HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-06-02_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
JUNE 2, 1986
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
MINUTES of HRA Meetings of May 5.and 19, 1986, approved as submitted or corrected by
motion of , seconded by
AWARD OF BID - Edinborough Parking Ramp
ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
PROCLAMATION - American Heart Association Day in Edina
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION - Bob Elledge
EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION - Dennis Cain
MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of May 5, 1986, approved as submitted or corrected by
motion of seconded by
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Zoning Ordinance: First and
Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council
to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of
the Council required to pass. Lot Divisions, Plats, Appeals: Favorable rollcall
vote of majority of quorum required to pass. Final Plat Approval of Property
Zoned Planned District: 3/4 favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council
required to pass.
A. Final Plat Approval
1. Blake Woods - Generally located east of Dearborn•Street and north of
Belmore Lane
B. Lot Division - 5433 -5435 Vernon Avenue South —Alvin and Janet Jaffee
C. Appeal from Board of ApReals Decision - KMSP
D. Set Hearing Date (6/16/86)
1. Lot Division - Gunnar Danielson - 4720 West 66th Street
II. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
III. AWARD OF BIDS
A. Public Improvements - SS -375, WM -360, St.S -180, C -144
B. Asphalt Roller
IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Human Relations Commission - 1987 Budget Funding Requests
B. Centennial Commission - Budget Request
C. Bloomington /Homart Road Project
D. I -494 Corridor Study
E. Wine Licensing and Procedures (Contd from 5/19/86)
F. On -Sale Wine License Renewals
G. Club On -Sale Liquor License Renewals .
H. Food Establishment License - Gim Loong
I. 1986 Firefighter's Contract
J. West 50th Street Final Plan Approval and Bid Authorization
K. France Avenue Improvement - Set Hearing Date (6/16/86)
L. Report on Massage License Ordinance No. 1353
M. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council
N. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items
V. COMMUNICATIONS
A. Petition for Vacation of Portion of Virginia Avenue - Set Hearing Date (7/7/86)
VI. ORDINANCES. First Reading: Requires offering of-Ordinance only. Second Reading:
Three - fifths (3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required
to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four - fifths (4/5) favorable rollcall vote
of all members of Council required to pass.
A. Second. Reading
1. Ordinance No. 825 -AlO - Adding Location Requirements for Emergency Power
Generators, A.C. Compressors and Playground Equipment and Height
Restrictions for Wind Generators and Solar Collectors
2. Ordinance No. 1001 -A4 - Making It a Misdemeanor to Operate Certain
Vehicles or Devices in Designated Areas of City
Agenda
Edina City Council
June 2, 1986
Page Two
VII. RESOLUTIONS
A. Division of Voting Precinct 15 and Polling Locations
VIII. FINANCE
A. Claims Paid. Motion of was seconded by for payment of the
following claims as per pre -list of 6/2/86: General Fund $250,186.94,
Revenue Sharing Fund $225,000.00, Working Capital Fund $522.04, Art
Center $2,542.87, Capital Fund $2,811.50, Swimming Pool Fund $1,507.45,
Golf Course Fund $31,883.72, Recreation Center Fund $20,114.48 Gun Range
Fund $720.78, Utility Fund $215,690.46, Liquor Dispensary Fund $87,941.44,
Construction Fund $70,045.45, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $260,386.25,
Total $1,169,353.38
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Mon June 9 Special Meeting (Survey Results - Strategic 7:00 P.M. Mgr Conf Rm
Planning - Role of Council with Surrounding
Communities)
Mon June 16 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Room
.Tune 17 -20 LMC Annual Conference Duluth
Mon July 7 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Room
Mon July 14 Special Council Meeting (Service Levels) 7:00 P.M. Mgr Conf Rm
Mon July 21 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Room
AGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR,PIEETING
JUNE 2, 1986
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
MINUTES of HRA Meetings of May 5. and 19, 1986, approved as submitted or corrected by
motion of seconded by
AWARD OF BID - Edinborough Parking Ramp
ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION - Bob Elledge
EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION - Dennis Cain
MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of May 5, 1986, approved as submitted or corrected by
motion of , seconded by
I.
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Zoning Ordinance: First and
Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council
to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of
the Council required to pass. Lot Divisions, Plats, Appeals: Favorable rollcall
vote of majority of quorum required to pass. Final Plat Approval of Property
Zoned Planned District: 3/4 favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council
required to pass.
A. Final Plat Approval
1. Blake Woods - Generally located east of Dearborn-Street and north of
Belmore Lane
B. Lot Division - 5433 -5435 Vernon Avenue South - Alvin and Janet Jaffee
C. Appeal from Board of Anneals Decision - KMSP
D. Set Hearing Date (6 16 86)
1. Lot Division - Gunnar Danielson - 4720 West 66th Street
II. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
III AWARD OF BIDS
A. Public Improvements - SS -375, WM -360, St.S -180, C -144
B. Asphalt Roller
IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Human Relations Commission - 1987 Budget Funding Requests
B. Centennial Commission - Budget Request
C. Bloomington /Homart Road Project
D. I -494 Corridor Study
E. Wine Licensing and Procedures (Contd from 5/19/86)
F. On -Sale Wine License Renewals
G. Club On -Sale Liquor License Renewals
H. Food Establishment License - Gim Loong
I. 1986 Firefighter's Contract
J. West 50th Street Final Plan Approval and Bid Authorization
K. France Avenue Improvement - Set Hearing Date (6/16/86)
L. Report on Massage License Ordinance No. 1353
M. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council
N. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items
V. COMMUNICATIONS
A. Petition for Vacation of Portion of Virginia Avenue - Set Hearing Date (7/7/86)
VI. ORDINANCES. First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading:
Three - fifths (3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required
to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four - fifths (4/5) favorable rollcall vote
of all members of Council required to pass.
A. Second.Reading
1. Ordinance No. 825 -A10 - Adding Location Requirements for Emergency Power
Generators, A.C. Compressors and Playground Equipment and Height
Restrictions for Wind Generators and Solar Collectors
2. Ordinance No. 1001 -A4 - Making It a Misdemeanor to Operate Certain
Vehicles or Devices in Designated Areas of City
Agenda
Edina City Council
June 2, 1986
Page Two
VII. RESOLUTIONS
A. Division of Voting Precinct 15 and Polling Locations
VIII. FINANCE
A. Claims Paid. Motion of was seconded by for payment of the
following claims as per pre -list of 6/2/86: General Fund $250,186.94,
Revenue Sharing Fund $225,000:00, Working Capital Fund $522.04, Art
Center $2,542.87, Capital Fund $2,811.50, Swimming Pool Fund $1,507.45,
Golf Course Fund $31,883.72, Recreation Center Fund $20;114.48 Gun Range
Fund $720.78, Utility Fund $215,690.46, Liquor Dispensary Fund $87,941.44,
Construction Fund $70,045.45, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $260,386.25,
Total $1,169,353.38
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Mon
June
9
Special Meeting
(Survey Results - Strategic
7:00
P.M.
Mgr Conf Rm.
Planning - Role
of Council with Surrounding
Communities)
Mon -
June
16
Regular Council
Meeting
7:00
P.M.
Council Room
June 17 -20
LMC Annual Conference
Duluth
Mon
July
7
Regular Council
Meeting
7:00
P.M.
Council Room
Mon
July
14
Special Council
Meeting (Service Levels)
7:00
P.M.
Mgr Conf Rm.
Mon
July
21
Regular Council
Meeting
7:00
P.M.
Council Room
., it . A
MINUTES
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MAY 5, 1986
Answering rollcall were Commissioners Richards, Turner and Courtney.
CONVEYANCE OF LOT 6, BLOCK 1, EDINBOROUGH ADDITION APPROVED. Mr. Rosland advised
that construction will now begin on the Condominium Development Phase III of
the Edinborough project and that conveyance of Lot 6, Block 1 is now recommended.
Commissioner Turner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION RATIFYING AND AFFIRMING THE
EXECUTION OF VARIOUS OTHER DOCUMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows:
1. Recitals. The HRA and the Edina City Council have previously approved a
redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, sub-
division 15, designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan ").
Acting pursuant to the Plan, the HRA has acquired certain land in the area
included in the Plan and it has been proposed that the HRA sell and transfer a
portion of such land to the East Edina Housing Foundation (the "Foundation "),
pursuant to a Land Sale Agreement by and between the HRA and the Foundation
(the "Agreement "). By a resolution adopted May 6, 1985, the HRA approved the
form of the Agreement and authorized the Chairman and Secretary or Assistant
Secretary of the HRA to execute and deliver the Agreement on behalf of the HRA
with such modifications as are deemed appropriate and approved by the attorney
for the HRA and the Executive Director 'of the HRA. Pursuant to such authorization
the Chairman and Secretary of the HRA have executed and delivered the Agreement
to the Foundation. By a resolution adopted March 31, 1986, the HRA approved the
form of (i) a Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Development for
Condominium Development Phase II, by and between the HRA, the Foundation and
Edinborough Condominium Partnership, (ii) Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement,
(iii) Amendment No. 1 to the Declaration (of Easements) and (iv) Amendment
No. 1 to the Agreement (Covenants Running With The Land). In connection with
the transactions contemplated by the Agreement there has been prepared and
submitted to the HRA a Land Sale Agreement And Contract for Private Redevelop-
ment for Condominium Development Phase III, by and between the HRA, the
Foundation and Edinborough Condominium Partnership (the "Phase III Agreement ").
2. Ratification of Execution and Delivery of Agreement. The execution and
delivery of the documents listed at (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) above, and any
and all other documents executed and delivered in connection therewith by the
Chairman and Assistant Secretary of the HRA is hereby ratified and confirmed.
3. Authorization for Execution and Delivery of Documents. The terms and
provisions of the Phase III Agreement are hereby approved subject to such
modifications as are deemed appropriate and approved by the attorney for the
HRA and the Executive Director of the HRA, which approval shall be conclusively
evidenced by the execution of such documents by the Chairman and Secretary or
Assistant Secretary of the HRA. The Chairman and Secretary or Assistant Secretary
of the HRA are directed to execute such document as so modified. The Chairman
and Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the HRA are also authorized and directed
to execute such other instruments as may be required to accomplish the transactions
contemplated by such document including, but not limited to, any amendments or
supplements to the Agreement, and such other agreements as may be necessary to
accomplish the transactions contemplated by the Agreement as amended. The
execution of such documents and of any such amendments, supplements or agreements
H.R.A. Minutes of 5/5/86
Page Two
by the Chairman and Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the HRA shall be
conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents by the HRA in accordance
with this Resolution.
Dated as of the 5th day pf y, 1986.
Attest. G, C airman
xe utive Director
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Commissioner Richards, and upon vote being taken thereon the following voted
in favor thereof:
Richards, Turner and Courtney
and the following voted against the same:
None
whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted and was signed by
the Chairman and his signature attested by the Executive Director.
BID AWARDED FOR COURTYARD DRAINS - PHASE II CONDOMINIUMS. Mr. Rosland presented
tabulation of bids for courtyard drains for the Phase II Condominiums of the
Edinborough Project showing Wenzel Mechanical at $11,400.00, Klamm Mechanical at
$13,660 and Blaylock Plumbing at $11,855.00. Motion of Commissioner Turner was
seconded by Commissioner Richards for award of bid to recommended low bidder,
Wenzel Mechanical, at $11,400.00.
Ayes: Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, the meeting was ad rned by
motion of Commissioner Turner, seconded by Commissioner R3lg`hards. /Mn carried.
Gordon ghes
Executive Virector
. it . %�
MINUTES
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MAY 19, 1986
Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Richards, Turner and Courtney.
MINUTES of the HRA Meetings of March 31, April 3, 14 and 21, 1986, were approved
as submitted by motion of Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Turner.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR EDINBOROUGH PAINTING CONTRACT. Mr. Rosland recalled that at its
meeting of April 14, 1986, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority rejected the
painting bids submitted for the Edinborough project and ordered that the painting
be rebid. Tabluation of bids showed Functional Design Painting & Decorating
at $58,465.00, Swanson & Youngdale at $59,125.00, Sander & Company, Inc. at
$59,400.00, Commercial Coatings at $59,330.00 and J. B. Nelson at $89,218.00.
Because low bidder, Functional Design Painting and Decorating, submitted no bid
bond, it is recommended that the bid be awarded to Swanson & Youngdale. Motion
of Commissioner Turner was seconded by Commissioner Kelly for award of painting
contract to Swanson & Youngdale at $59,128.00.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, motion of Commissioner Turner
was seconded by Commissioner Kelly to adjourn the me hg.,,,-,Motion cgrr�/eo.
Gordon L. Hugh
e
Executiv Dir for
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Housing & Redevelo me Aut or'
FROM: Gordon Hughes
SUBJECT: EDINBOROUGH PARKING DECK
DATE: June 2, 1986
Bids were opened on May 30, 1986, for the subject parking deck. The
following tabulation summarizes the results:
PACKAGE I LOW BIDDER AMOUNT
Earthwork /Concrete Bor -Son Construction $733,900
Landscape Margolis Brothers 19,500
PACKAGE III
Storm Sewer Nova /Frost 9,670
Metal work Stanley Iron Works 35,130
PACKAGE V
Painting Commercial Coating 4,500
PACKAGE VI
Electrical Commonwealth Electric 91,950
TOTAL $894,650
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends award to the low bidders for Packages I, III, IV and V.
We recommend that Package VI should be rejected and re -bid as it is sub-
stantially over budget. We recommend that the award of Package II be post-
poned pending the results of a redesign of the planting areas.
GH /sw
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
MAY 5, 1986
Answering rollcall were Members Richards, Turner and Mayor Courtney. Member
Kelly entered the meeting at 7:10 p.m.
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING .OF MARCH 17 APPROVED; MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF
APRIL 21 CORRECTED. Member Richards made a motion to approve the minutes of
the Regular Meeting of March 17, 1986 as submitted and to approve the minutes of
April 21, 1986 with the following correction: Motion for preliminary plat
approval for Woodhaven to read "Member Kelly then moved adoption of the following
resolution, subject to these conditions: 1) final plat approval, 2) subdivision
dedication, 3) developer's agreement, 4) redevelopment contract, 5) vacation of
Summit Avenue and appropriate easements with townhouse owners, and 6) that the
sidewalks be extended to the property line. Motion was seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED; ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. P -L -28
ORDERED. Engineer Fran Hoffman explained that the public hearing on Ornamental
Street Lighting Improvement No. P -L -28 had been continued from the meeting of
April 21, 1986 to determine which height pole the neighbors wanted. He advised
that in talking with the representative of the neighbors that they would like a
30 foot pole for the installation. No objections or comments being heard, Member
Richards introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. L -28
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that this
Council heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly published and mailed to
owners of each parcel within the area proposed to be assessed on the following
proposed improvement:
1. CONSTRUCTION OF ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. P -L -28 IN THE
FOLLOWING:
Between 4827 and 4821 West Sunnyslope Road
and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice, the
Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being
fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with
the construction of said improvement, except that the pole be 30 feet in height,
including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the
acquisition of necessary easements and rights for construction and maintenance
of such improvement; that said improvement is hereby designated and shall be
referred to in all subsequent proceedings as:
No. 1 Above ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. L -28
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
FINAL PLAT APPROVED FOR INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION. Planner Craig Larsen presented
the request for final plat approval for Indian Hills 3rd Addition, generally
located south of McCauley Trail West and west of Gleason Road. He recalled that
the Council granted preliminary plat approval for the subject R -1 and R -2 sub-
division on August 19, 1985. All conditions for final plat approval have been
meet. Mr. Larsen explained that no parkland dedication is required since it is
a replat of an existing plat and part of The Timbers plat and creates no new
buildable lots. Staff would recommend final plat approval. No objection or
comment being heard, Member Turner introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
FINAL PLAT APPROVAL GRANTED
INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION ", platted by The Minnesota
South District of the Lutheran Church- Missouri Synod, a Minnesota non - profit
corporation, .Cross View Lutheran Church, a Minnesota non - profit corporation,
Folke R. Victorsen, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, Gustafson & Associates, Inc.,
a Minnesota general partnership, and Norwest Bank Bloomington, N.A., and
presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of May 5, 1986, be and
is hereby granted final plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Richards.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
FINAL PLAT APPROVED FOR DEARBORN ADDITION.
Planner Larsen presented the request
for final plat approval for Dearborn Addition, generally located north of Belmore
5/5/86
Lane and west of Dearborn Street. He recalled that the Council had granted a
concept final plat approval for the subject property on September 17, 1984.
Since that time all conditions required for final plat approval have been met
and final plat approval is recommended, subject to payment of a subdivision
dedication fee based on the creation of four new buildable lots with a land
value of $80,000. No objection or comment being heard, Member Richards intro-
duced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
FINAL PLAT APPROVAL GRANTED
FOR DEARBORN ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that
that certain plat entitled " DEARBORN ADDITION ", platted by John A. Miller
and Wanda W. Miller, husband and wife, Miller Properties, Inc., a Minnesota
corporation, and Bernard G. Kuenzli and Beverly Elizabeth Kuenzli, husband
and wife, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of
May 5, 1986 be and is hereby granted final plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
HEARING DATE SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by
Member Richards setting May 19, 1986 as hearing date for the following Planning
matters:
1) Preliminary Plat - Valley View Heights 3rd Addition - Generally located
south of Valley View Road and east of Tracy Avenue
2) Rezoning - R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -3 Planned Residential
District - Robert Hansen - Generally located north of Crosstown Highway
and east and north of Vernon Court
Ayes: Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
(Member Kelly entered the meeting at this point on the Agenda.)
PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE NO. 1031 (STORAGE
OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES); ORDINANCE NO. 312 (DOG ENCLOSURE SETBACKS); ORDINANCE
NO. 825 (SETBACK FOR SKATEBOARD RAMPS, LOCATION OF A.C. COMPRESSORS, GENERATORS
AND PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT, HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS FOR WIND GENERATORS AND SOLAR
COLLECTORS). Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered
placed on file. Mayor Courtney stated that the Council has ordered this public
hearing to consider amendments to three City ordinances. These amendments are
a result of Council review of all nuisance and accessory use ordinances. After
considering the recommendation of the Community Development and Planning Com-
mission, the Council ordered staff to prepare the amendments. Mayor Courtney
stated that Mr. Larsen would explain each of the amendments and then testimony
would be taken on each.
Ordinance No. 1031 - Mr. Larsen stated that Ordinance No. 1031 -A3 is an amend-
ment to the nuisance ordinance which addresses among other things the permitted
storage of recreational vehicles. He presented a graphic showing the definition
of "recreational vehicles" and the existing permitted location for storage in
R1, R2.and PRD 1 -2 Districts as on the driveway not within 15 feet of street curb
and not within 5 feet of the lot line; one vehicle per dwelling unit. The amend-
ment proposes they be stored in a garage or other lawfully construction building;
no restriction as to number. Speaking in opposition to the proposed amendment
were: C. M. Simonson, 305 Harrison Avenue So.; Maged /Cindy Daoud, 5716 Tracy Ave.;
Mibby Perry, 4724 W. 70th Street; Mrs. Joe Givens, 6566 France Avenue;'Betty
Gustafson, 4312 Branson Avenue; Jim Peterson, Custom Coach, 805 Excelsior Ave.;
Tom Antool, 4509 Andover Road; Bob Konzelman, 6529 Wilryan Avenue; Vern Palmer,
7500 Cahill Road; Neal Page, 4504 W. 64th Street; S. T. Robb, 6212 Rolf Avenue;
John Erickson, 5805 Concord Avenue; John Davis, 5712 Code Avenue; Frank Oslund,
4141 Parklawn Avenue; William Basill, 5045 Windsor Avenue; Jim Grotz, 5513 Park
Place; John Sias, 6204 Ewing Avenue So.; Bob Singer, 6112 Idylwood Avenue; Rose
Marie Nickols, 6521 Cherokee Trail; Gary Huber, 5406 York Avenue So.; Lee Ildstad,
5317 Windsor Avenue; Jean Konzelman, 6529 Wilryan Avenue; Tom Condon, 417 Jackson
Avenue; Dennis Winter, 409 Jackson Avenue; Joel Hanse, 305 Adams Avenue; John
Mackey, 4617 W. 56th Street; Rebecca Milanese, 6404 Wilryan Avenue; Paul
Laederach, 4633 Bruce Avenue; Lou Opperman, 5713 Melody Lane; Loren Schoenzeit,
7120 Fleetwood Drive; Brent Hofer, 5321 Lockmoor Drive; Don Nelson, 6709 Indian
Hills Road; Jim Miller, 4920 Trillium Lane; Ken Lee, 5108 Roberts Place; Roger
Post, 5501 Knoll Drive; Alice Burnell, 5416 Creek View Lane; Paul Burke, 27 Circle
West; Lucille Johnson, 6304 Westwood Court; Bob Klein, 7300 Claredon Drive; Joe
Hauser, 5045 W. 66th Street; Olaf Lee, 6037 Oaklawn Avenue; William Douglas,
4409 Branson Street; Howard Walters, 420 John Street; and Jane Linton, 4509 And-
over Road. Mayor Courtney then asked the Council for their comments. Member
Turner stated that in view of the discussions the Council had in looking at all
the ordinances with regard to nuisances, setback requirements, etc. several
months ago, and in view of the comments made at this meeting, she had not changed
her opinion from the first discussions and believes that the ordinance should
Y
. 5'5/86
remain as it is. It provides a combination of both reasonable restrictions with
allowing people to have at least one recreational vehicle. Member Kelly agreed,
adding that one extra vehicle per household is all that should be stored in
the driveway. Member Richards commented that from the discussion there is
obviously a perception of what the proposed ordinance does or intends. That
it is important for everyone at this hearing to understand that zoning is
a proper tool to make this community a better place in which to live and that
we do have strict code enforcement; that in most part ordinances are designed
to make this a better community. He added that from the comments made, many
are sensitive to their neighbors and have tried to respond in a reasonable
fashion as to how to be a good neighbor; that there are others who disregard
their neighbor's concerns, abuse the ordinances and are not sensitive to things
that impact their neighbors. He said he felt there should be proper and reason-
able regulation of zoning, which has been validated, and would support doing
something but that there is not the consensus to do it. Mayor Courtney said
he had not changed his opinion that the proposed amendment would govern more
than the Council should; that one of the efforts of the Council has been to
reduce the making of rules. Therefore, he could not support the amendment
and that the comments made helped confirm his position. After discussion as
to action to be taken to clarify the Council's position, Member Turner made a
motion not to amend Ordinance No. 1031 as proposed. Motion was seconded by
Member Kelly.
Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Richards
Motion carried.
Ordinance No. 312 - Mr. Larsen explained that Ordinance No. 312 -A2 would amend
the animal control ordinance with regard to acceptable locations for a dog
enclosure. Presently, a dog enclosure must be placed only in a rear yard no
closer than 20 feet to any property line; must be screened from view of adjacent
property by dense vegetation or fencing of 90 percent opacity. In the alterna-
tive, the entire rear yard may be enclosed for keeping the dog. The proposed .
amendment would provide that no dog enclosure be constructed closer to the
allowed buildable area on any adjacent lot than it is to the principal building
on the lot on which it is located. The intent is that it be located closer to
the dog owner's house than to the neighbor's house. Mrs. Shulton, Hansen Road,
asked if the dog enclosure could be located at their rear yard up to the rail-
road tracks. Mr. Larsen clarified that it must be 20 feet from all property
lines, or the entire rear yard could be fenced for the keeping of the dog.
Mrs. Shulton said she objected to the 20 foot setback requirement. There being
no further comment, Member Richards moved adoption of Ordinance No. 312 -A2 as
proposed. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Member Turner stated she
could not support the amendment because it is not consistent with other setback
requirements such as gazeboes, swimming pools, tennis courts, etc. Mayor
Courtney then called the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards
Nays: Turner, Courtney
Motion failed.
Ordinance No. 825 - Mr. Larsen explained that three portions of the Zoning
Ordinance are proposed to be amended as follows: l) In addition to the required
5 -foot setback, emergency power generators, air conditioning compressors and
playground equipment would only be allowed in the rear yard, 2) Setback require-
ments would be added for skateboard ramps, and 3) Wind generators and solar
collectors would be limited to the height of the principal dwelling, or 30 feet,
whichever is less. Section 11, Paragraph F - Would provide these setbacks for
.skateboard ramps in the Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1): Front 30', Side
Street 50', Interior Side Yard 50' and Rear 50'. Mayor Courtney commented that
many complaints were received regarding two skateboard ramps which had been
built and that because they did not comply with the Zoning Ordinance the owners
were asked to take them down. Member Turner asked if skateboard ramps were
defined in the Ordinance. Mr. Rosland said they were not, and that the proposed
amendment was intended to address full ramps with footings,.and not quarter
ramps. Member Richards commented that many individuals have expressed their
concern about unreasonable regulation of their private property and that he felt
this would fall in that category and is no different than swimming pools,
gazeboes, etc. and that the setback requirements should be no different. Member
Kelly raised the question of whether height should be considered in an amendment.
Member Turner suggested that the amendment should include a definition of skate-
board ramps and that she felt setback requirements sould be consistent with those
for swimming pools. After some discussion, it was generally agreed to continue
this matter so that staff could address the issues raised by the Council. No
formal action was taken. Section 11, Paragraph G - Mr. Larsen pointed out that
currently a 5 -foot sideyard setback is required for emergency power generators
and air conditioning compressors. There are no current setback or location
requirements for playground equipment. The amendment would add the additional
requirement that they shall be located only in the rear yard. Member Kelly
5/5/86
asked if an air conditioner compressor now located in a sideyard needs to be
replaced, would it then have to be relocated in the rear yard. If the amend-
ment is adopted, Mr. Larsen said it was his opinion that it would have to comply
or receive a variance. Member Kelly said she could not support the amendment
if it meant considerable expense to, the owner to relocate the air conditioner
in the rear yard. Mayor Courtney said he agreed with that position and that
the amendment should only apply to new air conditioners, not replacement units.
Speaking in opposition to the proposed amendment were Paul Laederach, 4633 Bruce
Avenue and an unidentified man. There being no further comment, Member Richards
offered First Reading of the amendment to Ordinance No. 825, Section 11,
Paragraph G providing that emergency power generators, air conditioning
compressors, and playground equipment shall be located only in the rear yard.
Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Courtney
Nays: Turner
First Reading granted.
Section 11, Paragraph F, Subparagraph 3 - Mr. Larsen explained.that currently
wind generators and solar collectors are limited to a maximum height of 30 feet.
The amendment would add the additional requirement that they be no greater in
height than the principal structure. Member Turner asked if existing generators
and collectors would be grandfathered in; Mr. Larsen responded that they would
be.. Maged Daoud, 5716 Tracy Avenue, commented that for a one story house if wind
generators are limited to no greater height than the principal structure it would
be useless. There being no further comment, Member Richards offered First Reading
of the amendment to Ordinance No. 825, Section 11, Paragraph F, Subparagraph.3,
providing that wind generators and solar collectors shall be limited to 30 feet
or the height of the principal structure, whichever is less. Motion was seconded
by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Courtney
Nays: Turner
First Reading granted.
STREET NAME CHANGE ORDINANCE NO. 16 ADOPTED; EAST VIEW DRIVE CHANGED TO EASTVIEW
DRIVE. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered.placed
on file. Mr. Rosland presented the petition for change of name of East View
Drive to "Eastview Drive ". No comment or objection being heard, Member Kelly,
moved adoption of Ordinance No. 16, with waiver of Second Reading as follows:
STREET NAME CHANGE ORDINANCE NO. 16
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. East View Drive is hereby renamed "Eastview Drive ".
Sec. 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon
passage and publication.
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Ordinance adopted.
(Member Richards asked to be excused during the public hearing on Cable TV.)
PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON CABLE TV FRANCHISE; RESOLUTION ADOPTED GIVING
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP AND REFINANCING PLAN. Affidavits of
Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Mr. Rosland
recalled that the Council adopted the Relief Ordinance intended to provide
financial relief to Rogers Cablesystems who is the Grantee of the cable TV
franchise for the member cities of SWSCC. The Relief Ordinance provided for a
modification of Roger's obligations for a period of time in order to permit
them to refinance their long -term debt. Rogers has now proposed a refinancing
plan and is seeking approval by the member cities. The plan has been recommended
for approval by the Operating Committee and SWSCC. The plan provides for a change
in ownership of Rogers' general partner through a transfer of shares to Rogers
American Cable Corp., a wholly -owned subsidiary of Robers Cablesystems of America.
This transfer will strengthen the finacial position of Rogers and will facilitate
the refinancing of their debt. Mr. Rosland stated that Cliff Williams, General
Manager of Rogers Cablesystems, was present to answer questions. There was no
comment or objections from the public. Member Kelly then moved adoption of the
following resolution:
A RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL
TO A CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP AND OF A REFINANCING
PLAN OF THE CITY'S CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE
5/5/86
WHEREAS, the City of Edina, Minnesota, ( "City ") has granted a cable tele-
vision franchise ( "the Franchise ") to Rogers Cablesystems of Minnesota Limited
Partnership ( "the Grantee ") pursuant to City's cable communications ordinance
( "the Franchise Ordinance'.'); and
WHEREAS, City has also adopted an ordinance (the "Relief Ordinance ") intended
to provide financial relief to Grantee by providing for a modification of
Grantee's obligations for a period of time in order to permit refinancing of
Grantee's long -term debt and to enhance its financial viability; and
WHEREAS, Grantee has now proposed a refinancing plan, as contemplated by the
Franchise Ordinance and the Relief Ordinance and seeks approval of such plan;
and
WHEREAS, Rogers Cable systems of Minnesota, Inc. ( "RCMI ") is the general
partner of Grantee and is a wholly -owned subsidiary of Robers U.S. Cablesystems,
Inc. ( "RUSCI ") ; and
WHEREAS, the proposed refinancing calls for a change in ownership of Grantee's
general partner through transfer of the ownership of the shares of RCMI from
RUSCI to Rogers American Cable Corp. ( "RACC "), a sholly -owned subsidiary of
Robers Cablesystems of America, Inc. (RCA "); and
WHEREAS, RCMI has represented to the Southwest Suburban Cable Communications
Commission ( "SWSCC "), which acts on behalf of the City on certain matters
related to cable television, that in conjunction with the proposed refinancing
of Grantee, RCA will make use,of its line of credit from time to time as
necessary to provide funds to Grantee to meet operating expenses and debt
service payments; and
WHEREAS, it has also been represented by Grantee to SWSCC that such transfer
of stock ownership of RCMI will strengthen the financial position of RCMI and
will facilitate the refinancing of Grantee's long -term debt; and
WHEREAS, SWSCC has engaged the firm of Touch Ross, certified public accountants,
to review this proposed transfer of stock ownership of RCMI and the proposed
refinancing; and
WHEREAS, Touche Ross has made an interim report to SWSCC indicating that the
proposed refinancing will lighten the debt service burden of Grantee through
a reduction of interest rates and an extension of the loan period; and
WHEREAS, Touche Ross recommend that, before final approval of such proposed
refinancing and stock ownership transfer, certain additional information be
provided and certain written commitments by made by RACC and RCA:)and
WHEREAS, RACC has indicated that it will offer to purchase the interests of
all the individual limited partners of Grantee, which offer, if accepted,
will also result in a change in ownership of Grantee; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 238.083, and Article XII of the Franchise
Ordinance, require City approval of any change in ownership of Grantee.; and
WHEREAS, Article II, Section 4, of the Franchise Ordinance provides for a
four -year extension of the Franchise if Grantee completes refinancing of its -
existing long -term indebtedness before December 31, 1987, and provides written
evidence thereof acceptable to the City; and
WHEREAS, it appears that the proposed change of ownership will not adversely
affect the Grantee's subscribers; and
WHEREAS, it appears that the proposed refinancing is likely to benefit Grantee
and may, in turn, permit Grantee to provide better service to its subscribers
than it would otherwise be able to provide.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. The City herewith gives preliminary approval to the following actions:
A. The transfer of the stock of RCMI from RUSCI to RACC;
B. The purchase of the interests of the limited partners of Grantee
by RACC:
C. The refinancing of the long -term debt of Grantee as proposed to
SWSCC and as contemplated in Article II, Section 4, of the Franchise
Ordinance.
2. Final approval of these actions will be considered by City, upon the
occurence of the following:
A. Grantee has filed with City copies of executed loan documents
evidencing that Grantee has refinanced its long term debt as contemplated
by Article II, Section 4, of the Franchise Ordinance and as represented
to SWSCC.
B. RCA has given written contractual commitment to City, satisfactory
to City, that it will provide financial assistance as necessary to Grantee,
during the term of the refinancing loan, to enable Grantee to meet its
operating expenses and debt service payments.
C. Grantee, RCMI or RACC have certified to City that the ownership of
the stock of RCMI has been transferred from RUSCI to RACC and that all
actions incident to such transfer have been duly authorized and taken.
D. RACC has executed and delivered .to City an acceptance and (with RCA)
a guarantee of RCMI's performance of the Franchise Ordinance, the Relief
5/5/86
Ordinance and the Performance Agreement between City and Grantee,
accompanied by such opinions of counsel as are required by Article XIV
of the Franchise Ordinance.
E. SWSCC has recommended to City that it give final approval of
the actions described in paragraph 1 of this Resolution.
F. The other Cities which are members of SWSCC have granted.or will
grant final approval of the actions described in paragraph 1 of this
Resolution.
3. Upon final City approval of the actions described in paragraph 1 of
this Resolution, the City will execute and deliver an agreement with Grantee
evidencing extension of the Franchise to December 31, 1999.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
(Member Richards returned to the meeting following the Cable TV hearing.)
BID AWARDED FOR IMPROVEMENT NOS. SS -373, WM -358, ST.S -179 AND C -142 (EDINA OAKS).
Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of bids for Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -273,
Watermain Improvement No. WM -358, Storm Sewer Improvement No. St.S. -179 and
Grading /Graveling Improvement No. C -142 for the Edina Oaks subdivision, as follows:
Bidder Section A Section B
G. L. Contracting, Inc. $ 8,978.97 $ 9,238.80
Encon Utilities 11,332.00 11,065.25
0. & P. Contracting 12,583.31 10,578.65
Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member K
recommended low bidder, G. L. Contracting, Inc.,
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
Section C Section D Total
$4,442.20 $7,139.54 $29,799.51
5,950.00 7,978.75 36,326.00
6,437.50 7.026.00 36,625.46
elly for award of bid to the
at $29,799.51.
BID AWARDED FOR A.C. REPLACEMENT UNITS AT CITY HALL. sir. Rosland presented
tabulation of bids for replacement of two A.C. units at City Hall showing Bryant
Air Conditioning at $6,260.00, Trane Company at $8,274.00 and Centraire at
$9,070.00. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid
to recommended low bidder, Bryant Air Conditioning, at $6,260.00.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR RETAINING WALL REPAIR. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of bids
for repair of the retaining wall on Waterman Avenue showing Bjorks Country Stone
at $8,820.00, Lauseng Stone at $13,580.00 and McFarlane's, Inc. at $15,260.00.
Bids for equipment and labor to construct the retaining wall were Bjork Country
Stone at $6,028.00 and Sunram Landscaping at $7,975.00. Motion of Member Kelly
was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid to recommended low bidder, Bjorks
Country Stone, at $8,820.00 for stone and at $6,048.00 for equipment and labor.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR METAL ROOF FOR BRIAN WIPPERMAN GUN RANGE. Mr. Rosland presented
the bid of Nordwest Builders at $9,998.00 for a metal roof for Brian Wipperman
Gun Range, advising that Nordwest is the only supplier of this roofing material
which has proved to be superior for'flat, roofs. Motion of Member Kelly was
seconded by Member Turner for award of bid to Nordwest Builders at $9,998.00.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
AWARD OF BID CONFIRMED FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS /POLICE PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE.
Mr. Rosland asked for confirmation of award of bid for public officials and police
professional liability insurance. He explained that this is an increase of approx-
imately $18,000 over a two -year period. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by
Member Turner confirming the award of bid for liability insurance at $10,597.00
with Markel Service, Inc. (National Casualty) for public officials and at
$30,073.00 with Imperial Casualty for police professional.
Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Richards
Motion carried.
(Member Kelly asked to be excused at this point in the meeting.)
HENNEPIN COUNTY TRANSFER STATION SITE IN HOPKINS DISCUSSED. Member Turner said
that she had received a telephone call from a resident regarding a hearing on
May 6, 1986, at Hennepin County regarding the Hennepin County Transfer Station
site in Hopkins and that she had informed the resident that following the Council
meeting of January 27, 1986, at which the Council had heard concerns of residents
regarding the proposed site a letter was written to the county expressing those
5/5/86
concerns. Member Turner added that she felt the action taken in January was
adequate and was on record with the county. No formal action was taken.
ON -SALE BEER LICENSE APPROVED FOR PANTRY RESTAURANT. Mr. Rosland advised that
an application for an On -Sale Beer License for the Pantry Restaurant, 5101
Arcadia Avenue, has been approved by the Police and Health Departments and is
recommended for Council approval. He noted-that there is no residential property
within 500 feet of the restaurant. Motion of member Turner was seconded by
Member Richards approving the On -Sale Beer License for the Pantry Restaurant.
Ayes: Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
(Member Kelly returned to the meeting at this point.)
MASSAGE LICENSE ORDINANCE NO. 1353 REQUIREMENTS DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland explained
that it has come to staff's attention that Sister Rosalind Gefre is presently
running a professional massage center in the Southdale Medical Center. Under
the present requirements of Ordinance No. 1353 she now must apply for a business
license instead of an individual massage license. The fees for a business
license are expensive, being $3,000 for the license and $1,500 for investigation.
The ordinance was drafted to make sure that the City could look at any fulltime
massage parlor with a strict eye. Mr. Rosland said he has met with Sister Gefre
who insists that she has a truly professional therapeutic. massage service and
has asked that therapeutic massage be considered differently than massage under
the ordinance and that she is working on getting therapeutic massage licensed
by the State of Minnesota. After some discussion as to various approaches or
alternatives, it was informally agreed that Mr. Rosland would work with Sister
Gefre on alternatives which would not waive the present ordinance requirements.
EDINA HISTORICAL SOCIETY RELOCATION STUDY DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland reported that
he will be meeting with the Edina Historical Society regarding the relocation
study which has been given to the Council and that they will bring their
recommendations and financing plans to the Council at a later date. No formal
action was taken.
BLOOMINGTON /HOMART ROAD PROJECT TO BE DISCUSSED ON JUNE 2. Mr. Hoffman said
that a letter had been received from the City of Bloomington regarding
construction of 77th Street along the common boundary west of France Avenue
which they would like to construct during 1986 and is,requesting the participa-
tion of the City of Edina. He recalled that in November of 1985 when the Homart
settlement was made it was agreed that Edina would allow Bloomington to build
the road and the right of way to be used for its construction. National Car
Rental Systems, Inc. has requested by letter that, because of traffic patterns
they belive will exist along their south property line as soon as 77th Street
is connected to France Avenue, the link road be constructed to Parklawn Avenue.
After some discussion as to holding a public hearing on the issue, it was
informally agreed to place the item on the June 2 Council Agenda for discussion
purposes and to invite National Car Rental to present their comments. No
formal action was taken.
PARK & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ACTIVITIES CALENDAR DISCUSSED. Member Turner said
she was pleased to see the elementary and secondary school calendars, together
with the First Call For Help telephone number, in the new 1986 -87 Park & Recre-
ation Activities Calendar and thanked Member Kelly for suggesting they be
included.
LEAVE OF ABSENCE FROM HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD CONSIDERED. Mayor Courtney
advised that a member of the Heritage Preservation Board has requested a three
month's leave of absence from serving on the Board. After some discussion
Mr. Rosland said he would get more information regarding the request and would
bring that back to the Council at its next meeting for action.
LAKE MINNETONKA /MINNEHAHA CREEK LEVELS NOTED. Mr. Rosland reported that water
levels in Lake Minnetonka are above the dam and that there is flooding upstream
and downstream on Minnehaha Creek. The City is offering sandbagging and have
sandbagged several residences that were in danger of flooding above the cascade
area and will do its best to protect properties along the Creek. No action was
taken.
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING RESCHEDULED FOR JUNE 9. Due to conflicts for some of
the staff, Mr. Rosland suggested that the special Council meeting scheduled for
Saturday, May 31, to discuss Strategic Planning and the Role of Council with
Surrounding Communities, be rescheduled and combined with the special meeting
on June 9 to discuss Survey results. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by
Member Turner to reschedule and combine Strategic Planning with the Survey
results on June 9 and if more time is needed that the Council again meet on
June 23 to continue the discussion.
5/5/86
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
COMPUTER ROOM FOR SERVICE.CLUBS APPROVED. Mr. Rosland advised that The Edina
Foundation is purchasing a computer for use by the various service organizations
and will finance any remodeling to provide an area for its location in City Hall.
He stated that space in the telephone room on the lower level is available and
that the key would be controlled by the Police Department. Motion of Member Kelly
was seconded by Member Turner approving locating the computer in the telephone
room in City Hall, with the understanding that all costs would be paid by The
Edina Foundation.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
PETITION FOR STORM SEWER EXTENTION REFERRED TO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. Upon
being advised that a petition has been received for
between Mait Lane and Annaway Drive, Member Kelly's
Member Turner to accept the petition and to refer it
ment for processing.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
a storm sewer extention
motion was seconded by
to the Engineering Depart-
CONNECTION CHARGES LEVIED FOR SANITARY SEWER NO. SS -264 AND WATERMAIN NO. WM -227.
