 – 2021 Budget Work Plan Update Goal 3: Plan for Connected & Sustainable Development Redevelopment and renewal of commercial and residential real estate is essential to the vibrancy of the community. Redevelopment will play an integral part of providing an inclusive, high quality of life that the Edina community expects. It is important to ensure plans and policies are relevant today and flexible for tomorrow. Incorporating sustainability principles and standards during redevelopment with the goal of reducing the community’s carbon footprint will be critical to human health and safety. Creating sustainable redevelopment requires forward thinking and preparing for the future. ONGOING OBJECTIVES Determine, track and meet sustainability goals for metrics such as energy, transportation, water and waste. Connect neighborhoods, businesses and open spaces. Support the continued high quality of life offered to residents and those who work in Edina. Promote affordable lifecycle housing. Demonstrate resiliency to changing climate and future community needs. 2020-2021 BUDGET OBJECTIVES Continue installation of sidewalks and shared-use paths (e.g., Twin Loops implementation). Launch residential curbside organics and recycling (define numbers and goals). Create affordable/workforce housing (1,220 units by 2030). 2020-2021 Strategy/Action Dept Lead Target 1 Continue development and implement a strategy to create affordable housing units with revenue from the Affordable Housing Policy and from Southdale II TIF District special authority. Community Development Q4 2021 IN PROGRESS 10/7/2021 Affordable Housing Trust Fund The Homes Within Reach has been approved. Houses are bring sought for purchase. It is likely that staff will seek additional funding for Homes Within Reach to acquire additional homes. Southdale II Developer for 4040 W. 70th is still securing funds. On behalf of the Edina Housing Foundation, staff reached out to a broker to secure an additional potential development site. 2 Create and implement a green building policy to incent sustainable building and operational practices for new development and redevelopment. (Connected with 1-2) Engineering Q3 2021 PUBLISHED OCT. 19, 2021 Page 8 of 10 2020 – 2021 Budget Work Plan Update IN PROGRESS 09/20/2021 Internal and external working groups are working on draft policy for both internal and external buildings. Review by ELT in September; City Council Work Session in October. 3 Develop waste reduction goals and implementation plan for residential organics recycling for April 2020 launch. Health Q2 2020 COMPLETE Program began in June, 2020. There are 100 tons of organics per month diverted from the waste stream. And a 30 percent participation rate in the organics recycling program. 4 Implement Energy Benchmarking ordinance. Engineering Q4 2021 IN PROGRESS 09/20/2021 Next building size requirement of ordinance is being implemented. Mailing and trainings are complete. Deadline for submission was extended from June 1 to July 1. Total buildings required to submit data is approximately 400. Looking at possible changes to the ordinance related to water data, energy assessments, and fines for Q4 2021. 5 Decide on future of redevelopment of the former Public Works site in the Grandview area by Q2 2021. Community Development Q2 2021 IN PROGRESS 10/7/2021 Additional information is being collected regarding the type of activity desired for the north portion of the site. Options will be presented in fall 2021. If well received, a revised site concept will be prepared for sketch plan review by Planning Commission and City Council. Contracts have been awarded for several public improvements and the work has begun. Additional design is being explored for the pedestrian bridge. A change order will necessary to change the aesthetics of the bridge. 6 Develop a Climate Action Plan for the City. Engineering Q4 2021 IN PROGRESS 09/20/2021 Draft CAP out for review and comment. Approval of CAP scheduled for December 2021 with City Council. 7 Complete study of expanding public parking at 44th and France and explore a strategy to create district parking in the 44th and France Area per the 44th and France Small Area Plan, including parameters that balance current transportation needs and sustainability goals. Community Development/ Finance Q4 2021 IN PROGRESS 10/7/2021 New funding options have been identified. Another property owner meeting is scheduled for October 2021. 8 Develop Travel Demand Management Policy. Engineering Q4 2020 COMPLETE Approved by Council April 2021. 9 Prepare a District Plan for the Cahill Industrial Park by Q4 2022. Community Development Q4 2022 IN PROGRESS 10/7/2021 Moved to 2021-22. Project planning has begun. A kick- off meeting is scheduled for Nov. 15, 2021. 