HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-09-2021 PacketAg enda
Heritage Preservation Commission
City Of E dina, Minnesota
Multi Pur pose R oom -Public Works
Tuesday, November 9, 2021
7:00 PM
I.Ca ll To Ord er
II.Roll Ca ll
III.Approva l Of Meeting Agenda
IV.Approva l Of Meeting Min u tes
A.Octob er 12, 2021 Heritage Preservation Com m ission Min u tes
V.Com m u n ity Com m ent
During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues
or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the
number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. G enerally speaking, items
that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment.
Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their
comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to sta% for
consideration at a future meeting.
VI.Rep orts/Recom m en d ation s
A.Up d ate to E d ina Heritage La n d m ark Eligib le List
B.2021 CLG Report
VII.Cha ir An d Mem ber Com m ents
VIII.Sta- Com m ents
IX.Adjournm en t
The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public
process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampli1cation, an
interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861
72 hours in advance of the meeting.
Date: November 9, 2021 Agenda Item #: I V.A.
To:Heritage P reservation C ommission Item Type:
Minutes
F rom:Emily Bodeker, As s is tant C ity P lanner
Item Activity:
Subject:O c tober 12, 2021 Heritage P res ervation C ommis s ion
Minutes
Ac tion
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED:
Approve the O ctober 12, 2021 Heritage P reservation C ommission minutes.
I N TR O D U C TI O N:
AT TAC HME N T S:
Description
Minutes : October 12, 2021
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date:
Minutes
City of Edina, Minnesota
Heritage Preservation Commission
Tuesday, October 12, 2021
I. Call to Order
Chair Schilling called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m.
II. Roll Call
Answering roll call in-person were: Chair Schilling, Commissioners Lonnquist, Pollock, Cundy, Everson, Hassenstab and
student member Maheshwari.
Staff present: HPC Staff Liaison Emily Bodeker and Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel
III. Approval of Meeting Agenda
Motion made by Cundy seconded by Hassenstab to approve the meeting agenda as presented. All voted
aye. The motion carried.
IV. Approval of Meeting Minutes
Motion made by Pollock seconded by Lonnquist to approve the September 14, 2021, meeting minutes as
presented. All voted aye. The motion carried.
V. Community Comment: None.
VI. Reports/Recommendations
A. 4001 Sunnyside Road-Landmark Designation
Liaison Bodeker informed the Commission 4001 Sunnyside Road was one of the properties that the information
on landmark designation that the Commission worked on was sent to.
Motion Lonnquist seconded by Hassenstab to direct Preservation Consultant Vogel to begin/update the
landmark nomination study for 4001 Sunnyside Road. All voted aye. The motion carried.
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date:
B. COA: 4634 Edgebrook Place
Staff introduced the final plans for a COA for a new home at 4634 Edgebrook Place. Staff explained there were
no changes made to the initial plans submitted and final plans presented. The HPC asked the applicant if the
property owners would be amenable to an archeology survey or phase I shovel test prior to construction. The
applicant noted he would speak to the property owner and would contact staff if they were open to the shovel
test.
Motion made by Cundy seconded by Everson to approve the COA as presented based on the findings and
with the conditions listed in the staff report. All voted aye. The motion carried.
C. Update to Edina Heritage Landmark Eligible List
Motion Lonnquist seconded by Hassenstab to table this item to the November 9th HPC meeting so staff
can work with the Commission on correcting/editing some of the addresses on the Eligible list. All voted
aye. The motion carried.
The HPC requested staff work with IT and the GIS Specialist to update the Historic Property map on the City’s
website.
VII. Chair and Member Comments
Chair Schilling informed the Commission that she presented the proposed 2022 work plan to City Council. Staff
informed the commission she should have an update on the work plan/questions asked by Council at the
November meeting. Staff will present proposed work plans to City Council on November 3rd.
VIII. Staff Comments: None.
IX. Adjournment
Motion made by Pollock seconded by Lonnquist to adjourn the meeting at 7:45 pm. All voted aye. The
motion carried.
Respectfully submitted,
Emily Bodeker
Date: November 9, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.A.
To:Heritage P reservation C ommission Item Type:
R eport and R ecommendation
F rom:Emily Bodeker, As s is tant C ity P lanner
Item Activity:
Subject:Update to Edina Heritage Landmark Eligible Lis t Ac tion
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED:
Approve the updated 2021 Edina H eritage L andmark eligible list.