Mr. Rosland recalled that the matter of levy of connection charges for sanitary
sewer and watermain for 7015 Lee Valley Circle had been continued from the meeting
of April 14, 1986 for the purpose of clarification between buyer and seller of
the lot. He advised that the charge has not been paid and recommended that it
be levied. Member Kelly then introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby authorize the assessment
of connection charges for Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -265 in the amount of
$1,119.37 and Watermain Improvement No. WM -227 in the amount of $625.81 to be
levied against Lot 2, Block 1, Svanoe Addition (PIN 408- 116- 21 -21- 0085), 7015
Lee Valley Circle, payable over a period of six (6) years, with the first
payment collectible with real estate taxes payable in 1987, and with interest on
the entire assessment at the rate of 7.5% per annum.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
DRAFT ORDINANCE TO PROHIBIT SKATEBOARDING FROM CERTAIN PUBLIC AREAS GIVEN FIRST
READING. (Public comment on this draft ordinance was taken together with the
public hearings conducted earlier in the meeting on proposed ordinance amendments.)
Mr. Rosland explained that the issue of restricting skateboarding in certain public
areas of the City was proposed by the 50th-& France Business /Professional Assn.
Board of Directors and that a draft ordinance has been prepared for Council's
consideration. Speaking in favor of the draft ordinance were: Perry Anderson,
representing the 50th and France Business & Professional Association and Maged
Daoud, 5716 Tracy Avenue. Speaking in opposition to the proposed ordinance was
Judy Henderson, 5018 Normandale Court. Commenting that she was concerned for
the safety of both skateboarders and pedestrians in commercial areas, Member Kelly
introduced the Draft Ordinance for First Reading as follows:
AN ORDINANCE TO PROHIBIT SKATEBOARDING
FROM CERTAIN PUBLIC AREAS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Skateboarding may be prohibited from certain public areas in
the City of Edina at the discretion of the City Manager. These public places
shall be prominently posted or publicly announced where the prohibition is
intended to apply. Any person who violates this ordinance may be prosecuted as
to a misdemeanor.
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage
and publication.
CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner for payment
of the following claims as per Pre -List dated 5/5/86: General Fund $122,958.09,
Art Center $2,597.86, Swimming Pool Fund $20.00, Golf Course Fund $77,842.31,
Recreation Center Fund $1,820.63, Gun Range Fund $149.67, Utility Fund
$217,519.21, Liquor Dispensary Fund $2,811.27, Construction Fund $12,061.76,
Total $437,780.80.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the
meeting adjourned at 10:45 p.m.
City Clerk
Ole' PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR BLAKE WOODS, SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS. Affidavits of A
Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file.
�•7• Mr. Hughes presented the plat of Blake Woods for preliminary approval, generally
located east of Dearborn Street and north of Belmore Lane. He advised that the
subject property, measuring 52,500 square feet in area and zoned R -1 Single Dwelling
Unit District, is composed of three existing R -1 lots fronting on the unimproved
northerly extension of Dearborn Street. The unimproved Spruce Road right -of -way
adjoins the northerly boundary of the property. The proponent requests a replatting
of the existing lots into four new lots which would range in area from 13,750 square
feet to 15,050 square feet. The four new lots would be arranged around a new
cul -de -sac on Dearborn located opposite the westerly extension of Dearborn Street
as proposed by the plat of Miller Addition. If the proposed cul -de -sacs were
constructed as shown, the northerly 100+ feet of the Dearborn right of way, as well
as the.Spruce Road right of way, could be vacated and incorporated into the proposed
lots. The proposed replatting depends on access to Miller Addition by acquisition....
of right of way across lots on the west side of Dearborn which are not owned by
the Millers. Mr. Hughes reported that the Community Development and Planning
Commission considered the subdivision at its May 30, 1984 meeting and recommended
approval with conditions: 1) subdivision dedication, 2) developer's agreement which
includes the extension of sanitary sewer and the looping of water mains, 3) vacation
of rights of way as shown on the plat, 4) submission of grading plan for the lots
prior to preliminary approval by Council and 5) a minor redesign of the proposed
cul- de-sac to •reduce its radius. In accordance with Council action taken on the
Miller Addition, staff would recommend preliminary plat approval with the understand-
ing that vacation of the rights of way as included on the plat relies on the final
action on Miller Addition. Mr. Hughes indicated that Lloyd Peterson and Paul Kingbay
were present, representing the proponents. No comment being heard, Member Bredesen
offered the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject to 1) subdivision
dedication, 2) developer's agreement, 3) vacation of rights of way as shown on the
plat, and 4) redesign of the proposed cul -de -sac:
RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL
FOR BLAKE WOODS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "Blake Woods ", platted by PKR Development Company, and pre-
sented at the regular meeting of the City Council of July 2, 1984, be and is hereby
granted preliminary plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
Subdivision No. 5 - p7 "g
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBDIVISION NAME: 6s
LAND SIZE: LAND VALUE:
(By: Date:
The developer of this subdivision has been required to
0 A. grant an easement over part of the land
ElB. dedicate % of the land
DC. donate $ as a fee in lieu of land
As a result of applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of
land dedicated)
1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
m 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
0 3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged
or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds.
D 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his-
toric value.
6.
B. Cash Required
El1. In all other instances than above.
1: 1 2.
•v
BLAKE WOODS ADDITION
145 \ \ y 60
VACATE �40' SPRUCES ROAD N
001-
-��
� \' \\ 1 4/115 011 sq. Ift.
� I
Nl 13 8 0 0-s .ft.
-
/
-
I g
\ \ - -20
� ®' �
;/a1F� Off\ N -- �� R'�' 'W o
15050 sq.ft.
950--
y
1 Ln
— 1
O
- 1375'0 sq.ft.
IS% \ \ \
� \ \ \
041 / 13 -96
x+sfn ,p I
RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL
FOR BLAKE WOODS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "BLAKE WOODS ", platted by Lloyd E. Peterson and
Patricia A. Peterson, husband and wife, and presented at the Regular Meeting
of the City Council of June 2, 1986, be and is hereby granted final plat
approval.
ADOPTED this 2nd day of June, 1986.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 2, 1986, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 3rd day of June, 1986.
City Clerk
Ve
LOCATION
MAP
=e3
NUMBER LD -86 -8
L 0 C A T10 N 6433 -6435 Vernon Avenue South
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
HELD WEDNESDAY, MAY 28, 1.986, AT 7:30 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
STAFF PRESENT:
Chairman Wi ewis, John Bailey,
Helen McC dPhil Sked, Gordon
Johnso id Runyan, Virginia Shaw,
and Paulus.
g Larsen, City Planner
ackie Hoogenakker, Secretary
THE MINUTES:
were in favor.
II. NEW BUSINESS:
The motion carried.
LD --86 -8 64336435 Vernon Avenue South
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the proponents are
requesting a party wall lot division of an existing double
bungalow. Seperate sewer and water connections are
provided.
Staff recommends approval.
Mr. Runyan moved for approval, Mr. Sked seconded the
motion. All were in favor. The motion carried.
LD-
Mr. Larsen told the Commis a proponents are
requesting a party wall lot n of an existing double
bungalow. Seperate utili ections are not provided.
Mr Larsen reco that approval be conditioned upon
a variance from quirement for seperate utility
connections f e Building Board of Appeals.
Com n Members questioned why the doub '
is wi seperate connections. s
un en construc completed and is
nents attorney regarding
ns. He added staff found no record of
P.
%
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 28, 1986
STAFF REPORT
LD -86 -8 6433 -6435 Vernon Avenue South
Refer to: Attached Survey
The proponents are requesting a party wall lot division of an
existing double bungalow. Seperate sewer and water connections are
provided.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval.
CALVIN H. H E D L U N D 7726 Morgan Avenue South
Richfield, Minnesota 55423
Land Surveyor Civil Engineer Phone : 866 -2523
serve Fit � � art" "
cate
JOB NO.
SURVEY FOR: Al Jaffe
DESCRIBED AS:
PARCEL A:
The southwesterly.50.00 feet "of the following described property:
Outlet B, and the Southwesterly 10 feet of Lot 3, Block
1, GLEASON FIFTH_ ADDITION, and Outlot B, VIKING: PILLS 4TH
ADDITION, City of Edina, Hennepin County, rfinnesota.
PAP.CEL B:
That part of the following described property:
Outlot B, and the Southwesterly 10 feet of Lot 3, Block
1, GLEASON FIFTH ADDITION, and Outlot B, VIKING' HILLS 4TH
ADDITION, City of Edina, Hennepin County, rfinnesota.
which lies northeasterly of the southwesterly 50.00 feet thereof
CERTIFICATE OF LOCATION OF BVI:DINC
1 hereby certify that on %17177
1 made a survey of the lccoticn o4 inr
building on the ubove aescribec property
ana that the location of said buiioing is
swrectly shown n ghee aZEM.'e-
VEflN�.eA .
ON
0
V�N �E
°E
6�
lZp.�5�0
JERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
I hereby certify that on 7/ 7 / 77 I surveyed the property described above and that
the above plot is a correct representation of said survey.
Yv—, '�4�
Calvin H. Hedlund, Minn. Reg. No.
I
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land:
Outlot B, and the Southwesterly 10 feet of Lot 3, Block 1, GLEASON
FIFTH ADDITION, and Outlot B, VIKING HILLS 4TH ADDITION, and
WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate
parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
Parcel A: The southwesterly 50.00 feet of the following described property:
Outlot B, and the Southwesterly 10 feet of Lot 3, Block 1, GLEASON
FIFTH ADDITION, and Outlot B, VIKING HILLS 4TH ADDITION, City of Edina,
Hennepin County, Minnesota,
and
Parcel B: That part of the following described property:
Outlot B, and the Southwesterly 10 feet of Lot 3, Block 1, GLEASON FIFTH
ADDITION, and Outlot B, VIKING HILLS 4TH ADDITION, City of Edina,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies northeasterly of the southwesterly
50.00 feet thereof.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance
Nos. 801 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land
is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and
Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to.allow said division and conveyance thereof
as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any
other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further
subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent
ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as
may be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 2nd day of June, 1986.
1
AZELTON MO.
ILUTHERAN
HUR!+*�
s OF J THE
MASTER.
'T
O
1
SOUTHDALE
SHOPPING CENTER
M
n
E2--- _: d. P a: C
PSOUTHDAL
,.
O
W. 69 TH.
• � a o
17 r7") 0 n" r\9
NUMBER B- 86 -11 KMSP -TV
L O C A T 10 N 6975 York Avenue South
ST
i
�� i
is i
�=
SEE
i
i �
REQUEST A 40 foot setback variance, a 7 stall parking
variance and a one unity quantity variance to install
an additional satellite dish antepna.
EDINA PLANNING DE AR 'ii/ ENT .
It
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS
HELD ON THURSDAY, MAY 15, 1986 AT 5:30 P.M.
EDINA CITY HALL MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson, Helen McClelland, Mike
Lewis, Jim Bentley, Phil Sked and John
Bailey
STAFF PRESENT: Phil Dommer, Associate Planner
Jackie Hoogenakker, Secretary
I. NEW BUSINESS:
B -86!11 KMSP -TV
6975 York Avenue South
Part of Tract M. R.L.S. 629
Mr. Dommer infromed the Board United Television, Inc.
requests permission to erect a third satellite dish antenna
in the northeast corner of their KMSP -TV studio on York
Avenue. The Edina Zoning Ordinance considers the site an
office and requires that 87 parking stalls be provided on
site. Currently 82 parking stalls exist. The proposed
satellite dish antenna will occupy two parking stalls and
therefore 80 stalls will be provided on site. There does
not appear to be any reasonable way to construct additional
parking at the site.
In 1982 a variance was granted to reduce the number of
required stalls from 87, to 82 when the two existing
satellite dish antennas were located in the parking lot. At
that time it was noted that typically there were 20
available parking spaces on site. It does not appear that
conditions have changed since then as during random visits
over the past week 17 parking stalls were available on an
average.
Mr. Dommer pointed out The Edina Satellite Dish Antenna
Ordinance specifies that non - residential properties are
permitted a maximum of two satellite dish antennas.
Currently 2 satellite dish antennas are located to the north
of the building. The proposed 3rd unit would be located to
the east of the existing units. This unit would handle a
relatively new frequency necessary for certain types of
programming. Other television stations in the Twin Cities
have from two to five satellite dish antennas at their
sites.
Mr. Dommer added the Edina Satellite Dish Antenna
Ordinance also specifies that dish antennas within the PC-3
district must be located 50 feet from property lines. The
proposed location is 20 feet from the east property line and
10 feet from the north property line, similar to that of the
two existing units which are legally non - conforming. the
new antenna will be smaller than the existing units and
screened in a similar fashion. There are not alternate
locations which meet the setback requirement on the ground.
Roof mounting is also not feasible due to structural and
visual considerations.
Mr. Dommer said staff recommends approval of all three
requested variances subject to the plans and statements
presented.
Random sampling indicates that a surplus of parking
exists at the site. Although technically an office in a
commercial zone, many activities occur on -site which are
substantially less intensive than office use. It is
therefore expected that a parking surplus can be expected in
the future.
Mr. Dommer explained the Edina Satellite Dish Antenna
Ordinance was passed in 1985 and is relatively untested with
respect to unique circumstances. The intent of the
ordinance is to regulate the number of satellite dish
antenna's for general commercial and industrial uses whose
principal use is not related to communication receiving.
The ordinance does not account for the special needs of
television studios which fall into a commercial zoning by
default.
The proposed location of the third antenna unit is also
most feasible. The relatively small size and screening
should minimize any visual impact.
Mr. Swartz,of KMSP was present.
Mrs. McClelland expressed concern in making a decision
on this proposal due to the new adoption of the Antenna
Ordinance. She felt this matter should be heard by the City
Council and the City Council should supply the Board of
Appeals with direction. Mr. Bailey asked Mr. Dommer to
explain his reasons for supporting the third satellite dish.
Mr. Dommer replied that a T.V. station has special needs and
Edina's Zoning Ordinance does not specifically address the
needs of communication companies such as television and
radio.
Mr. Bailey moved for denial of the variance, requesting
the proponent appeal this decision to the City Council due
to the large variance request and the newness of the Antenna
Ordinance. Mr. Sked seconded the motion. All were in
favor. The motion carried.
BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS
STAFF REPORT
MAY 15, 1986
B -86 -11 KMSP -TV
6975 York Avenue South
Part of Tract M. R.L.S. 629
Zoning: PC -3
Request: A 40 foot setback variance, a 7 stall
parking variance and a one unit quantity
variance to install an additional satellite
dish antenna.
United Television, Inc. requests permission to erect a
third satellite dish antenna in the northeast corner of
their KMSP -TV studio on York Avenue. The Edina Zoning
Ordinance considers the site an office and requires that 87
parking stalls be provided on site. Currently 82 parking
stalls exist. The proposed satellite dish antenna will
occupy two parking stalls and therefore 80 stalls will be
provided on site. There does not appear to be any
reasonable way to construct additional parking at the site.
In 1982 a variance was granted to reduce the number of
required stalls from 87, to 82 when the two existing
satellite dish antennas were located in the parking lot. At
that time it was noted that typically there were 20
available parking spaces on site. It does not appear that
conditions have changed since then as during random visits
over the past week 17 parking stalls were available on an
average.
The Edina Satellite Dish Antenna Ordinance specifies
that non - residential properties are permitted a maximum of
two satellite dish antennas. Currently 2 satellite dish
antennas are located to the north of the building. The
proposed 3rd unit would be located to the east of the
existing units. This unit would handle a relatively new
frequency necessary for certain types of programming. Other
television stations in the Twin Cities have from I to 5
satellite dish antennas at their sites.
The Edina Satellite Dish Antenna Ordinance also
specifies that dish antennas within the PC -3 district must
be located 50 feet from property lines. The proposed
location is 20 feet from the east property line and 10 feet
from the north property line, similar to that of the two
existing units which are legally non - conforming. The new
antenna will be smaller than the existing units and screened
in a similar fashion. There are not alternate locations
which meet the setback requirement on the ground. Roof
mounting is also not feasible due to structural and visual
considerations.
Summary
1. Two satellite dish antenna units currently occupy
Parking stalls and are legally non - conforming with
respect to setbacks.
2. There exists a surplus of available parking at the
site.
3, Other television stations require from I to 5
satellite dish units on site.
4. The proposed location will be screened.
5. Alternative locations are not feasible.
Recommendation:
The staff recommends approval of all three requested
variances subject to the plans and statements presented.
Random sampling indicates that a surplus of parking
exists at the site. Although technically an office in a
commercial zone, many activities occur on -site which are
substantially less intensive than office use. It is
therefore expected that a parking surplus can be expected in
the future.
The Edina Satellite Dish Antenna Ordinance was passed
in 1985 and is relatively untested with respect to unique
circumstances. The intent of the ordinance is to regulate
the number of satellite dish antenna's for general
commercial and industrial uses whose principal use is not
related to communication receiving. The ordinance does not
account for the special needs of television studios which
fall into a commercial zoning by default.
The proposed location of the third antenna unit is also
most feasible. The relatively small size and screening
should minimize any visual impact.
PROPOSED
UNIT
Vt
• � II 1:0.0 . -_W —G' . -_ '� :_' - -_ r__ -_,.� ! .� -�� .� —. >.l.u, •r w../ 1•'fni.L 1
,x, - i ' _ EXISTING
cy
1 I�t. ..�. 1 c'...� •� / —>•- UNITS
•y \ 1 �; /: nrJ.7tCAP :1 1 PA RKINOI I I -
I II 1� U 3TALLH I
_•� i i�- -1 1 j / r
ua-- --
.1 /
i
oI .� I II% 1 C �1 I,• � � I� i
I• � ► r1r•. Ri.er t>r.� �
1 7y
to
/ 01 \
C—' ` r:.r� a �':Tt!'�:•-.'
1 i IIi
ne•' 1 `al �..,. F7N. rA&r �pL. CL. a ±ss.� % / 1 % •��l�71 �' -
fT
1
:
1
� I .t I IA t •� I 1 1 1 �; .
Z ' � •o� ;\ m I I 1 � I' j
0 1 I
I
I � I
13
Y 11.1 1 I 1
I I 077
Q1 z 3 — +• —,
D '�: I Y 1• � .I O t 1 11 �
• I �. 4 I -�/ —6 I,
CL
,e.Car_ ' • II it
.
P r1A KII10 17 1 STALLS
1
t7e•T.:,�•rf- � i.1 r l �� �Y' i P1: v .�,sM
e - •� \t� ':c« � � \� ..uM .. rla -`� E IMF - -•� —..Ij
be
,PAN IN ca: ' 1 1 aTALtH
/ I 1 1 ells'•— . ", to —��' _ al./ —_.._ _�� --�': '—��` I I w
1., / 1 ♦ .... _ n° eel
vLe,e•. `�� � M
/
-'- 1 -2 —J -- -- "- M/ECPT-- ..7UT"— STRE=ET -= - -- - -- /
• 4
K M S P
KMSP Television
6975 York Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55435
612.926.9999
May 16, 1986
Mr. Craig Larsen
City Planner
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55435
Dear Craig:
Thank you for your time this morning on the telephone. This is to
confirm our conversation that KMSP is appealing the decision made last
night regarding the addition of a satellite dish. The reason for this
appeal is that it is imperative for KMSP to have this satellite dish to
continue to offer news service to our community. Without this we will
not only make KMSP noncompetitive with other TV stations, but will do a
disservice to our citizens. It is my understanding that KMSP will be
allowed to appeal in front of the council on June 2.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely yours,
Stuart Z. Swartz
Vice President an
General Manager
SZS /jmd
A United
Television Inc.
Station
so REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
-ROM: Francis J. Hoffman, City Engineer
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: May 29, 1986
�n
Material Description (General Specifications):
.Contract #86 -4 (Eng) - Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer & Grading &
Graveling - Improvement No.'s.SS -375, WM -360, ST.S. -180-& C -144
at Dearborn Court
Quotations /Bids:
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. See attached Bid Tabulation
2.
Department Recommendation:
Hydrocon, Inc. $50,338.90
(Funded thru Special Assessment)
AzEngineering Department
t.
Sim atu a Department.
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is ✓ is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
ohn Wallin, Finance Director
City Manager's Endorsement:
y 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
h Rosland, C
Manager
BID TABULATION
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
CONTRACT #86 -4 (ENG)
SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER AND GRADING AND GRAVELING
IMPROVEMENT NO.'S SS -375, WM -360, ST.S. -180
AND C -144
DEARBORN COURT
BID OPENING - THURSDAY, MAY 29, 1986
11.00 A.M.
BIDDER
SECTION A
SECTION B
SECTION C
SECTION D
GRAND TOTAL
Hydrocon, Inc.
$16,498.30
$9,879.00
$14,412.00
$9,549.60
$50,338.90
G. L. Contracting, Inc.
$18,731.24
$11,403.80
$14,924.71
10,898.50
$55,958.25
0. & P. Contracting
$17,635.68
$10,141.65
$15,056.61
13,935.00
$56,768.94
Brown & Cris, Inc.