10 Work with Edina School District to develop and implement Safe Routes to Schools program. Engineering Q1 2020 ON HOLD Indefinitely on hold with COVID-19 Pandemic and as School District group focused on busing instead until further notice. MnDOT grant program study complete at Cornelia, Highlands and Creek Valley Elementary Schools. PUBLISHED OCT. 19, 2021 Page 9 of 10 2020 – 2021 Budget Work Plan Update Goal 4: Foster Inclusive and Engaged Community It is important that the City helps to foster a community that is welcoming and inclusive to all who live, work and spend time in Edina. The City wants to ensure that it works for all of the community. Efforts to engage the community will utilize multiple platforms, be informative, transparent, responsive and involve volunteers and City Commissions. ONGOING OBJECTIVES Ensure City policies and practices do not have disparate impacts based on race, color, national origin, creed, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender expression, familial status or disability. Conduct clear and meaningful community engagement where: o The decision to be made and decision-making process is clearly defined. o Individuals understand how and when they can participate. o The City communicates what feedback is used and why. o Inclusive engagement methods provide a variety of ways for the public to participate in the decision-making process and ensure all voices are heard. o Residents are satisfied with the process, even if they disagree with the outcome. 2020-2021 BUDGET OBJECTIVES Increase participation in Better Together Edina online engagement website. Implement racial equity measures to provide accountability of work. Strengthen leadership and support for city-wide racial equity work. Better leverage Boards and Commissions. Reduce barriers to public participation. Increase diversity of boards, commissions, task forces and staff. 2020-2021 Strategy/Action Dept Lead Target 1 Continue implementation of Racial Equity Implementation Plan and provide quarterly reports to City Council and HRRC. Administration Q4 2020 IN PROGRESS 10/14/21. Race & Equity Work Plan progress will be provided to HRRC quarterly, which aligns with timeline to City Council. 2 Continue to evaluate and further refine community engagement standards and protocols based on IAP2 model. Administration Q4 2020 COMPLETE Complete. Promo video and website updates done for Better Together Edina. Will continue to refine. 3 Develop measurable city-wide/department racial equity goals and incorporate racial equity tools and resources into decision-making processes. Administration Q1 2021 PUBLISHED OCT. 19, 2021 Page 10 of 10 2020 – 2021 Budget Work Plan Update IN PROGRESS 10/11/21 Staff members have created work plan tools and provided tools to ELT for 2021 work plan development. 4 Strengthen leadership and support for city-wide racial equity work, including providing additional training, tools and resources to embed an equity framework to City processes, services and decisions. This strategy will build upon all employee and leadership training conducted in 2018-2019. Develop and implement racial equity leadership training, resources and support for City Council. (Q1 2020). Conduct advanced racial equity training for staff leadership and foundational training for all employees. (Q2 2020). Incorporate employee selected racial equity competency in annual performance review. Administration Q3 2020 IN PROGRESS 10/14/21 Racial equity training for full-time staff rolled out February 2021, at this time 161 full-time employees have completed the training. Racial equity goals are included in staff quarterly check-in reviews. Still need to work with HR to review ERP system capabilities to incorporate competencies in performance reviews going forward. 5 Develop and implement a plan to increase diversity of boards and commissions members. Administration Q3 2020 IN PROGRESS 10/11/21 Presented 2022 process enhancements to Board & Commission recruitment, outreach, application and interview process to Council. Interview process was determined by Council. Plan will be implemented in 2022. Racial Equity Work Plan GOAL:TARGET STATUS PROGRESS Hire a full-time Race and Equity coordinator, whose accountabilities include oversight of the Racial Equity Implementation Plan (work plan), monitoring, assessing and evaluating progress toward goals.2019 - Q1 Complete Race and Equity Coordinator started on March 18, 2019. Racial Equity goals and metrics from the Racial Equity Implementation Plan will be incorporated into department work plans and employee performance reviews.2019 - Q1 Ongoing/ Continuation in 2020 Staff quarterly check-in forms have race and equity components embedded. City-wide race and equity goals have been established for 2021 such as full-time employees attending race and equity training being offered in 2021. The racial equity advancement team (REAT) will work identify specific opportunities to increase racial and cultural diversity on work teams.2019 - Q2 Complete/ Ongoing REAT continues to meet virtually. The Engagement Group worked with community members to plan Yancey Park dedication event. Work Plan Group will help provide support in 2022 work plan development. Training Group has developed supplemental training being offered in late October 2021.0 Report results of the Quality of Life Survey disaggregated by race/ethnicity as part of the Annual Racial Equity Advancement Report.2019 - Q2 Not Complete Survey results presented in June 2019. Race/ethnicity could not be disaggregated for all questions because the number of non-white survey respondents was small. However, 2021 Quality of Life Survey (QLS) has been completed and larger sample number of surveys sent to community. 