Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-11-03 City Council Meeting PacketAgenda City Council Meeting City of Edina, Minnesota Edina City Hall Council Chambers Wednesday, November 3, 2021 7:00 PM Watch the meeting on cable TV or at EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeetings or Facebook.com/EdinaMN. Participate in Community Comment and Public Hearing in person, or Call 800-374-0221. Enter Conference ID 8682407. Give the operator your name, street address and telephone number. Press *1 on your telephone keypad when you would like to get in the queue to speak. A City sta6 member will introduce you when it is your turn. I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Pledge of Allegiance IV.Approval Of Meeting Agenda V.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Mayor will invite residents to share issues or concerns that are not scheduled for a future public hearing. Items that are on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. The City Manager will respond to questions raised during Community Comments at the next meeting. A.City Manager's Response to Community Comments VI.Adoption Of Consent Agenda All agenda items listed on the Consent Agenda will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless requested to be removed by a Council Member. If removed the item will be considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve, unless otherwise noted in consent item.) A.Approve Minutes: Work Session and Regular, October 19, 2021 B.Approve Payment of Claims C.Resolution No. 2021-97 & Ordinance No. 2021-03: Site Improvement Plan Agreement, and Final Rezoning from PCD-1 and APD to PUD at 4917 Eden Avenue D.Request for Purchase: Clean Water Strategy Professional Services Scope, Phase 1 E.Approve Revised Tree Removal Special Assessment for 7 Woodland Road F.Approve Public Utilty Improvement Agreements G.Resolution No. 2021-100: Setting Public Improvement Hearings Date for Blake Road A, B, & C and Morningside D & E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction H.Resolution No. 2021-101: Requesting Variance from State Aid Standards for Blake Road from Spruce Road to Scriver Road I.Approve Contract Amendment with Tyler Technologies J.Request for Purchase: Water Treatment Plant No. 6 Filter Improvements K.Request for Purchase: Sewer and Water Pump L.Request for Purchase: 2022 Western Star Tandem-Axle Truck with Plow M.Request for Purchase: 2022 Ford F250 4x4 Truck N.Request for Purchase: 2022 Western Star Truck and Log Loader O.Resolution No. 2021-102: Accepting Grant from Innovations for Aging LLC for Senior Center P.Approve New ODcer for Existing Liquor License for RH F & B Minnesota, LLC dba RH Q.Resolution No. 2021-104: Accepting Donations VII.Special Recognitions And Presentations A.East Grandview Transportation Study VIII.Public Hearings During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after staF and/or applicants make their presentations. The following guidelines are in place to ensure an eDcient, fair, and respectful hearing; limit your testimony to three minutes and to the matter under consideration; the Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary; avoid repeating remarks or points of view made by previous speakers. The use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution 2021-105 Approving Spending Plan for Southdale 2, Pentagon Park and 70th & Cahill Tax Increment Financing Districts B.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2021-103 & Ordinance No. 2021-13: Zoning Ordinance Amendment and Revised Overall Development Plan for the US Bank Site at 7001 and 7025 France Avenue IX.Reports/Recommendations: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A.Resolution 2021-99: Establishing Eden Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District B.Approve Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Agreement for 4917 Eden Avenue C.Resolution No. 2021-71: Right-of-Way Easement Vacation at 4904 Bywood West D.ConKrm Appointment of Mr. David Kendall of the Campbell Knutson Law Firm as City Attorney E.ConKrm Appointment of Mr. Patrick Leach of Leach Law ODce as City Prosecuting Attorney F.Resolution No. 2021-106: ADrming and Authorizing the Submission of a Request for State Bonding Bill Funding X.Commission Correspondence (Minutes and Advisory Communication) A.Minutes: Energy & Environment Commission, September 9, 2021 XI.Aviation Noise Update XII.Mayor And Council Comments A.City Hall Public Meeting Room Policy XIII.Manager's Comments A.Council Prep, Nov. 3, 2021 XIV.Calendar of City Council Meetings and Events XV.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampliKcation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:City Manager's Response to Community Comments Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: City Manager Neal will respond to questions asked at the previous council meeting. Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve Minutes: Work Session and Regular, October 19, 2021 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Minutes as presented. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: Draft Work Session, October 19, 2021 Minutes: Draft Regular Meeting, October 19, 2021 MINUTES OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL TUESDAY, OCTOBER 19, 2021 5:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:33 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, and Mayor Hovland. Staff in attendance: Scott Neal, City Manager; Lisa Schaefer, Assistant City Manager; Alisha McAndrews, Finance Director; Grace Hancock, Sustainability Coordinator; Chad Millner, Engineering Director; Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager; Mikala Turner, GreenCorps Intern; Risi Karim, City Management Fellow; and Sharon Allison, City Clerk. 2022-2023 BUDGET AND BUDGET WORK PLAN Finance Director MacAndrews presented the proposed budget and preliminary levy for 2022-2023. McAndrews stated that the 2021 Quality of Life survey showed that residents felt they received excellent or good value for taxes paid and maintaining and improving valued services requires keeping up with inflationary presentation which were the budget levy, excluding the Special Street Levy, that was 5.71% for 2022 and 5.30% for 2023, and debt service change that allowed staff to reduce the overall levy and debt service, the drivers of the levy change for 2022, internal service funds, and that the 2022 estimated levy impacts on a median valued home would be approximately 4.87%. SUSTAINABLE BUILDINGS POLICY PROPOSAL Sustainability Coordinator Hancock introduced Mikala Turner, a GreenCorps intern working in the engineering department, and Community Program and Policy Manager Katie Jones from the Center for Energy, who facilitated development of the proposed policy. Hancock said the policy was developed to address existing practices and reduction goals. She explained how the policy affected the triple bottom line, that architects feedback showed that increased building cost with the policy would be 1-2%. The data shows that a building built under this policy would be more efficient, and that it would be applicable for new or remodeled construction. Hancock explained the policy triggers that are in line with other cities, rating system, compliance, and effective date. The effective date would be April 1, 2022, and because staff does not have the capacity inhouse for implementation, Hancock recommended partnering with Hennepin County Efficient Building Collaborative, a group that Edina is already working with. Next steps were Council approval of the proposed policy and implementation. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ____________________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by the Edina City Council, November 3, 2021. ___________________________________________ Edina City Council Work Session Meeting, September 9, 2021 James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 19, 2021 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. then shared the procedure for public hearing and community comment in the hybrid meeting format. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland. Absent: None. III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IV. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED AS PRESENTED Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, to approve the meeting agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT Nora Davis, 6921 Southdale Road, shared concerns about the number of mature trees being removed throughout the City, including the 4404 Valley View site. She spoke about the value of trees, noting while many had been replanted more were being removed. She encouraged the Council to consider retaining trees where possible. V.A. CITY MANAGER’S RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY COMMENTS Manager Neal responded to Community Comments from the last meeting. VI. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED AS PRESENTED Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce approving the consent agenda as amended, removing Item VI.Q, Resolution No. 2021-96 and Ordinance No. 2021-05; Site Improvement Plan Agreement and Final Rezoning from PCD-3 to PUD at 4040 70th Street West: VI.A. Approve minutes of the Work Session and Regular Meetings of October 5, 2021 VI.B. Approve Claims for Payment for Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated October 8, 2021, totaling $3,262,296.28 and Pre-List Dated October 15, 2021, totaling $2,156,578.05 VI.C. Approve Pentagon Village LLC Redevelopment Agreement Amendment No. 3 VI.D. Request for Purchase; Two Trackless Snow Machines, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, MacQueen Equipment, LLC, $250,198 VI.E. Request for Purchase; Multiquip Generator, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Multiquip, Inc., $36,629 VI.F. Request for Purchase; 2022 Ford F550 with Service Body and Crane, Boyer Ford, $50,234 and Aspen Equipment, $78,775 for a total cost of $129,009 VI.G. Request for Purchase; Edina Liquor Advertising Contract, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Comcast Spotlight, $40,000 VI.H. Adopt Resolution 2021-91; Authorizing Flood Hazard Mitigation Grant Assistance Application Minutes/Edina City Council/October 19, 2021 Page 2 VI.I. Adopt Resolution 2021-92; Setting Public Hearing Date for Municipal Consent of MnDOT I-494 to Highway 169 Project VI.J. Approve Master Agreement for Design Services with HGA VI.K. Request for Purchase; Blake Road Final Design, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, WSB, $196,408 VI.L. Request for Purchase; Change Order No. 1; Watermain Rehabilitation, Contract ENG21-7, Improvement WM-597, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Fer-Pal Construction USA LLC, $86,594 VI.M. Request for Purchase; Facility Asset Management Software Tool Renewal, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Gordian, $50,296 VI.N. Adopt Resolution No. 2021-94; Providing for the Sale of Refunding Bonds VI.O. Adopt Resolution No. 2021-95; Amending the Budget for the Year 2021 VI.P. Adopt Ordinance No. 2021-10; Site Improvement Plan Agreement for 4911 77th street West VI.Q. Resolution No. 2021-96 and Ordinance No. 2021-05; Site Improvement Plan Agreement and Final Rezoning from PCD-3 to PUD at 4040 70th Street West VI.R. Adopt Resolution No. 2021-98; Accepting Donations Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA: VI.Q. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-96 AND ORDINANCE NO. 2021-05; SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN AGREEMENT AND FINAL REZONING FROM PCD-3 TO PUD AT 4040 70TH STREET WEST – ADOPTED The Council inquired about the site improvement plan agreement for this site and suggested increasing the liability insurance level in the future. Community Development Director Teague outlined the limitation of construction hours, third party contractors on site, liability insurance requirements, and confirmed the agreement isolated liability to the developer. Member Anderson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2021-96 and Ordinance No. 2021-05; Site Improvement Plan Agreement and Final Rezoning from PCD-3 to PUD at 4040 70th Street West. Member Staunton seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. VII. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS VII.A. NOVEMBER 1, 2021, AS EXTRA MILE DAY 2021 – PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read in full a proclamation to declaring November 1, 2021, as Extra Mile Day in Edina, intended to remind individuals and organizations that one person could make a difference. VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS - Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VIII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-99 ESTABLISHING EDEN WILLSON TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT – ADOPTED Economic Development Manager Neuendorf shared this item pertained to the potential creation of a new tax increment financing district (TIF) in order to provide funding for a combination of private redevelopment and public improvements. He reviewed history of the site, existing conditions including the roadway network, then summarized the proposal for the former Perkins property. He outlined the developer’s request for $5.1 million in TIF support over 15 years to make the project viable. Mr. Neuendorf shared how the property tax base, if constructed, would increase from $3 million to $55 million, then outlined the boundaries and goal to create a 25-year TIF district. He concluded the site qualified as a redevelopment TIF district and that a proposed quality of scale project would not occur without establishment of a TIF district. Minutes/Edina City Council/October 19, 2021 Page 3 Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:36 p.m. Public Testimony Janet Dietrich, 4816 Woodhill Way, addressed the Council. Stephen Makredes, 4916 W. Sunnyslope Road, addressed the Council. Paul Porter, 4928 Dale Drive, addressed the Council. Bill Bailey, 4808 E. Sunnyslope Road, addressed the Council. Steve Dietrich, 4816 Woodhill Way, addressed the Council. Hope Melton, 4825 Valley View Road, addressed the Council. Julie Risser, 6112 Ashcroft Avenue, addressed the Council. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, to close the public hearing at noon on October 25, 2021, and continue action on Resolution No. 2021-99 establishing the Eden Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District to the November 3, 2021, meeting. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. IX. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS IX.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-80; WEED MOWING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, IMPROVEMENT NO. WD-21 – ADOPTED Assistant Director Parks & Natural Resources Swenson summarized the proposed weed mowing special assessment and noted the assessment for 6708 Cornelia Drive had been removed since the public hearing was held so the assessment roll had changed from 12 properties to 11 properties. Member Jackson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2021-80 levying special assessments for Improvement No. WD-21 weed mowing. Member Pierce seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IX.B. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-81; TREE REMOVAL SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, IMPROVEMENT NO. TR-21 – ADOPTED Manager Neal summarized the proposed tree removal special assessment and shared that after review of the notification process used for the property at 7 Woodland Road recommended that Council adopt the full assessment with the exception of this property and recommend that staff meet with the property owner before adoption of that assessment. Member Jackson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2021-81 levying special assessments for Improvement No. TR-21 tree removal with the removal of the assessment for 7 Woodland Road for consideration at a future meeting. Member Staunton seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. Minutes/Edina City Council/October 19, 2021 Page 4 IX.C. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-82; GRANDVIEW BUSINESS DISTRICT SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, IMPROVEMENT NO. G-21 – ADOPTED Member Staunton introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2021-82 levying special assessments for public improvements. Member Jackson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IX.D. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-83; AQUATIC VEGETATION SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ-21 – ADOPTED Member Jackson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2021-83 levying special assessments for public improvements. Member Anderson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IX.E. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-84; 50TH AND FRANCE BUSINESS DISTRICT SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, IMPROVEMENT NO. M-21 – ADOPTED Member Anderson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2021-84 levying special assessments for public improvements. Member Staunton seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IX.F. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-85; WEST 58TH STREET NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-456 – ADOPTED City Engineer Director Millner summarized the proposed special assessment for the West 58th Street neighborhood roadway reconstruction project. He said one objection had been received from the property owner at 5733 Beard Avenue who had been notified of next steps in the process should he wish to continue to object. Member Staunton introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2021-85 levying special assessments for public improvements. Member Anderson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IX.G. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-86; CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT UTILITIES NO. DU-21 – ADOPTED Finance Director McAndrews summarized the proposed certification of delinquent utilities. Member Staunton introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2021-86 authorizing the certification of delinquent utility charges to the Hennepin County auditor. Member Pierce seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IX.H. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-88; DENYING PRELIMINARY REZONING AND PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH MULTIPLE VARIANCES FOR CITY HOMES AT 4630 FRANCE AVENUE – ADOPTED Mr. Teague reviewed the proposal to tear down the existing home and construct two villa homes. He said Planning Commission staff recommended approval of the rezoning and two of the requested variances for the side yard and lot size but the rear yard and lot coverage were recommended for denial. He spoke about Minutes/Edina City Council/October 19, 2021 Page 5 the proposed turning radius that would be problematic and number of comments received on Better Together and the preference for a twinhome. He spoke about standards for setbacks and impacts of the requested variances. Dave Remmick, City Homes, responded to Council questions. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Member Staunton introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2021-88 Denying Preliminary Rezoning From R-1, Single-Dwelling Unit District To PRD-2 Planned Residential District, Preliminary Plat, Side Yard Setback Variance from 20 Feet to 7 Feet and 15 Feet, Lot Size Variance from 7,300 SF to 5,016 SF, Rear Yard Setback Variance from 35 Feet to 25 Feet and the Building Coverage Variance from 25% to 26% at 4630 France Avenue. Member Pierce seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IX.I. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-89; SITE PLAN REVIEW WITH VARIANCES AT 6500 BARRIE ROAD – ADOPTED Mr. Teague outlined the proposed project to tear down the existing 16,032-square foot medical office building and construct a new 24,000-square foot medical office and surgery center. He said the applicant had revised their plans to accommodate recommendations of the Planning Commission so staff was recommending approval. He spoke about the intent to relocate or reconfigure the entrance on the corner of 65th and Barrie to be more prominent and extend the sidewalk on 65th to the lot line as well as increase the parking variance to accommodate a second drive entrance on Barrie Road rather than one on 65th Street. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Member Jackson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2021-89 approving a Site Plan Review with Variances at 6500 Barrie Road for Construction of a New Medical Office and Surgery Center. Member Anderson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IX.J. ORDINANCE NO. 2021-11; AMENDING CHAPTER 20 CONCERNING GREEN TO GO PACKAGING – FIRST READING HELD Vice Chair Horan, Energy and Environment Commission, presented the proposed Green to Go packaging ordinance in detail which would be a tool the City could use to promote waste reduction, encourage recycling, and minimize contamination in organics and recycling waste. She outlined who would be affected which included restaurants and food trucks, cafeterias, coffee shops, and catering and stated the ordinance would not apply to manufactures, brokers, and others. She spoke about increased awareness with plastic waste and single use items such as straws, utensils, cups and lids, and the goal to reduce plastic waste overall. Vice Chair Horan shared how being green was good business and the policy would support what many businesses were already doing and create a level playing field for packaging costs, create more demand and options and decrease in pricing. She spoke how the ordinance would help reach the City’s goal of 75% recycling goal by 2030 and how the action would help reduce contamination of waste streams that affected landfills. She outlined the importance of education of such programs and noted the increase in take-out meals would likely continue which was why the ordinance was so important. Sustainability Coordinator Hancock shared comments regarding sustainability and Hennepin County’s goals to reduce waste by 75% by 2030 and how this ordinance would help contribute to this goal. She noted 2% of greenhouse emissions came from waste which would help reduce that impact as well. Minutes/Edina City Council/October 19, 2021 Page 6 Community Health Director Brown commented how the ordinance would be incorporated with public education and offered support of the proposed ordinance. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Member Staunton made a motion to grant First Reading to Ordinance No. 2021-11 amending Chapter 20 of the Edina City Code concerning Green To Go Packaging. Member Jackson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. IX.K. REVISED 30% DESIGN LAYOUT FOR MORNINGSIDE FLOOD INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT – APPROVED Mr. Millner summarized feedback received for the Morningside flood infrastructure project that included a revised 30% design plan of ice rink and open skate unchanged, creation of flat space between fields, and removed outfield fence. He stated the ice rink would remain in the existing location, rink lighting and boards would be improved as part of a separate contract, and the open skate area from the ice rink to Grimes Avenue would remain unchanged and considered as part of a future Park’s improvement project. He said the revised layout that would maintain two multi-use fields would add approximately $500,000 in additional grading and pipe to safely transmit flood flows across the park and under the southeast multi-use field and that staff would continue to look for opportunities to value engineer the project to better align with the initial budget estimate. Mr. Millner outlined the communication process used with residents and budget impacts then shared the proposed schedule and next steps. The Council asked questions and provided feedback. Member Jackson made a motion, seconded by Member Pierce, to approve the revised 30% design layout for the Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project. Rollcall: Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. X. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS - Received X.A. MINUTES: COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMISSION, AUGUST 9, 2021 X.B. MINUTES: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION, SEPTEMBER 14, 2021 XI. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE – Received XII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received XIII. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received XIII.A. BUDGET WORK PLAN AND RACE AND EQUITY WORK PLAN UPDATES XIV. CALENDAR OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AND EVENTS – Received XV. ADJOURNMENT Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Jackson, to adjourn the meeting at 9:52 p.m. Ayes: Anderson, Jackson, Pierce, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. Minutes/Edina City Council/October 19, 2021 Page 7 Respectfully submitted, Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, November 3, 2021. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the October 19, 2021, meeting available. Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Claims From:Alisha McAndrews, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Approve Payment of Claims Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve claims for payment: Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 10.22.21#1 TOTAL $2,500.00 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 10.22.21#2 TOTAL $1,610,890.86 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 10.29.21 TOTAL $1,913,724.45 INTRODUCTION: Claims information for approval is attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 10.22.21#1 TOTAL $2,500.00 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 10.22.21#2 TOTAL $1,610,890.86 Check Register Claims Pre-List Dated 10.29.21 TOTAL $1,913,724.45 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:09User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 4 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND SUB FUND DUE TO DUE FR 1000 General 2,500.009999 Pooled Cash Fund 2,500.00 TOTAL 2,500.00 2,500.00 ** END OF REPORT - Generated by Shirleng Tan Geil ** City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:09User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 1 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465810 10/22/2021 PRTD 999995 Allied Construction LLC ED187635-REFUND 10/18/2021 20211021 2,500.00 CHECK 465810 TOTAL: 2,500.00 NUMBER OF CHECKS 1 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** 2,500.00 COUNT AMOUNT TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS 1 2,500.00 *** GRAND TOTAL *** 2,500.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 36 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND SUB FUND DUE TO DUE FR 1000 General 100,731.422100 Police Special Revenue 1,000.002600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 1,411.004000 Capital Projects 23,163.144200 Equipment Replacement 4,845.614400 PIR Capital Projects 12,164.005200 Braemar Golf Course 3,565.185400 Edinborough Park 664.595500 Braemar Arena 13,993.165700 Centennial Lakes 4,581.655800 Liquor 254,623.145900 Utility Fund 325,293.405900 Utility Fund 678,712.655900 Utility Fund 81,235.155900 Utility Fund 67,985.006100 Equipment Operations 20,245.256200 Information Technology 8,498.666300 Facilities Management 225.407100 PS Training Facility 335.277200 MN Task Force 1 7,617.199999 Pooled Cash Fund 1,610,890.86 TOTAL 1,610,890.86 1,610,890.86 ** END OF REPORT - Generated by Shirleng Tan Geil ** City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 1 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465811 10/22/2021 PRTD 133644 A DYNAMIC DOOR CO INC 22109212 09/25/2021 20211022 2,323.45 CHECK 465811 TOTAL: 2,323.45 465812 10/22/2021 PRTD 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 0168668-IN 09/20/2021 20211022 63.04 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 0168902-IN 10/08/2021 20211022 1,937.48 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 0168682-IN 09/20/2021 20211022 644.66 CHECK 465812 TOTAL: 2,645.18 465813 10/22/2021 PRTD 129458 ACME ELECTRIC MOTOR INC 9153109 09/22/2021 20211022 66.92 CHECK 465813 TOTAL: 66.92 465814 10/22/2021 PRTD 143143 ACT CLEANING SERVICE 1795 10/01/2021 20211022 1,462.34 CHECK 465814 TOTAL: 1,462.34 465815 10/22/2021 PRTD 121667 ADVANCED FIRST AID INC 0921-586 09/27/2021 20211022 323.78 CHECK 465815 TOTAL: 323.78 465816 10/22/2021 PRTD 100575 AMERICAN CYLINDER LLC 191411 09/27/2021 20211022 159.64 CHECK 465816 TOTAL: 159.64 465817 10/22/2021 PRTD 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1GHJ-D9H3-GRK6 09/21/2021 20211022 28.95 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1GHJ-D9H3-LMNP 09/22/2021 20211022 13.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1TN4-GL13-MT1K 09/22/2021 20211022 1,051.24 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1Y7D-QJNP-N3RP 09/22/2021 20211022 21.67 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1TN4-GL13-Y7YH 09/22/2021 20211022 1,086.53 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1HKV-4MQF-JGMP 09/24/2021 20211022 233.29 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 17WR-DGVQ-QKLV 09/24/2021 20211022 88.56 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1R36-N3WR-TCGL 09/24/2021 20211022 60.40 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 177L-N6Q3-VL9G 09/26/2021 20211022 37.64 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 2 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 19TX-RGJC-XYRT 09/27/2021 20211022 97.48 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1LLD-RRDR-664W 09/27/2021 20211022 39.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 11LJ-TKQX-J7W3 09/27/2021 20211022 34.97 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1QN9-HMRD-KQ9G 09/27/2021 20211022 28.48 CHECK 465817 TOTAL: 2,822.20 465818 10/22/2021 PRTD 151441 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 1005148547 09/21/2021 20211022 178.13 CHECK 465818 TOTAL: 178.13 465819 10/22/2021 PRTD 151756 ARBEITER BREWING COMPANY LLC 447 09/30/2021 20211022 96.00 CHECK 465819 TOTAL: 96.00 465820 10/22/2021 PRTD 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0091693100 10/06/2021 20211022 -7.33 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0091685400 10/07/2021 20211022 1,874.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0091613400 10/07/2021 20211022 395.65 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0104041500 10/07/2021 20211022 254.96 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0091621500 10/07/2021 20211022 293.65 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0104041600 10/07/2021 20211022 25.66 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0104059100 10/07/2021 20211022 177.81 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0091675500 10/07/2021 20211022 4,810.65 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0091621700 10/07/2021 20211022 439.75 CHECK 465820 TOTAL: 8,264.80 465821 10/22/2021 PRTD 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 863081 09/21/2021 20211022 448.29 CHECK 465821 TOTAL: 448.29 465822 10/22/2021 PRTD 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 14636 10/07/2021 20211022 281.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 14635 10/07/2021 20211022 280.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 3 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465822 TOTAL: 561.00 465823 10/22/2021 PRTD 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC 0276141 09/22/2021 20211022 6,968.00 BOLTON & MENK INC 0276140 09/22/2021 20211022 740.00 BOLTON & MENK INC 0276139 09/22/2021 20211022 356.00 BOLTON & MENK INC 0276282 09/24/2021 20211022 3,560.00 CHECK 465823 TOTAL: 11,624.00 465824 10/22/2021 PRTD 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84222380 09/23/2021 20211022 168.36 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84226500 09/27/2021 20211022 .12 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 64328088 09/27/2021 20211022 2,352.00 CHECK 465824 TOTAL: 2,520.48 465825 10/22/2021 PRTD 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 181381 10/05/2021 20211022 589.25 BOURGET IMPORTS 181382 10/05/2021 20211022 922.00 BOURGET IMPORTS 181383 10/05/2021 20211022 990.75 CHECK 465825 TOTAL: 2,502.00 465826 10/22/2021 PRTD 117040 ALLIANCE PARTS TRUCK AND TRAILER 007P15903 09/22/2021 20211022 354.14 ALLIANCE PARTS TRUCK AND TRAILER 007P16031 09/22/2021 20211022 33.69 CHECK 465826 TOTAL: 387.83 465827 10/22/2021 PRTD 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION B267495 09/22/2021 20211022 2,844.00 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION B267478 09/22/2021 20211022 1,411.00 CHECK 465827 TOTAL: 4,255.00 465828 10/22/2021 PRTD 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341307632 10/06/2021 20211022 5,619.88 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341307630 10/06/2021 20211022 57.35 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341307629 10/06/2021 20211022 2,491.16 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 4 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341307649 10/06/2021 20211022 3,849.03 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341307648 10/06/2021 20211022 1,667.45 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341307651 10/06/2021 20211022 41.27 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341307650 10/06/2021 20211022 538.60 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341307631 10/06/2021 20211022 109.23 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341307654 10/06/2021 20211022 460.60 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341307655 10/06/2021 20211022 195.76 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341307652 10/06/2021 20211022 109.23 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341307647 10/06/2021 20211022 109.23 CHECK 465828 TOTAL: 15,248.79 465829 10/22/2021 PRTD 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 341271501 09/28/2021 20211022 2,164.80 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 341271500 09/28/2021 20211022 138.50 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 341271495 09/28/2021 20211022 5,512.00 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 341326202 10/05/2021 20211022 1,279.60 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 341326204 10/05/2021 20211022 345.00 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 341326203 10/05/2021 20211022 83.10 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 341326194 10/05/2021 20211022 345.00 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 360328424 09/21/2021 20211022 -12.30 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 360328423 09/21/2021 20211022 -25.95 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 360424683 10/07/2021 20211022 -12.30 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 341326200 10/05/2021 20211022 345.00 CHECK 465829 TOTAL: 10,162.45 465830 10/22/2021 PRTD 100648 BERTELSON BROTHERS INC WO-1148686-1 09/27/2021 20211022 45.97 CHECK 465830 TOTAL: 45.97 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 5 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465831 10/22/2021 PRTD 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2603047 10/01/2021 20211022 3,426.80 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2603046 10/01/2021 20211022 45.98 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2603045 10/01/2021 20211022 58.50 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2603041 10/01/2021 20211022 38.25 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2603042 10/01/2021 20211022 1,786.00 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2604195 10/05/2021 20211022 292.50 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2604196 10/05/2021 20211022 3,448.80 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2604194 10/05/2021 20211022 86.75 CHECK 465831 TOTAL: 9,183.58 465832 10/22/2021 PRTD 160207 JASON THOMAS CARDINAL EFP2021-1 09/27/2021 20211022 1,700.00 CHECK 465832 TOTAL: 1,700.00 465833 10/22/2021 PRTD 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY C2419078 09/21/2021 20211022 1,160.00 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY C2420013 09/22/2021 20211022 483.00 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY C2422975 09/27/2021 20211022 936.00 CHECK 465833 TOTAL: 2,579.00 465834 10/22/2021 PRTD 103300 CENTER FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT 20168 09/21/2021 20211022 4,000.00 CHECK 465834 TOTAL: 4,000.00 465835 10/22/2021 PRTD 105497 CENTRAL ROOFING COMPANY 29329 09/21/2021 20211022 10,568.75 CHECK 465835 TOTAL: 10,568.75 465836 10/22/2021 PRTD 151771 CHRONOGOLF INC CGBRAEMAR-0010 09/25/2021 20211022 663.00 CHECK 465836 TOTAL: 663.00 465837 10/22/2021 PRTD 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 4094327253 08/30/2021 20211022 49.01 CINTAS CORPORATION 4094327079 08/30/2021 20211022 11.78 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 6 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CINTAS CORPORATION 4094327009 08/30/2021 20211022 40.55 CINTAS CORPORATION 4094327209 08/30/2021 20211022 27.84 CINTAS CORPORATION 4094989642 09/07/2021 20211022 27.65 CINTAS CORPORATION 4094989491 09/07/2021 20211022 33.05 CINTAS CORPORATION 4094989562 09/07/2021 20211022 11.78 CINTAS CORPORATION 4094989664 09/07/2021 20211022 27.57 CINTAS CORPORATION 4097561354 10/01/2021 20211022 81.48 CINTAS CORPORATION 4097667210 10/04/2021 20211022 68.69 CHECK 465837 TOTAL: 379.40 465838 10/22/2021 PRTD 124749 CITY OF EAGAN 26278 09/23/2021 20211022 1,719.90 CHECK 465838 TOTAL: 1,719.90 465839 10/22/2021 PRTD 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 7828 09/30/2021 20211022 799.92 CHECK 465839 TOTAL: 799.92 465840 10/22/2021 PRTD 100087 CITY OF SAINT PAUL IN46695 08/31/2021 20211022 250.00 CHECK 465840 TOTAL: 250.00 465841 10/22/2021 PRTD 146472 CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE OF MN 42009001620 09/23/2021 20211022 2,000.00 CHECK 465841 TOTAL: 2,000.00 465842 10/22/2021 PRTD 160222 SCHIPPER & CO USA, INC. 345866 09/01/2021 20211022 767.05 CHECK 465842 TOTAL: 767.05 465843 10/22/2021 PRTD 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC 0212627-IN 09/27/2021 20211022 102.63 CHECK 465843 TOTAL: 102.63 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 7 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465844 10/22/2021 PRTD 160189 COYLE, ANN 1008 09/24/2021 20211022 1,050.00 CHECK 465844 TOTAL: 1,050.00 465845 10/22/2021 PRTD 144880 CRYSTAL LAKE UPHOLSTERY 2249 09/24/2021 20211022 100.00 CHECK 465845 TOTAL: 100.00 465846 10/22/2021 PRTD 100699 CULLIGAN SOFTWATER SERVICE COMPAN 114X82772407 09/30/2021 20211022 93.25 CULLIGAN SOFTWATER SERVICE COMPAN 114X82884004 09/30/2021 20211022 105.25 CHECK 465846 TOTAL: 198.50 465847 10/22/2021 PRTD 104020 DALCO ENTERPRISES INC 3835199 09/24/2021 20211022 44.59 CHECK 465847 TOTAL: 44.59 465848 10/22/2021 PRTD 102195 DAY INVESTMENTS LLC P44087725 09/27/2021 20211022 773.26 DAY INVESTMENTS LLC P44322253 10/04/2021 20211022 -131.04 CHECK 465848 TOTAL: 642.22 465849 10/22/2021 PRTD 160094 DISGRUNTLED BREWERY, LLC 81 10/07/2021 20211022 252.00 CHECK 465849 TOTAL: 252.00 465850 10/22/2021 PRTD 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 854895 09/23/2021 20211022 83.30 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 854896 09/23/2021 20211022 89.25 CHECK 465850 TOTAL: 172.55 465851 10/22/2021 PRTD 101630 EDINA COMMUNICATION EDUCATION 2021-1512-JUNE 07/13/2021 20211022 403.00 CHECK 465851 TOTAL: 403.00 465852 10/22/2021 PRTD 103594 EDINALARM INC 68939 10/01/2021 20211022 216.13 CHECK 465852 TOTAL: 216.13 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 8 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465853 10/22/2021 PRTD 160062 ELM CREEK BREWING COMPANY E-1403 10/07/2021 20211022 405.00 ELM CREEK BREWING COMPANY E-1404 10/07/2021 20211022 423.00 CHECK 465853 TOTAL: 828.00 465854 10/22/2021 PRTD 147181 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-4614 10/01/2021 20211022 180.00 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-4657 10/07/2021 20211022 300.00 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-4660 10/07/2021 20211022 180.00 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-4658 10/07/2021 20211022 300.00 CHECK 465854 TOTAL: 960.00 465855 10/22/2021 PRTD 101374 THE FENCE STORE, LLC 1210381 09/22/2021 20211022 3,375.00 CHECK 465855 TOTAL: 3,375.00 465856 10/22/2021 PRTD 103600 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0480176 09/21/2021 20211022 8,631.10 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0482610 09/27/2021 20211022 923.06 CHECK 465856 TOTAL: 9,554.16 465857 10/22/2021 PRTD 102727 FORCE AMERICA DISTRIBUTING LLC 001-1576043 09/24/2021 20211022 27.29 CHECK 465857 TOTAL: 27.29 465858 10/22/2021 PRTD 102456 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1450015 09/23/2021 20211022 98.78 CHECK 465858 TOTAL: 98.78 465859 10/22/2021 PRTD 160225 GARRETT-AKINSANYA,BRAVADA 27149 09/27/2021 20211022 3,000.00 CHECK 465859 TOTAL: 3,000.00 465860 10/22/2021 PRTD 101103 WW GRAINGER 9061044914 09/21/2021 20211022 4.86 CHECK 465860 TOTAL: 4.86 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 9 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465861 10/22/2021 PRTD 144412 WINEBOW MN00101685 10/06/2021 20211022 3,497.75 WINEBOW MN00101696 10/06/2021 20211022 3,523.50 WINEBOW MN00101684 10/06/2021 20211022 1,330.00 CHECK 465861 TOTAL: 8,351.25 465862 10/22/2021 PRTD 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 9323544154 09/24/2021 20211022 3,660.61 CHECK 465862 TOTAL: 3,660.61 465863 10/22/2021 PRTD 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC 243367-1 09/27/2021 20211022 149.31 CHECK 465863 TOTAL: 149.31 465864 10/22/2021 PRTD 151168 HAMMER SPORTS LLC 642 09/26/2021 20211022 118.00 CHECK 465864 TOTAL: 118.00 465865 10/22/2021 PRTD 102618 HARDWOOD CREEK LUMBER INC 12296 09/15/2021 20211022 2,814.00 CHECK 465865 TOTAL: 2,814.00 465866 10/22/2021 PRTD 100797 HAWKINS INC 6030843 09/27/2021 20211022 14,433.99 CHECK 465866 TOTAL: 14,433.99 465867 10/22/2021 PRTD 103085 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000172091 09/28/2021 20211022 236.00 CHECK 465867 TOTAL: 236.00 465868 10/22/2021 PRTD 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC 448456 10/05/2021 20211022 414.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 448270 10/05/2021 20211022 1,017.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 448459 10/05/2021 20211022 46.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 448454 10/05/2021 20211022 72.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 448255 10/05/2021 20211022 2,122.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 10 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465868 TOTAL: 3,671.50 465869 10/22/2021 PRTD 151094 HOPKINS SPORTS CAMPS LLC 20633 08/11/2021 20211022 3,169.20 CHECK 465869 TOTAL: 3,169.20 465870 10/22/2021 PRTD 120085 IDEAL SERVICE 11369 09/21/2021 20211022 285.00 CHECK 465870 TOTAL: 285.00 465871 10/22/2021 PRTD 129508 IMPACT MAILING OF MINNESOTA INC 154796 09/22/2021 20211022 3,495.60 CHECK 465871 TOTAL: 3,495.60 465872 10/22/2021 PRTD 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 105943 10/05/2021 20211022 480.90 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 105941 10/05/2021 20211022 267.45 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 105955 10/05/2021 20211022 294.20 CHECK 465872 TOTAL: 1,042.55 465873 10/22/2021 PRTD 160035 INTEGRATED PROCESS SOLUTIONS, INC #2 PWK 20-003 09/21/2021 20211022 556,894.66 CHECK 465873 TOTAL: 556,894.66 465874 10/22/2021 PRTD 100828 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC EQUIP OPS - 09/2021 09/25/2021 20211022 36.35 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC UTILITIES - 09/2021 09/25/2021 20211022 214.41 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC STREETS - 09/21 09/25/2021 20211022 455.16 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC POL - 09/21 09/25/2021 20211022 8.09 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC ELEC-9/21 09/25/2021 20211022 130.88 CHECK 465874 TOTAL: 844.89 465875 10/22/2021 PRTD 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC 191478 09/22/2021 20211022 68.00 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC 191479 09/22/2021 20211022 68.00 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC 191480 09/22/2021 20211022 68.00 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC 191481 09/22/2021 20211022 68.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 11 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC 191482 09/22/2021 20211022 68.00 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC 191483 09/22/2021 20211022 68.00 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC 191484 09/22/2021 20211022 68.00 CHECK 465875 TOTAL: 476.00 465876 10/22/2021 PRTD 100741 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3236399 09/29/2021 20211022 5,667.68 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3236400 09/29/2021 20211022 5,909.52 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3236452 10/06/2021 20211022 1,252.55 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3236451 10/06/2021 20211022 2,518.65 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3236449 10/06/2021 20211022 445.00 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3236450 10/06/2021 20211022 76.35 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3236448 10/06/2021 20211022 4,076.65 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3236447 10/06/2021 20211022 134.95 CHECK 465876 TOTAL: 20,081.35 465877 10/22/2021 PRTD 100835 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3500422 10/07/2021 20211022 2,259.50 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3500421 10/07/2021 20211022 178.00 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3500423 10/07/2021 20211022 3,300.00 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3500424 10/07/2021 20211022 178.00 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3500425 10/07/2021 20211022 35.60 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3500426 10/07/2021 20211022 1,692.05 CHECK 465877 TOTAL: 7,643.15 465878 10/22/2021 PRTD 100835 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6279755 09/30/2021 20211022 634.23 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6279757 09/30/2021 20211022 1,294.28 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6279754 09/30/2021 20211022 1,307.25 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6279756 09/30/2021 20211022 162.38 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 12 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6283460 10/07/2021 20211022 1,472.65 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6283461 10/07/2021 20211022 452.86 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6283462 10/07/2021 20211022 265.82 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6283463 10/07/2021 20211022 69.03 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6283464 10/07/2021 20211022 2,626.21 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6283469 10/07/2021 20211022 890.18 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6283468 10/07/2021 20211022 2,160.22 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6283465 10/07/2021 20211022 2,848.42 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 644351 09/30/2021 20211022 -9.67 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 644350 09/30/2021 20211022 -10.38 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6283476 10/07/2021 20211022 199.38 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6283475 10/07/2021 20211022 1,053.74 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6283466 10/07/2021 20211022 976.08 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6283473 10/07/2021 20211022 4,774.40 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6283474 10/07/2021 20211022 1,592.43 CHECK 465878 TOTAL: 22,759.51 465879 10/22/2021 PRTD 100835 WINE MERCHANTS 7348874 09/30/2021 20211022 5,980.46 WINE MERCHANTS 7348873 09/30/2021 20211022 244.76 WINE MERCHANTS 7348872 09/30/2021 20211022 26.19 WINE MERCHANTS 739633 09/23/2021 20211022 -4.17 WINE MERCHANTS 739634 09/23/2021 20211022 -4.17 WINE MERCHANTS 7349840 10/07/2021 20211022 1,012.28 WINE MERCHANTS 7349841 10/07/2021 20211022 1,550.27 WINE MERCHANTS 7349844 10/07/2021 20211022 3,229.75 WINE MERCHANTS 7349843 10/07/2021 20211022 447.57 WINE MERCHANTS 7349842 10/07/2021 20211022 24.19 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 13 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET WINE MERCHANTS 739727 09/27/2021 20211022 -637.75 WINE MERCHANTS 7349845 10/07/2021 20211022 2,055.04 WINE MERCHANTS 7349847 10/07/2021 20211022 1,435.37 WINE MERCHANTS 7349848 10/07/2021 20211022 121.19 CHECK 465879 TOTAL: 15,480.98 465880 10/22/2021 PRTD 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899742 09/30/2021 20211022 9,716.49 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899763 09/30/2021 20211022 1,076.23 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899764 09/30/2021 20211022 2,470.06 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899761 09/30/2021 20211022 1,553.50 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1901105 10/01/2021 20211022 725.95 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1901106 10/01/2021 20211022 124.57 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1900186 09/30/2021 20211022 385.10 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 166001 09/27/2021 20211022 -18.84 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899738 09/30/2021 20211022 874.71 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1900018 09/30/2021 20211022 1.19 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899765 09/30/2021 20211022 1,765.10 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1899756 10/01/2021 20211022 863.25 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904716 10/07/2021 20211022 202.94 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904717 10/07/2021 20211022 323.42 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904718 10/07/2021 20211022 315.30 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904719 10/07/2021 20211022 154.33 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904720 10/07/2021 20211022 507.39 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904721 10/07/2021 20211022 93.07 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904722 10/07/2021 20211022 133.19 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904723 10/07/2021 20211022 328.58 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 14 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904724 10/07/2021 20211022 101.09 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904729 10/07/2021 20211022 436.76 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904730 10/07/2021 20211022 116.93 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904715 10/07/2021 20211022 3,824.57 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904725 10/07/2021 20211022 902.28 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904741 10/07/2021 20211022 457.84 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904740 10/07/2021 20211022 3,084.37 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904739 10/07/2021 20211022 2,611.04 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904738 10/07/2021 20211022 926.33 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904737 10/07/2021 20211022 651.49 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904736 10/07/2021 20211022 723.56 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904735 10/07/2021 20211022 648.69 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904734 10/07/2021 20211022 525.50 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904733 10/07/2021 20211022 1,692.72 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904732 10/07/2021 20211022 1,761.29 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904731 10/07/2021 20211022 2,190.93 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904727 10/07/2021 20211022 2,174.88 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904747 10/07/2021 20211022 38.19 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904728 10/07/2021 20211022 2,174.87 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904745 10/07/2021 20211022 1,601.52 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904750 10/07/2021 20211022 692.35 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904754 10/07/2021 20211022 1,617.42 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904746 10/07/2021 20211022 1,048.09 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904748 10/07/2021 20211022 3,407.73 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904749 10/07/2021 20211022 475.33 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904751 10/07/2021 20211022 368.14 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 15 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904752 10/07/2021 20211022 2,611.04 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904753 10/07/2021 20211022 1,524.86 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904726 10/07/2021 20211022 101.09 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1904755 10/07/2021 20211022 387.57 CHECK 465880 TOTAL: 60,474.00 465881 10/22/2021 PRTD 103409 KELBRO COMPANY 2683705 10/07/2021 20211022 18.00 KELBRO COMPANY 2683801 10/07/2021 20211022 134.60 CHECK 465881 TOTAL: 152.60 465882 10/22/2021 PRTD 100944 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 142003 10/05/2021 20211022 3,382.75 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 142006 10/05/2021 20211022 776.00 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 142009 10/05/2021 20211022 2,284.75 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 142010 10/05/2021 20211022 1,803.75 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 142007 10/05/2021 20211022 3,201.75 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 141984 10/05/2021 20211022 89.25 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 141001 09/28/2021 20211022 2,146.99 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 141996 10/05/2021 20211022 1,551.00 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 142011 10/05/2021 20211022 1,924.00 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 141998 10/05/2021 20211022 596.75 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 142012 10/05/2021 20211022 2,575.10 CHECK 465882 TOTAL: 20,332.09 465883 10/22/2021 PRTD 151024 LA DONA SBC 5040 10/06/2021 20211022 216.00 CHECK 465883 TOTAL: 216.00 465884 10/22/2021 PRTD 138280 LAURSEN PIANO SERVICE 092121 09/21/2021 20211022 110.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 16 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465884 TOTAL: 110.00 465885 10/22/2021 PRTD 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9308832967 09/21/2021 20211022 14.68 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9308845073 09/24/2021 20211022 792.06 CHECK 465885 TOTAL: 806.74 465886 10/22/2021 PRTD 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 353822 09/23/2021 20211022 55.00 CHECK 465886 TOTAL: 55.00 465887 10/22/2021 PRTD 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 353805 09/23/2021 20211022 55.00 CHECK 465887 TOTAL: 55.00 465888 10/22/2021 PRTD 135867 LIBATION PROJECT 39486 10/05/2021 20211022 1,052.00 LIBATION PROJECT 39487 10/05/2021 20211022 179.00 LIBATION PROJECT 39488 10/05/2021 20211022 275.00 CHECK 465888 TOTAL: 1,506.00 465889 10/22/2021 PRTD 146427 LUCID BREWING LLC 12041 10/06/2021 20211022 138.00 CHECK 465889 TOTAL: 138.00 465890 10/22/2021 PRTD 141916 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 40584 10/05/2021 20211022 222.00 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 40578 10/05/2021 20211022 352.00 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 40594 10/05/2021 20211022 222.00 CHECK 465890 TOTAL: 796.00 465891 10/22/2021 PRTD 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT LLC P05753 09/22/2021 20211022 119.80 CHECK 465891 TOTAL: 119.80 465892 10/22/2021 PRTD 143394 MAGNET FORENSICS USA INC SIN042732 09/22/2021 20211022 3,840.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 17 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465892 TOTAL: 3,840.00 465893 10/22/2021 PRTD 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 22621627 09/23/2021 20211022 84.26 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 22621626 09/23/2021 20211022 7,788.92 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 22621628 09/23/2021 20211022 4,742.91 CHECK 465893 TOTAL: 12,616.09 465894 10/22/2021 PRTD 116410 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 33339470 09/24/2021 20211022 679.18 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 33356557 09/27/2021 20211022 1,982.73 CHECK 465894 TOTAL: 2,661.91 465895 10/22/2021 PRTD 141215 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV653318 10/05/2021 20211022 462.96 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV653320 10/05/2021 20211022 225.54 MAVERICK WINE LLC INV653315 10/05/2021 20211022 462.96 CHECK 465895 TOTAL: 1,151.46 465896 10/22/2021 PRTD 130477 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 601229 10/06/2021 20211022 1,148.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 601230 10/06/2021 20211022 136.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 601228 10/06/2021 20211022 52.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 601223 10/06/2021 20211022 324.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 601231 10/06/2021 20211022 42.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 601232 10/06/2021 20211022 346.00 CHECK 465896 TOTAL: 2,048.00 465897 10/22/2021 PRTD 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 24764 09/22/2021 20211022 1,206.00 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 24801 09/23/2021 20211022 1,064.00 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 24803 09/23/2021 20211022 3,588.99 CHECK 465897 TOTAL: 5,858.99 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 18 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465898 10/22/2021 PRTD 101483 MENARDS INC 47104 09/21/2021 20211022 3.14 MENARDS INC 47112 09/21/2021 20211022 81.96 MENARDS INC 47311 09/24/2021 20211022 26.22 MENARDS INC 47170 09/22/2021 20211022 41.86 MENARDS INC 47119 09/21/2021 20211022 144.39 MENARDS INC 45985 08/31/2021 20211022 22.84 CHECK 465898 TOTAL: 320.41 465899 10/22/2021 PRTD 100883 MESSERLI & KRAMER 397261 09/27/2021 20211022 1,500.00 CHECK 465899 TOTAL: 1,500.00 465900 10/22/2021 PRTD 100885 METRO SALES INC INV1896794 09/27/2021 20211022 5,385.10 CHECK 465900 TOTAL: 5,385.10 465901 10/22/2021 PRTD 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 0001130548 10/05/2021 20211022 483,781.47 CHECK 465901 TOTAL: 483,781.47 465902 10/22/2021 PRTD 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD LLC 525607 09/24/2021 20211022 25.74 CHECK 465902 TOTAL: 25.74 465903 10/22/2021 PRTD 138732 TRADITION WINE & SPIRITS LLC 28479 10/05/2021 20211022 489.00 TRADITION WINE & SPIRITS LLC 28481 10/05/2021 20211022 489.00 CHECK 465903 TOTAL: 978.00 465904 10/22/2021 PRTD 136248 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT INC P57634 09/23/2021 20211022 42.60 CHECK 465904 TOTAL: 42.60 465905 10/22/2021 PRTD 123909 MINNESOTA SODDING COMPANY LLC 10822 09/27/2021 20211022 776.24 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 19 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465905 TOTAL: 776.24 465906 10/22/2021 PRTD 100252 MINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIV 871417 08/30/2021 20211022 500.00 MINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIV 871384 08/30/2021 20211022 500.00 MINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES AND UNIV 864055 08/10/2021 20211022 600.00 CHECK 465906 TOTAL: 1,600.00 465907 10/22/2021 PRTD 128914 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 31810 09/24/2021 20211022 102.16 CHECK 465907 TOTAL: 102.16 465908 10/22/2021 PRTD 138171 MOBOTREX INC 253642 09/24/2021 22100043 20211022 3,000.00 CHECK 465908 TOTAL: 3,000.00 465909 10/22/2021 PRTD 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC E-25701 10/05/2021 20211022 106.00 MODIST BREWING LLC E-25703 10/05/2021 20211022 106.00 MODIST BREWING LLC E-25702 10/05/2021 20211022 232.00 CHECK 465909 TOTAL: 444.00 465910 10/22/2021 PRTD 108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN 21EP1021 10/18/2021 20211022 250.00 CHECK 465910 TOTAL: 250.00 465911 10/22/2021 PRTD 132591 MUSKA ELECTRIC COMPANY 37860 09/24/2021 20211022 1,867.67 CHECK 465911 TOTAL: 1,867.67 465912 10/22/2021 PRTD 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 2122-736609 07/16/2021 20211022 21.49 CHECK 465912 TOTAL: 21.49 465913 10/22/2021 PRTD 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 179027 10/06/2021 20211022 536.00 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 179028 10/06/2021 20211022 512.00 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 179026 10/06/2021 20211022 562.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 20 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465913 TOTAL: 1,610.00 465914 10/22/2021 PRTD 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 52882 09/21/2021 20211022 543.75 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 52893 09/22/2021 20211022 1,006.68 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 52902 09/24/2021 20211022 154.44 CHECK 465914 TOTAL: 1,704.87 465915 10/22/2021 PRTD 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 174594759001 05/21/2021 20211022 171.94 OFFICE DEPOT 174595876001 05/21/2021 20211022 32.99 CHECK 465915 TOTAL: 204.93 465916 10/22/2021 PRTD 132107 OLS RESTORATION INC 1566 09/03/2021 20211022 2,730.00 CHECK 465916 TOTAL: 2,730.00 465917 10/22/2021 PRTD 141965 OMNI BREWING COMPANY LLC E-10799 10/04/2021 20211022 110.00 CHECK 465917 TOTAL: 110.00 465918 10/22/2021 PRTD 999998 BCBS MN 273-21-0950-REFUND 07/22/2021 20211022 1,531.84 CHECK 465918 TOTAL: 1,531.84 465919 10/22/2021 PRTD 999998 Betty M Diller 273-20-5303-REFUND 07/19/2021 20211022 79.55 CHECK 465919 TOTAL: 79.55 465920 10/22/2021 PRTD 999998 Clair Shaffer 273-21-1704-REFUND 07/26/2021 20211022 85.26 CHECK 465920 TOTAL: 85.26 465921 10/22/2021 PRTD 999998 Clair Shaffer 273-21-1767-REFUND 07/26/2021 20211022 85.26 CHECK 465921 TOTAL: 85.26 465922 10/22/2021 PRTD 999998 David R Nolan 273-20-4816-REFUND 07/21/2021 20211022 33.80 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 21 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465922 TOTAL: 33.80 465923 10/22/2021 PRTD 999998 Hennepin Health 273-21-1121-REFUND 07/22/2021 20211022 88.92 CHECK 465923 TOTAL: 88.92 465924 10/22/2021 PRTD 999998 Hennepin Health 273-21-1632-REFUND 07/22/2021 20211022 377.96 CHECK 465924 TOTAL: 377.96 465925 10/22/2021 PRTD 999998 Hennepin Health 273-20-4951-REFUND 07/22/2021 20211022 88.69 CHECK 465925 TOTAL: 88.69 465926 10/22/2021 PRTD 999998 Hennepin Health 273-20-5162-REFUND 07/22/2021 20211022 88.69 CHECK 465926 TOTAL: 88.69 465927 10/22/2021 PRTD 999998 Hennepin Health 273-21-0121-REFUND 07/22/2021 20211022 204.09 CHECK 465927 TOTAL: 204.09 465928 10/22/2021 PRTD 999998 Hennepin Health 273-21-0225-REFUND 07/22/2021 20211022 99.30 CHECK 465928 TOTAL: 99.30 465929 10/22/2021 PRTD 999998 Hennepin Health 273-21-0920-REFUND 07/22/2021 20211022 88.92 CHECK 465929 TOTAL: 88.92 465930 10/22/2021 PRTD 999998 Hennepin Health 273-21-0384-REFUND 07/22/2021 20211022 88.92 CHECK 465930 TOTAL: 88.92 465931 10/22/2021 PRTD 999998 JOANNE A SMITH 23854 09/08/2021 20211022 93.50 CHECK 465931 TOTAL: 93.50 465932 10/22/2021 PRTD 999998 Scott Sans 273-20-5071-REFUND 07/31/2021 20211022 1,764.40 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 22 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465932 TOTAL: 1,764.40 465933 10/22/2021 PRTD 999998 Tricare For Life 273-21-1921-REFUND 07/22/2021 20211022 99.15 CHECK 465933 TOTAL: 99.15 465934 10/22/2021 PRTD 999998 UCARE 273-20-5280-REFUND 07/22/2021 20211022 163.28 CHECK 465934 TOTAL: 163.28 465935 10/22/2021 PRTD 999998 UCARE 273-21-1213-REFUND 07/22/2021 20211022 83.97 CHECK 465935 TOTAL: 83.97 465936 10/22/2021 PRTD 999998 VA - FSC 273-19-5709-REFUND 07/31/2021 20211022 2,007.37 CHECK 465936 TOTAL: 2,007.37 465937 10/22/2021 PRTD 999998 VA - FSC 273-20-1020-REFUND 07/22/2021 20211022 1,809.57 CHECK 465937 TOTAL: 1,809.57 465938 10/22/2021 PRTD 999995 Streeter Custom Builder ED175570-REFUND 10/14/2021 20211022 9,335.00 CHECK 465938 TOTAL: 9,335.00 465939 10/22/2021 PRTD 999995 TRINITY EXTERIORS, INC ED192962-REFUND 10/19/2021 20211022 24.00 CHECK 465939 TOTAL: 24.00 465940 10/22/2021 PRTD 129214 OUVERSON SEWER AND WATER INC 6429 08/23/2021 20211022 9,320.00 CHECK 465940 TOTAL: 9,320.00 465941 10/22/2021 PRTD 129485 PAPCO INC OP460507 09/03/2021 20211022 -358.09 PAPCO INC 222617 10/19/2021 20211022 369.58 CHECK 465941 TOTAL: 11.49 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 23 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465942 10/22/2021 PRTD 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 51594208 10/05/2021 20211022 259.38 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 49922609 10/01/2021 20211022 329.70 CHECK 465942 TOTAL: 589.08 465943 10/22/2021 PRTD 149249 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-119204 09/30/2021 20211022 495.50 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-118396 09/30/2021 20211022 170.00 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-119981 10/07/2021 20211022 137.00 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-119980 10/07/2021 20211022 628.50 CHECK 465943 TOTAL: 1,431.00 465944 10/22/2021 PRTD 160131 PER MAR SECURITY AND RESEARCH COR 2613218 09/23/2021 20211022 322.50 PER MAR SECURITY AND RESEARCH COR 2613222 09/23/2021 20211022 142.50 CHECK 465944 TOTAL: 465.00 465945 10/22/2021 PRTD 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 210552615 09/23/2021 20211022 180.00 CHECK 465945 TOTAL: 180.00 465946 10/22/2021 PRTD 125979 PRECISE MRM LLC 200-1032764 09/24/2021 20211022 125.00 PRECISE MRM LLC 200-1032875 09/27/2021 20211022 1,075.00 CHECK 465946 TOTAL: 1,200.00 465947 10/22/2021 PRTD 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC 318386369 09/30/2021 20211022 14.00 CHECK 465947 TOTAL: 14.00 465948 10/22/2021 PRTD 143618 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-28145 10/06/2021 20211022 382.00 CHECK 465948 TOTAL: 382.00 465949 10/22/2021 PRTD 100763 QUADIENT, INC N9060390 09/23/2021 20211022 454.05 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 24 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465949 TOTAL: 454.05 465950 10/22/2021 PRTD 138298 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION COMPANY INC K-00908664 10/04/2021 20211022 657.00 CHECK 465950 TOTAL: 657.00 465951 10/22/2021 PRTD 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 1928604098 09/27/2021 20211022 69.69 CHECK 465951 TOTAL: 69.69 465952 10/22/2021 PRTD 101659 ORKIN 215699503 09/21/2021 20211022 153.42 ORKIN 215701021 09/21/2021 20211022 30.00 ORKIN 215700951 09/23/2021 20211022 32.10 CHECK 465952 TOTAL: 215.52 465953 10/22/2021 PRTD 160055 SANDSTROM LAND MANAGEMENT 092521 09/25/2021 20211022 2,050.00 CHECK 465953 TOTAL: 2,050.00 465954 10/22/2021 PRTD 100991 SCHWAB VOLLHABER LUBRATT SERVICE 223540 09/23/2021 22100040 20211022 18,000.00 CHECK 465954 TOTAL: 18,000.00 465955 10/22/2021 PRTD 132210 RUSCIANO GROUP 67192 09/24/2021 20211022 755.00 CHECK 465955 TOTAL: 755.00 465956 10/22/2021 PRTD 151972 SHARPS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC EW00014041 11/19/2020 20211022 16.28 SHARPS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC 0002808717 08/31/2021 20211022 246.77 CHECK 465956 TOTAL: 263.05 465957 10/22/2021 PRTD 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP B14115872 09/27/2021 20211022 2,428.40 CHECK 465957 TOTAL: 2,428.40 465958 10/22/2021 PRTD 101556 SHRED-IT USA 800050217 09/25/2021 20211022 97.35 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 25 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 465958 TOTAL: 97.35 465959 10/22/2021 PRTD 120784 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 16534 09/21/2021 20211022 700.83 CHECK 465959 TOTAL: 700.83 465960 10/22/2021 PRTD 132195 SMALL LOT MN MN46416 10/05/2021 20211022 437.00 CHECK 465960 TOTAL: 437.00 465961 10/22/2021 PRTD 101000 RJM PRINTING INC 117817012 09/23/2021 20211022 103.52 RJM PRINTING INC 117790011 09/20/2021 20211022 54.36 CHECK 465961 TOTAL: 157.88 465962 10/22/2021 PRTD 140502 SOUTH METRO FIRE DEPARTMENT 26772 09/23/2021 20211022 5,664.00 CHECK 465962 TOTAL: 5,664.00 465963 10/22/2021 PRTD 127878 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2132741 10/06/2021 20211022 1,000.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 5075581 10/06/2021 20211022 865.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2132738 10/06/2021 20211022 307.75 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2132737 10/06/2021 20211022 290.40 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2132740 10/06/2021 20211022 2,776.55 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2132742 10/06/2021 20211022 290.40 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2132745 10/06/2021 20211022 524.00 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 5075582 10/06/2021 20211022 865.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2132748 10/06/2021 20211022 1,848.08 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2132746 10/06/2021 20211022 1,762.40 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2132743 10/06/2021 20211022 2,831.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2132747 10/06/2021 20211022 228.00 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2132744 10/06/2021 20211022 1,448.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2132736 10/06/2021 20211022 1,139.60 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 26 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 5075580 10/06/2021 20211022 865.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2132732 10/06/2021 20211022 96.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2132733 10/06/2021 20211022 239.30 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2132735 10/06/2021 20211022 1,723.25 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2132734 10/06/2021 20211022 509.25 CHECK 465963 TOTAL: 19,613.78 465964 10/22/2021 PRTD 139006 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION 00000673968 09/30/2021 20211022 1,920.00 CHECK 465964 TOTAL: 1,920.00 465965 10/22/2021 PRTD 139006 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION 19982 10/15/2021 20211022 400.00 CHECK 465965 TOTAL: 400.00 465966 10/22/2021 PRTD 139006 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES 00000672885 09/20/2021 20211022 17,937.00 CHECK 465966 TOTAL: 17,937.00 465967 10/22/2021 PRTD 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 42610 10/06/2021 20211022 495.00 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 42612 10/06/2021 20211022 174.00 CHECK 465967 TOTAL: 669.00 465968 10/22/2021 PRTD 101015 STREICHERS INC I1525635 09/22/2021 20211022 6,000.00 STREICHERS INC I1528466 10/08/2021 20211022 59.98 STREICHERS INC I1528271 10/07/2021 20211022 883.00 STREICHERS INC I1528964 10/12/2021 20211022 178.68 CHECK 465968 TOTAL: 7,121.66 465969 10/22/2021 PRTD 120700 TIGER OAK MEDIA INCORPORATED 2021-239137 09/27/2021 20211022 134.00 CHECK 465969 TOTAL: 134.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 27 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465970 10/22/2021 PRTD 134673 TOTAL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INC S1667 09/26/2021 20211022 229.00 CHECK 465970 TOTAL: 229.00 465971 10/22/2021 PRTD 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 131775 09/27/2021 20211022 840.00 CHECK 465971 TOTAL: 840.00 465972 10/22/2021 PRTD 104064 TRANS UNION LLC 09109803 09/25/2021 20211022 10.56 CHECK 465972 TOTAL: 10.56 465973 10/22/2021 PRTD 103218 TRI-STATE BOBCAT R32256 09/23/2021 20211022 2,550.00 CHECK 465973 TOTAL: 2,550.00 465974 10/22/2021 PRTD 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE COMPANY INC PSI2071442 09/27/2021 20211022 100.00 CHECK 465974 TOTAL: 100.00 465975 10/22/2021 PRTD 130874 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA) IN 197964115-001 09/14/2021 20211022 1,742.00 CHECK 465975 TOTAL: 1,742.00 465976 10/22/2021 PRTD 140009 US KIDS GOLF LLC IN2029435 09/27/2021 20211022 153.20 US KIDS GOLF LLC IN2028433-1 09/14/2021 20211022 -11.54 US KIDS GOLF LLC IN2028465-1 09/14/2021 20211022 -6.62 CHECK 465976 TOTAL: 135.04 465977 10/22/2021 PRTD 101058 VAN PAPER COMPANY 588199-00 09/22/2021 20211022 955.24 VAN PAPER COMPANY 588198-00 09/22/2021 20211022 85.63 VAN PAPER COMPANY 588192-00 09/22/2021 20211022 4.18 VAN PAPER COMPANY 588193-00 09/22/2021 20211022 472.46 VAN PAPER COMPANY 588196-00 09/22/2021 20211022 63.97 VAN PAPER COMPANY 588197-00 09/22/2021 20211022 785.94 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 28 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET VAN PAPER COMPANY 588196-01 09/23/2021 20211022 9.76 CHECK 465977 TOTAL: 2,377.18 465978 10/22/2021 PRTD 144209 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 2875 10/07/2021 20211022 183.00 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 2874 10/07/2021 20211022 273.00 VENN BREWING COMPANY LLC 2876 10/07/2021 20211022 186.00 CHECK 465978 TOTAL: 642.00 465979 10/22/2021 PRTD 148579 VIERKANT DISPOSAL LLC 8/1/21 - 8/31/21 09/09/2021 20211022 67,985.00 CHECK 465979 TOTAL: 67,985.00 465980 10/22/2021 PRTD 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S005100561.001 09/21/2021 20211022 29.79 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S005102087.001 09/22/2021 20211022 7.84 CHECK 465980 TOTAL: 37.63 465981 10/22/2021 PRTD 119454 VINOCOPIA INC 0287932-IN 10/01/2021 20211022 646.25 VINOCOPIA INC 0288305-IN 10/07/2021 20211022 100.25 VINOCOPIA INC 0288309-IN 10/07/2021 20211022 360.75 VINOCOPIA INC 0288311-IN 10/07/2021 20211022 153.25 VINOCOPIA INC 0288310-IN 10/07/2021 20211022 967.75 VINOCOPIA INC 0288312-IN 10/07/2021 20211022 127.50 VINOCOPIA INC 0288308-IN 10/07/2021 20211022 169.00 VINOCOPIA INC 0288307-IN 10/07/2021 20211022 310.25 VINOCOPIA INC 0288306-IN 10/07/2021 20211022 100.25 CHECK 465981 TOTAL: 2,935.25 465982 10/22/2021 PRTD 142351 WATCHGUARD VIDEO CMINV0001965 09/21/2021 20211022 1,185.00 CHECK 465982 TOTAL: 1,185.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 29 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465983 10/22/2021 PRTD 103219 WENDEL ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES IN 353698 09/21/2021 20211022 1,950.00 CHECK 465983 TOTAL: 1,950.00 465984 10/22/2021 PRTD 101033 WINE COMPANY 184623 10/01/2021 20211022 1,345.45 WINE COMPANY 184884 10/01/2021 20211022 460.95 WINE COMPANY 185255 10/06/2021 20211022 1,736.60 WINE COMPANY 185264 10/06/2021 20211022 2,820.30 CHECK 465984 TOTAL: 6,363.30 465985 10/22/2021 PRTD 124503 WINSUPPLY EDEN PRAIRIE MN CO 216840 01 09/21/2021 20211022 37.38 WINSUPPLY EDEN PRAIRIE MN CO 216861 01 09/21/2021 20211022 8.31 CHECK 465985 TOTAL: 45.69 465986 10/22/2021 PRTD 142162 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 2990 09/29/2021 20211022 349.50 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 2992 09/29/2021 20211022 250.80 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 2991 09/29/2021 20211022 131.40 CHECK 465986 TOTAL: 731.70 465987 10/22/2021 PRTD 127774 WORLDWIDE CELLARS INC R21-54193 10/06/2021 20211022 462.04 CHECK 465987 TOTAL: 462.04 465988 10/22/2021 PRTD 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES R-018610-000-1 08/31/2021 20211022 283.75 WSB & ASSOCIATES R-018641-000-1 09/22/2021 20211022 587.75 WSB & ASSOCIATES R-018642-000-1 09/22/2021 20211022 997.25 CHECK 465988 TOTAL: 1,868.75 465989 10/22/2021 PRTD 101091 ZIEGLER INC SI000076157 09/23/2021 20211022 303.03 CHECK 465989 TOTAL: 303.03 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/21/2021 12:34User: STanGeilProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 30 NUMBER OF CHECKS 179 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** 1,610,890.86 COUNT AMOUNT TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS 179 1,610,890.86 *** GRAND TOTAL *** 1,610,890.86 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 1 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 465990 10/29/2021 PRTD 151176 A&B CONSTRUCTION LTD PW 20-002 #Final 09/22/2021 20211029 5,559.10 CHECK 465990 TOTAL: 5,559.10 465991 10/29/2021 PRTD 104878 AA EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 14255 09/28/2021 20211029 7,335.00 CHECK 465991 TOTAL: 7,335.00 465992 10/29/2021 PRTD 129458 ACME ELECTRIC MOTOR INC 9180518 09/30/2021 20211029 179.98 CHECK 465992 TOTAL: 179.98 465993 10/29/2021 PRTD 129458 ACME ELECTRIC MOTOR INC 9179859 09/30/2021 20211029 516.42 ACME ELECTRIC MOTOR INC 9179873 09/30/2021 20211029 156.98 CHECK 465993 TOTAL: 673.40 465994 10/29/2021 PRTD 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 911912388 09/29/2021 20211029 264.17 CHECK 465994 TOTAL: 264.17 465995 10/29/2021 PRTD 130792 AIRGAS NATIONAL CARBONATION 9800801340 09/30/2021 20211029 480.00 CHECK 465995 TOTAL: 480.00 465996 10/29/2021 PRTD 120796 ALERUS RETIREMENT AND BENEFITS C114225 10/04/2021 20211029 254.00 CHECK 465996 TOTAL: 254.00 465997 10/29/2021 PRTD 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC 6335 09/29/2021 20211029 702.74 CHECK 465997 TOTAL: 702.74 465998 10/29/2021 PRTD 160095 AM CRAFT SPIRITS SALES & MARKETIN 13184 10/13/2021 20211029 32.62 CHECK 465998 TOTAL: 32.62 465999 10/29/2021 PRTD 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1FFX-7666-M36R 09/28/2021 20211029 417.76 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1L7L-YLX6-LR9T 09/28/2021 20211029 262.49 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 176G-TYDY-6V3X 09/28/2021 20211029 170.53 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 2 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1K1Y-DJKP-7M4Q 09/28/2021 20211029 50.92 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1XF4-X7RM-7WNP 09/28/2021 20211029 34.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1R74-NMCP-9NF4 09/28/2021 20211029 89.95 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 17LG-LRLG-QR4M 09/29/2021 20211029 89.99 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1V44-1GYJ-CTNL 09/30/2021 20211029 -20.88 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 13QL-FL7F-KL3H 10/01/2021 20211029 -50.92 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1KY9-TFYH-TJV9 10/01/2021 20211029 29.38 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1VDM-MDHW-Y3PH 10/02/2021 20211029 224.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1CLF-N3RV-3NNM 10/02/2021 20211029 52.39 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1PWV-3QPL-HJ4L 10/03/2021 20211029 20.42 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1N97-67CD-JQNP 10/04/2021 20211029 59.80 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1WPH-7DXK-MWNY 10/05/2021 20211029 236.52 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1NT3-T6FH-T1TN 10/05/2021 20211029 16.14 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1ND3-R61X-XGMQ 10/05/2021 20211029 31.69 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1VMH-KMT4-3413 10/05/2021 20211029 19.88 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 1LRJ-CQLP-KX94 10/18/2021 20211029 -52.87 CHECK 465999 TOTAL: 1,681.19 466000 10/29/2021 PRTD 118491 APPLE INC AG02765797 09/28/2021 20211029 1,448.00 CHECK 466000 TOTAL: 1,448.00 466001 10/29/2021 PRTD 135988 APPRIZE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC 20012102021 10/01/2021 20211029 1,111.80 CHECK 466001 TOTAL: 1,111.80 466002 10/29/2021 PRTD 151441 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 1005149810 09/22/2021 20211029 390.55 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 1005154859 09/29/2021 20211029 469.81 ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPEAL 1005158864 10/05/2021 20211029 178.13 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 3 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 466002 TOTAL: 1,038.49 466003 10/29/2021 PRTD 151756 ARBEITER BREWING COMPANY LLC 464 10/14/2021 20211029 156.00 CHECK 466003 TOTAL: 156.00 466004 10/29/2021 PRTD 106304 ASPEN MILLS INC CM4378 08/31/2021 20211029 -219.00 ASPEN MILLS INC 279941 09/03/2021 20211029 93.95 ASPEN MILLS INC 280846 09/21/2021 20211029 66.00 ASPEN MILLS INC 281304 09/29/2021 20211029 59.85 ASPEN MILLS INC 281583 10/04/2021 20211029 332.80 ASPEN MILLS INC 281578 10/04/2021 20211029 103.95 ASPEN MILLS INC 276927 07/26/2021 22100014 20211029 13,016.30 CHECK 466004 TOTAL: 13,453.85 466005 10/29/2021 PRTD 129624 BARNA GUZY & STEFFEN LTD 236508 09/30/2021 20211029 1,322.00 CHECK 466005 TOTAL: 1,322.00 466006 10/29/2021 PRTD 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23271827.01-9 10/01/2021 20211029 572.50 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23271799.00-12 10/01/2021 20211029 14,784.00 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23271891.00-1 10/04/2021 20211029 1,415.50 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23271869.00-5 10/04/2021 20211029 63,423.10 BARR ENGINEERING CO 23271892.00-1 10/04/2021 20211029 872.00 CHECK 466006 TOTAL: 81,067.10 466007 10/29/2021 PRTD 102709 BDS LAUNDRY SYSTEMS LMV414330 09/10/2021 20211029 281.95 BDS LAUNDRY SYSTEMS SOI0185737 09/21/2021 20211029 554.43 CHECK 466007 TOTAL: 836.38 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 4 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 466008 10/29/2021 PRTD 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0091687200 10/07/2021 20211029 3,133.75 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0091748300 10/14/2021 20211029 89.55 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0091755100 10/14/2021 20211029 2,153.10 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0091747700 10/14/2021 20211029 834.95 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0104081400 10/14/2021 20211029 78.86 BELLBOY CORPORATION 0091755300 10/14/2021 20211029 3,675.25 CHECK 466008 TOTAL: 9,965.46 466009 10/29/2021 PRTD 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC 157048 10/01/2021 20211029 884.87 CHECK 466009 TOTAL: 884.87 466010 10/29/2021 PRTD 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 14724 10/13/2021 20211029 243.00 BLACK STACK BREWING INC 14725 10/13/2021 20211029 262.00 CHECK 466010 TOTAL: 505.00 466011 10/29/2021 PRTD 124534 BLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS LLC 2199-032 09/29/2021 20211029 13,574.00 CHECK 466011 TOTAL: 13,574.00 466012 10/29/2021 PRTD 124534 BLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS LLC 2199-033 09/29/2021 20211029 5,984.90 CHECK 466012 TOTAL: 5,984.90 466013 10/29/2021 PRTD 125268 BLUE COMPACTOR SERVICES LLC 10007 10/04/2021 20211029 386.00 CHECK 466013 TOTAL: 386.00 466014 10/29/2021 PRTD 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC 0276904 09/30/2021 20211029 1,664.00 BOLTON & MENK INC 0276905 09/30/2021 20211029 1,093.50 BOLTON & MENK INC 0273452 07/29/2021 20211029 1,060.00 CHECK 466014 TOTAL: 3,817.50 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 5 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 466015 10/29/2021 PRTD 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84212799 09/17/2021 20211029 254.40 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84228855 09/28/2021 20211029 152.99 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 84228856 09/28/2021 20211029 1,263.94 CHECK 466015 TOTAL: 1,671.33 466016 10/29/2021 PRTD 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 181563 10/13/2021 20211029 754.50 BOURGET IMPORTS 181591 10/13/2021 20211029 951.73 BOURGET IMPORTS 181564 10/13/2021 20211029 263.50 CHECK 466016 TOTAL: 1,969.73 466017 10/29/2021 PRTD 117040 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC 005P7266 09/28/2021 20211029 33.77 CHECK 466017 TOTAL: 33.77 466018 10/29/2021 PRTD 142566 BRASS FOUNDRY BREWING CO E-7315 10/13/2021 20211029 128.00 CHECK 466018 TOTAL: 128.00 466019 10/29/2021 PRTD 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341394293 10/13/2021 20211029 869.53 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341394292 10/13/2021 20211029 1,633.25 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341394294 10/13/2021 20211029 3,046.55 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341394310 10/13/2021 20211029 181.34 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341394313 10/13/2021 20211029 1,690.95 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341394311 10/13/2021 20211029 1,324.65 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341394312 10/13/2021 20211029 197.90 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341394314 10/13/2021 20211029 3,113.00 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341394315 10/13/2021 20211029 2,608.36 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE 341394316 10/13/2021 20211029 77.15 CHECK 466019 TOTAL: 14,742.68 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 6 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 466020 10/29/2021 PRTD 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 341326193 10/05/2021 20211029 5,084.15 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 341326201 10/05/2021 20211029 8,622.15 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 341393482 10/14/2021 20211029 1,865.20 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 341393483 10/12/2021 20211029 138.50 CHECK 466020 TOTAL: 15,710.00 466021 10/29/2021 PRTD 100648 BERTELSON BROTHERS INC WO-1149927-1 10/04/2021 20211029 96.91 CHECK 466021 TOTAL: 96.91 466022 10/29/2021 PRTD 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 933788898 09/09/2021 20211029 439.20 CALLAWAY GOLF 933788896 09/09/2021 20211029 109.80 CHECK 466022 TOTAL: 549.00 466023 10/29/2021 PRTD 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON PA 09-2021-2851 09/30/2021 20211029 14,865.28 CHECK 466023 TOTAL: 14,865.28 466024 10/29/2021 PRTD 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2605785 10/08/2021 20211029 351.00 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2605784 10/08/2021 20211029 45.98 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2605773 10/08/2021 20211029 3,119.40 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2605777 10/08/2021 20211029 224.50 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2605775 10/08/2021 20211029 175.50 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2606603 10/12/2021 20211029 4,037.95 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2606602 10/12/2021 20211029 110.97 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2606601 10/12/2021 20211029 375.00 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 19600047 10/11/2021 20211029 -54.00 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2608580 10/15/2021 20211029 58.50 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2608581 10/15/2021 20211029 36.99 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES LP 2608582 10/15/2021 20211029 1,527.20 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 7 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 466024 TOTAL: 10,008.99 466025 10/29/2021 PRTD 160207 JASON THOMAS CARDINAL EPD2021-2 09/28/2021 20211029 400.00 CHECK 466025 TOTAL: 400.00 466026 10/29/2021 PRTD 144675 CARLOS CREEK WINERY INC 22026 10/11/2021 20211029 72.00 CHECK 466026 TOTAL: 72.00 466027 10/29/2021 PRTD 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY C2423859 09/28/2021 20211029 1,015.00 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY C2425035 09/29/2021 20211029 1,160.00 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY C2427387 10/01/2021 20211029 1,204.80 CHECK 466027 TOTAL: 3,379.80 466028 10/29/2021 PRTD 142533 CADD ENGR SUPPLY INC INV132258 09/29/2021 20211029 279.00 CHECK 466028 TOTAL: 279.00 466029 10/29/2021 PRTD 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 4097163989 09/28/2021 20211029 49.01 CINTAS CORPORATION 4097164073 09/28/2021 20211029 11.78 CINTAS CORPORATION 4097164039 09/28/2021 20211029 37.28 CINTAS CORPORATION 4097164041 09/28/2021 20211029 33.05 CINTAS CORPORATION 4097163975 09/28/2021 20211029 23.14 CINTAS CORPORATION 4097667249 10/04/2021 20211029 17.52 CINTAS CORPORATION 4097667284 10/04/2021 20211029 52.53 CINTAS CORPORATION 4097830609 10/05/2021 20211029 34.88 CINTAS CORPORATION 4097830702 10/05/2021 20211029 11.78 CINTAS CORPORATION 4097830723 10/05/2021 20211029 33.05 CINTAS CORPORATION 4097830665 10/05/2021 20211029 23.14 CINTAS CORPORATION 4097830551 10/05/2021 20211029 49.01 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 8 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CINTAS CORPORATION 4098233632 10/08/2021 20211029 81.48 CINTAS CORPORATION 4098351930 10/11/2021 20211029 10.69 CHECK 466029 TOTAL: 468.34 466030 10/29/2021 PRTD 101837 CITY OF EDINA 24889-MNTF1 09/22/2021 20211029 4,321.85 CHECK 466030 TOTAL: 4,321.85 466031 10/29/2021 PRTD 146472 CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE OF MN 42009001761 09/30/2021 20211029 756.00 CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE OF MN 42009001762 09/30/2021 20211029 756.00 CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE OF MN 42009001771 09/30/2021 20211029 535.00 CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE OF MN 32009004051 10/01/2021 20211029 3,372.25 CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE OF MN 32009004132 10/01/2021 20211029 3,840.00 CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE OF MN 32009004272 10/01/2021 20211029 1,395.00 CHECK 466031 TOTAL: 10,654.25 466032 10/29/2021 PRTD 145926 CLEARWATER ANALYTICS LLC 525963 10/04/2021 20211029 821.92 CHECK 466032 TOTAL: 821.92 466033 10/29/2021 PRTD 120433 COMCAST HOLDINGS CORPORATION 0023973-10/21 10/03/2021 20211029 9.00 CHECK 466033 TOTAL: 9.00 466034 10/29/2021 PRTD 105981 TILLER CORPORATION 210930 09/30/2021 20211029 106,043.34 CHECK 466034 TOTAL: 106,043.34 466035 10/29/2021 PRTD 104928 SMITH CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC 23388 10/01/2021 20211029 106.45 CHECK 466035 TOTAL: 106.45 466036 10/29/2021 PRTD 100012 CORE & MAIN P673315 09/29/2021 20211029 30.02 CHECK 466036 TOTAL: 30.02 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 9 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 466037 10/29/2021 PRTD 140999 CORE-MARK MIDCONTINENT INC 8418971 10/01/2021 20211029 584.40 CHECK 466037 TOTAL: 584.40 466038 10/29/2021 PRTD 160189 COYLE, ANN 1009 10/01/2021 20211029 1,095.00 CHECK 466038 TOTAL: 1,095.00 466039 10/29/2021 PRTD 160115 CREATING ART INC. 1235 10/01/2021 20211029 231.00 CHECK 466039 TOTAL: 231.00 466040 10/29/2021 PRTD 142772 CREATIVE ARCADE 1206 10/01/2021 20211029 950.00 CHECK 466040 TOTAL: 950.00 466041 10/29/2021 PRTD 122132 CREATIVE PRODUCT SOURCING INC 141348 09/28/2021 20211029 169.35 CHECK 466041 TOTAL: 169.35 466042 10/29/2021 PRTD 100699 CULLIGAN SOFTWATER SERVICE COMPAN 114X82652005 09/30/2021 20211029 162.63 CULLIGAN SOFTWATER SERVICE COMPAN 114X82718905 09/30/2021 20211029 513.18 CHECK 466042 TOTAL: 675.81 466043 10/29/2021 PRTD 102514 CUTTER & BUCK INC 95792898 10/05/2021 20211029 68.76 CHECK 466043 TOTAL: 68.76 466044 10/29/2021 PRTD 133169 DAIKIN APPLIED 3323154 10/01/2021 20211029 1,794.00 CHECK 466044 TOTAL: 1,794.00 466045 10/29/2021 PRTD 104020 DALCO ENTERPRISES INC 3837363 09/29/2021 20211029 1,165.62 DALCO ENTERPRISES INC 3839769 10/05/2021 20211029 616.70 CHECK 466045 TOTAL: 1,782.32 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 10 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 466046 10/29/2021 PRTD 102195 DAY INVESTMENTS LLC P44322628 10/04/2021 20211029 428.15 CHECK 466046 TOTAL: 428.15 466047 10/29/2021 PRTD 118189 DEM-CON COMPANIES LLC 8962 09/30/2021 20211029 216.76 CHECK 466047 TOTAL: 216.76 466048 10/29/2021 PRTD 123995 DICKS SANITATION INC DT0004188157 09/30/2021 20211029 723.85 CHECK 466048 TOTAL: 723.85 466049 10/29/2021 PRTD 160060 DOMACE VINO LLC 23312 10/05/2021 20211029 422.50 CHECK 466049 TOTAL: 422.50 466050 10/29/2021 PRTD 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 855846 09/30/2021 20211029 119.00 CHECK 466050 TOTAL: 119.00 466051 10/29/2021 PRTD 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC 0071956-IN 10/04/2021 20211029 3,361.38 CHECK 466051 TOTAL: 3,361.38 466052 10/29/2021 PRTD 137540 EMSL ANALYTICAL INC 87364043 02/22/2021 20211029 11.11 CHECK 466052 TOTAL: 11.11 466053 10/29/2021 PRTD 145077 ENVIRONMENTAL TREE AND DESIGN INC 27612 10/12/2021 20211029 4,050.00 CHECK 466053 TOTAL: 4,050.00 466054 10/29/2021 PRTD 134730 EXPLORE EDINA 26933 10/18/2021 20211029 45,820.31 CHECK 466054 TOTAL: 45,820.31 466055 10/29/2021 PRTD 100146 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-Z27091 10/05/2021 20211029 153.32 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-430073 09/30/2021 20211029 42.88 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-7179045 10/05/2021 20211029 626.24 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 11 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-430414 10/04/2021 20211029 19.74 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 69-429887 09/29/2021 20211029 27.70 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-7167665 09/29/2021 20211029 28.25 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 158-058387 09/29/2021 20211029 6.56 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC 1-7167643 09/29/2021 20211029 8.68 CHECK 466055 TOTAL: 913.37 466056 10/29/2021 PRTD 147181 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-4699 10/12/2021 20211029 390.00 FALLING BREWERY - BERGMAN LEDGE L E-4698 10/12/2021 20211029 180.00 CHECK 466056 TOTAL: 570.00 466057 10/29/2021 PRTD 137583 FER-PAL CONSTRUCTION USA LLC ENG 21-7 #2 10/04/2021 20211029 48,824.48 CHECK 466057 TOTAL: 48,824.48 466058 10/29/2021 PRTD 103600 FERGUSON US HOLDINGS INC 0478396 09/28/2021 20211029 577.11 CHECK 466058 TOTAL: 577.11 466059 10/29/2021 PRTD 141837 DAIOHS USA INC 572657 09/20/2021 20211029 435.75 DAIOHS USA INC 574282 10/04/2021 20211029 272.80 DAIOHS USA INC 574288 10/04/2021 20211029 619.95 CHECK 466059 TOTAL: 1,328.50 466060 10/29/2021 PRTD 160036 FIRST HOSPITAL LABORATORIES, INC. FL00473619 10/04/2021 20211029 447.95 CHECK 466060 TOTAL: 447.95 466061 10/29/2021 PRTD 126444 KIRK STENSRUD ENTERPRISES INC 2315-43434 10/01/2021 20211029 990.00 CHECK 466061 TOTAL: 990.00 466062 10/29/2021 PRTD 136583 FLUID INTERIORS LLC 30985 - Deposit 10/26/2021 20211029 4,469.06 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 12 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 466062 TOTAL: 4,469.06 466063 10/29/2021 PRTD 122414 FORKLIFTS OF MINNESOTA INC 01P8681420 09/29/2021 20211029 26.20 CHECK 466063 TOTAL: 26.20 466064 10/29/2021 PRTD 104716 GALE-TEC ENGINEERING INC 3142 10/01/2021 20211029 2,105.90 CHECK 466064 TOTAL: 2,105.90 466065 10/29/2021 PRTD 102456 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1455579 09/30/2021 20211029 35.00 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1455523 09/30/2021 20211029 652.00 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1456002 09/30/2021 20211029 99.80 GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC BC1458004 10/04/2021 20211029 34.50 CHECK 466065 TOTAL: 821.30 466066 10/29/2021 PRTD 151316 GARDENEER 31813 09/30/2021 20211029 1,414.29 CHECK 466066 TOTAL: 1,414.29 466067 10/29/2021 PRTD 146848 GHELLER MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC 21GMG10-023 10/05/2021 20211029 600.00 CHECK 466067 TOTAL: 600.00 466068 10/29/2021 PRTD 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 1090360 09/30/2021 20211029 1,451.25 CHECK 466068 TOTAL: 1,451.25 466069 10/29/2021 PRTD 101103 WW GRAINGER 9067369810 09/28/2021 20211029 566.72 WW GRAINGER 9068952911 09/28/2021 20211029 61.53 WW GRAINGER 9070370102 09/29/2021 20211029 85.35 WW GRAINGER 9069256999 09/29/2021 20211029 5.64 WW GRAINGER 9069257005 09/29/2021 20211029 207.94 WW GRAINGER 9073933419 10/04/2021 20211029 18.47 WW GRAINGER 9074593527 10/04/2021 20211029 45.54 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 13 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 466069 TOTAL: 991.19 466070 10/29/2021 PRTD 144412 WINEBOW MN00102051 10/13/2021 20211029 1,120.00 WINEBOW MN00102052 10/13/2021 20211029 480.00 WINEBOW MN00102053 10/13/2021 20211029 540.00 WINEBOW MN00102054 10/13/2021 20211029 410.00 WINEBOW MN00102055 10/13/2021 20211029 168.00 WINEBOW MN00102063 10/13/2021 20211029 2,105.50 WINEBOW MN00102064 10/13/2021 20211029 489.00 WINEBOW MN00102057 10/13/2021 20211029 2,578.02 WINEBOW MN00102058 10/13/2021 20211029 480.00 WINEBOW MN00102059 10/13/2021 20211029 104.00 WINEBOW MN00102060 10/13/2021 20211029 327.00 WINEBOW MN00102056 10/13/2021 20211029 336.00 WINEBOW MN00101732 10/07/2021 20211029 -53.08 WINEBOW MN00100158 09/08/2021 20211029 -4.00 CHECK 466070 TOTAL: 9,080.44 466071 10/29/2021 PRTD 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 9323601457 09/29/2021 20211029 108.87 CHECK 466071 TOTAL: 108.87 466072 10/29/2021 PRTD 151286 GRAYSHIFT LLC INV-3742-1 09/30/2021 20211029 5,135.56 CHECK 466072 TOTAL: 5,135.56 466073 10/29/2021 PRTD 160108 GREAT RIVER OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC. 2106569-0 09/28/2021 20211029 53.54 GREAT RIVER OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC. 2106725-0 10/01/2021 20211029 46.17 GREAT RIVER OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC. C2106788-0 10/03/2021 20211029 -17.99 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 14 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 466073 TOTAL: 81.72 466074 10/29/2021 PRTD 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC 2-276767 09/13/2021 20211029 22.68 HAAG COMPANIES INC 2-277884 09/29/2021 20211029 206.40 HAAG COMPANIES INC 2-275930 09/02/2021 20211029 505.00 CHECK 466074 TOTAL: 734.08 466075 10/29/2021 PRTD 150691 HALLMARK CLEANERS 208160-093021 09/30/2021 20211029 3,069.98 HALLMARK CLEANERS 208160-083121 08/31/2021 20211029 3,561.25 CHECK 466075 TOTAL: 6,631.23 466076 10/29/2021 PRTD 151168 HAMMER SPORTS LLC 700 10/03/2021 20211029 118.00 CHECK 466076 TOTAL: 118.00 466077 10/29/2021 PRTD 101503 HCT 27328 10/20/2021 20211029 25.50 CHECK 466077 TOTAL: 25.50 466078 10/29/2021 PRTD 101503 HCT 27329 10/20/2021 20211029 3,941.53 CHECK 466078 TOTAL: 3,941.53 466079 10/29/2021 PRTD 103085 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000172154 09/30/2021 20211029 2,073.53 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000172292 10/01/2021 20211029 174.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000172261 10/01/2021 20211029 145.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000172381 10/04/2021 20211029 1,816.70 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000172337 10/04/2021 20211029 3,117.85 HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTING SERVIC 1000171006 09/02/2021 20211029 2,209.50 CHECK 466079 TOTAL: 9,536.58 466080 10/29/2021 PRTD 143585 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 70563 09/30/2021 20211029 3,136.14 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 15 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 466080 TOTAL: 3,136.14 466081 10/29/2021 PRTD 115377 METRO FURNITURE SOLUTIONS BY HENR 719704 09/30/2021 20211029 90.00 CHECK 466081 TOTAL: 90.00 466082 10/29/2021 PRTD 102484 HIRSHFIELDS PAINT MANUFACTURING I 0012657-IN 09/30/2021 20211029 437.04 CHECK 466082 TOTAL: 437.04 466083 10/29/2021 PRTD 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC 449930 10/12/2021 20211029 609.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 449797 10/11/2021 20211029 -33.38 HOHENSTEINS INC 449923 10/12/2021 20211029 50.40 HOHENSTEINS INC 449924 10/12/2021 20211029 285.00 HOHENSTEINS INC 449932 10/12/2021 20211029 1,825.50 CHECK 466083 TOTAL: 2,736.52 466084 10/29/2021 PRTD 129508 IMPACT MAILING OF MINNESOTA INC 154926 09/30/2021 20211029 1,267.05 CHECK 466084 TOTAL: 1,267.05 466085 10/29/2021 PRTD 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 106180 10/12/2021 20211029 614.80 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 106181 10/12/2021 20211029 1,006.05 INDEED BREWING COMPANY MN LLC 106178 10/12/2021 20211029 219.10 CHECK 466085 TOTAL: 1,839.95 466086 10/29/2021 PRTD 146407 INGCO INTERNATIONAL 600650 10/04/2021 20211029 1,000.00 CHECK 466086 TOTAL: 1,000.00 466087 10/29/2021 PRTD 150898 INVICTUS BREWING INC 3616 10/11/2021 20211029 124.00 INVICTUS BREWING INC 3615 10/11/2021 20211029 124.00 CHECK 466087 TOTAL: 248.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 16 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 466088 10/29/2021 PRTD 100828 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC 09-2021 09/30/2021 20211029 32.61 CHECK 466088 TOTAL: 32.61 466089 10/29/2021 PRTD 100828 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC PARKS MAINT-9/21 09/25/2021 20211029 256.08 JERRY'S ENTERPRISES INC FIRE-9/2021 09/25/2021 20211029 138.48 CHECK 466089 TOTAL: 394.56 466090 10/29/2021 PRTD 102146 JESSEN PRESS INC 687775 09/30/2021 20211029 516.00 JESSEN PRESS INC 687832 09/30/2021 20211029 3,008.00 CHECK 466090 TOTAL: 3,524.00 466091 10/29/2021 PRTD 132592 JF AHERN CO 463174 09/29/2021 20211029 2,351.92 CHECK 466091 TOTAL: 2,351.92 466092 10/29/2021 PRTD 100741 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3236480 10/13/2021 20211029 109.50 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3236490 10/13/2021 20211029 3,817.95 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3236492 10/13/2021 20211029 214.50 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3236491 10/13/2021 20211029 3,848.59 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3236488 10/13/2021 20211029 2,243.55 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF MINN 3236489 10/13/2021 20211029 83.10 CHECK 466092 TOTAL: 10,317.19 466093 10/29/2021 PRTD 100835 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3501662 10/14/2021 20211029 2,588.30 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3501660 10/14/2021 20211029 203.75 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3501661 10/14/2021 20211029 53.50 CHECK 466093 TOTAL: 2,845.55 466094 10/29/2021 PRTD 100835 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6283467 10/07/2021 20211029 5,392.59 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6287396 10/14/2021 20211029 874.71 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 17 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6287393 10/14/2021 20211029 298.84 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6287395 10/14/2021 20211029 1,907.85 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6287394 10/14/2021 20211029 654.57 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6287392 10/14/2021 20211029 1,934.35 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6287391 10/14/2021 20211029 68.69 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6287384 10/14/2021 20211029 104.69 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6287385 10/14/2021 20211029 1,106.96 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6287386 10/14/2021 20211029 110.38 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6287387 10/14/2021 20211029 1,780.66 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6287389 10/14/2021 20211029 480.57 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6287390 10/14/2021 20211029 162.38 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6287388 10/14/2021 20211029 97.19 CHECK 466094 TOTAL: 14,974.43 466095 10/29/2021 PRTD 100835 WINE MERCHANTS 7350083 10/08/2021 20211029 1,382.50 WINE MERCHANTS 739726 09/27/2021 20211029 -232.44 WINE MERCHANTS 7350906 10/14/2021 20211029 971.90 WINE MERCHANTS 7350909 10/14/2021 20211029 96.76 WINE MERCHANTS 7350910 10/14/2021 20211029 2,698.48 WINE MERCHANTS 7350908 10/14/2021 20211029 1,624.15 CHECK 466095 TOTAL: 6,541.35 466096 10/29/2021 PRTD 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1909681 10/14/2021 20211029 1,631.33 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1909678 10/14/2021 20211029 362.58 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1909688 10/14/2021 20211029 1,915.91 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1909682 10/14/2021 20211029 1,261.73 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1909689 10/14/2021 20211029 611.90 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 18 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1909684 10/14/2021 20211029 400.65 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1909683 10/14/2021 20211029 2,017.88 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1909687 10/14/2021 20211029 1,281.15 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1909686 10/14/2021 20211029 1,447.43 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1909685 10/14/2021 20211029 2,829.08 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1909665 10/14/2021 20211029 212.19 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1909669 10/14/2021 20211029 1,351.19 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1909660 10/14/2021 20211029 486.21 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1909663 10/14/2021 20211029 1,631.33 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1909662 10/14/2021 20211029 267.10 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1909664 10/14/2021 20211029 667.51 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1909667 10/14/2021 20211029 1,351.19 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1909670 10/14/2021 20211029 4,801.66 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1909674 10/14/2021 20211029 484.76 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1909675 10/14/2021 20211029 207.38 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1909676 10/14/2021 20211029 1,610.71 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1909677 10/14/2021 20211029 361.97 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1909680 10/14/2021 20211029 710.05 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 1909661 10/14/2021 20211029 852.26 CHECK 466096 TOTAL: 28,755.15 466097 10/29/2021 PRTD 142504 JOHNSON CONTROLS FIRE PROTECTION 22549856 10/01/2021 20211029 616.09 CHECK 466097 TOTAL: 616.09 466098 10/29/2021 PRTD 160180 JOSEPH ELLIOTT USA LLC 11698 10/01/2021 20211029 23.00 CHECK 466098 TOTAL: 23.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 19 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 466099 10/29/2021 PRTD 103409 KELBRO COMPANY 2683692 10/07/2021 20211029 107.92 KELBRO COMPANY 2685840 10/14/2021 20211029 41.64 CHECK 466099 TOTAL: 149.56 466100 10/29/2021 PRTD 105606 KELLINGTON CONSTRUCTION INC 2107900001 06/08/2021 20211029 4,773.00 KELLINGTON CONSTRUCTION INC 2107900002 06/09/2021 20211029 4,076.00 CHECK 466100 TOTAL: 8,849.00 466101 10/29/2021 PRTD 113212 KENDELL INTERMEDIATE CORPORATION IN039243 10/04/2021 20211029 475.00 CHECK 466101 TOTAL: 475.00 466102 10/29/2021 PRTD 160105 KILLMER ELECTRIC CO., INC. W16606 10/01/2021 20211029 600.44 CHECK 466102 TOTAL: 600.44 466103 10/29/2021 PRTD 124002 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 19858954 09/30/2021 20211029 5,295.00 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 19858956 09/30/2021 20211029 950.00 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 19839201 09/30/2021 20211029 6,697.02 CHECK 466103 TOTAL: 12,942.02 466104 10/29/2021 PRTD 100944 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 142681 10/12/2021 20211029 1,203.50 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 142684 10/12/2021 20211029 858.75 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 142665 10/12/2021 20211029 41.25 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 142680 10/12/2021 20211029 1,880.75 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC 142691 10/12/2021 20211029 607.50 CHECK 466104 TOTAL: 4,591.75 466105 10/29/2021 PRTD 151024 LA DONA SBC 5050 10/13/2021 20211029 114.00 CHECK 466105 TOTAL: 114.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 20 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 466106 10/29/2021 PRTD 116876 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 10349036 09/30/2021 20211029 1.20 CHECK 466106 TOTAL: 1.20 466107 10/29/2021 PRTD 101220 LANO EQUIPMENT INC 01-865104 09/30/2021 20211029 110.98 CHECK 466107 TOTAL: 110.98 466108 10/29/2021 PRTD 138280 LAURSEN PIANO SERVICE 25630 09/30/2021 20211029 110.00 CHECK 466108 TOTAL: 110.00 466109 10/29/2021 PRTD 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 9308862342 09/30/2021 20211029 1,204.72 CHECK 466109 TOTAL: 1,204.72 466110 10/29/2021 PRTD 134957 LEACH LAW OFFICE LLC 0656.001-9/2021 09/30/2021 20211029 21,670.37 CHECK 466110 TOTAL: 21,670.37 466111 10/29/2021 PRTD 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 40001670-2021 10/12/2021 20211029 10,181.00 CHECK 466111 TOTAL: 10,181.00 466112 10/29/2021 PRTD 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 1003628-10/2021 10/01/2021 20211029 1,640.99 CHECK 466112 TOTAL: 1,640.99 466113 10/29/2021 PRTD 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 1003628-10/2021 #2 10/01/2021 20211029 1,685.24 CHECK 466113 TOTAL: 1,685.24 466114 10/29/2021 PRTD 135867 LIBATION PROJECT 39702 10/12/2021 20211029 157.50 LIBATION PROJECT 39704 10/12/2021 20211029 235.00 LIBATION PROJECT 39699 10/12/2021 20211029 129.50 CHECK 466114 TOTAL: 522.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 21 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 466115 10/29/2021 PRTD 144426 LIFE LINE BILLING SYSTEMS LLC 58440 09/30/2021 20211029 758.58 LIFE LINE BILLING SYSTEMS LLC 58439 09/30/2021 20211029 7,544.95 CHECK 466115 TOTAL: 8,303.53 466116 10/29/2021 PRTD 100858 LOGIS 50962 10/01/2021 20211029 31,932.00 LOGIS 51025 09/30/2021 20211029 2,593.75 LOGIS 51058 09/30/2021 20211029 80.87 CHECK 466116 TOTAL: 34,606.62 466117 10/29/2021 PRTD 139443 LOOP1 SYSTEMS INC 23092 09/24/2021 20211029 5,995.00 LOOP1 SYSTEMS INC 23093 09/24/2021 20211029 5,528.85 CHECK 466117 TOTAL: 11,523.85 466118 10/29/2021 PRTD 146427 LUCID BREWING LLC 12118 10/13/2021 20211029 142.00 CHECK 466118 TOTAL: 142.00 466119 10/29/2021 PRTD 141916 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY 40761 10/12/2021 20211029 240.70 CHECK 466119 TOTAL: 240.70 466120 10/29/2021 PRTD 123848 LVC COMPANIES INC 71093 09/30/2021 20211029 125.21 CHECK 466120 TOTAL: 125.21 466121 10/29/2021 PRTD 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT LLC P37511 09/29/2021 20211029 68.18 CHECK 466121 TOTAL: 68.18 466122 10/29/2021 PRTD 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 22646532 10/04/2021 20211029 17,199.20 CHECK 466122 TOTAL: 17,199.20 466123 10/29/2021 PRTD 100869 MARTIN-MCALLISTER CONSULTING PSYC 14180 09/30/2021 20211029 4,200.00 MARTIN-MCALLISTER CONSULTING PSYC 14179 09/30/2021 20211029 2,200.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 22 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 466123 TOTAL: 6,400.00 466124 10/29/2021 PRTD 122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA J 263 09/30/2021 20211029 730.00 CHECK 466124 TOTAL: 730.00 466125 10/29/2021 PRTD 122554 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC 0024267536 09/28/2021 20211029 390.05 CHECK 466125 TOTAL: 390.05 466126 10/29/2021 PRTD 142349 MAX TREE FARM 1721-2nd Final 05/21/2021 20211029 1,600.00 CHECK 466126 TOTAL: 1,600.00 466127 10/29/2021 PRTD 119992 MCCARTHY WELL COMPANY 29348 10/04/2021 20211029 310.00 CHECK 466127 TOTAL: 310.00 466128 10/29/2021 PRTD 130477 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 602228 10/13/2021 20211029 52.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 602229 10/13/2021 20211029 675.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 602231 10/13/2021 20211029 42.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 602230 10/13/2021 20211029 454.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 602226 10/13/2021 20211029 230.00 MCDONALD DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 602227 10/13/2021 20211029 96.00 CHECK 466128 TOTAL: 1,549.00 466129 10/29/2021 PRTD 101483 MENARDS INC 47590 09/29/2021 20211029 5.88 MENARDS INC 47610 09/29/2021 20211029 7.76 MENARDS INC 47621 09/29/2021 20211029 40.13 MENARDS INC 47718 09/30/2021 20211029 163.44 MENARDS INC 47912 10/04/2021 20211029 54.90 MENARDS INC 47911 10/04/2021 20211029 32.97 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 23 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 466129 TOTAL: 305.08 466130 10/29/2021 PRTD 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD LLC 525713 10/04/2021 20211029 413.16 METROPOLITAN FORD LLC 400264 10/04/2021 20211029 119.95 CHECK 466130 TOTAL: 533.11 466131 10/29/2021 PRTD 138732 TRADITION WINE & SPIRITS LLC 28580 10/12/2021 20211029 326.00 TRADITION WINE & SPIRITS LLC 28579 10/12/2021 20211029 165.00 TRADITION WINE & SPIRITS LLC 28587 10/12/2021 20211029 940.00 CHECK 466131 TOTAL: 1,431.00 466132 10/29/2021 PRTD 104650 MICRO CENTER 8899813 10/04/2021 20211029 49.99 CHECK 466132 TOTAL: 49.99 466133 10/29/2021 PRTD 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY INC 44117 10/01/2021 20211029 1,002.40 CHECK 466133 TOTAL: 1,002.40 466134 10/29/2021 PRTD 145395 MILK AND HONEY LLC 9298 10/13/2021 20211029 198.00 CHECK 466134 TOTAL: 198.00 466135 10/29/2021 PRTD 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 00082818 09/30/2021 20211029 81.54 CHECK 466135 TOTAL: 81.54 466136 10/29/2021 PRTD 127062 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENANCE IN 180189866 10/03/2021 20211029 6.45 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENANCE IN 180189868 10/03/2021 20211029 18.28 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENANCE IN 180189867 10/03/2021 20211029 24.73 CHECK 466136 TOTAL: 49.46 466137 10/29/2021 PRTD 100889 MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION INC 511451 09/30/2021 20211029 700.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 24 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 466137 TOTAL: 700.00 466138 10/29/2021 PRTD 100252 MINNESOTA HIGHWAY SAFETY AND RESE 337900-8913 10/21/2021 20211029 910.00 CHECK 466138 TOTAL: 910.00 466139 10/29/2021 PRTD 128914 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 31834 09/30/2021 20211029 48.03 BJKK DEVELOPMENT 31828 09/29/2021 20211029 78.00 CHECK 466139 TOTAL: 126.03 466140 10/29/2021 PRTD 138171 MOBOTREX INC 253609 09/24/2021 22100043 20211029 14,160.00 CHECK 466140 TOTAL: 14,160.00 466141 10/29/2021 PRTD 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC E-25895 10/12/2021 20211029 279.00 MODIST BREWING LLC E-25894 10/12/2021 20211029 244.09 CHECK 466141 TOTAL: 523.09 466142 10/29/2021 PRTD 100916 MOOD MEDIA 56399270 10/01/2021 20211029 343.19 CHECK 466142 TOTAL: 343.19 466143 10/29/2021 PRTD 143339 MR CUTTING EDGE 3788 09/30/2021 20211029 55.00 CHECK 466143 TOTAL: 55.00 466144 10/29/2021 PRTD 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1322511-01 09/28/2021 20211029 158.74 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1325342-00 09/29/2021 20211029 103.18 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1325360-00 09/29/2021 20211029 -142.55 CHECK 466144 TOTAL: 119.37 466145 10/29/2021 PRTD 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 179359 10/13/2021 20211029 1,374.00 NEW FRANCE WINE CO 179358 10/13/2021 20211029 1,440.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 25 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 466145 TOTAL: 2,814.00 466146 10/29/2021 PRTD 151528 NO WAIT INSIDE LLC 1834 09/30/2021 20211029 56.55 CHECK 466146 TOTAL: 56.55 466147 10/29/2021 PRTD 125089 NOKOMIS SHOE SHOP INC 116287 09/30/2021 20211029 200.00 CHECK 466147 TOTAL: 200.00 466148 10/29/2021 PRTD 142880 NORDIC SOLAR HOLDCO LLC INV-NSH002322 09/30/2021 20211029 9,473.09 CHECK 466148 TOTAL: 9,473.09 466149 10/29/2021 PRTD 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 52948 10/05/2021 20211029 461.22 CHECK 466149 TOTAL: 461.22 466150 10/29/2021 PRTD 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 48969 09/30/2021 20211029 19,995.85 CHECK 466150 TOTAL: 19,995.85 466151 10/29/2021 PRTD 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 49002 09/30/2021 20211029 6,145.52 CHECK 466151 TOTAL: 6,145.52 466152 10/29/2021 PRTD 139023 NUSS TRUCK GROUP INC 738527 09/28/2021 20211029 400.75 CHECK 466152 TOTAL: 400.75 466153 10/29/2021 PRTD 105901 OERTEL ARCHITECTS 20-14b.5 10/05/2021 20211029 1,298.50 CHECK 466153 TOTAL: 1,298.50 466154 10/29/2021 PRTD 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 201996387001 09/28/2021 20211029 229.12 CHECK 466154 TOTAL: 229.12 466155 10/29/2021 PRTD 132107 OLS RESTORATION INC 1571 10/01/2021 20211029 8,058.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 26 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 466155 TOTAL: 8,058.00 466156 10/29/2021 PRTD 100936 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC 677215 10/04/2021 20211029 4.70 CHECK 466156 TOTAL: 4.70 466157 10/29/2021 PRTD 141965 OMNI BREWING COMPANY LLC E-10829 10/13/2021 20211029 238.00 CHECK 466157 TOTAL: 238.00 466158 10/29/2021 PRTD 143542 PACE SYSTEMS INC IN00038696 09/23/2021 20211029 3,600.00 CHECK 466158 TOTAL: 3,600.00 466159 10/29/2021 PRTD 149249 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-120861 10/14/2021 20211029 502.50 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-120860 10/14/2021 20211029 74.00 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-120863 10/14/2021 20211029 48.00 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTING W-120862 10/14/2021 20211029 308.50 CHECK 466159 TOTAL: 933.00 466160 10/29/2021 PRTD 120831 1ST SCRIBE INC 255569 10/01/2021 20211029 425.00 CHECK 466160 TOTAL: 425.00 466161 10/29/2021 PRTD 138081 PETERSON SALT & WATER TREATMENT 191000 09/16/2021 20211029 98.54 CHECK 466161 TOTAL: 98.54 466162 10/29/2021 PRTD 102423 PLAISTED COMPANIES INC 47648 09/30/2021 20211029 905.85 PLAISTED COMPANIES INC 47647 09/30/2021 20211029 905.85 PLAISTED COMPANIES INC 47713 09/30/2021 20211029 3,255.21 CHECK 466162 TOTAL: 5,066.91 466163 10/29/2021 PRTD 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 7268953 09/30/2021 20211029 96.55 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 27 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 466163 TOTAL: 96.55 466164 10/29/2021 PRTD 102728 PRECISION LANDSCAPE AND TREE, INC 83748 10/05/2021 20211029 5,567.50 CHECK 466164 TOTAL: 5,567.50 466165 10/29/2021 PRTD 108875 PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE 66609 10/01/2021 20211029 739.16 PRESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE 66610 10/01/2021 20211029 1,172.74 CHECK 466165 TOTAL: 1,911.90 466166 10/29/2021 PRTD 105690 PRO-TEC DESIGN INC 102500 09/29/2021 20211029 26,937.00 PRO-TEC DESIGN INC 102535 09/30/2021 20211029 3,281.06 PRO-TEC DESIGN INC 102542 09/30/2021 20211029 20,230.00 CHECK 466166 TOTAL: 50,448.06 466167 10/29/2021 PRTD 143618 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-28364 10/12/2021 20211029 1,207.00 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-28365 10/12/2021 20211029 118.00 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC W-28366 10/12/2021 20211029 780.00 CHECK 466167 TOTAL: 2,105.00 466168 10/29/2021 PRTD 100763 QUADIENT, INC 16489990 09/17/2021 20211029 139.73 CHECK 466168 TOTAL: 139.73 466169 10/29/2021 PRTD 100972 R & R SPECIALTIES INC 0073548-IN 09/28/2021 20211029 875.00 R & R SPECIALTIES INC 0073549-IN 09/28/2021 20211029 2,017.50 CHECK 466169 TOTAL: 2,892.50 466170 10/29/2021 PRTD 144351 REHDER, MARK 211 10/03/2021 20211029 2,788.89 CHECK 466170 TOTAL: 2,788.89 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 28 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 466171 10/29/2021 PRTD 114799 RES GREAT LAKES LLC IN17496 09/28/2021 20211029 557.97 CHECK 466171 TOTAL: 557.97 466172 10/29/2021 PRTD 160106 RESTORATION & CONSTRUCTION SERVIC ENG 21-6 #2 09/29/2021 20211029 169,225.16 CHECK 466172 TOTAL: 169,225.16 466173 10/29/2021 PRTD 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 83037 09/29/2021 20211029 220.00 CHECK 466173 TOTAL: 220.00 466174 10/29/2021 PRTD 160220 RITEWAY BUSINESS FORMS 21-32462 09/30/2021 20211029 841.00 CHECK 466174 TOTAL: 841.00 466175 10/29/2021 PRTD 146597 ROBERT FLOORING 717 10/06/2021 20211029 716.85 CHECK 466175 TOTAL: 716.85 466176 10/29/2021 PRTD 129492 ROCHESTER CONCRETE PRODUCTS LLC 270523 10/05/2021 20211029 424.86 CHECK 466176 TOTAL: 424.86 466177 10/29/2021 PRTD 101659 ORKIN 217025739 10/05/2021 20211029 142.36 CHECK 466177 TOTAL: 142.36 466178 10/29/2021 PRTD 129282 ROSENBAUER MINNESOTA LLC 0000049024 09/29/2021 20211029 137.14 CHECK 466178 TOTAL: 137.14 466179 10/29/2021 PRTD 102614 ROTARY INTERNATIONAL EDINA ROTARY 7660 10/03/2021 20211029 335.00 ROTARY INTERNATIONAL EDINA ROTARY 7639 10/03/2021 20211029 315.00 CHECK 466179 TOTAL: 650.00 466180 10/29/2021 PRTD 144553 SALTCO LLC 71910 09/30/2021 20211029 409.30 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 29 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 466180 TOTAL: 409.30 466181 10/29/2021 PRTD 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC 153578 10/01/2021 20211029 377.87 CHECK 466181 TOTAL: 377.87 466182 10/29/2021 PRTD 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP 8105751579 10/01/2021 20211029 908.55 CHECK 466182 TOTAL: 908.55 466183 10/29/2021 PRTD 143208 SECURIAN ASSET MANAGEMENT 203650 09/30/2021 20211029 8,886.05 CHECK 466183 TOTAL: 8,886.05 466184 10/29/2021 PRTD 129604 GJKG INC 10346998 10/01/2021 20211029 175.00 CHECK 466184 TOTAL: 175.00 466185 10/29/2021 PRTD 134643 SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUN SALES000000007072 09/30/2021 22100020 20211029 19,710.00 CHECK 466185 TOTAL: 19,710.00 466186 10/29/2021 PRTD 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO 8271-2 09/29/2021 20211029 672.12 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO 8258-9 09/29/2021 20211029 80.46 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO 8318-1 09/30/2021 20211029 672.27 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO 8397-5 10/04/2021 20211029 64.80 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO 8319-9 09/30/2021 20211029 -672.27 CHECK 466186 TOTAL: 817.38 466187 10/29/2021 PRTD 120784 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 16557 09/29/2021 20211029 55.60 WALSH GRAPHICS INC 16560 09/29/2021 20211029 298.00 CHECK 466187 TOTAL: 353.60 466188 10/29/2021 PRTD 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 113505807-001 10/04/2021 20211029 60.38 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 113461226-001 10/01/2021 20211029 102.75 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 30 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 113428165-001 09/30/2021 20211029 -102.75 CHECK 466188 TOTAL: 60.38 466189 10/29/2021 PRTD 149239 SLEEP NUMBER SELECT COMFORT CORPO 95011989316 09/10/2021 20211029 5,141.10 CHECK 466189 TOTAL: 5,141.10 466190 10/29/2021 PRTD 132195 SMALL LOT MN MN46589 10/12/2021 20211029 268.02 SMALL LOT MN MN46584 10/12/2021 20211029 324.92 SMALL LOT MN MN46590 10/12/2021 20211029 109.04 CHECK 466190 TOTAL: 701.98 466191 10/29/2021 PRTD 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL ARV/49906241 09/29/2021 20211029 150.94 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL ARV/49969425 10/02/2021 20211029 9.43 CHECK 466191 TOTAL: 160.37 466192 10/29/2021 PRTD 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 9947 10/01/2021 20211029 17,776.00 CHECK 466192 TOTAL: 17,776.00 466193 10/29/2021 PRTD 127878 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2136102 10/14/2021 20211029 581.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2136099 10/14/2021 20211029 193.60 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2136103 10/14/2021 20211029 662.30 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2136100 10/14/2021 20211029 300.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2136101 10/14/2021 20211029 415.20 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2136105 10/14/2021 20211029 436.80 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE & SPIRITS L 2136104 10/14/2021 20211029 1,848.80 CHECK 466193 TOTAL: 4,439.10 466194 10/29/2021 PRTD 141066 SW LAWN AND SNOW LLC 2437 10/01/2021 20211029 1,440.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 31 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 466194 TOTAL: 1,440.00 466195 10/29/2021 PRTD 119715 SPARTAN PROMOTIONAL GROUP 600095 09/30/2021 20211029 784.21 CHECK 466195 TOTAL: 784.21 466196 10/29/2021 PRTD 101628 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 102317 10/27/2021 20211029 5.00 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 120617 10/27/2021 20211029 91.00 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 00120003-0110419002 10/27/2021 20211029 38.39 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 00111451-0203131002 10/27/2021 20211029 31.77 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 117536-150738002 10/27/2021 20211029 65.69 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 00105847-0163438008 10/27/2021 20211029 61.39 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 00121348-0120692009 10/27/2021 20211029 94.87 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 09272018 10/27/2021 20211029 207.23 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 00125512-0304289008 10/27/2021 20211029 91.21 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 00123420-0202985001 10/27/2021 20211029 38.73 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 00079040-0153542002 10/27/2021 20211029 68.21 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 00107708-0341817001 10/27/2021 20211029 40.46 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 00125187-0120995012 10/27/2021 20211029 514.39 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 00117898-0166015002 10/27/2021 20211029 18.45 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 00122470-0340102007 10/27/2021 20211029 20.69 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 00076361-0110549005 10/27/2021 20211029 21.27 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 00118760-0350025660 10/27/2021 20211029 5,570.47 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 00088599-0340938007 10/27/2021 20211029 27.25 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 00119926-0120238000 10/27/2021 20211029 33.37 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 00104186-0340732005 10/27/2021 20211029 72.93 CHECK 466196 TOTAL: 7,112.77 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 32 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 466197 10/29/2021 PRTD 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 42683 10/13/2021 20211029 108.00 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 42698 10/13/2021 20211029 423.00 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 42684 10/13/2021 20211029 120.00 CHECK 466197 TOTAL: 651.00 466198 10/29/2021 PRTD 124029 STERICYCLE 8000083754 09/30/2021 20211029 278.40 CHECK 466198 TOTAL: 278.40 466199 10/29/2021 PRTD 101015 STREICHERS INC I1527175 09/30/2021 20211029 292.95 STREICHERS INC I1527612 10/04/2021 20211029 364.96 STREICHERS INC I1527831 10/05/2021 20211029 1,397.00 CHECK 466199 TOTAL: 2,054.91 466200 10/29/2021 PRTD 139302 STRONG TOWNS 3915 09/29/2021 20211029 1,575.00 CHECK 466200 TOTAL: 1,575.00 466201 10/29/2021 PRTD 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 177220 08/27/2021 20211029 497.25 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 177757 08/30/2021 20211029 20.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CM163727 07/16/2021 20211029 -47.96 CHECK 466201 TOTAL: 469.29 466202 10/29/2021 PRTD 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC 10181646 09/29/2021 20211029 356.00 CHECK 466202 TOTAL: 356.00 466203 10/29/2021 PRTD 151143 TALKING WATERS BREWING CO LLC 2480 10/14/2021 20211029 310.00 CHECK 466203 TOTAL: 310.00 466204 10/29/2021 PRTD 126924 CAN HOLDINGS INC 3549 09/16/2021 20211029 481.00 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 33 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET CHECK 466204 TOTAL: 481.00 466205 10/29/2021 PRTD 104932 TAYLOR MADE 35336485 09/07/2021 20211029 371.68 TAYLOR MADE 35326544 09/09/2021 20211029 662.75 CHECK 466205 TOTAL: 1,034.43 466206 10/29/2021 PRTD 111002 TEE JAY NORTH INC 42427 09/29/2021 20211029 2,721.00 CHECK 466206 TOTAL: 2,721.00 466207 10/29/2021 PRTD 129923 CONTEMPORARY INC V798840 09/29/2021 20211029 47.57 CHECK 466207 TOTAL: 47.57 466208 10/29/2021 PRTD 102798 THOMSON REUTERS - WEST 845119953 10/01/2021 20211029 715.00 CHECK 466208 TOTAL: 715.00 466209 10/29/2021 PRTD 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL IN M26754 09/29/2021 20211029 626.00 CHECK 466209 TOTAL: 626.00 466210 10/29/2021 PRTD 101826 TK ELEVATOR CORPORATION 3006199340 10/01/2021 20211029 631.24 CHECK 466210 TOTAL: 631.24 466211 10/29/2021 PRTD 101038 TOLL COMPANY 40143992 09/30/2021 20211029 34.92 TOLL COMPANY 10427076 10/01/2021 20211029 127.54 CHECK 466211 TOTAL: 162.46 466212 10/29/2021 PRTD 122990 TELOCIN GROUP INC INV69642 10/01/2021 20211029 61.29 CHECK 466212 TOTAL: 61.29 466213 10/29/2021 PRTD 104064 TRANS UNION RISK AND ALTERNATIVE 269634-202109-1 10/01/2021 20211029 230.90 CHECK 466213 TOTAL: 230.90 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 34 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 466214 10/29/2021 PRTD 139024 TRUE SEED AND SUPPLY 2783 10/04/2021 20211029 4,635.00 CHECK 466214 TOTAL: 4,635.00 466215 10/29/2021 PRTD 101046 TWIN CITY FILTER SERVICE INC 0710606-IN 09/30/2021 20211029 439.32 CHECK 466215 TOTAL: 439.32 466216 10/29/2021 PRTD 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE COMPANY INC PSI2072167 09/29/2021 20211029 5,000.00 TWIN CITY HARDWARE COMPANY INC PSI2073240 10/05/2021 20211029 33.31 CHECK 466216 TOTAL: 5,033.31 466217 10/29/2021 PRTD 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO 50801 10/05/2021 20211029 200.00 TWIN CITY SEED CO 50808 10/05/2021 20211029 335.00 CHECK 466217 TOTAL: 535.00 466218 10/29/2021 PRTD 146436 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC 045-355889 09/30/2021 20211029 77,667.15 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC 045-356657 09/30/2021 20211029 3,780.00 CHECK 466218 TOTAL: 81,447.15 466219 10/29/2021 PRTD 130874 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA) IN 192208620-008 09/30/2021 20211029 4,500.00 CHECK 466219 TOTAL: 4,500.00 466220 10/29/2021 PRTD 134220 US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 3004000718 10/04/2021 20211029 151.20 CHECK 466220 TOTAL: 151.20 466221 10/29/2021 PRTD 143327 GARBER, CAROL 9-16-21 10/08/2021 20211029 900.00 CHECK 466221 TOTAL: 900.00 466222 10/29/2021 PRTD 100050 USPS 27470 10/25/2021 20211029 5,586.03 CHECK 466222 TOTAL: 5,586.03 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 35 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 466223 10/29/2021 PRTD 103500 VALLEY PAVING INC ENG 21-2 #7 10/01/2021 20211029 642,118.63 CHECK 466223 TOTAL: 642,118.63 466224 10/29/2021 PRTD 101058 VAN PAPER COMPANY 588196-02 09/28/2021 20211029 38.13 VAN PAPER COMPANY 588192-01 09/28/2021 20211029 4.18 VAN PAPER COMPANY 589499-00 10/05/2021 20211029 45.97 VAN PAPER COMPANY 590023-00 10/11/2021 20211029 612.80 CHECK 466224 TOTAL: 701.08 466225 10/29/2021 PRTD 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES 69476 09/27/2021 20211029 358.78 VERSATILE VEHICLES 69456 10/01/2021 20211029 7,138.00 VERSATILE VEHICLES 69457 10/01/2021 20211029 1,164.94 CHECK 466225 TOTAL: 8,661.72 466226 10/29/2021 PRTD 101064 VESSCO INC 085673 09/30/2021 20211029 651.29 CHECK 466226 TOTAL: 651.29 466227 10/29/2021 PRTD 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S005123331.001 09/28/2021 20211029 100.53 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S005096845.001 09/28/2021 20211029 138.99 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S005130578.001 09/30/2021 20211029 29.38 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S005137535.001 10/01/2021 20211029 98.64 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S005137473.002 10/01/2021 20211029 15.88 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S005134334.002 10/04/2021 20211029 67.61 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S005137473.001 10/04/2021 20211029 44.79 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S005070389.001 10/05/2021 20211029 94.99 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY S005137473.003 10/05/2021 20211029 40.81 CHECK 466227 TOTAL: 631.62 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 36 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 466228 10/29/2021 PRTD 160088 VINIFERA IMPORTS 325897 10/05/2021 20211029 220.00 VINIFERA IMPORTS 325901 10/05/2021 20211029 220.00 VINIFERA IMPORTS 325902 10/05/2021 20211029 220.00 CHECK 466228 TOTAL: 660.00 466229 10/29/2021 PRTD 119454 VINOCOPIA INC 0288825-IN 10/14/2021 20211029 648.75 VINOCOPIA INC 0288823-IN 10/14/2021 20211029 1,077.37 VINOCOPIA INC 0288824-IN 10/14/2021 20211029 614.25 VINOCOPIA INC 0288835-IN 10/14/2021 20211029 786.61 VINOCOPIA INC 0288834-IN 10/14/2021 20211029 714.30 VINOCOPIA INC 0288836-IN 10/14/2021 20211029 160.61 VINOCOPIA INC 0288837-IN 10/14/2021 20211029 615.00 CHECK 466229 TOTAL: 4,616.89 466230 10/29/2021 PRTD 120627 PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP INC 62103076 10/01/2021 20211029 484.65 CHECK 466230 TOTAL: 484.65 466231 10/29/2021 PRTD 143468 VONDENKAMP, MARK 001095 10/12/2021 20211029 117.00 VONDENKAMP, MARK 001094 10/12/2021 20211029 166.50 CHECK 466231 TOTAL: 283.50 466232 10/29/2021 PRTD 106699 WALSER HOPKINS CJ, LLC 692511 09/28/2021 20211029 4.48 CHECK 466232 TOTAL: 4.48 466233 10/29/2021 PRTD 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 8591425-2282-9 10/05/2021 20211029 362.42 CHECK 466233 TOTAL: 362.42 466234 10/29/2021 PRTD 101033 WINE COMPANY 185596 10/08/2021 20211029 340.95 WINE COMPANY 185594 10/08/2021 20211029 406.60 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 37 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET WINE COMPANY 185593 10/08/2021 20211029 340.95 WINE COMPANY 185595 10/08/2021 20211029 340.95 WINE COMPANY 185873 10/13/2021 20211029 730.80 WINE COMPANY 185875 10/13/2021 20211029 153.65 WINE COMPANY 185874 10/13/2021 20211029 1,302.15 WINE COMPANY 185872 10/13/2021 20211029 1,100.50 CHECK 466234 TOTAL: 4,716.55 466235 10/29/2021 PRTD 130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 64682230 09/10/2021 20211029 -1,153.27 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 64710695 10/01/2021 20211029 2,153.94 CHECK 466235 TOTAL: 1,000.67 466236 10/29/2021 PRTD 148067 WITLINGO INC INV-COE-102021 10/01/2021 20211029 250.00 CHECK 466236 TOTAL: 250.00 466237 10/29/2021 PRTD 118395 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC E2110536 09/22/2021 20211029 38.35 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC E2112518 10/02/2021 20211029 87.94 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC 2152391.002 10/05/2021 20211029 1,031.76 CHECK 466237 TOTAL: 1,158.05 466238 10/29/2021 PRTD 142162 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 3008 10/08/2021 20211029 90.00 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 3010 10/08/2021 20211029 51.00 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 3009 10/08/2021 20211029 230.10 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 3011 10/08/2021 20211029 179.10 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY LLC 3019 10/15/2021 20211029 179.10 CHECK 466238 TOTAL: 729.30 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 38 CASH ACCOUNT: 9999 1012 Control BS - CashAP CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE INV DATE PO CHECK RUN NET 466239 10/29/2021 PRTD 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES R-018552-000-2 09/29/2021 20211029 3,682.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES R-018609-000-2 09/29/2021 20211029 507.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES R-018610-000-2 09/29/2021 20211029 3,526.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES R-018611-000-2 09/29/2021 20211029 440.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES R-018612-000-2 09/29/2021 20211029 299.00 CHECK 466239 TOTAL: 8,455.00 466240 10/29/2021 PRTD 103410 WW GOETSCH ASSOCIATES INC 106943 09/30/2021 20211029 1,440.00 CHECK 466240 TOTAL: 1,440.00 466241 10/29/2021 PRTD 103266 YORKDALE SHOPPES PARTNERS, LLC OCT 2021 09/29/2021 20211029 1,079.25 CHECK 466241 TOTAL: 1,079.25 466242 10/29/2021 PRTD 101091 ZIEGLER INC IN000267900 09/30/2021 20211029 90.00 ZIEGLER INC IN000271227 10/02/2021 20211029 121.53 CHECK 466242 TOTAL: 211.53 NUMBER OF CHECKS 253 *** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL *** 1,913,724.45 COUNT AMOUNT TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS 253 1,913,724.45 *** GRAND TOTAL *** 1,913,724.45 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 39 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED CLERK: LJefferson YEAR PER JNL SRC ACCOUNT ACCOUNT DESC T OB DEBIT CREDIT EFF DATE JNL DESC REF 1 REF 2 REF 3 LINE DESC 2021 10 1819APP 4000-2010 Cap Prj BS - Accts Pay 156,544.81 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 9999-1012 Control BS - CashAP 1,913,724.45 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 5800-2010 Liquor BS - Accts Pay 175,989.04 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 59005900-2010 Wat BS - Accts Pay 123,054.18 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 1000-2010 GF Bal Sh - Accts Pay 391,739.75 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 52005200-2010 Course BS - Accts Pay 21,367.29 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 5300-2010 Aqu Ctr BS - Accts Pay 1,920.00 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 5700-2010 Cent Lk BS - Accts Pay 10,677.61 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 5400-2010 EdinPrk BS - Accts Pay 9,300.96 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 6100-2010 Equ Op BS - Accts Pay 27,210.76 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 6300-2010 FacMgmt BS - Accts Pay 11,460.74 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 6200-2010 I.T. BalSh - Accts Pay 27,484.21 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 26126106-2010 Grnd 2 TIF - Accts Pay 196,734.66 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 59005920-2010 Stm BS - Accts Pay 241,745.89 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 7100-2010 PSTF BS - Accts Pay 12,865.23 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 5500-2010 Arena BS - Accts Pay 15,529.73 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 5100-2010 Art BalSh - Accts Pay 927.00 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 52005210-2010 Dome BS - Accts Pay 6,626.53 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 59005910-2010 Sew BS - Accts Pay 28,550.30 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 2300-2010 PACS BalSh - Accts Pay 205,891.13 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 21002100-2010 E911 BS - Accts Pay 265.00 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 6000-2010 Rsk Mg BS - Accts Pay 3,842.23 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 59005930-2010 Rec BS - Accts Pay 20,493.10 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 5600-2010 Field BS - Accts Pay 151.76 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 40 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED YEAR PER JNL SRC ACCOUNT ACCOUNT DESC T OB DEBIT CREDIT EFF DATE JNL DESC REF 1 REF 2 REF 3 LINE DESC 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 21002130-2010 DWI BS - Accts Pay 910.00 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 4400-2010 PIR CP BS - Accts Pay 222,143.54 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL APP 2400-2010 A&C BalSh - Accts Pay 299.00 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ AP CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL GENERAL LEDGER TOTAL 1,913,724.45 1,913,724.45 APP 9999-2099 Control BS - PoolCashL 1,913,724.45 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ APP 4000-1010 Cap Prj BS - Cash 156,544.81 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ APP 5800-1010 Liquor BS - Cash 175,989.04 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ APP 59005900-1010 Wat BS - Cash 123,054.18 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ APP 1000-1010 GF Bal Sh - Cash 391,739.75 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ APP 52005200-1010 Course BS - Cash 21,367.29 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ APP 5300-1010 Aqu Ctr BS - Cash 1,920.00 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ APP 5700-1010 Cent Lk BS - Cash 10,677.61 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ APP 5400-1010 EdinPrk BS - Cash 9,300.96 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ APP 6100-1010 Equ Op BS - Cash 27,210.76 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ APP 6300-1010 FacMgmt BS - Cash 11,460.74 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ APP 6200-1010 I.T. BalSh - Cash 27,484.21 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ APP 26126106-1010 Grnd 2 TIF - Cash 196,734.66 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ APP 59005920-1010 Stm BS - Cash 241,745.89 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ APP 7100-1010 PSTF BS - Cash 12,865.23 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ APP 5500-1010 Arena BS - Cash 15,529.73 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ APP 5100-1010 Art BalSh - Cash 927.00 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ APP 52005210-1010 Dome BS - Cash 6,626.53 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ APP 59005910-1010 Sew BS - Cash 28,550.30 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 41 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED YEAR PER JNL SRC ACCOUNT ACCOUNT DESC T OB DEBIT CREDIT EFF DATE JNL DESC REF 1 REF 2 REF 3 LINE DESC APP 2300-1010 PACS BalSh - Cash 205,891.13 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ APP 21002100-1010 E911 BS - Cash 265.00 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ APP 6000-1010 Rsk Mg BS - Cash 3,842.23 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ APP 59005930-1010 Rec BS - Cash 20,493.10 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ APP 5600-1010 Field BS - Cash 151.76 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ APP 21002130-1010 DWI BS - Cash 910.00 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ APP 4400-1010 PIR CP BS - Cash 222,143.54 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ APP 2400-1010 A&C BalSh - Cash 299.00 10/29/2021 20211029 LJ SYSTEM GENERATED ENTRIES TOTAL 1,913,724.45 1,913,724.45 JOURNAL 2021/10/1819 TOTAL 3,827,448.90 3,827,448.90 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 42 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND BALANCE SEG YEAR PER JNL EFF DATE DEBIT CREDIT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 1000 General 2021 10 1819 10/29/2021 1000-1010 GF Bal Sh - Cash 391,739.75 1000-2010 GF Bal Sh - Accts Pay 391,739.75 TOTAL 391,739.75 391,739.75 FUND TOTAL 391,739.75 391,739.75 2100 2100 Police SR /Emergency 2021 10 1819 10/29/2021 21002100-1010 E911 BS - Cash 265.00 21002100-2010 E911 BS - Accts Pay 265.00 2100 TOTAL 265.00 265.00 2100 2130 Police SR /DWI Forfei 2021 10 1819 10/29/2021 21002130-1010 DWI BS - Cash 910.00 21002130-2010 DWI BS - Accts Pay 910.00 FUND TOTAL 1,175.00 1,175.00 2300 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety 2021 10 1819 10/29/2021 2300-1010 PACS BalSh - Cash 205,891.13 2300-2010 PACS BalSh - Accts Pay 205,891.13 FUND TOTAL 205,891.13 205,891.13 2400 Arts and Culture 2021 10 1819 10/29/2021 2400-1010 A&C BalSh - Cash 299.00 2400-2010 A&C BalSh - Accts Pay 299.00 TOTAL 299.00 299.00 FUND TOTAL 299.00 299.00 2600 26106 HRA /Grandview 2021 10 1819 10/29/2021 26126106-1010 Grnd 2 TIF - Cash 196,734.66 26126106-2010 Grnd 2 TIF - Accts Pay 196,734.66 FUND TOTAL 196,734.66 196,734.66 4000 Capital Projects 2021 10 1819 10/29/2021 4000-1010 Cap Prj BS - Cash 156,544.81 4000-2010 Cap Prj BS - Accts Pay 156,544.81 FUND TOTAL 156,544.81 156,544.81 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 43 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND BALANCE SEG YEAR PER JNL EFF DATE DEBIT CREDIT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 4400 PIR Capital Projects 2021 10 1819 10/29/2021 4400-1010 PIR CP BS - Cash 222,143.54 4400-2010 PIR CP BS - Accts Pay 222,143.54 FUND TOTAL 222,143.54 222,143.54 5100 Art Center 2021 10 1819 10/29/2021 5100-1010 Art BalSh - Cash 927.00 5100-2010 Art BalSh - Accts Pay 927.00 TOTAL 927.00 927.00 FUND TOTAL 927.00 927.00 5200 5200 Golf /Braemar Go 2021 10 1819 10/29/2021 52005200-1010 Course BS - Cash 21,367.29 52005200-2010 Course BS - Accts Pay 21,367.29 5200 TOTAL 21,367.29 21,367.29 5200 5210 Golf /Braemar Go 2021 10 1819 10/29/2021 52005210-1010 Dome BS - Cash 6,626.53 52005210-2010 Dome BS - Accts Pay 6,626.53 FUND TOTAL 27,993.82 27,993.82 5300 Aquatic Center 2021 10 1819 10/29/2021 5300-1010 Aqu Ctr BS - Cash 1,920.00 5300-2010 Aqu Ctr BS - Accts Pay 1,920.00 FUND TOTAL 1,920.00 1,920.00 5400 Edinborough Park 2021 10 1819 10/29/2021 5400-1010 EdinPrk BS - Cash 9,300.96 5400-2010 EdinPrk BS - Accts Pay 9,300.96 FUND TOTAL 9,300.96 9,300.96 5500 Braemar Arena 2021 10 1819 10/29/2021 5500-1010 Arena BS - Cash 15,529.73 5500-2010 Arena BS - Accts Pay 15,529.73 FUND TOTAL 15,529.73 15,529.73 5600 Braemar Field 2021 10 1819 10/29/2021 5600-1010 Field BS - Cash 151.76 5600-2010 Field BS - Accts Pay 151.76 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 44 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND BALANCE SEG YEAR PER JNL EFF DATE DEBIT CREDIT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION FUND TOTAL 151.76 151.76 5700 Centennial Lakes 2021 10 1819 10/29/2021 5700-1010 Cent Lk BS - Cash 10,677.61 5700-2010 Cent Lk BS - Accts Pay 10,677.61 FUND TOTAL 10,677.61 10,677.61 5800 Liquor 2021 10 1819 10/29/2021 5800-1010 Liquor BS - Cash 175,989.04 5800-2010 Liquor BS - Accts Pay 175,989.04 TOTAL 175,989.04 175,989.04 FUND TOTAL 175,989.04 175,989.04 5900 5900 Utl Fund /Water 2021 10 1819 10/29/2021 59005900-1010 Wat BS - Cash 123,054.18 59005900-2010 Wat BS - Accts Pay 123,054.18 5900 TOTAL 123,054.18 123,054.18 5900 5910 Utl Fund /Sanitary S 2021 10 1819 10/29/2021 59005910-1010 Sew BS - Cash 28,550.30 59005910-2010 Sew BS - Accts Pay 28,550.30 5910 TOTAL 28,550.30 28,550.30 5900 5920 Utl Fund /Storm Sewe 2021 10 1819 10/29/2021 59005920-1010 Stm BS - Cash 241,745.89 59005920-2010 Stm BS - Accts Pay 241,745.89 5920 TOTAL 241,745.89 241,745.89 5900 5930 Utl Fund /Recycling 2021 10 1819 10/29/2021 59005930-1010 Rec BS - Cash 20,493.10 59005930-2010 Rec BS - Accts Pay 20,493.10 FUND TOTAL 413,843.47 413,843.47 6000 Risk Management 2021 10 1819 10/29/2021 6000-1010 Rsk Mg BS - Cash 3,842.23 6000-2010 Rsk Mg BS - Accts Pay 3,842.23 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 45 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND BALANCE SEG YEAR PER JNL EFF DATE DEBIT CREDIT ACCOUNT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION FUND TOTAL 3,842.23 3,842.23 6100 Equipment Operations 2021 10 1819 10/29/2021 6100-1010 Equ Op BS - Cash 27,210.76 6100-2010 Equ Op BS - Accts Pay 27,210.76 FUND TOTAL 27,210.76 27,210.76 6200 Information Technology 2021 10 1819 10/29/2021 6200-1010 I.T. BalSh - Cash 27,484.21 6200-2010 I.T. BalSh - Accts Pay 27,484.21 FUND TOTAL 27,484.21 27,484.21 6300 Facilities Management 2021 10 1819 10/29/2021 6300-1010 FacMgmt BS - Cash 11,460.74 6300-2010 FacMgmt BS - Accts Pay 11,460.74 FUND TOTAL 11,460.74 11,460.74 7100 PS Training Facility 2021 10 1819 10/29/2021 7100-1010 PSTF BS - Cash 12,865.23 7100-2010 PSTF BS - Accts Pay 12,865.23 FUND TOTAL 12,865.23 12,865.23 9999 Pooled Cash Fund 2021 10 1819 10/29/2021 9999-1012 Control BS - CashAP 1,913,724.45 9999-2099 Control BS - PoolCashL 1,913,724.45 FUND TOTAL 1,913,724.45 1,913,724.45 City of Edina, MN A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL Report generated: 10/28/2021 12:49User: LJeffersonProgram ID: apcshdsb Page 46 JOURNAL ENTRIES TO BE CREATED FUND SUB FUND DUE TO DUE FR 1000 General 391,739.752100 Police Special Revenue 265.002100 Police Special Revenue 910.002300 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety 205,891.132400 Arts and Culture 299.002600 Housing & Redvlpmt Authority 196,734.664000 Capital Projects 156,544.814400 PIR Capital Projects 222,143.545100 Art Center 927.005200 Braemar Golf Course 21,367.295200 Braemar Golf Course 6,626.535300 Aquatic Center 1,920.005400 Edinborough Park 9,300.965500 Braemar Arena 15,529.735600 Braemar Field 151.765700 Centennial Lakes 10,677.615800 Liquor 175,989.045900 Utility Fund 123,054.185900 Utility Fund 28,550.305900 Utility Fund 241,745.895900 Utility Fund 20,493.106000 Risk Management 3,842.236100 Equipment Operations 27,210.766200 Information Technology 27,484.216300 Facilities Management 11,460.747100 PS Training Facility 12,865.239999 Pooled Cash Fund 1,913,724.45 TOTAL 1,913,724.45 1,913,724.45 ** END OF REPORT - Generated by Lonnia Jefferson ** Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-97 & Ordinance No. 2021-03: Site Improvement Plan Agreement, and Final Rezoning from PCD-1 and APD to PUD at 4917 Eden Avenue CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2021-97 granting approval of the Final Rezoning, grant second reading of Ordinance No. 2021-03 establishing the PUD Zoning District for this site, and approve the Site Improvement Plan Agreement. INTRODUCTION: On June 1, 2021, the City Council granted Preliminary Approval of the project to building a 7-story apartment and restaurant on the site. T he applicant has submitted final plans, which have not changed since the preliminary approval. Engineering staff has completed a study which includes a plan to address transportation issues east of Highway 100 in the Grandview District by the City of Edina. The plans will be shared with the neighborhood and considered by the HRA and City Council in 2021. The City Attorney has drafted the Site Improvement P lan agreement, which is acceptable to the applicant. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-97 Ordinance No 2021-03 Final Plans 1 of 2 Final Plans 2 of 2 Approved Preliminary Plans Site Improvement Plan Agreement (SIPA) RESOLUTION NO. 2021-97 APPROVING FINAL REZONING FROM PCD-1 PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT- 1 AND APD, AUTOMOBILE PARKING DISTRICT TO PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, FINAL SITE PLAN AND SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN AGREEMENT FOR 4917 EDEN AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 RueterWalton is proposing to re-develop 4917 Eden Avenue, currently occupied by a Perkins Restaurant and office building. The applicant would tear down the existing Perkins and office and build a seven (7) story 196-unit apartment and 3,700 square foot restaurant. The applicant shall provide 10% of the units at 50% AMI for affordable housing.. 1.02 On April 28, 2021, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the Request. Vote: 7 Ayes and 1 Nays. 1.03 On June 1, 2021 the City Council held a public hearing and approved the request. 1.04 The applicant has submitted final plans that are consistent with approved preliminary plans. 1.05 The City Attorney has drafted the Site Improvement Plan Agreement, to which the applicant is agreeable. 1.06 To address one of the conditions of Preliminary Approval, engineering staff has completed a study which includes a plan to address transportation issues east of Highway 100 in the Grandview District by the City of Edina. The plans will be shared with the neighborhood and considered by the HRA and City Council in 2021. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses, and density are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the existing Zoning on the site. 2. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The PUD zoning would: a. Promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-97 Page 2 c. Provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements include sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street. d. Project is of high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned. e. Maintains the efficiency of public streets and utilities. f. Provides a mixture of land uses within the development. g. Project would meet the City’s affordable housing policy. 3. The PUD would ensure that the development proposed would be the only building that would be allowed on the site unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 4. The PUD would ensure 10% of the units within the building would be for affordable housing. 5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. The 20 affordable housing units would help the City of Edina achieve its goal with the Met Council of creating 1,804 units by the year 2030. b. A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern present in much of the city will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. i. Provide visual screening and privacy to buffer cars from people, provide visual relief and allow stormwater infiltration in parking lots. ii. Evaluate current parking standards in order to encourage shared parking and minimize the visual impact of surface parking. iii. Landscaping is essential to screen parking areas, buffer adjacent residential uses and create a pedestrian-friendly environment along streets. c. Encourage successful mixed-use development. d. Create and maintain housing options that serve a diverse range of ages, household types, and economic situations. e. Ensure that public realm design respects community character, supports of commercial and mixed-use development, promotes community identity, and creates high quality experiences for pedestrians, cyclists, transit users, and motorists. f. Multifamily. This land use is defined by the multiple unit building type where each individual unit does not have direct ground floor access to the exterior. Multifamily developments are concentrated primarily along the main traffic arteries and are generally located toward the edges of the city, often in proximity to retail business RESOLUTION NO. 2021-97 Page 3 establishments. Concentrations of multifamily developments are found along York Avenue, France Avenue, Vernon Avenue, Lincoln Drive, and Cahill Road. g. Per the Mixed-Use Land Use Description: “Primary uses: Retail, office, service, multifamily residential, and institutional uses. Vertical mixed-use should be encouraged and may be required on larger sites.” h. “Mixed-use development allows for a savings in time and convenience for residents who choose to live in closer proximity to where they work and shop. Community interest is served by this type of development, as the city is able to integrate additional residences and businesses more efficiently within existing city infrastructure. Pedestrian amenities and proximity of uses encourage more trips to be made by foot or bike, reducing the increase of congestion that can otherwise result from conventional development of separated land uses.” i. “Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. j. “Support the development of mixed-use districts that provide a variety of living opportunities within a walkable and livable area.” 6. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. Wenck Consulting conducted a traffic and parking impact study and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. 7. The proposed height of seven stories is reasonable for this site. To provide affordable housing within this project, the additional height is needed to create more market rate units to help absorb the cost of the affordable housing units. The building height overlay district limits this site to four stories. The nearest single-family home to this site is 540 feet to the north. Section 36-618 (6) of the City Code requires that buildings within the PCD District that are 7 stories tall, be setback 4 times the height of the building. The building would be 76 feet tall, therefore, a 304-foot setback is required. 8. The proposed uses would be an upgrade to the current development on the site. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves Final Rezoning of the site from PCD-1, Planned Commercial District-1 and APD, Automobile Parking District to PUD-21, Planned Unit District – 21 and the Site Improvement Plan Agreement. Approval is subject to the following conditions: RESOLUTION NO. 2021-97 Page 4 1. Project shall be constructed per the Final Plans dated October 5, 2021 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. Proposed bike parking stalls should be in convenient, well-lit locations within 50’ of a public entrance to a principal building. Rack style and spacing should follow the recommendations of the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (APBP). 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. A Site Improvement Plan Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 8. The project must conform to the City’s affordable housing policy. The project shall provide 10% of the units (20 units) within the building for affordable housing for families earning 50% area median income (AMI) for the Twin Cities. 9. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated April 21, 2021, and the transportation engineer memo dated April 21, 2021. 10. There shall be a minimum of 4 EV charging stations installed and a minimum of an additional 40 stalls wired to accommodate future EV installation. 11. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment revising the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 12. Provision of a green roof and solar garden as shown on the building renderings. 13. Compliance with all the conditions outlined in the fire marshal and building official’s memo dated April 22, 2021. 14. Submittal of a construction management plan subject to review and approval of city staff prior to issuance of a building permit. The plan must demonstrate minimal impact to pedestrian and vehicle movement. 15. Hours of construction must be consistent with City Code. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-97 Page 5 16. Provide the necessary easement for potential highway off-ramp along the westerly property line. 17. Driveway Entrance permit required for entrance reconstruction. Driveway on Wilson Road shall be at least 50-feet from the intersection with Eden Ave per City Code. 18. Maintenance of sidewalks to be responsibility of property owner. Maintenance of sidewalks on Eden Ave and Wilson Road will be by the City. City snowplowing operations are 5-feet wide on these sidewalks. If owner wants a wider path, this would be the responsibility of the owner. 19. Install a sidewalk from the restaurant entrance and west side parking area to Eden Avenue for pedestrian access and safety. 20. Pedestrian crossing improvements shall be made to the intersection of Willson and Eden Avenue subject to approval of the city engineer. 21. A satisfactory plan for resolution of the transportation system issues east of Highway 100 in the Grandview District by the City of Edina. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-97 Page 6 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on November 3, 2021. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 3, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2021. _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk DRAFT ORDINANCE FOR CONSIDERATION MAY 18, 2021 Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX ORDINANCE NO. 2021-03 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD PUD-21, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-21, AT 4719 EDEN AVENUE The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended to add the following: Sec. 36-505 Planned Unit Development District-21 (PUD-21) – 4719 Eden Avenue (a) Legal description: Tract A and C, Registered Land Survey No. 1501 Hennepin County Minnesota. (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans, including the master development plan for the site received by the City on October 5, 2021 except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2021-97 on file in the Office of the Planning Department. (c) Principal Uses: All uses allowed in the PCD-1 Zoning District Multifamily Residential (d) Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the PCD-1 Zoning District. All accessory uses allowed in the PCD-1 Zoning District (e) Conditional Uses: None Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 2 (f) Development Standards. In addition to the development standards per the PCD- 1 Zoning District, the following shall apply: Standard Building Setbacks Front – Eden Avenue Front – Wilson Road Side – Highway 100 Side – South 14 feet building 5 feet posts (29 feet to curb) 15 feet building 13 feet posts (35’ to curb) 100+ feet 10 feet Building Height 7 stories and 77 feet Proximity to R-1, Single- family homes 540 feet Density 94 units per acre Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 2.5% Parking 277 spaces 29 + 8 on east side, with room for more on west side if needed (g) Signs shall be regulated per the PCD-1 Zoning District for the retail uses, and PRD, for the residential uses. (h) The residential housing on the site shall include 10% of all the dwelling units to meet the City’s definition of affordable housing. Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 3 ATTEST: ______________________________ _____________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of _______, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of ____________, 2021. ________________________________ City Clerk UP UP A.1A.1 DD EE J BE 4 5.2 10 9.2 STAIR A P2-A ELEVATOR A ELEVATOR C ELEVATOR B STAIR B P2-B UP 7.2 LOWER LEVEL PARKING P200 1 A501 1 A501 2 A501 2 A501 ELECTRICAL & MECH P203 MECH / EXHAUST P204 P2-BP2-AP203 VESTIBULE P201 VESTIBULE P202 P2011' - 6 1/2"18' - 0"24' - 0"22' - 2 3/8"RAMP WIDTH23' - 11 5/8" VEHICLE8"18' - 0"DRIVE AISLE24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"DRIVE AISLE24' - 0"18' - 0"1 ' - 0 1 1 /16"1 8' - 0 " 2 4' - 0"DRI VE AI SLE24' - 0"STALL18' - 0"1' - 6" 2 4 ' - 0 "1 8 ' - 0 "132133 134135136137138139140141142143144145146147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 FC-1 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202203204205206 207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 241240 242 243 244 245 246 247 248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 HOSE BIB A702 2 A701 2 VEHICLE RAMP 2 6 ' - 0 "K B1 B3 A3 A3 B4 B5 L BC B6 BD 13 16 19 20.1 CE CC CD CB CA H H G G 2221 C1 C2 F F C C B B 23 23 16.914.5 11.921 AA AC AE BB BA CC.6 CC.6 A2 A2 2' - 4"14' - 2"31' - 0"12' - 4 1/2"2 7 ' - 0 "1 2 ' - 9 "2 3 ' - 7 "3 5 ' - 4 "H.5 BA.0 B2 F.D. -5" -2" B.O. RAMP +0" F.D. -5" -2" -2" F.D. -5" F.D. -5"F.D. -5" F.D. -5"F.D. -5" -2" -2" -2"-2" -2" -2"-2" F.D. -5" -2" -2" +0"+0" -2"-2"-2" -2"-2" -2"-2" -2" -2"-2"-2"-2" -2" -2" -2" -2"-2" -2" -2" -2" -2" -2" -2" -2" -2" +0" F.D. -5"F.D. -5"F.D. -5" F.D. -5" F.D. -5" F.D. -5" F.D. -5" +0" +0" +0" +0" F.D. -3" DRIVE AISLE 24' - 0" 14 A A1 A1 12' - 0"0"4' - 0"AREA WELL A1.1 A1.1 AD 6 7 8 953 11 12 15 17 18 20 S1' - 8" 9' - 4" 0 M80 M80 M8 ALIGN END OF WALL WITH DRIVE AISLE 18' - 0" 0 M12 8"MAINTENANCE P205 P205ALIGN ALIGN CENTER WALL ON COLUMN 0 M80 M8 MECHANICAL EXHAUST BF CC.5 TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering B K V R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2021 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2021.rvt10/5/2021 5:21:54 PMTDE, DJR JDE 2286-05 A098 LEVEL P2 FLOOR PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE A098 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 LEVEL P2 FLOOR PLAN ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES PARKING TOTALS LEVEL/ STALL TYPE COUNT LEVEL P2 ACCESSIBLE 5 COMPACT 32 STANDARD 109 LEVEL P1 ACCESSIBLE 5 COMPACT 23 STANDARD 103 TOTAL STALLS: 277 FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. CONSTRUCT FIRE BLOCKING IN CONCEALED WALL SPACES PER IBC REQUIREMENTS. 2. IF BLOCKING AND FASTENING REQUIREMENTS OF WALL ASSEMBLY LISTED IN UL DESIGN SYSTEM VARIES FROM STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS THE WALLS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO MEET THE MORE RESTRICTIVE REQUIREMENT. 3. IF A SUBSTITUTION OF A WALL, FLOOR OR ROOF ASSEMBLY IS REQUESTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A TESTED ASSEMBLY MATCHING OR EXCEEDING REQUIREMENTS OF THOSE SHOWN IN THE DOCUMENTS. 4. ALL SHAFT WALLS TO CONTINUOUSLY EXTEND FROM TOP OF FOUNDATION OR FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY TO UNDERSIDE OF FLOOR OR ROOF SHEATHING, SLAB OR DECK ABOVE. 5. ALL STAIR AND ELEVATOR ENCLOSURES TO CONTINUOUSLY EXTEND TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF DECK. DO NOT PENETRATE STAIR AND ELEVATOR FIRE RATING MEMBRANE PROTECTION UNLESS SERVING STAIR AND ELEVATOR ENCLOSURE. 6. EXTERIOR WALL ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE AIRTIGHT. HAIRLINE CRACKS AND SMALL HOLES ARE NOT ALLOWED. 7. FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION CHANGE AT DOORS AND FLOORING MATERIAL NOT TO EXCEED 1/2" WITH BEVELED STEP AND 1/4" WITH VERTICAL STEP, U.N.O. 8. ALL DOOR AND PASSAGE OPENINGS ON ACCESSIBLE ROUTE IN COMMON AREAS TO BE 32" CLEAR MINIMUM WITH DOOR IN OPEN POSITION. 9. COMMON AREA DOOR CLEARANCES AND APPROACHES PER APPLICABLE ACCESSIBILITY CODES. 10. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. 11. PROVIDE BLOCKING AND BACKER SUPPORT FOR WALL AND CEILING MOUNTED HARDWARE, EQUIPMENT, AND ACCESSORIES. 12. REMOVE DEBRIS AND CLEAN ALL AREA RECEIVING SEALANTS FOR MAXIMUM ADHESION AND PERFORMANCE. 13. PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS SEALANT JOIN BETWEEN DISSIMILAR MATERIALS OR CONSTRUCTION. 14. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR SHEAR AND BEARING WALL CONSTRUCTION AND REQUIREMENTS. 15. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR CONCRETE AND MASONRY WALL REINFORCING. 16. WOOD IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE TO BE PRESSURE TREATED WOOD. 17. USE MOISTURE RESISTANT GYP. BD. AT BATHROOM AND TOILET ROOMS. 18. WHERE TWO DIFFERENT FIRE-RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTIONS INTERSECT, THE MORE RESTRICTIVE SHALL BE CONTINUOUS. ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 07/02/2021 SD SET 09/10/2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET 10/05/2021 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN UP UP DN DN A.1A.1 DD EE N J BE 4 5.2 10 9.2 STAIR A P1-A ELEVATOR A VEHICLE RAMP ELEVATOR C ELEVATOR B STAIR B P1-B1' - 0 1/2"18' - 6"24' - 0"21' - 2"25' - 0"8"18' - 0"DRIVE AISLE24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"DRIVE AISLE24' - 0"18' - 0"1' - 2"DN 110' - 0" DRIVE AISLE 24' - 0" 1 8 ' - 0" 24 ' - 0 "18' - 0"DRI VE AI SLE24' - 0"18' - 0"1' - 6"2 4 ' - 0 " 1 8 ' - 0 "7.2 TRASH ROOM P107 BIKE ROOM P108 POOL EQUIPMENT ROOM P109 LOADING / STAGING P104 PET SPA P105 UPPER LEVEL PARKING P100 VAN 1 A501 1 A501 2 A501 2 A501 DOG RUN 1' - 9"BUILDING ABOVE (DASHED LINE) WATER ROOM P103 SERVICE ENTRY DN (TO GARAGE) VESTIBULE P102 P1-BP107 P109P101AP101B P1-A1P1-A2VESTIBULE P101 P100A P104 P103 P105BP105AP108 P100BVAN 3 5 ' - 4 "L-1 L-1 AIR INTAKE (L-P2) AIR INTAKE (L-P1)12345678910111213 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 FP-1 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 FP-1 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 FP-1 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 626364656667686970717273747576777879808182 83 FP-1 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 A702 3 A701 3 DRIVE AISLE 24' - 0" K B1 B3 A3 A3 B4 B5 L BC B6 BD 13 16 19 20.1 PCE CC CD CB CA HH G G 2221 C1 C2 F F C C B B 23 23 16.914.5 11.921 AA AC AE BB BA CC.6 CC.6 A2 A2 H.5 BA.0 M B2 A741 2 F.D. -5" -2" F.D. -5" -2" -2" F.D. -5" F.D. -5"F.D. -5" F.D. -5" -2" -2" -2"-2" -2" -2"-2" F.D. -5" B.O. VEHICLE RAMP+0" -2" +0"+0" -2"-2"-2" -2" -2" -2"-2" -2" -2"-2"-2"-2" -2" -2" -2" -2"-2" +0"+0" -2" -2"-2" -2" -2" -2" +0" -2" +0" F.D. -4" F.D. -5" F.D. -5" F.D. -5" +0" +0" BUILDING ABOVE T.O. RAMP +0" -2" F.D. -4"+0" F.D. -3"+0" F.D. -5"F.D. -5"F.D. -5" F.D. -5" A01 A01 A01 EXTENTS OF TRAFFIC COATING (HATCHED AREA) UP RETAINING WALL, REFER TO LANDSCAPE DN 5.0% 5.0 %5.9% 14 A A1 A1 AREA WELL 9' - 4" 1' - 8" ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN 90° 1415 0 M80 M80 M80 M8 A1.1 A1.1 AD 6 7 8 953 11 12 15 17 18 20 S M.9 +0" 3' - 0 "3' - 0"BIKE REPAIR STATION 8"ELECTRICAL PANELS MECHANICAL EXHAUST BF CC.5 8' - 6" TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2021 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2021.rvt10/5/2021 5:10:48 PMTDE, DJR JDE 2286-05 A099 LEVEL P1 FLOOR PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES A01 CABLE RAIL VEHICLE BARRIER, MIN. 42" HIGH. SEE STRUCTURAL. A099 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 LEVEL P1 FLOOR PLAN PARKING TOTALS LEVEL/ STALL TYPE COUNT LEVEL P2 ACCESSIBLE 5 COMPACT 32 STANDARD 109 LEVEL P1 ACCESSIBLE 5 COMPACT 23 STANDARD 103 TOTAL STALLS: 277 ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 07/02/2021 SD SET 09/10/2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET 10/05/2021 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN DN UP DN UP UP A.1 A.1 STAIR A L1-A ELEVATOR A MECH - A 151 STAIR B L1-B ELEC/DATA 168 ELEVATOR C ELEVATOR B RESTAURANT R100 VESTIBULE 172 PARCEL 169 LOBBY 171 CLUBROOM 164 MENS LOCKER ROOM 167 FITNESS 166 DD EE N J BE 4 10 9.2 TRASH 161 7.2 1 A501 1 A501 2 A501 2 A501 2 A401 3 A402 30' - 0"5' - 6"30' - 0"30' - 0"5' - 6"L1-AR100A 161151165A166A167B2 A402 4 A402 1 A401 3 A404 4 A404 1 A404 1 A403 2 A403 1 A402 CORRIDOR 150 172A 3 A403 1 A451 S4S4S6S6 S6S15 S6 L1-B2 167C163B166BYOGA 165 S15 S13 S13 S12 S12 2 5 ' - 1 1 /2 "1 9 ' - 7 "5 ' - 0 "1 ' - 9 "167A162AL1-B1168 B1B1 S4 S14 2 A451 3 A451 S6 37' - 0"24' - 0"37' - 0"36' - 11 3/8" 32' - 4"24' - 0"37' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0 1/4"18' - 0"160R100BS8 S8 S8 S8 S8 S8 S8 S7 S8 S15 DN (TO GARAGE) 5 ' - 6 1 /2" 5' - 6 " 3 0' - 0 " 30 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 6 " T Y P3' - 1 "175BWOMENS LOCKER ROOM 163 WORKROOM 177 CONFERENCE ROOM 175 OFFICE 176 OFFICE 174 CO WORKING 173 UNIT S1 128 UNIT A4 126 UNIT A3-3 123 UNIT BD6-1 121 UNIT BD4-1 113 UNIT A3-1 111 UNIT B3-2 109 UNIT A3-1 107 UNIT B2-2 105 UNIT B6 101UNIT A1-2 103 UNIT B2 - TYPE A 110 UNIT A3-2 108 UNIT B3-1 106 UNIT B3 104UNIT B1-1 112 UNIT S2-1 116 CORRIDOR 160 CORRIDOR 160 162B 166CUNIT A2 102 175A B1 JANITOR CLOSET 152 152UNIT S5 100 5' - 0"30' - 0"5' - 6"30' - 0"2 4 ' - 0 "1 4 ' - 4 1/2 "31' - 0 1/2"120' - 7 1/2"UNIT S3-1 114 167DA701 428°3' - 7"6' - 0"4' - 0"16' - 4 5/8"4' - 0"10' - 6"3' - 7"28' - 11 1/8"28' - 11 1/8"3' - 7" 7' - 8" 4' - 0"18' - 0"4' - 0" 10' - 6" 4' - 0" 6' - 4" 4' - 0" 10' - 6" 4' - 0"16' - 8" 5' - 2" 2' - 0" 6 1/2"164A16' - 3"4' - 0" 10' - 6" 4' - 0" 6' - 0" 4' - 0" 10' - 6" 4' - 0"18' - 0"4' - 0" 10' - 6" 4' - 0" 6' - 8" 4' - 0" 10' - 6" 4' - 0" 7' - 6" 3' - 7" 5' - 7" 3' - 7" 11' - 2" 3' - 7"18' - 1"3' - 7" 11' - 5 1/2" 3' - 7"17' - 0"4' - 0" 8' - 6" 3' - 7" 3' - 0" 4' - 7" 7' - 10" 4' - 7" 6 1/2" 2' - 4" 3' - 6"EQ EQ 6 1/2" K B1 B3 A3 A3 B4 B5 L BC B6 BD 13 16 19 PCE CC CD CB CA 2221 C1 C2 C C B B 23 2311.921 AA AC AE BB BA CC.6 CC.6 A2 A2 H.5 BA.0 M B2 13' - 3 1/2"12' - 4"12' - 4"29' - 2"18' - 8" 3' - 6" 10' - 5" 4' - 1" 8' - 4 7/8" 3' - 7" 6' - 8" 3' - 7" 10' - 2" 3' - 7" 7' - 3 3/4" 3' - 7" 10' - 2" 3' - 7"26' - 3 3/8"4' - 0" 3 ' - 6 "1 0 ' - 6 "4 ' - 0 "8 ' - 5 "3 ' - 7 "6 ' - 6"3 ' - 7"1 1 ' - 2"2 0 ' - 5 "4 ' - 1 1 /2 "3' - 7"10' - 6"4' - 0"16' - 4 5/8"4' - 0"6' - 0"4' - 1"7' - 6"26' - 5 1/4"A741 3 /3 A151 SEE FOR ENLARGED LOBBY & AMENITY AREA PLAN 172B 174176 177 164B164C 5 A404 2 A404 7' - 0"19' - 5"8' - 5" 2' - 10" 7' - 0"25' - 4"4' - 8" 5' - 6"13' - 10" 4' - 8" 8' - 10"23' - 6"3' - 10" 10" 19' - 4"10' - 11" 6' - 1 1/2" 2' - 4" 5' - 4"4' - 8" 8' - 8" 4' - 8"2' - 0" 5' - 2" 3' - 4"EQ EQ 3' - 4" 5' - 2" 2' - 0"4' - 0"12' - 8"3' - 4" 5' - 2" 2' - 0"EQ EQ EQ EQ 3' - 4" 5' - 2" 2' - 0"EQ EQ 11' - 4 1/4"EQ EQ EQ EQEQ EQ EQ EQ EQ EQ EQ EQ5' - 0"6' - 9" 4' - 3"EQ EQ 3' - 4" 5' - 2" 2' - 0"EQ EQ 3' - 4" 5' - 2" 2' - 0"EQ EQ 4' - 0" 9' - 4" 4' - 8"EQ EQ2' - 0" 5' - 2" 3' - 4"EQ EQ 3' - 4" 5' - 2" 2' - 0"EQ EQ EQ EQ EQ EQ 6 1/2" 3' - 0" 5' - 2" 1' - 11" 6 1/2" 4' - 6" 9' - 1" 4' - 6"EQ EQ 6 1/2" 1' - 11 109/128"5' - 2"3' - 2 83/128" 6 1/2" 27' - 0"24' - 0"28' - 9"18' - 4 3/4" 10' - 1 1/2" EQ EQ 6 1/2" EQ EQ 6 1/2"6 1/2" EQ EQ 3' - 6" 3' - 9 3/4" 6 1/2"6 1/2" EQ EQ 10' - 11"12' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 2 3/4" 15' - 8 3/8"7' - 2" 3' - 5"4' - 0 1/2"6' - 1"EQ EQ 9' - 8" 4' - 0" 10' - 6" 4' - 0" 13' - 8" 4' - 0" 9' - 4" 4' - 0" 13' - 0" 4' - 0" 10' - 6" 4' - 0" 4' - 1 1/8" 5' - 2 7/8"2' - 3" 6' - 2" 4' - 7"20' - 0"4' - 2" 8' - 10 1/8" 4 ' - 0 "2 2 ' - 6 "4 ' - 0 "1 8 ' - 4 "4 ' - 0 "1 0 ' - 6 "4 ' - 0 "6 ' - 4 "4 ' - 0 "1 0 ' - 2 "2 7 ' - 0 "1 2 ' - 9 "2 3 ' - 7 "2 4 ' - 0 "11 ' - 4 "31' - 9" 5 ' - 9 1 /8 "4 ' - 1 1 /2 "7' - 6 1 /2 "33 ' - 4 1 /8"E Q E Q E Q E Q E Q E Q 8 ' - 2"4 ' - 4 "6 1 /2 "8 ' - 2 "1 ' - 1 1 "6 1 /2 "E Q E Q 1 ' - 8 "3' - 2 "3 ' - 0 1 /2 "6 1 /2"1 ' - 8 "3 ' - 1 1 "3 ' - 5 "1 ' - 6 "2 ' - 0 "5 ' - 2 "3 ' - 4 "5 ' - 9 "8' - 1 1 "3' - 8 "5' - 2 "4 ' - 2 "1 ' - 1 0 "7 ' - 2 "4 ' - 2"W5EQEQEQEQ7' - 6"8' - 10 5/8"6' - 0"4' - 6"2' - 0"5' - 2 5/16"3' - 3 11/16"1' - 3 5/8"4' - 5"5' - 2"5' - 6"EQEQ5' - 0"1' - 5"6 1/2"11' - 4 1/4"47' - 8 3/4"17' - 8 1/8"18' - 7 1/8"22' - 7 1/8"43' - 0"12' - 4 5/8" 1 4 ' - 5 "3 ' - 7 1 /8 "3' - 7 1/8"1 1' - 2 3/4 " 1 3' - 0 1/4 " 1 4' - 0 " 5' - 1 3/8"10' - 6"6 ' - 1 3/8 " 2 1' - 8 3/4 " 4' - 0 1/2 " 2 1 ' - 8 3 /4" 4 ' - 0 1 /2" 2 1' - 8 3/4"3' - 0"5' - 0"11 1/4"8' - 0"11 1/4"8' - 6 3/4"10' - 7 1/4"4' - 0"12' - 4 3/8"5' - 2"4' - 8"150 1 7 ' - 2 1 /2 "37' - 6 3/8"3' - 7"6 1/2"5' - 0"11' - 11 3/8"3' - 5 3/4"9' - 9"6 1/2"25' - 0 1/4"11' - 11 7/8"1' - 11 3/4"2' - 8"6 1/2" 2' - 4"14' - 2"29' - 4"14' - 0 1/2"5' - 7 1/2"16' - 6" 8' - 6 1/2"4' - 1"7' - 5 1/2"6 1/2"5' - 7 1/2"10' - 8 1/2"31' - 2"12' - 4 1/2"5' - 7 1/2"6 1/2"2' - 1"2' - 11"6 1/2"E Q E Q 3 ' - 0 "B2 B2 B2 37' - 0"24' - 0"39' - 1 1/2"169BMAILROOM 170 169C 165B 59' - 2 1/2" /1 A152 SEE FOR ENLARGED COURTYARD PLAN 3' - 6"S16 4 ' - 1 1/2 "8 ' - 0 "4 ' - 0 "10 ' - 5 "3 ' - 8 1 /2 "3 ' - 8 1/2 "7 ' - 0 "163A 4' - 5 7/8" 5' - 3 3/4" 8' - 4" 4' - 4"EQ EQ163C163D6 1/2"6 1/2"3' - 0" 3' - 9" 9' - 11" 3 ' - 5 1 /4 "E Q E Q 5 ' - 8 "4 ' - 6 "1' - 9 "14 A A A1 A1 AREA WELL 1 P64 g 1 P44 g A1.1 A1.1 AD 6 7 8 953 11 12 15 1718 20 S M.9 ELEV LOBBY 180 ELEV LOBBY 190169A178 A/V CLOSET 178 BF CC.5 16' - 8 1/2"20' - 3 1/2"2' - 7 3/4"21' - 0"28' - 6 3/4" 4' - 0" 10' - 6" 4' - 0" 6' - 4" 4' - 0" 8' - 0" 4' - 0" 10' - 6" 4' - 0" 10' - 0" 4' - 0" 11' - 4 1/4" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 7' - 0" 4' - 0"17' - 11 3/4"4' - 0" 8' - 0" 3' - 7"3' - 8 1/2" TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2021 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2021.rvt10/5/2021 5:11:01 PMTDE, DJR JDE 2286-05 A101 LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES A101 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 07/02/2021 SD SET 09/10/2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET 10/05/2021 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN DN DN UP DN UP DN A.1A.1 STAIR A L2-A ELEVATOR A MECH - A 251 STAIR B L2-B ELEVATOR C TRASH 261 OPEN TO DRIVE BELOW OPEN TO LOBBY BELOW GAME ROOM 264 DD EE N J BE 4 10 9.2 ELEC/DATA 262 7.2 1 A501 1 A501 2 A501 2 A501 2 A401 3 A402 OUTDOOR DECK 251 L2-A262 L2-B CORRIDOR 250 CORRIDOR 250 2 A402 4 A402 1 A401 3 A404 4 A404 1 A404 1 A403 2 A403 1 A402 3 A403 1 A451 24' - 0"13' - 6"23' - 6"24' - 0"37' - 0"24' - 0" S13 S13 264B 265 2 A451 3 A451 S13 S4 UNIT A3-4 227 UNIT B2-4 234 UNIT A5-2 230 UNIT A5-1 228 UNIT B5-1 225 UNIT B3-3 223 UNIT B2-3 226 UNIT A1-3 224 UNIT B4-1 222 UNIT BD6-1 221 UNIT S4-1 220 UNIT S2-2 218 UNIT S2-1 216 UNIT S3-1 214 UNIT BD4-1 213 UNIT B1-1 212 UNIT B3-1 210 UNIT A3-2 208 UNIT B3-1 206 UNIT B3 204 UNIT A2 202 UNIT BD5-1 201 UNIT A1-2 203 UNIT B2-2 205 UNIT A3-1 207 UNIT B2 - TYPE A 209 UNIT A3-1 211 UNIT BD2-1 200 24' - 0"37' - 0"20' - 2" UNIT A1-4 232 2 4 ' - 0 "25' - 2 1/4"S3 S10 A702 5 A701 5 K B1 B3 A3 A3 B4 B5 L BC B6 BD 13 16 19 PCE CC CD CB CA 2221 C1 C2 C C B B 23 2311.921 AA AC AE BB BA CC.6 CC.6 A2 A2 H.5 H.5 BA.0 M B2 /2 A151 SEE FOR ENLARGED AMENITY AREA PLAN 5' - 0"S13264A266 5 A404 2 A4044' - 0"5' - 0"11 1/4"8' - 0"11 1/4"5' - 0"3' - 11 5/8"250 8' - 3 7/8"4' - 0"6' - 4"4' - 0"11' - 5"3' - 7"6 1/2"2' - 6 1/2" 7' - 5"6 1/2"5' - 0"6 1/2" 4' - 4" E Q E Q 9' - 2" 3' - 4" 5' - 2" 2' - 0" 7" 2' - 8 5/8"4' - 6 3/8"1' - 9" 7"6 1/2"2' - 1 1/4"4' - 6 3/8"2' - 5 3/8" 6 1/2"4' - 10" 13' - 1 1/4"5' - 3 1/2"5' - 11"7' - 8" GOLF SIMULATOR 265 MECH 266 ELEVATOR B 261 CORRIDOR 260 3 ' - 7 1 /8 "8 ' - 1 "3 ' - 7 "3 ' - 7"1 1 ' - 6 "E Q E Q 6 1 /2 "3 ' - 3 "5 ' - 2 "2 ' - 0 "6 1 /2 "6 1/2 "1 ' - 1 1 "5 ' - 2 "3 ' - 0 "6 1 /2"3 ' - 4 "5 ' - 3 "1 ' - 11 "1' - 8" 2 ' - 0 "6 1/2"3' - 6 1/2"3' - 11"7' - 9"7' - 4"1' - 3 5/8"3' - 4"5' - 2"2' - 0"1' - 3 1/2"7' - 9 1/8"7' - 4"3' - 6"S12 S12 S1 S1 S12 S1 EQEQEQEQ4' - 3"7' - 2"E Q E Q 1' - 4" 4' - 9" 3' - 1"4' - 5" 9' - 3" 3' - 7 3/4" 3' - 8" 4 ' - 0"3 ' - 10 1 /2 "6 1 /2 "4' - 0" 3' - 10 3/8" 6 1/2"2' - 0" 5' - 2" 3' - 3"EQEQ6 1/2 "3' - 7"8' - 0"3' - 7 1/8"3 ' - 7 "EQ EQ 14 A A A1 A1 A1.1 A1.1 AD 6 7 8 953 11 12 15 17 18 20 S M.9 /1 A101 SEE FOR TYPICAL DIMENSIONS AND ANNOTATION ELEV LOBBY 280 ELEV LOBBY 290 12 A637 4' - 1 1/2"BF CC.5 TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2021 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2021.rvt10/5/2021 5:11:07 PMTDE, DJR JDE 2286-05 A102 LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES A102 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 07/02/2021 SD SET 09/10/2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET 10/05/2021 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN UP UPDN DN STAIR A L3-A ELEVATOR A MECH - A 351 STAIR B L3-B ELEVATOR C ELEVATOR B MECH - B 363 TRASH 361 N ELEC/DATA 362 1 A501 1 A501 2 A501 2 A501 2 A401 3 A402 L3-A351 362 363 L3-B CORRIDOR 350 2 A402 4 A402 1 A401 3 A404 4 A404 1 A404 1 A403 2 A403 1 A402 3 A403 1 A451 S12 3 A451 UNIT BD3 336 UNIT A1 332 UNIT B2 334 UNIT A5 330 UNIT A3 331 UNIT BD1 333 UNIT A3 327 UNIT B5 325 UNIT B2-1 323 UNIT A5 328 UNIT B2 326 UNIT A1 324 UNIT B4 322 UNIT BD6 321 UNIT S4 320 UNIT S2 318 S12 UNIT S2 316 UNIT S3 314 UNIT B1 312 UNIT B2-1 310 UNIT A3 308 UNIT B2-1 306 UNIT A3 311 UNIT BD4 313 UNIT B2-1 309 UNIT A1 - TYPE A 307 UNIT B2 305 UNIT A1 303 UNIT BD5 301 UNIT BD2 300 UNIT A2 302 UNIT B2-1 304 9' - 4"33' - 10" A702 6 A701 6 3' - 7" 7' - 8" 4' - 0"18' - 0"4' - 0" 10' - 6" 4' - 0" 6' - 4" 4' - 0" 10' - 6" 4' - 0"16' - 8"4' - 0" 10' - 6" 4' - 0" 6' - 4" 4' - 0" 8' - 0" 4' - 0" 10' - 6" 4' - 0" 10' - 0" 4' - 0" 11' - 4 1/4" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 7' - 0" 4' - 0"17' - 11 3/4"4' - 0" 8' - 0" 3' - 7" 4' - 0" 10' - 6" 4' - 0" 6' - 0" 4' - 0" 10' - 6" 4' - 0"18' - 0" 4' - 0" 10' - 6" 4' - 0" 6' - 8" 4' - 0" 10' - 6" 4' - 0" 7' - 6" 3' - 7" 5' - 7" 3' - 7" 11' - 2" 3' - 7"18' - 1" 3' - 7" 11' - 5 1/2" 3' - 7" 17' - 0"4' - 0" 8' - 6" 3' - 7" C2 23 23 CC.6 CC.6 H.5 BA.0 A741 4 3' - 6" 10' - 5" 4' - 1" 8' - 4 7/8" 3' - 7" 6' - 8" 3' - 7" 10' - 2" 3' - 7" 7' - 3 3/4" 3' - 7" 10' - 2" 3' - 7"26' - 3 3/8"3' - 7" 1 1 ' - 8 1 /8 "3 ' - 7 "1 4 ' - 5 "4 ' - 0 "8 ' - 0 "3 ' - 7 "11' - 7 1/8"3' - 7"6' - 0"4' - 0"16' - 4 5/8"4' - 0"10' - 6"3' - 7"28' - 11 1/8"3' - 7"10' - 6"4' - 0"16' - 4 5/8"4' - 0"6' - 0"3' - 7"1 0 ' - 2 "4 ' - 0 "6 ' - 4"4 ' - 0 "1 0 ' - 6 "4 ' - 0 "1 8 ' - 4 "4 ' - 0 "1 0 ' - 6 "12 ' - 0 "4 ' - 0 "3' - 7"8' - 0"4' - 0"16' - 0"4' - 0"8' - 0"3' - 7" 9' - 2" 4' - 0" 10' - 6" 4' - 0" 13' - 8" 4' - 0" 9' - 4" 4' - 0" 13' - 0" 4' - 0" 10' - 6" 4' - 0" 15' - 4 1/256" 4' - 0" 8' - 0" 3' - 7"29' - 9" 5 A404 2 A404 350361 5"EQ EQ 4' - 8" 8' - 8" 4' - 8"2' - 0" 5' - 2" 3' - 4"6' - 4"3' - 4" 5' - 2" 2' - 0"EQ EQ EQ EQ 4' - 0"12' - 8"3' - 4" 5' - 2" 2' - 0"EQ EQ EQ EQ EQ EQ 3' - 4" 5' - 2" 2' - 0"EQ EQ EQ EQ 11' - 4 1/4"EQ EQ EQ EQ 5' - 7 9/16" 8' - 0 3/16" 4' - 4"EQ EQ 5" 2' - 8" 7' - 5"12' - 4 5/8"8' - 8"4' - 0"6' - 4"4' - 0"11' - 5"3' - 7"11' - 11 3/8"EQEQ4' - 3"7' - 2"EQEQ5" 2' - 6" 3' - 6"EQ EQ4' - 7" 7' - 10" 4' - 7"5" 2' - 1 45/128" 5' - 2"3' - 4 19/128" 5"4' - 6" 9' - 1" 4' - 6"5" 3' - 2" 5' - 2" 2' - 0" 5"EQ EQEQ EQEQ EQ 5"3' - 4" 5' - 2" 2' - 0"EQ EQ2' - 0" 5' - 2" 3' - 4"4' - 0" 9' - 4" 4' - 8"EQ EQEQ EQ3' - 4" 5' - 2" 2' - 0"EQ EQ3' - 4" 5' - 2" 2' - 0"EQ EQ6' - 9" 4' - 3" 3 ' - 0 "4 ' - 2"7 ' - 1 0 "6 ' - 0 "5 ' - 2 "3 ' - 8 "8' - 1 1 "5 ' - 9 "E Q E Q 3 ' - 4 "5 ' - 2"2 ' - 0 "E Q E Q E Q E Q 1' - 4" 4' - 9" 3' - 1"3' - 4" 5' - 2" 2' - 0"4' - 5" 9' - 3"EQ EQ 8' - 4 1/8" 4' - 7 7/8"EQ EQ2' - 0" 5' - 2" 3' - 4"4' - 0" 7' - 4" 4' - 0"EQEQ 5" 6' - 0"2' - 5"3' - 8"EQEQ4' - 2"7' - 8"4' - 2"EQEQ3' - 9" 5" 2' - 0" 3' - 8"15' - 8 3/8"7' - 2" 3' - 5"5"2' - 2 3/4"4' - 6 3/8"2' - 6 7/8"5"3' - 7 3/4" 3' - 8"5"2' - 10 5/8"4' - 6 3/8"1' - 11" 5"EQ EQ5"EQ EQ2' - 0" 5' - 2" 3' - 3"1' - 8" 2 ' - 0 "2 ' - 0 "5 ' - 2 "3 ' - 4 "E Q E Q 5 "3 ' - 7 "2 0 ' - 5"1 1 ' - 2 "3 ' - 7 "6 ' - 6 "3 ' - 7 "8 ' - 5 "4 ' - 0 "1 0 ' - 6 "3 ' - 6 "1 1 ' - 6 "5 "3 ' - 5 "5' - 2 "2 ' - 1"5"E Q E Q 5 "2 ' - 0 "5 ' - 2 " 3' - 2 "5 "4 ' - 4"8' - 2 "3 ' - 8 1 /2 "3' - 8 1 /2 "7 ' - 0 "E Q E Q 3 ' - 5 "2 ' - 5 "6 3 /4 "5"3' - 8"EQEQ7' - 9"7' - 4"1' - 3 5/8"3' - 4"5' - 2"2' - 0"11' - 4 1/4"5' - 0"1' - 7"5"5' - 2" 2' - 2"5"5"2' - 0"5' - 2 5/16"3' - 3 11/16"1' - 3 1/2"7' - 9 1/8"7' - 4"EQEQ261' - 3"149' - 7 1/8"169' - 8 1/2"80' - 0"66' - 0 1/2"A A A1 A1 S ELEV LOBBY 380 ELEV LOBBY 390 FP-4 37' - 0"19' - 4"37' - 0" BF CC.5 TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2021 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2021.rvt10/5/2021 5:11:13 PMTDE, DJR JDE 2286-05 A103 LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES A103 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 07/02/2021 SD SET 09/10/2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET 10/05/2021 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN DN DN UP UP N 1 A501 1 A501 2 A501 2 A501 2 A401 3 A402 TRASH 461 ELEC/DATA 462 MECH-B 463 STAIR B L4-B ELEVATOR C ELEVATOR D MECH - A 451 ELEVATOR A STAIR A L4-A 462 463 L4-B 451 L4-ACORRIDOR 450 2 A402 4 A402 1 A401 3 A404 4 A404 1 A404 1 A403 2 A403 1 A402 3 A403 1 A451 3 A451 UNIT BD3 436 UNIT BD1 433 UNIT A3 431 UNIT A3 427 UNIT B5 425 UNIT A1 432 UNIT B2 434 UNIT A5 430 UNIT A5 428 UNIT B2 426 UNIT A1 424 UNIT B2-1 423 UNIT BD6 421 UNIT B4 422 UNIT S4 420 UNIT S2 418 450 UNIT S2 416 UNIT S3 414 UNIT BD4 413 UNIT A3 411 UNIT B2-1 409 UNIT A3 407 UNIT B2 405 UNIT A1 403 UNIT BD5 401 UNIT PH7 P402 UNIT B2-1 404 UNIT B2-1 406 UNIT A3 408 UNIT B2-1 410 UNIT B1 412 0"C2 23 23 CC.6 CC.6 H.5 BA.0 5 A404 2 A404461A A A1 A1 4' - 0" 6' - 8" 4' - 0" 9' - 4" 4' - 0" 7' - 3 3/4" 4' - 0" 9' - 4" 4' - 0" 4' - 8" 4' - 8" S /1 A103 SEE FOR TYPICAL DIMENSIONS AND ANNOTATION ELEV LOBBY 480 ELEV LOBBY 490 BF CC.5 8"3' - 4"6" TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2021 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2021.rvt10/5/2021 5:11:26 PMTDE, DJR JDE 2286-05 A104 LEVEL 4 FLOOR PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES A104 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 LEVEL 4 FLOOR PLAN ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 07/02/2021 SD SET 09/10/2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET 10/05/2021 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN N 1 A501 1 A501 2 A501 2 A501 2 A401 3 A402 TRASH 561 ELEC/DATA 562 MECH - B 563 STAIR B L5-B ELEVATOR C ELEVATOR D MECH - A 551 ELEVATOR ASTAIR A L5-A 563562 L5-B L5-A551 CORRIDOR 550 CORRIDOR 550 2 A402 4 A402 1 A401 3 A404 4 A404 1 A404 1 A403 2 A403 1 A402 3 A403 1 A451 3 A451 C2 23 23 CC.6 CC.6 H.5 BA.0 UNIT BD1 533 UNIT A3 531 UNIT A3 527 UNIT B5 525 UNIT B2-1 523 UNIT BD3 536UNIT A1 532 UNIT B2 534 UNIT A5 530 UNIT B2 526 UNIT A1 524 UNIT B4 522 UNIT S4 520 UNIT S2 518 UNIT S2 516 UNIT S3 514 UNIT B2-1 510 UNIT A3 508 UNIT B2-1 506 UNIT B2-1 504 UNIT PH7 P502 UNIT A1 503 UNIT B2 505 UNIT A3 507 UNIT B2-1 509 UNIT A3 511 UNIT BD4 513 UNIT BD6 521 UNIT B1 512 UNIT BD5 501 UNIT A5 528 5 A404 2 A404 550 561 A A A1 A1 S /1 A104 SEE FOR TYPICAL DIMENSIONS AND ANNOTATION ELEV LOBBY 580 ELEV LOBBY 590 BF CC.5 TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2021 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2021.rvt10/5/2021 5:11:39 PMTDE, DJR JDE 2286-05 A105 LEVEL 5 FLOOR PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES A105 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 LEVEL 5 FLOOR PLAN ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 07/02/2021 SD SET 09/10/2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET 10/05/2021 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN UP N 1 A501 1 A501 2 A501 2 A501 2 A401 3 A402 TRASH 661 ELEC/DATA 662 MECH - B 663 STAIR B L6-B ELEVATOR C ELEVATOR D STAIR A L6-A ELEVATOR A MECH - A 651 663662 L6-B CORRIDOR 650 CORRIDOR 650 L6-A651 2 A402 4 A402 1 A401 3 A404 4 A404 1 A404 1 A403 2 A403 1 A402 3 A403 1 A451 3 A451 C2 23 23 CC.6 CC.6 H.5 BA.0 UNIT BD3 636 UNIT BD1 631UNIT A3 629 UNIT A1 632 UNIT B2 634 UNIT A3 627 UNIT B5 625 UNIT A5 630 UNIT B2 626 UNIT B2-1 623 UNIT S4 620 UNIT S2 618 UNIT B4 622 UNIT S2 616 UNIT S3 614 UNIT B2-1 610 UNIT B2-1 604 UNIT PH7 P602 UNIT A1 603UNIT B2 605 UNIT A3 607UNIT B2-1 609 UNIT A1 624 UNIT A3 608 UNIT B2-1 606 UNIT A3 611 UNIT BD4 613 UNIT B1 612 UNIT BD5 601 UNIT BD6 621 UNIT A5 628 5 A404 2 A404 661 650 A A A1 A1 S /1 A105 SEE FOR TYPICAL DIMENSIONS AND ANNOTATION ELEV LOBBY 680 ELEV LOBBY 690 BF CC.5 TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2021 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2021.rvt10/5/2021 5:11:44 PMTDE, DJR JDE 2286-05 A106 LEVEL 6 FLOOR PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE A106 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 LEVEL 6 FLOOR PLAN ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 09/10/2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET 10/05/2021 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN DN DN UP UP STAIR A L7-A ELEVATOR A MECH - A 751 STAIR B L7-BELEVATOR C ELEVATOR B PRIVATE DINING/PARTY ROOM 766 TRASH 761 N ELEC/DATA 762 1 A501 1 A501 2 A501 2 A501 2 A401 3 A402 OUTDOOR DECK 763 L7-B 762 751 L7-ACORRIDOR 750 STAIR D L7-D 701 2 A402 4 A402 1 A401 3 A404 4 A404 1 A404 1 A403 2 A403 1 A402 3 A403 1 A451 3 A451 766AMEN'S RESTROOM 764 WOMEN'S RESTROOM 765 MECH - B 763 UNIT PH5 P722 UNIT PH3 P724 UNIT PH1 P731 UNIT B5 725 UNIT BD6 721 UNIT PH2 P718 UNIT BD4 713 UNIT A3 711 UNIT B2-1 709 UNIT A3 707 UNIT B2 705 UNIT PH6 - TYPE A P701 UNIT PH4 P702 UNIT A3 708 UNIT B2-1 710UNIT B1 712 UNIT S3 714 UNIT S2 716 UNIT B2-1 704 UNIT B2-1 706 UNIT B2-1 723 UNIT A3 727 A701 8 C2 23 23 CC.6 CC.6 H.5 BA.0 /1 A151 SEE FOR ENLARGED AMENITY AREA PLAN A721 6 8' - 3"3' - 6"5 A404 2 A4045' - 6"20' - 0"30' - 0"5' - 6"20' - 0 1/128"5 ' - 5 3 /4" 2 5 ' - 0" 5 ' - 6 "30' - 0"5' - 6"30' - 0"761 750 7647654' - 4"6' - 0"6' - 0"8' - 9"3' - 9"62' - 3"57' - 9 7/8"28' - 10"4' - 0"8' - 5"4' - 0"12' - 7"4' - 5"4' - 6"5' - 2"2' - 11"2' - 2"3' - 6"2' - 9"4' - 0"17' - 0"4' - 0"26' - 0 5/8"4' - 0" 13' - 9" 4' - 0"16' - 8 5/8"20' - 10 1/2" 6' - 6"9' - 6"11' - 0"6' - 0"7' - 0"12' - 0"6' - 3" 7' - 6"4' - 8" 5' - 5" 3' - 11"4' - 0 "6 ' - 6 "4 ' - 0"1 0 ' - 4 "4 ' - 0 "1 6 ' - 1 0 "4 ' - 0 "1 0 ' - 8 "4 ' - 0 "8 ' - 0 "4' - 0 "9 ' - 6 "4 ' - 0"E Q E Q 2' - 0 "5 ' - 2 "3 ' - 2 "1 2 ' - 6"4 ' - 4 "5 ' - 4 "5' - 4 "E Q E Q 4 ' - 0 "5 ' - 6 "5 ' - 5 "1 3 ' - 1 0 1 /8 "3' - 8"9' - 8"4' - 0"10' - 0"4' - 0"14' - 6 5/8"3' - 7"28' - 11 1/8"10' - 0"4' - 10"9' - 8 5/8"3' - 0"7' - 8"3' - 6"8' - 2"3' - 6"15' - 2"18' - 3 1/2"10' - 6 1/2"55' - 6"75' - 0"2' - 1"2' - 11"58' - 6 1/4"1' - 11 3/4"2' - 2"3' - 8"5' - 10"3' - 6"EQEQEQEQ7' - 1"3' - 8"2' - 0"3' - 6 1/4"55' - 6"8' - 0" A A A1 A18' - 0"3' - 4"S /1 A106 SEE FOR TYPICAL DIMENSIONS AND ANNOTATION ELEV LOBBY 780 ELEV LOBBY 790A02A02A02A02A02A02A02A02A02 A02 A02 A02 FT-1 A02 A02 A02A02A02A02A02A02A02L7-D A02766B20' - 0" A637 13 BF CC.5 R.D. (+2") (+10") R.D. (+2") (+10") R.D. (+2") (+10") R.D. (+2") (+10") R.D. (+2") (+10") R.D. (+2") (+10") R.D. (+2") (+10") R.D. (+2") (+5") R.D. (+2") (+5")R.D. (+2") (+5") R.D. (+2") (+5")R.D. (+2") (+10") R.D. (+2") (+10") R.D. (+2") (+10") R.D. (+2") (+10") R.D. (+2") (+10") R.D. (+2") (+5") R.D. (+2") (+5") R.D. (+2") (+5") (+5") R.D. (+2") TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2021 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2021.rvt10/5/2021 5:12:03 PMTDE, DJR JDE 2286-05 A107 LEVEL 7 FLOOR PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES A107 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 LEVEL 7 FLOOR PLAN ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 07/02/2021 SD SET 09/10/2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET 10/05/2021 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN DWNN PHOTOVOLTAIC ZONE (SOLAR READY) 1 A501 1 A501 2 A501 2 A501 ELEV OVERRUN GARDEN PLOTS MECH UNIT RESTAURANT VENTING MECH UNIT ROOF HATCH COORDINATE ROOF ANCHOR LAYOUTS WITH FUTURE SOLAR PANEL LAYOUT R-D R000GUARDRAIL AT WALKWAY R-BCOORDINATE ROOF ANCHOR LAYOUTS WITH GARDEN PLOT DESIGN ROOF DRAIN AND OVERFLOW DRAIN (TYP) A702 9 C2 C2 23 23 CC.6 H.5 BA.0 A721 7 TRASH CHUTE VENTING 1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0" 1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0" 1 /4 " / 1 '-0 "1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0" 1 /4 " / 1 '-0 " 1 /4 " / 1 '-0 "1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0" 1 /4 " / 1 '-0 "1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1 '-0 "1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0" 1/4" / 1'-0" 1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0" 1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"ELEV OVERRUN A A1 S BF CC.5 TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2021 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2021.rvt10/5/2021 5:12:07 PMTDE, DJR JDE 2286-05 A140 ROOF PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE A140 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 ROOF ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES ROOF PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLANS FOR OVERALL DIMENSIONS. 2. ROOF SLOPES ARE INDICATED WITH ARROWS, POINTING IN THE DOWNWARD SLOPE DIRECTION. TYPICAL ROOF SLOPES (STRUCTURE) ARE 1/4 INCH PER FOOT, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 3. ROOF INSULATION AND CRICKETS SHALL BE TAPERED TO DRAIN AT 1/4 INCH PER FOOT, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 4. ROOF INSULATION OVER SLOPED ROOF STRUCTURE SHALL BE A CONSTANT THICKNESS TO MEET OVERALL MINIMUM R-VALUE REQUIRED AS DETAILED ON SHEET A601, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AREAS WITH TAPERED INSULATION, CRICKETS, AND/OR ROOF DRAINS. 5. INSULATION THICKNESS AT ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE A 3" MINIMUM. 6. INSULATION THICKNESS NOTED ON PLANS REPRESENTS ADDITIONAL INSULATION THICKNESS BEYOND MINIMUM R-VALUE THICKNESS REQUIRED FOR THE ROOF ASSEMBLY. 7. COORDINATE ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS AND CURBS RELATED TO ROOF MOUNTED EQUIPMENT WITH MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL, AND OTHER TRADES. NOT ALL PENETRATIONS AND ROOF-MOUNTED ITEMS MAY BE INDICATED ON THIS DRAWING. 8. INSTALL CRICKETS WHERE NEEDED TO SHED WATER AWAY FROM EQUIPMENT, CURBS, OR OTHER ROOF-MOUNTED ITEMS. SLOPE CRICKETS A MINIMUM OF 1/4 INCH PER FOOT. 9. AT ALL ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT CURBS, PROVIDE FULL DEPTH INSULTATION INSIDE OF ROOF CURBS AND WRAPS AROUND SUPPLY AND RETURN DUCTS AS THEN PENETRATE THE ROOF STRUCTURE. 10. VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL STRUCTURE COMPONENTS BELOW ROOF DRAIN LOCATIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 07/02/2021 SD SET 09/10/2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET 10/05/2021 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANR000R-BCOORDINATE ROOF ANCHOR LAYOUTS WITH GARDEN PLOT DESIGN 1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0" ELEV OVERRUN LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 176' - 10" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4"11' - 6"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"12' - 0"76' - 10"6 A551 1 A553 FSDG-1TBR-1 STN-1 ? W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 S8 S8 S8 S8 W4W4 W7 W4 W1 S8 S8 W4 W4 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 AE03AE01AE02AE04 FSDG-1 AE09 R100B E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E09160 W4W4 E07 W2W2 AE12AE10FBR-1 AE17 W4 W4 W4 W4E07 W4 E09 W2 W5 AE01 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 AE04AE11 AE18 AE19AE19 LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 176' - 10" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4"12' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"11' - 6"76' - 10"W1 W1 W1 W1 S6S4S4 S6 S15 AE03 S4 W4 W4 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 W7 E07 R000 1 A551 2 A551 1 A555 2 A555 5 A551 4 A551 FBR-1 AE06 S4 3 A551 AE17 S11 E07 S2 W7 W7 S6 E07 S42 S42 S42 S42 S42 S6 S42 S42 S42 S42 S42W4 W4 W4 W4 ? @ STAIR @ STAIR TBR-1 FSDG-1 AE12 AE01 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 FSDG-1 STN-1 AE10 AE04 S4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 AE18 AE19 AE19 EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND FBR-1 FACE BRICK STN-1 STONE MASONRY FSDG-1 CEMENT BOARD SIDING AND TRIM DARK GREY U.N.O DCMU-1 DECORATIVE CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT MP-1 METAL PANEL - COPPER FINISH MP-2 METAL PANEL CEILINGS - COPPER FINISH FSDG-2 FIBER CEMENT PANEL - LIGHT BUFF MP-3 METAL PANEL - DARK GRAY FINISH GLEN GARY - S804 ASPEN TEXTURE: VELOUR SIZE: UTILITY STACKING: 1/3 RUNNING BOND KASOTA STONE - NATURAL COLOR TEXTURE: TBD SIZE: TBD STACKING: VARIOUS 8", 12", 16" JAMES HARDIE VERTICAL PANEL SYSTEM PREFINISHED PAINT - SW 7069, IRON ORE TEXTURE: SMOOTH JAMES HARDIE VERTICAL PANEL SYSTEM PREFINISHED PAINT TEXTURE: SMOOTH NOT USED AMCON CMU TEXTURE: SPLIT FACE SIZE: 8" X 16" STACKING: 1/2 RUNNING BOND CENTRIA IW-10A COLOR: 9963XL (COPPER METALLIC) PREFINISHED PAINT TEXTURE: SMOOTH ALTERNATE: FIRESTONE DELTA CONCEALED FASTENER PANEL 12 TINCEILING XPRESS - LINCOLN COPPER TILE: COSMOPOLITIAN 2' X 2' CENTRIA IW-10A COLOR: 9921 CHARCOAL GRAY PREFINISHED PAINT TEXTURE: SMOOTH ALTERNATE: FIRESTONE DELTA CONCEALED FASTENER PANEL 12 TBR-1 THIN BRICK GLEN GARY - S804 ASPEN TEXTURE: VELOUR SIZE: UTILITY STACKING: 1/3 RUNNING BOND G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering B K V R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2021 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2021.rvt10/5/2021 5:29:30 PMBMZ JDE 2286-05 A401 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 4917 EDEN AVE EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES AE01 PREFINISHED METAL RAILING AE02 PREFINISHED METAL BALCONY AE03 PREFINISHED METAL CANOPY (BASIS OF DESIGN: MAPES) - COLOR TO MATCH MP-1 AE04 PREFINISHED METAL COPING - COLOR TO MATCH FIBER CEMENT PANEL AE06 MAGIC PACK LOUVERS - COLOR TO MATCH ADJACENT FIBER CEMENT PANEL AE09 PREFINISHED METAL CANOPY (BASIS OF DESIGN: MAPES) - COLOR TO MATCH MP-3, ALL 7TH FLOOR CANOPIES TO BE DEDUCT ALTERNATE AE10 BRICK SOLDIER COURSING AE11 MECHANICAL LOUVER - COLOR TBD AE12 PREFINISHED METAL COPING - COLOR TO MATCH BRICK AE17 WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE AE18 BRICK DETAILING, REFER TO ENLARGED ELEVATIONS ON A451 AE19 FIBER CEMENT DETAILING, REFER TO ENLARGED ELEVATIONS ON A451 A401 3/32" = 1'-0" 2 NORTH ELEVATION 2 A401 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 NORTH ELEVATION 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION GENERAL NOTES 1. PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS FOR ALL CLADDING MATERIALS AS PER PRODUCT MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. LOCATE THEM AT INTERIOR CORNERS WHERE POSSIBLE. SUBMIT CONTROL JOINT AND EXPANSION JOINT LAYOUTS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. 2. TERMINATE CLADDING MATERIALS AT GRADE WITH MINIMUM DISTANCE OFF THE GROUND SURFACE AS PER PRODUCT MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE DETAILED ON THE DRAWINGS. 3. PROVIDE MASONRY LEDGES 8" MINIMUM BELOW FINISH GRADE WHERE MASONRY VENEER OCCURS ON PERIMETER OF BUILDING. 4. PROVIDE MINIMUM 3'-0" CLEARANCE FROM EXHAUST LOUVERS TO PROPERTY LINES AND TO OPERABLE OPENINGS, AND MINIMUM 10'-0" CLEARANCE BETWEEN EXHAUST AND AIR INTAKE LOUVERS AS PER APPLICABLE INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODES/ 5. PROVIDE MINIMUM 30'-0" CLEARANCE FROM GENERATOR FLUE OUTLET TO PROPERTY LINES AND 10'-0" TO OPERABLE OPENINGS, AND MINIMUM 10'-0" CLEARANCE ABOVE ADJOINING GRADE AS PER APPLICABLE INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODES. 6. PROVIDE MINIMUM 10'-0" CLEARANCE FROM PARKING GARAGE EXHAUST LOUVER TO PROPERTY LINES AND 10'-0" TO OPERABLE OPENINGS, AND MINIMUM 10'-0" CLEARANCE ABOVE ADJOINING GRADE AS PER APPLICABLE INTERNATIONAL MECHANCAL CODES. ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 07/02/2021 SD SET 09/10/2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET 10/05/2021 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" LEVEL P1 89' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 176' - 10" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4"11' - 6"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"12' - 0"11' - 0"76' - 10"W1 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4W4 W4 W4 W4W4 W4 W4 W2 W5 W5 W5 W5 W4 W4W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4W4 W4 W4 W4 W4W4 W4 W4 W4 W4W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W5 W5W5 W5 W5 W4 W4W4W4 W4 W4 W4 W4W4W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 S43W5 FSDG-1TBR-1 AE01AE02 AE06 STN-1 FSDG-1 AE07DCMU-1 P105A P1-A2 E09 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E09E09 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E09E09 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 AE11 AE12 AE10 3 A555 5 A555 3 A553 4 A553 FBR-1 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W5 E07 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W5 W5 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 S42 W4 S42 S42 S42 S42 S42W4 W4 E07 5 A553 W5 W5 AE03 E07 E07 W5 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 AE18 AE19 AE19 LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 176' - 10" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4"11' - 6"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"12' - 0"76' - 10"W7 W4 W4 W4 S8 S7 W4 W4W7 W5 W4 W4 W4 W4 W6 W6 W3 W4 W7 W5 W5 W5 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 FBR-1 STN-1 MP-1 AE01 AE02 AE03 AE06 AE04 4 A554 FSDG-1 FSDG-1AE08 S12 S12 S12 S12 S12 S8 R100A E09 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E09 AE10 2 A553 TBR-1 AE17 W4 W7 W7 W7 W7 W7 W7 W7 W7 S12 S12 S12 S12 S12 S12 S12 S12 S12 S12 S12 S5 S14 S5 S1S1S42 S42 S42 S42 S42 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 AE12 AE09 E07 W4 W4 E07 AE18 AE19 AE19 LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 176' - 10" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4"11' - 6"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"12' - 0"76' - 10"W6 W4 STN-1 AE01 AE04 S15 AE12 AE10 ? W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 S15 W4 W4 W4 W4 FBR-1 ? AE02 AE11 AE18AE19 LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 176' - 10" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4"11' - 6"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"12' - 0"76' - 10"W4 W3 FSDG-1TBR-1 AE03 AE02 AE04 AE12 W4 W4 W4 W4 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 UNITS FBR-1 STN-1 AE10 AE01 AE18AE19AE06 EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND FBR-1 FACE BRICK STN-1 STONE MASONRY FSDG-1 CEMENT BOARD SIDING AND TRIM DARK GREY U.N.O DCMU-1 DECORATIVE CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT MP-1 METAL PANEL - COPPER FINISH MP-2 METAL PANEL CEILINGS - COPPER FINISH FSDG-2 FIBER CEMENT PANEL - LIGHT BUFF MP-3 METAL PANEL - DARK GRAY FINISH GLEN GARY - S804 ASPEN TEXTURE: VELOUR SIZE: UTILITY STACKING: 1/3 RUNNING BOND KASOTA STONE - NATURAL COLOR TEXTURE: TBD SIZE: TBD STACKING: VARIOUS 8", 12", 16" JAMES HARDIE VERTICAL PANEL SYSTEM PREFINISHED PAINT - SW 7069, IRON ORE TEXTURE: SMOOTH JAMES HARDIE VERTICAL PANEL SYSTEM PREFINISHED PAINT TEXTURE: SMOOTH NOT USED AMCON CMU TEXTURE: SPLIT FACE SIZE: 8" X 16" STACKING: 1/2 RUNNING BOND CENTRIA IW-10A COLOR: 9963XL (COPPER METALLIC) PREFINISHED PAINT TEXTURE: SMOOTH ALTERNATE: FIRESTONE DELTA CONCEALED FASTENER PANEL 12 TINCEILING XPRESS - LINCOLN COPPER TILE: COSMOPOLITIAN 2' X 2' CENTRIA IW-10A COLOR: 9921 CHARCOAL GRAY PREFINISHED PAINT TEXTURE: SMOOTH ALTERNATE: FIRESTONE DELTA CONCEALED FASTENER PANEL 12 TBR-1 THIN BRICK GLEN GARY - S804 ASPEN TEXTURE: VELOUR SIZE: UTILITY STACKING: 1/3 RUNNING BOND G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2021 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2021.rvt10/5/2021 5:29:42 PMBMZ JDE 2286-05 A402 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 4917 EDEN AVE EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES AE01 PREFINISHED METAL RAILING AE02 PREFINISHED METAL BALCONY AE03 PREFINISHED METAL CANOPY (BASIS OF DESIGN: MAPES) - COLOR TO MATCH MP-1 AE04 PREFINISHED METAL COPING - COLOR TO MATCH FIBER CEMENT PANEL AE06 MAGIC PACK LOUVERS - COLOR TO MATCH ADJACENT FIBER CEMENT PANEL AE07 INSULATED SECTIONAL OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR - COLOR TO MATCH WINDOW FRAME AE08 FIRE TREATED LUMBER PERGOLA AE09 PREFINISHED METAL CANOPY (BASIS OF DESIGN: MAPES) - COLOR TO MATCH MP-3, ALL 7TH FLOOR CANOPIES TO BE DEDUCT ALTERNATE AE10 BRICK SOLDIER COURSING AE11 MECHANICAL LOUVER - COLOR TBD AE12 PREFINISHED METAL COPING - COLOR TO MATCH BRICK AE17 WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE AE18 BRICK DETAILING, REFER TO ENLARGED ELEVATIONS ON A451 AE19 FIBER CEMENT DETAILING, REFER TO ENLARGED ELEVATIONS ON A451 A402 3/32" = 1'-0" 4 SOUTH ELEVATION A402 3/32" = 1'-0" 2 WEST ELEVATION A402 3/32" = 1'-0" 3 WEST COURTYARD NORTH ELEVATION A402 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 WEST COURTYARD SOUTH ELEVATION ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 07/02/2021 SD SET 09/10/2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET 10/05/2021 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 176' - 10" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4"11' - 6"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"12' - 0"76' - 10"3 A554 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W5 W5 W5 W7W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W7W4W4 FSDG-1AE01AE02 STN-1 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E09 E09 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 AE12AE10AE04TBR-1 1 A554 2 A554 AE17 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W5 W5 W5 W7 W7 W7 W7 W7 S16 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 FBR-1 AE06 S9 AE18 AE19 AE19 LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 176' - 10" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4"11' - 6"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"12' - 0"76' - 10"W4 W4 S6 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4W4 W4 W4 W4 S4 W4 W4 W7 W4 W4 FSDG-1 TBR-1 STN-1 AE02 FSDG-1 W4 L1-B1162A E07 E07 E07 E07 167A AE12AE10AE04 E07 E07 E07 FBR-1 164A AE17 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 E07 E07 E07 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 E07 E07 E07 W4W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 S42 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 AE01AE06 AE18 AE19 AE19 LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 176' - 10" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4"11' - 6"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"12' - 0"76' - 10"STN-1FSDG-1MP-1 AE05 FSDG-1 S14 S12 S12 S12 S12 S12 AE17 S12 S12 S12 S12 S12 S12S1 S12 S14S5 S1 S1 S1 S1 S1 EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND FBR-1 FACE BRICK STN-1 STONE MASONRY FSDG-1 CEMENT BOARD SIDING AND TRIM DARK GREY U.N.O DCMU-1 DECORATIVE CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT MP-1 METAL PANEL - COPPER FINISH MP-2 METAL PANEL CEILINGS - COPPER FINISH FSDG-2 FIBER CEMENT PANEL - LIGHT BUFF MP-3 METAL PANEL - DARK GRAY FINISH GLEN GARY - S804 ASPEN TEXTURE: VELOUR SIZE: UTILITY STACKING: 1/3 RUNNING BOND KASOTA STONE - NATURAL COLOR TEXTURE: TBD SIZE: TBD STACKING: VARIOUS 8", 12", 16" JAMES HARDIE VERTICAL PANEL SYSTEM PREFINISHED PAINT - SW 7069, IRON ORE TEXTURE: SMOOTH JAMES HARDIE VERTICAL PANEL SYSTEM PREFINISHED PAINT TEXTURE: SMOOTH NOT USED AMCON CMU TEXTURE: SPLIT FACE SIZE: 8" X 16" STACKING: 1/2 RUNNING BOND CENTRIA IW-10A COLOR: 9963XL (COPPER METALLIC) PREFINISHED PAINT TEXTURE: SMOOTH ALTERNATE: FIRESTONE DELTA CONCEALED FASTENER PANEL 12 TINCEILING XPRESS - LINCOLN COPPER TILE: COSMOPOLITIAN 2' X 2' CENTRIA IW-10A COLOR: 9921 CHARCOAL GRAY PREFINISHED PAINT TEXTURE: SMOOTH ALTERNATE: FIRESTONE DELTA CONCEALED FASTENER PANEL 12 TBR-1 THIN BRICK GLEN GARY - S804 ASPEN TEXTURE: VELOUR SIZE: UTILITY STACKING: 1/3 RUNNING BOND G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2021 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2021.rvt10/5/2021 5:05:43 PMBMZ JDE 2286-05 A403 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 4917 EDEN AVE EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES AE01 PREFINISHED METAL RAILING AE02 PREFINISHED METAL BALCONY AE04 PREFINISHED METAL COPING - COLOR TO MATCH FIBER CEMENT PANEL AE05 PREFINISHED METAL COPING - COLOR TO MATCH METAL PANEL AE06 MAGIC PACK LOUVERS - COLOR TO MATCH ADJACENT FIBER CEMENT PANEL AE10 BRICK SOLDIER COURSING AE12 PREFINISHED METAL COPING - COLOR TO MATCH BRICK AE17 WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE AE18 BRICK DETAILING, REFER TO ENLARGED ELEVATIONS ON A451 AE19 FIBER CEMENT DETAILING, REFER TO ENLARGED ELEVATIONS ON A451 A403 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 COURTYARD NORTH ELEVATION 1 A403 3/32" = 1'-0" 2 COURTYARD NORTH ELEVATION 3 A403 3/32" = 1'-0" 3 COURTYARD WEST ELEVATION ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 07/02/2021 SD SET 09/10/2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET 10/05/2021 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 176' - 10" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4"12' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"11' - 6"76' - 10"W4 W1 W1 W1 W1 W4 W2 W5 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 S42 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4W1 W4 W1 W4 W4S42 W1 W4 W1W4 W4 W4 W4 W4W4W4 W4 W4 W4W4 W4 W4 W4W4W4 W4 W4 W4 W4W4W4 W4 W4 W4W4 W4 W4 W4W4 W5 W5 W5 W5 W2W5 W5 W5 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W5 W4 W4 W4W4 W4 W4 W5 W4 W4 W4W4 W4 W4 W5W5W5 W4 W4 W4W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4W4 W4W4 W4W4W4 W4 W4 W5 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 FSDG-1 TBR-1 STN-1 AE04AE01 W5 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E09 E09 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E09 E09 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E09 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E07 E09 E07E07 AE12 AE10 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W5W5W5 AE17 FBR-1AE06AE02 W4W1 AE19 AE19 AE19 LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" LEVEL P1 89' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 176' - 10" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4"11' - 6"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"12' - 0"11' - 0"76' - 10"W4 W4 W4 W1 W4 W4 W4 W4 W5 W4 W4 W4 W4 W5 FSDG-1FBR-1AE03 STN-1AE07 AE04FSDG-1 E07 E07 AE12 AE10 6 A555 4 A555 W1 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W7 W7 W7 W7 W4 W7 TBR-1 AE18 AE19 W5 LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 176' - 10" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4"11' - 6"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"12' - 0"76' - 10"W1 W1 W1 S2 S2 W4 S12S12 W1 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 FBR-1AE04 AE01 AE08 S3S10 E07 ? AE12 AE10 FSDG-1 1 A552 AE17 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 S2 TBR-1 AE18 AE19AE19 12 A637 EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND FBR-1 FACE BRICK STN-1 STONE MASONRY FSDG-1 CEMENT BOARD SIDING AND TRIM DARK GREY U.N.O DCMU-1 DECORATIVE CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT MP-1 METAL PANEL - COPPER FINISH MP-2 METAL PANEL CEILINGS - COPPER FINISH FSDG-2 FIBER CEMENT PANEL - LIGHT BUFF MP-3 METAL PANEL - DARK GRAY FINISH GLEN GARY - S804 ASPEN TEXTURE: VELOUR SIZE: UTILITY STACKING: 1/3 RUNNING BOND KASOTA STONE - NATURAL COLOR TEXTURE: TBD SIZE: TBD STACKING: VARIOUS 8", 12", 16" JAMES HARDIE VERTICAL PANEL SYSTEM PREFINISHED PAINT - SW 7069, IRON ORE TEXTURE: SMOOTH JAMES HARDIE VERTICAL PANEL SYSTEM PREFINISHED PAINT TEXTURE: SMOOTH NOT USED AMCON CMU TEXTURE: SPLIT FACE SIZE: 8" X 16" STACKING: 1/2 RUNNING BOND CENTRIA IW-10A COLOR: 9963XL (COPPER METALLIC) PREFINISHED PAINT TEXTURE: SMOOTH ALTERNATE: FIRESTONE DELTA CONCEALED FASTENER PANEL 12 TINCEILING XPRESS - LINCOLN COPPER TILE: COSMOPOLITIAN 2' X 2' CENTRIA IW-10A COLOR: 9921 CHARCOAL GRAY PREFINISHED PAINT TEXTURE: SMOOTH ALTERNATE: FIRESTONE DELTA CONCEALED FASTENER PANEL 12 TBR-1 THIN BRICK GLEN GARY - S804 ASPEN TEXTURE: VELOUR SIZE: UTILITY STACKING: 1/3 RUNNING BOND LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" LEVEL P1 89' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 176' - 10" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4" FSDG-1 DCMU-1 11' - 6"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"12' - 0"11' - 0"87' - 10"AE04 LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 176' - 10" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4" FBR-1 FSDG-1 STN-1 11' - 6"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"12' - 0"76' - 10"AE04 AE12 AE10 G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2021 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2021.rvt10/5/2021 5:06:14 PMBMZ JDE 2286-05 A404 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 4917 EDEN AVE A404 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 COURTYARD SOUTH ELEVATION A404 3/32" = 1'-0" 3 EAST ELEVATION 1 A404 3/32" = 1'-0" 4 EAST ELEVATION 2 EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES AE01 PREFINISHED METAL RAILING AE02 PREFINISHED METAL BALCONY AE03 PREFINISHED METAL CANOPY (BASIS OF DESIGN: MAPES) - COLOR TO MATCH MP-1 AE04 PREFINISHED METAL COPING - COLOR TO MATCH FIBER CEMENT PANEL AE06 MAGIC PACK LOUVERS - COLOR TO MATCH ADJACENT FIBER CEMENT PANEL AE07 INSULATED SECTIONAL OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR - COLOR TO MATCH WINDOW FRAME AE08 FIRE TREATED LUMBER PERGOLA AE10 BRICK SOLDIER COURSING AE12 PREFINISHED METAL COPING - COLOR TO MATCH BRICK AE17 WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE AE18 BRICK DETAILING, REFER TO ENLARGED ELEVATIONS ON A451 AE19 FIBER CEMENT DETAILING, REFER TO ENLARGED ELEVATIONS ON A451 A404 3/32" = 1'-0" 2 SOUTH ELEVATION JOG A404 3/32" = 1'-0" 5 COURTYARD SOUTH ELEVATION JOG ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 07/02/2021 SD SET 09/10/2021 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SET 10/05/2021 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHEET INDEX: G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering B K V R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_LAND_2021.rvt10/6/2021 3:42:05 PMSB BH 2286-05 L001 LANDSCAPE TITLE SHEET 4917 EDEN AVE SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME ISSUE 012021-07-02 SD SET2021-09-10 DD SETISSUE 04ISSUE 05ISSUE 061 - GENERAL INFORMATION L001 LANDSCAPE TITLE SHEET X X X 3 - STANDARD SHEETS L100 SITE - LANDSCAPE PLAN X X X L101 SITE - PLANTING PLAN X X X L140 COURTYARD - LANDSCAPE PLANS X X X L150 ROOFTOP - LANDSCAPE PLANS X X X L300 LANDSCAPE DETAILS X X X GENERAL NOTES 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS RELATING TO THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF WORK. 2. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PLAN LAYOUT AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN AND BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DISCREPANCIES WHICH MAY COMPROMISE THE DESIGN AND/OR INTENT OF THE PROJECT'S LAYOUT. 3. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE WORK AND/OR MATERIALS SUPPLIED. 4. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING ROADS, CURBS/GUTTERS, TRAILS, TREES, LAWNS AND SITE ELEMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. DAMAGE TO SAME SHALL BE REPAIRED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 5. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALIGNMENT AND LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GRADE UTILITIES AND PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PROTECTION FOR SAME BEFORE CONSTRUCTION / MATERIAL INSTALLATION BEGINS (MINIMUM 10'-0" CLEARANCE). 6. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED SO THAT TRENCHES DO NOT CUT THROUGH ROOT SYSTEMS OF ANY EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. 7. EXISTING CONTOURS, TRAILS, VEGETATION, CURB/GUTTER AND OTHER ELEMENTS ARE BASED UPON INFORMATION SUPPLIED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY OTHERS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF SAME. 8. ALIGNMENT AND GRADES OF THE PROPOSED WALKS, TRAILS AND/OR ROADWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO FIELD ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO LOCALIZED TOPOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND TO MINIMIZE TREE REMOVAL AND GRADING. CHANGES IN THE ALIGNMENT AND GRADES MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 9. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE SITE FOR DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANT MATERIAL SELECTIONS AND OTHER SITE CONDITIONS WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL OR WARRANTY. UNDESIRABLE PLANT MATERIAL SELECTIONS OR SITE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORK. 10. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT REPRODUCIBLE AS-BUILT DRAWING(S) OF LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION, IRRIGATION AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION INSTALLATION AND PRIOR TO PROJECT ACCEPTANCE. 11. NO PLANTS WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL FINAL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 12. SOD AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING SHALL BE REPLACED, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 13. WHERE SOD ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF SOD/SEED SHALL BE HELD 1" BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL, SLAB, CURB, ETC. 14. SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTS. ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR IN DRAINAGE SWALES, SOD SHALL BE STAKED SECURELY. 15. PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, ANSI Z60.1. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, DECIDUOUS SHRUBS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 5 CANES AT THE SPECIFIED HEIGHT. ORNAMENTAL TREES SHALL HAVE NO 'V' CROTCHES AND SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 3' FEET ABOVE THE ROOT BALL. STREET AND BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 6' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 16. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE WORK AND/OR MATERIALS SUPPLIED. 17. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ONGOING MAINTENANCE OF NEWLY INSTALLED MATERIALS UNTIL TIME OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE. ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO OWNER ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 18. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANTY NEW PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH ONE CALENDAR YEAR FROM THE DATE OF THE OWNER ACCEPTANCE. NO PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE WILL BE CONSIDERED. 19. PLANTING AREAS (NOT OVER STRUCTURE) RECEIVING GROUND COVER, PERENNIALS, ANNUALS, AND/OR VINES SHALL RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 18" DEPTH OF PLANTING SOIL CONSISTING OF AT LEAST 45 PARTS TOPSOIL, 45 PARTS SCREENED COMPOST OR MANURE AND 10 PARTS SAND. 20. ANNUAL AND PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 4" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO WEED BARRIER. 21. SHRUB BED MASSINGS TO RECEIVE 4" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH FIBER MAT WEED BARRIER. 22. STEEL EDGER TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SHRUBS, PERENNIALS AND ANNUALS WHERE PLANTING BED MEETS SOD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 23. REFER TO CIVIL FOR SITE DEMOLITION INFORMATION. 24. REFER TO CIVIL FOR ADDITIONAL SITE GRADING AND UTILITY INFORMATION 25. IF A DISCREPANCY EXISTS BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF PLANTS SHOWN IN THE PLANT MATERIALS SCHEDULE AND THE PLANS, THE PLANS SHALL GOVERN. 26. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE OUT LOCATION OF ALL PROPOSED TREES FOR APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. IRRIGATION NOTES 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING A PERFORMANCE IRRIGATION PLAN AND SPECIFICATIONS AS PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK WHEN BIDDING. THESE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ORDER AND/OR INSTALLATION. IT SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE THAT SODDED/SEEDED AND PLANTED AREAS ARE IRRIGATED PROPERLY, INCLUDING THOSE AREAS DIRECTLY AROUND AND ABUTTING BUILDING FOUNDATION. 2. SHRUB & PERENNIAL BEDS TO BE IRRIGATED WITH DRIP IRRIGATION. SOD TO BE IRRIGATED WITH SPRAY. 3. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH A WATERING/LAWN IRRIGATION SCHEDULE APPROPRIATE TO THE PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS AND TO PLANT MATERIALS GROWTH REQUIREMENTS. 4. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSURE THAT SOIL CONDITIONS AND COMPACTION ARE ADEQUATE TO ALLOW FOR PROPER DRAINAGE AROUND THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. UNDESIRABLE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORK. IT SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE PROPER SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE IN ALL PLANTING AREAS. 5. COORDINATE IRRIGATION SLEEVING LOCATIONS WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 6. RAIN SENSORS TO BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE IRRIGATION DESIGN. 7. IRRIGATION LIMITS TO EXTEND TO STREET BACK OF CURB. SURVEY NOTES 1. ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING ARE BASED ON AN OWNER-FURNISHED SURVEY. BKV GROUP OFFERS NO GUARANTEE, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, FOR THE ACCURACY OR RELIABILITY OF THE INDICATED EXISTING CONDITIONS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL CRITICAL EXISTING CONDITIONS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EXISTING BUILDING LOCATIONS, UTILITY LOCATIONS AND INVERT ELEVATIONS, AND EXISTING SITE GRADES PRIOR TO THE START OF WORK. 3. ANY OBSERVED DEVIATIONS FROM CONDITIONS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ARCHITECT OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S ATTENTION IMMEDIATELY UPON DISCOVERY. NO WORK SHALL PROCEED IN THE AREAS OF ANY DISCOVERED DEVIATIONS UNTIL THE DIFFERENCES ARE RESOLVED. SITE PLAN NOTES • NO BUILDING SIGNAGE PROPOSED AT THIS TIME. • TRASH/RECYCLING WILL BE COLLECTED WITHIN THE BUILDING AT • GROUND LEVEL. COLLECTION WILL OCCUR ON-SITE WITHIN ENCLOSED LOADING AREAS BY PRIVATE VENDORS. • SNOW WILL BE REMOVED FROM SIDEWALKS. A LIMITED AMOUNT OF SNOW STORAGE IS AVAILABLE ALONG THE STREET BOULEVARDS. ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 10/05/2021 FINAL DEVELOPMENT SET DWDN SKETCH CALLS OUT 3.55 N-S INV? SHOT SAYS 911.02 INV? WHICH ONE? DOES THIS PIPE CONNECT BEEHIVE & STMH? DOES THIS STMH E E 15 18 15 15 22 18 10 3 6 3 3 1 16 3 (12"RCP) CC CC BIT. TRAILSIGN FIBER OPTIC BITUMINOUSBITUMINOUSWillson RoadEden Avenue Group#289Group#291 Group#295Group#296Group#297Group#298Group#299Group#300Group#301 Group#302Group#303Group#304Group#305Group#306Group#307Group#308Group#309Group#311 Group#312Group#313Group#314Group#317Group#318Group#320Group#321 Group#322Group#323Group#324Group#325Group#326Group#327Group#328Group#329Group#330Group#331 Group#319Group#316Group#293Group#315Group#290Group#292Group#294Group#310Group#286Group#287Group#288 Group#289 Group#291 Group#295 Group#296 Group#297 Group#298 Group#299 Group#300 Group#301 Group#302 Group#303 Group#304 Group#305 Group#306 Group#307 Group#308 Group#309 Group#311 Group#312 Group#313 Group#314 Group#317 Group#318 Group#320 Group#321 Group#322 Group#323 Group#324 Group#325 Group#326 Group#327 Group#328 Group#329 Group#330 Group#331 Group#319 Group#316 Group#293 Group#315 Group#290 Group#292 Group#294 Group#310 Group#286 Group#287 Group#288 GRAPHIC LEGEND: CIP STANDARD GRAY CONCRETE, BROOM FINISHED, TYP. TURFGRASS: SOD, IRRIGATED (SEE SPEC) PLANTING BED SURFACING #1: ROCK MULCH, 3" MIN., 3/8" TRAP ROCK, CLEAN PLANTING BED SURFACING #2: HARDWOOD MULCH, 4" MIN., TYP. CIP COLORED CONCRETE (B), CEMSTONE 'MORCHELLA GOLD CPC 144-L', BROOM FINISHED, TYP. SHORTGRASS PRAIRIE, SEED MIX TBD CIP COLORED CONCRETE (A), CEMSTONE 'HARBOR MIST CPC 120- L', BROOM FINISHED, TYP. PEDESTAL PAVER SYSTEM, WAUSAU TILE 'STONEY CREEK SC-40' 16"W X 36"L DOG RUN, 3/4" PEA GRAVEL, CLEAN, 6" MIN. DEPTH, TYP. L140 1 L44 L1 L20 L10 L1 L20 L18 L2 L1 L2 L20 L18 L3 L18 L12 L1 L7 L11L25L7L28 L42 L24 L18 L1 L41 L45 L25 L24 L4 L3 L29 L4 L37 L13 L20 L2 L9 L33 L23 L10 L25 L3 L28 L33 L17 L18 L20 L1 L46 L3 L3 L3 L7 L28 L12 L12 L4 L48 L1 L18 L20 L10 L10 L20 L28 L7 L3 L8 L2 L4 L20 L4 L2 L52 L52 KEY NOTES: TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_LAND_2021.rvt10/6/2021 3:42:13 PMSB BH 2286-05 L100 SITE - LANDSCAPE PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE 1" = 20'-0"L100 1 SITE - LANDSCAPE PLAN ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 10/05/2021 FINAL DEVELOPMENT SET L1 PROPERTY LINE L2 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER; SEE CIVIL FOR EXTERIOR ALIGNMENTS L3 C.I.P. PLAIN CONCRETE WALK; SEE CIVIL L4 C.I.P. COLORED CONCRETE (A), CEMSTONE 'HARBOR MIST' CPC 120-L'; JOINTING PER PLAN, 3/8" SAWN JOINTS, SEE SPEC. L7 C.I.P.PLAIN CONCRETE EXTERIOR STAIR; SEE STRUCTURAL FOR REINFORCING, SEE ARCH. FOR RAILING, FINISH TO MATCH UNIT BALCONIES L9 PRIVATE PATIO, C.I.P. PLAIN CONC., SEE ARCH. FOR STOOP CONNECTION L10 SEGMENTAL BLOCK RETAINING WALL, VERSA-LOK PRODUCT TBD, HEIGHT VARIES SEE CIVIL FOR TOP AND BOTTOM WALL ELEVATIONS, SEE X/L3XX L11 DRY STACKED BLOCK PLANTER WALL WITHOUT CAP BLOCK, ROCHESTER CONCRETE 'CONTEMPORARY WALL' CASCADE COLOR, 20" FINISHED HEIGHT, SEE X/L3XX L12 DRY STACKED BLOCK RETAINING WALL WITHOUT CAP BLOCK, ROCHESTER CONCRETE 'CONTEMPORARY WALL' CASCADE COLOR, HEIGHT VARIES SEE CIVIL FOR TOP AND BOTTOM WALL ELEVATIONS, SEE X/L3XX L13 FESTOON LIGHTING, SEE ELEC. FOR PRODUCT, SEE X/L3XX FOR ATTACHEMENTS L17 RAISED UNIT DECKS, SEE ARCH. L18 TURF GRASS, SOD, INCLUDING IRRIGATION; SEE SPEC L20 PLANTING BED, ROCK MULCH, 3/8" TRAP ROCK, CLEAN, 3" DEPTH, FILTER FABRIC UNDERLAYMENT, PROVIDE AUTOMATED DRIP IRRIGATION AND STEEL LANDSCAPE EDGER; SEE 1 AND 2/L300 SEE 3/L300 FOR STEEL EDGER DETAIL L23 DOG RUN AREA, 3/8" PEA GRAVEL CLEAN, 6" MIN. WITH FILTER FABRIC UNDERLAYMENT, SEE X/LXXX L24 DECORATIVE ROCK MULCH SURFACING, 3/8" TRACK ROCK, CLEAN, 3" MIN. DEPTH, FILTER FABRIC UNDERLAYMENT, TYP. L25 BENCH (A); 'VILNIUS' BY LANDSCAPE FORMS, BLACK ACID ETCHED FINISH, SURFACE MOUNT PER MANUFACT. SPEC(S), (5 TOTAL UNITS) L28 DOGIPOT, DOG WASTE STATION WITH ONE PUL BAG SYSTEM DEPOT-022-B, BLACK FINISH, INSTALLED PER MANUFACT. SPEC(S) WITH CONCRETE FOOTING (4 TOTAL UNITS) L29 FREESTANDING FURNISHINGS; FFE BY OWNER L33 4' STEEL PICKET DOG RUN FENCE, AMERISTAR 'MONTAGE PLUS MAJESTIC STYLE', BLACK POWDERCOATED FINISH, INSTALLED AT GRADE PER MANUFACT. SPEC(S) L37 FREESTANDING PLANTERS (C) WITH SUBSURFACE IRRIGATION CONNECTION; TOURNESOL 'BOULEVARD SQUARE', 48"SQ X 35"T, 'WESTERN RED CEDAR' FINISH (4 TOTAL UNITS) L41 QUARRIED GRANITE BOULDER SEATING (A), 24"W X 18"T X 60"L, SAWN TOP AND BOTTOM, SPLIT FACE SIDES (2 TOTAL UNITS) SEE X/L3XX L42 QUARRIED GRANITE BOULDER SEATING (A), 24"SQ X 18"T, SAWN TOP AND BOTTOM, SPLIT FACE SIDES (4 TOTAL UNITS) SEE X/L3XX L44 SHORTGRASS PRAIRIE SEED MIX, SEED MIX TBD L45 SCULPTURE/ART LOCATIONS, BY OWNER L46 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT PAD, SEE ELEC. FOR EQUIPMENT L48 PARKING GARAGE TRANSITION WELL, SHOWN FOR REFERENCE, SEE ARCH. L52 DECORATIVE METAL SCREEN FENCE, 6' TALL PICKET STYLE WITH PERFORATED METAL BACKING; SEE 3/L300 DWDN SKETCH CALLS OUT 3.55 N-S INV? SHOT SAYS 911.02 INV? WHICH ONE? DOES THIS PIPE CONNECT BEEHIVE & STMH? DOES THIS STMH E E 15 18 15 15 22 18 10 3 6 3 3 1 16 3 (12"RCP) CC CC BIT. TRAILSIGN FIBER OPTIC BITUMINOUSBITUMINOUSWillson RoadEden Avenue UP Group#289Group#291Group#295Group#296Group#297Group#298Group#299Group#300Group#301Group#302Group#303Group#304Group#305Group#306Group#307Group#308Group#309Group#311Group#312Group#313Group#314Group#317Group#318Group#320Group#321Group#322Group#323Group#324Group#325Group#326Group#327Group#328Group#329Group#330Group#331Group#319Group#316Group#293Group#315Group#290Group#292Group#294Group#310Group#286Group#287Group#288Group#289Group#291Group#295Group#296Group#297Group#298Group#299Group#300Group#301Group#302Group#303Group#304Group#305Group#306Group#307Group#308Group#309Group#311Group#312Group#313Group#314Group#317Group#318Group#320Group#321Group#322Group#323Group#324Group#325Group#326Group#327Group#328Group#329Group#330Group#331Group#319Group#316Group#293Group#315Group#290Group#292Group#294Group#310Group#286Group#287Group#288L140 2 GRAPHIC LEGEND: CIP STANDARD GRAY CONCRETE, BROOM FINISHED, TYP. TURFGRASS: SOD, IRRIGATED (SEE SPEC) PLANTING BED SURFACING #1: ROCK MULCH, 3" MIN., 3/8" TRAP ROCK, CLEAN PLANTING BED SURFACING #2: HARDWOOD MULCH, 4" MIN., TYP. CIP COLORED CONCRETE (B), CEMSTONE 'MORCHELLA GOLD CPC 144-L', BROOM FINISHED, TYP. SHORTGRASS PRAIRIE, SEED MIX TBD CIP COLORED CONCRETE (A), CEMSTONE 'HARBOR MIST CPC 120- L', BROOM FINISHED, TYP. PEDESTAL PAVER SYSTEM, WAUSAU TILE 'STONEY CREEK SC-40' 16"W X 36"L DOG RUN, 3/4" PEA GRAVEL, CLEAN, 6" MIN. DEPTH, TYP. PROPOSED PLANT SCHEDULE: TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_LAND_2021.rvt10/6/2021 3:42:19 PMSB BH 2286-05 L101 SITE - PLANTING PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE 1" = 20'-0"L101 1 SITE - PLANTING PLAN QTY SYM COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME PLANTING SIZE PERENNIALS/VINES/ANNUALS 24 ca KARL FORESTER GRASS Calamagrostis x acutiflora 'Karl Forester'#1 CONT. 9 hb BLUE ANGEL HOSTA Hosta 'Blue Angel'#1 CONT. 53 hd DESIGNER GENES HOSTA Hosta 'Designer Genes'#1 CONT. 6 hh HAPPY RETURNS DAYLILY Hemerocallis 'Happy Returns'#1 CONT. 82 pt GREEN CARPET PACHYSANDRA Pachysandra terminalis 'Green Carpet'#1 CONT. 34 sh PRAIRIE DROPSEED Sporobolus Heterolepis #1 CONT. ORNAMENTAL TREES 7 AG AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY Amelanchir x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance'2" CAL. 6 MD GLADIATOR CRABAPPLE Malus x adstringens 'Durleo' (PP20,167)2" CAL. 9 SR IVORY SILK JAPANESE TREE LILAC Syringa reticulata 'Ivory Silk'2" CAL. EVERGREEN SHRUBS 9 Bg CHICAGOLAND GREEN BOXWOOD Buxus X 'Glencoe'#5 CONT. 26 Jc SPARTAN JUNIPER Juniperus chinensis 'Spartan'6' B&B 18 Jm MANEY JUNIPER Juniperus chinensis 'Maneyi'#5 CONT. 20 To TECHNITO ARBORVITAE Thuja occidentalis 'Balijohn'4' H B&B DECIDUOUS TREES 7 AS GREEN MOUNTAIN SUGAR MAPLE Acer saccharum 'Green Mountain'2.5" CAL. 6 BN RIVER BIRCH Betula nigra 2.5" CAL. 6 BP DAKOTA PINNACLE BIRCH Betula platyphylla 'Fargo'2.5" CAL. 1 GB AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO Ginkgo Biloba 'Autumn Gold'2.5" CAL. 8 GT SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST Gleditsia triacanthos var. inermis 'Skycole'2.5" CAL. 6 PT PRAIRIE GOLD ASPEN Populus tremuloides 'NEArb'2.5" CAL. 8 QA QUAKING ASPEN Populous tremuloides #20 CONT. 7 QB SWAMP WHITE OAK Quercus bicolor 2.5" CAL. 5 TA AMERICAN SENTRY LINDEN Tilia americana 'MnKSentry'2.5" CAL. DECIDUOUS SHRUBS 63 Am LOW SCAPE MOUND CHOKEBERRY Aronia melanocarpa 'UCONN 165' (PP28, 789) #2 CONT. 8 Cb IVORY HALO DOGWOOD Cornus alba 'Bailhalo'#5 CONT. 18 Cc SUGARTINA CLETHRA Clethra alnifolia 'Crystalina' (PP21, 561)#2 CONT. 32 Ds BUTTERFLY BUSH HONEYSUCKLE Diervilla sessilifolia 'Butterfly'#5 CONT. 32 Mm IRIQUOIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRY Aronia melanocarpa 'Morten'#5 CONT. 24 Ra ALPINE CURRANT Ribes alpinum #5 CONT. 19 Rg GRO LOW SUMAC Rhus aromatica 'Gro Low'#5 CONT. 52 Rn FLOWER CARPET ROSE Rosa x 'Noamel'#1 CONT. 33 Ss SEM FALSE SPIREA Sorbaria sorbifolia 'Sem'#5 CONT. CONIFEROUS TREES 12 PA NORWAY SPRUCE Picea abies 8' B&B 7 PS WHITE PINE Pinus Strobus 6' B&B ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 10/05/2021 FINAL DEVELOPMENT SET DW18 15 15 18 3 Group#289 Group#291 Group#295 Group#296 Group#297 Group#298 Group#299 Group#300 Group#301 Group#302 Group#303 Group#304 Group#305 Group#306 Group#307Group#308Group#309Group#311Group#312Group#313Group#314Group#317Group#318Group#320Group#321Group#322Group#323Group#324Group#325Group#326Group#327Group#328Group#329Group#330Group#331Group#319Group#316Group#293Group#315Group#290Group#292Group#294Group#310Group#286Group#287Group#288Group#289Group#291Group#295Group#296Group#297Group#298Group#299Group#300Group#301Group#302Group#303Group#304Group#305Group#306Group#307Group#308Group#309Group#311Group#312Group#313Group#314Group#317Group#318Group#320Group#321Group#322Group#323Group#324Group#325Group#326Group#327Group#328Group#329Group#330Group#331Group#319Group#316Group#293Group#315Group#290Group#292Group#294Group#310Group#286Group#287Group#288 UP DW18 15 15 18 3 Group#289Group#291Group#295Group#296Group#297Group#298Group#299Group#300Group#301Group#302Group#303Group#304Group#305Group#306Group#307Group#308Group#309Group#311Group#312Group#313Group#314Group#317Group#318Group#320Group#321Group#322Group#323Group#324Group#325Group#326Group#327Group#328Group#329Group#330Group#331Group#319Group#316Group#293Group#315Group#290Group#292Group#294Group#310Group#286Group#287Group#288Group#289Group#291Group#295Group#296Group#297Group#298Group#299Group#300Group#301Group#302Group#303Group#304Group#305Group#306Group#307Group#308Group#309Group#311Group#312Group#313Group#314Group#317Group#318Group#320Group#321Group#322Group#323Group#324Group#325Group#326Group#327Group#328Group#329Group#330Group#331Group#319Group#316Group#293Group#315Group#290Group#292Group#294Group#310Group#286Group#287Group#288UP GRAPHIC LEGEND: CIP STANDARD GRAY CONCRETE, BROOM FINISHED, TYP. TURFGRASS: SOD, IRRIGATED (SEE SPEC) PLANTING BED SURFACING #1: ROCK MULCH, 3" MIN., 3/8" TRAP ROCK, CLEAN PLANTING BED SURFACING #2: HARDWOOD MULCH, 4" MIN., TYP. CIP COLORED CONCRETE (B), CEMSTONE 'MORCHELLA GOLD CPC 144-L', BROOM FINISHED, TYP. SHORTGRASS PRAIRIE, SEED MIX TBD CIP COLORED CONCRETE (A), CEMSTONE 'HARBOR MIST CPC 120- L', BROOM FINISHED, TYP. PEDESTAL PAVER SYSTEM, WAUSAU TILE 'STONEY CREEK SC-40' 16"W X 36"L DOG RUN, 3/4" PEA GRAVEL, CLEAN, 6" MIN. DEPTH, TYP. L43 L11 L9 L29 L49 L11 L11 L40 L29 L6 L24 L50 L6 L11 L19 L29 L9 L11 L19 L43 L19 L6 L29 L30 L4 L5 L4 L11 L36 L29 L31 L29 L5 L29 L13 L11 L19 L29 L11 L19 L6 L43 L11 L9 L6 L50 L5 L51L21 L11 L4 L32L30L21L29L6 L25 L35 L19 L27 L32 L19 L4 L4 L51 L11 L19 L50 L11 L4 L26 L39 L43 L22 L47 L36 L11 L19 L9 L43 PROPOSED PLANT SCHEDULE: KEY NOTES: TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_LAND_2021.rvt10/6/2021 3:42:27 PMSB BH 2286-05 L140 COURTYARD - LANDSCAPE PLANS 4917 EDEN AVE ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 10/05/2021 FINAL DEVELOPMENT SET 1" = 10'-0"L140 1 COURTYARD - LANDSCAPE PLAN 1" = 10'-0"L140 2 COURTYARD - PLANTING PLAN QTY SYM COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME PLANTING SIZE PERENNIALS/VINES/ANNUALS 24 ca KARL FORESTER GRASS Calamagrostis x acutiflora 'Karl Forester'#1 CONT. 9 hb BLUE ANGEL HOSTA Hosta 'Blue Angel'#1 CONT. 53 hd DESIGNER GENES HOSTA Hosta 'Designer Genes'#1 CONT. 6 hh HAPPY RETURNS DAYLILY Hemerocallis 'Happy Returns'#1 CONT. 82 pt GREEN CARPET PACHYSANDRA Pachysandra terminalis 'Green Carpet'#1 CONT. 34 sh PRAIRIE DROPSEED Sporobolus Heterolepis #1 CONT. ORNAMENTAL TREES 7 AG AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY Amelanchir x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance'2" CAL. 6 MD GLADIATOR CRABAPPLE Malus x adstringens 'Durleo' (PP20,167)2" CAL. 9 SR IVORY SILK JAPANESE TREE LILAC Syringa reticulata 'Ivory Silk'2" CAL. EVERGREEN SHRUBS 9 Bg CHICAGOLAND GREEN BOXWOOD Buxus X 'Glencoe'#5 CONT. 26 Jc SPARTAN JUNIPER Juniperus chinensis 'Spartan'6' B&B 18 Jm MANEY JUNIPER Juniperus chinensis 'Maneyi'#5 CONT. 20 To TECHNITO ARBORVITAE Thuja occidentalis 'Balijohn'4' H B&B DECIDUOUS TREES 7 AS GREEN MOUNTAIN SUGAR MAPLE Acer saccharum 'Green Mountain'2.5" CAL. 6 BN RIVER BIRCH Betula nigra 2.5" CAL. 6 BP DAKOTA PINNACLE BIRCH Betula platyphylla 'Fargo'2.5" CAL. 1 GB AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO Ginkgo Biloba 'Autumn Gold'2.5" CAL. 8 GT SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST Gleditsia triacanthos var. inermis 'Skycole'2.5" CAL. 6 PT PRAIRIE GOLD ASPEN Populus tremuloides 'NEArb'2.5" CAL. 8 QA QUAKING ASPEN Populous tremuloides #20 CONT. 7 QB SWAMP WHITE OAK Quercus bicolor 2.5" CAL. 5 TA AMERICAN SENTRY LINDEN Tilia americana 'MnKSentry'2.5" CAL. DECIDUOUS SHRUBS 63 Am LOW SCAPE MOUND CHOKEBERRY Aronia melanocarpa 'UCONN 165' (PP28, 789) #2 CONT. 8 Cb IVORY HALO DOGWOOD Cornus alba 'Bailhalo'#5 CONT. 18 Cc SUGARTINA CLETHRA Clethra alnifolia 'Crystalina' (PP21, 561)#2 CONT. 32 Ds BUTTERFLY BUSH HONEYSUCKLE Diervilla sessilifolia 'Butterfly'#5 CONT. 32 Mm IRIQUOIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRY Aronia melanocarpa 'Morten'#5 CONT. 24 Ra ALPINE CURRANT Ribes alpinum #5 CONT. 19 Rg GRO LOW SUMAC Rhus aromatica 'Gro Low'#5 CONT. 52 Rn FLOWER CARPET ROSE Rosa x 'Noamel'#1 CONT. 33 Ss SEM FALSE SPIREA Sorbaria sorbifolia 'Sem'#5 CONT. CONIFEROUS TREES 12 PA NORWAY SPRUCE Picea abies 8' B&B 7 PS WHITE PINE Pinus Strobus 6' B&B L4 C.I.P. COLORED CONCRETE (A), CEMSTONE 'HARBOR MIST' CPC 120-L'; JOINTING PER PLAN, 3/8" SAWN JOINTS, SEE SPEC. L5 C.I.P. COLORED CONCRETE (B), CEMSTONE 'MORCHELLA GOLD' CPC 144-L'; JOINTING PER PLAN, 3/8" SAWN JOINTS, SEE SPEC. L6 C.I.P. CONCRETE PLANTER CURB OVER STRUCTURE, 6" W X 6" T X 18" D; SEE X/L3XX L9 PRIVATE PATIO, C.I.P. PLAIN CONC., SEE ARCH. FOR STOOP CONNECTION L11 DRY STACKED BLOCK PLANTER WALL WITHOUT CAP BLOCK, ROCHESTER CONCRETE 'CONTEMPORARY WALL' CASCADE COLOR, 20" FINISHED HEIGHT, SEE X/L3XX L13 FESTOON LIGHTING, SEE ELEC. FOR PRODUCT, SEE X/L3XX FOR ATTACHEMENTS L19 PLANTING BED, HARDWOOD MULCH; 4" DEPTH, PROVIDE AUTOMATED DRIP IRRIGATION AND STEEL LANDSCAPE EDGER; SEE 1 AND 2/L300 SEE 3/L300 FOR STEEL EDGER DETAIL L21 SYNTHETIC TURF SYSTEM, SYNLAWN 'AUGUSTINE X47', INSTALLED PER MANUFACT. SPEC(S) L22 PERGOLA, TREX 'ELEMENT', 12'W X 16'L, JET BLACK FINISH, CONCRETE MOUNTING KIT, INSTALLED PER MANUFACT. SPEC(S) L24 DECORATIVE ROCK MULCH SURFACING, 3/8" TRACK ROCK, CLEAN, 3" MIN. DEPTH, FILTER FABRIC UNDERLAYMENT, TYP. L25 BENCH (A); 'VILNIUS' BY LANDSCAPE FORMS, BLACK ACID ETCHED FINISH, SURFACE MOUNT PER MANUFACT. SPEC(S), (5 TOTAL UNITS) L26 BENCH (B); 'PARALLEL 42 WEDGE 30' BY LANDSCAPE FORMS, 'STEEL' POWDERCOATED FRAME, DSTMA WOOD, SURFACE MOUNTED PER MANUFACT. SPEC(S), (2 TOTAL UNITS) L27 BIKE RACK; DERO "HOOP", STAINLESS FINISH, (4 TOTAL UNITS) SURFACE MOUNTED PER MANUFACT. SPEC(S) L29 FREESTANDING FURNISHINGS; FFE BY OWNER L30 TRASH AND RECYCLING UNIT, LANDSCAPE FORMS 'SELECT' DOUBLE UNIT, BLACK POWDERCOATED FINISH (2 TOTAL UNITS) L31 GAS FIRE PIT; 'ROBATA 72"' BY PALOFORM, 'NOUGAT' COLOR, 'GRAPHITE' POWDER COAT COVER, DARK GREY RIVER ROCK TOPPING, SEE MECH. FOR EMERGENCY SHUT OFF AND TIMER VALVE LOCATIONS L32 6' STEEL PCIKET SECURITY FENCE; AMERISTAR 'MONTAGE PLUS MAJESTIC STYLE', BLACK POWDERCOATED FINISH, INCLUDE FOB KEY ACCESS, PANIC BAR HARDWARE, AND TAMPER PROOF ENTRY PLATE, INSTALLED AT GRADE PER MANUFACT. SPEC(S) L35 FREESTANDING PLANTERS (A) WITHOUT SUBSURFACE IRRIGATION CONNECTION; TOURNESOL 'BOULEVARD SQUARE', 24"SQ X 24"T, 'WESTERN RED CEDAR' FINISH, SEASONAL DECORATIONS BY OWNER (2 TOTAL UNITS) L36 FREESTANDING PLANTERS (B) WITH SUBSURFACE IRRIGATION CONNECTION; TOURNESOL 'BOULEVARD RECTANGLE', 60"L X 18"W X 36"T, 'WESTERN RED CEDAR' FINISH (2 TOTAL UNITS) L39 SPA AREA, SEE POOL VENDOR FOR DRAWINGS L40 BAR RAIL, 'JESSIE' BY LANDSCAPE FORMS, BLACK POWDERCOATED FRAME WITH 3-SLATTED DSTMA BAR TOP, SURFACE MOUNTED PER MANUFACT. SPEC(S). L43 GREEN ROOF BLANKET SYSTEM, SEMPER GREEN 'STANDARD SEDUM MIX', INSTALLED PER MANUFACT. SPEC(S) L47 BUILT-IN NATURAL GAS BAR AND GRILL STATION, GRANITE COUNTERTOP, BRICK CLADDING TO MATCH BUILDING SEE X/L3XX L49 PEDESTAL PAVER SYSTEM, WAUSAU TILE 'STONEY CREEK SC-40', 16"W X 36"L, INSTALLED PER MANUFACT. SPEC(S) L50 STEPPER STONE PAVERS, DRY LAID, WAUSAU TILE 'STONEY CREEK SC-40', 16"W X 36"L, INLAID IN MULCH BURRIED 1" BELOW FINISHED MULCH HEIGHT L51 C.I.P. COLORED CONCRETE (A) SLOPED WALK (5% MAX SLOPE), CEMSTONE 'HARBOR MIST' CPC 120-L'; JOINTING PER PLAN, 3/8" SAWN JOINTS, SEE SPEC. DWDW18 15 10 3 3 1 SIGN FIBER OPTIC Group#289Group#291Group#295Group#296Group#297Group#298Group#299Group#300Group#301Group#302Group#303Group#304Group#305Group#306Group#307Group#308Group#309Group#311Group#312Group#313Group#314Group#317Group#318Group#320Group#321Group#322Group#323Group#324Group#325Group#326Group#327Group#328Group#329Group#330Group#331Group#319Group#316Group#293Group#315Group#290Group#292Group#294Group#310Group#286Group#287Group#288 Group#289Group#291Group#295Group#296Group#297Group#298Group#299Group#300Group#301Group#302Group#303Group#304Group#305Group#306Group#307Group#308Group#309Group#311Group#312Group#313Group#314Group#317Group#318Group#320Group#321Group#322Group#323Group#324Group#325Group#326Group#327Group#328Group#329Group#330Group#331Group#319Group#316Group#293Group#315Group#290Group#292Group#294Group#310Group#286Group#287Group#288 DWDWE E 18 15 3 SIGN FIBER OPTIC Group#289Group#291Group#295Group#296Group#297Group#298Group#299Group#300Group#301Group#302Group#303Group#304Group#305Group#306Group#307Group#308Group#309Group#311Group#312Group#313Group#314Group#317Group#318Group#320Group#321Group#322Group#323Group#324Group#325Group#326Group#327Group#328Group#329Group#330Group#331Group#319Group#316Group#293Group#315Group#290Group#292Group#294Group#310Group#286Group#287Group#288 Group#289Group#291Group#295Group#296Group#297Group#298Group#299Group#300Group#301Group#302Group#303Group#304Group#305Group#306Group#307Group#308Group#309Group#311Group#312Group#313Group#314Group#317Group#318Group#320Group#321Group#322Group#323Group#324Group#325Group#326Group#327Group#328Group#329Group#330Group#331Group#319Group#316Group#293Group#315Group#290Group#292Group#294Group#310Group#286Group#287Group#288 CC L49 L49 L49 L49 L49 L38 L49 GRAPHIC LEGEND: CIP STANDARD GRAY CONCRETE, BROOM FINISHED, TYP. TURFGRASS: SOD, IRRIGATED (SEE SPEC) PLANTING BED SURFACING #1: ROCK MULCH, 3" MIN., 3/8" TRAP ROCK, CLEAN PLANTING BED SURFACING #2: HARDWOOD MULCH, 4" MIN., TYP. CIP COLORED CONCRETE (B), CEMSTONE 'MORCHELLA GOLD CPC 144-L', BROOM FINISHED, TYP. SHORTGRASS PRAIRIE, SEED MIX TBD CIP COLORED CONCRETE (A), CEMSTONE 'HARBOR MIST CPC 120- L', BROOM FINISHED, TYP. PEDESTAL PAVER SYSTEM, WAUSAU TILE 'STONEY CREEK SC-40' 16"W X 36"L DOG RUN, 3/4" PEA GRAVEL, CLEAN, 6" MIN. DEPTH, TYP. KEY NOTES: L49 L49 TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_LAND_2021.rvt10/6/2021 3:42:39 PMSB BH 2286-05 L150 ROOFTOP - LANDSCAPE PLANS 4917 EDEN AVE ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 10/05/2021 FINAL DEVELOPMENT SET 1/16" = 1'-0"L150 1 LEVEL 7 TERRACE - LANDSCAPE PLAN 1/16" = 1'-0"L150 2 ROOFTOP GARDEN PLOTS - LANDSCAPE PLAN L49 PEDESTAL PAVER SYSTEM, WAUSAU TILE 'STONEY CREEK SC-40', 16"W X 36"L, INSTALLED PER MANUFACT. SPEC(S) 1" = 10'-0"L150 3 LEVEL 3 TERRACE - LANDSCAPE PLANR000RCOORDINATE ROOF ANCHOR LAYOUTS WITH GARDEN PLOT DESIGN 1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0" 1 /4 " / 1 '-0 "1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0" 1 /4 " / 1 '-0 " 1 /4 " / 1 '-0 "1/ 4 " / 1'-0" ELEV OVERRUN R000RCOORDINATE ROOF ANCHOR LAYOUTS WITH GARDEN PLOT DESIGN 1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0"1/4" / 1'-0" ELEV OVERRUN PERENNIAL PLANT SPACING VARIES; (SEE PLANT MATERIALS SCHEDULE) GENERAL NOTES: • HAND LOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTANERIZED MATERIAL, TYP. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH; (SEE SPEC); 4" DEPTH, TYP. EDGE CONDITION VARIES PER PLAN PLANTING SOIL; (SEE SPEC) 18" MIN. DEPTH UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED SUBGRADE VARIES PER PLAN 1' - 6"VARIES SHRUB PLANT SPACING VARIES; (SEE PLANT MATERIALS SCHEDULE) GENERAL NOTES: • HAND LOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTANERIZED MATERIAL, TYP. • SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF PLANTING PIT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION • CENTERING OF SHRUB IN BED TO TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER DIMENSION FROM EDGE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH; (SEE SPEC); 4" DEPTH, TYP. EDGE CONDITION VARIES PER PLAN PLANTING SOIL; (SEE SPEC) 18" MIN. DEPTH UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED SUBGRADE GENERAL NOTES: • TWO ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF TREE STAKING ARE ILLUSTRATED. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION TO STAKE TREES; HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. • SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING, TYP. 8' 0" STEEL STAKE DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE; 3' @ 120 DEGREE INTERVALS, TYP. 16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE-40 MIL.; 1 1/2" WIDE STRAP, TYP. TREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH OR APPROVED EQUAL, TYP. FLAGGING; ONE PER WIRE, TYP. ORGANIC MULCH; 4" DEPTH-NO MOUNDING; 36" DIA. AROUND OUTER TRUNK, TYP. (SEE SPEC) ROOTBALL TO SIT ON MOUNDED SUBGRADE, TYP. REMOVE BURLAP AND CAGE FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOTBALL DRAIN SYSTEM AS REQUIRED; (PER SPEC) 4" DIA. PERFORATED PVC PIPE WITH SOCK-PLACED IN 42" MIN. DEPTH AUGURED HOLE; FILL WITH 3/4" DRAIN ROCK PLANTING SOIL WITH AMENDMENTS; (SEE SPEC) EDGE CONDITION VARIES; (SEE PLAN) 2" X 2" X 24" WOOD OR STEEL STAKE; SET AT ANGLE, TYP. GENERAL NOTES: • TWO ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF TREE STAKING ARE ILLUSTRATED. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION TO STAKE TREES; HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. • SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING, TYP. • CONIFERS TO HAVE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NO MULCH TO BE IN CONTACT WITH TRUNK, TYP. 8' 0" STEEL STAKE DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE; 3' @ 120 DEGREE INTERVALS, TYP. 16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE-40 MIL.; 1 1/2" WIDE STRAP, TYP. FLAGGING; ONE PER WIRE, TYP. ORGANIC MULCH; 4" DEPTH-NO MOUNDING; 36" DIA. AROUND OUTER TRUNK, TYP. (SEE SPEC) ROOTBALL TO SIT ON MOUNDED SUBGRADE, TYP. REMOVE BURLAP AND CAGE FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOTBALL DRAIN SYSTEM AS REQUIRED; (PER SPEC) 4" DIA. PERFORATED PVC PIPE WITH SOCK-PLACED IN 42" MIN. DEPTH AUGURED HOLE; FILL WITH 3/4" DRAIN ROCK PLANTING SOIL WITH AMENDMENTS; (SEE SPEC) EDGE CONDITION VARIES; (SEE PLAN) 2" X 2" X 24" WOOD OR STEEL STAKE; SET AT ANGLE, TYP.SUBGRADE SUBGRADE6' - 0"2' MIN.G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_LAND_2021.rvt10/6/2021 3:42:40 PMSB BH 2286-05 L300 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 4917 EDEN AVE 3/4" = 1'-0"L300 1 SHRUB AND PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAILS-TYP. 1/2" = 1'-0"L300 2 TREE PLANTING DETAILS-TYP. ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 10/05/2021 FINAL DEVELOPMENT SET 3/4" = 1'-0"L300 3 DECORATIVE METAL SCREEN FENCE DETAIL G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture B K V R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S TR U C TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:27:10 PMAuthor Checker 2286-05 G100 COVER SHEET 4917 EDEN AVE 4917 EDEN AVE 4917 EDEN AVE (EDINA, MN) REUTER WALTON PROJECT LOCATION RENDERING PROJECT TEAMPROJECT SUMMARY (UNIT MATRIX) Architect: Chris Palkowitsch & Mike Krych Boarman Kroos Vogel Group, Inc 222 North Second Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Phone: 612.339.3752 Fax: 612.339.6212 Contact: Architect's Name OWNER / APPLICANT: NICK WALTON OWNER / APPLICANT : REUTER WALTON ADDRESS 1710 W Lake St, Minneapolis, MN 55408 Phone: 612-823-3489 Contact: PERSON Civil: MICHAEL J. ST. MARTIN, PE (MN, WI) COMPANY NAME : Loucks ADDRESS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 Phon 763.496.6713 |C 612.237.8532 Contact: Civil Engineer's Name Landscape: Brady Halverson Boarman Kroos Vogel Group, Inc 222 North Second Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Phone: 612.339.3752 Fax: 612.339.6212 Contact: Landscape Architect's Name Structural Engineering: Lionel Dayton Boarman Kroos Vogel Group, Inc 222 North Second Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Phone: 612.339.3752 Fax: 612.339.6212 Contact: Structural Engineer's Name UNIT MIX - RENTABLE AREA UNIT TYPE UNIT AREA COUNT # RENTABLE / TOTAL AREA UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF 67 46918 SF UNIT A1.1 - 1 BED 746 SF 1 746 SF UNIT A2 - 1 BED 706 SF 7 4941 SF UNIT A2.1 - 1 BED 680 SF 7 4759 SF UNIT A3 - 1 BED 724 SF 11 7966 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF 52 55640 SF UNIT B2 - 2 BED 1060 SF 12 12714 SF UNIT B3 - 2 BED 1036 SF 7 7253 SF UNIT B4 - 2 BED 1161 SF 5 5807 SF UNIT BD1 - 2 BED DEN 1204 SF 6 7221 SF UNIT BD2 - 2 BED DEN 1201 SF 6 7206 SF UNIT BD3 - 2 BED DEN 1203 SF 4 4810 SF UNIT BD4 - 2 BED DEN 1247 SF 4 4990 SF UNIT PH1 - PENTHOUSE 1496 SF 2 2992 SF UNIT PH2 - PENTHOUSE 1448 SF 1 1448 SF UNIT PH3 - PENTHOUSE 1486 SF 1 1486 SF UNIT PH4 - PENTHOUSE 1750 SF 1 1737 SF UNIT PH5 - PENTHOUSE 1694 SF 1 1694 SF UNIT PH6 - PENTHOUSE 1726 SF 1 1726 SF UNIT S1 - ALCOVE 572 SF 12 6863 SF TOTAL: 208 188918 SF SITE ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NO PARKING2 12.0'SERVICE DRIVEWAY DROP OFF EDEN AVE. BUILDING FFE=935.50 GFE=925.00 R 45' 13 16 R 45' R 69' R 21' R 10' R 5' COURTYARD, PATIO/AMENITY AREA (SEE LANDSCAPE) CONCRETE TRANSFORMER PAD (COORD. WITH MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL) 18.0'18.0' 8.5'8.5' DOG PARK (SEE LANDSCAPE) ACCESSIBLE STALL, SIGNS, STRIPING, ETC. TYP. - (SEE DETAIL) RETAINING WALL W/ FENCE WHERE WALL IS OVER 2.5' TALL (SEE GRADING PLAN & LANDSCAPE ) FLAT CURB W/ 3' TAPERS (SEE DETAIL) FENCE (SEE LANDSCAPE) HEAVY-DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP. (SEE DETAIL) FUTURE B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP. (SEE MNDOT) FUTURE HEAVY-DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) FUTURE EXIT RAMP (COORDINATE WITH CITY / MNDOT) CONCRETE SIDEWALK (SEE DETAIL) LOADING ZONE FUTURE DRIVEWAY POOL (SEE LANDSCAPE) 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' GROUND LEVEL RESTAURANT (SEE ARCH.) ALTERNATE OUTDOOR SPACE (SEE ARCH.) RETAINING WALL W/ FENCE WHERE WALL IS OVER 2.5' TALL (SEE GRADING PLAN & LANDSCAPE ) 5.0' 5.0' 10.0' 10.0' 15.0' 15.0' 10.0' 10.0' 10.0' BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP. (SEE DETAIL) BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (MATCH EXISTING SECTION) BITUMINOUS TRAIL (MATCH EXISTING SECTION) B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP. (SEE DETAIL) CONCRETE SIDEWALK (SEE DETAIL) 6.0' CONCRETE SIDEWALK (SEE DETAIL) BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (MATCH EXISTING SECTION) SCULPTURE (SEE LANDSCAPE) 24.0' HEAVY-DUTY CONCRETE APRON (SEE DETAIL) B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP. (SEE DETAIL) CONCRETE RISERS W/ RAILING (SEE GRADING, ARCHITECTURAL, & STRUCTURAL) CONCRETE RISERS W/ RAILING (SEE GRADING, ARCHITECTURAL, & STRUCTURAL) COURTYARD CONCRETE SIDEWALK (SEE DETAIL) 6 HEAVY-DUTY CONCRETE APRON (SEE DETAIL) HEAVY-DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) RETAINING WALL W/ FENCE WHERE WALL IS OVER 2.5' TALL (SEE GRADING PLAN & LANDSCAPE )R 77' R 53' 24.0' 9.0' 18.0' 24.0' 20.0' 9.0' EXISTING MNDOT CONCRETE RETAINING WALL R 5' R 5' R 5' R 5' R 5' R 5' 4.9' FLUSH CURB 9' TAPER 10' TAPER HEAVY-DUTY CONCRETE APRON (SEE DETAIL) SERVICE D R I V E W A Y 6 73 Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Boarman Kroos Vogel Group Inc. EOE License Number I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional under the laws of the State of Minnesota.BKVTB-30x42Engineer Date XX/XX/XXXX24440 Michael J. St. Martin, PE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 21081.00 © 2016 BKV Group, Inc. EOE SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER ISSUE #DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS NOT F O R CON S T R U C TI O N CERTIFICATION DATE 4917 EDEN AVE. 21081.00 XX/XX/XXXX JBT MJS OWNER/DEVELOPER 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL WARNING: AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUNDGopher State One Call SITE PLAN C2-1 REQUIRED SURFACE ACCESSIBLE PARKING:xxx STALLS* *REQUIRED MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES FOR 101-150 STALLS SURFACE ACCESSIBLE PARKING:xxx STALLS ACCESSIBLE PARKING OFF-STREET PARKING CALCULATIONS PROPOSED SURFACE PARKING PROVIDED: 37 STALLS SITE NOTES 1.ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER THE DETAIL SHEET(S) AND STATE/LOCAL JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS. 2.ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL BE PROVIDED PER CURRENT ADA STANDARDS AND LOCAL/STATE REQUIREMENTS. 3.ALL CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4.ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5.TYPICAL FULL SIZED PARKING STALL IS 9' X 18' WITH A 24' WIDE TWO WAY DRIVE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6.ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 3.0' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7.BITUMINOUS IMPREGNATED FIBER BOARD TO BE PLACED AT FULL DEPTH OF CONCRETE ADJACENT TO EXISTING STRUCTURES AND BEHIND CURB ADJACENT TO DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS. 8.SEE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR SITE LIGHTING. CURRENT ZONING:xxx PROPOSED ZONING:xxx BUILDING SETBACK:xxx TOTAL PROPERTY AREA:2.08 AC. AREA OF DISTURBANCE:2.58 AC. EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA:1.82 AC PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA:1.48 AC. SITE DATA SITE PLAN LEGEND CONCRETE SIDEWALK BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT HEAVY-DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SPECIALTY LANDSCAPE PAVING N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 N N NO PARKINGEDEN AVE. BUILDING FFE=935.50 GFE=925.00 922 923 928 923 924 932 93 3 934 9 2 8 4 4 444425.00 8.0% 929 93 0 93 1 9 2 2 9 2 3 FG. 39.3 FS 4.0%FG. 29.0 FS 4.0%8 8 8 8888888 888888888888888888810:138.54± EX. 38.27± EX. 35.72 37.14 33.5233.04 33.14 33.50 33.14 32.14 32.46 32.33 32.28 32.26 31.72 32.21 32.79 32.33 32.36 33.40 33.40 33.5033.50 TW=???.??? TW=30.42 BW=25.00 BW=25.00 BW=22.75 TW=28.72 28.12 TW=28.57 TW=28.35 27.61 27.51 30.46 TW=28.20 BW=24.74 BW=23.50 BW=23.50 25.00 26.82 27.83 27.934.9%5. 9% 2.0%5.0%1. 7%5.5%1.0%4.0%4.0%1.0% 2.7%3.0%2.7%33.33 33.39 28.94 28.68 28.20 5.0%2.0%8.0% 1.0%2.0%0.5%35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.20 35.20 35.20 35.20 35.20 35.20 35.20 35.20 35.2035.2035.2035.20 31.10 31.00 31.50 31.63 31.77 31.84 31.78 32.08 34.87 35.35 34.8535.35 35.35 35.02 34.33 33.95 33.63 33.25 32.96 34.69 2.0% 6.7% 7.4%5.6%1.3%4.0%1.6% 1.6%1.6% 34.18 33.00 33.52 33.19 33.98 1.0% 3. 0 % TW=37.60 TW=37.84 TW=37.84 TW=37.10 TW=37.10 TW=37.10 TW=35.30 TW=35.30 TW=35.20 TW=35.20 TW=35.31 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=33.00 BW=32.58 BW=35.20 37.61± EX.37.50± EX.36.80± EX.36.66± EX.0.7%1.0%2.0%1.5%2.4%3.4%88888888888888888883.5%5.5%7.0%26.77 27.0027.39 27.48 25.0024.89 24.00 25.00 9279269259319339349359349339329 3 7 9 3 6 9 3 5 935 934 935 936 937 938 925932 933934 935936937938 939 34.00 36.57 8888FUTURE FRONTAGE ROAD FUTURE FRONTAGE ROAD FLUSH CURB 9' TAPER 10' TAPER 92 8 4 4 44444444444448.0% 26.82 27.83 27.93 28.94 28.68 28.20 5.0% 2.0%8.0% 33.198 826.77 27.00 27.39 27.48927926 73 Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Boarman Kroos Vogel Group Inc. EOE License Number I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional under the laws of the State of Minnesota.BKVTB-30x42Engineer Date XX/XX/XXXX24440 Michael J. St. Martin, PE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 21081.00 © 2016 BKV Group, Inc. EOE SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER ISSUE #DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS NOT F O R CON S T R U C TI O N CERTIFICATION DATE 4917 EDEN AVE. 21081.00 XX/XX/XXXX JBT MJS OWNER/DEVELOPER 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL WARNING: AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUNDGopher State One Call GRADING PLAN C3-1 N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 N N GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1.SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES, GUTTER/FLOW LINE, FACE OF BUILDING, OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.16 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 3.ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES OF TOP SOIL AND SEED/MULCH OR SOD. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED/MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. 4.FOR SITE RETAINING WALLS "TW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT TOP FACE OF WALL (NOT TOP OF WALL), "GW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT WALL GRADE TRANSITION, AND "BW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT BOTTOM FACE OF WALL (NOT BOTTOM OF BURIED WALL COURSES). 5.STREETS MUST BE CLEANED AND SWEPT WHENEVER TRACKING OF SEDIMENTS OCCURS AND BEFORE SITES ARE LEFT IDLE FOR WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS. A REGULAR SWEEPING SCHEDULE MUST BE ESTABLISHED. 6.DUST MUST BE ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED. 7.SEE SWPPP FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND REQUIREMENTS. 8.SEE UTILITY PLANS FOR WATER, STORM AND SANITARY SEWER INFORMATION. 9.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND BITUMINOUS TAPER LOCATIONS. 10.SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR FINAL SITE STABILIZATION. 11.NOTIFY CITY OF EDINA ENGINEERING DEPT. AT 952-826-0371, AT LEAST 24 HOURS PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF STORMWATER BMP'S. NO PARKINGEDEN AVE. BUILDING FFE=935.50 GFE=925.00 4 4 44448 8 8 8888888 8888888888888888888888888888888888888888888" SANITARY SEWER SERVICE INV=908.36 (VERIFY LOCATION & INV. W/ MECHANICAL) SAN SMH 100 RIM= 927.25 INV(W)= 907.39 INV(S)=907.39 48 LF 8" SANITARY @ 2.00% 270 LF 8" SANITARY @ 2.00% 5 LF - 6" FIRE PROTECTION WATER SERVICE (VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE, & INV. W/ MECHANICAL) 5 LF - 6" DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE (VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE, & INV. W/ MECHANICAL) 6" GV & HYDRANT 22.5° 6" BEND CONNECT TO EX. WATER MAIN (VERIFY LOCATION & SIZE) 30 LF 6" WM 45° 6" BEND 28LF 6" WM 6" GV 4 4 444444444444488REMOVE TOP SECTION OF MANHOLE TO ALLOW FOR DIRECTIONAL BORING, CONNECT TO MANHOLE WITH 2' INSIDE DROP AT 901.07 WITH INSIDE DROP DIRECTIONAL BORE 270 LF OF 8" PVC 8" SANITARY SEWER SERVICE INV=908.36 (VERIFY LOCATION & INV. W/ MECHANICAL) SAN SMH 100 RIM= 927.25 INV(W)= 907.39 INV(S)=907.39 48 LF 8" SANITARY @ 2.00% 270 LF 8" SANITARY @ 2.00% DRILL RIG LOCATION PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER TO BE DIRECTIONALLY BORED TO LIMIT DISTURBANCE TO STREET AND ROOTS OF MATURE TREES LAYDOWN AREA FOR PIPE FUSING AND PULLING 73 Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Boarman Kroos Vogel Group Inc. EOE License Number I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional under the laws of the State of Minnesota.BKVTB-30x42Engineer Date XX/XX/XXXX24440 Michael J. St. Martin, PE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 21081.00 © 2016 BKV Group, Inc. EOE SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS NOT F O R CON S T R U C TI O N CERTIFICATION DATE 4917 EDEN AVE. 21081.00 XX/XX/XXXX JBT MJS OWNER/DEVELOPER 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL WARNING: AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUNDGopher State One Call SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN PLAN C4-1 N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 N N UTILITY NOTES 1.ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN UTILITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS,THE MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, THE LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT , AND THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), LATEST EDITION. 2. ALL UTILITY PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE COMPACTED SAND OR FINE GRANULAR MATERIAL. ALL COMPACTION SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CEAM SPECIFICATION. 3. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONS. THE CITY ENGINEERING INSPECTOR AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, OR WORK IMPACTING PUBLIC UTILITIES. 4. ALL STORM SEWER , SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SERVICES SHALL TERMINATE 5' FROM THE BUILDING FACE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN WATERMAIN AND ALL OTHER UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. ALL NEW WATERMAIN AND SERVICES MUST HAVE A MINIMUM OF 8.0 FEET OF COVER. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST WATERMAIN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, AND SERVICES AS REQUIRED. INSULATION OF WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE 8.0 FEET MINIMUM DEPTH CAN NOT BE ATTAINED. 7. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. ALL SANITARY SEWER WYES, TEES AND SERVICES SHALL BE SCH. 40 PVC. 9. ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATCH BASINS, LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES, CHAPTER 4714. 10. ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT (SEE MINNESOTA RULES, CHAPTER 4714). APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, AND OTHER STRUCTURES. 11. HIGH-DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) STORM DRAINS MUST COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA RULES, CHAPTER 4714: a. PIPES 4-INCH TO 10-INCH IN SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH AASHTO M252. b. PIPES 12-INCH TO 60-INCH IN SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM F2306. c. ALL FITTINGS MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM D3212. d. WATER-TIGHT JOINTS MUST BE USED AT ALL CONNECTIONS INCLUDING STRUCTURES. 12. HYDRANT USE: CONTRACTOR IS NOT PERMITTED TO USE HYDRANTS. ALSO APPLIES TO SUBCONTRACTORS. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE CITY ENGINEERING INSPECTOR AND GIVE AT LEAST 48 HOURS NOTICE TO HAVE WATER SHUT OFF. THE CITY INSPECTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND OPERATE ALL VALVES AND FILL ALL WATER MAINS (PUBLIC AND PRIVATE). CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY IN WRITING, ALL AFFECTED CUSTOMERS AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE BEFORE SHUT OFF; ATTACH DOOR, ET., NOT IN MAILBOXES. 14. TEMPORARY SERVICE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TEMPORARY SERVICE IF SERVICE CANNOT BE RESTORED SAME DAY. IF USING HYDRANT FOR TEMPORARY SERVICE, NOTIFY PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT AND USE ONLY PRE-APPROVED HYDRANT AND SUPPLIED HYDRO METER WITH BACK FLOW. THE CONTRACTOR'S TEMPORARY MAIN SHALL BE DISINFECTED, FLUSHED AND BACTERIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS SHOWN NEGATIVE PRIOR TO PUTTING THE TEMPORARY SYSTEM IN SERVICE. THE TEMPORARY WATER SYSTEM SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT SHUTTING OFF ANY WATER MAINS. 15. SANITARY SEWER MATERIAL: PVC SDR 26 16. WATERMAIN MATERIAL: 6" PVC C900 NO PARKINGEDEN AVE. BUILDING FFE=935.50 GFE=925.00 4 4 44448 8 8 8888888 88888888888888888888888888888888888888888839 LF 12" STORM @ 2.00% CBMH 202 RIM= 926.75 INV(E)=917.22 INV(W)=917.22 CBMH 201 RIM= 924.00 INV(E)=916.70 INV(S)=916.70 CB 203 RIM= 927.55 INV(E)=925.26 CBMH 204 RIM= 927.63 INV(W)=925.06 INV(NE)=924.96 36 LF 12" STORM @ 19.08% 69 LF 12" STORM @ 8.27% BUILD CB OVER EXISTING STORM LINE 84 LF 12" STORM @ 2.27% CBMH 221 RIM= 934.00 INV(S)=919.90 AD 206 RIM=935.20 AD 214 RIM=935.20 AD 215 RIM=935.20 AD 216 RIM=935.20 AD 217 RIM=935.20 AD 213 RIM=935.20AD 2312 RIM=935.20 AD 210 RIM=935.20 AD 211 RIM=935.20 AD 207 RIM=935.20 AD 208 RIM=935.20 AD 209 RIM=935.20 CLEANOUT 231 INV= 921.38 (12") N INV= 918.68 (12") E INV=921.30 (12") W 21 LF 12" STORM @ 2.00% 109 LF 12" STORM @ 2.02% CLEANOUT 232 INV= 919.10 (12") E INV=919.10 (12") N 20 LF 12" STORM @ 2.00% CLEANOUT 233 INV= 918.70 (12") S INV=918.70 (12") W 38 LF 12" STORM @ 1.86% 26 LF 12" STORM @ 2.00% COURTYARD EOF =34.8 AREA DRAINS ALONG GRIDLINES RIM= ±935.2 STORM IN LOWER GARAGE CEILING @2.0% 20 LF 12" STORM @ 1.00% STORM TANK 96" DIA. TOP=921.00 INV=913.00 INV=18.0 INV=18.0 INV=18.0 INV=18.0 DROP STORM DOWN TO LOWER GARAGE INV= ±923.0 TRENCH DRAIN AT BASE OF WALL RIM - 35.3 0.5% PRESLOPE TRENCH DRAIN AT BASE OF WALL RIM - 35.3 0.5% PRESLOPE TRENCH DRAIN AT BASE OF WALL RIM - 35.3 TRENCH DRAIN AT BASE OF WALL RIM - 35.3 62 LF 12" STORM @ 4.32% CBMH 219 RIM= 933.00 INV(N)=928.75 CBMH 220 RIM= 931.78 INV(S)=926.09 INV(W)=925.99 INV(N)=927.39 CBMH 219 (2) RIM= 932.08 INV(S)=927.83 STORM IN GARAGE STORM OUTSIDE CBMH 240 RIM= 924.91 INV(N)=920.66 4 4 44444444444448873 Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering Boarman Kroos Vogel Group Inc. EOE License Number I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional under the laws of the State of Minnesota.BKVTB-30x42Engineer Date XX/XX/XXXX24440 Michael J. St. Martin, PE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 21081.00 © 2016 BKV Group, Inc. EOE SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS NOT F O R CON S T R U C TI O N CERTIFICATION DATE 4917 EDEN AVE. 21081.00 XX/XX/XXXX JBT MJS OWNER/DEVELOPER 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL WARNING: AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUNDGopher State One Call STORM SEWER PLAN C4-2 N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 N N UTILITY NOTES 1.ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN UTILITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS,THE MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, THE LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT , AND THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), LATEST EDITION. 2. ALL UTILITY PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE COMPACTED SAND OR FINE GRANULAR MATERIAL. ALL COMPACTION SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CEAM SPECIFICATION. 3. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONS. THE CITY ENGINEERING INSPECTOR AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, OR WORK IMPACTING PUBLIC UTILITIES. 4. ALL STORM SEWER , SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SERVICES SHALL TERMINATE 5' FROM THE BUILDING FACE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN WATERMAIN AND ALL OTHER UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. ALL NEW WATERMAIN AND SERVICES MUST HAVE A MINIMUM OF 8.0 FEET OF COVER. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST WATERMAIN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, AND SERVICES AS REQUIRED. INSULATION OF WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE 8.0 FEET MINIMUM DEPTH CAN NOT BE ATTAINED. 7. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. ALL SANITARY SEWER WYES, TEES AND SERVICES SHALL BE SCH. 40 PVC. 9. ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATCH BASINS, LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES, CHAPTER 4714. 10. ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT (SEE MINNESOTA RULES, CHAPTER 4714). APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, AND OTHER STRUCTURES. 11. HIGH-DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) STORM DRAINS MUST COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA RULES, CHAPTER 4714: a. PIPES 4-INCH TO 10-INCH IN SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH AASHTO M252. b. PIPES 12-INCH TO 60-INCH IN SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM F2306. c. ALL FITTINGS MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM D3212. d. WATER-TIGHT JOINTS MUST BE USED AT ALL CONNECTIONS INCLUDING STRUCTURES. 12. HYDRANT USE: CONTRACTOR IS NOT PERMITTED TO USE HYDRANTS. ALSO APPLIES TO SUBCONTRACTORS. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE CITY ENGINEERING INSPECTOR AND GIVE AT LEAST 48 HOURS NOTICE TO HAVE WATER SHUT OFF. THE CITY INSPECTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND OPERATE ALL VALVES AND FILL ALL WATER MAINS (PUBLIC AND PRIVATE). CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY IN WRITING, ALL AFFECTED CUSTOMERS AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE BEFORE SHUT OFF; ATTACH DOOR, ET., NOT IN MAILBOXES. 14. TEMPORARY SERVICE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TEMPORARY SERVICE IF SERVICE CANNOT BE RESTORED SAME DAY. IF USING HYDRANT FOR TEMPORARY SERVICE, NOTIFY PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT AND USE ONLY PRE-APPROVED HYDRANT AND SUPPLIED HYDRO METER WITH BACK FLOW. THE CONTRACTOR'S TEMPORARY MAIN SHALL BE DISINFECTED, FLUSHED AND BACTERIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS SHOWN NEGATIVE PRIOR TO PUTTING THE TEMPORARY SYSTEM IN SERVICE. THE TEMPORARY WATER SYSTEM SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT SHUTTING OFF ANY WATER MAINS. 15. STORM SEWER MATERIALS: 12" OR GREATER: HDPE NO PARKINGGRAPHIC LEGEND: CIP STANDARD GRAY CONCRETE, BROOM FINISHED, TYP. TURFGRASS: SOD, IRRIGATED (SEE SPEC) PLANTING BED #1: ROCK MULCH, 4" MIN., MIXED SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS PER PLANT SCHEDULE PLANTING BED #2: HARDWOOD MULCH, 4" MIN., MIXED SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS PER PLANT SCHEDULE CIP COLORED CONCRETE, BROOM FINISHED, TYP. SHORTGRASS PRAIRIE, SEED MIX TBD TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering B K V R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_LAND_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:47:21 PMSB BH 2286-05 L100 SITE - LANDSCAPE PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN 1" = 20'-0"L100 1 SITE - LANDSCAPE PLAN FRONT PLAZA AMENITY SPACE VISITOR PARKING LOT AND TURNAROUND PARKING GARAGE RAMP ENTRANCE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT PAD DENSE TREE PLANTINGS FOR SCREENING SURFACE PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE PERENNIAL AND SHRUB PLANTINGS PER PLANT SCHEDULE SURFACE PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE PERENNIAL AND SHRUB PLANTINGS PER PLANT SCHEDULE SITE RETAINING WALL PARKING LOT CENTRAL AMENITY COURTYARD SPACE SITE RETAINING WALL UNIT WALK UPSPARKING LOT ACCESS DRIVE MAINTAINED TURF STRIP SHORT GRASS PRAIRIE SEED MIX SITE RETAINING WALL SURFACE PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE PERENNIAL AND SHRUB PLANTINGS PER PLANT SCHEDULE DENSE TREE PLANTINGS FOR SCREENING DENSE TREE PLANTINGS FOR SCREENING SURFACE PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE PERENNIAL AND SHRUB PLANTINGS PER PLANT SCHEDULE SURFACE PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE PERENNIAL AND SHRUB PLANTINGS PER PLANT SCHEDULE MOVE-IN AND TRASH ACCESS LANE RESTAURANT PATIO PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE BOUNDARY UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE BOUNDARY NO PARKINGGRAPHIC LEGEND: CIP STANDARD GRAY CONCRETE, BROOM FINISHED, TYP. TURFGRASS: SOD, IRRIGATED (SEE SPEC) PLANTING BED #1: ROCK MULCH, 4" MIN., MIXED SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS PER PLANT SCHEDULE PLANTING BED #2: HARDWOOD MULCH, 4" MIN., MIXED SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS PER PLANT SCHEDULE CIP COLORED CONCRETE, BROOM FINISHED, TYP. SHORTGRASS PRAIRIE, SEED MIX TBD PROPOSED PLANT SCHEDULE: TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering BK V R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_LAND_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:47:23 PMSB BH 2286-05 L101 SITE - PLANTING PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN 1" = 20'-0"L101 1 SITE - PLANTING PLAN QTY SYM COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME PLANTING SIZE PERENNIALS/VINES/ANNUALS 1 ac MAGGIE DALEY ASTILBE Astilbe chinensis 'Maggie Daley' #1 CONT. 1 ca FEATHER REED GRASS Calamagrostis arundinacea var. brachtytricha #1 CONT. 1 hb BLUE ANGEL HOSTA Hosta 'Blue Angel'#1 CONT. 1 hh HAPPY RETURNS DAYLILY Hemerocallis 'Happy Returns' #1 CONT. 1 pa HAMELN FOUNTAIN GRASS Pennisetum alopecuroides 'Hameln' #1 CONT. 1 pt PACHYSANDRA 'Green Carpet' Pachysandra terminalis 'Green Carpet' #1 CONT. 1 pv NORTHWIND SWITCHGRASS Panicum virgatum 'Northwind' #1 CONT. 1 rh WALKER'S LOW CATMINT Nepeta x faassenii 'Walker's Low' #1 CONT. 1 sh PRAIRIE DROPSEED Sporobolus heterolepis #1 CONT. 1 ss LITTLE BLUESTEM 'Blue Heaven' Schizachyrium scoparium 'Minnblue A' (PP17, 310) #1 CONT. ORNAMENTAL TREES 7 AG AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY Amelanchir x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance' 2" CAL. 2 BP WHITESPIRE BIRCH (CLUMP) Betula populifolia 'Whitespire' 2.5" CAL. 8 CC NORTHERN CLUMP REDBUD Cercis canadensis #20 CONT. 5 SR SUMMER STORM LILAC Syringa reticulata 'Summer Storm' (PPAF) 2" CAL. DECIDUOUS TREES 8 AS GREEN MOUNTAIN SUGAR MAPLE Acer saccharum 'Green Mountain' 2.5" CAL. 7 BN RIVER BIRCH Betula nigra 2.5" CAL. 6 BP DAKOTA PINNACLE BIRCH Betula platyphylla 'Fargo' 2.5" CAL. 3 GB AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO Ginkgo Biloba 'Autumn Gold' 2.5" CAL. 8 GT SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST Gleditsia triacanthos var. inermis 'Skycole' 2.5" CAL. 6 PT PRAIRIE GOLD ASPEN Populus tremuloides 'NEArb' 2.5" CAL. 8 QA QUAKING ASPEN Populous tremuloides #20 CONT. 7 QB SWAMP WHITE OAK Quercus bicolor 2.5" CAL. 5 QW KINDRED SPIRIT OAK Quercus x warei 'Nadler' 2.5" CAL. 5 TA AMERICAN SENTRY LINDEN Tilia americana 'MnKSentry' 2.5" CAL. DECIDUOUS SHRUBS 1 Bw NORTHERN CHARM BOXWOOD Buxus 'Wilson'#3 CONT. 1 Cc SUGARTINA CLETHRA Clethra alnifolia 'Crystalina' (PP21, 561) #2 CONT. 1 Cf ARCTIC FIRE DOGWOOD Cornus stolonifera 'Farrow' (PP18,523) #5 CONT. 1 Cs CARDINAL DOGWOOD Cornus sericea 'Cardinal' #5 CONT. 1 Ds BUTTERFLY BUSH HONEYSUCKLE Diervilla sessilifolia 'Butterfly' #5 CONT. 1 Dw DWARF WINGED EUONYMOU Euonymous alatus 'Compactus' #10 CONT. 1 Ra GRO LOW SUMAC Rhus aromatica 'Gro Low' #5 CONT. 1 Sm DWARF KOREAN LILAC Syringe meyeri 'Palibin' #5 CONT. 1 Sr RED ELDERBERRY Sambucus racemosa #5 CONT. 1 Ss SEM FALSE SPIREA Sorbaria sorbifolia 'Sem'(PP16,336) #2 CONT. CONIFEROUS TREES 1 JC SPARTAN JUNIPER Juniper chinensis 'Spartan' 6' B&B 12 PA NORWAY SPRUCE Picea abies 8' B&B 7 PS WHITE PINE Pinus Strobus 6' B&B CONIFEROUS SHRUBS 1 Cp KING'S GOLD CHAMAECYPARIS Chamaecyparis pisifera 'King's gold' #5 CONT. 1 Ct HEATHERBUN CHAMAECYPARIS Chamaecyparis thyoides 'Heather Bun' #5 CONT. 1 Jh BLUE CHIP JUNIPER Juniperus horizontalis 'Blue Chip' #5 CONT. 1 Jp SEA GREEN JUNIPER Juniperus x pfitseriana 'Sea Green' #5 CONT. 1 Js BLUE FOREST JUNIPER Juniperus sabina 'Blue Forest' #5 CONT. 1 Pb SCHOODIC PINE Pinus banksiana 'Schoodic' #3 CONT. 1 Tc TECHNITO ARBORVITAE Thuja occidentalis 'Bailjohn' (PP15, 850) 6' B&B *PLANT SCHEDULE FOR SPECIES REFERENCE ONLY, FINAL QUANTITIES TO BE DETERMINED IRRIGATION NOTE: ALL PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE DRIPLINE IRRIGATION, ALL TURF AREAS TO RECEIVE SPRAY NOZZLES (12"RCP)NO PARKING30' - 0"5' - 6"30' - 0" STAIR A ELEV A MECH - A STAIR B ELEC/DATA ELEV C ELEV B 3337 SF RESTUARANT ENTRY VESTIBULE 1197 SF LEASING CENTER 1370 SF LOBBY 210 SF PARCEL 217 SF MAIL 1434 SF CLUBROOM 348 SF GOLF 381 SF GAME 435 SF RESTROOMS / LOCKER ROOM 1103 SF FITNESS CENTER SCULPTURE DROP OFFCOURTYARD EDEN AVE WILLSON RDBUILDING ABOVE FUTURE OUTDOOR SPACE (MN DOT LAND) ALTERNATE OUTDOOR SEATING AREA 29 SURFACE PARKING SPACES -3 PARKING PACES -FUTURE DRIVEWAY EXISTING RETAINING WALL BELOW GRADE WATER RETENTION BELOW GRADE WATER RETENTION RAMP DN 12% ALTERNATE LOADING AREA DOG RUN AREA + 934.5 6 14 15 + 930 + 935 + 935.5 + 935.5 + 924 +/-GRADE AT WALL+ 923 +/-GRADE + 930 + 925 + 927 + 937 + 935 2 TRASH CORRIDOR OPEN MN DOT LAND + 933.5 + 933.5 2 ' - 0 "SERVICE DRIVEWAY + 925 +/-GRADE + 937RAMP 15' - 0"15' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"1 0 ' - 0 " 252' - 0"212' - 0"150' - 5"1 3 7 ' - 2 "125' - 7" TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture B K V R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S TR U C TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:37:09 PMAuthor Checker 2286-05 A010 SITE PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE SITE PLAN KEYNOTES A010 1/16" = 1'-0" 1 SITE ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN 3,700 SF STAIR A ELEV A ELEV C ELEV B STAIR B18' - 0"24' - 0"21' - 2"25' - 0"8"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0" 1 8' - 0 " 2 3' - 6 "18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"2 4 ' - 0 "RAMP 12% SLOPE UP LOWER LEVEL PARKING 2 6 ' - 0 "1 A501 1 A501 2 A501 2 A501 ELECTRICAL & MECHMECH C C TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S TR U C TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:28:13 PMAuthor Checker 2286-05 A098 LEVEL OVERALL LOWER BASEMENT PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE A098 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 P2 ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTESParking Schedule Family Level Count BKV_SITE-Parking Space P2 5 ADA: 5 BKV_SITE-Parking Space P2 142 STANDARD: 142 BKV_SITE-Parking Space P1 5 ADA: 5 BKV_SITE-Parking Space P1 125 STANDARD: 125 Grand total: 277 ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN TOTAL GROSS AREA - L1 TO L7 LEVEL AREA LEVEL 1 32646 SF LEVEL 2 31793 SF LEVEL 3 33884 SF LEVEL 4 32872 SF LEVEL 5 32872 SF LEVEL 6 32872 SF LEVEL 7 31443 SF TOTAL 228382 SF TOTAL GROSS AREA - PARKING LEVELS LEVEL AREA P2 53527 SF P1 53124 SF TOTAL 106652 SF BIT. TRAILSTAIR A ELEV A RAMP 12% SLOPE ELEV C ELEV B STAIR B18' - 6"24' - 0"21' - 2"25' - 0"8"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"DN 24' - 0" 1 8' - 0 " 2 3' - 6 "18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"2 4 ' - 0 "1 8 ' - 0 "TRASH ROOM BIKE ROOM POOL ROOM LOADING / STAGGINGMECH ROOM DOG WASH UPPER LEVEL PARKING VAN VAN 24' - 5" 1 A501 1 A501 2 A501 2 A501 DOG RUN 1' - 2 1/2"RAMP 12% SLOPE DN BUILDING ABOVE WATER ROOM & FIRE PUMP SERVICE DRIVEWAY TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S TR U C TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:28:16 PMAuthor Checker 2286-05 A099 LEVEL OVERALL UPPER BASEMENT PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES A099 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 P1 Parking Schedule Family Level Count BKV_SITE-Parking Space P2 5 ADA: 5 BKV_SITE-Parking Space P2 142 STANDARD: 142 BKV_SITE-Parking Space P1 5 ADA: 5 BKV_SITE-Parking Space P1 125 STANDARD: 125 Grand total: 277 ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN TOTAL GROSS AREA - L1 TO L7 LEVEL AREA LEVEL 1 32646 SF LEVEL 2 31793 SF LEVEL 3 33884 SF LEVEL 4 32872 SF LEVEL 5 32872 SF LEVEL 6 32872 SF LEVEL 7 31443 SF TOTAL 228382 SF TOTAL GROSS AREA - PARKING LEVELS LEVEL AREA P2 53527 SF P1 53124 SF TOTAL 106652 SF 1 A401 2 A402 1 A402 2 A401 2 A403 1 A403 65' - 6"1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED STAIR A ELEV A MECH - A STAIR B ELEC/DATA ELEV C ELEV B 3337 SF RESTUARANT ENTRY VESTIBULE 1197 SF LEASING CENTER 210 SF PARCEL 217 SF MAIL 1370 SF LOBBY 1434 SF CLUBROOM 1103 SF FITNESS CENTER 435 SF RESTROOMS / LOCKER ROOM 381 SF GAME 348 SF GOLF TRASH 1 A501 1 A501 2 A501 2 A501 1036 SF UNIT B3 - 2 BED 1060 SF UNIT B2 - 2 BED 1204 SF UNIT BD1 - 2 BED DEN 1201 SF UNIT BD2 - 2 BED DEN 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 706 SF UNIT A2 - 1 BED 680 SF UNIT A2.1 - 1 BED - - - - - - 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 724 SF UNIT A3 - 1 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED CORRIDOR 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 746 SF UNIT A1.1 - 1 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 30' - 0"5' - 6"30' - 0"65' - 6"80' - 0"65' - 6"30' - 0"5' - 6"30' - 0"1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED RAMP TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S TR U C TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:28:23 PMAuthor Checker 2286-05 A101 LEVEL 1 - OVERALL FLOOR PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES A101 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 LEVEL 1 UNIT MIX - RENTABLE AREA UNIT TYPE UNIT AREA COUNT # RENTABLE / TOTAL AREA UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF 67 46918 SF UNIT A1.1 - 1 BED 746 SF 1 746 SF UNIT A2 - 1 BED 706 SF 7 4941 SF UNIT A2.1 - 1 BED 680 SF 7 4759 SF UNIT A3 - 1 BED 724 SF 11 7966 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF 52 55640 SF UNIT B2 - 2 BED 1060 SF 12 12714 SF UNIT B3 - 2 BED 1036 SF 7 7253 SF UNIT B4 - 2 BED 1161 SF 5 5807 SF UNIT BD1 - 2 BED DEN 1204 SF 6 7221 SF UNIT BD2 - 2 BED DEN 1201 SF 6 7206 SF UNIT BD3 - 2 BED DEN 1203 SF 4 4810 SF UNIT BD4 - 2 BED DEN 1247 SF 4 4990 SF UNIT PH1 - PENTHOUSE 1496 SF 2 2992 SF UNIT PH2 - PENTHOUSE 1448 SF 1 1448 SF UNIT PH3 - PENTHOUSE 1486 SF 1 1486 SF UNIT PH4 - PENTHOUSE 1750 SF 1 1737 SF UNIT PH5 - PENTHOUSE 1694 SF 1 1694 SF UNIT PH6 - PENTHOUSE 1726 SF 1 1726 SF UNIT S1 - ALCOVE 572 SF 12 6863 SF TOTAL: 208 188918 SF ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN TOTAL GROSS AREA - L1 TO L7 LEVEL AREA LEVEL 1 32646 SF LEVEL 2 31793 SF LEVEL 3 33884 SF LEVEL 4 32872 SF LEVEL 5 32872 SF LEVEL 6 32872 SF LEVEL 7 31443 SF TOTAL 228382 SF TOTAL GROSS AREA - PARKING LEVELS LEVEL AREA P2 53527 SF P1 53124 SF TOTAL 106652 SF 3,700 SF 1 A401 2 A402 1 A402 2 A401 2 A403 1 A403 STAIR A ELEV A MECH - A STAIR B MECH - B ELEV C ELEV B TRASH OPEN TO DRIVE BELOW OPEN TO LOBBY BELOW 869 SF COCKTAIL BAR / TECH LOUNGE ELEC/DATA 1 A501 1 A501 2 A501 2 A501 1036 SF UNIT B3 - 2 BED 1060 SF UNIT B2 - 2 BED 1060 SF UNIT B2 - 2 BED 1204 SF UNIT BD1 - 2 BED DEN 1201 SF UNIT BD2 - 2 BED DEN 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 706 SF UNIT A2 - 1 BED - - - - - - 680 SF UNIT A2.1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 572 SF UNIT S1 - ALCOVE 572 SF UNIT S1 - ALCOVE 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 1161 SF UNIT B4 - 2 BED 724 SF UNIT A3 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 724 SF UNIT A3 - 1 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED CORRIDOR 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 107 SF CONFERENCE 63 SF CO-WORKING OFFICE 72 SF CO-WORKING OFFICE 74 SF CO-WORKING OFFICE 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED OUTDOOR DECK TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S TR U C TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:28:31 PMAuthor Checker 2286-05 A102 LEVEL 2 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES A102 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 LEVEL 2 ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN UNIT MIX - RENTABLE AREA UNIT TYPE UNIT AREA COUNT # RENTABLE / TOTAL AREA UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF 67 46918 SF UNIT A1.1 - 1 BED 746 SF 1 746 SF UNIT A2 - 1 BED 706 SF 7 4941 SF UNIT A2.1 - 1 BED 680 SF 7 4759 SF UNIT A3 - 1 BED 724 SF 11 7966 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF 52 55640 SF UNIT B2 - 2 BED 1060 SF 12 12714 SF UNIT B3 - 2 BED 1036 SF 7 7253 SF UNIT B4 - 2 BED 1161 SF 5 5807 SF UNIT BD1 - 2 BED DEN 1204 SF 6 7221 SF UNIT BD2 - 2 BED DEN 1201 SF 6 7206 SF UNIT BD3 - 2 BED DEN 1203 SF 4 4810 SF UNIT BD4 - 2 BED DEN 1247 SF 4 4990 SF UNIT PH1 - PENTHOUSE 1496 SF 2 2992 SF UNIT PH2 - PENTHOUSE 1448 SF 1 1448 SF UNIT PH3 - PENTHOUSE 1486 SF 1 1486 SF UNIT PH4 - PENTHOUSE 1750 SF 1 1737 SF UNIT PH5 - PENTHOUSE 1694 SF 1 1694 SF UNIT PH6 - PENTHOUSE 1726 SF 1 1726 SF UNIT S1 - ALCOVE 572 SF 12 6863 SF TOTAL: 208 188918 SF TOTAL GROSS AREA - L1 TO L7 LEVEL AREA LEVEL 1 32646 SF LEVEL 2 31793 SF LEVEL 3 33884 SF LEVEL 4 32872 SF LEVEL 5 32872 SF LEVEL 6 32872 SF LEVEL 7 31443 SF TOTAL 228382 SF TOTAL GROSS AREA - PARKING LEVELS LEVEL AREA P2 53527 SF P1 53124 SF TOTAL 106652 SF 1 A401 2 A402 1 A402 2 A401 2 A403 1 A403 572 SF UNIT S1 - ALCOVE 572 SF UNIT S1 - ALCOVE STAIR A ELEV A MECH - A STAIR B ELEV C ELEV B MECH - B TRASH ELEC/DATA 1 A501 1 A501 2 A501 2 A501 1036 SF UNIT B3 - 2 BED 1060 SF UNIT B2 - 2 BED 1060 SF UNIT B2 - 2 BED 724 SF UNIT A3 - 1 BED 1247 SF UNIT BD4 - 2 BED DEN 1203 SF UNIT BD3 - 2 BED DEN 1201 SF UNIT BD2 - 2 BED DEN 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 706 SF UNIT A2 - 1 BED 680 SF UNIT A2.1 - 1 BED - - - - - - 724 SF UNIT A3 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 1161 SF UNIT B4 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED CORRIDOR 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1204 SF UNIT BD1 - 2 BED DEN 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S TR U C TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:28:40 PMAuthor Checker 2286-05 A103 LEVEL 3-6 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES A103 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 LEVEL 3 ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN UNIT MIX - RENTABLE AREA UNIT TYPE UNIT AREA COUNT # RENTABLE / TOTAL AREA UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF 67 46918 SF UNIT A1.1 - 1 BED 746 SF 1 746 SF UNIT A2 - 1 BED 706 SF 7 4941 SF UNIT A2.1 - 1 BED 680 SF 7 4759 SF UNIT A3 - 1 BED 724 SF 11 7966 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF 52 55640 SF UNIT B2 - 2 BED 1060 SF 12 12714 SF UNIT B3 - 2 BED 1036 SF 7 7253 SF UNIT B4 - 2 BED 1161 SF 5 5807 SF UNIT BD1 - 2 BED DEN 1204 SF 6 7221 SF UNIT BD2 - 2 BED DEN 1201 SF 6 7206 SF UNIT BD3 - 2 BED DEN 1203 SF 4 4810 SF UNIT BD4 - 2 BED DEN 1247 SF 4 4990 SF UNIT PH1 - PENTHOUSE 1496 SF 2 2992 SF UNIT PH2 - PENTHOUSE 1448 SF 1 1448 SF UNIT PH3 - PENTHOUSE 1486 SF 1 1486 SF UNIT PH4 - PENTHOUSE 1750 SF 1 1737 SF UNIT PH5 - PENTHOUSE 1694 SF 1 1694 SF UNIT PH6 - PENTHOUSE 1726 SF 1 1726 SF UNIT S1 - ALCOVE 572 SF 12 6863 SF TOTAL: 208 188918 SF TOTAL GROSS AREA - L1 TO L7 LEVEL AREA LEVEL 1 32646 SF LEVEL 2 31793 SF LEVEL 3 33884 SF LEVEL 4 32872 SF LEVEL 5 32872 SF LEVEL 6 32872 SF LEVEL 7 31443 SF TOTAL 228382 SF TOTAL GROSS AREA - PARKING LEVELS LEVEL AREA P2 53527 SF P1 53124 SF TOTAL 106652 SF UP 1 A401 2 A402 1 A402 2 A401 2 A403 1 A403 1496 SF UNIT PH1 - PENTHOUSE STAIR A ELEV A MECH - A STAIR B ELEV C ELEV B MECH - B 599 SF ROOFTOP AMENITY 1448 SF UNIT PH2 - PENTHOUSE 1496 SF UNIT PH1 - PENTHOUSE 1726 SF UNIT PH6 - PENTHOUSE 1737 SF UNIT PH4 - PENTHOUSE 1694 SF UNIT PH5 - PENTHOUSE 1486 SF UNIT PH3 - PENTHOUSE TRASH ELEC/DATA 1 A501 1 A501 2 A501 2 A501 1036 SF UNIT B3 - 2 BED 1060 SF UNIT B2 - 2 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 698 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 698 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1067 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 706 SF UNIT A2 - 1 BED - - - - - - 680 SF UNIT A2.1 - 1 BED 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 572 SF UNIT S1 - ALCOVE 572 SF UNIT S1 - ALCOVE 700 SF UNIT A1 - 1 BED 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED CORRIDOR 1070 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1067 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED OUTDOOR DECK TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S TR U C TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:28:45 PMAuthor Checker 2286-05 A107 LEVEL 7 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES A107 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 LEVEL 7 ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN UNIT MIX - RENTABLE AREA UNIT TYPE UNIT AREA COUNT # RENTABLE / TOTAL AREA UNIT A1 - 1 BED 700 SF 67 46918 SF UNIT A1.1 - 1 BED 746 SF 1 746 SF UNIT A2 - 1 BED 706 SF 7 4941 SF UNIT A2.1 - 1 BED 680 SF 7 4759 SF UNIT A3 - 1 BED 724 SF 11 7966 SF UNIT B1 - 2 BED 1070 SF 52 55640 SF UNIT B2 - 2 BED 1060 SF 12 12714 SF UNIT B3 - 2 BED 1036 SF 7 7253 SF UNIT B4 - 2 BED 1161 SF 5 5807 SF UNIT BD1 - 2 BED DEN 1204 SF 6 7221 SF UNIT BD2 - 2 BED DEN 1201 SF 6 7206 SF UNIT BD3 - 2 BED DEN 1203 SF 4 4810 SF UNIT BD4 - 2 BED DEN 1247 SF 4 4990 SF UNIT PH1 - PENTHOUSE 1496 SF 2 2992 SF UNIT PH2 - PENTHOUSE 1448 SF 1 1448 SF UNIT PH3 - PENTHOUSE 1486 SF 1 1486 SF UNIT PH4 - PENTHOUSE 1750 SF 1 1737 SF UNIT PH5 - PENTHOUSE 1694 SF 1 1694 SF UNIT PH6 - PENTHOUSE 1726 SF 1 1726 SF UNIT S1 - ALCOVE 572 SF 12 6863 SF TOTAL: 208 188918 SF TOTAL GROSS AREA - L1 TO L7 LEVEL AREA LEVEL 1 32646 SF LEVEL 2 31793 SF LEVEL 3 33884 SF LEVEL 4 32872 SF LEVEL 5 32872 SF LEVEL 6 32872 SF LEVEL 7 31443 SF TOTAL 228382 SF TOTAL GROSS AREA - PARKING LEVELS LEVEL AREA P2 53527 SF P1 53124 SF TOTAL 106652 SF DN 1 A401 2 A402 1 A402 2 A401 2 A403 1 A403 STAIR B PHOTOVOLTAIC ZONE STAIR ROOF 1 A501 1 A501 2 A501 2 A501 ELEV OVERRUN GARDEN PLOTS MECH UNIT RESTAURANT VENTING MECH UNIT ROOF HATCH - - - - - - ROOF ANCHOR LOCATIONS ROOF ANCHOR LOCATIONS ROOF ANCHOR LOCATIONS ROOF ANCHOR LOCATIONS ROOF ANCHOR LOCATIONS ROOF ANCHOR LOCATIONSSLOPESLOPESLOPESLOPE TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S TR U C TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:28:50 PMAuthor Checker 2286-05 A140 ROOF PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE A140 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 ROOF ARCHITECTURAL KEYNOTES ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND FBR-1 WHITE BRICK STN-1 KASOTA STONE OR MANUFACTURED STONE FSDG-1 CEMENT BOARD SIDING AND TRIM DARK GREY DCMU-1 SPLIT FACE BLOCK - BUFF COLOR MP-1 METAL PANEL - COPPER FINISH UNACLAD FIRESTONE - CLASSIC COPPER MP-2 DECORATIVE METAL CEILING PANELS COPPER FINISH FSDG-2 CEMENT BOARD SIDING AND TRIM BUFF COLOR LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" P1 90' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 175' - 10" P2 80' - 0" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4"10' - 6"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"12' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"75' - 10"METAL RAILING -BLACKMETAL FRAME CANOPIES -DARK GREY FBR-1 FSDG-1FSDG-1 STN-1 MP-1 STN-1 DCMU-1 METAL CANOPY -COPPER METAL CANOPY -COPPER BLACK WINDOW FRAMES DECORATIVE EXTRUDED BRICK DECORATIVE CEMENT BOARD TRIM LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" P1 90' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 175' - 10" P2 80' - 0" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4"10' - 0"10' - 0"12' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 6"FBR-1 FSDG-1 FSDG-1 STN-1 MP-1 FSDG-1METAL FRAMED CANOPY -COPPER METAL CANOPIES -COPPER BLACK WINDOW FRAMESDECORATIVE EXTRUDED BRICKDECORATIVE CEMENT BOARD TRIM UNIT MECH. UNITS - MATCH ADJACENT COLOR FBR-1 G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S TR U C TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:29:06 PMAuthor Checker 2286-05 A401 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 4917 EDEN AVE EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES A401 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 EAST ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN A401 3/32" = 1'-0" 2 NORTH LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" P1 90' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 175' - 10" P2 80' - 0" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4"10' - 6"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"12' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"75' - 10"FBR-1 FSDG-1 MP-1 FSDG-1 STN-1FSDG-1 METAL CANOPY FRAMES -COPPER METAL CANOPIES -COPPER BLACK WINDOW FRAMES BLACK METAL RAILINGS EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND FBR-1 WHITE BRICK STN-1 KASOTA STONE OR MANUFACTURED STONE FSDG-1 CEMENT BOARD SIDING AND TRIM DARK GREY DCMU-1 SPLIT FACE BLOCK - BUFF COLOR MP-1 METAL PANEL - COPPER FINISH UNACLAD FIRESTONE - CLASSIC COPPER MP-2 DECORATIVE METAL CEILING PANELS COPPER FINISH FSDG-2 CEMENT BOARD SIDING AND TRIM BUFF COLOR LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" P1 90' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 175' - 10" P2 80' - 0"10' - 6"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"12' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4"75' - 10"DOG RUN AREA FSDG-1 FBR-1 FSDG-1 STN-1 DCMU-1FSDG-1DCMU-1 BLACK METAL RAILING DECORATIVE EXTRUDED BRICK DECORATIVE CEMENT BOARD TRIM MECH LOUVER -BUFFMECH. LOUVER -BUFF BLACK WINDOW FRAMES OVERHEAD LOADING DOOR G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S TR U C TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:29:22 PMAuthor Checker 2286-05 A402 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 4917 EDEN AVE EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES A402 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 WEST ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN A402 3/32" = 1'-0" 2 SOUTH LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" P1 90' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 175' - 10" P2 80' - 0" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4"10' - 6"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"12' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"75' - 10"FSDG-1 FBR-1 STN-1 FSDG-1UNIT MECH. LOUVERS - MATCH ADJACENT COLOR DECORATIVE EXTRUDED BRICK DECORATIVE CEMENT BOARD TRIM BLACK METAL RAILING BLACK WINDOW FRAMES FSDG-2 LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" P1 90' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 175' - 10" P2 80' - 0" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4"10' - 0"10' - 0"12' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 6"75' - 10"MP-1 FBR-1 FSDG-1FSDG-1 STN-1 METAL FRAMED CANOPY -COPPER DECORATIVE EXTRUDED BRICK DECORATIVE CEMENT BOARD TRIMBLACK WINDOW FRAMESUNIT MECH. LOUVERS -MATCH ADJACENT COLORBLACK METAL RAILINGSMETAL FRAMED CANOPY -COPPER FSDG-2 EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND FBR-1 WHITE BRICK STN-1 KASOTA STONE OR MANUFACTURED STONE FSDG-1 CEMENT BOARD SIDING AND TRIM DARK GREY DCMU-1 SPLIT FACE BLOCK - BUFF COLOR MP-1 METAL PANEL - COPPER FINISH UNACLAD FIRESTONE - CLASSIC COPPER MP-2 DECORATIVE METAL CEILING PANELS COPPER FINISH FSDG-2 CEMENT BOARD SIDING AND TRIM BUFF COLOR G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture BKV R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S TR U C TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:29:36 PMAuthor Checker 2286-05 A403 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 4917 EDEN AVE A403 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 COURTYARD -NORTH A403 3/32" = 1'-0" 2 COURTYARD -SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" P1 90' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 175' - 10" P2 80' - 0" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4"10' - 6"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"12' - 0"10' - 0"(+735'-00" CIVIL)75' - 10"RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL AMENITYCOURTYARD PARKING GARAGE LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 112' - 0" P1 90' - 0" LEVEL 3 122' - 8" LEVEL 4 133' - 4" ROOF 175' - 10" P2 80' - 0" LEVEL 5 144' - 0" LEVEL 6 154' - 8" LEVEL 7 165' - 4" (+735'-00" CIVIL)10' - 6"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"12' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"75' - 10"PARKING GARAGE RESIDENTAIL G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture B K V R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S TR U C TIO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_AI_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:35:50 PMAuthor Checker 2286-05 A501 BUILDING SECTIONS 4917 EDEN AVE A501 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 Section 1 ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN A501 3/32" = 1'-0" 2 Section 2 2 2 1 1 RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN New Concept - Rendering RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN New Concept - Rendering RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN New Concept - Rendering RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN New Concept - Rendering RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN New Concept - Rendering RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN New Concept - Material RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN FBR-1 white brick STN-1 kasota stone or manufactured stone FSDG-1 cement board siding and trim dark grey MP-1 & 2 metal panel copper finish DCMU-1 split face block buff color FSDG-2 cement board siding and trim buff NEW CONCEPT - Materialss 1 216955v3 (reserved for recording information) SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT CITY OF EDINA 4917 EDEN AVENUE THIS SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) dated November 3, 2021, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”) and EDEN AVENUE GROUP, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Developer”). 1. BACKGROUND. A. Developer has applied to redevelop Tracts A and C, Registered Land Survey No. 1501, Hennepin County Minnesota (torrens COT 125457), in the City of Edina, State of Minnesota (“Subject Property”), into a seven (7) story, 196-unit apartment building with a 3,700 square foot restaurant. Ten (10%) percent of the apartment units will qualify for affordable housing (the “Project”). B. The City has rezoned the Subject Property to Planned Unit Development (“PUD”). The Project is in accordance with the PUD. A Site Improvement Performance Agreement is required for the PUD. 2 216955v3 2. RIGHT TO PROCEED. On the Subject Property, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: (1) this Agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with both the City Clerk and the Hennepin County Registrar’s Office, (2) the required security has been received by the City, and (3) the required insurance certificate has been received by the City. 3. PLANS. The Subject Property shall be developed in accordance with the following Plans which are on file with the City. The Plans shall not be attached to this Agreement. If the Plans vary from the written terms of this Agreement, the written terms shall control. The Plans are:  Existing Conditions and Removal Plans dated 10/5/21 prepared by Loucks  Erosion Control Plan dated 10/15/21 prepared by Loucks  Final Development Plan dated 3/12/21 prepared by Loucks & BKV Group  Utility Plans dated 10/5/21 prepared by Loucks  Details Plan dated 10/5/21 prepared by Loucks  Design and Building Plan dated 10/5/21 prepared by BKV Group  Final Landscaping Plan dated 10/5/21 prepared by BKV Group  Parking Plan dated 10/5/21 prepared by Loucks  Sidewalk and Pedestrian Plan dated 10/5/21 prepared by Loucks & BKV Group  Transportation System Plan dated 4/19/21 prepared by Wenck resolving issues east of Highway 100 in the Grandview District  Bike Racks and Bike Parking Stalls Plan following the City Code and the recommendations of the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (APBP) dated 10/5/21 prepared by BKV Group The Developer may request changes to the Plans. For Plan changes deemed minor, pursuant to City ordinances, changes can be reviewed and approved by City staff. All other Plan changes shall require approval by the City Council. 4. EROSION CONTROL. Prior to initiating construction, the Erosion Control Plan shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control obligations if they would be reasonable and beneficial. All areas disturbed by the grading operations shall be stabilized per the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 3 216955v3 (“MPCA”) Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity. Seed shall be in accordance with the City's current seeding specification, which may include temporary seed to provide ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the MPCA Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity or with the Erosion Control Plan or any schedule of supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within thirty (30) days of receipt of notice thereof, the City may draw on the letter of credit to pay any costs. No development or utility construction will be allowed on the Subject Property and no building permits will be issued for the Subject Property unless the Subject Property is in full compliance with the approved Erosion Control Plan. 5. LICENSE. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Subject Property to perform (a) all work permitted to be performed by the City under this Agreement, and (b) all inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site development. 6. CONSTRUCTION ACCESS. Construction traffic access and egress must be in accordance with the Construction Management Plan, which will be provided by the Developer and approved by the City prior to the commencement of construction. A driveway entrance permit will be required for entrance reconstruction. The driveway on Wilson Road shall be at least 50- feet from the intersection with Eden Avenue pursuant to City Code. 4 216955v3 7. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY/HOURS. Grading, construction activity, and the use of power equipment are prohibited between the hours of 9 o’clock p.m. and 7 o’clock a.m. The City may, at the City’s discretion and at the Developer’s expense, have one or more City inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a part-time basis. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all instructions received from the City’s inspectors. The Developer’s engineer shall provide for on-site project management. The Developer’s engineer is responsible for design changes and contract administration between the Developer and the Developer’s contractor. The Developer or its engineer shall schedule a pre-construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. 8. DEWATERING. Due to the variable nature of groundwater levels and stormwater flows, it is the Developer’s responsibility to satisfy itself with regard to the elevation of groundwater and to perform any necessary dewatering and storm flow routing. All dewatering shall be in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. 9. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install the Public Improvements within eighteen (18) months after issuance of the necessary permits for the Public Improvements. 10. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Agreement and final acceptance by the City Engineer, the Public Improvements shall become City property without further notice or action. Prior to acceptance of the Public Improvements by the City, the Developer must furnish the following affidavits:  Contractor’s Certificate  Engineer’s Certificate  Developer’s Certificate 5 216955v3 certifying that all construction has been completed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Upon receipt of affidavits and verification by the City Engineer, the City Engineer will accept the completed Public Improvements. Within thirty (30) days after the acceptance of the Public Improvements and before the security is released, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible record drawings. The City’s standard specifications for utility construction identify the procedures for final acceptance of utilities. 11. CLEAN UP. Within 24 hours the Developer shall clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, subcontractors, their agents or assigns. Prior to any construction in the Subject Property, the Developer shall identify in writing a responsible party for erosion control, street cleaning, and street sweeping. 12. CITY ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION. The Developer shall pay for in-house engineering administration. City in- house engineering administration will include monitoring of construction observation, consultation with Developer and its engineer on status or problems regarding the Project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, Project monitoring during the warranty period, final inspection and acceptance, and processing of requests for reduction in security. 13. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement, payment of the costs of all Public and Private Improvements, and construction of all Public and Private Improvements in accordance with the Plans, the Developer shall either deposit cash with the City or furnish the City with a letter of credit in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A (or some combination of cash and a letter of credit), from a bank in the total amount of $110,000 total = $60,000 sidewalk + $50,000 sanitary sewer extension ("Security"). The bank issuing the letter of credit shall be subject to the approval of the City Manager. The City may draw down the 6 216955v3 security, on five (5) business days written notice to the Developer, for any violation of the terms of this Agreement or without notice if the security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City that the Project has been substantially completed in accordance with the Plans and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with City approval the security may be reduced from time to time by ninety percent (90%) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10%) of the security shall be retained as security until all Public Improvements have been completed, all financial obligations to the City satisfied, the required "as constructed" plans have been received by the City, a warranty is provided, and the Public Improvements are accepted by the City Council. The City’s standard specifications for utility and street construction outline procedures for security reductions. 14. WARRANTY. The Developer warrants all Public and Private Improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this Agreement against poor material and faulty workmanship. The warranty period for all Public Improvements is one year and shall commence following completion and acceptance by City Engineer. The Developer shall post or cause its contractor to post maintenance bonds in the amount of twenty-five percent (25%) of final certified construction costs of the Public Improvements to secure the warranties. The City shall retain ten percent (10%) of the security posted by the Developer until the maintenance bonds are furnished to the City or until the warranty period expires, whichever first occurs. The retainage may be used to pay for warranty work. 7 216955v3 15. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. A. The Developer shall comply with the conditions outlined in City Council Resolution No. 2021-41. B. The Developer shall comply with the conditions outlined in the Director of Engineering’s memo dated April 21, 2021 and the Transportation Engineer’s memo dated April 21, 2021. C. The Developer shall comply with the conditions outlined and in the Fire Marshal and Building Official’s memo dated April 22, 2021. D. The Developer must conform to the City’s affordable housing policy. The Project shall provide ten (10%) percent of the units (20 units) within the building for affordable housing for families earning fifty (50%) percent area median income (AMI) for the Twin Cities. E. Developer shall obtain and submit to the City for approval the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit that meets the District’s requirements. F. Developer shall construct pedestrian crossing improvements to the intersection of Wilson Road and Eden Avenue subject to the review and approval by the City. Developer shall install a sidewalk from the restaurant entrance and west side parking area to Eden Avenue for pedestrian access and safety. Maintenance of the sidewalks shall be the responsibility of the property owner. Except, maintenance of the sidewalks on Eden Avenue and Wilson Road will be the responsibility of the City. 16. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. The Developer shall pay all reasonable costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the installation of the Public Improvements, including but not limited to the development of the site, legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in 8 216955v3 connection with approval and development of the Subject Property, the preparation of this Agreement, review of any other plans and documents. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from Developer’s development of the site and installation of Public Improvements, except for costs incurred as a result of the City’s negligence or intentional misconduct. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including reasonable attorneys' fees, except for costs, damagers or expenses incurred as a result of the City’s negligence or intentional misconduct, occurring during Developer’s ownership of the Subject Property. C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for undisputed obligations incurred under this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the undisputed bills are not paid on time, the City may halt site development and construction until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per year. 17. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City or the Developer under this Agreement. B. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including property conveyed to third parties. C. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Agreement. 9 216955v3 D. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. E. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer has fee title to the Subject Property or has obtained consents to this Agreement, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. F. The Developer and its contractors shall acquire public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of the Developer's work or the work of their subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for such insurance shall be in a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy on a primary and noncontributory basis, and the Developer and contractors shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage. The Developer and contractors must provide a Certificate of Insurance which meets the following requirements: 1. The Description section of the Accord form needs to read “City of Edina is named as Additional Insured with respect to the General Liability and Auto Liability policies on a Primary and Non-Contributory Basis.” 2. Certificate Holder must be City of Edina. 3. Provide a copy of the policy endorsement showing City of Edina named as Additional Insured on a Primary and Non-Contributory Basis. These insurance coverages and the requirements hereunder shall be required until the Certificate of Completion is issued. 10 216955v3 G. The Developer and its general contractor shall obtain Workmen’s Compensation Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota, including Employer’s Liability Insurance, to the limit of $100,000 each accident. These insurance coverages and the requirements hereunder shall be required until the Certificate of Completion is issued. H. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. I. The Developer represents to the City that the Public Improvements comply with all city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the Public Improvements do not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work on the Subject Property until the Developer does comply. Upon the City’s demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. J. The Developer may not assign this Agreement without the written permission of the City Council prior to issuance of the Certificate of Completion. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire Subject Property, or any part of it. K. An uncured breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer and the failure to cure such breach within the period provided in this Agreement, including nonpayment of billings 11 216955v3 from the City, shall be grounds for denial of building permits and certificates of occupancy, and the halting of all work on the property. L. From time to time, when requested by Developer, the City shall execute and deliver a recordable certificate confirming the satisfaction or completion of certain requirements contained in this Agreement. 18. DEVELOPER’S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer, beyond the applicable notice and cure periods provided in this Agreement, as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any actual, out-of-pocket expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given written notice of the work in default and the opportunity to cure, not less than thirty (30) days in advance. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 19. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: Eden Avenue Group, LLC C/O Reuter Walton Development, LLC Attn: Nicholas Walton 4450 Excelsior Boulevard, Suite 400 St. Louis Park, MN 55416-5541 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: 12 216955v3 City of Edina Attn: City Manager Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424-1330 20. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION. After the Developer has received the final certificate of occupancy for the Improvements and completed the work required under this Agreement, the City Manager will issue a certificate of completion after written request from the Developer, unless denied as set forth below. The certificate of completion shall be consistent in form with the certificate of completion issued by the City and shall be in recordable form and may be recorded against the Subject Property. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signature pages follow.] 13 216955v3 CITY OF EDINA By: ____________________________________ James Hovland, Mayor And ___________________________________ Scott Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of _______________, 2021, by James Hovland and Scott Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager, of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ___________________________________ Notary Public 14 216955v3 DEVELOPER: EDEN AVENUE GROUP, LLC By: ____________________________________ ___________________________ [print name] Its _________________________ [title] STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of _______________, 2021, by __________________________, the ____________________ of Eden Avenue Group, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. ___________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: 651-452-5000 DSK 216955v3 EXHIBIT A IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. ___________________ Date: _________________ TO: City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424-1330 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $____________, available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. __________, dated ________________, 2_____, of (Name of Bank) "; b) Be signed by the City Manager or Finance Director of the City of Edina. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) , on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2_____. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty- five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Edina Finance Director that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Edina City Manager, Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424-1330, and is actually received by the City Manager at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. BY: ____________________________________ Its ______________________________ 216955v3 FEE OWNER CONSENT TO SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT EDEN VENTURES, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, fee owner of the Subject Property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Improvement Performance Agreement, affirms and consents to the provisions thereof and agrees to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply the Subject Property. Dated this _____ day of _________________, 2021. EDEN VENTURES, LLC By: _____________________________________ Ned Abdul-Hajj, Its Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of _____________, 2021, by Ned Abdul-Hajj, the Manager of Eden Ventures, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the entity. ________________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 DSK 216955v3 MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT ___________________________________, a ____________________, which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Improvement Performance Agreement, which mortgage is dated _____________ and recorded _______________ with the Hennepin County Recorder/Registrar as document number ____________, agrees that the Site Improvement Performance Agreement shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2021. ________________________________________ By: ______________________________________ ____________________________[print name] Its ____________________________ [title] STATE OF ______________ ) )ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of __________, 2021, by ______________________________, the ______________________________ of ________________________________________, a __________________________, on behalf of the entity. ________________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 DSK Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Ross Bintner, PE, Engineering Services Manager Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Clean Water Strategy Professional Services Scope, Phase 1 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for Clean Water Strategy Professional Services Scope, Phase 1 for $81,000 with Barr Engineering. INTRODUCTION: Development of a Clean Water Strategy is described in the 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan. The phase 1 scope includes evaluating current priorities, program accomplishments, levels of service, and performing a gap analysis. It also includes developing lake-specific infographics and clean water fact sheets to communicate lake characteristics, activity, and applicability of strategies to various waterbodies. T he outcome of phase 1 will form the basis of the scope for phase 2 which will outline the philosophy and vision of the Clean Water Strategy and lay out options to close the gaps or improve service levels including resident engagement. The development of the strategy will focus on Lake Cornelia with lessons learned that can be applied citywide. This project is funded from the storm water utility. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Clean Water Strategy Professional Services Scope Phase 1 Agreement Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12100224 Department:Engineering Buyer:Jessica Vanderwerff Wilso Date: 10/27/2021 Requisition Description:Clean Water Strategy Prof Services Scope, Phase 1 Vendor:BARR ENGINEERING CO Cost:$81,000.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:NEW - NEW PURCHASE SOURCE:SERVIC K - SERVICE CONTRACT DESCRIPTION: Clean Water Strategy Professional Services Scope, Phase 1 This project includes development of the Clean Water Strategy as well as subsequent implementation of clean water activities for Lake Cornelia. BUDGET IMPACT: CIP 19-ST2; CIP 19-342 This project is funded from the storm water utility. 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT: This phase will identify the goals and expectations of the City’s current program versus what it’s currently accomplishing. In some cases, gaps may indicate areas where the City should focus on adjusting its approach (to be defined in Phase 2 of this effort). ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: The strategy development is an investigation and planning effort which will result in a report. Implementation items will be defined through the strategy development and environmental considerations will be determined as further defined improvements are scheduled. Barr Engineering Co. 4300 MarketPointe Drive, Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55435 952.832.2600 www.barr.com October 25, 2021 Ross Bintner and Jessica Wilson Engineering Department City of Edina 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Re: Proposal for Clean Water Strategy – Phase 1 - Current State of Edina’s Program Dear Mr. Bintner and Ms. Wilson: This letter presents our proposed scope of services and associated cost estimate for providing services related to Phase 1 of development of a Clean Water Strategy for the City of Edina. Project Understanding We understand City staff seeks to follow a phased approach in defining its Clean Water Strategy. Phase 1 is described in this scope of work and involves defining the City’s current “State of Clean Water” including creating some public communication materials in the form of lake infographics (lake-specific, graphically presented information that describes the character and history of each lake and significant waterbodies throughout the City) and clean water topic area fact sheets (informational narratives and graphics covering topics such as harmful algal blooms, aeration, and shallow lake and aquatic vegetation management). This phase will identify the goals and expectations of the City’s current program versus what it’s currently accomplishing. In some cases, gaps may indicate areas where the City should focus on adjusting its approach (to be defined in Phase 2 of this effort). Tasks for this Phase 1 effort are organized around answering the following questions: • What are the City’s current priorities concerning clean (surface) water? • What is the City’s current program accomplishing, and what level of service is the City achieving? • What are others doing to deliver clean surface water? • What research efforts could be pursued in partnership with others, such as the University of Minnesota? After answering these questions, Barr proposes to create a series of lake infographics, clean water topic area fact sheets and related web content that can be used for communication to the public, as well as to perform a gaps analysis that will inform Phase 2 of this effort. Phase 1 deliverables will help inform the scope of work for Phase 2 which is currently intended to outline the philosophy and vision of the City’s Clean Water Strategy and lay out options to close the gaps or improve level of service. One component of the Phase 2 effort will include a resident survey to identify the clean water values of the public. Mr. Ross Bintner and Ms. Wilson Page 2 W:\Business Units\WR\Proposals\2021\P206.21 City of Edina Clean Water Strategy\Final Files\City of Edina - Clean Water Strategy - Phase 1_10272021.docx Project Scope of Work Our proposed scope of work includes the following tasks. Task 1: What are the City’s current priorities concerning clean (surface) water? Barr staff will review past plans and publications (Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan, etc.) that define the City’s current priorities surrounding clean water and interview City staff about current priorities and level of service (and whether they are reflective of the goals laid forth in the documents mentioned above). Task 2: What is the City’s current program accomplishing, and what level of service is the City achieving? Barr staff will review the current water quality of waterbodies throughout Edina, leveraging monitoring data from Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, where the data is available. Barr will also ask the City to identify key City staff who can share perspectives on what is (and what is not) “working” to accomplish current goals related to clean water. Barr anticipates conducting brief interviews with these staff to gage the City’s accomplishments and to shed light on potential future goals and activities. Topics will include discussions about where the City is particularly poised for success (vs not) and how the City typically partners with watershed districts and other organizations to meet its clean water goals. For cost estimating purposes, we have assumed Barr staff will conduct two interviews with City staff. Lastly, this task will involve a review of the City’s SWPPP/MS4 permit language to gage how the City is currently meeting their permit requirements and where additional work may be needed. Task 3: What are others doing to deliver clean surface water? And, what research efforts could be pursued in partnership with others (e.g., University of Minnesota)? Barr staff will review the activities of up to four other cities (potential examples include Chicago, Philadelphia, Everett (Washington) and one other) to gather other examples of clean water philosophies. Barr staff will also interview University of Minnesota/St. Anthony Falls Lab staff to gain insight on research needs and potential partnership opportunities with the university. Task 4: Lake Infographics and Clean Water Topic Area Fact sheets: Barr staff will create a series of summary and fact sheets that the City can use in communications with the public about high-profile Edina waterbodies and clean water activities such as shallow lake management. This effort will include the creation of lake infographics that describe the history of each lake, including changes in the waterbody and surrounding land use since settlement (leveraging historic aerial photos and historic maps), water quality and ecology. The infographic for Lake Cornelia will be created first and be used as a template for the other lakes and waterbodies. For the purposes of our cost estimate, we have assumed lake/waterbody infographics (pdf format) will be developed for 14 waterbodies: Mr. Ross Bintner and Ms. Wilson Page 3 W:\Business Units\WR\Proposals\2021\P206.21 City of Edina Clean Water Strategy\Final Files\City of Edina - Clean Water Strategy - Phase 1_10272021.docx • Lake Cornelia • Arrowhead Lake • Melody Lake • Hawkes Lake • Mirror Lake • Lake Harvey • Highlands Lake • Lake Pamela • Lake Edina • Southwest Ponds • Indianhead Lake • Centennial Lakes (stormwater pond) • Lakes Garrison/Nancy area (grouped) • One additional, as needed Wherever possible, information already compiled by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and the Minnesota DNR will be leveraged for the purposes of each infographic. We understand that City staff are frequently asked about the following lake management strategies: dye and copper sulfate treatments, aquatic vegetation management, aeration, dredging, and management of harmful algal blooms (HAB). Based on this feedback from City staff, Barr will create up to six fact sheets (pdf format) including the five listed above plus an additional one (identified with input from City staff) about lake management activities that can help communicate typical City activities and to set appropriate expectations for what the City can and cannot do. In addition to the lake infographics and clean water topic area fact sheets, we will also provide related graphical web content (jpeg, png, or City-requested format) that the City can use for various communication purposes. Task 5: Gaps analysis: Where could the City do more, and where could it do less? After compiling the information listed above, Barr staff will perform a gaps analysis that looks at the differences between: • Current City philosophy, level of service and actual outcomes • Current City requirements and expectations • Current City clean water activities and the clean water activities of other cities and organizations (comparing different “portfolios of work”) Lake Cornelia and its associated drainage area will be used as a focal geography for performing a gaps analysis. Lessons learned from the Lake Cornelia gaps analysis will then by extrapolated for application to the rest of the city. This gaps analysis will form the basis for the scope of Phase 2: Clean Water Strategy, which will be defined at a future date. Mr. Ross Bintner and Ms. Wilson Page 4 W:\Business Units\WR\Proposals\2021\P206.21 City of Edina Clean Water Strategy\Final Files\City of Edina - Clean Water Strategy - Phase 1_10272021.docx Findings of Tasks 1, 2, 3, and 5 will be included in a summary memo. Task 4 deliverables will also be included as an appendix to the summary memo. For the purpose of this cost estimate, we have assumed that City staff will provide one round of review comments that Barr staff will address before finalizing the Phase 1 summary memo. Project Cost Estimate and Schedule The total cost for the scope of work described above is $81,000. We propose to complete this work on a time and expense basis. Barr will complete the proposed scope of work in accordance with the Master Agreement for Professional Engineering Services. The following table summarizes the estimated cost and schedule. Our schedule assumes we will receive authorization to proceed by November 5, 2021. Table 1. Estimated Task Level Budget and Estimated Completion Date Task Deliverable Estimated Budget Estimated Completion Date Task 1. Evaluating the City’s current priorities concerning clean (surface) water Summary Memo (including Task 5) $8,400 December 2021 Task 2. Evaluating the City’s current program accomplishments, and level of service $11,500 January 2022 Task 3. Evaluation of what others are doing to deliver clean water and what research efforts could be pursued in partnership with others $10,800 January 2022 Task 4. Lake Infographics and Clean Water Topic Area Fact sheets Pdf-format infographics/fact sheets and associated web content (will be included as attachments to the Summary Memo) $33,500 February 2022 Task 5. Gaps Analysis Summary Memo (included with Tasks 1-3) $16,800 Early March 2022 TOTAL $81,000 Mr. Ross Bintner and Ms. Wilson Page 5 W:\Business Units\WR\Proposals\2021\P206.21 City of Edina Clean Water Strategy\Final Files\City of Edina - Clean Water Strategy - Phase 1_10272021.docx We appreciate the opportunity to continue providing engineering services to the City of Edina and look forward to working with you on this project. If the proposed scope of services is satisfactory, please sign a copy of this letter in the space provided and return it to us. If you have any questions about the scope of services, please contact Stephanie Johnson, Project Manager (stephanie.johnson@barr.com, 952-842-3766,) or Sarah Stratton, Principal in Charge (sstratton@barr.com, 952-832-2860). Sincerely yours, BARR ENGINEERING CO. Sarah Stratton Its Vice President Accepted this ____________ day of ___________________, 20____ City of Edina By Its Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Tom Swenson, Assistant Director of Parks and Natural Resources Item Activity: Subject:Approve Revised Tree Removal Special Assessment for 7 Woodland Road Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve revised tree removal special assessment of $3,685 for 7 Woodland Road to be special assessed in 2022. INTRODUCTION: A public hearing for tree assessments was opened on October 5, 2021 and was closed at noon on October 11, 2021. The City Council approved 11 tree assessments at the October 19, 2021 meeting. During that process the special assessment for 7 Woodland Road was removed from the resolution action for further discussion. The City Manager communicated to the property owner that the assessment amount would be reduced from $12,030 to $3,685. Timing of approved special assessments needs to occur annually at least 30 days prior to November 30 to be certified with Hennepin County. Due to the continued communications this window has passed for 2021 and this assessment charge will be set for certification in November 2022. It will be listed as a pending assessment until then in the event the property ownership changes. ATTACHMENTS: Description Diseased and Hazard Tree Notification Process City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Parks and Recreation Department Phone 952-927-8861 • Fax 952-826-0390 • EdinaMN.gov Date: Oct. 26, 2021 To: Scott Neal, City Manager cc: Tom Swenson, Assistant Director of Parks and Natural Resources and Luther Overholt, City Forester From: Perry Vetter, Parks and Recreation Director Subject: Diseased and Hazard Tree Notification Process In accordance with City Code Chapter 30 – IV for Shade Tree Diseases all property owners are given an opportunity to remove a diseased or hazard tree within a three-week (21 day) period of time. If the tree(s) are not removed, the city contracts for removal and assesses the property owner. In conversations related to the 2021tree assessment process it was agreed that staff would revise the notification process used to inform property owners. The current and revised process is side by side below. Current Revised 1 Observation of diseased/hazard tree 1 Observation of diseased/hazard tree 2 In-person contact/door knock 2 In-person contact/door knock 3 Inspection of tree 3 Inspection of tree 4 Paint tree 4 Paint tree 5 Wrap tree, leave door hanger 5 Issue removal letter 6 Issue removal letter 6 Wait for contact or removal 7 Wait for contact or removal 7 Minimum 21-day waiting period 8 Minimum 21-day waiting period 8 Reinspect tree 9 Reinspect tree 10 Attempt in-person contact, knock on door 11 Wrap tree, leave door hanger 12 Issue letter tree will be removed, and it will be assessed 13 Minimum 14-day waiting period 9 Removal by the city 14 Removal by the city 10 Issue letter noticing the public hearing for the assessment 15 Issue letter noticing the public hearing for the assessment In addition to the revised notification process, staff will also (1) update the notification letter to apply plain language practices; (2) update the city’s website with additional and clarifying information; (3) if available purchase orange “caution” tape preprinted indicating a tree has been inspected and list the City Forester’s phone number, and; (4) continue to issue letters to the property owner. If the occupant is not the owner, the letter will be issued to both the occupant address and owner address. It is anticipated that the continuum of this notification process would only occur if there was no reciprocal contact from the property owner in regard to the tree notification. Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Approve Public Utilty Improvement Agreements Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Public Utility Improvement Agreements associated with the 2021 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Projects. INTRODUCTION: Each year, property owners are encouraged to upgrade their sewer and water service lines at the same time the City is upgrading their street and City utilities. This year, five property owners upgraded their service lines and added the costs to their special assessments. These assessments will be levied on their properties next year with the street reconstruction special assessments. ATTACHMENTS: Description Public Utility Improvement Agreements PUBLIC UTILITY IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this r -4 day of ‘1/45„.ss„-- , 2021, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and Jeff Austin and Robin Austin, (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the ownerof Lot 001. Block 001. Melody Knolls Second Addition having a street address of 5713 Melody Lane, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property"). B. Property Owner will install approximately 81.5 feet of 4" and 6" CIPP HammerHead liner from house to city main and install 1" poly waterline from curb stop to house within their sewer and water service ("Public Utility Improvement") and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Ouverson Sewer and Water, PO Box 247. Loretto, MN 55357 (the "Contractor") to constructthe Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 2534 was issued to the Contractor. When the work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 2534 for the amount of $11.420.00 and the City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed, the City will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Public Utility Improvement cost in the amount of $11,420.00 against the Subject Property. The cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 21-2. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessment of the Public Utility Improvement including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against th e title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard . Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392 PitOPERTY OWN Rob n Austin STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HEON6fiR) ) TO el The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this / day of by Jeff Austin and Robin Austin. , 2021, DENISE G. DENISON NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA My Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2025 NOTARY PUBLIC CITY OF EDINA: BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor AND Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20__, by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate CenterCunie Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612)452-5000 RNK:sm PUBLIC UTIUTYIMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this 1 day of 'JI>. ~~a-, 2021, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (''City") and Elizabeth Robinson and Grant Robinson, (the "Property Owner'). RECITALS A. PropertyOwneristheownerofLot002,Block002.Melody KnollsSecondAdditionhavingastreet address of 5728 Melody Lane, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property'). 8. Property Owner will install 1" waterline f ram curb stop to meter within their water service ( "Public Utility Improvement") and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, INCONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANT'S THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Minneapolis & Suburban~ & Water. 3233 45" Avenue North. Minneapolis. MN 55406. (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. PropertyOwnerenteredintoacontractwiththeContractortoconstructthePubliclmprovernentandPurchaseOrder No. 2532 was issued to the Contracior. When the work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 2532 for the amount of $5,000.00 and the City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed, the City will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Public Utility Improvement cost in the amount of $5,000.00 against the Subject Property. The cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. eJG 21-2. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessment of the Public Utility Improvement including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuantto Minn. Stat.§ 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's suc:x;essors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded againstthe title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) \ _ I SS. COUNTY OF \"tt..~tc,f\t'--\j PROPERTY OWNER: -----..;;..Qlrstt J,.,M ~ lD' (/ - ElizaA th ~~J /_}-12j~ Grant Robinson STACEY L TURNQUIST NOTARY PUBLIC MINNESOTA · My Commission Expires 01131/2024 The foregoing instrumentwas acknowledged before me this 9.l-.... day of , )'-Jt-J'(,,, by Elizabeth and Grant Robinson. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ' { ss. ) ~(~ NOTARYPUIC CITY OF EDINA: BY: James 8. Hovland, Mayor AND __________ _ Scott H. Neal, City Manager I 2021, The foregoing instrumentwas acknowledged before me this ___ day of _______ .20__,_ by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. DRAFTED BY: .;;AMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452-5000 RNK:sm NOT ARY PUBLIC PUBLIC UTILITY IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT m-this \ ~ day of 0-~ , 2021, by a~ between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation C'City") and Matt and E beth Zung, (the "Property Owner'l RECITALS A Property Owner is the owner of Lot 001. Block 002. Edina Ridge having a street address of HD Eastview Drive. Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property"). B. Property Owner will spot repair in yard and install up to 8 feet of pipe in their sewer service ("Public Utility lmprovemenf'l and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Discount Plumbers. 547 County Road E, Shoreview. MN 55126. (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 2529 was issued to the Contractor. When the work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 2529 for the amount of $6,000.00 and the City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed, the City will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Public Utility Improvement cost in the amount of S6.000.00 against the Subject Property. The cost will be assessed under the same tenns as City Project No. ENG 21-2. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessment of the Public Utility lmproven,ent including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. Tile Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard• Edina, Minnesota 55439 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNlY OF \-\~f'"" } ( ss. } The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this \ ~ day of ~ a.':1 by Matt and Elii!abelh Zung. NOTARY~ l_~-.:. .EW> ALLEN BUCKINGHAM !l!~l tmARY Ml.£· MfflESOTA -,:..: <~ · 111 COlUISSKlN EXPIRES 01'31/2022 ·"-""'·· CITY OF EDINA: BY: James B. Hovland, Mayor AND _________ _ Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA } ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN } • 2021, The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of _____ ~ 20_, by James 8. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal. respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Associath,i 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporale Cenler Curve Eagan, M'llnesota 55121 Telepho11e: (612) 452-5000 RNK:sm NOTARY PUBLIC Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.G. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Aaron T. Ditzler, PE, Assistant City Engineer Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-100: Setting Public Improvement Hearings Date for Blake Road A, B, & C and Morningside D & E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2021-100, setting Public Improvement Hearings for Dec. 13, 2021, for Blake Road A, B, & C and Morningside D & E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction. INTRODUCTION: Project area maps are attached showing the streets that are included for reconstruction in 2022. Staff will present the details of a preliminary engineering study associated with both project areas. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-100: Setting Public Improvement Hearings Date Morningside D & E Project Area Map Blake Road A, B, & C Project Area Map RESOLUTION NO. 2021-100 SET PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT HEARINGS FOR DECEMBER 13, 2021 FOR BLAKE ROAD A, B, & C AND MORNINGSIDE D & E NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, that a public hearing shall be held on the 13th day of December, 2021, at 6:00 p.m., to consider roadway reconstruction for Blake Road A, B, & C and Morningside D & E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such Improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. Dated: November 3, 2021 Attest:______________________________ _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 3, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of _____________, 20___. ____________________________________ City Clerk 441840124112 4201 4211 4208 4236 41404100 420 04356 421543084232 4166 4405 43044306 4248 44094239 4412 4410 4 1 9 4 4234 4218 4219 4238 4234 4212 4208 4216 4240 4235 4216 4238 4213 4231 4243 4209 4239 4010412241764213 4209 4233 4 18 8 42064417 4 16 4421140184210 40084307 4226 4419 43114401411743054244 4225 4235 4238 422542304406 4105430143034401 4120 4221 4 1 6 0 4201 4236 401440164226 4220 4109 4220 4216 4324 4215 42054206 4116 4005 4211 4 1 5 0 4232 4117 4105 4231 4208 4121 4114 4217 40 0 6 4215 4100 4224 4121 4232 4113 4 11 6 4222 412641124108 4501 4222 4407 44124410 4205 4010420743244103 4234 4230 4203 4224 4104 4212 4113 4200 4 1 2 0 4213 4219 4212 440842164404 4410 440543154109 4246 4121 4406 4052400644044231440042264108423543174370 4239 4233 4015 4227 4230 4238 4234 4212 440544064221 41034235 4247 44144205441341114214 44024 2 12 42424243 4217 4237 4229 4222 4242 410941154 21 0 41124237 4223 4312 4413 4239 4242 4229 4243 4227 4223 4400 4228 4219 4236 42134232 4248 41074411 4200 4240 4310430842154223 4240 40224206 440341254124 4245 4237432142254225 4221 4409422343084213 431 54306 44164311412843104242 4313421 842154217 411343174108 43044240 4219 4 3 0 5 42004227 4228 4102 4 3 1 143164228 422445024224 4204 43144231 4 30 7 4232 42414504 4302421245004227 42024231 4309 4208 440543124212 4220 44074407422443004224 4216 4244 4015 4223 4021 450144034216 4211 4233 4220 4227 4249 4215 43164219 4241 422944084301 4 4 0 74409 4365 4120 43304112 4116 4 401 43004014 4305 430943094361 440643064313401142064312 4209 4368 430740204200 4305420142174304417143034244 414143084307 4205 4315 4204 4247 41554313 41014215 41073947 4313 4005 4008 4202 4360 4246 4245 4012 4010 4309 4001 4043 44004408 4 3 2 4 430243 01413041014201 42494310 4338 421042074350 4364 4202420842124058 4330 40044300 42144334 4245 41324 3 1 8 421341094342 4247 4211411141134311 4248 42004243 4307 4303 4344 4301 42474246 44164411420042094315 40604352 40484221 4315 4246 4353 4420 43134204420841104201 4348 40174411 430344154417 4115 4201 4405 4201 4401 42284232 4236 4240 4244 PROJECT LIMITS LYNN AVEGRIMES AVECROCKER AVESIDELL TRLMORNINGSIDE RD W 4 4 T H S T B R A N S O N S T LITTEL STOAKDALE AVEW 42ND ST KIPLING AVELYNN AVEMONTEREY AVEOAKDALE AVECITY OF ST. LOUIS PARKCITY OF EDINA/ Engineering DeptJanuary 2019 2022 Project AreaMorningside D and E Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionCITYOFEDINAMIN N ESOTAINCORPOR A T E D1888 ,e 6200 6320 5008 5020 5012 5113 6205 5109 309 6228 5012 5109 402 300 308 300 517 5152 500 6201 5117 5117 5017 5125 5113 5124 5137 5123 6321 604 5020 64055101 5016 64096413 6405 6408 6501 6400 304 6223 6404 5101 5024 5025 412 6200 5021 5025 62176233 5016 6204 413 5020 6201 5004 5005 5101 5000 5121 6519 5008 5009 308 5013 609 6229 4916 6300 6220 5004 421 421420420 6225 5115 512 5000 6419 6328 5021 409 5017 412 6501 51086300 5105 6229 6417 6304306 309 5125 6214 5100 4900 412 304 413 417416 401 417 405 409 413 304 413 416 409 417 416 412 405 408 404 314 6501 401 605 315 301 309 305 309308 5011 305 317 408 516 301 316 400 301 315 301 524 311 311 505 409 532 408 413 4917 63016300 305 300 405 6512 308 409 6424 501 505 6424 6212 315 6308509 4920 6224 6304 6220 509 6413 404 529 5021 501 306 5025 509 6224 301 6201 6308 404 504 4921 500 4925 6409 404 305 5111 309 6312313 417 6221 4901 6508 6412 312 508 412 4929 421 6321 6424 4928 4924 4905 5116 513 417 510 5117 504 6405 63204904 545 6301 420 321 6424 6420 5108 300 5112 6401 6428 421 6501 6512 408 6421 513 6420 6425 500 6433 6404 521 416 4909 544 6416 6309 6429 631665116517 6416310 414 6509 541 6305 6400 6313 6216 6305630963136208 540 6408 6324 62286216517 533 6320 537 521 62286412 5125 306 6202 PROJECT LIMITS BLAKE RDBLAKE RDCity of Edina City of HopkinsSPRUCE RD BELMORE LN MALONEY AVE WATERMAN AVE MENDELSSOHN LN INTERLACHEN BLVD INTERLACHEN BLVD LAKE RIDGE RD SCRIVER RDOAK BEND LN/ Engineering DeptJanuary 2019 2022 Project AreaBlake RoadRoadway ReconstructionCITYOFEDINAMIN N ESOTAINCORPOR A T E D1888 ,e Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.H. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-101: Requesting Variance from State Aid Standards for Blake Road from Spruce Road to Scriver Road Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2021-101 to request variance from State Aid Standards for Blake Road from Spruce Road to Scriver Road. INTRODUCTION: Many of our Municipal State Aid (MSA) streets were constructed prior to MSA standards and were built with limited space to adjust. Because of the horizontal constraints, MSA standards for curves meeting a 30-mph design can not be met without major impacts to existing private property. Staff is seeking a variance for 25-mph curves to limit impacts to private property. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-101: Requesting Variance from State Aid RESOLUTION NO. 2021-101 REQUESTING VARIANCE FROM STANDARDS FOR STATE AID OPERATIONS BLAKE ROAD FROM SPRUCE ROAD TO SCRIVER ROAD WHEREAS, the City of Edina Director of Engineering is hereby authorized to request a variance from the Minnesota Department of Transportation State Aid Operations, pursuant to Minnesota Rules for State Aid Operations 8820.9936, as they apply to the proposed horizontal curves for the reconstruction of Blake Road (MSAS 177) from Spruce Road to Interlachen Boulevard and Blake Road (MSAS 147) from Interlachen Boulevard to Scriver Road, State Aid Projects 120-177-006 and 120-147-014, respectively, located in Edina, Minnesota and Hennepin County; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Rules for State Aid Operation 8820.9936 require a minimum 30 miles per hour design speed for horizontal curvature; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Edina believes that the minimum design standards set forth by Minnesota Rules for State Aid Operation 8820.9936 as applicable to the proposed horizontal curve on Blake Road from 80 feet to 150 feet south of Waterman Avenue, to meet 30 miles per hour design speed create undue hardships; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Edina believes that the minimum design standards set forth by Minnesota Rules for State Aid Operation 8820.9936 as applicable to the proposed horizontal curve on Blake Road from Oak Bend Lane to Interlachen Boulevard, to meet 30 miles per hour design speed create undue hardships; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Edina, located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby requests a variance from the Minnesota Department of Transportation State Aid Operations Rules Chapter 8820.9936, Minimum Design Standard, Urban; New or Reconstruction Projects to allow on Blake Road: 1. Two horizontal curves that achieve 25 mile per hour design speed in lieu of the 30 mile per hour minimum design speed on Blake Road from Spruce Road to Scriver Road. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby indemnifies, saves and holds harmless the State of Minnesota and its agents and employees of and from claims, demands, actions, or causes of action arising out of, or by reason of the granting of the variances in accordance with Minnesota Rules 8820.9936 and further agrees to defend at its sole cost and expense, any action or proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim arising as a result of the granting of these variances. Dated: November 3, 2021 Attest:___________________________ _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 3, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of _____________, 20___. ____________________________________ City Clerk Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.I. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator Item Activity: Subject:Approve Contract Amendment with Tyler Technologies Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve amendment to existing contract with Tyler Technologies. INTRODUCTION: The Health Division currently utilizes multiple software programs for the tracking of services, inspections and data, resulting in inefficient cross-section data management and reporting, and requiring more staff time to input data. In addition, there are currently no databases for bias and discrimination complaints and reporting. The Center for Disease control identified stigma as a basis of discrimination during the COVID-19 pandemic. Certain racial and ethnic minority groups, individuals with disabilities, emergency responders and healthcare workers, people who have underlying health conditions, and individuals living in congregate setting are more likely to experience discrimination due to COVID-19. Efficient and effective health data and tracking mechanisms are an essential public health response. This is an amendment to the existing contract for Human Resources and Finance software with Tyler Technologies. This existing contract was approved by Council on October 15, 2019. The additional software will replace multiple software systems and save staff time during data input, management, and reporting. Funding for this item was approved as part of the Final Spending Plan for Edina's American Rescue Act Plan Funds Round 1 on September 9, 2021. This agenda item is approving the contract amendment. ATTACHMENTS: Description Contract Amendment: Tyler Technologies 1 AMENDMENT This amendment (“Amendment”) is effective as of the date of signature of the last party to sign as indicated below (“Amendment Effective Date”), by and between Tyler Technologies, Inc. with offices at One Tyler Drive, Yarmouth, Maine 04096 (“Tyler”) and the City of Edina, Minnesota, with offices at 4801 W 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 (“Client”). WHEREAS, Tyler and the Client are parties to an agreement dated October 15, 2019 (“Agreement”); and WHEREAS, Tyler and Client desire to amend the terms of the Agreement as provided herein. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises hereinafter contained, Tyler and the Client agree as follows: 1. The items set forth in the sales quotation attached as Exhibit 1 to this Amendment are hereby added to the Agreement as of the Amendment Effective Date. Payment of fees and costs for such items shall conform to the following terms: a. License Fees. License fees will be invoiced as follows: i. 25% on the Amendment Effective Date; ii. 30% on the date when Tyler provides the Client with access to the applicable Tyler Software (the “Software Access Date”); iii. 25% on the earlier-of (a) the start date of implementation of the Tyler Software, or (b) June 1, 2022; and iv. 20% on the earlier-of (a) the go-live date for the Tyler Software, or (b) July 1, 2023. b. Maintenance Fees. Year 1 maintenance and support fees are waived through the earlier of (a) availability of the Tyler Software for use in a live production environment; or (b) one (1) year from the Amendment Effective Date. Year 2 maintenance and support fees, prorated for a time period commencing on the earlier-of date above and ending at the same time as the end of the then-current annual maintenance term for the Tyler Software already licensed under the Agreement, are invoiced on the earlier-of date above. Annual maintenance and support fees for year 2 and subsequent annual renewal terms will be due annually thereafter, at our then-current rates, subject to the maximum yearly increase amounts set forth in Exhibit C, paragraph 3, of the Agreement c. SaaS Fees. Year 1 SaaS (including hosting) fees, prorated for a time period commencing the first day of the first month following the Amendment Effective Date and ending at the same time as the end of the then-current annual maintenance term for the Tyler Software already licensed under the Agreement, are invoiced on the Amendment Effective Date. Annual SaaS fees for the initial year one term are set forth in the Amendment Investment Summary. Subsequent annual SaaS fees are due annually thereafter, at Tyler’s then-current rate, subject to the maximum yearly increase 2 amounts for software maintenance and support, as set forth in Exhibit C, paragraph 3, of the Agreement. d. Conversions. Fixed-fee conversions are invoiced 50% upon initial delivery of the converted data, by conversion option, and 50% upon Client acceptance to load the converted data into Live/Production environment, by conversion option. Where conversions are quoted as estimated, Tyler will bill Client the actual services delivered on a time and materials basis. e. Services Fees & Expenses. Services added to the Agreement pursuant to this Amendment, along with applicable expenses, shall be invoiced as provided and/or incurred. f. Hardware Fees. Fees for Hardware are due on delivery of the respective Hardware. g. Systems Management Services. Annual fees for Systems Management Services are invoiced on the Software Access Date and are provided in accordance with the terms of service for Tyler Systems Management found here: https://www.tylertech.com/terms/tyler-systems-management-terms-of-service. 2. Client acknowledges that the Tyler Software set forth in the Amendment Investment Summary as subscription or software as a service (“SaaS”) do not include perpetual rights. If Client does not pay the required annual fee, Client’s right to use the applicable Software will be suspended unless and until payment in full has been made. Tyler Software provided as SaaS is subject to the Tyler SaaS Services Terms and Service Level Agreement found here: https://www.tylertech.com/terms/tyler-saas-services. 3. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement. 4. Except as expressly indicated in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the dates set forth below. Tyler Technologies, Inc. City of Edina, MN By: By: Name: Name: Title: Title: Date: Date: Exhibit 1 3 Exhibit 1 Amendment Investment Summary The following Amendment Investment Summary details the software and services to be delivered by us to you under this Amendment. This Amendment Investment Summary is effective as of the Amendment Effective Date. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined will have the meaning assigned to such terms in the Agreement. In the event a comment in the following sales quotation conflicts with a provision of this Amendment, the provision in this Amendment shall control. Sales quotation to be inserted prior to amendment execution. REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Quoted By:Alban Michaud Date:10/20/2021 Quote Expiration:12/21/2021 Quote Name:City of Edina-ERP-EnerGov Quote Number:2021-130322 Quote Description:EnerGov Pricing - On Premise Sales Quotation For City of Edina 4801 W 50th St Edina, MN 55424-1394 Phone +1 (952) 927-8861 SaaS One Time Fees Description # Years Annual Fee Impl. Hours Impl. Cost Data Conversion Additional: EnerGov Advanced Automation Bundle 1 $22,918.00 40 $7,000.00 $0.00 EnerGov Decision Engine 1 $12,500.00 8 $1,400.00 $0.00 Sub-Total: $35,418.00 $8,400.00 $0.00 Less Discount: $3,542.00 $0.00 $0.00 TOTAL: $31,876.00 48 $8,400.00 $0.00 Tyler Software and Related Services Description License Impl. Hours Impl. Cost Data Conversion Module Total Year One Maintenance Additional: EnerGov Business Management Suite (13)$39,000.00 264 $46,200.00 $12,925.00 $98,125.00 $7,800.00 EnerGov Citizen Self Service - Business Management $22,570.00 24 $4,200.00 $0.00 $26,770.00 $4,514.00 EnerGov Core Foundation Bundle $5,500.00 24 $4,200.00 $0.00 $9,700.00 $1,100.00 EnerGov iG Workforce Apps (13)$13,000.00 16 $2,800.00 $0.00 $15,800.00 $2,600.00 Tyler 311/Incident Management $19,101.00 80 $14,000.00 $0.00 $33,101.00 $3,820.00 Tyler GIS (13)$6,500.00 8 $1,400.00 $0.00 $7,900.00 $1,300.00 2021-130322 - EnerGov Pricing - On Premise CONFIDENTIAL 1 of 7 Tyler Software and Related Services Description License Impl. Hours Impl. Cost Data Conversion Module Total Year One Maintenance Tyler System Management Services Contract $0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,284.00 Sub-Total:$105,671.00 $72,800.00 $12,925.00 $191,396.00 $26,418.00 Less Discount:$10,567.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,567.00 $21,134.00 TOTAL:$95,104.00 416 $72,800.00 $12,925.00 $180,829.00 $5,284.00 Other Services Description Quantity Unit Price Unit Discount Extended Price Project Management 56 $175.00 $0.00 $9,800.00 TOTAL: $9,800.00 Summary One Time Fees Recurring Fees Total Tyler Software $95,104.00 $5,284.00 Total SaaS $0.00 $31,876.00 Total Tyler Services $103,925.00 $0.00 Total 3rd Party Hardware, Software and Services $0.00 $0.00 Summary Total $199,029.00 $37,160.00 Contract Total (Excluding Estimated Travel Expenses) $236,189.00 Estimated Travel Expenses $6,530.00 2021-130322 - EnerGov Pricing - On Premise CONFIDENTIAL 2 of 7 Detailed Breakdown of Conversions (included in Contract Total) Description Unit Price Unit Discount Extended Price EnerGov Business Management - Conversion $12,925.00 $0.00 $12,925.00 TOTAL: $12,925.00 2021-130322 - EnerGov Pricing - On Premise CONFIDENTIAL 3 of 7 Optional SaaS One Time Fees Description # Years Annual Fee Impl. Hours Impl. Cost Data Conversion Additional: MyCivic Bundle 0 $16,000.00 88 $15,400.00 $0.00 TOTAL:$16,000.00 88 $15,400.00 $0.00 Optional Tyler Software & Related Services Description License Impl. Hours Impl. Cost Data Conversion Module Total Year One Maintenance Additional: EnerGov Citizen Self Service - Community Development $22,570.00 24 $4,200.00 $0.00 $26,770.00 $4,514.00 EnerGov Community Development Suite (10)$30,000.00 556 $97,300.00 $25,850.00 $153,150.00 $6,000.00 EnerGov e-Reviews $44,039.00 120 $21,000.00 $0.00 $65,039.00 $8,808.00 TOTAL:$96,609.00 700 $122,500.00 $25,850.00 $244,959.00 $19,322.00 Optional Conversion Details (Prices Reflected Above) Description Unit Price Unit Discount Extended Price EnerGov Community Development - Conversion $25,850.00 $0.00 $25,850.00 TOTAL:$25,850.00 Unless otherwise indicated in the contract or amendment thereto, pricing for optional items will be held for six (6) months from the Quote date or the Effective Date of the contract, whichever is later. Customer Approval: Date: Print Name: P.O. #: All primary values quoted in US Dollars Tyler Discount Detail Description License License Discount License Net Maintenance Basis Year One Maint Discount Year One Maint Net Additional: 2021-130322 - EnerGov Pricing - On Premise CONFIDENTIAL 4 of 7 Tyler Discount Detail Description License License Discount License Net Maintenance Basis Year One Maint Discount Year One Maint Net EnerGov Business Management Suite (13)$39,000.00 $3,900.00 $35,100.00 $7,800.00 $7,800.00 $0.00 EnerGov Citizen Self Service - Business Management $22,570.00 $2,257.00 $20,313.00 $4,514.00 $4,514.00 $0.00 EnerGov Core Foundation Bundle $5,500.00 $550.00 $4,950.00 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 $0.00 EnerGov iG Workforce Apps (13)$13,000.00 $1,300.00 $11,700.00 $2,600.00 $2,600.00 $0.00 Tyler 311/Incident Management $19,101.00 $1,910.00 $17,191.00 $3,820.00 $3,820.00 $0.00 Tyler GIS (13)$6,500.00 $650.00 $5,850.00 $1,300.00 $1,300.00 $0.00 Tyler System Management Services Contract $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,284.00 $0.00 $5,284.00 TOTAL:$105,671.00 $10,567.00 $95,104.00 $26,418.00 $21,134.00 $5,284.00 2021-130322 - EnerGov Pricing - On Premise CONFIDENTIAL 5 of 7 Comments Client agrees that items in this sales quotation are, upon Client's signature or approval of same, hereby added to the existing agreement ("Agreement") between the parties and subject to its terms. Additionally, payment for said items, as applicable but subject to any listed assumptions herein, shall conform to the following terms: •License fees for Tyler and third party software are invoiced upon the earlier of (i) deliver of the license key or (ii) when Tyler makes such software available for download by the Client; •Fees for hardware are invoiced upon delivery; •Fees for year one of hardware maintenance are invoiced upon delivery of the hardware; •Annual Maintenance and Support fees, SaaS fees, Hosting fees, and Subscription fees are first payable when Tyler makes the software available for download by the Client (for Maintenance) or on the first day of the month following the date this quotation was signed (for SaaS, Hosting, and Subscription), and any such fees are prorated to align with the applicable term under the Agreement, with renewals invoiced annually thereafter in accord with the Agreement. •Fees for services included in this sales quotation shall be invoiced as indicated below. o Implementation and other professional services fees shall be invoiced as delivered. o Fixed-fee Business Process Consulting services shall be invoiced 50% upon delivery of the Best Practice Recommendations, by module, and 50% upon delivery of custom desktop procedures, by module. o Fixed-fee conversions are invoiced 50% upon initial delivery of the converted data, by conversion option, and 50% upon Client acceptance to load the converted data into Live/Production environment, by conversion option. Where conversions are quoted as estimated, Tyler will invoice Client the actual services delivered on a time and materials basis. o Except as otherwise provided, other fixed price services are invoiced upon complete delivery of the service. For the avoidance of doubt, where "Project Planning Services" are provided, payment shall be invoiced upon delivery of the Implementation Planning document. Dedicated Project Management services, if any, will be invoiced monthly in arrears, beginning on the first day of the month immediately following initiation of project planning. o If Client has purchased any change management services, those services will be invoiced in accordance with the Agreement. o Notwithstanding anything to the contrary stated above, the following payment terms shall apply to services fees specifically for migrations: Tyler will invoice Client 50% of any Migration Fees listed above upon Client approval of the product suite migration schedule. The remaining 50%, by line item, will be billed upon the go-live of the applicable product suite. Tyler will invoice Client for any Project Management Fees listed above upon the go-live of the first product suite. Unless otherwise indicated on this Sales quotation, annual services will be invoiced in advance, for annual terms commencing on the date this sales quotation is signed by the Client. If listed annual service(s) is an addition to the same service presently existing under the Agreement, the first term of the added annual service will be prorated to expire coterminous with the existing annual term for the service, with renewals to occur as indicated in the Agreement. •Expenses associated with onsite services are invoiced as incurred. Tyler System Management Services is calculated at 25% of the Munis annual maintenance. There is a $2,500 minimum annual fee. Conversion prices are based on a single occurrence of the database. If additional databases need to be converted, these will need to be quoted. Tyler's quote contains estimates of the amount of services needed, based on our preliminary understanding of the size and scope of your project. The actual amount of services depends on such factors as your level of involvement in the project and the speed of knowledge transfer. 2021-130322 - EnerGov Pricing - On Premise CONFIDENTIAL 6 of 7 Comments Unless otherwise noted, prices submitted in the quote do not include travel expenses incurred in accordance with Tyler's then-current Business Travel Policy. Tyler's prices do not include applicable local, city or federal sales, use excise, personal property or other similar taxes or duties, which you are responsible for determining and remitting. Installations are completed remotely, but can be done onsite upon request at an additional cost. In the event Client cancels services less than two (2) weeks in advance, Client is liable to Tyler for (i) all non-refundable expenses incurred by Tyler on Client's behalf; and (ii) daily fees associated with the cancelled services if Tyler is unable to re-assign its personnel. Implementation hours are scheduled and delivered in four (4) or eight (8) hour increments. Tyler provides onsite training for a maximum of 12 people per class. In the event that more than 12 users wish to participate in a training class or more than one occurrence of a class is needed, Tyler will either provide additional days at then-current rates for training or Tyler will utilize a Train-the-Trainer approach whereby the client designated attendees of the initial training can thereafter train the remaining users. Tyler's pricing is based on the scope of proposed products and services being obtained from Tyler. Should portions of the scope of products or services be removed by the Client, Tyler reserves the right to adjust prices for the remaining scope accordingly. Project Management includes project planning, kickoff meeting, status calls, task monitoring, verification and transition to support. EnerGov e-Reviews requires Bluebeam Studio Prime, at an estimated yearly subscription cost of $3,000/100 users. Further pricing detail is available by contacting Bluebeam at https://www.bluebeam.com/solutions/studio-prime Business Management Forms Library Includes: 1 Licensing - Business License, 1 Licensing - Business License Renewal, 1 Licensing - Business License Delinquent, 1 Licensing - Profession License, 1 Licensing - Profession License Renewal, 1 Licensing --Profession License Delinquent. Community Development Forms Library Includes: 1 Permits - Building, 1 Permits - Trade, 1 Planning - Certificate, 1 Permits - Occupancy/Completion, 1 Code - Violation Notice. Development modifications, interfaces and services, where applicable, shall be invoiced to the client in the following manner: 50% of total upon authorized signature to proceed on program specifications and the remaining 50% of total upon delivery of modifications, interface and services. Tyler System Management Services is calculated at 25% of annual maintenance. The quoted value is in addition to your current Tyler System Management Services and will be subject to an annual increase at our then current pricing. EnerGov Business Management: Tyler leads and owns the "Assess and Define" and "Configuration" of 5 unique business transactions, 5 template business transactions, 3 geo- rules and 3 automation events. Configuration elements beyond this will be owned by the client. EnerGov Community Development: Tyler leads and owns the "Assess and Define" and "Configuration" of 10 unique business transactions, 10 template business transactions, 5 geo-rules and 5 automation events. Configuration elements beyond this will be owned by the client. 2021-130322 - EnerGov Pricing - On Premise CONFIDENTIAL 7 of 7 Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.J. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Brian Olson, Director of Public Works Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Water Treatment Plant No. 6 Filter Improvements Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for Water Treatment Plant No. 6 Filter Improvements with AE2S for $34,300. INTRODUCTION: This purchase is for design, bidding and construction management of WTP No. 6 filter improvements. Proposed project will improve and extend filter runtimes, operational efficiencies and more consistent filter backwash or cleaning results. Engineer's estimate for Professional Services, programming/start up and construction is $480,184. See attached Request for Purchase. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: WTP No. 6 Filter Improvements Agreement Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12100217 Department:Public Works Buyer:Dave Goergen Date: 10/13/2021 Requisition Description:Water Treatment Plant (WTP) 6 Filter Improvements Vendor: Cost:$34,300.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:QUOTE/BD - QUOTE/BID DESCRIPTION:New filter media and process improvements BUDGET IMPACT: Util Fund - Water Environmental Impact - item specific: 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:Improvement to water use efficiencies - less water loss to waste Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle:n/a Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): n/a Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? - Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: - MPG: Carbon Emissions: September 22, 2021 City of Edina Mr. Brian Olson Public Works Director 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Re: Supplemental Letter Agreement Water Treatment Plant No. 6 Filter Improvements Design, Bidding, and Construction Phase Services City of Edina, MN Dear Mr. Olson: Thank you for this opportunity to provide this professional services proposal for the Water Treatment Plant (WTP) No. 6 Filter Improvements project. The following letter provides a general overview of our understanding and the proposed scope of services, anticipated timeline, and estimate of associated professional fees. Project Understanding Our project understanding is based on the results and findings of the filter evaluation conducted by AE2S on May 18th and 19th, 2021. The project generally consists of engineering services related to the electrical, process, and I&C services to ultimately improve operational control of the existing pressure filter vessels at WTP No. 6. Scope of Services Based on this understanding of the project, we anticipate that the professional services will be executed as a design, bid, build project with one (1) bid package. This proposal defines the scope of services for these Professional Engineering Services. Phase 030 – Preliminary Design 1. Design – AE2S will evaluate the existing electrical and process drawings and specifications to prepare a design that accomplishes the following tasks: a. Backwash from Distribution System: i. Provide a connection and associated pipe, valves, fittings, and instrumentation to reconfigure the backwash supply to be from distribution (current backwash source is from well). ii. Provide necessary electrical and I&C modifications. City of Edina Water Treatment Plant No. 6 Filter Improvements Page 2 of 5 b. Filter Improvements: i. Consider removal of existing internal combined air/water backwash troughs. Design new backwash collection system. ii. Media replacement. Anthracite replacement at a minimum; consider silica sand replacement (as Alternate 1). iii. Consider upsizing air backwash blowers to increase capacity to 5 scfm/sq ft of filter area. 1 duty, 1 standby (part of Alternate 1). iv. Replace filter cell air release valves with combined air release/vacuum valves. v. Design required piping, valves, fittings, and connections to add a drain down step in the backwash procedure that allows for an air scour only step in the sequence. c. Filter Control Improvements: i. Currently, the existing filters do not consistently operate under pressure. To provide operational control, the design will include the addition of a backpressure sustaining valve on the combined filter effluent piping system. 2. Meetings – Meeting to discuss preliminary design (1 AE2S person) 3. Drafting – (5-10 sheets) Provide detailed process and electrical drawings of the necessary improvements. 4. Specification Development – Develop draft specification(s) 5. Construction Cost Estimate – Provide an approximate construction cost estimate Phase 040 - Final Design 1. Design – AE2S will execute a final design that effectively details the purchase and installation of the necessary equipment by a contractor to achieve design tasks detailed in the preliminary design phase. 2. MDH Review and Approval – Administer MDH review process ahead of project bidding. 3. Meetings – Meeting to discuss final bid package. (1 AE2S person) 4. Drafting – (5-10 sheets) Provide detailed process and electrical drawings of the necessary improvements. 5. Specification Development – Develop specification(s) for equipment procurement and installation. 6. Construction Cost Estimate – Provide an approximate construction cost estimate. Phase 050: Bidding/Negotiations 1. Addenda/Contractor Questions – Administer addenda and contractor questions. 2. Pre-Bid Meeting – Facilitate meeting and walkthrough of the facility with prospective bidders. 3. Bid Opening – Administer bid opening with City representation. City of Edina Water Treatment Plant No. 6 Filter Improvements Page 3 of 5 4. Recommendation of Award – Supply a letter of recommendation to the City for the Recommendation of a contractor to complete the work. Phase 060: Construction Services 1. Construction Kickoff Meeting – Attend kickoff meeting with Contractor to review scope of work. 2. Site Visit (8 Hours) – 2 hours each visit, assumes 4 site visits throughout construction duration 3. Shop Drawing Review – (10 Hours) Review equipment data for installed equipment. 4. Startup Services – (8 Hours) startup observation and assistance. 5. Installation Documentation – (4 Hours) Complete record drawings. 6. Construction Administration – (8 Hours) Administer miscellaneous construction documentation (ie. pay applications, field orders, up to 2 change orders) Additional Services All additional Scope of Service items identified in the Master Agreement for Professional Engineering Services in Paragraphs 2.2 Preliminary Design Phase, 2.3 Final Design Phase, 2.4 Bidding or Negotiating Phase, and 2.5 Construction Phase (dated March 7, 2017) are acknowledged as components of this Agreement and included in scope defined in this Supplemental Letter Agreement. Services resulting from significant changes in the general scope, extent, or character of the Assignment are not included as a part of the Scope of Basic Services. If authorized in writing by the CLIENT, AE2S will provide services beyond the scope of this Scope of Work on an hourly basis in accordance with the current Hourly Fee Schedule on file with the Client. CLIENT’S Responsibilities CLIENT shall do the following in a timely manner, so as not to delay the services of AE2S: 1. Designate a person to act as CLIENT’s representative with respect to the services to be rendered under this Agreement. Such person shall have authority to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define CLIENT’s policies and decisions with respect to services for the Assignment. 2. Provide relevant information regarding requirements for the Assignment. AE2S shall be entitled to use and rely upon all information provided by CLIENT or others in performing AE2S’s services under this Agreement. 3. Provide access to the relevant site sufficient for AE2S to performs its services under this Agreement. 4. CLIENT shall, so long as AE2S is not in default, promptly pay AE2S for such services as have been performed satisfactorily hereunder in accordance with the fee terms set forth herein. City of Edina Water Treatment Plant No. 6 Filter Improvements Page 4 of 5 CLIENT shall bear all costs incident to compliance with its responsibilities pursuant to this section. Proposed Professional Fees AE2S shall render services under this Agreement on an hourly basis in accordance with our Hourly Fee Schedule. ENGINEER proposes to complete the Scope of Services on an hourly not to exceed basis. A breakdown of the estimated costs for the Scope of Services is as follows: Phase Fee Preliminary Design Phase $ 12,300 Final Design Phase $ 13,200 Bidding Phase $ 2,100 Construction Phase $ 6,700 Total $ 34,300 Compensation shall not exceed $34,300 without written authorization from the CLIENT. AE2S proposes to provide the above professional engineering services in accordance with the Master Agreement for Professional Engineering Services between the City of Edina and Advanced Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. (AE2S), dated March 7, 2017. Performance Schedule AE2S shall use commercially reasonable efforts to complete Basic Services within a reasonable time period. Acceptance If this Scope of Work sets forth your understanding of our agreement, including the desired, fees, terms, and conditions, please sign in the space provided and return a copy to AE2S. Thank you for the opportunity to assist in this project and we look forward to working with you. Sincerely, Abbie Browen Project Manager City of Edina Water Treatment Plant No. 6 Filter Improvements Page 5 of 5 AE2S CLIENT Accepted this _____ day of __________________________, 2021 By: _______________________________ By: ________________________________ Abbie Browen Name (Print): ________________________ Title: Operations Manager Title: ______________________________ Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.K. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Gunnar Kaasa, Equipment Operations Supervisor Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Sewer and Water Pump Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for sewer and water pump replacement from Thompson Pump Manufacturing Company for $57,168. INTRODUCTION: The utility department is replacing a 34 year old water pump that is very noisy with a new quiet pump that will pump both water and sewage when needed. T he old pump has no EPA standard rating on the diesel engine while the new replacement pump is a tier 4 diesel engine that is quieter and will get better fuel economy. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Sewer and Water Pump Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12100201 Department:Public Works Buyer:Brian Olson Date: 09/28/2021 Requisition Description:Thompson water/sewer pump Vendor:THOMPSON PUMP AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY INC Cost:$57,167.88 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:STATE K - STATE CONTRACT DESCRIPTION:update old water pump BUDGET IMPACT: utility equipment replacement fund Environmental Impact - item specific: 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT:very quiet pump, residents will not be disturbed. more fuel efficient ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:30% reduction in fuel usage Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle:2022 Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): 1999 Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? YES - YES Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: - MPG:no info Carbon Emissions:no info Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.L. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Gunnar Kaasa, Equipment Operations Supervisor Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: 2022 Western Star Tandem- Axle Truck with Plow Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase of 2022 Western Star Tandem-Axle Truck with Plow from Boyer Truck and TBEI Equipment for $261,173. INTRODUCTION: This is a replacement for vehicle #25-346, a 2007 Tandem axle plow truck. It has outlived its useful life and needs replacement. Our new equipment replacement scoring methodology uses six performance and cost variables including age, usage, type of service, condition, repair costs and reliability. Replacement qualification scores are: 23 for all sedans and light trucks and 28 for heavy duty vehicles and off road equipment whose gross weight rating (GVWR) exceeds 10,500. T he higher the score, the higher the need to replace the vehicle. In other words, we will not replace a heavy duty vehicle that does not have a minimum score of 28. T his piece of equipment has a score of 34. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: 2022 Western Star Truck with Plow Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12100206 Department:Public Works Buyer:Brian Olson Date: 10/01/2021 Requisition Description:Western Star truck with Jcraft plow and Box. Vendor:BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC Cost:$261,173.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:STATE K - STATE CONTRACT DESCRIPTION:update older vehicle BUDGET IMPACT: PW equipment replacement fund Environmental Impact - item specific: 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT:Less carbon ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:30% reduction in fuel usage Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle:western 2022 Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): Sterling 2007 Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? YES - YES Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: - MPG:no info Carbon Emissions:no info Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.M. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Tom Swenson, Assistant Director of Parks and Natural Resources Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: 2022 Ford F250 4x4 Truck Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase of 2022 Ford F250 4x4 Truck from Boyer Ford for $41,198. INTRODUCTION: Boyer Ford will provide a 2022 F250 4x4 truck to replace a 2007 Chevrolet Truck vehicle number 47-216. This truck supports park operations including removing snow from parking lots and trails. Energy efficiency technology for commercial vehicles such as this truck has not advance noticeably in the last 20 years, thus this replacement vehicle is excepted from the Green Fleet P olicy. However, the new engine technology will be an improvement over the 2007 truck. In addition, this diesel truck will replace a gasoline truck. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: 2022 Ford F250 4x4 Truck Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12200004 Department:Parks & Recreation Buyer:Tom Swenson Date: 10/17/2021 Requisition Description:2022 F250 Ford Plow Truck Vendor:MIDWAY FORD COMPANY Cost:$41,198.68 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:STATE K - STATE CONTRACT DESCRIPTION:Replace truck used for plowing. BUDGET IMPACT: Equipment replacement fund. Environmental Impact - item specific: 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT:Used to support trailering and snow plowing.. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:Switch from Gas to Diesel. Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle:Ford F250 2022 Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): Chevy 1500 2007 Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? NO - NO Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: TECHDELY - NEW TECHNOLOGY IS DELAYED MPG:1.8 est. Carbon Emissions:Unknown Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.N. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Tom Swenson, Assistant Director of Parks and Natural Resources Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: 2022 Western Star Truck and Log Loader Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase of 2022 Western Star 4700 truck from Boyer Ford for $114,702 and P alfinger Epsilon M13A80 log loader package from ABM Equipment for $134,740 for a total cost of $249,442. INTRODUCTION: Forestry operations rely upon the use of a large-scale log loader vehicle to remove tree material and debris from work sites. This purchase request replaces the 2003 log loader vehicle number 47-380 and related attachments as these requisitions are for one vehicle. Boyer Ford will provide the truck and ABM equipment will provide the log loader equipment package. Energy efficiency technology for large equipment such as the log loader has not advanced noticeably in the last 20 years, thus this replacement vehicle is exempted from the Green Fleet P olicy. However, the new engine technology will be an improvement over the 2003 truck. This log loader truck supports tree operations and Parks throughout Edina and would be used to remove debris from any potential tree storms. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: 2022 Western Star 4700 Request for Purchase: Palfinger Log Loader Package Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12200001 Department:Parks & Recreation Buyer:Tom Swenson Date: 10/10/2021 Requisition Description:Western Star Cab and Chassis Tandem Axel Truck Vendor:BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC Cost:$114,702.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:STATE K - STATE CONTRACT DESCRIPTION:Replacing 18 year old log loader truck. BUDGET IMPACT: Equipment replacement funding. Environmental Impact - item specific: 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT:Supports forestry operations including streets clear during storms. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:Supports diseased tree operations. Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle:2022 Western Star 4700 Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): 2004 Sterling Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? NO - NO Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: TECHDELY - NEW TECHNOLOGY IS DELAYED MPG:Unknown Carbon Emissions:Unknown Request for Purchase Requisition Number 1 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov | 952-927-8861 12200002 Department:Parks & Recreation Buyer:Tom Swenson Date: 10/10/2021 Requisition Description:Palfinger Epsilon M13A80 log loader package Vendor:ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY Cost:$134,740.00 REPLACEMENT or NEW:REPLACEM - REPLACEMENT PURCHASE SOURCE:STATE K - STATE CONTRACT DESCRIPTION:Replacing 18 year old log loader attachment. BUDGET IMPACT: Equipment replacement funding. Environmental Impact - item specific: 2 COMMUNITY IMPACT:Supports tree operations including streets clear during storms. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:Supports diseased tree operations. Vehicle - Make/Model/Year requested vehicle:This is a vehicle attachment Vehicle - Make/Model/Year current vehicle (if replacement): Vehicle - Does purchase meet Green Fleet Recommendations? - Vehicle - If does not meet Green Fleet Recommendations, justification: - MPG:NA Carbon Emissions:NA Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.O. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Tracy Petersen, Assistant Director-Recreation & Facilities Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-102: Accepting Grant from Innovations for Aging LLC for Senior Center Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2021-102 accepting Innovations for Aging LLC d/b/a Trellis Grant Funding for the Aging Mastery P rogram at the Senior Center. INTRODUCTION: Following the successful grant funded Aging Mastery Program that was held this fall at the Edina Senior Center, the Juniper initiative is providing a continued series of 13 programs designed to help older adults maintain confidence about living independently and improve overall health. The City of Edina and Innovations for Aging LLC d/b/a Trellis will enter into a grant agreement where Innovations for Aging LLC d/b/a Trellis will provide payment to the City of Edina based on participant registration per class session. A variety of sessions will be offered in winter 2022. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-102: Accepting Innovations for Aging, LLC Grant Funding Innovations for Aging LLC Grant Agreement Resolution No. 2021-102 Accepting Innovations for Aging, LLC d/b/a Trellis Grant Funding WHEREAS, Innovations for Aging, LLC d/b/a Trellis, is the managing organization for the Juniper initiative, expanding evidence-based health promotion (EBHP) classes throughout the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina (Edina Senior Center) shall participate in the Juniper initiative and provide a series of EBHP classes designed to help older adults maintain confidence about living independently and help them improve their overall health; and WHEREAS, Innovations for Aging, LLC d/b/a Trellis will pay the City of Edina the specified amount per participant/per session as outlined in Attachment B of the Contract for Services Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina agrees to enter into necessary and required agreement with Innovations for Aging, LLC d/b/a Trellis with the specific purpose of completing the continued Juniper initiative; and WHEREAS, a request for payment for the number of participants who have completed each program based on the funding criteria will be made to Innovations for Aging, LLC d/b/a Trellis by the City of Edina no later than 30 days after completion of each program; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Edina City Council approves and accepts the Innovations for Aging, LLC d/b/a Trellis grant agreement and associated grant funding. Dated: November 3, 2021 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk of the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of November 3, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting WINTNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 . City Clerk CONTRACT FOR SERVICES AGREEMENT Juniper® This contract agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into as of the date last signed below (“Effective Date”) between Innovations for Aging, LLC, d/b/a Trellis (“Trellis”) and Edina Senior Center (“Contractor”). WHEREAS Trellis is the managing organization for the Juniper initiative, expanding evidence- based health promotion (“EBHP”) classes throughout the state of Minnesota, and WHEREAS Trellis is leading a collaborative initiative, Juniper, to increase EBHP classes across Minnesota, primarily, but not exclusively for older adult participants. Trellis desires to enter into partnerships for the purchase of EBHP and evidence informed classes from qualified contractors across a defined set of thirteen (13) programs, which are outlined in Attachment A, Program Descriptions. Contractor is not required to provide all programs listed in Attachment A. These programs help older adults maintain confidence about living independently and help them improve their overall health. WHEREAS Contractor shall participate in the Juniper initiative and provide EBHP classes. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. Term of Contract The term of this Agreement will commence on January 1, 2022 and continue until December 31, 2022. 2. Providers Obligations and Deliverables 2.1 Maintain usual and customary insurance applicable to Contractor’s obligations under this Agreement, including Commercial General Liability Insurance covering products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury and workers compensation insurance that is in compliance with applicable statutory guidelines. 2.2 Provide a location/facility which meets applicable Minnesota and local building codes sufficient to conduct in-person EBHP classes. 2.3 Use a remote platform which meets applicable Minnesota Data Practices Act and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”) to conduct remote EBHP classes. 2.4 Contractor shall appoint an employee to serve as the primary point of contact with the Trellis in connection with this Agreement, and who shall be accountable for the Contractor deliverables as captured in Section 3 of this Agreement. This appointee will hold the title as Provider Contact for purposes of this Agreement and for purposes of the Provider Contact role in the yourjuniper.org database. 2.5 Follow all applicable state and federal laws including the Minnesota Data Practices Act and HIPAA to safeguard and otherwise protect identifying and protected health information (“PHI”) of class participants. Contractor agrees to execute and comply with the terms of the HIPAA Business Associate Agreement attached hereto as Attachment C and incorporated herein. 2.6 Contractor shall complete any training required and will follow necessary requirements to follow EBHP program fidelity. Contractor will engage in activities to learn about program fidelity. Contractor shall recruit speakers, or class leaders, for each of the classes offered by Contractor and speakers, or class leaders, shall maintain fidelity to the curriculum. 2.7 Contractor shall follow the Juniper leader application process and support class leaders for class delivery as indicated in the Juniper provider toolkit. This includes clear communication with the leader on the expectations and responsibilities for class delivery as it pertains to scheduling a class, data collection, finding a location, participant recruitment, identifying a co-leader (as applicable), fees for classes, and other support as needed. Contractor will inform class leaders of Juniper opportunities for class leaders to connect with and engage with other class leaders 2.8 Contractor shall make arrangements for class location, including in-person locations or remote locations; provide participant materials; and provide other supplies or items necessary to conduct the session. 2.8.1 For the Aging Mastery Program, Contractor shall order participant materials via the online form at www.yourjuniper.org at least 4 weeks in advance of the first-class session. 2.9 Contractor will assist and provide necessary information to Trellis for Trellis’s reimbursement from health plans and communicate the availability of the EBHP workshops to members of their community. 2.10 Give permission to Trellis to cite Contractor as a partner in the Juniper initiative, including on Trellis’s website, yourjuniper.org. 2.11 Include the logo for Juniper within the Juniper style guidelines, in all marketing materials and references to the classes. 2.12 Participate in class participant data collection and class participant consent requirements. 2.13 Register participants, leaders, and list all EBHP classes funded under this Agreement on the website, yourjuniper.org. 2.14 Ensure all available participants’ pre- and post- survey information is entered into the yourjuniper.org database that attended over one (1) session into yourjuniper.org. 2.15 Enter all scheduled classes into yourjuniper.org no later than sixty (60) days prior to the start of the class. 2.16 In the event of a class cancellation, Contractor will not cancel a class less than three (3) business days before the class session one (1) start date. 2.17 In the event of a class cancellation, Contractor will contact each registered participant by telephone and email, when email is available, indicating the class has been cancelled. Contractor will provide the registered participant alternative class registration information and refer the participant to the alternative class’s registration contact. 2.18 Contractor will schedule classes in a manner that aligns with EBHP program fidelity and successful participant completion. 2.19 Should a participant fall or otherwise be injured during class the Contractor will immediately report these safety incidents to their Juniper Provider Relationship Manager following the end of the class. 2.20 Contractor shall participate with Trellis and their designated Juniper Provider Relationship Manager to develop a sustainability plan for successful delivery of the Juniper Program(s). 2.21 Contractor shall have the recommended number of participants based on program license guidance with exceptions to be negotiated between Trellis and Contractor upon request. 2.22 Contractor shall ensure that participants complete registration forms, as well as pre- and post- class surveys to establish baselines, measure progress, collect demographic data, and support evaluation for evidence-based healthy aging programs. 2.23 Contractor shall enter and submit required information into yourjuniper.org noted below within fourteen (14) days of class completion. 2.23.1 Submit Participant Privacy Policy Acknowledgement form by uploading directly to Participant Details page on yourjuniper.org. 2.23.2 Submit Request for Payment by accessing the Juniper Provider Toolkit page, toolkits.yourjuniper.org, and select Juniper Classes, select the class you are requesting reimbursement for, and click on Payment Request Form. 2.24 Ensure the following available data is entered into the yourjuniper.org database: 2.24.1 Participant pre-survey data; 2.24.2 Participant post-survey data; 2.24.3 Participant Privacy Policy acknowledgement; and 2.24.4 Participant attendance data 2.25 Contractor shall complete the required HIPAA training provided by the Trellis, prior to the first class occurring, and annually thereafter. 3. Trellis’s Obligations and Deliverables 3.1 In consideration for the Services to be performed by Contractor, Trellis agrees to: 3.1.1 Make available to Contractor the ability to use the management information system yourjuniper.org (“Website”). For purposes of this section, management information system is defined as software designed to facilitate the storage, organization, and retrieval of information. 3.1.2 Manage Website and provide the following Website capabilities to Contractor: 3.1.2.1 Data capture and reporting; 3.1.2.2 Ability to track participant outcomes; 3.1.2.3 Filter classes by multiple filters including location of class, date(s), and funding source; 3.1.2.4 View list of all partnering organizations; 3.1.2.5 View list of classes leaders have led; 3.1.2.6 View and edit leaders associated with organization; 3.1.2.7 Add, view, and remove participants from a class; 3.1.2.8 Enter participant survey data and attendance; 3.1.2.9 Export participant roster data in single file format; and 3.1.2.10 Ability to publicize network events. 3.1.3 Provide marketing support; and 3.1.4 Provide Contractor the ability to be a part of a high-impact network with access to best practices and a broad community of learning. 3.2 In kind support, Trellis provides to the Contractor: 3.2.1 Wellness Engagement Center Support for assistance in registering class participants and providing user support; 3.2.2 Management Information System access with yourjuniper.org; 3.2.3 Access to the program license at no cost to the Contractor; 3.2.4 An online form to order Aging Mastery Program class materials; 3.2.5 Provider network membership where the Trellis negotiates for no cost on behalf of Contractor. 3.3 Trellis may make changes from time to time in the manner of performing the Services delineated in Subsections 3.1 and 3.2 of this Section and may suspend or terminate the provision of one or more of the Services delineated in Subsections 3.1 and 3.2 of this Section. 4. Payment 4.1 Payment for a session, as defined in Attachment B, will only be made to Contractor for a participant that provides a Minnesota residence address or for any participant who resides in a bordering Minnesota community that is no more than sixty (60) miles from the Minnesota border. 4.2 Request for payment is due no later than thirty (30) days after completion of the class. Payment will be mailed within fifteen (15) days after request is received for all undisputed amounts. 4.3 Subject to available resources, Contractor may request additional funding for sessions attended by participants of evidence-based programs. Funds must be requested prior to class implementation. Submit request for additional funding to Jen Rooney at jrooney@yourjuniper.org. 4.4 Contractor shall not charge a direct fee to a participant whose participation is covered by a Minnesota Senior Health Option (“MSHO”) health plan benefit. 4.5 For purposes of this section, a “MSHO health plan benefit” includes BlueCross and BlueShield of Minnesota’s Minnesota Senior Health Options SecureBlue, HealthPartners® Minnesota Senior Health options, UCare® Minnesota Senior Health Options, and IMCare Classic. 4.6 All services delivered by the Contractor under this Contract must be performed to the Trellis’s satisfaction and in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations including business registration requirements of the offices of the Secretary of State. The contractor will not receive payment for work found by the Trellis to be unsatisfactory or performed in violation of federal, state, or local law. 5. Relationship of Parties It is understood by the parties that Contractor is not an agent or employee of Trellis for any purpose whatsoever but is an independent Contractor. Nothing will authorize the Contractor to act as an agent or employee for Trellis or to conduct business in the name of or on the account of Trellis. 6. Indemnification 6.1 Each party will mutually indemnify and hold harmless each other, its officers, directors, agents and employees from and against all claims, demands, or causes of action arising out of or resulting from any breach of this Agreement by or tortious or unlawful acts of the other party and its officers, directors, agents, and employees in the performance of its duties pursuant to this Agreement. The party seeking indemnification must notify the other party immediately of any lawsuits, claims, or demands for which the party seeking indemnification is responsible and will give that other party the opportunity to arrange and direct the defense of the case and provide all necessary information and assistance for such defense. This provision will survive termination of this Agreement. 6.2 Each party agrees to indemnify and hold harmless each other, its officers, directors, agents and employees from any and all causes of action, claims, demands, losses, or costs of any nature whatever arising out of or in any way related to the delivery of the evidence-based programs offered by Contractor. 7. Confidentiality 7.1 As a result of this Agreement, the parties may have access to or become acquainted with confidential information relating to each other’s business operations. Both parties, on their own behalf and on behalf of their employees, acknowledge the importance to the other party of maintaining the confidentiality of such information and agree never to use or disclose such information except as necessary to carry out their obligations under this Agreement or the Minnesota Data Practices Act. 7.1.1 Government Data/Privacy. Agency agrees to abide by the applicable provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, HIPAA requirements, and all other applicable state or federal rules, regulations, or orders pertaining to data privacy or confidentiality. The Agency understands that all of the data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Agency or Contractor in performing those functions are subject to the requirements of Chapter 13, and the Agency must comply with those requirements as if it were a government entity. This does not create a duty on the part of the Agency to provide the public with access to public data if the public data is available from the Contractor, except as required by the terms of this Agreement. 7.2 Confidential information shall not include: (a) information generally known to the public; (b) information which becomes known to the public through no action of either Trellis or Contractor; or (c) information for which the disclosure has been consented to by each of the parties. 8. Termination 8.1 The Agreement may be cancelled by either party at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. 8.2 This Agreement may be terminated at anytime upon the mutual written agreement between the Parties. 8.3 If a class is cancelled, no payment will be made to the Contractor. 8.4 Trellis may terminate this Agreement for cause: (i) upon ten (10) days written notice to the other party of a material breach if such breach remains uncured at the expiration of such period, or (ii) if Contractor becomes the subject of a petition in bankruptcy or any other proceeding relating to insolvency, receivership, liquidation or assignment for the benefit of creditors. 9. Ownership of Ideas 9.1 The work relating to the Contractor’s activities for the Trellis pursuant to this Agreement, and all copyrights, trademarks, patents, and other Trellis proprietary rights in the work shall be owned exclusively by Trellis. 9.2 For purposes of this section, “work” includes creative writings, research data and reports, writings, sound recordings, pictorial reproductions, drawings, film and video recordings, and other graphical representations, software, source code, business methods, inventions, improvements, and discoveries, and works of any similar nature (whether or not eligible for copyright, trademark, patent or other proprietary rights). 10. Advertising and Public Relations Neither party shall otherwise use the name of the other party in any promotional or advertising materials unless review and approval of the intended material is first obtained from the party whose name is to be used. 11. No Inducement It is not the purpose of this Agreement or the intent of the parties to induce, encourage, or otherwise arrange for referrals. 12. Entire Agreement This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and there are no other promises or conditions in any other agreement whether written or oral. This Agreement supersedes any prior written or oral agreement between the parties. 13. Excluded Provider Contractor represents and warrants that it, and, to the best of its knowledge, its employees and subcontractors providing the EBHP classes, are not debarred, excluded, suspended or otherwise ineligible to participate in any state or federal health care program, nor have they been convicted of any health care related crime (an “Excluded Provider”). Contractor will promptly notify Trellis in writing if it becomes aware that it, or any of its employees or subcontractors providing the EBHP classes has become an Excluded Provider. Trellis may terminate this Agreement upon written notice to Contractor if Contractor or any of its employees or subcontractors providing EBHP classes become an Excluded Provider. 14. Severability If any provision of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and enforceable. If a court finds that any provision of this Agreement is invalid or unenforceable, but that by limiting such provision it would become valid and enforceable, then such provision shall be deemed to be written, construed and enforced as so limited. 15. Waiver of Contractual Right The failure of either party to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver or limitation of that party's rights to subsequently enforce and compel strict compliance with every provision of this Agreement. 16. Amendment This Agreement may be modified or amended if the amendment is made in writing and is signed by both parties. 17. Assignment 16.1 Neither party may: assign its rights; delegate its responsibilities, or subcontract under this agreement without written consent of the other party. 16.2 Trellis shall only make payments to Contractor, and not the subcontractor, if any. 18. Applicable Law This Agreement will be governed by laws of the state of Minnesota and any dispute about this Agreement shall be governed by Minnesota law and venued exclusively in the state or federal courts located in Hennepin County, Minnesota. 19. Binding Effect This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Trellis and its successors, and Contractor and its successors. 20. Notice Any notice required will be in writing and be delivered or sent to this address: If to the Contractor: Nicole Gorman Recreation Supervisor Edina Senior Center 5280 Grandview Square Edina, MN 55436 If to the Trellis: Mark Cullen Vice President of Strategy and Operations Innovations for Aging 1265 Grey Fox Road, Suite 2 Arden Hills, MN 55112 The undersigned agree to the terms of this agreement. Innovations for Aging, LLC, d/b/a Trellis Edina Senior Center Signature Signature Mark Cullen James B. Hovland Print Name Print Name Vice President Mayor Title Title Date Date Signature Signature Mark Cullen Scott Neal Print Name Print Name Vice President City Manager Title Title Date Date ATTACHMENT A Program Descriptions FALLS PREVENTION A Matter of Balance A Matter of Balance emphasizes practical strategies to reduce fear of falling and increase activity levels. Participants learn to view falls and fear of falling as controllable, set realistic goals to increase activity, change their environment to reduce fall risk factors, and exercise to increase strength and balance. Learn more at http://www.mainehealth.org/mob. Stepping On Stepping On offers people a way of reducing falls and at the same time increasing self confidence in situations where they are at risk of falling. It covers a range of issues, including falls and risk, strength and balance exercises, home hazards, safe footwear, vision and falls, safety in public places, community mobility, coping after a fall, and how to initiate a medication review. Learn more at http://www.steppingon.com/. All Falls Prevention classes can be offered in-person only. LIVING W ELL Aging Mastery Program This program is a series of classes designed to help adults age 50 and older to set goals, engage in beneficial daily practices, and seek peer support to make meaningful changes in their lives that cultivate health and longevity. Learn more at https://www.ncoa.org/healthy- aging/aging-mastery-program/ Living well with Chronic Conditions and Tomando Control de su Salud (Spanish version) This program is designed to help participants deal with chronic conditions. Topics include: techniques to deal with frustration, fatigue, pain and isolation, appropriate exercise for maintaining and improving strength, flexibility, and endurance, appropriate use of medications, communicating effectively with family, friends, and health professionals, nutrition, and how to evaluate new treatments. Learn more at https://www.selfmanagementresource.com/ Social Connect Social Connect is a facilitated, small group gathering that you join by video conferencing or phone. Participants do gentle movement, learn about ways to reduce stress and feel their best, and connect with peers. It meets for 45 minutes, twice a week for three weeks. The class combines gentle movement, relaxation techniques, and group interaction. Learn more at https://resources.yourjuniper.org/online-class-social-connect/ Powerful Tools for Caregivers Powerful Tools for Caregivers® helps family and friends caring for older adults with long-term health conditions. Participants develop skills and confidence to better care for themselves while caring for others. The weekly topics range from reducing your stress to communicating in challenging situation and mastering caregiving decisions. http://www.powerfultoolsforcaregivers.org. CHRONIC DISEASE MANA GEMENT Arthritis Foundation Exercise Program (AFEP) AFEP is a community-based recreational exercise program developed by the Arthritis Foundation. Trained AFEP instructors cover a variety of range-of-motion and endurance- building activities, relaxation techniques, and health education topics. The program's demonstrated benefits include improved functional ability, decreased depression, and increased confidence. Classes typically meet two or three times per week for an hour. To find out about availability in your area, locate your state arthritis program. Learn more at http://www.cdc.gov/arthritis/partners/funded-states.htm Living well with Diabetes and Programa de Manejo Personal de la Diabetes (Spanish Version) This program is designed for people with type 2 diabetes and how to live well. Topics include: techniques to deal with the symptoms of diabetes, fatigue, pain, hyper/hypoglycemia, stress, depression, anger, fear and frustration; appropriate exercise for maintaining and improving strength and endurance; healthy eating, appropriate use of medication; and working with health care providers. Learn more at https://www.selfmanagementresource.com/ Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) Diabetes Prevention Program is a collaborative, community-based, lifestyle change program designed for people with pre-diabetes. The topics include tips on eating healthier, reducing stress, and getting more physical activity to become a healthier you. Learn more at https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/prevention/index.html Living Well with Chronic Pain Living Well with Chronic Pain is designed for people who have a diagnosis of chronic pain and ideas for how to deal with their symptoms. Topics include: techniques to deal with frustration, fatigue, isolation, and poor sleep, appropriate exercise for maintaining and improving strength, appropriate use of medications, communicating effectively with family, friends, and health professionals, nutrition, pacing activity and rest, and how to evaluate new treatments. Learn more at https://www.selfmanagementresource.com/ All Living Well classes may be held via HIPAA secure telephonic platform. Program materials will be mailed to the participants. GETTING FIT Stay Active and Independent for Life (SAIL) SAIL is a strength, balance and fitness program for adults. This class is designed to reduce the risk of falling by teaching participants how to perform exercises that improve strength, balance and fitness. Learn more at http://1.usa.gov/1FOlLIJ. Tai Ji Quan: Moving for Better Balance This program aims to help older adults improve their balance and reduce the likelihood of falling. Participants learn balance skills, good body alignment, and coordinated Tai Ji movements. Learn more at http://tjqmbb.org/. Walk with Ease Walk with Ease is a program that is proven to reduce the pain of arthritis and improve overall health. This six-week program teaches participants how to safely make physical activity a part of their everyday lives. Included is a guidebook and a walking schedule to get participants safely moving toward better health. https://www.cdc.gov/arthritis/interventions/programs/wwe- individual.htm Additional evidence-based health promotion program course offerings may be added as mutually agreed upon by Trellis and Contractor. All Living Well classes may be held via HIPAA secure telephonic platform. Program materials will be mailed to the participants. ATTACHMENT B *Diabetes Prevention Program cannot be reimbursed with Health Plan MSHO funds in 2022 Program Total number of sessions Payment per Session A Matter of Balance 8 $15.62 Stay Active and Independent for Life (SAIL) 24 $5.20 Stepping On 7 $17.85 Tai Ji Quan: Moving for Better Balance 24 $5.20 Living Well with Chronic Conditions (English and Spanish) 6 $20.83 Arthritis Foundation Exercise Program 16 $7.81 Living Well with Chronic Pain 6 $20.83 Living Well with Diabetes (English and Spanish) 6 $20.83 Diabetes Prevention Program* 16 $7.81 Aging Mastery Program 10 $12.50 Walk With Ease 18 $6.94 Social Connect 6 $20.83 Powerful Tools for Caregivers 6 $20.83 Other evidence-based course offerings TBD TBD [Innovations for Aging d/b/a Trellis Provider Contract] page 13 ATTACHMENT C BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT This Business Associate Agreement (“BAA”) is by and between Edina Senior Center (“Business Associate”) and Innovations for Aging, LLC (“TRELLIS”) with Business Associate and TRELLIS, collectively, the “Parties,” in order to comply with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 and its related regulations (“HIPAA”), as modified by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical health Act (the “HITECH Act”). TRELLIS is a Business Associate for certain Minnesota Health Plan products offered by Minnesota Health Plans (“Covered Entity”), and TRELLIS subcontracts some of its performance obligations with such Health Plans on to Business Associate. TRELLIS and Business Associate have entered into a Services Agreement (“Underlying Agreement”) a portion of which relates to such subcontracted obligations. This BAA applies to the following services that Business Associate will perform for or on behalf of Covered Entity, and only to the extent that TRELLIS is acting as a Business Associate to a Health Plan (collectively deemed the “Underlying Services”): collection and transfer of PHI (as defined below) regarding the Health Plan members participating in Juniper program classes. I. Definitions a. Catch-all definition: Except as modified by this BAA, each capitalized term in this BAA has the meaning of that term as set forth in 45 C.F.R. Parts 160, 162 and 164. b. Specific definitions: i. HIPAA Rules. “HIPAA Rules” shall mean the Privacy, Security, Breach Notification, and Enforcement Rules at 45 CFR Part 160 and Part 164. ii. Electronic Protected Health Information or "EPHI". Electronic Protected Health Information or EPHI shall have the same meaning as the term "electronic protected health information" in 45 C.F.R. § 160.103, limited to information that Business Associate creates, accesses, receives, maintains or transmits on behalf of TRELLIS pursuant to the Underlying Agreements. iii. Event. Event means any Use or Disclosure of PHI (defined below) not provided for within this BAA or otherwise not permitted under HIPAA or other applicable federal or state laws, including, without limitation, a Breach of Unsecured PHI or a Security Incident. iv. Privacy Rule. Privacy Rule means the Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information, codified at 45 C.F.R. [Innovations for Aging d/b/a Trellis Provider Contract] page 14 parts 160 and 164, Subparts A and E, as currently in effect. v. Protected Health Information or “PHI”. Protected Health Information or PHI has the meaning set forth in 45 C.F.R. §160.103, but limited to information Used, Disclosed, received, created, maintained, or transmitted by Business Associate on behalf of TRELLIS pursuant to the Underlying Services. PHI Includes EPHI. For avoidance of doubt, the obligations under this BAA apply only to the PHI of Covered Entity members participating in Juniper classes offered by Business Associate. vi. Security Rule. Security Rule means the Standards for Security for the Protection of Electronic Protected Health Information, codified at 45 C.F.R. parts 160 and 164, Subpart C, as currently in effect. II. Obligations and Activities of Business Associate a. Acknowledgement of HIPAA Obligations. Business Associate acknowledges and agrees that it (i) is a "Business Associate" as defined by HIPAA and, (ii) as a Business Associate, has direct obligations under HIPAA with respect to its Use and Disclosure of PHI, in addition to those contractual obligations set forth in this BAA. b. Use and Disclosure of PHI. Business Associate shall not use or disclose PHI other than: as permitted or required by this BAA; as required to perform the Underlying Services; or as Required by Law. Business Associate shall not use or disclose PHI in any fashion that would constitute a violation of HIPAA if TRELLIS were to use or disclose the PHI in the same fashion. In using and disclosing PHI, Business Associate also shall comply with all federal and state laws that apply to the Use and Disclosure of PHI, including, without limitation, 42 CFR Part 2, governing confidentiality for people seeking treatment for substance abuse disorders from federally assisted programs and any applicable federal or state laws that are more restrictive than HIPAA. c. Privacy Rule Safeguards. To develop, implement, maintain and use administrative, technical and physical safeguards that are appropriate and sufficient to prevent Use or Disclosure of PHI other than as permitted or required by this BAA. d. Security Rule Compliance. Business Associate represents and warrants that it is, and for purposes of this BAA, shall be at all times, fully compliant with all aspects of the Security Rule and has fully implemented Administrative Safeguards, Technical Safeguards and Physical Safeguards that reasonably [Innovations for Aging d/b/a Trellis Provider Contract] page 15 and appropriately preserve the confidentiality, integrity and availability of EPHI, including, without limitation, maintaining documentation of a current and completed security risk assessment and written security policies and procedures. Business Associate also shall comply with any and all applicable state data security laws. e. Minimum Necessary. In requesting, using, and disclosing PHI to perform the Services or when doing so in accordance with the Privacy Rule for Business Associate's proper management and administration or to carry out its legal obligations, Business Associate shall comply with the minimum necessary requirements of the Privacy Rule. f. Sale of PHI. Business Associate shall not receive direct or indirect payment in exchange for any PHI. g. Marketing. Unless authorized by the Underlying Agreement in order to perform Services on behalf of TRELLIS, Business Associate shall not use or disclose PHI for any marketing purpose. h. De-Identifying. Use and disclosure of de-identified health information is permitted, but only if (i) the precise use is disclosed to TRELLIS and permitted by TRELLIS in its sole discretion and (ii) the de-identification is in compliance with 45 CFR §164.502(d), and any such de-identified health information meets the standard and implementation specifications for de- identification under 45 CFR §164.514(a) and (b). i. Required Disclosures. If Business Associate is confronted with legal action to disclose any PHI, Business Associate shall promptly notify TRELLIS and assist TRELLIS, as reasonably requested, in obtaining a protective order or other similar order, and shall thereafter disclose only the minimum amount of PHI that is required to be disclosed to comply with the legal action, whether or not a protective order or other similar order has been obtained. j. Other Permitted Disclosures. Business Associate may use or disclose PHI for the proper management and administration of Business Associate or to carry out the legal responsibilities of the Business Associate, provided the disclosures are Required by Law, or Business Associate obtains reasonable assurances from the person to whom the information is disclosed that the information will remain confidential and used or further disclosed only as required by law or for the purposes for which it was disclosed to the person, and the person notifies Business Associate of any instances of which it is aware in which the confidentiality of the information has been breached. [Innovations for Aging d/b/a Trellis Provider Contract] page 16 k. Agents and Subcontractors. Business Associate shall ensure that any and all of its agents and Subcontractors to whom it provides PHI in connection with the Underlying Services, or that create, access, receive, maintain or transmit PHI on behalf of Business Associate, agree, in writing, prior to the receipt of PHI, to the same restrictions and conditions that apply to Business Associate under this BAA and any additional restrictions or conditions necessary to permit Business Associate to comply with its obligations under this BAA, including, without limitation, its Event reporting obligations set forth in section III. Business Associate also shall ensure that all of its agents and Subcontractors to whom it provides PHI in connection with the Services, or that create, access, receive, maintain or transmit PHI on behalf of Business Associate, agree to comply with the terms of the audit and record keeping provisions set forth in this BAA. Business Associate shall maintain, and provide to TRELLIS upon request, a list of all agents or Subcontractors that access, create, receive, maintain or transmit PHI and a description of the PHI being accessed, created, received, maintained or transmitted by each such agent or Subcontractor. l. Audit. For purposes of determining Business Associate's, the Covered Entity’s, or TRELLIS’s compliance with HIPAA, upon request of TRELLIS or the Secretary of Health and Human Services, Business Associate shall: (i) make its HIPAA policies and procedures, related documentation, records maintained in accordance with this BAA, and any other relevant internal practices, books and records relating to the Use and Disclosure of PHI, available to the Secretary of Health and Human Services, to TRELLIS, or to Covered Entity and (ii) provide reasonable access to Business Associate's facilities, equipment, hardware and software used for the maintenance or processing of PHI. m. Record Keeping. Business Associate agrees to implement appropriate record keeping processes to enable it to comply, and to adequately evidence such compliance, with the requirements of this BAA, including, without limitation, the documentation required regarding agents and Subcontractors, documentation related to any Event, the written assurance of third parties with whom Business Associate discloses PHI for Business Associate's proper management and administration or as Required by Law. n. Training. Business Associate will ensure that members of Business Associate’s workforce will complete all HIPAA and compliance training required by TRELLIS. III. Event Reporting a. Unpermitted Use or Disclosure of PHI; Breach of Unsecured PHI. Except as provided in section III(b) below, Business Associate agrees to notify [Innovations for Aging d/b/a Trellis Provider Contract] page 17 TRELLIS of any Event of which it has reasonable suspicion of, or discovers, including any Breach of Unsecured PHI as required by 45 C.F.R. § 164.410. Business Associate shall furnish initial written notice to TRELLIS within two (2) business days from when the Business Associate has a reasonable suspicion of, or discovers, that an Event has occurred. This initial notice shall identify one contact person of Business Associate with whom TRELLIS may correspond regarding the Event. Within five (5) business days from the date of the aforementioned initial notice, Business Associate shall provide TRELLIS a written report containing a summary of the Event, which report shall include: a complete description of the Event, the date of the Event and the date of discovery; the names of the Individuals affected and any identifying account number, medical record number or date of birth; a description of the types of PHI involved in the Event; and a description of Business Associate's investigation and efforts to mitigate harm and protect against further Events. b. Special Reporting Requirements for Security Incidents. Business Associate agrees to provide notice to TRELLIS in the manner and within the timeframes set forth in section III(a) above of all Security Incidents that: [a] result in unauthorized access, Use, Disclosure, modification or destruction of EPHI or interference with system operations; or [b] do not result in unauthorized access, Use, Disclosure, modification or destruction of EPHI or interference with system operations ("Unsuccessful Security Incidents") but which Business Associate reasonably determines are of a type or pattern that warrant further action. c. Event Mitigation. Business Associate shall mitigate promptly, to the extent practicable, any harmful effect that is known to Business Associate of an Event. Business Associate shall document all mitigation efforts undertaken pursuant to this section. IV. Individual Rights a. Individual Right to Access. Within five (5) business days of receipt of TRELLIS’s notice to Business Associate of a request from an Individual to access his or her PHI, Business Associate shall make such PHI available directly to that Individual and provide to TRELLIS a written report detailing its handling of such request. If Business Associate receives an access request from an Individual, Business Associate shall, within two (2) business days, notify TRELLIS of the details of such request. Following receipt of such notice, TRELLIS shall handle the request, unless Business Associate maintains a designated record set, in which case, at the option and request of TRELLIS, Business Associate shall, within five (5) business days of TRELLIS’s request, make such PHI available directly to that Individual and provide to TRELLIS a written report detailing its handling of such request. [Innovations for Aging d/b/a Trellis Provider Contract] page 18 b. Individual Right to Amend. Within five (5) business days of receipt of TRELLIS’s notice to Business Associate of a request from an Individual to amend his or her PHI, Business Associate shall amend such PHI as directed by TRELLIS and provide to TRELLIS a written report detailing its handling of such request. If Business Associate receives an amendment request from an Individual, Business Associate shall, within two (2) business days, notify TRELLIS of the details of such request. Following receipt of such notice, TRELLIS shall handle such request, unless Business Associate maintains a designated record set, in which case, at the option and request of TRELLIS, Business Associate shall, within five (5) business days of TRELLIS’s request, amend such PHI as directed by TRELLIS and provide to TRELLIS a written report detailing its handling of such request. c. Individual Right to Request Accounting. Within five (5) business days of TRELLIS’s notice to Business Associate of a request from an Individual for an accounting of Disclosures of his or her PHI, Business Associate shall make available to TRELLIS such information as is in Business Associate's possession and is required for TRELLIS to make the accounting required by 45 C.F.R. § 164.528, which includes, at a minimum, the following information: i. The date of the Disclosure; ii. The name of the entity or person who received the PHI, and, if known, the address of such entity or person; iii. A brief description of the PHI disclosed; and iv. A brief statement of the purpose of such Disclosure that includes an explanation of the basis for such Disclosure. If Business Associate receives a request for an accounting from an Individual, Business Associate shall, within two (2) business days, notify TRELLIS the details of such request. Following receipt of such notice, TRELLIS shall handle such request, except that, at the option and request of TRELLIS, Business Associate shall, within five (5) business days of TRELLIS’s request, respond directly to the Individual for purposes of providing the accounting, as directed by TRELLIS, and provide to TRELLIS a written report of the details of its handling of such requests. To the extent that Business Associate maintains or operates an electronic health record system on behalf of TRELLIS, Business Associate also shall maintain information for the preceding three (3) year period (but no earlier than the applicable Effective Date) sufficient to enable TRELLIS to make an accounting of Disclosures for treatment, payment and health care operations. [Innovations for Aging d/b/a Trellis Provider Contract] page 19 V. TRELLIS Obligations a. Requests. TRELLIS Entity shall not request Business Associate to use or disclose PHI in any manner that would not be permissible under the Privacy Rule if used or disclosed by TRELLIS. b. Restrictions. TRELLIS shall notify Business Associate of any restriction in the Use or Disclosure of PHI to which TRELLIS has agreed, to the extent such restriction affects Business Associate's permitted Uses or Disclosures. VI. Term and Termination a. Term. The Term of this BAA shall be effective as of the same day as the Underlying Agreement and shall continue until the Underlying Agreement terminates, unless this BAA is terminated earlier as provided below. b. Termination for Cause. Business Associate authorizes termination of this BAA TRELLIS, if TRELLIS determines Business Associate has violated a material term of this BAA and Business Associate has not cured the breach or ended the violation for a period of (10) days after notice reasonably specifying the nature of the breach. c. Immediate Termination. In the event Business Associate has breached a material term of this BAA and the Parties agree that cure is not possible, TRELLIS may immediately terminate this BAA. TRELLIS may report such violation to the Secretary. d. Obligations of Business Associate Upon Termination. i. Upon termination of this BAA for any reason, Business Associate, with respect to PHI received from TRELLIS, or created, maintained, or received by Business Associate on behalf of TRELLIS, shall: 1. Return or destroy all PHI or de-identified PHI that the Business Associate still maintains in any form. 2. If in the event the parties mutually determine that returning or destroying the PHI or de-identified PHI is infeasible, Business Associate shall retain such PHI or de-identified PHI and extend the protections of this BAA to such PHI or de-identified PHI until such time that Business Associate returns or destroys it. e. Continuing Privacy and Security Obligation. Business Associate’s obligation to protect the privacy and safeguard the security of TRELLIS’s PHI as specified in this BAA will be continuous and survive termination or other conclusion of this BAA. [Innovations for Aging d/b/a Trellis Provider Contract] page 20 VII. Miscellaneous a. Regulatory References. A reference in this BAA to a section in the Privacy Rule or Security Rule means the section as in effect or as amended. b. Amendment. This BAA may not be amended except by the mutual written agreement of the Parties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parties agree to work together in good faith to take such action as is necessary to make technical amendments to this BAA from time to time if necessary for TRELLIS and/or Business Associates to comply with the requirements of HIPAA, the Privacy Rule and the Security Rule, or any applicable provisions of any other federal or state law, as such laws or regulations may be amended from time to time. However, should any state or federal law or regulation now existing or enacted after the Effective Date of this BAA, including without limitation HIPAA, the Privacy Rule and the Security Rule, be amended or interpreted by judicial decision or a regulatory body in such a manner that either Party reasonably determines renders any provision of this BAA in violation of such law or regulation or adversely affects the Parties’ abilities to perform their obligations under this BAA, the Parties agree to negotiate in good faith to amend this BAA so as to comply with such law or regulation and to preserve the viability of this BAA. If, after negotiating in good faith, the Parties are unable to reach agreement as to any necessary amendments, either Party may terminate this BAA without penalty. c. Survival. The respective rights and obligations of Business Associate under this Section shall survive the termination of this BAA. d. Interpretation. Any ambiguity in this BAA shall be resolved to permit TRELLIS to comply with the Privacy Rule. e. Conflicts. In the event of any conflict between the terms and conditions of this BAA and the Underlying Agreement, the terms and conditions of this BAA will override and control. f. Third Party Beneficiaries. Business Associate and TRELLIS agree that Individuals whose PHI is used or disclosed to Business Associates or its Subcontractors under this BAA are not third-party beneficiaries of this BAA or the Underlying Agreement. g. Correspondence. The Parties will send any reports or notices required under this BAA to the addresses set forth in the notice provision of the Underlying Agreement. [Innovations for Aging d/b/a Trellis Provider Contract] page 21 h. Indemnity. Business Associate shall indemnify and hold harmless TRELLIS and any affiliate, officer, trustee, director, employee or agent from and against any demand, claim, cause of action, liability, damage, fines, penalties, cost or expense, including attorneys’ fees and court or proceeding costs, arising out of or in connection with (i) Business Associate's breach of this BAA, including, without limitation, the failure of Business Associate to fulfill any of its obligations with respect to PHI under section II or (ii) any Use or Disclosure of PHI by Business Associate, its employees, agents, Subcontractors or independent contractors that is not permitted under this BAA or that otherwise violates HIPAA. Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.P. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve New Officer for Existing Liquor License for RH F & B Minnesota, LLC dba RH Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve new officer for existing liquor license for RH F & B Minnesota, LLC dba RH previously known as Restoration Hardware. INTRODUCTION: In addition to the new officer, RH F& B Minnesota, LLC dba Restoration Hardware has changed their dba/trade name to RH. The City will contact the State of Minnesota with the change. ATTACHMENTS: Description Police Dept. Background Investigation Report BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION SUMMARY LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION RH F & B Minnesota, LLC (dba: RH) Change of Officer The Edina Police Department has conducted a background investigation relating to a City of Edina application for a CHANGE OF OFFICER to an existing liquor license. The application was submitted by RH F & B Minnesota, LLC (dba: RH), which operates at 6801 France Avenue in Edina. This application is for the addition of an officer and no current officer is being replaced. Name of Officer: Eades, Casey William Yorba Linda, CA A background investigation has been completed. No criminal records which would negatively affect their license application were found. Checks were made with the following databases: Minnesota BCA California DMV Hennepin County Edina Police Department Minnesota Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division From the information gathered I have found nothing to preclude this change of officer. Arc October 8, 2021 Lt. Aaron White Edina Police Department Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.Q. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-104: Accepting Donations Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2021-104 accepting donations. INTRODUCTION: To comply with State Statute, all donations to the City must be accepted by resolution and approved by two- thirds majority of the Council. See attached resolution with list of donations. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-104: Accepting Donations RESOLUTION NO. 2021-104 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Parks & Recreation  Thomas Sullivan $3,200 Bench at Arden Park Dated: November 3, 2021 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 3, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _______ day of ___________________, 2021. City Clerk Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: VII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:East Grandview Transportation Study Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None; information only. INTRODUCTION: The East Grandview Transportation Study was recently completed as part of a condition associated with the development project at 4917 Eden Avenue. Attached is the final report along with BetterTogetherEdina feedback responses as of 6 a.m. on Thursday, October 28. Twelve feedback responses were submitted. Staff will present details of the final staff recommended concepts, stakeholder feedback, and next steps. ATTACHMENTS: Description BetterTogetherEdina Feedback Responses East Grandview Transportation Study Staff Presentation Survey Responses 29 September 2021 - 28 October 2021 Feedback Form Better Together Edina Project: East Grandview Transportation Study VISITORS 17 CONTRIBUTORS 13 RESPONSES 13 13 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous 13 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:CyndiO Email:cyndi.gustobt@gmail.com Responded At:Oct 21, 2021 07:42:11 am Last Seen:Oct 21, 2021 14:27:28 pm IP Address:75.73.52.38 Q1.Please provide your comments on the street improvement concepts on Eden Ave, Grange Rd, Wilson Rd, and 50th Street In the meantime, starting now, please police and ticket 50th street between HWY 100 and Wooddale, and add MPH limit signs. This can be done now, with little cost and just may make some money with ticket revenue. At the very least it will feel like you are listening to us. Respondent No:2 Login:Karine Watne Email:karine.watne@toro.com Responded At:Oct 21, 2021 11:23:46 am Last Seen:Oct 21, 2021 18:21:53 pm IP Address:170.92.1.251 Q1.Please provide your comments on the street improvement concepts on Eden Ave, Grange Rd, Wilson Rd, and 50th Street Please consider Pedestrians and Bike improvements first and easier access with actually usable sidewalk. The current sidewalks & safety in that area are really poor. Thank you for your efforts! Respondent No:3 Login:Sara McGrane Email:saramcgrane@hotmail.com Responded At:Oct 24, 2021 09:27:25 am Last Seen:Oct 24, 2021 16:27:07 pm IP Address:66.41.95.157 Q1.Please provide your comments on the street improvement concepts on Eden Ave, Grange Rd, Wilson Rd, and 50th Street I have lived in the Sunnyslope neighborhood for 13 years and this has been the only time I've reached out to the City on an issue. We appreciate the opportunity to speak, and the City's willingness to listen. While I appreciate the work that has done to date, I do not think the traffic issue is resolved completely or satisfactorily. It is hard for an experienced driver to get in and out of our neighborhood, let alone a new driver. Traffic on 50th moves rapidly, it is narrow, and there are often children riding bikes to school or people out walking. I was pleased to hear about the dedicated left turn from 50th going East turning into Dale Drive. But I hope you will also consider a dedicated left turn lane and turn signal from 50th going West onto Grange Road. As someone who exits Sunnyslope from Dale Drive, I am also concerned about removing the ability to turn left from Dale Drive. That will also increase drivers on East Sunnyslope turning left. Again, I thank you for listening, and hope that you will address these important issues before the completion of the Perkins project or the Vernon Avenue bridge project. Respondent No:4 Login:Ann Makredes Email:amakr@msn.com Responded At:Oct 24, 2021 11:35:38 am Last Seen:Oct 20, 2021 20:30:38 pm IP Address:75.72.144.184 Q1.Please provide your comments on the street improvement concepts on Eden Ave, Grange Rd, Wilson Rd, and 50th Street We would like to thank Chad Millner, Bill Neuendorf and Cary Teague for listening to our concerns. We have studied the Traffic report and TIF funding request in more detail and offer the following comments: We oppose the creation of the TIF district as a matter of principle. Thoughtful master planning is the only way to solve our interconnected regional traffic and safety concern not ad-hoc projects that are TIF funded and not interconnected or sequenced correctly. Tax Payers fund all the work of Government and TIF funding is still a Tax – just in a less direct way. Regardless of the funding mechanism, the traffic and safety issues still exist and we would like to provide our thoughts on the ideas proposed. As a neighborhood we met with Chad Millner, Bill Neuendorf and Cary Teague on Wednesday 10/20 and have a follow-up meeting on Monday 10/25. We are not convinced that the traffic and safety concerns on 50th can be mitigated by work conducted just in the proposed TIF district. At a minimum the work needs to extend to Wooddale. We do think that a low cost immediate solution would be to “narrow” the existing lanes with paint striping for a perceived narrowing and per Chad as a proven speed mitigation measure. The left turn pocket from 50th into dale also appears to be able to be completed with just paint (at least temporarily) We are concerned with the width of the new combined of dedicated Bike/Pedestrian path – it appears to take significant right way from residents and would only extend the length of the TIF district with an abrupt stop – essentially a bike path to nowhere. This could be more appropriately designed and directed into the Eden Ave side of City Hall. Avoiding 50th street there would make it safer for bikers. We are also concerned about the timings of all of these separate projects. The Vernon Ave Bridge replacement is scheduled for 2023 (a major disruption), the Perkins project we would anticipate to begin in 2022 and finish in 2023? Chad mention the improvement to 50th would then follow? After all the development? Turning back to the TIF district – the 3 reasons the developer is requesting TIF funds do not seem to add up to $5.1 million. The public art they are proposing is not a significant investment – may be $10,000. Per the City new Affordable Housing Policy – a project of this size and scale – affordable housing is required as the cost of doing business in Edina. That leaves the transfer of the right of way for a future highway 100 interchange. Only 1 of the 3 options presented in the traffic study requires the use of this land. So really hard to see that valued at $5.1 million. Please don’t give away our Tax dollars so easily to a private for profit business. We also would like to extend an invitation to walk our neighborhood and see first hand our thoughts, concerns and ideas. Mayor Hovland, please consider this as a welcome invitation for an upcoming “March with the Mayor”. We urge you to not consider the “do nothing” option – our neighborhood is isolated and extremely vulnerable to the increased development and traffic in this section of Edina. We look forward to working with you to find solutions. Thank you, Ann and Steve Makredes 4916 West Sunnyslope Road Respondent No:5 Login:DSF Email:david@friesnet.com Responded At:Oct 24, 2021 14:11:11 pm Last Seen:Oct 24, 2021 21:10:55 pm IP Address:205.164.230.2 Q1.Please provide your comments on the street improvement concepts on Eden Ave, Grange Rd, Wilson Rd, and 50th Street We are the the owners of a property located in the Sunnyslope Neighborhood in Edina proximate to the Perkins development site, and we applaud the City for listening to our concerns and coming up with some options for us to discuss. At this point, we are not convinced a "satisfactory plan for resolution of transportation system issues east of Highway 100 in the Grandview district by the City" has been presented. One of our main concerns is the speed of the traffic along 50th Street. While we like the dedicated left turn from 50th going east turning into Dale Drive and the dedicated left turn lane and turn signal from 50th going west onto Grange Road, we are very concerned about removing the ability to turn left from Dale Drive, to go East on 50th. We believe that all improvements should be completed prior to any certificates of occupancy being issues for the Perkins project or commencement of the Vernon Avenue bridge reconstruction. We recommend that the City immediately narrow the lanes (to slow traffic) starting at the Wooddale/50th intersection and extending all the way up to Grange Road and Hwy 100, and also add a white line adjacent to the curb (to increase pedestrian safety). Respondent No:6 Login:Dwight Email:dwightep@gmail.com Responded At:Oct 24, 2021 18:41:58 pm Last Seen:Oct 25, 2021 01:10:02 am IP Address:75.73.70.223 Q1.Please provide your comments on the street improvement concepts on Eden Ave, Grange Rd, Wilson Rd, and 50th Street I do appreciate your attention to the traffic issues the Sunnyslope neighborhood has presented, please fix the the problem ONCE the right way. I do like the idea of narrowing of 50th to slow traffic down. However without slowing the traffic from the Woodale/50th intersection seems to be a mistake and would reduce the effectiveness of the City efforts. Please solve these traffic issues before you add more development to our neighborhoods. Safety on 50th Street for pedestrians/bikers and cars should take precedence over any private development. Thanks for your consideration on this very serious matter. Dwight Bonewell Family Sunnyslope Resident Respondent No:7 Login:Janet Dietrich Email:jgrangaard@msn.com Responded At:Oct 24, 2021 18:44:59 pm Last Seen:Oct 25, 2021 01:26:37 am IP Address:75.73.175.244 Q1.Please provide your comments on the street improvement concepts on Eden Ave, Grange Rd, Wilson Rd, and 50th Street A comprehensive solution needs to start at Wooddale Avenue, not Eden Ave. That said, there are numerous actions that can and should be taken to improve conditions on the stretch of 50th St. from Wooddale Ave to Grange Road. First is to narrow the lanes with paint stripes. Mr. Milner, you've told us that this works to slow traffic. We believe you but would like to know by how much. It would be helpful to know what the results have been on other Edina streets where restriping has already occurred. It also appears that dedicated left turns could be created at Grange, Dale, and East Sunnyslope if the other lanes were narrowed. Finally, a solid white line a few feet away from the sidewalks on 50th would increase the safety buffer for pedestrians and bikers who use them. That larger buffer zone would also allow people leaving the Sunnyslope neighborhood via East Sunnyslope Road or Dale Drive to have more confidence and better sight lines. The roundabouts on Eden are a nice concept but not if the price paid is to create a TIF district. Eden carries far less traffic than 50th Street so the improvements should be concentrated on 50th. One benefit of implementing narrower lanes on 50th immediately is that it would allow for real-life improvement with no need for Right Of Way easements, while the City studies the impact and what future changes may need to be made. More costly and intrusive changes should be made from a plan for the whole stretch, not just a proposed TIF district. Otherwise it is just a piecemeal approach and not coordinated, interconnected planning. Respondent No:8 Login:Mark Sparano Email:msparano@gmail.com Responded At:Oct 24, 2021 19:53:51 pm Last Seen:Oct 23, 2021 18:38:14 pm IP Address:75.73.69.239 Q1.Please provide your comments on the street improvement concepts on Eden Ave, Grange Rd, Wilson Rd, and 50th Street Bike lanes should be removed. Even with improvements, volume of traffic and speed lends to high risk of car/biker accidents in my opinion. Other concepts are okay but please realize that the 73 homes in the Sunnyslope Neighborhood will still be hampered when turning left or right onto West 50th Street. I think the scope of improvements should extend to Wooddale Avenue and West 50th Street as the same issues/problems exist with those intersections [Wooddale, Browndale, Utley Park, etc.}. Respondent No:9 Login:R. Green Email:gogreener@gmail.com Responded At:Oct 25, 2021 13:37:49 pm Last Seen:Oct 25, 2021 20:26:40 pm IP Address:75.73.173.38 Q1.Please provide your comments on the street improvement concepts on Eden Ave, Grange Rd, Wilson Rd, and 50th Street I live on East Sunnyslope Road. I’m writing to share my feedback regarding the East Grandview Transportation Study and City’s contemplated improvements. Sunnyslope isn’t connected to East or West Edina at least as far as Pedestrian traffic is concerned and eliminating the left turn from Dale Drive further isolates the neighborhood and shifts the burden of the traffic problem on 50th onto the shoulders of Sunnyslope residents. Regarding Pedestrian Safety: There’s no safe path for pedestrians leaving Sunnyslope (East or West) on 50th and the proposed improvements do not prioritize pedestrian safety. Current state: a meager 8 inch curb separates 40mph traffic from children on the sidewalk. vegetation grows over much of the sidewalk along 50th Tree growth (overhanging 50th) precludes drivers from seeing the traffic light on 50th Our Lady of Grace is only 1,500 feet from Sunnyslope but kids need to cross 50th, Grange, Eden Ave, and a litany of access points (ingress & egress) to Hwy 100… I double-dog dare you to walk that stretch of the City with your kids before school starts. Proposed Improvements: -Should include pull all pedestrian safety elements from future phases into Phase 1 (including restriping 50th to narrow traffic lanes/slow traffic) and create a buffer between the sidewalks and the road. -should include removal or trimming of trees overhanging 50th to enable west-bount motorists on 50th to see the traffic signal before they reach/pass Dale. -Eliminates the left exit from Dale (onto 50th) – and shifts Sunnyslope traffic to East Sunnyslope … and will simply re-create the same problem at the intersection of 50th and East Sunnyslope. -should include a grass boulevard between 50th and the sidewalk (from Browndale to HWY 100). -should include a roundabout at Dale Drive & 50th to enable traffic movements in all directions… and prevent the same problem from shifting over to East Sunnyslope and 50th. -should contemplate adding a right in/out from West Sunnyslope directly onto 50th Respondent No:10 Login:cmclemency Email:katie.clemency@gmail.com Responded At:Oct 25, 2021 14:09:20 pm Last Seen:Oct 25, 2021 21:01:36 pm IP Address:68.46.65.132 Q1.Please provide your comments on the street improvement concepts on Eden Ave, Grange Rd, Wilson Rd, and 50th Street I believe these are not improvements and will only make these overly congested streets even more difficult and timely to navigate. Narrowing lanes to create more space for pedestrians and turn lanes will only add to the existing congestion; all this will worsen with the additional traffic from proposed new "luxury" apartments Respondent No:11 Login:Steve Makredes Email:steve.makredes@gmail.com Responded At:Oct 27, 2021 08:52:37 am Last Seen:Oct 27, 2021 15:50:45 pm IP Address:75.72.144.184 Q1.Please provide your comments on the street improvement concepts on Eden Ave, Grange Rd, Wilson Rd, and 50th Street Chad, Thank you again for meeting with the Sunnyslope neighborhood on Monday 10/25. As a follow up to our earlier note to you, we would like to reinforce the importance of a master schedule for all the road projects/improvements that are planned. We strongly recommend the following: • Restriping 50th from Wooddale Highway 100 – SPRING 2022 • Accelerate Mill and Overlay of 50th from Wooddale to Highway 100 from 2025 to 2022 - before the Vernon avenue Bridge project. • Complete Traffic and Safety improvements at Dale Drive and 50th in conjunction with the Mill and Overlay. • Complete the Improvements near 4917 Eden Ave around the completion of the development 2023? These major road projects will cause massive disruption – we fell it is best for traffic and safety that the 50th Street portion be completed first versus waiting until 2025 after the other projects are complete. Thank, you, Steve and Ann Makredes 4916 West Sunnyslope RD Respondent No:12 Login:Gloria Horns Email:hornsg@hotmail.com Responded At:Oct 27, 2021 18:04:24 pm Last Seen:Oct 27, 2021 23:32:40 pm IP Address:172.58.75.157 Q1.Please provide your comments on the street improvement concepts on Eden Ave, Grange Rd, Wilson Rd, and 50th Street Hello City As a 70 year resident of West Sunnyslope I’d like to register my opinions on the Eden Ave project and street improvement/traffic proposals. 1) TIF is definitely short changing the schools by lots of $$$! Hard to believe the School Board has not weighed in on this unless it has been purposefully obscured or there is something else going on. 2) Traffic proposal prohibiting left turn out of Dale is not safe. Requiring everyone exiting Dale who needs go east to exit Dale turning right on to 50th, then cross busy traffic lanes in a matter of a few yards to a left turn lane and to then make a U Turn (which is the proposed work around) is unsafe. 50th is a busy speedway and I don’t think starting in the right lane and trying to cross a lane of through traffic to get to a left turn lane in that short stretch is feasible. *Please keep in mind that the Dale Drive exit onto 50th St serves 50 homes (I counted!) in the Sunnyslope neighborhood. This counts West Sunnyslope, Dale Dr., Woodhill Way and Hilltop. I did not include East Sunnyslope. BETTER OPTION: 1). PROHIBIT LEFT TURN FOR WEST BOUND TRAFFIC ON 50th TURNING INTO CITY HALL PARKING LOT. Turning left there into City Hall is a dangerous turn across two lanes of fast moving east bound 50th traffic. Instead: 2) REPLACE THE PROPOSED LEFT TURN POCKET LANE TURNING INTO CITY HALL WITH A LEFT TURN POCKET LANE FOR EXIT FROM DALE DR MERGING ONTO EASTBOUND 50th. ANOTHER OPTION: CLOSE CITY HALL ENTRANCE OFF 50TH ST ALTOGETHER! That current entrance is too dangerous for turns off 50th into City Hall lot from either direction. I’ve seen a number of rear end accidents involving cars turning from both directions off 50th into City Hall lot (especially in winter!!). Auto access to City Hall should only be from Eden Ave. That would be much safer!! May need third mini traffic circle on Eden for the City Hall entrance but that would be a good opportunity to have an art installation in the median of the circle. Would make a very nice main entrance. BUILD A SOLID WALL ON SOUTH SIDE IF 50TH Instead of a 50th St access to City Hall I propose building a solid three to four foot decorative stone wall (similar to the one on east side of Grange) along the south side of 50th from Grange to Eden. This would allow for more room for widening 50th on the south side at a later date if needed for future projects (rather than widening on north side of 50th). The City could install decorative frescos along that wall portraying the history of the area. Would be a very nice addition to beautify City Hall! Thank you very much for considering my ideas. Gloria Horns 4905 W. Sunnyslope Rd. Sent from my iPhone Respondent No:13 Login:Paul Porter Email:pporter@umn.edu Responded At:Oct 28, 2021 07:23:22 am Last Seen:Oct 28, 2021 14:21:02 pm IP Address:75.73.64.44 Q1.Please provide your comments on the street improvement concepts on Eden Ave, Grange Rd, Wilson Rd, and 50th Street Thank you for your patience when meeting with the public. We (I) have much to learn as we are typically starting from a perspective that is uninformed and bias. Below are my thoughts about traffic around the Sunnyslope neighborhood: - Traffic on 50th Street between Wooddale and Hwy100 goes too fast, putting pedestrian and cyclists at a high risk of injury. You have indicated a narrowing of the lanes could slow traffic to some degree. You have indicated you will look into re-striping the lanes and adding a solid curb line as early as next spring. A curb line two to three feet from the curb gives cyclists the semblance of added security and helps protect sidewalk pedestrians who may inadvertently step off the curb. - I disagree with some comments made that cyclists should be encouraged to use Eden Avenue instead of 50th Street. The problem with this concept is that westbound cyclists would have to cross 50th Street to get onto Eden Avenue and cross 50th Street again at the western end of Eden Avenue to continue their ride west. - I see pedestrians and young cyclists trying to walk or ride between 50th Street and Eden Avenue along Grange Rd. There is no sidewalk. It is an unsafe situation. The East Grandview Area Transportation Study only considered a sidewalk along the west side of Grange Rd. This has flaws in that there is a lot of traffic exiting and entering Hwy100 that would cross the sidewalk. A better alternative would be to have the sidewalk on the east side of Hwy100. I was surprised this was not considered, and I wonder if city staff had influence on this because they didn’t want the City Hall parking lot to lose parking space. - A sidewalk along Grange Rd should be completed prior to when residents of the 7-story apartment complex move into their apartments. This would connect the residents by sidewalk to the bus stops on 50th Street. Although bus ridership is currently very low, hopefully this situation will change dramatically over the next 20 years. - Better signage for eastbound traffic along 50th Street is needed for drivers wanting to go north on Hwy100. We see many drivers every day turn around in our driveways on Dale Drive because they missed the northbound entrance to Hwy100. A sign indicating northbound Hwy100 drivers should be in the right lane may help this situation. - Thanks for assisting with the funding for a sound wall along the east side of Hwy100. I would be surprised if the 12 properties impacted don’t all favor its construction. - Thanks for trying to deal with traffic flow at the Dale Drive – 50th Street intersection. Dedicated turn lanes are an improvement. It will be interesting to learn more concrete details of how proposed changes will impact rights-of-way for adjacent landowners and City Hall property. I encourage you to push for a speedy reconstruction of the Hwy100 and 50th Street / Eden Avenue intersections, with improvements for pedestrians and cyclists. The various proposed designs are ingenious. I only wish they had been proposed earlier so that the Perkins site would not have gone through the height variance process and use of TIF funding. It is a stretch to call the Perkins site and Tupa Park a blighted area. How can Edina road infrastructure be improved without the needing TIF dollars? Is there a better funding method you would like citizens to advocate for? - It would make for a much more pleasant walk if the sidewalk along Wilson Road was moved to the east side instead of the west side of the road, and if trees or shrubs could be planted between Wilson Road and Hwy 100. Wishful thinking, eh? Thanks for listening. Grandview East Area Transportation Study EDINA 161189 Edina, MN | September 22, 2021 SEH is a registered trademark of Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. EDINA 161189 i Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................ 1 2 Existing Conditions ..................................................... 3 2.1 Crash History .......................................................................................... 6 2.2 Vehicle Volumes ..................................................................................... 7 3 Future Conditions ........................................................ 8 3.1 Traffic Forecasts ..................................................................................... 8 3.2 Planned Developments .......................................................................... 8 3.3 Planned Roadway Improvements ........................................................... 8 4 Alternative Development ........................................... 11 4.1 Traffic Control Warrants ....................................................................... 11 4.2 Alternative Safety Considerations ......................................................... 12 4.3 Alternative Scenarios ............................................................................ 15 5 Design Concepts and Traffic Operations .................. 16 5.1 Eden Avenue Alternatives .................................................................... 17 5.2 W. 50th Street Alternatives .................................................................... 25 5.3 TH 100 Interchange Alternatives .......................................................... 34 5.4 Grange Road Alternatives .................................................................... 44 5.5 TH 100 Pedestrian Bridge .................................................................... 48 6 Other Public Improvements ...................................... 50 7 Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Funding ................... 51 8 Conclusion ................................................................ 52 Contents (continued) EDINA 161189 ii List of Tables Table 1 – Crash History 2015-2019 ........................................................................... 6 Table 2 – Existing Warrant Analysis Results ............................................................ 12 Table 3 – Level of Service Thresholds ..................................................................... 16 Table 4 – 2024 Eden Avenue Operations Comparison ............................................ 23 Table 5 – 2040 Eden Avenue Operations Comparison ............................................ 24 Table 6 – 2024 50th Street Operations Comparison ................................................. 30 Table 7 – 2040 50th Street Operations Comparison ................................................. 31 Table 8 – 50th Street Build Alternatives Comparison ................................................ 32 Table 9 – 50th Street at Eden Avenue Intersection Comparison ............................... 33 Table 10 – 2040 Interchange Operations – No Build ............................................... 41 Table 11 – 2040 Interchange Operations – Offset Split SPUI .................................. 41 Table 12 – 2040 Interchange Operations – Split Diamond ....................................... 42 Table 13 – 2040 Interchange Operations – DDI (HCS Analysis) .............................. 42 Table 14 – TH 100 Interchange Comparison ........................................................... 43 Table 15 – Grange Road Alternatives Comparison .................................................. 48 List of Figures Project Location ........................................................................................ 2 Existing Conditions .................................................................................... 5 Vernon Avenue Reconstruction (2024) ..................................................... 9 Eden Avenue Reconstruction (2022) ...................................................... 10 Safety – Conflict Point Diagrams ............................................................. 14 Eden Avenue – No Build Conditions ....................................................... 18 Eden Avenue – Build Two Mini Roundabouts ......................................... 19 Eden Avenue – Build “Dog Bone” Mini Roundabout ............................... 20 Eden Avenue – Corridor Improvements .................................................. 22 W. 50th Street – No Build Conditions ..................................................... 25 W. 50th Street – Safety Improvement Alternative .................................. 27 W. 50th Street – Buffered Bike Lanes Alternative .................................. 28 W. 50th Street – 2016 Grandview Study Section ................................... 29 TH 100 Interchange – No Build ............................................................. 34 TH 100 – Split Offset SPUI .................................................................... 36 TH 100 – Split Diamond ........................................................................ 38 TH 100 – Diverging Diamond ................................................................ 40 50th Street – Grange Road No Build Conditions .................................... 44 50th Street – Grange Road Realignment ............................................... 45 Contents (continued) EDINA 161189 iii 50th Street – Grange Road Realignment ............................................... 46 TH 100 Pedestrian Bridge – Short Span ............................................... 49 List of Appendices Appendix A Intersection and Volume Figures Appendix B Traffic Operational Results Appendix C Design Layouts EDINA 161189 Page 1 Grandview East Area Transportation Study Prepared for the City of Edina. 1 Introduction The interchange area of Trunk Highway (TH) 100 at Vernon Avenue and West 50th Street includes a complex roadway network with a non-traditional interchange type and many local road connections. With redevelopment occurring within and adjacent to the study area, there is desire from the City to improve safety for all modes, traffic operations, access and reduce the complexity of the existing roadway network within the Grandview District area. The study area includes Vernon Avenue to the north and west, and Eden Avenue to the south and east; however, the focus area is just west of TH 100 to Eden Avenue, including the freeway ramp connections. Tax Increment Financing (TIF) funds are being considered for near term transportation improvements adjacent to upcoming redevelopment opportunities within the project area. Figure 1 represents the entire project area and the focus area in Grandview District. 1.1 Background The project area has been studied several times in recent years. Some of the analysis was conducted to develop Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) for specific redevelopment parcels, while other studies included local roadway and intersection improvements and high-level planning concepts. At the time of this study, the following studies and information was used by either incorporating the data or using the study as a reference.  Eden Avenue Traffic Study (2020)  Grandview Green Transportation Study (2018)  Grandview District Transportation Study (2016)  Grandview District Development Framework (2012)  Traffic Impact Studies (various locations)  Traffic and Parking Study for 4917 Eden Avenue (2021)  Our Lady of Grace Expansion TIS (2019)  Planned development at 5100 Eden Avenue (no current TIS)  Planned development at 5146 Eden Avenue (no current TIS) More details about these studies will be provided in a later section of this report. EDINA 161189 Page 2 Project Location EDINA 161189 Page 3 2 Existing Conditions The following is a description of each of the major roadways and intersections within the project area. Highway 100 TH 100 is a north-south freeway facility that extends over 15-miles through the western side of the metro area. Through the interchange, TH 100 has 3-travel lanes in each direction, with a posted speed limit of 60 miles per hour (MPH) and carries approximately 124,000 vehicles per day.  Northbound TH 100 has a single low speed (20 MPH) exit ramp that connects to Grange Road. There are two entrance ramps from W. 50th Street to northbound TH 100 with an eastbound loop ramp and a westbound right turn.  Southbound TH 100 has a single lane exit to access Vernon Avenue to the west and 50th Street to the east, a connection to a collector-distributer (CD) roadway system also allows access to Arcadia Avenue. There is a single entrance ramp connection to southbound TH 100 that is part of the CD roadway with access from both Vernon Avenue and Eden Avenue. Vernon Avenue S Vernon Avenue S is a west-east A-Minor Arterial roadway designated as a County State Aid Highway 158 (CSAH 158) for Hennepin County. It is a 4-lane divided roadway that serves as a primary regional corridor, connecting drivers to TH 62, TH 100, residential areas, and commercial areas such as the Grandview District. The posted speed limit is 30 MPH. Sidewalk facilities exist primarily on the north side of Vernon Avenue S within the focus area. Vernon Avenue S transitions into W 50th Street on the east side of TH 100. Access to both directions of TH 100 is provided from Vernon Avenue. In the study area, the corridor carries between 12,400 to 19,000 vehicles per day based on the most recent daily traffic numbers. W 50th Street W 50th Street and Vernon Avenue S are a common roadway, with Vernon Avenue S designated to the west of TH 100 and W 50th Street designated to the east of TH 100. Like Vernon Avenue S, W 50th Street is also a west-east A-Minor Arterial roadway within the study area. It is a 4-lane roadway that also serves as a regional corridor in the City. The posted speed limit is 30 MPH. Near the TH 100 overpass, sidewalk facilities exist only on the north side of the roadway. Sidewalk facilities are provided on both sides of the roadway east of Grange Road. In the study area, the corridor carries between 19,000 to 27,000 vehicles per day based on the most recent daily traffic numbers. Eden Avenue Eden Avenue is a west-east Minor Collector roadway designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) Route for the City of Edina. It is a 3-lane undivided roadway that connects between Vernon Avenue to the west and W 50th Street to the east with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour (MPH). Sidewalk facilities exist on both sides of the roadway except a short segment with sidewalk only on the south side between Brookside Avenue and Arcadia Ave/Normandale Rd; this missing segment will be constructed with a planned 2021 project. Access to southbound TH EDINA 161189 Page 4 100 is provided from Eden Avenue. In the study area, the corridor carries between 3,600 to 5,200 vehicles per day based on the most recent daily traffic numbers. Arcadia Avenue and Normandale Road Arcadia Avenue and Normandale Road are two local minor collector roadways included in the study area; both facilities are 2-lane undivided roadways with speed limits of 30 MPH. Arcadia Avenue connects between Vernon Avenue and Eden Avenue, while Normandale Road extends to the south as a western freeway frontage road. Due to the proximity to the Our Lady of Grace Catholic School (OLG), Normandale Road is also within a 20 MPH school speed zone. Arcadia Avenue carries approximately 1,100 vehicles per day and Normandale Road carries approximately 2,100 vehicles per day based on the most recent daily traffic numbers. Grange Road and Willson Road Grange Road and Willson Road are two local minor collector roadways included in the study area; both facilities are 2-lane undivided roadways with speed limits of 30 MPH. Grange Road connects between W 50th Street and Eden Avenue, while Willson Road extends to the south as an eastern freeway frontage road. Willson Road is designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) Route for the City of Edina and carries approximately 4,400 vehicles per day. Grange Road carries between 6,000 and 8,000 vehicles per day based on the most recent daily traffic numbers. The following is a comprehensive list of all seventeen (17) intersections included in the analysis; the main study intersections are also noted. Vernon Avenue at Eden Avenue (Traffic Signal) Vernon Avenue at Gus Young Lane/Retail (Minor Stop Control) Vernon Avenue at Interlachen Boulevard (Traffic Signal) Vernon Avenue at Arcadia Avenue (eastbound RI/RO(2)) Vernon Avenue at TH 100 SB Ramp (1) (Traffic Signal) Vernon Avenue at TH 100 NB Ramp (1) (free right turn movements) W 50th Street at Grange Road (1) (Traffic Signal) W 50th Street at Dale Drive/City Hall Access (1) (Minor Stop Control) W 50th Street at Eden Avenue (1) (Minor Stop Control) W 50th Street at Sunnyslope Road (1) (Minor Stop Control) Eden Avenue at School/Church Access (Minor Stop Control) Eden Avenue at Arcadia Avenue/Normandale Road (All Way Stop Control) Eden Avenue at TH 100 SB Ramp (No Control) Eden Avenue at Grange Road/Willson Road (1) (All Way Stop Control) Eden Avenue at City Hall Access (1) (Minor Stop Control) Arcadia Avenue at TH 100 SB Ramp connection (Minor Stop Control) Grange Road at TH 100 NB Ramp (1) (Minor Stop Control) Notes: (1) Main Study Intersections. (2) Right-In/Right-Out Intersection EDINA 161189 Page 5 Figure 2 summarizes the existing and planned 2024 traffic control at the entire study area intersections. Additional intersection figures can be found in Appendix A. The 2024 planned traffic control and access changes will be further discussed in Section 3.3 of this report. The Vernon Avenue Bridge Reconstruction project will remove the high speed right turn movement from southbound TH 100 exit ramp and reconfigure the approach to a standard right turn movement. The Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue intersection project will construct a roundabout at the intersection and remove the entrance to southbound TH 100 from Eden Avenue. Existing Conditions EDINA 161189 Page 6 2.1 Crash History Crash data from January 1st, 2015 through December 31st, 2019 was provided from the MnDOT Crash Mapping Analysis Tool (MnCMAT2). The type and severity of the crashes were reviewed, and crash rates and critical rates were calculated for the study intersection. The crash rate at each intersection is expressed as the number of crashes per million entering vehicles (MEV). The critical crash rate is a statistical value that is unique to each intersection and is based on vehicular exposure and the statewide average crash rate for similar intersections. An intersection with a crash rate higher than the critical rate can indicate a safety concern at the intersection and the site should be reviewed. Crash severity is separated into five categories based on injuries sustained during the crash.  Fatal – Crash that results in a death  Severity A – Crash that results in an incapacitating injury or serious injury  Severity B – Crash that results in a non-incapacitating injury or minor injury  Severity C – Crash that results in possible injury  Property Damage – Crash that results in property damage only, with no injuries The crash information is summarized in Table 1. There was a total of 36 crashes that occurred in the 5-year timeframe at the 17 study intersections; none of the study intersection are approaching the critical crash rate. Not exceeding the critical rate indicates there has been no existing major safety problems, though it doesn’t alleviate all safety concerns. The southbound TH 100 ramp has the highest intersection crash frequency with 9 crashes in the 5-years, 6 of the crashes involved at least one a southbound ramp vehicle. Seven of the study intersections had no crashes during the analysis period; the table only includes the 10 intersections that had a crash occur at the intersection. Table 1 – Crash History 2015-2019 Intersection: Crash Severity Crash Rates Fatal Sev A Sev B Sev C Property Damage Total Int. Rate Critical Vernon Ave at Eden Ave** 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.08 0.91 Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd** 0 0 0 1 5 6 0.25 0.91 Vernon Ave at Arcadia Ave 0 0 0 0 2 2 0.06 0.38 Vernon Ave at TH 100 SB Ramps** 0 0 0 1 8 9 0.19 1.02 W 50th St at Grange Rd** 0 0 0 1 4 5 0.10 1.01 W 50th St at Dale Dr 0 0 0 1 2 3 0.07 0.37 W 50th St at Eden Ave 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.02 0.36 Grange Rd at TH 100 NB Ramps 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.04 0.42 Eden Ave at Grange Rd 0 0 1 1 1 3 0.13 0.43 Eden Ave at Arcadia Ave 0 0 1 1 2 4 0.23 0.48 TOTAL 0 0 3 6 27 36 Notes: **Signalized Intersection EDINA 161189 Page 7 2.2 Vehicle Volumes To perform the operational analyses, the City provided vehicle turning movement data from recently completed studies within the study area in addition to MnDOT count data and MnDOT ramp detector volume data. No new traffic data or observations were performed as part of this study. The Eden Avenue Traffic Analysis project’s existing volume data was utilized for most study intersections. However, additional count data from 2021 was incorporated to include some additional turning movement data at some intersections east of TH 100. Additional MnDOT detector data from the fall of 2019 was incorporated into the volumes from the previous studies. Overall, the most recently collected turning movement data (2019) was used, when possible, as well as the ramp detector data at the study intersections. This ensured that recent development traffic, such as the Avidor apartment complex, is included as much as possible in the analysis. Earlier turning movement count data was used, when necessary, for balancing purposes. With the study area having been thoroughly reviewed in recent years, an existing conditions analysis was not conducted. The existing volumes were forecasted to a year of opening 2024, which will be discussed in the next section. EDINA 161189 Page 8 3 Future Conditions Based on input from City staff and planned construction within the project area in the coming years, a 2024 year of opening analysis and a design year 2040 were developed. Intersection volume figures can be found in Appendix A. 3.1 Traffic Forecasts Future traffic forecasts were developed based on the City of Edina’s Comprehensive Plan and previous studies in the project area. Most roadways within the project area have a growth rate of between 0.2% and 0.5%. Based on the low growth rate and previous projects, including the Eden Avenue Traffic Study, a growth rate of 0.3% per year was applied to all intersections in the study area. 3.2 Planned Developments While some development has occurred in recent years, there are additional development areas within the project area that were incorporated into this study. The existing parcel at 4917 Eden Avenue is expected to be redeveloped into an apartment complex with 208 dwelling units and includes a small restaurant. A recent TIS was completed for the redevelopment and the traffic information from the study was incorporated into the volumes for this study. The existing parcels at 5100 Eden Avenue (Eden 100 Building) and 5146 Eden Avenue (old City Public Works site) have the potential to be redeveloped into residential properties; however, neither of these locations have a current TIS completed.  The 5100 Eden Avenue could occupy 100 apartment units per acre; with 1.38 acres, the density would be 138 residential apartments.  The 5146 Eden Avenue could occupy 50 apartment units per acre; with 3.30 acres, the density would be 165 residential apartments. Trip generation traffic was added to the forecasted background traffic volumes for both the 2024 and 2040 forecast years. 3.3 Planned Roadway Improvements Prior to the 2024 forecast year, two construction projects are planned to be completed and are incorporated into the analysis. The following is a brief description of each project. 3.3.1 Vernon Avenue Bridge Reconstruction Hennepin County is currently in the design phase to reconstruct the Vernon Avenue (CSAH 158) bridge over the Canadian Pacific Railroad. The project includes intersection improvements and modifications to the three adjacent intersections of Interlachen Boulevard, Arcadia Avenue, and the TH 100 Southbound ramp terminal. The project is anticipated to begin construction in 2023 and be completed in 2024. More information can be found on the County’s website (https://www.hennepin.us/vernon-avenue). EDINA 161189 Page 9 The following improvements are included in the project area:  Pedestrian Improvements throughout the project area, including:  Widening sidewalks on railroad bridge.  ADA pedestrian ramps at all crossings and new sidewalk connections.  Improved crossings at both Arcadia Avenue and the TH 100 SB Ramp.  Interlachen Boulevard Intersection:  Adding a westbound left turn lane and signal phase. Currently this movement is not allowed, however many people disregard the signage and create a queue in the through lane.  TH 100 SB Ramp Terminal Intersection:  Remove southbound free right turn movement and realign to the traffic signal. Figure 3 is from the Hennepin County website and shows the reconstruction area. Vernon Avenue Reconstruction (2024) EDINA 161189 Page 10 3.3.2 Eden Avenue at Arcadia Avenue Intersection Improvements The Eden Avenue Traffic Study, completed in 2020 for the City, included the recommendations for improvements along Eden Avenue at both Arcadia Avenue and the TH 100 Southbound ramp terminal intersections. The analysis showed the current Eden Avenue entrance ramp to southbound TH 100 could be removed without significant impacts to the roadway network. Rerouted traffic to the Vernon Avenue ramp intersection added delays but did not create a considerable impact. The ramp removal reduces the volumes along Eden Avenue and reduces access. The current intersection of Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue is under all-way stop sign control. While the intersection operates acceptably, the large size of the intersection can create driver confusion at the all-way stop approaches with knowing who has the right of way. The study recommended changing the intersection control to a mini roundabout to improve safety and operations. The construction of the roundabout is anticipated in 2022. The southbound TH 100 entrance ramp was initially planned to be removed with this project. However, the Vernon Avenue bridge reconstruction will utilize the southbound TH 100 entrance ramp as part of the detour route during construction. The southbound TH 100 entrance ramp will be permanently removed in 2024. Figure 4 shows the planned intersection improvements. Eden Avenue Reconstruction (2022) EDINA 161189 Page 11 4 Alternative Development For this study, various control types and roadway network reconfigurations are being explored. The main objectives of the analysis are to improve intersection safety, traffic operations, simplify the roadway network, and, if possible, create more developable land area. 4.1 Traffic Control Warrants To change an intersection traffic control, volume warrants are typically used to determine if a traffic signal, all-way stop, or roundabout control are justified at an intersection. The Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MnMUTCD) provides guidance on when it may be appropriate to use all-way stop or signal control at an intersection. This guidance is provided in the form of “warrants”, or criteria, and engineering analysis of the intersection’s design factors to determine when all-way stop or signal control may be justified. All-way stop or signal control should not be installed at an intersection unless a MnMUTCD warrant is met. Meeting a warrant at an intersection does not in itself require the installation of a particular control type. The specific control type also requires an engineering analysis of the intersection’s design for it to be justified. Roundabouts are considered to be warranted if traffic volumes meet the criteria for either all-way stop or traffic signal control. This study did not evaluate all intersections for potential traffic control changes; however, a few of the study intersections were reviewed with the volume data available. The four existing traffic signals in the study area are all expected to remain warranted and were therefore not evaluated. Many of the existing intersections have minor street volumes that are not close to any warrant threshold. Not including the four existing traffic signals, only four of the study intersections were evaluated for traffic control warrants; the four evaluated intersections are as follows: W 50th Street at Eden Avenue Evaluated High minor street volumes Eden Avenue at Arcadia Ave/Normandale Rd Evaluated High minor street volumes Eden Avenue at Grange Rd/Willson Rd Evaluated High minor street volumes Grange Road at TH 100 NB Ramp Evaluated High minor street volumes The following is a list of intersection that were not evaluated for traffic control warrants: Vernon Avenue at Gus Young/Retail Not Evaluated Low minor street volume Vernon Avenue at Arcadia Avenue Not Evaluated Limited Access Vernon Avenue at TH 100 NB Ramp Not Evaluated No Minor Street approaches W 50th Street at Dale Dr/City Hall Access Not Evaluated Low minor street volume W 50th Street at Sunnyslope Road Not Evaluated Low minor street volume Eden Avenue at School/Church Access Not Evaluated Low minor street volume Eden Avenue at TH 100 SB Ramp Not Evaluated Intersection Removed Eden Avenue at City Hall Access Not Evaluated Low minor street volume Arcadia Avenue at TH 100 SB Ramp Not Evaluated Low minor street volume The following Table 2 shows the results of the 2040 forecast traffic control warrant analysis. Each warrant has different hour requirements to meet the thresholds; however, it should be noted that an intersection may have additional hours above the minimum criteria. For example, an EDINA 161189 Page 12 intersection may meet the all way stop warrant for 12 separate hours even though only 8-hours are required to meet the warrant. Table 2 – Existing Warrant Analysis Results Year Scenario All-way Stop Warrant (8-Hour) Traffic Signal Warrants Warrant 1 (8 Hour) Warrant 2 (4 Hour) Warrant 3 (Peak Hour) 2019 Eden Ave at Grange/Willson Rd Met Not Met Not Met Not Met 12 of 8 hours 3 of 8 hours 0 of 4 hours 0 of 1 hour 2019 W. 50th St at Eden Avenue (1) Not Met Not Met Met Met 1 of 8 hours 5 of 8 hours 4 of 4 hours 3 of 1 hour 2019 Eden Ave at Arcadia/Normandale Met Not Met Not Met Not Met 13 of 8 hours 3 of 8 hours 1 of 4 hours 0 of 1 hour 2019 Grange Road at NB TH 100 Ramp Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met 0 of 8 hours 0 of 8 hours 0 of 4 hours 0 of 1 hour Notes: (1) Eden Avenue minor is a right turn only movement at W. 50th Street; however, volume exceeds capacity for the right turn movement and therefore only a 50% right turn reduction was taken. Alternatively, the westbound left turn also meets warrants 2 & 3 if it is treated as the minor approach. All-way stop control warrants are met at both Eden Avenue at Grange Road and Eden Avenue at Arcadia Avenue. Meeting this warrant would indicate that roundabout control is also justified at both intersections. The intersection of W. 50th Street at Eden Avenue does not meet the All-Way nor Warrant 1 for traffic signal control; however, it does meet both traffic signal Warrant 2 and Warrant 3. Typically, control Warrant 1 is desired for installation of a traffic signal as it considers 8-hours of the day. Warrants 2 and 3 have less hours throughout the day to meet, and thus a traffic signal isn’t necessarily needed throughout the remainder of the day. Installing a traffic signal solely based on Warrants 2 and 3 could add unnecessary delays to the major street traffic throughout the remainder of the 24-hour day; therefore, an engineering study should be considered for installation of signal control. The existing intersection of Grange Road and the northbound TH 100 ramp does not meet either control warrant. 4.2 Alternative Safety Considerations To improve safety within the study area, changes to intersection control and intersection access can have a significant impact and were considered in the build alternative development. The following information provides insight into the various intersection control average crash rates as well as the potential reduction in vehicle conflict points with a variety of intersection designs and access reduction. EDINA 161189 Page 13 4.2.1 Intersection Control Average Crash Rates While no future vehicular crash predictive estimates were included in this analysis, a review of the MnDOT Statewide average crash rates for various intersection control is provided for reverence information. The following list shows the most recent MnDOT 5-year average crash rates based on control type.  Signalized intersections with less than 15,000 Average Daily Traffic for the highest volume leg of the intersection and a speed limit below 45 mph experience 0.52 crashes per million entering vehicles (MEV).  Signalized intersections with more than 15,000 Average Daily Traffic for the highest volume leg of the intersection and a speed limit below 45 mph experience 0.70 crashes per MEV.  Urban minor street stop-controlled intersections experience 0.18 crashes per MEV.  All-way stop controlled intersections experience 0.35 crashes per MEV.  Single lane roundabouts have an average crash rate of 0.32 crashes per MEV.  Hybrid roundabouts (2 x 1 lanes) have an average crash rate of 0.76 crashes per MEV.  The MnDOT statewide average crash rate for “other” controlled intersections includes both right-in/right-out (RI/RO) and ¾ access intersections, the crash rate is 0.16 crashes per MEV. 4.2.2 Conflict Point Analysis Another predictor of safety at an intersection is the number of conflict points. A conflict point is any point where vehicles cross, merge, or diverge at an intersection and are the points at which a crash is most likely to occur. Reducing the number of conflict points at an intersection by reducing access can drastically improve vehicle and non-motorized safety. A typical 4-leg intersection has a total of 32 conflict points. Reducing conflict points can be accomplished by changing an intersection to roundabout control (8 conflict points), developing two separate T-intersections, or reducing the movements at an intersection. Figure 5 shows various conflict point diagrams for a 4-leg intersection, T-intersection, ¾ access T-intersection, and roundabout options. EDINA 161189 Page 14 Safety – Conflict Point Diagrams EDINA 161189 Page 15 4.3 Alternative Scenarios Due to the planning level nature of this analysis, the time frame of improvements in the study area varies significantly. Portions of the analysis may be implemented in near term projects, while others are being analyzed as long-term solutions with no actual construction timeline. In the near term, the intersection of Eden Avenue at Grange Road and Willson Road may be programmed for improvements related to redevelopment in the area and possible TIF funds. The existing all-way stop controlled intersection is skewed and has a large footprint that adds to driver confusion. To address the intersection skew, improve safety, and improve operations, the intersection was evaluated for a change to roundabout control. Two preliminary concepts were developed:  Two mini roundabouts – includes two separate T-intersections along Eden Avenue with Grange Road and Willson Road.  Mini “dog bone” roundabout – includes a single mini roundabout with an elongated shape. Additional analysis considered medium or long-term potential improvements that include the following:  W. 50th Street  Corridor safety improvements at various intersections.  Provide on-street, buffered bike lanes.  Previous Grandview Study typical section (off-street, separated bike lanes).  Grange Road  W. 50th Street Intersection improvements.  Add Trail to existing corridor.  Realign Grange Road between Willson Road and Dale Drive. The existing parking lot drive lanes would be converted to Grange Road and a new signal would be installed at the Grange/Dale intersection. The parking lot would be relocated to west of the realigned Grange Road with a potential bridge over Grange Road to provide pedestrian access to City Hall.  TH 100 Interchange Modifications:  Reconfigure to Split Offset Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI), includes single two-way frontage roads on the west side of TH 100, using a concept from Grandview Transportation Study.  Reconfigure to Split Diamond interchange, includes one-way frontage roads and an option for two-way frontage roads.  Reconfigure to Diverging Diamond Interchange at Vernon Ave. These design concepts and the operational analysis will be discussed and reviewed further in the following section. EDINA 161189 Page 16 5 Design Concepts and Traffic Operations This section will cover the initial design concept alternatives, cost estimates, traffic operations analysis results, and provide a comparison of the various scenarios. Preliminary designs of the various alternatives were created, and high-level cost estimates were developed. The preliminary designs represent the alternatives’ impacts to the surrounding land uses due to potential widening or relocation of roadways. The estimated costs are high level ranges but provide for comparison of alternative options. Cost estimates were completed using ASTM E2516 Cost Estimate Classification System and assumed to be at the Class 4 (concept study or feasibility) level. Traffic operations analyses were conducted to determine the level of service (LOS), delay, and queueing information for the AM and PM peak hour conditions for the various scenarios. LOS is a qualitative rating system used to describe the efficiency of traffic operations at an intersection. Six LOS are defined, designated by letters A through F. LOS A represents the best operating conditions (no congestion), and LOS F represents the worst operating conditions (severe congestion). For the study intersection it was assumed that a LOS D or better, for all approaches and the overall intersection, represents acceptable operating conditions. LOS for intersections is determined by the average control delay per vehicle. The range of control delay for each LOS is different for signalized and unsignalized intersections. The expectation is that a signalized intersection is designed to carry higher traffic volumes and will experience greater delays than an unsignalized intersection; driver tolerance for delay is greater at a signal than at a stop sign. Therefore, the LOS thresholds for each LOS category are lower for unsignalized intersections than for signalized intersections Table 3 shows the LOS thresholds for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Table 3 – Level of Service Thresholds Level of Service Average Control Delay (sec/veh) Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection (Stop Control/Roundabout) A 0 to 10 0 to 10 B > 10 and ≤ 20 > 10 and ≤ 15 C > 20 and ≤ 35 > 15 and ≤ 25 D > 35 and ≤ 55 > 25 and ≤ 35 E > 55 and ≤ 80 > 35 and ≤ 50 F > 80 > 50 Operational analysis was conducted using Synchro/SimTraffic software (version 11) for stop controlled and signal-controlled intersections. The average of ten simulation runs were performed to determine the necessary measure of effectiveness (MOE’s). Roundabout analysis and some interchange analyses were also performed using the Highway Capacity Software (HCS7), which implements the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) calculations; operational results of the roundabouts were similar to SimTraffic results and therefore HCS was not reported. EDINA 161189 Page 17 Currently, there is not a standard traffic operations analysis tool to evaluate a mini roundabout; there are only guidelines for the expected operational capacity of the intersection. It should be noted that a mini roundabout would have slightly less capacity than any single-lane roundabout examined in this section. FHWA guidance suggests a total entering demand for a mini roundabout to be less than 1,600 vehicles per hour on all approaches, this threshold will be reviewed for each potential roundabout solution. As previously mentioned, the entire study area will not be discussed in the following sections. With planned improvements on the west side along Vernon Avenue and Eden Avenue, the operations analysis in this section will focus on the directly impacted intersections within each alternative. 5.1 Eden Avenue Alternatives This portion of the focus area may be planned for improvements in the short term with adjacent redevelopment and possible TIF funds being available. The analysis will look at intersection improvements along Eden Avenue mainly at the existing Grange Road/Willson Road intersection, including the existing all-way stop control and two roundabout control options. Some of the alternatives for Eden Avenue will directly impact the City Hall facility, and the various impacts will be discussed within each of the alternatives. 5.1.1 No Build Conditions Due to the intersection skew, the existing intersection of Eden Avenue and Grange Road/Willson Road includes a channelized southbound right turn movement and large right turn radius at the other three corners. The current design results in a large intersection footprint that leads to driver confusion at the all-way stop and long pedestrian crossing distances. While southbound has a channelized right turn, the northbound approach has a significant flare design that operates like a channelized right; the single approach lanes operate as a shared left- through lane at the stop sign. Westbound has a single shared left-through-right lane, and eastbound has two lanes of approach with a separate left turn lane and a shared through-right lane. Along Eden Avenue, sidewalks are provided on both the north and south sides of the roadway, but there is currently no boulevard space or bike facilities along the corridor. As part of the Edina Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan, bike lanes along Edin Avenue are part of the long-term vision. There is on-street parking along Eden Avenue between Willson Road and W. 50th Street. On the south side of the roadway vehicles park along the curb, this space could accommodate between 25 to 30 vehicles. On the north side of the road, pull off spaces are provided which could accommodate between 10 to 12 vehicles. Figure 6 shows the existing intersection configuration. The subsequent Tables 4 and 5 in Section 5.1.4 represent the 2024 and 2040 traffic operations analyses. This intersection will operate with all approaches at a LOS B or better through 2040. EDINA 161189 Page 18 Eden Avenue – No Build Conditions 5.1.2 Intersection Improvements (Build Short Term) With the all-way stop control warrants met, roundabout control is justified at the intersection. However, the skewed geometrics of the intersection preclude consideration of a traditional roundabout design. Instead, two alternatives were considered to improve safety and minimize construction impacts: two mini roundabouts and an elongated “dog bone” mini roundabout. In 2040, with the Eden Avenue to southbound TH 100 ramp closed, the intersection is expected to have approximately 1,250 vehicles approaching the intersection in both peak hours. This is below the mini roundabout expected capacity of 1,600 vehicles per FHWA guidance. With a ramp connection to southbound TH 100 in place, the volumes would increase but be less than 1,400 vehicles in either peak hour. The mini roundabouts will improve the safety of each intersection by reducing vehicles speeds and reducing the vehicle conflict points over the existing intersection design. A total of 41 conflict points exist between the existing intersection and City Hall access. This would be reduced to 14 or less with the two mini roundabout alternatives. 5.1.2.1 Two Mini Roundabouts The first mini roundabout design includes providing two mini roundabouts closely spaced together. Figure 7 represents the preliminary design alternative. Appendix C provides the full layout. The subsequent Tables 4 and 5 represent the 2024 and 2040 traffic operations analysis. This intersection will operate with all approaches at a LOS A through 2040. EDINA 161189 Page 19 The design would realign Willson Road to connect directly across from the southern City Hall parking lot access. Grange Road would be constructed as a separate T-intersection. The following list summarizes some of the highlights of this design being considered:  This design will improve the overall safety of the intersection by reducing speeds and reducing the overall intersection conflict points with only 6 at the Grange Road roundabout and 8 at the Willson Road roundabout.  Expected to operate very well, LOS A, though 2040.  Pedestrian crossings are improved with shorter distances and crossing a single direction of traffic at a time, with lower vehicles speeds.  The two separate mini roundabouts allow all intersection movements to occur at each mini roundabout intersection.  The design is estimated to cost between $900,000 and $1,300,000. This includes costs to reconstruct Eden Ave from TH 100 to the City Hall driveway east of Willson Road.  The design does impact the parking spaces at City Hall and would remove approximately 4 parking stalls. The access to City Hall would remain open. To reduce potential through traffic from Willson Road to W. 50th Street directly in front of City Hall, a reduced access intersection along W. 50th Street could be considered at the northern City Hall parking lot access. This configuration will be discussed later for the W. 50th Street considerations. Eden Avenue – Build Two Mini Roundabouts 5.1.2.2 Single Mini Roundabout Another concept was an elongated roundabout, designed to create a single intersection. This “dog bone” mini roundabout design would operate as a single 5-leg roundabout intersection. EDINA 161189 Page 20 Figure 8 represents the preliminary design alternative, see Appendix C for the full layout. This intersection was not explicitly analyzed as it is anticipated to have similar operations as the two mini roundabout design concept. The following list summarizes this design being considered:  This design will improve the overall safety of the intersection by reducing speeds and reducing the intersection conflict points with only 10 at the combined 5-leg roundabout.  The benefit of this design reduces any potential queueing between the two intersections as it operates as a single roundabout.  Expected to operate very well, LOS A, though 2040.  Pedestrian crossings are improved with shorter distances and crossing a single direction of traffic at a time, with lower vehicles speeds.  The design increases some turning movement distance to traverse through the intersection; the eastbound and westbound left turning traffic are most impacted.  5-leg roundabouts can be more overwhelming for drivers to know their exit.  The design is estimated to cost between $900,000 and $1,300,000. This includes costs to reconstruct Eden Ave from TH 100 to the City Hall driveway east of Willson Road.  This design has more right-of-way impacts in the southeast quadrant.  The design does impact the parking spaces at City Hall and would remove approximately 4 parking stalls. The access to City Hall would remain open. To reduce potential through traffic from Willson Road to W. 50th Street directly in front of City Hall, a reduced access intersection along W. 50th Street could be considered at the northern City Hall parking lot access. This configuration will be discussed later for the W. 50th Street considerations. Eden Avenue – Build “Dog Bone” Mini Roundabout EDINA 161189 Page 21 5.1.2.3 Comparison of Mini Roundabout Designs Converting any intersection to a mini roundabout provides numerous benefits with few disadvantages. The advantages are essentially the same between the two designs being considered. Some of the advantages of mini roundabout control include the following:  Reduced vehicle speeds.  Reduced vehicle and pedestrian conflict points.  Reduced severity and frequency of most crash types.  Improved pedestrian facility:  Shorter crossing distances.  Median refuge island.  Crossing only one direction at a time.  Typically, less delay than traffic signals or all-way-stop intersections.  Lower construction costs and impacts compared to a full-size roundabout. Disadvantages of roundabout control are limited, but additional right-of-way may be needed, additional design considerations, and may operate poorly adjacent to a signalized intersection (queuing concerns). 5.1.3 Eden Avenue Corridor Improvements and Long-Term Considerations (Build Long Term) In addition to the intersection improvements, corridor improvements along Eden Avenue between the TH 100 bridge and W. 50th Street were reviewed. Two long term considerations were assessed as part of the Eden Avenue analysis. The first scenario involves realigning Grange Road and the second scenario involves reconfiguring the TH 100 interchange. 5.1.3.1 Corridor Improvements On-street bike lanes and sidewalks were included based on the long-term City plans to include these facilities along Eden Avenue. As these changes to the corridor have negligible impacts on the traffic operations, no operations analysis was conducted for this option. Figure 9 represents the preliminary design of the Eden Avenue corridor improvements with the two mini roundabouts shown. See Appendix C for the full layout. Most of the preliminary design can fit within the existing right-of-way; however, some locations would require small right-of-way acquisitions and possible construction easements. The concept would require the existing on-street parking to be removed on the south side of Eden Avenue, east of Willson Road. This would remove approximately 25 on-street parking spots; however, the north side pull off bay can be extended to allow a few more parking spots. The corridor changes from the City Hall driveway to W 50th St could occur at the same time as the intersection improvements, or as a separate project. The cost of the corridor changes, not including the mini roundabout costs, is estimated to be between $500,000 and $700,000. EDINA 161189 Page 22 Eden Avenue – Corridor Improvements 5.1.3.2 Grange Road Realignment Realignment of Grange Road was evaluated as part of the long-term considerations; the realignment would generally follow the alignment of the existing parking lot drive lanes directly in front of City Hall. This connection would essentially remove Grange Road and connect Willson Road to Dale Drive. The intersection would be controlled by a traffic signal at W. 50th Street with the removal of the signalized intersection at Grange Road. Full discussion of this alternative can be found later in this document in Section 5.4 of this report, including a figure of the realignment design and cost estimate. The subsequent Tables 4 and 5 include the 2024 and 2040 traffic operations analysis for the two mini roundabout design evaluated for this scenario with Grange Road realigned. This intersection will operate with all approaches at a LOS B in 2024. By 2040, the eastbound approach will operate at a LOS D due to the increased demands from the TH 100 connections. Therefore, both mini roundabout concept designs would operate acceptably through 2040 if Grange Road was realigned and connected Willson Road to Dale Drive. 5.1.3.3 TH 100 Interchange The second long term consideration for Eden Avenue was the potential reconfiguration of the TH 100 interchange. Modifications at the interchange can impact ramp connections, roadway configurations, as well as the volumes along Eden Avenue. In later sections of this report, further discussion of the interchange alternatives will be reviewed. In general, all potential interchange reconfigurations will result in lower traffic volumes entering the existing intersections along Eden Avenue, east of TH 100. Therefore, both of the mini roundabout concept designs would operation acceptably through 2040. EDINA 161189 Page 23 5.1.4 Eden Avenue Traffic Operation Results Table 4 represents the 2024 operational results of the 3 intersection alternatives, Table 5 represents the 2040 operational results. Appendix B includes the operational results for all the study intersections. In the 2024 forecast scenario, the main Eden Avenue intersections will all operate at a LOS A for scenarios including the No Build, short-term build, and long-term build. It should be noted that east-west volumes along Eden Avenue will be lower than previous years due to the closure of the ramp to southbound TH 100; west of Grange Road the AM and PM peak hours will have between 25% and 30% less traffic along Eden Avenue. Table 4 – 2024 Eden Avenue Operations Comparison Scenario Intersection Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) No Build Eden Ave at Grange Rd/Willson Rd (All-way Stop) EB 7.3 / A 7.4 / A 8.7 / A 8.1 / A WB 7.4 / A 7.6 / A NB 8.1 / A 9.2 / A SB 7.2 / A 6.4 / A Eden Ave at City Hall Access (Minor Stop) EB 1.7 / A 1.7 / A 1.7 / A 2.1 / A WB 1.8 / A 2.3 / A SB 1.4 / A 4.9 / A Build Short Term Eden Ave at Grange Rd (Roundabout) EB 4.4 / A 3.4 / A 5.1 / A 3.4 / A WB 2.6 / A 2.2 / A SB 3.2 / A 2.7 / A Eden Ave at Willson Rd/City Hall Access (Roundabout) EB 1.4 / A 2.3 / A 1.8 / A 2.9 / A WB 3.8 / A 3.8 / A NB 2.9 / A 3.9 / A SB 0.8 / A 3.5 / A Build Long Term Eden Ave at TH 100 NB Ramp (Roundabout) EB 5.6 / A 5.1 / A 13.8 / B 8.4 / A WB 1.9 / A 2.2 / A SB 6.3 / A 6.7 / A Eden Ave at Willson Rd/ Grange Rd (Roundabout) EB 3.3 / A 4.1 / A 6.2 / A 5.9 / A WB 5.8 / A 5.5 / A NB 6.1 / A 6.1 / A SB 2.8 / A 3.6 / A In 2040, both the No Build scenario and the Build 1 scenario will operate with the main intersections at a LOS A or better. With Grange Road realigned, the increased TH 100 ramp volumes along Eden Avenue will increase delays at the roundabouts and the west mini roundabout intersection will operate at a LOS C. EDINA 161189 Page 24 Table 5 – 2040 Eden Avenue Operations Comparison Scenario Intersection Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) No Build Eden Ave at Grange Rd/Willson Rd (All-way Stop) EB 7.8 / A 7.5 / A 11.0 / B 9.2 / A WB 7.8 / A 8.1 / A NB 8.6 / A 9.6 / A SB 6.5 / A 7.3 / A Eden Ave at City Hall Access (Minor Stop) EB 1.8 / A 1.8 / A 2.0 / A 2.3 / A WB 1.9 / A 2.3 / A SB 1.3 / A 5.3 / A Build Short Term Eden Ave at Grange Rd (Roundabout) EB 4.7 / A 3.7 / A 5.8 / A 3.6 / A WB 2.9 / A 2.1 / A SB 3.6 / A 2.9 / A Eden Ave at Willson Rd/City Hall Access (Roundabout) EB 1.5 / A 2.4 / A 1.9 / A 2.9 / A WB 3.9 / A 3.9 / A NB 3.2 / A 3.9 / A SB 0.8 / A 3.2 / A Build Long Term Eden Ave at TH 100 NB Ramp (Roundabout) EB 7.1 / A 6.3 / A 29.0 / D 15.3 / C WB 2.0 / A 2.2 / A SB 7.7 / A 9.2 / A Eden Ave at Willson Rd/ Grange Rd (Roundabout) EB 3.8 / A 4.6 / A 7.8 / A 6.9 / A WB 6.0 / A 5.8 / A NB 6.8 / A 6.4 / A SB 2.8 / A 3.6 / A EDINA 161189 Page 25 5.2 W. 50th Street Alternatives This portion of the project area is currently not planned for reconstruction. The analysis will look at some intersection improvements, as well as the impacts of roadway widening, the realignment of Grange Road, and the TH 100 interchange reconfiguration. 5.2.1 No Build Conditions The three intersections in this analysis area include W. 50th Street at Grange Road, Dale Drive/City Hall, and at Eden Avenue.  Grange Road is currently controlled by a traffic signal at the T-intersection. There are no turn lanes provided along W. 50th Street, which adds delay to the through traffic as they wait behind yielding left turning or slow right turning traffic.  Dale Drive and the northern City Hall access operate under minor street stop control; the two minor approaches are offset. Dale Drive provides access to a residential area with limited access; approximately 70 homes are in this area. Along W. 50th Street, there is an eastbound right turn lane with a transit stop and left turn lanes are not provided.  Eden Avenue operates under minor street stop control with an existing westbound left turn lane provided at the T-intersection. The westbound left turn movement has historically experienced significant demand from vehicles traveling to southbound TH 100. The ramp closure will reduce the volume making this maneuver by approximately 45%. The Eden Avenue approach consists of almost 100% of the traffic making a right turn onto W. 50th Street. This intersection does meet Warrants 2 and 3 for a traffic signal (Section 4.1). Figure 10 shows the existing intersection configurations along W. 50th Street. The subsequent Tables 6 and 7 represent the 2024 and 2040 traffic operations analysis for existing conditions, Appendix B includes the operational results for all the study intersections. The overall intersection operations will perform at a LOS B or better through 2040 at all of the intersections with the minor approaches at Dale Drive and at Eden Avenue will operate at a LOS E. Currently, W. 50th Street has limited boulevard space and provides narrow sidewalks on both sides of W. 50th Street. As part of the Edina Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan, bike lanes along W. 50th Street are part of the long-term vision. W. 50th Street – No Build Conditions EDINA 161189 Page 26 5.2.2 Safety Improvement Mitigations To improve the overall safety and efficiency of the corridor at these three intersections, some intersection improvements and mitigations could be implemented.  At the Grange Road intersection, adding a westbound left turn lane on W. 50th Street would improve the intersection efficiency.  A westbound left turn lane would separate the yielding left turning traffic from the through movements and improve both the safety and efficiency of the intersection. While this movement is relatively low under the existing volumes, restricting access at adjacent intersections may increase the demands.  At the Dale Drive and northern City Hall access, the minor street approaches can have a hard time finding gaps in the high volume of through traffic along W. 50th Street. This results in LOS E for the minor approaches; however, the left turn movements operate at a LOS F and the right turn movements are LOS C or better. Reducing the intersection to a ¾ access would improve the safety and efficiency of the intersection.  Left turn lanes would be added along W. 50th Street to separate out the movement.  The minor approaches would only be allowed to turn right onto W. 50th Street. This movement is anticipated to still operate at LOS C or better; however, outbound left turning and crossing traffic would need to reroute.  At Eden Avenue, the intersection effectively operates as a ¾ access intersection under existing conditions. Adding medians to reconfigure the intersection to a true ¾ access would provide a reduction in conflict points and provide a wide pedestrian median refuge island.  Though the intersection does meet a traffic signal warrant, a traffic signal would increase delay for all users and crashes at the intersection would be expected to increase as well. The reduction to a ¾ access intersection at the Dale Drive and City Hall access will divert some of the low volume movements from the minor approaches. The change will improve the safety of the intersection by reducing the vehicle conflict points from 32 down to 10. Vehicles from City Hall destined to the west can use one of the alternative parking lot driveways to head west, either to Grange Road or to Eden Avenue. Dale Drive traffic destined to the east also have a few options such as diverting to E Sunnyslope Road, completing a westbound U-turn maneuver at Grange Road, or complete a westbound left turn at Grange Road and loop around Eden Avenue to W. 50th Street. Figure 11 represents the preliminary design for these intersection improvements, see Appendix C for the full layout. This alternative was not explicitly analyzed for traffic operations as it is anticipated to have improved operations over the No Build alternative. The added turn lanes and reduced access will provide a safer and more efficient corridor for all users. It should be noted that while the figure shows the entire segment being reconstructed, the area could be split into two phases, with the changes at Grange Road and Dale Drive as the first phase and the changes to Eden Avenue as a second phase. EDINA 161189 Page 27 W. 50th Street – Safety Improvement Alternative The design includes sidewalk boulevards on both sides of the roadway and additional medians through the segment. Both features add additional roadway width which has right-of-way impacts. The design includes 11-foot traffic lanes with a 1-foot buffer against the curbs. A 6-foot boulevard and a 10-foot multi-use trail are provided on both sides of the roadway. The south side of the roadway was held at its current location to avoid significant impacts to the City Hall driveway and parking lot. The additional width would require up to approximately 20-feet of additional right-of- way on the north side of the roadway. Exact ROW needs would be identified during final design and widths may be less than the estimate provided above. Other impacts such as retaining walls. landscaping, and fencing would be determined during final design. This alternative would improve the overall safety of the W. 50th Street corridor with the addition of turn lanes, reduced access, and medians that act as a traffic calming measure. The estimated cost for the west portion or the Grange Road and Dale Drive improvements along 50th Street is estimated to be between $1,200,000 and $1,800,000; the estimated cost for the east portion or the Eden Avenue intersection improvements along 50th Street is between $900,000 and $1,300,000. These estimated costs do not include ROW acquisition or easement costs. Depending on available funding, this work could be completed in separate projects or in a single project. 5.2.3 Buffered Bike Lanes As part of the Edina Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan, buffered bike lanes along W. 50th Street are part of the long-term vision. The existing right-of-way width is limited to approximately 80 feet through this segment. Traffic volumes range from approximately 20,000 vehicles per day near the TH 100 interchange, to upwards of approximately 27,000 vehicles per day east of Eden Avenue. These high daily volumes limit the ability to reduce the number of through lanes on this segment of W. 50th Street. Figure 12 represents the preliminary design for the inclusion of bike lanes as well as the intersection safety improvements discussed previously. Appendix C provides the full layout. This EDINA 161189 Page 28 alternative was not analyzed for traffic operations as the bike lanes would have negligible impacts on the intersection operations. W. 50th Street – Buffered Bike Lanes Alternative The design includes sidewalk boulevards and buffered bike lanes on both sides of the roadway and additional center medians through the segment. These features require additional roadway width which has considerable right-of-way impacts. Specifically, the design includes 11-foot traffic lanes with a 1-foot buffer against the curbs. Both sides of the roadway include a 6-foot bicycle lane with 2-foot buffer, a 6-foot boulevard, and a 10- foot multi-use trail. The south side of the roadway was held at its current location to avoid significant impacts to the City Hall driveway and parking lot. The additional width would require up to approximately 30-feet of additional right-of-way on the north side of the roadway and would likely require the purchase of both parcels on the north side of W 50th St at Dale Dr due to proposed improvements being located so close to the homes. Other impacts such as retaining walls. landscaping, and fencing would be determined during final design. The estimated cost of this alternative to include the additional bike lanes through this segment is between $1,700,000 and $2,500,000. This cost does not include ROW acquisition, easement, or resident relocation costs. 5.2.4 2016 Grandview Study Section As part of the 2016 Grandview Transportation Study, Figure 3.20 from the study represented a typical section that would fit into the existing 80-foot right-of-way. This design does not meet State Aid standard widths for various components. Figure 13 represents the typical section of the Grandview Transportation Study Figure 3.20, designed to meet State Aid standard. See Appendix C for the full layout. This alternative was not analyzed for traffic operations. EDINA 161189 Page 29 W. 50th Street – 2016 Grandview Study Section The design includes bike lanes on both sides of the roadway and medians or turn lanes through the segment; however, sidewalk boulevards were not included in this section. This section would require a 95-ft ROW. The design includes 11-foot traffic lanes with a 1-foot buffer against the curbs with separated, off- street 5-foot bike lanes and 8-foot sidewalk on both sides of the roadway. The south side of the roadway was held at its current location to avoid significant impacts to the City Hall driveway and parking lot. The additional width would require up to approximately 15-feet of additional right-of- way on the north side of the roadway. The segment near Eden Avenue would require a retaining wall on the north side of W. 50th Street. As this option had major ROW impacts, no cost estimate was developed. 5.2.5 W. 50th Street Long Term Considerations Two long term considerations were reviewed as part of the W. 50th Street analysis; the first involves realigning Grange Road, the second involves reconfiguring the TH 100 interchange. 5.2.5.1 Grange Road Realignment Consideration of relocating Grange Road was evaluated as part of the long-term considerations. The realignment would use the existing parking lot drive lanes directly in front of City Hall. This connection would essentially remove Grange Road and connect Willson Road to Dale Drive, the intersection would be controlled by a traffic signal at W. 50th Street with the removal of the signalized intersection at Grange Road. Full discussion of this alternative can be found in Section 5.4 of this report, including a figure of the realignment design and cost estimate. The subsequent Tables 6 and 7 represent the 2024 and 2040 traffic operations analysis; the new Grange Road intersections will operate with all intersections at a LOS B or better through 2040. Appendix B includes the operational results for all of the study intersections. EDINA 161189 Page 30 5.2.5.2 TH 100 Interchange The second long term consideration was reconfiguring of the TH 100 interchange. In the proceeding sections of this report further discussion of the interchange alternatives will be reviewed. In general, all of the interchange reconfigurations result in similar traffic volumes along W. 50th Street through these intersections. The realignment of Grange Road would likely improve the intersection spacing between the reconfigured interchange intersections; however, the reconfiguration may not require the Grange Road realignment. 5.2.6 W. 50th Street Traffic Operation Results Traffic operations were only evaluated for the No Build conditions and Grange Road realignment scenario. The reduced access improvements were not operationally evaluated as they are a safety improvement with operations similar to the No Build conditions; the rerouted traffic is very minor and would have minimal impact on intersection delays. Table 6 represents the 2024 operational results of the 2 alternatives evaluated for traffic operations, and Table 7 represents the 2040 results, Appendix B includes the operational results for all the study intersections. In the 2024 forecast scenario, the intersections will all operate at a LOS B or better with no major congestion for the No Build and Build scenario. The minor street left turn volumes from Dale Drive and the northern City Hall access will operate at a LOS F in both peak hours, and the northbound right turn from Eden Avenue will operate at a LOS E in the PM peak hour, see Appendix B for detail turn move LOS. Table 6 – 2024 50th Street Operations Comparison Scenario Intersection Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) No Build 50th St at Grange Rd (Signal) EB 1.5 / A 8.2 / A 4.4 / A 11.3 / B WB 6.0 / A 7.6 / A NB 34.5 / C 35.2 / D 50th St at Dale Dr (Minor Stop) EB 1.3 / A 1.4 / A 1.5 / A 1.9 / A WB 1.0 / A 0.7 / A NB 11.6 / B 30.6 / D SB 17.6 / C 8.2 / A 50th St at Eden Avenue (Minor Stop) EB 0.6 / A 1.7 / A 0.9 / A 4.8 / A WB 1.5 / A 2.6 / A NB 7.1 / A 35.0 / E Build 2 50th St at Dale Dr/Grange Rd (Signal) EB 2.2 / A 9.7 / A 2.7 / A 9.7 / A WB 9.4 / A 7.9 / A NB 19.1 / B 26.5 / C SB 22.0 / C 15.6 / B 50th St at Eden Avenue (Minor Stop) EB 0.7 / A 1.9 / A 1.1 / A 4.7 / A WB 1.7 / A 2.9 / A NB 7.3 / A 31.8 / D EDINA 161189 Page 31 By 2040, the operations on the minor street approaches under stop control will have increased delays as the traffic along W. 50th Street increases and the available gaps decrease. As delays increase at minor stop-controlled approaches, vehicles may make riskier maneuvers by accepting a gap in traffic they normally would not take. This may lead to an increase in crashes. The existing traffic signal at Grange Road will operate at LOS B or better though the 2040 forecast year. The minor stop control at Dale Drive and the northern City Hall driveway will see significant delays for the left turn movements onto W. 50th Street; the AM peak hours had the highest delays with between 1 to 2 minutes. During the PM peak hour, the northbound Eden Avenue right turn onto W. 50th Street will operate at a LOS F with just over a minute of delay. The PM peak hour has the highest eastbound through and northbound right turn volume, the volumes are much less throughout the remainder of the day when the approach operates with acceptable delays. The realignment of Grange Road would provide LOS B or better at the new signal location. With the signal closer to the Eden Avenue intersection, the northbound approach is operating slightly better as more gaps become available when the signal changes the phasing. Table 7 – 2040 50th Street Operations Comparison Scenario Intersection Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) No Build 50th St at Grange Rd (Signal) EB 1.5 / A 9.8 / A 3.9 / A 11.5 / B WB 8.0 / A 8.5 / A NB 36.1 / D 35.8 / D 50th St at Dale Dr (Minor Stop) EB 1.3 / A 2.3 / A 1.5 / A 2.0 / A WB 1.9 / A 0.6 / A NB 19.8 / C 40.3 / E SB 42.1 / E 11.2 / B 50th St at Grange Rd (Signal) EB 0.6 / A 1.9 / A 1.0 / A 7.5 / A WB 1.7 / A 3.0 / A NB 7.7 / A 65.1 / F Build 2 50th St at Dale Dr/Grange Rd (Signal) EB 2.5 / A 10.4 / B 2.6 / A 9.8 / A WB 10.0 / B 8.3 / A NB 20.0 / C 26.8 / C SB 28.8 / C 15.1 / B 50th St at Eden Avenue (Minor Stop) EB 0.7 / A 2.0 / A 1.1 / A 6.1 / A WB 1.9 / A 3.3 / A NB 7.3 / A 46.3 / E EDINA 161189 Page 32 5.2.7 Comparison of Alternatives While delays are high for minor street left turning traffic at the intersection of 50th Street at Dale Road under the existing minor street stop control, the vehicle volumes are relatively low (<20 in the peak hours) and there are no existing crash issues. Therefore, all the alternatives are viable options. Table 8 is a comparison of the alternatives for 50th Street. Table 9 is a comparison of the Eden Avenue intersection options. It should be noted that left turn lanes would provide a safety benefit if added on 50th Street whether the Dale Road intersection remains full access or has reduced access. Table 8 – 50th Street Build Alternatives Comparison Scenario Advantages Disadvantages W. 50th Street No Build - No cost - High delays for minor street left turn in peak hours - Potential for safety issues if left turn delays increase and drivers attempt to use smaller gaps - Poor pedestrian facilities Safety Improvements - Reduced conflict points - Medians provide traffic calming effect - Left turns provide safe storage - Reduced movements have options - Reduced minor delay with right only - 10-ft trails provide bicycle and pedestrian facility improvements - Need for rerouting of some left turns; <20 in the peak hours - Construction costs - Right-of-way impacts Buffered Bike Lanes (1) - Constructs on-street bike lanes per City Master Plan - Improves pedestrian facilities - Construction Costs - Right-of-way impacts / potential property buy-out 2016 Study Section Width (1) - Constructs on-street bike lanes per City Master Plan - Improves pedestrian facilities - Construction costs - Right-of-way impacts - Reduced boulevard space - State Aid standards require wider section than original section width Note: (1) Assumes Safety Improvement option built in conjunction. EDINA 161189 Page 33 Table 9 – 50th Street at Eden Avenue Intersection Comparison Scenario Advantages Disadvantages Eden Avenue Leave Full Access - Maintains full access for all vehicles - No costs - No improved safety ¾ Access - Reduced vehicle conflict points - Shorter pedestrian crossing distances - Pedestrian refuge island - Construction costs Traffic Signal - Provides signal phase for northbound right turns and westbound left turns - Provides protected pedestrian crossing phase - Construction costs - Increased delay for all users - Increased crashes EDINA 161189 Page 34 5.3 TH 100 Interchange Alternatives The reconfiguration of the TH 100 interchange is currently not planned for reconstruction. Previous transportation studies have conducted high level analysis of various options to reconfigure the interchange to a more standard design to improve driver navigation as well as potential create more developable land within the current interchange area. Based on the previous Grandview Green Transportation Study (2018) and City staff input, a split diamond and a split single point interchange were evaluated alongside the No Build conditions. After reviewing the traffic volumes and design, an additional interchange alterative with a diverging diamond interchange was developed. Only a 2040 operations analysis was conducted for the interchange alternatives. 5.3.1 No Build Conditions The current interchange design is a non- standard design with various elements from traditional interchange combined. Southbound has a single exit ramp with a partial collector-distributer (CD) road system, an exit to Arcadia Avenue is provided from the CD roadway. Vehicles can enter southbound TH 100 from either Vernon Avenue or Eden Avenue. Northbound TH 100 exits to a buttonhook design connecting to Grange Road, entering TH 100 can be done from the eastbound Vernon Avenue loop ramp or the westbound Vernon Avenue free right turn movement. Access from Grange Road to the northbound TH 100 loop is also provided. Two changes will be made to the interchange prior to 2024. The Eden Avenue ramp to southbound TH 100 will be closed and all traffic must enter southbound from Vernon Avenue. The southbound exit ramp to westbound Vernon Avenue will be reconfigured so the right turn is at the intersection. Figure 14 represents the existing interchange configuration. Under the current design, all intersections operate at a LOS C or better in 2040, see Table 11. TH 100 Interchange – No Build EDINA 161189 Page 35 5.3.2 Split Offset Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) This interchange reconfiguration was developed as part of the Grandview Green Transportation Study (2018) as a potential preferred alternative. The configuration is similar to an offset SPUI design. The single intersection is split between Eden Avenue and Vernon Avenue; a two-way frontage road on the west side of TH 100 would provide the connectivity between the interchange ramp intersections. Offset SPUI designs can be found around the Twin Cities metro area at TH 36 and Rice Street and at I-694 and Rice Street. Figure 15 shows the interchange design. The figure shows the planned mini roundabout at Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue, as well as the two mini roundabout design option on the east side of TH 100. See Appendix C for the full layout. The subsequent Table 12 represent the 2040 traffic operations analysis; Appendix B includes the operational results for all the study intersections. These intersections will operate with all intersections at a LOS C or better. Based on the analysis, the Eden Avenue intersection with TH 100 could operate as a traffic signal or a single lane roundabout, a mini roundabout would not provide enough capacity. The intersection volumes at this intersection are approaching 1,900 vehicles in the peak hours due to the combined ramp locations. This is above the FHWA recommended capacity threshold of a mini roundabout. With a traffic signal or a full-sized single lane roundabout, queuing for the eastbound approach could likely encroach into the Arcadia Avenue roundabout intersection and create a potential safety concern. The westbound to northbound TH 100 movement will occur at the new ramp terminal signal, removing the existing high speed free movement. If the movement occurred at the existing location, the merging of the two northbound ramp movements would require an extended entrance merge on mainline TH 100 that would impact the Minnehaha Creek Bridge. The design of this interchange would require replacing the two existing bridge structures on both Vernon Avenue and Eden Avenue over TH 100, it would also include construction of two new bridge structures for the northbound ramp movements. Retaining walls would be needed adjacent to the flyover ramp bridges to accommodate the grade changes, the two-way frontage road may also require additional retaining walls to construct the roadway adjacent to TH 100. Previous concepts of this alternative showed the two-way frontage directly adjacent and parallel to TH 100; these concepts did not include detailed design. To provide for the intersection turn radius at both the ramp terminals, and due to the roadway skews, the frontage road cannot be directly adjacent to TH 100 without significantly wider bridges or roadway realignments. The placement of the ramp intersections on the west side of TH 100 provides good intersection spacing to the existing Grange Road signal; therefore, this design does not anticipate the need to relocate Grange Road. The construction cost of this alternative is estimated to be approximately between $19 million and $25.5 million. EDINA 161189 Page 36 TH 100 – Split Offset SPUI EDINA 161189 Page 37 5.3.3 Split Diamond Interchange This interchange reconfiguration was developed as part of the Grandview Transportation Study (2016), as well as it’s consideration in the recent 4917 Eden Avenue Traffic Impact Study. The configuration is similar to a standard diamond interchange; however, the ramps are split between Vernon Avenue and Eden Avenue. A pair of one-way frontage roads on both sides of TH 100 would provide the connectivity between the interchange ramp intersections. In this alternative, both Arcadia Avenue and Grange Road function to support the local network. Split diamond interchanges can be found around the Twin Cities metro area at I-35W and 35th/36th Street, I-35W at University Avenue/4th Street, and at I-94 and 49th/53rd Avenue. Figure 16 shows the interchange design; the figure shows the planned mini roundabout at Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue, as well as the two mini roundabout option on the east side of TH 100, see Appendix C for the full layout. The subsequent Table 13 represent the 2040 traffic operations analysis, Appendix B includes the operational results for all the study intersections. These intersections will operate with all intersections at a LOS C or better. The operations analysis included traffic signals at the two Vernon Avenue intersection and mini roundabout control at the two Eden Avenue ramp intersections. The two ramp terminal intersections on Eden Avenue have less than 1,600 vehicles in the 2040 peak hours. In the 2040 AM peak hour, the southbound TH 100 ramp intersection is expected to have approximately 1,590 vehicles; however, the eastbound right turn bypass reduces the demand down to less than 1,400 and it operates well. The design of this interchange would require replacing the existing bridge structures on both Vernon Avenue and Eden Avenue over TH 100. The pair of one-way frontage roads will require retaining walls to construct the roadways adjacent to TH 100. Previous concepts of this alternative showed the one-way frontage roads directly adjacent and parallel to TH 100; these concepts did not include detailed design. To provide for the intersection turn radius at all ramp terminals, and due to the roadway skews, the frontage road cannot be directly adjacent to TH 100 without significantly wider bridges or roadway realignments. The placement of the ramp intersections on both sides of TH 100 does create close intersection spacing to the existing Grange Road signal; therefore, this design should be considered with the potential Grange Road realignment. The cost of this alternative is estimated to be between $18.7 million and $25.3 million. 5.3.3.1 Split Diamond with Two-Way Frontage Recommended as part of the Grandview Transportation Study (2016), this configuration was not designed as part of this study. The design would have minimal changes when compared to the one-way frontages, with slightly wider frontage road widths. The two-way frontage roads provide a redundant roadway network with Arcadia Avenue and Grange Road. Understanding the shifting of traffic to these redundant movements was not considered feasible. Due to the expected low volumes, the operations are expected to be similar to Table 13 results. The cost of this alternative is estimated to be between $19.7 million and $26.8 million. EDINA 161189 Page 38 TH 100 – Split Diamond EDINA 161189 Page 39 5.3.4 Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) This interchange reconfiguration was incorporated based on review of the existing traffic volumes and design considerations as part of this study. The configuration is similar to a standard diamond interchange; however, the interchange intersections crossovers are incorporated to shift the arterial traffic on the opposite side of the roadway. This design works extremely well for high turning movement interchanges as the left turn movements operates similar to a free right turn movement. At the interchange, only between 35% and 50% (AM and PM peaks) of the traffic on Vernon Avenue or W. 50th Street approaching the interchange continues along the arterial roadway past TH 100. Most of the traffic volumes at the interchange intersections is turning onto or from the TH 100 ramps. Based on the volumes reconfigured for the DDI design, approximately 70% to 85% of the total entering volumes at the interchange make a left or right turn at a ramp intersection; this high turning traffic is ideal for the DDI configuration. The existing interchange design has only approximately 65% of the total entering volumes at the interchange turn to or from the ramps, the lower percentage is due to the ramp connections on other roadways. Diverging diamond interchanges can be found around the Twin Cities metro area at I-35W at CSAH 96, Highway 169 at Highway 41, and at I-494 at 34th Avenue. Figure 17 shows the preliminary interchange design. The figure shows the planned mini roundabout at Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue, as well as the two mini roundabout design option on the east side of TH 100. See Appendix C for the full layout. The subsequent Table 14 represent the 2040 traffic operations analysis, Appendix B includes the operational results for all the study intersections. Using the HCS analysis for the DDI, these intersections will operate with all intersections at a LOS C or better. The operations analysis included traffic signals at the two Vernon Avenue intersections with all interchange traffic on this roadway. Eden Avenue would no longer carry any interchange traffic. The design of this interchange would not require replacing the existing bridge structures on either Vernon Avenue or Eden Avenue over TH 100. Due to the free left turn movements, turn lanes are not required at the ramp intersections along Vernon Avenue and the existing bridge can remain. Pedestrian facilities are located at the center of the bridge, with crossings at all the ramp crossovers. The combination of a center sidewalk and median allows for a more efficient use of the existing bridge deck, providing 11-foot lanes and a 12-foot center multi-use trail. The placement of the ramp intersections on both sides of TH 100 does create close intersection spacing to the existing Grange Road signal. While this design should be considered with the potential Grange Road realignment, due to the simple signal phasing of the DDI signals and the T-intersection phasing at Grange Road, coordination of the intersections should not be problematic; note Grange Road will have significantly less volume without TH 100 traffic. The DDI interchange provides a reduction in vehicle conflict points compared to a standard diamond, with the DDI only having 14 conflict points compared to 26 at a standard diamond. The existing interchange requires multiple intersections to be included and would have more conflicts than a standard diamond interchange. Crash modification data from FHWA suggests up to a 44% reduction in crashes converting a standard diamond to a diverging diamond interchange. EDINA 161189 Page 40 The construction cost of the DDI is estimated to be approximately $4,000,000 to $6,000,000. TH 100 – Diverging Diamond EDINA 161189 Page 41 5.3.5 Interchange Traffic Operation Results As previously noted, due to the long-term planning of any type of interchange reconfiguration, only the 2040 forecasts volumes were analyzed. Table 11 represent the No Build conditions at the four main interchange intersections. All intersections operate at a LOS C or better in both the AM and PM peak hours and all approaches operate at a LOS D or better. Table 10 – 2040 Interchange Operations – No Build Intersection Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Vernon Ave at SB TH 100 Ramps (Signal) EB 21.1 / C 26.7 / C 17.4 / B 28.4 / C WB 30.7 / C 32.1 / C SB 30.0 / C 39.7 / D Vernon Ave at NB TH 100 Ramps EB 2.7 / A 3.8 / A 2.6 / A 2.6 / A WB 4.6 / A 2.7 / A 50th St at Grange Rd (Signal) EB 1.5 / A 9.8 / A 3.9 / A 11.5 / B WB 8.0 / A 8.5 / A NB 36.1 / D 35.8 / D Grange Road at NB TH 100 Ramps (Minor Stop) EB 7.2 / A 4.9 / A 12.8 / B 8.0 / A WB 3.1 / A 7.1 / A NB 2.5 / A 3.0 / A SB 0.5 / A 0.5 / A Table 12 represent the Offset SPUI design at the two main interchange intersections. Both intersections operate at a LOS C or better in both the AM and PM peak hours. Table 11 – 2040 Interchange Operations – Offset Split SPUI Intersection Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Vernon Ave at TH 100 Ramps (Signal) EB 11.3 / B 21.7 / C 15.1 / B 22.7 / C WB 21.3 / C 26.9 / C NB 26.4 / C 31.8 / C SB 34.0 / C 25.4 / C Eden Ave at TH 100 Ramps (Signal) EB 20.1 / C 21.7 / C 22.7 / C 20.8 / C WB 28.9 / C 36.5 / D NB 22.2 / C 13.2 / B SB 16.9 / B 15.8 / B EDINA 161189 Page 42 Table 13 represent the Split Diamond interchange design at the four main interchange intersections. All intersections operate at a LOS C or better in both the AM and PM peak hours. As previously mentioned, providing two-way frontage roads with this scenario is expected to have negligible impacts to the intersection operations. Table 12 – 2040 Interchange Operations – Split Diamond Intersection Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Vernon Ave at SB TH 100 Ramps (Signal) EB 6.2 / A 13.5 / B 14.4 / B 20.0 / C WB 10.9 / B 14.1 / B SB 26.9 / C 29.5 / C Vernon Ave at NB TH 100 Ramps (Signal) EB 9.1 / A 11.3 / B 5.7 / A 9.4 / A WB 8.6 / A 6.7 / A NB 27.0 / C 30.2 / C Eden Ave at SB TH 100 Ramps (Roundabout) EB 5.9 / A 7.3 / A 6.9 / A 5.9 / A WB 8.1 / A 3.4 / A SB 7.7 / A 7.2 / A Eden Ave at NB TH 100 Ramps (Roundabout) EB 2.8 / A 11.9 / B 2.5 / A 9.4 / A WB 9.4 / A 7.5 / A NB 21.3 / C 16.0 / C Table 14 represent the Diverging Diamond interchange design at the two main interchange intersections. Both intersections operate at a LOS C or better in both the AM and PM peak hours. This analysis was conducted using the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) and was only evaluated at the two ramp terminal intersections; HCS results are in Appendix B. Table 13 – 2040 Interchange Operations – DDI (HCS Analysis) Intersection Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Vernon Ave at SB TH 100 (Signal) EB 7.3 / A 14.0 / B 15.6 / B 19.0 / B WB 18.4 / B 21.8 / C SB 15.6 / B 15.7 / B Vernon Ave at NB TH 100 (Signal) EB 20.7 / C 16.5 / B 40.1 / D 26.6 / C WB 11.0 / B 12.0 / B NB 15.8 / B 15.7 / B EDINA 161189 Page 43 5.3.6 TH 100 Interchange Alternative Comparison The following is a comparison of the various TH 100 interchange design alternatives. All concepts provide acceptable operations and would provide a safe interchange design, even the No Build alternative. Table 14 – TH 100 Interchange Comparison Scenario Advantages Disadvantages No Build TH 100 Interchange - No costs - Acceptable safety and operations - Confusing and unconventional design - Limited development area - Freeway traffic impacts up to 6 separate intersections Offset SPUI Design - Freeway traffic limited to one side of TH 100 and at two main intersections - East side of TH 100 fully open for redevelopment opportunities - Reduces WB to NB TH 100 vehicle speeds and moves away from NE quadrant - High cost with 4 new structures and retaining walls; cost up to $25 million - Concentration of freeway traffic occurs at two main intersections with overall highest delays - Close spacing of new Arcadia Ave roundabout intersection - Close spacing to new Vernon Ave rail bridge limits left turn storage Split Diamond One-Way Frontage Design - Freeway traffic focused to four main intersections with limited movements - East side of TH 100 open for redevelopment between frontage and Grange Ave. - Vernon Ave Signals operate well as do the mini roundabouts on Eden Ave - High cost with 2 new structures and extensive retaining walls; cost up to $25 million - Close spacing of new Arcadia Ave roundabout intersection - Close spacing with existing Grange Ave signal; operations should be acceptable Split Diamond Two-Way Frontage Design - Freeway traffic focused to four main intersections with limited movements - East side of TH 100 fully open for redevelopment with Grange removed - Vernon Ave Signals operate well as do the mini roundabouts on Eden Ave - High cost with 2 new structures and extensive retaining walls cost up to $27 million - Two-way frontage are redundant roadways; assume Grange is removed - Close spacing of new Arcadia Ave roundabout intersection Diverging Diamond Design - Freeway focus to two main intersections on Vernon Avenue only; Eden Ave carries no freeway traffic - Redevelopment opportunities. - DDI design performs very well with high turning traffic and is a safer interchange design - Low cost with no bridge structure replacement; costs $4 - 6,000,000. - Unconventional design, though more are being designed and constructed due to advantages. - Signal coordination can be challenging if in a long corridor EDINA 161189 Page 44 5.4 Grange Road Alternatives As part of this study, while improvements to Grange Road are being considered, improvements are not planned for reconstruction. Improvements to the corridor range from adding pedestrian facilities to complete realignment of the corridor, as previously mentioned. 5.4.1 No Build Conditions The existing Grange Road corridor extends for approximately 500-feet between Eden Avenue and W. 50th Street; it does provide a connection from Willson Road to W. 50th Street. There are currently no pedestrian facilities provided on either side of the roadway. Due to the existing access and wide intersection, this short segment has 3 to 4-lanes currently. As previously discussed, the W. 50th Street intersection is controlled by a traffic signal and the Eden Avenue intersection is controlled by an all-way stop. Between the two main intersections is the northbound TH 100 ramp intersection, currently controlled with stop signs on the TH 100 approach. The TH 100 ramp connections on Grange Road are currently an unconventional intersection:  The northbound TH 100 exit ramp approaches a channelized island to separate the left and right traffic  The west City Hall parking access is directly across from the TH 100 exit ramp; however, this approach is a reduced access right-in/right-out (RI/RO)  The northbound entrance ramp is approximately 70-feet north of the exit, effectively spreading the intersection into two separate locations. Previous analysis discussions along Eden Avenue and W. 50th Street show the existing traffic operations are acceptable. Figure 18 represents the existing Grange Road Corridor. 50th Street – Grange Road No Build Conditions EDINA 161189 Page 45 5.4.2 Grange Improvements Previous analysis has shown improvements that can be made at the intersections of Grange Road at both Eden Avenue and W. 50th Street. To improve pedestrian connectivity, a multi-use trail was explored on the west side of the roadway. If the existing TH 100 interchange ramps remain for some time, the current intersection could see a safety and operational benefit from an intersection redesign to tighten up the intersection to a standard design. Trail crossings with the current ramp design would require a two-stage crossing of approximately 140 feet to cross only 3-lanes. If the west leg was reconfigured to a standard intersection design, the trail crossing distance would be reduced significantly to approximately 40-feet or less. The west parking lot access could also be removed to reduce the total number of conflicts at the intersection; the parking lot has two other access driveways. To reconfigure the intersection and provide a trail on the west side of Grange Road, the cost is estimated to be approximately $300,000. 5.4.2.1 TH 100 Interchange Reconfiguration The reconfiguration of the TH 100 interchange, in any of the proposed alternatives, would remove the existing ramp connections to Grange Road. This would remove the access between Eden Avenue and W. 50th Street and provide the space for a trail that does not require crossings. The west parking lot access could remain as a RI/RO or be modified with more access as the volumes along Grange Road will be significantly reduce with the removal of the interchange traffic. Figure 19 represents the existing Grange Road corridor with the removal of the northbound TH 100 ramp connections assumed. A parallel trail could be added along the west side of Grange Road to provide a connection between W. 50th Street and Eden Avenue. This drawing shows a potential mid-block crossing with a connection to a proposed TH 100 pedestrian bridge. The cost estimate is strictly for the trail and Grange Road improvements and does not include a cost estimate for the pedestrian bridge. The construction cost of this alternative is estimated to be approximately $300,000 and does not include the removal of the TH 100 ramp connections. 50th Street – Grange Road Realignment EDINA 161189 Page 46 5.4.3 Grange Realignment To improve intersection spacing along W. 50th Street and improve access at Dale Drive, a realignment of Grange Road from its current location to the east was evaluated. This modification was mentioned in previous sections of this report for impacts to Eden Avenue and W. 50th Street. The realigned Grange Road would connect to Eden Avenue at the current City Hall Access, across from Willson Road, and would connect to 50th Street across from Dale Road. With Grange Road moved, the current signal at the intersection of 50th Street at Grange Road would relocate east to the new Grange Road/Dale Road intersection. This realignment consideration has many design issues such as grade challenges, providing pedestrian crossings from City Hall to the parking facility, and adding left turn lanes on W. 50th Street. The benefits of this design would include a simplified roadway network with reduced access and easier navigation. The traffic signal would provide improved access in the residential area north of W. 50th Street and better intersection spacing to the TH 100 ramp intersections. The transportation need to realign Grange Road is dependent on the configuration of the TH 100 interchange. The realignment would improve the existing interchange configuration with better signal spacing along W. 50th Street. As will be further discussed, the interchange reconfiguration will remove any need and reduce the overall benefit of the realignment of Grange Road. Figure 20 shows the Grange Road realignment configurations along W. 50th Street. See Appendix C for the full layout. Due to the many challenges and reduction of pedestrian convenience and safety, staff does not recommend any additional analysis of this option. 50th Street – Grange Road Realignment EDINA 161189 Page 47 5.4.3.1 Existing TH 100 Interchange With the existing TH 100 interchange in place, the Grange Road realignment would require all northbound traffic exiting TH 100 to go to Eden Avenue at the current intersection or the western mini roundabout if constructed. With no interchange reconfiguration, the northbound TH 100 exit ramp would need to be reconfigured to loop down to Eden Avenue and become the north leg at the western mini roundabout or the “dog bone” roundabout. This change would increase the northbound left turn on the new Grange Road alignment, requiring the traffic signal to have dual left turn lanes and a right turn lane. As discussed in the previous alternatives analysis sections, realigning Grange Road would continue to provide acceptable traffic operations at all intersections along Grange Road, Eden Avenue, and 50th Street. The construction cost of this alternative, including optional pedestrian bridge over the realigned Grange Road, is estimated to be approximately $4,000,000 to $5,800,000. Without the bridge, pedestrians would be forced to cross the realigned Grange Road at the either W 50th Street or Eden Ave. The cost of this alternative is estimated to be between $1,800,000 and $3,600,000. 5.4.3.2 TH 100 Interchange Reconfiguration With the four TH 100 interchange reconfigurations, the realignment of Grange Road becomes unnecessary, and not recommended, as the northbound TH 100 exit ramp would be realigned to other roadways. Under the existing conditions the northbound exit ramp carries approximately 7,000 vehicles per day and the access to northbound TH 100 entrance ramp carries approximately 1,500 vehicles per day that will be removed from Grange Road.  Offset Split SPUI – with this interchange design all freeway traffic is located on the west side of TH 100. The volumes on Grange Road will be significantly reduced. Intersection spacing is not a concern as the TH 100 ramp is west of TH 100.  Split Diamond One-Way Frontage – with this interchange design all freeway traffic is located at TH 100 and the volumes on Grange Road will be significantly reduced. Intersection spacing is not a major concern as closely spaced signals operate as T- intersections.  Split Diamond Two-Way Frontage – with this interchange design all freeway traffic is located at TH 100 and the volumes on Grange Road will be significantly reduced. The two-way frontage road makes Grange Road a redundant connection and the roadway could actually be removed.  Diverging Diamond - with this interchange design all freeway traffic is located on Vernon Avenue at TH 100. The volumes on Grange Road will be significantly reduced. Intersection spacing is not a major concern as closely spaced signals operate as T- intersections. EDINA 161189 Page 48 5.4.4 Grange Road Alternative Comparison The following is a comparison of the various Grange Road options. Some of the options rely on other infrastructure improvements occurring. Table 15 – Grange Road Alternatives Comparison Scenario Advantages Disadvantages Existing Grange Road Alignment No Build - No cost - Retains all access - Confusing intersection access is a safety concern - Trail option not feasible Reconstruct Existing Ramp Intersection - Low costs - Retains majority of access - Trail Crossing is feasible - Improved safety - Grange Road carries interchange traffic TH 100 Reconfiguration - Grange Road volumes significantly decrease - Trail feasible with no crossings on Grange Road - Potential tie down for TH 100 pedestrian structure - High cost (for interchange reconfiguration) Realigned Grange Road Existing TH 100 Interchange - Signal at new Grange Rd/Dale Dr intersection improves delay for Dale Road southbound left turns - Better signal spacing along 50th Street for the interchange alternatives - Roadway would be constructed partially through the existing City Hall parking lot - Pedestrian access to City Hall is challenging; may require pedestrian bridge over the new Grange Road - High cost - Higher volumes on Grange Road from existing Interchange needs dual left turns TH 100 Reconfiguration - Signal at new Grange Rd/Dale Dr intersection improves delay for Dale Road southbound left turns - Better signal spacing along 50th Street for the interchange alternatives - Lower volumes on Grange Road from existing Interchange - Roadway would be constructed partially through the existing City Hall parking lot - Pedestrian access to City Hall is challenging; may require pedestrian bridge over the new Grange Road - High cost 5.5 TH 100 Pedestrian Bridge The previous Grandview area studies have considered providing a pedestrian connection over TH 100 to provide connectivity for non-motorized users. In the summer of 2021, construction is expected to begin on a pedestrian bridge on the west side of TH 100 which connects the existing Grandview Parking ramp facility to Arcadia Avenue, over the existing railroad tracks. This connection will improve the walkablity of the Grandview area. EDINA 161189 Page 49 Providing a grade separated crossing over TH 100 would further improve the walkability of the area by providing a multi-modal alternative routes to Eden or Vernon Avenues. The interchange alternative designs at TH 100 play an integral role in the pedestrian structure length and the touchdown locations. With additional frontage road connections in some designs, the pedestrian bridge must span over those roadways and tie down to the existing grade. The DDI interchange design provides the shortest bridge span opportunity for the structure with a structure length of approximatley 475 feet. The two ramps will be lower than any of the frontage road connectsion as they connect to TH 100 closer to the bridge. With the DDI, the southbound slip ramp to Arcadia Avenue and the northbound connections to Grange Road would all be removed and provide space to reach grade sooner than other options. This alternative could be at-grade west of Grange Road and tie into an at-grade crossing of the roadway; without freeway traffic on Grange Road the volumes are expected to be much lower than existing. The construction cost of the shortest pedestrian bridge structure is estimated to be approximately $2,400,000 to $3,500,000. The Split Diamond interchange design provides the longest bridge span for the structure; the structure length is approximately 800 feet. The two frontage roads, either one-way or two-way, will be higher than TH 100 and thus the pedestrian bridge must span both frontage roads and TH 100. To tie down west of Grange Road, the facility may require additional space to tie down while meeting ADA standards. While no layout was developed for this option, it is expected the construction cost of the longest pedestrian bridge structure is estimated to be approximately $3,900,000 to $5,600,000. Figure 20 shows the shortest potential pedestrian bridge connection over TH 100. See Appendix C for the full layout. This design assumes that the DDI interchange would be constructed at TH 100. TH 100 Pedestrian Bridge – Short Span EDINA 161189 Page 50 6 Other Public Improvements Many of the City’s utility systems are also in need of improvements. The sanitary sewer and water systems within the Grandview District were studied as part of the Comprehensive Plan. The studies have identified needs for both the sanitary sewer and water systems. These needs are recommended with and without development in the area although there would be a greater and more urgent need with specific development densities and locations. The needs on the water system have been identified at the following locations Item No. Location Linear Feet 1 Vernon Ave and 50th Street from Arcadia Ave to Wooddale Ave 3500-ft 2 Arcadia Ave from Vernon Ave to Eden Ave 1000-ft 3 Future West Frontage Road from Vernon Ave to Eden Ave 1000-ft 4 Eden Ave from Highway 100 to 50th Street 900-ft The needs on the sanitary sewer system have been identified at the following locations Item No. Location Linear Feet 1 Vernon Ave and 50th Street from Arcadia Ave to Wooddale Ave 3500-ft 2 Arcadia Ave from Vernon Ave to Eden Ave 1000-ft 3 Future West Frontage Road from Vernon Ave to Eden Ave 500-ft 4 Grange Rd from Eden Avenue to 50th Street 550-ft Estimated project costs for the utility system improvements listed above have not been developed. If projects and funding become available, more detailed project scoping and cost estimating would be required to determine the required elements. EDINA 161189 Page 51 7 Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Funding A development project at 4917 Eden Avenue has preliminary approval from the City Council. A public hearing is scheduled for both the City Council and HRA to discuss establishing a TIF district near this development. City staff are working with financial consultants to determine the potential amount of TIF financing available and locations that are eligible for TIF financing. Initial reviews of where TIF financing would be eligible for public improvements are listed below. Item No. Location Linear Feet 1 Transportation: Eden Avenue from Highway 100 to the police department garage driveway 650-ft 2 Transportation: Grange Rd / Willson Rd from 4917 Eden Ave to 50th Street 850-ft 3 Transportation: 50th Street from Grange Rd to halfway between Dale Dr and Eden Ave 650-ft 4 Utility: Water and Sanitary on 50th Street from Grange Rd to halfway between Dale Dr and Eden Ave 970-ft 5 Utility: Water and Sanitary on Grange Rd from 50th Street to Eden Ave 600-ft 6 Utility: Water on Eden Ave from Highway 100 to the police department garage driveway 650-ft Initial TIF financing calculations show there may be enough TIF to fund the six public improvements listed above. Please review the final term sheet on tax increment financing related to the 4917 Eden Avenue redevelopment project to determine eligible projects and available financing. At this time, the TIF term sheet is not available. It will be part of packet materials for a future City Council or HRA meeting. EDINA 161189 Page 52 8 Conclusion This study was intended to provide both short-term analysis and long-term potential solutions for the east side of the Grandview area. Eden Avenue Improvements Estimated construction cost (TH 100 to 50th St): $1.4 – 2.0 million With potential TIF funds being available in the immediate area, the intersection of Eden Avenue at Grange Road/Willson Road is a short-term improvement design option. The existing all-way stop intersection is skewed and has a large footprint that creates some driver confusion as to who has the right-of-way. Both mini roundabout options evaluated provide a safer and more efficient intersection. Based on the overall intersection safety, operations, and construction costs, the two mini roundabout alternative is recommended. While the mini roundabout options are very similar, the two mini roundabouts provide for better flexibility with any future roadway changes. W. 50th Street Improvements Estimated construction cost (Grange to Eden): $2.1 – 3.1 million The existing corridor includes a traffic signal at Grange Road and minor street stop control at Dale Drive and Eden Avenue. While the Grange Road signal operates well, the Dale Drive intersection does have poor levels of service during the peak hours for traffic trying to enter W. 50th Street. Three build mitigations were reviewed for this corridor. To improve the safety and operations of the corridor, a reduced access scenario with turn lanes is recommended. Dale Drive and Eden Avenue were converted to ¾ intersection. While the change at Eden Avenue would have little impact to existing vehicles, at Dale Drive the minor street lefts would have to use adjacent roadways to continue to their destination. The addition of left turn lanes and reduced access would considerably improve the safety of the corridor; however, the additional width for turn lanes and medians would require approximately 20-feet of right of way on the north side of Eden Avenue. Grange Road relocation Estimated construction cost: $300,000 The existing Grange Road corridor is a short segment between Eden Avenue and W. 50th Street that includes the northbound TH 100 ramp intersection. The existing TH 100 intersection has wide medians and non-standard design elements that add to some driver confusion. To improve the existing corridor, the TH 100 intersection could be reconfigured to a standard intersection design with a potential trail or sidewalk connection on the west side of Grange Road. The reconfiguration would create a normal intersection with easier driver navigation and the trail would provide a connection between W. 50th Street and Eden Avenue. TH 100 Interchange Reconfiguration Estimated construction costs: • Split offset single point urban interchange: $20.0 – 27.0 million • Split diamond interchange: $19.0 – 26.5 million • Diverging diamond interchange: $ 4.0 – 6.0 million EDINA 161189 Page 53 The existing interchange is a non-standard design with multiple ramp connections to different arterials. This study reviewed three proposed interchange designs that would all improve the area from a safety, operational, and driver navigation standpoint. Previous studies proposed a split offset single point urban interchange (SPUI) design. The design would create a 2-way frontage road on the west side of TH 100 with flyover bridges for the two northbound ramp connections to TH 100. This design would provide a safe and efficient options; however, the design requires extensive retaining walls and bridge structures. The construction costs are estimated between $20 million and $27 million. Another option previously proposed is a split diamond interchange configuration. This would create frontage roads on both sides of TH 100 to connect between Eden Avenue and W. 50th Street; the frontage roads could be either one-way or two-way configurations. A typical split diamond only requires one-way frontage roads to provide the supporting arterial network for this interchange design; one-way frontages also offer the ability to tighten the design. Providing two- way frontages provides redundant connections and increase the design with for the roadways and intersections to allow for all movements. The base construction costs are estimated to be between $19 million and $25 million; the two-way frontages would increase the costs by approximately $1 million to $1.5 million. The last interchange concept developed is the recommended option based on the existing and future traffic demands and the existing bridge structure. A diverging diamond interchange (DDI) was evaluated as this design works very well for high turning volumes and within limited bridge structure. This interchange could be constructed without the need to replace the existing bridge over TH 100, significantly reducing the construction cost. The design also removes all interchange traffic from Eden Avenue which will improve the safety and operations of the corridor. The construction costs are estimated to be between $4 million and $6 million for this reconfiguration. Pedestrian Bridge Estimated construction costs: • Shorter bridge (with diverging diamond interchange): $2.4 – 3.5 million • Longer bridge (with existing, SPUI, or offset diamond interchange): $3.9 – 5.6 million A pedestrian connection over TH 100 has been considered in previous studies and is considered vital to the vibrancy of the area. The structure is very dependent on the TH 100 interchange design as the bridge length is tied to the existing and future ramp connections. The diverging diamond would provide the shortest bridge structure length and ultimately the least expensive options; the approximate 475-foot structure is estimated to be between $2.4 million and $3.5 million. The existing, SPUI, and offset diamond would have a significantly longer structure, an approximate 800-foot bridge would be required to span the ramps and frontage roads. This option is estimated to be between $3.9 million and $5.6 million Appendix A Intersection and Volume Figures !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(Vernon Ave SGus Young Ln Arcadia AveInt e r l a c h e n B l v d Eden Ave Grange RdW 50th St Norma n d a l e R dBrookside Ave?úA@ ?úA@ 12 2 3 4 6 17 16 11 7 8 9 10 1 13 14 15 18 5 Intersection Lane Geometrics Figure 1Grandview East Transportation Study City of Edina Project: EDINA 156818 User Name: ljohnsonProjection: Hennepin County Coords.Source: ESRI Online Print Date: 7/27/2021 èéEden Ave Vernon Ave12 ³>=³>P>PP>³Arcadia AveèéVernon Ave Grange Rd6 >= ³OW 50th St ³P!"$W 50th St City Hall7 OPPO>=Dale DrO³=!"$Eden Ave8 > W 50th St ³P³>³ =!"$E Sunnyslope Rd9 =W 50th St ³³PO>Eden Ave Brookside Ave13 !"$=>P³>Eden Ave Our Lady Of Grace School Access14 !"$OP=>OP=>Eden Ave Normandale Rd15 >P>PArcadia Ave!",$OPOP Eden Ave Ramp Closed16 Eden Ave Willson Rd17 O=>P>PGrange Rd!",$!"$City Hall18 =Eden Ave ³PO=!"$Grange Rd11 PO>==W 50th St ³³èéVernon Ave Gus Young Ln2 Interlachen Blvd>PP>>P>³P>³Vernon Ave 3 !"$= ³³³PP èéVernon Ave TH 100 West Ramps4 >=O³³=³OGus Young Ln Vernon Ave1 ³>=³P>³O=O=!"$ !"$S TH 100 Ramp Arcadia Ave10 ³³>=W 50th St TH 100 East Ramps5 ³³=³³=Intersection ID Intersection GeometricsOP X !"$ Signalized Intersectionèé Minor Street Stop Control !",$All Way Stop Control !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(Vernon Ave SGus Young Ln Arcadia AveInt e r l a c h e n B l v d Eden Ave Grange RdW 50th St Norma n d a l e R dBrookside Ave?úA@ ?úA@ 12 2 3 4 6 17 16 11 7 8 9 10 1 13 14 15 18 5 2024 No Build Volumes Figure 2Grandview East Transportation Study City of Edina Project: EDINA 156818 User Name: ljohnsonProjection: Hennepin County Coords.Source: ESRI Online Print Date: 7/28/2021 èéEden Ave Vernon Ave12 190 / (164)2 / (4)205 / (224)2 / (2)619 / (915)262 / (283)6 / (2)5 / (10)4 / (5)11 / (7)383 / (493)117 / (107)Arcadia AveèéVernon Ave Grange Rd6 >= 1371 / (897)8 / (8) 614 / (1162)75 / (85) W 50th St 165 / (281)132 / (198)!"$W 50th St City Hall7 3 / (1)1357 / (860) 12 / (6) 19 / (23)687 / (1319)40 / (18)20 / (23)1 / (0)5 / (3)2 / (22)3 / (22)Dale Dr!"$Eden Ave8 > 1372 / (867)184 / (128) 691 / (1336)4 / (8) W 50th St 0 / (0)199 / (243)=!"$E Sunnyslope Rd9 =5 / (8)1551 / (992) 1 / (2)889 / (1577) W 50th St 5 / (3)0 / (8)>!"$S TH 100 Ramp Arcadia Ave10 ³16 / (25)56 / (32)117 / (228)³251 / (224)>=Eden Ave Brookside Ave13 !"$=>³>3 / (4)377 / (359) 4 / (2)362 / (379)3 / (13)0 / (15)Eden Ave Our Lady Of Grace School Access14 !"$=> 1 / (0)327 / (351)152 / (17)53 / (10)151 / (18)2 / (1)251 / (378)109 / (15)0 / (2)1 / (4)=>Eden Ave Normandale Rd15 Arcadia Ave!",$ 102 / (102)293 / (173)44 / (49)64 / (81)71 / (89)15 / (9)51 / (59)306 / (291)46 / (50)123 / (114)48 / (111)26 / (32)Eden Ave Ramp Closed16 439 / (324) 347 / (332) Eden Ave Willson Rd17 Grange Rd!",$ 3 / (10)143 / (91)42 / (52)98 / (95)95 / (158)44 / (73)174 / (142)125 / (142)102 / (101)239 / (168)111 / (125)35 / (33)!"$City Hall18 =5 / (5)183 / (131) 10 / (10)194 / (238) Eden Ave 5 / (22)5 / (5)!"$Grange Rd11 171 / (246)307 / (238)5 / (5)78 / (88)148 / (115)122 / (193)2 / (2)>=4 / (40)=W 50th St ³³èéVernon Ave Gus Young Ln2 Interlachen Blvd308 / (376)379 / (420)81 / (73)19 / (29)67 / (116)13 / (24)178 / (292)560 / (769)64 / (37)162 / (99)84 / (80)373 / (426)Vernon Ave 3 !"$= 768 / (869)192 / (185)914 / (1180)32 / (39)³=Gus Young Ln Vernon Ave1 !"$ 61 / (65)4 / (12)52 / (73)13 / (9)720 / (1008)76 / (59)12 / (12)4 / (12)12 / (12)29 / (27)467 / (456)57 / (55)³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³ èéVernon Ave TH 100 West Ramps4 545 / (514)406 / (329) 723 / (914)383 / (450)223 / (355)71 / (76)364 / (655)³>=³>³=W 50th St TH 100 East Ramps5 585 / (335)951 / (843) 689 / (1247)398 / (322) ³=³=³>³=³>=³>=³>=>=³=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=>³=³>³>³=³=³>Arcadia AveIntersection ID Turning MovementsOP X XX / (XX)AM Peak Hour VolumePM Peak Hour Volume !"$ Signalized Intersectionèé Minor Street Stop Control !",$All Way Stop Control !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(Vernon Ave SGus Young Ln Arcadia AveInt e r l a c h e n B l v d Eden Ave Grange RdW 50th St Norma n d a l e R dBrookside Ave?úA@ ?úA@ 12 2 3 4 6 17 16 11 7 8 9 10 1 13 14 15 18 5 2040 No Build Volumes Figure 3Grandview East Transportation Study City of Edina Project: EDINA 156818 User Name: ljohnsonProjection: Hennepin County Coords.Source: ESRI Online Print Date: 7/28/2021 èéEden Ave Vernon Ave12 195 / (170)2 / (4)214 / (234)2 / (2)649 / (958)275 / (297)6 / (2)5 / (11)4 / (5)12 / (7)402 / (517)122 / (113)Arcadia AveèéVernon Ave Grange Rd6 >= 1435 / (940)8 / (8) 643 / (1218)78 / (88) W 50th St 172 / (293)137 / (208)!"$W 50th St City Hall7 3 / (1)1420 / (901) 13 / (6) 20 / (24)718 / (1383)42 / (19)21 / (24)1 / (0)5 / (3)2 / (23)3 / (23)Dale Dr!"$Eden Ave8 > 1436 / (908)193 / (133) 722 / (1401)4 / (8) W 50th St 0 / (0)207 / (254)=!"$E Sunnyslope Rd9 =5 / (8)1624 / (1038) 1 / (2)928 / (1653) W 50th St 5 / (3)0 / (8)>Eden Ave Brookside Ave13 !"$=>³>3 / (4)390 / (373) 4 / (2)381 / (398)3 / (14)0 / (16)Eden Ave Our Lady Of Grace School Access14 !"$=> 1 / (0)377 / (364)160 / (18)56 / (11)159 / (19)2 / (1)265 / (397)114 / (16)0 / (2)1 / (4)=>Eden Ave Normandale Rd15 Arcadia Ave!",$ 106 / (104)303 / (178)47 / (52)67 / (85)75 / (93)15 / (9)54 / (61)322 / (306)49 / (53)128 / (119)51 / (116)26 / (33)Eden Ave Ramp Closed16 456 / (334) 363 / (348) Eden Ave Willson Rd17 Grange Rd!",$ 3 / (11)149 / (93)45 / (55)100 / (98)99 / (165)46 / (76)181 / (147)130 / (149)106 / (105)248 / (173)117 / (130)37 / (35)!"$City Hall18 =5 / (5)192 / (136) 11 / (11)202 / (249) Eden Ave 5 / (23)5 / (5)!"$Grange Rd11 179 / (258)321 / (247)5 / (5)81 / (91)155 / (120)126 / (201)2 / (2)>=4 / (42)=W 50th St ³³èéVernon Ave Gus Young Ln2 Interlachen Blvd322 / (394)397 / (441)85 / (76)20 / (31)70 / (122)14 / (25)186 / (305)588 / (806)67 / (39)170 / (104)88 / (84)391 / (446)Vernon Ave 3 !"$= 804 / (911)199 / (191)959 / (1236)34 / (41)³=Gus Young Ln Vernon Ave1 !"$ 63 / (68)4 / (13)55 / (76)14 / (10)755 / (1057)79 / (61)13 / (13)4 / (13)13 / (13)31 / (29)489 / (478)59 / (58)³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³ èéVernon Ave TH 100 West Ramps4 570 / (539)424 / (343) 755 / (956)401 / (471)234 / (372)73 / (79)381 / (685)³>=³>³=W 50th St TH 100 East Ramps5 613 / (351)994 / (882) 721 / (1306)415 / (335) ³=³=³>³=³>=³>=³>=>=³=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=>³=³>³>³=³=³>Arcadia Ave!"$S TH 100 Ramp Arcadia Ave10 ³17 / (26)59 / (32)122 / (239)³262 / (232)>=Intersection ID Turning MovementOP X XX / (XX)AM Peak Hour VolumePM Peak Hour Volume !"$ Signalized Intersectionèé Minor Street Stop Control !",$All Way Stop Control Appendix B Traffic Operational Results Table B1 Eden Avenue 2024 No Build Conditions AM & PM Peak Hours L T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOS Delay (S/Veh)LOS Delay (S/Veh)LOS Storage (feet) 3 Avg.Queue (feet) 1 MaxQueue (feet) 1 % Block Thru (2) ----> % Block Left (2) <---- Link Length(feet) Avg.Queue (feet) 1 MaxQueue (feet) 1 % Block Right (2) ----> % Block Thru (2) <---- Storage (feet) 3 Avg.Queue (feet) 1 MaxQueue (feet) 1 Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal)EB 6 5 4 15 19.6 B 22.6 C 4.7 A 17.0 B 50 20 35 0 0 356 20 39 0 0 0 0 0 WB 206 2 187 395 18.8 B 19.5 B 8.7 A 14.1 B 20.8 C 100 80 148 0 1 % 635 67 218 0 0 0 0 0 NB 2 619 263 884 54.4 D 31.4 C 5.9 A 24.0 C 100 20 27 0 21 % 379 179 343 3 %0 250 62 244 SB 117 383 11 511 28.4 C 19.0 B 13.9 B 20.8 C 145 59 154 0 1 % 792 97 182 1 %0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 12 4 12 28 24.1 C 17.7 C 4.6 A 14.9 B 0 0 0 0 0 204 20 41 1 %0 50 20 33 WB 52 4 61 117 21.2 C 21.1 C 10.3 B 15.4 C 4.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 418 33 83 6 % 2 % 50 28 79 NB 13 720 76 809 5.9 A 3.6 A 3.8 A 3.7 A 100 20 26 0 0 792 20 60 1 %0 140 20 35 SB 57 467 29 553 10.9 B 1.4 A 1.3 A 2.4 A 100 22 70 0 0 382 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 178 560 64 802 35.6 D 19.0 B 17.0 B 22.5 C 150 101 216 0 1 % 382 177 364 1 %0 0 0 0 WB 81 379 308 768 24.1 C 13.7 B 11.9 B 14.0 B 22.4 C 200 44 113 0 0 390 111 235 0 0 0 0 0 NB 19 67 13 99 47.4 D 42.4 D 22.5 C 40.3 D 50 20 71 0 22 % 438 62 142 0 0 0 0 0 SB 373 84 162 619 36.2 D 28.9 C 15.4 B 29.7 C 590 180 333 1 % 1 %0 115 273 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 0 914 32 946 0.0 0 8.9 A 6.0 A 8.8 A 0 0 0 0 5 % 390 113 379 17 %0 0 0 0 WB 0 768 0 768 0.0 0 1.2 A 0.0 0 1.2 A 9.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 192 192 0.0 0 4.1 A 48.6 E 36.4 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 295 120 348 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB 0 723 383 1,106 0.0 0 24.5 C 9.6 A 19.4 B 0 0 0 0 0 152 168 211 0 0 75 78 176 WB 406 545 0 951 30.4 C 12.5 B 0.0 0 20.0 C 21.7 C 0 0 0 0 0 378 242 435 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 364 71 223 658 37.3 D 37.1 D 9.7 A 28.0 C 500 119 238 0 0 1106 173 273 0 0 300 54 124 50th St & NB TH 100 EB 0 689 398 1,087 0.0 0 1.6 A 4.5 A 2.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 951 585 1,536 0.0 0 1.7 A 4.3 A 2.7 A 2.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 171 20 47 0 2 % 25 24 60 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Grange Rd (Signal)EB 0 614 75 689 0.0 0 1.6 A 0.9 A 1.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 171 20 72 0 0 0 0 0 WB 8 1371 0 1,379 13.4 B 6.0 A 0.0 0 6.0 A 8.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 279 131 267 0 0 0 0 0 NB 165 0 131 296 35.7 D 1.5 A 36.6 D 34.5 C 180 95 190 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 78 173 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Dale Rd EB 19 686 40 745 16.2 C 0.9 A 0.5 A 1.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 279 20 72 0 0 70 0 20 WB 12 1357 3 1,372 6.6 A 1.0 A 0.3 A 1.0 A 1.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 342 20 91 0 0 0 0 0 NB 2 0 3 5 84.3 F 0.2 A 4.7 A 11.6 B 0 0 0 0 0 370 20 27 0 0 100 20 25 SB 5 1 20 26 30.1 D 53.6 F 13.8 B 17.6 C 0 0 0 0 0 320 20 39 0 1 % 50 20 57 50th St & Eden Ave EB 0 690 4 694 0.0 0 0.6 A 0.3 A 0.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 342 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 WB 184 1372 0 1,556 7.5 A 0.7 A 0.0 0 1.5 A 1.7 A 120 49 105 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 199 199 0.0 0 0.0 A 7.1 A 7.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 242 46 108 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Sunnyslope Rd EB 1 888 0 889 0.0 A 0.4 A 0.0 0 0.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 327 20 21 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 1551 5 1,556 0.0 0 1.5 A 1.2 A 1.5 A 1.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 847 20 113 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 5 5 0.0 0 0.0 0 10.3 B 10.3 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 20 29 Eden Ave & Brookside Ave EB 4 363 0 367 4.3 A 0.9 A 0.0 0 0.9 A 100 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 374 3 377 0.0 0 0.7 A 0.5 A 0.7 A 0.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 3 3 0.0 0 0.0 0 3.5 A 3.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 345 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & OLG Entrance EB 2 252 109 363 0.0 0 1.4 A 0.6 A 1.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 142 20 55 0 0 0 0 0 WB 152 324 1 477 6.7 A 2.6 A 0.0 0 3.9 A 4.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 64 136 0 0 0 0 0 NB 53 0 151 204 29.6 D 0.0 0 5.8 A 11.8 B 320 29 115 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 32 112 SB 1 0 0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 51 306 46 403 2.1 A 3.0 A 2.1 A 2.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 27 76 0 0 0 0 0 WB 44 291 102 437 3.0 A 3.9 A 3.2 A 3.7 A 3.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 47 121 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 64 71 15 150 3.8 A 5.5 A 4.3 A 4.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 642 28 80 0 0 0 0 0 SB 26 48 123 197 4.2 A 5.3 A 4.8 A 4.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 296 37 113 0 0 0 0 0 Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100 EB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 56 0 16 72 6.3 A 0.0 0 1.3 A 5.2 A 1.2 A 340 28 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 251 0 251 0.0 0 0.6 A 0.0 0 0.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 296 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 117 0 117 0.0 0 0.1 A 0.0 0 0.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 174 124 102 400 7.6 A 9.0 A 4.7 A 7.3 A 100 43 92 0 0 767 44 94 0 0 0 0 0 WB 42 142 3 187 6.1 A 7.9 A 3.7 A 7.4 A 7.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 42 34 59 0 0 0 0 0 NB 98 94 44 236 8.4 A 9.5 A 4.6 A 8.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 432 42 102 4 %0 50 20 53 SB 35 111 238 384 7.9 A 8.2 A 6.5 A 7.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 91 50 142 1 %0 75 20 109 Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 10 194 0 204 2.6 A 1.7 A 0.0 0 1.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 42 20 39 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 183 5 188 0.0 0 1.9 A 0.2 A 1.8 A 1.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 329 20 72 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 5 0 5 10 5.6 A 0.3 A 7.4 A 1.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 370 20 30 0 0 0 0 0 Grange Rd & NB TH 100 EB 171 0 307 478 11.2 B 0.0 0 5.5 A 7.4 A 320 56 151 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200 36 153 WB 0 0 4 4 0.0 0 0.0 0 3.6 A 3.6 A 5.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 125 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 NB 148 122 2 272 2.6 A 1.8 A 1.0 A 2.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 91 20 35 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 78 5 83 0.0 0 3.3 A 0.3 A 3.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 182 20 33 0 0 0 0 0 Vehicle Queing Information (feet) Right Turn Lane Intersection Approach Demand Volumes Delay (s/veh)LOS By Approach LOS By Intersection Left Turn Lane Through Lane (s)AM Peak Hour Eden Avenue 2024 No Build Conditions AM & PM Peak Hours L T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOS Delay(S/Veh)LOS Delay(S/Veh)LOS Storage (feet) 3 Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 % Block Thru (2) ----> % Block Left (2) <---- Link Length(feet) Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 % Block Right (2) ----> % Block Thru (2) <---- Storage (feet) 3 Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 Vehicle Queing Information (feet) Right Turn Lane Intersection Approach Demand Volumes Delay (s/veh)LOS By Approach LOS By Intersection Left Turn Lane Through Lane (s) Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal)EB 2 10 5 17 16.8 B 24.2 C 6.5 A 17.1 B 50 20 23 0 1 % 356 20 47 0 0 0 0 0 WB 221 4 162 387 22.8 C 18.6 B 10.3 B 17.4 B 17.1 B 100 89 149 0 1 % 635 70 230 0 0 0 0 0 NB 2 915 295 1,212 53.8 D 22.2 C 5.8 A 18.2 B 100 20 70 0 27 % 379 190 346 1 %0 250 62 178 SB 107 493 7 607 24.6 C 12.8 B 11.2 B 14.9 B 145 55 130 0 1 % 792 90 193 1 %0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 12 12 12 36 20.2 C 28.6 D 5.5 A 18.0 C 0 0 0 0 0 204 20 66 2 %0 50 20 31 WB 73 12 65 150 28.8 D 25.5 D 14.5 B 21.8 C 5.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 418 47 139 13 % 5 % 50 38 89 NB 9 1008 59 1,076 7.9 A 3.6 A 3.5 A 3.6 A 100 20 25 0 0 792 20 20 0 0 140 0 20 SB 55 456 27 538 13.7 B 1.7 A 1.7 A 2.8 A 100 23 73 0 0 382 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 292 768 37 1,097 41.9 D 17.8 B 14.6 B 24.0 C 150 167 229 0 4 % 382 180 369 4 %0 0 0 0 WB 73 421 376 870 31.0 C 19.8 B 18.9 B 20.3 C 28.7 C 200 47 105 0 0 390 160 336 0 0 0 0 0 NB 29 116 24 169 54.0 D 47.4 D 33.6 C 46.5 D 50 29 100 0 38 % 438 96 236 0 0 0 0 0 SB 426 80 99 605 51.6 D 38.0 D 22.9 C 45.0 D 590 236 492 2 % 1 %0 121 266 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 0 1180 39 1,219 0.0 0 5.4 A 3.7 A 5.3 A 0 0 0 0 2 % 390 79 285 8 %0 0 0 0 WB 0 870 0 870 0.0 0 1.2 A 0.0 0 1.2 A 4.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 185 185 0.0 0 0.8 A 21.4 C 15.9 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 295 81 192 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB 0 914 450 1,364 0.0 0 20.2 C 8.5 A 16.4 B 0 0 0 0 0 152 164 213 0 0 75 78 174 WB 329 515 0 844 41.5 D 16.6 B 0.0 0 26.1 C 25.5 C 0 0 0 0 0 378 240 441 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 655 76 355 1,086 46.1 D 53.7 D 14.6 B 36.4 D 500 235 435 0 0 1106 280 486 6 %0 300 106 368 50th St & NB TH 100 EB 0 1247 322 1,569 0.0 0 2.0 A 4.5 A 2.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 843 335 1,178 0.0 0 1.3 A 2.3 A 1.6 A 2.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 171 20 37 0 0 25 20 37 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Grange Rd (Signal)EB 0 1162 85 1,247 0.0 0 4.4 A 3.9 A 4.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 171 92 180 0 0 0 0 0 WB 8 897 0 905 21.1 C 7.5 A 0.0 0 7.6 A 11.3 B 0 0 0 0 0 279 111 231 0 0 0 0 0 NB 281 0 199 480 38.3 D 6.2 A 35.3 D 35.2 D 180 154 206 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 114 207 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Dale Rd EB 23 1320 18 1,361 6.1 A 1.4 A 1.2 A 1.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 279 20 75 0 0 70 0 20 WB 6 860 1 867 12.3 B 0.6 A 0.0 A 0.7 A 1.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 342 20 72 0 0 0 0 0 NB 22 0 22 44 51.6 F 0.0 0 11.4 B 30.6 D 0 0 0 0 0 370 20 74 0 0 100 20 38 SB 3 0 23 26 28.5 D 0.0 0 6.4 A 8.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 320 20 27 0 0 50 20 37 50th St & Eden Ave EB 0 1337 8 1,345 0.0 0 0.9 A 0.9 A 0.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 342 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 WB 128 867 0 995 16.8 C 0.4 A 0.0 0 2.6 A 4.8 A 120 57 145 0 0 327 20 46 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 243 243 0.0 0 0.0 0 35.0 E 35.0 E 0 0 0 0 0 242 113 267 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Sunnyslope Rd EB 2 1578 0 1,580 7.7 A 0.6 A 0.0 0 0.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 327 20 48 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 992 8 1,000 0.0 0 0.8 A 0.5 A 0.8 A 0.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 8 0 3 11 34.8 D 0.0 0 3.8 A 25.9 D 430 20 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 20 20 Eden Ave & Brookside Ave EB 2 379 0 381 2.3 A 0.8 A 0.0 0 0.8 A 100 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 355 4 359 0.0 0 0.2 A 0.1 A 0.2 A 0.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 15 0 12 27 8.7 A 0.0 0 3.7 A 6.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 345 20 39 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & OLG Entrance EB 1 379 15 395 0.0 0 1.0 A 0.1 A 1.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 142 20 70 0 0 0 0 0 WB 17 345 0 362 3.7 A 0.7 A 0.0 0 0.8 A 1.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 20 64 0 0 0 0 0 NB 12 0 18 30 11.1 B 0.0 0 6.4 A 8.0 A 320 20 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 20 31 SB 4 0 2 6 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 59 291 50 400 2.9 A 3.8 A 2.8 A 3.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 36 84 0 0 0 0 0 WB 49 172 102 323 2.6 A 3.1 A 2.7 A 2.9 A 3.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 28 76 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 80 89 9 178 4.4 A 5.2 A 4.4 A 4.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 642 30 80 0 0 0 0 0 SB 32 111 112 255 3.9 A 4.0 A 3.8 A 3.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 296 28 89 0 0 0 0 0 Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100 EB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 32 0 25 57 6.3 A 0.0 0 1.2 A 4.1 A 0.7 A 340 20 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 224 0 224 0.0 0 0.5 A 0.0 0 0.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 226 0 226 0.0 0 0.2 A 0.0 0 0.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 142 142 100 384 8.7 A 10.4 B 6.2 A 8.7 A 100 42 104 0 1 % 767 54 127 0 0 0 0 0 WB 52 91 10 153 8.1 A 7.8 A 4.1 A 7.6 A 8.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 42 32 62 0 0 0 0 0 NB 95 158 73 326 10.3 B 10.4 B 5.3 A 9.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 432 54 133 8 % 1 % 50 30 94 SB 33 125 167 325 8.1 A 8.3 A 4.5 A 6.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 91 45 106 2 %0 75 20 71 Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 10 238 0 248 2.4 A 1.7 A 0.0 0 1.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 42 20 33 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 131 5 136 0.0 0 2.4 A 0.4 A 2.3 A 2.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 329 20 81 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 5 0 22 27 5.7 A 0.0 0 4.8 A 4.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 370 20 39 0 0 0 0 0 Grange Rd & NB TH 100 EB 246 0 238 484 20.6 C 0.0 0 3.7 A 12.2 B 320 88 253 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200 26 169 WB 0 0 40 40 0.0 0 0.0 0 6.2 A 6.2 A 7.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 125 20 47 0 0 0 0 0 NB 115 193 2 310 3.4 A 3.0 A 0.9 A 3.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 91 20 66 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 88 5 93 0.0 0 0.4 A 0.4 A 0.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 182 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 NOTES 1. If the reported queue is greater than zero (0), but less than ft, a minimum of ft is reported. 2. Block Percentage is proportion of analysis time (1 hour) the storage lane or through lane is blocked or blocking. 3. Multiple storage lanes of different length are averaged together to show the "Effective Storage Length" per lane.PM Peak Hour Table B2 Eden Avenue 2024 Build 1 Conditions - Realigned Wilson Rd, Mini-Roundabouts at Eden/Grange and Eden/Wilson AM & PM Peak Hours L T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOS Delay (S/Veh)LOS Delay (S/Veh)LOS Storage (feet) 3 Avg.Queue (feet) 1 MaxQueue (feet) 1 % Block Thru (2) ----> % Block Left (2) <---- Link Length(feet) Avg.Queue (feet) 1 MaxQueue (feet) 1 % Block Right (2) ----> % Block Thru (2) <---- Storage (feet) 3 Avg.Queue (feet) 1 MaxQueue (feet) 1 Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal)EB 6 5 4 15 25.2 C 24.0 C 2.5 A 19.5 B 50 20 41 0 0 356 20 36 0 0 0 0 0 WB 206 2 187 395 20.0 C 20.1 C 8.2 A 14.3 B 20.8 C 100 84 147 0 1 % 635 64 200 0 0 0 0 0 NB 2 619 263 884 80.1 F 31.1 C 6.1 A 23.8 C 100 20 30 0 22 % 379 181 332 2 %0 250 62 222 SB 116 384 11 511 29.7 C 18.3 B 13.9 B 20.7 C 145 68 144 0 1 % 792 93 178 1 %0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 12 4 12 28 19.4 C 24.2 C 5.7 A 13.8 B 0 0 0 0 0 204 20 38 0 0 50 20 35 WB 52 4 60 116 23.8 C 23.9 C 9.1 A 15.6 C 4.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 418 33 100 6 % 2 % 50 31 83 NB 13 719 75 807 6.3 A 3.3 A 3.7 A 3.4 A 100 20 26 0 0 792 0 20 0 0 140 0 20 SB 56 467 29 552 8.8 A 1.3 A 1.3 A 2.0 A 100 20 64 0 0 382 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 178 559 63 800 35.8 D 18.0 B 14.9 B 21.7 C 150 106 215 0 2 % 382 174 358 2 %0 0 0 0 WB 80 380 308 768 28.3 C 12.8 B 11.5 B 13.8 B 22.2 C 200 46 123 0 0 390 107 241 0 0 0 0 0 NB 19 66 13 98 43.5 D 42.1 D 27.5 C 40.2 D 50 20 78 0 23 % 438 60 124 0 0 0 0 0 SB 373 85 161 619 35.4 D 31.1 C 18.5 B 30.3 C 590 177 359 0 2 %0 126 274 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 0 914 31 945 0.0 0 7.6 A 5.4 A 7.5 A 0 0 0 0 4 % 390 93 390 14 %0 0 0 0 WB 0 768 0 768 0.0 0 1.1 A 0.0 0 1.1 A 6.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 192 192 0.0 0 3.1 A 29.2 D 21.9 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 295 88 264 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB 0 724 383 1,107 0.0 0 23.9 C 10.1 B 19.1 B 0 0 0 0 0 152 165 211 0 0 75 82 175 WB 405 544 0 949 33.8 C 12.9 B 0.0 0 21.8 C 22.4 C 0 0 0 0 0 378 269 444 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 365 71 223 659 38.4 D 40.5 D 10.2 B 28.9 C 500 120 230 0 0 1106 172 264 0 0 300 55 141 50th St & NB TH 100 EB 0 688 398 1,086 0.0 0 1.6 A 4.5 A 2.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 951 585 1,536 0.0 0 2.0 A 4.4 A 2.9 A 2.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 171 20 88 0 2 % 25 26 58 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Grange Rd (Signal)EB 0 614 75 689 0.0 0 1.5 A 0.8 A 1.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 171 20 80 0 0 0 0 0 WB 8 1370 0 1,378 10.0 B 6.4 A 0.0 0 6.4 A 8.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 279 138 273 0 0 0 0 0 NB 164 0 131 295 37.3 D 1.8 A 36.8 D 35.6 D 180 97 189 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 85 190 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Dale Rd EB 19 686 40 745 16.6 C 0.9 A 0.5 A 1.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 279 20 74 0 0 0 0 0 WB 12 1357 3 1,372 6.0 A 1.0 A 0.5 A 1.0 A 1.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 342 20 93 0 0 0 0 0 NB 2 0 3 5 98.6 F 0.2 A 5.8 A 19.7 C 0 0 0 0 0 349 20 30 0 0 100 20 26 SB 5 1 20 26 40.4 E 40.2 E 14.6 B 21.8 C 0 0 0 0 0 320 20 37 0 0 50 20 44 50th St & Eden Ave EB 0 690 4 694 0.0 0 0.6 A 0.3 A 0.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 342 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 WB 184 1372 0 1,556 7.1 A 0.7 A 0.0 0 1.4 A 1.7 A 120 46 106 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 200 200 0.0 0 0.5 A 7.5 A 7.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 242 48 126 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Sunnyslope Rd EB 1 888 0 889 54.1 F 0.6 A 0.0 0 0.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 327 20 43 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 1551 5 1,556 0.0 0 1.6 A 2.1 A 1.6 A 1.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 5 5 0.0 0 0.0 0 10.2 B 10.2 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 20 32 Eden Ave & Brookside Ave EB 4 362 0 366 3.4 A 1.0 A 0.0 0 1.0 A 100 20 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 374 3 377 0.0 0 0.7 A 0.5 A 0.7 A 0.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 3 3 0.0 0 0.0 0 3.9 A 3.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 345 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & OLG Entrance EB 2 253 108 363 0.0 0 1.5 A 0.5 A 1.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 142 20 43 0 0 0 0 0 WB 151 324 1 476 6.9 A 2.8 A 0.0 0 4.0 A 4.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 60 132 0 0 0 0 0 NB 53 0 150 203 32.5 D 0.0 0 6.3 A 12.5 B 320 29 105 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 32 102 SB 1 0 0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 51 306 46 403 2.1 A 3.0 A 2.1 A 2.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 28 80 0 0 0 0 0 WB 44 291 102 437 3.1 A 3.9 A 2.9 A 3.6 A 3.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 46 115 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 63 71 16 150 3.8 A 5.3 A 3.8 A 4.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 642 28 72 0 0 0 0 0 SB 26 48 122 196 4.1 A 5.6 A 4.8 A 4.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 296 36 93 0 0 0 0 0 Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100 EB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 56 0 16 72 6.2 A 0.0 0 1.4 A 5.1 A 1.2 A 340 27 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 20 NB 0 251 0 251 0.0 0 0.5 A 0.0 0 0.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 117 0 117 0.0 0 0.1 A 0.0 0 0.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 174 227 0 401 3.6 A 5.0 A 0.0 0 4.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 700 33 112 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 241 97 338 0.0 0 2.4 A 3.4 A 2.6 A 3.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 79 38 111 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 146 0 238 384 3.3 A 2.1 A 3.2 A 3.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 80 37 114 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 10 150 213 373 1.2 A 1.6 A 1.2 A 1.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 79 20 64 0 0 0 0 0 WB 43 140 5 188 2.6 A 4.1 A 3.5 A 3.8 A 2.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 314 23 71 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 193 0 43 236 2.9 A 0.0 0 3.1 A 2.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 432 23 74 0 0 0 0 0 SB 5 0 5 10 2.5 A 0.3 A 2.7 A 0.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 349 20 23 0 0 0 0 0 Grange Rd & NB TH 100 EB 171 0 307 478 12.2 B 0.0 0 2.5 A 6.0 A 320 58 142 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200 20 85 WB 0 0 4 4 0.0 0 0.0 0 4.1 A 4.1 A 3.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 159 20 26 0 0 0 0 0 NB 149 122 2 273 1.9 A 1.0 A 1.3 A 1.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 80 21 84 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 78 5 83 0.0 0 0.4 A 0.6 A 0.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 180 0 20 0 0 0 0 0AM Peak HourVehicle Queing Information (feet) Right Turn Lane Intersection Approach Demand Volumes Delay (s/veh)LOS ByApproach LOS ByIntersection Left Turn Lane Through Lane (s) Eden Avenue 2024 Build 1 Conditions - Realigned Wilson Rd, Mini-Roundabouts at Eden/Grange and Eden/Wilson AM & PM Peak Hours L T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOS Delay(S/Veh)LOS Delay(S/Veh)LOS Storage (feet) 3 Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 % Block Thru (2) ----> % Block Left (2) <---- Link Length(feet) Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 % Block Right (2) ----> % Block Thru (2) <---- Storage (feet) 3 Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 Vehicle Queing Information (feet) Right Turn Lane Intersection Approach Demand Volumes Delay (s/veh)LOS By Approach LOS By Intersection Left Turn Lane Through Lane (s) Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal)EB 2 10 5 17 33.2 C 24.6 C 10.2 B 22.1 C 50 20 23 0 1 % 356 20 58 0 0 0 0 0 WB 221 4 162 387 21.8 C 13.5 B 9.4 A 16.6 B 16.9 B 100 89 147 0 1 % 635 60 225 0 0 0 0 0 NB 2 916 294 1,212 44.3 D 21.7 C 5.9 A 18.0 B 100 20 48 0 25 % 379 186 318 1 %0 250 60 176 SB 107 493 7 607 24.5 C 12.7 B 6.5 A 14.6 B 145 55 132 0 0 792 87 176 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 12 12 12 36 31.7 D 29.8 D 5.5 A 21.1 C 0 0 0 0 0 204 20 57 3 %0 50 20 31 WB 72 12 64 148 28.9 D 31.6 D 13.7 B 22.8 C 5.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 418 50 130 17 % 3 % 50 35 94 NB 9 1008 58 1,075 6.8 A 3.5 A 3.4 A 3.5 A 100 20 20 0 0 792 0 20 0 0 140 0 20 SB 55 456 27 538 12.9 B 1.7 A 1.5 A 2.8 A 100 25 76 0 0 382 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 293 769 37 1,099 44.5 D 18.2 B 16.5 B 25.1 C 150 172 229 0 3 % 382 190 364 3 %0 0 0 0 WB 72 421 376 869 32.7 C 19.5 B 17.7 B 19.8 B 29.7 C 200 48 107 0 0 390 160 300 0 0 0 0 0 NB 29 115 24 168 55.0 E 52.6 D 38.3 D 51.0 D 50 28 100 0 41 % 438 102 240 0 0 0 0 0 SB 427 81 98 606 52.1 D 40.5 D 25.6 C 46.3 D 590 249 554 2 % 1 %0 125 275 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 0 1180 38 1,218 0.0 0 5.6 A 4.3 A 5.6 A 0 0 0 0 2 % 390 76 278 9 %0 0 0 0 WB 0 871 0 871 0.0 0 1.2 A 0.0 0 1.2 A 5.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 186 186 0.0 0 0.7 A 20.5 C 15.2 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 295 79 180 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB 0 914 449 1,363 0.0 0 20.5 C 8.3 A 16.5 B 0 0 0 0 0 152 165 210 0 0 75 79 173 WB 328 515 0 843 40.0 D 16.5 B 0.0 0 25.7 C 25.2 C 0 0 0 0 0 378 238 432 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 655 76 356 1,087 45.5 D 54.8 D 14.1 B 36.0 D 500 229 386 0 0 1106 280 451 6 %0 300 111 367 50th St & NB TH 100 EB 0 1246 322 1,568 0.0 0 2.0 A 4.6 A 2.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 378 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 843 336 1,179 0.0 0 1.3 A 2.5 A 1.6 A 2.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 171 20 20 0 0 25 20 42 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Grange Rd (Signal)EB 0 1162 85 1,247 0.0 0 4.3 A 3.0 A 4.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 171 85 172 0 0 0 0 0 WB 8 897 0 905 22.0 C 7.5 A 0.0 0 7.6 A 11.0 B 0 0 0 0 0 279 116 212 0 0 0 0 0 NB 281 0 198 479 37.7 D 4.2 A 34.2 C 34.3 C 180 152 207 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 107 190 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Dale Rd EB 23 1321 18 1,362 6.2 A 1.4 A 1.2 A 1.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 279 20 62 0 0 0 0 0 WB 6 861 1 868 12.3 B 0.6 A 0.2 A 0.7 A 1.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 342 20 92 0 0 0 0 0 NB 22 0 22 44 62.9 F 0.0 0 12.0 B 36.9 E 0 0 0 0 0 349 21 68 0 0 100 20 45 SB 3 0 23 26 22.1 C 0.0 0 7.6 A 8.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 320 20 27 0 0 50 20 42 50th St & Eden Ave EB 0 1337 8 1,345 0.0 0 0.9 A 0.7 A 0.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 342 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 WB 128 867 0 995 17.2 C 0.4 A 0.0 0 2.5 A 4.6 A 120 55 129 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 244 244 0.0 0 1.0 A 34.8 D 33.7 D 0 0 0 0 0 242 109 273 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Sunnyslope Rd EB 2 1578 0 1,580 7.5 A 0.6 A 0.0 0 0.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 327 20 40 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 993 8 1,001 0.0 0 0.7 A 0.6 A 0.7 A 0.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 8 0 3 11 39.5 E 0.0 0 4.3 A 27.8 D 430 20 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 20 29 Eden Ave & Brookside Ave EB 2 380 0 382 3.6 A 0.8 A 0.0 0 0.8 A 100 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 355 4 359 0.0 0 0.2 A 0.1 A 0.2 A 0.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 15 0 12 27 9.7 A 0.0 0 4.3 A 7.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 345 20 37 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & OLG Entrance EB 1 379 15 395 0.0 0 1.1 A 0.4 A 1.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 142 20 65 0 0 0 0 0 WB 17 345 0 362 3.9 A 0.7 A 0.0 0 0.9 A 1.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 20 77 0 0 0 0 0 NB 12 0 18 30 10.0 B 0.0 0 9.1 A 9.4 A 320 20 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 20 37 SB 4 0 2 6 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 59 291 50 400 3.0 A 4.0 A 3.1 A 3.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 37 87 0 0 0 0 0 WB 49 171 103 323 2.9 A 3.3 A 2.9 A 3.1 A 3.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 31 97 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 79 89 8 176 4.1 A 4.9 A 3.9 A 4.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 642 28 86 0 0 0 0 0 SB 33 112 112 257 3.9 A 4.3 A 3.8 A 4.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 296 32 89 0 0 0 0 0 Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100 EB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 32 0 25 57 6.9 A 0.0 0 1.3 A 4.4 A 0.8 A 340 20 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 224 0 224 0.0 0 0.5 A 0.0 0 0.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 226 0 226 0.0 0 0.2 A 0.0 0 0.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 141 241 0 382 5.0 A 5.2 A 0.0 0 5.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 700 36 136 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 186 168 354 0.0 0 2.2 A 2.2 A 2.2 A 3.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 79 29 99 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 159 0 167 326 3.0 A 1.5 A 2.7 A 2.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 80 26 94 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 10 164 226 400 1.9 A 2.0 A 1.6 A 1.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 79 20 70 0 0 0 0 0 WB 51 80 5 136 3.5 A 4.0 A 2.6 A 3.8 A 2.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 314 20 75 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 254 0 72 326 3.9 A 0.0 0 3.8 A 3.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 432 31 100 0 0 0 0 0 SB 5 0 22 27 3.7 A 0.0 0 3.5 A 3.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 349 20 36 0 0 0 0 0 Grange Rd & NB TH 100 EB 246 0 238 484 17.1 C 0.0 0 2.7 A 10.1 B 320 81 191 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200 20 106 WB 0 0 40 40 0.0 0 0.0 0 6.0 A 6.0 A 6.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 159 20 50 0 0 0 0 0 NB 115 192 2 309 2.4 A 1.6 A 1.2 A 1.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 80 24 91 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 87 5 92 0.0 0 0.4 A 0.3 A 0.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 180 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 NOTES 1. If the reported queue is greater than zero (0), but less than ft, a minimum of ft is reported. 2. Block Percentage is proportion of analysis time (1 hour) the storage lane or through lane is blocked or blocking. 3. Multiple storage lanes of different length are averaged together to show the "Effective Storage Length" per lane.PM Peak Hour Table B3 Eden Avenue 2024 Build 2 Conditions - Realigned Wilson Rd, Realigned Grange Rd, Mini-Roundabouts at Eden/Grange and Eden/Wilson, Signal at 50th/Dale/New Grange AM & PM Peak Hours L T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOS Delay (S/Veh)LOS Delay (S/Veh)LOS Storage (feet) 3 Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 % Block Thru (2) ----> % Block Left (2) <---- Link Length (feet) Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 % Block Right (2) ----> % Block Thru (2) <---- Storage (feet) 3 Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal)EB 6 5 4 15 35.7 D 17.6 B 5.8 A 19.4 B 50 20 32 0 0 356 20 42 0 0 0 0 0 WB 206 2 187 395 19.4 B 14.1 B 8.4 A 14.1 B 20.3 C 100 78 148 0 1 % 635 65 241 0 0 0 0 0 NB 2 619 263 884 56.3 E 30.8 C 6.0 A 23.5 C 100 20 48 0 20 % 379 176 324 2 %0 250 60 163 SB 116 384 11 511 27.8 C 17.6 B 10.8 B 19.7 B 145 65 142 0 1 % 792 92 185 1 %0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 12 4 12 28 21.2 C 19.9 C 5.1 A 13.5 B 0 0 0 0 0 204 20 41 0 0 50 20 39 WB 52 4 60 116 20.9 C 19.8 C 9.9 A 15.0 C 4.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 418 32 80 6 % 3 % 50 30 82 NB 13 719 75 807 5.3 A 3.6 A 3.8 A 3.6 A 100 20 25 0 0 792 20 59 0 0 140 20 35 SB 56 467 29 552 9.4 A 1.4 A 1.4 A 2.2 A 100 22 60 0 0 382 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 178 559 63 800 34.7 C 18.5 B 16.4 B 22.1 C 150 104 222 0 1 % 382 174 376 1 %0 0 0 0 WB 80 380 308 768 28.8 C 13.3 B 11.6 B 14.1 B 22.4 C 200 46 133 0 0 390 109 244 0 0 0 0 0 NB 19 66 13 98 45.4 D 42.9 D 21.4 C 40.2 D 50 20 62 0 22 % 438 58 132 0 0 0 0 0 SB 373 85 161 619 37.5 D 29.3 C 15.8 B 30.4 C 590 185 402 0 1 %0 116 274 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 0 914 31 945 0.0 0 8.8 A 6.3 A 8.7 A 0 0 0 0 4 % 390 112 377 16 %0 0 0 0 WB 0 768 0 768 0.0 0 1.1 A 0.0 0 1.1 A 7.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 192 192 0.0 0 1.3 A 27.5 D 20.0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 295 87 248 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB 0 724 383 1,107 0.0 0 24.3 C 10.2 B 19.6 B 0 0 0 0 0 152 167 220 0 0 75 77 168 WB 405 544 0 949 34.8 C 13.6 B 0.0 0 22.4 C 22.9 C 0 0 0 0 0 378 256 467 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 365 71 223 659 38.3 D 40.8 D 10.4 B 29.2 C 500 123 245 0 0 1106 180 289 0 0 300 55 156 50th St & NB TH 100 EB 0 688 398 1,086 0.0 0 1.5 A 4.3 A 2.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 20 WB 0 951 722 1,673 0.0 0 1.4 A 4.6 A 2.7 A 2.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 177 20 124 0 3 % 25 31 58 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Dale Rd (Signal)EB 19 559 110 688 28.5 C 1.5 A 1.0 A 2.2 A 150 20 57 0 0 275 20 53 0 0 70 20 45 WB 20 1349 3 1,372 12.2 B 9.4 A 4.4 A 9.4 A 9.7 A 150 20 81 0 6 % 341 152 348 6 %0 0 0 0 NB 313 0 134 447 31.4 C 0.7 A 10.0 B 19.1 B 150 96 222 1 %0 344 62 304 0 0 0 0 0 SB 5 1 20 26 40.3 D 44.4 D 17.4 B 22.0 C 0 0 0 0 0 311 20 39 0 0 100 20 63 50th St & Eden Ave EB 0 690 4 694 0.0 0 0.7 A 0.5 A 0.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 341 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 WB 184 1372 0 1,556 7.5 A 1.0 A 0.0 0 1.7 A 1.9 A 120 48 112 0 0 327 20 80 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 200 200 0.0 0 0.4 A 7.5 A 7.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 242 50 112 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Sunnyslope Rd EB 1 888 0 889 16.4 C 0.4 A 0.0 0 0.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 327 20 35 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 1551 5 1,556 0.0 0 1.5 A 1.7 A 1.5 A 1.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 5 5 0.0 0 0.0 0 10.3 B 10.3 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 20 33 Eden Ave & Brookside Ave EB 4 362 0 366 3.3 A 1.0 A 0.0 0 1.0 A 100 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 374 3 377 0.0 0 0.7 A 0.5 A 0.7 A 0.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 3 3 0.0 0 0.0 0 3.2 A 3.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 345 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & OLG Entrance EB 2 253 108 363 0.0 0 1.4 A 0.5 A 1.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 142 20 50 0 0 0 0 0 WB 151 324 1 476 6.5 A 2.6 A 0.0 0 3.9 A 5.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 62 132 0 0 0 0 0 NB 53 0 150 203 39.9 E 0.0 0 8.6 A 16.1 C 320 34 142 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 % 100 35 124 SB 1 0 0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 51 306 46 403 2.2 A 3.1 A 2.1 A 2.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 28 84 0 0 0 0 0 WB 44 291 102 437 3.1 A 4.0 A 3.1 A 3.7 A 3.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 42 114 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 63 71 16 150 4.2 A 5.7 A 4.7 A 5.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 642 29 94 0 0 0 0 0 SB 26 48 122 196 4.5 A 5.0 A 4.6 A 4.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 296 36 98 0 0 0 0 0 Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100 EB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 56 0 16 72 6.7 A 0.0 0 1.5 A 5.5 A 1.2 A 340 29 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 251 0 251 0.0 0 0.5 A 0.0 0 0.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 296 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 117 0 117 0.0 0 0.2 A 0.0 0 0.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 0 401 0 401 0.0 0 5.6 A 0.0 0 5.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 700 46 154 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 241 0 241 0.0 0 1.9 A 0.0 0 1.9 A 5.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 79 20 22 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 240 0 238 478 6.4 A 0.0 0 6.1 A 6.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 467 64 176 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 355 152 135 642 3.4 A 3.1 A 3.2 A 3.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 79 65 137 0 0 0 0 0 WB 43 137 8 188 5.0 A 6.2 A 3.4 A 5.8 A 4.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 314 39 99 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 99 94 43 236 5.9 A 6.6 A 5.5 A 6.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 432 44 115 0 0 0 0 0 SB 5 78 5 88 2.7 A 2.8 A 2.5 A 2.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 344 20 54 0 0 0 0 0AM Peak HourVehicle Queing Information (feet) Right Turn Lane Intersection Approach Demand Volumes Delay (s/veh)LOS ByApproach LOS ByIntersection Left Turn Lane Through Lane (s) Eden Avenue 2024 Build 2 Conditions - Realigned Wilson Rd, Realigned Grange Rd, Mini-Roundabouts at Eden/Grange and Eden/Wilson, Signal at 50th/Dale/New Grange AM & PM Peak Hours L T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOS Delay (S/Veh)LOS Delay (S/Veh)LOS Storage (feet) 3 Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 % Block Thru (2) ----> % Block Left (2) <---- Link Length (feet) Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 % Block Right (2) ----> % Block Thru (2) <---- Storage (feet) 3 Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 Vehicle Queing Information (feet) Right Turn Lane Intersection Approach Demand Volumes Delay (s/veh)LOS ByApproach LOS ByIntersection Left Turn Lane Through Lane (s) Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal)EB 2 10 5 17 32.5 C 24.5 C 5.8 A 17.9 B 50 20 23 0 0 356 20 37 0 0 0 0 0 WB 221 4 162 387 22.5 C 16.4 B 9.1 A 16.9 B 17.1 B 100 90 148 0 1 % 635 61 240 0 0 0 0 0 NB 2 916 294 1,212 47.0 D 22.4 C 5.5 A 18.4 B 100 20 44 0 27 % 379 190 337 2 %0 250 57 175 SB 107 493 7 607 24.4 C 12.7 B 11.9 B 14.6 B 145 52 120 0 1 % 792 86 184 1 %0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 12 12 12 36 25.5 D 27.8 D 6.0 A 20.7 C 0 0 0 0 0 204 21 60 3 %0 50 20 33 WB 72 12 64 148 32.0 D 36.1 E 15.1 C 25.1 D 5.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 418 57 145 20 % 5 % 50 36 99 NB 9 1008 58 1,075 6.6 A 3.7 A 3.5 A 3.7 A 100 20 20 0 0 792 20 20 0 0 140 0 20 SB 55 456 27 538 14.0 B 1.9 A 1.7 A 3.1 A 100 24 76 0 0 382 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 293 769 37 1,099 39.6 D 19.2 B 15.7 B 24.4 C 150 153 229 0 3 % 382 204 370 3 %0 0 0 0 WB 72 421 376 869 31.2 C 24.2 C 22.3 C 23.9 C 31.5 C 200 52 158 0 2 % 390 228 401 2 %0 0 0 0 NB 29 115 24 168 71.8 E 55.3 E 47.1 D 57.0 E 50 33 100 0 46 % 438 115 265 0 0 0 0 0 SB 427 81 98 606 56.2 E 37.5 D 24.2 C 48.7 D 590 254 528 3 % 1 %0 129 275 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 0 1180 38 1,218 0.0 0 5.3 A 3.9 A 5.3 A 0 0 0 0 2 % 390 64 245 7 %0 0 0 0 WB 0 871 0 871 0.0 0 1.2 A 0.0 0 1.2 A 5.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 186 186 0.0 0 0.8 A 23.5 C 17.2 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 295 83 195 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB 0 914 449 1,363 0.0 0 20.0 C 8.3 A 16.2 B 0 0 0 0 0 152 161 203 0 0 75 77 159 WB 328 515 0 843 43.0 D 16.5 B 0.0 0 26.6 C 25.4 C 0 0 0 0 0 378 245 459 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 655 76 356 1,087 45.8 D 54.6 D 15.5 B 36.2 D 500 233 379 0 0 1106 283 474 6 %0 300 119 372 50th St & NB TH 100 EB 0 1246 322 1,568 0.0 0 1.8 A 4.1 A 2.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 843 462 1,305 0.0 0 0.8 A 2.3 A 1.3 A 1.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 177 20 55 0 0 25 20 44 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Dale Rd (Signal)EB 23 1125 98 1,246 13.9 B 2.6 A 1.4 A 2.7 A 150 20 53 0 0 275 33 117 1 %0 70 20 55 WB 14 852 1 867 27.7 C 7.6 A 4.5 A 7.9 A 9.7 A 150 20 47 0 1 % 341 108 215 1 %0 0 0 0 NB 396 0 220 616 34.0 C 0.0 0 13.8 B 26.5 C 150 128 214 0 0 344 78 230 0 0 0 0 0 SB 3 0 23 26 74.0 E 0.0 0 10.3 B 15.6 B 0 0 0 0 0 311 20 33 0 0 100 20 48 50th St & Eden Ave EB 0 1337 8 1,345 0.0 0 1.1 A 1.1 A 1.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 341 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 WB 128 867 0 995 20.2 C 0.4 A 0.0 0 2.9 A 4.7 A 120 58 135 0 0 327 20 69 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 244 244 0.0 0 1.0 A 33.1 D 31.8 D 0 0 0 0 0 242 107 255 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Sunnyslope Rd EB 2 1578 0 1,580 9.8 A 0.6 A 0.0 0 0.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 327 20 25 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 993 8 1,001 0.0 0 0.7 A 0.5 A 0.7 A 0.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 8 0 3 11 29.0 D 0.0 0 4.5 A 21.7 C 430 20 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 20 29 Eden Ave & Brookside Ave EB 2 380 0 382 4.5 A 0.8 A 0.0 0 0.8 A 100 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 355 4 359 0.0 0 0.2 A 0.1 A 0.2 A 0.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 142 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 15 0 12 27 8.8 A 0.0 0 3.0 A 6.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 345 20 30 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & OLG Entrance EB 1 379 15 395 0.0 0 0.9 A 0.2 A 0.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 142 20 51 0 0 0 0 0 WB 17 345 0 362 4.2 A 0.7 A 0.0 0 0.9 A 1.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 20 77 0 0 0 0 0 NB 12 0 18 30 12.9 B 0.0 0 4.6 A 7.8 A 320 20 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 20 31 SB 4 0 2 6 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 59 291 50 400 2.9 A 3.7 A 2.9 A 3.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 35 80 0 0 0 0 0 WB 49 171 103 323 2.7 A 3.0 A 2.6 A 2.8 A 3.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 32 82 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 79 89 8 176 4.2 A 4.8 A 4.0 A 4.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 642 27 76 0 0 0 0 0 SB 33 112 112 257 3.8 A 4.3 A 3.8 A 4.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 296 32 86 0 0 0 0 0 Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100 EB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 32 0 25 57 6.8 A 0.0 0 1.3 A 4.2 A 0.8 A 340 20 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 224 0 224 0.0 0 0.5 A 0.0 0 0.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 226 0 226 0.0 0 0.2 A 0.0 0 0.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 0 382 0 382 0.0 0 13.8 B 0.0 0 13.8 B 0 0 0 0 0 700 71 299 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 188 0 188 0.0 0 2.2 A 0.0 0 2.2 A 8.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 79 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 317 0 167 484 7.0 A 0.0 0 6.0 A 6.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 467 61 222 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 397 167 139 703 6.5 A 6.0 A 5.8 A 6.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 79 79 139 0 0 0 0 0 WB 51 70 15 136 4.9 A 6.0 A 5.1 A 5.5 A 5.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 314 34 96 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 96 158 72 326 5.7 A 6.7 A 5.5 A 6.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 432 51 120 0 0 0 0 0 SB 5 87 22 114 2.6 A 3.8 A 2.9 A 3.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 344 20 58 0 0 0 0 0 NOTES 1. If the reported queue is greater than zero (0), but less than ft, a minimum of ft is reported. 2. Block Percentage is proportion of analysis time (1 hour) the storage lane or through lane is blocked or blocking. 3. Multiple storage lanes of different length are averaged together to show the "Effective Storage Length" per lane.PM Peak Hour Table B4 Eden Avenue 2040 No Build Conditions AM & PM Peak Hours L T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOS Delay (S/Veh)LOS Delay (S/Veh)LOS Storage (feet) 3 Avg.Queue (feet) 1 MaxQueue (feet) 1 % Block Thru (2) ----> % Block Left (2) <---- Link Length(feet) Avg.Queue (feet) 1 MaxQueue (feet) 1 % Block Right (2) ----> % Block Thru (2) <---- Storage (feet) 3 Avg.Queue (feet) 1 MaxQueue (feet) 1 Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal)EB 6 5 4 15 27.1 C 22.8 C 3.8 A 19.2 B 50 20 34 0 0 356 20 39 0 0 0 0 0 WB 215 2 197 414 20.4 C 13.2 B 9.5 A 15.1 B 20.6 C 100 86 148 0 2 % 635 72 216 0 0 0 0 0 NB 2 649 274 925 75.5 E 31.5 C 6.3 A 24.0 C 100 20 30 0 22 % 379 188 363 3 %0 250 66 256 SB 123 402 11 536 27.9 C 16.9 B 13.9 B 19.2 B 145 64 145 0 1 % 792 90 180 1 %0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 12 4 12 28 24.0 C 13.6 B 5.0 A 14.4 B 0 0 0 0 0 204 20 48 1 %0 50 20 38 WB 56 4 64 124 22.1 C 26.7 D 11.6 B 16.7 C 4.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 418 36 88 6 % 3 % 50 31 80 NB 13 756 79 848 5.6 A 3.4 A 3.7 A 3.5 A 100 20 23 0 0 792 20 46 0 0 140 20 20 SB 60 490 31 581 10.3 B 1.4 A 1.4 A 2.3 A 100 23 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 186 587 67 840 40.2 D 20.5 C 19.7 B 24.8 C 150 108 206 0 1 % 382 198 389 1 %0 0 0 0 WB 85 397 322 804 27.1 C 14.7 B 13.6 B 15.5 B 24.2 C 200 47 125 0 0 390 123 269 0 0 0 0 0 NB 19 70 13 102 44.6 D 44.7 D 26.3 C 42.1 D 50 20 76 0 25 % 438 62 133 0 0 0 0 0 SB 391 89 170 650 38.1 D 29.7 C 17.9 B 31.5 C 590 191 396 1 % 1 %0 125 263 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 0 959 35 994 0.0 0 10.1 B 7.4 A 10.0 B 0 0 0 0 6 % 390 131 365 19 %0 0 0 0 WB 0 803 0 803 0.0 0 1.1 A 0.0 0 1.1 A 10.8 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 198 198 0.0 0 8.8 A 54.9 F 41.0 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 295 134 349 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB 0 755 401 1,156 0.0 0 25.4 C 12.7 B 21.1 C 0 0 0 0 0 152 171 213 0 0 75 94 184 WB 424 570 0 994 49.4 D 16.7 B 0.0 0 30.7 C 26.7 C 0 0 0 0 0 378 333 487 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 381 73 234 688 39.2 D 43.0 D 10.9 B 30.0 C 500 130 253 0 0 1106 179 290 0 0 300 58 139 50th St & NB TH 100 EB 0 722 415 1,137 0.0 0 1.7 A 4.6 A 2.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 993 612 1,605 0.0 0 4.2 A 5.2 A 4.6 A 3.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 171 27 175 1 % 2 % 25 27 57 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Grange Rd (Signal)EB 0 644 79 723 0.0 0 1.6 A 1.0 A 1.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 171 20 69 0 0 0 0 0 WB 8 1436 0 1,444 13.0 B 8.0 A 0.0 0 8.0 A 9.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 279 149 281 0 0 0 0 0 NB 171 0 137 308 38.6 D 1.9 A 35.9 D 36.1 D 180 105 192 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 86 179 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Dale Rd EB 19 718 44 781 20.1 C 0.9 A 0.6 A 1.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 279 20 80 0 0 0 0 0 WB 12 1422 3 1,437 9.2 A 1.9 A 0.4 A 1.9 A 2.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 342 20 122 0 0 0 0 0 NB 2 0 3 5 130.8 F 0.2 A 6.5 A 19.8 C 0 0 0 0 0 370 20 23 0 0 100 20 26 SB 5 1 20 26 63.9 F 104.3 F 35.0 E 42.1 E 0 0 0 0 0 320 20 57 2 % 4 % 50 20 59 50th St & Eden Ave EB 0 722 4 726 0.0 0 0.6 A 0.5 A 0.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 342 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 WB 192 1437 0 1,629 7.7 A 0.9 A 0.0 0 1.7 A 1.9 A 120 52 103 0 0 327 20 38 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 207 207 0.0 0 0.7 A 7.7 A 7.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 242 47 116 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Sunnyslope Rd EB 1 929 0 930 0.0 A 0.5 A 0.0 0 0.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 327 20 39 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 1623 5 1,628 0.0 0 1.7 A 2.2 A 1.7 A 1.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 5 5 0.0 0 0.0 0 13.4 B 13.4 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 20 32 Eden Ave & Brookside Ave EB 4 380 0 384 4.4 A 1.0 A 0.0 0 1.0 A 100 20 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 392 3 395 0.0 0 0.7 A 0.4 A 0.7 A 0.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 3 3 0.0 0 0.0 0 3.9 A 3.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 345 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & OLG Entrance EB 2 263 115 380 0.0 0 1.5 A 0.6 A 1.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 142 20 61 0 0 0 0 0 WB 160 338 1 499 7.1 A 3.1 A 0.0 0 4.4 A 4.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 65 132 0 0 0 0 0 NB 56 0 160 216 31.4 D 0.0 0 6.9 A 12.8 B 320 30 94 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 % 100 35 116 SB 1 0 0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 54 320 49 423 2.2 A 3.2 A 2.2 A 3.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 34 80 0 0 0 0 0 WB 47 304 106 457 3.1 A 4.1 A 3.2 A 3.8 A 4.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 47 136 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 67 75 16 158 4.1 A 5.4 A 4.4 A 4.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 642 33 89 0 0 0 0 0 SB 26 51 129 206 5.4 A 6.7 A 5.4 A 5.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 296 42 129 0 0 0 0 0 Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100 EB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 59 0 16 75 6.8 A 0.0 0 1.3 A 5.5 A 1.9 A 340 30 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 263 0 263 0.0 0 1.6 A 0.0 0 1.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 296 20 52 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 123 0 123 0.0 0 0.2 A 0.0 0 0.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 182 130 106 418 8.1 A 9.6 A 5.2 A 7.8 A 100 46 84 0 0 767 49 112 0 0 0 0 0 WB 44 150 3 197 6.7 A 8.2 A 3.9 A 7.8 A 7.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 42 36 56 0 0 0 0 0 NB 100 99 45 244 8.8 A 10.2 B 4.5 A 8.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 432 45 114 4 %0 50 21 54 SB 37 118 248 403 7.7 A 8.2 A 5.5 A 6.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 91 51 153 2 %0 75 20 115 Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 10 203 0 213 2.8 A 1.7 A 0.0 0 1.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 42 20 32 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 191 5 196 0.0 0 1.9 A 0.6 A 1.9 A 1.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 329 20 59 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 5 0 5 10 7.0 A 0.3 A 6.1 A 1.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 370 20 28 0 0 0 0 0 Grange Rd & NB TH 100 EB 179 0 321 500 13.4 B 0.0 0 3.6 A 7.2 A 320 60 148 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200 30 109 WB 0 0 4 4 0.0 0 0.0 0 3.1 A 3.1 A 4.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 125 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 NB 155 126 2 283 2.9 A 2.0 A 0.7 A 2.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 91 20 44 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 81 5 86 0.0 0 0.5 A 0.2 A 0.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 182 20 20 0 0 0 0 0AM Peak HourVehicle Queing Information (feet) Right Turn Lane Intersection Approach Demand Volumes Delay (s/veh)LOS ByApproach LOS ByIntersection Left Turn Lane Through Lane (s) Eden Avenue 2040 No Build Conditions AM & PM Peak Hours L T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOS Delay(S/Veh)LOS Delay(S/Veh)LOS Storage (feet) 3 Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 % Block Thru (2) ----> % Block Left (2) <---- Link Length(feet) Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 % Block Right (2) ----> % Block Thru (2) <---- Storage (feet) 3 Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 Vehicle Queing Information (feet) Right Turn Lane Intersection Approach Demand Volumes Delay (s/veh)LOS By Approach LOS By Intersection Left Turn Lane Through Lane (s) Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal)EB 2 11 5 18 30.4 C 25.0 C 6.2 A 19.3 B 50 20 25 0 1 % 356 20 45 0 0 0 0 0 WB 231 4 170 405 23.7 C 21.5 C 11.8 B 18.6 B 17.8 B 100 95 149 0 1 % 635 83 256 0 0 0 0 0 NB 2 957 308 1,267 52.8 D 22.9 C 6.1 A 18.9 B 100 20 83 0 29 % 379 202 358 3 %0 250 66 208 SB 112 517 7 636 26.8 C 12.6 B 10.8 B 15.1 B 145 62 154 0 1 % 792 92 185 1 %0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 12 12 12 36 28.9 D 32.1 D 5.0 A 21.7 C 0 0 0 0 0 204 20 49 1 %0 50 20 33 WB 76 12 68 156 39.2 E 36.8 E 17.9 C 29.6 D 6.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 418 60 162 22 % 6 % 50 41 98 NB 9 1056 62 1,127 6.9 A 3.9 A 3.6 A 3.9 A 100 20 22 0 0 792 20 152 0 0 140 0 20 SB 59 478 30 567 15.0 C 1.8 A 1.8 A 3.1 A 100 27 74 0 0 382 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 305 804 39 1,148 54.6 D 21.5 C 18.2 B 30.2 C 150 184 230 0 4 % 382 237 394 4 %0 0 0 0 WB 76 441 394 911 36.7 D 20.5 C 20.0 C 21.6 C 34.4 C 200 53 122 0 0 390 175 337 0 0 0 0 0 NB 30 122 24 176 59.2 E 50.6 D 41.0 D 50.7 D 50 32 100 0 45 % 438 109 245 0 0 0 0 0 SB 446 84 104 634 63.4 E 43.9 D 31.8 C 55.9 E 590 303 729 6 % 1 %0 137 275 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 0 1236 41 1,277 0.0 0 7.2 A 5.1 A 7.1 A 0 0 0 0 3 % 390 104 335 13 %0 0 0 0 WB 0 910 0 910 0.0 0 1.2 A 0.0 0 1.2 A 6.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 190 190 0.0 0 0.7 A 25.6 D 18.3 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 295 85 190 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB 0 957 471 1,428 0.0 0 21.2 C 9.8 A 17.4 B 0 0 0 0 0 152 168 206 0 0 75 91 169 WB 344 539 0 883 52.8 D 18.9 B 0.0 0 32.1 C 28.4 C 0 0 0 0 0 378 284 488 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 684 79 372 1,135 50.3 D 60.1 E 16.2 B 39.7 D 500 252 458 0 0 1106 300 525 10 %0 300 134 398 50th St & NB TH 100 EB 0 1306 335 1,641 0.0 0 2.1 A 4.7 A 2.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 881 351 1,232 0.0 0 2.6 A 2.8 A 2.7 A 2.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 171 20 83 0 0 25 20 40 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Grange Rd (Signal)EB 0 1218 88 1,306 0.0 0 4.0 A 3.1 A 3.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 171 83 183 0 0 0 0 0 WB 8 940 0 948 25.0 C 8.3 A 0.0 0 8.5 A 11.5 B 0 0 0 0 0 279 123 223 0 0 0 0 0 NB 293 0 208 501 39.4 D 4.3 A 35.8 D 35.8 D 180 158 206 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 119 208 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Dale Rd EB 23 1382 18 1,423 6.5 A 1.4 A 1.3 A 1.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 279 20 76 0 0 70 0 20 WB 6 900 1 907 11.9 B 0.6 A 0.1 A 0.6 A 2.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 342 20 80 0 0 0 0 0 NB 22 0 22 44 70.7 F 0.0 0 12.5 B 40.3 E 0 0 0 0 0 370 23 70 1 %0 100 20 51 SB 3 0 23 26 35.6 E 0.0 0 6.6 A 11.2 B 0 0 0 0 0 320 20 36 0 0 50 20 41 50th St & Eden Ave EB 0 1400 8 1,408 0.0 0 1.0 A 0.8 A 1.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 342 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 WB 134 907 0 1,041 19.9 C 0.4 A 0.0 0 3.0 A 7.5 A 120 61 137 0 0 327 20 69 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 254 254 0.0 0 0.0 0 65.1 F 65.1 F 0 0 0 0 0 242 156 331 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Sunnyslope Rd EB 2 1653 0 1,655 12.3 B 0.7 A 0.0 0 0.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 327 20 42 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 1037 8 1,045 0.0 0 0.8 A 0.9 A 0.8 A 0.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 8 0 3 11 32.1 D 0.0 0 6.1 A 23.4 C 430 20 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 20 26 Eden Ave & Brookside Ave EB 2 395 0 397 4.8 A 0.8 A 0.0 0 0.8 A 100 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 371 4 375 0.0 0 0.2 A 0.1 A 0.2 A 0.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 15 0 12 27 11.6 B 0.0 0 4.1 A 8.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 345 20 46 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & OLG Entrance EB 1 395 15 411 0.0 0 1.0 A 0.2 A 1.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 142 20 50 0 0 0 0 0 WB 17 361 0 378 3.8 A 0.8 A 0.0 0 0.9 A 1.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 20 86 0 0 0 0 0 NB 12 0 18 30 11.4 B 0.0 0 7.6 A 9.0 A 320 20 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 20 26 SB 4 0 2 6 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 60 305 53 418 3.1 A 3.7 A 3.3 A 3.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 36 83 0 0 0 0 0 WB 52 180 104 336 2.9 A 3.3 A 2.9 A 3.1 A 3.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 33 96 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 85 94 8 187 4.4 A 4.9 A 4.1 A 4.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 642 29 85 0 0 0 0 0 SB 33 116 117 266 3.8 A 4.2 A 3.7 A 3.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 296 31 79 0 0 0 0 0 Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100 EB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 32 0 25 57 6.6 A 0.0 0 1.3 A 4.2 A 0.7 A 340 20 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 20 NB 0 232 0 232 0.0 0 0.5 A 0.0 0 0.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 237 0 237 0.0 0 0.1 A 0.0 0 0.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 146 148 104 398 9.9 A 13.7 B 8.8 A 11.0 B 100 46 126 0 4 % 767 64 178 0 0 0 0 0 WB 55 94 11 160 8.1 A 8.5 A 3.9 A 8.1 A 9.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 42 34 63 0 0 0 0 0 NB 98 166 76 340 10.2 B 11.1 B 5.9 A 9.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 432 54 115 8 % 1 % 50 30 89 SB 35 130 173 338 9.5 A 9.9 A 4.7 A 7.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 91 51 148 3 %0 75 20 112 Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 10 248 0 258 2.7 A 2.0 A 0.0 0 2.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 42 20 45 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 136 5 141 0.0 0 2.4 A 0.3 A 2.3 A 2.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 329 20 81 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 5 0 22 27 6.7 A 0.0 0 4.9 A 5.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 370 20 30 0 0 0 0 0 Grange Rd & NB TH 100 EB 258 0 247 505 21.3 C 0.0 0 4.2 A 12.8 B 320 95 225 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200 31 163 WB 0 0 43 43 0.0 0 0.0 0 7.1 A 7.1 A 8.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 125 20 49 0 0 0 0 0 NB 121 202 2 325 3.5 A 2.8 A 1.3 A 3.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 91 20 49 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 91 5 96 0.0 0 0.5 A 0.3 A 0.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 182 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 NOTES 1. If the reported queue is greater than zero (0), but less than ft, a minimum of ft is reported. 2. Block Percentage is proportion of analysis time (1 hour) the storage lane or through lane is blocked or blocking. 3. Multiple storage lanes of different length are averaged together to show the "Effective Storage Length" per lane.PM Peak Hour Table B5 Eden Avenue 2040 Build 1 Conditions - Realigned Wilson Rd, Mini-Roundabouts at Eden/Grange and Eden/Wilson AM & PM Peak Hours L T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOS Delay (S/Veh)LOS Delay (S/Veh)LOS Storage (feet) 3 Avg.Queue (feet) 1 MaxQueue (feet) 1 % Block Thru (2) ----> % Block Left (2) <---- Link Length(feet) Avg.Queue (feet) 1 MaxQueue (feet) 1 % Block Right (2) ----> % Block Thru (2) <---- Storage (feet) 3 Avg.Queue (feet) 1 MaxQueue (feet) 1 Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal)EB 6 5 4 15 27.7 C 16.6 B 3.4 A 17.5 B 50 20 35 0 0 356 20 37 0 0 0 0 0 WB 215 2 197 414 20.4 C 17.0 B 8.8 A 14.8 B 21.4 C 100 86 148 0 1 % 635 72 230 0 0 0 0 0 NB 2 649 274 925 69.8 E 32.8 C 6.4 A 24.8 C 100 20 24 0 25 % 379 191 326 3 %0 250 64 226 SB 123 402 11 536 30.6 C 17.9 B 17.3 B 20.7 C 145 69 160 0 1 % 792 94 188 1 %0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 12 4 12 28 26.1 D 24.4 C 4.7 A 15.9 C 0 0 0 0 0 204 20 46 0 0 50 20 33 WB 56 4 64 124 26.5 D 24.0 C 16.7 C 21.4 C 4.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 418 41 131 9 % 5 % 50 33 90 NB 13 756 79 848 7.1 A 3.8 A 3.7 A 3.8 A 100 20 28 0 0 792 20 76 0 0 140 0 20 SB 60 490 31 581 10.4 B 1.4 A 1.4 A 2.4 A 100 24 76 0 0 382 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 186 587 67 840 38.8 D 24.8 C 22.4 C 27.7 C 150 108 219 0 2 % 382 207 383 2 %0 0 0 0 WB 85 397 322 804 32.4 C 15.2 B 13.6 B 16.4 B 25.5 C 200 55 140 0 0 390 117 267 0 0 0 0 0 NB 19 70 13 102 46.2 D 42.9 D 23.8 C 41.0 D 50 22 81 0 21 % 438 59 132 0 0 0 0 0 SB 391 89 170 650 37.8 D 29.4 C 18.9 B 31.6 C 590 198 425 0 2 %0 131 273 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 0 959 35 994 0.0 0 12.1 B 8.7 A 12.0 B 0 0 0 0 7 % 390 154 386 24 %0 0 0 0 WB 0 803 0 803 0.0 0 1.2 A 0.0 0 1.2 A 11.6 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 198 198 0.0 0 2.7 A 56.0 F 40.4 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 295 132 346 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB 0 755 401 1,156 0.0 0 26.6 C 12.3 B 21.6 C 0 0 0 0 0 152 172 212 0 0 75 95 182 WB 424 570 0 994 40.3 D 14.8 B 0.0 0 25.6 C 25.1 C 0 0 0 0 0 378 304 488 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 381 73 234 688 38.8 D 44.2 D 11.3 B 30.1 C 500 130 273 0 0 1106 181 297 0 0 300 60 175 50th St & NB TH 100 EB 0 722 415 1,137 0.0 0 1.6 A 4.7 A 2.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 993 612 1,605 0.0 0 2.4 A 4.6 A 3.2 A 3.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 171 20 98 0 2 % 25 25 58 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Grange Rd (Signal)EB 0 644 79 723 0.0 0 1.5 A 1.0 A 1.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 171 20 61 0 0 0 0 0 WB 8 1436 0 1,444 12.0 B 6.7 A 0.0 0 6.7 A 9.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 279 136 284 0 0 0 0 0 NB 171 0 137 308 38.4 D 1.6 A 37.7 D 36.3 D 180 99 198 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 84 181 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Dale Rd EB 19 718 44 781 16.5 C 0.8 A 0.6 A 1.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 279 20 76 0 0 70 0 20 WB 12 1422 3 1,437 6.5 A 1.2 A 0.4 A 1.3 A 1.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 342 20 94 0 0 0 0 0 NB 2 0 3 5 80.4 F 0.3 A 6.3 A 12.6 B 0 0 0 0 0 349 20 30 0 0 100 20 23 SB 5 1 20 26 54.3 F 91.0 F 20.3 C 28.3 D 0 0 0 0 0 320 20 37 1 % 2 % 50 20 53 50th St & Eden Ave EB 0 722 4 726 0.0 0 0.6 A 0.4 A 0.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 342 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 WB 192 1437 0 1,629 7.4 A 0.7 A 0.0 0 1.5 A 1.8 A 120 50 122 0 0 327 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 207 207 0.0 0 0.5 A 7.9 A 7.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 242 54 131 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Sunnyslope Rd EB 1 929 0 930 25.3 D 0.4 A 0.0 0 0.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 327 20 33 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 1623 5 1,628 0.0 0 1.6 A 1.4 A 1.6 A 1.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 5 5 0.0 0 0.0 0 9.6 A 9.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 20 29 Eden Ave & Brookside Ave EB 4 380 0 384 3.9 A 1.0 A 0.0 0 1.0 A 100 20 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 392 3 395 0.0 0 0.8 A 0.4 A 0.8 A 0.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 3 3 0.0 0 0.0 0 4.1 A 4.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 345 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & OLG Entrance EB 2 263 115 380 0.0 0 1.6 A 0.6 A 1.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 142 20 69 0 0 0 0 0 WB 160 338 1 499 8.2 A 3.5 A 0.0 0 5.0 A 5.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 70 137 0 0 0 0 0 NB 56 0 160 216 44.6 E 0.0 0 7.8 A 16.6 C 320 36 142 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 % 100 37 123 SB 1 0 0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 54 320 49 423 2.1 A 3.1 A 2.2 A 2.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 31 85 0 0 0 0 0 WB 47 304 106 457 5.3 A 5.3 A 4.2 A 5.1 A 4.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 52 139 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 67 75 16 158 3.9 A 5.2 A 4.7 A 4.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 642 31 75 0 0 0 0 0 SB 26 51 129 206 6.2 A 7.1 A 6.5 A 6.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 296 42 137 0 0 0 0 0 Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100 EB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 59 0 16 75 6.4 A 0.0 0 1.4 A 5.2 A 1.2 A 340 28 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 263 0 263 0.0 0 0.6 A 0.0 0 0.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 296 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 123 0 123 0.0 0 0.2 A 0.0 0 0.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 182 236 0 418 3.8 A 5.4 A 0.0 0 4.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 700 39 129 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 250 102 352 0.0 0 2.6 A 3.7 A 2.9 A 3.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 79 44 114 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 155 0 248 403 3.7 A 1.7 A 3.7 A 3.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 80 44 124 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 10 157 224 391 1.1 A 1.7 A 1.3 A 1.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 79 20 80 0 0 0 0 0 WB 44 147 5 196 2.9 A 4.3 A 2.7 A 3.9 A 2.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 314 22 75 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 199 0 45 244 3.2 A 0.0 0 3.2 A 3.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 432 27 82 0 0 0 0 0 SB 5 0 5 10 3.1 A 0.3 A 2.8 A 0.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 349 20 33 0 0 0 0 0 Grange Rd & NB TH 100 EB 179 0 321 500 12.5 B 0.0 0 2.7 A 6.1 A 320 58 128 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200 20 113 WB 0 0 4 4 0.0 0 0.0 0 3.5 A 3.5 A 3.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 159 20 26 0 0 0 0 0 NB 155 126 2 283 2.1 A 0.9 A 0.4 A 1.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 80 23 78 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 81 5 86 0.0 0 0.4 A 0.3 A 0.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 180 0 20 0 0 0 0 0AM Peak HourVehicle Queing Information (feet) Right Turn Lane Intersection Approach Demand Volumes Delay (s/veh)LOS ByApproach LOS ByIntersection Left Turn Lane Through Lane (s) Eden Avenue 2040 Build 1 Conditions - Realigned Wilson Rd, Mini-Roundabouts at Eden/Grange and Eden/Wilson AM & PM Peak Hours L T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOS Delay(S/Veh)LOS Delay(S/Veh)LOS Storage (feet) 3 Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 % Block Thru (2) ----> % Block Left (2) <---- Link Length(feet) Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 % Block Right (2) ----> % Block Thru (2) <---- Storage (feet) 3 Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 Vehicle Queing Information (feet) Right Turn Lane Intersection Approach Demand Volumes Delay (s/veh)LOS By Approach LOS By Intersection Left Turn Lane Through Lane (s) Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal)EB 2 11 5 18 26.9 C 22.6 C 6.7 A 18.9 B 50 20 30 0 1 % 356 20 50 0 0 0 0 0 WB 231 4 170 405 23.5 C 20.5 C 10.1 B 17.6 B 17.8 B 100 93 149 0 1 % 635 73 267 0 0 0 0 0 NB 2 957 308 1,267 48.9 D 23.1 C 6.2 A 19.0 B 100 20 41 0 29 % 379 199 352 2 %0 250 72 313 SB 112 517 7 636 24.9 C 13.5 B 10.9 B 15.5 B 145 59 125 0 1 % 792 92 192 1 %0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 12 12 12 36 25.8 D 37.6 E 5.2 A 22.2 C 0 0 0 0 0 204 21 63 2 %0 50 20 34 WB 76 12 68 156 35.6 E 38.9 E 15.6 C 26.3 D 5.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 418 54 159 20 % 6 % 50 41 97 NB 9 1056 62 1,127 7.4 A 3.7 A 3.8 A 3.7 A 100 20 23 0 0 792 20 41 0 0 140 0 20 SB 59 478 30 567 17.0 C 1.8 A 1.6 A 3.3 A 100 29 85 0 0 382 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 305 804 39 1,148 47.6 D 20.3 C 19.1 B 27.4 C 150 173 230 0 4 % 382 215 396 4 %0 0 0 0 WB 76 441 394 911 36.1 D 20.8 C 20.1 C 21.7 C 30.8 C 200 53 169 0 1 % 390 174 345 1 %0 0 0 0 NB 30 122 24 176 61.7 E 47.8 D 39.2 D 48.8 D 50 30 100 0 41 % 438 106 258 0 0 0 0 0 SB 446 84 104 634 53.4 D 35.7 D 21.3 C 45.6 D 590 252 567 2 %0 0 126 275 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 0 1236 41 1,277 0.0 0 6.7 A 5.4 A 6.7 A 0 0 0 0 3 % 390 106 338 12 %0 0 0 0 WB 0 910 0 910 0.0 0 1.2 A 0.0 0 1.2 A 6.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 152 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 190 190 0.0 0 1.8 A 32.9 D 24.2 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 295 99 287 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB 0 957 471 1,428 0.0 0 21.6 C 8.9 A 17.4 B 0 0 0 0 0 152 171 208 0 0 75 83 168 WB 344 539 0 883 44.6 D 17.4 B 0.0 0 27.7 C 26.9 C 0 0 0 0 0 378 261 462 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 684 79 372 1,135 48.0 D 58.9 E 16.7 B 38.6 D 500 246 424 0 0 1106 289 472 8 %0 300 126 390 50th St & NB TH 100 EB 0 1306 335 1,641 0.0 0 2.1 A 4.7 A 2.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 881 351 1,232 0.0 0 1.4 A 2.5 A 1.7 A 2.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 171 20 20 0 0 25 20 40 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Grange Rd (Signal)EB 0 1218 88 1,306 0.0 0 4.5 A 3.7 A 4.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 171 91 183 0 0 0 0 0 WB 8 940 0 948 37.3 D 8.4 A 0.0 0 8.6 A 11.7 B 0 0 0 0 0 279 124 241 0 0 0 0 0 NB 293 0 208 501 38.1 D 4.0 A 37.2 D 35.8 D 180 153 206 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 122 205 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Dale Rd EB 23 1382 18 1,423 6.4 A 1.5 A 1.2 A 1.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 279 20 76 0 0 0 0 0 WB 6 900 1 907 15.7 C 0.7 A 0.2 A 0.8 A 2.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 342 20 121 0 0 0 0 0 NB 22 0 22 44 66.3 F 0.0 0 12.3 B 37.4 E 0 0 0 0 0 349 21 77 1 %0 100 20 41 SB 3 0 23 26 55.9 F 0.0 0 6.8 A 12.7 B 0 0 0 0 0 320 20 30 1 %0 50 20 44 50th St & Eden Ave EB 0 1400 8 1,408 0.0 0 0.9 A 0.6 A 0.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 342 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 WB 134 907 0 1,041 19.7 C 0.5 A 0.0 0 2.9 A 6.1 A 120 57 145 0 0 327 20 112 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 254 254 0.0 0 3.1 A 48.5 E 46.6 E 0 0 0 0 0 242 140 318 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Sunnyslope Rd EB 2 1653 0 1,655 15.3 C 0.7 A 0.0 0 0.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 327 20 68 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 1037 8 1,045 0.0 0 0.8 A 0.5 A 0.8 A 0.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 8 0 3 11 40.6 E 0.0 0 7.6 A 30.7 D 430 20 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 20 29 Eden Ave & Brookside Ave EB 2 395 0 397 2.8 A 0.9 A 0.0 0 0.9 A 100 0 20 0 0 635 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 371 4 375 0.0 0 0.2 A 0.1 A 0.2 A 0.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 15 0 12 27 9.8 A 0.0 0 4.3 A 7.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 345 20 42 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & OLG Entrance EB 1 395 15 411 0.0 0 1.1 A 0.2 A 1.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 142 20 97 0 0 0 0 0 WB 17 361 0 378 3.9 A 0.7 A 0.0 0 0.8 A 1.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 20 59 0 0 0 0 0 NB 12 0 18 30 10.1 B 0.0 0 6.8 A 8.2 A 320 20 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 20 30 SB 4 0 2 6 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 60 305 53 418 3.0 A 3.8 A 3.1 A 3.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 36 84 0 0 0 0 0 WB 52 180 104 336 3.2 A 3.4 A 3.0 A 3.3 A 3.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 34 92 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 85 94 8 187 4.4 A 5.3 A 4.2 A 4.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 642 31 72 0 0 0 0 0 SB 33 116 117 266 4.4 A 4.3 A 3.8 A 4.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 296 31 89 0 0 0 0 0 Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100 EB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 32 0 25 57 6.8 A 0.0 0 1.3 A 4.4 A 0.8 A 340 20 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 20 NB 0 232 0 232 0.0 0 0.6 A 0.0 0 0.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 296 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 237 0 237 0.0 0 0.2 A 0.0 0 0.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 146 252 0 398 5.5 A 5.9 A 0.0 0 5.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 700 39 181 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 192 177 369 0.0 0 2.1 A 2.0 A 2.1 A 3.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 79 29 86 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 165 0 173 338 3.2 A 1.5 A 2.8 A 2.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 80 30 118 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 10 173 234 417 1.7 A 2.1 A 1.7 A 1.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 79 20 78 0 0 0 0 0 WB 55 82 5 142 3.4 A 4.3 A 3.3 A 3.9 A 2.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 314 20 83 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 264 0 76 340 3.9 A 0.0 0 3.8 A 3.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 432 29 77 0 0 0 0 0 SB 5 0 22 27 3.3 A 0.0 0 3.2 A 3.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 349 20 31 0 0 0 0 0 Grange Rd & NB TH 100 EB 258 0 247 505 22.2 C 0.0 0 3.4 A 12.8 B 320 95 268 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200 20 168 WB 0 0 43 43 0.0 0 0.0 0 6.3 A 6.3 A 7.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 159 21 59 0 0 0 0 0 NB 121 202 2 325 2.4 A 1.5 A 1.1 A 1.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 80 22 98 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 91 5 96 0.0 0 0.4 A 0.4 A 0.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 180 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 NOTES 1. If the reported queue is greater than zero (0), but less than ft, a minimum of ft is reported. 2. Block Percentage is proportion of analysis time (1 hour) the storage lane or through lane is blocked or blocking. 3. Multiple storage lanes of different length are averaged together to show the "Effective Storage Length" per lane.PM Peak Hour Table B6 Eden Avenue 2040 Build 2 Conditions - Realigned Wilson Rd, Realigned Grange Rd, Mini-Roundabouts at Eden/Grange and Eden/Wilson, Signal at 50th/Dale/New Grange AM & PM Peak Hours L T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOS Delay (S/Veh)LOS Delay (S/Veh)LOS Storage (feet) 3 Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 % Block Thru (2) ----> % Block Left (2) <---- Link Length (feet) Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 % Block Right (2) ----> % Block Thru (2) <---- Storage (feet) 3 Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal)EB 6 5 4 15 24.8 C 21.0 C 4.6 A 16.0 B 50 20 35 0 0 356 20 37 0 0 0 0 0 WB 215 2 197 414 20.1 C 14.1 B 8.7 A 14.6 B 20.5 C 100 86 147 0 1 % 635 67 212 0 0 0 0 0 NB 2 649 274 925 63.4 E 31.5 C 6.2 A 23.9 C 100 20 50 0 23 % 379 194 367 3 %0 250 75 284 SB 123 402 11 536 27.5 C 17.2 B 14.3 B 19.3 B 145 65 141 0 1 % 792 93 199 1 %0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 12 4 12 28 28.4 D 17.4 C 4.6 A 17.1 C 0 0 0 0 0 204 20 45 2 %0 50 20 34 WB 56 4 64 124 28.4 D 46.6 E 24.5 C 26.9 D 6.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 418 46 180 6 % 9 % 50 35 96 NB 13 756 79 848 6.7 A 5.6 A 4.8 A 5.5 A 100 20 28 0 0 792 20 198 2 %0 140 20 90 SB 60 490 31 581 10.6 B 1.4 A 1.3 A 2.3 A 100 22 69 0 0 382 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 186 587 67 840 40.4 D 28.2 C 28.7 C 30.9 C 150 114 227 0 2 % 382 220 396 2 %0 0 0 0 WB 85 397 322 804 28.8 C 14.6 B 12.9 B 15.3 B 26.8 C 200 49 129 0 0 390 119 278 0 0 0 0 0 NB 19 70 13 102 47.4 D 43.9 D 29.5 C 42.5 D 50 20 85 0 28 % 438 65 142 0 0 0 0 0 SB 391 89 170 650 40.1 D 30.7 C 18.1 B 33.2 C 590 205 443 1 % 1 %0 124 263 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 0 959 35 994 0.0 0 14.3 B 11.1 B 14.2 B 0 0 0 0 8 % 390 183 404 28 %0 0 0 0 WB 0 803 0 803 0.0 0 1.2 A 0.0 0 1.2 A 14.3 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 198 198 0.0 0 6.7 A 72.3 F 52.6 F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 295 154 343 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB 0 755 401 1,156 0.0 0 27.4 C 13.1 B 22.5 C 0 0 0 0 0 152 180 222 0 0 75 94 192 WB 424 570 0 994 41.6 D 15.5 B 0.0 0 26.4 C 25.8 C 0 0 0 0 0 378 296 496 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 381 73 234 688 39.2 D 42.3 D 11.4 B 30.4 C 500 140 251 0 0 1106 189 294 0 0 300 59 142 50th St & NB TH 100 EB 0 722 415 1,137 0.0 0 1.6 A 4.5 A 2.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 993 757 1,750 0.0 0 2.1 A 5.1 A 3.3 A 3.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 177 20 137 0 4 % 25 32 61 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Dale Rd (Signal)EB 19 585 118 722 35.8 D 1.7 A 1.2 A 2.5 A 150 20 56 0 0 275 20 59 1 %0 70 20 53 WB 20 1414 3 1,437 17.6 B 9.9 A 5.5 A 10.0 B 10.4 B 150 20 155 0 6 % 341 152 346 6 %0 0 0 0 NB 326 0 140 466 32.7 C 0.8 A 10.3 B 20.0 C 150 107 224 1 %0 344 82 365 0 0 0 0 0 SB 5 1 20 26 46.8 D 41.5 D 22.1 C 28.8 C 0 0 0 0 0 311 20 48 0 0 100 20 60 50th St & Eden Ave EB 0 722 4 726 0.0 0 0.7 A 0.4 A 0.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 341 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 WB 192 1437 0 1,629 7.7 A 1.2 A 0.0 0 1.9 A 2.0 A 120 50 110 0 0 327 20 116 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 207 207 0.0 0 0.6 A 7.5 A 7.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 242 49 121 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Sunnyslope Rd EB 1 929 0 930 30.5 D 0.4 A 0.0 0 0.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 327 20 30 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 1623 5 1,628 0.0 0 1.7 A 1.2 A 1.7 A 1.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 5 5 0.0 0 0.0 0 7.8 A 7.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 20 29 Eden Ave & Brookside Ave EB 4 380 0 384 2.9 A 0.9 A 0.0 0 0.9 A 100 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 392 3 395 0.0 0 0.7 A 0.4 A 0.7 A 0.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 3 3 0.0 0 0.0 0 2.3 A 2.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 345 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & OLG Entrance EB 2 263 115 380 0.0 0 1.5 A 0.5 A 1.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 142 20 54 0 0 0 0 0 WB 160 338 1 499 8.2 A 3.3 A 0.0 0 4.8 A 5.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 65 132 0 0 0 0 0 NB 56 0 160 216 41.2 E 0.0 0 8.8 A 17.1 C 320 37 130 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 % 100 35 106 SB 1 0 0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 54 320 49 423 2.2 A 3.2 A 2.1 A 2.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 32 79 0 0 0 0 0 WB 47 304 106 457 3.6 A 4.8 A 3.5 A 4.4 A 4.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 46 131 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 67 75 16 158 4.2 A 5.5 A 3.7 A 4.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 642 30 78 0 0 0 0 0 SB 26 51 129 206 5.6 A 7.8 A 8.1 A 7.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 296 43 136 0 0 0 0 0 Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100 EB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 59 0 16 75 6.6 A 0.0 0 1.4 A 5.5 A 1.3 A 340 28 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 263 0 263 0.0 0 0.7 A 0.0 0 0.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 296 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 123 0 123 0.0 0 0.2 A 0.0 0 0.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 0 418 0 418 0.0 0 7.1 A 0.0 0 7.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 700 56 204 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 249 0 249 0.0 0 2.0 A 0.0 0 2.0 A 6.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 79 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 252 0 248 500 8.3 A 0.0 0 7.1 A 7.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 467 74 202 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 371 157 143 671 3.8 A 3.7 A 3.7 A 3.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 79 68 136 0 0 0 0 0 WB 44 144 8 196 5.1 A 6.3 A 4.7 A 6.0 A 4.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 314 40 97 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 100 99 45 244 6.2 A 7.8 A 5.9 A 6.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 432 51 123 0 0 0 0 0 SB 5 81 5 91 3.0 A 2.8 A 2.4 A 2.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 344 20 52 0 0 0 0 0AM Peak HourVehicle Queing Information (feet) Right Turn Lane Intersection Approach Demand Volumes Delay (s/veh)LOS ByApproach LOS ByIntersection Left Turn Lane Through Lane (s) Eden Avenue 2040 Build 2 Conditions - Realigned Wilson Rd, Realigned Grange Rd, Mini-Roundabouts at Eden/Grange and Eden/Wilson, Signal at 50th/Dale/New Grange AM & PM Peak Hours L T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOS Delay (S/Veh)LOS Delay (S/Veh)LOS Storage (feet) 3 Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 % Block Thru (2) ----> % Block Left (2) <---- Link Length (feet) Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 % Block Right (2) ----> % Block Thru (2) <---- Storage (feet) 3 Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 Vehicle Queing Information (feet) Right Turn Lane Intersection Approach Demand Volumes Delay (s/veh)LOS ByApproach LOS ByIntersection Left Turn Lane Through Lane (s) Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal)EB 2 11 5 18 36.1 D 25.8 C 4.4 A 19.8 B 50 20 22 0 1 % 356 20 42 0 0 0 0 0 WB 231 4 170 405 22.6 C 14.7 B 11.0 B 17.8 B 17.9 B 100 92 148 0 1 % 635 75 241 0 0 0 0 0 NB 2 957 308 1,267 71.4 E 22.9 C 6.0 A 18.9 B 100 20 61 0 29 % 379 201 364 3 %0 250 68 282 SB 112 517 7 636 26.0 C 13.7 B 12.8 B 15.8 B 145 57 130 0 1 % 792 93 201 1 %0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 12 12 12 36 25.2 D 25.7 D 5.6 A 17.6 C 0 0 0 0 0 204 20 60 1 %0 50 20 34 WB 76 12 68 156 34.6 D 33.0 D 16.5 C 26.4 D 5.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 418 56 140 21 % 6 % 50 41 98 NB 9 1056 62 1,127 7.2 A 3.8 A 3.7 A 3.8 A 100 20 25 0 0 792 20 31 0 0 140 0 20 SB 59 478 30 567 16.7 C 2.0 A 1.9 A 3.5 A 100 29 98 0 0 382 20 21 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 305 804 39 1,148 38.9 D 20.6 C 20.6 C 25.3 C 150 159 229 0 4 % 382 217 380 4 %0 0 0 0 WB 76 441 394 911 33.9 C 24.8 C 23.0 C 24.8 C 33.4 C 200 55 144 0 1 % 390 230 385 1 %0 0 0 0 NB 30 122 24 176 62.2 E 53.1 D 44.6 D 53.3 D 50 30 100 0 46 % 438 111 258 0 0 0 0 0 SB 446 84 104 634 64.9 E 42.2 D 28.4 C 55.7 E 590 291 722 4 %0 0 140 275 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 0 1236 41 1,277 0.0 0 6.7 A 5.1 A 6.6 A 0 0 0 0 3 % 390 89 328 12 %0 0 0 0 WB 0 910 0 910 0.0 0 1.2 A 0.0 0 1.2 A 6.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 190 190 0.0 0 1.0 A 31.7 D 23.2 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 295 96 230 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB 0 957 471 1,428 0.0 0 21.4 C 9.8 A 17.6 B 0 0 0 0 0 152 170 212 0 0 75 89 181 WB 344 539 0 883 50.6 D 18.4 B 0.0 0 30.9 C 27.1 C 0 0 0 0 0 378 282 483 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 684 79 372 1,135 45.6 D 55.6 E 15.3 B 36.3 D 500 235 367 0 0 1106 282 432 6 %0 300 119 349 50th St & NB TH 100 EB 0 1306 335 1,641 0.0 0 1.8 A 4.3 A 2.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 881 484 1,365 0.0 0 1.5 A 2.6 A 1.9 A 2.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 177 20 84 0 1 % 25 20 43 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Dale Rd (Signal)EB 23 1182 101 1,306 14.9 B 2.5 A 1.3 A 2.6 A 150 20 52 0 0 275 32 86 1 %0 70 20 48 WB 14 892 1 907 31.9 C 7.9 A 4.2 A 8.3 A 9.8 A 150 20 67 0 1 % 341 110 231 1 %0 0 0 0 NB 414 0 230 644 33.6 C 0.0 0 14.5 B 26.8 C 150 132 216 1 % 1 % 344 80 256 0 0 0 0 0 SB 3 0 23 26 47.5 D 0.0 0 11.2 B 15.1 B 0 0 0 0 0 311 20 39 0 0 100 20 49 50th St & Eden Ave EB 0 1400 8 1,408 0.0 0 1.1 A 0.9 A 1.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 341 20 21 0 0 0 0 0 WB 134 907 0 1,041 22.8 C 0.5 A 0.0 0 3.3 A 6.1 A 120 63 145 0 0 327 20 59 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 254 254 0.0 0 3.8 A 48.3 E 46.3 E 0 0 0 0 0 242 130 296 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Sunnyslope Rd EB 2 1653 0 1,655 6.7 A 0.6 A 0.0 0 0.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 327 20 41 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 1037 8 1,045 0.0 0 0.8 A 0.8 A 0.8 A 0.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 847 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 8 0 3 11 34.3 D 0.0 0 5.5 A 26.4 D 430 20 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 20 29 Eden Ave & Brookside Ave EB 2 395 0 397 6.7 A 0.8 A 0.0 0 0.8 A 100 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 371 4 375 0.0 0 0.2 A 0.1 A 0.2 A 0.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 15 0 12 27 9.9 A 0.0 0 4.3 A 7.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 345 20 40 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & OLG Entrance EB 1 395 15 411 0.0 0 1.1 A 0.1 A 1.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 142 20 78 0 0 0 0 0 WB 17 361 0 378 4.2 A 0.7 A 0.0 0 0.8 A 1.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 20 83 0 0 0 0 0 NB 12 0 18 30 13.3 B 0.0 0 6.5 A 8.9 A 320 20 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 20 32 SB 4 0 2 6 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 60 305 53 418 3.3 A 4.0 A 3.0 A 3.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 39 89 0 0 0 0 0 WB 52 180 104 336 2.9 A 3.2 A 2.7 A 3.0 A 3.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 82 32 96 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 85 94 8 187 4.5 A 5.1 A 3.8 A 4.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 642 30 76 0 0 0 0 0 SB 33 116 117 266 3.6 A 4.4 A 3.8 A 4.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 296 31 101 0 0 0 0 0 Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100 EB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 32 0 25 57 6.4 A 0.0 0 1.3 A 4.2 A 0.7 A 340 20 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 232 0 232 0.0 0 0.5 A 0.0 0 0.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 237 0 237 0.0 0 0.2 A 0.0 0 0.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 0 398 0 398 0.0 0 29.0 D 0.0 0 29.0 D 0 0 0 0 0 700 123 438 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 191 0 191 0.0 0 2.2 A 0.0 0 2.2 A 15.3 C 0 0 0 0 0 79 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 332 0 173 505 9.9 A 0.0 0 7.7 A 9.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 467 72 271 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 414 173 143 730 8.3 A 7.2 A 7.2 A 7.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 79 89 150 0 0 0 0 0 WB 55 71 16 142 5.7 A 5.9 A 5.7 A 5.8 A 6.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 314 37 98 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 98 166 76 340 5.9 A 6.9 A 6.0 A 6.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 432 52 124 0 0 0 0 0 SB 5 91 22 118 3.5 A 3.7 A 3.0 A 3.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 344 20 59 0 0 0 0 0 NOTES 1. If the reported queue is greater than zero (0), but less than ft, a minimum of ft is reported. 2. Block Percentage is proportion of analysis time (1 hour) the storage lane or through lane is blocked or blocking. 3. Multiple storage lanes of different length are averaged together to show the "Effective Storage Length" per lane.PM Peak Hour Table B7 Eden Avenue 2040 Build Interchange Conditions - Split Diamond Interchange AM & PM Peak Hours L T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOS Delay (S/Veh)LOS Delay (S/Veh)LOS Storage (feet) 3 Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 % Block Thru (2) ----> % Block Left (2) <---- Link Length (feet) Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 % Block Right (2) ----> % Block Thru (2) <---- Storage (feet) 3 Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal)EB 6 5 4 15 25.8 C 29.3 C 5.7 A 21.9 C 50 20 38 0 0 356 20 42 0 0 0 0 0 WB 214 2 177 393 20.9 C 5.1 A 7.6 A 14.9 B 20.6 C 100 88 149 0 1 % 635 70 259 0 0 0 0 0 NB 2 614 310 926 52.9 D 31.6 C 6.5 A 23.2 C 100 20 27 0 32 % 379 186 333 1 %0 250 64 162 SB 132 402 11 545 28.4 C 18.4 B 15.2 B 20.5 C 145 68 144 0 1 % 792 95 204 1 %0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 12 4 12 28 18.8 C 21.0 C 4.5 A 13.6 B 0 0 0 0 0 204 20 51 1 %0 50 20 31 WB 56 4 64 124 22.0 C 17.4 C 7.9 A 14.3 B 3.