Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-05-19_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MAY 19, 1986 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL MINUTES OF HRA Meetings of March 31, April 3, 14, and 21, 1986,-approved as submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by I. AWARD OF BID - Edinborough Painting Contract ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL PROCLAMATION - Respect for Law Week RESOLUTIONS OF COMMENDATION - Edina High School Athletic Teams I. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass. Lot Divisions, Plats, Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required to pass. Final Plat Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3 /5.favorable rollcall vote of all members of the .Council required to pass. A. Preliminary Plat Approval 1. Dahle Replat of Warden Acres - Generally located south of Grove Street and west of Garden Avenue (Contd from 4- 21 -86) 2. Valley View Heights 3rd Addition - Generally located south of Valley View Road and east of Tracy Avenue B. Zoning Change 1. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -3 Planned Residential District - Robert Hansen - Generally located north of Crosstown Highway and east and north of Vernon Court II. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS III. AWARD OF BIDS A. Upgraded Radio Communications System B. Street Improvement Nos. BA -269, BA -270 and BA -271 C.. Plow and Wings D. Traffic Signs E. Millpond Weed Harvesting IV. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Approval of Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of 5/13/86 B. Park Board Recommendation - Braemar Sports Complex C. On -Sale Beer License - St. Louis Rib Company D. Wine Licensing Procedure Report E. I- 494.Corridor Study Report 1. Metropolitan Council Agreement 2. Alternate Selection 3. Land Use F. Approval of Sanitary Sewer Renovation - Arden /Bruce /50th Street G. Dearborn Addition /Blake Woods Addition - Approval of Construction of Utilities and Streets and Ordering-Bids to be Taken (100% petition) H. Heritage Preservation Board - Request for Leave I. Request Pertaining to Massage License Ordinance (Contd from 5/5/86) J. Set Hearing Date - Final Plan Approval - France Avenue (6/2/86) K. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council L. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items Agenda Edina City Council May 19, 1986 Page Two V. COMMUNICATIONS A. Request for Assessment of Connection Charge - Watermain No. 306 - 6709 Normandale Road VI. FINANCE A. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by for payment of the following claims as per Pre -List dated 5/19/86: General Fund $229,930.09, Art Center $8,030.87, Swimming Pool Fund $360.45, Golf Course Fund $64,567.87, Recreation Center Fund $9,215.73, Gun Range Fund $386.17, Utility Fund $30,611.60, Liquor Dispensary Fund $81,943.06, Construction Fund $231,377.04, Total $656,422.88, and for confirmation of payment of the following claims dated 4/30/86: General Fund $79,258.47, Art Center $1,351.06, Swimming Pool Fund $24.40, Golf Course Fund $1335.60, Recreation Center Fund $439.49, Gun Range Fund $54.57, Utility Fund $11,816.84, Liquor Dispensary Fund $193,269.75, Total $287,550.18. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Mon June 2 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Room Mon June 9 Special Meeting (Survey Results - Strategic 7:00 P.M. Mgr Conf Rm Planning - Role of Council with Surrounding Communities) Mon June 16 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Room June 17 -20 LMC Annual Conference Duluth Mon July 7 Regular. Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Room Mon July 14 Special Council Meeting (Service Levels), 7:00 P.M. Mgr Conf Rm Mon July 21 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Room AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MAY 19, 1986 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL MINUTES OF HRA Meetings of March 31, April 3, 14, and 21, 1986, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by I. AWARD OF BID - Edinborough Painting Contract ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL PROCLAMATION - Respect for Law Week RESOLUTIONS OF COMMENDATION - Edina High School Athletic Teams I. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass. Lot Divisions, Plats, Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required to pass. Final Plat Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass. A. Preliminary Plat Approval 1. Dahle Replat of Warden Acres - Generally located south of Grove Street and west of Garden Avenue (Contd from 4- 21 -86) 2. Valley View Heights 3rd Addition - Generally located south of Valley View Road and east of Tracy Avenue B. Zoning Change 1. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -3 Planned Residential District - Robert Hansen - Generally located north of Crosstown Highway and east and north of Vernon Court II. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS III. AWARD OF BIDS A. Upgraded Radio Communications System B. Street Improvement Nos. BA -269, BA -270 and BA -271 C. Plow and Wings D. Traffic Signs E. Millpond Weed Harvesting IV. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Approval of Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of 5/13/86 B. Park Board Recommendation - Braemar Sports Complex C. On -Sale Beer License - St. Louis Rib Company D. Wine Licensing Procedure Report E. I -494 Corridor Study Report 1. Metropolitan Council`Agreement 2. Alternate Selection 3. Land Use F. Approval of Sanitary Sewer Renovation - Arden /Bruce /50th Street G. Dearborn Addition /Blake Woods Addition - Approval of Construction of Utilities and Streets and Ordering-Bids to be Taken (100% petition) H. Heritage Preservation Board - Request for Leave I. Request Pertaining to Massage License Ordinance (Contd from 5/5/86) J. Set Hearing Date - Final Plan Approval - France Avenue (6/2/86) K. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council L. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items Agenda Edina City Council May 19, 1986 j Page Two V. COMMUNICATIONS A. Request for Assessment of Connection Charge - Watermain No. 306 - 6709 Normandale Road VI. FINANCE A. Claims Paid. Motion of seconded by for payment of the following claims as per Pre -List dated 5/19/86: General Fund $229,930.09, Art Center $8,030.87, Swimming Pool Fund $360.45, Golf Course Fund $64,567.87, Recreation Center Fund $9,215.73, Gun Range Fund $386.17, Utility Fund $30,611.60, Liquor Dispensary Fund $81,943.06, Construction Fund $231,377.04, { Total $656,422.88, and for confirmation of payment of the following claims i dated 4/30/86: General Fund $79,258.47, Art Center $1,351.06, Swimming Pool Fund $24.40, Golf Course Fund $1335.60, Recreation Center Fund $439.49, Gun Range Fund $54.57, Utility Fund $11,816.84, Liquor Dispensary Fund $193,269.75, Total $287,550.18. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Mon June 2 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Room Mon June 9 Special Meeting (Survey Results - Strategic Planning = Role of Council with Surrounding Communities) Mon June 16 Regular Council Meeting June.17 -20 LMC Annual Conference Mon July 7 Regular Council Meeting Mon July 14 Special Council Meeting (Service Levels) Mon July 21 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Mgr Conf Rm 7:00 P.M. Council Room Duluth 7:00 P.M. Council Room 7:00 P.M. Mgr Conf Rm 7:00 P.M. Council Room ' T MINUTES EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MARCH 31, 1986 Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Courtney. PHASE II CONDOMINIUMS APPROVED. Mr. Rosland indicated that the housing is going so well that it will be creating a cash flow problem. He reminded the Commissioners that Phase I included Phase I of residential, the park, the elderly high rise and one office structure. The cash flow problem is evidenced in Phases II through VII where there is approximately $2.5 million of public amenities yet to build. The whole project could conceivably be completed and sold out and moved into by the summer of 1988. The records indicate that we are serving the young people in the area of financial assistance. In addressing the cash flow problem, a method would be to sell approximately $212 to $3 million worth of bonds. Mr. Hughes showed an overview of the changes.in the phasing plan approved by the Foundation. Staff recommends approval of this plan by HRA with the condition that Phase VII housing should be committed to at the same time that the Phase II office is committed. There being no further discussion, Commissioner Bredesen's motion to approve the revised phasing plan for'the Condominiums, with the condition recommended by staff, was seconded by Commissioner Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. LAND SALE AGREEMENT & REDEVELOPMENT CONTRACT APPROVED. Mr.,Hughes reported that the land sale agreement and redevelopment contract is proposed to be virtually identical for Phase II as for Phase I. The East Edina Housing Foundation has approved this contract. With HRA's approval of Phase II, a closing will be pursued on that particular piece of real estate in the near future, and there will be a commitment to install the public improvements and landscaping as done in Phase I. With no further discussion, Commissioner Turner's motion to approve the land sale agreement and redevelopment contract was seconded by Commissioner Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. AWARD OF BIDS CONTINUED TO APRIL 3, 1986. Mr. Rosland introduced the two packages of bids taken three weeks ago -- Edinborough Outdoor Park and Residential Amenities, and the Enclosed Public Park. He indicated that we are over budget and therefore bringing the problem to the HRA. The developers have recently committed another $250,000 to the park, and the developers will also raise the housing contribution to park maintenance by another $24,000 each year. Mr. Rosland recommends that the $250,000 be put into the park trust fund for ongoing maintenance. Mr. Peter Jarvis of BRW explained that in reference to the Outdoor Park and Residential Amenities, the bid packages would be administered by Bor -Son, the City's Construction Manager. The bid packages actually make up one contract with a total of $510,045. From a real estate standpoint, there is more square footage of landscaping and finished space,being done in Phase I than in all subsequent phases so that as much as possible can be constructed at the onset. The long -term maintenance is the responsibility of the Homeowner's Association, with capital replacement being Minutes Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority March 31, 1986 Page Two the 100% responsibility of the Association. In order to accomplish the budget on this project, Mr. Jarvis explained that four deduct alternatives are included in the price. The fountain, an entry gate from the park into the residential area and two structural seating arbors on the residential amenities area have been deleted. The actual park benches were bid as deduct alternates, and it.is recommended that these be taken out and delaying them until the final design is completed. The remaining money in the budget for a subsequent year is-in the range of $75,000. In regard to the Indoor Park, Mr. Jarvis reported that over the last four years the budgeted amount of $5 million has not changed. $5,894,834 isthe actual contract amount. The first cost estimate was on February 15, 1985 andwas a total of $5,225,000. On March 5, 1985, Bor -Son's second estimate was $4,565,000, after identifying a dozen areas within which to cut down the cost. For the next six months, construction drawings were brought to about a 98% completion. A 98% set of drawings was given to Bor -Son in September; one month later, a very detailed cost estimate came back, and it was presented on October 15, 1985, at an amount of $5,200,000. A series of deduct alternates were structured thereafter that would be built into the bid package which would hopefully" bring the total package within the $5 million budget. Of the 15 alternates structured, 12 were clearly deduct alternates and three were add alternates. Six of the twelve deduct alternates were accepted, as well as three voluntary alter- nates which is reflected in the $5,894,834 figure. Mr. Jarvis commented on four items which were included as a last resort: window washing, $87,500; a sophisticated automatic lighting system, $125,000; light bulb changing system, $40,000; emergency heating system, $25,000. Mr. Jarvis indicated that the Construction Manager does nc recommend that we re -bid. He believes that the quantity of work that is in the market place today is of such a load that if we re -bid it, the numbers might then again be higher. As a point of clarification, Mr. Jarvis explained that the Plant - scape bid of $359,122 is not.the capital cost. Of that figure, $291,535.28 repre- sents the entire Plantscape overstory and understory in place. $67,586.72 is the full guarantee and warranty to replace anything and everything and a training program for the City Staff, so that after the year when the warranty expires the gardeners on the City Staff will be trained to manage and care for the plant material. The seven oleanders are contraversial in that they are poisonous; it is recommended that they be taken out. Mr. Rosland pointed out that the tax.increment runs do support an additional $1 million of park costs.which would be in Phase .I alone. Phase I of housing will generate about $64,000 of .tax income for the project; through Phase VII, that income goes up to about $465,000 a year total income for the project. Mr. Fraser of Bachman's spoke in concern about .a conflict of interest; he.was surprised that the Construction Manager, Bor -Son, was the successful bidder for Package XII, the Plantscape, and he would like to see the City consider his bid before the award is made.. Mr. Jarvis explained that Bor -Son was the low bidder and is.the recommended company for the award. Bor -Son's contract for the package is McCaren Design, Inc., who is experienced in Plantscape installation. Mr. Rosland summed up the situation by stating that it will cost $510,000 for the Outdoor Park and Residential Amenities and $5.9 million on the Enclosed Public Park. He also pointed out that staff will be coming back to a regular Council Meeting to approve the sale of $3,000,000 worth of bonds for phases two through seven of the housing and the amenities which are committed.' Mr. Jarvis hoped that the Council would take into consideration the $250,000 contribution by the developers as an indication of good faith plus the increased maintenance charges; he does not recommend taking out any program areas, because on down the line they will all have a greater impact than we can now envision. t Minutes Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority March 319 1986 Page Three Commissioner Kelly urged that the Park Board look at the bid packages before the Council makes a decision. Commissioner Bredesen indicated that he is skeptical about spending $5,000,000 on this sort of a park; he feels that it is not needed and is in an inaccessible area of the City. As a result, he does not support accepting the bids. Mrs. Lonsbury pointed out that the Park Board would be willing to look over the bids and would call a special meeting for April 3, 1986, at 7:30 A. M. As a result of this decision, Commissioner Richards moved to continue the HRA Meeting to April 3 at 4:00 P. M. so as to allow the Park Board an opportunity to go over the bid packages carefully and in detail and then submit their recommendation at'the 4:00 meeting. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. The HRA Meeting was adjourned by motion of Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Turner, at 8:50 P. M., and carried unanimously. Executive Director MINUTES EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APRIL 3, 1986 Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Richards, Turner and Courtney. RESOLUTION ADOPTED AUTHORIZING THE BID PACKAGES SUBMITTED FOR:EDINBOROUGH PARK. Commissioner Richards reported that he had secured a commitment from the developers for $450,000 to the Park. Part of the contribution will be in the form of cash, and part will be in the form of additional charges against the condominium units. As a result of the Park Board's recommendation, Commissioner Richards introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) that the following bid packages be authorized for the development of Edinborough Park, with the hope that financial arrangements can be worked out.with the developers; if not, the Park should be redesigned with the whole program analyzed. OUTDOOR PARK & RESIDENTIAL AMENITIES Noble Nursery - Landscape 110,190 Bury & Carlson - Asphaltic Paving 28,700 C. R. Brazier - Concrete & Masonry 202,800 Waterproofing by Experts - Waterproofing & Caulking 14,230 Lakeland - Carpentry & Finishes 69,900 Gephart Electric - Electrical 63,425 TOTAL 510,045 ENCLOSED PUBLIC PARK Bor -Son Construction - Building Foundation & Shell 1,381,600 LeJune Company - Metal Structural Components 655,900 Lovering Associates - General Finishes 150,400 Waterproofing by Experts - Sheet Waterproof 6,520 Curran V. Nielsen - Flexible Sheet Roofing 117,700 Carciofini Caulking - Joint Sealants 3,900 Harmon Contract Glazing - Glass Enclosures 1,041,458 Custom Drywall - Drywall 76,000 Grazzini Brothers - Tile 28,570 Britco - Accoustical Ceiling 11,782 Anderson -Ladd - Resilient Flooring 63,768 St. Paul Linoleum - Carpet 4,386 Commercial Coatings - Painting 63,700 Northwest Studios - Stage.Curtain 11,000 St. Paul Bar & Restaurant - Food Service Equip. 4,395 Hauenstein & Burneister - Basketball Backstop 7,124 Specialty Sales - Entrance Mats 6,421 Flanagan Sales Company - Site Furnishings 46,650 Earl F. Anderson -- Playground Equipment 11,965 Swing Stage - Window Washing Equipment 77,500 Pools, Inc. - Swimming Pool 142,000 Holmstein Ice Rinks - Ice Rink 87,420 Olympic Pools - Fountains 19,960 Minnesota Elevator - Elevator 26,573 Klamm Mechanical - Plumbing, Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning 622,170 Minutes Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority April 3, 1986 Page Two Harris Mechanical - Fireprotection Gephart Electric - Electrical Bor -Son Construction - Plantscape Add Kiosk, Window Bracing 58,500 796,350 359,122 5,882,834 12;000 TOTAL 5,894,834 Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. On behalf of the Park Board, Joan Lonsbury expressed appreciation for all the effort on the part of Mr. Rosland and staff in undertaking the projects relative to Edinborough. Commissioner Courtney expressed his appreciation of Commissioner Richards' efforts in that he worked above and beyond the call of duty to reach a satisfactory commitment from the developers. The HRA Meeting was adjourned by motion of Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Turner, at 4:12 P. M., and carried unanimously. Executive Director MINUTES EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APRIL 14, 1986 Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Courtney. PAINTING BID ON EDINBOROUGH REJECTED AND TO BE RE -BID. Mr. Rosland reported that because of a mix -up on the specifications and the architectural drawings, staff recommends that the painting bid on Edinborough be rejected and re -bid. With no further discussion, Commissioner Kelly's motion to reject the painting bid on Edinborough and have it re -bid was seconded by Commissioner Richards. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. The HRA Meeting was adjourned by motion of Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Richards, at 8:05 P. M., and carried unanimously. Executive Director MINUTES EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APRIL 21, 1986 Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Courtney. MINUTES of March 17, 1986, were approved as submitted by motion of Commissioner Turner, seconded by Commissioner Kelly. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned by motion of Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Turner. Motion carried. Gordon L. Hughes Executive Director -K G � TO: ROM: VIA: SUBJECT: DATE: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IIRI+ Kenneth Rosland, City Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 1%4-Y l �/ t� V Material Description (General Specifications): Quotations /Bids: Company 1. S�� 2. ��ti/�i��u�f �WX Amount of Quote or Bid 14' 7 77 �C/fFA 774&A_X ;W4j ' Department Recommendation: SgAO- v � j,�ukdMIV� �-�% �z g ("0 Signature Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is is not within the amount budget for the purchase. John Wallin, Finance Director City Manager's Endorsement: y 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager _ Edinborough Enclosed Public Park Bid Tabulation Recap Package VI G Painting - Rebid Includes: 09900 Painting Voluntary Rirdprc Racy Rid Alt 4A Alt A7 Altcrnn+n Tn +nl Functional Design 58,465 Painting & Decorating Swanson & Youngdale 59,128 Sander &.Company, Inc. 59,400 Commercial Coatings 59,330 (4,500) J.B. Nelson 89,218 1,714: 165 Alternates: 6. Delete bench A &B from site furnishings. 7. Delete kiosk from site furnishings. Voluntary Alternates: 1. "Thorocoat" in lieu of "Thoroseal Plaster Mix ". Comment: 1. No bid bond was submitted with Functional Design Painting and Decorating's proposal. 2. Commercial Coatings includes epoxy where scheduled and their bid is based on the use of a boom truck for painting exposed structural steel and metal deck. Recommendation: The low qualified bidder is Swanson and Youngdale. The low bid total is $59,128.00. LOCATION MAP IPAMARI IETHODI tOOUNTRY DE Aii .EWNTARY i SCHOOL ;E p419 PARK.: N Zi 15: W < C3 IWIP WN I WE NUMBER S- 86 - 2 L 0 C A T 10 N 5501 Grove Street REQUEST Subdivision EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT I r. Daryl stressed that he the Commission's reco Nh o do so and retain ed the amenities of 'on. and Mr. Hansen wish ,, , comply emendations but fin-. are marketable housing Mr. Daryl the proposed units{" o the yan asked Mr. Daryl if diffe.'", Y „i�,,nt design .sites incorporXthe" e of the hill were cons ered for building placementDaryl responded that dferentdesign sites were cons' but any change in b,u ding placement would increase ber of steps fo r eae '' unit He add d th goal is for a i al number of stet e e r Mrs. McClell,a f'-.indicated does not support the revised plat. She domed this r an unplatted.piece of property and feels. grant-T- a variance request of 60% to 70% is excessive. ' e S4" sted the developers look again at constructing b %-• s that comply with the City's zoning requirements and"I er fit this site. Mr. Hansen told _ Com sion the road was constructed by the City of Edina._: onst'r ion of the road resulted in a 50 foot right-of d'` He a the Mayor and City Council realized i`.his piece':: roperty were to be developed it would`!" quire a cer" number of variances. Mr. Hansen said '. impact of this• oject is minimal due to the highway dir.d;` y across from it:�'4: Mr. Lars.` clarified for the Comm% ion the road was constructed.." a result of a petition b• Hansen. He pointed out_:' was constructed to take` ittle land as possible f_ ": Mr. Hansen's property. Mr.%' sen added the Council r­ gnized at the time of granting';1 petition that thiA ould be a difficult site to devel At that time no' to plans were reviewed by Council: Larsen said t" topography of this site may not warra j�, back yard /,- io for all the units. r. Palmer expressed agreement with Mrs. Mc'CI.R. and. Mr. Palmer moved to deny the request for prey "� ary t. Mrs. Paulus seconded the motion. All were in':;;. or. e motion carried. S °86 -2 Dahle Replat of Warden Acres Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the City Council at �(� \ its April 21, 1986 meeting referred the subject proposal back to the them for further study. Specifically, the Council asked that the Commission discuss lot sizes along the east -west extension of Oak Lane. The proposed preliminary plat contains lots 72.8 wide, or 2.2 feet less than the 75 feet required by the Ordinance. Assuming that existing property lines on the Benton Avenue lots would be reflected in a replat, most of the new lots would also measure 72.8 feet in width. However, if the entire south frontage is replatted at one time it would be possible to 'plat 8, conforming 75 foot lots. The total frontage on the new Oak Lane would be 602 feet. Mr. Larsen pointed out the north street frontage is somewhat different. Unless properties are combined the minimum lot size cannot be achieved. The only way to provide the minimum lot width would be to combine the subject property with all or a portion of the property to the immediate west. This property is an outlot created by Warden Acres Austin 2nd Replat. It measures 160 feet in width along the Oak Lane right of way. If combined four lots with 75 feet or more of frontage would result. Mr. Larsen concluded that staff recommends the following: 1. That the one new buildable lot be approved at 72.8 feet in width. We can see no reasonable alternative to this. 2. That the proposal for 2 outlots at 72.8 feet be modified to show only one outlot for the entire southerly one - half of the subject property. 3. That all new lots fronting on Oak Lane provide the 75 foot minimum lot width. Mr. Dahle, the proponent and concerned neighbors were.present. Mr. Lewis was presented with a signed petition from neighbors opposing the proposed subdivision and a letter from Evans Meineke. In reference to the letter submitted by Mr. Meinke which stated the City Council made a decision that the frontage width of lots developed in this area be approximately 90' feet, Mr. Larsen said he could not recall the Council or Commission stipulating a 90' foot lot requirement for this area. Mr Larsen pointed out this is a neighborhood in transition containing old and new homes. Mr. Larsen said a 145 foot lot is more out of character with the neighborhood than the proposed two lots of 72.8 feet.. Mr. Runyan asked if there is a schedule for the completion of Oak Lane. Mr. Larsen said that at this time there is no schedule for completion of the road. Completion of the road will happen when affected property owners petition for it's completion. Mrs. McClelland expressed her opinion that the neighborhood has been upgraded and suggested leaving the lot at 145 feet. She said she is very uneasy at granting a request for substandard lots. Mr. Larsen pointed out that lots sizes on Grove feet are 80 feet. Mr. Palmer asked the dimensions of the lots directly across from the proposed subdivision. Mr. Larsen said the Smaby Replat which includes the lots on Grove Street consist of 80 foot lots. The corner lot adjacent to the railroad tracks is substantially larger due to the easement for the power line. Mr. Runyan pointed out the proposed lots are narrower than the ones on Grove Street but appear deeper. He asked if the square footage of the proposed lots were comparable to the ones in the neighborhood. Mr. Skagerberg calculated lots in the area measure from 12,800 square feet, to 9,800 square feet. The proposed two lots measure just under 10,000 square feet. Mr. McClelland moved to retain one lot fronting Grove Street and one outlot. Mr. Del Johnson seconded the motion. Mr. Palmer stated he supports staff's position on this matter and is in agreement with the development of one new buildable lot. He added he would like to see one outlot instead of the proposed two. Mr. Skagerberg expressed agreement with Mr. Palmer. The following neighbors spoke in opposition to the proposed subdivision; E. Meineke of 5417 Grove Street, Mr. Breitenbucher of 5424 Grove Street, Richard Andron, 5808 Garden Avenue , Dan Hergotz, 5804 Garden Avenue, Greg Tripp, 5809 Garden Avenue, Their reasons are as follows: 1) They would like to see a continuation of the upgrading of their neighborhood. It is felt approval of this subdivision would be detrimental to that process. 2) The proposed lots do not comply with Edina's Zoning Ordinance of new lots which are to average 75 feet in width. 3) Existing lots that are less than 75 feet in width are two blocks away on Benton Avenue. These lots are not visible to Grove and Garden Avenues due to thick vegetation and a pond. Mr. Dahle, proponent, of Dahle construction stated that the proposed subdivision conforms to the neighborhood as it is today. The south side of Grove Street and Benton Avenue consist of older homes and this is the location of the proposed subdivision. He said he proposes to upgrade the existing home and plans to construct a very nice home on the remaining lot in character with the neighborhood. He added he feels if the lot remains at 145 feet in width it will be out of character with a neighborhood that generally consists of lots ranging from 75 feet to 80 feet. Mr. Ernie Hallgren of 5809 Johnson Drive stated he could not understand how it could be assumed that a home built on a 73 foot lot would be considered substandard to a home built on a 80 foot lot. Mr. Lewis called for a roll call vote on Mrs. McClelland's motion and Mr. Del Johnson's second: Jane Paulus Aye John Palmer Nay John Skagerberg Nay David Runyan Nay William Lewis Nay Del Johnson Aye Helen McClelland Aye John Bailey Aye Virginia Shaw Nay The motion failed. Mr. Palmer moved for preliminary approval of two buildable lots (one new lot) and one outlot and subject to staff conditions. Mr. Skagerberg seconded the motion. Upon roll call vote: Jane Paulus Nay John Palmer Aye John Skagerberg Aye David Runyan Aye William Lewis Aye Del Johnson Nay Helen McClelland Nay John Bailey Nay Virginia Shaw Aye The motion carried. GROVE c— Al,,-1f, /ine of Lod 38 1 � �S };r9 Ef it ,0460 STREET �v N S / /Y r zr oe -� / I -Surveil Dated 1 sl- POTLOT A dUITL `T� 9,979 1 9,9180 15y.f / T1.90 �,.� �`O,W g OAK /ANEW / Oak 14560 ' 1 Z ,,1554, /ne ol'Z l 39 � v µa..33 - 169.83 wcsr 452.16 ! 'a. 115.4 .T 13 - r 0.1. 'A 0. L'. A r JF0.o7 Ia 41. 9 IZ AIB9'5530 W. / oy :_ o 6ao y�„ so 8121. ! eti T Eas N Oe14 g RK p2 2' . to wos6 N a.. x 1 R o , 4 0 4i a 13u 3 �,� z Pg'i • `o ° $ _ ast e a' o `' � �:. a Is � � aoo SM _ •. .. � ,� � mil- �� xF o I�o.6d ° } ao o. So $ ' i.r n v d _' W -'.0 170_.66 N 0.56 EAST 6 « • c4D '~ V! ° �: we .ro M N 9° 'i,' _ EAT 409.20 - (20.46 EAST',0 �Eo,•• M. n • -_. . _ ..lµ5.7 i za 4 :fi 121.92 .W 120 50 9. o /�TS 75 / 5.6 . 50 75 : -- ` 14432 .' 33i �a j- aE�trl ° .o o :� N N 92'I`%^ O N ;; f' a o I V o W �o� 3 2 1(V `o V fyj ��z WILLIAM. Cs Z Q `�O o to ° ;, I'-� ,,HANSEN ; �+ Z Pi 7 o °p Z2 75 124. ~ M4sa y.• ' :4 2 tr°.'?i u ADD.2 ME I N �f 6401 so eesr 'Q 0; Z 199.56 J •., d 2 (.. o° ► • f kt IZO' •v ° • 2 r ZAi 'M C O. a` W -' ,�•,:- -. yzo set r�'s4w e, t x 0 al °RF O h �; 0 N 3 O 4 0 N r to. ie 120 '•. Qu Q_�¢. 4 C t`�-- �. ao /tyo 2 /Wy .v w 14 ; , `s �NB9 6 yC° FA °n .0 3 N 19 2.� ,-�Y a ;~ •� s. ,to I (Filed P10-6� g a I C ap 6.67 °. ,.3 �•� �ort of ,ot . :4 °s wso o.µ6 30, "s W 93.78 ev°�'° 58% 11n�°j _ a1 ° 4ia OAK .LANE B R bid ' � S� N .(°• (� ° LYL i _ a ,•. CIRCLE - �. �B3 d 126 � - . DD. N W � � Q � , 9 1 E �� 19 Z8 oc 11Z of r � 3 0V 4 N ^1 lost 3 .P' N� ' 14 ,b I 46 145,51 14 co . V I S.74 s`BENTON AVE. l 4 15.6' 145.4 1 5.52 14 60 $• l�s � `� t . ro 6 b; 0 1 0 of 49 z'. ti. ,c'r ao ,. ; . 3 .: , 1 fA o Ac A�" '1f7Pyd r_ g 2 I Q r .. •_ .,N 2' a >�� t4s. t 31 , 32 .3 Z. a _ 1 p 3 �` g v D:IZS WARDEN N. N N W J. Z ._`_ , 1 „�, • o g PI ACRES LOT 49, _ Z r f 4 '� ZFFS� vREPLATie " 145 /�� .1? O 00- BI - . 6 ZL2S E a 120.6 1455 4lrr .y 145.5Z .K. ' '�' u . 33•• 's fix• Xni 1 - y Jf _ dab W 80• l9_ _22. �'�13?_ . 91.SL. _ lIf . 7µ_01_4r1. _ °Q * VA IfJf0 9 8I 7i�, 1 '" M ' Possible new lots 75 feet or COURTRYSJDE * greater in width p 'q A10 9 7 S 1 5 4 + E ST ice. - �[ .I ' �. rsa, �. r - • Io 4 X70- %o &0 0 123.0 ! .0 150 ►150 II .o � 79�i. � 31z z I 1G5o 589's4'3o►/ n�• So g 9. to I I N z14•5 d 3 N 11�_ N 86'46`E <� o s!ti o z' I' o ` 0 0 15.0 - �h' o V •1i o A - p ,R1 136. .R 127. 1350. 1}50 111a '- ,zs a IZ �+ 'l l Io US ; 195.41 1 2i2.2i2 13 7 ,g .n �. �CJr 145.5. - fi 121. 110.0 s 1 118o 'Z$.o 169 120.0 S5 6 •'3 •1 _ e _ 116.4 S • � i {T � M � 1 � � ° ° � 1.. O I I Q .i :� `O ho.2 120•° S.I.. ,.��'a~ ~' h 5 I' -!B • i 5417 Grove Street Edina, MN 55436 April 22, 1986 City of Edina Attn: Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN Gentlemen: During meetings for the development of the Peterson ReplaIt (1979-1980), the Planning Commission agreed to build a new street called Garden Ave. The lot sizes were set by the city in the interest of attracting buyers and builders to this area. Along with the sub - divisions we Presented drawings to the city of homes with attached garages as requested, and drawings for updating existing properties to support the new construction by buyers /contractors. At that time the City of Edina gave ma telephone numbers of owners of properties in the area in order that I could contact them regarding development of a new street off Garden Avenue to Cak lane. Representative of the city and I geed during these discussions that if the new street was built between Garden Avenue and Oak lane, the lot sizes along that street should be approximately 901 wide to attract buyers who would build houses comparable to those already built in the neighborhood. This letter is being written to you in the interest of supporting and fulfilling that agreement and supporting the neighbors who have built homes in the $200,000 to $300,000 Price bracket. I request that the City stand by that decision and assure that the frontage. width of lots developed in this area be approximately 90o. Sincerely, 6044A , Evans Meineke PETITION We, as neighbors of the property proposed for subdivision, oppose said subdivision on the following grounds: 1) New lots would each be less than seventy -five feet wide, which does not comply with the City's previously enforced standards of minimum lot width for newly formed lots. 2) At least twelve lots have been created through sub- division in this neighborhood within the last five years, all of which have complied with the City's - minimum standard of seventy -five feet. Most of these new lots are consid- erably wider than seventy -five feet. 3) The new home construction which has taken place has significantly increased average property values in the neighborhood, making the creation of substandard narrow lots totally inappropriate and inconsistent with the existing neighborhood pattern. 4) The only existing lots which are less than seventy -five feet in width are two blocks away on Benton Avenue. These homes are separated from the Grove St. /Garden Ave. neighborhood by a pond and thick woods, are not visible and have average market values approximately one, -half the Grove /Garden neighborhood. 5) The motive for proposing this subdivision is profit rather than neighborhood improvement. It is our understanding that the developer wishes to keep the existing house and squeeze a new house next to it. The existing house is of minimal value and is an eyesore. The logical approach would be to remove the existing house and build a new house on the entire lot which is consistent with the neighborhood as a whole. In summary, the proposed subdivision does not meet the City's own minimum standards, is inconsistent with the existing neighborhood, and would detract from,.rather than enhance, the quality of the neighborhood as a whole, and we therefore stand opposed to it. r N E ADDRESS Grp p�,�rel 54-3b �- S9 0 �c Y� STi�Ez t f I--- 0 F F t-� 9 r C CA3L _"MM :.F1EtfsKgORH0o0----- ZS..J�Pctvrim i LGrTs- - ..AYr- - r-xl%- VJ(e -LbT .FFU)"T —>'AR6 WIM-M L 0" C A T g.. •.P N I R —� Z W OLINBER BLVD. LA ~ a SIDE . s �- 'PARK o .J N L - + - 5 f ••• FIRE STATION _ CO NIAL — ; CHURCH Ir {.yI' OOR CREEK VALL VAL LEA i' BAPTIST ID t^ HI L I / CIR PARK` R / T ST W GRA'E TERR = A 4 �d . . I SUE 11) IVISI N U M B E R S -84 -9 Valley View Heights 2nd Addition S -86 -3 Valley View Heights 3rd Addition L O C A T 10 N Generally located south of Valley View Road and east of Tracy. REQUEST EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT f 1 III. NEW BUSINESS: Q G � \ S -86 -3 Valle y View Heights 0� 30 Addition Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the subject property was recently platted as Valley View Heights 2nd Addition. The Plat received final approval on November 19, 1984. Since that time it has been discovered that a small portion of Hennepin County right -of -way was erroneously included in the plat. Because the plat has been recorded it is necessary to replat the property to correct the error. Mr. Larsen pointed out the southerly boundary line adjustment required by the County results in the loss of between 3 and 6 feet of lot depth. He added all of the lots continue to comply with Zoning Ordinance requirements. Mr. Larsen concluded that staff considers this to be a technical correction. The lots are nearly identical to the previous plat and he recommends approval. . Mr. Skagerberg moved for preliminary plat approval. Mr. Runyan seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried. M k. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION S -86 -3 Refer to: General Location: APRIL 30, 1986 Valley View Heights 3rd Addition Attached plat North of Crosstown Highway, south of Valley View Road and east of Hillside Road The subject property was recently platted as Valley View Heights 2nd Addition. The Plat received final approval on November 19, 1984. Since that time it has been discovered that a small portion of Hennepin County right -of- way was erroneously included in the plat. Because the plat has been recorded it is necessary to replat the property to correct the error. The southerly boundary line adjustment required by the County results in the-loss of between 3 and 6 feet of lot depth. All of the lots continue to comply with Zoning Ordinance requirements. Recommendation Staff considers this to be a technical correction. The lots are nearly identical to the previous plat. We recommend approval. CVV `v SCALE IN FEET V, O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT \;"\ BEARINGS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED / Sk , \-bl N I. W. CORNER OF TRACT A, R 1. L. S. No. 519 �J L N in 7. ts, AN Ir ` \ \v\ j � \ � \ \\ p Z O.• v\\\ • \ \v \ aZ, • �oS� �.eN l 'r % O o O ° . � \ p / . i. o t,0 .110 vo \v 0 y�g � a o% NO CT3 �.� "R �' to h� p -J w��\p• y \goo 6 P �ONO\NG�\ ° �ioe� � / / 5'000 ILI co 09 VM NSS 7869 MEAS T�° o v 6 V`p� �� ,I ^�„'� \/`�'-�� G�•oE� 7g.96, �H/ 6B9) 8/1 A Lne s I/ ✓NZ R0. ° Point ��he s`� c° y o t ,►ne °t G j Jnn1 %0 f�t°ce� east ° ,� R 0`N 0355 u une �� i g \ ^ I eh P`29a o - -� eT62'' NZ •Pig Oo�' �5 9�ois�O 1' V` �V Drainage and Utility 7500 - 6 `� ore shown thus: easements JPb 4�' Lb. line of Trncl A 50 100 150 200 E IN FEET RTES IRON MONUMENT / RINGS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED N. W. CORNER OF TRACT A, R.L.S. No. 519 _ r o AtO \ a �` l) ^ 5c��•52 \ s F NO Zip 06 o� Ir �2Ta \ 6C J e^. \mss % \ v9 \ Oo m s os� oc` 1 it t\'AO ao A\ �\ 9 t1 ,y 0y ( 0y : � 0 O�`� �/ O A oi oe °r sP ° ce PpS N rco -T13-A0 S j"ct ° t O r% AO A 8 so°^\ of e { 0'0 f %%1'e e o 0 -'0 • tro? o e\ e°s% ")V, 1e O\ V ° \ \ ° p s sr w� ' . c ` 1 Drainage and Uti NYr•\Y poc' o e' 1� ` are,' shown thus: ,99 \6' 6Z pe t \, 75.00 S88 °23'40 °E S. line of Tract 8 5 W. corner of Tract 8 Y '44 , �S � "PROPOSED FINAL { .F� Being 5 feet in width, and adjoining lo, feet in width and adjoir as shown on the plat. RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR VALLEY VIEW HEIGHTS 3RD ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of.the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "VALLEY VIEW HEIGHTS 3RD ADDITION ", platted by Kent P. Swanson and Sharon J. Swanson, husband and wife, and Marvin D. Bullock and Barbara A. Bullock, husband and wife, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of May 19, 1986, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 19, 1986, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 28th day of May, 1986. City Clerk MEMO ` DATE: May 16, 1986 TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: Craig Larsen, City Planner SUBJECT: Z -86 -1 Robert Hansen, R -1 Single Dwelling District to Planned Residential :District, PRD -3 a The subject proposal has twice been heardoby the Planning Commission. Both times the Commission voted to deny the rezoning request. The proponent has now opted to make modifications to the plan and proceed directly to the Council. The major change in the attached plan from previous plans is the increased front street setback. The setback has been increased from 15 feet to 25 feet. Thirty -five feet is required (the 40 foot setback shown on the site plan is measured from the curb and not from the property line as required). The setback from the cul de sac has been increased from 6 feet to 10 feet. Here 35 feet is also required. Other setbacks, unit sizes and design remain unchanged from those reviewed by the Planning Commission. In our initial staff report, we suggested that some reduction in the required setbacks may be warrented due to the shape of the property and the presence of steep slopes. The attached plan provides the suggested front street setback but does not provide the suggested setback from the cul de sac or from the rear property line for the most westerly building. Although the most recent revision to the site plan does address our most serious criticism of the plan, the front street setback, large setback variances still exist. In order to remove the variances it would be necessary to give up the rear yards and /or redesign with.smaller units. p its= T. •yam y' ti NUMBER z -86 -1 L O C A TI O N North of Crosstown Highway and east and north of Vernon Court REQUEST Rezoning EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT II. OLD BUSINESS: G, Z -86 -1 Robert Hansen `-� Mr. Larsen asked the Commission to recall that the �\ subject proposal was continued at the Commissions April 2, 1986 meeting to allow Mr. Hansen and Mr. Daryl an opportunity to prepare a revised site plan. Mr. Larsen stated at this time he has not received a revised plan. He added Mr. Hansen, proponent and Mr. Daryl, Architect are present this evening to submit their proposal.; Mr. Daryl told the Commission he and Mr. Hansen had reviewed their requests with careful consideration. He informed the Commission the requested setback from the cul de sac has been accomplished. He said the request by the Commission for maintaining the 35 foot front yard setback from the right -of -way would, result in a large cut, which would necessitate high retaining walls and little back yard /patio space for the future tenants. He added such a large cut would disturb the permanency of the hill. Mr. Daryl asked the Commission to reconsider their position on the front yard setback and allow the requested.30 foot setback from the curb to remain. Mr. Daryl pointed out that in maintaining the 35 foot rear yard setback the site is in compliance except for a small point where the setback is decreased to 29 feet. `— " Mr. Daryl stressed that he and Mr. Hansen wish to comply with the Commission's recommendations but find they are unable to do so and retain marketable housing. Mr. Daryl explained the amenities of the proposed units -to the Commission. Mr. Runyan asked Mr. Daryl if different design sites incorporating use of the hill were considered for building placement. Mr. Daryl responded that different design sites were considered, but any change in building placement would increase the number of steps for each unit. lie added their goal is for a minimal number of steps. Mrs. McClelland indicated she does not support the revised plat. She added this is an unplatted.piece of property and feels that granting a variance request of 60% to 70% is excessive. She suggested the developers look again at constructing buildings that comply with the City's zoning requirements and better fit this site. Mr. Hansen told the Commission the road was constructed by the City of Edina. Construction of the road resulted in a 50 foot right -of -way. He added the Mayor and City Council realized if this piece of property were to be developed it would require a certain number of variances. Mr. Hansen said the impact of this project is minimal due to the highway directly across from it. Mr. Larsen clarified for the Commission the road was constructed as a result of a petition by Mr. Hansen. He pointed out it was constructed to take as little land as possible from Mr. Hansen's property. Mr. Larsen added the Council recognized at the time of granting the petition that this would be a difficult site to develop. At that time no site plans were reviewed by Council. Mr. Larsen said the topography of this site may not warrant a back yard /patio for all the units. Mr. Palmer expressed agreement with Mrs. McClelland. Mr. Palmer moved to deny the request for preliminary plat. Mrs. Paulus seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried. s ncil osal he at He recommended Final Rezoning and Pre ry Plat oval with the following conditions: nal Plat Approval 2. vision dedication 3. Dever. rs agreement 4. Redeve'• ent Contract 5. Vacation M ummit A. and appropriate cross easeme wit ' wnhouse owners, ,ed Mr. John Rockford o unity Development Corporation representing the Woodha ect was present_to answer the Commission's question,_' A discussion - rdin the g p a sal ensued. Mr. Palmer said placement a island is a d attempt to discourage traf• from using Summit a short -cut between Vernon and In chen Avenues. Mrs. lelland asked Mr. Larsen who w' handle the granting of iances on this project. pointed out the hardship ue of the site should be tinned in granting these va ces. Mr. Larsen the Council will hear the varia requests and he wou elay Mrs. McClelland's concern abo he hardship of th te. r. Palmer moved approval for final rezoning d pr. urinary plat approval subject to staff condit S. Shaw seconded the motion. All were in favor. The ion carried. III. NEW BUSINESS: Z -86 -1 Robert Hansen, R-1,-Single Dwelling � Unit District to PRD -3, Planned Residential District Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the subject property measures approximately 220 feet by 680 feet and is 138,900 v` square feet in area. This vacant parcel is zoned R -1, but is shown on the Comprehensive Plan as suitable for low density attached residential at up to 6 units per acre. Directly south of the property is the Crosstown Highway. City owned open space (Krahl Hill) borders most of the northerly property line. North of the westerly portion of the site there is one single family home and two, 5 unit townhouse projects. Directly to the east is a 36,000 square foot parcel owned by the Masonic Temple. Further east are the doubles along Gleason Court. The proponent is requesting a rezoning of the property to PRD -3 to allow for the development of 16 townhouse units evenly divided among four buildings. All units are proposed as 2 story structures, with basement and an attached 2 car garage. Half the units would provide approximately 2,600 square feet of living area and half would contain nearly 3,000 square feet of finished space not including basement. Exterior materials would be primarily brick with some wood accents. Mr. Larsen added the PRD -3 zone requires a front street setback of 35 feet, an interior side yard setback of 20 feet and a rear yard setback of 35 feet. All four buildings fail to provide the required front street setback. The proposed front street setbacks vary from 6 feet at the cul de sac to 25 feet for portions of the most westerly building. the 30 foot setback illustrated on the plans is measured from the street and not the property line as required. The typical setback provided is 15 feet. The most westerly building provides a 25 foot rear yard where 35 feet is required. Mr. Larsen concluded staff supports the townhouse concept and the density proposed for this site. It is compatible with other nearby developments. The development proposal is also consistent with policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan, especially its attempt to avoid the steep slopes on the site. However, he said he believe's the proposed front street setback variance is too great. As proposed it would not be possible to park on the driveway without violating the'City's Nuisance ordinance which requires that parking be at least 15 feet from.the curb. A front street setback of 25 feet would be more reasonable. This could be accomplished without significant alteration of the hill, but would not allow rear yards for the 2 easterly buildings. Staff recommended continuing this item to allow the proponent to rework the site plan within the following parameters: 1. Front street setback of 25 feet. 2. A setback of 20 feet from the cul de sac. 3. A 35 foot rear yard setback from the northerly property line. 4. Hennepin County approval of any landscaping on the right -of -way. The preliminary plan proposed a heavy landscape buffer south of Vernon Court. In the past the county has not allowed landscaping on its right -of -way. Mr. Robert Hansen and Mr. David Daryl, proponents, were present. A discussion ensued between Commission members and the proponents regarding the front yard setback. Commission members felt that at least a 25 foot front yard setback should be maintained at this site. Commission Members felt this item should be continued to allow the proponents time to work and develop a revised site plan. Mrs. McClelland moved to continue Z -86 -1 to the April 39, 1986 Community Development and Planning Commission Meeting. Mr. Palmer seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried. 2 Preliminary Plat Approval Warden Acres Dahle Reply Mr. sen informed the Commissio a subject property is a deve d single family lot. Th roperty measures 145.6 feet I' 99.15 feet and is 39A square feet in area. The zoning is 10, Single Dwelling. it District. The propone` are requesti.' a subdivision of the property which wo'�� create one w buildable lot (lot 2). In addition two ou s which.- ld be held for future development are pro"'' d. Thy'` proposed lots are nearly identical in size meas__'ng, -, .8 by 137 and containing 9,979 square feet. Each p ro p - of is 2.2 feet short of the minimum lot width. Mr. Larsen pointed;; ­_ a subject property is the key property in the plan to- eve,c, a new east -west street connecting Oak Lane an Garde' venue. Approval of the proposed plat would C plete the orth one -half of the necessary street ricj' -of -way. cedent for this plat was established by Ward. Acres Aust'- eplat (1976) on the west, and Warden A Xes Peterson Rel t (1979) on the east. It has been anticl ated that once 0 right -of -way for the extension of Oak-:ane was complete t the deep lots along Benton Avenue w - d be subdivided. A- r the necessary right of way i° cquired and the road wa improved, outlots A and B could b..,'- eplatted as buildable 1c 1 . Mr. La- ­n added the proposed subdivi,.'on is a logical extension ast subdivisions in the areal A full -width right-of-W-- exists to the east and one hal f the necessary; ght -of-way exists on the west. s plat would provide ,c necting the link. It should be noy , however, the six..- operty owners on lots 39, 40 and 41 Warden Acres,cti• t cooperate in order to gain the anti ated develop ent potential south of the new street. 0 t this time the proposed plat would create only one ne. uildable lot, lot 2, fronting on Grove Street. The R osed lot width is some what less than lots in other ent replats in the area which have been 75 feet or more width. However, when Oak Lane is extended lots to the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APRIL 2, 1986 Z -86 -1 Robert Hanson, R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -3, Planned Residential District General Location: North of Crosstown Highway and east and north of Vernon Court Refer to: Attached preliminary plans. The subject property measures approximately 220 feet by 680 feet and is 138,900 square feet in area. This vacant parcel is zoned R -1, but is shown on the Comprehensive Plan as suitable for low density attached residential at up to 6 units per acre. Directly south of the property is the Crosstown Highway. City owned open space (Krahl Hill) borders most of the northerly property line. North of the westerly portion of the site there is one single family home and two, 5 unit townhouse projects. Directly to the east is a 36,000 square foot parcel owned by the Masonic Temple. Further east are the doubles along Gleason Court. The proponent is requesting a rezoning of the property to PRD -3 to allow for the development of 16 townhouse units evenly divided among four buildings. All units are proposed as 2 story structures, with basement and an attached 2 car garage. Half the units would provide approximately 2,600 square feet of living area and half would contain nearly 3,000 square feet of finished space not including basement. Exterior materials would be primarily brick with some wood accents. The PRD -3 zone requires a front street setback of 35 feet, an interior side yard setback of 20 feet and a rear yard setback of 35 feet. All four buildings fail to provide the required front street setback. The proposed front street setbacks vary from 6 feet at the cul de sac to 25 feet for portions of the most westerly building. the 30 foot setback illustrated on the plans is measured from the street and not the property line as required. The typical setback provided is 15 feet. The most westerly building provides a 25 foot rear yard where 35 feet is required. Recommendation: - Staff supports the townhouse concept and the density proposed for this site. It is compatible with other nearby developments. The development proposal is also consistent with policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan, especially its attempt to avoid the steep slopes on the site. However, we believe the proposed front street setback variance is too great. As proposed it would not be possible to park on the driveway without violating the City's Nuisance ordinance which requires that parking be at least 15 feet from the curb. A front street setback of 25 feet would be more reasonable. This could be accomplished without significant alteration of the hill, but would not allow rear yards for the 2 easterly buildings. Staff recommends continuing this item to allow the proponent to rework the site plan within the following parameters: 1. Front street setback of 25 feet. 2. A setback of 20 feet from the cul de sac. 3. A 35 foot rear yard setback from the northerly property line. 4. Hennepin County approval of any landscaping on the right -of -way. The preliminary plan proposed a heavy landscape buffer south of Vernon Court. In the past the county has not allowed landscaping on its right -of -way.. 1 11, L• [7 V S' L• r I N A •Taa a■ •r�Yr •T n • of lo... fTy L I.•T aill JYYrr i6 -'- It __ -- uta t �Ir � - T DAVID C. DARRELL INC. e r ^ ^' ^ wM �� i��ryq yam• ARC X ITiCiURC A ►LANNINO �;� [D�fA nrrLUU fs,a UNIT "" QRMF,.L6NT NGOR e•�aa• T,.q 1 ,1 I I� 1 LMIT •ll• PIRST FLOOR PLAN 7�'�Co• mo q •�.+... __EMk1C1 Ye - fJ 0.0o u � r �•T UNIT 'Y Z- PIDO[ • AI.TERN ATM N•. leo' �� q= DAVID ARC IT IO..a� II..NaN .OY•... ,w.., LL ING PLAIININO ..., 2 tN„ ,It-tt.MY uuIT •Y• UNIT • - •Y' nR `.ur�OR rL.N 'Y• seta .oi ■Ima rLw •r• RrM&oe Nr FL69K /LAN • ►•• I DAVID C. DARREIL IMC. ! e4eaJf NAAwlre it \IanNe ARMUCTURE VEANNIN6 newer• Ara y!r\y pT •A11 v ti eearn.h M • Y R .MIR w! IAAAEMI IMA. M—EWTA ITEIEINON saw A ! � UNIT 'e' -5ourH E-LMXOTI%W � . � �r 5 DAVID C. DARRELL INC LA.—Ul LAN M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager DATE: May 15, 1986 FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Upgraded Communications System Bid Recommendation On April 22, 1986, the City of Edina opened bids on an upgraded communications system. A two -part bid was requested. Bids received: Contract No. 1902A, Console, base stations and installation. 1. General Communications, St. Louis Park, MN a. General Electric base stations and Kustom Electronics console . . . $183,233.00. b. General Electric base stations and Com Center console . $193,233.00. 2. Motorola Communications & Electronics, Inc., Minnetonka, MN a. Motorola base stations and Motorola console . . . $209,799.00. Contract No. 1902B, tower, antennas, coax cable & installation. 1. Motorola Communications & Electronics, Inc., Minnetonka, MN . . . $46,068.00. 2. Valmont Electrical Products, Inc., Valley, NE . . . $36,173.00. For Contract 1902A, I recommend the award of the bid to Motorola Communications, Inc. for $209,779.00. Motorola Communications, Inc. is not the low bidder. General Communications is the low bidder, however, they submitted a bid with a major non - compliant component to the upgraded system. For Contract 1902B, I recommend the award of the bid to Valmont Electrical Products, Inc., Valley, NE, for $36,173.00. Valmont Electrical Products, Inc. submitted the low compliant bid. Budget monies have been made available for the purchase of the system. The project engineer, Mr. John DuBois, and City Attorneys, Mr. Thomas Erickson and Mr. Matthew Seltzer, have been consulted as to the above recommendations. Additional information is available for discussion of the technical and operational aspects of the system. CRAIG G. WANSON CHIEF O POLICE _TiT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council 'OM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City - Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS.OF $5,000 DATE: May 19, 1986 Material Description (General Specifications): Upgrade of communications system. Contract 1902A, Console, base stations and installation. ,Quotations /Bids: Company 1. General Communications - Kustom console 2. General Communications - Com Center console Motorola Communications & Electronics Department Recommendation: Motorola Communications & Electronics - $209,799.00 Signature __�t .A- Amount -of Quote or Bid $183,233.00 $193,233.00 $209,799.00 P C. Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is ✓ is not within the amount budget for the purchase. John Wallin, Finance Director City Manager's Endorsement: `/ 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council 'ROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: May 19, 1986 Material Description (General Specifications): Upgrade of communications system. Contract 1902B, tower, antennas, coax cable & installation. Quotations /Bids: Company 1. Motorola Communications & Electronics 2. Valmont Electrical Products Department Recommendation: Valmont Electrical Products - $36,173.00 Signature Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is is not r /I Amount: of Quote or Bid $46,068.00 $36,173.00 R ke, Department within the amount budget for the purchase. cq_�- John Wallin, Finance Director City Manager's Endorsement: I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: -isck, TO: FROM: VIA: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor and City Council Francis J. Hoffman, P.E. City Engineer Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: May 15, 1986 Material Description (General Specifications): / Contract #86 -2 (Eng) - York Avenue & Edinborough Permanent Street Surfacing, Concrete Curb & Gutter & Sidewalk Improvement No.'s BA -269, BA -270 and BA -271 Quotations /Bids: Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. See attached Bid Tabulation 2. Kf vepartment i tion: McNamara Contracting Co., Inc. - $670,037.84 Engineering Department Sig t re Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is f is not within the amount budget for the purchase. John Wallin, Finance Director City nager's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 4_1f. 2. I recommend as an alternative: Kenneth Rosland, eity Manager — BID TABULATION CITY OF EDINA. MINNESOTA CONTRACT #86 -2 (ENG PERMANENT STREET SURFACING, CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO.'S-BA-269, BA-27U-,-B-A---2'71 S.A.P. 120 - 020 -17, S.A.P. 120 - 136 -04 YORK AVENUE & EDINBOROUGH BID OPENING - THURSDAY, MAY 15, 1986 11:00 A.M. BIDDER SECTION I SECTION II SECTION III GRAND TOTAL McNamara Contracting Co., Inc. $382,288.21 $95,231.15 $192,518.48 $670,037.84 Bury & Carlson, Inc. $387,917.87 $92,541.82 $197,561.09 $678,020.78 C. S. McCrossan $377,206.02 $99,281.15 $201,726.16 $678,213.33 Valley Paving Co. $389,375.57 $96,136.32 $201,211.56 $686,723.45 Hardrives, Inc. $388,108.05 $106,261.55 $214,484.80 $708,854.40 Alexander Construction $411,761.84 $103,385.36 $204,243.52 $719,390.72 Northwest Asphalt $416,151.00 $109,764.07 $205,652.21 $731,567.28 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: .$475,485.65 $113,510.00 $246,193.40 $835,189.05 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: May 15, 1986 Material Description (General Specifications): 2 Plows & Wings for Dump Trucks Quotations /Bids: Company 1. LaHass Mfg. & Sales 2. Little Falls Machine Lepartmenr xecommendation: �Aqx Amount of Quote or Bid $11,520.00 $12,326.00 LaHass Mfg'. & Sales $11,520.00 Public Works - Street gnat a Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is/,- is not within the amount budget for the purchase. John Wallin, Finance Director City anager's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE -TO: Mayor and City Council 'ROM: Francis J. Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: May 13, 1986 Material Description (General Specifications): Traffic Signs Supplies for Sign Shop - Quotations /Bids: Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Earl F. Anderson & Associates $6,259.23 2. Newmann Signs $6,919.50 Decker Supply $7,722.85 4. M. R. Sign Co. $8,196.64 5. Gopher Sign Co. $9,514.46 Department Recommendation: Earl F. Anderson & Associates - $6,259.23 Public Works - Street Sign ure Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid isV"*' is not within the amount budget for the purchase. -) l,,,J c' John Wallin, Finance Director City Manager's Endorsement: �1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: -`Y REQUEST FOR PURCHASE -TO: Mayor and City ouncil FROM: �P, poaJ VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: 176-Y / 9 / � v-` Material Description (General Specifications): Quotations /Bids: Company L (_ f ©^JA 2. /Jo 07rrie7,- At S 3. veparcment Kecommendation: /�/<A cwF- s .- Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is, is not Cit/nager's Endorsement: Amount of Quote or Bid A Z05� .. ignature Department within the amount budget for the purchase. John Wallin, Finance Director 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: eenneth kRo and, City M pager �r MIDWEST LAKE MANAGEMENT May 17, 1986 To: City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Cost Quote for Weed Removal at Edina Mill Pond. Cost: $284.00 per acre x 16 = $4,544.00 Two Cuttings = $9,088.00 Cost Includes: - Cutting and removing the weeds from the water. - Disposal of the cut weeds away from the site(s). - All mobilization fees. The city shall provide equipment i.e. front -end loader, to assist in the launching and retrieval of contractors equipment. Respectfully submitted, MIDWEST AQUA CARE, INC. �homasJ. Oertz President Encl. MIDWEST AQUA CARE, INC. Ar.'3A RA1 RAN7 OFN . FTNINA MN r%r%A'2r% . /C.1')1 079_gr+77 MINUTES TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MAY 13, 1986 9:00 A.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Fran Hoffman, Chairman Lois Coon Alison Fuhr MEMBERS ABSENT: Gordon Hughes Craig Swanson OTHERS PRESENT: Captain Leonard Kleven, Edina Police Department Robert Dankey, 7300 Shannon Drive Perri Levitus, 7205 Shannon Drive SECTION A Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified, and the Council's authorization of recommended action. NONE. SECTION B Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request. NONE. SECTION C Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others. 1. Request for "NO RIGHT TURN ON RED" sign at the intersection of Highway 100 - southbound exit ramp and Edina Industrial Boulevard. Request received from R. D. Rich, 5100 Edina Industrial Boulevard. ACTION TAKEN: Mrs. Fuhr moved that the matter be referred to the Minnesota Department of Transportation MINDOT for their consideration. Mrs. Coon seconded the motion. Motion carried 3-0. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES May 13, 1986 Page 2 (Continued) 2. Request for installation of a three -way "STOP" sign at the intersection of Shannon Drive and Kemrich Drive. Continued from April meeting for additional study. ACTION TAKEN: Captain Kleven reported the results of several speed and enforcement surveys. The speeds were comparable with most other.residential streets in Edina. Mr. Hoffman commented that, due to injuries sustained by employees in the Engineering Department and construction staffing requirements, they had been unable to complete their studies of the area. Mrs..Levitus, an area resident, stated that there are many young children In the area and skateboarders are seen frequently on Shannon Drive. Kemrich Drive is used by area children on bicycles to access William Wardwell Lewis Park. She stated the most common time for speeders is . between 7 and 10 P.M. on Friday nights during good weather. Mr. Dankey, another area resident, stated that traffic from both north and south descends towards the intersection of Shannon and Kemrich and a "STOP" sign at this intersection is the only means of slowing traffic. Mr. Hoffman stated that center lanes could be painted in the roadway near this intersection to clearly define lane separation. Mrs. Fuhr moved to continue the issue for additional study until the June 10, 1986 Committee Meeting. Mrs. Coon seconded the motion. Mo iot n carried 3 -0. Mrs. Coon wished to make a matter of record that she favored sending a letter to the area residents advising them of the problem and soliciting their cooperation in correcting it. Respectfully submitted, EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE PERSPECTIVE VIEW FROM SOUTHWEST BRAEMAR SPORTS COMPLEX /61� S. iD.iL er TABLE OF CONTENTS LETTER OF INTRODUCTION SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS I CONCEPTS II PRESENT UTILIZATION OF BRAEMAR ARENA AND PAVILION III PRESENT UTILIZATION OF THE GYMNASTICS FACILITY IV OUTLINE OF THE COMMUNITY NEEDS V FUTURE UTILIZATION OF THE BRAEMAR SPORTS COMPLEX A. ICE SURFACE P. NON -ICE SURFACE C. GYMNASTICS D. OTHER USES VI CONSTRUCTION AND REHABILITATION ALTERNATIVES A. REMODEL EXISTING ARENA AND PAVILION: CONSTRUCT A NEW GYMNASTICS FACILITY. B. CONVERT PAVILION TO A GYMNASTICS FACILITY; CONSTRUCT A NEW OLYMPIC -SIZE RINK. WITH FUTURE EXPANSION FOR A THIRD ICE SHEET. C. CONSTRUCT A NEW OLYMPIC -SIZE PINK AND GYMNASTICS FACILITY. REMODEL EXISTING PAVILION FOR MULTI -USE BUILDING. VII ARCHITECTURAL CONSIDERATIONS VIII FUNDING ALTERNATIVES A. REVENUE BONDS B. USER GROUP CONTRIBUTIONS C. INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTIONS D. FUNDRAISERS IX CONCLUSIONS X TIMETABLE FOR IMPLEMENTAION APPENDIX A ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS APPENDIX B COPY OF SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRES I CONCEPTS (WHAT IS PHYSICALLY BEIiNG PROPOSED) II PRESENT UTILIZATION OF BRAEMAR ARENA AND PAVILION A. USES B. TIME ALLOCATION C. REVENUE /EXPENSE ( TO BE COMPLETED BY PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT) III PRESENT USES OF THE GYMNASTICS FACILITY A. USES B. TIME ALLOCATION C. REVENUE /EXPENSES ( TO BE COMPLETED BY THE GYMNASTICS ASSOCIATION:) IV OUTLINE OF COMMUNITY NEEDS ( TO BE COMPLETED BY SPECIAL SUB - COMMITTEE) V FUTURE UTILIZATION A. ICE SURFACE i . HOB :KEY ASSOCIATION 2.FIGURE SKATING CLUB 3. HOCKEY SCHOOLS 4.OTHER EVENTS ( TO BE COMPLETED BY HOCKEY AND FIGURE SKATING ASSOCIATION) B. NON -ICE SURFACE 1. USERS c. TIME ALLOCATION 3.REVENUE /EXPENSE ( TO BE COMPLETED BY SUB - COMMITTEE) C. GYMNASTICS FACILITY 1 . USES c.TIME ALLOCATIONS 3.REVENUE /EXPENSE (TO BE COMPLETED BY GYMNASTICS ASSOCIATION) D. OTHER ACTIVITIES 1. USERS 2.TIME ALLOCATION 3.REVENUE /EXPENSE C (TO BE COMPLETED BY SUB - COMMITTEE) V1 CONSTRUCTION AND REHABILITATION! ALTERNATIVES A. REMODEL AND CONSTRCT GYMNASTICS FACILITY B. CONVERT PAVILION TO A GYMNASTICS FACILITY; CONSTRUCT NEW OLYMPIC -SIZE RINK. C. CONVERT A NEW OLYMPIC -SIZE RINK AND GYMNASTICS FACILITY REMODEL EXISTING PAVILION FOR MULTI -USE BUILDING AS ORIGINALLY INTENDED. (COMPLETED BY ARCHITECT) VII ARCHITECTURAL CONSIDERATIONS 1 COST ESTIMATES (COMPLETED BY ARCHITECT) VIII FUNDING ALTERNATIVES A. REVENUE FONDS B. USER GROUP CONTRIBUTIONS C. INDIVIDUAL CONTR I BUT I ONS D. FUNDRAISERS (TO BE COMPLETED BY FINANCIAL TASK FORCE NOEL RAHN -- CH M) ) IX CONCLUSIONS (IMPUT BY ALL MEMBERS) X - TIMETABLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION (CITY PART! & REC. DEPT. + ARCHITECT) MAY 1986 TO: MEMBERS OF THE PARK BOARD OF THE CITY OF EDINA FROM: BRAEMAR SPORTS COMPLEX COMMITTEE SUBJECT: BRAEMAR ARENA AND PAVILION STUDY At the suggestion of various associations and the Park and Recreation Department. A committee was formed to evaluate the needs and uses of the Braemar Arena and Pavilion Complex. This committee was commissioned to survey the community needs and uses. Currently, as well as in the future, measure the quality and life expectancy of the present facility, hire an architect to develop an analysis of the site, determine the most efficient use of the area and to evaluate funding alternatives for. the improvement of the complex. The Braemar Sports Complex Committee consists of thirteen individuals as well as the consulting architect. The committee has been in regular session every other week since December and is ready to propose its findings to you. Thank you for the opportunity to present this report. Braemar Sports Complex Committee BRAEMAR SPORTS COMPLEX COMMITTEE MEMBERS REVISED 3/1/86 ED HOWAT EDINA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION - CHAIRMAN HOME 944 -2985 5900 CHAPEL DR. (35) WORK'920 -0343 MARILYN WOOLDRIDGE EDINA PARK BOARD HOME929 -4356 6021 ARBOUR LN (36) WORK 854 -7777 DICK MAGUIRE EDINA GYMNASTICS ASSOCIATION HOME 922 -1510 4615 GOLF TERR. (24) WORKA 35 -6606 CRAIG SARNER EDINA HIGH SCHOOL COACHING STAFF HOME:432 -6548 6800 FRANCE AVE. SO. #178 (35) WORK:920 -0343 DICK BURMAN BRAEMAR CITY OF LAKES FIGURE HOME 941 -5961 SKATING CLUB WORK 861 -1622 69.17 VALLEY VIEW RD. (35) JOHN KEPRIOS EDINA PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT HOME 452 -2536 4801 W. 50TH ST. (24) WORK 927 -8861 NOEL RAHN EDINA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION HOME 941 -8675 7119 ANTRIM COURT (35) WORK 371 -7850 BOB O'CONNOR AHAUS AND HOCKEY SCHOOLS HOME 941 -8454 7101 LANHAM LN (35) WORK 941 -8454 BOB KOJETIN EDINA PARK & RECREATION DEPARTMENT HOME 929 -8889 4801 W. 50TH ST. (24) WORK -927 -8861 SKIP LEFLER EDINA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION HOME 929 -6635 4379 MACKEY AVE. (16) WORK 333 -0543 JOHN JUSTICE SPECIAL PROJECTS HOME 920 -0159 5109 48THST. W. (36) WORK 890 -8940 ART KATZMAN EDINA GYMNASTICS ASSOCIATION HOME 929 -7561 4920 DALE DRIVE (24) WORK 348 -5987 LARRY THAYER BRAEMAR ARENA MANAGER HOME 926 -3219 7501 COUNTY RD. 18 (35) WORK 941 -1322 BRAEMAR SPORTS COMPLEX 1986 PROBLEM I The Pavilion is in need of significant repair and needs an overall facelift to bring it up to fire codes, spectator, and participant require- ments. PROBLEM II At the same time, the Edina Gymnastics Association is in severe need of a permanent home; the present facility is inadequate and will eventu- ally be used again by the school system for expansion. PROBLEM III The Gymnastics Association and the Hockey Association are both in a growth posture; by 1990 both Associations will expand by 50%. PROBLEM IV During the past few years, there has been a great deal of pressure on the Braemar Arena and Pavilion during the hockey season for prime time indoor ice. The Edina Hockey Program purchased over 400 hours of addi- tional indoor ice at rinks in other communities. PROBLEM V The expansion of the pre - school age population will put pressure on the school board to expand and consider elimination of some school athletic facilities, specifically gymnasium floors. PROBLEM VI Participation in hockey, gymnastics, figure skating, soccer, base- ball, weight training and conditioning will require an indoor multiple use complex. PROBLEM VII Adult Sport and Recreational Activities such as volleyball, hockey, and gymnastics, have not been available on an organized level. PROBLEM VIII Additional Recreational Activities need to be fostered and organ- ized to meet the growing needs of Edina. OBSERVATION I Sports and Recreation are alive and well in Edina because of the broad base of participation and volunteer support at all levels. OBSERVATION II Our High School has produced many talented athletes who were able to grow and develop through various park and recreation activities. OBSERVATION IIIEdina is a "Destination Community ". Most families start out some- where else and just prior to the children starting school, find their way to Edina. OBSERVATION IV Edina has provided the family with Academic, Economic, Cultural and Athletic opportunities which have been second to none. OBSERVATION V We have always strived to provide the best possible facilities and yet at the same time maintain high Economic and Fiscal responsiblity. i Page - 2 OBJECTIVE I Build a new permanent home for the Gymnastics Program. A first class facility will not only benefit the gymnastics program but also all athletes throughout Edina. Included in the facility will be an indoor running track, a weight training and conditioning program as well as the best available gymnastics equipment. OBJECTIVE II Replace the current pavilion with a new olympic size hockey rink which will be a year around facility. This new rink will not only provide a greater use of Braemar ice but also help us attract national, 'state and regional events which will help pay for the development of the facility. OBJECTIVE III Develop and indoor soccer league, a volleyball association, an indoor basketball program, an adult hockey league, a junior hockey program, a facility for public meetings, dances and small conventions. OBJECTIVE IV Bring the U.S. Olympic team to Braemar. We would have a total facility for the hockey program including weight training, dry land train- ing, central location, easy access by plane and freeways. We have already begun the ground work to accomplish this objective. OBJECTIVE V Develop the southwest part of Edina and the Normandale area of Bloomington into an Olympic quality training facility. A committee is currently working very hard to develop the Normandale Ski Jump to Olympic specifications; another committee is working to develop an Olympic Swim- ming and Diving facility at Normandale Junior College. With the addition of an Olympic Ice Arena in this area, it would not be unreasonable to rethink the Speedskating concept at some future time. OBJECTIVE VI Provide the children of Edina with a reasonable lifestyle and an opportunity in life through a high quality education and recreational ex- perience. OBJECTIVE VII Re -vamp the Pavilion to achieve its original purpose - an ice surface in the fall and winter and a multiple use recreational facility in spring and summer, specifically a portable gym floor. OBSTACLE I Financing the project requires approximately $3,000,000. The current revenue sources of the Arena and Pavilion plus the addition of the Gymnastics Association will not cover the obligations of a net revenue bond. Gross Revenue Bonds will meet the cash flow requirements of a revenue bond, but the City's general revenues would have to cover the operating short -fall of approximately $39,000 annually. OBSTACLE II General Obligation Bonds would put additional burdens on the general population. Incentives to develop Braemar to its financial po- tential would be marginal. Page - 3 OPPORTUNITY & RECOMMENDATION I Use Gross Revenue Bonds to fund the Braemar Sports Complex. Continue the Braemar Sports Complex Committee with the specific purpose of generating, promoting private donations, as well as coodinating an annual fundraiser to create a source of money to cover operational shortfalls. This committee would also be commissioned to work with the Park and Recreation Department in expanding, attracting, and de- veloping additional functions and activities for the Braemar Sports Complex. OPPORTUNITY II With interest rates lower, inflation lower coupled with the broad base of support that we see for this project, we feel that now is the time to move forward and develop this project to its potential. EDINA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION 4801 WEST 501h STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 OFFICERS BOARD President Dennis Cain Reid Evenson. [MINNESOTA(. John Morton Vice President Dan Carsello Ed hIowat Paul Sanderson Secretary John Anzevino Joann Cronin Bill Johnson Treasurer, A Jack Genung Bob Busch Jim Viera Past President Noel Rahn PROPOSED RENEWAL OF THE BRAEMAR ARENA AND PAVILION COMPLEX SEPTEMBER 17.1985 Edina has traditionally been a Minnesota and our city leaders the community as a whole. The its volunteer associations and hand with the city leaders. Ei ocuses on the adult needs but rental needs -of the children. front runner in hockey in the State of have always reso� Winded to the needs of strength.of this community comes from other citizen ❑0ouos working hand ire Dina is not only a community which also on the educational and develoo- Today, we have a unique opportunity to bring together several circum- stances that can provide a significant improvement in the physical development of the Braemar Arena comalex. It has came to our atten- tion that the floor- of the pavilion is in need of total reoair and that the cast of this project is approximately $300,000. We are also aware that the Gymnastic Association of Edina is in need of a permanent home. In reviewing th_e hockey program in Edina, we have determined that over 675 hours of ice is being purchased by our coaches outside of Edina. Several other items which will be outlined below, have led us to the conclusion that we convert the pavilion to a year around athletic facility which includes a gymnasium for the Gymnastic Association, a weight training center, perhaps even an indoor running track, and a storage facility for the Park. and Recreation Deoartment. In addition we are proposing a new indoor skating rink be constructed immediately south of the pavilion to reolace the current pavilion skating rink, and also we would recommend a new covered natural ice facility immediately to the south of the new oroposed rink. Following is a list of the circumstances that have led us to believe that the above action is appropriate and necessary: - the reoairs to the current pavilion are 90ing tO cost more than the original cost to construct the oav i l i on. it is less exoensive to convert the pavilion to a gymnasium facitity V since the current floor could be used. - since Braemar is considered the soorts center in Edina, it seems reasonable to have the Gymnastic Association located at Braernar. - with the expansion of the hockey program, late hours of skating has become a greater problem for %our high school age players and if we could provide more local ice, we could at least cut down on the travel time to and from rinks. - since the high school schedule has been revised, the figure skating program has lost approximately 50 prune time hours of ice. - in 1968, 450 boys were involved in the hockey program; today we have over 850 participants. In 1968, 386 hours of ice was purchased by the Edina Hockey Associationiat Braemar and approximately 200 hours was prchased elsewhere; today the Edina Hockey Association is pur- chasing 1360 hours. of ice at Braemar and over 675 hours of ice outside of Edina. - this year the Edina Hockey Association has donated $15000 to the Park Department for the purpose of installing new lighting for the Arena and other mutually agreeable projects. - at -the present time the Edina Hockey Association is willing to commit $709000 to the development of the above project and would be willing to cornrnit its .fundraising efforts to this project also. - Since the bonds on the current Braemar Complex are close to retirement, this would be an extremely opportune time. to consider the above project. - girls hockey is crowing rapidly and currently there area teams in the Twin Cities and two of these teams are from Edina. ­indoor soccer is expandinq rapidly in the state and eventually the needs of this program will have to be addressed. - with the addition of a running track, many people who otherwise out back on -their exercise during the cold weather, could maintain a year around program. , - the physical strength of our athletes depends on good conditioning, and a well supervised training program could help our children develope 000d habits which will last a lifetime- - the new covered natural ice rink could be better maintained than ether a1_ttside ice facilities because of its l0cat i . and we feel that this rink could replace some of the other outdoor facilities as long as we identify four key rinks in Edina that can be well maintained. This could alleviate some of the current problems with maintainence while at the same time providing as many people as possible art 0000r- tunity to play hockey and skate outside. We feel that there is wide community support for this project, especially from the Edina Hockey Association, the Gymnastic Association, The Hockey t. Iris, and the Park. and Recreation Department. We ar-e wi 1 l i np t� � support this project with both our voluntary efforts and financial support. Thank you fl_-r your time and .considerat'ion. Respectfully,submitted, Ed Howat Vice - President Edina Hockey Association 4. A. Indoor Ice Activities #1 Hockey (includes games, practices, tournaments, schools and clinics (both equal) #1 Figure Skating (includes lessons, shows, and competitions) #2 Open Skating #3 'Broomball 4�4 Olympic Training Center #5 Speed "Skating B. 'Dry -Land Indoor Activities 4�1 Scheduled.athletic sport activities *Soccer *Football (toch & flag) *Tennis *Roller-blade hockey *Volleyball *Aerobics classes 'Basketball .#2 Shows *Dog Shows *Flea Markets *Gun Shows. *Trade Shows #3 Weight Room /Training Room *Nautilus equipment,& jogging *Stationary bicycles, etc. #4 Social Events *Picnics *Parties /receptions *Social gatherings *Dances *Teen Center #5 Miscellaneous Needs *Meeting rooms *Showers *Spectator Space *Equipment storage space *Pleasing aesthetics (murals, etc.) BRAEMAR SPORTS COMPLEX SURVEY FORM SUMMARY IE/1/85 THE CITY OF EDINA AND THE CURRENT USERS OF THE BRAEMAR ARENA AND PAVILION FACILITY ARE CURRENTLY IN THE PROCESS OF STUDYING THE POSSIBILITY OF REMODELING AND IMPROVING THE FACILITY. IN ORDER TO BETTER UNDERSTAND THE NEEDS OF THE COMMUNITY, WE ARE ASKING YOU TO TAKE A FEW MINUTES TO GIVE. US YOUR OPINION AND VIEWS ABOUT THE BRAEMAR ARENA AND PAVILION, AND WHAT YOU SEE AS OUR FUTURE NEEDS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR RESPONSE, IT IS GREATLY APPRECIATED. WHAT DO YOU LIKE MOST ABOUT THE CURRENT FACILITY? RINKS; AVAILABILITY OF LOTS OF ICE FOR KIDS; CLEAN; GOOD VIEWING FOR FANS; GOOD ICE; LIGHTING; LOCATION; DRESSING ROOMS; COMFORTABLE TEMPER- ATURE -WISE; GOOD CONDITION: GOOD STAFF; WHAT -DO YOU LIKE THE LEAST% POOR REST ROOMS; ACCESS TO LOWER LEVEL; LOCKER ROOMS; PAVILION IS A POOR FACILITY; QUALITY PROBLEMS OF THE PAVILION; ICE PROBLEM IN PAVIL- ION IS NOT SOLVED; LOCKER ROOMS TOO SMALL: ACCESS IN AND OUT OF LOCKER ROOMS POOR WHEN GAMES ARE SCHEDULED; PLAYERS BOXES TOO SMALL; BLEACHERS IN PAVILION ARE IN NEED OF REPAIR; PAVILION PARKING; POOR VF_NDING AREA IN BOTH RINKS; ROADS'TO RINK NEED DIFFERENT APPROFICH; EASIER ACCESS TO-BOTH RINKS; SECURITY. IN LOCKER ROOMS: BARN -LIKE ATMOSPHERE IN THE PAVILION; SOUND - PROOFING BETWEEN LOCKER ROOMS; ACCESS TO ARENA LOCKER ROOMS AT ALL TIMES FROM PAV.' IN YOUR OPINION, WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO HAVE DIFFERENT IN A NEW FACILITY? LARGER LOCKER ROOMS, BETTER REST ROOM FACILITIES; BETTER ACCESS TO CON- CESSIONS; LOOK INTO ARTIFICIAL ICE FACILITY; - RELIABILITY OF GETTING ICE IN THE FALL; BALCONY VIEWING; ENCLOSED MEZZANINE WITH CONCESSIONS; COACH'S ROOM; MEETING ROOMS; TRAINING FACILITY FOR CONDITIONING,; LARGER EVERYTHING; HAVE A CONCESSION STAND LIKE EDEN PRAIRIE; HAVE A SHOP THAT SELLS BASIC ITEMS FOR HOCKEY; HAVE STAFF THAT MORE AVAILABLE; BETTER SECURITY; TEAM MEETING ROOMS; MORE COMPLETE FACILITY LIKE EDEN PRAIRIE; NEED MORE PRACTICE TIME ON WEEKENDS; REFEREE DRESSING ROOM FOR BOTH RINKS; WARMER; ADJACENT OUTSIDE ICE; KEEP TEMPERATURE DOWN TO SAVE COST OF HEATING; 2 YEAR AROUND FACILITIES; CHECK NEW HOPE GREAT FACILITY FOR MEETINGS, PARTIES GROUPS; DO IT RIGHT, DON'T CUT CORNE=RS, COMMENTS Page 2 BANTAMS It's badly needed and will be used beyond your beliefs. TRAVELING TEAMS Necessary improvement if Edina wants to return to dominance in the sport. Other communities have more ice hours -per team because of lower enrollments and less time conflicts. We need it badly. My only concern is that a majority of my team did not show up for games. Practicesthat were later than 10 p.m. If the reason Juvenile teams are using non prime hours is due to lack of prime hours in Arena and Pavilion I would say yes, you would need.a 3rd sheet of ice. You,would get better cooperation from both players and parents of older divisions. Need more ice for practice. Should practice 1z hours instead of 1 hour- - far more productive. Vital towards maintaining an attractive program for our kids and their parents in terms of indoor ice vs. outdoor, appropriate times of day (8 p.m. vs. 10:30 p.m.), and drive time (It's insane to have to drive 45 minutes one -way for a practice- we had to).' If a 3rd rink is built, some practice time can be increased to 14 or 1z hours (If the city is concerned with not selling enough ice time). It would never be un -used. Very necessary. I believe we could use the additional sheet of ice. Not only would it provide Edina teams with more hours, but more desirable times. This would probably help the Midgets and Juveniles even more so than the Bantams. It would definitely be an asset to participation and development of youth hockey and skating. I feel the ice demand in this community warrents another rink. Also, I feel the gymnastic facility is sorely needed. Would be great. I think we can use up the ice. If not,the outside teams would certainly fill up the time. We certainly need it. Not Necessary! Repair Pavilion Ice Equipment. Enlarge dressing rooms at far end, install new Infra Red Heat above bleachers and players boxes. An absolute need. You can accomplish more in one hour of indoor practice than you can in 3 hours outdoors. COMMENTS - -- ANSWERS TO QUESTION 5 MITE INSTRUCTIONAL The decision should be based on cost and demographics as well as what outdoor alternatives are available. Is it possible to cover an out - door rink to make maintenance easier? Are theremore or less kids entering the hockey programs? If there are more, how long will the numbers continue to increase? Let's not do another Edina West High School mistake. I feel a 3rd rink could easily be filled up. It is impossible to get Ice time during the season before 11 p.m. at night. MITE WHITE Definite Need. I would organize a pick -up game for Mites each week through the summer, if'we could get ice. There would also be great interest in an adult league. More indoor ice would be great. However, without knowing the potential cost, I can't sayIwhether I would be for or against. MITE GREEN The Mite level and house teams on the older levels need more indoor ice. Unless a player is on a traveling team he doesn't get indoor ice. Edina could definately use another ice rink. I think more ice time in Edina for Mite Teams is an absolute must. There is a terrible shortage in October - December and the end of Jan. We played 3 games by Feb. 14th. Outdoor ice was unattended on Feb.28th. .Need more. ice! I believe it would be great. Fine - what's it cost? SQUIRTS - Great idea! Edina is number 1 in hockey. Kids need more ice time in younger years. I live in Bloomington and come back to Edina to coach because I think Edina Hockey is the greatest. Very much in favor of the idea, especially if the "house" (C Level) teams'receive a fair allocation of the.additional available ice. Edina needs one. Would like to see it. The ice will get used in the winter time. Edina could put together a Spring, Summer and Fall hocks league to make sure the ice gets used. I think it would be great for the Edina Hockey Association. PEE WEE E.H., CITY LEAGUE NA = Not Applicable 6 MITE GREEN DIVISION 6 Question 414 #Teams League #Teams Question Avg. Question Avg. Question Avg. Yes_ No_ #if yes Avg. Responding 411 per 412 per - 413 per per team team team team 2 MITE INSTRUCTIONAL' 2 NA, NA NA NA 23 11.5 1 1 10 5 6 MITE GREEN DIVISION 6 40 6.6 36 6 107 17.8 5 1 38 5.3 199 (1/2 ICE) 434 17 4 207 /TEAMS E.H.A. 4 MITE WHITE DIVISION 4 NA NA NA NA 59 14.75 2 2 29 7.25 16 2 0 22 11 4 PEE WEES 2 86 21.5 56' 14 26 6.5 6 SQUIRTS 6 72 12 44 7.3 85 14.1 6 0 90 15 '73 14.6 4 MIDGETS 4 79 19.75 56 14 30 7.5 4 0 60 5 PEE WEES 1 35 7 30 6.0 100 20 1 0 5 5 4 BANTAMS 2 52 13 36 9 60 15 2 0 35 17.5 TOTALS 199 146 434 17 4 207 /TEAMS E.H.A. TRAVELING LEAGUE . 3 SQUIRTS 2 51 17 37 12.3 48 16 2 0 22 11 4 PEE WEES 2 86 21.5 56' 14 26 6.5 2 0 18 9 5 BANTAMS 5 83 16.6 53 10.6 41 8.2 5 0 '73 14.6 4 MIDGETS 4 79 19.75 56 14 30 7.5 4 0 60 15 3 JUVENILES 1 6 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 6 1 JR. B.(Estimated) 0 10 10 9 9 0 0 0 0 10 10 TOTALS 315 211 145 14 0 189 March, 1986 Dear Hockey Coach: The Braemar Sports Complex feasibility committee is working hard to determine the feasibility of building a new blympic size indoor hockey /skating arena and a new gymnastics facility. To assess the demand for more ice time in Edina, we are requesting that you answer the following questions and return this letter in the enclosed self- addressed stamped envelope. Please answer the questions as accurately as possible and return as soon as possible. This is vitally important information for the committee and your cooperation is greatly appreciated. 1. How many additional indoor ice hours did your team purchase and use above and beyond the ice time that the Edina Hockey Association initially allocated and scheduled for the team? (The E.H.A. ice auction hours are to be considered part of these additional hours.) hours of ice. 2. Of these additional indoor ice hours, how many were not .Edina Braemar Arena or Pavilion ice hours? hours of ice. 3. How many hours of outdoor rink ice at Edina's local parks were used by your team this past hockey season? hours or ice. 4., Would your team have used more indoor ice this past season if more prime time ice hours were available at Braemar? __.yes no If yes, approximately how many? hours of ice. 5. .Lastly, please give us your comments regarding the possibility of a third indoor ice rink at Braemar. COMMENTS: Team Name and Age Division Thank you very much -for your cooperation. Sincerely, Firector, Jo KepriAssistant Edina Park and Recreation Department JK /ss SURVEY FINDINGS For the 1985 -86 hockey season, Edina hockey teams purchased an estimated 514 additional ice hours beyond their allocated schedule. Of those 514 ice hours, 357 hours were purchased at arenas outside Edina, which is 69.57 of all additional ice hours purchased. An estimated 579 outdoor rink ice hours were used by Edina hockey teams. Of these 579 hours, 434 (757) were used by the 27 City.League teams and 145 (257) were used by the 20 Traveling League teams. Of the 35 responding teams, 31 teams (897) claimed that they would have used more ice at Braemar had it been available. The only 4 teams that answered no to that question were all mite teams (6 -8 yr. olds) 35 of the 47 teams responded to the survey and of those 35, they would have desired an additional 396 ice hours at Braemar, which is 11.3 hours per team. An average of 11.3 hours times the current 47 teams equals an estimated 531 additional hours at Braemar that were not available. There are an "average of 50 hours of prime time ice available to the hockey association per week. In accordance with school projections, the Edina Hockey Association is projecting an increase in registrants from 800 to 1,100 in less than 10 years (an increase of•37.57). To simply meet the existing demands for indoor ice, a new sheet of indoor ice, which would provide for roughly 44 prime time ice hours per week, would be needed for over 12 weeks. With an increase of 37.57 in less than 10 years, a third rink would be filled for the entire five month hockey season. This increase in demand for indoor ice does not include the.future demand for figure skating, open skating, adult hockey, speed skating, rink bandy or any other additional demands on ice time. BRAEMAR SPORTS COMPLEX Sub - Committe Report: Outline of Community Needs John Justice, Chairman Dick Maguire Craig Sorner Marilyn Wooldridge This was a brainstorming session to determine various ways that the com- munity can apply their current needs to the proposed Braemar facility. I. Athletic /Recreational Uses - in addition to gymnastics, figure skating, . and hockey. A. Indoor Soccer B. Cross country headquarters 1. Running 2. Skiing C. Sports Camps 1. - Market the facility (through nearby colleges) to hold their camps here. D. Sports Medicine Concept 1. U. of M. /internships E. Health, Fitness, Wellness Seminars II. Non - Athletic /Miscellaneous uses. A. Fund- raising gatherings B. Art Shows C. Bazaars D. Fairs E. Festivals F. Senior Citizens Activities G. College Fair for the Lake Conference H. Fire /Safety Demonstrations and Exhibits 1. Edina Fire Dept. 2. Edina Police Dept. I. Adult Education 1. Market their business 2. They can fill daytime hours J. Town Hall - Polling Concept K. Business Purposes 1. Small trade shows L. Churches 1. Game nights 2. Bazaars M. Teen Center and /or School Activity 1. Movie Night 2. Dance 3. Shuttle bus from Braemar to football games and back to Braemar. TO: STUDY COMMITTEE FROM: EDINA GYMNASTICS ASSOCIATION (EGA) Dick Maguire, Co- President RE: REPORT ON GYMNASTICS UTILIZATION for BRAEMAR SPORTS COMPLEX FEASIBILITY STUDY DATE: May 5, 1986 PURPOSE OF REPORT This report reviews and highlights the need for and viability of a new Gymnastics Facility in Edina. It also considers implications to Edina of continuing the Edina Gymnastics Association program "as is" in the face of present and anticipated near -term forces impacting the program's performance and facilities. Finally, the report points out the positive benefits to the program and to Edina of creating a new, safe, contemporary and comprehensive facility which will serve as a "Home" for the total EGA Progressive Curriculum System. This is a twelve- month -a -year program, one that requires dedicated facilities. EGA UTILIZATION STUDY KEY FINDINGS Present program has overtaxed available facilities, creating situations in which: 1. overcrowding occurs, increasing potential for injury 2. further growth in program is forestalled 3. continued advancement is not possible for better or bigger gymnasts - space and ceiling heights are too limited 4. lack of sanitary facilities has already led to specific incidents of trauma for child pupils While parents and children are enthusiastic and positive about program, dissatisfaction with Weber facility is deep and growing. EGA will be unable to keep up with enrollment increases if program stays-"as is ", in fact Edina School Board anticipates removing EGA from East Hut by 1986/87; no satisfactory alternative facility is available through the School Board or Park District on a twelve month basis. EGA's class and team program can grow 50 - 60% over the next two years with construction of an 189000 - 24,000 square foot gymnastics facility. 1 narxr.RnTTNn EGA was formed in 1970 and has been part of the Edina Community ever since. While it has gone through several organizational changes, EGA has always has a relationship with and sponsorship by the Edina Park and Recreation Department. EGA has always been a rootless, "gypsy" club; it has never had a specific and true "home" facility. It has met at one time or another at Edina West H.S., Weber Park, diverse community churches, at the Wooddale, Cornelia, Countryside Schools, the East Hut at the Community Center and so on. EGA reaffirmed its Edina Identity in 1984, returning (from K.E.G.A) to the Edina Gymnastics Association name and symbol from its early years. The club is a non - profit, Minnesota corporation, governed by an eleven member Board of Directors. The current Board is shown on Exhibit I. These are volunteer positions. The EGA Program is directed by Executive Director and Head Coach, Peggy Fifield. Her staff includes a Boys Team Coach and thirteen other class and team coaches. All are paid competitively. The Edina City Council and the Edina Park Board have been supportive of the program since summer 1984, and the club, which had been in a downturn form 1981 -84, has thrived as 'shown below. ti J s 2 EGA PRESENT STATUS UT11VT Trvme 1. Healthy growing program - boys and girls classes and teams. Enrollments shown below: Spring 1984 200 Students Spring 1985 360 Students Spring 1986 530 Students Change +330 Students or + 1657 2. Well supervised, technically sound, caring program. 3. Program is highly regarded by Edina parents. 4. EGA is financially healthy,, repaying Edina City Council Loan on schedule (to be repaid in full by June 1987). It is important to point out that the growth in enrollment has come primarily from the pre - school and beginner classes with the highest percentage growth occurring in the boys' classes. ENROLLMENT: WINTER /SPRING 1986 GIRLS BOYS TOTAL Pre- School (incl. Kids Club) 138 21 159 Progressive Classes 226 90 316 Competitive Teams 41 14 55 TOTAL 405 125 530 Present Facilities Currently, EGA operates in two separate facilities, Weber Park Warming Hut /Garage adn the East Hut at the Community Center; each has specific limitations. This report will discuss those problems and limitations shortly, but they may be summarized as follows: KEY PROBLEMS /CONCERNS 1. Student safety and security are continuing concerns. 2. Present Facilities are inadequate: a. Further program growth not possible b. Proper training - top gymnasts - not possible 3. Major facility (Hut) unavailable until 5:30 pm, unavailable at all after June 1987. 3 Discussion of Present Facilities Facility Weber Park Warming Hut /Garage East Hut - Community Center Additional Factors to Consider Major Limitations /Concerns 1. Too small for more than 21 students at one time. 2. Too small for students beyond advanced beginner level. 3. Space reduced by half during hockey season. 4. Facility cold and wet during winter. 5. Viewed as unsatisfactory by parents (489 of parents of current students, 639 of parents of former students). See Exhibit II for results of February Research Study. 6. Inefficient, cramped and potentially dangerous. 1. Has no toilet facilities, a major problem when team members spend 3 1/2 hours per day there and have to use bathrooms within the Community Center. 2. Police have documented incidents of a sexual nature at the Community Center. 3. Unavailable for EGA until 5:30 pm (Kids Club uses twice weekly at 4:00 pm). See Exhibit III for specific daily utilization of Weber and the Hut. 4. Ceilings are too low to permit essential training for bigger /high school boys on rings and high bar or Class I or II team girls. 5. No spectator space for parents. 6. Beginner gymnasts miss the motivational experience of seeing advanced girls train. 7. It is anticipated that the Edina School Board /Community Center will not renew EGA's lease of the Hut after the summer of 1987. 1. Safety is a key concern. Crowded, tight conditions are not conducive to optimum learning, no matter how many safety measures are observed. 2. Gymnastic students are generally young, ages 4 or 5 through 10 or 12 are critical years. Yet because of limited Hut availability, these young students are forced to train during evening hours. EGA believes 9:00 pm is the limit for team members; parents of class students resist strongly going beyond 6 or 7 o'clock. EGA does not have classes or practice on Sundays. 4 3. Promising gymnasts - like ballet students - require extensive coaching and practice time: 9 -15 hours per week. 4. Edina's gymnastic teams have been successful in recent years (e.g. EHS won state in Boys and Girls Gymnastics in 1984/85) and most received their early and /or continuing training via EGA. The deterioration of the EGA (then K.E.G.A.) program during 1981 - 1984 will penalize EHS teams until 1989 or beyond. 5. EGA teams give the beginning and improving gymnasts something to aspire to. Twenty girls recently tried out for four openings on the Girls Class III C Team. EGA offers: Girls Teams Boys Teams Class I Class II & Adv. Optional Class II - 1986/87 Class III C (compulsory) Class III Class IV Class IV ( "Prep" Teams) ( "Prep" Teams) 6. While Edina children receive preference for classes over non - residents when registered on time (first come, first serve basis), there are only limited classes at the most popular times. Thus, some Edina children a) do not get into the most popular classes or b) are put on the waiting lists if parents delay in registering them. Hours of Gymnastics Instruction Class Hours Per Week: At Weber 30.0 Hours At Hut 12.0 Hours Team Hours Per Week (at Hut): Boys 9.0 Hours Girls 19.5 Hours NOTE: These numbers are provided for guidance only: totals are not directly comparable. For example, one class at the Hut might be able to handle 40 students; one hour at Weber cannot handle more that 21 students (7 during skating season). See Exhibit III for actual hourly utilization by classes and teams. OUTLOOK FOR FUTURE - PROJECTIONS EGA's financial health is sound, a result of the enrollment growth noted earlier. Unfortunately, significant further growth - which is attainable if larger, more suitable facilities are available - is not possible in EGA's current physical set -up. Worse, growing dissatisfaction with Weber Park and the absence of a viable alternative to the East Hut make even maintenance of the present program problematic. The EGA Program will show continuing growth, health and vitality if the new gymnastics portion of the Braemar Sports Complex is authorized and constructed during 1986/87. 5 PROJECTIONS WITH NEW BRAEMAR FACILITY 1. Enrollment increases are possible: Spring 1986 530 Spring 1986 800 - 850 Change 270 - 320 or 50% - 60% from higher base 2. Increased operating revenue, net of salaries, of $50,000. 3. Will make possible complete, comprehensive and progressive programs for girls and boys. 4. Single major facility will provide beginners with strong role models and reinforcement. 5. EGA can host regional /national competitions Basis for Projections The EGA Director and Head Coach and the EGA Treasurer and Registrar prepared detailed class projections by class type, day and session. They calculated that enrollment growth would occur during each of EGA's Fall, Winter /Spring, and Summer sessions. INCREASE IN CLASS ENROLLMENT Fall and Winter /Spring: Two 16 week sessions Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Total Pre - Schoolers 42 56 42 56 203 Classes - Girls & Boys 16 14 21 48 32 131 Boys Team -- -- -- 20 -- 20 Total Increase 58 70 70 124 32 354 Summer: One 10 week session 100 Gymnasts - one hour /week 40 High School Gymnasts (out of season) - six hours /week Financial Implications EGA estimates that the above net increases in enrollment will generate net income of $50,000 per year. If new facilities are completed by June 1987, this $50,000 net income could be earned during the fiscal year 1987 -1988. Rationale for Projections 1. The primary grades will be growing in Edina Year No. Students 1986/87 2467 1987/88 2582 1988/89 2791 1989/90 2974 1990/91 3135 2. The Southdale YMCA is discontinuing its gymnastics program (80 -100 gymnasts) effective summer of 1986 3. Class IV teams in Minnesota - the lowest and youngest competitive teams are growing dramatically. Girls Boys 1985/86 400 105 1984/85 180 60 Increase +220 +45 or 120% or 75% 4. Unlike earlier years, gymnastics did not rise and then fall after the Olympics; it has continued to rise. The 1988 Olympics, coupled with extensive television coverage will generate further interest in the sport which is recognized for its benefits to kids. 7 EDINA GYMNASTICS ASSOCIATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS FEBRURARY 1986 EXHIBIT I Lizz& Fred Eiselein 925-1363 5404 Chantrey Road Edina, Minnesota 55436 (Greg-- Boys IV Team) (Peggy Fifield,'Executive Director & Head Coach), ex officio 920 -6929 4010 Wooddale Avenue South St. Louis Park, MN 55416 (Erin -- Intermediate) Mauraen & Lowell Green 941-1634 9935 Friar Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 553+4 (Melissa -- Class II: Annemarie-- Int. Optional; Robbie -- Boys IV Team:) (Maleah -- Beginner; Ryan-- Mite) Stevie & Dick Grussendorf 933-2342 6101 Kaymar Drive Edina, Minnesota 55436 (Blake -- Boys IV. Team) Pam & Art Katzman 929-7561 4920 Dale Drive Edina, Minnesota 55424 (Jessie - -Boys III Team) Meg & Jeffrey Keyes 922-3455 4626 Arden Avenue Edina, Minnesota 55424 (Anne -- .Intermediate; Kerry -- Mite II) Pam & Dennis Leese 920 -307 4519 Edina Boulevard Edina, Minnesota 55424 (Mardi -- Advanced Beginner) -2- Anne & Dick Maguire 922_1510 4615 Golf Terrace Edina, Minnesota 55424 (Jane -- Int. Optional) Marilyn & Jack rlurphy 929 -0039 6064 Olinger Circle Edina, Minnesota 55436 (Tim -- Boys Intermediate; Katie -- Advanced Beginner) Cindy & Lee Frewitt 920 -1447 5128 Mirror Lakes Drive Edina, Minnesota 55436 .(Jenna -- Comet) Gail P Jim Watson 927-66U6 5116 priest 40th Street St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 (Cheryl -- Advanced Beginner) Nancy & Richard. Myatt 920-6561 5645 11ood.dale Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 55'24 (Brian -- Boys Intermediate) Maguire Marketing consulting research analysis SUMMARY OF FINDINGS EGA RESEARCH Conducted Feb. 1986 1. Parents are enthused, not apathetic: § 40% Response Rate to Survey /Questionnaire EXHIBIT II April 25, 1986 § Many, many comments were provided (a compendium of all comments from the first 100 questionnaires received is available for review upon request, excluding those comments which could /might divulge the identity of the respondent). 2. The overall impression of the program is very positive: § 80% of parents of current and former students rate it excellent or very good (86% of parents of current pupils) § 17% rate it good § 3% race it weak or disappointing 3. The most negative responses came with regard to facilities, particularly Weber Park (48% of parents with children currently enrolled, 63% of parents with children no longer enrolled, were very negative) 4. An area requiring continued emphasis is communication 5. Most parents have no idea whether the Community is supportive: § Yes 14% § No 14% § Don't Know 72% 100% 0 7300 France Avenue South Suite 321 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 ■ (612) 835 -6606 C/-,Os 5140cle009'r I VAI ti✓Iwt�l� /lPRl�v� '�� cy��Ox�N �v�2r;�R�r l��Rvc�rD C� ✓�. '�s,� S V gym. C hq S V4 ve / /fit MAt V 3/1 /) x2r I 3 It i 8'7 y7 7 No r G o v *wa 213 .�" � 2 C 'Zo cii 2y3. qo 000 AEXGeLCEN% VEeq y (!1;000*6 3` GOOD VE4 k .� / S�pop' CIAO o'% MEAN E FitRottce �aRo� e 33 9 27 5-3 I3 Z9 17 /00 /•83 6 2 /00. 2.37 z /00 1175 �i.srEe #• z z rep's SAG' /[ /rigs EiY R oLtFD h�UT bv_ �QgR 2Y % 3/ zs IN 2 - � 1600 I 27 2Y 2Y /00 yr w_ �lisR 27 2y 29 io �o /oo No Zy 1y 3 X00 To rW"t V 7 I 4 26 26 3 2q "I Z7 /0 0 1490 MEAN SCORE ( #1 = tops to #5 = worst) POSITIVE RATING (% rating 1 or 2) NEUTRAL (rated 3) 2-41 NEGATIVE (% rated 4 or 5) KEY: E = children _ enrolled currently F = children enrolled formerly I E S . ?l M a H M tl EGA RESEARCH STUDY KEY ATTRIBUTES RATED PER CENT M RATING _ - -_ -_ RATED ( #5 = Worst up to #1 = Tops) MEAN ATTRIBUTE - __#5 _. - _ : #4 #3 #2 #1 RATING E Enjoyable - 1 4 26 69 1.37 F Program 2 7 18 48 27 2.11 - STAFF IS: E Involved F it E Positive F " E Equipment F If E Communication F " E Curriculum F " E Development F " FACILITIES: - 4 7 31 58 1.62 - 6 15 48 31 1.96 - 4 10 28 58 1.64 2 10 11 44 33 1.94 - 5 11 49 35 1.85 - 7 39 26 28 2.24 3 3 26 40 28 2.13 4 12 33 33 18 2.51 - 4 11 43 42 1.78 2 11 28 44 15 2.41 1 2 8 40 49 1.66 4 8 28 37 23 2.31 E Hut 2 14 25 31 28 2.32 F if 10 10 29 24 27 2.55 E Weber Park 24 24 27 18 7 3.40 F it 39 24 24 8 5 3.81 Note: Percentage distributions based on all respondents rating that attribute KEY: E = Respondents have children enrolled currently F = Respondents had children enrolled formerly e a %�., T A0 February 14, 1986 Edina Gymnastics Association 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Gymnastics Parent(s): The Board of Directors of Edina Gymnastics Association (EGA) is pleased to welcome your child(ren) to EGA's Winter /Sparing 186 Program. Many EGA "graduates" have earned distinction as gym- nasts at USGF, high school and college levels. Our Boys and Girls Class and Team Programs were revitalized in the fall of 1984 when Peggy Fifield joined EGA as Directo=r and Head Coach. Enrollment has been growing ever since and strands currently at 515 students. We are pleased by this growth but believe that little in life, not even EGA, is perfect. We need your input to assist us in: § Insuring that EGA meets the safety, supervision and coaching requirements of its students § Identifying aspects of the program which are excellent and should be expanded § Providing up -to -date, appropriate facilities for class and team training § Identifying and improving what needs to be improved § Planning for future growth; the elementary school population is rising in Edina We need your help now. Please take five minutes now to complete and return the attached, confidential and anonymous research questionnaire in the postage paid envelope provided. You may identify yourself, of course, if you wish a direct, personal response to your ideas and concerns. . A summary of findings will be made available to parents at the Hut/ Weber Park gymnastics facilities a6d will also be presented to the School Board, the Community Center Advisory Board, the Park & Rec Board and the City Council. Thank you for your.cooperation. Sincerely, EGA OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS Anne & Dick Maguire - Co -Pres. Pam & Dennis Leese Pam & Art Katzman - Co -VP's Marilyn & Jack Murphy Maureen & Lowell Green - Treas. /Registr. Cindy & Lee Prewitt Lizz & Fred Eiselein - Secretary Gail & Jim Watson Stevie & Dick Grussendorf Nancy & Rick Wyatt Meg & Jeff Keyes �r!lLr >t�.li�✓ F_/✓/QQLLF(� Edina Gymnastics Association 4801 West 50th Street I*- Edina, Minnesota 55424 February 14, 1986 Dear Parent(s): We, the Board of Directors of Edina Gymnastics (EGA):were disappointed to learn that your children) is not participating in EGA's Winter /Spring 86 Program. We recognize that there are many reasons why a parent or child may choose not to continue on in gymnastics, including conflicts with other activities, too many activities, expense,lack of interest, a desire to try something different, etc. :Nevertheless, we miss your child(ren). We need your input to assist us in: § Insuring that EGA meets the safety, supervision and coaching requirements of its students § Identifying aspects of the program which are excellent and should be expanded § Providing up -to -date, appropriate facili'ties for class and team training § Identifying and improving what needs to be improved § Planning for future growth; the elementary school population is rising in Edina We need your help now. Please take five minutes now to complete and return the attached, confidential and anonymous research questionnaire in the postage paid envelope provided. You may identify yourself, of course, if you wish a direct, personal response to your ideas and concerns. A summary of findings will be made available to parents at the Hut/ Weber Park gymnastics failities and will also be presented to the School Board, the Community Center Advisory Board, the Park & Rec Board and the City Council. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, EGA OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS Anne & Dick Maguire - Co -Pres. Pam & Art Katzman - Co -VP's Maureen & Lowell Green - Treas. /Registr. Lizz & Fred Eiselein - Secretary Stevie & Dick Grussendorf � v 7,.or I i 0 Pam & Dennis Leese Marilyn & Jack Murphy Cindy & Lee Prewitt Gail & Jim Watson Nancy & Rick Wyatt CONFIDENTIAL SURVEY for EDINA GYMNASTICS ASSOCIATION (one per family) 1. Total Number of Children in Family (check one) 2. Children Enrolled in EGA since July 1985 (please indicate place in family: #1 = oldest, etc.) 3. Current or Last EGA Class /Activity: (include Winter /Spring 186 activity, check as applicable) TEAM: Boys Girls CLASSES: Advanced Intermediate Advanced Beginr. Beginner Mites (girls 4 -6) Tots (3 years) CLASS LOCATIONS: "Hut" Weber Park 4. Is each child enrolled for Winter /Spring 186 Program? (check box for each child) 1 2 3 4 or more Child Child Child Child No. No. No. No. Y Y Y Y N N N N 5.-- Please provide your overall impression of the Edina Gymnastics Association (EGA) Program below. (check one) - Excellent program Very good, above average Good, can be improved Weak, needs improvement Disappointing, must be improved 6. Now, please tell us why you "graded" the EGA Program as you did in question #5. above. CONTINUED ON OTHER SIDE... 7. What do /did you like best about the program? S. How do you feel EGA's program can or should be improved? 9. If you child(ren) is no longer enrolled at EGA, is it because: My child(ren) gained what we wanted out of-gymnastics- Other activities precluded enrollment My child's taking time off - will return Other (please explain) 10. If you have younger children, do you plan to sign them up for gymnastics in the future? Yes If Yes, at EGA No or Other 11. Please evaluate the different elements of the EGA gymnastics program as follows: 01 = highest possible score, #5 = lowest possible). Add whatever comments you wish after completing the grading portion. (check one for each category's line). (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Enjoyable experience for Children Coaching Staff: Involved with Children Positive, caring attitude Facilities: Community Center "Hut" Weber Park Equipment Communications Between EGA and Parents Progressive Curriculum Developer of Child's Poise, Confidence, Strength and Coordination COMMENTS: (if any) (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) SIGNED: (Optional, complete only if contact desired): Phone No. The Edina Gymnastics Association has been part of Edina and Minne- sota Gymnastics since 1970. Do you feel it receives the support it merits from the Community? Yes No Don't Know THANK YOU FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE. PLEASE INSERT YOUR COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE IN THE PRE - ADDRESSED, STAMPED ENVELOPE AND MAIL IT TODAY. H MON U T W H TUE U T W H WED U T W H THU U T W H FRI U T W Exhibit III EGA FACILITIES USAGE BY DAY 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 HUT.UNAVAILABLE MAW =1 H SUN T N 0 T R A I N I N G W KC- KIDS CLUB OG- OPEN GYM BP - BIRTHDAY PARTIES KEY: Girls Teams Boys Teams Hut Classes Weber Classes Unscheduled HOURS /DAY 3.0 1.5 7.5 15.5 3.5 2.0 5.5 11.0 3.0 3.0 2.5 6.5 15.0 3.5 1.5 5.0 ItIx 3.0 1.5 2.0 6.5 5.5 3.5 + BP 3.5 12.5 FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR BRA -LAR SPORTS COMPLEX EDINA, MINNESOTA CaN. NO. 8526 MARCH 3,1986 •a•••aoilmen. DELANO ERICKSON ARCHITECTS 7415 WAYZATA BOULEVARD MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55426 (612) 544 -8370 INTRODUCTION Recognizing a need and an opportunity to provide for a. gymnastics program and additional ice skating facilities, this study has been undertaken by the Committee for a Braemar Sports Complex. The committee and the Park and Recreation Department has worked with the architect in the development of the study.. Beginning with two approaches - A - New gymnastics facility, and B - Remodel pavilion for gymnastics and build new olympic ice and natural ice. A third approach - C..- New gymnastics and olympic ice has been developed. Each of these approaches has been analyzed by the architect with accompanying design concepts and cost estimates. While first,cost is important, long range planning must take into account operating costs and maintenance. To:.this end-use of quality materials and energy efficient systems has been incorporated into cost estimates. Bremar Sports Complex Feasibility Committee Ed Howat Marilyn Wooldridge Dick ;Maguire Craig Sarner Dick Burman Doug Borth- -' Noel Rahn Bob O'Connor Skip Lefler John Justice Park and Recreation Department Larry Thayer John Keprios Bob Kojetin Architect Del Erickson -1- SITE ANALYSIS The following drawings, 1 and 2, illustrate the site impact of the two approaches to providing an addition to the Braemar Arena: Scheme C or A, shown on Drawing 1, has addition located in hillside and in front or south side of existing arena. This provides for two level access, a new front entrance or image to arena, and preserves service access to pavilion and complex without significant grading or retaining of steep hillside to east. Parking is expanded to south with new service road to Braemar Boulevard. Scheme B, shown on Drawing 2, has addition to east of existing arena and makes less impact on changing image of arena. While this approach preserves much of the existing parking area and has less building excavation, it will require significant alteration of hill to east and possibly retaining walls. Parking can be expanded to south and existing service drive to lower parking can remain. -2- ..OM- The three basic function areas to be provided in the expansion are 1. a gymnastics facility, 2. an olympic ice arena and 3. a natural ice /multi -use arena. These facilities are provided in:.different. combinations and layout under each of the three basic approaches. The following identifies the programmatic space requirements for each and projects approximate area of building. I GY'.VASTICS A. Provide large flexible gymnasium space with 20' ceiling height to acconmdate following gymnastic activities. Consideration for multi -use of space (ie basketball, volleyball, wrestling) should be given as well as providing flexibility of arranging apparatus for various activities, practice and events. 1. Floor Exercise 1 - 42 x 42 pad with walkway around. 2. Uneven bars 3 - 6' x 30' pads with space for guys and walkway. 3. Parellal bars 2 - 14' x 16' pads parellal. 1 - 10' x 16' pad for low bars. 4. Horizontal bar 1 - 8' x 36' pad with space for guys and walkway. 5. Pommel horse 1 - 12' x 12' pad plus walkway. 6. Rings 1 - 8' x 18' pad with space for.guys. Locate adjacent to pit. 7. Vaulting horse 1 - 6' x 18' pad plus 82' runway. 1- 82' x 6' runway to pit practice vault. 8. Balance beams 6 - High beams with 12' x 28' pad. 2 - Low beams with 8' x 28' pad. Total Net Apparatus Area 2,000 s.f. 540 s.f. 600 s.f. 300 s.f. 150 s.f. 150 s.f. 1,100 s.f. 2,500 s.f. 7,340 s.f. ..O B. Miscellaneous Areas These uses are not part of competition and can be in areas of multi -use or folding bleacher. 1. Preschool area 2,000 s.f. Include space for equipment such as beams, hoops, barrel, ladder, rebounder, etc. 2. Warm up area 1,000 s.f. Padded area adjacent to gymnastics. 3. Pit 600 s.f. . 6' deep soft pit in central location to receive various gymnasts on 3 or 4 sides. 4. Tumbling strip 400 s.f. 6' x 60.' pad adjacent to pit. 5. Trampolines 720 s.f. 2 large tramps and 1 mini tramp. 6. Weight and exercise area _ 13000 s.f. May be located at end of activity area or in lower ceiling support area - space for weight lifting, aerobics, exercize. i Total Net Activity Area 13,060 s.f. ' Projected size of gymnasium using a 40% add factor 18,000 s.f. to net areas for walkway and participants. C. Support Areas These spaces may be located in lower ceiling areas:adjacertt and I with easy access /visibility to gymnasium. 1. Offices 400 s.f. . Director, coaches & small reception area. 2. Meeting and AN room 500 s.f. Roan for films, video, training, teaching and meeting. Could be used by skating program also. Adjacent to judges area. 3. Locker Rooms 1,000 s.f. Two locker rooms with shower and toilet. -7- C. Support Areas cont. 4. Bleacher seating Combination of fixed and portable or movable to accommodate 300 to 1,000 spectators separated from gymnasts. Total Net Support Area Projected-Support Gross Area using a 30% add factor Total Projected Gymnastics Gross Area PROGRAM 5,00:0 to 2,000 s.f. 3,900 s.f. 5,000 s.f. 23,000.s.f. II OLYMPIC ICE ARENA Arena with small amount of-seating for practice, half ice games, olympic team training. Provide support areas and access to common public area and maintenance. A. Arena Rink 20,000 s.f. 100'x 200'ice sheet plus player boxes and penalty /timer box. B. Seating 3,000 s.f. Provide 500 to 700 seats with expansion thru use of portable or movable bleachers to 1,000 to 1,200. C. Team Rooms 1,200 s.f. Four separated team rooms paired to two shower toilet areas. Locate behind benches. D. Officials Room 80 s.f. E. First Aid Room 100 s.f. F. Press Area 500 s.f. Room for AN taping. May also be used for training, team meetings etc. Consider shared multi -use with gymnastics. G. Meeting Room 600 s.f. Multi -use space with view of ice, "club house" concept, could be on upper level. Total Net Area 25,480 s.f. Projected Gross Area using 20% add on tactor 31,000 s.f. PROGRAM III NATURAL ICE ARENA Multi —use covered arena with openings on two sides for.air and access to outdoors. Winter time ice use, with off season dry floor events or sports, ie soccer, tennis, roller skating. A. Arena Rink 17,000 s.f. 85' x 200' ice sheet plus boxes. B. Seating Minimal fixed seating in heated area — 200 plus with expansion by use of park bleachers in covered area. C. Team Rooms Four separate rooms with access to arena. D. Warming Room Large area for open skaters and warming. Adjacent to toilets and access to main arena as well as natural ice. E. Toilets Toilet area for skaters. F. Storage Secure storage area for equipment and off season activities. Total Net Area Projected Gross Area using 20% add on factor 1,00 s.f. 800 s.f. 600 s.f. 200 s.f. 500 s.f. 20,600 s.f. IV COMMONS The various.sports arenas will be inter — connected with public.and service areas which ideally can serve all-without duplication.. A. Facility Requirements 1. Sales office 200 s.f. 2. Administration office 100 s.f. 3. Maintenance office 100 s.f. 4. Public toilets 400 s.f. 5. Concessions _ 250 s.f. Central with two sided service. 25,000 s.f. A. Facility Requirements cont. 6. Multi -use meeting room 7. Maintenance /Zamboni 8. Refrigeration /Mechanical 9. Lobby 10. Trophy case gallery Total Net Area Projected Conm7ons Gross Area using 50% add on factor .. TIR 400 s.f. 800 s.f. 800 s.f. 1,500 s.f. 5,505 s.f. .7,500 s.f. B. Considerations to be incorporated into the design of the Connons include the following: 1. Common public entry and control. 2. Central administration office with admission and supply sales. 3. Comwn public toilets should be provided in controlled sections for admission events. 4. Provide for on grade access to both levels for public and service. 5. Centralize maintenance with inter - circulation to all arenas for staff and equipment. 6. Provide service access to each area. V TOTAL. PROGRAM GROSS AREA -10- 86,000 s.f. DESIGN CONCEPTS The following schematic design concepts, Drawings 3 thru 7, illustrate potential arrangements of facilities for each of the three approaches Al B, and C. While more detailed design could expand or reduce area, the purpose here is to show ideas and serve as a basis for cost comparison of the different approaches: SCHLNIE A - DRAWING 3 This approach provides only for gymnastics in addition:to existing facility. The arrangement is designed to accommodate future expansion of an olympic ice sheet as in "C ". SCI-i IE B - DRAWINGS 4 & 5 This approach utilizes the existing pavilion and remodels it for use as a gymnastics facility. The olympic ice arena and covered open multi -use arena are placed adjacent to share cor:mon public and service facility. Concern for fire access, remodeling costs, and existing hillside to east must be checked out. SC= C - DRAWINGS 6 & 7 This approach provides new gymnastics and olympic ice facilities, using existing pavilion for natural ice /multi -use as it was originally designed. Construction of addition would least disrupt the operation of existing rinks. Addition could be phased. -11- CONSTRUCTION COST ESTD-tATE Construction cost estimates were developed in two ways:- first, a rough square foot cost basis for each type of space and totaled for each Scheme A, B, or C, - second, a detailed cost breakdown was developed for Scheme "C" to test the square foot basis and to give a more accurate estimate of this particular scheme, which has some advantageous features and could also be phased. I SQUARE FOOT BASIS 1. Scheme A Gymnastics Arena 26,450 s.f. @ $35.85 to $45.15 = $ 951,500 to $1,198,300 Commons L.L. 5,600 s.f. @ $26.90 to $42.60 = 150,600 to 238,600 U.L. 5,600 s.f. @ 50.60 to 63.70 = 283,900 to 356,700 Total Construction Cost Estimate I $1,386,000 to $1,793,600 2. Scheme B Gymnastics Arena ' (Remodeled)L.L. 26,400 @ $20.65 to $28.45 = $ 545,200 to $ 751,100 (New)U.L. 5,100 @ 26.90 to 42.60 = 137,200 to 217,300 iOlympic Ice Arena. 31,500 s.f. @ $31.40 to $43.90 = $ 989,100 to $1,382,900 INatural Ice Arena (Open)22,300 @ $14.00 to $20.00 = $ 312,200 to $ 446,000 (Heated) 4,700 @ 35.85 to 45.15 = 168,500 to 212,200 Commns L.L. 5,400 @ $26.90 to $42.60 = $ 145,300 to $ 230,000 U.L. 3,300 @ 50.70 to 63.70 = 167,300 to 2101200 Total Construction Cost Estimate $2,464,800 to $3,449,700 3. Scheme C Gymnastics Arena 24,900 s.f. @ $35.85 to ,5'45.15 = $ 892,700 to $1,124,200 Olympic Ice Arena 32,500 s.f. @ $31.40 to $43.90 = $1,020,500 to $1,426,800 -17- 3. Scheme C cont. Natural Ice — Multi —use L.L. 26,000 @ $00.00 to $ 5.00 U.L. 500 @ 50.70 to 63.70 Commons L.L. 6,800.@ $26.90 to $42.60 U.L. 5,500 @ 50.70 to 63.70 Total Cost Range CONSTRUCTION COST ESTItiiLATE _ $ •`O to $ 130,000 = 25,400 to :31,900 _ $ 183,000 to $ 289,700 278,900 to 3502400 $2,400,500 to $3,353,000 The foregoing cost ranges are based on national averages for similar facilities. The lower figure represents costs of the lower 25% and the. higher figure is equal to the Median as published by "Means" 1986 costs. Our experience shows that Minneapolis area costs maybe 1 to 5% less. II — DETAILED COST BREAK DOWN Site Work excavation, grading, paving Concrete footings, foundations, floors Masonry walls, brick, partitions Metals roof system, miscellaneous Carpentry rough & finish Roofing and Waterproofing Doors and Windows Finishes ceilings, skate tile, gym floor, rubber floor, carpet, base, painting Specialties toilet accessories & partitions, casework, trophey case, chalkboards Fixed Equipment lockers, benches, bleachers Total General Cost Estimate —18— $ 52,800 199,900 231,900 530,000 30,000 54,500 81,700 233,900 27,200 112,000 $1,553,900 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE Electrical Construction $ 243,950 Mechanical Construction $ 420,350 HVAC $278,800 Plumbing 37,000 Sprinkler fire protection 104,550 Rink System $ 425,000 135 ton refrigeration.& floor pipe $230,000 Insulated.base and sub -floor 45,000 Dasher board 110,000 Heat reclaim 20,000 Rink dryer 20,000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ES'I :L%fATE �2, 643 , 200 Equipment not in Construction Cost $ 211,000 Zamboni $451000 Mats 33,000 Apparatus 45,000 Concession 15,000 Scoreboard 6,000 Sound system 20,000 Furniture 9,000 Nets and maintenance 8,000 Weight - exerise 30,000 TOTAL HARD COST BUDGET $2,854,200 An overall development budget.should include soft costs related to A/E fees, contingency.factor, legal and financing, bond costs, etc. which could be 10% to 20% of Hard Cost Budget. The foregoing cost.estimate does not include any parking lots, site . lighting, storm drainage, or streets which could be done by the city. -19- COST ESTIMATE RECAP The following Cost Estimate is based on foregoing detailed cost estimates and have been compiled to provide cost figures which represents four alternatives or phases for project. The costs are based on Plan Scheme C and include Architectural and Engineering fees. Also identified is a breakdown of alternates such as commons area, and floor finishes, bleachers, etc.. Phase I - Repair Pavilion for Ice and Multiuse Repair floor /ice system Movable basketball floor (3 courts) 2 team rooms, upper plat & misc. A/E fees Total Building Cost Estimate Phase II - Gymnastics Facility Isolated building with minimum connection. Commons area Movable bleachers, gym floor A/E fees Total Building Cost Estimate Phase III -.Olympic Ice Arena 32,500 s.f. arena 5,000 s.f. add commons A/E fees Total Building Cost Estimate Phase IV - Combined Scheme C Costs per detail breakdown Alternates included: Gym floor Movable bleachers Skate tile Painting Case work -20- $40,000 75,000 301.1000 5,000 $785,000 360,000 125,000 80,000 $1,390,000 150,000 95,000 $ 90,000 65,000 38,000 48,000 15,000 $256,000 $ 150;000 $1,350,000 $1,635,000 $2,640,000 COST ESTIMATE RECAP Phase IV - Combined Scheme C cont, Add repair pavilion $ 145,000 Total Construction Cost Per Plan $2,785,000 .A /E fees 165,000 Total Building Cost Estimate .$2,950,000 By combining all three phases as in IV cost savings are.at least 5% and could range up to 20% depending on time of construction. -21- / TURm'ICE _ --7 ---' _ - p" ^w - -'�- zc ^ ' � Lu CL w cc Zn cc 'SITE PLAN Lu CL w cc Zn cc V r% (� ,�.r. ., f; �• _ Ord _,.` _ �/ ,�� ' t. C•.:. nom' � / \\ Ic ------------------ �.:.:f. •' � y' - � V �`� � Ali � . - � GYMNASTICS ' �:r,t ,. f AL �C ONS 1 Yirw r �, I • 1 ��� W Lu 8vvglv88 r _ )i W at- cc CC W w CC cr ai IM ` 6 "1 `V i -north , SutE I "• °'_ n(11 N ) 2 d M I H a� d ■1 TRw l -w-A •�v -- — - _j j- -- U-1, V� 7� L4- �71 P7 1. PYMNA 04* I K A lou,te'v! 49 3p QMLAX W Lu wg: cc CC v 1--'% lj9V/M'-FLOOR PLAN Im F—= - % NORTH ,...let 10;24r 40 7c -14 Q, W z&46o 4f N CL uj . :F z Z 0 -41 Rio 6r CC w 0 (L in cc CC 0- cc t QMLAX W Lu wg: cc CC v 1--'% lj9V/M'-FLOOR PLAN Im F—= - % NORTH ,...let 10;24r 40 7c -14 Q, GY,MNASTICS'ARENA •xishIng pavrilon 'Z 11 an OLYMPIC ICE ARENA ----I 4, brA Kxn A - L I COMMONS Lu v 1fV1 4 M j r exImUng brasmar ice arena VTW— FLOOR PLAN NORTH Dc&1G-- 10 70 40 80 W LU z z la�m 04 U) L .3� Q uj C) 1zc kxzr" -Aloo 0. 5c t-, ot— cc u." 4,w < WXALIze CC 9—c. -. 11 - . < ii uj QM a cc CC co co VTW— FLOOR PLAN NORTH Dc&1G-- 10 70 40 80 L L V MNA .1 AIENA' 3 Ej •xi Ing pavilion II L L V a �7! Ej :_Fs •xl&Ung braomar ice arena 1 ,� OLYMPIC ICE ARENA :N kTURAL ICE MULTI-USE J COMMONS a �7! Ej :_Fs •xl&Ung braomar ice arena X Lu _j 0 Cl. ILI U) z z 0 CC 0-, CC w w cc In m ___ LOMIK FLOOR PLAN RTH SCSI*: 10 20 •0 so .._[!ez2F E2­125._007(11, r--------- --- --- ---�-----' --------+ �� 6. IY er CC cc cc CC RTH OCSIO: 10 20 40 80 q. I ' 3 i_ � wioakw.c.v�scb• -- i � I I � t NATURAL ICE / MULTI -USE I I OLYMPIC ICE ARENA j I •alstlnq pavilion / I \ WA6 Ir'"rl K YJP*+NLL � - _ C �'•'F .yavr I wanes � i =y �- — im e'u.'"� 14ssP- '!� - -- 1 i :•Lt :_ ��c�l !d'-_ _ -t -s --# rovr.s_ p uj L , cn uj I' — .� E a rGY6INASTICS ARENA 7 W cc a CL — I(A ¢ r COMMONS'I.� _ O. l 'k� I Z• _ _— Q Cr w cc CC II •abUnq Eraamar fee uAna LrrsPZ A!W_ FLOOR PLAN - co NORTH scale. 10 20 40 ITn�...or..c.IC+.FCwpt15 p� •G• I� DELANO ERICKSON ARCHITECTS 7415 WAYZATA BOULEVARD MINNEAPOLIS MN 55426 612 - 544 -8370 MEMORANDUM TO: Braemar Sports Complex Committee FROM: Del Erickson DATE: March 28, 1986 SUBJECT: Construction Schedule /Costs Braemar Sports Complex Comm. No. 8526 The following schedule is based on our estimate of time required to design, bid, and construct the complete.ice and-gymnastics arena addition as shown. in --Scheme ."C". The schedule uses conventional methods for the--process; a fast track approach could reduce the overall time by approximately two months. Review and Approval Begin Design Development Review and Approval Contract Documents and Bidding Begin Construction Structural Frame and Enclosure Rink Floor Complete Final Completion April 1986 May 1, 1986 June 1, 1986 August 1, 1986 September 1, 1986 December 15, 1986 February 15, 1986 It? ? r7 April9&�/ q� The foregoing depends on all steps going smoothly and could vary plus or minus one month. The operations cost estimate for the addition should include the following utilities estimate. This is based on similar facilities operating 12 months, which can effectively use reject heat from compressors. (ie hot water, space heating.) Ice Arena Portion approximately $ 50,000 to 60,000 Gymnastics portion approximately $15,000 to 20,000 Total includes Commans $ 65',000 to 80 ,000 FINANCING It appears from our research that we have three possible funding alternatives: Gross Revenue Bonds, Net Revenue Bonds, and General Obligation Bonds. Since interest rates are on the down swing, it certainly appears to be a good time to issue bonds. Philosophically, a Gross Revenue Bond would be more attractive to an investor and since the total revenue before expenses is being pledged the investor has a more secure position. The downside is that in the event of a revenue shortfall. The operating deficit would be.funded with the general city revenues. A net revenue bond is technically more responsible, since the total burden of the bonds is placed on the revenue producing facility and it requires intense management to meet the obligation. The third choice involves a community -wide voting process, takes the pressure off the facility to produce at a break -even or profitable operation and requires an intense "selling posture" to convince the community that the expense is worthwhile and necessary. Based on the forecasting of revenue from the new complex, we would recommend that we utilize Gross Revenue Bonds, coupled with a fund - raising effort that would be spearheaded by the Braemar Sports Complex Committee. The Committee would seek out corporate and individual donations coupled with an annual fund - raiser. 'The fund - raising activities would be supported by the various uses of.the Braemar facility. The raised funds would be accumulated to offset the operating short falls that may exist in future years. This committee would also take an active role in promoting the use of the facility. jaDELANO ERICKSON ARCHITECTS 7415 WAYZATA BOULEVARD MINNEAPOLIS MN 55428 ._.._.. 812 - 544 -8370 MEMORANDUM TO: Braemar Sports Complex Building Committee FROM: Del Erickson DATE: May 7, 1986 SUBJECT: Braemar Sports Complex Comm. No. 8616 The.following Cost Estimate Recap is a summary of discussions we have had relative to size and features to be included and also reflects other costs beyond building structure. These include fire protection of existing arenas, Architect and Engineering fees, parking lots, driveways, site lighting, and some landscaping. Option I - Upgrade Pavilion Building per estimate $150,000 Fire protection system 42,000 A/E fees 12,000 Option II - Gymastics Arena Min. building per estimate $785,000 Min. commons area 180,000 Fire protection for existing arena 79,000 Sitework allowance - no add. parking 502000 A/E fees 76,000 Gymnastics equipment allowance 65,000 Option III — Complete Facility. Includes option I & II_and add. 500 car parking Pavilion per above $ 204,000 Scheme C per estimate 2,518,000 (less bleachers & part gym floor) Fire protection system -exist arena 79,000 Add. parking area - 500 cars 247,000 (Incl. grading, paving, drives, lighting) Landscaping allowance 25,000 A/E fees 171,000 Equipment allowance 166,000 $ 204,000 $1,235,000 $3,410,000 RECREATION CENTER.FUND • Projected INCO:.SE AND EXPENSE For 2 11 Month Ice Facilities, 6—month Ice Facility, an 1 Gymnastics Facility REVENUE Season tickets 'Retail sales Concessions Daily skating fees Spectator.fees Ice Rental Per Hour Charge Services - Skate Sharpening Vending machine cormu sssion Skate & Locker Rental Gymnastics OPERATING EXPENSES: Salaries and wages Manager City clerical, cashiers & ticket Police takers Maintenance Organist Concession labor Total Salaries and Wages Mileage and conferences Printing - tickets, notices Laundry Telephone Light and power Fuel and heat Rubbish Hauling Cleaning Supplies Lumber & Paint General suDDlies Equipment maintenance Central services Food & soft drinks purchased Insurance Audit Total Operating Expenses TOTAL INCOME Interest on Bonds PRINCIPAL DEPRECIATION VET INCOME (LOSS) 5/16/86 $75 /hr $85 /hr . S lb 000. 00S S 15,000.00 a eee ee 40.0 UO 400.00 -- , n n n on 25,000. 00 gn nnn nn 20,000.00 181000.00 423. 5.000.00 000.00 18,000.00 480,000.00 5,000.00 — 3,000 * 00 3,000.00 2,3-00-00 2,300. 50,000.00 561,700.00 447,700.00 447,700.00 114,000.00 171,000.00 195,750.00 195,750.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 132.000.00 ($333,750.00) Bonds to be Paid $150,000.00 132.000.00 ($306,750.00) 35,000 .00 3 5, eee ee 20,000.00 a eee ee 3,000 .00 3, eee ee 140,000.00 140,UUU.UU e e eee ee eee ee 213,000 .00$ eee ee 1,000 .00 1,000.00 2,000..00 2,000.00 3,000 .00 3,000.00 100,000-00 ee eee ee 50,000.00 a eee ee eee ee 2,000 eo 8,000 .00 8,000. ee 10,000.00 a eee ee eee ee eee ee 30,000.00 a eee ee 10,000.00 a eee ee 3,000 .00 3,0 ee ee 700 .00 7 U 11 e 447,700.00 447,700.00 114,000.00 171,000.00 195,750.00 195,750.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 132.000.00 ($333,750.00) Bonds to be Paid $150,000.00 132.000.00 ($306,750.00) SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1. THE NEED TO IMPROVE THE PAVILION AND BRING IT UP TO CODE WILL COST THE CITY OF EDINA $204,000. 2. THE EDINA GYMNASTICS ASSOCIATION IS IN NEED OF A PERMANENT FACILITY: A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF PRESSURE IS BEING PLACED ON THIS ORGANIZATION TO DELIVER AND EXPAND A QUALITY PROGRAM AND ALSO PROVIDE A FACILITY FOR ITS PARTICIPANTS. 3. THE YOUTH POPULATION IN EDINA IS ON THE INCREASE AGAIN: THE SCHOOL SYSTEM IS GOING TO NEED ADDITIONAL FACILITIES IN THE NEAR FUTURE WHICH COULD PUT PRESSURE ON ATHLETIC FACILITIES. 4. THERE IS A NEED WITHIN THE COMMUNITY TO DEVELOP ACTIVITIES NOT ONLY FOR YOUTH BUT ALSO FOR THE ADULTS. 5. THE USE OF ALCOHOL AND OTHER CHEMICALS WITHIN EDINA NEEDS MORE ATTENTION: THE PEER PRESSURE AND FINANCIAL PRESSURE TO COPE WITH THESE PROBLEMS CAN BE BETTER SERVED BY PROVIDING MORE SOCIAL ALTERNATIVES WITHIN EDINA. SPORTS AND RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES CAN PROVIDE ONE SOLUTION. 6. THE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION IS EXPANDING AND THE LATE EVENING HOURS ARE A PROBLEM FOR THE PLAYERS. THE PARENTS, AND ALSO THE SCHOOLS. SIMILAR PROBLEMS ALSO EXIST FOR THE FIGURE SKATING CLUB. 7. EFFICIENT USE OF THE PAVILION CAN BE MAINTAINED WITH A WELL COORDINATED AND PUBLICIZED EFFORT BY THE PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT DURING THE NON- WINTER MONTHS TO PROVIDE NEW REVENUE. 8. THE NEED FOR A YEAR - AROUND SECOND SHEET OF ICE IS REAL. MANY ACTIVITIES ARE BEING PURCHASED OUTSIDE THE COMMUNITY FOR SPRING, SUMMER AND FALL HOCKEY. ADULT HOCKEY AND OTHER OPEN SKATING ACTIVITIES CAN BE PROMOTED AND CONTROLLED BY EDINA PEOPLE THROUGH THE ADDITION OF AN OLYMPIC -SIZE RINK: SEVERAL NATIONAL HOCKEY PROGRAMS WILL BE ATTRACTED TO THIS AREA. A COMMITMENT FROM THE AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION OF THE U.S. (AHAUS) AND THE INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE (IOC) CAN BE OBTAINED TO USE OUR FACILITY AND GIVE IT A STRONG OFF - SEASON FINANCIAL BASE. 9. AN OLYMPIC -SIZE RINK CAN PROVIDE A NEW ATTRACTION FOR EDINA AND ALSO BE USED VERY EFFICIENTLY WITHIN OUR PROGRAM TO PROVIDE FOR MULTIPLE -TEAM PRACTICES AND OTHER EVENTS. '.: EDINA PARK BOARD 7:00 P.M. - BRAEMAR CLUB HOUSE 8:30 P.M. - EDINA CITY HALL MAY 13, 1986 -------------------------- - - - - -- MEMBERS PRESENT: Bob Christianson, Mack Thayer, Marilyn Wooldridge, George Warner, Andy Montgomery, Jim Fee, Bill Lord, Jean Rydell, Joan Lonsbury ABSENT: Don Wineberg STAFF PRESENT: Bob Kojetin, John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Larry Thayer, Madelyn Krinke BRAEMAR COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Ed Howat, Dick Maguire, Craig Sarner, Dick Burman, John Justice, Art Katzman The Edina Park Board met at 7:00 p.m. at Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse and was given a tour of the facility. The Park Board was introduced to Lucy Rosche who is the Clubhouse Manager. Ms. Rosche gave a brief synopsis of rentals for the Clubhouse since May 1. There are thirteen wedding receptions scheduled for this year and many golf course events in the main Braemar hall already. The Park Board then adjourned to the meeting at the City Hall at 8:30 p.m. The meeting was called to order by Chairman, Joan Lonsbury....__Joan. suggested that Edina's idea for the Peace theme was for the audience to join in singing "Let There Be Peace On Earth" with the Sousa Band on July 4 this year. Joan mentioned that she had a letter today from a parent objecting to the scheduling of practices of any athletic activities on Wednesday because of conflict with church activities. Joan stated that she intended to write a letter to the associations asking them to honor the tradition of Wednesday nights not being scheduled for athletic activities and would also write to the churches in the community asking them to also observe Wednesday's as church night for youth as much as possible. Bob Kojetin reported that playground equipment in many of the parks is in rough shape after the winter. A lot of the equipment has been and is being replaced, including concrete rings and sand under the equipment. The maintenance crew has gone through all sites this spring and replaced a lot of broken and worn parts. Mr. Kojetin will present an updated ten -year plan in June, which hopefully will have enough money budgeted in 1987 to replace all old equipment and upgrade all parks. Bob stated that he had a call from a man who was very angry about a playground not being done immediately and that the person would probably come to the next park board meeting and council meeting because all of his demands can not be met immediately. 1 BRAEMAR SPORTS COMPLEX w � Joan Lonsbury thanked all who have worked on the Braemar Sports Complex Committee. She introduced Ed Howat, chairman of the committee, who presented the findings of the committee and the committee's recommendation and proposal. Ed Howat prefaced his presentation of the committee's findings by stating that he couldn't help thinking about the kids - in particular the large number who are in the gymnastics program who may be served with an eviction notice. The whole reason this study was done was for the benefit of the kids in this community. Mr. Howat stated that last September when the pavilion floor was in need of repair, and when the gymnastics association heard that they may be losing their facility at the hut, a committee was formed to look into the possibilities and needs of the associations for facilities. After many meetings and surveys and discussions, three options were formulated: Plan A - Repair the Pavilion and be very Spartan, but restore it to its original condition. The cost would be about $204,000. Plan B - Convert the Pavilion to a gymnastics facility - build an Olympic -size ice arena and covered open multi -use arena adjacent to share common public and service facility. A major concern with this plan is fire safety. Plan C - Provide a new gymnastics and Olympic ice facilities, using existing pavilion for natural ice /multi- use.as it was originally.designed. An estimate of 3 -1/2 million dollars has been made for this plan. Mr. Howat commented that he had discussions with a variety of people, in which indications were made that Normandale Community College is looking into building an Olympic size pool and Bloomington is looking into building an Olympic ski jump. If these became reality and if Edina would build an Olympic size hockey rink, the Southwest suburb area could become a drawing card for many Olympic games and events. Mr. Howat stated that several options have been investigated- but not in great detail - for funding of a project. Basically the options are revenue bonds - net or gross, and general obligation bonds. He suggested that perhaps gross revenue bonds and fund raising efforts would be a good possibility. Comments by the other members of the committee were also made as follows: Dick Maguire, President, EGA - thanked the committee and Ed for their support of the gymnastics association. He stated that there are 500 in the gymnastics program now and over 800 in hockey and he believes the community could get behind this project and give a lot of help. Dick Burman, President of Braemar Figure Skating Club - said he thinks that people move to Edina because they know they will be able to sell their homes when they move because the community is a desirable one to live in and their investment is a sound one. But Edina must keep up with other communities to maintain that status. 01 Craig Sarner from Edina High School - indicated that he felt it was important for community people to get behind youth athletics. A lot of what sports has to do with is dreams and the children are affected by the dreams they grow up with. John Keprios stated that there are very apparent trends - the 1985 -86 season was the first time all hockey games were scheduled indoors. Parents and kids are willing to pay for the indoor ice. Through a survey, coaches indicated they can get 2 - 3 times more accomplished on indoor ice vs. outdoor ice. The need for more indoor ice does exists. Edina has always been a city_of leaders and achievers; time has caught up to us. Peggy Fifield, Head Coach of EGA, stated that they have had to limit their enrollment because of inadequate space. The main issue now is safety. Larry Thayer, Braemar Arena Manager, indicated that his staff would like to see some money put into this project to bring Edina back to #1 status. Bob Christianson asked some questions about the Projected Income and Expense report; Q: is the $50,000 income from EGA generated only by fees? A: Dick Maguire answered, yes Q: Would you cut out outdoor rinks? A: John Keprios answered that some would be eliminated but certainly not all would be. Q. If gross revenue bonds was the method of financing, would the loss be made up from general operating funds? A: Bob Kojetin stated that would be true. Q: What is the market rate for ice rental now? A: Larry Thayer answered that as of last summer, the rates ranged from $67 /hr - $74 /hr. for prime ice. Q: Are demographics of future users based on the School Board's projections? A: John Keprios said, yes they are. Andy Montgomery asked about the need for an Olympic size rink. Bob Kojetin said that it would have multiple use - an Olympic size rink could be sectioned off so there could actually be four mite teams using the ice for practice at one time. While the Olympic rink would be mostly for practice, the rink could be scheduled for Olympic hockey events. Larry Thayer also mentioned that if more teams could be scheduled at the same time indoors, that would free up time for adults to use the rink at a more reasonable hour. 3 Mr. Sarner indicated that an Olympic size rink would be extremely good for the high school players to use for practice and also more and more games at a high school level are being played on Olympic size rinks so the more opportunity our players have to skate on the larger rink, the better it is for them. Joan Lonsbury asked about seating for gymnastics and hockey. She wondered how many spectators could be seated on bleachers, etc. John Keprios.indicated that the plans call for seating for about 1200. Joan asked why so few seats if we would expect to have large events. John Keprios said they do not want to take away from the arena. Bob Kojetin further answered that the seating has not been fully investigated and decided upon all the specifics regarding seating at this time. Joan Lonsbury asked if there would be spectator seating in the gymnastics area. Bob Kojetin said there would be and Dick Maguire said the capacity would be about 500. Mr. Maguire feels provisions would be made for additional seating for national and regional meets which could also generate revenue. Joan Lonsbury asked if bandy could be played on an Olympic size rink. Bob Kojetin said that rink bandy could be. George Warner asked about the multi -use aspect of the facility. He wondered if it could be adapted for uses other than hockey. Ed Howat said a good way to make the facility a multi -use facility would be to convert the hockey rink to a gym floor, however the length 'of time it takes to make the conversion is very great and therefore the cost of converting it is very great. That is a possibility that could be checked on and estimates could be made of what revenues would be required to make it feasible. Bob Kojetin mentioned that a wood floor has been discussed previously and it would be an excellent way to alleviate some of the scheduling problems which are encountered in school gyms for basketball and volleyball. George Warner feels that if.the project goes to a bond issue it would be good to try to sell the public with a facility that is multi - purpose for the entire community, not just for three groups. Bob Kojetin said he felt it was important to put a wood basketball floor into a facility to make another gym area in the community. Mr. Kojetin made a comparison of construction costs from the time the original arena and pavilion were built to -the construction costs today. He said the present pavilion which cost $300,000 to construct would probably cost $1,100,000 to $1,200,000 and the present arena which cost $500,000 today would cost $2,500,000 - $3,000,000. Bob again stated that we do-have to make sure we can construct a facility which is multi - purpose for more than three groups and good 20 years from now. Mack Thayer commented that a review of funding of the Golf Course Club House and arena bonds would seem to indicate that a bond issue would work very well now for another facility such as the one being proposed. Marilyn Wooldridge MADE A MOTION TO ACCEPT OPTION C CONCEPT (PLAN #7 OF THE PROPOSAL) AND RECOMMEND IT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. Jean Rydell seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4 N OTHER BUSINESS Bob Kojetin announced that another proposal which will be coming to the Park Board is for a facility for the Historical Society. Bob stated that location is one of the issues which will need to be decided. Mr. Kojetin also mentioned that the Normandale Park issue will be discussed at the June Park Board meeting. Bill Lord MADE A MOTION TO ADJOURN. Bob Christianson Seconded the Motion. Motion Carried. Meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m. ITEMS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL: Marilyn Wooldridge MADE A MOTION TO ACCEPT OPTION C CONCEPT. (PLAN #7 OF THE PROPOSAL) AND RECOMMEND IT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. Jean Rydell seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5 C MEMORANDUM TO: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGERry� FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CITY CLERK SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR ON -SALE BEER LICENSE - ST. LOUIS RIB COMPANY DATE: MAY 15, 1986 The City has received an application for an On -Sale Beer License from the St. Louis Rib Company, 3936 West 50th Street.