2021 QLS results has been reported to City Council. Evaluate feasibility and advisability of increasing the amount of police-community data collected by the City.2019 - Q2 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 Police Department submitted cost proposal and amendment contract to provide dispatch services and emergency communications to the City of Richfield, which included plan to replace CAD/RMS system. The new system impacts services agreement, which needed to be approved first before purchase of system. Baselines and process will also be reviewed to collect data. Provide Racial Equity Training to all City staff.2019 - Q2 Complete Leadership training on 12/2018 and IQS Racial Equity training for full-time city employees in 1/2019. City Council and Executive Leadership went through GROW Framework training in Q1-2020. As of 10/2021, 161 full-time employees have completed GROW Feamework as part of Citywide training. Evaluate quality of life survey questions to elicit relevant information about all city services around Race and Equity.2019 - Q3 Complete Quality of Life Survey results for 2019 & 2021 have been completed and results have been presented to City Council and community. Maintain a database on the number and location of affordable housing in Edina.2019 - Q4 Complete/ Ongoing Database of mult-housing units have been created and available on City of Edina's Afforable Housing page. Upon reviewing Police Department Policy Manual and removing non-public information, the manual will be placed on the City's website.2019 - Q4 Complete/ Continuation in 2020 All police department manual policies have been reviewed and posted on the City website, except policies that have tactical information. Investigate available data to desegregate maps of resident population by race and how this data can be linked to allocating funds through City budgeting processes (CIP, PACS, Operating)2019 - Q4 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 PACS Prioritization will be presented Transportation Commission feedback then presented to City Council for review. Establish a Racial Equity Advancement Annual Report and presentation for the Human Rights and Relations Commission and City Council. The annual report to the City Council will be presented at the second Council meeting in January starting in January of 2020. 2020 - Q1 Complete/ Ongoing Race & Equity Annual Report presentation has been provided to City Council and Human Rights and Relations Commissions by Race and Equity Coordinator, along with a quarterly report status report in council packets. Annual presentations are generally provided in Q2. GOAL:TARGET STATUS PROGRESS Deliver staff training on scholarship fund availability to ensure residents are provided the opportunity to apply for financial assistance.2019 - Q1 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 Parks and Recreation has implemented new registration system, CivicRec. The new system has more opportunties to manage scholarship, once it is developed by staff. Review the existing Come Home 2 Edina program and advertisement strategy to families of color.2019 - Q3 Complete Brochures have been translated into Spanish; however, more intentional is being focused on alternative ways to market to families of color such as creating relationships with organizations. Demographic information continues to be collected through application process. ACCOUNTABILITY & DATA COLLECTION CITY FACILITIES & SERVICES Updated 10.13.2021 Page 1 of 4 Racial Equity Work Plan GOAL:TARGET STATUS PROGRESS Ensure City facility artwork and décor reflects diversity of race and culture.2019 - Q4 Complete/ Continued into 2020 Arts & Décor Rurbic was approved by City Council on August 18, 2020. Arts & Culture Commission is using the rubric for Public Art process. Review and identify if barriers to utilization of Park and Recreation programs exist and elicit solutions from community members and users.2019 - Q4 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 This work plan has been moved to 2021 work plan. City staff members will creates a plan to receive feedback from community members on barriers to program utilizations. PARC and HRRC will review and comment in 2021 Commission work plans by end of year. Name a public facility in the Grandview area after BC and Ellen Yancey. Human Rights and Relations Commission will review and comment. Parks and Recreation Commission will review and recommend.2019 - Q4 Complete/ Contined into 2020 On October 7, 2020 the Edina City Council unanimously renamed Garden Park as Yancey Park and directed staff to plan for the renaming. Discriminatory covenant on City-owned facility denounced in June 2021 and Yancey Park Dedication event took place on October 4, 2021. Ensure facilities have wayfinding signage and printed materials in multiple languages.2019 - Q4 Ongoing/ Continuation in 2020 Centennial Lakes Parks being identified as focus to inventory of signs, potential costs and resources needed; however, project will be moved to 2022. As City facilities maps are updated, there is a focus on inserting wayfinding icons for better viewing experience. Employees will be trained on how to support first-time guests of City facilities.2020 - Q4 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 No P&R employee training has been offered in 2021. in Q4-2021, P&R staff plans to have City facility leadership review the employee handbook/code of conduct to get assessment of each facility training process. GOAL:TARGET STATUS PROGRESS Add Metro transit link to facility website(s).2018 - Q4 Complete Links for Metro Transit has been added to facility website. Staff will create a standing City communications “Feedback Group" of volunteer residents that can be called upon via meeting, email, or as needed for both strategic and quick feedback to staff.2018 - Q4 Complete/ Ongoing Group has been assembled. First meeting in January 2019 and group will have ongoing meetings to receive feedback. Communications Feedback Group continues to meet. The new City Community Engagement employee will ensure there is a robust community engagement approach, informed by ongoing relationship with residents, residents of color and residents for whom English is a second language. 2019 - Q1 Complete/ Ongoing Community Engagement Coordinator continues to adapt engagement approach while looking at potential opportunity gaps to increase diversity. Optional demogaphic questions have been updated to align with Parks and Recreation registration system. The City will include questions on racial equity work in the 2019 Quality of Life Survey.2019 - Q1 Complete Survey included racial and self indicators to provide baseline information to help support racial equity work. 2021 Quality of Life Survey results have been presented to City Council and community. Survey responses in 2021 show 68% of survey participants indicate that it is essential and/or very important local government focuses on creating a diverse and inclusive city. In 2017 and 2019, 56% of survey participants indicate that it is essential and/or very important local government focuses on creating a diverse and inclusive city. Develop protocol and procedures to apply a race and equity perspective to communications content.2019 - Q2 Complete/ Continuous in 2020 The communications protocol document was reviewed by HRRC and REAT and will updated as needed. Evaluate and improve the police department's current Community Outreach Programs. Consider opportunities for community members to engage with the department.2019 - Q2 Ongoing Police Department currently reviewing community engagement process. Night to Unite 2021 was first event held since start of COVID-19 in March 2020. Additional review of current communications and marketing of community engagement events is occuring. During Community Outreach Program Evaluation, the police department will develop communication strategies to publicize and promote the department through communication methods including social media. 2019 - Q2 Ongoing Police Department currently reviewing community engagement process. Night to Unite 2021 was first event held since start of COVID-19 in March 2020. Additional review of current communications and marketing of community engagement events is occuring. Develop a strategic approach to the city's community engagement efforts. Task a city employee with overseeing/directing community engagement work.2019 - Q4 Complete/ Ongoing The Community Engagement Manager continues to engage community through different modes such as Better Together Edina, Neighborhood Association Recognition, public participation efforts, and increasing diversity in Boards and Commissions. COMMUNITY ENGAGMENT & COMMUNICATIONS CITY FACILITIES & SERVICES Updated 10.13.2021 Page 2 of 4 Racial Equity Work Plan GOAL:TARGET STATUS PROGRESS The City will develop plain language policy and an LEP (Limited English Proficiency) policy for City communications.2019 - Q4 Complete/ Continued into 2020 Plain Language Policy and Limited English Proficiency policy has been approved. Frontline staff members have been provided training and LanguageLine phone number cards. Training for staff members will be provided as needed. Use insights gained from new partnerships and relationships with community, the City will find new ways to market and communicate to POC.2019 - Q4 Complete/ Ongoing Communications is continuing relationships with media outlets who focus on people of color and has been begun to distribute City of Edina press releases through modes such as text updates from the City and focus of accessibilty of communications in multiple languagses. Develop alternate ways to register for programs or use of City facilities. The city will develop new ways to reach and welcome new and underserved populations into the community.2019 - Q4 Ongoing/ Continuous Google Translate option on website and Connect Card being promoted on Activity Directory. City partnering with Edina Community