Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-10-20_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 20, 1986 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL MINUTES of HRA Meeting of October 6, 1986 approved as submitted or corrected by motion of seconded by I. AWARD OF BIDS - Phase'3 Condominium Waterproofing ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION - Paramedics Joel Radjenovich & Ron Samuelson MINUTES of the Regular Meetings of August 18 and September 8, 1986 approved as submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. All agenda items listed with an asterick ( *) are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Lot Divisions, Plats, Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required to pass. Final Plat Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/4 favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass. A. Zoning Change - R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -2 Planned Residence District - Generally located north of Crosstown Highway and east and north of Vernon Court - Robert Hansen B. Preliminary Plat Approval - Carroll Addition - Generally located west of Gleason Road and north of Valley View Road III. PUBLIC HEARING ON EASEMENT VACATION. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. * A. Vacation of Utility Easements - Lots 1, 2, 3 and 12, Block 1, Grandview Plateau (Contd from 10/6/86) (Continue to 11/3/86) IV. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS V. AWARD OF BIDS A. One (1) Sidewalk Plow * B. One (1) Combination Pick -up Street Sweeper VI. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS. A. Hennepin County Budget Report - Commissioner Keefe B. Approval of Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of 10/1/86 C. Proposed Fees & Charges for 1987 D. I -494 Corridor Study Update E. LMC 1987 Proposed City Policies and Priorities F. AMM Proposed 1987 -88 Legislative Policy G. Park Board Minutes of 10/14/86 H. 1987 Public Health Nursing Contract * I. Set Date - Canvass of City Election Returns (11/6/86 - 5:00 p.m.) VII. RESOLUTIONS A. Approval of Construction Cooperative Agreement - West 66th Street VIII. SPECIAL BUSINESS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL A. Concerns of Mayor and Council B. Discussion of Residential Land Use (Kelly Memorandum of 9/8/86) Agenda Edina City Council October 20, 1986 Page Two IX. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS X. FINANCE A. Payment of claims as per pre -list of 10/20/86: General Fund $465,940.80, Working Capital Fund $10.00, Art Center $3,601.40, Swimming Pool Fund $4,522.03, Golf Course Fund $31,167.00, Recreation Center Fund $9,360.48, Gun Range Fund $472.01, Utility Fund $22,850.63, Liquor Dispensary Fund $90,577.42, Construction Fund $427,235.00, IMP Bond Redemption Fund $306,699.00, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $316.72, /Total $1,362,752.49 and for confirmation of payment of the following claims dated 9/30/86: General Fund $781,836.60, Art Center $571.90, Swimming Pool Fund $2,972.19, j Golf Course Fund $12,838.92, Recreation Center Fund $6,668.63, Fun Range Fund $349.35, Utility Fund $30,170.87, Liquor Dispensary Fund $281,496.35, Total $1,116,904.81. i SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Mon' Nov 3 Regular Council Meeting Mon'- Nov 4. GENERAL /CITY ELECTION Tues Nov 11 Veterans Day - City Hall Closed Mon Nov 17 Regular Council Meeting Thurs Nov 27) i ) Fri Nov 28) Thanksgiving Holiday - City Hall Closed 7:00 p.m. Council Room 7:00 p.m. Council Room REQUEST FOR PURCHASE -TO: Edina HRA- FROM: Gordon Hughes VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: October 20, 1986 Material Description (General Specifications): Edinborough Condominiums Phase 3 Insulation - Quotations /Bids: Company 1. W. J. White Company 2. A. H. Bennet 3. N. Central Supply Department Recommendation: W. J. White Company ff fE (4-T Amount of Quote or Bid $5,100 $7,055 $5,992.50 Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is not epartment within the amount budget for the purchase. John Wallin, Finance Director City Manager's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE -TO: Edina HRA FROM: Gordon Hughes VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: October 20, 1986 Material Description (General Specifications): Edinborough Condominiums Phase 3 Waterproofing - Quotations /Bids: Company 1. Waterproofing by Experts 2. Underground Waterproofing, Inc. 3. Department Recommendation: Waterproofing by E: Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bi is is not Amount of Quote or Bid $15,000 $17,500 Dep r ment within the amount budget for the purchase. John Wallin, Finance Director City ager's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: Kenneth'Rosland, City Manager MINUTES EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OCTOBER 6, 1986 Answering rollcall were Commissioners, Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Courtney. MINUTES of the HRA Meetings of September 8 and 15, 1986, were approved as submitted by motion of Commissioner Bredesen, seconded by Commissioner Kelly. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. AWARD OF BIDS FOR EDINBOROUGH RESIDENTIAL AMENITIES PHASES 2 -5 AFFIRMED. Commissioner Bredesen made a motion to affirm award of bids for Edinborough Residential Amenities Phases 2 -5 to the following low bidders for the respective bid packages: Bid Package Low Bidder Amount Irrigation Green Acres Sprinkler Co. $ 22,193 Sodding & Landscaping Noble Nursery, Inc. 118,538 Asphaltic Paving Bituminous Roadways, Inc. 35,704 Concrete & Masonry Jesco,. Inc. 206,474 Carpentry & Finishes Lakeland Nursery 23,605 Electrical Electric Service Co. 54,851 Motion for affirmation of award of bids was seconded by Commissioner Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR EDINBOROUGH CONDOMINIUM DRAINS, PHASE 4. Manager Rosland advised that a sole bid for Edinborough Condominium Drains, Phase 4 had been received from Wenzel Mechanical at $11,400 and recommended award to Wenzel Mechanical, advising that they had been low bidder on the other three phases. Commissioner Bredesen's motion was seconded by Commissioner Turner for award of bid to Wenzel Mechanical at $11,400. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, the meeting was ,ad rued by motion of Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Tyner. MA i carried. Gordon L. Hug t�s Executive Director MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 18, 1986 Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards and Turner. Member Richards presided as Mayor Pro -Tem. AWARD OF BIDS - $4,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1986A, $2,500,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1986 AND $2,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1986B. The City Clerk presented affidavits showing publication of.the Notice of Sale of $4,000,000 General Obli- gation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1986A, $2,500,000 General Obligation Improve- ment Bonds, Series 1986 and $2,000,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1986B, of the City in the Edina Sun Current, the official newspaper of the City, and in Commercial West, as required by law and as directed by a resolution of the City Council adopted July 21, 1986. The affidavits were examined, found to comply_ with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475 and directed to be filed in the office of the City Clerk. It was reported that four sealed bids had been received by the City prior. to 7:00 PM., Central Daylight Time for the purchase of the Bonds in accordance with the Notice of Sale and Terms and Conditions of Sale. The bids have been opened, read and tabulated, and the terms of each have been determined to be as follows: Name of Bidder First National Bank of Minneapolis Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co. Harris Trust & Savings Bank Bid For Principal $8,338,500 $8,343,556 $8,377,940 Interest Rates 1987 -4.50% 1988 -4.90 1989 -5.20 1990 -5.40 1991 -5.60 1992 -5.80 1993 -6.00 1994 -6.20 1995 -6.40 1996 -6.60 1997 -6.70 1998 -6.75 1999 -6.80 2000 -6.90 2001 -7.00 2002 -7.00 2003 -7.00 2004 -7.00 2005 -7.00 2006 -7.00 1987 -4.50 1988 -5.00 1989 -5.25 1990 -5.50 1991 -5.70 1992 -5.90 1993 -6.10 1994 -6.30 1995 -6.45 1996 -6.60 1997 -6.70 1998 -6.80 1999 -6.90 2000 -7.00 2001 -7.05 2002 -7.10 2003 -7.15 2004 -7.20 2005 -6.75 2006 -6.75 1987 -4.50 1988 -5.00 1989 -5.25 1990 -5.50 1991 -5.70 1992 -6.10 1993 -6.10 1994 -6.30 1995 -6.50 1996 -6.60 1997 -6.70 1998 -6.80 Total Interest Cost - Net Average Rate $6,683,150 - 6.8933% $6,689,344 - 6.899787% $6,797,610 - 7.0114% 8/18/86 Bid For Interest Total Interest Cost - Name of Bidder Principal Rates Net Average Rate Harris Trust & Savings 1999 -6.90 Bank (contd) 2000 -7.00 2001 -7.10 2002 -7.20 2003 -7.25 2004 -7.25 2005 -7.25 2006 -7.25 The Northern $8,372,500 1987 -7.00 $8,169,925 - 8.42% Trust Co. 1988 -7.25 1989 -7.50 1990 -7.75 1991 -8.00 1992 -8.05 1993 -8.10 1994 -8.15 1995 -8.20 1996 -8.25 1997 -8.25 1998 -8.30 1999 -8.30 2000 -8.35 2001 -8.35 2002 -8.40 2003 -8.40 2004 -8.40 2005 -8.40 2006 -8.40 Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO $4,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1986A, $2,500,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1986 AND $2,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1986B; AWARDING THE SALE THEREOF BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) as follows: 1. This Council by a resolution adopted on July 21, 1986, authorized and deter -. mined to issue $4,000,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1986A, $2,500,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1986 and $2,000,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1986B of the City (together, the Bonds) and ordered that a public sale of the Bonds be held on this date. Notice of the.public sale of the Bonds was duly given as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60. In accordance with the Terms and Conditions of Sale, four sealed bids were received by the City prior to 7:00 o'clock P.M. on this date. Those bids have been opened, read and considered by this Council and the terms of each have now been determined. 2. The bid of First National Bank of Minneapolis, of Minneapolis, MN, and associates (the Purchaser), for the purchase of the Bonds on the terms set forth in the Terms and Conditions of Sale, at a price of $8,338,500 plus accrued interest from the date of the Bonds to the date of delivery thereof, the Bonds to bear interest at specified rates resulting in a net interest cost (determined by the addition of any discount to and the deduction of any premium from the total interest on all Bonds from their date to their stated maturity) of $6,683,150,1 which is the lowest net interest cost of all bids received pursuant to the Notice of Sale and the Terms and Conditions of Sale and is therefore declared to be the best bid received, and is hereby accepted. The Mayor and City Manager are her authorized and directed to execute a contract for the sale of the Bonds to the Purchaser in accordance with the terms of said bid, the Terms and Conditions of Sale and this resolution. 3. The City Manager shall retain the good faith check of the Purchaser, pursuant to the Terms and Conditions of Sale, and shall return the good faith checks of the unsuccessful bidders forthwith. 4. The Official Statement relating to the Bonds, prepared by the City, is approved, and its distribution to prospective bidders for the Bonds ratified. The City Manager is authorized,.in behalf of the City, to sign and deliver to the Purchaser a certificate as to the accuracy and completeness of the Official Statement. Attest: City Clerk Mayor Pro -Tem 8/18/86 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member Kelly, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Richards and the following voted against the same: None whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted and was signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk. Member Turner then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO $4,000,000 GENERAL.OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1986A; FIXING THE FORM AND DETAILS, PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY THEREOF AND THE SECURITY THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows: Section 1. Authorization and Sale. 1.01. Authorization. Pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.77(a) and 462.581 and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, the City Council of the City has authorized the issuance and sale of its General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1986A (the Bonds) in the principal amount of $4,000,000 for the purpose of providing funds for the payment of the public redevelopment costs needed for a redevelopment project (the Project), to be undertaken in accord- ance with the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, previously established by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Edina (the Authority) and approved by the City. $78,000 of the principal amount of the Bonds represents interest as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.56. For the payment of the Bonds the Authority has agreed to segregate and to pledge and appropriate tax increments resulting from redevelopment of a project area, designated as the Southeast Edina Project Area (the Project Area), as certified by the County Auditor of Hennepin County from year to year, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.585, Subdivision 4. 1.02. Outstanding Bonds. The City has previously issued its General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, dated October 1, 1981 in the principal amount of $4,500,000 (the 1981 Bonds) pursuant to a resolution duly adopted on October 5, 1981 (the 1981 Bonds Resolution) and its $12,000,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985, dated September 1, 1985 (the 1985 Bonds) pursuant to a resolution adopted on August 19, 1985 (the 1985 Bond Resolution). The 1981 Bonds and 1985 Bonds are general obligations of the City payable primarily from tax increments derived from the Project Area and are issued pursuant to the provisions of Minn- esota Statutes, Section 273.77. Pursuant to Section 4.04 of the 1981 Bond Resolu- tion the City reserved the right to issue additional bonds payable from the 1981 General Obligation Tax Increment Bond Fund (the Bond Fund) established pursuant to Section 4.02 of the 1981 Bond Resolution to finance costs of the project to be undertaken by the City within the Project Area pursuant to the Plan. 1.03. Project Costs. The cost of the Project is estimated to be $4,000,000. 1.04. Sale. This Council, by resolution adopted on August 18, 1986 accepted the bid of First National Bank of Minneapolis, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, and associates (the Purchaser), to purchase the Bonds at a price of $3,924,014.70 plus accrued interest from the date.of the Bonds to the date of delivery thereof, the Bonds to bear interest from August 1, 1986 until paid at the rates specified by the Purchaser and upon the further terms and conditions set forth in the Terms and Conditions of Sale. 1.05. Issuance of Bonds. All acts, conditions and things which are required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed prior to the issuance of the Bonds having been done, existing, and having happened, it is now necessary for this Council to establish the form and terms of the Bonds, to provide for the security thereof, and to issue the Bonds forthwith. Section 2. Form of Bonds. 2.01. Form of Bonds. The Bonds shall be prepared in substantially the following form: [Face of the Bond] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BOND, SERIES 1986A Date of Rate Maturity Original Issue CUSIP August 1, 1986 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS REGISTERED OWNER: PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: DOLLARS 8/18/86 THE CITY OF EDINA, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the City), acknowledges itself to be indebted and, for value received, hereby promises to pay to the registered owner above named, the principal amount indicated above, on the maturity date specified above, with interest thereon from the date hereof at the annual rate specified above, payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing February 1, 1987, to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month, all subject to the provisions referred to herein with respect to the redemption of the principal of this Bond before maturity. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal hereof, are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft of First Trust Company, Inc., in St. Paul, Minnesota, as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Bond Registrar), or its successor designated under the Resolution described herein. Additional provisions of this Bond are contained on the reverse hereof and such provisions shall for all purposes have the same effect as though fully set forth hereon. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall - have been executed by the Bond Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Edina, Hennepin 1 County, State of Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed by the facsimile signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager and by a printed facsimile of the official seal of the City and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the date set forth below. Dated: (Facsimile Signature) (Facsimile Signature) City Manager Mayor (Facsimile Seal) CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. First Trust Company, Inc., as Bond Registrar By Authorized Representative (Reverse of the Bonds] This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $4,000,000 (the Bonds), all of like date and.tenor except as to serial number, interest rate, redemption privilege and maturity date, issued pursuant to a resolution adopted on August 18, 1986 (the Resolution) for the purpose of providing moneys in aid of a redevelopment project to be undertaken in accordance with the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, in anticipation of the collection of tax increment resulting from the redevelopment of the Project Area, as certified annually by the County Auditor of Hennepin County, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.585, Subdivision 4; and is issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota thereunto enabling, including Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.581, Section 462.585, Section 273.77(a) and Chapter 475. This Bond is payable primarily from a portion of the moneys in the "1981 General Obligation Tax Increment Bond Fund" (the Bond Fund) of the City, but the City is required by law to pay maturing principal hereof and interest hereon from any available funds of the City if moneys on hand in the Bond Fund pledged to the payment of the Bonds are insufficient therefor. The Bonds are issuable only as fully registered bonds, in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities. Bonds maturing in the years 1989 through 1995 are payable on their respective stated maturity dates without option of prior payment, but Bonds having stated maturity dates in the years 1996 through 2006 are each subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City and in whole or in part, and if in part in inverse order of maturities and by lot, assigned in proportion to their principal amount, within any maturity, on February 1, 1996 and on any interest payment date thereafter, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, notice of the call for redemption will be published in a daily or weekly periodical, published in a Minnesota city of the first class or its metropolitan area, which circulates throughout the state and furnishes financial news as a part of its service, and will be mailed to the Bond Registrar and to 8/18/86 the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at his address appearing in the Bond Register, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond. Upon partial redemption of any Bond, a new Bond or Bonds will be delivered to the registered owner without charge, representing the remaining principal amount outstanding. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by his attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or his attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange, the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The City and the Bond Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City according to its terms have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed in regular and due form, time and manner; that all taxable property within the City is subject to the levy of a direct, annual, ad valorem tax, which the City covenants it will levy and which is required to be extended, assessed and collected for the years and in such amounts as may be required to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds of this issue when due, which levy is not limited as to rate or amount; and that the issuance of this Bond did not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to the applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM -- as tenants UNIF GIFT MIN ACT..... Custodian....... in common (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT -- as tenants by the entireties JT TEN -- as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act...................... (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used. ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE: NOTICE: The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or any change whatsoever. Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a commercial bank or trust company or by a brokerage firm having a membership in one of the major stock exchanges. 8/18/86 2.02 Form of Certificate. A certificate in substantially the following form Shall appear on the reverse side of each Bond, following a copy of.the text of the legal opinion of Bond Counsel: We certify that the above is a full, true and correct copy of the legal opinion rendered by Bond Counsel on the issue of the Bonds of the City of Edina which includes the within Bond, dated as of the date of delivery of and payment for the Bonds. (Facsimile signature) (Facsimile signature) City Manager Mayor Section 3. Bond Terms, Execution and Delivery. 3.01. Maturities, Interest Rates, Denominations, Payment. The City shall forthwith issue and deliver the Bonds, which shall be denominated "General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1986A" and shall be payable primarily from the Bond Fund created in Section 4.02 hereof. The Bonds shall be issuable in the denomination of $5,000 each or any integral multiple thereof, shall mature on February 1 in the years and amounts set forth below, and Bonds maturing in such years and amounts shall bear interest from date of issue until paid or duly called for redemption at the rates per annum shown opposite such years and amounts as follows: Year Amount Rate Year Amount Rate 1989 $ 50,000 5.20% 1998 $200,000 6.75% 1990 50,000 5.40 1999 200,000 6.80 1991 50,000 5.60 2000 200,000 6.90 1992 100,000 5.80 2001 250,000 7.00 1993 100,000 6.00 2002 250,000 7.00 1994 100,000 6.20 2003 250,000 7.00 1995 150,000 6.40 2004 550,000 7.00 1996 150,000 6.60 2005 600,000 7.00 1997 150,000 6.70 2006 600,000 7.00 The Bonds shall be issuable only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, shall be payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar described herein. 3.02. Dates; Interest Payment Dates. Each Bond shall be dated as of the last interest payment date preceding the date of authentication'to which interest on the Bond has been paid or made available for payment, unless (i) the date of. authentication is an interest payment date to which interest has been paid or, made available for payment, in which case such Bond shall be dated as of the date of authentication, or (ii) the date of authentication is prior to February 1, 1987 in which case such Bond shall be dated as of August 1, 1986. The interest on the Bonds shall be payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing February 1, 1987, to the owner of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not such day is a business day. 3.03. Registration. The City shall appoint, and shall maintain, a bond registrar, transfer agent and paying agent (the Registrar). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto shall be as follows: (a) Register. The Registrar shall keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar shall provide for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of any Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner, thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until such interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. Whenever any Bond is surrendered by the registered owner for exchange, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested byl the registered owner or the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing. (d) Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered upon any transfer or exchange shall, be promptly cancelled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When any Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the same until it is satisfied that the endorsement on such Bond or separate instrument of transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar shall incur no liability for its refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name any Bond is at any time registered in the bond register as the 8/18/86 absolute owner.of such Bond,,whether such Bond shall be overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on such Bond and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to any such registered owner or upon the owner's order shall be valid and effectural to satisfy and discharge the liability of the City upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes, Fees and Charges. For every transfer or exchange of Bonds, the Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case any Bond shall become mutilated or be lost, stolen or destroyed, the Registrar shall deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of any such mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in sub- stitution for any such Bond lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond lost, stolen or destroyed, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that such Bond was lost, stolen or destroyed, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar of an appro- priate_ bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it, in which both the City and the Registrar shall be named as obligees. All Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar shall be cancelled by it and evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the City. If the mutilated, lost, stolen or_ destroyed Bond has already matured or.been called for redemption in accordance with its terms, it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. 3.04. Appointment of Initial Registrar. The City hereby appoints First Trust Company, Inc., as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with First Trust Company, Inc., as Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, such corporation shall be authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove any Registrar upon thirty (30) days' notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar shall deliver all,cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar and shall deliver the bond register to the successor Registrar. On or before each principal or interest due date, without further order of this Council, the City Manager shall transmit to the Registrar from the Bond Fund described in Section 4.02 hereof, moneys sufficient for the payment of all principal and interest then due. 3.05. Redemption. Bonds maturing in the years 1989 through 1995 shall not be subject to redemption prior to maturity, but Bonds maturing in the years 1996 through 2006 shall each be subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City, in whole or in part, and.if in part, in inverse order of maturities and, within any maturity, in $5,000 principal amounts selected by the Registrar by lot, on February 1, 1996 and on any interest payment date thereafter at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, the City Manager shall cause notice of the call for redemption to be published in a daily or weekly periodical published in a Minnesota city of the first class or its metropolitan area, which circulates throughout the state and furnishes financial news as a part of its service, and to be mailed to the Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. 3.06 Preparation and Delivery. The Bonds shall be prepared under the direction of the City Manager and the City Finance Director - Treasurer and.shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager, and shall be sealed with the official corporate seal of the City; provided that said signatures and the corporate seal may be printed, engraved, or lithographed facsimiles thereof. In case any officer whose signature, or a facsimile of whose signature, shall appear.on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of any Bond, such signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if such officer had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, no Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on such Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this resolution. When the Bonds have been so executed and authenticated, they shall be delivered by the City 8/18/86 Manager to the purchaser thereof upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the purchaser shall not be obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. Section 4. Security Provisions. 4.01. Construction Fund. A Construction Fund is hereby created, as a special fund and designated on the books of the City as the "Southeast Edina Redevelop- ment Area Construction Fund" (the Construction Fund), to be held and admini- stered by the City Finance Director - Treasurer separate and apart from all other funds of the City. The City hereby appropriates to the Construction Fund all of the proceeds received from the sale of the Bonds, less the amount to be deposited in the Bond Fund, as hereinafter defined, pursuant to Section 4.02 hereof. Moneys on hand in the Construction Fund from time to time shall be used solely to pay public redevelopment costs in connection with the Project as set forth in the Plan, as amended. Any amounts remaining in the Construction Fund upon completion of the Project and payment of all of the costs thereof shall be transferred to the Bond Fund. 4.02. Bond Fund. The principal and interest on the Bonds shall be payable from the Bond Fund. So long as any of the 1981 Bonds, the 1985 Bonds, the Bonds, or any additional bonds issued pursuant to Section 4.04 of the 1981 Bond Resolution and made payable from the Bond Fund, are outstanding and any principal thereof or interest thereon unpaid, the City Finance Director - Treasurer shall maintain the Bond Fund as a separate and special account to be used for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the 1981 Bonds, the 1985 Bonds, the Bonds and any additional bonds issued pursuant to Section 4.04 of the 1981 Bond Resolution and made payable from the Bond Fund. The City hereby irrevocably appropriates to the Bond Fund (a) the proceeds of the Bonds representing capitalized interest, (b) the accrued interest and any amount in excess of $3,922,000 bid for the Bonds and received from the Purchaser upon delivery of the Bonds, and (c) any other moneys appropriated or pledged'by the terms of this Resolution to the Bond Fund. 4.03. Full Faith and Credit Pledged. The full faith and credit and taxing power of the City are hereby irrevocably pledged for the - prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds and on all other bonds' made payable from the Bond Fund, as such principal and interest become due. , It is estimated that the tax increment revenue and other funds herein pledged for the payment of the Bonds will be collected in amounts not less than five! percent in excess of the amounts needed to meet when due the principal of and interest on the 1981 Bonds, the 1985 Bonds and the Bonds as required by Minne- sota Statutes, Section 475.61. Consequently, no ad valorem taxes are now levied to pay the Bonds or the interest to come due thereon, pursuant to Minnesota.Statutes, Section 273.77(a). If the money on hand in the Bond Fund should at any time be insufficient to pay principal and interest due on all bonds payable therefrom, such amounts may be paid from any other fund of the City and such other fund shall be reimbursed therefor when sufficient moneys' are available in the Bond Fund. If on October 1 in any year the sum of the balance in the Bond Fund plus the amount of tax increment revenue collectible through the end of the following calendar year is not sufficient to pay when, due all principal and interest to become due on all bonds payable therefrom in the following calendar year, or the Bond Fund has incurred a deficiency in the manner provided in this Section 4.03, a direct, irrepealable, ad valorem tax shall be levied on all taxable property within the corporate limits of the City for the purpose of restoring such accumulated or anticipated deficiency in accordance with the provisions of this Resolution. Section 5. Defeasance. When all of the Bonds have been discharged as provided in this Section 5, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this Resolution to the holders of the Bonds shall cease. The City may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds which are due on any date by irrevocably depositing with the paying agent on or before that date a sum' sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or, if any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the paying agent a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued to the date of such deposit. The City may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a bank qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose,; cash or securities which are general obligations of the United States or securities of United States agencies which are authorized by law to be so deposited, bearing interest payable at such time and at such rates and maturing on such dates as shall be required, without reinvestment, to pay all principal and interest to become due thereon to maturity. Section 6. Registration, Certification of Proceedings, Investment of Moneys and Arbitrage. j 6.01. Registration. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the County Auditor of Hennepin County, together with such other information as he shall require, and to obtain from! said County Auditor a certificate that the Bonds have been entered on his bond 8/18/86 register as required by law. 6.02. Certification of Proceedings. The officers of the City and the County Auditor of Hennepin County are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser an 'to Dorsey & Whitney, Bond Counsel, certified.copies of all proceedings and records of the City, and such other affidavits, certifi- cates and information as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the facts recited therein. 6.03. Covenant. The City covenants and agrees with the holders from time to time of the Bonds that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any action which would cause the interest on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended (the Code), and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder (the Regulations) as existing on the date of issuance of the Bonds, and covenants to take any and all actions within its powers to ensure that the interest on the Bonds will not become subject to taxation under the Code and the Regulations as existing on the date of issuance of the Bonds. In particular, the City covenants that it shall not take any action or exercise any remedies pursuant to any re- development agreement or other agreement with respect to any property in the District, if the effect thereof would be, in the opinion of the City's bond counsel, to cause the Bonds to be considered "industrial development bonds" or "consumer loan bonds" pursuant to the Code. 6.04. Arbitrage.. The Mayor and City Manager, being the officers of the City charged with the responsibility for issuing the Bonds pursuant to this resolution, are authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the Purchaser a certificate in accordance with the provisions of Section 103(c) of the Code, and Treasury Regulations, Sections 1.103 -13, 1.103 -14 and 1.103 -15, stating the facts, estimates and circumstances in existence on the date of issue and delivery of the Bonds which make it reasonable to expect that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of the Code and Regulations. . Section 7. Pending Federal Tax Legislation. 7.01. Tax Reform Bill. This Council understands that on December 17, 1985, the United States House of Representatives passed H.R. 3838 (the Tax Reform Bill), which, among other things, includes substantial additional requirements which must be satisfied by the issuers of municipal obligations (including obligations of the character of the Bonds) in order that the interest on such obligations be and remain exempt from federal income taxation. In their current form, the pro- visions of the Tax Reform Bill apply to municipal obligations issued after December 31, 1985.. On March 14, 1986, the Chairmen and Ranking Members of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Ways and Means and the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance and the Secretary of Treasury issued a Joint Statement on the Effective Dates of Pending Tax Reform Legislation (the Joint Statement). The Joint Statement endorses postponement (until September 1, 1986, or the date of enactment of tax reform legislation, whichever is earlier) of the effective date of certain provisions and restrictions of the Tax Reform Bill applicable to certain municipal obligations, including the Bonds. Such provisions and restrict- ions of the Tax Reform Bill include the definition of "nonessential function" bonds, new arbitrage restrictions, restrictions on the early issuance of bonds and information reporting "requirements. The Joint Statement is a statement of intent only and is not binding on Congress. The municipal bond market, however, appears to have accepted an issue of municipal obligations where the issuer has not covenanted to comply with those provisions of the Tax Reform Bill covered by the Joint Statement. To enhance the marketability of the Bonds, this Council has determined it to be necessary and desirable and in the best interests of the City to structure the Bonds and the application of the proceeds thereof in a manner so as to comply with the requirements of the Tax Reform Bill interpreted in accordance with the Joint Statement and, to use the best efforts of the.City to comply, if possible, with the requirements of the Tax Reform Bill as finally enacted, assuming that, as finally enacted, it would apply to the Bonds. 7.02. Covenants; Reliance on Joint Statement. The City covenants and agrees with the owners from time to time of the Bonds that it will take, and will cause its officers, employees or agents to take, all actions necessary to comply with the Tax Reform Bill, and that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any actions that would cause interest on the Bonds to become subject to federal income taxation under the Tax Reform Bill, until the Tax Reform Bill is enacted or the 99th Congress adjourns sine die without enactment of the Tax Reform Bill. In addition, the City covenants and agrees with the owners from time to time of the Bonds that if the Tax Reform Bill is enacted and its provisions are applicable to the Bonds, that the City, to the extent it is authorized by law, will use its best efforts to take, and to cause its officers, employees and agents to take, all actions necessary to comply 8/18/86 with the Tax Reform Bill as enacted, and that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any action which would cause interest on the Bonds to become subject to federal income taxation under the provisions of the Tax Reform Bill as enacted. In reliance on the Joint State- ment, however, the covenants of the City contained in this Section 7.02 to comply with the Tax Reform Bill as passed by the U.S. House of Representatives or as finally enacted do not include compliance with those provisions of the Tax Reform Bill the effective dates of which are postponed by the Joint State- ment. The City covenants that if, notwithstanding the Joint Statement, such provisions are applicable to the Bonds, the City will use its best efforts to comply, to the extent then possible, with such provisions, but no assurance ; can be given that such compliance would then be possible. 7.03. Proposed Interest Disallowance. The City hereby designates the Bonds as "qualified tax - exempt obligations" for purposes of Section 802(e) of the Tax Reform Bill relating to the disallowance of interest expenses for financial institutions. 7.04. Amendment of Resolution. The City reserves the right to amend or modify the provisions of Section 7.02, if and to the extent that the City receives an opinion of-nationally recognized bond counsel that such amendment or modifi- cation will not adversely affect the exemption from federal income taxation of the interest on the Bonds under then existing laws or regulations or the Tax Reform Bill. ATTEST: Mayor Pro -Tem The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member Kelly, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and the following voted against the same: None whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, and was signed by the Mayor, which signature was attested by the City Clerk. Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO $2,500,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1986; FIXING THE FORM AND DETAILS, PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY THEREOF AND THE SECURITY THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. Authorization. This Council has heretofore ordered various local improvement projects (the Improvements), to be constructed within the City under and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The present estimated totai cost of the Improvements not paid or to be paid from funds of the City avail- able for such purpose is $2,500,000. 1.02. Sale. Pursuant to a resolution adopted July 21, 1986 (the Resolution), this Council determined to issue and sell $2,500,000 principal amount of General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1986, of the City (the Bonds) to defray the expense incurred and estimated to be incurred by the City in making the j Improvements, including every item of cost of the kinds authorized in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.65, and $49,000 representing interest as provided in ' Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.56. Pursuant to the Resolution, a public sale of the Bonds was held on August 18, 1986 and this Council, by resolution adopted on that date, accepted the bid of First National Bank of Minneapolis, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, and associates (the Purchaser), to purchase the Bonds' at a price of $2,452,519.60 plus accrued interest from the date of the Bonds. to the date of delivery thereof, the Bonds to bear interest from August 1, 19,86 until paid at the rates specified by the Purchaser and upon the further terms and conditions set forth in the Terms and Conditions of Sale. 1.03. Issuance of Bonds. All acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed prior to the issuance of the Bonds have been done, do exist, have happened, and have been performed, wherefore it.is now necessary for this Council to establish the form and terms of the Bonds, to provide for, the security thereof, and to issue the Bonds forthwith. 1.04. Maturities. This Council finds and determines that the maturities of the Bonds, as set forth in Section 3.01 hereof, are warranted by the anticipated collection of the assessments to be levied for the cost of the Improvements. Section 2. Form of Bonds. 2.01. Form of Bonds. The Bonds shall be prepared in substantially the following form: 8/18/86 [Face of Bonds] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BOND, SERIES 1986 Date of Rate Maturity Original Issue CUSIP August 1, 1986 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS REGISTERED OWNER: PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: DOLLARS THE CITY OF EDINA, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the City), acknowledges itself to be indebted and, for value received, hereby promises to pay to the registered owner above named, the principal amount indicated above, on the maturity date specified above, with interest thereon from the date hereof at the annual rate specified above, payable on February l and August 1 in each year, commencing February 1, 1987,,to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month, all subject to the provisions referred to herein with respect to the redemption of the principal of this Bond before maturity. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal hereof, are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft of First Trust Company, Inc., in St. Paul, Minnesota, as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Bond Registrar), or its successor designated under the Resolution described herein. Additional provisions of this Bond are contained on the reverse hereof and such provisions shall for all purposes have the same effect as though fully set forth hereon. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Bond Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Edina, Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed by the facsimile signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager and by a printed facsimile of the official seal of the City and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the date set forth below. Dated: (Facsimile Signature) (Facsimile Signature) City Manager Mayor (Facsimile Seal) CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. FIRST TRUST COMPANY, INC., as Bond Registrar By Authorized Representative [Reverse of the Bonds] This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $2,500,000 (the Bonds), all of like date and tenor except as to serial number, interest rate, redemption privilege and maturity date, issued to pay the cost of construction of local improvements in the City (the Improvements), and is issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota thereunto enabling, including Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 429 and 475. This Bond is payable primarily from the 1986 Improvement Bond Fund (the Fund) of the City, but the City is required by law to pay maturing principal hereof and interest thereon out of any funds in the treasury if moneys on hand in the Fund are insufficient therefor. The Bonds are issuable only as fully registered bonds, in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, of single maturities. 8/18/86 The Bonds maturing in the years 1987 through 1995 are payable on their respective stated maturity dates without option of prior payment, but Bonds having stated maturity dates in 1996 are each subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City and in whole or in part, and if in part by lot, assigned in proportion to their principal amount on February 1, 1996, at a price equal to the principal amount to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, notice of the call for redemption will be published in a daily or weekly periodical, published in a Minnesota city of the first class or its metropolitan area, which circulates throughout the state and furnishes financial news as a part of its service, and will be mailed to the Bond Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at his address appearing in the Bond Register, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond. Upon partial redemption of any Bond, a new Bond or Bonds will be delivered to the registered owner without charge, representing the remaining principal amount outstanding. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by his attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or his attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange, the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The City and the Bond Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to j exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the ! ! issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City according to its terms have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed as so required; that prior to the issuance hereof the City has levied or agreed to levy special assessments on property specially benefited by the Improvements and ad valorem taxes on all taxable property within the City, collectible in the years and amounts required to produce sums not less than 5% in.excess•of the principal of and interest on the Bonds as such principal and interest respectively become due, and has appropriated the same to the Fund in the manner specified in Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.091, Subdivision 4; that, to take care of any accumulated or anticipated deficiency in the Fund, additional ad valorem taxes are required by law to be levied upon all taxable property in the City without limitation as to rate or amount; and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according-to the applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM -- as tenants UNIF GIFT MIN ACT..... Custodian..... in common (Gust) (Minor) TEN ENT -- as tenants by the entireties under Uniform Gifts to JT TEN -- as joint tenants Minors with right of survivorship and Act ...................... not as tenants in (State) common Additional abbreviations may also be used. 8/18/86 ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER NOTICE: The signature to this OF ASSIGNEE: assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or any change whatsoever. Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a commercial bank or trust company or by a brokerage firm having a membership in one of the major stock exchanges. 2.02. Form of Certificate. A certificate in substantially the following form shall appear on the reverse side of each Bond, following a copy of the text of the legal opinion of Bond Counsel: We certify that the above is a full, true and correct copy of the legal opinion rendered by Bond Counsel on the issue of Bonds of the City of Edina which includes the within Bond, dated as of the date of delivery of and payment for the Bonds. (Facsimile signature) (Facsimile signature) City Manager Mayor Section 3. Bond Terms, Execution and Delivery. 3.01. Maturities, Interest Rates, Denominations, Payment. The City shall forthwith issue and deliver the Bonds, which shall be denominated "General Obliga- tion Improvement Bonds, Series 1986" and shall be payable primarily from the 1986 Improvement Bond Fund created in Section 4.02 hereof. The Bonds shall be issuable in the denomination of $5,000 each or any integral multiple thereof, shall mature on August 1 in the years and amounts set forth below, and Bonds maturing in such years and amounts shall bear interest from date of issue until paid or duly called for redemption at the rates per annum shown opposite such years and amounts as follows: Year Amount Rate Year Amount Rate 1987 $250,000 4.50% 1992 $250,000 5.80% -1988 250,000 4.90 1993 250,000 6.00 1989 .250,000 5.20 1994 250,000 6.20 1990 250,000 5.40 1995 250,000 6.40 1991 250,000 5.60 1996 250,000 6.60 The Bonds shall be issuable only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, shall be payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar described herein. 3.02. Dates; Interest Payment Dates. Each Bond shall be dated as of the last interest payment date preceding the date of authentication to which interest on the Bond has been paid or made available for payment, unless (i) the date of authentication is an interest payment date to which interest has been paid or made available for payment, in which case such Bond shall be dated.as of the date of authentication, or (ii) the date of authentication is prior to February 1, 1987 in which case such Bond shall be dated as of August 1, 1986. The interest on the Bonds shall be payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing February 1, 1987, to the owner of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not such day is a business day. 3.03. Registration. The City shall appoint, and shall maintain, a bond registrar, transfer agent and paying agent (the Registrar). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto shall be as follows: (a) Register. The Registrar shall keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar shall provide for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of any Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the.Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until such interest payment date. 8/18/86 (c) Exchange of Bonds. Whenever any Bond is surrendered by the registered owner for exchange, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver one or more new.Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by' the registered owner or the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing. (d) Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered upon any transfer or exchange shall be promptly cancelled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When any Bond is presented to the'. Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the same until it is satisfied that the endorsement on such Bond or separate instrument of transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar shall incur no liability for its refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper of unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name any Bond is at any time registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of such Bond, whether such Bond shall be overdue.or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on such Bond and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to any such registered owner or upon the owner's order shall be valid and effectural to satisfy and discharge the liability of the City upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes, Fees and Charges. For every transfer or exchange of Bonds, thee, Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case any Bond shall become mutilated or be lost, stolen or destroyed, the Registrar shall deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of any such mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in sub- stitution for any such Bond lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges,of the Registrar in connection therewith; and', in the case of a Bond lost, stolen or destroyed, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that such Bond was lost, stolen or destroyed, ' and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar of an appro- priate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it, in which both the City and the Registrar shall be named as obligees. All Bonds so surrendered,to the Registrar shall be cancelled by it and evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the City. If the mutilated, lost, stolen or: destroyed Bond has already matured or. been called for redemption in accordance with its terms, it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. 3.04. Appointment of Initial Registrar. The City hereby appoints First Trust Company, Inc., as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and the City Manager are authorized -to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with First Trust Company, Inc., as Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, such corporation shall be authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove any Registrar upon thirty (30) days' notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event ttie predecessor Registrar shall deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar' and shall deliver the bond register to the successor Registrar. On or before' each principal or interest due date, without further order of this Council, the City Manager shall transmit to the Registrar from the 1986 Improvement Bond Fund described in Section 4.02 hereof, moneys sufficient for the payment of -all principal and interest then due. 3.05. Redemption. The Bonds maturing in the years 1987 .through 1995 shall not be subject to redemption prior to maturity,. but Bonds maturing in 1996 shall each be subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City, in whole or in part, and if in part, in $5,000 principal amounts selected by the Registrar, by lot, on February 1, 1996 at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, the City Manager shall cause notice of the call for redemption to be published in a daily or weekly periodical published in a.Minnesota city of the first class or its metropolitan area, which circulates throughout the state and furnishes financial news as a part of its service, and to be mailed to the Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of .proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. 3.06. Preparation and Delivery. The Bonds shall be prepared under the direction of the City Manager and City Finance Director - Treasurer and shall bej executed on behalf of the City by the signature of the Mayor and City Manager, and shall be sealed with the official corporate seal of the City; provided that said signatures and the corporate seal may be printed, engraved, or lithographed 4 8/18/86 facsimiles thereof. In case any officer whose signature, or a facsimile of whose signature, shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of any Bond, such signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if such officer had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, no Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on such Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same.representative. The executed certificate of authentication on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this resolution. When the Bonds have been so executed and authenticated, they shall be delivered by the City Manager to the purchaser thereof upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the purchaser shall not be obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. Section 4.. Security Provisions. 4.01. 1986 Improvement Construction Fund. There is hereby.created a special bookkeeping fund to be designated as the "1986 Improvement Construction Fund" (hereinafter referred to as the Construction Fund), to be held and administered by the City Finance Director - Treasurer separate and apart from all other funds of the City. The City appropriates to the Construction Fund (a) the proceeds of the sale of the Bonds, and (b) all collections of special assessments levied for the Improvements until completion and payment of all costs of the Improvements. The Construction Fund shall be used solely to defray expenses of the Improvements, including but not limited to the transfer to the Bond Fund, created in Section 4.02 hereof, of amounts sufficient for the payment of interest and principal, if any, due upon the Bonds prior to the completion and payment of all costs of the Improve- ments and the payment of the expenses incurred by the City in connection with the issuance of the Bonds. Upon completion and payment of all costs of the Improve- ments, any balance of the proceeds of Bonds remaining in the Construction Fund may be used to pay the cost, in whole or in part, or any other improvements instituted pursuant to the Act, as directed by the City Council, but any balance of such proceeds not so used shall be credited and paid to the Bond Fund. 4.02. 1986 Improvement Bond Fund. So long as any of the Bonds are outstanding and any principal-of or interest thereon unpaid, the City Finance Director - Treasurer shall maintain a separate and special bookkeeping fund designated "1986 Improvement Bond Fund" (hereinafter referred to as the Bond Fund) to be used for no purpose other than the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds and on such other improvement bonds of the City as have been or may be directed to be paid therefrom. The City irrevocably appropriates to the Bond Fund (a) the collections of special assessments and other funds to be credited and paid thereto in accordance with the provisions of Section 4.01, (b) any taxes levied in accordance with this resolution, and (c) all such other moneys as shall be received and appropriated to the Bond Fund from time to time. If the balance in the Bond Fund is at any time insufficient to pay all interest and principal then due on all bonds payable therefrom, the payment shall be made from any fund of the City which is available for that purpose, subject to reimbursement from the Bond Fund when the balance therein is sufficient, and the Council covenants and agrees that it will each year levy a sufficient amount to take care of any accumulated or anticipated deficiency, which levy is not subject to any consti- tutional or statutory tax limitation. 4.03. Additional Bonds. The City reserves the right to issue additional bonds payable from the Bond Fund as may be required to finance costs of the Improvements not financed hereby; provided that the City Council shall, prior to the delivery of such additional bonds, levy or agree to levy by resolution sufficient additional special assessments and ad valorem taxes, if any, which, together with other moneys or revenues pledged for the payment of said additional obligations, will produce revenues at least five percent (5%) in excess of the amount needed to pay when due the principal and interest on all .bonds payable from the Bond Fund. The additional special assessments, ad valorem taxes and moneys.or revenues so pledged, levied or agreed to be levied shall be irrevocably appropriated to the Bond Fund in the manner provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61. 4.04. Levy of Special Assessments. The City hereby covenants and agrees that for payment of the cost of each of the Improvements it will do and perform all acts and things necessary for the full and valid levy of special assessments against all assessable lots, tracts and parcels of land benefited thereby and located within the area proposed to be assessed therefor, based upon the benefits received by each such lot, tract or parcel, in an aggregate principal amount not less than one hundred percent (100 %) of the cost of such Improvement. In the event that any such assessment shall be at any time held invalid with respect to any lot, piece or parcel of land, due to any error, defect or irregularity in any action or proceeding taken or to be taken by the City or this Council or any of the City's officers or employees, either in the making of such assessment or in the uerformance of any condition precedent thereto, the City and this Council 8/18/86 hereby covenant and agree that they will forthwith do all such further acts and take all such further proceedings as may be required by law to make such assessments.a valid and binding lien upon such property. 4.05. Full Faith and Credit Pledged. The full faith and credit of the City are irrevocably pledged for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and the interest on the Bonds, and the Bonds shall be payable from the Bond Fund in accordance with the provisions and covenants contained in this reso- lution. The interest on the Bonds to be paid on February 1, 1987 will be paid out of the proceeds of the Bonds and other moneys of the City available for such purpose. It is estimated that the special assessments levied and to be levied for the payment of the Improvements will be collected in amounts not less than five percent (5%) in excess of the annual principal and interest requirements of the Bonds. If the money on hand in the Bond Fund should at any time be insufficient for the payment of principal and interest.then due, this City shall pay the principal and interest out of any fund of the City, and such.other fund or funds shall be reimbursed therefor when sufficient money is available to the Bond Fund. If on October 1 in any year the sum of the balance in the Bond Fund plus the amount of special assessments thereto- fore levied for the Improvements and collectible through the end of the following calendar year is not sufficient to pay when due all principal and interest become due on all Bonds payable therefrom in said following calendar year, or the Bond Fund has incurred a deficiency in the manner provided in this Section 4.05, a direct, irrepealable, ad valorem tax shall be levied on all taxable property within the corporate limits of the City for the purpose of restoring such accumulated or anticipated deficiency in accordance with the provisions of this resolution. Section 5. Defeasance. When all of the Bonds and all coupons appertaining thereto have been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the holders of the Bonds shall cease. The City may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds and coupons appertaining thereto which are due on any date by depositing with the paying agent on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or; if any Bond or coupon.should not be paid when due, it may never- theless be discharged by depositing with the paying agent a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued to the date of such deposit. The City may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a bank qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities which are general obligations of the United States or securities of United States agencies which are authorized by law to be so deposited, bearing interest payable at such time and at such rates and maturing on such dates as shall be required, without reinvestment, to pay all principal and interest to become due thereon to maturity. Section 6. Registration, Certification of Proceedings, Investment of Moneys and Arbitrage. 6.01. Registration. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the County Auditor of Hennepin County, together with such other information as he shall require, and to obtain from the County Auditor a certificate that the Bonds have been entered on his bond register and that the tax required for the payment thereof has been levied and filed as required by law. 6.02. Certification of Proceedings. The officers of the City and the County Auditor of Hennepin County are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser, and to Dorsey & Whitney, Bond Counsel, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City, and such other affidavits, certificates and information as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the facts recited therein. 6.03. Covenant. The City covenants and agrees with the holders from time to time of the Bonds that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents, any action which would cause the interest on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended (the Code), and Regulations promulgated thereunder (the Regulations) as existing on the date of issuance of the Bonds, and covenants to take any and all actions within its powers to ensure that the interest on the Bonds will not become subject to taxation under the Code and Regulations as existing on the date of issuance of the Bonds. 6.04. Investment of Moneys on Deposit in Bond Fund. Unless and until -the regulations.under Sectin 103(c)'of the Code which have been promulgated by the InternalRevenue Service prior to the date hereof have been modified or amended in pertinent part, the City Manager shall ascertain monthly the amount on deposit 8/18/86 in the Bond Fund. If the amount on deposit therein ever exceeds by more than $375,000 the aggregate amount of principal and interest due and payable from the Bond Fund within 12 months thereafter plus a reasonable carryover amount not exceeding the greater of one year's earnings on the Bond Fund or one - twelfth of the annual debt service payable therefrom, such excess shall not be-invested except at a yield less than or equal to the yield on the Bonds, based upon their amount, maturities and interest rates on their date of issue, computed by the actuarial method. If any additional improvement bonds are ever issued and made payable from the Bond Fund pursuant to Section 4.03 hereof, the dollar amount in the preceding sentence shall be changed to equal fifteen percent (15 %) of the aggregate original principal amount of all bonds, including the Bonds, which are then outstanding and payable therefrom. The City reserves the right to amend the provisions of this Section 6.04 at any time, whether prior to or after the delivery of the Bonds, if and to the extent that this Council'determines that the provisions of this Section 6.04 are not necessary in order to assure that the Bonds are not arbitrage bounds under Section 103(c) of the Code and the applicable Regulations. 6.05. Arbitrage. The Mayor and City Manager, being the officers of the City charged with the responsibility for issuing the Bonds pursuant to this resolution, are authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the Purchaser a certificate in accordance with the provisions of Section 103(c) of the Code, and Treasury Regulations, Section 1.103 -13, 1.103 -14 and 1.103 -15, stating the facts, estimates and circumstances in existence on the date of issue and delivery of the Bonds which indicate that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of said Code and Regulations. Section 7. Pending Federal Tax Legislation. 7.01. Tax Reform Bill. This Council understands that on December 17, 1985, the United States House of Representatives passed H.R. 3838 (the Tax Reform Bill), which, among other things, includes substantial additional requirements which must be satisfied by the issuers of municipal obligations (including obligations of the character of the Bonds) in order that the interest on such obligations be and remain exempt from federal income taxation. In their current form, the pro- visions of the Tax Reform Bill apply to municipal obligations issued after December 31, 1985. On March 14, 1986, the Chairmen and Ranking Members of the . U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Ways and Means and the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance and the Secretary of Treasury issued a Joint Statement on the Effective Dates of Pending Tax Reform Legislation (the Joint Statement). The Joint Statement endorses postponement (until September 1, 1986, or the date of enactment of tax reform legislation, whichever is earlier) of the effective date of certain provisions and restrictions of the Tax Reform Bill applicable to certain municipal obligations, including the Bonds. Such provisions and restrict- ions of the Tax Reform Bill include the definition of "nonessential function" bonds, new arbitrage restrictions, restrictions on the early issuance of bonds and information reporting requirements. The Joint Statement is a statement of intent only and is not binding on Congress. The municipal bond market, however, appears to have accepted an issue of municipal obligations where the issuer has not covenanted to comply with those provisions of the Tax Reform Bill covered by the Joint Statement. To enhance the marketability of the Bonds, this Council has determined it to be necessary and desirable and in the best interests of the City to structure the Bonds and the application of the proceeds thereof in a manner so as to comply with the requirements of the Tax Reform Bill interpreted in accordance with the Joint Statement and, to use the best efforts of the City to comply, if possible, with the requirements of the Tax Reform Bill as finally enacted, assuming that, as finally enacted, it would apply to the Bonds. 7.02. Covenants; Reliance on Joint Statement. The City covenants and agrees with the owners from time to time of the Bonds that it will take, and will cause its officers, employees or agents to take, all actions necessary to comply with the Tax Reform Bill, and that it will not take or.permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any actions that would cause interest on the Bonds to become subject to federal income taxation under the Tax Reform Bill, until the Tax Reform Bill is enacted or the 99th Congress adjourns sine die without enactment of the Tax Reform Bill. In addition, the City covenants and agrees with the owners from time to time of the Bonds that if the Tax Reform Bill is enacted and its provisions are applicable to the Bonds, that the City, to the extent it is authorized by law, will use its best efforts to take, and to cause its officers, employees and agents to take, all actions necessary to comply with the Tax Reform Bill as enacted, and that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any action which would cause interest on the Bonds to become subject to federal income taxation under the provisions of the Tax Reform Bill as enacted. In reliance on the Joint State- ment, however, the covenants of the City contained in this Section 7.02 to comply with the Tax Reform Bill as passed by the U.S. House of Representatives or as finally enacted do not include compliance with those provisions of the 8/18/86 Tax Reform Bill the effective dates of which are postponed by the Joint State- ment. The City covenants that if, notwithstanding the Joint Statement, such provisions are applicable to the Bonds, the City will use its best efforts to comply, to the extent then possible, with such provisions, but no assurance can be given that such compliance would then be possible. 7.03. Proposed Interest Disallowance. The City hereby designates the Bonds as "qualified tax - exempt obligations" for purposes of Section 802(e) of the Tax Reform Bill relating to the disallowance of interest expenses for financial institutions. 7.04. Amendment of Resolution. The City reserves the right to amend or modify the provisions of Section 7.02, if and to the extent that the City receives an opinion.of nationally recognized bond counsel that such amendment or modifi- cation will not adversely affect the exemption from federal income taxation of the interest on'the Bonds under then existing laws or regulations or the Tax Reform Bill. ATTEST: Mayor Pro -Tem The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member_ Kelly, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor.thereof: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and the following voted against the same: None whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, and was signed by the Mayor, which signature was attested by the City Clerk. Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO $2,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1986B; FIXING THE FORM AND DETAILS, PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY THEREOF AND THE SECURITY THEREFOR BE IT.RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows: Section 1. Authorization and Sale. 1.01. Authorization. Pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.77(a) and 462.581 and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, the City Council of the City has authorized the issuance and sale of its General Obli- gation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1986B (the Bonds) in the principal amount of $2,000,000 for the purpose of providing funds for the payment of the public redevelopment costs needed for a redevelopment project (the Project), to be undertaken in accordance with the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan (the Rede- velopment Plan), previously established by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Edina (the Authority) and approved by the City. $39,000 of the principal amount of the Bonds represents interest as provided in Minnesota Statutes,.Section 475.56.. 1.02. Project Costs. The cost of the Project is estimated to be $2,000,000. 1.03. Expenditure of Tax Increment Revenue. The Project constitutes a "project" and -the District constitutes a "tax increment financing district" within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71 to 273.78, and thus the City has authority under said Sections 273.71 to 273.78 to expend ad valorem tax increments derived from the District to pay costs incurred or to be incurred by the City and the Authority in aid of the Redevelopment Project, or to pay the principal of and interest on bonds issued to finance such costs, in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan. 1.04. Computation of Tax Increment. The County Auditor of Hennepin County has certified to the Authority the Assessed Value of all taxable property in the District (the "Original Assessed Value "), and is to certify to the Authority in each year the then current Assessed Value of all taxable property in the District (the "Current Assessed Value "). The Current Assessed Value, less the Original Assessed Value is the Captured Assessed Value. The ad valorem taxes derived from the property in the District in each year, by application of the aggregate mill rate levied by all governmental entities having authority to levy taxes on such property to the Captured Assessed Value, is the Tax Increment to be derived from the District (the "Tax Increment "). 1.04. Sale. This Council, by resolution adopted on August 18, 1986 accepted the bid of First National Bank of Minneapolis, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, and associates (the Purchaser) , to purchase the Bonds at a price of $1,961,965.70 plus accrued interest from the date of the Bonds to the date of delivery thereof, the Bonds to bear interest from August 1, 1986 until paid at the rates specified by the Purchaser and upon the further terms and conditions set forth in the Terms and Conditions of Sale. 1.05. Issuance of Bonds. All acts, conditions and things which are required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed prior to the issuance of the Bonds having been done, 8/181,86 existing, and having happened, it is now necessary for this Council to establish the form and terms of the Bonds, to provide for the security thereof, and to issue the Bonds forthwith. ; ^.. Section 2. Form of Bon s. 2.01. Form of Bonds. The Bonds shall be prepared in substantially the following form: (Face of the Bond] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BOND, SERIES 1986B Date of Rate Maturity Original Issue CUSIP August 1, 1986 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS j REGISTERED OWNER: PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: DOLLARS THE CITY OF EDINA, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the City), acknowledges itself to be indebted and, for value received, hereby promises to pay to the registered owner above named, the principal amount indicated above, on the maturity date specified above, with interest thereon from the date hereof at the annual rate specified above, payable on February 1 and Ausust 1 in each year, commencing February 1, 1987, to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month, all subject to the provisions referred to herein with respect to the redemption of the principal of this Bond before maturity. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal hereof, are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft of First Trust Company, Inc., in St. Paul, Minnesota, as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Bond Registrar), or its successor designated under the Resolution described herein. Additional provisions of this Bond are contained on the reverse hereof and such provisions shall for all purposes have the same effect as though fully set forth hereon. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Bond Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Edina, Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed by the facsimile signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager and by a printed facsimile of the official seal of the City and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the date set forth below. Dated: (Facsimile Signature) (Facsimile Signature) City Manager Mayor (Facsimile Seal) CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. FIRST TRUST COMPANY, INC., as Bond Registrar By Authorized Representative (Reverse of the Bonds] This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $2,000,000 (the Bonds), all of like date and tenor except as to serial number, interest rate, redemption privilege and maturity date, issued pursuant to a resolution adopted on August 18, 1986 (the Resolution) for the purpose of providing moneys in aid of a redevelopment project to be undertaken in accordance with the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan, in anticipation of the collection of tax increment resulting from the redevelopment of the Project Area, as certified annually by the County Auditor of Hennepin County, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.76; and is issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota thereunto 8/18/86 enabling, including Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.581, Section 273.77(a) and Chapter 475. This Bond is payable primarily from a portion of the moneys in the "1986B General Obligation Tax Increment Bond Fund" (the Bond Fund) of the City, but the City is required by law to pay maturing principal hereof and interest hereon from any available funds of the City if moneys on hand in the Bond Fund pledged to the payment of the Bonds are insufficient therefor. The Bonds are issuable only as fully registered bonds, in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities. Bonds maturing in the years 1989 through 1995 are payable on their respective stated maturity dates without option of prior payment, but Bonds having stated maturity dates in the years 1996 through 2003 are each subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City and in whole or in part, and if in part in inverse order of maturities and by lot, assigned in proportion to their principal amount, within any maturity, on February 1, 1996 and on any interest payment date thereafter, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, notice of the call for redemption will be published in a daily or weekly periodical, published in a Minnesota city of the first class or its metropolitan area, which circulates throughout the state and furnishes financial news as a part of its service, and.will be mailed to the Bond Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at his address appearing in the Bond Register, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond. Upon partial redemption of any Bond, a new Bond or Bonds will be delivered to the registered owner without charge, representing the remaining principal amount outstanding. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by his attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or his attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds .of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange, the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The City and the Bond Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City according to its terms have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed in regular and due form, time and manner; that all taxable property within the City is subject to the levy of a direct, annual, ad valorem tax, which the City covenants it will levy and which is required to be extended, assessed and collected for the years and in such amounts as may be required to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds of this issue when due, which levy is not limited as to rate or amount; and that the issuance of this Bond did not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation. The following abbreviations, when used in'the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to the, applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM -- as tenants UNIF GIFT MIN ACT..... Custodian....... in common (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT -- as tenants by the entireties under Uniform Gifts to JT TEN -- as joint tenants Minors with right of survivorship and Act......... ........... not as tenants in (State) common Additional abbreviations may also be used. 8/,1,8/86 ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to transfe' t the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER NOTICE: The signature to this OF ASSIGNEE: assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or any change whatsoever. Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a commercial bank or trust company or by a brokerage firm having a membership in one of the major stock exchanges. 2.02. Form of Certificate. A certificate in substantially the following form shall appear on the reverse side of each Bond, following a copy of the text of the legal opinion of Bond Counsel: We certify that the above is a.full, true and correct copy of the legal opinion rendered by Bond Counsel on the issue of the Bonds of the City of Edina which includes the within Bond, dated as of the date of delivery of and payment for the Bonds. (Facsimile signature) (Facsimile signature) City Manager Mayor Section 3. Bond Terms, Execution and Delivery. 3.01. Maturities, Interest Rates, Denominations, Payment. The City shall forth- with issue and deliver the Bonds, which shall be denominated "General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1986B" and shall be payable primarily from the Bond Fund created in Section 4.02 hereof. The Bonds shall be issuable in the demoni- nation of $5,000 each or any integral multiple thereof, shall mature on August 1 in the years and amounts set forth below, and Bonds maturing in such years and amounts shall bear interest from date of issue until paid or duly called for redemption at the rates per annum shown opposite such years and amounts as follows: Year Amount Rate Year Amount Rate 1989 $ 50,000 5.20% 1997 $150,000 6.70% 1990 50,000 5.40 1998 150,000 6.75 1991 100,000 5.60 1999 150,000 6.80 1992 100,000 5.80 2000 150,000 6.90 1993 100,000 6.00 2001 200,000 7.00 1994 100,000 6.20 2002 200,000 7.00 1995 150,000 6.40- 2003 200,000 7.00 1996 150,000 6.60 The Bonds shall be issuable only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, shall be payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar described herein. 3.02. Dates; Interest Payment Dates. Each Bond shall be dated as of the last interest payment date preceding the date of authentication to which interest on the Bond has been paid or made available for payment, unless (i) the date of authentication is an interest payment date to which interest has been paid or made available for payment, in which case such Bond shall be dated as.of the date of authentication, or (ii) the date of authentication is prior to February 1, 1987 in which case such Bond shall be dated as of August 1, 1986. The interest on the Bonds shall be payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing February 1, 1987, to the owner of the record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not such day is a.business day. 3.03. Registration. The City shall appoint, and shall maintain, a bond registrar, transfer agent and paying agent (the Registrar). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto shall be as follows: (a) Register. The Registrar shall keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar shall provide for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of any Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until such interest payment date. 8/18/86 (c) Exchange of Bonds. Whenever any Bond is surrendered by the registered owner for exchange, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the registered owner or the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing. (d) Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered upon any transfer or exchange shall be promptly cancelled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When any Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the same until it is satisfied that the endorsement on such Bond or separate instrument of transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar shall incur no liability for its refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name any Bond is at any time registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of such Bond, whether such Bond shall be overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on such Bond and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to any such registered owner or upon the owner's order shall be valid and effectural to satisfy and discharge the liability of the City upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes, Fees and Charges. For every transfer or exchange of Bonds, the Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case any Bond shall become mutilated or be lost, stolen or destroyed, the Registrar shall deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of any such mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in sub- stitution for any such Bond lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond lost, stolen or destroyed, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that such Bond was lost, stolen or destroyed, and of the ownership thereof, and.upon furnishing.to the Registrar of an appro- priate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it, in which both the City and the Registrar shall be named as obligees. All Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar shall be cancelled by it and evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the City. If the mutilated, lost, stolen or_ destroyed Bond has already matured or. been called for redemption in accordance with its terms, it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. 3.04. Appointment of Initial Registrar. The City hereby appoints First Trust Company, Inc., as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with First Trust Company, Inc., as Registrar.. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, such corporation shall be authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove any Registrar upon thirty (30) days' notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar shall deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar and shall deliver the bond register to the successor Registrar. On or before each principal or interest due date_,.without further order of this Council, the City Manager shall transmit to the Registrar from the Bond Fund described in Section 4.02 hereof, moneys sufficient for the payment of all principal and interest then due. 3.05. Redemption. Bonds maturing in the years 1989 through 1995 shall not be subject to redemption prior to maturity, but Bonds maturing in the years 1996 through 2003 shall each be subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City, in whole or in part, and if in part, in inverse order of maturities and, within any maturity, in $5,000 principal amounts selected by the Registrar by lot, on February 1, 1996 and on any interest payment date thereafter at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to.the date of redemption. At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, the City Manager shall cause notice of the call for redemption to be published in a daily or weekly periodical published in a Minnesota city of the first class or its metropolitan area, which circulates throughout the state and furnishes financial news as a part of its service, and to be mailed to the Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. 3.06. Preparation and Delivery. The Bonds shall be prepared under the direction of the City Manager and the City Finance Director- Treasurer and shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager, and shall be sealed with the official corporate seal of the City; 8/18/86 provided that said signatures and the corporate seal may be printed, engraved, or lithographed facsimiles thereof. In case any officer whose signature, or a facsimile of whose signature, shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of any Bond, such signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if such officer had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, no Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on such Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this resolution. When the Bonds have been so executed and authenticated, they shall be delivered by the City Manager to the purchaser thereof upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the purchaser shall not be obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. Section 4. Security Provisions. 4.01. Construction Fund. A Construction Fund is hereby created, as a special fund and designated on the books of the City as the "Grandview Area Redevelopment Construction Fund" (the Construction Fund), to be held and administered by the City Finance Director Treasurer separate and apart from all other funds of the City. The City hereby appropriates to the Construction Fund all of the proceeds received from the sale of the Bonds, less the amount to be deposited in the Bond Fund, as hereinafter defined, pursuant to Section 4.02 hereof. Moneys on hand in the Construction Fund from time to time shall be used solely to pay public redevelopment costs in connection with the Project as set forth in the Plan, as amended. Any amounts remaining in the Construction Fund upon completion of the Project and payment of all of the costs thereof shall be transferred to the Bond Fund. 4.02. Bond Fund. The principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be payable from the 1986B General Obligation Tax Increment Bond Fund (the "Bond Fund "). So long as any of the Bonds or any additional bonds issued pursuant to Section 4.04 hereof and made payable from the Bond Fund, are outstanding and any principal thereof or interest thereon unpaid, the City Finance Director - Treasurer shall maintain the Bond Fund, as a separate and special account to be used for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds and on all other general obligation bonds now or hereafter issued by the City pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 273, to finance costs incurred by the City or the HRA in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan in aid of the Redevelopment Project and any other redevelopment project to be undertaken in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan. The City hereby irrevocably appropriates to the Bond Fund (a) the proceeds of the Bonds representing capitalized interest, (b) the accrued interest on the Bonds and any amount in excess of $1,961,000 bid for the Bonds and received from the Purchaser upon delivery of the Bonds, (c) the Tax Increments from the District appropriated and pledged by the Authority to the City to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds and any additional bonds payable from the Bond Fund, and (d) any other moneys appropriated or pledged by the terms of this Resolution to the Bond Fund. The City expressly reserves the right to use amounts in the Bond Fund (other than the amounts initially deposited therein upon the issuance of the Bonds) to finance or pay directly costs paid or incurred by the Authority or the City pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan in and of the Redevelopment Project and any other redevelopment project to be undertaken in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan. 4.03. Full Faith and Credit Pledged. The full faith and credit and taxing power of the City are hereby irrevocably pledged for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds and on all other bonds made payable from the Bond Fund, as such principal and interest become due. It is estimated that the Tax Increments and other funds herein pledged for the payment of the Bonds will be collected in amounts not less than five percent in excess of the amounts needed to meet when due the principal of and interest on the Bonds as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61. Consequently, no ad valorem taxes are now levied to pay the Bonds or the interest to come due thereon, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.77(a). If the money on hand in the Bond Fund should at any time be insufficient to pay principal and interest due on all bonds payable therefrom, such amounts may be paid from any other fund of the City and such other.fund shall be reimbursed therefor when sufficient moneys are available in the Bond Fund. If on October 1 in any year the sum of the balance in the Bond Fund plus the amount of tax increment revenue collectible through the end of the following calendar year is not sufficient to pay when due all principal and interest to become due on all bonds payable therefrom in the following calendar year, or the Bond Fund has incurred a deficiency in the manner provided in this Section 4.03, a direct, irrepealable, ad valorem tax shall be levied on all taxable property within the corporate limits of the City for the purpose of restoring such accmumlated or anticipated deficiency in accordance with the provisions of this Resolution. 8/18/86 4.04. Additional Bonds The City reserves the right to issue additional bonds payable from the Bond Fund as may be required to finance costs of the Redevelopment Project not financed hereby or to finance costs of other projects to be undertaken by the Authority within the District. 4.05. Execution of Documents. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute and deliver on behalf of the City such documents as may be appropriate to evidence the pledge and appropriation of the Tax Increments by the Authority to the City to pay the Bonds. Section 5. Defeasance. When all of the Bonds have been discharged as provided in this Section 5, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this Resolution to the holders of the Bonds shall cease. The City may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds which are due on any date by irrevocably depositing with the paying agent on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or, if any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the paying agent a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued to the date of such deposit. The City may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a bank qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities which are general obligations of the United States or securities of United States agencies which are authorized by law to be so deposited, bearing interest payable at such time and at such rates and maturing on such dates as shall be required, without reinvestment, to pay all principal and interest to become due thereon to maturity. Section 6. Registration, Certification of Proceedings, Investment of Moneys and Arbitrage. 6.01. Registration. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the County Auditor of Hennepin County, together with such other information as he shall require, and to obtain from said County Auditor a certificate that the Bonds have been entered on his bond register as required by law. 6.02. Certification of Proceedings. The officers of the City and the County Auditor of Hennepin County are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser and to Dorsey & Whitney, Bond Counsel, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City, and such other affidavits, certifi- cates and information as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the facts recited therein. 6.03. Covenant. The City covenants and agrees with the holders from time to time of the Bonds that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any action which would cause the interest on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended (the Code), and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder (the Regulations) as existing on the date of issuance of the Bonds, and covenants to take any and all actions within its powers to ensure that the interest on the Bonds will not become subject to taxation under the Code and the Regulations as existing on the date of issuance of the Bonds. In particular, the City covenants that it shall not take any action or exercise any remedies pursuant to any re- development agreement or other agreement with respect to any property in the District, if the effect thereof would be, in the opinion of the City's bond counsel, to cause the Bonds to be considered "industrial development bonds" or "consumer loan bonds" pursuant to the Code. 6.04. Arbitrage. The Mayor and City Manager, being the officers of the City charged with the responsibility for issuing the Bonds pursuant to this resolution, are authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the Purchaser a certificate in accordance with the provisions of Section 103(c) of the Code, and Treasury Regulations, Sections 1.103 -13, 1.103 -14 and.1.103 -15, stating the facts, estimates and circumstances in existence on the date of issue and delivery of the Bonds which make it reasonable to expect that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of the Code and Regulations. Section 7. Pending Federal Tax Legislation. 7.01. Tax Reform Bill. This Council understands that on December 17, 19859 the United States House of Representatives passed H.R. 3838 (the Tax Reform Bill), which, among other things, includes substantial additional requirements which must be satisfied by the issuers of municipal obligations (including obligations of the character of the Bonds) in order that the interest on such obligations be and remain exempt from federal income taxation. In their current form, the pro- visions of the Tax Reform Bill apply to municipal obligations issued after December 31, 1985. On March 14, 1986, the Chairmen and Ranking Members of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Ways and Means and the U.S. Senate 8/18/86 a Committee on Finance and the Secretary of Treasury issued a Joint Statement on the Effective Dates of Pending Tax Reform Legislation (the Joint Statement). The Joint Statement endorses postponement (until September 1, 1986, or the date of enactment of tax reform legislation, whichever is earlier) of the effective date of certain provisions and restrictions of the Tax Reform Bill applicable to certain municipal obligations, including the Bonds. Such provisions and restrict- ions of the Tax Reform Bill include the definition of ".,.:onessential function" bonds, new arbitrage restrictions, restrictions on the early issuance of bonds and information reporting requirements. The Joint Statement is a statement of intent only and is not binding on Congress. The municipal bond market, however, appears to have accepted an issue of municipal obligations where the issuer has not covenanted to comply with those provisions of the Tax Reform Bill covered by the Joint Statement. To enhance the marketability of the Bonds, this Council has determined it to be necessary and desirable and in the best interests of the City to structure the Bonds and the application of the proceeds thereof in a manner so as to comply with the requirements of the Tax Reform Bill interpreted in accordance with the Joint Statement and, to use the best efforts of the City to comply, if possible, with the requirements of the Tax Reform Bill as finally enacted, assuming that, as finally enacted, it would apply to the Bonds. 7.02. Covenants; Reliance on Joint Statement. The City covenants and agrees with the owners from time to time of the Bonds that it will take, and will cause its officers, employees or agents to take, all actions necessary to comply with the Tax Reform Bill, and that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any actions that would cause interest on the Bonds to become subject to federal income taxation under the Tax Reform Bill, until the Tax Reform Bill•.is enacted or the 99th Congress adjourns sine die without enactment of the Tax Reform Bill. In addition, the City covenants and agrees with the owners from time to time of the Bonds that if the Tax Reform Bill is enacted and its provisions are applicable to the Bonds, that the City, to the extent it is authorized by law, will use its best efforts to take, and to cause its officers, employees and agents to take, all actions necessary to comply with the Tax Reform Bill as enacted, and that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any action which would cause interest on the Bonds to become subject to federal income taxation under the provisions of the Tax Reform Bill as enacted. In reliance on the Joint State- ment, however, the covenants of the City contained in this Section 7.02 to comply with the Tax Reform Bill as passed by the U.S. House of Representatives or as finally enacted do not include compliance with those provisions of the Tax Reform Bill the effective dates of which are postponed by the Joint State- ment. The City covenants that if, notwithstanding the Joint Statement, such provisions are applicable to the Bonds, the City will use its best efforts to comply, to the extent then possible, with such provisions, but no assurance can be given that such compliance would then be possible. 7.03. Proposed Interest Disallowance. The City hereby designates the Bonds as "qualified tax - exempt obligations" for purposes of Section 802(e) of the Tax Reform Bill relating to the disallowance of interest expenses for financial institutions. 7.04. Amendment of Resolution. The City reserves the right to amend or modify the provisions of Section 7.02, if and to the extent that the City receives an opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel that such amendment or modifi- cation will not adversely affect the exemption from federal income taxation of the interest on the Bonds under then existing laws or regulations or the Tax Reform Bill. ATTEST: Mayor Pro -Tem The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member Kelly, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and the following voted against the same: None whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, and was signed by the Mayor, which signature was attested by the City Clerk. PUBLIC HEARING ON PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -267 CONTINUED TO 9/8/86. Engineer Hoffman stated that at its meeting of August 4, 1986 the Council had continued the public hearing on Permanent Street Surfacing Improvement No. P -BA -267 to this meeting. He advised that the developer has requested the public hearing be continued to the meeting of September 8, 1986. Motion of Member Bredesen was seconded by Member Turner to continue the public hearing on Permanent Street Surfacing Improvement No. P -BA -267 to September 8, 1986. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner Motion carried. 8/18/86 PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED; SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. P -S -36 APPROVED. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Engineer Hoffman explained that this is an informal public hearing on the construction of sidewalk on the West side of Gleason Road from Valley View Road to Cherokee Trail. This hearing has been called as a result of requests from residents in this area for better pedestrian access to the Creek Valley Elementary School. Estimated cost of construction is $84,872.76 and the concrete sidewalk is proposed to be five feet wide. The entire cost of the improvement is proposed to be paid from Municipal State Aid funds and no.- assessment.is proposed against abutting properties. Graphics were presented of.the plans which include a narrowing of Gleason Road between Balder Lane and Cherokee Trail to protect.existing wall structure. The alignment will be varied to protect existing property features to the greatest extent possible. Because this is proposed as a State Aid project, plans would be submitted to MNDOT for approval and it would be necessary for the Council to adopt a resolution banning parking for one block from Balder Lane to Cherokee Trail. If approved, bids could be taken in September and construction could be begun in October. Mr. Hoffman noted that a letter of objection to the project had been received from L. Thomas Gartner, 6520 Gleason Road. Member Turner asked if State Aid funds were available for the proposed project. Mr. Hoffman said less State Aid funds would be encumbered for the West 50th Street project for this year. John Dunnigan, 6225 Balder Lane, asked how many children would be using the proposed sidewalk and suggested that if they were bused to the school the sidewalk would not be needed. Speaking in support of the project were: Carol Grossman, 6616 Gleason Road; John and Nan Castino, 6624 Gleason Road; Marti Jansen, 6216 St. Albins Circle, who presented a list of residents on St. Albins Circle in support of the project. Virginia Bodine, 6525 Gleason Road, stated that speed on Gleason Road is part of the issue for the side- walk request and that something must be done about controlling the speeding of vehicles. Mayor Pro -Tem Richards asked how the proposed project fits into the City's sidewalk plan. Mr. Hoffman explained that no sidewalk for the west side of Gleason would have been proposed if there had not been a request from the homeowners who now reside in that area. The City's plan is to construct a sidewalk on one side only of all major collector streets. No further comment being heard, Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION ORDERING GLEASON ROAD SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly mailed to owners of each parcel within the affected area on the following proposed improvement: Sidewalk Improve- ment No. P -S -36 and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice, the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improvement, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights for construction and maintenance of such improvement; that said improve- ment is hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as: SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -36, cost of which shall be paid from Municipal State Aid Funds. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner Resolution adopted. PUBLIC HEARING ON ZONING CHANGE AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR NAMRON CORPORATION CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 8, 1986. Norman Bjornnes stated that he was the proposed developer of the project for the Namron Corporation and requested that the - hearing be continued to the meeting of September 8, 1986 to allow him to discuss with the lender pending federal tax legislation. Motion of Member Bredesen was seconded by Member Turner to continue the hearing on the rezoning request and preliminary plat for Namron Corporation to September 8, 1986. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner Motion carried. AMENDMENTS TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1980 -1990 ADOPTED; KEY ISSUES FOR I -494 CORRIDOR STUDY DISCUSSED. Planner Craig Larsen said that this public hearing has been called to consider amendments to the Comprehensive Plan 1980 -1990 and that the proposed amendments to the Plan reflect changes suggested by the Council during the Saturday work session of January 25, 1986. The proposed amendments were considered and approved by the Community - Development and Planning Commission at its April 30, 1986 meeting. Since then staff has been working on transporta- tion issues related to the southern part of the City, in particular I -494. Mr. Larsen presented graphics showing potential non - residential development and redevelopment in southern Edina representing possible full development by the year 2010 and using maximum development allowed by the Zoning Ordinance in making the projections. The areas for potential development were identified by Trans- portation Analysis Zones (TAZs) which had been assigned to the City in the 1970's 8%18%86 when the Comprehensive Plan was first prepared. The following summary was pre- sented: Office and Commercial Floor Area August 15, 1986 Existing Potential Potential TAZ Floor Area Expansion Vacant Land 811 364M 644M 113M 818 1,937M 1,330M 354M 820 3,303M 2,143M - 821 170M 88M - 822 587M 63M - 823 2,351M 1,024M - 824 907M 608M - 825 2,015M 761M - 826 974M 526M 989M 12,608M 7,187M 1,456M All figures are in thousands of square feet. Mayor Pro -Tem Richards asked for comments regarding the other amendments to the Plan with regard to the Land Use, Housing, Environmental Protection and Community Facilities prior to discussion on the Transportation Element. Member Turner recalled that in the January work session there was discussion on adding a Human Services Element. Mr. Larsen stated that there is no pattern to follow, that all communities are in the thinking stage and that the Metropolitan Council is in the process of developing criteria for what they would like to see in a Human Services plan. Following discussion, it was concluded not to draft a Human Services Element at this time. Member Turner also commented that she would like to have included in the Transportation Element a reference to the survey taken by the City in April, 1986 with regard to citizens' non - support of additional transit opportunities within the City. Member Turner then directed the Council's attention to the key issues identified by the I -494 Project Management Team (I -494 Corridor Study) and asked for discussion and direction. The issues presented were: 1) Land Development /Travel Demand /Transportation Supply Relationships, 2) Role of Major Transit Capital Investments in the I -494 Corridor, 3) Role of I -494 in Serving Medium and Short Trips, 4) Role of the Private Sector and Public Sector in Financing Roadway and Transit Improvements, and 5) Right -of -Way Constraint /Adjacent Frontage Roads /Detached Frontage Roads. Member Turner pointed out that the key issue for consideration is the Land Deve- lopment /Travel Demand /Transportation Supply Relationships. For the study, each city has defined the possible maximum square footage of development at full land use within its ordinances. It is expected that those numbers will probably'.exceed what can physically be- built. Member Turner commented that in looking at the Transportation Element in the Comprehensive Plan is seems clear that the City's philosophy has been to control traffic by controlling development. The Council then discussed land use control summarized as follows: 1) it must be administered fairly regardless of when development takes place, 2) breadth of control over land use must include all communities from which traffic feeds into the I -494 corridor, 3) contributing factor is level of tolerance people will accept with regard'to traffic delay,,4) the Metropolitan Council should act as a regional planning authority to control land use and the resulting impact on I- 494 and 5) that developments should bear part of the cost to provide for high- ways serving those developments. With regard to key issue No. 2, it was felt that transit will not be a solution for traffic problems on I -494. On key issue No. 3 regarding medium and short length trips it was noted that the Comprehensive Plan supports the ring route system which is a concept designed to promote traffic circulation along I -494 and to divert local traffic from the freeway. This concept was first proposed in the DMJM study completed in 1972. It was agreed that the ring road system should only extend north to 77th and 76th Streets. In discussing key issue No. 4 it was pointed out that in some states developments have to pay for transportation improvements not just for abutting streets but for arterial roadways /highways if they are over a certain level. The comment was made that to be equitable, cities would have to go back and look at how they would spread that type of cost to existing or future development. With regard to private sector financing of off -site roadway improvements by tax increment financing, no support was indicated for that.technique. As to key issue No. 5, it was felt that acquiring right of way for widening of I -494 would be extremely costly and that if a high level of development along the corridor is to be allowed, then regulating agencies and /or municipalities will have to look to developments for financing the acquisition of additional right of way as a condition for approving those developments which impact traffic on I -494. With regard to any proposed upgrading of County Road 462 to alleviate traffic on I -494, it was agreed that the City should vigorously oppose that alternative, with the exception of supporting improvement of the I -35 /Crosstown commons area. The Council also reiterated its opposition to any widening of arterial or collector streets (i.e. West 50th Street) as an alternative for alleviating traffic on I -494. No public comment was heard on the Transportation element of the Plan. Member Turner then introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: 8/18/86 RESOLUTION ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO CITY OF EDINA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1980/90 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby approves and adopts the following Amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan 1980/90: Land Use Element, Housing Element, Environmental Protection Element, Trans- portation Element and Community Facilities Element as presented at the regular meeting of the Council of August 18, 1986. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner Resolution adopted. PUBLIC HEARING ON EASEMENT VACATION (GRANDVIEW PLATEAU) CONTINUED TO 9/8/86. As requested by proponent, motion of Member Bredesen was seconded by Member Turner to continue the public hearing on proposed easement vacation on Lots 1, 2, 3 and 12, Block 1, Grandview Plateau to the meeting of September 8, 1986. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR PLAYGOUND EQUIPMENT FOR NORMANDALE PARK; BIDS REJECTED F..OR.WOOD- DALE PARK. Manager Rosland presented tabulations of bids for playground equip- ment for Normandale Park showing Earl F. Andersen & Associates, Inc. at $16,933.00 and Flanagan Sales, Inc. at $21,715.00. It was recommended that bids for Wooddale Park playground equipment be rejected and be re -bid after some re- design of the park. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid to recommended low bidder, Earl F. Anderson and Associates, Inc., at $15,933.00 for playground equipment for Normandale Park. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner Motion carried. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Kelly that all bids for playground equipment for Wooddale Park be rejected and be re -bid after design changes. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR RE- PIPING OF GAS SYSTEM /PUBLIC WORKS. Manager Rosland presented tabulations of bids for complete re- piping and installation of new pumps in four 10,000 gallon gas tanks at the Public Works Building showing Westside Equipment Installers at $11,301.00, Zahl Equipment at $12,435.00 and Pump & Meter Service, Inc. at $18,800.00. He added that this is a Capital Plan expenditure on existing system. Motion of Member Bredesen was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid to recommended low bidder, Westside Equipment Installers, at $11,301.00. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner Motion carried. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF AUGUST 12, 1986 APPROVED. Motion of Member Bredesen was seconded by Member Kelly to approve the following recommended action as listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of August 12, 1986: 1) Installation of a "STOP" sign on Edinborough Way at West 76th Street, 2) Installation of a "STOP" sign on Edinborough Way at York Avenue South, 3) Installation of a "STOP" sign at the Edinborough entrance road at York . Avenue, and to acknowledge Section C of the Minutes. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner Motion carried. EDINA CENTENNIAL COMMISSION BUDGET PRESENTED. Dennis Maetzold, treasurer of the Edina Centennial Commission, recalled that in June 1986, Betty Hemstad and Kay Bach, co- chairs of the Commission and he had made a presentation to the Council concerning the 1988 Edina Centennial. Proposed program events and a preliminary budget were presented. The finance committee has been re- viewing the budget and has estimated that the centennial operating expense will be $75,000.. Based on the committee's estimate it has developed specific fund raising goals: 1) to fund the $75,000 operating expense and 2) to raise $250,000 to be used for a lasting memorial, specifically a permanent home for the Edina Historical Society for a total fund raising goal of $325,000. He outlined funding sources or strategies as follows: 1) business contributions of $100,000 (event sponsorship /direct giving), 2) individual contributions, 3) year -long raffle and 4) City of Edina support. The specific request from the City is for a $25,000 contribution in both 1987 and 1988, with a "loan" in 1987 to cover operating expenses in excess of the City's $25,000 contribution. Mayor Pro -Tem Richards expressed concern that the contributions may not come in as anticipated and that the City would be the major contributor. Member Turner pointed out that there are enough control points in the planning process so that the program could be scaled back if there was not community financial support. Attorney Erickson advised that the City must control the expenditure 8/18/86 of the $50,000 in the same manner as it controls other public funds. In response Mr. Maetzold commented that the Centennial really is a City function and that the Edina Centennial Commission is a commision of the City. Following discussion, it was informally agreed to act upon the Centennial budget request when the Council considers the draft 1987 Budget in September. ' MANAGER'S RESPONSE TO MANAGERMENT AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT GIVEN. Manager Rosland stated.that following the Strategic Planning session of July 14, he has reviewed the Management Audit Committee's Report. He outlined recommendations which have been completed or are underway regarding Strategic Planning, Finance, Operations and Personnel; recommendations which should be implemented; recommendations relating to Strategic Planning issues and recommendations with which staff dis- agrees. Member Bredesen suggested that these comments and recommendations as outlined in the August 18, 1986 memorandum be referred to the committee for their response. Mr. Rosland said he would contact the chairman with the Council's suggestion and would report back on the subject. No formal action was taken. REPORT GIVEN ON MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT AND FLOODING PROBLEMS. Engineer Hoffman reported that engineers and staff from the cities downstream of Minnehaha Creek, together with a council member from Minneapolis, had met on August 5, 1986 to discuss a united effort to appear before the Watershed District Board and ask it to be more cognizant of downstream concerns. They have determined that there are approximately 8 to 10 homes downstream that have the potential for flooding resulting in structural problems to the buildings. It was the consensus of the engineers that the communities should unite to request the Board to review their policy as it relates to those homes and work with the communities to provide flood protection in some form through a joint effort. The purpose of the joint effort would be to develop a design that would protect homes along the creek and to look at funding options to provide that protection which would possibly include some assessment to property owners. Mr. Hoffman recommended that the Council adopt a resolution asking the Board to review the information and request their participation in flood protection for those homes. Member Kelly was asked to attend the August 21 Board Meeting with Mr. Hoffman when the cities would present their request. Margaret Francis, 4609 Cascade Lane, reiterated her request that something be done this Fall so that their home would not be flooded again next Spring. Sharon Libby, 4612 Cascade Lane, said that they had incurred considerable expense already in repairing a retaining wall that had been damaged by flooding and questioned additional cost of a special assessment. Mayor Pro -Tem Richards suggested that Mrs. Francis and Mrs. Libby also attend the Board meeting to give their input. Member Kelly then introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RRgnT.TTTTnM BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of,Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby supports a joint effort by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the downstream communities, including Edina, to provide design and funding to protect homes along Minnehaha Creek from flooding. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner Resolution adopted. REVISED FINAL PLAN FOR FRANCE AVENUE IMPROVEMENT APPROVED. Engineer Hoffman explained that there were some minor changes to the final plan for the France Avenue Improvement to include traffic signal modernization and that a resolution approving the revised plan is recommended. Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RFC(1T.TTTTnM WHEREAS, the planned reconstruction of France Avenue from West 49 1/2 Street to Excelsior Boulevard is a cooperative project involving the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Hennepin County and the cities of Minneapolis, St. Louis Park and Edina; and WHEREAS, the Construction Plan for Widening and Paving France Avenue South, S.P. No. 2728 -49, S.A.P. No. 120 - 010 -02, 141- 010 -09, showing proposed alignment, profiles, grades, and cross sections has been prepared and presented to the City; and traffic signal modernization identified as S.A.P. 120 - 140 -02 and S.A.P. 120- 010-03; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, That said Plan be in all things approved. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner Resolution adopted. REVISED 1986 CAPITAL BUDGET 1986 Capital Budget has been review. The revised budget APPROVED. Manager Rosland recalled that a revised presented to the Council at its last meeting for shows an adjustment from $3,665,000 down to a total 8/18/86 of $2,958,000. Member Turner asked if that would mean that in 1987 there would be additional funds to use for capital improvements. Engineer Hoffman indicated that State Aid funding will be less next year because of cutbacks that have occured and because the motor vehicle excise tax was not transferred. Member Turner made a motion to approve the 1986 Revised Capital Budget as presented. Motion was.seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner Motion carried. Following discussion, it was informally agreed to delay action of the proposed Nine Year Capital Plan until the 1987 Budget hearings. 1987 BUDGET HEARING DATES SET. Motion of Member Bredesen was seconded by Member Kelly setting the following 1987 Budget hearing dates: September 9, 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m., September 12, 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. and September 15, 7:00 p.m. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner Motion carried. PICNIC TO HONOR PAT GREER NOTED. Member Kelly reminded the Council Members that Pat Greer is retiring from the position as co- director of the Edina Art Center and that a picnic has been planned in appreciation for her many years of service to the Art Center. The event will be held on August 20 at 5:00 p.m. at the Art Center. ATTENDANCE AT MEETING OF SHHSC NOTED. Member Kelly said she was very pleased by the attendance from Edina at a recent meeting of the South Hennepin Human Services Council and that those citizens serving on the council are doing an excellent job. LETTER TO RESIDENTS ON CIRCLE WEST APPRECIATED. Member Kelly thanked the staff for the letter that was recently sent to residents on Circle West who have been concerned about the flooding in that area. PLANNING STAFF COMMENDED FOR WORK ON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS. Member Turner commended Planner Craig Larsen and his staff for the time and effort spent in drafting the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan which were presented at this meeting, in particular the information on the Transportation Element. MEMBER TURNER NOMINATED FOR TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD. Member Turner called the Council's attention to the fact that ten positions on the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) are reserved for municipal elected officials and that the recent AMM bulletin asked for nominations to be submitted no later than August 27. Motion of Member Bredesen was seconded by Member Kelly to submit the name of Member Turner in nomination to the TAB. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner Motion carried. Mayor Pro -Tem Richards asked that staff draft a letter of nomination for the Mayor's signature to send to the AMM prior to August 27. INTERLACHEN BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS NOTED. Member Turner asked what work the county is proposing to do on Interlachen Boulevard. Engineer Hoffman explained that the county is going to overlay the roadway and where feasible the road will be widened on the north side to provide space for walkers and joggers. The work should be completed within the next three weeks. BIKE SAFETY PROGRAM LEADER COMMENDED. Member Bredesen commented that his sons recently had been in attendance in the Bike Safety class and commended the leader for doing a good job in presenting an effective message. 50TH STREET IMPROVEMENT REPORTED ON SCHEDULE. In response to Mayor Pro -Tem Richards, Engineer Hoffman said that the improvements to West 50th Street are on schedule and the target date for re- opening the street is Labor Day weekend. PROPOSED RELOCATION OF EDINA HISTORICAL SOCIETY TO ARNESON PARK TO BE STUDIED BY PARK BOARD. Manager Rosland said that the Edina Historical Society has been working with the Edina Garden Council regarding the proposed relocation of the Historical Society to the Arneson Park building and that this matter will be presented to the Park Board for their recommendation and referral to the Council later this Fall. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL'S ESTIMATE OF EDINA POPULATION NOTED. Manager Rosland referred to the Metropolitan Council's 1986 population and household estimates, noting that Edina's population is up slightly for a total of 45,523. No action was taken. RESOLUTION ADOPTED BANNING PARKING ON GLEASON ROAD FROM BALDER LANE TO CHEROKEE TRAIL. Engineer Hoffman explained that in connection with the sidewalk improve- 8/18/86 ment for Gleason Road approved earlier in the meeting, a no parking resolution would be required for the one block between Balder and Cherokee Trail.to meet State Aid requirements. The question arose as to whether notice was given to affected property owners regarding the proposed parking ban. Mayor Pro -Tem Richards suggested that the resolution could be adopted now and that Mr. Hoffman be instructed to contact the affected residents so that they could come before the Council on September 8 with any objections. Member Bredesen then introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON S.A.P. 120- 148 -03 FROM VALLEY VIEW ROAD TO CHEROKEE TRAIL IN THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA THIS RESOLUTION, passed this 18th day of August, 1986 by the City of Edina in Hennepin County, Minnesota. The Municipal corporation shall hereinafter be called the "City ", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the "City" has planned the improvement of MSAS 148 (Gleason Road) from Valley View Road to Cherokee Trail; WHEREAS, the "City" will be expending Municipal State Aid Funds on the improve- ment of this street, and WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid Street project must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrict- ions, and WHEREAS, the extent of these restrictions that would be necessary prerequisite to the approval of this construction as a Municipal State Aid project in the "City ", has been determined; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED: That the "City" shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on both sides of MSAS 148 (Gleason Road) from Balder Lane to Cherokee Trail at all times. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner Resolution adopted. CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner for payment of the following claims as per pre -list of 8/18/86: General Fund $303,947.51, Art Center $1,118.84, Swimming Pool Fund $6,914.20, Golf Course Fund $25,173.00, Recreation Center Fund $7,932.27, Gun Range Fund $635.55, Edinborough Park $195.56, Utility Fund $39,453.95, Liquor Dispensary Fund $125,308.57, Con- struction Fund $680,923.30, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $535.73, Total $1,192,138.48; and for confirmation of payment of the following claims dated 7.31.86: General Fund $389,386.64, Art Center $812.42, Swimming Pool Fund $3,715.16, Golf Course Fund $13,551.40, Recreation Center Fund $2,014.97, Gun Range Fund $281.07, Utility Fund $13,213.03, Liquor Dispensary Fund $290,843.72, Construction Fund $118,158.35, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $125.00, Total $832,101.76. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner Resolution adopted. Mayor Pro -Tem Richards then relinquished the chair to Member Turner for the last agenda item and excused himself from the meeting. RESOLUTION ADOPTED GIVING FINAL APPROVAL TO TRANSFER OF CONTROLLING INTEREST IN CITY'S CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE. Manager Rosland recalled that the Council had held a public hearing on May 5, 1986 and had at that time given preliminary approval to a change of ownership and refinancing plan for Rogers Cablesystems of Minnesota. He said that the refinancing is now in place and the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission (SWSCC) has reviewed all documentation for the change of ownership and refinancing and recommends approval. No comment being heard, Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION GIVING FINAL APPROVAL TO A TRANSFER OF CONTROLLING INTEREST IN CITY'S CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE WHEREAS, The City of Edina, Minnesota, ( "City ") has granted a cable television franchise (the "Franchise ") to Rogers Cablesystems of Minnesota Limited Partner- ship (the "Grantee ") pursuant to City's cable communications ordinance (the "Franchise Ordinance "); and WHEREAS, City has also adopted an ordinance (the "Relief Ordinance ") intended to provide financial relief to Grantee by providing for a modification of Grantee's obligations for a period of time in order to permit refinancing of Grantee's long- term debt and to enhance its financial viability; and WHEREAS, Grantee has now proposed a refinancing plan, as contemplated by the Franchise Ordinance and the Relief Ordinance and seeks approval of such plan; and WHEREAS, the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission (hereinafter SWSCC) has adopted a Resolution, a copy of which is incorporated herein and made part hereof, recommending approval of the transfer of controlling interest in Grantee, approval of Grantee refinancing its long -term debt, and recommending approval of the extension of the Franchise Ordinance term; and 8/18/86 WHEREAS,'the Resolution of the SWSCC recommends compliance by Grantee of certain conditions; and WHEREAS, it is intended that this Resolution will serve to approve the refinancing plan of Grantee that includes first, with the adoption of this Resolution, the approval of the transfer of controlling interest in Grantee, and second, based on the transfer of the controlling interest in Grantee and refinancing according to an amendment to a Loan Agreement, an opportunity for improving the financial operating condition of Grantee; WHEREAS, Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc., formerly Rogers Cablesystems of Minnesota, Inc. ( "RCSI ") is the general partner of Grantee and is a wholly -owned subsidiary of Rogers U.S. Cablesystems, Inc. ( "RUSCI "); and WHEREAS, the proposed transfer of controlling interest calls for a change in owner- ship of Grantee's general partner through transfer of the ownership of the shares of RCSI from RUSCI to Rogers American Cable Corp. ( "RACC "), a wholly -owned subsi- diary of Rogers Cablesystems of America, Inc., ( "RCA "); and WHEREAS, RCSI and Grantee have represented to the SWSCC, which acts on behalf of the City on certain matters related to cable television, that in conjunction with the proposed transfer of controlling interest in Grantee, RACC will make use of its line of credit from time to time as necessary to provide funds to Grantee to meet operating expenses and debt service payments and RCA will also guarantee per- formance of Grantee's under the Franchise Ordinance and Relief Ordinance; and WHEREAS, it has been represented by Grantee to SWSCC that such transfer of stock ownership of RCSI will strengthen the financial position of RCSI and will facilitate the refinancing of Grantee's long -term debt; and WHEREAS, SWSCC has engaged the firm of Touche Ross, certified public accountants, to review this proposed transfer of stock ownership of RCSI and the proposed refinancing; and WHEREAS, Touche Ross has made a report to SWSCC indicating that it has reviewed financial material provided to it by RCA and has found that its financial condition is healthier than that of RUSCI; and WHEREAS, simultaneous with the transfer of controlling interest in Grantee to RACC, an offer was made to the individual limited partners in Grantee to acquire their interest, with limited partners holding approximately sixty percent (60 %) of the units agreeing to the sale; RACC has assigned its right to purchase these units to RCSI; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 238.083, and Article XII of the Franchise Ordinance, require City approval of any transfer of controlling interest of Grantee; and WHEREAS, it appears that the proposed transfer of controlling interest will not adversely affect the Grantee's subscribers; and WHEREAS, it appears that the proposed transfer of controlling interest is likely to benefit Grantee and may, in turn, permit Grantee to provide better service to its subscribers than it would otherwise be able to provide. WHEREAS, City finds that Grantee has complied with the conditions imposed in a Preliminary Resolution passed by City and dated May 5, 1986, WHEREAS, the City considered the transfer of controlling interest request at its meeting on August 18, 1986, reviewed the Resolution and recommendation of the SWSCC and the presentation from its staff, discussed the requests with represen- tatives of Grantee, and considered all of the reports and information presented to it at its meeting and finds, based on the foregoing; that A. All procedural requirements set forth in the Franchise and Minnesota state law regarding the consideration of a cable communications system franchise transfer of controlling interest and the approval of the refinancing have been complied with; B. The proposed transfer of controlling interest and refinancing would be in the public interest as contemplated under the Franchise and that the transferee has demonstrated that the transfer of controlling interest will enable the transferee to finance the cable communications system in a more efficient manner that currently existing, thereby eliminating potential financial pressure and cash flow problems on the systems and on future subscriber rates; C. As part of the transfer of controlling interest request and approval of it, the City has relied upon SWSCC's financial consultant representations that by having assurances from the parent organizations of Grantee the financial strength of the cable communications system will be improved; and, in reliance upon this, City has requested Grantee to secure approval from the parent organizatons to execute an Agreement of Joint and Several Liability, to be executed by Rogers Cablesystems, Inc., a Canadian corporation, ( "Canadian "), RCA and RACC; and D. With the completion of the refinancing as contemplated by the Amendment to Loan Agreement, the provision of Article II, Section 4 of the Franchise Ordinances of the Members Cities will be satisfied, and upon execution of an Agreement between Grantee and each City acknowledging the completion of refinancing and payment of the "Existing Indebtedness ", as described in Article II, Section 4, the Franchise Ordinance will be extended by four (4) years; E. The terms of the refinancing and the transfer of controlling interest should be approved effective July 31, 1986, and finds that provisions of Article XII, a a 7 • 1 8/18/86 "� Section 1 of the Franchise Ordinance and Section 238.083 of the Minnesota Statutes are complied with and the terms of the refinancing..and transfer of controlling interest are acceptable. WHEREAS, City will authorize SWSCC to file with the Commissioner. of Commerce, as required under Minnesotalaw, the necessary documentation reflecting,the process involved in the approval of the transfer of controlling interest in Grantee and the agreements executed between the parties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that City hereby approves of the transfer of the controlling interest in Grantee and the acquisition of the limited partner- ship units by RCSI, subject to the following conditions: 1. Receipt from Grantee of final signed Resolutions, which will be sub- stantially in form and substance in conformance with the Resolutions presented to SWSCC and attached to the SWSCC Resolution, from RUSCI, RACC, RCA and RCSI and attorney's opinion in .a form acceptable to City, and compliance with all requirements of Article XIV, Section 2 of the Franchise Ordinance; 2. Execution by Grantee, and its parent corporation, of all necessary documents including an Acceptance, a Joint and Several Liability Agreement in form and substance acceptable to City and a Certification that all require- ments of Article XIV, Section 2 have been complied with. 3. Receipt by SWSCC of authority from Grantee to file with the Commissioner of Commerce the information relating to the transfer of controlling interest and refinancing and extension of term of Franchise Ordinance together with the authority from each Member City for SWSCC to do this filing. 4. Upon refinancing being completed Grantee will execute an Agreement together with City that will acknowledge that the refinancing, effective July 31, 1986, is complete and satisfactory according to the terms of Article II, Section 4 of the Franchise Ordinance and that the Franchise Ordinance term is extended by four (4) years. 5. The SWSCC is hereby authorized on behalf of City to make said filings as may be required with the Minnesota Commerce Department under Section 238.085 of Minnesota Statutes. 6. Grantee will pay the reasonable costs and disbursements of the SWSCC and its Member Cities directly related to the review and approval of its refinancing plan and the transfer of controlling interest approved by this Resolution. Passed and adopted this 18th day of August, 1986, by the City of Edina. CITY OF EDINA ATTEST: By Its: Acting Mayor City Clerk Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner Resolution adopted. There being no further business on the agenda, the meeting was adjourned by motion of Member Kelly, seconded by Member Bredesen. Motion carried. City Clerk q MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 8, 1986 Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor Courtney. UNITED WAY RESOLUTION ADOPTED. Mayor Courtney introduced the following resolution, and Member Turner moved its adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the United Way of Minneapolis Area currently provides funding to nearly 390 programs in 107 agencies, many located in and serving suburban communities; and WHEREAS, in the Edina area agencies such as Storefront /Youth Action and the American Heart Association provide programs ranging from counseling for physically or sexually abused adolescents to professional education; and WHEREAS, the efforts of thousands of community volunteers enable the United Way to maintain fundraising and administrative costs under nine cents to a dollar; and WHEREAS, in 1986 funds are being distributed to quality programs that reach more people in suburban communities; and WHEREAS, United Way works with county planning boards and private planning groups to identify gaps in services in a continuing effort to meet the comprehensive needs of people in the six county service areas. BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Council of Edina hereby support United Way's Salute to Small Business on Wednesday, September 17, 1986, in the Edina community and encourage local business and their employees to participate in this event. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. Member Turner expressed a "thank -you" to the City of Edina employees and the hundreds of Edina residents involved in this campaign. PUBLIC HEARING ON PERMANENT STREET SURFACING P -BA -267 CONTINUED TO JANUARY 18, 1987. As recommended by.Engineer Fran Hoffman, Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Kelly to continue the public hearing on Permanent Street Surfacing P -BA -267 (McCauley Trail from Gleason Road to 2000 feet west and Timber Trail from McCauley Trail to cul -de -sac) to January 18, 1987. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. PRELIMINARY REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR NAMRON CORPORATION. Planner Larsen presented the request for preliminary rezoning and preliminary plat approval for Namron Corporation, generally located north of Vernon Avenue and west of Villa Way. The zoning request'was a change from R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -4 Planned Residence District. Mr. Larsen explained that the subject request was heard two times by the Community Development and Planning Commission. On July 2, 1986, the proponent submitted plans for a three - story, 150 -unit apartment building to the Commission. The request was continued by the Commission to allow the proponent time to address density, parking /traffic and site development issues. The proponent returned to the Commission on July 30, 1986, with a revised plan illustrating a:'135 -unit apartment building. Density of the proposed development had been reduced from 21.9 units per acre to 19.8 units per acre. This compares to 18 for Villa Way and 24 for Interlachen Court, apartment buildings which are adjacent to the subject property. Mr. Larsen pointed out that the revised plan illustrates 169 covered parking spaces and 101 surface spaces. The spaces provided conform to the Zoning Ordinance requirement of 1.25 covered spaces per unit and .75 surface spaces. In response to comments, the plan suggests eliminating 33 of the surface spaces which would help save the existing site vegetation. Hennepin County has re- viewed the project and approved the proposed curb cut location. Mr. Larsen indicated that the Planning Commission recommended preliminary rezoning approval and preliminary plat approval with the following conditions: 1) acceptable final development plans; 2) final plat approval; 3) subdivision dedication; 4) developer's agreement; and 5) proof of parking agreement. In addition, the following recommendations should be considered: 1) trim an area of greenspace on Ayrshire Boulevard to improve the site lines to enter Vernon Avenue; 2) request that traffic counts be taken by Hennepin County at the Ayrshire Boulevard /Vernon Avenue intersection; 3) recommend if warranted that a traffic signal be erected at the Ayrshire Boulevard /Vernon Avenue intersection or a realignment of the road to better improve the site lines; and 4) reduction of the speed limit along Vernon Avenue from 40 miles per hour to 30 miles per hour. Mr. Norman Bjornes, the developer, was introduced. He explained that the project would have a brick exterior, elevators, TV security and all the amenities of a first -class home. No bond financing or subsidies will be sought; the project will stand on its own two feet financially. There will be $1 million worth of landscaping. d 9/8/86 This project will provide approximately $135,000 in new tax revenues. Mr. Nick Palaia, the architect, was introduced. He commented that the site is unique and challenging and presents great opportunities. The development will complement the adjacent developments. The most .unique feature of the site-is that it is extremely tree covered and severely sloped; these features would allow the developer to take a large development and depress it into a private, inward site. Essentially, the project will be below the existing developments. By lowering the number of units from 212 to 135, the setbacks were significantly increased beyond what is required; as a result, most of the vegetation around the periphery can be saved and privacy maintained from the single - family developments on the west and from Villa Way and Interlachen Court. A forester has been hired to help make judgments on the type of vegetation to be added to preserve the privacy during the winter months. 50% of the units are one - bedroom units; 42% are two - bedroom units; 8% are three - bedroom units. Three stories in height was chosen because there is a very direct relationship between parking and the height of the building. There appears to be no problems with sewage and site drainage, and water coming onto and off of the site can be handled. Mr. Mitch Wanson, a traffic engineer from Benshoof & Associates, was introduced. He has examined the existing traffic situation on Vernon Avenue in the vicinity of the site and analyzed.the impacts which this proposed development might have on Vernon Avenue. He stated the following conclusions based upon his analysis: 1) Vernon Avenue is a minor arterial roadway. In the vicinity of the proposal, there are approximately 27 vehicles per minute during the PM peak hour. Current traffic concerns include sight distance at Ayrshire Boulevard and Villa Way and high vehicular speed; 2) The development, Vernon Woods, is expected to generate 824 daily trips and 94 P. M. peak hour trips; 3) The main access to Vernon Woods has received Hennepin County approval; and 4) It is concluded that the public roadway system can safely and effectively accom- modate development traffic with no significant impacts on existing traffic concerns. ,,To assist in the resolution of existing traffic concerns, it is recommended that: 1) Existing understory vegetation at Ayrshire Boulevard be trimmed to improve sight lines; 2) The City monitor traffic growth in the vicinity of Eden Avenue /Vernon Avenue to determine if additional traffic signalization is warranted; 3) The City continue to enforce the speed limit on Vernon Avenue in the vicinity of the site; and 4) The City consider requesting Hennepin County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation to perform a speed limit analysis for Vernon Avenue. Member Turner inquired as to whether the standing water to the west of the property proposed to be developed indicated a problem with storm water drainage. Mr. Hoffman said that the current storm water drainage system has the ability to handle the proposed development subject to modifi- cations. Mr. Bill Mahoney, 5309 Ayrshire, said that he is adjacent to this proposed complex. He is concerned that this project will change the character of the neighborhood. Mr. Mahoney reported that Mr. Bjornes does not really own the subject property as indicated in the County records. Mr. Mahoney also commented that he and the neighbors were not against Mr. Bjornes developing the property but rather they are against the concept that the development will be high density. He felt that the alternative - -singl family residences - -would be more desirable and should be considered by Mr. Bjornes. This would put it on the same footing as the existing area. -Mrs. Wadsworth, 5300 Vernon Avenue, indicated that her concern is the traffic hazard and pollution. Mr. Mike Bolen, 5207 Doncaster Way, implied that the heart of the issue is the changing of the original plan for the use of the land - -a shift from the residential use that was originally designed to a high density unit. He reported that currently it is very difficult exiting onto Ayrshire. Mr. Robert Vaughn, 5224.Duncraig Road, feels that crime will become a major concern with the development of this high density project. Buzz Jonason, 5300 Glenbrae Circle, questioned whether or not the traffic consultant had considered the impact of the increase in traffic generated by Jerry's. Mr. Wanson responded that his consulting firm has not accounted for additional development on the Jerry's site. Mr. Hoffman indicated that at least two years ago a study was done on the Grandview traffic area which included all potential developments in this Vernon Avenue vicinity; the City as a result has reviewed what should be done if all potential projects are begun, and Mr. Hoffman commented that there will be adequate roadways to deal with this issue. Dr. Robert Benjamin, 5205 Duricraig Road, objects to the change in zoning; this project would be at the expense of those who have single - family homes in the area in that it would be a loss of equity for them. Carol Grossman, 6616 Gleason Road, objects to the zoning change because of the potential of a traffic increase. Member Richards asked when the property was first subject to a comprehensive plan and the density of Interlachen Court, Villa Way and the Biltmore site. Planner Larsen indicated that the designation of "high density residential" dates back to the Comprehensive Plan of 1980. Prior to this, in 1966 the City Council approved a re- zoning for a seven - story, 175 unit apartment project on the same site. That project did not go to completion after the preliminary re- zoning stage, and it was, therefore, never built. The area of crime was mentioned, and Member Bredesen 9/8/86 questioned the crime impact this development would have on the area. Chief Swanson responded that at Highland Villa there has not been much of a problem. Theft, however, is more common in high- density dwellings and apartment complexes with underground garages. The neighborhood to the west of the proposed project is one of the safer ones in the City. Member Turner questioned the number of trips per unit generated by this kind of land use. The traffic consultant responded that this figure is 6.1 (three in and three out). Mr. Roy Dickman, 6424 Aspen Road, does not see how this proposed development will hurt property values being that it will be snuggled into a hill and below Villa Way and should not have any effect on homes up on the hill. Furthermore, he commented that it is on Vernon Avenue and closer to commercial road than is Villa Way. He believes that people who want to retire in Edina would favor this location. Shirley Haffner, 5244 Lochloy, expressed the concern that there should be no need for more high- density developments in Edina. Member Bredesen remarked that there are already problems on Vernon Avenue which will continue whether or not this project is developed. This development will not make traffic problems any worse. He believes that the developer has made a good attempt to create a project consistent with the surrounding land. Member Turner stated that PRD -4 zoning is appropriate for that land but has a concern about the storm water drainage. She would like to see a sidewalk be built along the north side of Vernon. She also commented that Traffic Safety should look at this issue once again. Member Kelly also had a concern about the storm sewer and believes that the development would adversely impact the existing neighborhood. Member Richards would like to see some commitment made before second reading with what the developer would do in picking up some of the cost of signalization. There being no further discussion, Member Bredesen introduced the following ordinance for first reading and moved its adoption, subject to the following conditions: 1) acceptable final development plans; 2) final plat approval; 3) subdivision dedication; 4) developer's agreement; 5) proof of parking agreement; 6) storm sewer and sidewalk approval; and 7) signalization contribution: ORDINANCE NO. 825 -All AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825) BY ADDING TO THE PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT (PRD -4) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Planned Residence District (Sub- District PRD -4) is enlarged by the addition of the following property: That part of the following described part of Government Lot 7, Section 28, Township 117, Range 21, lying West of a line running South parallel with the East line of said Government Lot 7 from a point on the North line of said Government Lot 7, distant 845 feet West of the Northeast corner thereof to the Northwesterly right -of -way line of U. S. Highway No. 169; commencing at a point on the North line of said Government Lot 7 distant 845 feet West of the Northeast corner thereof; thence South parallel to the East line of said Government Lot 7 a distance of 708 feet to the point of beginning; thence South parallel to said East line 190 feet; thence West parallel to the North line of said Government Lot 7 to the West line thereof; thence South to the Southwest corner of said Government Lot 7; thence East along the South line thereof to the Northwesterly right -of -way line of U. S. Highway No. 169; thence Northeasterly along said Northwesterly right -of -way line to its intersection with a line drawn East, parallel to the North line of said Government Lot 7, from the point of beginning; thence West to the point of beginning, according to the Government Survey thereof; and that part of the North 1/2 of Government Lot 2, Section 33, Township 117 North, Range 21 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian lying Northwesterly of the right -of -way of State Highway Nos. 169 and 212, all according to the United States Survey thereof." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney Nays: Kelly Ordinance adopted. Member Bredesen than moved adoption of the following resolution, subject to the same conditions pertaining to the preceding ordinance: 9/8/86 RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL NAMRON COMPANY 2ND ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "Namron Company 2nd Addition," platted by Vernon Woods of Edina, a Minnesota Limited Partnership, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of September 8, 1986, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney Nays: Kelly Resolution adopted. HEARING DATE SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS. As recommended by staff, Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Richards setting September 15, 1986, as hearing date for the following planning matters:. 1) Robert Hansen - Generally located north of Crosstown Highway and east and north of Vernon Court - Zoning change from R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -2 Planned Residence District 2) Robert Kidd - Generally located south of West 62nd Street and east of Valley View Road - Zoning change from R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District and Preliminary Plat 3) Knutson Ventures - Generally located south of Eden Avenue and west of Soo Line Railroad track - Zoning change from PID Planned Industrial District to PRD -4 Planned Residence District 4) Warden Acres Dahle Replat - Generally located south of Grove Street and west of Garden Avenue - Preliminary Plat 5) Edinborough - 7600 York Avenue South - Conditional Use Permit 6) Final Development Plan - Generally located west of Parklawn Avenue and north of West 77th Street extended Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING ON EASEMENT VACATION CONTINUED TO 9/15/86. As recommended by staff, Member Richards' motion was seconded by Member Bredesen to continue the public hearing on the vacation of utility easements of Grandview Plateau, Lots 1, 2, 3 and 12, Block 1 to the meeting of September 15, 1986. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT AT WOODDALE PARK. Mr. Rosland presented a tabulation of bids for playground equipment at Wooddale Park showing Earl F. Andersen & Associates, Inc. at. $24,990 and Flanagan Sales, Inc. at $29,990. Member Bredesen moved award of bid to the recommended low bidder, Earl F. Andersen & Associates, Inc. at $24,990. Motion was seconded by Member Richards. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. REPORT GIVEN ON GLEASON ROAD PARKING RESTRICTIONS. Mr. Rosland reported that there would be two.families impacted by banning parking on Gleason Road from Cherokee Trail to Balder Lane. The Arnolds at 6229 Creek Valley Road never park on Gleason Road and have no objections to the ban. The Olsons at 6224 Balder Lane also have been contacted and share the same opinion. There was no further discussion, and no action was taken. REPORT GIVEN ON MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED. Mr. Hoffman remarked that there had been a meeting of. the Minnehaha Creek Watershed on August 21, 1986, attended by Council Member Kelly, Engineer Hoffman, Mrs. Francis and Mrs. Anfinson of Cascade Lane to discuss issues of concern occurring along the Minnehaha Creek in Edina. On September 5, the engineers of Minneapolis, St. Louis Park, Edina, Minnetonka, Hopkins and the Watershed District held another meeting. At that time, it was determined that there were only six or seven homes along the creek that had problems that were correctable by joint action between the City, the Watershed and the homeowners. The following solutions were discussed: 1) flood protection (berms); 2) modify operating plan; 3) Upper Watershed improvement project (Upper Watershed retention); 4) retrofit storage along the creek; and 5) floodplain filling. Mr. Hoffman indicated that staff is working with the Watershed Board to develop solutions regarding costs and funding options. No action was taken at this time. 9/8/86 RECOMMENDATIONS OF PARK BOARD MINUTES OF AUGUST 12, 1986, APPROVED. Mr. Rosland introduced the minutes of the Edina Park Board meeting of August 12, 1986 and entertained a motion for approval. (At 8:35 P. M., Member Richards excused himself from the meeting.) Member Turner made a motion to approve the following recommendations of the Park Board: 1) That the City of-Edina accept the Edina Wrestling Club as an athletic association under the auspices of the Edina Park and Recreation Department and assist with incorporation of the Edina Wrestling Association; 2) That the City of Edina become involved in the University of Minnesota program of relocation of geese as outlined in the .University's proposal letter; 3) That the recommended fees for 1987 for Braemar Arena and Braemar Golf Course be accepted; and 4) That the City investigate annual license renewals sent to dog owners, including a reminder of the dog ordinance.. The motion was seconded by Member Bredesen. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. BUDGET FOR 1987 PRESENTED TO COUNCIL. Mr. Rosland presented the proposed Budget for 1987 to the Council,Members for their review and consideration at the special budget hearings which have been scheduled. He advised that the Budget for 1987 must be adopted by October 1, 1986, as mandated by statute. No formal action was taken. 50TH STREET PROJECT COMMENDED. Members Turner and Bredesen praised the City on the completion of 50th Street and how wonderful it looks. The last layer of asphalt will be put down in approximately three weeks. Staff reported that citizens were generally well pleased with the final outcome of the construction project along 50th Street. THE "HIGHLANDER" DISCUSSED. Member Turner reported that she was very pleased with the "Highlander" which is the new centerfold in the Edina Sun - Current. Mr. Rosland commented that in the future it will be a separate section rather than just a centerfold. CONCERN EXPRESSED OVER THE BALANCE OF HOUSING NEEDS IN EDINA. Member Kelly expressed her growing concern that the City may be in conflict with its Mission Statement which essentially states that Edina's primary objective is to foster and enhance the City's original concept of a single family community and to protect existing housing and residential neighborhoods. Edina's focus should be on pl4ns and methods to increase affordable single family housing stock and to increase the opportunities for young families to locate in Edina. The City should not encourage more expensive multi- family housing but rather innovative programs for single family housing. The pressure for more density in housing causes conflict with existing neighborhoods and burdens the City's infrastructure - - roads, sewers, drainage - -which was designed for a single family environment. Member Kelly believes that the balance has shifted away from the primary objective of enhancement of the single family community to the concept of multi- family housing. She recommended that the Council undertake a re- assessment of the mission and comprehensive plan as it relates to housing and develop specific programs to encourage single family housing development and re- development. Member Turner suggested that discussion on this topic begin in January of 1987. PETITION FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REFERRED TO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. Mr. Rosland advised that a petition had been received for public improvements and recommended that it be referred to the Engineering Department for processing. Member Kelly's motion to refer the following petition to the Engineering Department for routine processing was seconded by Member Turner: - Petition for Permanent Street Surfacing in Interlachen Hills 3rd Addition Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Bredesen for payment of the following claims as per Pre -List dated 9/8/86: .General Fund, $172,618.34; Art Center, $2,305.61; Capital Fund, $399.00; Swimming Pool Fund, $6,279.30; Golf Course Fund, $47,686.19; Recreation Center Fund, $2,283.32; Gun Range Fund, $1,829.40; Edinborough Park, $120.08; Utility Fund, $214,029.76; Liquor Dispensary Fund, $2,889.07; Construction Fund, $13,670.88; IMP Bond Redemption #2, $550.00; Total, $464,660.95. There being no further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting adjourned at 9:00 P. M. Acting City Clerk MEMORANDUM DATE: October 17, 1986 TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: Craig Larsen, City Planner SUBJECT: Robert Hanson Rezoning, Z -86 -1 Attached are the Findings of Fact prepared by staff for the subject rezoning. Copies of the Findings were sent to Mr. Hanson and his attorney on October 10, 1986. Also attached is a response to our Findings by Mr. Hanson's attorney. The response includes a new graphic depicting proposed retaining walls for the project. I { CITY OF EDINA In The Matter of the Application FINDINGS, of Robert E. Hanson DECISIONS, for Rezoning of Property and at Vernon Avenue and Vernon Court REASONS (Z =86 =1) The above entitled matter was heard before the City Council, City of Edina, on May 19, September 15, and October 20, 1986. Robert E. Hanson (the "Proponent ") and his architect David C. Darrell were present. The City Council, having heard all of the facts and arguments presented by the Proponent, his architect, City Staff, and property owners in the vicinity of the subject rezoning, and having heard and reviewed the evidence and law adduced by the Proponent, his representative, City Staff, and property owners, and being fully advised, after due consideration, hereby makes the following: I f FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The Proponent, on March 21, 1986, submitted an application for rezoning from Ril, Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD =2, Planned Residence District for a 138,900 square foot tract of land located east of Vernon Avenue and north of Vernon Court. The property is unplatted and is part of the northeast one_ quarter of the northwest one quarter of Section 6, Township 116, Range 21 of Hennepin County, Minnesota. The property is vacant. 