I N TR O D U C TI O N:
C onsultant Vogel field houses and removed addresses that no longer qualify as heritage preservation resources
due to compromised historic integrity caused by recent alterations.
T he H P C should review the attached list of landmark eligible properties. I t is important to periodically review and
revise the inventory of the heritage resources considered worthy of preservation.
AT TAC HME N T S:
Description
Updated Heritage Landmark Eligible List
1
EDINA HERITAGE LANDMARK ELIGIBLE LIST
Revised November 1, 2021
The properties listed below have been determined eligible for consideration as Edina Heritage Landmarks
by the Heritage Preservation Commission. For a property to qualify as landmark eligible, it must meet at
least one of the heritage landmark eligibility criteria by being associated with an important historic
context and retaining historic integrity of those physical characteristics necessary to convey its historic
significance. Evaluations have been based on information obtained through physical examination and
documentary research (i.e., survey). Inclusion in the heritage resources inventory does not automatically
qualify a property for landmark nomination—some of the survey data are incomplete or out of date, and
the registration requirements for some property types sometimes change as the city-wide heritage
resources survey proceeds. Several of the properties included in earlier lists have been eliminated
because they no longer meet established requirements for historic significance and integrity.
The list is an abstract of information contained in the city’s heritage resources inventory files, which
consists of reports, inventory forms, research notes, maps, photographs and other survey data compiled
since the city’s heritage preservation program was established in the 1970s. It is organized by historic
context and individual properties are listed by street address in alphanumeric order. This updated list
does not include the 11 heritage preservation resources previously designated Edina Heritage Landmarks
by the Edina City Council.
Agriculture and Rural Life
6128 Brookside Avenue – Gilbert and Sarah Sly House (historic name)
Rare surviving example of late-19th century Edina farmhouse architecture associated with agriculture and
rural development; built and occupied by the Sly family ca. 1866-1881 and later adapted for use as a rural
nonfarm dwelling. HPB finding of landmark eligibility (2007) based on the “Historic Buildings of Edina”
survey by Jeffrey Hess (1979). 2007 Heritage Award recipient.
Suburbanization
4520 44th Street – Claude D. Kimball House (historic name)
Notable example of the Tudor Revival style architecture associated with the broad pattern of early 20th
century suburban development in Edina; built in 1914 and believed to be one of the first Tudor style
homes built in Edina. HPB finding of landmark eligibility (2014) based on the preservation planning
consultant’s recommendation.
4439 50th Street – St. Stephen the Martyr Episcopal Church (historic name)
The stone church on Minnehaha Creek is a notable example of religious architecture associated with the
broad pattern of suburban development in Edina; built in 1938, the original construction shows the
influence of the Gothic Revival style and is considered an important work by architect Louis B. Bersback
of the firm of Cram and Ferguson, Concord, MA. HPB finding of landmark eligibility based on the
“Historic Buildings of Edina” survey by Jeffrey Hess (1979).
Morningside
4410 Curve Avenue – Nels Nissen and Johanna Leerskov House (historic name)
Notable example of the vernacular American Foursquare house type associated with early residential
development in the Morningside neighborhood; built in 1910, the two-story house shows influence of the
Arts and Crafts Movement and exhibits Colonial Revival and Craftsman style detailing. The house is also
2
significant for its association with Nels Leerskov (b. 1864), who was a prominent home builder in
Morningside, the first neighborhood resident elected to Edina village council, and one of the prime
movers behind the incorporation of Morningside village in 1920. HPB finding of landmark eligibility
(2010) based on the “Historic Buildings of Edina” survey by Jeffrey Hess (1979).
4311 Eton Place – Oliver and Iva Skone House (historic name)
Notable example of the Mission Revival style associated with early residential development in the
Morningside neighborhood; built ca. 1913. Oliver Skone was a Swedish immigrant who settled in
Minneapolis ca. 1890, where he was employed as a printer and newspaper publisher; he and his wife
moved to Morningside in 1905 and became real estate developers. HPB finding of landmark eligibility
(2012) based on the “Historic Buildings of Edina” survey by Jeffrey Hess (1979).
4300 France Avenue – Johnson House (owner)
Notable example of vernacular residential architecture, illustrating the influence of the cottage and
bungalow small house forms; built in 1905 or 1906, it is believed to be one of the oldest homes on France
Avenue. HPB finding of landmark eligibility (2014) based on the preservation planning consultant’s
recommendation.