$23,660.32
$12,366.00
$17,733.90
10,358.60
$64,118.82
.C.G., Inc.
$24,845.00 .$13,201.00
$15,832.00
12,923.60
$66,801.60
Ro -So Contracting
$22,166.00
$12,575.00
$199132.00
149037.00
$67,910.00
Q.R.S. Construction, Inc.
$26,086.80
$189221.00
$17,874.00
10,237.00
$72,418.80
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE:
$21,009.05
$12,759.04
$18,670.06
$10,341.80
$629779.95
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE'
TO: Mayor and City Council
'ROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE of ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: May 28, 1986
Material Description (General Specifications):
One asphalt roller with trade -in of old roller
Quotations /Bids:
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Road Machinery & Supply (Beuthling) $11,423.00
2. Rufferidge Johnson (Rosco) $11,670.00
Road Machinery & Supply (Dynapac) $21,500.00
Department Recommendation:
Road Machinery & Supply
(Funded through equipment replacement budget)
$11,423.00
Public Works - Street
Si ecr e Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
John Wallin, Finance Director
City Manager's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
CITY of �Q
EDINA
4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424
612 - 927 -8861
May 29, 1986
Mayor C. Wayne Courtney and Members of the Edina City Council
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Mayor Courtney and Council Members:
The Human Relations Commission has developed a framework for reviewing
requests that the City fund human service programs in the community.
This process will provide an improved method for handling these funding
requests and enable the Council's budgeting discussion on these issues
to move ahead quickly.
To implement this review process, we propose using the attached guide-
lines to assure we receive consistent information from each organization
requesting support from the City. The Commission would appreciate your
comments and approval to distribute these guidelines to human service
organizations that ask the City to support their program(s).
Additionally, the Commission will carefully evaluate each such request
for funding and also proposes to brief the Council on each proposal
during the up- coming budgeting meetings.
I will attend the June 2 Council Meeting to expand on the proposed process
and to answer your questions.
Geoffre% S. Workinger
Chair, Human Relations Commission
GSW /sw
Enclosure
cc: Human Relations Commission Members
1
(Subject to comment and approval by the City Council)
(Approved by the Human Relations Commission on May 20, 1986)
GUIDELINES FOR PREPARING HUMAN SERVICE PROGRAM FUNDING REQUESTS
(WRITTEN RESPONSES WILL CONSTITUTE PROPOSALS)
--------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
1. What community need do you propose to serve?
a. Describe in detail the need you propose to serve.
b. Describe the characteristics of the community's
population segment who have this need.
C. Describe the extent of the unmet need and how you
collaborate this.
2. What services do you propose to provide to meet this need?
a. Describe your program and the methods and
techniques you propose to use.
3. What alternative programs are there to meet this need?
a. Are the proposed or similar services presently
available in Edina? In the South Hennepin area?
b. Who else is providing them?
4. What resouces do you intend to use to meet this need?
a. Staffing equivalents (include both paid and
volunteer staff).
b. Service locations
C. Normal service hours; after hours service
d. What other public and private agencies do you
propose to work with? And how do you propose to word;
with them?
5. What experience do you have providing these services?
a. What success do you expect?
b. Explain why your expected success is attainable.
C. Describe any unique obstacles or problems that must
be solved before you can effectively deliver the
proposed services?
d. Provide a list of other public or private
organizations for whom you are currently providing the
proposed services, including their principal contacts,
addresses and phone numbers.
e. What is the experience of the principals who will
direct and deliver the proposed services in Edina?
f. How do you propose to measure and report the
success of your proposed services in Edina?
k-
b. How do you propose to cover your expenses for the proposed
services?
a. What other organizations in Edina are providing or
will likely provide support for the proposed services?
b. How much support is each of these organizations
providing to the proposed program during the current
year?
C. How do you structure your fees to the people using
your program?
d. What percent of your projected expenses would their
fee payments cover?
e. Provide your budget of projected income and
expenses for the first 12 months of the proposed
program in Edina showing the Edina component separately
from the whole program.
7. Explain why the City should fund the services you propose.
8. General background on your organization
a. Briefly describe the scope of the services
presently provided by your entire organization; your
current staffing levels (in full time equivalents)
b. Provide financial statements describing your
projected expenses and revenues for your current fiscal
year and your actual expenses and revenues for the
prior year.
C. How long has your organization been providing these
services?
d. What are your major accomplishments in the last two
years?
e. Explain your organization's major objectives for
the current year and its long range plan.
f. Include (20> brochures currently used to inform the
public about your proposed services.
g. Provide the names and phone numbers of you Board of
Directors and indicate the year each first served on
the Board.
h. If your organization is a non- profit, provide a
copy of the IFS letter qualifying your organization as
a non - profit and your latest Form 990.
i. If your organization is for profit, provide the
names and addresses of persons who have a beneficial
interest of S% or more in your organization.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Courtney and
Council Members
FROM: Leslie Turner/ Fran Hoffman
SUBJECT: 1 1 -494 Corridor Study Update
DATE: May 29, 1986
The second meeting of the I -494 Project Management Team was held
Wednesday, May 28th. As promised at our last City Council meeting, we
have summarized the content of the meeting and will be happy to answer
your questions on Monday night.
1. Mayor Gary Peterson, Eden Prairie, was elected Chairman of the
Project Management Team.
2. The Project Management Team agreed with its consultant
Selection Committee and unanimously recommended to the Metropolitan
Council that BRW, Inc. be hired as consultant for the project. Only
two bids were received: Barton- Aschman Associates and BRW, Inc.
"BRW, Inc. was selected on the basis of their experience in corridor
studies, their broader mix of staff to cover all aspects of the study and
their commitment to complete the study on time within the budget. BRW's
budget includes a 10% contingency to cever tasks not forseen at the start
of the study. BRW also showed greater awareness of the political
implications of the study, especially the land use implications, and
proposed a study process which allows for several iterations to find the
right combination of land use and transportation facilities."
3. We discussed the public involvement process, which will include
press releases written by the Metropolitan Council's Public Information
office distributed to local newspapers and to us for distribution to
interested groups, workshop meetings for interested people in the corridor,
public hearings, etc. Cities will play an important role in keeping their
constituencies informed.
4. The next meeting, June 25th, will include a bus tour of the
corridor.
5. Craig Larson has been appointed our alternate to the Team.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager DATE: May 30, 1986
FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Wine License Investigation Alternatives
At the Council meeting of May 19th, 1986, there did not seem to be support
for a financial background investigation of wine license applicants and it
appeared that an affidavit review process would be a sufficient standard to
determine if issuance of a license is in the public interest.
Therefore, the below process is suggested for discussion:
- Applicants should submit the modified Edina application forms
that are not expanded beyond the scope of the State of
Minnesota "Application for City On -Sale Wine License."
- Applicants should submit City - furnished affidavits reflecting
compliance with laws of the State of Minnesota governing the
taxation and sale of intoxicating liquor, the rules and..
regulations promulgated by the Liquor Control Commissioner
and ordinances of the City of Edina.
- Applicants should submit a City - provided affidavit from a
Certified Public Accountant (CPA) that reflects the fact that
a review or audit has been conducted within the 12 -month
period prior to the application.
A second part to this process could be included if certain facts deem it
necessary. That second part would reserve the right of the Council to
order an expanded investigation if, during the application process,
irregularities, inconsistencies, law violations or other information not
supportive to the issuance of a license is discovered. This action could
be the result of police or citizen input and would allow the Council to
address each applicant on an individual basis
I'm sure this alternative will be very expedient for the applicants.
At the Council meeting I will distribute the revised application forms and
the necessary inclusions for the affidavit process.
r
CRAIG G. SWANSON
CHIEF OF POLICE
CGS:nah
510 NORTH CENTRAL LIFE TOWER
445 MINNESOTA STREET
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
(912)227 -8017
P. O. Box 848
340 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55903
(507) 288 -3158
DORSEY & WHITNEY
A Partnership Including Professional Corporations
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
(612) 340 -2600
TELEX 29 -0605
TELECOPIER : (612) 340 -2868
315 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING THOMAS S. ERICKSON, P. A.
WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391
(612)475 -0373 (612) 340-2659
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022 May 30, 19 8 6
(212),415-9200
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland
City Manager
City of Edina
4801 West 50 Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Re: Wine Licensing and Procedure
Dear Mr. Rosland:
201 DAVIDSON BUILDING
B THIRD STREET NORTH
GREAT FALLS, MONTANA 59401
(406)727 -3632
304 TRANSWESTERN PLAZA III
550 NORTH 31- STREET
P. O. BOX 1179
BILLINGS, MONTANA 59103
(406) 282 -3800
30 RUE LA SOETIE
75008 PARIS, FRANCE
011 331 552 32 50
On April 21, 1986 Mr. Craig Swanson wrote to
me asking a number of questions concerning the serving
of wine and other questions related to the sale of wine
under City Ordinance No. 902. Those questions arose out
of a meeting that Mr. Swanson had with all of the wine
licensees in Edina. Those questions and my answers to
them are as follows:
1. Question: Can a wine licensee serve wine
to a person ordering only appetizer items from a menu
rather than an entree or sandwich as specified in Ordinance
No. 902, Sec. 1 and Sec. 40(a)? Conceivably a person,
either by choice or time factors, may want the variety,
small portion or relative speed of appetizers. On the
other hand, the appetizer may become the minimal food
purchase qualifying the customer for the service of wine.
Answer:
Sec. 40(a) of the ordinance states that "no
person shall be sold, served or consume wine
who does not order a meal to be consumed with
the wine." Sec. 1 of the ordinance defines
' Imeal" to mean "entrees and sandwiches offered
on a restaurant menu." Based on the cited ordinance
section, a person who orders only an appetizer
cannot be served wine. Minnesota Statutes,
Section 340A.404, Subd. 5, states only that
a wine license permits the sale of wine "for
consumption with the sale of food." Therefore,
the statute would allow service of wine with
only an appetizer, but the ordinance does not.
DORSEY & WHITNEY
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland
May 30, 1986
Page 2
2. Question: Can a wine licensee serve wine
to a customer during the period of time prior to the placing
of the food order? Current restaurant custom would call
for the service of an alcoholic beverage during the period
of menu selection. The ordinance seems to indicate a
classic viewpoint of wine service strictly with the meal..
However, all customers may not share this etiquette.
A person being served in this manner may not order a complete
meal as in the previous question or may excuse himself
or herself from ordering any food.
Answer:
Sec. 40(a) of the ordinance states that "no
person shall be sold, served or consume wine
who does not order a meal to be consumed with
the wine." Based on the quoted ordinance section,
a person may order a meal and then be served
wine. However, as written, the ordinance would
not allow wine to be served prior to the time
the meal is ordered. Also, as stated in 1 above,
Minnesota Statutes require that the wine be
sold "for consumption with the sale of food."
The statute could, in my opinion, be read to
allow the wine sales prior to the placing of
the food order so long as wine was sold for
consumption with food, which, presumably, could
be crackers or bread then on the table, or a
meal later to be served. The ordinance and
the state statutes do not seem to prohibit the
circumstance where, for example, a meal is ordered
and wine is ordered with the intent to be consumed
with the food, and thereafter the meal order
is cancelled.
3. Question: Does the manager of a wine licensed
establishment need be physically on the premise at all
times? The possibility could arise where a manager is
called to a meeting in another part of the shopping center
or due to an emergency is outside the establishment for
a short time. If the manager is not present, must the
licensed premise close for business or merely cease wine
sale?
Answer:
Sec. 39(a)6) states that a licensed manager
must be "on the licensed premises" at all time
DORSEY & WHITNEY
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland
May 30,1986
Page 3
during which the licensed premises are open
for business." The strict language of the quoted
ordinance section requires that the licensed
premises close during such time as the manager
is not physically present on the premises.
4. Question: Can a wine licensee serve samples
of wine (approx. 1 ounce), free of charge, for promotional
purposes? A reasonably conceived -of market strategy might
be to serve samples of food or samples of wine to customers
as they wait in line for seating. In this possible case,
the customers are within the establishment with the apparent
intent to have a meal. The "samples" are not intended
to draw the customer in, but only help him or her make
a selection.
Answer:
Sec. 40(a) of the ordinance provides that "no
person shall be sold, served or consume wine
who does not order a meal to be consumed with
the wine." That ordinance language prohibits
the service-of wine samples to persons standing
in line who have not ordered food to be consumed
with the wine. The statute above cited only
prohibits "sale" of wine without the sale of
food. Therefore, under the state statute, such
samples could be served if they were not "sold ".
5. Can an 18- year -old waiter /waitress serve
wine even though the ordinance precludes them from possessing
such a beverage? Current Statutes are somewhat vague.
A check with the Liquor Control Commission revealed that
their interpretation is contrary to our ordinance. Further-
more, they have so informed one of our licensees that
18- year -olds are eligible for serving and any City ordinance
will be superseded. Lastly, Chapter 330 of the 1986
Legislature, effective September 1, 1986, will clarify
the point and prohibit cities from being more restrictive.
Answer:
I agree that the statutes are confusing. However,
the answer appears to be that the ordinance
prohibits persons under 19 years of age, and
the state statute prohibits persons under 18
years of age, from being employed on the licensed
premises, except as musicians, buspersons,
dishwashers, waiters and waitresses, but no
person under 19 by the ordinance, and 18 by
DORSEY & WHITNEY
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland
May 30, 1986
Page 4
statute, may serve or sell wine. In specific
answer, then, to the question, an 18 year old
waiter or waitress may not serve wine because
of the ordinance restrictions, but state statute
would allow an 18 year old to serve wine. As
I read the statute, the ordinance is not superseded
until September 1, 1986.
The above referred statutory-changes make two
amendments to our ordinance necessary, one being to change
the state established legal drinking age to 21 (effective
September 1, 1986) and the other being to change Sec. 40(e)
(again effective not later than September 1, 1986) to
provide that 18, 19 and 20 year olds may work in the licensed
premises, including the service of.wine. This latter
amendment can be made effective now, but must be effective
by September 1, 1986.
It is my understanding that you will give this
letter to the City Council for its review and decision
on whether any amendments should be made to the ordinance.
Very truly yours,
Thomas S. Erickson
TSE:jd
enclosure
cc: Craig G. Swanson,
Chief of Police
r`
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth E. Rosland DATE: May 29, 1986
FROM: Craig G. Swanson
SUBJECT: On -Sale Wine License Renewals
The on -sale wine license renewal applications of the below three
establishments have been investigated in accordance with applicable
Statutes and ordinances:
Empress Restaurant
3335 Hazelton Rd.
Edina, MN 55435
Szechuan Star Restaurant
3655 Hazelton Rd.
Edina, MN 55435
Good Earth Restaurant
3460 W. 70th St.
Edina, MN 55435
The findings of these investigations do not reveal information that is
contrary to the public interest for the purpose of licensing.
Therefore, I recommend the Council move to approve the application and
inssuance of an on -sale wine license for the establishment conditioned upon
approval by the State of Minnesota and instruct the City Clerk to forward
the required documents to the State of Minnesota for their approval.
CRAIG G SWANSON
CHIEF OF POLICE
CGS:nah
T
l
MEMORANDUM
TO: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER
FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CITY CLERK ___'MJ�
SUBJECT: CLUB ON -SALE LIQUOR AND SUNDAY LICENSE RENEWALS
DATE: MAY 30, 1986
Applications have been received for renewal of Club On -Sale Liquor and
Sunday licenses from the Edina Country Club and Interlachen Country Club,
for the period of July 1, 1986 to July 1, 1987.
The applications have been reviewed and investigated by the Police Department
and approved. Renewal of these licenses by the Council is recommended
conditioned upon approval by the State Liquor Control.
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 29, 1986
-F vQ K
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: David A. Velde, City Sanitarian
SUBJECT: Food Establishment License Revocation: Gim Loong Chow Mein
Restaurant
On May 20, 1986, the owner of Gim Loong Chow Mein Restaurant, 4948
France Avenue South was notified that the Health Department will be
requesting revocation of his Food Establishment License at the June
2, 1986 City Council Meeting. Documents supporting this action are
enclosed herewith.
I firmly believe the continued operation of Gim Loong Chow Mein
Restaurant under the present ownership presents a threat and danger
to those members of the public who choose to purchase and consume
food prepared in this establishment.
Therefore, I request the Edina City Council consider revocation
of the Food Establishment License for Gim Loong Chow Mein based
upon the numerous public health violations and the reluctance of
the owner to adopt and implement safe food handling procedures for
this restaurant. -
The City of Edina Department of Health
Staff Report
June 2, 1986
Subject: Gim Loong Chow Mein
4948 France Avenue
The Gim Loong restaurant has experienced numerous health
violations since the present owners began operating the
establishment in the spring of 1984. This Department has
tried to work with the owners to improve their food handling
procedures, however, the efforts have been unsuccessful.
This Department required that a representative from the
establishment attend the Quality Assurance Course which is
sponsored by Hennepin County. This course instructs
foodservice personnel on proper foodhandling procedures,
sanitizing techniques, and foodborne illness prevention.
The person who attended the class did not pass the course.
(See attached document A).
In July 1985 we gave the establishment a Quality Assurance
handbook written in chinese. We encouraged them to read the
book, implement the recommendations set forth in the book
and instruct the employees in the proper food handling
procedures.
The Quality Assurance handbook was not thoroughly read by
the owners and the information was not passed on to the
employees. The owners do not understand their
responsibility for protecting the publics health.
According to the inspection reports, the owners have
demonstrated that they can improve their procedures.
However, they do not maintain or follow the correct
procedures between inspection periods. After the
inspections have been conducted, the owners and employees
revert to their previous foodhandling practices ignoring
what the health department has taught them. Listed below
are the initial and compliance inspection dates with the
corresponding inspection scores.
Intial Inspections Compliance Inspections
June 13, 1984 64
January 8, 1985 77
August 1, 1985 75
February 18, 1986 75
June 27, 1984 89
January 22, 1985 89
August 15, 1985 66
August 29, 1985 71
March 12, 1986 84
i [ It
May 14, 1986 64
These inspection scores are based on a point system where
the highest score is 100. A passing score is considered 70
or above.
As you can see, the inspection scores do improve between the
intial inspection and the compliance inspection but
regresses again before the next inital inspection. The
scores, however, do not reflect the seriousness of the
public health hazards in the establishment.
Listed below is a description of significant food handling
violations and the dates of occurance:
Food Protection
They were using a wood board
cutting board. The board was
for cutting celery and other
Food was stored on the floor
Containers of food stored on
contamination from moisture
1984 and January 8, 1985.
(or piece of paneling) as a
placed on the floor and used
vegetables. June 13, 1984.
in the walkin cooler.
the floor are subject to
and dirty mop water. June 13 &27,
Food was not covered during storage in the walkin cooler.
Food that is left uncovered is exposed to contamination from
spillage or drippings from food stored above the food, or
from bacteria in the air from raw meats. June 13, 1985,
January 8,1985, August 1, 1985, August 15, 1985, August 29,
1985 and May 14, 1986.
Employees were observed mixing food items with their hands.
They were instructed to use utensils whenever possible or to
use plastic gloves. August 1, 1985, August 15, 1985, August
29, 1985.
Employees were using take-out food containers to measure
portions of raw meats, etc. Then after cooking the product
the cooked food was placed into the same container. This
procedure causes a direct cross - contamination of the cooked
product and can lead to a foodborne illness. August 29, 1985
and May 14, 1986.
An employee placed potentially hazardous fried food in a
dirty cardboard box and stored the food at room temperature.
This procedure causes contamination to the cooked food and
allows the product to incubate at room temperature. May 14,
1985.
Temperature Violations
Chow mein and egg foo yung were stored at room temperature.
June 13, 1984, February 18, 1986 and May 14, 1986.
Cooked rice was not properly cooled. Cooked rice must be
cooled in shallow containers to 40 degrees Fahrenheit within
4 hours after cooking. The rice will grow bacteria such as
Bacillus cereus (a bacteria which can cause foodborne
illness). when the rice is not handled properly. The Edina
City laboratory was able to recover Bacillus cereus from
samples of cooked rice and chicken fried rice which were
collected on June 27, 1985. The samples were collected in
response to 7 foodborne illness complaints. (See attached
document B). January 8, 1985, January 22, 1985, August 29,
1985, February 18, 1986, and March 12, 1986.
Product in the steamtable registered less than 150 degrees
Fahrenheit. 150 degrees Fahrenheit is the minimum hot
holding temperature. This temperature is necessary to
prevent bacteria from multipling to numbers that may cause
foodborne illnesses. March 12, 1986.
Personal Hygiene
Employees were not wearing hair restraints. June 13,
1984,and August 1, 1985.
Employees did not wash their hands prior to handling food.
June 13, 1984 and August 29, 1985.
