HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-01-07_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
JANUARY 7, 1985
7:00 P.M.
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
ROLLCALL
MINUTES of December 3, 1984, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of ,
seconded by
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
OATHS OF OFFICE - C. Wayne Courtney, Peggy Kelly, Leslie C. Turner
APPOINTMENT OF MAYOR PRO TEM
MINUTES of the Regular Council Meetings of October 1 and November 19, 1984, approved as
submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.`
Presentation by City Manager or Engineer. Public comment heard. If Council wishes
to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass if improve-
ment has been petitioned for; 4/5 vote required if no petition;
* A. Preliminary Plan Approval and Variance Request - France Avenue Improvement
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. First reading of
Zoning Ordinance requires offering of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall
vote to pass-Second Reading or if Second Reading should be waived. Lot Divisions,
Plats, Appeals from Administration or Board of Appeals and Adjustments decisions
require action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass.
A. Zoning Change
1. Second Reading
a. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to MD -5 Mixed Development District,
Edinborough - Generally located west of York Avenue and south of
West 76th Street (Contd from 12/17/84) (Continue to 1/21/85)
B. Lot Division
* 1. Lots 28 and 29, Warden Acres - Generally located north of Benton Avenue
and went of MN &S .Railroad
C. Set Hearing Dates (1/21/85)
1. R- 1.Single Dwelling Unit District to POD -2 Planned Office District and
Preliminary Plat Approval - Opus Corporation /Normandale Golf Inc. -
Camelot West
2. Final Development Plan - Edina Family Care Clinic_- Generally located East
of Vernon Avenue and north of Link Road
III. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
IV. AWARD OF BIDS
* A. Reconstruction of 1974 Ford Pirsch L9000 Pumper (Contd from 12/17/84)
* B. 1985 -86 Park and Recreation Activities Calendar
V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
* A. Braemar Golf Course Improvements
B. Appointment of H.R.A. Commissioners `(3)
* C. 1985 LMC Policies and Priorities
* D. Upcoming Council Meetings and Hearings
E. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council
F. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items
VI. RESOLUTIONS
* A. Tax - forfeited Land - Hennepin County List #670 -NC
* B. Official Depositories Designation
C. Signatory Resolution
X D. Facsimile Signatures Resolution
* E. Assignment of Securities in Lieu of Bond Resolution
1. First Bank Edina
2. First Southdale National Bank
* F. Release of Tax - forfeited Lands - Van Valkenburg Park
Agenda
Edina City Council
January 7, 1985
VIII. ORDINANCES
A. Second Reading
* 1. Ordinance No. 812 -A2 - Regulating Construction and Maintenance of Radio
and Television Antennas, Exterior,Dish Antennas, and Supporting Towers
IX. FINANCE
A. 1985 Budget Distribution
B. Claims Paid. Motion of seconded by ,
for payment of the following claims as per Pre -List dated 1/7/85: General Fund
$41,426.82 Park Fund $6,600.77, Art Center $16.50, Golf Course Fund $169.81,
Recreation Center Fund $331.51, Waterwork Fund $297.00, Sewer Rental Fund
$159,750.99, Liquor Dispensary Fund $9,917.36, Total $218,510.76
0
MINUTES
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
DECEMBER 3, 1984
Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner and Mayor
Courtney.
MINUTES of November 5, 1984, were approved as submitted by motion of Member
Schmidt, seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned by motion of Member
Schmidt, seconded by Member Turner, Motion carried. ,-,. ^ I'll
G<-don L.
Hugh
Executive
Direc or
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
OCTOBER 1, 1984
Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner and Mayor
Courtney.
EDINA'S.YEAR OF THE SCHOOL PROCLAIMED BY MAYOR. Mayor Courtney presented the
following proclamation which was unanimously approved:
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, Edina Public Schools' lifelong education responsibility will become
increasingly important as our society moves into an information age and desires job
retraining and early childhood and family education; and
WHEREAS, the public schools of Edina have long been seen as community resources,
centers for intellectual, physical, social and emotional fulfillment of community
residents; and
WHEREAS, public schools in Edina are committed to providing outstanding educational
opportunity for all learners, regardless of sex, race, religion, or economic status;
and
WHEREAS, Edina Public Schools are responsive to recent calls for self - examination
and evaluation and are making changes for improvement; and
WHEREAS, the Edina Public Schools have encouraged and fostered public involvement
and direction through many vehicles; and
WHEREAS, personnel staffing Edina Public Schools have shown,.over the years, con-
sistent and unwavering devotion to meeting the varying needs of individual learners;
and
WHEREAS, the Edina Public Schools contribute significantly to the quality of life
in our City; and
WHEREAS, the Edina Public Schools have been recognized nationally as outstanding;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, C. WAYNE COURTNEY, Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby proclaim
1984 -85 to be
EDINA'S YEAR OF THE SCHOOL
PROCLAIMED this lst day of October, 1984.
JERRY DALEN COMMENDED. Mr. Rosland asked Jerry Dalen to come forward to be introduced
as Finance Director - Treasurer for the City. He advised that Mr. Dalen started with
the City in the Fall of 1955 and that he is has been the key person in keeping the
City in good financial status. Mr. Rosland commended him for his duty and dedication
in serving the City and presented him with a silver pen bearing the City logo. The
Council Members joined in expressing their appreciation for his excellent work.
MINUTES of the Regular Meetings of August 6 and August 20, 1984, and of the Special
Meeting of August 20, 1984, were approved as submitted by motion of Member Schmidt,
seconded by Member Turner.
Ay2s: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARINGS CONDUCTED ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (BA -259 AND TT -84). Affidavits of
Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Due
notice having been given, public hearings were conducted and action taken as herein-
after recorded on the following proposed assessments:
1. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -259
Location: Vernon Avenue from Gleason Road to Lincoln Drive; Lincoln Drive from
Vernon Avenue.to Londonderry Drive
Engineer Hoffman recalled the the public hearing on special assessment for Street
Improvement No. BA -259, Vernon Avenue from Gleason Road to Lincoln Drive; Lincoln
Drive from Vernon Avenue to Londonderry Drive, had been continued by the Council
at their meeting of September 17, 1984, to this date so that the developers of The
Habitat who had appeared in objection to the proposed assessment could prepare and
present a specific proposal as to assessment for the irregular shaped Lots 1, 5, 6
and 14 abutting Lincoln Drive. Mr. Hoffman explained that the City's policy for
assessing lots that do not front on the improved street:is:to assess against 1/3 of
the proposed footage. He pointed out that the Council had reduced a backyard assess-
ment from 1/3 of the total footage to 1/6 of the total footage for the Dewey Hill
Road project. The difference between the Dewey Hill Road project and this project
is that the City would allow access to the Dewey Hill project and no access was
allowed in The Habitat project due to the road configuration. Staff believes there
is some added value as a result of the improved roadway but would recommend the
Council review this as a slightly different situation than normal to decide if the
ratio of assessable footage should be reduced. Rudy Trones, at developer of The
Habitat, was present and stated their objections to the assessment as proposed for
these reasons: 1) the design of The Habitat project is such that no usage of the side
or back yards for acess is permissable as stated in the resolution approving the plat,
and 2) the D.N.R. wetlands on Lot 5 and 6 emcompass 50% of these lots diminishing
usable space and therefore the effective yard footage should be reduced accordingly.
In response to Member Richards'as.to a specific proposal for the assessment, Mr. Trones
10/1/84
responded that he felt the assessment should be spread over all properties in the
area whose only egress is onto Vernon Avenue /Lincoln Drive. Mr. Hoffman advised
that if the proposed assessment were reduced for these lots, the City could apply
for State Aid Funds for the balance of the cost not assessed. After further
discussion, Member Schmidt moved the assessment for Street Improvement No. BA -259
as proposed in the Analysis of Assessment presented at the meeting of September 17,
1984. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Member Richards argued that because
the plat approval was conditioned upon no direct access from these lots to Vernon
Avenue /Lincoln Drive that the proposed assessable footage for these lots be reduced
from
1/3 to 1/6 and offered an amendment to the motion for such action. The amend-
ment was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Schmidt,
,Mayor Courtney then called the motion as amended that the proposed assessable footage
for Lots 1, 5, 6 and 14, The Habitat, be reduced from 1/3 (280.67 total footage) to
1/6 (140.34 total.footage).
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Schmidt
No further comments were heard and no further written objections to the proposed
assessments were received prior hereto. (Assessments levied by Resolution later in
Minutes.)
2. TREE TRIMMING IMPROVEMENT NO. TT -84
Location: Country Club and Morningside Areas
Mr. Rosland presented presented Anaylsis of Assessment for Tree Trimming Improvement
No. TT -84 showing total cost of trees trimmed at $52,939.00 proposed to be assessed
against 1,268 assessable trees at $41.75 per tree, to be spread over one year payable
with.taxes due in.1985, with interest rate of 11.5 %. Mr. Rosland advised that eight
letters of objection to the proposed assessment are on file and that all have been
.resolved to the satisfaction of the property owners except one that could not be
contacted. Appearing and speaking in objection to the assessment as proposed were:
Robert Hill, 4508 Bruce Avenue; Jacob Van'tLand, 4021 W. 44th Street; Douglas
Gillespie, 4115 Sunnyside Road:and Jim .O.'Brien,.4352 France Avenue So.,--Following
presentation of Analysis of Assessments, Member Bredesen introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED ON ACCOUNT OF
VARIOUS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of- Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The City has given notice of hearings as required by law on the proposed assess-
ment rolls for the improvements hereinafter referred to, and at such hearings held on
October 1, 1984, has considered all oral and written objections presented against the
levy of such assessments.
2. Subject to the amendment made in paragraph 3 of this resolution, each of the assess -
ments ad set forth in the assessment rolls on file in the office of the City Clerk for
the following. improvements:
STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -259
TREE TRIMMING IMPROVEMENT NO. TT -84
does not exceed the local benefits conferred by said improvements upon the lot, tract
or parcel of land so assessed, and all of said assessments are hereby adopted and
confirmed as the proper..assessments on account of said respective improvements to be
spread against the benefited lots, parcels and tracts of land described therein.
3. Said assessments are hereby amended as follows: Street Improvement No. BA -259 -
total assessable footage for Lots 1, 5, 6 and 14, The Habitat, is reduced from 1/3 to
1/6 for a.total of 240.34 assessable feet..:.):.:
4. The assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments, the first of said
installments, together with interest at a rate of 11.5% per annum on the entire assess-
ment from the date hereof to December 31, 1985, -to be payable with the general taxes
for the year 1985. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows:
Name of Improvement Number of Installments
STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -259 10 years
TREE TRIMMING IMPROVEMENT NO. TT -84 1 year
5. The City Clerk shall forthwith prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a copy
of this resolution and a certified duplicate of said assessments with each then unpaid
installment and interest set 'forth separately, to be extended on the tax lists of the
County in accordance with this resolution.