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 418 35 98 7 % 2 % 50 28 80 NB 13 702 79 794 7.5 A 3.0 A 2.7 A 3.0 A 100 20 28 0 0 792 0 20 0 0 140 0 20 SB 60 498 31 589 9.3 A 1.2 A 1.2 A 2.0 A 100 23 75 0 0 382 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 186 526 67 779 35.0 D 13.0 B 8.4 A 17.8 B 150 104 220 0 2 % 382 100 295 2 %0 0 0 0 WB 85 397 322 804 18.7 B 10.1 B 9.2 A 10.7 B 19.1 B 200 42 113 0 0 390 84 207 0 0 0 0 0 NB 19 70 13 102 47.0 D 44.8 D 22.6 C 42.7 D 50 20 78 0 23 % 438 61 150 0 0 0 0 0 SB 348 132 170 650 32.1 C 27.3 C 17.6 B 27.3 C 590 119 283 0 2 %0 127 235 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 0 852 35 887 0.0 0 2.0 A 1.6 A 2.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 390 20 87 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 804 0 804 0.0 0 1.1 A 0.0 0 1.1 A 1.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 155 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 104 104 0.0 0 0.5 A 8.9 A 5.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 295 42 92 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB 0 730 226 956 0.0 0 7.2 A 2.6 A 6.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 155 84 167 0 0 80 26 83 WB 220 570 0 790 24.3 C 5.8 A 0.0 0 10.9 B 13.5 B 225 94 218 0 0 304 51 136 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 381 73 234 688 35.6 D 38.2 D 9.3 A 26.9 C 500 118 236 0 0 1096 176 274 0 0 300 54 136 50th St & NB TH 100 (Signal)EB 392 719 0 1,111 18.7 B 3.9 A 0.0 0 9.1 A 225 114 276 0 0 304 37 207 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 709 612 1,321 0.0 0 15.0 B 1.1 A 8.6 A 11.3 B 0 0 0 0 0 284 93 226 1 %0 150 20 30 NB 81 160 98 339 38.8 D 29.7 C 10.4 B 27.0 C 0 0 0 0 0 539 130 248 1 %0 200 34 105 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Dale Rd (Signal)EB 19 680 118 817 18.0 B 2.0 A 1.5 A 2.3 A 150 20 49 0 0 292 33 130 2 %0 70 20 79 WB 20 1267 3 1,290 8.7 A 3.4 A 2.8 A 3.5 A 3.8 A 150 20 34 0 0 347 74 266 0 0 0 0 0 NB 34 0 42 76 34.0 C 0.3 A 7.4 A 13.6 B 150 23 86 0 0 343 20 59 0 0 0 0 0 SB 5 1 20 26 46.4 D 79.4 E 12.0 B 21.2 C 100 20 38 0 0 310 20 50 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Eden Ave EB 0 718 4 722 0.0 0 1.0 A 1.0 A 1.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 347 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 WB 338 1290 0 1,628 10.2 B 0.9 A 0.0 0 2.9 A 2.8 A 120 86 177 0 0 327 20 155 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 207 207 0.0 0 0.4 A 8.0 A 7.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 242 50 111 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Sunnyslope Rd EB 1 924 0 925 35.6 E 0.6 A 0.0 0 0.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 327 20 53 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 1623 5 1,628 0.0 0 1.7 A 1.6 A 1.7 A 1.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 847 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 5 5 0.0 0 0.0 0 12.4 B 12.4 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 20 29 Eden Ave & Brookside Ave EB 4 439 0 443 5.2 A 1.0 A 0.0 0 1.0 A 100 20 27 0 0 635 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 391 3 394 0.0 0 0.8 A 0.4 A 0.8 A 0.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 3 3 0.0 0 0.0 0 2.7 A 2.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 345 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & OLG Entrance EB 2 322 115 439 0.0 0 1.7 A 0.7 A 1.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 142 20 72 0 0 0 0 0 WB 160 338 1 499 8.7 A 3.7 A 0.0 0 5.3 A 8.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 102 73 151 0 0 0 0 0 NB 56 0 160 216 61.7 F 0.0 0 15.9 C 28.0 D 320 57 238 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 % 100 46 161 SB 1 0 0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 44 390 49 483 3.3 A 4.3 A 3.0 A 4.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 102 47 107 0 0 0 0 0 WB 47 303 106 456 6.3 A 6.9 A 5.5 A 6.5 A 5.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 259 45 168 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 67 31 60 158 4.8 A 5.9 A 4.6 A 4.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 663 35 79 0 0 0 0 0 SB 111 51 129 291 7.4 A 9.1 A 7.8 A 7.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 317 55 184 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & SB TH 100 Entrance EB 0 362 199 561 0.0 0 7.4 A 3.2 A 5.9 A 0 0 0 0 2 % 259 56 148 2 %0 100 20 72 WB 204 456 0 660 7.8 A 8.2 A 0.0 0 8.1 A 7.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 161 78 193 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 373 0 373 0.0 0 7.7 A 0.0 0 7.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 743 71 184 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & NB TH 100 EB 148 214 0 362 2.5 A 3.0 A 0.0 0 2.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 161 20 52 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 412 12 424 0.0 0 9.5 A 7.6 A 9.4 A 11.9 B 0 0 0 0 0 231 76 233 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 248 179 73 500 17.0 C 24.2 C 28.3 D 21.3 C 0 0 0 0 0 646 132 425 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 10 157 142 309 2.2 A 2.7 A 2.0 A 2.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 105 25 73 0 0 0 0 0 WB 44 293 5 342 4.2 A 5.4 A 3.3 A 5.2 A 3.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 314 43 111 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 125 74 45 244 3.2 A 4.3 A 3.2 A 3.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 432 25 71 0 0 0 0 0 SB 5 82 5 92 3.3 A 3.8 A 4.1 A 3.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 343 23 74 0 0 0 0 0AM Peak HourVehicle Queing Information (feet) Right Turn Lane Intersection Approach Demand Volumes Delay (s/veh)LOS ByApproach LOS ByIntersection Left Turn Lane Through Lane (s) Eden Avenue 2040 Build Interchange Conditions - Split Diamond Interchange AM & PM Peak Hours L T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOS Delay (S/Veh)LOS Delay (S/Veh)LOS Storage (feet) 3 Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 % Block Thru (2) ----> % Block Left (2) <---- Link Length (feet) Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 % Block Right (2) ----> % Block Thru (2) <---- Storage (feet) 3 Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 Vehicle Queing Information (feet) Right Turn Lane Intersection Approach Demand Volumes Delay (s/veh)LOS ByApproach LOS ByIntersection Left Turn Lane Through Lane (s) Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal)EB 2 11 5 18 25.5 C 21.5 C 5.1 A 17.9 B 50 20 20 0 1 % 356 20 50 0 0 0 0 0 WB 234 4 149 387 24.9 C 10.6 B 9.5 A 18.6 B 18.2 B 100 96 149 0 1 % 635 72 235 0 0 0 0 0 NB 2 916 339 1,257 47.2 D 24.1 C 6.5 A 19.3 B 100 20 20 0 37 % 379 240 376 1 %0 250 69 178 SB 124 517 7 648 27.9 C 12.9 B 9.8 A 15.7 B 145 66 150 0 1 % 792 93 191 1 %0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 12 12 12 36 35.3 E 31.4 D 5.9 A 25.3 D 0 0 0 0 0 204 21 66 3 %0 50 20 33 WB 76 12 68 156 33.6 D 35.4 E 13.6 B 25.1 D 5.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 418 55 158 20 % 3 % 50 37 99 NB 9 994 62 1,065 8.4 A 3.9 A 2.7 A 3.9 A 100 20 20 0 0 792 20 99 0 0 140 0 20 SB 59 488 30 577 14.1 B 1.7 A 1.7 A 2.9 A 100 26 76 0 0 382 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 305 733 39 1,077 40.1 D 16.3 B 10.9 B 23.0 C 150 164 230 0 6 % 382 166 383 6 %0 0 0 0 WB 76 441 394 911 23.7 C 19.9 B 17.8 B 19.3 B 26.8 C 200 41 100 0 0 390 166 331 0 0 0 0 0 NB 30 122 24 176 71.2 E 58.1 E 47.9 D 58.9 E 50 29 100 0 49 % 438 115 258 0 0 0 0 0 SB 394 135 104 633 40.7 D 32.7 C 20.6 C 35.7 D 590 152 327 1 % 1 %0 122 255 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 0 1110 41 1,151 0.0 0 4.1 A 2.8 A 4.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 390 43 200 3 %0 0 0 0 WB 0 911 0 911 0.0 0 1.1 A 0.0 0 1.1 A 3.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 92 92 0.0 0 0.7 A 11.0 B 6.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 295 40 82 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB 0 938 264 1,202 0.0 0 17.2 B 3.7 A 14.4 B 0 0 0 0 0 155 142 191 0 0 80 36 99 WB 187 539 0 726 24.8 C 10.5 B 0.0 0 14.1 B 20.0 C 225 112 225 0 0 304 82 181 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 684 79 372 1,135 36.9 D 41.9 D 13.3 B 29.5 C 500 209 327 0 0 1096 255 374 3 %0 300 94 291 50th St & NB TH 100 (Signal)EB 319 1303 0 1,622 18.4 B 2.7 A 0.0 0 5.7 A 225 109 247 0 0 304 20 109 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 587 351 938 0.0 0 10.4 B 0.5 A 6.7 A 9.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 284 46 151 0 0 0 0 0 NB 139 126 119 384 35.9 D 31.8 C 20.6 C 30.2 C 0 0 0 0 0 539 146 275 3 %0 200 55 159 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Dale Rd (Signal)EB 23 1298 101 1,422 6.6 A 1.7 A 1.1 A 1.7 A 150 20 48 0 0 292 35 100 1 %0 70 20 34 WB 14 789 1 804 25.5 C 3.8 A 0.0 A 4.2 A 5.0 A 150 20 48 0 0 347 62 148 0 0 0 0 0 NB 126 0 106 232 38.5 D 0.0 0 15.8 B 28.0 C 150 80 152 0 0 343 48 126 0 0 0 0 0 SB 3 0 23 26 62.3 E 0.0 0 7.4 A 12.0 B 100 20 23 0 0 310 20 47 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Eden Ave EB 0 1399 8 1,407 0.0 0 1.1 A 1.0 A 1.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 347 20 23 0 0 0 0 0 WB 238 804 0 1,042 41.4 E 1.2 A 0.0 0 10.4 B 10.0 B 120 121 194 0 0 327 63 322 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 254 254 0.0 0 5.4 A 61.2 F 59.2 F 0 0 0 0 0 242 155 304 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Sunnyslope Rd EB 2 1651 0 1,653 12.4 B 0.7 A 0.0 0 0.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 327 20 75 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 1039 8 1,047 0.0 0 1.1 A 0.5 A 1.1 A 1.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 847 20 81 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 8 0 3 11 60.7 F 0.0 0 7.2 A 42.9 E 430 20 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 20 29 Eden Ave & Brookside Ave EB 2 472 0 474 3.1 A 1.1 A 0.0 0 1.1 A 100 20 20 0 0 635 20 26 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 373 4 377 0.0 0 0.2 A 0.2 A 0.2 A 0.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 15 0 13 28 10.2 B 0.0 0 4.2 A 7.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 345 20 41 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & OLG Entrance EB 1 471 15 487 0.0 0 1.5 A 1.1 A 1.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 142 20 92 0 0 0 0 0 WB 17 365 0 382 5.6 A 1.0 A 0.0 0 1.2 A 1.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 102 20 100 0 0 0 0 0 NB 10 0 18 28 13.7 B 0.0 0 15.7 C 15.0 C 320 20 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 20 45 SB 4 0 2 6 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 51 389 53 493 4.4 A 5.4 A 4.4 A 5.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 102 51 111 0 0 0 0 0 WB 52 177 104 333 3.5 A 4.2 A 3.3 A 3.8 A 4.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 259 26 87 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 86 41 62 189 5.0 A 5.3 A 4.6 A 4.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 663 33 84 0 0 0 0 0 SB 121 116 119 356 5.3 A 5.5 A 5.1 A 5.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 317 45 132 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & SB TH 100 Entrance EB 0 348 224 572 0.0 0 9.2 A 3.2 A 6.9 A 0 0 0 0 3 % 259 58 192 3 %0 100 20 112 WB 156 333 0 489 2.5 A 3.8 A 0.0 0 3.4 A 5.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 161 22 90 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 372 0 372 0.0 0 7.2 A 0.0 0 7.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 743 66 158 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & NB TH 100 EB 115 233 0 348 1.9 A 2.7 A 0.0 0 2.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 161 20 58 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 316 11 327 0.0 0 7.5 A 6.4 A 7.5 A 9.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 231 61 155 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 173 258 74 505 13.8 B 16.3 C 19.9 C 16.0 C 0 0 0 0 0 646 118 378 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 10 173 144 327 2.1 A 2.5 A 2.2 A 2.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 105 20 75 0 0 0 0 0 WB 55 186 5 246 4.7 A 5.6 A 4.9 A 5.4 A 3.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 314 38 110 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 117 146 76 339 3.9 A 4.6 A 3.7 A 4.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 432 28 93 0 0 0 0 0 SB 5 91 22 118 3.1 A 4.0 A 3.3 A 3.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 343 20 56 0 0 0 0 0 NOTES 1. If the reported queue is greater than zero (0), but less than ft, a minimum of ft is reported. 2. Block Percentage is proportion of analysis time (1 hour) the storage lane or through lane is blocked or blocking. 3. Multiple storage lanes of different length are averaged together to show the "Effective Storage Length" per lane.PM Peak Hour Table B8 Eden Avenue 2040 Build Interchange Conditions - Offset SPUI AM & PM Peak Hours L T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOS Delay (S/Veh)LOS Delay (S/Veh)LOS Storage (feet) 3 Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 % Block Thru (2) ----> % Block Left (2) <---- Link Length (feet) Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 % Block Right (2) ----> % Block Thru (2) <---- Storage (feet) 3 Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal)EB 6 5 4 15 20.7 C 18.3 B 5.1 A 15.2 B 50 20 31 0 0 356 20 36 0 0 0 0 0 WB 214 2 177 393 20.0 C 7.8 A 7.0 A 14.0 B 19.6 B 100 83 147 0 0 635 57 184 0 0 0 0 0 NB 2 614 310 926 62.0 E 30.5 C 6.6 A 22.3 C 100 20 44 0 31 % 379 180 336 0 0 250 67 172 SB 132 402 11 545 26.4 C 17.5 B 12.4 B 19.3 B 145 66 132 0 1 % 792 91 200 1 %0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 12 4 12 28 20.4 C 21.1 C 4.6 A 13.1 B 0 0 0 0 0 204 20 43 1 %0 50 20 34 WB 56 4 64 124 23.1 C 26.1 D 7.9 A 15.1 C 3.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 418 35 88 7 % 2 % 50 29 84 NB 13 702 79 794 7.1 A 2.9 A 2.6 A 2.9 A 100 20 26 0 0 792 0 20 0 0 140 0 20 SB 60 498 31 589 9.7 A 1.2 A 1.3 A 2.1 A 100 23 78 0 0 382 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 186 526 67 779 33.3 C 12.8 B 11.1 B 17.5 B 150 101 218 0 2 % 382 99 243 2 %0 0 0 0 WB 85 397 322 804 18.7 B 10.3 B 8.4 A 10.4 B 18.8 B 200 40 120 0 0 390 84 196 0 0 0 0 0 NB 19 70 13 102 50.2 D 43.9 D 25.5 C 42.7 D 50 20 68 0 24 % 438 62 128 0 0 0 0 0 SB 348 132 170 650 31.0 C 28.7 C 18.5 B 27.3 C 590 113 268 0 2 %0 125 256 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 0 852 35 887 0.0 0 3.3 A 1.5 A 3.2 A 0 0 0 0 5 % 390 35 155 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 804 0 804 0.0 0 1.6 A 0.0 0 1.6 A 2.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 147 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 104 104 0.0 0 0.4 A 8.5 A 4.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 290 37 90 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave/50th & TH 100 (Signal) EB 392 338 226 956 18.2 B 8.6 A 3.4 A 11.3 B 145 127 181 0 0 147 52 119 0 0 75 36 93 WB 220 489 0 709 16.8 B 23.4 C 0.0 0 21.3 C 21.7 C 225 86 177 0 0 283 115 230 0 0 0 0 0 NB 81 160 98 339 30.4 C 36.1 D 8.3 A 26.4 C 200 46 120 0 0 749 82 174 0 0 200 29 71 SB 381 73 234 688 48.1 D 37.3 D 9.9 A 34.0 C 500 159 248 0 0 1099 47 136 0 0 300 54 125 50th St & NB TH 100 EB 0 817 0 817 0.0 0 1.1 A 0.0 0 1.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 709 612 1,321 0.0 0 0.6 A 0.8 A 0.7 A 0.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 150 20 26 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Dale Rd (Signal)EB 19 680 118 817 16.2 B 1.6 A 1.2 A 1.9 A 150 20 51 0 0 292 26 100 1 %0 70 20 59 WB 20 1267 3 1,290 8.6 A 3.1 A 1.8 A 3.2 A 3.4 A 150 20 40 0 0 347 71 249 0 0 0 0 0 NB 34 0 42 76 36.6 D 0.3 A 7.3 A 13.2 B 150 22 86 0 0 343 20 62 0 0 0 0 0 SB 5 1 20 26 51.1 D 73.0 E 14.6 B 20.6 C 100 20 33 0 0 310 20 62 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Eden Ave EB 0 718 4 722 0.0 0 0.9 A 0.7 A 0.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 347 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 WB 338 1290 0 1,628 10.2 B 0.8 A 0.0 0 2.8 A 2.7 A 120 85 184 0 0 327 20 118 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 207 207 0.0 0 0.3 A 8.6 A 8.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 242 54 127 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Sunnyslope Rd EB 1 924 0 925 16.1 C 0.4 A 0.0 0 0.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 327 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 1623 5 1,628 0.0 0 1.8 A 1.0 A 1.8 A 1.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 847 20 108 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 5 5 0.0 0 0.0 0 19.1 C 19.1 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 20 32 Eden Ave & Brookside Ave EB 4 439 0 443 4.6 A 1.0 A 0.0 0 1.0 A 100 20 23 0 0 635 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 391 3 394 0.0 0 0.8 A 0.5 A 0.8 A 0.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 3 3 0.0 0 0.0 0 4.3 A 4.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 345 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & OLG Entrance EB 2 322 115 439 0.0 0 1.8 A 0.7 A 1.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 142 20 93 0 0 0 0 0 WB 160 338 1 499 8.3 A 3.6 A 0.0 0 5.1 A 6.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 104 74 153 0 0 0 0 0 NB 56 0 160 216 48.7 E 0.0 0 10.6 B 21.2 C 320 46 215 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 % 100 44 131 SB 1 0 0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 44 390 49 483 3.9 A 4.7 A 3.2 A 4.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 104 49 115 0 0 0 0 0 WB 47 303 106 456 7.1 A 8.4 A 7.2 A 8.0 A 6.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 278 61 188 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 67 31 60 158 5.1 A 6.2 A 4.9 A 5.2 A 0 0 0 0 0 663 36 75 0 0 0 0 0 SB 111 51 129 291 6.6 A 7.2 A 6.2 A 6.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 317 53 156 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & TH 100 (Signal)EB 148 214 199 561 26.9 C 32.3 C 1.5 A 20.1 C 150 81 206 0 5 % 278 122 283 5 %0 150 20 197 WB 204 208 12 424 28.8 C 29.4 C 22.8 C 28.9 C 21.7 C 200 94 212 0 1 % 494 115 221 0 0 0 0 0 NB 248 179 73 500 34.7 C 11.7 B 5.1 A 22.2 C 200 128 250 0 0 647 63 220 0 0 200 20 59 SB 0 444 0 444 0.0 0 16.9 B 0.0 0 16.9 B 0 0 0 0 3 % 749 145 295 3 %0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 10 157 142 309 2.5 A 4.2 A 2.9 A 3.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 105 34 127 0 0 0 0 0 WB 44 293 5 342 3.7 A 5.1 A 3.1 A 4.9 A 4.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 314 40 113 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 125 74 45 244 3.3 A 4.6 A 3.3 A 3.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 432 26 78 0 0 0 0 0 SB 5 82 5 92 3.5 A 3.6 A 3.6 A 3.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 343 24 64 0 0 0 0 0 Vehicle Queing Information (feet) Right Turn Lane Intersection Approach Demand Volumes Delay (s/veh)LOS ByApproach LOS ByIntersection Left Turn Lane Through Lane (s)AM Peak Hour Eden Avenue 2040 Build Interchange Conditions - Offset SPUI AM & PM Peak Hours L T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOS Delay (S/Veh)LOS Delay (S/Veh)LOS Storage (feet) 3 Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 % Block Thru (2) ----> % Block Left (2) <---- Link Length (feet) Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 % Block Right (2) ----> % Block Thru (2) <---- Storage (feet) 3 Avg. Queue (feet) 1 Max Queue (feet) 1 Vehicle Queing Information (feet) Right Turn Lane Intersection Approach Demand Volumes Delay (s/veh)LOS ByApproach LOS ByIntersection Left Turn Lane Through Lane (s) Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal)EB 2 11 5 18 25.3 C 23.3 C 4.5 A 17.3 B 50 20 27 0 0 356 20 44 0 0 0 0 0 WB 234 4 149 387 24.4 C 12.3 B 9.7 A 18.6 B 17.8 B 100 98 148 0 1 % 635 70 254 0 0 0 0 0 NB 2 916 339 1,257 38.5 D 23.9 C 6.5 A 19.2 B 100 20 38 0 37 % 379 239 384 1 %0 250 68 164 SB 124 517 7 648 27.1 C 12.0 B 5.7 A 14.7 B 145 61 139 0 0 792 89 180 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 12 12 12 36 25.3 D 32.1 D 6.3 A 20.1 C 0 0 0 0 0 204 20 58 2 %0 50 20 36 WB 76 12 68 156 33.5 D 32.6 D 13.3 B 24.7 C 5.5 A 0 0 0 0 0 418 60 174 21 % 4 % 50 36 91 NB 9 994 62 1,065 7.7 A 3.6 A 2.5 A 3.6 A 100 20 26 0 0 792 20 51 0 0 140 0 20 SB 59 488 30 577 13.4 B 1.7 A 1.6 A 2.8 A 100 24 83 0 0 382 20 23 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 305 733 39 1,077 39.4 D 15.4 B 12.0 B 22.2 C 150 164 230 0 5 % 382 145 373 5 %0 0 0 0 WB 76 441 394 911 25.6 C 19.8 B 16.9 B 19.1 B 26.3 C 200 43 110 0 0 390 167 316 0 0 0 0 0 NB 30 122 24 176 61.2 E 58.7 E 40.8 D 56.7 E 50 29 100 0 49 % 438 117 249 0 0 0 0 0 SB 394 135 104 633 39.8 D 32.9 C 21.2 C 35.1 D 590 147 295 1 % 3 %0 122 257 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 0 1110 41 1,151 0.0 0 3.4 A 1.9 A 3.3 A 0 0 0 0 5 % 390 42 143 1 %0 0 0 0 WB 0 911 0 911 0.0 0 1.3 A 0.0 0 1.3 A 2.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 147 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 92 92 0.0 0 0.6 A 10.2 B 5.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 290 38 84 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon Ave/50th & TH 100 (Signal) EB 319 619 264 1,202 22.8 C 15.7 B 4.1 A 15.1 B 145 137 177 0 0 147 109 174 0 0 75 43 88 WB 187 400 0 587 35.1 D 23.0 C 0.0 0 26.9 C 22.7 C 225 113 222 0 0 283 89 170 0 0 0 0 0 NB 139 126 119 384 27.4 C 51.6 D 15.9 B 31.8 C 200 73 175 0 0 749 85 174 0 0 200 41 96 SB 684 79 372 1,135 31.0 C 35.2 D 13.4 B 25.4 C 500 200 335 0 0 1099 44 111 0 0 300 86 193 50th St & NB TH 100 EB 0 1422 0 1,422 0.0 0 1.4 A 0.0 0 1.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 587 351 938 0.0 0 0.4 A 0.5 A 0.4 A 1.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Dale Rd (Signal)EB 23 1298 101 1,422 9.3 A 2.8 A 1.7 A 2.8 A 150 20 39 0 0 292 60 142 6 %0 70 20 79 WB 14 789 1 804 24.1 C 3.6 A 4.4 A 3.9 A 5.6 A 150 20 42 0 0 347 60 161 0 0 0 0 0 NB 126 0 111 237 40.0 D 0.0 0 12.7 B 27.3 C 150 84 140 0 0 343 42 108 0 0 0 0 0 SB 3 0 23 26 64.2 E 0.0 0 7.1 A 14.0 B 100 20 46 0 0 310 20 39 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Eden Ave EB 0 1399 8 1,407 0.0 0 1.3 A 1.0 A 1.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 347 20 32 0 0 0 0 0 WB 238 804 0 1,042 30.4 D 0.8 A 0.0 0 7.7 A 8.5 A 120 109 193 0 0 327 44 283 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 254 254 0.0 0 1.2 A 51.6 F 49.9 E 0 0 0 0 0 242 149 307 0 0 0 0 0 SB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50th St & Sunnyslope Rd EB 2 1651 0 1,653 7.0 A 0.7 A 0.0 0 0.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 327 20 42 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 1039 8 1,047 0.0 0 0.9 A 0.6 A 0.9 A 0.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 847 20 31 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 8 0 3 11 32.3 D 0.0 0 8.0 A 27.4 D 430 20 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 20 25 Eden Ave & Brookside Ave EB 2 472 0 474 3.9 A 1.3 A 0.0 0 1.3 A 100 20 20 0 0 635 20 66 0 0 0 0 0 WB 0 373 4 377 0.0 0 0.2 A 0.0 A 0.2 A 1.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 15 0 13 28 11.0 B 0.0 0 3.9 A 7.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 345 20 44 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & OLG Entrance EB 1 471 15 487 0.0 0 1.9 A 0.7 A 1.9 A 0 0 0 0 0 142 20 113 0 0 0 0 0 WB 17 365 0 382 5.1 A 0.9 A 0.0 0 1.1 A 2.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 104 20 90 0 0 0 0 0 NB 10 0 18 28 11.4 B 0.0 0 16.7 C 14.9 B 320 20 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 20 41 SB 4 0 2 6 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 51 389 53 493 4.9 A 5.9 A 4.8 A 5.7 A 0 0 0 0 0 104 56 113 0 0 0 0 0 WB 52 177 104 333 6.2 A 6.2 A 5.5 A 6.0 A 5.6 A 0 0 0 0 0 278 40 145 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 86 41 62 189 5.2 A 5.8 A 5.2 A 5.3 A 0 0 0 0 0 663 34 86 0 0 0 0 0 SB 121 116 119 356 5.1 A 5.3 A 4.8 A 5.1 A 0 0 0 0 0 317 44 125 0 0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & TH 100 (Signal)EB 115 233 224 572 32.5 C 36.1 D 2.7 A 22.7 C 150 71 195 0 8 % 278 139 308 8 %0 150 25 197 WB 156 160 11 327 41.1 D 33.1 C 27.1 C 36.5 D 20.8 C 200 90 236 0 1 % 494 102 217 0 0 0 0 0 NB 173 258 74 505 19.5 B 11.4 B 4.6 A 13.2 B 200 67 142 0 0 647 76 194 0 0 200 20 70 SB 0 473 0 473 0.0 0 15.8 B 0.0 0 15.8 B 0 0 0 0 3 % 749 128 278 3 %0 0 0 0 Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 10 173 144 327 4.3 A 4.9 A 3.9 A 4.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 105 42 139 0 0 0 0 0 WB 55 186 5 246 3.9 A 5.1 A 4.2 A 4.8 A 4.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 314 32 100 0 0 0 0 0 MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 117 146 76 339 4.0 A 4.8 A 4.1 A 4.4 A 0 0 0 0 0 432 31 112 0 0 0 0 0 SB 5 91 22 118 3.7 A 3.9 A 3.3 A 3.8 A 0 0 0 0 0 343 20 55 0 0 0 0 0 NOTES 1. If the reported queue is greater than zero (0), but less than ft, a minimum of ft is reported. 2. Block Percentage is proportion of analysis time (1 hour) the storage lane or through lane is blocked or blocking. 3. Multiple storage lanes of different length are averaged together to show the "Effective Storage Length" per lane.PM Peak Hour HCS7 Interchanges Results Summary General Information Interchange Information Agency SEH Inc.Interchange Type Diverging Diamond Analyst GTJ Analysis Date Jul 12, 2021 Segment Distance, ft Jurisdiction City of Edina Duration, h 0.250 Freeway Direction Intersection East Ramp PHF 0.92 Arterial Direction East-West File Name 2040 Build DDI Analysis AM.xus Project Description Demand EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Intersection One Demand ( v ), veh/h 540 719 1 709 624 0 171 0 329 Intersection Two Demand ( v ), veh/h 1 878 425 424 614 0 381 0 307 Signal One Information Green Yellow Red 33.5 33.5 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Cycle, s 80.0 Offset, s 0 Uncoordinated No Force Mode Fixed Signal Two Information Green Yellow Red 33.5 33.5 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Cycle, s 80.0 Offset, s 0 Uncoordinated No Force Mode Fixed Interchange Results O-D PHF-Adjusted Demand (veh/h) Movement Control Delay Components Total Control Delay (s/veh) Extra Distance (ft) EDTT (s/veh) ETT (s/veh) LOS A 334 NBL M3 + M5 26.6 100 1.9 28.5 B B 414 NBR M4 15.0 -100 -1.9 13.1 A C 358 SBR M8 17.2 -100 -1.9 15.3 B D 186 SBL M7 + M1 22.3 100 1.9 24.3 B E 1 EBL M6 19.7 100 1.9 21.6 B F 0 EBR N/A 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 A G 0 WBR N/A 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 A H 1 WBL M2 18.4 100 1.9 20.4 B I 780 EBT M6 + M1 27.2 40 0.8 28.0 B J 666 WBT M2 + M5 28.3 40 0.8 29.1 B M ---------------- N ---------------- Interchange ETT (s/veh) and LOS 24.2 B Signalized Intersection One Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Control Delay ( d ) , s/veh 22.0 19.7 6.4 9.9 12.2 0.0 14.8 0.0 17.2 Level of Service (LOS)C B A A B B B Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 20.7 C 11.0 B 14.8 B 17.2 B Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 16.5 B Signalized Intersection Two Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Control Delay ( d ) , s/veh 4.9 7.5 7.0 18.5 18.4 0.0 15.0 0.0 16.7 Level of Service (LOS)A A A B B B B Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 7.3 A 18.4 B 15.0 B 16.7 B Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 14.0 B Interchange Graphic Copyright © 2021 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved.HCS™ Streets Version 7.9.5 Generated: 7/13/2021 10:19:07 AM HCS7 Interchanges Results Summary General Information Interchange Information Agency SEH Inc.Interchange Type Diverging Diamond Analyst GTJ Analysis Date Jul 12, 2021 Segment Distance, ft Jurisdiction City of Edina Duration, h 0.250 Freeway Direction Intersection East Ramp PHF 0.92 Arterial Direction East-West File Name 2040 Build DDI Analysis PM.xus Project Description Demand EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Intersection One Demand ( v ), veh/h 434 1306 1 881 362 0 193 0 312 Intersection Two Demand ( v ), veh/h 1 1056 488 343 850 0 684 0 451 Signal One Information Green Yellow Red 38.5 38.5 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Cycle, s 90.0 Offset, s 0 Uncoordinated No Force Mode Fixed Signal Two Information Green Yellow Red 38.5 38.5 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Cycle, s 90.0 Offset, s 0 Uncoordinated No Force Mode Fixed Interchange Results O-D PHF-Adjusted Demand (veh/h) Movement Control Delay Components Total Control Delay (s/veh) Extra Distance (ft) EDTT (s/veh) ETT (s/veh) LOS A 490 NBL M3 + M5 36.1 100 1.9 38.1 C B 743 NBR M4 18.8 -100 -1.9 16.8 B C 339 SBR M8 18.3 -100 -1.9 16.3 B D 210 SBL M7 + M1 32.0 100 1.9 33.9 C E 1 EBL M6 46.7 100 1.9 48.6 C F 0 EBR N/A 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 A G 0 WBR N/A 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 A H 1 WBL M2 23.1 100 1.9 25.0 B I 1418 EBT M6 + M1 62.1 40 0.8 62.9 D J 923 WBT M2 + M5 36.1 40 0.8 36.9 C M ---------------- N ---------------- Interchange ETT (s/veh) and LOS 40.5 C Signalized Intersection One Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Control Delay ( d ) , s/veh 20.3 46.7 6.8 13.0 9.7 0.0 16.5 0.0 18.3 Level of Service (LOS)C D A B A B B Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 40.1 D 12.0 B 16.5 B 18.3 B Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 26.6 C Signalized Intersection Two Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Control Delay ( d ) , s/veh 9.7 15.5 15.7 18.6 23.1 0.0 18.8 0.0 23.1 Level of Service (LOS)A B B B C B C Approach Delay, s/veh / LOS 15.6 B 21.8 C 18.8 B 23.1 C Intersection Delay, s/veh / LOS 19.0 B Interchange Graphic Copyright © 2021 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved.HCS™ Streets Version 7.9.5 Generated: 7/13/2021 10:15:09 AM Appendix C Design Layouts EDEN AVENUEOPTION 1EDEN AVENUEOPTION 2W 50TH STNB TH 100SB TH 100 EDEN AVE DALE D R GRANGE RDEDEN AVEWILLSONRD 050100EDEN AVENUERECOMMENDED CONCEPTFILE NO.DATE:9/9/2021 W 50TH STNB TH 100SB TH 100 EDEN AVE DALE D R GRANGE RDEDEN AVEWILLSONRD 050100DOG BONE ROUNDABOUTCONCEPTFILE NO.DATE:9/9/2021 50TH STREETOPTION 150TH STREETOPTION 2W 50TH STEDEN AVE GRANGE RD DALE D R 050100FILE NO.DATE:9/9/2021W 50TH STREETRECOMMENDED CONCEPT W 50TH STDALE D R 02040W 50TH STREETBUFFERED BIKE LANESCONCEPTFILE NO.DATE:9/9/2021 W 50TH STEDEN AVE GRANGE RD DALE D R 050100W 50TH STREET2016 GRANDVIEW STUDYCONCEPTFILE NO.DATE:9/9/2021 XC XC XC X C XC XC XC X C X C XC XCXC PEDESTRIAN BRIDGECHAIN LINK FENCEPOTENTIAL CONNECTION TOFUTURE TH100 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGEW 50TH STEDEN AVE DALE D RGRANGE RD03060GRANGE ROADREALIGNMENT CONCEPTFILE NO.DATE:9/9/2021 W 50TH STNB TH 100SB TH 100EDEN AVEWILLSON RDGRANGE RDEDEN AVEARCADIA AVEVERNON AVEDALE DR0100200SPLIT OFFSET SPUIINTERCHANGE CONCEPTFILE NO.DATE:9/9/2021 W 50TH STNB TH 100SB TH 100EDEN AVEWILLSON RDGRANGE RDEDEN AVEARCADIA AVEVERNON AVEDALE DR0100200SPLIT DIAMONDINTERCHANGE CONCEPTFILE NO.DATE:9/9/2021 W 50TH STNB TH 100SB TH 100EDEN AVEWILLSON RDGR ANG E R D EDEN AVEARCADIA AVEVERNON AVEOPTION 2KEEP EXISTING NB OFF RAMPW/O PROPOSED OFF RAMP060120DIVERGING DIAMONDINTERCHANGE CONCEPTFILE NO.DATE:9/9/2021 FUTURE TH100PEDESTRIAN BRIDGEW 50TH STNB TH 100 SB TH 100 EDEN AVEGRANG E R D ARCADIAAVE 04080TH-100 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGECONCEPTFILE NO.DATE:9/9/2021 Sustainable buildings, sound infrastructure, safe transportation systems, clean water, renewable energy and a balanced environment. Building a Better World for All of Us communicates a company-wide commitment to act in the best interests of our clients and the world around us. We’re confident in our ability to balance these requirements. The CITY ofEDINAEast Grandview Transportation Study City Council Meeting November 3, 2021 Chad Millner –Engineering Director The CITY ofEDINA •4917 Eden Ave –Development Condition “requiring satisfactory plan for resolution of transportation system issues east of Highway 100 in the Grandview district by the City” •Goals of Study: Improve safety for all modes, traffic operations, pedestrian access and reduce the complexity of the existing roadway network. www.EdinaMN.gov 2 Background The CITY ofEDINA •Transportation System Issues –Study Findings No Data Supported Safety Issues –17 typical, minor accidents Traffic Operates at Acceptable Levels Some normal delays / inconvenience Gaps, Barriers and Experience (lack of blvds) Pedestrian and Bicycling Facilities •Concepts •Staff believes goal of study has been met -improve safety for all modes •Final design details and feedback www.EdinaMN.gov 3 Background The CITY ofEDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 4 Concepts •Ped Space and Safety •Slows Traffic •Reduces Queuing •Shorter Crossings •Single Lane The CITY ofEDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 5 Concepts •Ped Space and Safety •Slows Traffic -narrower •Shorter Crossings •Single Lane •East side sidewalk? The CITY ofEDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 6 Concepts •Ped Space and Safety •Slows Traffic •Narrower lanes •Barrier curb •Reduces conflicts 32 to 10 •Refuge islands for left turns •Traffic Signal Improvements •Dedicated left •Controlled right –NB The CITY ofEDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 7 Resident Feedback •12 survey forms submitted on BTE •Please improve pedestrian network •Condition not met •Concepts should do more, start at Wooddale, need regional improvements, concerns with right out only at Dale •Sight lines and vegetation, Sunnyslope Rd East •Schedule sooner rather than later The CITY ofEDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 8 ETC Feedback •Final Design Suggestions •Traffic signal at Grange and the U-turn •Grange Rd shared-use path and freeway ramps •Temp bike and ped over Highway 100 •Further study on Eden Ave bike lanes The CITY ofEDINA •3 Underlined Items = $2.8M -$4.2M www.EdinaMN.gov 9 Concepts Estimates –Street Only Description Low Cost High Cost 50th Street –Grange to east of Dale $1,400,000 $2,200,000 50th Street –east of Dale to Eden $1,100,000 $1,600,000 Eden –TH100 to PD Drwy (Roundabouts)$1,100,000 $1,600,000 Eden –PD Drwy to 50th $600,000 $860,000 Grange Road Pedestrian Improvements $245,000 $370,000 Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI)$5,000,000 $7,200,000 TH100 Pedestrian Bridge $2,900,000 $4,300,000 The CITY ofEDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 10 Funding / Schedule •2025 (as planned) TIF collections start •When to move street improvements to final design and construction? What is the financial risk to the City? •Financial –Options to fund project sooner, interfund loans •Staff’s opinion •Risk is low -construction framing or the building is going up •Fall 2022 -Winter 2023 •Final design street improvements -phased The CITY ofEDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 11 Schedule •2022 West Grandview -Eden Arcadia Roundabout •2023 (hints of 2024) Vernon Ave Bridge •2023 East Grandview -Eden Roundabouts and Grange Rd •2025 50th Street •Time for final design details and community feedback •Consider adjustments to concept •Mill & overlay scheduled –Wooddale to Eden •2022 Review adjustments to lane striping –Wooddale to Grange The CITY ofEDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 12 Questions? Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: VIII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution 2021-105 Approving Spending Plan for Southdale 2, Pentagon Park and 70th & Cahill Tax Increment Financing Districts Discussion CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Close the public hearing at noon on November 8, 2021 and continue action to the November 16, 2021 City Council meeting. INTRODUCTION: This items pertains to a spending plan for unobligated monies collected in the Pentagon P ark, 70th & Cahill and Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Districts. Recent changes in Minnesota statute allows cities greater flexibility to spend unallocated monies to support redevelopment and housing efforts. A Spending Plan and related Policy has been prepared for future consideration by the City Council, after input has been obtained via a Public Hearing. T he Edina HRA considered this Spending Plan and proposed Policy on October 28, 2021. No formal action is requested on November 3. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution 2021-105: Approving Spending Plan for TIF Districts Staff Presentation: Approving Spending Plant for TIF Districts Spending Plan Policy for Spending Plan Assistance Staff Presentation CITY OF EDINA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA Councilmember ______________________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 2021-105 APPROVING A SPENDING PLAN FOR THE SOUTHDALE 2, PENTAGON PARK AND 70th AND CAHILL TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Background; Findings. 1.01. The City and the Board of Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA") have heretofore established the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area (the "Project Area") and adopted a Redevelopment Plan therefor, and established the Southdale 2, Pentagon Park and 70th and Cahill Tax Increment Financing Districts (the “Districts”) therein and adopted Tax Increment Financing Plans (the “TIF Plans”) therefor. 1.02. Subject to the approval of the City Council following a public hearing, the HRA has adopted a spending plan for the TIF Districts in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subd. 4n in the form submitted to the City Council by the HRA (the “Spending Plan”) to utilize existing tax increment revenues from the TIF Districts in order to stimulate construction or substantial rehabilitation of private development in a way that will also create or retain jobs. 1.03. The HRA and City have performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the adoption and approval of the proposed Spending Plan, including, but not limited to, adoption of the Spending Plan by the HRA on October 28, 2021 and the holding of a public hearing upon published notice as required by law. Section 2. Approval of the Spending Plan and Program Policy. 2.01. The Council hereby reaffirms the original findings for the Project Area and TIF Districts. 2.02. In addition, the City makes the following findings: (a) The adoption of the Spending Plan conforms in all respects to the requirement of the Act and will help fulfill a need to develop an area of the City which is already built up, to create or retain jobs within the State, provide housing opportunities, to improve the tax based and to improve the general economy of the State and thereby serves a public purpose. Resolution 2021-105 Page 2 (b) The development and redevelopment efforts requiring assistance, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and therefor the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. Section 3. Approval of the Spending Plan and Program Policy; Filing. 3.01. The Spending Plan for the TIF Districts, as presented to the Council on this date, including without limitation the findings and statements of objectives contained therein, are hereby approved, ratified, established, and adopted and shall be placed on file in the office of the HRA Executive Director. 3.02. The HRA, staff of the City, the City's advisors and legal counsel are authorized and directed to proceed with the implementation of the Spending Plan and to negotiate, draft, prepare and present to this Council for its consideration all further plans, resolutions, documents and contracts necessary for this purpose. 3.03 The HRA Executive Director is authorized and directed to file a copy of the Spending Plan with the Office of the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.176, Subd. 4n. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council member ______________________, and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: _________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ and the following voted against the same: _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ Dated: November 16, 2021 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor (Seal) Resolution 2021-105 Page 3 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of November 16, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of________________________, 2021. _______________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk The CITYofEDINASpending Plan for Southdale 2, Pentagon Park, and 70th& Cahill Tax Increment Financing DistrictsPublic HearingEdina City CouncilNovember 3, 2021www.EdinaMN.gov The CITYofEDINA2Background•New Minnesota Legislation allows cities to use unallocated TIF monies that have not already been obligated•Intended to accelerate the economic recovery after the COVID-19 pandemic•Intended to create new jobs•Intended to promote new private investment The CITYofEDINA3Background•Edina has 3 TIF accounts with unallocated monies that are eligible for this new MN Statute:•- Pentagon Park (approx. $700,000)•- Southdale 2 (approx. $8,600,000)•- 70th& Cahill (approx. $350,000)•-TOTAL approx. $9,650,000 The CITYofEDINA4How can Funds be UsedTIF monies can fill gap in private development projects including:-New construction or substantial rehabilitation of existing-Private improvements or related public improvements-Loan, grant or equity investmentNOT for public buildings or parksNOT for general public improvementsgap The CITYofEDINA5What must be achieved with Funds•Each project MUST deliver new construction or substantial rehabilitation of brick and mortar structures•Each project MUST create jobs, including (at a minimum) construction jobs•Each project MUST be determined to be unable to proceed without public funding•Each project SHOULD deliver benefits to the general public gap The CITYofEDINA6When can Funds be Used•Hold Public Hearing Nov 3rd•- Consider approval Nov 16th•Spending Plan must be approved no later than 12/31/2022•Projects must be completed by 12/31/2025•Any unused funds must be returned to the original TIF account OR be redistributed to the County, City and Schools in 2026gap The CITYofEDINA7Recommended Process•Two step process1st– adopt Spending Plan and approve Policy2nd- consider qualified projects on case-by-case basis•Be strategic in the type and location of approved projects•Seek to maximize private investment and create strong economic conditions throughout the commercial areas•Comply with applicable State rules and regulations, including reporting The CITYofEDINA8Type of Projects to ConsiderUnder the general terms of the proposed Spending Plan and proposed Policy, many different types of projects could be considered in the future. Examples include:•Renovation of vacant commercial buildings•Construction of new commercial or multi-family buildings•Improvements to public roadways, parking facilities and related infrastructure that hinder private investment The CITYofEDINASummary2021 Minnesota Statutes enables unallocated TIF monies to be reinvested to pursue private development and create jobsEdina has 3 TIF Districts with $9.65 M of unallocated moniesStaff recommends that the Spending Plan be adopted in 2021Staff recommends that Policy be approved to guide project selectionStaff further recommends that prospective projects be identified in 2021-2022 so that work can be completed by the 2025 deadline9 The CITYofEDINA10Questions / Discussion Julie Blaha State Auditor STATE OF MINNESOTA Suite 500 525 Park Street Saint Paul, MN 55103 New: August 2021 Main: (651) 296-2551 Fax: (651) 296-4755 TTY: (800) 627-3529 State.Auditor@ osa.state.mn.us www.osa.state.mn.us An equal opportunity employer Statement of Position Temporary Transfer Authority (2021 Law) Tax increment revenue may be spent only as permitted by the Tax Increment Financing Act (TIF Act).1 In 2021, the Legislature enacted expanded, temporary authority to transfer unobligated tax increments for purposes of assisting private development consisting of the construction or substantial rehabilitation of buildings and ancillary facilities, if doing so will create or retain jobs in the state.2 Proposed amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, the enacted law is narrower than initially proposed and is similar to 2010 legislation that temporarily expanded the use of TIF with the aim of stimulating economic recovery after the Great Recession.3 Authority, Purposes The new law temporarily permits a development authority to elect, by resolution, to transfer unobligated increment for certain specified purposes. The new law does not, however, override requirements to pay bonds to which increments are pledged. Any transfer under this provision must be for the purpose of assisting private development that meets all of the following criteria: (1) it consists of the construction or substantial rehabilitation of buildings and ancillary facilities; (2) it creates or retains jobs in the state, including construction jobs; and (3) construction commences before December 31, 2025, and would not have commenced before that date without the assistance.4 Developments that would already commence construction prior to December 31, 2025, or those that do not add or retain jobs in the state, would not be permitted beneficiaries of the transfer. Transfers must provide the assistance in one or both of the following ways: (1) by providing improvements, loans, interest rate subsidies, or assistance in any form to the private development; or 1 The TIF Act is found at Minn. Stat. §§ 469.174 to 460.1794. 2 Minn. Stat. § 469.176, subd. 4n, as enacted by 2021 Minn. Laws, 1st Spec. Sess., ch. 14, art. 9 sec. 1. 3 The 2021 enacted provision does not include transfers to the general fund, nor more-generalized support for businesses impacted by the pandemic, as was initially entertained. While similar to the 2010 Jobs Stimulus provision, additional details are included. For information about the 2010 provision, see the separate TIF Jobs Stimulus Program statement of position on our website. 4 Minn. Stat. § 469.176, subd. 4n(a). New: August 2021 2 (2) by making an equity or similar investment in a corporation, partnership, or limited liability company that the authority determines is necessary to make construction of a development financially feasible.5 In order to demonstrate compliance with the new provision, an authority may wish to include affirmation of the qualifications in the written resolution electing to make the transfer. The authority also should keep documentation that demonstrates that the development created or retained jobs in the state and that commencement of construction by December 31, 2025, depended on the transfer. Approvals and Spending Plans Prior to approving the use of this temporary transfer authority by resolution, a development authority must also create a written spending plan that authorizes the development authority to provide the assistance or make the investment that makes the development qualify.6 The plan must detail the use of transferred increment.7 The OSA recommends identifying planned expenditures using the same categories identified in TIF plans and TIF reporting (e.g., acquisition, site preparation, financing costs, etc.), except for a category for administrative expenses, because administrative expenses are not included in the permissible uses of the transferred increment in the new law. The municipality (which may or not be the same as the development authority) must also approve the authority’s spending plan after holding a public hearing.8 The municipality must publish notice of the hearing in a newspaper of general circulation in the municipality and on the municipality’s public website at least ten days, but not more than 30 days, prior to the date of the hearing.9 An authority making a transfer under this authority must provide a copy of the spending plan approved and signed by the municipality to the Office of the State Auditor.10 Plans should be emailed to TIF@osa.state.mn.us as soon as possible after their approval. Parameters and Limitations The authority to transfer increments under this provision expires on December 31, 2022.11 Amounts being transferred under this provision must be transferred from the fund or account in which tax increments are segregated and into a separate fund or account by December 31, 2022. Amounts must not be expended directly from the transferring TIF fund or account, and may not be spent after December 31, 2022, if they remain in the TIF district’s fund or account at that time.12 All transfers must be spent by December 31, 2025.13 5 Id. 6 Minn. Stat. § 469.176, subd. 4n(c). 7 Id. 8 Id. A city’s housing and redevelopment authority or economic development authority, for example, may be the development authority while the city itself is the municipality. 9 Id. 10 Minn. Stat. § 469.176, subd. 4n(e). 11 Minn. Stat. § 469.176, subd. 4n(f). 12Minn. Stat. § 469.177, subd. 5, requires an authority to segregate tax increment received with respect to any district in a special account or accounts on its official books and records. This authority allows transfers out of such accounts as opposed to expenditures from within these accounts. 13 Minn. Stat. § 469.176, subd. 4n(f). New: August 2021 3 Transfers from a TIF district in calendar years 2021 and 2022 are limited to a maximum transfer equal to the excess of the district’s unobligated increment.14 Under the provision, unobligated increment includes any increment not required for payment of obligations due during the six months following the transfer on outstanding bonds, binding contracts, and other outstanding financial obligations of the district to which the district’s increment is pledged.15 Therefore, the transfer of increment for 2021 is limited to the eligible balance of tax increment at the end of 2020, less amounts needed to pay bonds, pay-as-you-go notes, and interfund loans due from January 1, 2021, to June 30, 2021. Similarly, the transfer of increment for 2022 is limited to the eligible balance of tax increment at the end of 2021, less amounts needed to pay bonds, pay-as-you-go notes, and interfund loans due from January 1, 2022, to June 30, 2022. Presumably, receipts of tax increment for the first half taxes in each year would be used to make payments on outstanding obligations due in the second half of each year, but note that this authority does not provide any exception to pay those obligations to which tax increment is pledged, and an authority should not transfer amounts that might impair their ability to make payments on those obligations. Increment that is improperly retained, received, spent, or transferred is not eligible for transfer under this authority.16 Therefore, the 2020 and 2021 balances of tax increment should be carefully evaluated prior to making transfers in 2021 and 2022, respectively. For example, excess increment calculated for 2019 that might remain in the TIF fund after it should have been returned by September 30, 2020, would not be eligible for transfer, nor would any subsequent excess increment be eligible for a transfer after it should have been returned. Likewise, if a district receives tax increment after it should have decertified under the Six-Year Rule, such amounts of increment would also not be eligible for transfer. Unspent Transfers Increment not spent by December 31, 2025, must be returned to the fund(s) of the contributing TIF district(s).17 The distribution of returned amounts need not be proportional to the amount contributed, but the amount returned to each TIF district must not exceed the amount transferred from the district. 14 Minn. Stat. § 469.176, subd. 4n(b). 15 Id. Interfund loans are included in the definition of “bonds” in the TIF Act (see Minn. Stat. § 469.174, subd. 3), so payments on interfund loans should not be foregone to increase a transfer under this authority. 16 Minn. Stat. § 469.176, subd. 4n(d). 17 Minn. Stat. § 469.176, subd. 4n(f). ☒City Council Approved: Click here to enter a date. ☐City-Wide Revised: Click here to enter a date. ☐Department City of Edina Policy Policy for Use of Unobligated Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Funds OVERVIEW The purpose of this Policy is to identify goals and establish guidelines pertaining to the City’s use of its unobligated TIF cash balances for financial assistance to stimulate private construction and rehabilitation projects that create jobs. The use of these unobligated TIF balances is responsive to 2021 Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176 subdivision 4n. This policy shall be used as a guide for unallocated TIF monies available under the City’s approved Spending Plan and seeks to invest these monies to enable additional private investment that creates jobs and also delivers benefits to the general public. Pursuant to the TIF Act, the purpose of these expenditures is to spur construction, expansion, or rehabilitation of commercial, industrial, or mixed-use buildings and supporting infrastructure within the City’s commercial and industrial districts so as to create or retain local jobs and stimulate additional private investment in the City. This policy is intended to be in effect upon approval and to expire December 31, 2025, unless changed by Minnesota Statute. SPENDING PLAN FOR UNALLOCATED TAX INCREMENT A Spending Plan has been prepared to formalize the use of unobligated incremental property taxes in accordance with the 2021 Minnesota Statutes. This Spending Plan identifies approximately $9,650,000 of unallocated monies generated from three existing TIF Districts located within the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area: Southdale 2, Pentagon Park and 70th/Cahill. Any funds utilized under this provision must be expended by December 31, 2025, unless that date is modified by State Law. CONSIDERATION OF PROJECTS Each project will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the qualifications identified in Minnesota Statute, the Spending Plan and this Policy. The HRA retains the right to evaluate projects under this Program as it sees fit to meet the overall objectives of the TIF Act. This policy outlines how funds will be provided for qualified construction activities. Assistance will be considered upon evidence that construction would not have occurred without such assistance and alternatives for financing are not feasible. DRAFT Policy for Use of Unobligated TIF Funds Page 2 POTENTIAL PROJECTS The types of projects to be funded include but are not limited to the following: renovation of existing buildings and construction of new buildings, including public improvements directly related to the renovations and construction. Examples might include: renovations of theaters and restaurants, construction of new commercial facilities, renovation for business incubators or business accelerators, construction of public parking, public sidewalks or public utilities that serve the private investments. These funds can also be used for housing, if jobs are created. PUBLIC BENEFITS FROM PRIVATE INVESTMENT Projects shall stimulate private investment while also creating benefits to the general public. At a minimum, these public benefits should include:  Growth or stabilization of property tax base,  Creation of construction jobs and/or permanent jobs  Reoccupy a vacant facility (or portion thereof) or construct a new facility for occupancy Funded Projects should also include at least one of the following:  Preservation or restoration of historic and culturally significant sites and elements  Public improvements that are identified in the City’s Capital Improvement Plan or similar planning document  Public easements for non-motorized vehicles or mass transit  Conservation easements to protect established trees or wetlands, where applicable  Easements for public plazas with combination of landscape, hardscape and public art that is owned and maintained by private owners, or  Easements for public parking that is owned and maintained by private owners If applicable to the scope of work, funded Projects should also:  Remediate environmental contaminants  Apply sustainable design and construction practices to reduce the carbon footprint or to reduce greenhouse gas emissions BUSINESS SUBSIDY All projects approved pursuant to this policy that constitute a business subsidy under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 116J.993 through 116J.995, as amended, will be subject to the City’s Business Subsidy Policy. FINANCIAL REPORTING The expenditure of unallocated tax increment shall be reported as required by Minnesota Law and in the format required by the Minnesota Office of the State Auditor (OSA) and any other required financial audits or reports. Reviewed by Edina HRA: October 28, 2021 The CITY ofEDINA Spending Plan for Southdale 2, Pentagon Park, and 70th & Cahill Tax Increment Financing Districts Public Hearing Edina City Council November 3, 2021 www.EdinaMN.gov The CITY ofEDINA 2 Background •New Minnesota Legislation allows cities to use unallocated TIF monies that have not already been obligated •Intended to accelerate the economic recovery after the COVID-19 pandemic •Intended to create new jobs •Intended to promote new private investment The CITY ofEDINA 3 Background •Edina has 3 TIF accounts with unallocated monies that are eligible for this new MN Statute: •-Pentagon Park (approx. $700,000) •-Southdale 2 (approx. $8,600,000) •-70th & Cahill (approx. $350,000) •-TOTAL approx. $9,650,000 The CITY ofEDINA 4 How can Funds be Used TIF monies can fill gap in private development projects including: -New construction or substantial rehabilitation of existing -Private improvements or related public improvements -Loan, grant or equity investment NOT for public buildings or parks NOT for general public improvements gap The CITY ofEDINA 5 What must be achieved with Funds •Each project MUST deliver new construction or substantial rehabilitation of brick and mortar structures •Each project MUST create jobs, including (at a minimum) construction jobs •Each project MUST be determined to be unable to proceed without public funding •Each project SHOULD deliver benefits to the general public gap The CITY ofEDINA 6 When can Funds be Used •Hold Public Hearing Nov 3rd •-Consider approval Nov 16th •Spending Plan must be approved no later than 12/31/2022 •Projects must be completed by 12/31/2025 •Any unused funds must be returned to the original TIF account OR be redistributed to the County, City and Schools in 2026 gap The CITY ofEDINA 7 Recommended Process •Two step process 1st –adopt Spending Plan and approve Policy 2nd -consider qualified projects on case-by- case basis •Be strategic in the type and location of approved projects •Seek to maximize private investment and create strong economic conditions throughout the commercial areas •Comply with applicable State rules and regulations, including reporting The CITY ofEDINA 8 Type of Projects to Consider Under the general terms of the proposed Spending Plan and proposed Policy, many different types of projects could be considered in the future. Examples include: •Renovation of vacant commercial buildings •Construction of new commercial or multi-family buildings •Improvements to public roadways, parking facilities and related infrastructure that hinder private investment The CITY ofEDINASummary 2021 Minnesota Statutes enables unallocated TIF monies to be reinvested to pursue private development and create jobs Edina has 3 TIF Districts with $9.65 M of unallocated monies Staff recommends that the Spending Plan be adopted in 2021 Staff recommends that Policy be approved to guide project selection Staff further recommends that prospective projects be identified in 2021-2022 so that work can be completed by the 2025 deadline 9 The CITY ofEDINA 10 Questions / Discussion Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: VIII.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2021-103 & Ordinance No. 2021-13: Zoning Ordinance Amendment and Revised Overall Development Plan for the US Bank Site at 7001 and 7025 France Avenue Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Close the Public Hearing at noon on November 8, 2021, and continue action to November 16, 2021. INTRODUCTION: The City Council is asked to consider a proposal for a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to revise the previously approved plans for this site (PUD-17) which was approved in June of 2021. (See the attached approved plans.) The approved plans were to tear down the existing 66,200 square foot office and bank, and build the following: A one-story, 24-foot tall 6,500 s.f. US Bank with drive-through (Phase 1); A 24-Story, 282-foot tall 270-unit apartment with 5,000 s.f. of retail; A 10-story, 146-foot tall, 190,000 s.f. office/retail building; and A 9-story, 90-foot, 110-unit apartment building. The revised plans have slightly reduced the size of the project by eliminating the 9-story apartment building to build the following (See the attached approved plans.): A one-story, 24-foot tall 6,500 s.f. US Bank with drive-through (Phase 1-no changes proposed to the bank); A 24-Story, 270-foot tall 267-unit apartment with 1,500 s.f. of retail; A 6-7-story, 105-foot tall, 189,430 s.f. office/retail building; and An 8 level, freestanding 540-stall parking ramp with a 1,300 s.f bike facility. The request requires: A Zoning Ordinance Amendment to revise the P UD-17 Zoning District; and An amendment to the Overall Development Plan. ATTACHMENTS: Description Ordinance No. 2021-13 Resolution No. 2021-103 (Approval) Resolution No. 2021-103 (Denial) Planning Commission Staff Report - October 13, 2021 Engineering Memo - Transportation, Sustainability and Engineering Chief Building Official Memo Better Together Public Hearing Comments AFO Review Sustainability Questionnaire Updated Traffic and Parking Study Previous Traffic and Parking Study Previously Approved Plans Previously Approved Elevations Applicant Narrative & Renderings 1 of 4 Applicant Narrative & Renderings 2 of 4 Applicant Narrative & Renderings 3 of 4 Applicant Narrative & Renderings 4 of 4 Proposed Plans (Prelim) 1 of 3 Proposed Plans (Prelim) 2 of 3 Proposed Plans (Prelim) 3 of 3 Staff Presentation Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX ORDINANCE NO. 2021-13 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE PUD-20, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-20, AT 7001 AND 7025 FRANCE AVENUE The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended to add the following: Sec. 36-504 Planned Unit Development District-20 (PUD-20) – 70th and France (a) Legal description: Lot 1, Block 1, except that part thereof which lies Northwesterly of a line drawn from a point on the North line of Section 32, Township 28, Range 24 distant 110 feet Easterly of the Northwest corner of said section to a point on the West line thereof distant 110 feet Southerly of said Northwest corner; Lot 2, Block 1, except the Eastly 70 feet thereof; Yorktown, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Torrens Property: Certificate of Title No. 1077413) (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans, including the master development plan for the site received by the City on January 25 and June 4, 2021 _____________except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2021-21 on file in the Office of the Planning Department. (c) Principal Uses: All uses allowed in the PCD-3 Zoning District All uses allowed in the PCD-3 Zoning District Multifamily Residential Office (d) Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the PCD-3 Zoning District. All accessory uses allowed in the PCD-3 Zoning District (e) Conditional Uses: All conditional uses allowed in the PCD-3 Zoning District. All conditional uses allowed in the PCD-3 Zoning District Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 2 (f) Development Standards. In addition to the development standards per the PCD- 3 Zoning District, the following shall apply: Building Setbacks Front – France Avenue Front – 70th Street Side – East Side – South 50 feet – Lot 1 (measured to the curb) 40 feet – Lot 4* (see (i) below) 18-28 feet 35 feet 10 feet Building Height 1, 9, 10 , 7, 8 & 24 stories Density 67 units per acre Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 2.1% Parking 1,170 1,112 spaces total (23 for the bank) (g) Signs shall be regulated per the POD-2 Zoning District for the office uses and PCD-3 for retail uses, and PRD, for the residential uses. In addition, the wall signs shown on the final development plans for the building on Lot 1 shall be allowed. (h) The residential housing on the site shall comply with the City’s New Multi- Family Affordable Housing Policy in place as of December 2020. (i) Any future construction on Lot 4, after the construction of US Bank with a 40- foot setback to France Avenue, must comply with the 50-foot setback requirement from France Avenue. Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 3 ATTEST: ______________________________ _____________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of ________, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of ____________, 2021. ________________________________ City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2021-103 APPROVING A ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT AND REVISED OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 7001 AND 7025 FRANCE AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Mortenson is proposing to redevelop the property at the corner of 70th and France Avenue (7001 and 7025 France Avenue) 1.02 An Overall Development and Ordinance Amendment establishing the PUD-20 District were approved by the City Council on June 15, 2021. 1.03 Mortenson is requesting a revision to the approved plans to tear down the existing 66,200 square foot office and bank, and build the following:  A one-story, 24-foot tall 6,500 s.f. US Bank with drive-through (Phase 1-no changes proposed to the bank);  A 24-Story, 270-foot tall 267-unit apartment with 1,500 s.f. of retail;  A 6-7-story, 105-foot tall, 189,430 s.f. office/retail building; and  An 8 level, freestanding 540-stall parking ramp with a 1,300 s.f bike facility. 1.04 To accommodate the request, the following is requested:  A Zoning Ordinance Amendment to revise the PUD-20 Zoning District; and  An amendment to the Overall Development Plan. 1.05 On October 13, 2021, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended denial of the Request. Vote: 6 Ayes and 1 Nays. 1.05 On November 3rd, 2021, 2020 the City Council held a public hearing and considered the request. 1.06 On November 16, 2021 the City Council granted approval of the requests. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses, and density are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposal still meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The PUD zoning would: RESOLUTION NO. 2021-103 Page 2 a. Promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City. c. Provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses. d. Project is of high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned. e. Maintains the efficiency of public streets and utilities. f. Provides a mixture of land uses within the development. g. Project would meet the City’s affordable housing policy. 3. The PUD would ensure that the development proposed would be the only building that would be allowed on the site unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 4. The pedestrian experience along Ewing would be improved compared to the approved plan with the elimination of the parking garage entrances on both sides of the street. There would be no car/pedestrian conflict along these sidewalks. 5. Addresses the Greater Southdale Area Design Experience Guidelines. The following principles are included:  The division of the property into smaller blocks and the provision of pedestrian and vehicle access and connections through the site to adjacent properties to the east and south.  Close conformity to the street typologies  No visible surface parking stalls from 70th or France Avenue.  The provision of public space that makes up 26% of the site. This includes 1.2 acres consisting of the internal sidewalks and drive aisles, a 7,500 square foot public/park space east of the retail/office stie. 6. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern present in much of the city will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. i. Provide visual screening and privacy to buffer cars from people, provide visual relief and allow stormwater infiltration in parking lots. ii. Evaluate current parking standards in order to encourage shared parking and minimize the visual impact of surface parking. iii. Landscaping is essential to screen parking areas, buffer adjacent residential uses and create a pedestrian-friendly environment along streets. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-103 Page 3 iv. Encourage the development of parking lots or structures so they can be shared by more than one building on the site or by buildings on neighboring sites, and which can transition over time to other uses if parking needs change. b. Encourage successful mixed-use development. c. Ensure that public realm design respects community character, supports of commercial and mixed-use development, promotes community identity, and creates high quality experiences for pedestrians, cyclists, transit users, and motorists. 7. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. Wenck Consulting conducted a traffic and parking impact study and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. The project would generate 40% fewer daily trips, therefore would have less impact on traffic operation than originally anticipated in the 2020 traffic study done by Spack Consulting. 8. The proposed uses would be an upgrade to development on the site. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves The Ordinance Amendment and Revised Overall Development Plan for PUD-20. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated September 22, 2021. 2. All buildings must comply with City Code Section 36-618 (11) regarding building materials and transparency. 3. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 4. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. 5. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 6. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 7. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-103 Page 4 8. A Developer’s Agreement/Site Improvement Plan Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 9. County approval if necessary, on access to France Avenue. 10. The project must conform to the City’s affordable housing policy. Final determination to be made at final approval. 11. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated October 7, 2021. 12. Compliance with the Spack Consulting Traffic & Parking Study recommendations and the updated Wenck Traffic and Parking Study. 13. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment revising the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 14. Dedication of public access easements of the east-west and north-south sidewalks and drive-aisles through the site and sidewalks around the perimeter of the site including an easement over the future extension of the north-south internal street and sidewalk on the Bank site. 15. Provision of green roofs as shown on the building renderings. 16. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the fire marshal and building official’s memo dated October 7, 2021. 17. Submittal of a construction management plan subject to review and approval of city staff prior to issuance of a building permit. The plan must demonstrate minimal impact to pedestrian and vehicle movement. 18. Hours of construction must be consistent with City Code. 19. Park dedication shall be paid at the time of approval of a building permit for the residential uses. Dedication shall be $5,000 per unit. The value of the 7,500 square foot park/public space shall be considered for a reduction in the total amount. 20. The property owner shall be responsible for the maintenance of internal sidewalks and drive aisles. The City would snow plow a 5-foot path of the sidewalk on 70th and France. The property owners would be responsible for the remaining areas. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on November 16, 2021. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-103 Page 5 ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 16, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2021. _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2021-103 DENYING A ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT AND REVISED OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 7001 AND 7025 FRANCE AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Mortenson is proposing to redevelop the property at the corner of 70th and France Avenue (7001 and 7025 France Avenue) 1.02 An Overall Development and Ordinance Amendment establishing the PUD-20 District were approved by the City Council on June 15, 2021. 1.03 Mortenson is requesting a revision to the approved plans to tear down the existing 66,200 square foot office and bank, and build the following:  A one-story, 24-foot tall 6,500 s.f. US Bank with drive-through (Phase 1-no changes proposed to the bank);  A 24-Story, 270-foot tall 267-unit apartment with 1,500 s.f. of retail;  A 6-7-story, 105-foot tall, 189,430 s.f. office/retail building; and  An 8 level, freestanding 540-stall parking ramp with a 1,300 s.f bike facility 1.04 To accommodate the request, the following is requested:  A Zoning Ordinance Amendment to revise the PUD-20 Zoning District; and  An amendment to the Overall Development Plan. 1.05 On October 13, 2021, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended denial of the Request. Vote: 6 Ayes and 1 Nays. 1.05 On November 3rd, 2021, 2020 the City Council held a public hearing and considered the request. 1.06 On November 16, 2021 the City Council granted approval of the requests. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Does not adequately address the Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines like the originally approved plan did. The streetscape is less active due to more street level parking within the structures, including a parking ramp that does not contain any liner RESOLUTION NO. 2021-103 Page 2 building, building materials don’t meet city code at street level and there is far less building articulation. The street typology on 70th Street has not been followed. 2. The project no longer includes affordable or workforce housing within the development. 3. The proposed project would not meet the criteria for Rezoning to PUD. Section 3. DENIAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, denies the Ordinance Amendment and Revised Overall Development Plan for PUD-20. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on November 16, 2021. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 16, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2021. RESOLUTION NO. 2021-103 Page 3 _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk The Planning Commission is asked to consider a proposal for a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to revise the previously approved plans for this site (PUD-17) which was approved in June of 2021. (See the attached approved plans.) The approved plans were to tear down the existing 66,200 square foot office and bank, and build the following: A one-story, 24-foot tall 6,500 s.f. US Bank with drive-through (Phase 1); A 24-Story, 282-foot tall 270-unit apartment with 5,000 s.f. of retail; A 10-story, 146-foot tall, 190,000 s.f. office/retail building; and A 9-story, 90-foot, 110-unit apartment building. The revised plans have slightly reduced the size of the project by eliminating the 9-story apartment building to build the following (See the attached approved plans.): A one-story, 24-foot tall 6,500 s.f. US Bank with drive-through (Phase 1-no changes proposed to the bank); A 24-Story, 270-foot tall 267-unit apartment with 1,500 s.f. of retail; A 6-7-story, 105-foot tall, 189,430 s.f. office/retail building; and An 8 level, freestanding 540-stall parking ramp with a 1,300 s.f bike facility The request requires: A Zoning Ordinance Amendment to revise the PUD-17 Zoning District; and An amendment to the Overall Development Plan. October 13, 2021 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Revised Overall Development Plan, Site Plan Review for a redevelopment project at 7001 and 7025 France Avenue Information / Background: STAFF REPORT Page 2 SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: The Galleria shopping center; zoned PCD-3, Planned Commercial District, and guided CAC, Community Activity Center (90-150 units per acre). Easterly: Brandon Square Southdale shopping center; zoned PCD-3, Planned Commercial District and guided CAC, Community Activity Center (90-150 units per acre). Southerly: Shopping center; zoned PCD-3, Planned Commercial District and guided CAC, Community Activity Center (90-150 units per acre). Westerly: Commercial uses (Room and Board); zoned PCD-3, Planned Commercial District and PUD, Planned Unit Development and guided OR, Office Residential (20-75 units per acre). Existing Site Features The subject property is 5.8 acres in size, is relatively flat and contains an office building, bank, and large surface parking lot. Planning Guide Plan designation: CAC, Community Activity Center (90-150 units per acre). Zoning: PCD-3, Planned Commercial District Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines - City Goals The development pattern is consistent with the previous plans and does attempt to address the Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines. The following remain the highlights the proposal: The division of the property into smaller blocks and the provision of pedestrian and vehicle access and connections through the site to provide connections to adjacent properties to the east and south (comprises 26% of the entire site); No visible surface parking stalls from 70th or France Avenue; and creating public realm along France and 70th Street and along the internal streets. Mic Johnson, AFO, the City’s consultant on the Greater Southdale Area Vision Plan has reviewed the revised plans and has provided feedback. (See attached AFO review.) Note that Mic does not believe the project has adequately addressed the Guidelines to the extent that the previously approved plans did. The project no longer includes affordable housing in the development, the streetscape is less active due to more street level parking, including a parking ramp that does not contain any liner building, building materials don’t meet city code at street level and there is less building articulation, and the street typology on 70th Street has not been followed. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Parking Based on the proposal for 33,887 square feet of retail, and 155,543 square feet of office space, 780 spaces are required. The 267 total residential units require 267 spaces for parking. Total parking required is 1,085 stalls. The site plan demonstrates 1,112 enclosed stalls (1,135 if the bank is included): 540 stalls in the ramp on Site C; 128 stalls on Site B; and 444 stalls on Site A. Of the 444 stalls on Site A, 317 are designated for the residential uses. Wenck Associates updated the parking study and concluded the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) and locally collected data project a peak parking demand of 695 spaces, and therefore, the proposed parking stalls would accommodate the expected parking demand. (See the previous and updated parking study.) Site Circulation/Traffic Primary vehicular access to the site would remain off France Avenue and 70th Street. Future pedestrian and vehicular access easements would be provided through the site to provide access to the properties to the east and south. This is consistent with the Design Experience Guidelines in the Greater Southdale Area. Pedestrian sidewalks would be provided through and around the perimeter of the site. Interior site circulation will be dramatically improved. Truck loading and unloading would be provided off Drew Avenue and 71st Street. There would be no loading or parking garage access on the newly proposed Ewing Avenue (north-south access road); this would be an improvement over the approved plans which had access to both parking ramps on both sides of the street. Wenck Associates did an update/review of the study done by Spack Consulting as part of the approved project (Spack Consulting no longer performs traffic studies) conducted a traffic study. (See the previous and updated traffic study.) The update concludes that the proposed project would generate 25-40% less traffic. The study further concludes that the northbound right turn lane on France Avenue at 70th Street is not needed in the short term. It may be needed in the future. Future traffic studies with each phase would help determine when that would be needed. The property owner would remain responsible to pay for the above improvements required per the traffic studies. Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, 51 overstory trees would be required. The applicant is proposing 79 overstory trees in the boulevards along the public-streets and the interior private-street. (See attached landscape plan.) A full complement of understory shrubs and bushes are proposed. Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined in their review memo. (See attached memo dated October 7, 2021.) STAFF REPORT Page 4 A Site Improvement Plan Agreement would be required for each final site plan approval. Any approvals of this project would be subject to review and approval of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, as they are the City’s review authority over the grading of the site. Buildings/Building Material The building materials would be a combination primarily glass, with metal panel and composite wood accents. (See attached renderings.) Final building plans would be required to meet the new City Code Section 36-618 as follows: a. All new front building façades in the district that face the public realm must have seventy five percent (75%) transparency (ability to see inside the building) at the ground level. b. All facades on the first vertical 60 feet of a building (above grade) shall use natural materials (brick, stone) facing the public realm (streets, parks, sidewalks). c. No building façade shall be longer than 200 feet without changing direction by a minimum of 90 degrees. d. First floors must have a minimum ceiling height of 20 feet. e. Exceptions may be made to a-d above for an affordable housing project that has over 50% of the units considered to affordable housing as defined in Section 36-612 (1). The proposed plans do not meet standards b and c above, and there is no affordable housing proposed within this development (e). Therefore, staff would recommend that these be made conditions of any approval. When the applicant comes back for final approvals on each phase, they would be required to meet the above standards. Both items B and C are highlighted in Mic Johnson, AFO review memo, dated October 1, 2021. (See attached.) Mechanical Equipment No mechanical equipment has been shown on the plans. Any rooftop and/or ground level equipment would have to be screened if visible from adjacent property lines. Final Plans must include location of mechanical equipment and the means of screening. No ground level mechanical equipment shall be located within the front yard of the development. Signage As with the previous approval, the signage allowed on the site would correspond to the use. The office uses would be subject to sign regulations of an office district; the retail uses would be subject to sign regulations of commercial districts; and the residential uses subject to the planned residential district. This is written into the PUD. Additionally, the proposed signage located above the main entrance on the corner of 70th and France has been written in as acceptable. Living Streets/Multi-Modal Consideration Sec. 36-1274. - Sidewalks, trails and bicycle facilities. STAFF REPORT Page 5 (a) In order to promote and provide safe and effective sidewalks and trails in the city and encourage the use of bicycles for recreation and transportation, the following improvements are required, as a condition of approval, on developments requiring the approval of a final development plan or the issuance of a conditional use permit pursuant to article V of this chapter: (1)It is the policy of the city to require the construction of sidewalks and trails wherever feasible so as to encourage pedestrian and bicycle connectivity throughout the city. Therefore, developments shall provide sidewalks and trails which adjoin the applicant's property: a.In locations shown on the city's sidewalk and trail plan; and b.In other locations where the council finds that the provision of such sidewalks and trails enhance public access to mass transit facilities or connections to other existing or planned sidewalks, trails or public facilities. (2)Developments shall provide sidewalks between building entrances and sidewalks or trails which exist or which will be constructed pursuant to this section. (3)Developments shall provide direct sidewalk and trail connections with adjoining properties where appropriate. (4)Developments must provide direct sidewalk and trail connections to transit stations or transit stops adjoining the property. (5)Design standards for sidewalks and trails shall be prescribed by the engineer. (6)Nonresidential developments having an off-street automobile parking requirement of 20 or more spaces must provide off-street bicycle parking spaces where bicycles may be parked and secured from theft by their owners. The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the automobile parking space requirement. The design and placement of bicycle parking spaces and bicycle racks used to secure bicycles shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. Whenever possible, bicycle parking spaces shall be located within 50 feet of a public entrance to a principal building. (b)The expense of the improvements set forth in subsection (a) of this section shall be borne by the applicant. The applicant would be installing boulevard sidewalks along 70th and France. Additionally, the interior drive would have wide sidewalks on both sides with access ground level access to each use. Most importantly, these interior sidewalks provide for future connections to the properties to the east and the south. As mentioned earlier, the pedestrian environment would be improved compared to the approved plan with no street access to the parking ramps on Ewing, therefore there would be no car/pedestrian conflict on the sidewalks. The City’s transportation planner has reviewed the proposed project and provided a memo to address issues. (See attached memo dated October 8, 2021.) Approval of this project would be conditioned upon meeting the recommendations within the memo. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Per Section 36-253 the following are the regulations for a PUD: STAFF REPORT Page 6 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. 2. Applicability/Criteria a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in this Chapter shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following: i. where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; STAFF REPORT Page 7 ii. any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; iii. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and iv. the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above. The previously approved plans were found to meet the above standards, and therefore, the site was rezoned to PUD. While the plans have been downgraded to make for a more economically feasible project, staff believes the proposal would still meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for “Community Activity Center – CAC,” which allows for retail and multi-family housing in a density range of 90-150 units per acre. The proposal still is a mixed- use development including office, retail, and multi-family residential within the required density range. The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property than existing. The buildings would be pulled up close to the street, with sidewalks in front, and separated from the street by green space to promote a more walkable environment. Store fronts open toward France Avenue and the interior drive. The proposal also provides future pedestrian and vehicle access to properties to the east and south. The proposed new buildings have a more predominant entrance along the street and at the corner of 70th and France. Parking would be enclosed and underground within the buildings, eliminating the surface parking that exists today. The applicant has worked with the City’s sustainability coordinator and has submitted the sustainability questionnaire. (See attached.) The sustainability coordinator has reviewed the proposal and submitted comments within the engineering memo. (See attached.) Comprehensive Plan The proposed uses are all consistent with the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. As mentioned, the site is designated as CAC, Community Activity Center. The description of Land Uses within the Comprehensive Plan is as follows: Contains larger scale uses, height and coverage. Primary uses: Retail, office, lodging, entertainment and residential uses, combined or in separate buildings. Secondary uses: Institutional and recreational. Mixed-use should be encouraged and may be required on larger sites. STAFF REPORT Page 8 The proposed development fits this description. The proposed plan also meets the development character guidelines as outlined in the 2040 Plan as follows: Pedestrian and streetscape amenities. Encourage or require structured parking. Buildings may “step down" in height from intersections. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale. Buildings may “step down" at boundaries with lower-density districts and upper stories “step back" from street. More stringent design standards for larger buildings. Emphasize pedestrian circulation; re- introduce finer- grained circulation patterns where feasible. Compliance Table City Standard (PUD) Proposed Building Setbacks Front – France Avenue Front – 70th Street Side – East Side – South 50 feet – Lot 1 (measured to curb) 18-28 feet (measured to curb) 35 feet 10 feet 50 feet (measured to curb) 18-28 feet (measured to curb) 35 feet 10 feet Building Height 1, 9, 10 & 24 stories 1, 7, 8 and 24 stories Density 90-150 units per acre (5.7 acres) 47 units per acre Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 2.1% 2.1% Parking Retail/Office = 780 spaces Residential = 267 enclosed spaces (1,048 stalls required) (23 for the bank – phase 1) 1,170 spaces total required (Based on previously approved project) 1,112 spaces total* (23 for the bank – phase 1) * As part of the Ordinance Amendment for the project, the parking regulations will be updated STAFF REPORT Page 9 PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues Are the proposed changes to the approved Overall Development Plan reasonable to justify amending the PUD rezoning for this site? Yes. Staff does support the revised PUD, for the following reasons: 1.While the plans are more flawed that the previously approved plans, they still do generally address the Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines. Highlights continue to include: The division of the property into smaller blocks and the provision of pedestrian and vehicle access and connections through the site to adjacent properties to the east and south; increasing the public realm on the site with small park space and sidewalks on the perimeter and through the site; having no surface parking stalls visible from 70th or France Avenue. Conditions can be placed on the request to better align with the Guidelines, such as building and building material enhancements and closer adherence to the Street Typology on 70th Street. 2.The revised plans reduce height on the corner of 70th and France and reduced the residential density from 370 to 267 units. 3.The provision of public space still makes up 26% of the site. This includes 1.2 acres consisting of the internal sidewalks and drive aisles, a 7,00 square foot public/park space south of the residential tower available to the public. 4.The pedestrian experience along Ewing would be improved compared to the approved plan with the elimination of the parking garage entrances on both sides of the street. There would be no car/pedestrian conflict along these sidewalks. 5.The proposal still meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for “Community Activity Center – CAC,” which allows for retail and multi-family housing in a density range of 90-150 units per acre. The applicant is proposing to use the site as a mixed-use development including office, retail, and multi-family residential within the required density range. Project would meet the City’s affordable housing policy, by either including the units in the residential buildings (27 units), or the buy in amount at $125,000 per affordable unit required. The project creates a more efficient and creative use of the property than existing. The buildings would be pulled up close to the street, with sidewalks in front, and separated from the street by green space to promote a more walkable environment. Store fronts open toward France Avenue and portions of the interior drives. Most important, the proposal continues to provide future pedestrian and vehicle access to properties to the east and south. The proposed new buildings have a more predominant entrance along the street and at the corner of 70th and France. Parking would be enclosed and within the buildings, eliminating the surface parking that exists today. STAFF REPORT Page 10 6. As highlighted in the previous request, the location of this site in the CAC, Community Activity Center in between France and York. This is the area of Edina that has been recognized in the Greater Southdale Area Plan and the 2040 Comprehensive Plan as appropriate for higher densities and height. 7. The project would generate 40% fewer daily trips, therefore would have less impact on traffic operation than originally anticipated in the 2020 traffic study done by Spack Consulting. Recommendation A case can be made for approval and denial of this project. Below provides options for the planning commission and city council to consider: Denial Recommend the City Council deny the request for Zoning Ordinance Amendment and new Overall Development Plan for PUD-17. Denial is based on the following findings: 1. Does not adequately address the Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines like the originally approved plan did. The streetscape is less active due to more street level parking within the structures, including a parking ramp that does not contain any liner building, building materials don’t meet city code at street level and there is far less building articulation. The street typology on 70th Street has not been followed. 2. The project no longer includes affordable or workforce housing within the development. 3. The proposed project would not meet the criteria for Rezoning to PUD. Approval Recommend the City Council approve the request for Zoning Ordinance Amendment and new Overall Development Plan for PUD-17. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses, and density are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposal still meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The PUD zoning would: a. Promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City. STAFF REPORT Page 11 c. Provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses. d. Project is of high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned. e. Maintains the efficiency of public streets and utilities. f. Provides a mixture of land uses within the development. g. Project would meet the City’s affordable housing policy. 3. The PUD would ensure that the development proposed would be the only building that would be allowed on the site unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 4. The pedestrian experience along Ewing would be improved compared to the approved plan with the elimination of the parking garage entrances on both sides of the street. There would be no car/pedestrian conflict along these sidewalks. 5. Addresses the Greater Southdale Area Design Experience Guidelines. The following principles are included:  The division of the property into smaller blocks and the provision of pedestrian and vehicle access and connections through the site to adjacent properties to the east and south.  Close conformity to the street typologies  No visible surface parking stalls from 70th or France Avenue.  The provision of public space that makes up 26% of the site. This includes 1.2 acres consisting of the internal sidewalks and drive aisles, a 7,500 square foot public/park space east of the retail/office stie. 6. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern present in much of the city will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. i. Provide visual screening and privacy to buffer cars from people, provide visual relief and allow stormwater infiltration in parking lots. ii. Evaluate current parking standards in order to encourage shared parking and minimize the visual impact of surface parking. iii. Landscaping is essential to screen parking areas, buffer adjacent residential uses and create a pedestrian-friendly environment along streets. iv. Encourage the development of parking lots or structures so they can be shared by more than one building on the site or by buildings on neighboring sites, and which can transition over time to other uses if parking needs change. STAFF REPORT Page 12 b. Encourage successful mixed-use development. c. Ensure that public realm design respects community character, supports of commercial and mixed-use development, promotes community identity, and creates high quality experiences for pedestrians, cyclists, transit users, and motorists. 7. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. Wenck Consulting conducted a traffic and parking impact study and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. The project would generate 40% fewer daily trips, therefore would have less impact on traffic operation than originally anticipated in the 2020 traffic study done by Spack Consulting. 8. The proposed uses would be an upgrade to development on the site. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated September 22, 2021. 2. All buildings must comply with City Code Section 36-618 (11) regarding building materials and transparency. 3. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 4. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. 5. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 6. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 7. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 8. A Developer’s Agreement/Site Improvement Plan Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 9. County approval if necessary, on access to France Avenue. 10. The project must conform to the City’s affordable housing policy. Final determination to be made at final approval. STAFF REPORT Page 13 11.Compliance with the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated October 7, 2021. 12.Compliance with the Spack Consulting Traffic & Parking Study recommendations and the updated Wenck Traffic and Parking Study. 13.Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment revising the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 14.Dedication of public access easements of the east-west and north-south sidewalks and drive- aisles through the site and sidewalks around the perimeter of the site including an easement over the future extension of the north-south internal street and sidewalk on the Bank site. 15.Provision of green roofs as shown on the building renderings. 16.Compliance with the conditions outlined in the fire marshal and building official’s memo dated October 7, 2021. 17.Submittal of a construction management plan subject to review and approval of city staff prior to issuance of a building permit. The plan must demonstrate minimal impact to pedestrian and vehicle movement. 18.Hours of construction must be consistent with City Code. 19.Park dedication shall be paid at the time of approval of a building permit for the residential uses. Dedication shall be $5,000 per unit. The value of the 7,500 square foot park/public space shall be considered for a reduction in the total amount. 20.The property owner shall be responsible for the maintenance of internal sidewalks and drive aisles. The City would snow plow a 5-foot path of the sidewalk on 70th and France. The property owners would be responsible for the remaining areas. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the request subject to the findings and conditions listed above. Deadline for a City decision: January 15, 2022 DATE: 10/7/2021 TO: 7001 France Ave S, Owner and Development Team CC: Cary Teague – Community Development Director FROM: Chad Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Zuleyka Marquez, PE, Graduate Engineer Grace Hancock, Sustainability Coordinator Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner RE: 7001 France Avenue – Development Review, Revised The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for pedestrian facilities, utility connections, grading, flood risk, and storm water. Plans reviewed included civil, landscape, stormwater plans, and survey dated 9/13/21. Review Comment Required For General 1. Existing easements held by the City require Council action to vacate if deemed appropriate and necessary for the project. Consideration of requests can require up to 60-days to process. General Comment 2. Deliver as-build records of public and private utility infrastructure post construction. Certificate of Occupancy 3. Maintenance of sidewalks and streets internal to the site to be responsibility of property owner. Maintenance of sidewalks on France Ave and 70th Street will be by the City. City snowplowing operations are 5-ft wide on these sidewalks. If owner wants a wider path, this would be the responsibility of the owner. Note, the locations of permeable pavers and colored concrete should be noted on the plans and are considered the property owner’s maintenance responsibility. General Comment Survey 4. An existing and proposed site condition survey is required. Grading/Building Permit 4.1 Show all existing and proposed public and private easements. Grading/Building Permit Living Streets 5. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. Grading/Building Permit 6. Saw cut concrete sidewalk joints on public sidewalks. Grading/Building Permit 7. Public sidewalk to be minimum 8-ft wide with an 8-ft boulevard along France Avenue and 5-ft wide minimum with a 5-ft minimum boulevard along 70th Street. Grading/Building Permit 8. Public access easements will be required to allow the public to use the streets and sidewalks internal to the site. Maintenance of all internal streets and sidewalks shall be the responsibility of the owner. This aligns with the Southdale Area Design Guidelines. General Comment 9. The applicant should consider additional pedestrian and bicycle crossings/connections to Brandon Square Mall to the east and Rue de France mall to the south. General Comment Traffic and Street 10. Review fire access requirements with fire department. Fire truck turning template attached. Grading/Building Permit 11. Driveway Entrance permit required for entrance reconstruction. Building Permit 12. Refer to standard plates 410 and 415. Minimum of 24’ in width for two-way drive. 20’ provided for center drive. 15’ radii per standard plates; various radii provided. Building Permit 13. Road and lane closures on France Ave S must be coordinated with Hennepin County. Street repairs must be completed to the County’s standards. General Comment 14. 70th St W was reconstructed in 2007. Road patching on 70th St W shall conform to Edina Standard Plates 540 and 543. Certificate of Occupancy 15. Provide easements or right-of-way along 70th St W to accommodate recommended additional vehicle lane, boulevard and pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Certificate of Occupancy 16. Provide easements for future public streets at two locations. Along the center street south to the southerly property line and along the east property line to the southerly property line. Certificate of Occupancy 17. Consider providing directional signage/information for local transit services or subsidizing transit passes for tenants and employees. General Comment 18. Provide 57 bicycle parking stalls (5% of proposed vehicle parking). Of these, 38 (min.) should be provided in the parking ramp; the remaining 19 (min.) should be provided elsewhere on the site. All bicycle parking stalls should be in convenient, well-lit locations within 50’ of a public entrance to a principal building. Rack style and spacing should follow the recommendations of the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (APBP). Grading/Building Permit 19. Turning movements and travel routes for delivery vehicles should be reviewed. Steps should be taken to minimize the impact of delivery vehicles on pedestrian and bicycle movement through the site (additional signage, designated delivery zones, etc.) General Comment 20. Proposed trees, vegetation, signage and other items adjacent to intersections should maintain a clear view zone as defined in Section 26-190 of City Code. Grading/Building Permit 21. Implement Tier 2 Travel Demand Management strategies (5 minimum). Those proposed by the applicant include; 1. Covered bicycle parking and a bicycle repair station. 2. Internal and perimeter sidewalks with boulevard trees, landscaping and other buffers between motor vehicle traffic. 3. Marked pedestrian crosswalks. Other strategies recommended by staff include; 1. Designate EV charging stations as recommended by staff (see Sustainability below). 2. Designate parking stalls for car sharing service (i.e, HourCar), placed in visible, convenient locations near pedestrian and bicycle facilities. 3. Widen internal sidewalks to 8’ (minimum) to accommodate shared pedestrian and bicycle use or installing bicycle pavement markings on internal streets. 4. Maintain or widening the existing vegetated boulevards to improve user safety and comfort. 5. Provide additional pedestrian and bicycle crossings/connections to Brandon Square Mall to the east and Rue de France mall to the south. 6. Provide directional signage/information for transportation amenities (adjacent transit services, bicycle parking, car sharing, adjacent parks/trails). 7. Subsidize transit passes for tenants and employees. Certificate of Occupancy Sanitary and Water Utilities 22. Verify fire demand and hydrant locations. Attached system flow/pressure curve provided for developer’s design. Grading/Building Permit 23. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 24. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 25. Apply for a sewer and water connection permit with Public Works. Prior to Starting Utility Work 25.1 Meter required for building service line and combined lines. No meter required for fire only service line. Grading/Building Permit 25.2 Public Works to determine acceptable installation methods. Grading/Building Permit 26. Disconnected sanitary and water services to be capped at main. 27. A SAC determination will be required by the Metropolitan Council. The SAC determination will be used by the City to calculate sewer and water connection charges Grading/Building Permit 28. Single connection from main for fire and domestic, split after main connection. Grading/Building Permit 29. No evidence of a well onsite. If any wells are found during construction, wells not in use must be sealed by a licensed well contractor per MN Rules, Chapter 4725. Certificate of Occupancy Storm Water Utility 30. Provide final geotechnical report with soil borings. Draft report was provided date 10/14/2020 as attachment to stormwater report. Grading/Building Permit 31. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report meeting watershed and state construction site permit requirements. Latest report provided dated 10/21/20. Provide revised report for comments. Grading/Building Permit 32. Submit watershed district permit and copies of private maintenance agreement in favor of watershed. Grading/Building Permit 33. Attached to this review is a technical memorandum from Barr Engineering that reviewed the potential for backflow in the existing conditions, and nearby flood elevations to inform design. A. The site existing conditions should assume that the site accepts no backflow from public systems. The attached report provides a summary of additional model detail to inform the review. B. The attached report shows the site accepts overflow from nearby private commercial systems. The applicant can exclude these flows in the existing conditions to the extent that they can reduce them in the proposed conditions. Work with neighboring property on proposed changes and the flood risk associated with these flows. C. Design should account for tailwater. The attached report provides hydraulic grade line in nearby France Avenue system for use. D. Design should account for existing pumped flow configuration. The attached report assumes pumping Grading/Building Permit rates at 1cfs. Further information was requested, but useful information was not provided. We will accept additional evidence of current pump size and flow characteristics if you wish to modify this assumption. 34. Coordinate landscaping plan and stormwater management plan. Trees planned in underground infiltration system vicinity. Grading/Building Permit Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 35. A SWPPP consistent with the State General Construction Site Stormwater Permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Constructability and Safety 36. Construction staging, traffic control, and pedestrian access plans will be required. Be prepared to provide detailed plans for construction phasing and minimization of pedestrian and traffic impacts. Grading/Building Permit 37. Retaining walls over 4-ft in height require design by a structural engineer. Grading/Building Permit 38. Any needed closures of France Avenue shall be coordinated with Hennepin County. General Comment 39. 70th Street shall not be used for construction staging. Any short- term closures shall be approved by the City Engineer. General Comment 40. Construction staging or construction fencing shall not impede the City’s ability to snowplow the adjacent streets. If construction fencing removes storage space for snow, developer shall be responsible for snow removal in the street adjacent to any impacts to City operations. General Comment 41. Developer shall consider pre-condition surveys of 70th Street and France Avenue to aid in determine post-construction impacts caused by the project. Impacts caused by the project shall be the responsibility of the contractor to correct. General Comment Other Agency Coordination 42. MDH, MPCA and MCES permits required as needed. Grading/Building Permit 43. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Sustainability 44. The Metropolitan Council's Extreme Heat map shows that during an extreme heat event (when air temperatures are 90 or above), this area of Edina can be up to 35 degrees F hotter than General Comment surrounding areas. Green roofs, mature tree canopy and climate- adapted plantings reduce the urban heat island effect, and reduce amount of greenhouse gas emissions trapped in the atmosphere and energy needs to cool a building. 45. The University of Minnesota's Solar Suitability map rates this property as "good" for solar roof installations with a grade of 83 out of 100. Rooftop solar generates emission-free energy. Staff affirms effort to add solar-ready capacity to roof. General Comment 46. Staff recommends installing EV chargers for a minimum of 5% of proposed parking (27 stalls) in addition to wiring 10% (540 stalls) for EV conversion in the future. General Comment 47. Staff acknowledges and appreciates that this development proposal seeks to engage most pathways toward sustainable building design, with the completion of items marked “yes” items from Sustainable Design Questionnaire as described below: - utilize Xcel Energy’s Energy Design Assistance and/or Centerpoint Energy’s Builder and Developer programs for this development - appliances and equipment be Energy Star or EPA WaterSense certified - Take action beyond state building and energy code: Utilize LED Lighting, programmable thermostats, VRF HVAC systems, lighting controls in common spaces, building automation system - Green roof areas included on new office tower and residential tower - Building operations subscribe to renewable energy - Demolition of existing structures will meet LEED Green Building Demolition and/or B3 State of Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines - Scrap and excess construction materials will be separated and recycled - Workers will be provided with separate recycling dumpsters and training in proper use - Plant trees for increased tree canopy coverage - Provide shade trees, native, climate-adapted and pollinator-friendly landscaping - Provide recycling and organics recycling for building users once building starts operating - outdoor landscaping watering system include a water sensor to automatically reduce watering in wet conditions General Comment Barr Engineering Co. 4300 MarketPointe Drive, Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55435 952.832.2600 www.barr.com Technical Memorandum To: Ross Bintner– City of Edina (City) From: Michael McKinney, PE – Barr Engineering Co. (Barr) Subject: 7001 France Ave existing condition XPSWMM model review Date: October 28, 2020 Project: 23270354.00 Stormwater Management General Engineering The following technical memorandum summarizes hydrologic and hydraulic evaluation of the 7001 France Ave property and connections to City of Edina (City) storm sewer infrastructure. The memorandum summarizes existing flood inundation and flood storage volume within the 7001 France Ave site and summarizes tailwater conditions in the receiving City storm sewer trunk line along France Ave. 1.0 Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling: XPSWMM Model Updates The City’s Nine Mile Creek XPSWMM model was updated and used to evaluate existing hydrologic and hydraulic condition on the 7001 France Ave site. Model updates were incorporated using methodology and source data outlined in the 2018 Edina CWRMP (Edina, 2018). The following subsections describe updates made to the existing conditions XPSWMM model, including all relevant modeling assumptions. 1.1 Updated 7001 France Ave storm sewer modeling per ALTA survey ALTA survey information was provided for the 7001 France Ave site on October 14, 2020 (D. Bade, personal communication, October 14, 2020). Storm sewer survey data included in the ALTA survey was reviewed and incorporated into existing condition modeling (Figure 1). Updated storm sewer inlet locations included in the ALTA survey were incorporated and subwatershed divides were updated accordingly (see Section 1.2). The 7001 France Ave storm sewer lift station was not included within the ALTA survey (see discussion of assumptions and data gaps in Section 1.3) 1.2 Update subwatershed divides in vicinity of 7001 France Ave Subwatersheds within and adjacent to the 7001 France Ave site were updated to: • Capture drainage to storm sewer inlets included in the ALTA survey, and • Capture potential for bypass from inlets along W 70th St to the 7001 France Ave site. Updated subwatershed divides are shown on Figure 1. In addition to updates within the 7001 France Ave site and along W 70th St, the subwatershed divide for the neighboring 3501 W 70th St parking lot (Brandon Square Mall) was updated to more-accurately capture runoff to, and storage within, the parking lot. Stage-area-storage curves and hydrologic parameters were generated for all new and updated subwatershed divides. To: Ross Bintner– City of Edina (City) From: Michael McKinney, PE – Barr Engineering Co. (Barr) Subject: 7001 France Ave existing condition XPSWMM model review Date: October 28, 2020 Page: 2 \\barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2020\SW\Potential 2020 updates\7001 France Ave\02 Tech Memo\7001 France Ave Existing Conditions Review 20201029.docx Figure 1 7001 France Ave: storm sewer and subwatershed divides 1.3 Remaining assumptions and data gaps Missing or incomplete data from the ALTA survey and City storm sewer data are outlined, below: • 7001 France Ave lift station information, • Storm sewer connection from Brandon Square Mall parking lot to W 70th St trunk line, and • Minor storm sewer data gaps (e.g., missing upstream invert, missing pipe diameter). Scanned record drawings for the 7001 France Ave US Bank property were provided (P. Ellis and D. J. Arndt, personal communication, October 27, 2020), but did not contain information for the site lift station (e.g., lift station record drawing, operation elevations, pump model, pump curve, etc.). An assumed lift station was modeled with a maximum capacity of 1 cfs (~450 gpm). Lift Station To: Ross Bintner– City of Edina (City) From: Michael McKinney, PE – Barr Engineering Co. (Barr) Subject: 7001 France Ave existing condition XPSWMM model review Date: October 28, 2020 Page: 3 \\barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2020\SW\Potential 2020 updates\7001 France Ave\02 Tech Memo\7001 France Ave Existing Conditions Review 20201029.docx City survey information indicates there is a 12-inch pipe connection from the Brandon Square Parking lot to the W 70th St trunk line (R. Bintner, personal communication, October 13, 2020). Private storm sewer infrastructure information for the Brandon Square Mall is not available. Storm sewer invert elevations and roof drainage connections from the Brandon Square Mall site were assumed. Other minor storm sewer data gaps (e.g., missing upstream invert, missing pipe size, etc.) were filled based on review of connected storm sewer infrastructure. All assumptions are tracked within the model link and node GIS feature classes. 2.0 XPSWMM Model Results The City requested that Barr update the City Nine Mile Creek XPSWMM model in the vicinity of the 7001 France Ave site to evaluate the following: 1) Evaluate the maximum stored stormwater runoff volume and flood inundation extent on the 7001 France Ave site for the Atlas 14 10-year, 24-hour event (10-year event) and the Atlas 14 100-year, 24-hour (100-year event). 2) Evaluate the hydraulic grade line along France Ave for the 10-year and 100-year events. 3) Evaluate the stage tailwater hydrograph at the connection point from the 7001 France Ave site to the France Ave storm sewer trunk line for the 10-year and 100-year events. 4) Evaluate backflow from the France Ave storm sewer trunk line to the 7001 France Ave site. If present, review items 1 through 3 above with backflow prevention in place. Questions originally posed by the City are answered in order in the following subsections. 2.1 Evaluate the maximum stored volume and flood inundation extent Maximum stored volume and maximum water surface elevations for subwatersheds within the 7001 France Ave site are summarized in Table 1, and maximum flood inundation extents are shown in Figure 2. Additionally, Figure 2 shows the 10-year and 100-year maximum water surface elevations at structures along France Ave and shows the location of overflow entering the 7001 France Ave site from structures along W 70th St and the Brandon Square Mall parking lot. Overflow volumes from W 70th St and Brandon Square Mall are summarized in Table 2. Results summarized in Table 1, Table 2, and Figure 2 are based on model updates and assumption discussed in Section 1.0. To: Ross Bintner– City of Edina (City) From: Michael McKinney, PE – Barr Engineering Co. (Barr) Subject: 7001 France Ave existing condition XPSWMM model review Date: October 28, 2020 Page: 4 \\barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2020\SW\Potential 2020 updates\7001 France Ave\02 Tech Memo\7001 France Ave Existing Conditions Review 20201029.docx Table 1 Maximum stored volume: 7001 France Ave Subwatershed Maximum Water Surface Elevation (ft) Maximum Stored Volume (cf) Atlas 14, 10-year event Atlas 14, 100-year event Atlas 14, 10-year event Atlas 14, 100-year event CL_51a 859.5 861.5 23,040 66,170 CL_51b 865.2 865.6 62 67 CL_51c 866.1 866.3 136 247 CL_51d 865.3 865.6 66 69 CL_51e 862.9 863.1 3,129 3,676 CL_51 863.0 863.1 63 192 Total (cf) 26,495 70,421 Table 2 Overflow volume summary to 7001 France Ave site Total Overflow Volume (cf) Overflow Description (1) Atlas 14, 10-year event Atlas 14, 100-year event Primary OF from Brandon Square Mall [Overflows at elev. 870.5 feet] 8,687 27,176 Overflow from CBs on W 70th St [Overflows at elev. 870.8 feet] 0 285 Total to 7001 France Ave Lift Station 8,687 27,461 Secondary OF from Brandon Square Mall [Overflows at elev. 870.7 feet] 55 6,340 (1) Overflow locations shown on Figure 2. To: Ross Bintner– City of Edina (City) From: Michael McKinney, PE – Barr Engineering Co. (Barr) Subject: 7001 France Ave existing condition XPSWMM model review Date: October 28, 2020 Page: 5 \\barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2020\SW\Potential 2020 updates\7001 France Ave\02 Tech Memo\7001 France Ave Existing Conditions Review 20201029.docx Figure 2 Flood inundation extents and maximum water surface elevations along France Ave: 10-year and 100-year events 2.2 Evaluate the hydraulic grade line along France Ave The 10-year event and 100-year event hydraulic grade lines along the France Ave storm sewer trunk line from W 70th St south to Hazelton Road are shown in figures included in Appendix A. The storm sewer connection from 7001 France Ave is shown on these figures to highlight tailwater boundary conditions in the receiving portion of the France Ave trunk line for both events. The 10-year and 100-year maximum water surface elevations at structures along France Ave are additionally shown in Figure 2. Key elevations within the 7001 France Ave site are summarized, below: Overflow from W 70th St CBs Brandon Square Mall: Primary Overflow Brandon Square Mall: Secondary Overflow Lift Station To: Ross Bintner– City of Edina (City) From: Michael McKinney, PE – Barr Engineering Co. (Barr) Subject: 7001 France Ave existing condition XPSWMM model review Date: October 28, 2020 Page: 6 \\barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2020\SW\Potential 2020 updates\7001 France Ave\02 Tech Memo\7001 France Ave Existing Conditions Review 20201029.docx • Upstream invert of 7001 France Ave storm sewer connection to France Ave: 856.3 ft • Overflow elevation from 7001 France Ave Entrance to France Ave: 862.9 ft • Low elevation in CL_51a (bank teller location): 856.9 ft 2.3 Evaluate the tailwater stage hydrograph at France Ave trunk line connection The stage hydrograph for the 10-year and 100-year events at the connection point from the 7001 France Ave property to the France Ave storm sewer trunk line is shown in Figure 3. Tailwater conditions in the receiving portion of the France Ave storm sewer trunkline restrict outflow from the 7001 France Ave during the modeled 10-year and 100-year events. It is critical to consider the tailwater boundary condition of the receiving portion of the France Ave storm sewer trunk line when evaluating the connection from the 7001 France Ave site. For this reason, tabular versions of the 10-year and 100-year stage hydrographs are included in Appendix A. Figure 3 Stage hydrograph at the 7001 France Ave / France Ave trunk line connection for the 10-year and 100-year events 2.4 Evaluate backflow from the France Ave storm sewer connection Based on the updated existing conditions XPSWMM model, there is no backflow from the France Ave storm sewer connection to the 7001 France Ave site during the 10-year or 100-year events. For this reason, no additional evaluation of backflow prevention was performed. Maximum Stage: 10-year: 862.1 100-year: 862.3 To: Ross Bintner– City of Edina (City) From: Michael McKinney, PE – Barr Engineering Co. (Barr) Subject: 7001 France Ave existing condition XPSWMM model review Date: October 28, 2020 Page: 7 \\barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2020\SW\Potential 2020 updates\7001 France Ave\02 Tech Memo\7001 France Ave Existing Conditions Review 20201029.docx 3.0 Conclusions and Recommendations Existing hydrologic and hydraulic conditions at the 7001 France Ave site were evaluated using the City’s Nine Mile Creek XPSWMM model. The existing conditions XPSWMM model was updated based on received ALTA survey data and best available City storm sewer data. The updated exiting conditions XPSWMM model was used to evaluate the following: • Maximum flood inundation extent and maximum stored runoff volume on the 7001 France Ave site for the 10-year and 100-year events. • The hydraulic grade line along the receiving France Ave storm sewer trunk line for the 10-year and 100-year events. • The tailwater stage hydrograph at the connection point from 7001 France Ave to the France Ave storm sewer for the 10-year and 100-year events. • Backflow from the France Ave trunk line to the 7001 France Ave site to ensure there is no backflow during the 10-year or 100-year events. Barr recommends that information provided in this technical memorandum be reviewed and incorporated into design and evaluation of proposed conditions and/or redevelopment of the 7001 France Ave site. Specifically, the following storm water management recommendations should be considered: • Maximum existing condition stored runoff volumes on the 7001 France Ave site (Table 1) should be considered when evaluating grading and stormwater management. If available storage on site is significantly reduced, proposed conditions could result in increased flood risk to neighboring properties and/or increased discharge rate to receiving City storm sewer infrastructure. • The tailwater stage hydrograph at the connection point from 7001 France Ave to the France Ave storm sewer trunkline (Figure 3 and Appendix A) should be incorporated into evaluation of proposed connections from the 7001 France Ave site (i.e., free discharge to the France Ave trunk line should not be assumed). • The potential for backflow from the France Ave storm sewer trunk line should be considered when evaluating proposed connections to the France Ave trunk line. Based on existing conditions, there is no backflow from the France Ave trunk line to the 7001 France Ave site for the 10-year or 100-year design events. Any future or proposed conditions should maintain this result. • Data gaps and assumption outlined in Section 1.3 should be considered. Specifically, it is recommended that existing condition modeling of the 7001 France Ave lift station and private connections from the Brandon Square Mall be reviewed and updated if data becomes available. To: Ross Bintner– City of Edina (City) From: Michael McKinney, PE – Barr Engineering Co. (Barr) Subject: 7001 France Ave existing condition XPSWMM model review Date: October 28, 2020 Page: 8 \\barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2020\SW\Potential 2020 updates\7001 France Ave\02 Tech Memo\7001 France Ave Existing Conditions Review 20201029.docx References Barr Engineering Co. (Barr). 2018. 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan. Prepared for the City of Edina. D. Bade, personal correspondence, October 14, 2020. Email correspondence and delivery of ALTA survey for the 7001 France Ave site. P. Ellis and D. J. Arndt, personal communication, October 27, 2020. Email correspondence and delivery of scanned record drawings for the existing 7001 France Ave US Bank site. R. Bintner, personal communication, October 13, 2020. Phone correspondence related to connection from Brandon Square Mall to W 70th St storm sewer trunkline. Appendix A France Ave hydraulic grade line and stage hydrograph at 7001 France Ave connection \\barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2020\SW\Potential 2020 updates\7001 France Ave\02 Tech Memo\7001 France Ave Existing Conditions Review 20201029.docx Figure A1 France Ave storm sewer hydraulic grade line: 10-year design event \\barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2020\SW\Potential 2020 updates\7001 France Ave\02 Tech Memo\7001 France Ave Existing Conditions Review 20201029.docx Figure A2 France Ave storm sewer hydraulic grade line: 100-year design event \\barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2020\SW\Potential 2020 updates\7001 France Ave\02 Tech Memo\7001 France Ave Existing Conditions Review 20201029.docx Table A1 Stage hydrograph at 7001 France Ave / France Ave trunk line connection structure Time (hr) Stage Hydrograph (NGVD29, ft) A14 10-year A14 100-year 0 854.2 854.2 0.1 854.2 854.2 0.2 854.2 854.2 0.3 854.2 854.2 0.4 854.2 854.2 0.5 854.2 854.2 0.6 854.2 854.2 0.7 854.2 854.2 0.8 854.2 854.2 0.9 854.2 854.2 1 854.2 854.2 1.1 854.2 854.2 1.2 854.2 854.2 1.3 854.2 854.2 1.4 854.2 854.2 1.5 854.2 854.2 1.6 854.2 854.2 1.7 854.2 854.2 1.8 854.2 854.2 1.9 854.2 854.2 2 854.2 854.2 2.1 854.2 854.2 2.2 854.2 854.221 2.3 854.2 854.228 2.4 854.2 854.233 2.5 854.2 854.257 2.6 854.2 854.278 2.7 854.2 854.294 2.8 854.2 854.311 2.9 854.2 854.328 3 854.2 854.34 3.1 854.2 854.348 3.2 854.2 854.354 3.3 854.2 854.36 3.4 854.2 854.364 3.5 854.2 854.368 3.6 854.2 854.371 3.7 854.2 854.374 3.8 854.2 854.377 3.9 854.2 854.379 4 854.2 854.381 4.1 854.2 854.383 4.2 854.2 854.385 4.3 854.2 854.386 4.4 854.221 854.388 4.5 854.225 854.389 4.6 854.219 854.39 \\barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2020\SW\Potential 2020 updates\7001 France Ave\02 Tech Memo\7001 France Ave Existing Conditions Review 20201029.docx Time (hr) Stage Hydrograph (NGVD29, ft) A14 10-year A14 100-year 4.7 854.225 854.391 4.8 854.238 854.392 4.9 854.252 854.392 5 854.262 854.393 5.1 854.271 854.394 5.2 854.28 854.394 5.3 854.289 854.395 5.4 854.296 854.395 5.5 854.302 854.395 5.6 854.307 854.396 5.7 854.311 854.396 5.8 854.315 854.396 5.9 854.318 854.396 6 854.327 854.411 6.1 854.348 854.441 6.2 854.367 854.465 6.3 854.383 854.482 6.4 854.396 854.495 6.5 854.405 854.504 6.6 854.413 854.512 6.7 854.42 854.518 6.8 854.425 854.522 6.9 854.43 854.525 7 854.433 854.528 7.1 854.436 854.531 7.2 854.439 854.533 7.3 854.442 854.535 7.4 854.444 854.536 7.5 854.445 854.537 7.6 854.447 854.538 7.7 854.448 854.539 7.8 854.449 854.54 7.9 854.45 854.54 8 854.451 854.541 8.1 854.452 854.541 8.2 854.452 854.541 8.3 854.453 854.542 8.4 854.453 854.542 8.5 854.454 854.542 8.6 854.454 854.542 8.7 854.454 854.542 8.8 854.455 854.542 8.9 854.455 854.542 9 854.499 854.624 9.1 854.57 854.731 9.2 854.617 854.793 9.3 854.648 854.832 9.4 854.67 854.858 \\barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2020\SW\Potential 2020 updates\7001 France Ave\02 Tech Memo\7001 France Ave Existing Conditions Review 20201029.docx Time (hr) Stage Hydrograph (NGVD29, ft) A14 10-year A14 100-year 9.5 854.685 854.875 9.6 854.695 854.887 9.7 854.703 854.895 9.8 854.71 854.902 9.9 854.714 854.906 10 854.718 854.909 10.1 854.721 854.911 10.2 854.723 854.913 10.3 854.725 854.914 10.4 854.726 854.915 10.5 854.801 855.041 10.6 854.886 855.154 10.7 854.93 855.214 10.8 854.959 855.25 10.9 854.977 855.272 11 855.043 855.376 11.1 855.098 855.467 11.2 855.129 855.514 11.3 855.148 855.558 11.4 855.16 855.624 11.5 855.343 856.587 11.6 855.511 858.649 11.7 855.684 860.176 11.8 856.284 861.154 11.9 861.201 862.08 12 862.085 862.273 12.1 862.058 862.284 12.2 861.268 862.295 12.3 860.167 862.262 12.4 859.625 862.228 12.5 857.706 862.188 12.6 855.617 862.121 12.7 855.53 862.045 12.8 855.483 860.985 12.9 855.451 859.948 13 855.215 859.309 13.1 855.142 858.141 13.2 855.104 857.789 13.3 855.081 857.514 13.4 855.066 855.732 13.5 854.987 855.259 13.6 854.912 855.128 13.7 854.87 855.059 13.8 854.843 855.017 13.9 854.825 854.99 14 854.812 854.972 14.1 854.803 854.96 14.2 854.796 854.952 \\barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2020\SW\Potential 2020 updates\7001 France Ave\02 Tech Memo\7001 France Ave Existing Conditions Review 20201029.docx Time (hr) Stage Hydrograph (NGVD29, ft) A14 10-year A14 100-year 14.3 854.791 854.946 14.4 854.787 854.942 14.5 854.784 854.939 14.6 854.782 854.937 14.7 854.781 854.936 14.8 854.779 854.935 14.9 854.778 854.934 15 854.745 854.87 15.1 854.701 854.8 15.2 854.672 854.755 15.3 854.651 854.724 15.4 854.635 854.702 15.5 854.623 854.686 15.6 854.614 854.674 15.7 854.606 854.664 15.8 854.601 854.657 15.9 854.596 854.651 16 854.592 854.646 16.1 854.589 854.642 16.2 854.586 854.639 16.3 854.584 854.637 16.4 854.582 854.635 16.5 854.58 854.633 16.6 854.579 854.632 16.7 854.578 854.631 16.8 854.577 854.63 16.9 854.576 854.63 17 854.575 854.629 17.1 854.575 854.629 17.2 854.574 854.628 17.3 854.574 854.628 17.4 854.573 854.628 17.5 854.573 854.627 17.6 854.573 854.627 17.7 854.573 854.627 17.8 854.573 854.627 17.9 854.573 854.627 18 854.568 854.617 18.1 854.559 854.601 18.2 854.552 854.588 18.3 854.546 854.579 18.4 854.541 854.572 18.5 854.537 854.566 18.6 854.534 854.561 18.7 854.532 854.557 18.8 854.529 854.554 18.9 854.528 854.551 19 854.526 854.548 \\barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2020\SW\Potential 2020 updates\7001 France Ave\02 Tech Memo\7001 France Ave Existing Conditions Review 20201029.docx Time (hr) Stage Hydrograph (NGVD29, ft) A14 10-year A14 100-year 19.1 854.524 854.547 19.2 854.523 854.545 19.3 854.522 854.544 19.4 854.522 854.542 19.5 854.521 854.541 19.6 854.52 854.54 19.7 854.52 854.54 19.8 854.519 854.539 19.9 854.519 854.538 20 854.518 854.538 20.1 854.518 854.537 20.2 854.518 854.537 20.3 854.518 854.537 20.4 854.517 854.536 20.5 854.517 854.536 20.6 854.517 854.536 20.7 854.517 854.536 20.8 854.517 854.536 20.9 854.517 854.536 21 854.517 854.535 21.1 854.517 854.535 21.2 854.517 854.535 21.3 854.348 854.535 21.4 854.346 854.535 21.5 854.346 854.535 21.6 854.346 854.535 21.7 854.346 854.535 21.8 854.345 854.535 21.9 854.345 854.535 22 854.345 854.535 22.1 854.345 854.535 22.2 854.345 854.535 22.3 854.345 854.535 22.4 854.345 854.535 22.5 854.345 854.535 22.6 854.344 854.535 22.7 854.344 854.535 22.8 854.344 854.535 22.9 854.344 854.535 23 854.344 854.535 23.1 854.344 854.535 23.2 854.344 854.535 23.3 854.344 854.535 23.4 854.344 854.535 23.5 854.344 854.535 23.6 854.344 854.535 23.7 854.344 854.535 23.8 854.344 854.535 \\barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2020\SW\Potential 2020 updates\7001 France Ave\02 Tech Memo\7001 France Ave Existing Conditions Review 20201029.docx Time (hr) Stage Hydrograph (NGVD29, ft) A14 10-year A14 100-year 23.9 854.344 854.535 24 854.34 854.532 24.1 854.332 854.525 24.2 854.323 854.519 24.3 854.314 854.513 24.4 854.304 854.509 24.5 854.298 854.506 24.6 854.292 854.503 24.7 854.287 854.5 24.8 854.281 854.498 24.9 854.277 854.496 25 854.273 854.495 25.1 854.269 854.494 25.2 854.264 854.492 25.3 854.26 854.491 25.4 854.255 854.49 25.5 854.252 854.49 25.6 854.248 854.489 25.7 854.245 854.488 25.8 854.242 854.487 25.9 854.239 854.487 26 854.236 854.487 26.1 854.233 854.486 26.2 854.231 854.486 26.3 854.228 854.485 26.4 854.226 854.485 26.5 854.224 854.485 26.6 854.222 854.485 26.7 854.22 854.484 26.8 854.218 854.484 26.9 854.216 854.484 27 854.215 854.484 27.1 854.213 854.484 27.2 854.212 854.484 27.3 854.21 854.484 27.4 854.209 854.484 27.5 854.208 854.483 27.6 854.207 854.483 27.7 854.206 854.483 27.8 854.206 854.483 27.9 854.205 854.483 28 854.205 854.483 28.1 854.204 854.483 28.2 854.204 854.483 28.3 854.204 854.483 28.4 854.203 854.483 28.5 854.203 854.483 28.6 854.203 854.483 \\barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2020\SW\Potential 2020 updates\7001 France Ave\02 Tech Memo\7001 France Ave Existing Conditions Review 20201029.docx Time (hr) Stage Hydrograph (NGVD29, ft) A14 10-year A14 100-year 28.7 854.203 854.483 28.8 854.202 854.483 28.9 854.202 854.484 29 854.202 854.484 29.1 854.202 854.484 29.2 854.202 854.484 29.3 854.202 854.484 29.4 854.202 854.484 29.5 854.201 854.484 29.6 854.201 854.484 29.7 854.201 854.484 29.8 854.201 854.484 29.9 854.201 854.484 30 854.201 854.484 30.1 854.201 854.484 30.2 854.201 854.484 30.3 854.201 854.484 30.4 854.201 854.484 30.5 854.201 854.484 30.6 854.201 854.484 30.7 854.201 854.484 30.8 854.201 854.484 30.9 854.201 854.484 31 854.201 854.484 31.1 854.2 854.484 31.2 854.2 854.484 31.3 854.2 854.485 31.4 854.2 854.485 31.5 854.2 854.485 31.6 854.2 854.485 31.7 854.2 854.485 31.8 854.2 854.485 31.9 854.2 854.485 32 854.2 854.485 32.1 854.2 854.485 32.2 854.2 854.485 32.3 854.2 854.485 32.4 854.2 854.485 32.5 854.2 854.485 32.6 854.2 854.485 32.7 854.2 854.485 32.8 854.2 854.485 32.9 854.2 854.485 33 854.2 854.486 33.1 854.2 854.486 33.2 854.2 854.486 33.3 854.2 854.486 33.4 854.2 854.486 \\barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2020\SW\Potential 2020 updates\7001 France Ave\02 Tech Memo\7001 France Ave Existing Conditions Review 20201029.docx Time (hr) Stage Hydrograph (NGVD29, ft) A14 10-year A14 100-year 33.5 854.2 854.486 33.6 854.2 854.486 33.7 854.2 854.486 33.8 854.2 854.486 33.9 854.2 854.486 34 854.2 854.486 34.1 854.2 854.486 34.2 854.2 854.487 34.3 854.2 854.487 34.4 854.2 854.487 34.5 854.2 854.487 34.6 854.2 854.487 34.7 854.2 854.487 34.8 854.2 854.487 34.9 854.2 854.487 35 854.2 854.488 35.1 854.2 854.488 35.2 854.2 854.331 35.3 854.2 854.23 35.4 854.2 854.214 35.5 854.2 854.208 35.6 854.2 854.205 35.7 854.2 854.203 35.8 854.2 854.202 35.9 854.2 854.202 36 854.2 854.201 36.1 854.2 854.201 36.2 854.2 854.201 36.3 854.2 854.2 36.4 854.2 854.2 36.5 854.2 854.2 36.6 854.2 854.2 36.7 854.2 854.2 36.8 854.2 854.2 36.9 854.2 854.2 37 854.2 854.2 37.1 854.2 854.2 37.2 854.2 854.2 37.3 854.2 854.2 37.4 854.2 854.2 37.5 854.2 854.2 37.6 854.2 854.2 37.7 854.2 854.2 37.8 854.2 854.2 37.9 854.2 854.2 38 854.2 854.2 38.1 854.2 854.2 38.2 854.2 854.2 \\barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2020\SW\Potential 2020 updates\7001 France Ave\02 Tech Memo\7001 France Ave Existing Conditions Review 20201029.docx Time (hr) Stage Hydrograph (NGVD29, ft) A14 10-year A14 100-year 38.3 854.2 854.2 38.4 854.2 854.2 38.5 854.2 854.2 38.6 854.2 854.2 38.7 854.2 854.2 38.8 854.2 854.2 38.9 854.2 854.2 39 854.2 854.2 39.1 854.2 854.2 39.2 854.2 854.2 39.3 854.2 854.2 39.4 854.2 854.2 39.5 854.2 854.2 39.6 854.2 854.2 39.7 854.2 854.2 39.8 854.2 854.2 39.9 854.2 854.2 40 854.2 854.2 Date: November 10, 2020 To: Cary Teague – Community Development Director Chad Millner, PE – Director of Engineering Cc: 7001 France Avenue, Owner and Development Team From: Andrew Scipioni – Transportation Planner Re: 7001 France Avenue – Transportation Review Mortenson and Orion Investments are proposing to redevelop 7001 France Avenue, currently occupied by U.S. Bank. The proposed redevelopment would replace the existing building with four distinct buildings containing 379 residential units, 152,500 square feet of office space, 3,300 square feet of retail space, a 6,500-square-foot bank and a 1,500-square-foot coffee shop without a drive-thru. Spack Solutions completed a traffic impact study (TIS) for this project on behalf of the City. This memo will review the findings of the TIS and other transportation impacts of the proposed development. Trip Generation Spack analyzed trip generation using two methods. One method is based on the trip generation rates for various land uses in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. This manual provides national average traffic generation rates for different land uses. The second method is based on trip generation rates generated from local data collected by Spack. The local data estimates that the proposed development will generate 8,100 total new trips (over 1,300 more than the ITE data). Figure 1 shows the distribution of new trips by land use. Figure 1: Trip Generation by Land Use (Local data supplemented by ITE) 5068 63% 1548 19% 82 1% 124 1%728 9% 550 7% Supermarket Multi-Family Housing Shopping Center Coffee/Donut Shop General Office Drive-In Bank Spack’s analysis shows that almost 5,100 (over 60%) of the total new trips will be generated by the proposed supermarket, with the residential and business uses accounting for 19% and 9% of the total new trips, respectively. Capacity Analysis Four roadway corridors surrounding the site were studied by Spack (France and York Avenues, West 70th Street and Hazelton Road), as well as 10 adjacent intersections along those corridors (see Figure 2). Figure 2: Study Intersections All study corridors are projected to operate within their planning level capacities (volume-to-capacity ratio of less than 1.0) through the 2040 build scenario. However, West 70th Street between France and York Avenues is projected to approach the almost congested level (volume-to-capacity ratio near 0.8) in the 2025 and 2040 build scenarios. All signalized and roundabout study intersections are projected to operate with acceptable overall intersection delays through the 2040 build scenario except for France Avenue and West 70th Street. This intersection experiences overall delays at Level of Service (LOS) E during the 2025 and 2040 build scenarios. Additionally, higher than preferred queuing is experienced for specific movements at each signalized study intersection. These queues are a product of the extended cycle lengths and green time given to France and York Avenues. Except for at France Avenue and West 70th Street, updated signal timing removes the queuing conditions at these intersections and return queues to similar or less than the existing scenario. The deficiencies at France Avenue and West 70th Street are recommended by Spack to be addressed by: 1. Constructing a dedicated northbound right turn lane for the existing RIRO development access; 2. Converting the existing eastbound dedicated right turn lane into a shared through/right turn lane; and 3. Constructing a second eastbound through lane east of France Avenue that converts into a dedicated right turn lane for the proposed RIRO development access. While these recommendations improve level of service for vehicles, they may have negative impacts on other modes of transportation. Adding a second eastbound through lane will likely require converting the existing shared on-street bike lane to an off-street facility shared with pedestrians. Additional public right-of-way would likely be required along France Avenue and West 70th Street to accommodate the recommended additional vehicle lanes, boulevards and shared pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Spack also noted that if traffic volumes remain lower than 2018 levels due to the current effects of the COVID- 19 pandemic, all study intersections are forecast to operate acceptably without mitigation. Parking Analysis City Code requires a minimum of 1,385 parking stalls for this mixed-use development and 1,202 parking stalls are proposed on-site. Spack evaluated parking demand for the proposed development using national parking demand data from ITE’s Parking Generation, 5th Edition and Twin Cities data collected by Spack. Table 1 compares the number of proposed parking stalls with the City requirements and estimated demand. Land Use National Data (ITE) Local Data (Spack) Proposed Required by City Code Residential (mid rise) 144 75 Residential (high rise) 264 183 Residential Subtotal 408 258 496 664 Non-Residential (office) 365 217 Non-Residential (supermarket) 147 182 Non-Residential (shopping center) 6 21 Non-Residential (bank) 24 33 Non-Residential (coffee/donut shop) 16 16 Non-Residential Subtotal 558 469 706 721 Total 966 727 1,202 1,385 Table 1: Proposed Parking Stalls vs. City Requirements and Estimated Demand Spack recommended that a parking variance be granted as the proposed parking supply exceeds the estimated parking demand based on both national and local data. Multi-Modal Facilities 7001 France Avenue is currently bordered by a 5’ boulevard-style sidewalk along West 70th Street to the north and an 8’ boulevard-style concrete path along France Avenue to the west. Shared bike lanes are present along West 70th Street to the north. There are a small number of internal sidewalks and no pedestrian or bicycle connections to either neighboring property (Brandon Square Mall to the east and Rue de France mall to the South) other than along the France Avenue or West 70th Street. The site is less than a 1/10 mile from the Edina Promenade, which provides walking and biking connections to Centennial Lakes Park and the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. The only new facilities proposed by the 2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan adjacent to the site are buffered bike lanes on France Avenue. While there are no transit stops immediately adjacent to 7001 France Avenue, Metro Transit operates several routes nearby accessible by existing pedestrian and bicycle facilities:  Local Routes 6 and 538 have stops less than ¼ mile away (less than a 5-minute walk) along West 70th Street and Hazelton Road, respectively. These routes connect to the Southdale Transit Center and several commercial/industrial areas in southeastern Edina; Uptown and Downtown Minneapolis; Best Buy Corporate Headquarters in Richfield; and Southtown and the Mall of America/South Loop in Bloomington.  Express Route 578 has stops less than ½ mile away (less than a 10-minute walk) along York Avenue. This route connects southeastern Edina to Downtown Minneapolis. In addition to these existing routes, Metro Transit is in the process of developing the E Line bus rapid transit (BRT) service, which will replace portions of Local Route 6 with faster and more reliable service. The southernmost stop, at the Southdale Transit Center, will be less than ½ mile from 7001 France Avenue (or less than a 10-minute walk). The E Line is proposed to operate along France Avenue between Southdale, Uptown/Downtown Minneapolis and the University of Minnesota – Twin Cities campus. Pending full funding, construction could begin as early as 2023. Compliance with Transportation Plans/Policies Table 2 details the ways in which the proposed redevelopment supports current City transportation plans and policies. Table 2: Compliance with Transportation Plans/Policies 2018 Comprehensive Plan Goal Assessment 1. Improve mobility for residents, visitors and businesses with a balanced system of transportation alternatives for transit users, pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists. The project provides facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists and shared mobility users. 2. Implement a fully multi-modal transportation system that supports the land use vision and future land use plan for managing and shaping future growth. The project provides facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists and shared mobility users. 3. Minimize the impacts of the transportation system on Edina’s environment and neighborhood quality of life and emphasize methods to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Sketch plan narrative notes electric vehicle (EV) charging stations will be included on-site and the development questionnaire notes that 50% of the private parking levels will be wired for future electric vehicle charging. Staff recommends installing EV chargers for a minimum of 5% of proposed parking (61 stalls) in addition to wiring 45% (540 stalls) for EV conversion in the future. These stalls should be in convenient locations near primary building entrances. 4. Reduce the overall dependence on and use of single- occupancy vehicles by promoting land use patterns that allow for shorter vehicle trips and the use of alternative travel options. The project promotes walking and biking with varied adjacent land uses and facilities for pedestrians and bicyclists. 6. Encourage and support attractive and reliable high- performance transit service and connections. The applicant should consider providing directional signage/information for local transit services or subsidizing transit passes for tenants and employees. 7. Develop and manage parking provisions to encourage joint and shared use of facilities, ride- sharing and bicycle parking. Sketch plan narrative notes on-site parking stalls for car sharing service (i.e. HourCar) will be included. These stalls should be in convenient locations near primary building entrances. The project is proposed to include a minimum of 61 bicycle parking stalls, 5% of the proposed parking stalls per City Code. These parking stalls should be in convenient, well-lit locations within 50’ of a public entrance to a principal building. Rack style and spacing should follow the recommendations of the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (APBP). A bike repair station is also proposed for the site and should be located adjacent to bike parking. 9. Provide for efficient movement of goods within Edina, while minimizing the impacts of freight traffic on other trips and reducing negative impacts on land uses on freight corridors. Turning movements and travel routes for delivery vehicles should be reviewed by the applicant. Steps should be taken to minimize the impact of delivery vehicles on pedestrian and bicycle movement through the site (additional signage, designated delivery zones, etc.) 13. Provide and maintain adequate access to and from, and safety on, local and regional roadway adjacent to community redevelopment and other activity that potentially impacts the City of Edina. Proposed trees, vegetation, signage and other items adjacent to intersections should maintain a clear view zone as defined in Section 26-190 of City Code. 14. Manage, maintain and operate roadways to maximize wherever possible the safety and mobility of all users and all modes. Proposed sidewalks/trails along France Avenue and West 70th Street should maintain 8’ minimum width to accommodate shared pedestrian and bicycle traffic. The existing vegetated boulevards should be maintained or widened to improve user safety and comfort. Living Streets Plan (2015) Principle Explanation 2. Living Streets provide access and mobility for all transportation modes while enhancing safety and convenience for all users. The project provides accommodations for motorists, cyclists and pedestrians. 4. The City will require new developments to provide interconnected street and sidewalk networks that connect to existing or planned streets or sidewalks on the perimeter of the development. The project includes network of internal streets and sidewalks that connect to existing facilities along the perimeter of the development. 10. Living Streets are designed and built with coordination between business and property owners along commercial corridors to develop vibrant commercial districts. The applicant should consider additional pedestrian and bicycle crossings/connections to Brandon Square Mall to the east and Rue de France mall to the south. 13. Living Streets will improve the current and future quality of life for the public. The proposed boulevard-style sidewalk along France Avenue will improve pedestrian safety and comfort adjacent to the property. Similar style sidewalks should be considered along West 70th Street and along the proposed internal streets. Greater Southdale District Plan (2018) Transportation Goals Explanation 1-A. Regional Roadway Access Maintain adequate regional vehicle accessibility while also minimizing its negative impacts on Greater Southdale area circulation, not only regarding cars and vehicle deliveries, but also transit and bicycle usage, and pedestrian convenience and comfort. The project is expected to result in unacceptable peak hour delays at France Avenue and West 70th Street (LOS E) for the 2025 and 2040 build scenarios. Signal timing updates are recommended to mitigate this effect. 1-B. Street Grid Establish a district-wide grid system based on blocks that are approximately 200’ x 200’. Grids are highly connected street networks that are essential for neighborhoods that balance public and private life. To the extent that grids enhance property access, they are important for unlocking land value, increasing economic benefits. The site is proposed to be divided into four “development pads” with internal streets and sidewalks. 1-C. Internal Roadways Develop prototype streetscape designs for new streets/roadways created as part of and to service redevelopment, and for possible redesign of existing streets/roadways, emphasizing legibility, pedestrian safety and comfort, street trees and other greenery, energy- efficient, pedestrian-scale lighting, and sustainability and stormwater management techniques. Sketch plan identifies amenities like boulevard trees, marked crosswalks, and stormwater management features. 1-E. Mobility Hub Develop a strategy for a mobility hub(s) that would: 1. Connect different modes of travel – walking, biking, transit, and shared mobility; 2. Integrate information technology to help travelers find, access and pay for transit and on-demand shared mobility services; and Enhance mobility for travelers of all ages and abilities. Sketch plan narrative notes on-site parking stalls for car sharing service (i.e. HourCar) will be included. These stalls should be placed in visible, convenient locations near pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Some exposed parking stalls could be converted to shared bike/scooter parking in the future. 1-G. Parking and Loading Develop a plan to establish public District shared parking facilities in key locations to service public facilities and/or to augment private parking. Future-proof parking structures by requiring flexibility and adaptability in above-ground parking structure for possible future changes in use, addressing such issues as floor-to-ceiling height and other relevant features. The proposed parking supply exceeds estimated demand by 236-472 stalls, allowing additional capacity for shared district parking. 2-A. Signature/Gateway Roadways Transform France Avenue, York Avenue, and West 66th Street with traffic-calming measures and beautification measures to discourage an increase in through traffic, enhance pedestrian/bicyclist/transit user safety and comfort, promote adjacent neighborhood livability, and establish a deeper sense of arrival and sense of place for the Greater Southdale District. Extend the identity of the Greater Southdale District beyond its edges while conversely sharing the value of its amenity with neighboring residential areas, i.e. establishing a seam rather than a border. Sketch plan narrative identifies amenities along France Avenue like boulevard trees, rain gardens, gathering areas and an “entry plaza” at the corner of France Avenue and West 70th Street. 2-B Pedestrian Circulation Create additional opportunities for pedestrians to safely and comfortably cross France and York Avenues by increasing the number of signalized intersections, including mid-block connections or other measures where appropriate, thus reducing the posted speed on these streets and facilitating a slower and more effective traffic signal progression for through traffic. Determine design and costs for: 1. New pedestrian/bike/vehicular intersections; and 2. New pedestrian/bike intersections. Create expanded sidewalks, with double rows of tree canopy, on France Avenue, York Avenue, and West 66th Street. Sketch plan proposes two pedestrian/bicycle facilities along France Avenue (one straight and wide, one meandering and narrow), with rows of trees, vegetation and landscaping on either side. 2-C. Bicycle System and Facilities Provide a continuous, on-site route for bicycles that is connected to east/west streets penetrating the site and to provide access to the adjacent neighborhoods. Applicant should consider widening internal sidewalks to 8’ (minimum) to accommodate shared pedestrian and bicycle use or install bicycle pavement markings on internal streets. Applicant should consider directional signage to the Edina Promenade and the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. Travel Demand Management Opportunities The applicant has proposed several strategies to support alternative modes of transportation to, from and within the site and reduce the impact of motor vehicles in the neighborhood. These include:  EV charging stations  Bicycle parking and a bicycle repair station  Internal and perimeter sidewalks with boulevard trees, landscaping, and other buffers between motor vehicle traffic  Marked pedestrian crosswalks  Designated parking stalls for car sharing service (i.e. HourCar) Other strategies to consider implementing (as previously mentioned) include:  Designating 5% of proposed parking (61 stalls) for EVs and making an additional 5% (61 stalls) equipped for EV conversion in the future. These stalls should be in convenient locations near primary building entrances.  Installing bicycle parking stalls in convenient, well-lit locations within 50’ of a public entrance to a principal building. Rack style and spacing should follow the recommendations of the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (APBP). The proposed bike repair station should be located adjacent to bike parking.  Widening internal sidewalks to 8’ (minimum) to accommodate shared pedestrian and bicycle use or installing bicycle pavement markings on internal streets.  Maintaining or widening the existing vegetated boulevards to improve user safety and comfort.  Providing additional pedestrian and bicycle crossings/connections to Brandon Square Mall to the east and Rue de France mall to the south.  Placing car sharing parking stalls in visible, convenient locations near pedestrian and bicycle facilities.  Minimizing the impact of delivery vehicles on pedestrian and bicycle movement through the site (directional signage, designated delivery zones, etc.).  Providing directional signage/information for transportation amenities (adjacent transit services, bicycle parking, car sharing, adjacent parks/trails).  Subsidizing transit passes for tenants and employees. Transportation Commission Comments Members of the Transportation Commission were given an opportunity to provide comments on the TIS and other transportation impacts of the proposed development. These comments are reflective of individual Commissioners, not the entire Commission;  Support pedestrian and bicycle connections to neighboring properties (Brandon Square Mall and Rue de France).  Support the bike repair station.  Support reviewing turning movements and travel routes for delivery vehicles.  Disappointed in lack of a balanced multi-modal approach that accommodates pedestrians and bicycles equally to vehicles.  Recommend more than 61 proposed bike parking stalls given the retail uses in the area.  Recommend abiding by the assumption that vehicle traffic will return to normal levels after the pandemic and considering the parking/capacity analyses accordingly.  Recommend reviewing delivery vehicle parking accommodations.  Recommend shared use paths be a minimum of 8’ and preferable 10’ to separate bicycles from pedestrians. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 14000Pressure (psi)Flow (gpm) 70TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENT Flow Curve Hydrant Flow Curve Hydraulic Model Assumtions: Average day demand, Water towers at 10' below overflow, Well Pumps OFF Static Pressure +/-87 psiFire Flow = 7,000 gpm @ 20 psi INPUT DESCRIPTIONINPUT VALUEUNITSOUTPUT DESCRIPTIONOUTPUT VALUEUNITSUNITSVINEdina CobraAVERAGE TIRE TURNING ANGLE LEFT39.7DEGREESWHEELBASE258INCHESAVERAGE TIRE TURNING ANGLE RIGHT39.7DEGREESFRONT AXLESteerTek 24KAVERAGE REAR AXLE TURNING RADIUS LEFT310.7INCHES25.9FEETFRONT AXLE KPI70.87INCHESAVERAGE REAR AXLE TURNING RADIUS RIGHT310.7INCHES25.9FEETFRONT AXLE TRACK95.01INCHESOUTSIDE REAR AXLE TURNING RADIUS LEFT361.7INCHES30.1FEETFRONT TIREMichelin XFE 425/65R22.5OUTSIDE REAR AXLE TURNING RADIUS RIGHT361.7INCHES30.1FEETFRONT TIRE OVERALL WIDTH16.6INCHESINSIDE REAR AXLE TURNING RADIUS LEFT259.7INCHES21.6FEETFRONT WHEELAlcoa 12.25 X 22.5 AlINSIDE REAR AXLE TURNING RADIUS RIGHT259.7INCHES21.6FEETFRONT WHEEL INSET4.68INCHESFRONT AXLE TO FRONT OF GRILL79.37INCHESFRONT BUMPER LENGTH24INCHESFRONT BUMPER WIDTH102INCHESFRONT BUMPER CORNER RADIUS (R) OR CHAMFER (C)? RFRONT BUMPER CORNER RADIUS9 INCHESLEFT TURN CRAMP INSIDE ANGLE43DEGREESLEFT TURN CRAMP OUTSIDE ANGLE36.41DEGREESRIGHT TURN CRAMP INSIDE ANGLE43DEGREESRIGHT TURN CRAMP OUTSIDE ANGLE36.41DEGREESOUTPUT DESCRIPTIONOUTPUT VALUEUNITSUNITSTURNING RADIUS LEFT441.5INCHES36.8FEETTURNING RADIUS RIGHT441.5INCHES36.8FEETCURB‐TO‐CURB RADIUS LEFT449.8INCHES37.5FEETCURB‐TO‐CURB RADIUS RIGHT449.8INCHES37.5FEETWALL‐TO‐WALL RADIUS LEFT507.6INCHES42.3FEETWALL‐TO‐WALL RADIUS RIGHT507.6INCHES42.3FEETRosenbauer Motors v. 10282015mjbTURNING RADIUS CALCULATIONS BASED ON AVERAGE OF INNER AND OUTER FRONT WHEEL CRAMP ANGLES INPUT DESCRIPTIONINPUT VALUEUNITSOUTPUT DESCRIPTIONOUTPUT VALUEUNITSUNITSVINEdina PumpersAVERAGE TIRE TURNING ANGLE LEFT40.6DEGREESWHEELBASE203INCHESAVERAGE TIRE TURNING ANGLE RIGHT40.6DEGREESFRONT AXLESteerTek 20KAVERAGE REAR AXLE TURNING RADIUS LEFT236.6INCHES19.7FEETFRONT AXLE KPI70.87INCHESAVERAGE REAR AXLE TURNING RADIUS RIGHT236.6INCHES19.7FEETFRONT AXLE TRACK95.01INCHESOUTSIDE REAR AXLE TURNING RADIUS LEFT287.6INCHES24.0FEETFRONT TIREX Multiway HD XZE 385OUTSIDE REAR AXLE TURNING RADIUS RIGHT287.6INCHES24.0FEETFRONT TIRE OVERALL WIDTH15.1INCHESINSIDE REAR AXLE TURNING RADIUS LEFT185.6INCHES15.5FEETFRONT WHEELAlcoa 12.25 X 22.5 AlINSIDE REAR AXLE TURNING RADIUS RIGHT185.6INCHES15.5FEETFRONT WHEEL INSET4.68INCHESFRONT AXLE TO FRONT OF GRILL79.37INCHESFRONT BUMPER LENGTH24INCHESFRONT BUMPER WIDTH102INCHESFRONT BUMPER CORNER RADIUS (R) OR CHAMFER (C)? RFRONT BUMPER CORNER RADIUS0.125 INCHESLEFT TURN CRAMP INSIDE ANGLE45DEGREESLEFT TURN CRAMP OUTSIDE ANGLE36.26DEGREESRIGHT TURN CRAMP INSIDE ANGLE45DEGREESRIGHT TURN CRAMP OUTSIDE ANGLE36.26DEGREESOUTPUT DESCRIPTIONOUTPUT VALUEUNITSUNITSTURNING RADIUS LEFT349.2INCHES29.1FEETTURNING RADIUS RIGHT349.2INCHES29.1FEETCURB‐TO‐CURB RADIUS LEFT356.7INCHES29.7FEETCURB‐TO‐CURB RADIUS RIGHT356.7INCHES29.7FEETWALL‐TO‐WALL RADIUS LEFT420.2INCHES35.0FEETWALL‐TO‐WALL RADIUS RIGHT420.2INCHES35.0FEETRosenbauer Motors v. 10282015mjbTURNING RADIUS CALCULATIONS BASED ON AVERAGE OF INNER AND OUTER FRONT WHEEL CRAMP ANGLES October 7, 2021 Cary Teague, Community Development Director David Fisher, Chief Building Official 70th & France Ave Information / Background: A High Rise Apartment Building with a Parking Ramp and Other Buildings. - This would be using the 2020 Minnesota State Building Code with the 2018 International Building Code. - This would be using the 2020 Minnesota State Fire Code with the 2018 International Fire Code. - NFPA 13-Fire Sprinkler System is required. - Verify Fire Department access. - Verify the addresses. - Recommend meeting with staff for 30, 60 and 90 percent meeting before submitted for building permit. - Recommend escrow is provided with the demo and new building permits to assure City standards are met for code compliance. - Notify Contractor about hour of construction 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Friday, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Saturday and no work on Sunday and holidays. A construction management plan will be required at time of building permit providing a tentative schedule for construction. - Provide documentation where all construction workers will be parking through the construction process at time of building permit. Survey Responses 30 January 2019 - 25 October 2021 Public Hearing Comments-70th & FranceRevision Better Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: A revision to the approved re-development plans for the southeast corner of 70th and France (7001 & 7025 France Ave. S). VISITORS 141 CONTRIBUTORS 30 RESPONSES 30 1 Registered 0 Unverified 29 Anonymous 1 Registered 0 Unverified 29 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 02, 2021 17:36:38 pm Last Seen:Oct 02, 2021 17:36:38 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Kelly Veit Q2.Address 6809 Cornelia Drive Q3.Comment The new revisions presented by the developer are absolutely ridiculous. They pushed through their goal of a 24 story apartment building with the lure of a “work force” housing apartment building. By the end of the intitial conversation regarding this property they changed their tune to “ we will look into possibly providing affordable housing” (I am loosely quoting here, but they changed their tune at the final meeting). Now they want to put a parking garage instead. If anyone would pay attention to the Greater Southdale Design Plan, this is no way works with that. Why would you possibly need a huge parking garage for the proposed 1500sqft of retail? A large parking garage was not required for the initial plan of two rather large residence buildings. Why now? There is absolutely no need for a parking garage. There is also no need for a 24 story residence, but the city council that voted that in felt differently from the city residents. I feel that the council needs to table this project. It is not right for the area. Please look at the parking garage at 70th and York as an example. It creates a wall to the shopping area at the galleria. You can’t walk through it, it’s ugly and it does nothing to add to the area. I suspect that the parking garage is also never fully utilized. Wait until something more appropriate comes available for this development. Respondent No:2 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 02, 2021 22:26:19 pm Last Seen:Oct 02, 2021 22:26:19 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Brandt Uthus Q2.Address 6929 Cornelia Drive Q3.Comment Cornelia Drive is a cut through that people take to avoid the traffic and congestion at 70th and France. I live on Cornelia Drive. My wife and I have 3 young kids. Within a span of 6 houses there are 15 young kids. Traffics and SPEED of traffic on Cornelia Drive is extremely dangerous and has only gotten worse as development on France has caused people to seek more efficient routes for travel. This new project will almost certainly exacerbate the problem. Overall I support the project, but if Cornelia Drive traffic and speed of traffic isn’t dealt with, the City is going to experience a tragic accident. Please address traffic on Cornelia Drive as a consequence for this new project. Respondent No:3 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 03, 2021 08:38:26 am Last Seen:Oct 03, 2021 08:38:26 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Marilyn Listvan Q2.Address 5509 Highland Road, Edina, MN 55436-2535 Q3.Comment This proposed change seems like “bait and switch”. Edina needs to keep focused on providing affordable housing for sustaining (or creating) a vibrant, diverse population. While parking is important, that should have been considered in the original proposal and should not be switched in at the elimination of affordable housing!! Respondent No:4 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 03, 2021 15:41:17 pm Last Seen:Oct 03, 2021 15:41:17 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Eva Lockhart Q2.Address 4448 Fondell Drive Q3.Comment A twenty four story building here, at the actual edge of a residential, single family neighborhood, with an elementary school only blocks away, is absolutely NOT what we need or every should have in Edina. The shadow of this building alone is an issue for everyone living in very close vicinity of this building. We currently have 4-6 story apartment buildings on very busy roads, with no single family housing, nor schools nearby (such as at the intersections of 66th and Xerxes (York) Avenues, yet here, with single family homes, and people walking, strolling with children and pets and small children walking to school, you want A 24 STORY BUILDING?! This is outrageous and completely not acceptable to the neighborhood! No one is complaining about having affordable housing here; no one was complaining about an apartment building, but 24 floors? How many houses will change their view from trees and shrubs to a giant glass tower? How many more people will be taking short cuts through the neighborhood to speed up their commute if they are driving up 70th from highway 100 or crosstown 62? Hundreds more people will live in such a building, versus the one that was originally planned. Would YOU or any of the commissioners and/or mayor enjoy living within two to three blocks of this size building? We did not all move to Edina in order to live next to skyscrapers! This is so out of line. It is one thing, in a purely commercial and high density zone (like the street on which Byerly's can be accessed as well as Target) for a large scale design like this to go up. For it to appear with a half block of single family homes is absurd, and dangerous as far as traffic flow is concerned. Small children walking to and from school would suddenly encounter how many hundreds more cars as people cut through the neighborhood for short cuts? We already hear racing cars along highway 100 and 494 at night, and now they'll race through our neighborhood as well? This is unsafe, will look unsightly and how many more hundreds of apartment buildings are really needed in our city? Why aren't 4-6 story condominiums or townhomes being built here instead? Or, at the very least, affordable housing in a normal scale building? This is a real affront to Edina residents and an insult to our intelligence to assume we would all be okay with this! I am disgusted and appalled by this. Rethink this proposal NOW! Respondent No:5 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 03, 2021 16:02:41 pm Last Seen:Oct 03, 2021 16:02:41 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Gregg Swedberg Q2.Address 6700 Brittany Rd, Edina Q3.Comment There is no place in Edina for 24 stories of ANYTHING. The Council never should have approved the plan in the first place. The idea that now we have to replace affordable housing with an 8-story parking ramp is even more ludicrous. In what world do we need or want 8 stories of parking (higher than the Mall of America) in Edina? I appreciate that density is desired and necessary. But does it all have to be done NOW? And all in one block? Can we not build up to a development of this size to meet a demand instead of speculating on one? Until this area gets more infrastructure, it will cause traffic headaches. Please plan ahead. Respondent No:6 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 04, 2021 15:52:40 pm Last Seen:Oct 04, 2021 15:52:40 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Jane Fandrey Q2.Address 7320 Glouchester Drive / Edina Q3.Comment I’m curious where the children in this development will go to school. Presumably in a development this large, even if most renters/owners are assumed to be childless, there will be a fairly large number of kids. Cornelia Elementary seems to be at maximum attendance. Further, I really don’t like the appearance of the building. I don’t love the ticky tacky office building appearance and think that something a little less industrial/glass block would be pleasanter. Surely there’s a middle ground between Louis Sullivan’s early skyscrapers and this, something that might evoke the idea that humans live within it, rather than bytes in a data farm. I appreciate the thought that’s gone into keep the human element at street level and the parks (even though in practice I’ve found parks in this type of development to feel a little cold and alienating, meant more for looking good in a brochure than for actual use), and I hope that some decent retail is found to fill the space. Respondent No:7 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 04, 2021 19:09:54 pm Last Seen:Oct 04, 2021 19:09:54 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Sam Sturm Q2.Address 7121 Bristol Blvd; Edina, MN 55435 Q3.Comment These plans for a new US Bank branch, a 24-story apartment, a office/retail building, and a parking ramp don't excite me very much. There isn't much planned with this new development for us local residents to enjoy or look forward to. When I think of the Southdale region, I think of visionary developments such as Southdale Mall and Centennial Lakes. Both the mall and the park can be used by the public year-round. Both make this area a desirable place to live for people who live in the greater region. Now, it seems like the Southdale area is now getting a lot of new apartments to increase the density of people, but we're not committed to incorporating new public spaces with these new developments like those in the old tradition. Why can't this new development bring new public, recreational space to the area just live Centenial Lakes did? This development doesn't even seem to include a water feature to look at, let alone any space for activities. If nothing else, my hope is a 24 story building is not built in this location. A building this tall would seem out-of-place - even with the 16- story Bauer nearby - and block a lot of my sight-lines from my east-facing windows. Respondent No:8 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 05, 2021 10:19:53 am Last Seen:Oct 05, 2021 10:19:53 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Karen Huffman Q2.Address 4724 Dunberry Lane Q3.Comment A 24-story apartment building?? Are you kidding? Because we are without sufficient public transportation, traffic will be a nightmare—an ugly 8-level parking facility ensures that! Edina needs NO more apartment buildings! Please keep our city a desirable place to live, not just another bedroom community. Respondent No:9 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 07, 2021 05:49:11 am Last Seen:Oct 07, 2021 05:49:11 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name John Haugen Q2.Address 5709 Beard Ave S Q3.Comment The city needs to publish here why the developer removed the 9 story apartment building and why 9 stories of parking are necessary. Showing the changes to the plan without explanation does not serve public understanding. That amount of parking seems excessive. Respondent No:10 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 08, 2021 08:43:07 am Last Seen:Oct 08, 2021 08:43:07 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Ronald Scholder Q2.Address 6328 Interlachen Blvd. Q3.Comment Looks like an awesome development and a meaningful one for the City of Edina! Respondent No:11 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 08, 2021 11:25:30 am Last Seen:Oct 08, 2021 11:25:30 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Angela Chapman Q2.Address 5509 Parkwood Lane Q3.Comment I am in favor to have this project move forward! I love living in Edina and I have no doubt in my mind that this space needs to be redeveloped! The plans look amazing and the city of Edina will be even better once this project is built. Thank you! Respondent No:12 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 08, 2021 18:53:53 pm Last Seen:Oct 08, 2021 18:53:53 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Judson Welliver Q2.Address 5211 Larada Lane Q3.Comment Great project! Respondent No:13 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 10, 2021 05:30:08 am Last Seen:Oct 10, 2021 05:30:08 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Joshua Miskovich Q2.Address 5312 Forslin Drive Edina, Mn 55436 Q3.Comment I feel that this project is good for Edina as a fresh facelift, modern technologies, energy efficient and many more reasons such as providing additional local jobs are all reasons to give this area a nee facelift. Respondent No:14 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 11, 2021 06:46:58 am Last Seen:Oct 11, 2021 06:46:58 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name robert carlson and wife of 49 yrs... LINDA Q2.Address 5250 Grandview Square 2105 Edina 55436 Q3.Comment While the existing plan was quite nice we understand the need in this rapidly changing market for the revised development plan and support it wholeheartedly for the following reasons: 1. The lower density appeals to us in that location especially when a convenient parking ramp is included for the convenience of all including those of us who are a bit handicapped. 2. The new plan is practical and very pedestrian friendly. 3. The buildings are attractive - They incorporate current architectural design with good looking elevations that are not overbearing and compliment the entire area.. 4 The entire City will come to live work and enjoy a fun experience with the exclusion of no one. A very inclusive philosophy is a real objective of the developer who has provided Edina residents with previous successful projects. These guys do what they promise. Linda an I are in our 70s now. Have been Edina residents since 2012 and at our age want to enjoy this area ASAP. Please find it in your thinking to accommodate us and all Edina folks and approve this revision this year!! Sincerely Bob and Linda Respondent No:15 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 11, 2021 08:07:58 am Last Seen:Oct 11, 2021 08:07:58 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Patrick Judge Q2.Address 4707, Townes Road Q3.Comment This looks great and should be an excellent addition to the area. Respondent No:16 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 11, 2021 14:34:53 pm Last Seen:Oct 11, 2021 14:34:53 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Ryan Hartung Q2.Address 5115 Arden Avenue Q3.Comment This looks like a beautiful project and will provide a massive upgrade to the area. Respondent No:17 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 12, 2021 09:51:20 am Last Seen:Oct 12, 2021 09:51:20 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Seth Cogswell Q2.Address 4519 West 56th Street Q3.Comment The current US Bank building is dated and a bit of an eye sore. Given the numerous new and attractive developments in the vicinity, the proposed plan would be a significant, needed improvement. Let's keep the forward progress going. Respondent No:18 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 12, 2021 12:50:24 pm Last Seen:Oct 12, 2021 12:50:24 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name David Hardt Q2.Address 5212 kellogg ave Edina, MN Q3.Comment As a home owner in Edina and business owner with an office building only a few blocks from this site, I'm fully supportive of this plan! More jobs to Edina is a good thing! Respondent No:19 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 12, 2021 13:08:04 pm Last Seen:Oct 12, 2021 13:08:04 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Mary Jane Hackett Q2.Address 5801 Vernon Lane Q3.Comment This rendering looks amazing! Quite an upgrade to that corner. This is a great project and very well thought.out. Mortenson is the local builder to make it happen. Respondent No:20 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 12, 2021 13:51:30 pm Last Seen:Oct 12, 2021 13:51:30 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Jena Cogswell Q2.Address 4519 W 56th Street, Edina MN 55424 Q3.Comment I am strongly advocating for the redevelopment of 7001 and 7025 France Ave South. The current building is outdated and under utilized. This is a great opportunity for commerce and community, at a prime location that is easily accessible. Respondent No:21 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 12, 2021 15:10:07 pm Last Seen:Oct 12, 2021 15:10:07 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name David Dickey Q2.Address 5021 Yvonne Terrace Q3.Comment What a cool development and asset for the Southdale retail and residential core.” I would appreciate it and use it! Respondent No:22 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 13, 2021 05:26:45 am Last Seen:Oct 13, 2021 05:26:45 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Hali Stafford Q2.Address 4912 Merilane Ave Q3.Comment My family has lived in Edina for the past 8 years after moving all across the country. We welcome the continued improvement and development of the Southdale area, specifically to include more high end shopping and dining options. This entire project will bring much needed life and energy to that area and we welcome it with open arms. Respondent No:23 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 13, 2021 17:00:11 pm Last Seen:Oct 13, 2021 17:00:11 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Mark Chamberlain Q2.Address 7004 Bristol Blvd Q3.Comment Five to six years ago the City hired consultant Mic Johnson for the Southdale Redevelopment Work Group. I attended many of those meetings during the first year, and heard Mr. Johnson tell the group that redevelopment along France Ave should only be 4 stories with a 50' setback, and that you should build higher as you move into the core between France and York, with 6-8 stories next and the tallest buildings in the middle. That way the shorter buildings in front will "hide" the taller buildings from the Cornelia neighborhood to the west. And I don't recall those taller buildings being 20 - 24 stories, rather more like 12 - 14. In 2017 when the 20 and 24 story Estelle project was proposed at 69th & France, which was fortunately rejected by the Council, a Councilmember lamented that if only the project was only on the east side of France Ave., then he would be okay with it. Really? Are you kidding me? Why would buildings 5 to 6 times taller than the City's paid Consultant recommended be okay just because they are along France Avenue on the east side? That's less than a football field further from the Cornelia neighborhood than if they were on the west side of France, and there's no way you can "hide" a 24 story building with shorter buildings in front of it when the 24 story building is on the corner lot. What a waste of time and money was spent on the Redevelopment Plan, when like the Comp Plan, it is totally ignored. All this oversized redevelopment does nothing for existing residents, many who have lived here for decades and have paid tens of thousands of dollars in property taxes to the City. All we get out of it is more congestion, an unsightly skyline, and a City that still wants to raise our taxes over 8% this year despite all the increased revenues they are receiving from other recent redevelopments. It seems the City is more interested in attracting new, more transient residents than they are in protecting existing neighborhoods and the desires of residents who are more likely stakeholders in the community. In my opinion, existing residents' best interests are not being well served by our current Council and City staff. Respondent No:24 Login:MichaelLund Email:mlund@launchproperties.co m Responded At:Oct 13, 2021 17:43:41 pm Last Seen:Oct 14, 2021 00:38:36 am IP Address:73.94.53.44 Q1.First and Last Name Michael Lund Q2.Address 5608 Dale Avenue Q3.Comment I have lived in Edina since 1990. I have seen the dramatic transformation of the old Guitar Center site. I think this site will be equally transformative and provide a high-quality project to the residents of Edina with many amenities. I have known Ted and his team for many years, and his latest projects down on 44th and France are representative of his high-quality standards and vision for the future of Edina. Respondent No:25 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 14, 2021 12:32:48 pm Last Seen:Oct 14, 2021 12:32:48 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Kyle Vorachek Q2.Address 6425 Indian Hills Rd, Edina, MN 55439 Q3.Comment I fully support this re-development. This corner has been an unsightly property for too-long. The proposed plan will help continue the beautification of the city. Not only that, it appears it will help increase population density and livability of the France Ave. area. Having more residents can only further attract investment to the area. Please approve this plan! Respondent No:26 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 18, 2021 11:31:20 am Last Seen:Oct 18, 2021 11:31:20 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Keith Ballard Q2.Address 7412 Coventry Way, Edina, MN 55439 Q3.Comment As a longtime resident of Edina we really appreciate efforts to improve our City. The US Bank building is old, tired, and is not reflective of what we want Edina to be. Our young family of three is in the Southdale district all the time, we drive or bike to the area, and we want this project to happen. This project brings the best of Edina together at one site: job creation, modern architecture, housing, and future expandability within the Southdale district. Please consider this our full endorsement of support for the proposed redevelopment. Respondent No:27 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 18, 2021 11:31:46 am Last Seen:Oct 18, 2021 11:31:46 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Max Hackett Q2.Address 5429 Park Pl Q3.Comment A big YES to this project. The current brick building is an eyesore and this would be a huge improvement in the area. Respondent No:28 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 18, 2021 14:55:26 pm Last Seen:Oct 18, 2021 14:55:26 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Toby McKenna Q2.Address 6241 Knoll Drive Q3.Comment I am excited to see this project take life. As both a U.S. Bank customer and an Edina resident, I believe this enhances the surrounding area and elevates the company’s physical footprint at this location. I fully support this project and look forward to seeing it come to life. Respondent No:29 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 18, 2021 15:12:57 pm Last Seen:Oct 18, 2021 15:12:57 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Jamie Ballard Q2.Address 7412 Coventry Way Q3.Comment I have been an Edina resident my entire life and fully support the proposed plans for 7001 France Ave. It would provide huge lifestyle, functionality, and aesthetic improvements for Edina and also attract consumers from the surrounding communities. The proposed updates on this prime corner of Edina are crucial for the future of our city and our long-term sustainability of being the premier suburb in the state of MN. Thank you! Respondent No:30 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 20, 2021 07:58:58 am Last Seen:Oct 20, 2021 07:58:58 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Josh O'Neill Q2.Address 3717 W. Fuller Street, Edina Q3.Comment I'm very impressed with how the developer and its partners have amended their plans to navigate through very challenging supply chain and pricing challenges. That is a very difficult task to accomplish and still make the project viable. This will be a great improvement to the France Avenue corridor and be done by a world class team with a superb portfolio of high quality projects. I strongly support this project and look forward to seeing it come to life. 2200 Zane Ave N | Minneapolis, MN 55422 www.archfieldoffice.com Cary: At your request, we reviewed the revised PUD submission for the proposed development at 70th and France (US Bank site) based on our experience working with the Greater Southdale Work Group to craft a physical vision for the future district, translating their guiding principles to the built environment. The resulting vision for development in the Greater Southdale District is to create an enhanced human experience along existing major and new connector streets, with overall experience shaped via landscape setbacks, building step backs, a hierarchy of street typologies, transparency at street level, a minimized impact of the car, and managing storm water as an amenity. The outcome of our collaborations with the Work Group is described in the urban design chapter of the Greater Southdale District Plan and resulted in the Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines. As you are aware, we have been supportive of this proposal in the past because it tried to balance financial concerns with the quality of the human experience along its streets and programmatic needs for parking to support primarily the office building component of the site. In its previous iteration, below grade parking was used on three of the building sites, leaving the US Bank site flexible for future possibilities as the market for retail/drive-up banks changes. The architecture tried to integrate material and architectural forms that would provide street continuity, with a program element within each building to support the experience at the street. Of note, the previous scheme shortened the parking plinth for the housing and created an east-west oriented plaza; this was helpful in mitigating the length of the housing building, and offering a cue to how 71st Street might develop as an eventual connection to the Promenade. Although we had concerns about the use of metal screen on the office building, there was a clear focus on the transparency and active retail at the ground floor. Above the parking levels, the office building stepped back, creating a strong façade on France Avenue to reinforce its stature as the District’s most notable street. Roof tops were programmed with activities and landscaping that would add to the development character and to the green goals of the district – which have all disappeared. Intense activity was imagined on three of the four building sites, with the southeastern block adding a diversity of housing types that honored the City’s greater focus on diversity and equity. However, as we look at the current work by the developer and architect, much of those human-centric elements have been replaced in favor of parking. By our calculations, 64% of all four building sites (not counting streets) in the current proposal have on-grade parking screened by metal screens, metal panel, and landscaping. This is no different than what the district in trying to overcome, with uninviting parking To City of Edina Cary Teague, Community Development Director 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 From Mic Johnson, FAIA Date October 1, 2021 2 lots and blank walls. In this proposal, it appears that an effort has gone into and emphasis on landscaping to attempt to sway the evaluation of the current project as having the potential to provide a rich and varied experience. There are many streets around the world that have little or no landscaping, and provide some of the most delightful experiences with only the activity of the shops, restaurants and front porches that stich people together and create a sense of community in a special place made and designed by them. Try to imagine the current proposal without landscaping. There would not be much to attract the casual stroller, shopper or even the people who might live in the tower to come down and be in the street. The current efforts to construct a viable community within these four very important blocks seems minimal by the development team. One of the most important aspects of the Design Experience Guidelines is centered around creating buildings that are equal on all four sides – with program space fronting all streets they face, all integrated throughout the district in support of the life of an evolving community. Not the way we have built in the past, with streets full of cars and land full of parking lots and utilities but rather a place made of green streets many of which will have no cars on them, with permeable paving, varied architecture and varied uses – with all building services, parking and site utilities that do not contribute to the life of the street and the activities of the community hidden from view. We have reviewed the Applicant’s submission in detail and while we have flagged a number of issues, following are a few of the primary concerns relative to the proposal’s adherence with the Design Experience Guidelines and the City’s vision for the future growth and evolution of the Greater Southdale District. Parking Design Experience Guideline Excerpt All parking, other than short-term retail or guest parking, and building services need to be located below grade or hidden within the building. If on ground level or above, parking and/or building services must be surrounded on all sides by program space such as commercial or housing. Applicant’s Response All proposed parking on Sites A, B, and C is enclosed within buildings with the exception of street parallel parking stalls which are encouraged for creating pedestrian safety and ease of access. Residential loading spaces for the site are planned with locations enclosed within the building as well as supplemental locations street side at strategic locations. Short-term guest stalls all are located at enclosed locations within the building for Site A and also accommodated in Site C’s ramp. AFO Comment Minimizing the visual impact of car storage was one of the primary tenets of the design guidelines put forward by the Work Group, as one the most important issues that would change the character of the district from car- oriented to pedestrian-oriented. The applicant has ignored this repeatedly throughout the proposal with no liner buildings or ground level program space. 3 Building Size Design Experience Guideline Excerpt No building façade can be longer than 200’ without changing direction by a minimum of 90 degrees. Applicant’s Response The new block plan size for the development particularly the north to south dimension for Sites A and B is driven by the location of the available access point on France Avenue and the desire to have Site D (US Bank) be smaller. Since this creates are greater dimension for Sites A and B there are instances where podiums for Sites A and B do not fully comply completely with this guidance. The design of the each of these dimensional lengths mitigates this deviation. Please see site plans for this submittal. AFO Comment The 200 x 200 foot grid pattern was not necessarily about specific block size or aligning streets into a perfect grid. It was conceived as a strategy to bring buildings back to a more human scale, where the pedestrian would experience diversity in material, pattern and shape of various buildings along a series of blocks. The height of street room was informed by the height of each wall of the building facing the street. The intent of the grid is about the pedestrian experience, not about aligning streets so you can drive your car through streets without turning. In our opinion, this misinterpretation of the 200 foot grid has been an assumption on the part of the development team and the cause of the large parking podium on site A. It points to balancing between the numbers of parking stalls available below and screened above grade parking and the number of the housing units. The diagram at left shows two blocks of more equal size on the east side of the site, separated by 71st Street. This street would provide access to parking and building services, and align future development with equal blocks on the east side connecting to the Promenade, while allowing Ewing to remain as the major pedestrian street through the development. A shared street aligning with the round-about would be developed in another phase of growth in the district. Street Typologies and Setbacks Design Experience Guideline Excerpt These streets, including 69th Street, 70th Street, Hazelton Road, Parklawn Avenue, and West 76th Street, serve an important role within the district. These are unique streets in that they form the district’s superblocks with France and York Avenues, keeping traffic out of adjacent single family neighborhoods while connecting to the neighborhoods through the 30 4 foot setbacks that are landscaped to provide a pedestrian focused experience. This typology is intended to respect the neighborhood scale and context in a meaningful way, with an ample tree canopy, extensive setbacks and consistently-scaled buildings at the face of the public realm. By employing these characteristics, the landscape experience of the single family residential neighborhoods is extended through the Greater Southdale District. Applicant’s Response Setbacks and building step-backs on 70th Street were not addressed in the applicant’s narrative. It can only be found in the diagrams. AFO Comment This guideline was developed to relate to the Cornelia Overlay and Transition Zones for all development close to single family neighborhoods. The desire was in part to create a very different kind of landscape with an affinity to typical front yards of neighborhoods and extend that experience along the east-west streets that form the district’s Super Blocks. The above diagram shows the setback alignments along 70th (in the dashed red line), 30 feet from the curb, and a building step back above 60 feet by another 30 feet. These dimensions are intended to support the transition from the single family neighborhoods and increase the potential for a more ‘residential’ scaled streetscape as a part of the characteristics of the transition zones. The applicant’s plan dimensions on page 57 of the civil narrative indicate 18’-3” building setback at the northwest corner of the site and 20’-7” building setback at the northeast corner of the site. In addition, the diagrams above, extracted from page 22 of the applicant’s design package do not meet the setback of 30 feet or stepbacks of 30 feet above the 60 foot podium. 5 Material Usage Design Experience Guideline Excerpt All facades on the first vertical 60 feet of a building (above grade) shall use natural materials facing the public realm. Above 50-60 feet, glass, precast panels with brick/tile are the preferred material palette. Metal panel can be used as a secondary part of a wall system. Applicant’s Response The building uses natural materials facing the public realm in this way. Please see exterior elevations for this submittal. AFO Comment Based on our review of the exterior elevations, we understand the following:  Site A: There are no natural materials below 60 feet. Approximately 25% of the base is precast, faux wood metal panel and glass, and 75% is metal panel screening for the parking garage.  Site B: the first floor is metal panel and glass, the remaining building façade is glass.  Site D: Glass and metal panel on the first floor, the remainder of the parking garage is metal panel. The intent of the guidelines is to build district character through the use of natural materials that represent the both quality and continuity of the public realm within the Southdale District. We know it will take time and imagination to create a cohesive material palette for the public realm, with each new project taking cues from existing material usage across the district. However, the applicant is not using natural materials on any of the three sites described in this proposal, but rather using materials that are out of context given the goals set forth in the Design Experience Guidelines. And lastly, there is no mention of the sustainability or resiliency of building systems and site development. There is no discussion about the role of green roofs in supporting rooftop programming and stormwater management, or on-grade waterways. There is no mention of permeable materials that would support stormwater retention or reflect less heat into the public realm. There is no discussion about how the exterior building systems and façade orientation might reduce the energy required to heat and cool the interior. There is no discussion about potential solar panels on the roofs and or other systems that might inform future actions to meet the climate crisis. All of which support discussion about the how to make a compact community that will meet individual, social, and cultural needs of the district in next 50 years going forward. Recommendations on Next Steps We understand there is a budget/proforma that must be paid attention to, and we know there is a program that must be met. But we also know there are many ways to solve design and program problems to meet an owner or developer’s budget and proforma. Many cities recognize their various districts and neighborhoods have a culture, a way of growing, a way of maintaining their character – or, in the case of Edina, a new way to see how they would like their community to work, look and feel. The Experience Guidelines were a result of this desire: to transform the past suburban context into a place without parking lots, or visible parking structures, into a place of blocks and streets that were focused on the experience of residents and visitors. The development should invite the community/neighbors to go to the site, to 6 walk through it, to stay – as a place that represents them. Everyone who will eventually live there will do so because they are excited to be there. The role of the City and the community is to provide guidance to developers and architects about the desire, hopes, and the policies and guidelines that are important to residents of the Southdale district and the broader community – which can then be balanced with the owner’s objectives of meeting budget, proforma, and program. Our 4-year-long process with the Work Group focused on creating a framework, a plan, and a set of guidelines and principles that would support the type of experiences the residents and community wanted to see in the District. We articulated characteristics of street rooms by the scale of building walls, defining the qualities of natural light and connection from one street room to the next to enhance the daily experience of people that live in the adjacent Cornelia Neighborhood and potential new residents of the Greater Southdale District. Based on the above factors, we are unable to support this proposal in its current form. We also recommend the applicant re-familiarize themselves with our previous memos evaluating each stage this proposal has gone through. Many of those recommendations appear to still not be understood as we look to the current proposal. Thank you for the opportunity to review. Please let me know if you have any questions. Mic Attachment: Sketch Plan review memo to 70th and France Development Team, dated September 4, 2020 City of Edina – New Construction Sustainability Questionnaire Page 1 City of Edina Sustainable Construction Questionnaire The City of Edina has set ambitious goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the community. To help achieve these goals, developers seeking City approval must complete this form as part of their zoning application. Upon receipt of this form, please email Sustainability Coordinator, Grace Hancock, GHancock@edinamn.gov, to set up a time to walk through the form and discuss sustainable building strategies. Please email the completed form to Cary Teague, CTeague@edinamn.gov, and copy Grace Hancock. Topics Answers Yes or No Brief Description Sustainable Design & Energy Consumption Will you utilize Xcel Energy’s Energy Design Assistance or Energy Efficient Buildings, and/or Centerpoint Energy’s Builder and Developer programs for this development? Yes The project will enroll in the Xcel Energy EDA program. Will the buildings meet SB2030 energy goals? TBD Project is being benchmarked against SB2030 and will strive to achieve the lowest building EUI (energy use intensity) feasible. Will the building be LEED certified? TBD The buildings are being explored to follow ParkSmart, LEED Certified, Well Core, and/or Harvard 9 Foundations of a Healthy Building. Further evaluation is being completed on each block. Will all appliances and equipment be Energy Star or EPA WaterSense certified? Yes Will water heaters be electric or natural gas? Both - Natural Gas and Electric Will building heat be powered by electricity or natural gas? Heat will be a combination of DX rooftop natural gas heat DOAS, natural gas RTUs, electric VRF heat pumps, and electric VAVs depending on the building. Will different strategies to conserve energy (beyond those required by code) be included? If so, please describe Yes Project will utilize LED Lighting, programmable theromostats, VRF HVAC systems, lighting controls in common spaces, building automation system, and energy star equipment and appliances. Continuing to evaluate strategies beyond code. Will there be renewable energy such as solar or wind be generated on site? TBD Exploring having buildings solar ready (electrical infrastructure and roof supports) for future PV installation Will the project include a geothermal system? No Will the completed project subscribe to a community solar program or other renewable energy program? Yes Working with Xcel energy on existing and potential future opportunities to subscribe to renewable programs. Will there be purchase of renewable energy credits (RECs)? TBD Tenant option to purchase at a later date City of Edina – New Construction Sustainability Questionnaire Page 2 City of Edina Sustainable Construction Questionnaire Comments: Managing Storm Water What percent of the property is pervious surface before the redevelopment? What is the percent post development? Existing Site = 260,594 SF 171,882 SF of impervious surface – (24,682 SF of building footprint + 147,200 SF of paving) 66% Impervious 34% Pervious Post Development 182,595 SF of impervious surface (119,945 SF building footprint + 62,650 SF of paving) 70.1% Impervious 29.9% Pervious Net Decrease in Pervious: 4.1% While the impervous surface sf is increasing, there is now storm water management of the full site to accommodate the design. What new surfaces will be pervious? (i.e. Sidewalks, driveways, overflow parking) Pedestrian surfaces will include both standard concrete and colored concrete. The colored concrete is located in select areas to denote major building entrances and boulevard areas. Concrete pavers are planned for a portion of the public plaza on the south side of the residential tower. Pervious areas will include open space along France Avenue as well as a multi- function plaza space within the development. Will a green roof be included on the new structure to assist in storm water retention? Yes Residential tower and Office will have a section of green roof Will rain gardens or similar features be included on site to filter and retain the storm water? TBD Storm water management plan has been approved by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Comments: Landscaping Features to Manage Air Quality and Heat Island Effect Will existing healthy trees be protected and saved? No Due to the location of existing trees, the development of the land will require removal of those trees. City of Edina – New Construction Sustainability Questionnaire Page 3 City of Edina Sustainable Construction Questionnaire What percent of the property is covered by tree canopy before redevelopment? What is the percent post development? For sites A, B, C the Calculations for the tree coverages are as follows. Site A,B,C = 215,705 SF Existing Tree Coverages: Site A,B,C = 26,552 SF (12.3%) Proposed Tree Coverages (75% of full canopy diameter): Site A,B,C = 37,556 SF (17.4%) Will you be replanting/replacing trees at least four to five inches in diameter to positively impact the tree canopy (ordinance requirement is only 2.5 inches in diameter)? Yes, for half the trees in the design. Code requirement for tree planting for Edina has a size ranging from 5.5” to 2.5”. We reflect this on the plans. We will coordinate with the City Forester to ensure he approves all species and sizes. Will shade trees be provided along roadways, drives and surface parking areas beyond those required by code? TBD We provide shade trees along internal roadways and 70th and within the development in the public plaza space. Will native plantings be used in the landscaping? Yes Plants selected for the boulevard areas are species that will tolerate the harsh conditions of their environment. Trees and plants within these areas are salt- tolerant which help to improve their longevity. Several of the tree species selected for the rest of the site are either native to Minnesota or are adapted species of natives that are better suited for their location or condition. Will landscaping include pollinator-friendly varieties? Yes Many of the plants in the stormwater filtration areas along France are pollinator friendly native plants. This environment will not only be a functional part of the stormwater management system but also provide a highly aesthetic landscape with areas for seating and art display. Will future owners and managers be trained in methods to avoid harmful chemicals being used on landscaping? Yes Comments: We have proposed a pocket park/plaza space along the east-west internal street that will be made up of permeable City of Edina – New Construction Sustainability Questionnaire Page 4 City of Edina Sustainable Construction Questionnaire paving for stormwater capture, perimeter planting and tree cover to minimize heat gain. Planting beds with shrubs, perennials and trees will align the perimeter all public sidewalks increasing permeable surface area, providing a shade canopy, and reducing solar heat gain. Seasonal planter pots are planned at building entrances and throughout the streetscape in the district to break up larger hardscape areas and add interest to key focal point and gathering areas. The rooftop terraces and amenity levels will also have a substantial green system of raised planters for trees, shrubs and perennials, and green roof trays in place of hardscape and ballast. A comprehensive landscape planting program will be provided with a water efficient irrigation system to minimize evaporation, manage water use, and monitor moisture levels during dry and wet conditions. Managing Construction Waste Will demolition of existing structures meet LEED Green Building Demolition and/or B3 State of Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines? Yes Will existing building elements be salvaged for reuse? Example, timber, steel, asphalt, cabinets, etc. No Current building has asbestos and will be remediated. Are scrap and excess construction materials being separated and recycled? Yes All construction waste is sent to a recycling facility where the commingled debris is separated by material type to be recycled or sent to a landfill. Mortenson also has a robust 5S program with the expectation of Just- In- Time deliveries with no more than 2-3 days’ worth of material on site at one given time. Are workers provided with separate recycling dumpsters and training in proper use? Yes During First Day, First Hour orientation, Mortenson has a slide discussing the expectations of 5S on the project, including waste management. Workers are provided food dumpsters to keep all organics separate from contaminating building materials being sent to the recycling facility. City of Edina – New Construction Sustainability Questionnaire Page 5 City of Edina Sustainable Construction Questionnaire Comments: Managing Operational Waste Will a recycling service be provided to those in the multifamily complex? To any businesses on site? Yes Will an organic recycling service be provided to those in the multifamily complex? To any businesses on site? Yes Will future users of the building be provided with education and training regarding proper recycling practices? Yes Comments: The site will comply with state and county regulations on waste management. Managing Water Consumption Is the project including features to reduce water consumption beyond features required by code? Yes Low flow fixtures Is there a grey water system included to reuse water on site? Will future users of the building be provided with education and training regarding conservation of water? No/Yes No grey water system. Residents will be educated on how to reduce water usage. Will outdoor landscaping watering system include a water sensor to automatically reduce watering in wet conditions? Yes The irrigation for the site will contain a water sensor and other water saving components to mitigate water usage. Comments: Sustainable Transportation Features Is the site accessible by public transit within ½ mile? Yes Bus stop access is adjacent to project off of 70th. Are site features included to make the use of public transit convenient and simple? Examples include sheltered waiting areas, paved sidewalks and clear site lines. Yes Sidewalks and clear site lines to the bus stop If there is no public transit within ½ mile, is the project providing features to help bridge the distance to allow flexibility to use public transit? N/A Is bike parking available near the main entrance for guests? Space in parking structure (e.g. bike corral, bike lockers) for residents’ bikes? Yes Multiple locations, see slides. Is bike parking and a shower facility provided for employees? Yes The office employees will have access to bike parking and shower facilities Do you have EV Charging Stations for owners, guests or customers to use? Yes Will there be parking spaces provided for car- sharing vehicles to reduce the overall number of cars? Yes Updated January 2021 Memo To: Cary Teague, City of Edina From: Ed Terhaar, P.E. File: 227704479 Date: October 7, 2021 Reference: Traffic and Parking Review for Redevelopment in the Southeast Corner of France Avenue and 70th Street in Edina, MN I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. __________________________________ DATE: October 7, 2021 Edward F. Terhaar License No. 24441 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND This memorandum documents our traffic and parking review for the proposed redevelopment project located in the southeast corner of France Avenue and 70th Street. The project will consist of removing the existing buildings and constructing new buildings containing residential, retail, and office uses as well as a freestanding parking ramp. Access for the project will be provided at the existing right in/right out access on France Avenue, a proposed right in/right out access on 70th Street, and at access points on the south leg of the existing roundabout intersection on 70th Street. For purpose of this review, the current proposed project is assumed to consist of the following uses: • 267 apartment dwelling units • 188,058 square feet of office space • 6,500 square foot bank • 1,500 square foot coffee shop • 6,000 square foot sit-down restaurant • 24,500 square feet of general retail space • A freestanding parking ramp with 540 parking stalls and a 1,300 square foot bicycle facility In addition to the 540-stall parking ramp, Site A includes 444 parking stalls, Site B includes 128 parking stalls, and the bank includes 23 parking stalls. A total of 1,135 parking stalls are included in the project. A full traffic and parking study was completed in October 2020 for a previous proposed development at this location. The current traffic and parking review compares the trip generation and parking demand to the results presented in the previous study. TRAFFIC REVIEW Trip Generation Weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip generation for the proposed development were calculated based on data presented in the tenth edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers Cary Teague City of Edina October 7, 2021 (ITE). The resultant gross trip generation estimates for the previous project as presented in the October 2020 study are shown in Table 1. Table 1 Weekday Gross Trip Generation for Previous Proposed Project as Presented in the October 2020 Study Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Apartments 110 DU 10 30 40 30 18 48 598 Apartments 269 DU 20 63 83 59 38 97 1,197 Office 152,500 SF 152 25 177 28 147 175 1,486 Supermarket 50,300 SF 115 77 192 237 228 465 5,371 Shopping Center 3,300 SF 2 1 3 6 7 13 125 Bank 6,500 SF 36 26 62 66 66 132 650 Coffee Shop 1,500 SF 76 73 149 27 27 54 1,214 Totals 411 295 706 453 531 984 10,641 SF=square feet, DU=dwelling units The resultant gross trip generation estimates for the current project are shown in Table 2. Table 2 Weekday Gross Trip Generation for Current Proposed Project Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Apartments 267 DU 25 71 96 71 46 117 1,452 Office 188,058 SF 187 31 218 34 182 216 1,832 Bank 6,500 SF 4 DIL 21 14 35 53 56 109 499 Coffee Shop 1,500 SF 77 75 152 27 27 54 1,231 Sit-down Restaurant 6,000 SF 2 2 4 31 16 47 503 Retail 24,500 SF 14 9 23 44 49 93 925 Totals 326 202 528 260 376 636 6,442 SF=square feet, DU=dwelling units, DIL=drive-in lanes As shown above, the current proposed project generates fewer trips during all time periods. The trip comparison between the two projects is shown in Table 3. Table 3 Weekday Gross Trip Generation Comparison Land Use Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Previous Project 411 295 706 453 531 984 10,641 Current Project 326 202 528 260 376 636 6,442 Total Difference -85 -93 -178 -193 -155 -348 -4,199 Percentage decrease (20.7%) (31.5%) (25.2%) (42.6%) (29.2%) (35.4%) (39.5%) Cary Teague City of Edina October 7, 2021 Traffic Operations As shown above, the current project generates 25.2% fewer trips during the a.m. peak hour, 35.4% fewer during the p.m. peak hour, and 39.5% fewer on a daily basis. Due to the reduction in the number of trips generated, the current project will have less impact on traffic operations than reported in the October 2020 study. As shown in the site plan, the project includes the construction of a dedicated right turn lane at the existing right in/right out access on France Avenue and at the proposed right in/right out access on 70th Street. Both of these right turn lanes will be necessary to accommodate the proposed traffic volumes using the access points. The need to convert the eastbound 70th Street approach at France Avenue to a left turn lane, through lane, and though/right turn lane was described in the original report. If necessary in the future, the proposed eastbound right turn lane at the proposed right in/right out access would allow for the second eastbound through lane on 70th Street west of France. Since this lane would drop at the proposed right in/right out, through vehicles would need to exit the lane as described in the report. The original study also recommended the construction of a northbound right turn lane on France Avenue at 70th Street. Based on the expected trip generation reductions, the right turn lane will not be needed in the short-term to accommodate the proposed project. It may be needed in the future should areawide traffic volume increases occur in the France Avenue corridor. PARKING REVIEW The project includes a total of 1,135 parking stalls, with 540 in the freestanding parking ramp, 444 in Site A, 128 in Site B, and 23 on the bank site. In addition, the site plan shows the bank building will have 23 surface stalls for customer and employee use. The proposed amount of parking was compared to industry standards to determine adequacy. Parking data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) was used to determine the expected parking demand for the proposed land uses. Data provided in the ITE publication Parking Generation, 5th Edition, indicates the various proposed uses peak at different times during the day. The ITE data was adjusted to account for the expected modal split for the site. The results are shown in Table 4. Based on the ITE data, the peak weekday parking demand for the overall site is 695 spaces, which occurs between 11 a.m. and 2 p.m. The total of 1,135 spaces provided is 440 spaces more than the peak demand. The proposed number of parking stalls adequately accommodates the peak parking demand. The current Edina City code requires 780 parking spaces for the retail and office uses and 267 parking spaces for the apartment units, for a total requirement of 1,047 spaces. The total of 1,135 spaces provided is 88 spaces more than the City code requirement. The proposed number of parking stalls adequately accommodates the City code requirement. TABLE 4 WEEKDAY PARKING DEMAND Adjustment Month of Factor for Year Time of Day Factor Net Parking Needs by Time of Day Gross Walking, Transit Adjust. Land Parking Multi-Purpose, Factor 6 am- 8 am- 11 am- 2 pm- 4 pm- 6 pm- 6 am- 8 am- 11 am- 2 pm- 4 pm- 6 pm- Use Size Unit Rate and Vacancies (MAX) 8 am 11 am 2 pm 4 pm 6 pm 9 pm 8 am 11 am 2 pm 4 pm 6 pm 9 pm Apartment 267 dwell. unit 1.31/unit 10% 100% 100% 60% 50% 50% 60% 75% 315 189 157 157 189 236 Restaurant - 6000 sq. ft.10.52/1000 10% 100% 5% 10% 100% 50% 70% 100% 3 6 57 28 40 57 Office 188058 sq. ft. 2.39/1000 10% 100% 50% 100% 100% 90% 50% 10% 202 405 405 364 202 40 Bank 6500 sq. ft. 3.72/1000 10% 100% 25% 80% 100% 90% 75% 10% 5 17 22 20 16 2 Coffee shop 1500 sq. ft.10.49/1000 10% 100% 100% 100% 75% 75% 75% 10% 14 14 11 11 11 1 Retail 24500 sq. ft. 1.95/1000 10% 100% 25% 75% 100% 90% 75% 90% 11 32 43 39 32 39 Note: Gross parking rates from ITE Parking Generation, 5th edition TOTAL PARKING DEMAND 550 663 695 619 490 375 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ................................................................................ 1 ..................................................................... 3 ...................................................................... 5 ..................................................................... 10 ........................................ 28 ......................................................................................... 30 ................................................................................... 3 .................................................................................. 