Employees were using the three compartment sink for washing
their hands. This procedure constitutes poor hygiene
practices and a cross - contamination to the three compartment
sink which is used for sanitizing food handling utensils.
January 8, 1986 and May 14, 1986.
Employees were using the same cloth hand towel for wiping
their hands. They can use either paper towels ( which were
available) or a rotating cloth towel. When each employee
uses the same cloth hand towel bacteria can be transfered
from one employee to another. January 8, 1986 and May 14,
1986.
The three compartment sink was being used to prepare food
items. This procedure is a direct cross - contamination to
food items from dirty equipment and utensils and chemicals
used in the sink. August 1, 1985, August 15, 1985, and
August 29, 1985.
Employees were observed eating and drinking while preparing
food items. August 29, 1985.
Employees were observed smoking while preparing food items.
February It, 1985 and July 10, 1985. A court citation was
issued for the smoking violation on July 10, 1985.
Sanitizing Procedures
A chemical sanitizes or a hot water sanitizing solution was
not being used in the three compartment sink. All equipment
and utensils must be washed and sanitized to decrease the
number of bacteria on food handling equipment. June 13,
1984, January 8, 1985, February 18, 1986 and May 14, 1986.
Employees did not know the proper procedure for washing and
sanitzing the food handling equipment and utensils in the
three compartment sink. These items must be washed with
soap and water in the first compartment, rinsed with clean,
clear water in the second compartment and sanitized with a
chemical solution or hot water in the third compartment.
June 27, 1984 and January 22, 1985.
Management had been instructed to obtain test papers to
measure the strength of the sanitizing solution in the three
compartment sink. This procedure is necessary to insure
that the proper concentration of the chemical is being used.
August 1, 1985, August 15, 1985 and August 29, 1985, and May
14, 1986.
Rodents
There was evidence of mice. June 13, 1984.
Miscellaneous
There was no hot water at the hand washing sink in the
basement toilet room. June 13, 1984 and June 27, 1984.
The hand sink in the kitchen was blocked and inaccessible
due to a mop bucket and mops. May 14, 1986.
On October 18, 1985, a spot inspection was conducted of the
establishment at 11:00 a.m. It was brought to this
Departments attention that home delivery was occuring from
this establishment. The establishment had not applied for
nor obtained a perishable food vehicle license nor had they
discussed the home delivery with us. Potentially hazardous
food items were being transported without proper temperature
protection. Other violations that were noted are as follows:
Cooked rice was stored at room temperature.
There was no sanitizes in the three compartment sink.
The employees were preparing food without hair restraints or
aprons.
Reusing tin foil disposable containers.
An employee dropped a utensil on the floor and picked it up
and used it without washing or sanitizing it.
In the afternoon on October 18, 1985, Jeff Brills came to
the office. We explained the problems which were associated
with the home delivery program and also the food handling
problems at the food establishment. Mr. Brills was
interested in complying with the regulations of the health
department and to help the owners correct the problems in
the establishment.
On October 21, 1985, this Department spoke with the owner of
the Gim Loong Chow Mein and Wayne Chu who acted as an
interpreter. We told them that they had one month to bring
the establishment into compliance with health regulations.
If the owners were unsuccessful in complying with health
regulations in the one month period, this Department was
prepared to begin license revocation procedures.
Mr. Brills, who was in charge of the home delivery program
took it upon himself to seek a professional foodservice
consultant. He contacted Dr. O.P. Snyder with the
Hospitality Institute of Technology and Management. Dr.
Snyder discussed the problems he noted within the
establishment and suggested changes which should be
implemented. ( See document c).
On October 25, 1985 the establishment was inspected for the
purpose of licensing Jeff Brills delivery vehicle and to
insure that the establishment was implementing proper
foodhandling procedures and sanitizing techniques. Mr.
Brills had purchased as required a transport box which could
be plugged into a car cigarette lighter to keep the food hot
during transportation.
Ms. Rose -Lee who speaks english joined the establishment to
help the owners understand the health department
regulations. This Department spoke with Ms Lee on November
7, 1985 and discussed the problems of the estblishment. On
November 20, 1985 the establishment was reviewed and this
Department found that the owners and employees were
operating in an acceptable manner.
The establishment was not inspected again until February
1986, at which time it was noted that the employees had
reverted to previous foodhandling practices and the
employees displayed little regard for proper sanitation
practices.
During an inspection which was conducted on May 14, 1986, it
was noted that Mr. Brills was no longer with the
establishment. He was the only person associated with the
establishment who demonstrated any knowledge of proper
foodhandling procedures and sanitizing techniques.
It is evident that without outside help the owner is in
capable of instituting the necessary actions which would
insure that food prepared from this establishment would be
safe for human consumption.
aum Q(\'* A .
CLASS LIST
FOOD PRODUCTION CLINIC
October 16, 17, 1984
Crystal
Name
Establishment
City
Certified
Don Bruner
Copper Stein
Tonka Bay
no show
Karin Rossbach
University Child Care
I.9inneapolis
No
Todd Shelton
Byerly's
Minnetonka
Yes
Joe Hyland
Mtka.Country Club
Shorewood
cancelled
Peter Matheson
Camp Kingswood
Minnetrista
cancelled
Dale Blowers
Mai Tai
Excelsior
no show
Bill Berg
Mai Tai
Excelsior
no show
Lorraine Lundin
Redeemer Residence
Hinneapolis
Yes
Lynda Berg
Redeemer Residence
Minneapolis
Yes
Kenneth Vice
Ebenezer Calvary Coop
Golden Valley
Yes
Dale Warrick
C.tl.Hamburger Grill
Brooklyn Park
no show
Kent Masterson
H.C.Adult Corrections
Plymouth
no show
Frank Sass
H.C.Adult Corrections
Plymouth
no show
Jack Hines
Pot Luck
Hassan
cancelled
Carol Hines
Pot Luck
Hassan
Yes
Va Liu
Gim Loong Chow Mein
Edina
No
Sue Johnson
Robb's Super Valu Deli
St.Louis Park
Yes
Dave Turner
Benjamin's
Edina
Yes
Tom Robeson
Benjamin's
Edina
Yes
Ken Maahs
Le Bistro
Edina
No
Kenneth Einspahr
Perkins
Edina
Yes
Mary Ann Lewis
Vladimir's Deli
Excelsior
no show
Anna Ibs
Jones Harrison Home
Minneapolis
Yes
Karen Christopherson
Jones Harrison Home
Minneapolis
Yes
Rick Schultze
MN Valley Club
Bloomington
Yes
Don Hiller.
MN' Valley Club
Bloomington.
Yes
Pat Meyer
Holiday Plus
Plymouth
Yes
Frank Livingston
Woolley's
Bloomington
Yes
Carol Beck
Gold Star Foods
Minneapolis
Yes
'
A.
MUOIT• , `� \ • \ ej�v
OFeeAp1�AA
` F®iNA
01 WEST 50TH STREET. EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
612 - 927 -8861
July 11, 1985
Gim Loong Chow Mein
4948 France Avenue South
Edina, Minnesota 55410
Dear Sirs:
3+
On June 26, 1985 this Department received 7 (seven) foodborne illness
complaints associated with your establishment. All seven people consumed
Chicken Fried Rice at 12:00 p.m. on June 26, 1985 and became ill approxi-
mately two hours later. In response to the complaints the following food
samples were taken on June 27, 1985 for laboratory analysis:
SPC Coliform Fecal Strep Staph Bacillus cereus
Chicken 1,400,000 overgrown overgrown 70,000 - - - --
Cooked
Rice 12, 000, 000 10 190 -1000 present in large Vs
Chicken
Fried
Rice 120,000 -10 -10 -1000 present in large Ps
The presence of the organism Bacillus cereus in the chicken fried rice is the
most probable cause of the seven foodborne illness complaints. Bacillus
cereus has been typically associated with rice products such as fried rice.
The organism can form .a toxin' in' the rice which is not destroyed by stir -
frying. The Bacillus 'cereus organism probably grew in the cooked rice
while-it was in the waikin cooler. It is very important to cool cooked rice
quickly using shallow containers no more than 2 inches deep so that the pro-
duct will reach 40OF within four hours. The cooked rice was found in a
stainless steel bowl; since the bowl is 'concaved and rice is piled into it in-
creasing the depth of the product, the internal portion of the cooked rice
most likely did not cool quickly enough.
Shallow pans must be obtained for cooling the rice quickly and properly.
We will be retesting the product at a later date.
Sincerely,
Melissa h1clntyre
Edina Health Department
MM /jh
INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & MANAGEMENT T 1
830 Transfer Road, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55114 (612) 646 -7077
May 22, 1986
Ms. Colleen Paulus
Sanitarian
Edina City Hall
Edina, MN
Dear Ms. Paulus:
At your request, let me furnish you with information concerning my visit
with Mr. Jeff Brills at Gim Loongs, 4948 France Avenue South, Minneapolis.
Approximately four months ago I scheduled an appointment and met with Mr.
Brills at the Gim Loong Take -Out foodservice operation. Mr. Brills was a
form of subcontractor in the restaurant doing home del iveries of their
food. Mr. Bri I I s asked many Intel I agent, concerned questions regarding
Foodborne Illness Prevention and good operating practices. There was
another young American with him who was also part of the home del ivery
service.
After we had talked about good personal hygiene, proper cooking and cooling
of food, use of MSG, food storage, etc., I went to the kitchen to observe
kitchen operations. Two oriental cooks had begun food preparation. This
was approximately 10:00 a.m.
It was evident tome from the conversation that the Orientals had little or
no understanding of food safety, and probably because of your, urging were
I I sten i ng to the recommendation of Mr. Bri I Is.
Mr. Brills had spent a great deal of his personal time cleaning and
painting the facility to meet your sanitary standards.
It was my opinion as I I eft, that if Mr. Bri I I s was not there to control
operations, there would be I ittl a or no assurance of Food Safety and Sani-
tation. The health risk to the customer would be quite high. It was
apparent there was very I ittl e, if any, understanding on the part of the
owners as to what constituted safe food handling procedures.
If you woul d I ike additional detai I s on my observations on this faci I ity,
please contact me.
Sincerely,(
0. P. Snyder, Jr., Ph. D.
Director
OPS/ dr e
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Courtney & City Council Members
FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager /-. /1' P-1 - ,
SUBJECT: 1986 CONTRACT PROPOSALS - IAFF 1275
DATE: May 30, 1986
The following items represent a proposed settlement of the labor
agreement between IAFF 1275 and the City of Edina for the contract
period of 1986:
- Salary: 5% increase in wages. This percentage of increase
represents the amount that the City has budgeted for all the
salary increases for 1986.
- Supplemental pay for fire motor operators and inspectors shall
be 6% of the top fire fighter pay.
- Insurance: Increase the employer contribution for dependent
health coverage to $165. This amount is the same that the
employer contributes for dependent health coverage for all
Public Works employees.
- Shift exchange: All shift exchanges that are made must be made
up within 12 months from the date on which the exchange is made.
- Floating holidays: Employees who are not actively employed with
the City 12 months in any calendar year (new hires, leaving
employment with less than twelve months in the calendar year,
leave of absence) shall be granted their floating holidays in
accordance with Article 20.3 on a pro -rated ratio of one day
for every three months of service or portion thereof.
KR/ CS /sw
TO: Mayor and City Council �l
FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineero�
VIA: Ken Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: West 50th Street - Construction - Final Plan
The Minnesota Department of Transportation has completed review and
approval of the West 50th Stret plans. We are now in a position to
give Final Approval to the plans and authorize. bids for the project.
The final estimated construction costs including engineering are as
follows:
Improvement No. Location Cost Funding
BA -264 W. 50th St. $1,008,329.72 State Aid
(Price increase over earlier estimate due to design change
required by MN DOT)
P -16
Wooddale Parking Lot
P -17 Utley Parking Lot
Also N.S.P. Lighting for Lots
86 -P -2 Wooddale Park
SS -376 Sanitary Sewer Repairs
WM -361 Watermain Revisions
$26,983.43 Assessed
$40,561.14 Assessed
$13,200.00 Assessed
$83,433.34 General Park Fund
$23,658.32 Utility Fund
$98,810.88 Utility Fund
Also N.S.P. Relocation of Overhead Lines to General Construct -
Underground $68,500.00 ion Fund
Estimated Grand Total: $1,363,476.83
The staff would recommend approval of the final plan and authorize bids
for the project. Staff will make a short presentation on the plans for
construction and detours that are planned.
FJH:Im
5/30/86
r
510 NORTH CENTRAL LIFE TOWER
445 MINNESOTA STREET
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
(812) 227 -8017
P. 0. BOX 848
340 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55903
(507) 268 -3156
315 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
WAYZATA. MINNESOTA 55391
(812) 475-0373
350 PARK AVENUE
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022
(212) 415-9200
DORSEY & WHITNEY
A Partnership Including Prclessional Corporations
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
(612) 340 -2600
TELEX 29-0605
TELECOPIER: (612)340-2868
THOMAS S. ERICKSON, P. A.
(612) 340 -2659
Mr. Kenneth Rosland
City Manager
7350 Gallagher Drive
Edina, Minnesota 55435
Dear Ken:
May 30, 1986
Re: Massage Parlor Licenses
Ordinance No. 1353
201 DAVIDSON BUILDING
8 THIRD STREET NORTH
GREAT FALLS, MONTANA 59401
(406) 727 -3632
304 TRANSWESTERN PLAZA 111
550 NORTH 31^ STREET
P. O. BOX 1179
BILLINGS, MONTANA 59103
(406) 252 -3800
30 RUE LA BOETIE
75008 PARIS, FRANCE
Oil 331 582 32 50
Pursuant to your request, I have reviewed, with
Gordon Hughes, Craig Swanson and Craig Larsen, Ordinance
No. 1353 relating to the licensing and regulating of physical
culture and health services and clubs, reducing clubs
and salons, massage parlors, sauna parlors and escort
services to determine what kinds of changes might be made
in the ordinance to better accommodate legitimate enterprises
and yet retain control over those that might later on
turn out to be problems for the City. That review has
resulted in the following possible changes to the ordinance
which will we believe allow legitimate enterprises to
be licensed and operate without endangering the morals,
health, safety and welfare of the community:
1. Investigation Fees. Investigation fees
presently are $50.00 for an individual and
$1,500 for a business no part of either
of which is refundable. We propose that
the license investigation fees remain the
same, but provide that any part of it not
used shall be refunded similar to the wine
ordinance. Then if the investigation costs
less than the $1,500, as they will in some
cases, the excess monies could be refunded
thereby reducing the costs to the licensee.
2. License Fee. The license fees presently
are $50 for an individual license and $3,000
for a business license. It is proposed
510 NORTH CENTRAL LIFE TOWER
445 MINNESOTA STREET
ST. PAUL,MINNESOTA 55101
(612) 227 -6017
P. 0. BOX 846
340 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55903
(507) 268 -3156
315 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391
(612) 475-0373
350 PARK AVENUE
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022
(212) 415-9200
DORSEY & WHITNEY
A Partnership Including Professional Corporations
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
(612) 340 -2600
TELEX 29-0605
TELECOPIER : (N2)340-2868
THOMAS S. ERICKSON, P. A.
(612) 340 -2659
Mr. Kenneth Rosland
City Manager
7350 Gallagher Drive
Edina, Minnesota 55435
Dear Ken:
May 30, 1986
Re: Massage Parlor Licenses
Ordinance No. 1353
_rt-L-
201 DAV10SON BUILDING
6 THIRD STREET NORTH
GREAT FALLS, MONTANA 59401
(406) 727 -3632
304 TRANSWESTERN PLAZA III
550 NORTH 31^ STREET
P. 0. BOX 1179
BILLINGS, MONTANA 59103
(406) 252 -3800
30 RUE LA BOETIE
75008 PARIS, FRANCE
011 331 562 32 50
Pursuant to your request, I have reviewed, with
Gordon Hughes, Craig Swanson and Craig Larsen, Ordinance
No. 1353 relating to the licensing and regulating of physical
culture and health services and clubs, reducing clubs
and salons, massage parlors, sauna parlors and escort
services to determine what kinds of changes might be made
in the ordinance to better accommodate legitimate enterprises
and yet retain control over those that might later on
turn out to be problems for the City. That review has
resulted in the following possible changes to the ordinance
which will we believe allow legitimate enterprises to
be licensed and operate without endangering the morals,
health, safety and welfare of the community:
1. Investigation Fees. Investigation fees
presently are $50.00 for an individual and
$1,500 for a business no part of either
of which is refundable. We propose that
the license investigation fees remain the
same, but provide that any part of it not
used shall be refunded similar to the wine
ordinance. Then if the investigation costs
less than the $1,500, as they will in some
cases, the excess monies could be refunded
thereby reducing the costs to the licensee.
2. License Fee. The license fees presently
are $50 for an individual license and $3,000
for a business license. It is proposed
e
DORSEY & WHITNEY
Mr. Kenneth Rosland
May 30, 1986
Page 2
to retain the individual license at $50
and reduce the business license fee to $200.
It is the opinion of the reviewing parties
that the $3,000 license fee will not deter
an illegitimate business, but may well deter
a legitimate business. In addition, since
the ordinance was initially adopted some
8 years ago, the law has become clearer
that license fees cannot be used as a source
of income, but must be related to the cost
of issuing and enforcing the license and
related regulations. It is the opinion
of the reviewing parties that a $200 fee
more closely relates to such cost.
3. To more fully protect the morals, health,
safety and welfare of the community, we
thought it appropriate to limit business
licenses for massage parlors to Regional
Medical Districts as established by the
Edina Zoning Ordinance. Such limitation
would help ensure that the massage parlor
would be legitimate and used in connection
with massages for health and medical reasons.
4. The Ordinance presently prohibits males
from massaging female patrons and vice versa.
It is proposed that this requirement be
deleted. The other provisions of the Ordinance
should protect from the illegitimate enterprises
and if the enterprise is legitimate there
is no need for such restrictions.
The Ordinance also provides an exemption from
the business license requirements, for businesses which
perform massage services, but where the annual gross revenue
from such massage services is less than 25% of the total
annual gross revenue of the business. To evidence that
a business has such 25% or less gross income from massage
services, the applicant must give an affidavit to that
effect to the City Clerk and also a copy of the financial
statement for the business certified by an independent
accountant. The delivery of the financial statement has
been honored more in the breach than in the observance;
the businesses, of course, have a natural reluctance to
give us their financial statements. In lieu thereof it
iI . 6
IV
r
HORSEY & WHITNEY
Mr. Kenneth Rosland
May 30, 1986
Page 3
is suggested that, as in the discussions on the wine
ordinance, the applicant, if he desires not to give us
• financial statement, give the City a certification by
• certified public accountant, acceptable to the City,
that the annual gross revenue of the business from massage
services is less than 25% of its total annual gross revenue.
I trust these suggested and possible changes
are responsive to the concerns expressed by you and the
City Council.
TSE /lsm
If there are any questions, please let me know.
Very truly yours,
omas S. Erickson
ORDINANCE NO. 825 -AlO
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825)
BY ADDING LOCATION REQUIREMENTS FOR EMERGENCY POWER
GENERATORS, AIR CONDITIONING COMPRESSORS AND PLAYGROUND
EQUIPMENT AND HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS FOR WIND GENERATORS
AND SOLAR COLLECTORS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 11, Paragraph F, Subparagraph 3, of Ordinance No. 825
is hereby amended by adding the following thereto:
"(c) wind generators and solar collectors 30 feet pr the height
of the principal structure,
whichever is less"
Sec. 2. Section 11, Paragraph G, of Ordinance No. 825 is: hereby amended by
adding the following thereto:
118. Emergency power generators, air conditioning compressors, and
playground equipment. Shall be located only in the rear yard."
Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage
and publication.
First Reading: May 5, 1986
Second Reading:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
182 -2 -AlO
Mayor
-V�'A - ;�,
ORDINANCE NO. 1001 -A4
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1001
MAKING IT A MISDEMEANOR TO OPERATE CERTAIN
VEHICLES OR DEVICES IN DESIGNATED AREAS OF THE CITY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Ordinance No. 1001 is amended by
addition of the following section:
"Sec. 20. Operation of Certain Devices in
Designated Areas of the City. No skateboards, roller
skates, unlicensed bicycles, scooters or similar
vehicles and devices shall be used or operated on,
in, over or across any public parking ramp, public
street, public sidewalk, or other publicly owned
or controlled property, in the following designated
areas of the City:
a. 50th and France: the area bounded by France
Avenue on the East, West 49 1/2 Street on
the North (including the public sidewalks
and parking lots on the North side of West
49 1/2 Street), Halifax Avenue on the West
(including the public sidewalks on the West
side of Halifax Avenue) and by West 51st Street
on the South (including the public sidewalks
on the Southerly side of West 51st Street)."
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force
and effect upon its passage and publication.
Attest:
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published in on .