2. The rezoning initially proposed sixteen townhouse units, arranged in four, unit buildings. The proposed site plan illustrated front street setbacks varying from 6 feet to 20 feet. Edina Ordinance No. 825 (the "Zoning Ordinance ") requires a front street setback of 30 feet. A rear yard setback of 25 feet was provided by one of the buildings. The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum rear yard setback of 35 feet. 3. The Edina Community Development and Planning Commission (the "Commission ") first considered the proposed rezoning at its April 2, 1986 meeting. The Commission reviewed the report of the Planning Department and considered testimony by the proponent and his architect. The Commission voted to continue the request for rezoning to its April 30, 1986 meeting, and advised the proponent to increase the setbacks provided. 4. The request for rezoning was listed on the April 30, 1986 Commission agenda. No new plans were submitted to the Planning Department prior to the Commission meeting. The proponent and his architect appeared before the Commission with a revised site plan. The revised plan continued to illustrate a 16 unit development as initially proposed. The proposed front street setbacks remained the same as the previous plan and the rear yard setback was increased from 25 to 29 feet. The Commission voted to deny the requested rezoning due to the setback variances requested. 5. The proposed rezoning was scheduled for a public hearing before the Council on May 19, 1986. Notice of the public hearing was published in the Edina Sun_ Current and was mailed to property owners within 500 feet of the subject property. The proponent submitted plans for the proposed rezoning which were changed from those considered by the Commission. The plans continued to illustrate the same 16 unit townhouse development as previous plans. However, the site plan was altered to increase certain setbacks. The setback from the cul de sac was increased from 6 to 10 feet and remaining front street setbacks increased to 25 feet. The rear yard setback was reduced from 29 feet to 25 feet. The Council voted to refer the proposed rezoning back to the to the Commission to allow the proponent an opportunity to prepare a revised site plan. 6. The proposed rezoning was again considered by the Commission at its July 2, 1986 meeting. The proponent was not present, but was represented by Mr. Darrell and Mr. Cross who presented a revised site plan illustrating 15 units, three four unit buildings and one three unit building. The revised site plan illustrated a 27 foot front yard setback, 3 feet short of the 30 foot setback required in the PRD =2 District. The revised site plan conformed to all other setback requirements. The Commission voted to recommend denial of the proposed rezoning citing the lack of conformance with setback requirements. 7. The proposed rezoning was next heard by Commission at its August 27, 1986 meeting. The site plan continued to illustrate a 15 unit townhouse proposal. The revised plan conformed to all setback requirements of the Ordinance. The Commission voted to recommend approval of the proposed rezoning. 8. A public hearing was scheduled before the Council on September 15, 1986. Notice of the meeting was published in the Edina Sun-Current and notice was mailed to property owners within 500 feet of the subject property. A representative of Viking Hills Homeowners Association testified stating the following concerns: A. Increased traffic on Vernon Avenue generated by the development. B. The density of the development relative to neighi,oring single family developments. C. The protection of the open space immediately north of the subject property. D. Alteration to the hill and the need for retaining walls caused by the development. After hearing testimony by neighbors and proponent the Council continued the proposed rezoning to its October 6, 1986 meeting. 9. The Zoning Ordinance establishes the following minimum standards for the PRD =2 Planned Residence District: Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit Maximum Building Coverage Front Street Set Back Interior Side Yard Setback Rear Yard Set Back 7,200 square feet 25 per cent 30 feet 20 feet 35 feet The proposal for rezoning complies with requirements established by the Ordinance. 10. The subject property is designated as suitable for low density attached residential by the Edina Comprehensive Plan (the "Plan "). The Plan defines Low Density Attached Residential as follows: "This designation is intended to include two family dwellings, townhouses and other multi = family developments containing a maximum of four units per building or structure. Single family dwellings may also be a compatible use in such areas. It is intended that this designation will provide a variety of housing types in family residential areas an, between single family areas intensive uses. Although a is noted, maximum densities single family densities." relatively close proximity to single 3 will represent a transitional use and high volume roadways or more maximum of 6 dwelling units per acre will be influenced by surrounding 11. The Environmental Protection Element of the Plan contains the following objective: "Protect the lands, waterbodies, and watercourses of Edina from erosion, sedimentation, slippage, and vegetation removal from inappropriate uses of steep slopes." The proposed development includes retaining walls behind the most easterly 3 buildings. Portions of the hill above the retaining wall will also be altered by the development. 12. According to the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Handbook, 1976, between 1 and 12 trips per day per unit for multi= family developments are generated with an average of 6.1 trips per unit per day. Local studies have indicated a trip generation range of 6 to 8 trips per day for developments such as the proposed development. Therefore, the proposed 15 unit development could be expected to generate between 90 and 120 trips per day. 13. The subject property abuts City open space referred to as Krahl Hill. Krahl Hill was acquired by the City with $35,000 in financial assistance from the Viking Hills Homeowners Association to protect the hill and its natural vegetation. 14. The Zoning Ordinance Minnesota State Statute require that petitions for rezoning be granted only if they receive an affirmative vote of four = fifths of all members of the Council. Therefore, based upon the foregoing findings the City Council does hereby make the following: DECISION The proposed rezoning as presented to the Council on September 15, 1986 is hereby denied. The above decision is made for the following reasons. REASONS 1. The density is too great and the unit sizes too large for the subject property. Fewer, smaller units would eliminate the need for alteration of the existing steep slopes on the property. 2. The proposed development will aggravate the existing traffic problems on Vernon Avenue. 3. Although the proposed density (4.7 units per acre) is within the limits established by the Low Density Attached Residential Land Use Designation of the Comprehensive Plan a further reduction in density is warranted due to the proximity of single family homes to the north and northeast of the subject property. 4. The City made a commitment to the neighborhood to protect the open space represented by Krahl Hill when it acquired the property. The size of the units, location and number of units proposed could negatively impact the slopes and vegetation of the open space area. GLENN G.NYSECK GORDON V.JOHNSON JOHN K. BOUOUET JAMES VAN VALKENBURG MARK G.OHNSTAD DONALD D. SMITH MARSH J. HALBERG DENNIS M.PATRICK JOHN R. PRAETORIUS THOMSEN,NYBECK, JOHNSON, BououET & VAN VALKENBURG,P.A. LAW OFFICES SUITE 102 72SO FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS IEDINAI,MINNESOTA 55435 16121 83S -7000 Mr. Craig Larsen City Planner City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Craig: October 15, 1986 RE: Robert E, Hanson Z -U0 6 -1 Our File # 86- 6 -004A I acknowledge yours with the proposed Findings in regard to the above, and would like to comment thereon. I understand that you have sheet # 5 of David C. Darrell, Inc's. plans which illustrate the hill behind the proposed development and that you will furnish those drawings to the members of the Council prior to the October 20th meeting. As additional Findings of Fact I would suggest the follow- ing be added: 15. This property faces the Crosstown Highway and no other buildings will be built between it and the Highway as that property is owned by the Highway Department. OF COUNSEL HELGE THOMSEN RICHARD D. WILSON, P.A. JACK W. CARLSON STEVEN J.OUAM ROBERT E.2ECK 16. To the Southwest of subject property are five units in one building of townhouses; to the East are eleven buildings, each of which is at least a double and they are substantial in size; that Northwest of this pro- perty are townhouses on a five unit to the acre density and they are much closer and visable to the subject pro- perty than Viking Hills Development. Mr. Craig Larsen -2- October 15, 1986 17. The road easement for Vernon Court was all taken from Mr. Hanson's property and he will be paying for the entire road without any help from anyone across the street as is normal, and accordingly the size and value of the proposed development is necessary to make this project economic. There was discussion at the various hearings,as indicated by your Findings,regarding setback. In order to meet the setback requirements of the Ordinance Mr. Hanson will have to take more of the hill. 18. The so- called Krahl Hill is north of our property and we will cut into that a very little bit as indicated on sheet # 5. We are not proposing a great excavation and one large wall which would not only be unattractive, but could be a safety factor. The property will be terraced and in fact Mr. Hanson has suggested that as a part of his dedication that the rear or northerly 20 feet be dedicated to the park to further protect both the hill and subject property. As I look at sheet # 1 which is the site plan it would appear that the property at Vernon Court has an elevation of 908 and 910. The highest part of our property would appear to be approximately 980. That is not the top of the hill. Facetiously,a building could be built there that would be nine stories high (at 8 feet per floor) and it still would not be as high as the hill and not be viewed by the Viking Hills neighbors. In addition there is no road access from our property into the Viking Hills area. The Homeowners Association ih this development will maintain the hill, and the lawn, shovel and paint the exterior. Referring specifically to the Findings that you have prepared, I would like to comment on Finding.# 8. a. As to traffic on Vernon Avenue, some of the traffic from subject property would go on Vernon Avenue and some would follow Lincoln Drive to get to Highway 18. There would be no more traffic here then if this were zoned R -2 or if it were a single family. b. Density. This property is approximately 139,000 square feet which could potentially hold 9 double units at 15,000 square feet a unit, or 19 townhouses at 7200 square feet a unit. Our proposal is for 15 units and thus not as dense as the Ordinance permits. In addition Mr. Craig Larsen -3- October 15, 1986 to the density comments, the neighboring property as referred to above, both to the east, the south- west and the northwest are as dense or more then we are suggesting. c. Open space: We are suggesting that we add to it and feel that our treatment of that hill will add to the open space and not aggrevate it. d. Alteration of the hill. We are not affecting the publically owned property but all adjustments because of the hill in the form of the three retaining walls suggested are on subject property. We are not suggesting a large cut and then a large 15 to 20 foot retaining wall. The highest retaining wall we are proposing is approximately 5 to 6 feet. The 3 mini- mum size walls are primarily in place to protect the hill from erosion and beautification. 10. You have confirmed that our property conforms to both the Ordinance and the comprehensive plan and we feel that it would be a substantial improvement and addition to the City. 11. Environmental Protection. It is our intention to develop the hill in such a way that it would protect that hill rather than one large retaining wall which could have an adverse affect. 12. Protection of Krahl Hill. The open space concept of Krahl Hill would be further protected by our plan and by our suggestion that a part of our park dedication be in an area to the north of approximately 20 feet running approxi- mately the entire width of the property owned by Mr. Hanson. to elevation 922 (east to west) behind the northwest corner of the 2nd unit from the west. This is 8700 square feet. A visual inspection is better than words to describe what is intended for this property. To achieve this, Mr. Hanson or I will be delighted to show you or any councilmember, individually or collectively, this site, together with his plans. You may call Mr. Hanson at 922 -5224, or myself at 835 -7000 or 922 -2982 and we will meet you there or pick you up and drive you there. Mr. Craig Larsen -4- October 15, 1986 I would appreciate it if you would send sheet # 5 to the members of the Council with copies of this letter for their October 20th hearing. Y�V1 " ames Van Valk urg JVV:jd cc: Mr. Robert Hanson Mr. C. Wayne Courtn Council Members Mr. Kenneth Rosland % 11 LOCATION MAP.,T,,, O, �I�lIIS�:iC, � � � �.. �s ■aye■ o _� K . ■ ,i�o ills SUBDIVISION NUMBER S -86 -7 L O C A TI O N Generally located west of Gleason Road and north of Valley View Road REQUEST To create one new buildable lot. EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 1, 1986 AT 7:30 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman William Lewis, Jane Paulus, Virginia Shaw, John Palmer, David Runyan, Gordon Johnson, Del Johnson, Helen McClelland and John Bailey STAFF PRESENT: Craig Larsen, City Planner Jackie Hoogenakker, Secretary I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Mr. Palmer moved for approval of the September 3, 1986, Community Development and Planning Commission Meeting Minutes. Mr. Del Johnson seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried. II. NEW BUSINESS: S =867 Preliminary Plat Approval for Carroll Addition General. Location: West of Gleason Road and north of Valley View Road. Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the subject property contains 41,553 square feet and is developed with a single dwelling unit. Immediately to the north of the subject property is St. Albans Episcopal Church. All other surrounding uses are single family dwellings. Mr. Larsen added the owner of the subject property has submitted a request to subdivide the property in order to create one new buildable lot. The new lot would contain 19,346 square feet, and the lot for the existing dwelling would contain 22,207 square feet. Both lots would exceed ordinance requirements for lot width, lot depth and lot area. The existing dwelling would maintain the required 10 foot setback from the new property line. Mr. Larsen pointed out lots along this section of Valley View Road vary significantly in size and shape. Lot sizes range from approximately 13,000 square feet to over 40,000 square feet for this parcel and one other. Lots to the south and east are generally smaller and lots to the west are larger than those proposed here. The proposed lots front on Valley View and should be evaluated in light of conditions on Valley View Road. They do not relate to or impact lots to the west in Indian Hills. The proposed subdivision is similar to the lots created by Arrowhead Ridge and Merit Ridge, subdivisions just to the south along Valley View Road. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends preliminary plat approval conditioned upon: 1. Final Plat Approval. 2. Subdivision Dedication. The proponents, Mr. and ?ors. Carroll were present. Mr. Runyan asked Mr. and Mrs. Carroll their plans for the existing dwelling. Mr. Carroll told the Commission the property has belonged to Mrs. Carroll's family for a number of years. Their plan is to renovate the existing home and sell the proposed lot. Mr. Palmer moved for preliminary plat approval. Mr. Runyan seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried. III. ADJOURNMENT: Mrs. Shaw moved for adjournment at 7:40 p.m. Mr. Gordon Johnson seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Is COMMUNITY DEVELOP.MENT AND PLANNING CO`:MISSION OCTOBER 1, 1986 STAFF REPORT 5 -86 -7 Preliminary Plat Approval -for Carroll Addition General Location: West of Gleason Road and north of Valley View Road. Refer to: Attached preliminary plat and letter from property owner The subject property contains 41,553 square feet and is developed with a single dwelling unit. Immediately to the north of the subject property is St. Albans Episcopal Church. All other surrounding uses are single family dwellings. The owner of the subject property has submitted a request to subdivide the property in order to create one new buildable lot. The new lot would contain 19,346 square feet, and the lot for the existing dwelling would contain 22,207 square feet. Both,,;lots would exceed ordinance requirements for lot width, lot depth and lot area. The existing dwelling would maintain the required 10 foot setback from the new property line. Recommendation Lots along this section of Valley View Road vary significantly in size and shape. Lot sizes range from approximately 13,000 square feet to over 40,000 square feet for this parcel and one other. Lots to the south and east are generally smaller and lots to the west are larger than those proposed here. The proposed lots front on Valley View and should be evaluated in light of conditions on Valley View Road. They do not relate to or impact lots to the west in Indian Hills. The proposed subdivision is similar to the lots created by Arrowhead Ridge and Merit Ridge, subdivisions just to the south along Valley View Road. Staff recommends preliminary plat approval conditioned upon: 1. Final Plat Approval. 2. Subdivision Dedication. 6800 Valley View Road Edina, MN 55435 September 21, 1986 Mr. Craig Larsen Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Subdivision, 6800 Valley View Road Dear Craig, The above referenced property has been in my wife's family for approximately 45 years. Our family consists of five people living in this small two bedroom house. This leaves us severely limited for space. If we could split and sell about 1/2 of the property, we would be able to upgrade our home with enough livable space to accom- modate us all. The proposed subdivision would make each parcel approximately 1/2 acre. We feel with a new home on one parcel and the expansion and remodeling of our existing home, it would enhance the neighbor- hood and benefit all. We look forward to working with you and welcome your questions and comments. Sincerely, VJ�ohn T., Jr. Pd 0,(' C,,. Mary B. Carroll - - - - - - - - - - - In W- Al 40, 0 0 PRELIMINARY. PLAT FOR 0, 9 'so 0,0 z "t -%2A 40 CARROLL ADDITION .0 30' <</ OWNIN: John Carroll; Jr, gem valley view Road Edina. M $5415 . Ltoal: Part of Sgt 40, Auditor's SubdiVision humber 196 144014pin County. tllnnssota ly G HG ET —1 OF I hereby certify that this Survey. Plan• or report.' ,, prepared by be or under sly direct supervi 11 on an d hit a. a duly A II t Land nd Surveyor under the Lar f the tato P Minnesota. nesotat. Pate Reg. No. $140 brand! angineecling A mwaying • 2705 woods ball butnirwille, minnaloto 55337 N '(612) 435-1966 \ 1 / \ \ a\ \ 930 SHEET 2 0�7 Z brood! anginaaring @ iuruaying 2705 woods !roil burniullla. minnaioto 55 337 � � (614) 4351066 G31 -I-1�6 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council ROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: October 16, 1986 Material Description (General Specifications): One New Sidewalk Plow Quotations /Bids: Company 1. Road Machinery & Supplies Co., Inc. 2. McQueen Equipment Co., Inc. Boyum Equipment Co., Inc. Department Recommendation: jrzy Funds provided through New Equipment Capital Plan Approval Amount of Quote or Bid $ 28,352.00 (Used equipment does not meet specs) $ 33,870.00 $ 41.631.00 McQueen Equipment Co. Inc. $ 33,870.00 Road Machinery bid rejected bacause it was a demostrator model and no longer a product line being cared by that company. 'tionally a horsepower rating was much lower. Publ i p Works - St -re, Sig a re Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is X is not City anager's Endorsement: within the amount budget for the purchase. - (2� zz_,�') John Wallin, Finance Director 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: Kenneth Rosland, City _anager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE -TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: October 16, 1986 Material Description (General Specifications): One New Street Sweeper Quotations /Bids: Company 1. McQueen Equipment Co., Inc. 2. Itasca Equipment Co. 1. Department Recommendation: Funds provided through Equ#mmt Replacement Plan Amount of Quote or Bid $63,265.00 � : __0 McQueen Equipment Co., Inc. $63,265.00 (Two other potential bidders did not bid) Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is is not ITAin , . Department within the amount budget for the purchase. n Wallin, Finance Director City A ager's Endorsement: /1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: Kenneth Rosland, City er -v MINUTES TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE OCTOBER 14, 1986 9:00 A.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Fran Hoffman, Chairman Alison Fuhr Gordon Hughes Lois Coon Craig Swanson MEMBERS ABSENT: None OTHERS PRESENT: Captain Leonard Kleven; Edina Police Department David Higgins, 5700 Warden Avenue James Y. Smith, 6705 Normandale Helen Smith, 6705 Normandale SECTION A Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified, and the Council's authorization of recommended action. 1. Discuss pedestrian and bicycle safety on Normandale Road (East Frontage Road) from West 66th Street to West 70th Street. Request received from four local residents. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. James Smith addressed the Committee requesting the restriping of the East Frontage Road to create a "safety lane" for pedestrians and bicycles. He suggested the low volume of traffic and the adequate width of the road- way would permit this action. Mr. Smith added that there were 19 homes along the Frontage Road and this action would promote their safety. Mr..Hoffman suggested that restriping could be done by retaining two traffic lanes and a narrow, approximately four (4) foot, safety lane. Mr. Hughes questioned the possible need for two (2) lanes between West 70th Street and West 69th Street and then one (1) lane north of West 69th Street to West 66th Street. Captain Kleven stated there is occasional use of parking spaces near Payton Court. Mr. Hughes moved that the East Frontage Road be restriped north of West 69th Street to West 66th Street establishing a single lane for traffic, and east side markings for pedestrians and bicycles. Mrs. Fuhr seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES October 14, 1986 Page 2 (Continued) 2. Discuss traffic concerns at 5500 block of Benton Avenue (pond area). Continued from September meeting for traffic study. ACTION TAKEN: See September 9, 1986 Traffic .Safety Committee Minutes. Captain Kleven reported to the Committee that both speed surveys and traffic observation had been conducted. Over 90% of traffic in the area was at or below the 30 mph limit and enforcement of speed violations would not be practical. He also stated that the roadway is very difficult to drive at 30 mph and causes considerable tire squeal and vehicle noise that may contribute to the perception of speed along the roadway. Captain Kleven further stated that in the northwest quadrant, several vehicles have left the roadway causing damage.. Lastly, vegetation which causes sight distance problems will be trimmed in the near future. Mr. Hoffman suggested that solutions along the northwest quadrant could include reflective markers, post and chain barriers, or the addition of portable curbing. These solutions would also serve as protection to the sidewalk along the roadway. Mrs. Fuhr moved that the Public Works Department be instructed to take action to install the appropriate warnings or barriers along the Northwest and Southeast quadrants of the Benton Avenue Pond area. Mrs. Coon seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 3. Request for "NO PARKING" sign at 5105 West 49th Street (West 49th Street and Westbrook Lane). Request received from Lieutenant Jay Brask, Edina Police Department. ACTION TAKEN: The Committee discussed the merits of the suggested "NO PARKING" sign. The location, on a 90 degree convergence with Westbrook Drive, would promote safety. Mr. Swanson moved that the Committee recommend the installation of a "NO PARKING" sign at 5105 West 49th Street. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. -- Motion- carried 5 -0. - - - - - - - -- - - TRAFFIC SAFETY OOMMITTEE MINUTES October 14, 1986 Page 3 (Continued) SECTION B Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request. 1. Request for installation of three -way "STOP" signs at West 78th-Street and Cahill Road. Continued from September meeting for traffic study. ACTION.TAKEN: Captain Kleven restated the accident history of the intersection: 1983 - 6 accidents 1984 - 8 accidents 1985 - 3 accidents 1986 - 7 accidents He described these accidents as being caused by "failure to yield" viola- tions by drivers on Cahill Road. Mr. Hoffman suggested that there were two options to the accident problem: (1) Installation of a traffic signal at East Bush Lake Road and West 78th Street, as proposed,and approved by Hennepin County, and (2) Installation of "STOP" signs as warranted by the accident history. The Committee noted that this issue had been discussed during 1984 and 1985 and no action was taken pending the Hennepin County signal installation plans. The comment from those discussions was the concern that "STOP" signs in conjunction with signalization would be inconsistent with proper traffic control planning. Captain Kleven reported that observations of the intersection during rush hours did cause certain back -ups and delays; however, neither were excessive. The Committee surmized that impatient driving may be a contributing factor to accidents. Mr. Hoffman reported that a consultant is currently being retained for study of the East Bush Lake Road intersection. Mr. Hughes moved that the Committee recommend denial of the request for a three -way "STOP" sign, and the consultant be requested to determine if signalization at Cahill Road is appropriate or make any other additional suggestions. Mr. Swanson seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0. SECTION C Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others. 1. Discuss traffic safety concerns on Tracy Avenue and Warden Avenue. Request received from David Higgins,.5700 Warden Avenue. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES October 14, 1986 Page 4 . (Continued) ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Higgins cited the problem of excessive speed along Tracy Avenue near Warden Avenue. He also stated that speed compounds sight - distance .problems caused by grades of the roadway. He and neighbors have discussed solutions, one of which being the installation of a "STOP" sign on Tracy Avenue. Mr. Higgins further states that an .extreme hazzard exists when vehicles overtake (pass) other vehicles both north and southbound. He suggested that many "near miss" accidents have occurred although no actual accidents are known. Captain Kleven reported no reportable accidents in the area and no speed survey has yet been conducted. Mr. Hoffman stated that the area, urban and residential, should not normally.be thought of as an area where passing might be permitted. Also, he reported that at 30 mph the sight - distance is adequate. Mrs. Fuhr moved that the Committee recommend the striping of a double- yellow centerline on Tracy Avenue and that the request be continued for one month pending the results of a speed survey. Mrs. Coon seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. 2. Discuss traffic concerns on Vernon Avenue, Interlachen Boulevard to Hennepin County Highway 62. Requested by Council members. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Hoffman summarized the Planning Commission and City Council's action related to the Namron Corporation development. The Committee discussed the history of its actions on Vernon Avenue and the results of previous studies of the roadway. It was the consensus of the Committee that the primary factor on Vernon Avenue that would promote safety would be the reduction of the speed limit. Mr. Swanson moved that the Committee recommend that the City Council pass a resolution requesting Hennepin County conduct a survey of Vernon Avenue with the intent to lower the posted 40 mph speed limit. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. Respectfully submitted, EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE �ZJ J C RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Vernon Avenue between Highway 100 and Gleason Road is County Road 158; and WHEREAS, citizens adjacent to and in nearby residential areas are concerned about the speed of traffic on Vernon Avenue; and WHEREAS, said citizens have appeared before the Edina Community Development and Planning Commission and the Edina City Council with their concerns; and WHEREAS, the current speed limit on C.S.A.H. 158 is 40 MPH on the majority of the roadway; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council requests that Hennepin County reduce the speed limit on C.S.A.H. 158 from 40 MPH to a lower limit. ADOPTED this 20th day of October, 1986. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 20, 1986. City Clerk MEMORANDUM DATE: October 17, 1986 TO: Mayor and Council Members FROM: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: Fees Approved by Resolution The approval of the proposed changes in fees contained in the following two schedules require a resolution from the Council. Fee Schedule A contains the fees and charges that the Park Board is recommending for 1987. Fee Schedule B contains the proposed changes in Ambulance fees for 1987. These fees are based on a relationship to the Level I services. The proposed changes are comparable to Hennepin County's rates and Medicare reimbursement. The additional charge noted is a new fee. In the past, charges were tied strictly to whether a victim was transported. The new fee is for a,medicai procedure performed even though the individual is not transported. (i.e administer drugs) . v a MEMORANDUM DATE: October 17, 1986 TO: Mayor and Council Members FROM: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: Fees Approved by Resolution The approval of the proposed changes in fees contained in the following two schedules require a resolution from the Council. Fee Schedule A contains the fees and charges that the Park Board is recommending for 1987. Fee Schedule B contains the proposed changes in Ambulance fees for 1987. These fees are based on a relationship to the Level I services. The proposed changes are comparable to Hennepin County's rates and Medicare reimbursement. The additional charge noted is a new fee. In the past, charges were tied strictly to whether a victim was transported. The new fee is for a,medicai procedure performed even though the individual is not transported. (i.e administer drugs) . v Aquatic Instruction RENTALS $ 20.00 18.00 $ 17.00 Braemar Ballfields: $35 /hr - no lights $55 /hr - with lights General Park Areas: $50 /hr - commercial use (i.e.,TV Commercials) Picnic Shelters: $35 up to 50 people $65 over 50 people (Lake Cornelia Park ) Showmobile: $550 /day Rental of Athletic Field: $30 /game $50 /game with lights Portable Bleachers: $100 /day or $50 /hr. + Delivery Charge. Recreational Picnic Equipment - free usage Tupa Park $125 /day MK 9/30/86 SCHEDULE A EDINA PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT FEES AND CHARGES /OTHER THAN BY ORDINANCE Park and Recreation 1987 1986 1985 Playground $ 7.00 $ 6.00 $ 6.00 Dramatics and Theatre 20.00 18.00 17.00 T Ball 20.00 18.00 17.00 Tennis Instruction 20.00 18.00 17.00 Arena Single Hour Rate As of September $ 80.00 70.00 70.00 Contract Rate (10 or more hours) 75.00 67.50 67.50 Late Night - midnight or later 60.00 55.00 50.00 Open Skating 2.25 2.25 2.25 Skate Rental 1.06 1.06 1.06 Skate Sharpen 1.50 1.50 1.50 Summer Rental Pavilion: 500 /day Season Tickets (Eff. 10/1/87) Resident Family $ 52.00 52.00 50.00 Resident Individual 32.00 32.00 30.00 Non Resident Family 62.00 62.00 60.00 Non Resident Individual 37.00 37.00 35.00 Classes (as of January 1,1987) 40.00 35.00 35.00 Gun Range Pistol 1/2 hour $ 4.00 3.75 3.75 25 rounds trap 4.50 4.00 4.00 Building - per hour 45.00 40.00 40.00 Pool Season Tickets: Resident Family $ 44.00 40.00 37.00 Resident Individual 28.00 25.00 22.00 Non - resident Family 50.00 45.00 42.00 Non - resident Individual 33.00 30.00 27.00 Daily Admission: Adult $ 2.75 $ 2.50 $ 2.50 Youth 2.25 2.00 2.00 Aquatic Instruction RENTALS $ 20.00 18.00 $ 17.00 Braemar Ballfields: $35 /hr - no lights $55 /hr - with lights General Park Areas: $50 /hr - commercial use (i.e.,TV Commercials) Picnic Shelters: $35 up to 50 people $65 over 50 people (Lake Cornelia Park ) Showmobile: $550 /day Rental of Athletic Field: $30 /game $50 /game with lights Portable Bleachers: $100 /day or $50 /hr. + Delivery Charge. Recreational Picnic Equipment - free usage Tupa Park $125 /day MK 9/30/86 IWt 611=41 31M BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE FEES APPROVED BY PARK BOARD 1987 1986 Husband & Wife Additional Family Member Individual COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS LOCKERS Men's 72" Men's 42" Ladies 72" CLUB RENTAL PULL CARTS GOLF CARS 18 holes 9 holes GOLF CARS SENIORS 18 holes 9 holes GROUP GOLF LESSONS Adult Junior GOLF RANGE Large Bucket Small Bucket GREEN FEES 18 hole - non patron 18 hole - patron 9 hole - non patron 9 hole patron Seniors 18 hole - non patron 18 hole patron 9 hole - non patron 9 hole patron 1985 $85.00 $75.00 $75.00 40.00 35.00 35.00 45.00 40.00 40.00 10.00 8.00 6.25 30.00 20.00 12.00 4.50 1.50 30.00 18.00 12.00 4.50 1.50 30.00 18.00 12.00 4.50 1.50 17.00 16.00 16.00 9.00 8.50 8.50 14.00 13.00 12.00 7.50 7.00 6.00 42.00 40.00 38.00 22.00 20.00 20.00 3.25 3.25 2.25 2.25 12.00 11.50 9.00 8.50 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.50 11.00 8.00 7.00 5.50 GROUP FEES 15.00 GROUP CAR FEES 19.00 EXECUTIVE COURSE Adult - non patron 6.00 Adult - patron 5.00 Sr.& Jr. - non patron 5.00 Sr_.-&_-Jr. - patron 4.00 Golf Car - everyone 6.00 Pull Carts 1.50 Fees for the Braemar Room will remain unchanged. 10/3/86 10.50 7.50 6.50 5.00 14.00 18.00 3.00 2.00 11.00 8.00 6.50 5.00 10.00 7.00 6.00 4.50 13.00 18.00 3.75 2.75 2.50 1.75 SCHEDULE A i AMBULANCE FEES Ambulance Service, including medical treatment and /or transportation to a medical facility. Level Y -- Basic Life Support (BLS) Vital Signs Oxygen Splinting Backboard Bandaging Etc. Level II -- Advanced Life Support (ALS) I. V. Set -ups Drug Therapy E. K. G. Monitoring Mast Trousers Extrication Etc. Level III -- Code 3 Transports (ALS) Cardiac Arrest Any problem needing Code 3 Transport to hospital Additional Charge for transportation to downtown hospitals: Abbott /Northwestern Minneapolis Children's Medical Center Mt. Sinai Fairview (Lutheran) Deaconess Hennepin County Medical Center Metropolitan Medical Center Fairview Riverside /St. Mary's University of Minnesota North Memorial Medial Center Veteran's Administration Additional Charge for specialized medical services performed at scene with no transportation involved: Proposed 1987 1986 $225.00 $195.00 $275.00 $245.00 $325.00 $295.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 fe .. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: FEES AND CHARGES APPROVED BY ORDINANCE DATE: October 17, 1986 The attached schedule of fees reflects the staff's recommended increase for 1987. Should you approve of these proposed changes, we will then amend Ordinance, 1711, and those amendments would appear on your consent agenda for the November 3, 1986, meeting. Specifically, the changes that are being proposed are to cover.the City's cost in performing the various activities noted. Water rates (with the exception of the Morningside area and the east side of Beard AVenue from West 54th Street to Fuller Street and both sides of Abbott Place from 54th Street to Beard Avenue, which are hooked up to Minneapolis water) were last raised in July of 1980. I am proposing to increase water rates by 10% for anyone using City.of Edina water. The increase reflects inflation that has occured since 1980. Sewer rates were last increased in January of 1982. Since that time, the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has raised its collection and treatment charges from $1,692,060.00 to $2,221,529.89, an increase of over 31 %. In 1985, these charges amounted to over 55% of the total operating expenses for both water and sewer. Due to the increase, I propose that the sewer rates charged by the City of Edina be increased by 25 %. In the future, in order to alleviate increases of this size, the staff will investigate and if necessary propose increases on an annual basis. The following is a comparison of the current proposed water rates and the rates of two of our neighboring communities: St. Louis Richfield Edina Park 1986 1987 1986 1987 1000 Cu. Ft. Water, 4.48 8.30 8.40 6.00 6.60 Svc. Chrg. 3.59 2.95 3.00 Sewer 8.40 6.40 6.60 16.50 20.50 Other Chrg. 6.05 4.35 4.50 22.52 22.00 22.50 22.50 27.10 2000 Cu. Ft. Water 8.96 .16.60 16.80 6.00 6.60 Svc. Chrg. 3.59 2.95 3.00 Sewer 16'.80 12.80 13.20 16.50 20.50 Other Chrg. 6.05 4.35 4.50 35.40 36.70 37.50 22.50 27.10 October 17, 1986 Mayor Courtney and Council Members Page Two St. Louis Richfield Edina Park 1986 1987 1986 1987 3000 Cu. Ft. Water 13.44 24.90 25.20 9.00 9.90. " Svc. Charge 3.59 2.95 3.00 Sewer 25.20 19.20 19.80 26.25 32.75 Other Charge 6.05 4.35 4.50 " 48.28 35.25 42.65 51.40 52.50 Lastly, the staff is recommending the incorporation of the following fees into Ordinance 171. We have been collecting these fees under other ordinances, and to date they had not been placed in Ordinance 171. Fire pump installation and $45.00 associated hardware Standpipe installation $45.00 For each additional standpipe 5.00 Refund upon return of $2.00 per month, pro -rated parking permit sticker PROPOSED FEE CHANGES FOR 1987 Public or semi- public swimming pool license Public or semi - public whirlpool bath or thera- peutic swimming pool license Sprinkler permit fees: Number of Heads 1- 5 6- 25 26- 50 51 -200 200+ Food establishment Take -out facility Catering food establishment Packaged food sales Itinerant food establishment Readily perishable food vehicle Fleet of 5 or more readily perishable food vehicles Perishable food vehicle Fleet of 5 or more perish- able food vehicles Sewer rental Single family dwellings, town houses, two- family dwellings, apartment buildings containing four or less dwelling units: To and including 2,000 cubic feet From 2,001 to and including 4,000 cubic feet From 4,001 to and including 7,000 cubic feet $220.00 per annum for each pool enclosed part or all of year $120.00 per annum for each outdoor pool $45.00 per annum for each bath or pool $40.00 (minimum fee) $40.00 for first five, plus $22.00 for each additional ten or fraction thereof $84.00 for first 25, plus $17.00 for ach additional ten or fraction thereof $135.00 for first 50, plus $11.00 for each additional ten or fraction thereof $300.00 for first 200, plus $5.00 for each additional ten or fraction thereof $305.00 per annum ($255 certified) plus $75.00 per annum for each additional facility $205.00 per annum ($155 certified) $305.00 per annum ($255 certified) $95.00 per annum $40.00 per event $45.00 per annum $225.00 per annum $45.00 per annum $225.00 per annum Based upon water usage during winter quarter. (Three -month period falling between Nov. 1 and March 1.) $20.50 per quarter $32.75 per quarter $56.25 per quarter 1986 $210.00 115.00 40.00 35.00 35.00 20.00 75.00 15.00 120.00 10.00 270.00 5.00 235.00 65.00 140.00 235.00 85.00 30.00 35.00 175.00 35.00 175.00 $ 18.15 28,89 49.50 PROPOSED FEE CHANCES FOR 1987 1986 From 7,001 cubic feet $1.10 per 100 cubic feet .98 and over Apartment buildings with $84.50 plus $15.50 for each 74.25 more than four dwelling unit over four, or $1.10 per 13.50 units hundred c. ft. of water used .96 during the quarter, whichever is greater Commercial and industrial $21.00 per water meter or 18.56 buildings, including schools approved sewage metering device on .98 and churches premises, or $1.10 per hundred cu. ft. of water used during the quarter, whichever is greater Water service A minimum charge of $2.20 per 2.00 month will be made where water consumption amounts to less The following flat annual charges: $2,500.00 - Park Department for 1,000.00 water used for sprinkling and skating rinks Parking permit $2.00 per month, pro -rated 1.25 Solicitor's permit $15.00 3.00 Taxicab license $25.00 per annum 10.00 MEMORANDUM DATE: September 22, 1986 TO: Kenneth Rosland FROM: David A. Velde SUBJECT: Food Handler Training Over the last several months, the Health Department has become increasingly concerned about the sanitary conditions of the restaurants in Ldina. Routine maintenance has been reduced, shortcuts in food handling procedures have been implemented and the number of restaurants with failing inspection scores have increased. To respond to this general decline in food service quality we have considered several options. One option would increase the level of enforcement through the court system. This alternative would provide harsh sanctions through court fines for the restaurant but would provide little education. Another alternative which has been considered is an increased education effort provided by existing Health Department staff. This option could result in an increase in knowledge and awareness of potentially hazardous food handling procedures for the food establishment operators. However, this would require an additional time commitment by staff for the education of food service personnel. The Health Department, at present staffing levels, cannot afford to provide this training and still maintain the desired inspection frequency. A third approach would be to encourage voluntary participation in the quality assurance programs which are offered by Hennepin County and the Hospitality Institute of Technology and Management in St. Paul. These programs offer a course in safe food handling procedures and food operator certification. Both courses offer recertification every two years to ensure the operator is current with the latest developments in the food industry. To encourage participation in the quality assurance program, the City of Edina could increase the license fee for the affected restaurants by Fifty dollars ($50.00) per annum. If the licensed food establishment employs a certified employee the license fee would be reduced by $50.00. The certification would be applicable to licensed facilities in the following categories: Food Establishment; Take Out Facility; and Catering Food Establishments. The necessary Ordinance amendments are being prepared for City Council adoption. Hopefully, the food service operators will take this opportunity to advance their knowledge of proper food handling procedures. _`E_ iui IIIL��� league of minnesota cities October 9, 1986 T0: Mayors, Manage s 'd Clerks FROM: Donald A. Sla x utive Director RE: Proposed policies and the policy adoption meeting Enclosed with this letter is a copy of the League of Minnesota Cities' 1987 Proposed City Policies and Priorities. Please consider them carefully and share them with other officials in your city. We are sending them out now, so you will have time to take formal action on them at a council meeting prior to the League's Policy Adoption Meeting on November 20, 1986. The Policy Adoption Meeting is in addition to the League's Legislative Conference which will be held on March 10, 1987. The League Board requested the change to boost participation in the policy adoption process and to give League lobbyists more time to prepare legislation before the session begins. _ The timing for policy adoption is only one of the changes in the process this year. The other major change was to bring up policy issues at the League's regional meetings so city officials could discuss the policies, offer comments, and express their opinions. League staff then took this information back to the policy committees for consideration. This gave more city officials a chance to mold the policies during the early stages of policy development. And, from the comments on the regional meeting surveys, League members appreciated this opportunity. Again, please study the enclosed policies, and plan to attend the Policy Adoption Meeting on November 20, 1986 to vote on them. Remember, each city has a vote at that meeting. The Policy Adoption Meeting will be at the Sheraton - Midway Hotel in St. Paul, beginning at 10:00 am. (Registration opens at 9:00 am -- See attached information for details.) 1 83 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 [61 2] 227 -5600 We're doing things differentIN7 this IN %...A V • 'i6d W year ... What: The League will adopt legislative policies in November this Near, instead of at the beginning of the legislative session. Why: Adopting policies earlier will give League mem- bers and lobbyists an opportunity to contact legislators and draft legislation concerning policies before the ses- Sion begins. Where: The Pohcy Adoption Meeting kill be at the Sheraton Midway -St. Paul off of Hn-y. 94 (400 N. Hamline Ave.). %lien: Thursday, Nov. 20, 1986 at 9 a.m. Who: All member cities should tnr to attend. Each I city has a vote. Cost: There is no fee for this meeting. r 1 'i r 'p .O r- .J, i I I � ter 1 •tz 1�1 i Ii I October 1986 City: P L E A S E Agenda 9 -10 a.m. Registration (coffee and rolls) 9:15 -9:45 a.m. Pre - conference policv briefing 10 a.m. Policy adoption I ... lunch on your wwri ... There is no fee for this meeting. Legislative policy adoption meeting Thursday, November 20, 1986 Sheraton Midway St. Paul 400 North Hamline St. Paul, '-'.N 55104 Contact Person.: Telephone A.C. P R I K Name Title Address Zip Code T Send registration to Gayle Brodt, League of Minnesota Cities, 183 University Ave. East, St. Paul, MN 55101 %ZY Sheraton Alidway- SG Paul 400 North Hamline, St. Paul, Minnesota 55104 (612) 642 -1234 Name Representing Address City State Zip League of Minnesota Cities Novenber 20, 1986 To insure space/rate availability, please respond prior to Noverzx —r 1, 1936. Please Specify: $56.00 + Tax Single (One Person) $56.00 + Tax Double (M People) I errwe eHe• 4.00 P.M. Plesse puere ^rec nce reserrsr. on wi rh McNTH DAY I . YEAR ARRIVAL TIME I jM.ONTHI DAY YEAR ARRIVAL DATE DEPARTURE DATE (Credit Card) Number and E>pirer-on Dare CHECK IN TIME 3:00 PM ( ) CHECK OUT TIME 1:00 PM Telephone s 47 ( 1987 Proposed City Policies and Prl'*ol*tl*es For distribution to all member cities. All mayors, managers, and clerks receive a copy of the proposed policies. Please share this document with your councilmembers. LMC Legislative Study Committees have developed these policies and the LMC Legislative Committee is recommending them to the membership. Each policy has an A, B, or C, priority. An explanation of each level is in the Foreword. Please review these proposed policies before the 1987 Policy Adoption Meeting. City officials will adopt legislative policies at that meeting on Thursday, November 20, 1986 at the Sheraton - Midway, St. Paul. League of Minnesota Cities " "�L, Foreword One of the most important purposes of the League of Minnesota Cities is to serve as a vehicle through which cities can define common problems and develop policies and proposals to solve them. To accomplish this purpose, the League has a three -step process: First, legislative study committees of city officials study the issues and propose policies to address issues. They assign priorities according to importance. Second, the Leagues Legislative Committee reviews the policies and priorities and makes any changes the comittee members deem necessary. The Legislative Committee consists of the LMC Board of Directors and the chairs of the legislative study committees. Third, representatives of all member cities meet at the annual Policy Adoption Meeting to adopt the policies. Amendments to the policies are possible with a two - thirds majority of those voting on the issue. The policy statements and legislative proposals in this publication are the result of that process. They provide the LMC Board of Directors and staff with guidance when testifying before legislative committees and taking other actions with legislative or policy implications. Priority designation of the policy is in parentheses at the end of the policy title. The study committees developed the priorities and the Legislative Committee reviewed them and, in some cases, modified them. The priorities give additional guidance to the LMC Board and staff in implementing the League's legislative program. "A" priority indicates a major issue, where the League would introduce legislation or would work actively with other groups to seek new laws and regulations. "B" priority indicates items that are important to cities but where the League would probably spend substantially less time unless the Legislature or other groups mounted a major effort to which LMC had to respond. While the League might initiate legislation on B priority items, these would be relatively non - controversial items, or those where most of the research has already been completed. "C" priority indicates items where the League would respond only when other groups raise the issue. Policy Page Development-Strategies (Chair:.Mayor Mary Anderson, Golden Valley) DS -1. Tax Increment Financing (A) ... ............................... 3 DS -2. Economic Development Authorities.(A) ......................... 4 DS -3. Development Financing (A) ..... ............................... 5 DS -4. Housing (B) ................... ............................... 6 DS -5. Economic Development Funds (B) ............................... 7 DS -6. Municipal Service Districts (B) .............................. 8 DS -7. Community Development Principles (C) ......................... 9 DS -8. Tax - Exempt Status of Land Held by Cities for Development (C) ............ ............................... 10 DS -9. Small Cities Community Block Grant Program (C) ............... 11 Government Structure and General Legislation (Chair: Councilmember Larry Bakken, Golden Valley) GSGL -1. Tort Liability and Insurance (A) ........................... 14 GSGL -2. Open Meetings (A) ........... ............................... 16 GSGL -3. Mandates (B) ................ ............................... 17 GSGL -5. Purchasing Authority of Plan B Managers (B) ................ 19 GSGL -6. Towing of Abandoned Vehicles (B) ........................... 19 GSGL -7. State Licensing of Contractors (B) .......................... 20 GSGL -8. State Audits and City Financial Reporting Ground and Surface Water Management (B) ................... Requirements (B) ........... ............................... 20 GSGL -9. Government Training Service (B) ............................ 21 GSGL -10. Charitable Gambling Enforcement Fees (B) ................... 21 GSGL -11. Joint Powers Act (B) ........ ............................... 21 GSGL -12. Cable Communications (B) ................................... 22 GSGL -13. Conflict of Interest /Incompatibility of Offices (B) ......... 22 GSGL -14. Absentee Balloting (B) ...... ............................... 23 GSGL -15. Precinct Boundary Changes (B) .............................. 23 GSGL -16. Uniform Local Government Election Day (B) .................. 24 GSGL -17. Campaign and Finance Disclosure (B) ........................ 25 GSGL -18. Voting Equipment (B) .................................... 25 GSGL -19. Election Day Registration and Administrative Improvements (B) ........... ............................... 26 GSGL -20. Optional Poll Hours (C) ..... ............................... 26 GSGL -21. City Election Campaigns (C) ................................ 27 GSGL -22. Primary Dates (C) ........... ............................... 27 GSGL -23. Verification of Petitions (C) .............................. 27 Land Use, Energy, Environment, and Transportation (Chair: Tom Eidem, City Administrator, Monticello) LUEET -1. Wastewater Treatment (A) .... ............................... 30 LUEET -2. Land Use, Planning, and Annexation (A) ..................... 32 LUEET -3 Solid and Hazardous Waste Management (B) .................. 33 LUEET -4 Transportation (B) ......... ............................... 35 LUEET -5 Ground and Surface Water Management (B) ................... 37 LUEET -6 Regulation of Pesticides and Other Chemicals (B) .......... 38 LUEET -7 Eminent Domain Law (C) ..... ............................... 39 LUEET -8 Energy Conservation and Production (C) .................... 40 Policy Page Personnel and Public Safety (Chair: Pete Stolley, Administrator, Municipal Bonds (A) ........... ............................... Northfield) RS -2. PPS -1. Veterans' Preference (A) ..... ............................... 44 PPS -2. Minnesota Public Employment Labor Relations Act (A) ......... 45 PPS -3. PERA Benefits, Financing, and Administration (B) ............ 47 PPS -4. Local Government Pay Equity Act (B) ......................... 50 PPS -5. Military Leaves (B) .......... ............................... 51 PPS -6. Time and Distance Residency Requirements (B) . ................ 51 PPS -7. Unemployment Compensation (B) ............................... 52 PPS -8. One Class of Beer (B) ........ ............................... 52 PPS -9. Firefighter Certification (B) . ............................... 53 PPS -10. Workers' Compensation (C) .... ............................... 53 PPS -11. Modifications to the State Building Code (C) ................ 54 PPS -12. Social Investing (C) ......... ............................... 54 PPS -13. Emergency Medical Services (C) .............................. 54 PPS -14. Ambulance Drivers -- Training for Drivers (C) ............... 55 Revenue Sources (Chair: Mayor Sig Steve, Lindstrom) RS -1. Municipal Bonds (A) ........... ............................... 59 RS -2. Special Assessment Financing (A) ............................. 60 RS -3. State Administrative Costs (A) ............................... 61 RS -4. Property Tax Reform ........... ............................... 62 RS -5. Local Government Aids (B) ..... ............................... 63 RS -6. State Funding to Cities (B) ................................... 64 RS -7. Elimination of Levy I.,imits (B) ............................... 65 RS -8. Stability of Revenues (B) ..... ............................... 66 RS -9. Sales Ratio Study (C) ......... ............................... 67 RS -10. License Fees (C) ... • ........ ............................... 67 RS -11. Equipment Financing (C) ....... ............................... 68 RS -12. Railroad and Telephone Taxation (C) .......................... 68 RS -13. Tax- Exempt Property (C) ....... ............................... 69 RS -14. Local Option Taxes (C) ........ ............................... 69 Federal Legislative (Chair: Councilmember Steve Cramer, Minneapolis) FL -1. Federal Tax Policy: Impact on Cities ......................... 73 FL -2. General Revenue Sharing (GRS) . ............................... 75 FL -3. Targeted Fiscal Assistance .... ............................... 76 FL -4. Federal Deficit Reduction ..... ............................... 77 FL -5. Low- and Moderate - Income Housing ............................. 78 FL -6. Homelessness ................... ............................... 79 FL -7. Medicare Deductions for City Employees ........................ 80 FL -8. Mandates ...................... ............................... 81 FL -9. Stormwater Permits ............ ............................... 82 FL -10. Superfund ..................... ............................... 83 FL -11. State and Local Pipeline Safety Council ...................... 84 uu UHII U league of minnesota cities Policy DS -1 DS -2 DS -3 DS -4 DS -5 DS -6 DS -7 DS -8 DS -9 Title Tax Increment Financing Economic Development Authorities Development Financing Housing Economic Development Funds Municipal Service Districts Community Development Principles Tax - Exempt Status of Land Held by Cities for Development Small Cities Community Block Grant Program Priority A A A B B B C C C 1 83 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 (61 2) 227 -5600 -1- DS -1. Tax Increment Financing (A) The League recommends that tax increment financing remain available for cities. Cities are willing to work with the Legislature to improve the program, as well as correct any problems with tax increment financing. Tax increment finance has permitted many cities in various parts of the state to define and carry out rehabilitation, redevelopment, housing, and economic development projects on their own initiative. It represents the most feasible and effective legal strategy which is currently available to cities to preserve and improve their physical and economic environment. In view of the dramatic reductions in federal assistance for development and housing, tax increment finance remains one of the few options available for cities to promote growth and development in their cities. The League opposes volume limits or penalities for municipal use of tax increment finance. Should the Legislature decided that particular tax increment finance practices should be modified, those practices should be dealt with through specific proposals rather than the establishment of a volume limitation. - 3- DS -2. Economic Development Authorities (A) The League supports legislation which would provide city economic development authorities with the same power and authority as certain cities have been granted in special port authority acts. The League believes that it is unfair and unreasonable to grant greater authority and power to some cities in the economic development field and requests the following legislative changes accordingly: 1. Authorize all cities to designate economic development areas anywhere within their jurisdiction, not as present law provides requiring that economic development areas be continguous and meet the tax increment finance redevelopment /blighted area test. 2. Authorize the issuance of debt with respect to project activities within economic development districts without a referendum. 3. Authorize a separate levy of .75 mills for economic development purposes. 4. Authorize the economic development authority to build buildings or structures on land owned by the authority. -4- DS -3. Development Financing (A) The League supports the continued use of industrial development bonds and other tax - exempt instruments as development tools. The following principles should apply to the allocation of tax - exempt development authority: 1. A maximum of Minnesota tax - exempt development allocation authority being retained by municipalities. 2. The maintenance of local discretion and flexibility in development decisinns_ 3. The minimization of state control of local development decisions. Tax - exempt financing allows cities to undertake a diverse range of activities to prevent economic deterioration, to attract new businesses and jobs, to retain existing businesses and jobs, and to maintain and strengthen the local tax base. Pending federal tax legislation would substantially change the applicability of tax - exempt development financing. Should the state become involved in designing a new system appropriating tax - exempt bond authority to cities, the League recommends that the above three principles apply, in general, and that the League be centrally involved with the governor and the Legislature in fashioning an equitable system. -5- DS -4. Housing (B) The League of Minnesota Cities supports legislation that preserves and improves the financing tools available to cities for the construction and rehabilitation of housing. Federal tax reform legislation as well as substantial cuts in HUD housing programs have dealt a severe blow to many cities' housing efforts. State legislation preserving existing tools such as tax exempt finance, interest rate write down, and taxable options in tax increment and revenue bonding are more important than ever. In addition, new legislation providing cities with new resources must be considered. Cities recognize that incentives for the construction and rehabilitation of housing form a vital part of city redevelopment efforts and serve the housing needs of its citizens, especially those of low and moderate incomes. The League also supports new legislation which includes specialized opportunities for small communities to participate in state housing and development programs. The League, in general, supports amendments to Chapter 462C necessary to further assist cities in using housing revenue bond programs both as a redevelopment tool and as a way to provide housing for low- and moderate - income households. As for the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA), program funds should be targeted to cities in a manner consistent with local plans and programs. The MHFA should continue to improve its procedure whereby representatives of a diverse group of cities, chosen in consultation with the League, can participate in targeting funds to cities. am DS -5. Economic Development Funds (B) The League supports legislation authorizing cities to use general funds or bond proceeds to establish funds for the promotion of economic development activities within the city. Recently cities have sought special legislation to establish special funds intended to be used to promote economic growth within their communities. These "capital seed funds ", are financed either through general fund monies or general obligation bond proceeds. Cities have used them for the purposes of making grants, loans, and other development activities. -7- DS -6. Municipal Service Districts (B) The League supports legislation which would allow cities to create municipal service districts. Cities should be allowed to finance the types of improvements listed in M.S. 429.021 (relating to the construction, replacement, and maintenance of such things as streets, sidewalks, gutters, storm and sanitary sewers, waterworks systems, street lights, and public malls, parking, or courtyards). Both service charges and ad valorem property taxes should be available to. finance services or capital improvements in the district Recent court decisions concerning special assessments have made it more difficult for cities to use special assessments to finance public services and improvements. The Minnesota Supreme Court has interpreted the state Constitution to require not only that a special assessment project "specially benefit" affected parcels of property, but also that the city be able to prove that the market value of a property will increase in direct relation to the amount of the special assessment applied to that property. This interpretation has created particular problems for several important city functions. First, it is more difficult to assess all (or even part) of a capital improvement project to repair or replace, as opposed to newly built improvements. This hinders cities from meeting the widely recognized need for maintenance of the existing public infrastructure. Second, cities' ability to finance annual operating and maintenance costs of some services to property through the use of special service charges is either unclear or non - existent under current law. The only current financing alternative to special assessments or service charges is the general property tax. But it may not be desirable to use the general property tax to finance some capital or operating expenses. For example, if a road is used almost exclusively by people living in one corner of a city, it may be bad public policy to require the cost of replacing that road to be borne by all the property in the city. This is especially true if the property in the rest of the city has already been assessed for similar improvements. Or, if the central business district or mall of a city benefits from more frequent snowplowing or street cleaning, better lighting, etc. it may not be good policy to have all the city taxpayers share in those expenses. S DS -7. Community development Principles (C) The League supports legislation which continues state assistance to cities for community and economic development. The League encourages the Legislature to appropriate funds for direct assistance to business for economic development. As a matter of principle, the state should not encourage the use of such direct assistance for the sole purpose of moving businesses from one Minnesota city to another. Technical assistance should be furnished by the appropriate state agencies to aid cities in promoting local development activities. Minnesota cities have traditionally been responsible for their own economic growth. During the '60s and '70s, cities promoted development through the use of industrial revenue bonds, tax increment financing, and housing (or mortgage revenue) bonds. Substantial federal grant programs supplemented local resources. The economic realities of the 1980s require even greater efforts by cities in community and economic development. As federal assistance disappears, cities are forced to become more creative in the use and leveraging of available resources. In recent years, the state has assisted cities' development efforts through legislation and agency- administered programs, including Minnesota Main Street, Star Cities, Minnesota Housing Finance Agency loan programs, and small business rehabilitation loan programs. State legislation must continue to provide maximum flexibility for cities to carry out community development activities. Additionally, the state must actively promote economic development through direct assistance to businesses and more extensive technical assistance to maximize cities' ability to leverage local, state, and federal resources. Any proposed community and economic development legislation should respond to the followine concerns: 1. Protection of cities' ability to finance capital improvements; 2. Management of economic growth to maximize cities' existing capital investment; 3. Revitalization of cities reversing the trend of dispersion of population and economic activity; 4. Recognition and allowance for the great differences between cities regarding their stages of growth and development, demographics, and types of economic activity within and adjacent to their borders; and 5. The Legislature should enable the Small Business Finance Agency to package projects which are approved by local city councils into larger industrial revenue bonds. DS -8. Tax - Exempt Status of Land Held by Cities for Development (C) The League supports granting unlimited tax - exempt status.to property held by cities and their political subdivisions for later resale to promote economic development. Up until recently, almost all property owned by political subdivisions was granted tax - exempt status. In 1979, the Legislature changed the law to provide that property held by a political subdivision of the state for later resale for economic development purposes would be considered a public purpose and therefore tax - exempt for a maximum period of three years. In 1984, the Legislature revised the statute, providing tax - exempt status for a period of eight years in most situations and granting an exemption for an unlimited period of years if the property is held for housing programs or is classified as "blighted land" under state law. The 1984 law provides, however, that the property will be taxable if the property is acquired for economic development purposes, and building or other improvements are constructed after acquisition of the property, and if more than one -half of the floor space of the buildings or improvements available for lease to or use by a private individual, corporation, or other entity is leased to or otherwise used by a private individual, corporation, or other entity. The overall intent of the statute is to create an incentive for political subdivisions to engage in economic development activities as well as to promote moving the property back onto the tax rolls. Unfortunately, it does not fully recognize that the process of developing industrial and economic growth, rehabilitating, or building housing may extend over a long period of time. The uncertainty caused by the vague provision on improvements and leasing of one -half of the property discourages cities from being active in establishing and maintaining local development corporations, from retaining as much control as possible over their economic development and planning process, and from being selective as to the type of development which may occur in the city. Cities have every incentive to get property back on the tax rolls as soon as possible. Therefore, the League recommends that the provision concerning one -half installation of improvements be deleted or at the very least clarified, and that the eight -year limit on tax - exempt status be removed. -10- DS -9. Small Cities Community Block Grant Program (C) The League supports the state's continued administration of the Small Cities portion of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. The League also supports the continuation of the set - aside of federal funds for economic development grants and augmented state appropriations to supplement the federal funds set aside. The League discourages any legislative attempt to deal statutorily with complex, specific program criteria that are best handled administratively. The Small Cities CDBG program should continue as a source of funding which encourages cities to "develop viable communities by providing decent housing and suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunities, principally for purposes of low- and moderate - income," in compliance with congressional intent. The state should maintain the CDBG program balance between cities' economic development needs and the needs of low- and moderate - income people. Cities should retain maximum flexibility in determining how to carry out CDBG program objectives. -11- ILL111 league of minnesota cities Policy Priority GSGL -1 Tort Liability and Insurance A GSGL -2 Open Meetings A GSGL -3 Mandates B GSGL -5 Purchasing Authority of Plan B Managers B GSGL -6 Towing of Abandoned Vehicles B GSGL -7 State Licensing of Contractors B GSGL -8 State Audits and City Financial Reporting Requirements B GSGL -9 Government Training Service B GSGL -10 Charitable Gambling Enforcement Fees B GSGL -11 Joint Powers Act B GSGL -12 Cable Communications B GSGL -13 Conflict of Interest /Incompatibility of Offices B GSGL -14 Absentee Balloting B GSGL -15 Precinct Boundary Changes B GSGL -16 Uniform Local Government Election Day B GSGL -17 Campaign and Finance Disclosure B GSGL -18 Voting Equipment B GSGL -19 Election Day Registration and Administrative Improvements B GSGL -20 Optional Poll Hours C GSGL -21 City Election Campaigns C GSGL -22 Primary Dates C 1 80 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 (612)227-5600 -13- GSGL -1. Tort Liability and Insurance (A) The League supports legislation reducing the exposure of cities to civil lawsuits without unduly restrictinE an injured party from recovering compensation from negligent individuals and supports actions enuring the availability and affordability of insurance coverage for cities While many debate whether there has been an "explosion," it is fairly well established that the growth of tort litigation over the past several years has resulted in increasing liability for governmental entities, private businesses, and individual citizens. Additionally, business practices of insurance companies have played a significant role in the recent insurance crisis. The League supports reasonable reforms dealing with both sides of the liability insurance issue. The Municipal Tort Liability Act was enacted in 1963 to protect the public treasury while giving the citizen relief from the arbitrary, confusing, and administratively expensive prior doctrine of sovereign immunity with its inconsistent and irrational distinctions between governmental and proprietary activities. The,act has served that purpose well in the past. However, courts frequently forget or ignore the positive benefits secured to citizens damaged by public servants as a result of enactment of the comprehensive act which includes some limitations on liability and some qualifications of normal tort claims procedure. The special vulnerability of far -flung government operations to debilitating tort suits continues to require the existence of a tort claims act applicable to local governments or local governments and the state. The need for some type of limitations is evidenced by recent experiences with the insurance market. The 1986 Legislature responded to some of these concerns in enacting the 1986 Tort Reform Act, but the problems continue to exist and further action is necessary. The League recommends the following changes in the tort liability system: 1. The procurement of insurance should not constitute a waiver of any limitation or immunity provided by law except the dollar limitations and in that event the policy must expressly waive such limitation with specificity. 2. Punitive damages, intended to punish and deter egregious conduct, have not been effective because the standards of applicability have been too vague. The League does not oppose the total elimination of punitive damages, but would prefer that the Legislature specify that punitive damages may be awarded only when the conduct involved manifests malicious and flagrant indifference to safety, and places monetary limits on such awards. If however, the Legislature is unwilling to raise the standards for punitive damages, it must address the concern of city officers and employees who may be personally liable and cities should be given the option to either defend and indemnify or not to defend and indemnify its officers or employees for punitive damages claimed and levied against them. Such decisions must be made by the city within a reasonable time after being served with a summons and -14- GSGL -1. Tort Liability and Insurance (cont'd) (A complaint alleging conduct that may result in a punitive damage claim. The decision of the city should be inadmissable in any trial in which the claim of punitive damages is made. 3. The fault -based system of damage awards has apparently eroded. In order to facilitate the return to a fault -based system, joint liability should be abolished in cases where defendants have not acted in concert and a modified comparative fault system should be used to evaluate the actions of other persons involved with the injury and assess damages in proportion to the amount of each person's fault. If however, the Legislature is unwilling to do this, it should modify the 1986 legislative language dealing with joint liability to make it apply to all defendants or establish a legislative rationale for having it apply only to governmental entities. 