6 .............................................................................. 7 .......................................................................... 11 .......................................... 12 .......................................... 12 . 13 . 14 ................ 15 ................ 15 .................................. 18 .. 19 ................................ 20 ................................. 20 ............................... 21 ...................................................................... 23 ................................................................... 24 • • • • • • Congested: volume/capacity of 1.0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 70th St W of France Ave 70th St btwn France Ave and York Ave 70th St E of York Ave France Avenue York Ave N of Hazelton Rd York Ave S of Hazelton Rd Hazelton Road btwn France Ave and York AveVolume to Capacity RatioExisting 2025 No-Build 2025 Build 2040 No-Build 2040 Build 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 France Ave/70th Street York Ave/70th St York Ave/Hazelton Rd France Ave/Hazelton RdAverage Delay (seconds)Existing 2025 No-Build 2025 Build 2040 No-Build 2040 Build LOS E = 55s LOS C = 20s 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 France Ave/70th Street York Ave/70th St York Ave/Hazelton Rd France Ave/Hazelton RdAverage Delay (seconds)Existing 2025 No-Build 2025 Build 2040 No-Build 2040 Build LOS E = 55s LOS C = 20s 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 70th St/RAB Access 70th St/ Promenade RAB 70th St/Target RAM Hazelton Rd/RABAverage Delay (seconds)Existing 2025 No-Build 2025 Build 2040 No-Build 2040 Build LOS E = 35s LOS C = 15s 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 70th St/RAB Access 70th St/ Promenade RAB 70th St/Target RAM Hazelton Rd/RABAverage Delay (seconds)Existing 2025 No-Build 2025 Build 2040 No-Build 2040 Build LOS E = 35s LOS C = 15s 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 70th St/Future RIRO Access France Ave/RIRO Access95th Percentile Queues (vehicles)Existing 2025 No-Build 2025 Build 2040 No-Build 2040 Build Queue = 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 70th St/Future RIRO Access France Ave/RIRO Access95th Percentile Queues (vehicles)Existing 2025 No-Build 2025 Build 2040 No-Build 2040 Build Queue = 5 • • • • • • • • • 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 France Ave/70th StreetAverage Delay (seconds)2025 Build 2040 Build 2040 Mitigated LOS E = 55s LOS C = 20s 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 France Ave/70th StreetAverage Delay (seconds)2025 Build_COVID 2040 Build_COVID LOS E = 55s LOS C = 20s 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 France Ave/70th StreetAverage Delay (seconds)2040 Mitigated Build w/ RIRO 2040 Mitigated Build w/out RIRO LOS E = 55s LOS C = 20s 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 70th St/RAB AccessAverage Delay (seconds)2040 Mitigated w/ RIRO 2040 Mitigated w/out RIRO LOS E = 35s LOS C = 15s • • • • • • 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 70th St/Future RIRO Access95th Percentile Queues (vehicles)2040 Mitigated w/ RIRO 2040 Mitigated w/out RIRO Queue = 5 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑒 𝑆𝑜𝑎𝑎𝑒𝑟=𝐹𝐹𝐴 (0.0005 × 𝐹𝐹𝐴)+190 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 3KEY NOTE SYMBOLPARTITION TYPE SYMBOLDETAIL NUMBERINGSECTION REFERENCEELEVATION REFERENCETYPEPARTITIONPARTITIONSHEET NO.DETAIL NO.SHEET NO.SHEET NO.DETAIL NO.1A10.1TITLE1/2" = 1'-0"1A3.11A3.1A9.112341A4.3SECTIONPLANEXTERIOR ELEVATIONIDENTIFICATION NUMBER REFERS TO KEY NOTE LIST NOTE: KEY NOTES DIFFER FROM SHEET TO SHEETSCALE OF DETAIL UNLESS TYPICAL AND INDICATED IN TITLE BLOCKSEQUENTIAL NUMBER FOR LARGE DRAWINGSWHICH DESCRIBES THE DETAILSEQUENTIAL NUMBERING OF ELEVATION SHEETMOUNTING HEIGHTS DIAGRAM (ACCESSORIES)C3142XX'-X"T.O. XXXEL = XX'-X"ELEVATION REFSPOT ELEVATION REFXREVISION NUMBERFIRE EXTINGUISHERCABINETFIRE EXTINGUISHER -WALL MOUNTEDMISCELLANEOUS SYMBOLSELEVATION SYMBOLSSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense #DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota10/16/2020 6:55:06 PMT1.1TITLE SHEET220535ESG ESG70th & France70th & FranceEdina, MNPRELIMDEVELOPMENTPLAN SUBMITTAL10/16/2020PROJECT TEAMDRAWING INDEX70th & FranceEdina, MN 55435Site LocationDRAWING INDEXDRAWINGNUMBERDRAWING NAME10/16/2020ARCHITECTURALT1.1 TITLE SHEET●T2.0 UNIT MIX AND SQUARE FOOTAGES●CIVILC100EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN●C101PRELIMINARY PLAT●C200SITE PLAN (EXISTING)●C300GRADING PLAN●C400SANITARY AND WATERMAIN PLAN●C401STORM SEWER PLAN●C500CITY DETAILS●C501DETAILS●LANDSCAPEL1.0LANDSCAPE PLAN●L1.1LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN●L1.2STREET INTERSECTION VIGNETTES●L2.0LANDSCAPE DETAILS●ARCHITECTURALA0.1EXISTING SITE IMAGES●A0.2SITE PLAN●A0.40EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - SITE●A0.41EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - SITE●ARCHITECTURAL SITE AA0.20-ASITE A FLOOR PLANS●A0.21-ASITE A FLOOR PLANS●A0.30-ASITE A ELEVATIONS●A0.31-ASITE A ELEVATIONS●A0.40-ASITE A EXTERIOR MATERIALS●ARCHITECTURAL SITE BA0.20-BSITE B FLOOR PLANS●A0.21-BSITE B FLOOR PLANS●A0.22-BSITE B FLOOR PLANS●A0.23-BSITE B FLOOR PLANS●A0.30-BSITE B ELEVATIONS●A0.31-BSITE B ELEVATIONS●A0.32-BSITE B ELEVATIONS●A0.33-BSITE B ELEVATIONS●A0.40-BSITE B EXTERIOR MATERIALS●ARCHITECTURAL SITE CA0.20-CSITE C FLOOR PLANS●A0.30-CSITE C ELEVATIONS●A0.40-CSITE C EXTERIOR MATERIALS●ARCHITECTURAL SITE DA0.10-DSITE D SITE PLAN AND FLOOR PLAN●A0.20-DSITE D EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS●A0.30-DSITE D EXTERIOR MATERIALS●OWNER/DEVELOPER:Orion Investments4530 West 77th Street, Suite 365Edina, MN 55435Ph: 612-812-7788ARCHITECT:Elness Swenson Graham Architects, Inc.500 Washington Ave. South, Suite 1080Minneapolis, MN 55415Ph: 612-339-5508Fx: 612-339-5382CONTRACTOR:Mortenson Construction700 Meadow Lane NorthMinneapolis, MN 55422Ph: 763-522-2100CIVIL ENGINEER:Westwood Engineering12701 Whitewater Dr #300 Minnetonka, MN 55343Ph: 952-937-5150LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:Confluence530 N 3rd Street, Suite 120Minneapolis, MN 55401Ph: 612-333-3702STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:T.B.D.MECHANICAL ENGINEER:T.B.D.PLUMBING ENGINEER:T.B.D.ELECTRICAL ENGINEER:T.B.D.SYMBOLS LEGENDFRANCE AVE70THNo. DescriptionDatePROJECT LOCATIONVicinityPROJECT LOCATION SignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota10/16/2020 5:47:36 PMT2.0UNIT MIX AND SQUAREFOOTAGES220535Author Checker10/12/2070th & France70th & FranceEdina, MNPRELIMDEVELOPMENTPLAN SUBMITTAL10/16/2020No. DescriptionDate AIR CONDITIONERGAS METERFIRST FLOOR ELEVATIONFFEHANDICAP PARKINGASH TREEBIRCH TREEFRUIT TREEASHSANITARY SEWERPOSTSIGNLANDSCAPE LIGHTLIGHT POSTVALVEELECTRICAL BOXSTORM SEWERBRCFRTLCHSPCLOCUST TREECOLORADO SPRUCE TREESPNNORWAY SPRUCE TREEGAS UNDERGROUNDFIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUNDTELEPHONE UNDERGROUNDWATERMAINWOOD FENCEPOWER UNDERGROUNDCABLE TV UNDERGROUNDOAKOAK TREECRABAPPLE TREECRBMULTIMULTIPLE TRUNKELECTRICAL MANHOLETRAFFIC SIGNALTRAFFIC BOXCONCRETE SURFACEBITUMINOUS SURFACECATCH BASINSTORM MANHOLESANITARY MANHOLEHAND HOLECABLE TV BOXTELEPHONE BOXFIRE HYDRANT1. This survey was prepared using First American Title Commitment Number NCS-1026991-MPLS having an effective date of August 11, 2020 at 7:30 a.m.2. The address of the surveyed property is 7001 France Avenue S., Edina, Minnesota. (Table A Item 2)3. Subject property appears to be classified as Zone X when scaled from Flood Insurance Rate Map Community - Panel Number 27163C0340E dated 02/03/2010. (Table A Item 3)4. Subject property contains 260,594 Sq.Ft. or 5.982 acres. (Table A Item 4)5. No Zoning information provided by the title company. (Table A Item 6 (a))6. Subject property contains 199 regular parking stalls, 6 handicapped stalls and 0 motorcycle stalls. (Table A Item 9)7. The underground utilities shown have been located from field survey information and existing drawings. The surveyor makes no guarantees that the underground utilities showncomprise all such utilities in the area, either in service or abandoned. The surveyor further does not warrant that that the underground utilities shown are in the exact location indicatedalthough he does certify that they are located as accurately as possible from information available. The surveyor has not physically located the underground utilities. (State One CallTicket Nos. 202531763 & 202531764). (Table A Item 11)8. As of the date the field work was completed for this survey, there was no observable evidence of current earth moving work, exterior building construction or building additions. (Table AItem 16)9. As of the date of this survey, there are no proposed changes in street right of way lines, based on a conversation with the proper official with the City of Edina. Hennepin County has notresponded at the time of this survey. As of the date the field work was completed for this survey, there was no observable evidence of recent street or sidewalk construction or repairs.(Table A Item 17)10. The surveyor did not locate any wetland delineation markers observed in the process of conducting the fieldwork. No markers were observed. (Table A Item 18)11. Based on the information contained within title commitment listed above and a physical inspection of the subject property, the surveyor is not aware of any off site easements orservitudes other than shown hereon. (Table A Item 19)12. Bearings based on the Hennepin County coordinate system, (NAD 83 - 1986 Adjustment).Lot 1, Block 1, except that part thereof which lies Northwesterly of a line drawn from a point on the North line of Section 32, Township 28, Range 24 distant 110 feet Easterly of theNorthwest corner of said section to a point on the West line thereof distant 110 feet Southerly of said Northwest corner; Lot 2, Block 1, except the Easterly 70 feet thereof; Yorktown,Hennepin County, Minnesota.(Torrens Property: Certificate of Title No. 1077413)GENERAL NOTESLEGAL DESCRIPTIONTo: Mortenson Development, Inc., Orion Investments, US Bank National Association and First AmericanTitle Insurance Company:This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance withthe 2016 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly establishedand adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 6(b), 7(a), 7(b)(1), 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 16-19 ofTable A thereof. The fieldwork was completed on September 16, 2020.Date of Plat or Map: 09/22/2020            Nathan H. CarlsonMinnesota License No. 45873nate.carlson@westwoodps.com SCHEDULE B II TITLE ITEM NOTESSURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATEThe following notes correspond to the numbering system of Schedule B II of the above mentioned title commitment. Items 1-10, 13 & 19-22 are not survey matters.11. Easements for utility and sanitary sewer purposes shown and dedicated in the plat of Yorktown recorded June 8, 1972 as Document No. 1033725, and recited on the certificate of title.Said easement for utility and sanitary sewer purposes affects the subject property and is depicted hereon.12. Easement for telecommunications purposes, together with any incidental rights, in favor of Northwestern Bell Telephone Company, an Iowa corporation, as granted and described in theEasement dated November 10, 1970, recorded November 19, 1970 as Document No. 983149. Said easement for telecommunications purposes affects the subject property and isdepicted hereon.14. Easement for scenic and open space purposes, together with any incidental rights, in favor of the Village (now City) of Edina, Minnesota, as granted and described in the Grant ofEasement dated May 3, 1972, recorded June 8, 1972 as Document No. 1033728. Said easement for scenic and open space purposes affects the subject property and is depictedhereon.15. Public right of way for France Avenue South (also known as County Road No. 17) as currently established and maintained, including but not limited to the following:(a) Easement for Public Road Purposes dated July 5, 1972, recorded July 6, 1972 as Document No. 1036934; and(b) Permanent easement for highway purposes as described in the Final Certificate dated July 19, 1991, recorded July 22, 1991 as Document No. 2189613.Said easement for public right of way purposes affects the subject property and is depicted hereon.16. Public right of way for 70th Street West as currently established and maintained, including but not limited to the following:(a) Street right of way dedicated in the plat of Yorktown recorded June 8, 1972 as Document No. 1033725;(b) Permanent easement for highway purposes as described in the Final Certificate dated July 19, 1991, recorded July 22, 1991 as Document No. 2189613; and(c) Grant of Permanent Easement dated April 19, 2011, recorded May 26, 2011 as Document No. T4859947.Said easement for public right of way purposes affects the subject property and is depicted hereon.17. Easement for public sidewalk and utility purposes, together with any incidental rights, in favor of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as granted and described in the Grant of Permanent andTemporary Easements dated March 30, 2013, recorded April 15, 2013 as Document No. T05067233, and as affected by the Amendment to Grant of Permanent and TemporaryEasements dated October 17, 2013, recorded November 13, 2013 as Document No. T05132844. Said easement for public sidewalk and utility purposes affects the subjectproperty and is depicted hereon. Temporary easements have expired.18. The following recital will remain on the certificate of title, and all subsequent certificates of title issued for this land, until an Examiner’s Directive is obtained and recorded authorizingthe Registrar of Titles to remove the recital:“Subject to the transmission line easement and incidental rights connected therewith of Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, as contained in the Stipulation filedin Torrens Case No. 11922; now over the North 25 feet of West 70th Street as dedicated in the plat of Yorktown adjoining the above land.” Said easement for transmission linepurposes does not affect the subject property and is not depicted hereon.Phone(952) 937-515012701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 FOR EASEMENT DETAIL FFEASHBRCFRTLCHSPCSPNOAKCRBMULTIBITUMINOUS SURFACECONCRETE SURFACEMULTIPLE TRUNKCRABAPPLE TREEOAK TREECABLE TV UNDERGROUNDPOWER UNDERGROUNDWOOD FENCEWATERMAINTELEPHONE UNDERGROUNDFIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUNDGAS UNDERGROUNDNORWAY SPRUCE TREECOLORADO SPRUCE TREELOCUST TREESTORM SEWERSANITARY SEWERFRUIT TREEBIRCH TREEASH TREEFIRE HYDRANTTELEPHONE BOXCABLE TV BOXHAND HOLESANITARY MANHOLESTORM MANHOLECATCH BASINTRAFFIC BOXTRAFFIC SIGNALELECTRICAL MANHOLEELECTRICAL BOXVALVELIGHT POSTLANDSCAPE LIGHTSIGNPOSTHANDICAP PARKINGFIRST FLOOR ELEVATIONGAS METERAIR CONDITIONEREASEMENT DETAILPhone(952) 937-515012701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150 GASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGAS GAS GAS PUG PUG PUGPUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUGFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FO FO FOFOFO FO FOPUGPUGPUGPUGW A T W A T WAT PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUGPUGPUGPUGPUGGAS GAS GASGASGASCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUG PUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FOFOFOFOTUG TUGPUGPUG P U GPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUG PUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVXXXGAS GAS GAS FO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO PUGPUGPUGXXX PUG PUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGCANOPYFFE=872.10FFE=860.05FFE=870.03CANOPYLANDSCAPEEDGE STEPS W/HANDRAILMONUMENTSIGNFFE=860.44BRICKRETAINING WALL CONCRETE RETAINING WALLSTONERETAININGWALL72.711.3 12.022.0 6.140.0 6.097.7 6.33.0 100.13.5 16.23.5 5.925.3 2.116.0 22.424.0 22.432.0 2.013.7131.63.116.35.372.065.844.326.366.656.227.34.68.611.38.68.34.527.2 8.3 EXISTING BRICKBUILDING7001 France Avenue,Edina, MinnesotaBuilding Footprint=24,682 Sq. Ft.STORM GRATEWOOD STEPSFND.TPOSTBLDG. HT.=29.4 FT.TRASHENCLOSURESTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STO STO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STOSAN STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSTOSANSANSANSANSAN EXISTING BUILDINGTRASHENCLOSURE STOSANSTO STO WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATISLANDSPED RAMPPEDRAMPPED RAMPBENCHBITUMINOUS SURFACE 70.00WEST 70TH STREETFRANCE AVENUE SOUTH COUNTY ROAD NO. 17 110N. LINE OF SEC. 32, TWP. 28, RGE. 24NW CORNER OF SEC. 32,TWP. 28, RGE. 24110W. LINE OF SEC. 32, TWP. 28, RGE. 24 70.008882010 2010 UTILITY EASEMENT PER THE PLATOF YORKTOWN DOC. NO.1033725 (ITEM NO. 11)22822TELECOMMUNICATIONS EASEMENTPER DOC. NO. 983149 (ITEM NO. 12)SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTPER DOC. NO. (ITEM NO. 11)152020.0015SCENIC AND OPEN SPACE EASEMENT INFAVOR OF EDINA VILLAGE (NOW CITY)PER DOC. NO. 1033728 (ITEM NO. 14)SCENIC AND OPEN SPACE EASEMENT INFAVOR OF EDINA VILLAGE (NOW CITY) PERDOC. NO. 1033728 (ITEM NO. 14)1010PUBLIC ROAD EASEMENT IN PER DOC.NO. 1036934 (ITEM NO. 15)STREET RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED IN THE PLAT OFYORKTOWN DOC. NO. 1033725 (ITEM NO. 16)40 40 HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO.2189613 (ITEM NOS. 15 & 16)HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC.NO. 2189613 (ITEM NOS. 15 & 16)PUBLIC STREET, DRAINAGE & UTILITYEASEMENT PER DOC. NO. T4859947(ITEM NO. 16)SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT PERDOC. NOS. T05067233 &T05132844(ITEM NO. 17)SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENTPER DOC. NOS. T05067233 &T05132844 (ITEM NO. 17)TELECOMMUNICATIONSEASEMENT PER DOC. NO.983149 (ITEM NO. 12)11 SPACES 2 HANDICAPSPACES 10 SPACES 23 SPACES 23 SPACES 21 SPACES 22 SPACES 16 SPACES 18 SPACES 9 SPACES 4 HANDICAPSPACES 2SPACES 5SPACES 12 SPACES 12 SPACES 15 SPACESBACK OF CURB IS 0.4 S.OF PROPERTY LINEBACK OF CURB IS0.1 S. AND 0.7 E.OF PROPERTY LINEBACK OF CURB IS 0.8 E. OFPROPERTY LINE BACK OF CURB ONPROPERTY LINE 100.9583.42 BACK OF CURB IS 2.9SE OF PROPERTY LINEBACK OF CURB 0.2 E. OFPROPERTY LINE N89°50'44"E 505.00S00°11'54"E 496.57S89°48'06"W 524.96N00°12'08"W 476.97 28.27N44°49'18"E EEEEEEEEEEEACACMGGGGTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTTVTVHHTTVAULT-SUMP PUMPLIFT STATION(LOCKED)TTRIM=857.7INV(NE)=856.6INV(S)=856.5STOSTOSTOSTORIM=871.0FULL OF DEBRISRIM=870.6INV(E)=866.4INV(NE)-866.3RIM=871.6INV(E)=865.1INV(W)=864.9INV(S)=866.1RIM=869.1INV(E)=864.5RIM=868.3INV(N/E)=864.3INV(W)=863.6RIM=866.7INV(N)=862.7INV(S)=863.0INV(E/W)=862.6RIM=866.5INV(N)=862.6INV(E)=862.5INV(W)=861.7RIM=871.5INV(E)=867.215" RCPRIM=867.5INV=863.2RIM=857.1INV=856.6RIM=857.2INV=856.7RIM=868.4INV=857.9RIM = 862.97IE = 855.15 (CITY AS-BUILT)RIM=859.4INV=856.7SGREY WATERRIM=864.3INV=857.8RIM=860.0INV=858.1RIM=866.8INV(E)=859.4INV(W)=859.1RIM=862.9INV=860.112" RCPRIM=862.8INV(NE)=859.0INV(E/S)=857.5RIM=862.8INV(N)=857.2INV(E)=859.2INV(SE)=857.5INV(SW)=856.3RIM=866.3INV=859.6RIM=865.4INV=860.1RIM=865.9INV=860.5RIM=864.9INV=860.3RIM=866.2INV=863.3RIM=869.5FULL OFWATERRIM=871.1INV=868.015" CLAYRIM=863.4FULL OF ICE& DEBRISRIM=863.1INV(NE)=859.6INV(W)=859.1RIM=861.2INV=858.112" RCPRIM=861.8INV(E)=857.7INV(W)=858.2INV(S)=857.6RIM=862.1INV=857.912" RCPRIM=871.2INV=865.4RIM=871.1INV(N)=864.2INV(SW)=864.1RIM=871.3INV=861.6RIM=870.6INV=860.3RIM=862.5INV(N)=852.8INV(S)=852.6RIM=868.6INV(N)=858.4INV(W)=858.2SSANS15" RCP21" RCPS15" RCP 12" RCP21" RCP12" RCP21" RCP9" CLAY @ 0.8%24" RCP24" RCP24" RCP12" RCP15" CONC15" RCP12" RCP 15" RCP8"PVC 8" CLAY8" CAST IRON12" CLAY 8" CLAY10" CLAY 8" CLAY10" CLAY12"RCP ST-5ST-6ST-4ST-3ST-2ST-116" ASH13" LCH14" SPNDEAD16" LCH14" SPN12" SPN18" SPN14" LCH18" SPN14" ASH14" SPN2" ASH16" SPN14" SPN14" SPN10" ASH10" ASH8" ASH14" ASH14" ASH20" ASH13" ASH17" ASH10" ASH13" ASH15" LCH12" ASH9" ASH12" ASH10" ASH15" ASH12" ASH 10" ASH15" ASH8" ASH8" ASH12" ASH15" ASH12" ASH7" ASH8" ASH12" ASH 6" ASH14" ASH4" SPC4" SPC5" SPC5" SPCMULTI-BIRCHMULTI-BIRCHMULTI-BIRCHMULTI-BIRCHMULTI-CRB MULTI-CRB27" ASH2" OAK 15" LCH14" SPN10" SPN12" SPN10" SPN18" SPN16" SPN16" SPN12" LCH14" LCH14" LCH16" LCH20" LCH18" FRT4" ASH4" ASH4" ASH12" ASH 12" ASH 12" ASH 12" ASH GW: 853.0GW: 853.5GW: 858.0GW: 848.6GW: NOT OBSERVEDGW: NOT OBSERVEDXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\ \\\\\\\\\************************XXXXXX\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\X\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \\\ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\ \\ \\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\222222222\\\\\\\\\\\\233144444444455666666666666666778444SHEET NUMBER:DATE:DATE:LICENSE NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA VERTICAL SCALE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: DRAWN: CHECKED: DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:PREPARED FOR: Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 N:\0029211.10\DWG\CIVIL\0029211.10RM01.DWG EDINA, MN10/16/2070TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTEXISTING CONDITIONSAND REMOVALS PLAN 70TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTC100 .10/16/20DAVID T. BADE . . . 10/16/20 4530 WEST 77TH STREET SUITE #365EDINA, MN 55435 ORION/MORTENSON © 2020 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com### ### or ## . . . . . . . . . .PROJECT NUMBER: 0029211.10PROPERTY LINE\\\\\\CURB & GUTTERSAW CUT PAVEMENTSANSANITARY SEWERWATWATER MAINSTOSTORM SEWERCONCRETEBITUMINOUSBUILDINGTREELIGHT POLETRAFFIC SIGNEXISTINGPROPOSEDSANWATSTOCONSTRUCTION BARRICADEWATHYDRANTWATGASGASGASPUGUNDERGROUND ELECTRICPUGTUGUNDERGROUND TELEPHONETUGPOHOVERHEAD ELECTRICPOHTOHOVERHEAD TELEPHONETOHFOTELEPHONE FIBER OPTICFOCTVCABLE TELEVISIONCTVRETAINING WALLFENCEXSOIL BORING LOCATIONSB-19TREE LINEXEXISTINGREMOVALS\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\REMOVAL LEGEND1. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THISPLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITYLOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIEDIMMEDIATELY IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE LIMITS OF REMOVALS WITH PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTSAND FIELD VERIFY CONDITION OF EXISTING APPURTENANCES TO REMAIN. CONTRACTORSHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING OR REPLACING MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (SUCH ASFENCES, SIGNS, IRRIGATION HEADS, ETC.) THAT MAY BE DAMAGED BY CONSTRUCTION.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE ALL NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES REQUIRED TOMAINTAIN SITE STABILITY PRIOR TO EXECUTING ANY SITE REMOVALS.4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION WITH UTILITY PROVIDERS FORREMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AFFECTED BY SITE DEVELOPMENT. ALLPERMITS, APPLICATIONS AND FEES ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.REMOVAL NOTESSSX*XXXNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION0'30'60'90'1" = 30'1. SAW CUT LINE2. REMOVE BITUMINOUS3. EXISTING BITUMINOUS TO REMAIN4. REMOVE CONCRETE5. REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING6. REMOVE CURB7. REMOVE RETAINING WALL8. REMOVE MONUMENT SIGNREMOVAL KEYNOTES1TREES TO BE REMOVED: 72TREES TO REMAIN: 4TOTAL TREES: 76TREE REMOVAL QUANTITIES XXXXXX WEST 70TH STREETFRANCE AVENUE SOUTH COUNTY ROAD NO. 17 XXXWEST 70TH STREETFRANCE AVENUE SOUTH COUNTY ROAD NO. 17 XXXXLOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 48882010 2010UTILITY EASEMENT PERTHE PLAT OF YORKTOWNDOC. NO. 103372522822TELECOMMUNICATIONSEASEMENT PER DOC.NO. 983149SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTPER DOC. NO. 1033725 152020 15SCENIC AND OPEN SPACEEASEMENT IN FAVOR OFEDINA VILLAGE (NOW CITY)PER DOC. NO. 1033728SCENIC AND OPEN SPACE EASEMENTIN FAVOR OF EDINA VILLAGE (NOWCITY) PER DOC. NO. 103372810 10PUBLIC ROAD EASEMENTIN PER DOC. NO.1036934 HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 2189613 HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 2189613PUBLIC STREET, DRAINAGE & UTILITYEASEMENT PER DOC. NO. T4859947SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT PERDOC. NOS. T05067233 &T05132844 SIDEWALK & UTILITYEASEMENT PER DOC.NOS. T05067233 &T05132844TELECOMMUNICATIONSEASEMENT PER DOC.NO. 983149N00°00'00"E 333.75 N00°00'00"E 162.98 N90°00'00"E 524.98274.92250.06264.54260.44250.62274.34245.71259.28163.93 313.04 334.45162.12 PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT(BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT)PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT(BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT)PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT(BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT)PROPOSED ROAD EASEMENT(BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT)303028.5 208.5 161628.5 208.5S89°48'06"W 524.96N00°12'08"W 476.97 28.27N44°49'18"E N89°50'44"E 505.00S00°11'54"E 496.57 SHEET NUMBER:DATE:DATE:LICENSE NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA VERTICAL SCALE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: DRAWN: CHECKED: DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:PREPARED FOR: Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 N:\0029211.10\DWG\CIVIL\0029211.10PP01.DWG EDINA, MN10/16/2070TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTPRELIMINARY PLAT 70TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTC101 4587310/16/20Nathan H. Carlson . NHC BJY 10/16/20 4530 WEST 77TH STREET SUITE #365EDINA, MN 55435 ORION/MORTENSONNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION© 2020 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com0'30'60'90'1" = 30'30' 6' or 3' . . . . . . . . . .PROJECT NUMBER: 0029211.10LOT 12.02 AC.LOT AREA(ACRE)LEGALDESCRIPTIONOFFICE/GROCERYPROPOSED USELOT 21.99 AC.MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIALLOT 30.93 AC.SENIOR HOUSINGLOT 41.03 AC.BANKSITE DATA CHARTOrion/Mortenson4530 West 77th St., Ste. 365Edina, MN 55435OWNER / SUBDIVIDERENGINEERWESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES12701 WHITEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 300,MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55343Phone: 952-937-5150ZONINGEXISTING: PCD-3 - PLANNED COMMERCIALPROPOSED: PUD - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTTOTAL5.97 AC. XXXFND.TPOSTWEST 70TH STREETFRANCE AVENUE SOUTH COUNTY ROAD NO. 17 8882010 2010 UTILITY EASEMENT PER THE PLATOF YORKTOWN DOC. NO.1033725 (ITEM NO. 11)22822TELECOMMUNICATIONS EASEMENTPER DOC. NO. 983149 (ITEM NO. 12)SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTPER DOC. NO. (ITEM NO. 11)152020.0015SCENIC AND OPEN SPACE EASEMENT INFAVOR OF EDINA VILLAGE (NOW CITY)PER DOC. NO. 1033728 (ITEM NO. 14)SCENIC AND OPEN SPACE EASEMENT INFAVOR OF EDINA VILLAGE (NOW CITY) PERDOC. NO. 1033728 (ITEM NO. 14)1010PUBLIC ROAD EASEMENT IN PER DOC.NO. 1036934 (ITEM NO. 15)STREET RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED IN THE PLAT OFYORKTOWN DOC. NO. 1033725 (ITEM NO. 16)40 40 HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO.2189613 (ITEM NOS. 15 & 16)HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC.NO. 2189613 (ITEM NOS. 15 & 16)PUBLIC STREET, DRAINAGE & UTILITYEASEMENT PER DOC. NO. T4859947(ITEM NO. 16)SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT PERDOC. NOS. T05067233 &T05132844(ITEM NO. 17)SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENTPER DOC. NOS. T05067233 &T05132844 (ITEM NO. 17)TELECOMMUNICATIONSEASEMENT PER DOC. NO.983149 (ITEM NO. 12)ST-5ST-6ST-4ST-3ST-2ST-116" ASH13" LCH14" ASH10" ASH15" LCH12" ASH GW: 853.0GW: 853.5GW: 858.0GW: 848.6GW: NOT OBSERVEDGW: NOT OBSERVEDCOMMERCIAL/GROCERY/RETAIL SPACEFOOTPRINT = 51,600 SFFFE = 868.00MULTI-FAMILY HOUSINGFOOTPRINT = 44,300 SFFFE = 870.75SENIOR HOUSINGFOOTPRINT = 21,050 SFFFE = 866.255,642 SFELEVATORLOBBYOFFICE LOBBY3,473 SFCOFFEE RETAIL1,341 SFXXXXBANK DEVELOPMENTLOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 410'8.5' (TYP.)24'24'24'24'8.5' (TYP.)25.5'26'8.5'13.33'8.5'13.33'9'8.5'R10'R10'R15'R15'R45'R10'R30'R20'24'R200'R224'R146'R123'R40'R15'R15'24'26'8.5'13.33'8.5'13.33'26'8.5'13.33'8.5'13.33'24'22'24'R100'44.72'38.5'174.5'69.7'34.8'29.5'50.0'13.0'34.8'13.9'34.8'12.8'14.4'42.5'AAAABBBCA60'25.5'A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A222555556D1B51B7777888888888888888889A9A9A9A9A11111111111111511111111131313134348488A8A8A9A8A8A8AEBB2121212121219'13'10.9'12.5'12.0'8.7'10.0'8.0'S.1S.4S.1S.4S.1S.1S.4S.2S.1S.4S.4S.4S.1S.4S.2S.3S.4S.1S.4S.4S.1S.4S.1S.3S.3SHEET NUMBER:DATE:DATE:LICENSE NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA VERTICAL SCALE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: DRAWN: CHECKED: DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:PREPARED FOR: Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 N:\0029211.10\DWG\CIVIL\0029211.10SP01.DWG EDINA, MN10/16/2070TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTSITE PLAN 70TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTC200 .10/16/20DAVID T. BADE . . . 10/16/20 4530 WEST 77TH STREET SUITE #365EDINA, MN 55435 ORION/MORTENSONNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION© 2020 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com0'30'60'90'1" = 30'30' 6' or 3' . . . . . . . . . .PROJECT NUMBER: 0029211.10S.1S.10S.2S.3REFERENCESTOP SIGNS.4NO TRUCKSRIGHT LANE MUST TURN RIGHTPEDESTRIAN CROSSING1A B612 CURB AND GUTTER1B B618 CURB AND GUTTER2 SURMOUNTABLE CURB AND GUTTER5 VALLEY GUTTER6 CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER7 ENTRANCE THRU CURB AND GUTTER8 PRIVATE CONCRETE SIDEWALK8A PUBLIC CONCRETE SIDEWALK9 PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP9A PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP11 CROSS WALK STRIPING13 TRAFFIC ARROW14 SIGN INSTALLATION19 PAVEMENT SECTIONS21 HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE SECTION22 SAW CUT CONTROL JOINT24 CONCRETE CURB AT SIDEWALK31 TRANSITION CURB (B612)43 RETAINING WALL WITH FENCE USING SLEEVE-IT SYSTEM45 B612 AND SURMOUNTABLE CURB TRANSITION48 CONCRETE STAIR AND RAILING DETAIL1·EXISTING ZONING:PDC-3, PLANNED COMMERCIAL·PROPOSED ZONING:PUD - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT·PARCEL DESCRIPTION:LOT 1, BLOCK 1, YORKTOWN, HENNEPINCOUNTY, MINNESOTA·PROPERTY AREA:260,594 SF (5.98 AC)·PERVIOUS SURFACE:71,861 SF (27.6%)·IMPERVIOUS SURFACE(RATIO):188,733 SF (72.4%)·FLOOR-AREA-RATIO(FAR):SEE ARCH PLANS·BUILDING SETBACK PER CODE:XX'=FRONTXX'=SIDE / XX'=SIDE TO ROWXX'=REARLOT 1BLDG FOOTPRINTAREA(SF)LOT AREA(ACRE)LEGALDESCRIPTION51,600PROPOSED USELOT 2LOT 3LOT 4TOTAL5.98 AC.123,050-44,30021,0506,100SIGN LEGENDSITE DETAILS (SI-0XX)SITE DEVELOPMENT SUMMARYSITE DATA CHART1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR THIS PROJECT PROVIDED BY WESTWOOD PROFESSIONALSERVICES, MINNETONKA, MN, 2020.2. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THISPLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITYLOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND, THEENGINEER SHOULD BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY.3. REFER TO BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR LOT BEARINGS, DIMENSIONS AND AREAS.4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB OR EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.5. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OFEXITS, RAMPS, AND TRUCK DOCKS.6. ALL CURB RADII ARE SHALL BE 5.0 FEET (TO FACE OF CURB) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. ALL CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFICCONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGGERSAND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OFTHESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY AND ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT.TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS.9. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SECTIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THERECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURINGCONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TOADJACENT PROPERTIES.11. SITE LIGHTING SHOWN ON PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN PREPAREDBY OTHERS FOR SITE LIGHTING DETAILS AND PHOTOMETRICS.GENERAL SITE NOTESPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEEASEMENT LINECURB AND GUTTERLOT LINEPOND NORMAL WATER LEVELRETAINING WALLCONCRETE PAVEMENTNUMBER OF PARKING STALLSTRANSFORMERSITE LIGHTINGEXISTINGPROPOSEDFENCEXXHEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTNORMAL DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTTRAFFIC SIGNPOWER POLEBOLLARD / POSTCONCRETE SIDEWALKTIP-OUT CURB AND GUTTERSITE LEGEND5T 2.02 AC.OFFICE/GROCERY1.99 AC.MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL0.93 AC.SENIOR HOUSING1.03 AC.BANKA. PLANTER CURB (TYP.)B. CONCRETE PAVERS (TYP.)C. GENERATORD. EXISTING SURMOUNTABLE CURB IN ROUNDABOUTE. BIKE LANE EXIT RAMP ONTO SHARED SIDEWALKSITE KEYNOTESX GASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGAS GAS GAS PUG PUG PUGPUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUGFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FO FO FOFOFO FO FOPUGPUGPUGPUG WAT PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUGPUGPUGPUGPUG PUGGAS GAS CTVCTV CTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVFO FO FO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FO FO FO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FOPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FOFOFOFOTUGPUGPUG P U GPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUG PUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVXXXFO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOPUGPUGPUGFND.TPOSTSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STO STOSTO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSANSANSANSANSANSTOSANSTOSTO WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWEST 70TH STREETFRANCE AVENUE SOUTH COUNTY ROAD NO. 17 8882010 2010 UTILITY EASEMENT PER THE PLATOF YORKTOWN DOC. NO.1033725 (ITEM NO. 11)22822TELECOMMUNICATIONS EASEMENTPER DOC. NO. 983149 (ITEM NO. 12)SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTPER DOC. NO. (ITEM NO. 11)152020.0015SCENIC AND OPEN SPACE EASEMENT INFAVOR OF EDINA VILLAGE (NOW CITY)PER DOC. NO. 1033728 (ITEM NO. 14)SCENIC AND OPEN SPACE EASEMENT INFAVOR OF EDINA VILLAGE (NOW CITY) PERDOC. NO. 1033728 (ITEM NO. 14)1010PUBLIC ROAD EASEMENT IN PER DOC.NO. 1036934 (ITEM NO. 15)STREET RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED IN THE PLAT OFYORKTOWN DOC. NO. 1033725 (ITEM NO. 16)40 40 HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO.2189613 (ITEM NOS. 15 & 16)HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC.NO. 2189613 (ITEM NOS. 15 & 16)PUBLIC STREET, DRAINAGE & UTILITYEASEMENT PER DOC. NO. T4859947(ITEM NO. 16)SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT PERDOC. NOS. T05067233 &T05132844(ITEM NO. 17)SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENTPER DOC. NOS. T05067233 &T05132844 (ITEM NO. 17)TELECOMMUNICATIONSEASEMENT PER DOC. NO.983149 (ITEM NO. 12)EEEEEEEEEEMGTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTTVTVHHTTTTSTOSTOSTOSTORIM=871.0FULL OF DEBRISRIM=870.6INV(E)=866.4INV(NE)-866.3RIM=871.6INV(E)=865.1INV(W)=864.9INV(S)=866.1RIM=869.1INV(E)=864.5RIM=868.3INV(N/E)=864.3INV(W)=863.6RIM=866.7INV(N)=862.7INV(S)=863.0INV(E/W)=862.6RIM=866.5INV(N)=862.6INV(E)=862.5INV(W)=861.7RIM=871.5INV(E)=867.215" RCPRIM=867.5INV=863.2RIM = 862.97IE = 855.15 (CITY AS-BUILT)RIM=866.8INV(E)=859.4INV(W)=859.1RIM=862.8INV(N)=857.2INV(E)=859.2INV(SE)=857.5INV(SW)=856.3RIM=866.2INV=863.3RIM=869.5FULL OFWATERRIM=871.1INV=868.0RIM=863.4FULL OF ICE& DEBRISRIM=863.1INV(NE)=859.6INV(W)=859.1RIM=861.2INV=858.112" RCPRIM=861.8INV(E)=857.7INV(W)=858.2INV(S)=857.6RIM=862.1INV=857.912" RCPRIM=862.5INV(N)=852.8INV(S)=852.615" RCP21" RCPS12" RCP21" RCP12" RCP21" RCP9" CLAY @ 0.8%24" RCP24" RCP24" RCP12" RCP 8"PVC 12"RCP ST-5ST-6ST-4ST-3ST-2ST-116" ASH13" LCH14" ASH10" ASH15" LCH12" ASH GW: 853.0GW: 853.5GW: 858.0GW: 848.6GW: NOT OBSERVEDGW: NOT OBSERVEDCOMMERCIAL/GROCERY/RETAIL SPACEFOOTPRINT = 51,600 SFFFE = 868.00MULTI-FAMILY HOUSINGFOOTPRINT = 44,300 SFFFE = 870.75SENIOR HOUSINGFOOTPRINT = 21,050 SFFFE = 866.25XXXX865862863864 866860865859861862863864866867868 869 867868869860865858859859859861862863864865865864864866866867867868868 87 0 8758 6 7 868 86 9 87 1 87 2 87 3 87487087586987187287387 4 870867 868 8698718728738708678688698718 7 0 871 87 086986886 7 867 8688658 6 9 8698 7 1 865 8 6 7 8658688 6 7 866866867869868867 86786886 9 868 869870864864864 871.83869868868869868.00867.50866.75866.50867.25867.50868.75870.75870.75870.50870.00868.00869.80869.30869.30869.30864.50864.00864.00864.00866.25867.60866.90866.25866.75865863864 86786 6 865864 863866 868.00868.00868.00868.00865866866865 SHEET NUMBER:DATE:DATE:LICENSE NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA VERTICAL SCALE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: DRAWN: CHECKED: DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:PREPARED FOR: Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 N:\0029211.10\DWG\CIVIL\0029211.10GD01.DWG EDINA, MN10/16/2070TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTGRADING PLAN 70TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTC300 .10/16/20DAVID T. BADE . . . 10/16/20 4530 WEST 77TH STREET SUITE #365EDINA, MN 55435 ORION/MORTENSON © 2020 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com### ### or ## . . . . . . . . . .PROJECT NUMBER: 0029211.10PROPERTY LINE982980POND NORMAL WATER LEVELRIDGE LINETOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALLEMERGENCY OVERFLOWSB-19SOIL BORING LOCATIONSTOSTORM SEWERDRAIN TILEWATER MAINSANITARY SEWEREXISTINGPROPOSEDINDEX CONTOURINTERVAL CONTOUR982980WATSANSPOT ELEVATIONFLOW DIRECTIONSB-19RETAINING WALLGRADING LIMITSGLCURB AND GUTTERFLARED END SECTION (WITH RIPRAP)GRADING LEGEND1. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THISPLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITYLOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIEDIMMEDIATELY IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND.2. CONTRACTORS SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS ANDDIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULE, SLOPED PAVEMENT, EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISEBUILDING DIMENSIONS, EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS, AND EXACTLOCATIONS AND NUMBER OF DOWNSPOUTS.3. ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARDSPECIFICATIONS FOR TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL/SURFACE RESTORATION" ASPREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA.4. ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE FOUR INCHES OF TOPSOIL AND SOD OR SEED.THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. SEELANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PLANTING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT.5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFICCONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMENAND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OFTHESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFICCONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS.6. ALL SLOPES SHALL BE GRADED TO 3:1 OR FLATTER, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THISSHEET.7. CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING AND PROVIDE ASMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITH UNIFORM SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONSARE SHOWN OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES.8. SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN INDICATE FINISHED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS & GUTTER FLOWLINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACEGRADE.9. SEE SOILS REPORT FOR PAVEMENT THICKNESSES AND HOLD DOWNS.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ANY EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL THAT EXISTS AFTER THE SITEGRADING AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OFALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL IN A MANNER ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER AND THE REGULATINGAGENCIES.11. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL RETAINING WALL DESIGN CERTIFIED BY ALICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER.12. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL RULES INCLUDING THENATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.13. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY STRUCTURE OR PAVEMENT, A PROOF ROLL, AT MINIMUM, WILLBE REQUIRED ON THE SUBGRADE. PROOF ROLLING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MAKINGMINIMUM OF 2 COMPLETE PASSES WITH FULLY-LOADED TANDEM-AXLE DUMP TRUCK, ORAPPROVED EQUAL, IN EACH OF 2 PERPENDICULAR DIRECTIONS WHILE UNDER SUPERVISIONAND DIRECTION OF THE INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY. AREAS OF FAILURE SHALL BEEXCAVATED AND RE-COMPACTED AS SPECIFIED HEREIN.14. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL PLACED BENEATH BUILDINGS AND STREET OR PARKING AREAS SHALLBE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFIED DENSITY METHOD AS OUTLINED INMNDOT 2105.3F1 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.15. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL NOT PLACED IN THE BUILDING PAD, STREETS OR PARKING AREA,SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDINARYCOMPACTION METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MNDOT 2105.3F2.16. ALL SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENTGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE ORUNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. THECONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS ANDINSPECTIONS WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.1. BASIN EXCAVATION AND PIPE INSTALLATION MAY TAKE PLACE BEFORE CURB INSTALLATION.ALL OTHER BASIN CONSTRUCTION MUST WAIT UNTIL FINAL SITE LANDSCAPING. REMOVESEDIMENT FROM EXCAVATED BASIN PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF FILTER MEDIA. PLACE SANDBAGS OR SIMILAR ITEM IN CURB CUTS TO PRE-FILTER STORM WATER UNTIL PLANTS AREESTABLISHED IN BASINS. MAINTAIN INLET PROTECTION ON DOWN STREAM INLETS UNTILBASINS ARE ON-LINE.2. BASIN EXCAVATION SHALL BE WITH TOOTHED-BUCKETS TO SCARIFY THE BOTTOM.3. PLACE SILT FENCE AROUND BASINS AS SHOWN IMMEDIATELY AFTER BASIN CONSTRUCTION.4. BASINS MUST BE TESTED FOR INFILTRATION RATE AFTER TOTAL SITE STABILIZATION. A DUALRING INFILTROMETER SHALL BE USED FOR TESTING. MINIMUM INFILTRATION RATE IS 1-INCHPER HOUR. IF BASIN DOES NOT MEET INFILTRATION RATE, CONTRACTOR MUST TAKECORRECTIVE ACTION UNTIL MINIMUM INFILTRATION RATE IS MET. CORRECTIVE ACTION MAYINCLUDE REMOVING PLUG IN DRAIN TILE. ALL TESTING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION SHALL BETHE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR, AND SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONTRACT,WITH NO DIRECT COMPENSATION MADE.GRADING NOTESFILTRATION/INFILTRATION BASIN NOTES0.00%900.00900.00TW=XXX.XXBW=XXX.XXE.O.F.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION0'30'60'90'1" = 30' GASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGAS GAS GAS PUG PUG PUGPUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUGFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FO FO FOFOFO FO FOPUGPUGPUGPUG WAT PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUGPUGPUGPUGPUG PUGGAS GAS CTVCTV CTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVFO FO FO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FO FO FO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FOPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FOFOFOFOTUGPUGPUG P U GPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUG PUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVXXXFO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOPUGPUGPUGFND.TPOSTSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STO STOSTO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSANSANSANSANSANSTOSANSTOSTO WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWEST 70TH STREETFRANCE AVENUE SOUTH COUNTY ROAD NO. 17 8882010 2010 UTILITY EASEMENT PER THE PLATOF YORKTOWN DOC. NO.1033725 (ITEM NO. 11)22822TELECOMMUNICATIONS EASEMENTPER DOC. NO. 983149 (ITEM NO. 12)SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTPER DOC. NO. (ITEM NO. 11)152020.0015SCENIC AND OPEN SPACE EASEMENT INFAVOR OF EDINA VILLAGE (NOW CITY)PER DOC. NO. 1033728 (ITEM NO. 14)SCENIC AND OPEN SPACE EASEMENT INFAVOR OF EDINA VILLAGE (NOW CITY) PERDOC. NO. 1033728 (ITEM NO. 14)1010PUBLIC ROAD EASEMENT IN PER DOC.NO. 1036934 (ITEM NO. 15)STREET RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED IN THE PLAT OFYORKTOWN DOC. NO. 1033725 (ITEM NO. 16)40 40 HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO.2189613 (ITEM NOS. 15 & 16)HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC.NO. 2189613 (ITEM NOS. 15 & 16)PUBLIC STREET, DRAINAGE & UTILITYEASEMENT PER DOC. NO. T4859947(ITEM NO. 16)SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT PERDOC. NOS. T05067233 &T05132844(ITEM NO. 17)SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENTPER DOC. NOS. T05067233 &T05132844 (ITEM NO. 17)TELECOMMUNICATIONSEASEMENT PER DOC. NO.983149 (ITEM NO. 12)EEEEEEEEEEMGTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTTVTVHHTTTTSTOSTOSTOSTORIM=871.0FULL OF DEBRISRIM=870.6INV(E)=866.4INV(NE)-866.3RIM=871.6INV(E)=865.1INV(W)=864.9INV(S)=866.1RIM=869.1INV(E)=864.5RIM=868.3INV(N/E)=864.3INV(W)=863.6RIM=866.7INV(N)=862.7INV(S)=863.0INV(E/W)=862.6RIM=866.5INV(N)=862.6INV(E)=862.5INV(W)=861.7RIM=871.5INV(E)=867.215" RCPRIM=867.5INV=863.2RIM = 862.97IE = 855.15 (CITY AS-BUILT)RIM=866.8INV(E)=859.4INV(W)=859.1RIM=862.8INV(N)=857.2INV(E)=859.2INV(SE)=857.5INV(SW)=856.3RIM=866.2INV=863.3RIM=869.5FULL OFWATERRIM=871.1INV=868.0RIM=863.4FULL OF ICE& DEBRISRIM=863.1INV(NE)=859.6INV(W)=859.1RIM=861.2INV=858.112" RCPRIM=861.8INV(E)=857.7INV(W)=858.2INV(S)=857.6RIM=862.1INV=857.912" RCPRIM=862.5INV(N)=852.8INV(S)=852.615" RCP21" RCPS12" RCP21" RCP12" RCP21" RCP9" CLAY @ 0.8%24" RCP24" RCP24" RCP12" RCP 8"PVC 12"RCP ST-5ST-6ST-4ST-3ST-2ST-116" ASH13" LCH14" ASH10" ASH15" LCH12" ASH GW: 853.0GW: 853.5GW: 858.0GW: 848.6GW: NOT OBSERVEDGW: NOT OBSERVEDCOMMERCIAL/GROCERY/RETAIL SPACEFOOTPRINT = 51,600 SFFFE = 868.00MULTI-FAMILY HOUSINGFOOTPRINT = 44,300 SFFFE = 870.75SENIOR HOUSINGFOOTPRINT = 21,050 SFFFE = 866.255,642 SFELEVATORLOBBYOFFICE LOBBY3,473 SFCOFFEE RETAIL1,341 SFXXXXBANK DEVELOPMENT8" SAN STUBIE=858.788" WM STUB8" SAN STUBIE=857.158" WM STUB8" WM STUB6" SAN STUBIE=856.466" SAN STUBIE=860.278" SAN STUBIE=861.366" WM STUB8" WM STUBHYDRANTHYDRANTHYDRANTHYDRANTHYDRANT6" WM STUB6" SAN STUB119 LF - 10" PVC @ 0.70%SAN MH 11RIM=862.45IE(E)=855.52IE(SW)=855.42CORE DRILL INTOEXISTING SAN MH 10RIM=862.97IE(S,NE)=855.1539 LF - 10" PVC @ 0.70%SAN MH 12RIM=862.90IE(N)=855.96IE(E)=855.96IE(W)=855.8648 LF - 10" PVC @ 0.70%SAN MH 13RIM=864.50IE(N,E)=856.90IE(W)=856.80218 LF - 10" PVC @ 0.70%SAN MH 14RIM=867.00IE(E,S)=858.52IE(W)=858.42SAN MH 15RIM=867.80IE(N)=859.15IE(W)=859.0576 LF - 10" PVC @ 0.70%SAN MH 16RIM=869.10IE(W,N)=859.95IE(S)=859.85100 LF - 10" PVC @ 0.70%171 LF - 8" PVC @ 0.70%SAN MH 16RIM=870.00IE(W)=861.25IE(S)=861.1516 LF - 8" PVC @ 0.70%16 LF - 6" PVC @ 2.00%26 LF - 10" PVC @ 1.00%25 LF - 8" PVC @ 1.00%INSULATE PIPE25 LF - 6" PVC @ 2.00%8" DIP1234567891011121314151617181920AAA8" DIP8" DIP8" DIP8" DIPSHEET NUMBER:DATE:DATE:LICENSE NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA VERTICAL SCALE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: DRAWN: CHECKED: DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:PREPARED FOR: Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 N:\0029211.10\DWG\CIVIL\0029211.10UT01.DWG EDINA, MN10/16/2070TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTSANITARY ANDWATERMAIN PLAN 70TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTC400 .10/16/20DAVID T. BADE . . . 10/16/20 4530 WEST 77TH STREET SUITE #365EDINA, MN 55435 ORION/MORTENSON © 2020 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com### ### or ## . . . . . . . . . .PROJECT NUMBER: 0029211.10SANEXISTINGPROPOSEDSANITARY SEWERSTOSTORM SEWERWATWATER MAINEASEMENT LINEPROPERTY LINEWATHYDRANTGATE VALVEDRAIN TILEFLARED END SECTION (WITH RIPRAP)LIGHT POLEGASGASGASPUGUNDERGROUND ELECTRICPUGTUGUNDERGROUND TELEPHONETOHPOHOVERHEAD ELECTRICPOHTOHOVERHEAD TELEPHONETOHFOTELEPHONE FIBER OPTICFOCTVCABLE TELEVISIONCTVFMFMSANITARY SEWER FORCE MAINCURB AND GUTTERUTILITY LEGEND1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESEPLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THEINFORMATION SHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES.2. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATER MAIN MATERIAL AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE PER CITY REQUIREMENTS, MINNESOTAPLUMBING CODE, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICELINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OFMINNESOTA.3. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE NECESSARY FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS FOR THE PROPOSEDWORK OR VERIFY WITH THE OWNER OR ENGINEER THAT PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. PERMIT FEES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OFTHE CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE ARRANGED WITH THE OWNER.4. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF DOORWAYS, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS,PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY CONNECTION LOCATIONS.5. ALL PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE SERVICE LINE CONSTRUCTION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY CITY PERMITS FOR UTILITY CONNECTIONS, AND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED ANDAPPROVED BY THE CITY. THE CITY SHALL BE NOTIFIED 48-HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH THE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION OR ANYREQUIRED TESTING. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE, INTERFERE WITH, CONNECT ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO, OR TAP ANY WATER MAINBELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF SCHEDULED ORUNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.7. WATER MAIN LENGTHS AS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE HORIZONTAL LENGTHS. ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL PIPE WHEN INSTALLING ONSLOPES OR WHEN DEFLECTIONS ARE REQUIRED. THE JOINT DEFLECTIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM RECOMMENDED BY THE PIPEMANUFACTURER OR BY LOCAL GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS. FITTINGS REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT WATER MAIN SHALL BE INCLUDED INWATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION.8. PROVIDE WATER MAIN THRUST RESTRAINTS PER CITY STANDARD REQUIREMENTS.9. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATER LINE CROSSINGS WITH SANITARY SEWER OR STORMSEWER. THE WATER LINE SHALL NOT HAVE JOINTS OR CONNECTION WITHIN 10-FEET OF THE CROSSING. INSULATE CROSSINGS WITHSTORM SEWER.10. UTILITY SERVICES TYPICALLY TERMINATE 5' OUTSIDE BUILDING WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN OR NOTED.11. DUCTILE IRON WATER LINES SHALL BE CLASS 52, PER AWWA C115 OR C151. COPPER WATER LINES SHALL BE TYPE K PER ASTM B88. PVCWATER LINES SHALL BE PER AWWA C900 AND INSTALLED PER AWWA C605 IF ALLOWED BY CITY.12. ALL WATER LINES SHALL HAVE 7.5' MINIMUM COVER. INSULATE WATER MAIN IF LESS THAN 8' OF COVER. INSULATION SHALL BE DOWSTYROFOAM HI BRAND 35 OR EQUIVALENT, WITH 4 INCHES OF THICKNESS.13. SANITARY SEWER PIPE OUTSIDE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SDR 35 OR 26. SDR 26 IS REQUIRED FORDEPTHS GREATER THAN 15 FEET. SANITARY SEWER PIPE WITHIN 5 FEET OF THE BUILDING AND UNDER FOOTINGS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40PER ASTM D2665. ALL PLASTIC SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE INSTALLED PER D2321. SOLVENT WELD JOINTS MUST INCLUDE USE OF APRIMER WHICH IS OF A CONTRASTING COLOR TO THE PIPE AND CEMENT. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE TESTED ACCORDING TOMINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PART 712.0.14. STORM SEWER PIPE:A. RCP AND HDPE PIPE MAY BE INSTALLED WITH APPROVAL OF LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY.B. REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 5 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 18" AND SMALLER, CLASS 3 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 21" ANDLARGER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, PER ASTM C76 WITH R-4 GASKETS.C. HDPE STORM PIPE 4- TO 10-INCHES IN DIAMETER SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTO M252. HDPE STORM PIPE 12- TO60-INCHES IN DIAMETER SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2306. FITTINGS SHALL BE PER ASTM D3212 AND INSTALLED PERASTM D2321.D. PVC STORM SEWER PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PIPE PER ASTM D2665 AND INSTALLED PER ASTM D2321.E. CORRUGATED METAL PIPE (CMP) FOR SIZES 18- TO 120-INCH AND MUST MEET ASTM A760 OR ASTM A796 AND BE INSTALLED PERASTM A798. CMP MAY NOT BE INSTALLED WITHIN 10-FEET OF A WATERMAIN, WATER SERVICE, OR A BUILDING.F. ALL STORM SEWER JOINTS AND STRUCTURE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT AS REQUIRED BY MINNESOTAPLUMBING CODE, PART 707.3. STORM SEWER LOCATED WITHIN 10-FEET OF A BUILDING AND/OR WATER LINE SHALL BE TESTED PERMINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PART 712.15. ALL NONCONDUCTIVE PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A LOCATE (TRACER) WIRE PER MINNESOTA RULES, PART 7560.0150.16. POST INDICATOR VALVES SHALL BE CLOW F-5750 (OR EQUIVALENT) MEETING AWWA STANDARD C509 AND CITY STANDARDS. VALVE TOBE MECHANICAL JOINT RESILIENT WEDGE GATE VALVE. POST TO BE ADJUSTABLE FOR 8 FEET WATER MAIN DEPTH. THE ELECTRICAL ALARMSWITCH SHALL BE PART NO. PCVS2 (OR EQUIVALENT).17. AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN AS-BUILT RECORD OF UTILITYCONSTRUCTION. THE AS-BUILT SHALL INCLUDE LOCATION AND LENGTH DEVIATIONS OR CHANGES TO THE PLAN. CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY WITH OWNER OR ENGINEER WHETHER A PLAN WITH POST-CONSTRUCTION ELEVATIONS IS REQUIRED.18. ALL MANHOLE CASTINGS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.05 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS ON PLAN REFLECT THE SUMPED ELEVATIONS.19. ALL CATCH BASIN CASTINGS IN CURB SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET AND MANHOLE CASTINGS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.05FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS ON PLAN REFLECT THE SUMPED ELEVATIONS.GENERAL UTILITY NOTESSDTNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION0'30'60'90'1" = 30'A. CONNECT TO EXISTING. COORDINATE CONNECTION WITH THE CITY.UTILITY KEYNOTEA GASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGAS GAS GAS PUG PUG PUGPUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUGFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FO FO FOFOFO FO FOPUGPUGPUGPUG WAT PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUGPUGPUGPUGPUG PUGGAS GAS CTVCTV CTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVFO FO FO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FO FO FO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FOPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FOFOFOFOTUGPUGPUG P U GPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUG PUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVXXXFO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOPUGPUGPUGFND.TPOSTSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STO STOSTO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSANSANSANSANSANSTOSANSTOSTO WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWEST 70TH STREETFRANCE AVENUE SOUTH COUNTY ROAD NO. 17 8882010 2010 UTILITY EASEMENT PER THE PLATOF YORKTOWN DOC. NO.1033725 (ITEM NO. 11)22822TELECOMMUNICATIONS EASEMENTPER DOC. NO. 983149 (ITEM NO. 12)SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTPER DOC. NO. (ITEM NO. 11)152020.0015SCENIC AND OPEN SPACE EASEMENT INFAVOR OF EDINA VILLAGE (NOW CITY)PER DOC. NO. 1033728 (ITEM NO. 14)SCENIC AND OPEN SPACE EASEMENT INFAVOR OF EDINA VILLAGE (NOW CITY) PERDOC. NO. 1033728 (ITEM NO. 14)1010PUBLIC ROAD EASEMENT IN PER DOC.NO. 1036934 (ITEM NO. 15)STREET RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED IN THE PLAT OFYORKTOWN DOC. NO. 1033725 (ITEM NO. 16)40 40 HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO.2189613 (ITEM NOS. 15 & 16)HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC.NO. 2189613 (ITEM NOS. 15 & 16)PUBLIC STREET, DRAINAGE & UTILITYEASEMENT PER DOC. NO. T4859947(ITEM NO. 16)SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT PERDOC. NOS. T05067233 &T05132844(ITEM NO. 17)SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENTPER DOC. NOS. T05067233 &T05132844 (ITEM NO. 17)TELECOMMUNICATIONSEASEMENT PER DOC. NO.983149 (ITEM NO. 12)EEEEEEEEEEMGTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTTVTVHHTTTTSTOSTOSTOSTORIM=871.0FULL OF DEBRISRIM=870.6INV(E)=866.4INV(NE)-866.3RIM=871.6INV(E)=865.1INV(W)=864.9INV(S)=866.1RIM=869.1INV(E)=864.5RIM=868.3INV(N/E)=864.3INV(W)=863.6RIM=866.7INV(N)=862.7INV(S)=863.0INV(E/W)=862.6RIM=866.5INV(N)=862.6INV(E)=862.5INV(W)=861.7RIM=871.5INV(E)=867.215" RCPRIM=867.5INV=863.2RIM = 862.97IE = 855.15 (CITY AS-BUILT)RIM=866.8INV(E)=859.4INV(W)=859.1RIM=862.8INV(N)=857.2INV(E)=859.2INV(SE)=857.5INV(SW)=856.3RIM=866.2INV=863.3RIM=869.5FULL OFWATERRIM=871.1INV=868.0RIM=863.4FULL OF ICE& DEBRISRIM=863.1INV(NE)=859.6INV(W)=859.1RIM=861.2INV=858.112" RCPRIM=861.8INV(E)=857.7INV(W)=858.2INV(S)=857.6RIM=862.1INV=857.912" RCPRIM=862.5INV(N)=852.8INV(S)=852.615" RCP21" RCPS12" RCP21" RCP12" RCP21" RCP9" CLAY @ 0.8%24" RCP24" RCP24" RCP12" RCP 8"PVC 12"RCP ST-5ST-6ST-4ST-3ST-2ST-116" ASH13" LCH14" ASH10" ASH15" LCH12" ASH GW: 853.0GW: 853.5GW: 858.0GW: 848.6GW: NOT OBSERVEDGW: NOT OBSERVEDCOMMERCIAL/GROCERY/RETAIL SPACEFOOTPRINT = 51,600 SFFFE = 868.00MULTI-FAMILY HOUSINGFOOTPRINT = 44,300 SFFFE = 870.75SENIOR HOUSINGFOOTPRINT = 21,050 SFFFE = 866.25XXXX8" PVC ROOF DRAINIE=861.258" PVC ROOF DRAINIE=861.258" PVC ROOF DRAINIE=861.2510" PVC ROOF DRAINIE=862.1010" PVC ROOF DRAINIE=860.1012" PVC ROOF DRAINIE=859.50FLOOD STORAGE VAULTBOTTOM OF VAULT = 855.00TOP OF VAULT = 862.00TOTAL VOLUME = 30,240 CFSTORMTECH MC-3500 CHAMBERSBOTTOM OF ROCK=856.00BOTTOM OF CHAMBERS=856.75WEIR ELEV=858.75INFILTRATION VOLUME=19,796 CFTOTAL VOLUME=32,712 CF18" STORM STUBIE=859.10STMH 101RIM=862.80IE(S,NE)=856.6028 LF - 15" RCP@ 1.04%54 LF - 15" RCP @ 1.04%REPLACE STMH 100RIM=862.80IE(W,N)=856.30STMH 102RIM=864.30IE(N)=859.30IE(SW,E)=857.15202 LF - 15" RCP @ 0.50%STMH 103RIM=865.25IE(NE,W)=858.17OCS 104RIM=864.75IE(N)=856.75IE(SW)=858.2823 LF - 15" RCP @ 0.50%CBMH 302RIM=865.30IE(E)=861.05IE(S)=859.30IE(W)=859.00110 LF - 21" RCP @ 0.50%CBMH 201RIM=865.35IE(NE)=861.353' SUMP=858.3516 LF -12" RCP@ 0.60%STMH 200RIM=865.50IE(SW)=861.25IE(W,E)=857.95CB 310RIM=863.50IE(S,E)=859.00STMH 300RIM=865.20IE(S)=858.28IE(N,E)=856.75CBMH 301RIM=865.35IE(E)=858.70IE(W,N)=858.453' SUMP=855.4556 LF - 30" RCP@ 0.30%STORMWATER PUMP - DUPLEX DISCHARGE RATE BELOW5 CFS. RATE TO BE COORDINATED WITH CITY.CONNECT TO BOX CULVERTSTORAGE SYSTEM.29 LF - 18" RCP@ 1.00%CB 304RIM=865.50IE(W,E)=862.50190 LF - 12" RCP @ 0.50%100 LF - 12" RCP @ 0.50%CBMH 302RIM=867.60IE(S,W)=862.00CB 411RIM=866.15IE(E)=862.153' SUMP=859.15CB 421RIM=867.15IE(E)=863.153' SUMP=860.15STMH 430RIM=867.90IE(E)=862.00IE(N,S)=857.95STMH 440RIM=866.10IE(E)=860.00IE(N,S)=857.9524 LF - TRENCHDRAIN @ 1.00%TRENCH DRAINRIM=867.80IE(S)=866.56TRENCH DRAINRIM=867.80IE(S)=866.80120 LF - 12" PVC @ 0.78%CBMH 501RIM=870.60IE(E)=866.40IE(S)=865.63IE(N)=865.1333 LF - 15" RCP @ 0.70%REBUILD STMH 500RIM=871.60IE(N)=867.05IE(E)=865.10IE(S)=864.90IE(W)=864.901234567891011121314151617181920GENERATOR FOR STORM PUMP - GARAGE LEVELSHEET NUMBER:DATE:DATE:LICENSE NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA VERTICAL SCALE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: DRAWN: CHECKED: DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:PREPARED FOR: Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 N:\0029211.10\DWG\CIVIL\0029211.10UT01.DWG EDINA, MN10/16/2070TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTSTORM SEWER PLAN 70TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTC401 .10/16/20DAVID T. BADE . . . 10/16/20 4530 WEST 77TH STREET SUITE #365EDINA, MN 55435 ORION/MORTENSON © 2020 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com### ### or ## . . . . . . . . . .PROJECT NUMBER: 0029211.10SANEXISTINGPROPOSEDSANITARY SEWERSTOSTORM SEWERWATWATER MAINEASEMENT LINEPROPERTY LINEWATHYDRANTGATE VALVEDRAIN TILEFLARED END SECTION (WITH RIPRAP)LIGHT POLEGASGASGASPUGUNDERGROUND ELECTRICPUGTUGUNDERGROUND TELEPHONETOHPOHOVERHEAD ELECTRICPOHTOHOVERHEAD TELEPHONETOHFOTELEPHONE FIBER OPTICFOCTVCABLE TELEVISIONCTVFMFMSANITARY SEWER FORCE MAINCURB AND GUTTERUTILITY LEGEND1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESEPLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THEINFORMATION SHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES.2. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATER MAIN MATERIAL AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE PER CITY REQUIREMENTS, MINNESOTAPLUMBING CODE, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICELINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OFMINNESOTA.3. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE NECESSARY FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS FOR THE PROPOSEDWORK OR VERIFY WITH THE OWNER OR ENGINEER THAT PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. PERMIT FEES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OFTHE CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE ARRANGED WITH THE OWNER.4. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF DOORWAYS, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS,PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY CONNECTION LOCATIONS.5. ALL PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE SERVICE LINE CONSTRUCTION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY CITY PERMITS FOR UTILITY CONNECTIONS, AND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED ANDAPPROVED BY THE CITY. THE CITY SHALL BE NOTIFIED 48-HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH THE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION OR ANYREQUIRED TESTING. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE, INTERFERE WITH, CONNECT ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO, OR TAP ANY WATER MAINBELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF SCHEDULED ORUNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.7. WATER MAIN LENGTHS AS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE HORIZONTAL LENGTHS. ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL PIPE WHEN INSTALLING ONSLOPES OR WHEN DEFLECTIONS ARE REQUIRED. THE JOINT DEFLECTIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM RECOMMENDED BY THE PIPEMANUFACTURER OR BY LOCAL GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS. FITTINGS REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT WATER MAIN SHALL BE INCLUDED INWATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION.8. PROVIDE WATER MAIN THRUST RESTRAINTS PER CITY STANDARD REQUIREMENTS.9. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATER LINE CROSSINGS WITH SANITARY SEWER OR STORMSEWER. THE WATER LINE SHALL NOT HAVE JOINTS OR CONNECTION WITHIN 10-FEET OF THE CROSSING. INSULATE CROSSINGS WITHSTORM SEWER.10. UTILITY SERVICES TYPICALLY TERMINATE 5' OUTSIDE BUILDING WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN OR NOTED.11. DUCTILE IRON WATER LINES SHALL BE CLASS 52, PER AWWA C115 OR C151. COPPER WATER LINES SHALL BE TYPE K PER ASTM B88. PVCWATER LINES SHALL BE PER AWWA C900 AND INSTALLED PER AWWA C605 IF ALLOWED BY CITY.12. ALL WATER LINES SHALL HAVE 8' MINIMUM COVER. INSULATE WATER MAIN IF LESS THAN 8' OF COVER. INSULATION SHALL BE DOWSTYROFOAM HI BRAND 35 OR EQUIVALENT, WITH 4 INCHES OF THICKNESS.13. SANITARY SEWER PIPE OUTSIDE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SDR 35 OR 26. SDR 26 IS REQUIRED FORDEPTHS GREATER THAN 15 FEET. SANITARY SEWER PIPE WITHIN 5 FEET OF THE BUILDING AND UNDER FOOTINGS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40PER ASTM D2665. ALL PLASTIC SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE INSTALLED PER D2321. SOLVENT WELD JOINTS MUST INCLUDE USE OF APRIMER WHICH IS OF A CONTRASTING COLOR TO THE PIPE AND CEMENT. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE TESTED ACCORDING TOMINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PART 712.0.14. STORM SEWER PIPE:A. RCP AND HDPE PIPE MAY BE INSTALLED WITH APPROVAL OF LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY.B. REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 5 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 18" AND SMALLER, CLASS 3 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 21" ANDLARGER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, PER ASTM C76 WITH R-4 GASKETS.C. HDPE STORM PIPE 4- TO 10-INCHES IN DIAMETER SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTO M252. HDPE STORM PIPE 12- TO60-INCHES IN DIAMETER SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2306. FITTINGS SHALL BE PER ASTM D3212 AND INSTALLED PERASTM D2321.D. PVC STORM SEWER PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PIPE PER ASTM D2665 AND INSTALLED PER ASTM D2321.E. CORRUGATED METAL PIPE (CMP) FOR SIZES 18- TO 120-INCH AND MUST MEET ASTM A760 OR ASTM A796 AND BE INSTALLED PERASTM A798. CMP MAY NOT BE INSTALLED WITHIN 10-FEET OF A WATERMAIN, WATER SERVICE, OR A BUILDING.F. ALL STORM SEWER JOINTS AND STRUCTURE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT AS REQUIRED BY MINNESOTAPLUMBING CODE, PART 707.3. STORM SEWER LOCATED WITHIN 10-FEET OF A BUILDING AND/OR WATER LINE SHALL BE TESTED PERMINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PART 712.15. ALL NONCONDUCTIVE PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A LOCATE (TRACER) WIRE PER MINNESOTA RULES, PART 7560.0150.16. POST INDICATOR VALVES SHALL BE CLOW F-5750 (OR EQUIVALENT) MEETING AWWA STANDARD C509 AND CITY STANDARDS. VALVE TOBE MECHANICAL JOINT RESILIENT WEDGE GATE VALVE. POST TO BE ADJUSTABLE FOR 8 FEET WATER MAIN DEPTH. THE ELECTRICAL ALARMSWITCH SHALL BE PART NO. PCVS2 (OR EQUIVALENT).17. AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN AS-BUILT RECORD OF UTILITYCONSTRUCTION. THE AS-BUILT SHALL INCLUDE LOCATION AND LENGTH DEVIATIONS OR CHANGES TO THE PLAN. CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY WITH OWNER OR ENGINEER WHETHER A PLAN WITH POST-CONSTRUCTION ELEVATIONS IS REQUIRED.18. ALL MANHOLE CASTINGS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.05 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS ON PLAN REFLECT THE SUMPED ELEVATIONS.19. ALL CATCH BASIN CASTINGS IN CURB SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET AND MANHOLE CASTINGS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.05FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS ON PLAN REFLECT THE SUMPED ELEVATIONS.GENERAL UTILITY NOTESSDT1UTILITY CROSSINGSNUMBER SAN IE STM IE-857.022-857.393856.46857.434855.89-5856.21-6-857.997857.15858.048857.02-9-858.3810857.36858.4211858.35-12861.61-13861.67858.6214859.23-15859.78-16866.01861.2917865.94-NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION0'30'60'90'1" = 30'18865.81-19866.50-20864.97-WM TOP856.50 - LOWER WM856.70 - LOWER WM-856.50 - LOWER WM856.50 - LOWER WM858.00 - LOWER WM-857.20 - LOWER WM858.00 - LOWER WM-859.40859.17-860.50 - LOWER WM861.2-862.50862.80863.28864.33 SHEET NUMBER:DATE:DATE:LICENSE NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA VERTICAL SCALE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: DRAWN: CHECKED: DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:PREPARED FOR: Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 N:\0029211.10\DWG\CIVIL\0029211.10DT01.DWG EDINA, MN10/16/2070TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTCITY DETAILS 70TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTC500 .10/16/20DAVID T. BADE . . . 10/16/20 4530 WEST 77TH STREET SUITE #365EDINA, MN 55435 ORION/MORTENSON © 2020 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com### ### or ## . . . . . . . . . .PROJECT NUMBER: 0029211.10NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION0'#########1" = ### SHEET NUMBER:DATE:DATE:LICENSE NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA VERTICAL SCALE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: DRAWN: CHECKED: DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:PREPARED FOR: Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 N:\0029211.10\DWG\CIVIL\0029211.10DT01.DWG EDINA, MN10/16/2070TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTDETAILS 70TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTC501 .10/16/20DAVID T. BADE . . . 10/16/20 4530 WEST 77TH STREET SUITE #365EDINA, MN 55435 ORION/MORTENSON © 2020 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com### ### or ## . . . . . . . . . .PROJECT NUMBER: 0029211.104"LAST REVISED:08/08/17WM06WATERMAIN INSULATIONSEWERWATERMINIMUM 2INSULATION LAYERSWITH JOINTSSTAGGERED6" COMPACTEDGRANULAR FILLWATERMAINW.M. COVER WIDTH (W) 4.0'-4.9' 8' 5.0'-5.9' 6' 6.0'-7.0' 4' 7.0' + 0'NOTES:1. INSULATION SHALL BE EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE (XEPS) INSULATION BOARD, "CERTIFOAM SE" OR"STYROFOAM SM" OR EQUIVALENT.2. INSULATION SHALL BE PLACED ON A SMOOTH, LEVEL FOUNDATION WHICH HAS BEEN FIRMLY COMPACTED.3. SEPARATE LAYERS OF INSULATION USED TO MAKE UP THE 4" THICKNESS SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTSTO ENSURE THE CONTINUITY OF THE INSULATION.4. ALL WATERMAIN/ STORM SEWER CROSSINGS WITH LESS THAN 36" CLEARANCE SHALL BE INSULATED.5. SANITARY SEWER INSULATION SIMILARMINIMUM 1 1/2" THICK INSULATIONLAYERS WITH JOINTS STAGGEREDAND EXTENDING 4' EACH WAYFROM WATERMAIN C/LMECHANICAL COMPACTEDBACKFILL6"W/2W/218"MIN.INSULATION FOR SHALLOW WATER MAININSULATION AT PIPE CROSSING4"ENTRANCE THRU CURB AND GUTTERSI07NOTES:1. 1/2" PREFORMED JOINT FILLER MATERIAL- AASHTO M2132. CONCRETE GUTTER SHALL BE PER MnDOT SPEC 2531LAST REVISED:08/15/17PLAN VIEWSECTION A-A1/2" EXPANSION JOINT 3'R MIN.VARIABLE WIDTH TO BE STAKED IN FIELD1/2" EXPANSION JOINT IFMATCHING CONCRETE3'3'R MIN.1/2" EXPANSION JOINTFLOW LINETO BE PAID AS 6" CONC. APRONTO BE PAID ASCONC. C&G TO BE PAID ASCONC. C&GBIT. SURFGUTTERAS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER3.0'TO BE PAID AS6" CONC. D.W.TO BE PAID AS 6" CONC. APRONAA6"MAX.AANOTES:1. PROVIDE A RELATIVELY FLAT MINIMUM 4'x4' LANDING BEHIND THE PEDESTRIAN RAMP, 2% MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE BOTH DIRECTIONS.2. CURB RAMP AREA TO BE CONCRETE AND MEET LATEST ADA REQUIREMENTS. RAMP CROSS SLOPE 2% MAXIMUM. BACK-TO-BACK PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SHALL HAVE MINIMUM 48'' LANDING BETWEEN, OR PROVIDE AT-GRADE CROSSING.3. SIDE FLARES TO BE CONCRETE AND IMPLEMENTED WHERE ADJACENT TO PAVED AREAS. FLARED SLOPE TO BE 10% MAXIMUM. EXISTING CURB RAMP ALTERATIONS, WITH NO LANDING, SHALL BE 8.33% MAXIMUM. PROVIDE 10% MAXIMUM SLOPE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.4. ANY VERTICAL LIP THAT OCCURS AT THE FLOW LINE MAY NOT BE GREATER THAN 1/4 INCH.5. ADA REQUIRED DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE(TRUNCATED DOMES) SHALL BE 2' MIN. IN DIRECTION OF LANDING AT CURB AND SHALL EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH OF THE LANDING. AREA SHALL BE CONTRASTING COLOR TO THE ADJACENT WALKING SURFACE WITH A PREFABRICATED CAST IRON TRUNCATED DOME INSERT MEETING THE ADA DOME SIZE AND SPACING REQUIREMENTS.ALAST REVISED:08/15/17PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPSI09AA332233FACE OFCURBBACK OFCURBFACE OFCURB15158"5' MIN.4' MIN. ORPER PLAN5' M IN . 5'-4"MIN. 2' 8"5' MIN.5' MIN.4' MIN. ORPER PLAN5'-4"MIN. 2'CURB FACEOR GUTTER5% APPROACHSLOPE MAXSEE NOTE #41/2" PREFORMEDJOINT FILLER MATERIALRAMP5'-4" MIN.LANDING4' MIN.RAMP 8.33%MAX. SLOPECONCRETE WALKDET. WARN.SURFACEROUND ALL SLOPEDINTERSECTIONSSIDE FLARE 10%MAX. SLOPESIDE FLARE5' MIN.RAMP4' MIN.SIDE FLARE5' MIN.ELEVATION OF RAMPSECTION A-APLAN VIEW OF DIAGONAL RAMPPLAN VIEW OF PERPENDICULAR RAMPNOTES:1. TAPED AREAS TO BE CENTERED AND ALIGNED ON CENTER LINE AND LANE LINES. MAKE ADJUSTMENTS IN CENTER MEDIAN AREA.2. ZEBRA CROSSWALKS SHALL BE WHITE POLYMER-PREFORMED TAPE OR AN ACCEPTABLE EQUIVALENT APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.3. A MINIMUM OF 1.5 FT. CLEAR DISTANCE MUST BE LEFT ADJACENT TO CURB. IF LAST STRIPED AREA FALLS INTO THIS DISTANCE, IT MUST BE OMITTED.4. REMOVE ALL CONFLICTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.5. AT SKEWED CROSSWALKS, THE TAPED AREAS ARE TO REMAIN PARALLEL TO THE LANE LINES.6. WHERE PAVEMENT MARKINGS CAN NOT BE INLAYED INTO THE HOT MAT, PAVEMENT SHALL BE GROOVED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE POLYMER-PREFORMED MARKINGS. SEE Mn/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 2564.LAST REVISED:08/15/17CROSS WALK STRIPINGSI11PAVEMENT MARKING(TYP.)DRIVING LANE(WIDTH VARIES)6 FT3 FT 3 FTDRIVING LANE(WIDTH VARIES)ROADCLNOTE:1. ALL TRAFFIC FLOW ARROWS TO BE SOLID WHITE REFLECTIVE TRAFFIC PAINT AS PER DIMENSIONS ABOVETRAFFIC ARROWLAST REVISED:08/15/17SI132.001.753.751.002.00R4.75HANDICAP SYMBOLLAST REVISED:08/15/17HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE AND STRIPINGSI15HANDICAP SIGNNOPARKINGNOTE:BOTTOM OF SIGNS TO BE MOUNTED60"-66" FROM PARKING GRADE, SEESIGN POST INSTALLATION DETAILHANDICAP PARKINGNOTE:STRIPING TO MATCHPARKING, UNLESSPER LOCAL CODENOTE:SEE PLAN FOR PARKING LAYOUTNOPARKINGPARKINGVEHICLE IDREQUIREDUP TO $200 FINEFOR VIOLATIONVANACCESSIBLENOPARKING ACCESS AISLEHANDICAP PARKING SPACE WITHPAINTED INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OFACCESSIBILITY WITH CONTRASTINGSQUARE BACKGROUND, CENTEREDTOWARD DRIVE AISLE.HANDICAP PARKINGSIGNS, 12"X18", OR PERLOCAL CODEHANDICAP SIGNCENTERED AT HEAD OFSPACE ON CENTER STRIPEHANDICAP PARKING ACCESSAISLE WITH PAINTED 12"HIGH LETTERING OF "NOPARKING" CENTEREDTOWARD DRIVE AISLEPER CITYCODE HANDICAP VANACCESSIBLE PARKINGSIGN, 12"X16", OR PERLOCAL CODE, ASAPPLICABLEFACE OF CURBSIDEWALKHANDICAP SIGNCENTERED AT HEAD OFSPACE, 2' MIN. AND 8'MAX. FROM FACE OFCURB2"-0"2"-0"10" DIAMETER CENTERSYMBOL IN PARKING STALL,ALL LINES TO BE 5" WIDE2"-0"NOPARKING4" WIDE PAINTED STRIPINGAT 45 DEGREES AND AT 2'O.C. AT ACCESS AISLE8'MIN.8'MIN.8'MIN.5°67.5°SI19PAVEMENT SECTIONS SHOWN ARE FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY.REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR FINAL PAVEMENT SECTIONS.LAST REVISED:08/15/17PAVEMENT SECTIONSX" MnDOT TYPE SPWEA340E WEARING COURSEX" MnDOT TYPE SPNWB330E BASE COURSEX" MnDOT SPEC. 3138 CLASS 5X" CONCRETE PAVEMENT W/ #4 REBAR AT 16" O.C. EACH WAYX" MnDOT SPEC. 3138 CLASS 5CONCRETE PAVEMENTBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (HEAVY DUTY)BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (STANDARD DUTY)COMPACTED SAND SUBGRADE (100% STANDARD PROCTOR)COMPACTED SAND SUBGRADE (100% STANDARD PROCTOR)MNDOT SPEC. 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COATX" MnDOT TYPE SPWEA340E WEARING COURSEX" MnDOT TYPE SPNWB330E BASE COURSEX" MnDOT SPEC. 3138 CLASS 5COMPACTED SAND SUBGRADE (100% STANDARD PROCTOR)MNDOT SPEC. 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT6" COMPACTED CL. 5 AGGREGATEBASE, MNDOT 3138, 2211LAST REVISED:08/15/17HEAVY DUTY CONCRETESECTION LOADING DOCKSI21NOTES:1. CONCRETE SHALL BE REINFORCED WITH WELDED WIRE FABRIC OR REINFORCED BARS TO ASSIST IN CONTROLLING CRACKING FROM DRYING SHRINKAGE AND THERMAL CHANGES.2. SAWED OR FORMED CONTROL JOINTS SHOULD BE INCLUDED FOR EACH 225 SQUARE FEET OF AREA OR LESS (15 FEET BY 15 FEET). CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE JOINTING PATTERN AND SUBMIT TO ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.3. SAW CUTS SHOULD NOT CUT THROUGH THE WELDED WIRE FABRIC OR REINFORCING STEEL AND DOWELS SHOULD BE UTILIZED AT FORMED AND/OR COLD JOINTS.4. DOWELS SHALL BE UTILIZED AT FORMED AND/OR COLD JOINTS. DOWELS SHALL BE 30" LONG 1/2" DIAMETER SMOOTH AND GREASED TIE BARS AT 30" SPACING, MINIMUM 18" FROM PAVEMENT EDGE.7" 4000 PSI TYPE 3 CONCRETESURFACE COMPACTION2"4"AAMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTERCONSTRUCTION AT CATCH BASINLAST REVISED:08/15/17SI28PERSPECTIVESECTION A-ANOTE:MOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER TO BEFORMED INTO A B618 TYPE AT CATCH BASINMOUNTABLE CONCRETECURB & GUTTERCATCH BASIN FRAME& COVER#4 REBAR2" DEPRESSION10' MIN. TRANSITIONDESIGN GUTTERLINE GRADENEENAH FRAME & COVER R-3067-V WITHTYPE V GRATE OR APPROVED EQUALEXPANSION JOINTTOP OF CURB10' MIN.TRANSITION10' MIN.TRANSITIONFLOWNO SCALENO SCALEAALAST REVISED:08/15/17TRANSITION CURBSI31PERSPECTIVESECTION A-ANO SCALENO SCALEB6 STYLE CURBSEE DETAIL SI01TRANSITIONVARIESLAST REVISED:08/15/17SI40MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL8"NOTE:CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING ANDSHOP DRAWINGS IF WALL IS GREATER THAN 4FEET TALL. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT WALLBLOCK TYPE, SIZE, AND COLOR FOR APPROVAL.1" - 1 1/4"SWALE AT TOP OF WALLMAY BE REQUIRED, VERIFY8" MIN. LOW PERMEABLE SOILFILTER FABRICUNIT DRAINAGE FILL(3/4" CRUSHED ROCKOR STONE)APPROXIMATE LIMITSOF EXCAVATION4" PERFORATED PVC DRAINTILEWRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC,DAYLIGHT OR TO STORM SYSTEM,AS REQUIREDUNREINFORCED CONCRETE ORCRUSHED STONE LEVELING PADFINISHED GRADECONCRETE MODULAR BLOCKANCHORING PINS (AS REQUIRED)CAP UNIT, ADHERED TO TOPCOURSE WITH ADHESIVEFOUNDATIONSOILRETAINED SOILDESIGN HEIGHT LAST REVISED:08/15/17FENCE AT MODULAR BLOCK WALLSI41NOTE:CONCRETE SLEEVE (AND/OR FOOTING) TO BE SET DURING WALLCONSTRUCTION, NOT DRILLED THROUGH GEOGRID AFTERWARDS, WHEN DIRECTLY BEHIND UNITS.CONCRETE MODULARBLOCKFENCE POSTFENCE POST CONCRETEFOOTING AND SLEEVE,DIAMETER, AND DEPTH PERFENCE SPECIFICATIONSGEOGRIDCAP UNIT, ADHERED TO TOPCOURSE WITH ADHESIVEANCHORING PINS (AS REQUIRED)3.5' MIN.1.5'-2'±12"12"TREADLAST REVISED:08/15/17CONCRETE STAIR AND RAILINGSI48NOTES:1. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR APPROVAL. FIELD VERIFY CONDITIONS.2. RAILING AND STAIRS BOTH SIDES OF STAIRS AND PER ADA REQUIREMENTS.3. ALL HARDWARE TO BE GALVANIZED OR STAINLESS STEEL, AND FINISH TO MATCH RAILING.4. RAILING FINISH TO BE PRIMED AND PAINTED. COLOR TO PER OWNER.HAND RAIL, 1 1/2" DIAMETERTUBULAR STEEL, WELD ANDGRIND ALL JOINTS, POSTS 6'MAXIMUM SPACING3" RADIUS(TYP.)1/2" RADIUS,NOSECONCRETESTEPS WITHNON-SLIP FINISHMNDOT 3138 CLASS 5AGGREGATE BASE#4 REBAR @12" O.C. MAX.EACH WAY,3" CLEAR#5 REBAR @ NOSE,2" CLEAR(TYP.)ADJACENT PAVEMENT(TYP.)EXPANSION JOINT(TYP.)RAILING POST:SURFACE MOUNTOR EMBEDDED(6" DEPTH)TREAD SLOPE1/8" PER FT.SEE PLAN12"3'-0" 1'-6"12"1"6" RISERLAST REVISED:08/15/17SI50TYPICAL CURB CUT SECTION AT DRIVEWAYS3'18'3'TRANSITION TO B618CURBB618 CURB12'B618 CURBC/L DRIVEWAYSETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINE3NOTES:1. VERIFY DRIVEWAY LOCATION WITH DEVELOPER2. VERIFY MAXIMUM DRIVEWAY WIDTH WITH CITY3. LOCATION SHOWN TYPICAL FOR GARAGE RIGHT ON TANGENT OF THE ROADX'TRANSITION TO B618CURB12"MIN.LAST REVISED:08/15/17MACHINE SLICED SILT FENCE(HEAVY DUTY)GD03FLOWFLOW RUNOFFNOTES:1. INSPECT AND REPAIR FENCE AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND REMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN ACCUMULATED TO 1/2 THE HEIGHT OF THE FABRIC OR MORE.2. REMOVED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DEPOSITED TO AN AREA THAT WILL NOT CONTRIBUTE SEDIMENT OFF-SITE AND CAN BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED.3. SILT FENCE SHALL BE PLACED ON SLOPE CONTOURS TO MAXIMIZE PONDING EFFICIENCY.4. ALL ENDS OF THE SILT FENCE SHALL BE WRAPPED UPSLOPE SO THE ELEVATION OF THE BOTTOM OF FABRIC IS HIGHER THAN "PONDING HEIGHT".5. "HEAVY DUTY" IS SAME AS MACHINE SLICED ONLY HAND INSTALLED.WOVEN MONOFILAMENT (36" WIDE)FILTER FABRIC, ATTACHSECURELY TO UPSTREAMSIDE OF POST WITH 3-50LBTENSILE STRENGTH PLASTICZIP-TIES PER POST WITHINTOP 8" OF FABRIC5' STEEL T-POSTFABRIC SLICED INTOSOIL WITHCOMPACTED BACKFILL5' STEEL T-POST6'-0" MAX.SPACINGSTANDARD DETAILPONDING HEIGHTTRENCH WITH NATIVE BACKFILLLAST REVISED:08/15/17CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEGD05NOTES:1. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED UNDER ROCK/WOOD CHIPS TO STOP MUD MIGRATION THROUGH ROCK/WOOD CHIPS.2. WOODCHIPS USED FOR CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES MUST BE 80% NOT LESS THAN 2-INCHES AND NOT MORE THAN 5-INCHES. NO CHIPPED-UP MANUFACTURED WOOD AND/OR CHEMICALLY TREATED IS ALLOWED.3. ENTRANCES MUST BE MAINTAINED REGULARLY TO PREVENT SEDIMENTATION ON PUBLIC ROADWAYS. FUGITIVE ROCK OR WOODCHIPS WILL BE REMOVED FROM ADJACENT ROADWAYS DAILY OR MORE FREQUENTLY AS NECESSARY.4. LENGTH AND WIDTH TO BE ADJUSTED FOR SITE CONDITIONS.HARD SURFACEPUBLIC ROAD1"-2" WASHED ROCKOR WOODCHIPS PERSPECIFICATIONS18" MINIMUM CUT OFF TOMINIMIZE RUNOFF FROM SITEROCK=12" MIN.WOODCHIPS=18" MIN.20 ' M I N . W I D T H 50' MIN.12' MIN.15' MIN.VARIESLAST REVISED:08/15/17CONCRETE WASHOUT AREAGD08A ANOTES:1. CONCRETE WASHOUT AREAS WILL HAVE AN IMPERMEABLE LINER TO PREVENT CONCRETE WASHOUT WATER FROM INFILTRATING/CONTACTING WITH SOIL.2. IMPERMEABLE LINER INCLUDES 10 MIL POLY LINER OR COMPACTED CLAY LINER.3. WASHOUT SYSTEMS CAN BE USED AS ALTERNATE WASHOUT AREAS.ROOF ACCESSEARTH BERMMULCH & SEEDSILT FENCECONCRETEWASHOUT SIGNIMPERMEABLE LINERSILT FENCE1.5'MIN.SECTION A-APOC K E TNOTES:1. ALL GEOTEXTILE USED FOR INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE MONOFILAMENT IN BOTH DIRECTIONS, (MEETING MnDOT SPEC. 3733 GEOTEXTILES)2. FINISHED SIZE (INCLUDING POCKETS) SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 10" AROUND THE PERIMETER TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE OR REMOVAL.3. DO NOT INSTALL PROTECTION IN INLETS SHALLOWER THAN 30". THE INSTALLED BAG SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM SIDE CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE INLET WALLS AND THE BAG, MEASURED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OVERFLOW HOLES, OF 3". WHERE NECESSARY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLINCH THE BAG (USING PLASTIC ZIP TIES) TO ACHIEVE THE 3" CLEARANCE.LAST REVISED:08/15/17STORM DRAINFILTER BAG INSERTGD10FLAP4"INLET SPECIFICATIONSTO MATCH THE PLANDIMENSION LENGTHAND WIDTH21MINIMUM DOUBLESTITCHED SEAMS ALLAROUND SIDE PIECESAND ON FLAP POCKETSFRONT, BACK, ANDBOTTOM TO BEMADE FROM SINGLEPIECE OF FABRIC2"x4" HOLE SHALL BEHEAT CUT INTO ALLFOUR SIDE PANELSUSE REBAR OR STEEL RODFOR REMOVAL ( FOR INLETSWITH CAST CURB BOX,REPLACE ROD WITH WOOD2" X 4") . EXTEND 10"BEYOND GRATE ON BOTHSIDES, SECURE TO GRATEWITH WIRE OR PLASTIC TIES41 2 " 12"12"2"LAST REVISED:08/15/17INLET PROTECTION WITH ROCK LOGGD11NOTE:1. ALL GEOTEXTILE USED FOR INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE MONOFILAMENT IN BOTH DIRECTIONS. (MEETING SPEC. 3733 (TYPE 1) GEOTEXTILES, PROPOSED 2005 EDITION)ENDS SECURELYCLOSED TO PREVENTLOSS OF OPENGRADED AGGREGATEFILL. SECURED WITH50 PSI ZIP TIEOVERLAP ENDS 6"4' LONG AND 5" DIAMETER GEOTEXTILE SOCK.SEAM JOINED BY TWO ROWS OF STITCHINGWITH A PLASTIC MESH BACKING ORHEATBONDED. (OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT)FILL ROCK LOG WITH OPEN GRADEDAGGREGATE CONSISTING OF SOUND,DURABLE PARTICLES OF CRUSHED QUARRYROCK OR GRAVEL CONFORMING TO 3137,CA-3 (<1.5") GRADATION (OR EQUIVALENT).6"MAX.8"ANOTES:1. PROVIDE A RELATIVELY FLAT MINIMUM 4'x4' LANDING BEHIND THE PEDESTRIAN RAMP, 2% MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE BOTH DIRECTIONS.2. CURB RAMP AREA TO BE CONCRETE AND MEET LATEST ADA REQUIREMENTS. RAMP CROSS SLOPE 2% MAXIMUM. BACK-TO-BACK PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SHALL HAVE MINIMUM 48'' LANDING BETWEEN, OR PROVIDE AT-GRADE CROSSING.3. SIDE FLARES TO BE CONCRETE AND IMPLEMENTED WHERE ADJACENT TO PAVED AREAS. FLARED SLOPE TO BE 10% MAXIMUM. EXISTING CURB RAMP ALTERATIONS, WITH NO LANDING, SHALL BE 8.33% MAXIMUM. PROVIDE 10% MAXIMUM SLOPE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.4. ANY VERTICAL LIP THAT OCCURS AT THE FLOW LINE MAY NOT BE GREATER THAN 1/4 INCH.5. RAMP AND FLARED SIDE SURFACE TO BE MEDIUM BROOM FINISH, PERPENDICULAR TO TRAVEL PATH.6. WALK SHALL BE PER MnDOT SPEC 2521 MIX NO. 3A32 WITH A 28-DAY DESIGN STRENGTH OF 3900-PSI.ALAST REVISED:08/15/17PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPSI092PLAN VIEW OF DIAGONAL RAMPPLAN VIEW OF PERPENDICULAR RAMPSECTION A-AELEVATION OF RAMP32333FACE OFCURB5BACK OFCURB5FACE OFCURBCURB FACEOR GUTTER5% APPROACHSLOPE MAX1/2" PREFORMEDJOINT FILLER MATERIALRAMP 8.33%MAX. SLOPEROUND ALL SLOPEDINTERSECTIONSSIDE FLARE 10%MAX. SLOPECONCRETE WALK8" 5'-4"MIN.5' MIN.4' MIN. ORPER PLAN5' M IN . 5'-4"MIN.5' MIN.5' MIN.4' MIN. ORPER PLANRAMP5'-4" MIN.LANDING4' MIN.SIDE FLARE5' MIN.RAMP4' MIN.SIDE FLARE5' MIN.AA1143'-0"7'-0"3'-0"SIGN INSTALLEDIN LANDSCAPE AREAHANDICAP STALL PARKING SIGNINSTALLED IN PARKING LOTNOTE:1. SIGN TO BE 2-SIDED WHERE HANDICAP PARKING STALLS FACE ONE ANOTHER.2. PARKING GRADE IS DEFINED AS EITHER FLOW LINE OF CURB OR PAVEMENT SURFACEAT THE HEAD OF THE STALL.12"LAST REVISED:06/15/19SIGN POST INSTALLATIONSI14CONCRETE CURB &GUTTERCAP REQUIRED2" GALVANIZEDSTEEL PIPE,ROUND, SET INCONCRETEMOWING EDGEPAVEMENT6" STEELCASINGCONCRETEFOOTING2'-0"MIN.10"BOTTOM OF THELOWEST SIGN TOBE MOUNTED60"-66" FROMPARKING GRADE2'-0"MIN.3'-6" MIN. FROSTDEPTH IF GREATERCONCRETE CROSS GUTTERSI06NOTES:1. 1/2" PREFORMED JOINT FILLER MATERIAL- AASHTO M2132. CONCRETE GUTTER SHALL BE PER MnDOT SPEC 2531LAST REVISED:08/15/17EXPANSION JOINT(TYP.)SLOPE3/4" per ft3'7"#4 REBARSECTION A-A3' MIN.GUTTER FLOW LINEAA1LAST REVISED:01/09/20B6 STYLE CURB AND GUTTERSI01NOTES:1. EXPANSION JOINT SPACING IS 100'2. MIN. 3" CL. 5 UNDER C.&G.3. CURB SHALL BE PER MnDOT SPEC 25317"8"X"Y"6"13 1/2"Curb TypeXYB612B618B62424"18"12" 20"26"32"SLOPE 3/4" PER FT.13R-3"R=3"R=1/2"TIP OUT SLOPE 3/4" PER FT.LAST REVISED:11/29/18FLUSH CURB AND GUTTERSI02-D12"8"20"SLOPE GUTTER TO MATCH(3/4" PER FT. TYP)TIP GUTTER OUT AS REQUIRED3" RADIUS1/2" RADIUS7"1/4" BACK8.5" 1A0.32-B1A0.33-B1A0.30-B1A0.31-BNot EnclosedELEVATORLOBBYBANK TO BEDEVELOPED BYOTHERSWAT CTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTV CTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVXXXXXX STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STO STOSTOSTOSTO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT70.00WEST 70TH STREET110N. LINE OF SEC. 32, TWP. 28, RGE. 24NW CORNER OF SEC. 32,TWP. 28, RGE. 2470.00N89°50'44"E 505.00S00°11'54"E 496.57S89°48'06"W 524.96N00°12'08"W 476.97 28.27N44°49'18"EMT STSTSTSTSTSTSTTVTVHHTTTTSTO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSABABBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBFFFBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCBCBCBGCBCBCBBBBCCBCBGCCCBCBGGGGGKEEEEGGEKEEEGEEGKEKKKBBBBBBBBBEDDDJKDEELMLMEGEGNLLOHH8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"5'-0"6'-0" 10'-0"11'-0"11'-0"AWALKCCIP PLANT BED CURBDCIP RETAINING WALLELIMESTONE FEATURESTREE GRATESFBENCH FEATURESGWASTE AND RECYCLINGHBIKE RACKSICANOPY/ PERGOLA FEATUREJSCULPTURAL/ ART MOMENTPLAN KEYNOTES:BPLANTING BEDKSTAIRLMHANDRAILSNSIGNAGEOTABLE AND CHAIRS CONCRETE PAVINGDECORATIVE PAVING ADECORATIVE PAVING BTURFPLANT BEDSTORM FILTRATION FEATURELANDSCAPE SITE PLAN HATCH LEGEND:SITE PLAN01L1.0 20'40'10'0'SCALE:1"=20'PLANNORTHA BC DSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORC O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan, specification,orreport was prepared by me or under mydirectsupervision and that I am a duly licensedlandscape architect under the laws of the Stateof Minnesota10/7/2020 9:06:34 PM 20364MG / JC TM70th & France70th & FranceEdina, MNNORTHTRUENo.Description DateTerry Minarik42422 10-16-2020530 N THIRD ST, SUITE 120,MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55102PH: 612.333.3702 FAX: 515.288.8359www.thinkconfluence.comL1.0LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN Not EnclosedELEVATORLOBBYGAS GAS GAS GASFOFOFOFO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FO FO FO FOFOFOFO FO FO FO FO WAT GAS GAS GASCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOTUG TUGCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTV CTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVXXXXXXFO FO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOXXXX PUG PUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STOSTO STOSTOSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSTOWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWEST 70TH STREET110N. LINE OF SEC. 32, TWP. 28, RGE. 24TWP. 28, RGE. 24N89°50'44"E 505.00S89°48'06"W 524.96N00°12'08"W 476.97 28.27N44°49'18"E EEEEEEEMGGGTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTTVTVHHTTTTSTO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOS(2) Rg(2) Rg(16) Dt(16) Dt(5) Rg(5) Rg(16) Dt(16) Dt(16) Dt(16) Dt(3) Rg(52) Dt(47) Cb(15) Ss(83) Sh(29) Ss(74) Sh(15) Ss(25) Sh(7) Cm(6) Cm(4) Cm(7) Cm(9) Cm(62) Dt(35) Dt(16) Hi(46) Hi(26) Hi(15) Hi(32) Hi(3) Cm(4) Cm(16) Dt(16) Dt(16) Dt(16) Dt(3) Cm(13) Cb(14) Cb(16) Dt(16) Dt(3) Rg(3) Rg(16) Dt(16) Dt(14) Cb(44) Sh(52) Ep(18) Sh(18) Ep(48) Sh(52) Ep(18) Sh(34) Sh(24) Sh(18) Sh(151) Dt(26) Sh(17) Sh(110) Dt(3) Rg(9) Gi(5) Up(2) Up(2) Up(1) Bn(2) Bn(2) Bn(1) Bn(8) As(6) Gs(2) Gc(1) As(1) As(2) Gc(1) Tg(1) Tg(1) Tg(1) Tg(2) As(4) Gc(1) As(1) As(2) Gc(2) Gc(1) As(1) As(1) Gc(1) GcTREESCODEQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMECONTCALAs 16 Sienna Glen Maple / Acer x freemanii `Sienna` TMB & B 4"CalBn 6 River Birch (Single Stem) / Betula nigraB & B 2.5"CalGi 9 Northern Acclaim Honey Locust / Gleditsia triacanthos inermis `Harve` TM B & B 8"Gs 6Skyline Honey Locust / Gleditsia triacanthos `Skyline`B & B 4"CalGc 14 True North Kentucky Coffeetree / Gymnocladus dioica `UMNSynergy` TM B & B 4"CalTg 4 Greenspire Linden / Tilia cordata `Greenspire`B & B 4"CalUp 12 American Elm / Ulmus americana `Princeton`B & B 4"CalSHRUBSCODEQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMECONTCm 44 Muskingum Dogwood / Cornus racemosa `Muszam`5 galHi 136 Invincibelle Wee White Hydrangea / Hydrangea arborescens `NCHA5` 5 galRg 26 Gro-Low Fragrant Sumac / Rhus aromatica `Gro-Low`5 galSs 59 Sem Ash Leaf Spirea / Sorbaria sorbifolia `Sem`5 galGRASSESCODEQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMECONTCb 88 Korean Feather Reed Grass / Calamagrostis brachytricha1 galDt 634 Tufted Hair Grass / Deschampsia cespitosa `Tardiflora`1 galSh 429 Prairie Dropseed / Sporobolus heterolepis5 galPERENNIALSCODEQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMECONTEp 122 Coneflower / Echinacea purpurea5 galGROUND COVERSCODEQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMECONTS5 2,845 sf SOD xsodSf 3,413 sf STORM FILTRATION PLANTINGSflatPerennial Plugs - Dip IrrigationPanicum Shenandoah (Red Switch Grass)/ P. virgatum `Shenandoah`Blue-Eyed Grass/ Sisyrinchium angustifoliumPLANT SCHEDULECONCRETE PAVINGDECORATIVE PAVING ADECORATIVE PAVING BTURFPLANT BEDSTORM FILTRATION FEATURELANDSCAPE SITE PLAN HATCH LEGEND:LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN1L1.1 20'40'10'0'SCALE:1"=20'PLANNORTHA BC DSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORC O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan, specification,orreport was prepared by me or under mydirectsupervision and that I am a duly licensedlandscape architect under the laws of the Stateof Minnesota10/7/2020 9:06:34 PM 20364MG / JC TM70th & France70th & FranceEdina, MNNORTHTRUENo.Description DateTerry Minarik42422 10-16-2020530 N THIRD ST, SUITE 120,MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55102PH: 612.333.3702 FAX: 515.288.8359www.thinkconfluence.comL1.1LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN PLANNORTHABC DSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORC O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan, specification,orreport was prepared by me or under mydirectsupervision and that I am a duly licensedlandscape architect under the laws of the Stateof Minnesota10/7/2020 9:06:34 PM 20364MG / JC TM70th & France70th & FranceEdina, MNNORTHTRUENo.Description DateTerry Minarik42422 10-16-2020530 N THIRD ST, SUITE 120,MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55102PH: 612.333.3702 FAX: 515.288.8359www.thinkconfluence.comL1.2STREET INTERSECTIONVIGNETTESEAST 71ST STREET DESIGN INTENT01L1.2N.T.S71ST STREET (MIDBLOCK / PLAZA ) INTERSECTION DESIGN INTENT03L1.2N.T.S70TH ST (MIDBLOCK) INTERSECTION DESIGN INTENT02L1.2N.T.SFRANCE AVENUE (MIDBLOCK) INTERSECTION DESIGN INTENT04L1.2N.T.S TURF @ PLANT BED04L2.01-1/2" - 1'-0"FINISHED GRADE AND EDGECONDITION VARIES - SEE PLANFOR CONDITION.3/16" METAL EDGERW/STAKE, PER SPEC.PLANT BED / GRASS MIXAREA MAY OCCUR, SEE PLAN.11EACH TREE SHALL BE PLANTED SUCHTHAT THE ROOT FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THETOP OF THE ROOT BALL. IF THE ROOTFLARE IS NOT VISIBLE, THE SOIL SHALL BEREMOVED IN A LEVEL MANNER FROM THEROOT BALL TO WHERE THE FIRST MAINORDER ROOT (12" DIA. OR LARGER)EMERGES FROM THE TRUNK. SET MAINORDER ROOT 1" HIGHER THAN ADJACENTGRADE. DO NOT COVER TOP OF ROOTBALL WITH SOIL.SCARIFY SIDES OF TREE PIT WITH SPADEBY HAND TO BIND WITH PREPARED SOIL.PLANTING PIT TO BE TWO TO FIVE TIMESTHE DIAMETER OF ROOT ALL, SLOPEDTAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASEFIRMLY WITH FOOT PRESSURE SO THATROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFT.DRAINAGE TRENCH AS REQUIRED PERPERCOLATION TEST IN SPEC. AUGER A 4"DIA. HOLE & FILL W/ 34" GRAVEL.PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED ORCOMPACTED SOIL.DIG PLANTING PIT 4-6" DEEPER THANROOTBALL.UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE.REMOVE BURLAP, WINE, ROPE ANDWIRE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOT BALL.COMPACT PLANTING SOIL TO85% OF MAXIMUM DRY UNITWEIGHT PER ASTM D 698.EDGE CONDITION VARIES, SEEPLAN.4" BUILT-UP EARTH SAUCERBEYOND EDGE OF ROOT BALL.3" SHREDDED HARDWOODMULCH. DO NOT PLACE MULCHIN CONTACT WITH ROOT FLARE.RODENT TRUNK PROTECTIONFOR DECIDUOUS TREES: 12"HARDWIRE-CLOTH MESHCYLINDER. DIMENSIONS: 8"DIAMETER (OR GREATER) X 36"HEIGHT. STAKE IN PLACE,AVOIDING ROOTS. SEE SPEC.TREE PLANTING DETAIL, TYP.01L2.01/2" = 1'-0"SEE PLAN12"MIN.PREPARE SOIL FORTHE ENTIRE BED4"3" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. DONOT PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITHSHRUB STEM.NOTE: SEE SPECIFICATION SECTIONRELATED TO EXTERIOR PLANTING.CONTAINER GROWN MATERIAL SHALLHAVE ROOTS HAND LOOSENED.MIN.4" DEEPER THAN ROOT BALL.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF ENTIREBED WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BIND WITHPLANTING SOIL.UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE.PLANTING DETAIL, TYP.02L2.01/2" = 1'-0"5' DIAMETER MULCH RING, TYP.12"12"12"12"12"PLANSECTION AFILTRATION BASIN SUBGRADE, SEE CIVILPLANTING SOIL MIX, SEE CIVIL FOR DEPTH,3" HARDWOOD MULCHPLUG, SEE MIX FOR SPECIESA'A1/2" SCALESTORM FEATURE PLUG LAYOUT03L2.01/2" = 1'-0"SEE PLAN SEE PLAN SEEPLANSE E PLA N PLANSECTION A'-AA'APLANNORTHABC DSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification,orreport was prepared by me or under mydirectsupervision and that I am a duly licensedlandscape architect under the laws of the Stateof Minnesota10/7/2020 9:06:34 PM 20364MG / JC TM70th & France70th & FranceEdina, MNNORTHTRUENo.Description DateTerry Minarik42422 10-16-2020530 N THIRD ST, SUITE 120,MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55102PH: 612.333.3702 FAX: 515.288.8359www.thinkconfluence.comL2.0LANDSCAPE DETAILS SignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense #DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota10/16/2020 5:47:29 PMA0.1EXISTING SITE IMAGES220535AuthorChecker70th & France70th & FranceEdina, MNPRELIMDEVELOPMENTPLAN SUBMITTAL10/16/2020No. DescriptionDateVIEW FROM SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SITEVIEW FROM EAST SIDE OF SITE LOOKING WESTVIEW FROM SOUTHWEST SIDE OF SITE LOOKING EASTVIEW FROM NORTHEAST CORNER OF SITE LOOKING NORTHVIEW FROM NORTHEAST CORNER OF SITE LOOKING EASTVIEW FROM SOUTH SIDE OF SITE LOOKING SOUTHEAST DN1A0.401A0.41SITE BRETAIL/COMMERCIAL/GROCERSITE ARESIDENTIAL TOWERSITE DBANKSITE CMULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL70TH STREET W 71ST STREET W FRANCE AVE S EWING AVE SDREW AVE S51' - 9"12' - 4"39' - 9"251' - 10"68' - 6"180' - 2"182' - 4"248' - 8"57' - 8"61' - 4"181' - 2"45' - 2"42' - 5"10' - 0"10' - 0"37' - 11"26' - 9"FOR SITE D INFORMATION: REFER TO SHEETS A.010-D, A.020-D, AND A.030-D SignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota10/16/2020 5:47:30 PMA0.2SITE PLAN220535Author Checker70th & France70th & FranceEdina, MNPRELIMDEVELOPMENTPLAN SUBMITTAL10/16/20201" = 20'-0"A0.21ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLANNo. DescriptionDate DN SITE A RESIDENTIAL TOWER EWING AVE SDREW AVE SRESIDENTIAL LOBBY & AMENITY (TO RESIDENTIAL PARKING) RESIDENTIAL PARKING 20 STALLS LOADING TRASH/ RECYCLING RETAIL/FLEX 40 STALLS RAMPUP RAMPDOWN (TO RESIDENTIAL PARKING) MOVE IN UTILITY RETAIL/FLEX SPACE PARKING ENTRY/EXIT PARKING ENTRY/EXIT 182' - 0"248' - 6"RESIDENTIAL PARKING 83 STALLS PER @ LEVEL 3-4 RAMP UP RAMP DOWN RESIDENTIAL UNITS 248' - 6"182' - 0" Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 10/16/2020 6:02:06 PMA0.20-A SITE A FLOOR PLANS 220535 Author Checker 70th & France 70th & France Edina, MN PRELIM DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL 10/16/2020 1/16" = 1'-0"A0.20-A 1 SITE 'A' LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN 1/16" = 1'-0"A0.20-A 2 SITE 'A' LEVEL 2-4 FLOOR PLAN No. Description Date RESIDENTIALAMENITYDECK RESIDENTIAL AMENITY UNOCCUPIABLEROOF AREA 84' - 0"182' - 0" 8' - 0"136' - 0"38' - 0"24' - 6"35' - 0"24' - 6"248' - 6"136' - 0"38' - 0"29' - 6"35' - 0"29' - 6"94' - 0"3' - 0"AMENITY SKYLINE DECK (800 SF) SOUTHERN SUNDECK (2500 SF)29' - 6"35' - 0"29' - 6"64' - 6"8' - 0"135' - 8"12' - 8"25' - 7" 156' - 5" RAMPUP RESIDENTIAL PARKING 108 STALLS @ LEVEL P1 182' - 4"248' - 10"Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 10/16/2020 6:02:07 PMA0.21-A SITE A FLOOR PLANS 220535 Author Checker 70th & France 70th & France Edina, MN PRELIM DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL 10/16/2020 1/16" = 1'-0"A0.21-A 1 LEVEL 5 FLOOR PLAN 1/16" = 1'-0"A0.21-A 2 LEVEL 6-23 FLOOR PLAN1/16" = 1'-0"A0.21-A 3 LEVEL 24 FLOOR PLAN No. Description Date 1/16" = 1'-0"A0.21-A 4 SITE 'A' LEVEL P1 FLOOR PLAN 'A' LEVEL L1 100' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L2 114' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L3 124' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L4 134' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L5 146' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L6 160' - 0" LEVEL L7 170' - 0" TOWER 7 170' - 0" TOWER 8 180' - 0" TOWER 9 190' - 0" TOWER 11 210' - 0" TOWER 12 220' - 0" TOWER 13 230' - 0" TOWER 14 240' - 0" TOWER 15 250' - 0" TOWER 16 260' - 0" TOWER 17 270' - 0" TOWER 18 280' - 0" TOWER 19 290' - 0" TOWER 20 300' - 0" TOWER 21 310' - 0" TOWER 22 320' - 0" TOWER 24 344' - 0" TOWER ROOF UPPER 356' - 0" LEVEL 10 200' - 0" TOWER 23 332' - 0"26' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"14' - 0"12' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"14' - 0"WINDOW WALL PRECAST PANEL (MULTIPLE COLORS) GLASS RAILING WINDOW WALL STONE PANEL PERFORATED METAL PANEL METAL PANEL ILLUMINATED METAL SCREEN COLORED PANEL #1 METAL PANEL STONE PANEL282' - 0"DARK STAINED CONCRETE CONCRETE PANEL #4 TOWER SCREEN WALL 382' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L1 100' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L2 114' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L3 124' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L4 134' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L5 146' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L6 160' - 0" LEVEL L7 170' - 0" TOWER 7 170' - 0" TOWER 8 180' - 0" TOWER 9 190' - 0" TOWER 11 210' - 0" TOWER 12 220' - 0" TOWER 13 230' - 0" TOWER 14 240' - 0" TOWER 15 250' - 0" TOWER 16 260' - 0" TOWER 17 270' - 0" TOWER 18 280' - 0" TOWER 19 290' - 0" TOWER 20 300' - 0" TOWER 21 310' - 0" TOWER 22 320' - 0" TOWER 24 344' - 0" TOWER ROOF UPPER 356' - 0" LEVEL 10 200' - 0"14' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"12' - 0"14' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"26' - 0"TOWER 23 332' - 0" WINDOW WALL PRECAST PANEL (MULTIPLE COLORS) GLASS RAILING STONE PANEL STONE PANEL282' - 0"DARK STAINED CONCRETE WOOD LOOK PANELDARK STAINED CONCRETEMETAL PANEL#1 TOWER SCREEN WALL 382' - 0" Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 10/16/2020 6:02:08 PMA0.30-A SITE A ELEVATIONS 220535 ESG ESG 70th & France 70th & France Edina, MN PRELIM DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL 10/16/2020 1/16" = 1'-0"A0.30-A 1 EAST ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"A0.30-A 2 NORTH ELEVATION No. Description Date 'A' LEVEL L1 100' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L2 114' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L3 124' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L4 134' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L5 146' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L6 160' - 0" LEVEL L7 170' - 0" TOWER 7 170' - 0" TOWER 8 180' - 0" TOWER 9 190' - 0" TOWER 11 210' - 0" TOWER 12 220' - 0" TOWER 13 230' - 0" TOWER 14 240' - 0" TOWER 15 250' - 0" TOWER 16 260' - 0" TOWER 17 270' - 0" TOWER 18 280' - 0" TOWER 19 290' - 0" TOWER 20 300' - 0" TOWER 21 310' - 0" TOWER 22 320' - 0" TOWER 24 344' - 0" TOWER ROOF UPPER 356' - 0" LEVEL 10 200' - 0" TOWER 23 332' - 0" WINDOW WALL CONCRETE PANEL (MULTIPLE COLORS) GLASS RAILING26' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"14' - 0"12' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"14' - 0"282' - 0"PERFORATED METAL PANEL STONE PANELWOOD LOOK PANEL TOWER SCREEN WALL 382' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L1 100' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L2 114' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L3 124' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L4 134' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L5 146' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L6 160' - 0" LEVEL L7 170' - 0" TOWER 7 170' - 0" TOWER 8 180' - 0" TOWER 9 190' - 0" TOWER 11 210' - 0" TOWER 12 220' - 0" TOWER 13 230' - 0" TOWER 14 240' - 0" TOWER 15 250' - 0" TOWER 16 260' - 0" TOWER 17 270' - 0" TOWER 18 280' - 0" TOWER 19 290' - 0" TOWER 20 300' - 0" TOWER 21 310' - 0" TOWER 22 320' - 0" TOWER 24 344' - 0" TOWER ROOF UPPER 356' - 0" LEVEL 10 200' - 0" TOWER 23 332' - 0" WINDOW WALL CONCRETE PANEL (MULTIPLE COLORS) GLASS RAILING 26' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"14' - 0"12' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"14' - 0"282' - 0"WOOD LOOK PANEL ILLUMINATED METAL SCREEN STONE#1 PANELWOOD LOOK PANELPERFERATED METAL PANEL#1CONCRETE PANEL #4METAL PANEL #1 TOWER SCREEN WALL 382' - 0" Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 10/16/2020 6:02:08 PMA0.31-A SITE A ELEVATIONS 220535 Author Checker 70th & France 70th & France Edina, MN PRELIM DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL 10/16/2020 1/16" = 1'-0"A0.31-A 1 SOUTH ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"A0.31-A 2 WEST ELEVATION No. Description Date 2 7 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N 2 8 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N 2 9 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N 3 0 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N 3 2 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N 3 3 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N 3 4 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N 3 5 E S G | A R C H I T E C T U R E & D E S I G N XXXXXXXX WATCTVCTVXX STOSTOSTOSTOSTO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO SANSANSANSANSANSANSAN STOSTO CTVSTO SANSANSANSANSANSANSAN 9/10/2021 11:30:10 AM GASGASGASGASPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUG FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOWATPUGGASGAS CTVCTVFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOPUGTUGPUGPUGSTOSTOSTOSTO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO SANSANSANSANSAN SANSTOSTO820102010TELECOMMUNICATIONS EASEMENTPER DOC. NO. 983149 (ITEM NO. 12)SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTPER DOC. NO. (ITEM NO. 11)1515SCENIC AND OPEN SPACE EASEMENT INFAVOR OF EDINA VILLAGE (NOW CITY) PERDOC. NO. 1033728 (ITEM NO. 14)PUBLIC ROAD EASEMENT IN PER DOC.NO. 1036934 (ITEM NO. 15)4040HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO.2189613 (ITEM NOS. 15 & 16)SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT PERDOC. NOS. T05067233 &T05132844(ITEM NO. 17)9" CLAY @ 0.8%12" RCPXXXXX FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO STOSTO SANSANSANSANSANSAN 9/10/2021 11:30:10 AM XXXXXXX FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO STOSTO SANSANSANSANSANSAN 3 KEY NOTE SYMBOL PARTITION TYPE SYMBOL DETAIL NUMBERING SECTION REFERENCE ELEVATION REFERENCE TYPE PARTITION PARTITION SHEET NO. DETAIL NO. SHEET NO. SHEET NO. DETAIL NO. 1 A10.1 TITLE 1/2" = 1'-0"1 A3.1 1 A3.1 A9.1 1 2 3 4 1 A4.3 SECTION PLAN EXTERIOR ELEVATION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER REFERS TO KEY NOTE LIST NOTE: KEY NOTES DIFFER FROM SHEET TO SHEET SCALE OF DETAIL UNLESS TYPICAL AND INDICATED IN TITLE BLOCK SEQUENTIAL NUMBER FOR LARGE DRAWINGS WHICH DESCRIBES THE DETAIL SEQUENTIAL NUMBERING OF ELEVATION SHEET MOUNTING HEIGHTS DIAGRAM (ACCESSORIES) C3 1 4 2 XX'-X" T.O. XXX EL = XX'-X"ELEVATION REF SPOT ELEVATION REF X REVISION NUMBER FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET FIRE EXTINGUISHER - WALL MOUNTED MISCELLANEOUS SYMBOLS ELEVATION SYMBOLS Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 9/13/2021 8:09:59 PMT1.1 TITLE SHEET 220535 ESG ESG 70th & France 70th & France Edina, MN PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUD 09/13/2021 PROJECT TEAM DRAWING INDEX 70th & France Edina, MN 55435 Site Location DRAWING INDEX DRAWING NUMBER DRAWING NAME 09/13/2021 PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUDARCHITECTURAL SITE A T1.1 TITLE SHEET ● CIVIL C100 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN ● C101 PRELIMINARY PLAT ● C200 SITE PLAN ● C300 GRADING PLAN ● C301 EROSION CONTROL PLAN ● C400 SANITARY AND WATERMAIN PLAN ● C401 STORM SEWER PLAN ● C500 CITY DETAILS ● C501 DETAILS ● LANDSCAPE L1.0 LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN ● L1.0 (2)LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN - RENDERED ● L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN ● L2.0 LANDSCAPE DETAILS ● ARCHITECTURAL A0.1 EXISTING SITE IMAGES ● A0.2 SITE PLAN ● A0.3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - SITE ● A0.4 EXTERIOR RENDERINGS ● ARCHITECTURAL SITE A A0.19-A PRELIMINARY SITE A METRICS ● A0.20-A SITE A FLOOR PLANS ● A0.21-A SITE A FLOOR PLANS ● A0.22-A SITE A FLOOR PLANS ● A0.30-A SITE A ELEVATIONS ● A0.31-A SITE A ELEVATIONS ● A0.40-A SITE A EXTERIOR MATERIALS ● ARCHITECTURAL SITE B A0.20-B SITE B FLOOR PLANS ● A0.21-B SITE B FLOOR PLANS ● A0.22-B SITE B FLOOR PLANS ● A0.30-B SITE B ELEVATIONS ● A0.31-B SITE B ELEVATIONS ● A0.32-B SITE B ELEVATIONS ● A0.33-B SITE B ELEVATIONS ● A0.40-B SITE B EXTERIOR MATERIALS ● OWNER/DEVELOPER:Mortenson Development, Inc. 700 Meadow Lane North Minneapolis, MN 55422 Orion Investments 4530 West 77th Street, Suite 365 Edina, MN 55435 Ph: 612-812-7788 ARCHITECT:Elness Swenson Graham Architects, Inc. 500 Washington Ave. South, Suite 1080 Minneapolis, MN 55415 Ph: 612-339-5508 Fx: 612-339-5382 CONTRACTOR:Mortenson Construction 700 Meadow Lane North Minneapolis, MN 55422 Ph: 763-522-2100 CIVIL ENGINEER:Westwood Engineering 12701 Whitewater Dr #300 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Ph: 952-937-5150 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:Confluence 530 N 3rd Street, Suite 120 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Ph: 612-333-3702 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:T.B.D. MECHANICAL ENGINEER:T.B.D. PLUMBING ENGINEER:T.B.D. ELECTRICAL ENGINEER:T.B.D. SYMBOLS LEGEND FRANCE AVE70TH PROJECT LOCATION Vicinity PROJECT LOCATION No. Description Date GASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGAS GAS GAS PUG PUG PUGPUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUGFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FO FO FOFOFO FO FOPUGPUGPUGPUG WAT WA T WAT PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGGAS GAS GASGASGASCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUG PUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FOFOFOFOTUG TUGPUGPUG PUGPUGPUGPUG PUG PUG PUG PUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUG PUG PUG PUG PUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVXXXGAS GAS GAS FO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO PUGPUGPUGXXX PUG PUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUG26.3CANOPYFFE=872.10FFE=860.05FFE=870.03CANOPYLANDSCAPEEDGE STEPS W/HANDRAILMONUMENTSIGNFFE=860.44BRICKRETAINING WALL CONCRETE RETAINING WALLSTONERETAININGWALL72.711.3 12.022.0 6.140.0 6.097.7 6.33.0 100.13.5 16.23.5 5.925.3 2.116.0 22.424.0 22.432.0 2.013.7131.63.116.35.372.065.844.366.656.211.3 27.34.68.64.58.68.327.2 SAN8.3 EXISTING BRICKBUILDING7001 France Avenue,Edina, MinnesotaBuilding Footprint=24,682 Sq. Ft.STORM GRATEWOOD STEPSFND.TPOSTBLDG. HT.=29.4 FT.TRASHENCLOSURESTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STO STO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO ST OSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN EXISTING BUILDINGTRASHENCLOSURE20.00STOSANSTO STO WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATISLANDSPEDRAMPPED RAMPPED RAMPBITUMINOUS SURFACE BENCH 70.00FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH COUNTY ROAD NO. 17 WEST 70TH STREET110N. LINE OF SEC. 32, TWP. 28, RGE. 24NW CORNER OF SEC. 32,TWP. 28, RGE. 24110W. LINE OF SEC. 32, TWP. 28, RGE. 24 70.008882010 20 10 UTILITY EASEMENT PER THE PLATOF YORKTOWN DOC. NO.1033725 (ITEM NO. 11)22822TELECOMMUNICATIONS EASEMENTPER DOC. NO. 983149 (ITEM NO. 12)SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTPER DOC. NO. (ITEM NO. 11)1520 15SCENIC AND OPEN SPACE EASEMENT INFAVOR OF EDINA VILLAGE (NOW CITY)PER DOC. NO. 1033728 (ITEM NO. 14)SCENIC AND OPEN SPACE EASEMENT INFAVOR OF EDINA VILLAGE (NOW CITY) PERDOC. NO. 1033728 (ITEM NO. 14)1010PUBLIC ROAD EASEMENT IN PER DOC.NO. 1036934 (ITEM NO. 15)STREET RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED IN THE PLAT OFYORKTOWN DOC. NO. 1033725 (ITEM NO. 16)40 40 HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO.2189613 (ITEM NOS. 15 & 16)HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC.NO. 2189613 (ITEM NOS. 15 & 16)PUBLIC STREET, DRAINAGE & UTILITYEASEMENT PER DOC. NO. T4859947(ITEM NO. 16)SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT PERDOC. NOS. T05067233 &T05132844(ITEM NO. 17)SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENTPER DOC. NOS. T05067233 &T05132844 (ITEM NO. 17)TELECOMMUNICATIONSEASEMENT PER DOC. NO.983149 (ITEM NO. 12)11 SPACES 28.27N44°49'18"E 2 HANDICAP SPACES 21 SPACES 10 SPACES 23 SPACES 23 SPACES 22 SPACES 16 SPACES 18 SPACES 9 SPACES 4 HANDICAP SPACES 2 SPACES 5 SPACES 12 SPACES 12 SPACES 15 SPACESBACK OF CURB IS 0.4 S.OF PROPERTY LINEBACK OF CURB IS0.1 S. AND 0.7 E.OF PROPERTY LINEBACK OF CURB IS 0.8 E. OF PROPERTY LINE BACK OF CURB ONPROPERTY LINE 100.9583.42 BACK OF CURB IS 2.9SE OF PROPERTY LINEBACK OF CURB 0.2 E. OFPROPERTY LINE N89°50'44"E 505.00S00°11'54"E 496.57S89°48'06"W 524.96N00°12'08"W 476.97 EEEEEEEEEEEACACMGGGGTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTTVTVHHTTVAULT-SUMP PUMPLIFT STATION (LOCKED)TTRIM=857.7INV(NE)=856.6INV(S)=856.5STOSTOSTOSTORIM=871.0FULL OFDEBRISRIM=870.6INV(E)=866.4INV(NE)-866.3RIM=871.6INV(E)=865.1INV(W)=864.9INV(S)=866.1RIM=869.1INV(E)=864.5RIM=868.3INV(N/E)=864.3INV(W)=863.6RIM=866.7INV(N)=862.7INV(S)=863.0INV(E/W)=862.6RIM=866.5INV(N)=862.6INV(E)=862.5INV(W)=861.7RIM=871.5INV(E)=867.215"RCPRIM=867.5INV=863.2RIM=857.1INV=856.6RIM=857.2INV=856.7RIM=868.4INV=857.9RIM = 862.97IE = 855.15 (CITY AS-BUILT)RIM=859.4INV=856.7SGREY WATERRIM=864.3INV=857.8RIM=860.0INV=858.1RIM=866.8INV(E)=859.4INV(W)=859.1RIM=862.9INV=860.112" RCPRIM=862.8INV(NE)=859.0INV(E/S)=857.5RIM=862.8INV(N)=857.2INV(E)=859.2INV(SE)=857.5INV(SW)=856.3RIM=866.3INV=859.6RIM=865.4INV=860.1RIM=865.9INV=860.5RIM=864.9INV=860.3RIM=866.2INV=863.3RIM=869.5FULLOFWATERRIM=871.1INV=868.015" CLAYRIM=863.4FULL OF ICE & DEBRISRIM=863.1INV(NE)=859.6INV(W)=859.1RIM=861.2INV=858.112" RCPRIM=861.8INV(E)=857.7INV(W)=858.2INV(S)=857.6RIM=862.1INV=857.912" RCPRIM=871.2INV=865.4RIM=871.1INV(N)=864.2INV(SW)=864.1RIM=871.3INV=861.6RIM=870.6INV=860.3RIM=862.5INV(N)=852.8INV(S)=852.6RIM=868.6INV(N)=858.4INV(W)=858.2SSANS15" RCP21" RCPS15" RCP 12" RCP21" RCP12" RCP21" RCP9" CLAY @ 0.8%24" RCP24" RCP24" RCP12" RCP15" CONC15" RCP12" RCP 15" RCP8"PVC 8" CLAY8" CAST IRON12" CLAY 8" CLAY10" CLAY 8" CLAY10" CLAY12"RCP ST-5ST-6ST-4ST-3ST-2ST-116" ASH13" LCH14" SPNDEAD16" LCH14" SPN12" SPN18" SPN14" LCH18" SPN14" ASH14" SPN2" ASH16" SPN14" SPN14" SPN10" ASH10" ASH8" ASH14" ASH14" ASH20" ASH13" ASH17" ASH10" ASH13" ASH15" LCH12" ASH9" ASH12" ASH10" ASH15" ASH12" ASH 10" ASH15" ASH8" ASH8" ASH12" ASH15" ASH12" ASH7" ASH8" ASH12" ASH 6" ASH14" ASH4" SPC4" SPC5" SPC5" SPCMULTI-BIRCHMULTI-BIRCHMULTI-BIRCHMULTI-BIRCHMULTI-CRB MULTI-CRB27" ASH2" OAK 15" LCH14" SPN10" SPN12" SPN10" SPN18" SPN16" SPN16" SPN12" LCH14" LCH14" LCH16" LCH20" LCH18" FRT4" ASH4" ASH4" ASH12" ASH 12" ASH 12" ASH 12" ASH GW: 852.7GW: 853.5GW: 857.5GW: 848.6GW: NOT OBSERVEDGW: NOT OBSERVEDST-101GW: 852.9ST-102GW: 853.5ST-103GW: 853.5ST-104GW: 854.6ST-105GW: NOT OBSERVEDST-106GW: 853.4ST-107GW: NOT OBSERVEDST-108GW: NOT OBSERVEDFRANCE AVENUE SOUTH COUNTY ROAD NO. 1715" RCP18" RCP15" RCPSTOSTOSTO XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \\\\\ \\\\\\\\\************************XXXXXX\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\X\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\ \ \ \ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\222222222\\\\\\\\\\\\233144444444455666666666666666778444SHEET NUMBER:DATE:DATE:LICENSE NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA VERTICAL SCALE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: DRAWN: CHECKED: DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE: REVISIONS:PREPARED FOR: Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 N:\0029211.10\DWG\CIVIL\0029211.10RM01.DWG EDINA, MN09/13/202170TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTEXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN 70TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTC100 .09/13/2021 DAVID T. BADE . . . 10/16/2020 4530 WEST 77TH STREET SUITE #365 EDINA, MN 55435 ORION/MORTENSON Œ:HVWZRRG3URIHVVLRQDO6HUYLFHV,QFCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com### ### or ## 01/25/2021 02/26/2021 06/10/2021 09/13/2021 . US BANK FINAL DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL WATERSHED COMMENTS CLIENT REVISION PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUD .PROJECT NUMBER: 0029211.10PROPERTY LINE\\\\\\CURB & GUTTERSAW CUT PAVEMENTSANSANITARY SEWERWATWATER MAINSTOSTORM SEWERCONCRETEBITUMINOUSBUILDINGTREELIGHT POLETRAFFIC SIGNEXISTINGPROPOSEDSANWATSTOCONSTRUCTION BARRICADEWATHYDRANTWATGASGASGASPUGUNDERGROUND ELECTRICPUGTUGUNDERGROUND TELEPHONETUGPOHOVERHEAD ELECTRICPOHTOHOVERHEAD TELEPHONETOHFOTELEPHONE FIBER OPTICFOCTVCABLE TELEVISIONCTVRETAINING WALLFENCEXSOIL BORING LOCATIONSB-19TREE LINEXEXISTINGREMOVALS\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\REMOVAL LEGEND1. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THISPLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITYLOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIEDIMMEDIATELY IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE LIMITS OF REMOVALS WITH PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTSAND FIELD VERIFY CONDITION OF EXISTING APPURTENANCES TO REMAIN. CONTRACTORSHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING OR REPLACING MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (SUCH ASFENCES, SIGNS, IRRIGATION HEADS, ETC.) THAT MAY BE DAMAGED BY CONSTRUCTION.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE ALL NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES REQUIRED TOMAINTAIN SITE STABILITY PRIOR TO EXECUTING ANY SITE REMOVALS.4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION WITH UTILITY PROVIDERS FORREMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AFFECTED BY SITE DEVELOPMENT. ALLPERMITS, APPLICATIONS AND FEES ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.REMOVAL NOTESSSX*XXXNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION0'30'60'90'1" = 30'1. SAW CUT LINE2. REMOVE BITUMINOUS3. EXISTING BITUMINOUS TO REMAIN4. REMOVE CONCRETE5. REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING6. REMOVE CURB7. REMOVE RETAINING WALL8. REMOVE MONUMENT SIGNREMOVAL KEYNOTES1TREES TO BE REMOVED: 72TREES TO REMAIN: 4TOTAL TREES: 76TREE REMOVAL QUANTITIES XXXXXX WEST 70TH STREETFRANCE AVENUE SOUTH COUNTY ROAD NO. 17 XXXSANSANSANSANSANSANFRANCE AVENUE SOUTH COUNTY ROAD NO. 17 WEST 70TH STREETRIM=868.4INV=857.9S8" CLAY14" SPN14" ASH20" ASH13" ASH17" ASH12" ASH7" ASH 8" ASH12" ASH 4" SPC4" SPC5" SPC5" SPCMULTI-CRB27" ASHFRANCE AVENUE SOUTH COUNTY ROAD NO. 17 GFE = 856.00GFE = 860.00GFE = 860.75GFE = 857.00TPROPOSED FINANCIALINSTITUTIONFOOTPRINT = 6,200 SFFFE = 866.00XXXXXLOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 48882010 20 10UTILITY EASEMENT PERTHE PLAT OF YORKTOWNDOC. NO. 103372522822TELECOMMUNICATIONSEASEMENT PER DOC.NO. 983149SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTPER DOC. NO. 1033725 152020 15SCENIC AND OPEN SPACEEASEMENT IN FAVOR OFEDINA VILLAGE (NOW CITY)PER DOC. NO. 1033728SCENIC AND OPEN SPACE EASEMENTIN FAVOR OF EDINA VILLAGE (NOWCITY) PER DOC. NO. 103372810 10PUBLIC ROAD EASEMENTIN PER DOC. NO. 1036934 HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 2189613 HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 2189613PUBLIC STREET, DRAINAGE & UTILITYEASEMENT PER DOC. NO. T4859947SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT PERDOC. NOS. T05067233 &T05132844 SIDEWALK & UTILITYEASEMENT PER DOC.NOS. T05067233 &T05132844TELECOMMUNICATIONSEASEMENT PER DOC.NO. 9831491ƒ ( 1ƒ (1ƒ (274.92250.06264.54260.44250.62274.34245.71259.28163.93 313.04 334.45162.12 PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT(BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT)PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT (BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT)PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT(BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT)PROPOSED ROAD EASEMENT (BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT)303028.5 20 8.5 161628.5 20 8.5S89°48'06"W 524.96N00°12'08"W 476.97 28.27N44°49'18"E N89°50'44"E 505.00S00°11'54"E 496.57 PROPOSED ROAD EASEMENT (BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT)SHEET NUMBER:DATE:DATE:LICENSE NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA VERTICAL SCALE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: DRAWN: CHECKED: DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE: REVISIONS:PREPARED FOR: Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 N:\0029211.10\DWG\CIVIL\0029211.10PP01.DWG EDINA, MN10/16/2070TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTPRELIMINARY PLAT 70TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTC101 4587310/16/20 Nathan H. Carlson . NHC BJY 10/16/20 4530 WEST 77TH STREET SUITE #365 EDINA, MN 55435 ORION/MORTENSONNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONŒ:HVWZRRG3URIHVVLRQDO6HUYLFHV,QFCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com0'30'60'90'1" = 30'30' 6' or 3' 01/25/2021 02/26/2021 06/10/2021 09/13/2021 . US BANK FINAL DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL WATERSHED COMMENTS CLIENT REVISION PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUD .PROJECT NUMBER: 0029211.10LOT 12.02 AC.LOT AREA(ACRE)LEGALDESCRIPTIONOFFICE/GROCERYPROPOSED USELOT 21.99 AC.MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIALLOT 30.93 AC.SENIOR HOUSINGLOT 41.03 AC.BANKSITE DATA CHARTOrion/Mortenson4530 West 77th St., Ste. 365Edina, MN 55435OWNER / SUBDIVIDERENGINEERWESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES12701 WHITEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 300,MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55343Phone: 952-937-5150ZONINGEXISTING: PCD-3 - PLANNED COMMERCIALPROPOSED: PUD - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTTOTAL5.97 AC. XXXFND.TPOST20.00FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH COUNTY ROAD NO. 17 WEST 70TH STREET8882010 20 10 UTILITY EASEMENT PER THE PLATOF YORKTOWN DOC. NO.1033725 (ITEM NO. 11)22822TELECOMMUNICATIONS EASEMENTPER DOC. NO. 983149 (ITEM NO. 12)SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTPER DOC. NO. (ITEM NO. 11)1520 15SCENIC AND OPEN SPACE EASEMENT INFAVOR OF EDINA VILLAGE (NOW CITY)PER DOC. NO. 1033728 (ITEM NO. 14)SCENIC AND OPEN SPACE EASEMENT INFAVOR OF EDINA VILLAGE (NOW CITY) PERDOC. NO. 1033728 (ITEM NO. 14)1010PUBLIC ROAD EASEMENT IN PER DOC.NO. 1036934 (ITEM NO. 15)STREET RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED IN THE PLAT OFYORKTOWN DOC. NO. 1033725 (ITEM NO. 16)40 40 HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO.2189613 (ITEM NOS. 15 & 16)HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC.NO. 2189613 (ITEM NOS. 15 & 16)PUBLIC STREET, DRAINAGE & UTILITYEASEMENT PER DOC. NO. T4859947(ITEM NO. 16)SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT PERDOC. NOS. T05067233 &T05132844(ITEM NO. 17)SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENTPER DOC. NOS. T05067233 &T05132844 (ITEM NO. 17)TELECOMMUNICATIONSEASEMENT PER DOC. NO.983149 (ITEM NO. 12)ST-5ST-6ST-4ST-3ST-2ST-116" ASH13" LCH14" ASHGW: 852.7GW: 853.5GW: 857.5GW: 848.6GW: NOT OBSERVEDGW: NOT OBSERVEDST-101GW: 852.9ST-102GW: 853.5ST-103GW: 853.5ST-104GW: 854.6ST-105GW: NOT OBSERVEDST-106GW: 853.4ST-107GW: NOT OBSERVEDST-108GW: NOT OBSERVEDFRANCE AVENUE SOUTH COUNTY ROAD NO. 17 COMMERCIAL/RETAIL SPACEFOOTPRINT = 47,200 SFFFE (HOSPITALITY) = 870.00FFE (OFFICE LOBBY) = 868.00FFE (LOADING DOCK) = 866.00MULTI-FAMILY HOUSINGBUILDING FOOTPRINT = 44,300 SFFFE (RESIDENTIAL) = 870.75PARKING RAMPFFE = 866.50GFE = 856.00GFE = 860.00GFE = 860.75GFE = 857.00TPROPOSED FINANCIALINSTITUTIONFOOTPRINT = 6,200 SFFFE = 866.00XXXXXLOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 410'8.5' (TYP.)24'24'24'24'24'9'8.5'R10'R10'R10'R30'R20'R200'R224'R146'R123'R40'20'8.5'16.33'8.5'14.67'24'35.72'182.0'109.5'74.7'29.3'51.0'13.3'33.2'25.5'34.8'13.9'42.5'AAAABBA56'25.5'1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A22555556D1B51B78888888888889A9A9A9A9A11111111111111111111131313134348488A8A8A9A8A8A8AEBB212110.9'12.5'12.0'8.7'10.0'8.0'S.1S.1S.4S.2S.1S.4S.1S.4S.2S.3S.4S.1S.4S.1S.4S.3S.3R20'R20'20'8.5'16.33'8.5'14.67'20'8.5'16.33'8.5'14.67'R20'R20'24'25.5'SHEET NUMBER:DATE:DATE:LICENSE NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA VERTICAL SCALE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: DRAWN: CHECKED: DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE: REVISIONS:PREPARED FOR: Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 N:\0029211.10\DWG\CIVIL\0029211.10SP01.DWG EDINA, MN09/13/202170TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTSITE PLAN 70TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTC200 .09/13/2021 DAVID T. BADE . . . 10/16/2020 4530 WEST 77TH STREET SUITE #365 EDINA, MN 55435 ORION/MORTENSONNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONŒ:HVWZRRG3URIHVVLRQDO6HUYLFHV,QFCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com0'30'60'90'1" = 30'30' 6' or 3' 01/25/2021 02/26/2021 06/10/2021 09/13/2021 . US BANK FINAL DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL WATERSHED COMMENTS CLIENT REVISION PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUD .PROJECT NUMBER: 0029211.10S.1S.10S.2S.3REFERENCESTOP SIGNS.4NO TRUCKSRIGHT LANE MUST TURN RIGHTPEDESTRIAN CROSSING1A B612 CURB AND GUTTER1B B618 CURB AND GUTTER2 SURMOUNTABLE CURB AND GUTTER5 VALLEY GUTTER6 CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER7 ENTRANCE THRU CURB AND GUTTER8 PRIVATE CONCRETE SIDEWALK8A PUBLIC CONCRETE SIDEWALK9 PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP9A PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP11 CROSS WALK STRIPING13 TRAFFIC ARROW14 SIGN INSTALLATION19 PAVEMENT SECTIONS21 HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE SECTION22 SAW CUT CONTROL JOINT24 CONCRETE CURB AT SIDEWALK31 TRANSITION CURB (B612)43 RETAINING WALL WITH FENCE USING SLEEVE-IT SYSTEM45 B612 AND SURMOUNTABLE CURB TRANSITION48 CONCRETE STAIR AND RAILING DETAIL1·EXISTING ZONING:PDC-3, PLANNED COMMERCIAL·PROPOSED ZONING:PUD - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT·PARCEL DESCRIPTION:LOT 1, BLOCK 1, YORKTOWN, HENNEPINCOUNTY, MINNESOTA·PROPERTY AREA:260,594 SF (5.98 AC)·PERVIOUS SURFACE:71,861 SF (27.6%)·IMPERVIOUS SURFACE(RATIO):188,733 SF (72.4%)·FLOOR-AREA-RATIO(FAR):SEE ARCH PLANS·BUILDING SETBACK PER CODE:XX'=FRONTXX'=SIDE / XX'=SIDE TO ROWXX'=REARLOT 1BLDG FOOTPRINTAREA(SF)LOT AREA(ACRE)LEGALDESCRIPTION51,600PROPOSED USELOT 2LOT 3LOT 4TOTAL5.98 AC.123,050-44,30021,0506,100SIGN LEGENDSITE DETAILS (SI-0XX)SITE DEVELOPMENT SUMMARYSITE DATA CHART1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR THIS PROJECT PROVIDED BY WESTWOOD PROFESSIONALSERVICES, MINNETONKA, MN, 2020.2. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THISPLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITYLOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND, THEENGINEER SHOULD BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY.3. REFER TO BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR LOT BEARINGS, DIMENSIONS AND AREAS.4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB OR EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.5. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OFEXITS, RAMPS, AND TRUCK DOCKS.6. ALL CURB RADII ARE SHALL BE 5.0 FEET (TO FACE OF CURB) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. ALL CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFICCONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGGERSAND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OFTHESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY AND ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT.TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS.9. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SECTIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THERECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURINGCONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TOADJACENT PROPERTIES.11. SITE LIGHTING SHOWN ON PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN PREPAREDBY OTHERS FOR SITE LIGHTING DETAILS AND PHOTOMETRICS.GENERAL SITE NOTESPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEEASEMENT LINECURB AND GUTTERLOT LINEPOND NORMAL WATER LEVELRETAINING WALLCONCRETE PAVEMENTNUMBER OF PARKING STALLSTRANSFORMERSITE LIGHTINGEXISTINGPROPOSEDFENCEXXHEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTNORMAL DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTTRAFFIC SIGNPOWER POLEBOLLARD / POSTCONCRETE SIDEWALKTIP-OUT CURB AND GUTTERSITE LEGEND5T 2.02 AC.OFFICE/GROCERY1.99 AC.MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL0.93 AC.SENIOR HOUSING1.03 AC.BANKA. PLANTER CURB (TYP.)B. CONCRETE PAVERS (TYP.)C. GENERATORD. EXISTING SURMOUNTABLE CURB IN ROUNDABOUTE. BIKE LANE EXIT RAMP ONTO SHARED SIDEWALKSITE KEYNOTESX 865 8708708708708708 7 0 8758 7 5 862 863 864 866 86786786786886886886986986986 9 871 871 87187187187 1 871871872872872 8 7 2 8728728738 7 3 8748 7 4 860860865865 865865870870858858859859861861862862863863864864864 864866866866866867867867 867868868868868869869871870870867867868 8 6 9 869860 870859 859 861862863864 867868869871872870866867868869871861862863864865862863864 866 867867 COMMERCIAL/RETAIL SPACEFOOTPRINT = 47,200 SFFFE (HOSPITALITY) = 870.00FFE (OFFICE LOBBY) = 868.00FFE (LOADING DOCK) = 866.00MULTI-FAMILY HOUSINGBUILDING FOOTPRINT = 44,300 SFFFE (RESIDENTIAL) = 870.75PARKING RAMPFFE = 866.50GFE = 856.00GFE = 860.00GFE = 860.75GFE = 857.00PROPOSED FINANCIALINSTITUTIONFOOTPRINT = 6,200 SFFFE = 866.00XXXXXGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGAS GAS GAS PUG PUG PUGPUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUGFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FO FO FOFOFO FO FOPUGPUGPUGPUG WAT PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGGAS GAS CTVCTV CTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVFO FO FO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FO FO FO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FOPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FOFOFOFOTUGPUGPUG PUGPUGPUGPUG PUG PUG PUG PUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUG PUG PUG PUG PUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVXXXFO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOPUGPUGPUGFND.TPOSTSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STO STOSTO ST OSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSANSANSANSANSAN20.00STOSANSTO STO WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATFRANCE AVENUE SOUTH COUNTY ROAD NO. 17 WEST 70TH STREET8882010 20 10 UTILITY EASEMENT PER THE PLATOF YORKTOWN DOC. NO.1033725 (ITEM NO. 11)22822TELECOMMUNICATIONS EASEMENTPER DOC. NO. 983149 (ITEM NO. 12)SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTPER DOC. NO. (ITEM NO. 11)1520 15SCENIC AND OPEN SPACE EASEMENT INFAVOR OF EDINA VILLAGE (NOW CITY)PER DOC. NO. 1033728 (ITEM NO. 14)SCENIC AND OPEN SPACE EASEMENT INFAVOR OF EDINA VILLAGE (NOW CITY) PERDOC. NO. 1033728 (ITEM NO. 14)1010PUBLIC ROAD EASEMENT IN PER DOC.NO. 1036934 (ITEM NO. 15)STREET RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED IN THE PLAT OFYORKTOWN DOC. NO. 1033725 (ITEM NO. 16)40 40 HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO.2189613 (ITEM NOS. 15 & 16)HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC.NO. 2189613 (ITEM NOS. 15 & 16)PUBLIC STREET, DRAINAGE & UTILITYEASEMENT PER DOC. NO. T4859947(ITEM NO. 16)SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT PERDOC. NOS. T05067233 &T05132844(ITEM NO. 17)SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENTPER DOC. NOS. T05067233 &T05132844 (ITEM NO. 17)TELECOMMUNICATIONSEASEMENT PER DOC. NO.983149 (ITEM NO. 12)EEEEEEEEEEMGTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTTVTVHHTTTTSTOSTOSTOSTORIM=871.0FULL OFDEBRISRIM=870.6INV(E)=866.4INV(NE)-866.3RIM=871.6INV(E)=865.1INV(W)=864.9INV(S)=866.1RIM=869.1INV(E)=864.5RIM=868.3INV(N/E)=864.3INV(W)=863.6RIM=866.7INV(N)=862.7INV(S)=863.0INV(E/W)=862.6RIM=866.5INV(N)=862.6INV(E)=862.5INV(W)=861.7RIM=871.5INV(E)=867.215"RCPRIM=867.5INV=863.2RIM = 862.97IE = 855.15 (CITY AS-BUILT)RIM=866.8INV(E)=859.4INV(W)=859.1RIM=862.8INV(N)=857.2INV(E)=859.2INV(SE)=857.5INV(SW)=856.3RIM=866.2INV=863.3RIM=869.5FULLOFWATERRIM=871.1INV=868.0RIM=863.4FULL OF ICE & DEBRISRIM=863.1INV(NE)=859.6INV(W)=859.1RIM=861.2INV=858.112" RCPRIM=861.8INV(E)=857.7INV(W)=858.2INV(S)=857.6RIM=862.1INV=857.912" RCPRIM=862.5INV(N)=852.8INV(S)=852.615" RCP21" RCPS12" RCP21" RCP12" RCP21" RCP9" CLAY @ 0.8%24" RCP24" RCP24" RCP12" RCP 8"PVC 12"RCPST-5ST-6ST-4ST-3ST-2ST-116" ASH13" LCH14" ASHGW: 852.7GW: 853.5GW: 857.5GW: 848.6GW: NOT OBSERVEDGW: NOT OBSERVEDST-101GW: 852.9ST-102GW: 853.5ST-103GW: 853.5ST-104GW: 854.6ST-105GW: NOT OBSERVEDST-106GW: 853.4ST-107GW: NOT OBSERVEDST-108GW: NOT OBSERVED15" RCPSTOSTOSTO871.83870.00870.20867.50870.00869.20869.11868.80867.68866.96866.77866.63866.42865.35870.00870.00868.00867.00870.20870.68870.71870.70870.75870.15866.22865.36865.53866.50866.50865.60864.60870.59E.O.F.864.72867.00869.42E.O.F.867.65E.O.F.867.60E.O.F.866.20E.O.F.866.61866.71866.37869.51870.77870.00870.00868.50867868869868.04866866866867870868869SHEET NUMBER:DATE:DATE:LICENSE NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA VERTICAL SCALE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: DRAWN: CHECKED: DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE: REVISIONS:PREPARED FOR: Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 N:\0029211.10\DWG\CIVIL\0029211.10GD01.DWG EDINA, MN09/13/202170TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTGRADING PLAN 70TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTC300 .09/13/2021 DAVID T. BADE . . . 10/16/2020 4530 WEST 77TH STREET SUITE #365 EDINA, MN 55435 ORION/MORTENSON Œ:HVWZRRG3URIHVVLRQDO6HUYLFHV,QFCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com### ### or ## 01/25/2021 02/26/2021 06/10/2021 09/13/2021 . US BANK FINAL DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL WATERSHED COMMENTS CLIENT REVISION PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUD .PROJECT NUMBER: 0029211.10PROPERTY LINE982980POND NORMAL WATER LEVELRIDGE LINETOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALLEMERGENCY OVERFLOWSB-19SOIL BORING LOCATIONSTOSTORM SEWERDRAIN TILEWATER MAINSANITARY SEWEREXISTINGPROPOSEDINDEX CONTOURINTERVAL CONTOUR982980WATSANSPOT ELEVATIONFLOW DIRECTIONSB-19RETAINING WALLGRADING LIMITSGLCURB AND GUTTERFLARED END SECTION (WITH RIPRAP)GRADING LEGEND1. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THISPLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITYLOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIEDIMMEDIATELY IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND.2. CONTRACTORS SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS ANDDIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULE, SLOPED PAVEMENT, EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISEBUILDING DIMENSIONS, EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS, AND EXACTLOCATIONS AND NUMBER OF DOWNSPOUTS.3. ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARDSPECIFICATIONS FOR TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL/SURFACE RESTORATION" ASPREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA.4. ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE FOUR INCHES OF TOPSOIL AND SOD OR SEED.THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. SEELANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PLANTING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT.5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFICCONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMENAND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OFTHESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFICCONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS.6. ALL SLOPES SHALL BE GRADED TO 3:1 OR FLATTER, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THISSHEET.7. CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING AND PROVIDE ASMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITH UNIFORM SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONSARE SHOWN OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES.8. SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN INDICATE FINISHED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS & GUTTER FLOWLINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACEGRADE.9. SEE SOILS REPORT FOR PAVEMENT THICKNESSES AND HOLD DOWNS.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ANY EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL THAT EXISTS AFTER THE SITEGRADING AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OFALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL IN A MANNER ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER AND THE REGULATINGAGENCIES.11. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL RETAINING WALL DESIGN CERTIFIED BY ALICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER.12. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL RULES INCLUDING THENATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.13. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY STRUCTURE OR PAVEMENT, A PROOF ROLL, AT MINIMUM, WILLBE REQUIRED ON THE SUBGRADE. PROOF ROLLING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MAKINGMINIMUM OF 2 COMPLETE PASSES WITH FULLY-LOADED TANDEM-AXLE DUMP TRUCK, ORAPPROVED EQUAL, IN EACH OF 2 PERPENDICULAR DIRECTIONS WHILE UNDER SUPERVISIONAND DIRECTION OF THE INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY. AREAS OF FAILURE SHALL BEEXCAVATED AND RE-COMPACTED AS SPECIFIED HEREIN.14. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL PLACED BENEATH BUILDINGS AND STREET OR PARKING AREAS SHALLBE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFIED DENSITY METHOD AS OUTLINED INMNDOT 2105.3F1 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.15. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL NOT PLACED IN THE BUILDING PAD, STREETS OR PARKING AREA,SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDINARYCOMPACTION METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MNDOT 2105.3F2.16. ALL SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENTGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE ORUNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. THECONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS ANDINSPECTIONS WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.1. BASIN EXCAVATION AND PIPE INSTALLATION MAY TAKE PLACE BEFORE CURB INSTALLATION.ALL OTHER BASIN CONSTRUCTION MUST WAIT UNTIL FINAL SITE LANDSCAPING. REMOVESEDIMENT FROM EXCAVATED BASIN PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF FILTER MEDIA. PLACE SANDBAGS OR SIMILAR ITEM IN CURB CUTS TO PRE-FILTER STORM WATER UNTIL PLANTS AREESTABLISHED IN BASINS. MAINTAIN INLET PROTECTION ON DOWN STREAM INLETS UNTILBASINS ARE ON-LINE.2. BASIN EXCAVATION SHALL BE WITH TOOTHED-BUCKETS TO SCARIFY THE BOTTOM.3. PLACE SILT FENCE AROUND BASINS AS SHOWN IMMEDIATELY AFTER BASIN CONSTRUCTION.4. BASINS MUST BE TESTED FOR INFILTRATION RATE AFTER TOTAL SITE STABILIZATION. A DUALRING INFILTROMETER SHALL BE USED FOR TESTING. MINIMUM INFILTRATION RATE IS 1-INCHPER HOUR. IF BASIN DOES NOT MEET INFILTRATION RATE, CONTRACTOR MUST TAKECORRECTIVE ACTION UNTIL MINIMUM INFILTRATION RATE IS MET. CORRECTIVE ACTION MAYINCLUDE REMOVING PLUG IN DRAIN TILE. ALL TESTING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION SHALL BETHE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR, AND SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONTRACT,WITH NO DIRECT COMPENSATION MADE.GRADING NOTESFILTRATION/INFILTRATION BASIN NOTES0.00%900.00900.00TW=XXX.XXBW=XXX.XXE.O.F.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION0'30'60'90'1" = 30'GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATIONS FOUND A LAYER OF CLAYEY SAND APPROXIMATELY 4 FEET BELOWTHE BOTTOM OF THE PROPOSED INFILTRATION CHAMBERS. SHOULD THIS MATERIAL BEENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE EXISTING CLAYEY SAND MUST BE REMOVED ANDREPLACED WITH MATERIAL HAVING AN INFILTRATION RATE COMPARABLE WITH THEPOORLY-GRADED SAND LOCATED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SYSTEM.SOIL REPLACEMENT NOTE 865 8708708708708708 7 0 8758 7 5 862 863 864 866 86786786786886886886986986986 9 871 871 87187187187 1 871871872872872 8 7 2 8728728738 7 3 8748 7 4 860860865865 865865870870858858859859861861862862863863864864864 864866866866866867867867 867868868868868869869871870870867867868 8 6 9 869860 870859 859 861862863864 867868869871872870866867868869871861862863864865862863864 866 867867 TUG XXXFND.TPOSTSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STO STOSTO ST OSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOFRANCE AVENUE SOUTH COUNTY ROAD NO. 17 WEST 70TH STREETEEEEEEEEEEMGTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTTVTVHHTTTTSTOSTOSTOSTOSST-5ST-6ST-4ST-3ST-2ST-116" ASH13" LCH14" ASHGW: 852.7GW: 853.5GW: 857.5GW: 848.6GW: NOT OBSERVEDGW: NOT OBSERVEDST-101GW: 852.9ST-102GW: 853.5ST-103GW: 853.5ST-104GW: 854.6ST-105GW: NOT OBSERVEDST-106GW: 853.4ST-107GW: NOT OBSERVEDST-108GW: NOT OBSERVEDSTOSTOSTOCOMMERCIAL/RETAIL SPACEFOOTPRINT = 47,200 SFFFE (HOSPITALITY) = 870.00FFE (OFFICE LOBBY) = 868.00FFE (LOADING DOCK) = 866.00MULTI-FAMILY HOUSINGBUILDING FOOTPRINT = 44,300 SFFFE (RESIDENTIAL) = 870.75PARKING RAMPFFE = 866.50GFE = 856.00GFE = 860.00GFE = 860.75GFE = 857.00PROPOSED FINANCIALINSTITUTIONFOOTPRINT = 6,200 SFFFE = 866.00XXXXX871.83ROCKCONSTRUCTIONENTRANCESFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFINLET PROTECTION (TYP.)SILT FENCESILT FENCESILT FENCESILT FENCEINLET PROTECTION (TYP.)ROCK LOG INLET PROTECTIONSHEET NUMBER:DATE:DATE:LICENSE NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA VERTICAL SCALE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: DRAWN: CHECKED: DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE: REVISIONS:PREPARED FOR: Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 N:\0029211.10\DWG\CIVIL\0029211.10EC01.DWG EDINA, MN09/13/202170TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTEROSION CONTROL PLAN 70TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTC301 .09/13/2021 DAVID T. BADE DTB DTB TDM 10/16/2020 4530 WEST 77TH STREET SUITE #365 EDINA, MN 55435 ORION/MORTENSON Œ:HVWZRRG3URIHVVLRQDO6HUYLFHV,QFCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com### ### or ## 01/25/2021 02/26/2021 06/10/2021 09/13/2021 . US BANK FINAL DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL WATERSHED COMMENTS CLIENT REVISION PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUD .PROJECT NUMBER: 0029211.10NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION0'30'60'90'1" = 30'PROPERTY LINESILT FENCEPOND NORMAL WATER LEVELROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEROSION CONTROL BLANKETEMERGENCY OVERFLOWSOIL BORING LOCATIONSTORM SEWERDRAIN TILEWATER MAINSANITARY SEWERINLET PROTECTIONEXISTINGPROPOSEDINDEX CONTOURINTERVAL CONTOURRETAINING WALLSFGRADING LIMITSCURB AND GUTTERFLARED END SECTION (WITH RIPRAP)TURF REINFORCEMENT MATEROSION CONTROL LEGEND1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OFEXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUSUTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATIONSHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFYEXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OFDISCREPANCIES.2. ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN-PLACE PRIOR TO ANYEXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL VIABLE TURF OR GROUNDCOVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILT FENCE ON-SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND ORREMOVED AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OFEXTREME IMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELD CONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TOEROSION CONTROL. TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAYBALES, ETC., REQUIRED BY THE CITYSHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT.3. EROSION AND SILTATION CONTROL (ESC): THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME COMPLETERESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTROLLING ALL SILTATION AND EROSION OF THE PROJECT AREA. THECONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY TO CONTROL THE EROSION ANDSILTATION INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: CATCH BASIN INSERTS, CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCES, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, AND SILT FENCE. ESC SHALL COMMENCE WITHGRADING AND CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK BYTHE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY INCLUDES ALL IMPLEMENTATION ASREQUIRED TO PREVENT EROSION AND THE DEPOSITING OF SILT. THE OWNER MAY DIRECT THECONTRACTOR'S METHODS AS DEEMED FIT TO PROTECT PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS. ANYDEPOSITION OF SILT OR MUD ON NEW OR EXISTING PAVEMENT OR IN EXISTING STORMSEWERS OR SWALES SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAIN EVENT. AFFECTED AREAS SHALL BECLEANED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, ALL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR.ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER THETURF IS ESTABLISHED.4. ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THE END OF EACHWORKING DAY. A CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TODETAILS TO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS.5. PROPOSED PONDS SHALL BE EXCAVATED FIRST AND USED AS TEMPORARY PONDING DURINGCONSTRUCTION.6. WHEN INSTALLING END-OF-LINE FLARED END SECTIONS, BRING THE SILT FENCE UP & OVER THEFLARED END SECTIONS & COVER DISTURBED AREAS WITH RIP RAP. THE UPSTREAM FLARED ENDSECTIONS SHALL HAVE WOOD FIBER BLANKET INSTALLED ON THE DISTURBED SOILS.7. ALL UNPAVED AREAS ALTERED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST BE RESTORED WITHSEED AND MULCH, SOD, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET OR BE HARD SURFACE WITHIN 2 WEEKSOF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.8. THE SITE MUST BE STABILIZED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MPCA, NPDES, MNDOT, ANDCITY.A. TEMPORARY (GREATER THAN 1-YEAR) SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 22-111 AT30.5-POUNDS PER ACRE.B. TEMPORARY (LESS THAN 1-YEAR) SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 21-112 (FALL) OR21-111 (SPRING/SUMMER) AT 100-POUNDS PER ACREC. INFILTRATION/FILTRATION BASIN SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 34-262 AT 14.5-POUNDS PERACRE.D. POND SLOPES SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 AT 35-POUNDS PER ACRE.E. GENERAL SEEDING SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 25-151 AT 70-POUNDS PER ACRE.F. MULCH SHALL BE MNDOT TYPE 1 APPLIED AT 2-TONS PER ACRE.9. FOR AREAS WITH SLOPE OF 3:1 OR GREATER, RESTORATION WITH SOD OR EROSION CONTROLBLANKET IS REQUIRED.10. ALL TEMPORARY STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE INSTALLED AROUND THEM TO TRAPSEDIMENT.11. ALL PERMANENT PONDS USED AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS DURING CONSTRUCTIONSHALL BE DREDGED AFTER THE SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED TO RESTORE THE POND TO THEPROPOSED BOTTOM ELEVATION.12. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL AND STATE RULES INCLUDING THE NATIONALPOLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.13. THE SITE MUST BE KEPT IN A WELL-DRAINED CONDITION AT ALL TIMES. THE CONTRACTORSHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TEMPORARY DITCHES, PIPING OR OTHER MEANS REQUIRED TOINSURE PROPER DRAINAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. LOW POINTS IN ROADWAYS ORBUILDING PADS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH A POSITIVE OUTFLOW.14. PUBLIC STREETS USED FOR HAULING SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF SOIL AND DEBRIS. STREETSWEEPING SHALL BE CONCURRENT WITH SITE WORK.GENERAL EROSION CONTROL NOTESSTOWATSANGLSB-19SB-19E.O.F.HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCEHDSFBIOROLLBIO982980982980ROCK LOG GASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGAS GAS GAS PUG PUG PUGPUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUGFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FO FO FOFOFO FO FOPUGPUGPUGPUG WAT PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGGAS GAS CTVCTV CTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVFO FO FO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FO FO FO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FOPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FOFOFOFOTUGPUGPUG PUGPUGPUGPUG PUG PUG PUG PUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUG PUG PUG PUG PUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVXXXFO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOPUGPUGPUGSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STO STOSTO ST OSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSANSANSANSANSAN20.00STOSANSTO STO WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATFRANCE AVENUE SOUTH COUNTY ROAD NO. 17 WEST 70TH STREET8882010 20 10 UTILITY EASEMENT PER THE PLATOF YORKTOWN DOC. NO.1033725 (ITEM NO. 11)22822TELECOMMUNICATIONS EASEMENTPER DOC. NO. 983149 (ITEM NO. 12)SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTPER DOC. NO. (ITEM NO. 11)1520 15SCENIC AND OPEN SPACE EASEMENT INFAVOR OF EDINA VILLAGE (NOW CITY)PER DOC. NO. 1033728 (ITEM NO. 14)SCENIC AND OPEN SPACE EASEMENT INFAVOR OF EDINA VILLAGE (NOW CITY) PERDOC. NO. 1033728 (ITEM NO. 14)1010PUBLIC ROAD EASEMENT IN PER DOC.NO. 1036934 (ITEM NO. 15)STREET RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED IN THE PLAT OFYORKTOWN DOC. NO. 1033725 (ITEM NO. 16)40 40 HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO.2189613 (ITEM NOS. 15 & 16)HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC.NO. 2189613 (ITEM NOS. 15 & 16)PUBLIC STREET, DRAINAGE & UTILITYEASEMENT PER DOC. NO. T4859947(ITEM NO. 16)SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT PERDOC. NOS. T05067233 &T05132844(ITEM NO. 17)SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENTPER DOC. NOS. T05067233 &T05132844 (ITEM NO. 17)TELECOMMUNICATIONSEASEMENT PER DOC. NO.983149 (ITEM NO. 12)EEEEEEEEEEMGTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTTVTVHHTTTTSTOSTOSTOSTORIM = 862.97IE = 855.15 (CITY AS-BUILT)S9" CLAY @ 0.8%ST-5ST-6ST-4ST-3ST-2ST-116" ASH13" LCH14" ASHGW: 852.7GW: 853.5GW: 857.5GW: 848.6GW: NOT OBSERVEDGW: NOT OBSERVEDST-101GW: 852.9ST-102GW: 853.5ST-103GW: 853.5ST-104GW: 854.6ST-105GW: NOT OBSERVEDST-106GW: 853.4ST-107GW: NOT OBSERVEDST-108GW: NOT OBSERVEDSTOSTOSTOCOMMERCIAL/RETAIL SPACEFOOTPRINT = 47,200 SFFFE (HOSPITALITY) = 870.00FFE (OFFICE LOBBY) = 868.00FFE (LOADING DOCK) = 866.00MULTI-FAMILY HOUSINGBUILDING FOOTPRINT = 44,300 SFFFE (RESIDENTIAL) = 870.75PARKING RAMPFFE = 866.50GFE = 856.00GFE = 860.00GFE = 860.75GFE = 857.00PROPOSED FINANCIALINSTITUTIONFOOTPRINT = 6,200 SFFFE = 866.00XXXXX8" SAN STUBIE=858.608" WM STUB8" SAN STUBIE=856.948" WM STUB8" WM STUB6" SAN STUBIE=856.466" SAN STUBIE=860.278" SAN STUBIE=861.366" WM STUB8" WM STUBHYDRANTHYDRANTHYDRANTHYDRANTHYDRANT109 LF - 10" PVC @ 0.70%SAN MH 11RIM=863.85IE(E)=855.50IE(SW)=855.40CORE DRILL INTOEXISTING SAN MH 10RAISE RIM TO 863.67IE(S,NE)=855.1536 LF - 10" PVC @ 0.70%SAN MH 12RIM=864.56IE(N,E)=855.83IE(W)=855.73SAN MH 13RIM=865.55IE(N,E)=856.69IE(W)=856.59222 LF - 10" PVC @ 0.70%SAN MH 14RIM=866.94IE(E,S)=858.34IE(W)=858.24SAN MH 15RIM=867.78IE(N)=859.15IE(W)=859.05102 LF - 10" PVC @ 0.70%SAN MH 16RIM=867.89IE(W,N)=859.95IE(S)=859.85100 LF - 10" PVC @ 0.70%171 LF - 8" PVC @ 0.70%SAN MH 16RIM=870.32IE(W)=861.25IE(S)=861.1516 LF - 8" PVC @ 0.70%16 LF - 6" PVC @ 2.00%26 LF - 10" PVC @ 1.00%25 LF - 8" PVC @ 1.00%INSULATE PIPE25 LF - 6" PVC @ 2.00%8" DIP1234567891011121314151617181920AAA8" DIP8" DIP8" DIP8" DIP33 LF - 10"PVC @ 0.70%REFER TO US BANK LOT PLANS FORLOT SPECIFIC UTILITY INFORMATIONSHEET NUMBER:DATE:DATE:LICENSE NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA VERTICAL SCALE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: DRAWN: CHECKED: DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE: REVISIONS:PREPARED FOR: Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 N:\0029211.10\DWG\CIVIL\0029211.10UT01.DWG EDINA, MN09/13/202170TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTSANITARY AND WATERMAIN PLAN 70TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTC400 .09/13/2021 DAVID T. BADE . . . 10/16/2020 4530 WEST 77TH STREET SUITE #365 EDINA, MN 55435 ORION/MORTENSON Œ:HVWZRRG3URIHVVLRQDO6HUYLFHV,QFCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com### ### or ## 01/25/2021 02/26/2021 06/10/2021 09/13/2021 . US BANK FINAL DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL WATERSHED COMMENTS CLIENT REVISION PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUD .PROJECT NUMBER: 0029211.10SANEXISTINGPROPOSEDSANITARY SEWERSTOSTORM SEWERWATWATER MAINEASEMENT LINEPROPERTY LINEWATHYDRANTGATE VALVEDRAIN TILEFLARED END SECTION (WITH RIPRAP)LIGHT POLEGASGASGASPUGUNDERGROUND ELECTRICPUGTUGUNDERGROUND TELEPHONETOHPOHOVERHEAD ELECTRICPOHTOHOVERHEAD TELEPHONETOHFOTELEPHONE FIBER OPTICFOCTVCABLE TELEVISIONCTVFMFMSANITARY SEWER FORCE MAINCURB AND GUTTERUTILITY LEGEND1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESEPLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THEINFORMATION SHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES.2. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATER MAIN MATERIAL AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE PER CITY REQUIREMENTS, MINNESOTAPLUMBING CODE, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICELINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OFMINNESOTA.3. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE NECESSARY FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS FOR THE PROPOSEDWORK OR VERIFY WITH THE OWNER OR ENGINEER THAT PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. PERMIT FEES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OFTHE CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE ARRANGED WITH THE OWNER.4. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF DOORWAYS, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS,PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY CONNECTION LOCATIONS.5. ALL PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE SERVICE LINE CONSTRUCTION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY CITY PERMITS FOR UTILITY CONNECTIONS, AND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED ANDAPPROVED BY THE CITY. THE CITY SHALL BE NOTIFIED 48-HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH THE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION OR ANYREQUIRED TESTING. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE, INTERFERE WITH, CONNECT ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO, OR TAP ANY WATER MAINBELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF SCHEDULED ORUNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.7. WATER MAIN LENGTHS AS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE HORIZONTAL LENGTHS. ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL PIPE WHEN INSTALLING ONSLOPES OR WHEN DEFLECTIONS ARE REQUIRED. THE JOINT DEFLECTIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM RECOMMENDED BY THE PIPEMANUFACTURER OR BY LOCAL GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS. FITTINGS REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT WATER MAIN SHALL BE INCLUDED INWATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION.8. PROVIDE WATER MAIN THRUST RESTRAINTS PER CITY STANDARD REQUIREMENTS.9. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATER LINE CROSSINGS WITH SANITARY SEWER OR STORMSEWER. THE WATER LINE SHALL NOT HAVE JOINTS OR CONNECTION WITHIN 10-FEET OF THE CROSSING. INSULATE CROSSINGS WITHSTORM SEWER.10. UTILITY SERVICES TYPICALLY TERMINATE 5' OUTSIDE BUILDING WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN OR NOTED.11. DUCTILE IRON WATER LINES SHALL BE CLASS 52, PER AWWA C115 OR C151. COPPER WATER LINES SHALL BE TYPE K PER ASTM B88. PVCWATER LINES SHALL BE PER AWWA C900 AND INSTALLED PER AWWA C605 IF ALLOWED BY CITY.12. ALL WATER LINES SHALL HAVE 7.5' MINIMUM COVER. INSULATE WATER MAIN IF LESS THAN 8' OF COVER. INSULATION SHALL BE DOWSTYROFOAM HI BRAND 35 OR EQUIVALENT, WITH 4 INCHES OF THICKNESS.13. SANITARY SEWER PIPE OUTSIDE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SDR 35 OR 26. SDR 26 IS REQUIRED FORDEPTHS GREATER THAN 15 FEET. SANITARY SEWER PIPE WITHIN 5 FEET OF THE BUILDING AND UNDER FOOTINGS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40PER ASTM D2665. ALL PLASTIC SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE INSTALLED PER D2321. SOLVENT WELD JOINTS MUST INCLUDE USE OF APRIMER WHICH IS OF A CONTRASTING COLOR TO THE PIPE AND CEMENT. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE TESTED ACCORDING TOMINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PART 712.0.14. STORM SEWER PIPE:A. RCP AND HDPE PIPE MAY BE INSTALLED WITH APPROVAL OF LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY.B. REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 5 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 18" AND SMALLER, CLASS 3 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 21" ANDLARGER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, PER ASTM C76 WITH R-4 GASKETS.C. HDPE STORM PIPE 4- TO 10-INCHES IN DIAMETER SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTO M252. HDPE STORM PIPE 12- TO60-INCHES IN DIAMETER SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2306. FITTINGS SHALL BE PER ASTM D3212 AND INSTALLED PERASTM D2321.D. PVC STORM SEWER PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PIPE PER ASTM D2665 AND INSTALLED PER ASTM D2321.E. CORRUGATED METAL PIPE (CMP) FOR SIZES 18- TO 120-INCH AND MUST MEET ASTM A760 OR ASTM A796 AND BE INSTALLED PERASTM A798. CMP MAY NOT BE INSTALLED WITHIN 10-FEET OF A WATERMAIN, WATER SERVICE, OR A BUILDING.F. ALL STORM SEWER JOINTS AND STRUCTURE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT AS REQUIRED BY MINNESOTAPLUMBING CODE, PART 707.3. STORM SEWER LOCATED WITHIN 10-FEET OF A BUILDING AND/OR WATER LINE SHALL BE TESTED PERMINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PART 712.15. ALL NONCONDUCTIVE PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A LOCATE (TRACER) WIRE PER MINNESOTA RULES, PART 7560.0150.16. POST INDICATOR VALVES SHALL BE CLOW F-5750 (OR EQUIVALENT) MEETING AWWA STANDARD C509 AND CITY STANDARDS. VALVE TOBE MECHANICAL JOINT RESILIENT WEDGE GATE VALVE. POST TO BE ADJUSTABLE FOR 8 FEET WATER MAIN DEPTH. THE ELECTRICAL ALARMSWITCH SHALL BE PART NO. PCVS2 (OR EQUIVALENT).17. AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN AS-BUILT RECORD OF UTILITYCONSTRUCTION. THE AS-BUILT SHALL INCLUDE LOCATION AND LENGTH DEVIATIONS OR CHANGES TO THE PLAN. CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY WITH OWNER OR ENGINEER WHETHER A PLAN WITH POST-CONSTRUCTION ELEVATIONS IS REQUIRED.18. ALL MANHOLE CASTINGS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.05 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS ON PLAN REFLECT THE SUMPED ELEVATIONS.19. ALL CATCH BASIN CASTINGS IN CURB SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET AND MANHOLE CASTINGS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.05FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS ON PLAN REFLECT THE SUMPED ELEVATIONS.GENERAL UTILITY NOTESSDTNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION0'30'60'90'1" = 30'A. CONNECT TO EXISTING. COORDINATE CONNECTION WITH THE CITY.UTILITY KEYNOTEA GASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGAS GAS GAS PUG PUG PUGPUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUGFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FO FO FOFOFO FO FOPUGPUGPUGPUG WAT PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGGAS GAS CTVCTV CTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVFO FO FO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FO FO FO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FOPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FOFOFOFOTUGPUGPUG PUGPUGPUGPUG PUG PUG PUG PUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUG PUG PUG PUG PUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVXXXFO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOPUGPUGPUGSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STO STOSTO ST OSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSANSANSANSANSAN20.00STOSANSTO STO WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATFRANCE AVENUE SOUTH COUNTY ROAD NO. 17 WEST 70TH STREET8882010 20 10 UTILITY EASEMENT PER THE PLATOF YORKTOWN DOC. NO.1033725 (ITEM NO. 11)22822TELECOMMUNICATIONS EASEMENTPER DOC. NO. 983149 (ITEM NO. 12)SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTPER DOC. NO. (ITEM NO. 11)1520 15SCENIC AND OPEN SPACE EASEMENT INFAVOR OF EDINA VILLAGE (NOW CITY)PER DOC. NO. 1033728 (ITEM NO. 14)SCENIC AND OPEN SPACE EASEMENT INFAVOR OF EDINA VILLAGE (NOW CITY) PERDOC. NO. 1033728 (ITEM NO. 14)1010PUBLIC ROAD EASEMENT IN PER DOC.NO. 1036934 (ITEM NO. 15)STREET RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED IN THE PLAT OFYORKTOWN DOC. NO. 1033725 (ITEM NO. 16)40 40 HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO.2189613 (ITEM NOS. 15 & 16)HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC.NO. 2189613 (ITEM NOS. 15 & 16)PUBLIC STREET, DRAINAGE & UTILITYEASEMENT PER DOC. NO. T4859947(ITEM NO. 16)SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT PERDOC. NOS. T05067233 &T05132844(ITEM NO. 17)SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENTPER DOC. NOS. T05067233 &T05132844 (ITEM NO. 17)TELECOMMUNICATIONSEASEMENT PER DOC. NO.983149 (ITEM NO. 12)EEEEEEEEEEMGTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTTVTVHHTTTTSTOSTOSTOSTORIM=871.0FULL OFDEBRISRIM=870.6INV(E)=866.4INV(NE)-866.3RIM=871.6INV(E)=865.1INV(W)=864.9INV(S)=866.1RIM=869.1INV(E)=864.5RIM=868.3INV(N/E)=864.3INV(W)=863.6RIM=866.7INV(N)=862.7INV(S)=863.0INV(E/W)=862.6RIM=866.5INV(N)=862.6INV(E)=862.5INV(W)=861.7RIM=871.5INV(E)=867.215"RCPRIM=867.5INV=863.2RIM = 862.97IE = 855.15 (CITY AS-BUILT)RIM=866.8INV(E)=859.4INV(W)=859.1RIM=862.8INV(N)=857.2INV(E)=859.2INV(SE)=857.5INV(SW)=856.3RIM=866.2INV=863.3RIM=869.5FULLOFWATERRIM=871.1INV=868.0RIM=863.4FULL OF ICE & DEBRISRIM=863.1INV(NE)=859.6INV(W)=859.1RIM=861.2INV=858.112" RCPRIM=861.8INV(E)=857.7INV(W)=858.2INV(S)=857.6RIM=862.1INV=857.912" RCPRIM=862.5INV(N)=852.8INV(S)=852.615" RCP21" RCPS12" RCP21" RCP12" RCP21" RCP9" CLAY @ 0.8%24" RCP24" RCP24" RCP12" RCP 8"PVC 12"RCPST-5ST-6ST-4ST-3ST-2ST-116" ASH13" LCH14" ASHGW: 852.7GW: 853.5GW: 857.5GW: 848.6GW: NOT OBSERVEDGW: NOT OBSERVEDST-101GW: 852.9ST-102GW: 853.5ST-103GW: 853.5ST-104GW: 854.6ST-105GW: NOT OBSERVEDST-106GW: 853.4ST-107GW: NOT OBSERVEDST-108GW: NOT OBSERVED15" RCPSTOSTOSTOCOMMERCIAL/RETAIL SPACEFOOTPRINT = 47,200 SFFFE (HOSPITALITY) = 870.00FFE (OFFICE LOBBY) = 868.00FFE (LOADING DOCK) = 866.00MULTI-FAMILY HOUSINGBUILDING FOOTPRINT = 44,300 SFFFE (RESIDENTIAL) = 870.75PARKING RAMPFFE = 866.50GFE = 856.00GFE = 860.00GFE = 860.75GFE = 857.00PROPOSED FINANCIALINSTITUTIONFOOTPRINT = 6,200 SFFFE = 866.00XXXXX18" PVC ROOF DRAINIE=863.6415" PVC ROOF DRAINIE=861.0090" CONTECH CMP PIPESBOTTOM OF ROCK=855.50BOTTOM OF PIPES=856.50OUTLET ELEVATION=858.50INFILTRATION VOLUME=18,792 CF100-YEAR FLOOD VOLUME=60,076 CF100-YEAR HWL=863.34STMH 101RIM=863.36IE(S,N,E)=856.6028 LF - 15" RCP@ 1.07%54 LF - 15" RCP @ 1.43%REPLACE STMH 100RIM=863.13IE(W,N)=856.30STMH 102RIM=864.76IE(SW,E)=857.37202 LF - 15" RCP @ 0.50%STMH 103RIM=866.71IE(NE,W)=858.38OCS 104RIM=866.37IE(N)=856.50IE(SW)=858.5024 LF - 15" RCP @ 0.50%CBMH 201RIM=865.36IE(S)=860.66IE(E)=860.58IE(NW)=859.00CB 210RIM=866.22IE(E)=862.7260 LF -21" RCP@ 0.50%STMH 200RIM=866.65IE(W)=862.60IE(SE)=858.70IE(N)=856.503' SUMP=853.50CB 220RIM=865.60IE(W,E)=862.10190 LF - 12" RCP @ 0.50%88 LF - 12" RCP @ 0.50%STMH 202RIM=867.67IE(N)=862.69IE(S)=861.66IE(W)=861.536 LF - 18" PVC@ 2.00%30 LF - TRENCHDRAIN @ 1.00%TRENCH DRAINRIM=869.60IE=868.72TRENCH DRAINRIM=869.72IE=868.72CBMH 301RIM=870.60IE(E)=866.40IE(S,N)=865.0633 LF - 15" RCP @ 0.48%REBUILD STMH 300RIM=871.60IE(N)=867.05IE(E)=865.10IE(S)=864.90IE(W)=864.901234567891011121314151617181920CBMH 203RIM=867.00IE(N,S)=863.0265 LF - 12" STM@ 0.50%CONNECT TOCONTECH CMP PIPE.IE=859.8018" PVC ROOF DRAINIE=863.006 LF - 18" PVC@ 2.00%CONNECT TOCONTECH CMP PIPE.IE=859.8018" PVC ROOF DRAINIE=864.506 LF - 18" PVC@ 2.00%CONNECT TOCONTECH CMP PIPE.IE=859.8018" PVC ROOF DRAINIE=864.506 LF - 18" PVC@ 2.00%CONNECT TOCONTECH CMP PIPE.IE=859.8018" PVC ROOF DRAINIE=863.6845 LF - 18" PVC@ 2.00%CONNECT TOCONTECH CMP PIPE.IE=859.8018" PVC ROOF DRAINIE=863.0445 LF - 18" PVC@ 2.00%CONNECT TOCONTECH CMP PIPE.IE=859.8023 LF -12" RCP@ 0.50%17 LF - 15" PVC @ 2.00%CBMH 302RIM=869.51IE(S)=868.70IE(E)=866.00IE(N)=865.35CB 310RIM=870.77IE=867.2772 LF - 12" RCP @ 0.48%29 LF - 12" RCP@ 4.38%REFER TO US BANK LOT PLANS FORLOT SPECIFIC UTILITY INFORMATIONSUMP MH 230RIM=867.14IE(W)=862.14IE(E)=859.88SUMP=856.88SUMP MH 240RIM=868.50IE(W)=862.78IE(E)=859.88SUMP=856.88SUMP MH 250RIM=869.87IE(W)=864.38IE(E)=859.88SUMP=856.88SUMP MH 260RIM=870.64IE(E)=864.38IE(W)=859.88SUMP=856.88SUMP MH 270RIM=868.94IE(E)=862.88IE(W)=859.88SUMP=856.88SUMP MH 280RIM=867.64IE(E)=863.52IE(W)=859.88SUMP=856.88SHEET NUMBER:DATE:DATE:LICENSE NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA VERTICAL SCALE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: DRAWN: CHECKED: DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE: REVISIONS:PREPARED FOR: Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 N:\0029211.10\DWG\CIVIL\0029211.10UT01.DWG EDINA, MN09/13/202170TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTSTORM SEWER PLAN 70TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTC401 .09/13/2021 DAVID T. BADE . . . 10/16/2020 4530 WEST 77TH STREET SUITE #365 EDINA, MN 55435 ORION/MORTENSON Œ:HVWZRRG3URIHVVLRQDO6HUYLFHV,QFCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com### ### or ## 01/25/2021 02/26/2021 06/10/2021 09/13/2021 . US BANK FINAL DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL WATERSHED COMMENTS CLIENT REVISION PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUD .PROJECT NUMBER: 0029211.10SANEXISTINGPROPOSEDSANITARY SEWERSTOSTORM SEWERWATWATER MAINEASEMENT LINEPROPERTY LINEWATHYDRANTGATE VALVEDRAIN TILEFLARED END SECTION (WITH RIPRAP)LIGHT POLEGASGASGASPUGUNDERGROUND ELECTRICPUGTUGUNDERGROUND TELEPHONETOHPOHOVERHEAD ELECTRICPOHTOHOVERHEAD TELEPHONETOHFOTELEPHONE FIBER OPTICFOCTVCABLE TELEVISIONCTVFMFMSANITARY SEWER FORCE MAINCURB AND GUTTERUTILITY LEGEND1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESEPLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THEINFORMATION SHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES.2. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATER MAIN MATERIAL AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE PER CITY REQUIREMENTS, MINNESOTAPLUMBING CODE, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICELINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OFMINNESOTA.3. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE NECESSARY FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS FOR THE PROPOSEDWORK OR VERIFY WITH THE OWNER OR ENGINEER THAT PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. PERMIT FEES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OFTHE CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE ARRANGED WITH THE OWNER.4. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF DOORWAYS, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS,PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY CONNECTION LOCATIONS.5. ALL PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE SERVICE LINE CONSTRUCTION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY CITY PERMITS FOR UTILITY CONNECTIONS, AND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED ANDAPPROVED BY THE CITY. THE CITY SHALL BE NOTIFIED 48-HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH THE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION OR ANYREQUIRED TESTING. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE, INTERFERE WITH, CONNECT ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO, OR TAP ANY WATER MAINBELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF SCHEDULED ORUNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.7. WATER MAIN LENGTHS AS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE HORIZONTAL LENGTHS. ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL PIPE WHEN INSTALLING ONSLOPES OR WHEN DEFLECTIONS ARE REQUIRED. THE JOINT DEFLECTIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM RECOMMENDED BY THE PIPEMANUFACTURER OR BY LOCAL GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS. FITTINGS REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT WATER MAIN SHALL BE INCLUDED INWATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION.8. PROVIDE WATER MAIN THRUST RESTRAINTS PER CITY STANDARD REQUIREMENTS.9. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATER LINE CROSSINGS WITH SANITARY SEWER OR STORMSEWER. THE WATER LINE SHALL NOT HAVE JOINTS OR CONNECTION WITHIN 10-FEET OF THE CROSSING. INSULATE CROSSINGS WITHSTORM SEWER.10. UTILITY SERVICES TYPICALLY TERMINATE 5' OUTSIDE BUILDING WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN OR NOTED.11. DUCTILE IRON WATER LINES SHALL BE CLASS 52, PER AWWA C115 OR C151. COPPER WATER LINES SHALL BE TYPE K PER ASTM B88. PVCWATER LINES SHALL BE PER AWWA C900 AND INSTALLED PER AWWA C605 IF ALLOWED BY CITY.12. ALL WATER LINES SHALL HAVE 8' MINIMUM COVER. INSULATE WATER MAIN IF LESS THAN 8' OF COVER. INSULATION SHALL BE DOWSTYROFOAM HI BRAND 35 OR EQUIVALENT, WITH 4 INCHES OF THICKNESS.13. SANITARY SEWER PIPE OUTSIDE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SDR 35 OR 26. SDR 26 IS REQUIRED FORDEPTHS GREATER THAN 15 FEET. SANITARY SEWER PIPE WITHIN 5 FEET OF THE BUILDING AND UNDER FOOTINGS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40PER ASTM D2665. ALL PLASTIC SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE INSTALLED PER D2321. SOLVENT WELD JOINTS MUST INCLUDE USE OF APRIMER WHICH IS OF A CONTRASTING COLOR TO THE PIPE AND CEMENT. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE TESTED ACCORDING TOMINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PART 712.0.14. STORM SEWER PIPE:A. RCP AND HDPE PIPE MAY BE INSTALLED WITH APPROVAL OF LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY.B. REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 5 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 18" AND SMALLER, CLASS 3 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 21" ANDLARGER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, PER ASTM C76 WITH R-4 GASKETS.C. HDPE STORM PIPE 4- TO 10-INCHES IN DIAMETER SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTO M252. HDPE STORM PIPE 12- TO60-INCHES IN DIAMETER SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2306. FITTINGS SHALL BE PER ASTM D3212 AND INSTALLED PERASTM D2321.D. PVC STORM SEWER PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PIPE PER ASTM D2665 AND INSTALLED PER ASTM D2321.E. CORRUGATED METAL PIPE (CMP) FOR SIZES 18- TO 120-INCH AND MUST MEET ASTM A760 OR ASTM A796 AND BE INSTALLED PERASTM A798. CMP MAY NOT BE INSTALLED WITHIN 10-FEET OF A WATERMAIN, WATER SERVICE, OR A BUILDING.F. ALL STORM SEWER JOINTS AND STRUCTURE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT AS REQUIRED BY MINNESOTAPLUMBING CODE, PART 707.3. STORM SEWER LOCATED WITHIN 10-FEET OF A BUILDING AND/OR WATER LINE SHALL BE TESTED PERMINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PART 712.15. ALL NONCONDUCTIVE PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A LOCATE (TRACER) WIRE PER MINNESOTA RULES, PART 7560.0150.16. POST INDICATOR VALVES SHALL BE CLOW F-5750 (OR EQUIVALENT) MEETING AWWA STANDARD C509 AND CITY STANDARDS. VALVE TOBE MECHANICAL JOINT RESILIENT WEDGE GATE VALVE. POST TO BE ADJUSTABLE FOR 8 FEET WATER MAIN DEPTH. THE ELECTRICAL ALARMSWITCH SHALL BE PART NO. PCVS2 (OR EQUIVALENT).17. AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN AS-BUILT RECORD OF UTILITYCONSTRUCTION. THE AS-BUILT SHALL INCLUDE LOCATION AND LENGTH DEVIATIONS OR CHANGES TO THE PLAN. CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY WITH OWNER OR ENGINEER WHETHER A PLAN WITH POST-CONSTRUCTION ELEVATIONS IS REQUIRED.18. ALL MANHOLE CASTINGS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.05 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS ON PLAN REFLECT THE SUMPED ELEVATIONS.19. ALL CATCH BASIN CASTINGS IN CURB SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET AND MANHOLE CASTINGS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.05FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS ON PLAN REFLECT THE SUMPED ELEVATIONS.GENERAL UTILITY NOTESSDTNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION0'30'60'90'1" = 30'12" SIDE SPACING(TYP.)12"36" INTERIOR SPACING(TYP.)90"'(TYP.)LAST REVISED:08/11/17UNDERGROUND CONTECH STORMWATER STORAGEST20WASHED COURSE AGGREGATE40% VOIDSSUITABLE SUBGRADE MATERIALPAVEMENT SECTION. SEE DETAIL FORSPECIFIC DEPTHS.ON-SITE FILL MATERIAL24" INLET PIPEBOTTOM OF SAND = 855.50SEE PLAN FOR PIPELENGTH24" CONNECTION PIPE6"WEIR WALLELEVATION = 858.5015" STRUCTURE OUTLET PIPEHEADER PIPE PROFILEIE = 856.50IE = 856.50IE = 858.24NOT TO SCALEFOR REFERENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ENGINEERWITH SHOP DRAWINGS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SHEET NUMBER:DATE:DATE:LICENSE NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA VERTICAL SCALE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: DRAWN: CHECKED: DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE: REVISIONS:PREPARED FOR: Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 N:\0029211.10\DWG\CIVIL\0029211.10DT01.DWG EDINA, MN09/13/202170TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTCITY DETAILS 70TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTC500 .09/13/2021 DAVID T. BADE . . . 10/16/2020 4530 WEST 77TH STREET SUITE #365 EDINA, MN 55435 ORION/MORTENSON Œ:HVWZRRG3URIHVVLRQDO6HUYLFHV,QFCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com### ### or ## 01/25/2021 02/26/2021 06/10/2021 09/13/2021 . US BANK FINAL DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL WATERSHED COMMENTS CLIENT REVISION PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUD .PROJECT NUMBER: 0029211.10NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION0'#########1" = ### SHEET NUMBER:DATE:DATE:LICENSE NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA VERTICAL SCALE: HORIZONTAL SCALE: DRAWN: CHECKED: DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE: REVISIONS:PREPARED FOR: Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 N:\0029211.10\DWG\CIVIL\0029211.10DT01.DWG EDINA, MN09/13/202170TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTDETAILS 70TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENTC501 .09/13/2021 DAVID T. BADE . . . 10/16/2020 4530 WEST 77TH STREET SUITE #365 EDINA, MN 55435 ORION/MORTENSON Œ:HVWZRRG3URIHVVLRQDO6HUYLFHV,QFCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com### ### or ## 01/25/2021 02/26/2021 06/10/2021 09/13/2021 . US BANK FINAL DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL WATERSHED COMMENTS CLIENT REVISION PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUD .PROJECT NUMBER: 0029211.104"LAST REVISED:08/08/17WM06WATERMAIN INSULATIONSEWERWATERMINIMUM 2INSULATION LAYERSWITH JOINTSSTAGGERED6" COMPACTEDGRANULAR FILLWATERMAINW.M. COVER WIDTH (W) 4.0'-4.9' 8' 5.0'-5.9' 6' 6.0'-7.0' 4' 7.0' + 0'NOTES:1. INSULATION SHALL BE EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE (XEPS) INSULATION BOARD, "CERTIFOAM SE" OR"STYROFOAM SM" OR EQUIVALENT.2. INSULATION SHALL BE PLACED ON A SMOOTH, LEVEL FOUNDATION WHICH HAS BEEN FIRMLY COMPACTED.3. SEPARATE LAYERS OF INSULATION USED TO MAKE UP THE 4" THICKNESS SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTSTO ENSURE THE CONTINUITY OF THE INSULATION.4. ALL WATERMAIN/ STORM SEWER CROSSINGS WITH LESS THAN 36" CLEARANCE SHALL BE INSULATED.5. SANITARY SEWER INSULATION SIMILARMINIMUM 1 1/2" THICK INSULATIONLAYERS WITH JOINTS STAGGEREDAND EXTENDING 4' EACH WAYFROM WATERMAIN C/LMECHANICAL COMPACTEDBACKFILL6"W/2W/218" MIN.INSULATION FOR SHALLOW WATER MAININSULATION AT PIPE CROSSING4"ENTRANCE THRU CURB AND GUTTERSI07NOTES:1. 1/2" PREFORMED JOINT FILLER MATERIAL- AASHTO M2132. CONCRETE GUTTER SHALL BE PER MnDOT SPEC 2531LAST REVISED:08/15/17PLAN VIEWSECTION A-A1/2" EXPANSION JOINT 3'R MIN.VARIABLE WIDTH TO BE STAKED IN FIELD1/2" EXPANSION JOINT IFMATCHING CONCRETE3'3'R MIN.1/2" EXPANSION JOINTFLOW LINETO BE PAID AS 6" CONC. APRONTO BE PAID AS CONC. C&G TO BE PAID AS CONC. C&GBIT. SURFGUTTERAS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER3.0'TO BE PAID AS6" CONC. D.W.TO BE PAID AS 6" CONC. APRONAA6" MAX.AANOTES:1. PROVIDE A RELATIVELY FLAT MINIMUM 4'x4' LANDING BEHIND THE PEDESTRIAN RAMP, 2% MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE BOTH DIRECTIONS.2. CURB RAMP AREA TO BE CONCRETE AND MEET LATEST ADA REQUIREMENTS. RAMP CROSS SLOPE 2% MAXIMUM. BACK-TO-BACK PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SHALL HAVE MINIMUM 48'' LANDING BETWEEN, OR PROVIDE AT-GRADE CROSSING.3. SIDE FLARES TO BE CONCRETE AND IMPLEMENTED WHERE ADJACENT TO PAVED AREAS. FLARED SLOPE TO BE 10% MAXIMUM. EXISTING CURB RAMP ALTERATIONS, WITH NO LANDING, SHALL BE 8.33% MAXIMUM. PROVIDE 10% MAXIMUM SLOPE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.4. ANY VERTICAL LIP THAT OCCURS AT THE FLOW LINE MAY NOT BE GREATER THAN 1/4 INCH.5. ADA REQUIRED DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE(TRUNCATED DOMES) SHALL BE 2' MIN. IN DIRECTION OF LANDING AT CURB AND SHALL EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH OF THE LANDING. AREA SHALL BE CONTRASTING COLOR TO THE ADJACENT WALKING SURFACE WITH A PREFABRICATED CAST IRON TRUNCATED DOME INSERT MEETING THE ADA DOME SIZE AND SPACING REQUIREMENTS.ALAST REVISED:08/15/17PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPSI09AA332233FACE OFCURBBACK OFCURBFACE OFCURB15158"5' MIN.4' MIN. ORPER PLAN5' MIN. 5'-4" MIN. 2' 8"5' MIN.5' MIN.4' MIN. ORPER PLAN5'-4" MIN. 2'CURB FACEOR GUTTER5% APPROACHSLOPE MAXSEE NOTE #41/2" PREFORMEDJOINT FILLER MATERIALRAMP5'-4" MIN.LANDING4' MIN.RAMP 8.33%MAX. SLOPECONCRETE WALKDET. WARN.SURFACEROUND ALL SLOPEDINTERSECTIONSSIDE FLARE 10%MAX. SLOPESIDE FLARE5' MIN.RAMP4' MIN.SIDE FLARE5' MIN.ELEVATION OF RAMPSECTION A-APLAN VIEW OF DIAGONAL RAMPPLAN VIEW OF PERPENDICULAR RAMPNOTES:1. TAPED AREAS TO BE CENTERED AND ALIGNED ON CENTER LINE AND LANE LINES. MAKE ADJUSTMENTS IN CENTER MEDIAN AREA.2. ZEBRA CROSSWALKS SHALL BE WHITE POLYMER-PREFORMED TAPE OR AN ACCEPTABLE EQUIVALENT APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.3. A MINIMUM OF 1.5 FT. CLEAR DISTANCE MUST BE LEFT ADJACENT TO CURB. IF LAST STRIPED AREA FALLS INTO THIS DISTANCE, IT MUST BE OMITTED.4. REMOVE ALL CONFLICTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.5. AT SKEWED CROSSWALKS, THE TAPED AREAS ARE TO REMAIN PARALLEL TO THE LANE LINES.6. WHERE PAVEMENT MARKINGS CAN NOT BE INLAYED INTO THE HOT MAT, PAVEMENT SHALL BE GROOVED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE POLYMER-PREFORMED MARKINGS. SEE Mn/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 2564.LAST REVISED:08/15/17CROSS WALK STRIPINGSI11PAVEMENT MARKING(TYP.)DRIVING LANE(WIDTH VARIES)6 FT3 FT 3 FTDRIVING LANE(WIDTH VARIES)ROADCLNOTE:1. ALL TRAFFIC FLOW ARROWS TO BE SOLID WHITE REFLECTIVE TRAFFIC PAINT AS PER DIMENSIONS ABOVETRAFFIC ARROWLAST REVISED:08/15/17SI132.001.753.751.002.00R4.75HANDICAP SYMBOLLAST REVISED:08/15/17HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE AND STRIPINGSI15HANDICAP SIGNNOPARKINGNOTE:BOTTOM OF SIGNS TO BE MOUNTED60"-66" FROM PARKING GRADE, SEESIGN POST INSTALLATION DETAILHANDICAP PARKINGNOTE:STRIPING TO MATCHPARKING, UNLESSPER LOCAL CODENOTE:SEE PLAN FOR PARKING LAYOUTNOPARKINGPARKINGVEHICLE IDREQUIREDUP TO $200 FINEFOR VIOLATIONVANACCESSIBLENOPARKING ACCESS AISLEHANDICAP PARKING SPACE WITHPAINTED INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OFACCESSIBILITY WITH CONTRASTINGSQUARE BACKGROUND, CENTEREDTOWARD DRIVE AISLE.HANDICAP PARKINGSIGNS, 12"X18", OR PERLOCAL CODEHANDICAP SIGNCENTERED AT HEAD OFSPACE ON CENTER STRIPEHANDICAP PARKING ACCESSAISLE WITH PAINTED 12"HIGH LETTERING OF "NOPARKING" CENTEREDTOWARD DRIVE AISLEPER CITY CODE HANDICAP VANACCESSIBLE PARKINGSIGN, 12"X16", OR PERLOCAL CODE, ASAPPLICABLEFACE OF CURBSIDEWALKHANDICAP SIGNCENTERED AT HEAD OFSPACE, 2' MIN. AND 8'MAX. FROM FACE OFCURB2"-0"2"-0"10" DIAMETER CENTERSYMBOL IN PARKING STALL,ALL LINES TO BE 5" WIDE2"-0"NOPARKING4" WIDE PAINTED STRIPINGAT 45 DEGREES AND AT 2'O.C. AT ACCESS AISLE8'MIN.8'MIN.8'MIN.ƒ ƒSI19PAVEMENT SECTIONS SHOWN ARE FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY.REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR FINAL PAVEMENT SECTIONS.LAST REVISED:08/15/17PAVEMENT SECTIONS2" MnDOT TYPE SPWEA340E WEARING COURSE2" MnDOT TYPE SPNWB330E BASE COURSE8" MnDOT SPEC. 3138 CLASS 55" CONCRETE PAVEMENT W/ #4 REBAR AT 16" O.C. EACH WAY4" MnDOT SPEC. 3138 CLASS 5CONCRETE PAVEMENTBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (HEAVY DUTY)BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (STANDARD DUTY)COMPACTED SAND SUBGRADE (100% STANDARD PROCTOR)COMPACTED SAND SUBGRADE (100% STANDARD PROCTOR)MNDOT SPEC. 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT1.5" MnDOT TYPE SPWEA340E WEARING COURSE2" MnDOT TYPE SPNWB330E BASE COURSE6" MnDOT SPEC. 3138 CLASS 5COMPACTED SAND SUBGRADE (100% STANDARD PROCTOR)MNDOT SPEC. 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT6" COMPACTED CL. 5 AGGREGATEBASE, MNDOT 3138, 2211LAST REVISED:08/15/17HEAVY DUTY CONCRETESECTION LOADING DOCKSI21NOTES:1. CONCRETE SHALL BE REINFORCED WITH WELDED WIRE FABRIC OR REINFORCED BARS TO ASSIST IN CONTROLLING CRACKING FROM DRYING SHRINKAGE AND THERMAL CHANGES.2. SAWED OR FORMED CONTROL JOINTS SHOULD BE INCLUDED FOR EACH 225 SQUARE FEET OF AREA OR LESS (15 FEET BY 15 FEET). CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE JOINTING PATTERN AND SUBMIT TO ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.3. SAW CUTS SHOULD NOT CUT THROUGH THE WELDED WIRE FABRIC OR REINFORCING STEEL AND DOWELS SHOULD BE UTILIZED AT FORMED AND/OR COLD JOINTS.4. DOWELS SHALL BE UTILIZED AT FORMED AND/OR COLD JOINTS. DOWELS SHALL BE 30" LONG 1/2" DIAMETER SMOOTH AND GREASED TIE BARS AT 30" SPACING, MINIMUM 18" FROM PAVEMENT EDGE.7" 4000 PSI TYPE 3 CONCRETESURFACE COMPACTION2"4"AAMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTERCONSTRUCTION AT CATCH BASINLAST REVISED:08/15/17SI28PERSPECTIVESECTION A-ANOTE:MOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER TO BEFORMED INTO A B618 TYPE AT CATCH BASINMOUNTABLE CONCRETECURB & GUTTERCATCH BASIN FRAME& COVER#4 REBAR2" DEPRESSION10' MIN. TRANSITIONDESIGN GUTTERLINE GRADENEENAH FRAME & COVER R-3067-V WITHTYPE V GRATE OR APPROVED EQUALEXPANSION JOINTTOP OF CURB10' MIN.TRANSITION10' MIN.TRANSITIONFLOWNO SCALENO SCALEAALAST REVISED:08/15/17TRANSITION CURBSI31PERSPECTIVESECTION A-ANO SCALENO SCALEB6 STYLE CURBSEE DETAIL SI01TRANSITIONVARIESLAST REVISED:08/15/17SI40MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL8"NOTE:CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING ANDSHOP DRAWINGS IF WALL IS GREATER THAN 4FEET TALL. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT WALLBLOCK TYPE, SIZE, AND COLOR FOR APPROVAL.1" - 1 1/4"SWALE AT TOP OF WALLMAY BE REQUIRED, VERIFY8" MIN. LOW PERMEABLE SOILFILTER FABRICUNIT DRAINAGE FILL(3/4" CRUSHED ROCKOR STONE)APPROXIMATE LIMITSOF EXCAVATION4" PERFORATED PVC DRAINTILEWRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC,DAYLIGHT OR TO STORM SYSTEM,AS REQUIREDUNREINFORCED CONCRETE ORCRUSHED STONE LEVELING PADFINISHED GRADECONCRETE MODULAR BLOCKANCHORING PINS (AS REQUIRED)CAP UNIT, ADHERED TO TOPCOURSE WITH ADHESIVEFOUNDATIONSOILRETAINED SOILDESIGN HEIGHT LAST REVISED:08/15/17FENCE AT MODULAR BLOCK WALLSI41NOTE:CONCRETE SLEEVE (AND/OR FOOTING) TO BE SET DURING WALLCONSTRUCTION, NOT DRILLED THROUGH GEOGRID AFTERWARDS, WHEN DIRECTLY BEHIND UNITS.CONCRETE MODULARBLOCKFENCE POSTFENCE POST CONCRETEFOOTING AND SLEEVE,DIAMETER, AND DEPTH PERFENCE SPECIFICATIONSGEOGRIDCAP UNIT, ADHERED TO TOPCOURSE WITH ADHESIVEANCHORING PINS (AS REQUIRED)3.5' MIN.  ”12"12"TREADLAST REVISED:08/15/17CONCRETE STAIR AND RAILINGSI48NOTES:1. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR APPROVAL. FIELD VERIFY CONDITIONS.2. RAILING AND STAIRS BOTH SIDES OF STAIRS AND PER ADA REQUIREMENTS.3. ALL HARDWARE TO BE GALVANIZED OR STAINLESS STEEL, AND FINISH TO MATCH RAILING.4. RAILING FINISH TO BE PRIMED AND PAINTED. COLOR TO PER OWNER.HAND RAIL, 1 1/2" DIAMETERTUBULAR STEEL, WELD ANDGRIND ALL JOINTS, POSTS 6'MAXIMUM SPACING3" RADIUS(TYP.)1/2" RADIUS,NOSECONCRETESTEPS WITHNON-SLIP FINISHMNDOT 3138 CLASS 5AGGREGATE BASE#4 REBAR @12" O.C. MAX.EACH WAY,3" CLEAR#5 REBAR @ NOSE,2" CLEAR(TYP.)ADJACENT PAVEMENT(TYP.)EXPANSION JOINT(TYP.)RAILING POST:SURFACE MOUNTOR EMBEDDED(6" DEPTH)TREAD SLOPE1/8" PER FT.SEE PLAN12"3'-0" 1'-6"12"1"6" RISERLAST REVISED:08/15/17SI50TYPICAL CURB CUT SECTION AT DRIVEWAYS3'18'3'TRANSITION TO B618CURBB618 CURB12'B618 CURBC/L DRIVEWAYSETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINE3NOTES:1. VERIFY DRIVEWAY LOCATION WITH DEVELOPER2. VERIFY MAXIMUM DRIVEWAY WIDTH WITH CITY3. LOCATION SHOWN TYPICAL FOR GARAGE RIGHT ON TANGENT OF THE ROADX'TRANSITION TO B618CURB12"MIN.LAST REVISED:08/15/17MACHINE SLICED SILT FENCE(HEAVY DUTY)GD03FLOWFLOW RUNOFFNOTES:1. INSPECT AND REPAIR FENCE AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND REMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN ACCUMULATED TO 1/2 THE HEIGHT OF THE FABRIC OR MORE.2. REMOVED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DEPOSITED TO AN AREA THAT WILL NOT CONTRIBUTE SEDIMENT OFF-SITE AND CAN BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED.3. SILT FENCE SHALL BE PLACED ON SLOPE CONTOURS TO MAXIMIZE PONDING EFFICIENCY.4. ALL ENDS OF THE SILT FENCE SHALL BE WRAPPED UPSLOPE SO THE ELEVATION OF THE BOTTOM OF FABRIC IS HIGHER THAN "PONDING HEIGHT".5. "HEAVY DUTY" IS SAME AS MACHINE SLICED ONLY HAND INSTALLED.WOVEN MONOFILAMENT (36" WIDE)FILTER FABRIC, ATTACHSECURELY TO UPSTREAMSIDE OF POST WITH 3-50LBTENSILE STRENGTH PLASTICZIP-TIES PER POST WITHINTOP 8" OF FABRIC5' STEEL T-POSTFABRIC SLICED INTOSOIL WITHCOMPACTED BACKFILL5' STEEL T-POST6'-0" MAX.SPACINGSTANDARD DETAILPONDING HEIGHTTRENCH WITH NATIVE BACKFILLLAST REVISED:08/15/17CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEGD05NOTES:1. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED UNDER ROCK/WOOD CHIPS TO STOP MUD MIGRATION THROUGH ROCK/WOOD CHIPS.2. WOODCHIPS USED FOR CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES MUST BE 80% NOT LESS THAN 2-INCHES AND NOT MORE THAN 5-INCHES. NO CHIPPED-UP MANUFACTURED WOOD AND/OR CHEMICALLY TREATED IS ALLOWED.3. ENTRANCES MUST BE MAINTAINED REGULARLY TO PREVENT SEDIMENTATION ON PUBLIC ROADWAYS. FUGITIVE ROCK OR WOODCHIPS WILL BE REMOVED FROM ADJACENT ROADWAYS DAILY OR MORE FREQUENTLY AS NECESSARY.4. LENGTH AND WIDTH TO BE ADJUSTED FOR SITE CONDITIONS.HARD SURFACEPUBLIC ROAD1"-2" WASHED ROCKOR WOODCHIPS PERSPECIFICATIONS18" MINIMUM CUT OFF TOMINIMIZE RUNOFF FROM SITEROCK=12" MIN.WOODCHIPS=18" MIN.2 0 ' M IN .WID TH 50' MIN.12' MIN.15' MIN.VARIESLAST REVISED:08/15/17CONCRETE WASHOUT AREAGD08AANOTES:1. CONCRETE WASHOUT AREAS WILL HAVE AN IMPERMEABLE LINER TO PREVENT CONCRETE WASHOUT WATER FROM INFILTRATING/CONTACTING WITH SOIL.2. IMPERMEABLE LINER INCLUDES 10 MIL POLY LINER OR COMPACTED CLAY LINER.3. WASHOUT SYSTEMS CAN BE USED AS ALTERNATE WASHOUT AREAS.ROOF ACCESSEARTH BERMMULCH & SEEDSILT FENCECONCRETEWASHOUT SIGNIMPERMEABLE LINERSILT FENCE1.5'MIN.SECTION A-APOCKETNOTES:1. ALL GEOTEXTILE USED FOR INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE MONOFILAMENT IN BOTH DIRECTIONS, (MEETING MnDOT SPEC. 3733 GEOTEXTILES)2. FINISHED SIZE (INCLUDING POCKETS) SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 10" AROUND THE PERIMETER TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE OR REMOVAL.3. DO NOT INSTALL PROTECTION IN INLETS SHALLOWER THAN 30". THE INSTALLED BAG SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM SIDE CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE INLET WALLS AND THE BAG, MEASURED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OVERFLOW HOLES, OF 3". WHERE NECESSARY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLINCH THE BAG (USING PLASTIC ZIP TIES) TO ACHIEVE THE 3" CLEARANCE.LAST REVISED:08/15/17STORM DRAINFILTER BAG INSERTGD10FLAP4"INLET SPECIFICATIONSTO MATCH THE PLANDIMENSION LENGTHAND WIDTH21MINIMUM DOUBLESTITCHED SEAMS ALLAROUND SIDE PIECESAND ON FLAP POCKETSFRONT, BACK, ANDBOTTOM TO BEMADE FROM SINGLEPIECE OF FABRIC2"x4" HOLE SHALL BEHEAT CUT INTO ALLFOUR SIDE PANELSUSE REBAR OR STEEL RODFOR REMOVAL ( FOR INLETSWITH CAST CURB BOX,REPLACE ROD WITH WOOD2" X 4") . EXTEND 10"BEYOND GRATE ON BOTHSIDES, SECURE TO GRATEWITH WIRE OR PLASTIC TIES412" 12"12"2"LAST REVISED:08/15/17INLET PROTECTION WITH ROCK LOGGD11NOTE:1. ALL GEOTEXTILE USED FOR INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE MONOFILAMENT IN BOTH DIRECTIONS. (MEETING SPEC. 3733 (TYPE 1) GEOTEXTILES, PROPOSED 2005 EDITION)ENDS SECURELYCLOSED TO PREVENTLOSS OF OPENGRADED AGGREGATEFILL. SECURED WITH50 PSI ZIP TIEOVERLAP ENDS 6"4' LONG AND 5" DIAMETER GEOTEXTILE SOCK.SEAM JOINED BY TWO ROWS OF STITCHINGWITH A PLASTIC MESH BACKING ORHEATBONDED. (OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT)FILL ROCK LOG WITH OPEN GRADEDAGGREGATE CONSISTING OF SOUND,DURABLE PARTICLES OF CRUSHED QUARRYROCK OR GRAVEL CONFORMING TO 3137,CA-3 (<1.5") GRADATION (OR EQUIVALENT).6"MAX.8"ANOTES:1. PROVIDE A RELATIVELY FLAT MINIMUM 4'x4' LANDING BEHIND THE PEDESTRIAN RAMP, 2% MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE BOTH DIRECTIONS.2. CURB RAMP AREA TO BE CONCRETE AND MEET LATEST ADA REQUIREMENTS. RAMP CROSS SLOPE 2% MAXIMUM. BACK-TO-BACK PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SHALL HAVE MINIMUM 48'' LANDING BETWEEN, OR PROVIDE AT-GRADE CROSSING.3. SIDE FLARES TO BE CONCRETE AND IMPLEMENTED WHERE ADJACENT TO PAVED AREAS. FLARED SLOPE TO BE 10% MAXIMUM. EXISTING CURB RAMP ALTERATIONS, WITH NO LANDING, SHALL BE 8.33% MAXIMUM. PROVIDE 10% MAXIMUM SLOPE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.4. ANY VERTICAL LIP THAT OCCURS AT THE FLOW LINE MAY NOT BE GREATER THAN 1/4 INCH.5. RAMP AND FLARED SIDE SURFACE TO BE MEDIUM BROOM FINISH, PERPENDICULAR TO TRAVEL PATH.6. WALK SHALL BE PER MnDOT SPEC 2521 MIX NO. 3A32 WITH A 28-DAY DESIGN STRENGTH OF 3900-PSI.ALAST REVISED:08/15/17PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPSI092PLAN VIEW OF DIAGONAL RAMPPLAN VIEW OF PERPENDICULAR RAMPSECTION A-AELEVATION OF RAMP32333FACE OFCURB5BACK OFCURB5FACE OFCURBCURB FACEOR GUTTER5% APPROACHSLOPE MAX1/2" PREFORMEDJOINT FILLER MATERIALRAMP 8.33%MAX. SLOPEROUND ALL SLOPEDINTERSECTIONSSIDE FLARE 10%MAX. SLOPECONCRETE WALK8" 5'-4" MIN.5' MIN.4' MIN. ORPER PLAN5' MIN. 5'-4" MIN.5' MIN.5' MIN.4' MIN. ORPER PLANRAMP5'-4" MIN.LANDING4' MIN.SIDE FLARE5' MIN.RAMP4' MIN.SIDE FLARE5' MIN.AA1143'-0"7'-0"3'-0"SIGN INSTALLEDIN LANDSCAPE AREAHANDICAP STALL PARKING SIGNINSTALLED IN PARKING LOTNOTE:1. SIGN TO BE 2-SIDED WHERE HANDICAP PARKING STALLS FACE ONE ANOTHER.2. PARKING GRADE IS DEFINED AS EITHER FLOW LINE OF CURB OR PAVEMENT SURFACEAT THE HEAD OF THE STALL.12"LAST REVISED:06/15/19SIGN POST INSTALLATIONSI14CONCRETE CURB &GUTTERCAP REQUIRED2" GALVANIZEDSTEEL PIPE,ROUND, SET INCONCRETEMOWING EDGEPAVEMENT6" STEELCASINGCONCRETEFOOTING2'-0"MIN.10"BOTTOM OF THELOWEST SIGN TOBE MOUNTED60"-66" FROMPARKING GRADE2'-0"MIN.3'-6" MIN. FROSTDEPTH IF GREATERCONCRETE CROSS GUTTERSI06NOTES:1. 1/2" PREFORMED JOINT FILLER MATERIAL- AASHTO M2132. CONCRETE GUTTER SHALL BE PER MnDOT SPEC 2531LAST REVISED:08/15/17EXPANSION JOINT(TYP.)SLOPE3/4" per ft3'7"#4 REBARSECTION A-A3' MIN.GUTTER FLOW LINEAA1LAST REVISED:01/09/20B6 STYLE CURB AND GUTTERSI01NOTES:1. EXPANSION JOINT SPACING IS 100'2. MIN. 3" CL. 5 UNDER C.&G.3. CURB SHALL BE PER MnDOT SPEC 25317"8"X"Y"6"13 1/2"Curb TypeXYB612B618B62424"18"12"20"26"32"SLOPE 3/4" PER FT.13R-3"R=3"R=1/2"TIP OUT SLOPE 3/4" PER FT.LAST REVISED:11/29/18FLUSH CURB AND GUTTERSI02-D12"8"20"SLOPE GUTTER TO MATCH(3/4" PER FT. TYP)TIP GUTTER OUT AS REQUIRED3" RADIUS1/2" RADIUS7"1/4" BACK8.5" COMMERCIAL/RETAIL SPACEFOOTPRINT = 47,200 SFFFE (HOSPITALITY) = 870.00FFE (OFFICE LOBBY) = 868.00FFE (LOADING DOCK) = 866.00MULTI-FAMILY HOUSINGBUILDING FOOTPRINT = 44,300 SFFFE (RESIDENTIAL) = 870.75PARKING RAMPFFE = 866.50GFE = 856.00GFE = 860.00GFE = 860.75GFE = 857.00TPUBLIC BIKE STORAGE / REPAIRPASS-THROUGHRAMP ACCESSPEDESTRIANRAMP ACCESSVEHICLEXXXXXXXXWAT CTVCTVCTVCTVCTV CTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVXXXXXX STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STO STOSTOSTOSTO ST OSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT70.00WEST 70TH STREET110N. LINE OF SEC. 32, TWP. 28, RGE. 24NW CORNER OF SEC. 32,70.00N89°50'44"E 505.00S00°11'54"E 496.57S89°48'06"W 524.96N00°12'08"W 476.97 28.27N44°49'18"EMT STSTSTSTSTSTSTTVTVHHTTTTSTO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSAABBBBBBBBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACCGGGEEEGGEKEEGEEGKEECCCBBBBBCCCBCBGGGBCBCBCBCBCBCGGEEGCBGCBCBCBCBCBCBCBCBGEBBBBBBBBGGGCBGKKEEECBGCBGCBCBCBCBCBCBCBCBCBCBGGGGGEEEEEEEEEEAABSEE US BANK DRAWINGSFOR CURRENT SITE PLANSBBBBBBCBCBCBCBCBCBCBLLLBOMBBMBAWALKCCIP PLANT BED CURBDCIP RETAINING WALLELIMESTONE FEATURESTREE GRATESFBENCH FEATURESGWASTE AND RECYCLINGHBIKE RACKSICANOPY/ PERGOLA FEATUREJSCULPTURAL/ ART MOMENTPLAN KEYNOTES:BPLANTING BEDKSTAIR W/HANDRAILSLMRETAINING WALLNSIGNAGEOTABLE AND CHAIRS CONCRETE PAVINGDECORATIVE PAVING ADECORATIVE PAVING BTURFPLANT BEDSTORM FILTRATION FEATURELANDSCAPE SITE PLAN HATCH LEGEND:SITE PLAN01L1.0 20'40'10'0'SCALE:1"=20'530 N THIRD ST, SUITE 120,MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55102PH: 612.333.3702 FAX: 515.288.8359www.thinkconfluence.comSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota9/10/2021 11:30:10 AM 220535JC TM70th & France70th & FranceEdina, MNPRELIMINARYDEVELOPMENTPLAN / PUD09/13/2021No.Description DateL1.0LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN COMMERCIAL/RETAIL SPACEFOOTPRINT = 47,200 SFFFE (HOSPITALITY) = 870.00FFE (OFFICE LOBBY) = 868.00FFE (LOADING DOCK) = 866.00MULTI-FAMILY HOUSINGBUILDING FOOTPRINT = 44,300 SFFFE (RESIDENTIAL) = 870.75PARKING RAMPFFE = 866.50GFE = 856.00GFE = 860.00GFE = 860.75GFE = 857.00TPROPOSED FINANCIALINSTITUTIONFOOTPRINT = 6,200 SFFFE = 866.00XXXXXXXXGAS GAS GAS GASFOFOFOFO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FO FO FO FOFOFOFO FO FO FO FO WAT GAS GAS GASCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOTUG TUGCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTV CTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVXXXXXXFO FO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOXXXX PUG PUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STOSTO STOSTOSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSTOWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWEST 70TH STREET110N. LINE OF SEC. 32, TWP. 28, RGE. 24N89°50'44"E 505.00S00°11'54"E 496.57S89°48'06"W 524.96N00°12'08"W 476.97 28.27N44°49'18"E EEEEEEEMGGGTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTSTTVTVHHTTTTSTO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSSEE US BANK DRAWINGSFOR CURRENTLANDSCAPE PLANSTREESQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMECONTCAL15 Sienna Glen Maple / Acer x freemanii `Sienna` TMB & B 2.5"Cal9 River Birch (Single Stem) / Betula nigraB & B 2.5"Cal9 Northern Acclaim Honey Locust / Gleditsia triacanthos inermis `Harve` TM B & B 8"4 Skyline Honey Locust / Gleditsia triacanthos `Skyline`B & B 4.5"Cal15 True North Kentucky Coffeetree / Gymnocladus dioica `UMNSynergy` TM B & B 5.5"Cal4 Prairie Gold Aspen / Populus tremuloides `NE Arb`B & B 2.5"Cal6 Greenspire Linden / Tilia cordata `Greenspire`B & B 4"Cal9American Elm / Ulmus americana `Princeton`B & B 3.5"CalEVERGREEN TREESQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMECONTCAL17 Pyramidal White Pine / Pinus strobus 'Fastigiata'B & BGROUND COVERSQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMECONT1,750 sf SOD xsod3,413 sf STORM FILTRATION PLANTINGSflatPerennial Plugs - Dip IrrigationPanicum Shenandoah (Red Switch Grass)/ P. virgatum `Shenandoah`Blue-Eyed Grass/ Sisyrinchium angustifoliumPLANT SCHEDULE - TREESUNDERSTORY PLANTING PALETTECONCRETE PAVINGDECORATIVE PAVING ADECORATIVE PAVING BTURFPLANT BEDSTORM FILTRATION FEATURELANDSCAPE SITE PLAN HATCH LEGEND:LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN1L1.1 20'40'10'0'SCALE:1"=20'530 N THIRD ST, SUITE 120,MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55102PH: 612.333.3702 FAX: 515.288.8359www.thinkconfluence.comSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota9/10/2021 11:30:10 AM 220535JC TM70th & France70th & FranceEdina, MNPRELIMINARYDEVELOPMENTPLAN / PUD09/13/2021No.Description DateL1.1LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN TURF @ PLANT BED04L2.01-1/2" - 1'-0"FINISHED GRADE AND EDGECONDITION VARIES - SEE PLANFOR CONDITION.3/16" METAL EDGERW/STAKE, PER SPEC.PLANT BED / GRASS MIXAREA MAY OCCUR, SEE PLAN.11EACH TREE SHALL BE PLANTED SUCHTHAT THE ROOT FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THETOP OF THE ROOT BALL. IF THE ROOTFLARE IS NOT VISIBLE, THE SOIL SHALL BEREMOVED IN A LEVEL MANNER FROM THEROOT BALL TO WHERE THE FIRST MAINORDER ROOT (12" DIA. OR LARGER)EMERGES FROM THE TRUNK. SET MAINORDER ROOT 1" HIGHER THAN ADJACENTGRADE. DO NOT COVER TOP OF ROOTBALL WITH SOIL.SCARIFY SIDES OF TREE PIT WITH SPADEBY HAND TO BIND WITH PREPARED SOIL.PLANTING PIT TO BE TWO TO FIVE TIMESTHE DIAMETER OF ROOT ALL, SLOPEDTAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASEFIRMLY WITH FOOT PRESSURE SO THATROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFT.DRAINAGE TRENCH AS REQUIRED PERPERCOLATION TEST IN SPEC. AUGER A 4"DIA. HOLE & FILL W/ 34" GRAVEL.PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED ORCOMPACTED SOIL.DIG PLANTING PIT 4-6" DEEPER THANROOTBALL.UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE.REMOVE BURLAP, WINE, ROPE ANDWIRE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOT BALL.COMPACT PLANTING SOIL TO85% OF MAXIMUM DRY UNITWEIGHT PER ASTM D 698.EDGE CONDITION VARIES, SEEPLAN.4" BUILT-UP EARTH SAUCERBEYOND EDGE OF ROOT BALL.3" SHREDDED HARDWOODMULCH. DO NOT PLACE MULCHIN CONTACT WITH ROOT FLARE.RODENT TRUNK PROTECTIONFOR DECIDUOUS TREES: 12"HARDWIRE-CLOTH MESHCYLINDER. DIMENSIONS: 8"DIAMETER (OR GREATER) X 36"HEIGHT. STAKE IN PLACE,AVOIDING ROOTS. SEE SPEC.TREE PLANTING DETAIL, TYP.01L2.01/2" = 1'-0"SEE PLAN12"MIN.PREPARE SOIL FORTHE ENTIRE BED4"3" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. DONOT PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITHSHRUB STEM.NOTE: SEE SPECIFICATION SECTIONRELATED TO EXTERIOR PLANTING.CONTAINER GROWN MATERIAL SHALLHAVE ROOTS HAND LOOSENED.MIN.4" DEEPER THAN ROOT BALL.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF ENTIREBED WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BIND WITHPLANTING SOIL.UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE.PLANTING DETAIL, TYP.02L2.01/2" = 1'-0"5' DIAMETER MULCH RING, TYP.12"12"12"12"12"PLANSECTION AFILTRATION BASIN SUBGRADE, SEE CIVILPLANTING SOIL MIX, SEE CIVIL FOR DEPTH,3" HARDWOOD MULCHPLUG, SEE MIX FOR SPECIESA'A1/2" SCALESTORM FEATURE PLUG LAYOUT03L2.01/2" = 1'-0"SEE PLAN SEE PLAN SEEPLANSE E PL A N PLANSECTION A'-AA'A530 N THIRD ST, SUITE 120,MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55102PH: 612.333.3702 FAX: 515.288.8359www.thinkconfluence.comSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FORC O N S T R U C T IO N I hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota9/10/2021 11:30:10 AM 220535JC TM70th & France70th & FranceEdina, MNPRELIMINARYDEVELOPMENTPLAN / PUD09/13/2021No.Description DateL2.0LANDSCAPE DETAILS Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 9/13/2021 7:31:15 PMA0.1 EXISTING SITE IMAGES 220535 Author Checker 70th & France 70th & France Edina, MN PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUD 09/13/2021 VIEW FROM SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SITE VIEW FROM EAST SIDE OF SITE LOOKING WEST VIEW FROM SOUTHWEST SIDE OF SITE LOOKING EAST VIEW FROM NORTHEAST CORNER OF SITE LOOKING NORTH VIEW FROM NORTHEAST CORNER OF SITE LOOKING EAST VIEW FROM SOUTH SIDE OF SITE LOOKING SOUTHEAST No. Description Date SITE B OFFICE / COMMERCIAL SITE A RESIDENTIAL TOWER SITE D BANK 70TH STREET W 71ST STREET W FRANCE AVE S EWING AVE SDREW AVE S51'-9" 68'-6"1 A0.61 2 A0.61 SITE C PARKING 13'-9"42'-5"290'-2"182'-0" 42'-0"159'-2"291'-6"138'-8"120'-7"180'-8" 198'-0"121'-4"36'-5"16'-0"6'-1" 7'-0"16'-0"16'-0"24'-0"24'-0" 6'-2"6'-0"20'-7"19'-5"10'-11"10'-5"12'-4"6'-2"8'-4"8'-6"20'-0"8'-6"8'-4"8'-0" 52'-1"12'-3"8'-6"9'-3"13'-0"14'-4"5'-9"12'-6"6'-3"8'-0"STREET ROOM TYPOLOGY 3: NEW LOCAL STREETSTREET ROOM TYPOLOGY 2: CORNELIA OVERLAY AT FRANCE AVESTREET ROOM TYPOLOGY 3: NEW LOCAL STREET STREET ROOM TYPOLOGY 4: Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 9/13/2021 7:59:22 PMA0.2 SITE PLAN 220535 Author Checker 70th & France 70th & France Edina, MN PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUD 09/13/2021 No. Description Date 2 WAY TRAFFIC PLUS PARKING +/- 68'-0" EWING AVE S FRANCE AVE SDREW AVE SPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINESTREET ROOM TYPOLOGY 2: CORNELIA OVERLAY AT FRANCE AVE STREET ROOM TYPOLOGY 3: NEW LOCAL STREET SETBACK TO CURB 50'-0" MIN. Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 9/13/2021 7:59:24 PMA0.3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - SITE 220535 JCG Checker 09/14/20 70th & France 70th & France Edina, MN PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUD 09/13/2021 1/16" = 1'-0"A0.3 1 NORTH SITE ELEVATION No. Description Date Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 9/13/2021 7:31:17 PMA0.4 EXTERIOR RENDERINGS 220535 ESG ESG 09/13/21 70th & France 70th & France Edina, MN PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUD 09/13/2021 No. Description Date Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 9/13/2021 8:05:39 PMA0.19-A PRELIMINARY SITE A METRICS 220535 Author Checker 09/02/21 70th & France 70th & France Edina, MN PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUD 09/13/2021 PRELIMINARY METRICS No. Description Date D 5 T5 A B.2 B.6A.1 A.6 C.2 C.7 T1 7 6 4 3 2 T2 T3 T4 RESIDENTIAL LOBBY & AMENITY LOADING TRASH/ RECYCLING MOVE IN UTILITY PARKINGENTRY/EXIT8 1 B C 4.96%UPDN34,977 SF PARKING 7,452 SF AMENITY 886 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 2,373 SF BOH 444 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 15' - 0"29' - 0"15' - 0"15' - 0"30' - 0"15' - 0"15' - 0"29' - 0"15' - 0" 178' - 0"2' - 0"26' - 4"18' - 10"27' - 6"27' - 6"27' - 6"27' - 6"27' - 6"2' - 1"30' - 0"28' - 6"30' - 0"13' - 1"1' - 10"286' - 4"HATCHED AREAS ILLUSTRATE SLOPED PT CONCRETE PARKING ENTRY/EXITOVERHEADDOORFLEXPARKINGFLEXPARKINGFLEXPARKINGROLLING OVERHEAD SCREEN OVERHEADDOOROVERHEADDOOROVERHEADGATEOVERHEADGATEOVERHEADGATEROLLING OVERHEAD SCREEN ROLLING OVERHEAD SCREEN 501 SF RETAIL 349 SF RETAIL 522 SF RETAIL OVERHEAD DOOR REFER TO LEVEL P0.5 FOR PARKING LAYOUT OVERHEADDOOR100'-0" 870.75' 100'-0" 100'-0" 870.75' 99'-3"100'-0"99'-3"100'-0"99'-3" 99'-3" 97'-9" 96'-3" 96'-3" 96'-3" 99'-3"1.80%2.50%2.50%4.06%DNDN DN 97'-9" 97'-9" 97'-0" 96'-6" 96'-3" 99'-0" 98'-6" 98'-0" T T 99'-6" 870.25' 99'-6" 870.25' D 5 T5 A B.2 B.6A.1 A.6 C.2 C.7 T1 7 6 4 3 T2 T3 T4 8 1 B C 41,034 SF PARKING 114'-0" 114'-0"112'-10 1/8" 107'-9"109'-10"109'-10"4.86%5%4.96%5.01%UPUPUP 6.94% UP 6.94%UPUP15' - 0"29' - 0"15' - 0"15' - 0"30' - 0"15' - 0"15' - 0"29' - 0"15' - 0" 178' - 0"2' - 0"26' - 4"18' - 10"27' - 6"27' - 6"27' - 6"27' - 6"27' - 6"2' - 1"30' - 0"28' - 6"30' - 0"13' - 1"1' - 10"286' - 4"2,575 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 1,161 SF 2BR 819 SF 1BR 938 SF 1BR+D 1,459 SF 2BR 1,149 SF 2BR 938 SF 1BR+D 880 SF ALC DATA/ELEC ELEV LOBBY TRASH MECH 938 SF 1BR+D 5 B.2 B.6 T1 7 6 4 3 2 T2 8 1 B C 91'-3" 11,265 SF PARKING PARKING ENTRY/EXIT (LEVEL 1)3.2%UPSignature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 9/13/2021 8:05:42 PMA0.20-A SITE A FLOOR PLANS 220535 70th & France 70th & France Edina, MN PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUD 09/13/2021 1/16" = 1'-0"A0.20-A 2 SITE 'A' LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN No. Description Date 1/16" = 1'-0"A0.20-A 3 SITE 'A' LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN 1/16" = 1'-0"A0.20-A 1 SITE 'A' LEVEL 0.5 FLOOR PLAN Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 9/13/2021 7:31:15 PMA0.1 EXISTING SITE IMAGES 220535 Author Checker 70th & France 70th & France Edina, MN PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUD 09/13/2021 VIEW FROM SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SITE VIEW FROM EAST SIDE OF SITE LOOKING WEST VIEW FROM SOUTHWEST SIDE OF SITE LOOKING EAST VIEW FROM NORTHEAST CORNER OF SITE LOOKING NORTH VIEW FROM NORTHEAST CORNER OF SITE LOOKING EAST VIEW FROM SOUTH SIDE OF SITE LOOKING SOUTHEAST No. Description Date SITE B OFFICE / COMMERCIAL SITE A RESIDENTIAL TOWER SITE D BANK 70TH STREET W 71ST STREET W FRANCE AVE S EWING AVE SDREW AVE S51'-9" 68'-6"1 A0.61 2 A0.61 SITE C PARKING 13'-9"42'-5"290'-2"182'-0" 42'-0"159'-2"291'-6"138'-8"120'-7"180'-8" 198'-0"121'-4"36'-5"16'-0"6'-1" 7'-0"16'-0"16'-0"24'-0"24'-0" 6'-2"6'-0"20'-7"19'-5"10'-11"10'-5"12'-4"6'-2"8'-4"8'-6"20'-0"8'-6"8'-4"8'-0" 52'-1"12'-3"8'-6"9'-3"13'-0"14'-4"5'-9"12'-6"6'-3"8'-0"STREET ROOM TYPOLOGY 3: NEW LOCAL STREETSTREET ROOM TYPOLOGY 2: CORNELIA OVERLAY AT FRANCE AVESTREET ROOM TYPOLOGY 3: NEW LOCAL STREET STREET ROOM TYPOLOGY 4: Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 9/13/2021 7:59:22 PMA0.2 SITE PLAN 220535 Author Checker 70th & France 70th & France Edina, MN PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUD 09/13/2021 No. Description Date 2 WAY TRAFFIC PLUS PARKING +/- 68'-0" EWING AVE S FRANCE AVE SDREW AVE SPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINESTREET ROOM TYPOLOGY 2: CORNELIA OVERLAY AT FRANCE AVE STREET ROOM TYPOLOGY 3: NEW LOCAL STREET SETBACK TO CURB 50'-0" MIN. Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 9/13/2021 7:59:24 PMA0.3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - SITE 220535 JCG Checker 09/14/20 70th & France 70th & France Edina, MN PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUD 09/13/2021 1/16" = 1'-0"A0.3 1 NORTH SITE ELEVATION No. Description Date Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 9/13/2021 7:31:17 PMA0.4 EXTERIOR RENDERINGS 220535 ESG ESG 09/13/21 70th & France 70th & France Edina, MN PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUD 09/13/2021 No. Description Date Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 9/13/2021 8:05:39 PMA0.19-A PRELIMINARY SITE A METRICS 220535 Author Checker 09/02/21 70th & France 70th & France Edina, MN PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUD 09/13/2021 PRELIMINARY METRICS No. Description Date D 5 T5 A B.2 B.6A.1 A.6 C.2 C.7 T1 7 6 4 3 2 T2 T3 T4 RESIDENTIAL LOBBY & AMENITY LOADING TRASH/ RECYCLING MOVE IN UTILITY PARKINGENTRY/EXIT8 1 B C 4.96%UPDN34,977 SF PARKING 7,452 SF AMENITY 886 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 2,373 SF BOH 444 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 15' - 0"29' - 0"15' - 0"15' - 0"30' - 0"15' - 0"15' - 0"29' - 0"15' - 0" 178' - 0"2' - 0"26' - 4"18' - 10"27' - 6"27' - 6"27' - 6"27' - 6"27' - 6"2' - 1"30' - 0"28' - 6"30' - 0"13' - 1"1' - 10"286' - 4"HATCHED AREAS ILLUSTRATE SLOPED PT CONCRETE PARKING ENTRY/EXITOVERHEADDOORFLEXPARKINGFLEXPARKINGFLEXPARKINGROLLING OVERHEAD SCREEN OVERHEADDOOROVERHEADDOOROVERHEADGATEOVERHEADGATEOVERHEADGATEROLLING OVERHEAD SCREEN ROLLING OVERHEAD SCREEN 501 SF RETAIL 349 SF RETAIL 522 SF RETAIL OVERHEAD DOOR REFER TO LEVEL P0.5 FOR PARKING LAYOUT OVERHEADDOOR100'-0" 870.75' 100'-0" 100'-0" 870.75' 99'-3"100'-0"99'-3"100'-0"99'-3" 99'-3" 97'-9" 96'-3" 96'-3" 96'-3" 99'-3"1.80%2.50%2.50%4.06%DNDN DN 97'-9" 97'-9" 97'-0" 96'-6" 96'-3" 99'-0" 98'-6" 98'-0" T T 99'-6" 870.25' 99'-6" 870.25' D 5 T5 A B.2 B.6A.1 A.6 C.2 C.7 T1 7 6 4 3 T2 T3 T4 8 1 B C 41,034 SF PARKING 114'-0" 114'-0"112'-10 1/8" 107'-9"109'-10"109'-10"4.86%5%4.96%5.01%UPUPUP 6.94% UP 6.94%UPUP15' - 0"29' - 0"15' - 0"15' - 0"30' - 0"15' - 0"15' - 0"29' - 0"15' - 0" 178' - 0"2' - 0"26' - 4"18' - 10"27' - 6"27' - 6"27' - 6"27' - 6"27' - 6"2' - 1"30' - 0"28' - 6"30' - 0"13' - 1"1' - 10"286' - 4"2,575 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 1,161 SF 2BR 819 SF 1BR 938 SF 1BR+D 1,459 SF 2BR 1,149 SF 2BR 938 SF 1BR+D 880 SF ALC DATA/ELEC ELEV LOBBY TRASH MECH 938 SF 1BR+D 5 B.2 B.6 T1 7 6 4 3 2 T2 8 1 B C 91'-3" 11,265 SF PARKING PARKING ENTRY/EXIT (LEVEL 1)3.2%UPSignature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 9/13/2021 8:05:42 PMA0.20-A SITE A FLOOR PLANS 220535 70th & France 70th & France Edina, MN PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUD 09/13/2021 1/16" = 1'-0"A0.20-A 2 SITE 'A' LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN No. Description Date 1/16" = 1'-0"A0.20-A 3 SITE 'A' LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN 1/16" = 1'-0"A0.20-A 1 SITE 'A' LEVEL 0.5 FLOOR PLAN D 5 T5 A B.2 B.6A.1 A.6 C.2 C.7 T1 7 6 4 3 2 T2 T3 T4 8 1 B C 41,034 SF PARKING 2,575 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 7.22%7.22%5.01%5.01%UP UPUPUP124'-0" 124'-0"124'-0" 121'-10"124'-0"124'-0" 15' - 0"29' - 0"15' - 0"15' - 0"30' - 0"15' - 0"15' - 0"29' - 0"15' - 0" 178' - 0"2' - 0"26' - 4"18' - 10"27' - 6"27' - 6"27' - 6"27' - 6"27' - 6"2' - 1"30' - 0"28' - 6"30' - 0"13' - 1"286' - 4"2' - 0"880 SF ALC 819 SF 1BR 938 SF 1BR+D 938 SF 1BR+D 1,459 SF 2BR 1,149 SF 2BR HATCHED AREAS ILLUSTRATE SLOPED PT CONCRETE 1,161 SF 2BR DATA/ELEC ELEV LOBBY TRASH MECH 938 SF 1BR+D D 5 T5 A B.2 B.6A.1 A.6 C.2 C.7 T1 7 6 4 3 2 T2 T3 T4 8 1 B C 2,575 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 37,015 SF PARKING (OPEN TO BELOW) 7.22%7.22%5.01%UP UPUP134'-0" 134'-0"134'-0" 131'-10"134'-0"134'-0" 15' - 0"29' - 0"15' - 0"15' - 0"30' - 0"15' - 0"15' - 0"29' - 0"15' - 0" 178' - 0"2' - 0"26' - 4"18' - 10"27' - 6"27' - 6"27' - 6"27' - 6"27' - 6"2' - 1"30' - 0"28' - 6"30' - 0"13' - 1"880 SF ALC 1,161 SF 2BR 1,327 SF 2BR 1,387 SF 2BR 1,148 SF 2BR HATCHED AREAS ILLUSTRATE SLOPED PT CONCRETE 1' - 10"286' - 4"DATA/ELEC ELEV LOBBY TRASH MECH UNIT TERRACEUNIT TERRACE 1,014 SF 1BR UNIT TERRACE Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 9/13/2021 8:05:43 PMA0.21-A SITE A FLOOR PLANS 220535 08/24/21 70th & France 70th & France Edina, MN PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUD 09/13/2021 No. Description Date 1/16" = 1'-0"A0.21-A 1 SITE 'A' LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN 1/16" = 1'-0"A0.21-A 2 SITE 'A' LEVEL 4 FLOOR PLAN 6 RESIDENTIAL AMENITY DECK RESIDENTIAL AMENITY UNOCCUPIABLE ROOF AREA 1,567 SF 2BR 1,014 SF 1BR+D 867 SF 1BR 783 SF 1BR 993 SF 1BR 1,383 SF 2BR 4,887 SF AMENITY 2,313 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 1,227 SF 2BR DATA/ELEC ELEV LOBBY TRASH PATHWAY TO EGRESS STAIR 573 SF ALC 783 SF 1BR 993 SF 1BR867 SF 1BR 1,014 SF 1BR+D 1,102 SF 2BR 573 SF ALC 977 SF 2BR 786 SF 1BR 846 SF 1BR 1,227 SF 2BR 513 SF ST 513 SF ST 2,275 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 573 SF ALC 1,383 SF 2BR DATA/ELEC ELEV LOBBY TRASH 1,958 SF PENTHOUSE 1,287 SF PENTHOUSE 1,823 SF PENTHOUSE 1,675 SF PENTHOUSE 2,118 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION DATA/ELEC ELEV LOBBY TRASH 783 SF 1BR 993 SF 1BR867 SF 1BR 1,014 SF 1BR+D 1,567 SF 2BR 573 SF ALC 977 SF 2BR 786 SF 1BR 847 SF 1BR 1,227 SF 2BR 513 SF ST 513 SF ST 2,275 SF COMMON / CIRCULATION 573 SF ALC 1,383 SF 2BR DATA/ELEC ELEV LOBBY TRASH 573 SF ALC Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 9/13/2021 8:05:45 PMA0.22-A SITE A FLOOR PLANS 220535 Author Checker 70th & France 70th & France Edina, MN PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUD 09/13/2021 1/16" = 1'-0"A0.22-A 1 LEVEL 5 FLOOR PLAN 1/16" = 1'-0"A0.22-A 2 LEVEL 6-21 FLOOR PLAN 1/16" = 1'-0"A0.22-A 3 LEVEL 22-24 FLOOR PLAN No. Description Date 1/16" = 1'-0"A0.22-A 4 'A' LEVEL L6 PRECAST PANEL GLAZED WALL SYSTEM METAL PERFORATED SCREEN AT PARKING (50% OPEN) 'A' LEVEL L1 870' - 9" 'A' LEVEL L2 114' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L3 124' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L4 134' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L5 144' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L6 156' - 0" TOWER 7 168' - 0" TOWER 8 177' - 8" TOWER 9 187' - 4" TOWER 11 206' - 8" TOWER 12 216' - 4" TOWER 13 226' - 0" TOWER 14 235' - 8" TOWER 15 245' - 4" TOWER 16 255' - 0" TOWER 17 264' - 8" TOWER 18 274' - 4" TOWER 19 284' - 0" TOWER 20 293' - 8" TOWER 21 303' - 4" TOWER 22 314' - 0" TOWER 24 335' - 4" TOWER ROOF UPPER 346' - 0" LEVEL 10 197' - 0"14' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"9' - 8"9' - 8"9' - 8"9' - 8"9' - 8"9' - 8"9' - 8"9' - 8"9' - 8"9' - 8"9' - 8"9' - 8"9' - 8"9' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"19' - 0".TOWER 23 324' - 8"BUILDING HEIGHT 265' - 0"TOWER SCREEN WALL 360' - 0" METAL PANEL GLAZED WALL SYSTEM WOOD-LOOK METAL PANEL PRECAST PANEL PRECAST PANEL BALCONY RAILING SYSTEM METAL PANEL MECHANICAL SCREENING GLAZED WINDOW SYSTEM MECHANICAL SCREENING Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 9/13/2021 8:05:45 PMA0.30-A SITE A ELEVATIONS 220535 ESG ESG 70th & France 70th & France Edina, MN PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUD 09/13/2021 1/16" = 1'-0"A0.30-A 1 EAST ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"A0.30-A 2 NORTH ELEVATION No. Description Date 'A' LEVEL L1 870' - 9" 'A' LEVEL L2 114' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L3 124' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L4 134' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L5 144' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L6 156' - 0" TOWER 7 168' - 0" TOWER 8 177' - 8" TOWER 9 187' - 4" TOWER 11 206' - 8" TOWER 12 216' - 4" TOWER 13 226' - 0" TOWER 14 235' - 8" TOWER 15 245' - 4" TOWER 16 255' - 0" TOWER 17 264' - 8" TOWER 18 274' - 4" TOWER 19 284' - 0" TOWER 20 293' - 8" TOWER 21 303' - 4" TOWER 22 314' - 0" TOWER 24 335' - 4" TOWER ROOF UPPER 346' - 0" 'A' LEVEL L0.5 96' - 3" LEVEL 10 197' - 0" TOWER 23 324' - 8"BUILDING HEIGHT 265' - 0"TOWER SCREEN WALL 360' - 0" METAL PERFORATED SCREEN AT PARKING (50% OPEN)19' - 0".10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"9' - 8"9' - 8"9' - 8"9' - 8"9' - 8"9' - 8"9' - 8"9' - 8"9' - 8"9' - 8"9' - 8"9' - 8"9' - 8"9' - 8"12' - 0"12' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"14' - 0"PRECAST PANEL GLAZED WALL SYSTEM METAL PANEL GLAZED WINDOW SYSTEM METAL PANEL METAL PERFORATED SCREEN AT PARKING (50% OPEN) BALCONY RAILING SYSTEM PRECAST PANEL GLAZING WINDOW SYSTEM METAL PANEL MECHANICAL SCREENING GLAZING WINDOW SYSTEM GLAZING GARAGE DOORS AT RETAIL SPACES PRECAST PANEL PRECAST PANEL BALCONY RAILING SYSTEM MECHANICAL SCREENING Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 9/13/2021 8:05:46 PMA0.31-A SITE A ELEVATIONS 220535 Author Checker 70th & France 70th & France Edina, MN PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUD 09/13/2021 1/16" = 1'-0"A0.31-A 1 SOUTH ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"A0.31-A 2 WEST ELEVATION No. Description Date Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 9/13/2021 8:05:46 PMA0.40-A SITE A EXTERIOR MATERIALS 220535 Author Checker 70th & France 70th & France Edina, MN PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN / PUD 09/13/2021 No. Description Date CONCRETE PANEL COLOR #1 CAST STONE PANEL - BASE METAL PANEL #1 PERFORATED METAL PANELS #1 -PARKING WOOD LOOK COLORED PANEL #1 MULLION CAPS PERFORATED METAL PANEL #2 -PARKING EXTERIOR GLASS ENCLOSURE HYBRID WINDOW WALL - SSG SYSTEM B6B4B3B2.1B.CB.EB.FB.JB.KB.BB.AB.D1A0.31-BB.GB1B.HB5B.IB2B3.112' - 0"42' - 8"19' - 9"6' - 0"40' - 0"12' - 0"44' - 1"176' - 6"SERVICESERVICESERVICESERVICERAMP UP TO L1PARKING12' - 6"36' - 0"36' - 0"36' - 0"36' - 0"36' - 0"36' - 0"24' - 0"12' - 0"21' - 0"285' - 6"B6B4B3B2.1B.CB.EB.FB.JB.KB.BB.AB.DB.GB1B.HB5B.IB2B3.112' - 0"42' - 8"19' - 9"6' - 0"40' - 0"12' - 0"44' - 1"176' - 6"12' - 6"36' - 0"36' - 0"36' - 0"36' - 0"36' - 0"36' - 0"24' - 0"12' - 0"21' - 0"285' - 6"RETAIL40,808 SFRAMP DOWN TO P1SERVICE / DOCK1,561 SF41' - 11 7/8"120' - 5"COURTYARD ENTRYSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense #DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota9/13/2021 7:29:29 PMA0.20-BSITE B FLOOR PLANS220535AuthorChecker09/08/2170th & France70th & FranceEdina, MNPRELIMINARYDEVELOPMENTPLAN / PUD09/13/2021No. DescriptionDate1/16" = 1'-0"A0.20-B1LEVEL P1 PLAN1/16" = 1'-0"A0.20-B2LEVEL 1 PLAN B6B4B3B2.1B.CB.EB.FB.JB.KB.BB.AB.DB.GB.HB5B.IB2B3.13' - 0"12' - 0"42' - 8"19' - 9"6' - 0"40' - 0"12' - 0"132' - 5"12' - 6"36' - 0"36' - 0"36' - 0"36' - 0"36' - 0"36' - 0"24' - 0"12' - 0"21' - 0"285' - 6"UTILITY PITPOTENTIAL ELEVATOR LOBBY126' - 4 3/16"ROOFOFFICE32,594 SFB6B4B3B2.1B.CB.EB.FB.JB.KB.BB.AB.DB.GB1B.HB5B.IB2B3.112' - 0"42' - 8"19' - 9"6' - 0"40' - 0"12' - 0"44' - 1"176' - 6"12' - 6"36' - 0"36' - 0"36' - 0"36' - 0"36' - 0"36' - 0"24' - 0"12' - 0"21' - 0"285' - 6"POTENTIAL ELEVATOR LOBBY126' - 5"258' - 6"OFFICE32,657 SFGREEN ROOFSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota9/13/2021 7:29:33 PMA0.21-BSITE B FLOOR PLANS220535Author Checker09/08/2170th & France70th & FranceEdina, MNPRELIMINARYDEVELOPMENTPLAN / PUD09/13/2021No. DescriptionDate1/16" = 1'-0"A0.21-B1LEVELS 2-3 PLAN1/16" = 1'-0"A0.21-B2LEVELS 4-6 PLAN B6B4B3B2.1B.CB.EB.FB.JB.BB.AB.D1A0.30-BB.G1A0.40-IB.HB5B.IB2B3.1ENCLOSED MECHANICAL AREAGREEN ROOF AREAGREEN ROOF AREAGREEN ROOF AREAAMENITY LEVEL10,370 SFOUTDOOR AMENITY DECK1,418 SF8' - 11"3' - 1"42' - 8"19' - 9"6' - 0"40' - 0"12' - 0"3' - 2"3' - 1"12' - 6"36' - 0"36' - 0"36' - 0"36' - 0"36' - 0"36' - 0"24' - 0"3' - 2"8' - 10"HOSPITALITY BAR1,674 SFROOFTOP FITNESS CENTER3,626 SFSMALL CONF. ROOM -217 SFEXECUTIVE CONFERENCE CENTER1,830 SF132' - 5"264' - 6"B6B4B3B2.1B.CB.EB.FB.JB.KB.BB.AB.DB.GB1B.HB5B.IB2B3.1LEVEL 4 GREEN ROOFLEVEL 1 ROOFENCLOSED MECHANICAL AREALEVEL 7 ROOFOUTDOOR AMENITY DECKLEVEL 2 ROOFLEVEL 8 ROOFL7 GREEN ROOFL7 GREEN ROOFL7 GREEN ROOF3' - 3"12' - 0"42' - 8"19' - 9"6' - 0"26' - 3"13' - 9"12' - 0"3' - 0"41' - 1"2' - 10"21' - 0"12' - 0"24' - 0"36' - 0"36' - 0"36' - 0"36' - 0"36' - 0"36' - 0"12' - 6"285' - 6"176' - 6"SignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota9/13/2021 7:29:38 PMA0.22-BSITE B FLOOR PLANS220535Author Checker09/10/2170th & France70th & FranceEdina, MNPRELIMINARYDEVELOPMENTPLAN / PUD09/13/2021No. DescriptionDate1/16" = 1'-0"A0.22-B1LEVEL 7 AMENITY1/16" = 1'-0"A0.22-B2ROOF PLAN LEVEL L1100' - 0"LEVEL L2124' - 0"LEVEL L3137' - 0"LEVEL L4150' - 0"LEVEL L5163' - 0"LEVEL L6176' - 0"LEVEL L096' - 0"LEVEL L7 (OFFICEROOF)189' - 0"LEVEL L8(PH ROOF)205' - 0"LEVEL 0.598' - 0"PODIUM HEIGHT26' - 0"METAL PANEL CLADDINGEXTERIOR GLASS ENCLOSURE107' - 0"16' - 0"13' - 0"13' - 0"13' - 0"13' - 0"13' - 0"2' - 0"2' - 0"METAL PANEL MECHANICAL SCREENMECHANICAL LOUVERSEXTERIOR GLASS ENCLOSUREMETAL PANEL ACCENTSRETAIL SIGNAGERETAIL SIGNAGESignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota9/13/2021 7:29:38 PMA0.30-BSITE B ELEVATIONS220535ESG ESG70th & France70th & FranceEdina, MNPRELIMINARYDEVELOPMENTPLAN / PUD09/13/20211" = 10'-0"A0.30-B1WEST ELEVATIONNo. DescriptionDate LEVEL L1100' - 0"LEVEL L2124' - 0"LEVEL L3137' - 0"LEVEL L4150' - 0"LEVEL L5163' - 0"LEVEL L6176' - 0"LEVEL L096' - 0"LEVEL L7 (OFFICEROOF)189' - 0"LEVEL L8(PH ROOF)205' - 0"LEVEL 0.598' - 0"2' - 0"2' - 0"13' - 0"13' - 0"13' - 0"13' - 0"13' - 0"16' - 0"107' - 0"PODIUM HEIGHT26' - 0"METAL PANEL CLADDINGEXTERIOR GLASS ENCLOSUREMETAL PANEL MECHANICAL SCREENMETAL PANEL ACCENTEXTERIOR GLASS ENCLOSURERETAIL SIGNAGERETAIL SIGNAGESignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota9/13/2021 7:29:38 PMA0.31-BSITE B ELEVATIONS220535JCG ESG70th & France70th & FranceEdina, MNPRELIMINARYDEVELOPMENTPLAN / PUD09/13/20211" = 10'-0"A0.31-B1NORTH ELEVATIONNo. DescriptionDate LEVEL L1100' - 0"LEVEL L2124' - 0"LEVEL L3137' - 0"LEVEL L4150' - 0"LEVEL L5163' - 0"LEVEL L6176' - 0"LEVEL L096' - 0"LEVEL L7 (OFFICEROOF)189' - 0"LEVEL L8(PH ROOF)205' - 0"LEVEL 0.598' - 0"16' - 0"13' - 0"13' - 0"13' - 0"13' - 0"13' - 0"2' - 0"2' - 0"107' - 0"PODIUM HEIGHT26' - 0"METAL PANEL CLADDINGEXTERIOR GLASS ENCLOSUREEXTERIOR GLASS ENCLOSUREFEATURE ENTRY CANOPYMETAL PANEL CLADDINGMETAL PANEL ACCENTSEXTERIOR GLASS ENCLOSURECANOPYRETAILRETAIL SIGNAGESignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota9/13/2021 7:29:38 PMA0.32-BSITE B ELEVATIONS220535JCG ESG70th & France70th & FranceEdina, MNPRELIMINARYDEVELOPMENTPLAN / PUD09/13/20211" = 10'-0"A0.32-B1EAST ELEVATIONNo. DescriptionDate LEVEL L1100' - 0"LEVEL L2124' - 0"LEVEL L3137' - 0"LEVEL L4150' - 0"LEVEL L5163' - 0"LEVEL L6176' - 0"LEVEL L096' - 0"LEVEL L7 (OFFICEROOF)189' - 0"LEVEL L8(PH ROOF)205' - 0"LEVEL 0.598' - 0"PODIUM HEIGHT26' - 0"107' - 0"16' - 0"13' - 0"13' - 0"13' - 0"13' - 0"13' - 0"2' - 0"METAL PANEL CLADDINGGLASS EXTERIOR ENCLOSUREMETAL PANEL MECHANICAL SCREENFEATURE ENTRY CANOPYGLASS EXTERIOR ENCLOSUREMETAL PANEL ACCENTSRETAIL SIGNAGESignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota9/13/2021 7:29:38 PMA0.33-BSITE B ELEVATIONS220535JCG ESG70th & France70th & FranceEdina, MNPRELIMINARYDEVELOPMENTPLAN / PUD09/13/20211" = 10'-0"A0.33-B1SOUTH ELEVATIONNo. DescriptionDate SignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota9/13/2021 7:29:38 PMA0.40-BSITE B EXTERIOR MATERIALS220535JCG ESG70th & France70th & FranceEdina, MNPRELIMINARYDEVELOPMENTPLAN / PUD09/13/2021EXTERIOR GLASS ENCLOSUREHYBRID WINDOW WALL - SSG SYSTEMWOOD LOOK - OFFICE SOFFITNo. DescriptionDateMETAL PANEL @ GRADEMETAL PANEL CLADDINGMETAL PANEL ACCENT The CITY ofEDINA Ordinance Amendment to an existing PUD – 7001 & 7025 France Ave. The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 2 The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 3 The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 4 8 Site Site The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 5 Approved Plan The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 6 Approved Plan The CITY ofEDINAApproved Plan EdinaMN.gov 7 The approved plans were to tear down the existing 66,200 square foot office and bank, and build the following:  A one-story, 24-foot tall 6,500 s.f. US Bank with drive-through (Phase 1);  A 24-Story, 282-foot tall 270-unit apartment with 5,000 s.f. of retail;  A 10-story, 146-foot tall, 190,000 s.f. office/retail building; and  A 9-story, 90-foot, 110-unit apartment building. The CITY ofEDINAProposed Revised Plan EdinaMN.gov 8 The revised plans have slightly reduced the size of the project by eliminating the 9-story apartment building to build the following (See the attached approved plans.):  A one-story, 24-foot tall 6,500 s.f. US Bank with drive-through (Phase 1-no changes proposed to the bank);  A 24-Story, 270-foot tall 267-unit apartment with 1,500 s.f. of retail;  A 6-7-story, 105-foot tall, 189,430 s.f. office/retail building; and  An 8 level, freestanding 540-stall parking ramp with a 1,300 s.f bike facility The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 9 The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 10 The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 11 The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 12 The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 13 The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 14 The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 15 The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 16 The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 17 The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 18 The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 19 The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 20 The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 21 The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 22 The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 23 The CITY ofEDINARequest Requires: www.EdinaMN.gov 24 A Zoning Ordinance Amendment to revise the PUD-17 Zoning District; and An amendment to the Overall Development Plan. The CITY ofEDINAReview of the Site Plan EdinaMN.gov 25 The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 26 Vehicle Access Delivery/Loading Approved Plan The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 27 Delivery/Loading Vehicle Access The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 28 City Standard (PUD)Proposed Building Setbacks Front –France Avenue Front –70th Street Side –East Side –South 50 feet –Lot 1 (measured to curb) 18-28 feet (measured to curb) 35 feet 10 feet 50 feet (measured to curb) 18-28 feet (measured to curb) 35 feet 10 feet Building Height 1, 9, 10 & 24 stories 1, 7, 8 and 24 stories Density 90-150 units per acre (5.7 acres)47 units per acre Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 2.1%2.1% Parking Retail/Office = 780 spaces Residential = 267 enclosed spaces (1,048 stalls required) (23 for the bank –phase 1) 1,170 spaces total required (Based on previously approved project) 1,112 spaces total* (23 for the bank –phase 1) The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 29 The CITY ofEDINAPublic Benefits Delivered -Greater Southdale Plan –District Parking (p 113) TIF Discussion Items -7001 France Ave -DRAFT 30 The CITY ofEDINAPrimary Issues Are the proposed changes to the approved Overall Development Plan reasonable to justify amending the PUD rezoning for this site? EdinaMN.gov 31 The CITY ofEDINAPUD Justification EdinaMN.gov 32 Yes. Staff does support the revised PUD, for the following reasons: 1. While the plans are more flawed that the previously approved plans, they still do generally address the Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines. Highlights continue to include: The division of the property into smaller blocks and the provision of pedestrian and vehicle access and connections through the site to adjacent properties to the east and south; increasing the public realm on the site with small park space and sidewalks on the perimeter and through the site; having no surface parking stalls visible from 70th or France Avenue. Conditions can be placed on the request to better align with the Guidelines, such as building and building material enhancements and closer adherence to the Street Typology on 70th Street. 