Clerk
Mayor
link
V:!�_
MEMORANDUM
TO: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER
FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: DIVISION OF VOTING PRECINCT NO. 15 /POLLING LOCATIONS
DATE: MAY 29, 1986
Voting Precinct No. 15 (lower one -half of southwest quadrant of City) is
the largest precinct in the City with 2,509 registered voters as of
May 5, 1986. With anticipated development along Cahill Road in the next
few years, I recommend that the precinct be divided as indicated on the
attached map and that a new Precinct No. 20 be established.
Minnesota Election Laws prohibit precinct boundary changes during the period
from January 1 in any year ending in seven to January 1 in any year ending in
two (1 -1 -87 to 1- 1 -92).
As to polling locations, Creek Valley Baptist Church has made their Fellowship
Hall available and I recommend that Precinct No. 11 vote at that location,
thus making Wooddale Montessori School (formerly Cahill) available for the
new Precinct No. 20. Precinct No. 15 will continue to vote at Valley View
Jr. High School.
(Second map was given to Council before meeting suggesting minor change
between Pct. 10 and Pct. 15 to follow physical features.)
rA
6-
i
MAW
tYZr'�;s� ��`�►u�.` ���` r t'�x?y �� 7�i E =, — �� d1•1
Emu 21
it log
„ �. �, t '' ��►� �� .. �� .VIII
."yi e ;� i n.^ �-+�����,,��-• ,� �� i M . �`.' lilt
"0.
vM �'la"�e`:iC�ti� J& >a
1�'
m 1, logo
�•/ ■ \•i i vT � - •�, �j..``�,�,�'s.•III��O• �9►, , _ ..�� �- iiL= � �■ a!
• ■?�- ..�� ■- .III �G � ��i`
SUN
q WE
gill I WE
EWE NEW
ME
MA
a Ban 40
OVES
�/� -��i ■■u■ •..,'� 111111 Nom..► i X141 �. ► �I� f° _ �i
111 1111 AMON, MEMO
loll Now
=i � �= j .■ �1■■r �: ;� - "111111 �.,IiD �. � .;,� � �► , :.�„ j ���►,� �yy�� � a �'
AM� �iJ 11111�� ��� ■■� ■ ■■■■■ ■ ■ ■� ■loan ■�/ ■��■� G� ��j ���1 1���� �. w■
If dr
� .�■■f� � ��l-.a �.- � I,�i�lf�`°'��i�rr;� • ,; x.1111.
.1�p�`'�� a� t q r�, �,��� a �'', � - ` /■■� �', �.
iii. �..�;�♦ �� �i�:j' �:�.; � J � � ::�:��� - '
mum ! ••1 ~,��,,'�� �-4Per , � "�� nun � ��
WE
?:iii ii�:■i illllN I.-M �' ■' •����
�' I llli
' 19 t j
F EDINA
CHECK R,
(ER
06 -02 -86
:E 1
w
CHECK _NO. _DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV-
-
- - -ITE.M
_q_P.O...O_MESSAGE
140095
�!
05/28/86
37.87
COMM OF REVENUE
SALES TAX
10 -3357- 000 -00
MANUAL
140095
05/28/8E
113.60
COMM OF REVENUE _
SALES TAX
23 -3!57- 000 -00
MANUAL
140095
05/28/86
4,777.52
COMM OF REVENUE
SALES TAX
21 -3!57- 000 -00
MANUAL
„ I 140095
05/28/86
67.09
COMM OF REVENUE
SALES TAX
28 -3357- 000 -00
MANUAL
140095 ___,05/28/86
_.
--
- 40.43
COMM OF REVENUE
-- ---- - - - --- __-SALES-TAX
SALES TAX
29- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
140095
05/28/86
224.24
COMM OF REVENUE
_
40 -3157- 000 -00
- -- --
MANUAL
140095
05/28/8E
69661.44
COMM OF REVENUE
SALES TAX
50- 3!57- 001 -00
MANUAL
140095
05/28/86 _
129249.66 _
COMM OF REVENUE
TAX
_0 -3357- 002 -00
MANUAL
1140095
05128/86
119278.85
COMM OF REVENUE
STATE SALES
_
50 -3357- 003 -00
MANUAL
359450.70 •
•+ *-CKS
" 140396
05/28/86
334.61
NORTHWESTERN BELL
._. TEVHONE _
10- 4256 - 510 -51
MANUAL
140396
05/28/86
52.31
NORTHWESTERN BELL
TEL -HONE
10- 4256- 622 -62
MANUAL
140396
05/28/86
14.95
NORTHWESTERN BELL
TELiHONE
23 -4256- 611 -61
MANUAL
140396 -__
05/28/86
_ - 154.85
NORTHWESTERN BELL
_ TEUHONE
28 -4256- 708 -70
MANUAL
140396
05/28/86
14.95-
NORTHWESTERN BELL
_
TEUiHONE
50 -4256- 821 -82
MANUAL
..
571.67 •
.I
- - - - --
- ----- - -- -- -" - -.. _ ..
* *: -CKS
y
140704
05/28/86
250.00 ___
DAKOTA_ COUNTY_
BAIL MONEY__
3800- 000 -00
MANUAL
140704
05/28/8E
250.00
DAKOT CTY COURT
_ _10-
BAIL MONEY -
_10 -3800- 500 -50
MANUAL
er t, 140704
05/28/86
250.00-
DAKOT CTY COURT
CORRECTION
30 -3600- 500 -50
MANUAL
250.00
y ff*fff
+ ** -CKS
X140735
05/28/8E
250.00
SCOTT COURT
BAIL MONEY
10- 3800 - 000 -00
MANUAL
y
250.00 •
* ** -CKS
v ;
__143356
05/22/86
149.60 -_ _MN
- BLUE PRINi -
_ LUMBER_-
260 -26
149.60 +
_
' _ _ - -_
-1.0- .4604-
-
• *+ -CKS
I
y l 148744
05/28/86
90.00
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE
10- 4290- 510 -51
MANUAL
„i
9.0.00 +
rr� � f*r*r*
+ ** -CKS
153003
05/22/96
33.45
ALBINSON
BLUE PRINTING
10- 4570 - 260 -26
6038
153003
05/22/8E
370.97
ALBINSON
LUMBER
10 -4604- 260 -26
6253
.i -- 153003
05122/86
497.00
-* - - --
ALBINSON
CAP OUTLAY
--
10- 4900-260 -26
973754
' .
901.42
Wi " I
153008 05/22/86 18.43 KAMAN BEARING & SPLY REPAIR PARTS 30- 4540- 560 -56
?� 153008 05/22/86 ____82.50 KAMAN BEARING B SPLY REPAIR PARATS 10- 4540 - 560 -56
100.93 * --
lo', I
' -_ * * * * ** - --
It
- ..__.... __ ... * ** -CKS
1
t
1
e
4
e
e
4
1986 CITY
`
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
06 -02 -86 PAGE 2
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT-NO.-INV.- q P.O. q MESSAGE
153012
05/28/86
24.95
AUTOMOBILE SERVICE C
CONi REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
85413
24.95
- - -- - -
- - --
153013
05/28/86
_ 101.51
_ ALTERNATOR REBUILD
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
7520
� 153013
05/28/86
105.68
_
ALTERNATCR REBUILD
TOOLS
_ -
10- 4580 - 560 -56
-
1051
207.19 •
* ** -CKS
153025
G5/28/86
224.19
BADGER METER INC
REPAIR PARTS
40 -4540- 807 -80
.
153026
05/28/86
_
266.54
BADGER METER INC
_
REPAIR PARTS _
40- 4540 - 807 -80
' 153026
05/28/8E
424.75
BADGER METER INC
REPAIR PARTS
40 -4540- 807 -80
915.48 •
* ** -CKS
153033
05/28/86
68.00
BERGFORO TRUCKING
INVENTORY
50 -6626- 822 -82
153033
05/28/86
181.80
BERGFORD TRUCKING
INVENTORY
50 -4626- 842 -84
153033
05/28/86
125.80
--
BERGFORO - TRUCKING -
-- - - - --
INVENTORY
50 -4626- 862 -86
375.60
- - --- - -. -
* ** -CKS
' 153037
05/22/86
1x652.25
BRAUN ENG TESTING IN
CONSi
60 -1300- 268-04
19652.25 +
tk*f Rf
+•* -CKS
153041
05/28/86
29150.43
BURY 8 CARLSON INC
BLACKTDP
10- 4524- 301 -30
153041
05/28/8E
103.53
BURY & CARLSON INC
BLACKTOP
30- 4524- 301 -30
153041
05/28/89
149081.81
BURY & CARLSON INC
BLACKTOP
10 -4524- 314 -30
153041
'
05/28/6E
39617.71
BURY & CARLSON INC
__
BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 314 -30
153041
05/28/86
554.33
BURY & CARLSON INC
BLACKTOP
10 -4524- 803 -80
`
153041
05/28/86
58.35
-
& CARLSON INC
BURT - - -
- -- -
BLACKTOP
40 -4524- 801 -80
209566.16 t
- -
--
-- _...- - -- -.�. - -- - --
-
** *-CKS
153047
05/22/86
14.52
BROWN PHOTO
PHOTO SUPP
10- 4508-420 -42
`
: _ ... - - --
- -- --
14.52 •
* ** -CKS
153049
05/22/86
54.00
BURESH ROBERT_..-. - -_
MEETINGS --_ - -
10- 4206 - 440 -44
54.00 +
`h
* ** -CKS
153053
05/28/86
40.96
BROWNING FERRIS
DEDICATION
10- 2152- 000 -00
f
40.96 *
v
-- -
_ 153054_
05/22/86
!05/28/86
250.56
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
J
26652
153054
252.70
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
_
33365 -
153054
..I
05/22/8E
65.52
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
REPAIR .PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
35307
^ 1n ' �jl »` coxwx cxccx n /cn 06-02-86 �c u
~
c*ccn mn._oxrE.__ ____ _yEaoop____ DE-SCR .Oumv_mm~_Imm� w p°w. w mcuousc _
_
153054 ns/aa/oa 112.08 axrrcnv wouc*ousc scm ouppLucm *0-4504-801-80 35587
-
zsooGo -- ��v�dx6�-----'----'-�ii.��---
511.15 °
- /
153062 usxuoxn�� _ _ _ 96.00
y*.00 °
BROCK WHITE
°°°-cxs
2 4 w4 6------ '
~
-
n
°=-cKu
°°°-c*u
°°^-cwu
°°^-cxo
^^°-cnx
153072
05x22v8e
135.*2
oxxLv
cnwor ncponru
uoxExrzoama
10-4210-140-14
135.42
153073
ooxuuvua
109.25
COCA
COLA BnrrLINo----
-chmccmsxbwo --- '--
27~+62*-66*-66
/
~]
109.25 °
153079
osvoo/ee----'
- 86.91 ------'
0Amr!�---------'l0-45*0-56o-56
368786
153079
osxoa/xe
18.10
Cmrco
ncpxzo pxmTs
10-4540-560-56
36891*
~.
1530132
05/22v86-
2i'06-------Chii6iAi
FfkE- -SAFE rY----
SAFETY -EQUIP ---- ---10-46+2-420-42--''
-
~
oz.uo ^
153090
05/28me
29.73
Ccxr_puusR
TnxIm____
RcpoIm pxmru
10-4540-560-56
8291
vssuyo
05/22/86
181.53
ccnr
poucx 7wmxm ___
ncpxzx pAnra
10-*540-560-5*
muan
~ /
211.26 °
153091
oo/ov/ae
1729285.*7
--ciry
np-cDiNx-
- ----uNrcx
pumo ToxmSpcm'---'
"-1n-dono-000 uo---'
° !
153o91
nsvouxmc
118.00
czry
OF
coxmA
uxrcn
10-425e-44644
�
153091
05/22/86
_ _45~3
CITY _op_Epzm
uwrco
10-+258-646-64
153091
05x27x8e
ouo"000.00
czry
op
cozmx
zwxcnrumo TRANSFER -----uo-xozo-ono-oo--------'
~ |
153091
05v27v86
*65.00
czry
or
cuzmx
zwrcnrumo TnxwoFce
15-2050-um#-00
'
znuuyz
osxur/uu
^ao.00_
czry
OF
cozmx___
cmnwccrxom
15-2o50-000-00
1
153091 �
153091
05x27x86
05v27/8e
300.00
165.04
cIrr
czvr
OF
OF
__
cozm»
cuImA
zmrcnpuwo rmxmoFck-____
zmrcnpumo vnxwupco
as-0000-uuo-uu—'
15-2050-000-00
-
.'�_zsoun1___-__os/ovvaa________
398.40
CITY
EuxmxzmrcnpumoJxowopcm______2o-cono-uou-on__________
-
zuoonz
n��ov�oe
z"sov.*y
c�rr
mp
cozwx
xmrcnrumo xn«wmrcm
am-2UsV-uuo-no
~|
vosoyv
osxavxnu
16^396.77
caTv
OF
coxm»
zwrcxrmmu rnxwuFcm
27-2050-000-00
153091
_ os/uvvue
179181.38
CITY ,OF
EoImx_ ___
zmrcnpumo' Tnxmnpcn_____
xe-zn!n-ouu-oo___
153091
05/27v8e
180.35
cIry
OF
cnzmx
zwrcxromm rnxwoFcn
29-e050-000-00
153091
05/27v86
oo.sxs.*s
czrY
OF
coImx
zwrcxpumm xnxwuFcm
40-2050-000-00
0»/2y/a65s"9ou.O2CITY
OF
EDINA
ImrcnpumD_Im^mxFE
0-2050-aoo-00
i�--1530*1
unvzvvae
ao"zvu.xz
CITY
OF
EDINA
xmxcnpumo xnxmspc
o-oonu-puo-oo'---------
~�1
'
153091
05/27/8e
260086.25
CITY
OF
coxmx
xmxcm pumo TammsFcm
ea-unmo-000-nn
n
°=-cKu
°°°-c*u
°°^-cwu
°°^-cxo
^^°-cnx
1986 czn OF coxmx c*ccx mcaznrcx 06-02-86 pxmc �
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. N MESSAGE
°
~
- oux"voo.xn °
i °^.°^^ - ' - -- -----'----- -- -'-----'------
~/
/ 000n^ 05/28/86 i _-_-83.53 '_'_--C«gH- REGISTER _SALES OFFICE -SUPPLIES
83.53 °
~
-2 7.-.45 16-..661-66--255691
~ ,sumo
05x28v86
*z.no
cuxrzs
z000
mppxcc Supp
10-+516-510-51
ao*nn
*o.00 °
153125
oxxez/ou
69r.35
ncxxr
Suppu - -'
ssm oopP -
' 10-*504-390-30
x**ua
~ 153125
nsxzu/ou
*z.am
ncxsr
suppLv
cLc«mImG nupp
10-4512-6*6-6+
u*nan
� 153125
05/28/8*
^"zao.on ------�cki
wcnxr
ouppLr
Comur
ov-IZuo-000-oo
z«nza
153125
05x286---'--'--
�v
63. 40
t-�uOpi
-mcm
x*ona
�
49982.*0 °
153126
05v28/8e
zrz.zo
- 'o^xzs -
cusEmE — -
uscm cmmrxOL
- 60-*100-985-90
~ 153126
05/28/86
+v.o*
DAVIS
cuocmc
nzLcxGc
e0-42 0 e-985-90
�
noz.o� °
.
| !
^ ) 153136
05x28v8e
n.uo
105.80
___
tAoi Vxxocxucm
- ----SIGNS
u POSTS '
-- - 10-4542-325-30
6255-7
= ! 153136
nnvuyxoe
mu ~ no
cxxL p
AwocnScm
scw u p p
40-450*-801-80
e2431
153136
oo/uzvee
71.00
cxwL r
xxucnscm
scm oupp�xcn
4o-4no*-ao1-oo
62125
~
—'
°------------------------
278.80
'-- '- - --- ''----'--
- - --
~� zxoz*u
05/28v86
-
110.10
-''------
cLxzm
' --- ' -
oxpery suppLv
- - -
scm oupp
-
10-4504-540-5+
-------------'------'---'-
'--- -'------'-'' --------
-- ----'-
`
` xozzso 05/22v8e 3.93 -' - ENszmE'pxnrm'suppLv - ocpxze P«nvu - 10-45*0-560-56 85802
3.93 °
`
'
� xoozxa os�ooxua �o.vo FAIRVIEW *oupzrx� scnxxcco xo-*oo*-woo-*2
. _- _''-- -_- . ' - -_ -- - -
*o.ru °
A
°^^-cwo
^°°-cwu
°^°-cxa
°°°-cnu
^°°-cws
°°°-cwo
|� -------- ----� -- ---- -- ---�----------- -----
153162 on/uuxoa 55.28 rmuLcn cuscrxzc mcpAam pxnvm 27-*540-663-66 52212
J - _
55.28 �°_
cwn
-55. 17'-
55.17 °
�����
1986 C
OF EDINA
CHECK ,TER
06 -02 -8E
GE 5
CHECK ..,.
DATE_ -
AMOUNT
—_ -
-,- VENDOR -
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. _INV._p P.O." #
MESSAGE
frrr►t
* ** -CKS
153189
05/28/86
29811.50
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO
BLDG IMPROV
25- 4924- 540 -54
159115
29811.50
•fffff
-
*r* -CKS
I 153194
05/22/86
19.00
GENERAL COMMUNICATNS
EQUIP RENAL
10- 4226- 301 -30
22934
_ 153194
05/22/86
337.60
GENERAL COMMUNICATNS
EQUIP MAINT
10- 4274 - 420 -42
64191
153194
05/28/86
23.80
GENERAL COMMUNICATNS
RADIO SERY
10- 4294 - 440 -44
64614
153194
05/22/86
266.25
GENERAL COMMUNICATNS
-_
RADIO SERY
_
10 -4254- 560 -56
22932
646.65
153195
05/22/86
22.83
GOLF CAR MIDWEST
REPAIR PARTS
27 -4540- 671 -66
7552
_
22.83
•
--
---- - - - ---
-- -
* ** -CKS
153199
05/22/86
47.44
_ _ G. J. PARTS__ -__ _
REPAIR PARATS
10 -4540- 560 -56
08775
47.44
*
-
153200
05/28/86
179.40
OFFICE PROD__._.-
OFFICE SUPP
10- 4516 - 510 -51
frrttt
179.40
*
- -__
- -- -"
_ 153209
05/28/86
- -- -
19.12
---
•- - - -- - - - - -._ - - -- --
GENUINE PARTS
REPAIR PARTAS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
374382
•*• -CKS
153209
05/22/86
_ 16.13
_- _--
_GENUINE PARTS -
GENERAL SUPP
28 -4504- 708 -70
846475
35.25
*
- - -- -
- --
-
-- -- -
-- - - - - - -.. - -- - - - -. _ __ - - - ---
___
. -.
•r* -CKS
_ 153238
05/22/86
24.00
WM H MCCOY
GEN SUPP
10- 4504- 301 -30
126102
153238
05/22/86
24.00
WM H MCCOY �. - - - - -- --
GEN SUPP
- --
10 -4504- 301 -30
124078
48.00
*
- - - - -- - - - --
- -- -
!tt **!
*r *-CKS
153244
05/22/86
36.50
HAYDEN MURPHY
TOOLS
10- 4580 - 301 -30
- -- - - - -- -
.. - - -- - - - -- - - -
- 36.50
*
- frffrr
a *• -CKS
153253
05/22/86
26.50
HUMPHREY RADIATOR
CUNT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
153253
05/22/86
89.50
HUMPHREY RADIATOR
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248- 560 -56
- -- - -
-
-, I
r• *-CKS
153256
05/28/86
87.65
ICSI
EQUIP MAINT
10- 4274- 420 -42
15502
87.65
•
* ** -CKS
"- 153267-__
_ 05/22186 _
_ 485.01
_.
IBM CORPORATION ... ".. _..
SERY CONT....