4384-4390 France Avenue – Odd Fellows Hall/Golden Lodge No 167 (historic name)
Rare surviving example of the two-story commercial block property type associated with the streetcar
system and early development in the 44th & France area; built in 1916, the two-story building housed
various stores and offices on the first floor, with the lodge hall on the upper floor. HPB finding of
landmark eligibility based on the results of the “Westgate Survey” (2012).
4400-4412 France Avenue – Griffin Drug Building (historic name)
Rare surviving example of a commercial building associated with the streetcar system and early
development in the 44th & France area; built in 1920 and currently occupied by Bruegger’s Bagels. HPB
finding of landmark eligibility based on the results of the “Westgate Survey” (2012).
4247 Grimes Avenue – Bauer House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular American Foursquare property type associated with early residential
development in the Morningside neighborhood; the two-story residence was built in 1914 and is
considered significant for its architectural character and association with the broad pattern of
neighborhood development. HPB finding of landmark eligibility (2014) based on a survey conducted by
the preservation planning consultant.
4201 Morningside Road – Edina-Morningside Community Church (historic name)
Notable example of religious architecture associated with the broad pattern of residential development in
the Morningside neighborhood; the original church building was constructed in 1922 and shows the
influence of the Late Gothic Revival style; it is also considered an important work by Minneapolis
architect Harry Wild Jones (1859-1935). The HPB based its finding of landmark eligibility on the
“Historic Buildings of Edina” survey by Jeffrey Hess (1979). A landmark nomination study is
forthcoming in 2021.
4246 Scott Terrace – Nels and Etta Erickson House (historic name)
Notable example of early 20th century residential architecture; built in 1911, the two-story residence
shows the influence of the Mission Revival style. It may also be significant for its association with Nels
Erickson (b. 1863), a Swedish immigrant and proprietor of Medium Hollow Brick Tile Co., Minneapolis.
HPB finding of significance (2010) based on the “Historic Buildings of Edina” survey by Jeffrey Hess
(1979).
3
3910-3912 Sunnyside Road – Convention Grill (historic name)
One-story commercial building with Modern style detailing associated with mid-20th century
development in the 44th & France/Westgate business district; built ca. 1940, the building is distinguished
by its Art Deco style detailing but is primarily significant for its association with commercial
development in the 44th & France neighborhood. HPB finding of landmark eligibility based on the results
of the “Westgate Survey” (2012).
Southdale
66th Street at France Avenue – Southdale Shopping Center (historic name)
Historic site consisting of an enclosed retail mall and open space; built in 1954-56. The property is
associated with important events in Edina history and comprises a specific built environment shaped by
historical processes of land use and economic development; although the property js often cited as the
“oldest shipping mall in the United States” and an important work by urban planner Victor Gruen (1903-
1980), the shopping center building is not considered a preservation resource in its own right. HPB
finding of landmark eligibility (2011) based on research conducted by the preservation planning
consultant.
6909 Hillcrest Lane – Sara Moore House (historic name)
A notable, well preserved example of mid-20th century residential architecture in the Ranch style; built in
1955-56 for Sara W. Moore (1911-1992), a Minneapolis schoolteacher. One of the first homes built in
the Southdale First Addition, it was designed by the prominent Minneapolis architect R. N. Thorshov
(one of the original members of the Minneapolis Heritage Preservation Commission). HPC finding of
landmark eligibility (2014) based on information provided by HPC member Robert Moore; a draft
landmark nomination study was also prepared by the preservation planning consultant (2015).
Country Clubs and Parks
6200 Interlachen Boulevard – Interlachen Country Club Golf Course (historic name)
The subject property encompasses an extensive constructed landscape that represents an outstanding
example of early 20th century golf course design; built in 1911 and enlarged in 1919-21. The original 18-
hole, 612 yard course on “Edina Boulevard” (later renamed Interlachen Boulevard) was designed by
Willie Watson of Pasadena, California, one of the pioneers of American golf course design; the1919-21
expansion was designed by Donald J. Ross (1872-1948), another important designer of American golf
courses. The golf course was restored in 1986 in accordance with Ross’ original design. The Tudor
Revival style clubhouse designed by Minneapolis architect Cecil Bayless Chapman (1877-1918) is not
considered a preservation resource due to substantial alterations and additions, but contributes to historic
character of the golf club property. HPB finding of landmark eligibility (2008) based on the consultant
report “Phase I Survey for Interlachen Boulevard/Blake Road Trail” (2005).