6. The Clerk shall also mail notice of any special assessment which may be payable
by a county, by a political subdivision, or by the owner of any right of way as
required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.061, Subdivision 4, and if any such assess-
ment is not paid in a single installment, the City Treasurer shall arrange for collect-
tion thereof in installments, as set forth in said section.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Schmidt.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Schmidt voted No on the amendment to Street Improvement No. BA -259
Resolution adopted.
10/1/84
FINAL PLAT APPROVED FOR EDINA MILLS TOWNHOMES. Mr. Hughes presented the request
for final plat approval for Edina Mills Townhomes, located at 4600 France Avenue,
advising that the project consisting of a seven unit townhouse is in the construction
stages. Staff would recommend final plat approval, subject to a subdivision dedi-
cation. No objections being heard, Member Richards introduced the following reso-
lution and moved its adoption, subject to payment of a subdivision dedication fee
of $8,800.00:
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR
EDINA MILLS TOWNHOMES
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "Edina Mills Townhomes", platted by J.B.C. Development, a
Minnesota corporation, fee owner and Norwest Bank MetroWest, N.A., a national banking
association, mortgagee, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of
October 1, 1984, be and is hereby granted final plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded-by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
FINAL PLAT APPROVED FOR SMABY ADDITION. Mr. Hughes presented the request for
final plat approval for Smaby Addition, generally located north of Grove Street
and West of MN &S Railroad, for a five -lot single family subdivision of the property.
Staff would recommend final plat approval, subject to a.subdivision dedication to
the City of Outlot A which adjoins Garden Park. No objections being heard, Member
Turner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject to a
subdivision dedication of Outlot A to the City, as shown on the plat:
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT
FOR SMABY ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled " Smaby Addition ", platted by Philip C. Smaby and
Margaret H. Smaby, husband and wife, and presented at.the regular meeting of the
City Council of October 1, 1984, be and is hereby granted final plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
RELEASE OF RESTRICTION APPROVED FOR YORKTOWN FASHION MALL. Mr. Hughes advised that
the owner of the Yorktown Fashion Mall (Lots 1,2, and 3, Block 6, Yorktown) and
Wendy's of Minnesota, has requested a waiver of easements and restrictions, to
allow construction of a drive - through facility on the east,side of the building.
The drive - through would access from the existing curb cut on York Avenue and would
be a cul -de -sac type allowing customers to pick up orders and proceed back out.
In order to.make the design work, a second curb cut onto York Avenue is required
to allow access for delivery trucks principally and for some employee parking along
the southerly side of the mall. Mr. Hughes noted that the property is subject to
the declarations and protective easements that were imposed at the time of the
Yorktown plat. An amendment would be necessary to construct an additional curb
cut on York Avenue as requested. He added that Hennepin County has already issued
an entrance permit for this location, subject to the approval of the City. The
request is as follows: 1) Release of perpetual scenic and open space easement to
allow an additional curb cut in accordance with the site plan, and 2) Waiver of
restriction on free - standing signs to allow the construction of one drive -up
window ordering or menu board within 100 feet of the York Avenue right of way.
Mr. Hughes indicated that -both the drive - through and the free standing sign and
the curb cut comply with the Zoning Ordinance requirements. He advised that Fred
Hoisington, representing Wendy's, was present to answer questions. No objections
being heard, Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved adoption:.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, certain real estate situated in the City of Edina, Hennepin County,
Minnesota described as LOT 2, BLOCK 6, YORKTOWN is subject to certain restrictions
and protective covenants as set forth in the Declaration of Restrictions and
Protective Covenants dated May 3, 1972 filed for record June 8, 1972 in the office
of Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota as Document No. 1033727; and
WHEREAS, one of the restrictions to which said property is subject is as follows:
"No free standing signs or advertising of any kind watsoever shall be constructed
or maintained upon Lot 2, Block 1, Lot 5, Block 1, Lot 1, Block 2, Lot 1,
Block 6, Lot 2 Block 6, and Lot 2, Block 7, said plat of Yorktown, within
100 feet of the right -of -way for France Avenue or York Avenue, except signs
solely for traffic direction and not containing the name, symbol or logo of
any business or use on any Yorktown Lot.
WHEREAS, the easterly 20 feet of said described property is subject to a grant of
perpetual scenic and open space easements as contained in a Grant of Easement to
the City of Edina, Minnesota dated May 3, 1972 and recorded June 8, 1972 as
10/1/84
Document No. 1033728 by Glacier,Sand and Gravel Company and George J. and Virginia L.
Ablah; and
WHEREAS, the Easement Agreement reads as follows:
"No driveways, parking lots, signs, advertising, displays, buildings, structures
equipment, or any hard surfaced, non - vegative area, or any material or property
of any kind whatsoever shall be placed or maintained on or in the Edina Easements,
or any part thereof, without, in each instance, the prior written consent of
Edina;..."
WHEREAS, The City has been asked to remove said easement to allow for one additional
24 foot driveway, plus radii, from York Avenue to Lot 2,.Block 6 and the City Council
deems it advisable to authorize herewith the release in writing;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the covenant and restriction contained in said
Declaration of Restrictions and Protective Covenants Document No. 1033727 be amended
by adding to Paragraph 2 thereof the following:
"...and further excepting that one menu board shall be permitted not closer than
20 feet from the York Avenue right -of -way in conjunction with a restaurant
drive -up window."
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City hereby authorizes in writing the construction
of one additional 24 foot wide driveway for access to and from York Avenue plus the
necessary raddi over the easterly 20 feet of said Lot 2, Block 6, Yorktown.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
HEARING DATE SET FOR PLANNING MATTER. As recommended by staff, Member Bredesen's
motion was seconded by Member Schmidt setting October 15, 1984, as the hearing date
for Plan Amendment, Johnson Building Company, for Vernon Hills Condominiums, generally
located west of Vernon Avenue and south of West 52nd Street.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS /MENDELSSOHN 2ND ADDITION (484 -5 ENG).
Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of bids for Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -238,
Watermain Improvement No. WM -352, Storm Sewer Improvement No. ST.S -174, and Grading
Improvement No. C -141, all in Mendelssohn 2nd Addition /Arthur Street, as follows:
Sarah Contracting at $22,458.17 and G. L. Contracting, Inc. at $24,434.50. Staff
would recommend award of bid to low bidder.. Member Schmidt's motion was seconded
by Member Bredesen for award of bid to low bidder, Sarah Contracting at $22,458.17.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
REPORT GIVEN ON WEST 70TH STREET. Mr. Rosland recalled that at the last Council
Meeting residents of West 70th Street had expressed their concerns regarding the
heavy traffic on the street and the problems caused thereby. The Council had then
instructed the City Engineer to bring back proposals from several traffic consult -
ants for a study of the entire area of West 70th Street from Highway 100 to France
Avenue. Proposals have been received from Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc. at a
:maximum fee of $12,900; Bennett, Ringrose, Wolsfeld, Jarvis, Gardner, Inc. (BRW) at
.a maximum fee of $9,400; and Strgar- Roscoe, Inc. at a maximum fee of $11,300. Staff
has reviewed the proposals and would recommend either BRW or Strgar- Roscoe be
authorized to conduct the study. Mr. Rosland stated that the Council should consider
the make -up of the advisory committee so that the following would be represented:
School District, residents on W. 70th Street, residents from adjacent.area, Cornelia
P.T.A. and others as the Council may direct. He noted that staff would provide
statistics but it is suggested that staff not serve on the committee. The Police
are working with the school crossing guards at Cornelia and W. 70th Street and will
continue to do so. Staff feels that installing any stop signs now or doing extra
enforcement would taint the outcome of the study and that it may be wiser to get the
full report before extra efforts are taken. Identified persons addressing the Council
were: Phyllis Kohler, 4512 W. 70th Street, who stated she was instrumental in cir-
culating the petition presented to the Council; Scott Rogan, 4720 W. 70th Street,
Bob Burnett, Principal of Cornelia School; Julie Carr, 7301 Oaklawn Avenue; Patti
Watson, 4424 W. 70th Street and Donna Montgomery 6824 Oaklawn Avenue. Major concerns
voiced were the danger to children and residents attempting to cross W. 70th Street at
Cornelia Drive,.need for a semaphone at the intersection, and strong objection to the
striping at the intersection for four lanes of traffic. Mr. Burnett explained that
a safer method has been worked out with the help of the Police Department whereby
adult crossing guards have stepped out into the street, after the outside lane of
traffic has been stopped, to hold up a "Stop" sign for the inner lane of traffic,
but he pointed out that when the winter weather arrives and the street becomes
icy the adult guards will refuse to take that risk of stepping into the street.
After considerable discussion, Member Turner moved that 1) the Council authorize
the traffic study to be completed as soon as possible with a goal of 90 days to
be done by the firm of Strgar- Roscoe, Inc., 2) an advisory committee be appointed
10/1/84
not larger than 10 to 12 persons, with representation as suggested by the staff,
3) the white striping at the intersection be removed, 4) that adult crossing guards
be retained to assist the school patrols, 5) that the mailbox be moved further
away from the intersection; and 6) that the City maintain an intense snow removal
and sanding program at the intersection when the snow season arrives. Motion was
seconded by Member Bredesen. The question of supervision of the intersection by
off -duty vs. on -duty Police Officers was raised. Mr. Rosland clarified that at
the present time the on -duty Officer from that zone has been going to that inter-
section during the hours when students are crossing unless he is called away for
an emergency or accident. Chief Swanson pointed out that the Officer going to
that scene is 25% of the available Police Officers on duty, that the Officer is
there now less than one -half of the time during those hours, and that during the
ice and snow season may be called.for emergencies so that no Officer will be at
that intersection. He noted that the Reserve Police Officers are working people
in the community and would not be available at those times. The use of volunteers
from the neighborhood to serve as crossing guards for the interim was discussed.
Mayor Courtney then called for vote on the motion.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
After discussion as to how the advisory committee would be chosen, Member Richards
suggested that anyone who is interested in serving on the committee should submit
their names, indicating representation, to the City Clerk before the next Council
Meeting on October 21, 1984, so that the Council could make the appointments at
that meeting. Member Bredesen pointed out that the committee's function would
be advisory to the Council only and that any final decisions regarding W. 70th
Street would be made by the Council.
PLAN APPROVED.FOR EDINA /BLOOMINGTON STORM SEWER PROJECT. By memorandum Mr. Hoffman
advised the Council that the Bloomington city staff has completed construction plans
for the joint storm sewer project between Edina and Bloomington in the Pentagon
Park Office area. According to the Joint Power Agreement, the City of Edina must
give final plan approval. At a later date the Council will have an opportunity
to review the bids taken and must approve those for the project to proceed. Staff
would recommend approval of the plans and specifications and would also recommend
that the Council authorize that a request be processed with the Nine Mile Creek
Watershed Board for cost participation in the storm sewer control structure at the
pond which is estimated at $30,000.00. Member Richards thereupon moved approval
of the plans and specifications for the Edina /Bloomington Storm Sewer Project and
authorized that a request be processed with the Nine Mile Creek Watershed Board
for cost participation in the control structure at the pond according to their
policy for such projects. Motion was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
VERNON AVENUE SIGNALIZATION PROJECT STATUS GIVEN. In response to question of
Member Turner as to the status of the Vernon Avenue signalization project,
Mr. Hoffman advised that the Hennepin County is working on the request and has
been in contact with him. No action taken.