Education on "New to Edina" event in 2021. The Police Department will conduct a review of the Crime Report policy for posting individual names on the department website.2019 - Q4 Complete Weekly Crime Reports, as of October 7, 2019, names of individuals have been removed. The report contains age and gender of individuals and location of report. Archive timeframe changed from 6 months to 2 months. Discussion to monitor if there are changes in staff workflow based on change as well potential equity challenges that arise in the future. GOAL:TARGET STATUS PROGRESS Make a language edit to the Edina Affordable Housing Policy: The City recognizes the need to provide affordable housing in order to create and maintain a diverse population and to provide housing for those who live or work in the City. 2018 - Q4 Complete/ Ongoing Approved by Council October 2018. Policy is reviewed yearly. Last reviewed in March 2021. Develop goals and policies to increase the number of affordable housing units and rental until where housing assistance vouchers (ex. Section 8) can be used.2018 - Q4 Complete/ Ongoing Every owner/developer that has affordable housing units and rentals in Edina receives an affordable housing guide that includes non-discriminatory language. Request the Edina Housing Foundation to review the affordable housing policy to specifically consider removing the option for developers to opt-out of building affordable units.2019 - Q2 Complete Reviewed Affordable Housing Policy with Edina Housing Foundation to remove opt-out option. Decision to not remove opt-out policy because funds from Affordable Housing Trust Fund could be used to further program. Policy is reviewed yearly. Develop City-wide procedure and policy for responding to complaints that are perceived by staff as possibly racially motivated. Collect data on complaints that seem discriminatory in nature, including who makes the complaints and about whom. Apply this policy to complaints against those belonging to other protected groups. 2019 - Q2 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 Bias and Discrimination Form has been added to City website for community members to complete. Researching compliant intake process for departments that receive compliants from community members. Review affordable housing policy annually to address current conditions and needs. Ensure race and equity policy perspective is used at each review period.2019 - Q4 Complete/ Ongoing Affordable Housing Policy reviewed and presented to Council in Q1-2021. Policy is reviewed annually. Review Edina zoning regulations through a racial equity lens to change or remove language that may contribute to racial disparities. Develop language with the intention of reducing inequities in the City's zoning regulations. 2019 - Q4 Ongoing/ Continuation in 2020 Community Development will scaffold additional zoning regulations through a race and equity lens each year. This is will be an ongoing work plan item as zoning ordinances are reviewed individually. Starting to collect data on impact of garage and basement ordinances changes. Review process on using affordable housing funds received from the opt-out option and develop a policy to ensure funds will be used with a race and equity lens.2019 - Q4 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 A formallized process is currently being used for "buy-in" options funds for land trust and other opportunities through a race and equity lens is being created. Review policy and outline requirement and enforcement mechanism to ensure associations and vendors that utilize/rent City facilities are operating in accordance with the city's expectation regarding race equity and inclusion. Post the policy throughout City facilities. 2019 - Q4 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 The policies are currently being reviewed to compile to create more alignment for all associations and vendors. Due to staffing changes, a pause has been placed on this work plan item until 2022. DEVELOPMENT & ENFORCEMENT OF POLICIES COMMUNITY ENGAGMENT & COMMUNICATIONS Updated 10.13.2021 Page 3 of 4 Racial Equity Work Plan GOAL:TARGET STATUS PROGRESS Study and report on the 21st Century Policing Initiative's alignment with City of Edina's police officer field training processes.2019 - Q4 Complete 21st Century Policing Initiative review has been completed by Police Department. Police Department is review officer wellness and recruitment processes. The Police Department will evaluate the Department Policy Manual through a race and equity lens related to use of force.2019 - Q4 Complete Use of Force Policy has been reviewed and placed on City website in Police Department. Policy is updated when POST Board provides edits/revisions. Review the Police Department’s Policy 690.00 of Impartial Policing.2019 - Q4 Complete Police Department Policy 690.00 of Impartial Policing has been reviewed, updated and placed on the City website for public. The Police Department will analyze policies related to external and independent criminal investigations and prosecutions for Officer Involved shootings and In-Custody death incidents.2019 - Q4 Complete Officer involved shooting policy has been updated to include audio/video retention, supervisor to assist, and who speaks with media. Review the Police Department's Conduct of Department Members and Persons of Detained or In- Custody policies and consider adding a provision to current policies requiring officers to identify to individuals stopped or detained as soon as practical and reasonable. 