2. The revised plans reduce height on the corner of 70th and France and reduced the residential density from 370 to 267 units. The CITY ofEDINAPUD Justification EdinaMN.gov 33 3. The provision of public space still makes up 26% of the site. This includes 1.2 acres consisting of the internal sidewalks and drive aisles, a 7,500 square foot public/park space south of the residential tower available to the public. 4. The pedestrian experience along Ewing would be improved compared to the approved plan with the elimination of the parking garage entrances on both sides of the street. There would be no car/pedestrian conflict along these sidewalks. The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 34 The CITY ofEDINABetter Together Edina EdinaMN.gov 35 The CITY ofEDINARecommendation: CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT NOON ON NOVEMBER 8 & CONTINUE ACTION TO NOVEMBER 16 www.EdinaMN.gov 36 The CITY ofEDINARecommendation EdinaMN.gov 37 The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 38 The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 39 The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 40 The CITY ofEDINA EdinaMN.gov 41 Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:Resolution 2021-99: Establishing Eden Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution 2021-99 establishing the Eden Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District. INTRODUCTION: Staff presented an overview of the proposal and a public hearing was held on October 19, 2021 regarding the potential creation of the Eden/Willson TIF District. Hennepin County and Edina Public School District officials were notified of this public hearing in advance. City staff met with a group of neighbors to discuss the potential scope of the roadway improvement projects that might be funded as part of the proposed TIF Plan. In addition to the public hearing, additional public input was collected using the Better Together and is included in the packet. Staff recommends this resolution be approved. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-99: Establishing Eden Willson TIF District TIF Plan Staff Presentation Oct 19 Better Together Public Hearing Comments Staff Presentation Resolution Staff Presentation Nov. 3 CITY OF EDINA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA Councilmember ______________________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 2021-99 ESTABLISHING THE EDEN WILLSON REDEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The Board of Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA") have heretofore established the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area (the "Project Area") and adopted a Redevelopment Plan therefore. It has been proposed by the HRA and the City that the City approve and the HRA adopt a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area (the "Redevelopment Plan Modification") and a Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF Plan") for the establishment of the Eden Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District (the "TIF District") therein (the Redevelopment Plan Modification and the TIF Plan are referred to collectively herein as the "Plans"); all pursuant to and in conformity with applicable law, including Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 and Sections 469.174 to 469.1794, all inclusive, as amended, (the "Act") all as reflected in the Plans, and presented for the Council's consideration. 1.02. The HRA and City have investigated the facts relating to the Plans and have caused the Plans to be prepared. 1.03. The HRA and City will have performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the establishment of the TIF District and the adoption and approval of the proposed Plans, including, but not limited to, notification of Hennepin County and Independent School District No. 273 having taxing jurisdiction over the property within the TIF District, a review of and written comment on the Plans by the City Planning Commission, approval of the Plans by the HRA on October 14, 2021, and the holding of a public hearing upon published notice as required by law. 1.04. Certain written reports (the ''Reports") relating to the Plans and to the activities contemplated therein have heretofore been prepared by staff and consultants and submitted to the Council and/or made a part of the City files and proceedings on the Plans. The Reports include data, information and/or substantiation constituting or relating to the basis for the other findings and determinations made in this resolution. The Council hereby confirms, ratifies and adopts the Reports, which are hereby incorporated into and made as fully a part of this resolution to the same extent as if set forth in full herein. 1.05. The City is not modifying the boundaries of the Project Area, but is, however, modifying the Redevelopment Plan to include activities related to the TIF District. Resolution 2021-99 Page 2 Section 2. Findings for the Adoption and Approval of the Redevelopment Plan Modification. 2.01. The Council approves the Redevelopment Plan Modification, and specifically finds that: (a) the land within the Project Area would not be available for redevelopment without the financial aid to be sought under this Redevelopment Plan; (b) the Redevelopment Plan, as modified, will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Project Area by private enterprise; and (c) that the Redevelopment Plan, as modified, conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. Section 3. Findings for the Establishment of the TIF District. 3.01. The Council hereby finds that the TIF District is in the public interest and is a "redevelopment district" under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. 10 of the Act. 3.02. The Council further finds that the proposed redevelopment would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the TIF District permitted by the TIF Plan. 3.03. The Council finds that the TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the City as a whole; and that the TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the redevelopment or development of the TIF District by private enterprise. 3.04. The Council further finds, declares and determines that the City made the above findings stated in this Section and has set forth the reasons and supporting facts for each determination in writing, attached hereto as Exhibit A. 3.05. The HRA elects to calculate fiscal disparities for the TIF District in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subd. 3, clause b, which means the fiscal disparities contribution would be taken from inside the TIF District. Section 4. Public Purpose. 4.01. The adoption of the Plans conforms in all respects to the requirements of the Act and will help fulfill a need to develop an area of the City which is already built up, to provide housing and employment opportunities, to improve the tax base and to improve the general economy of the State and thereby serves a public purpose. For the reasons described in Exhibit A, the City believes these benefits directly derive from the tax increment assistance provided under the TIF Plan. A private developer will receive only the assistance needed to make the development financially feasible. As such, any private benefits received by a property owner are incidental and do not outweigh the primary public benefits. Section 5. Approval and Adoption of the Plans. 5.01. The Plans, as presented to the Council on this date, including without limitation the findings and statements of objectives contained therein, are hereby approved, ratified, established, and adopted and shall be placed on file in the office of the HRA Executive Director. Resolution 2021-99 Page 3 5.02. The staff of the City, the City's advisors and legal counsel are authorized and directed to proceed with the implementation of the Plans and to negotiate, draft, prepare and present to this Council for its consideration all further plans, resolutions, documents and contracts necessary for this purpose. 5.03 The Auditor of Hennepin County is requested to certify the original net tax capacity of the TIF District, as described in the Plans, and to certify in each year thereafter the amount by which the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased; and the HRA is authorized and directed to forthwith transmit this request to the County Auditor in such form and content as the Auditor may specify, together with a list of all properties within the TIF District, for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding the adoption of this resolution. 5.04. The HRA Executive Director is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the Plans with the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Revenue and the Office of the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.175, Subd. 4a. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council member ______________________, and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: _________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ and the following voted against the same: _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ Dated: November 3, 2021 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of November 3, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of________________________, 2021. _______________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Resolution 2021-99 Page 4 EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2021-99 The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Eden Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District, as required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 are as follows: 1. Finding that the Eden Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District is a redevelopment district as defined in M.S., Section 469.174, Subdivision 10. The District consists of two (2) parcels within the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and their internal and external rights-of-way, abutting roadways and intersections, pedestrian pathways and crossings, all with plans to redevelop the area for redevelopment and construction of a mixed-use apartment and retail building. Parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area of the District are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures and more than 50 percent of the buildings in the District, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance. (See Appendix D of the TIF Plan.) 2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the TIF Plan. The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future: This finding is supported by the fact that the activities proposed in the TIF Plan meets the City's objectives for redevelopment. The existing property contains substandard buildings whose renovation requires high costs related to demolition, remediation and reconstruction of infrastructure. The redevelopment also requires substantial investment toward public improvements such as local transportation and utility infrastructure and shared public parking. The combination of limited amounts of property available for expansion adjacent to the existing redevelopment site, height/density limitations, and the public and private cost of financing the proposed improvements which are essential to the comprehensive redevelopment of the area, this project is feasible only through assistance, in part, from tax increment financing. The developer provided a proforma outlining project sources and uses as well as projected rent, vacancy and financing assumptions. City staff and the City’s financial advisor reviewed the information and have determined that the project is not feasible without assistance due to anticipated rent levels and market returns not supporting the redevelopment costs for this site. The term of assistance for the redevelopment project is expected to be less than the maximum 26-year term of a redevelopment district. The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the TIF Plan: This finding is justified on the grounds that the development intensity and tax base created on currently underutilized and declining property requires site and public improvement costs that are improbable without public assistance. Specifically, the cost of site preparation, Resolution 2021-99 Page 5 demolition, remediation, and public improvements to include transportation and utility infrastructure will add significantly to the total redevelopment cost of any development in this area. Site and public improvements costs necessary to sustain the approved density have made redevelopment infeasible without tax increment assistance. The City reasonably determines that no other redevelopment of similar scope is anticipated on this site without substantially similar assistance being provided to the development. Therefore, the City concludes as follows: a. The City's estimate of the amount by which the market value of the entire District will increase without the use of tax increment financing is $0. b. If the proposed development occurs, the total estimated increase in taxable market value will be $51,721,500. c. The present value of tax increments from the District for the maximum duration of the district permitted by the TIF Plan is estimated to be $12,043,964. d. Even if some development other than the proposed development were to occur, the Council finds that no alternative would occur that would produce a taxable market value increase greater than $39,677,536 (the amount in clause b less the amount in clause c) without tax increment assistance. 3. Finding that the TIF Plan for the Eden Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole. The Planning Commission reviewed the TIF Plan on October 13, 2021 and approved Resolution PC-B-21-31 to provide written opinion affirming that the TIF Plan conforms to the general development plan of the City. 4. Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Eden Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area by private enterprise. Through the implementation of the TIF Plan, the City will provide an impetus for the construction of a new mixed-use private development which will result in increased employment in the City and the State of Minnesota, the renovation of substandard properties, increased tax base of the State and add a high-quality development to the City.   Public Hearing Date: October 19, 2021 Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota Modification to the Redevelopment Plan Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area & Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Plan Establishment of Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District (a redevelopment district) BUILDING COMMUNITIES. IT’S WHAT WE DO. Prepared by: Ehlers 3060 Centre Pointe Drive Roseville, Minnesota 55113 TABLE OF CONTENTS Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area 1  FOREWORD 1  MUNICIPAL ACTION TAKEN 1  Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 4  FOREWORD 4  STATUTORY AUTHORITY 4  STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES 4  REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OVERVIEW 5  DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY IN THE DISTRICT AND PROPERTY TO BE ACQUIRED 5  DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION 6  DURATION & FIRST YEAR OF DISTRICT’S TAX INCREMENT 6  ORIGINAL TAX CAPACITY, TAX RATE & ESTIMATED CAPTURED NET TAX CAPACITY VALUE/INCREMENT & NOTIFICATION OF PRIOR PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS 7  SOURCES OF REVENUE/BONDS TO BE ISSUED 8  USES OF FUNDS 9  FISCAL DISPARITIES ELECTION 10  ESTIMATED IMPACT ON OTHER TAXING JURISDICTIONS 10  SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION 13  DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION 14  Appendix A: Map of Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and the TIF District A  Appendix B: Estimated Cash Flow for the District  B Appendix C: Findings Including But/For Qualifications  C Appendix D: Redevelopment Qualifications for the District  D Appendix E: Project Description  E   Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 1 Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area FOREWORD The following text represents a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. This modification represents a continuation of the goals and objectives set forth in the Redevelopment Plan for Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area originally adopted September 29, 1977, and modified from time to time. Generally, the substantive changes include the establishment of the Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District. MUNICIPAL ACTION TAKEN Based upon the statutory authority described in the Redevelopment Plan, the public purpose findings by the City Council and for the purpose of fulfilling the City’s development objects as set forth in the Redevelopment Plan, the City Council has created, established and designated the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan pursuant to and in accordance with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.001 to 469.047. The original and amended Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan documents designated the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan as a redevelopment project and also a tax increment financing plan for tax increment districts created prior to 1988. The Centennial Lakes Tax Increment Financing District was created in 1988 pursuant to Tax Increment Financing Plan 88-1, which was subsequently renamed the Centennial Lakes Tax Increment District and referred to by Hennepin County as District #1203 and #1249. For purposes of clarification, this modification will refer to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.002. The following municipal action has been taken with regard to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan: September 29, 1977: The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina (the “HRA”) approved the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan. October 5, 1981: The Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan was amended to identify project costs and bonded indebtedness incurred to finance those costs.   Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 2 May 6, 1985: The HRA and the City approved an amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan which establishes an interest reduction program and enlarges the project area to include the “1985 Project Area.” August 19, 1985: The HRA and the City approved the First Amendment to the 1985 Amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan to enlarge the 1985 Project Area and authorize the issuance of additional bonds to acquire land within the enlarged 1985 Project Area. 1987: The HRA and City approved the 1987 Amendments to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan to enlarge the project area to include the 1987 Project Area. 1988: The HRA and City approved the 1988 Amendments to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan to provide an Interest Reduction Program in the amount of $2,500,000 to assist in the financing and construction of housing units and authorize the HRA and City to incur additional bonded indebtedness. February 21, 2012: The HRA and City expand the Southeast Edina Project Area. April 17, 2012: The HRA and City establish the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District. February 18, 2014: The HRA and City establish the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District. March 2, 2016: The HRA and City establish the Grandview 2 Tax Increment Financing District. April 5, 2016: The HRA and City modify the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District and establish the 66 West Tax Increment Financing District. June 20, 2017: The HRA and City establish the 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District. October 16, 2018: The HRA and City establish the 44th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District. November 20, 2018: The HRA and City modify the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District to increase the TIF Budget and enable special legislative pooling authority for affordable housing. November 20, 2018: The HRA and City also establish the West 76th Street Tax Increment Financing District. March 19, 2019: The HRA and City establish the 72nd and France Tax Increment Financing District.   Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 3 December 17, 2019: The HRA and City modify the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District to designate property to be acquired and establish the Amundson Avenue Tax Increment Financing District. August 4, 2021: The HRA and City establish the 4040 West 70th Street Tax Increment Financing District. September 9, 2021: The HRA and City modify the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District to increase the estimated project costs expected to be paid or financed with tax increment from the Southdale 2 TIF District, to include affordable housing project costs. (As Modified October 19, 2021) October 19, 2021: The HRA and City establish the Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District. For further information, a review of the Redevelopment Plan for Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, is recommended. It is available from the HRA Executive Director at the City of Edina. Other relevant information is contained in the Tax Increment Financing Plans for the Tax Increment Financing Districts located within the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area.   Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 4 Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District FOREWORD The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA"), the City of Edina (the "City"), staff and consultants have prepared the following information to expedite the establishment of the Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District (the "District"), a redevelopment tax increment financing district, located in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. STATUTORY AUTHORITY Within the City, there exist areas where public involvement is necessary to cause development or redevelopment to occur. To this end, the HRA and City have certain statutory powers pursuant to Minnesota Statutes ("M.S."), Sections 469.001 - 469.047, inclusive, as amended (the “HRA Act”), and M.S., Sections 469.174 to 469.1794, inclusive, as amended (the "Tax Increment Financing Act" or "TIF Act"), to assist in financing public costs related to this project. This section contains the Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF Plan") for the District. Other relevant information is contained in the Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, originally adopted September 29, 1977, and modified from time to time. STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES The District currently consists of two (2) parcels of land inclusive of internal and external rights-of-way, abutting roadways and intersections, pedestrian pathways and crossings depicted within the map contained in Appendix A. The District is being created to facilitate redevelopment of the 4917 Eden Avenue site including construction of a new mixed use apartment and retail redevelopment and associated public improvements in the City. Please see Appendix E for further District information. The HRA anticipates entering into an agreement with Eden Avenue Group, LLC as the developer. Development is anticipated to begin in 2022. This TIF Plan is expected to achieve many of the objectives outlined in the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area.   Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 5 The activities contemplated in the Modification to the Redevelopment Plan and the TIF Plan do not preclude the undertaking of other qualified development or redevelopment activities. These activities are anticipated to occur over the life of Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and the District. REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OVERVIEW Pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan and authorizing state statutes, the HRA or City is authorized to undertake the following activities in the District: 1. Property to be Acquired – The HRA or City currently owns one parcel of property within the District. The remaining property located within the District may be acquired by the HRA or City and is further described in this TIF Plan. 2. Relocation - Relocation services, to the extent required by law, are available pursuant to M.S., Chapter 117 and other relevant state and federal laws. 3. Upon approval of a developer's plan relating to the project and completion of the necessary legal requirements, the HRA or City may sell to a developer selected properties that it may acquire within the District or may lease land or facilities to a developer. 4. The HRA or City may perform or provide for some or all necessary acquisition, construction, relocation, demolition, and required utilities and public street work within the District. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY IN THE DISTRICT AND PROPERTY TO BE ACQUIRED The District encompasses property identified by the parcels listed below, inclusive of adjacent rights-of-way, pedestrian pathways and crossing, and abutting roadways and intersections. Parcel number Address Owner 1802824320023 4917 Eden Avenue Eden Ventures 1802824320029 4918 and 4920 Eden Avenue* City of Edina * As depicted in Appendix A, the District will include only the portion of parcel #18-028-24-32-0029 west of Grange Road. Please also see the map in Appendix A for further information on the location of the District.   Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 6 The HRA or City may acquire any parcel within the District including interior and adjacent street rights-of-way. Any properties identified for acquisition will be acquired by the HRA or City only in order to accomplish one or more of the following: storm sewer improvements; provide land for needed public streets and sidewalks, utilities and facilities; carry out land acquisition, site improvements, clearance and/or development to accomplish the uses and objectives set forth in this plan. The HRA or City may acquire property by gift, dedication, condemnation or direct purchase from willing sellers in order to achieve the objectives of this TIF Plan. Such acquisitions will be undertaken only when there is assurance of funding to finance the acquisition and related costs. The HRA or City currently owns one parcel of the property to be included in the District. DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION The HRA and City, in determining the need to create a tax increment financing district in accordance with the TIF Act find that the District, to be established, is a redevelopment district pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 10(a)(1). $ The District consists of two (2) parcels. $ An inventory shows that parcels consisting of more than 70 percent of the area in the District are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures. $ An inspection of the buildings located within the District finds that more than 50 percent of the buildings are structurally substandard as defined in the TIF Act. (See Appendix D). Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 7, the District does not contain any parcel or part of a parcel that qualified under the provisions of M.S., Sections 273.111, 273.112, or 273.114 or Chapter 473H for taxes payable in any of the five calendar years before the filing of the request for certification of the District. DURATION & FIRST YEAR OF DISTRICT’S TAX INCREMENT Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 1, and Section 469.176, Subd. 1, the duration and first year of tax increment of the District must be indicated within the TIF Plan. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 1b., the duration of the District will be 25 years after receipt of the first increment by the HRA or City (a total of 26 years of tax increment). The HRA or City elects to receive the first tax increment in 2025, which is no later than four years following the year of approval of the District.   Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 7 Thus, it is estimated that the District, including any modifications of the TIF Plan for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate after 2050, or when the TIF Plan is satisfied. The HRA or City reserves the right to decertify the District prior to the legally required date. ORIGINAL TAX CAPACITY, TAX RATE & ESTIMATED CAPTURED NET TAX CAPACITY VALUE/INCREMENT & NOTIFICATION OF PRIOR PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 7 and M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, the Original Net Tax Capacity (ONTC) as certified for the District will be based on the market values placed on the property by the assessor in 2021 for taxes payable 2022. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subds. 1 and 2, the County Auditor shall certify in each year (beginning in the payment year 2025) the amount by which the original value has increased or decreased as a result of: 1. Change in tax exempt status of property; 2. Reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the district; 3. Change due to adjustments, negotiated or court-ordered abatements; 4. Change in the use of the property and classification; 5. Change in state law governing class rates; or 6. Change in previously issued building permits. In any year in which the current Net Tax Capacity (NTC) value of the District declines below the ONTC, no value will be captured and no tax increment will be payable to the HRA or City. The Original Local Tax Rate for the District will be the local tax rate for taxes payable 2022, assuming the request for certification is made before June 30, 2022). The estimated ONTC and the Original Local Tax Rate for the District appear in the table below. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174 Subd. 4 and M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, 2, and 4, the estimated Captured Net Tax Capacity (CTC) of the District, within Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, upon completion of the District, will annually approximate tax increment revenues as shown in the table below. The HRA and City request 100 percent of the available increase in tax capacity for repayment of its obligations and current expenditures, beginning in the tax year payable 2025. The Project Tax Capacity (PTC) listed is an estimate of values when the projects within the District are completed.   Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 8 Estimated Project Tax Capacity (PTC) 887,151 Less: Estimated Original Net Tax Capacity (ONTC 38,495 Less: Fiscal Disparities 8,351 Estimated Captured Tax Capacity (CTC)840,304 Estimated Original Local Tax Rate 107.8580%Pay 2021 Estimated Annual Tax Increment (CTC x Rate)$906,335 Percent Retained by the HRA 100% Project Tax Capacity Note: Estimated PTC includes a 1% inflation factor for the duration of the District and is the estimated tax capacity of the District in year 25. The tax capacity of the District in year one is estimated to be 691,772. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 4, the HRA shall, after a due and diligent search, accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor or its notice of the District enlargement pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 4, with a listing of all properties within the District or area of enlargement for which building permits have been issued during the eighteen (18) months immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan by the municipality pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 3. The County Auditor shall increase the original net tax capacity of the District by the net tax capacity of improvements for which a building permit was issued. The City is reviewing the area to be included in the District to determine if any building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan. SOURCES OF REVENUE/BONDS TO BE ISSUED The total estimated tax increment revenues for the District are shown in the table below: SOURCES Tax Increment 20,668,426$ Interest 2,066,843 TOTAL 22,735,269$ The costs outlined in the Uses of Funds will be financed primarily through the annual collection of tax increments. The HRA or City reserves the right to incur bonds or other indebtedness as a result of the TIF Plan. As presently proposed, the projects within the District will be financed by a pay-as-you-go note, interfund loans, and/or a possible bond issue. Any refunding amounts will be deemed a budgeted cost without a formal TIF Plan Modification.   Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 9 This provision does not obligate the HRA or City to incur debt. The HRA or City will issue bonds or incur other debt only upon the determination that such action is in the best interest of the City. The HRA or City may issue bonds (as defined in the TIF Act) secured in whole or in part with tax increments from the District in a maximum principal amount of $14,934,231. Such bonds may be in the form of pay-as-you-go notes, revenue bonds or notes, general obligation bonds, or interfund loans. This estimate of total bonded indebtedness is a cumulative statement of authority under this TIF Plan as of the date of approval. USES OF FUNDS Currently under consideration for the District is a proposal to facilitate redevelopment of the property into a mixed-use apartment and commercial retail building and necessitated public infrastructure improvements. The HRA and City have determined that it will be necessary to provide assistance to the project(s) for certain District costs, as described. The HRA has studied the feasibility of the development or redevelopment of property in and around the District. To facilitate the establishment and development or redevelopment of the District, this TIF Plan authorizes the use of tax increment financing to pay for the cost of certain eligible expenses. The estimate of public costs and uses of funds associated with the District is outlined in the following table. These estimates establish the maximum amount permitted to be expended, but the HRA and City is not obligated to expend the full amount. USES Land/Building Acquisition 3,000,000$ Site Improvements/Preparation 750,000 Affordable Housing 2,066,843 Utilities 1,500,000 Other Qualifying Improvements 5,550,545 Administrative Costs (up to 10%)2,066,843 PROJECT COSTS TOTAL 14,934,231$ Interest 7,801,038 PROJECT AND INTEREST COSTS TOTAL 22,735,269$ The total project cost, including financing costs (interest) listed in the table above does not exceed the total projected tax increments for the District as shown in the Sources of Revenue section.   Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 10 Estimated costs associated with the District are subject to change among categories without a modification to this TIF Plan. The cost of all activities to be considered for tax increment financing will not exceed, without formal modification, the budget above pursuant to the applicable statutory requirements. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 2, no more than 25 percent of the tax increment paid by property within the District will be spent on activities related to development or redevelopment outside of the District but within the boundaries of Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, (including administrative costs, which are considered to be spent outside of the District) subject to the limitations as described in this TIF Plan. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 2(d), the HRA and City may elect to increase by up to ten percentage points the permitted amount of expenditures for activities located outside the geographic area of the District. The HRA and City intend to pool tax increment paid by property within the District to be used to assist housing that meets the requirements contained in M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 2(d). FISCAL DISPARITIES ELECTION Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 3, the HRA or City may elect one of two methods to calculate fiscal disparities contribution of commercial- industrial net tax capacity from the District. The HRA will choose to calculate fiscal disparities by clause b (inside the District). ESTIMATED IMPACT ON OTHER TAXING JURISDICTIONS The estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions assumes that the redevelopment contemplated by the TIF Plan would occur without the creation of the District. However, the HRA and City have determined that such development or redevelopment would not reasonably be expected to occur "but for" tax increment financing and that, therefore, the fiscal impact on other taxing jurisdictions is $0. The estimated fiscal impact of the District would be as follows if the "but for" test was not met:   Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 11 Entity 2020/Pay 2021 Total Net Tax Capacity Estimated Captured Tax Capacity (CTC) upon completion Percent of CTC to Entity Total Hennepin County 2,080,642,179 840,304 0.0404% City of Edina 141,273,381 840,304 0.5948% ISD 273 (Edina)115,791,268 840,304 0.7257% Impact on Tax Base If "But/For" Not Met Entity Pay 2021 Extension Rate Percent of Total Rate CTC Potential Annual Taxes Hennepin County 38.2100%35.43% 840,304 $ 321,080 City of Edina 28.9390%26.83% 840,304 243,176 ISD 273 (Edina)31.4740%29.18% 840,304 264,477 Other 9.2350%8.56% 840,304 77,602 107.8580%100.00% $ 906,335 Impact on Tax Rates If "But/For" Not Met The estimates listed above display the estimated CTC when all construction is completed at the end of the District. The tax rate used for calculations is the Pay 2021 rate as obtained from Hennepin County. The total net capacity for the entities listed above are based on Pay 2021 figures provided by Hennepin County. The District will be certified under the Pay 2022 rates, which were unavailable at the time this TIF Plan was prepared. Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175 Subd. 2(b): (1) Estimate of total tax increment. It is estimated that the total amount of tax increment from property within the District that will be generated over the life of the District is $20,668,426;   Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 12 (2) Probable impact of the District on city provided services and ability to issue debt. An impact of the District on police protection is expected, as it is with any new development. With any addition of new residents or businesses, police calls for service will be increased. New developments add an increase in traffic and additional overall demands to the call load. However, the roadway improvements proposed as part of this redevelopment are expected to help emergency response. The City does not expect that the proposed redevelopment, in and of itself, will necessitate new capital investment in vehicles or facilities, nor an increase to staffing levels. The probable impact of the District on Fire/EMS services is not expected to be significant. A new, fully-sprinklered, non-age restricted apartment building is expected to generate few calls, if any, and be of superior construction and compliant with the latest building codes. Some of the existing buildings, which will be eliminated or relocated by the new development, are of older construction and carry issues that are expected to be improved by the new structures and/or relocation. The City does not expect that the proposed development, in and of itself, will necessitate additional staffing or new capital investment in vehicles or facilities. The impact of the District on public infrastructure is expected to be moderate. The redevelopment is not expected to significantly impact any traffic movements external to the area, but new infrastructure funded by the TIF District is proposed to enhance traffic movement throughout the District. The City may need to relocate fiber optic lines near the redevelopment and road improvements as part of the infrastructure costs. The current system infrastructure for sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water will be able to handle the additional volume generated from the proposed development. Based on the development plans, there are minimal additional costs associated with street maintenance, sweeping, plowing, lighting and sidewalks. The development in the District is expected to contribute an estimated $487,060 in met council sanitary sewer (SAC) and $878,080 in City sanitary sewer and water fees. The probable impact of any District general obligation debt issuance on the City’s ability to issue debt for general fund purposes is expected to be minimal. The City may issue general obligation tax increment revenue bonds to fund public infrastructure at some point during the District, but any such issuance is not expected to require the City’s general revenue support and would not apply to the City’s statutory debt limit.   Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 13 (3) Estimated amount of tax increment attributable to school district levies. It is estimated that the amount of tax increments over the life of the District that would be attributable to school district levies, assuming the school district's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same, is $6,031,245. The amount is calculated by multiplying the total estimated increment of $20,668,426 by the school district’s percent of the proportionate share of the total tax rate of 29.18%; (4) Estimated amount of tax increment attributable to county levies. It is estimated that the amount of tax increments over the life of the District that would be attributable to county levies, assuming the county's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same, is $7,322,040. The amount is calculated by multiplying the total estimated increment of $20,668,426 by the County’s percent of the proportionate share of the total tax rate of 35.43%; (5) Additional information requested by the county or school district. The City is not aware of any standard questions in a county or school district written policy regarding tax increment districts and impact on county or school district services. The county or school district must request additional information pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175 Subd. 2(b) within 15 days after receipt of the tax increment financing plan. At this time, no requests for additional information from the county or school district regarding the proposed development for the District have been received. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175, Subd. 1 (a), clause 7 the TIF Plan must contain identification and description of studies and analyses used to make the determination set forth in M.S. Section 469.175, Subd. 3, clause (b)(2) and the findings are required in the resolution approving the District. (i) In making said determination, reliance has been placed upon (1) written representation made by the developer to such effects, (2) review of the developer’s anticipated proforma; and (3) City staff awareness of the feasibility of developing the project site within the District, which is further outlined in the City Council resolution approving the establishment of the TIF District and Appendix C.   Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 14 (ii) A comparative analysis of estimated market value both with and without establishment of the TIF District and the use of tax increments has been performed. Such analysis is included with the cashflow in Appendix B and indicates that the increase in estimated market value of the proposed development (less the indicated subtractions) exceeds the estimated market value of the site absent the establishment of the TIF District and the use of tax increments. DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION Administration of the District will be handled by the HRA Executive Director and Economic Development Manager.   Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 15 Appendix A: Map of Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and the TIF District ¹º¹º ¹º ñ ñ ñ ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ñ ¹º ñ ñ ñTRACY AVEVERN O N A VEWOODDALE AVEHANSEN RD70TH ST W FRANCE AVE SGLEASONRDEdinaCommunityCenter CityHall SouthviewJr High NormandaleElementary ConcordSchool Cornelia School SouthdaleLibrary FireStation Public Works &Park Maintenance Creek ValleySchool FireStation Valley ViewJr High Edina HighSchool CountrysideSchool HighlandSchool PublicLibrary M innehahaCree kNineMileCree k Nine MileCreek §¨¦494 RICHFIELD MINNEAPOLIS 100 100 62 £¤169 §¨¦494 Eden / Willson Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadBLAKE RDSCHAEFER RDV E R N O N A V E CAHILL RD66TH ST W INTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 44 TH S T W 50TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST W 70TH ST W 76TH ST W DEWEY HILL RD VALLEY VIEW RD VALLEY VIEW RD 78TH ST W £¤169 62 September 2021 ±Eden / Willson TIF District Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area 0 2,100 Feet   Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 16 Appendix B: Estimated Cash Flow for the District 9/16/2021Eden / Willson Redevelopment TIF DistrictCity of Edina, MN Mixed-use RedevelopmentASSUMPTIONS AND RATESDistrictType:RedevelopmentDistrict Name/Number:Eden / WillsonCounty District #:TBDExempt Class Rate (Exempt)0.00%First Year Construction or Inflation on Value2023Commercial Industrial Preferred Class Rate (C/I Pref.)Existing District - Specify No. Years RemainingFirst $150,0001.50%Inflation Rate - Every Year:1.00%Over $150,0002.00%Interest Rate:4.00%Commercial Industrial Class Rate (C/I)2.00%Present Value Date:1-Feb-24Rental Housing Class Rate (Rental)1.25%First Period Ending1-Aug-24Affordable Rental Housing Class Rate (Aff. Rental)Tax Year District was Certified:Pay 2022First $174,000 0.75%Cashflow Assumes First Tax Increment For Development: 2025 Over $174,000 0.25%Years of Tax Increment 26 Non-Homestead Residential (Non-H Res. 1 Unit)Assumes Last Year of Tax Increment2050First $500,0001.00%Fiscal Disparities Election [Outside (A), Inside (B), or NA]Inside(B)Over $500,0001.25%Incremental or Total Fiscal DisparitiesIncrementalHomestead Residential Class Rate (Hmstd. Res.)Fiscal Disparities Contribution Ratio33.7904% Pay 2021 First $500,0001.00%Fiscal Disparities Metro-Wide Tax Rate139.5040% Pay 2021 Over $500,0001.25%Maximum/Frozen Local Tax Rate: 107.858% Pay 2021 Agricultural Non-Homestead1.00%Current Local Tax Rate: (Use lesser of Current or Max.) 107.858%Pay 2021 State-wide Tax Rate (Comm./Ind. only used for total taxes) 35.9780% Pay 2021 Market Value Tax Rate (Used for total taxes)0.21097% Pay 2021 Building Total PercentageTax Year Property CurrentClassAfterLand Market Market Of Value Used Original OriginalTaxOriginalAfterConversionMap ID PIDOwner Address Market Value ValueValue for District Market Value Market Value Class Tax Capacity Conversion Orig. Tax Cap.11802824320023Eden Ventures3,078,600 1,000 3,079,600100% 3,079,600 Pay 2022 C/I Pref.60,842 Rental38,495 121802824320029City of Edina000100%0 Pay 2022 Exempt- Rental- 23,078,600 1,000 3,079,6003,079,600 60,84238,495Note:1. Base values are for pay 2022 based upon review of County website on September 13, 2021.2. Located in SD # 273 and WS # 3.Area/ PhaseTax Rates BASE VALUE INFORMATION (Original Tax Capacity)Prepared by Ehlers 9/16/2021Eden / Willson Redevelopment TIF DistrictCity of Edina, MN Mixed-use RedevelopmentEstimated Taxable Total Taxable PropertyPercentage Percentage Percentage Percentage First YearMarket Value Market Value TotalMarketTaxProject Project Tax Completed Completed Completed Completed Full TaxesArea/Phase New Use Per Sq. Ft./Unit Per Sq. Ft./Unit Sq. Ft./UnitsValueClass Tax CapacityCapacity/Unit 2023202420252026 Payable1Apartments 274,490274,490 196 53,800,000 Rental672,5003,431 100%100%100%100%2025Retail300300 3,337 1,001,100 C/I Pref. 19,2726 100%100%100%100%2025TOTAL54,801,100 691,772 Subtotal Residential196 53,800,000 672,500 Subtotal Commercial/Ind.3,337 1,001,100 19,272 Note:1. Market values are based upon preliminary estimates from the Assessor's Office.Total Fiscal Local Local Fiscal State-wide MarketTax Disparities Tax PropertyDisparities PropertyValueTotal Taxes PerNew Use CapacityTax CapacityCapacityTaxesTaxesTaxesTaxesTaxes Sq. Ft./UnitApartments 672,5000672,500 725,34500113,502 838,847 4,279.83Retail 19,2726,51212,760 13,7639,0856,3942,11231,3539.40TOTAL 691,772 6,512 685,260 739,108 9,0856,394115,614 870,200Note: 1. Taxes and tax increment will vary significantly from year to year depending upon values, rates, state law, fiscal disparities and other factors which cannot be predicted.Total Property Taxes 870,200Current Market Value - Est. 3,079,600less State-wide Taxes (6,394)New Market Value - Est. 54,801,100less Fiscal Disp. Adj. (9,085) Difference 51,721,500less Market Value Taxes (115,614)Present Value of Tax Increment 12,043,964less Base Value Taxes (41,520) Difference 39,677,536Annual Gross TIF 697,588Value likely to occur without Tax Increment is less than:39,677,536 WHAT IS EXCLUDED FROM TIF?MARKET VALUE BUT / FOR ANALYSISTAX CALCULATIONSPROJECT INFORMATION (Project Tax Capacity)Prepared by Ehlers 9/16/2021Tax Increment Cashflow - Page 3Eden / Willson Redevelopment TIF DistrictCity of Edina, MN Mixed-use RedevelopmentTAX INCREMENT CASH FLOWProject Original Fiscal CapturedLocal Annual Semi-Annual State Admin.Semi-Annual Semi-Annual PERIOD% of TaxTax Disparities TaxTax Gross Tax Gross Tax AuditoratNet Tax Present ENDING Tax PaymentOTC Capacity Capacity Incremental CapacityRate Increment Increment 0.36%10% Increment Value Yrs. Year Date- - - - 08/01/24- - - - 02/01/25100% 691,772 (38,495) (6,512) 646,765 107.858% 697,588 348,794 (1,256) (34,754) 312,784 294,744 0.5 2025 08/01/25100% 691,772 (38,495) (6,512) 646,765 107.858% 697,588 348,794 (1,256) (34,754) 312,784 583,708 1 2025 02/01/26100% 698,690 (38,495) (6,577) 653,618 107.858% 704,979 352,489 (1,269) (35,122) 316,098 870,008 1.5 2026 08/01/26100% 698,690 (38,495) (6,577) 653,618 107.858% 704,979 352,489 (1,269) (35,122) 316,098 1,150,694 2 2026 02/01/27100% 705,677 (38,495) (6,643) 660,539 107.858% 712,444 356,222 (1,282) (35,494) 319,446 1,428,791 2.5 2027 08/01/27100% 705,677 (38,495) (6,643) 660,539 107.858% 712,444 356,222 (1,282) (35,494) 319,446 1,701,435 3 2027 02/01/28100% 712,733 (38,495) (6,709) 667,529 107.858% 719,983 359,992 (1,296) (35,870) 322,826 1,971,561 3.5 2028 08/01/28100% 712,733 (38,495) (6,709) 667,529 107.858% 719,983 359,992 (1,296) (35,870) 322,826 2,236,391 4 2028 02/01/29100% 719,861 (38,495) (6,777) 674,589 107.858% 727,598 363,799 (1,310) (36,249) 326,241 2,498,774 4.5 2029 08/01/29100% 719,861 (38,495) (6,777) 674,589 107.858%727,598 363,799 (1,310) (36,249) 326,241 2,756,013 5 2029 02/01/30100% 727,059 (38,495) (6,844) 681,720 107.858% 735,290 367,645 (1,324) (36,632) 329,689 3,010,873 5.5 2030 08/01/30100% 727,059 (38,495) (6,844) 681,720 107.858% 735,290 367,645 (1,324) (36,632) 329,689 3,260,736 6 2030 02/01/31100% 734,330 (38,495) (6,913) 688,922 107.858% 743,058 371,529 (1,338) (37,019) 333,172 3,508,288 6.5 2031 08/01/31100% 734,330 (38,495) (6,913) 688,922 107.858% 743,058 371,529 (1,338) (37,019) 333,172 3,750,986 7 2031 02/01/32100% 741,673 (38,495) (6,982) 696,196 107.858%750,903 375,452 (1,352) (37,410) 336,690 3,991,438 7.5 2032 08/01/32100% 741,673 (38,495) (6,982) 696,196 107.858% 750,903 375,452 (1,352) (37,410) 336,690 4,227,174 8 2032 02/01/33100% 749,090 (38,495) (7,052) 703,543 107.858% 758,828 379,414 (1,366) (37,805) 340,243 4,460,728 8.5 2033 08/01/33100% 749,090 (38,495) (7,052) 703,543 107.858% 758,828 379,414 (1,366) (37,805) 340,243 4,689,702 9 2033 02/01/34100% 756,581 (38,495) (7,122) 710,964 107.858% 766,831 383,416 (1,380) (38,204) 343,832 4,916,554 9.5 2034 08/01/34100% 756,581 (38,495) (7,122) 710,964 107.858% 766,831 383,416 (1,380) (38,204) 343,832 5,138,957 10 2034 02/01/35100% 764,147 (38,495) (7,193) 718,458 107.858% 774,915 387,457 (1,395) (38,606) 347,456 5,359,299 10.5 2035 08/01/35100% 764,147 (38,495) (7,193) 718,458 107.858% 774,915 387,457 (1,395) (38,606) 347,456 5,575,320 11 2035 02/01/36100% 771,788 (38,495) (7,265) 726,028 107.858% 783,079 391,540 (1,410) (39,013) 351,117 5,789,337 11.5 2036 08/01/36100% 771,788 (38,495) (7,265) 726,028 107.858% 783,079 391,540 (1,410) (39,013) 351,117 5,999,157 12 2036 02/01/37100% 779,506 (38,495) (7,338) 733,673 107.858% 791,325 395,663 (1,424) (39,424) 354,814 6,207,029 12.5 2037 08/01/37100% 779,506 (38,495) (7,338) 733,673 107.858% 791,325 395,663 (1,424) (39,424) 354,814 6,410,825 13 2037 02/01/38100% 787,301 (38,495) (7,411) 741,395 107.858% 799,653 399,827 (1,439) (39,839) 358,549 6,612,728 13.5 2038 08/01/38100% 787,301 (38,495) (7,411) 741,395 107.858% 799,653 399,827 (1,439) (39,839) 358,549 6,810,673 14 2038 02/01/39100% 795,174 (38,495) (7,485) 749,194 107.858% 808,065 404,033 (1,455) (40,258) 362,320 7,006,777 14.5 2039 08/01/39100% 795,174 (38,495) (7,485) 749,194 107.858% 808,065 404,033 (1,455) (40,258) 362,320 7,199,036 15 2039 02/01/40100% 803,126 (38,495) (7,560) 757,070 107.858% 816,561 408,281 (1,470) (40,681) 366,130 7,389,508 15.5 2040 08/01/40100% 803,126 (38,495) (7,560) 757,070 107.858% 816,561 408,281 (1,470) (40,681) 366,130 7,576,244 16 2040 02/01/41100% 811,157 (38,495) (7,636) 765,026 107.858% 825,142 412,571 (1,485) (41,109) 369,977 7,761,243 16.5 2041 08/01/41100% 811,157 (38,495) (7,636) 765,026 107.858% 825,142 412,571 (1,485) (41,109) 369,977 7,942,614 17 2041 02/01/42100% 819,269 (38,495) (7,712) 773,061 107.858% 833,809 416,904 (1,501) (41,540) 373,863 8,122,297 17.5 2042 08/01/42100% 819,269 (38,495) (7,712) 773,061 107.858% 833,809 416,904 (1,501) (41,540) 373,863 8,298,456 18 2042 02/01/43100% 827,461 (38,495) (7,789) 781,177 107.858% 842,562 421,281 (1,517) (41,976) 377,788 8,472,975 18.5 2043 08/01/43100% 827,461 (38,495) (7,789) 781,177 107.858% 842,562 421,281 (1,517) (41,976) 377,788 8,644,071 19 2043 02/01/44100% 835,736 (38,495) (7,867) 789,374 107.858% 851,403 425,701 (1,533) (42,417) 381,752 8,813,573 19.5 2044 08/01/44100% 835,736 (38,495) (7,867) 789,374 107.858% 851,403 425,701 (1,533) (42,417) 381,752 8,979,751 20 2044 02/01/45100% 844,093 (38,495) (7,946) 797,652 107.858% 860,332 430,166 (1,549) (42,862) 385,756 9,144,380 20.5 2045 08/01/45100% 844,093 (38,495) (7,946) 797,652 107.858% 860,332 430,166 (1,549) (42,862) 385,756 9,305,780 21 2045 02/01/46100% 852,534 (38,495) (8,025) 806,014 107.858% 869,350 434,675 (1,565) (43,311) 389,799 9,465,674 21.5 2046 08/01/46100% 852,534 (38,495) (8,025) 806,014 107.858% 869,350 434,675 (1,565) (43,311) 389,799 9,622,434 22 2046 02/01/47100% 861,060 (38,495) (8,106) 814,459 107.858% 878,459 439,230 (1,581) (43,765) 393,883 9,777,729 22.5 2047 08/01/47100% 861,060 (38,495) (8,106) 814,459 107.858% 878,459 439,230 (1,581) (43,765) 393,883 9,929,980 23 2047 02/01/48100% 869,670 (38,495) (8,187) 822,988 107.858% 887,659 443,829 (1,598) (44,223) 398,008 10,080,809 23.5 2048 08/01/48100% 869,670 (38,495) (8,187) 822,988 107.858% 887,659 443,829 (1,598) (44,223) 398,008 10,228,680 24 2048 02/01/49100% 878,367 (38,495) (8,269) 831,603 107.858% 896,951 448,475 (1,615) (44,686) 402,175 10,375,169 24.5 2049 08/01/49100% 878,367 (38,495) (8,269) 831,603 107.858% 896,951 448,475 (1,615) (44,686) 402,175 10,518,786 25 2049 02/01/50100% 887,151 (38,495) (8,351) 840,304 107.858% 906,335 453,168 (1,631) (45,154) 406,383 10,661,061 25.5 2050 08/01/50100% 887,151 (38,495) (8,351) 840,304 107.858% 906,335 453,168 (1,631) (45,154) 406,383 10,800,545 26 2050 02/01/51 Total20,743,101 (74,675) (2,066,843) 18,601,584 Present Value From 02/01/2024 Present Value Rate 4.00%12,043,964 (43,358) (1,200,061) 10,800,545 Prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc. - Estimates OnlyN:\Minnsota\EDINA\Housing Economic Redevelopment\TIF\TIF Districts\Eden Willson Ave Redevelopment\Cash flow\Preliminary TIF Cashflow (9.13.2021).xls   Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 17 Appendix C: Findings Including But/For Qualifications The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan (TIF Plan) for Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District (the “District”), as required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 are as follows: 1. Finding that Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District is a redevelopment district as defined in M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 10. The District consists of two (2) parcels within the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and their internal and external rights-of-way, abutting roadways and intersections, pedestrian pathways and crossings, all with plans to redevelop the area for redevelopment and construction of a mixed use apartment and retail building. Parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area of the District are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures and more than 50 percent of the buildings in the District, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance. (See Appendix D of the TIF Plan.) 2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District permitted by the TIF Plan. The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future: This finding is supported by the fact that the activities proposed in the TIF Plan meets the City's objectives for redevelopment. The existing property contains substandard buildings whose renovation requires high costs related to demolition, remediation and reconstruction of infrastructure. The redevelopment also requires substantial investment toward public improvements such as local transportation and utility infrastructure and shared public parking. The combination of limited amounts of property available for expansion adjacent to the existing redevelopment site, height/density limitations, and the public and private cost of financing the proposed improvements which   Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 18 are essential to the comprehensive redevelopment of the area, this project is feasible only through assistance, in part, from tax increment financing. The developer provided a proforma outlining project sources and uses as well as projected rent, vacancy and financing assumptions. City staff and the City’s financial advisor reviewed the information and have determined that the project is not feasible without assistance due to anticipated rent levels and market returns not supporting the redevelopment costs for this site. The term of assistance for the redevelopment project is expected to be less than the maximum 26-year term of a redevelopment district. The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the TIF Plan: This finding is justified on the grounds that the development intensity and tax base created on currently underutilized and declining property requires site and public improvement costs that are improbable without public assistance. Specifically, the cost of site preparation, demolition, remediation, and public improvements to include transportation and utility infrastructure will add significantly to the total redevelopment cost of any development in this area. Site and public improvements costs necessary to sustain the approved density have made redevelopment infeasible without tax increment assistance. The City reasonably determines that no other redevelopment of similar scope is anticipated on this site without substantially similar assistance being provided to the development. Therefore, the City concludes as follows: a. The City's estimate of the amount by which the market value of the entire District will increase without the use of tax increment financing is $0. b. If the proposed development occurs, the total estimated increase in taxable market value will be $51,721,500. c. The present value of tax increments from the District for the maximum duration of the district permitted by the TIF Plan is estimated to be $12,043,964.   Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 19 d. Even if some development other than the proposed development were to occur, the Council finds that no alternative would occur that would produce a taxable market value increase greater than $39,677,536 (the amount in clause b less the amount in clause c) without tax increment assistance. 3. Finding that the TIF Plan for the District conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole. The City of Edina Planning Commission reviewed the TIF Plan on 10/13/2021 and approved Resolution PC-B-21-31 to provide written opinion affirming that the TIF Plan conforms to the general development plan of the City. 4. Finding that the TIF Plan for Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area by private enterprise. Through the implementation of the TIF Plan, the City will provide an impetus for the construction of a new mixed-use private development which will result in increased employment in the City and the State of Minnesota, the renovation of substandard properties, increased tax base of the State and add a high-quality development to the City.   Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 20 Appendix D: Redevelopment Qualifications for the District Report of Inspection Procedures and Results For Determining Qualifications of a Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District as a Redevelopment or Renewal/Renovation District Edina HRA Potential TIF District Eden/Willson Avenue Edina, Minnesota Stantec Project No. 193805291 October 4, 2021 Page 2 Table of Contents PART 1 Executive Summary 3 Purpose of Evaluation 3 Scope of Work 3 Conclusion 4 PART 2 Minnesota Statute 469.174, Subdivision 10 Requirements 4 PART 3 Procedures Followed 6 PART 4 Findings 6 A. Coverage Test 7 B. Condition of Building Test 8 1. Replacement Cost 8 2. Code Deficiencies 8 3. System Condition Deficiencies 9 C. Distribution of Substandard Structures 10 D. Conclusion 10 PART 5 Team Credentials 11 APPENDIX A Map of Potential TIF District APPENDIX B Full Building Estimated Replacement Costs APPENDIX C Building Code and Condition Deficiencies Reports APPENDIX D Code Deficiency Estimated Replacement Costs APPENDIX E Photographs Page 3 PART 1 – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PURPOSE OF EVALUATION Stantec was retained by City of Edina HRA to evaluate the properties within a Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment District (“TIF District”) to be established by the City of Edina. The potential TIF District is located in the City of Edina and includes two parcels (PID: 1802824320023 and PID: 1802824320029). The parcels are bounded by Vernon Avenue South on the north, Willson Road on the east, Eden Avenue on the south, and Highway 100 on the west. (See Figure 1). The purpose of Stantec’s work was to determine whether the potential district meets the statutory requirements for coverage, and whether buildings on these parcels, located within the potential TIF District, meets the qualifications required for a Redevelopment or Renewal/Renovation District. Figure 1 – Potential TIF District Page 4 SCOPE OF WORK The potential TIF District Area is comprised of one parcel containing one (1) commercial building currently owned by Eden Ventures LLC and one parcel containing two (2) historic buildings currently listed on the National Register of Historic Places and owned by the City of Edina. The three buildings in the potential district received an onsite interior and exterior inspection. Building Code and Condition Deficiency Reports for the buildings inspected by Stantec are in Appendix B. CONCLUSION After inspecting and evaluating the property within the potential TIF District and applying current statutory criteria for a Redevelopment or Renewal/Renovation District under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, it is our professional opinion that the potential TIF District does qualify as a Redevelopment or Renewal/Renovation District. The remainder of this report describes the process and findings in detail. PART 2 – MINNESOTA STATUTE 469.174, SUBDIVISION 10 REQUIREMENTS The properties were inspected in accordance with the following requirements under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, which states: Interior Inspection "The municipality may not make such determination [that the building is structurally substandard] without an interior inspection of the property..." Exterior Inspection and Other Means "An interior inspection of the property is not required, if the municipality finds that (1) the municipality or authority is unable to gain access to the property after using its best efforts to obtain permission from the party that owns or controls the property; and (2) the evidence otherwise supports a reasonable conclusion that the building is structurally substandard." Documentation "Written documentation of the findings and reasons why an interior inspection was not conducted must be made and retained under section 469.175, subdivision 3(1)." Qualification Requirements Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(a)requires two tests for occupied parcels: Page 5 1. Coverage Test ”…parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area of the district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures.” The coverage required by the parcel to be considered occupied is defined under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(e), which states: " For purposes of this subdivision, a parcel is not occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures unless 15 percent of the area of the parcel contains buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures.” 2. Condition of Building Test …”and more than 50 percent of the buildings, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance;” 1. Structurally substandard is defined under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(b), which states: “For purposes of this subdivision, "structurally substandard" shall mean containing defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance.” 2. Buildings are not eligible to be considered structurally substandard unless they meet certain additional criteria, as set forth in Subdivision 10(c) which states: "A building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance with the building code applicable to new buildings or could be modified to satisfy the building code at a cost of less than 15 percent of the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and type on the site. The municipality may find that a building is not disqualified as structurally substandard under the preceding sentence on the basis of reasonably available evidence, such as the size, type, and age of the building, the average cost of plumbing, electrical, or structural repairs, or other similar reliable evidence." "Items of evidence that support such a conclusion include recent fire or police inspections, on-site property tax appraisals or housing inspections, exterior evidence of deterioration, or other similar reliable evidence." Page 6 PART 3 – PROCEDURES FOLLOWED Stantec performed interior and exterior inspections of the commercial building located at 4917 Eden Avenue within the Potential TIF District on April 6, 2021 and the two buildings located at 4918 Eden Avenue within the Potential TIF District on August 25, 2021. Visual observations were made of all levels of the commercial buildings, with physical measurements taken where necessary. Construction data is based upon information from various sources, as noted. PART 4 – FINDINGS A. Coverage Test 1. The total square foot area of the parcels was obtained from Hennepin County Property Map GIS mapping and site verification. 2. The total square foot area of building and site improvements on the parcels in the potential TIF District Area were obtained from Hennepin County Property Map GIS mapping, Owner-provided documentation, and site verification. 3. The percentage of coverage for the parcels in the Potential TIF District Area was computed to determine if the parcel meets the 15 percent minimum requirement. Findings: The Potential TIF District Area parcels meet the coverage test under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(e). The following areas are per the Hennepin County GIS Interactive Maps: Page 7 Area of Parcel PID 1802824320023: 2.08 acres or 90,546 square feet Area of Building Footprint: 9,757 square feet per floor (197’-9 3/8” x 49’-4”) PID 1802824320029: 0.58 acres or 25,208 square feet Area of Building Footprints: Historic Cahill School: 1,074 square feet Minnehaha Grange Hall: 1,414 square feet Figure 2 – Coverage Test Aerial View POTENTIAL TIF DISTRICT Parcel ID Parcel Area Coverage Area Coverage Percentage 1802824320023 90,546 SF 72,357 SF 79.9% 1802824320029 25,208 SF 7,059 SF 28.1% Page 8 B. Condition of Building Test 1. Replacement Cost The first step in evaluating a building to determine if it is substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance is to determine its replacement cost. This is the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and type on site. Replacement costs were researched using R.S. Means Cost Works square foot models for 2021. A replacement cost was calculated by first establishing building use (office, retail, restaurant, etc.), building construction type (wood, concrete, masonry, etc.), and building size to obtain the appropriate median replacement cost, which factors in the costs of construction in Edina, Minnesota. Replacement cost includes labor, materials, and the contractor's overhead and profit. Replacement costs do not include architectural design fees, legal fees or other “soft" costs not directly related to construction activities. Replacement cost for each building is tabulated in Appendix C. 2. Code Deficiencies The next step in evaluating a building is to determine what code deficiencies exist with respect to such building. Code deficiencies are those conditions for a building which are not in compliance with current building codes applicable to new buildings in the State of Minnesota. Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c), specifically provides that a building cannot be considered structurally substandard if its code deficiencies are not at least 15 percent of the replacement cost of the building. Thus, it was necessary to determine the extent of code deficiencies for the building in the potential TIF District. The evaluation was made by reviewing all available information with respect to such buildings contained in City Building Inspection records and making interior and exterior inspections of the building. Stantec utilized the 2020 Minnesota State Building Code as the official code for their evaluations. The Minnesota State Building Code is a series of provisional codes written specifically for Minnesota only requirements, adoption of several international codes, and amendments to the adopted international codes. After identifying the code deficiencies in each building, we used R.S. Means Cost Works 2021; Unit and Assembly Costs to determine the cost of correcting the identified deficiencies. We were then able to compare the correction costs with the replacement cost of the building to determine if the costs for correcting code deficiencies meet the required 15 percent threshold. Page 9 Finding: The buildings in the Potential TIF District Area contains code deficiencies exceeding the 15 percent threshold required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c). A complete Building Code and Condition Deficiency report for each building in the Potential TIF District can be found in Appendix B of this report. 3. System Condition Deficiencies System condition deficiencies are a measurement of defects or substantial deterioration in site elements, structure, exterior envelope, mechanical and electrical components, fire protection and emergency systems, interior partitions, ceilings, floors, and doors. The evaluation was made by reviewing all available information contained in City records, as well performing interior and exterior inspections of the buildings. Stantec only identified system condition deficiencies that were visible during our inspection of the building. We did not consider the amount of "service life" used up for a particular component unless it was an obvious part of that component's deficiencies. Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c), provides for the minimum threshold of code deficiencies that must be met in order to consider a building substandard. If a building meets the minimum code deficiency threshold under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c), then in order for such building to be "structurally substandard" under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(b), the building's defects or deficiencies should be of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance." Based on this definition, Stantec re-evaluated each of the buildings that met the code deficiency threshold under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c), to determine if the total deficiencies warranted "substantial renovation or clearance" based on the criteria outlined above. Finding: In our professional opinion, the buildings in the Potential TIF District Area are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance, because of defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance as described in Appendix B. The two buildings on PID 1802824320029 are the Historic Cahill School and Minnehaha Grange Hall. Both buildings are on the National Register of Historic Places. It is our understanding these two buildings will be relocated to a more suitable site due to their historic nature and importance to the City of Edina. Page 10 C. Distribution of Substandard Structures Much of this report has focused on the condition of the building as it relates to requirements identified by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10. It is also important to look at the distribution of the substandard buildings within the geographic area of the Potential TIF District Area. Finding: The substandard buildings are reasonably distributed throughout the geographic area of the Potential TIF District Area (Figure 3). Figure 3 – Distribution of Substandard Structures D. CONCLUSION After inspecting and evaluating the properties within the Potential TIF District and applying current statutory criteria for a Redevelopment or Renewal/Renovation District under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10a, it is our professional opinion that the Potential TIF District does qualify as a Redevelopment or Renewal/Renovation District. The remainder of this report describes our process and findings in detail. Page 11 PART 5 – TEAM CREDENTIALS Stantec Architecture Inc. Bruce P. Paulson – Senior Project Manager/Architect MN Registration #20910 Bruce has more than 45 years of architectural experience as project architect, project manager, and project designer for municipal, governmental, educational, commercial, hospitality, and healthcare clients. He is involved with all phases of the architectural process, from pre-design through construction administration, including specialty consulting in investigations for buildings, building condition surveys, TIF inspections, code reviews, estimating, and specification writing. APPENDIX A Potential Eden/Willson Avenue TIF District Boundary Hennepin County Property Map Date: 5/7/2021 Comments: 1 inch = 100 feet PARCEL ID: 1802824320023 OWNER NAME: Eden Ventures Llc PARCEL ADDRESS: 4917 Eden Ave, Edina MN 55436 PARCEL AREA: 2.08 acres, 90,546 sq ft A-T-B: Torrens SALE PRICE: $4,200,000 SALE DATA: 11/2007 SALE CODE: Excluded From Ratio Studies ASSESSED 2020, PAYABLE 2021 PROPERTY TYPE: Commercial-Preferred HOMESTEAD: Non-Homestead MARKET VALUE: $3,079,600 TAX TOTAL: $99,960.32 ASSESSED 2021, PAYABLE 2022 PROPERTY TYPE: Commercial HOMESTEAD: Non-homestead MARKET VALUE: $3,079,600 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2021 Hennepin County Property Map Date: 8/25/2021 Comments: 1 inch = 200 feet PARCEL ID: 1802824320029 OWNER NAME: City Of Edina PARCEL ADDRESS: 4801 50th St W, Edina MN 55424 PARCEL AREA: 4.51 acres, 196,668 sq ft A-T-B: Both SALE PRICE: SALE DATA: SALE CODE: ASSESSED 2020, PAYABLE 2021 PROPERTY TYPE: Residential HOMESTEAD: Non-Homestead MARKET VALUE: $0 TAX TOTAL: $0.00 ASSESSED 2021, PAYABLE 2022 PROPERTY TYPE: Residential HOMESTEAD: Non-homestead MARKET VALUE: $0 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2021 APPENDIX B 1 EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT FULL BUILDING REPLACEMENT ESTIMATED COSTS May 30, 2021 The first step in evaluating a building to determine if it is substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance is to determine its replacement cost. This is the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and type on site. Replacement costs were researched using R.S. Means Cost Works square foot models for 2021. A replacement cost was calculated by first establishing building use (office, restaurant, etc.), building construction type (wood, concrete, masonry, etc.), and building size to obtain the appropriate median replacement cost, which factors in the costs of construction in Edina, Minnesota. Replacement cost includes labor, materials, and the contractor's overhead and profit. Replacement costs do not include architectural design fees, legal fees, or other “soft" costs not directly related to construction activities. Property ID No. & Property Address: 1802824320023 4917 Eden Avenue General Description of Property: 2-story Commercial Restaurant/Office Building Type of Construction: Concrete block bearing walls at lower level with brick and stone veneer; concrete block and wood stud exterior walls at upper level with brick wainscot, stone accents, and wood siding; built-up roofing system over roof sheathing on wood roof joists Date of Construction: 1973 Story Height: 15’-0” lower level; 12’-0” upper level Building Perimeter: 494’-3” Structure Size: 19,514 GSF Total Estimated Replacement Cost: Restaurant, 4,972 SF $1,176,427.23 Office, 14,542 SF $2,232,722.99 Total Estimated Replacement Cost: $3,409,150.22 Property ID No. & Property Address: 1802824320029 4918 Eden Avenue Inspection Date(s) and Time(s): 8-25-2021, 7:45 a.m. Inspection Type: Interior and exterior. General Description of Property: Historic Cahill School; Single story schoolhouse with full basement Type of Construction: Concrete block foundation walls with stone veneer above grade; wood stud exterior walls at main level with painted wood lap siding; cedar shingles on wood roof joists Date of Construction: 1864 Story Height: 9’-0” lower level; 11’-6” upper level Building Perimeter: 134’-0” Structure Size(s): 2,147 GSF Total Estimated Replacement Cost: $420,623.67 2 Property ID No. & Property Address: 1802824320029 4918 Eden Avenue Inspection Date(s) and Time(s): 8-25-2021, 8:30 a.m. Inspection Type: Interior and exterior. General Description of Property: Grange Hall; Single story grange hall with balcony and full basement Type of Construction: Concrete block foundation walls; wood stud exterior walls at main level with painted wood lap siding; cedar shingles on wood roof joists Date of Construction: 1879 Story Height: 8’-0” lower level; 13’-10” main level; 10’-0” balcony Building Perimeter: 161’-4” Structure Size(s): 3,158 GSF Total Estimated Replacement Cost: $574,060.81 APPENDIX C EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT BUILDING CONDITION AND CODE DEFICIENCIES REPORT August 30, 2021 Property ID No. & Property Address: 1802824320023 4917 Eden Avenue Inspection Date(s) and Time(s): 4-6-2021, 1:00 p.m. Inspection Type: Interior and exterior. General Description of Property: 2-story Commercial Restaurant/Office Building Type of Construction: Concrete block bearing walls at lower level with brick and stone veneer; concrete block and wood stud exterior walls at upper level with brick wainscot, stone accents, and wood siding; built-up roofing system over roof sheathing on wood roof joists Date of Construction: 1973 Story Height: 15’-0” lower level; 12’-0” upper level Building Perimeter: 494’-3” Structure Size(s): 19,514 GSF Total Summary of Deficiencies: It is our professional opinion that this building is Substandard because: o Estimated cost to correct building code deficiencies is more than 15% of the estimated replacement cost. Estimated Replacement Cost: $3,409,150.22 Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: $1,147,368.25 Percentage of Replacement Cost for Building Code Deficiencies: 33.6% Description of Condition Deficiencies • Lower level: restrooms do not comply with current ADA requirements. • Lower level: Entry vestibule depth does not comply with current ADA requirements. • Both stairs do not comply with current requirements for tread depth and riser height. Handrails and guardrails do not comply with current code requirements. • Upper level office entry vestibule: depth does not comply with current ADA requirements. • Upper level: restrooms do not comply with current ADA requirements. • Restaurant: No smoke detectors. • Restaurant: Emergency exit is via exterior catwalk at south wall. Stair at east end of catwalk does not comply with current code requirements for minimum tread depth and maximum riser height. • Interior: Lighting systems do not comply with current energy code. • Interior: Current HVAC systems do not meet current indoor air quality requirements. • Interior: Current fire alarm system does not have strobes. • Exterior: Wall systems do not comply with current code requirements for R-value. • Roof access is via vertical ladder which does not comply with current codes for roof top equipment requiring regular replacement of filters. Current code requires a ships ladder with maximum 60 degree slope. • Built-up roofing systems do not comply with current code requirements for R-value. EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT BUILDING CONDITION AND CODE DEFICIENCIES REPORT August 30, 2021 Property ID No. & Property Address: 1802824320029 4918 Eden Avenue Inspection Date(s) and Time(s): 8-25-2021, 7:45 a.m. Inspection Type: Interior and exterior. General Description of Property: Historic Cahill School; Single story schoolhouse with full basement Type of Construction: Concrete block foundation walls with stone veneer above grade; wood stud exterior walls at main level with painted wood lap siding; cedar shingles on wood roof joists Date of Construction: 1864 Story Height: 9’-0” lower level; 11’-6” upper level Building Perimeter: 134’-0” Structure Size(s): 2,147 GSF Total Summary of Deficiencies: It is our professional opinion that this building is Substandard because: o Estimated cost to correct building code deficiencies is more than 15% of the estimated replacement cost. Estimated Replacement Cost: $420,623.67 Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: $185,183.00 Percentage of Replacement Cost for Building Code Deficiencies: 44% Description of Condition Deficiencies • Lower level: restrooms do not comply with current ADA requirements. • Lower level: No accessible route. • Lower level: Windows are single pane. • Stair to lower level does not comply with current requirements for tread depth and riser height. Handrails and guardrails do not comply with current code requirements. • Main level: Accessible from east side by ramp, but the doors do not comply with current ADA requirements for clear width. Both doors are 34” wide. Door thresholds are not ADA compliant. • Main level: No restrooms. • Main level: Windows are single pane. • Interior: Lighting systems do not comply with current energy code. • Interior: Current HVAC systems do not meet current indoor air quality requirements. • Exterior: Wall systems do not comply with current code requirements for R-value. • Attic: No insulation. Does not comply with current code requirements for R-value. EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT BUILDING CONDITION AND CODE DEFICIENCIES REPORT August 30, 2021 Property ID No. & Property Address: 1802824320029 4918 Eden Avenue Inspection Date(s) and Time(s): 8-25-2021, 8:30 a.m. Inspection Type: Interior and exterior. General Description of Property: Grange Hall; Single story grange hall with balcony and full basement Type of Construction: Concrete block foundation walls; wood stud exterior walls at main level with painted wood lap siding; cedar shingles on wood roof joists Date of Construction: 1879 Story Height: 8’-0” lower level; 13’-10” main level; 10’-0” balcony Building Perimeter: 161’-4” Structure Size(s): 3,158 GSF Total Summary of Deficiencies: It is our professional opinion that this building is Substandard because: o Estimated cost to correct building code deficiencies is more than 15% of the estimated replacement cost. Estimated Replacement Cost: $574,060.81 Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: $257,701.00 Percentage of Replacement Cost for Building Code Deficiencies: 44.9% Description of Condition Deficiencies • Lower level: restrooms do not comply with current ADA requirements. • Lower level: No accessible route. • Lower level: Windows are single pane. • Stairs to lower level and balcony do not comply with current requirements for tread depth and riser height. Handrails and guardrails do not comply with current code requirements. • Main level: No restrooms. • Main level: Windows are single pane. • Balcony: Windows are single pane. • Interior: Lighting systems do not comply with current energy code. • Interior: Current HVAC systems do not meet current indoor air quality requirements. • Interior: No fire alarm system. No fire sprinkler system. • Exterior: Wall systems do not comply with current code requirements for R-value. • Attic: No insulation. Does not comply with current code requirements for R-value. APPENDIX D EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT CODE DEFICIENCY ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT COSTS $98,900.00 Mens Restroom: 1 water closet, 1 urinal, 1 lavatory Womens Restroom: 1 water closets, 1 lavatory $125,350.00 Mens Restrooms (2): 2 water closets, 2 lavatories Womens Restrooms (2): 2 water closets, 2 lavatories Office Restroom: 1 water closet, 1 lavatory, 1 shower Lower level entry upgrade - demolition and new construction Increase depth of entry vestibule to comply with ADA requirements 5'-0" x 8'-0" = 40 SF x $150/SF $6,000.00 $72,800.00 Upper level Office entry upgrade - demolition and new construction Increase depth of entry vestibule to comply with ADA requirements 5'-0" x 8'-0" = 40 SF x $150/SF $6,000.00 $7,500.00 Upgrade lighting systems to meet current codes $243,925.00 Upgrade HVAC system to meet current codes Replace rooftop air handling units with new units - 19,514 SF x $11.75/SF $229,289.50 Upgrade fire alarm system to add strobes to meet current codes Add strobes to existing fire alarm system - 19,514 SF x $1.50/SF $29,271.00 Upgrade exterior walls to meet current R-value code requirements $77,090.00 Replace existing built-up roofing system Remove existing roofing – 9,757 SF x $7.25/SF $70,738.25 $180,504.50 Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies:$1,147,368.25 Property ID No. & Property Address: 1802824320023 4917 Eden Avenue Install smoke detectors – 3,750 SF x $2.00/SF Upper level – 218 SF x $575/SF Add smoke detectors in restaurant Install new 4-ply built-up roofing system w/ 5” polyisocyanurate roof insulation, thermal barrier and vapor barrier 9,757 x $18.50/SF Replace light fixtures; provide daylighting and occupancy sensors for lighting control – 19,514 SF x $12.50/SF Install R-15 insulation, 3-5/8" metal studs @ 24" on center, 5/8" gypsum board taped, sanded and painted - 11,860 SF x $6.50/SF Lower level – 172 SF x $575/SF Restroom upgrade – demolition and new construction Upgrade stairs from lower level to upper level (includes removal) Metal pan stairs for concrete in-fill, picket rail, 26 risers, w/ landing 2 flights of stair - $36,400/flight x 2 1 of 3 EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT CODE DEFICIENCY ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT COSTS HISTORIC CAHILL SCHOOL $68,000.00 Mens Restroom: 1 water closet, 1 lavatory Womens Restroom: 1 water closet, 1 lavatory Upgrade lower level windows to insulating panes (3 windows @ 5 SF each)$1,500.00 $25,200.00 Replace two (2) 34" wide wood doors in east wall with 36" wide wood doors $3,600.00 Upgrade main level windows to insulating panes (6 windows @ 15 SF each)$4,500.00 Upgrade lighting systems to meet current codes $26,838.00 Upgrade HVAC system to meet current codes Replace gas fired forced air furnace with new - 2,147 SF x $11.75/SF $25,228.00 New fire alarm system to meet current codes New fire alarm system - 2,147 SF x $4.50/SF $9,662.00 Upgrade exterior walls to meet current R-value code requirements $10,452.00 Uprgade attic space to meet current R-value code requirements Install R-49 insulation in attic space - 1,074 SF x $9.75/SF $10,203.00 Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies:$185,183.00 Property ID No. & Property Address: 1802824320029 4918 Eden Avenue Restroom upgrade – demolition and new construction Lower level – 120 SF x $575/SF Upgrade stairs from lower level to main level (includes removal) Install R-15 insulation in existing stud wall - 1,608 SF x $6.50/SF Metal pan stairs for concrete in-fill, picket rail, 18 risers, w/ landings Replace light fixtures; provide daylighting and occupancy sensors for lighting control – 2,147 SF x $12.50/SF 2 of 3 EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT CODE DEFICIENCY ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT COSTS HISTORIC GRANGE HALL $68,000.00 Mens Restroom: 1 water closet, 1 lavatory Womens Restroom: 1 water closet, 1 lavatory $22,400.00 $18,200.00 Upgrade main level windows to insulating panes (7 windows @ 24 SF each)$21,000.00 Upgrade balcony level windows to insulating panes (4 windows @ 17 SF each)$9,000.00 Upgrade lighting systems to meet current codes $39,475.00 Upgrade HVAC system to meet current codes Replace gas fired forced air furnace with new - 3,158 SF x $11.75/SF $37,107.00 New fire alarm system to meet current codes New fire alarm system - 3,158 SF x $4.50/SF $14,211.00 Upgrade exterior walls to meet current R-value code requirements $15,730.00 Uprgade attic space to meet current R-value code requirements Install R-49 insulation in attic space - 1,324 SF x $9.75/SF $12,578.00 Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies:$257,701.00 Property ID No. & Property Address: 1802824320029 4918 Eden Avenue Restroom upgrade – demolition and new construction Lower level – 120 SF x $575/SF Upgrade stairs from lower level to main level (includes removal) Metal pan stairs for concrete in-fill, picket rail, 16 risers, w/ landings Replace light fixtures; provide daylighting and occupancy sensors for lighting control – 3,158 SF x $12.50/SF Install R-15 insulation in existing stud wall - 2,420 SF x $6.50/SF Upgrade stairs from main level to balcony (includes removal) Metal pan stairs for concrete in-fill, picket rail, 13 risers, w/ landing 3 of 3 APPENDIX E EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 1 PHOTOS Photo 1: North exterior wall showing brick, stone, and stucco Photo 2: East and north exterior walls showing brick, stone, stucco, and shingled mansards Photo 3: North exterior wall showing brick, wood board and battens, and shingled mansard roof Photo 4: North exterior wall showing brick, stone, wood board and battens, and shingled mansard roof EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 2 PHOTOS Photo 5: West and south exterior walls brick, stone, and board and batten Photo 6: South exterior wall showing stone, brick, wood siding, and shingled mansard roof Photo 7: South exterior wall showing stone, brick, wood siding, and shingled mansard roof Photo 8: South exterior wall showing stone, brick, wood siding, shingled mansard roof, and emergency exit catwalk EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 3 PHOTOS Photo 9: Restroom does not comply with ADA requirements Photo 10: Restroom does not comply with ADA requirements Photo 11: Lower urinal does not comply with ADA clear width requirements Photo 12: Privacy screen missing between urinal and lavatory EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 4 PHOTOS Photo 13: Restroom does not comply with current ADA requirements Photo 14: Restroom does not comply with current ADA requirements Photo 15: Bottom of mirror is too high and does not comply with current ADA requirements Photo 16: Stair tread depth, riser height, and handrails do not comply with current code requirements EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 5 PHOTOS Photo 17: Stair tread depth, riser height, and handrails do not comply with current code requirements Photo 18: Stair tread depth, riser height, and handrails do not comply with current code requirements Photo 19: Lighting does not comply with current energy code requirements Photo 20: Roof drains only. No overflow roof drains. EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 6 PHOTOS Photo 21: Existing built-up roofing system does not comply with current energy code requirements Photo 22: Existing built-up roofing system does not comply with current energy code requirements Photo 23: Rooftop equipment requires regular replacement of filters. Vertical ladder roof access does not meet current codes Photo 24: Rooftop equipment requires regular replacement of filters. Vertical ladder roof access does not meet current codes EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 7 PHOTOS Photo 25: Rooftop equipment requires regular replacement of filters. Vertical ladder roof access does not meet current codes Photo 26: Emergency exit stair tread depth, riser height, and handrails do not comply with current code requirements Photo 27: Historic Cahill School south wall showing lap siding, single-glazed double-hung windows and cedar shingles Photo 28: Historic Cahill School west wall showing lap siding and cedar shingles EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 8 PHOTOS Photo 29: Historic Cahill School north wall showing lap siding, single-glazed double-hung windows and cedar shingles Photo 30: Historic Cahill School east wall showing lap siding, single-glazed double-hung windows and cedar shingles Photo 31: Historic Cahill School accessible wood ramp Photo 32: Historic Cahill School accessible wood ramp and steps EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 9 PHOTOS Photo 33: Historic Cahill School classroom Photo 34: Historic Cahill School coat room and non-ADA compliant accessible entrance through 34” wide door Photo 35: Historic Cahill School non-ADA compliant restroom Photo 36: Historic Cahill School non-ADA compliant restroom EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 10 PHOTOS Photo 37: Historic Cahill School stair tread depth, riser height, and handrails do not comply with current code requirements Photo 38: Minnehaha Grange Hall west elevation with accessible wood ramp and stair Photo 39: Minnehaha Grange Hall south wall showing lap siding, single-glazed double-hung windows and cedar shingles Photo 40: Minnehaha Grange Hall east wall showing lap siding and cedar shingles EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 11 PHOTOS Photo 41: Minnehaha Grange Hall north wall showing lap siding, single-glazed double-hung windows and cedar shingles Photo 42: Minnehaha Grange Hall west wall showing lap siding, single-glazed double-hung windows and cedar shingles Photo 43: Minnehaha Grange Hall meeting room and stage Photo 44: Minnehaha Grange Hall meeting room EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 12 PHOTOS Photo 45: Minnehaha Grange Hall meeting room and balcony Photo 46: Minnehaha Grange Hall meeting room Photo 47: Minnehaha Grange Hall entrance ante room Photo 48: Minnehaha Grange Hall entrance ante room EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 13 PHOTOS Photo 49: Minnehaha Grange Hall stair tread depth, riser height, and handrails do not comply with current code requirements Photo 50: Minnehaha Grange Hall stair tread depth, riser height, and handrails do not comply with current code requirements Photo 51: Minnehaha Grange Hall non-ADA compliant restroom Photo 52: Minnehaha Grange Hall non-ADA compliant restroom EDINA HRA POTENTIAL EDEN/WILLSON AVENUE TIF DISTRICT 193805291 14 PHOTOS Photo 53: Minnehaha Grange Hall lower level kitchen/serving counter Photo 54: Minnehaha Grange Hall lower level gathering room Photo 55: Minnehaha Grange Hall stair tread depth, riser height, and handrails do not comply with current code requirements Photo 56: Minnehaha Grange Hall balcony   Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 21 Appendix E: Project Description The existing commercial building located at 4917 Eden Avenue is proposed to be redeveloped. The new construction will consist of a new Class “A” mixed-use building with approximately 196 mixed-income apartment units and 3,700 square feet of integrated retail space. The development will be located at the intersection of Eden Avenue and Willson Road and is intended to fulfill a portion of the City’s goal for redevelopment as well as provide affordable housing options. The developer will demolish the existing building, perform environmental remediation, and clear the site for redevelopment. The redevelopment will include site water and sanitary sewer utility improvements, area storm water retention, below grade parking stalls to service the apartment units, surface public parking, and sidewalk and streetscape improvements along Eden Avenue and Willson Road. The developer will encumber portions of the site with permanent public easements to make extensive public realm and streetscape improvements. It will also convey a portion of the parcel to be used for future roadway project or public use. The new apartment building will be 7-stories in height with street level commercial space. The rental housing unit mix includes studio, one-bedroom, two-bedroom, and three-bedroom units. Twenty units of affordable housing (10% of total units) are anticipated, all which will be rent- and occupancy-restricted to households earning at or below 50% of the Area Median Income (AMI). The affordable units will be distributed among the studio, one-bedroom and two-bedroom units and remain for a period of at least 20 years. Site clearance is expected to occur in 2022 and new construction is expected to begin that year with completion of the multifamily building as soon as the close of 2023. Related to the redevelopment of this site, the City also envisions public traffic safety enhancements through public improvements to adjacent portions of Eden Avenue, Willson Road, Grange Road and 50th Street. This work is intended to improve pedestrian and bicyclist routes to and through the TIF District. These new routes are intended to address vehicular safety concerns at each intersection and will improve connectivity between the TIF District and adjacent neighborhoods. A conceptual layout of these potential transportation improvements is included below. These public improvements are anticipated to begin as soon as 2023 and will be completed in phases. Additionally, the Edina HRA proposes that consideration be given to relocate two historic buildings located adjacent to the redevelopment at 4918 Eden Avenue. The Grange Hall was originally located near the intersection of 50th and Wooddale while the Cahill School was originally located near 70th and Cahill. The Grange Hall was relocated to the site in the late 1960s prior to the construction of Highway 100 and its related access ramps. Relocation would allow for further redevelopment of the site and public improvements, as well as an opportunity to identify a more suitable location that allows these historic resources to be more accessible to the community.   Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Eden / Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District 22 At this time, a preferred location for the historic buildings has not been identified and there is no imminent timeline for relocation. If relocation is preferred, tax increment could provide a portion of the relocation expenses. The Edina HRA proposes to utilize incremental property taxes generated from the new apartment building to offset a portion of the apartment building’s financing gap. The HRA proposes to reimburse the developer for qualifying costs incurred in its development through the issuance of a Pay-as-you-go TIF Note upon completion. The HRA and City would bear no obligation to use any other funds to pay the TIF Note. The incremental taxes are also proposed to provide funding for necessitated transportation improvements throughout the TIF District and potential building relocation expenses of the two historic buildings. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS NO PARKING2 12.0'SERVICE DRIVEWAY DROP OFF EDEN AVE. BUILDING FFE=935.50 GFE=925.00 R 45' 13 16 R 45' R 69' R 21' R 10' R 5' COURTYARD, PATIO/AMENITY AREA (SEE LANDSCAPE) CONCRETE TRANSFORMER PAD (COORD. WITH MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL) 18.0'18.0' 8.5'8.5' DOG PARK (SEE LANDSCAPE) ACCESSIBLE STALL, SIGNS, STRIPING, ETC. TYP. - (SEE DETAIL) RETAINING WALL W/ FENCE WHERE WALL IS OVER 2.5' TALL (SEE GRADING PLAN & LANDSCAPE ) FLAT CURB W/ 3' TAPERS (SEE DETAIL) FENCE (SEE LANDSCAPE) HEAVY-DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP. (SEE DETAIL) FUTURE B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP. (SEE MNDOT) FUTURE HEAVY-DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) FUTURE EXIT RAMP (COORDINATE WITH CITY / MNDOT) CONCRETE SIDEWALK (SEE DETAIL) LOADING ZONE FUTURE DRIVEWAY POOL (SEE LANDSCAPE) 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' GROUND LEVEL RESTAURANT (SEE ARCH.) ALTERNATE OUTDOOR SPACE (SEE ARCH.) RETAINING WALL W/ FENCE WHERE WALL IS OVER 2.5' TALL (SEE GRADING PLAN & LANDSCAPE ) 5.0' 5.0' 10.0' 10.0' 15.0' 15.0' 10.0' 10.0' 10.0' BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP. (SEE DETAIL) BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (MATCH EXISTING SECTION) BITUMINOUS TRAIL (MATCH EXISTING SECTION) B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP. (SEE DETAIL) CONCRETE SIDEWALK (SEE DETAIL) 6.0' CONCRETE SIDEWALK (SEE DETAIL) BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (MATCH EXISTING SECTION) SCULPTURE (SEE LANDSCAPE) 24.0' HEAVY-DUTY CONCRETE APRON (SEE DETAIL) B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP. (SEE DETAIL) CONCRETE RISERS W/ RAILING (SEE GRADING, ARCHITECTURAL, & STRUCTURAL) CONCRETE RISERS W/ RAILING (SEE GRADING, ARCHITECTURAL, & STRUCTURAL) COURTYARD CONCRETE SIDEWALK (SEE DETAIL) 6 HEAVY-DUTY CONCRETE APRON (SEE DETAIL) HEAVY-DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) RETAINING WALL W/ FENCE WHERE WALL IS OVER 2.5' TALL (SEE GRADING PLAN & LANDSCAPE )R 77' R 53' 24.0' 9.0' 18.0' 24.0'20.0' 9.0' EXISTING MNDOT CONCRETE RETAINING WALL R 5' R 5' R 5' R 5' R 5' R 5' 4.9' FLUSH CURB 9' TAPER 10' TAPER HEAVY-DUTY CONCRETE APRON (SEE DETAIL) SERVICE D R I V E W A Y 6  Architecture Interior Design Landscape ArchitectureEngineering BoarmanKroos VogelGroupInc. EOE License Number I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professionalunder the laws of the State of Minnesota.BKVTB-30x42Engineer Date XX/XX/XXXX24440 Michael J. St. Martin, PE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 21081.00 © 2016 BKV Group, Inc. EOE SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS NOT F O R CONS T R U C TI O N CERTIFICATION DATE 4917 EDEN AVE. 21081.00 XX/XX/XXXX JBT MJS OWNER/DEVELOPER 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL WARNING: AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUNDGopher State One Call SITE PLAN C2-1 REQUIRED SURFACE ACCESSIBLE PARKING: xxx STALLS* *REQUIRED MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES FOR 101-150 STALLS SURFACE ACCESSIBLE PARKING:xxx STALLS ACCESSIBLE PARKING OFF-STREET PARKING CALCULATIONS PROPOSED SURFACE PARKING PROVIDED: 37 STALLS SITE NOTES 1. ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER THE DETAIL SHEET(S) AND STATE/LOCAL JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS. 2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL BE PROVIDED PER CURRENT ADA STANDARDS AND LOCAL/STATE REQUIREMENTS. 3. ALL CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. TYPICAL FULL SIZED PARKING STALL IS 9' X 18' WITH A 24' WIDE TWO WAY DRIVE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 3.0' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. BITUMINOUS IMPREGNATED FIBER BOARD TO BE PLACED AT FULL DEPTH OF CONCRETE ADJACENT TO EXISTING STRUCTURES AND BEHIND CURB ADJACENT TO DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS. 8. SEE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR SITE LIGHTING. CURRENT ZONING:xxx PROPOSED ZONING:xxx BUILDING SETBACK:xxx TOTAL PROPERTY AREA:2.08 AC. AREA OF DISTURBANCE:2.58 AC. EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA: 1.82 AC PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 1.48 AC. SITE DATA SITE PLAN LEGEND CONCRETE SIDEWALK BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT HEAVY-DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SPECIALTY LANDSCAPE PAVING N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 N N NO PARKINGEDEN AVE. BUILDING FFE=935.50 GFE=925.00 922 923 928 923 924 932 93 3 934 9 2 8  25.00 8.0% 929 93 0 93 1 9 2 2 9 2 3 FG. 39.3 FS 4.0%FG. 29.0 FS 4.0%  10:138.54± EX. 38.27± EX. 35.72 37.14 33.5233.04 33.14 33.50 33.14 32.14 32.46 32.33 32.28 32.26 31.72 32.21 32.79 32.33 32.36 33.40 33.40 33.5033.50 TW=???.??? TW=30.42 BW=25.00 BW=25.00 BW=22.75 TW=28.72 28.12 TW=28.57 TW=28.35 27.61 27.51 30.46 TW=28.20 BW=24.74 BW=23.50 BW=23.50 25.00 26.82 27.83 27.934.9%5. 9% 2.0%5.0%1. 7%5.5%1.0%4.0%4.0%1.0% 2.7%3.0%2.7%33.33 33.39 28.94 28.68 28.20 5.0%2.0%8.0% 1.0%2.0%0.5%35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.50 35.20 35.20 35.20 35.20 35.20 35.20 35.20 35.20 35.2035.2035.2035.20 31.10 31.00 31.50 31.63 31.77 31.84 31.78 32.08 34.87 35.35 34.8535.35 35.35 35.02 34.33 33.95 33.63 33.25 32.96 34.69 2.0% 6.7% 7.4%5.6%1.3%4.0%1.6% 1.6%1.6% 34.18 33.00 33.52 33.19 33.98 1.0% 3. 0 % TW=37.60 TW=37.84 TW=37.84 TW=37.10 TW=37.10 TW=37.10 TW=35.30 TW=35.30 TW=35.20 TW=35.20 TW=35.31 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=35.30 BW=33.00 BW=32.58 BW=35.20 37.61± EX.37.50± EX.36.80± EX.36.66± EX.0.7%1.0%2.0%1.5%2.4%3.4%3.5%5.5%7.0%26.77 27.0027.39 27.48 25.0024.89 24.00 25.00 9279269259319339349359349339329 3 7 9 3 6 9 3 5 935 934 935 936 937 938 925932 933934 935936937938 939 34.00 36.57 FUTURE FRONTAGE ROAD FUTURE FRONTAGE ROAD FLUSH CURB 9' TAPER 10' TAPER 92 8 8.0% 26.82 27.83 27.93 28.94 28.68 28.20 5.0% 2.0%8.0% 33.1926.77 27.00 27.39 27.48927926  Architecture Interior Design Landscape ArchitectureEngineering BoarmanKroos VogelGroupInc. EOE License Number I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professionalunder the laws of the State of Minnesota.BKVTB-30x42Engineer Date XX/XX/XXXX24440 Michael J. St. Martin, PE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 21081.00 © 2016 BKV Group, Inc. EOE SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS NOT F O R CONS T R U C TI O N CERTIFICATION DATE 4917 EDEN AVE. 21081.00 XX/XX/XXXX JBT MJS OWNER/DEVELOPER 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL WARNING: AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUNDGopher State One Call GRADING PLAN C3-1 N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 N N GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES, GUTTER/FLOW LINE, FACE OF BUILDING, OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.16 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 3. ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES OF TOP SOIL AND SEED/MULCH OR SOD. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED/MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. 4. FOR SITE RETAINING WALLS "TW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT TOP FACE OF WALL (NOT TOP OF WALL), "GW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT WALL GRADE TRANSITION, AND "BW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT BOTTOM FACE OF WALL (NOT BOTTOM OF BURIED WALL COURSES). 5. STREETS MUST BE CLEANED AND SWEPT WHENEVER TRACKING OF SEDIMENTS OCCURS AND BEFORE SITES ARE LEFT IDLE FOR WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS. A REGULAR SWEEPING SCHEDULE MUST BE ESTABLISHED. 6. DUST MUST BE ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED. 7. SEE SWPPP FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND REQUIREMENTS. 8. SEE UTILITY PLANS FOR WATER, STORM AND SANITARY SEWER INFORMATION. 9. SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND BITUMINOUS TAPER LOCATIONS. 10. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR FINAL SITE STABILIZATION. 11. NOTIFY CITY OF EDINA ENGINEERING DEPT. AT 952-826-0371, AT LEAST 24 HOURS PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF STORMWATER BMP'S. NO PARKINGGRAPHIC LEGEND: CIP STANDARD GRAY CONCRETE, BROOM FINISHED, TYP. TURFGRASS: SOD, IRRIGATED (SEE SPEC) PLANTING BED #1: ROCK MULCH, 4" MIN., MIXED SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS PER PLANT SCHEDULE PLANTING BED #2: HARDWOOD MULCH, 4" MIN., MIXED SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS PER PLANT SCHEDULE CIP COLORED CONCRETE, BROOM FINISHED, TYP. SHORTGRASS PRAIRIE, SEED MIX TBD PROPOSED PLANT SCHEDULE: TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH G Architecture Interior Design Landscape Architecture Engineering BK V R O U P 222 North Second Street Long & Kees Bldg Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.339.3752 www.bkvgroup.com © 2019 BKV Group SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY COMMISSION NUMBER PROJECT TITLE CONSULTANTS N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N CERTIFICATION BIM 360://2286-05_4917 Eden Ave/2286-05_4917 Eden Ave_LAND_2019.rvt3/12/2021 4:47:23 PMSB BH 2286-05 L101 SITE - PLANTING PLAN 4917 EDEN AVE ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN 1" = 20'-0"L101 1 SITE - PLANTING PLAN QTY SYM COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME PLANTING SIZE PERENNIALS/VINES/ANNUALS 1 ac MAGGIE DALEY ASTILBE Astilbe chinensis 'Maggie Daley'#1 CONT. 1 ca FEATHER REED GRASS Calamagrostis arundinacea var. brachtytricha #1 CONT. 1 hb BLUE ANGEL HOSTA Hosta 'Blue Angel'#1 CONT. 1 hh HAPPY RETURNS DAYLILY Hemerocallis 'Happy Returns'#1 CONT. 1 pa HAMELN FOUNTAIN GRASS Pennisetum alopecuroides 'Hameln'#1 CONT. 1 pt PACHYSANDRA 'Green Carpet'Pachysandra terminalis 'Green Carpet'#1 CONT. 1 pv NORTHWIND SWITCHGRASS Panicum virgatum 'Northwind'#1 CONT. 1 rh WALKER'S LOW CATMINT Nepeta x faassenii 'Walker's Low'#1 CONT. 1 sh PRAIRIE DROPSEED Sporobolus heterolepis #1 CONT. 1 ss LITTLE BLUESTEM 'Blue Heaven'Schizachyrium scoparium 'Minnblue A' (PP17, 310) #1 CONT. ORNAMENTAL TREES 7 AG AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY Amelanchir x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance'2" CAL. 2 BP WHITESPIRE BIRCH (CLUMP)Betula populifolia 'Whitespire'2.5" CAL. 8 CC NORTHERN CLUMP REDBUD Cercis canadensis #20 CONT. 5 SR SUMMER STORM LILAC Syringa reticulata 'Summer Storm' (PPAF)2" CAL. DECIDUOUS TREES 8 AS GREEN MOUNTAIN SUGAR MAPLE Acer saccharum 'Green Mountain'2.5" CAL. 7 BN RIVER BIRCH Betula nigra 2.5" CAL. 6 BP DAKOTA PINNACLE BIRCH Betula platyphylla 'Fargo'2.5" CAL. 3 GB AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO Ginkgo Biloba 'Autumn Gold'2.5" CAL. 8 GT SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST Gleditsia triacanthos var. inermis 'Skycole'2.5" CAL. 6 PT PRAIRIE GOLD ASPEN Populus tremuloides 'NEArb'2.5" CAL. 8 QA QUAKING ASPEN Populous tremuloides #20 CONT. 7 QB SWAMP WHITE OAK Quercus bicolor 2.5" CAL. 5 QW KINDRED SPIRIT OAK Quercus x warei 'Nadler'2.5" CAL. 5 TA AMERICAN SENTRY LINDEN Tilia americana 'MnKSentry'2.5" CAL. DECIDUOUS SHRUBS 1 Bw NORTHERN CHARM BOXWOOD Buxus 'Wilson'#3 CONT. 1 Cc SUGARTINA CLETHRA Clethra alnifolia 'Crystalina' (PP21, 561)#2 CONT. 1 Cf ARCTIC FIRE DOGWOOD Cornus stolonifera 'Farrow' (PP18,523)#5 CONT. 1 Cs CARDINAL DOGWOOD Cornus sericea 'Cardinal'#5 CONT. 1 Ds BUTTERFLY BUSH HONEYSUCKLE Diervilla sessilifolia 'Butterfly'#5 CONT. 1 Dw DWARF WINGED EUONYMOU Euonymous alatus 'Compactus'#10 CONT. 1 Ra GRO LOW SUMAC Rhus aromatica 'Gro Low'#5 CONT. 1 Sm DWARF KOREAN LILAC Syringe meyeri 'Palibin'#5 CONT. 1 Sr RED ELDERBERRY Sambucus racemosa #5 CONT. 1 Ss SEM FALSE SPIREA Sorbaria sorbifolia 'Sem'(PP16,336)#2 CONT. CONIFEROUS TREES 1 JC SPARTAN JUNIPER Juniper chinensis 'Spartan'6' B&B 12 PA NORWAY SPRUCE Picea abies 8' B&B 7 PS WHITE PINE Pinus Strobus 6' B&B CONIFEROUS SHRUBS 1 Cp KING'S GOLD CHAMAECYPARIS Chamaecyparis pisifera 'King's gold'#5 CONT. 1 Ct HEATHERBUN CHAMAECYPARIS Chamaecyparis thyoides 'Heather Bun'#5 CONT. 1 Jh BLUE CHIP JUNIPER Juniperus horizontalis 'Blue Chip'#5 CONT. 1 Jp SEA GREEN JUNIPER Juniperus x pfitseriana 'Sea Green'#5 CONT. 1 Js BLUE FOREST JUNIPER Juniperus sabina 'Blue Forest'#5 CONT. 1 Pb SCHOODIC PINE Pinus banksiana 'Schoodic'#3 CONT. 1 Tc TECHNITO ARBORVITAE Thuja occidentalis 'Bailjohn' (PP15, 850)6' B&B *PLANT SCHEDULE FOR SPECIES REFERENCE ONLY, FINAL QUANTITIES TO BE DETERMINED IRRIGATION NOTE: ALL PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE DRIPLINE IRRIGATION, ALL TURF AREAS TO RECEIVE SPRAY NOZZLES The CITYofEDINAEstablishing the Eden / Willson Tax Increment Financing DistrictEdina City CouncilPublic HearingOctober 19, 2021www.EdinaMN.gov The CITYofEDINA2Photo Source: Minnesota Historic Society1957 aerial photo - Normandale Road- At grade intersections- Cement factory- Halla Nursery- Old Village HallBackgroundBiltmoreCement FactoryHallaCedricsVillage HallBowling The CITYofEDINA3Photo Source: Minnesota Historic SocietyThe large white areas in this 1957 aerial photo shows how much of the Greater SouthdaleBackground1979 aerial photo - Highway 100- New bridges and ramps- Old Public Works facility- Perkins restaurant- Old Village HallEdina Public WorksJerrysPerkinsOLG ChurchBowlingBiltmoreVillage Hall The CITYofEDINA4Photo Source: Minnesota Historic SocietyGrange Hall4918 Eden AveBuilt 1879, relocated 1935 & 1970Background – existing conditionsPerkins (formerly Halla Nursery)4917 Eden AveBuilt 1973Cahill School4918 Eden AveBuilt 1864, relocated1970 The CITYofEDINA54917 Eden Avenue- Restaurant, office and conference facilities- Land has higher value than building- Building deemed “sub-standard” per TIF statuteBackground – existing conditions4918 Eden Avenue- Two historic buildings Grange Hall & Cahill School- Relocated to this site in 30s and 70s- Buildings deemed “sub-standard” per TIF statutes49184917Roadway Network- High peak-hour traffic volume- Lack complete sidewalks- Limited bicycle routes The CITYofEDINA6Background -Community Vision PlansMulti-modal Transportation Options - … improve access for pedestrians and bicyclists...” (SERP 3-4(4); GDF page 7 and GTP pages 23-24)Mixed Use Development… support redevelopment that includes retail, housing and employment in walkable neighborhoods (SERP page 3-4(6))Highway Access… allow for surface roads / off-ramps … safe interchange access to Highway 100 from Vernon, 50th& Eden...” (GDF page 34) The CITYofEDINA7Photo Source: Minnesota Historic SocietySummary of Proposal – westerly viewFINAL REZONING APPROVAL PENDING The CITYofEDINA8Photo Source: Minnesota Historic SocietySummary of Proposal – southeasterly viewFINAL REZONING APPROVAL PENDING The CITYofEDINA9Photo Source: Minnesota Historic SocietySummary of Proposal – roadway conceptFINAL DESIGN APPROVAL PENDING The CITYofEDINA10Photo Source: Minnesota Historic SocietySummary of Proposal – financial gapgapThe developer requested $5.1 million in TIF support over 15-years to make the project viable.This request has been analyzed and evaluated. The budget gap has been confirmed. Term Sheet was prepared August 26, 2021. Full TIF Redevelopment Agreement anticipated to be considered November 3, 2021. The CITYofEDINA11What is TIF?Availability of Property Taxes to Taxing AgenciesAvailability of Property Taxes to Taxing AgenciesAvailability of Property Taxes to Taxing AgenciesAvailability of Property Taxes to Taxing Agencies“Incremental Taxes” Remain in TIF DistrictOriginal + Market Value Taxes Available to AllOriginal + Incremental Taxes Available to AllYear 1Year 26 Year 40+•Economic development financing tool•Governed by Minnesota Statute•Enabled by City Council•“Tax Increment” Financing - uses growth in property tax base to fund private investment and public infrastructureYear 3$54.8 M$3.0 M The CITYofEDINA12What is TIF? – How cities fund projectsOriginal Taxes Available to AllPreferred method in EdinaUsually avoided in Edina (unless special conditions exist)Developer PledgeRoadway Improvements The CITYofEDINAWhat is TIF? – Steps to Establish & Monitor13•Boundaries•Maximum Budget•Term•Qualifications•But-forStep 1)Create “District”•Private developments•Public improvementsStep 2)Consider Funding for Specific Projects•4-year knock down•5-year construction•Annual reporting•De-certificationStep 3) Monitoring & ComplianceAction considered todayAction considered in futurePlan CommissionHRA BoardPublic HearingCity CouncilHRA Board (Oct 28 and 2023)City Council (Nov 3 and 2023) The CITYofEDINA14Edina has used TIF financing since the 1970s and currently has 9 active TIF Districts:• 4040 W. 70th• 44th& France 2• 50th& France 2• 66 West• 76thStreet• Amundson• Grandview 2• Pentagon Park• Southdale 2TIF in EdinaProposedEden WillsonTIF District The CITYofEDINATIF in Edina is used on a limited basis and to a lesser extent than neighboring citiesTIF in Edina5.0% in 202115 The CITYofEDINA•2 parcels & adjacent roadways•“Redevelopment” District•25 year term•Original Tax Capacity = $60,842•Projected Tax Capacity = $691,772- Used to establish maximum budget16Proposed TIF Plan The CITYofEDINA$22.7 million - Incremental Property Tax Estimate•Over 26 years term•Includes interest earnings•Excludes base taxes to County, School, and City17Projected Uses of Tax Increment Funds•Acquisition $3.0 M (11%)•Site improvements $750k•Utilities $1.5 M•Affordable Housing $2.06 M (9%)•Other Improvements $5.55 M (24%)•Administrative $2.06 M (9%)•Interest $7.8 M (34%)•Total $22.7 MillionPages 8-9 of TIF PlanProposed TIF Plan –Sources and Uses The CITYofEDINAIn Conclusion: it is not reasonably expected that the proposed redevelopment with long-term affordable housing and public improvements will be constructed without the use of Tax Increment Financing.•Site qualifies as a Redevelopment TIF District•Plans complies with the City’s general plans for redevelopment (Comp. Plan)•High development costs and restricted rental income creates a financial gap that that hinders the delivery of the proposal18Proposed TIF Plan –Findingsgap The CITYofEDINA19Questions / Discussion Survey Responses 30 January 2019 - 28 October 2021 Public Hearing Comments-Eden WillsonTIF District Better Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: Eden / Willson Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District . VISITORS 39 CONTRIBUTORS 27 RESPONSES 28 7 Registered 0 Unverified 20 Anonymous 7 Registered 0 Unverified 21 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 17, 2021 15:20:32 pm Last Seen:Oct 17, 2021 15:20:32 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name william and meredith davis Q2.Address 6616 cornelia drive edina mn Q3.Comment We support all forms of affordable housing in Edina, especially those that for folks at the lowest income level. We support these even if they are in "our neighborhood" and even if they cause increase in taxes. Thank you. Respondent No:2 Login:Barry Email:BARRY.ROSENTHAL@OU TLOOK.COM Responded At:Oct 19, 2021 08:55:39 am Last Seen:Oct 19, 2021 15:53:22 pm IP Address:34.215.242.79 Q1.First and Last Name Barry Rosenthal Q2.Address 6205 Scotia Drive Q3.Comment I want to add my support for this proposal. This development will be a nice addition to our city center, address traffic issues and increase the supply of affordable housing in a desirable location Respondent No:3 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 19, 2021 09:05:56 am Last Seen:Oct 19, 2021 09:05:56 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Cynthia Olson Q2.Address 4808 W Sunnyslope Rd Q3.Comment Members Staunton and Pierce gave conditional approval to the building project based on an improvement in the traffic patterns for Sunnyslope. Adding left turn lanes to 50th street, as indicated in their diagram, will NOT address concerns around traffic: Speed on 50th Street Volume of traffic Pedestrian and Bicycle safety Buffer zone between sidewalk and lanes of traffic Access to 50th Street from East Sunnyslope and Dale Drive, especially when trying to head east on 50th In fact, the corrective action ONLY includes left turn lanes, conditions will deteriorate from current state as drivers speed up because they no longer have to be concerned about cars making left turns. Consequently, Members Staunton and Pierce ought to join Member Anderson and retract their conditional approval of the project. Respondent No:4 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 19, 2021 15:58:51 pm Last Seen:Oct 19, 2021 15:58:51 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Kirk Aadalen Q2.Address 4800 Hilltop Lane, Edina MN 55424 Q3.Comment I am strongly opposed to the project that is being proposed for this site. It is much too large and out of place for this site. I am not opposed to redevelopment of this site but feel it should stay within the Comprehensive Plan guidelines. Respondent No:5 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 20, 2021 07:42:38 am Last Seen:Oct 20, 2021 07:42:38 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Mark and Julie Manfred Q2.Address 4445 Dunham Dr, Edina Q3.Comment I urge the Council to reject TIF for redevelopment of the Perkins site, and for other projects as well. TIF is intended for blighted areas and that area is not blighted. TIF adversely affects Edina's financial status. The proposed project is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Respondent No:6 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 20, 2021 08:14:38 am Last Seen:Oct 20, 2021 08:14:38 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Cynthia Olson Q2.Address 4808 W Sunnyslope Rd Q3.Comment Nextdoor app has comments that all of city council should look at. https://nextdoor.com/p/szryxfgC_6Tw? utm_source=share&extras=MjYwNTYy Respondent No:7 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 20, 2021 09:24:55 am Last Seen:Oct 20, 2021 09:24:55 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Mike Welbaum Q2.Address 7232 Monardo Lane Q3.Comment Vote "NO!" The project does not comply with Comp plan. TIF is not appropriate for this project. Please return to earth and honor the will of the people... Edina residents who pay taxes here. Vote "NO!" Respondent No:8 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 20, 2021 13:18:24 pm Last Seen:Oct 20, 2021 13:18:24 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Gregg Swedberg Q2.Address 6700 Brittany Road Q3.Comment Why in the world is TIF financing appropriate for anything other than the Perkins site? What's going into the other space? Why would it be appropriate to build anything there, right across the street from Sunnyslope? What is being done to improve the traffic on 50th street? Why hasn't the council asked for development plans that work into the Comprehensive plan? Respondent No:9 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 20, 2021 17:01:09 pm Last Seen:Oct 20, 2021 17:01:09 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Steve Brown Q2.Address 5528 Halifax Lane Q3.Comment Mayor and Council Members, I am writing to urge you to support the creation of the Eden. Wilson Tax Increment Financing District. The establishment of this TIF district will allow the project to build a very attractive 7 story market rate apartment building at the old Perkins Site to proceed. This building will provide 10% (20 units) that are affordable to households earning up to 50% AMI. It is worth noting that this is a good location for affordable housing given its easy access to transit, jobs, grocery and drug stores. This redevelopment of the current Perkins site will also provide public parking and dedicated public land for the future public improvement of the interchange between Highway 100 and Vernon Ave/50th. To its credit, the Council, in an effort led by Council member Pierce, committed to ensuring that the potential traffic issues created by this project were addressed as an integral part of the approval process. To that end, this redevelopment will provide the funding source for the public improvements to car, pedestrian, and bicycle traffic that are needed to the roadway network on Eden, Wilson, Grange and 50th St. that serves this site and the surrounding neighborhoods, most notably the Sunnyside neighborhood. These improvements will benefit not only this project and the surrounding neighborhoods but also all the many users of 50th street. While some members of the community object to using TIF financing, and may do so in this case because of the high land purchase price included in the TIF plan, it is important to keep in mind that with the termination of the Southdale 2 TIF district in just a few short months, the City’s use of TIF financing as a % of its tax base will fall from 5.0% to 1.1%, putting it well below most neighboring cities in its use of TIF dollars. I thank you for approving the site and design plans for this project and urge you to take the next step of creating the TIF district needed to make this project a reality. Respondent No:10 Login:Chrisb Email:cbremer101@gmail.com Responded At:Oct 20, 2021 18:02:49 pm Last Seen:Oct 21, 2021 01:00:20 am IP Address:174.20.25.118 Q1.First and Last Name Chris Bremer Q2.Address 6001 Ewing Ave S Q3.Comment I support Resolution 2021-99, establishing the Eden Wilson Tax Increment Financing District, which will support redevelopment of the Perkins site near Highway 100 and 50th Street. This is an ideal site for needed market-rate housing and will provide 20 new units of affordable housing located within the Edina School District. Passage of this resolution will also provide public land for a future improved Highway 100 interchange and funding for related improvements to the roadway network (Eden, Wilson, Grange and 50th) that serves the building site and nearby neighborhoods. Housing is in short supply in the Twin Cities area, as evidenced by low vacancy rates and rising home prices and rents. There is an acute need for affordable housing with easy access to groceries, jobs, and transit, which not only provides convenience for all building residents but reduces the carbon footprint per family compared to single-family housing. I am particularly excited about this redevelopment project because it will provide affordably priced housing within the boundaries of the Edina School District. Most of Edina’s affordable units are outside the Edina School District boundaries. I grew up in a two- bedroom apartment in a building of a similar size to this one, and I hope we will have a number of children living in the building and attending our excellent schools. Respondent No:11 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 21, 2021 06:47:07 am Last Seen:Oct 21, 2021 06:47:07 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Robin Hansen Q2.Address 4921 West Sunnyslope Road Q3.Comment I’m responding to the Perkins redevelopment project. We have lived in Sunnyslope since 2005 and the changes to our area and increased traffic have been quite detrimental to our quality of life that we would expect from Edina. We are very disappointed that the Perkins redevelopment is progressing even with so much public outcry. Given that this is happening, we would request that traffic modifications are made to ease our impact in Sunnyslope. Please help slow down traffic for safety reasons and helping our entry and exit out of Dale and East Sunnyslope. Right now only Dale is being addressed - with a safer going east in 50th by going right (west first) then uturning in designated lane at the light or going behind city hall. Coming from west to east we also need a designated left turn into Dale on the other side of the boulevard. In addition, please help slow traffic from Wooddale to 100 by narrowing lanes. Drivers use this stretch as an acceleration ramp to 100. It is not safe for our neighborhood or our families of Edina. Thank you. Respondent No:12 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 21, 2021 06:52:01 am Last Seen:Oct 21, 2021 06:52:01 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name REBECCA Anne CASHIN Q2.Address 110 7th Avenue North Q3.Comment Please don't tear down the Perkins building, that's the one place in edina i really love going that's not to snobby stuck up and if you get rid of it plus it's huge American flag everyone can see off highway 100 day or night it would be very sad. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respondent No:13 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 21, 2021 08:26:16 am Last Seen:Oct 21, 2021 08:26:16 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name FRANK LERMAN Q2.Address 6112 Creek Valley Rd Q3.Comment If the developer's plan is not financially viable without a TIF, he should modify his plans. If no plan is financially viable without a TIF, it must be the case that the developer overpaid for the land. While I do not enjoy seeing developers lose money because of their bad decisions, I enjoy even less the use of taxpayer money to bail out developers. If some public amenities (e.g., bike lanes) are desired for some public land that is included in the TIF district, the city can plan and pay for the amenities itself, using the money that would otherwise be given to the developer via the TIF district. NO TIF!!!!!!!!!! Respondent No:14 Login:Sara McGrane Email:saramcgrane@hotmail.com Responded At:Oct 24, 2021 10:18:20 am Last Seen:Oct 24, 2021 16:27:07 pm IP Address:66.41.95.157 Q1.First and Last Name Sara McGrane Q2.Address 4913 W Sunnyslope Rd, Edina, MN. 55424 Q3.Comment I have lived in the Sunnyslope neighborhood for 13 years and this has been the only time I've reached out to the City on an issue. We appreciate the opportunity to speak, and the City's willingness to listen. While I appreciate the work that has done to date, I do not think the traffic issue is resolved completely or satisfactorily. It is hard for an experienced driver to get in and out of our neighborhood, let alone a new driver. Traffic on 50th moves rapidly, it is narrow, and there are often children riding bikes to school or people out walking. I was pleased to hear about the dedicated left turn from 50th going East turning into Dale Drive. But I hope you will also consider a dedicated left turn lane and turn signal from 50th going West onto Grange Road. As someone who exits Sunnyslope from Dale Drive, I am also concerned about removing the ability to turn left from Dale Drive. That will also increase drivers on East Sunnyslope turning left. Again, I thank you for listening, and hope that you will address these important issues before the completion of the Perkins project or the Vernon Avenue bridge project. Respondent No:15 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 24, 2021 10:24:19 am Last Seen:Oct 24, 2021 10:24:19 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Steven Lundberg Q2.Address 4801 Hilltop Lane Q3.Comment Dear Mayor and City Council, I thank the City for listening to the concerns of the Sunnyslope neighborhood and coming up with some concepts for us to discuss. I do not believe a "satisfactory plan for resolution of transportation system issues east of Highway 100 in the Grandview district by the City" has been presented. My main concerns are the speed of the traffic along 50th making turns into and out of our neighborhood more difficult and risky than they need to be, and the safety of pedestrians and cyclists on the sidewalk. Action I think the City should take now: narrowing of the lanes (to slow traffic based on suggestion of Chad Millner), with the addition of a white line adjacent to the curb (to increase pedestrian safety). I think this narrowing should start at Woodale/50th intersection and extend all the way up to Grange Road and Hwy #100. Other thoughts concerning the City’s plans for development along 50th: • Edina residents have identified in City conducted surveys that 50th between 100 and Wooddale is the most dreaded/least safe place to ride a bike. And even walking there is uncomfortable due to roadway directly adjacent sidewalks (no boulevard) and speeding being the norm. Many tickets are given out for cars heading East but none for traffic heading West that I have ever seen. In any event, the ticketing seems more like a revenue generating enterprise as opposed to a genuine effort to slow traffic as there are better means available to slow traffic that have never been deployed in 50 years of speeding along that stretch. I can say 50 years with conviction because I got a ticket for speeding there in 1971. • The City’s Comprehensive Plan sets as a top goal the upgrading of the City's transportation network to include multimodal transportation including bike and pedestrian modes (aka "living streets"). • Multi-modal living streets are also goals of Hennepin County and State • 50th between 100 and Wooddale lacks any bike lanes and has poor walkability as noted above. • Luxury apartment buildings on 50th corridor are adding to the need for a safer 50th, as over 200 new occupants will be added on the Perkins site along, some of which will be children trying to get to Wooddale Park. • The Mayor promoted “The Lid” over Hwy 100 on the basis it would “connect” East and West Edina. He was willing and able to find funding for this rather costly endeavor. • The stretch of 50th between 100 and Wooddale IS the major connector of East and West Edina residential and commercial districts. Certainly it connects Grandview to 50th and France, two population density hubs. • While the City finds funds for street improvements all over town, including adding (and subtracting) bike lanes on miles of streets, and adding roundabouts (I like them BTW), • According to the City's traffic whiz, Chad Millner, the City has no resources to improve 50th, THE most travelled street in Edina and probably THE MOST IMPORTANT CONNECTOR of East and West Edina. Also, the City seems to be devoid of any thoughts whatsoever to share with its residents as to how 50th might achieve a "living street" status. Apparently no funding for creative thought (or indeed any thought) either? • Yet City was willing to find funds to finance the Lid, make street improvements, and subsidize luxury apartments all over. Especially good to know that apartments renting for $7,000 to $10,000 a month in downtown Edina could be built with TIF funds and pay no taxes to support the operations of Edina. The millionaires renting the penthouses there need subsidized housing? How about the future residents of the penthouses at the proposed Perkin's site? They need subsidized housing too? • This makes zero sense. At the very least, TIF financing should be tailored to only exempt from taxation those units that are actually affordable, not the entire building. TIF is being absolutely abused by rich suburbs like Edina to finance housing the large bulk of which is for "rich" metro residents, and ultimately build an even bigger concentration of high income households. • Finally, affordable housing policy of the City needs rethinking – as it is an inherently temporary measure that will ultimately result in the eviction of the recipients, recipients who will have made a home in Edina, and then forced to move when their units go back to market rate. Added by City at great expense in luxury apartments, it is temporary and meager in size, and more remarkably is in the same price range as normal market rate apartments in most other suburbs. Further, it is largely if not entirely unaffordable to the demographics we are most trying to help, and that were most disadvantaged by Edina’s restrictive covenants of the past. • As such Edina’s temporary affordable housing seems more like a head fake to affordable housing advocates than a serious permanent effort. In the (not) very long run all will be back to unaffordable housing in Edina, and the affordable housing residents sent packing. Even someone dead set against affordable housing should like the City’s approach especially if they are younger because when they are in their 40’s and 50’s all the affordable units being built now will be gone or nearing expiration. And Edina will be back to where it once started. Respondent No:16 Login:Ann Makredes Email:amakr@msn.com Responded At:Oct 24, 2021 11:33:09 am Last Seen:Oct 20, 2021 20:30:38 pm IP Address:75.72.144.184 Q1.First and Last Name Ann and Steve Makredes Q2.Address 4916 West Sunnyslope Road, Edina, MN 55424 Q3.Comment We would like to thank the City Council for listening to our concerns. We have studied the Traffic report and TIF funding request in more detail and offer the following comments: We oppose the creation of the TIF district as a matter of principle. Thoughtful master planning is the only way to solve our interconnected regional traffic and safety concern not ad-hoc projects that are TIF funded and not interconnected or sequenced correctly. Tax Payers fund all the work of Government and TIF funding is still a Tax – just in a less direct way. Regardless of the funding mechanism, the traffic and safety issues still exist and we would like to provide our thoughts on the ideas proposed. As a neighborhood we met with Chad Millner, Bill Neuendorf and Cary Teague on Wednesday 10/20/2021 and have a follow-up meeting on Monday 10/25. We are not convinced that the traffic and safety concerns on 50th can be mitigated by work conducted just in the proposed TIF district. At a minimum the work needs to extend to Wooddale. We do think that a low cost immediate solution would be to “narrow” the existing lanes with paint striping for a perceived narrowing and per Chad as a proven speed mitigation measure. The left turn pocket from 50th into Dale drive also appears to be able to be completed with just paint (at least temporarily) We are concerned with the width of the new combined of dedicated Bike/Pedestrian path – it appears to take significant right way from residents and would only extend the length of the TIF district with an abrupt stop – essentially a bike path to nowhere. This path could be more appropriately designed and directed into the Eden Ave side of City Hall. Avoiding 50th street there would make it safer for bikers. We are also concerned about the timings of all of these separate projects. The Vernon Ave Bridge replacement is scheduled for 2023 (a major disruption), the Perkins project we would anticipate to begin in 2022 and finish in 2023? Chad mentioned the improvement to 50th would then follow? After all the development? Turning back to the TIF district – the 3 reasons the developer is requesting TIF funds do not seem to add up to $5.1 million. The public art they are proposing is not a significant investment – may be $10,000. Per the City new Affordable Housing Policy – a project of this size and scale with rezoning – affordable housing is required as the cost of doing business in Edina. That leaves the transfer of the right of way for a future highway 100 interchange. Only 1 of the 3 options presented in the traffic study requires the use of this land. So really hard to see that valued at $5.1 million. Please don’t give away our Tax dollars so easily to a private for profit business. We also would like to extend an invitation to walk our neighborhood and see first hand our thoughts, concerns and ideas. Mayor Hovland, please consider this as a welcome invitation for an upcoming “March with the Mayor”. We urge you to not consider the “do nothing” option – our neighborhood is isolated and extremely vulnerable to the increased development and traffic in this section of Edina. We look forward to working with you to find solutions. Thank you, Ann and Steve Makredes 4916 West Sunnyslope Road Respondent No:17 Login:DSF Email:david@friesnet.com Responded At:Oct 24, 2021 14:19:11 pm Last Seen:Oct 24, 2021 21:10:55 pm IP Address:205.164.230.2 Q1.First and Last Name David and Michelle Fries Q2.Address 4813 West Sunnyslope Road Q3.Comment We are the the owners of a property located in the Sunnyslope Neighborhood in Edina proximate to the Perkins development site, and we applaud the City for listening to our concerns and coming up with some options for us to discuss. At this point, we are not convinced a "satisfactory plan for resolution of transportation system issues east of Highway 100 in the Grandview district by the City" has been presented. One of our main concerns is the speed of the traffic along 50th Street. While we like the dedicated left turn from 50th going east turning into Dale Drive and the dedicated left turn lane and turn signal from 50th going west onto Grange Road, we are very concerned about removing the ability to turn left from Dale Drive, to go East on 50th. We believe that all improvements should be completed prior to any certificates of occupancy being issues for the Perkins project or commencement of the Vernon Avenue bridge reconstruction. We recommend that the City immediately narrow the lanes (to slow traffic) starting at the Wooddale/50th intersection and extending all the way up to Grange Road and Hwy 100, and also add a white line adjacent to the curb (to increase pedestrian safety). Respondent No:18 Login:Janet Dietrich Email:jgrangaard@msn.com Responded At:Oct 24, 2021 19:15:51 pm Last Seen:Oct 25, 2021 01:26:37 am IP Address:75.73.175.244 Q1.First and Last Name Janet Dietrich Q2.Address 4816 Woodhill Way Q3.Comment These comments will attempt to describe my viewpoint about the Perkins site at 4917 Eden Avenue from a 30,000-foot perspective. To begin, I do not believe that the conditions stated by Members Pierce and Staunton, related to a comprehensive solution to the traffic issues on 50th Street, will have been met by the preliminary proposal put forth by Mr. Chad Milner, both at the City Council meeting on Oct. 19th and during a Zoom call with the Sunnyslope neighborhood. Consequently, I would advocate that Members Pierce and Staunton retract any support they may have conditionally shown for a 7-story apartment building at 4917 Eden Avenue, reject the TIF request, and instead move that the City Council insist on a 4-story building, consistent with the original zoning of the parcel. I do not intend to criticize Mr. Milner’s efforts – on the contrary, I very much appreciate them. However, given that the problems with traffic speed and safety originate at Wooddale Avenue and not at the indicated boundary of the TIF district, Mr. Milner’s task was virtually impossible. TIF or no TIF, there will still be traffic issues on 50th Street which affect Edina and Minneapolis residents using the artery and most acutely affect the residents of the Sunnyslope Neighborhood. That does not mean the City should not try to mitigate these issues now that they have been officially recognized as a problem. To do so would be governmental nonfeasance. Mr. Milner shared research with the Sunnyslope neighbors that shows that painting narrower traffic lanes slows the speed of travel. This could be implemented immediately from Wooddale Avenue to Grange Road at minimal cost to the City. Why this hasn’t been done in the past is a mystery, especially given that so many other streets in Edina have been repainted in a similar manner. Nevertheless, it is not too late to make this first improvement. Additionally, I know that other Sunnyslope residents have suggestions for low-cost improvements so I will refer you to those letters instead of repeating their ideas here. One objection I anticipate is the idea that Reuter Walton will walk away from the Perkins site if they do not receive taxpayer support via the declaration of a TIF District. I do not believe this will be the case, and even if it is, I am confident there will be other developers interested in the future. If rumor is correct, RW has agreed to pay $12 million for the parcel, far exceeding the Assessed Value of approximately $3.1 million. This is not the rational action of a reluctant buyer. The purchase price indicates what we all know to be true – that the Perkins parcel is an attractive, highly visible and desirable piece of real estate in the heart of Edina. Agreeing to subsidize construction at this site indicates the City feels it is negotiating with a weak hand, not the strong hand that it actually holds. The City has the authority to require any developer to include affordable housing in its plan, rather than spend the equivalent of $250,000 per affordable unit to accomplish this goal. Agreeing to declare a TIF district for Reuter Walton, fearful that they may refuse to build without it, is akin to marrying the first person who asked you out on a date, despite the fact that they weren’t a good fit from the start. Edina should hold out for a better proposal. Another reason to reject a TIF District request is the impact on the Edina Public School District. It was disingenuous to reject my husband, Steve’s Dietrich’s concern expressed at the Oct. 19th City Council meeting, that the TIF District would “short change” the school system, despite remitting a constant $33,000 of tax proceeds to the District annually. I know that he has written a letter detailing the corrosive effect of compound inflation so I will commend you to read that carefully. In summary, the District will lose hundreds of thousands of dollars in purchasing power over the course of a 30-year TIF – money that will need to be collected from other taxpayers (Edina residents and/or commercial and industrial property owners) in order to provide the quality of education the residents, and especially young students, of Edina expect and deserve from its schools. The School system is the crown jewel of Edina and the reason many people move to the City. It should not be starved of future increases in tax revenue for the benefit of developers. There are at least 2 other reasons to reject a TIF request for the Perkins site. The first is that it is morally reprehensible to subsidize, in effect if not in name, luxury apartments with taxpayer money. 90.4% of the units in RW’s plan will be exactly that – luxury apartments, some with a beautiful country club view. I know the Council is familiar with this reasoning so I will not elaborate here. The other reason is that this parcel may be “blighted” in the technical definition approved by the state, but it is not blighted in the common understanding of the word, indicating a dilapidated condition that is a public nuisance. Given that the City intends to use TIF sparingly, declaring a TIF district for this parcel serves to impede the designation of a TIF for a parcel that is actually blighted in both the technical and colloquial use of the word. Better to keep that powder dry than to use it where it isn’t needed. In sum, I believe the Council would be wise to: insist on a 4-story complex; implement narrower driving lanes and other simple improvements on 50th street; and reserve its power to declare a TIF district for a parcel that truly merits the assistance. Edina does not need to act desperate for developer attention. Respondent No:19 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 24, 2021 19:09:06 pm Last Seen:Oct 24, 2021 19:09:06 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Bruce Gustafson Q2.Address 4808 W SUNNYSLOPE RD Q3.Comment Council Members Thank you for your time and consideration in reading my comments on the proposed redevelopment of the Perkins site. I do not believe that the proposed engineering solution solves the primary issues of the Sunnyslope neighborhood in remediating the impact from the Perkins site project - which is to improve traffic and pedestrian safety on 50th Street. While Edina cannot reduce the existing traffic on 50th Street it can and should develop a comprehensive plan to limit volume growth by providing options to keep traffic off 50th Street as much as possible. This I believe requires traffic planning that incorporates not just the Perkins site development, but all of the anticipated/ envisioned volume generated by the master plan for development of the area including development west of Highway 100 - which will surely put more traffic on to 50th street. Existing traffic on 50th Street today can and does block the entry/ exit from Dale Drive. Additional traffic moving at existing speeds will exacerbate the problem and make an attempt to move eastbound on 50th even more challenging and time consuming given the required right hand exit from Dale, crossing two lanes to the left hand turn (on Grange Road), and U-turn on 50th. The proposed solution is at best cumbersome with existing traffic and will be worse with the additional volumes generated from the Perkins site and other future development in the area. The proposed traffic circles and possible changes to the entry/exit options to Highway 100 (which is not considered part of the current traffic evaluation) will continue to funnel more volume on to 50th Street. Again, I believe that a piecemeal study and solutioning to the development of the greater Highway 100 area is inappropriate and does a disservice to the citizens of the area. In addition to volume, traffic speed on 50th Street is a problem. If you have driven 50th Street you know that the problem does not begin at the proposed location of the road improvements, but begins at Wooddale travelling west and well west of the Highway 100 bridge (assuming the traffic light is green) when travelling east. The creation of a separate turn lane into city hall and the Sunnyslope neighborhood provides the likely option that speed will increase as an impediment (left turns blocking one lane) are removed. The lane narrowing solution offered by the city engineer is insufficient to ensure that traffic will be slowed. In summary, the current proposal in its isolated solution to a critical issue and a much larger problem does not solve the core problems and is not the thoughtful and quality work we expect from our elected officials and members of the city staff. Again, thank you for your time and consideration Bruce Gustafson Respondent No:20 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 25, 2021 07:29:09 am Last Seen:Oct 25, 2021 07:29:09 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Steven Dietrich Q2.Address 4816 Woodhill Way Q3.Comment Dear City Council - Thank you for allowing me to speak at the City Council meeting on Tuesday, Oct 19th. My wife and I moved to Edina specifically to have our son attend the Edina School system – we view Edina’s school system as one of the best in the state. However, the use of the TIF District financing puts higher demand on the school system without the higher property tax revenue for the next 30 years. It is my view that the City Council should help enable our School system, not tie their hands behind their back. I’d like to see our School system continue to be the Gold metric and we should not diminish nor compromise our schools. At the Tuesday, Oct 19th Council meeting, the City Council’s view was that the Edina School District would not be “short-changed” because it would continue to receive $33,000 per annum through the life of the TIF (equal to its current portion of the property taxes assessed on the Perkins site), is simplistic at best and intentionally misleading at worst. This view does not take into consideration the corrosive effects of inflation over the life of the proposed TIF. $33,000 today will not buy the same level of service in 2049 that it does today, obviously. The most recent Consumer Price Index annual inflation rate released by the U.S. government was 5.4%. If we assume an inflation rate of 5% for the next 12 months, the $33,000 would need to grow to $34,650 (which is 5% higher than $33,000) to maintain the same level of purchasing power for the School District next year. That $1,650 difference will need to be made up in some other fashion or the Edina School District will not be able to provide the same education for our kids. We can run this thought experiment for the entire 30-year life of the TIF. To do so, we need to make some assumptions about future inflation. The goal of the Federal Reserve is for the U.S. economy to produce an annual inflation rate of 2%. However, the U.S. CPI is not likely to revert from 5.4% to 2% immediately. So let’s assume year 1’s inflation rate is 5%, year 2’s inflation rate is 2.5% and then we use the Fed’s preferred 2% for the next 28 years. The result is that the Edina School District will have lost a cumulative $393,570 in purchasing power over the life of the TIF. Looking at just the final year of the TIF, it would take $60,622 to buy as much as $33,000 today. These assumptions and calculations are consistent with the loss of purchasing power of the dollar observed over the last 30 years – math below. This is how the creation of a TIF district at the Perkins site short-changes the Edina School District and the rest of the community to provide a superb education for our children. To say that it won’t, indicates a lack of elementary understanding about compounding inflation. Please do not diminish nor compromise our school system – please vote no to TIF. Your concerned resident, Steven Lyle Dietrich Year Amount Inflation Future $ Annual Payment Lost Purch Power 1 $33,000.00 5.0% $34,650.00 33,000.00 $1,650.00 2 $34,650.00 2.5% $35,516.25 33,000.00 $2,516.25 3 $35,516.25 2.0% $36,226.58 33,000.00 $3,226.58 4 $36,226.58 2.0% $36,951.11 33,000.00 $3,951.11 5 $36,951.11 2.0% $37,690.13 33,000.00 $4,690.13 6 $37,690.13 2.0% $38,443.93 33,000.00 $5,443.93 7 $38,443.93 2.0% $39,212.81 33,000.00 $6,212.81 8 $39,212.81 2.0% $39,997.07 33,000.00 $6,997.07 9 $39,997.07 2.0% $40,797.01 33,000.00 $7,797.01 10 $40,797.01 2.0% $41,612.95 33,000.00 $8,612.95 11 $41,612.95 2.0% $42,445.21 33,000.00 $9,445.21 1 2 $42,445.21 2.0% $43,294.11 33,000.00 $10,294.11 1 3 $43,294.11 2.0% $44,159.99 33,000.00 $11,159.99 14 $44,159.99 2.0% $45,043.19 33,000.00 $12,043.19 15 $45,043.19 2.0% $45,944.06 33,000.00 $12,944.06 16 $45,944.06 2.0% $46,862.94 33,000.00 $13,862.94 17 $46,862.94 2.0% $47,800.20 33,000.00 $14,800.20 18 $47,800.20 2.0% $48,756.20 33,000.00 $15,756.20 19 $48,756.20 2.0% $49,731.32 33,000.00 $16,731.32 2 0 $49,731.32 2.0% $50,725.95 33,000.00 $17,725.95 2 1 $50,725.95 2.0% $51,740.47 33,000.00 $18,740.47 22 $51,740.47 2.0% $52,775.28 33,000.00 $19,775.28 23 $52,775.28 2.0% $53,830.78 33,000.00 $20,830.78 24 $53,830.78 2.0% $54,907.40 33,000.00 $21,907.40 2 5 $54,907.40 2.0% $56,005.55 33,000.00 $23,005.55 2 6 $56,005.55 2.0% $57,125.66 33,000.00 $24,125.66 27 $57,125.66 2.0% $58,268.17 33,000.00 $25,268.17 28 $58,268.17 2.0% $59,433.54 33,000.00 $26,433.54 2 9 $59,433.54 2.0 % $60,622.21 33,000.00 $27,622.21 S U M $393,570.05 Cumulative Lost Purchasing Power to the Edina School District Respondent No:21 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 25, 2021 07:49:48 am Last Seen:Oct 25, 2021 07:49:48 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Michael Bronkala Q2.Address 4801 West. Sunnyslope Rd Q3.Comment I am completely against any use of public tax dollars to fund this development. At the end of the day. This is tax payer money! The use of these dollars has to have the public good first and foremost in mind. These funds are first to improve blighted areas. The Perkins site is surely not a blighted parcel of land. To the contrary, it is provably one of the most desirable parcels of land in the state. At the last council meeting several citizens got up to talk about school funding and how this TIF will effect school funding.(It will) The Mayor and others proceeded to talk down to us in a condescending and patronizing way as if we did not know what we were talking about. The schools will lose out. They may be locked in at the 33,000.00 per year but the loss of purchasing power from inflation will eat away at this over the course of the 30 year term. (I thought TIF is to be used for the public good?) Bill N made his presentation that the schools would not be affected. This is not true in fact they have already been affected by the way the property has been evaluated. Another criteria needed for TIF is that the development of this parcel of land would not be done unless TIF funding is used. If this property was put on the market I am sure a lot of developers would be interested. I have talked to developers, they did not know the property was even up for sale. Council Members Pierce and Staunton has a stipulation on the approval to rezone this property to put together a comprehensive plan to address and fix the safety and traffic problems that exist on 50th ave S. The proposal that the city engineer put forward will not fix the problem. This fix needs to begin where the problem starts and that is at Wooddale. Nothing short of this will not fix the problem. If the plan does not fix the problem long term why do it at all. The TIF funding is for the public good I see no public good in this. (5% of the public that I have talked to (that includes the Golf Terrace area Country Club Sunnyslope area , the entire membership at Edina Country Club, all who are directly affected by this development want this development to go through.. Council members listen to your constituents and vote to reject this TIF funding. For the sake of our neighborhood and our kids. Respondent No:22 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 25, 2021 08:53:29 am Last Seen:Oct 25, 2021 08:53:29 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Margaret Green Q2.Address 4904 E. Sunnyslope Q3.Comment The proposed changes to 50th and Dale Dr are concerning. Removing the ability to turn left does NOT help the residents of Sunnyslope nor does it increase safety. It will make it more difficult to exit our neighborhood and force more traffic out of the east Sunnyslope entrance which is more dangerous for those left turns out of our neighborhood. The city should find an option that makes it easier to turn left from Dale Drive onto eastbound 50th. Also, the changes to the sidewalk on 50th is not sufficient to ensure safe walking and biking. The sidewalk on 50th is always covered in grass/leaves/snow/ice and it is very dangerous for anyone walking or biking. We need more dedicated space for biking and a physical barrier from the traffic that races up 50th. Along with the current TIF/Perkins plan, the city should create a plan for the stretch of sidewalk on 50th between the Sunnyslope neighborhood and Wooddale Ave. Last, the traffic study was done during the pandemic when traffic in and out of Sunnyslope was at an all time low. We would like city representatives to take another look at the these issues. It should be a priority to make it easier to exit going Eastbound on Dale and make the sidewalks on 50th safe for bikers and pedestrians. Respondent No:23 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 25, 2021 09:13:11 am Last Seen:Oct 25, 2021 09:13:11 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Mark Christensen Q2.Address 4619 Casco Ave Q3.Comment I can't believe the city is considering a 7 story apartment building at Eden Ave. and Wilson. I would understand a modest mixed commercial/residential type project of some kind but not this behemoth. Kinda seems like a bait and switch operation. We have added enough to this end of Edina. We don't need the extra people or traffic. Respondent No:24 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 25, 2021 09:26:05 am Last Seen:Oct 25, 2021 09:26:05 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Lucy Esberg Q2.Address 4808 Woodhill Way, Edina, MN 55424 Q3.Comment To Whom It May Concern: My husband and I are writing in response to the proposed traffic safety mitigation issues on 50th street next to town hall and our Sunnyslope Neighborhood The initial proposal is to stop our neighborhood from exiting left off Dale Drive onto 50th —- and to place a turn lane in the center of 50th effectively creating narrow lanes. This would not make *exiting* our neighborhood safer and certainly does not make the sidewalks safer (especially with only 1 foot grace between the road and curb). This proposal would not reduce the speeds on 50th. If anything, it will create more obstruction of view as we attempt to enter and exit the neighborhood. We propose a round about or stop light at E Sunnyslope. Thank you for your time Lucy Esberg and Matt Simondet Respondent No:25 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 25, 2021 09:34:41 am Last Seen:Oct 25, 2021 09:34:41 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Cyndi Olson Q2.Address 4808 W Sunnyslope Rd Q3.Comment All council members should see all the comments in NextDoor app about this subject -- https://nextdoor.com/p/szryxfgC_6Tw?utm_source=share&extras=MjYwNTYy Respondent No:26 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 25, 2021 09:53:16 am Last Seen:Oct 25, 2021 09:53:16 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Paul Porter Q2.Address 4928 Dale Drive Q3.Comment Please step back and take a look at this “Perkins redevelopment” project and note that the whole process is less than transparent. There seem to be uncomfortably close relationship between the Mayor, the landowner, the developer and some city staff. The city wants flexibility for a proposed northbound Hwy100 off-ramp, so they asked the developer to not use of portion of the land for the proposed apartment complex. The developer said because of this they need a variance to allow for a 7-story structure for the project to be financially viable. The city granted this variance. The developer knows the hoops to jump through to quality for TIF financing: a minimal number of affordable housing units (by Edina standards) and a “public space”. In return the city gets to use some TIF funds for some infrastructure improvements. According to the recently released Grandview East Area Transportation Study some of those funds are planned for Eden Ave Corridor Improvements (p.17), but the W 50th Street alternatives are currently not planned for reconstruction (p.25), yet local residents know there exists today traffic and pedestrian problems on 50th. The Transportation Study highlights financially viable, new alternative intersections for Hwy100 (p. 36, 38 & 40) that wouldn’t require the city to go to the developer asking the developer to not use a portion of the land for the proposed apartment complex. Hence, it appears there was no need to grant the height variance for the proposed project. One last item: why was there no consideration in the Transportation Study given to a sidewalk connecting Eden Avenue to 50th Street on the east side of Grange Rd? Prior to completion of the proposed apartment complex there should be sidewalk accessibility to the bus stops on 50th Street. A sidewalk on the west side of Grange Rd exposes pedestrians to multiple intersections where traffic is entering and exiting Hwy100. Respondent No:27 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Oct 25, 2021 09:56:29 am Last Seen:Oct 25, 2021 09:56:29 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Katy LeBarron Q2.Address 4928 DALE DRIVE Q3.Comment I'm a little disheartened that the historic buildings are being used as the substandard justification for TIF and that the 'affordable housing' really isn't affordable to people who really need affordable housing! From what I understand, the only way to address the current LOS D/F rating of the surrounding roads (before adding 190+ apartment traffic) is to use TIF money otherwise our neighborhood traffic safety will not be addressed for 5+ years. If you vote to benefit this neighborhood so it can address traffic with remedial measures, the school system loses out long term on tax dollars. What we have continually asked for is a long term comprehensive plan to address issues but I don't think we've received a clear satisfactory answer. Perhaps it interferes with the long term development plan. Respondent No:28 Login:cmclemency Email:katie.clemency@gmail.com Responded At:Oct 25, 2021 14:18:56 pm Last Seen:Oct 25, 2021 21:01:36 pm IP Address:68.46.65.132 Q1.First and Last Name Catherine M Clemency Q2.Address 4604 Oak Dr Q3.Comment The development of luxury apartments seems to be an inappropriate use of TIF financing. Either the developer has the resources or not. There is no community good to the city funding the developer's shortfall, especially as most of the nearby community have opposed this project given the harm it would cause to the adjacent neighborhoods. This seems like a not so "vieled" attempt to begin funding to create the Grandview Lid Morever, the proposed solutions to traffic congestion are inadequate to the existing situation and will be even more so if the apartment complex is built. The roadways are insufficient in size and shrinking them to add needed pedestrian walkways will only add to congestion and slowing of traffic through the area - especially in early morning and late afternoon peak hours. And I can't even imagine the nightmare of construction and road closures while this project is developed. As city officials, you are once again failing to listen to the residents. CITY OF EDINA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA Councilmember ______________________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 2021-99 ESTABLISHING THE EDEN WILLSON REDEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The Board of Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA") have heretofore established the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area (the "Project Area") and adopted a Redevelopment Plan therefore. It has been proposed by the HRA and the City that the City approve and the HRA adopt a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area (the "Redevelopment Plan Modification") and a Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF Plan") for the establishment of the Eden Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District (the "TIF District") therein (the Redevelopment Plan Modification and the TIF Plan are referred to collectively herein as the "Plans"); all pursuant to and in conformity with applicable law, including Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 and Sections 469.174 to 469.1794, all inclusive, as amended, (the "Act") all as reflected in the Plans, and presented for the Council's consideration. 1.02. The HRA and City have investigated the facts relating to the Plans and have caused the Plans to be prepared. 1.03. The HRA and City will have performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the establishment of the TIF District and the adoption and approval of the proposed Plans, including, but not limited to, notification of Hennepin County and Independent School District No. 273 having taxing jurisdiction over the property within the TIF District, a review of and written comment on the Plans by the City Planning Commission, approval of the Plans by the HRA on October 14, 2021, and the holding of a public hearing upon published notice as required by law. 1.04. Certain written reports (the ''Reports") relating to the Plans and to the activities contemplated therein have heretofore been prepared by staff and consultants and submitted to the Council and/or made a part of the City files and proceedings on the Plans. The Reports include data, information and/or substantiation constituting or relating to the basis for the other findings and determinations made in this resolution. The Council hereby confirms, ratifies and adopts the Reports, which are hereby incorporated into and made as fully a part of this resolution to the same extent as if set forth in full herein. 1.05. The City is not modifying the boundaries of the Project Area, but is, however, modifying the Redevelopment Plan to include activities related to the TIF District. Resolution 2021-99 Page 2 Section 2. Findings for the Adoption and Approval of the Redevelopment Plan Modification. 2.01. The Council approves the Redevelopment Plan Modification, and specifically finds that: (a) the land within the Project Area would not be available for redevelopment without the financial aid to be sought under this Redevelopment Plan; (b) the Redevelopment Plan, as modified, will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Project Area by private enterprise; and (c) that the Redevelopment Plan, as modified, conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. Section 3. Findings for the Establishment of the TIF District. 3.01. The Council hereby finds that the TIF District is in the public interest and is a "redevelopment district" under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. 10 of the Act. 3.02. The Council further finds that the proposed redevelopment would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the TIF District permitted by the TIF Plan. 3.03. The Council finds that the TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the City as a whole; and that the TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the redevelopment or development of the TIF District by private enterprise. 3.04. The Council further finds, declares and determines that the City made the above findings stated in this Section and has set forth the reasons and supporting facts for each determination in writing, attached hereto as Exhibit A. 3.05. The HRA elects to calculate fiscal disparities for the TIF District in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subd. 3, clause b, which means the fiscal disparities contribution would be taken from inside the TIF District. Section 4. Public Purpose. 4.01. The adoption of the Plans conforms in all respects to the requirements of the Act and will help fulfill a need to develop an area of the City which is already built up, to provide housing and employment opportunities, to improve the tax base and to improve the general economy of the State and thereby serves a public purpose. For the reasons described in Exhibit A, the City believes these benefits directly derive from the tax increment assistance provided under the TIF Plan. A private developer will receive only the assistance needed to make the development financially feasible. As such, any private benefits received by a property owner are incidental and do not outweigh the primary public benefits. Section 5. Approval and Adoption of the Plans. 5.01. The Plans, as presented to the Council on this date, including without limitation the findings and statements of objectives contained therein, are hereby approved, ratified, established, and adopted and shall be placed on file in the office of the HRA Executive Director. Resolution 2021-99 Page 3 5.02. The staff of the City, the City's advisors and legal counsel are authorized and directed to proceed with the implementation of the Plans and to negotiate, draft, prepare and present to this Council for its consideration all further plans, resolutions, documents and contracts necessary for this purpose. 5.03 The Auditor of Hennepin County is requested to certify the original net tax capacity of the TIF District, as described in the Plans, and to certify in each year thereafter the amount by which the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased; and the HRA is authorized and directed to forthwith transmit this request to the County Auditor in such form and content as the Auditor may specify, together with a list of all properties within the TIF District, for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding the adoption of this resolution. 5.04. The HRA Executive Director is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the Plans with the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Revenue and the Office of the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.175, Subd. 4a. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council member ______________________, and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: _________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ and the following voted against the same: _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ Dated: November 3, 2021 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor (Seal) Resolution 2021-99 Page 4 EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 2021-99 The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Eden Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District, as required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 are as follows: 1. Finding that the Eden Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District is a redevelopment district as defined in M.S., Section 469.174, Subdivision 10. The District consists of two (2) parcels within the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and their internal and external rights-of-way, abutting roadways and intersections, pedestrian pathways and crossings, all with plans to redevelop the area for redevelopment and construction of a mixed-use apartment and retail building. Parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area of the District are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures and more than 50 percent of the buildings in the District, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance. (See Appendix D of the TIF Plan.) 2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the TIF Plan. The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future: This finding is supported by the fact that the activities proposed in the TIF Plan meets the City's objectives for redevelopment. The existing property contains substandard buildings whose renovation requires high costs related to demolition, remediation and reconstruction of infrastructure. The redevelopment also requires substantial investment toward public improvements such as local transportation and utility infrastructure and shared public parking. The combination of limited amounts of property available for expansion adjacent to the existing redevelopment site, height/density limitations, and the public and private cost of financing the proposed improvements which are essential to the comprehensive redevelopment of the area, this project is feasible only through assistance, in part, from tax increment financing. The developer provided a proforma outlining project sources and uses as well as projected rent, vacancy and financing assumptions. City staff and the City’s financial advisor reviewed the information and have determined that the project is not feasible without assistance due to anticipated rent levels and market returns not supporting the redevelopment costs for this site. The term of assistance for the redevelopment project is expected to be less than the maximum 26-year term of a redevelopment district. The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the TIF Plan: This finding is justified on the grounds that the development intensity and tax base created on currently underutilized and declining property requires site and public improvement costs that are improbable without public assistance. Specifically, the cost of site preparation, Resolution 2021-99 Page 5 demolition, remediation, and public improvements to include transportation and utility infrastructure will add significantly to the total redevelopment cost of any development in this area. Site and public improvements costs necessary to sustain the approved density have made redevelopment infeasible without tax increment assistance. The City reasonably determines that no other redevelopment of similar scope is anticipated on this site without substantially similar assistance being provided to the development. Therefore, the City concludes as follows: a. The City's estimate of the amount by which the market value of the entire District will increase without the use of tax increment financing is $0. b. If the proposed development occurs, the total estimated increase in taxable market value will be $51,721,500. c. The present value of tax increments from the District for the maximum duration of the district permitted by the TIF Plan is estimated to be $12,043,964. d. Even if some development other than the proposed development were to occur, the Council finds that no alternative would occur that would produce a taxable market value increase greater than $39,677,536 (the amount in clause b less the amount in clause c) without tax increment assistance. 3. Finding that the TIF Plan for the Eden Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole. The Planning Commission reviewed the TIF Plan on October 13, 2021 and approved Resolution PC-B-21-31 to provide written opinion affirming that the TIF Plan conforms to the general development plan of the City. 4. Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Eden Willson Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area by private enterprise. Through the implementation of the TIF Plan, the City will provide an impetus for the construction of a new mixed-use private development which will result in increased employment in the City and the State of Minnesota, the renovation of substandard properties, increased tax base of the State and add a high-quality development to the City. Resolution 2021-99 Page 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of November 3, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of________________________, 2021. _______________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk The CITY ofEDINA Establishing the Eden / Willson Tax Increment Financing District Edina City Council Public Hearing October 19, 2021 November 3, 2021 www.EdinaMN.gov The CITY ofEDINA 2Photo Source: Minnesota Historic Society 1957 aerial photo -Normandale Road -At grade intersections -Cement factory -Halla Nursery -Old Village Hall Background Biltmore Cement Factory Halla Cedrics Village Hall Bowling The CITY ofEDINA 5 4917 Eden Avenue -Restaurant, office and conference facilities -Land has higher value than building -Building deemed “sub-standard” per TIF statute Background –existing conditions 4918 Eden Avenue -Two historic buildings Grange Hall & Cahill School -Relocated to this site in 30s and 70s -Buildings deemed “sub-standard” per TIF statutes4918 4917 Roadway Network -High peak-hour traffic volume -Lack complete sidewalks -Limited bicycle routes The CITY ofEDINA 7Photo Source: Minnesota Historic Society Summary of Proposal –westerly view Final rezoning approval pending The CITY ofEDINA 9Photo Source: Minnesota Historic Society Summary of Proposal –roadway concept Final preliMinarY deSign approval pending The CITY ofEDINA 10Photo Source: Minnesota Historic Society Summary of Proposal –financial gap gap The developer requested $5.1 million in TIF support over 15-years to make the project viable. This request has been analyzed and evaluated. The budget gap has been confirmed. Term Sheet was prepared August 26, 2021. Full TIF Redevelopment Agreement anticipated to be considered November 3, 2021. The CITY ofEDINA 11 What is TIF? Availability of Property Taxes to Taxing Agencies “Incremental Taxes” Remain in TIF District Original + Market Value Taxes Available to All Original + Incremental Taxes Available to All Year 1 Year 26 Year 40+ •Economic development financing tool •Governed by Minnesota Statute •Enabled by City Council •“Tax Increment” Financing -uses growth in property tax base to fund private investment and public infrastructure Year 3 $54.8 M $3.0 M The CITY ofEDINA 14 Edina has used TIF financing since the 1970s and currently has 9 active TIF Districts: •4040 W. 70th •44th & France 2 •50th & France 2 •66 West •76th Street •Amundson •Grandview 2 •Pentagon Park •Southdale 2 TIF in Edina ProposedEden WillsonTIF District The CITY ofEDINA TIF in Edina is used on a limited basis and to a lesser extent than neighboring cities TIF in Edina 5.0% in 2021 15 The CITY ofEDINA •2 parcels & adjacent roadways •“Redevelopment” District •25 year term •Original Tax Capacity = $60,842 •Projected Tax Capacity = $691,772 -Used to establish maximum budget 16 Proposed TIF Plan The CITY ofEDINA $22.7 million -Incremental Property Tax Estimate •Over 26 years term •Includes interest earnings •Excludes base taxes to County, School, and City 17 Projected Uses of Tax Increment Funds •Acquisition $3.0 M (11%) •Site improvements $750k •Utilities $1.5 M •Affordable Housing $2.06 M (9%) •Other Improvements $5.55 M (24%) •Administrative $2.06 M (9%) •Interest $7.8 M (34%) •Total $22.7 Million Pages 8-9 of TIF Plan Proposed TIF Plan –Sources and Uses The CITY ofEDINA In Conclusion: it is not reasonably expected that the proposed redevelopment with long-term affordable housing and public improvements will be constructed without the use of Tax Increment Financing. •Site qualifies as a Redevelopment TIF District •Plans complies with the City’s general plans for redevelopment (Comp. Plan) •High development costs and restricted rental income creates a financial gap that that hinders the delivery of the proposal 18 Proposed TIF Plan –Findings gap The CITY ofEDINA 19 Questions / Discussion Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:Approve Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Agreement for 4917 Eden Avenue Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the Redevelopment Agreement to provide Tax Increment Financing for the redevelopment of property located at 4917 Eden Avenue. INTRODUCTION: This item pertains to the use of public financing to partially fund private redevelopment at 4917 Eden Avenue. Special counsel at Dorsey and Whitney have prepared a complete Redevelopment Agreement based on the Term Sheet that was presented to the Edina HRA in August 2021. Staff recommends that this Redevelopment Agreement be approved. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report TIF Redevelopment Agreement Staff Presentation Staff Presentation 1 November 3, 2021 Mayor Hovland and City Council Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Approve Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Agreement for 4917 Eden Avenue Information / Background: Reuter Walton Development has requested that Tax Increment Financing (TIF) be provided for the proposed redevelopment of commercial property at 4917 Eden Avenue. The redevelopment proposal would transform the aging commercial site into a modern mixed-use site that includes both market-rate and affordable apartments as well as new commercial space. The developer secured preliminary rezoning approvals for the site and scheduled for final zoning approvals on November 3, 2021. The total development cost for the 2.08-acre site has risen to $85.0 million. Ehlers has scrutinized the financial pro forma and determined that the financial gap is approximately $5.1 million. Ehlers also confirmed that “but for” the use of TIF, this project will be unable to secure private financing. Hennepin County and Edina Public Schools have been notified that the City and HRA are considering the use of TIF in this area. A public hearing was conducted on the potential TIF District on October 19th. Final consideration of the new TIF District is scheduled for November 3, 2021. The Edina HRA considered the proposed Redevelopment Agreement on October 28, 2021. Summary A complete Redevelopment Agreement has been prepared based on the Term Sheet that was presented to the HRA on August 26, 2021. The Redevelopment Agreement has been prepared by the HRA’s special counsel Dorsey & Whitney with input from Ehlers Associates. The developer – Reuter Walton – is agreeable to the terms, conditions and limitations contained in the Agreement. Housing and Redevelopment Authority Established 1974 STAFF REPORT Page 2 Additionally, the terms of the Agreement are based on the anticipated need for funding for several public improvements to the roadway network that surround the site and connect to the surrounding neighborhoods. The scope of these roadway improvements is anticipated to include improvements to Eden, Willson, Grange and W. 50th Street. The specific timing, design and cost of those public improvements will be determined in the future. Without the revenue generated from the redevelopment of 4917 Eden Ave, this scope of public improvements is not expected to occur for many years. Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the Redevelopment Agreement be approved. # # # Execution Draft Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT by and among CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, and EDEN AVENUE GROUP, LLC Dated as of November 3, 2021 THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Dorsey & Whitney LLP 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 Execution Draft -i- Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Article I Recitals; Exhibits, Definitions ..................................................................................................... 3  1.1 Recitals ......................................................................................................................... 3  1.2 Exhibits ......................................................................................................................... 3  1.3 Definitions .................................................................................................................... 3  Article II Representations and Warranties .............................................................................................. 7  2.1 Representations and Warranties of the City ................................................................. 7  2.2 Representations and Warranties of the Authority ........................................................ 7  2.3 Representations and Warranties of Developer ............................................................. 8  Article III TIF Assistance ........................................................................................................................... 9  3.1 Creation of TIF District; Certification .......................................................................... 9  3.2 Qualified Redevelopment Costs ................................................................................... 9  3.3 TIF Note ..................................................................................................................... 10  3.4 TIF Assistance and Potential Adjustment .................................................................. 12  3.5 Assignment of Note .................................................................................................... 14  3.6 Action to Reduce Taxes ............................................................................................. 15  3.7 Reservation of Tax Increments; Additional Public Benefits ...................................... 16  Article IV Project Requirements ............................................................................................................. 16  4.1 Commencement and Completion of Project............................................................... 16  4.2 Zoning and Land Use Approvals ................................................................................ 17  4.3 Building and Construction Permits ............................................................................ 17  4.4 Restrictions on Development ..................................................................................... 17  4.5 Submission and Approval of Evidence of Financing and Land Acquisition.............. 17  4.6 Affordable Housing .................................................................................................... 18  4.7 Public Easements ........................................................................................................ 19  4.8 Streetscape Elements and Public Art .......................................................................... 21  4.9 Coordination with Future City Infrastructure Improvements ..................................... 21  4.10 Equity and Inclusion ................................................................................................... 21  4.11 Effect of Delay ........................................................................................................... 24  4.12 Additional Responsibilities of Developer. ................................................................. 24  4.13 Certificate of Completion ........................................................................................... 25  Article V Encumbrance of the Project Area .......................................................................................... 25  5.1 Mortgage of the Project Area ..................................................................................... 25  5.2 Copy of Notice of Default to Mortgagee .................................................................... 25  5.3 Mortgagee’s Option to Cure Events of Default .......................................................... 26  5.4 Rights of a Foreclosing Mortgagee ............................................................................ 26  5.5 Events of Default Under Mortgage ............................................................................ 26  5.6 Subordination of Agreement ...................................................................................... 27  Execution Draft -ii- Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 Article VI Insurance and Indemnification .............................................................................................. 27  6.1 Insurance .................................................................................................................... 27  6.2 Indemnification .......................................................................................................... 28  Article VII Other Developer Covenants ................................................................................................. 28  7.1 Developer Reimbursement Obligations ..................................................................... 28  7.2 Maintenance and Operation of the Improvements ..................................................... 28  7.3 Cooperation with Litigation ....................................................................................... 29  7.4 Condemnation, Damage, or Destruction .................................................................... 29  7.5 Business Subsidy Agreement ..................................................................................... 29  7.6 Developer/Authority Grant Applications ................................................................... 29  7.7 Project Information .................................................................................................... 30  Article VIII Transfer Limitations ........................................................................................................... 30  8.1 Representation as to the Minimum Improvements ..................................................... 30  8.2 Limitation on Transfers .............................................................................................. 30  Article IX Events of Default and Remedies ............................................................................................ 31  9.1 Events of Default Defined .......................................................................................... 31  9.2 Developer Events of Default ...................................................................................... 31  9.3 City and Authority Events of Default ......................................................................... 32  9.4 Cure Rights ................................................................................................................. 32  9.5 Authority Remedies on Developer Events of Default ................................................ 32  9.6 City Remedies on Developer Events of Default ......................................................... 33  9.7 Developer Remedies on City or Authority Events of Default .................................... 33  9.8 No Remedy Exclusive ................................................................................................ 33  9.9 No Additional Waiver Implied by One Waiver ......................................................... 33  9.10 Reimbursement of Attorneys’ Fees ............................................................................ 33  Article X Additional Provisions ............................................................................................................... 34  10.1 Conflicts of Interest .................................................................................................... 34  10.2 Titles of Articles and Sections .................................................................................... 34  10.3 Notices and Demands ................................................................................................. 34  10.4 Governing Law, Jurisdiction, Venue and Waiver of Trial by Jury ............................ 35  10.5 Severability ................................................................................................................. 35  10.6 Consents and Approvals ............................................................................................. 35  10.7 Additional Documents ................................................................................................ 35  10.8 Limitation ................................................................................................................... 35  10.9 City/Authority Approval ............................................................................................ 35  10.10 Superseding Effect ..................................................................................................... 35  10.11 Relationship of Parties................................................................................................ 35  10.12 Survival of Terms ....................................................................................................... 36  10.13 Data Practices Act ...................................................................................................... 36  10.14 No Waiver of Governmental Immunity and Limitations on Liability ........................ 36  10.15 City and Authority Regulatory Authority................................................................... 36  10.16 Memorandum of Agreement ...................................................................................... 36  Execution Draft -iii- Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 10.17 Limited Liability ........................................................................................................ 36  10.18 Time is of the Essence ................................................................................................ 36  10.19 Counterparts ............................................................................................................... 36  10.20 Amendments ............................................................................................................... 37  10.21 Term ........................................................................................................................... 37  Execution Draft -iv- Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A Legal Description of the Project Area Exhibit B Project Plans Exhibit C TIF Pro Forma Exhibit D Form of Go-Ahead Letter Exhibit E Form of Certificate of Completion with Completion Checklist Exhibit F Memorandum of Redevelopment Agreement Exhibit G Form of TIF Note Exhibit H Sample IRR Calculations and Project TIF Adjustment Calculation Exhibit I Concept Plan for Future City Transportation Infrastructure Project Exhibit J Inclusionary Housing Policy Program Guide Exhibit K Form of Affordable Housing Restrictive Covenant Exhibit L Form of Right of First Purchase Option Agreement Exhibit M Form of Parking Easement Agreement Exhibit N Intentionally omitted. Exhibit O Form of Future Land Agreement Exhibit P Equity and Inclusion Outreach Plan Exhibit Q Form of Equity and Inclusion Report Execution Draft 1 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (4917 Eden Avenue) THIS REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into November 3, 2021 (“Effective Date”), by and among the City of Edina, Minnesota, a Minnesota statutory city (the “City”), the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”), and Eden Avenue Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Developer”). RECITALS A. Pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.1799, as amended (the “TIF Act”), the Authority is authorized to finance certain eligible redevelopment costs of redevelopment projects with tax increment revenues derived from a tax increment financing district established in accordance with the TIF Act. B. The City and the Authority previously established the “Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area” pursuant to Sections 469.001 through 469.047, inclusive, of the TIF Act, in an effort to encourage the development and redevelopment of such designated area within the City (the “Redevelopment Area”). C. Developer is under contract to purchase from Eden Ventures, LLC, the current owner, that certain land within the Redevelopment Area located at 4917 Eden Avenue, as such land is legally described on the attached Exhibit A (the “Project Area”). D. In accordance with the City Approvals (defined herein), Developer has proposed to redevelop and improve the Project Area with a project consisting of: (i) a seven-story building with approximately 176 market rate apartment units, at least 20 affordable rental apartment units, and an approximately 3,400 square-foot restaurant; (ii) approximately 277 below grade parking stalls to serve the private components of the proposed project; (iii) at least 29 at-grade, public parking stalls for public, district parking (collectively, the “Public Parking”), in the area generally depicted on the Project Plans attached as Exhibit B, which Public Parking will be subject to the Parking Easement (as defined herein); (iv) the sidewalk and streetscape improvements and amenities (the “Sidewalks and Streetscapes”) along Eden Avenue and Willson Road adjoining the Minimum Improvements, as required under the terms of the City Approvals and in the areas generally depicted on the Project Plans attached as Exhibit B, which Sidewalks and Streetscapes will be subject to the Public Access Easement (as defined herein); and (v) inclusion of parcel to be used for future roadway project or other public use; and (vi) such other improvements required under the terms of the City Approvals; Execution Draft 2 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 the foregoing items described in clauses (i) through (vi), all to be constructed at the general scale and massing using the architectural quality, exterior finish materials and landscaping as shown in the Project Plans attached as Exhibit B and the City Approvals, are collectively referred to herein as the “Minimum Improvements”). E. Upon completion, this project is anticipated to deliver many benefits to the general public. In addition to the redevelopment of an underutilized building and long-term increase in the property tax base, this project will deliver additional public benefits including: creation of new affordable housing units, stormwater improvements, environmental remediation, streetscape improvements, public parking, and dedication of land for future roadway. Upon completion, this project will also enable several improvements to the local transportation network including improvements for pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists. These improvements are intended to benefit this project, the surrounding neighborhoods and the general public who travel to and through this area. F. The Authority has analyzed the current use of the Project Area in accordance with the TIF Act, including a building-by-building structural analysis, and determined that the Project Area is currently underutilized, with obsolete structures and physical arrangements, substantial vacant areas, and potential contamination, with outdated and inadequate public infrastructure and circulation. G. Having analyzed the current land use in the Project Area, consistent with the TIF Act, the Authority and the City held public hearings after appropriate notices to consider the need and desirability for adoption of a tax increment financing plan and the creation and establishment of the Project Area and certain other adjoining land as a tax increment financing district pursuant to the TIF Act, and determined that absent such authorization and the provision of certain funds to undertake various qualified redevelopment activities, the redevelopment contemplated herein would not be undertaken. H. After such hearings, the Authority and the City, having determined that the creation and establishment of a tax increment financing district in the Project Area and such other adjoining land is in the public interest, the Authority and the City established the Eden / Willson Tax Increment Financing District (a redevelopment district) (the “TIF District”) under the TIF Act and adopted the Tax Increment Financing plan (the “TIF Plan”) for the TIF District in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, pursuant to Authority Resolution No. 2021-12. I. The Authority and the City have adopted findings which include a determination that (i) the redevelopment to occur through the proposed Minimum Improvements would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the Project Area that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of the tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the Minimum Improvement’s tax increments for the 26-year duration of the TIF District, (ii) that the proposed Minimum Improvements conform to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the City as a whole, and (iii) that the proposed Minimum Improvements afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the TIF District by private enterprise. J. Upon certification of the TIF District and the satisfaction of certain conditions set forth in this Agreement, the Authority will provide Developer certain TIF Assistance (as defined herein) in accordance with Article III of this Agreement in connection with Developer’s development and construction of the Minimum Improvements. Execution Draft 3 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of foregoing Recitals, which are incorporated into the provisions of this Agreement by this reference, and the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the others as follows: Article I Recitals; Exhibits, Definitions 1.1 Recitals. The foregoing Recitals are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference, including the definitions set forth therein. 1.2 Exhibits. All Exhibits referred to in and attached to this Agreement upon execution are incorporated in and form a part of this Agreement as if fully set forth herein. 1.3 Definitions. Unless the context otherwise specifies or requires, the following terms have the following definitions. Certain other capitalized terms are defined elsewhere in this Agreement. All defined terms may be used in the singular or the plural, as the context requires. “Affordable Housing Requirements” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.6(a). “Affordable Housing Restrictive Covenant” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.6(d). “Affordable Units” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.6(e). “Agreement” means this Redevelopment Agreement, as the same may be from time to time modified, amended or supplemented. “Authority” means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota. “Authorized Representative” means, with respect to the Authority, the Executive Director of the Authority or its designee, and, with respect to the City, the City Manager or its designee. “Available Tax Increments” means up to 70% of the Tax Increments received and retained by the Authority from the County during any applicable time frame. “Board” means the Board of Commissioners of the Authority. “Certificate of Completion” means a certificate in substantially the form attached as Exhibit E, signed by the Authorized Representative for the Authority, to be issued pursuant to the terms of Section 4.13. “City” means the City of Edina, Minnesota. “City Approvals” means, collectively, the PUD Ordinance, the Project Approval Resolution, the Final Development Plan, and the Development Contract, and all other approvals, permits, licenses, and agreements issued by or entered into with the City, the Authority, or other governmental authority relating to the Project Area and Developer’s improvement thereof. “City Consultants” means the financial, engineering, legal, TIF eligibility and other similar advisors to the City and the Authority. “City Council” means the City Council of the City. Execution Draft 4 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 “City Parties” means the City and the Authority, and their respective governing body members and elected officials, officers, employees, agents, independent contractors and attorneys. “City Easement(s)” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.7(a). “Commencement” means (i) with respect to pre-construction activities necessary for Commencement of the vertical construction of the Minimum Improvements (e.g., demolition, environmental remediation and site preparation), actual physical activity related to such pre-construction activity and (ii) with respect to vertical construction of the Minimum Improvements, the date on which actual physical construction of the building foundation begins. “Completion” means (i) with respect to the Minimum Improvement, Developer’s receipt of the Certificate of Completion from the Authority and (ii) with respect to the individual aspects of the Minimum Improvements described in the Minimum Improvements timeline set forth in Section 4.1, substantial completion of such aspect or element such that Developer can proceed with Commencement of the next aspect or element in a manner consistent with normal construction practices “County” means the County of Hennepin, Minnesota. “Cure Rights” means the rights to cure a Default as specified in Section 9.4 before such Default is deemed to be an Event of Default. “Default” means an act or omission by the City, the Authority or Developer which becomes an Event of Default under this Agreement if it is not cured following notice thereof from the other party pursuant to any applicable Cure Rights. “Default Date” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.1(a). “Developer” means Eden Avenue Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. “Development Contract” means that certain Site Improvement Performance Agreement dated on or about the date hereof entered into by and between the City and Developer, and recorded against the Project Area. “Effective Date” means the date first set forth above. “Environmental Law” means any federal, state or local law, rule, regulation, ordinance, or other legal requirement relating to (a) a release or threatened release of any Hazardous Material, (b) pollution or protection of public health or the environment or (c) the manufacture, handling, transport, use, treatment, storage, or disposal of any Hazardous Material. “Event of Default” means any of the events by the City, the Authority or Developer described in Article IX. “Final Development Plan” means the final development plans for the Minimum Improvements and Project Area as approved by the City pursuant to the Project Approval Resolution and the PUD Ordinance. “Financing Commitments” means financing commitments, binding term sheets and/or other evidence of Project financing commitments from debt and equity sources sufficient, with all other available sources of funding, to fund all costs to construct the Minimum Improvements, all in a form reasonably satisfactory to the Authority and disclosing (i) the identity of the mortgage lender(s), (ii) mortgage rate and Execution Draft 5 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 terms, and (iii) an organizational chart of Developer with the identity of all equity sources with greater than a 10% direct or indirect investment in the Project, and the identity of all individuals and entities with direct or indirect management control of Developer. “Future City Land” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.7(a)(iii). “Future City Transportation Infrastructure Project” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.7. “Future Land Easement” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.7(a)(iii). “Go-Ahead Letter” means Developer’s letter to the City and the Authority, substantially in the form attached as Exhibit D, and including the Financing Commitments and stating that Developer is prepared to (or has) closed on the acquisition of the Project Area and the Project financing, and is prepared to proceed with the construction of the Minimum Improvements. “Hazardous Material” means petroleum, asbestos-containing materials, and any substance, waste, pollutant, contaminant or material that is defined as hazardous or toxic in any Environmental Law. “Law” means federal, state, or local governmental or quasi-governmental laws, ordinances, rules, codes, regulations, directives, orders and/or requirements. “Market Return Rate” Section 3.4(c) “Memorandum of Agreement” means the document described in Section 10.16 and substantially in the form shown in Exhibit F. “Minimum Improvements” has the meaning set forth in Recital D. “Mortgage” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.1(a). “Parking Easement” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.7(a)(i). “Project” means the construction and development of the Minimum Improvements on the Project Area in accordance with the City Approvals and this Agreement. “Project Approval Resolution” means City Council Resolution No. _______. “Project Area” means the land legally described on the attached Exhibit A. “Project Excess Return” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.4(e)(ii). “Project Plans” means the plans for the Project attached as Exhibit B. “Project TIF Adjustment” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.4(e)(iii). “Policy Guide” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.6(b)(vii). “Public Access Easement” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.7(a)(ii). “Public Parking” has the meaning set forth in Recital D. “PUD Ordinance” means City Ordinance No. _______. Execution Draft 6 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 “Purchase Right” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.6(g). “Qualified Redevelopment Costs” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.2(a). “Redevelopment Area” has the meaning set forth in Recital B. “Related Party” means with respect to any person or entity (i) any other person or entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with such person or entity; or (ii) any other person or entity in which the majority equity interest is owned by the parties that have a majority equity interest in such person or entity. “Sale Pro Forma” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.4(e)(i). “Sidewalks and Streetscapes” has the meaning set forth in Recital D. “State” means the state of Minnesota. “Tax Increments” means the tax increment (as defined in the TIF Act) derived from the Project Area which have been received and retained by the Authority in accordance with the provisions of the TIF Act, including without limitation Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177. “TIF” means tax increment financing pursuant to the TIF Act. “TIF Act” has the meaning set forth in Recital A. “TIF Assistance” means reimbursement of Qualified Redevelopment Costs through payments from the Authority to Developer of Available Tax Increments under the TIF Note, pursuant to the terms and conditions of Article III of this Agreement and the TIF Act. “TIF District” has the meaning set forth in Recital G. “TIF Note” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.3(a). “TIF Plan” has the meaning set forth in Recital G. “TIF Pro Forma” means a detailed financial pro forma for the Project, including total Project costs, sources and uses of Project financing, return calculations based on Project income and expenses, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit C, and all as updated by Developer from time to time in accordance with this Agreement based on actual and/or projected Project information, as the same becomes available during the development of the Project. “Unavoidable Delays” means actual delays in the Commencement and Completion of the Minimum Improvements, outside the reasonable control of Developer, to extent such actual delays are a result of (i) unusually severe or prolonged bad weather, (ii) acts of God, acts of war, civil unrest, terrorism, criminal conduct of third parties, fire or other casualty to the Project, (iii) litigation commenced by third parties, (iv) actions or inactions of any federal, State, or local government unit which directly result in delays, including a declared emergency under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 12 or due to pandemic or quarantine restrictions imposed by applicable Law, and/or (v) strikes, or other labor trouble, and in each instance to the extent Developer gives written notice to the Authority and City within 10 days after either the occurrence of such event giving rise to each Unavoidable Delay or Developer’s reasonable realization that the occurrence will cause an Unavoidable Delay. Execution Draft 7 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 Article II Representations and Warranties 2.1 Representations and Warranties of the City. The City makes the following representations and warranties: (a) The City is a Minnesota municipal corporation and has the power to enter into this Agreement and carry out its obligations hereunder. The City has duly authorized the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement. (b) There is not pending, nor to the best of the City’s knowledge is there threatened, any suit, action or proceeding against the City before any court, arbitrator, administrative agency or other governmental authority that may materially and adversely affect the validity of any of the transactions contemplated hereby, the ability of the City to perform its obligations hereunder or as contemplated hereby, or the validity or enforceability of this Agreement. (c) To the best of the City’s knowledge and belief, no member of the City Council or officer of the City, has either a direct or indirect financial interest in this Agreement, nor will any City Councilmember or officer of the City, benefit financially from this Agreement within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.009, as amended. (d) The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, and any other documents, instruments or actions required or contemplated pursuant to this Agreement by the City does not, and consummation of the transactions contemplated therein and the fulfillment of the terms thereof will not conflict with or constitute on the part of the City a breach of or default under any existing agreement or instrument to which the City is a party or violate any law, charter or other proceeding or action establishing or relating to the establishment and powers of the City or its officers, officials or resolutions. 