53RD STREET AND OAKLAWN AVENUE DRAINAGE DITCH NOTED. Member Schmidt stated she
has received a telephone call from Lyman Gross, 5324 Oaklawn Avenue, regarding a
drainage ditch-at 53rd Street and Oaklawn and had requested that a "BUMP" sign
be installed. Engineer Hoffman stated that staff was aware of the problem and
will respond. No Council action taken.
FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMENDED FOR OPEN HOUSE PROGRAM. Member Bredesen commented that
he had attended the Open House at the Fire Station and that the demonstrations
given were very well done. He added that he would like to have the subject of
fire planning /fire prevention presented and then discussed by the Council at an
off- Monday meeting. No action was taken.
PROPOSED SPEED SKATING RINK DISCUSSED. Member Richards referred to a recent news-
paper article regarding the proposed speed skating rink to be located at Braemar
Park, noting that the article inferred that the proposal had the approval of the
City Council. He stated that he did not support that proposal as it has been
presented up to this point in time and that it should not be construed that it
had been approved. Member Turner pointed out that when the proposed speed skating
rink was discussed by the Council the concept was approved with the request that
the Council be kept informed about developments, but that no specific proposal
had been approved. Mr. Kojetin stated he had continued pursuing the project at
no cost to the City, knowing that there were issues in the bid proposal that the
Council did not agree with. A meeting is scheduled with the Hennepin Park Reserve
District, the implementing agency, to discuss-the funneling of funds through the
District from the Metropolitan Council to the City of Edina for the operation and
management of the facility. Mr. Kojetin noted that the proposal stated that no
funding would come from the City of Edina. Bid proposals are to be submitted to
10/1/84
the Metropolitan Park and Open Space Commission by October 11, 1984. Member
Richards submitted that the proposal should be thoroughly considered by the Council
before action is taken as to approval. Mr. Rosland suggested that a letter be
sent to the Commission advising that the City Council cannot hear the proposal and
take action thereon until October 15, 1984. It was informally agreed to consider
the proposal for the speedskating rink at the October 15 Council meeting.
APPOINTMENT OF GENERAL ELECTION JUDGES APPROVED. As recommended by the City Clerk,
Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION APPOINTING GENERAL ELECTION JUDGES
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the following Election Judges be
appointed to serve on the Election Boards for the General /City Election to be held
November 6, 1984, and that the City Clerk be and is hereby authorized to make any
substitutions or additions as may be deemed necessary: Precinct No. 1: Eugenia
Williams, Chairman, Lois Hallquist, Dorie Capetz, Arlene Friday, Barbara Anderson,
Dorothy Richardson, Muriel Clauson,.Shirley DeLeo, Dorothy Falkenborg, Ceil Nightin-
gale, Marguerite Mannelly, Virginia Vonhof, Doris O'Neill, Eleanor Rosoff and'Tenny
Shober; Precinct No. 2: Marjorie Ruedy, Chairman, Pauline Carroll, Joan Flumerfelt,
Dale Jaspers, Laurie McKay; June Holmberg, Joyce Akason, Helen Chapman, Emily Scudder,
Ella Terry, Naomi Johnson, Sara Kirkman, Carol McGlone, Patricia Carlson and Betty
Jenson; Precinct No. 3: Linda Smith, Chairman, Ida Jean Cauble, Deidre Hedrick,
Christine Morgan, Judith O'Brien, Patricia Lang, Barbara McDavitt, Mary Panchot,
Carol Bruzic, Cathee Hare, Jane Hansen, Marilyn Tierney, Frances Grinley, Patricia
Dill, Betty Brown, and Nancy Strom; Precinct No. 4: Shirley Dibble, Chairman,
Jeanette Lushine, Helen Stafford, Rachel Schoening, Nina Potter, Marion Cracraft,
Sharon Andresen, Marge Brothers, Charlotte Scott, Betty Carver, Marge Jamieson,
Georgia Kersteter, Helen Lishman, Lois Loomis, Charlotte Neight, and Josephine Olson;
Precinct No. 5: Linnea Erickson, Chairman, Carol McPheeters, Phyllis Cooper, Rosemary
McGlynn, Mildred Karr, Betty Benjamin, Jacqueline Andrews, Joyce Andrews, Mailand Card,
Natalie Markowitz, Hazel Helgeson, Marjorie Grinnel, Barbara Martin, Helen Groth and
Edith Garmezy; Precinct No. 6: Jane Bains, Chairman, Catherine Swanson, Sue Zwakman,
Barbara Herbers, Mary Cleaveland, Monica Myhre, Joyce Sutherland, Audrey Clay, Wendy
Klemp, Jean Flaaten, Karen Lemenger, Lillian Graupner, Mary Manning, Hope Eilers,
Gertrude Rocheford and Lisa Boyum; Precinct No. 7: Bess Brudelie, Chairman, Helen
Peterson, Clara Fossy, Naomi Ward, Genevieve Thayer, Kathy Engquist, Dorothy Fredendall,
Joanne Swanson, Dianne Getsch, Florence Moynihan, Grace Andrews, Gladys Wardell, Dora
McCollister, Madelyn Dobbelman, Dorothy Stockdale and Evelyn Coffey; Precinct No. 8:
Jane Moran, Chairman, Myra Hykes, Mary Diessner, Florence Freudenthal, Kathy Bradford,
Barbara Raap, Velma Larson, Constance Ryan, Jean Mueller, Mary Lou Ott, Joanne Ryan,
Joanne Stephens, Lee Strang, LuJean Swenson, Mary Webber, and Eleanor Westerberg;
Precinct No. 9: Jacqueline Lindskoog, Chairman, Bette Comstock, Aileen Konhauser,
Nancy Grimsby, Connie Bing, Patricia Monson, Eunice Strunk, Jan Getten, Florence
Boughton, Margaret Dobbin, Jean Davenport, Judy Lund, Lavonne Stoakes, Margaret
Wodrich, Barbara Johnson and Avona.Carroll; Precinct No. 10: Ardy Dorsey, Chairman,
Mollie Baranaukas, Joan Ochs, Joan Burke, Clare Doyle, Marilyn Devereaux, Kay Bach,
Ruth Haggerty, Phyllis Jensen, Gladys Lidstone, Jenny McBride, Marguerite Ratelle,
Nancy Sour, Marie Zivokvich, Virginia Bodine and Jo Ann Lonergan; Precinct No. 11:
Geneva Smith, Chairman, Alice Burnell, Gina Sherman, Carol Melichar, Elinor Thornton,
Margaret Swanson, Mercedes Sandstrom, Nancy Atchison, Mary Ann Kubin, Lois Steinback,
Joy Perunovich, Karen Vickman, Lillian Graupner, Connie Hondl, Mary Ann Finlason and
.Mary Ann Torgerson; Precinct No. 12: Claire Ready, Chairman, Doris Barry, Carol Hite,
Shirley Bjerken, Gerda Robinson, Florance Ries, Karen Carlson, Carol Marnel, Beth
Montgomery, Monica Nilles, Mary Scholz, Doris Marchuk, Phyllis Mac Lennan, Phyllis
Kodler, Virginia McCollister and Mavis deLambert; Precinct No. 13: Edna Thomsen,
Chairman, Patricia Harmon, Phyllis Gruzbeck, Marge Belkin, Shirley Johnson, Ilona
Kerin, Ann Matula, Roma Rethwisch, Ellen Leslie, Zoe Bros, Ebba Frykman, Pauline
Mertes, Margaret Handy, Mollie Sherry, Mary Goodrich and Ruth Peterson; Precinct
No. 14: Mary Jane Platt, Chairman, Joyce Hanson, Betty Fuller, Esther Olson, Louise
Carlson, Amanda Bauman, Myrt Grette, Cynthia Loveland, Peggy Zeilinger, Audrey Ander-
son, Carole Anderson, Jean Erdall, Lavayne Finberg, Karen Knutsen and Florence Clough;
Precinct No. 15: Patricia Olander, Chairman, Anita Delegard, Kaye Luikens, Jean Hare,
Jean Moore, Betty McClain, Zelma Gray, Ann Bros, Beth Rosenbloom, Sharon Zeigbaum,
Carol Hanson, Alice Parten, Dorothy Patton, Lynn Westphal, Margaret Carlson, Alice
Rice and Helen Rumsey; Precinct No. 16: Judith Sotebeer, Chairman, Patricia Halvorson,
Kathryn Harrington, Donna Montgomery, Caroline Scott, Lucy Klos, Mary McDonald,
Bernadine Chapman, Marlyn Chase, Mary Ann Hans, Bonnie Bjerken, Elizabeth Johnson,
Nathalie Person, Ardus Windhorst, Ethel Anderson, and Diane Greensweig; Precinct No. 17:
Margaret Delaney, Chairman, Mary Shoquist, Joyce Koets, Lorna Livingston, Maryanne
Herman, Mary Ryan, Fay Clark, Susan Houston, Jean McDermid, Joanne Merta, Ann Singer,
Marie Bachman, Eleanor Amberg and Marion White; Precinct No. 18: Betty Doolittle,
Chairman, Selma Shelton, Gretchen Greene, Sheila Luff, Patricia MacCornack, Nancy
Huey, Elizabeth Genovese, Carolyn Bisson, Beverly Orr, Carol Phillips, Mary Ryan,
Mary Vanek, Mary Roeder and Harriet Bach; Precinct No. 19: Charlotte Scanlon, Chair-
man, Jean Altman, Audrey Nankivell, Erthel Johnson, Jean Vesper, Jane Hess, Lois
Cleveland, Ann Bieter, Alyse Sue Frishberg, Joann Mellem, Shirley Jenos, Helen
McClelland, Kay Murphy, Eileen Schaefer, Ann LaBovsky and Betty Jean Smith;
Alternate Judges: Carol Olson, Marguerite Sester, Phyllis Kilgore, Lorraine Shimek,
Mary Frintner, Eva Johnson, Lois Brown, Lorraine Purdy, Harriet Conkey, Sue Hirsch,
Lois Husbands, Marie Vorlicky, Cheryl Lushine, Mary Jo Griffin, JoAnne Chayer,
Edith Garmezy, Irene Helland, Carol Michalke, Ruth Schneider, Donna White, Mary
Rival, Annette Dammicci, Paula Harrison, Juline LeMire, Delores Paul, Avalda
Wildersmuth, Maxine Yaeger, June Goetz, Jane Fuegner, Hope Melton, Eunice Strunk,
Nancy Cummings, Del Possis, June Hunt, Barbara Erlandson, July Berglund, Rose
Marie Oss, Carol Rosenblatt, Ida Sommers, Rosemary Sweeney, Phyllis Taylor,
Marilyn Person, Ardis Wexler, Doris Peterson, Louise Thompson, Donna Brastad,
Barbara Boyd, Jaffe Bates, Carol Sturm, Jan Windhorst, Mary Lou Quimby, Helen
Brown, Mildred Pearson, Elaine Carlson, Mary Bridget Ratelle, Rebecca Rogers and
Jean Hutton.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
CANVASSING BOARD FOR GENERAL ELECTION APPOINTED. As recommended by the City Clerk,
Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION APPOINTING GENERAL ELECTION CANVASSING BOARD
BE-IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby appoints the following
as members of the Canvassing Board for the General /City Election to be held on
November 6, 1984: Mark Bernhardson, Ernest Buffington, Hilding Dahl, Harold
Habigorhst, Glenn Harmon, Jerry Hines, Ralph Hines, Rolland Lundberg, Harry Melin,
Sam Mobley, Howard Norback, Ernie Olson, Chester Ornat, Willard Ott and Alvin Woods.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk be and is hereby authorized to make any
substitutions or additions as may be necessary.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
RECOMMENDED TRANSFERS AND CANCELLATION OF LOAN AMOUNTS AUTHORIZED. Mr. Rosland
recalled that at the recent 1985 Budget meetings the Council had considered the
recommendations of Mr. Dalen, Finance Director, for cancellation of loans due to
the General Fund, Waterworks Fund, Liquor Fund and Permanent Improvement Revolving
Fund. Also, to close out balances in the Park Sinking Fund. These account will
be used to eliminate deficits in the following funds: Swimming Pool, Golf Course,
Recreation Center (Arena), Gun Range and Art Center. The Council had approved the