2019 - Q4 Complete Review of Conduct of Department Members and Persons Detained or In-Custoday policies have been completed and added on Police Department website . Review feasibility of developing a policy to create an incentive for sellers to take Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loans.2019 - TBD Complete/ Continuation in 2020 Based on research of feasibility, process for FHA approval is cumbersome and expensive. An alternative process would be potentially combining mortgage with Come Home 2 Edina mortgage. GOAL:TARGET STATUS PROGRESS Participate in a Twin Cities People of Color (POC) job fair in 2019 as either an employer or sponsor.2019 - Q4 Complete City staff and leadership participated in the October 2019 People of Color Job Fair in Minneapolis. Develop diversity recruiting strategy for City employees that identifies specific actions to be taken on an annual basis to more closely reflect demographics or Hennepin County.2019 - Q4 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 Staffing will be focusing creating a strategy that distinguishes between sourcing and recruiting will be looking at this in 2022. Human Resources staff will implement hiring practices to include more racially and culturally diverse outreach, inclusive applications questions, recruitment, selection and interview processes.2019 - Q4 Complete Application process has been revised such as interview question has been added through a race/diversity lens, interview panel training for staff. These changes have been completed and the next step will be assess the effectiveness of the changes. Hiring manager training will be reviewed in 2021. The City will assess and revise job descriptions as positions become available to include racial equity competencies.2019 - Q4 Ongoing/ Continuation in 2020 Job descriptions are being revised when positions are available for hiring. A race and equity competency general statement has been added when job descriptions are being revised. A welcoming and inclusive statement has been added to Edina job posting website. Train employees on the City code of conduct, safety and security procedures, language interpretation services and cost options.2019 - Q4 In Progress/ Continuation in 2020 Due to COVD-19, no in person training with Parks and Recreation has taken place in 2020 or Q1-2021. All City training offered to staff is being compiled to assess feasibilty of combining certain trainings to avoid redundancy. Set goals of increasing the percentage of fulltime staff who are people of color and/or fluent in a language other than English.2019 - Q4 Ongoing/ Continuous in 2020 There has been an increase in People of Color who have applied, interviewed, and hired in 2019 and 2020 will be complied by end of 2021. The City will include data on its employment goals in the Racial Equity Advancement Annual Report starting in 2020 for employment activities in 2019. 2020 - Q4 In Progress Human Resources and Race and Equity Coordinator gathering yearly data from human resource management system. This work plan will coincide with looking at the data set of people who applied, inerview and have been hired in 2019 and 2020. Anticipated by end of 2021. Research the City’s participation in, or establishment of, a program like Pathways to Policing to develop future candidates for careers in local law enforcement for people of color.2021 - Q4 Started Police Department and Fire Department looking at current in-department proceses for future candidates and will evaluate what possible options in recruitment for people of color in law enforcement. EMPLOYEE TRAINING & DIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT & ENFORCEMENT OF POLICIES Updated 10.13.2021 Page 4 of 4 Date: October 19, 2021 Agenda Item #: XIV. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Calendar of City Council Meetings and Events Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None; information only. INTRODUCTION: Date Time Meeting/Event Location Tues, Oct 19 5:30 p.m.2022-2023 Budget / Sustainable Building Policy Community Room 7:00 p.m.City Council Regular Meeting Council Chambers Thurs, Oct 28 7:30 a.m.Housing and Redevelopment Authority Council Chambers Tues, Nov 2 Edina School District General Election Wed, Nov 3 5:30 p.m.Board and Commission Annual Work Plan Community Room 7:00 p.m.City Council Regular Meeting Council Chambers Thurs, Nov 11 Veterans Day – City Hall closed Tues, Nov 16 5:30 p.m.2022-2023 Budget / Human Services Task Force Community Room 7:00 p.m.City Council Regular Meeting Council Chambers Thurs, Nov 18 7:30 a.m.Housing and Redevelopment Authority Council Chambers Thur-Fri, Nov 25-26 Thanksgiving Holiday – City Hall closed