(location formerly occupied by The Brothers Restaurant). Approval of the license application has been received from the Police Depart- ment and the Health Department and is recommended for Council approval. Residential property owners within 500 feet of the location have been notified by mail. To date, no comment or objection has been received by my office. f MEMORANDUM -p TO: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager DATE: May 15, 1986 FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Wine Licensing At the special Council meeting of April 28, 1986, the wine licensing process was discussed. At that time the Council requested City staff members to highlight the difference between the State of Minnesota wine license application and the Edina wine license application. Those highlights are best provided in three parts, which will be outlined below - General, Part I Specifics and Part II Specifics. General 1. The _Edina application forms request all items included in the State of Minnesota, "Application for City On -Sale Wine License." 2. The Edina application requests items in greater detail than the State of Minnesota application. 3. The Edina application requests verifiable documentation for the background and financial investigation of the applicant. Part I Specifics (Edina additions) 1. Military service. 2. Spouse's date of birth and maiden name. 3. Voter registration information. 4. Local political contributions. 5. Residences for 10 years (State requests 5 years). 6. Spouse's previous addresses. 7.- Spouse's.business or occupation and employment history. 8. Amount of investment individual has in the business. 9. Bankruptcy. 10. Attachments to Part I. Part II Specifics (Edina additions) , 1. Has any other restaurant business operated at the applicant address? 2. Conditions of lease agreements. Kenneth E. Rosland Page 2 May 15, 1986 3. Details of purchase or lease of the building. 4. Financial assistance (mortgages, loans, etc.). 5. Changes in Articles of Incorporation and by -laws (if renewal). 6. Attachments to Part II. In addition to the above information, our discussions have attempted to find a way to make the process faster and reduce the associated costs to the City during the investigative process. The greatest delay factor has been the collection of the financial documentation called for as attachments to Part I and Part II, and the subsequent time for assembly and analysis of this information. It is my opinion that the entire Edina application process is important for new or relatively new restaurants in the City. However, as we discussed, the assembly of documentation and analysis of the information for well - established restaurants could be shifted to the private sector. This would speed the process for the applicant, reduce the time factors, simplify the police review, and save associated costs. A potential-criticism of such a process would be the suggestion of a double standard for old and new applicants. I think this could be defended by the track record a well - established restaurant would have established. A well - established restaurant would have a History of licensing as a restaurant and most likely licensing of 3.2 beer. Additionally, positive financial assumptions could be made about a business and its longevity. Therefore, in order, to speed the process and reduce costs, the below requirements could be'established for a licensed restaurant, licensed for the service of 3.2 beer, which has been.operating for five - years_or_ more:._ _ . * Completion and submission of the Edina application forms. * Affidavit from a CPA stating: a. A review and /or audit has been conducted within the past 12 months. b. The result of this review and /or audit includes those items specified as attachments to Part I and Part II of the Edina application. c. The result of this review and /or audit complies with all of the laws of the State of Minnesota governing the taxation and sale of intoxicating liquor; the rules and regulations promulgated by the Liquor Control Commissioner, and all ordinances of the City of Edina. Kenneth E. Rosland Page 3 May 15, 1986, .I hope the above comparison of applications and the modification of the process to save time and money are appropriately described. I will be in attendance at the Council meeting to present the information if requested. R MEMORANDUM TO: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager DATE: May 15, 1986 FROM:, Craig G. Swanson,.Chief of Police SUBJECT: Ordinance Interpretation At the special Council meeting of April 28, 1986, the Council requested a copy of the attached correspondence. This request came as an aside to the . informal hearing process on licensing. CRAIG SWANSON CHIEF OF POLICE CGS:nah Attachment MONCITV OF a�7►a /EST 50TH STREET. EDINA. h1;NNESOTA 55424 27 -8E-3 April 21, 1986 Mr. Thomas Erickson 2200 First Bank Place East Minneapolis, MN 55402 Dear Mr. Erickson: During mid - April, I met with all the wine licensees. in Edina. The purpose of these meetings was to answer any questions they had relating to the serving of wine and to explain to them the inspectional process that the Police Department will conduct. An excellent interchange occurred in each case. However, several questions arose which may need some clarification. I have posed those questions in a brief hypothetical form for your review: * Can a wine licensee serve wine to a person ordering only appetizer items from a menu rather than an entree or sandwich as specified in Ordinance No. 902 -A1, Sec. 1? Conceivably a person, either by choice or time factors, may want the variety, small portion or relative speed of appetizers. On the other hand, the appetizer may become the minimal food purchase qualifying the customer for the service of wine. * Can a wine licensee serve wine to a customer during the period of time prior to the placing of the food order? (See Ordinance No. 902 -A1, Sec. 40, (a).) Current restaurant custom would call for the service of an alcoholic beverage during the period of menu selection. The ordinance seems to indicate a classic viewpoint of wine service strictly with the meal. However, all customers may not share this etiquette. A person being served in this manner may not order a complete meal as in the previous question or may excuse themselves from ordering any food. * Does the manager of a wine licensed establishment need be physically on premise at all times? (Ordinance No. 902 -A1, Sec. 39, (a), 6). The possibility could arise where a manager is called to a meeting in another part of the shopping center or due to an emergency is outside the establishment for a short time. If the manager is not present, must the licensed premise close for business or merely cease wine sale? * Can a wine license serve samples of wine (approx. 1 ounce), free of charge, for promotional purposes? A reasonably conceived -of market Mr. Thomas Erickson Page 2 April 20, 1986 strategy might be to serve samples of food or samples of wine to customers as they wait in line for seating. In this possible case, the customers are within the establishment with the apparent intent to have a meal. The "samples" are not intended to draw the customer in, but only help them make a selection.. * Can an 18- year -old waiter /waitress serve wine even though ordinance. precludes them from possessing such a beverage? (Ordinance No. 902, Sec. 28). Current Statutes are somewhat vague. A check with the Liquor Control Commission revealed that their interpretation is contrary to our ordinance. Furthermore, they have so informed one of our licensees that 18- year -olds are eligible for serving and any City ordinance will be-superceded. Lastly, Chapter.330 of the 1986 Legislature, effective September 1, 1986, will clarify the point and prohibit cities from being more restrictive. - If you have any questions about this inquiry, please contact me. Sincerely,-. Craig G. Swanson_ Chief of Police Edina Police Department 925 -2242 CGS:nah y � , AGREEMENT for I -494 CORRIDOR STUDY THE AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 1986 by and between the Metropolitan Council, a public corporation and political subdivision of Minnesota, hereinafter called the "Council," and the CITY OF , a municipal corporation and political subdivsion of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter called . WHEREAS, I -494 is reaching the end of its 20 year design period; and WHEREAS, improvements to the freeway are needed in anticipation of the expected development in the southern and southwestern portions of the Metropolitan Area; and WHEREAS, an I -494 Corridor Study is needed: To produce an ultimate design concept for the metropolitan roadways in that corridor. To identify development levels and land -use types compatibile with the proposed transportation infrastructure. To recommend a strategy (i.e., timetable and funding mechanisms) for implementation of the proposed transportation improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings herein expressed, the PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOW: SECTION I PROFESSIONAL SERVICES.CONTRACT Upon receipt of the fund share of Minnesota Department of Transportation, Regional Transit Board, Hennepin County, Metropolitan Airports Commi3sion arc the cities of Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina, Richfield and Minnetonka as provided in Section 5 hereof, the Council shall act as lead agency and shall contract on behalf of the parties with a consultant to be selected, hereinafter called "Consultant," who shall prepare the Study for a cost not to exceed $180,000. SECTION 2 PROJECT MANAGEMENT TEAM ORGANIZATION AND PURPOSE The parties shall establish a Program Management Team (PMT), which shall supervise the Consultant in preparing the Study. The PMT shall meet at least once each month to review and approve the Consultant's progress, findings, and recommendations, and shall take actions upon majority vote of a quorum of present and voting members. The PMT shall not allow proxy voting, except by . designated alternate, and shall observe the requirements of the Minnesota Open Meeting Law. The PMT shall report final recommendations pertaining to the Consultant's findings to the parties no later than May, 1987. SECTION 3 PROJECT MANAGEMENT TEAM The PMT shall be made up of eighteen (18) members whom the parties shall apppoint as follows: Metropolitan Council Minnesota Department of Transportation Regional Transit Board Bloomington Eden Prairie Edina Two (2) members Two (2) members Two (2) members Two (2) members Two (2) members Two (2) members Richfield Hennepin County Minnetonka Metropolitan Airports Commission Two (2) members Two (2) members One (1) member One (1) member Each member shall designate an alternate who should be fully versed in the agency's position and given the member's endorsement to speak and vote. SECTION 4 CONSULTANT SCOPE OF WORK The scope of work which the Consultant shall perform is shown in Attachment A to this Agreement. SECTION 5 FINANCE The Council shall receive funds from the parties as prescribed herein, and shall deposit funds in an interest - bearing account which it shall manage. Within ten (10) days after the effective date of the Consultant contract, the parties shall furnish to the Council at least one -third (1/3) of their respective share amounts. On a date three (3) months after the effective date of the Consultant contract, the parties shall furnish to the Council at least an.addition al one -third (1/3) of their respective share amounts. On the date six (6) months after the effective date of the Consultant contract, the parties shall furnish to the Council the final one -third (1/3) of their respective share amounts. The Council shall disburse funds from the account in payment for consultant services in accordance with billings received. Before termination of this Agreement, the Council shall provide an accounting of receipts and expenditures to each contributing party, and shall refund the remaining balance, together with accrued interest, to each contributor in proportion to that contributor's total contribution. I The parties shall contribute the following shares of the Study preparation costs: Metropolitan Council $ 20,000 Minnesota Department of Transportation 50,000 Regional Transit Board 20,000 Hennepin County 15,000 City of Bloomington. 15,000 City of Eden Prairie 15,000 City of Edina 15,000 City of Richfield 159000 City of Minnetonka 7,500 Metropolitan Airports Commission 7,500 Total $180,000 SECTION 6 STAFF SUPPORT In addition to the contributions provided in Section 5, the parties agree to contribute sufficient staff support to ensure that the Study will be completed expeditiously and that all actions pertaining to its development will be documented and circulated. SECTION 7 DISPOSITION OF DATA The Consultant shall deliver original copies of all data, computations, working papers, technical reports and recommendations to the Council, who shall retain them and whose property they shall become. SECTION 10 AGREEMENT TERMINATION This Agreement shall terminate no later than fifteen (15) months after the effective date of the Consultant's Contract with the Council. t L M E M 0 DATE: May 15, 1986 TO: Kenneth Rosland FROM: Craig Larsen SUBJECT: 494 Corridor Study The 494 corridor study which was mandatedby the Homart lawsuit is now underway. Currently, a subcommittee of the group is attempting to assign land uses and intensities in the study area. These decisions will be crucial to the outcome of the study. Although these issues were briefly discussed during council review of the Comprehensive Plan, we think the land use issue deserves another review. Currently, the Edina Zoning Ordinance allows Floor Area Ratios (FAR's) of 0.5 for most office and and commercial property in the study area. Eden Prairie and Minnetonka have similar development limitations. Bloomington's Ordinance, however, allows much more intense development. Bloomington has indicated that they intend to use an average FAR of 1.65 for purposes of the study. (floor.area ratio is the ratio of building floor area to lot area) If the study shows traffic volumes in excess of the capacity of 494 it may be necessary to limit land use intensity to achieve an acceptable traffic flow. Transit, additional or larger collector street, ridesharing, etc. may also be part of the solution. Listed below are three possible approaches to the study: 1. Use existing Zoning Ordinance maximum FAR's for our projections. Other Cities would do the same.. This is Bloomington's approach since they would be giving up nothing at the start. We would need to make it clear that we are not conceding the FAR's used by Bloomington. 2. Edina's Comprehensive Plan projects traffic generation in any particular area through Traffic Assignment Zones (TAZ). TAZ fore- casts contained in our plan are relatively conservative. In the future, quite possibly as a result of this study, TAZ forecasts may be used as a tool to limit land use intensity. I . R The Council may want to consider increasing some of our TAZ forecasts to allow greater flexibility in the future. This would require amendments to the Transportation Section of the Comprehensive Plan butwould not require amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. 3. Individual cities could supply land uses for parcels in the study area with the Metropolitan Council or consultant assigning levels of intensity. This could put all on an equal footing to negotiate. For instance, all office and commercial property in the study area could be subject to a FAR of 0.5. This would make it possible to negotiate or "buy" higher intensities later. Bloomington will oppose this option and the Metro Council may be reluctant to force this on them. JC —/— TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Enginee VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager The sanitary sewer system on Bruce Avenue and Arden Avenue immediately south of W. 50th Street is in need of substantial repair. Also, a section of the W. 50th Street sanitary east of Arden to France has some work necessary. The staff has reviewed the various methods of repair ranging from reconstruction to attempts at "spot" repairs. The standard construction methods normally available to us for use are not very cost effective. The staff has been aware of a method of "internal" repair of sewers using a liner method. This method requires no holes to be dug in the streets or boulevards to effect the repairs. This method of repair has:not been avail- able to the Upper Midwest until now, without substantial cost due to long travel by out -of -state contractors. A company is setting the equipment necessary to do this type of work in the Twin Cities. The estimated cost to do the sewer repairs is approximately $150,000.00. The total estimate is broken down as follows: $67,000.00 for Bruce and Arden Ave. work $72,400.00 for W. 50th St. work $10,600.00 for Wooddale Park are sewer work 150,000.00 The staff would recommend that the City authorize a test section of repair be done by this "liner" method in Wooddale Park. If this is successful, staff would recommend bids be taken for the remainder of the work. The funding for the project would be from the utility fund with a re- ordering of the projects listed in the ten year capital plan. The lift station renovation projects would be moved to later years in order to fund these repairs. KR: FJH:Im 5/16/86 t. ; e UNIT ESTIMATE OF COST QUANTITY MATERIAL CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TOTAL SANITARY SEWER 12 IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -375 8" LOCATION: Dearborn Court in Dearborn and Blake Woods Addition $20.00 HEARING DATE: May 19, 1986 L /F, ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $21,009.05 22.00 (Includes Engineering, Clerical & Interest 8" NO. OF ASSESSABLE LOTS DEARBORN ADDITION: 6 1,309.50 ESTIMATED COST PER LOT: $2,100.01 OR TOTAL: $12,605.46 V.C.P. NO. OF ASSESSABLE LOTS BLAKEWOOD ADDITION: 4 187 ESTIMATED COST PER LOT: $2,100.91 OR TOTAL: $8,403.64 10 -12' Depth ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LOT BLOCK ADDITION PINS NUMBERS 1 1 Blakewood 2 1 " 3 1 " 4 1 " 1 1 Dearborn 2 1 " 3 1 " 4 1 " 5 1 " 6 1 " UNIT QUANTITY MATERIAL PRICE TOTAL 12 L /F, 8" D.I.P. Cl. 52 0 -8' Depth $20.00 $240.00 6 L /F, 8" D.I.P. Cl. 52 8 -10' Depth 22.00 132.00 97 L /F, 8" V.C.P. 0 -8' Depth 13.50 1,309.50 20 L /F, 8" V.C.P. 8 -20' Depth 14.00 280.00 187 L /F, 8" V.C.P. 10 -12' Depth 14.50 2,711.50 'a r Page 2 of 2 Pages May 14, 1986 Estimate of Cost City of Edina Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -375 PREPARED BY CHECKED BY E v SUB- TOTAL: ADD 10% ENGINEERING AND 2% CLERICAL: ADD 11.25% CAPITALIZED INTEREST: ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION: F a c i s J. f fma Director of ubli and City Engineer rks $16,861.20 2,023.34 $18,884.54 2,124.51 21,009.05 UNIT QUANTITY MATERIAL PRICE TOTAL 99 L /F, 8" V.C.P. 12 -14' Depth $16.00 $1,584.00 61 L /F, 8" V.C.P. 14 -16' Depth 18.00 1,098.00 3 Each, Std. 0 -8' Manholes 11000.00 3,000.00 11.6 V /F, Extra Wall Manhole 85.00 986.00 6 Each, 8 x 4 Tees 40.00 240.00 330 L /F, 4" C.I. for House Service 10.00 3,300.00 11 Each, 4" C.I. Plugs 15.00 165.00 5.22 V /F, 8" Inside Drop Manhole 160.00 835.20 100 C /Y, 1 -1z" Rock 9.80 980.00 PREPARED BY CHECKED BY E v SUB- TOTAL: ADD 10% ENGINEERING AND 2% CLERICAL: ADD 11.25% CAPITALIZED INTEREST: ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION: F a c i s J. f fma Director of ubli and City Engineer rks $16,861.20 2,023.34 $18,884.54 2,124.51 21,009.05 ESTIMATE OF COST May 14, 1986 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA WATERMAIN .IMPROVEMENT NO. P -WM -360 LOCATION: Dearborn Court in Dearborn & Blakewoods Addition HEARING DATE: May 19, 1986 ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $12,759.04 (Includes Engineering, Clerical & Interest NO. OF ASSESSABLE LOTS - DEARBORN ADDITION: 6 ESTIMATED COST PER LOT: $1,417.67 OR TOTAL: $8,506.02 NO. OF ASSESSABLE LOTS - BLAKEWOOD ADDITION: 3 ESTIMATED COST PER LOT: $1,417.67 OR TOTAL: $4,253.01 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LOT BLOCK ADDITION PINS NUMBERS 1 1 Blakewood 2 1 " 3 1 " 1 1 Dearborn 2 1 " 3 1 " 4 1 " 5 1 " 6 1 " UNIT QUANTITY MATERIAL PRICE TOTAL 199 L /F, 6" D.I.P. Cl. 52 $14.00 $2,786.00 105 L /F, 12" Copper (with compression fittings) 10.00 1,050.00 3 Each, 6" Gate Valves with Box & Cover 500.00 1,500.00 1 Each, 6" Plug Tapped with 12" Corporation 100.00 100.00 1 Each, 6" Plug 30.00 30.00 1 Each, Remove & REplace Hydrant, Gate Valve & Lead 1,100.00 1,100.00 Page 2 of 2 Pages May 14, 1986 Estimate of Cost City of Edina Watermain Improvement No. P -WM -360 UNIT QUANTITIY MATERIAL PRICE TOTAL 1 Each, 6 x 6 x 6 x 6 Cross $400.00 $400.00 1 Each, Remove 6 x 6 Tee 150.00 150.00 3 Each, 6" Tapping Saddles for 1" Service 65.00 195.00 3 Each, 12" x 1" x 12" Copper Tees 60.00 180.00 1 Each, 12" x 1" x 1" x 1" Copper Branch 50.00 50.00 9 Each, Curb Boxes & Stops 85.00 765.00 262 L /F, 1" Copper for House Service 7.00 1,834.00 1 Each, Remove 3/4" Water Service & Box 100.00 100.00 SUB - TOTAL: ADD 10% ENGINEERING & 2% CLERICAL: ADD 11.25 CAPITALIZED INTEREST: ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION: PREPARED BY 67 CHECKED BY Aha Francis J. Hoff an, 7rrk' Director of P lic W and City Engineer $10,240.00 1,228.80 $11,468.80 1,290.24 $12,759.04 >► ESTIMATE OF COST May 14, 1986 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. P -ST.S. -180 LOCATION: Dearborn Court in Dearborn & Blake Woods Addition HEARING DATE: May 19, 1986 ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $18,670.06 (Includes Engineering, Clerical & Interest NO. OF ASSESSABLE LOTS IN DEARBORN ADDITION: 6 ESTIMATED COST PER ASSESSABLE LOT: $1,867.01 OR TOTAL: $11,202.06 NO. OF ASSESSABLE LOTS IN BLAKEWOOD ADDITION: 4 ESTIMATED COST PER ASSESSABLE LOT: $1,867.01 OR TOTAL: $7,468.04 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LOT BLOCK ADDITION PINS NUMBERS 1 1 Blakewood 2 1 " 3 1 " 4 1 " 1 1 Dearborn 2 1 " 3 1 " 4 1 " 5 1 " 6 1 " NIT QUANTITY MATERIAL PRICE TOTAL 224 L /F, 12" R.C.P. 0 -8' Depth $19.00 $4,256.00 84 L /F, 15" R.C.P. 0 -8' Depth 21.00 1,764.00 38 L /F, 15" R.C.P. 8 -10' Depth 23.00 874.00 V Page 2 of 2 Pages May 14, 1986 Estimate of Cost City of Edina Storm Sewer Improvement No. P -ST.S. -180 SUB - TOTAL: ADD 10% ENGINEERING & 2% CLERICAL: ADD 11.25% CAPITALIZED INTEREST: ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION: PREPARED BY CHECKED BY F cis J. Hof n, Director of Pu lic XrlWs and City Engineer $14,984.00 1,798.08 $16,782.08 1,887.98 18,670.06 UNIT QUANTITY MATERIAL PRICE TOTAL 45 L /F, 18" C.M.P. Plastic Coated 0 -8' Depth $33.00 $1,485.00 1 Each, 18" C.M. Flared End Section with Trash 375.00 375.00 Guard with Concrete Slab 1 Each, F & I Trash Guard for Extension 12" 150.00 150.00 C.M. Flared End Section 1 Each, Std. 0 -8' Manhole 1,000.00 1,000.00 5 Each, Std. 0 -6' Type "C" Catchbasins 900.00 4,500.00 25 F & I Hay Bales around Catch Basins 5.00 125.00 3 C /Y, Grouted Rip Rap 85.00 255.00 20 L /F, Remove & Relay 12" C.M.P. 0 -4' Depth 10.00 200.00 SUB - TOTAL: ADD 10% ENGINEERING & 2% CLERICAL: ADD 11.25% CAPITALIZED INTEREST: ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION: PREPARED BY CHECKED BY F cis J. Hof n, Director of Pu lic XrlWs and City Engineer $14,984.00 1,798.08 $16,782.08 1,887.98 18,670.06 May 14, 1986 ESTIMATE OF COST CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA GRADING & GRAVELING IMPR VEMENT NO. P -C -144 LOCATION: Dearborn Court in Dearborn & Blake Woods Addition HEARING: May 19, 1986 ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $10,341.80 (Includes Engineering, Clerical & Interest) NO. LOTS IN DEARBORN ADDITON: 6 TOTAL: $6,205.08 ESTIMATED COST PER LOT: $1,034.18 NO. OF LOTS IN BLAKEWOOD ADDITION: 4 ESTIMATED COST PER LOT: $1,034.18 TOTAL: $4,136.72 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LOT BLOCK ADDITION PINS NO. 1 1 Blakewood 2 1 " 3 1 " 4 1 ". 1 1 Dearborn 2 1 " 3 1 " 4 1 " 5 1 " 6 1 " NIT QUANTITY MATERIAL PRICE TOTAL 940 Tons, Cl. 2 Gravel, 1' Thick Compacted $7.00 $6,580.00 2 Each, Adjust Manholes $110.00 $220.00 5 Each, Adjust Catch Basins $75.00 $375.00 250 C /Y, Excavation $4.50 $1,125.00 s Page 2 of 2 Pages Estimate of Cost Grading & Graveling Improvement No. P -C -144 May 14, 1986 SUB - TOTAL: $8,300.00 ADD 10% ENGINEERING & 2% CLERICAL: $996.00 9,296.00 ADD 11.25% CAPITALIZED INTEREST: $1,045.80 ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $10,341.80 PREPARED BY CHECKED BY C' rancis J. Hof man, P. . Director of P blic s and City Engineer in SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED Public Finance Advisors 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101.2143 612.223.3000 Mayor C. Wayne Courtney Members, City Council Mr. Kenneth Rosland, City Manager Mr. John Wallin, Finance Director City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Re: Request for Presentation �y P\ �J i Springsted Incorporated has reviewed your City's outstanding bonded indebtedness and has found an opportunity for the City to realize substantial savings by advance refunding certain issues. We brought our findings to the attention of Mr. Wallin and had scheduled a meeting with him to discuss in greater depth the specific issues. We have since been advised by Mr. Wallin that Mr. Rosland is now investigating the potentials of advance refunding with another f iscal advisor. We sincerely believe it will be advantageous for the City to also consider a proposal from Springsted. Springsted is the oldest, most established and largest independent fiscal advisor to public jurisdictions in the region. We have extensive experience in advance refunding, having conducted 75 successful refundings over just the last three years. These refundings were for 50 separate local governments in an aggregate value of $240,000,000. A listing of these refundings is enclosed as Exhibit I. Advance refunding of outstanding debt is a complicated process, offering the potential of significant interest cost savings if properly structured. From our initial analysis, we estimate the City will realize substantial interest cost savings, both on an annual and on a present value basis, by advance. refunding. certain of its bond issues. Whether the City will. realize the full potential of this interest cost savings is dependent on the quality of the fiscal advice it receives. We would very much appreciate an opportunity to present to the City our approach to'advance'refund certain of the City's outstanding bond issues. We are confident we can demonstrate that -the City will realize substantial interest cost and, fee savings by following the Springsted approach. We have included a brief description . of the advance refunding process for your review. e VIC City of Edina, Minnesota 8 May 1986 Page 2 We shall appreciate your consideration of our request, and we will be contacting you in the next ,three or four days to further discuss an opportunity to make a presentation. Very sincerely yours, Robert D. Pulscher President /gf RECENT ADVANCE REFUNDINGS - SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED N.I.C. on Date Refunding Number of Refunded New of Sale Issuer Amount Refunded Issues (old) Issue(s) N.I.C. 4/06/83 City of Willmar, Minnesota $ 3,535,000 2 11.269, 11.832 8.082 4/06/83 City of Willmar, Minnesota 1,290,000 1 11.821 8.010 4/06/83 City of Willmar, Minnesota 850,000 1 11.400 7.750 4/19/83 City of Anoka, Minnesota 2,480,000 2 11.150, 11.635 7.831 4/20/83 City of Champlin, Minnesota 4,000,000 2 11.999, 11.386 8.259 4/21/83 City of Cannon Falls, Minnesota 595,000 1 11.278 8.250 5/02/83 City of Maple Grove, Minnesota 4,190,000 1 10.095 8.124 5/02/83 City of Maple Grove, Minnesota 2,990,000 1 11.997 7.760 5/03/83 City of Bemidji, Minnesota 1,140,000 1 10.227 8.034 5/04/83 City of Marshall, Minnesota 3,200,000 1 9.889 B.' 588 5/05/83 City of Blaine, Minnesota .1,330,000 1 11.132 7.260 5/05/83 City of Blaine, Minnesota 1,000,000 1 10:728 8:006 5/10/83 City of Northfield, Minnesota 685,000 1 10.099 8.010 5/10/83 City of Northfield, Minnesota 600,000 1 10.630 6.770 5/10/83 City of North Mankato, Minnesota 1,940,000 1 10.948 7.292 5/10/83 City of Rice Lake, Wisconsin 2,290,000 1 12.137 8.435 5/12/83 City of Harmony, Minnesota 1,250,000 1 10.064 8.288 5/16/83 City of Moorhead, Minnesota 3,950,000 2 11.859, 9.363 7.807 5/18/83 School District of Osceola, Wisconsin 2,500,000 1 12.656 9.208 5/19/83 City of Rush -City, Minnesota 1,375,000 1 11.335 8.924 5/23/83 City of Red Wing, Minnesota 720,000 1 11.677 8.666 5/23/83 City of Red Wing, Minnesota 495,000 1 11.183 8.562 5/23/83 City of Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota 1,820,000 1 10.533 8.562 5/25/83 City of Lakeville, Minnesota 1,925,000 2 9.934, 9.642 8.538 5/25/83 City of Alexandria, Minnesota 1,100,000 1 11.490 8.068 .7/11/83 Town of Weston, Wisconsin 2,725,000 4 6.000 - 12.000 10.039 8/16/83 City of Waukesha, Wisconsin 2,950,000 1 11.060 7.902 9127/83 Washington County, Minnesota 600,000 1 10.710 7.531 m 1/23/84 City of Billings, Montana 3,435,000 1 11.630 9.069 2 3/01/84 Dodge County, Minnesota 1,700,000 1 10.51 1 1 7.41998 p-0 3/05/84 City of Burnsville, Minnesota 4,000,000 1 9.7163 8.6166.. =� 3/05/84 City of Burnsville, Minnesota 1,475,000 1 10.6910 7.7042 - 3/12/84 City of Worthington, Minnesota 1,350,000 2 10.7156 8.4816 3/12/84 City of Worthington, Minnesota 775,000 1 11.45 8.3502 3/21/84 Sibley County, Minnesota 760,000 1 10.3702 8.2732 N.I.C. on Date Refunding Number of Refunded New of Sale Issuer Amount Refunded Issues (old) Issue(s) N.I.C. 3/23/84 Metropolitan Council, Minnesota 68,800,000 2 10.8641, 9.7410 .9.1 138 3/28/84 City of Milaca, Minnesota 760,000 1 10.669 9.2720 4/03184 Scott County, Minnesota 765,000 1 10.7153 8.116 4/17/84 Swift County, Minnesota 1,210,000 2 1 1.0826, 10.531 8.6323 4/18/84_ Willmar MUC, Minnesota 3,830,000 1 11.6539 9.1298 4/23/84 City of Hastings, Minnesota 650,000 1 11.2518 8.11419 4/24/84 Pine County, Minnesota 1,265,000 1 11.6648 8.3909 5/21184 City of Belle Fourche, South Dakota 595,000 1 11.916 9.125 5/22/84' McLeod County, Minnesota 370,000 1 10.735 9.210 .2/05/85 Proctor ISD 704, Minnesota 8,125,000 1 11.43191 8.5823 2/12/85 Fosston ISD 601, Minnesota 2,480,000 1 11.9966 8.2830 2/25/85 Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota 1,400,000 1 11.1514 8.4336 3/04/85 Brainerd, Minnesota 320,000 1 11.1345 7.8643 3/04/85 Brainerd, Minnesota 740,000 1 10.7643 7.9062 3/19/85 Woupoca, Wisconsin 415,000 1 11.7298 8.14569 4/09/85 MHEFA - College of St. Thomas 8,055,000 2 10.473,10.671 7.8380 6/17/85 Montgomery ISD 394, Minnesota 2,720,000 1 10.1123 7.8508 6/25/85 City of Jackson, Minnesota 800,000 1 10.3597 8.7575 6/25/85 City of Jackson, Minnesota 1,840,000 1 10.3899 8.79989 6/25/85 City of Jackson, Minnesota 910,000 1 10.3778 8.77703 6/27/85 City of Savage, Minnesota 3,750,000 1 10.26693 8.8036 7/01/85 City of Bemidji, Minnesota 800,000 1 10.0115 8.2201 7/01/85 City of Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota 3,540,000 1 9.7010 8.07147 7/01/85 City of Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota 470,000 1 9.8569 8.0835 7/02/85 City of Champlin, Minnesota 2,875,000 1 9.99316 8.5905 7/15/85 City of Burnsville, Minnesota 6,275,000 1 9.4014 8.4202 7/15/85 City of Burnsville, Minnesota 6,000,000 1 9.63284 8.4671 7/15/85 City of Burnsville, Minnesota 3,320,000 1 9.5605 8.5803 7/18/85 City of Cannon Falls, Minnesota 560,000 I - 1.0:033 8.0683 7/18/85 City of Cannon Falls, Minnesota 405,000 2 11.136, 9.959 8.1840 8/06/85 Rusk County, Wisconsin 1,650,000 1 9.819958 8.4238 8/06/85 Marathon County, Wisconsin 21, 000, 000 1 9.1279 8.65798 8/12/85 City of Elk River, Minnesota 2,640,000 5 10.2363,1 1.4046 8.2425 8.9604, 9.1893,8.7957 8/26/85 City of Wausau, Wisconsin 3,600,000 2 10.02302, 8.7872 8.5997 9/03/85 Stanley, Wisconsin 1,310,000 1 10.9666 9.5667 9/16/85 Lakeville, Minnesota 1,300,000 1 10.0893 8.6799 10/08/85 Edgar, Wisconsin 470,000 1 8.697 9.4302 12/09/85 Billings, Montana 6,799,000 10 11.00, 14.07 9.090 THE ADVANCE REFUNDING PROCESS Advance refunding is the replacement of outstanding obligations (the "refunded bonds ") with new, lower interest rate obligations (the "refunding bonds "). The procedure is as follows: I. The proceeds of the refunding bonds are placed into separate escrow accounts and invested in special treasury obligations called State and Local Government Series ( "SLGS "). The overall yield of the SLGS is limited by arbitrage regulations to a rate "not materially higher" than the true interest cost ( "TIC ") of the refunding bonds. The TIC rate is different, and higher than the traditional net interest cost ( "NIC ") rate because the calculation of TIC includes the costs of issuance. It also reflects the timing of the debt service: payments and the settlement date rather than the date of the bonds.: The arbitrage regulations define "materially higher" such that the overall yield on the SLGS may actually exceed the TIC of the refunding bonds by a small amount. The sum of the TIC and the amount by :which we may exceed the TIC is called the yield limit. This yield limit applies only to those obligations acquired from the proceeds of the refunding bonds, the SLGS. 2. ',The outstanding bonds carry a higher NIC than the new bonds. It is obvious that the investment of the new bonds at a lower interest rate will not repay a like amount carrying a higher interest rate. Therefore an additional amount of money must be put into the escrow accounts to supplement the interest rate gap. This is part of what we refer to as "front money." In addition the front money includes accrued interest on the old bonds from their last interest payment date to the date the escrow account is established and part of the costs of issuance and bond discount. The remaining costs of issuance and bond discount are not realized since their inclusion in the TIC computation increases the allowable yield limit and thereby reduces the interest rate gap supplement. 3. The investments in the escrow account are managed by an escrow agent and as principal and interest on the refunded bonds become due, the escrow agent makes the payment. The maturity of principal and interest of the securities in the escrow account are structured so as to provide funds in a timely manner for payments of debt service of the refunded bonds. Creation of the escrow account for the refunded bonds discharges them as an obligation of -the issuer and so at that point they do not count as debt. 4. At the first date of call for the refunded bonds the escrow agent calls all refunded bonds for payment and the bondholders receive full payment for their obligations. 5. The refunding bonds are paid from the same revenue stream as the debt service of the refunded bonds was being paid. 6. When bids for the refunding bonds are opened SPRINGSTED Incorporated will make computations as to: a. The amount of savings, b. The amount of front money, C. The availability and price of unlimited yield securities, d. The costs of issuance, including the underwriting discount, and e. The permitted yield on the limited yield investments. The amount of front money and total savings is sensitive to changes in interest rates. If the rate on the refunding bonds goes up, both the front money requirement and the level of savings is reduced. Conversely, if the rate of the refunding bonds is less the front money and level of savings will increase. 7. Following the sale of the refunding bonds there are several levels of comfort that the refunded bonds can be paid from the escrow account and that.the refunding bonds have been properly issued.. These levels of comfort include: a. SPRINGSTED Incorporated's computation of the details discussed herein. b. An opinion by bond counsel that the refunding bonds comply with all-state and federal requirements. c. An actuarial opinion by an experienced audit firm, certifying that the investments in the escrow, account securities, upon maturity will pay, when due, all remaining principal and interest payments on the refunded. bonds through the date of redemption. 