2.2 Representations and Warranties of the Authority. The Authority makes the following representations and warranties: (a) The Authority is a public body corporate and politic and a governmental subdivision of the State, duly organized and existing under State law and the Authority has the authority to enter into this Agreement and carry out its obligations hereunder. (b) Except as provided in this Agreement, and provided that the Authority will fund fiscal disparities from within the TIF District, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, subdivision 3, the Authority agrees to retain all of the captured net tax capacity of the Project Area to finance the Qualified Redevelopment Costs as provided in this Agreement, and will elect that the duration of the TIF District will be the maximum duration permitted by the TIF Act. The Authority will not voluntarily take any action to reduce the amount of captured tax capacity retained to finance the Qualified Redevelopment Costs or to further reduce the duration of the District until the amount paid to Developer from Available Tax Increments reaches the maximum amount specified in Article III. (c) The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and any other documents or instruments required pursuant to this Agreement by the Authority does not, and consummation of the transactions contemplated therein and the fulfillment of the terms thereof will not, conflict with or constitute on the part of the Authority a breach of or default under any existing (i) indenture, mortgage, deed of trust or other agreement or instrument to which the Authority is a party or by which the Authority or any of its property is or may be bound, (ii) legislative act, constitution or other proceeding establishing or relating to the establishment of the Authority or its officers or its resolutions, or (iii) any Execution Draft 8 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 Minnesota statute or any provisions of any bond, debenture, loan agreement, regulation or order of the United States of America or the State, or any agency or political subdivisions thereof or any court order or judgment in any proceeding to which the Authority is or was a party by which it is bound. (d) There is not pending, nor to the best of the Authority’s knowledge is there threatened, any suit, action or proceeding against the Authority before any court, arbitrator, administrative agency or other governmental authority that may materially and adversely affect the validity of any of the transactions contemplated hereby, the ability of the Authority to perform its obligations hereunder or as contemplated hereby, or the validity or enforceability of this Agreement. (e) To the best of the Authority’s knowledge and belief, no member of the Board of the Authority or officer of the Authority, has either a direct or indirect financial interest in this Agreement, nor will any Commissioner of the Authority or officer of the Authority, benefit financially from this Agreement within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.009, as amended. 2.3 Representations and Warranties of Developer. Developer represents and warrants that: (a) Developer is a limited liability company organized and in good standing under the laws of the state of Delaware, is not in violation of any provisions of its operating agreement or other organizational documents or the laws of the State, has power to enter into this Agreement and has duly authorized the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by proper action of its members. (b) Developer holds a valid purchase contract to acquire the Project Area at a market price that is reflective of current regional market for redevelopment projects of the size and quality of the Minimum Improvements. The transaction contemplated by such purchase contract, as the same may be amended, is an arm’s length transaction and the buyer and seller have no other business relationship with respect to this Project. (c) The execution and delivery of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby, and the fulfillment of the terms and conditions thereof do not and will not conflict with or result in a breach of any material terms or conditions of Developer’s organizational documents, any restriction or any agreement or instrument to which Developer is now a party or by which it is bound or to which any property of Developer is subject, and do not and will not constitute a default under any of the foregoing or to the best of Developer’s knowledge be a violation of any order, decree, statute, rule or regulation of any court or of any state or Federal regulatory body having jurisdiction over Developer or its properties, including its interest in the Minimum Improvements, and do not and will not result in the creation or imposition of any lien, charge or encumbrance of any nature upon any of the property or assets of Developer contrary to the terms of any instrument or agreement to which Developer is a party or by which it is bound. (d) To the best of Developer’s knowledge and belief, the execution and delivery of this Agreement will not create a conflict of interest prohibited by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.009, as amended. (e) Developer would not construct the Minimum Improvements, but for the execution of this Agreement and the TIF Assistance for the Qualified Redevelopment Costs and other public assistance contemplated to be made available hereunder. (f) Developer shall reasonably cooperate with the City and the Authority with respect to any litigation commenced by third parties with respect to the Minimum Improvements; however, this Execution Draft 9 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 provision does not obligate Developer to incur costs, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement or elsewhere (g) There are no pending or to the best of Developer’s knowledge, threatened legal proceedings, of which Developer has notice, contemplating the liquidation or dissolution of Developer or threatening its existence, or seeking to restrain or enjoin the transactions contemplated by the Agreement, or questioning the authority of Developer to execute and deliver this Agreement or the validity of this Agreement. (h) Neither Developer nor any Related Party of Developer is currently delinquent in the payment of any business, occupation, sales, use, gross receipts, rental, real and personal property and other similar taxes imposed with respect to any real property owned or leased by any of such parties in the State. (i) Developer has not received any notice from any local, state or federal official that the activities of Developer or the Authority with respect to the Project Area may or will be in violation of any Environmental Law, except as has been identified in any report, audit, inspection or survey, undertaken by or provided to the City and the Authority. Developer represents that to the best of Developer’s knowledge: (i) it is not aware of any state or federal claim filed or planned to be filed by any party relating to any violation of any local, state or federal Environmental Law, regulation or review procedure, and (ii) it is not aware of any violation of any local, state or federal law, regulation or review procedure which would give any person a valid claim under any Environmental Law, including the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act or the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act. (j) Developer reasonably expects that it will be able to obtain private financing in an amount sufficient, together with funds provided by the Authority and any other public agencies, to enable Developer to successfully construct the Minimum Improvements, as provided herein. Article III TIF Assistance 3.1 Creation of TIF District; Certification. The Authority and City have taken all necessary actions to create and establish the TIF District as of the Effective Date. The TIF District has been created and established as a “redevelopment” district under the TIF Act. The Authority will cause the TIF District to be certified prior to June 30, 2022, such that Tax Increments will be available commencing in the calendar year 2025. Developer acknowledges and agrees that the Authority and the City may take appropriate steps to modify the TIF District in the future, including, without limitation, incorporating additional land into the TIF District. Developer shall cooperate with the Authority and the City with any such future modification, including to execute and deliver any supplements or modifications to this Agreement that are reasonably required in connection therewith, provided that no such modification or supplement shall (a) increase any obligation of Developer hereunder or (b) adversely affect any right of or benefit of Developer hereunder. 3.2 Qualified Redevelopment Costs. (a) Costs and expense for the items described below, initially paid by Developer from Developer’s own sources and incurred in furtherance of the construction and development of the Minimum Improvements, shall be eligible for TIF Assistance under the terms and conditions of this Agreement (collectively, “Qualified Redevelopment Costs”): (i) demolition of the existing structures and other existing improvements within the Project Area; Execution Draft 10 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 (ii) design and construction of the Public Parking; (iii) design and construction of the foundation work and underground parking serving the Minimum Improvements; (iv) design and construction of the Sidewalks and Streetscapes and other public realm improvements required in connection with this Agreement and/or the City Approvals; (v) stormwater management studies and design and construction of the stormwater management-related improvements required in connection with this Agreement and/or the City Approvals; (vi) acquisition of City rights in the Future City Land (defined below); (vii) TIF-related professional fees. (b) The actual amount of Qualified Redevelopment Costs within each of the foregoing categories may be allocated among such categories, subject to reasonable review and approval by the Authority, and provided that Developer must provide reasonable evidence of the actual amounts of Qualified Redevelopment Cost actually incurred or committed in each such category. 3.3 TIF Note. (a) TIF Note. In order for Developer to obtain the TIF Assistance contemplated by this Agreement, the Authority shall issue, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, one “pay- as-you-go” TIF note (“TIF Note”) in substantially the form attached as Exhibit G, with a maximum term of 15 years, and in the aggregate maximum principal amount of not to exceed $5,100,000.00, subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 3.4 and in no event shall the principal amount of the TIF Note exceed 6.10% of the actual, documented costs of the Minimum Improvements as shown in the updated TIF Pro Forma provided by Developer pursuant to Section 3.4(c). (b) Interest. The TIF Note shall bear simple interest on the unpaid principal balance thereof at a fixed rate equal to the lesser of: (i) the rate of interest charged by the lender providing the initial permanent financing (including any mini-perm loan used to pay-off the initial construction financing) in place following Completion of the Minimum Improvements which is secured by a first priority Mortgage on the Project Area, which rate shall be calculated once as of the date of the issuance of the TIF Note if permanent financing is in place as of such date; and (ii) 4.00% per annum. (c) Payments and Interest. Semi-annual payments upon and accrual of interest on the unpaid principal balance of the TIF Note will commence upon the Authority’s issuance of the TIF Note, all in accordance with terms and condition set forth in the TIF Note. (d) Condition of Issuance. The Authority’s obligation to issue the TIF Note to Developer is subject to satisfaction of each of the following conditions: Execution Draft 11 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 (i) Developer shall have provided evidence satisfactory to the Authority that Developer has actually incurred (A) Qualified Redevelopment Costs in an amount equal to at least the amount of the requested TIF Note and (B) total Project costs corresponding to the line item detail shown in the initial TIF Pro Forma attached as Exhibit C; (ii) Developer shall have provided evidence satisfactory to the Authority that all parties have been paid for work related to the completion of the Minimum Improvements (e.g., lien waivers or similar); (iii) Developer shall have provided the updated TIF Pro Forma to the Authority, and the Authority shall have completed their review, analysis, and audit of the same as necessary to determine the original principal amount of the TIF Note in accordance with Section 3.4(c); (iv) Developer shall have submitted documentation necessary to secure all grant payments as well as other documents to administer the closing of all grant agreements. (v) Developer shall have granted to the City and/or the Authority, as applicable, each of the City Easements; each of the City Easements shall have been recorded against the applicable portion of the Project Area; and the Public Parking, the Sidewalks and Streetscapes, and the Future City Land shall have been open to the public pursuant to the terms of each applicable City Easement agreement; (vi) Developer shall have executed the Affordable Housing Restrictive Covenant and caused the same to be recorded against the Project Area; (vii) Developer shall have granted to the Authority the Purchase Right and caused the same to be recorded against the Project Area; (viii) Developer has delivered to the Authority a final report and certificate detailing and certifying as to Developer’s activities and final outcomes of Developer’s efforts to achieve the Equity and Inclusion goals under Section 12 of this Agreement; and (ix) No Developer Default or Developer Event of Default have occurred and be ongoing under this Agreement and no Developer default shall exist under any of the City Approvals. (x) the Certificate of Completion for the Minimum Improvements shall have been issued by the Authority in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement; (e) No Representation or Warranty. Payments of principal and interest under the TIF Note shall be payable solely from Available Tax Increments from the Project Area. The Authority does not represent or warrant the amounts of Available Tax Increments that will be available for payment principal and interest under the TIF Note. The Authority will not reimburse Developer for Qualified Redevelopment Costs from Authority revenues, other than from Available Tax Increments, nor guaranty the amount of money which Developer will receive as a reimbursement, such amount being payable solely from the Available Tax Increments in accordance with this section, unless the Authority elects, in its sole and absolute discretion, with no obligation to do so, to pay down the TIF Note from other funds. Execution Draft 12 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 3.4 TIF Assistance and Potential Adjustment. (a) Generally. The financial assistance to Developer under this Agreement is based on certain assumptions regarding anticipated costs and expenses associated with constructing the Minimum Improvements. Specifically, the maximum aggregate principal amount of the TIF Note has been determined based on the amount of assistance needed to make the Minimum Improvements financially feasible, as shown in the initial TIF Pro Forma attached as Exhibit C. The Authority and Developer agree that those assumptions will be reviewed at the times described in this section, and that the amount of TIF Assistance provided herein shall be adjusted in accordance with this Section 3.4. (b) Definitions. For the purposes of this section, the following terms have the following meanings: (i) “Cash Flow” means Net Operating Income less debt service (principal and interest) with respect to the Mortgage loan(s) encumbering the Minimum Improvements. (ii) “Cash-on-Cost Return” means Net Operating Income divided by the sum of the total actual cost of the Minimum Improvements (less any grants or City, Authority, federal or State funds received by Developer) as set forth in an updated TIF Pro Forma. For purposes of clarity, an example calculations of the Cash-On-Cost Return is included in the initial TIF Pro Forma attached as Exhibit C. (iii) “IRR” means the internal rate of return for the Minimum Improvements, where the IRR is calculated as the annualized return of the annual cash flow over the applicable period on Developer’s actual utilization of equity for Project costs. For purposes of clarity, example calculations of IRR are attached hereto in Exhibit H. (iv) “Net Operating Income” means total income and other project-derived revenue, including payments under the TIF Note, less Operating Expenses. (v) “Operating Expenses” means reasonable and customary expenses incurred in operating the Minimum Improvements and any other improvements and land within the Project Area or properly allocated to the Project Area, including, but not limited to all management and related expenses, all real estate taxes and special assessments for the Project Area. (vi) “Stabilization” means (A) 95% of the residential units in the Minimum Improvements are leased with a term of at least six months and (B) 100% of the commercial space is leased. (c) Confirmation of TIF Assistance Upon Project Completion. After substantial completion of the Project, but before, and as a condition to, issuance of the Certificate of Completion and issuance of the TIF Note, Developer shall provide to the Authority an updated TIF Pro Forma based on actual, documented costs of the Minimum Improvements and any reasonable and relevant information and documentation as the Authority requires in order to calculate the reasonably anticipated Cash-on-Cost Return for the Minimum Improvements and to otherwise confirm that the “but for” finding adopted by the City and the Authority continues to be satisfied. The Authority may retain a financial advisor, accountant, and/or other professional with similar expertise to audit the submitted updated TIF Pro Forma, at Developer’s cost. If the updated TIF Pro Forma demonstrates that the reasonably anticipated Cash-on-Cost Return for the Minimum Improvements exceeds 6.03% (the “Market Return Rate”), then the amount of TIF Assistance provided herein, as reflected in the principal amount of the TIF Note, shall be reduced based on Execution Draft 13 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 the actual TIF Assistance that is sufficient to assist the Minimum Improvements to achieve the Market Return Rate based on the updated TIF Pro Forma. Additionally, the actual use of the contingency funds shall be identified in detail in the updated TIF Pro Forma. In no case shall the developer fee be increased from the amount in the initial TIF Pro Forma attached as Exhibit C. Any increase in Project expenses must be documented and substantiated and covered from contingency funds, and unwarranted increases shall not be allowed. Furthermore, the principal amount of the TIF Note may be reduced if Project contingency funds have been used in a manner that enhances the residential amenities and private spaces with no benefit to the public. (d) Review of TIF Assistance Upon Stabilization. No later than sixty (60) days after Stabilization, Developer shall provide to the Authority with an updated TIF Pro Forma and any reasonable and relevant information and documentation as the Authority requires in order to calculate the annual Cash- On-Cost Return based on financial conditions at Stabilization. The Authority may retain a financial advisor, accountant, and/or other professional with similar expertise to audit the submitted updated TIF Pro Forma, at Developer’s cost. If such information demonstrates that the Cash-on-Cost Return for the Minimum Improvements exceeds the Market Return Rate, then the amount of TIF Assistance provided herein, as reflected in the principal amount of the TIF Note, shall be reduced based on the actual TIF Assistance necessary to assist the Minimum Improvements to achieve the Market Return Rate based on the Cash-on- Cost Return at Stabilization. In such event, Developer shall surrender the original TIF Note to the Authority and the Authority will reissue the TIF Note at such reduced principal and payment amounts sufficient to assist the Minimum Improvements to achieve the Market Return Rate. (e) Sale Lookback and Determination of Project Excess Returns. (i) No later than 30 days after each sale of all or part of the Minimum Improvements to any party other than a Related Party occurring prior to the date upon which the TIF Note is paid in full or terminated hereunder, Developer shall submit to the Authority an updated TIF Pro Forma and any other reasonable and relevant information and documentation as the Authority requires in order to calculate the IRR for such sale, including, without limitation, a certified cost and revenue analysis for such sale prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“Sale Pro Forma”). This analysis will include, without limitation, all acquisition costs, Qualified Redevelopment Costs, and all other improvement and redevelopment costs incurred by Developer for the Project, as well as historical Net Operating Income, debt service, and TIF Note payments. The Authority may retain a financial advisor, accountant, and/or other professional with similar expertise to audit the submitted Sale Pro Forma, at Developer’s cost (ii) The Sale Pro Forma and related information shall be used by the Authority to determine whether the sale yields a “Project Excess Return” to Developer. The IRR shall be used to measure any Project Excess Return in accordance with the following sliding scale: Period of Sale IRR beyond which Project Excess Return is created Before three (3) years after Completion 22.0% From three (3) years to six (5) years after Completion 20.0% Execution Draft 14 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 From six (6) years to nine (9) years after Completion 18.0% More than nine (9) years after Completion 16.0% (iii) Should the Developer’s proceeds of such sale of the Minimum Improvements, or a part thereof, exceed the applicable IRR (i.e., the Project Excess Return), payments on the TIF Note shall cease, the outstanding balance forgiven, and the TIF Note shall automatically terminate. In the event of any sale of the Minimum Improvements (partial or full) in which the Project Excess Return exceeds the then outstanding principal balance of the TIF Note, Developer shall pay such excess (the “Project TIF Adjustment”) in lawful money of the United States within 30 days from the date on which the Authority gives Developer notice of the amount of the Project TIF Adjustment due to the Authority; provided, however, in no event shall the Project TIF Adjustment exceed the aggregate sum of all payments (both principal and interest) actually made by the Authority to Developer under the TIF Note. Until the Authority is paid the Project TIF Adjustment in full, the Authority shall have a lien in its favor upon the Minimum Improvements to secure the amount of the Project TIF Adjustment. Such lien shall attach and take effect from the date of the sale of the Minimum Improvements contemplated by this section. Any such lien may be foreclosed as a mortgage on real estate if the Project TIF Adjustment is not paid by the date required by this section. A lien under this section is prior to all other liens and encumbrances on the Minimum Improvements except (1) the first priority Mortgage on the Project Area; (2) liens for real estate taxes and other governmental assessments or charges against the Minimum Improvements; and (3) all leases executed prior to the date that the lien attaches and takes effect. The parties will reasonably cooperate with the sale process and work in good faith to promptly determine any Project TIF Adjustment such that any Project TIF Adjustment is paid by Developer at or before the closing of the sale of the Minimum Improvements so as to avoid any unreasonable delay to the closing of such sale. (iv) If the sale does not result in Excess Returns to Developer, payments on the TIF Note shall continue pursuant to the terms of the existing TIF Note. (v) For purposes of clarity, example calculations of the Project TIF Adjustment pursuant to this Section 3.4(e) are attached hereto in Exhibit H. 3.5 Assignment of Note. The TIF Note shall not be assignable or transferable without the prior written consent of the Authority, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld; provided, however, Developer may, without the City’s or the Authority’s consent collaterally assign Developer’s rights and obligations under this Agreement and the TIF Note to the holder of any Mortgage that is permitted under the terms of Section 5.1. Any assignee or transferee must execute and deliver to the Authority a certificate, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Authority, pursuant to which, among other things, such assignee or transferee acknowledges and represents: (i) the limited nature of the Authority’s payment obligations under the TIF Note; (ii) that the TIF Note is being acquired for investment for such assignee’s or transferee’s own account, not as a nominee or agent, and not with a view to the resale or distribution of any part thereof; Execution Draft 15 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 (iii) that the assignee or transferee has no present intention of selling, granting any participation in, or otherwise distributing the same; (iv) that the assignee or transferee, either alone or with such assignee’s or transferee’s representatives, has knowledge and experience in financial and business matters and is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of the prospective investment in the TIF Note and the assignee or transferee is able to bear the economic consequences thereof; (v) that in making its decision to acquire the TIF Note, the assignee or transferee has relied upon independent investigations made by the assignee or transferee and, to the extent believed by such assignee or transferee to be appropriate, the assignee’s or transferee’s representatives, including its own professional, tax and other advisors, and has not relied upon any representation or warranty from the Authority, or any of its officers, employees, agents, affiliates or representatives, with respect to the value of the TIF Note; (vi) that the Authority has not made any warranty, acknowledgment or covenant, in writing or otherwise, to the assignee or transferee regarding the tax consequences, if any, of the acquisition and investment in the TIF Note; (vii) that the assignee or transferee or its representatives have been given a full opportunity to examine all documents and to ask questions of, and to receive answers from, the Authority and its representatives concerning the terms of the TIF Note and such other information as the assignee or transferee desires in order to evaluate the acquisition of and investment in the TIF Note, and all such questions have been answered to the full satisfaction of the assignee or transferee; (viii) that the assignee or transferee has evaluated the merits and risks of investment in the TIF Note and has determined that the TIF Note is a suitable investment for the assignee or transferee in light of such party’s overall financial condition and prospects; (ix) that the TIF Note will be characterized as “restricted securities” under the federal securities laws because the TIF Note is being acquired in a transaction not involving a public offering and that under such laws and applicable regulations such securities may not be resold without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except in certain limited circumstances; and (x) for purposes of federal securities laws, that no market for the TIF Note exists and no market for the TIF Note is intended to be developed. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Section 3.5, the holder of the TIF Note may be different than the owner of the Project Area or the party responsible for the obligations of Developer under the Redevelopment Agreement, provided, however, that such holder will be subject to all limitations and conditions to payments under the TIF Note set forth herein. 3.6 Action to Reduce Taxes. Throughout the term of this Agreement, Developer shall take no action, and suffer no circumstances to exist or action to be taken by others (to the extent Developer may prevent the same), the effect of which would be to render the Project Area or any portion thereof to be no longer generally subject to real property taxation. Before the expiration or termination of this Agreement, Developer shall not: Execution Draft 16 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 (a) seek administrative review or judicial review of the applicability of any tax statute relating to the taxation of the Property determined by any tax official to be applicable or raise the inapplicability of any such tax statute as a defense in any proceedings, including delinquent tax proceedings; (b) seek administrative review or judicial review of the constitutionality of any tax statute relating to the taxation of the Property determined by any tax official, or raise the unconstitutionality of any such tax statute as a defense in any proceedings, including delinquent tax proceedings; or (c) seek any tax deferral or abatement, either presently or prospectively authorized under any state or federal law, of the taxation of the Property. 3.7 Reservation of Tax Increments; Additional Public Benefits. Developer, the City and the Authority acknowledge and agree that all Tax Increments that are not required to be paid to Developer under the terms of this Agreement and the TIF Note will be reserved to the Authority for qualified City projects. By way of example and not limitation, it is anticipated that approximately $11.4 million of Tax Increments will not be used by Developer, but will be retained by the Authority for Project-related City public improvement costs that improve the connectivity of the Project to the surrounding transportation network while also benefiting the nearby neighborhoods and the general public (collectively, the “Future City Transportation Infrastructure Project”). For illustrative purposes only, attached hereto as Exhibit I is preliminary concept plan for such Future City Transportation Infrastructure Project. Article IV Project Requirements 4.1 Commencement and Completion of Project. (a) The timeline for the Commencement and Completion of the Minimum Improvements is identified in this Section 4.1. Following Commencement, construction or other activity must continue in a sequence consistent with normal redevelopment and construction practices. Failure to meet any of the dates identified as “Default Date” shall be considered a default, unless mutually determined to be the result of Unavoidable Delay. (b) The Commencement and Completion timeline for the Minimum Improvements is as follow: Description of Work Commencement Date Completion Date Anticipated Default Date Anticipated Default Date Final Zoning Approvals N/A N/A October 31, 2021 December 31, 2021 Real Estate Acquisition Closing N/A N/A December 1, 2021 March 1, 2022 Submission of “Go Ahead” Letter N/A N/A December 1, 2021 May 1, 2022 Demolition February 1, 2022 May 1, 2022 March 1, 2022 June 1, 2022 Site Remediation March 1, 2022 June 1, 2022 April 1, 2022 July 1, 2022 Specified Site Preparation March 1, 2022 June 1, 2022 April 1, 2022 July 1, 2022 Execution Draft 17 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 Description of Work Commencement Date Completion Date Anticipated Default Date Anticipated Default Date Foundation April 1, 2022 July 1, 2022 August 1, 2022 November 1, 2022 Shell Construction August 1, 2022 November 1, 2022 October 1, 2023 February 1, 2024 Core Construction/Tenant Improvements August 1, 2022 November 1, 2022 October 1, 2023 February 1, 2024 Certificate of Occupancy* N/A N/A April 1, 2024 August 1, 2024 Certificate of Completion N/A N/A December 31, 2024 N/A (c) Market Value of Minimum Improvements. It is anticipated that upon completion, the total cost of the Minimum Improvements will be approximately $85,069,119. 4.2 Zoning and Land Use Approvals. Nothing in this Agreement shall limit the authority of the City with respect to zoning and land use approvals. Subject to the foregoing, the staff of the Authority shall cooperate with Developer and assist Developer in the processing and obtaining of zoning and land use approvals. Developer shall be responsible for applying for and obtaining all land use and zoning approvals necessary for the Project, including, without limitation, any conditions contained in the City Approvals. All zoning and land use approvals shall be by the City Council or the City Planning Commission in accordance with the ordinances of the City. Notwithstanding the foregoing and for avoidance of doubt, in addition to the Authority’s other rights and remedies hereunder, the Authority’s consent shall be required for any changes to the Minimum Improvements, specifically including, without limitation, changes to the scale, massing or exterior finish materials set forth in the original City Approvals that could reduce the taxable value of the Project Area 4.3 Building and Construction Permits. Nothing in this Agreement shall limit the governmental authority of the City with respect to its building and construction permitting process for the Project. Developer shall comply with all applicable City building codes and construction requirements and shall be responsible for obtaining all building permits prior to construction. 4.4 Restrictions on Development. Developer may not construct or permit construction of any of the Project until Developer satisfies the following conditions: (a) Developer executes and records the Development Contract against the Project Area, and causes any lien holder affecting any of the property to subject its interest as provided in this Agreement and in the Development Contract; (b) Developer satisfies all of the conditions precedent to construction of the Project established by the City in the City Approvals; and (c) Developer executes and records a Memorandum of Agreement in accordance with Section 10.16 hereof. 4.5 Submission and Approval of Evidence of Financing and Land Acquisition. No later than the issuance of the applicable construction or building permit for the Minimum Improvements, Developer shall provide the Authority with the Go-Ahead Letter, including the Financing Commitments and final Execution Draft 18 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 purchase agreement and other land acquisition documents sufficient for the Authority to confirm the actual Project Area acquisition cost. If Developer fails to submit the Go-Ahead Letter and the foregoing information acceptable to the Authority within said period of time or any additional period to which the Authority may agree, the Authority may notify Developer of its failure to comply with the requirement of this Section 4.5, such failure being a Default hereunder. 4.6 Affordable Housing. (a) Affordable Housing Requirements. Developer covenants that at least 10% of the residential units within the Minimum Improvements, but in no event fewer than 20 of such residential units (the “Affordable Units”) will be leased at rates (inclusive of utilities and mandatory fees, such as parking) that are considered affordable to individuals or households earning less than 50% of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Area Median Income for the Minneapolis-Saint Paul-Bloomington Metropolitan Statistical Area for a period of 21 years commencing on the date that all the Affordable Units are first occupied by qualified households (the “Affordable Housing Requirements”). (b) The Affordable Housing Requirements shall also incorporate and include the following conditions and requirements: (i) no security deposit shall be required in excess of the amount of one month of rent in connection with any Affordable Unit; (ii) during the final year of the affordability period, new leases for the Affordable Units must be for a term of no less than six months, and such newly leased Affordable Units will be subject to all the Affordable Housing Requirements until the expiration of such new leases; (iii) Developer shall affirmatively market the Affordable Units to one or more traditionally underserved populations as affordable at the rates required hereunder; (iv) prior to Commencement of the Minimum Improvements, Developer shall notify the Authority of Developer’s initial determination as to whether the Affordable Units will be “fixed” to particular housing units within the Minimum Improvements or floating among various housing units with the Minimum Improvements. If the Affordable Units are to be fixed, Developer shall provide the Authority with the unit numbers of such fixed Affordable Units; (v) the two-bedroom units must be leased to households consisting of at least two members; (vi) During the affordability period, Developer will not refuse to lease an Affordable Unit to the holder of a voucher or certificate of eligibility under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 solely because of the status of the prospective tenant as such a holder. (vii) the Affordable Units shall be subject to the terms and condition of the Inclusionary Housing Policy Program Guide (“Policy Guide”), a current version of which is attached as Exhibit J, provided, however, the Affordable Housing Requirements hereunder shall not include changes in the Policy Guide adopted by the City which differ from the Policy Guide attached as Exhibit J; and Execution Draft 19 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 (viii) Developer shall, upon annual invoicing, reimburse the City (or such subdivision of the City administrating the Affordable Housing Requirements) for third- party expenses related to monitoring of Developer’s compliance with the Affordable Housing Requirements, which such costs shall initially not exceed $2,700 per year (plus any additional costs necessitated by re-inspections for noncompliance with the Affordable Housing Requirements) and thereafter be subject to reasonable adjustment from time to time. (c) Compliance with Affordable Housing Requirements. For avoidance of doubt, any failure by Developer to comply with the Affordable Housing Requirements will be a Default under this Agreement and, if such Default is not cured within any applicable notice and cure period hereunder, it shall be an Event of Default, during which, in addition to the City’s and Authority’s other rights and remedies hereunder, payments and accrual of interest on the TIF Note shall be suspended. (d) Restrictive Covenant. The Affordable Housing Requirements will be set forth in a restrictive covenant in substantially the form shown in the attached Exhibit K and to be recorded against the Project Area prior to, and as a condition to, the issuance of the TIF Note (the “Affordable Housing Restrictive Covenant”). The Affordable Housing Restrictive Covenant shall not be subordinated or junior to any Mortgage on the Minimum Improvements, and if any Mortgage exists at the time the Affordable Housing Restrictive Covenant is to be recorded, Developer shall cause the mortgagee under such Mortgage to subordinates the Mortgage and the lien thereof to the Affordable Housing Restrictive Covenant. (e) Affordable Unit Mix. The Affordable Units shall consist of at least four (4) studio units, ten (10) one bedroom units, and six (6) two bedroom units. Any change in the foregoing distribution of units shall require the prior written approval of the Authority, which such consent will not be unreasonably conditioned, delayed or withheld. Any change in the unit distribution shall be accounted for in any updated TIF Pro Forma. (f) Affordable Unit Size and Amenities. Residents of the affordable units shall have the same access to building amenities as residents of the market-rate units. The minimum size of the affordable units shall be: studio: 500 square feet; one-bedroom: 700 square feet; and two-bedrooms: 1,000 square feet. The level of finish within the affordable units must be consistent with the level of finish within new construction, affordable apartments in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. (g) Purchase Right. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Completion and as a condition to issuance of the TIF Note, Developer shall grant to the Authority the one-time right to purchase one or more of the Affordable Units (the “Purchase Right”), which such Purchase Right shall be exercisable by the Authority only in the event the Affordable Units are converted from rental units to condominium or other for-sale units during the term of the TIF District. The Purchase Right shall be granted to Authority pursuant to a Right of First Purchase Option agreement in the form attached as Exhibit L and on the terms and conditions set forth therein. (h) Future Extension of Affordable Housing. On or about the date which is one year before the original expiration of the Affordable Housing Restrictive Covenant, the Authority and Developer shall negotiate in good faith the terms and conditions of an extension of initial 21-year term of the Affordable Housing Restrictive Covenant. Both parties agree to negotiate in good faith but without binding either party to a particular outcome. 4.7 Public Easements Execution Draft 20 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 (a) Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Completion and as a condition to issuance of the TIF Note, Developer shall grant to the City or the Authority (at City and Authority’s discretion) the following easements with respect to the Minimum Improvements (each a “City Easement”, and collectively the “City Easements”): (i) A permanent, public easements for access and use of the Public Parking (the “Parking Easement”), subject to reasonable, nondiscriminatory limitations, rules and regulations governing its use adopted by Developer and approved by City Manager or its designee. The Public Parking shall include typical signage that identifies the same as being available for public parking. Developer shall be responsible for all maintenance of the Public Parking at no cost or expense to the City or Authority. The Parking Easements shall be granted pursuant to easement agreements in the form attached as Exhibit M. (ii) A permanent, public easement for access and use of the Sidewalks and Streetscapes (the “Public Access Easement”), subject to reasonable, nondiscriminatory limitations, rules and regulations governing its use adopted by Developer and subject to the approval of the City Manager or its designee. The Public Access Easement shall be granted pursuant to an easement agreement in a form reasonably required by the City attorney. (iii) A perpetual easement over the approximately 10,500 square feet of the Project Area in the area generally depicted on the Project Plans attached as Exhibit B and designated thereon and referred to herein as the “Future City Land” (the “Future Land Easement”). The Future Land Easement shall allow any public use of the Future City Land by the City and shall include future purchase right for the City or the Authority to convert the ownership in the Future City Land to fee title for the minimum required consideration. The Future Land Easement and related rights shall be granted pursuant to an easement agreement in the form attached as Exhibit O. For purposes of the Future Land Easement, “public use” shall mean (A) transportation routes and improvements, including, but not limited to: roadways, sidewalks, trails and wayfinding systems, (B) infrastructure and utility uses and improvements, including but not limited to, water, sewer, stormwater, communication, telecommunication, energy generation and transmission; and including both publicly owned and privately owned utilities, and/or (C) green or other open space for landscaping, gardening, public art, public gathering and/or similar uses, together with related improvements. (b) Other Terms of City Easements. Neither the City nor the Authority will pay an acquisition cost to Developer for any of the City Easements. Each City Easement must be recorded by Developer as a condition to issuance of the TIF Note. Developer shall, at Developer’s sole cost and expense, either cause a licensed surveyor to determine the final, actual legal description of the Public Parking, the Sidewalks and Streetscapes, and the Future City Land for the purpose of the granting the City Easements with respect to such elements. Such legal descriptions will be consistent with the areas and boundaries of such areas as described and depicted in the City Approvals and the exhibits to this Agreement. (c) Future Transit Easements. Developer agrees to grant future easements for future mass transit (e.g., bus) stops in open areas of the Project Area adjoining public rights-of-way at no cost to the City, the Authority, or the responsible transit agency(ies), subject only to the responsible transit agency(ies) being responsible for initial construction and maintenance of the surface improvements in any future easement area. Execution Draft 21 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 4.8 Streetscape Elements and Public Art. The Project shall include public art in the area generally depicted on the Project Plans attached as Exhibit B, such public art shall be a permanent sculpture or similar art installation and Developer shall (a) engage a professional art consultant or a landscape architect experienced in public art visioning, commissioning, and implementation in connection with the creation of such public art and (b) such installation shall have a value of no less than $200,000.00, in the aggregate, in and for such public art (exclusive of fees paid to such professional art consultant and exclusive of costs for other aspects of the Minimum Improvements which are installed in connection with or ancillary to such public art, but which do not directly form a part of such public art). Developer shall at all times maintain the public art in good, first class condition, at no cost to the City or the Authority. 4.9 Coordination with Future City Infrastructure Improvements. Related to the Project, the City may construct improvements to the roadway network and sidewalk system that serves the Project Area and the surrounding areas. Developer shall work in cooperation with the City and the City’s design and construction team to coordinate the final streetscape design taking into consideration the potential realignment of the Willson Road and Eden Avenue curblines. The City will strive to design the new roadway layout before Developer installs the new curb, utilities and streetscape. 4.10 Equity and Inclusion. Developer shall cause its general contractor to use good faith efforts as defined by Minnesota Department of Human Rights to include businesses that are majority owned by under-represented groups including minorities, women, veterans and people with disabilities in the development and construction of the Project. Developer shall also cause its general contractor to use, good faith efforts to employ under-represented people on the construction site. (a) Good Faith Efforts. For the purpose of this section, “good faith efforts” shall be defined by compliance with the following: (i) At the Project site • Post EEO policy and anti-harassment policies prominently on employee bulletin boards and job sites. Update at least once a year with new contact information and signature of the contractor’s chief executive officer. • Post all government-mandated posters (Minnesota, federal, local) in areas available to employees and applicants and on all job sites. • All job sites to the extent possible should be accessible to people with disabilities, specifically people with mobility impairments (restrooms, break-rooms, etc.). If all restrooms are not accessible, provide comparable facilities for people with disabilities. • Check employee locker rooms, break rooms, restrooms, and work areas (job sites) for potentially offensive cartoons, etc. (ii) Recruiting • All personnel involved in hiring, selection, promotion, disciplinary and related processes should be trained to ensure the elimination of bias (implicit bias training) in personnel actions Execution Draft 22 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 • Include an EEO tagline or similar statement in all want ads or other external job announcements. If you post jobs on your web site, include an EEO tagline. • Communicate to the union to ensure that the union accepts people for membership in a nondiscriminatory way and that they refer people to jobs fairly. • Make formal and informal contact with community organizations, apprenticeship training organizations, and unions, and other recruitment organizations (specifically those organizations that focus on women, people of color, Indigenous people, and people with disabilities) that may be able to refer qualified applicants for jobs you have available. • Provide training, preparation and workplace accommodations so that people with disabilities can have rewarding careers. • Contact the Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) Vocational Rehabilitation Services unit for the purpose of forming partnerships to help prepare people with disabilities for meaningful employment opportunities. • Participate in construction community job fairs or other construction-related events. • When using paid advertising, include news media or websites geared toward women, communities of color, and/or people with disabilities. (iii) Selection and Hiring • Review your application form and remove any questions that are not job-related. Include an EEO statement on the form itself. Review the application to make sure no illegal/potentially illegal information is requested. • Review EEO/Applicant tracking surveys: they should ask for necessary tracking information only and should be clearly marked as voluntary. Remove the forms from the application itself before the selection process begins. • Make sure supervisors are using legal criteria in their hiring decisions. • If you use any pre-employment tests (math tests, typing tests, skill tests, “personality” or “integrity” tests), these tests should directly relate to the jobs for which they’re used. (iv) Termination of Employment • Develop a written termination policy and/or progressive discipline policy. All supervisors should implement your process consistently. Execution Draft 23 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 • If appropriate, conduct exit interviews or administer exit surveys. (v) Employee Files and Record-Keeping • Retain all information that could reveal age, race, disability, religion, etc. as confidentially as possible. (I-9 forms, insurance forms, medical leave requests, etc.) • An employee’s file should tell the complete story of this employee’s history with your company: orientation, training, performance evaluations, wage increases, promotion information, disciplinary notices, etc. All pay increases should be documented, and nondiscriminatory reasons for pay should be obvious. (Some companies create a checklist for each employee file so that they can be certain that all important documentation is retained.) • Retain applications for at least a year. Develop an applicant flow log or similar tracking system. Make sure that you can track each applicant back to their EEO survey or affirmative action data page, if completed. (You cannot conduct a meaningful analysis of your selection process without this information.) • All files of terminated employees should show the reason for termination, whether voluntary or involuntary. (vi) Other • Conduct training for all employees of your EEO and anti- harassment policies in safety meetings at the beginning of each project and additionally throughout the year for new hires. Emphasize reporting procedures. • Make reasonable efforts to solicit people of color, Indigenous, and female-owned businesses to participate in subcontracts or vendor contracts. (b) Developer shall cause its general contractor to implement the equity and inclusion outreach plan attached as Exhibit P, (the “Outreach Plan”) as may be modified with the Authority’s prior written consent, which consent shall will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. For a project of this scale and complexity, Developer anticipates that the labor hours contributed by women is approximately five percent (5%) of the total labor hours and that the labor hours contributed by Black, Indigenous and other people of color (BIPOC) is approximately ten percent (10%) of the total labor hours. These estimates are not considered minimums but merely estimates based on Developer’s knowledge of the available qualified workforce. (c) Upon Completion, and as a condition to issuance of the Certificate of Completion and TIF Note, Developer shall submit the Equity and Inclusion Report in substantially the form attached as Exhibit Q. This report shall summarize the actual percentages attained after implementation of the Outreach Plan. This report shall include, without limitation: Execution Draft 24 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 (i) business name, trade category, contact name and business address of each MBE, WBE, or VBE firm engaged in the Project; (ii) total hours worked for each construction trade; (iii) hours worked for each construction trade by minority workers including women workers, and workers considered BIPOC; (iv) employer of the BIPOC and women workers; and (v) calculation of percentage. (d) In the event that the Authority reasonably determines that Developer has not used good faith effort to achieve these goals (by failing to cause its contractor to comply with the approved Outreach Plan), a penalty shall be assessed by the Authority. The penalty shall be a cash payment made to a workforce training organization that actively trains underrepresented people in the construction trades. The penalty shall be no more than $100,000. 4.11 Effect of Delay. Developer acknowledges that if construction of the Minimum Improvements is delayed due to Unavoidable Delays or for any other reason, this could affect the amount of Available Tax Increments and thus the total amount which may be available to pay the TIF Note. Developer acknowledges that if the Completion of the Minimum Improvements is delayed due to Unavoidable Delays or for any other reason, there will be no compensation to Developer or any other party for any reduction in the amount available to pay or refund the TIF Note. 4.12 Additional Responsibilities of Developer. (a) Developer shall cause the Minimum Improvements to be constructed, operated and maintained in substantial accordance with the terms of this Agreement, the Final Development Plans and Development Contract, and all applicable Law (including, without limitation, zoning, building code and public health laws and regulations). (b) Developer shall obtain, in a timely manner, all required permits, licenses, and approvals, and will meet, in a timely manner, all requirements of all applicable Law that must be obtained or met before the Project may be lawfully constructed. (c) Developer shall not construct any building or other structures on, over, or within the boundary lines of any public utility easement unless such construction is provided for in such easement, approved by the utility involved, or approved by the City if no utility is then utilizing the easement area. (d) Prior to delivery of a Certificate of Completion to Developer, upon the request of the Authority, Developer shall, after reasonable advance notice from the Authority, provide the Authority and the City with reasonable access to the Property to inspect the Project for compliance with this Agreement. (e) Prior to delivery of the Certificate of Completion, Developer shall deliver monthly progress reports to the Authority. The progress reports shall include: summary of progress to date, percent construction completion, identification of any Unavoidable Delays, and projected occupancy date. Execution Draft 25 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 (f) Developer shall comply and cause its contractors to comply with all applicable Environmental Law as it relates to the Project Area and the Minimum Improvements. 4.13 Certificate of Completion. Developer may notify the Authority and request a Certificate of Completion in accordance with this section. Developer may request a Certificate of Completion for the Minimum Improvements after the City has issued a final certificate of occupancy covering all elements of the Minimum Improvements. Within 30 days after receipt of such request, the Authority shall inspect the Minimum Improvements to determine if such Minimum Improvements have been completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. An example of the Authority’s Completion checklist is included as part of the form of Certificate of Completion attached as Exhibit E. Following such inspection the Authority shall either furnish Developer with (a) an appropriate Certificate of Completion or (b) a written statement, indicating in adequate detail in what respects Developer has failed to complete the relevant portion of the Minimum Improvements and what measures or acts will be necessary, in the opinion of the Authority, for Developer to take or perform in order to obtain such certification. If the Authority issues a written statement in accordance with clause (b) above, Developer shall thereafter take such actions necessary to cure such deficiencies in the applicable Minimum Improvements. After such deficiencies have been cured, Developer shall notify the Authority and the Authority will re-inspect the applicable Minimum Improvements and take one of the actions described in clauses (a) and (b) hereof, and such process will continue until the Authority issues the applicable Certificate of Completion. Issuance of a Certificate of Completion by the Authority shall be a conclusive determination of satisfaction and termination of the agreements and covenants in this Agreement with respect to the obligations of Developer to construct, or cause to be constructed, the Minimum Improvements. Article V Encumbrance of the Project Area 5.1 Mortgage of the Project Area. (a) Until the Completion of the Minimum Improvements, Developer shall not engage in any financing or any other transaction creating any mortgage or other security interest in or lien upon the Project Area, or portion thereof, whether by express agreement or operation of law (a “Mortgage”), or suffer any Mortgage to be made on or attach to the Project Area except for the purpose of obtaining funds necessary for acquiring and constructing the Minimum Improvements and paying the costs set forth in the TIF Pro Forma. (b) This restriction on encumbrance shall terminate upon Completion of the Minimum Improvements. Developer or any successor in interest to the Minimum Improvements or portion thereof, may sell or engage in financing or any other transaction creating a mortgage or encumbrance or lien on the Minimum Improvements or portion thereof after the Certificate of Completion has been obtained with respect to the Minimum Improvements, without obtaining the prior written approval of the Authority. (c) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, Developer is authorized, without the approval of the Authority, to obtain acquisition and construction financing to cover the costs of acquisition and construction of the Minimum Improvements and the costs set forth in the TIF Pro Forma and to mortgage the Project Area to provide security for acquisition and construction financing. 5.2 Copy of Notice of Default to Mortgagee. If the City or the Authority delivers any notice or demand to Developer with respect to any Default under this Agreement, the City or the Authority, as applicable, will endeavor to also deliver a copy of such notice or demand to the mortgagee of any Mortgage at the address of such mortgagee provided in the recorded Mortgage or any other address thereafter provided to the Authority in a written notice from Developer or the mortgagee, provided that failure of the City or Execution Draft 26 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 the Authority to give any such notice shall not limit the City’s or the Authority’s ability to exercise any of its remedies hereunder. 5.3 Mortgagee’s Option to Cure Events of Default. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, the mortgagee under any Mortgage will have the right at its option, to cure or remedy such Event of Default within the cure periods set forth herein. 5.4 Rights of a Foreclosing Mortgagee. Except as provided in Section 5.6, an individual or entity who acquires title to all or a portion of the Minimum Improvements through the foreclosure of a mortgage or deed in lieu of foreclosure on such portion of the Project Area remains subject to each of the restrictions set forth in this Agreement and remains subject to all of the obligations of Developer, or any successor in interest to Developer, under the terms of this Agreement, but neither the purchaser at a foreclosure sale, the grantee under a deed in lieu of foreclosure, nor any subsequent transferee from a mortgagee shall have any personal liability for a breach of such obligations under this Agreement so long as: (a) The party acquiring title through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure observes all of the restrictions set forth in the Agreement; (b) The party who acquired title through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure does not undertake or permit any other party to undertake any Minimum Improvements on the portion of the Project Area it owns; (c) The City has no obligation to approve any plans for Minimum Improvements or a portion of the Minimum Improvements the foreclosing mortgagee (or mortgagee obtaining a deed in lieu of foreclosure) owns or to issue any related building permits. The purpose of this section is to permit a foreclosing lender (or mortgagee or purchaser obtaining a deed in lieu of foreclosure or a subsequent transferee) to hold title to the portion of the Project Area it acquires through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure, subject to, but without personal liability for the obligations under this Agreement, until it can sell the portion it holds to a third party who will assume the obligations of Developer under the terms of this Agreement and proceed with the construction of the Minimum Improvements pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. If, rather than passively holding title to the portion of the Project Area it acquires through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure, the foreclosing lender (or mortgagee obtaining a deed in lieu of foreclosure or subsequent transferee) or other purchaser at a foreclosure sale desires to construct the Minimum Improvements, the purchaser at the foreclosure sale must assume and perform each of the obligations of Developer, or the applicable successor to the interest of Developer, under this Agreement as to the portion of the Minimum Improvements subject to foreclosure. This section does not restrict the authority of the Authority to pursue its rights under any outstanding security, exercise remedies otherwise available under this Agreement or suspend the performance of the obligations of the Authority or Developer under this Agreement as otherwise allowed. The Authority agrees to reasonably cooperate with any foreclosing lender (or mortgagee obtaining a deed in lieu of foreclosure) or other purchaser at a foreclosure sale in pursuing the Minimum Improvements in accordance with this Agreement. Unless acting other than passively holding title as described above in this section, a lender or an independent third party that purchases at a foreclosure sale will have no liability for breach under this Agreement. 5.5 Events of Default Under Mortgage. Developer shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain an agreement from any mortgagee under a Mortgage that in the event Developer is in default under any Mortgage, the mortgagee will use commercially reasonable efforts, within 30 days after it becomes aware of any such default and prior to exercising any remedy available to it due to such default, Execution Draft 27 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 to notify the Authority in writing of (i) the fact of default; (ii) the elements of default; and (iii) the actions required to cure the default. Developer shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to obtain an agreement in any such Mortgage, that if, within the time period required by the Mortgage, the Authority cures any default under the Mortgage, the mortgagee will pursue none of its remedies under the Mortgage based on such default, provided that failure of Developer to obtain such an agreement from any such mortgagee shall not constitute a breach of this Agreement. 5.6 Subordination of Agreement. The City and the Authority will, upon the request of the holder of a Mortgage, execute and record a subordination agreement pursuant to which the City and the Authority agree that, upon a default by Developer under a Mortgage, the holder of the Mortgage may elect, in an instrument to be recorded in the Hennepin County land records and delivered to the City and the Authority before the commencement of proceedings to foreclose the Mortgage, to either (1) treat this Agreement as being subordinate to the lien of the Mortgage such that the foreclosure of the Mortgage and the failure to redeem from such foreclosure will extinguish and terminate this Agreement and the TIF Note will automatically be cancelled and rescinded; or (2) to treat this Agreement as having priority over the Mortgage in which case this Agreement and the TIF Note will survive the foreclosure of the Mortgage and this Agreement will be binding upon the holder of the Sheriff's Certificate issued in conjunction with the foreclosure of the Mortgage. If the holder of the Mortgage fails to notify the City and the Authority of its election under this Section 5.6 on or before the commencement of foreclosure proceedings, the holder of the Mortgage shall be deemed to have elected to treat this Agreement as being subordinate to the lien of the Mortgage such that the foreclosure of the Mortgage and the failure to redeem from such foreclosure will extinguish and terminate this Agreement and the TIF Note will automatically terminate. The City and Authority each further agree that if the holder of a Mortgage elects to treat this Agreement as having priority over the Mortgage, the City and Authority, upon the completion of the foreclosure without redemption, agree that the time for the completion of the Minimum Improvements is extended to a date 12 months following the expiration of all applicable redemption periods. Article VI Insurance and Indemnification 6.1 Insurance. (a) Developer shall obtain and continuously maintain insurance on the Minimum Improvements and, from time to time at the request of the Authority, furnish proof to the Authority that the premiums for such insurance have been paid and the insurance is in effect. The insurance coverage described below is the minimum insurance coverage that Developer must obtain and continuously maintain, provided that Developer shall obtain the insurance described in clause (i) below with respect to the Minimum Improvements prior to the Commencement of construction thereof and is only obligated to maintain the insurance described in clause (i) until Developer receives a Certificate of Completion: (i) Builder’s risk insurance, written on the so-called “Builder’s Risk- Completed Value Basis,” in an amount equal to 100% of the insurable value of the Minimum Improvements at the date of Completion, and with coverage available in non- reporting form on the so-called “all risk” form of policy. (ii) Comprehensive general liability insurance (including operations, contingent liability, operations of subcontractors, completed operations and contractual liability insurance) together with an Owner’s/Contractor’s Policy naming the Authority, and the City as an additional insured, with limits against bodily injury and property damage of not less than $5,000,000 for each occurrence (to accomplish the above-required limits, an umbrella excess liability policy may be used), written on an occurrence basis. Execution Draft 28 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 (iii) Workers compensation insurance, for employees of Developer if and to the extent required by Law. (b) All insurance required in this Article shall be obtained and continuously maintained by responsible insurance companies selected by Developer which are authorized under the laws of the State to assume the risks covered by such policies. If available on commercially reasonable terms, each policy must contain a provision that the insurer will not cancel nor modify the policy without giving written notice to the insured at least 30 days before the cancellation or modification becomes effective. Not less than 15 days prior to the expiration of any policy, Developer must renew the existing policy or replace the policy with another policy conforming to the provisions of this Article. In lieu of separate policies, Developer may maintain a single policy, blanket or umbrella policies, or a combination thereof, having the coverage required herein. 6.2 Indemnification. (a) Developer releases and covenants and agrees that the City Parties shall not be liable for and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City Parties against any loss or damage to property or any injury to or death of any person occurring at or about, or resulting from any defect in the Minimum Improvements constructed by Developer, except to the extent attributable to the negligence or intentional misconduct of any City Party. (b) Except to the extent of the negligence or intentional misconduct of any City Party, Developer shall indemnify the City Parties, now and forever, and further agrees to hold the aforesaid harmless from any claims, demands, suits, costs, expenses (including reasonable attorney’s fees), actions or other proceedings whatsoever by any person or entity whatsoever arising or purportedly arising from the actions or inactions of Developer (or other persons under its direction or control) under this Agreement, or the transactions contemplated hereby or the acquisition, construction, installation, ownership, and operation of the Minimum Improvements. Article VII Other Developer Covenants 7.1 Developer Reimbursement Obligations. Developer shall pay all reasonable out of pocket costs of the City and the Authority in connection with the Minimum Improvements and the TIF Assistance provided to Developer, including, but not limited, the costs and expenses of the City Consultants, the costs of the development and negotiation of this Agreement and any amendments or modifications to this Agreement, the development of the TIF Plan, the creation of the TIF District, the blight study of the existing buildings, fiscal analysis, legal fees, and all other costs and expenses related thereto. Sufficient monies must be provided to the Authority along with the request for TIF Assistance. These monies shall be held in escrow. Any unused monies shall be returned to Developer. These monies shall not bear interest. After the escrowed monies have been used, Developer shall pay such costs monthly upon presentation of invoices and other documentation of such costs, not more than 30 days after the request for payment is delivered to Developer. All such costs will be Qualified Redevelopment Costs pursuant to the TIF Pro Forma. 7.2 Maintenance and Operation of the Improvements. Developer shall, at all times during the term of this Agreement, maintain and operate the Minimum Improvements in a safe and secure way and in compliance with this Agreement and applicable Law. Developer shall pay all of the reasonable and necessary expenses of the operation and maintenance of the Minimum Improvements, including all premiums for insurance insuring against loss or damage thereto and adequate insurance against liability for injury to persons or property arising from the construction of the Minimum Improvements as required pursuant to this Agreement. During construction of the Minimum Improvements, Developer shall not Execution Draft 29 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 knowingly cause any person working in or attending the Minimum Improvements for any purpose, or any tenant of the Minimum Improvements, to be exposed to any hazardous or unsafe condition; provided that such party shall not be in Default hereunder if it has required the contractors employed to perform work on the Minimum Improvements to take such precautions as may be available to protect the persons in and around the Minimum Improvements from hazards arising from the work, and has further required each such contractor to obtain and maintain liability insurance protecting against liability to persons for injury arising from the work. The expenses of operation and maintenance of the Minimum Improvements shall be borne solely by Developer. After reconstruction of the Eden Avenue/Willson Road intersection, Developer shall be responsible for maintenance of the plaza and landscape area beginning at the back of finished curb. 7.3 Cooperation with Litigation. Developer shall reasonably cooperate with the Authority with respect to any litigation commenced by third parties with respect to the Project; however, this provision does not obligate Developer to incur costs, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement or elsewhere. 7.4 Condemnation, Damage, or Destruction. In the event that title to and possession of the Project or any material part thereof shall be taken in condemnation or by the exercise of the power of eminent domain by any governmental body or other person (except the Authority or the City) or the Project is damaged or destroyed, Developer shall, with reasonable promptness after such taking, notify the Authority as to the nature and extent of such damage or taking, as applicable. Upon receipt of any condemnation award or insurance proceeds Developer shall elect to either: (a) use the entire condemnation award or insurance proceeds to reconstruct the Project (or, in the event only a part of the Project has been taken or damaged, then to reconstruct such part) upon the remaining Property to the extent necessary to maintain and continue operations of Project for its intended purpose; or (b) in the event that the condemnation affects or taking or damage or destruction affects the Property but not the Project improvements thereon, retain, for the account of Developer, all of the condemnation award or insurance proceeds. 7.5 Business Subsidy Agreement. The Authority and Developer have determined that a business subsidy agreement within the meaning of the Minnesota Business Subsidy Act, Minnesota Statutes, Sections 116J.993 through 116J.995 is not required in accordance with the exception contained in the Minnesota Business Subsidy Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.993, subd. 3(17), because Developer’s investment in the purchase of the Minimum Improvements Area and site preparation thereon is 70% or more of the assessor’s current year’s estimated market value for the Minimum Improvements Area. 7.6 Developer/Authority Grant Applications. Developer and the Authority will cooperate in efforts to obtain available public grant funding to undertake the Project, including but not limited to grants from the Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund (ERF), Met Council Tax Base Revitalization Account (TBRA), Met Council Livable Communities Demonstration Account (LCDA), DEED Contamination Cleanup Grant, DEED Redevelopment Grant, and any other funding from metropolitan, state, county, and federal sources identified by the Authority or Developer as reasonably available. Costs of preparing the grant applications shall be borne by Developer. City staff shall have the final authority to review and submit the grant applications to the applicable agency. To the extent additional grant funds not reflected in the TIF Pro Forma are obtained, any such amounts shall be taken into consideration by the Authority when the Authority reviews the updated TIF Pro Formas and other information under Article III prior to issuing the TIF Note. Developer shall reasonably cooperate with the City and the Authority with Execution Draft 30 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 respect to the administration of any grants received from Hennepin County, Metropolitan Council, or State of Minnesota to support the construction of the Minimum Improvements. 7.7 Project Information. (a) Project Ownership. Developer shall provide the City and Authority with the final organizational structure for the ownership of the Project Area and the Minimum Improvements, and the identity of all parties with a beneficial interest in the Project. Developer shall confirm such organizational and ownership information at the time Developer submits the Go-Ahead Letter, and periodically thereafter in accordance with clause (b) below. For purposes of clarity, nothing in this paragraph will be deemed to replace, modify, or supersede the requirements and restrictions set forth in Article XIII. (b) Other Information. In addition to the other Project information required to be provided by Developer hereunder, Developer shall provide to the City and/or Authority such information regarding Developer and the Project as the City and/or Authority may reasonably request in writing from time to time in order for the City and Authority to monitor Developer’s progress on the Project, the prospects of the Project, and/or the status of Developer’s obligations hereunder, including without limitation the follow: (i) market studies and/or market data used by Developer to make decision regarding the financing, design, and development of the Project promptly upon request in writing and in no event later than two business days following such request and (ii) the status of Project ownership, organizational structure, financing, leasing, and sales, no more frequently than monthly, but otherwise promptly upon request in writing and in no event later than two business days following such request. The City and Authority will endeavor to treat all such information which Developer deems to be proprietary or trade secret information as nonpublic data under and in accordance with the Minnesota Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes chapter 13. Article VIII Transfer Limitations 8.1 Representation as to the Minimum Improvements. Developer represents to the City and the Authority that its undertakings under this Agreement are for the purpose of developing the Minimum Improvements and not for the purpose of speculation in land holding. Developer acknowledges that, in view of the importance of the Minimum Improvements to the general welfare of the City and the Authority, and the substantial financing and other public aids that have been made available by the City and the Authority for the purpose of making such Minimum Improvements possible, the qualifications and identity of Developer are of particular concern to the Authority. Developer further acknowledges that the City and the Authority are willing to enter into this Agreement with Developer because of the qualifications and identity of Developer. 8.2 Limitation on Transfers. (a) Until the Authority’s issuance of the Certificate of Completion, Developer shall not sell, assign, convey, lease or transfer in any other mode or manner any of its right, title, and interest in and to this Agreement, all or any part of the Project Area or the Minimum Improvements, without the express written approval of the Authority, provided that the consent of the Authority shall not be required for any of the following: (i) granting of a mortgage or other security interests in the Project Area as provided in Article V hereof; Execution Draft 31 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 (ii) leasing the Minimum Improvements in the normal course of business in a manner consistent with this Agreement and the City Approvals; or (iii) transfer to a Related Party, provided such Related Party, upon request of the Authority, executes an agreement in a form reasonably approved by the Authority pursuant to which such Related Party assumes and agrees to perform the obligations of Developer under this Agreement. (b) If the Authority’s consent to a transfer is required pursuant to this Section 8.2, the Authority shall be entitled to require, as conditions to its approval of any sale, assignment, conveyance, use or transfer of any rights, title, and interest in and to this Agreement, the Project Area or the Minimum Improvements that: (i) Any proposed transferee shall not be exempt from the payment of real estate taxes and shall have the qualifications and financial responsibility, as determined by the Authority, necessary and adequate to fulfill the obligations undertaken in this Agreement by Developer; (ii) Any proposed transferee, by instrument in writing satisfactory to the Authority and in form recordable among the land records shall, for itself and its successors and assigns, and expressly for the benefit of the Authority have expressly assumed all of the obligations of Developer (or such obligations of Developer as are applicable to the portion of the Minimum Improvements acquired) under this Agreement and agree to be subject to all the conditions and restrictions to which Developer is subject; (iii) Developer must submit all instruments and other legal documents involved in effecting transfer to the Authority; and (iv) Developer and the transferee must comply with such other conditions as the Authority may find desirable in order to achieve and safeguard the purposes of the HRA Act and TIF Act, this Agreement, and the Project; and (v) The transferee must demonstrate, in a manner satisfactory to the Authority, its ability to perform all assumed obligations in this Agreement. (c) In the absence of specific written agreement by the City and the Authority to the contrary, neither the transfer of the Minimum Improvements, or any portion thereof, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Completion for the Minimum Improvements or the City’s or the Authority’s consent to such a transfer will relieve Developer of its obligations under this Agreement. Article IX Events of Default and Remedies 9.1 Events of Default Defined. “Events of Default” under this Agreement include any one or more of the events listed in Sections 9.2 and 9.3. 9.2 Developer Events of Default. The following shall be Events of Default for Developer: (a) subject to Unavoidable Delays and Cure Rights, Developer’s failure to achieve Commencement and Completion of any aspect of the Minimum Improvements by the applicable “Default Date” set forth in Section 4.1; Execution Draft 32 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 (b) subject to Unavoidable Delays and Cure Rights, Developer shall Default in its obligations with respect to the construction of the Minimum Improvements (including the nature and the date for the completion of the various elements thereof), or shall abandon or substantially suspend construction work on the Minimum Improvements, and any such Default, violation, abandonment or suspension is not cured, ended or remedied within 30 days after written notice to do so; (c) there is, in violation of this Agreement, any conveyance, encumbrance or other transfer of the Project Area or any part thereof, and such violation is not cured within 30 days after written notice to do so; (d) subject to Unavoidable Delay and Cure Rights, failure by Developer to observe or perform any other covenant, condition, obligation or agreement on its part to be observed or performed under this Agreement, any of the City Easements, the Affordable Housing Restrictive Covenant, or the agreement regarding the Purchase Right, and the continuation of such failure for a period of 30 days after written notice of such failure from any party hereto; (e) if, prior to the delivery of the Certificate of Completion, Developer shall (i) file any petition in bankruptcy or for any reorganization, arrangement, composition, readjustment, liquidation, dissolution, or similar relief under the United States Bankruptcy Act of 1978, as amended or under any similar federal or State law; or (ii) make an assignment for the benefit of its creditors; or (iii) become insolvent or adjudicated a bankrupt; or if a petition or answer proposing the adjudication of Developer, as a bankrupt or its reorganization under any present or future Federal bankruptcy act or any similar Federal or State law shall be filed in any court and such petition or answer shall not be discharged or denied within 90 days after the filing thereof; or a receiver, trustee or liquidator of Developer, or of the Minimum Improvements, or part thereof, shall be appointed in any proceeding brought against Developer, and shall not be discharged within 90 days after such appointed, or if Developer shall consent to or acquiesce in such appointment. 9.3 City and Authority Events of Default. Subject to Cure Rights and events beyond the City’s and/or the Authority’s control, the failure of the City or the Authority to observe or perform any covenant, condition, obligation or agreement on its part to be observed or performed under this Agreement, and the continuation of such failure for a period of 30 days after written notice of such failure from any party hereto shall be an Event of Default for the City or the Authority. 9.4 Cure Rights. If a Default occurs under Section 9.2(a), (b) or (d) or under Section 9.3 which reasonably requires more than 30 days to cure, such Default shall not constitute an Event of Default, provided that the curing of the Default is promptly commenced upon receipt by the defaulting party of the written notice of the Default, and with due diligence is thereafter continuously prosecuted to completion and is completed within a reasonable period of time, and provided that the defaulting party keeps the non- defaulting party well informed at all times of its progress in curing the Default; provided, however in no event shall such additional cure period for any Default extend beyond 60 days. 9.5 Authority Remedies on Developer Events of Default. Whenever any Event of Default occurs by Developer, the Authority may take any one or more of the following actions: (a) terminate this Agreement; (b) the Authority may suspend interest accrual and/or withhold payments due under the TIF Note until Developer has cured the Default which gave rise to the Event of Default; Execution Draft 33 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 (c) suspend performance under this Agreement until it receives assurances from Developer or the holder of any Mortgage, deemed adequate by the Authority, that Developer or the holder of any Mortgage will cure the Event of Default and continue its performance under this Agreement, (d) withhold the Certificate of Completion where such Event of Default relates to Completion of the Minimum Improvements or the issuance of the Certificate of Completion; (e) take whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or desirable to the Authority to collect any payments due under this Agreement, or to enforce performance and observance of any obligation, agreement, or covenant of Developer under this Agreement; and (f) the Authority shall have all remedies available at law and in equity to enforce performance of this Agreement including a right to specific performance. 9.6 City Remedies on Developer Events of Default. Whenever any Event of Default of Developer occurs, the City may suspend performance of its obligations under this Agreement and take whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or desirable to the City to enforce performance and observance of any obligation, agreement, or covenant of Developer under this Agreement, including an action for specific performance. 9.7 Developer Remedies on City or Authority Events of Default. Whenever any Event of Default of the City or the Authority occurs, Developer, may take whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or desirable to enforce performance and observance of any obligation, agreement, or covenant of the City or the Authority under this Agreement, including an action for specific performance. 9.8 No Remedy Exclusive. No remedy herein conferred upon or reserved to the City, the Authority or Developer is intended to be exclusive of any other available remedy or remedies unless otherwise expressly stated, but each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given under this Agreement or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute. No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon any Default shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver thereof, but any such right and power may be exercised from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient. In order to entitle the Authority, the City or Developer to exercise any remedy reserved to it, it shall not be necessary to give notice, other than such notice as may be required in this Article X. 9.9 No Additional Waiver Implied by One Waiver. If any agreement contained in this Agreement should be breached by any party and thereafter waived by another party, such waiver shall be limited to the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive any other concurrent, previous or subsequent breach hereunder. 9.10 Reimbursement of Attorneys’ Fees. Whenever a Default occurs and the non-defaulting party shall employ attorneys or incur other expenses for the collection of payments due or to become due or for the enforcement of performance or observance of any obligation or agreement under this Agreement, the defaulting party shall, within 10 days of written demand by the non-defaulting party pay to such non- defaulting party the reasonable fees of such attorneys and such other expenses so incurred by non-defaulting party. In the event of any enforcement action hereunder following a Default, the prevailing party, in addition to other relief, shall be entitled to an award of attorney’s fees and costs. The City, Authority and Developer waive their right to a jury trial on the issues of who is the prevailing party and the reasonable amount of attorneys’ fees and costs to be awarded to the prevailing party. Those issues will be decided by the trial judge upon motion by one or both parties, such motion to be decided based on the record as of the end of the jury trial augmented only by the testimony and/or affidavits from the attorneys and their staff. The Execution Draft 34 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 parties agree that, subject to the trial judge’s discretion, the intent of this clause is to have all issues related to the award of attorneys’ fees and costs decided by the trial judge as quickly as practicable. Article X Additional Provisions 10.1 Conflicts of Interest. No member of the Board or other official of the Authority shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the TIF District or the Minimum Improvements, or any contract, agreement or other transaction contemplated to occur or be undertaken thereunder or with respect thereto, nor shall any such member of the governing body or other official participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects his or her personal interests or the interests of any corporation, partnership or association in which he or she is directly or indirectly interested. No member, official or employee of the City or the Authority shall be personally liable to the City or the Authority in the event of any Default or breach by Developer of any obligations under the terms of this Agreement. 10.2 Titles of Articles and Sections. Any titles of the several parts, Articles and Sections of the Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall be disregarded in construing or interpreting any of its provisions. 10.3 Notices and Demands. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, a notice, demand or other communication under this Agreement by any party to any other shall be in writing and shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is dispatched by reputable overnight courier, sent registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or delivered personally, and addressed to: Developer at: c/o Reuter Walton Development, LLC Attn: Nicholas Walton 4450 Excelsior Boulevard, Suite 400 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 with a copy to: The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company Attention: Real Estate Investment Department 720 East Wisconsin Avenue Milwaukee, WI 53202 The Authority at: Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota Attention: Executive Director 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 with a copy to: Dorsey & Whitney LLP Attention: Jay R. Lindgren 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 The City at: City of Edina Attention: City Manager 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 with a copy to: Dorsey & Whitney LLP Attention: Jay R. Lindgren Execution Draft 35 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address with respect to any such party as that party may, from time to time, designate in writing and forward to the other, as provided in this section. 10.4 Governing Law, Jurisdiction, Venue and Waiver of Trial by Jury. All matters, whether sounding in tort or in contract, relating to the validity, construction, performance, or enforcement of this Agreement shall be controlled by, interpreted and determined in accordance with the laws of the state of Minnesota without regard to its conflict and choice of law provisions. Any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be venued exclusively in Hennepin County District Court, Fourth Judicial District, state of Minnesota and shall not be removed therefrom to any other federal or state court. The Authority and Developer hereby consent to personal jurisdiction and venue in the foregoing court. The Authority and Developer hereby waive trial by jury for any litigation arising out of this Agreement. 10.5 Severability. If any term or provision of this Agreement is determined to be invalid or unenforceable under applicable Law, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby, and each remaining term or provision of this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by applicable Law. 10.6 Consents and Approvals. Whenever the terms “consent,” “approve,” or “approval” are used herein, they shall mean consent or approval in a party’s sole discretion, unless specifically provided otherwise. All consents or approvals must be delivered in writing in order to be effective. 10.7 Additional Documents. When reasonably requested to do so by another party, each party shall execute or cause to be executed any further documents as may be reasonably necessary or expedient and within their lawful obligation in order to consummate the transactions provided for in, and to carry out the purpose and intent of, this Agreement. 10.8 Limitation. All covenants, stipulations, promises, agreements and obligations of the Authority or Developer contained in this Agreement shall be deemed to be the covenants, stipulations, promises, agreements and obligations of the Authority and Developer, and not of any governing body member, officer, agent, servant, manager or employee of the Authority or Developer in the individual capacity thereof. 10.9 City/Authority Approval. Unless the City Council or the Board, as applicable, determines otherwise in its discretion, all approvals and other actions required of or taken by the Authority or the City shall be effective upon action by the Authorized Representative of the Authority or City, as applicable (or in either case his/her designee), unless (a) this Agreement explicitly provides for approval by the City Council or the Board of the Authority, (b) approval by the Council or Board is required by law or (c) the approval, in the opinion of the City Manager or the Executive Director, would result in a material change in the terms of this Agreement. 10.10 Superseding Effect. This Agreement reflects the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the items covered by this Agreement, and supersedes in all respects all prior agreements of the parties, whether written or otherwise, with respect to the items covered by this Agreement. 10.11 Relationship of Parties. Nothing in this Agreement is intended, or shall be construed, to create a partnership or joint venture among or between the parties hereto, and the rights and remedies of the parties hereto shall be strictly as set forth in this Agreement. Execution Draft 36 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 10.12 Survival of Terms. The following Sections will survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement: Section 6.1 [Insurance]; Section 6.2 [Indemnification]; Sections 9.5 through 9.7 [Remedies on Default] to the extent of any Event of Default arising prior to such termination or expiration; Section 10.3 [Notices and Demands]; Section 10.4 [Governing Law, Jurisdiction, Venue and Waiver of Trial by Jury]; and Section 10.18 [Limited Liability]. 10.13 Data Practices Act. Developer acknowledges that all of the data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Developer with regard to the performance of its duties under this Agreement are subject to the requirements of Chapter 13, Minnesota Statutes. 10.14 No Waiver of Governmental Immunity and Limitations on Liability. Nothing in this Agreement shall in any way affect or impair the City’s or Authority’s immunity or the immunity of the City’s and Authority’s employees, consultants and contractors, whether on account of official immunity, legislative immunity, statutory immunity, discretionary immunity or otherwise. Nothing in this Agreement shall in any way affect or impair the limitations on the City’s or Authority’s liability or the liability of the City’s and Authority’s employees, consultants and independent contractors. By entering into this Agreement, the Authority does not waive any rights, protections, or limitations as provided under law and equity for the Authority, or of their respective employees, consultants and contractors. 10.15 City and Authority Regulatory Authority. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit or modify the City’s or Authority’s regulatory authority. 10.16 Memorandum of Agreement. Neither party shall cause this Agreement to be recorded or filed in the real estate records of the County. However, Developer shall cause a memorandum of this Agreement to be so recorded or filed in the form attached as Exhibit F, and hereby incorporated herein by reference upon execution of this Agreement upon that portion of the Property owned by Developer. At the time of execution of this Agreement the parties hereto will also execute and acknowledge the Memorandum of Agreement. 10.17 Limited Liability. Notwithstanding anything to contrary provided in this Agreement, it is specifically understood and agreed, such agreement being the primary consideration for the execution of this Agreement by Developer, that (a) there should be absolutely no personal liability on the part of any director, officer, manager, member, employee or agent of Developer or the City or Authority with respect to any terms, covenants and conditions in this Agreement; (b) Developer and the Authority waive all claims, demands and causes of action against the other parties’ directors, officers, managers, members, employees and agents in any Event of Default, by either party, as the case may be, of any of the terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement to be performed by either party; and (c) Developer and the Authority, as the case may be, shall look solely to the assets of the other party for the satisfaction of each and every applicable remedy in the Event of Default by any party, as the case may be, of any of the terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement such exculpation of liability to be absolute and without any exception whatsoever. 10.18 Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and each and every term and condition hereof; provided, however, that if any date herein set forth for the performance of any obligations by Developer or the Authority or for the delivery of any instrument or notice as herein provided should not be on a business day, the compliance with such obligations or delivery shall be deemed acceptable on the next following business day. 10.19 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. Execution Draft 37 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 10.20 Amendments. This Agreement shall not be amended unless in writing and executed by the parties hereto. Developer shall be responsible for obtaining any necessary consent to an amendment to this Agreement from the Construction Lender or Permanent Lender, as applicable. 10.21 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be effective from the Effective Date above written until the earlier of (a) the date this Agreement is terminated pursuant to the terms and conditions hereof, (b) payment in full of the TIF Note, or (c) the date of termination of the TIF District. Upon termination, the parties agree to execute and record a document terminating this Agreement and providing for the release of the obligations under this Agreement. [SIGNATURES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGES] Execution Draft 38 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City, the Authority and Developer have caused this Agreement to be duly executed in their names and on their behalf, all on or as of the date first above written. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: __________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor By: __________________________________ Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _____________, 2021, by James B. Hovland and Scott H. Neal, the Mayor and City Manager, respectively, of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of the City of Edina. ______________________________________ Notary Public Execution Draft 39 Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) 4833-8228-6843\11 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: ______________________________ James B. Hovland, Chair By: ______________________________ James Pierce, Secretary STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _______________, 2021, by James B. Hovland and James Pierce, the Chair and Secretary, respectively, of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of said Authority. ______________________________________ Notary Public Execution Draft [Signature Page to Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue)] 4833-8228-6843\11 EDEN AVENUE GROUP, LLC By: Eden Avenue Partners, LLC, its Manager By: _________________________________________ Name: Nicholas Walton Its: Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of ________________, 2021, by Nicholas Walton, the Manager of Eden Avenue Partners, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, the Manager of Eden Avenue Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public A-1 4820-3049-8044\3 Exhibit A Legal Description of Project Area Tracts A and C, Registered Land Survey No. 1501, Hennepin County, Minnesota B-1 4891-1861-9392\1 Exhibit B Project Plans [See attached.] ':'16,19",19"21("1(&770+"((5&3 &&&&%,775$,/6,*1),%(5237,&%,780,1286%,780,1286:LOOVRQ5RDG(GHQ$YHQXH*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*URXS*5$3+,&/(*(1'&,367$1'$5'*5$<&21&5(7(%5220),1,6+('7<3785)*5$6662',55,*$7(' 6((63(& 3/$17,1*%('685)$&,1*52&.08/&+0,175$352&.&/($13/$17,1*%('685)$&,1*+$5':22'08/&+0,17<3&,3&2/25('&21&5(7( % &(06721( 025&+(//$*2/'&3&/ %5220),1,6+('7<36+257*5$6635$,5,(6(('0,;7%'&,3&2/25('&21&5(7( $ &(06721( +$5%250,67&3&/ %5220),1,6+('7<33('(67$/3$9(56<67(0:$86$87,/( 6721(<&5((.6& :;/'2*5813($*5$9(/&/($10,1'(37+7<3/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////.(<127(6758(1257+3/$11257+GArchitectureInterior DesignLandscape ArchitectureEngineeringBKVROUP222 North Second StreetLong & Kees Bldg Suite 101Minneapolis, MN 55401612.339.3752www.bkvgroup.com‹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rchitectureInterior DesignLandscape ArchitectureEngineeringBoarmanKroosVogelGroupInc.EOELicense NumberI hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professionalunder the laws of the State of Minnesota.BKVTB-30x42EngineerDateXX/XX/XXXX24440Michael J. St. Martin, PELOUCKS7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300Maple Grove, MN 55369763.424.5505www.loucksinc.comPLANNINGCIVIL ENGINEERINGLAND SURVEYINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREENVIRONMENTALLOUCKS PROJECT NO. 21081.00© 2016 BKV Group, Inc. EOESHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEDRAWN BYCHECKED BYCOMMISSION NUMBERISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTIONPROJECT TITLECONSULTANTSNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONCERTIFICATIONDATE4917 EDEN AVE.21081.0007/02/2021JBTMJSOWNER/DEVELOPER03/12/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN07/02/2021 SCHEMATIC DESIGN09/10/2021DESIGNDEVELOPMENT SET10/05/2021FINALDEVELOPMENT SETEXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES INTHE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THESTRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACEWIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIEDTHE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES.OWNER.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL WARNING:AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUNDGopher State One CallSITE PLANC2-1REQUIRED SURFACE ACCESSIBLE PARKING: xxx STALLS**REQUIRED MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES FOR 101-150 STALLSSURFACE ACCESSIBLE PARKING: xxx STALLSACCESSIBLE PARKINGOFF-STREET PARKING CALCULATIONSPROPOSED SURFACE PARKING PROVIDED: 37 STALLSSITE NOTES1. ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLEDIN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER THE DETAIL SHEET(S) AND STATE/LOCALJURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS.2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL BE PROVIDED PER CURRENT ADASTANDARDS AND LOCAL/STATE REQUIREMENTS.3. ALL CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.4. ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.5. TYPICAL FULL SIZED PARKING STALL IS 9' X 18' WITH A 24' WIDE TWO WAY DRIVE UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.6. ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 3.0' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. BITUMINOUS IMPREGNATED FIBER BOARD TO BE PLACED AT FULL DEPTH OF CONCRETEADJACENT TO EXISTING STRUCTURES AND BEHIND CURB ADJACENT TO DRIVEWAYS ANDSIDEWALKS.8. SEE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR SITE LIGHTING.CURRENT ZONING: xxxPROPOSED ZONING: xxxBUILDING SETBACK: xxxTOTAL PROPERTY AREA: 2.08 AC.AREA OF DISTURBANCE: 2.58 AC.EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA: 1.82 ACPROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 1.48 AC.SITE DATASITE PLAN LEGENDCONCRETE SIDEWALKBITUMINOUS PAVEMENTHEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTHEAVY-DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENTCONCRETE PAVEMENTSPECIALTY LANDSCAPE PAVINGNSCALE IN FEET020 40SCALE IN FEET020 40NN 8383$$''((-%(67$,5$3$(/(9$725$(/(9$725&(/(9$725%67$,5%3%83/2:(5/(9(/3$5.,1*3$$$$(/(&75,&$/ 0(&+30(&+(;+$86733%3$39(67,%8/(39(67,%8/(33    5$03:,'7+ 9(+,&/( '5,9($,6/(   '5,9($,6/(     '5,9($,6 /( 67$//    )&+26(%,%$$9(+,&/(5$03 .%%$$%%/%&%%'&(&&&'&%&$++**&&))&&%%$$$&$(%%%$&&&&$$          +%$%)'%25$03)')')')')')')')')')')')')')')''5,9($,6/( $$$  $5($:(//$$$'6   000$/,*1(1'2):$//:,7+'5,9($,6/( 00$,17(1$1&(33$/,*1$/,*1&(17(5:$//21&2/801000(&+$1,&$/(;+$867%)&&758(1257+3/$11257+GArchitectureInterior DesignLandscape ArchitectureEngineeringBKVROUP222 North Second StreetLong & Kees Bldg Suite 101Minneapolis, MN 55401612.339.3752www.bkvgroup.com‹%.9*URXS6+((7180%(56+((77,7/('5$:1%<&+(&.('%<&200,66,21180%(5352-(&77,7/(&2168/7$176&(57,),&$7,21%,0B(GHQ$YHB(GHQ$YHB$,BUYW307'('-5-'($/(9(/3)/2253/$1('(1$9($  /(9(/3)/2253/$1$5&+,7(&785$/.(<127(63$5.,1*727$/6/(9(/67$//7<3( &2817/(9(/3$&&(66,%/(&203$&767$1'$5'/(9(/3$&&(66,%/(&203$&767$1'$5'727$/67$//6)/2253/$1*(1(5$/127(6&216758&7),5(%/2&.,1*,1&21&($/(':$//63$&(63(5,%&5(48,5(0(176,)%/2&.,1*$1')$67(1,1*5(48,5(0(1762):$//$66(0%/</,67(',18/'(6,*16<67(09$5,(6)5206758&785$/'5$:,1*6$1'63(&,),&$7,2167+(:$//66+$//%(&216758&7('720((77+(025(5(675,&7,9(5(48,5(0(17,)$68%67,787,212)$:$//)/22525522)$66(0%/<,65(48(67('7+(&2175$&7256+$//3529,'($7(67('$66(0%/<0$7&+,1*25(;&((',1*5(48,5(0(1762)7+26(6+2:1,17+('2&80(176$//6+$)7:$//672&217,18286/<(;7(1')5207232))281'$7,2125)/225&(,/,1*$66(0%/<7281'(56,'(2))/22525522)6+($7+,1*6/$%25'(&.$%29($//67$,5$1'(/(9$725(1&/2685(672&217,18286/<(;7(1'7281'(56,'(2)522)'(&.'21273(1(75$7(67$,5$1'(/(9$725),5(5$7,1*0(0%5$1(3527(&7,2181/(666(59,1*67$,5$1'(/(9$725(1&/2685((;7(5,25:$//$66(0%/,(66+$//%($,57,*+7+$,5/,1(&5$&.6$1'60$//+2/(6$5(127$//2:('),1,6+)/225(/(9$7,21&+$1*($7'2256$1')/225,1*0$7(5,$/12772(;&((':,7+%(9(/('67(3$1':,7+9(57,&$/67(3812$//'225$1'3$66$*(23(1,1*621$&&(66,%/(5287(,1&20021$5($672%(&/($50,1,080:,7+'225,123(1326,7,21&20021$5($'225&/($5$1&(6$1'$3352$&+(63(5$33/,&$%/($&&(66,%,/,7<&2'(6'21276&$/('5$:,1*63529,'(%/2&.,1*$1'%$&.(56833257)25:$//$1'&(,/,1*02817('+$5':$5((48,30(17$1'$&&(6625,(65(029('(%5,6$1'&/($1$//$5($5(&(,9,1*6($/$176)250$;,080$'+(6,21$1'3(5)250$1&(3529,'($&217,182866($/$17-2,1%(7:((1',66,0,/$50$7(5,$/625&216758&7,215()(5726758&785$/'5$:,1*6)256+($5$1'%($5,1*:$//&216758&7,21$1'5(48,5(0(1765()(5726758&785$/'5$:,1*6)25&21&5(7($1'0$6215<:$//5(,1)25&,1*:22',1&217$&7:,7+&21&5(7(72%(35(6685(75($7(':22'86(02,6785(5(6,67$17*<3%'$7%$7+5220$1'72,/(752206:+(5(7:2',))(5(17),5(5(6,67,9(&216758&7,216,17(56(&77+(025(5(675,&7,9(6+$//%(&217,18286,668( '$7('(6&5,37,21 6'6(7 '(6,*1'(9(/230(176(7 ),1$/'(9(/230(173/$1 8383'1'1$$''((1-%(67$,5$3$(/(9$725$9(+,&/(5$03(/(9$725&(/(9$725%67$,5%3%      '5,9($,6/(   '5,9($,6/(   '1 '5,9($,6/(     '5,9($,6 /(     75$6+52203%,.(52203322/(48,30(1752203/2$',1*67$*,1*33(763$3833(5/(9(/3$5.,1*39$1$$$$'2*581 %8,/',1*$%29( '$6+('/,1( :$7(5522036(59,&((175<'1 72*$5$*( 9(67,%8/(33%333$3%3$3$9(67,%8/(33$333%3$33%9$1 //$,5,17$.( /3 $,5,17$.( /3 )3)3)3)3$$'5,9($,6/( .%%$$%%/%&%%'3&(&&&'&%&$++**&&))&&%%$$$&$(%%%$&&&&$$+%$0%$)')')')')')')'%29(+,&/(5$03)')')')'%8,/',1*$%29(725$03)')')')')')'$$$(;7(1762)75$)),&&2$7,1* +$7&+('$5($ 835(7$,1,1*:$//5()(572/$1'6&$3('1$$$$5($:(//  $/,*1$/,*1$/,*1ƒ0000$$$'60  %,.(5(3$,567$7,21(/(&75,&$/3$1(/60(&+$1,&$/(;+$867%)&& 758(1257+3/$11257+GArchitectureInterior DesignLandscape ArchitectureEngineeringBKVROUP222 North Second StreetLong & Kees Bldg Suite 101Minneapolis, MN 55401612.339.3752www.bkvgroup.com‹%.9*URXS6+((7180%(56+((77,7/('5$:1%<&+(&.('%<&200,66,21180%(5352-(&77,7/(&2168/7$176&(57,),&$7,21%,0B(GHQ$YHB(GHQ$YHB$,BUYW307'('-5-'($/(9(/3)/2253/$1('(1$9($5&+,7(&785$/.(<127(6$ &$%/(5$,/9(+,&/(%$55,(50,1+,*+6((6758&785$/$  /(9(/3)/2253/$13$5.,1*727$/6/(9(/67$//7<3( &2817/(9(/3$&&(66,%/(&203$&767$1'$5'/(9(/3$&&(66,%/(&203$&767$1'$5'727$/67$//6,668( '$7('(6&5,37,21 6'6(7 '(6,*1'(9(/230(176(7 ),1$/'(9(/230(173/$1 '183'18383$$67$,5$/$(/(9$725$0(&+ $67$,5%/%(/(&'$7$(/(9$725&(/(9$725%5(67$85$1759(67,%8/(3$5&(//2%%<&/8%52200(16/2&.(55220),71(66''((1-%(75$6+$$$$$$     /$5$$$%$$$$$$$$$&255,'25$$$6666666/%&%%<2*$66666    $$/%%%66$$6           5%6666666666'1 72*$5$*(      7<3 %:20(16/2&.(55220:25.5220&21)(5(1&(52202)),&(2)),&(&2:25.,1*81,7681,7$81,7$81,7%'81,7%'81,7$81,7%81,7$81,7%81,7%81,7$81,7% 7<3($81,7$81,7%81,7%81,7%81,76&255,'25&255,'25%&81,7$$%-$1,725&/26(781,76        81,76'$ƒ                                     $                                                              (4 (4.%%$$%%/%&%%'3&(&&&'&%&$&&&&%%$$$&$(%%%$&&&&$$+%$0%                                                           $$6(()25(1/$5*('/2%%< $0(1,7<$5($3/$1%%&$$                                     (4 (4            (4 (4(4 (4     (4 (4 (4 (4(4 (4(4 (4(4 (4(4 (4(4 (4    (4 (4     (4 (4     (4 (4     (4 (4     (4 (4     (4 (4(4 (4(4 (4          (4 (4        (4 (4(4 (4(4 (4   (4 (4          (4 (4                                                      (4(4(4(4(4(4    (4(4                  :(4(4 (4(4                  (4(4                                                                      (4(4 % % %   %0$,/5220&% $6(()25(1/$5*('&2857<$5'3/$1 6       $      (4 (4&'      (4(4   $$$$$5($:(//3J3J$$$'60(/(9/2%%<(/(9/2%%<$$9&/26(7%)&&                                           758(1257+3/$11257+GArchitectureInterior DesignLandscape ArchitectureEngineeringBKVROUP222 North Second StreetLong & Kees Bldg Suite 101Minneapolis, MN 55401612.339.3752www.bkvgroup.com‹%.9*URXS6+((7180%(56+((77,7/('5$:1%<&+(&.('%<&200,66,21180%(5352-(&77,7/(&2168/7$176&(57,),&$7,21%,0B(GHQ$YHB(GHQ$YHB$,BUYW307'('-5-'($/(9(/)/2253/$1('(1$9($5&+,7(&785$/.(<127(6$  /(9(/)/2253/$1,668( '$7('(6&5,37,21 6'6(7 '(6,*1'(9(/230(176(7 ),1$/'(9(/230(173/$1 '1'183'183'1$$67$,5$/$(/(9$725$0(&+ $67$,5%/%(/(9$725&75$6+23(172'5,9(%(/2:23(172/2%%<%(/2:*$0(5220''((1-%((/(&'$7$$$$$$$287'225'(&./$/%&255,'25&255,'25$$$$$$$$$$$      66%$$6681,7$81,7%81,7$81,7$81,7%81,7%81,7%81,7$81,7%81,7%'81,7681,7681,7681,7681,7%'81,7%81,7%81,7$81,7%81,7%81,7$81,7%'81,7$81,7%81,7$81,7% 7<3($81,7$81,7%'   81,7$  66$$.%%$$%%/%&%%'3&(&&&'&%&$&&&&%%$$$&$(%%%$&&&&$$++%$0%$6(()25(1/$5*('$0(1,7<$5($3/$1 6$$$                (4(4                    *2/)6,08/$7250(&+(/(9$725%&255,'25     (4(4                              666666(4(4(4(4  (4(4                       (4(4     (4 (4$$$$$$$'60$6(()257<3,&$/',0(16,216$1'$1127$7,21(/(9/2%%<(/(9/2%%<$ %)&&758(1257+3/$11257+GArchitectureInterior DesignLandscape ArchitectureEngineeringBKVROUP222 North Second StreetLong & Kees Bldg Suite 101Minneapolis, MN 55401612.339.3752www.bkvgroup.com‹%.9*URXS6+((7180%(56+((77,7/('5$:1%<&+(&.('%<&200,66,21180%(5352-(&77,7/(&2168/7$176&(57,),&$7,21%,0B(GHQ$YHB(GHQ$YHB$,BUYW307'('-5-'($/(9(/)/2253/$1('(1$9($5&+,7(&785$/.(<127(6$  /(9(/)/2253/$1,668( '$7('(6&5,37,21 6'6(7 '(6,*1'(9(/230(176(7 ),1$/'(9(/230(173/$1 8383'1'167$,5$/$(/(9$725$0(&+ $67$,5%/%(/(9$725&(/(9$725%0(&+ %75$6+1(/(&'$7$$$$$$$/$/%&255,'25$$$$$$$$$$$6$81,7%'81,7$81,7%81,7$81,7$81,7%'81,7$81,7%81,7%81,7$81,7%81,7$81,7%81,7%'81,7681,76681,7681,7681,7%81,7%81,7$81,7%81,7$81,7%'81,7%81,7$ 7<3($81,7%81,7$81,7%'81,7%'81,7$81,7%  $$                                                                                                            &&&&&+%$$                                                                                                         $$(4 (4                (4 (4(4 (4       (4 (4(4 (4(4 (4     (4 (4(4 (4 (4 (4(4 (4     (4 (4          (4(4  (4(4    (4 (4                     (4 (4(4 (4(4 (4     (4 (4          (4 (4(4 (4     (4 (4     (4 (4           (4(4   (4(4(4(4             (4 (4   (4 (4          (4(4     (4 (4     (4 (4                    (4 (4(4 (4          (4(4              (4(4        (4(4   (4 (4                             (4(4      $$$$6(/(9/2%%<(/(9/2%%<)3   %)&&758(1257+3/$11257+GArchitectureInterior DesignLandscape ArchitectureEngineeringBKVROUP222 North Second StreetLong & Kees Bldg Suite 101Minneapolis, MN 55401612.339.3752www.bkvgroup.com‹%.9*URXS6+((7180%(56+((77,7/('5$:1%<&+(&.('%<&200,66,21180%(5352-(&77,7/(&2168/7$176&(57,),&$7,21%,0B(GHQ$YHB(GHQ$YHB$,BUYW307'('-5-'($/(9(/)/2253/$1('(1$9($5&+,7(&785$/.(<127(6$  /(9(/)/2253/$1,668( '$7('(6&5,37,21 6'6(7 '(6,*1'(9(/230(176(7 ),1$/'(9(/230(173/$1 '1'183831$$$$$$75$6+(/(&'$7$0(&+%67$,5%/%(/(9$725&(/(9$725'0(&+ $(/(9$725$67$,5$/$/%/$&255,'25$$$$$$$$$$$$81,7%'81,7%'81,7$81,7$81,7%81,7$81,7%81,7$81,7$81,7%81,7$81,7%81,7%'81,7%81,7681,7681,7681,7681,7%'81,7$81,7%81,7$81,7%81,7$81,7%'81,73+381,7%81,7%81,7$81,7%81,7%&&&&&+%$$$$$$$                    6$6(()257<3,&$/',0(16,216$1'$1127$7,21(/(9/2%%<(/(9/2%%<%)&& 758(1257+3/$11257+GArchitectureInterior DesignLandscape ArchitectureEngineeringBKVROUP222 North Second StreetLong & Kees Bldg Suite 101Minneapolis, MN 55401612.339.3752www.bkvgroup.com‹%.9*URXS6+((7180%(56+((77,7/('5$:1%<&+(&.('%<&200,66,21180%(5352-(&77,7/(&2168/7$176&(57,),&$7,21%,0B(GHQ$YHB(GHQ$YHB$,BUYW307'('-5-'($/(9(/)/2253/$1('(1$9($5&+,7(&785$/.(<127(6$  /(9(/)/2253/$1,668( '$7('(6&5,37,21 6'6(7 '(6,*1'(9(/230(176(7 ),1$/'(9(/230(173/$1 1$$$$$$75$6+(/(&'$7$0(&+ %67$,5%/%(/(9$725&(/(9$725'0(&+ $(/(9$725$67$,5$/$/%/$&255,'25&255,'25$$$$$$$$$$$$&&&&&+%$81,7%'81,7$81,7$81,7%81,7%81,7%'81,7$81,7%81,7$81,7%81,7$81,7%81,7681,7681,7681,7681,7%81,7$81,7%81,7%81,73+381,7$81,7%81,7$81,7%81,7$81,7%'81,7%'81,7%81,7%'81,7$$$$$$$6$6(()257<3,&$/',0(16,216$1'$1127$7,21(/(9/2%%<(/(9/2%%<%)&&758(1257+3/$11257+GArchitectureInterior DesignLandscape ArchitectureEngineeringBKVROUP222 North Second StreetLong & Kees Bldg Suite 101Minneapolis, MN 55401612.339.3752www.bkvgroup.com‹%.9*URXS6+((7180%(56+((77,7/('5$:1%<&+(&.('%<&200,66,21180%(5352-(&77,7/(&2168/7$176&(57,),&$7,21%,0B(GHQ$YHB(GHQ$YHB$,BUYW307'('-5-'($/(9(/)/2253/$1('(1$9($5&+,7(&785$/.(<127(6$  /(9(/)/2253/$1,668( '$7('(6&5,37,21 6'6(7 '(6,*1'(9(/230(176(7 ),1$/'(9(/230(173/$1 831$$$$$$75$6+(/(&'$7$0(&+ %67$,5%/%(/(9$725&(/(9$725'67$,5$/$(/(9$725$0(&+ $/%&255,'25&255,'25/$$$$$$$$$$$$$&&&&&+%$81,7%'81,7%'81,7$81,7$81,7%81,7$81,7%81,7$81,7%81,7%81,7681,7681,7%81,7681,7681,7%81,7%81,73+381,7$81,7%81,7$81,7%81,7$81,7$81,7%81,7$81,7%'81,7%81,7%'81,7%'81,7$$$$$$$6$6(()257<3,&$/',0(16,216$1'$1127$7,21(/(9/2%%<(/(9/2%%<%)&&758(1257+3/$11257+GArchitectureInterior DesignLandscape ArchitectureEngineeringBKVROUP222 North Second StreetLong & Kees Bldg Suite 101Minneapolis, MN 55401612.339.3752www.bkvgroup.com‹%.9*URXS6+((7180%(56+((77,7/('5$:1%<&+(&.('%<&200,66,21180%(5352-(&77,7/(&2168/7$176&(57,),&$7,21%,0B(GHQ$YHB(GHQ$YHB$,BUYW307'('-5-'($/(9(/)/2253/$1('(1$9($  /(9(/)/2253/$1$5&+,7(&785$/.(<127(6,668( '$7('(6&5,37,21 '(6,*1'(9(/230(176(7 ),1$/'(9(/230(173/$1 '1'1838367$,5$/$(/(9$725$0(&+ $67$,5%/%(/(9$725&(/(9$725%35,9$7(',1,1*3$57<522075$6+1(/(&'$7$$$$$$$287'225'(&./%/$&255,'2567$,5'/'$$$$$$$$$$$$$0(1 65(675220:20(1 65(6752200(&+ %81,73+381,73+381,73+381,7%81,7%'81,73+381,7%'81,7$81,7%81,7$81,7%81,73+7<3($381,73+381,7$81,7%81,7%81,7681,7681,7%81,7%81,7%81,7$$&&&&&+%$$6(()25(1/$5*('$0(1,7<$5($3/$1$  $$                                                                       (4(4       (4(4                                     (4(4(4(4      $$$$  6$6(()257<3,&$/',0(16,216$1'$1127$7,21(/(9/2%%<(/(9/2%%<$$$$$$$$$$$$)7$$$$$$$$$/'$% $%)&&5'   5'   5'   5'   5'   5'   5'   5'   5'   5'   5'   5'   5'   5'   5'   5'   5'   5'   5'    5'  758(1257+3/$11257+GArchitectureInterior DesignLandscape ArchitectureEngineeringBKVROUP222 North Second StreetLong & Kees Bldg Suite 101Minneapolis, MN 55401612.339.3752www.bkvgroup.com‹%.9*URXS6+((7180%(56+((77,7/('5$:1%<&+(&.('%<&200,66,21180%(5352-(&77,7/(&2168/7$176&(57,),&$7,21%,0B(GHQ$YHB(GHQ$YHB$,BUYW307'('-5-'($/(9(/)/2253/$1('(1$9($5&+,7(&785$/.(<127(6$  /(9(/)/2253/$1,668( '$7('(6&5,37,21 6'6(7 '(6,*1'(9(/230(176(7 ),1$/'(9(/230(173/$1 ':113+27292/7$,&=21( 62/$55($'< $$$$(/(929(5581*$5'(13/2760(&+81,75(67$85$179(17,1*0(&+81,7522)+$7&+&225',1$7(522)$1&+25/$<2876:,7+)8785(62/$53$1(//$<2875'5*8$5'5$,/$7:$/.:$<5%&225',1$7(522)$1&+25/$<2876:,7+*$5'(13/27'(6,*1522)'5$,1$1'29(5)/2:'5$,1 7<3 $&&&&+%$$75$6+&+87(9(17,1*                                     (/(929(5581$$6%)&&758(1257+3/$11257+GArchitectureInterior DesignLandscape ArchitectureEngineeringBKVROUP222 North Second StreetLong & Kees Bldg Suite 101Minneapolis, MN 55401612.339.3752www.bkvgroup.com‹%.9*URXS6+((7180%(56+((77,7/('5$:1%<&+(&.('%<&200,66,21180%(5352-(&77,7/(&2168/7$176&(57,),&$7,21%,0B(GHQ$YHB(GHQ$YHB$,BUYW307'('-5-'($522)3/$1('(1$9($  522)$5&+,7(&785$/.(<127(6522)3/$1*(1(5$/127(65()(572$5&+,7(&785$/)/2253/$16)2529(5$//',0(16,216522)6/23(6$5(,1',&$7(':,7+$552:632,17,1*,17+('2:1:$5'6/23(',5(&7,217<3,&$/522)6/23(6 6758&785( $5(,1&+3(5)22781/(66127('27+(5:,6(522),168/$7,21$1'&5,&.(766+$//%(7$3(5('72'5$,1$7,1&+3(5)22781/(66127('27+(5:,6(522),168/$7,2129(56/23('522)6758&785(6+$//%($&2167$177+,&.1(66720((729(5$//0,1,08059$/8(5(48,5('$6'(7$,/('216+((7$:,7+7+((;&(37,212)$5($6:,7+7$3(5(',168/$7,21&5,&.(76$1'25522)'5$,16,168/$7,217+,&.1(66$7522)'5$,166+$//%($0,1,080,168/$7,217+,&.1(66127('213/$165(35(6(176$'',7,21$/,168/$7,217+,&.1(66%(<21'0,1,08059$/8(7+,&.1(665(48,5(')257+(522)$66(0%/<&225',1$7($//522)3(1(75$7,216$1'&85%65(/$7('72522)02817('(48,30(17:,7+0(&+$1,&$/3/80%,1*(/(&75,&$/$1'27+(575$'(6127$//3(1(75$7,216$1'522)02817(',7(060$<%(,1',&$7('217+,6'5$:,1*,167$//&5,&.(76:+(5(1(('('726+(':$7(5$:$<)520(48,30(17&85%62527+(5522)02817(',7(066/23(&5,&.(76$0,1,0802),1&+3(5)227$7$//522)7230(&+$1,&$/(48,30(17&85%63529,'()8//'(37+,168/7$7,21,16,'(2)522)&85%6$1':5$36$5281'6833/<$1'5(7851'8&76$67+(13(1(75$7(7+(522)6758&785(9(5,)</2&$7,212)$//6758&785(&20321(176%(/2:522)'5$,1/2&$7,21635,2572,167$//$7,21,668( '$7('(6&5,37,21 6'6(7 '(6,*1'(9(/230(176(7 ),1$/'(9(/230(173/$155%&225',1$7(522)$1&+25/$<2876:,7+*$5'(13/27'(6,*1    (/(929(5581 /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/  522)  /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/          $$FSDG-1TBR-1STN-1?::::::6 666:::::66:::::::::::$($($($(FSDG-1$(5%((((( ((((((((((((((::(::$($(FBR-1$(::::(:(::$(::::: :::::::::: ::::: ::::: ::::: :::::$($($($(/(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/  522)  /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/          ::::66666$(6: :((((((((( (((((((((:(5$$$$$$FBR-1$(6$$(6(6::6(66666666666::::"#67$,5#67$,5TBR-1FSDG-1$($(::::: ::::::::::::::::::::FSDG-1STN-1$($(6:::::$($((;7(5,250$7(5,$//(*(1'FBR-1FACE BRICKSTN-1STONE MASONRYFSDG-1CEMENT BOARD SIDING AND TRIMDARK GREY U.N.ODCMU-1DECORATIVE CONCRETE MASONRY UNITMP-1METAL PANEL - COPPER FINISHMP-2METAL PANEL CEILINGS - COPPER FINISHFSDG-2 FIBER CEMENT PANEL - LIGHT BUFFMP-3METAL PANEL - DARK GRAY FINISH*/(1*$5< 6$63(17(;785(9(/2856,=(87,/,7<67$&.,1*5811,1*%21'.$627$6721( 1$785$/&2/257(;785(7%'6,=(7%'67$&.,1*9$5,286-$0(6+$5',(9(57,&$/3$1(/6<67(035(),1,6+('3$,17 6:,52125(7(;785(60227+-$0(6+$5',(9(57,&$/3$1(/6<67(035(),1,6+('3$,177(;785(60227+12786('$0&21&087(;785(63/,7)$&(6,=(;67$&.,1*5811,1*%21'&(175,$,:$&2/25;/ &233(50(7$//,& 35(),1,6+('3$,177(;785(60227+$/7(51$7(),5(6721('(/7$&21&($/(')$67(1(53$1(/7,1&(,/,1*;35(66 /,1&2/1&233(57,/(&260232/,7,$1 ; &(175,$,:$&2/25&+$5&2$/*5$<35(),1,6+('3$,177(;785(60227+$/7(51$7(),5(6721('(/7$&21&($/(')$67(1(53$1(/TBR-1THIN BRICK*/(1*$5< 6$63(17(;785(9(/2856,=(87,/,7<67$&.,1*5811,1*%21'GArchitectureInterior DesignLandscape ArchitectureEngineeringBKVROUP222 North Second StreetLong & Kees Bldg Suite 101Minneapolis, MN 55401612.339.3752www.bkvgroup.com‹%.9*URXS6+((7180%(56+((77,7/('5$:1%<&+(&.('%<&200,66,21180%(5352-(&77,7/(&2168/7$176&(57,),&$7,21%,0B(GHQ$YHB(GHQ$YHB$,BUYW$0%0=-'($(;7(5,25(/(9$7,216('(1$9((;7(5,25(/(9$7,21.(<127(6$( 35(),1,6+('0(7$/5$,/,1*$( 35(),1,6+('0(7$/%$/&21<$( 35(),1,6+('0(7$/&$123< %$6,62)'(6,*10$3(6 &2/25720$7&+03$( 35(),1,6+('0(7$/&23,1*&2/25720$7&+),%(5&(0(173$1(/$( 0$*,&3$&./289(56&2/25720$7&+$'-$&(17),%(5&(0(173$1(/$( 35(),1,6+('0(7$/&$123< %$6,62)'(6,*10$3(6 &2/25720$7&+03$//7+)/225&$123,(672%('('8&7$/7(51$7($( %5,&.62/',(5&2856,1*$( 0(&+$1,&$//289(5&2/257%'$( 35(),1,6+('0(7$/&23,1*&2/25720$7&+%5,&.$( :$//02817('/,*+7),;785($( ),%(5&(0(17'(7$,/,1*5()(572(1/$5*('(/(9$7,21621$$  1257+(/(9$7,21$  1257+(/(9$7,21(;7(5,25(/(9$7,21*(1(5$/127(63529,'(&21752/-2,176)25$//&/$'',1*0$7(5,$/6$63(5352'8&70$18)$&785(55(&200(1'$7,216/2&$7(7+(0$7,17(5,25&251(56:+(5(3266,%/(68%0,7&21752/-2,17$1'(;3$16,21-2,17/$<2876)255(9,(:$1'$33529$/7(50,1$7(&/$'',1*0$7(5,$/6$7*5$'(:,7+0,1,080',67$1&(2))7+(*5281'685)$&($63(5352'8&70$18)$&785(55(&200(1'$7,21681/(6627+(5:,6('(7$,/('217+('5$:,1*63529,'(0$6215</('*(60,1,080%(/2:),1,6+*5$'(:+(5(0$6215<9(1((52&&856213(5,0(7(52)%8,/',1*3529,'(0,1,080 &/($5$1&()520(;+$867/289(56723523(57</,1(6$1'7223(5$%/(23(1,1*6$1'0,1,080 &/($5$1&(%(7:((1(;+$867$1'$,5,17$.(/289(56$63(5$33/,&$%/(,17(51$7,21$/0(&+$1,&$/&2'(63529,'(0,1,080 &/($5$1&()520*(1(5$725)/8(287/(7723523(57</,1(6$1' 7223(5$%/(23(1,1*6$1'0,1,080 &/($5$1&($%29($'-2,1,1**5$'($63(5$33/,&$%/(,17(51$7,21$/0(&+$1,&$/&2'(63529,'(0,1,080 &/($5$1&()5203$5.,1**$5$*((;+$867/289(5723523(57</,1(6$1' 7223(5$%/(23(1,1*6$1'0,1,080 &/($5$1&($%29($'-2,1,1**5$'($63(5$33/,&$%/(,17(51$7,21$/0(&+$1&$/&2'(6,668( '$7('(6&5,37,21 6'6(7 '(6,*1'(9(/230(176(7 ),1$/'(9(/230(173/$1 3(50,76(7 /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/3  /(9(/  /(9(/  522)  /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/           :::::: : : :: :::: :::: :: : : : ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::6:FSDG-1TBR-1$($($(STN-1FSDG-1$(DCMU-13$3$(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((($($($($$$$FBR-1:::::::(:::::::::: ::::::6 :66666::($: :$(((:::::::$($(/(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/  522)  /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/          ::::66:::::::::::::::::::::::::FBR-1STN-1MP-1$($($($($($FSDG-1FSDG-1$(6666665$((((((((((($($TBR-1$(:::::::::66666 6666666 6 66666666:::::$($((::($($($(/(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/  522)  /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/          ::STN-1$($(6$($(TBR-1:::::6::::FBR-1FSDG-1$($($(/(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/  522)  /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/          ::FSDG-1TBR-1$($($($(:::: :::::81,76FBR-1STN-1$($($($((;7(5,250$7(5,$//(*(1'FBR-1 FACE BRICKSTN-1 STONE MASONRYFSDG-1CEMENT BOARD SIDING AND TRIMDARK GREY U.N.ODCMU-1 DECORATIVE CONCRETE MASONRY UNITMP-1 METAL PANEL - COPPER FINISHMP-2 METAL PANEL CEILINGS - COPPER FINISHFSDG-2 FIBER CEMENT PANEL - LIGHT BUFFMP-3 METAL PANEL - DARK GRAY FINISH*/(1*$5< 6$63(17(;785(9(/2856,=(87,/,7<67$&.,1*5811,1*%21'.$627$6721( 1$785$/&2/257(;785(7%'6,=(7%'67$&.,1*9$5,286-$0(6+$5',(9(57,&$/3$1(/6<67(035(),1,6+('3$,17 6:,52125(7(;785(60227+-$0(6+$5',(9(57,&$/3$1(/6<67(035(),1,6+('3$,177(;785(60227+12786('$0&21&087(;785(63/,7)$&(6,=(;67$&.,1*5811,1*%21'&(175,$,:$&2/25;/ &233(50(7$//,& 35(),1,6+('3$,177(;785(60227+$/7(51$7(),5(6721('(/7$&21&($/(')$67(1(53$1(/7,1&(,/,1*;35(66 /,1&2/1&233(57,/(&260232/,7,$1 ; &(175,$,:$&2/25&+$5&2$/*5$<35(),1,6+('3$,177(;785(60227+$/7(51$7(),5(6721('(/7$&21&($/(')$67(1(53$1(/TBR-1 THIN BRICK*/(1*$5< 6$63(17(;785(9(/2856,=(87,/,7<67$&.,1*5811,1*%21'GArchitectureInterior DesignLandscape ArchitectureEngineeringBKVROUP222 North Second StreetLong & Kees Bldg Suite 101Minneapolis, MN 55401612.339.3752www.bkvgroup.com‹%.9*URXS6+((7180%(56+((77,7/('5$:1%<&+(&.('%<&200,66,21180%(5352-(&77,7/(&2168/7$176&(57,),&$7,21%,0B(GHQ$YHB(GHQ$YHB$,BUYW$0%0=-'($(;7(5,25(/(9$7,216('(1$9((;7(5,25(/(9$7,21.(<127(6$( 35(),1,6+('0(7$/5$,/,1*$( 35(),1,6+('0(7$/%$/&21<$( 35(),1,6+('0(7$/&$123< %$6,62)'(6,*10$3(6 &2/25720$7&+03$( 35(),1,6+('0(7$/&23,1*&2/25720$7&+),%(5&(0(173$1(/$( 0$*,&3$&./289(56&2/25720$7&+$'-$&(17),%(5&(0(173$1(/$( ,168/$7('6(&7,21$/29(5+($'*$5$*('225&2/25720$7&+:,1'2:)5$0($( ),5(75($7('/80%(53(5*2/$$( 35(),1,6+('0(7$/&$123< %$6,62)'(6,*10$3(6 &2/25720$7&+03$//7+)/225&$123,(672%('('8&7$/7(51$7($( %5,&.62/',(5&2856,1*$( 0(&+$1,&$//289(5&2/257%'$( 35(),1,6+('0(7$/&23,1*&2/25720$7&+%5,&.$( :$//02817('/,*+7),;785($( %5,&.'(7$,/,1*5()(572(1/$5*('(/(9$7,21621$$( ),%(5&(0(17'(7$,/,1*5()(572(1/$5*('(/(9$7,21621$$  6287+(/(9$7,21$  :(67(/(9$7,21$  :(67&2857<$5'1257+(/(9$7,21$  :(67&2857<$5'6287+(/(9$7,21,668( '$7('(6&5,37,21 6'6(7 '(6,*1'(9(/230(176(7 ),1$/'(9(/230(173/$1 3(50,76(7 /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/  522)  /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/          $::::::::::::::::::::::FSDG-1$($(STN-1((((((( ((((((($($($(TBR-1$$:::::: : ::::::6:::::::::: ::::::::::FBR-1$(6$($(/(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/  522)  /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/          ::6::: :::::::::6:::::FSDG-1TBR-1STN-1$(FSDG-1:/%$(((($$($($((((FBR-1$$(::::::(((:::: :::: ::::(((:::::::6:: :::::$($($($(/(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/  522)  /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/          STN-1FSDG-1MP-1$(FSDG-16666666666666 66666666(;7(5,250$7(5,$//(*(1'FBR-1 FACE BRICKSTN-1 STONE MASONRYFSDG-1CEMENT BOARD SIDING AND TRIMDARK GREY U.N.ODCMU-1 DECORATIVE CONCRETE MASONRY UNITMP-1 METAL PANEL - COPPER FINISHMP-2 METAL PANEL CEILINGS - COPPER FINISHFSDG-2 FIBER CEMENT PANEL - LIGHT BUFFMP-3 METAL PANEL - DARK GRAY FINISH*/(1*$5< 6$63(17(;785(9(/2856,=(87,/,7<67$&.,1*5811,1*%21'.$627$6721( 1$785$/&2/257(;785(7%'6,=(7%'67$&.,1*9$5,286-$0(6+$5',(9(57,&$/3$1(/6<67(035(),1,6+('3$,17 6:,52125(7(;785(60227+-$0(6+$5',(9(57,&$/3$1(/6<67(035(),1,6+('3$,177(;785(60227+12786('$0&21&087(;785(63/,7)$&(6,=(;67$&.,1*5811,1*%21'&(175,$,:$&2/25;/ &233(50(7$//,& 35(),1,6+('3$,177(;785(60227+$/7(51$7(),5(6721('(/7$&21&($/(')$67(1(53$1(/7,1&(,/,1*;35(66 /,1&2/1&233(57,/(&260232/,7,$1 ; &(175,$,:$&2/25&+$5&2$/*5$<35(),1,6+('3$,177(;785(60227+$/7(51$7(),5(6721('(/7$&21&($/(')$67(1(53$1(/TBR-1 THIN BRICK*/(1*$5< 6$63(17(;785(9(/2856,=(87,/,7<67$&.,1*5811,1*%21'GArchitectureInterior DesignLandscape ArchitectureEngineeringBKVROUP222 North Second StreetLong & Kees Bldg Suite 101Minneapolis, MN 55401612.339.3752www.bkvgroup.com‹%.9*URXS6+((7180%(56+((77,7/('5$:1%<&+(&.('%<&200,66,21180%(5352-(&77,7/(&2168/7$176&(57,),&$7,21%,0B(GHQ$YHB(GHQ$YHB$,BUYW$0%0=-'($(;7(5,25(/(9$7,216('(1$9((;7(5,25(/(9$7,21.(<127(6$( 35(),1,6+('0(7$/5$,/,1*$( 35(),1,6+('0(7$/%$/&21<$( 35(),1,6+('0(7$/&23,1*&2/25720$7&+),%(5&(0(173$1(/$( 35(),1,6+('0(7$/&23,1*&2/25720$7&+0(7$/3$1(/$( 0$*,&3$&./289(56&2/25720$7&+$'-$&(17),%(5&(0(173$1(/$( %5,&.62/',(5&2856,1*$( 35(),1,6+('0(7$/&23,1*&2/25720$7&+%5,&.$( :$//02817('/,*+7),;785($( ),%(5&(0(17'(7$,/,1*5()(572(1/$5*('(/(9$7,21621$$  &2857<$5'1257+(/(9$7,21$  &2857<$5'1257+(/(9$7,21$  &2857<$5':(67(/(9$7,21,668( '$7('(6&5,37,21 6'6(7 '(6,*1'(9(/230(176(7 ),1$/'(9(/230(173/$1 3(50,76(7 /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/  522)  /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/          ::::::: ::::::: : ::6 :::::::: :: ::6: :::::::::: :::: ::::::::::: :::: :::: : : : :: : :::: ::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::: :::: :::::::::::: :::::::FSDG-1TBR-1STN-1$($(:(((((( ((((((( ((((((( ((((((((((((( (((((((($($(:::::::::FBR-1$($(::$($(/(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/3  /(9(/  /(9(/  522)  /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/           :::: ::::::::::FSDG-1FBR-1$(STN-1$($(FSDG-1(($($($$:::::::::: ::::: :TBR-1$(:/(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/  522)  /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/          :: :6 6:66:::::::FBR-1$($($(66("$($(FSDG-1$$(:::: :::: :::: ::::6TBR-1$($($($(;7(5,250$7(5,$//(*(1'FBR-1 FACE BRICKSTN-1 STONE MASONRYFSDG-1CEMENT BOARD SIDING AND TRIMDARK GREY U.N.ODCMU-1 DECORATIVE CONCRETE MASONRY UNITMP-1 METAL PANEL - COPPER FINISHMP-2 METAL PANEL CEILINGS - COPPER FINISHFSDG-2 FIBER CEMENT PANEL - LIGHT BUFFMP-3 METAL PANEL - DARK GRAY FINISH*/(1*$5< 6$63(17(;785(9(/2856,=(87,/,7<67$&.,1*5811,1*%21'.$627$6721( 1$785$/&2/257(;785(7%'6,=(7%'67$&.,1*9$5,286-$0(6+$5',(9(57,&$/3$1(/6<67(035(),1,6+('3$,17 6:,52125(7(;785(60227+-$0(6+$5',(9(57,&$/3$1(/6<67(035(),1,6+('3$,177(;785(60227+12786('$0&21&087(;785(63/,7)$&(6,=(;67$&.,1*5811,1*%21'&(175,$,:$&2/25;/ &233(50(7$//,& 35(),1,6+('3$,177(;785(60227+$/7(51$7(),5(6721('(/7$&21&($/(')$67(1(53$1(/7,1&(,/,1*;35(66 /,1&2/1&233(57,/(&260232/,7,$1 ; &(175,$,:$&2/25&+$5&2$/*5$<35(),1,6+('3$,177(;785(60227+$/7(51$7(),5(6721('(/7$&21&($/(')$67(1(53$1(/TBR-1 THIN BRICK*/(1*$5< 6$63(17(;785(9(/2856,=(87,/,7<67$&.,1*5811,1*%21'/(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/3  /(9(/  /(9(/  522)  /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/  FSDG-1DCMU-1         $(/(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/  522)  /(9(/  /(9(/  /(9(/  FBR-1FSDG-1STN-1        $($($(GArchitectureInterior DesignLandscape ArchitectureEngineeringBKVROUP222 North Second StreetLong & Kees Bldg Suite 101Minneapolis, MN 55401612.339.3752www.bkvgroup.com‹%.9*URXS6+((7180%(56+((77,7/('5$:1%<&+(&.('%<&200,66,21180%(5352-(&77,7/(&2168/7$176&(57,),&$7,21%,0B(GHQ$YHB(GHQ$YHB$,BUYW$0%0=-'($(;7(5,25(/(9$7,216('(1$9($  &2857<$5'6287+(/(9$7,21$  ($67(/(9$7,21$  ($67(/(9$7,21(;7(5,25(/(9$7,21.(<127(6$( 35(),1,6+('0(7$/5$,/,1*$( 35(),1,6+('0(7$/%$/&21<$( 35(),1,6+('0(7$/&$123< %$6,62)'(6,*10$3(6 &2/25720$7&+03$( 35(),1,6+('0(7$/&23,1*&2/25720$7&+),%(5&(0(173$1(/$( 0$*,&3$&./289(56&2/25720$7&+$'-$&(17),%(5&(0(173$1(/$( ,168/$7('6(&7,21$/29(5+($'*$5$*('225&2/25720$7&+:,1'2:)5$0($( ),5(75($7('/80%(53(5*2/$$( %5,&.62/',(5&2856,1*$( 35(),1,6+('0(7$/&23,1*&2/25720$7&+%5,&.$( :$//02817('/,*+7),;785($( %5,&.'(7$,/,1*5()(572(1/$5*('(/(9$7,21621$$( ),%(5&(0(17'(7$,/,1*5()(572(1/$5*('(/(9$7,21621$$  6287+(/(9$7,21-2*$  &2857<$5'6287+(/(9$7,21-2*,668( '$7('(6&5,37,21 6'6(7 '(6,*1'(9(/230(176(7 ),1$/'(9(/230(173/$1 3(50,76(7 C-1 4891-1861-9392\1 Exhibit C TIF Pro Forma [See attached.] 196 Mixed-Income Apts; 3,439 (sf) Commercial Space Debt A: First Mortgage 53,593,545 63.0%273,436 Subtotal 53,593,545 63.0%273,436 Category Equity 26,375,574 31.0%134,569 Equity 5,100,000 6.0%26,020 Subtotal 31,475,574 37.0%160,590 TOTAL SOURCES 85,069,119 100.0% 434,026 Amount % of Cost Per Unit ACQUISITION COSTS 12,000,000 14.1% 61,224 Land Cost $132.53 psf 12,000,000 14.1% 61,224 CONSTRUCTION COSTS 60,307,999 70.9% 307,694 Residential Building 44,685,619 52.5% 227,988 Underground and Surface Parking $44,002 per 277 stall 12,188,680 14.3% 62,187 Tenant Improvements: 1. Comm Space $97.03 psf 333,700 0.4% 1,703 200,000 0.2% 1,020 350,000 0.4% 1,786 Construction Contingency 2,550,000 4.2%13,010 SOIL REMEDIATION / CORRECTION 750,000 0.9% 3,827 750,000 0.9% 3,827 PERMITS/FEES 1,440,140 1.7% 7,348 878,080 1.0% 4,480 487,060 0.6% 2,485 75,000 0.1%383 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,385,000 4.0% 17,270 10,000 0.0%51 1,500,000 1.8% 7,653 500,000 0.6% 2,551 90,000 0.1%459 600,000 0.7% 3,061 300,000 0.4% 1,531 75,000 0.1%383 310,000 0.4% 1,582 FINANCING COSTS 4,290,980 5.0% 21,893 1,200,000 1.4% 6,122 1,665,980 2.0% 8,500 1,400,000 1.6% 7,143 25,000 0.0%128 DEVELOPER FEE 2,895,000 3.4% 14,770 Developer Fee 2,895,000 3.4% 14,770 TOTAL USES 85,069,119 100% 434,026 Exhibit C - TIF Pro Forma Eden Avenue Redevelopment City of Edina Sources and Uses Detail S&UOther Sources Sources Percent Per Unit Percent Per Unit SOURCES AmountDebt USES Amount Site Prep and Plaza Builder's Risk Soil Remediation & Correction Work Appraisals Architectural, Engineering & Design Fees Lender Draw Fees Captial Origination, Closing & Prop Taxes Construction/Lease Up Period Interest Post-Completion Period Interest FF&E Legal - Development Marketing/Leasing Other - TIF Local SAC/WAC Connection Fees Met Council Sewer Access Connection Capital Partner TIF Supported Developer Equity Development Expense - Legal / Partner Eng Soft Cost Contingency Platting & Survey 10/20/2021 Eden Avenue Redevelopment City of Edina Baseline Operating Pro Forma Residential Income Rental Unit Income Monthly Unit Annual Size Rent/ Unit Type Rent Type Rent Count Revenue Sq. Ft.Sq. Ft. Studio Market Rate $1,650 22 $435,600 525 $3.14 Studio Affordable $696 4 $33,408 525 $1.33 1BR Market Rate $2,150 52 $1,341,600 705 $3.05 1BR Affordable $754 10 $90,480 705 $1.07 2BR Market Rate $3,200 63 $2,419,200 1,084 $2.95 2BR Affordable $936 6 $67,392 1,084 $0.86 2BR - Den Market Rate $3,500 30 $1,260,000 1,292 $2.71 Penthouse Market Rate $5,450 9 $588,600 1,470 $3.71 Gross Potential Rent 519,690 196 $6,236,280 184,146 $2.82 Mkt Rate Only: $2.99 Aff Only: $1.02 # of Stalls Annual $ Per Stall Other Residential Income (if available)Revenue Per Month Underground Parking 277 $515,220 $155 $93,100 Total Other Income $608,320 Total Residential Income $6,844,600 Annual Residential Vacancy Percent Loss Gross Potential Rent 5.0%($311,814) Underground Parking 5.0%($25,761) Other 5.0%($4,655) Total Vacancy ($342,230) Net Residential Income $6,502,370 Commercial Income Rent Annual Commercial Space Per Sq/Ft Revenue Sq/Ft $25.00 $85,975 3,439 Total Commercial Rent $85,975 3,439 Total Annual PerExpense on Commercial Space (if applicable)Cost Sq/Ft Property Taxes (Commercial Portion Only)$31,317 9.11 Total Expenses on Commercial Space $31,317 9.11 Net Commercial Income $117,292 $6,619,662 Expenses Apartment Operating Costs Amount Per Unit $333,200 $1,700 $147,000 $750 $98,000 $500 $102,900 $525 $53,900 $275 $81,340 $415 $107,800 $550 Total Operating Costs $924,140 $4,715 Apartment Management, Taxes, & Reserves Amount Per Unit Management Fees 3.10% Res EGI $201,573 $1,028 Property Taxes $838,847 $4,280 Replacement Reserves $58,800 $300 Total Management and Other Costs $1,099,220 $5,608 Total Rental Unit Expenses $2,023,360 $10,323 Commercial Space Amount Per Sf Other:$31,317 $9.11 Total Commercial Space Expenses $31,317 $9.11 $2,054,677 $10,323 Net Operating Income (NOI)$4,564,985 196 Mixed-Income Apts; 3,439 (sf) Commercial Space 1. Comm Space Other Payroll Leasing & Marketing Utilities Effective Gross Income (EGI) Insurance Turnover Maintenance / Repair Other - Common Area Expenses Total Expenses Property Tax Eden Avenue Redevelopment City of Edina 196 Mixed-Income Apts; 3,439 (sf) Commercial Space Stabilized Operating Proforma and Cash-on Cash Return Stabilized Income Year 1 Year 2 Rental Income Gross Potential Rent 6,236,280 6,361,006 Less: 5.0% Stabilized Vacancy (311,814) (318,050) Less: Additional Pre-stabilization Vacancy (35%)(2,182,698) Total Rental Income 3,741,768 6,042,955 Other Residential Income Vacancy Rate Underground Parking 5.0%515,220 525,524 Other 5.0%93,100 94,962 Less: Vacancy (30,416) (31,024) Less: Additional Pre-stabilization Vacancy (35%)(182,496) Total Other Residential Income 395,408 589,462 Net Residential Income (NRI)4,137,176 6,632,417 Commercial Income Every Year @ 85,975 119,638 Less: Commercial Vacancy (34,390)0 Net Commercial Income 51,585 119,638 Effective Gross Income (EGI)4,188,761 6,752,055 Expenses Year 1 Year 2 Rental Unit Expenses Operating Expenses 924,140 942,623 Management Fee: 3.1% Res EGI Fixed to EGI 125,663 209,314 Property Taxes 104,924 838,847 Reserves: $300 Per Unit PY No Inflation 58,800 58,800 Total Rental Unit Expenses 1,213,527 2,049,584 Commercial Space Expenses Total Expenses - Property Taxes 0 31,317 Total Commercial Expenses 0 31,317 Total Expenses 1,213,527 2,080,901 NET OPERATING INCOME 2,975,234 4,671,155 Tax Increment Financing Revenue Inflator:0 458,513 ADJUSTED NET OPERATING INCOME 2,975,234 5,129,668 Returns Analysis Cash on Cost Annual Return 3.50% 6.03% Cash on Cost Annual Return (w/o TIF assistance)3.50%5.49% Total Development Cost: 85,069,119 6.03% Market Return Rate (Cash on Cost) Target: 5,129,668 Stabilized Net Operating Income (NOI): 4,671,155 A) Annual NOI Financing Gap: 458,513 B) Max TIF Available (70%): 486,543 Annual TIF Payment (Lesser of A or B): 458,513 D-1 4831-9538-0988\5 Exhibit D Form of Go-Ahead Letter [EDEN AVENUE GROUP LETTERHEAD] [Date] City Manager/City of Edina Executive Director/ Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, MN 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear [______]: This letter is submitted pursuant to Section 4.5 of that certain Redevelopment Agreement by and among the CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota statutory city (the “City”); the HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”); and EDEN AVENUE GROUP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Developer”), dated as of November 3, 2021 (the “Redevelopment Agreement”), and is provided as the “Go-Ahead Letter” thereunder. Capitalized terms used in this letter and not defined herein have the meaning given to them in the Redevelopment Agreement. In accordance with Section 4.5 of the Redevelopment Agreement, Developer hereby represents, warrants, and certifies to the City and the Authority that: (i) the debt and equity Financing Commitments have been received by Developer and true and correct copies of the same are attached hereto as Exhibit A; (ii) the organizational chart of Developer attached hereto as Exhibit B includes the identity (including name, city and state of each) of all equity sources with greater than a 10% direct or indirect investment in the Project and the identity (including name, city and state of each) of all individuals and entities with direct or indirect management control of Developer; (iii) true and correct copies of the final purchase agreement and other land acquisition documents related to Developer’s acquisition of the Project Area are attached hereto as Exhibit C, and (iv) Developer is prepared to proceed with the construction of the Minimum Improvements, in accordance with the Redevelopment Agreement. Sincerely, EDEN AVENUE GROUP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: Eden Avenue Partners, LLC, its Manager By: _________________________________________ Name: _______________________________________ Its: __________________________________________ D-2 4831-9538-0988\5 Exhibit A Financing Commitments (See attached) D-3 4831-9538-0988\5 Exhibit B Organizational Chart of Developer (See attached) D-4 4831-9538-0988\5 Exhibit C Final Purchase Agreement and Land Acquisition Documents (See attached) E-1 4847-9479-0397\3 Exhibit E Form of Certificate of Completion with Completion Checklist CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION (4917 Eden Avenue) A. EDEN AVENUE GROUP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Developer”), pursuant to the Redevelopment Agreement by and among the CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota statutory city (the “City”), the HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA (the “Authority”) and Developer dated effective as of November 3, 2021 (as the same may be amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Redevelopment Agreement”), which Redevelopment Agreement is evidenced of record by that certain Memorandum of Redevelopment Agreement dated ____________, 2021 and recorded on ________________, 2021 in the office of the Registrar of Titles for Hennepin County, Minnesota as Document No. ____________, has agreed to complete the Project, as defined in and in accordance with the Redevelopment Agreement, on that certain real property (the “Property”) located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, described on the attached Exhibit A. B. As of the date hereof, Developer has completed construction of the Minimum Improvements in accordance with the Redevelopment Agreement. C. The issuance of this Certificate of Completion by the City and the Authority is not intended nor shall it be construed to be a warranty or representation by the City or the Authority as to the structural soundness of the Minimum Improvements, including, but not limited to, the quality of materials, workmanship or the fitness of the Minimum Improvements for their proposed use. NOW THEREFORE, this is to certify that all construction and other physical improvements specified to be done and made by Developer with regard to the Minimum Improvements have been completed, and the provisions of the Redevelopment Agreement imposing obligations on Developer to construct the Minimum Improvements, are hereby satisfied and terminated, and the Registrar of Titles in and for the County of Hennepin, Minnesota is hereby authorized to record this instrument to be a conclusive determination of the satisfactory termination of said provisions of the Redevelopment Agreement. Dated: ______________, 20___ [Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature pages follow] E-2 [Signature Page to Certificate of Completion] 4847-9479-0397\3 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By _______________________________________ _____________________, Mayor By _______________________________________ _____________________, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _____________, 202___, by ___________ and ___________, the Mayor and City Manager, respectively, of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of the City of Edina. Notary Public E-3 [Signature Page to Certificate of Completion] 4847-9479-0397\3 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By _______________________________________ _____________________, Chair By _______________________________________ _____________________, Secretary STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _____________, 20___, by ___________ and ___________, the Chair and Secretary, respectively, of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of said Authority. Notary Public THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Dorsey & Whitney LLP 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 E-4 [Exhibit A to Certificate of Completion] 4847-9479-0397\3 Exhibit A Legal Description of the Property Tracts A and C, Registered Land Survey No. 1501, Hennepin County, Minnesota E-5 4847-9479-0397\3 Certificate of Completion Checklist (4917 Eden Avenue) This is a summary of the deliverable requirements of the Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) dated November 3, 2021. This sheet is intended to be completed in connection with Developer’s request for a Certificate of Completion and prior to the issuance of the TIF Note. This sheet is provided for convenience and does not modify the terms of the Redevelopment Agreement. PART ONE Description of Required Minimum Improvements Satisfactorily Completed (yes or no) Notes A. Completion* of 2 levels of below-grade parking B. Completion* of 7-story mixed-use building at 4917 Eden Ave. with approximately 176 market rate units, 20 affordable units and 3,400 square feet of commercial space C. Completion * of surface Public Parking D. Completion** of all site work E. Completion ** of Sidewalks and Streetscapes *As evidenced by CO or TCO by Building Department **As evidenced by acceptance of site and street improvements by Engineering and/or Community Development Departments PART TWO Description of Required Public Benefits Satisfactorily Completed (yes or no) Notes A. Public Access Easement for Sidewalks and Streetscapes* B. Permanent easement and acquisition right for Future City Land* C. Parking Easement for Public Parking areas* D. Equity and Diversity Report E. Restrictive Covenant for Affordable Housing* F. First Right of Purchase (Affordable Units)* *Documents must be executed and recorded CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE E-6 4847-9479-0397\3 PART THREE Description of Final Costs Incurred and Gap Analysis Confirmed Amounts Notes A. Confirmation that no Default remains uncured. Yes or No B. Confirmation that Developer has submitted final TIF Pro Forma to reflect actual costs Yes or No C. Total Amount of Qualified Costs (see 3.2(a)) confirmed as expended $ Estimated to be $____ D. Total Development Costs of Minimum Improvements $ Estimated to be $85,069,119 E. Total Amount grant funds received $ F. Final financial gap to provide Market Return $ NTE 6.03% G. Principle Amount of Original TIF Note $ NTE lowest of $5.1 million or 6.10% of Total Development Cost Certificate of Completion Checklist – 4917 Eden Avenue Prepared by: ________________________________________ ___________________ Signature and Title Date Approved by: ________________________________________ ___________________ Signature, Date Edina City Manager / HRA Executive Director F-1 4842-1088-0764\1 Exhibit F Form of Memorandum of Redevelopment Agreement Memorandum of Redevelopment Agreement This Memorandum of Redevelopment Agreement (this “Memorandum”) is entered into as of November 3, 2021, by and among the City of Edina Minnesota, a Minnesota statutory city (the “City”), the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (“Authority”), and Eden Avenue Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Developer”). RECITALS: A. The City, Authority, and Developer (collectively, the “Parties”) have entered into a certain Redevelopment Agreement dated as of November 3, 2021 (as the same may be amended, modified, and/or supplemented from time to time, the “Redevelopment Agreement”), whereby the parties have agreed to various aspects of the redevelopment of certain real property more particularly described on the attached Exhibit A, together with all improvements, tenements, easements, rights and appurtenances pertaining to such real property, lying and being in Hennepin County, Minnesota (the “Property”). B. The parties wish to give notice of the existence of the Redevelopment Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The above recitals are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. 2. Capitalized terms, when not defined herein, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Redevelopment Agreement. 3. The Parties have entered into the Redevelopment Agreement to set forth the terms and provisions governing the redevelopment of the Property. 4. This Memorandum has been executed and delivered by the Parties for the purpose of recording and giving notice that a contractual relationship for the redevelopment of the Property has been created between the Parties in accordance with the terms, covenants, and conditions of the Agreement. The Parties intend, declare and covenant, on behalf of themselves and all future owners and operators of the Property, that the Redevelopment Agreement and the covenants and restrictions set forth therein regulating and restricting the use, occupancy and transfer of the Property (a) shall be and are covenants running with the Property, encumbering the Property, binding upon the Parties’ successors in title and all subsequent owners and operators of the Property; (b) are not merely personal covenants of the Parties; and (c) shall bind the Parties and their respective successors and assigns. 5. The terms and conditions of the Agreement are incorporated by reference into this Memorandum as if fully set forth herein. 6. This Memorandum may be executed separately in counterparts which, when taken together, shall constitute one and the same instrument. [Remainder of page left blank intentionally; signature pages follow] F-2 [Signature Page to Memorandum of Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue)] 4842-1088-0764\1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Memorandum as of the date first written above. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: __________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor By: __________________________________ Scott H. Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _____________, 2021, by James B. Hovland and Scott H. Neal, the Mayor and City Manager, respectively, of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of the City of Edina. ____________________________________________ Notary Public F-3 [Signature Page to Memorandum of Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue)] 4842-1088-0764\1 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: ______________________________ James B. Hovland, Chair By: ______________________________ James Pierce, Secretary STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _______________, 2021, by James B. Hovland and James Pierce, the Chair and Secretary, respectively, of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of said Authority. ____________________________________________ Notary Public F-4 [Signature Page to Memorandum of Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue)] 4842-1088-0764\1 EDEN AVENUE GROUP, LLC By: Eden Avenue Partners, LLC, its Manager By: _________________________________________ Name: Nicholas Walton Its: Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of ________________, 2021, by Nicholas Walton, the Manager of Eden Avenue Partners, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, the Manager of Eden Avenue Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on behalf of the company. ____________________________________________ Notary Public THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Dorsey & Whitney LLP 50 South Sixth Street Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 F-5 [Exhibit A to Memorandum of Redevelopment Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue)] 4842-1088-0764\1 Exhibit A Legal Description Tracts A and C, Registered Land Survey No. 1501, Hennepin County, Minnesota G-1 4838-6280-7804\4 Exhibit G Form of TIF Note LIMITED REVENUE TAXABLE TAX INCREMENT NOTE (4917 Eden Avenue) No. R-_____ $[__________] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA LIMITED REVENUE TAXABLE TAX INCREMENT NOTE The HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA (the “Authority”) acknowledges itself to be indebted and, for value received, promises to pay to the order of EDEN AVENUE GROUP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, or its assigns (“Developer”), solely from the source, to the extent and in the manner hereinafter provided, up to the principal amount of this Limited Revenue Taxable Tax Increment Note (this “Note”) as provided herein, together with simple interest thereon accrued on the unpaid principal balance hereof from the date hereof, at the rate of interest of [________________] percent ([____]%) per annum, on the Payment Dates (as hereinafter defined). This Note is executed and delivered in accordance with the terms and conditions of that certain Redevelopment Agreement dated as of November 3, 2021, by and among the City of Edina, Minnesota (the “City”), the Authority and Developer (as the same may be amended, modified, and/or supplemented from time to time, the “Redevelopment Agreement”), and is subject to the terms, conditions, and limitations on payment set forth therein, including, without limitation, the provisions of Section 3.4 (TIF Assistance and Potential Adjustment) of the Redevelopment Agreement. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning given to them in the Redevelopment Agreement. Each payment on this Note is payable in any coin or currency of the United States of America which on the date of such payment is legal tender for public and private debts and shall be made by check or draft made payable to Developer and mailed to Developer at its postal address within the United States which shall be designated from time to time by Developer. This Note is a special and limited obligation and not a general obligation of the Authority, which has been issued by the Authority pursuant to, and in full conformity with, the Constitution and the laws of the State of Minnesota, including Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1794 (the “TIF Act”), and the terms and conditions of the Redevelopment Agreement and a resolution of the Board of the Authority, to aid in financing a “project” (as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 8) of the Authority within the Eden / Willson Tax Increment Financing District established by the Authority pursuant to Resolution No. 2021-12 (the “TIF District”). G-2 4838-6280-7804\4 The maximum principal amount of this Note attributable to Qualified Redevelopment Costs shall not exceed $[_________________]. Subject to Section 3.4 of the Redevelopment Agreement, if the Updated TIF Pro Forma demonstrates a return on the Minimum Improvements exceeding the Market Return Rate, Developer shall surrender this Note upon the issuance of a new TIF Note. Subject to the terms of the Redevelopment Agreement, principal of and interest on this Note shall be payable solely from and in the amount of Available Tax Increments (as hereinafter defined) on each February 1 and August 1 commencing on the first February 1 or August 1 immediately following the date hereof (the “Payment Dates”). On each Payment Date, the Authority shall apply Available Tax Increments to the payment of principal of and interest on this Note in an amount not to exceed the amount necessary to provide the Market Return Rate (the “Payment Amount”); provided, however, that in the event that Available Tax Increments is not sufficient to pay when due the Payment Amount, the failure of the Authority to pay the Payment Amount on any Payment Date shall not constitute a default under this Note as long as the Authority pays the Payment Amount to the extent of Available Tax Increments. To the extent that the Authority is unable to pay the total principal and interest due on this Note at or prior to [_________] 1, 20[__] [to be the Payment Date immediately preceding the 15th anniversary of the Authority’s first receipt of Tax Increments] (the “Maturity Date”) hereof as a result of its having received as of such date insufficient Available Tax Increments, such failure shall not constitute a default under this Note and the Authority shall have no further obligation to pay unpaid balance of principal or accrued interest that may remain after such Maturity Date. All payments made by the Authority on this Note shall be applied first to accrued interest and then to the principal amount of this Note. Interest shall be computed on the basis of a year of 360 days and charged for actual days principal is unpaid. “Available Tax Increments” means up to 70% of the Tax Increments generated from the Project Area received and retained by the Authority from the County of Hennepin, Minnesota, pursuant to the TIF Act, for the six months before each Payment Date. EXCEPT AS TO THE OBLIGATION TO MAKE PAYMENTS FROM THE AVAILABLE TAX INCREMENTS, THIS NOTE IS NOT A DEBT OF THE AUTHORITY, THE CITY, OR THE STATE OF MINNESOTA (THE “STATE”), AND NEITHER THE AUTHORITY, THE CITY, THE STATE NOR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF SHALL BE LIABLE ON THIS NOTE, NOR SHALL THIS NOTE BE PAYABLE OUT OF ANY FUNDS OR PROPERTIES OTHER THAN AVAILABLE TAX INCREMENTS. Upon an Event of Default by Developer under the Redevelopment Agreement, the Authority may exercise the remedies with respect to this Note described in the Redevelopment Agreement, the terms of which are incorporated herein by reference, including, without limitation, the suspension or termination of the Authority’s obligation to make any payments under this Note. For avoidance of doubt, the terms of Redevelopment Agreement incorporated herein by the foregoing reference, shall, for purposes of this Note, survive any termination of the Redevelopment Agreement occurring after the issuance of this Note. The principal sum and all accrued interest payable under this Note is prepayable in whole or in part at any time by the Authority without premium or penalty. No partial prepayment shall affect the amount or timing of any other regular payment otherwise required to be made under this Note. G-3 4838-6280-7804\4 The outstanding principal balance due under this Note shall be subject to redemption and prepayment, in whole or in part, at the option of the Authority and, if redemption is in part, installments of principal shall be applied to reduce the principal to become due on this Note in inverse order of maturity, or, at the written direction of the Authority, pro rata from each maturity. Developer shall never have or be deemed to have the right to compel any exercise of any taxing power of the Authority or the City or any other public body, and neither the Authority nor the City nor any director, commissioner, council member, board member, officer, employee or agent of the Authority or the City, nor any person executing or registering this Note shall be liable personally hereon by reason of the issuance or registration hereof or otherwise. THE AUTHORITY MAKES NO REPRESENTATION, COVENANT, OR WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, THAT THE AVAILABLE TAX INCREMENTS WILL BE SUFFICIENT TO PAY, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, THE PRINCIPAL OF AND INTEREST ON THIS NOTE. NO HOLDER OF THIS NOTE SHALL HAVE RIGHTS AGAINST THE AUTHORITY EXCEPT FOR DISTRIBUTION OF AVAILABLE TAX INCREMENTS. Except as otherwise provided in the Redevelopment Agreement, this Note shall not be assignable or transferable without the prior written consent of the Authority; provided, however, that such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any assignee or transferee must execute and deliver to the Authority a certificate, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Authority, pursuant to which, among other things, such assignee or transferee acknowledges and represents: (a) the assignee or transferee delivers to the Authority a written instrument acknowledging the limited nature of the Authority’s payment obligations under this Note, and (b) the assignee or transferee executes and delivers to the Authority a certificate, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Authority, pursuant to which, among other things, such assignee or transferee represents (i) that this Note is being acquired for investment for such assignee’s or transferee’s own account, not as a nominee or agent, and not with a view to the resale or distribution of any part thereof, (ii) that the assignee or transferee has no present intention of selling, granting any participation in, or otherwise distributing the same, (iii) that the assignee or transferee is an “accredited investor” within the meaning of Rule 501 of the Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (iv) that the assignee or transferee, either alone or with such assignee’s or transferee’s representatives, has knowledge and experience in financial and business matters and is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of the prospective investment in this Note and the assignee or transferee is able to bear the economic consequences thereof, (v) that in making its decision to acquire this Note, the assignee or transferee has relied upon independent investigations made by the assignee or transferee and, to the extent believed by such assignee or transferee to be appropriate, the assignee’s or transferee’s representatives, including its own professional, tax and other advisors, and has not relied upon any representation or warranty from the Authority, or any of its officers, employees, agents, affiliates or representatives, with respect to the value of this Note, (vi) that the Authority has not made any warranty, acknowledgment or covenant, in writing or otherwise, to the assignee or transferee regarding the tax consequences, if any, of the acquisition and investment in this Note, (vii) that the assignee or transferee or its representatives have been given a full opportunity to examine all documents and to ask questions of, and to receive answers from, the Authority and its representatives concerning the terms of this Note and such other information as the assignee or transferee desires in order to evaluate the acquisition of and investment in this Note, and all such questions have been answered to the full satisfaction of the assignee or transferee, (viii) that the assignee or transferee has evaluated the merits and risks of investment in this Note and has determined that this Note is a suitable investment for the assignee or transferee in light of such party’s overall financial condition and prospects, (ix) that this Note will be characterized as “restricted securities” under the federal securities laws because this Note is being acquired in a transaction not involving a public offering and that under such laws and applicable regulations such securities may not be resold without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as G-4 4838-6280-7804\4 amended, except in certain limited circumstances, and (x) that no market for this Note exists and no market for this Note is intended to be developed. This Note is issued pursuant to the Resolution of the Board of the Authority and is entitled to the benefits thereof, which Resolution is incorporated herein by reference. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all acts, conditions, and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to have happened, and to be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Note have been done, have happened, and have been performed in regular and due form, time, and manner as required by law; and that this Note, together with all other indebtedness of the Authority or the City outstanding on the date hereof and on the date of its actual issuance and delivery, does not cause the indebtedness of the Authority or the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation thereon. [Remainder of this page intentionally left blank; signatures on following page] G-5 4838-6280-7804\4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, has caused this Note to be executed by the manual signatures of the Chair and the Secretary of the Authority, and has caused this Note to be dated as of the date of original issue specified above. Chair Secretary H-1 4891-1861-9392\1 Exhibit H Sample IRR Calculations and Project TIF Adjustment Calculation [See attached.] EXHIBIT H - Sample IRR Calculations and Project TIF Adjustment Calculations Eden Avenue Redevelopment 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 SALE ANALYSIS END OF YEAR Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Net Operating Income End of Year 5,241,670 5,355,913 5,472,440 5,591,298 5,712,533 5,836,192 5,962,325 6,090,981 Divided By Cap Rate 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% Gross Sale Price 104,833,402 107,118,250 109,448,796 111,825,952 114,250,652 116,723,845 119,246,502 121,819,613 Minus Debt A: First Mortgage 52,678,727 51,724,938 50,730,518 49,693,735 48,612,786 47,485,789 46,310,781 45,085,719 Net Sale Amount 52,154,675 55,393,313 58,718,278 62,132,217 65,637,866 69,238,057 72,935,721 76,733,894 Sales Expense 1.50% (1,572,501) (1,606,774) (1,641,732) (1,677,389) (1,713,760) (1,750,858) (1,788,698) (1,827,294) SALES PROCEEDS 50,582,174 53,786,539 57,076,546 60,454,828 63,924,106 67,487,199 71,147,024 74,906,600 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Sales Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Year Proceeds Flow Flow Flow Flow Flow Flow Flow Flow Initial Investment (31,475,574) (31,475,574) (31,475,574) (31,475,574) (31,475,574) (31,475,574) (31,475,574) (31,475,574) 2023 00000000 2024 735,560 735,560 735,560 735,560 735,560 735,560 735,560 735,560 2025 2,889,993 2,889,993 2,889,993 2,889,993 2,889,993 2,889,993 2,889,993 2,889,993 2026 50,582,174 52,686,742 2,104,568 2,104,568 2,104,568 2,104,568 2,104,568 2,104,568 2,104,568 2027 53,786,539 0 56,005,349 2,218,810 2,218,810 2,218,810 2,218,810 2,218,810 2,218,810 2028 57,076,546 0 0 59,411,884 2,335,338 2,335,338 2,335,338 2,335,338 2,335,338 2029 60,454,828 0 0 0 62,909,023 2,454,196 2,454,196 2,454,196 2,454,196 2030 63,924,106 0 0 0 0 66,499,536 2,575,431 2,575,431 2,575,431 2031 67,487,199 0 0 0 0 0 70,186,289 2,699,090 2,699,090 2032 71,147,024 0 0 0 0 0 0 73,972,247 2,825,223 2033 74,906,600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77,860,478 2034 78,769,053 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2035 82,737,622 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2036 74,906,600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2037 78,769,053 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2038 82,737,622 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 24,836,721 30,259,897 35,885,242 41,717,719 47,762,428 54,024,611 60,509,658 67,223,113 INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN 16.02% 15.02% 14.32% 13.80% 13.38% 13.04% 12.76% 12.51% Section 3.4(e) IRR TARGET 22.00% 20.00% 20.00% 20.00% 18.00% 18.00% 18.00% 16.00% PROJECT RETURN EXCEEDED?No No No No No No No No PROJECT EXCESS RETURN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Credit: Remaining TIF Note Balance (4,575,499) (4,297,251) (4,007,761) (3,706,577) (3,393,224) (3,067,213) (2,728,030) (2,375,144) A) Remaining Excess Return 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B) Cum. TIF Note P&I Payments: 917,026 1,375,539 1,834,052 2,292,565 2,751,078 3,209,591 3,668,104 4,126,617 TIF Adjustment Due (Lesser A or B):0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notes: Cap Rate: 5.00%Stabilized TIF Note: $5,100,000 Sales Expense: 1.50%TIF Note Rate: 4.00% Development Cost: $85,069,119 Annual TIF P&I: $458,513 Equity Investment: $31,475,574 Initial First Mortgage: $53,593,545 Additional Debt: $0 Analaysis of potential Internal Rate of Return of TIF proforma project cashflows and potential sales through year 10. Sales proceeds assume onetime sale of the Minimum Improvements using valuation based on TIF pro forma Net Operating Income. Annual cash flows include Net Operating Income less annual debt service and reserve allowance. Potential sales are hypothetical and provided solely for purposes of providing an example of the Sale Lookback provisions. Assumptions: City of Edina Sales and Cashflow Analysis for Sample IRR Calculations IRR ANALYSIS END OF YEAR 196 Mixed-Income Apts; 3,439 (sf) Commercial Space I-1 4891-1861-9392\1 Exhibit I Concept Plan for Future City Transportation Infrastructure Project [See attached.] FILE NO. DATE:9/9/2021 PHASE 1 POTENTIAL TIF-FUNDED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS J-1 4891-1861-9392\1 Exhibit J Inclusionary Housing Policy Program Guide [See attached.] March 2020 Page 1 of 31 Affordable Housing Program Policy Guide March 2020 March 2020 Page 2 of 31 Table of Contents Introduction to the Affordable Multi-Family Housing Program (AHP) ..............................................................................................4 Chapter 1 – Overview of Affordable Housing Program Policy ...........5 1.01 Period of Affordability (POA) ................................................................................................................. 5 1.02 Affordable Dwelling Units (ADUs) ........................................................................................................ 5 Affordability Standards – Rental Projects ........................................................................................................... 5 Affordability Standards – For Sale Projects ......................................................................................................... 6 1.03 Student Households ............................................................................................................................... 6 1.04 New Multi-Family Affordable Housing Program (AHP) Rent Limits ..................................................... 6 1.05 Rental Assistance .................................................................................................................................. 7 1.06 Allowable Fees and Charges .................................................................................................................. 7 1.07 Fixed or Floating Affordable Dwelling Units .......................................................................................... 8 1.08 Rent Increases ....................................................................................................................................... 8 1.09 Utility Allowances ................................................................................................................................. 8 1.10 Record Retention ................................................................................................................................ 10 1.11 Leases .................................................................................................................................................. 10 1.12 Income Certification ............................................................................................................................ 11 1.13 Increases in Income ............................................................................................................................ 11 1.14 Property Standards ............................................................................................................................. 11 1.15 Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan ........................................................................................... 12 1.16 Fair Lease and Grievance Procedures .................................................................................................. 12 Chapter 2 – Maintaining the Unit Mix ............................................ 12 2.01 Fixed Affordable Dwelling Units .......................................................................................................... 13 2.02 Floating Affordable Dwelling Units .................................................................................................... 13 Chapter 3 – General Occupancy Guidelines .................................... 15 3.01 Qualification of Applicants ................................................................................................................. 15 3.02 Eligibility Determination ..................................................................................................................... 16 3.03 Change in Household Composition ...................................................................................................... 16 3.04 Minimum Lease Requirements ............................................................................................................ 17 3.05 House Rules ......................................................................................................................................... 17 3.06 Number of Persons Per Unit ............................................................................................................... 17 3.07 Tenant Selection Plan ......................................................................................................................... 18 March 2020 Page 3 of 31 3.08 Government Data Practices Act Disclosure Statement Form ............................................................. 18 3.09 Income Verification ............................................................................................................................. 19 3.10 Gross Annual Household Income ........................................................................................................ 19 3.11 Factors that Affect Household Size ..................................................................................................... 20 3.12 General Income Verification Requirements ......................................................................................... 21 3.13 Corrections to Documents ................................................................................................................... 24 3.14 Effective Term of Verifications ............................................................................................................ 24 3.15 Over Income Households ..................................................................................................................... 24 3.16 Annual Recertification ........................................................................................................................ 24 3.17 Tenant Files ......................................................................................................................................... 25 Chapter 4 – Reporting Requirements ............................................. 27 4.01 Annual Owner/Agent Certifications .................................................................................................... 27 4.02 Compliance Reports ............................................................................................................................. 27 4.03 Utility Allowance Source Document ................................................................................................... 27 Chapter 5 – Compliance Inspections .............................................. 28 5.01 Physical Inspections ............................................................................................................................ 28 5.02 Review of Tenant Files and Property Records ..................................................................................... 28 Chapter 6 – Correction and Consequences of Non-Compliance ...... 29 6.01 Notice to Owner/Agent ....................................................................................................................... 29 6.02 Correction Period ................................................................................................................................ 29 6.03 Owner’s/Agent’s Response .................................................................................................................. 29 Chapter 7 – Requests for Action .................................................... 31 7.01 Sale or Transfer ................................................................................................................................... 31 March 2020 Page 4 of 31 Introduction to the Affordable Multi-Family Housing Program (AHP) Properties developed using financing from the City of Edina, or because of our policy for New Multi-Family Affordable Housing, are subject to specific rules designed to ensure that affordability pledges made by owners and developers remain available to very low and low income tenants (30% to 60% of Area Median Income) throughout the required Period of Affordability (the POA). This Guide is designed to assist owners and their agents with planning and maintaining compliance with the local requirements associated with these rental properties that include affordable units. This guide does not pertain to the Market Rate units. It is the responsibility of City of Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (hereafter the “HRA”) to monitor the continuing compliance of affordable units in accordance with local policy and governing agreements throughout the POA. The following procedures apply to all rental properties that received funds or a Planned Unit Development (PUD) under the local policy on New Multi-Family Affordable Housing (AHP). Any violation of the AHP requirements could constitute a covenant default of the governing agreement(s) and imposition of all local government rights and remedies. While successful operation of an affordable property is management intensive, the owner/agent is responsible for ensuring that the governing agreement requirements are properly administered. Thorough understanding of requirements and compliance monitoring procedures requires training of owners/agents. The owner/agent should ensure that it knows and understands the requirements of the affordable housing policy and the compliance requirements since failure to comply may have very serious consequences. The HRA recommends that owners, management agents and site managers (collectively referred to as “owner/agent” throughout this document) receive compliance training before certifying or leasing any affordable units. At a minimum, training should cover key compliance terms, determination of rents, household eligibility, file documentation, procedures for maintaining the required unit mix and reporting. Record retention and property condition standards are also key to maintaining compliance. Attending educational opportunities as offered is strongly recommended to keep up with any procedural changes to the AHP. Should the AHP assisted property also receive an allocation of Section 42 tax credits (Low Income Housing Tax Credits or LIHTC), and the property is found to be compliant with the tax credit program, then the HRA will consider the property compliant with the AHP. Owners/Agents of AHP assisted properties must annually certify to the HRA that the property is compliant with the Low Income Housing Tax Credit program. The HRA’s determination to monitor the project for compliance with requirements of the AHP does not make it liable for an owner’s/agent's noncompliance. This Guide will be made available to the owner/agent at project financial closing and will be posted on the City’s website. The HRA, in its sole discretion, may delegate its compliance reporting and monitoring responsibilities to a third-party. AHP assisted properties will have a compliance review at initial lease up and every third (3rd) year thereafter. However, the HRA reserves the right to conduct a March 2020 Page 5 of 31 compliance review annually. During the compliance review, the HRA or third-party monitoring agent, will ensure compliance against City Agreements by inspecting records of residential student status, income and asset documentation, and rent record for each resident household for all project’s AHP assisted units. The first review for new projects will occur no later than the end of the second year of the period of affordability. Chapter 1 – Overview of Affordable Housing Program Policy The following is an overview the Affordable Housing Policy. It is not intended to be detailed or comprehensive. The requirements of the AHP apply to market rate residential developments that receive a PUD approval from the City of Edina and/or financial assistance from the HRA. This includes new developments and mixed-used developments that create twenty (20) or more multi-family dwelling units and/or any change in use of all or part of an existing building from a non-residential use to a residential use that includes at least twenty (20) dwelling units. 1.01 Period of Affordability (POA) Affordable units created under the Affordable Housing Policy (AHP) are rent and income controlled for a minimum of 20 years with a maximum established by the funding source and reflected in the binding agreement. This term is referred to as the Period of Affordability or POA. Owners/agents should refer to the property’s governing agreements, at project commitment, to determine the specific terms and conditions that govern the property, as the affordability period was increased from 15 years to 20 years in March 2019. Project Commitment is a schedule of commitments within the project’s Financing Agreement(s) between the parties hereto, such as the authorizing Resolution, Development Agreement and/or Loan Documents, dated as of the Execution Date and their related agreements. 1.02 Affordable Dwelling Units (ADUs) At least ten percent (10%) to twenty percent (20%) of the total number of dwelling units in a development receiving a PUD and/or assisted with local funds under the AHP will be designated as Affordable Dwelling Units (ADUs). The percentage applied is based on the affordability standard of the development. Affordability Standards – Rental Projects If an AHP property also is assisted with Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), the AHP Affordability Standard is based on the LIHTC election (Income Averaging, 20/50 or 40/60 set aside). If an AHP property is NOT assisted with LIHTC, then the HRA together with the owner will determine which affordability standard applies. The legal document executed with the HRA determines the standard. March 2020 Page 6 of 31 10% at 50% At least ten percent (10%) of total units developed shall be occupied by households at or below fifty percent (50%) of the MTSP (Multifamily Tax Subsidy Income Limits, i.e. tax credit income limits). 20% at 60% At least twenty percent (20%) of total units developed shall be occupied by households at or below sixty percent (60%) of the MTSP. Affordability Standards – For Sale Projects At least ten percent (10%) of total units developed shall be affordable for households as follows: 1-2 person household $100,000 3+ person household $115,000 Adjusted annually by Minnesota Housing as posted on their website. 1.03 Student Households AHP adopted the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program restrictions on student participation found at 24 CFR 5.612 and excludes any individual that: 1. Is enrolled in a higher education institution; AND 2. Is under the age of 24; and 3. Is not a veteran of the US Military; and 4. Is not married*; and 5. Does not have a dependent child(ren); and 6. Is not a person with disabilities; and 7. Is not otherwise individually eligible, or has parents who, individually or jointly, are not eligible on the basis of income * Effective August 1, 2013 same-sex marriages are recognized as marriages for student eligibility purposes. 1.04 New Multi-Family Affordable Housing Program (AHP) Rent Limits Every ADU is subject to maximum allowable rents based on bedroom size for the area in which the property is located. These maximum rents are referred to as the AHP rents. These limits represent the maximum that owners/agents can charge for rent, including an allowance for March 2020 Page 7 of 31 tenant paid utilities, and other non-optional charges (i.e. parking, required renter’s insurance, etc.). AHP will utilize the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development annually published median income amounts for all Minnesota counties. Minnesota Housing uses these amounts to calculate the maximum allowable rents and tenant income. Minnesota Housing publishes the LIHTC income and rent limits on its website and notifies owners/agents of the updated limits as they become available. According to AHP, the date a Certificate of Occupancy is issued to a building will determine which rent and income limits to use. Minnesota Housing provides different tables (Table A, B, C, etc.) of income and rent limits based on your Certificate of Occupancy dates and updates these tables annually. To avoid noncompliance, be sure you are using the correct limits table. In the event AHP rent limits decrease for an area, or utility allowances increase, an owner/agent may be required to reduce the rent charged but will not be required to lower rents below those in effect at the time when the Development Agreement was signed by the City. 1.05 Rental Assistance Tenant Based Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers. Tenants with Section 8 vouchers, or similar state or federal tenant based rental assistance (TBRA) subsidies tied to a tenant and not a unit, may be charged rent that exceeds the applicable AHP rent for the unit to an extent allowed by HUD, Metro HRA, and/or the most restrictive funding source. ADUs layered with tenant or project based rental assistance qualify households using the Very Low-Income limits (<50%) and the household pays no more than 30% of its monthly adjusted income for rent; ADU rent therefore remains affordable. Tenants receiving rental assistance, including Section 8 subsidy, must not be refused tenancy in an ADU based solely on the fact that they receive rental assistance. For eligibility purposes, the tenant selection plan must indicate that household income does not need to equal at least two times the unit rent (or any variation thereof) as long as the published Payment Standard subsidy can cover the project’s intended rent. The HRA annually publishes Payment Standards (a rent limit for using a Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher. Payment standards are set by each housing authority. They differ for bedroom size and property location). 1.06 Allowable Fees and Charges Fees considered reasonable and customary may be charged, such as application fee, if such fees are customary for rental housing in the neighborhood. Fees for parking or services such as bus transportation or meals can only be charged if the services are voluntary and are not a condition of occupancy. An eligible tenant cannot be charged a fee for the owner or manager’s work involved in completing the additional forms or documentation required for the AHP, such as the Resident Income Certification. Down payment fees/rent deposit for the ADU should not exceed one month’s rent. March 2020 Page 8 of 31 1.07 Fixed or Floating Affordable Dwelling Units ADUs may be “fixed” or “floating” and are designated on a property-by-property basis. The enforcement agreement must contain fixed or floating unit designations. Fixed Units – The ADUs are identified by unit number and never change. Development Agreements may outline a specific quantity of bedroom sizes and square footage, including minimum floor space, when considering the placement of ADUs within the project. Units in properties where all units are ADUs automatically are considered fixed. If units throughout a project are not comparable (as defined by the HRA) or are in several scattered sites, the ADU unit designation must be fixed. Floating Units – The ADUs may change over time as long as the total number of ADUs and specific quantity of bedroom sizes or ADU total square footage in the property remains compliant with the original Development Agreement. If a property’s enforcement agreement does not specify floating units, then the units that were initially designated as ADUs at project completion will be used to determine comparable floating units. See Chapter 2, Maintaining the Unit Mix, for more information. 1.08 Rent Increases If ADU rents remain below the maximum allowed, an owner/agent may impose a rent increase as allowed by the enforcement agreement no earlier than one year from the date the project was completed (date the building Certificate of Occupancy was issued) and no more frequently than once a year thereafter. If an owner/agent wishes to increase rents, the request must be within reasonable limits to cover increases in expenses such as real estate taxes or operating expenses. At no time can proposed rent increases exceed the current MTSP (LIHTC rents) rent limits for that development. If the owner/agent increases rents as provided above, tenants must be given a written notice 90 days in advance or in accordance with lease provisions before implementation. 1.09 Utility Allowances The AHP requires that an allowance for tenant paid utilities be considered as a housing cost to the tenant and be factored in when determining rent for an ADU. The HRA approved the use of Metro HRA’s Utility Allowance Schedule (effective 2/1/18 and amended annually) as the document to use to determine an ADU’s utility allowance. Utility allowance schedules are usually updated annually. It is the owner’s/agent’s responsibility to obtain an updated utility allowance and retain it in the property records. Changes in utility allowances must be implemented within 90 days of the publication effective date. If an increase in the utility allowance causes the ADU rent to exceed the applicable AHP rent limit, the unit rent must be adjusted (lowered) to bring the gross rent of the unit into compliance with the AHP rent limits. However, at no time will the ADU rent be adjusted to an amount lower than the ADU rent in place at project commitment. March 2020 Page 9 of 31 An alternative estimate for utility payments may be used, as allowed by Section 42 and approved by the City. Utility allowance methodology change requests and all supporting documentation must be emailed to the Affordable Housing Development Manager at the City for approval. Requests for a change in the property's established utility allowance methodology, to one of the approved utility allowance methodologies should reflect savings from energy efficiency improvements in a manner that is fair to tenants, financially feasible for owners and reduces long-term public subsidy expenditures. General Submission Requirements Each request for a change in utility allowance methodology must include: 1. Cover letter with the current utility allowance and proposed utility methodology 2. A current utility allowance schedule (i.e. local Metro HRA Utility chart) completed with tenant paid utilities 3. Copy of 90-day Notice to the resident including new Utility Allowance and Tenant Rent 4. Utility Allowance Certification, signed and dated 5. Supporting documentation as required (estimate from a properly licensed engineer for example) Allowable Utility Allowance Methodologies The property owner may request to use one or more of the following utility allowance methodologies that meets the AHP requirements. If the project has multiple funding sources, the rents must comply with the program gross rent limits for each program. If the project also has Section 8 Project Based Assistance, the PBA administrator determines the UA schedule for the unit. PHA Utility Method: The local PHA utility allowance for the voucher program. This is the typical current method of establishing Utility Allowances used by most Section 42 LIHTC projects. Owners may request consideration of a different utility allowance methodology from the following alternatives: 1. HUD Utility Schedule Model (HUSM): An estimate calculated via HUD’s online Utility Schedule Model, using recent utility rates. The HUSM enables users to calculate utility schedules using a project specific methodology by entering the property housing type, and utility rate information (tariffs) for the property location. This model is based on climate and survey information from the U. S. Energy Information Administration of the Department of Energy and it incorporates energy efficiency and Energy Star data. The HUSM (web based and Excel format) and use instructions can be accessed on the HUD Exchange website User at: https://www.hudexchange.info/trainings/courses/hud- utility-schedule-model-calculating-utilityallowances-for-home-webinar1/ 2. Utility Company Estimate (UCE): An estimate from a local utility company providing the estimated cost of utilities for a unit of similar size and construction for the project or from the geographic area where the project is located. 3. Energy Consumption or Engineered Model (ECM): An estimate from a properly licensed engineer, or qualified professional, using an energy consumption model that takes into March 2020 Page 10 of 31 account the unit size, building orientation, design and materials, mechanical systems, appliances and characteristics of the building location. If the ECM report is completed by a qualified professional that is not a properly licensed engineer, the request must include additional information to support the qualifications and experience of the qualified professional in providing energy consumption utility allowance reports. The engineer or qualified professional must be licensed in Minnesota. If the property is regulated by HUD, or another form of project-based subsidy, the program- approved utility allowance may be used. 1.10 Record Retention Owners/agents must retain each household’s initial application forms including household income and asset documentation and lease and leasing agreements/addenda for three (3) years after the tenant’s move out effective date. Owners/agents must maintain applicant and tenant information in a way to ensure confidentiality. Any applicant or tenant affected by negligent disclosure or improper use of information may bring a civil action for damages against the owner/agent and seek other relief, as appropriate. Owners/agents must dispose of records in a manner that will prevent any unauthorized access to personal information, e.g., burn, pulverize, shred, etc. 1.11 Leases Each lease must include the legal name(s) of the parties to the agreement and all other occupants, a description of the unit to be rented (address), the term of the lease, the rental amount, the use of the premises, and the rights and obligations of each party. The lease shall also inform the tenant that fraudulent statements and information are grounds for eviction and that the tenant could become subject to penalties available under federal law. Initial leases for ADUs must be for 12 months unless another term is agreed to mutually by owner/agent and tenant. If tenant agrees to a shorter term, that agreement must be in writing and kept in the tenant’s file. At no time can a lease term be for less than 30 days. ADU leases must contain language that the owner/agent reserves the right to adjust tenant rents in accordance with the AHP rent limits and/or in the event a tenant’s income increases above the income limits of the AHP. The lease also must contain a provision that the owner/agent retains the right to recertify the tenant’s income and household composition on an annual basis. The tenant’s failure to cooperate with the annual recertification constitutes a violation of the lease. If the lease used for the ADU unit does not contain any of the required provisions and/or contains any prohibited provisions, an AHP Lease Addendum must be signed by the tenant and March 2020 Page 11 of 31 kept in the tenant’s file. If a new lease is executed, a new AHP Lease Addendum also must be executed. Prohibited lease terms are defined in the AHP Lease Addendum (see Appendix B). Owner/Agent may not evict or terminate resident (including refusal to renew a lease) without good cause. Good cause is (a) serious or repeated violation(s) of the material terms and conditions of the Resident Lease. Use of the AHP Lease Addendum including the AHP Lease Rider outlining provisions on evictions and terminations is mandatory. During the final year of the POA, new leases for the Affordable Units must be for a term of no less than six months, and such newly leased Affordable Units will be subject to all the Affordable Housing Requirements until the expiration of such new leases. An AHP Lease Addendum is not required when the HUD model lease for subsidized housing is used. 1.12 Income Certification The owner/agent must verify and certify tenant income eligibility and student status at move in and recertify at least annually thereafter. At initial move in, or when first being determined eligible for an ADU and in every 3rd year of the affordability period (not tenancy), household composition, income and income from assets must be verified via third-party verification or other forms of supporting documentation and kept in the tenant’s file. In other years, tenants must, at a minimum, self-certify to their anticipated income (including income from assets), family size, and composition. As part of the monitoring process, tenant files will be reviewed at initial occupancy of the project and every 3rd year thereafter. 1.13 Increases in Income The owner/agent must ensure that any household whose anticipated gross income exceeds 140% of the maximum income limit at recertification pays not less than the market or similar rent as the other non-ADUs in the development. A minimum notice of 60 days is required for increases to tenant rent. The unit must be marketed to eligible tenants when vacated. If the units are floating, the rent is increased, and the next available unit must be rented at affordable rates to an income eligible tenant. Conversely, the tenant whose income increase to above 140% of AMI could be relocated to a Market Rate unit if the affordable units are fixed. For units assisted with both AHP funds and Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), a tenant is not considered over income until income exceeds the applicable 140% LIHTC limit. When a tenant’s income exceeds the 140% LIHTC limit, the tenant’s rent is adjusted to the LIHTC rent limit if the project is 100% LIHTC or, if the project is mixed income, to the market rent for similar non-ADUs in the property. 1.14 Property Standards March 2020 Page 12 of 31 The owner/agent must keep all units in compliance with local codes and other applicable state and local building codes to ensure the units are decent, safe, and sanitary at all times. 1.15 Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan Owners/agents must adhere to Equal Opportunity, Affirmative Marketing, and Fair Housing practices in all marketing efforts, eligibility determinations and other transactions. The Equal Housing Opportunity logo or statement must be used in all advertising of vacant units (We do business in accordance with the Federal Fair Housing Law. It is illegal to discriminate against any person because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin). In addition to the federal protections mentioned above, the Minnesota Human Rights Act makes it illegal to discriminate against any person with respect to housing and real property, because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, disability, status with regard to public assistance, sexual orientation or familial status. A file must be maintained with all marketing efforts related to the property including newspaper ads, social service contacts, photos of signs posted, etc. Records will be reviewed during on site monitoring to ensure that all efforts follow federal requirements and are being adequately documented. 1.16 Fair Lease and Grievance Procedures Fair lease and grievance procedures should be objective. They should clearly state: • To whom a tenant should direct a complaint; • Who will investigate and/or respond to the complaint; and • By when the tenant should expect to receive a response. Chapter 2 – Maintaining the Unit Mix March 2020 Page 13 of 31 Chapter 2 – Maintaining the Unit Mix 2.01 Fixed Affordable Dwelling Units Properties with units that are not comparable in terms of size, amenities and features must have fixed ADUs. Fixed ADUs means specific units are designated as the ADUs for the duration of the affordability period. Owner/Agent must maintain these specific units as the ADUs. Maintaining the required number of ADUs, is called complying with the unit mix requirements. At no time will non-ADUs be subject to AHP rent and income requirements when the ADUs are fixed. When an owner/agent recertifies a tenant’s income, the tenant’s income may have increased. A tenant is considered “over income” in the AHP when: • The tenant occupies an ADU and the tenant income increases to 140% of the current income limit for that family size; or • For ADUs that are also LIHTC units, a tenant is considered “over income” when its income goes over 140% of the qualifying tax credit election (Average Income, 50% or 60%) for that unit. When a tenant is over income, the unit that the tenant occupies is considered temporarily out of compliance with the AHP’s occupancy and unit mix requirements. Temporary noncompliance due to an increase in an existing tenant’s income is permissible if the owner/agent takes specific steps to restore the correct unit mix in the property as soon as possible. When the tenant’s income exceeds the AHP’s income limit (140%), the unit rent also must be adjusted. The owner/agent cannot terminate the lease immediately if the tenant’s income has increased above the AHP income limit. Instead, the owner/agent may extend /renew the lease for up to six months. If the tenant remains over income at the time of the next recertification, a 60-day notice to vacate may be issued to the tenant. If the tenant is determined to be under the AHP income limit at the time of recertification, the unit is considered back in compliance. 2.02 Floating Affordable Dwelling Units Properties with units that are comparable in terms of size, amenities and features can have floating ADUs. Properties with floating ADUs must maintain the required number of ADUs throughout the POA; however, the initial ADUs do not have to remain as ADUs throughout the POA. When ADUs float, the specific units that carry the ADU designation may change, or float, among assisted and non-assisted units during the POA. If/when an initial ADU goes out of compliance due to a tenant’s income going over the AHP (or LIHTC) income limit, a non-ADU can replace the out of compliance ADU if the tenant income and unit rent of the non-ADU meet the ADU requirements. In other words, the ADU designation “floats” to another unit. March 2020 Page 14 of 31 For example, if a property has an over-income tenant in an ADU, when the next non-ADU comparable unit becomes available, it will be designated as an ADU and rented to an income eligible tenant. The unit occupied by the over income tenant is redesignated as a market rate unit. Maintaining the required number of comparable ADUs is called complying with the unit mix requirements. When recertifying a tenant’s income, an owner/agent may find that the tenant’s income has increased. A tenant is considered “over income” when: • The tenant occupies an ADU and the tenant income increases over the current AHP income limit (140% AMI) for that family size; or • In ADUs that are also LIHTC units, a tenant is considered “over income” when its income increases to 140% or more of the qualifying tax credit election (50% or 60%) for that unit. When a tenant is over income, the unit that the tenant occupies is considered temporarily out of compliance with the AHP’s unit mix requirements. Temporary noncompliance due to an increase in an existing tenant’s income is permissible if the owner/agent takes specific steps to restore the required unit mix in the property. The rents of the over income tenants can be adjusted. When redesignating units in a property with floating ADUs, owner/agent can choose to substitute a unit that is equal or “greater” than the original ADU, but generally they cannot substitute one that is “lesser”. A lesser unit can be substituted only when doing so preserves the original unit mix. A greater unit is one that might be considered preferable because of larger size or additional bedrooms. The goal is to maintain the same number and type of ADUs as were designated originally. Therefore, if an owner/agent makes a substitution that is “greater,” it later can substitute an available unit that is “lesser” to restore the original unit mix. Once a comparable non-ADU unit is designated as the new ADU, the unit with the over income tenant is redesignated as a non-ADU or market rate unit. At this point, the owner/agent may adjust the tenant’s rent without regard to the AHP rent requirements (although requirements from other funding sources still may apply). Rent increases are subject to the terms of the lease. Note, a tenant in a floating ADU whose income exceeds AHP income limit is not required to pay more than the market rent for a comparable, unassisted unit in the property. The owner/agent cannot terminate the lease based on the tenant’s increase in income. March 2020 Page 15 of 31 Chapter 3 – General Occupancy Guidelines 3.01 Qualification of Applicants Applicants for ADUs shall be advised early in their initial visit to the property that there are maximum income limits that apply to these units. They also will be made aware that the anticipated income of all persons expecting to occupy the unit must be verified and included on a Resident Income Certification form prior to occupancy, and that tenant income and student status will be reviewed annually. If an individual is enrolled as a student at an institution of higher education, is under the age of 24, is not a veteran, is not married, is not a person with disabilities, and does not have a dependent child, in order to be eligible for a ADU, the student must be individually income eligible and the student’s parents (the parents individually or jointly) must be income eligible unless the student can demonstrate his or her independence from parents. AHP has adopted the section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program restrictions on student participation found at 24 CFR 5.612, which exclude any student that: 1. Is enrolled in a higher education institution. 2. Is under the age of 24. 3. Is not a veteran of the US Military. 4. Is not married**. 5. Does not have a dependent child(ren). 6. Is not a person with disabilities. 7. Is not otherwise individually eligible, or has parents who, individually or jointly, are not eligible on the basis of income. **Effective August 23, 2013, same-sex marriages are recognized as marriages for student eligibility purposes. To determine a student’s independence from his or her parents, the owner should consider all of the following: 1. The individual must be of legal contract age under state law; and 2. The individual must have established a household separate from parents or legal guardians for at least one year prior to application for occupancy, or the individual must meet the U.S. Department of Education’s definition of an independent student; and 3. The individual must not be claimed as a dependent by parents or legal guardians pursuant to IRS regulations; and 4. The individual must obtain a certification of the amount of financial assistance that will be provided by parents, signed by the individual/s providing the support. This certification is required even if no assistance will be provided. March 2020 Page 16 of 31 To document a student’s independence from parents: 1. Review and verify previous address information to determine evidence of a separate household, or verify the student meets the U.S. Department of Education’s definition of “independent student”; and 2. Review prior year income tax returns to verify if a parent or guardian has claimed the student as a dependent (except if the student meets the Department of Education’s definition of “independent student”); and 3. Verify income provided by a parent by requiring a written certification from the individual providing the support. Certification is also required if the parent/s is providing no support to the student. Financial assistance that is provided by persons not living in the unit is part of annual income. Verification of student eligibility must be maintained in the tenant file along with the income certification. 3.02 Eligibility Determination A fully completed Household Questionnaire is critical to an accurate determination of eligibility. The information furnished on the application should be used as a tool to determine all sources of anticipated income and assets. After the tenant completes the Household Questionnaire, the owner/agent must have all income verified by obtaining source documentation (award letters, offers of employment, W- 2’s, check stubs (not paycheck), bank statements, investment records, etc.) or by a third-party (public agency, employer, financial institution). If total cash value of assets is less than $50,000, assets can be self-certified using the Under $50,000 Certification. Assets exceeding $50,000 must be third-party verified. The application, income and asset verifications, and lease are to be executed prior to move in. All occupants in an ADU must be certified and have a valid lease on file. All household members age 18 and over must sign all required documents. 3.03 Change in Household Composition If a tenant in an ADU (no LIHTC) wishes to have an additional person move into the unit within the first 6 months of occupancy, the following steps must be taken: 1. The prospective tenant must complete a Household Questionnaire and allow time for verification of income and assets as required of the initial tenant; and 2. The prospective tenant's income must be added to the current tenant's certification and a determination made as to whether the new household is still within the AHP income guidelines. If the new household income exceeds the guidelines, then once proper notice is given, the tenant must pay the market rate. If the ADU is floating, the ADU designation must be floated to another eligible unit. The new rent of the now over income household cannot exceed market rent for a comparable unassisted unit. The tenant file shall also be documented when any household member vacates the unit. March 2020 Page 17 of 31 3.04 Minimum Lease Requirements Initial tenant leases, including a signed and dated AHP lease addendum (if applicable), must be on file and must specify a term of at least 12 months. Subsequent leases may have a shorter term, with written mutual agreement. Leases must not contain any of the prohibited lease terms. Any non-renewal or termination of leases must be in accordance with the lease and/or AHP lease addendum. Owners/agents must comply with the lease requirements found in Section 601 of the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act (VAWA) of 2013. HRA highly encourages owners/agents to use the VAWA Lease Addendum, form HUD-91067 or its successor VAWA Lease Addendum form. In general, owner/agent may not construe an incident of actual or threatened domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking as a serious or repeated violation of a lease term by the victim, or threatened victim, as good cause for terminating tenancy. However, in accordance with VAWA 2013, owner/agent may bifurcate a lease to terminate the tenancy of an individual who is a tenant or lawful occupant and engages in criminal activity directly relating to domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking against another lawful occupant living in the unit or other affiliated individual as defined in the VAWA 2013. Owner/Agent should include a copy of HUD-5382 form with each tenancy termination or eviction notice to allow an individual to certify that he or she is a victim of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault or stalking. The form is to be completed and submitted to owner/agent within 14 business days or an agreed upon extension date for the individual to receive protection under the VAWA. 3.05 House Rules Developing a set of house rules is a good practice. The decision about whether to develop house rules for a property rests solely with the owner/agent. If house rules are listed in the lease as an attachment, then they must be attached to the lease. By identifying allowable and prohibited activities in housing units and common areas, the owner/agent provides a structure for treating tenants equitably and for making sure tenants treat each other with consideration. House rules also are beneficial in keeping properties safe and clean and making them more appealing and livable for the tenants. They also are extremely beneficial if it becomes necessary to evict a tenant for inappropriate behavior. For more information on House Rules, refer to Chapter 6-9 of the HUD 4350.3 REV 1, Change 4 Handbook. 3.06 Number of Persons Per Unit There is no federal regulation governing the number of persons allowed to occupy a unit based on size; however, at initial occupancy ADUs will have a minimum requirement of at least one person per bedroom. It is important, though, to be consistent when accepting or rejecting applications. It is required that the owner/agent determine the minimum and maximum number of people that will be allowed to occupy each size unit and put that formula in writing as part of the Tenant Selection Plan and submit the Plan to the HRA or designated agent for approval. The owner/agent may refer to the HUD Handbook 4350.3 REV 1, Change 4, Chapter March 2020 Page 18 of 31 3-23, regarding occupancy standards. By following the standards described, owners/agents can ensure that applicants and tenants are housed in appropriately sized units in a fair and consistent manner. 3.07 Tenant Selection Plan Owner/Agent must develop a formal written policy that clearly states the procedures and criteria the owner/agent will consistently apply in drawing applicants from the waiting list, screening for suitability for tenancy, and implementing income targeting requirements. The Tenant Selection Plan must state if there is an elderly restriction (“seniors only” building). In accordance with the VAWA of 2013, the selection criteria cannot deny admission on the basis that the applicant has been a victim of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault or stalking. Owner/Agent should provide to each applicant/tenant HUD form 5382or its successor form to allow the applicant/tenant to provide information regarding his or her status as a victim of domestic violence, dating violence or stalking. Owners/agents may refer to the HUD Handbook 4350.3 REV 1, Change 4, Chapter 4, when developing a tenant selection plan. HRA will review the Tenant Selection Plan as part of its monitoring process. 3.08 Government Data Practices Act Disclosure Statement Form In working with applicants and tenants, the owner/agent warrants compliance with applicable data privacy laws and regulations including the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, which sets policies on the information that can be obtained, stored and/or released in connection with public programs. To comply with this law, the AHP Government Data Practices Act Statement form must be kept in each tenant's permanent file. Note that this is not a release authorization for verification of income and assets and must not be used as such. Each adult household member’s name must be printed clearly at the top in the box provided. An unsigned and/or undated form is not valid and will be noted as insufficient at time of file inspection. 1. The form is to be signed one time and is valid as long as the resident lives at the property and participates in the program(s) identified in item #2 on page 1 of the form. If a resident moves from one unit to another, the original signed and dated form should be moved to the file for the new unit. A copy should be kept in the move out file for the old unit. 2. A valid form must include all relevant attachments. Some properties or units within a property may require 2 or more attachments for multiple programs. 3. Only one form is needed per unit as long as the head of household, spouse, co-head, and all household members over the age of 18 have signed and dated the form. 4. If an adult is added to the household or a minor reaches age 18, they must be added to, sign, and date the original form. It is not necessary to complete a new form. 5. A copy of the form should be made available to the applicant/tenant. It is acceptable to give them an unsigned copy. 6. For new residents, the form should be completed at the time of initial application. March 2020 Page 19 of 31 A Government Data Practices Act Disclosure form that can be used for all ADUs is available on the HRA website. 3.09 Income Verification At initial occupancy, owner/agent must determine whether prospective tenant(s) of ADUs qualify as low income households. Income eligibility is based on anticipated income as defined at 24 CFR 5.609 (Section 8). When collecting income verification documentation, owner/agent must consider any likely changes in income. Owner/Agent must follow appropriate steps in determining whether households are eligible prior to admittance. Minnesota Housing provides sample verifications and other forms to assist owners/agents in qualifying eligible tenants. The release of information (at top of form) must be completed and signed by the person who is the subject of the verification prior to sending the form to an employer or other income source. Completed and returned verifications are used to calculate and document income. An Income and Asset Calculation Worksheet form also is available and can be used to assist in showing the individual calculations of income and asset income. This is highly recommended and will assist an inspector during a file review. This form should be dated and signed by the owner/agent. 3.10 Gross Annual Household Income Gross annual income for households living in ADUs shall be determined in a manner consistent with Section 8 of the U.S. Housing Act of 1937. Note that the information below only provides a summary. Owners and managers must use current circumstances to project income, unless verification forms or other verifiable documentation indicate that an imminent change will occur. For guidance in this section and in determination of tenant income, the HUD Handbook 4350.3, Occupancy Requirements of Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs, is used and is recommended as a reference guide. The HUD Handbook 4350.3 and HUD notices can be obtained by visiting HUD’s website: http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/administration/hudclips/handboo ks/h sgh/4350.3. The determination of annual income must include all types of income in the amount anticipated to be received by the tenant in the 12 months following certification/ recertification. Owner/Agent should use current circumstances to project income, unless verification forms or other verifiable documentation indicate that a change will occur (increase/decrease in rate of pay and/or hours). However, if the owner/agent is unable to determine annual income using current information because the family reports little to no income, or because income fluctuates, the owner/agent may average past actual income received or earned within the last 12 months before the certification date to calculate annual income. March 2020 Page 20 of 31 3.11 Factors that Affect Household Size When determining family size for occupancy, the owner/agent must include the following individuals who currently are not living in the unit: • Children temporarily absent due to placement in a foster home; • Children in joint custody arrangements who are present in the household 50% or more of the time; • Children who are away at school but who live with the family during school recesses; • Unborn children of pregnant women. When a pregnant woman is an applicant, the unborn child is included in the size of the household and is included for purposes of determining the maximum allowable income. The rental application should ask the following question: “Will there be any changes in household composition within the next 12-month period?” If an applicant answers that a child is expected (birth, foster or adoption), the owner/agent should explain to the applicant this is an additional household member and use the corresponding income limit, and self-certification of additional member should be used as documentation within the initial certification. • Children who are in the process of being adopted; • Temporarily absent family members who still are considered family members. For example, the owner/agent may consider a family member who is working in another state on assignment to be temporarily absent. Persons on active military duty are considered temporarily absent (except if the person is not the head, co-head or spouse or has no dependents living in the unit). If the person on active military duty is the head, co-head, or spouse, or if the spouse or dependents of the person on active military duty resides in the unit, that person’s income must be counted in full; • Family members in the hospital or rehabilitation facility for periods of limited or fixed duration. These persons are temporarily absent as defined above. Persons permanently confined to a hospital or nursing home are not considered household members. When determining family size for establishing income eligibility, the owner/agent must include all persons living in the unit except the following: • Live-in aides • Children of live-in aides o A live-in aide/attendant is a person who resides with one or more elderly persons, near-elderly persons, or persons with disabilities, and who:  Is determined to be essential to the care and well-being of the person(s);  Is not obligated for the support of the person(s); and  Would not be living in the unit except to provide the necessary supportive services. While a relative may be a live-in aide/attendant, s/he must meet the above requirements, especially the last. The live-in aide qualifies for occupancy only if the individual needing supportive services requires the aide’s services and remains a tenant. The live-in aide may not March 2020 Page 21 of 31 qualify for continued occupancy as a remaining family member. The owner/agent must obtain verification from the person’s physician, psychiatrist or other medical practitioner or health care provider that the live-in aide is needed to provide the necessary supportive services essential to the care and well-being of the person and should not add the attendant to the lease. The owner/agent may not require applicants or tenants to provide access to confidential medical records or to submit to a physical examination. Some households may include other persons who are considered family members for the purposes of determining household size and income eligibility, including: • Foster adults • Foster children Please see Appendix A for more detail on whose income is counted, what is counted as income and what is not, and how to account for income generated by assets. 