concept of funding any potential losses in these funds in the proposed budget to be
adopted October 1 of each year, rather than through loans from various funds. As
recommended by the Finance Director, Member Richards introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption, subject to the cumulative deficit amounts for
each fund being carried forward in the proposed budget each year:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TRANSFERS AND
CANCELLATION OF LOAN AMOUNTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council o'f the City of Edina that the Finance Director
be directed and authorized to make the following transfers and cancellation of
loan amounts:
Accounts Contributing Funds:
GENERAL FUND:
Loan to Recreation Center Fund
$200,000
WATERWORKS FUND:
Loan to General Fund
210,000
LIQUOR FUND:
Loan to Recreation Center Fund
$170,000
Loan to Golf Course Fund
245,000
415,000
PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT REVOLVING:
Loan to Recreation Center Fund
$100,000
Loan to Construction Fund
100,000
200,000
$1,025,000
PARK SINKING FUND:
Surplus balance at December 31, 1983 330,527
TOTAL CONTRIBUTED $1,355,527
Accounts To Which Funds Will be Applied:
Swimming Pool Fund $ 110,752
Recreation Center (Arena) (Golf Course Loan from Liquor Fund) 245,000
Recreation Center (Arena) Fund 497,966
Gun Range Fund 35,371
Art Center Fund 210,518
Construction Fund 100,000
General Fund 155,920
TOTAL APPLIED $1,355,527
10/1/84
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
COMBINATION OF FUNDS AND ESTABLISHMENT OF A WORKING CAPITAL FUND APPROVED. Mr. Dalen
reviewed a memorandum recommending the combination of funds and establishment of a
working capital fund. He explained that establishment of a working capital fund
would improve the City's bond rating and stated that this reserve fund would represent
about 48% of the Budget. Member Turner then offered the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING COMBINATION OF FUNDS
AND-ESTABLISHMENT OF A WORKING CAPITAL FUND
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the Finance Director be
directed and authorized as follows:
1) To combine the PARK FUND with the GENERAL FUND as of December 31, 1983;
2) To combine the Waterworks Fund and the Sewer Rental Fund as of December 31, 1984,
and to designate the new fund as the UTILITIES FUND.
3) To establish a TRUST FUND during 1984 for the purpose of holding funds to pay
1985 and 1986 installments for bonds and interest of Improvement Bond Redemption
Fund #1 as per the following schedule:
Service
Maturities Principal Interest Charge Total
1985 $300,000 $ 26,400. $ 100 $326,500
1986 300,000 13,200 100 313,300
$600,000 $ 39,600 $ 200 $639,800
4) To establish a WORKING CAPITAL FUND by transferring the remainder of the accounts
of the Improvement Bond Redemption Fund, and the Permanent Improvement Revolving
Funds as of December 31, 1984, as per the following cash and investment balances
at December 31,..1983:
Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund:
Cash $ 229,418
Improvement Bond Redemption Fund I:
Cash $.(274,819)
Investments 2,759,865 2,485,046
$2,714,464
Amount ndded for Trust Fund per above 639,800
TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS $2,074,664
Net special assessments receivable as of December 31, 1983 was about $2,540,000,
which will give the City a WORKING CAPITAL FUND of about $4,600.00.
5) To use any earnings of the WORKING CAPITAL FUND for Capital Improvement per
Capital Improvement Budget.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Schmidt.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Resolution carried.
1985 BUDGET OF $9,589,369 ADOPTED. Mr. Rosland observed that the Council Members
had thoroughly reviewed the proposed Budget for 1985 during four special meetings
held for that purpose, and had at the meeting on September 26, 1984, considered a
list of possible Reductions to the 1985 Budget. The Council Members reviewed the
list of possible reductions and discussion followed regarding dues to the League
of Minnesota Cities and APZl, legal fees, additional paramedic as recommended and
capital improvement funding. After considerable debate on the proposed reductions,
Member Bredesen moved that the proposed Budget for 1985 for the City of Edina be
reduced by $100,000. Motion was seconded by Mayor Courtney.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Courtney
Nays: Schmidt, Turner
Motion carried.
Member Bredesen then introduced the following resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION ADOPTING BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF EDINA
FOR THE YEAR 1985, AND ESTABLISHING TAX LEVY FOR
THE YEAR 1984 PAYABLE IN 1985
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Budget for the City of Edina for the calendar year 1985 is
hereby adopted as hereinafter set forth; and funds are hereby appropriated
therefor:
10/1/84
GENERAL FUND
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
Mayor and Council $ 37,723
Planning 139,578
Administration 318,187
Finance .233,435
Election 16,380
Assessing 217,650
Legal and Court Services 226,000
TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT
PUBLIC WORKS
Administration $ 81,038
Engineering 311,521
Highways 2,249,387
PROTECTION OF PERSONS AND PROPERTY
Police
Fire
Civilian Defense
Animal Control
Public Health
Inspection
TOTAL PROTECTION'OF
PERSONS AND PROPERTY
NON- DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
$2,394,519
1,473,840
31,060
45,384
207,523
159,594
$1,188,953
$2,641,946
$4,311,920
Contingencies $ 80,000
Special Assessments on City Property 75,000
Unallocated Capital Outlay 16,000
Capital Improvements 40,000
Commissions and Special Projects 78,591
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS AND $ 289,591
CONTINGENCIES
TOTAL GENERAL FUND $8,432,410
PARK FUND
Administration $ 379.,079
Recreation 99,900
Maintenance 477,980
Capital Outlay and Replacements 120,000
TOTAL PARK FUND $1,076,959
PARK CONSTRUCTION
Capital Outlay $ 80,000
Section 2. Estimated receipts
other than
General Tax Levy are hereby
established as hereinafter set
forth:
GENERAL FUND
Transfer - Revenue Sharing
Fund
$ 225,000
Licenses and Permits
397,600
Municipal Court Fines
325,000
Department Service Charges
; 486,040
Other
89,700
Transfer from Liquor Fund
95,000
State Apportionments - Sales Tax
550,787
Income on Investments
60,000
Aids - Other Agencies
154,905
.Police Aid
150,000
. TOTAL GENERAL
FUND
$2,534,032
PARK FUND
Registration Fees $ 32,000
Other 15,000
Transfer from General Fund 275,000
TOTAL PARK FUND $ 322,000
PARK CONSTRUCTION FUND
Transfer from General Fund 80,000
TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS $2,936,032
10/1/84
Section 3. That there be and hereby is levied upon all taxable real and personal
property in the City of Edina, a tax rate sufficient to produce the amounts
hereinafter set forth:
For General Fund
For Park Fund
$5,898,378
754,959
$6,653,337
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Mayor Courtney.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Courtney
,:.Nays: Schmidt, Turner
Resolution adopted.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
Member Bredesen then introducted the following resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION RATES
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby establish the following
salary schedule for fulltime personnel for 1985:
LIQUOR FUND REPORT as it July 31, 1984, was presented, reviewed and ordered
placed on file by motion of Member Turner, seconded by Member Schmidt.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Management III
$41,392
$45,006
$48,646
$51,740
Management II
-
30,940
33,644
36,348
38,662
Management I
26,052
28,340
30,628
32,578
Technical Management
23,764
25,844
27,924
29,718
Technical IV
21,008
22,854
24,674
26,260
Technical III
19,032
20,696
22,360
23,790
Technical II
18,668
20,280
21,918
23,322
Technical I
16,692
18,174
19,630
20,878 .
General III
15,626
16,978
18,356
19,526
General II
14,508
15,756
17,030.
18,122
General I
12,896
14,014
15,158
16,120
Public Safety
PS Management III
35,100
38,194
41,262
43,888
PS Management II
32,838
35,724
38,584
41,054
PS Management I
29,874
32,474
35,100
37,336
PS General II
18,252
19,864
21,450
22,828
PS General I
14,508
15,756
17,030
18,122
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED
that the
Edina City does hereby
establish
the
following
compensation schedule
for part
time personnel:
Year Round
Level A
Level B
Step 1
$4.20
$4.60
Step 2
4.55
5.10
Step 3
4.75
5.45
Step 4
5.05
5.60
Step 5
5.40
5.70
Managerial
$6.45
Seasonal
Level 1
$3.50
3.75
3.90
Level 2
3.65
3.95
4.15
Level 3
4.10
4.40
4.55
Level 4
4.40
4.65
4.80
Level 5
4.55
- 5.80
Motion for adoption
of the resolution
was seconded
by Member
Courtney.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards,
Schmidt, Turner,
Courtney
Resolution adopted.
LIQUOR FUND REPORT as it July 31, 1984, was presented, reviewed and ordered
placed on file by motion of Member Turner, seconded by Member Schmidt.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
10/1/84
CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Schmidt was seconded by Member Turner for payment
of the following claims as per Pre -List dated 10/1/84: General Fund $55,759.19,
Park Fund $12,729.63, Art Center $1,155.23, Swimming Pool Fund $3.05, Golf Course
Fund $6,417.11, Recreation Center Fund $1,616.02, Gun Range Fund $399.00, Water-
works Fund $10,079.80, Sewer Rental Fund $231.79, Liquor Dispensary Fund $1,158.98,
Construction Fund $11,420.68, IMP Bond Redemption Fund $319,767.00, IMP Bond
Redemption #2 $987.00, Total $421,724.48.
There being no further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the
meeting adjourned at 11 :30 p.m.
City Clerk
9
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
NOVEMBER 19, 1984
Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner and Mayor
Courtney.
MARCELLA DAEHN COMMENDED. Mr. Rosland commented that Marcella Daehn started working
for the City in January of 1977 as secretary to the City Manager and was appointed
as City Clerk in June of 1983. He commended her for her efforts in administering
the General /City Election held on.November 6, noting that it was an exceptionally
challanging election requiring paper ballots in addition.to the voting machines.