10 -4288- 510 -51
.r
1986 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT
485.01 •
153277 G5/22/8E 231.40
231.40 •
rrrrr•
153286
153286
153286
fill ++
153295
153295
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
06 -02 -86 PAGE 6
ACCOUNT N0. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE
Y
* ** -CKS
CARLSON PRINTING PRINTING 28- 4600 - 706 -70 35042
• ** -CKS
05/22/86
57.48
JUSTUS
LUMBER
CONST
27 -1'00- 000 -00
26920
05/22/86
52.20
JUSTUS
LUMBER
CDNSi
27- 1300- 000 -00
26075
05/22/86 _
16.60
JUSTUS
_
LUMBER -
CONST
_
27- 1300- 000 -00
26730
_ _ _ _
GEN SUPP -
126.28 •
A68162
153300
05/22/86
93.65
KOKESH ATHLETIC
GEN SUPP
10 -4504- 646 -64
A68157
153300
*fr -CKS
05/22/86
48.48
iRIARCO
ARTS g_CRAFT
INVEN SUPP
23- 1209- 000 -00
184631
i
05/22/86
_ _ _
52.01
TRIARCO
ARTS _ & CRAFT
_ _
CRAFT SUPP
-
23 -4588- 616 -61
184631
100.49 •
777.87 •
!fr -CKS
153300
05/22/86
229.90
KOKESH ATHLETIC
GEN SUPP
10- 4504- 646 -64
A67971
153300
05/22/86
94.22
_ _
KOKESH ATHLETIC
_ _ _ _
GEN SUPP -
_
10- 4504- 646 -64
A68162
153300
05/22/86
93.65
KOKESH ATHLETIC
GEN SUPP
10 -4504- 646 -64
A68157
153300
05/22/86
301.10
KOKESH ATHLETIC
GEN SUPP
10 -4504- 646 -64
A67970
153300
05/22/86
59.00
KOKESH ATHLETIC
SOCCER EQUIP
10 -4598- 627 -62
A68718
"
777.87 •
153301
05/22/86
499.70
KREHER 8PRG. 8 ALIGN
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
11781
"
499.70 •
++ + + ++
•f +-CKS
05/28/8E
11.99
KNOX LUMBER--CO-----.GEN
SUPP.--...---,--,
10 -4504- 318 -30
447812
__153304
153304
05/28/86
24 .00
_
KNOX LUMBER CO
GEN SUP _
__
- 10 -4504- 335 -30
447227
153304
05/28/86
15.44
KNOX LUMBER CO
GEN SUPP
10- 4504 - 646 -64
440499
153304
05/28/86
33.58
KNOX LUMBER CO
GEN SUPP
10- 4504- 646 -64
440408
153304
05/22/86
12.60
KNOX LUMBER CO
GEN SUPP
10- 4504 - 646 -64
447713
yi
153304
05/22/8E
19665.86
KNOX LUMEER CO
GUARD RAIL MAT
10- 4`_46- 340 -30
404503
153304
05/22/86
52.53
KNOX LUMBER CO
LUMBER
10 -4604- 646 -64
447712
153304
05/22/86
_
55.37
KNOX LUMBER CO
_
LUMBER -
10 -4604- 646 -64
447657
153304
05/28/8E
66.45
KNOX LUMBER CO
LUMBER
10 -4604- 646 -64
440598
153304
05/28/8E
23.93
KNOX LUMBER CO
LUMBER
10 -4604- 646 -64
447562
153304
05/23/86
139.57
KNOX LUMBER CO
CONST
27- 1300 - 000 -00
447228
153304
05/28/86
23.31
KNOX LUMBER CO
CONST
27 -1200- 000 -00
447753
05/28/86-
74.36
KNOX-LUMBER-CO
CONSTRUCTION
27 -1300- 000 -00
813449
153304
_ __
05/22/86
_
42.00
_
KNOX LUMEER CO
CONST -^
- 27 -1300- 000 -00
447747
153304
05/22/86
31.37
KNOX LUMBER CO
CONST
27- 1300 - 000 -00
457261
153304
05/22/66
13.73
KNOX LUMBER CO
PARTS
27 -4620- 662 -66
447558
21286.09
rrfrrf
- --
- -- - -
- - -- -
- -_., -- -
- --
-- �_ -._. * ** -CKS
;,
153313
05/22/86
406.85
JOHN H FOSTER
REPAIR PARTS
40 -4540- 801 -80
• 1986 CI
F EDINA
153323
05/28/86
CHECK R
TER
153324
06 -02 -86
:E 7
Y CHECK NO.
OATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N
MESSAGE
05/22/86
., 153324
406.85
153325
05/22/86
� *rrrrr
153323
05/2,9/86
19419.84
153337
rffffr
CHARGES
rrrrr•
153342
05/22/86
LOGIS
COMPUTER
CHARGES
40- 4232 - 800 -80
*** -CKS
153315
05/28/86
476.75
ANCHOR
PAPER
-
PAPER
--
SUPPLIES
- - - - -- -
10- 4514 - 520 -52
-
50 -4233- 840 -84 _
290.04
LOGIS
476.75 *
CHARGES
50- 4223!- 860 -86
79946.09 *
ffrkff
4.38
LONG LAKE FORD TRACT
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540-662 -66 017306
4.38 *
* ** -CKS
153317
05/22/8E
116.73
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
GEN
SUPP
10 -4504- 301 -30
153317
05/22/8E
77.41
__. LAWSON
PRODUCTS
GEN
SUPP
10- 4504- 301 -30
153317
05/22/86
105.68
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
GEN
_
SUPP
_ _ _
10- 4504 - 322 -30
153317
05/22/8E
221.05
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
GEN
SUPP
10- 4504- 646 -64
153317
05/28/86 _
- 173.65
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
_ _ GEN
SUPP - __- _
-__ _ 10 -4504- 646 -64
153317
05/22/8E
93.50
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PAR
TS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
153317
05/22/86
316.74
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PARTS
10- 4620- 560 -56
19104.76
153316
05/22/86
14.85
LEEF BROS INC
GEN
SUPP
23 -4504- 614 -61
` � rrrrr•
LINHOFF A- ^
153323
05/28/86
153324
05/22/86
153324
05/22/86
153324
05/22/86__
153324
05/22/86
153324
05/22/86
153324
05/22/86
153324
05/22/86
., 153324
05/22/86
153325
05/22/86
� *rrrrr
153323
05/2,9/86
19419.84
153337
05/28/86
CHARGES
rrrrr•
153342
05/22/86
LOGIS
COMPUTER
*** -CKS
10.00
LINHOFF A- ^
PHOTO SUPP
10 -4508- 440-44 102447
10.00
920.72
LOGIS
COMPUTER
CHARGES
10- 4228 - 160 -16
19434.11
LOGIS
COMPUTER
CHARGES
10- 4230 - 160 -16
19999.45 _
_ LOGIS _
- -
COMPUTER-CHARGES----
____10 -4223- 200- 20______
19419.84
LOGIS
COMPUTER
CHARGES
10 -4233- 420 -42
19301.35
LOGIS
COMPUTER
CHARGES
40- 4232 - 800 -80
290.04
LOGIS_ _ - _
COMPUTER
CHARGES _
50 -4233- 820 -82
290 -04
LOGIS
COMPUTER
--
CHARGES
-
50 -4233- 840 -84 _
290.04
LOGIS
COMPUTER
CHARGES
50- 4223!- 860 -86
79946.09 *
4.38
LONG LAKE FORD TRACT
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540-662 -66 017306
4.38 *
* ** -CKS
10.D0 LINHOFF PHOTO SUPP 10- 4508 +440 -44 102787
10.00
** *-CKS
150.81 LAKE_STATE EQUIP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 P06980
150.81 • -- -- - -- - - -- -
* ** -CKS
293.34 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC REPAIR PAR TS 10- 4540- 560 -56 63626
293.34
* ** -CKS
- -- - ----- - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - -- -- ---------- r- f---------- --------------------- - - - - -- - - - -- - -- --
9
1986 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
06 -02 -86
PAGE 8
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR _ --
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. 9
MESSAGE
_I
153344
05/28/86
76.00
MED OXYGEN & EQUIP
EQUIP MAINT
10 -4214- 449 -44
153344
05/28/86
84.00
MED OXYGEN & EQUIP
EQUIP MAINT
10- 4274 - 449 -44
153344
05/28/8E
17.05
MED OXYGEN & EQUIP
1ST AID SUPP
10- 4510- 440 -44
177.05 *
ft / #ff
• ** -CKS
153346
05/22/86
1849061.90
MET N WASTE C L COMM
SEWER SERV
40- 4312-801 -80
1849061.90
153347
05/28%86
-
900.00
-
'MINNEAPOLIS GUN CLUB
- - -- -
AMMUNiCTION
29- 4648-720 -72
-
500.00 .•
** *-CKS
153356
05/22/86_______
- 78.30
-�
MN BLUEPRINT
-- --
LUMBER
10 -4604- 260 -26
78.30
- - -- -
- - -- -------- - - - -
--
fkf kff
-
* * *-CKS
153359
05/28/8E
2.83
MINN TORO INC
GEN SUPP
10- 4504- 318 -30
050640
°
153359
05/28/86 --
2.90 - - -- - -
MINN TORO INC
-- -
GEN SUP
10- 4504 - 318 -30
050640
153359
05/28/86
23.45
MINN TORO INC
--
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
050640
153359
05/28/86
48.40
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
050640
153359
05/22/8E
243.74
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 670 -66
607014
153359
05/22/86
103.16
-
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 670 -66
606424
424.48
153360
05/22/86
41.67
NINNESOTA WANNER
REPAIR PARTS
21 -4540- 662 -66
063031
41.67 •
•
CKS
1
153381
05/22/86
5.43
STAR & TRIBUNE
ADVERTISING
23- 4214 - 610 -61
5.43 •
- - - --
-- -- -- -. -. -.
V �
# f f t # •
#: #-CKS
153383
05/22/86
555.54
MPLS COMP TREAS
WATER
40- 4640 - 803 -80
555.54 •
#ktk#t
* #► -CKS
153388
05/28/86
104.20
NTL ATOMIK MOTOR _
REPAIR PAR JS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
285515
L153388
05/22/86
11.30
NTL ATOMIK MOTOR
REPAIR PAR "TS
10 -4540- 560 -56
282707
-153388
05/28/86
11.30
NTL ATOMIK MOTOR
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
284238
153388
05/22/86
45.50
NTL ATOMIK MOTOR
_ _-
REPAIR PARTS J
10- 4540 - 560 -56
.
153388
05/28/86
21.96
NTL ATOMIK MOTOR
TOOLS
10- 4580 - 560 -56
283523
194.26
** #-CKS
05/22/86
29011.46
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO
TIRES TUBES
10 -46 4616 - 560 -56
-
i7'�153400
29011.46
1386 C
JF EDINA
CHECK t, TER
06 -02-86
GE 9
_CHECK NJ.
DATE
AMOUNT
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. - NP.O. N
MESSAGE
--
�.
rt►frr
* * *- C K S
153412
05/22/86
82.51
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
INVEN
23- 1209 - 000 -00
122750
153412
05/22/86
- _ _19.80
- NY GRAPHIC SUPPLY - T
INVEN
23-1209-000-00.122742
102.31
+
-
' rfrrt•
***-CKS
153411
05/22/86
110.10
OFFSET PRINTING
PRINTING
10- 4600- 420 -42
26490
110.10
•►rrtt
* *• -CKS
153421
05/22/96
105.51
OLSON CHAIN B CABLE
GEN SUPP
10- 4504- 646 -64
56459
105.51
•
** *-CKS
153436
05/22/86
61.33
PUMPS-&.-PETER SERV SERV ___
REPAIR PARATS
10- 45.40- 540 -54
7157
61.33
tR•f tk
153443
05/22/8E
48.50
POMMER MFG CO
FIG SKATING
10- 2235- 000 -00
46546
48.50
•
r••kf•
r *• -CKS
153452
05/28/86
152.28
QUICK SERW BATTERY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
08774
153452
05/28/86
25.44
QUICK SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PAR TS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
09444
153452
05/29/86
104.03
__QUICK_ - SERV . BATTERY- ._______.
REPAIR PARTS,
10- 4540 - 560 -56
09186
153452
05/28/8E
4.38
QUICK SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
08779
.
j
286.13
+
- - - --
-- ---- - -- - --
- -
* +► -CKS
153457
05/22/86
32.30
R.L.GOULC g CO.INC._-__-___REPAIR-
PARTS
4540 - 662 -66
32.30
•
_____- _.- .__27-
rrrrr4
-- - -- - - --
-- _-- -- - - - --
- -- _ - -__ .--
- - - - --
+ +.-CKS
-
153465
05/22/8E
105.25
RICHFIELD PLUMB & CO
CONT SERV
10- 4200 - 621 -62
9529
153465
05/22/86
108.90
_._ - RICHFIELC PLUMB -8_CO ,___-
1
214.15
-_CONT
•
__REPAIRS
^
-.. _. - - --
- --- -
- - - --
C K S
153469
05/28/86
33.53
ROAD MACHINERY
REPAIR PART'.S
10 -4540- 560 -56
M16124
33.53
•
iI
I rr•rrr
•• +-CKS
153483
l
05/28/86
214.00
49630
- -
SAYOIE SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
30- 4509- 646 -64
r
214.00
•
,auu cIry
~
OF coIwx
cmccx xcsInrcn
oa-ou-oa pxsc zn
cwccm NO.
'
DATE---
MOUNT—— - _-__-___-__-���pc�z�EM--DES-CRIP.lz
owT--No._z P.O. x ncasAmc
-
zuo^u^
_os/ao/ua _
_ 118.8Y
_ xMcnzc«m omxnccom
rcLcpHONE
�o-4256-5x0-s1
�
118.87 °
- '----'---
'
°°°-cxs
-. 15e90
un/ue/ue
147.38
uwcnurm WILLIAMS
ssm oupp
10-450*-32e-30
� zyxwo
novuu/ue _
_ 48.95
mocnuzm wxLLxxms
ecm ouppLzcu
10-*50*-646-6*
| 153*e0
onvzu/oe
194 90
u*cxwxm �xLLmmo -
comsrxucrIow - ----
ov-zZou-000-oo
� lax*oo
ns/uo/ue
^a.u5
mxcxuIm WILLIAMS
pxzmr
27-45**-661-66
� 153*90
05/2ev8_6______
___ o+.00 __ -----------'--
WILLIAMS
-----------
xumr
�*���om-vo
*o*.un-°
-
--' '-
- -
°°°-cxu
� znn^*u
05v22/8e
100.00
snorouxLc poxo
rnmr ncpxznu
10-*248-560-56
nunox
� 153*92
osxuovae
_71.18- ------oourxoxLc
oour*oxLE rono
conmccrznw
10-*5*0-560-56
118495
153492
n:/zzxoa
41.18
runo---------
xcpxzn pxxrm --------'10-45*0-560-56
118*95
� 153*92
no/uu/oe
71.18
sourxoxLc rono
ncpAzu pxnrn
10-45*0-560-56
118*95
141.18 °
~ �
°°°-cxu
153502
05x22m6 -
1"458.3*-------§uouabxw'c�cumoitr-----comr
mcpAzn§' --'------
30139
_ zsosno
05x28v8e
19010.10-
suouxoAm cxcvmoLcr
cnaxccrsom
-
10 4o4o - oan-ea
, / | 15350e
uo/unvoa
52.50
noeunoxm cucxnuLcT
cumr REPAIRS
10-42q8-560-56 ��n-��
30273
153502
usvuaxoa
19010.10
SUBURBAN cucxxnLcr - -'
125 --
10-*248-560-56
� ^ 153502
|
05x28/86
195.00
ououxoxm cmcvauLcr
cnmr xcpxzms
10-4248-560-56
z"vos.o+
-
� | 153503
05/28/8e
128.86
uooumaxw pLumu oup
ncpxzm puoru '
10-45*0-6*6-*+
153503
05/22x96
zo.nv
oupu�oxm pLum� uup
---
rom�o
�o-*non-000-oo
-/
+
147.73
- '--'--
' -- - —
- � '
`
----------
' ------------------
^°°-cxx
� !
- - -'---
_' 153505
05x29/8e
r.pm
sum
xuocmrzoImu
10-4210-140-14
zo-*ozo �*m x+
�uu�oo
o�vuuxoa
oz.`s
oum
xox�xrus- xmm
10-*210- 140- x*
153505
05/28/8e
- -_
25.00
------ - -
-SUN -
- -
auouu -
-*soo-=" o-"°
-
�
-
°°°-cwu
ossnu
05x28v86
1.68
S pxuL 000x
ocm ooppLzco
10-*50+-120-12
153508
noxuu/oe
a.vo
sr pxuL-noum ' ------ 'scm
uoppLxco - --'
- 10-+504-1*0-1+
-
ususoo
ns/oovoe
o.u*
ur PAUL eomK
ecm ouppLzcs
10-4504-160-16
zoo�u�_____
oo�uzvae. _
_ ��.on ----'SY
ur p8u��o�
scm mupp
10-*504-*20-*2
zxma
_
153508
05v28/86
1*.11
PAUL- muou----------scm
oupp-
10-*50*-**0~*+
xonn-- - -- -
~|
153508
05/28v8e
n*.zo
or pxuL eunn
scm muppLzcm
10-+504-510-51
'
zsusou
oo/uevoe
zo.sa- --
nr pxuL onon
-or
cncmIT
10-*50*-510-51
zn000u
oo/euvoe
�i.uz
pxuL oumx - ' --scm
oopr'--------------
10-4504-5+0-5*
-- -' -
,ao.xo °
�
153512 05/22/3E 70.08
,
S r nnan Gcm uupp 10-*504-560-56 *onuo
1986 C1
iF EDINA
CHECK R.
(ER
06 -02 -86
;E 11
•
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT _ - --
VENDCR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. ._N
MESSAGE
70.08 +
-
-
-
** *-CKS
153526 -
05/22/86_
_ 69612.80
TRACY OIL ^ _
GASOLINE
10_4612- 560 -56
69612.80 •
_
..
frffrr
153530
05/28/8E
287.50
TEXGAS CORP
GEN SUPP
10- 4504- 301 -30
26262
287.50 •
rf *rrr
* *r -CKS
153548
05/22/86
73.50
CITY WEST
PRINTING
23- 4600- 610 -61
60455
73.50
- - - -- - ---
- -- -
r*a -CKS
153551
05/22/86
19242.60_
_ UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWENCE_
10 -4266- 420 -42
153551
05/22/86
35.00
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
_
UNIFORM ALLOWENCE
10 -4266- 460 -46
_
'
153551
05/22/86
216.00
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
GEN SUPP
10- 4504- 470 -47
19493.60 +
•,
:►r * **
* ** -CKS
153553
05/22/86
646.12
UNITED ELECTRiC CORP
CONSTRUCTION
27 -1300- 000 -00
646.12
..
* ►rrr •
--
- ----
- --- --
- - - --- -- -- .
* ** -CKS
153572
05/28/86
345.10 _ -_
. VAN PAPER CO
PAPER SUPPLIES
10- 4514 - 520 -52
8438
153572
05/29/8E
19297.50
VAN PAPER CO
GEN SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 664 -66
"!
153572
05/28/86
648.75
VAN PAPER CO
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 4504- 688 -68
.
153572
05/29/86
648.75-
VAN _PAPER CO _�
-GEN SUPPL_IES_
28- 4504 - 704 -70
29940.10 •
-
•
rktr *r
----
-- - -- -- --- - - - - -- -- --
*r *-CKS
153575
05/28/86
91.44
WATER PRCDUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540- 670 -66
1535 r5
05/22/86__
206.70
- WATER PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 -603- 80_009604
153575
05/28/86
200.75
_
WATER PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
40 -4540- 813 -80
009710
„
153575
05/28/8E
39.00
WATER PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540- 813 -80
J59169
537.89 *
I
153575
05/22/86
93.65
WATER PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 670 -66
009112
93.65 *
rf * * *r
* ** -CKS
�
153579
05/22/86
58.05
WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 301 -30
96163
153579
05/22/86
4.53
WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE
GEN SUPP
10 -4504- 301 -30
96826
153579
05/22/8f
-_ 10.98
WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE
GEN SUPP
10- °_04- 301 - 30_96822
-F
153579
153579
05/22/86
05/22/86
103.88
114.51
WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE
GEN SUPP
_4
10 -4504- 646 -64
963587
'i
WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4509 - 646 -64
94225
�
1986 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
06 -02 -86
PAGE 12
CHECK_NO.-
DATE_-------------AMOUNT.
-
VENOCR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV. p P.O. p
MESSAGE
291.95
•
153586
05/28/86
67.13
W W GRAIhGER
LUMBER
27 -4606- 661 -66
67.13
•
- -- - - - -- -
- - -- - - --
- _
tlttr!