4. In order to protect any enacted legislation from constitutional equal protection challenge, the Legislature should establish rationales defining the problem being addressed and the intent of the Legislature. -15- . GSGL -Z. Open Meetings (A) The League recommends that the Open Meeting Iaw be amended to conform to the Data Practices Act. City officials strongly support the basic premise of the Open Meeting Law - -to assure the public's right to be informed about the conduct of public business. Experience with this law since 1974, however, indicates clearly that there are areas where the legislation should be amended in the public interest. The League believes that there are certain specific instances where the public interest would be better served by permitting a local governing body to meet in executive or closed session. These instances include certain discussions relating to employees such as "hiring" interviews, discussions regarding the purchase or sale of land for a public purpose, and discussions of information protected under the Data Practices Act. These latter situations are particularly troublesome since it is often necessary for the council to choose between violating either the Open Meeting Law or the Data Practices Act. Additionally, the League opposes any legislative attempt to alter the recent court ruling that the Open Meeting I,aw applies only to meetings where a quorum of the governing body or its established committees is present. The ruling clarified the law which was often viewed as applying to any meeting between two office holders. Limiting the application of the law to gatherings of a quorum or more is a common sense approach to implementing the statute and should not be altered. -16- GSGI. -3. Mandates (B) The League opposes any additional mandates unless the Legislature provides adequate revenue sources to implement the law. One of the most serious problems facing cities is the growth in the number and cost of federal and state- mandated programs which substitute the judgments of Congress and the State Legislature for local budget priorities. Recent examples of costly mandated programs include comparable worth, employee right to know, legal compliance audits, and newspaper publications. Special bills to address this problem on an ad hoc basis have-not provided a permanent or statewide solution to these problems. The League therefore supports the 1985 legislation which requires the state to adopt a policy of deliberate restraint on its mandated programs, including providing a mandatory fiscal note identifying local government costs on any new mandated programs when they are introduced in the legislature and a statement of compelling statewide interest to accompany all state mandates. The League further supports the recently adopted Governor's Advisory Council on State and Local Relations recommended guidelines for mandating for the legislative and executive branches. Revenues or alternative revenue producing mechanisms, other than the general property tax subject to levy limits, must accompany new mandates. Also, the Legislature should repeal obsolete, unnecessary, and unduly restrictive mandatory laws and rules. -17- GSGL -4. THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK THIS PACE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK S CSGL -5. Purchasing Authority of Plan B Managers (B) The League supports changing the purchasing authority of city managers in Plan B cities from $1,000 to conform to the figures in the Uniform Municipal Contracting Law. Currently the law allows Plan B city managers to make purchases under $1,000 without council approval. This provision has not been changed for many years and inflation has seriously eroded the utility of the provision. The law should be amended to increase the figure to the dollar amounts in the Uniform Municipal Contracting Law which allows purchases under $15,000 to be made relatively easily. GSGL -6. Towing of Abandoned Vehicles (B) The League supports legislation clarifying the authority of cities to impound abandoned motor vehicles. Recently, the Legislature passed Minnesota Statutes 465.75 which prohibits a private vehicle tower from removing a motor vehicle from private property unless he has the permission of the owner of the vehicle or of the owner of the property. While the intent of this statute to prohibit hawkish towing companies from improper towing practices is laudable, the ramifications of the law go too far. Cities are authorized to impound abandoned motor vehicles and Minnesota Statutes 168B.04 provides a detailed process to accomplish the removal of health hazards and eyesores. Unfortunately, the recent legislative act could be construed to prohibit cities from utilizing private towers to remove and impound abandoned or junked automobiles. Cities could be forced to use its own employees and equipment because it is not "in the business of towing." The law should be amended by adding an exclusion for private towers who act at the direction of a city following the procedures prescribed in Minnesota law. -19- GSGL -7. State Licensing of Contractors (B) The League opposes the state's takeover of trade contractor licensing. Licensing of general trade contractors and various other activities has long been a local prerogative, and the mechanism for license review, issuance, and enforcement is already in place. The primary reason that local licensing has been successful and therefore maintained at the local level is that inspection and enforcement personnel reside at the local level, know the area and activities, and are familiar with local ordinance and restrictions, thus providing better and faster enforcement. Suggestions have been made to form a statewide licensing authority and split the revenue among the licensing agency and various municipalities with the cities maintaining enforcement tasks. It is questionable under this arrangement if either the agency or municipalities would have enough funds to accomplish the respective tasks. The current proposals seem to overly complicate the existing system which is effectively regulating the contractors and may result in a reduction of small contractors who operate in only a limited number of communities. GSGL -8. State Audits and City Financial Reporting Requirements (B) The League supports continuation of the existing auditing and financial reporting requirements for cities. Minnesota has one of the most modern and rigorous systems of oversight of municipal finances in the nation. The state auditor currently reviews annual financial reports of cities. Cities over 2,500 must have annual audits and the state auditor has the authority to audit a city upon receipt of a petition. There is no need to require cities under 2,500 to follow more rigorous accounting requirements than presently exist or to have annual audits. Additionally, the state auditor should not be given the power or responsibility to audit local governments or their instrumentalities. The League supports requirements that provide copies of local audits be sent to the state auditor on a regular basis. The private sector is fully competent to conduct governmental audits and may be more economical and practical than a state agency. -20- CSGL -9. Government Training Service Funding (B) The League supports continued state financial funding for the Government Training Service. The Government Training Service (GTS) has been invaluable in maximizing training opportunities while minimizing training costs for local government officials and staff over the past ten years. Both the need and the demand for .services are greater than ever during these times of tight budgets. GTS continues to respond on behalf of all local jurisdictions in Minnesota by developing innovative, low -cost alternatives and exploring cost - effective delivery systems. The Legislature should continue state financial support for GTS. GSGL -10. Charitable Gambling Enforcement Fees (B) The League supports legislation modifying the charitable gambling statute to provide local units with a share of the annual state permit fees and a portion of the tax proceeds to reimburse local units for enforcement costs. Since the establishment of the State Charitable Gambling Control Board and liberalization of the charitable gambling permitted within various establishments, there has been.a significant increase in local enforcement needs and costs, while the main source of funding these costs, the local license fee, has been precluded by state action from being used. The 1986 legislation authorizing an investigation fee does not raise sufficient revenues to compensate cities for costs of enforcement. GSGL -11. Joint Powers Act (B) The League supports efforts to study the current Minnesota Joint Powers Act and recommends that the Legislature refrain from enacting any major changes to the act prior to completion of such a study. In conducting a review of the current act the League urges the Governor's Advisory Council on State -Local Relations or the Legislature to consider the policy behind establishing such boards and the need to encourage cooperation between governmental units. The main goal of the study should be to encourage the use and establishment of joint power boards. -21- GSGL -12. Cable Communications (B The League supports continuation of the existing Minnesota Statutes Chapter 238. Cities in Minnesota enjoy among the most modern and technically sound cable communications systems in the world due to strong partnerships and commitments among cable operators and federal, state, and local governments. These relationships are defined at the federal level by the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, at the state level by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 238, and at the local level by local cable franchise ordinances. In 1985, the Minnesota Legislature abolished the Minnesota Cable Communications Board, an appointed body of the Department of Administration which promulgated and enforced Minnesota Statutes Chapter 238 and its accompanying rules. This legislation codified some previously existing board rules into statutory form and reassigned responsibility for the enforcement of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 238 from the board to the commissioner of commerce. Minnesota Statutes Chapter 238, in its present form, is very important to local governments because it protects cities rights to enforce local standards and cable operator commitments for technical, construction, and programming performance. No changes should be made to Minnesota Statues Chapter 238 until a thorough and cooperative effort involving local and state government and cable operators, is completed. Such an effort should include analysis of present federal and state law and contemporaneous judicial and business environments. GSGL -13. Conflict of Interest/Incompatibility of Offices (B) The League supports legislation that clarifies state law as it relates to official conflict of interest and incompatible offices. City and other local government officials have expressed concern over the confusing law dealing with official conflicts of interest. The law is written in such a way that applying it to situations involving both contractual and non - contractual conflict of interest has caused numerous problems. Therefore, the League supports amendments clarifying this area of the law. -22- CSGL -14. Absentee Balloting (B) The League supports legislation to clarify absentee voting ballot requirements to assure that all ballots are available according to statutory requirements. The League supports the use of punch card voting devices for absentee balloting in health care facilities and mailed absentee ballots. Currently, the law allows the use of punch card devices for absentee balloting when a voter applies in person to the city clerk or county auditor for an absentee ballot. The League recommends that the law be expanded to include use of punch card devices for all absentee balloting, including mailed ballots and absentee balloting in health care facilities. School districts ballots are not available the 30 days in advance as required by law due to their filing dates. Filing dates should be changed in order to comply with the Minnesota election law. ' GSGL -15. Precinct Boundary Changes (B) The League supports legislation to provide a more orderly way in which to deal with redistricting after a legislative reapportionment plan is filed. .Current law requires counties to redistrict county commissioner districts within 180 days after receiving final census figures. Cities are not permitted to change precinct boundaries during a five year period ending January 1 in a year ending in two. Therefore, counties following city ward and precinct lines use old boundaries, which in many cases will need to be changed before the 1992 elections. -23- GSGL -16. Uniform Local Government Election Da (B) The League opposes the designation of a uniform local government election day. - Home rule charter cities currently have the authority through their charters to designate when they want to hold their local elections. Statutory cities may establish either an odd or even year November election date. Decisions affecting only local units of government should be made at the local level unless an overriding state interest can be demonstrated. The League believes that there is no statewide necessity to provide for a uniform local government election day. However, if the Legislature enacts a uniform local government election day, the following features must be included: 1. Home rule charter cities should retain the option of setting their own election date. 2. Municipal primary elections should continue to be optional. 3. All. direct costs of state - mandated changes and additions to present city election duties should be paid by the state. -24- GSGL -17. Campaign and Finance Disclosure (B) The League supports legislation which would simplify the election process so that it would encourage rather than discourage candidates for local office. 1. Distinctions between types of campaign committees and reporting requirements should be eliminated. 2. The League opposes any state- mandated requirement of candidates for city office to file statements of economic interest. 3. The League opposes campaign contribution limits or reporting requirements in cities less than 20,000 population. 4. To the extent permitted by the state and federal Constitutions, individuals who actively seek to influence the nomination, election, or defeat of a candidate or ballot question through the expenditure of their personal funds, or funds they solicit, should be required to make reports to the same extent as corporations, associations, or persons working together. GSGL -18. Voting Equipment (B) The League supports present law which allows a city the option of selecting which state - approved equipment it determines will. best suit its needs and opposes any state- mandated system of voting equipment. -25- GSGL -19. Election Day Registration and Administrative Improvements (B) The League supports voter registration prior to election day and encourages legislation to improve the current system of voter registration. The following steps would improve the current system: 1. Election day registration and voting should be permitted, but not mandated, to take place in adjacent rooms. 2. Require public entities to make available facilities for polling places. 3. Certain penalties for election day infractions are so severe that they constitute a barrier to effective enforcement of the law. The League recommends that the laws be reviewed and modified where necessary so that the laws can be effectively enforced. 4. The League encourages the promotion of pre - election day registration through the media and all other available means. 5. Permitting election judges to sign ballots prior to sending out absentee ballots. 6. Write -in candidates with less than five percent of the total vote cast would need not be listed on election returns. 7. Require the use of county registration systems at school district elections when held in conjunction with state or municipal elections and to follow state and municipal election laws. GSGL -20. Optional Poll Hours (C) The League opposes current law that mandates all cities, regardless of their size, to have their polls open 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. for state elections. Prior to 1983, cities under 1,000 population located outside the metropolitan area could by resolution fix the poll hours no later than 9:00 a.m. for a state general election and no later than 5:OO p.m. for a state primary. This flexibility would reduce costs to very small cities. The League also supports legislation for municipalities to set their polling hours by referendum. -26- GSGL -21. City Election Campaigns (C) The League supports extending income tax credits or deductions for contributions to city election campaigns. Candidates should be encouraged to seek broader backing from among constituents. Extending income tax credits or permitting deductions by using criteria for state deductions should be permitted for city election campaigns. GSGL -22. Primary Dates (C) If the Legislature enacts a change in the primary date, the law should provide that the filing dates for municipal and school district offices should close no less than 45 days prior to an election to provide ample time to prepare and distribute absentee ballots. 1. Filing dates for municipal and school district offices should close no less than 45 days prior to municipal or school district elections to provide ample time to prepare and distribute absentee ballots. 2. Changes in the primary dates should consider that filing dates for state and municipal elections should be as uniform as practical. -27- h I1 U league of minnesota cities Policy Title Priority LUEET -1 Wastewater Treatment A LUEET -2 Land Use, Planning, and Annexation A LUEET -3 Solid and Hazardous Waste Management B LUEET -4 Transportation B LUEET -5 Ground and Surface Water Management B LUEET -6 Regulation of Pesticides and Other Chemicals B LUEET -7 Eminent Domain Law C LUEET -8 Energy Conservation and Production C 1 88 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 (61 2) 227 -5600 -29- LUEET -1. Wastewater Treatment. (A) The League supports increased state and federal assistance, and alternative programs, which provide financing for wastewater treatment construction projects. Clean water is vitally important to the citizens of this country and particularly to residents and visitors of Minnesota. Minnesota's cities remain committed to improving water quality. Unfortunately, the costs involved in providing cleaner water are staggering. Because of the incredible cost, it must be recognized that it is economically impractical to immediately eliminate wastewater pollution. Therefore, all levels of government must take a reasonably balanced approach to solving the wastewater pollution problem. The ability of cities to comply with any clean water program must be recognized as contingent upon the availability of adequate funds for treatment facilities. Since 1978, federal funding for the wastewater treatment construction grant program has been cut in half. Additionally, the federal share of construction grants dropped from 75 to 55 percent in fiscal year 1985. The same budget constraints facing the federal government exist at the state and local level but to a greater degree due to a limited income base. It is unfair to those city residents who in the past have contributed their federal tax dollars to projects in other locations to be faced with a tripling of the local share for a project in their area. For this reason, if the federal government does not return the federal share for rehabilitation, repair, upgrading, and new construction of treatment facilities to 75 percent, the state should be the level of government to bear the increased burden. Alternatives to grant programs, such as revolving loan funds are acceptable financing alternatives to the extent that grant programs are not sufficiently funded and the loan program is supplementary to, and not a replacement for, grant programs. Any loan program should take into consideration varying local financial capabilities. The League commends the Legislature for the enactment in 1984 of a separate state grants program and 1985 legislation which increased overall state financing assistance in certain circumstances. Increased revenues are needed for this program and the League opposes any reduction in the amount of the cigarette tax dedicated to wastewater treatment funding. The Legislature should increase state - provided financing assistance through a general fund appropriation, state bond proceeds, or other appropriate sources. The League recommends that the Legislature establish an expanded reimbursable grant program using up to one -half of the funds currently appropriated to wastewater treatment. This program, to be offered to communities on a totally voluntary basis, should seek to encourage immediate construction with minimal prior review by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and provide reimbursement to communities on the basis of proven performance in reducing pollutants in wastewater effluent. The program should be structured to the extent practical to avoid discouraging privatization and innovative treatment methods. -30- LUEET -1. Wastewater Treatment (cont'd) (A) The League supports a full review by the Legislature of proposed water quality permit fees and opposes the imposition of these fees on local units of government to the extent that they only serve as an alternative means for the state to raise revenue. If fees are determined to be properly imposed on governmental units, the fees should be based solely on the cost of actually providing governmental services to the political subdivision and private sector alternatives should be made available to ensure minimal costs to local taxpayers. The League, however, does not oppose financing mechanisms which seek to equalize past grants with present or future grant programs. It is inequitable and the League opposes efforts by either the state or federal governments to institute enforcement actions or impose increased fees or charges against communities for failure to meet effluent standards while at the same time assigning these communities a low priority on the needs list for state and federal funding. -31- LUEET -2. Land Use, Planning, and Annexation. (A) The League supports a recodificatiou of the existing planning enabling statutes to the extent that the proposals do not restrict local governments' current flexibility to address either procedural or substantive unique circumstances. In conducting a review of any proposal affecting land use, planning, development, or annexation; the League urges the Governor's Council on State Local Relations or the Legislature to consider that public policies which encourage substantial development in non -urban areas and which extend public services beyond existing jurisdictions and service areas are wasteful and counter - productive. Additionally, it should be accepted by all that prime agricultural land is a major natural and economic resource and any state land use strategy must include as a major objective the preservation of prime agricultural land. Particular attention should given to the problem of development and the delivery of governmental services to urbanizing fringe areas. Recommendations and proposals for statutory change should be presented to the 1987 Legislature. Pending these recommendations, the League urges the Legislature to refrain from amending the state's planning and annexation statutes in any way in the 1987 session. State law should continue to encourage the preservation of prime agricultural land and discourage the development of such land outside designated growth areas to be served by a city. The state should also encourage local governments to adopt agricultural preservation policies and ordinances. It must also be considered that, even if these steps are taken, a great deal of development will still occur in the fringe areas surrounding cities. The League recommends as a long -term goal that state statutes regulating annexation be changed to make it easier for cities to annex this developed or developing land, in order to insure the integrity of our governmental systems. It is unfair to city residents to have individuals avoid paying their fair share for municipal services provided by the city government by living in the fringe area around a city. -32- LUEET -3. Solid and Hazardous Waste Management (B) The League supports state programs designed to minimize or eliminate the need to landfill solid and hazardous waste. The problem of regulating, controlling, and disposing of solid and hazardous waste will be one of the major environmental issues of the next decade, both nationally and locally. Major state legislation addressing this issue has been enacted annually since 1980. These acts responded to the concerns and issues raised by the League and local government and we commend the Legislature for its actions. The existing waste management and control system fur the handling and disposal of hazardous materials centralizes responsibility at the state level but requires the cooperation and support of all levels of government. The system established for solid waste is more diffuse, relying on cities to control and regulate collection, counties to regulate or operate existing landfills, and the state to coordinate responsibilities and plan for future disposal needs. Both systems have been designed to foster and encourage abatement, recycling, and resource recovery for as much of the waste stream as possible and then to assure environmentally sound disposal for the remaining waste. The system has not been entirely implemented as yet, but it appears to be working and therefore the League does not perceive a need for major changes to existing legislation at the present time, but any future legislation that may be considered should enhance and not diminish the emphasis on these concerns: 1. Effective Planning. To the greatest extent possible, all levels and units of government and the private sector should be involved in all phases of planning and managing the solid and hazardous waste streams to assure a cost - efficient and environmentally sound solid waste and hazardous waste disposal system. 2. Alternatives to Landfills. The League strongly endorses abatement,, recycling, and resource recovery activities and programs to reduce the need for the land disposal of waste. The goal should be to reduce to the maximum extent practical the need for land disposal of unprocessed solid waste, and to totally avoid the land disposal of hazardous waste. The League would support the eventual prohibition of disposal of unprocessed solid waste in landfills as cost - efficient alternatives are developed and funding is provided to cities to implement their responsibilities in a revised solid waste management system. A tax on solid waste deposited in landfills would be supported by the League it the funds derived from the tax would be used to establish a fund to pay for post - closure costs of landfills and to finance recycling and abatement programs in the political jurisdiction where the tax is derived. In order to make local waste programs viable, a process for regulating the flow of solid waste must be available to provide a sufficient source of waste for any recovery program or facility. The League also supports the concept that producers of solid waste should pay the true and full costs of solid waste disposal and commends the Legislature for its forward looking initiatives during -33- LUEET -3. Solid and Hazardous Waste Management (cont'd) (B) the 1984 session in which a three - tiered system of fees on land- disposed solid waste was established with the intent of establishing a fee structure based on the type of waste disposed of in landfills. The Legislature should continue to fund educational efforts on the subject of solid and hazardous waste disposal., including alternatives for-the disposal of household hazardous waste. 3. Compensation and Incentives for Communities. Waste disposal facilities have many undesirable impacts on "host" communities, and compensation for all direct and indirect costs incurred by the community should be provided. Direct costs include such things as fire protection, water and sewer services, buffer zone design and amenities, and litter clean-up,-while indirect costs include such items as road maintenance, monitoring costs, end -use planning, and city administrative costs associated with the facility. The current authority for landfill host communities to impose a fee on waste deposited in the landfill should not be reduced. 4. Funding for Environmental, Personal, and Property Damages. Recent studies have indicated that most, if not all, landfills eventually cause groundwater contamination problems. It is largely undetermined at this point what the eventual impacts will be, and in contemplation of this, the League supports a surtax on solid waste going into landfills which will go into a fund dedicated to compensate people or communities injured or damaged by adverse environmental incidents caused by environmental contamination, including real or personal property damage, personal injuries, clean -up activities, and alternative water supplies. 5. Clean -up of Hazardous Substance Locations. The clean -up and decontamination of existing hazardous waste sites should continue before there is further damage to public health and environment. If a responsible party can be identified, that party should be liable for clean -up costs and personal injury damages as defined in law. If a responsible party cannot be identified, then the clean -up should be financed by*the state superfund. 6. Condemnation Awards. The League supports legislation ensuring that condemnation awards to compensate for a taking of polluted land are adjusted to accurately reflect the fair market value of the land in its polluted condition rather than its fair market value after pollutants are removed by the acquiring authority. -34- LUEET -4. Transportation (B) The League supports jurisdictional reassignment of roads based on functional classification but opposes any program for turnbacks that does not provide a corresponding source or mechanism of funding these roads. An efficient transportation system is a vital element in planning for the fiscal, economic, and social development at state, regional, and local levels. Since the agricultural and recreational economy of the state and its cities are dependent upon highway transportation, it is necessary to determine the long -range highway needs to assure the vitality of the state's economy. Furthermore, environmental concerns and the need to conserve energy require that alternate modes of transportation be utilized in meeting the diverse needs which exist in various communities and regions of the state. In order to provide a more adequate state governmental structure and funding mechanism for transportation system planning and development, the League recommends that the following changes be made: 1. Turnbacks. The State Highway Study Commission has been studying the possibility of reclassifying many roadways in the state as to appropriate use classifications and jurisdiction. The increased cost for cities to assume responsibility for general maintenance and life cycle treatment far exceeds the current financial capacities of cities. For this reason, no wholesale program of highway turnbacks should be instituted at this time. Instead, existing mechanisms for the orderly turnback of roads should be fine tuned, including increasing the level of funding in the municipal turnback account, and prohibiting unilateral revocations or turnbacks by road authorities unless a hearing is held and the road is brought up to its normal maintenance standards before the revocation is effective. Other changes needed to facilitate turnbacks include: a) State aid rules should be changed to allow counties to upgrade county state aid highways using c.s.a.h. funds prior to turnback with city concurrence and without penalty as currently imposed by the rules; b) The League supports use of a portion of the highway motor vehicle excise tax to provide an adequate source for turnback funds, and; c) The League supports allowing cities to determine if a turnback road will be designated as a state -aid road or local street and if the city chooses to designate the road as a state -aid road this designation should not affect the standard designation process so that developing cities will be able to continue to designate a percentage of new road growth as part of the state -aid system. 2. An adequate level of highway user funds should be maintained so that highway maintenance and reconstruction may be continued, and adequate funds be available for the state -aid street program. 3. The League supports the continued dedication of the sales tax on motor vehicle sales for transportation purposes, and advocates the prompt transfer of the motor vehicle excise tax into the highway user and transit assistance fund. -35- LUEET -4. Transportation (cont'd) (B) The Legislature has recently taken appropriate steps in this direction by increasing license fees and the gasoline tax to maintain this fund. Efforts should be made to eliminate any inequities in the motor vehicle license fee schedules and other vehicle taxes. The League supports legislative efforts to establish a system of direct appropriations to cities under 5,000 out of the 29 percent county share of the highway user funds at least to the extent that townships receive direct appropriations, as well as mandatory state guidelines concerning county use of these funds to ensure that all communities within a county receive an equitable share of these funds. Further, the state should establish minimum county funding participation requirements for projects. 4. The special state bonding program should be continued to provide funds for counties, towns, and cities for the replacement or repair of bridges. 5. Mass transit funding should remain a priority for the state. Funding for the existing level of operation for mass transit should be maintained at a fixed share formula for local governments. 6. The Legislature should continue the Minnesota Department of Transportation as the ride -share program coordinating agency and to provide adequate funding for its continuation. 7. The possibility and feasibility of utilizing existing railroad trackage as part of a fixed guideway and /or light rail mass transit system should be addressed. If existing railroad trackage /rights -of -way are petitioned for abandonment, these or portions thereof should be preserved by appropriate government agencies through alternate public use until rail systems once again become economically feasible or needed because of energy considerations. 8. The Legislature should restore the bikeway grants program in order to promote safety in a growing recreational activity. 9. The League opposes legislation allowing truck tractor and trailer combinations of up to 110 feet on Minnesota highways due to the public entity and infrastructure cost problems caused by these trucks, such as off tracking of rear wheels, acceleration distance needs, and time and distance required for passing. -36- LUEET -5. Ground and Surface Water Management (B) The League supports 1985 legislation establishing a framework and providing incentives for local governments to adopt programs or plans aimed at conserving Minnesota's ground and surface waters and recommends that the Legislature not substantively amend these statutes in the 1987 session. In order to safeguard the public health and the environment it is necessary to plan and manage our water resources as a valuable state resource. Many watershed districts, counties, cities, and towns have done a good job of dealing with surface and groundwater management issues and have the authority and ability to continue to do so in a cost - effective manner. These existing mechanisms should continue to be used to the greatest extent possible to address surface and groundwater management problems instead of establishing a new system or creating new organizations. Local units of government should retain the basic responsibility for surface water management as they are the level of government closest to the problem. In 1982, legislation required local governments in the metropolitan area to adopt surface water run -off controls and regulations; 1985 legislation encourages similar steps to be taken in the non - metropolitan area of the state. These statutes should be given sufficient time to work before additional programs or extensive changes to existing programs are enacted by the Legislature. The possibility of intergovernmental conflict should be studied and dispute resolution mechanisms should be reevaluated. The Legislature should provide funds to further encourage counties to undertake water planning activities, and these state funds should be made available to cities that are required to make substantial amendments to local plans and controls, or that are employed to assist the county in preparation of the comprehensive water plan. Special levies should also be made available to fund water management projects. -37- LUEET -6. Regulation of Pesticides and Other Chemicals (B) The League supports legislation requiring local consent prior to state licensing of agricultural chemical storage and distribution centers and enabling local units of government to regulate the intra -city transportation, storage, and application of pesticides and other chemicals. Under current law, the Department of Agriculture is required to regulate the use and storage of agricultural chemicals pre - empting any local regulation in this area. This pre - emption of local control has caused the granting of licenses by the state for operations which are a threat to the public health and safety of local communities. Therefore, the Department of Agriculture should be required to obtain local consent prior to the licensing of any agricultural chemical storage or distribution center. Also, if the local government unit decides to regulate agricultural chemicals, state regulation should supplement, not pre -empt such regulation. The League encourages tighter regulation of agricultural chemical run -off from aerial spraying and ground application that may affect water quality, as well as research into the long -term effects of the use of agricultural chemicals on the general population. -38- LUEET -7. Eminent Domain Law (C) The League recommends that the Legislature undertake a thorough study of the eminent domain statutes. The League believes the entire eminent domain process should be critically reviewed and streamlined. This examination should include a re- evaluation of the advisability of an alternative system of review of condemnation awards, for example a professional referee, a hearing examiner, etc. rather than a court; using a professional referee in lieu of three commissioners to establish the value of the land; the public purposes for which the law may be used, including its use to encourage economic development; the difficulty posed by the existence of pollution on the condemned property; and the legality and feasibility of collecting past property taxes on property in instances where the award is substantially in excess of the market value of the property for tax purposes. -39- LUEET -8. Energy Conservation and Production (C) The League supports legislation providing incentives for energy conservation and production in both the public and private sectors. Overall energy conservation strategies involving the public, private, commercial, and industrial sectors are being developed by cities based on the rationale that conservation efforts achieve the greatest energy savings at the lowest cost. The League believes that a city's individual energy conservation strategy can be accomplished if the Legislature permits or establishes some of the following measures: 1. Retrofit of Local Government Buildings. Local governments and school districts operate nearly 8,000 buildings in Minnesota. Possible energy savings in this sector range from 16 to 67 percent of current energy consumption by implementing operation maintenance changes and capital improvements programs. The League recommends support of the use of special levies to local governments for implementation of energy conservation measures, including building energy audits. This special levy could be designed to complement 1983 legislation authorizing 10 -year installment payment contracts for capital equipment or services intended to improve the energy efficiency of municipally owned buildings. It would also supplement the existing special - purpose capital expenditure levy law available now only to school districts. 2. District Heating. To promote statewide applications of district heating technology and to allow communities to make most efficient use of the State District Heating Bond Program, the League recommends the following: a) The Legislature should provide additional funds or the ability to special levy for conducting district heating feasibility studies at the community level; b) The Legislature should strongly encourage consideration of district heating potential in the power plant siting process. c) The Legislature should continue to allow use of the State District Heating Bond Program for renovation of existing district heating systems. d) Repayment of state bond issues would follow repayment of local obligations. 3. Low and Moderate Income Energy Assistance. Rising energy costs will continue to place a burden on the economic vitality of communities in Minnesota. The League recommends: a) continuation of the fuel assistance program for low- income households, with expanded services to train recipients in energy conservation practices and with a requirement of recipient participation in weatherization programs if the recipient is the owner; b) support for weatherization programs operated through cities, counties, and CAP agencies, and; -40- LUEET -8. Energy Conservation and Production (cont'd) (C) c) continued support for the Minnesota Housing and Finance Agency's loan and grant program for home weatherization. 4. Conservation and Renewable Energy Financing. Declining federal support for implementing conservation and renewable resource projects will place a significant burden on local government attempts to maintain vital services to their residents and promote community development. The League recommends that cities be allowed to bond and to make a special levy for energy conservation and renewable resource projects. The Legislature should also continue to encourage private sector conservation through tax credits and other incentives and should explore the possibility of expanding incentives for earth - sheltered, super - insulated, and underground development. 5. Local Regulatory Authority. Local gv vc i-_ G Ltj OLG lL llC L UCJI FUSI LIVI to assess local needs and regulate energy consumption within their communities. The League recommends giving any municipality the option to adopt and enforce an energy code that may be more stringent than the state building code for purposes of energy conservation. -41- [ICY league of minnesota cities Policy Title Priority PPS -1. Veterans' Preference A PPS -2. Minnesota Public Employment Labor Relations Act A PPS -3. PERA Benefits, Financing, and Administration B PPS -4. Local Government Pay Equity Act B PPS -5. Military Leaves B PPS -6. Time and Distance Residency Requirements B PPS -7. Unemployment Compensation B PPS -8. One Class of Beer B PPS -9. Firefighter Certification B PPS -10. Workers' Compensation C PPS -11. Modifications to the State Building Code C PPS -12. Social Investing C PPS -13. Emergency Medical Services C PPS -14. Ambulance Drivers -- Training for Drivers C 1 83 university avenue east, st. paul, riini -esota 551 01 (61 2) 227 -5600 -43- PPS -l. Veterans' Preference (A) 1. The League recommends that the Legislature amend the Veterans' Preference ^.ct to provide that a veteran must select one and only one hearing procedure rather than be able to request both a veterans' preference hearing and a grievance procedure under a collective bargaining agreement. Current statutes entitle a veteran to at least two different hearing procedures to challenge any disciplinary action. This is not only grossly inefficient but may also be unworkable since the standards for court review of the decisions of veterans' preference boards and grievance arbitrators vary significantly. The Minnesota Supreme Court in a recent decision also has indicated to the Legislature that these statutes need to be amended. The law should provide for a selection of a single hearing procedure and eliminate any requirement for salary payment pending the hearing when the veteran does not request a hearing within 10 days or when an impartial hearing body determines that the dismissal was for just cause. 2. The League supports legislation providing specific time lines to be followed by employers and employees in the veterans' preference discipline or dismissal process, so that an employee must provide notice of their intent to appeal within 14 days and the hearing process would be required to be completed no later than 90 days following a proposed disciplinary or dismissal action. Currently an employee has 60 days from the date of the employer's notice to discipline or dismiss to request a hearing and if a hearing is requested, there are no time lines for holding hearings or rendering decisions. Under this current system, a termination determination can, and has, taken more than a year, during which the employee receives full pay and benefits. The result is extremely costly to cities, particularly small cities, which often must hire replacement workers for this period. The League's proposal to provide a more expedited process would not infringe on the employee's right to a hearing, but would ensure a more efficient and cost- effective procedure. -44- . a PPS -2. Minnesota Public Employment Labor Relations Act (PELRA) (A) 1. The League recommends that legislation be enacted that gives public employers the option of either requesting arbitration within a specific time or allowing essential employees to legally strike. Cities in Minnesota are very diverse in their public employment practices. Their ability to deal with employee strikes also varies greatly. The history of bargaining in the public sector has indicated that if properly prepared for, even strikes by "essential employees" may not unduly threaten public health and safety. In contrast, the prohibition of the right to strike has forced undue reliance on arbitration, which usually has resulted in large compensation awards to essential employees. For these reasons, the League recommends that legislation be enacted that gives public employers the option of either requesting arbitration within a specific time or allowing essential employees to legally strike. 2. The League recommends that the Legislature reinstate the previous definition of employees covered by PELRA to persons employed for more than 100 days. The 1983 Legislature) reduced the period of time part -time employees must be employed before they are considered employees covered by PELRA. This has resulted in higher wages for some part -time employees but, more significantly, has resulted in cities hiring fewer part -time employees. Additionally, many employees who view their work as temporary or transitory in nature, have been asked to pay their fair share of union dues, even though they receive' no benefit from union membership. Experience with the law over the last two years has indicated general dissatisfaction with the law by every affected party except unions representing primarily full -time employees. 3. The League opposes any changes in PELRA which would permit public employees to refuse to cross the picket lines of other city employees, or would change the definition of supervisory or confidential employees. Supervisors of public employees should have their management role acknowledged and continue to have their status limited to meet and confer. In no event should supervisory or confidential employees be represented by an employee organization which represents the employees they supervise. Further limitation of the definition of supervisory personnel would mean that in all but city manager cities, no employees could be considered to be supervisory employees for purposes of PELRA. 4. The League recommends that legislation be passed requiring employees covered under a collective bargaining agreement to choose a single method by which to review disciplinary action. Employees presently have a variety of grievance procedures available to them, including civil service systems, veterans' preference, and procedures agreed to under collective bargaining. It makes little sense for an employee to -45- PPS -3. Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) -- Benefits, Financing, and Administration (B) The following principles should govern any changes the Legislature makes in Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) and the other statewide pension plans. 1. The League of Minnesota Cities opposes modification of the "high five" formula. The adoption in 1973 of the "high five year" benefit formula for PERA has provided very adequate pension benefits for career municipal employees. Further shortening of the averaging period would create windfalls for some PERA members and multiply opportunities for manipulation of service and salaries to maximize pension benefits without proportional contributions to the fund. 2. Any increases in PERA benefits should be granted only to the extent that proposed contributions and current reserves are sufficient to fully fund the increases in the opinion of one or more recognized pension actuaries who are independent of the PERA organization. Any benefit increase or contribution reductions permitted by excess reserves or excessive current contributions or combinations of the two should be of such amounts as to benefit the employer and employee equally as a percentage of overall employee salary. 3. PERA should not be authorized to create any additional health care plans for retired employees. However, direct transfer of premiums from PERA to the Minnesota Comprehensive Health Association should be authorized at the request of any PERA member from the member's own account. The present PERA retirement system in effect provides a cafeteria plan approach to retirement benefits. Those who need a spousal retirement annuity or life insurance coverage can purchase these benefits from PERA accepting actuarially reduced primary retirement benefits. Retirees who are not eligible to remain in the group health insurance plan of the local unit from which they are retiring, can always use their retirement funds to the extent they are adequate to buy health coverage through the Minnesota Comprehensive Health Association for persons that are 65 years of age and less. Persons 65 and over without automatic medicare coverage can buy that coverage at reasonable cost. 4. If any increase in benefits is enacted for PERA retirees, the resulting costs should not be paid from the PERA fund, but rather should be financed by a direct appropriation from the state general fund. 5. The LMC supports the continuation of the Minnesota post- retirement investment fund as a means of providing post- retirement increases in the pension benefits of retirees under the statewide pension funds. 6. No money or funding should be transferred directly or indirectly from PERA to less well funded plans. Since integration of pension fund administration mechanisms may lead to combining the funds, the LMC opposes any move to combine administration of the three statewide pension programs. 7. The Legislature should amend the present provision on disbursement of the two percent tax provision on automobile casualty insurance to allow expenditures by the recipient political subdivision of any excess over the employer's share of police retirement costs for any police department purpose instead of requiring payment to the PERA police and fire fund. -47- PPS -3. Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) -- Benefits, Financing, and Administration (cont'd) (B) Since the PERA police and fire fund has now essentially achieved full funding, employers' and employees' contributions should be reduced to an amount sufficient to pay normal costs. Furthermore, the employer (taxpayers) through payment of more than 50 percent of contributions to this fund is creating a surplus not needed for pension purposes. 8. Individual local police and fire relief associations, with city consent, should be allowed to merge into the PERA police and fire funds only if all active members are brought under the PERA benefit structure and if: a) savings will accrue to the city in the opinion of the state actuary as well as in the opinion of the affected municipality; and b) all actual funding liabilities as calculated by a state actuary which are transferred to or assumed by the post- retirement fund are immediately reimbursed to the fund by the transferring city; and c) all actual funding liabilities as calculated by a state actuary which are transferred to the PERA active fund shall be reimbursed to PERA at either the percentage that the PERA police and fire active member fund is funded in the year of consolidation or the percentage that fund was funded on the date of the Moorhead local fund consolidation, whichever is greater; and d) transferring employees shall draw benefits at the PERA level based upon the salary level upon which pension contributions were made. 9. A new defined contribution pension plan for municipal first responders and municipal ambulance volunteers who do not receive credit for their ambulance efforts under any other pension program should be created by legislation. This fund should be administered by PERA or another administrator on a statewide basis but with full power of the respective local governmental units to chose whether to participate, the level of contribution each year, the source of funding, and the minimum service period to vest benefits. 10. The League opposes any change in the PERA Rule of 90 or the current early- retirement reduction factor. PERA is the only statewide pension fund with members eligible for the Rule of 90 and with a one - fourth percent pension reduction per month under age 65 early- retirement reduction factor. Members have provided substantial service in reliance on these beneficial and purportedly permanent fund features. 11. If the federal government should require all newly hired police and fire personnel to participate in Social Security, current PERA contributions rates and benefits should be halved for affected new hires. 12. The League does not oppose an extension of the "Rule of 85" window to June 15, 1987 to allow teachers to finish their school year. If any extension is granted, all public employees should be treated similarly. Any extension beyond June 15, 1987, should be preceded by an audit of the program to determine the costs and benefits. �• PPS -3. Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) -- Benefits, Financing, and Administration (cont'd) (B) 13. The PERA and workers' compensation laws should be returned to their pre -1984 status and PERA disability payments should be an offset from required workers' compensation payments to disabled employees. PERA finds it burdensome or impossible to effectively offset workers' compensation disability benefits from PERA disability payments. Proposals to allow receipt and retention of both may provide greater income to disabled workers than to those continuing to work and may this increase malingering. -49- PPS -4. Local Government Pay Equity Act (B) The League supports legislation requiring arbitrators to consider and comment on the results of the employer's pay equity study, and other legislation ensuring the ability of cities to maintain the equitable compensation relationships required to be implemented by the local government pay equity act. The 1984 Legislature required all local units of government to conduct job evaluation studies and to implement those studies in order to remedy sex -based differentials in compensation. Cities have expended a great deal of staff time and money in undertaking the studies and seeking to implement those studies by the 1987 statutory deadline. The primary issue now facing cities, aside from funding the implementation, is ensuring the implemented studies can be maintained. In negotiations and settlements with most employees, the governing body is ultimately responsible for the compensation provided employees. If the governing body, through a settlement with a particular employee class, creates inequity as defined by the statute, it will be responsible for that inequity and ultimately will have to increase or freeze compensation until equity is once again achieved. This is not the case with essential employees organized under the Public Employment Labor Relations Act. These employees, to the extent that agreement with the local government can not be attained, have their compensation established through mandatory binding arbitration. The end result of the interplay between these statutes could be that the overall level of compensation for all employees, not just essential employees, will be set not by the local elected officials required to raise the revenues to pay for employees' compensation, but rather by arbitrators. The League strongly opposes any legislation which has the effect of promoting this result, strongly opposes legislation which excludes police, fire, and other essential employees from the pay equity act, and supports legislation which ensures that the local officials charged with setting property tax levels also set local government employee compensation levels. -50- i r PPS -5. Military Leaves (B) The League recommends that the statutes be amended to provide that when an employee is temporarily absent because of short -term military service that the employer pay only the difference between military pay and the public pay, rather than the full public salary. Under current law (M.S. 192.26 and 192.261) a city employee, as well as other public employees, is entitled to leave with full pay and accrual of seniority status and other benefits for all the time that employee is engaged in short -term (15 days or less) military service and at this same time receives full military pay. Cities, particularly those which must hire part -time replacement employees when others take military leave, suffer a significant financial hardship not shared by private sector employers who are not required to provide short -term paid military leaves. Public employees should only be required to pay the difference between the employees military pay and their regular wage for this 15 day period. Any longer leave period should be without pay and the accrual of seniority and other benefits should be suspended for military leaves beyond 30 days. Current law which provides for mandatory leaves and reinstatement after wars, declared emergencies, active duty training, and duty training should be changed to provide for mandatory leaves and reinstatement only after wars and declared emergencies. Employees should not be entitled to leave and be reinstated for active or inactive training duty. PPS -6. Time and Distance Residency Requirements (B) The League supports legislation allowing cities in the metropolitan area to enact reasonable area and response time restrictions if there is a demonstrated job necessity for certain employees to reside close to the city. In recent years the Legislature has limited the authority of cities and other local units of government to impose residency requirements for their employees. The Legislature has recognized, however, the need for insuring the ability of certain employees to be available to respond to emergency situations. In 1984, in the same bill which prohibited non - metropolitan cities from enacting blanket residency requirements, the Legislature specifically allowed non - metropolitan cities to enact reasonable area and response time restrictions if there were demonstrated job necessities for employees to reside close to the city. Unfortunately, a drafting error prohibited metropolitan cities from enacting these restrictions. In 1985, the Legislature acted to allow metropolitan communities to impose reasonable time and distance requirements for volunteer firefighters. The result of the 1984 and 1985 legislative actions is a situation where metropolitan communities still cannot impose reasonable time and distance requirements for their police officers, paid firefighters, or any employee with the exception of volunteer firefighters. The League recommends that the Legislature grant metropolitan cities the same authority granted non - metropolitan cities to impose reasonable time and distance requirements where the city can show a demonstrated job - related necessity. Because these requirements must pass this difficult test and directly affect the public safety of the community, these requirements should under no circumstances be considered as mandatory subjects of collective bargaining. -51- PPS -7. Unemployment Compensation (B) The League recommends that the Legislature amend the unemployment compensation law to lengthen the requalification period, to limit eligibility for temporary employment under one year in duration, and to relieve part -time employers who continue employment of an individual from any responsibility to contribute to compensation due to termination from other employment The requalification period for employees who voluntarily quit or are dismissed for cause is too low and should be substantially increased. In addition, the League believes that individuals who knowingly accept temporary employment of specific limited durations not exceeding one year and whose employment is thus ended, should be deemed to have voluntarily ended their employment and thus should be disqualified for certain benefits. The employers involved should not be saddled with unemployment compensation costs for individuals who accept and perhaps even plan for the termination of such employment. Also, students temporarily employed as interns should be ineligible for unemployment compensation since the position is primarily an educational experience which by its very nature is not expected to be of indefinite duration. Finally, the current law unfairly treats cities employing part -time police, fire, or park personnel which are required to contribute to unemployment compensation due to termination from other employment even though the part -time employment is continued. PPS -8. One Class of Beer (B) The League opposes the establishment of one class of beer and the off -sale of wine in other than liquor stores. The establishment of one class of beer in Minnesota would cause substantial problems in controlling the sale of beer in filling stations, grocery stores, drug stores, and elsewhere where 3.2 beer is presently sold. Also, 3.2 on -sale establishments would be selling strong beer in competition with on -sale liquor establishments and municipal liquor stores. -52- PPS -9. Firefighter Certification (B) The League opposes any state imposed voluntary or mandatory firefighter certification programs but supports the availability of technical and financial assistance from the state for local or regional training programs. Recent proposals to establish a state professional qualifications board charged with certifying both voluntary and full -time firefighters are unnecessary.to assure proper training of local firefighters and could too easily be changed into mandatory certifications programs. . The League supports efforts by the state to make training programs more readily available for local firefighters as well as financial assistance by the state to encourage local governments to provide additional training for firefighters. PPS-10. Workers' Compensation (C) The League supports the elimination of the presumption that heart and lung ailments of police and fire personnel arise from their employment, if the employee has been an active smoker within the two years prior to the onset of the heart or lung ailment. Existing workers' compensation statutes create a presumption that heart and lung ailments of police and fire personnel arise from employment. However, personal risk factors, such as smoking, can be more significant in some cases than job - related factors. For this reason, the League supports limiting the presumption to cases where the employee can demonstrate limited personal risk factors. i -53- PPS -11. Modifications to the State Building Code (C) The League supports the current ability of non - metropolitan cities, counties, and towns to opt -out of the inspection and enforcement responsibilities mandated by the State Building Code. PPS -12. Social Investing. (C) Without each employee's consent to other priorities, public employee pension funds should be invested solely for the purpose of maximizing investment return. Investment management responsibility for public employee pension reserves should be removed from the state Board of Investment and lodged in a politically independent board the membership of which is limited to persons qualified to manage investment portfolios for large pension programs. , PPS -13. Emergency Medical Services (C) The League supports the current statutory minimum requirements for ambulance vehicles, equipment, and attendantsl training but opposes any additional requirements unless the state provides adequate funding or funding sources. Cities as a group are the single largest provider of ambulance services in the state and form a vital part of the network of emergency services. To maintain and improve the emergency services network for all residents of the state the Legislature must provide funding for training and equipping emergency medical personnel. State grants and aids should be available to enable all cities to have access to adequate emergency medical services. Additionally, with the increasing interest in paramedic services, the Legislature should assist in providing easily accessible training on a statewide basis at minimum cost in order to meet appropriate qualifications. -54- PPS -14. Ambulance Drivers -- Training for Driver. (C) Legislation passed in 1986 authorizes a less than fully- trained ambulance attendant to serve as a driver of an ambulance as long as there!are two fully qualified attendants and the ambulance is not driven at speeds exceeding the speed limit, and lights and siren are not used. The latter two provisions are inappropriate and should be repealed. The League continues to support driver training requirements for ambulance drivers. -55- LIII RII M. ILI - 01 league of minnesota cities Policy Title Priority RS -1 Municipal Bonds A RS -2 Special Assessment Financing A RS -3 State Administrative Costs A RS -4 Property Tax Reform A RS -5 Local Government Aids B RS -6 State Funding to Cities B RS -7 Elimination of Levy Limits B RS -8 Stability of Revenues B RS -9 Sales Ratio Study C RS -10 License Fees C RS -11 Equipment Financing C RS -12 Railroad and Telephone Taxation C RS -13 Tax - Exempt Property C RS -14 Local Option Taxes C 1 63 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 (61 2) 227 -5600 -57- RS -1. Municipal Bonds (A) The League commends the Legislature for repealing interest rate limitations on bonds issued between April 1, 1986 and July 1, 1987. The League., however, continues to recommend permanent repeal of such limits to enable cities to effectively participate in a changing bond market. The traditional way of financing most local public improvements and facilities has been, and will likely continue to be, through the issuance of bonds. But the public bond market is undergoing dramatic change. Changes in federal tax law will not only restrict local authorities in their ability to issue some bonds, but for the first time will subject the interest earned on certain municipal bonds to an alternative minimum tax. As a result interest rates may have to be higher in order for the public sector to compete with private investments in the taxable bond market. Indeed, the imposition of interest rate limitations in this context could prevent bond sales. It is the League's contention that artificial ceilings on bond interest rates do not effectively hold down interest rates and may, in fact, add somewhat to the costs of bond issuance by the creation of additional legal and procedural requirements. r Interest rates in the bond market fluctuate in response to a combination of reconomic forces. Local officials must operate within the realities of such a market. Whether or not there is a statutory ceiling, local officials have every incentive to keep issuance costs as low as possible. Therefore, the League recommends that the interest limit be permanently repealed to enable local officials to effectively respond to whatever bond market changes occur as the result of market forces or federal action. -59- RS -2. Special Assessment Financing (A) The League supports legislation increasing the rate assessments may bear ,A,." financed out of the general fund as well as legislation makrng it easier to assess�tNe state for the costs of improvements. Special assessments financed by bonds in 1982, the Legislature changed the law governing the statutory interest ceiling for municipal. bonds. The revised law, which provides for a floating monthly maximum interest rate, creates a problem affecting the interest rate which a municipality may charge on special assessments. The interest rate which may be charged is determined according to the'maximum rate allowed to be paid on municipal bonds "for the month in which the resolution authorizing the special assessment is adopted." if a city sells the assessment bonds in a later month, the interest rate payable on the bonds may be greater than that allowed to be charged for the special assessment. The city is left having to absorb extra costs. The League recommends that the law be changed to ensure that a city may charge an interest rate on special assessments at least one percentage point higher than the rate payable on the bonds which finance the assessment. Special assessments financed internally by a cites Currently, M.S. 429.061, subd. 2 limits the rate of interest on assessments financed out of the general fund to eight percent. Efforts by the 1986 Legislature to change this law have resulted in confusion. Benefitted property should not receive a windfall from the general fund nor should it subsidize the general fund through its assessments. For these reasons, the League supports legislation authorizing general- fund - financed improvements to be assessed with an interest rate at least one percent greater than the maximum interest rate allowable on local obligations as determined monthly by the finance commissioner. Special assessments against state property Current law, M.S. 435.19, provides for the collection of assessments against other governmental jurisdictions. The law basically allows the governmental unit which owns the property to determine the amount to be paid, as well as when it will be paid. This is impractical since it results in interim financing by the local unit of government; the governmentally owned property should be assessed similarly to privately owned property and any lawlauthorizing the state or other governmental units to refuse to pay the assessed amount, or determine the time and amount of the payment, should be repealed. .1 RS -3. State Administrative Costs (A) The League opposes deducting state administrative costs from funds appropriated for property tax relief. All state government costs should be subject to the standard appropriation process review and be funded directly by svecific state appropriation, not by a broad deduction from proRerty tax relief programs. When state administrative costs are financed through the local government aid appropriation, funds available for property tax relief are reduced. In 1986 such state costs included $16,000 for the state demographer's office. In addition, while decisions on the necessary staffing and funding levels for state agencies are made by the appropriations committees, tax policy decisions are generally handled by the tax committees. Coordination between committees is often difficult in the final weeks of the legislative session. In a prior year, such coordination problems resulted in nullifying the absolute grandfather clause. In order to promote a cohesive and coordinated state tax policy and provide for adequate review of proposed state agency costs, it is recommended that no state agency's administrative costs be deducted from property tax relief funds. This will allow the tax committees to fully determine the level of property tax relief to be provided and retain responsibility for such provisions as the grandfather clause. -61- RS -4. Property Tax Reform (A) In enacting any major reforms of the Minnesota property tax system, including the complementary system of aids to local government, the League recommends the Legislature pursue policies which meet the following conditions: 1. The impact of the proposal should be thoroughly analyzed, not only for its impact statewide, but also for its effect on individual communities. 2. Major shifts that increase disparities in tax burdens among taxing jurisdictions should not occur. 3. All significant changes should be phased in so that cities can adequately plan for any needed adjustments. 4. Local government aid, or an equivalent program of sharing state revenue for the purpose of equalizing local property tax burdens, should remain an essential component of the property tax system. (See RS -2. Local Government Aid.) S. Property tax reform should not jeopardize existing development districts whose establishment and financing were based on continuation of the current tax structure. Any tax reform needs to recognize existing tax increment finance districts and their cash flow and obligations. Impact on enterprise zones must also be addressed. 6. Simplification and accountability are desirable goals that should be addressed within the above tenets. The League has formed a technical committee to review and respond to the details of major property tax reform proposals as they are proposed. Many significant changes in the property tax system are currently being considered. The League believes it is critical that any proposal be evaluated on the basis of its impact on individual communities. A proposal that may appear balanced on a statewide basis can have very disparate effects on individual cities. The difference in property tax burdens among taxpayers living in neighboring tax jurisdictions which provide similar services must also be kept within reasonable limits. Any significant tax burden disparities would adversely affect cities' abilities to compete on a fair basis for residents and economic development. Tax increment districts are dependent on the mill rate and assessment ratios of the current property tax system. The financial viability of those projects should not be jeopardized by state - imposed changes in the tax structure. Likewise, enterprise zone businesses have been recruited based on a commitment that they would receive a preferential classification ratio in the calculation of their property tax obligations. These development districts should be protected from any negative consequences of tax reform. The tax increment financing plan in effect at the time legislation is passed should be the basis for determining remedies. -62- RS -5. Local Government Aid (LGA) (B) The League strongly supports continuation of the local government aid (LGA) program as an essential component of the state's property tax relief system and recommends a six percent annual increase in the appropriation authorized for 1988 and 1989. Local government aid should not be sacrificed in any major reform of the state's property tax structure. Since potential reforms in the property tax system are likely to require adjustments in the local government aid formula, recommendations for specific changes in the formula must await the details of property tax reform. The League has formed a technical committee to review and respond to potential changes in the LGA formula as they are developed by the Legislature, Governor, or any other groups. Local government aid is a major source of revenue which complements cities' other significant revenue source, the property tax. As such, LGA must be distributed among cities in a way which alleviates the problems inherent with reliance on the property tax. Cities vary markedly in their ability to raise money from property taxes. There are also wide variations among cities in their citizens' needs for services and the costs of providing those services. A complementary revenue source for cities is necessary precisely because a city's ability to raise revenue from the property tax does not necessarily coincide with the cost of the services which that city must provide its citizens. Therefore, the LGA formula should reflect both the individual city's need and its local revenue raising capacity. -63- RS -6. State Funding to Cities (B) Cities are critically dependent on state funding. On average, homestead credit and local government aid account for nearly half of cities' revenues. The League commends the Legislature for rejecting last year's proposals for steep cuts in local government aid. The Legislature recognized the adverse effects which cuts in prior years have had on cities . and the difficulties they would face in attempting to absorb further cuts. In the past, state appropriations for local government aid have not kept pace with the cost of providing services. Other economic challenges facing cities include a declining tax base, cuts in federal support (particularly the elimination of general revenue sharing), costs growing faster than the general inflation rate, and the need to implement additional mandates. Property tax relief should continue to be a high priority. Policy makers must recognize that any cuts in funding for cities will likely result in higher property tax levels. For nearly two decades, the state has appropriately assumed a role in reducing property tax burdens. A longstanding commitment for such relief has been made to both the public and municipalities. The state must not renege on that promise by proposing reductions in local government aid. Tax and government financing reforms enacted during the past two decades have dramatically shifted the mechanisms for raising revenue away from local government and toward the state. Local governments have thus become heavily dependent on state - collected revenue. With passage of the 1967 Tax Reform and Relief Act, the 1971 Omnibus Tax bill (the so- called "Minnesota Miracle "), and later tax legislation, the state obligated itself to lower property tax burdens, levy increased sales and income taxes, and use the increased revenue from such taxes to assume a larger share of the costs of delivering local government services. As a trade -off for providing aid to local governments the state imposed levy limits on local governments and prohibited them from imposing new or increased sales or income taxes. Given such constraints on the taxing abilities of local government and the state's long- standing commitment to provide property tax relief, the League believes it would be wholly unfair to reduce state funding for local governments, particularly at a time when cities' costs are rising and their tax bases are shrinking. -64- RS -7. Elimination of Levy Limits (B) The League recommends that the Legislature repeal the levy limit laws in order to enhance local accountability and allow cities to plan for and respond to changing financial conditions. Certainly any proposal to make levy limits even more restrictive would severely limit cities' abilities to compensate for potential cuts in state and federal financial aid. Cities in Minnesota must comply with multiple limits on their ability to levy taxes. These limits make it difficult for many cities to adequately plan for and respond to changing conditions. Federal cutbacks, skyrocketing insurance costs, costs of comparable worth salary adjustments, and other forces often require cities to re- examine their budgets. Levy limits prevent some local officials from using property taxes as a source of revenue to provide for adequate reserves or absorb increased costs. Local elected officials are accountable to the public and should be entrusted to responsibly use their taxing authority. Cities exist in a very dynamic, changing environment. They are expected to quickly respond to changing federal policies, state mandates, court rulings, and market forces such as those currently shaking the insurance industry. Statewide limits artificially constrain the options available to elected officials and are too inflexible. - All cities are subject to a per capita limit outlined in M.S. 275.11. Certain levies are allowed outside this levy limit, but these special levies differ from those contained in other limits. Statutory cities are further constrained by a millage limit on their general purposes levy found in M.S. 412.251. Special purpose levies are allowed outside of this levy limit. Home rule cities may have levy limits in their charter. Their charter limits may be affected by M.S. 426.04 if it is less than 13 1/3 mills. Iron Range home rule cities in which more than 25 percent of the assessed value consists of iron ore have special provisions in the statute. Policy makers are most familiar with the percentage limit in M.S. 275.51. The 1983 Legislature exempted cities with fewer than 5,000 residents_ from this limitation. This was a positive step, however, cities of all sizes should be trusted to use their taxing authority. Given uncertainties in state and federal financial aids and the diverse problems.and circumstances faced by cities, uniform limits are impractical. These limits are inconsistent with the principles of local self - government and accountability and should therefore be repealed. -65- RS -8. Stability of State Revenues (B) The League urges adoption of fiscal and revenue policies that will stabilize state revenues and thereby .lead to more predictable funding levels for local governments. Inevitably, the stability of revenues flowing to local governments is dependent on the stability of revenues flowing to the state. In this regard the League supports establishment of a permanent budget reserve equal to a minimum of five percent of total state outlays. As soon as possible the reserve should be built up to a more adequate level. in excess of five percent of outlays. The reserve should be built up during years of economic prosperity and used only to protect the state budget from unexpected economic downturns, not for tax reductions or expenditure increases. Such a budget reserve is necessary given the relatively volatile tax bases on which the state currently relies (particularly the income tax and sales tax) and the potential for error in revenue and economic forecasting. In recent years the uncertainty of the state -local fiscal relationship has made short- and long -term financial planning very difficult at the local level.. During the earlier part of this decade, local jurisdictions were left with severe revenue shortfalls and cash flow problems because of the sharp and unexpected decline in state revenue. State aids to local jurisdictions were cut substantially and aid payments were delayed, often in the middle of the budget year when compensating action was nearly impossible. In addition, cities have been unable to plan their budgets with any degree of confidence given the major year -to -year changes that have occurred in the overall funding level for local government aid, in the formula used to distribute local government aid, in levy limit laws, and in state property tax relief programs. Cities need to be able to rely on predictable revenue sources that will be adequate to maintain the level of services required by their citizens. Should problems with budget shortfalls persist even after establishment of a budget reserve, the Legislature should consider.additional policy options to stabilize state revenues, including: broadening of the sales tax base to include purchases of some necessities, such as clothing and personal services. Applying the sales tax to some necessities could lead to more stable revenues since demand for such necessities is likely to continue even during times of economic adversity. * temporary suspension of indexing of the state income tax structure or temporary increases in other taxes (such as the sales tax) in the event of a sizable budget shortfall. * refraining from further income or sales tax reductions unless it is certain that budget shortfalls will not materialize. .. RS -9. Sales Ratio Study (C) The League commends the Legislature for directing the Department of Revenue to study alternative means for determining the Gales ratio-in small communities where few sales occur. The League's technical committee on property tax reform issues will monitor the progress of this study and review its findings and recommendations. Various state formulas consider property tax base valuation in distributing aid. Sales ratios are calculated for each jurisdiction by comparing actual selling prices of properties to the estimated market value assigned by the assessor. These sales ratios are used to equalize assessed values so that all local governments are treated fairly and not rewarded or punished based on their assessment practices. Sales ratios are thus important determinants of the level of state aid received by a community. Yet, in small communities, there are often few sales in a given class of property to permit an accurate determination of a sales ratio. In these cases, a county -wide average is applied. The county average, however, may be overly influenced by sales in a larger regional center and thus not accurately reflect the experience of smaller cities. RS -10. License Fees (C) The Legislature should repeal all maximum fee provisions relating to off -sale liquor, on -sale wine, bottle club, and Sunday liquor licenses and allow cities to decide locally the appropriate fee to charge for such licenses. With few exceptions, the statutes granting authority to issue licenses or permits do not specify maximum fees. Cities should have the discretion to set fees based on their own costs, needs, and standards. Case law provides ample limitations on cities' power to set license fees by requiring that revenues produced must be related to the cost of issuing the license and regulating the licensed business. It is inappropriate for the Legislature to set maximum fees for off -sale liquor, on -sale wine, bottle club, and Sunday liquor license fees. Cities have acted responsibly in setting on -sale liquor license fees. It makes no sense to grant them that power but deny them the power to set fees for off -sale liquor, on -sale wine, bottle club, and Sunday liquor licenses. There is no evidence to show that lifting the statutory cap would lead to unjustified fee increases. Some reasonable increases in off -sale license fees could be expected since the statutory maximum fee has not been increased in over 30 years. -67- RS -11. Equipment Financing (C) M.S. 412.32 should be amended so that all Minnesota cities are able to issue "five -year equipment certificates" in an amount not to exceed one percent of the city's assessed valuation in any given year. No reverse referendum provision should apply unless the city wishes to exceed the one percent limit Statutory cities in Minnesota have the power to issue certification of indebtedness, payable in not more than five years, to purchase capital equipment (M.S. 412.301). If the amount of the certificates exceeds one percent of the city's assessed valuation, a reverse referendum provision applies. In 1983, the Legislature granted similar financing powers to Minnesota's home rule charter cities (M.S. 412.32), without any reverse referendum provision. However, the total principal amount of the certificates (or "capital notes ") issued in a fiscal year is limited to no more than one -tenth of one percent of the city's assessed value that year. In many cities, this limit is prohibitively low, and effectively prevents the city from making use of the authority granted in this statute. RS -12. Railroad and Telephone Taxation (C) A new formula should be adopted for the valuation of railroad operating property for property tax purposes. In addition, if the current gross earnings tax levied on telephone companies is replaced by a property tax, such taxation should be consistent with the taxation of commercial /industrial property and, furthermore, should be assessed and collected at the local level. The existing system for - taxation of railroad operating property is not consistent with the taxation of other commercial and industrial properties. The present formula values railroad operating property at about 20 percent of the value which would be determined by a local assessor using generally accepted assessing principles. The League recommends that a new system of property taxation be established which would tax both railroads and telephone companies operating in Minnesota in a manner consistent with the taxation of the commercial and industrial properties. we RS -13. Tax - Exempt Property (C) State, county, school district, city, regional government, and other owners of tax - exempt property (except houses of worship) should be required to reimburse cities for the cost of police, fire, and street services. One of the glaring inequities in the Minnesota tax system involves local services that are provided free to tax - exempt property owned or used by the state, counties, school districts, regional government bodies, and by certain non - government organizations. It is widely acknowledged that such property benefits directly from government services such as police and fire protection and street services provided by cities. Since there is no legal basis for claiming reimbursement for the costs of such services, they are borne by the local taxpayers. Furthermore, such property is concentrated in certain cities, resulting in a heavy and disproportionate cost burden upon those cities. RS -14. Local Option Taxes (C) The League recommends that cities be given local option to raise other non - traditional revenue sources to enhance local financial flexibility. -1 im IR LUJI league of minnesota cities Policy Title FL -1. Federal Tax Policy: Impact on Cities FL -2. General Revenue Sharing FL -3. Targeted Fiscal Assistance FL -4. Federal Deficit Reduction FL -5. Low- and Moderate - Income Housing FL -6. Homelessnes FL -7. Medicare Deductions for City Employees FL -8. Mandates FL -9. Stormwater Permits FL -10. Superfund FL -11. State and Local Pipeline Safety Control I 83 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 (81 2) 227 -5800 -71- FL -1. Federal Tax Policy: Impact on Cities The League supports federal tax measures that restore greater efficiency and fairness to the federal income tax system. Cities expect serious difficulties resulting from the federal limits and restrictions on the authority of municipalities to issue traditional public purpose bonds, to provide affordable housing, and to use of tax - exempt financing to remove blight and to meet local economic development needs. Further, Minnesota cities are concerned about the repeal of the deductibility of state and local sales taxes. As the negative effects of these restrictions become evident, LMC urges Congress to re- examine and remove those provisions that hamper the ability of cities in Minnesota to raise revenues and provide for local needs. Passage of federal tax reform legislation will have profound effects on every community through changes in tax burden for city residents and businesses, and through the imposition of new mandates, and limits placed on the authority of cities to raise revenues. Ironically, the sweeping restrictions on municipal bond authority will not produce revenues to the federal treasury that had been anticipated. Transition rules in the final legislation provide exemptions for many projects that would otherwise be ineligible for tax - exempt financing. The cost of those transition rules actually offsets most of the new federal revenues anticipated as a result of bond restrictions. Yet, the impact of those limits and restrictions will seriously constrain the authority of cities to raise needed revenues to maintain infrastructure and support local economic development priorities. The repeal of the deductibility of state and local sales taxes will also increase pressure to turn to the property tax to fund more public services. Retroactive changes in cities' authority to issue tax exempt municipal bonds impose significant restrictions. Redefinition of public purpose bonds reduces the amount of use, benefit or security of the bond by a private entity, from the current 25 percent to 10 percent. Further, any portion of the bond value over $15 million that benefits a non - governmental entity must be authorized under a lowered state per capita volume cap allocation. Earnings on general obligation and revenue bonds are now subject to limits on arbitrage that may be earned and excess arbitrage earnings will have to be rebated to the federal government. The fact that small cities are expected to benefit from exclusions for cities that reasonably expect to issue less than $5 million in bonds per year is not much help when measured against numerous cost increases for new issuance and reporting requirements. . The repeal of bank deductibility and the unprecedented taxation of municipal bond interest through the alternative minimum tax will have a dramatic impact -on the marketing of municipal bonds and are likely to result in increased bond issuance costs to cities. -73- FL -1. Federal Tax Policy: Impact on Cities (cont'd) It is estimated that the restrictions and imposition of a lower per capita volume limit on private purpose bond authority will result in the loss of 84 percent of the bond authority available to cities and other units of government in Minnesota in 1986. As a result, cities will face long delays in obtaining approval of bonds for local projects. Some needed improvements may simply not be made or when authorized, the projects are likely to have increased in cost to the city. Finally, restrictions placed in the bill with respect to real estate investment make it more difficult for cities to meet local housing needs. Such changes are likely to lead to serious problems for cities as the value and financial stability of both commercial property and multi - family housing projects decline. Federal tax reforms also eliminate major tax incentives for the construction of low- and moderate - income housing (and do not seek to compensate for that loss with any increase in federal housing assistance to cities). For all these reasons, as well as for other negative effects of recent federal income tax reforms that have not yet become apparent, the League of Minnesota Cities urges Congress to make necessary changes in the federal income tax provisions to enable cities to meet local needs. -74- FL -2. General Revenue Sharing (GRS) LMC continues to support tbe,concept of direct federal assistance to local government as an essential ingredient in our intergovernmental system and urges Congress to reauthorize General Revenue Sharing at the FFY'86 level of funding. Recognition of the importance of providing basic services at the local level must be reflected in a program of direct federal assistance to cities. Continued funding is needed along with revised allocation of GRS payments to provide needed assistance to cities with most needs and -the least ability to pay for local services. FFY'87 GRS appropriations are not to be funded through reductions in other programs to aid cities. GRS provides the most efficient program of direct federal assistance--to local government, along with the flexibility that permits cities to use GRS funds for needs and priorities determined at the local level. The purposes for which General Revenue Sharing was created remain valid: Direct assistance for general purpose local government to compensate cities for the cost of federal mandates as well as to aid in the funding of local services in areas of national interest. GRS also provides revenues to assist cities in overcoming adverse effects of federal policies and national economic conditions. Those purposes have special meaning for cities where unemployment, and loss of local tax base and real estate values place an unreasonable burden on local taxpayers to fund basic public services. Reauthorization of GRS as an entitlement program is needed; making it subject to annual appropriations aggravates current uncertainty over the future of the program. If funding is not available for a multiyear entitlement, it would be preferable to extend current payments for at least FFY'87 while preparing a transition to a program that recognizes differences in local fiscal capacity and provides a national and intra -state allocation that directs the most assistance to cities with the greatest need and the least resources. -75- FL -3. Targeted Fiscal Assistance The League of Minnesota Cities supports the concept of targeted fiscal assistance to cities as proposed in S. 2037, Targeted Fiscal Assistance Act of 1986. The allocation of such federal aid must recognize differences among states and direct funding to local unitsof government with the most need and the greatest responsibility for the provision and delivery of public services. It is clear that a more precise definition and recognition of the level of basic local public services and responsibilities must be incorporated into the method of determining the distribution of funds among local units of government. The value of federal fiscal assistance to local government also depends on the reliability of funding and the ability of the program to respond to changing local economic and fiscal conditions. It is imperative that targeted fiscal assistance be enacted as an entitlement to provide continuing federal aid to those cities with the greatest need where local fiscal capacity is low. The League's support of a more targeted approach to the distribution of direct federal aid to cities is consistent with LMC support of General Revenue Sharing. In the event that Congress fails to reauthorize GRS, LMC urges support for a program of targeted federal fiscal assistance to cities. -76- FL -4. Federal Deficit Reduction The League opposes delegation by Congress of its authority to set.