Mr. Rosland added that there is an excellent working relationship between her and
all departments of City Hall. A silver pen bearing the Edina Logo was presented to
her. Member of the Council added their commendation.
PUBLIC HEARING ON ZONING CHANGE FROM R -1 TO MD -5 FOR EDINBOROUGH CONTINUED TO 12/3/84.
As recommended by staff, Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Schmidt to
continue the public hearing on the zoning change from R -1 Single Dwelling Unit Dist-
rict to MD -5 Mixed Development District for Edinborough, generally located west of
York Avenue and south of West 76th Street, to the Council Meeting of December 3, 1984.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVED FOR OUR LADY OF GRACE CHURCH (5051 EDEN AVENUE SO.)
Mr. Hughes presented the petition of Our Lady of Grace Church for a Conditional Use
Permit, advising that the Church is proposing a 23,650 square foot addition to their
existing church building. This addition will house a new sanctuary, a small chapel,
meeting rooms and other related facilities. The existing sanctuary will be converted
into a gymnasium for use by Our Lady of Grace School. The proposed new sanctuary will
contain pew seating for 848 people and space for overflow seating for an additional
133 people. Mr. Hughes noted that the proposed addition requires few alterations to
the balance of the church property. No new parking lots are proposed and none are
required as a result of the addition. The current parking count exceeds Ordinance
requirements by about 127 spaces which should provide more than adequate parking.
The parking expansion shown on the site plan is not proposed as part of this project,
but may be constructed in the future if needed. Othen than a minor extention and
redevelopment of the main entry drive, no other changes to the balance of the site
are proposed. The church property is bordered by residential uses only on its south
side. The proposed new sanctuary will be located about 350 feet from the nearest
single family home to the south; existing landscaping effectively screens the pro-
posed addition from the homes to the south. Mr. Hughes pointed out that the new
Zoning Ordinance requires the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit prior to church
expansions. The request was heard by the Community Development and Planning Com-
mission on October 31, 1984. The Commission found that the findings required for
the issuance of the permit have been met and recommended approval. At the time the
Commission heard the proposal they did not review a landscape plan which has since
been supplied and been found by staff to meet the Ordinance requirements. John.
Justice, of Hammel, Green, and Abrahamson Architects, was present to answer questions.
No objections being heard, Member Richards introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
WHEREAS, the procedural requirements of Ordinance No. 825 (The Zoning Ordinance)
have been met, and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Findings as required by Ordinance No. 825
have been satisfied;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby grants a Conditional
Use Permit to Our Lady of Grace Church, at 5151 Eden Avenue, for construction of
a 23,650 square foot addition to their existing church building, according to plans
submitted.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Abstaining: Bredesen.
Resolution adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF VICTORSEN'S VALLEY VIEW 2ND ADDITION
CONTINUED TO 12/3/84; FINDINGS TO BE PREPARED. Mr. Hughes presented the petition of
Folke Victorsen for preliminary plat approval of Victorsen's Valley View 2nd Addition,
generally located south of Valley View Road and west of Brookview Avenue. The
applicant requests a two lot plat of two pre- existing unplatted parcels. The west-
erly unplatted parcel has been owned by the proponent for many years, is landlocked
and is,.therefore, unbuildable. The easterly unplatted parcel is developed with a
single dwelling unit building fronting on Brookview Avenue. This parcel was recently
acquired by the applicant. The proposed plat is requested to provide a 20 foot strip
P
_./ 1 / / -
across the easterly parcel to provide access for the westerly parcel. If approved,
a new single dwelling unit is proposed for the westerly lot. Mr. Hughes pointed
out that the proposed plat also requires the grant of a subdivision variance. The
Zoning Ordinance requires that the minimum lot width of 75 feet must be met at a
point 50 feet from the front lot line. The lot width of Parcel A of the new plat
measured 50 feet from the front lot line is 20 feet. Thus, a 55 foot variance is
needed. Apparently, the land composing the property in question was originally a
single parcel of property. The'westerly portion of the property was sold in 1956
to Southdale Center, Inc., thereby creating the westerly landlocked parcel. Staff
has been unable to find that the City approved the division caused by this 1956 sale
and also cannot determine the reason for Southdale's desire to own the property.
Mr. Hughes noted that in 1962, the applicant platted Victorsen's Valley View which
adjoins the landlocked parcel to the north. ,In the same year, the applicant con-
structed an eight unit apartment building on this property. On January 8, 1964,
the applicant acquired the landlocked parcel. Earlier this year, the applicant
acquired the easterly parcel which separates the landlocked parcel from Brookview
Avenue. He pointed out that the applicant no longer owns the apartment site.* The
proposed new lot is located about 45 feet from the Garrison Lane cul -de -sac. To
gain access to Garrison Lane, the applicant would need to acquire property from the
homeowner to the west which he has been unable to do. Mr. Hughes advised that both
the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance have policies and standards which pro-
hibit the type of subdivision that is being proposed. The principal question in
this case revolves around the requested variance and the City's determination as to
the existence of unique circumstances and undue hardship while recognizing the
spirit and intent of the Ordinance. Council should be aware of several points in
making this determination: 1) the division which created the westerly landlocked
parcel apparently was not approved by the City; 2) the landlocked parcel is not a
"non- conforming lot ", i.e. a lot which complies with our Ordinances when created,
but which does not now comply due only to a change in the Ordinance and has always
been unbuildable, 3) the landlocked parcel and the easterly parcel have now, in,
essence, been combined by virture of their present common ownership into one, con-
.forming lot, and 4) the landlocked parcel could be accessed better from Garrison
Lane as the access would be shorter and would likely result in a more logical
orientation of a new building. Mr. Hughes stated that the Development and Planning
Commission had reviewed the request at their October 31, 1984 meeting and recommended
that the subdivision should be denied. He noted that Tom Goodman,.of Grossman,
Karlins, Siegel and.Brill, was present to represent the applicant. Mr. Goodman re-
viewed the history of Parcel A and presented arguments in support of the requested
variance for the neck lot: 1) that the Victorsens at the time.of the sale of the
apartment building to the north in 1970 had no knowledge that the lot division
created in. -1956 when Parcel A was sold to Southdale had not been approved by the
City, 2) that both parcels as.proposed.meet.the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance
in and of themselves in this R -1 Single Family Dwelling Unit District, 3) that only
a single family home is being proposed to be build on Parcel A and 4) that the pro-
posed home will not interfere with any surrounding property. Mr. and Mrs. Folke
Victorsen commented that they had removed many diseased elm trees and have cleaned
up the lot in'general and that they now.were requesting.the variance -for the plat
with the intent of building only a single family home on Parcel A and that their
initial plan for a double bungalow has been dropped. Speaking in opposition to
the proposed plat and variance were Garth Holmes, 6220 Brookview Avenue, who pre -
sented a petition signed by 30 residents of the immediate area on Brookview, and
Neal Swant, 4428 Garrison Lane. Arguments in opposition were that approving this
variance for a neck lot would set a precedence for other properties, that there is
no provision for storing snow from the long access driveway to Parcel A, and that
the residents on Brookview Avenue were strongly opposed. There being no further
comments, Member Bredesen moved that the staff be directed to prepare Findings,
Decision and Reasons in support of the recommendation of the Planning Commission
and staff for denial of preliminary plat approval and the subdivision variance .
and to bring back the Findings to the Council at its meeting of.December 3, 1984.
Motion was seconded by Member Turner, commenting that the Council and staff had
spent considerable time discussing neck lots when.adopting the Comprehensive Plan
and the Zoning Ordinance and that there were no unusual circumstances to warrant
approval.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
FINAL PLAT APPROVED FOR VALLEY VIEW HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION: Mr. Hughes presented the
petition for Final Plat approval for Valley View Heights 2nd Addition, generally
located south of Valley View Road, east of Tracy Avenue and adjoining the Crosstown
Highway on the south. Council granted preliminary plat approval on July 16, 1984.
Mr. Hughes advised that there has been a change between the preliminary plat sub-
mitted and the final plat. Both of the plats proposed five single family lots;
however, in the preliminary plat there was a small cul -de -sac proposed just off
Valley View Road that would provide access to four of the lots. The proposed final
11/19/84
plat suggests that there simply be five conventional lots that front onto Valley
View Road. He-noted that a considerable portion of Lot 5 as well as portions of
Lots 3 and 4 would be subject to drainage easements for ponding purposes. From
staff's viewpoint, it is not considered a significant change from the preliminary
plat and would recommend approval, subject to subdivision dedication and a signed
developer's agreement. No objections being heard, Member Richards introduced the
following resolution and moved its adoption, subject to execution of a developer's
agreement and subdivision dedication to the City in the amount of $8,000.00:
RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL
FOR VALLEY VIEW HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "Valley View Heights.2nd Addition ", platted by Kent P. Swanson
and Sharon J. Swanson, husband and wife, and Paul C. Kingbay and Carol E. Kingbay,
husband and wife, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of
November 19, 1984, be and is hereby granted final plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
FINAL FLAT APPROVED FOR SVANOE ADDITION ( SVANOE REPLAT). Mr. Hughes presented the
petition for Final Plat approval for Svanoe Addition, generally located south of
West 70th Street and east of Lanham Lane. The proposed plat received preliminary
approval from the Council on December 19, 1983. A condition to that approval was
that the owner execute and deliver to the City a declaration of restrictive cove-
nants prohibiting construction of any house, porch or deck, on that part of the
Westerly lot of Carolane Addition lying Southwesterly of a line drawn parallel
with and 124 feet Southwesterly of the Northeasterly line of the lot. Mr. Hughes
advised that the declaration has been prepared, approved by the City Attorney and
signed by the owners of the property and staff would recommend final approval,
subject to subdivision dedication. No objections being heard, Member Bredesen
introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject to subdivision
dedication in the amount of $2,000.00 to the City:
RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL
FOR SVANOE ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain
plat entitled "Svanoe Addition ", platted by William R. Svanoe and Myrtle A. Svanoe,
husband and wife, owners and proprietors and Richfield Bank and Trust Company,.a
Minnesota corporation, mortgagee, and presented at the regular meeting of the City
Council of November.19, 1984, be and is hereby granted final plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Abstaining: Schmidt
Resolution adopted.
BID AWARDED FOR SIX FULL -SIZED SEDANS FOR POLICE USAGE. Mr. Rosland presented tabu-
lation of bids for six full -sized sedans for police usage showing Suburban Chevrolet
at $10,831.00 per vehicle, total of $64,986.00, Thane - Hawkins Polar Chevrolet at
$10,886.00 per vehicle, total of $65,316.00, and Brookdale Ford at $10,967.75 per
vehicle, total of $65,806.50. Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Bredesen
for award of bid to recommended low bidder, Suburban Chevrolet, for $64,986.00.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards,- Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
TRAFFIC SAFETY.COMMITTEE.MINUTES OF 11/13/84 APPROVED. No comment being heard,
Member Bredesen's motion.was seconded by Member Turner to approve the following
recommended action as listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes
of November 13, 1984:
1) That additional curve and advisory speed signs be erected on Gleason Road near
Scotia Drive,
and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
OFF -SALE BEER LICENSE APPROVED FOR HOLIDAY STATION STORE AT 50TH STREET & INTERLACHEN.