Minnehaha Creek
Downstream from Hwy. 100 – Mill Pond Cascade (historic name)
Rare preserved example of a designed historic landscape associated with Federal relief construction along
Minnehaha Creek during the late 1930s. The reinforced concrete water control structure was designed and
built in 1934-35 by the Civil Works Administration (CWA) and the Works Progress Administration
(WPA); the fountain is no longer in use. HPB finding of landmark eligibility (2014) based on the
consultant report “Heritage Preservation Resources Minnehaha Creek” (2009)
Midcentury Modern Architecture and Landscapes
4
5501 Londonderry Road – Arthur Erickson House (historic name)
Notable example of mid-century modern domestic architecture; built in 1950. The Ranch style residence
was designed by Los Angeles architect Lloyd Wright (1890-1978) for Arthur Erickson (1910-1966),
president of the Erickson Petroleum Corp., one of seven brothers who founded what became the Holiday
Companies. Architect Wright was the son of Frank Lloyd Wright (1867-1959). HPB finding of
landmark eligibility (2014) was based on information obtained from the property’s owner.
6001 Pine Grove Road – Paul and Mary Carson House/“Maryhill” (historic name)
Notable example of mid-century modern domestic architecture; built in 1941. The house was designed by
Prairie School architect William Gray Purcell (1880-1965) of Minneapolis firm Purcell & Elmslie (1907-
1921) for Dr. Paul Carson (d. 2005), as wedding present for his wife, Mary F. Carson. The property is
currently protected under the terms of a conservation easement held by the Minnesota Land Trust. HPB
finding of landmark eligibility (2014) based on the results of the “Suburban Development in Edina Since
1935” historic context study (2013).
5117 Schaefer Road – Schaefer House and Stable (historic name)
Rare preserved example of a single-family dwelling and accessory building finished with native stone; the
house was built in 1936; the guest house (originally a stable) was built in 1932). HPB finding of landmark
eligibility (2014) was based on the results of the “Suburban Development in Edina Since 1935” historic
context study (2013).
7205 Shannon Drive – Bruce A. Abrahamson House (historic name)
Rare example of an architect-designed residence in the International style; designed and built in 1959 by
the original owner, Bruce A. Abrahamson. The property is considered architecturally significant because
of its association with Abrahamson (d. 2008), who is recognized as an important Minnesota architect.
HPB finding of landmark eligibility based on the results of a survey conducted by the preservation
planning consultant (2014).
5015 Wooddale Lane – Albert R. Blackbourne House (historic name)
Notable example of mid-century modern architecture showing the influence of the Colonial Revival style;
built in 1939 for Minneapolis businessman Albert R. Blackbourne (1893-1968). The property is
historically significant for its association with Boston architect Royal Barry Wills (1895-1962), a popular
home designer and architectural writer. The house was reportedly built from plans drawn by Wills for his
award-winning entry in the 1938 “Eight Houses for Modern Living” competition sponsored by Life
magazine and Architectural Forum. HPB finding of landmark eligibility based on the results of a survey
conducted by the preservation planning consultant (2012).
Morningside Bungalows
3920 44th Street – Weiss House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow property type; built in 1909. HPB finding of landmark
eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4006 44th Street – Carlson House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow property type; built in 1912. HPB finding of landmark
eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4012 44th Street – Pilegaard House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow (“California bungalow” variant); built in 1912/1925. HPB
finding of landmark eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
5
4016 44th Street – Sweetser House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow cottage property type; built in 1918. HPB finding of
landmark eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4018 44th Street – Tanaka House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow (“California Bungalow” variant); built in 1914. HPB finding
of landmark eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4020 44th Street – Abraham House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow property type; built in 1913. HPB finding of landmark
eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4116 44th Street – William and Lillian Riley/Simmons House (historic name)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow (“California Bungalow” variant); built in 1911. HPB finding
of landmark eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4206 44th Street – Gokemeuer House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow property type; built in 1919. HPB finding of landmark
eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4210 44th Street – Mantyh House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow property type; built in 1922. HPB finding of landmark
eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4230 Alden Drive – Shannon House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow (“California Bungalow” variant); built in 1910. HPB
finding of landmark eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010),
4238 Alden Drive – House
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow (hip-roofed variant) property type; built in 1920. HPB
finding of landmark eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4400 Curve Avenue – Anderson-Thang House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow property type; built in 1921. HPB finding of landmark
eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4401 Curve Avenue – Thompson House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow-cottage property type; built in 1924. HPB finding of
landmark eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4406 Curve Avenue – Canersky House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow property type; built in 1922. HPB finding of landmark
eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4219 Grimes Avenue – Cavenaugh-Lavercombe House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow-cottage (“Portico/Semi-Bungalow” variant) property type;
built in 1920. HPB finding of landmark eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS
(2010).