153591
05/28/86
64.47
CECELIA SMITH
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 140 -14
64.47
+
153592
05/28/86
29.95
MID CENTRAL FIRE
EQUIP MAINT
10- 4274 - 449 -44
11441
29.95
153593
05/22/86
60.40
MINNESOTA CLAY
INVEN SUPP
23- 1209 - 000 -00
05069
153593
05/22/86
14.25
_- MINNESOTA_CLAY
CRAFT SUPP
23 -4588- 616 -61
05071
153593
05/22/86
19.35
MINNESOTA CLAY ____ -
_
CRAFT SUPP
_
23- 4588 - 616 -61
04799
94.00
•
ttf -CKS
*
153618
05/22/86
43.95
MIDWEST EADGE
DONATION
23- 3265 - 000 -00
89972
43.95
• -
- - -- - -- ---- .. -
- - -- -
!f! ttf
153705
05/22/86
749.51
I B M
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 510 -51
749.51
•
153706
05/22/86
31.58
A PLUS PRESORT
POSTAGE
10 -4290- 510 -51
31.58
+
153707
05/22/86
19141.06
RECYCLING PLUS
CONT SERV
10- 4200 - 507 -50
6226
19141.06
153708
05/22/86
556.55
MANTEK
TWEED SPRAT
10 -4566- 642 -64
556.55
•
153709
05/22/8E
250.00
BOB SOBCOVIAK
CLEANING
23- 4200- 610 -61
250.00
•
yp
153710
05/22/86
50.00
JIM HEIDEMAN
MUSICIAN FOR SHOW
23 -4200- 610 -61
50.00
*
153711
05/22/86
35.00
DR JIM GRANT
6SPRINKLER REPAIR
10- 4200 - 318 -30
35.00
*
153712
05/22/86
188.80
SYLVESTER SCHWARTZ
CLOTHING REIN
10 -4266- 420 -42
188.80
•
yl'
153713
05/22/86
19876 -10
C W D C INDUST INC
LUMBER
10- 4604 - 260 -26
4560
19876.10
-
V� >�
153714
05/22/86
10.00
THE PRINT SHOP
OFFICE SUPP
10- 4516 - 510 -51
31334
^
•
1986 (
OF EDINA
CHECK 3TER
06 -02 -8t iGE 13
CHECK
NO. DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. t P.O. U MESSAGE
10.00
153715
05/22/86
95.55
RAFIX
EQUIP MAINT
10- 4274 - 420 -42
03
95.55
153716
05/22/86
36.85
MPH INDUSTRIES INC
EQUIP MAINT
10 -4274- 420 -42
14883
153716
05/22/86
132.10
MPH INDUSTRIES INC
EQUIP MAINT
10 -4214- 420 -42
14884
168.95
•
153717
05/22/86
192.62
SHERIFFS DEPT
ROOM B BOARD
10- 4286- 220 -22
192.62
•
153113
05/22/86
185.22
HILB ART SUPPLY
INVEN SUPP
23- 1209- 000 -00
185.22
+
153719
05/22/86
394.08
ART MATERIALS INC
INVEN SUPP
23- 1209 - 000 -00
394.08
153720
05/22/86
29399.98
VESSCO INC
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 805 -80
2298
2399.98
•
153721
05/22/86
140.00
INTERN CCNF OF BLDG
DUES
10- 4204- 490 -49
140.00
•
153722
05/22/86
39000.00
FRAZEE RESEARCH
CONT SERV
10- 4200 - 500 -50
3.000.00
•
i
153723
05/22/86
84.00
SAFEWAY STEEL PROD
EQUIP MAINT
27- 4226- 661 -66
R14021
84.00
•
153724
05/22/86
60.00
WODOLAKE LUTH CHURCH
REFUND
10- 3230 - 000 -00
60.00
•
153725
05/22/86
188.22
THERMEX CORP
CONT REPAIRS
28- 4248 - 708 -70
13587
188.22
•
153726
05/22/86
65.90
LYNDALE GARDEN CTR
GEN SUPP
10- 4504 - 646 -64
60224
65.90
•
153727
G5/28/86
102.95
NORCOSSTCO
6FIG SKATING
10 -2235- 000 -00
"j
153727
05/22/8.6_ _
32.85
NORCOSSTCO
FIG SKATING
10 -2235- 000 -00
129062
1 35.8 0
• -
- - - - -- - --
✓
153728
05/22/86
9.98
RADIO SHACK., -,__. __ -_ - ,_6EQUIP
MAINT
10- 42.14- 420 -42
9.98
•
_ 153729
_ -. _ 05/22/86
345.27_._____
ARTISTIC FLOORS _
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
j
153729
05/22/86
65.07
ARTISTIC FLOORS
REPAIR PARATS
10- 4540- 540 -54
153729
05/22/86
444.90
ARTISTIC FLOORS
CONST
27- 1300 - 000 -00
"j
855.24.
• -_
_ --
- _ _
v
153730
05/22/86
135.00
WEST WELD
GEN SUPP
10- 4504 - 560 -56
60541
153730
-- -
05/22/8-6 _
191.04
WEST WELD
TOOLS
10- 4580- 301 -30
60562
326.04
*
- -- - -
153731
_ 05/22/86
304.81
ITASCA -EQUIP CO _ . _._._.
REPAIR PARTS _...
_ 1.0- 4540 - 560 -56
60475
�r
L�
1996 CITY
OF EDINA
�' rrrrrr
CHECK REGISTER
153745
05/28/86
06 -02 -86 PAGE 14
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. 4 MESSAGE
�I 153749
304.81 r
,< 153749
05/28/86
153750
05/28/86
153732
05/22/86
328.32
WUNDER KLEIN DONOHUE
CONST
27- 1300 - 000 -00
24470
153732
05/22/86
8.16
WUNDER KLEIN DONOHUE
CONST
27 -1300- 000 -00
24629
381.90
336.48 r
REPAIR PARATS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
87155
387.90 •
153733
05/22186
134.00
K B K SALES
CONSTRUCTION
27 -1300- 000 -00
88335
153733
05/28/86
422.00
K B K SALES -
CONST
27 -1300- 000 -00
89286
196.88 •
556.00 *
- -
- - -- - --
163.50
NS CONCRETE COMPANY
rrrr.r
40 -4540- 801 -80
34711
* *► -CKS
153736
05/22/86
482.65
LAND CARE EQUIP
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
7668
153736
05/28/86
114.65
LAND CARE EQUIP
GEN SUPP
10 -4504- 646 -64
7764
597.30 •
- - -. _ _..... ..
153737
05/22/8E
- 98.00
NELSON RADIO COMM
CONT REPAIRS
10 -4248- 560 -56
13907
98.00 + - --
- - - - -- - - - - --
- -- - - -- - --
153738
05/22/86
91.20
SUPERIOR PLASTIC
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 813 -80
38475
91.20 •
-
153739
05/22/86
499.51
CONST FASTENING SYST
CONST
27 -1300- 000 -00
7385
499.51 -! - -
- -- - -- - -- -_ ._.__ -
153740
05/22/86
504.00
RETAIL DAJA SYSTEM
CONT REPAIRS
_0- 4248 - 841 -84
26757
504.00
_.
153741
05/22/86
55.00
-
-- JAMES W SINGLETON
-
MEETINGS
10- 4202- 440 -44
55.00 +
- -- - -
-- -
- 153742
05/22/86
243.14 ._.
CHAMPION INTERN
- - -- - --
GEN SUPP
27 -4504- 661 -66
i
243.14 *
- -- - -
~ 153743
05/22/8E
25.50
-
LIEN INFECTION
- - - --
CONT SERV
27- 4200 - 661 -66
a
25.50 r-
- - - -- - - --
- -- - - -- - - --
- -
�' rrrrrr
153745
05/28/86
153746
05/28/86
153747
I
05/28/86
153748
05/28/86
�I 153749
05/28/86
,< 153749
05/28/86
153750
05/28/86
v �
rrr -CKS
450.00
KUETENSKY NURSERY
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 390 -30
1266 '
450.00
256.40
LEJEUNE STEEL
CONST
27- 1300 - 000 -00
A4568
256.40 •
100.10
BRAEMAR QUICK PRINT
PRINTING
23 -4600- 610 -61
21796 '
100.10 •
381.90
INLAND TRUCK PARTS
REPAIR PARATS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
87155
387.90 •
65.03
DRESSER CONST
GEN SUPP
10- 4540 - 560 -56
00133
131.85
DRESSER CONST
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
00132
196.88 •
- -
-- - --
163.50
NS CONCRETE COMPANY
REPAIR PARTS
40 -4540- 801 -80
34711
t
'
1986
IF EDINA
CHECK R
TER
06 -02 -86 GE 15
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. 4 MESSAGE
153750
05/28/86
110.95
NS CONCRETE COMPANY
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 813 -80
24855 ,
274.45
•
153751
05/28/86
14.76
DITCH WITCH OF MN
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
094667 ,
14.76
•
'i
153752
05/28/86
282.75
ERIC ANDERSON
CONT SERV
10- 4200 - 500 -50
,
153752
05/28/86
43.47
ERIC ANDERSON
MILEAGE
MILEAGE—- - -
10- 4208-500 -50
326.22
•
- --
153753
05/28/86
60.00
ASSOC OF METRO -
- -
MEETING EXPENSES
10- 4206 - 100 -10
60.00
- - -
•
-_ - --
153754
05/28/86
255.00
_ - IBM--- ____ ,_. __-
- ---GEN N SUPP -_ _ - . - _ _ -
_., 10- 0504 - 510 -51
255.00
•
153755
05/28/86_
- 59838.68
- HENNEPIN COUNTY
B_BOARD
10 -4286- 220 -22
13335 ,
59838.68
-
•
- AROOM - -__
- - --
153756
05/28/86
9.00
RC- _IDENTIFICATINS
GEN SUPP__ - -
10- 4504- 420 -42
5292
9.00
•
153757
05/29/86
90.00
PTAC
TRAINING
10 -4202- 420 -42
153758
05/28/86
280.00
ROBERT.FUEGNER ___ -
-- -- 1/4 DRIVEWAY COST
40- 4248 - 803 -80
,
280.00
•
r
153759
05/29/86
44.00
_ - JEAN GRAPP -
MODELS
- --
23- 4588- 616 -61
44.00
•
- - --
153760
05/28/86
120.00
_- __MARION ALSTAD_
120.00
.
'
153761
05/28/86
19774.19
FEED RITE CONTROL
WATER
40 -4622- 805 -80
69902
19774.19
+ --
- -- - - - - -- - - - --
153762
05/28/86
76.00
_ G_EN _PARTS 8- SUPPLY_ ._
.. _REPAIR__PARTS ------
686316.
76.00
•
_________2_7-4540-_66I-66
153763
05/28/86
9.45
_ GLEN HARMON
SERVICES
10 -4120- 184- 18____
153763
05/28/86
1.05
-
GLEN HARMON
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 184 -18
I
10.50
•
153764
05/28/86
31.50
ROLAND LUNDBERG
SERVICES
10- 4120 - 184 -18
i„
31.50
•
153765
05/28/86
85.05
ALVIN W WOOD
SERVICES
10- 4120- 184 -18
85.05
•
153756
05/28/86
25.20
CHET ORNAi
SERVICES
10- 4120 - 184 -18
153766
05/28/86
10.08
CHET ORNAT
MILEAGE
10- 4208-184 -18
35.28
•
�-
W-
153767
05/28/86
20.48
ERNEST BUFFINGTON
SERVICES
10- 4120 - 184 -18
.
' 'I
1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -02 -86 PAGE 16
CHECK NO. DATE _ AMOUNT - VENDOR _ ITEM DESCRIPTION _ ACCOUNT NO._INV. # P.O. _# MESSAGE__ _
20.48 •
153768 05/28/86 6.30 SAM MOBLEY SERVICES 10 -4120- 184 -18
153763 05/28/86 1.89 SAM MOBLEY MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 184 -18
- 8.19 *
153769 05/28/86 360.00 MPLS 8 SUB SEWER 8 CONT REPAIRS 40- 4248- 803 -80 10413
153769 05/28/86 19560.00 - MPLS B SUB SEWER B CONT REPAIRS 40- 4248- 803 -80 10981
19920.00 • - - -. ._ ---
153710 05/28/86 408.15 AMSTAR INTERN GEN SUPPLIES 28 -4504- 708 -70 6597
408.15 . - -- - -- - - - - -- -- - -- - - -
153771 05/28/86 276.06 ROCHESTER MIDLAND CHEMICALS 28 -4564- 708 -70
276.06 ■ _. -. - - --
153772 05/28/86 - 50.00 M I A M A DUES 28- 4204 - 708 -70
- -
50.00 t - -. _- - -�- - - - - -- - -- - - -- -- -- --
153773 05/29/86 440.00 CHEMLAWN CONT SERV 10- 4200 - 642 -64
440.00 • - - - - - -- -
,. 153774 05/28/86 _ 80.00 _ _ PARK NICOLLET _ _ PHY EXAM 10- 4246 - 120 -12
153774 05/28/86 16.50 PARK NICOLLET PHY EXAM 10- 4246 - 440 -44
96.50 +
153175 05/28/96 71.00 ELEANOR YOUNG AMBULANCE REFUND 10 -3160- 000 -00
71.00 +
153776 05/28/86 137.79 LAWRENCE EDLUND AMBULANCE REFUND 10- 3180- 000 -00
137.79 •
153177 05/28/8E 20.00 KATHLEEN MUN6AVAN - • --- - -- -
CLASS REFUND 23- 3500 - 000 -00
L 20.00 •
a 153778 05/28/86 20.00 - NI 9- LORANG =SIEVE CLASS REFUNO _________23-3500-000-00___
20.00 * ,
153779 05/28/86 20.00 BETTY 'BERG---'- CLASS REFUND 23- 3500 - 000 -00
„'.•i 20.00 •
i I r 153780 05/28/86 40.00 -MARY LOU LOOHIS - CLASS kEFUND - 23 -3500- 000 -00
'i 40.00 +
153781 05/28/86 36.00 J04N HADGES - CLASS REFUND - 23- 3500 - 000 -06
i
36.00 * ,
G- - - - - - -- - - --
_ 153782 05/28/86 40.00 AUDRY BUCKLEY CLASS REFUND 23- 3500 - 000 -00 -
-�� i 40.00 • ,
153783 05/28/86 30.00 GERALDINE GIESE CLASS REFUND - - 23 -3500- 000 -00
30.00 •
h •
°- 153784 0328/86 2.50 JAN KARP CLASS REFUND 23- 3500 - 000 -00 -
i 12.50
1986 1 OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT
CHECK STER 06 -02 -8, AGE 17
VENDOR - _ -ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. q MESSAGE
?I 153785
05/28/86
15.00
-- VIRGINIA-BILLINGSLEY
CLASS REFUND
10- 4120- 184 -18
153795
05/28/86
15.00
r
- - -
_
10- 4208 - 184 -18
"I 153786
05/28/86 - - -
-- --15.00
BARBARA JOHANNESSEN
CLASS REFUND
23- 3500 - 000 -00
153796
05/28/86
15.00
+
SERVICES
- - - - -- - - --- - -
153787
05/28/86
22.50
KATHY,.ELM___ _
CLASS REFUND
23- 3500- 000 -00
22.50
+
153788
OS/28/8E
_ - - 13.50
__ -- M L GOODNUFF
CLASS REFUND
23 -3500- 000 700
153797_ --
05/28/8E
13.50
•
- - - --
-- - -
153789
05/28/86_
10.00
JUDITH SCHMIDT
CLASS REFUND
23- 3500- 000 -00
J
153798
05/28/86
10.00
+
SERVICES.._,_
10- 4120- 184 -18
"I 153790
05/28/86- -
- -- 43.49
- DONNA SKAGERBERG _ -_
POSTAGE
23- 4290 - 610 -61
'
43.49
*
-- ---
- -
153791
05/28/86
100.00
DONNA__GETSINGER_
INSTRUCTOR
23- 4100 - 614 -61
,.•I
100.00
153792
05/28/86
_ _ 245.00
PETER PE TERSE N__ --
AMB- ULANCE REFUND
10-3180-000-00
10- 4200 - 160 -16
245.00
+
- -__
153793
35/28/86
19310.00
J DEBE - -_ HE _ NSEL
- . _ _ . -_ -- _ _ .__ --
FIGSKATING
10- 2235 - 000 -00
19310.00
+
_153794
05/28/86
27.50
27 50
IMPRINTERS
PRINTING _
_ - --
40- 4600 - 800 -80 86 84
153795
05/28/86
248.85 --
__VIRGIL_ JOHNSON ._
SERVICES
10- 4120- 184 -18
153795
05/28/86
17.22
VIRGIL JOHNSON
MILEAGE
_
10- 4208 - 184 -18
_
266.07 +
153796
05/28/86
31.50
WM OTT
SERVICES
10 -4120- 184 -18
153796
05/28/86
5.25
WM OTT
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 184 -18
36.75
153797
05/28/85
323.40
FLORENCE NORBACK
SERVICES
10- 4200- 184 -18
153797_ --
05/28/8E
5.67_
- -- FLORENCE NORBACK
SERVICES
10- 4208- 184 -18
329.07 :
- --
- - - - - -- - - - --
J
153798
05/28/86
957.60 _
HOWARD NORBACK
SERVICES.._,_
10- 4120- 184 -18
153798
05/28/86
22.47
HOWARD NCRBACK
- _ _
MILEAGE
10 -4208- 184 -18
'
980.07 •
153799
_ 05/28/86
5.68
ROGER WALOIN
REFUND UTILITY BILL
40- 3525 - 000 -00 -
,.•I
5.68
153800
05/28/86
175.00
GOVT FINANCE
DUES
10- 4200 - 160 -16
175.00 •
153801
'I
05/28/86
230.00
EMPLOYEES CLUB
SUPPIES
--
10 -4504- 506 -50
230.00 *
frfrrr
156047 05/28/86
3y� I
1986 CITY
OF EDINA
TOTAL
CHECK REGISTER
05/28/86
- FUND
06 -02 -86 PAGE 18
TOTAL
�[ I
rrrftr
FUND
i
156248
95/28/86
29542.87
FUND
CHECK NO.
DATE -- _-
_ AMOUNT
- - --
-- VENDOR -- - _ --
ITEM DESCRIPTION
p P.O. p MESSAGE
ACCOUNT N0. INV. ------
-- -U --- - - --- .
L,
i
�' „�
r►rrtr
FUND
26
156516
05/28/86
ji
FUND
153802
05/28/86
- 57.00
EDNA SANFILIPPO
- - -- - --
REFUND TREE TRIM
15- 1111 - 008 -18
TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER FUND
720.78
FUNO
57.00
* -
- -
2159690.46
FUND
40
TOTAL
UTILITY FUND
153803
05/28/86 - _
--
- 242.90
_ HENNEPIN COUNTY MED
- --
1ST AID SUPP
10- 4510- 440 -44
4495
242.90
-
- - - - -- -
153304
05/28/86
402.50
- PHYSIO CONTROL
- --
CONT SERV
10 -4200- 440 -44
620154
402.50
- - -
,
153805
05/28/86
430.00
DONS APPLIANCE 8 TV
- - -- - - -
CAPITAL OUTLAY
10- 4900 - 440 -44
430. 0 0
- -- - - -- - --
- --
153806
05/28/86
108.91
ROAD RESCUE
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
R16240
108.91
r _.. - - - -- - - --
153807
05/28/86
_ _ 35.00
- JERRYS TOWING
CONT SERV
10 -4200- 560 -56
35.00
t
- - - - -- - - -- -
--
frfrrr
156047 05/28/86
3y� I
rfffff
10
TOTAL
155148
05/28/86
- FUND
12
TOTAL
�[ I
rrrftr
FUND
i
156248
95/28/86
29542.87
FUND
23
TOTAL
ART CENTER
29811.50
FUND
156445
05/28/86
i
�' „�
r►rrtr
FUND
26
156516
05/28/86
ji
FUND
27
TOTAL
GOLF COURSE FUND
20_9_114.48
FUND
28
TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER FUND
720.78
FUNO
29
TOTAL
GUN RANGE FUND
2159690.46
FUND
40
TOTAL
UTILITY FUND
28.89 BROWN PHOTO PHOTO SUPPLIES 10- 4508 - 440 -44 617615
28 -89
170.55 -ELYIN SAFEfY SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 646 -64
170.55 •
174.61 MARMON GLASS _ CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 111171
174.51 * - -...
239.10
239.10
PAPER CALMENSON B CO
PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 16227
313.16 - SEARS ROEBUCK TOOL
313.16 *
2509186.94
FUND
10
TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
2259000.00 -
- FUND
12
TOTAL
SHARING FUND
522.04
FUND
15
TOTAL
_REVENUE
WORKING CAPITAL FUND
29542.87
FUND
23
TOTAL
ART CENTER
29811.50
FUND
2°
TOTAL,--
CAPITAL FUND
19507.45
FUND
26
TOTAL -
_
_ SWIMMING POOL FUND
319883.72
FUND
27
TOTAL
GOLF COURSE FUND
20_9_114.48
FUND
28
TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER FUND
720.78
FUNO
29
TOTAL
GUN RANGE FUND
2159690.46
FUND
40
TOTAL
UTILITY FUND
0 -4580- 440 -44 -
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
** *-CKS
* ** -CKS
1906 C OF EDINA
CHECK F
TER
06 -02 -86 GE 19
C�ECK N0. _DATE _ -_ AMOUNT —__
_VENDOR
DESCRIPT
ACCOUNT NO. INV. N_P.O.-p_ MESSAGE _____-
_ITEM -ION _
879941.44
FUND 50
TOTAL
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
709045.45
FUND 60
TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION FUND
2609386.25
FUND 6E
TOTAL
IMP BOND REDEMPTION A2
9 1 69 9 353.38
— TOTAL
_
Ff,Y 'ENT
i
I ;
Hand typed checks: dl's 69476 - 78
- -- - - - -- -- -- - -
- - --
- -- - -- - -- - - - --
-69489 - - -90 --- - -- --
i
C I
Computer checks: 70581 thru 70787
_
1 I.
I