Mr. Rosland advised that an application has been received for an Off -sale Beer License
for the Holiday Station Store at W. 50th Street and Interlachen Boulevard. The
application has been approved by the Police Department and Coucil approval is recom-
mended. No comments being heard, Member Bredesen moved approval of an Off -sale Beer
License for the Holiday Station Store at 5200 Interlachen Boulevard. Motion was
seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
11/19/84
BOARD OF REVIEW TO MEET ON MAY 13, 1985. As recommended by staff, Member Bredesen's
motion was seconded by Member Richards setting May 13, 1985 at 5:00 p.m. as the date
for the Board of Review to hear all persons considering themselves aggrieved by their
assessment.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
COMMISSIONER -ELECT JOHN KEEFE INTRODUCED TO COUNCIL. John Keefe, County Commissioner -
Elect for.the Third District, introduced himself to the Council Members, assuring them
that he would continue the fine representation of Edina on the Board that Commissioner
Kremer had given. He asked that Council Members convey any concerns to him and
promised that he would in the same manner convey anything he felt would affect the
City of Edina to the Council. He offered to meet with the Council periodically to
discuss the mutual concerns and problems that may confront the City. Mayor Courtney
suggested that Commissioner Keefe continue to meet with the City Manager as his
predecessor had done. No action was taken.
1985 HOLIDAY SCHEDULE FOR CITY EMPLOYEES APPROVED. Mr. Rosland presented a proposed
schedule of 1985 Holidays for City employees and commented that there is no change -
from previous years. Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Schmidt approving
the following schedule of holidays for 1985:
New Year's Day (January 1) Veterans' Day (November 11)
Presidents' Day (February 18) Thanksgiving Day (November 28)
Good Friday (April 5) Friday after Thanksgiving Day (November 29)
Memorial Day (May 27) Christmas Eve Day (December 24 -2 day)
Independence Day (July 4) _ Christmas Day (December 25)
Labor Day (September 2) New Year's Eve Day (December 31 -z day)
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner,. Courtney
Motion carried.
AMM GENERAL MEETING DATE NOTED. Mayor Courtney advised that the General-Meeting of
the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities would be held on Thursday, December 6,
1984, at Richfield City Hall, starting at 7:30 p.m. and that all Council Members are
invited to attend. He stated that Mr. Rosland and he would be attending the meeting.
Mr. Rosland called Council's attention to the proposed Legislative Policies of the
AMM which had been included in the Council packets and asked that the Council Members
let him know if they differed with the AMM policies on -the various issues so that
the Council's position could be presented. No action was taken.
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL PROPOSED HOUSING CHAPTER DISCUSSED. Member Turner advised that
the Metropolitan Council has drafted a revision of their Housing Chapter and that
she had asked Mr. Hughes to summarize the document. Mr. Hughes advised that a hearing
will be held by the Metropolitan Council on November 29, 1984, to determine if the
Housing Chapter should be adopted. He presented graphics and gave an overview of
the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities's (AMM) recommendations regarding the
revised Housing Chapter of the Metropolitan Council as follows:
1) Community Index - Should be used only as a planning tool, not a regulatory tool.
2; 1ife_Cycle Housing - Should be viewed on a regional basis, not a community basis.
3) Resonsibility for.Subsidized Housing - Fund-should not be the obligation -of the
cities.
4) Influences of Market Place on Housing - Metro Council should recognize and discuss
the role of the market place over which cities have little control.
5) Local Plan Monitoring - Metro Council should not be an overseer of the implementa-
tion of local comprehensive plans.
Mr. Hughes noted that the Housing Chapter also contains a proposed Legislative Agenda
for the coming year on the issues of taxation, preservation of existing housing,
special needs, housing revenue bonds, landlord /tenant relations and local initiatives.
He recommended that the City should appear at the hearing on November 29 to testify
as follows: 1) That the AMM's recommendations should be endorsed, 2) that the
Community Index is a good planning tool but should not be implemented as a regulatory
tool, and 3) that the proposed Legislative Agenda.is premature and should not be
pursued by the Metropolitan Council. Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member
Bredesen that the City of Edina appear at the Metro Council hearing on November 29
and testify as recommended by staff.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
MLC JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT AMENDMENT RATIFIED. Mr. Rosland advised that the Municipal
Legislative Commission has asked each city council to ratify an amendment to the
Joint Powers agreement which authorizes an increase in the financial contributions
to the Commission. Member Schmidt moved the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby ratifies the following amendment
to the Municipal Legislative Commission's Joint Powers agreement:
11/19/84
"XI. FINANCIAL MATTERS
Section 2. The financial contributions of the Parties in support of the Commission
shall be per capita. Each of the Parties shall pay to the Commission an amount as
annually determined by the Commission not to exceed $0,35 per capita by February 15,
of each year based on the most'recent Metropolitan Council population estimates,
however, no individual municipality shall contribute more than $14,000 per year.
This amount may be used by the Commission to pay all legal and consultant costs and
expenses and other expenses as approved by the Board. The Board may authorize changes
in the per capita charge for all members upon majority vote."
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
•Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
CITY.HALL SPACE:NEEDS.TO BE STUDIED. Member Richards advised that in response to
the Council's request that Member Turner and he coordinate a study of City Hall
space needs, they have prepared a questionnaire to be completed by all City
Departments to.solicit. background information regarding present accomodations,
whether they need to be upgraded, expanded, contracted, consolidated with other
governmental functions, whether city, school, state, etc. Mr. Rosland stated he had
asked the staff to look at their space needs and they would respond..to the question-
naire. Member Turner added that when the information obtained from the question-
naire is brought back to the Council that the next step would to proceed with
appointment of a committee. It was unanimously agreed by the Council to proceed
with the questionnaire, asking that responses by completed and returned by no
later. than December 31, 1984.
RESIGNATION FROM SHHSC NOTED. Member Turner informed the Council that Sally Tang,
one of the appointees to the South Hennepin Human Services Council has resigned
leaving an opening on that board for her unexpired term to 2 -1 -85. The board
would like to fill the vacancy as soon as possible and after discussion.:it_ was
agreed that.the Council Members should submit names for.consideration to the Mayor
so that the position could be filled as soon as possible. Member Turner mentioned
that Sally Tang also sat on the Hennepin County Community Health Services Committee.
Member Schmidt advised that Barbara Reynolds, Chairman of the Edina Advisory Board
of Health, has applied for that position, being nominated by the Third District
Nursing Association and would be excellent for that committee. Mr. Rosland stated
he would. contact Commissioner Kremer or Commissioner -Elect Keefe and ask them to
support the nomination.
SEMINAR FOR LOCAL OFFICIALS ON DEALING WITH METROPOLITAN AGENCIES NOTED. Mayor
Courtney stated he received an announcement of a seminar to be conducted by Gene
Franchett, former Executive Director of the Metro Council, on "How to Deal With
Metropolitan Agencies." Anyone interested should contact the City Manager. No
action tias taken.
WOODDALE SCHOOL SITE HEARING PROCESS OUTLINED. Mr. Rosland informed the Council
that the consultants on the Wooddale School site have proposed several alternatives
for the site. Recommended procedure would be to hold two informational meetings
at Wooddale School approximately a week apart (January 8 and January 15) at which
the consultants would present their report and recommendations to area residents
and other interested persons. A public hearing then would then be scheduled for
the Council Agenda at the Council Meeting of February 4, 1985. The informational
meetings would be advertised-and letters would be sent to area residents informing
them of the dates and advising that the meetings are not public hearings. Required
notice would then be given for the public hearing. Recommended area to be notified
would be from Halifax Avenue to Highway 100 and from W. 44th Street to W. 54th
Street. After discussion, the Council informally agreed to proceed with the hear
ing process as outlined by Mr. Rosland.
WINE REFERENDUM /LICENSING DISCUSSED. As a follow -up to the recent advisory poll.
on the issue of wine licenses at the November 6, 1984, General Election, Mr. Rosland
asked for direction by the Council as to what the staff should do in anticipation
of a request that the issue of Wine Licenses be placed on the Council Agenda. Member
Richards responded that in light of the poll results he felt a draft ordinance should
be prepared which would include all the possibilities of how to regulate wine lic-
censes, control measures, possible locations involved, etc. Attorney Erickson
pointed out that another aspect to consider would be the license fee in relationship
to the fee for liquor licenses at the City's country clubs. He noted also that a
local ordinance can be more restrictive than the State Statute. Member Bredesen
submitted that he felt any costs involved should be borne by the people who will
benefit from the issuance of wine licenses. Mr. Rosland stated that staff will keep
track of the costs incurred by staff and counsel. No formal action was taken.
11/19/84
REPORT GIVEN ON APPEAL TO STATE OF MINNESOTA REGARDING COUNTY'S INCREASE IN ASSESSED
EVALUATIONS FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES IN EDINA. Mr. Rosland stated that an order has
been received from the Minnesota Department of Revenue in response to the City's
appeal regarding the 3% increase set by Hennepin County on evaluations of single
family homes. The order stated that the request for a lower evaluation is denied.
Assessor Johnson pointed out that, subsequently, ratios have come out.for all
municipalities in Hennepin County and it appears that Edina is lowest in the County
after the 3% increase. He explained that this community and a few others are the
only ones experiencing any overall growth in value. No action was taken.
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORES NET INCOME REVIEWED. Mr. Rosland advised that the mer-
chandising approach the City has been working toward has started to pay dividends
and that the net income is up $58,510..00 in the first nine months. No action taken.
STAFF WISHES COUNCIL A HAPPY THANKSGIVING. Mr. Rosland extended the wishes of the
staff to the Council Members for a Happy Thanksgiving Holiday.
ORDINANCE NO. 1353 -A1 (MASSAGE /SAUNA ORDINANCE) ADOPTED ON SECOND READING. Council
was reminded that First Reading of Ordinance No. 1353 -A1 was given at the meeting
of November 5, 1985. No objections being heard, Member Schmidt moved Second-Reading
and adoption of the ordinance as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1353 -A1
AN AMENDMENT TO THE ORDINANCE LICENSING AND REGULATING
PHYSICAL CULTURE AND HEALTH SERVICES AND CLUBS, REDUCING
CLUBS AND SALONS, MASSAGE PARLORS, SAUNA PARLORS, AND
ESCORT SERVICES, TO EXEMPT CERTAIN BUSINESSES FROM THE
REQUIREMENT TO OBTAIN A LICENSE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Exemption from Business License Requirements. Section 2 of
Ordinance No. 1353 is hereby amended by adding thereto a new paragraph (c) as
follows:
"(c) The preceding provisions of this section notwithstanding, no business
as described in this section shall be required to obtain a license under this
section if it meets all of the following criteria as evidenced by affidavits
and other documents, including that set out at 4. below, submitted to and in
form and substance reasonably acceptable to the City Clerk:
1. The principal activity of the business shall not be the performance of
massage services;
2. The activity of the business is conducted and performed on the business
premises;
3. No more than two persons licensed to perform massage services under this
ordinance shall perform such massage services at any one time on the
business premises; and
4. The annual gross revenue of the business from performing massage services
is less than 25% of the total annual gross revenue of the business as
shown by financial statements of the kind.specified in Section 4 (a) 10
of this ordinance."