4243 Grimes Avenue – Otremba House (owner)
6
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow property type; built in 1921. HPB finding of landmark
eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4246 Grimes Avenue – Burke House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow property type; built in 1924. HPB finding of landmark
eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4307 Grimes Avenue – Bjerke House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow property type; built in 1923. HPB finding of landmark
eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4103 Morningside Road – Johnson House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow property type; built in 1913. HPB finding of landmark
eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4105 Morningside Road – Hansen House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow property type; built in 1920. HPB finding of landmark
eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4211 Morningside Road – Hayhoe House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow property type; built in 1902. May predate construction of
the streetcar line. HPB finding of landmark eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS
(2010).
4305 Morningside Road – Henry G. and Lois Onstad House (historic name)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow (“Airplane” variant) property type; built in 1920. HPB
finding of landmark eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4317 Morningside Road – Hobbs House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow-cottage property type; built in 1923. HPB finding of
landmark eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4400 Morningside Road (original address: 4248 Lynn) – Berman House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow property type; built in 1918. HPB finding of landmark
eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4223 Scott Terrace – Tyler House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow property type; built in 1923. HPB finding of landmark
eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4226 Scott Terrace -- Conroy House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow property type; built in 1925. HPB finding of landmark
eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010); needs to be re-evaluated (2021
consultant recommendation).
4233 Scott Terrace – Umlor House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow property type; built in 1924. HPB finding of landmark
eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010). This property was featured in the
2018 “Homes by Architects Tour” sponsored by the Minnesota AIA.
4234 Scott Terrace – Kennedy House (owner)
7
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow-cottage property type; built in 1919. HPB finding of
landmark eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4235 Scott Terrace – Malberg House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow-cottage property type; built in 1923. HPB finding of
landmark eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4237 Scott Terrace – Rohlf House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow-cottage property type; built in 1913. HPB finding of
landmark eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4241 Scott Terrace – J. T. Smith House (historic name)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow-cottage property type; built in 1923. HPB finding of
landmark eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4343 Scott Terrace – Anderson House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow property type; built in 1923. HPB finding of landmark
eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010); needs to be re-evaluated (2021
consultant recommendation).
4245 Scott Terrace – Beito House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow property type; built in 1922. HPB finding of landmark
eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4246 Scott Terrace – Balabuszko-Reay House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow property type; built in 1911. HPB finding of landmark
eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4000 Sunnyside Road – Myre House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow property type; built in 1911. HPB finding of landmark
eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4001 Sunnyside Road – Thompsen House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow property type; built in 1923. HPB finding of landmark
eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4008 Sunnyside Road – Lathrop House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow property type; built in 1915. HPB finding of landmark
eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4009 Sunnyside Road – Hughes-Pigeon House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow property type; built in 1918. HPB finding of landmark
eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4011 Sunnyside Road – Schmidt House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow property type; built in 1923. HPB finding of landmark
eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
4014 Sunnyside Road – Ellickson House (owner)
Notable example of the vernacular bungalow property type; built in 1922. HPB finding of landmark
eligibility (2012) based on the Morningside Bungalows MPS (2010).
Date: November 9, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.B.
To:Heritage P reservation C ommission Item Type:
R eport and R ecommendation
F rom:Emily Bodeker, As s is tant C ity P lanner
Item Activity:
Subject:2021 C LG R eport Ac tion
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED:
Approve the 2021 C ertified Local Government report.
I N TR O D U C TI O N:
AT TAC HME N T S:
Description
2021 CLG Report
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
ANNUAL CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT (CLG) REPORT
2021 FISCAL YEAR
The following is a summary of the projects, reviews and activities reported to the City Council and
Minnesota Preservation Office for the fiscal year 2021, (October 1, 2020 to September 30, 2021):
A. Local Designation of Preservation Sites:
1. See attached list of properties designated Edina Heritage Landmarks & those determined eligible
for designations as Exhibit “A”.