30 - 028 -2y -32 -0023 L o eze -y r N-I i ?[6� << I 6709 Normandale Rd., Edina, MN 55435 May 9, 1986 Edina City Council c/o City Clerk Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN Dear Councilmen: I hereby request that the water main latteral # 306 connection charge of $2357.90 be levied against my property at 6709 Normandale Rd., Edina over a period of six years, at a rate of 7.5 %, payable starting in 1987. Sincerely, Robert J. Seifert T7 T; QM TTTT()TTT BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that it hereby authorizes the assessment of the connection charge for Watermain Improvement No. 306 in the amount of $2,357.90 to be levied against Lot 1, except Highway, Block 1, MALLARD'MANOR SECOND ADDITION over a six year period at the rate of 7.5% payable starting in 1987. ADOPTED this 19th day of May, 1986. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 19, 1986, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 23rd day of September, 1986. City Clerk 1986 CI1. ,F EDINA CHECK RE, ER 05 -19 -86 1 + CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. # MESSAGE 119174 05/06/8E 1209000.00 1ST BANK SOUTHDALE BANK TRANSFER 50- 1010-000-00 MANUAL 119174 05/06/86 1209000.00 - 1ST BANK SOUTHDALE BANK TRANSFER _ °0 -1010- 000 -0,0 MANUAL .00 fliff• ** *-CKS 119368 05/06186 29785.26 MUTUAL BENEFIT DIS PREM 10-4154- 510 -51 MANUAL 119368 05/06/86 29785.26- MUTUAL BENEFIT CORRECTION 10- 4154- 510 -51 MANUAL 119368 05/06186 29785.26 MUTUAL BENEFIT DIS PREM 10- 4158 - 510 -51 MANUAL 29785.26 • CKS a .. Y 122354 05/06/86 336.88 -_ MINNEAGASCO CORRECTION _ 10 -11'0- 000 -00 MANUAL 122354 O5 /OE /86 336.88 MINNEGASCO HEATING 10 -1130- 000 -00 MANUAL a 122354 05/06/8E 336.88 MINNEGASCO HEATING 10 -11!0- 000 -00 MANUAL 122354 441.13 MINNEGASCO HEATING 10 -4254- 446 -44 _ MANUAL 122354 _05/06/8E 05/06/86 _ _ _ 744.65 MINNEGASCO _ HEATING 10- 42`_4- 520 -52 MANUAL 9 122354 05/06/8E 39256.87 MINNEGASCO HEATING 10- 4254 - 540 -54 MANUAL 122354 05/06/8E 71.90 MINNEGASCO HEATING 10- 42 °_4- 629 -62 MANUAL 122354 05/06186 761.58 MINNEGASCO HEATING _ 10 -4254- 646 -64 MANUAL 122354 05/06/86 157.65 MINNEGASCO HEATING 23 -42 °4- 611 -61 MANUAL 122354 05/06/8E 19947.40 MINNEGASCO HEATING 27- 4254 - 661 -66 MANUAL 122354 - 05/06/86----' - -' 131.47-^ MINNEGASCO _ HEATING _ - 21-4254- 662-66 MANUAL 9 122354 05/06/8E 29911.78 MINNEGASCO HEATING 28- 42° -4- 708 -70 MANUAL 122354 05/06/86 179.24 MINNEGASCO HEATING 40 -4254- 801 -80 MANUAL 122354 05/06/8E 19945.87 MINNEGASCO - HEATING 40 -4254- 803 -80 MANUAL 122354 05/06/86 38.00 MINNEGASCO HEATING 50 -42 °4- 821 -82 MANUAL 122354 05/06/8f 61.11 MINNEGASCO HEATING `_0- 42`_4 - 841 -84 MANUAL 122354 05/06/86 _ 147.90 MINNEGASCO _ _ HEATING '- -- 50 -42 °4- 861-86 MANUAL 139133.43 ffrrri - - * **-CKS 122430 05/06/86 209308.66 PERA EMP PORT PERA 10- 4145 - 510 -51 MANUAL - -� -- - 209308.66 . - ffrfrf * ** -CKS 122523 05/06/86 99826.29 STATE TREASURER EMP CONT 10- 4149 - 510 -51 MANUAL 99826.29 • •frirf * ** -CKS 122702 05/06/86 73.53 D 0 E R EMP PORTION 10 -4162- 510 -51 MANUAL 73.53 frrifr * ** -CKS 126391 05/06/86 699.39 _ NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 1130-000 -00 _ _, -- MANUAL 126391 05/06/86 292.12 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 301 -30 MANUAL 126391 05/06/86 139050.32 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10 -4252- 321 -30 MANUAL 126391.115/06/86 STATES ELECTRIC 10- 42`_2- 322 -30 MANUAL 12639 1 05106/86 _ ^- __99925.77_ 29336.02 _NORTHERN NORTHERN STATES - -_- ELECTRIC 10- 4252-330 -30 MANUAL 126391 05/06/86 650.09 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 345 -30 MANUAL 1986 CITY OF EDINA 359.40_ ALBINSON CHECK REGISTER 10 -1900- 260 -26 05 -19 -86 PAGE 2 CHECK N0. DATE _ - -- AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION. - _ - ACCOUNT NO. INV- N P.O. N MESSAGE 126391 05106/8E 58.32 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 358 -30 MANUAL 126391 05/06/86 29033.27 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10 -4252- 375 -30 MANUAL 126391 05/06/86 581.92 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 440 -44 MANUAL 1263.31 05 /0E /8E 43.32 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 460 -46 MANUAL 126391 05/06/86 19066.47 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10 -4252- 520 -52 MANUAL 126391 05/06/86 19320.98 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4152 - 540 -54 MANUAL 126391 05/06/86 449.37 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 42`_2-629 -62 MANUAL 126391 05 /0E /8E 19723.69 _ _ NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 30- 4252 - 646 -64 MANUAL 126391 05/06/86 342.89 NORTHERN STATES - ELECTRIC _ ._. 23 -4252- 611 -61 MANUAL 126391 05106/86 96.20 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 26- 42`2 - 689 -68 MANUAL 126391 05/06/8E 34.19 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 27 -42 °2- 661 -66 MANUAL 126391 05/06/86 _ 166.55 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 27 -4252- 662 -66 MANUAL 126391 05/06/86 29951.23 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 28 -4252- 708 -70 MANUAL 126391 05/06/86 _ NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC,_ 29- 42`2- 721 -72 MANUAL 126591 05/06/86 29201.50 NORTHERN STATES -_ __ ELECTRIC 40- 4252 - 801 -80 MANUAL 126391 05/06/8( 129838.02 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 40- 42252- 803 -80 MANUAL 126391 - 05 /CE /8E -_ 174.08 �_ _NORTHERN STATES _ ELECTRIC 40 -42 °2- 804 -80 MANUAL 126391 05/06/86 _ 480.12 NORTHERN STATES _ _ _ ELECTRIC _ 50 -42 °2- 821 -82 _ MANUAL 126391 05 /0E /8E 812.63 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC °0 -4252- 841 -84 MANUAL 126391 05/06/8E 378.04 _NORTHERN NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC - = 0 -91 °2- 861 -86 MANUAL 549992.67 t - - -- - 126415 05/06/86 79919.30 79919.30 • MEO CENTER 129110 OS /OB /8E _ 91.60 - DAVIOSEN DIST INC 91.00 CITY PORT HOSP INVENTORY -- - - - * ** -CKS 10 -4156- 510 -51 MANUAL ** *-CKS 50- 4630- 822 -82 - * ** -CKS 139003­­ - - 05/09/86 359.40_ ALBINSON CAPITAL OUTLAY 10 -1900- 260 -26 359.40 139004 05/12/8E _ 146.87 AMERICAN LINEN _ LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 440 -44 139004 139004 05/12/8E 05/12/86 6.63 AMERICAN LINEN .__ _ LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 482 -48 23.68 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 42E22- 520 -52 139004 05/12/8E _ _ 130.32_ AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 520 -52 139004 05/12/86 130.32 AMERICAN LINEN - LAUNDRY -,- 10 -4262- 522 -52 139004 05/12/86 130.32- AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 522 -52 139004 05/09/86 -_ 11.50 ___..AMERICAN AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 628 -62 139004 05/09/86 23.65 AMERICAN LINEN ___.- ,__ - LAUNDRY 27- 4262- 661 -66 139004 05/12/8E 28.09 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY `0 -42E2- 821 -82 139004 _ 05/12/86 48.35_ _ a - AMERICAN LINEN 50 -4262- 841 -84 139004 05/12/86 43.39 AMERICAN LINEN - _LAUNDRY _ _ _ _ _ LAUNDRY T - ' -50 -4262- 861 -86 - 462.48 • 139005 05/09/86 37.25 AUDIO GROUP ADVERTISING `_0 -4214- 822 -82 139005 05/09/86 37.25 AUDIO GROUP ADVERTISING 50- 4214- 862 -86 - ._._. - - -- - - -- -- - - -- - - - --- -- 74.50 139006 05/14/86 130.25 AQUA ENGINEERING PLANTING 8 TREES 50- 4560 - 841 -84 2681 r 1986 Cl F EDINA CHECK R, !ER 05-19-86 E 3 'CHECK'NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO* INV. A P.O. 4 MESSAGE ii 139031 05/09/8E 81.60. BERTELSOh BROS INC GEN SUPPLIES 81.60 v ---------------- ***—CKS ***—CKS ***—CKS ***—CKS s*­CKS ***—CKS • 130.25 139007 05/09/86 25.00 i APEX PEST CONTROL GEN SjPO'- 28-4504-708-70 22104 25.00 139008 05/14/84 13.92 KAMAN -BEARING & SPLY REPAIR PARTS 13:92 • 139012 05/12/8E 24.95 AUTOMOBILE SERVICE C CONT REPAIRS 10-4248-;-560-56 24.95 139013 05/09f86 68.84 ALTERNATCR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-560-56 1038 139013 05/09/86 56.85 ALTERNATCR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 10-45C4-646-64 1038 125.69 139015 05/1218E 89.29 AT & T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 10-4256-510-51 139015 05/12/86 52.34 - AT & T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 23-42!6-611-61 139015 05/12/86 71.99 AT & T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 27-4256-611-66 213.62 fffffr 139018 05/12f86 9-09 AT 8 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 10-42!6-628-62 9.09 139025 05/13/8( 14.00 ALFONS AhOERSSON CONT SERV 27-4200-661-66 14.00 139026 05/14/86 29915.60 BADGER. METER INC INVENTORY METERS——. 40-1220-000-00 441060 131026 05/09/86 ' - 67 29_ ----BADGER METER INC REPAIR PARTS 40-4540-807-80 29982:89 139028 05/13/86 - 818.50 BEER WHOLESALERS CONCESSIONS 27-4620-664-66 139028 05/08/8E 19529.40 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTORY 50-4630-822-82 139028 05/09/86 29976:95 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTORY 50-46!0-842-84 139028 05/08/BE 39233.15 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTORY !0-4630.-862-86 8058.00 139029 05/13/8E 253.45 BERG & FARNHAM CO GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-301-30 8825 139029- 05/13/8E _ 217b _BERG & FARNHAM CO'-'--'—tEN SUPLY - —_ 10 -4504- 301 -30 8944 139029 05113/86 496:80 BERG & FARNHAM CO GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-642-64 8893 771.95 • ii 139031 05/09/8E 81.60. BERTELSOh BROS INC GEN SUPPLIES 81.60 v ---------------- ***—CKS ***—CKS ***—CKS ***—CKS s*­CKS ***—CKS • 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER C5 -19 -86 PAGE 4 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENOCR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. 9 P.O. # MESSAGE l •ftfri - 139033 05/14/86 184.50- BERGFORD TRUCKING CORRECTION 50- 4626- 822 -82 ^� 139033 05/14/86 52.60 BERGFORO TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626 - 822 -82 !' 139033 05/14/86 184.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50 -4626- 822 -82 - 139033 05/14/86 184.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50 -4626- 822 -82 139033 05/14/86 184.90 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626- 842 -84 _ 139033 05 /14 /8E 271.80 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626-842 -84 139033 05/14/86 174.70 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50 -4626- 862 -86 139033 05/19/86 174.70 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626 - 862 -86 139033 05/14/86 _ - 174.70- BERGFORD TRUCKING CORRECTION 50- 4626- 862 -86 139033 05/14/86 225.00 BERGFORO TRUCKING INVENTORY 50 -4626- 862 -86 - - - -- -- --•- - 19093.50 i' -Iv 999999...- __ ___ __ 1 #9038 _ 05/14/86 •� 100.00 _ _ _ GEORGE BUTLE R - _ . _.__ POLICE SERY --- 10- 4100 - 420 -42 -� -i 100.00 • i 139039 05/09/86 435.16 BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC FILL MATERIAL 10 -4518- 345-30 - 435.16 • 9999►• - •- - - - -•- ._._ _ ._ ._- .-_... -- _. _ I, 139041 05/14/86 _ . . 252.85__ -�- BURY B CARLSON INC BLACKTOP __- 10 -4524- 301 -30 139041 05/05/86 _ 657.66 BURY 8 CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 10 -4524- 301 -30 139041 05/14/86 89275.98 BURY B CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 314 -30 _ 139U41 05/14/86 79275.98 BURY B CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 10 -4524- 314 -30 139041 - 05/14/86 79275.98- BURY B CARLSON INC _ CORRECTION 10- 4524- 314 -30 - 139041 05/09/86 252.85 BURY 8 CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 40 -4524- 803 -80 139041 05/14/86 220.80 BURT 8 CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 40 -4524- 803 -80 99660.14 • - 139053 05/08/86 141.39 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 10 -4250- 301 -30 139053 05/08/86 43.56 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 10 -4250- 446 -44 139053 05/08/86 58.65 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 10 -4250- 520-52 y 'I 139053 05/08/86 141.39 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 10- 4250- 540 -54 139053 05/08/86 77.27 FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 10- 42`_0- 628 -62 139053 05/08/86 _ _ 108.72 __BROWNING BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION - _ 10- 4250 - 646 -64 ti. 139053 05/08/8E 54.86 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 10- 4250-646 -64 139053 05/08/8E _ _ - 10.88 BROWNING FERRIS - _ REFUSE COLLECTION 23 -42_0- 611 -61 j 139053 05/O8/8E 574.50 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 27 -4250- 661 -66 �- 139053 05/08/86 74.87 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 21 -4250- 662 -66 139053 05/08/86 140.84_ BROWNING FERRIS _REFUSE COLLECTION 28- 4250-708 -70 139053 05/08/8£ 279.17 _ _ BROWNING FERRIS - _ - REFUSE COLLECTION V - _ - 50 -4250- 841 -84 139053 05/08/86 442.52 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION °_0 -4250- 861 -86 139054 05/09/86 148.84 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 27721 139054 18.48 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR_PARAT_S 10 -4540- 560 -56 32584 I' 139054 05/09/86 26.46 BATTERY WAREHOUSE - REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 _ 30186 -I r, { 139054 05/09/86 78.42 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 25341 w ••• -CKS 999 -CKS •••-CKS ••• -CKS 1986 C OF EDINA CHECK f .TER 05 -19 -86 GE 5 CHECK' N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. 4 MESSAGE •�•I 139054 05/09/86 122.92 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 24832 139054 05/09/86 30.61 _ BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARATS 10 -4540- 560 -56 31111 • ! 139054 05/09181 5.00 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS _ 10- 4540 - 560 -56 25290 • 430.73 + ** *-CKS 139058 05/14/8E 100.00 WAYNE BENNETT POLICE SERV 10 -4100- 420 -42 100.00 t - • + f k f f + * ** -CKS 139060 05/09/86 "' 174.40 " AMBASSADCR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 27 -4E24- 664 -66 139060 05/13/86 127.45 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 664 -66 301.85 • *rffff • - - _ _ - - - -- - - -- -- *** -CKS • 139064 05/13/86 82.64 THERMAL CO CONT REPAIRS 28 -4248- 707 -70 F75604 82.64 • • • rff r.r ••• -CKS � 139073 05/08/8( ^- -- 29.53 CITY BEER - INVENTORY - 50 -4630- 822 -82 • 139073 05/09/86 206.85 CITY BEER INVENTORY °0 -4620- 842 -84 139073 05/08/86 131.65 _. _._ CITY BEER INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 862 -86 • 368.03 • 139074 05/08/86 - 19250.00 -ii - CITY OF ELOOMINGTON -- -- - CONT SERY 10 -4200- 480 -48 055074 19250.00 • 139075 05/12/8E 25.58 CLANCY DRUG INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 • 25.58 • rrr * *r r ** -CKS • 139078 05/12/8( 193.95 COCA COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50 -4672- 822 -82 139078 05/09/86 - -� 860.95 - -- COCA COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50- 4632- 842 -84 139078 05/12/86 897.25 COCA COLA BOTTLING --- - INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 862 -86 • 19952.15 + •••-CKS • 139080 05/13/86 181.27 - _ CONT -MINK GEN SUPPLIES 27- 4504- 661 -66 139080 05/13/8E 102.53 CONT -MINK _ CLEAN SUPPLIES 27 -4512- 661 -66 139080 05/09/8E 163.71 CONT -MINK CONCESSINS 27 -4E24- 664 -66 139080 _ 05/13/86 19237.79 CON-MINK NT T- CONCESSINS 27 -4624- 664 -66 • -. - - - - - -- - - - • *•• -CKS 139095 05/13/86 413.27 COMMISSIONER REVENUE GASOLINE 10- 4612 - 560 -56 _ 413.27 + * *•-CKS ----- -- ----- - - - - -- -- 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -19 -86 PAGE 6 , I CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR - -- _ ITEM DESCRIPTION — ACCOUNT NO. _INV. N P.O. # MESSAGE - 139097 05/12/86 ___ 144.00 „-- ___- __COURTNEY C WAYNE _ _. CONFERENCE_. - 10- 4202 - 140 -14 . 139097 05/13/86 30.49 COURTNEY C WAYNE MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 100 -10 I 174.49 `- --- - fttttt -- - -- - -- -------- -T_, -- ttt-CKS 13909_9 .05/09/86 19361.00 CUSHMAN POTOR CO CAPITAL_- OUTLAY 10 -4500- 600 -60 15429 'I 19361.00 + ttt*tr t ** -CKS 139106 05/14/8E 100.00 DAHL- MR HILDING POLICE SERY 10- 4100 - 420 -42 100.00 ltrtttt +•• -CKS 139114 05/09/86 T — 355.30 — DAVIOSEN DIST INC INVENTORY 50-4630-842-84 355.30 *t* -CKS 05/14/86 538.65_ MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPP _ 10- 4504 - 520 -52 14058 _139125 139125 - 05/09/86 _ _ - 199.50 _ MERIT SUPPLY PAINT 10 -4544- 325 -30 14446 139125 05109/86 932.25 MERIT SUPPLY CHEMICALS 10 -4564- 352 -30 14460 139125 05/09/86 437.25 MERIT SUPPLY PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 14461 139125 _ 05/09/86 117.15 _ MERIT SUFPLY PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 14480 139125 05/09/86 451.50 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLY 28- 4512- 708-70 14495 29676.30 • `.• 139126 05/14/86 175.87 DAVIS EUGENE WEED CONTROL 60- 4100- 985 -90 139126 05/14/86 _ 47.84 DAVIS-,. EUGENE MILEAGE _- _. _ 60 -4208- 985 -90 223.71 • tttttt +** -CKS ti. 139134 05109/86 36.75 CITYWIDE SERVICES CONT REPAIRS 50- 4248 - 841 -84 36.75 • .r I rtrtrt ttt -CKS 139136 05/09/86 215.00 EARL F ANDERSEN SIGNS B POSTS 10 -4542- 325 -30 215.00 * a I rrtrtt - ++*-CKS ` 139143 05/13/86 BAKING CO__ _ — CONCESSINS _ _ ___ -- - __27- 4624 - 664 -66 139143 05109/86 _147.86_ 95.98 _EMRICH EMRICH BAKING CO CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 664 -66 �- i. 243.84 rr�ttt t** -CKS , 139146 05/14/86 57.25 GREEN ACRES SPKL -- �- __�_..- CONT REPAIRS ..•- -- — 10- 4148 - 642 -64 _._... _..,. -_.._..__...._....__.-- 57.25 • w trtttt tt*-CKS 1'986 C. lF EDINA CHECK R TER 05 -19 -86 iE 7 • `CHECK'NO. DATE AMOUNT VENOCR ITEM DESCRIPTION T ACCOUNT NO. INV. C P.O. N MESSAGE , 139148 05/13/86 11.60 SAFETY SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 449 -44 11.60 ` — `ELVIN — -- a ttrff* ** *-CKS 139162 05/13/86 13.19 FOWLER ELECTRIC REPAIR PART S 10 -4540- 560 -56 51634 139162 05/09/86 36.61 FOWLER ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 21 -4540- 663 -66 52056 139162 05/13/86 56.06 _ FOWLER ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540-663 -66 52277 105.86 + rttt *r r** -CKS 139175 05/09/86 65.15 FRITZ CO CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 664 -66 65.15 + • Y tffftt - — -- ---- - -.. -- ** *-CKS r 139183 05/12/86 29.73 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504- 708-70 64055 29.73 • fffrtf * **- CKS it 139188 05/14/86 _ 9- .25 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO CONSTRUCTION -' 27 -1300- 000 -00 9.25 + W ** *-CKS 4. W 139194 05/12/8E 100.00 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS SERY CONTRACTS 10 -4268- 420 -42 22933 - 139194 05/13/8E 70.00---' GENERAL COMMUNICATNS RADIO SERV 10- 4294 - 440 -44 22931 r 139194 05/14/86 100.80 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS RADIO SERVICE 10 -4294- 440 -44 64005 139194 05/13/86 300.00 GENERAL- COMMUNICATNS RADIO EQUIP 10- 4914 - 440 -44 570.80 • - - * **-CKS 139206 05/09/86 706.60 G 8 K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 301 -30 139206 05/09/86 211.90 - ,. 6 B K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 560 -56 r 139206 05/09/86 227.00 G B K SERVICES LAUNDRY - 10 -4262- 646 -64 r 139206 05/09/8E 113.60 G 6 K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10- 4512- 540 -54 139206 0 5/09/8 6 272.60 G 8 K SERVICES - LAUNDRY 40 -42E2- 801 -80 r 19531.70 t_._..-�- r f *rr *r ***-CKS IV 139209 05/09/86 16.65 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARA7S 10- 4540- 560 -56 368204 139209 _ 05/09/86 _ 95.37 ._ GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 361516 139209 05/05/86 73.63 GENUINE PARTS _ _ __ REPAIR PARATS __10- 4540 - 560 -56 367639 y 139209 05/09/86 110.00- GENUINE PARTS CREDIT 30 -4540- 560 -56 365868 75.65 • r *ftf *t *f *-CKS � 139213� _ 05/19/86 -- 120.00 LEROY H LIBBY _ CONT 8ERV i0 -4200- 800 -80 ''- ir, 120.00 • ti 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -19 -86 PAGE 9 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR _ _ _ —^ ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT- _N0.•INV. -# P.O. N MESSAGE 139214 05/13/86 42.49 _ TOLL COMPANY GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 325 -30 030380 °I 139214 05/13/86 42.70 TOLL COMPANY GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 325 -30 030874 139214 05/13/86 52.33 TOLL COMPANY TOOLS 10 -4580- 301 -30 030446 139214 05/13/86 58.80 TOLL COMPANY WELDING SUPP 10 -4610- 560 -56 454241 139214 _ 05/13/86- _ _ 99.82 TOLL COMPANY WELDING SUPPLIES 10 -4610- 560 -56 451567 139214 05/13/8E 234.05 TOLL COMPANY WELDING SUPPLIES 30 -4610- 560 -56 287649 139214 05/13/8E 61.95 _ _- - ..TOLL COMPANY WELDING SUPPLIES 10- 4610- 560 -56 700358 139214 05/13/86 158.25 TOLL COMPANY WELDING SUPPIES 10 -4610- 560 -56 285082 139214 05/13/8E 20.95 TOLL COMPANY GEN SUPP 40 -4504- 801 -80 030446 771.34 + rrk *rr 139220 05/13/8E 110.60 HAR NED LUMBER CO CONST 27- 1300-000 -00 97840 .I 139220 05113/86 317.05 HAR NED LUMBER CO CONST 27 -1:00- 000 -00 97646 I -� 427.65 kkrr *k 139222 05/09/8E 66.21 HEDBERG 8 SONS CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504-301 -30 66.21 • 139228 05/14/86 41.88 _HILLSTROP AUTO SUP Y GEN SUPP 10 -4504- 560 -56 139228 05/14/86 19736.03 - HILLSTROP AUTO SUP Y REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 139228 05/14/86 71.70 HILLSTROP AUTO SUP Y TOOLS 10 -4580- 560 -56 139228 05/14/86 AUTO SUP Y PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 139228 _ 05/14/86 ___175.56 175.78 __HILLSTROP HILLSTROM. AUTO SUP Y PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 139228 05/14/86 175.56- HILLSTROM.AUTO SUP Y PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 139228 05/13/86 134.72 -- .- HILLSTROM AUTO SUP Y• REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 662 -66 i 29160.11 v 139234 05114/86 56.93 HOOTEN CLEANERS LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 420 -42 139234 05/14/86 6.00 HOOTEN_CLEANERS _ LAUNDRY _ _ __•___ „_. 10 -4262- 440 -44 -_ f J -_ 62.93 • *fkkr 139242 05/13/86 53.53 HYDRAULIC SERV EQUIP MAINT 27 -4214- 662 -66 22827 53.53 + i krkrkt 139244 05/09/86 139245 05/13/86 I a 139248 05/12/86 19206-DD 19200.00 475.00- 475.00 HAYDEN MURPHY ROBERT 8 HILL- 16.00 HARMON GLASS T GEN SUPPLIES _ - -- -� - -- -BAIT CONT REPAIRS , 40 -4504- 813 -80 28- 4538- 708 -70 10- 4248- 560 -56 111060 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS ** *-CKS * **-CKS * ** -CKS ** *-CKS •1986 l OF EDINA CHECK STER 05 -19 -8L AGE 9 v CHECK NO. DATE _ - AMOUNT YENOCR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. A RESSAGE , 139248 05/12/86 26.07 MARMON GLASS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560-56 111044 42.07 y 139249 05/14/86 100.00 WILLIAM EOFFMAN POLICE SERY 10- 4100- 420 -42 100.00 99999• * ** -CKS p 139277 05/12/86 279.85 CARLSON FRINTING PRINTING 28-4600- 706 -70 34855 r " 279.85 + 139278 05/09/86 18.76 - JERRYS FCODS GEN SUPP 27 -4504- 661 -66 139278 05/09/86 31.35 JERRYS FOODS CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 664 -66 50.11 0 139279 05/12/8E 46.24 JERRYS OLR OWN HDWE CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 560 -56 139279 05/12/86 18.89 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 260 -26 139279 05/12/86 _ _ �- - 10.24 - JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4!04- 301 -30 139279 05/12/86 44.16 JERRYS CUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 325 -30 139279 05/12/86 26.99 - JERRYS -.-JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4104- 328 -30 139279 05/12/8E 7.39 OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 420 -42 r 139279 05/12/86 44.75 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 440 -44 139279 05/12/8E - 10.73 JERRYS CLR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4!04- 520 -52 139279 05/12/86 325.67 _ _ _ _ JERRYS OLR OWN HOWE _ GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 646 -64 r, 139279 05/12/8E 5.91 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 720 -72 139279 05/12/86 31.97 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4512- 540 -54 i 139279 05/12/8E 11.18 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4540 - 520 -52 139279 05/12/86 21.75 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4540 - 560 -56 139279 05/12/86 170.00 JERRYS OLR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4540 - 646 -64 r 139279 05/12/86 11.16 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 661 -66 1. 139279 05/12/86 47.46 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE CLEANING SUPPLIES 27- 4512 - 661 -66 139279 05/12/86 74.94 _ JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 27 -4540- 661 -66 139219 05/12/86 14.41 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 27- 4540- 662 -66 r, 139279 05/12/86 2.48 JERRYS OLR OWN HDWE PAINT 27 -4544- 661 -66 139279 05/12/81 1.69 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE CLEANING SUPPLIES 27 -45EO- 661 -66 139279 05/12/86 55.23'-.- JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE CLEANING SUPPLIES 27 -4620- 662 -66 yr 139279 05/12/8E 10.21 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 28 -4504- 708 -70 r 139279 05/12/86 36.26 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 40 -4504- 801 -80 139279 05/12/8E 4.24 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE _ _ GEN SUPPLIES - - 40- 4540-801 -80 y 139279 05/12/86 96.69 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 40 -4160- 803 -80 q 19130.64 + Y ttr*rt * ** -CKS 139784 05/12/86 99.00 BUSINESS'FURNITURE, INC. LAMP 8 FIX 27 -4606- 661 -66 y 99.00 a rrr -CKS 139286 05/12/86 229.20 _ _ JUSTUS J LUMBER CONSTRUCTIN 27 -1300- 000 -00 139286 05/12/86 46.59 JUSTUS _ LLMBER _ _ _ _ CONSTRUCTIN 27 -1:00- 000 -00 27372 y 139286 05/1218E 38.95 JUSTUS LLMBER CNSTRUCTION 27 -1300- 000 -00 25365 139286 05/12/8E _ _ 45.44 JUSTUS LUMBER CONSTRUCTION 27 -13CO- 000 -00 27423 139286 05/12/86 42.80 JUSTUS LUMBER -----C ONSTRUCTION �27- 1300 = 000 -00 26777--'--- _ 402.98 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -19 -86 PAGE 10 1 • CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION _- ACCOUNT -NO.-INV. N -P.O.- 0 MESSAGE * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS • ** -CKS ** *-CKS d * ** -CKS II ** *-CKS * ** -CKS 139289 05/14/86 100.00 WALTER JOHNSON POLICE SERV 10- 4100 - 420 -42 j 100.00 • 139300 05/14/86 164.25 KOKESH ATHLETIC UNIFORM ALLOW 26- 4266 - 688 -68 A67385 164.25 • 139302 05/14/86 3�Ob9.05 KUETHER LIST CO INVENTORY __- 50- 460-822 -82 139302 05/14/86 49433.57 _ __ KUETHER CIST CO INVENTORY 50 -4630- 842 -84 79502.62 • I � rrrrr* 139304 05/13/86 121.49 KNOX LUMBER CO -. _._. FOG SKATING 10 -2235- 000 -00 447523 - -� 139304 05/13/86 _ - 11.70 _ KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPP 10 -4504- 318 -30 447359 139304 05/13/86 18.49 KNOX LUMBER CO CONST 27 -1300- 000-00 447571 139304 05/13/86 45.76 KNOX LUMEER CO CONST _ _ 27- 1:00- 000 -00 457167 _ 139304 05/13/86 _ 14.96 KNOX LUMBER CO CONST 27 -1300- 000 -00 447644 139304 05/13/86 113.77 KNOX LUMBER CO CONST 27 -1?CO- 000 -00 447128 139304 05/13/86 55.74 _ _ - KNOX LUMBER CO CONST 27 -1300- 000 -00 447585 139304 05/13/8E _ 157.43 KNOX LUMEER CO CONST 27 -1300- 000 -00 441314 139304 05/13/86 19147.47 KNOX LUMBER CO CONST 27 -1300- 000 -00 v 139304 05/14/86 3.59 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER 21- 4604- 661 -66 447343 139304 _ 05/14/8E _ _ - -72.75 - KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER 27 -4604- 661 -66 447342 139304 05/12/8E 3.54 KNOX LUMEER CO GEN SUPPLIES 28 -4504- 708 -70 361123 139304 05/12/86 5.04 ----''-KNOX- _ KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 708 -70 353244 19771.73 . rrrrrr „ 139311 05/09/86 69408.50 EASTSIDE BEVERAGE INVENTORY 50 -4630- 842 -84 139311 05/08/86 89088.65 _--- EASTSIDE BEVERAGE INVENTORY _ _ - 50- 4630 - 862 -86 y i 149497.15 • rrrrrr 139313 05/14/8E 356.00 JOHN H FOSTER REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540- 801 -80 356.00 • �„ rrrrrr 139315 05/14/86 158.92 ANCHOR PAPER PAPER SUPP 10 -4514- 520 -52 230489 158.92 • y _� 139317 LAWSON PRODUCTS_ -___ GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 322 -30 139317 05/09/86 _231.64 240.78 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4 °04- 325 -30 139317 05/09/86 63.45 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 328 -30 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS • ** -CKS ** *-CKS d * ** -CKS II ** *-CKS * ** -CKS 1986 Cl F EDINA CHECK R. !ER 05 -19 -86 E 11 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDCR ITEM DESCRIPTION OCCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. 4 MESSAGE 139317 05/09/86 110.21 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 139317 05/09/86 420.70 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 19066.78 f. - -- -- -- _ -- - -.. 139318 05/09/86 124.75 LEEF BROS INC INVENTORY 10 -4262- 440 -44 , 139318 '05/09/86 --- --- ----- `-14:88 - - -�— LEEF EROS -INC­- - - -'- LAUNDRY _- ' -.- -27 -4262- 662 -66 1r 139.63 • , ++f-CKS 139323 05/13/86 5.00 LINHOFF PHOTO SUPPLIES 10 -4508- 440 -44 - - -- - 5.00 .-`- - rrtrrt rff-CKS v, 139325 05/12/86 7.50 LONG LAKE FORD TRACT REPAIR PARTS 30- 4540- 646 -64 034186 7.50 + L ttrrtr + ++ -CKS 139329 05/09/86 49129.00 LAYNE MINNESOTA CO CONT REPAIRS 40 -4248- 801 -80 49129.00 - rrr -CKS r 139332 05/08/86 29518.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES DUES 10- 4204 - 140 -14 29518.00 + r rrrtfr a 139336 05/13/86 47.30 LANCE CONCESSIONS 27- 4624- 664 -66 47.30 + y 139337 05109/86 244.37 LAKE STATE EQUIP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 244.37 r y, ttrfff rrr-CKS 139343 05/13/8E - 61.71 MINNESOTA GLOVE GEN SUPP 30- 4504 - 560 -56 5608 y, 61.71 139344 05/13/86 29.00 - MEO OXYGEN 8 EQUIP EQUIP MAINT 10- 4214- 449 -44 y 139344 05/13/86 12.60 MEO OXYGEN 8 EQUIP EQUIP MAINT 10- 4214- 449 -44 139344 05113/8E -- 45.41 - - NED OXYGEN 8 EQUIP 1ST AID SUPPLIES 10 -4510- 440 -44 87.01 r __... - er ffftff - - -.. - --- -- -- - -- .__. - -- - - -- rrr -CKS y 139346 05/12/86 92.48 MET N WASTE C L COMM GEN SUPPLIES 28 -4504- 707 -70 3529 92.48 + y 9!999! + ++ -CKS - -- 139358 05/09/86 - - - 129.- 19 - 3M ALARM SERVICE - ALARM SERY 23 -4J04- 610 -61 y 129.19 + o� 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -19 -86 PAGE 12 - CHECK NO. DATE _ _ AMOUNT _ _ VENDOR - ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT - NO. ,.INV- N P.O. 11 MESSAGE t 139359 05/13/86 20.72 MINN TORO INC GEN SUPP, _..•__•___,.- 10 -4504- 318 -30 050640 139359 05/13/8E _ 6.80 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 050640 139359 05/13/86 109.08 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTAS 10- 4540- 560 -56 050640 136.60 • 139360 05/13/86 90.00 MINNESOTA WANNER CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 062737 139350 05/14/86 6.40 MINNESOTA WANNER REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 642 -64 062907 139360 05/13/86 _ 77.60 _ MINNESOTA WANNER GEN SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 803 -80 062581 174.00 • _ -- °- - -- - -- - - -- -- - - - - ,__ - CKS 139365 05/14/86 100.00 _ _ -_BURT MERFELD POLICE SERV. _ -_ 10 -4100- 420 -42 100.00 139366 05/08/8E 51.65 MINNESOTA BAR INVENTORY 50 -4632- 822 -82 139366--'- 05/09/8E _ _ 670.58 _ MINNESOTA BAR INVENTORY 50- 4632- 842 -84 139366 05/08/86 377.48 MINNESOTA BAR INVENTORY 50 -4632- 862 -86 *. ** -CKS 139 "337 _ 05/09/86 _ 49540.78 - CARLSON'S LAKE'STATE EQUIP CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 49540.78 * 139378 05/08/8E 59400.85 MARK VII SALES INVENTORY 50 -4630- 822 -82 139.378 05/09/86 69627.38 MARK VII SALES INVENTORY 50 -4630- 842 -84 4 V 139378 05/08/86 7,201.15 MARK VII SALES INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 862 -86 199229.38 139379 05/09/86 31.50 -METRO FONE COMM EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226- 301 -30 213245 31.50 • - 139380 05/13/86 99736.80 THOMSEN NYBECK SER LEGAL - 10 -4100- 220 -22 - 99736.80 139381 05/09/8E - 167.40 -_STAR 8 TRIBUNE ADVERTISING 10- 4210- 420 -42 167.40 • * * *rr* • *• -CKS 139388 05/13/86 53.82 NTL ATOMIK MOTOR REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 282729 139388 05/13/86 2.77 ATOMIK MOTOR REPAIR PARTS _ 10- 4540 - 560 -56 281535 _ 139388 05/13/86 18.24 NTL ATOMIK MOTOR REPAIR PARATS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 282684 74.83 • * * ** *r--- -- - --- * **-CKS 139400. ._ _ 05/13/86 _ _ 987.23. _ NORTHWESTERN -TIRE _CO.. ,- _TIRES & TUBES_ .__________._ 10 -4616- 560 -56 . 987.23 • * *r ** * ** -CKS I �j l 139413 05/09/86 197.01 NATIONWIDE PAPERS GEN SUPP 27 -4504- 661 -66 044826 1986 C OF EDINA CHECK STER 05 -19 -8e .GE 13 •v CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENOCR — ITEM DESCRIPTION -- - -- - -- — - ACCOUNT N0. INY. - - -- -- p P.O. M MESSAGE 197.01 + i. -._ _....._..___ ..._.- -- _...._ # ## -CKS v 139417 05/09/86 201.35 OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600- 180 -18 26465 201.35 --------- .�__T_. —. -- - -- v *kf iir * ** —CKS 139420 05/13/86 213.87 OLD DUTCH FOODS CONCESSINS 27 -4624- 664 -66 213.87 + ** *-CKS 139429 05/13/86 772.90 J PEPSI COLA BOTTLING CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 664 -66 ` 139429 05/08/8E 306.60 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50 -4630- 862 -86 139429 05/08/8E __ 321.05_ PEPSI COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY °0 -46:2- 822 -82 139429 05/08/8E _ - 455.70 _ PEPSI COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 842 -84 d, 19856.25 * ** -CKS 139434 05/13/86 _ 61.60 - - -- PRINTERS SERVICE INC -- EQUIP MAINT 28 -4274- 707 -70 2057 61.60 • fk *iri * ** -CKS 133441 05/08/86 113.00 THE PRINT SHOP PROGRAMS 10- 4600- 140 -14 139441 05/09/8E - - - 218.45 -. THE PRINT SHOP �_.. PRINTING 10- 4600 - 628 -62 63552 331.45 r ffrf ## - - - * ** -CKS y� 139443 05/13/86 19976.85 POMMER MFG CO COMMODITIES 10 -4500- 500 -50 46306 1,976.85 ** *-CKS 139445 05112/86 819.90 —. -PAPER CALMENSON 6 CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4 °_04- 318 -30 367114 v 819.90 *** —CKS V 139450 05/12/86 66.74 P8E CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248- 560 -56 19416 139450 05/12/86 35.18 PBE REPAIR PARTS 30 -4540- 560 -56 139450 05/09/86 80.15 PBE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 182.67 + ti *ftr #* ** *-CKS 139452 05/09/86 24.24 - QUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR JPARTS — 30- 4540 - 560 -56 08882 139452 05/09/86 43.68 QUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR PARTS 10 -4590- 560 -56 08934 139452 _ 05/09/86 - _ _ 73.20_ _QUICK SERV BATTERY PARTAS 30- 4540 - 560 -56 07102 139452 05/09/86 45.60 QUICK SERY BATTERY _REPAIR REPAIR PARTS —10 -4540- 560 -56 _ 07107' 139452 05/09/86 31.20 QUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 'r 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -19 -86 PAGE 14 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT _ VENOGR ITEM DESCRIPTION - ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. # MESSAGE 139452 05/09/86 73.94 QUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 08405 291.86 II �� *rrrrr ** *-CKS ` „I ! 139460 05/12/86 - - - - -- 36.30 - _ -. - ROYAL CROWN BEY INVENTORR -- --- - -- -- -_ 50 -4632- 822 -82 139460 05/09/8E 177.80 ROYAL CROWN BEV INVENTORY 50 -4632- 842 -84 ` 139460 OS/1218E 126.60 ROYAL CROWN BEV INVENTORY _____.50- 4632 - 862 -86 340.70 CKS 139462 05/13/8E 401.95 RENTAL EGUIP B SALES TOOLS 10 -4580- 353 -30 3697 139462 05/13/86 - 495.00 _ RENTAL EQUIP 8 SALES__ __ TOOLS _- _. , 10 -4560- 353 -30 3703 896.95 * ` 139463 05/13/86 39524.10 REX DIST INVENTORY -,50 -4630- 842 -84 13946 3 T 05/13/86 _ __ 29516.55 __- -. REX DIST INVENTORY 50 -4630- 862 -86 69040.65 • *rrrrr r ** -CKS 139470 05/14/8( 25.00 DR ROCKWELL POLICE SERV 10- 4100 - 481 -48 _.._ 25.00 * -- .. *r *rr* * ** -CKS 139482 05/09/86 109.43 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES CONT SERV 27 -4200- 662 -66 109.43 + *rrr ** * *r -CKS 139485 05/12/86 29494.22 STATE BLLG INSP BLDG PERMITS 10 -3095- 000 -00 139485 05/12/86 78.00 STATE BLCG INSP SUR CHG TAX 10 -3113- 000 -00 29572.22.,* �. 139486 05/13/8E 199.50 DON STREICHER GUNS GEN SUPP 10- 4504- 646 -64 M34263 139486 05/09/8E _ 26.50._______, DON STREICHER GUNS AMMUNITION 10- 4572 - 420 -42 M34252 226.00 rr *rrr * ** -CKS J 139490 05/12/86 57.45 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTIN 27 -1300- 000 -00 139490 05/12/86 _34.47 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTIN 27 -1300- 000 -00 139490 05/12/86 61 -95 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTIN 27 -1200- 000 -00 _ 139490 05/12/86 20.93 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTIN 27 -1!00- 000 -00 z 139490 05/14/8E 104.90 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 27 -4544- 661 -66 139490 05/09/8E 172.50 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 28- 4544 - 708 -10 _ 452.20 * 6 rr *rrr * **-CKS 05/13/8E 7.02 SOUTHDALE FORD _____REPAIR PARATS 10-4540-560-56.116893 _ _139492 139492 05/13/86 - 194.02 SOUTHDALE FORD �- REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 116700 ` 139492 ;I 05/13/81 7.02 SOUTHOALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 116561 1986 C. OF EDINA CHECK V .TER 05 -19 -86 GE 15 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE v, 139492 05/13/86 177.74 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 117190 ` 139492 05/13/86 88.87 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 116380 ' 474.67 • -_ - -.. __.. _ .. 