3.12 General Income Verification Requirements All income and asset sources must be disclosed on the eligibility application and verified. A properly completed application must be used as the basis for determining what verifications will be necessary. The application, along with all supporting documentation and the Resident Income Certification, will be reviewed by HRA staff or its agent during a tenant file review. The following describes the types of third-party verification in order of acceptability: 1. Third-party verification from source (written): a. An original or authentic document generated by a third-party source that is dated within six months from the date of receipt by the owner/agent. Documents may be in possession of the tenant (or applicant), and commonly are referred to as tenant provided documents. These documents are considered third-party verification because they originated from a third-party source. Examples of tenant provided documentation that may be used include, but are not limited to: pay stubs, payroll summary report, employer notice/letter of hire/termination, SSA benefit letter, bank statements, child support payment stubs, welfare benefit letters and/or printouts, and unemployment monetary benefit notices. Owner/Agent must consider the following when using tenant provided documentation: i. Is the document current? Documentation of public assistance may be inaccurate if it is not recent and does not show any changes in the family’s benefits or work and training activities. ii. Is the documentation complete? Owner/Agent may accept pay stubs to document employment income only if the applicant or tenant provides the most recent two months of consecutive pay stubs to illustrate variations in hours worked. Actual paychecks or copies of paychecks March 2020 Page 22 of 31 should never be used to document income because deductions are not shown on the paycheck. iii. Is the document an unaltered original? The greatest shortcoming of tenant provided documents as a verification source is their susceptibility to undetectable change through the use of high quality copying equipment. Documents with original signatures are the most reliable. Photocopied documents generally cannot be assumed to be reliable. 2. Written documentation sent directly to the third-party source by mail or electronically by fax, email or internet. Verification forms must contain a release authorization signed by the applicant/tenant. Do not use a blanket release authorization as this entitles the owner/agent to obtain information to which it is not entitled or needed for eligibility determination. The Data Practices Act Disclosure Statement is not a verification release. Applicants should be asked to sign two copies of each verification form. The second copy may be used if the first request has not been returned in a timely manner. Income verification requests must be sent directly to and from the source. They are never given to the tenant to obtain signatures. If the returned verifications do not contain complete information, owner/agent must follow up with the source to obtain complete information. Typical examples include failure to indicate interest rates, dates of anticipated raises, amounts of anticipated raises, etc. All pertinent information must be documented in the file and must also include the name, phone number and title of the contact, the name of the person accepting the information, and the date. The single form AHP Eligibility Verification may be used to document income and asset eligibility in lieu of separate verification(s) for each separate income or asset source, if the sole source of income is Housing Support. The AHP Eligibility Verification confirms receipt of Housing Support (formally known as GRH) since it identifies that the applicant is in fact qualified for income-based Medical Assistance (MA) through Minnesota’s Department of Human Services. (Housing Support recipients must have MA prior to obtaining housing grant funding). MA eligibility documents AHP eligibility because the Federal Poverty Guidelines (FPG) are significantly less than the LIHTC income limits. NCCP.org (NCCP.org/tools/converter/) defines poverty as a family income less than 100 percent of the federal poverty threshold, as determined by the U.S. Census Bureau; Low Income is defined as family income less than 200 percent of the poverty threshold. 3. Third-party verification from source (verbal). When clarifying information over the telephone, it is important to be certain that the person on the telephone is the party he or she claims to be. Generally, it is best to telephone the verification source rather than to accept verification from a source calling the property management office. Verbal verification must be documented in the file. When verifying information by phone, the owner/agent must record and include in the tenant’s file the following information: March 2020 Page 23 of 31 a. Third-party’s name, position, and contact information; b. Information reported by the third-party; c. Name of the person who conducted the telephone interview; and d. Date and time of the telephone call. 4. Self Certification An owner/agent may accept a tenant’s notarized statement or signed affidavit regarding the veracity of information submitted only if the information cannot be verified by another acceptable verification method. In these instances, the owner/agent must document the file why third-party verification was not available. The owner/agent may witness the tenant signature(s) in lieu of a notarized statement or affidavit. The following describes use of electronic information when used as third-party verification. Electronic Verification. The owner/agent may obtain accurate third-party written verification by facsimile, email, or Internet, if adequate effort is made to ensure that the sender is a valid third-party source. a. Facsimile. Information sent by fax is most reliable if the owner/agent and the verification source agree to use this method in advance during a telephone conversation. The fax should include the company name and fax number of the verification source. b. Email. Similar to faxed information, information verified by email is more reliable when preceded by a telephone conversation and/or when the email address includes the name of an appropriate individual and firm. c. Internet. Information verified on the Internet is considered third-party verification if the owner/agent is able to view web-based information from a reputable source on the computer screen. Use of a printout from the Internet may also be adequate verification in many instances. Steps used to obtain written verification as described in 1, 2 and 3 above must be documented to show just cause for using other types of verification. The owner/agent must include the following documents in the tenant file: 1. A written note explaining why third-party verification is not possible, signed and dated by the applicant/resident. 2. A copy of the date-stamped original request that was sent to the third-party. 3. Written notes or documentation indicating follow up efforts to reach the third-party to obtain verification. 4. A written note indicating the request has been outstanding without a response from the third-party. Note: If a tenant is employed by a business owned by the tenant's family or is employed by the property owner/agent or the management company, a copy of a recent pay stub verifying year- to- date earnings also is required. March 2020 Page 24 of 31 Upon receipt of all verifications, owner/agent must determine if the resident is qualified for participation in the AHP. All verifications should be reviewed, and calculations made as necessary. 3.13 Corrections to Documents Sometimes it is necessary to make corrections or changes to documents. A document that has been altered with correction fluid or "white out" will not be accepted by HRA. When a change is needed on a document, the person making the correction must draw a line through the incorrect information, write or type the correct wording or number, and have all parties initial and date the change. 3.14 Effective Term of Verifications Verifications of any kind are valid for 6 months prior to an ADU tenant’s move in date or recertification date. 3.15 Over Income Households When determining eligibility to occupy an ADU, the household's gross income must always be considered. However, if a tenant goes over the income guidelines of 140% of household income at recertification, the owner/agent must raise the over income tenant’s rent to reflect Fair Market Rent, or relocate tenant to a Market Rate Unit, as soon as the lease permits in accordance with the terms of the lease (see Chapter 2). The AHP does not require interim rent adjustments. 3.16 Annual Recertification All households occupying an ADU must be recertified at least annually from the date of occupancy. Annual recertifications must be effective on or before the occupancy anniversary date of the previous certification. Owner/Agent may align recertification dates with other program certifications or so that all units in the property are recertified at one time during the year. However, if a period of twelve (12) months passes without a recertification being completed for any ADU, the unit is considered out of compliance. Owner/Management may request an annual schedule whereby all tenants are recertified during the same month however before making changes to schedule, an email request must be made, and approved by the City first. The requirement to recertify is included in an ADU lease or addendum, tenant refusal to comply can be considered a violation of the lease and is grounds for termination. Income must be third-party verified in every 3rd year of the affordability period, not tenancy. Example: Every Third Year Full Certification Property ABC received Certificate of Occupancy on 11/1/2019  Period of Affordability (POA) for Property ABC will be a total of 15 years starting on 11/1/2019 and ending on 11/1/2034 March 2020 Page 25 of 31 Amanda Johnson Moved onto Property ABC on 12/1/2019 In 2019 (POA Year One): Management verifies income using SSA Benefits Award Letter, a copy of Amanda’s current PERA Benefit Letter (Pension Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota) and Under $50,000 Asset Verification to determine eligibility at Move In. All items must be third-party verified using source documents. In 2020 (POA Year Two): Amanda Johnson needs to complete her Annual Recertification but in POA Year Two for Property ABC, only a self-certification of income and asset, signed by all adult household members is needed. Use of the AHP Self-Certification of Income & Asset form can be used instead of third-party verifications during this non-3rd year. Note: Move In certifications for eligibility must always third-party verify using source documents. In 2021 (POA Year Three): Amanda Johnson needs to complete her Annual Recertification but in POA Year Three for Property ABC, only a self-certification of income and asset, signed by all adult household members is needed. Use of the AHP Self-Certification of Income & Asset form can be used instead of third-party verifications during this non-3rd year. Note: Move In certifications for eligibility must always third-party verify using source documents. In 2022 (Year Four): The Annual Recertification requirement for this POA year at Property ABC states all income and assets reported by a household must be third-party verified using source documents. The AHP Self-Certification of Income & Asset is not eligible for use for any ADU at Property ABC. 3.17 Tenant Files Owner/Agent must maintain a tenant file for each ADU. All permanent documents must be kept together so they are accessible at each compliance review (income certification and supporting documentation, lease/AHP addendum, etc.). Annual recertification information, including the tenant questionnaires, release forms, verifications, and annual inspection reports must be grouped together by year, with the most recent year on top for review. The tenant files must contain the following: • HRA Government Data Practices Act Statement • Household Questionnaire • Acceptable verifications of income and assets • Verification of student eligibility if applicable • Resident Income Certification (Initial Certification and Annual Recertifications) • Signed lease agreement and AHP addendum (if needed) • Lead based paint acknowledgements (rental rehabilitation only; built pre-1978) All move out files should also contain the following: • Written 30-day (or greater) notice to vacate (if not available – document in file) March 2020 Page 26 of 31 • Security deposit refund (check number and date) or letter of intent to withhold security deposit within 14 days of move out Tenant records, including income verifications and development rents must be retained for the most recent three year period after the tenant moves out. March 2020 Page 27 of 31 Chapter 4 – Reporting Requirements The owner/agent must maintain a report of all tenants residing in each ADU at the time of application through the end of the affordability period and must submit annual reports to HRA in a form and manner requested by HRA. Annual compliance reports are due to HRA by March 1 or as otherwise specified by HRA, of each year during the affordability period. If the due date falls on a weekend or a holiday, reports are due the following business day. Reports and other required documents must be submitted as directed by HRA on an annual basis. 4.01 Annual Owner/Agent Certifications Complete the Owner/Agent Certification to certify compliance with AHP requirements for the preceding calendar year. Owner/Agent Certifications must be printed, signed and dated by the authorized Owner/Agent Representative, then scanned and submitted as directed by HRA. 4.02 Compliance Reports HRA or designated agents will monitor AHP compliance by reviewing annual Owner/Agent Certifications and analyzing compliance information submitted by the owner/agent. Failure to submit the Owner/Agent Certification and/or update the report on all units and their related activity by the due date will constitute noncompliance with the AHP and the related loan documents. 4.03 Utility Allowance Source Document Owners/Agents must submit the utility allowance source documents applicable to the reporting period. Multiple utility allowance source documents may apply to one reporting period. March 2020 Page 28 of 31 Chapter 5 – Compliance Inspections Compliance inspections (file reviews) will be conducted every 3 years. Inspections may be conducted more frequently if HRA determines it to be necessary based on concerns raised during a previous review or other information. The compliance inspection includes, but is not limited to, an inspection of at least 20%, but up to 50%, of the ADU tenant files (with a minimum of four (4) units). HRA will contact the owner/agent in advance to schedule the tenant file review. The property inspection and tenant file review may be conducted at the same time or may be conducted separately by different HRA staff. 5.01 Physical Inspections This program does not mandate inspections. Rental Licensing requires inspections every three years. 5.02 Review of Tenant Files and Property Records During the tenant file review, HRA staff will review Resident Income Certifications, third-party verifications or other forms of income documentation, leases, lead based paint disclosure forms, and other management information for selected units. HRA staff will also review the following property information: • Utility Allowances and supporting documentation • Current written tenant selection plan, occupancy policy and/or house rules if changes were made since the last review • Current lease and lease addenda/agreement(s) • Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan/Marketing Plans • Advertising • Equal Housing Opportunity posters, logos • Correspondence • Tenant ledgers for all units inspected March 2020 Page 29 of 31 Chapter 6 – Correction and Consequences of Non-Compliance If HRA does not receive the required certifications and/or compliance reports when due, or discovers by audit, inspection, or review, or in some other manner, that the property is not in compliance with the requirements of the AHP, or with the property’s loan documents, including the enforcement agreement, the HRA will notify the owner/agent as soon as possible. 6.01 Notice to Owner/Agent HRA or its designated agent will provide prompt written notice to the owner/agent of an AHP property if HRA does not receive the annual Owner/Agent Certification and income and occupancy report by the required due date. HRA or its designated agent also will notify the owner/agent if it does not receive or is not permitted to inspect the Resident Income Certifications, supporting documentation, and rent records, or discovers by inspection, review, or in some other manner, that the property is not in compliance with the requirements of the AHP or with the property’s loan documents, including the enforcement agreement. 6.02 Correction Period The correction period of 30-days will be set forth in a Notice of Noncompliance to the owner and its agent. HRA may extend the correction period if HRA determines there is good cause for granting the extension. Requests for an extension must be in writing from the owner/agent, must be received by HRA no later than the last day of the correction period identified on the Notice of Noncompliance, and must include an explanation of the efforts to correct the noncompliance and the reason the extension is needed. 6.03 Owner’s/Agent’s Response HRA will review the owner’s/agent’s response and supporting documentation, if any, to determine whether the noncompliance has been clarified, corrected or remains out of compliance. Clarified noncompliance is, for example, where income eligibility was not properly documented and the inspector cannot make a reasonable determination that the unit is in compliance but the owner/agent conducts a retroactive (re)certification which completely and clearly documents the sources of income and assets that were in place at the time the certification should have been effective, and applies income and rent limits that were in effect on that date. If documentation is complete and supports that the tenant was eligible as of the effective date, the file is considered clarified. Corrected noncompliance is when a violation is observed and there is a period of time during which the unit is out of compliance but the unit is brought back into compliance. For example, a late certification or re-certification is out of compliance on the certification due date, and back in compliance as of the date the last household member signs a retroactive Income Certification. March 2020 Page 30 of 31 Uncorrected noncompliance is a violation that is not corrected or clarified by the end of the correction period. Failure to correct all noncompliance could result in extension of the end of the POA, loss of Tax Increment Financing, or LURC tax treatment or other legal remedies. Persistent noncompliance also may impact the owner’s/agent’s eligibility for financing from the HRA under any or all its programs. March 2020 Page 31 of 31 Chapter 7 – Requests for Action 7.01 Sale or Transfer Any property owner must provide prior written notice to the HRA before sale or transfer of the property. The notice will provide that the new owner/agent acknowledges that the terms and conditions of the Affordable Housing Program as set forth in the governing documents recorded against the property remain in place. Attachments: •Current Rent Income Table •AFHMP Template – Pages 1-5 without HUD Signature •AHC Checklist •AHC Forms 05/03/2019Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Income Limits And Maximum Rents TAX_CREDIT_INCOME_LIMIT.RDF Date Run: Table L: Projects Placed in Service on or after 4/24/2019 Page 14 of 44 04/24/2019 04/24/2019 Hennepin Houston 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 14,000 21,000 28,000 35,000 42,000 49,000 56,000 11,020 16,530 22,040 27,550 33,060 38,570 44,080 16,000 24,000 32,000 40,000 48,000 56,000 64,000 12,580 18,870 25,160 31,450 37,740 44,030 50,320 18,000 27,000 36,000 45,000 54,000 63,000 72,000 14,160 21,240 28,320 35,400 42,480 49,560 56,640 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 15,720 23,580 31,440 39,300 47,160 55,020 62,880 21,600 32,400 43,200 54,000 64,800 75,600 86,400 16,980 25,470 33,960 42,450 50,940 59,430 67,920 23,200 34,800 46,400 58,000 69,600 81,200 92,800 18,240 27,360 36,480 45,600 54,720 63,840 72,960 24,800 37,200 49,600 62,000 74,400 86,800 99,200 19,500 29,250 39,000 48,750 58,500 68,250 78,000 26,400 39,600 52,800 66,000 79,200 92,400 105,600 20,760 31,140 41,520 51,900 62,280 72,660 83,040 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 350 525 700 875 1,050 1,225 1,400 275 413 551 688 826 964 1,102 375 562 750 937 1,125 1,312 1,500 295 442 590 737 885 1,032 1,180 450 675 900 1,125 1,350 1,575 1,800 354 531 708 885 1,062 1,239 1,416 520 780 1,040 1,300 1,560 1,820 2,080 408 613 817 1,021 1,226 1,430 1,635 580 870 1,160 1,450 1,740 2,030 2,320 456 684 912 1,140 1,368 1,596 1,824 640 960 1,280 1,600 1,920 2,240 2,560 503 754 1,006 1,258 1,509 1,761 2,013 700 1,050 1,400 1,750 2,100 2,450 2,800 550 825 1,100 1,375 1,650 1,925 2,200 County: County: Effective Date: Effective Date: 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 ---------- Income Limits By Household Size ---------- ---------- Income Limits By Household Size ---------- ---- Maximum Gross Rents By Bedroom Size(Post 1989) ---- ---- Maximum Gross Rents By Bedroom Size(Post 1989) ---- Note to all applicants/respondents: This form was developed with Nuance, the official HUD software for the creation of HUD forms. HUD has made available instructions for downloading a free installation of a Nuance reader that allows the user to fill-in and save this form in Nuance. Please see http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=nuancereaderinstall.pdf for the instructions. Using Nuance software is the only means of completing this form. Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan (AFHMP) - Multifamily Housing U.S. DepartmentofHousing andUrban Development OfficeofFairHousingandEqualOpportunity OMB Approval No. 2529­0013          (exp.12/31/2016) Previous editions are obsolete Page 1 of 8 Form HUD-935.2A (12/2011)  1a. Project Name & Address (including City, County, State & Zip Code)1b. Project Contract Number 1c. No. of Units 1d. Census Tract 1e. Housing/Expanded Housing Market Area 1f. Managing Agent Name, Address (including City, County, State & Zip Code), Telephone Number & Email Address 1g. Application/Owner/Developer Name, Address (including City, County, State & Zip Code), Telephone Number & Email Address 1h. Entity Responsible for Marketing (check all that apply) Owner Agent Other (specify) Position, Name (if known), Address ( including City, County, State & Zip Code), Telephone Number & Email Address 1i. To whom should approval and other correspondence concerning this AFHMP be sent? Indicate Name, Address (including City, State & Zip Code), Telephone Number & E-Mail Address. 2a. Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan Plan Type Date of the First Approved AFHMP: Reason(s) for current update: 2b. HUD-Approved Occupancy of the Project (check all that apply) Elderly Family Mixed (Elderly/Disabled)Disabled 2c. Date of Initial Occupancy 2d. Advertising Start Date Advertising must begin at least 90 days prior to initial or renewed occupancy for new construction and substantial rehabilitation projects. Date advertising began or will begin For existing projects, select below the reason advertising will be used: To fill existing unit vacancies To place applicants on a waiting list (which currently has individuals) To reopen a closed waiting list (which currently has individuals) Previous editions are obsolete Page 2 of 8 Form HUD-935.2A (12/2011) 3a. DemographicsofProjectandHousing Market AreaComplete and submit Worksheet 1. 3b.Targeted Marketing Activity Based on your completedWorksheet 1, indicate which demographic group(s) in the housing market area is/are least likely to apply for the housing without special outreach efforts. (check all that apply) White AmericanIndianorAlaskaNative Asian Black or African American Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Hispanic or Latino Persons with Disabilities FamilieswithChildren Other ethnic group, religion, etc. (specify) 4a.Residency Preference Is the owner requesting a residency preference? If yes, complete questions 1 through 5. If no, proceed to Block 4b. (1) Type (2) Is the residency preference area: The same as the AFHMP housing/expanded housing market area as identified in Block 1e? The same as the residency preference area of the local PHA in whose jurisdiction the project is located? (3) What is the geographic area for the residency preference? (4) What is the reason for having a residency preference? (5) How do you plan to periodically evaluate your residency preference to ensure that it is in accordance with the non-discrimination and equal opportunity requirements in 24 CFR 5.105(a)? Complete and submit Worksheet 2 when requesting a residency preference (see also 24 CFR 5.655(c)(1)) for residency preference requirements. The requirements in 24 CFR 5.655(c)(1) will be used by HUD as guidelines for evaluating residency preferences consistent with the applicable HUD program requirements. See also HUD Occupancy Handbook (4350.3) Chapter 4, Section 4.6 for additional guidance on preferences. 4b.Proposed Marketing Activities: Community Contacts CompleteandsubmitWorksheet3 to describeyour use of community contacts to market the project to those least likely to apply. 4c.Proposed Marketing Activities: Methods of Advertising Complete and submit Worksheet 4 to describe your proposed methods of advertising that will be used to market to those least likely to apply. Attach copies of advertisements, radio and television scripts, Internet advertisements, websites, and brochures, etc. Previous editions are obsolete Page 3 of 8 Form HUD-935.2A(12/2011) 5a. Fair Housing Poster The Fair Housing Poster must be prominently displayed in all offices in which sale or rental activity takes place (24 CFR 200.620(e)). Check below all locations where the Poster will be displayed. Rental Office RealEstate Office Model Unit Other (specify) 5b.Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan The AFHMP must be available for public inspection at the sales or rental office (24 CFR 200.625). Check below all locations where the AFHMP will be made available. Rental Office RealEstateOffice Model Unit Other (specify) 5c. Project Site Sign Project Site Signs, if any, must display in a conspicuous position the HUD approved Equal Housing Opportunity logo, slogan, or statement (24 CFR 200.620(f)). Check below all locations where the Project Site Sign will be displayed. Please submit photos of Project signs. RentalOffice RealEstate Office Model Unit EntrancetoProject Other (specify) The size of the Project Site Sign will be x The Equal Housing Opportunity logo or slogan or statement will be x       6. Evaluation of Marketing Activities Explain the evaluation process you will use to determine whether your marketing activities have been successful in attracting individuals least likely to apply, how often you will make this determination, and how you will make decisions about future marketing based on the evaluation process. Previous editions are obsolete Page 4 of 8 Form HUD-935.2A (12/2011) 7a.Marketing Staff What staff positions are/will be responsible for affirmative marketing? 7b.Staff Training and Assessment: AFHMP (1) Has staff been trained on the AFHMP? (2) Has staff been instructed in writing and orally on non­discrimination and fair housing policies as required by       24 CFR 200.620(c)? (3) If yes, who provides instruction on the AFHMP and Fair Housing Act, and how frequently? (4) Do you periodically assess staff skills on the use of the AFHMP and the application of the Fair Housing       Act?   (5)If yes, how and how often? 7c.Tenant Selection Training/Staff (1) Has staff been trained on tenant selection in accordance with the project’s occupancy policy, including any residency preferences? (2) What staff positions are/will be responsible for tenant selection? 7d.Staff Instruction/Training: Describe AFHM/Fair Housing Act staff training,already provided or to be provided, to whom it was/will be provided,content of training, and the dates of past and anticipated training.Please include copies of any AFHM/Fair Housing staff training materials. Previous editions are obsolete Page 5 of 8 Form HUD-935.2A (12/2011) 8. Additional Considerations:  Is there anything else you would like to tell us about your AFHMP to help ensure that your program is marketed to those least likely to apply for housing in your project? Please attach additional sheets, as needed. 9. Review and Update By signing this form, the applicant/respondent agrees to implement its AFHMP, and to review and update its AFHMP in accordance with the instructions to item 9 of this form in order to ensure continued compliance with HUD’s Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Regulations (see 24 CFR Part 200, Subpart M). I hereby certify that all the information stated herein, as well as any information provided in the accompaniment herewith, is true and accurate. Warning: HUD will prosecute false claims and statements. Conviction may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. (See 18 U.S.C. 1001, 1010, 1012; 31 U.S.C. 3729, 3802).     Signature of person submitting this Plan &Date of Submission (mm/dd/yyyy) Name (type or print) Title & Name of Company For HUD-Office of Housing Use Only Reviewing Official: For HUD-Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity Use Only Approval Disapproval Signature & Date (mm/dd/yyyy)Signature & Date (mm/dd/yyyy) Name(typeor print) Title Name(typeorprint) Title Head of Household Demographic Information Head of Household Demographics 1 of 1 AHP 02/2020 Instructions: This form is to be completed by the head of household only after occupancy has been approved. Your approval for occupancy will not be affected if you choose not to respond. The owner will submit this information to The City of Edina for assessment of households being served by its financing programs. Your cooperation is much appreciated. Housing Information (this section to be completed by owner/agent) Property Name Minnesota Housing D# Building Address Unit # Head of Household Information Name Date of birth (month/day/year) / / Ethnicity Hispanic or Latino Not Hispanic or Latino I choose not to respond Gender Female Male I choose not to respond Race (check all that apply) American Indian/Alaska Native Asian Black/African American Native Hawaiian/ Other Pacific Islander White I choose not to respond Number of household members Adults (including head of household) Children under age 18 residing in unit Is any household member mobility impaired requiring features of an accessible unit? Yes No I choose not to respond Is any household member a person with a disability other than mobility impairment? Yes No I choose not to respond Main source of household income (check only one) Salary/wages Self-employment Social Security Retirement /pension/annuity Alimony/child support Interest/dividends/rental income Unemployment/disability Public assistance No income Previous editions are obsolete form HUD-928.1 (6/2011) U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY We Do Business in Accordance With the Federal Fair Housing Law (The Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988) It is illegal to Discriminate Against Any Person Because of Race, Color, Religion, Sex,Handicap, Familial Status, or National Origin In the sale or rental of housing or residential lots In advertising the sale or rental of housing In the financing of housing In the provision of real estate brokerage services In the appraisal of housing Blockbusting is also illegal Anyone who feels he or she has beendiscriminated against may file a complaint ofhousing discrimination: 1-800-669-9777 (Toll Free) 1-800-927-9275 (TTY)              www.hud.gov/fairhousing  U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity Washington, D.C. 20410 AHP 02/2020 Attachment Affordable Housing Program (AHP) Part A (Required to determine eligibility) 1. Information regarding the household composition including the name(s) and age(s) of all members in the household. 2. Student status. 3. The amount and source of all earned and unearned income of all household members. 4. The type, value and income derived from all household assets. 5. The type, value and income derived from all household assets disposed of for less than fair market value within the past 2 years. 6. Current and/or previous housing history (for program eligibility, if applicable). Part B 1. Race 2. Ethnicity 3. Gender of head of household 4. Receipt of Public Assistance and Type of Assistance (MFIP, Section 8, GRH, etc.) 5. Homeless Household 6. Disabled Status 7. Household Type (single, elderly, disabled, etc.) AHP 02/2020 Verification of Eligibility – Affordable Housing Program TO: (Name and Address of Housing Support Division) FROM: (Name & Address of Owner/Management Agent) RE:________________________________ Email: ________________________________ Applicant/Tenant Full Name Contact: _______________at ( )___________ ___________________ Unit Number (Optional) Thank you for your prompt response. All information is confidential. PERMISSION FOR RELEASE OF INFORMATION Release: I hereby authorize the release of requested information. Information obtained under this consent is limited to information that is no older than 12 months. There are circumstances which would require the owner to verify information that is up to 5 years old, which would be authorized by me on a separate consent with explanation, attached to a copy of this consent. Signature of Applicant/Tenant Date MN-DHS Housing Supports and Services Division, please fill in all blanks. Does the above Applicant/Tenant receive benefits under one of these two income-based Housing Programs outlined below? If Yes, what type of benefit program does s/he participate in? and/or Effective date of benefits: Additional remarks: Housing Support and Services Provider: Print Your Name: Title: Signature: Date: Telephone #: Fax #: Email: THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HOUSING SUPPORT & SERVICES DIVISION  Yes  No  Housing Support  Minnesota Supplemental Aid (MSA Housing Assistance) AHP 02/2020 Government Data Practices Act Disclosure Statement Print name(s) of Household Members signing this form: The City of (“City”) that provided the funding for the development of the property listed below is asking for this private information that relates to your application to occupy, or continue to occupy, a unit in the following property (“Property”). Property Name: Some of the information you are being asked to provide may be considered private or confidential under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (MGDPA), Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13. Section 13.04(2) of this law requires that you be notified of the matters included in this Disclosure Statement before you are asked to provide that information. The owner/agent of the Property may also ask you to supply information that relates to your application. The owner’s/agent’s request for information is not governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. 1. The City of Edina, Minnesota for the Affordable Housing Program (AHP) is asking for information necessary for the administration and management of a local program to provide housing for low income families. Some of the information may be used to establish your eligibility to initially occupy, or to continue to occupy, a unit in the Property. Other information may be used to assist the City in the evaluation and management of some of the programs it operates. 2. As part of your application, you are asked to supply the information contained in the following attachment. Attachment 1 – Inclusionary Housing Program The Attachment has two parts: Part A and Part B 3. The information asked for under Part A of the attachment may be used by the City and/or owner/agent to establish your eligibility to participate in the Inclusionary Housing Program or occupy an affordable dwelling unit in the Property. If you refuse to supply any portion of the information asked for under Part A, you may not qualify for initial or continued occupancy of a unit in the Property. 4. The information asked for under Part B will help the City in the evaluation and management of some of the programs it operates and your supplying of this information will be helpful to the City. AHP 02/2020 Failure to provide any of the information asked for under Part B will NOT affect whether or not you qualify for initial or continued occupancy of a unit in the Property. 5. The owner/agent may also ask for information to determine whether or not it will rent a unit in the Property to you. If you supply, or refuse to supply, any information requested by the owner/agent, it will NOT affect a decision by the City, but could affect the owner’s/agent’s decision to rent a unit to you. The determination by the owner/agent is separate from the City’s determination and the City does not participate, in any way, in the owner’s/agent’s decision. 6. All of the information that you supply will be accessible to staff of the City (and its agents) and may be made available to staff of the Office of the Minnesota Attorney General, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and other persons and/or governmental entities who may have statutory authority to review the information, investigate specific conduct, and/or take appropriate legal action including but not limited to law enforcement agencies, courts and other regulatory agencies. The information may also be provided by the City to the owner’s management agents of the Property. 7. This Disclosure Statement remains in effect for as long as you occupy a unit in the Property and are a participant in the program(s) identified above. I was (We were) supplied with a copy of and have read this Government Data Practices Act Disclosure Statement and the Attachment identified above. Head of Household, Spouse, Co-Head and all household members age 18 or older must sign and date: Applicant/Tenant signature Date Applicant/Tenant signature Date Applicant/Tenant signature Date Applicant/Tenant signature Date Applicant/Tenant signature Date AHP 02/2020 AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM (AHP) LEASE ADDENDUM Resident Name: Address: Lease Date: The Property in which you are leasing received funding from the Affordable Housing Program. This program is designed to provide housing to low income individuals and families. This addendum will be in effect for the duration of your occupancy. By signing this Agreement, you and all adult household members acknowledge that you have read, understand and agree to the following provisions: 1. Affordable Housing Program. The Unit must comply with the Affordable Housing Program. Resident's rights under the Lease are subject to Program requirements. 2. Unit Occupancy. Only the residents named on the Lease are permitted to occupy the unit. 3. Income Certification. Resident has executed an Income Certification Form prior to moving into the Unit, and Resident shall complete and execute further Income Certification Forms at Management's request not less than annually hereafter. Upon Management’s request, Resident shall certify Resident’s household income and/or assets to Management or any governmental or quasi-governmental agency in a manner satisfactory to Management. 4. Recertified Income. Resident acknowledges that the annual recertification of Resident's household income must meet the limitations imposed by the Program. (Resident’s initials) ________ 5. Information Supplied. Resident certifies that the information supplied by Resident to determine Resident's qualifications to rent the Unit, including Resident's Application and Income Certification, is accurate, complete, and true in all respects. Submission of inaccurate, incomplete, or false information at any time is a breach of lease for which Resident can be evicted. 6. Increased Income. If, upon annual recertification, Resident's household income exceeds 140% of the applicable Program limit, Management may meet with Resident to review the status of the household’s qualification under the Program. If the household no longer qualifies, Management may terminate Resident’s lease. 7. Certain Changes. Resident shall notify Management immediately in writing if Resident's household size changes, anyone in Resident’s household becomes a full-time student, or Resident begins to receive HUD assistance. Management may immediately terminate this Lease if Resident’s student status disqualifies the Unit under the Program. Management may adjust Resident's rent and/or utility allowance if Resident begins to receive HUD assistance. (Resident’s initials) _________ 8. Student Eligibility. AHP adopted the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program restrictions on student participation found at 24 CFR 5.612 and excludes any individual that: AHP 02/2020 1. Is enrolled in a higher education institution; AND 2. Is under the age of 24; and 3. Is not a veteran of the US Military; and 4. Is not married*; and 5. Does not have a dependent child(ren); and 6. Is not a person with disabilities; and 7. Is not otherwise individually eligible, or has parents who, individually or jointly, are not eligible on the basis of income * Effective August 1, 2013 same-sex marriages are recognized as marriages for student eligibility purposes. ALL RESIDENTS MUST IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO MANAGEMENT ANY CHANGE IN STUDENT STATUS. (Resident’s initials) __________ 9. Cooperation with Management. Resident shall cooperate with Management so that Management complies with the Program. Resident will timely respond to Management requests related to Program documents, verifications, and certifications. This includes but is not limited to timely attending meetings, signing verifications, and providing requested information. Resident agrees to sign a new lease upon the completion of annual certifications, if requested or required by Management. 10. Termination/Non-Renewal. Management may terminate or refuse to renew the Lease or file an eviction action for the following reasons:  Serious or repeated violation of the Lease. This includes but is not limited to Resident’s violation of this Agreement. (Resident’s initials) _______  Violation of applicable federal, state, or local law. (Resident’s initials) _______  Refusal/Failure to complete paperwork required by the Program. (Resident’s initials) _______  Other good cause, including if Resident’s continued occupancy of the Unit violates Program requirements. (Resident’s initials) _______ I have read and agree to the provisions above and understand that failure to comply with these provisions constitutes material non-compliance with this lease and establishes good cause for termination, nonrenewal of the lease, or eviction action. ________________________________________________ __________________________ Resident’s Signature Date ________________________________________________ __________________________ Resident’s Signature Date ________________________________________________ __________________________ Management’s Signature Date AHP 02/2020 AHP Rental Application Applicant Information Name: Date of birth: SSN: Phone: Current address: City: State: ZIP Code: Own Rent (Please circle) Monthly payment or rent: How long? Previous address: City: State: ZIP Code: Owned Rented (Please circle) Monthly payment or rent: How long? Co-applicant Information Name: Date of birth: SSN: Phone: Current address: City: State: ZIP Code: Own Rent (Please circle) Monthly payment or rent: How long? Previous address: City: State: ZIP Code: Owned Rented (Please circle) Monthly payment or rent: How long? Income and Asset Total Monthly Income (Include all family gross income): $ Income Sources (check all that apply)  Wages/Self-Employment  SSI/SSA  Pension/Annuity  Child Support  Investment/Interest Income  Workers Compensation  TANF/Public Assistance  Other________________ Value of Family Assets (Assets include all bank accounts, investment accounts, and real estate): $ Emergency Contact Name of a person not residing with you: Address: City: State: ZIP Code: Phone: References Name: Address: Phone: I authorize the verification of the information provided on this form as to my credit and source/s of income. Signature of applicant: Date: Signature of co-applicant: Date: AHP 02/2020 RESIDENT INCOME CERTIFICATION For use by eligible Affordable Housing Program (AHP) properties only Property Name: ____________________________ Effective Date: _________________ Household Composition: Anticipated Gross Household Income (Annual Amounts): Household Member Name Wages/Salaries/Self- Employment Benefits/Pensions TANF/Public Assistance Other Income Annual Gross Income: $ $ $ $ Total Annual Gross Income: $ Household Asset and Asset Income: Household Member Name Asset Description Current Cash Value of Asset Actual Income from Assets Total Cash Value: Total Income from Assets: $ (A)$ Enter Total Cash Value if over $50,000 $______________ Passbook Rate: X .06% = (B)$_____________ Imputed Income Enter the greater of the Total Income from Assets (A) OR Imputed Income (B): This will be the Total Income from Assets: $________________ Total Annual Income Annual Income (total of all actual income and income from assets): $________________ Head of Household Name Leased Address Total Number of Occupants AHP 02/2020 Rent Amounts: Leased Rent Amount: $________________ Monthly Utility Allowance: $________________ Gross Monthly Rent: (Leased Rent + Utility Allowance) $________________ Student Status: Are any household members, a student at an institution of higher education?  Yes  No If Yes, enter # as shown on the student form AHP Student Self-Certification 1. FT Student 2. Disabled 3. At least 24 years of age 4. Veteran of United States Military 5. Married 6. Dependent 7. Living Independently from Parents 8. Graduate or Professional Student 9. Orphan or Ward of the Court 10. Vulnerable Youth 11. Independent via unusual circumstances #_________________ After all verifications of income and/or assets have been received and calculated, each household member age 18 or older must sign and date the Resident Income Certification. For move-in, it is recommended that the Resident Income Certification be signed no earlier than 5 days prior to the effective date of the certification. I/we hereby affirm that the foregoing information is true and complete to the best of my/our knowledge and authorize the Landlord to make inquires to verify the statements herein. I/we further understand that any intentional misrepresentation in this self-certification might result in a default in the rental agreement and/or eviction of the household. If any of the aforementioned changes, I/we agree to notify the Landlord immediately. All household members age 18 or older must sign and date below: Signature: ______________________________________________ Date: _________________________________ Signature: ______________________________________________ Date: _________________________________ Signature: ______________________________________________ Date: _________________________________ Signature and Date of Owner/Representative: Signature: ______________________________________________ Date: _________________________________ Affordable Housing Program (AHP) RESIDENT NOTIFICATION LETTER As a resident of (name of property), a property funded by the CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota statutory city, and the HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, you have certain rights stated in your lease and the attached Lease Rider. Your landlord must follow city and state rules for the Affordable Housing Program. One of the important protections provided by federal law is that you cannot be evicted from your home or have your tenancy terminated without good reason or “good cause.” Your landlord may not evict you or terminate your tenancy (including refusing to renew your lease) without good cause. Good cause is (a) serious or repeated violation(s) of the material terms and conditions of your lease. The landlord must state, in writing, the good cause in any eviction, lease non-renewal or termination of tenancy notice. If you did not do what your landlord claims in the notice, or if you think it was not serious enough for your lease to be terminated or not renewed, you can ask the landlord if there is an appeal process. If there is no appeal process, you may request that the termination be retracted and discuss your reasons why. If you receive a notice of eviction, you have a right to contest the eviction in court by explaining to the judge why you disagree with the reasons for terminating your lease. Visit www.lawhelpmn.org to see if you qualify for free or low-cost legal assistance. In addition, your landlord may not increase the amount of rent stated on your lease more than once annually. The attached Lease Rider should already be signed by your landlord. You and all members of your household age 18 or older must also sign the Lease Rider in order to make it part of your lease. The Lease Rider needs to be signed each time you sign a new lease. If at any time additional adult household members enter the unit or a child who lives in that unit turns 18, they should add their signature to the existing Lease Rider with the current date. Your landlord also has a legal obligation to comply with the statutory requirements found in Section 601 of the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013 (VAWA). Under VAWA, you may not be denied admission, denied assistance, terminated from participation, or evicted on the basis that you are or have been a victim of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault or stalking, if you otherwise qualify for admission, assistance, participation or occupancy. You should have received the following when you were approved for occupancy or at some time during your occupancy: •HUD Form 5380 – Notice of Occupancy Rights under the Violence Against Women Act; and •HUD Form 5382 – Certification of Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, or Stalking, and Alternate Documentation. The landlord must also include these documents with any notice of eviction, lease non-renewal or termination of tenancy. You may also have signed a VAWA Lease Addendum. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact your resident manager, , or your landlord at (phone and email). Sincerely , Property Representative Name (print and sign) Date AHP 02/2020 Affordable Housing Program LEASE RIDER (attach to resident lease) Property Name: Building/Unit #: Head of Household Name: The Lease dated is hereby amended by adding the following provisions: 1. Owner/Landlord may not evict or terminate the tenancy (including refusing to renew this Lease) except for good cause. Good cause means (a) serious or repeated violation(s) of the material terms and conditions of the Lease. Any eviction, lease non-renewal or termination of tenancy notice must be in writing and must state the specific violation(s). The notice must comply with all requirements of Minnesota law and other applicable programs. 2. Owner/Landlord may not increase the lease rent more than once annually, regardless of the term of the Lease. To the extent that any terms contained in the Lease or any other agreement between the owner and the tenant contradict the terms of this Lease Rider, the provisions of this Lease Rider shall control. By signing below, I indicate my consent to this Lease Rider: Property Representative Name (print) (signature) Date ************************************************************************************* By signing below, I indicate my consent to this Lease Rider. I/we have been given a copy of this Lease Rider. Resident Name (print) (signature) Date Resident Name (print) (signature) Date Resident Name (print) (signature) Date Resident Name (print) (signature) Date AHP 02/2020 AHP 02/2020 Self-Certification of Household Annual Income For use by eligible Affordable Housing Program (only to be used in-between the 3rd year requirement of a full certification) Property Name: __________________ Unit Number: ______________ Recertification Date: _____________ 1. Enter all household member’s names, relationship to the head of household and student status below: Last Name First Name Relationship to Head of Household Has This Person Been a Student During the Past Year and/or Will This Person Be a Student in the Upcoming Year? 2. Enter all household members’ gross annual income (income before taxes). Types of income include but are not limited employment wages, military pay, public assistance, Social Security/SSI benefits, Pension, VA benefits, child support, regular gifts, unemployment, and some types of financial aid. Household Member’s Name Source of Income Gross Annual Income Total Gross Annual Income from Column: $ AHP 02/2020 3. Types of income from assets include but are not limited to interest and dividends earned from checking accounts, savings accounts, retirement accounts, certificates of deposit, money market, 401Ks and real estate. Total Cash Value: (total of Current Cash Value of Asset Colum) Total Actual Income from Assets: (total of Actual Income from Assets Column) $ $ Total Annual Income ANNUAL (GROSS) INCOME (TOTAL OF ALL HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS): $_______________________ I/we hereby affirm that the foregoing information is true and complete to the best of my/our knowledge and authorize the Owner/Manager to make inquires to verify the statements herein. I/we further understand that any intentional misrepresentation in this self-certification might result in a default in the rental agreement and/or eviction of the household. If any of the aforementioned changes, I/we agree to notify the Owner/Manager immediately. All household members age 18 or older must sign and date below: Signature: ______________________________________________ Date: _________________________________ Signature: ______________________________________________ Date: _________________________________ Signature: ______________________________________________ Date: _________________________________ Signature: ______________________________________________ Date: _________________________________ Household Member’s Name Type of Asset & Source Current Cash Value of Asset Actual Income From Assets 11/2019 Property Address: ____________________ Affordable Housing Program (AHP) STUDENT STATUS SELF-CERTIFICATION FIRST NAME: TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT / RESIDENT: A.Are you student at an institution of higher education?_____ Yes _____ No “Institution of higher education” includes post-secondary vocational institutions, “proprietary institutions of higher education” which prepare students for “gainful employment in a recognized occupation,” and accredited post-secondary colleges and universities. If you are not sure, please mark “yes” and we will verify the status of your institution. If you have answered no, please skip the following questions in (B) and sign below in (C). B.If you answered yes, please complete the following questions and sign below in (C): Yes No 1. Are you a full-time student?_____ ____ 2. Are you disabled?_____ ____ If yes, were you receiving Section 8 assistance as of November 30, 2005? _____ ____ 3. Are you at least 24 years of age? _____ ____ If no, please list birth date:________________ 4. Are you a veteran of the United States military?_____ ____ 5. Are you married?_____ ____ 6. Do you have a dependent other than a spouse (e.g. dependent child) _____ ____ 7. Will you be living with your parents?_____ ____ If no: a. Are your parents receiving or eligible to receive Section 8?_____ ____ b. Are you claimed as a dependent on your parent’s tax return? _____ ____ c. Have you maintained a household separate from your parents or guardians for at least 1 year?_____ ____ 8. Are you a graduate or professional student?_____ ____ 9. Were you an orphan or a ward of the court through the age of 18?_____ ____ 10. Are you classified as a Vulnerable Youth?_____ ____ 11. Are you a student for whom a financial aid administrator makes a documented determination of independence by reason of other unusual circumstances?_____ ____ C. ________________________________ __________________________________ Signature Print Name ________________________________ Date LAST NAME: AHP 02/2020 UNDER $50,000 ASSET CERTIFICATION for use with HRA's Affordable Housing Program Only For households whose combined net assets do not exceed $50,000. Complete only one form per household; include assets of children. Household Name: Unit No. Development Name: City: Complete all that apply for 1 through 4: 1.My/our assets include (enter n/a in (A) if you do not own the respective asset): (A) Cash Value* (B) Int. Rate (A*B) Annual Income Source (A) Cash Value* (B) Int. Rate (A*B) Annual Income Source $ $ Savings Account(s) $ $ Checking Account(s) $ $ Include online accounts such as GoFundMe, Fundly, etc. Cash on Hand $ $ Cash cards used to receive government benefits or other income $ $ Certificates of Deposit $ $ Money market funds $ $ Stocks $ $ Bonds $ $ IRA Account(s) $ $ 401K Account(s) $ $ Keogh Account(s) $ $ Trust Funds $ $ Equity in real estate $ $ Land Contracts $ $ Lump Sum Receipts $ $ Capital investments $ $ Life Insurance Policies (excluding Term) $ $ Other Retirement/Pension Funds not named above: $ $ Personal property held as an investment** : $ $ Other (list): PLEASE NOTE: Certain funds (e.g., Retirement, Pension, Trust) may or may not be (fully) accessible to you. Include only those amounts which are. *Cash value is defined as market value minus the cost of converting the asset to cash, such as broker's fees, settlement costs, outstanding loans, early withdrawal penalties, etc. **Personal property held as an investment may include, but is not limited to, gem or coin collections, art, antique cars, etc. Do not include necessary personal property such as, but not necessarily limited to, household furniture, daily-use autos, clothing, assets of an active business, or special equipment for use by the disabled. 2.Within the past two (2) years, I/we have sold or given away assets (including cash, real estate, etc.) for more than $1,000 below fair market value (FMV). Those amounts equal a total of: $ (enter the difference between FMV and the amount you received). 3.I/we have not sold or given away assets (including cash, real estate, etc.) for less than fair market value during the past two (2) years. 4.I/we do not have any assets at this time (do not check this box if you have entered any numbers in section 1, above). The net family assets (as defined in 24 CFR 813.102) above do not exceed $50,000 and the annual income from the net family assets is $ (enter the total of all (A*B) Annual Income in section 1 above). This amount is included in total gross annual income. Under penalty of perjury, I/we certify that the information presented in this certification is true and accurate to the best of my/our knowledge. The undersigned further understand(s) that providing false representations herein constitutes an act of fraud. False, misleading or incomplete information may result in the termination of a lease agreement. Applicant/Tenant Under $50,000 Asset Certification Date Applicant/Tenant Date K-1 4822-3850-8796\5 Exhibit K Form of Affordable Housing Restrictive Covenant DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS (Affordable Housing) THIS DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS (this “Declaration”) is made as of the _____ day of ______________, 20___, by Eden Avenue Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Declarant”). Recitals A. Declarant is the owner of certain real property situated in the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, located at 4917 Eden Avenue and legally described in the attached Exhibit A (the “Property”). B. Declarant; the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”); and the City of Edina Minnesota, a Minnesota statutory city (the “City”) are parties to that certain Redevelopment Agreement dated November 3, 2021 (as the same may be amended, modified, and/or supplemented from time to time, the “Redevelopment Agreement”). C. The Redevelopment Agreement provides for the redevelopment of the Property by Declarant with the cooperation and assistance of the Authority and the City and provides for the expenditure of certain public funds to assist in such redevelopment of the Property and construction of certain improvements thereon, including [196] rental housing units (the “Project”). D. The City, by Resolution No. 21-[_________], dated November 3, 2021, approved Declarant’s final rezoning, planned unit development ordinance, and final development plan for the Project. E. Pursuant to the Redevelopment Agreement, Declarant has agreed to impose certain restrictive covenants upon the Property to ensure that [20] [Prior to execution insert final number of Affordable Units per the Redevelopment Contract, to be a 10% of the residential units within the Minimum Improvements, but in no event fewer than 20 units] of the housing units within the Project will remain affordable to certain low-income persons and households (“Affordable Units”). F. Declarant, under this Declaration, intends, declares, and covenants that the restrictive covenants set forth herein governing the use, occupancy, and transfer of the Project shall be and are covenants running with the Property for the Term stated herein and binding upon all subsequent owners of the Property for such Term, and are not merely personal covenants of Declarant. NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant makes the following Declaration, hereby specifying that said Declaration shall constitute covenants to run with the land and shall be binding on all parties in interest and their respective successors and assigns: 1. Recitals; Definitions. The Recitals are true and correct statements of fact and are incorporated into this Declaration by this reference, including the definitions set forth therein. Each K-2 4822-3850-8796\5 capitalized term used herein and the Recitals, unless otherwise defined, shall have the respective meaning ascribed to such term in the Redevelopment Agreement. 2. Term. This Declaration, and the covenants and restrictions contained herein, shall continue in full force and effect for a period commencing on the date hereof and ending on the 21-year anniversary of the date that all the Affordable Units are first occupied by Qualifying Tenants (the “Term”); provided, however, Declarant’s obligations hereunder with respect to reporting, City auditing, and compliance with the terms of Affordable Unit leases, and the City’s enforcement remedies with respect to the same, shall survive until the expiration of the last of the leases with a Qualifying Tenant for an Affordable Unit. Without the execution or recording of any additional documents, this Declaration shall automatically cease to be of any force or effect upon the expiration of the Term. Declarant’s obligation to operate the Project subject to this Declaration for the Term is independent of the existence and continuance of any tax increment financing and/or other public assistance contemplated or given by the Authority or the City to Declarant under the Redevelopment Agreement, or otherwise (“Public Assistance”). The provisions of this Declaration are intended to survive the termination or extinguishment of any Public Assistance, any mortgage securing the same, and any other security instruments placed of record in connection with the Public Assistance and to survive the termination of any subsequent financing or security instruments placed of record by other lenders. 3. Occupancy Requirements and Restrictions. (a) Qualifying Tenants. During the Term, the Affordable Units shall be leased and occupied (or held vacant and available for occupancy) only by Qualifying Tenants. “Qualifying Tenants” means individuals or households who, at initial occupancy, have a combined gross annual income which does not exceed 50% of the area median income (including adjustments for family size), as determined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (“HUD”) Area Median Income for the Minneapolis-Saint Paul-Bloomington Metropolitan Statistical Area (“AMI”). (b) Rental Rates. The Affordable Units shall bear annual rents not greater than the rental rate limits for such Qualifying Tenants (adjusted for bedroom count, and including utilities and mandatory fees, such as parking) as determined and announced from time to time by HUD and as published annually by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (or any successor agency(ies) administrating government affordable housing programs), and if such agency ceases to publish and update such rates during the Term, such annual rents for the Affordable Units shall not be not greater than 30% of 50% of AMI. (c) Certification of Tenant Eligibility. No tenant household shall be approved by Declarant for initial occupancy of an Affordable Unit unless and until Declarant has determined (through verification of income, assets, expenses, and deductions) whether such tenant household is a Qualifying Tenant. Each person who is intended to be a Qualifying Tenant will be required at the commencement of the initial lease of an Affordable Unit to sign and deliver to Declarant a “Certification of Tenant Eligibility” substantially in the form attached as Exhibit B, or in any other form as may be approved in writing by the Executive Director of the Authority or the City Manager of the City (the “Eligibility Certification”), in which the prospective tenant certifies as to qualifying as a Qualifying Tenant. Eligibility Certifications may be obtained no more than 120 days before a Qualifying Tenant occupies an Affordable Unit. In addition, the person will be required to provide whatever other information, documents, or certifications are deemed reasonably necessary by the Authority or the City to substantiate the Eligibility Certification. Eligibility Certifications will be maintained on file by Declarant with respect to each Qualifying Tenant who resides or resided in an Affordable Unit for a period of 10 years following the end of the Term. Declarant must re- K-3 4822-3850-8796\5 examine and verify the income of each tenant household living in an Affordable Unit annually unless, during such year, all of the Affordable Units are occupied by Qualifying Tenants during the calendar year. In addition, no re-certification shall be required if a Qualifying Tenant moves to a different Affordable Unit. (d) Leases. The Affordable Units shall be rented pursuant to a written lease, and the term of each such lease shall be least 12 months, except that during the final year of the Term, new leases for the Affordable Units may be for a term of no less than six months, and such newly leased Affordable Units shall be subject to the terms and conditions of this Declaration until the expiration of such new leases. In addition, each lease utilized by Declarant in renting any Affordable Unit to any person who is intended to be a Qualifying Tenant shall: (i) not require a security deposit in excess of the amount of one month of rent in connection with any Affordable Unit; (ii) provide that rental rates charged to any Qualifying Tenant of an Affordable Unit cannot be increased more than once in any 12-month period; (iii) provide for termination of the lease and consent by the person to eviction for failure to qualify as a Qualifying Tenant as a result of any material misrepresentation made by the person with respect to the Eligibility Certification; (iv) include a clause wherein each individual tenant or tenant certifies the accuracy of the statements made in its application and Eligibility Certification; and (v) include a clause wherein each individual tenant or tenant certifies that the family income at the time the lease is executed will be deemed substantial and material obligation of the tenant’s tenancy; that the tenant will comply promptly with all requests for income and other information relevant to determining low or moderate income status from Declarant, the Authority, or the City, and that the tenant’s failure or refusal to comply with a request for information with respect thereto will be deemed a violation of a substantial obligation of the tenant’s tenancy of its Affordable Unit. (e) Affordable Unit Mix. The Affordable Units shall consist of [four (4)] studio units (each of which shall be no smaller than 500 square feet in size), [ten (10)] one-bedroom units (each of which shall be no smaller than 700 square feet in size), and [six (6)] two-bedroom units (each of which shall be no smaller than 1,000 square feet in size), and each as specifically identified in the table below [Affordable Units will be fixed; prior to execution, insert final Affordable Units below]. The two-bedroom units must be leased to Qualified Tenants consisting of households of at least two members. Any change in the foregoing distribution and below identification of Affordable Units shall require the prior written approval of the Executive Director of the Authority and City Manager of the City, which such consent will not be unreasonably conditioned, delayed or withheld. Affordable Units Type of Unit Unit No. Floor Square Feet 1. Studio 2. Studio 3. Studio K-4 4822-3850-8796\5 4. Studio 5. 1-bedroom 6. 1-bedroom 7. 1-bedroom 8. 1-bedroom 9. 1-bedroom 10. 1-bedroom 11. 2-bedroom 12. 2-bedroom 13. 2-bedroom 14. 2-bedroom 15. 2-bedroom 16. 2-bedroom 17. 2-bedroom 18. 2-bedroom 19. 2-bedroom 20. 2-bedroom 4. Enforcement of Covenants and Restrictions. (a) Annual Certification. Declarant shall prepare and submit to the Authority and the City, annually for approval on the basis of compliance with this Declaration, a certificate substantially in the form of the attached Exhibit C, executed by Declarant, (i) identifying the tenancies and the dates of occupancy (or vacancy) for all Qualifying Tenants, including the percentage of the dwelling units of the Project which were occupied by Qualifying Tenants (or held vacant and available for occupancy by Qualifying Tenants) at all times during the year preceding the date of the certificate; (ii) describing all transfers or other changes in ownership of the Project or any interest therein; and (iii) stating that all Affordable Units were rented or available for rental on a continuous basis during the year to Qualifying Tenants and that Declarant was not otherwise in default under this Declaration during the year. The initial deadline for submission of such certification is three months following the date that all the Affordable Units are first occupied by Qualifying Tenants and thereafter an annual deadline for submission of January 31. (b) Books and Records. Declarant shall permit, during normal business hours and upon reasonable notice, any duly authorized representative of the Authority or City, to inspect any books and records of Declarant regarding the Project with respect to the incomes of tenant households of Affordable Units and the rents charged for Affordable Units to ensure compliance with the requirements of this Declaration. At the City’s or Authority’s request, Declarant will submit any other information, documents or certifications that Declarant, in its reasonable discretion, deems necessary to substantiate Declarant’s compliance with the requirements of this Declaration. (c) Delegation; Third-Party Monitoring. Each of the Authority and the City may, in their reasonable discretion, delegate their obligations hereunder and responsibilities for monitoring and enforcement of this Declaration to a separate subdivision of the City and/or one or more designated contractors, subcontractors, or agents. Declarant shall, upon annual invoicing, reimburse the Authority and the City for third-party expenses related to monitoring of Declarant’s compliance with this Declaration, which such costs shall initially not exceed $2,700 per year (plus any additional costs necessitated by re-inspections for noncompliance with this Declaration) and thereafter be subject to reasonable adjustment from time to time. K-5 4822-3850-8796\5 (d) City Affordable Housing Policy. The Project and the Affordable Units shall be subject to the terms and condition of the City’s Inclusionary Housing Policy Program, as may be amended from time to time. (e) Notice of Non-Compliance. Declarant shall immediately notify the Authority and the City if at any time during the term of this Declaration the dwelling units in the Project are not occupied or available for occupancy as required by the terms of this Declaration. 5. Additional Covenants, Representations, and Warranties of Declarant. (a) Legal Compliance. Declarant shall construction and maintain the Affordable Units and the Project in compliance with all requirements of the Redevelopment Agreement (including, without limitation, the level of finishes and amenities described in the Redevelopment Agreement), the City Approvals, any requirements of any lender whose loan is secured by a mortgage to which Declarant is a party or by which it or the Project is bound, and all applicable ordinances, building and use restrictions, code-required building permits, and any requirements with respect to licenses, permits, and agreements necessary for the lawful use and operation of the Project. (b) No Violation. The execution and performance of this Declaration by Declarant (i) will not violate or, as applicable, have not violated any provision of law, rule or regulation, or any order of any court or other agency or governmental body, and (ii) will not violate or, as applicable, have not violated any provision of any indenture, agreement, mortgage, mortgage note, or other instrument to which Declarant is a party or by which it or the Project is bound, and (iii) will not result in the creation or imposition of any prohibited encumbrance of any nature. (c) Section 8 Housing. Declarant shall accept tenants who are recipients of federal certificates for rent subsidies pursuant to the existing program under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, codified as 42 U.S.C. Sections 1401 et seq., or its successor. Declarant shall not adopt any policies specifically excluding rental to tenants holding Section 8 certificate/voucher holders solely because of the status of the prospective tenant as such a holder. (d) Underserved Populations. Declarant shall affirmatively market the Affordable Units to one or more traditionally underserved populations as affordable at the rates required hereunder. (e) Consents and Subordination. Declarant shall obtain the consent to this Declaration of any prior recorded lien-holder for the Property and shall cause such liens to be subordinated to this Declaration. Declarant has not and will not execute any other agreement with provisions contradictory to, or in opposition to, the provisions hereof and that, in any event, the requirements of this Declaration are paramount and controlling as to the rights and obligations set forth herein and supersede any other document’s provisions in conflict herewith. (f) Transfer Restrictions. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Redevelopment Agreement and the City Approvals, Declarant may sell, transfer or exchange the Project, the Property or any portion thereof, but Declarant shall notify the Authority and the City in writing at least 60 days prior to such sale, transfer or exchange, and use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain the acknowledgment of any buyer or successor or other person acquiring the Project or any interest therein that such acquisition is subject to the covenants and restrictions of this Declaration (and to the requirements of the Redevelopment Agreement incorporated herein). Failure by Declarant to obtain such acknowledgment shall not be deemed to impair the covenants and restrictions of this Declaration. K-6 4822-3850-8796\5 (g) Alterations; Use. Declarant shall not demolish any part of the Project or substantially subtract from any real or personal property of the Project or permit the use of any residential unit for any purpose other than rental housing during the Term of this Declaration unless required by law. Qualifying Tenants shall have the same access to the Project amenities as residents of the market-rate units. (h) Condemnation, Damage, or Destruction. In the event that title to and possession of the Project or any material part thereof shall be taken in condemnation or by the exercise of the power of eminent domain by any governmental body or other person (except the Authority or the City) or the Project is damaged or destroyed, Declarant shall, with reasonable promptness after such taking, notify the Authority as to the nature and extent of such damage or taking, as applicable. Upon receipt of any condemnation award or insurance proceeds Declarant shall elect to either: (a) use the entire condemnation award or insurance proceeds to reconstruct the Project (or, in the event only a part of the Project has been taken or damaged, then to reconstruct such part) upon the remaining Property to the extent necessary to maintain and continue operations of Project for its intended purpose; or (b) in the event that the condemnation affects or taking or damage or destruction affects the Property but not the Project improvements thereon, retain, for the account of Declarant, all of the condemnation award or insurance proceeds. 6. Remedies; Enforceability. In the event of a violation or attempted violation of any of the covenants, conditions or restrictions herein contained, the City or the Authority may institute and prosecute any proceeding at law or in equity to abate, prevent or enjoin any such violation, or enforce specific performance by Declarant of the covenants, obligations, conditions and/or restrictions set forth herein, or to recover monetary damages caused by such violation or attempted violation. Declarant specifically acknowledges that the City and the Authority cannot be adequately compensated by monetary damages in the event of any default hereunder. Unless terminated as provided herein, the provisions hereof are imposed upon and made applicable to the Project, and shall be enforceable against Declarant, each purchaser, grantee, owner or tenant of the Project and the respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns of each. No delay in enforcing the provisions of said covenants, conditions and restrictions as to any breach or violation shall impair, damage or waive the right to enforce the same or to obtain relief against or recover for the continuation or repetition of such breach or violation or any similar breach or violation thereof at any later time or times. In addition to any remedy set forth herein for failure to comply with the restrictions set forth in this Declaration, any such failure shall be a Default under the Redevelopment Agreement and the City or the Authority may exercise any remedy available to it under the Redevelopment Agreement if such Default becomes an Event of Default. 7. Indemnification. Declarant hereby indemnifies, and agrees to defend and hold harmless, the Authority, the City, and their respective officers, officials, employees, and agents, from and against all liabilities, losses, damages, costs, expenses (including attorneys’ fees and expenses), causes of action, suits, allegations, claims, demands, and judgments of any nature arising from the consequences of a legal or administrative proceeding or action brought against them, or any of them, on account of any failure by Declarant to comply with the terms of this Declaration, or on account of any representation or warranty of Declarant contained herein being untrue. 8. Covenants Running With the Land. Declarant intends, declares and covenants, on behalf of itself and all future owners and operators of the Property and the Project during the Term, that this Declaration and the covenants and restrictions set forth in this Declaration regulating and restricting the use, occupancy and transfer of the Property and the Project (a) shall be and are covenants running with the Property and the Project, encumbering the Property and the Project for the Term, binding upon Declarant’s successors in title and all subsequent owners and operators of the Property and the Project; (b) are not merely personal covenants of Declarant; and (c) shall bind Declarant (and the benefits shall inure to the K-7 4822-3850-8796\5 Authority and the City) and its respective successors and assigns during the Term. Declarant hereby agrees that any and all requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota to be satisfied in order for the provisions of this Declaration to constitute deed restrictions and covenants running with the land shall be deemed to be satisfied in full and that any requirements of privileges of estate are intended to be satisfied, or in the alternate, that an equitable servitude has been created to insure that these restrictions run with the land. For the Term, each and every contract, deed or other instrument hereafter executed conveying the Property and the Project or portion thereof shall expressly provide that such conveyance is subject to this Declaration; provided, however, that the covenants contained herein shall survive and be effective regardless of whether such contract, deed or other instrument hereafter executed conveying the Property and the Project or portion thereof provides that such conveyance is subject to this Declaration. 9. Waiver. The waiver by the Authority of any breach or default of any provisions anywhere contained in this Declaration shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach or default thereof. No provision of this Declaration shall be deemed to have been waived by any party hereto or party benefited hereby unless such waiver is in writing and signed by the party charged with any such waiver. 10. Notices. Any notice, approval, consent, payment, demand, communication, authorization, delegation, recommendation, agreement, offer, report, statement, certification or disclosure required or permitted to be given or made under this Declaration, whether or not expressly so stated, shall not be effective unless and until given or made in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given or made as of the following date: (a) if delivered personally by courier or otherwise, then as of the date delivered or if delivery is refused, then as of the date presented; or (b) if sent or mailed by certified U.S. mail, return receipt requested, or by Federal Express, Express Mail or other mail or overnight courier service, then as of the date received. All such communications shall be addressed as follows (which address(es) for a party may be changed by that party from time to time by notice to the other parties). No such communications to a party shall be effective unless and until deemed received at all address(es) for such party: Declarant at: c/o Reuter Walton Development, LLC Attn: Nicholas Walton 4450 Excelsior Boulevard, Suite 400 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 with a copy to: The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company Attention: Real Estate Investment Department 720 East Wisconsin Avenue Milwaukee, WI 53202 The Authority at: Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota Attention: Executive Director 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 with a copy to: Dorsey & Whitney LLP Attention: Jay R. Lindgren 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 The City at: City of Edina Attention: City Manager 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 K-8 4822-3850-8796\5 with a copy to: Dorsey & Whitney LLP Attention: Jay R. Lindgren 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address with respect to any such party as that party may, from time to time, designate in writing and forward to the other, as provided in this Section. 11. Joinder; Permitted Encumbrance. Except for the mortgagee consent attached hereto, this Declaration does not require the joinder or approval of any other person and each of the parties respectfully has the full, unrestricted and exclusive legal right and power to enter into this Declaration for the term and upon the provisions herein recited and for the use and purposes hereinabove set forth. This Declaration shall constitute a permitted encumbrance under any loan agreement heretofore or hereafter entered into between Owner and any construction lender or permanent lender. 12. Amendment. The provisions of this Declaration shall not be amended, terminated or deleted during the Term hereof, except by an instrument in writing duly executed by the Authority, the City, and Declarant, their respective successors and assigns. 13. Attorneys’ Fees. In case any action at law or in equity, including an action for declaratory relief, is brought against Declarant to enforce the provisions of this Declaration, Declarant agrees to pay the reasonable attorneys’ fees and other reasonable expenses paid or incurred by the City and/or the Authority in connection with the action. 14. Governing Law. This Declaration is governed by the laws of the state of Minnesota and, where applicable, the laws of the United States of America. 15. Severability. If any provisions hereof shall be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining portions shall not in any way be affected or impaired. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature page follows] K-9 [Signature Page to Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions] 4822-3850-8796\5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarant has caused this Declaration to be executed as of the date first written above EDEN AVENUE GROUP, LLC By: Eden Avenue Partners, LLC, its Manager By: _________________________________________ Name: Nicholas Walton Its: Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of ________________, 2021, by Nicholas Walton, the Manager of Eden Avenue Partners, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, the Manager of Eden Avenue Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Dorsey & Whitney LLP 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 K-10 [Exhibit A to Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions] 4822-3850-8796\5 Exhibit A Legal Description of the Property Tracts A and C, Registered Land Survey No. 1501, Hennepin County, Minnesota K-11 [Exhibit B to Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions] 4822-3850-8796\5 Exhibit B Form of Certification of Tenant Eligibility K-12 [Exhibit B to Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions] 4822-3850-8796\5 K-13 [Exhibit C to Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions] 4822-3850-8796\5 Exhibit C Form of Certificate of Continuing Program Compliance Certificate of Continuing Program Compliance Date: ___________________ The following information with respect to the Project located at 4917 Eden Avenue, Edina, Minnesota (the “Project”), is being provided by Eden Avenue Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Declarant”) to the City of Edina, Minnesota, a Minnesota statutory city (the “City”) and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”), pursuant to that certain Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions (Affordable Housing) dated ________________ ___, 2021 (the “Declaration”), with respect to the Project: (A) The total number of Affordable Units which are available for occupancy is [20]. The total number of these units occupied is _________________. (B) The following Affordable Units (identified by unit number) are currently occupied by “Qualifying Tenants,” as the term is defined in the Declaration (for a total of [20] units): Unit Number Name of Tenant Number of Persons Residing in the Unit Number of Bedrooms Total Adjusted Gross Income Date of Initial Occupancy Rent 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 K-14 [Exhibit C to Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions] 4822-3850-8796\5 (C) Declarant has obtained a “Certification of Tenant Eligibility,” in the form provided as Exhibit B to the Declaration, from each Tenant named in (B) above, and each such Certificate is being maintained by Declarant in its records with respect to the Project. Attached hereto is the most recent “Certification of Tenant Eligibility” for each Tenant named in (B) above who signed such a Certification since ______________, _____, the date on which the last “Certificate of Continuing Program Compliance” was filed with the Authority and the City by Declarant. (D) In renting the residential units in the Project, Declarant has not given preference to any particular group or class of persons (except for persons who qualify as Qualifying Tenants); and none of the units listed in (B) above have been rented for occupancy entirely by students, no one of which is entitled to file a joint return for federal income tax purposes. All of the residential units in the Project have been rented pursuant to a written lease, and the term of each lease is at least twelve (12) months. (E) The information provided in this “Certificate of Continuing Program Compliance” is accurate and complete, and no matters have come to the attention of Declarant which would indicate that any of the information provided herein, or in any “Certification of Tenant Eligibility” obtained from the Tenants named herein, is inaccurate or incomplete in any respect. (F) The Project is in continuing compliance with the Declaration. (G) Declarant certifies that as of the date hereof at least [20] of the residential dwelling units in the Project are occupied or held open for occupancy by Qualifying Tenants, as defined and provided in the Declaration. (H) The rental levels for each Qualifying Tenant comply with the maximum permitted under the Declaration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my signature, on behalf of Declarant, on ____________________, 20___. EDEN AVENUE GROUP, LLC By: Eden Avenue Partners, LLC, its Manager By: _________________________________________ Name: Nicholas Walton Its: Manager K-15 4822-3850-8796\5 CONSENT AND SUBORDINATION The undersigned, ___________________, a ___________________, holder of that certain [Mortgage] executed by Eden Avenue Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, dated ________________, 20___, filed ________________, 20____, as Document No. ___________, in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and filed ________________, 20____, as Document No. ___________, in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, in favor of ________________ (the “Mortgage”), hereby consents to the foregoing Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions (Affordable Housing) (the “Declaration”), and hereby subordinates the Mortgage and all of its right, title and interest in the Property to the Declaration. ___________________________________, a ___________________ By: _________________________________________ Printed Name: ________________________________ Title: ________________________________________ STATE OF ______________ ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ______________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of ____________, 20___, by ____________________, the _________________ of ___________________, a ___________________, on behalf of the ___________________. (Signature of Person Taking Acknowledgment) THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Dorsey & Whitney LLP 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 L-1 4820-3049-8044\4 Exhibit L Form of Right of First Purchase Option Agreement RIGHT OF FIRST PURCHASE OPTION AGREEMENT (4917 Eden Avenue) THIS RIGHT OF FIRST PURCHASE OPTION AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into this ___ day of ____________, 202__ (“Effective Date”), by and between the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”), and Eden Avenue Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Owner”). RECITALS: A. The City of Edina, Minnesota, a Minnesota statutory city (the “City”), the Authority, and Owner, as “Developer”, are parties to that certain Redevelopment Agreement dated November 3, 2021 (the “Redevelopment Agreement”). B. The Redevelopment Agreement provides for the redevelopment by Owner of certain real property legally described on the attached Exhibit A (the “Project Area”) and located within the Eden / Willson Tax Incremental Financing District, established by the Authority pursuant to Resolution No. 2021- 12 (as the same may be modified from time-to-time, the “TIF District”), in coordination with the Authority and with the cooperation and assistance of the City. C. The Redevelopment Agreement provides for the expenditure of certain public funds to assist in the redevelopment of the Project Area with certain “Minimum Improvements” consisting generally of a seven-story, mixed-use building, including, approximately 196 rental apartment units, an approximately 3,400 square-foot restaurant, 277 stalls of structured parking, and related site improvements. D. The Redevelopment Agreement requires that [20] of such residential units (the “Affordable Units”) will be leased at rates that are considered affordable to individuals or households earning less than 50% of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Area Median Income (“AMI”) for the Minneapolis-Saint Paul-Bloomington Metropolitan Statistical Area and that the Affordable Units be subject to that certain Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions (Affordable Housing) dated as of an even date herewith by Developer in favor of the City and Authority (the “Affordable Housing Declaration”). E. The Authority and Owner have agreed in the Redevelopment Agreement that Owner shall grant the Authority the first right to purchase one or more of the Affordable Units (the “Purchase Right”) in the event the Affordable Units are converted from rental units to for-sale units, as more particularly set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the others as follows: 1. Recitals; Definitions. The Recitals are true and correct statements of fact and are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference, including the definitions set forth therein. Each capitalized term used herein and the Recitals, unless otherwise defined, shall have the respective meaning ascribed to such term in the Redevelopment Agreement. L-2 4820-3049-8044\4 2. Right to Purchase. Upon and subject to the terms hereinafter set forth, Owner hereby grants to the Authority, and the Authority hereby accepts, an option to purchase (“Purchase Option”) one or more of the Affordable Units, together with an undivided interest in all common elements, all easements and rights benefiting or appurtenant to the Affordable Units (collectively, the “Property”) upon the occurrence of a For-Sale Conversion (as defined below). The Purchase Option shall terminate only upon the occurrence of any of the following: (a) the Authority issues a Rejection Notice or fails to timely issue an Election Notice, as set forth in Section 4 below; (b) the execution of a written termination by the then-fee title owner of the Property and the Authority; or (c) the date of termination of the TIF District (the “Term”). 3. For-Sale Conversion. In the event Owner elects to convert (a “For-Sale Conversion”) all or part of the apartment component of the Minimum Improvements, including the Affordable Units, from rental units into condominium units, cooperative units, or otherwise subdivide such units into separately transferable and taxable housing units (“Separate Units”), then Owner shall give the Authority prompt notice of Owner’s election to proceed with a For-Sale Conversion and the Owner shall give the Authority notice of the date (the “Conversion Date”) on which Owner causes the operative documents effectuating the For-Sale Conversion to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota and/or the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, as applicable (e.g., recording of the common interest community declaration and plat, registered land survey, etc.), which such notice shall be delivered to the Authority no later than two (2) business days after the Conversion Date. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, Owner shall not be required to include the individual Affordable Units in a For-Sale Conversion (such that each Affordable Unit is also converted into a Separate Unit) and, instead, Owner may cause all the Affordable Units to be collectively subdivided into a single “Separate Unit”, lot, or tract as part of a subdivision process that would otherwise be considered a For-Sale Conversion (the “Affordable Tract”), in which event, the Purchase Option shall not apply to the Affordable Tract and the Affordable Tract shall remain subject to the Affordable Housing Declaration in accordance with its terms. 4. Offer to Transfer of Affordable Units. If at any time following such Conversion, Owner desires to sell, convey, transfer or otherwise dispose of any interest in and to any of the Affordable Units (“Transfer”), then Owner shall provide written notice to the Authority that Owner desires to so Transfer such Affordable Units and shall offer to so Transfer the Affordable Units to the Authority upon the terms and conditions set forth herein (“Offer”). 5. Election Period. The Authority shall have 120 days after the date of its receipt of the Offer (the “Offer Date”) to notify Owner of the Authority’s desire, in its sole discretion, and subject to approval by the Authority’s board of commissioners, to purchase one or more of the Affordable Units and related Property subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement and the Offer (the “Election Period”). Prior to the expiration of the Election Period, the Authority shall notify Owner that the Authority either (a) elects to so purchase one or more of the Affordable Units (“Election Notice”) (which such Election Notice will specify which Affordable Units the Authority elects to purchase) or (b) waives it right to purchase one or more of the Affordable Units (“Rejection Notice”). In the event the Authority issues a Rejection Notice or fails to timely issue an Election Notice, then the Purchase Option shall be deemed terminated and of no further force or effect, and Owner shall be free to sell the Affordable Units on terms and conditions acceptable to Owner in its sole discretion. 6. Documents; Inspection. Within 10 days after the Offer Date, Owner shall either make available to the Authority copies of all documents, reports, studies, tests, drawings, surveys, agreements, contracts, and all other documentation relating to the Property in Owner’s possession or control or to which Owner has knowledge or access (“Property Documents”). During the Election Period (or until the Authority issues a Rejection Notice), the Authority may examine the Property Documents and Owner shall allow the Authority, and the Authority’s employees, agents, and contractors, access to the Property upon reasonable L-3 4820-3049-8044\4 notice from the Authority without charge and for the purpose of the Authority’s reasonable inspection, investigation and testing of the same. 7. Title Examination. Within 15 days after the Offer Date, Owner shall deliver to the Authority a current commitment (the “Commitment”) for an ALTA Form Owner’s Policy of Title Insurance insuring title to the Property in the amount of the Purchase Price issued by a reputable title company (the “Title Company”), legible copies of all documents cited, raised as exceptions or noted in the title commitment and Owner’s most recent survey of the Property (provided, the Authority may elect to obtain a new survey at its sole cost and expense) (collectively [including the new survey if so obtained], the “Title Evidence”). During the Election Period, the Authority may make written objections (“Objections”) to the Title Evidence. All matter shown by the Title Evidence and not objected to by the Authority shall be a “Permitted Encumbrance” hereunder. Owner shall not have any obligation to cure or attempt to cure any Objections which cannot be cured solely by the payment of money, however Owner shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cure the Objections. 8. Purchase Terms. The following provisions are applicable to the Purchase Option: (a) Purchase Price. The purchase price per each Affordable Unit (and related Property) (the “Purchase Price”) purchased by the Authority pursuant to the Purchase Option shall be the “Fair Market Value” of such Affordable Unit(s), which shall mean the fair market value of the Affordable Unit(s) that an independent third party would be willing to pay for the Affordable Unit(s) in an arm’s length transaction without any compulsion to proceed, which shall be determined as follows: if the parties are unable to agree on the purchase price within 30 days after the Offer Date, then the Authority and Owner shall each select a qualified MAI appraiser to determine the Fair Market Value for the Affordable Unit(s) within 10 days after said 30-day period. If Owner fails to give notice identifying an appraiser within the time provided, Owner has waived the right to identify an appraiser and the decision of the Authority’s appraiser controls. If two (2) appraisers are selected, they must within 15 days after the selection of the second agree to a third appraiser. If the two (2) appraisers fail to identify the third appraiser within such 15-day period, the either the Authority or Owner may petition the district court (or its equivalent) having jurisdiction over the Property for the appointment of the third appraiser. The three appraisers must each, within 30 days after the appointment of the third appraiser, simultaneously deliver to the Authority and Owner their expert opinions of the Fair Market Value in question. The Fair Market Value is the average of the three appraisals unless one appraisal is more than ten percent (10%) greater or lesser than the average of the other two (2) appraisals, in which case that appraisal is disregarded, and the average of the remaining appraisals is the Fair Market Value. Each party must pay the cost of the appraiser selected by it and one-half of the cost of the third appraiser. All appraisers must be disinterested and must have the designation, MAI, SRA or equivalent and must have not less than five years’ experience appraising real estate in the business market wherein the Property is located. The appraisers may, but need not, present formal written appraisals supporting their opinion but must, in any event, certify that the report was conducted in accordance with professional standards. The decision of this appraisal process is binding upon the parties and must not be subject to appeal to a court or other body except based upon fraud. The Fair Market Value shall specifically take into account, without limitation, the encumbrance of the Affordable Units by the Affordable Housing Declaration, the reduced rents required under the Affordable Housing Declaration, and the remaining term of the Affordable Housing Declaration at the time Fair Market Value is being determined. (b) Closing. The closing of the purchase and sale pursuant to the Purchase Option (the “Closing”) shall occur no later than 30 days after the Authority issues its Election Notice (the L-4 4820-3049-8044\4 “Closing Date”). Owner agrees to deliver possession of the Property to the Authority on the Closing Date. (c) Owner’s Closing Deliveries. On the Closing Date, Owner shall execute and deliver to the Authority the following, all in form and content reasonably satisfactory to the Authority: (i) a limited warranty deed (the “Deed”) conveying the applicable Property specified in the Election Notice to the Authority subject only to the Permitted Encumbrances; (ii) a non-foreign affidavit, properly executed, containing such information as is required by Internal Revenue Code Section 1445(b)(2) and its regulations; and (iii) such affidavits, certificates or other documents as may be reasonably required by Title Company in order to record the Deed and issue an ALTA Form Owner’s Policy of Title Insurance insuring title to the Property in the amount of the Purchase Price subject only to the Permitted Encumbrances (the “Title Policy”). (d) The Authority’s Closing Deliveries. On the Closing Date, the Authority will execute and/or deliver to Owner the following: (i) Purchase Price; and (ii) such affidavits, certificates or other documents as may be reasonably required by Title Company in order to record the Deed and issue the Title Policy. (e) Prorations. If the Authority issues its Election Notice, Owner and the Authority agree to the following prorations and allocation of costs regarding this Agreement and Property purchased by the Authority: (i) Title Charges and Closing Fee. Owner will pay all costs for the Commitment. The Authority will pay all title insurance premiums required for the issuance of the Title Policy, including the cost of all additional endorsements thereto. Owner and the Authority will each pay one-half of any closing fee or charge imposed by Title Company. (ii) Taxes. Owner shall pay all state deed tax or transfer tax or fee payable in connection with this transaction. Special assessments, if any, shall be paid in full by Owner on or before the Closing Date. Real estate taxes shall be prorated as of the Closing Date. Accordingly, Owner shall pay all real estate taxes due and payable up to the Closing Date and the Authority shall pay all real estate taxes due and payable on and after the Closing Date. (iii) Other Income and Expenses. All income (including, without limitation, rents) and other expenses shall be prorated and adjusted as of the Closing Date. (iv) Attorney’s Fees. Each of the parties will pay its own attorney’s fees. (f) Warranties and Representations by Owner. Owner warrants and represents to the Authority as follows: (i) Owner has the requisite power and authority (including all necessary approvals and authorizations) to enter into and perform this Agreement and those closing documents to be signed by it; such documents have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of Owner and have been or will be duly executed and delivered; such execution, delivery and performance by Owner of such documents does not and will not conflict with or result in a violation of any judgment, order, or decree of any court or arbiter to which Owner is a party, or any law, statute, rule or regulation by which Owner is bound; L-5 4820-3049-8044\4 such documents are and will be valid and binding obligations of Owner, and are and will be enforceable in accordance with their terms. (ii) As of the Closing Date, the Property is not subject to any leases or possessory rights of any party other than Owner and residential tenants. (g) As-Is. Except as herein expressly stated, the Authority is purchasing the Property (or the applicable part thereof) based upon its own investigation and inquiry and is not relying on any warranty or representation of Owner or any other person and is agreeing to accept and purchase the Property “as is, where is” subject to the conditions of examination herein set forth and the express warranties and representations herein contained. (h) Condemnation; Casualty. If eminent domain proceedings are commenced against all or a part of the Property, or if all or a substantial part of the property is damaged by fire or other casualty, on or before the Closing Date, Owner shall immediately give written notice to the Authority, and the Authority shall have the right to terminate any exercised Purchase Option by giving written notice of such termination to Owner within 30 days after Owner’s notice of such proceedings is given to the Authority. If the Authority shall fail to give such notice, then the parties shall proceed to Closing, and Owner shall assign to the Authority all rights to appear in and receive any award from such proceedings. (i) Broker’s Commission. Owner and the Authority warrant and represent to each other that they have dealt with no brokers, finders or the like in connection with this transaction, and agree to indemnify and hold each other harmless from all claims, damages, costs or expenses of or for any fees or commissions owing to any brokers, finders or the like resulting from their actions or agreements regarding the execution or performance of this Agreement, and will pay all costs of defending any action or lawsuit brought to recover any such fees or commissions incurred by the other party, including reasonable attorneys’ fees. (j) Remedies. If the Authority defaults in performance of its obligations under this Agreement, Owner shall have the right to terminate this Agreement in the manner provided by Minn. Stat. Sec. 559.21 (inclusive of a minimum 30-day notice and right to cure) as its sole and exclusive remedy. If Owner defaults in performance of its obligations under this Agreement, the Authority will provide written notice thereof to Owner. If Owner fails to cure such default within 30 days after such notice, the Authority shall have the right, in addition to all other rights under applicable law, including the right to seek and obtain specific performance of this this Agreement. 9. Notices. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, a notice, demand or other communication under this Agreement by any party to any other shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is (a) dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, (b) sent by recognized overnight courier (such as Federal Express), or (c) delivered personally, as follows: In the case of Owner: At the address of record for real property tax assessment notices with respect to the applicable Parcel, or at such other address as either party shall have specified by written notice delivered in accordance with this section. with a copy to (so long The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company as Eden Avenue Group, Attention: Real Estate Investment Department LLC is the Owner): 720 East Wisconsin Avenue Milwaukee, WI 53202 L-6 4820-3049-8044\4 In the case of the Authority: Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota Attention: Executive Director 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 with a copy to: Dorsey & Whitney LLP Attn: Jay Lindgren 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address with respect to any such party as that party may, from time to time, designate in writing and forward to the other, as provided in this Section. 10. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement and the purchase options set forth herein shall inure to the benefit of the Authority and its successors and assigns and be binding upon Owner and the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of Owner, and upon any individual or entity acquiring the Property or any portion thereof, or any interest therein, whether by operation of law or otherwise. 11. Waiver. The waiver by any party hereto of any breach or default of any provisions anywhere contained in this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach or default thereof. No provision of this Agreement shall be deemed to have been waived by any party hereto unless such waiver is in writing and signed by the party charged with any such waiver. 12. Joinder; Permitted Encumbrance. Except for the mortgagee consent attached hereto, this Agreement does not require the joinder or approval of any other person and each of the parties respectfully has the full, unrestricted and exclusive legal right and power to enter into this Agreement for the term and upon the provisions herein recited and for the use and purposes hereinabove set forth. This Agreement shall constitute a permitted encumbrance under any loan agreement heretofore or hereafter entered into between Owner and any construction lender or permanent lender. 13. Amendments. Except as otherwise herein provided, and not otherwise, no subsequent alteration, amendment, change, waiver, discharge, termination, deletion, or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon either party unless in writing and signed by both parties. 14. Attorneys’ Fees. In case any action at law or in equity, including an action for declaratory relief, is brought against Owner to enforce the provisions of this Agreement, Owner agrees to pay the reasonable attorneys’ fees and other reasonable expenses paid or incurred by the Authority in connection with the action. 15. Governing Law. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the state of Minnesota and, where applicable, the laws of the United States of America. 16. Severability. If any provisions hereof shall be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining portions shall not in any way be affected or impaired. 17. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. L-7 4820-3049-8044\4 [Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature pages follow] L-8 [Signature Page to Right of First Purchase Option Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue)] 4820-3049-8044\4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. AUTHORITY: HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: _________________________________________ ___________________, Chair By: _________________________________________ ___________________, Secretary STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of ____________, 20__, by ___________________ and ___________________, the Chair and Secretary respectively, of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of said Authority. ____________________________________________ Notary Public L-9 [Signature Page to Right of First Purchase Option Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue)] 4820-3049-8044\4 OWNER: EDEN AVENUE GROUP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: Eden Avenue Partners, LLC, its Manager By: _________________________________________ Name: Nicholas Walton Its: Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of ______, 202___, by Nicholas Walton, the Manager of Eden Avenue Partners, LLC, Manager of Eden Avenue Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. Notary Public THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Dorsey & Whitney LLP 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 L-10 [Exhibit A to Right of First Purchase Option Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue)] 4820-3049-8044\4 Exhibit A Legal Description of the Property Tracts A and C, Registered Land Survey No. 1501, Hennepin County, Minnesota L-11 4820-3049-8044\4 CONSENT AND SUBORDINATION The undersigned, ___________________, a ___________________, holder of that certain [Mortgage] executed by Eden Avenue Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, dated ________________, 20____, filed ________________, 201__, as Document No. ___________, in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and filed ________________, 20____, as Document No. ___________, in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, in favor of ________________ (the “Mortgage”), hereby consents to the foregoing Right of First Purchase Option Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) (the “Purchase Option Agreement”), and hereby subjects and subordinates the Mortgage and all of its right, title and interest in and to the Purchase Option Agreement. ___________________________________, a ___________________ By: _________________________________________ Name: _______________________________________ Title: ________________________________________ STATE OF ______________ ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ______________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of ____________, 20______, by ____________________, the _________________ of ___________________, a ___________________, on behalf of the ___________________. ____________________________________________ Notary Public THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Dorsey & Whitney LLP 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 M-1 4828-9419-6988\3 Exhibit M Form of Parking Easement Agreement PARKING EASEMENT AGREEMENT (4917 Eden Avenue) THIS PARKING EASEMENT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into this ___ day of ____________, 202__ (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Edina, Minnesota, a Minnesota statutory city (the “City”), and Eden Avenue Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Owner”). RECITALS: A. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”), the City, and Owner, as “Developer”, are parties to that certain Redevelopment Agreement dated November 3, 2021 (the “Redevelopment Agreement”). B. The Redevelopment Agreement provides for the redevelopment by Owner of certain real property located at 4917 Eden Avenue, as legally described on the attached Exhibit A (the “Property”) C. The Property is located within the Eden / Willson Tax Incremental Financing District, established by the Authority pursuant to Resolution No. 2021-12, in coordination with the Authority and with the cooperation and assistance of the City. D. The Redevelopment Agreement provides for the expenditure of certain public funds to assist in the redevelopment of the Property with certain “Minimum Improvements” consisting generally of a 7-story, mixed-use building, collectively including, without limitation, approximately 196 housing units, a 3,400 square feet restaurant, 277 stalls of structured parking, and related site improvements. E. The Minimum Improvements also includes a total of 29 at-grade public parking stalls (the “Public Parking”), which such Public Parking is located on that portion of the Property legally described and depicted on the attached Exhibit B (the “Parking Premises”). F. The City and Owner have agreed in the Redevelopment Agreement that Owner shall grant an easement to the City pursuant to which the Public Parking will be permanently open and accessible to the general public for parking purposes pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. G. Owner has agreed to own, operate, manage, and maintain the Public Parking pursuant and subject to the terms and conditions of the Redevelopment Agreement and this Agreement. H. The City and Owner deem it to be in their interests and in furtherance of the economic development and redevelopment plan for the Property reflected in the Redevelopment Agreement to enter into this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the others as follows: M-2 4828-9419-6988\3 ARTICLE I GRANT OF EASEMENTS 1.1 Grant of Parking Easement. Owner hereby grants and conveys to the City, for the benefit of the City and the general public: (a) a non-exclusive, perpetual public easement over, across, upon and through the Public Premises, for the purpose of the general public utilizing the Public Parking for vehicular parking and utilizing such ancillary amenities, if any, all in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement; and (b) a non-exclusive, perpetual public easement over, across, upon and through all means of pedestrian and vehicular access to and from public rights of way, streets, alleys, public spaces, and easements appurtenant and/or used in connection with the Parking Premises located on the Property and adjoining or contiguous to the Parking Premises, all as depicted on the attached Exhibit B (collectively, the “Access Premises”, and together with the Parking Premises, collectively the “Easement Premises”), all in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. ARTICLE II TERM 2.1 Term. The easements granted hereby, and each reservation, covenant, condition and restriction contained in this Agreement, shall be effective as of the date hereof, shall be perpetual, and shall remain in effect until affirmatively released by the City. Such release shall be evidenced by the recording of a release or termination of this Agreement in the real estate records of Hennepin County, Minnesota, at which time this Agreement shall terminate, and the Public Parking and any other areas of the Easement Premises shall thereafter belong to and be under the sole control of Owner. ARTICLE III USE OF EASEMENT PREMISES 3.1 Operation and Control of Easement Premises. During the term of this Agreement, Owner shall operate the Easement Premises in accordance with this Agreement and all applicable governmental laws, ordinances, regulations and orders, at Owner’s sole cost and expense. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Owner has full authority and control over the management, operation, and use of the Easement Premises; provided, however, parking within the Public Parking shall be free of charge and Owner shall not charge any fee for the use of the Public Parking. 3.2 Signage. Owner shall install and maintain a prominent, permanent “Public Parking” sign at or near each vehicular entrance to the Public Parking areas, which such signage shall be subject to the City Manager’s prior written approval, not to be unreasonably, or delayed. 3.3 Waste, Nuisance, Damage, Disfigurement or Injury to Easement Premises. Neither the City nor Owner shall knowingly or willfully commit or suffer to be committed any waste or damage in or upon the Easement Premises, or any disfigurement or injury to any improvements hereafter erected or located upon the Easement Premises, or any part thereof, or the fixtures and/or equipment thereof. Owner, in its use and occupancy of the Easement Premises, shall not knowingly and willfully commit or suffer to be M-3 4828-9419-6988\3 committed any act or thing which constitutes a nuisance. Usual and normal wear and tear, damage by the elements, unavoidable casualty or depreciation and diminution over time shall not be considered “waste,” “nuisance,” “damage, “disfigurement,” or “injury.” 3.4 Owner’s Reservation of Certain Rights. The City’s easement rights under this Agreement shall be subject to the following reservations, as well as the other applicable provisions contained in this Agreement: (a) Owner reserves the right to close-off any portion of the Easement Premises for such reasonable period of time as may be legally necessary, in the opinion of Owner’s counsel, to prevent the acquisition of prescriptive rights by anyone; provided, however, that prior to closing- off any portion of the Easement Premises, Owner shall give as much written notice as reasonably practicable of its intention to do so. (b) Owner reserves the right at any time and from time to time to exclude and restrain any private party from access to the Public Parking for cause and on a non-discriminatory basis. (c) Owner reserves the right to temporarily erect or place barriers in and around areas on the Easement Premises which are being constructed and/or repaired in order to ensure either safety of persons or protection of property. (d) Owner reserves the right to adopt and enforce reasonable rules and regulations for the safe, efficient, and orderly use and operation of the Easement Premises, so long as such rules and regulations are applied on a non-discriminatory basis, do not adversely impact the City’s or the public’s rights to use of the Easement Premises as set forth in this Agreement, and are approved by the City Manager or its designee. ARTICLE IV MAINTENANCE OF THE EASEMENT PREMISES 4.1 Maintenance. At all times during the term hereof, Owner, at its cost and expense, shall keep and maintain the Easement Premises and the other Minimum Improvements in good condition and repair in a first-class manner, similar to that of other surface parking facilities located within other first-class, multi-use projects in the Minneapolis-Saint Paul metropolitan area, which such maintenance shall include, without limitation, the following: (a) all repairs, replacements, renewals, alterations, additions and betterments thereto, interior and exterior, structural and non-structural, ordinary and extraordinary, and foreseen and unforeseen, all as may be necessary to keep the Easement Premises and the other Minimum Improvements in the condition and repair required by this Agreement, and which are consistent with the requirements of the City Approvals and the Redevelopment Agreement, and which do not adversely impact the City’s or the public’s rights to use of the Easement Premises as set forth in this Agreement; (b) maintaining all drive and parking surfaces in a smooth and evenly-covered condition, which maintenance work shall include cleaning, sweeping, restriping, repairing and resurfacing the same; (c) maintaining in good working order (including cleaning and painting as necessary), repairing, and replacing as necessary the Access Premises; M-4 4828-9419-6988\3 (d) maintaining in good working order, repairing, and replacing as necessary all domestic water, sewer, storm water, gas, electricity, power, heat, telephone, other communications service, commercially reasonable security and life safety systems, and any and all other utility or similar services used, rendered, or supplied, upon, at, from, or in connection with the Easement Premises; (e) periodic removal of all papers, debris, filth, refuse, ice and snow, provided all sweeping shall be at appropriate intervals during such times as shall not unreasonably interfere with the use of the Easement Premises; (f) placing, keeping in repair, replacing and repainting any appropriate directional signs or markers, within or associated with the Easement Premises; (g) operating, keeping in repair, cleaning and replacing when necessary such Easement Premises lighting facilities as may be reasonably required, including without limitation all lighting necessary or appropriate for security of the Easement Premises; 4.2 No Obligation of the City to Repair or Maintain. The City shall have no obligation of any kind, expressed or implied, to repair, rebuild, restore, reconstruct, modify, alter, replace, or maintain the Easement Premises or any part thereof. ARTICLE V TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS 5.1 Payment of Taxes and Assessments. Owner shall pay, or cause to be paid, before becoming delinquent, all real estate taxes, charges, assessments, and levies, assessed and levied by any governmental taxing authority during the term of this Agreement against the Easement Premises and the other Minimum Improvements. Subject to the terms of the Redevelopment Agreement, Owner shall have the right and option, at any time but solely at Owner’s expense, to pay any real estate taxes or assessments in installments or under protest or in a similar manner, or to contest the levy or amount of the same in appropriate legal or administrative proceedings. ARTICLE VI INDEMNIFICATION, INSURANCE 6.1 Indemnification of the City. Except to the extent caused by the willful misconduct or gross negligence of the City, its employees or agents, or the general public, or arising out of the default by the City and its officers, employees or agents, of obligations made pursuant to a contract with Owner, including this Agreement, Owner hereby covenants and agrees to assume and to permanently indemnify and save harmless the City and its employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, damages, costs, expenses, reasonable attorneys’ fees, and liability in connection with the loss of life, personal injury and/or damage to property, to the extent arising from or out of the design or initial construction, maintenance and operation of the Easement Premises, or in connection with the use or occupancy of the Easement Premises, or any part thereof, by Owner, or to the extent arising out of the breach of Owner’s obligations hereunder. 6.2 Property Insurance. At all times during the term hereof, Owner, at its sole cost and expense, shall keep the Easement Premises and the other Minimum Improvements, and all alterations, extensions, and improvements thereto and replacements thereof, insured, in the amount of the full replacement cost M-5 4828-9419-6988\3 thereof and with such deductibles as Owner deems appropriate, against loss or damage by fire and against those casualties covered by extended coverage insurance and against vandalism and malicious mischief and against such other risks, of a similar or dissimilar nature, as are customarily covered with respect to improvements similar in construction, general location, use, and occupancy to such improvements. 6.3 Personal Property. All property of every kind and character which Owner may keep or store in, at, upon, or about the Easement Premises shall be kept and stored at the sole risk, cost, and expense of Owner. 6.4 Liability Insurance. During the term of this Agreement, Owner shall procure and maintain continuously in effect (or shall cause the same to occur), the following policies of insurance of the kind and minimum amounts as are customarily maintained with respect to facilities and improvements similar to those located on the Easement Premises, at commercially reasonable coverage levels, to be reviewed from time to time by Owner: (a) insurance against liability (including passenger elevator liability) for injuries to or death of any person or damage to or loss of property arising out of or in any way relating to the use, occupancy, or condition of the Easement Premises, or any part thereof, including insuring the indemnification obligations set forth in Section 6.1 above, which such insurance shall provide that the City is an additional insured; (b) garage keepers’ liability insurance including coverage for: (i) Fire and explosion; (ii) Theft (of entire vehicle); and (iii) Riot, civil commotion, malicious mischief, and vandalism. 6.5 General Insurance Requirement. All insurance required in this Agreement shall be placed with financially sound and reputable insurers licensed to transact business in the State of Minnesota. Owner shall promptly following the City’s request therefor, furnish the City with copies of policies evidencing all such insurance or a certificate or certificates of the respective insurers stating that such insurance is in force and effect. Each policy of insurance herein required shall contain a provision that the insurer shall not cancel it without giving written notice to the City at least 10 days before the cancellation becomes effective. The insurance coverage herein required may be provided by a blanket insurance policy or policies. 6.6 No Obligation of the City for Insurance. At no time and under no circumstances shall the City be required to take out, maintain in force and effect, or pay for any type of insurance coverage with reference to the protection of and/or ownership of and/or occupancy of and/or a suit relating to the Easement Premises and/or any improvements hereafter located thereon. ARTICLE VII ASSIGNMENT 7.1 Assignment by the City. During the term of this Agreement, the City may not assign or transfer its interest under this Agreement without the prior written consent of Owner. 7.2 Assignment by Owner. Owner may assign or otherwise transfer its interest under this Agreement in connection with any sale or transfer of the Minimum Improvements subject to the terms and M-6 4828-9419-6988\3 conditions of the Redevelopment Agreement. The City shall recognize and approve any successors or assigns of Owner. ARTICLE VIII CASUALTY 8.1 Destruction. In the event that all or any part of the Easement Premises and/or other portions of the Minimum Improvements are destroyed by fire or other casualty, and subject to a determination by the relevant mortgage lender, Owner shall promptly rebuild, reconstruct and/or restore the same to the extent insurance proceeds are available or, in the event insurance proceeds are not sufficient to reconstruct and/or restore the same, to the extent insurance proceeds combined with any contributions by Owner toward reconstruction are available. ARTICLE IX EMINENT DOMAIN 9.1 Major Condemnation. If all of the Easement Premises is taken, acquired, or condemned by eminent domain for any public or quasi-public use or purpose, this Agreement shall terminate as of the date of vesting of title in the condemning authority. Each party shall make its own claim in the condemnation proceeding based upon the value of its respective interest in the Easement Premises. ARTICLE X DEFAULT AND REMEDIES 10.1 Default By Owner. If Owner fails to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement, and fails to cure such default after 30 days’ written notice of such failure or, if such failure cannot reasonably be cured within such 30 days, fails to commence curative action and thereafter diligently complete the same, then, in such case, the City may pursue all available remedies at law and in equity, and the City may, but shall not be obligated to, cure such failure on behalf of Owner and Owner shall pay to the City all sums due and owing on account thereof. The City shall submit a statement to Owner evidencing the costs incurred to cure such failure. If Owner has failed to make payment in accordance with the statement within 60 days after receipt thereof, the City shall have the right to assess the costs incurred by the City to all or any portion of the Property as a service charge pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.101, or any successor statute. ARTICLE XI MISCELLANEOUS 11.1 Notices. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, a notice, demand or other communication under this Agreement by any party to any other shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is (a) dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, (b) sent by recognized overnight courier (such as Federal Express), or (c) delivered personally, as follows: In the case of Owner: At the address of record for real property tax assessment notices with respect to the applicable Parcel, or at such other address as either party shall have specified by written M-7 4828-9419-6988\3 notice delivered in accordance with this section. with a copy to (so long The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company as Eden Avenue Group, Attention: Real Estate Investment Department LLC is the Owner): 720 East Wisconsin Avenue Milwaukee, WI 53202 In the case of the City: City of Edina Attn: City Manager 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 with a copy to: Dorsey & Whitney LLP Attn: Jay Lindgren 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address with respect to any such party as that party may, from time to time, designate in writing and forward to the other, as provided in this Section. 11.2 Survival. The easements granted hereby and each reservation, covenant, condition and restriction contained in this Agreement will run with the land and will be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, as the case may be, Owner and the City and their respective successors and assigns. 11.3 Dedication. Nothing contained in this Agreement will be deemed to be a gift or dedication of any portion of the Easement Premises to the general public, except as explicitly set forth in this Agreement. 11.4 Waiver. The waiver by any party hereto of any breach or default of any provisions anywhere contained in this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach or default thereof. No provision of this Agreement shall be deemed to have been waived by any party hereto unless such waiver is in writing and signed by the party charged with any such waiver. 11.5 Joinder; Permitted Encumbrance. Except for the mortgagee consent attached hereto, this Agreement does not require the joinder or approval of any other person and each of the parties respectfully has the full, unrestricted and exclusive legal right and power to enter into this Agreement for the term and upon the provisions herein recited and for the use and purposes hereinabove set forth. This Agreement shall constitute a permitted encumbrance under any loan agreement heretofore or hereafter entered into between Owner and any construction lender or permanent lender. 11.6 Amendments. Except as otherwise herein provided, and not otherwise, no subsequent alteration, amendment, change, waiver, discharge, termination, deletion, or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon either party unless in writing and signed by both parties. 11.7 Attorneys’ Fees. In case any action at law or in equity, including an action for declaratory relief, is brought against Owner to enforce the provisions of this Agreement, Owner agrees to pay the reasonable attorneys’ fees and other reasonable expenses paid or incurred by the Authority in connection with the action. 11.8 Governing Law. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the state of Minnesota and, M-8 4828-9419-6988\3 where applicable, the laws of the United States of America. 11.9 Severability. If any provisions hereof shall be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining portions shall not in any way be affected or impaired. 11.10 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument [Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature pages follow] M-9 [Signature Page to Parking Easement Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue)] 4828-9419-6988\3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. CITY: CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: ______________________________________ ___________________, Mayor By: ______________________________________ ___________________, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _____________, 20___, by ____________ and ____________, the Mayor and City Manager respectively, of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of the City. __________________________________________ Notary Public M-10 [Signature Page to Parking Easement Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue)] 4828-9419-6988\3 OWNER: EDEN AVENUE GROUP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: Eden Avenue Partners, LLC, its Manager By: _________________________________________ Name: Nicholas Walton Its: Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of ______, 2021, by Nicholas Walton, the Manager of Eden Avenue Partners, LLC, Manager of Eden Avenue Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. Notary Public THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Dorsey & Whitney LLP 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 M-11 [Exhibit A to Parking Easement Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue)] 4828-9419-6988\3 Exhibit A Legal Description of the Property Tracts A and C, Registered Land Survey No. 1501, Hennepin County, Minnesota M-12 [Exhibit B to Parking Easement Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue)] 4828-9419-6988\3 Exhibit B Legal Description and Depiction of the Parking Premises and the Access Premises [Depiction for illustrative purposes; final exhibit to be updated based on final plans/construction prior to easement execution.] M-13 4828-9419-6988\3 CONSENT AND SUBORDINATION The undersigned, ___________________, a ___________________, holder of that certain [Mortgage] executed by Eden Avenue Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, dated ________________, 20____, filed ________________, 20____, as Document No. ___________, in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and filed ________________, 20____, as Document No. ___________, in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, in favor of ________________ (the “Mortgage”), hereby consents to the foregoing Parking Easement Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) (the “Easement Agreement”), and hereby subjects and subordinates the Mortgage and all of its right, title and interest in and to the Easement Agreement. ___________________________________, a ___________________ By: _________________________________________ Name: _______________________________________ Title: ________________________________________ STATE OF ______________ ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ______________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of ____________, 20______, by ____________________, the _________________ of ___________________, a ___________________, on behalf of the ___________________. ____________________________________________ Notary Public N-1 4891-1861-9392\1 Exhibit N Intentionally omitted. O-1 4817-4255-3597\3 Exhibit O Form of Future Land Agreement PUBLIC EASEMENT & ACQUISITION AGREEMENT (4917 Eden Avenue) THIS PUBLIC EASEMENT & ACQUISITION AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into this ___ day of ____________, 202___ (“Effective Date”), by and among the City of Edina, Minnesota, a Minnesota statutory city (the “City”), and Eden Avenue Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Owner”). RECITALS: A. The City, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”), and Owner, as “Developer”, are parties to that certain Redevelopment Agreement dated November 3, 2021 (the “Redevelopment Agreement”). B. The Redevelopment Agreement provides for the redevelopment by Owner of certain real property legally described on the attached Exhibit A (referred to herein and in the Redevelopment Agreement as the “Project Area”) and located within the Eden / Willson Tax Incremental Financing District, established by the Authority pursuant to Resolution No. 2021-12, in coordination with the Authority and with the cooperation and assistance of the City. C. The Redevelopment Agreement provides for the expenditure of certain public funds to assist in the redevelopment of the Project Area with certain “Minimum Improvements” consisting generally of a seven-story, mixed-use building, including, approximately 196 rental apartment units, an approximately 3,400 square-foot restaurant, 277 stalls of structured parking, and related site improvements. D. The City, Authority and Owner have agreed in the Redevelopment Agreement that Owner shall grant an easement to the City pursuant to which the City shall have to use that portion of the Project Area legally described on Exhibit B-1 and generally depicted and designated on Exhibit B-2 attached hereto (the “Public Land”) for any public use, as further described herein (the “Public Easement”). E. The City, Authority and Owner have further agreed in the Redevelopment Agreement that the City (or the Authority) shall have a future right to convert its interest in the Public Land from an easement to fee title for payment of $1.00. F. As provided herein, Owner shall also grant certain temporary construction easements over that portion of the Project Area legally described and/or generally depicted on the attached Exhibit C (the “Temporary Easement Area”) for the purpose of access and construction activities related to any public improvements to be constructed on the Public Land (the “Future Public Improvements”). NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the others as follows: O-2 4817-4255-3597\3 1. Recitals; Definitions. The Recitals are true and correct statements of fact and are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference, including the definitions set forth therein. Each capitalized term used herein and the Recitals, unless otherwise defined, shall have the respective meaning ascribed to such term in the Redevelopment Agreement. 2. Public Easement. Owner hereby grants and conveys to the City, for the benefit of the City, its agents, contractors, employees, and permitted assigns, an exclusive, perpetual easement over, across, upon and through the Public Land, for the purpose of utilizing the Public Land for any public use. For purposes of this Agreement, “public use” shall mean (i) transportation routes and improvements, including, but not limited to: roadways, sidewalks, trails and wayfinding systems, (ii) infrastructure and utility uses and improvements, including but not limited to, water, sewer, stormwater, communication, telecommunication, energy generation and transmission; and including both publicly owned and privately owned utilities, and/or (iii) green or other open space for landscaping, gardening, public art, public gathering and/or similar uses, together with related improvements. 3. Future Right to Acquire Fee Interest. Upon and subject to the terms hereof, Owner hereby grants to the City, and the City hereby accepts, an option (the “Acquisition Option”) to acquire Owner’s fee title interest in the Public Land, together with all easements and other rights benefiting or appurtenant to the Public Land (collectively, the “Property”), for a purchase price of $1.00 (the “Acquisition Price”). The City may exercise the Acquisition Option at any time by the City giving written notice to Owner of the City’s election to exercise the Acquisition Option (the “Election Notice”). 4. Owner Obligations. In connection with the Acquisition Option, Owner shall: (a) within 15 days after receipt of the Election Notice, Owner shall deliver to the City a current commitment (the “Commitment”) for an ALTA Form Owner’s Policy of Title Insurance (“Title Policy”) insuring title to the Property issued by a reputable title company (the “Title Company”), legible copies of all documents cited, raised as exceptions or noted in the title commitment and Owner’s most recent survey of the Property; (b) by no later than the Closing Date (define below), cause the Public Land to be legally subdivided in accordance with applicable legal requirements and make the Public Land a separate legal parcel and a separate tax parcel; (c) at Closing, deliver the Public Land free and clear of all liens, tenancies, encumbrances, and other interests except those approved by the City in its sole and absolute discretion (the “Permitted Encumbrances”) (provided, if necessary, at Closing, the City, the Authority, and Owner, as applicable, shall join in a partial release of the Redevelopment Agreement, the Affordable Housing Restrictive Covenant, and the Right of First Purchase Option). 5. Closing. The closing of the Acquisition Option (the “Closing”) shall occur on a date mutually acceptable to the City and Owner, but no later than 120 days after the City delivers its Election Notice to Owner (the “Closing Date”). Owner agrees to deliver exclusive possession of the Property to the City on the Closing Date, subject only to Permitted Encumbrances. 6. Closing Deliveries. (a) Owner’s Closing Deliveries. On the Closing Date, Owner shall execute and deliver to the City the following, all in form and content reasonably satisfactory to the City: (i) a limited warranty deed (the “Deed”) conveying the Property to the City subject only to the Permitted Encumbrances; (ii) a non-foreign affidavit, properly executed, containing such information as is O-3 4817-4255-3597\3 required by Internal Revenue Code Section 1445(b)(2) and its regulations; and (iii) such affidavits, certificates or other documents as may be reasonably required by the Title Company in order to record the Deed and issue the Title Policy, subject only to Permitted Encumbrances. (b) The City’s Closing Deliveries. On the Closing Date, the City will execute and/or deliver to Owner the following: (i) Acquisition Price; and (ii) such affidavits, certificates or other documents as may be reasonably required by Title Company in order to record the Deed and issue the Title Policy. 7. Prorations. Owner and the City agree to the following prorations and allocation of costs regarding this Agreement and Property acquired by the City: (a) Title Charges and Closing Fee. Owner shall pay the cost of the Title Commitment and removing any title defects or encumbrances which are not Permitted Encumbrances. The City will pay all title insurance premiums required for the issuance of the Title Policy, including the cost of all additional endorsements thereto. Owner will pay any closing fee or charge imposed by Title Company. (b) Taxes. Owner shall pay all state deed tax or transfer tax or fee payable in connection with this transaction. Special assessments, if any, shall be paid in full by Owner on or before the Closing Date. Real estate taxes shall be prorated as of the Closing Date. Accordingly, Owner shall pay all real estate taxes due and payable up to the Closing Date and the City shall pay all real estate taxes due and payable on and after the Closing Date. (c) Other Income and Expenses. All income (including, without limitation, rents) and other expenses shall be prorated and adjusted as of the Closing Date. (d) Attorney’s Fees. Each of the parties will pay its own attorney’s fees. 8. Warranties and Representations by Owner. Owner warrants and represents to the City as follows: (a) Owner has the requisite power and authority (including all necessary approvals and authorizations) to enter into and perform this Agreement and those closing documents to be signed by it; such documents have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of Owner and have been or will be duly executed and delivered; such execution, delivery and performance by Owner of such documents does not and will not conflict with or result in a violation of any judgment, order, or decree of any court or arbiter to which Owner is a party, or any law, statute, rule or regulation by which Owner is bound; such documents are and will be valid and binding obligations of Owner, and are and will be enforceable in accordance with their terms. (b) As of the Closing Date, the Property is free and clear of all encumbrances, except the Permitted Encumbrances. 9. Temporary Construction Easement. (a) Grant of Temporary Construction Easements. Owner hereby grants and conveys to the City, for the benefit of the City, its agents, contractors, employees, and permitted assigns, (i) a temporary, non-exclusive easement on, over, across, upon and through the Temporary Easement Area for Construction Activities (defined below) related to any Future Public Improvements and (ii) a temporary, non-exclusive easement over and across the Project Area (subject to any height O-4 4817-4255-3597\3 limitation imposed by any crane permit or applicable law) for the purpose of rotating and operating a crane boom as necessary to facilitate construction of any Future Public Improvements. The City shall give Owner at least 30 days’ prior notice before beginning to exercise any of its easement rights under this Section, which such easement rights may be exercised one or more times as part of any Future Public Improvements on the Public Land. (b) Construction Activities. For purposes of this Agreement, “Construction Activities” are, collectively: (i) the right to perform demolition, excavation, environmental remediation, grading, and re-grading, including, without limitation, the right to maintain a properly engineered slope cut excavation, shoring, sheeting, scaffolding and/or tie-backs; (ii) the right to pass and repass on, over, through and across the Temporary Easement Area, with personnel, vehicles, and equipment; (iii) the right to park, place, store, replace, remove, maintain, repair, use and occupy personnel trailers, vehicles, and equipment; (iv) the right to load, unload, lay down and store materials, debris, excess soil and/or grading materials; (v) the right to enclose, secure and/or patrol any portion of the Temporary Easement Area; (vi) the right to perform the restoration of the Temporary Easement Area pursuant to this Agreement; and (vii) the right to exercise such other rights as are reasonably necessary to facilitate the Construction Activities. (c) Restoration of Temporary Easement Area. Promptly following the completion of any Future Public Improvements, the City shall be responsible for repairing and restoring any portion of the Temporary Easement Area that is damaged or disturbed by Construction Activities to substantially the condition existing prior to such damage at no cost to Owner. 10. Condemnation; Casualty. If eminent domain proceedings are commenced against all or a part of the Property, or if all or a substantial part of the property is damaged by fire or other casualty, on or before the Closing Date, Owner shall immediately give written notice to the City, and the City shall have the right to terminate any exercised Acquisition Option by giving written notice of such termination to Owner within 30 days after Owner’s notice of such proceedings is given to the City. If the City shall fail to give such notice, then the parties shall proceed to Closing, and Owner shall assign to the City all rights to appear in and receive any award from such proceedings and/or any insurance proceeds, as applicable. 11. Remedies. If the City defaults in performance of its obligations under the Acquisition Option, Owner shall have the right to terminate this Agreement in the manner provided by Minn. Stat. Sec. 559.21 (inclusive of a minimum 30-day notice and right to cure) as its sole and exclusive remedy. In no event shall Owner shall have any right to assert any claim for monetary or other compensatory damages against the City with respect to any alleged breach of this Agreement by the City and Owner will not be entitled to recover damages of any kind, including lost profits and direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or punitive damages arising from any such breach. If Owner defaults in performance of its obligations under this Agreement, the City may take any action, including legal or administrative action, in law or equity, which may appear necessary or desirable to enforce performance and observance of any obligation, agreement or covenant of Owner under this Agreement. 12. Term. The easements, rights, and other interests granted hereby, and each reservation, covenant, condition and restriction contained in this Agreement, shall be effective as of the date hereof, shall be perpetual, and shall remain in effect only if affirmatively released by the City. Such release shall be evidenced by the recording of a release or termination of this Agreement in the real estate records of Hennepin County, Minnesota, at which time this Agreement shall terminate, subject to reconciliation of expenses and obligations incurred through the date of release or termination and the continuation of those provisions that specifically survive termination of this Agreement. O-5 4817-4255-3597\3 13. Notices. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, a notice, demand or other communication under this Agreement by any party to any other shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is (a) dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, (b) sent by recognized overnight courier (such as Federal Express), or (c) delivered personally, as follows: In the case of Owner: At the address of record for real property tax assessment notices with respect to the applicable Parcel, or at such other address as either party shall have specified by written notice delivered in accordance with this section. with a copy to (so long as The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company Eden Avenue Group, LLC Attention: Real Estate Investment Department is the Owner): 720 East Wisconsin Avenue Milwaukee, WI 53202 In the case of the Authority: Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota Attention: Executive Director 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 with a copy to: Dorsey & Whitney LLP Attn: Jay Lindgren 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 In the case of the City: City of Edina Attn: City Manager 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 with a copy to: Dorsey & Whitney LLP Attn: Jay Lindgren 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address with respect to any such party as that party may, from time to time, designate in writing and forward to the other, as provided in this Section. 14. Successors and Assigns. The easements, rights, and other interests granted hereby and each reservation, covenant, condition and restriction contained in this Agreement will run with the land and will be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, as the case may be, Owner and the City and their respective successors and assigns. The City, its successors and assigns, may assign or otherwise transfer its interest under this Agreement and/or all or a portions of its rights hereunder (e.g., through granting of leases, easements, etc.) hereunder to any other public entity (including, without limitation, the Authority) or any private entity so long as such private entity’s use constitutes a public use hereunder (e.g., a private utility provider) , in each case, without the consent of Owner. Owner may transfer the Land and assign its interest under this Agreement to a transferee subject to the terms and conditions of the Redevelopment Agreement. Except as provided in this Section 13, neither party may assign or otherwise transfer its interest under this Agreement without the other parties’ prior written consent. O-6 4817-4255-3597\3 15. Waiver. The waiver by any party hereto of any breach or default of any provisions anywhere contained in this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach or default thereof. No provision of this Agreement shall be deemed to have been waived by any party hereto unless such waiver is in writing and signed by the party charged with any such waiver. 16. Joinder; Permitted Encumbrance. Except for the mortgagee consent attached hereto, this Agreement does not require the joinder or approval of any other person and each of the parties respectfully has the full, unrestricted and exclusive legal right and power to enter into this Agreement for the term and upon the provisions herein recited and for the use and purposes hereinabove set forth. This Agreement shall constitute a permitted encumbrance under any loan agreement heretofore or hereafter entered into between Owner and any construction lender or permanent lender. 17. Amendments. Except as otherwise herein provided, and not otherwise, no subsequent alteration, amendment, change, waiver, discharge, termination, deletion, or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon either party unless in writing and signed by both parties. 18. Attorneys’ Fees. In case any action at law or in equity, including an action for declaratory relief, is brought against Owner to enforce the provisions of this Agreement, Owner agrees to pay the reasonable attorneys’ fees and other reasonable expenses paid or incurred by the Authority in connection with the action. 19. Governing Law. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the state of Minnesota and, where applicable, the laws of the United States of America. 20. Severability. If any provisions hereof shall be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining portions shall not in any way be affected or impaired. 21. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature pages follow] O-7 [Signature Page to Public Easement & Acquisition Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue)] 4817-4255-3597\3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. CITY: CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: __________________________________ ___________________, Mayor By: ___________________, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _____________, 20___, by ____________ and ____________, the Mayor and City Manager respectively, of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of the City. Notary Public O-8 [Signature Page to Public Easement & Acquisition Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue)] 4817-4255-3597\3 OWNER: EDEN AVENUE GROUP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: Eden Avenue Partners, LLC, its Manager By: __________________________________ Name: Nicholas Walton Its: Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of ______, 202___, by Nicholas Walton, the Manager of Eden Avenue Partners, LLC, Manager of Eden Avenue Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. Notary Public THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Dorsey & Whitney LLP 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 O-9 4817-4255-3597\3 Exhibit A Legal Description of the Project Area Tracts A and C, Registered Land Survey No. 1501, Hennepin County, Minnesota O-10 4817-4255-3597\3 Exhibit B-1 Legal Description of the Public Land [To be determined by Owner and updated prior to easement execution.] O-11 4817-4255-3597\3 Exhibit B-2 Depiction of the Public Land [Depiction for illustrative purposes; final exhibit to be updated based on final plans/construction prior to easement execution.] O-12 4817-4255-3597\3 Exhibit C Depiction of Temporary Easement Area [Depiction for illustrative purposes; final exhibit to be updated based on final plans/construction prior to easement execution.] O-13 4817-4255-3597\3 CONSENT AND SUBORDINATION The undersigned, ___________________, a ___________________, holder of that certain [Mortgage] executed by Eden Avenue Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, dated ________________, 20____, filed ________________, 201__, as Document No. ___________, in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and filed ________________, 20____, as Document No. ___________, in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, in favor of ________________ (the “Mortgage”), hereby consents to the foregoing Public Easement & Acquisition Agreement (4917 Eden Avenue) (the “Agreement”), and hereby subjects and subordinates the Mortgage and all of its right, title and interest in and to the Agreement. ___________________________________, a ___________________ By: _________________________________________ Name: _______________________________________ Title: ________________________________________ STATE OF ______________ ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ______________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of ____________, 20______, by ____________________, the _________________ of ___________________, a ___________________, on behalf of the ___________________. ____________________________________________ Notary Public P-1 4891-1861-9392\1 Exhibit P Equity and Inclusion Outreach Plan [See attached.] An Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity Employer Frana Companies is familiar with and well versed in the process in working towards the goals set forth by the cities of Minneapolis, St. Paul, and surrounding communities. We employ the following methods, among others, to meet the needs of our projects: • Affirmative Action – Frana Companies has an Affirmative Action Plan that is included as part of this package. • Small and Underutilized Business Program (SUBP) – Frana Companies has established relationships in the multi-family housing industry with the Women Business Enterprise (WBE), Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) and Section 3 subcontractors and material suppliers. We work closely with the subcontractor associations and labor trades, Summit Academy OIC, owners, and subcontractors/material suppliers to strive to meet the goals. Frana Companies works with smaller certified firms to create relationships with larger subcontractors to assist in larger commercial projects. Frana has specifically worked with and continues to partner with a smaller WBE and MBE drywall contractor. We assist this subcontractor with takeoffs, material purchasing power, and meeting cash requirements by paying more frequently than once per month. Frana Companies also works with subcontractors and suppliers to create smaller scopes of work to help gain opportunities for smaller MBE and WBE companies. With our own self-performed carpentry and cleaning crews, we have established a relationship with Summit Academy OIC to hire graduates, thus providing needed opportunities for those looking for a career in the construction industry. Projected goals for 4917 Eden Avenue, Edina, Minnesota: • Contracting Goals: 5% WBE and 4% MBE • Workforce Goals: 5% women hours and 10% people of color and indigenous people hours Based upon the current construction economy, COVID-19, and local workload, it has become increasingly more difficult to meet and or exceed goals. We will review all subcontracting bids for the work and will work towards meetings these goals; however, we have seen a number of contractors remove their bids from the process based upon their current workload, schedule, and availability to complete the work. Frana Companies General Contractors 633 Second Avenue South z Hopkins, Minnesota z 55343 www.frana.com An Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity Employer AFFIRMATIVE ACTION/EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY (AA/EEO) POLICY STATEMENT This statement is to affirm Frana Companies Inc. policy on providing Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) to all employees and applicants for employment in accordance with all applicable Affirmative Action Equal Employment Opportunity laws, directives, and regulations of federal, state, and local governing bodies or agencies. Frana Companies Inc. will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of age, ancestry,color, creed,disability,familial status, geneticinformation(genetictesting, familymedical history, and/or genetic services), marital status, national origin, public assistance status, race, religion, retaliation, retaliation by association, retaliation by opposition, sex, pregnancy, sexual or affection orientation. Frana Companies Inc. will maintain zero tolerance for harassment of or by any employee or applicant for employment because age, ancestry, color, disability, familial status, genetic information (genetic testing, family medical history, and/or genetic services), marital status, national origin, public assistance status, race, religion, retaliation, retaliation by association, retaliation by opposition, sex, pregnancy, sexual or affection orientation. We will maintain an internal complaint procedure for complaints of such harassment, and will provide employees with contact information for federal, state, and local enforcement agencies. Frana Companies Inc. will take Affirmative Action (AA) to ensure that all employment practices are free of such discrimination and harassment. Such employment practices include, but are not limited to, the following: hiring, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, selection, layoff, disciplinary action, termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship. Frana Companies Inc. fully supports incorporation of non-discrimination and affirmative action rules and regulations into contracts with subcontractors for goods and services. Frana Companies Inc. will commit the necessary time and resources, both financial and human, to achieve the goals of Affirmative Action and Equal Employment Opportunity. 633 Second Avenue S „ Hopkins, MN „ 55343 October 20, 2021 An Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity Employer Page 2 of 5 Frana Companies Inc. will evaluate the performance of its management and supervisory personnel based on their involvement in achieving these Affirmative Action and Equal Employment Opportunity objectives as well as other established criteria. Any employee of this organization, or subcontractors to this employer who do not comply with the Equal Employment Opportunity Policies and Procedures set forth in this Statement and Plan will be subject to disciplinary action. As well, any subcontractor not complying with all applicable Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action laws, directives and regulations of the federal, state and local governing bodies or agencies thereof, will be subject to appropriate legal sanctions Frana Companies Inc. has appointed Tom Lamberta / Kelly Mahon as AA/EEO Managers to manage the Equal Employment Opportunity Program. Their responsibilities will include monitoring all Equal Employment Opportunity activities and reporting the effectiveness of this Affirmative Action Plan (AAP), as required by federal, state and local agencies. They will be given the necessary top management support and staffing to fulfill their job duties. The President of Frana Companies Inc. will receive and review reports on the progress of the plan. If any employee or applicant for employment believes he/she has been discriminated against, please contact Tom Lamberta / Kelly Mahon at this address: 633 Second Avenue South, Hopkins, MN 55343 Mike Benedict President Signature of President Date Signature of President 10/20/2021 633 Second Avenue S „ Hopkins, MN „ 55343 October 20, 2021 An Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity Employer Page 3 of 5 REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS STATEMENT Frana Companies Inc. shall make reasonable accommodations to the physical and/or mental limitations of an employee or applicant unless such accommodations would impose an undue hardship on the function of the business. STATEMENT OF FAIR COMPENSATION In offering employment or promotions to disabled individuals, Frana Companies Inc. shall not reduce the amount of compensation offered because of any disability income, pension, or other benefit the applicant or employee receives from another source. PRE-EMPLOYMENT MEDICAL EXAM Frana Companies Inc. may require a person to undergo a physical examination, which may include a medical history, for the purpose of determining a person’s capability to perform available employment functions, provided that an offer of employment has been made. This offer would be contingent on the condition that the person meets the physical or mental requirements of the job and, that the examination tests only for essential job-related abilities. Information obtained in response to such inquiries or examination shall be kept confidential. Exceptions to the confidentiality rule may be when: (a) supervisors and managers may be informed regarding restrictions on the work or duties of disabled individuals because of reasonable accommodation needs; (b) first aid and safety personnel may be informed where, and to the extent appropriate, if the condition might require emergency treatment; and (c) officials, employees, representatives, or agents of the local, federal and state human rights agencies shall be informed when an investigation of compliance is being conducted in accordance with the local Ordinance or federal and state rights statutes. DISSEMINATION OF AA POLICY AND PLAN Internal Dissemination: The company will permanently and conspicuously display the policy statement in areas such as employee bulletin boards, lunch areas and construction sites. The company, as an equal opportunity employer, should print the policy statement in the company newsletter and other publications. 633 Second Avenue S „ Hopkins, MN „ 55343 October 20, 2021 An Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity Employer Page 4 of 5 The company will provide all employees and contractors a policy statement and notify same of location and availability of the affirmative action plan. This policy will be made available to all employees including part-time, temporary, or seasonal employees. The company’s EEO/AA policies will be included in the policy manual. The company will review their EEO/AA policies with all employees and management at least once a year. The company will also conduct orientation and training sessions to thoroughly inform staff and management of the company's EEO/AA commitment. The company will develop internal communication outlining the company’s obligation to engage in affirmative action efforts to employ qualified disabled individuals, women, and people of color and indigenous people. This will be done in order to foster acceptance, understanding and support between all employees, to include executive level, management, supervisory, administrative and line workers; and to encourage such persons to take the necessary action to aid the company in meeting this obligation. External Dissemination: The company will include non-discrimination clauses in all union agreements and will review all contractual provisions to ensure that they are non-discriminatory. The company will also meet with union officials to advise them of their EEO/AA policies and enlist their cooperation. The company will notify recruitment sources including those in Appendix G, of their EEO/AA policy and encourage them to refer people of color and indigenous people, women, and disabled individuals to assist the company in achieving their affirmative objectives. The company will include the statement, “Equal Opportunity Employer/Contractor” or “Affirmative Action Employer/Contractor” on all company stationery and letterhead, and in advertisements when recruiting employees and subcontractors. RECRUITMENT OF EMPLOYEES A. Frana Companies Inc. uses “protected class” when advertising new openings. Sufficient time is allowed after the publication of the ads to ensure that protected class applicants will have time to reply. 633 Second Avenue S „ Hopkins, MN „ 55343 October 20, 2021 An Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity Employer Page 5 of 5 Ǥ All solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of Frana Companies Inc. or our subcontractors will state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment regardless of their race, color, creed, religion, ancestry, national origin, sex, affectional preference, disability, age (over 40), marital status or status with regard to public assistance. Copies of advertisements for employees must be kept on file for review by enforcement agencies. Ǥ Frana Companies Inc. will contact unions and community organizations to request people of color and indigenous people, women, and disabled employees. When seeking to fill specific openings we will give the agencies a reasonable amount of time to locate and refer applicants to us. Frana Companies Inc. will use the Recruitment Resources List for agencies to locate protected class employees. Ǥ Frana Companies Inc. will encourage our current people of color and indigenous people, women, and disabled employees to recruit other people of color and indigenous people, women, and persons of disability, and, where reasonable, provide after school, summer and vacation employment to people of color and indigenous people, women, and youthful persons of disability, both onsite and in other areas of the workforce. Ǥ Frana Companies Inc. will take appropriate steps to give encouragement to people of color and indigenous people, women, and persons of disability to increase their skills and job potential through participation in available training and educational programs, including supervisory training classes. Ǥ Frana Companies Inc. and our subcontractors will make job opportunity information equally available to potential applicants from both protected and non-protected class groups, unless there is a bona fide occupational requirement for a particular job. We will not indicate, in help-wanted advertisements, any preference, limitation or specification based on gender, unless gender is a bona fide occupational qualification for a particular job involved. Ǥ Active recruitment programs, where applicable, will be carried out at secondary schools, community colleges and colleges with predominantly people of color and indigenous peopleǡ and women enrollments. Recruitment efforts at all schools will incorporate efforts to reach women, people of color and indigenous people, and persons of disability. Ǥ Recruitment brochures pictorially presenting work situations will include people of color and indigenous people, women, and disabled members of the workforce. Ǥ Special efforts should be made to include people of color and indigenous people, women, and disabled employees on personnel/human resources staff. Frana Companies, Inc. will commit the necessary time and resources, both financial and human, to achieve the goals of the Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action BUSINESS & EMPLOYMENT OUTREACH CHECKLIST EFFORTS TO SOLICIT AND INCLUDE DISADVANTAGED BUSINESSES AND WORKFORCE Solicited to organizations listed below: Builders Exchange Metropolitan Economic Development Association Association of Women Contractors National Association of Minority Contractors Latino Economic Development Finance and Commerce Summit Academy Spokesman Recorder Other: Attempted to break scopes of work down into smaller pieces to facilitate more participation Examples: Paid more in order to facilitate more participation Examples: Negotiated in good faith with all responsive bidders Examples: Rejected a quote from disadvantaged contractors after determining the cost of using the contractor was unreasonable to incur Examples: Qualifications reviewed with all responsive bidders: COVID-19 Supply chain issues Workforce of manufacturers Project timelines Do they have enough workforce to meet project schedule / timing? Contractors current and projected workload Other good faith efforts: Frana Companies General Contractors 633 Second Avenue South z Hopkins, Minnesota z 55343 www.frana.com Q-1 4840-9152-4093\3 Exhibit Q Form of Equity and Inclusion Report Project Name & Address: 4917 Eden Avenue, Edina, Minnesota Developer: Reuter Walton dba Eden Avenue Group, LLC General Contractor: [Frana] Construction Trade Total Hours Worked Hours Worked by Under-Represented Groups % Names of Employers BIPOC Men BIPOC Women Non-BIPOC Women Demolition __% Grading/Excavation __% Carpentry __% Concrete __% Masonry __% Electrical __% Plumbing __% Glass & Glazing __% Painting & Finishes __% Other __% Total __% NA BIPOC includes workers whose ethnicity includes black, indigenous and other people of color Q-2 4840-9152-4093\3 Summary of Certified* Women-Owned Business Enterprises Name of Business (common name and dba) City & State Description of Trade Value of Sub- Contract *Certified means any business entity that is formally recognized as a disadvantaged business entity (typically women-owned or minority-owned) by the State of Minnesota or other Minnesota-based entity. Summary of Certified* Minority-Owned Business Enterprises Name of Business (common name and dba) City & State Description of Trade Value of Sub- Contract *Certified means any business entity that is formally recognized as a disadvantaged business entity (typically women-owned or minority-owned) by the State of Minnesota or other Minnesota-based entity. Total Cost of General Contractor and Subcontracted Work: Total Subcontracted Work awarded to certified MBEs Total Subcontracted Work awarded to certified WBEs Combined total: $ _______ $ _______ $ _______ _______% Q-3 4840-9152-4093\3 Pursuant to and in accordance with Section 10 of that certain Redevelopment Agreement dated November 3, 2021 by and among the City of Edina, Minnesota, a Minnesota statutory city (the “City”), the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”), and Eden Avenue Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Developer”), Developer hereby represents, warrants, and certifies to the City and the Authority that the information provide in or connection with this report is true and correct in all material respects. EDEN AVENUE GROUP, LLC By: Eden Avenue Partners, LLC, its Manager By: _________________________________________ Name: Nicholas Walton Its: Manager The CITYofEDINA4917 Eden AvenueRedevelopment Agreement for Tax Increment FinancingEdina City CouncilNovember 3, 2021www.EdinaMN.gov The CITYofEDINA2Background - Current Conditions- 2.0 acre site- Built 1973- Restaurant with office and warehouse- Land value exceeds value of structure4917 The CITYofEDINA3GRANTED PRELIMINARY REZONING APPROVAL JULY 2021Background - Proposed Projectparking easementFutureroad easement The CITYofEDINA4Photo Source: Minnesota Historic SocietyBackground - Proposed ProjectGRANTED PRELIMINARY REZONING APPROVAL JULY 2021 The CITYofEDINA5Photo Source: Minnesota Historic SocietyGRANTED PRELIMINARY REZONING APPROVAL JULY 2021Background - Proposed ProjectFutureroad easementPublicparking easement The CITYofEDINA6Photo Source: Minnesota Historic SocietyGRANTED PRELIMINARY REZONING APPROVAL JULY 2021Background - Proposed ProjectGRANTED PRELIMINARY REZONING APPROVAL JULY 2021 The CITYofEDINA7Photo Source: Minnesota Historic SocietyBackground- Potential Public Roadway Improvements• Eden/Willson Intersection• 50th/ Grange Intersection• Eden Ave• Grange Road• 50thStreet The CITYofEDINA8Request for TIFDeveloper requested $5.1million over 15 years to make redevelopment project of this scale and quality financially viable.This request has been analyzed and evaluated.•A substantial budget gap has been confirmed. •Redevelopment Agreement has been prepared•Based on August 2021 Term Sheet•Staff recommends approval of Agreementgap The CITYofEDINA•Economic development financing tool used throughout the U.S.•Governed by Minnesota Statute•Enabled by City Council•“Tax Increment” Financing - uses growth in property tax base to fund private investment and public infrastructure9What is TIF?Growth of Property Tax BaseGrowth of Property Tax BaseGrowth of Property Tax BaseGrowth of Property Tax Base“Incremental Taxes” remain in TIF DistrictOriginal + Market Value Taxes available to all agenciesOriginal + Incremental Taxes available to all agenciesYear 1Year 15 Year 26Year 40+$3.0M$54.8M The CITYofEDINA10Staff Evaluation –Tax Base GrowthCurrent Current Current Current conditions conditions conditions conditions (2021)(2021)(2021)(2021)Estimate after Estimate after Estimate after Estimate after redevelopmentredevelopmentredevelopmentredevelopment(2024)(2024)(2024)(2024)PercentPercentPercentPercentChangeChangeChangeChangeEstimated Tax Capacity38,495 887,000 +2,200%Estimated Market Value$3.01 M$54.8 to $60.3 M+1,800%Annual Property Taxes Paid$99,960$739,092 to $813,668+739%•This degree of growth would not happen if the site was remodeled or rebuilt as a simple commercial structure•Redevelopment projects of this scale and caliber deliver a tremendous boost to the tax base•Without TIF, the proposed project does not appear to be viable The CITYofEDINA11Staff Evaluation – Public Benefits•High quality mixed-use development•Increase property tax base•Improve storm water conditions•Public sidewalks and streetscapes, including public art•Affordable housing (20 units for 21 years)•Public parking (29 stalls)•Land for future public use (roadway)•Enable adjacent public roadway improvements The CITYofEDINA12Staff Evaluation – Sources and UsesUSESUSESUSESUSES AmountAmountAmountAmountPercentPercentPercentPercentAcquisition and Land Costs$ 12,000,00014.1%Construction Hard Costs including:$ 63,607,99974.8%Parking12,188,680Soil Correction & Remediation750,000Public Plaza with public art200,000Contingency2,550,0003.0%Soft Costs including:$ 12,011,12014.1%Developer Fee$ 2,895,0003.4%Financing Costs$ 4,290,9805.0%TOTALTOTALTOTALTOTAL$85,069,119SOURCESSOURCESSOURCESSOURCES AmountAmountAmountAmountEquity - developer$ 26,375,57431%Equity - TIF supported$ 5,100,0006%Mortgage$ 53,593,54563%Grants$ TBD0%TOTAL$85,069,119100%Budget has increased $1.3 M since AugustTIF contribution remains the same The CITYofEDINA13Staff Evaluation – Eligible TIF Costs•Follow Minnesota statutes regarding eligible expenses•Follow Edina policy regarding TIF reimbursement•TIF Note Not To Exceed $5.1 MDescription of Statutory Eligible ExpensesDescription of Statutory Eligible ExpensesDescription of Statutory Eligible ExpensesDescription of Statutory Eligible Expenses Estimated CostEstimated CostEstimated CostEstimated CostLand Acquisition $12,000,000Parking (structured) $12,100,000Site prep, including general utilities Included in demoAffordable housing not includedSite prep, storm water $350,000+Demolition and remediation $750,000Public plaza with streetscape and art $200,000+Other public infrastructure $150,000+City TIF advisors $75,000TOTAL = $25.6+ Million The CITYofEDINA14Key Terms of AgreementPrivate Redevelopment1.Assumes a 26-year Redevelopment TIF District2.Pledge up to $5.1 million TIF Note paid from incremental tax revenue over 15 years3.If eligible, pursue grants from DEED and Met. Council to reduce gapPublic Roadway Improvements4.City to prepare engineering documents for related public roadway improvements and plan for construction within 5-years The CITYofEDINA15Key Terms of Agreement•Earns 4.00% interest (to match debt)•Payable from no more than 70% of incremental taxes for first 15 yearsTIF Note•Issued after all conditions successfully delivered and documented•- financial risk stays with developer•Sized based on actual costs at completion•Not to exceed $5.1 million (or 6.1% of TDC)•Reimbursement resized at stabilization•Subject to “lookback” and “clawback” upon sale The CITYofEDINAKey Terms of Agreement16Public Benefits – Streetscapes•Permanent easements for public sidewalks and plaza•Public plaza with public art sculpture•Future easement for mass transit accessPublic Benefits – Parking and Future Roadway•Permanent easement for 29 parking stalls•- Reasonable rules to ensure these areas are properly used•Easement and dedication of approx. 10,500 sq ft land for future roadway or public use The CITYofEDINAKey Terms of Agreement•City retains first right to purchase if building is converted to condominium•Both parties agree to discuss – in good faith – opportunities to extend term past 21 years prior to terminationPublic Benefits –Affordable Housing•10% of total units priced to be affordable to families earning 50% Area Median Income (AMI)•21-year term of affordability•Units are scattered throughout building•Sizes include studio, 1-bed and 2-bed•All residents have same access to all amenities (including covered parking)17 The CITYofEDINA18Key Terms of AgrementPublic Benefits –Advancing Diversity and Equity Goals•Developer and Contractor shared Equal Opportunity employment polices•Contractor to make good faith efforts to include women, indigenous and people of color on the project as well as WBE and MBE in the subcontracting•- subject to availability•Contractor to report on total hours worked and contracts awarded by these groups at completionImage Source: Commercial Construction and Renovation The CITYofEDINA19Key Terms of AgreementPublic Benefits –Adjacent Roadway Improvements•Improvements for pedestrians, bicyclists and drivers•Benefit site, adjacent neighborhoods and general public •Contracted separately by City•Potentially include:•- Eden –Willson intersection•- Grange – 50thSt intersection•- 50thSt turn lanes and sidewalks•- Grange Rd sidewalks•- Eden Ave sidewalksFinal layout and extent of roadway work subject to further review The CITYofEDINA20SummaryRedevelopment Agreement prepared by City staff, Dorsey & Whitney and Ehlers Associates+ Consistent with August 2021 Term Sheet+ Consistent with applicable City policiesDeveloper is agreeable to the terms, conditions and limitationsStaff recommends that the Redevelopment Agreement be approved The CITYofEDINA21Questions / Discussion The CITY ofEDINA 4917 Eden Avenue Redevelopment Agreement for Tax Increment Financing Edina City Council November 3, 2021 www.EdinaMN.gov The CITY ofEDINA 2 Background -Current Conditions -2.0 acre site -Built 1973 -Restaurant with office and warehouse -Land value exceeds value of structure 4917 The CITY ofEDINA 3 Granted preliminary rezoninG approval JUly 2021 Background -Proposed Project parking easement Futureroad easement The CITY ofEDINA 4Photo Source: Minnesota Historic Society Background -Proposed Project Granted preliminary rezoninG approval JUly 2021 The CITY ofEDINA 5Photo Source: Minnesota Historic Society Granted preliminary rezoninG approval JUly 2021 Background -Proposed Project Future road easement Public parking easement The CITY ofEDINA 7Photo Source: Minnesota Historic Society Background-Potential Public Roadway Improvements •Eden/Willson Intersection •50th / Grange Intersection •Eden Ave •Grange Road •50th Street The CITY ofEDINA 8 Request for TIF Developer requested $5.1million over 15 years to make redevelopment project of this scale and quality financially viable. This request has been analyzed and evaluated. •A substantial budget gap has been confirmed. •Redevelopment Agreement has been prepared •Based on August 2021 Term Sheet •Staff recommends approval of Agreement gap The CITY ofEDINA 10 Staff Evaluation –Tax Base Growth Current conditions (2021) Estimate after redevelopment(2024) PercentChange Estimated Tax Capacity 38,495 887,000 +2,200% Estimated Market Value $3.01 M $54.8 to $60.3 M +1,800% Annual Property Taxes Paid $99,960 $739,092 to $813,668 +739% •This degree of growth would not happen if the site was remodeled or rebuilt as a simple commercial structure •Redevelopment projects of this scale and caliber deliver a tremendous boost to the tax base •Without TIF, the proposed project does not appear to be viable The CITY ofEDINA 11 Staff Evaluation –Public Benefits •High quality mixed-use development •Increase property tax base •Improve storm water conditions •Public sidewalks and streetscapes, including public art •Affordable housing (20 units for 21 years) •Public parking (29 stalls) •Land for future public use (roadway) •Enable adjacent public roadway improvements The CITY ofEDINA 12 Staff Evaluation –Sources and Uses USES Amount Percent Acquisition and Land Costs $ 12,000,000 14.1% Construction Hard Costs including:$ 63,607,999 74.8% Parking 12,188,680 Soil Correction & Remediation 750,000 Public Plaza with public art 200,000 Contingency 2,550,000 3.0% Soft Costs including:$ 12,011,120 14.1% Developer Fee $ 2,895,000 3.4% Financing Costs $ 4,290,980 5.0% TOTAL $85,069,119 SOURCES Amount Equity -developer $ 26,375,574 31% Equity -TIF supported $ 5,100,000 6% Mortgage $ 53,593,545 63% Grants $ TBD 0% TOTAL $85,069,119 100% Budget has increased $1.3 M since August TIF contribution remains the same The CITY ofEDINA 13 Staff Evaluation –Eligible TIF Costs •Follow Minnesota statutes regarding eligible expenses •Follow Edina policy regarding TIF reimbursement •TIF Note Not To Exceed $5.1 M Description of Statutory Eligible Expenses Estimated Cost Land Acquisition $12,000,000 Parking (structured)$12,100,000 Site prep, including general utilities Included in demo Affordable housing not included Site prep, storm water $350,000+ Demolition and remediation $750,000 Public plaza with streetscape and art $200,000+ Other public infrastructure $150,000+ City TIF advisors $75,000 TOTAL = $25.6+ Million The CITY ofEDINA 14 Key Terms of Agreement Private Redevelopment 1.Assumes a 26-year Redevelopment TIF District 2.Pledge up to $5.1 million TIF Note paid from incremental tax revenue over 15 years 3.If eligible, pursue grants from DEED and Met. Council to reduce gap Public Roadway Improvements 4.City to prepare engineering documents for related public roadway improvements and plan for construction within 5- years The CITY ofEDINA 15 Key Terms of Agreement •Earns 4.00% interest (to match debt) •Payable from no more than 70% of incremental taxes for first 15 years TIF Note •Issued after all conditions successfully delivered and documented •-financial risk stays with developer •Sized based on actual costs at completion •Not to exceed $5.1 million (or 6.1% of TDC) •Reimbursement resized at stabilization •Subject to “lookback” and “clawback” upon sale The CITY ofEDINAKey Terms of Agreement 16 Public Benefits –Streetscapes •Permanent easements for public sidewalks and plaza •Public plaza with public art sculpture •Future easement for mass transit access Public Benefits –Parking and Future Roadway •Permanent easement for 29 parking stalls •-Reasonable rules to ensure these areas are properly used •Easement and dedication of approx. 10,500 sq ft land for future roadway or public use The CITY ofEDINAKey Terms of Agreement •City retains first right to purchase if building is converted to condominium •Both parties agree to discuss –in good faith –opportunities to extend term past 21 years prior to termination Public Benefits –Affordable Housing •10% of total units priced to be affordable to families earning 50% Area Median Income (AMI) •21-year term of affordability •Units are scattered throughout building •Sizes include studio, 1-bed and 2-bed •All residents have same access to all amenities (including covered parking) 17 The CITY ofEDINA 18 Key Terms of Agrement Public Benefits –Advancing Diversity and Equity Goals •Developer and Contractor shared Equal Opportunity employment polices •Contractor to make good faith efforts to include women, indigenous and people of color on the project as well as WBE and MBE in the subcontracting •-subject to availability •Contractor to report on total hours worked and contracts awarded by these groups at completion Image Source: Commercial Construction and Renovation The CITY ofEDINA 19 Key Terms of Agreement Public Benefits –Adjacent Roadway Improvements •Improvements for pedestrians, bicyclists and drivers •Benefit site, adjacent neighborhoods and general public •Contracted separately by City •Potentially include: •-Eden –Willson intersection •-Grange –50th St intersection •-50th St turn lanes and sidewalks •-Grange Rd sidewalks •-Eden Ave sidewalks Final layout and extent of roadway work subject to further review The CITY ofEDINA 20 Summary Redevelopment Agreement prepared by City staff, Dorsey & Whitney and Ehlers Associates + Consistent with August 2021 Term Sheet + Consistent with applicable City policies Developer is agreeable to the terms, conditions and limitations Staff recommends that the Redevelopment Agreement be approved The CITY ofEDINA 21 Questions / Discussion Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-71: Right-of-Way Easement Vacation at 4904 Bywood West Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2021-71 to vacate the easement at 4904 Bywood West. INTRODUCTION: No comments were received as part of the public hearing that closed at noon on September 13, 2021. The easement area is clear of all public and private utilities. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2021-71 Public Hearing Notice - Bywood Application Staff Presentation RESOLUTION NO. 2021-71 VACATING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 4904 BYWOOD WEST WHEREAS, an application was received on July 14, 2021 from Jeff Engelsma of 4904 Bywood West, dedicated in the plat of Gilwood Addition, requesting that the utility easement be vacated; and WHEREAS, two weeks published and posted notice was given and the hearing was held on September 9, 2021, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the utility easement is not needed for public purposes; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota: 1. That the following described utility easement is hereby vacated: The Southwesterly 10 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, GILWOOD ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except the Northwesterly 10 feet and the Southeasterly 10 feet thereof. 2. The vacation shall not affect the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling the electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, water pipes, mains and hydrants thereon or thereunder, if any, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such way or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto. 3. That the Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute all documents necessary, in the opinion of the City Attorney, to affect the transfer of this property. Adopted this 3rd day of November, 2021. Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 3, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _____ day of __________, 2021. _______________________________ City Clerk Public Hearing Notice City Council, 7 p.m. Thursday, September 9, 2021 July 30, 2021 English: This and other public hearing notices can be viewed online at EdinaMN.gov/PublicNotices. Español: Este y otros avisos de audiencia pública se pueden ver en línea en EdinaMN.gov/PublicNotices. Soomaali: Tan iyo ogeysiisyo kale oo dhagaysi dadweyne ayaa lagu daawan karaa onlayn ahaan EdinaMN.gov/PublicNotices. Vacation of Public Right-of-Way Easement at 4904 Bywood West LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT: The Southwesterly 10 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, GILWOOD ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except the Northwesterly 10 feet and the Southeasterly 10 feet thereof. REQUEST: Utility easement vacation at 4904 Bywood West. See attached lot survey. HOW TO PARTICIPATE: Public hearing input can be provided in a variety of ways to the Planning Commission and City Council. Options 1 & 2 are available now: 1) Complete the Public Hearing Comment Form online at: www.bettertogetheredina.org/4904-bywood 2) Leave a voicemail with your feedback. (952-826-0377) Options 3 & 4 are available the night of the public hearing meetings: 3) Watch the meeting and call in to provide testimony. a. Edina TV (Comcast Channels 813 or 16) b. Facebook.com/EdinaMN c. EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeetings  City Council: Call in to provide live testimony at the September 9th meeting, 1-800-374- 0221. The Conference ID 1788657 4) Attend the meetings to provide testimony, City Hall Council Chambers, 4801 W. 50th St. DEADLINES: The City Council is scheduled to make a decision at its Sep 21 meeting. Deadline for comments via voicemail or BetterTogetherEdina.org is Noon, Monday, September 13th. FURTHER INFORMATION: City of Edina Engineering, 7450 Metro Blvd, Edina, MN 55439, 952-826-0371 To view the proposed easement vacation, visit the Better Together Edina website for this specific project at: www.bettertogetheredina.org/4904-bywood City Of Edina, Minnesota DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION 4801 West 501h Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424-1394 Phone _ (952) 927-8861 TDD J (952) 826-0379 Fax _ (952) 826-0390 PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY VACATION APPLICATION Applicant Jeff Engelsma Print Name Address Telephone No. Fax No. I hereby petition the City Council of the City of Edina to vacate all of the following described public right of way pursuant to M.S. 412.851 and Edina Code Section 24-191: Li Street I I Alley x Utility Easement Drainage Easement I I Other Legal description of the area proposed to be vacated (Please note all legal descriptions shall be transmitted electronically In a Word documents to the City of Edina City Clerk: Dmangen @edinamn,gov): The Southwesterly 10 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, GILWOOD ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except the Northwesterly 10 feet and the Southeasterly 10 feet thereof. Does the area proposed to be vacated or any part thereof terminate at or abut upon any public water? I I Yes El No Please note if the area requested to be vacated terminates at or abuts upon any public water, no vacation shall be made unless written notice of the petition is served by certified mail upon the commissioner of natural resources by the City of Edina thirty days before any Council action. • Attach a copy of a scaled drawing showing in full detail the area proposed to be vacated. Include the vacation fee of $450.00 with your application. THE MINNESOTA DATA PRACTICES ACT requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Private data is available to you, but not to the public. We are requesting this data to determine your eligibility for a license from the City of Edina. Providing the data may disclose information that could cause your application to be denied. You are not legally required to provide the data, however, refusing to supply the data may cause your license to not be processed. Under MS 270,72, the City of Edina Is required to provide the Minnesota Department of Revenue your MN Tax ID Number and Social Security Number. The Department of Revenue may supply information to the Internal Revenue Service. In addition, this data can be shared by Edina City Staff, Department of Public Safety, Hennepin County Auditor, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, Hennepin County Warrant Office, Ramsey County Warrant Office and other persons or entities deemed necessary for verification of Information submitted in the application. Your signature on this application indicates you understand these rights. request that my residence address and telephone number be considered private data. My alternative address and telephone number are as follows: Address InOl 37et., oof) 7"" Telephone Number Date Initiated 7`'ig-202/ Signature 04/21/2014 Accoun t No. 1001.4391 4904 Bywood West PART OF UTILITY EASEMENT TO BE VACATED: The Southwesterly 10 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, GILWOOD ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except the Northwesterly 10 feet and the Southeasterly 10 feet thereof. The CITYofEDINAVacation of Easements4904 BywoodWestResolution 2021-71Public HearingSeptember 9, 2021 The CITYofEDINAExisting Easementswww.EdinaMN.gov2 The CITYofEDINAVacated AreaCity: No recommendation yet, discussions with private utilitiesPrivate Utilities: Discussions occurringwww.EdinaMN.gov3 The CITYofEDINARecommendationMotion to close the public hearing at noon, Monday, September 13,and to continue action on the item to the September 21 City Council meeting. www.EdinaMN.gov4 Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Scott H. Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Confirm Appointment of Mr. David Kendall of the Campbell Knutson Law Firm as City Attorney Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Confirm the appointment of Mr. David Kendall of the Campbell Knutson law firm to the position of City Attorney and approve legal services agreement. INTRODUCTION: The current civil City Attorney appointment and contract with the Campbell-Knutson law firm expired on Dec. 31, 2020. The City of Edina is a Statutory Plan B City under Minnesota law with a council-manager plan of government. Minnesota Statutes § 412.651 Subd. 3 states that the city manager shall appoint all officers and employees of the City including the attorney, but the appointment and removal of the attorney shall be subject to the approval of the council. The attorney shall serve at the pleasure of the city manager and may be removed by the manager, subject to the approval of the council. The city manager shall exercise control over all departments and divisions of the City, including assigning work to the attorney. Minnesota Statutes § 412.651 Subd. 4. Pursuant to that statutory authority, staff conducted a competitive Request for Proposals (RFP) process to assess the level of interest in the metropolitan area legal community in serving Edina as its civil attorney. In response to the RFP, the City received proposals from the following four law firms: Kennedy & Graven; Hoff-Berry; Eckberg & Lammers; and Campbell-Knutson. A staff interview team interviewed the four firms on Sept. 2, 2021. T he interview team was composed of staff members who engage regularly with the city attorney: Bill Neuendorf, Chad Millner, Cary Teague, Stephanie Hawkinson, Lisa Schaefer, Risi Karim and me. Following the interviews the team debriefed. The consensus selection of the interview team was Campbell- Knutson. I agreed and accepted that consensus. I discussed a new three-year agreement with Campbell Knutson, which is attached. It includes a 3% increase in the regularly hourly fee at the start of Year Two. Otherwise, the contract is materially the same as our current agreement. I recommend the City Council affirm my selection of David Kendall as the City’s civil City Attorney and approve the contract for services with the Campbell Knutson law firm setting Year One of the contract as 2022. ATTACHMENTS: Description City Attorney Agreement 218753v2 1 AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDINA AND CAMPBELL KNUTSON, Professional Association THIS AGREEMENT is by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and CAMPBELL KNUTSON, Professional Association, a Minnesota corporation ("Attorney"). NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. SERVICES AND RELATIONSHIP. A. The Attorney shall furnish and perform general civil municipal and code enforcement legal services for the City. B. The Attorney shall be engaged as an independent contractor and not as a City employee. The Attorney is free to contract with other entities. 2. TERM. A. The City of Edina is a Statutory Plan B City under Minnesota law with a council-manager plan of government. Minnesota Statutes § 412.651 Subd. 3 states that the city manager shall appoint all officers and employees of the City including the attorney, but the appointment and removal of the attorney shall be subject to the approval of the council. The attorney shall serve at the pleasure of the city manager and may be removed by the manager, subject to the approval of the council. The city manager shall exercise control over all departments and divisions of the City, including assigning work to the attorney. Minnesota Statutes § 412.651 Subd. 4. 218753v2 2 B. The Attorney may terminate this Agreement at any time, provided that the Attorney shall give the City thirty (30) days written notice before the termination becomes effective. 3. PAYMENT. The Attorney will bill the City monthly. Payments for legal services provided the City shall be made in the manner provided by law. The City will normally pay for services within thirty (30) days of receipt of a statement for services rendered. Fees and costs will be charged as set forth in the attached Fee Schedule. The Fee Schedule may be amended from time to time by agreement of the City and Attorney. 4. INSURANCE. The Attorney will purchase and maintain sufficient insurance to protect Attorney against claims for legal malpractice. 5. ANNUAL REVIEW. The Attorney's performance may be reviewed annually or more often as deemed appropriate by the City Manager or City Council. 6. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. B. Assignment. The Attorney may not assign or refer any of the legal services to be performed hereunder without the consent of the Edina City Council. C. Effective Date. This Agreement shall be effective January 1, 2022 and shall continue for three years, at which time it may be extended at the pleasure of the parties. This Agreement shall not be modified or amended without the approval in writing of the parties. 218753v2 3 Dated: ___________________, 20___ Dated: ___________________, 20___ CITY OF EDINA CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association By: ________________________________ By: _______________________________ James Hovland, Mayor David S. Kendall And: _______________________________ Scott Neal, City Manager 218753v2 4 FEE SCHEDULE A. General Civil Municipal: a. Year One: All Attorneys $165.00 per hour; Law Clerks and Legal Assistants $90.00 per hour. b. Year Two: All Attorneys $170.00 per hour; Law Clerks and Legal Assistants $90.00 per hour. c. Year Three: All Attorneys $170.00 per hour; Law Clerks and Legal Assistants $90.00 per hour. B. Pass-through Legal Services: All Attorneys $275.00 per hour and paralegal/legal assistants currently ranging from $90.00 to $150.00 per hour, for legal services that are passed through to third parties according to the City policies, or financed as part of a specific project or fund, or which constitute active representation of the City in agency or legislative proceedings, grievance or interest arbitrations, real estate acquisitions and condemnations, pre-litigation, litigation and appellate matters. C. Meetings: Attorney attendance at City Council and all other meetings will be billed at the actual hourly rates listed in Paragraph A above. D. Minimum Billing Increment: The minimum billing increment for all services is two-tenths (2/10) of an hour. E. Cost: Out-of-pocket costs without mark-up. Costs include:  Westlaw and Lexis/Nexis legal research  recording fees and tract index search fees  postage of 50¢ or more  photocopies at 20¢ per copy  color copies at 40¢ per copy  litigation (court filing fees, expert witnesses, acquisitions, subpoenas, service of process, etc.) Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Scott H. Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Confirm Appointment of Mr. Patrick Leach of Leach Law Office as City Prosecuting Attorney Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Confirm appointment of Mr. P atrick Leach of Leach Law Office as City Prosecuting Attorney and approve prosecution contract. INTRODUCTION: The current prosecuting City Attorney is Mr. Patrick Leach of the Leach Law Office. The current contract with Mr. Leach expires on Dec. 31, 2021. The City of Edina is a Statutory Plan B City under Minnesota law with a council-manager plan of government. Minnesota Statutes § 412.651 Subd. 3 states that the city manager shall appoint all officers and employees of the City including the attorney, but the appointment and removal of the attorney shall be subject to the approval of the council. The attorney shall serve at the pleasure of the city manager and may be removed by the manager, subject to the approval of the council. The city manager shall exercise control over all departments and divisions of the City, including assigning work to the attorney. Minnesota Statutes § 412.651 Subd. 4. Historically, the City’s prosecuting attorney contract has operated on a monthly retainer basis. The attached agreement continues that business relationship. T here is not material difference between the enclosed agreement and previous agreements. The proposed monthly retainer will increase by 2% each year of the three-year agreement. That level of fee increase is acceptable to me and within the City’s ability to pay. City staff did not conduct a formal Request for Proposal (RFP) for this city attorney contract. Staff in the P olice Department are pleased with Mr. Leach’s performance. Mr. Leach has a good reputation with the judicial leaders of the District Court. Those two factors, plus the arrival of the new Chief of P olice this year, led me to conclude that we would not formally review the contract this year. We will conduct an RFP, however, at the end of this three-year contract. I recommend the City Council affirm the appointment of Mr. Patrick Leach as the P rosecuting City Attorney and approve the enclosed contract with the Leach Law Office. ATTACHMENTS: Description Prosecution Contract Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: IX.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Scott H. Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2021-106: Affirming and Authorizing the Submission of a Request for State Bonding Bill Funding Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2021-106 affirming and authorizing the submission of a request for State bonding bill funding. INTRODUCTION: The City is actively developing a project called the Fire Station #2 Project to replace and expand the current Fire Station #2 in the southeast quadrant of the City. T he estimated cost of the project is $20,000,000. State Sen. Melisa Franzen and State Rep. Heather Edelson have recommended the City seek funding for this project through the State’s 2022 State Capital Investment and Bonding Bill. Adoption of Resolution No. 2021-106 will formally submit a request for funding assistance for Fire Station #2 to the state government’s bonding bill process. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution 2021-106: Request for State Bonding Bill Funding RESOLUTION NO. 2021-106 AFFIRMING AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF A REQUEST FOR STATE BONDING BILL FUNDING WHEREAS, the City of Edina operates a municipal Fire Department; and, WHEREAS, the Edina Fire Department provide an array of emergency services such as fire suppression, Advanced Life Support (ALS) ambulance, community health and emergency management; and, WHEREAS, the effective service area for these services regularly extends beyond the corporate limits of the City of Edina; and, WHEREAS, a substantial investment in new capital facilities, improvements and expansion is required at Fire Station #2 in order for it to meet service demand expectations and contemporary operating standards; and, WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota’s capital funding bonding bill process is a reasonable alternative revenue source to local property taxes to financially support the necessary improvements and expansion for Fire Station #2. NOW, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the City Council requests the State of Minnesota include funding for the Fire Station #2 Project in the 2022 State Capital Investment and Bonding Bill; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the City Council requests the City Manager take the necessary steps to submit said proposal to the state for consideration in the bonding bill process. Dated: November 3, 2021 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 3, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _______ day of ___________________, 2021. City Clerk Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: X.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Grace Hancock, Sustainability Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Energy & Environment Commission, September 9, 2021 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None; information only. INTRODUCTION: Receive the attached minutes of the Energy and Environment Commission for September 9, 2021. ATTACHMENTS: Description 2021-09-09 EEC Minutes Agenda Energy and Environment Commission City Of Edina, Minnesota Public Works - Multi-purpose Room This meeting will be held in person. Thursday, September 9, 2021 7:00 PM I.Call To Order Chair Martinez called the meeting to order at 7:01 PM Chair Martinez welcomed new student commissioners Suryash Rawat and Ava Shumway II.Roll Call Answering roll call were Chair Martinez, Commissioners Horan, Haugen, Lanzas, Lukens, Tessman, Student Commissioners Rawat and Shumway Absent: Commissioners Ratan and Hovanec. Late: Commissioner Dakane arrived at 7:25pm III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda Meeting Agenda was approved Motion by John Haugen to Approve Meeting Agenda. Seconded by Cory Lukens. Motion Carried. IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes Meeting Minutes were approved Motion by Michelle Horan to Motion. Seconded by Cory Lukens. Motion Carried. A.Minutes: Energy and Environment Commission August 12, 2021 V.Community Comment Community comment was received from Paul Rosland with Suburban Waste Services, who introduced themselves and offered their services as a resource to the EEC. Motion to close community comment was approved. Motion by John Haugen to Motion. Seconded by Hilda Martinez Salgado. Motion Carried. During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VI.Reports/Recommendations A.2021 WP Initiative #1: Climate Action Plan Chair Martinez provided an update on the Climate Action Plan B.2021 WP Initiative #2: To-Go Packaging Commissioner Horan provided an update on the to-go packaging ordinance. C.2021 WP Initiative #3: EEC Event Tabling Commissioner Lanzas provided an update on the Event Tabling. D.2021 WP Initiative #5: Green Business Recognition Program Commissioner Horan provided an update on the Green Business Recognition Program. E.2021 WP Initiative #7: Review and Comment on ETC reports Commissioner Haugen introduced the draft organized trash collection report from the Edina Transportation Commission for EEC Comment EEC comments include: • The state statute regarding requirement to keep number of haulers should be researched to figure out parameters, and make sure there is a proper system in place for bids if hauler shares are to be kept? We want to reduce emissions, but also keep cost down for residents. • The final report should clarify and define meaning of organized trash collection. • what does transition period look like for customers in Edina who must change their hauler? • if they’re not getting choice for vendors, customer service cannot drop and residents need to save money. • Could city elect to have fewer licensed haulers than six? • how does price reduction work for residents? Costs should be kept down for residents. • Why can’t we have one vendor for trash like recycling and organics? • What can City do to ensure quality of service doesn’t diminish if residents are unhappy with new vendor? • Quality of Life survey respondents show majority support for this, higher level than before. EEC moved to support this report. All members in attendance voted in favor, with the Commission’s comments considered for the final report. Motion by Bayardo Lanzas to Motion. Seconded by Michelle Horan. Motion Carried. F.2022 Workplan Development Discussion Commissioners discussed 2022 work plan draft. EEC approved work plan to be advanced to City Council for 10/5 discussion. VII.Chair And Member Comments Commissioner Dakane led a moment of silence in honor of Iklas Abdullahi Ahmed's life. VIII.Staff Comments Staff informed Commissioners of new MN Green Corps member starting service with Edina Sustainability Division on September 20, 2021 for 11 months. IX.Adjournment Motion by John Haugen to Adjourn the Meeting at 9:15pm.. Seconded by Bayardo Lanzas. Motion Carried. T he City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: XII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: From: Item Activity: Subject:City Hall Public Meeting Room Policy CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: INTRODUCTION: Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: XIII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: From: Item Activity: Subject:Council Prep, Nov. 3, 2021 CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Council Prep, Nov. 3, 2021 1 Sharon Allison From:Scott H. Neal Sent:Wednesday, November 3, 2021 2:35 PM To:James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Ron Anderson; James Pierce; Carolyn Jackson Cc:Lisa Schaefer; Sharon Allison Subject:Council Meeting Prep for November 3. 2021 Good Afternoon Everyone – Work Session Just a reminder that we will do this evening’s Work Session in the City Council Chambers due to the anticipated number of participants in the meeting. The Council Chambers provides more room to spread out and be safe from a COVID-19 perspective. I will introduce the subject and MJ Lamon will deliver the bulk of the content. Council Meeting A few of you have suggested that we remove Item C (Final Site Plan and Rezoning for the Perkins redevelopment project) from the Consent agenda. We can do that tonight. Our regular process would be to consider the item immediately following the approval of the Consent Agenda. I suggest that you consider the item following the Chad Millner’s East Grandview Transportation Study presentation in Special Recognitions and Presentations or to place it back int the Reports & Recommendations section as item A, which would be immediately prior to the two TIF items for the development. It is also important for you to know that the City has sufficient time on the regulatory timeline to allow you to table this item tonight to the November 16 Council meeting. You would need to act on it at the Nov 16 Council meeting. That’s all that I have for you right now. See you tonight. Scott Scott H. Neal, City Manager 952-826-0401 | Fax 952-826-0390 sneal@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Follow me on Twitter. Date: November 3, 2021 Agenda Item #: XIV. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Sharon Allison, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Calendar of City Council Meetings and Events Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None; information only. INTRODUCTION: Date Time Meeting/Event Location Tues, Nov 2 Edina School District General Election Wed, Nov 3 5:30 p.m.Board and Commission Annual Work Plan Community Room 7:00 p.m.City Council Regular Meeting Council Chambers Thurs, Nov 11 Veterans Day – City Hall closed Tues, Nov 16 5:30 p.m.2022-2023 Budget / Human Services Task Force Community Room 7:00 p.m.City Council Regular Meeting Council Chambers Thurs, Nov 18 7:30 a.m.Housing and Redevelopment Authority Council Chambers Thur-Fri, Nov 25-26 Thanksgiving Holiday – City Hall closed