2. No new properties were determined eligible for Edina Heritage Landmark designation.
3. The city protected approximately 600 historically significant properties in fiscal 2020 and intends to
add more in 2022.
4. No significant heritage resources were destroyed or damaged as a result of any activity financed,
permitted, or otherwise supported by the City of Edina.
B. Review of Requests for a Certificate of Appropriateness in the historic Country Club
District:
1. 4634 Edgebrook Place
Request: New Home
Action: Withdrawn
2. 4630 Drexel Avenue
Request: Request to demolish/remove more than 50% surface area of exterior walls
Action: Denied 2/9/21
3. 4524 Drexel Avenue
Request: Construction of new detached garage and changes to front façade
Action: Approved 2/9/21
4. 4618 Arden Avenue
Request: Demolition of existing detached garage and construction of new detached garage
Action: Approved 2/9/21
5. 4518 Casco Avenue
Request: Demolition of existing detached garage and construction of new detached garage
Action: Approved 4/13/21
6. 4633 Arden Avenue
Request: Construction of a new detached garage and changes to front façade
Action: Approved 4/13/21
7. 4600 Browndale Avenue
Request: Changes to street facing façade
Action: Approved 4/13/21
8. 4628 Bruce Avenue
Request: Demolition of existing detached garage and construction of new detached garage
Action: Approved 4/13/21
9. 4634 Edgebrook Place
Request: New Home
Action: 1st Meeting 9/14/21
Approved 10/14/21
C. Heritage Preservation Commission Membership: 2021
See attached HPC Roster Exhibit “B”
D. National Register Nominations in 2021: None
Edina Heritage Preservation Commission
2021 CLG Report
2
The following properties in Edina are listed on the National Register of Historic Places:
1) George Baird House, 4400 West 50th Street
2) Jonathan Taylor Grimes House, 4200 West 44th Street
3) Grange Hall, 4918 Eden Avenue
4) Cahill School, 4924 Eden Avenue
5) Country Club District
6) Wooddale Bridge #90646, Wooddale Avenue over Minnehaha Creek
E. Local Inventories and Studies:
• Local Inventory: “Historic Building Survey of Edina, MN”,
Prepared by Setter, Leach & Lindstrom, July 1979, Historic Consultant, Jeffrey A. Hess
• “Historic Context Study”, Prepared by Robert C. Vogel and Associates, July 1999
• Recodified Section 850.20 “Edina Heritage Landmarks” of the Zoning Ordinance, 2003
• Comprehensive Heritage Preservation Plan, June 2006
• Heritage Preservation Element of City’s Comprehensive Plan submitted to Metropolitan
Council, 2009
• Morningside Bungalow Multiple Property Study, 2010
• Section 801 Heritage Preservation Board of City Code replaced with Section 1500/1504, 2011
• Thematic Study for Heritage Resources Associated with Edina Women, 2011
• Suburban Development in Edina Since 1935: A Historic Context Study, 2013
F. Assurances:
The HPC held monthly meetings as needed. The minutes of said meetings are recorded and kept at
City Hall, Edina, MN. The meetings were posted and open to the public. The assurance statement is
attached for Public Participation and Commission records.
G. Activities Accomplished in 2021 and Planned for 2022:
2021 Activities & Accomplishments:
1. The City of Edina contracted with Pathfinder CRM, LLC to provide heritage preservation advice
and services.
2. The 20201 Edina Heritage Award-Awarded during Preservation Month (May) was awarded to
the Suckow-Ziemer Residence at 5900 Olinger Boulevard. The home was recognized for its
architecture and details, which follow classic California Modern designs refined by Joseph Eichler
and others. The house was built in 1966 by the Lundgren Company. Previous owners restored
interior elements and in 2019 Suckow and Ziemer restored and refined the homes courtyard, a
distinguishing feature of mid-century modern homes.
3. Staff Liaison Bodeker and Commissioner Lonnquist attended sessions during the virtual 2021
MNSHPO conference.
4. A subgroup of Commissioners worked on resources to share with property owners giving
benefits and reasons to designate their properties and invited property owners to consider
designation. The HPC expects at least one property to be designated in 2022 due to the
outreach in 2021.