139493 05/08/86 29364.95 SOUTHSIDE DIST COINC INVENTORY 50 -4630- 822 -82 139493 - 05/08/86 ___._ - - 39491.15 _ _ SOUTHSIDE DIST COINC' _ INVENTORY­- _ T _ 50 -4630- 842 -84 59856.10 rrrrrr _ - -- - - - - *r* -CKS 139495 05/0918E 140.00 SOUTHTOWN REEFRIG EQUIP MAINT 27- 4274 - 661 -66 - - - -- - - -- 140.00 -t - -- - - - - -- *r *r *r * ** -CKS " 139498 05/14/8E 11.04 STARK ELECTTRONICS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 11.04 99999* * ** -CKS ` 139503 05/14/86 224.03 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 910771 139503 05/09/8E 65.43 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 646 -64 915684 139503 05/12/86 77.17 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP GEN SUPPLIES 40 -4504- 801 -80 912496 139503 05/12/86 -.-----SUBURBAN 136.35 PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540- 805 -80 909428 v 502.98 * ** -CKS v 139505 05/09/86 19.63 SUN ADVERTISING 10 -4210- 140 -14 139505 05/12/86 _ _ _ - 28.59 SUN ADVERTISING 10 -4210- 140 -14 48.22 + * ** -CKS v , 139508 05/09/86 26.29 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 260 -26 139508 05/12/86 _ 40.50 _ _ ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 470 -47 1625 %WI 139508 05/09/86 20.73 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 510 -51 . 139508 05/13/86 12.54 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 540 -54 139508 05/09/86 32.49 Sr PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 30 -4504- 600 -60 1398 r 139508 05/09/8E 13.79 ST PAUL EOOK GEN SUPP 10 -4504- 600 -60 139508 16.65 ST PAUL BOOK SUPPLIES 27 -4516- 661 -66 _05/09/8E____ -OFFICE v • rrrrrr *** -CKS r, 139511 05/09/86 29.95 SOUTHERN VACUUM SERV SERVICES °0- 4236 - 821 -82 2483 • 29.95 • 139512 05/09/86 111.49 S T ROBS GEN SUPPLIES 40 -4504- 801 -80 40656 ' 111.49 i rrrrrr * ** -CKS - 139516 - 05/12/81 -- - - 105.49 SEARS ROEBUCK TOOLS 10 -4580- 301 -30 078270 y _ j 139516 05/09/8E 66.95 SEARS ROEBUCK GEN SUPP 28 -4504- 708-70 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -19 -86 PAGE 15 1 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDCR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. V MESSAGE 172.44 • ` rr►rr• _. - * *r -CKS 139526 05/09/8E 1,207.54 TRACY OIL GASOLINE 10- 4612- 560 -56 i 1,207.54 • i*rfrff *** -CKS 139530 05/09/8E 285.00 TEXGAS CCRP GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504: 301 -30 139530 05/09/96 237.50 TEXGAS CORP CONSTRUCTION 27 -1:00- 000 -00 14669 139530 05/09/86 285.00 TEXGAS CCRP CONSTRUCTION 21- 1300-000 -00 32611 ! 139530 05/09/8E 345.00 TEXGAS CORP CONSTRUCTION 27 -1!00- 000-00 34925 139530 05/09/86 10.00 TEXGAS CORP CONSTRUCTION 27 -1.00- 000 -00 19467 ! 139530 05/12/86 50.00 _.. -._._ TEXGAS CORP CONT REPAIRS 28- 4248-707 -70 19734 1,212.50 *rfrr• *** -CKS I 139541 05/1318E 24.99 TARGET GEN SUPP 10- 4504- 440 -44 139541 05/14/86 44.97 TARGET PHOTO SUPPLIES 27- 4508- 660 -66 69.96 ! 139542 05108/86 9,878.15 THORPE GIST INVENTORY 50 -4630- 862 -86 9,878.15 * *t *rf ** *-CKS 139545 05/09/85 88.00 TWIN CTY GARAGE DOOR REPAIR PARATS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 5515 i88.00.• j *frrr* *** -CKS I :`. 139553 05/14/8E 94.34 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 322 -30 139553 05/14/8E 13.52 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10 -454C- 330 -30 139553 04/14/86 53.26 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 139553 05/14/86 79.57 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP CONST 27 -1260- 000 -00 139553 05/14/86 78.12 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP_ CONST 21 -1300- 000 -00 318.81 *rffr: ** *-CKS 139569 05/09/86 199.04 VALLEY IND PROPANE GASOLINE 28 -4612- 707 -70 199.04 - r►rrfr * ** -CK3 ' 1395/3 05/14/8E 225.00 VOSS GEN SUPP 10 -4504- 322 -3U 27446 139573 05/14/86 66.75 VOSS GEN SUPP. 50- 4504 - 841 -84 27447 291.75 • i •*frr• i * ** -CKS 139575 05/13/86 112.50 WATER PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540- 670 -66 008825 139575 05/13/8E 19113.67 WATER PRCDUCTS REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 670 -66 J58564 . .� I I 1I °r If lil l {l9 �lA 111 MIT �tl IJ Jii ! :c i 1986 C OF EDINA CHECK T. .TER 05 -19 -86 GE 17 ~ CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 2 P.O. 0 MESSAGE 139575 05/13/86 .01 WATER PRCDUCTS REPAIR PARTS 27 -4540- 670 -66 , 139515 05/13/81 113.68- WATER PRCDUCTS CORRECTION 27- 4540 - 670 -66 139575 05/13/86 113.68 - WATER PRCDUCTS REPAIR PARTS - - 27- 4540 - 670 -66 J58564 ,. I 19226.18 * , - -- -- -- -- - -- -•----- -- -�.-.- - --- -• --- -- -....__ - -__._.- ___-- - -- -- -- - ---- .�____ -- --- - -_�.. rr# -CKS , .. 1395x9 05/13/86 212.54 WILLIAMS STEEL -HOWE GEN SUPP 10- 4504 - 646 -64 93010 , 212.54 + ++ -CKS 139582 05/09/86 "' '327.44 CORDON SMITH CO GASOLINE 27 -4612- 662 -66 0693 327.44 ffffff rr# -CKS � 139586 05/14/8E 10.67 - Y W GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS �- 40- 4540 - 801 -80 10.67 * 139587 05/14/86 170.20 WEIGLE SUE MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 600 -60 170.20 * * ** -CKS 139590 05/14/8E 100.00 HENRY WROBLESKI POLICE SERV 10 -4100- 420 -42 100.00 • r , ffkfff . #r #-CKS tw 139593 05/09/86 352.68 MINNESOTA CLAY INVENTORY 23- 1209 - 000 -00 04512 352.68 � #t # # ## *+ *-CKS � 139612 05/09/8E '174.47 - - MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP BLACKTOP 10 -4524- 301 -30 174.47 + • 139613 05/12/86 315.30 MCNEILUS STEEL GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 794 ,r 139613 05/09/86 616.42 MCNEILUS STEEL PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 139613 05/12/86 _ 197.06 MCNEILUS STEEL PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 180 139613 05/12/8E 119.90______ MCNEILUS STEEL CONSTRUCTION 27 -1300- 000 -00 346 v 139613 05/09/86 72.73 MCNEILUS STEEL CONSTRUCTION 27 -1!00- 000 -00 . 1021.41 y ttttft * * *-CKS � 139703 05/08/86 145.06 LABOR RELATIONS CONT SERV 10 -42CO- 440 -44 145.06 139704 05/08/86 25.00 ON LINE COMPUTERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 600 -60 %w 139704 05/08/86 29750.00 ON LINE COMPUTERS CAPITAL OUTLAY 10 -4900- 600 -60 29775.00 + r 139705 05/08/8E 168.37 TRI SUPPLY COMPANY INVENTORY 50- 4632- 862 -86 tir � 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -19 -86 PAGE 18 t CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION -_ _. _ - ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. 4 MESSAGE - - -,.. _ _. f l 168.37 r 139706 05/09/86 156.00 PARENT OF H STOLTZ AMBULANCE REFUND 10- 3180- 000 -00 156.00 • 139707 05/09/8E -� _ 13.60 HENN CTY DEPT OF - POSTAGE -'10- 4290-140 -14 13.60 • 139108 05/09/86 84.25 _ ROBERT GERBER AMBULANCE REFUND 10 -3180- 000 -00 84.25 • 139709 05/09/8E 224.00 - DAY DIST INVENTORY - 50- 4630- 862 -86 224.00 • 139710 05/09/86 110.18 A PLUS PRESORT POSTAGE 10 -4290- 510 -51 110.18 ••• -CKS 139712 05/09/8E _ 28.00 -._ .. COMMISSICNER OF DUES -- -• -- -_ ____ .�.._..� 10 -4204- 200 -20 28.00 • _ 139713 - - 05/09/86 -- _ - 200.92 NATL GUARDIAN ALARM SERVICE 50- 4304 - 841 -84 200.92 + _. 139714 05/08/86 240.00 DAVID AMDUR INST 23- 4100 - 614 -61 240.00 - 139715 05/08/86 _ 312.00 -� PHYL HAYVA INST 23 -4100- 614 -61 312.00 .. 139716 _ 05/08/8E _300.00 PATTER HELLSTROM INST 23 -4100- 614 -61 139716 05/08/86 30.00- PATTER HELLSTROM CORRECTION 23- 4100- 614 -61 139716 05/08/8E 30.00 PATTER HELLSTROM INST 23- 4100-614 -61 300.00 v 139117 05/08/8£ 106.00 KATHY GUSTAFSON INST 23 -41CO- 614 -61 ` 106.00 • 139718 05/08/86 108.00 JUDY LEBER INST 23 -4100- 614 -61 108.00 + 139719 05/08/86 19037.00 SUAN FRAME INST 23- 4100- 614 -61 19037.00 • - 139720 05/08/86 624.00 JEAN GRAPP INST 23 -4100- 614 -61 624.00 • __ V , _ _ __ 139121 05/08/86 72.00 MARION ALSTAD INST 23 -4100- 614 -61 = 05/08186 _ _ _ 72.00- MARION ALSTAD CORRECTION 23 -4100- 614 -61 f i139721 139721 05/08/86 720.00 MARION ALSTAD INST 23 -4100- 614 -61 720.00 + 139722 05/08/86 135.00 BETTY ANCERSON ______INST 23 -41CO- 614 -61 r 135.00 + < 1986 C. JF EDINA CHECK F ,TER 05 -19 -86 GE 19 'CHECKONO. DATE _ - - - - -- AMOUNT -- -- - VENDOR - -- --.. _ _ -_ -- - ITEM DESCRIPTION - - - - - - --- ACCOUNT N0. INV. Y P.O. >f MESSAGE __ •- - - 139723 05/08/8E 92.50 ... _ . MARGARET GUST INST 23 -4100- 614 -61 92.50 * - - - - -- - - - -- y 139124 05/08/86 72.00 MARGARET LEE INST 23 -41CO- 614 -61 72.00 : _ - -- - -- ---- v 139725 05/08/86 80.00 EVIE HOLMQUIST INST 23 -4100- 614 -61 ` 80.00 • - -- 139726 05/08/86 19148.55 -� KAY SCHLOSSER - - -- INST 23- 4100 - 614 -61 19148.55 139727 05/08/86 276.00 MAUREEN EROCKMAY INST 23 -4100- 614 -61 •. 276.00 + v 139728 05/08/86 608.00 PAM BONZELET INST 23- 4000-614 -61 139728 05/08/86 ___ 608.00- . PAM BONZELET CORRECTION 23 -4000- 614 -61 " 139728 05/08/86 69000.00- PAM BONZELET CORRECTION 23 -4100- 614 -61 139728 05/08/86 608.00 PAM BONZELET 4iPAM INST 23 -41CO- 614 -61 139728 05/08/86 69108.00 BONZELET INST 23 -4100- 614 -61 139728 05/08/86 108.00- PAM BONZELET CORRECTION 23 -4100- 614 -61 608.00 + 139729 05/08/86 60.00 BETTY PEDDIE INST 23 -41CO- 614 -61 60.00 • L, 139730 05/08/86 276.00 BILL DIETRICHSON INST 23 -4100- 614 -61 276.00 • i, 139731 05/09/86 36.55 PENNER INTERNATIONAL GEN SUPP 28 -4504- 708 -70 36.55 * L, 139732 05/09/86 13.25 SALAAM CATERING MEETING EXPENSES 10 -4206- 100 -10 13.25 * 139133 05/09/86 107.60 GUNNERY INC AMMUNITION 10- 4572- 420 -42 107.60 * 139734 05/09/86 175.00 ACME YINCOY CLEANING GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 390 -30 206 175.00 * y 139735 05/09/86 840.00 TESSMANSEED 8 CHEM SEED 10- 4568-353 -30 113139 139735 05/09/86 840.00 _ TESSMANSEED 8 CHEM SEED 10- 4568 - 642 -64 113139 19680.00 139736 05/09/86 __19990.54 MOTOROLA INC RADIO EQUIPMENT 10 -4914- 420 -42 19990.54 + 139737 05/09/86 784.50- DON ENGER CORRECTION 10 -4266- 420 -42 139737 05/09/8E 74.50 DON ENGER CLOTHING REIM 10 -4266- 420 -42 139731 05/09/86 784.50 DON ENGER CLOTHING REIM 10- 4266 - 420 -42 .. - -- - - -- 74.50 • 139738 05/09/86 110.00 MGMT EDUCATION SERV TRAINING 10- 4202- 420 -42 v s 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -19 -86 PAGE 20 CHECK NO. DATE _ AMOUNT VENDCR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. -INV. A P.O. # MESSAGE 110.00 • 139739 05/09/86 536.00 - FRIDEN ALCATEL OFFICE EQUIPMENT 10 -4906- 502 -50 139739 05/09/8E 536.00 FRIOEN ALCATEL OFFICE EQUIPMENT 10 -4906- 600 -60 19072.00 + 139740 05/09/86 19564.00 LANDSCAPE B TWF CHEMICALS 27 -4564- 662 -66 2162 19564.00 • 139741 05/09/8E 290.00 ALPHA VIDEO B AUDIO CABLE TV 10 -2149= 000 -00 290.00 • - ••rr +• + * + -CKS 139744 05/09/8E 54.80 BERG BAG COMPANY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 460 -46 8740 54.80 • 139745 ^05/09/86_ 30.05 - G A THOMPSON CO PRINTING 10 -4600- 420 -42 15868 30.05 139746 05/09/86 15.00 F 8 F SALES GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 160 -16 009096 15.00 • 139747 05/09/86 - 357.13 ~ ACTION MAILING SERV PRINTING - - 10- 4600 - 600 -60 357.13 • 139748 05/09/86 35.00 WHEELER TANK MANUF REPAIR PARTS 27 -4540- 670 -66 27058 �. 35.00 • 139749 05/09/86 55.00 APWA DUES 10 -4204- 260-26 15415 55.00 • 139750 05/12/86 158.90 _ BARRY SEWALL TOOLS 30- 4580- 301 -30 083857 158.90 • 139751 - 05/12/8E _ 16.78 FLAHERTY EQUIP CORP REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 v 139751 05/09/8E 19339.00 FLAHERTY EQUIP CORP REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 810 -80 I 1x355.78 + 139752 05/12/86 104.04 GAS SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 301 -30 040919 104.04 • 139753 05/12/86 39.00 RACO OIL g GREASE CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 9504 - 400 -40 29635 39.00 + '= 139754 05/12/86 77.64 NORTHERN AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 32589 - -- - 77.64 139755 05/09/86 339.90 INLAND TRUCK PARTS REPAIR PARTAS 10 -4540- 560 -56 86730 139755 _ 05/09/8E 25.01,. ----INLAND -TRUCK PARTS REPAIR PARTS _ __. 10 -4540- 560 -56 86777 364.91 • 139756 -_._ 05/09/86 _ _ _ 54.71 N POWER PRODUCTS - - - - - - -- REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 - 56_•215021 54.71 • - __-__- _- ______ r -. 'I 139757_ 05/09/86 _ 5.00 K 8 K SALES GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 301 -30 89265 s 7986 Cl- )F EDINA CHECK R TER 05 -19-86 ;E 21 y CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. # MESSAGE 139757 05/13/8E 421.00 K 8 K SALES REPAIR PARATS 27- 4540- 661 -66 89382 426.00 • 139758 05/09/8E 39.91 ED MCDEVITT REPAIR PARTAS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 63965 39.91 * - 139759 05/09/86 400.00 KVETENSKY NURSERY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 390 -30 1266 400.00 139760 05/09/86 101.56 COPY DUPLICATING GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 540 -54 139760 05/09/86 162.00 COPY DUPLICATING GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 540 -54 263.56 -, - - -- - V 139761 05109/86 162.00 TOLE PAK CONSTRUCTION 27- 1300 - 000 -00 162.00 • _ _ 139762 05/09/8E 454.76 NS CONCRETE COMP CONSTRUCTION 27 -1300- 000 -00 34363 139762 05/14/86 309.15 _ - __ NS CONCRETE COMP CONST 27 -13CC- 000 -00 34467 v 763.91 * 139763 05/09/86 16.00 J 8 F REDDY RENTS CONSTRUCTION 27- 1200- 000 -00 8439 �,. 16.00 * 139764 05/09/8E - 130.35 ' ASHLAND CHEMCO - PAINT _ - - 10- 4544 - 335 -30 139764 05/09/86 20.00- ASHLAND CHEMCO CREDIT 10 -4544- 335 -30 110.35 + 139765 05/09/86 520.17- ZAHL EQUIP COMP CORRECTIN 10 -4540- 540 -54 121013 139765 05/09/8E 520.17__ ZAHL EQUIP COMP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 121013 139765 05/09/86 _ - 520.17 -------ZAHL _ EQUIP COMP - REPAIR PARTS - -- 10 -4540- 540 -54 121013 520.17 * 139766 05/12/86 779.25 _ ADVENTUR VAN DATER GEN SUPPLIES 40 -4504- 801 -80 14219 v 779.25 * 139767 05/12/86 728.64 INTERL HCUGH DIV IND REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 17949 728.64 •. 139768 05/12/86 19025.45 - DIAMOND VOGEL PAINT GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 335 -30 139768 05/12/86 32.10 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINT PAINT 10 -4544- 335 -30 55446 139768 05/12/86 29001.00 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINT PAINT 10 -4544- 335 -30 95445 139768 05/12/8E _ 3ip210.00' ~ DIAMOND VOGEL PAINT PAINT 10 -4544- 335 -30 95446 v 139768 05/12/86 32.10- DIAMOND VOGEL PAINT CORRECTION 10 -4544- 335 -30 69236.45 139769 05/12/8( 112.50 MAGNUSON SOD SOD 10 -4_62- 308 -30 139769 05/12/8E 112.50- MAGNUSON SOD CORRECTION 10 -4562- 308 -30 139769 05/12/86 _ 112.50 MAGNUSON SOD SOD 10 -4562- 318 -30 u' 139769 05/12/86 112.50 MAGNUSON SOD CHEMICALS 40 -4564- 803 -80 225.00 • 139770 05/12/86 816.00 EDINA POLICE CONFERENCE 10- 4202 - 460 -46 816.00 • �I 139771 05/12/86 446.98 KENNY BOILER 8 MFG CONT REPAIRS 28 -4248- 708 -70 71734 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -19 -86 PAGE 22 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENOCR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. t MESSAGE 446.98 • 139712 05/12/86 58.50 MRS NORMAN WENDT REFUND 40 -3525- 000 -00 58.50 • 139713 05/12/86 150.01 CITY OF RICHFIELD POWER 10 -4252- 345 -30 150.01 • 139714 05/12/81 129226.50 METRO WASTE CONTROL BLDG PERMITS 10- 3095- 000 -00 129226.50 • i 139775 05/12/8E 39407.31 STRGAR RCSCOE FAUSCH CONSTRUCTION EO -1!00- 264 -04 39407.31 • 1397/6 05/1 218t 250.00 808 SOBCYIAK SERVICES 23 -4200- 610 -61 250.00 • 139717 05/12/8E 18.00 FLORENCE ANDERSON CLASS REFUND 23- 3`00- 000 -00 18.00.• e. 139718 05/12/86 196.98 NORTHSTAR ICE INVENTORY °0 -4632- 822 -82 139718 05/12/86 275.38 NORTHSTAR ICE INVENTORY 50 -4632- 842 -84 139778 05/12/8E 182.77 NORTH STAR ICE INVENTORY 50 -46!2- 862 -86 655.13 • 139779 05/12/86 25.00 AUTO SOUND ENTRONIX EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 420 -42 0901 139719 05/12/86 49.00 AUTO SOUND ENTRONIX EQUIP MAINT 10- 4214- 420 -42 0908 139779 05/12/86 17.50 AUTO SOUND ENTRONIX EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274- 420 -42 0919 139719 05/12/86 49.00 AUTO SOUND ENTRONIX EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274- 420 -42 0915 140.50 • 139780 05/12/86 60.22 AT 8 T TELEPHONE, 10- 42`_6- 510 -51 139790 05/12/86 5.09 AT 8 T TELEPHONE 23 -4256- 611 -61 139780 05/13/86 1.23 AT B T TELEPHONE 27- 4256 - 661 -66 139780 05/12186 1.83 AT 6 T TELEPHONE 50- 4256-821 -82 68.37 139781 05/12/8E 29074.33 -. CLEAN FLO LAB INDIANHEAD LAKE 10- 2242 - 000 -00 29074.33 139782 05/12/8E 60.75 ...... WAHL 8 WAHL INC EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274- 420 -42 60.75 * 139783 05/12/86 523.00 VIKING PRESS CONT SERV 10- 4200- 500 -50 005399 523.00 • .•.•.. •• * -CKS _ 139786 05/13/86 46.20 WEST WELL GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 560 -56 60353 139786 05/13/86 33.69 WEST WELC GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 560 -56 60419 139185 05/13/8E 33.69- WEST WELC CORRETION 10- 4504 - 560 -56 60419 139786 05/13/86 33.69 WEST WELC GEN SUPP 10 -4504- 560 -56 60419 < 139786 05/13/86 130.00 _ PEST WELD WELDING SUPPLIES 10 -4610- 560 -56 209.89 f 139787 05/13/86 298.08 TEMP HEAT CONST 27 -1200- 000-00 3793 1986 C. JF EDINA CHECK R .TER 05 -19 -86 GE 23 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE j 298.08 139188 05/13/86 84.00 - SAFEWAY STEEL PROD CONST­ - 27 -1300- 000 -00 R13904 84.00 + 139789 05/13/86 - - - -- 145.00_ -_�. MECO - CONST -' _�__ ____�_,- 27 -1300- 000 -00 700566 �I 145.00 * 139790 05/13/86 - 276.48 MACAURTHER COMP CONST - 27- 1300- 000 -00 62677 276.48 * 139791 05/12/86 17.10 GUY SPEAKER COMP REPAIR PARTS- 40- 4540 - 801-80 23823 139792 05/13/8E 54.24 MPLS TRUCK CENTER REPAIR PARATS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 14652 54.24 139793 05/13/86 19005.84 y CRAWFORD DOOR SALES CONST �- 27 -1300- 000 -00 116093 19005.84 139794 05/13/86 920.00 STEPHENSON MER CONST CONST _ 27 -1300- 000 -00 920.00 139795 05/13/86 82.00 BRAEMAR QUICK PRINT RES SKAT _ 10 -2235- 000 -00 21580 82.00 * 139796 05/13/8E 20.00 EARL MEICHSNER CONF 10- 4202 - 482 -48 20.00 * 139797 05/13/86 -20.00 -- DAVE VELCE - - CONF - - 10- 4202 - 480 -48 20.00 * 139798 05113/86 35.15 COLLEEN PAULUS CONF 10- 4202 - 480 -48 35.75 * 139799 05/13/86 58.00 EMPLOYEE ACTIVITY - REFUND 30 -32:0- 000 -00 58.00 • 139800 05/13/86 LL 7.00 SUPERINTENDENT OF BOOK 30 -4502- 440 -44 " 7.00 139801 05/13/86 350.00 - EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS MOVIE PROD 10- 4608 - 440 -44 350.00 139802 05/13/8E 22.00 S THUNDER SOUND FIGURE SKAT 10- 2235- 000 -00 .r 139802 05/13/86 29200.00 S THUNDER SOUND FIG SKATIh6 10 -22:5- 000 -00 139802 05/13/8E - 22.00- S THUNDER SOUND - -- .. CORRECTION 10 -22:5- 000 -00 29200.00 _. * 139803 05/13/8E 25.00 HENN CTY TREASURER RUBBISH REMOVAL 10- 4250 - 353 -30 12161 25.00 + 139804 05/13/86 100.00 MAIN HURCMAN CPAS AUDIT 23- 4216 - 610 -61 I I 139804 05/13!86 100.00- MAIN HURCMAN CPAS _ _ _ AUDIT _ _ 26 -4216- 688 -68 139804 05/13/86 700.00 MAIN HURCMAN CPAS AUDIT 21 -4216- 660 -66 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -19 -86 PAGE 24 OU I CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT - VENDOR ITEM _DE_S__CRIPTION - ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. 2 MESSAGE 139804 05/13/86 500.00 MAIN HURCMAN CPAS AUDIT 28- 4216 - 706 -70 139804 05/13/8f _ _ 100.00 __.. MAIN HURCMAN CPAS AUDIT I 19500.00 139805 05/13/86 48.00 LMC HOUSING CONFERENCE 10 -4202- 140 -14 48.00 • - -- - - - - -- 139806 05/13/8E _. 120.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES CONFERENCE 10 -4202- 140 -14 120.00 * 139807 05/13/8E 23.27 - -- AMERICAN BAKERIES CO CONCESSIONS 28 -4624- 704 -70 23.27 • - 139808 05/13/86 39.80 VENDORS SUPPLY EQUIP MAINT 27 -4274- 661 -66 11550 39.80 * 139309 05/14/86 4779.00 JOE GREUPHER LESSONS 27 -4100- 675 -66 139809 05/13/86 10,922.0d-. JOE GREUFHER LESSONS 27-4100-675-66 L; 159701.00 139810 05/13/86 73.32 CHEMSEARCH CLEAN SUPP 10- 4512 - 440 -44 73.32 l 139811'---' '05/13/86 i 42.00 _ DON WENDLING -RADIO SERV- 10- 4294- 440 -44 1029 �;• 42.00 * t 139812 05/13/8E 29.45 DONS APPLIANCE CONT REPAIRS 10- 4246-446-44 1327 29.45 * t 139813 05/13/86 35.66 ARMSTRONG INDUSTRIES 1ST AID SUPPLIES 10- 4510 - 440 -44 Ci 35.66 t 139814 05 /14 /8E - 156.00 _ TV FANFARE PUBLIC - ADVERTISING !0 -4214- 820 -82 t� 139814 05/14/86 156.00 TV FANFARE PUBLIC ADVERTISING °0 -4114- 840 -89 t 139814 -- 05/14/86 - _ -! 156 .0 0 - - TV FANFARE PUBLIC ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 860 -86 468.00 A - - _ l 139815 05/14/86 _244.67- .XEROX CORP - SERVICE CONTRACT_ - _ 10 -42ES- 510 -51 244.67 139816 05/14/86 - _ 89.25_ EDWARD LANCELLO MILEAGE 10 -4208- 390 -30 139816 05/14/86 40.00 _ EDWARD LANCELLO ROTO RENTAL 10- 4504 - 390 -30 'ec 129.25 * fl 139817 05/14/86 90.00 NORCOSTCO INC FIG SKATING 10 -2235- 000 -00 90.00 * fl 139818 _05/14/8E 109530.00 HOLLENBACK B NELSON CONST 27- 1300 - 000 -00 4352 109530.00 * ! 139819 05/14/8E 19100.00 STEPHENSON CONST SERVICES 27- 4248 - 661 -66 'I 19100.00 * ! 139820 05/14/86 19345.00 SPANCRETE MIDWEST CONST 27 -1300- 000 -00 007726 19345.00 * A 4' 4 1986 C OF EDINA CHECK F 'TER 05 -19 -86 GE 25 CHECK nu. DATE AMOUNT VENDCR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 9 P.O. V MESSAGE 139821 05/14/86 159338.92 -- VICTOR CARLSON PAYMENT 60 -2040- 000 -00 i 159338.92 + 139822 05/14/86 379978.43 - J P NOREM INC PAYMENT 60 -2040- 000 -00 - 379978.43 +� 139823 05/14/86 229926.35 0 L R CONSTRUCTION PAYMENT 60 -2040- 000 -00 229926.35 & - - r 139824 05/14/86 122x561.81 -- - ANNANDALE SEWER PAYMENT 60 -20407000 -00 ' 122,561.81 • - 139825 05/14/86 "' '26908.02 C S MCCROSSAN PAYMENT. 60 -2040- 000 -00 269908.02 + v 139826 05/14/86 - 2x032.49 -- -t_ MIDWEST ASPHALT PAYMENT 60- 2040 - 000 -00 29032.49 - 139827 05/14/86 2,019.00 ED KRAEMER 8 SONS CONST 27 -1300- 000 -00 29019.00 * - y 139828 05/14/86 451.01 MERIAM INSTRUMENT REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 801 -80 49082 451.01 + _. •t :rrr - _ rrr-CKS 139830 05/14/86 .346.70 MAC DONALD PBLG CO CONT REPAIRS 40 -4248- 803 -80 346.70 + 139831 05/14/86 34.35 LOUIS ABRAHAM MILEAGE 40- 4208 - 806 -80 34.35 139832 05/14/86 19581.42 SCHERER EROS LUMBER PRINTING 27- 4600 - 661 -66 19581.42 + 139833 05/14/86 39174.90• CRAWFORD HERZ CONST CONST 27 -1300- 000 -00 39174.90 + 139834 05/14/86 39514.40 DALE TILE CONST 27- 1300 - 000 -00 3,514.40 + " 139835 05/14/86 19045.05 GARDNER HARDWARE CONST 27 -1300- 000 -00 19045.05 139836 05/14/86 272.50 VANGUARD TRAVEL CONVENTION 10- 4202- 600 -60 272.50 + 139837 05/14/86 25.00 ELM RESEARCH MEMBERSHIP 10- 4204 - 600 -60 25.00 139838 05/14/86 200.00 ISIA ISIA CONF 28- 4202 - 708 -70 200.00 + T 139839 05/14/86 247.00 ERIC ANDERSON SERVICES 10- 4200 - 500 -50 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -19 -86 PAGE 25 t: 1 CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT_ VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ` --_ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE 139839 05/14/8E 31.50 ERIC ANDERSON MILEAGE 10 -4208- 500 -50 'I 278.50 * 139840 05/14/86 652.11 WACO INTERNATIONAL SERV 27 -4288- 661 -66 652.11 + 139841 05/14/86 19522.50 NERMFLEK INC SERVICES 10 -4260- 160 -16 - 19522.50 t, 139842 05/14/86 509248.00 NORWEST EANK MPLS DUE FROM HRA 10 -1145- 000 -00 509248.00 * 139843 05/14/86 308.80 STEVE SIPPER SICK PAY REIM 10 -4122- 001 -44 308.80 LW 139844 05/14/86 26.95 JARDIN FLEVRI ART WORK SOLO 23- 3625- 000 -00 26.95 139845 05/14/8E 147.70 SUSAN FRAME ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 147.70 * 139846 05/14/86 68.95 PAT GREER ART WORK SCLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 68.95 * L 139847 05/14/86 3.85 MARJORIE MADSEN ART WORK SOLO 23- 3625- 000 -00 3.85 * 139848 05/14/86 7.52 NANCY HAPMER ART WORK SCLD 23 -3625- 000 -00 7.52 * E• 139849 05/14/86 7.00 PHYLLIS HAYWA ART YORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 7.00 (61 139850 05/14/8E 7.00 MARGARET MCDOWELL ART WORK SCLC 23 -3625- 000 -00 7.00 + 1L 139851 05/14/86 4.20 BETTY OLSON ART WORK SOLO 23- 3625- 000 -00 4.20 t, 139852 05/14/86 72.10 BETTY PECOIE ART WORK SCLC 23 -3625- 000 -00 72.10 139853 05114/86 4.55- MARION WARD CORRECTION 23 -3E25- 000 -00 L 139853 05/14/86 _ _4.55 MARION WARD ART WORK SCLC 23- 3625- 000-00 139853 05/14/8E 4.55 MARION LARD ART WORK SCLC 23 -3E25- 000 -00 16 4.55 + 139854 05/14/86 7.00 ART WHITE ART WORK SOLO 23 -3625- 000 -00 E, 7.00 139855 05/14/8( 14.00 LOIS WILLS ART WORK SCLC 23 -3625- 000 -00 14.00 139856 05/14/86 -46.28 MOLLIE PAULSON CONT SERV 23 -4200- 610 -61 46.28 V 1 . / 1986 C' It 1F EDINA CHECK R TER 05 -19 -86 iE 27 CH,EC" Nu. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. A P.O. 9 MESSAGE 139851 05/14/86 - 18.80 -_ RDA CONSTRUCTION CORRECTI.ON 27 -4248- 661 -66 • 139857 05/14/86 18.80 - ROA.CONSTRUCTION LABOR -- 27 -4248- 661 -66 139857 05/14/86 19880.00 RDA CONSTRUCTION LABOR 27- 42248- 661 -66 139857 05/14/8E 64.00 RDA CONSTRUCTION NAILS 27 -4604- 661 -66 _ 19944.00 + 139858 05/14/86 19650.00 R A MERZ CONST LABOR 27 -4248- 661 -66 19650.00 f - 139859 05/14/86 235.00 - BARE FOOT GRASS LAWN CONT SERV 10 -4200- 642 -64 235.00 • - - 139860 05/14/86 184.24 PHYUSIO CONTROL 1ST AID SUPPLIES 10- 4510- 440 -44 A61736 184.24 * - 139861 05/14_/86 517.31 - COUNTY MEDICAL 1ST AID SUPPLIES 10 -4510- 440 -44 64470 517.31 -HENN - 139862 05/14/86 _ 96.42 ROOT 0 MATIC _ _ CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 446 -44 _1 96.42 • _ ffffff - - -- - - --- - -- -- - - - -- ------ ----•- -- -- -__. fff -CKS 398829 05/14/86 15.00 STATE TREASURER CERT RENEWAL 40 -4310- 809 -80 15.00 + ffffrf + +* -CKS 2299930.09 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND _ 89030.87 _ FUND 2! TOTAL ART CENTER 360.45 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND 649567.87 FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 99215.73 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 386.17 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 309611.60 FUND 4C TOTAL UTILITY FUND 819943.06 FUND 50 TOTAL - LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 2319377.04' FUND 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT, 5 669422.88 � TOTAL � CHECK F'FCISTrR DATED ,d" /�q /fG • _ - -- - PAGES ----- -- - �� -� ---._ — THROUGH. (,,TY M „td,;UER CAT - -- - - - Hand typed 69429 thru 69434 - - - -- - - - — -- - - - - - - _. - Computer checks Vs 70277 70572 CHECK RLv1STER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 27.50 CAPITAL CITY INVENTORY 153.25 CAPITAL CITY INVENTORY 55.00 CAPITAL CITY INVENTORY 235.75 2.62- EAGLE WINE 131.20 EAGLE WINE 128.58 + 170.52 ED PHILLIPS 170.52 * 300.00 POSTMASTER 300.00 DISCOUNT EMPLOYER PORTION INVENTORY POSTAGE DUE 29785.26 MUTUAL BENEFIT EMPLOYER PORTION 29785.26 * 15.22 NORTHERN STATES 413.64 1986 CITY OF EDINA 61.92 NORTHERN STATES 19126.89 - CHECK N$: DATE i 070067 04/30/86 109182.88 070067 04/30/86 128.67 070067 04/30/86 129282.70 NORTHWESTERN BELL i 1, #*rrfr BELL 24.40 070135 04/30186 318.04 ,070135 04/30/86 346.35 NORTHWESTERN BELL 32.98 NORTHWESTERN BELL 109.29 070138 04/30/86 i' frifri BELL 14.10 070768 04/30/86 PHONE 23 -4256- 611 -61 MANUAL PHONE 071368 04/30/86 • 27- 4256- 661 -66 MANUAL iktt*k! 28 -4256- 708 -70 MANUAL s 29 -4256- 721 -72 MANUAL PHONE 011391 04/30/86 PHONE 071391 04/30/86 PHONE 071391 04/30/86 011391 04/30/86 071391 04/30/86 071391 04/30/86 071391 04/30/86 *trrrr 071396 04/30/8E 071396 04/30/86 071396 04/30/8E 071396 04/30/86 071396 04/30/86 071396 04/30/86 071396 04/30/86 011396 04/30/86 071396 04/30/86 071396 04/30/86 071396 04/30/86 071396 04/30/86 071396 04/30/86 071396 04/30/86 071396 04/30/86 OT1396 04/30/86 CHECK RLv1STER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 27.50 CAPITAL CITY INVENTORY 153.25 CAPITAL CITY INVENTORY 55.00 CAPITAL CITY INVENTORY 235.75 2.62- EAGLE WINE 131.20 EAGLE WINE 128.58 + 170.52 ED PHILLIPS 170.52 * 300.00 POSTMASTER 300.00 DISCOUNT EMPLOYER PORTION INVENTORY POSTAGE DUE 29785.26 MUTUAL BENEFIT EMPLOYER PORTION 29785.26 * 15.22 NORTHERN STATES 413.64 NORTHERN STATES 61.92 NORTHERN STATES 19126.89 NORTHERN STATES 353.48 NORTHERN STATES 109182.88 NORTHERN STATES 128.67 NORTHERN STATES 129282.70 NORTHWESTERN BELL 60.25 NORTHWESTERN BELL 54.95 NORTHWESTERN BELL 39417.93 NORTHWESTERN BELL 115.09 NORTHWESTERN BELL 7.32- NORTHWESTERN BELL 7.32 NORTHWESTERN BELL 107.32 NORTHWESTERN BELL 49.90 NORTHWESTERN BELL 141.37 NORTHWESTERN BELL 24.40 NORTHWESTERN BELL 318.04 NORTHWESTERN BELL 346.35 NORTHWESTERN BELL 32.98 NORTHWESTERN BELL 109.29 NORTHWESTERN BELL 268.80 NORTHWESTERN BELL 14.10 NORTHWESTERN BELL 04 -30 -86 AGE 1 ACCOUNT NO. INV. I P.O. 0 MESSAGE 50 -4630- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4630 - 842 -64 MANUAL 50- 4630- 862 -86 MANUAL ***-CKS 50- 3710 - 003 -00 MANUAL 50- 4632,- 862 -86 MANUAL *** -CKS 50- 4632- 842 -84 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4290 - 510 -51 MANUAL ** *-CKS 10- 4158 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS ELECTRIC 10 -1130- 000 -00 MANUAL ELECTRIC 10 -4252- 330 -30 MANUAL ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 345 -30 MANUAL ELECTRIC 23- 4252 - 611 -61 MANUAL ELECTRIC 40 -4252- 801 -80 MANUAL ELECTRIC 40 -4252- 803 -80 MANUAL ELECTRIC 40- 4252 - 804 -80 MANUAL * ** -CKS PHONE 10 -4226- 160 -16 MANUAL PHONE 10- 4256- 460 -46 MANUAL PHONE 10 -4256- 510 -51 MANUAL PHONE 10 -4256- 622 -62 MANUAL CORRECTION 10 -4256- 628 -62 MANUAL PHONE 10 -4256- 628 -62 MANUAL PHONE 10- 4256 - 628 -62 MANUAL PHONE 10- 4256 - 646 -64 MANUAL PHONE 23 -4256- 611 -61 MANUAL PHONE 26- 4256- 689 -68 MANUAL PHONE 27- 4256- 661 -66 MANUAL PHONE 28 -4256- 708 -70 MANUAL PHONE 29 -4256- 721 -72 MANUAL PHONE 40 -4256- 801 -80- MANUAL PHONE 40 -4256- 803 -80 MANUAL PHONE 50- 42`_6- 841 -84 MANUAL 0 .o 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 011396 04/30/86 � ff k ktk 50- 3710-003 -00 I 071415 04/30/86 ' W ffffff 093067 05/06/86 ° 098067 05/06/86 5.28- 098067 05/06/86 098067 05/06/86 7.50- 098061 05/06/86 098057 05/06/86 11.66- 098067 05/06/86 °. 098067 05/06/86 138.87- 098067 05/06/86 098067 05/06/86 8.06- 098067 05/06/86 °i 098067 05/06/86 1.55- 098761 05/06/86 098067 05/06/86 AMOUNT 129.71 59190.48 • 79753.75 79753.75 t 75.75 75.75 75.75- 2.00 2.00 2.00- 469.00 14.00 33.50 1.00 33.50 33.50- 1.00 1.00- 595.25 s CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION NORTHWESTERN BELL PHONE MED CENTER CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI EMPLOYER PORTION 04 -30 -86 PAGE 2 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. N MESSAGEE 50 -4256- 861 -86 MANUAL 10- 4156 - 510 -51 50 -4628- 822-82 50 -4628- 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50 -4628- 822 -82 50- 4628-822 -82 50 -4628- 822 -82 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 46228- 842 -84 50- 4628-862-86 50 -4628- 862 -86 50 -4628- 862 -86 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50- 4628-862 -86 `_0 -4628- 862 -86 sae -CKS MANUAL fse -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL ese -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL tat -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL riff ++ 098135 04/23/86 .58- EAGLE WINE CREDIT 50- 3710-003 -00 098135 05/06/86 4.81- EAGLE WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 ° 098135 05/06/86 5.28- EAGLE WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 098135 05/06/86 7.50- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 098135 05/06/8E 11.66- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 °. 098135 05/06/8E 138.87- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 098135 05/06/8E 8.06- EAGLE WINE 50- 3110- 862 -86 098135 05/06/86 1.55- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 098135 05/06/86 263.75 EAGLE WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 098135 05/06/8E 69943.33 EAGLE WINE 50 -4626- 842 -84 098135 05/06/8E 240.73 EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 ° 098135 05/06/86 583.24 EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 098135 05106/86 374.79 EAGLE MINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 093135 05/06/8E 402.94 EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 098135 05/06/86 77.70 EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 098135 04/23/86 16.16 EAGLE WINE INVENTORY 50 -4632- 822 -82 098135 04/23/86 28.80 EAGLE WINE INVENTORY 50 -4632- 862 -86 tiffff 89753.13 s 0 098138 05/06/86 .99- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 822 -82 038138 05/06/86 4.25- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 822 -82 ° 098138 05/06/86 5.51- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 822 -82 098138 05/06/86 12.00- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 098138 05/06/86 7.34- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 O 033138 05/06/8E 15.06- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 sae -CKS MANUAL fse -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL ese -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL tat -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL 1986 WOF NA CHECK STER 04 -30 -8k AGE 3 `j CHF_CK Nor DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. a MESSAGE vlTj 098138 05/06/86 8.41- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 098138 05/06/86 4.90- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3110 - 842 -84 MANUAL ^1 098138 05/06/86 3.55- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 098138 05/06/86 5.84- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710-862-86 MANUAL 098138 05/06/86 11.72- ED PHILLIPS_ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL I'1 098138 05/06/86 2.45- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 098138 05/06/86 212..50 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 098138 05/06/96 275.70 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL "j 098138 05/06/86 49.50 ED PHILLIPS _0- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 098138 05/06/86 245.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628'-842 -84 MANUAL 098138 05/06/86 599.84 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 098138 .05/06/86 367.20, ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 098138 05/06/8E 420.70 ED PHILLIPS _0 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 098138 05/06/86 753.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 098138 05/06/86 586.00 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL "! 098138 05/06/86 177.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628-862-86 MANUAL 098138 05/06/8E 292.20 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 098138 05/06/86 122.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL i 49019.62 + rrrlrt *** -CKS 098190 05/06/86 14.20- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3110- 822 -82 MANUAL 1" 098190 05/06/86 14.20- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL o 098190 05/06186 14.20- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL ' 098190 _ 05/06/86 710.00 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 098190 05/06/86 710.00 GRIGGS COOPER AND C _0- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 098190 05/06/86 710.00 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 29087.40 ! !.!-CKS , 098378 05/06/86 259.63- MARK VII SALES INC 50- 3710- d22 -82 MANUAL •I,' i 098378 05/06/86 266.00 MARK VII SALES INC 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL �.... _ -.. 8.37 * ej 1r1f*r * ►*-CKS 098433 05/06/8E 23.70 -( PAUSTIS 8 SONS 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL • 098433 05/06/86 3.00 PAUSTIS 8 SONS 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 098433 05/06/86 130.88) PAUSTIS 8 SONS 50 -4628- 822-82 MANUAL 098433 05/06/86 3.00 PAUSTIS 8 SONS 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL • 098433 05/06/86 121.84 PAUSTIS 8 SONS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL _ 098433 05/06/86 3.00 PAUSTIS 6 SONS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 098433 95/06/86 112.749 PAUSTIS 8 SONS 50- 4628-862 -86 MANUAL i 098433 04/23/86 65.88 PAUSTIS 6 SONS INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL _....__- - ....._.._ _ 416.64 • �_.•' 1!111! * ** -CKS 098435 05/06/86 4.09- PRIOR WINE CO 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 096435 05/06/86 7.57- PRIOR WINE CO 50 -3110- 842 -84 MANUAL :1 098435 - ....... -.. 05/06/86 -.... -- -- 4.59- PRIOR WINE CO 50-3710-862 -86 MANUAL 098435 05/06/86 204.54 PRIOR WINE CO _ -. 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 098435 05/06/86 378.64 PRIOR.WIAE CO 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL e � V 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 04 -30 -86 PAGE 4 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV- N P.O. # MESSAGE '- 098435 05/06/86 229.65 PRIOR WINE CO 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 796.58 + � ffrrrt + ** -CKS 098451 05/06/86 .73 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 098451 05/06/86 1.16- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 098451 05/06/86 2.01 QUALITY WINE 50- 3110 - 842 -84 MANUAL 098451 05/06/86 6.12- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL _ 098451 05/06/86 5.60- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 098451 05/06/86 8.16- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 098451 05/06/86 6.24- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 098451 05/06/86 1.28 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 098451 05/06/86 8 -00- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 093451 05/06/86 36.64- QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 098451 05/06/86 58.21 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 098451 05/06/86 280.30 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628-842 -84 MANUAL 098451. 