Sec. 2. There is hereby added to paragraph (a) of Section 4, a new subpara-
graph 10 as follows:
"10. A financial statement, certified as true and correct by an independent
accountant, showing the gross income of the business to be licensed
for the then last three fiscal years of such business, or shorter
period of time that applicant may have been in the business to be
licensed, itemized as to each activity of the business, including
without limitation, the gross income from performing massage services."
Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its
passage and publication.
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Ordinance adopted.
ATTEST: Mayor
City Clerk
LIQUOR FUND REPORTS as of August 31, 1984 and September 30, 1984, were presented,
reviewed and ordered placed on file by motion of Member Turner, seconded by Member
Schmidt.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
11/19/84
CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Turner, was seconded by Member Schmidt for confir-
mation of payment of the following claims dated 10/31/84: General Fund $178,028.54,
Park Fund $1,321.99, Art Center $254.67, Swimming Pool Fund $10,819.42, Golf
Course Fund 7,404.60, Recreation Center Fund $2,506.95, Gun Range Fund $235.64,
Waterwork Fund $3,909.21, Sewer Rental Fund $160.99, Liquor Dispensary Fund
$281,659.21, IMP Bond Redemption !12 $606.00, Total $286.907.42; and for payment
of the following claims as per Pre -List dated 11/19/84: General Fund $155,781.50,
Park Fund $21,560.74, Art Center $8,838.65, Swimming Pool Fund $6,801.75,
Golf Course Fund $5,460.17, Recreation Center Fund $8,041.60, Gun Range Fund
$466.52, Waterwork Fund $22,239.96, Sewer Rental Fund $3,998.95, Liquor
Dispensary Fund $95,901.19, Construction Fund $61,570.40, I`IP Bond Redemption
r2 $3,433.09, Total $394,094.52.
There being no further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting
adjourned at 8:50 p.m.
City Clerk
I -A
January 4, 1985
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, City Engineer��
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: France Avenue Reconstruction - W. 492 Street to Excelsior Blvd.
The background on this project dates back many years. Various attempts
have been made to improve the roadway noted above. The various agencies
involved have struggled to reach an agreement on the type of roadway to
be reconstructed. The Minnesota Department of Transportation currently
controls this segment of roadway as Highway 121. The Department ( MNDOT)
is currently turning back many roadways- which no longer serve a high-
way function. Previously MNDOT turned back the portion of France.Avenue
between W. 50th Street and West 54th Street to the cities of Edina and
Minneapolis, without any reconstruction.
The current effort to improve the roadway is a joint effort of Minnesota.
Department of Transportation, ( MNDOT) Hennepin County, Edina, St. Louis
Park and Minneapolis, MNDOT has programmed funds for a portion of the
improvement costs. However, they have determined that the project should
be conducted by another agency. The City of Minneapolis has agreed to
be the lead agency on the project.
The various agency staff members have met several times to determine a
preliminary plan which could be acceptable to Hennepin County. The
purpose to seeking County approval is the belief that the roadway should
be a continuation of existing County Road 17 (France Avenue from W. 54th
Street to Old Shakopee Road in Bloomington).
The Edina staff has met with the neighbors to determine their reaction
to the project. For most part, the proposed roadway width and parking is
not an issue with the neighbors. However, there seems to be very little
support for any additional sidewalk. Staff will present more detailed
findings at the Council meeing.
Finally, the purpose of .the hearing Monday evening, is to consider a
preliminary plan approval relating to general design and consider
processing a variance request to the State for a width variance (see
attached document).
Also, enclosed are the various notices sent to neighbors and a timetable
received from the City of Minneapolis.
0
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PERRY D. SMITH, P.E.
CITY ENGINEER•DIRECTOR
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55415
JAMES H. LIND. DEPUTY CITY ENGINEER
J. M. ELLES - DIRECTOR, ADMINISTRATION
J. F. HAYEK . DIRECTOR, WATER WORKS
M. A. HOSHAW - DIRECTOR, ENGRG. DESIGN
D. R. KOSKI - DIRECTOR, TRAFFIC ENGRG.
M.J. KROENING • DIRECTOR, GEN. SERVICES
B. J. LOKKESMOE • DIRECTOR, OPERATIONS
A. E. MADISON • MANAGER, FINANCE
T. B. SADLER - SUPERINTENDENT, EQUIPMENT
Mr. Fran Hoffman
Director of Public Works
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, Minnesota
0 no
Hulmiumpmun
Fad ol� hhn
December 4, 1984
Re: France Avenue South (W. 49 112 Street - Excelsior Boulevard)
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
The purpose of this letter is to submit to you the draft Engineering Agreement,
the Draft Variance Request, our Draft City Council Resolution, and Layout No. 5C for
the France Avenue reconstruction project for your comments /approval . If necessary, we
can meet on this later this month.
The Draft Variance Request will be expanded to include a Capacity Analysis
prepared by our Traffic Engineering Division. The initial analysis showed that there
is an adequate Level of Service within the area between W. 49 112 Street and W. 44th
Street.
E
t—,
ac
The following schedule seems reasonable at this time:
Engineering Design Agreement
Variance Approval
Completion of Design
Construction Agreement
Approval Processing
Letting
Contract Award
a
February 1, 1985
April 15, 1985
August 1, 1985
December 1, 1985
December 1, 1985
February 1, 1986
April 1, 1986
Q�nunnu ��
,� • A A � � 11�f -.
Dili �il
r Ili r.
arc
Fran Hoffman
December 4, 1984
Page 2
I intend to submit the layout for Minneapolis City Council approval in the last
half of December. I would like to proceed with the variance request as soon as I know
that it and the layout are satisfactory to you and your Council.
If you have questions or comments please contact me at 348 -6588, or Jodi Polzin
at 348 -7565.
Very truly yours,
lw---i
Robert S. Morgan, P. E.
Engineer III, Planning and Programming
Engineering Design and Planning
RSM:J MP:gb
cc: C'. E. Wei ch sel baum
J : M. Wol d
Richard Koppy
a
REQUEST FOR VARIANCE
FROM STATE -AID STANDARDS
to the
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
f or
FRANCE AVENUE
Between
W. 49 1/2 STREET AND EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD
S.P. 141 - 332 -01
Presented by
The City of Edina
The City of Minneapolis
The City of St. Louis Park
November, 1984
0
Im
TABLE OF CONTENTS
STANDARD FROM WHICH VARIANCE IS REQUESTED . ...............................
DESCRIPTIONOF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT ....... ...............................
REASONSFOR REQUEST OF VARIANCE ........... ...............................
ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, SAFETY & ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
WHICH MAY RESULT FROM REQUESTED VARIANCE....
EFFECTIVENESS OF PROJECT IN ELIMINATING AN
EXISTING DEFICIENCY............
......... ...............................
EFFECTON ADJACENT LAND ................... ...............................
NUMBEROF PERSONS AFFECTED ................ ...............................
SAFETYCONSIDERATIONS ..................... ...............................
CONCLUSION................................ ...............................
APPENDIX
A. PROJECT LOCATION MAP .............. ...............................
B. EXISTING CROSS SECTIONS ........... ...............................
C. PROPOSED CROSS SECTIONS ........... ...............................
The cities of Minneapolis, Edina, and St. Louis Park hereby request a variance
from Minnesota Rules, Chapter 8820.9912 and 8820.9913, effective March 26, 1984. Rule
8820.9912 requires that High Density Arterials, undivided, with one side parking have
a curb - to-curb width of 62 ft., and that Low Density Arterials, undivided, with one
side parallel parking have a curb - to-curb width of 38 feet. Rul a 8820.9913 def ines
any roadway with an Average Daily Traffic in excess of 10,000 vehicles per day as a
High Density Arterial requiring four travel lanes. A variance from these standards is
requested for France Avenue from W. 49 1/2 Street to Excelsior Boulevard.
France Avenue, a North /South arterial street, serves as the City Limits of Edina,
St. Louis Park, and Minneapolis. Specifically it is the Edina /Minneapolis boundary
between W. 50th Street and W. 40th Street, and the St. Louis Park /Minneapol is boundary
between W. 40th Street and Excelsior Boulevard. High volumes of traffic travel along
this roadway, which has two lanes, is in poor condition, has poor drainage, and lacks
curb in segments. The cities of Edina, St. Louis Park, and Minneapolis, jointly,
propose to reconstruct France Avenue between W. 49 1/2 Street and Excelsior Boulevard.
The project will be designed in the following segments:
A. West 49 1/2 Street to W. 44th Street.
France Avenue, along this segment, is considered a High Density Arterial per
Minnesota Rule 8820.9913. It presently is a 42 foot wide, two-lane street
with parking allowed on both sides. No width changes are proposed for the
length between W. 49 1/2 Street and W. 45th Street. At W. 45th Street the
street will widen to 48 feet to allow for parking on both sides.
Improvements include new curb and gutter, reconstruction of the roadway, new
1
lighting, and reconstruction of the sidewalk in areas where the roadway
widens.
B. W. 44th Street to W. 39th Street.
This segment is a Low Density Arterial per 8820.9913. The present width
varies between 32 feet and 42 feet with parking allowed on both sides. The
roadway between W. 44th Street and Morningside Road will be widened to 48
feet. Parking will be allowed on both sides. The segment between
Morningside Road and W. 39th Street will be reconstructed at 40 feet, with
parking allowed on one side. Improvents include reconstruction of the
roadway, new curb and gutter, new sidewalk along the west side, and new
lighting.
C. W. 39th Street to Excel sior Boulevard.
This segment is also considered a Low Density Arterial. The present roadway
is 33 feet wide with parking allowed. The proposal is to widen this to 36
feet. Parking will be allowed on one side. Improvements include
reconstruction of the roadway, new curb and gutter, and new lighting.
pv:mcs 0: : _I a aw, :.:►6
Variances from Minnesota Rule 8820.9912 and 8820.9913, Urban State Aid Streets,
are requested for this street improvement. The segment from W. 49 1/2 Street to W.
44th Street requires a variance from the required number of through lanes for a High
Density Arterial Urban Street. The proposal is to design two through lanes rather
than four, as required. West 39th Street to Excelsior Boulevard requires a variance
E
from the required curb -to -curb width of 38 feet to a width of 36 feet.
A. W. 49 1/2 Street to W. 44th Street.
The present Average Daily Traffic (ADT) is 11,100 vehicles /day. This is
projected to increase to 12,250 vehicles/day in 20 years. Section 8820.9913,
Urban Roadway Classification, defines routes with this level of traffic as a
High Density Arterial Roadway. However, the Facility Function and Design
Character for France Avenue is more accurately reflected in the description
of a Low Density Arterial Roadway, "a roadway which serves intra- community
travel, augments high density arterial system, has some access control with
emphasis on traffic mobility." Section 8820.9912 requires that two lane, Low
Density Arterial Roadway have a curb - to-curb width of 38 feet with one side
parking, and 48 feet with two side parking. The proposed France Avenue
design between W. 49 1/2 Street and W. 45th Street exceeds the Low Density
Arterial Roadway standard with a curb - to-curb width of 42 feet with one side
parking, and between W. 45th Street and W. 44th Street is meets the standard
of 48 feet with two side parking. It is anticipated that the existing
satisfactory level of service will be maintained or improved after completion
of this project.