Proposed 2022 Work Plan Initiatives: (Attached as Exhibit “C”) to be considered by the Edina
City Council, December 2021.
Prepared by: Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner and Staff Liaison to the Heritage Preservation
Commission
Annual HPC Certified Local Government Assurances
February 1985; Revised May 2010
Name of HPC Edina Heritage Preservation Commission
Fiscal Year: 2021
1. I hereby certify that the Edina Heritage Preservation Commission has adhered to the
public participation provisions as stipulated under Section III.D of the "Minnesota
Certified Local Government Procedures Manual" issued by the Minnesota State Historic
Preservation Office.
2. I hereby certify that the Edina Heritage Preservation Commission has adhered to the
procedures of the State Archives Department of the Minnesota Historical Society,
regarding commission records (see the State Archives publication "Preserving and
Disposing of Government Records," pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 138.17).
_____________________________ _______________
Local Government Official Date
(This form may be used to certify compliance with requirement III.E.2.f of the Annual
Report required for all CLGs.)
EXHIBIT “B”
2021
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
Name Contact Information
Garrett Knudsen gknudsen@mac.com
Sarah Nymo sarah@nymoarchitecture.com
Annie Schilling annieschilling@msn.com
Jane Lonnquist janelonnquist@gmail.com
Darrah Widmoyer dcpurtell@hotmail.com
Bob Cundy bobcundy@gmail.com
Mark Hassenstab hassenstab@gmail.com
Rachel Pollock rachelhetlandpollock@gmail.com
Thomas Everson ever0150@umn.edu
Ashwin Maheshwari (S) mahesh52306@gmail.com
Sadie Roy (S) sadier22968@isd273.org
******************************************************************************
Staff Liaison: Emily Bodeker City of Edina (952-826-0462)
Assistant City Planner 4801 West 50th Street
ebodeker@edinamn.gov Edina, MN 55424
Consultant: Robert Vogel 319 So. Division Ave.
Pathway CRM P.O. Box 503
rcvogel@pathfindercrm.com Spring Grove, MN 55974
Template Updated 2021.06.08
Commission: Heritage Preservation Commission
2022 Annual Work Plan Proposal-DRAFT
Initiative # 1 Initiative Type ☐ Project ☒ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event
Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☒ 4 (Review & Decide)
Initiative Title
Review and decide on Certificates of Appropriateness (COA)
applications for changes to heritage landmark designated properties.
Deliverable
•COAs
Leads
All Commission
Target
Completion Date
Ongoing
Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Are there funds available for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this
initiative.
No additional funds required. Preservation Consultant funding comes from the Planning Department budget.
Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): How many hours of support by the staff liaison? Communications / marketing support?
Pre-Application meeting with staff liaison and application review time/report from Staff Liaison and Consultant Vogel. Staff time is dependent on how many
applications/preapplication meeting requests are received.
Liaison Comments: Processing COAs is an ongoing item.
City Manager Comments:
Progress Q1:
Progress Q2:
Progress Q3:
Progress Q4:
EXHIBIT "C"
Template Updated 2021.06.08
Initiative # 2 Initiative Type ☐ Project ☒ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event
Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☒ 4 (Review & Decide)
Initiative Title
Recruit nominees and award and promote the 2022 Heritage
Preservation Award during Preservation Month in May.
Deliverable
• Award the 2022 Heritage Award,
post nomination form and award
winner on Edina social media
Leads
Sarah Nymo
Target
Completion Date
May
Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Are there funds available for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this
initiative.
No additional funds required. Money for plaque comes from Planning budget.
Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): How many hours of support by the staff liaison? Communications / marketing support?
Public outreach: press release, social media posts, publish existing website form for nominations. Article on winner after aw ard is given.
Liaison Comments: The HPC will continue to award the 2022 Heritage Preservation Award during Preservation month.
City Manager Comments:
Progress Q1:
Progress Q2:
Progress Q3:
Progress Q4:
Template Updated 2021.06.08
Initiative # 3 Initiative Type ☐ Project ☒ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event
Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☒ 4 (Review & Decide)
Initiative Title
Based on owner interest, nominate eligible properties as Edina
Heritage Landmarks and add additional properties to the e ligible
property list.
Deliverable
• Add to eligible property list
• Designate additional Edina Heritage
Landmark properties
Leads
All commission
Target
Completion Date
Ongoing
Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Are there funds available for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this
initiative.
No additional funds required. Money for plaque comes from Planning budget.
Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): How many hours of support by the staff liaison? Communications / marketing support?
Public outreach: press release, social media posts, publish existing website form for nominations. Article on winner after aw ard is given.
Liaison Comments: This is an ongoing item for the HPC.
City Manager Comments:
Progress Q1:
Progress Q2:
Progress Q3:
Progress Q4:
Template Updated 2021.06.08
Initiative # 4 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event
Council Charge ☒ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide)
Initiative Title
Review plan of treatment document for each Landmark property.
Deliverable
• Highlight potential work plan items
related to plans of treatment for
future work plans
Leads
All Commission
Target
Completion Date
2022
Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Are there funds available for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this
initiative.
No additional funds required.
Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): How many hours of support by the staff liaison? Communications / marketing support?
None-review will take place during HPC meetings as time on agendas allows.
Liaison Comments: Any additional work that stems from review will be proposed on future work plans.
City Manager Comments:
Progress Q1:
Progress Q2:
Progress Q3:
Progress Q4:
Template Updated 2021.06.08
Initiative # 5 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event
Council Charge ☒ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide)
Initiative Title
Explore the development of a century home recognition program in
Edina based on programs in other cities; define the resources needed
to manage a potential program in the future.
Deliverable
• Information and a recommendation
for a future century home program
in Edina.
Leads
Jane Lonnquist
Mark Hassenstab
Target
Completion Date
2022
Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Are there funds available for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this
initiative.
No budget requested at this time. Initiative is to gather information/research on a potential program in Edina and informatio n on potential future costs if
implemented.
Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): How many hours of support by the staff liaison? Communications / marketing support?
Initiative and research to be completed by Commission leads
Liaison Comments: This item is for research, the creation of a program would be on a future work plan.
City Manager Comments:
Progress Q1:
Progress Q2:
Progress Q3:
Progress Q4:
Template Updated 2021.06.08
Initiative # 6 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☒ Event
Council Charge ☒ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide)
Initiative Title
Test archeological model created by the 2019 archeological study.
Archaeologist (GK) will coordinate with City Staff and Comm. Ed. to
conduct a “community archaeology project” in Edina that will include:
1) Phase I Reconnaissance — based on results of 2019 study and
additional analyses — in order to identify unrecorded cultural
resources on city-owned/managed properties and 2) Phase II
Evaluation (“digs” conducted to determine eligibility for listing on the
National Register) of any previously -unrecorded archaeological sites
identified in “1)”.
Deliverable
• Archeological model would be
tested secretary of the interior
qualified archeologist on HPC will
coordinate with City Staff and
Community Education to conduct
pro-bono test digs on designated
city properties.
• Promote tests and outcomes
through Edina social media and
other outlets. Use dig test results
to guide HPC recommendations for
additional archeological work in
future work plans.
Leads
Garrett Knudsen
Annie Schilling
Target
Completion Date
Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Are there funds available for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this
initiative.
There are not funds available for this project. Grant opportunities may be available if funding is required.
Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): How many hours of support by the staff liaison? Communications / marketing support?
The HPC will need permission and will need to work in coordination with the Parks Department on potential sites and potential programming. Social media
and communications support to promote the community event.
Liaison Comments: HPC will need to work with the Parks Department to see if this is a possibility on city owned property, logistics and sites/l ocation.
City Manager Comments:
Progress Q1:
Progress Q2:
Progress Q3:
Progress Q4:
Template Updated 2021.06.08
Initiative # 7 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event
Council Charge ☒ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide)
Initiative Title
Use education to promote preservation and avoid demolition by
neglect.
Deliverable
• Create and distribute educational
materials to property owners, real
estate agents, contractors and city
staff who interface with Heritage
Resource Properties/Districts.
Leads
Jane Lonnquist
Bob Cundy
Mark Hassenstab
Target
Completion Date
End of 2022
Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Are there funds available for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this
initiative.
There are not funds available for this project.
Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): How many hours of support by the staff liaison? Communications / marketing support?
Help creating education materials (graphic design) and social media/marketing support.
Liaison Comments: Staff is also working on potential escrow fee requirements on building permits for Historic Properties .
City Manager Comments:
Progress Q1:
Progress Q2:
Progress Q3:
Progress Q4:
Parking Lot: (These items have been considered by the BC, but not proposed as part of this year’s work plan. If the BC decides they would like to
work on them in the current year, it would need to be approved by Council.)