- federal budget priorities to any non - elected federal official who cannot be held accountable for across - the -board reductions required by the Gramm - Rudman - Hollings Deficit Reduction Act of 1986. Congress is the appropriate representative institution to determine how to reduce the federal deficit while retaining the federal -local partnership and programs to meet the needs of cities. The League strongly urges the President and Congress to work together to develop a balanced plan to raise federal revenues and restrain future expenditures to bring the federal budget into balance within the next three years. Minnesota city officials are also concerned about the use of Highway Trust Funds to balance the federal budget. Such actions break faith with the compact with highway users stating that highway user fees are to be used only for transportation purposes. They should not be used for deceptive efforts at deficit reduction. Rather, such funds must be returned to states in a timely manner with appropriate levels of spending authoirty in keeping with the revenues that accrue to the Highway Trust Fund. Action by the U.S. House of Representatives (in August 1986) to defeat efforts to restore the automatic triggering of budget cuts for cities is encouraging. Such decreases have already produced severe reductions in federal aid to cities; restoration of automatic sequestering could result in the loss of at least 6.7 percent more in federal funds for cities beginning in October 1986 (as of final snapshot of federal deficit provided on 10/6/86). Such reductions would then occur twice within a single budget year for cities and fail to take into account the impact on cities or their residents. When added to the increase in the cost of new federal mandates; restrictions on cities' authority to raise revenues under new tax reform legislation; and the record losses already incurred as a result of the sharp decreases in federal funds for cities since 1981, the triggering of a third round of automatic Gramm- Rudman budget cutbacks to cities would produce sharp decreases in every federal program for cities while protecting 90 percent of total federalexpenditures from such across - the -board reductions. Congressional budget reconciliation action taken to reduce the current federal deficit below the Gramm- Rudman target for FFY '87, while welcomed as a move that forestalls immediate additional Gramm- Rudman cuts, does nothing to resolve current federal deficit reduction policy which unreasonably targets 100 percent of federal programs to cities for severe budget reductions while protecting nearly all other federal expenditures from such across - the -board budget cutbacks. -77- FL -5. Low- and Moderate - Income Housin The League strongly supports a strengthening of the federal role in providing housing programs to.aid cities in meeting the needs of low- and moderate - income residents. Federal housing policy must include continuation of low- and moderate - income housing subsidies and funding for new construction of affordable housing as well as assurance that new federal low- income housing tax credits will be available to encourage investment in such housing projects financed with tax - exempt bonds. Expiration of federal subsidies for low- and moderate - income units, in combination with the withdrawal of federal tax preference items for investors in those properties, is likely to lead to substantial rent increases without a change in the emphasis of federal housing policy. Displacement of renters who will not be able to afford higher rents will threaten the availability of decent, affordable rental housing in many cities. The analysis of low- and moderate - income housing needs completed recently by the National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Offficials ( NAHRO) underlines the need for reform of federal housing policy to respond to the increased need for affordable housing in cities. It is estimated, according to NAHRO housing statistics, that one out of six households will require such housing subsidies within the next 15 years. Special emphasis must be placed on provision of rental assistance to individuals and families as well as on rehabilitation of single- and multi - family housing units. No single approach is sufficient to deal with the wide range of housing needs throughout the nation. Therefore, it is imperative that a combination of federal programs and assistance be supported and that the current decline in the federal role in such housing assistance be reversed. The League urges Congress to provide incentives to owners of private low - and moderate - income housing units to retain that property for such tenants rather than to sell or redevelop the site. In addition, Congress must extend Section 8 rental subsidies for another 15 -year period to provide housing for city residents who are not able to afford unsubsidized rents. The provision of federal tax reform legislation placing multi - family housing bonds under the lowered state volume limits should be reversed. The use of the new federal low- income housing tax credit should be allowed for housing rehabilitation projects and those using federal housing subsidies and loans. There is also a continuing need for federal programs to stimulate construction of new affordable housing, to increase home ownership, and to rehabilitate public housing as well as to provide for special as housing needs, such as shelters for the homeless. MEM FL -6. Homelessness The League of Minnesota Cities supports immediate action by all levels of government to address the needs of the homeless. There is a paramount need for federal assistance to provide cities with adequate support and financing for low- income housing and to respond to the need for a national response to the problems of homelessness. Responses are needed in coordination with those of community -based organizations, churches, businesses, and private foundations. Along with the National League of Cities, the League supports federal efforts in the following areas: emergency assistance, long -term support, and preventive measures. At the federal level, the League supports aid programs.to assist local homeless shelters; continuation and expansion of the Emergency Food and Shelter Program; and expansion of demonstration projects to provide for chronically mentally and physically disabled persons who are homeless. Deliberate efforts are also needed at the national level to identify and make available surplus federal property and equipment to meet the needs of emergency shelters. Over the long -term, the federal government must promote and insist on the maintenance of the supply of low- income single and family housing. Of equal importance is renewed federal support for rural housing programs to minimize the trend of homeless migration to urban centers. LMC supports NLC policy urging review of Section 504 of the federal Rehabilitation Act to put an end to discrimination against the mentally disabled. Finally, extension of SSI eligibility to three months is needed for homeless people receiving care in Medicaid facilities, along with improvement of pre - release procedures to'a'ssure that such benefits continue after discharge, as needed. -79- FL -7. Medicare Deductions for City Employees The League urges Congress to maintain its commitment to a transitional period for the imposition of Medicare coverage on state and local employees Proposed action to extend such coverage to all public employees in FFY'87, including election judges, violates understandings that such requirements would be phased -in over time. Congress extended the requirement for Medicare coverage to all newly hired state and local employees, including city election judges, as of April 1, 1986, as part of the FFY'86 budget reconcilliation process. Expanding mandatory participation in Medicare for remaining city (and other state and local) employees amounts to levying a new payroll tax. When coupled with deep cuts already made in federal funds to cities for FFY'87, such extended coverage requirements would have an immediate and serious fiscal impact on cities. Application of such a comprehensive mandate has presented cities with unexpected difficulties. Responsibilities for the conduct of elections, for example, is likely to become not only more expensive but also more difficult to recruit and retain elections judges who will be required to have Medicare deductions made from their modest level of payment for an essential local government function. Anticipated federal income tax cuts to middle - income employees would be largely wiped out by such requirements. The proposal would more than offset the tax cut anticipated by the four to five million people not currently participating in Medicare. It is estimated that the '87 cost nationally to state and local government will be $395 million, with an additional $395 million in tax increases for employees. In Minnesota, based on 1985 payroll figures, projected total city payroll cost increases would be at least $14 million next year. .1 w a FL -8. Mandates The League supports reimbursement of cities for additional costs imposed by future federal mandates and urges congressional approval of the Intergovernmental Regulatory Relief Act (S. 2387). The bill would provide payments to states and cities for any additional direct costs imposed by federal regulations adopted after enactment of the legislation. Mandates have increasingly become a serious source of conflict between the local and federal levels of government. As the federal role in domestic programs has declined and assistance to cities has been reduced, the cost of such federal requirements has been more difficult to afford at the local level. Often such requirements do not reasonably respond to limited tax base and local needs. In addition, congressional efforts to reduce the federal deficit have passed on new costs to local government including expansion of Medicare coverage requirements for employees and accelerated payment of social security deductions. Tax reform provisions will also add to costs of issuing municipal bonds. S. 2387 requires both the executive and legislative branches of the federal government to become more aware of the costs to local government of implementing such regulations. The legislation also requires the federal government to direct its attention to ways in which such costs can be reduced. The concept of regulatory relief is welcome aid to dealing with the growth in the number and cost of federal mandates that often overlook local priorities and fiscal capacity. WIN FL -9. Stormwater Permits LMC supports the establishment of national pollution discharge standards and federal funding to achieve those levels. Such federal aid is to be separate from and should not reduce current federal grants to cities for construction of wastewater treatment facilities. Primary focus of national pollution discharge standards should be on industrial run -off and areas determined to be causing significant pollution problems in association with such activity. The League also recognizes the seriousness of agricultural sources of such pollution and urges that guidelines be developed to encourage states and cities to undertake action to restrict discharges that exceed national or state pollution standards. The League supports congressional action to modify proposed EPA regulations to require direct consultation with state and local officials in the development of EPA stormwater management policy for state and local government and the involvement of local officials in the development of the state stormwater management plan. Such guidelines would take into consideration geographic variables, costs and benefits and seek to address the most serious pollution discharge problems. Elimination of proposed requirements for cities to obtain permits for every stormwater outfall is essential in the design of an abatement program directed at the most serious stormwater management problems. Cities must not be forced to undertake testing and regulation of stormwater run -off from countless locations. It would be impossible for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to enforce such permit requirements for all locations. I- V' 1 � FL -10. Superfund The League of Minnesota Cities supports the strengthening and improvement of the federal-hazardous waste clean -up policy and urges Congress to reauthorize the program for FFY'87 -90. The League continues to support the need for a broad -based tax to be imposed on generators, users, and manufacturers of hazardous materials as well as on other industrial sources of such materials. Such revenues are critically needed to accomplish hazardous waste site clean -up activities. Concern for needed funding makes it imperative that reliable and stable sources of revenue be provided to assure that the EPA - mandated schedule of clean -up is achieved. Congressional action to improve the level of funding and the federal sharing of clean -up costs for abandoned hazardous waste sites is encouraging to cities. Extension of the 90 percent federal cost share for operation and maintenance of clean -up sites to include treatment and measures required to restore quality of ground and surface water is a major improvement over current provisions. The inclusion of a more realistic timeline of up to 10 years for such activities strengthens the role of the federal government in restoring the local environment. The right of cities to sue for damages to natural resources and to undertake clean -up activities in advance of approval of plans by the state pollution control agency is responsive to cities' concerns for prompt action and the need to protect local residents. The authority of cities to seek recovery of clean -up costs of previously contaminated property acquired by the city is an essential protection for innocent third parties. New provisions that mandate a schedule of clean -up activities and establishment of funding for sites operated by the Department of Defense is important recognition of the responsibility of the federal government to remove threats to local residents caused by military production or activities within the city. am FL -11. State and Local Pipeline Safety Control WHEREAS, the recent rupture-and explosion of a gasoline pipeline in Mounds View, Minnesota, has demonstrated the potentially hazardous conditions of underground pipeline transport of volatile petroleum products through the residential, commercial, and industrial areas of the nation's cities; and WHEREAS, there are nearly 2 million miles of liquid and natural gas pipelines throughout the nation which receive inadequate federal monitoring or inspection and; WHEREAS, current federal law appears to pre -empt state and local authority to regulate the operation, monitoring, transport, and safety of such pipelines; and WHEREAS, federal legislation has been introduced to establish a community right -to -know policy with respect to substances transported through such pipelines and to require the use of monitoring and valve techniques for both new and old pipelines to detect leakage and assure automatic shutdown in the case of such incidents; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the National League of Cities should strongly support HR 5401, to amend the Liquid Pipeline Safety Act of 1979 and the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968 to require more stringent testing procedures; increased community notification; installation of automatic shut -off valves on all pipelines; and prohibiting construction of new pipelines within 150 feet of residential, hospital, nursing home, school, or correctional facilities or other permanently inhabited facility. one Board of Directors President Robert D. Thistle Coon Rapids association of Vice President metropolitan Neil W. Peterson Bloomington municipalities Past President October 16 1986 James A. Scheibel St. Paul Directors TO: AMM Member City Officials Mentor Addicks, Jr. FROM: Robert Thistle, President Minneapolis Gary Bastian RE: AMM LEGISLATIVE POLICY ADOPTION MEETING Maplewood Larry Bakken Meeting Reminder Golden Valley Date: Thursday, November 6, 1986 Robert J. Benke New Brighton Time: 5:30 P.M. (Complimentary ;.Social Hour) Mark Bernhardson )rono 6:30 P.M. (Dinner - Cost: $13.00 per person) Nancy Enright 7:30 P.M. Business Meeting Lakeville Walter Fehst Location: Fox & Hounds Restaurant Robbinsdale I -35E & Larpenteur Ave. Maplewood, Minnesota Edward Fitzpatrick Fridley DINNER RESERVATIONS TO CAROL WILLIAMS (227 -5600) BY MONDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 1986 ARE A MUST FOR THOSE PLANNING TO Kevin Frazell HAVE DINNER! Mendota Heights Carol Johnson POLICY ERATA Minneapolis The proposed policy recommendations from the committees were Woodbury ina dour mailed prior to AMM Board approval pproval to allow for more time for individual review. Subsequent to that mailing, the Board of Gerald Marshall Directors has met and modified and approved the policies as Brooklyn Park required by the AMM By -Laws. Please make the corrections, Eldon Reinke insertions and deletions to the policies as indicated on the Shakopee attached erata sheets since the policies as modified by the Board will be the version to be considered on November 6th. William Saed As always, member officials may move to delete, amend or add Inver Grove Heights policy from the floor. Leslie C. Turner Edina Maureen Warren St. Paul Executive Director Vern Peterson DISTRIBUTION NOTE: This reminder notice has been mailed to Mayors, Designated Delegates and Managers /Administrators. Copies of the erata sheets have been mailed to Managers or Administrators only. Please distribute to Mayors and Councilmembers. 183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227 -5600 TO: AMM Member City Officials Mayors /Councilmembers /Managers /Administrators FROM: Bert Thistle, President Re: Proposed 1987 -88 Legislative Policy Background: The five standing AMM Policy Committees have basically completed their work and copies of the proposed policies developed by the committees are enclosed. The policies are organized by sections to represent the work of the respective committees: Section I. Municipal Revenue - Walt Fehst, Chairperson Section II. General Legislation - Gary Bastian, Chairperson Section III. Housing - Leslie Turner, Chairperson Section IV. Metropolitan Agencies - Kevin Frazell, Chairperson Section V. Transportation - Bob Benke, Chairperson Policy Review and Approval: In order to give member officials the maximum amount of time to review the proposed AMM policy, this packet has been mailed prior to Board of Directors review and action which will occur on October 9. All amendments, deletions, and additions made by the Board of Directors will be communicated through a separate mailing to all member city officials immediately following that meeting. The full membership will meet November 6, 1986 to consider final action on the policy as recommended by the Board of Directors. Special Circumstances There are a few special items of which you should be aware. Policy IV -I developed by the Metropolitan Agencies Committee and Policy V -P developed by the Transportation Committee deal with the same basic subject but the policies are in conflict and will need special attention Policy I -G dealing with Fiscal Disparities has not received final appoval from the Revenue Committee and is subject to change. Policy IV -0 dealing with Solid Waste Management has been significantly changed from current policy. The thrust of this policy is that cities' remaining responsibility for Solid Waste would be transferred to the Counties. The Board will make a determination and recommendation on these issues. lI- . f � INDEX PART ONE MUNICIPAL REVENUES AND TAXATION I. MUNICIPAL REVENUES A. LEVY LIMITS 1. Repeal 2. Index B. LEVY LIMIT MODIFICATIONS 1. Realistic Levy Base 2. Reverse Referendum 3. Mandated State and Federal Programs 4. Comparable Worth Base Adjustment 5. Special Levcies and Base Adjustments C. LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID 1. Funding 2. Administrative Costs D. PROPERTY TAX 1. Tax Exempt Property 2. Railroad Property Taxation 3. Property Tax Reform H E. SALES RATIO STUDIES AND USE F. GENERAL FISCAL IMPACT POLICIES 1. Tax Increment Financing 2. Fiscal Notes Continuation -i- PAGE NUMBER 1 - 12 1 1 1 2 - 4 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 - 7 5 5 6 6 - 7 7 7 - 9 7 - 8 8 -ii- 3. Telephone Tax For 911 g 4. Funding Shifts 8 - 9 G. FISCAL DISPARITIES 9 - 12 . T 1. Tax Base Sharing Program 9 2. Oppose Drastic Change 9 - 10 3. Formula Modifications 10 - 11 4. Total Distribution 11 5. Administration 11 - 12 PART TWO GENERAL LEGISLATION II. GENERAL LEGISLATION 13 - 22 A. LABOR RELATIONS ISSUES (PELRA) 13 - 14 1. Disciplinary Action 13 2. Impasse Resolution 13 - 14 3. Picket Lines 14 4. Unfair Labor Practice Charges 14 5. Meet and Confer 14 6. Labor - Management Relations 14 B. TORT LIABILITY 14 - 15 C. DATA PRIVACY AND OPEN MEETING 15 - 16 D. POLICE AND FIRE PENSION PROVISIONS 16 1. Portability 16 2. Contribution Amount 16 E. GENERAL TRADE CONTRACTOR LICENSING 16 - 17 F. EMPLOYEE DISABILITY - LOCAL FUNDS 17 -ii- t► 4,N, G. YOUTH SERVICE BUREAUS 17 - 18 H WINE IN GROCERY STORES 18 I. ONE CLASS OF BEER t_ -. 18 J. ZONING ORDINANCE INITIATIVES 18 - 19 K. PLUMBING INSPECTIONS 19 L. POLICE OFFICER STANDARDS 19 M. LAND SALES BY COMPETITIVE BID 20 N. CHARITABLE GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT FEES 20 0. TORRENS PROPERTY DEREGISTRATION 20 P. SHADE TREE DISEASE CONTROL 10 - 21 1. Program Continuation 21 2. Grant Funding 21 Q. TREE REMOVAL AND TREATMENT LICENSING 21 - 22 1. Ordinance Control 21 2. Local Licensing 21 - 22 3. Revocation 22 PART THREE HOUSING IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA III. HOUSING 23 - 27 HOUSING PROBLEM INTRODUCTION 23 - 24 A. EXAMINE LOCAL REQUIREMENTS 24 B. PRACTICES WHICH INCREASE HOUSING COSTS 24 C. MANDATORY STANDARDS AND ALTERNATIVE HOUSING 24 - 25 D. FINANCING STATE AND REGIONAL HOUSING POLICIES 25 E. FEDERAL AND STATE HOUSING FUNDING 25 -iii- F. AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR LOCAL 25 - 26 HOUSING PROGRAMS G. RENTAL HOUISING IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA 26 - 27 H. ASSESSMENT RATES FOR RENTAL HOUSING �7 PART FOUR METROPOLITAN AREA ISSUES AND CONCERNS IV. METROPOLITAN AREA ISSUES 28 - 41 PHILOSOPHY INTRODUCTION 28 A. PURPOSE OF METROPOLITAN AGENCIES 28 B. CRITERIA FOR EXTENSION OF POWERS 28 - 29 C. STRUCTURES, PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION AND 29 - 31 FUNDING OF SERVICES AND PROGRAMS 1. Policy Planning - Implementation 29 - 30 2. Structure and Relationships 30 3. Funding for Regional Services 30 4. Regional Tax Rates and User Fees 30 - 31 D. METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE ACCOUNTABILITY 31 E. GREEN ACRES - MUSA LINE 31 F. REVIEW OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS 31 - 32 1. Guidelines for State Process 32 2. Regional Review Agency 32 3. Notification Requirements 32 G. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS 32 - 33 H. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING - LOCAL AND REGIONAL 33 INTERACTION -iv- I. METROPOLITAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND 33 - 44 J. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL BUDGET 34 - 35 1. Budget Detail and Specificity 34 2. Post Hearing Budget Increases 34 3. Reliance on Property Taxes 35 K. UNIFORM RATE STRUCTURE FOR THE MWCC 35 L. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE FUNDING 35 - 36 1. Operation and Mintenance 35 - 36 2. Funding Impacts of Regional Parks on 36 Host Communities M. SURFACE WATER 36 - 37 N. HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT 37 - 38 1. Effective Planning 37 2. Abatement - Reduction - Resource Recovery 37 3. Handling, Storage, Disposal 37 4. Private Ownership 37 5. Compensation - Incentives for Host 38 Communities 6. Existing Site Clean -Up and Liability 38 0. SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT 38 - 40 1. Consolidation of Responsibilities 38 2. Alternatives to Landfills 38 - 39 3. -. Disposal Deadlines 39 4. Compenstaion - Incentives for Host 39 Communities -v- 5. Funding for, Environmental,.Personal and 39 - 40 Property Damages 6. County Responsibilities 40 7. Transfer Station Rules and Regulations 40 P. COMBINED SEWERS - SEPARATION 40 - 41 PART FIVE TRANSPORTATION V. TRANSPORTATION 42 - 49 A. STREET AND HIGHWAY FUNDING 42 B. MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE TAX TRANSFER 42 C. HIGHWAY AND TRANSIT INTEGRATION 43 D. METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM FUNDING 43 E. TRANSIT NEEDS ASSESSMENT 43 - 44 F. HIGHWAY. JURISDICTIONAL STUDY 44 G. STATE AND COUNTY HIGHWAY TURNBACKS 44 - 45 H. 3C PLANNING PROCESS 45 - 46 I. TAXI CAB REGULATIONS 46 - 47 1. Uniform Regulations and Procedures 47 2. Central Licensing Authority 47 J. MNDOT /CITY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS 47 K. MTC MEMBERSHIP 47 L. LARGE TRUCKS 47 - 48 M. MSA FUNDS FOR OPTICOM 48 N. MTC REDUCED SERVICE AREA MILL RATE 48 0. SEAT BELT VIOLATION PENALTIES 48 - 49 P. METROPOLITAN HIGHWAY FUND 49 -vi- .r f MUNICIPAL REVENUES �1 .,t .. 4 1 1 � (� •If `,�1- 1 111• ` .f I 1 1 1 � { PAGE 1 THROUGH 12 " '` LEGISLATIVE POLICIES 1987 -1988 I MUNICIPAL REVENUE AND TAXATION I -A LEVY LIMITS A -1 5% LEVY LIMIT REPEAL The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities has consistently opposed the levy limit laws in that they apply uniform statewide restrictions to cities and. are too inflexible to accommodate inflation, uncertanties in state and federal financial aids, and the diverse problems and circumstances faced by.cities throughout the state. Such laws are inconsistent with principles of local self - government and accountability. Neither do they recognize changing local conditions as to either expenditure needs or revenue sources. Levy limits may ultimately work against the interests of local taxpayers because the law creates an incentive for cities to take maximum advantage of the opportunity to make general or special levies. For example, the arbitrary decision in 1981 to create a new levy limit base effectively penalized those cities that were successful in holding down their property tax levies in 1981. History has now provided cities with numerous lessons teaching that cities which choose to levy less than the maximum allowed in a given year risk being later tied to unrealistic or artifically low new limits for future budget years. Therefore, THE AMM REMAINS STRONGLY OPPOSED IN PRINCIPLE TO SUCH LIMITATIONS AND RECOMMENDS THAT THE MINNESOTA LEGISLATURE REPEAL LEVY LIMIT LAWS FOR CITIES. A -2 LEVY LIMIT INDEX The 1985 Legislature reversed the annual levy limit base increase index from the greater of the Implicit Price Deflator or 5% to the lessor of these. For many years cities argued that the levy base increase should not be a flat percentage but be indexed to reflect cost of doing business. This is especially true since labor costs are 60 to 65 percent of the total municipal cost, yet because of the state PELRA laws control of wages and wage increases often is determined by outside arbitration. Also, during those years, of flat percent increase, many adjustments and gimmicks were needed to keep up but since the adoption of the Implicit Price Deflator as an index, this has not been the case and property tax increases have been reasonable. THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO RESTORE THE ANNUAL LEVY BASE INCREASE TO THE IMPLICIT PRICE DEFLATOR OR 5% WHICHEVER IS GREATER. -1- I -B LEVY LIMIT MODIFICATIONS Although the AMM is strongly opposed to Levy Limitations as currently legislated, the organization is aware that there is significant legislative initiative to maintain the responsibility + for local property tax levels. However, local government must continue and be allowed to provide for services that people demand and that state and federal law require. Therefore, if repeal is not adopted, the Association supports amendments to the present levy limit law to provide further relief from current inequities. B -1 REALISTIC LEVY BASE The 1983 legislature restored the pre 1982 levy base formula of local government aids plus levy limit on which annual growth is calculated without regard to actual levy. This method provides that cities may levy less than the limit without losing the ability to regain the underlevy in future years. The legislature also provided growth based on an index rather than a flat percentage and growth increase for the greater of population or households and some base growth for commercial and industrial activity. All of these growth factors are necessary as a minimum to allow cities the ability to at least stay even with service provisions for the varying population needs. THE AMM SUPPORTS CONTINUED USE OF THE CURRENT LEVY BASE ADJUSTMENT FACTORS AS A MINIMUM FOR FUTURE LEVY YEARS IF THE LEGISLATURE FINDS IT PHILOSOPHICALLY NECESSARY TO CONTINUE LEVY LIMITS FOR CITIES OVER 5000 POPULATION. B -2 REVERSE REFERENDUM The 1981 legislature eliminated the Reverse Referendum procedure which allowed a local governing body to increase its levy base by up to 10% if it was at 98% or more of the levy limit the previous year. . The law restricted use to a one time 10% increase or up to 10% in multiple steps and public hearing procedures. The increase was subject to a referendum if a petition was presented containing signatures equal to 5% of the number of persons voting at the previous general election. If no petition was received, the increase becomes effective. This provision provided a measure of flexibility for cities and counties that needed base increases for various reasons. THE AMM REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE RE -ENACT THE REVERSE REFERENDUM PROVISION TO ADD FLEXIBILITY FOR LOCAL UNITS. -2- B -3 MANDATED STATE AND FEDERAL PROGRAMS. The cost of local government is being infl both state and federally legislated increased mandated benefits or costs for to current levy limitation restrictions, government to pay these increased costs uenced more and more by mandated programs and in -place programs. Due the ability of local tc. THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO RECOGNIZE THAT MANDATED INCREASED EXPENDITURES IN ONE PROGRAM WITHOUT A CORRESPONDING INCREASE IN FUNDING ABILITY MANDATES A DECREASED EXPENDITURE IN THE OTHER SERVICE AREAS SUCH AS PUBLIC SAFETY ETC., AND THEREFORE, WHEN SUCH INCREASES ARE MANDATED THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD PROVIDE A PERMANENT LEVY LIMIT BASE INCREASE TO OFFSET THE NEW COSTS. B -4 COMPARABLE WORTH LEVY BASE ADJUSTMENT Recent actions concerning poublic employee compensation is having a significant affect on the ability of Minnesota cities to meet the increasing salary required to maintain current staffing levels. Implementation of Comparable Worth salary studies may cause city payrolls to incrase well above the percentage allowed by the restrictive levy limitation imposed upon cities over 5000 population. Most cities budgets are 65% to 75% payroll related, therefore, labor related mandated increases above normal inflation can not be accommodated without service reductions in various sensitive public health and safety areas. THE AMM STRONGLY URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO PROVIDE LEVY BASE INCREASES TO COMPENSATE FOR MANDATED IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPARABLE WORTH STUDY RESULTS. B -5 SPECIAL LEVIES AND BASE ADJUSTMENTS The legislature has recognized that occassionally special conditions exist requiring special funding or modifcation of a cities current funding to provide ongoing required services. These special levies currently enacted should be continued. However, there are additional problems that should be considered for special status such as natural disaster funding, lawful orders, unusually large FICA adjustments and shifts of service from one unit of government to another without shifts of funds. THE LEGISLATURE IS URGED TO CONTINUE CURR BASE ADJUSTMENT PROVISIONS. FURTHER; THE LEGISLATURE TO REVIEW AREAS OF SPECIAL NEED NATURAL DISASTERS, LAWFUL ORDERS, EXCESS EXPENSIVE SERVICE SHIFTS FROM ONE ENTITY TO SPECIAL PROVISION IN THE LEVY LIMIT STATUTES -3- ENT SPECIAL LEVIES_ AND AMM ENCOURAGES THE AS THEY ARISE SUCH AS FICA INCREASES AND ANOTHER, AND TO MAKE FOR THESE ITEMS. I -C LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID C -1 LGA FUNDING Local Government Aid d been a much debated legislature and among the distribution has ra need formula based on Possibly because of th local government are ea reduced its commitment t in the early 1980's to economic recession in property taxes increased revenue to local units service increases. As occurred and state rev commitment to maintainin local services by one Lstribution from the State to cities has issue the past several years in the Carious city groups. In the past 16 years aged from a pure per capita formula to a taluation and service expenditure level. distribution debate or because aids to 3y targets, the legislature significantly the aid programs and property tax relief solve a major portion of the severe the state. Thus for a period of time, significantly to replace diminished state of government without corresponding local ;he recession ended, economic recovery :hues increased, the state renewed its a reasonable level of property taxes and again funding local government` aid programs. Although, the debate will undoubtedly continue as to the appropriate formulas for. distribution of aids because of the vast difference in cities within the state, the legislature should not abrogate its authority nor lose sight of the overall need to maintain stable and reasonable property tax levels. THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO CONTINUE ITS COMMITMENT TO ALL LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND MAINTENANCE OF REASONABLE PROPERTY TAXES BY INCREASING ITS FUNDING OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID PROGRAMS ON AS FAIR AND EQUITABLE BASIS AS POSSIBLE. THE LEGISLATURE MAY NEED TO CONSIDER ADDITIONAL NEW AND CREATIVE METHODS OF SOLVING UNIQUE LOCAL FUNDING PROBLEMS SEPARATELY FROM THE GENERALIZED FORMULAS. C -2 LGA ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS The 1985 legislature provided that a portion of the LGA fund be paid to the State Auditor and State Demographer for activities associated with local government. Although the amount of dollars involved is small, this sets a precedent that could lead to large allocations of aid funds in the future to fund normal state government operations and could affect all units of local government not just cities. THE AMM OPPOSES FUNDING STATE GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS FROM A PORTION OF AID ALLOCATIONS AND REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE TO RESTORE THE LGA FUND MONIES TAKEN FOR THE OPERATIONS OF THE STATE AUDITOR AND STATE DEMOGRAPHER DEPARTMENTS. -4- I -D PROPERTY TAX D -1 TAX EXEMPT PROPERTY One of the glaring inequities in the Minnesota tax system involves the free local services that are provided to tax exempt property owned by the state and by certain non - governmental organizations. It is widely acknowledged that such property benefits directly from governmental services such as police and fire protection and street services provided by cities and counties. However, since there is not legal basis for claiming reimbursement for the cost of such services, they are borne by the local taxpayers. Furthermore, such property is concentrated in certain cities and counties resulting in a heavy cost burden in certain parts of the state. THE ASSOCIATION BELIEVES THIS PROBLEM SHOULD BE CORRECTED BY ENACTING LEGISLATION, REQUIRING OWNERS OF TAX EXEMPT PROPERTY, EXCEPT FOR CHURCHES, HOUSES OF WORSHIP, AND PROPERTY USED SOLELY FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES BY ACADEMIES, COLLEGES, UNIVERSITIES AND SEMINARIES OF LEARNING, TO REIMBURSE CITIES AND COUNTIES FOR THE COST OF MUNICIPAL SERVICES. D -2 RAILROAD PROPERTY TAXATION The existing system for taxation of railroad operating property is not consistent with the taxation of other commercial and industrial properties. The present formula values railroad operating property at about 20% of the value which would be determined by a local assessor using generally accepted assessing principles. The AMM recommends that a new system of property taxation be established which enable railroads operating in Minnesota to be taxed consistent with the taxation of other commercial and industrial properties. This system should contain the following features: RAILROAD OPERATIONS LAND AND STRUCTURES SHOULD BE LOCALLY VALUED AND ASSESSED IN THE SAME MANNER AS OTHER COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY. 'OPERATING LAND' IS DEFINED TO MEAN ANY LAND WHICH UNDERLIES THE OPERATING STRUCTURES DEFINED BELOW AND RIGHTS -OF -WAY ADJACENT THERETO AND WHICH IS NECESSARY TO THE INTEGRAL PERFORMANCES OF RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION SERVICES. "OPERATING STRUCTURES" IS DEFINED TO MEAN ALL STRUCTURES OWNED OR USED BY A RAILROAD COMPANY IN THE PERFORMANCE OF RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION SERVICES,INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, FRANCHISES, BRIDGES, TRESTLES, TRACKS, SHOPS, DOCKS, WHARVES, BUILDINGS AND OTHER RELATED STRUCTURES. ALL OPERATING STRUCTURES EXCEPT -5- m RAILROAD BRIDGES, TRESTLES, TRACKS, DOCKS AND WHARVES, SHOULD BE TAXABLE. THE PRESENT SYSTEM FOR VALUING AND TAXING NON- OPERATING PROPERTY SHOULD NOT BE CHANGED. NO TAXING JURISDICTION SHOULD LOSE REVENUE BECAUSE OF THE CHANGE FROM THE EXISTING UNIT VALUE SYSTEM TO THE NEW LOCAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM. D -3 PROPERTY TAX REFORM Many significant changes in the property tax system are currently being considered. The AMM believes it is critical that any proposal be evaluated on the basis of its impact on individual communities. A proposal that may appear balanced on a statewide basis can have very disparate effects on individual cities. The difference in property tax burdens among taxpayers living in neighboring tax jurisdictions which provide similar services must also be kept within reasonable limits. Any significant tax burden disparities would adversely affect cities' abilities to compete on a fair basis for residents and economic development. Tax increment districts are dependent on the mill rate and assessment ratios of the current property tax system. The financial viability of those projects should not be jeopardized by state - imposed changes in the tax structure. Likewise, enterprise zone businesses have been recruited based on a commitment that they would receive a preferential classification ratio in the calculation of their property tax obligations. These development districts should be protected from any negative consequences of tax reform. The tax increment financing plan in effect at the time legislation is passed should be the basis for determining remedies. In enacting any major reforms of the Minnesota property tax system, including the complementary system of aids to local government, the AMM recommends that the Legislature pursue policies which meet the following conditions: THE IMPACT OF THE PROPOSAL SHOULD BE THOROUGHLY ANALYZED, NOT ONLY FOR ITS IMPACT STATEWIDE, BUT ALSO FOR ITS EFFECT ON INDIVIDUAL COMMUNITIES. MAJOR SHIFTS THAT INCREASE DISPARITIES IN TAX BURDENS AMONG TAXING JURISDICTIONS OR REGIONS WITHIN THE STATE SHOULD NOT OCCUR. ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES SHOULD BE PHASED IN SO THAT CITIES CAN ADEQUATELY PLAN FOR ANY NEEDED ADJUSTMENTS. LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID, OR AN EQUIVALENT PROGRAM OF SHARING STATE REVENUE FOR THE PURPOSE OF EQUALIZING LOCAL PROPERTY TAX BURDENS, SHOULD REMAIN AN ESSENTIAL COMPONENT OF THE PROPERTY TAX SYSTEM. PROPERTY TAX REFORM SHOULD NOT JEOPARDIZE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS WHOSE ESTABLISHMENT AND FINANCING WERE BASED ON CONTINUATION OF THE CURRENT TAX STRUCTURE. ANY TAX REFORM NEEDS TO RECOGNIZE EXISTING TAX INCREMENT FINANCE DISTRICTS AND THEIR CASH FLOW AND OBLIGATIONS. IMPACT ON ENTERPRISE ZONES MUST ALSO BE ADDRESSED. SIMPLIFICATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY ARE DESIRABLE GOALS THAT SHOULD BE ADDRESSED WITHIN THE ABOVE TENETS. I -E SALES RATIO STUDIES AND USE Whereas, taxing units in the seven - county metropolitan area are subject (1) to certain area -wide levies and (2) to Fiscal Disparity allocations, it is necessary to ensure tax equalization among these various tax units. In 1984 the legislature authorized the Revenue Department to study new methods of calculating sales ratios by including adjustments for financing, time, etc. AFTER THE SALES RATIO STUDIES ARE IMPROVED BY INCLUDING ALL FACTORS OF SALES THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD ENACT LEGISLATION WHICH MANDATES AT LEAST A 90% SALES RATIO FOR ALL CITIES WITHIN THE SEVEN - COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREA, THE SALES RATIO SAMPLE TO BE EITHER DONE OR AUDITED BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND REQUIRING THAT THE COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE SHALL MAKE AGGREGATE INCREASE IN THOSE CITIES BELOW 90 %. THE SALES RATIO DETERMINATION FOR THESE PURPOSES TO BE MADE ON THE BASIS OF A 12 -MONTH PERIOD SAMPLE WHICH BEGINS NO MORE THAN 18 MONTHS BEFORE THE ASSESSMENT DATE AND ENDS ON OR BEFORE THE ASSESSMENT DATE. FOR USE IN FORMULAS, THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD ADOPT THE MEDIAN RATIO INSTEAD OF AGGREGATE, SINCE IT MAY BE MORE REFLECTIVE OF LOCAL ASSESSING PRACTICE AND IS LESS SUBJECT TO WIDE VARIATIONS OF SALES, AND COUNTY WIDE SAMPLING UNLESS A STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF SALES OCCUR LOCALLY. THE AMM OBJECTS TO SALES RATIO BEING USED AS A BASIS FOR PENALTY OR BONUS OF STATE AID FUNDS. I -F GENERAL FISCAL IMPACT POLICIES F -1 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING Tax increment financing has permitted many cities in various parts of the state to define and carry out rehabilitation, development, housing, and economic development projects on their own initiative. It represents the most feasible and effective legal -7- strategy which is currently available to cities in preserving and improving the physical and economic environment in their communities. THE AMM BELIEVES THAT PRESENTLY NO SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES ARE NECESSARY AND RECOMMENDS THAT NO SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES BE MADE BY THE LEGISLATURE BEYOND FEDERAL LAW REQUIREMENTS. F -2 FISCAL NOTE CONTINUATION Many laws are passed each year by the legislature which have a substantial effect on the financial viability of cities. Some of these, such as revenue and tax measures, have an obvious and direct effect which is often calculated and reported during the hearing process. Many. others, such as worker's compensation benefit increases, mandated activities, binding arbitration and other labor related legislation, social programs, etc., have costs which are not as obvious but which will now be known due to a fiscal note requirement. Cities and others will now be able to determine the real cost of a program or suggestion and be able to use this data in determining the merits. THE STATE SHOULD CONTINUE A POLICY OF "DELIBERATE RESTRAINT" ON ITS MANDATED PROGRAMS AND UTILIZE EXTENSIVELY THE RECENTLY ADOPTED FISCAL NOTE STATUTE IDENTIFYING LOCAL GOVERNMENT COSTS ON ANY NEW MANDATED PROGRAMS. F -3 TELEPHONE TAX FOR 911 The 1985 legislature enacted a tax on all telephone service to pay the state share of capital and trunk costs for the mandated 911 Emergency Telephone Service. As part of the 911 mandate, counties and local units had to pay equipment costs, line costs, and on going operating expenses from an already overburdened and limited general property tax levy. Unlike the state, local units do not have the authority to recover these ongoing costs. Therefore, THE AMM REQUESTS THE STATE LEGISLATURE TO INCREASE THE 911 TELEPHONE TAX TO PAY THE LOCAL SHARE FOR EQUIPMENT AND CONTINUING LINE COST. F -4 FUNDING SHIFTS Currently, about 60% of the state's sales and income tax revenue comes from the Metropolitan Area and 40% from Greater Minnesota. However, only about 40% of the state aids and credits (LGA, school aid, homestead credit, county aids, etc.) are received by Metro Area taxpayers /units of government. For example, although over 60% of the persons who live in cities reside in the Metro Area, Metro Area cities receive less than 55% of the 1986 LGA. Under the current formula, this percentage will drop to 50% when the formula is fully funded. Likewise, homeowners property taxes as ho Metro Area per $1000 it is under $50. Many of the proposed the revisions of LGA property tax /state rest of the state. in the Metro Area pay almost three times the meowners elsewhere, and the taxes paid in the of assessed value is over $60 while elsewhere "property tax reform " - proposals, including and School Aid formulas, would increase this aid disparity between the Metro Area and the INSTEAD OF GREATLY INCREASING PROPERTY TAX RELIEF PROGRAMS IN AREAS OF THE STATE WHERE PROPERTY VALUES ARE DECLINING, THESE COMMUNITIES SHOULD CONTINUE TO BE GIVEN THE DEVELOPMENT TOOLS AND STATE ASSISTANCE NECESSARY TO INCREASE OR AT LEAST KEEP CONSTANT THEIR ASSESSED VALUATIONS, THUS IMPROVING THEIR OWN PROPERTY TAX BASE THROUGH LOCAL EFFORTS. I -G FISCAL DISPARITIES G -1 TAX BASE SHARING PROGRAM The basic premise for the need for a tax base sharing or tax base redistribution system in this Metropolitan Area, is that much commercial and industrial (C /I) development occurs based on location and /or availability of land or particular services. If the seven county Metropolitan Area were one political and economic unit, such as the Houston or Omaha areas, the growth of C/I development in any part would benefit the whole equally and tax base sharing would be unnecessary. However, in this area with 139 cities plus many townships and school districts that is not the case. Thus, there are many cities that because they are fully developed with no room for expansion, or they are located away from the center of activity without appropriate services, or have space but are inconvenient from major transportation facilities cannot attract C/I development. Whereas, others, more favorably located or serviced cannot keep C/I development away. This creates a situation, in general, where the tax base value per area, per household, or per capita is higher, and the taxing ability of the governmental unit greater, allowing a lower tax rate or collection of more dollars to provide service. This, also, creates a situation where two identical C/I facilities could have a large disparity in their property tax rates. THE AMM- SUPPORTS -A PROGRAM OR PROGRAMS WHICH CONSTRA -IN TAX- RATE DISPARITIES IN THE METROPOLITAN REGION WITHIN A REASONABLE RANGE WITHOUT STIFLING LOCAL INITIATIVES OR UNIQUE COMMUNITY NEEDS. G -2 OPPOSE DRASTIC CHANGE To compensate for these disparities, the 1971 legislature passed the Fiscal Disparities Act, with a rather complicated formula, whereby 40p of all C/I development and inflation growth from 1971 on is contributed to a Metropolitan Pot and redistributed based on population and fiscal capacity. After 15 years of operation, the magnitude of distribution values both in terms of net value decrease and net value increase is significant for many cities. If fiscal disparities were repealed in total with no replacement or adjustments, property taxes in many cities would increase very significantly just as they would decrease in others. BECAUSE THE MAGNITUDE OF FISCAL DISPARITY DISTRIBUTION IN TERMS OF NET VALUE INCREASE AND DECREASE TO MANY CITIES IS SIGNIFICANT, THE AMM SUGGESTS THAT NO CHANGES BE MADE THAT WOULD CAUSE DRASTIC SINGLE YEAR SHIFTS IN PROPERTY TAXES. G -3 FORMULA MODIFICATIONS The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities has spent two years of committee work studying. the fiscal disparities formula and the affects of various modificications to that formula. There are basically two major policy issues that need to be dealt with in a package to accommodate the majority of cities. The first is a fairness or equity question that deals with issues such as the 1971 Base value exemption, equalization of the contribution, minimum distribution, etc. The second policy issue is the rate of contribution. The AMM feels that 40,09 is too great especially if the base against which it is applied is expended. Each variable factor has a major impact on a certain subset of cities and thus changes must be done carefully. THE AMM MEMBERSHIP SUPPORTS MODIFICATION OF THE FISCAL DISPARITIES FORMULA THROUGH INCLUSION OF SEVERAL FACTORS AS A WHOLE. ANY CHANGES OTHER THAN THOSE REFERENCED IN AMM GENERAL FISCAL DISPARITIES POLICIES OR SPECIFIED HEREIN OR ANY DELETION OR SIGNIFICANT MODIFICATION OF A SPECIFIC FACTOR LISTED HEREIN WILL RESULT IN THE AMM OPPOSING ANY FISCAL DISPARTIY LEGISLATION UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED BY THE BOARD.OF DIRECTORS. FORMULA FACTORS: -PHASE IN 1971 BASE VALUE AT 5% PER YEAR FOR TWENTY YEARS FOR CONTRIBUTION PURPOSES. THE BASE VALUE FOR SOUTH ST. PAUL SHOULD BE THE CURRENT VALUE. -PRE 1979 TIF DISTRICT VALUE FOR EXISTING PROJECTS SHOULD BE INCLUDED FOR FISCAL DISPARITY CONTRIBUTION WHEN FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE TO RETIRE THE DEBT. ALL NEW TIF PROJECTS IN NEW OR EXISTING TIF DISTRICTS SHOULD CONTRIBUTE TO FISCAL DISPARITIES. - EXEMPT ALL VACANT LAND FROM CONTRIBUTION. -10- - CONTRIBUTION VALUES SHOULD BE EQUALIZED TO 85% BY INCREASING THE PREVIOUS YEARS RATIO BY UP TO 3% OR THE CURRENT RATIO WHICHEVER IS GREATER. -THE SALES RATIO FACTOR SHOULD BE BASED ON A SAMPLE WHICH IS STATISTICALLY SOUND TO REFLECT ACCURATELY THE REALISTIC LEVEL OF ASSESSMENT. THIS MAY INCLUDE USING A COUNTY WIDE AVERAGE IF AN APPROPRIATE NUMBER OF SALES HAS NOT OCCURRED LOCALLY. USE OF THE MEDIAN RATHER THAN AGGREGATRE RATIO SHOULD BE ADOPTED SINCE THIS MEASURE IS GENERALLY MORE REFLECTIVE OF LOCAL ASSESSING PRACTICES AND IS LESS SUBJECT TO WIDE VARIATIONS OF SALES. - REDUCE THE CONTRIBUTION RATE BY 3% PER YEAR FOR 5 YEARS UNTIL 25% HAS BEEN REACHED. ALL CONTRIBUTIONS THEREAFTER WILL BE AT THE RATE OF 25 %. -THE FISCAL CAPACITY FACTOR SHOULD BE MODIFIED TO INCLUDE MANUFACTURED HOUSING AND UTILITY VALUE. -THE POPULATION AND TIMES TWO MULTIPLIER SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE DISTRIBUTION FORMULA AS MINIMUM DISTRIBUTION FACTORS. -THE TWO DIFFERENT POPULATION YEARS USED TO CALCULATE THE PER CAPITA MARKET VALUE AND DISTRIBUTION SHOULD REMAIN AS THEY ARE CURRENTLY WITHIN THE FORMULA. G -4 TOTAL DISTRIBUTION There has been some suggestions made to utilize the fiscal disparity formula as a mechanism to create a separate transportation or development fund by only distributing 90% of the tax dollars raised. This would be a hidden property tax. THE AMM STRONGLY OPPOSES USE OF FISCAL DISPARITIES TO CREATE A METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTAITON, HIGHWAY, OR DEVELOPMENT FUND. G -5 ADMINISTRATION A central agency should be identified to provide administration for the fiscal disparities program. Currently, program responsibilities are assigned to county auditors and assessors and the Minnesota Department of Revenue. While the administrative auditor commonly is regarded as the office responsible for the program's administration, the division of responsibility and the lack of definition surrounding the administrative auditor's f_unc_tion_s__ and authorities do not c- o- nstitute centralized administration for the fiscal disparities program. Without a central program agency, it is difficult to ensure that consistency is maintained in administration of the program. THE AMM SUGGESTS THAT THE LEGISLATURE IDENTIFY A CENTRAL AGENCY - 1 1 - RESPONSIBLE FOR OVERSEEING THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE FISCAL DISPARITIES PROGRAM. -12- II GENERAL LEGISLATION II -A LABOR RELATIONS ISSUES (PELRA) In addition to coverage under the Minnesota Public Employee Labor Relations Act, public emplioyees find their employment relationship governed by a number of laws that can conflict with their collective bargaining rights negotiated under PELRA. Disciplinary actions against a public employee can be governed by the veterans preference law, the human rights act, federal discrimination laws, civil service or merit systems, laws relating to specific employee classes (i.e. city managers) or specific job protections (i.e. right to know or workers compensation laws) or by state and federal due process or implied contract provisions. A -1 DISCIPLINARY ACTION PUBLIC EMPLOYEES INCLUDING VETERANS SHOULD HAVE "ONE BITE" IN GRIEVANCE OR DISCHARGE ACTIONS. THE NEGOTIATED COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT SHOULD CONTROL THE ACTION, AS LONG AS STATE AND FEDERAL DUE PROCESS GUARANTEES ARE PRESENT. THE DISCHARGE PROCEDURES UNDER ANY LAW OR SYSTEM SHOULD BE HELD BEFORE A NEUTRAL PARTY AND SHOULD BE HANDLED WITHIN 120 DAYS OF THE DISCIPLINARY ACTION INITIATED BY THE PUBLIC EMPLOYER. COMPENSATION PAYMENTS AND ACCRUAL OF BENEFITS SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED WHERE AN EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN GIVEN NOTICE OF THE EMPLOYER'S INTENT TO DISCHARGE THE EMPLOYEE ;OR.STATUTORY PROVISION FOR "JUST CAUSE." PROBATIONARY EMPLOYEES SHOULD BE TREATED UNIFORMILY, AND PROVISIONS OF THE VETERANCE PREFERENCE LAW PROHIBITING DISMISSAL WITHOUT A HEARING DURING THE PROBATION PERIOD SHOULD BE AMENDED. THE BUREAU OF MEDIATION SERVICES SHOULD BE PERMITTED TO ENCOURAGE AN EXPEDITED GRIEVANCE ARBITRATION PROCESS. A -2 IMPASSE RESOLUTION PELRA should be amended to encourage successful negotiation of the "terms and conditions of employment ". Specifically constraints and artificial time lines on the parties ability to bargain, should be amended. ALL PUBLIC EMPLOYEES, REGARDLESS OF JOB CLASSIFICATION, SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO STRIKE. HOWEVER, A STATUTORY MECHANSIM SHOULD BE PUT IN -PLACE -THAT ALLOWS A PUBLIC EMPLOYER TO ADDRESS PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE CONCERNS IN THREATENED OR ACTUAL STRIKE SITUATIONS. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO PARTICIPATE IN MEANINGFUL MEDIATION UNTIL AN IMPASSE IS DECLARED BY THE MEDIATOR. THE -13- ARBITRARY STATUTORY IMPASSE TIMELINES SHOULD BE REPEALED. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES, AFTER IMPASSE IS DECLARED, SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO GIVE ONLY ONE NOTICE OF THEIR INTENT TO EXERCISE THEIR RIGHT TO STRIKE. IF THE NOTICE IS GIVEN AND THEY FAIL TO STRIKE DURING THE STATUTORY PERIOD, THEY WOULD LOSE THEIR RIGHT TO STRIKE A -3 PICKET LINES NO PUBLIC EMPLOYEE SHOULD BE GIVEN THE RIGHT TO REFUSE TO CROSS A PICKET LINE A -4 UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE CHARGES REVIEW OF UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE CHARGES SHOULD BE TRANSFERRED FROM DISTRICT COURT TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES CHARGED WITH ENFORCING PELRA. A -5 MEET AND CONFER The Legislature should encourage joint efforts by public employers and employees to improve the labor relations atmosphere within their respective communities and throughout the state. THE MEET AND CONFER PROVISIONS UNDER PELRA SHOULD BE AMENDED. ALL CLASSES OF EMPLOYEES, NOT JUST PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES, SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO MEET WITH THE EMPLOYER ON NON - CONTRACTURAL CONCERNS. A -6 LABOR- MANAGEMENT RELATIONS THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD PROMOTE IMPROVED COMMUNICATION AND COOPERATION BETWEEN EMPLOYERS AND EMPLOYEES BY ENACTING A STATE LABOR- MANAGEMENT PROGRAM WITHIN THE STATE BUREAU OF INFORMATION SERVICES. II -B TORT LIABILITY The Municipal Tort Liability Act was enacted to protect the public treasury while giving the citizen relief from the arbitrary, confusing, and administratively expensive prior doctrine of sovereign immunity with its inconsistent and irrational distinctions between governmental and proprietary activities. The acs has served that purpose well in the past, however, courts frequently forget or ignore the positive benefits secured to citizens damaged by public servants as a result of enactment of the comprehensive act which includes some limitations on liability -14- and some qualifications of normal tort claims procedure. The special vulnerability of far -flung government operations to debilitating tort suits continues to require the existence of a tort claims act applicable to local governments or local governments and the state. The need for some type of limitations is evidenced by recent experiences with the insurance market. Cities in Minnesota are finding it increasingly difficult to obtain insurance at an affordable rate, if at all. Amendments in 1983 to increase the dollar amounts recoverable by plaintiffs should be adequate to satisfy any reasonable claim. Further changes in limits should not be made. The area of joint and several liability does however need review. It is not in the best interest of the general taxpayer nor is it good policy to maintain a system where deep pockets, the city (public taxpayers), is held financially liable well beyond its actual fault. Finally, city elected and appointed officials are often the subject of lawsuits demanding punitive damages. It is only reasonable that if through their duty they are subjected to this risk the city should not only be responsible for defense but also for the punitive damage if one is awarded. THE AMM SUPPORTS THE CONTINUED EXISTANCE OF THE MUNICIPAL TORT LIABILITY ACT AND RECOMMENDS THAT THE CURRENT LIMITS OF LIABILITY REMAIN INTACT. THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO REVIEW THE JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY ISSUE AND MODIFY IT SO THAT CITIES AND THEIR TAXPAYERS ARE NOT UNFAIRLY SUBJECTED TO DEEP POCKET AWARDS. FINALLY, THE AMM REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE TO PROVIDE THE OPTION FOR CITIES TO PAY PUNITIVE DAMAGES AWARDED AGAINST CITY ELECTED AND APPOINTED OFFICIALS ARISING FROM ACTS PERFORMED IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY. II -C DATA PRIVACY AND OPEN MEETING Data privacy laws protect individuals from the release of information to the public which the legislature has deemed to be private or which could be unnecessarily harmful to the individual. On the other hand, the open meeting law prohibits local government units from holding closed sessions except when discussing pending or actual law suits with an attorney or labor negotiations. Unfortunately, many occasions have arisen in past years -- where_ local- units- in dealing with individuals or employee disciplinary matters have been forced to either violate the Data Privacy Statutes or the Open Meeting Statute in order to fairly resolve the issue. THE AMM REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE TO MAKE THE DATA PRIVACY AND OPEN -15- MEETING LAWS CONSISTENT SO THAT TO COMPLY WITH ONE LAW A CITY SHOULD NOT HAVE TO VIOLATE THE OTHER. FURTHER, THE AMM STRONGLY SUPPORTS LEGISLATION FAVORING DATA PRIVACY OVER OPEN MEETING WHERE CONFLICTS ARISE TO PROTECT THE EMPLOYEES RIGHT OF CONFIDENTIALITY FOR PERSONAL AND PRIVATE DATA AS IS DONE IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR AND SECURED BY FEDERAL LAW. II -D POLICE AND FIRE PENSION PROVISIONS Local police and full -time fire relief associations were phased out by the 1980 legislature, unless the local council opts to keep the relief association. All new employees will become part of the state police and fire PERA fund and the state will reimburse local units for a ortion of the unfunded liability remaining in the local fund. Employee contributions were set at 8 %. However, the Legislative Retirement Commission has in the past established a general policy requiring public safety employees to pay 40% of the normal pension costs. These changes have greatly helped solve a most serious problem but a few minor adjustments are still necessary. The AMM believes that: D -1 PORTABILITY SOME FORM OF PORTABILITY INTO THE PERA POLICE AND FIRE FUND SHOULD BE PROVIDED TO MEMBERS OF LOCAL POLICE AND FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATIONS IF THEY TAKE A PUBLIC SAFETY POSITION IN ANOTHER GOVERNMENTAL UNIT BEFORE THEIR PENSION BENEFITS ARE VESTED. THE LAW SHOULD ALSO BE AMENDED TO PERMIT A MEMBER OF THE PERA POLICE AND FIRE FUND TO CONTINUE PERA COVERAGE WHEN THE MEMBER TAKES A PUBLIC SAFETY POSITION IN A CITY WITH A LOCAL RELIEF ASSOCIATION. D -2 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION AMOUNT EVEN THOUGH THE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION AMOUNT WAS SET AT 8 %, IN MANY FUNDS THIS IS NOT EQUIVALENT TO 40% OF THE NORMAL COSTS. THE AMM URGES THAT THE CONTRIBUTION LEVEL BE SET AT 40% OF THE NORMAL COST OF FINANCING THE BENEFITS EVEN IF THIS AMOUNT EXCEEDS 8% OF BASE SALARY. ANY INCREASE IN� BENEFITS FOR CURRENT EMPLOYEES INCLUDING ANY RESULTING DEFICIT, SHOULD BE FINANCED 50% BY THE EMPLOYING CITY AND 50% BY EMPLOYEES ON A CURRENT BASIS. II -E OPPOSE STATE OR METROPOLITAN LICENSING OF GENERAL TRADE CONTRACTORS Licensing of general trade contractors and various other activities has long been a local prerogative, and the mechanism for license review, issuance, and enforcement is already in place. The primary reason that local licensing has been successful and, therefore, maintained at the local level, is that inspection and enforcement personnel reside at the local level, know the area and activities, and are familiar with local ordinance and i :E restrictions, thus providing better and faster enforcement. Suggestions have been made to form a statewide or metropolitan wide licensing authority and split the revenue among the licensing agency and various municipalities with the municipalities maintaining enforcement tasks. It is questionable under this arrangement, if either the agency or municipalities would have enough funds to accomplish the respective tasks. In these times of economic stress it does not seem logical to increase participation in an area that has and is being handled effectively at the local level. Therefore, THE AMM STRONGLY OPPOSES STATE OR METROPOLITAN TAKEOVER OF GENERAL TRADE CONTRACTOR AND OTHER ASSOCIATED TRADE CONTRACTOR LICENSING. II -F EMPLOYEE DISABILITY - LOCAL POLICE AND FIRE FUNDS A number of cities with local police and fire pension funds are experiencing a problem with employees receiving disability payments from the local fund and full worker's compensation payments totaling more in after tax take home pay than if they were working. PERA police and fire employees are prohibited by law from receiving greater pay while on disability than while working, but Minnesota Statutes 424.27 specifically prohibits cities with local plans from correcting the above situation. This quirk in the law is a costly one for cities and provides impetus for marginally disabled employees to stay home. Why work when you can make more by not working? Therefore, THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO CORRECT MINNESOTA STATUTE 424.27 TO ELIMINATE THE ABILITY OF AN EMPLOYEE IN A LOCAL POLICE OR FIRE FUND TO RECEIVE DOUBLE DISABILITY PAYMENTS WHICH EXCEED THE NORMAL AFTER TAX WORKING INCOME. FURTHER, THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD CLARIFY AND ESTABLISH STANDARDS SIMILAR TO PERA FOR DETERMINING DISABILITY. II -G YOUTH SERVICE BUREAUS Youth Service Bureaus operating within or by joint powers agreement among a small number of communities and sponsored initially through federal and state grants have proven successful in curbing increased incidence of repetitive youth offense, especially because of the ease and speed of access for local clients. However, this concept is endangered due to funding limitations caused in part by levy limit restrictions which do not allow flexibility to start new programs or allow funding when Federal Grants run out and in part through decreasing state grants. The legislature should encourage local governments to sponsor Youth Service Bureau type activities as a help and buffer to the court system and a preventative for habitual youth offense. THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD REVERSE THE PAST FEW YEARS TREND AND -17- INCREASE THE STATE GRANT PROGRAM FUNDING FOR YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU ACTIVITIES. ADDITIONALLY, FOR THE PROGRAMS TO SUCCEED, LOCAL UNITS MUST BE PROVIDED THE ABILITY TO FUND THESE PROGRAMS THROUGH THE LOCAL PROPERTY TAX LEVY BY USE OF A SPECIAL LEVY OR BASE INCREASE.', II -H WINE IN GROCERY STORE Sale of wine in grocery or fast food stores would create many problems of control for local units of government since minors have a significantly higher employment rate in these establishments. A local option on sales is also unworkable, particularly where cities share borders and are densely located. THE AMM OPPOSES PROVISION FOR THE OFF -SALE OF WINE IN OTHER THAN LIQUOR STORES. II -I ONE CLASS OF BEER Legislation has been proposed in past years to eliminate the manufacture and sale of 3.2 beer in Minnesota. If this were done substantial problems could arise in control of the sale of strong beer in service stations, grocery stores, drugstores, and elsewhere that 3.2 beer is presently sold. THE AMM OPPOSES THE ELIMINATION OF 3.2 BEER SALES IN MINNESOTA. SHOULD THE MANUFACTURE AND SALE OF 3.2 BEER BE ELIMINATED IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, THE AMM STRONGLY URGES CONTINUED LOCAL CONTROL OF LICENSING AND WOULD OPPOSE LEGISLATION MANDATING OR GRANDFATHERING LICENSING OF 3.2 BEER SALES LOCATIONS WHERE THE PRINICPAL PRODUCT IS NOT STRONG ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES. II -J OPPOSE INITIATIVE - REFERENDUM FOR ZONING ORDINANCES The Municipal Planning Act has been interpreted to allow for initiative and referendum (IR) in cities with charter provisions allowing for IR. There is eveidence that this interpretation has interferred with cities' efforts to achieve their planning and development goals, particularly in the housing field in the metropolitan area. First, the statutory procedure on zoning ordinances provides ample opportunity for the participation of both the general public and individual property owners in decisions relating to zoning ordinances or the Municipal Comprehensive Plan. It is inappropriate to allow such a long deliberative process to be overturned by a relatively few voters who may have narrow interests in the issue. Second, the clear intent of the existing planning law is that zoning ordinances and amendments not be subject to IR. Without a clear uniform statutory procedure for the implementation of municipal planning, statutory and charter cities will be subject to different procedures and the intent of the act will not be realized. Therefore, THE AMM SUPPORTS AN AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL PLANNING ACT TO PROVIDE THAT ZONING ORDINANCES AND AMENDMENTS NOT BE SUBJECT TO CITY CHARTER PROVISIONS ON INITIATIVE AND REFERENDUM. II -K PLUMBING INSPECTIONS Currently plumbing inspections are being handled as a routine part of the overall inspections done through city Building Inspection Programs. No special requirements exist other than normal certification of the Building Inspector. Electrical inspections are done by State Electrical Inspectors. In 1985 the Senate passed and the House considered a bill to require plumbing inspections be done by licensed plumbers Where this is currently done, plumbing permit costs are significantly higher. THE AMM OPPOSES MANDATING BY THE STATE THAT ALL PLUMBING INSPECTIONS BE DONE BY LICENSED PLUMBERS AS UNNECESSARY AND OVERLY EXPENSIVE. THE AMM WOULD SUPPORT DEVELOPMENT OF AN APPROPRIATE PLUMBING INSPECTION TEST AND CERTIFICATION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION FOR PLUMBERS AND /OR CURRENT BUILDING INSPECTORS IF THERE IS PROVIDED ADEQUATE TIME AND EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY FOR CURRENT INSPECTORS TO BECOME CERTIFIED. II -L POLICE OFFICER STANDARDS Since the adoption of uniform standards of training and licensing for police officers in 1978 many positive changes have been made to allow a wide range of people to qualify to be police officers in Minnesota. However, one area is still a significant problem, protected class recruitment, specifically Black and Hispanic minorities. Because of the education requirements, people must decide or be recruited early in the post secondary education time frame, to qualify in police work. - Neither POST nor cities are in the position of being able to induce or recruit people into the appropriate eductional track at the approipriate time and the University /College system is not doing so either. Therefore, protected class hiring is very difficult. THE AMM SUGGESTS THE LEGISLATURE ESTABLISH A STUDY TO DETERMINE METHODS TO ENCOURAGE RECRUITMENT AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE POST SECONDARY - - -- EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM OF PROTECTED CLASS PERSONS FOR CAREERS IN POLICE WORK. II -M LAND SALES BY COMPETITIVE BID Legislation introduced in 1985 required that any land sold by a -19- city would have to have three weeks published notice and sold at the most favorable bid to the city. All bids could be rejected. The bill did not consider development activities such as TIF, HUD, etc. or what happens if no bid is received. Nor did it consider cases where small or unbuildable parcels exist that should be handled through negotiated sales or trades with neighboring property owners. THE AMM OPPOSES IMPOSITION OF A MANDATED COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCESS FOR SALE OF LAND BY CITIES. II -N CHARITABLE GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT FEES Since the establishment of the State Gambling Board and liberalization of charitable gambling permitted within various establishments, there has been a significant increase in local enforcement needs and costs. THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO MODIFY THE CHARITABLE GAMBLING STATUTE TO PROVIDE LOCAL UNITS WITH A SHARE OF THE ANNUAL STATE TAX PROCEEDS FOR 'ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES. II -0 TORRENS PROPERTY DEREGISTRATION In all but counties containing a city of the first class deregistration of Torrens property may be done in a reasonably easy and quick manor through application and hearing in district court. After reconciling any discrepancies the court may order a certificate of title and recording with the registrar of deeds. In counties containing a city of the first class the process is somewhat differant administratively and in Ramsey county has become drawn out, between 2.5 and 3 years on the average. This is a significant problem for redevelopment where re- registration or replatting is necessary. THE AMM REQUESTS THAT THE PROCESS FOR DEREGISTRATION OF TORRENS PROPERTY IN COUNTIES CONTAINING CITIES OF THE FIRST CLASS BE STREAMLINED THRU LEGISLATION SIMILAR TO OTHER COUNTIES OR ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGE. II -P SHADE TREE DISEASE CONTROL PROGRAM Starting in 1977 the legislature made a strong commitment to control Dutch Elm and Oak Wilt tree diseases by enacting an excellent Shade Tree Disease Control program and backing that legislation with sufficient funding to bring the diseases under control. However, due to lack of financing in the most recent past, Dutch Elm disease is once again spreading rapidly as it has in other areas of the country when financial commitment has stopped. Therefore, the AMM urges the legislature to: IP&M P -1 PROGRAM CONTINUATION CONTINUE THE SHADE TREE DISEASE CONTROL LEGISLATION WITH NO CHANGES AND TO PERMIT CITIES TO USE SPECIAL LEVIES, SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS, AND OTHER SOURCES TO FUND LOCAL CONTROL PROGRAMS. P -2 GRANT FUNDING THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD ONCE AGAIN MAKE SHADE TREE DISEASE CONTROL A TOP PRIORITY ISSUE AND RE -ENACT THE GRANT PROGRAM AT A SUFFICIENT LEVEL TO ACHIEVE A 50% SANITATION AND REFORESTATION TARGET LEVEL. II -Q TREE REMOVAL AND TREATMENT LICENSING The high incidence of Dutch Elm and Oak Wilt disease has understandably caused a large increase in the activity and numbers of firms in the tree removal and treatment service business. Several proposals have been made to initiate metropolitan or statewide licensing and setting of standards. The Association does concur that some form of consumer and worker protection, as well as control of chemical treatment activities, would be advisable. However, we would oppose mandatory licensing on state or metropolitan level. Licensing of contractors and various activities has long been a local prerogative and the mechanism for license review, issuance and enforcement is already in place. The primary reason that local licensing has been successful and, therefore, maintained at the local level, is that inspection and enforcement personnel reside at the local level and are much more familiar with the area and activities thus providing better and faster enforcement. Most local units currently have a tree inspector and some form of control /removal program. It then logically follows that licensing could most economically and efficiently be initiated and enforced at this level. Q -1 ORDINANCE CONTROL THE ASSOCIATION URGES MUNICIPALITIES TO ADOPT TREE REMOVAL AND TREATMENT LICENSING PROCEDURES FOR THE PROTECTION OF PROPERTY OWNERS, THE GENERAL PUBLIC, AND EMPLOYEES OR FIRMS ENGAGED IN THAT SERVICE. TO THAT END, THE ASSOCIATION HAS DEVELOPED AND WILL MAKE AVAILABLE TO INTERESTED MUNICIPALITIES A MODEL ORDINANCE SETTING STANDARDS AND REGULATING THE ACTIVITIES OF TREE REMOVAL AND TREATMENT FIRMS. Q -2 LOCAL LICENSING THE ASSOCIATION STRONGLY SUPPORTS TREE REMOVAL AND TREATMENT LICENSING AT THE PREROGATIVE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT BUT DOES STRONGLY OPPOSE INITIATION OF MANDATORY LICENSING AND /OR LICENSING AT THE STATE OF METROPOLITAN LEVEL. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE STATE -21- STATE OF METROPOLITAN LEVEL. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE STATE ESTABLISH UNIFORM MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR SHADE TREE TREATMENT CONTRACTORS AND BUSINESSESS. Q -3 REVOCATION RECOGNIZING THAT THERE ARE EFFORTS ON THE PART OF SOME TO LEGISLATE STATE OR METROPOLITAN WIDE LICENSING, THE AMM URGES THAT IF AREA WIDE LICENSING IS CONSIDERED, THAT A PROVISION BE INCLUDED ALLOWING A LOCAL UNIT TO REVOKE THE LICENSE PROVISIONS WITHIN ITS JURISDICTION. -22- 4 4 f B III HOUSING IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA PAGE 23 THROUGH 27 III HOUSING IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA HOUSING PROBLEM DEFINITION Affordable housing is a metropolitan problem of major proportions according to data compiled by the Metropolitan Council and the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. There are strong indications that under existing conditions, the total need for housing or the need of the lower income segment will not be met. There is an equally important problem of maintaining and re -using existing housing stock effectively. The Federal and State Governments appear to be reducing their financial commitments for housing for low and moderate income persons and this will intensify the housing shortage problem for those unable to purchase or rent at market rates. Local units of government do not have the financial capability to assume the shortfall in Federal and State provided subsidies. The housing problem for persons unable to afford market rate housing can only be solved if all levels of government and the private sector work together and if each contributes a fair share to the solution. Each level of government should contribute to help solve the problem and each level's contributions should be of the kind it is best suited to make. The Federal and State Levels should continue to provide most of the direct subsidies for low and moderate income persons. The Federal and State Governments also have the responsibility to provide a tax climate in which the private sector can produce rental units that are affordable to low and moderate income households. The State should also grant local units of government the authority and flexibility to conduct the kind of housing programs that best meets their diverse needs. The Metropolitan Council should continue to place high priority on housing planning for the Metropolitan Area and provide specific guidance to the public and private sectors so that both can make rational decisions relative to future housing needs. The council should continue to be agressive in seeking inovative ways to create housing opportunities for low income persons. Local units of Government also have a strong role to play. Land use controls constitute a small portion of the total cost of housing but local units should not set requirements which go beyond what is necessary for the protection of health, safety and welfare. Local units should also work with the private sector to make the best use of existing tools (revenue bonds, tax increment financing, etc.) to produce housing which is more affordable. U Decision makers at all levels of government must become more cognizant of their actions, policies, and decisions which have -23- an indirect but substantial impact on housing costs. III -A EXAMINE LOCAL REQUIREMENTS Local requirements, if excessive, could increase the cost of producing housing and all participants in the housing delivery system need to do their part to hold costs down. COMMUNITIES SHOULD EXAMINE THEIR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS (LAND USE REGULATIONS, SUBDIVISION ORDINANCES, ETC.) TO ASSURE THAT THESE REQUIREMENTS DO NOT GO BEYOND WHAT IS NECESSARY FOR THE PROTECTION OF HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE, AND INHIBIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING. MODIFICATIONS SHOULD BE MADE WHEN APPROPRIATE. III -B PRACTICES WHICH INCREASE HOUSING COSTS Decision makers at various levels of government must become more cognizant of actions they take which have an indirect but substantial impact on housing costs. These actions in themselves may , be worthwhile and beneficial, but when implemented result in increased housing costs. Examples of this type of action would include such things as the sewer availability charge, restricted growth policies, building and energy codes, environmental rules, etc. ALL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT SHOULD EXAMINE THEIR PRACTICES AND POLICIES TO DETERMINE POSSIBLE HIDDEN IMPACTS ON HOUSING COSTS OF SAID PRACTICES AND POLICIES NOT DIRECTLY RELATED TO HOUSING. CHANGES SHOULD BE MADE AS NECESSARY. III -C MANDATORY STANDARDS AND ALTERNATIVE HOUSING Mandatory, uniform standards for housing style, type and location are not appropriate because of the great diversity among cities and differences within cities relative to state of development, topography, lot and dwelling sizes, the mix of housing values and costs, and the .level of municipal services which are provided. Land use regulation is one of the tools city officials need to protect the health, safety, welfare, and interests of the city's residents. THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD NOT PASS LEGISLATION WHICH . SETS MANDATORY ZONING AND SUBDIVISION STANDARDS OR WHICH REMOVES ADDITIONAL LAND USE REGULATION AUTHORITY FROM LOCAL UNITS OF GOVERNMENT. CITIES SHOULD RETAIN THE AUTHORITY TO REGULATE THE LOCATION, SIZE, AMOUNT, AND TYPE OF HOUSING INCLUDING MANUFACTURED AND ACCESSORY HOUSING, WITHIN THEIR BOUNDARIES. -24- III -D FINANCING STATE AND REGIONAL HOUSING POLICIES Property taxes provide the major revenue source for most cities in the Metropolitan Area and the Minnesota property Tax System is one of the most complex systems in the nation. Unfortunately, the Legislature often times adds to the complexity of this system by changing it to benefit certain persons as a means to implement or finance social policy. The AMM believes that the property tax system is not the appropriate mechanism to finance state or regional housing policies and goals. THE AMM OPPOSES THE USE OF THE PROPERTY TAX SYSTEM TO FINANCE OR IMPLEMENT STATE OR REGIONAL HOUSING POLICIES OR GOALS. STATE AND /OR REGIONAL HOUSING POLICIES AND GOALS SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED AND FINANCED BY NON- PROPERTY TAX SOURCES. III -E FEDERAL AND STATE HOUSING FUNDING The Federal and State levels of government have a broader and more diverse tax base than local units of government and should provide the necessary funding to fulfill their housing policy commitments to lower income persons. This funding commitment is needed to provide adequate housing for those persons unable to afford market rate housing. FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING FOR HOUSING SHOULD BE PROVIDED TO IMPLEMENT THE HOUSING POLICIES OF THOSE LEVELS AND MATCH THE NEEDS OF THOSE PERSONS REQUIRING ASSISTED HOUSING INCLUDING ASSISTANCE FOR RENOVATING AND REHABILITATING SUBSTANDARD HOUSING UNITS. III -F AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR LOCAL HOUSING PROGRAMS There is a great diversity among the cities in the metropolitan area. Some cities need more housing for low and moderate income persons while other cities need more housing for middle and upper income persons. Cities should have the authority to promote whichever kind of housing is within the public purpose and best interest of the city. State and federal agencies should cooperate with cities in developing workable programs to meet the diverse needs of cities. Cities need to have more control over the cost of housing being developed if they are to meet the intent of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act. Municipalities may be able to require reduced cost housing, but it is preferable to have this authority specified directly by statute. CITIES SHOULD BE GRANTED SUFFICIENT AUTHORITY AND FLEXIBILITY BY THE LEGISLATURE TO CONDUCT HOUSING PROGRAMS THAT MEET THE DIFFERING NEEDS OF DIVERSE CITIES AND THAT ENABLE CITIES TO -25- COMPLY WITH THE METROPOLITAN LAND PLANNING ACT WHICH DIRECTS CITIES TO PROVIDE OPPORTUNITY FOR LOW AND MODERATE COST HOUSING. CITIES SHOULD BE ALLOWED, TO REQUIRE LOWER COST HOUSING IN PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS AND TO REQUIRE THE DEDICATION OF LAND OR CASH FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE REQUIRED DEDICATION FOR PARKS. ALSO, CITIES SHOULD HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DEVELOP HOUSING FOR MIDDLE AND UPPER INCOME PERSONS IF THAT IS NEEDED TO ACHIEVE A BALANCED HOUSING STOCK. CITIES SHOULD CONTINUE TO HAVE AUTHORITY TO-USE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING TO ACHIEVE GOALS FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING. III -G RENTAL HOUSING IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA Rental housing plays an important role in the Twin Cities housing market. Approximately 35 per cent of the housing units in the Twin Cities region are rental units. Traditionally, rental units have provided an affordable housing option for singles, young adults, young married, students, the elderly, and low and moderate income households. Rental housing units serve a market much more diverse than that served by owner occupied units. Yet over the past several years a number of problems have developed in the rental market, including: 1. A reduction in the rate of new rental units being produced. 2. Lack of mobility for households to move from rental to ownership status. 3. The combination of few additions to the supply of rental units, increased competition for rental units, conversion .of rental units to condominiums and increased operating costs, has created a situation where many rental units are not an affordable option for low and moderate income households. 4. The supply of existing rental units, which is predominately efficiency and one bedroom units, does not adequately address the needs of families seeking rental units. ALL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT SHOULD BECOME INVOLVED TO SUCCESSFULLY ADDRESS THE PROBLEMS IN THE RENTAL HOUSING MARKET. IN PARTICULAR, THE STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS HAVE CRUCIAL ROLES IN PROVIDING AN OVERALL INVESTMENT CLIMATE IN WHICH THE PRIVATE SECTOR CAN PRODUCE AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF RENTAL UNITS. POSSIBLE ACTIONS INCLUDE: MODIFYING FEDERAL AND STATE TAX POLICIES TO IMPROVE THE PRODUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING. -26- INCREASING THE LEVEL OF FUNDING ASSISTANCE AIMED AT GIVING LOW AND MODERATE INCOME FAMILIES ACCESS TO DECENT HOUSING. - CONTINUING PROGRAMS WHICH USE TAX EXEMPT BONDING TO CREATE BELOW MARKET RATE FUNDS.FOR RENTAL HOUSING. CONTINUING PROGRAMS WHICH ALLOW REHABILITATION AND WEATHERIZATION PROGRAMS TO BE UTILIZED ON RENTAL UNITS. GRANTING LOCAL UNITS MORE AUTHORITY TO REGULATE THE CONVERSION OF RENTAL UNITS TO CONDOMINIUMS. III -H ASSESSMENT RATES FOR RENTAL PROPERTY The Multi- housing association and other groups have been advocating lower assessment rates for rental housing. A number of Legislators have also been examining this matter with a particular focus on the difference in rates between rental housing and owner occupied housing which results in higher property taxes for rental housing. The AMM is very concerned about the affordability or rental housing for lower income persons and does not oppose a thoughtfull study of this issue. THE AMM BELIEVES ANY LEGISLATIVE PROPOSAL WHICH WOULD REDUCE THE TAXES FOR RENTAL PROPERTY SHOULD CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING CONCEPTS: A CLEAR DIRECT LINKAGE BETWEEN THE REDUCTION OF TAXES AND THE AFFORDABILITY OF THE UNIT WITH RESPECT TO NEW CONSTRUCTION; A CLEAR DIRECT LINKAGE TO LOWER RENTS IF APPLIED TO EXISTING HOUSING; FULL DISCLOSURE OF REVENUE IMPLICATIONS FOR LOCAL UNITS OF GOVERNMENT. -27- METROPOLITAN AREA ISSUES AND CONCERNS PAGE 28 THROUGH 41 IV METROPOLITAN AREA ISSUES & CONCERNS IV. PHILOSOPHY WITH RESPECT TO METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES Some metropolitan issues are beyond the scope of a single governing body. Therefore, when such issues arise, it is in the interest of all concerned for governing units to cooperate in reaching a solution. There are a few problems which are of such magnitude that they encompass the concerns of the entire metropolitan area and such problems and issues must necessarily be dealt with by a metropolitan unit. That unit, however should act in cooperation with local governing bodies by attempting to identify the best solution before determining courses of action. Metropolitan Agencies and Local Governmental Units should be viewed as partners with each respecting the role of the other in solving these problems. IV -A PURPOSE OF METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES The political fragmentation of this metropolitan area and the diverse fiscal conditions, geographic locations, and size of the local units of government results in the need for a regional service delivery system to provide certain services or portions of certain services to most effectively and efficiently satisfy the needs of the residents living in this area. Examples of this type of regional service needs are the prevention of pollution, provision of certain transportation functions, etc. There is also a need for some planning on a metropolitan basis which must be done in cooperation with local government. The federal and state governments require that some grant applications be reviewed by a regional agency to determine consistency of these applications with regional plans and programs. THE PRIMARY AND PREDOMINATE PURPOSES OF THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND METROPOLITAN AGENCIES SHOULD BE TO COORDINATE THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE METROPOLITAN AREA: TO PROVIDE WITHOUT NEEDLESS DUPLICATION THOSE AREA WIDE SERVICES WHICH ARE BEYOND THE CAPABILITY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL UNITS TO PROVIDE INDIVIDUALLY AND JOINTLY: TO PROVIDE AREA WIDE PLANNING WHERE NECESSARY WITH COOPERATION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL UNITS: AND TO FULFILL THE REGIONAL REVIEW RESPONSIBILITIES FOR GRANTS AND LOANS AS DIRECTED BY THE STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS. IV -B CRITERIA FOR EXTENSION OF METROPOLITAN ORGANIZATION POWERS There is a natural tendency of any organization to seek more authority in both breadth and depth; therefore, increased authority to the Council and its agencies should contain carefully considered specific direction. I:E THE LEGISLATURE, IN GRANTING THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY TO UNDERTAKE AN ACTIVITY, SHOULD SPECIFICALLY STATE THE AUTHORITY BEING GRANTED AND NOT INCLUDE GENERAL LEGISLATIVE LANGUAGE SUCH AS... "INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SUCH MATTERS AS..." ANY EXPANSION OR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ONLY WHEN AT LEAST ONE OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS EXISTS: -THE SERVICE, FUNCTION, OR ACTIVITY HAS BEEN SHOWN TO BE NEEDED AND IT CAN BE DEMONSTRATED THAT IT CANNOT BE EFFECTIVELY OR EFFICIENTLY PROVIDED OR ADMINISTERED THROUGH EXISTING GENERAL PURPOSE UNITS OF GOVERNMENT. - INTERVENTION ON A REGIONAL BASIS IS NEEDED FOR PROTECTION OF THE REGIONAL INVESTMENT IN THE METROPOLITAN PHYSICAL SERVICE SYSTEM. IV -C STRUCTURES, PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION AND FUNDING OF METROPOLITAN SERVICES AND PROGRAMS The Metropolitan Council was established by the Legislature in 1967 to coordinate "the planning and development" of the Metropolitan Area. The Council, as initially established, was mostly advisory but was given responsibility for regional policy development and coordination in the areas of wastewater treatment and disposal, land transportation and airports. The Council was given limited approval authority for development proposals which were of metropolitan (regional) significance.. The Council, in its infancy, was given no direct operational authority and instead the Legislature created two new Metropolitan Commissions (MWCC and MTC) and restructured the MAC to actually operate and provide those services. In subsequent sessions, the Metropolitan Council's responsibility was expanded to include regional parks and open space, solid waste, regional review authority, approval authority for controlled access highways and approval authority for certain elements (airports, transportation, parks and open space, and sewers) of local comprehensive plans. However, the Council was not given operational or implementation authority in these areas. There was one exception to this general division of responsibility: the Council was given regional HRA operational authority but the Council can only operate this authority in a city at the request of that city. C -1 POLICY PLANNING - POLICY IMPLEMENTATION The historic legislative intent concerning separation of responsibility for metropolitan (regional) policy planning and policy implementation should be reaffirmed. THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SHOULD BE A PLANNING AND COORDINATING -29- BODY; AND REGIONAL PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION AND OPERATIONS SHOULD BE CARRIED OUT THROUGH THE EXISTING METROPOLITAN AGENCIES AND /OR GENERAL PURPOSE UNITS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT. C -2 METROPOLITAN STRUCTURE AND STRUCTURAL RELATIONSHIPS The structure of the various Metropolitan Agencies and Commissions (MAC, MWCC, RTB, MPOSC, etc.) is not uniform nor are the interrelationships between these agencies and the Metropolitan Council uniform. Function has basically determined form and the AMM does not believe that uniformity just for the sake of uniformity is important. THE AMM DOES RECOMMEND, HOWEVER, THAT THE LEGISLATURE EXAMINE THREE SPECIFIC ASPECTS OF THE METROPOLITAN STRUCTURE AND INTERRELATIONSHIPS TO DETERMINE IF CHANGE WOULD ENHANCE AND IMPROVE REGIONAL PLANNING /SERVICE DELIVERY. THESE ASPECTS ARE: MOST APPROPRIATE APPOINTING AUTHORITY FOR THE CHAIRS OF THE MWCC, MSFC AND THE RTB; MOST APPROPRIATE APPOINTING AUTHORITY FOR THE CHAIR AND MAC COMMISSIONERS; AND THE LARGE DEGREE OF INDEPENDENCE THAT MAC HAS FROM METROPOLITAN COUNCIL OVERSIGHT AS COMPARED TO THE RTB AND MWCC. C -3 FUNDING FOR REGIONALLY PROVIDED SERVICES The Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Agencies .funding has evolved over a period of time and is a mixture of property taxes, user fees, federal and state pass through revenues, etc. There has been some discussion to replace these sources with a single new revenue source. THE AMM WOULD OPPOSE THE IMPOSITION OF A SINGLE REVENUE SOURCE TO FUND REGIONAL SERVICES AS A NEW SOURCE OR AS A REPLACEMENT FOR THE PRESENT FUNDING SCHEME. C -4 REGIONAL TAX RATES AND USER FEES. The Legislature controls the maximum tax rates that can be levied by the Metropolitan Council and the other Metropolitan Agencies. We believe it should continue to do so. User fees are generally controlled by the Metropolitan Agency collecting the fees (MAC, MWCC and MTC) but the Legislature has on occasion imposed caps on the user fees. The setting of user fees, and the process for setting fees has generally not been considered a problem by local officials except for the user fees controlled by the MWCC. A major management study and rate study have been conducted of the MWCC. Based on the foregoing, the AMM believes that: USER FEES FOR REGIONAL SERVICES SHOULD NOT BE SET BY THE LEGISLATURE BUT SHOULD BE DETERMINED BY THE OPERATING AGENCY -30- PROVIDING THE SERVICE. USER FEE CHARGES SHOULD BE REVIEWED BY THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL TO ENSURE THAT SUCH CHARGES ARE CONSISTENT WITH REGIONAL SYSTEM PLANS AND GOALS. A UNIFORM PROCESS /PROCEDURE SHOULD BE DEVELOPED FOR USER FEE CHANGES UNDER GUIDANCE OF THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC'S INTEREST IN THIS MATTER. IV -D METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE ACCOUNTABILITY There has been a concern since the creation of the Metropolitan Governance system in 1967 with respect to the accountability of this "system" to the people it serves and to the Legislature which created the system. The AMM has been a leader in seeking ways to improve accountability of this system in the confines of a process that does not have the traditional checks and balances of the ballot box. Substantial changes were made by the Legislature in 1986 which should lead to improved accountability and service delivery. THE AMM COMMENDS THE LEGISLATURE FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS MADE DURING THE LAST SESSION AND DOES NOT BELIEVE THAT ADDITIONAL SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES DEALING WITH "ACCOUNTABILITY" SHOULD BE MADE UNTIL THERE HAS BEEN SUFFICIENT EXPERIENCE WITH THE PRESENT SYSTEM TO DETERMINE THE NEED FOR FURTHER CHANGE. (THE STUDY ITEMS LISTED IN POLICY IV C -2 WOULD BE AN EXCEPTION IF SUCH STUDY INDICATES THAT CHANGES WOULD BE BENEFICIAL). IV -E GREEN ACRES MUSA LINE M.S. 273.111 sets forth a procedure and delineates guidelines whereby certain taxes and assessments may be deferred for qualifying agricultural property. The intent was to enable farmers to continue to use their land for. agricultural purposes and to not be forced into selling their property for other uses because of higher urban taxes and special assessments. In the Metropolitan Area "green . acre deferements" have largely been replaced by a concept called agricultural preserves which requires the participation of the local unit in designating land to be included in preserves. The usage of "green acres" within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) appears to be in conflict with the philosophy which led to the establishment of the MUSA concept. THE AMM RECOMMENDS THE PHASE OUT OF THE "GREEN ACRE STATUS" FOR ALL PROPERTY SO DESIGNATED UNDER MS 273.111 WITHIN THE MUSA UNLESS SPECIFIC APPROVAL FOR CONTINUING EACH DESIGNATION IS GRANTED BY THE HOST MUNICIPALITY. NO NEW "GREEN ACRE" DESIGNATIONS SHALL BE ALLOWED UNLESS APPROVED BY THE HOST MUNICIPALITY. IV -F MINNESOTA INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS -31- Presidential Executive: Order No. 12372 as amended-by Executive Order No. 12416 eliminated the Federal A -95 Review Process and authorized each state to establish its own process. Minnesota Sessions Laws 1983, Chapter 289, Section 49 authorized the State - Planning Agency to adopt a state process. Such review and state processes must be recognized by the Federal Agencies. A State Inter Governmental Review of Federal Programs process was - adopted in 1984 and appears to be. satisfactory. Any revision to the state process should be consistent with the principles listed below. F -1 GUIDELINES FOR STATE PROCESS THE STATE PROCESS (PROCEDURES) MUST BE APPLICABLE AND CONSISTENT ON A STATEWIDE BASIS WITH SPECIFIED CRITERIA TO DETERMINE WHICH FEDERAL PROGRAMS, PROPOSALS AND PROJECTS ARE SUBJECT TO THE INTER - GOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS. PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS SHOULD NOT BE ADDED OR DELETED FROM THE LIST WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE. F -2 REGIONAL REVIEW AGENCY THE REGIONAL AGENCIES REVIEW AUTHORITY, SHOULD BE LIMITED TO JUDGING THE PROGRAMS, PROPOSALS, PROJECTS CONSISTENCY WITH REGIONAL PLANS, GOALS AND POLICIES. NO PREFERENCE OR PRIORITY SHOULD BE GIVEN TO PROJECTS, PROGRAMS OR PROPOSALS WHICHw . EXCEED THE REGIONAL OR STATE REQUIREMENTS AS OPPOSED TO THOSE PROJECTS, PROGRAMS OR PROPOSALS WHICH MEET THE REGIONAL OR STATE REQUIREMENTS. EACH PROGRAM PROJECT PROPOSAL SHOULD BE REVIEWED PRIMARILY ON ITS OWN MERITS AND THE REGIONAL REVIEWING AGENCY SHOULD DOCUMENT ITS REASONS FOR CONSIDERING FACTORS NOT DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE PROGRAM, PROJECT, PROPOSAL. F -3 NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS, SHOULD BE AS STRINGENT AS THOSE FORMERLY REQUIRED BY A -95. IV -G ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS M.S. Chapter 116D sets forth the basic environmental review Procedure for this state. Since environmental reviews can cause significant delay, create uncertainty for the developer, and add to project costs ultimately paid for by the consumer; it is important that the review procedure be simple and straightforward and yet thorough enough to assure that all important issues and concerns are addressed. Improvements have been made in recent years by the Legislature and the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) to streamline the process and make it more difficult to abuse the process. We commend them for these positive -32- improvements. THE AMM BELIEVES THAT AN APPROPRIATE BALANCE HAS BEEN STRUCK BETWEEN THE NEED TO PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT AND THE DESIRE TO ENHANCE AND IMPROVE THE ECONOMIC CLIMATE WITH RESPECT TO DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE STATES ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCEDURE (M.S. CHAPTER 116 D). NO SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES SHOULD BE MADE UNTIL THERE HAS BEEN SUFFICIENT EXPERIENCE TO DETERMINE IF CHANGES ARE NEEDED. IV -H COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING - LOCAL AND REGIONAL INTERACTION Implementation of the legislation passed in 1976 mandating the completion of local and regional comprehensive plans is complete. Planning, however, is an ongoing process, and several precepts should be kept in mind by Local Units of Government, Metropolitan Agencies, and the State as this planning process continues during the 19801s. METROPOLITAN SYSTEM PLANS, MUST CONTINUE TO BE SUFFICIENTLY SPECIFIC IN TERMS OF LOCATIONS, CAPACITIES, AND TIMING TO ALLOW FOR CONSIDERATION IN LOCAL COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING. THE REGIONAL INVESTMENT IN METROPOLITAN PHYSICAL SERVICE SYSTEMS (TRANSPORTATION, WASTEWATER TREATMENT, AIRPORTS, AND PARK AND OPEN SPACE) SHOULD CONTINUE TO BE PROTECTED BY PREVENTING ADVERSE IMPACT ON THESE SYSTEMS DUE TO LACK OF 'INTEGRATION BETWEEN REGIONAL AND LOCAL PLANNING. LOCAL OFFICIALS MUST HAVE EFFECTIVE INPUT INTO THE REGIONAL PLANNING PROCESS ON AN ONGOING'BASIS. DESIGNATION OF OTHER REGIONAL PLANS AS METROPOLITAN SYSTEMS PLANS SHOULD NOT BE MADE UNLESS THERE IS A COMPELLING METROPOLITAN AREA WIDE PROBLEM OR CONCERN THAT CAN ONLY BE SOLVED THROUGH A REGIONAL SYSTEM DESIGNATION. -33- IV -J METROPOLITAN COUNCIL BUDGET The Metropolitan Council has an annual budget of several million dollars and impacts the two million people living in the metropolitan area. Its budget document should convey enough information so that the residents can determine what product is being produced and how much the product costs. The budget document should be prepared early enough in the annual adoption process so that the residents can provide meaningful input as to program activities and .program priorities. J -1 BUDGET DETAIL AND SPECIFICITY Eventhough, the Annual Budget and Work Program document has been improved in recent years to contain more detail and specificity which enables interest groups to make more reasoned recommendations, further improvements could be made. MANDATED OR NON DISCRETIONARY PROJECTS, PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED. PROJECTS, PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES WHICH MAY BE DISCRETIONARY BUT ARE TOTALLY FUNDED BY A FEDERAL OR STATE GRANT SHOULD ALSO BE IDENTIFIED. MORE INFORMATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED AS TO PREVIOUS YEARS EXPENDITURES FOR ON -GOING PROGRAMS, PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES. J -2 POST HEARING BUDGET INCREASES The Council has significantly increased its budget several months into the budget year in each of the last several years. The AMM believes this detracts from the official open budget process and should not become an annual occurrence. THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SHOULD REVIEW ITS TOTAL BUDGET PROCESS SO THAT IT HAS APPROPRIATE FACTUAL INFORMATION AT THE TIME IT ADOPTS THE ANNUAL BUDGET AND WORK PROGRAM TO MINIMIZE THE NEED FOR MAJOR BUDGET AMENDMENTS AFTER INITIAL ADOPTION. IF BUDGET AMENDMENTS ARE NECESSARY, THE COUNCIL SHOULD ENSURE THAT THE AMENDMENT PROCESS PROVIDES ADEQUATE NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC AND THAT THE PUBLIC BE PROVIDED THE OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT. -34- J -3 RELIANCE ON PROPERTY TAXES The AMM is concerned by the growing reliance on the property tax to support Council activities. Federal grants used to fund about two /thirds of the Council Budget and the local property tax about one - third. The ratio is now reversed. THE COUNCIL SHOULD MAKE A THOROUGH EXAMINATION OF THE ACTIVITIES FORMERLY FUNDED BY FEDERAL GRANTS TO DETERMINE IF THEY ARE STILL NECESSARY AND WORTHWHILE WHEN ONLY LOCAL DOLLARS ARE INVOLVED. ADDITIONALLY THE COUNCIL SHOULD SEEK TO DIVEST ITSELF OF SERVICES THAT IT PERFORMS FOR THIS AREA, IF SUCH SERVICES ARE PERFORMED BY STATE AGENCIES FOR THE BALANCE OF THE STATE. ALSO, ACTIVITIES WHICH MAY BE FUNDED THROUGH FEDERAL OR STATE GRANTS SHOULD NOT BE PURSUED MERELY BECAUSE MONEY IS AVAILABLE UNLESS THERE IS A REAL NEED TO BE SATISFIED AND WHICH WILL PROVIDE A BENEFIT FOR RESIDENTS OF THE METROPOLITAN AREA. IV -L METROPOLITAN PARKS AND OPEN SPACE FUNDING The 1974 Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Act established the Metropolitan Parks and Open Space system and provided state /regional fiscal support for acquisition and development of the regional park system and provided a "payment in lieu of taxes" to local units of government on a decreasing basis over a four year period for land removed from the tax rolls. Partial funding for the operation and maintenance of regional parks was provided by the legislature in 1985. L -1 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE -35- Due to increased usage, a leveling of state aids and the impact of 'levy limit restrictions; it is becoming increasingly difficult for the implementing agencies to operate and maintain these regional facilities. Furthermore, regional parks provide the same basic function in the metropolitan area as state parks provide in outstate Minnesota and State funding is provided for operation and maintenance of state parks. THE AMM RECOMMENDS THAT THE STATE CONTINUE TO PROVIDE PARTIAL FUNDING TO IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES TO HELP PAY FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION COSTS OF THE REGIONAL PARKS AND OPEN SPACE SYSTEM. THE STATE /REGIONAL FUNDS SHOULD BE IN THE FORM OF A CONTINUING REVENUE SOURCE NOT DEPENDENT UPON BIENNIAL LEGISLATIVE APPROPRIATION AND PREFERABLY FROM A SOURCE OTHER THAN THE PROPERTY TAX. THE REGIONAL PARKS SHOULD REMAIN UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES (CITIES AND COUNTIES). L -2 FUNDING FOR IMPACTS OF REGIONAL PARKS ON HOST COMMUNITIES Except for the four year "payment in lieu of taxes; no provision was made to mitigate the continuing cost impacts of a regional park facility on a "host community ", when such community is not the owner of the facility. The cost impacts include such items as increased public safety costs, street and road maintenance, litter cleanup, permanent loss of tax revenues, etc. THE AMM RECOMMENDS THAT AS A CONDITION FOR RECEIVING REGIONAL OR STATE FUNDING FOR A REGIONAL PARK FACILITY, THE FACILITY OWNER AND OPERATOR MUST NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE HOST COMMUNITY TO REIMBURSE IT FOR THE COST IMPACTS ON THE HOST COMMUNITY. IV -M SURFACE WATER The Legislature in 1982 adopted a Surface Water Management Act for the 7- county metropolitan area. The Act as passed and as amended in 1984 addressed most of the concerns raised by the AMM and we do not see the need for major amendments at this point in time. If the Legislature considers changes such legislation should not diminish emphasis on the following principles: THE COST TO LOCAL UNITS OF GOVERNMENT FOR PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTING THIS ACT MUST REMAIN OUTSIDE OF LEVY LIMITS AND ADDITIONAL MANDATES PLACED ON LOCAL UNITS OF GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE FULLY FUNDED BY STATE RAISED REVENUES. A METROPOLITAN AREA WIDE AD VALORUM PROPERTY TAX SHOULD NOT BE ESTABLISHED TO PAY FOR SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT (PLANNING, PROJECTS, MAINTENANCE) EXCEPT FOR REGIONAL PLANNING OR PROJECTS THAT ARE JUDGED TO BE OF METROPOLITAN SIGNIFICANCE PER M.S. 473.173. THE AUTHORITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ASSIGNED TO THE VARIOUS UNITS AND LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT BY THE 1982 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT ACT SEEM TO BE IN -36- GOOD BALANCE. LOCAL UNITS OF GOVERNMENT WITHIN_THE 7- COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREA SHOULD BE ELIGIBLE TO PARTICIPATE -IN ANY STATE -WIDE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT GRANT PROGRAM. IV -N HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT The problem of regulating, controlling and disposing of hazardous materials in an environmentally sound manner is one of the major issues of this decade both nationally and locally. Major state legislation addressing this issue was enacted in 1980 and amended in subsequent years. The cumulative affect of the legislation was the establishment of an on -going management and control system for the handling and disposal of hazardous materials where responsibility is centralized at the state level but requires the cooperation and support of all levels of government. The AMM does not perceive the need for changes or additional legislation. However, any future legislation that may be considered should enhance and not diminish emphasis on the following principles: N -1 EFFECTIVE PLANNING PARTIES OR AGENCIES WHO GENERATE HAZARDOUS WASTE SHOULD BE INVOLVED IN ALL PHASES OF PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTING THE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEM. N -2 ABATEMENT - REDUCTION - RESOURCE RECOVERY GENERATORS SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED TO MODIFY THEIR PRODUCTION PROCESSES TO RE -USE, RECOVER /RECYCLE AS MUCH HAZARDOUS WASTE AS POSSIBLE AND TO USE LESS HAZARDOUS RAW MATERIALS IN THEIR MANUFACTURING PROCESSES. ENCOURAGEMENT COULD BE GIVEN THRU INCENTIVES /DISINCENTIVES. N -3 HANDLING, STORAGE, DISPOSAL ALL PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE "HAZARDOUS WASTE STREAM" (FROM GENERATION TO DISPOSAL) MUST BE REQUIRED TO HANDLE WASTE IN A MANNER THAT WILL ASSURE THAT THESE WASTES ARE PROPERLY IDENTIFIED, COLLECTED, TREATED, TRANSPORTED, ETC. AND ULTIMATELY DISPOSED OF IN A SAFE MANNER. N -4 PRIVATE OWNERSHIP THE PRIVATE SECTOR SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED TO OWN, OPERATE AND MANAGE HAZARDOUS WASTE PROCESSING, TREATMENT, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES UNDER STRINGENT STATE REGULATION AND LICENSING AND BACKED BY STATE LIABILITY. UNDERGROUND OR IN- GROUND BURIAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTES SHOULD ONLY BE USED AS A LAST RESORT AND IF THIS BECOMES NECESSARY, THE PRIME CRITERIA FOR SITE SELECTION SHOULD BE GEOLOGICAL ACCEPTABILITY AND SAFETY. -37- N -5 COMPENSATION- INCENTIVES FOR HOST COMMUNITIES COMPENSATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED TO HOST COMMUNITIES SIMILAR TO THE COMPENSATION PROVIDED FOR SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS. N -6 EXISTING SITE CLEAN -UP AND LIABILITY THE MPCA SHOULD PROCEED POST HASTE TO CLEAN -UP AND DECONTAMINATE THE EXISTING HAZARDOUS WASTE SITES BEFORE THERE IS FURTHER DAMAGE TO PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT. IF A RESPONSIBLE PARTY CAN BE IDENTIFIED, THAT PARTY SHOULD BE LIABLE FOR CLEAN -UP COSTS, REMEDIAL ACTION. COSTS AND PERSONAL INJURY DAMAGES AS DEFINED IN LAW. IF A RESPONSIBLE PARTY CANNOT BE IDENTIFIED OR IF RESPONSIBILITY IS CONTESTED, THEN THE CLEAN -UP SHOULD BE FINANCED BY THE STATE SUPERFUNDS OR FEDERAL. IV -0 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA The solid waste management system in place in the 7- county area is basically a three - tiered system whereby cities control and regulate collection; counties are responsible for 'siting' new landfills, developing abatement plans, developing processing facilities and regulating existing landfills; and the Metropolitan Council has regional planning and coordinating responsibilities. The system was intended to foster and encourage abatement, recycling and resource recovery for as much of the waste stream as possible and then to assure environmentally sound landfill disposal for the remaining solid waste. Maximum cooperation and coordination among and between the various levels and units of government and the private sector is needed if the system is to work as intended. 0 -1 CONSOLIDATION OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES As indicated in the previous paragraph, the responsibilities for managing solid waste in the Metropolitan Area are shared by the Metropolitan Council, Counties and Cities and Towns. The AMM believes that if the area is to reach its mandate of no more landfilling of unprocessed solid waste by 1991, the responsibilities for source separation and recycling related activities must be more centrally coordinated at the county level. THE AMM RECOMMENDS THAT THE COUNTIES ASSUME THE RESPONSIBILITIES FOR ALL SOURCE SEPARATION AND RECYCLING RELATED ACTIVITIES AND PROJECTS. WHERE A CITY IS NOT MEETING THE COUNTY ESTABLISHED GOALS THE MUNICIPALITIES WOULD RETAIN ONLY LIMITED AUTHORITY TO REGULATE THE COLLECTION OF SOLID WASTE TO PROTECT THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THEIR RESIDENTS. 0 -2 ALTERNATIVES TO LANDFILLS All levels and units of government and the private sector should participate and cooperate in planning amd managing the solid waste stream to assure a cost efficient and environmentally sound solid waste management system. Landfilling should only be used as a last resort and then only for "processed" solid waste or for those materials which can not be recycled, reused, or disposed of in a more acceptable manner. THE AMM ENDORSES ABATEMENT, RECYCLING AND RESOURCE RECOVERY ACTIVITIES AND PROGRAMS TO REDUCE THE NEED FOR IN- GROUND DISPOSAL OF UNPROCESSED SOLID WASTE. THE AMM ALSO BELIEVES THAT THE EXISTING SUBSIDY LEVELS FOR THE HOUSEHOLD REBATE PROGRAM AND THE TONNAGE REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM OUGHT TO BE INCREASED SUBSTANTIALLY SO THAT CITIES CAN DEVELOP AND OPERATE EFFECTIVE RECYCLING PROGRAMS. YARD WASTES SHOULD ALSO BE INCLUDED AS AN ELIGIBLE ITEM IN THE TONNAGE PROGRAM. (IF POLICY 0 -1 IS ADOPTED THEN COUNTIES RATHER THAN CITIES WOULD RECEIVE THE ABOVE REIMBURSEMENTS). 0 -3 DISPOSAL DEADLINES Current law contains a deadline that will prohibit the disposal of "unprocessed" solid waste in landfills effective January 1, 1991. The AMM supports this prohibition provided that sufficient alternatives are on line to process the solid waste generated in the Metropolitan Area by that date at a reasonable cost. THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SHOULD MONITOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ALTERNATIVE FACILITIES FOR THE PROCESSING OF SOLID WASTE ON A CONTINUOUS BASIS TO ASSURE THAT ADEQUATE PROCESSING CAPACITY WILL BE AVAILABLE BY 1991. DEFINITIVE INFORMATION MUST BE PROVIDED TO THE LEGISLATURE BY JANUARY 1, 1990 SO THAT THE 1991 DEADLINE CAN BE MODIFIED AS NEEDED. 0 -4 COMPENSATION AND INCENTIVES FOR HOST COMMUNITIES Solid waste landfills have many undesireable impacts on the "host" communities and they should be compensated for all direct and indirect costs associated with the undesireable impacts such a facility has on the community. THE AMM SUPPORTS THE CURRENT COMPENSATION LEVEL AND BELIEVES IT SHOULD BE CONTINUED. AS OTHER MAJOR SOLID WASTE PROCESSING FACILITIES GO ON LINE (SUCH AS INCINERATION TYPE FACILITIES), THE IMPACT OF THESE FACILITIES ON THE HOST COMMUNITIES SHOULD BE CAREFULLY MONITORED TO DETERMINE IF THEY ALSO HAVE SIGNIFICANT UNDESIREABLE IMPACTS AS OPPOSED TO BENEFITS. IF SO, SOME FORM OF COMPENSTATION MAY ALSO BE NECESSARY FOR THOSE COMMUNITIES. 0 -5 FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL, PERSONAL AND PROPERTY DAMAGES THE AMM SUPPORTS THE CURRENT FUNDING LEVEL AND BELIEVES IT SHOULD -39- BE CONTINUED TO PROVIDE HELP TO PERSONS OR COMMUNITEIS INJURED OR DAMAGED BY ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL INCIDENTS CAUSED BY LANDFILL CONTAMINATION. (I.E. REAL OR PERSONAL PROPERTY DAMAGE, PERSONAL INJURIES, CLEAN -UP ACTIVITIES, ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLIES, ETC.). COUNTIES MUST EXERCISE THEIR STATUTORY RESPONSIBILITIES TO ASSURE THAT LANDFILLS ARE INSPECTED AND OPERATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND COUNTY REQUIREMENTS. 0 -6 COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES Counties have the major responsibilities for managing and implementing the solid waste disposal system and are authorized to charge a surtax of 25 cents per cubic yard, of solid waste to help pay for alternatives to land disposal. THE AMM SUPPORTS CONTINUATION OF THE COUNTY SURTAX AUTHORIZATION. THE AMM ALSO URGES THE COUNTIES TO RAPIDLY DEVELOP PREFERRED DISPOSAL TECHNIQUES WHICH ARE ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND AND COST EFFICIENT. 0 -7 TRANSFER STATION RULES AND REGULATIONS Metropolitan Counties are given the power to acquire by purchase, lease, gift or condemnation solid waste facilities or properties which includes transfer stations. Acquisition is permitted without compliance with local land use ordinances. Metropolitan cities have no protection, except through a review process, from improvident designation of transfer station sites. THE AMM URGES THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) TO QUICKLY EXERCISE ITS RESPONSIBILITIES AND PROMULGATE RULES AND REGULATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE SITING OF SOLID WASTE TRANSFER STATIONS. SUCH RULES AND REGULATIONS ARE NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE AFFECTED CITIES SINCE SUCH FACILITIES ARE NOT SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CITY ORDINANCES. IV -P COMBINED SEWERS - SEPARATION The three communities of Minneapolis, St. Paul and South St. Paul still have a significant amount of combined waste and storm water sewers which create overflows of untreated waste water into the Mississippi River during heavy rains and storm water runoff periods. These cities have over many years been progressing with sewer separation projects paid for primarily through local tax levies. The Federal and State governments are pressing the issue of meeting certain water quality standards in the Mississippi River consistantly which apparently cannot be done until separation is complete and the state did provide additional funding during the 1985 Legislative Session to help pay for the speed up. -40- r. V THE AMM RECOMMENDS THAT IF THE STATE GOVERNMENT CONTINUES TO PURSUE THE ACCELERATED COMBINED SEWER SEPARATION PROGRAM IN THE THREE CITIES, THAT IT ALSO CONTINUE TO PROVIDE FUNDING TO ENSURE THAT NEITHER LOCAL PROPERTY TAXES NOR METROPOLITAN SANITARY SEWER COSTS ARE INCREASED DUE TO THE ACCELERATED BUILD EFFORT. FURTHER, IF FEDERAL MONEY IS AVAILABLE TO ELIMINATE COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW PROBLEMS, IT SHOULD ALSO BE USED TO HELP COMPLETE THE SEPARATION PROJECTS IN THIS AREA. -41- ',. �,F .� • �. t; � � � -_ V TRANSPORTATION V -A STREET AND HIGHWAY FUNDING An efficient transportation system is a vital element in planning for physical, economic, and social development at the state, regional, and local levels. Funding for current roadway maintenance reconstruction, and construction of new streets and highways in developing areas is a significant major element of a competitive and safe transportation system. Due to past high inflation and declining state revenues there has been a tendency by the Legislature to divert much needed roadway funds to state general expenditure. This trend must be reversed and funding expanded to at least pace inflation plus growth to insure high quality transporation within the state and metropolitan region. THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE LEVEL OF FUNDS SO THAT NECESSARY STREET AND HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE MAY BE CONTINUED, NECESSARY NEW STREET AND HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION MAY OCCUR, AND THE MUNICIPAL STATE AID FUND LEVEL CONTINUES GROWTH. V -B MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE TAX TRANSFER The Motor Vehicle Excise Tax was significantly increased in the early 1980's and dedicated to the State General Fund to offset the affect of a declining economy and reduced state revenues. The Legislature recognized that Highway and Transit Program needs were growing and that ultimately additional funding would be needed in these areas. Thus, a transfer of this tax from General Fund to the Highway and Transit Funds was established starting with 25% in 1985 and finally reaching 100% in 1992. The transfer was suspended in 1986 and 1987 because of reduced state revenues after a short period of growth. Necessary street and highway construction and reconstruction is falling behind significantly. Without this source of funding, the roadway system will become a major state crisis. Therefore, THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO ALLOW CURRENT LAW GOVERNING THE MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE TAX TRANSFER TO REMAIN IN PLACE WITHOUTFURTHER SUSPENSION TO ENSURE SOME NEEDED GROWTH FOR STREET AND HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE, RECONSTRUCTION, AND NEW CONSTRUCTION. -42- IY " V -C HIGHWAY AND TRANSIT INTEGRATION An efficient Transportation System consists of both high quality roadway and high quality transit opportunities. These two elements must be considered together from early planning through implementation especially in high growth Metropolitan areas where the travel needs tend to glut to excess capacity new or expanded highways as soon as they are opened for use. The AMM understands that to some degree this is done in planning and that transit is considered somewhat when determining funding priorities for highway construction, however, it is felt that the integration of highway and transit is minimal and should be significantly increased. THE AMM. URGES MNDOT AND METROPOLITAN AGENCIES INVOLVED IN HIGHWAY AND TRANSIT PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION TO INTEGRATE THESE ACTIVITIES TO ENSURE AN EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM. CRITERIA USED TO DETERMINE HIGHWAY FUNDING FOR CONSTRUCTION AND EXPANSION SHOULD BE REVIEWED AND UPDATED TO REQUIRE PROVISIONS FOR DISCUSSION AND INCLUSION OF TRANSIT MODES AND OPPORTUNITIES IF APPROPRIATE ONLY WHEN THIS IS ACCOMPLISHED WILL THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM BE TRULY EFFICIENT AND COST EFFECTIVE. V -D METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM FUNDING Because of the large economically diverse population but rather compact nature of the Twin City Metropolitan Area, it is an absolute necessity to provide an effective and efficient public mass transit service augmented by a variety of programs,such as Rideshare and Project Mobility, to protect the economic viability of the area. Without a good transit system, the Metropolitan Highway system would not just be crowded, it would be totally inadequate. Many elderly and handicapped persons residing in the area primarily because of access to unique services would be almost totally immobile. Due to statutory constraints, there are no funding resources available for other units of government to pick up the difference if the programs are allowed to deteriorate. Therefore, legislative funding of transit programs through the RTB should be a high priority. THE AMM REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE TO CONSIDER THE METROPOLITAN TRANSIT PROGRAMS AS HIGH PRIORITY AND FUND THEM SUFFICIENTLY. FUNDING ALTERNATIVES SHOULD INCLUDE THE STATE GENERAL FUND MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE TAX, THE FARE BOX, PROPERTY TAX, AND SERVICE EFFICIENCIES. V -E TRANSIT NEEDS ASSESSMENT In recent years, the subject of light rail transit as a mass transit alternative for the area has been debated considerably. -43- f. The 1985 legislature put a hold on various light rail activities pending completion of a Metropolitan Transit Needs Assessment Study conducted by the Regional Transit Board (RTB). Based on the results of the Needs Assessment Study the legislature hopes to determine the type, of transit enhancements needed to provide an effective and efficient transit system in the near and mid range future. The appropriate mode of transportation; light rail, bus, van, other multiple occupancy vehicles, etc., will undoubtedly be a significant part of the implementation .discussion. At this time, the AMM is less concerned about modes of transit or implementation strategies as it is about the process to be used to make these final determinations. Therefore, THE AMM STRONGLY URGES THE RTB, METROPOLITAN COUNCIL, AND LEGISLATURE TO UTILIZE AN OPEN '3C' (CONTINUOUS, COMPREHENSIVE, AND COOPERATIVE) PROCESS INCLUDING DISCUSSION AND INPUT FROM TAB, TAC, LOCAL OFFICIALS, AND THE PUBLIC AT LARGE TO DISCUSS AND DEVELOP THE IMPLEMENTATION AND FUNDING STRATEGIES TO BE USED AS A RESULT OF THE FINDINGS OF THE METROPOLITAN TRANSIT NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY. V -F HIGHWAY JURISDICTIONAL REASSIGNMENT AND FUNDING The State Highway Study Commission and Metropolitan Jurisdictional Task Force have been studying the possibility of reclassifying many roadways in the state as to appropriate use classifications and jurisdiction. This reassignment in the metropolitan area is estimated to shift $6.1 million annually from the state and $1.2 million annually from the counties to the cities for an increase of $7.3 million annually for general maintenance and life cycle treatment (i.e. sealcoat, overlays, etc.). This task is appropriate, but will have a profound effect on city finances and future ability to maintain good road systems, especially if certain criteria are not met and finance alternatives established. Therefore, the AMM offers the following as a guide to continuing discussion and ongoing studies. THE AMM SUPPORTS JURISDICTIONAL REASSIGNMENT OF ROADS ON A PHASED BASIS BASED ON FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION AND OTHER APPROPRIATE CRITERIA SUBJECT TO A CORRESPONDING MECHANISM FOR FUNDING OF ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS AND CONTINUING MAINTENANCE SINCE CITIES DO NOT CURRENTLY HAVE THE FINANCIAL CAPACITY TO ABSORB THE ADDITIONAL ROADWAY RESPONSIBILITIES WITHOUT NEW FUNDING SOURCES. THE EXISTING MUNICIPAL TURNBACK FUND IS NOT ADEQUATE BASED ON CONTEMPLATED TURNBACKS. V -G STATE AND COUNTY HIGHWAY TURNBACKS Current state law provides that the state and /or county may declassify a trunk highway and turn it back to a local unit of government. The only provision is that it must be in -44- good condition. The unit receiving the highway does not have the option to refuse title and must, thereafter, maintain the turned back road. The local unit may add the turnback highway to its MSA highway mileage and even exceed the unit's mileage limit if it is already at its designated limit. This will qualify that particular stretch of street for MSA maintenance funds. However, two problems exist: 1) the maintenance allocation may not be sufficient if the street is a high volume carrier, such as Highway 8 through Ramsey County; and 2) the miles of turnback designated by the local unit as MSA streets will be deducted from the unit's future additional MSA allocation limit, thus forcing the local unit to totally maintain that portion from its local funds or lose the right to determine at its option other local streets as part of the MSA system. THE ASSOCIATION OF, METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE TO MODIFY THE LAW TO EITHER 1) ALLOW CITIES THE RIGHT TO REFUSE HIGHWAY TURNBACKS FROM THE STATE OR COUNTY, OR 2) ALLOW THE LOCAL UNITS MSA MILE LIMIT TO BE INCREASED BY THE MILES OF TURNBACK WITHOUT AFFECTING FUTURE ALLOCATIONS AND ESTABLISH A SPECIAL MAINTENANCE ALLOCATION FOR TURNED BACK HIGHWAY MILES BASED ON VOLUME OF USAGE. FURTHER, STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR TURNBACK ROADS SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED BY MNDOT IN CONJUNCTION WITH LOCAL UNITS OF GOVERNMENT, AND NOT MEETING THESE STANDARDS BE MADE PART OF THE CRITERIA FOR WHICH A CITY MAY REJECT THE TURNBACK. V -H '3C' TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS - ROLE OF ELECTED OFFICIALS The transportation planning process in the Twin City Metropolitan Area has been developed in response to a variety of federal and state laws and regulations. The Metropolitan Council (MC) was formally designated by the Legislature in 1974 (1974 MRA) as the agency responsible for the administration and coordination of said planning process. Included within this designation is the responsibility for long range comprehensive transportation planning required by Section 134 of the Federal Highway Act of 1962, Section 4 of Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964 and Section 112 of Federal Aid Highway Act of 1973, and such other federal transportation laws as may be enacted subsequently. The planning required under the federal laws is commonly referred to as the 13C' process (continuous, comprehensive, and cooperative), ` and the MC is the metropolitan planning organization (MPO) under federal terminology. Federal law and regulations require that the MPO function as "the forum for cooperative decision making by principal elected officials of general purpose local government" and receipt of federal financial aid for the planning, construction and operation of transportation improvements in urbanized areas is contingent upon the existence of a planning process which is satisfactory to federal authorities. When'the Legislature designated the MC as the transportation planning -45- agency for the metropolitan area, it also mandated the establishment of an "advisory body" to assist the MC and Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC), now Regional Transit Board, in carrying out their responsibilities. While specific duties were not assigned, the Legislature did specify that the advisory body would consist of citizen representatives, municipal, county, and appropriate state agency representatives. This advisory body is now called the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) and contains 17 local elected officials among its membership of about 30 officials. The MC has consistently viewed the role of TAB as an advisory body based on the 1974 MRA. Hence, local elected officials in this area do not play as vital a role in the federally mandated '3C' transportation planning process as was intended by federal law and regulation. Although, the Federal Regulations no longer require exclusive local official representation as the MC, they still maintain local official involvement in'the MC and '3C' process. In addition, the current elected official participation and '3C' process has worked reasonably well in this Metropolitan Area. THE AMM SUPPORTS AS A MINIMUM THE CONTINUATION OF THE CURRENT LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIALS INVOLVEMENT IN THE '3C' PROCESS. IF MODIFICATION IS CONSIDERED, THE AMM URGES GREATER LOCAL OFFICIAL INPUT IN THE SELECTION PROCESS OF THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY. -46- V -J MNDOT /CITY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS The 1984 Legislature modified payment proceedures for projects where the state and city share in the costs through cooperative agreements by allowing MNDOT to pay as the work proceeds. However, because of work load and the priority system used by MNDOT in preparing and authorizing cooperative agreements, some important local projects were being delayed. This has now been corrected administratively and the process is working. THE AMM URGES MNDOT TO CONTINUE A GOOD COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT PROCESS AND INITIATE CHANGES AS AND WHEN APPROPRIATE SO THAT MUNICIPAL AGREEMENTS CAN BE EXECUTED IN A TIMELY AND EFFICIENT MANNER. V -K MTC MEMBERSHIP The 1984 legislature created the Regional Transit Board, as a replacement for the then MTC which dealt with more than operations of the major public bus company, to separate transit alternative planning from bus company operations. In doing so the MTC was reduced from 8 members to 3 members, one each from Minneapolis, St. Paul, and the Suburbs. This arrangement has worked, but not as well as it could and it is not representative of the transit area population. THE AMM ENCOURAGES THE LEGISLATURE TO INCREASE MTC MEMBERSHIP TO FIVE BY ADDING TWO MORE SUBURBAN MEMBERS TO FACILITATE OPERATIONS AS A BOARD AND TO MORE EQUITABLY REPRESENT THE TRANSIT SERVICE AREA POPULATION. V -L LARGE TRUCKS The trucking industry has recently proposed to the state legislature allowing truck tractor and trailor combinations of up to 110 feet on Minnesota State Highways. Due to offtracking of rear wheels, acceleration distance needs,,and time and distance required for safe passing, current legal lengths are pushing the -47- limit of safety and physical ability of our interstate and trunk highway systems. Longer tractor /trailor combinations would only exacerbate these conditions beyond tolerable limits. To upgrade the Highway System to accommodate longer units would be very expensive reducing funding resources for other much needed critical projects. Once allowed on the interstate and designated trunk route highways there would undoubtedly by pressure to ' provide access to various local areas which would be prohibitive in cost for local upgrading and unacceptable for safety, Therefore, THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO NOT INCREASE TRUCK TRACTOR AND TRAILOR COMBINATION LENGTH LIMITS BEYOND CURRENT LIMITS DUE TO UNACCEPTABLE COST FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION AND FOR PROTECTION OF PUBLIC SAFETY. V -M MSA FUNDS FOR OPTICOM Optical Command System, Opticom, equipment is used by Public Safety vehicles to change traffic signals from the vehicle while on an emergency call. Opticom has proven successful in decreasing emergency vehicle intersection accidents and is in use in several metropolitan cities. However, it is expensive. Current MSA standards and regulations do not allow use of MSA funds for purchase of Opticom. THE AMM REQUESTS THE MSA SCREENING COMMITTEE TO ALLOW USE OF MSA HIGHWAY FUNDS FOR PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF OPTICOM SYSTEMS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHTS ON MSA STREETS. V -N MTC REDUCED SERVICE AREA MILL RATE Levies expressed in legislation as a mill limit such as the Metropolitan MTC levy of 2 mills are adjusted by personal property and recalculation of Homestead property as if it were assessed at 40 %, Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 273.13 subd. 7a, 275.49, and 272.64. However, when feathering for lower serviced areas was adopted in 473.446 subd. 1, it was written so that the Revenue Department interprets the reduction as a regular mill. This provision affects 45 cities in 1987. Thus, 2 mills levied equal an actual 3 mills and the half mill reduction is only a half mill not r a three quarter mill as was intended by the legislature. This equals a 50% less reduction than intended. THE AMM REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE TO MODIFY MINN. STATUTE CHAPTER 473.446 SUBD. 1 TO MAKE REDUCTION MILL CALCULATION FOR REDUCED TRANSIT SERVICE EQUIVALENT TO THE ORIGINAL LEVIED MILL CALCULATION. V -0 SEAT BELT VIOLATION PENALTIES The 1986 Legislature passed a mandatory seal belt usage law taking effect in August of 1986. Although this is a laudable action, it is somewhat meaningless without some type of penalty provision. If there is a reasonable basis for creating statute requiring the use of seat belts there is basis for providing penalties. THE AMM RECOMMENDS THE LEGISLATURE MODIFY THE MANDATORY SEAT BELT USAGE LAW BY ADDING A PENALTY PROVISION TO ENHANCE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE LEGISLATION. V -P METROPOLITAN HIGHWAY FUND It has been suggested recently that a Metropolitan Highway Fund be created for special projects presumably in conjunction with major economic development. On the surface this may seem a laudable idea but when scruitinized in depth raises some major. concerns. The first concern is funding source. If taken from Fiscal Disparities it is in reality an unequal property tax increase in the metro area. A direct metro wide property tax targeted for economic advantage to a few areas would be unpopular at best and considered by many to be unfair. A commercial /industrial property tax increase to help competitors would be unfair and increase the already large tax burden attributed to business. Any other funding source would be subject to the same dialogue. The second concern is the criteria for use and the beauracracy of decision making and how to insure absolute fairness. Finally, if a separate metropolitan fund exists to help construct special projects will more general highway funds be skewed to out state or will the legislature look at delaying or parceling off part of the motor vehicle excise tax for other than highway /transit use ?. THE AMM OPPOSES CREATION OF A METROPOLITAN HIGHWAY FUND BASED UPON THE UNCERTAINTY OF FUNDING SOURCE, FAIR ADMINISTRATION, AND POSSIBLE LOSS OF STATE FUNDS. -49- EDINA PARK BOARD 7:30 p.m. October 14, 1986 Edina City Hall MEMBERS PRESENT: Bill Lord, Marilyn "Wooldridge, Jean Rydell, Jim Fee, Mack Thayer, George Warner, Joan Lonsbury, Don Wineberg, STAFF PRESENT: Bob Kojetin, John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Diana Hedges, Madelyn Krinke OTHERS PRESENT: Members of Garden Council Joan Lonsbury called the meeting to order. I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF AUGUST 12, 1986 Don Wineberg MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 12, 1986 MEETING. Jim Fee seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. II. BUDGET - FEES AND CHARGES Bob Kojetin distributed a printed sheet of athletic association statistics which contained a recommendation to present to the athletic associations at a future meeting. (Copy "A" attached, ) Bob Kojetin explained that there are two men who work 7 -8 months per year, one on general park fields and one at Braemar. The Council, when reviewing the budget, recommended that the ball field maintenance be cut by- $31,000. Mr. Kojetin stated that he thought the Council's intent was that additional fees would be charged to the associations to cover the amount cut from the budget. Mr. Kojetin's question to the Park Board was, "should the Park & Recreation Department charge the fees to the associations to cover the $31,000 cut from the budget ". Joan Lonsbury.asked what some of the other communities are doing. Bob Kojetin said he was not sure what others are doing, except that in most communities there is a charge to adult athletics for using lighted fields. Bill Lord stated that he feels that ball fields must be maintained at the same level they have been in previous years because people living in Edina, paying taxes have a right to expect that quality and to ask the youth to pay another $5 to play on the fields is ridiculous. George Warner commented that before charging each participant the associations should be approached to see if they have surplus funds which could be used to help defray expenses. I Jim Fee agreed with the idea of going back to the council and asking them to reconsider the cut and at least allow Mr. Kojetin to have the option of making the $31,000 cut fr3m his total budge;. rather than just from ball field maintenance. John Keprios asked if the council expected the reduction in the budget would be made up by charging fees to the participants using the fields and Bob Kojetin said he thought that was what they intended. Joan Lonsbury commented that the athletic association registration fees are already fairly high and to add another $5 would be out of line. John Keprios stated that most other communities do not at this time charge an additional fee for playing on the fields. He further mentioned that every association now has a scholarship fund set up because there are some who cannot afford the registration fees now. Bill Lord MADE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND TO COUNCIL THAT THE PARK BOARD OBJECTS TO THE REDUCTION OF PARK MAINTENANCE FUNDS BY $31,000 AND BELIEVE IT UNJUST TO TRY TO COVER THAT DECREASE THROUGH AN INCREASE IN YOUTH FEES AND WOULD LIKE THE CITY COUNCIL TO RECONSIDER THE CUT. Don Wineberg SECONDED THE MOTION. Discussion on the motion pertained to the adult fees being increased. The board agreed that was not pertinent to the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Bob Kojetin stated that the council had recommended a 10% fee increase on all fees charged by the Park and Recreation Department, except the Art Center fees which will be considered by the Art Center Board at their next meeting. Mr. Kojetin distributed a sheet with the recommended fees and charges (copy "B" attached). Marilyn Wooldridge MADE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND TO THE COUNCIL THAT THE FEES AND CHARGES AS PRESENTED FOR 1987 BE APPROVED. Motion was seconded. MOTION CARRIED. III. GARDEN COUNCIL Bob Kojetin reported that since the last meeting in June when the Park Board directed the Historical Society to take a look at Arneson Acres for a probable site there have been several meetings with the Edina Garden Council. The Garden Council was asked if they would be willing to look at sharing the site with the Historical Society. Phyllis Kenaston reviewed several documents (copies "C" attached) which had been given to Park Board members prior to the meeting, including a brief history, results of a survey of Garden Council members and a recommendation to the Park Board to approve of a master plan for Arneson Acres. Mrs. Kenaston highlighted some of the volunteer services which the various garden clubs have performed for the community. Mrs. Kenaston stated that the Garden Council is willing to contribute financially to have a Master Plan made and is willing to assist in any way they can to help implement such a plan. The Garden Council needs were outlined by Mrs. Kenaston and include the following: 2 At the Arneson House: A meeting room for A serving area for A library space 100 people coffee and refreshments Adequate storage (flower show properties, etc.) At the Greenhouse A better heating system (replacing warming house heater now in use) Insulation A new floor Remove present walls between main room and storage areas George Warner inquired if a Master Plan was done previously. Mr. Kojetin replied that only the perennial flower garden area designed by Mort Arneson had been done, and that the Garden Council is now asking for a Master Plan of the other 15 acres as well as for the buildings. Mrs. Kenaston stated that the Garden Council would like to have a master plan drawn so that each year or every few years some phase of the plan could be completed in the total development of the park. Joan Lonsbury said she had always thought that Arneson Park was to remain a passive park and that there would not be any active sports in it. Bob Kojetin indicated that was correct. Don Wineberg MADE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND THAT A MASTER PLAN BE DEVELOPED TO ENCOMPASS ALL THREE AREAS AS OUTLINED IN THE GARDEN COUNCIL'S RECOMMEN- DATION WHICH WILL INCLUDE THE ARNESON HOUSE, THE GREENHOUSE AND THE ACREAGE WITHIN THE PARK, WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT IMMEDIATE NEEDS SUCH AS HEATER, INSULATION AND FLOORING IN THE GREENHOUSE BE ATTENDED TO AS SOON AS NECESSARY AND NOT DELAYED UNTIL COMPLETE MASTER PLAN IS DONE. Jim Fee SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED. Bev Harris, the President of the Garden Council reported on the results of a survey done within the membership and the results of that survey indicated that 77% were in favor of choice b)sharing the Arneson _house with another group. The remaining 23% were split fairly evenly for the choices of: a) exclusive use of the house by the Garden Council and; c) neither of the other two choices. Mrs. Harris commented further that the general consensus was that the house should not be unoccupied because of -the danger of vandalism to an empty house. Don Wineberg asked if there would be individuals giving input for a Master Plan to whoever will be doing the Master Plan. Joan Lonsbury said there will be a committee appointed to work with the staff and professional people doing the plan. Joan thanked the Edina Garden Council for their contributions to the City for the past years. 3 IV. RECREATION REPORT John Keprios reported on the current Park and Recreation activities which include adult volleyball and upcoming events which include adult bandy, a new 4 -man hockey league, adult broomball. Hockey registration and youth basketball have registered also for the upcoming season. Mr. Keprios announced that Ed MacHolda has been working on plans for a Halloween party for children. Mr. MacHolda gave more details on the party which will be held at the Community Center on October 31, from 2 - 4 p.m. for children in grades 1 -3. The Halloween party is a joint effort of Edina Park and Recreation Department and the Kid's Club and is open to the first 400 who pick up free tickets. John Keprios stated that resurfacing of four tennis courts has been completed; Van Valkenburg Park has been vandalized and is being closely watched; new equipment has been ordered for Normandale and Wooddale and should arrive in about two weeks; Arden Park received a new picnic table which was one -half funded by neighborhood people. Bob Kojetin mentioned adult soccer is now underway at the Edina Golf Dome. V. OTHER Joan Lonsbury announced a special Park Board meeting to be held on Thursday, October 30th to discuss the Historical Society issue and also possibly to meet with the athletic association presidents. Joan also announced that since the second Tuesday of November is on Veterans Day, the November Park Board meeting will be on November 18th and it will be held at 6:30 p.m. at Braemar Golf Course main room. A special presentation will be made on the topic of" Networking Between Park Boards ", which was one of the topics presented at the Minnesota Recreation and Park Association state meeting in Duluth. It was decided to send a letter of thanks to Wally Irwin for his generous donation of a press box at the Braemar soccer /football field. The soccer association and football association purchased a large scoreboard for the fields and it is operated from within the press box which Mr. Irwin constructed. Joan Lonsbury referred to an article in the Edina Sun which told of the Hockey Moms collecting hockey equipment and sending it to the iron range and it was decided to send a letter of appreciation to the Hockey Moms for those actions. A thank you letter to the Park Board from the Edina Gymnastics Association was read for use of the Weber Building and assistance from the Park Board; also thank you letters from the Colonial Church and the Edina Community Lutheran Church to Bob Kojetin for his recent talk at a Ministerial Association meeting. Bill Lord made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Don Wineberg seconded the motion. Meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. 91 ITEMS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL: Bill Lord MADE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND TO COUNCIL THAT THE PARK BOARD OBJECTS TO THE REDUCTION OF PARK MAINTENANCE FUNDS BY $31,000 AND BELIEVE IT UNJUST TO TRY TO COVER THAT DECREASE THROUGH AN INCREASE IN YOUTH FEES AND WOULD LIKE THE CITY COUNCIL TO RECONSIDER THE CUT. Don Wineberg SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED. Marilyn Wooldridge MADE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND TO THE COUNCIL THAT THE FEES AND CHARGES AS PRESENTED FOR 1987 BE APPROVED. Motion was seconded. MOTION CARRIED. Don Wineberg MADE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND THAT A MASTER PLAN BE DEVELOPED TO ENCOMPASS ALL THREE AREAS AS OUTLINED IN THE GARDEN COUNCIL'S RECOMMENDATION WHICH WILL INCLUDE THE ARNESON HOUSE, THE GREENHOUSE AND THE ACREAGE WITHIN THE PARK, WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT IMMEDIATE NEEDS SUCH AS HEATER, INSULATION AND FLOORING IN THE GREENHOUSE BE ATTENDED TO AS SOON AS NECESSARY AND NOT DELAYED UNTIL COMPLETE MASTER PLAN IS DONE. Jim Fee SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED. 5 r " T 11 � Cf ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION FEES COLLECTED BY ASSOCIATIONS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION EDINA BASEBALL ASSOCIATION (Legion Surcharge) (Sr. Babe Ruth Surcharge) (Mickey Mantle Surcharge) EDINA FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION AGE /GRADE 9 -10 yr. olds 11 -13 yr. olds 14 -18 yr. olds 16 -18 yr olds 16 -18 yr. olds 16 yr. olds 4th -8th Grades 1st -2nd Grades EDINA YOUTH SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION (E.Y.S.A.) Slow Pitch 3rd -12th Grade Fast Pitch 7th -12th Grade EDINA SOCCER ASSOCIATION TOTAL 1986 Fee PARTICIP. $ 35 40 45 40 25 18 35 693 X $5 = $3,465 521 x $5 =$ 2,605 312 x $5 =$ 1,560 House league 1st -12th Grade 27 Traveling league - 1,551 x $5 = $7,755 EDINA GIRLS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION (E.G.A.A.) Flag Football 5th -12th Gr. 22 161 x $5 =$ 805 Team Tennis 7th -12th Grade 18 75 x $5 =$ 375 Volleyball 5th -12th Gr. 18 Basketball 4th -12th Gr. 32 Traveling Team Basketball 6th -8th Grade 50 Fall Basketball Clinic 15 Summer Basketball Clinic 3rd -4th Grade 12.50 5th -7th Grade 15.00 7th -9th Grade 25.00 0 ADULT SPORTS Adult Softball (slow - pitch) Regular season Baseball (Edina "Scots" Town Team) Bandy Co -Rec Broomball Adult Volleyball Adult Basketball Adult Hockey - 4 man team new program EDINA BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION House After School EDINA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION Mites Squirts Pee Wees Bantams Midgets Juveniles Jr. B's Required Traveling Team Surcharee Squirts Squirts Pee-Wees Pee Wees Pee Wees Bantams Bantams Bantams Midgets Midgets Juveniles 3rd -8th Grades 1st -2nd Grades 7 -8 yr. olds 9 -10 yr. olds 11 -12 yr. olds 13 -14 yr. olds 15 -16 yr. olds 17 -18 yr. olds A team B team A team B team B2 team A team B team B2 team A team B team City Hockey School Traveling Hockey School Goalie Shooting School& Defensemen School Skating. Techniques School 175 /team 225 - 250 /team 250 /team 35 /team 235 /team 35 /team Total 50 40 30 55 105 105 105 105 105 105 75 65 115 80 35 120 85 35 140 105 105 50 -60 70 -80 55 45 -55 135 x $75= $10,125 $26,690 I EDINA SWIM CLUB HIGH SCHOOL Memberships 1/2 year club member Patch and Free Style Time Pro's Time EDINA GYMNASTICS ASSOCIATION 1 (Sept.- March) Swimmers 1 FULL SEASON BOYS Stroke $ 42 137 White 140 166 Green 210 $127 Gold 245 148 Senior 333 200 Swim meet 1 per splash 272 *$24 goes directly to MN. swimming (insurance) BRAEMAR CITY OF LAKES FIGURE SKATING CLUB Memberships 1/2 year club member Patch and Free Style Time Pro's Time EDINA GYMNASTICS ASSOCIATION 1 hour per week $ 78 1 1/2 hour per week 107 2 hours per week 137 2 1/2 hour per week 166 3 hours per week 193 3 1/2 hours per week 222 4 hours per week 249 4 1/2 hours per week 272 5 hours per week 294 EDINA WRESTLING ASSOCIATION 10/14/86 GIRLS $140 163 220 nA" .:B" EDINA PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT FEES AND CHARGES /OTHER THAN BY ORDINANCE Park and Recreation 1987 1986 1985 Playground $ 7.00 $ 6.00 $ 6.00 Dramatics and Theatre 20.00 18.00 17.00 T Ball 20.00 18.00 17.00 - Tennis Instruction 20.00 18.00 17.00 Art Center Memberships: Family $ 38.00 35.00 32.00 Individual 28.00 25.00 20.00 Class Fees: (8 weeks) Adult Members $ 60.00 48.00 48.00 Adult Non - members 66.00 56.00 56.00 Child Member 40.00 32.00 32.00 Child Non - Members 44.00 38.00 38.00 Art Center Rental $ 30.00 /group Arena Single Hour Rate As of September $ 80.00 70.00 70.00 Contract Rate (10 or more hours) 75.00 67.50 67.50 Late Night - midnight or later 60.00 55.00 50.00 Open Skating 2.25 2.25 2.25 Skate Rental 1.06 1.06 1.06 Skate Sharpen 1.50 1.50 1.50 Summer Rental Pavilion: 500 /day Season Tickets (Eff. 10/1/87) Resident Family $ 52.00 52.00 50.00 Resident Individual 32.00 32.00 30.00 Non Resident Family - 62.00 62.00 60.00 Non Resident Individual 37.00 37.00 35.00 Classes (as of January 1.1987) 40.00 35.00 35.00 Gun Range Pistol 1/2 hour $ 4.00 3.75 3.75 25 rounds trap_ 4.50 4.00 4.00 Building - per hour 45.00 40.00 40.00 Pool Season Tickets: Resident Family $ 44.00 40.00 37.00 Resident Individual 28.00 25.00 22.00 Non - resident Family 50.00 45.00 42.00 Non - resident Individual 33.00 30.00 27.00 Daily Admission: Adult $ 2.75 $ 2.50 $ 2.50 Youth 2.25 2.00 2.00 Aquatic Instruction $ 20.00 18.00 $ 17.00 RENTALS Braemar Ballfields: $35 /hr - no lights $55 /hr - with lights General Park Areas: $50 /hr - commercial use (i.e..TV Commercials) Picnic Shelters: $35 up to 50 people $65 over 50 people (Lake Cornelia Park ) Showmobile: $550 /day Rental of Athletic Field: $30 /game $50 /game with lights Portable Bleachers: $100 /day or $50 /hr. + Delivery Charge. Recreational Picnic Equipment - free usage Tupa Park $125 /day 10/14%86 V • C THE EDINA GARDEN COU`tCIL The Edina Garden Council is a member of the National Council of State Garden Clubs and The Federated Garden Clubs of (Minnesota The E.G.C. was formed in 1953 with 18 neighborhood clubs in the Village of Edina. Now the E.G.C. has nine (9) garden clubs with a total of 142, active - paid memberships in the City of Edina. Our Concerns are: A. 1Iorticn1ture B. 'hvironment C. Education / Scholarships D. Flower Shows and Design E. Conservation r Horticulture - Green rouse The major part of our horticultural activities is centered at the Edina Green (louse located in Arneson acres. Yearly our members give in kind 575 hours of volunteer work. We grow 11,500 plants each year and with these plants: 1. Members ;plant seven (7) city gardens 2. City plants thirty eight (38) gardens (This includes all gardens at Braemar) 3. Borders planted by parking ramp facing 51st. St. 4. This does not include three new gardens recently created at 5th and :dooddale corner 5. Formal garden at Arneson Acres is planted with annuals from the Green ilouse ;F Horticulture - Yearly rlant Sale 1. I- Ionies from the Plant sale is used to a. Pur'th4se seed, soil etc. for the next year b. Buy two concrete garden benches for Arneson Formal Center Garden c. Give the Edina Library a sum of money to purchase books on Gardening ,F_ Design i 2. The Plant Sale has generated much good will for our community - quality plants at reasonable prices. Home Grown; Other gardeners have heard of our quality and ccme to buy. October 14, 1986 M Page -2- Edina Barden Council Environment - Recycling Center and Conservation The present Recycling Center of Edina is a sD inoff from interested garden club members �,Iio wanted to establish a collection point for recycable material. (1970) With others in the community, we have continued our interest .-ithseveral members serving on the present ::ecycling Con - nission established by the City of Edina. (1974) State and :National objectives of the Federated Garden Clubs on Birds, 3utterflies, 'Dater, Arboretum, Operation :ildflower, Zooloical Gardens are also a part of our program. Education / Scholarships For fifteen years, E.G. C. has given : %a student scholar- ship to a student in Forest Service or Horticulture at the University of 11n. or Vocational Schools (20).00) Flower Shows and Design /Garden Tours Every year !se s--onsor either a Flower Show or Garden Tour. Some years tie do both a show and a tour. Some shows are done by invitation, especially at times of celebration. (Southdale's 30 Years, Expo, Edina's Cenntenial Year). Edina Garden Council has earned a fine reputation for quality flower show and is especially proud of the fine reputation of our members who are accrediated flower shwa judges. We are also proud of our flower arrant,ers who par- ticipate in State Fair Flower Shows, Art in Blooear l-Iols Institute of Art, Aquatennial Flower Show, Arboretum Flower Shows, :come Shows, winning many blue ribbons and repre- senting Edina. N:ot to mention our own show; Special -- Once a month during the summer, garden clubs visit Veterans Hospital. tie take our own garden flowers and make arrangements for every table in the dining* rooms. Some clubs have brought tray favors and room brighteners. October 14, 1986 Edina Garden Council For the Edina Park and Recreation Board 2;eetincr October 14, 1986 The Edina Garden Council recommends that a Master Plan for the Arnes<,n :'acres Garden and Park be drawn. ve suggest that the Park and Recreation Board make such a recommendation on behalf of the Arneson Park to the City Council. The Edina Garden Council is willing to contribiite financially to such a plan and help in any way that cae may be able to implement sl!ch a plan. The Edina Garden Council needs at Arneson '.louse A meeting roan for 100 people A serving area for coffee and refreshments A library space Adequate storage (flower show properties, etc.) The Edina Garden Council needs at the Greenhouse A better heating system (replacing warning house heater now in use) Insulation A new floor Remove present walls between main room and storage areas WHY DCES THE EDINA GARDE(' CCUP!CIL TAKE A PROPRIETARY ATTITUDE TOWARD THE ARNESON HCUSE AND PROPERTY? The following quotes come from the [-torten Arneson dedication of Arneson Acres held on Thursday, July 15, 1976. Mayor Van Valkenburn excerpt "It is a tribute to Morton that he has continued to not only make this gift, but to work with the Garden Clubs in desioning and planning this for their use." Mrs. Phvllis Kenaston (Garden Council President) Mort, this evening it is a pleasure to be here. With this oarden as a beck - ground and with all your friends from Edina gathered, we want to say a word to you as part of our onocing friendship. We've looked to you as a friend and a counselor and advisor. We of the Edina Garden Council have treasured this association in the past. We look forward, however, to a continued association. Your generosity and your vision for the things that you can see for Edina in expanding your property and developing it; we share this dream and this vision and we hope we can be a part of it. But we hope further that you will always continue to have this interest and this sharino. Therefore, on behalf Of the Edina Garden Council, we accept the trust that you have shared and we hope that we can be everything that you want us to be and that we can carry forward some of these thinos. On behalf, then, of all of our friends gathered, we thank you. Gocd evening. Mcrton Arneson excerpt °I believe this is the first time it has ever happened in this country; that a community has given 15 acres of ground and a home where members of the garden club can take over and use as they please." The following quote comes from a letter written by Warren C. Hyde, Edina City Manager to his. Barbara Flanagan, Minneapolis Star and Tribune on July 7, 1976 Warren C. Hvde excerpt "It is his *hope and the City's intention to have the home even- tually used by Edina's twelve garden clubs as a headquarters and the grounds to be used for plantings by the various clubs. " * Morton Arneson Complete texts from ohich the above quotes are taken are available from the Edina Garden Council Chairman Beverly Harris C • ,L C -for all �lC�► -►er5 Prepared for discussion at Hidden Valley Garden Club's Meeting August 14, 1986 Vi �.c.c1Z'.Ci 8% lc�u IjESP,GG Q r Jc5 by irIe �crej+ e-� �. I . SPACE CCt rh e et o g �.