05/05/86 100.76- QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 842-84 MANUAL 098451 05/06/86 408.23 QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 098451 05/06186 306.00 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 0.18451 05/06/86 64.12- QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 098451 05/06/86 312.02 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626-862 -86 MANUAL -�- 098451 05/06/86 400.40 QUALITY NINE -4r -862-86 MANUAL 19532.38 - !!r!!r + +* -CKS r I 098540 05/06/8E 1.06- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 098540 05/06/8E .40- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 098540 05/06/86 2.18- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL r 098540 05/06/86 7.15- TWIN CITY WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 094540 05/06/86 2.13- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 098540 05 /06 /8E 2.99- TWIN CITY WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 9' 098540 05/06/86 2.64- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 098540 05/06/86 107.05 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 098540 05/06/86 40.20 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 098540 05/06/86 715.74 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 098540 05/06/86 217.90 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 098540 05/06/86 224.25 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL `:. 098540 05/06/86 212.73 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 098540 05 /06 /BE 265.42 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 098540 04/23/86 74.00 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50- 4632- 842 -84 MANUAL 1,838.74 if krt! + ++ -CKS 105067 05/06/86 2.00- CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 105067 05/06/86 1.00- CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 3700- 822 -82 MANUAL '? 105061 05/06/8E 4.90 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 105061 05/06/86 .00 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 105067 05/06/86 .00 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 105067 05/06/86 274.75 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 105067 04/23/86 78.75 CAPITAL CITY INVENTORY 50 -4630- 862 -86 MANUAL 355.40 + *!f -CKS !!f!f• 1986 _ DINA W WK. CHEDATE 04 -30 -8t GE 5 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 105129 - 05/06/86 357.25 105129 05/06/86 105129 05/06/86 BELLBOY 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 105135 04/23/86 105135 05/06/86 " -. -_ 105135 05/06/86 50 -4626- 862 -86 105135 05/06/86 `! 105135 05/06/86 _,- 105135 05/06/86 105135 05/06/86 5.97- 105135 05/06/86 50- 3710 - 822 -82 105135 05/06/86 "! 105135 05/06/8E MANUAL 105135 05/06/86 105135 05/06/86 13.10- 105135 05/06/86 50- 3710- 842 -84 105135 05/06/86 EAGLE WINE 105135 05/06/86 MANUAL 105135 04/23/86 . + 105135 04723/86 19437.01 EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 105138 05/06/86 EAGLE WINE 105138 05/06/86 MANUAL 105138 05/06/86 105138 05/06/86 298.28 105138 05/06/86 _. 105138 05/06/86 EAGLE WINE 105138 05/06/8E MANUAL 105138 05/06/86 105138 05/06/86 599.63 100.34 105138 05/06/86 50- 4628 - 842 -84 105138 05/06/86 EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE 105138 05/06/86 MANUAL 105138 05/U6/86 INVENTORY 105138 05/06/86 105138 05/06/86 105138 05/06/86 ED PHILLIPS 105138 05/06/86 ••• -CKS 105138 05/06/86 105138 05/06/86 4.20- 105138 05/06/86 50- 3710 - 822 -82 105138 05/06/86 ED PHILLIPS 105138 05/06/86 MANUAL 105138 05/06/86 105138 05/06/86." !!f!f• ••!-CKS • w J .s J M r .e v • as w CHECK 3TER AMOUNT 04 -30 -8t GE 5 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. q P.O. q MESSAGE 357.25 BELLBOY 19156.80 BELLBOY 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 29595.40 BELLBOY 50- 4626- 842-84 MANUAL �►s109.45 * 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL •98- EAGLE WINE DISCOUNT ••• -CKS 28.74- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 003 -00 MANUAL 5.97- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 32.01- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 17.79- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 7842 -84 MANUAL 13.10- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL. 11.99- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 259.27- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 19437.01 EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 655.10 EAGLE WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 129963.62 EAGLE WINE 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 298.28 EAGLE WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 889.52 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 19600.50 EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 599.63 100.34 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 48.90 EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE INVENTORY 50 -4628- 862 -86 50- 4632 - 822 -82 MANUAL 189223.05 • INVENTORY 50 -4632- 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL 17.84- ED PHILLIPS ••• -CKS 1.84- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710-822 -82 MANUAL 4.20- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 8 -87- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 4.69- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 11.13- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 20.44- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 12.92-, ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 5.11- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 7.29- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 24.40- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 122.73- 443.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 19022.24 ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 19220.00 ED PHILLIPS 50-4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 69136.43 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 891.95 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 210.00 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 91.90 £0 PHILLIPS _....... 50- 4628-822 -82 MANUAL 556.74 ED PHILLIPS 50- 962 "8 - 822 -82 - - -- "" MANUAL 234.50 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 842 -84 645.88 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 255.34 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628-842 -84 MANUAL 364 -28 ED- 50- 46228- 862 -86 MANUAL 119831.30 _PHILLIPS _ - -- _..._..._. 50- MANUAL _ .4628-862-86 MANUAL ••!-CKS • w J .s J M r .e v • as w 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO.- DATE AMOUNT VENDOR... 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 105435 _ - 05/06/86 _ 1.56- PRIOR WINE CO i 105435 05/06/86 3.56- PRIOR WINE CO MANUAL 105435 05/06/86 .80- PRIOR WINE CO _..105435 MANUAL 05/06/86 77.98 PRIOR WIDE CO MANUAL 105435 05/06/86 178.20 PRIOR WIRE CO ' I . 105435 05/06/86 40.00 PRIOR WINE CO 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 2 90.2 6 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 105451 05/06/86 2.36- QUALITY WINE 105451 05/06/8£ 11.07- QUALITY WINE 105451 05/06/86 24.75- QUALITY WINE j 105451 05106/86 19.62- QUALITY WINE i 105451 05/06/86 32.52- QUALITY WINE 105451 05/06/86 8.16- QUALITY WINE i 105451 05/06/86 2.70- QUALITY WINE - 105451 05/06/86 114.56- QUALITY WINE _.;.,.._ „105451 05/06/86 19237.55 QUALITY WINE 1,i 105451 05/06/86 19626.49 QUALITY WINE 105451 05/06/86 59728.12 QUALITY WINE _- _105491 -_ 05106/86 553.60 QUALITY WINE 105451 05/06/86 118.13 _ QUALITY WINE 105451 05/06/86 408.45 QUALITY WINE 105451 05/06/86 981.10 QUALITY WINE 105451 05/06/86 135.13 QUALITY WINE "I 109572.83 + 195540 _ 05/06/86. 9.80- TWIN CITY WINE 105540 05106/86 81.73- TWIN CITY WINE 105540 05/06/86 .11 TWIN CITY WINE ------- 105540 05/06186 14.47- TWIN CITY WINE 105540 05/06/86 .73= . TWIN CITY WINE 105540 05106/8£ 2.29- TWIN CITY WINE 105540 05/06/86 .60- TWIN CITY WINE IOI''I 105540 05106/86 .79- TWIN CITY WINE 105540 05/06/86 105.91- TWIN CITY WINE 105540 05/06/86 2.82- TWIN CITY WINE 105540 05/06/86 7.39- TWIN CITY WINE 105540 05/06/86 1.57- TWIN CITY WINE 195540 _ 05/06/86 23.39- __. •, TWIN CITY WINE 105540 05/06/86 2.94- TWIN CITY WINE ^i?_i i 105540 05/06/86 .48- TWIN CITY WINE a __ ___105540 ,.,OS/06/8fi _. .79 -_ TWIN CITY WINE,._ 105540 05/06/86 _ 185.58- TWIN CITY WINE ” 105540 05/06/86 .00 TWIN CITY WINE '._ 105540 05/06/86 723.50 _._... TWIN CITY WINE 105540 05106/86 59294.48 TWIN CITY WINE i 195540 05/06/86 9x279.24 TWIN CITY WINE 105540,- 05/06/86 _ ..... 19169.44 TWIN CITY WINE 105540 05106/86 72.58 TWIN CITY WINE 105540 05/06/86 59.72 TWIN CITY WINE is 1 04 -30 -86 PAGE 6 ITEM DESCRIPTION_ . _ ACCOUNT._ NO., INV._.# P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628-822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL **# -CKS 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3700 - 822 -82 50 -3700- 862 -86 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710- 822 -82 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710- 822 -82 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710- 842 -84 50 -3710- 842 -84 50- 3710- 842 -84 50- 3710- 842 -84 50 -3710- 862 -86 50- 3710 - 862 786 50 -3110- 862 -86 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50 -4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 842 -84 50- 4626 - 862 -86 50 -4626- 862 -86 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628- 822 -82 ** *-CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL e 4 v , 1986 C. OF EDINA CHECK , STER 04 -30 -81 GE 7 �I CHECK N04 DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. q P.O. # MESSAGE 105540 05/06/86 228.72 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 462228- 822 -82 MANUAL 105540 05/06/86 11.83- TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 1 105540 05/06/86 78.80 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 46228- 822 -82 MANUAL 105540 04/23/86 4.74 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 1J5540 05/06/86 281.80 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 105540 04/23/86 30.00 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50- 4628-842 -84 MANUAL 105540 05/06/86 157.49 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 105540 05/06/86 738.97 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -64 MANUAL l 105540 05/06/86 .00 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628-862 -86 MANUAL 4- 105540 04/23/86 13.43 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50-4628-862 -86 MANUAL 105540 05/06/86 78.80 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL j' 105540 05106/86 295.30 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL X105540 05/06/86 47.40 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL Ij 18,101.41 + wi .***.r ** *-CKS F 108095 04/23/86 61.83 COMM OF REV STATE SALES TAX 10 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL �. 10B095 04/23/86 82.80 COMM OF REV STATE SALES TAX 23- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 103095 04/23/86 151.98 COMM OF REV STATE SALES TAX 27 -3157- 000 -00 MANUAL i 108095 04/23/86 93.14 COMM OF REV STATE SALES TAX 28 -3257- 000 -00 MANUAL e 108095 04/23/86 21.59 COMM OF REV STATE SALES TAX 29- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 108095 04/23/86 773.72 COMM OF REV STATE SALES TAX 40 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL j 108095 04/23/86 69768.90 COMM OF REV STATE SALES TAX 50 -3357- 001 -00 MANUAL w' 108095 04/23/86 129689.08 COMM OF REV STATE SALES TAX 50 -3357- 002 -00 MANUAL 108095 04/23/86 119810.29 COMM OF REV STADTE SALES TAX 50- 3357 - 003 -00 MANUAL j 329453.33 + a "I trrr *r * ** -CKS tir! 108174 04/23/86 1359000.00 1ST BANK SO BANK TRANSFER 50- 1010- 000 -00 MANUAL 108174 04/23/86 1359000.00- 1ST SOUTHDALE BANK TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -OJ MANUAL .00 w *rrtrr * ** -CKS y 108430 04/23/86 209129.08 PERA EMP CONT PERA 10- 4145 - 510 -51 MANUAL 209129.08 ii d *rr *tr * ** -CKS 108523 04/23/86 99645.83 SOCIAL SECURITY EMP PO FICA 10- 4149 - 510 -51 MANUAL v 9,645.83 r *rrr *r ** *-CKS 9y � 112055 04/23/86 234.00 BRAEMAR PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 27- 4120 - 664 -66 MANUAL 112055 04/23/86 329.15 BRAEMAR PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 27- 4120 - 669 -66 MANUAL v, 112055 04/23/86 60.00 BRAEMAR PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 27- 4202- 660 -66 MANUAL 112055 04/23/86 11.97 BRAEMAR PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 27- 4204 - 660 -66 MANUAL j 112055 04/23/86 22.50 BRAEMAR PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 27- 4248- 660 -66 MANUAL w 112055 04/23/86 22.00 BRAEMAR PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 27- 4290 - 660 -66 MANUAL 112055 04/23/86 5.12 BRAEMAR PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 27- 4504 - 661 -66 MANUAL 112055 04/23/86 81.76 BRAEMAR PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 27 -4516- 660 -66 MANUAL « 112055 04/23/86 14.84 BRAEMAR PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 27- 4540 - 661 -66 MANUAL • i' 112067 05/01/66 32.50 CAPITAL CITY INVENTORY ! 226.18 *- . rrrfrr 112135 05/01/86 4.41- EAGLE WINE DISCOUNT "1 1986 CITY OF EDINA 05/06/86 13.53- CHECK REGISTER WINE MANUAL :�_ -.._- 112135 - 05/06/86 1.04- ! NO. DATE AMOUNT _ VENDOR„ ITEM DESCRIPTION 05/06/86 112055 04/23186 2.00 BRAEMAR PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 112135 112055 2.28- 82.24 BRAEMAR PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PHILLIPS 112135 05/06/86 865.58 EAGLE WINE PHILLIPS rrrrrr 112135 05/06/66 1.04- EAGLE WINE 112067 05/06/86 8.25- CAPITAL CITY DISTRI EAGLE _112057 05/06/86 6.00 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 8.05- 112067 05/06/86 195.93 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI i' 112067 05/01/66 32.50 CAPITAL CITY INVENTORY ! 226.18 *- . rrrfrr 112135 05/01/86 4.41- EAGLE WINE DISCOUNT "1 ;7p j � 112135 05/06/86 13.53- EAGLE WINE MANUAL :�_ -.._- 112135 - 05/06/86 1.04- EAGLE WINE 05106/86 2.09- 112135 05/06/86 6.65- EAGLE WINE 3.04- ED 112135 05/06/86 2.28- EAGLE WIRE ED PHILLIPS 112135 05/06/86 34.97- EAGLE WINE PHILLIPS 112135 05/06/66 1.04- EAGLE WINE =r' 112138 _ _. 112135 05/06/86 1.04- EAGLE WINE 112138 05/06/86 112135 05/06/8E 8.05- EAGLE WINE 05/06/86 2.13- 112135 - 05/06/86 - 32.68- _ EAGLE _ WINE 11.39- ED 112135 05/06/86 676.58 EAGLE WINE ED PHILLIPS 112135 05/06/86 113.92 EAGLE WIRE PHILLIPS j 1112135 112135 05/06/86 19748.32 EAGLE WINE . _. j 39970.06 ED 05/06/86 19634.21 EAGLE WINE 19772.01 ;_J -_ 112135 05/06/86 51.90 EAGLE WINE ED PHILLIPS 112135 05/06/86 332.50 _., EAGLE WINE L: 112135 05/06/86 51.90; EAGLE WINE 112135 05/06/86 51.90 .. _ EAGLE WINE _ 112135 05/06/86 402.30 EAGLE WINE 112135 05/01/86 220.49 EAGLE WINE INVENTORY -- ._..__....._..... .. .. 59178.33 I 'I�''I *fffrr 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4630 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL _- 50 -3710- 842 -84 112138 05106/86 2.09- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 112138 05/06/86 3.04- ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 822 -82 112138 - 05/06/86 11 -19- .. ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628-822 -82 112138 05/06/86 1.03- ED PHILLIPS 112138 05/06/86 4.79- ED PHILLIPS 112138 _ _. 05/06/86 79.40- ED PHILLIPS 112138 05/06/86 13.83- ED ., PHILLIPS i 112138 05/06/86 2.13- ED PHILLIPS 11213805/06/86 11.39- ED PHILLIPS__.._._.. 112138 05/06/86 35.44- ED PHILLIPS 112138 05/06/86 7.71- ED PHILLIPS j "' 112138 05/06/86 559.50 ED PHILLIPS__ 112138 05/06/86 39970.06 ED PHILLIPS 112138 05/06/86 19772.01 ED PHILLIPS 112138... 05/06/86 104.50 ED PHILLIPS 04 -30 -86 PAGE 8 ACCOUNT NO. INV.__p P.O. # MESSAGE 27 -4604- 661 -66 MANUAL 27- 4624- 664 -66 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4630 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 003 -00 50 -3710- 822 -82 50- 3710- 822 -82 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710 - 642 -84 50- 3710- 842 -84 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710- 842 -84 50- 3710-862 -86 50- 3710- 862 -86 50- 4626 - 822 -82 :0- 4626 - 842 -84 50- 4626-842 -84 50- 4626 - 862 -86 50 -4628- 822 -82 50- 4628-842 -84 50- 4628-842 -84 50 -4628- 842-84 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50 -4632- 862 -86 * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL 'i 112138 05/06/86 152.00 ED PHILLIPS - °0 -9628- 822 -82 MANUAL 112138 .05/06/86 239.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL I * **-CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL _- 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842-84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628-822 -82 MANUAL 'i 112138 05/06/86 152.00 ED PHILLIPS - °0 -9628- 822 -82 MANUAL 112138 .05/06/86 239.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL I 04 -30 -8c GE 9 ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. 9 MESSAGE 50- 4628-842 -84 1986 C OF EDINA MANUAL CHECK STER MANUAL ~ MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL _ CHOCK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 112138 05/06/86 51.60 ED PHILLIPS ! 112138 05/06/86 691.48 ED PHILLIPS 112138 05/06/86 569.58 ED PHILLIPS 112138 05106/86 385.50 ED PHILLIPS 112138 05/06/8E 106.68 ED PHILLIPS j 89430.37 • � rlrfrf 112190 05 /06 /8E 7.79— GRIGGS COOPER AND C 1112190 05/06/86 389.30 GRIGGS COOPER AND C �j rrrfrr 381.51 112198 04/23/86 69483.17 GROUP HEALTH EMP PO HOSP rf *frr 69483.17 V, 112435 05/06/86 4.10— PRIOR WINE CO ti 112435 05/06/86 10.06— PRIOR WINE CO 112435 05/06/86 5.97— PRIOR WINE CO 112435 05106/86 205.20 PRIOR WINE CO ♦, 112435 05/06/86 503.00 PRIOR WINE CO 112435 05/06/86 298.68 PRIOR MINE CO -'112435 05/01/86 24.25 PRIOR WINE INVENTORY ., 19011.00 fff trt 0112442 34/23/86 129897.56 PHYSICIANS HEALTH EMP PD PHP 129891.56 V •99999 ` 112451 05/06/86 .52— QUALITY WINE 112451 05/06/86 19.42— QUALITY WINE 112451 05/06/86 27.34— QUALITY WINE 112451 05/06/86 6.03— QUALITY WINE 112451 05/06/86 12.24 QUALITY WINE 112451 05/06/86 16.00— QUALITY WINE �., 112451 05/06/86 .41— QUALITY WINE 112451 05/06/86 75.94— QUALITY WINE 112451 05/06/86 12.00— QUALITY WINE 112451 05/06/86 3.10— QUALITY WINE 112451 05/06/86 9.50— QUALITY WINE 112451 05/06/86 971.03 QUALITY WINE r„ 112451 05/06/86 20.84 QUALITY WINE 112451 05/06/86 19361.30 QUALITY WINE 112451 05/06/86 39797.34 QUALITY WINE 112451 05/06/86 26.00 QUALITY WINE 112451 05/06/86 301.86 QUALITY WINE 112451 05/06/86 800.05 QUALITY WINE 112451 05/06/86 612.30— QUALITY WINE 04 -30 -8c GE 9 ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. 9 MESSAGE 50- 4628-842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710'- 842 -84 50- 4626- 842 -84 10- 4156- 510 -51 50- 3710- 822 -82 50- 3710- 842 -84 50- 3710-862-86 50 -4628- 822 -82 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628- 862 -86 50- 4632-822 -82 10 -4156- 510 -51 50 -3710- 822 -82 50 -3710- 822 -82 50- 3710- 842 -84 50- 3110- 842 -84 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50 -3110- 862 -86 50 -3710- 862 -86 50- 3710- 862 -86 50 -3710- 862 -86 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 842 -84 50- 4626 - 842 -84 50- 4626 - 862 -86 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628- 842 -84 50 -4628- 842 -84 50 -4628- 842 -84 * ** —CKS MANUAL MANUAL * ** —CKS MANUAL * ** —CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL ** *—CKS MANUAL * ** —CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL I �m 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 04 -30 -86 PAGE 10 CHECK NO. 04TE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P -0. N MESSAGE r! 112451 05/06/86 600.00 QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 112451 05/06/86 475.25 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL X112451 05/06/86 155.42 QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 79744.77 • t;• -CKS 112540 05/06/86 -94.82 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -3700- 822 -82 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 119.51 -1 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3700- 842 -84 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 37.04 -) TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3700- 842 -84 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 .36 -.- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 2.05 - TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL - 112540 05/06186 .30 -• TWIN CITY WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 _ 8.32 -, TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 1.00 -1 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3110- 822 -82 MANUAL Y 112540 05/06/86 ,81.47 - TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 _ 36.56 -1 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 .14. TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL - 112540 05/06/86 14.00- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 .01 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 .14- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL i 112540 05/06/86 _ 7.37 -' TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 2.82 - TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL ' 112540 05/06/86 .14- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL - -, 112540 05/06/86 3.51- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL !_ 112540 05/06/86 .14 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL ! 112540 05/06/86 14.00- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 .05 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 , 2.72 - TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL ' 112540 05/06/86 a .14 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 30.76 -m TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL -i 112540 05/06/86 1.37- TWIN CITY WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 2.05 - TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 , 2.25- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 .99- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 .41 =t TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 .99 -- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 . 3.46 -, TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL i 112540 05/06/86 0715.82 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 112540 05/01/86 4.00 TWIN CITY INVENTORY 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 415.55 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 _ 19827.65 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 .00 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 112540 05/06/66 .00 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 112540 05/01/86 34.80 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 19537.28` TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 112540 05/01/86 43.75 TWIN CITY INVENTORY 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 112540 05/01/86 12.40 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 .00 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 , 205.30 '4 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 _ 30.12 j TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL " 112540 05/06/86 _ 35.52- TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 -99.75 TWIN CITY WINE °0 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL I 112540 05/06/86 19501.14 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 9628 - 842 -84 MANUAL R.� -i 112540 05/06/86 _ 350.16 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 1986 L OF EDINA CHECK STER 04 -30 -8, AGE 11 CHIJCK NO, DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. b P.O. # MESSAGE 112540 05/06/86 , 281.80 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 46228- 842 -84 MANUAL 112540 05106/86 ,15.15 -. TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 19501.00 -= TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL .•I' 112540 05/06/86 _ 737.25, TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 5.16 -1 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 272.501 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL oi'•i 112540 05/06/86 19501.00 TWIN CITY WINE `_0- 46228- 842 -84 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 19501.00 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 , 1.46 -% TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 19501.14- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628-842 -84 MANUAL 112540 05/01/86 29.60 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL n 112540 05/06/86 19515.00- TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 99.18T TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 112540 - 05/06/86 ;99...18 TWIN CITY MINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 , 343.30, TWIN CITY WINE `_0- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL �.' 112540 05/06/86 , 40.78 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 205.30, TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 112540 05/06186 226.181 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 112540 05/06/86 137.10 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 112540 05/01/86, 9.45 TWIN CITY INVENTORY 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 79507.06 • - ftf fff .ff -CKS r ' 112700 04/23/86 733.60 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 10- 4200 - 200 -20 MANUAL 112700 04/23/,86 90.00 POSTMASTER BULK MAILING 10- 4290 - 510 -51 MANUAL 823.60 • _. 112701 1-1 04/23/86 189.90 COMM LIFE CITY PD LIFE INS 10 -4157- 510 -51 MANUAL 189.90 • 112702 04/23/86 125.00 GOVERMENT TRAINING CONFERENCE 10- 4202- 140 -14 MANUAL I`, ..... 125.00 • ffffff •ff -CKS �.; 119067 05/06/86 7.00- CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 119067 05/06/86 7.00 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 119067 05/06/86 13.82- CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 119067 05/06/86 3.50 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 119067 05/06/86 117.25 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50 -4528- 822 -82 MANUAL 119067 05/06/86 282.62 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 119067 05/06/86 289.62 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628-842 -84 MANUAL ,i 119067. 119067 05/06/86 05/06/86 7.00 289.62- CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50 -4628- 842 -.84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 119067 05/06/86 89.95 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 462228- 862 -86 MANUAL ;.' 119067 05/06/86 2.50 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628-862 -86 MANUAL 489.00 L'_' ffffff fff -CKS 119091 05/01/86 69355.00 CITY OF EDINA TRANSFER 10 -1139- 000 -00 MANUAL 119091 05/01/86 659255.00 - CITY OF EDINA CORRECTION LO- 1139-000 -00 MANUAL 1L9091 05/01/86 _ 49000.00 CITY OF EDINA _ CORRECTION 10 -1129- 000 -00 _ MANUAL 119091 05/01/86 639255.00 CITY OF EDINA TRANSFER 10- 1139 - 000 -00 MANUAL s 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 04 -30 -86 PAGE 12 AMOUNT - VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. p P -0. 9 MESSAGE 29000.00- CITY OF EDINA CORRECTION 10 -11!9- 000 -00 MANUAL 69355.00 * CHECK N0. DATE 9.84- 119091 05/01/86 it f f f f! f 119135 05/06/86 MANUAL 119135 05/06/86 WINE 119135 05/06/86 14.67- 119135 05/06/8E 50 -3710- 822 -82 119135 05/06/86 EAGLE 119135 05/06/86 MANUAL 119135 05/06/86 - " 119135 05/06/86 ''- 119135 05/06/8E 50- 3710- 822 -82 119135 05/06/86 EAGLE 119135 05/06/86 MANUAL 119135 05/06/86 WINE 119135 05/06/86 16.79- 119135 05/06/86 50- 3710- 862 -86 119135 05/06/86 EAGLE 119135 05/06/86 =. 119135 05/06/86 WINE 119135 _ _ 05/06/86 ` 119135 05/06/8E _ 119135 05/06/86 .:I 119135 05/01/86 CHECK REGISTER 04 -30 -86 PAGE 12 AMOUNT - VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. p P -0. 9 MESSAGE 29000.00- CITY OF EDINA CORRECTION 10 -11!9- 000 -00 MANUAL 69355.00 * * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 622 -82 119138 05106186 9.84- * ** -CKS 2.80- EAGLE NINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 2.88- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 14.67- EAGLE WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL .66- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 2.80- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 2.80 EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 83.40- EAGLE WINE 50-3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 5.80- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 16.79- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 22.35- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 733.53 EAGLE WINE 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 49170.16 _ EAGLE WINE _ `_0- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 19117.51 EAGLE WIKE 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 39.77 EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 139.77 EAGLE WINE 50- .4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 39.77- EAGLE MINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 144.00 EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 32.95 _ EAGLE WINE _ 50- 46228- 822 -82 MANUAL 289.75 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 839.53 EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 46.84 EAGLE WINE INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 822 -82 MANUAL 79364.69 19052.25 ED PHILLIPS * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 622 -82 119138 05106186 9.84- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 119133 05/06/86 9.34- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 119138 05/06/86 58.61- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 119138 05/06/86 5.23- ED PHILLIPS r 119138 05/06/86 29 -36- ED PHILLIPS. •'I 119133 05/06/86 2.10'- ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 119138 05/06/86 21.05- ED PHILLIPS _.•- 113138 05/06/86 10.08- ED PHILLIPS 119138 05/06/86 100.76- ED PHILLIPS .119138 05/06/86 3.30- ED PHILLIPS I 119138 05/06/86 4.77- ED PHILLIPS i 119138 05/06/86 29930.59 ED PHILLIPS . 119138 05/06/86 105.22 ED PHILLIPS ";..119138 05/06/86 19468.21 ED PHILLIPS "I 119138 05/06/86 59038.12 ED _ . PHILLIPS •'I 119138 05/06/86 467.10 ED PHILLIPS 119138, 05/06/86 ._,_, •- _., _ 491.75 ED PHILLIPS.-­­­­-, 119138 05/06/86 261.25 ED _ _... _ PHILLIPS 119138 05/06/86 19052.25 ED PHILLIPS 119138 05/06/86 238.50.. ED PHILLIPS 119138 05/06/8E 504.23 ED PHILLIPS 119138 05/01/86 83.01 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY .05/06/86 _ 165.00 ED PHILLIPS 119138 05/01/86 114.05 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 129664.84 • * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 622 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -3110- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -4632- 842 -84 MANUAL 1986 C. OF EDINA CHECK k 3TER 04 -30 -8t GE 13 CHECK NOS DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. 4 MESSAGE rrrrrr kkr -CKS _ 119378 05/06/86 3.35- MARK VII SALES INC 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 119378 05/06/86 167.50 MARK VII SALES INC 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 164.15 • rrrrr• + ++ -CKS ! I _ 119433 05/06/86 3.00 PAUSTIS 8 SONS 50- 4628-822-82 MANUAL 119433 05/06/86 91.92 PAUSTIS 8 SONS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 119433 05/06/86 193.72 PAUSTIS 6 SONS 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL _ 119433 05/06/86 3.00 PAUSTIS 8 SONS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 119433 05/01/8£ 45.84 PAUSTIS 6 SONS INVENTORY 50- 4632-822 -82 MANUAL 119433 05/01/86 91.68 PAUSTIS 8 SONS INVENTORY 50 -4632- 842 -84 MANUAL ' ,119433 05/01/86 68.76 PAUSTIS 6 SONS INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL 497.92 + rr :rrr + ++ -CKS 119435 05/06/86 11.46- PRIOR WINE CO 50 -3110- 822 -82 MANUAL 119435 05/06/8£ 6.48- PRIOR WINE CO 50- 3710 - 662 -86 MANUAL 119435 05/06/86 572.82 PRIOR WINE CO 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 119435 05/06/86 323.88 PRIOR WINE CO 50- 4628-862 -86 MANUAL 878.76 + rr•rrr + ++ -CKS 119451 05/06/86 5.92- QUALITY MINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 113451 05/06/86 .73- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 119451 05/06/8£ .72- QUALITY MINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 119451 05/06/8£ 27.60- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 119451 05/06/86 68.48- QUALITY MINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 119451 05/06/86 14.72- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 119451 05/05/86 12.81- QUALITY WINE 50- 3110- 862 -86 MANUAL 119451 05/06/86 50.82- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL �. 119451 05/06/86 3.66- QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 119451 05/06/86 19380.00 QUALITY WINE 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 119451 05/06/86 39424.15 QUALITY WINE 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 119451 05/06/86 29541.30 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 119451 05/06/86 36.62 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 119451 05/06/8£ 36.00 QUALITY WINE 50- 46228- 822 -82 MANUAL 119451 05/06/86 296.00 QUALITY LINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 119451 05/06/86 15.63- QUALITY MINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 119451 05/06/86 736.00 QUALITY WINE 50- 46228- 842 -84 MANUAL 119451 05106/86 183.10 QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 119451 05/06/86 640.95 QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 99073.03 rrrr•. + *+ -CKS 119522 05/01/86 69467.52 AMOCO OIL GASOLINE 10- 4612 - 560 -56 MANUAL 69467.52 + rrrrrr + ++ -CKS 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 04 -30 -86 PAGE 14 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 119540 05/06/86 79.67- TWIN CITY WINE 50 -3700- 862 -86 MANUAL 119540 05/06/86 3.79- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 119540 05/06/86 58.85- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 119540 05/06/86 2.18- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 119540 05/06/86 .75- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL =" 119540 05/06/86 4.60- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 119540 05/06/86 11.39- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3110- 842 -84 MANUAL 119540 05/06/86 74.74- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 119540 05/06/86 23.49- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 119540 05/06/86 24.08- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 119540 05/06/86 69.61- TWIN CITY WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 119540 05/06/86 9.01- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 119540 05/06/86 4.84- TWIN CITY WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 119540 05/06/86 9.01 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3110- 862 -86 MANUAL 119540 05/06/8E 2.80- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 119540 05/06/86 9.01- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 119540 05/01/86 1.60 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL L' 119540 05/06/86 29942.66 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 119540 05/06/86 19174.54 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 119540 05/06/8E 39736.61 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 119540 05/01/86 9.60 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50- 9626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 119540 05/06/86 .00 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 119540 05/06/86 39480.20 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 119540 05/06/86 19204.14 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 119540 05/01/86 8.10 TWIN CITY FEDERAL INVENTORY 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL j 119540 05/06/8E 215.80 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 119540 05/06/86 379.13 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 119540 05/01/8E 4.80 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 119540 05/06/86 73.98 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 119540 05/06/86 459.52 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 119540 05/01/86 34.00 TWIN CITY FEDERAL INVENTORY 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 119540 05/06/86 19138.37 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 119540 05/06/86 483.28 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 119540 05/06/86 903.24 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 119540 05/06/86 902.34 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 119540 05/06/86 902.34- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 119540 05/06/86 278.48 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL " 119540 05/01/86 21.15 TWIN CITY FEDERAL INVENTORY 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 'j 169179.40 • frffrf ••• -CKS 119700 05/01/86 360.00 LEAGUE MN CITIES REGISTRATION 10- 4202- 140 -14 MANUAL 360.00 • 119701 05101/86 217.75 MARY NELSON BANQUET 10- 4206- 500 -50 MANUAL `r 217.75 • fiffrr *•• -CKS I 119768 05/01/8E 257.00 TRAVEL AGENCYU HRH 10- 1145- 000 -00 MANUAL _._.._119768. 05/01/86 110.00 TRAVEL AGENCY MEETING EXPENSE 10- 4206 - 440 -44 MANUAL 367.00 • ffrf , ff• -CKS e 1986 OF EDINA CHECK STER 04 -30 -81 AGE 15 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. i P.O. p MESSAGE I' _ 799258.47 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 19351.06 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 24.40 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND 19335.60 FUND 21 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 439.49 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 54.57 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 119816.84 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 1939269.75 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND "I 2879550.18 TOTAL AFF�XNED FOR PAYMENT, CH::Cr, rEct;Srea MTFD,��,. Computer checks 68168 thru 68175 68181 thru 68211 69331 thru 69381 I 1. I ,I 1. j i if I. 1 I ,I i ' • •