�- � l e, ril a.n 5 � n ' �o . Coa l -Would allow us to develop the Garden Center concept. The purpose of which is to educate the public, ourselves included. A. The Center could contain reference books, magazines, photographs,--scrapbooks, etc. and be contiguous to meeting area or not. B. The Center could feature: 1. Display of seed catalogs 2. Display books or magazines featuring table settings with additional segment or functional table setting with decorative unit (flowers, shells, etc., etc.) 3. Vegetable displays a) "How to grow a good tomato" Problems identified and examples shown 4. Study on grasses 5. Weed display and identification 6. Tree identification chart on the Arneson Park grounds (see clipping) 7. Common tree diseases identified and examples shown Resource: Diarge Larson, Garden Center Chairman 8. Possibilities unlimited II. SPACE FOR Presenting speakers and specialists in programs and the opportunity for social occassions and meetings A. Flower Designers - flower-arranging 1. Instructions - 2. Demonstrations 3. Symposiums 4. Workshops - hands on B. Flower Shows 1. Small 2. Special Societies a) Iris b) Rose c) Begonia, etc. -2- 1 3. Season or Occastion, Kinds a) Christmas, etc. b) Tables for Two - table settings c) Period arrangements (Victorian, etc) •d) Vignettes e) Tray show f) il���Y "Your Hang Ups" ' C. Grow To Show - P�Horticulture a) Conservation b) Environmental issues D. Garden Club Meetings - Council Meetings Many of these functions can generate some funds for the E.G.C. if our space meets their needs and if the group is not a member of the E.G.C. III. SPACES Grounds and Formal Garden, Greenhouse, Other Gardens A. Garden Brochure C 1. Small (mini) history of the Arenson Garden 2. Write up a season tour schedule - hours open to public, guided tours, etc., etc. Print and distribute to appropriate groups and organizations 3. Description and location of other gardens-of interest and concern to us o Jan Epple Memorial Garden at E.A.C. (Past President, E.G.C.) ' • The Taylor Memorial Garden on Taylor Knolls (E.A. C.) - LIn memory of Gordy Taylor'amnemr. Shirley# .,member of Cloverlane G.C.) • Our plantings - list locations. B. Tours 1. Member gardens on tour 'aiso included with park gardens and ask for donation a nominal amount. (Serve tea /coffee on upper terrace (optional). Members as well as non - members. 2. On a special occassion have a garden sculpture showing, garden furniture, gazeboes in and /or near the formal garden. Dress appropriately for the aesthics! This could be the highlights of a.tour C. Move ahead with the larger plan for developing Arneson Acres by commissioning a study and rendition master design plan (' by a Certified Landscape Designer. i D. Greenhouse 1. Plant Sale -3- C a) Suggest two additions. Promote a planteb icomplete container and plant material). Ask E.A.C. Pottery department to give us a good price (in a pottery container (x number), we plant and sell. Could have Edina logo - Centennial year is coming b) Serving coffee and doughnuts up on the terrace does attract (charge) - perhaps some other small items could be sold up there too (bird feeders, etc. etc. designer flags, etc. (see attached) IV. SPACES - MEMBERSHIPS & PATRON SUPPORT A. An aggressive drive for new members. New - comers, etc. and rededication of present members in a growing and creative gardening agenda o "Hands -on" gardening in the greenhouse emphasized o Scheduling convenient meetingstimes for young working women - Saturdays and evenings o Convenience of using the terrace room at the house (takes care of some hostesses' pressure) Suggest we officially name it The Terrace Room to identify the downstairs area at Arneson home. o Membership fee for Edina Clubs — consider raising membership fee, keeping the additional amount in the E.G.C. treasury. o Patron membership setup previleges - receive brochure, invitations to special events, previews . o Adapt and display at the Greenhouse a special flag with a flora and /or fauna motif (see A Flag Raising Tradition - Pg. 81 Better Homes & Gardens Decorating, Spring, 1986. Could a member design and execute for us. This could be very helpful in identifying the E.G.C. as an active organization in the community. r 00 p _ — �, . � a a.cic� i Y}'l -� �u•S �' o t,t.U' 'pro qrws -tt. • y —i vVV � � kFk. �1ao � �D. ►mil a, *_ d eweJ v P Comment= Made b•:: Member- on = :;;Ur-ve. iii: = C "There is a deep emotional need to be recognized as the recipient of the Arneson House." "Prefer status quo with someone living in the House for security reasons - empty house is invitation to vandals." Take over downstairs of House only if enlarged and improved (bathrooms, coffee area, larger room) - expansion into garage." "We (garden club) should have control of who or what goes into the House - the right to say "yes" or "no"." "Build onto greenhouse (seat 100 or more persons). Better heating, etc..." " We should put our time into beautifying the city and learning - not into the care and support of the House." " Historical Society upstairs - allowed to expand to North and East of House (front and side). Each organization having separate, well defined areas and rules." "Took 8 years to develop greenhouse - need time to develop learning center." "Definitely need to know more to vote intelligently (cost of sharing or not, becoming revenue facility, improvements...) ". I 1 M E M 0 DATE: October 14, 1986 TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: David A. Velde, City Sanitarian kW SUBJECT: 1987 Public Health Nursing Contract On September 16, 1985, the Edina City Council awarded the public health nursing services contract to the Bloomington Division of Public Health for calendar years 1986 and 1987. On April 25, 1986, the contract for calendar year 1986 was amended to provide services for low income women and children through a Maternal and Child Health grant funded through the Minnesota Department of Health. The 1986 contract was increased by $5,000 and the City of Edina received $11,260 in grant funds. For 1987 the City of Edina will receive $11,710 in Maternal and Child Health grant funds. Of this, $5,200 will be used to pro- vide the additional services through the _contract with the Blooming- ton Division of Public Health. The remaining $6,510 will be used to offset the'costs included in the 1987 contract. The City of Edina will receive $99,001 in subsidy and grant funds from the Minnesota Department of Health in 1987. At this time, it would be appropriate to amend the September 16, 1985 City Council action by increasing the contract amount by $5,200 which will bring the 1987 Public Health Nursing Services contract to $91,700. Upon Council approval I will prepare the necessary contract documents. -v_-u ,I MEMORANDUM TO: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK /JM� SUBJECT: CANVASS - CITY ELECTION u DATE: OCTOBER 17, 1986 Minnesota Statute 205.185 states: "Within two days after an election, the governing body shall canvass the returns and declare the results of the election." I would recommend that the Council meet at 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, November 6 to confirm the vote canvass and declare the results of the election. This should only require a brief meeting. [i M E M O R AN D U M TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT - HENNEPIN COUNTY W. 66TH ST.: YORK AVE. (EDINA) TO SHERIDAN AVENUE (RICHFIELD DATE: October 17, 1986 Hennepin County is currently in the process of bidding a project involving West 66th Street from York Avenue to Sheridan Avenue. Earlier this year, Edina City Council gave final plan approval to the project. Hennepin County's project is estimated at $942,848.15. The County is requesting that we enter into a construction cooperative agreement with Edina, participating at an estimated $25,573.85 share. Staff would recommend approving the agreement, with the funding source being the State Aid Fund. Ninety per cent of the estimated share would be paid in 1987 with the balance paid on completion of the job. Additionally, a resolution is needed to authorize the Mayor and Manager to sign the agreement. FH /sw D RQAT TTT T ONT WHEREAS, Agreement for participation in the construction of County State Aid Highway No. 53 (also known as West 66th Street), between York Avenue South and Sheridan Avenue South, Hennepin County Project No. 8056, Agreement No. PW 13 -11 -86 has been prepared and presented to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: That said Agreement be in all things approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Mayor and Manager are authorized to sign Agreement No. 13- 11 -86, Hennepin County Project No. 8056. ADOPTED this 20th day of October, 1986. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 20, 1986, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 28th day of October, 1986. City Clerk rl -�3 September 8, 1986 TO: Members of the City Council FROM: * Peggy Kelly I have a growing concern that as we consider decisions involving the use of our remaining undeveloped land and decisions involving redevelopment, we may be in increasing conflict with our Mission Statement which essentially states that our primary objective is to foster and enhance Edina's original..concept of a single family community and to protect existing housing and our residential neighborhoods. Consider the following statistics: . 90% of our housing stock is in place . Edina currently has 12,700 single family homes ._Edina currently has 7,600 multi - family units . From 1970 to 1980, while the population remained stable, total single family housing units in Edina, decreased as a percentage of all housing units from 83% to 62 %. Apartments and town houses more than doubled from 15% to 35% of the total housing units. . The average rental unit pays $600 /mo. rent. Couple the above statistics with the fact that 24% of our population is over 65 (the highest in the first ring suburbs); only 32% of our population has school age children and the Met Council estimates that only 25% of our housing stock is affordable for first time home buyers and it becomes clear that our focus should be on plans and methods to increase our affordable single family housing stock and I to increase the opportunities for young families to locate in Edina. I believe it is fair to say that the majority of vacant land available for new housing development will be under pressure for multi - family development and in most cases, will encroach on single family neighbor- hoods. Most will be luxury developments of increasing density. Is this the direction we want to take? Why should we encourage more expensive multi - family housing rather than innovative programs for single family housing? The pressure for more density in housing not only To: Members of the City Council Page 2 causes conflict with existing neighborhoods, but it burdens our city infrastructure - roads, sewers, drainage - which was designed for a single family environment. I am suggesting that the balance has shifted away from our primary objective of enhancement of our single family community and that we have more than enough multi - family housing to provide housing choices for Edina citizens. The strength of Edina has been its strong sense of community provided by its permanent residents. I would like to recommend that we undertake a re- assessment of our mission and comprehensive plan as it relates to housing and develop specific programs to encourage single family housing development and re- development. Perhaps it will begin with a workshop or symposium on housing. There are many innovative programs (such as our Edinborough mortgage subsidy program) which could be considered and a number of experts in the Twin Cities who could be helpful to us. In summary, we should establish a positive Council direction to: Preserve and enhance our single family community and neighborhood. Examine methods for creating additional single family housing. . Make our housing more affordable for young families. Be innovative and direct our growth rather than constantly reacting. 9 �TB M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: RESIDENTIAL DENSITIES DATE: October 17, 1986 Attached are copies of City Council minutes and a land -use plan amendment from 1975 -1976 concerning a reduction of residential densities. Council Member Richards asked that we provide this information for review in connection with Council Member Kelly's memorandum. KR /sw Attachment CLARIFICATION OF ALLOWED MULTI - FAMILY DENSITIES IN THE SOUTH, SOUTHWEST, AND WESTERN EDINA PLAN AREAS 1. All multi - family developments with more than two units per structure shall be zoned Planned Residenti4l District rather than R -3, R -4, or R -5. 2. The density of any parcel or tract of land shall be no greater than identified by the comprehensive plan governing that tract or parcel. 3. The maximum allowed density governing any tract or parcel of land in the South, southwest, and Western Edina Plan areas shall be reduced cumulatively (up to 500) by the following identified percentages if the following identified situations are applicable: A. B. C. D. IF THE PARCEL OR TRACT: THEN REDUCE DENSITY BY THIS PERCENT Is between 1500 feet and 3000 feet from an accessible freeway interchange Is greater than 3000 feet from an accessible freeway interchange NOTE: The distance from a freeway interchange shall be measured from the center of the overpass of the interchange along the centerline of the principal existing or proposed street or streets to the nearest point of property adjacent to'the principal street. In cases of a partial interchange, the distance shall be halved. Is within 200 feet of an existing and developed R -1 or PRD -1 subdivision (nearest point to nearest point) Contains land below a high water mark.identified by the City E. Contains land designated as floodplain in Edina Ordinance No. 815 or defined as wetlands of Type 3, 4, or 5 by U.S.F.W.S. Circular 39 100 100% for that portion affected 50%-for that portion affected F. Contains land within 100 feet of a 10 -acre water - body or of a creek but not in the floodplain or wetlands of Type 3, 4, or 5 as defined by U.S.F.W.S. Circular 39. 25% for that portion affected G. Has slopes of: 6 to -12% inclusive \ 25% for that portion affected over 12 to 18% inclusive 50% for that portion affected over 18% 75% for that portion affected 4. This clarification is effective, and will be applied to the condition of the land, as of August 4, 1975. Any grading to increase or decrease topographic, wetland, or floodplain conditions after August 4, 1975, will not effect the. calculations of reduction. F .• affected Mr. Luce clarified that any grading to increase or decrease topographic, wetland or floodplain conditions after the passage of this plan will not affect the calcu- lations of reduction. The distance from a freeway interchange shall be measured from the center of the overpass of the interchange along the centerline of the principal existing or proposed street or streets to the nearest point of property adjacent to the principal street. In cases of a partial interchange, the dis- tance shall be halved. Under the formula, units per acre for the Lowry Hill property located on the Southwest corner of Dewey'Hill and Cahill Roads would be reduced by 45 %, the Hansen property North of Vernon Avenue would be reduced by 15% and the Hansen property South of Vernon .Avenue would be reduced by 35%. Although under the formula Krahl Hill would be reduced by 65%, the 50% maximum reduction clause of the proposal would apply to this property. In response to questions of the Council, Mr. Luce explained that the original densities were based on existing traffic plans and sewer and water systems. He explained that he believed that some areas could handle greater densities and that it would be arbitrary to reduce densities across the board or to the current minimum density range figure. Mr. Erickson opined that the Council would be in a stronger position, if there should be arguments over the application of the formula, if —µ the amendment is duly adopted in public hearing's before the Planning Commission and the Council, as each plan wan originally adopted. In response to a question of Councilman Richards, llr. Erickson recalled that a "plan" simply specifics that certain densities are desirable for a given area. lie said that Council could act to amend its zoning; ordinance to cut down density. ranges or establish a greater number of classifications into which property could be rezoned. Mr'. Luce said that he would prepare a list of existing major tracts of land which would indicate maximum densities permitted at the present time, along with densities permitted under the proposed guidelines. C0U%CILM.'LN RICHARDS' MOTION that the plan presented by 'Mr. Luce be adopted as policy to take effect immediately, that the Planning Commission be requested to hold a public hearing on densities in the South, Western and Southwestern Edina Plans at its next meeting, and that Council hold a public hearing on the densities of all three plans on September 8, 1975, was seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried. Council also directed that, although not legally required, mailed notices be sent to all affected pro- perty owners and neighborhood associations along with published and posted notices. HEARING DATE SET FOR A:!E` MIE \'r OF PLA::S. Mr. Luce reviewed a plan which had been requested by Council and had been reviewed by the Planning Commission which would reduce permitted multi - family densities in the Southwest and Western Edina Plan r areas for properties which are five acres or greater. Under the plan, all proposed multi- family developments with more than two units per structure would be zoned j Planned Residential Development, rather than R -3, R -4 or R -5, the density of any G parcel or tract of land shall be' no greater than identified by the comprehensive plan governing that tract or parcel, and the maximum allowed density governing any tract or parcel of land in the Southwest and Western Edina Plan areas shall j W be reduced cumulatively (up to 50 %) by.the following identified percentages if the following identified situations are applicable: THEN reduce density IF the parcel or tract: by this percent A. Is between 1500 feet and 3000 feet from an accessible freeway interchange 5% f B. Is greater than 3000 feet from an access- ible freeway interchange 10Z C. Is within 200 feet of an existing and developed R -1 or PRD -1 subdivision (nearest point to nearest point 10% D. Contains land below an established high 100% for that portion water mark affected E. Contains land designated floodplain or wetlands of Type.3 or higher (as defined by 50% for that-portion U.S.F.W.S. Circular 39) affected' -. F. Contains land within a 100 foot perimeter of a 10 -acre waterbody or of a creek but not in the floodplain or wetlands of Type 3 or higher (as defined by U.S.F.W.S. 25% for that portion Circular 39) affected G. Has slopes of: 6 -12% 25% for that portion affected ' 12 -18% 502 for that portion affected �. 18 +% 75% for that portion affected Mr. Luce clarified that any grading to increase or decrease topographic, wetland or floodplain conditions after the passage of this plan will not affect the calcu- lations of reduction. The distance from a freeway interchange shall be measured from the center of the overpass of the interchange along the centerline of the principal existing or proposed street or streets to the nearest point of property adjacent to the principal street. In cases of a partial interchange, the dis- tance shall be halved. Under the formula, units per acre for the Lowry Hill property located on the Southwest corner of Dewey'Hill and Cahill Roads would be reduced by 45 %, the Hansen property North of Vernon Avenue would be reduced by 15% and the Hansen property South of Vernon .Avenue would be reduced by 35%. Although under the formula Krahl Hill would be reduced by 65%, the 50% maximum reduction clause of the proposal would apply to this property. In response to questions of the Council, Mr. Luce explained that the original densities were based on existing traffic plans and sewer and water systems. He explained that he believed that some areas could handle greater densities and that it would be arbitrary to reduce densities across the board or to the current minimum density range figure. Mr. Erickson opined that the Council would be in a stronger position, if there should be arguments over the application of the formula, if —µ the amendment is duly adopted in public hearing's before the Planning Commission and the Council, as each plan wan originally adopted. In response to a question of Councilman Richards, llr. Erickson recalled that a "plan" simply specifics that certain densities are desirable for a given area. lie said that Council could act to amend its zoning; ordinance to cut down density. ranges or establish a greater number of classifications into which property could be rezoned. Mr'. Luce said that he would prepare a list of existing major tracts of land which would indicate maximum densities permitted at the present time, along with densities permitted under the proposed guidelines. C0U%CILM.'LN RICHARDS' MOTION that the plan presented by 'Mr. Luce be adopted as policy to take effect immediately, that the Planning Commission be requested to hold a public hearing on densities in the South, Western and Southwestern Edina Plans at its next meeting, and that Council hold a public hearing on the densities of all three plans on September 8, 1975, was seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried. Council also directed that, although not legally required, mailed notices be sent to all affected pro- perty owners and neighborhood associations along with published and posted notices. -1 11. PUBLIC HF.ARP:G on Clarification of Allowed Densities in the South, Southwest, Q ' and Western Edina Plan Arras. � I ,J P(i, Mr. Luce recalled that at the 7 -30-75 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission recommended the Council approve a formula for reducing the allowed multi- family densities in comprehensively planned areas of Edina, prepared by the staff at the Council's direction and in response to discussion held at the 7 -2 -75 Planning Commission meeting. The Planning Comnission.indicated, however, that that formula should not apply to the South Edina Plan because that plan already contains extensiv- traffic and land use controls and the land in that plan area has no significant environmental characteristics. Mr. Luce indicated that at their last meeting the City Council asked that the Planning Commission hold a public hearing pursuant to �- -state statutes to formally amend the comprehensive plans, including the south Edina 1 Plan, to reflect that density clarification. Mr. Luce presented and read the proposed staff formula for reducing densities which provides that: all multiple family developments with more than two units per 7 structure shall be zoned PRD; the density of any parcel shall not be greater than that allowed by the comprehensive plan; and the maximum allowed density shall be reduced cumulatively up to 50% according to certain measurable site characteristics such as the percentage of slopes, the proximity to an accessible freeway interchange and residential areas, and the amount of land below an established high water mark or within or in proximity to a flood plain or wetland. He noted this formula would not affect land which is already zoned. Mr. Luce stated that letters were received from Mr. John Hedberg of Hedberg . and Sons and from Mr. Bill Howard, spokesman of the Southwest Edina Homeowners Association, in response to the notice of public hearing mailed to the affected homeowner's associations and to the owners of property of .5 acres or more. .Mr. Hedberg asked that the South Edina Plan be excluded from this clarification, and %Lr. Howard indicated he is in favor of the proposal and that he, too, had contacted the other homeowner's associations as well as the residents in his neighborhood. Emphasizing that the deductions illustrated are purely estimates and are by no means factual, Mr. Luce reviewed a chart identifying the affect of the prcposed density formula on four sites chosen for.illustrative purposes. He noted that a pending law suit was brought by Karl Krahl and the Gittleman Corporation against the City of Edina, and the plaintiffs have requested an injunction prohibiting Council action on the proposed density clarification. e Mr. Rick Davies (5412 Malibu Drive), representing the Parkwood Knolls/ Malibu Heights Homeowners Association, and Mrs. Dick Seaberg, representing the i Viking Hills Homeowners Association, stated they support the adoption of the staff formula for reducing densities. Mr. Bill- Howard (5808 Dewey Hill Road) , spokesman for the southwest Edina Homeowners Association, agreed, adding that he believes the prospects for reducing traffic in Southwest Edina will be greatly enhanced if the proposed density clarification is approved and the comprehensive plans amended. FM Discussion followed. In reply to Mr. H: G. Haglund, Mr. Luce indicated he I•... could not guarantee a reduction in taxes if the proposed density clarification is iadopted and the comprehensive plans are amended; however, any change in market value would be reflected by the City Assessor and may adjust the taxes. ' Mr. William Dale stated he has owned a 1/3 interest in the "Lowry Rill" property for 15 years. He recalled that "about two years ago we had a sale for ithe property in which a developer was going to build a three and four story wood frame building with the appropriate number of units on it but it would cover quite 1 a bit of ground. That was passed by the Council but the money crunch came in and the developer wasn't able to go ahead on it. Now we have a developer who wants to develop it at the allowed number of units in the plan, but in place of four istories wants to build five stories of concrete and steel; it would cover 24 percent of the land but the rest would be open space." He stated he has been payinc taxes on the property for 15 years. "Now the City wants to cut the density in half and the value is determined by the density allowed. I don't agree with this at all and I am protesting this action." i Mr. Harvey Hansen stated that he purchased a small parcel of land immediately, adjacent to the Braemar Oaks apartments based on the density allowed in the South- west Edina Plan and based on his experience with Braemar Oaks. He commented "for the record" that someone in a similar position may eventually cost the city a great deal of money in legal fees. Mr. Hughes, Mr. Lewis, and Mr. Runyan stated they are in favor of the proposev density clarification. Mr. Hughes and Mr. Lewis noted that the Planning Commission has been urging developers to reduce density for years. Mr. Runyan noted he support the proposal because it responds to the wishes of a great many residents of Edina.- Mr. Hughes moved the Planning Commission recommend the amendment of the Western Edina Plan and Southwest Edina Plan to incorporate the proposed density clarification formula, and, further, that the Planning Commission reconunend tho South Edina Plan not he amended because traffic and land use controls are already an integral part of that plan. Mr. Runyan seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried. of Notice were presented by Clerk, a>>ruveLi as to Lurm anu uto owners of land with It was clarified that notices of this meeting had been sent to ow tracts of five acres or larger and to chairmen of all homeowners' associations which were affected by the proposed modification. Mr. Erickson referred to a restraining order served on the City which enjoins the City from the adoption of i a plan which will affect the density of the Karl Krahl property (located gener- erally North of the Crosstown Highway and South of Vernon Avenue) pending deter - mination of the issues. He said that the restraining order affects only that property. but since the Krahl property is included in the total plan, the Council should take no action on the plan at this time. Mr. Luce recalled that Council had instructed the Planning Commission to consider the amendment of the comprehensive plans of South, Southwest and Western Edina, but that the Planning Commission had recommended that no modification be made in the South Edina Plan at this time. Mr. Luce advised that under the proposed modification, develop - went would have'to take place as a PRD zoning, rather than as R -3, R -4 or R -5, I that the density of any parcel or tract in this area could be no greater than that which is identified by the Comprehensive Plan and that in each plan density would be reduced cumulatively up to 50% by the following percentages if the following situations are applicable: A. B. • C. CO� O 00 D. co W W . E. I' F. IF the parcel or tract: Is between 1500 feet and 3000 feet from an accessible freeway interchange Is greater than 3000 feet from an accessible freeway interchange Is within 200 feet of an existing and developing R -1 or PRD -1 subdivision (Near- est point to nearest point) Contains land below an established high water mark Contains land designated floodplain or wetlands of Type 3 or higher (as defined by U.S.F.W.S. Circular 39) Contains land within a 100 foot perimeter of a 10 -acre waterbody or of a creek but not in the floodplain or wetlands of Type 3 or higher (as defined by U.S.F.W.S. Circular 39) THEN reduce density by this percent: 5Z 10Z 10% 100% for that portion affected .50% for that portion affected 25% for that portion affected G. Has slopes of: 6-12% 25Z for that portion affected 12 -18% ?:50% for that portion affected •18 +Z 752 for that portion affected Mr. Luce clarified that adoption of the above recommendation would result in an average reduction of density from 11 units per acre to approximately 8 units per acre. He explained that property zoned R -3, R -4 and R -5 before 1971 would be excluded from such restrictions. Mr. Rick Davies, spokesperson for Parkwood Knolls - Malibu Heights Residents' Association, spoke in support of the reduction of densities recommended by the staff and by the Planning Commission. Councilman Richards said that some people are of the opinion that the proposed modification does not go far enough and encouraged Mr. Davies to make additional requests for - density reduction. Mrs. William Scott, 6613 Southcrest Drive, expressed concern that the South Edina Plan is not proposed to be modified. Mr. Robert Hansen, owner of property on the South side of Krahl Hill, questioned the fact that, once the road is built on his property, the only property remaining would be on the hill and under severe restrictions. Mr. Luce told Mr. Hansen that his property would probably be allowed six units per acre under the proposed modifications. Mr. W. H. Howard, speaking for the Southwest Edina Homeowners Association, said that his group feels that they would support the modification as being a fair compromise to everyone concerned. Mr. Richard Seaberg, President of the Viking Hills Homeowners' Association, said for the record that "to maintain the high quality of Edina landscape, to protect what remains of the natural environment and to minimize the potential increase in both traffic and fire hazards that could result from increased density, we whole- heartedly, we agressively, we enthusiastically, and we joyously recommend as a minimal the adoption of the proposed density guidelines "', Mrs. Alison Fuhr, 6609 Brittany Road, questioned the 0 - 12 density, the water table and the wet- lands, but said that she thinks that it is a commendable plan overall and that she wholeheartedly supported the reduced densities. Mr.,Luce responded by sayinf that established criteria had been used in making the recommendations and that many houses built below the water table. He said that consideration of the water table should be more the concern of the developer and that if the water table is to be considered at this point, it should also be pursued for all structures. A representative of Lowry Hill Enterprises objected to the modifi- cations, saying that they are trying to construct quality housing and have made ♦hnlr n1nn- in comoll.•ince with the density requirements of the Southwest Edina Plan. A resident of Dewey Hill Road and Mrs. Charlotte Burns, 5820 Dewey Hill Road, expressed concern about existing densities and a proposed five story build- ing. Mrs. Helen McClelland of Continental Drive, asked how Western Edina density spreads could be further reduced. Mrs. Ann Overholt, 7 Overholt Pass, supported the proposal as a "first step" toward reducing densities. Reference was made to . a letter from Mr. John W. lledberg of Hedberg & Sons, requesting that the South Edina Plan be deleted from the proposed clarification of permitted multi- family densities in Edina. In response to a question of Councilman Richards, City Attorney Erickson said that he believed that if the plan is applicable at all, it should be applicable for all properties. covered and that he would not recommend that any action be taken at the present time on properties other than the Krahl property. As recommended by Mayor Van Valkenburg, Councilman Courtney's motion continuing the matter until September 15, 1975, so that. the Council will have an opportunity to read the restraining order, was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt and carried. V_ - HEDBERG & SONS Co..- 1 3725 WEST 76TH STREET • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55435 Edina City Council - page 2 August 28, 1975 f( Office & Main Plant: $314040 Hopkins Gravel Plant: 545 -4400 tel: August 28, 1975 purports to control land use and density !hereof by reference to traffic trip generation criteria in a far 1 more comprehensive tray than the proposedV "clarification of allowed multi - family densities ". There is therefore Edina City Council no need for the "clarification" ordinance as related to I South Edina. The South and °_dira Edina Plan further sets forth i a commuter trail between hest 70th and viest 76th h Planning Commission ,1601 3est 50th Street Streets ( which is set up as a possible strip for transit facilities in clra, "inresota 55424 r the area to handle the traffic which nay be penarated ; from existing commercial developments and future non -resi- dential and residential develop rent in that _.r.tlemen: Re: Clarification of allowed multi - urea. family densities in Edina 3. This last year sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer lines Our company owns property in the vicinity of 76th and France Avenue '. were recently installed in York Avenue and 7lest 76t, Street. !+ These facilities viere sized to South, which is in the area ]clown as the South Edina Plan. Under more than accomo�4ate the � density and uses which are permitted the South Edina Plan, which was adopted in 1973, the development of under the South cdina I Plan. Vie and other property owners will be special our property and the allowable densities therein, whether f or com- i pcaying assessments for these utility services based p morcial, industrial, or residential use are to be controlled by r. tie capacity to serve the densities and land uses permitted by the South traffic generation criteria. Both the planning commission and the Edina Plan. council jade an extensive review of the factors involved in the de- velopment of the vacant property in Southeast Edina, and in particular­: the included 4. Under the South Edina Plan there is proposed aperoy1mately property in what is called the "exception. area ". Based 11 acres of park land and commuter trail to be established on the type of development occurring in the surroundir.,r area, they concluded that the "exception in the "exception area ". In addition, there are recent developmont of the area" should not be tied down to definite land uses, but ) proposals by the City Council to increase further the amount of land in rather vritn certaln specific ezceotions the area could be developed for non- residential i park the Southeast Edina area. The existance of � considerable open or resi- dential purposes with the density of such developments to be controlled' space and park land is another reason for a not lowering the density of the development. b7 traffic �_eneration standards set forth in the report. These traffic' contrcls are in accordance with the findings of the consulting firm For the reasons I have set forth above, it would be of Daniel, I4ann, Johnson, & I.Iendenhall (Df,iJi:I). my request that the South Edina Plan be deleted from the proposed clarification of allowed multi - family densities in Edina. Since Southeast Edina is considerably different than other vacant properties in Edina, it is my strong feeling that the proposed re- r Please incorporate this letter as part of the record of the duction of alloyed multi - family densities should not in an way apply y y y public hearing to be held by the Planning Com•ission on September ..'' to the South Edina Plan, and in particular the. Southeast Edina area. ea 3, 1975 and the City Council on September 8, 1975. y ".y reasons for this opinion are as follows: 1. The environmental factors such as nearness to existing R1 Yours truly, developments, or presence of wetlands, flood plains or natural, HEDBERG & SOPIS CO. hills, valleys and slopes have no application to Southeast Edina. The land lying within that area is either the site of an existing sand and gravel mining operation or has had sand and Lravel removed in the past. John Vr. Iiedberg 2. Aside from environmental factors questions of traffic cc: Greg Luce appenr to be the other concern as evidenced by the specifying specifying Edina City Planning Dept. of a tract or parcel's distance from an accessible freeway - interchange. As pointed out above, the South Edina Plan CONCRETE PRODUCTS a A0 Tented �IPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT GIVEN FINAL APPROVAL. Affidavits of Notice were pre- by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Luce recalled that, following preliminary approval by the Council, the Comprehensive Plan Amendment had been approved by the Metropolitan Council and is now before the City Council for final approval. Mr. Luce reviewed the clarification of allowed multi- family densities in the South, Southwest and Western Edina Plan Areas which pro- vided that all multi - family developments with more than two units per structure shall be zoned Planned Residential District, rather than R -3, R -4, or R -5, that the density of any parcel or tract of land shall be no greater than identified by the comprehensive plan governing that tract or parcel and explained that maximum allowed density governing any tract or parcel of land in each Plan area shall be reduced cumulatively (up to 50 %) by certain identified percentages and certain identified situations. Mr. John Hedberg, representing Hedberg & Sons Company, protested that the Planning Commission had recommended that the South Edina Plan be deleted from the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. He referred to a letter dated August 28, 1975 which he had sent to the Council and to the Planning Commission. This letter had pointed out that Southeast Edina is considerably different than other vacant properties in Edina and, therefore, the proposed reduction of allowed multi- family densities should not apply to the South Edina Plan, and particularly to the Southeast area for the following reasons: 1) that there are no environmental concerns in the area; 2) that land use and density are controlled by reference to traffic trip generation criteria and that the South Edina Plan sets forth a commuter trail between W. 70th and W. 76th Streets which is set up as a possible strip for transit facilities in the area to handle the traffic which may be generated from existing commercial developments and future non- residential and residential development in that area; 3) that sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer lines were sized to accomodate the density and uses which are permitted under the South Edina Plan; and 4) that there is considerable open space and park land in the area. In reply to a-questi()i; of Mr. Hedberg, Mr. Hyde ,pointed out that the location of the parks will be determined as the area develops. Mr. Dunn pointed out that some of the utilities proposed for the area were cut back upon Mr. Hedberg's request and added that if the size of the utility pipes were reduced, the cost reduction would be minimal. Mr. Melvin Getrs.Al was told that the- reduction-in density would not apply to Krahl Hill. Mrs. Alison Fuhr, 6609 Brittany Road, objected that any structure should be constructed on an 18% slope. Mr. Robert Hanson, owner of property on the Crosstown Highway and Gleason Road, was told that the Plan amendment would not reduce his presently pro- posed density. Mr. Marsh Everson, 6710 Cahill Road, said that he had purchased four acres of land on Cahill Road on the basis of its R -3 zoning. Following lengthy discussion, Councilman Shaw offered the following resolution approving the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT BE IT RESOLVED that the Comprehensive Plan for the South, Southwest and Western Edina Plan areas be amended as follows: 1. All multi - family developments with more than two units per structure shall be zoned Planned Residential District rather than R -3, R -4 or R -5. 2. The density of any parcel or tract of land shall be no greater than identified by the comprehensive plan governing that tract or parcel. 3. The maximum allowed density governing any tract or parcel of land in the South, Southwest, and Western Edina Plait areas shall be reduced cumulatively (up to 50%) by the following identified percentages if the following identified situations are applicable: 6 Cc—, i 5/3/76 L� r IF T111`1 PARCEL OR TRACT: A. Is between 1500 feet and 3000 feet from an accessible freeway interchange B. Is greater than 3000 feet from an accessible freeway interchange NOTE: The distance from a freeway interchange shall be measured from the center of the overpass of the interchange along the center - line of the principal existing or proposed street or streets to the nearest point of property adjacent to the principal street. In cases of a partial interchange, the distance shall be halved. C. Is within 200 feet of -an existing and developed R -1 or PRD -1 subdivision (nearest point to nearest point) D. Contains land below a high water mark identified by the City E. Contains land designated as floodplain in Edina Ordinance No. 815 or defined as wetlands of Type 3, 4, or 5 by U.S.F.W.S. Circular 39 F. Contains land within 100 feet..of -a -10 -acre water- - body or of a creek but not`in the floodplain or - THEN REDUCE DENSITY BY THIS P1:RCENT 5% 10% 10% 1007. for that portion affected 50% for that portion affected wetlands of Type 3, 4 or 5 as defined by U.S.F.W.S. 25% for that portion Circular 39 -- -" affected G. Has slopes of: _6 to 12% inclusive 25% for that portion - - affected over 12 to 18% inclusive -50% for that portion affected over 18% _- = 7 7 75% for that portion - affected 4. This clarification-is effective, and will be applied -to the condition of the land as of August 4, 1975. _.Any grading to increase or decrease.topographic, wet- land, or floodplain conditions after August 4, 1975, will not affect the calcula -.. tions of reduction. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Courtney. Rollcall: - Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw, Van - Valkenburg Nays: None - - - Resolution adopted. 1986,E OF EDINA I CHECK NO. DATE CHECK STER 10- 20 -866GE 1 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO- INV- • P -O- • MESSACE , - 1 2 , 270415 10/10/86 8,044.50 MED CENTER HOSP PREM CITY 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL , 3 8,044.50 • A a i••!is •ss –CKS ; ' 275354 10/10/66 211.14 MINNEGASCO HEATING 10- 4254- 446 -44 a MANUAL e 275354 10/10/86 136.38 MINNEGASCO HEATING 10- 4254 - 520 -52 MANUAL 9 275354 10/.1.0/86 407_27 MINNEGASCO HEATING 10- 4254 - 540 -54 MANUAL 275354 10/10/86 3.91 MINNEGASCO HEATING 10- 4254- 629 -62 MANUAL " 275354 10/10/86 189.66 MINNEGASCO HEATING 10 -4254- 646 -64 MANUAL 12 27_5354 1.0/10/86 22_93 MINNEGASCO HEATING 23- 4254_611 -61 MANUAL ^� 275354 10/10/86 3,289.09 MINNEGASCO HEATING 26 -4254- 689 -68 MANUAL 275354 10/10/86 221.68 MINNEGASCO HEATING 27-4254- 661 -66 MANUAL 15 275354 10/10./86 MINNEGASCO HEATING 27- 4254 - 662 -66 6 275354 10%10/86 _44.79 2,109.18 ___ MINNEGASCO HEATING 26- 4254 - 708 -70 _MANUAL-- MANUAL 275354 10/10/86 96.31 MINNEGASCO HEATING 40- 4254 - 801 -80 MANUAL ' 275354 1_0/10/86 590.71 MINNEGASCO HEATING 40 –_ 4254 - 803 -80 MANUALi 275354 10%10%86 22.46 MINNEGASCO HEATING 50- 4254 - 821 -82 MANUAL 2a 275354 10/10/86 13.95 MINNEGASCO HEATING 50 -4254- 841 -84 MANUAL 21 275354 1 0/10/86 55 _79. –i—,4 MINNEGA8CO HEATING 50- 4254 - 862_86 MANUAL- 2' 23 17.25 r .MANUAL-- _ . 2" 3ry 2•' ssssss _ i' 4_s__•_ -CKS_ , -� 25 26 276174 10/10/86 158,000.00 1ST 8 D= BANK TRANSFER 50 -1010- 000 -00 MANUAL Z7_ _ 2 76174 10/10/86 158,000.00- 1ST 8 D BANK TRANSFER 50 -1010- 000 -00 MANUAL- __._;� :6 .00 • 3a +tii ++ •s* –CKS JI 32 276251 10/10/66 60,000.00 EDINA HRA DUE FROM HRA 10 -1145- 000 -00 MANUAL 33 60,000.00 • n 3A "a •+• –CKS ^ 37 1276430 10/10/86 20,768.37 PERA EMP PORTION 10- 4145 - 510 -51 a MANUAL in 39 20, 768.37 • "' 41 + ++ –CKS 1 a2 276523 10/10/86 10,162_42 SOCIAL SECURITY CITY PORTION 10- 4149 - 510 -51 MANUAL 10,162.42 • Ae -- –_ —. strss� •rs –CKS 6�J -_ A' 1 276700 10/10/86 160.00 D 0 E R CITY PORTION 10 -4162- 510 -51 MANUAL e3 46 160.00 • eA 49 ssssss __ G] 60 sss –CKS la, ' 280055 10/10/86 275.00 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27 -3230- 000 -00 fio MANUAL _ 6D 53 280055 10/10/86 15.00 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27 -3800- 000 -00 MANUAL '° 34 280055 10/10/86 54.01– BRAEMAR GOLF CORRECTION 27- 4120 - 662 -66 MANUAL �2 35 280055 10/10/86 84.01 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27 -4120- 663 -66 MANUAL '3 36 280055 10/10/66 54.01 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27-4120- 663 -66 MANUAL 7nl a, 9 4 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -20 -86 PAGE 2 ,.J _ _CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO_INV. • P.O. 0 MESSAGE 13,092.71 280391 _- _ _ - 280055 10/10/86 57.75 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27 -4120- 664 -66 MANUAL 10/10/86_ 21151.18 _ 280055- _10/10/86 _ _- 70.13 BRAEMAR .GOLF PETTY CASH_ _27- 4120 - 671. -66 MANUAL______,-,_ 280391 10/10/86 280055 10/10/86 190.00 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27 -4200- 661 -66 MANUAL 291.52 280391 10/10/86 10/10/86 56.44 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27- 4226 - 660 -66 MANUAL ,I:J 2,855.09 �280055 280055 10/10/86 37.53 - BRAEMAR -GOLF _ 10/10/86 PETTY CASH 27- 4504_660 -66 81525.12 9 10/10/86 - 280055 10/10/86 79.00 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27- 4516 - 660 -66 - _MANUAL- MANUAL 485.26 - -1 _280391 "'1 -- - 280055 10/10/86 35.88 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27 -4620- 661 -66 MANUAL ----.MANUAL MANUAL ^� 280055 10/10/86 - -- - 24.99 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27 -4624- 664 -66 MANUAL.__ I„ __ » NORTHERN 925.73 ELECTRIC 27- 4252 - 662 -66 -MANUAL-- MANUAL NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 28- 4252 - 708 -70 MANUAL. NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 29-4252 - 721 -72 sss -CKB _ ELECTRIC 280391 10/10/86 747.72 280391 10/10/86 945.94 - 280391 10/10/86 - -- 13,092.71 280391 10/10/86 10,601.49 1 280391 10/10/86 2,653.66 280391 10/10/86 201.52 280391 10/10/86 120.83 280391 10/10/86_ 21151.18 280391 -_ -- 10/10/86 392.37 280391 10/10/86 43.32 280391 10/10/86_ 1,403.87 280391 10/10/86 1,374.77 280391 10/10/86 800.50 280391 10/10/86 1,771.39 280391 -- 1010/86 - -- 291.52 280391 10/10/86 882.61 NORTHERN 10/10/86 2,032.27 _280391 280391 10/10/86 227.36 280391 10/10/86 2,855.09 28039110/10/86 MANUAL 218.35 280391 _ 10/10/86 2,653.63 10 -4252- 520 -52 10/10/86 81525.12 �280391 280391 10/10/86 17.49 - l 280391 10/10/86 660.63 280391 10/10/86 11055.29 10- 4252 - 629 -62 10/10/86 485.26 - -1 _280391 "'1 -- - - 56,205.69 srssrr NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 1130- 000 -00 MANUAL �s.. NORTHERN STATES _ ELECTR I C 10-4252-301-30 __ MANUAL NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10 -4252- 321 -30 __ _ - MANUAL NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 322 -30 MANUAL I_ NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10 -4252- 330 -30 MANUAL__: NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10 -4252- 345 -30 MANUAL NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10 -4252- 358 -30 MANUAL NORTHERN STATES 10- 4252 - 375 -30 MANUAL �� NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10 -4252- 440 -44 MANUAL NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 460 -46 MANUAL NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10 -4252- 520 -52 MANUAL NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10 -4252- 540 -54 MANUAL NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 629 -62 MANUAL NORTHERN STATES _ ELECTRIC 10 -4252- 646 -64 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 23- 4252- 611 -61 ----.MANUAL MANUAL ^� NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 26 -4252- 689 -66 MANUAL „�• NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 27 -4252- 661 -66 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 27- 4252 - 662 -66 -MANUAL-- MANUAL NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 28- 4252 - 708 -70 MANUAL. NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 29-4252 - 721 -72 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 40 -4252- 801 -80 ____MANUAL - MANUAL NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 40 -4252- 803 -80 MANUAL NORTHERN_STATES ELECTRIC 40 -4252- 804 -80 MANUAL NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 50- 4252- 821 -82 MANUAL NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 50- 4252 - 841 -84 MANUAL NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 50 =4252- 861 -86 MANUAL 'I_ - - - -- - - -- -- sss- CKB 280701 10/10/86 21000.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 10 -4290- 510 -51 MANUAL I4 - 280701 - 10/10/86 39.00 - -- -- _ POSTMASTER POSTAGE 10 -4290- 510 -51 MANUAL I- - -- - - -- - - -- 2,039.00 i rssrrs ,282251 10/10/86 220,000.00 EDINA HRA DUE HRA 220.000.00 s sssssr ss+ -CKS 10- 1145 - 000 -00 MANUAL 32.65 ALBINSON BLUE PRINTING 10- 4570- 260 -26 337683 32.65 s sss -CKS 19$6 1 OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT ° 293005 1 10/09/86 3 37.25 A ,— .293004 10/10/86 50- 4214 - 862 -86 ° 293004 10/09/86 84.28 �e 95.78 • ' r# #ss# • 293005 10/09/86 37.25 I; 2 1 CHECK STER 10- 20 -St4GE 3 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV, •P. P.O. #MESSAGE l AMERICAN LINEN — LAUNDRY AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 27- 4262 - 661 -66 al ,I ' 293008 10/13/86 70.55 KAMAN BEARING 6 SPLY GEN SUPPIIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 j'° 70.55 • 1#swwsw ••• -CKS I� -293013 1.0/14/86 133__56 ALTERNATOR_ REBUILD- GEN - SUPPLIES 10- 4504.420 -42 1139 12 293013 10/13/86 114.11 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 1132 2' 293013 10/14/86 67.70 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 57645 �_ 29301.3 — __10/13/86 138.80 REBUILD PARTS 10= 4540 - 560_56 5841_64 22 - 454.17 • I i l # # # #:# _ - -- - --- - ---- ••• -CKS 293015 10/15/86 106.58 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 10 -4256- 510 -51 C, __- 29301.6 1.0/15/86 - _52.34 AT 3 T_INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE __- _ -_ -_- 12 V - 158.92 • swssss ••• -CKS 2 293018 10/15/86 11010.10 AT d T INFO SYSTEM 232 10- 1010- 000 -00 A_ - -_ 293018 10/15/86 1 , 01.0. 10 - AT_d T- INFO _SYSTEM — 232 10-1010-000-00 293018 10/15/86 17.40 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 10 -4256- 510 -51 17.40 • rii -CKS I_ ° . 293025 _10/14/86_ 2840 ALFONS ANDERSSON CONT SERV 27- 4200 - 661 -66 28.00 • 293026 10/13/86 4,.373.40 BADGER METER INC WATER _METERS 40- 1.220_000 -00 _ l^ 293026 10/09/86 197.19 BADGER METER INC REPAIR PARATS 40- 4540 - 807 -80 460069 293026 10/13/86 219.04 BADGER METER INC REPAIR PARTAS 40- 4540 - 807 -80 459404 293026 1,0/13/86 __43_10__ BADGER METER INC- _- _REPAIR PARTAS_ 40= 4540_907_80 4,832.73 - - -• - - - -- - -- -- - �: n •ssw ## ••• -CKS 293028 10/09/86 1,655.10 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTORY 27- 4630- 664 -66 s 293028 10/09/86 1_,743.95 BEER - WHOLESALERS — INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 822 -82_ 293028 10/09/86 3,553.20 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 842 -84 293028 10/09/86 2,430.90 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 862 -86 ; '° 9,383.15 • °S J: Sc • # ## ## ••• -CKS , e AUDIO GROUP A ADVERTISING 5 50 -4214- 822 -82 ° 293005 1 10/09/86 3 37.25 A AUDIO GROUP A ADVERTISING 5 50- 4214 - 862 -86 ,o 74.50 • r# #ss# • I; 2 1 e 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -20 -86 PAGE 4 CHECK N0. i- DATE AMOUNT VENDOR - - ITEM DESCRIPTION_ - - ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. • MESSAGE - - . 293031 10/15/86 73.50 BERTELSON BROS INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 120 -12 293031 10/14/86 133.41 BERTELSON BROS INC _ GEN SUPP 10- 4504 - 160 -16 293031 10/14/86 24.36 BERTELSON BROS INC GEN SUPP 10- 4504 - 510 -51 293031 10/15/86 73.50 - BERTELSON BROS INC DRAFTING SUPPLY 10- 4506 - 133 -12 304.77 + - - - - - sss * ** - -- - - - - -- -- * ** -CKS 293033 10/09/86 134.90 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626- 822 -82 293033 10/10/86 357.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING 50- 4626 - 842 -84__ 293033 10/10/86 237.20 ___INVENTORY BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY _ 50- 4626 - 862 -86 729.60 + 293034 10/14/86 20.95 BLOOMINGTON CHRY -PLY REPAIR PARTS _ 10- 4540 - 560 -56 60039 20.95 + - *** -CKS i 293037 10/15/86 644.25 BRAUN ENG TESTING IN CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 264 -04 644.25 * _ -_ 293038 10/15/86 - 100.00 GEORGE BUTLER - - POLICE SERVICSE 10- 4100- 420 -42 100.00 * - - -- 293039 10/09/86 263.59 BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC FILL MATERIALS 10- 4508 - 343 -30 263.59 * - i rsssss +++ -CKS 293041 10/09/86 3,325.93 BURY 6 CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 10 -4524- 301 -30 293041 10/09/86 3,034.20 BURY d CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 645 -64 6,360.13 r -" " srs *ss -- *00-CKS 293047 10/13/86 35.30 BROWN PHOTO ADVERTISING 23 -4214- 610 -61 461342 35.30 293048 10/09/86 154.38 BRISSMAN KENNEDY INC GEN SUPP 10- 4504 - 520 -52 50133 154.38 + 293049 10/09/86 825.15 BURESH ROBERT CONF 10 -4202- 440 -44 825.15 * ss *s *s +++ -CKS 293053 10/13/86 141.39 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 10- 4250 - 301 -30 293053 10/13/86 51.49 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 10- 4250- 446 -44 293053 10/13/86 65.33 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 10 -4250- 520 -52 293053 10/13/86 141.39 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION - - 10 -4250- 540 -54 293053 10/13/86 83.74 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 10- 4250- 628 -62 293053 - _____10/13/86 A 55.28 BROWNING FERRIS_____ REFUSE COLLECTION 10 -4250- 646 -64 293053 10/13/86 121.62 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 10- 4250 - 646 -64 _ _ 293053 10/13/86 12.86 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 23 -4250- 611 -61 1986 If OF EDINA CHECK STER 10 -20 -81 GE 5 293054 CHECK NO. DATE___. -_ -- AMOUNT VEND OR__ -_,__ T,_ 1= 293053 10/13/86 70.07 BROWNING FERRIS I' 2930S3____10/13/86 _ — _ _ 10 — BROWNING FERRIS COLLECTION 293053 10/13/86 126.56 BROWNING FERRIS COLLECTION 293053 10/13/86 126.60- BROWNING FERRIS 59532 293053- 10/13/86_ 126.50 BROWNING_FERRIS- 10 =4620- 560 -56 60059 293053 10/13/86 58.50 BROWNING FERRIS ni293053 10/13/86 133.34 BROWNING FERRIS __._293053 10/13/86 259.01 _. BROWNING. FERRIS_ 130.00- 293053 10/13/86 271.63 BROWNING FERRIS 10/13/86 195.00- THERMAL CO 1,592.21 r 28- 4248 - 107 -70 A3527S 293054 10/14/86 293054 10/14/86 293054 - - -- 10/14/86 -- 293054 10/14/86 �'] 293054 10/14/86 "L_ 293054 I 10/14/86 27- 4250 - 661 -66 = rrrrer 293058 I,o ITEM_ DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT -NO .INV_i P,O. -0 MESSAGE REFUSE COLLECTION 26- 4250- 689 -68 ADDITION _ 27- 4250- 661 -66 REFUSE COLLECTION 27- 4250 - 661 -66 CORRECTION 27- 4250 - 661 -66 REFUSE__COLLECTION 59590 27- 4250 - 661 -66 REFUSE COLLECTION 27- 4250- 662 -66 REFUSE COLLECTION 28- 4250 - 706 -70 REFUSE,_ COLLECTION 50- 4250 - 841 -84 REFUSE COLLECTION 50 -4250- 861 -86 94.28 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 58598 93.60 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 59590 - -- _235.26, - -__ BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR_ PARTS 1 0- 4540 - 560 -56 56871 71.38 BATTERY WAREHOUSE PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 59174 128.10 BATTERY WAREHOUSE PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 59532 39_90^ BATTERY WAREHOUSE PARTS � 10 =4620- 560 -56 60059 662.52 • ----- - -- - -- 10/15/86 100.00 WAYNE BENNETT r POLICE SERVICSE 10- 4100 - 420 -42 r I.„ rrr -CKS rrsssr rrr -CKS 293060 10/14/86 122.64 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 664 -66 293060 10/09/86 214.42 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 664 -66 _- 293060 10/09/86 177, -99_ AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 664 -66 I. 515.05 - -- ssssss 293064 10/13/86 432.50 THERMAL CO CONT REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 707 -70 H91972 I. -I 293064 10/13/86 130.00- _THERMAL_ CO CREDIT 293064 10/13/86 195.00- THERMAL CO CREDIT 28- 4248 - 107 -70 A3527S 293064 10/15/86 300.71 THERMAL CO CONT REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 707 -70 N92289 _,-_ 29306410/13/86448.24-- THERMAL-CO — __CONT REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 707 -70 H91843 293064 10/13/86 255.95 THERMAL CO CONT REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 707 -70 H91753 1,11e.40 • . I; Fl 293065 - - -- - -- - 10/10/86 CONT SERV 10- 4200 - 482 -48 10.50 CULLI6AN ---- -- 293065 10/10/66 9.00 CULLIGAN CONT ERV 10 -4200- 646 -64 093261 -- - - 19_50 • -�`_. -- ssrsrs rrt -CKS 293072 10/14/86 65.12 DAILY CONST REPORTS ADVERTISING 10 -4210- 140 -14 — - - - -i "' 65.12 r �" 293073__­____i -0/'0-4/84 121.25` CITY BEER INVENTORY — -. - 50- 4630 - 8 . 22 -82 - --.— - _ - - - 293073 10/09/86 148.10 CITY BEER INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 842 -84 __293073 10/09/_86 94_25 363.60 CITY SEER INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86 293366 10%09/86 166.95 MINNESOTA " BAR INVENTORY 50 -4632- 822 -82 �" ]4 - 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -20 -86 PAGE 6 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. • MESSAGE *** —CKS 293078 10/13/86 217.90 COCA COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822 -82 293078 10/09/86 612.10 _COCA COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50- 4632- 842- 84._ 293078 10/14/86 828.50 COCA COLA BOTTLING _____________50-4632-862-66 INVENTORY -__ _ 1,658.50 + sss * ** * ** —CKS 293080 10/14/86 279.78 CONT—MINN GEN SUPPLIES 27- 4504- 661 -66 293080 10/14/86 107.23 CONT —MILAN __ __ CLEAN SUPPLIES _ 27 -4512- 661 -66 293080 10/14/86 1,808.30 CONT —MINN CONCESIONS 27- 4624- 664 -66 2,195.31 + trss *s *ss —CKS 293082 10/10/86 9.50 CONWAY FIRE 6 SAFETY EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274- 440 -44 86197 9.50 • *** —CKS 293087 10/10/86 53.26 CURTIN MATH SCI GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 293087 10/15/86 126.23 CURTIN MATH SCI GEN SUPPLIES _ 10- 4504 - 482 -48 293087 10/10/86 106.94 CURTIN MATH SCI GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 293087 10/10/86 60.96 CURTIN MATH SCI GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 347.39 s st *t ** + ++ —CKS 293094 10/13/86 59.00 CASH REGISTER SALES EQUIP MAINT 27- 4274 - 661 -66 59.00 • 293095 10/14/86 405.96 COMMISSIONER REVENUE GASOLINE 10- 4612- 560 -56 405.96 t ssssss * +* —CKS 293099 10/09/86 51.70 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO REPAIR -PARTS 27 -4540- 662 -66 24050 293099 10/09/86 23.90 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 662 -66 24118 75.60 ssss:: *** —CKS 293106 10/15/86 100.00 DAHL— MR HILDING POLICE SERVICSE 10- 4100 - 420 -42 I 100.00 + *ss ** ts* —CKS 293110 10/09/86 285.75 DAVIDSEN DIST INC INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84 285.75 + ttst ** is _ +++ —CKS °, 293125 10/14/86 17.80 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPP 10- 4504 - 390 -30 15324 erirsr i I -- - -- -- - -' --- -- -- - -- _ _____ _ _ $00-CKS 293148 10/14/86 114.87 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 301 -30 - - -- 114.87 s swiss � L2 93150 10/10/86 23.43 ELECTRONIC CENTER ----REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 330 -30 411437 ea- 93150 10/15/86 3.61 ELECTRONIC CENTER REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 93150 10/15/86 - - 27.78 • - - - -- .- - - - - -- �.:I sss -CKS 293162 10/09/86 23.74 FOWLER ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 23.74 10- 4540 - 646 -64 58532- I71 J - - -.- s _ ]) l] - -- - - -- '° sss -CKS ri 1986 OF EDINA CHECK 'STER 1 10 -20 -8 %GE 7 CHEL_ _DA_TE _ AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO_ INV. _f_.P.O P.O. i_ MESSAGE. _ 293125 10/10/86 10/14/86 72.10 437.25 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 628 -62 15340 _ _ _ ._- 527.15 ,s _- _MERIT- SUPPLY . - ___ -___ _ __PARTS — -- 10 -462- 560 - 561 -5294 293126 293126 10/09/86____ 10/09%86 84.00 DAVIS__EUGENE_ _SERVICES 60- 4100 - 985 -90 25.83 DAVIS EUGENE MILEAGE 60 -4208- 985 -90 __ _ - �� 109.83 • I'° rssiss - ---- -' - - - -- -- - - -- -- ess -CKS 293131 10/IS/86 _ - 148.15 ASPLUND COFFEE_— CONCESSIONS 28 -4624- 704 -70 03803 148.15 s - -- - ��' ' � 293134 10/09/86 36.75 CITYWIDE SERVICES CONT REPAIRS 50 -4248- 841 -84 sss -CKS __ - - -- 36.75 s — - - sss -CKS 293136 293136 10/13/86 10/13/86 75.00 65.10 EARL F ANDERSEN 5IGNS 6 POSTS --- 10- 4542 - 328 -30 EARL F ANDERSEN SIGNS POSTS 10- 4542 - 328 -30 - ---- - - - --- 140.10 I : -i ssiisi ----- - - -. -- sss -CKS 293143 293143 10/09/66 10/09/86 j'06 - -___kMRICH BAKING Co - - CONCESSIONS 2T -4624- 664 -66 159.23 EMRICH BAKING CO CONCESSIONS 27- 4624- 664 -66 j -- -- .---- - - --'- _ —_ 175.29 s -- sss -CKS 293146 293146 10/14/86 10/10/86 - 4,730.00 409.60 - ----- GREEN - ACRES SPKL -" - - -_ . . CONSTRUCTION 10 -1458- 000 -00 60617 293146___ -- 10/10/86 452.97- GREEN ACRES SPKL GREEN ACRES SPKL CONSTRUCTION 10 -1458- 000 -00 � 5,592.57 s CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 642 -64 erirsr i I -- - -- -- - -' --- -- -- - -- _ _____ _ _ $00-CKS 293148 10/14/86 114.87 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 301 -30 - - -- 114.87 s swiss � L2 93150 10/10/86 23.43 ELECTRONIC CENTER ----REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 330 -30 411437 ea- 93150 10/15/86 3.61 ELECTRONIC CENTER REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 93150 10/15/86 - - 27.78 • - - - -- .- - - - - -- �.:I sss -CKS 293162 10/09/86 23.74 FOWLER ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 23.74 10- 4540 - 646 -64 58532- I71 J - - -.- s _ ]) l] - -- - - -- '° sss -CKS ri 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 293183 293183 293183 293183 » » » »s» 293185 »s »s »» 293188 293188 293188 10/10/86 107.50 10/10/86 80.00 10/13/86 1,085.50 10/09/86 1,020.00 • GOLF . 1,317.75 + CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS REPAIR PARATS BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS REPAIR PARTS BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS PARTS BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS GEN SUPPLY__ _ _ 10 -20 -66 PAGE 8 _ _ _ACCOUNT NO_ INV. • P.O. 0 MESSAGE 10- 4540 - 520 -52 66899 10- 4540 - 520 -52 67075 27- 4620- 661 -66 28-4504-708-7067474 10/13/86 11020.00 GOODIN CO CONT REPAIRS 28 -4248- 707 -70 380007 10/14/86 1,020.00 • GOLF CAR MIDWEST 10/10/86 154.00 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 212963 10/10/86 163.56 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 198476 10/10/86 43.12 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO REPAIR PARTS - - - 10 -4540- 540 -54 210667 293203 360.68 • - PETTY CASH 293203 293194 10/09/86 99.40 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS 293194 10/10/86 74.50 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS 293194 10/14/86 15.39 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS EQUIP MAINT 10 -4274- 420 -42 69193 RADIO SERV _ 10- 4294 - 440 -44 68903 RADIO SERV 10- 4294- 440 -44 69406 REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 671 -66 CORRECTION PARKING PARKING PARK 6 CONF_ _ CONF EXP MILEAGE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE POSTAGE OFFICE SUPPLIES GEN SUPPLIES GEN SUPPLIES GEN SUPPLIES GEN SUPPLIES PHOTO SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4202- 120 -12 10- 4202- 120 -12 10- 4202 - 120 -12 10 -4202- 200 -20 10 -4202- 600 -60 10- 4204 - 180 -18 10 -4206- 133 -12 10- 4206 - 140 -14 10- 4206 - 160 -16 10- 4206 - 200 -20 10- 4206 - 420 -42 10 -4206- 500 -50 10- 4208 - 140 -14 10- 4208 - 180 -18 10 -4208- 500 -50 10- 4290 - 510 -51 10- 4306 - 440 -44 10- 4504 - 490 -49 10- 4504 - 510 -51 10- 4504 - 624 -62 10- 4504- 627 -62 10 -4508- 140 -14 10- 4516 - 140 -14 •s• -CKS •++ -CKS + +• -CKS •+• -CKS 189.29 • 293195 10/14/86 323.64 GOLF CAR MIDWEST 323.64 • 293203 10/13/86 10.30- PETTY CASH 293203 10/13/86 10.30 PETTY CASH 293203 10/13/86 10.30 PETTY CASH 293203 10/13/86 12.50 PETTY CASH 293203 10/13/86 _ 14.00 PETTY CASH 293203 10/13/86 3.78 PETTY CASH 293203 10/13/86 17.00 PETTY CASH 293203 10/13/86 104.76 PETTY CASH 293203 10/13/86 6.55 PETTY CASH 293203 10/13/86 47.50 PETTY CASH 293203 10/13/86 18.00 PETTY _ CASH 293203 10/13/86 8.00 PETTY CASH 293203 10/13/86 3.36 PETTY CASH 293203 10/13/86 3.78 PETTY CASH 293203 10/13/86 5.25 PETTY CASH 293203 10/13/86 3.88 PETTY CASH 293203 10/13/86 - - -- 13.02 PETTY CASH -- 293203 10/13/86 3.38 PETTY CASH 293203 10/13/86 6.00 PETTY CASH 293203 10/13/86 8.95 PETTY CASH 293203 10/13/86 27.25 PETTY CASH 293203 10/13/86 47.72 PETTY CASH 293203 _ 10/13/86 _ 2.50 PETTY CASH 367.48 • EQUIP MAINT 10 -4274- 420 -42 69193 RADIO SERV _ 10- 4294 - 440 -44 68903 RADIO SERV 10- 4294- 440 -44 69406 REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 671 -66 CORRECTION PARKING PARKING PARK 6 CONF_ _ CONF EXP MILEAGE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE POSTAGE OFFICE SUPPLIES GEN SUPPLIES GEN SUPPLIES GEN SUPPLIES GEN SUPPLIES PHOTO SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4202- 120 -12 10- 4202- 120 -12 10- 4202 - 120 -12 10 -4202- 200 -20 10 -4202- 600 -60 10- 4204 - 180 -18 10 -4206- 133 -12 10- 4206 - 140 -14 10- 4206 - 160 -16 10- 4206 - 200 -20 10- 4206 - 420 -42 10 -4206- 500 -50 10- 4208 - 140 -14 10- 4208 - 180 -18 10 -4208- 500 -50 10- 4290 - 510 -51 10- 4306 - 440 -44 10- 4504 - 490 -49 10- 4504 - 510 -51 10- 4504 - 624 -62 10- 4504- 627 -62 10 -4508- 140 -14 10- 4516 - 140 -14 •s• -CKS •++ -CKS + +• -CKS •+• -CKS 1986 OF EDINA CHECK STER 10 -20 -81 4GE 9 CHECK NO. _DATE_ __ __ ___ _ AMOUNT-__, -___ _ __ ----VENDOR. __ _ - __ITEM- DESCRIPTION __- _____ACCOUNT _NO_INV._ -* P.O. • MESSAGE ss **ss ••• -CKS 293206 10/09/86 691.60 G 6 K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10- 4262- 301 -30 293206 10/09/86 251.00 _ . G d K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 560 -56 293206 10/09/86 297.15 G & K SERVICES - -_,_ LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 646 -64 293206 10/09/86 142.00 G 6 K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10 -4512- 540 -54 293206 10/09/86 321.75 G R K SERVICES LAUNDRY - 40 -4262- 801 -80 1,703.50 • - *ss * ** _ . - -- *** -CKS 293215 10/14/86 14.99 HIRSHFIELDS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 14.99 • * * * *** *** -CKS 293220 10/13/86 511.26 HAR NED LUMBER CO CONSTRUCTION 27- 1300 - 000 -00 511.26 • *s**** *** -CKS 293228 10/14/86 - 111.00 _ -HILLSTROM AUTO SUP Y GEN SUPPLIES_ 10 -4504- 301 -30 293228 10/14/86 1,879.75 HILLSTROM AUTO SUP - Y REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 293228 10/14/861 31.90 HILLSTROM AUTO SUP Y TOOLS 10- 4580- 560-56 293228 10/14/86 224.69 HILLSTROM AUTO SUP Y PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 293228 10/14/86 34.98 HILLSTROM AUTO SUP Y REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 2,282.32 • *s** ** • ** -CKS 293231 10/13/86 388.00 HOFFERS INC LUMBSER _ 10- 4604 - 642 -64 33454 388.00 • .__ * * ***s -- - -- - - **• -CKS 293238 10/14/86 24.00 um H MCCOY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 08152 24.00 • s **sss *•• -CKS 293245 10/13/86 60.00 ROBERT B HILL - -- CALCIUM CHLORIDE 27 -4520- 661 -66 60.00 • * * *sss * ** -CKS 293249_ 1.0/15/86100.00_ _- uILLIAM_HOFFMAN - _POLICE _SERVICSE— 10- 41_00- 420- 42___ 100.00 • -___ **• -CKS 293267 10/14/86 500.98 IBM CORPORATION SERVICE CONTRACT 10- 4288 - 510 -51 - - - - - - -- - - -- -- 500_98_ ** *-CKS 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 293277 10/13/86 293278 10/14/86 293278 10/13/86 LUMBER CO ::3*::: 10/15/86 LUMBER CO :::*a:: 10/15/86 293292 10/13/86 ssssss KNOX 293295 10/09/86 ssssss KNOX 293302 10/09/86 293302 10/09/86 ittttt CO 293304 10/14/86 293304 10/10/86 293304 10/10/86 293304 10/15/86 293304 10/09/86 293304 10/13/86 293304 10/09/86 293304 10/13/86 293304 10/09/86 tss #ss 293307 10/09/86 293307 10/09/86 ssssss 293311 10/09/86 293311 10/09/86 293311 - -- 10/09/86 AMOUNT 137.50 137.50 s 13.23 4.30 17.53 • 100.00 100.00 • CHECK REGISTER 10 -20 -86 PAGE 10 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION _ ___ACCOUNT NO. INV.- • P.O. 0 MESSAGE CARLSON PRINTING GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 520 -52 36183 JERRYS FOODS CLEAN SUPP _ 10 -4512- 440 -44 JERRYS FOODS CONCESSIONS 27- 4624- 664 -66 - •tt —CKS WALTER JOHNSON POLICE SERVICSE 10- 4100 - 420 -42 726.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO INSURANCE 10 -4260- 510 -51 8,714.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO INSURANCE 10 -4260- 510 -51 - - 9,440.00 • - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - 40.59 40.59 • 2,864.68 5,946.42 8,811.10 • TRIARCO ARTS 6 CRAFT CRAFT SUPPLY 23- 4588- 616 -61 KUETHER DIST CO KUETHER DIST CO 115.18 KNOX LUMBER CO 40.41 KNOX LUMBER CO 35.69 KNOX LUMBER CO 79.04 KNOX LUMBER CO 30.46 KNOX LUMBER CO 45.19 KNOX LUMBER CO 13.67 KNOX LUMBER CO 9.91 KNOX LUMBER CO 49.83 KNOX LUMBER CO _ 419.38 • INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 822 -82 INVENTORY INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 842 -84 KOCH ASPHALT GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 345 -30 465304 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 330 -30 465392 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 449465 LUMBER 10- 4604- 646 -64 465285 LUMBER 10- 4604- 646 -64 465070 LUMBER 10- 4604- 646 -64 465186 LUMBER_ 10- 4604- 646 -64 454629 LUMBER 10- 4604- 646 -64 465345 PARTS 27- 4620- 661 -66 465072 5,287.61 KOCH ASPHALT INVENTORY 10- 4526- 314 -30 5,305.16 KOCH ASPHALT ROAD OIL 10 -4526- 314 -30 10,592.77 • _ _ 2,691.45 EASTSIDE BEVERAGE INVENTORY 50- 4630- 822 -82 5,144.00 EASTSIDE BEVERAGE INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86_ 7,307.10 _ EASTSIDE BEVERAGE INVENTORY 50- 4632- 842 -84 15,142.55 • *00—CKS •s• —CKS •ss —CKS •ss —CKS •ss —CKS sss —CKS )51 293323 10/10/86 --I ____293323_______i0i14/S6 5.00 LINHOFF 10.00 LINHOO 15.00 • PHOTO SUPPLIES PHOTO SUPPLIES 10 -4508- 440 -44 1 418 1986 OF EDINA CHECK STER 10-20-8► tGE 11 .__CHECK­,_NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM__DE_S_CR1_PT ION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P-..O.---# -MESSAGE - ------ CKS 293313 10/10/86 443.20 JOHN H FOSTER CONT REPAIRS 40-4248-601-80 293313/1__1_o_/1__0/86_____ 309.39 JOHN H FOSTER CONT REPAIRS 40-4248-801-80 293341 10/13/86 32.89 M & I IND SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-560-56 095237 752.59 32.89 J.17 rrs -CKS 293315 10/14/86 14S.S0 ANCHOR PAPER GEN SUPPLIES 27-4504-661-66 98.24 14S.S0 293344 10/10/86 16.80 MED OXYGEN & EQUIP EQUIP MAINT 10-4274-449-44 13 293344 ***-CKS 50.54 MED OXYGEN & EQUIP 1ST AID SUPPLIES 10-4510-440-44 71 54 293344 10/13/86 381.25 MED OXYGEN & EQUIP SAFETY EQUIP 293317 10/14/86 87.78 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 0/13/96 4,232.25 - 293317 10/13/86 146.34 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-322-30 :-_29331710/114/86 290.28 LAWSON PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 10-4504-3e2-30 293317 10/13/86 274.99 ---GEN LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 325 -30 293317 293317 10/14/86 10/13/86 419.87 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-646-64 360.04---- LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-646-64 293311 10/13/86 356.27 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 293317 10/14/86 284.83 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 40-4504-801-80 e.249.Ao 293318 10/09/86 87.80 LEEF BROS INC LAUNDRY 10-4e6e-440-44 29331 S ------ 10/09/86 14. SS LEEF BROS INC GEN SUPPLY 23-4504-611-61 293318 10/09/86 30.00 LEEF BROS INC LAUNDRY_ 27-4262-662-66 132.65 • )51 293323 10/10/86 --I ____293323_______i0i14/S6 5.00 LINHOFF 10.00 LINHOO 15.00 • PHOTO SUPPLIES PHOTO SUPPLIES 10 -4508- 440 -44 1 418 9 •00-CKS 293336 29.85_ - --LA'NCE--- CONCESSIONS 27-46247ki4- 293341 10/13/86 32.89 M & I IND SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-560-56 095237 32.89 J.17 rrs -CKS �' 293343 10/14/86 98.24 MINNESOTA CLOVE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 8043 98.24 293344 10/10/86 16.80 MED OXYGEN & EQUIP EQUIP MAINT 10-4274-449-44 13 293344 10/14/86 50.54 MED OXYGEN & EQUIP 1ST AID SUPPLIES 10-4510-440-44 71 54 293344 10/13/86 381.25 MED OXYGEN & EQUIP SAFETY EQUIP 10-4642-420-42 7 lo 44i.59 0/13/96 4,232.25 - jMETR0 'WASTE CONTROL CODa_B_LAq_MR"_jTS -3095-000-00 7 7, 16 9 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -20 -86 PAGE 12 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION -_ -------- ACCOUNT_N0.- __INV._i P.O. 0 MESSAGE 4,232.25 s * * * * ** - se* -CKS 293358 10/09/86 4.52 NATL GUARDIAN SYST ALARM SERV _ - - -_- 23- 4304 - 610 -61 293358 10/13/86 196.91 NATL GUARDIAN SYST ALARM SERVICE 28- 4304 - 708 -70 293358 10/09/86 135.33 NATL GUARDIAN SYST ALRM SERVICE 50- 4304 - 821 -62 293358 10/09/86 157.39 NATL GUARDIAN SYST ALARM SERVICEE _- 50- 4304 - 861 -86 494.15 s 293359 10/14/86 18.34 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTAS _ 10- 4540 - 560 -56 633414 293359 10/14/86 .30 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 662 -66 634544 293359 10/10/86 94.23 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 662 -66 633312 112.87 s 293360 10/09/86 13.25 MINNESOTA WANNER CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 322 -30 064336 293360 10/09/86 52.00 MINNESOTA WANNER -- CONT REPAIRS — - - - - 10- 4248 - 322 30 -- - - - -- 064337 -- 65.25 * ****** *** -CKS 293365 10/15/86 100.00 BURT MERFELD POLICE SERVICSE 10- 4100 - 420 -42 100.00 • 293366 10/09/86 367.00 MINNESOTA BAR INVENTORY 50 -4632- 842 -84 293366 10/09/86 214.31 MINNESOTA BAR INVENTORY 50- 4632- 862 -86 * * * * ** so*-CKS 293370 10/15/86 54.76 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO CONCESSIONS 28- 4624 - 704 -70 293370 10/13/86 62.79 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO CONCESSIONS 28- 4624- 704 -70 16298 117.55 ****** sss -CKS 293378 10/09/86 4,385.20 MARK VII SALES INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 822 -82 293378 10/09/86 6,901.60 MARK VII SALES INVENTORY_ _ 50- 4630- 842 -84 293378 10/09/86 6,237.05 MARK VII SALES INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 862 -86 17,523.85 * 293379 1014/86 31.50 METRO FONE COMM GEN SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 224767 31.50 * * * * * *s **s -CKS 293381 10/09/86 282.71 STAR 6 TRIBUNE - -- ADVERTISING — - - -- 23 -4214- 610 -61 293381 10/13/86 - -- — 97.20 - - - STAR 6 TRIBUNE - - ADVERTISING 29- 4212 - 720 -72- 379.91 s *** -CKS 293388 10/13/86 9.45 NTL ATOMIK MOTOR REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 - 9.45 s - -- - - - -- - - -- - - - -- -- - * * * * ** *** -CKS W 1986 293391­- 293400 293412 i'�29341 6 -- 29341 6- 293417 293417 OF EDINA 1.0./I-5/86.- ­ 10/09/86 CHECK . STER 10-e0 -8c ,GE 13 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO—MV. 0 MESSAGE 68, 512. 00 ...N. S. P...­COMPANY ION—,----60--1.300-2k4=-04--64537 68,512.00 3,181.31 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO .3j 10/14/86 100.95 NU GRAPHIC SUPPLY 100.9s 10/15/86 ***-CKS 10/13/86 110.00 -109.57 OFFICE PRODUCTS 10%13/86 16--4504--646--64- OFFICE-PRODUCTS 219.57 OLSON CHAIN & CABLE 10/14/86 4/86 1-1 641. -66 -OFFSET PRINTING— 10/13/86 156.00 OFFSET PRINTING 293429 1.803.00 s _293429 293421 10/13/86 293421 10/15/86 ssssss 2- 9- i -4 oe*-CKS i TIRES & TUBES 10-4616-560-56 ***-CKS INVESTORY SUPPLY e3-1209-000-00 128161 *so-CKS i. GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-13312 8410 OFFICE SUPPLIES -S 10-4516-600- - 60 PRINTING 10- 4600- 420 -42 PRINTING 10-4600-420-42 27026 293424 10/15/86 ***-CKS 60.12 '11i CHAIN & CABLE ss�sas 16--4504--646--64- '62-647'-- 1,201.72 OLSON CHAIN & CABLE 293429 0/13/8 6 koj _,_ 293429 - -__,1 10/09/86 293429 10/09/86 _293429 10/09/86 ***-CKS 825.00 47 I BROOMS 293434 10/13/86 ssssss 2- 9- i -4 oe*-CKS i TIRES & TUBES 10-4616-560-56 ***-CKS INVESTORY SUPPLY e3-1209-000-00 128161 *so-CKS i. GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-13312 8410 OFFICE SUPPLIES -S 10-4516-600- - 60 PRINTING 10- 4600- 420 -42 PRINTING 10-4600-420-42 27026 29.3441 10/10/86 209.60 THE PRINT SHOP -RT I N G 10 600 -6 26-62 6645 slv v I ***-CKS 60.12 OLSON CHAIN & CABLE GE , N SUPPLY ------ 16--4504--646--64- '62-647'-- 1,201.72 OLSON CHAIN & CABLE CONSTRUCTION 60-1300-264-04 63113 1 L261 .84 ***-CKS 825.00 OLD DOMINION BRUSH BROOMS 10-4534-310-30 095538 825.00 ***-CKS —1201.001 —PEPSI COLA BOTTLING _CONCESSIONS 105.70 400.05 PEPSI PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COLA BOTTLING_.,;, INVENTORY INVENTORY .28-4624-704-70 50-463e-8e2-8e 50-4632-842-84 319.90 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50-4632-86e-86 65 73.92 PRINTERS SERVICE INC EQUIP MAINT e8-4274-707-70 6509 73.92 ***-CKS —iii-.Oi — Pki-ok—LAK-E Ad SAND GRAVEL 40-45e2-803-80 276.06 '2I' 29.3441 10/10/86 209.60 THE PRINT SHOP -RT I N G 10 600 -6 26-62 6645 slv v I 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -20 -86 PACE 14 1 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. • MESSAGE (a 209.60 • I ssssss *so-CKS 293443 10/09/86_ 134.10_ POMMER MFG CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 627_ -62 48294__ J 293443 1014/86 20.30 POMMER MFG CO REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 661 -66 48335 °I 154.40 • ssssss sss -CKS _ 293452____10/14 /86_ 64.88 QUICK SERV BATTERY _ REPAIR PARTS 10_- 4540 - 560 -56 13360___ 293452 10/14/86 91.20 QUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR PARTS 10 -4546- 566 -56 61703 156.08 • s s s s s s- - -- - -- --- - - - - - -- - - -- - - -_ —_ -- _— —_ --------- ---- -- s s s -CKS � I° ^� 293455 10/14/86 96.08 RITEWAY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 37297M - - - -- 9 6.08 * - — - -- -- - - - - -- - - -. rsssss ssr -CKS 293457 10/14/86 236.19 R.L.COULD 6 CO.INC. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 78010 i. 236.19 • _ --- - - -**r -CKS— I- 293460 10/09/86 112.45 ROYAL CROWN BEV INVENTORY SO- 4632- 822 -82 _ 293460 10/09/86 151.20 ROYAL CROWN BEV INVENTORY 50- 4632- 842 -84 293460 10/09/86 220.80 ROYAL CROWN BEV INVENTORY 50- 4632- 862 -86 484.45 • - - - - -- - - - —_ rrr►rr srs -CKS ... , •, 293462 10/14/86 99.65 RENTAL EQUIP 3 SALES TOOLS 10 -4580- 353 -30 3728 99.65 293463 10/09/86 2,613.95 REX DIST INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 822 -82 293463 _ 10/09/86 — _ 4,113.42 _ REX DIST INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84 .I 293463 — 10/14/86 4,552.60 REX DIST INVENTORY SO- 4630- 862 -86 11,279.97 inz �� -- sssssr 293471 10/15/86 626.67 KENNETH E_ROSLAND CONFERENCE 10 -4206- 140 -14- 293471 10%15%86 — 140.00 _ KENNETH E ROSLAND CONF 6 TRANS 50- 4206 - 840 -84 47 766.67 s -- — s*r-CKS I „ 293485 10/13/86 1,423.02 STATE BLDG INSP BLDG PERMITS 10- 3095 - 000 -00 "I 293485 10/13/86 128.50 STATE BLDG INSP SUR CHG TAX 10- 3113 - 000 -00 1,551.52 r oa „ 35 293486 10/14/86 55.80 DON STF �^ 55.80 • s 1986 OF EDINA CHECK STER 10 -20 -6 AGE 15 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. P.O. T - _ 2 3 rtriw• - _..-- - - - -rr• -CKS- i,; ' 293490 10/13/86 21.90 SHERWIN WILLIAMS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 ° 293490 10/13/86 38_99 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 10- 4544 - 646 =64 n I' 60.89 • -- - - -- ° trrssr 293492 10/14/86 36.53 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 128126 -'Z 293492___10/14/86 62..70_ SOUTHDALE.FORD REPAIR -PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 - 56_128578 " ___________ � 293492 10/14/86 173.35- SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 128086 — 293492 10/14/86 20.54 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 128222 293492_ ___ 10/14/86 — 86.66._- _ —_- SOUTHDALE ,FORD REPAIR_PARATS 10-4540-560-56128282 6 293492 10/14/86 62.70 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 128133 95.78 • 293493 10/09/A6 3,638.05 - SOUTHSIDE DIET COINC INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 822 -82 _ 293493 10/09/86 4,592.68 SOUTHSIDE DIST COINC INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84 - --------- - - - - -- - - -- 8.230.73 —23 ti *rir rtr —CKS a ?' 293502 10/14/86 5.14 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 63664 293502 10/14/86 19.68 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 63772 c Z - -- 24, 82_ • _ _ --- - -- 293503 10/10/86 109.79 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 520 -52 c 293503 10/10/86 43.90 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR_PARTS 1.0 -4540- 520 -52 293503 10/10/86 52.86 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 293503 10/10/86 16.41 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 II413 293503 95.23- SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP- CREDIT - -_. -- _ 10- 4540 - 520 -52 I3A -- 293503 10/10/86 102.22 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 I" 293503 10/13/86 37.83 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARATS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 c �„ -- — - 267.78 t - - -- - - -- 'A tssrsw *00-CKS ,,fc ° 293505 S 10/14/86 86.90 SUN CONSTRUCTION 10- 1492 - 000 -00 �,. ST PAUL BOOK— wwtstt SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 440 -44 293508 - - - -- 10/14/86 . ^' 293508 10/14/86 e 293S08 — 10/14/86 ST 2 93508 10/10/86 . "' 293508 10/13/86 ST ----- - -- - - -- — -- BOOK 531 srrrrs 293526 10/14/86 293526 10/09/86 74.32 ST PAUL BOOK— GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 440 -44 16.29 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 440 -44 7_51- ST PAUL BOOK CREDIT_._ —_ 10- 4504- 510 -51 29.51 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 17.03 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 23- 4504- 611 -61 1;nul WiL 1,330.00 TRACY OIL GASOLINE GASOLINE 10 -4612- 560 -56 10 -4612- 560 -56 rrt -CKS I.IIc ,c �I rrt -CKS c I„ vry 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -20 -86 PACE 16 CHECK NO. DATE_ _ AMOUNT — — VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. • MESSAGE —_ — _r -! -- -- - Z 6,702.56 • ssssss sss -CKS . ^ 293530 10/14/86 306._00 TEXCAS CORP GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 318 -30 - - - -- ' ' (: - - - - -- - -- 306.00 t -- - -- - � ssssss sss -CKS 293539 10/09/86 659.00 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY CHEMICALS 27- 4564- 662 -66 17441 . I z-- -- — 659_00 M - - - -- f - - - -- - -- a� ssssss sss -CKS 293541 10/09/86 24.99 TARGET — GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504- 446 -44 293541 10/09/86 35.98 TARGET DRAFTING SUPPLY 10- 4505 - 133 -12 293541 10/09/86_ 77.80 TARGET AMMUNTION 29- 4572- 720 -72 _ .— 138.77 i - - - - -- - - - -- -- — --- - - - - -- --- . � 293542 10/09/86 8,790.05 DIST INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 862 -8-6 — — _ — _-- 8,790.05 • _THORPE _— -- - ssssss *00-CKS ' 'I( 293548 10/14/86 914.35 CITY WEST PRINTING 23- 4600 - 610 -61 914.35 ssssss sss -CKS 293553 293553 10/10/86 10/10/86 UNITED ELECTRIC UNITED ELECTRIC CORP CORP REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 322 -30 10- 4540- 322 -30 17.27 15.37 293553 10/10/86 80.55 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARATS— 4540 - 330 -30 93553 2 _ _ 10/10/86 51.71 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS .10- 10 -4540- 520 -52 ,Isl 293553 10/10/86 39.83 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 293553 10/10/86 23.49 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTAS 10- 4540 - 646_ -64 _ 293553 10/10/86 140.82 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 661 -61 _ 293553 10/10/86 5.51 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 661 -66 293553 10/10/86 178.42_ UNITED ELECTRIC CORP_ GEN SUPPLIES_ 40- 4504 - 807 -80 i, 293553 10%10/86 136.53 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 293553 10/10/86 136.53 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 802 -80 �..� 293553 - -- 10/10/86 268.73 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 802 -80 - - - 1 , 094.76 -- �a^ i rerrrr sts -CKS � -,1 ^ 293572 10/10/86 812.27 VAN PAPER CO PAPER SUPPLIES 50- 4514 - 822 -82 r +� 293572 10/10/86 1,630.75 VAN PAPER CO PAPER SUPPLIES 50- 4514 - 842 -84 293572 10%10%86 1,014.20 VAN PAPER CO PAPER SUPPLIES 50- 4514 - 862 -86 3,457.22 s 293573 10/10/86 52.32 VOSS REPAIR PARTAS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 31530 ^ ]a 52.32 s „I 5, ssssss tss -CKS 7- " 293575- ._ 10/13/86 ' . _ - _- _ -_ _ 355.00 WATER PRODUCTS REPAIR- PARTS _ - __ 40 -4540- 803 -80 .021555. __ i„ 1986 OF EDINA CHECK STER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION _2 10-20-86&GE 17 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. • MESSAGE 293575 10/14/86 95.00 WATER PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 40-4540-603-80 021929 293576 10/15/86 629.00 - ----- WATER PRODUCTS REPAIRPARTS 1,079.00 T ------ ***-CKS a 293578 10/14/86 195.98 UM.H.ZIEGLER CO INC CONT REPAIRS 10-4248-560-56 9 ­___..293S78 10/14/86 75.29 WM.H.ZIEGLER CO INC PARTS 10-4620-560-56 293578 10/14/86 122.33 UM.N.ZIEGLER CO INC PARTS 10-4620-560--56 393.60 Oil STEEL-4DWk GEN SUPPLIES 16-4964--3-0-1-30 18644 293579 10/14/86 140.89 WILLIAMS STEEL-HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-318-30 47303 _293S79 ------ 57.68 ---­--­WILLIAMS WILLIAMS STEEL-HDWE - GEN SUPPLIES 0- 4504 - 400 -40 46685 lo 293579 10/14/86 64 STEEL-HDWE TOOLS .1 10-4580-301-30 47664 293579 10/10/86 57.68 WILLIAMS STEEL-HOUE TOOLS 10-4580-301-30 46685 -lei 293579 10/14/86 179.99 772.39 WILLIAMS STEEL-HDUE WELDING SUPPLIES 10-4610-560-56 46990 Lp 293586 10/13/86 830.75 U U GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 40-4540-803-80 z' 830.75 �21 21 ***-CKS �2. 293590 10/15/86 100.00 HENRY UROBLESKI POLICE SERVICSE 10-4100-420-42 1 30 100.00 +** -CKS Pl--- 293593 ­10/09/86- 10/14/86 42.00 _23.46___ MINNESOTA CLAY -INVENTORY-SUPP 23-1209-000-00 08381 293593 MINNESOTA CLAY INVENTORY SUPPLY 23-1209-000-00 293593 10/09/86 20.80 86.20 MINNESOTA CLAY CRAFT SUPPLY 23-4588-616-61 08276 +++ -CKS 293612 1 0/_ 16/66 252._46 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 -,, -, - -, -- -,-,-- - -,,e-e,233- 293612 10/10/86 61.55 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP BLACKTOP 10-4524-803-80 e2e33 314.01 293616 10/10/86 417.95 MILLPORE ENGINEERING GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-482-48 93e89 t7 417.95 293702 10/09/86 154.50 NORTHSTAR ICE INVENTORY 50-463e-822-8e 293702-- 10i09/86 283.00'_ NORTHSTAR ICE INVENTORY 50-4632-84e-84 293702 10/09/86 363.00 NORTHSTAR ICE INVENTORY 50-463e-86e-86 800.50 293703 10/13/86 130.00 HIBERNIA BREWING LTD INVENTORY 50-4630-8e2-8e 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10-20-86 'PACE Is I CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. 0 MESSAGE 293703 10/09/86 120.00 HIBERNIA BREWING LTD INVENTORY 50-4630-842-84 250.00 • 293704 10/09/86 48.00 TWIN CITY HOME JUICE INVENTORY 50-4632-842-84 7 48.00 • 1 7 000-CKS 293706 10/09/86 295.00 RALPH LAVIK AMBULANCE REFUND 10-3180-000-00 295.00 I. 293707 10/09/86 29.58 EVELYN KJOS CONT SERV 40-4e00-800 -80 29.58 293708 10/09/86 1,054.50 BARRETT MOVING CONT SERV 10-4200-180-18 9e66 j17 1,054.50 • 293709 10/09/86 62.17 TOM HALLORAN EXCESS SUPPLIES 20-4624-704-70 62.17 293710 10/09/86 648.99 KRAEMER & SONS INC CLASS V MATERIALS 10-4532-301-30 78627 648.99 • 293711 10/09/86 96.02 D C HEY COMPANY INC GEN SUPPLIES 23-4504-611-61 022469 96.02 • 293712 ---- 10/09/86 17.51 CEDAR SMALL ENGINE REPAIR PARTS 27-4540-662-66 8918 17.51 293713 10%09%86 1,185.87 H 0 M-Ef-INC REIMBURSEMENT 10-113e-000-00 11185.87 293714 10/10/86 46.54 TWIN CITY ELEVATOR CONT REPAIRS 10-4248-520-52 09092 46.54 • 293715 10/09/86 A PLUS PRESORT INC POSTAGE 16.60 10-4290-510-51 16.60 293716 10/09/86 -- 5,205 :00 CURRAN V NIELSEN CO CONSTRUCTION 27-1300-000-00 7517 51205.00 29371 10/14/86 484.65 DON SCHIPPER C 8 CO CONT SERV 27-4200-661-66 6371 293717 10/09/86 393.10 DON $CHIPPER C S CO CONT SERV 27-4200-661-66 6372 877.75 • 17 293718 10/09/86 78.00 ADVANCE PAGING SERV GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-500-50 65719 78.00 293719 10/09/86 26.00 JERRYS PRINTING DRAFTING SPLY 10-4505-133-12 26.00 293720 10/09/86 136.96 MOLLIE PAULSON CONT SERVICES 23-4200-610-61 54 293721 10/09/86 136.96 22.66 MARIENE SNYDER REFUND 40-3525-000-00 1986 C. 7 'j 293724 - -- " 293724 ,2 OF EDINA 10/09/86 w6fA4 10/14/86 10/09/86 CHECK STER VENDOR ITEM D 22.66 • _ ______ _ 7.54 kEVIkTHOR0__ REFUND 7.54 • 179.74 179.74 • 150.00 125.00 275.00 • 293725 10/09/66 3,580.00 00 293726 10/09/86 658.35 658.35 293727 10/09/86 290 00 DAVES FOOD WAGON CONCESSIONS SPOTLESS' INC CONT - SERV SPOTLESS INC CONT SERV BRYANT AIR COND RADIO EQUIPMENT 10-20-8. AGE 19 ACCOUNT NOl_NVk_P. 0_0 -MESSAGE--, 40-3525-000-00 27-4624-664-66 27- 4200- 661 -66 27-4200-661-66 9153 10-4914-420-42 RTW INC CONT SERV 10-4200-510-51 pnov Mine . 293735 - .DV7.DV 97.36 N LAND ELECTRIC SPLY REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-330-30 97.36 29373b 10/10/86 17.16 PIPE FABRICATORS INC CONT REPAIRS 40-4246-802-80 7933 17.16 293737 10/10/86 16.98 ACTION LIGHTING REPAIR PARATS 10- 4540 - 322 -30 24037 ` 16.98 • 29-3-73e 10/13/86 137.50 HENN COUNTY RUBBISH REMOVAL 10-4250-353-30 12557 293738 10/10/86 2,985.83 HENN COUNTY CONSTRUCTION 60-1300-264-04 10268 4 ICATING W Wmm OurrL.1 1 10-4504-420-42 6 659557 293727 1 10/13/86 9 98.70 C COPY DUPLICATING G GEN SUPPLIES 1 10-4504-540-54 388.70 293728 1 10/09/86 1 136.29 W WALTER F STEPHENS S SAFETY EQUIP 1 10-4642-420-42 A A22906 117 2 293729 1 10/09/86 1 150.00 D DEPT OF PUBLIC T TELETYPE SERV 1 10-4268-420-42 8 860516 150.00 293730 1 10/09/86 1 176.99 V VECTOR ONE D DUES 1 10-4204-140-14 176.99 - 293731 1 10/09/66 2 297.00 T THE TRAVEL AGENCY C CONF 1 10-4202-140-14 3 30862 • . - • . 293732 1 10/09/86 5 515.10 N NATL FIRE F FIRE PREVENTION 1 10-4650-440-44 515.10 -_'293733 ­ ­­10/09/86 3 3,550.00 F FRANK B HALL & CO I INSURANCE 1 10-4260-510-51 293733 1 1Oil 5/86 _ FRANK B HALL - INSURANCE 1 10-4260-510-51 7,884.00 • • 10-4504-540-54 1-J-293734 1 10/09/86 3 369.50 A ALPHA VIDk" AUDIO G GiN SUPPLY 1 293735 - .DV7.DV 97.36 N LAND ELECTRIC SPLY REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-330-30 97.36 29373b 10/10/86 17.16 PIPE FABRICATORS INC CONT REPAIRS 40-4246-802-80 7933 17.16 293737 10/10/86 16.98 ACTION LIGHTING REPAIR PARATS 10- 4540 - 322 -30 24037 ` 16.98 • 29-3-73e 10/13/86 137.50 HENN COUNTY RUBBISH REMOVAL 10-4250-353-30 12557 293738 10/10/86 2,985.83 HENN COUNTY CONSTRUCTION 60-1300-264-04 10268 4 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -20 -86 PAGE 20 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. 0 P.O. • MESSAGE 3,123.33 293739 10/10/86 43.22 J H LARSON ELECT CO CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 264 -04 057412 293739 10/10/86 41.53 J H LARSON ELECT CO CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 264 -04 433960 84.75 293740 10/10/86 176.00 RIDDLE CONTROL PROD CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 264 -04 860906 176.00 • 293741 10/10/86 102.10 WARNING LITES OF MN CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 264 -04 46297 102.10 293742 10/10/86 139.00 TWIN CITY SANDBLAST CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 264 -04 6759 139.00 + 293743 10/10/86 21.89 BLOOMINGTN FREEWAY REPAIR PARTAS 10- 4540- 560 -56 59694 21.89 • 293744 10/10/86 371.53 GUSTAVE A LARSON CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 535431 371.53 • 293745 10/10/86 48.62 EMR REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 084987 48.62 • 293746 10/13/86 11805.95 BACHMANS CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 373 -01 1,805.95 293747 10/13/86 521.65 PLANT 6 FLANGED EO REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 811 -80 562 521.65 + 293748 10/13/86 17.33 MARK T SCHEUNEMAN SUPPLEMENTAL INS 10- 4157- 510 -51 17.33 ` - -- 293749 10/13/86 24.00 AM FORESTRY ASSN ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 10- 4204 - 120 -12 24.00 • 293750 10/15/86 600.54 GOPHER OIL CO CONT REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 707 -70 293750 10/13/86 240.00 GOPHER OIL CO GEN SUPPLIES-----.--.--- 26- 4504 - 707 -70 288987 840.54 r - 293751 10/13/86 11.00 TIRE TOWN - - - - -- - - CONT REPAIRS 28-4248-707-70-'18672 11.00 • 293752 10/13/86 25.00 PLUNKETTS INC GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 708 -70 283697 25.00 s - 293753 10/13/86 6,180.00 SERVICEMASTER SERVICES 27- 4236- 661 -66_ 293753 10/13/86 180.00 SERVICEMASTER ___ ___ SERVICES 27 -4236- 661 -66 293753 10/13/86 6,180.00- SERVICEMASTER CORRECTION 27- 4236- 661 -66 180.00 .I 293754 10/13/86 65.00 GREATER MPLS AREA DUES 10- 4204 - 200 -20 _ _ - - - -- - -- -- - --- - - -- 65.00 • = 293755 10/13/86 27.30 MARY RIESGRAF ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 1 1986 OF EDINA 500.00 • CHECK STER 10 -20 -8. AGE 21 i CHECK _NO. DATE _ 10/13/86 VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. 0 P MESSAGE 29- 4504- 720 -72 5439___ _ - -_- _AMOUNT `. _ -. _ITEM _ - 76.66 . -INV. -.0._• 293755 10/13/86 25.30 MARY RIESGRAF ART WORK SOLD 23 -3625- 000 -00 VANTAGE ELECTRIC 293.75S._._..__10/13/86___ __,___ ----25.30-. MARY RIESGRAF . ._. _- _CORRECTION_ 3625- 000 -00 ' 3 456.25 * 27.30 r _23- 293769_._ 293756 1.0/13/86 -_ _ 25.30 _ - ROGNHILD__BERGSTOL__ 40- 4248 - 603 -80 23 -3625- 000 -00 °I 293769 10/13/86 25.30 MPLS & SUB SEWER -__ART _WORK_SOLD 40 -4248- 803 -80 - - - - - -- -- - - -- - -- - ' 293757 10/13/86 28.00 DEBBIE__GUSTAFSON.. _._,___._.__ ART,-WORK-.-,SOLD-.. CONT REPAIRS 23 -3625- 000 -00 ' ° 28.00 • 10/13/86 430_00 MPLS & SUB SEWER - - -- 40- 4248 - 803 -80 293758 __-- 10/13/86 38.50 _ KATHY BELL ART_WORK_SOLD 930.00 23- 3625 - 000_00 -- - - -- 38.50 s 29377010/13/86 - -- - - - - 293759_ 1 0/ 13/86__- _ _________ _ 67.52 ___ __ _ _PAT_ CREER _ _ _ __ _ . _ _ _ __.___ ART _.WORK -SOLD 23-3625_-00_0-_00_._____ � ; CIMLINE CONSTRUCTION 67.52 • ' 293760 10/13/86 76.30 MAUREEN BROCKWAY ARTWORK SOLD 23- 3625 000 -00 76.30 - -- '_ ;. _ 293761 _ 10/ 1_3/86 _ 157.50, _ - __SANDRA _CLARK ART YORK SOLD 23 -3625- 000 -0.0 _ 157.50 s 12.25 * 293762 10/13/86 _ 282.80_ BETTY PEDDIE ART WORK SOLD 23 -3625- 000 -00 282.80 • - - -- - r'.. __29376310 /13/86 56.00 SHARKEY - ART SOLD 23_3625 = 000 -00 56.00 • - - 293764 10/13/86 109.90 KOSS PAINT PAINT 27- 4544- 661 -66 31956 j 169.90 • -- -- - -- = __29376.5 1.0/13/86 16.00 PAULUS MEAA CNF 10_4202 - 480 -448 - 293766 _10/13/86_ 500.00 FLORIST CONT SERV 10- 4200 - 180 -18 '; 500.00 • -- - -- i 293767 _ 10/13/86 SAVA INDUSTRIES INC GEN SUPPLIES 29- 4504- 720 -72 5439___ I , ^,. 76.66 . -_,__ -- - -- - _ 293768 1_0/1.3/86 456_,25_ VANTAGE ELECTRIC CONT SERV 10- 4200 - 646 =64 9517 �•f 456.25 * 293769_._ 10/13/86 MPLS. &._SUB SEWER_ CONT REPADIRS 40- 4248 - 603 -80 293769 10/13/86 500.00- MPLS & SUB SEWER CORRECTION 40 -4248- 803 -80 -10512 10512 � 293769 10/13/86 500.00 MPLS & SUB SEWER CONT REPAIRS 40 -4246- 803 -80 10512 ° 293769 10/13/86 430_00 MPLS & SUB SEWER CONT REPAIRS 40- 4248 - 803 -80 10511 930.00 -- - - -- cl 29377010/13/86 4,950.25 _.ROAD EQUIP �17�• '= 293770 10/15/86 822.80 CIMLINE CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 264 -04 5,773.05 * " 293771 10/13/86 12.25 LIFESAVING RESOURCES BOOKS 26- 450E - 688 -68 8409 12.25 * '" J157 s7 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -20 -86 PACE 22 a CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0_P.O. 0 MESSAGE -_ - __ - - -_ -_ITEM - - 293772- 10/13/86 99.60 GUY SPEAKER COMP_ REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 -801- 80_24972 _ - - - __- 99.60 • 293773 10/13/86 120.00 CYLINDER CITY CEN SUPPLY 10- 4504- 646 -64 3352 • -- - -- 120.00 i - - -- -- -- -- -- -- j ° 293774 10/13/86 1 07.85 LYNDALE_CARDEN _CTR CEN _SUPPLIES -_- 1 -0 -4504- 318 -30 68183 - 107.85 _ • i 293775 10/13/86 363.20 ZIP PENN I'NC TOOLS 10- 4580 - 353 -30 _ �- I363.20 -• -- -- -" -- - -- - - - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - ----- - - - - - -- ---- ._.. -- - - 293776 10/13/86 375.62 JIM HATCH SALES CEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 6445 _ ' 293 125 _ 10/13/86 78.30 MERIT SUPPLY- CEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 15277 293776 10/13/86 92.34 JIM HATCH SALES CEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 6465 �^ 293776 10/13/86 92.34 JIM HATCH SALES TOOLS 10- 4580 - 301 -30 6465 293777 10/13/86 25.23 HARRIETTE BACH INVENTORY 23 -1209- 000 -00 25.23 • - - - 293778 10/13/86 264.00 MARIAN ALSTAD_ SERVICES 23- 4100 - 614 -61 �1• - -- 264.00 • - -- - - -- - 11 >I 293779 10/13/86 5,049.00 K 6 K DOOR SYSTEM CONST 27- 1300 - 000 -00 52279 5,049.00 - -- - - -- I I„ 293780 10/13/86 225.00 MIDWAY IND SUPPLY PAINT 10- 4544- 335 -30 -- - - - - -- 225.00 • - - -- -- - - - - -- • , 293781 15.00 BLUE FLAME CAS REGISTRATION 10- 4202- 490 -49 15.0 0 -MN - - � - -- - - -- -- - -- - - '.�� 293782 -- -- - - -- 10/13/86 - -- -- 335.00 KC GROVES TREE REMOVAL - 10- 4200 - 3533 =30 -- - - - - -- " -- - 335.00 + i.: 4 "j 293783 - - 10/13/86 10.00 - OR W 8 SHAW - -- --- - - REFUND - 15- 1111 - 008 -18 -- - - - - -- - - - - - -- 10.00 - - - - -- - - s -_ - -- - - - -- ------- - - - --- ---- - - - -.. - --- �- L 293784 10/13/86 6.85 PETTY CASH SUBSCRIPTION 23 -4204- 610 -61 ' _ 293784 10/13/86 8.82 PETTY CASH PHOTO 23 -4214- 610 -61 �^ 293784 10/13/86 40.09 PETTY CASH OFFICE SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 611 -61 C j] 293784_ _ 10/13/86 _ -_8.64 _ PETTY CASH - - PHOTO BULBS 293784 10/13/86 .10 PETTY CASH ADDITION 23 -4588- 616 -61 { 293784 10/13/86 3.40 PETTY CASH LETTER COUNCIL 23- 4600- 610 -61 q 67.90 • - - -- - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - -- I, ='I n4 293785 10/13/86 50.40 MAUREEN BROCKWAY WORK SOLD 23 -3625- 000 -00 - - - - -- -- -- - -- 50.40_• 293786 10/13/86 1,062.50 VETS TREE SERVICE TREE REMOVAL 10 -4200- 353 -30 _^ 1,062.50 • _ ; ] 293787 10/14/86 1,735.21 SPAULDING SPORTS RANG SUPPLY 27- 4636- 663-66 " ' 1956 OF EDINA CHECK STER 10 -20 -8 AGE 23 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT_. - -- -..-VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV_• P_O. -8 MESSAGE ____ ._ 2 1,735.21 r :93789 10/14/86 a 293790 10/14/86 293791 10/14/86 14 293792 10/14/86 293793 10/14/86 h� 1» i 41 4.. z� 4., I] 47 J 4e 11 52 5? 5- 56 rrr -CKS 670..00 INDEPENDENT 0- GYMNASTICS EQUIP 10= 4504 - 687 -62 670.00 • i• _45.00 KEN _PETERSON - -_i MEETING EXPENSES 50- 4206- 820 -82 45.00 r - - - -- - - - -- - -- -62.77 _AM CREDIT. CONTROL - PAYMENT FINAL BILL 40- 1130 - 000 -00 62.77 r 675.00 ___ - _AM__TEST__CENTER_- __,_EQUIP MAINT 10 -4274- 449 -44 86257_- .- ___. -_ 675.00 r - 264.00 PATTER HELLSTROM ART INST 23- 4100 - 614 -61 264.00 r -- _ -- _._293794 _ 10 /14/86 60.00 PEDDIE -ART INST 23- 4100 = 614 =61_ 60.00 0_00 COMMI_S_SI.ONER OF GASOLINE 10- 4612 - 56000-56 0.00 r 293796_.__ -_1 0/14/86 _ -- 300, 000.00_. _ NORWEST_ BANK MPLS --BONDS _PAYABLE _63 -2060- 000 -00 293796 10/14/86 6,699.00 NORWEST BANK MPLS UNAPP SURPLUS 63 -2490- 000 -00 _293802 10/14/86 306,699.00 r XEROX CORP SERVICE CONTRACT 10 -4288- 510 -51 137179 293797 10/14/86 4,500.00 MOODYS INVESTORS -- "i DUE FROM HRA 10- 1145- 000 -00 368.00__ VERSATILE_ VEHICLE_ 4,500.00 r 293803 2937' 93798 ! 10/14/86 1 56 00 T V FANFARE ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 620 -82 293798 ,�T 10/14/86 1.5600 T V FANFARE ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 640 -84 293798ff�1� 10/14/86 1.56-00 T V FANFARE ADVERTISING 50 =4214- 860 -86 - - 4.68-Off _- _50.51 TARGET - GEN_SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 660 -66 50.51 r 2,598_00 JOE GREUPNER SERVICES 27- 4100 - 675 -66 i^ 2,598.06 _ 293801 10/14/86 __ -- 98.30 ANN SALES_ CO PAPER SUPPLY 27 -4514= 661_ -66 61.21.62__ 98.30 r - _ ^i _293802 10/14/86 156_28 XEROX CORP SERVICE CONTRACT 10 -4288- 510 -51 137179 156.28 r -- "i 293803_10/14/86_ __ - _!10/14/86 368.00__ VERSATILE_ VEHICLE_ SERVICES_. -____ 293803 249.93 VERSATILE VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 671 -66 617.93 r 293804 316.72 DR MARK E NESBIT 316.72 r 66- 1110 -00 I 1986 CITY OF EDINA `1 CHECK NO. DATE _ -_ - - AMOUNT _VENDOR CHECK REGISTER 10 -20 -86 PAGE _ - ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. _0 -P.O._ •.MESSAGE 293805 - - 10/14/86 _ - -- 435.60 - -_- WEST WELD - -__ -__- GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 62280 293805 10/14/86 66.21 WEST WELD WELDING SUPPLIES 10- 4610- 560 -56 62235 293806 10/14/86 112.46 CERT HYDRAULIC SPEC PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 ;Ip 112.46 • 293607­ 10/14%86 123.00 - _ ROBERT J PUGLEGSA PARTS `f 123.00 • 10 -4620- 560 -56 53849 24 " 66.30 • 293815 10/14/86 50.00 QUALITY FITNESS PHY EXAM 10- 4246 - 440 -44 441051 50. 00 + 293816 10/15/86 64.78 STRGAR ROSCOE FAUSCH CONSTRUCTI 64.78 • 293817 10/15/86 300.61 CARLSON SALE COMP GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-390-30-1621 293808 10/14/86 73.60 BLOOMINGTON LINOLEUM REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 860 10/15/86 ^ AQUA ENGINEERING - 73.80 + 293818 10/15/86 569.51 AQUA ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION 293809 10/15/86 1,075.20 ASHLAND CHEM CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 293819 10/15/86 293809 10/14/86 268.50 ASHLAND CHEM CO PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 -- - -- - -- - - - -- - - -1 ,_343.70 + 188.07 CITY OF RICHFIELD POWER S. 293810 10/14/86 1,286.78- HOPKINS DODGE SALES CORRECTION 10- 4540 - 560 -56 293810 i 10/14/86 1,286.78 HOPKINS DODGE SALES REPAIR PARATS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 89978 ,,1 293810 10/14/86 186.78 HOPKINS DODGE SALES REPAIR PARTS - 10- 4540 - 560 -56 89978 %4 186.78 • 293811 10%14/86 24.00 MARY MITCHELL REFUND 10- 3500 - 000 -00 24.00 • 293812 10%14/86 145.87 ROAD RESCUE - - - - -- CONT REPAIRS - 10 -4248- 560 -56 145.87 • 3' 293813 10%14/86 LE ROY LISK CLEAN SUPPLIES 10- 4512 - 440 -44 54.00 54.00 • ' 293814 10/14/86 � - 66.30- INTERSTATE — CONT REPAIRS 16-4246-566-SC-61 , " 66.30 • 293815 10/14/86 50.00 QUALITY FITNESS PHY EXAM 10- 4246 - 440 -44 441051 50. 00 + 293816 10/15/86 64.78 STRGAR ROSCOE FAUSCH CONSTRUCTI 64.78 • 293817 10/15/86 300.61 CARLSON SALE COMP GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-390-30-1621 '^ 293821 10/15/86 594.06 STATE OF MN DEPT CONSTRUCTION i i 60-1300-269-04------ 60-1300-270-04 1 27 -3230- 000 -00 1 10 -4252- 345 -30 1'.1 60- 1300 - 264 -04 47091 1 300.61 • .M1 293818 10/15/86 _ 1,326.03 AQUA ENGINEERING - CONSTRUCTION 293818 10/15/86 569.51 AQUA ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION - - -- - -- --- 1,895.54 + 293819 10/15/86 2,437.80 ROEMER G ROBERTSON MEMORIAL FUND " 2,437.80 • l " 293820 10/15/86 188.07 CITY OF RICHFIELD POWER S. 188.07 • '^ 293821 10/15/86 594.06 STATE OF MN DEPT CONSTRUCTION i i 60-1300-269-04------ 60-1300-270-04 1 27 -3230- 000 -00 1 10 -4252- 345 -30 1'.1 60- 1300 - 264 -04 47091 1 2 ° 7 0 1986 CHECK NO. 293822 293823 293824 OF EDINA DATE 10/15/86 10/I5/86 10/I5/86 AMOUNT 594.06 55.66 55.00 80.00 80.00 266.00 CHECK 'STER VENDOR AM PUBLIC WORKS ASSN • WAHL d WAHL PACE LAB INC ITEM DESCRIPTION DUES SERV CONT CONT SERV ACCOUNT NO. INV. 10-4204-240-24 10-4288-140-14 26-4200-689-68 10-20-8 AGE 25 • P.O. • MESSAGE 1694 1395I 268.00 • 293825 10/I5/86 71.40 NS CONCRETE COMP GEN SUPPLIES 40-4504-812-80 37634 71.40 293826 10/I5/86 75.00 BRAEMAR CITY OF DUES 28-4204-708-70 17 75.00 • - 12� 293827 10/I5/86 40.59 UM BARBER REFUND 40-3525-000-00 40.59 sssssv -- ***-CKS 293831 293831 10/I5/86 10/I5/86 328.50 42.00 --- ERIC-ANDERSON ERIC ANDERSON CONTSER MILEAGE 10-4200-5I0 -51 10-4208-510-5I 1"7 2 370.50 • 293832 10/I5/86 52.12 QUALITY REFRID INC CONT REPAIRS 27-4248-661-66 52.12 • 3! 293833 10/15/86 9.00 ISIA GEN SUPPLIES 28-4504-708-70 9.00 • 133 293834 10/15/86 325.00 DEBE HENSEL PROFESSIONAL SERV 293834 10/15/86 325.00- DIBE HENSEL CORRECTION 10-2235-000-00 �'^493834 10/15/86 325.00 DIBE HENSEL PROF SERVICES 28-2235-000-00 325.60 293835 10/15/86 202.73 J ZITTEL GREENHOUSE GEN SUPP 10-4504-390-30 40 202.73 29-384- 6 10/I5/86 54,802.98 MCNAMARA CONTRACTING PAYUMENT 60-2040-000-00 54,802.98 111 93837 10/15/86 201,958.24 BURY & CARLSON PAYMENT 0- -E040-000-00 6 201,958.24 • 47 293838 10/15/86 -57,186.90 D L R CONSTRUCTION PAYMENT 6040-000-00 5i,486.90-• 0-2 * so 31 293839 10/15/86 6,632.33 J P NOREX INC PAYMENT 60-2040-000-00 12 6,632.33 • 293840 10/15/86 IS,- 686.87 C 8 MCCROSSAN PAYMENT 60-2040-000-00 55 0 5G'l 1 11 4! ;x_2938- 4.1 - -,- 10/15/86 0� P-5 29-17—MIDWEST ASP - H A L T_ ----------PAY-HENT --60-20--4- 0-000-00 1986 CITY OF EDINA ,1 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT _- 8,529.07 - -- -37.79 - 1.52 _ .01 _ 95.67 .48 1.92 - 137.39 100.00 100.00 • 94.50 94.50 • -- 293842 —V 10/15/86 — — I3 293842 10/15/86 R ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O._ 0_ MESSAGE_________ 10/15/86 FUND _293842__ 293842 10/15/86 R 293842 10/15/86 9 293842 10/15/86 1 293843 10/15/86 d T TELEPHONE 26 -4256- 689 -68 _ AT s••sss TELEPHONE 27- 4256- 661 -66 296579 10/10/86 12 1 28- 4256 - 708 -70 AT AMOUNT _- 8,529.07 - -- -37.79 - 1.52 _ .01 _ 95.67 .48 1.92 - 137.39 100.00 100.00 • 94.50 94.50 • WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE CEN SUPPLY 298492 10%14/86 107.18 SOUTHDALE'FORD • ;asss ', -- — � �o J4 I„ 'S a I4' 45 nR •s ,4 53 V �9 107.18 • CHECK REGISTER 10 -20 -66 PACE 26 465,940.80 $ VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O._ 0_ MESSAGE_________ 1 0.00 FUND 15 TOTAL AT 9 T TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 510 -51 AT 9 T TELEPHONE 23- 4256- 611 -61 AT d T TELEPHONE 26 -4256- 689 -68 _ AT d T TELEPHONE 27- 4256- 661 -66 AT 6 T TELEPHONE 28- 4256 - 708 -70 AT d T TELEHONE 50- 4256- 821 -82 - -- _ _— 90,577.42 _ FUND 50 _ TOTAL HAROLD SWANSON POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 420 -42 TOTAL 306,699.00 FUND ••• -CKS WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE CEN SUPPLY 298492 10%14/86 107.18 SOUTHDALE'FORD • ;asss ', -- — � �o J4 I„ 'S a I4' 45 nR •s ,4 53 V �9 107.18 • 465,940.80 $ FUND 10 TOTAL 1 0.00 FUND 15 TOTAL — — __ - - -_ 3,601.40 FUND 23 _ TOTAL 4,522.03 FUND 26 TOTAL 31,167.00 FUND 27 TOTAL 9,360.48 FUND 28 TOTAL 472.01 FUND 29 TOTAL 22,850. 63 FUND 40 TOTAL - -- _ _— 90,577.42 _ FUND 50 _ TOTAL 427,235.00 FUND 60 TOTAL 306,699.00 FUND 63 TOTAL 316.72 FUND 66 _ TOTAL 1,36a,839.39- TOTAL REPAIR PARTS GENERAL FUND WORKING CAPITA_L_FUND ART CENTER 10 -4504- 301 -30 46620 •••-CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 128576 - - - -t•• -CKS - SWIMMING POOL FUND GOLF COURSE FUND _ - Hand- .typed - checks - -# -73278 thru 73302 - -- -- RECREATION CENTER FUND Computer checks # 73775 thru 74053 GUN RANGE FUND UTILITY FUND LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND — CONSTRUCTION FUND IMP BOND REDEMPTION FUN _D IMP BOND REDEMPTION-62- - - -- 1,362,M_.49 - - - . _ ... - - . 1. A/'PrQYE� rCR PAYMENT i. 0N`Clc itCGi9TER V,1TEDL�� �c - PAGES / f" c.i I 1986 CITY 00 EDINA DATE CHECK REGISTER 09 -30 -86 PAGE 1 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P_0_A_ MESSAGE _,_ - z .248430 09/18/86 23,447.21 PERA ED ' CITY CONT 10- 4145 - 510 -51 MANUAL °^ I< I' " 252138 10/03/86 23,447 _21 t ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL si ° ii #stt 5.33- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL t#t -CKS , 0/03/86— 25.08- PHILLIPS. SOCIAL SECURITY 10-4149- 510 -51 MANUAL 252138 248523 09/16/86 10,145.53 EMP CONT ° -•___. MANUAL _ 10,145.53 s 252138 10/03/86 13.27- ED �„ 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL e, �I 252138 10/03/86 2__7.99- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842784 MANUAL I� 252138 10/03/86 6.48- ED'PHILLIPS I" 248701 09/18/86 339.60 D_O.E.-R - - - - -- EMP CONT 10 -4162- 510 -51 - MANUAL.. —I" . a MANUAL 339.130-0 _ 252138 10/03/86 _ED �, ;, h #sit 252138 10/03/86 47.53- CKSti PHILLIPS lie MANUAL .�" 252138 10/03/86 14.63- ED PHILLIPS " 252067 09/18/86 76.25 CAPITAL CITY INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -64 MANUAL PHILLIPS :r MANUAL, MANUAL li 76.25 i 252138 10/03/86 1,399.28 ED PHILLIPS �Iza MANUAL �" ssisii - itt -CKS ILI -2 252135 09/18/86 1.40- EAGLE WINE DISCOUNT 50 -3710- 003 -00 MANUAL -'' f_252135 252135 10/03/86 12.70- EAGLE WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 1''' 10/03/86 17_ 63- __ EAGLE_WINE 50- 371 -0- 822-82 MANUAL- - —I�-' 252135 10/03/86 65.40- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL � -' 252135 10/03/66 20.05- EAGLE WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL �z' 252135 10/03/86 _ 60.93 - —47-.'7S-­­EAGLE EAGLE WINE — — 50- 3710 - 862 -86. MANUAL 252138 10/03/86 EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862-86 MANUAL 252135 10/03/86 634.98 EAGLE WINE 50-4626- 822 -82 MANUAL :• 252135 10/03/86 3,273.16 EAGLE WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 252135 10/03/86 3,046.50 EAGLE WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL z 252135 10/03/86 881.26 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL ;• 252135___ - -1 0/03/86 _ -- -- 1, 002.44. - -EAGLE WINE _ .�_ ^_ _ ___._..- ...._..._. 50- 4628 - 842-84 .-_ - - --`- -- ._.._._._. MANUAL 252135 10/03/86 2,387.37 EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL .I'rtl 252135 09/18/86 107.80 EAGLE WINE INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 822 -82 MANUAL {' 252135 09/18/86 49.88 EAGLE WINE INVENTORY_ 50-4632- 842 -84 MANUAL____,' 252135 09/18/86 69.80 EAGLE NINE INVENTORY 50 -4632- 862 -86 MANUAL 11,227.33 # I" A s # # # ## t #t -CKS ' - 252138 10/03/86 2_0._00- ED ' PHILLIPS_ 50- 3700_- 842_ -84 MANUAL °^ 252138 10/03/86 4.32 - ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 252138 10/03/86 5.33- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 41 252138 0/03/86— 25.08- PHILLIPS. 50 -3710- 822 -82, MANUAL ,, 252138 _1 10/03/86 19.72- _ED_ ED 4__ PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 -•___. MANUAL _ -;" 252138 10/03/86 13.27- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL e, �I 252138 10/03/86 2__7.99- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842784 MANUAL I� 252138 10/03/86 6.48- ED'PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 842 -84 _ MANUAL �"M1 -� 252138 10/03/86 18.17- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL -''_ _ 252138 10/03/86 _ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84_ MANUAL 252138 10/03/86 47.53- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL .�" 252138 10/03/86 14.63- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL �,1 '� 2521,38 252138 10/03/86 10/03/86 53_.14- 985.77 ED_PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 4626- 822-82 MANUAL, MANUAL li -"a �1 252138 10/03/86 1,399.28 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL �" 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -30 -86 PAGE 2 I —CHECK _NO—DATE__.._ AMOUNT _____VENDOR_ _ ^____ ITEM. DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT _NO_INY__j_P_._O_A_MESSAGE__._ 252138 10/03/86 2,656.84 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL , 252138 ____ 1 0/03/86. _ 216. 00 ED PHILLIPS �`.�__._ .50- 4628— S22 -82 +' — __ MANUAL .'_. 252138 10/03/86 1,254.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL ; ✓' 252138 10/03/86 266.30 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 25LI138 10/03/86 _._00 ED PHILLIPS — 50 -4628- 842 -84 -MANUAL C' 252138 10/03/86 324.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL ° 252138 10/03/86 663.47 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL I 252138 ___ 10/03/86__ 908.35 ED.PHILLIPS _ 50- 4628 - 842- 84- _ —_ —___ MANUAL____,_' 252138 10/03/86 1,045.00 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL � 252138 10/03/86 731.50 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 252138 1- 0/03/86 2,376.65 ED_- PHILLIPS : 50= 4628-862 -86 MANUAL I'I 252138 09/18/86 25.30 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 822 -82 MANUAL 12,575.90 + + ++ ++ +•+ -CKS Iz� r ' _ 252354 09/18/86 67_05 MINNEGASCO_ _ HEAT 10- 4254 - 446_ -44 MANUAL_ —._l 252354 09/18/86 48.29 MINNEGASCO HEAT 10 -4254- 520 -S2 MANUAL y�_' 252354 09/18/86 202.23 MINNEGASCO HEAT 10- 4254 - 540 -54 MANUAL �.7i ._._ 2S23S4__v 09/18/86 __ __6.99 __ MINNEGASCO__ __• —_ HEAT____ 10- 4254 - 629 -62_ __ —_._._ _. MANUAL j' 252354 09/18/86 66.39 MINNEGASCO HEAT 10- 4254 - 646 -64 MANUAL 252354 09/18/86 8.95 MINNEGASCO HEAT 23- 4254 - 611 -61 MANUAL 252354 09/18/86_ 03- MINNEGASCO CORRECTION 26- 4254- 689 -68 _MANUAL____. 252354 09/18/86 1,145.92 MINNEGASCO HEAT 26- 4254 - 689 -68 MANUAL 252354 09/18/86 1,145.92- MINNEGASCO CORRECTION 26- 4254-689 -68 MANUAL I•' 252354__ _09/18/86___ _1_,_145.95 MINNEGASCO. HEAT 26- 4254 - 689 -6B ____._. MANUAL 252354 09/18/86 21.31 MINNEGASCO HEAT 27- 4254 - 661 -66 MANUAL 252354 09/18/86 36.02 MINNEGASCO HEAT 27- 4254 - 662 -66 MANUAL 252354 09/18/86 2 ,-009_. 13 MINNEGASCO HEAT 28- 4254 - 708 -70 ____MANUAL 252354 09/18/86 34.20 MINNEGASCO HEAT 40 -4254- 801 -80 MANUAL ;M 252354 09/18/86 193.68 MINNEGASCO HEAT 40- 4254 - 803 -80 MANUAL 252354 __09/18/86 MINNEGASCO._ HEAT -- 50-4254- 821 -82 _._____.._.....__._. MANUAL ; 252354 09/18/86 2.98- MINNEGASCO CORRECTION 50- 4254 - 821 -82 MANUAL y " 252354 09/18/86 2.98 MINNEGASCO HEAT 50- 4254 - 821 -82 MANUAL __252354 09/18/86 _15, 00 MINNEGASCO HEAT ____5 0-4254-841-84 MANUAL I.. 252354 09/18/86 15.87 MINNEGASCO HEAT 50 -4254- 861 -86 MANUAL �r 'I 3,874.01 + !e it +++ -CKS 252391• 09/18/86 628..91. NORTHERN STATES__ _ELECTRIC 10- 1130 - 009_00 MANUAL.T_I�i 252391 09/18/86 894.14 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10 -4252- 301 -30 MANUAL 252391 09/18/86 13,118.73 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10 -4252- 321 -30 MANUAL i. 252391_ 09/18/86 _ Y09/18/86 10,183.1.0. __ NORTHERN_STATES ELECTRIC 10 -4252- 322 -30.� J� MANUAL I'ryl 252391 2,503.36 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 330 -30 MANUAL ar 252391 09/18/86 293.99 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10 -4252- 345 -30 MANUAL -, ___252391 09/18/86._ 104_46 --NORTHERN ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 358 -30 ! MANUAL.___._�•f I_ 252391 09/18/86 2,012.72 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 375 -30 MANUAL 252391 09/18/86 43.32 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10 -4252- 460 -46 MANUAL Iw,l 252391____09/18/S6._ 1,638.51 NORTHERN STATES - _ELECTRIC._ _10- MANUAL e 252391 09/18/86 1,607.54 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 540 -54 MANUAL 252391 09/18/86 922.77 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 629 -62 MANUAL 252391 09/18/86 31011_.71 NORTHERN STATES A MANUAL 252391 09/18/86 394.88 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 23 -4252- 611 -61 MANUAL ° 252391 09/18/86 1,305.05 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 26 -4252- 689 -68 - MANUAL - '"� _ 1986 OF EDINA CHECK ISTER 09 -30 -8, ,AGE ----.--CHECK NO. DATE _ AMOUNT ^ _ _ VENDOR ITEM_. DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO_INV. 0 P 0 _*_MESSAGE i F- r' I 252435 252391 09/18/86 2,599.73 NORTHERN STATES 252435 _ 252391 09/18/86 _ 219.04 -_ NORTHERN_STATES CO i;�252391 10/03/86 09/18/86 4,392.39 NORTHERN STATES ' 252391 09/18/86 226.38 NORTHERN STATES 252435 _2S2391 09/18/86 2,618.60 _NORTHERN_ STATES J 252391 09/18/66 24,847.88 NORTHERN STATES " 252391 09/18/86 35.98 NORTHERN STATES 252435 252391-__ _09/18/86 _ _ 713.69_ _ NORTHERN_ STATES WINE 252391 09/18/86 1,324.23 NORTHERN STATES WINE 252391 09/18/86 523.40 NORTHERN STATES WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 252451 76, 164.51 • 2,130.54 QUALITY WINE TWIN _ 252451 10103/86 _ QUALITY i F- r' I 252435 10/03/86 1.87- PRIOR WINE CO 252435 10/03/86 5.00- PRIOR WINE CO ___252435 10/03/86 6.21- PRIOR WINE CO 252435 10/03/86 13.37- PRIOR WINE CO 252435 10/03/86 93.65 PRIOR WINE CO 252435 10/03/86 �� a 250.00 -PRIOR _WINE MANUAL 252435 10/03/86 310.61 PRIOR WINE _CO CO 252435 10/03/86 668.58 PRIOR WINE CO -i ELECTRIC 27 -4252- 661 -66 MANUAL I; ELECTRIC_ 27- 4252 - 662- 66___._________ _ MANUAL ELECTRIC 28- 4252 - 708 -70 MANUAL " 252451 10/03/86 11.69- QUALITY WINE •'^ ELECTRIC 252451 10/03/86 12.50- QUALITY WINE ELECTRIC.Y 50- 4252 - 821. -82- 252451 10/03/86 16.45- QUALITY WINE 50- 4252 - 861 -86 MANUAL {,I 252451 10/03/86, .72- QUALITY WINE MANUAL ° 252451 10/03/86 42.57- QUALITY WINE j 50- 3710 - 842 -84 252451_ 10/03/86 252540 QUALITY WINE TWIN 252451 10/03/86 30.42- QUALITY WINE 252540 252451 10/03/86 585.83 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 252451 10/03/86 2,130.54 QUALITY WINE TWIN _ 252451 10103/86 3,592.27 QUALITY _ WINE 252540 252451 10/03/86 11250.20 QUALITY WINE 50- 371.0- 862 -86 252451 10/03/86 1,645_00 QUALITY WINE TWIN CITY 252451 10/03/86 72.25 QUALITY WINE s ' 7.50- ' 252451 10/03/86 3,052.34 QUALITY WINE 12,142.29 • -i ELECTRIC 27 -4252- 661 -66 MANUAL I; ELECTRIC_ 27- 4252 - 662- 66___._________ _ MANUAL ELECTRIC 28- 4252 - 708 -70 MANUAL " ELECTRIC 29- 4252 - 721 -72 MANUAL , ELECTRIC 40- 4252 - 801 -80 ELECTRIC - 40 -4252- 803 -80 _MANUAL_ MANUAL ELECTRIC 40- 4252 - 804 -80 MANUAL ELECTRIC.Y 50- 4252 - 821. -82- MANUAL__.,'.'_ ELECTRIC 50- 4252 - 841 -84 MANUAL I' ELECTRIC 50- 4252 - 861 -86 MANUAL {,I 8.48- TWIN *so-CKS : d 50- 3710- 822 -82 -' MANUAL 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL_ �,•� 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL I, 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628_- 842 -64 _ _MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL j °,1 0*0*w* **• -CKS • *• -CKS 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL J 50- _3710= 842 -84 _ MANUAL 1 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL ,J 50-3710-862-86 _ _ MANUAL _ 50- 3710 - 862 -66 MANUAL 50- 4626-822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 1 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL__ 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL ^ °,1 0*0*w* **• -CKS • I ,y 252540 10/03/86 2.72- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 622 -82 MANUAL ° 252540 10/03/86 1.86- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 252540 10/03/86 61__17- TWIN _CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -_82_ MANUAL 252540 10/03/86 8.48- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL ° I 252540 10/03/86 66.87- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 252540 10/03/86 TWIN CITY__WINE _. 50 -3710- 842 -84 _ MANUAL 252540 10/03/86 6.05- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 252540 10/03/86 .51- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 252540 10/03/86 35_.20- TWIN -CITY WINE_ 50- 371.0- 862 -86 MANUAL! 252540 10103/86 15.06- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL "= 252540 10/03/86 7.50- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL • I ,y 14,658.27 252700 10/03/86 3.28- WORLD CLASS WINES +f ,I .. _,- _252709 t_0. /0 /8.6_ 218-.80_ WORLD CLASS- WINES_- _ 215.52 • + I 1986 CITY OF EDINA - ?'I 252722 CHECK REGISTER 09 -30 -86 PAGE 4 f ti ___CHECK..N0_DATE___. 254053 09/18/86 AMOUNT_ _..VENDOR.. _- ITEM_. DESCRIPTION -_ ACCOUN .T- NO,__INV_-_.M- .P_._O_.__i .MESSAGE..__-__ - ____09/18/86 22.00 252540 10/03/86 3.15- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 200.00 254053 09/18/86 252540 _____- 10/03/86___- x10..167 _-_.TWIN CITY. WINE .50 -3710- 862 -86 -__ __ MANUAL__..._ I; _ �° 254053 252540 10/03/86 2.73- TWIN CITY WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL ' 252540 10/03/86 8.32- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL ___252540_ 10/03/86. 3,058.54_ _.TWIN CITY. WINE_ - - -._ 50- 4626.- 822 -82. ._.MANUAL- .____.'_, 252540 10/03/86 3,343.67 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 252540 09/18/86 150.78 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50- 4626-862 -86 MANUAL cl + _ 252540 -_ _10/03/86 - __1...759.88_ ____TWIN, CITY WINE___�_ -____� .50- 4626- 862 -86 -_ __MANUAL 252540 10/03/86 753.10 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 252540 10/03/86 185.80 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL _ 252540- 10/03/86 _272.70 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628-822 -82 MANUAL.____.I 252540 10/03/86 605.48 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL i . I 252540 10/03/86 673.98 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 2S2540 10/03/86 ___ 848.46____ - TWIN CITY WINE.. _ 50- 4628- 842- 84__._______. _..... MANUAL 252540 10/03/86 1,017.17 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 -MANUAL 252540 10/03/86 272.70 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 252540._ 10/03/86 _51,45 TWIN CITY WINE_._- _ 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL ___._._'; I' 252540 10/03/86 752.93 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL +; 252540 10/03/86 632.61 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL =' ,- .252540 __ _1_0/03/86_ 315.54 __ -_.. TWIN_.CITY -WINE_ _ S.O�b28-.862= 86 MANUAL . 14,658.27 252700 10/03/86 3.28- WORLD CLASS WINES +f ,I .. _,- _252709 t_0. /0 /8.6_ 218-.80_ WORLD CLASS- WINES_- _ 215.52 • + I 255078 09/18/86 255078 09/18/86 ® trrttr s� 300.00 POSTMASTER 30_0_._00 s __•__ 42.00 itt_tis -- - ?'I 252722 09/18/86 _ 51 .45 __ BRAEMAR GOLF-- - "I 254053 09/18/86 257.40 254053 09/18/86 75.00 _ 254053.. ____09/18/86 22.00 254053 09/18/86 69.71 254053 09/18/86 L -__ 254053_09/1 a/86 200.00 254053 09/18/86 + 254053 09/18/86 1,046.58 t 2S4053 09/18/86 482.95 254053 09/18/86 COCA COLA 254053 09/18/86 27- 4624- 664 -66 MANUAL i ,� , tstrrt 255078 09/18/86 255078 09/18/86 ® trrttr s� 300.00 POSTMASTER 30_0_._00 s __•__ 42.00 BRAEMAR GOLF 147.00 BRAEMAR GOLF _ 51 .45 __ BRAEMAR GOLF-- - 118.94 BRAEMAR GOLF 257.40 BRAEMAR GOLF 75.00 __ BRAEMAR GOLF 22.00 BRAEMAR GOLF 69.71 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY BRAEMAR GOLF 200.00 BRAEMAR GOLF 56.43 BRAEMAR GOLF 1,046.58 t 27- 4540- 660 -66 .__ __ 482.95 COCA COLA 618.80 COCA COLA POSTAGE -- - -srts- CKS - - --� 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL �•' 50= 462.8= 8E2-_82 _MANUAL tt -CKS 10 -4290- 510 -51 MANUAL srts -CKS PETTY CASH 27 -3420- 000 -00 MANUAL PETTY CASH 27- 4120 - 663 -66 MANUAL --PETTY ,CASH 27- 4120- 664. -66 _ _ _ MANUAL PETTY CASH 2T- 4120 - 671 -66 MANUAL PETTY CASH 27- 4120 - 672 -66 MANUAL A PETTY.CASH 27- 4236 - 661 -66 MANUAL PETTY CASH 27 -4290- 660 -66 MANUAL PETTY CASH 27 -4S16- 660-66 MANUAL _ PETTY.. CASH.,.--.,---- 27- 4540- 660 -66 .__ _ _._.___.... MANUAL PETTY CASH 27- 4620- 661 -66 MANUAL PETTY CASH 27- 4624- 664 -66 MANUAL INVENTORY INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822 -82 - - - -- SO- 4632- 842 -84 000-CK 8 MANUAL _ MANUAL try -CK G: I ,I 111 3 I�� . 1986 OF EDINA CHECK NO- nATF AP10"NT CHECK ASTER urmnno TTcm nwaP0T0VTnU 09-30-86 .-AGE 5 Appd%lluv un futi a n A A .C­- 2S9129 10/03/86 1., S63. 00 E59129 10/03/86 1,420.00 e59129 10/03/86 2,209.77 7,208.77 • 0/03/86 - 60.08 - ' 259135 10/03/86 8.97- 259135 10/03/86 12.76- 259135 10i63/86 30.96- 259135 10/03/86 107.66- —BELLBOY 50- 4626 - 842 -84 _ __ _ MANUAL BELLBOY 50-4626-842-84 MANUAL "I BELLBOY 50-4626-662-86 MANUAL •**-CKS EAGLE WINE 50-3710-822-82 MANUAL EAGLE WINE 50-3710-842-84 MANUAL EAGLE WINE 50-371 - 0-842-84 MANUAL EAGLE WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 4,314t40.KUEj_"ER DIST tNVEN ORY MANUAL 4,314.40 000-CKS- 255378 09/18/86 81156.65 MARK VII INVENTORY 50-4630-862-86 MANUAL 8, 156.65 ***-CKS 25576-0 - 09/18/86 596.00 DAY DIST INVENTORY 50-4630-862-86 MANUAL 596.00 • 255701 09/18/86 75.00 75.00 • MN GOV FIN OFFICERS CONFERENCE 10-4202-160-16 MANUAL 255702 09/18/86 56.00 ARROUWOOD RADISSON CONFERENCE 10-4202-160-16 MANUAL- 56.00 ••• -CKS _ 259067 10/03/86 _— Go- CAPITAL CITY DISTRI MANUAL 259067 I 0i 63/86 147.24 CAPITAL CITY D ISTRI -SOc-37107--862-86 S-4iii-see-82 MANUAL 259067 10/03/86 5.40 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50-4628-822-82 MANUAL 77 259067 __es§oii 10/03/86 _loio3A6 3.00 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50-4628-842nQ4 MANUAL 102.00 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50-4628-842-84 MANUAL 259067 10/03/86 10.50 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50 -4628-862-86 MANUAL 259067 10/03/86 _09/18/86• 341.85 _ CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50 -4628-862-86 MANUAL 259667 86.50 CAPITAL CITY INVENTORY 50-4630-822-82 MANUAL 259067 09/18/86 45.75- CAPITAL CITY CORRECTION 50-4630-862-86 MANUAL 259067 -- 09/18/86 - -_ 4S.75 -- CAPITA — L _q CITY I — INVENTORY — 50-4630-862-86 259067 09/18/86 45.75 CAPITAL CITY INVENTORY —_MANUAL 50-4630-862-86 MANUAL 741.64 • ••0-CKS E59078 09/18/86 890.30 890.30 • COKE INVENTORY 50-4632-862 -06 _MANUAL -CKS 259129 10/03/86 2,016.00 BELLBOY 50-4626-922-82 MANUAL 2S9129 10/03/86 1., S63. 00 E59129 10/03/86 1,420.00 e59129 10/03/86 2,209.77 7,208.77 • 0/03/86 - 60.08 - ' 259135 10/03/86 8.97- 259135 10/03/86 12.76- 259135 10i63/86 30.96- 259135 10/03/86 107.66- —BELLBOY 50- 4626 - 842 -84 _ __ _ MANUAL BELLBOY 50-4626-842-84 MANUAL "I BELLBOY 50-4626-662-86 MANUAL •**-CKS EAGLE WINE 50-3710-822-82 MANUAL EAGLE WINE 50-3710-842-84 MANUAL EAGLE WINE 50-371 - 0-842-84 MANUAL EAGLE WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -30 -86 PAGE ITEM_DESCRIP_TION ACCOUNT _.NO. -INV_._- _-CHECK_NO�DATE___ -____ _ -- -- --� AMOUNT___ - _ _ ..__..VENDOR__ -- J -- - -__ -_ MANUAL 259135 10/03/86 3,004.07 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 642 -84 \� ; 259135 ._1 0/03/86 _._ -- _.1 -, 548...14 ___ _ -__ EAGLE WINE•____..-...._ - f `�; 259135 10/03/86 5,383.14 EAGLE WINE '1 MANUAL.____' ^; 259135 10/03/86 344.22- EAGLE WINE MANUAL t _.259135 - -- 50 -371 0- 822 -82 10/03/86 637.75 EAGLE WINE_ �k 259135 10/03/66 -__._ 448.56 _ EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 842 784 MANUAL __ _•ss -CKS �,, 50- 3710 - 862 -86 10,457.01 • 09/18/86 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL ,.. s•••ss -_ MANUAL MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 259138_ _10/03/86 _ 19.50- _ ED PHILLIPS- 50- 4626- 842 -84 2S9138 10/03/86 29.26- ED PHILLIPS -_ 259138 10/03/86 23.20- ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 259138.__ - 10/03/86.- - .2.12- . ED PHILLIPS___ - �' �. 259138 10/03/86 52.33- ED PHILLIPS MANUAL I, 50- 4628- 862 -86 259138 10/03/86 5.08- ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 - 2!5913610/03/86 50- 4628- 862 -86 17.09- ED PHILLIPS_ - PRIOR WINE 259138 10/03/86 20.54- ED PHILLIPS �I- 509.70 259138 10/03/86 19.50 ED PHILLIPS _.259138 10/03/86_ -__- __.66.58- __ED_PHILLIPS—_ 79 259138 10/03/86 19.50- ED PHILLIPS ' 259138 10/03/86 19.50- ED PHILLIPS 2591.38 10/03/86 1� 462.78_ T ED PHILLIPS- _ 259138 10/03/86 854.62 ED PHILLIPS 259138 10/03/86 3,328.75 ED PHILLIPS 259138 10/03/86._ 975.00. Y ED_PHILLIPS_ __ 259138 10/03/86 105.75 ED PHILLIPS 259138 10/03/86 1,159.75 ED PHILLIPS 259138_ 10/03/86__ 2,616.45 ED PHILLIPS,_.__ - 259138 10/03/86 253.80 ED PHIlLIP3 i 259138 10/03/86 969.00 ED PHILLIPS 259138 _ -- 10/03/86 975.00_ ED.PHILLIPS________ 259138 10/03/86 6.00- ED PHILLIPS r 259138 10/03/86 6.00 ED PHILLIPS 259138 10/03/86 96900- ED_ PHILLIPS 259138 10%03/86 1,027.00 ED PHILLIPS r 12,503.70 • ITEM_DESCRIP_TION ACCOUNT _.NO. -INV_._- 8_P_.O- #_.MESSAGE -_.__ -____ _ -- -- --� 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL - .50- 4626 - 842 -84 -- - -__ -_ MANUAL •s• -CKS 50-4626- 862 -86 MANUAL ry 50- 4628 - 642 -84 MANUAL INVENTORY0�463E 50- 4628 - 842 -84 _ - - -_ MANUAL__. 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 57.48 • •s• -CKS " 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL.____' ^; 50 -3710- 822 -62 MANUAL " 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL I� - -- 50 -371 0- 822 -82 _ -_ .__ _ MANUAL.-,--- 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842 784 MANUAL __ _•ss -CKS �,, 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 09/18/86 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL ,.. 50- 3710- 862- 86._._.— -_ MANUAL MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50-4626- 822-82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL I -�- -_ MANUAL ._ ••• -CKS I -- 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 10/03/86 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 -...-MANUAL - MANUAL 50-4628- 842 -84 MANUAL �. 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL WINE —.50-4628-862-86-- ____ __..__ ___ MANUAL MANUAL I, 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 10/03/86 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL i. 50- 4628- 862 -86 __MANUAL MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 10/03/86 - - - s••s•• -- -____ _ -- -- --� -- - •s• -CKS ___ 259190 09/18/86 57_48__ GRIG63_COOPER___,_ INVENTORY0�463E =�E -84 57.48 • s•s••• �_ -_ __ _•ss -CKS �,, M' ,259251 09/18/86 650,000.00 EDINA HRA DUE HRA 10- 1145 - 000 -00 MANUAL 6SO 000.00 v •••••• ••• -CKS I -- 259435 10/03/86 2.34- PRIOR WINE CO -- 50 -3710- 842 -84 - MANUAL e, 259435 10/03/86 10.19- PRIOR WINE CO 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL I, _- 259435 10/03/86 1_ 56- PRIOR-WINE-CO S073710-862-86. MANUAL 259435 10/03/86 116.97 PRIOR WINE CO 50 -4628- 842 -84 -_" MANUAL '3 259435 10/03/86 509.70 PRIOR WINE CO 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL �a 79 1986 OF EDINA CHECK .ISTER 09 -30 -8e eAGE 7 • CHECK NO. DATE --- ___ .- AMOUNT _ ___ __ VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION_,-__!_ _ACCOUNT NO._.INV._ A P- .0._.• MESSAGE �• 259435 10/03/86 11.40- PRIOR WINE CO 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 259435 10/03/86 77.98 PRIOR _WINE CO - 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 679.16 s s *s *ss ** *-CKS. 259451 10/03/86 1.30- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 259451 10/03/86 64.33 - -. _ -_ -- QUALITY WINE _ —_ 50- 3710 - 822-82 MANUAL 259451 10/03/86 69.32- QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 259451 10/03/86 14.29- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 259451 10/03/86 _ __ __ 27.00- QUALITY WINE _ _ _ __50-3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 259451 10/03/86 3,221.83 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL ~ 259451 10/03/86 3,469.57 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 259451 10/03/86 _1,353.27 .- QUALITY WINE _ - __. _- _ 50- 4626 - 862 -86 _. _ - MANUAL 259451 10/03/86 131.35 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL • 259451 10/03/86 1,433.30 QUALITY WINE SO- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 9,433.08 • *s * * ** *s* -CKS 259540 10/03/86 44.50- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 259540 10/03/86 164.50— TWIN CITY WINE 50 -3700- 842 -84 MANUAL 259540 10/03/86 — — 78.00 — TWIN CITY WINE _ — — — — — 50 -3700- 862- 86 MANUAL 259540 10/03/86 .86— TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 259540 10/03/86 1.39— TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 259540 _ 10/03/86 _ _ 29.74— _ _ TWIN CITY WINE _ _ 50- 3710- 822 -02 ..__. MANUAL 259540 10/03/86 7.53— TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 259540 10/03/86 2.08— TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 259540 10/03/86 5.S3— TWIN CITY WINE _ _________S0-3710-822-82 MANUAL 259540 10/03/86 15.06— TWIN CITY WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL lb F 259540 10/03/86 4.75— TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 259540 10/03/86 15.84— TWIN CITY WINE _ ..., -_ - -, - _ -_ _ 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 259540 10/03/86 12.40— TWIN CITY WINE - 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 259540 10/03/86 .21 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL t 259540 10/03/86 _ S6.36— TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 259540 10/03/86 4.41— TWIN CITY WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 -_ _ MANUAL 259540 10/03/86 376.55 TWIN CITY WINE SO- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL c 259540 10/03/86 _ 1,48S.68 TWIN CITY WINE _ _ 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 259540 10/03/86 753.10 TWIN CITY WINE .__ 50- 4626- 842 -84 _ MANUAL 259540 10/03/86 791.90 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 259540 _ _10/03/86 _ 10.62 -- — TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4626 - 842- 847— MANUAL 259540 10/03/86 2,818.62 _ _ TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 259540 10/03/86 551.85 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 259540 _ 10/03/86 86.55 -_.. _ TWIN CITY WINE _ - _ 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 259540 10/03/86 139.53 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 259540 10/03/86 .00 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 259540 10/03/86 207.32_ TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 259540 10/03/86 475.00 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4625- 842 -84 MANUAL 259540 10/03/86 1,241.65 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 259540 10/03/86 _ - __. .00 TWIN CITY WINE _ 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 259540 10/03/86 .00 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 259540 10/03/86 441.20 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL - - -- 8,915.59.. _59, « - - - -- • * *ts *t t ** —CKS 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -30 -86 PAGE — CHECK_NO—DA_T_E AMOUNT_ —.- _VENDOR— _- _..._ - " - -. -ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT-NO- NV_w_A_k.O__M MESSAGE.- - Z I. 259700_ __10/03/86 894.80.._ -WORLD CLASS WINES 50- 4628- 842 -84 ___MANUAL �° 259700 10/03/86 894 80- WORLD CLASS WINES ' ' 259700 259700_ 10/03/86 905.25 WORLD CLASS WINES 50 -4628- 842 -84 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL __ 10/03/86 1 0.-45 WORLD CLASS WINES------- 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL j" 259700 10/03/86 10.45 WORLD CLASS WINES 50 -4628- 842 -84 _ MANUAL 259700 10/03/86 10.45- WORLD CLASS WINES 50-4628- 842 -84 MANUAL I - -- -- -- -- - - - -- -- - --- 9.1.5_. 70. ± _-- 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL + ++ -CKS -- - - - - -- _ .._.._..___ � 09/22/86- -- _1.60 9� -L0 _00 -. 1 ST-SOUTHDALE_— ._— _- �---- - -• - -- -- -OF_ I" s+ssss PORTION 0-3357_- 000 -00 MANUAL 262095 + ++ -CKS n I 000000 000 -CKS I 1 ,e • �ff 262091 09/22/86 100.00 CITY OF EDINA TRANSFER 10- 1139 - 000 -00 MANUAL 50,118.31 s 100.00 + r 262174 09/22/86 160,000.00 1ST SOUTHDALE BANK TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL + ++ -CKS ',26209509/22/86 09/22/86- -- _1.60 9� -L0 _00 -. 1 ST-SOUTHDALE_— BANK TRANSFER— 166._13 _COMM -OF_ REVENUE ._-_—. CITY PORTION 0-3357_- 000 -00 MANUAL 262095 09/22/86 12.35 COMM OF REVENUE CITY PORTION 23- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL r 262095 09/22/86 460.97 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 26 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL MANUAL 262095 ..-- 09/e2/86.. 8,596.34_ __ COMM- OF- REVENUE STATE SALES.-TAX-27-3357-000-00—.------.---- MANUAL MANUAL 262391 09/22/86 262095 09/22/86 30.33 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 28- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL y BELL 262095 09/22/86 92.62 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 29- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 10 -4256- 628 -_62 MANUAL 262095_ 09/22/86 2,.061..04 .— COMM -COMM OF REVENUE ---.STATE.-SALES--TAX TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 646 -64 - 40- 3357-000 -00 MANUAL..___] 262391 262095 09/22/86 8,140.22 BELL OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 50 -3357- 001 -00 MANUAL 60.25 262095 262095 09/22/86 n 9/22/86 151901.50 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 50- 3357- 002 -00 .1 MANUAL I 000000 000 -CKS I 1 ,e • �ff 4, 656.81. COMM OF- REVENUE - STA_T.E SALES -AX s0r3'�SL0.03 -0.0. - MANUAL 50,118.31 s r 262174 09/22/86 160,000.00 1ST SOUTHDALE BANK TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL ._- 262174 _ 09/22/86- -- _1.60 9� -L0 _00 -. 1 ST-SOUTHDALE_— BANK TRANSFER— .50- .1910- 000-_00_ - MANUAL - -- .00 s —. sss -CKS 1 262391 09/22/86 60.25 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 10 -4226- 160 -16 MANUAL 262391 ____09/22/86 _ -- - . T.. 85 - NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE —_ 10- 4256 - 460-46. MANUAL 262391 09/22/86 3,480.15 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 262391 09/22/86 281.25 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 10 -4256- 622 -62 MANUAL _.- _262391- 09/22/86 NORTHWESTERN BELL_ ._TELEPHONE _ 10 -4256- 628 -_62 MANUAL ;I 262391 09/22/86 42.05 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 646 -64 - - MANUAL 262391 09/22/86 155.72 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 23- 4256- 611 -61 MANUAL _ 262391 09/22/86 60.25 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE__. - -.. 26 -4256- 689 -68 MANUAL 262391 09/22/86 319.90 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 27- 4256- 661 -66 _._ _ MANUAL ' 262391 09/22/86 236.78 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 28- 4256- 708 -70 MANUAL _ 262391_ 09/22/86 30_35 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE MANUAL_ 262391 09/22/86 110.69 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 40- 4256- 801 -80 _ _ MANUAL 262391 09/22/86 268.80 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 40- 4256 - 803 -80 MANUAL 26239109/22/86.._..___ _154.66 _NORTHWESTERN BELL._ TELEPHONE 50-4256-821-82 262391 09/22/86 184.04 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 50- 4256 - 841 -84 MANUAL r + 262391 09/22/86 131.62 e c:. in . NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 50- 4256 - 861 -86 MANUAL I 000000 000 -CKS I 1 ,e • �ff 1986 . ! OF EDINA CHECK ..__.ISTER 09 -30 -8. . -AGE 9 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT - - -_ VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV,_8__P 0_ -8 _MESSAGE _ 262430 09/22/86 20,_834.27 PERA — — CITY PORTION 10 -4145- 510 -51 MANUAL. �•_ (� 20,834.27 + ' �_ rrrrrr 262523 09/22/86 10,192.47 STATE TREASURER CITY PORTION 10- 4149 - 510 -51 192. 47 - ��" srrrrr 262701 09/22/86 189.90 COMMERCIAL LIFE CITY PORTION 10- 4157 - 510 -51 189.90 s .I 262702 09/22/86 231.01 D 0 E R CITY PORTION 10 -4162- 510 -51 231.01 s o MANUAL rrr -CKS MANUAL MANUAL " 262703 09/22/86 110.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE DUE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 MANUAL - "� 110.00 s =' I --- --- - - --_. -rrr -CKS.. s 266067 10_/03/86 3.90- CAPITAL CITY DISTRI_ 50- 3700_822 -82 MANUAL 266067 10/03/86 .00 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL - �`f 266067 10/03/86 9.00 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL I. '� - __266067 - 10/03/86 -_ -- 224_85 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628 -8424 MANUAL- - : 229.95 s 1:, 1 tl rrr rrr rrr -CKS 266135 10/03/86 6.83- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 266135 10/03/86 44.52- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 266135 10/03/86 11.76- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 266135 10/03/86 96.50- EAGLE WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 266135 10/03/86 3.67- EAGLE WINE SO- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL_ 266135 10/03/86 53.00- EAGLE WINE - 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL y .. 266135 10/03/86 4,824.93 EAGLE WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL _ 266135 10/03/86 _587.65 _ EAGLE WINE _ _ — , 50- 4626- 842 -84_ -- __MANUAL I� 266135 10/03/86 2,650.01 EAGLE WINE- 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 7 266135 10/03/86 341.49 EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 266135 10/03/86 2_,_226.16 __EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84-- MANUAL_- ` 266135 10%03/86 183.50 EAGLE WINE- _ 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL r „I 10, 597.66 s r►s -CKS 266138 10/03/86 17_03- _ ED PHILLIPS - 50- 3710 - 822 -82 266138 10%03/86 3.29- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -62 — MANUAL 266138 10/03/86 30.35- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 266138 10/03/86 _ 3.29 -_ ED_ PHILLIPS _ -�- _ _- 50 -3710- 822- 82 MANUAL 266138 10/03/86 30.35 ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 266138 10/03/86 30.35- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 266138 266136 10/03/86 10/03/86 3__29 ED- PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 822 -82 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL ' 60.88- v " i 266138 10/03/86 115.07- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL s 1986 CITY OF EDINA .. CHECK _NO. DATE . —_ AMOUNT ----- - - ED PHILLIPS -Iz 266138 10/03/86 9.03- ED ' l ..... 266138 1 0/03/86 _.-- _____._ -__.._ . 88- -..—. _ ED " 266138 10/03/86 1.84- ED ' 266138 10/03/86 29.69- ED 266138 __ _10/03/86_ i , 511 .41 ED 266138 10/03/86 1,517.41 ED 266138 10/03/86 6.00 ED 266138 _ __10/03/86_____ MANUAL . -__._. 6.00- ED 266138 10/03/86 1,511.41- ED 266138 10/03/86 5,753.30 ED 266138 _ 10/03/86 - 1 ,- 484. 42_ -- ED: 266138 10/03/86 169.82 ED 266138 rl, 10/03/86 5.46 ED _ 266138 10/03/86 164.36,_ - -_ ED 266138 10/03/86 851.42 ED 'I 266138 10/03/86 169.82- ED 266138 10/03/86 451.30 ED CHECK REGISTER VENDOR PHILLIPS PHILLIPS PHILLIPS PHILLIPS PHILLIPS PHILLIPS PHILLIPS PHILLIPS _... - -. -- PHILLIPS PHILLIPS PHILLIPS PHILLIPS PHILLIPS PHILLIPS- __ -___ PHILLIPS PHILLIPS PHILLIPS 09 -30 -86 PAGE 10 ITEM - DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT- NO.- INV_.__N_P.O_N_MESSAGE. ----- - - ED PHILLIPS - - -- 50- 4628 - 842 -84 -___ 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL -_ -_ --50-3710-862-86 _- ._, - -____ MANUAL 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL ' 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL _ 50- 4626 - 822 -82 - __ MANUAL 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50-4626-822-82— MANUAL- SO-4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86_ _-MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL SO -4628- 822 -82 l MANUAL _ 50-4628- 822- 82— _- ____._...__-. MANUAL . 50-4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 11 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4628- 842 -84 - -- 266138 10/03/86 3,043.90 ----- - - ED PHILLIPS - - -- 50- 4628 - 842 -84 _ MANUAL MANUAL ,.l 266138 10/03/86 92.00 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 862 -66 MANUAL , _ .266138 _ —_ 10/03/86 —_ ________ 44.00_- . ED- PHILLIPS— _-- .__- -_____ _ 50- 4628 - 862- 86 MANUAL _ 266138 09/24/86 88.55 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84 MANUAL r ' 13,228.06 r 266435 10/03/86 ._ -_ 6.28-- _______ ---6.28- PRIOR trrrrr ,CO _,. _ _ _ _ - "--`- 50 -3710- 822- 82_ MANUAL rrr -CKS 266435 266198 09/24,/86_- 6,575.27. ____GROUP HEALTH...__- . -__.. _CITY_._eORT_IONS. 10- 4J_55=5 -L0_51 _._ MANUAL - -- .. MANUAL 6,575.27 s 10/03/86 313.90 PRIOR WINE CO 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 266378 10/03/86 266378..__.__10 /03/86_ "J 'i 266433 10/03/86 266433 10/03/86 266433 09/24/86 3.20- MARK VII SALES INC 160.00 -_.. -_ MARK_VII- SALES_.INC 156.80 r 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL MANUAL srs -CKS _ 4.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 183.84 _._____PAUSTIS 6- SONS 50- 4628 - 842-84 _____ MANUAL 48.00 PAUSTIS & SONS INVENTORY 50- 4632- 842 -84 MANUAL ,ar ' 235.84 t it;l rrrrss - - - - -- - - - .. rri -CKS - �� .. _, 266435 10/03/86 ._ -_ 6.28-- _______ ---6.28- PRIOR WINE ,CO _,. _ _ _ _ - "--`- 50 -3710- 822- 82_ MANUAL 266435 10/03/86 17.60- PRIOR WINE CO - -. - - - 50 -3710- 842 -84 - -- .. MANUAL 266435 10/03/86 313.90 PRIOR WINE CO 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 26643509/24/86_ _13.S0 _ INVENTORY 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 266435 10/03/86 880.00 PRIOR WINE CO 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL ,. 1,183.52 r "i - - rrrrrr rrr -CKS i, ...-266442 09/24/86 1 E, 728. -55 PHP _- CITY PORTIONS 1 0;4156 5, 0-51_ 18,728.55 s -MANUAL-, , It J ;2 1986 . OF EDINA 31— _ 266451 ___1 0/03/86 -_�_ 6. 01- 266451 10/03/86 _1. 3.06- _. 266451 10/03/86 23.41- CITY W _ 266451° 10/03/86 109.78 - ' 266451 10/03/86 1.29- WINE 266451 10/03/86 33.67 - '' TWIN C 10/03/86 801,65 266451 10/03/86 64.90 - 266451 10/03/86 5,496.20 ' 266451 10/03/86 1_,_685.24_ CITY W 266451 10/03/86 310.38 10_/03/86 4 266451 10/03/86 2,351.75 CHECK ISTER 09 -30 -8. ,AGE 11 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. 0 MESSAGE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY.WINE- QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE '� r rsssss "' 2 266540 1 10/03/86 1 1.28- T TWIN C CITY W WINE 266540 1 10/03/86 3 30.06- T TWIN C CITY W WINE "i 2 266540_ 1 10/03/86 1 1_.09 -_ T TWIN C CITY W WINE 266540 1 10/03/86 — 1.62- — CITY W WINE 266540 1 10/03/86 1 1.49- T TWIN C CITY W WINE _ 2 266540 1 10_/03/86 4 4_.13- T TWIN C CITY W WINE 266540 1 10/03/86 1 13.88- T TWIN C CITY W WINE 266540 1 10/03/86 4 4.51- T TWIN C CITY W WINE I� 2 266540_ 1 10/03/86 1 124.99- T TWIN C CITY W WINE I'I 2 266540 1 10/03/86 a as T TWIN C CITY W WINE ri;nl 2 266540 1 10/03/86 7 75.05- T TWIN C CITY _ WINE 266540 1 10/03/86 1 1.65- T TWIN C CITY W WINE _ 2 266540 1 6, _ W TWIN C CITY W WINE 266540 1 10/03/86 1 1,502.67 T TWIN C CITY W WINE 266540 1 10/03/86 _ 6 6,250.56_ T TWIN C CITY W WINE 266540 1 10/03/86 7 74.49 T TWIN C CITY W WINE -; = 10/03/86 — 12.75- T TWIN C CITY W WINE =�266540 1 266540 1 10/03/86_ 3 3,752.03 T TWIN C CITY W WINE j 2 266540 1 — 1 162.90 T TWIN C CITY W WINE - 2 266540 1 10/03/86 1 109.39 T TWIN C CITY W WINE 266540 _ _ __10/03/86 _ 1 126.90 T TWIN C CITY W WINE 266540 1 10/03/86 _ 450.95 T TWIN C CITY W WINE 266540 1 10/03/86 1 1,388.19 T TWIN C CITY W WINE ' 2 266540 1 10/03/86_ _ 412.68 T TWIN C CITY W WINE 266540 1 _ 4 154.80 T TWIN C CITY W WINE 266540 1 10/03/86 1 165.00 T TWIN C CITY W WINE j 2 266540 0 09/24/86 2 239.61 T TWIN C CITY W WINE 266540 _ 09/24/86 7 79.87 T TWIN C CITY W WINE 14, 596.25 r 273067.l 0/03/86 273067 10/03/86 273067 10/03/86 273067 10/03/86 273067 10/03/86 �! 273067 10/03/86 4 -1.60 _ CAPITAL__CITY DISTRI 42.74 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 10.00 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 358.32 CAPITAL_ CITY_. DISTRI 2.50 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 163.48 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI INVENTORY INVENTORY 50- 3710 - 822 -82 ______ MANUAL I 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL ' 50- 371.0- 842 -84 _MANUAL__ ^• 50- 3710 - 842-64 MANUAL —t:o 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -4626- 822 -82- MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL al 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626,_- 862_ -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL sss -CKS 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50-3710- 822 -82- -_ MANUAL. 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL - 50-3710-842-84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL - 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- .3710-862 -86 MANUAL.__ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4626- 842 -64 - MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4628- 842 -84-- MANUAL _ 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4630- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4630- 842 -84 _ MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50 -4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 862 -86 50 -4628- 862 -86 000 -CKS MANUAL MANUAL t� i ' I MANUAL ' MANUAL ICI MANUAL ' MANUAL I„ ' . . .. - -- -'4 4 -1.60 _ CAPITAL__CITY DISTRI 42.74 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 10.00 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 358.32 CAPITAL_ CITY_. DISTRI 2.50 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 163.48 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI INVENTORY INVENTORY 50- 3710 - 822 -82 ______ MANUAL I 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL ' 50- 371.0- 842 -84 _MANUAL__ ^• 50- 3710 - 842-64 MANUAL —t:o 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -4626- 822 -82- MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL al 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626,_- 862_ -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL sss -CKS 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50-3710- 822 -82- -_ MANUAL. 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL - 50-3710-842-84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL - 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- .3710-862 -86 MANUAL.__ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4626- 842 -64 - MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4628- 842 -84-- MANUAL _ 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4630- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4630- 842 -84 _ MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50 -4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 862 -86 50 -4628- 862 -86 000 -CKS MANUAL MANUAL t� i ' I MANUAL ' MANUAL ICI MANUAL ' MANUAL I„ ' . . .. - -- -'4 INVENTORY INVENTORY 50- 3710 - 822 -82 ______ MANUAL I 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL ' 50- 371.0- 842 -84 _MANUAL__ ^• 50- 3710 - 842-64 MANUAL —t:o 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -4626- 822 -82- MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL al 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626,_- 862_ -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL sss -CKS 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50-3710- 822 -82- -_ MANUAL. 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL - 50-3710-842-84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL - 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- .3710-862 -86 MANUAL.__ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4626- 842 -64 - MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4628- 842 -84-- MANUAL _ 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4630- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4630- 842 -84 _ MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50 -4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 862 -86 50 -4628- 862 -86 000 -CKS MANUAL MANUAL t� i ' I MANUAL ' MANUAL ICI MANUAL ' MANUAL I„ ' . . .. - -- -'4 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50-3710- 822 -82- -_ MANUAL. 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL - 50-3710-842-84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL - 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- .3710-862 -86 MANUAL.__ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4626- 842 -64 - MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4628- 842 -84-- MANUAL _ 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4630- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4630- 842 -84 _ MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50 -4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 862 -86 50 -4628- 862 -86 000 -CKS MANUAL MANUAL t� i ' I MANUAL ' MANUAL ICI MANUAL ' MANUAL I„ ' . . .. - -- -'4 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50 -4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 862 -86 50 -4628- 862 -86 000 -CKS MANUAL MANUAL t� i ' I MANUAL ' MANUAL ICI MANUAL ' MANUAL I„ ' . . .. - -- -'4 1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -30 -86 PAGE 12 CHECK_- NQ—DATE__. -_ _AMOUNT_...—___ -- _ VENDOR .. � 21 273067 10/03/86 j - ., _273067_,._ - -10/03/_86 ,I - `1 - -- sssss► it 273129 273129 273129 111111 ITEM.. DESCRIPTION — .ACCOUNT. NO.- INV._ .8- P. 0­# 185.98 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 862 -86 _— __.185.98 -_ —CAP_I.TAL- CI-T-Y_.DISTRI_ —_ 50-4628c.862=86_ _ -__ 598.64 * 10/03/86 1,051.05 BELLBOY ­1 _. _2,493.00 BELLBOY 10/03/86 2,937.04 BELLBOY 6,481.09 t 50 -4626- 822 -82 50- 4626-842 -84 _ 50- 4626 - 862 -86 - MESSAGE MANUAL MANUAL_ I �^ I ttt -CKS _ MANUAL ___.. MANUAL MANUAL t *t -CKS 7 MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL .._. -. MANUAL MANUAL --MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL .. MANUAL MANUAL �. MANUAL _.._ MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL _ MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL _. MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL .MANUAL ** *-CKS MANUAL _ MANUAL MANUAL rr"i MANUAL h, 9 273135 -._ 10/06/86 --­6O--­EAGLE _ WINE DISCOUNT, - -_ 50 -371 0- 003- 00.-_. - .- -_.___. B7313S 10/03/86 35.28- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 - 273135 10/03/86 2.01- EAGLE WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 i 273135 10/03/86 12.26- EAGLE WINE50 -3710- 822 -82 j 273135 10/03/86 5.17- EAGLE WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82^ _ e, 273135 10/03/86 24.65- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 273135 ._._10/03/86 _3.1.69 - -A EAGLE WINE _._. —50- 3710- B42- 84.— .�—...____ 273135 10/03/86 .14 EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 .`' 273135 10/03/86 .14- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 f 273135 10/03/86 _ .14 _ EAGLE WINE _ 50- 3710 - 662 -86 273135 10/03/86 5 0.48- EAGLE WINE 50 -3710- 862 -66 .."I 273135 10/03/86 21.64- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 273135 ---I 0/03/86_ __ 13.46 =___ EAGLE WINE - - -_ 50- 3710- 862 -86. __—. —. 273135 10/03/86 334.27- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 .� 273135 10/03/86 613.05 EAGLE WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 273135 10/03/86 1,232.40 EAGLE WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 273135 10/03/86 2,524.00 EAGLE WINE SO- 4626- 862 -86 — 273135 10/03/86 672.85 EAGLE WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 _ 273135 __-10/03/86__!- 1J 323.48 WINE _- 50- 4626 - 862 -86 273135 10/03/86 258.60 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 273135 10/03/86 100.65 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628-822 -82 273135._ 10/03/86_ 1,764.00- EAGLE WINE_ 50- 4628- 822 -82 273135 10/03/86 3.57 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 273135 10/03/86 1,584.54 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 273135 _ 10/03/86 _ _ 3.57- EAGLE WINE —_ 50 -4628- 842 -84 273135 10/03/86 3.57- EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 273135 10/03/86 11082.22 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 273135 10/03/86 5.39 - -- — EAGLE WINE--,-.--- _. -. - -_— 50- 4628 - 662 -86 273135 10/03/86 5.39 EAGLE WINE — SO -4628- 862 -86 273135 10/03/86 5.39- EAGLE WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 i 273135 10/06/86 89.67 EAGLE WINE INVENTORY.,__ 50- 463E - 822- 82_— I� 273135 10/06/86 66.74 EAGLE WINE -- INVENTORY ____ -_ • - SO- 4632 - 842 -84 273135 10/06/86 1.96- EAGLE WINE DISCOUNT 50- 4632- 862 -86 "'' 273135 10/06/86 40_20_ EAGLE WI_NE _ INVENTORY .- 50_4632- 862-86 ''1 _ ittttt I 273138 10/03/86 44.62- ED PHILLIPS SO- 3710 - 822 -82 �.�__ 273138_ 10/03/86 3.-92- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 273136 10/03/86 19.50- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 822 -82 s " 273138 10/03/86 11.70- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 7 MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL .._. -. MANUAL MANUAL --MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL .. MANUAL MANUAL �. MANUAL _.._ MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL _ MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL _. MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL .MANUAL ** *-CKS MANUAL _ MANUAL MANUAL rr"i MANUAL h, 9 J 1986 f OF EDINA �z CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR CHECK .ISTER 2 273138 10/03/86 11.70- ED PHILLIPS ' _._ _ 273138 1 0/03/86 -_. —_ 54.26- ED , PHILLIPS 1" 273138 10/03/86 8.10- _ -• ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 842 -84 273138 10/03/86 39.00- ED PHILLIPS j "__ 273136 10/03/86 29_61- ED PHILLIPS ,ear 273138 10/03/86 23.48- ED PHILLIPS v17 273138 10/03/86 9.03- ED PHILLIPS 273138_ 10/03/86 2.,712.79_ ED _PHILLIPS ° 273136 10/03/86 1,173.95 - -_- ED PHILLIPS 273138 10/03/86 196.10 ED PHILLIPS _ 273138 10/03/86 2,231.05 ED PHILLIPS i 273138 10/03/86 975.00 ED PHILLIPS 273138 10/03/86 405.10 ED PHILLIPS 273138 10/03/86_ ED PHILLIPS _ 273138 -_ 10/03/86 _585.00 _ 585.00 _ ED PHILLIPS - 273138 10/03/86 451.40 ED PHILLIPS 273138 10/03/_86 11950._00_ ED PHILLIPS_ 273138 10/03/86 1,480.62 ED PHILLIPS 12, 491.09 s _- 273368 10_/_06/86 3,012.38 MUTUAL_LIFE 1'_ 273368 10/06/86 3,102.38 MUTUAL BENEFIT ' -1 273368 10/06/86 3,102.38- MUTUAL BENEFIT 012_38 s -- !� •,I sssess - - 273378 10/03/86 - 3.20- - - MARK VII SALES �''I 1 273378 10/03/86 160.00 MARK VII SALES 156_80 • 'y z sssess 273433 10/0386 218.92 PAUSTIS--&-SONS' AUSTIS & SONS 273433 10/03/86 5.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 273433 10/03/86 _ 180.68 PAUSTIS & SONS 273433 10/03/86 4.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 273433 10/03/86 180.68 PAUSTIS & SONS 4 _ 273433 10/03/86 4.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 273433 10%03/86 4.00- PAUSTIS & SONS 273433 10/03/86 180.68- PAUSTIS & SONS 408.60 • .. esesrs I,. 273435 10/03/86 4.35- PRIOR WINE CO 273435 10/03/86 7.41- PRIOR WINE CO 273435 10/03/86 _ 12.80- i A PRIOR WINE CO- 27343S 10/03/86 217.40 PRIOR WINE CO ' 273435 10/03/86 370.38 PRIOR WINE CO 273435 10/03/86 639.93 PR1nR UTNF rn 1,203.05 + 09 -30-80 PAGE 13 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. A MESSAGE 50- 3710- 842 -84 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710- 842 -84 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710 - 862 -86. — - - 50- 3710 - 862 -66 50 -3710- 862 -86 50- 4626 - 642 -84 50- 4626 - 662 -86 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628- 842 -64 50 -4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 842 -84 50 -4628- 862 -86 50- 4628- 862 -86 50 -4628- 862 -86 EMP BENEFITS 10 =4158- 51.0 -51 DIS PREMIUM 10- 4158 - 510 -81 CORRECTION 10- 4158 - 510 -51 INC 50- 3710- 842-84 INC 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50 -4628- 822 -82� 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628 - 862 -86 , 50- 4628- 862 -86 50 -4628- 862 -86 50- 4628- 862 -86-- 50- 4628- 862 -86 �0- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL ' MANUAL MANUAL__ MANUAL MANUAL I;I MANUAL MANUAL ' MANUAL MANUAL _ I' MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL `•i _.1 -- - rer -CKS i MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL !-J ere -CKS I.� MANUAL - , 1.1 MANUAL I, •se -CKS I. MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL I. MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL ••• -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 - MANUAL 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL , 50-3710-86e-86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50= 4628862_86 MANUAL_ —h= ,ear - -- — - - -- rrr -CKS .. _.'e 1986 CITY OF EDINA V _CHECK_NO DATE AMOUNT . 273451.-- 10/03/86___.___ -�- __16.88 273451 10/03/86 17.09- ,..' 273451 10/03/86 27.08- _.273451_ 10/03/86 24.89 7_ 273451 10/03/86 1.02 - ri' 273451 10/03/86 34.21- 273451 10/03/86 - -_._ __ - 30.24 -- 273451 10/03/86 4.32- ,1" 273451 10/03/86 855.58 273451 10/03/86 _ 1,356.97 _ 273451 10/03/86 1,712.05 273451 10/03/86 1,692.75 273451 10/03/86_. 2,493.00 -_ 273451 10/03/86 3,035.61 273451 10/03/86 433.50 _ _273451_ 1- 0/03/86 _102.00_ 273451 10/06/86 13.12 11,538.85 s i swswrw ti 273540 10/03/86 29.11- 273540 10/03/86 6.64 - Q. 273540 10/03/86 3.91- _ 273540 10/03/86._, 1_.76 =_ l 273540 10/03/86 .35 -s; 273540 10/03/86 2.40- _ -_ 273540 _ 10/03/86 85.84- _ 273540 10/03/86 24.49 - 273540 10/03/86 3.06- 273540 1 0/03/86_ _ 9. 02 -. 273540 10/03/86 1.54 - �, 273540 10/03/86 18.97- _ 273540 10/03/86 _5.62 273540 10/03/86 8.79 - 273540 10/03/86 8.40- 273540 10/ 03/86. - __1 L. 63 273540 10/03/86 7.22 - a 'I 273540 10/03/86 .35 273540_ 10/03/86__ _14,09- __ :I 273540 10/03/86 1,455.61 ® 273540 10/03/86 4,292.34 273540 10/03/86 _ 155.00-_ - 273540 10/03/86 427.62 273540 10/06/86 153.86 273540 10/03/86_ 360_95 273540 10/03/86 176129 _ 273540 10/03/86 41.25 - 273540 10/03/86 664.94 _ 273540 10/03/86 242.30 273540 10/03/86 391.45 _ 273540_ 1_0/03/86 900_87 - 273540 10/03/86 154.80 � 273540 10/03/86 1,896.64 s CHECK REGISTER 09 -30 -86 PAGE 14 .__- VENDOR_- ITEM _DESCRIPT.ION ACCOUNT_NO..__INV, i P.0__.# .MESSAGE I. �I QUALITY WINE ___ __ 50- 3710- 822 -82___ ___._____ MANUAL.___.'_ QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL I6 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL QUALITY WINE _., 50 -3710- 842 -84 __ MANUAL____ QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MA N UAL „j QUALITY WINE_ __ --. -- _50-3710-862-86._,_______ MANUAL ..._.7?� QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL I;'! QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL QUALITY WINE . _- -�_ 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL QUALITY WINE 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 842- 84___._.__ - MANUAL QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 ..MANUAL QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL .QUALITY_WINE _ _50- 4628- 862 -86___ __ _ MANUAL _ QUALITY WINE INVENTORY 50- 4632- 842 -84 MANUAL `i TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL .._. TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL TWIN CITY WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 __..____. MANUAL TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL TWIN CITY WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL J TWIN CITY WINE----- --.MANUAL _ TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL i TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL TWIN CITY WINE ._50- 3710 - 842 -84 _._ -. _ .. MANUAL TWIN CITY WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL TWIN CITY WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL TWIN CITY .WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL TWIN CITY WINE _ .50-3710- 862 -86 __ _. _ MANUAL _ TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710- 862-86 MANUAL TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL .I TWIN CITY WINE 50- 371.0- 862 -86 MANUAL 1 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL I TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL TWIN CITY WINE " _ _ ___._____ -50- 4626- 862 -86 _ -_ - - MANUAL TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -66 MANUAL TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL TWIN CITY WINE - 50 -4626- 862 -86 ___ ___ MANUAL. TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 - MANUAL TWIN CITY WINE SO- 4628 - 622 -82 MANUAL TWIN CITY WINE _50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL. TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL TWIN- _CITY__WINE„ _50- 4628- 842 -84 _ MANUAL , - TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628-842 -84 MANUAL ' TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL vo �w 1V ti Ifto 1too .y del 2J 1986 OF EDINA 281,496.35 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND CHECK ISTER 09 -30 -6 AGE 15 Handed typed checks If's 72038 thru FQg.P.AYM6N7. CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. 4 PAGES...— __. �e .I4V _P__O__i_MESSAGE__— "I 1 273540 10/03/86 2,449.13 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 642 -84 MANUAL 3 ' 273540 ___ 10/03/86 __306.20 , TWIN CITT -WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84_ _ ___. MA N UAL__.._— ' ` 273540 10/03%8 6 1,408.30 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 273540 10/03/86 880.82 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL , __273540 10/03/_8_6 565.28 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862_ -86 MANUAL 273540 10/03/86 840.78 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 17, 130.14 r �� „ -- ss�sss— - - - -- - -- --- rs—CKS~ r 27_9741 10/06/86 2,000_00_ POSTMASTER POSTAGE 10 -4290- 510 -51 MANUAL 1 — �' i rrrssr Myr —CKS — -- 781,836.60 — FUND 10 TOTAL- - - - - -- GENERAL FUND— -------- __ 571.90 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 2,_972.19 FUND 26-TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND _ 4I 12,838.92 FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND °'I 6,668.63 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND " 349.35 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND vo �w 1V ti Ifto 1too .y del 2J 30,170.87 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 281,496.35 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 1,116,904.81 TOTAL — Handed typed checks If's 72038 thru FQg.P.AYM6N7. i;EC:t rFC-IS1 t11 .. PAGES...— ►F�cajaR �e "I 1 �e , , �1 vl u� , e� 0