This section of France Avenue presently is a 42 foot wide, two lane street.
The , purpose of this project is to improve the condition of the roadway. As
described above, State Aid standards require that a roadway which conveys
similar volumes of traffic, have a minimum of four through lanes. Allowing
for parking on one side, this would require a curb - to-curb width of 62 feet.
The existing Right -of -Way is 63 feet. Abiding by this requirement would
necessitate acquisition of a significant amount of Right -of -Way. This is not
physically possible in the commercial area at France Avenue and W. 44th
3
Street. It would also create the need for retaining walls in a majority of
the area, which will further increase the cost of the project.
B. W. 44th Street to W. 39th Street.
A variance is not requested for this segment of the project.
C. W. 39th Street to Excelsior Boulevard.
This segment of France Avenue is presently 33 feet wide. This project would
widen this to 36 feet. The 36 foot width allows for two 12 foot through
lanes and one ten foot parking lane plus a two foot reaction between the
travel lane and the curb. The required width is 38 feet.
Abiding by the width requirements will create the greatest impact to the
abutting properties between W. 39th Street and W. 38th Street. As proposed
the street is being widened by three feet. In addition, the curb will be
tapered at W. 38th Street to allow a shift in the parking lane from the east
side of France Avenue to the west side. An additional three feet is required
to accommodate this taper. The total impact to the abutting property at
W. 38th Street is a widening of six feet. Abiding by the width standard
would involve a total widening of five feet to eight feet between W. 39th
Street and W. 38th Street. The proposed project will have less impact on the
abutting properties than the required design.
The impact which would result from reconstructing France Avenue, as proposed, is
discussed below:
4
Economic Impact
If this variance is denied there would be a significant increase in the
project cost." Widening the segment from W. 49 1/2 Street to W. 44th Street to
four lanes would require additional Right -of -Way, relocation of existing
sidewalk, retaining wall construction, regrading of front lawns, and additional
road construction. The project cost would increase by approximately $ 77
Widening the segment between W. 39th Street to Excelsior Boulevard would require
additional construction which would further increase the construction cost by
approximately $ 2DncD. This total of approximately $ JTL oul d not be
expended if this variance is granted. Removal of parking at W. 44th Street and
France Avenue would have a negative economic impact on the businesses which rely
on this parking for their customers
Reconstruction of France Avenue between W. 49 1/2 Street and Excelsior
Boulevard as proposed will have a positive social impact. The general appearance
will improve after completion of the construction. Reconstruction as required
may have a negative social impact on the generally residential nature of France
Avenue. Increasing the number of lanes may increase the amount of traffic
between W. 49 1/2 Street and W. 44th Street.
There will be a postive safety impact associated with the proposed design.
Placing of curbs where none presently exist, and removal of parking will improve
the safety of France Avenue. The design is a safe design, allowing for 12 foot
through lanes, and 10 foot parking lanes, plus two foot reaction between the
5
through lanes and either the curb, or the parking lanes.
The proposed project includes a realignment of W. 38th Street at the
intersection of France Avenue. This street is presently offset at France Avenue
and is the cause of accidents. The proposed design realigns W. 38th Street in an
effort to reduce the number of accidents and create a safer intersection.
L K.J
ORMERMSE1 l e 1• . -i I-
France Avenue between W. 49 1/2 Street and Excelsior Boulevard is generally
in poor condition. There are areas where curbs are non - existent and areas with
drainage probl ems. The poor roadway surface is not compatible with the heavy bus
usage between W. 49 1/2 Street and W. 39th Street. There is no record of any
permanent pavement between W. 44th Street and Excelsior Boulevard. There was an
overlay to France Avenue from W. 49 1/2 Street to W. 44th Street in 1954,
however, there is no record of when, if ever, any base was placed. The proposed
project improves these conditions, and allows for wider through lanes, and
sufficient separation between the parked vehicles and the moving traffic.
-i :• •
As proposed, there is little detrimental effect on the adjacent land.
However, constructing the segments to required standards between W. 49 1/2 Street
and 42nd Street will require acquisition of Right -of -Way by the City of Edina.
As proposed the City of Edina need only acquire Right -of -Way between Morningside
Avenue and 42nd Street.
G
Traffic patterns will not significantly be affected by replacement of the
roadway, therefore the number of persons affected by this project will be limited
to those who are daily users. The projected ADT for France Avenue between W. 49
1/2 Street and W. 44th Street is 12,250 vehicles /day. For the segment between
W. 44th Street and W. 39th Street the projected ADT is 9,750 vehicles /day. The
segment between W. 39th Street and Excelsior Boulevard has a projected ADT of
7,500. Buses travel between W. 49 1/2 Street and W. 39th Street. There are
buses per day and approximately passengers per day.
The safety of the moving vehicles are considered in designing the width of the
through lanes at 12 feet. The safety of the pedestrian is considered by having
sidewalk on at least one side of France Avenue for the entire length between W. 49 1/2
Street and Excel s-ior Boulevard. The extra width of two feet over the required width
between Morningside Road and W. 39th Street allows for a vehicle to pass a bus at a
bus stop without moving into the oncoming traffic lane.
France Avenue between W. 49 1/2 Street and Excelsior Boulevard presently is a two
lane roadway, with two side parallel parking allowed, located in a predominately
residential area with a commercial district at W. 44th Street. The roadway is
generally in poor condition. The proposed project will improve the condition of the
VA
road, widen (in sections), remove some parking, and provide for 12 foot through lanes.
This will allow continuation or improvement of the existing level of service. Abiding
by the standards contained In Minnesota Rules 8820.9912 and 8820.9913 would further
widen the roadway, resulting in a more costly project, requiring additional
Right -of -Way, removing mature trees, replacing retaining walls, and removing all the
parking.
This design has been developed and agreed to by Edina, Minneapolis, and St. Louis
Park. If this Variance Request is not granted, it is likely that the project will not
proceed. France Avenue is in poor condition and will worsen in time if this project
is not completed. Granting this Variance will allow the negotiated design to proceed.
T
RF.SOLUT T ON
WHEREAS, the City of Edina, in cooperation with the Cities of Minneapolis and
St. Louis Park, wishes to reconstruct France Avenue between W. 492 Street and
Excelsior Boulevard, in part using Municipal State -Aid funds; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation Rule 8820.9912 requires
that-France Avenue between W. 492 Street and W. 44th Street have a minimum of
four lanes; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation Rule 8820.9912 requires that
France Avenue between W. 39th Street and Excelsior Boulevard have a minimum
curb -to -curb width of 38 feet; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina believes there are valid reasons for constructing
France Avenue to a lower design standard and that such lower design standard
will safely and adequately handle existing and proposed traffic;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, that
the City Engineer, in cooperation with the Cities of Minneapolis and St. Louis
Park, be directed to submit to the Commissioner of Transportation a formal
request for variance for France Avenue between W. 492 Street and W. 44th Street
from the minimum number of required four lanes in order to construct two lanes;
and for France Avenue between W. 39th Street to Excelsior Boulevard from the
required curb -to -curb width of 38 feet to a width of 36 feet.
ADOPTED this 7th day of January, 1985.
V -.A ,.
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Edina City Council will be conducting an informal hearing to discuss the
reconstruction of France Avenue from West 492 Street to the north City
limits. The meeting will be in the Edina City Council Chambers on Monday,
January 7, 1985 at 7:00 P.M.
The Minnesota Department of Transportation ( MNDOT) currently has control of this
portion of France Avenue. MNDOT is proposing that the road be reconstructed
and the roadway be turned over to the adjacent cities or Hennepin County.
The staffs from Minneapolis, St. Louis Park, Edina, Hennepin County and
MNDOT have been meeting to work out a plan that would be acceptable to Hennepin
County as a County Road. This would be consistent with the remainder of
France Avenue in Edina and Bloomington.
This meeting is the first of two meetings on this project. The City Council
will consider the preliminary plans that have been developed in regard to
street width, sidewalks and parking restrictions.
The staff will present the plan and information gathered from neighbors
during an informal meeting on August 16, 1984. The preliminary plan is
basically the same as presented at the neighbor's meeting. The property
owners which will be affected are those abutting France Avenue from West
492 Street to the north city limits.
The basic changes in width are as follows:
LOCATION
EXISTING
PROPOSED
PARKING -WEST SIDE
W. 492 St. to W. 49th St.
41.5'
42'
NO
W. 49th St. to W. 45th St.
43.5'
42'
NO
W. 45th St. to Morningside Rd.
41.0'
48'
YES
(Business area)
Morningside Road to W. 40th St.
33.0'
40'
NO
If you desire additional information on this matter, please contact me at
927 -8861 between 8:00 A.M. - 4:30 P.M. Monday - Friday.
Sincerely,
Francis J.�Hoffman
Director of Public Works
and City Engineer
FJH: jr
CITY OF
PE ED, 6 CIA
4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424
612 - 927 -8861
MEETING NOTICE
Dear Resident /Property Owner
The City of Edina Engineering Department will be holding an informal
meeting to discuss the possible reconstruction of France Avenue from 1•4. 492
Street to the North City Limits. The meeting will be held on Thursday, August
16, 1984 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers.
The Minnesota Department of Transpo
of this portion of France Avenue. MNDOT is
of the roadway and turn over control of the
or Hennepin County. The staffs from MNDOT,
Park and City of Edina have been meeting in
could be acceptable to Hennepin County as a
rtation ( MNDOT) currently has control
proposing to do some reconstruction
roadway to either the adjacent cities
Hennepin County, City of St. Louis
an attempt to work out a plan that
County Road.
The three cities believe the roadway should be a County Road as is the
rest of France Avenue in Edina and Bloomington.
The Edina staff will present the preliminary plans for your review and
input at the informal meeting.
The main issues of discussion will include roadway width, need for on-
street parking and sidewalks.
Again this is an informal meeting to gather the resident and property
owners concerns so that the staff will be able to better present the issues fn
our discussions with the other agencies.
If you have further questions or are unable to attend the meeting, please
call me at 927 -8861
Si ely, )
Francis J. Hoffman, P.
Director of Public Works and City Engineer
K. A. Schmid
4711 Meadow Road
Between 47th and 48th Streets no Edina homes
front on France Avenue. The nine homes on Meadow Rd.
which abuto France on the rear have never had sidewalks
at the front. I see some serious difficulties with the
proposed installation of sidewalk at the rear particular-
ly near the center of the block. Due to the curved
design of Meadow Rd. and the subsequent deep set -back
requirements, the three houses at the center of the
block (09, 11, and 13) have very shallow back yards
with foundations as close as feet to France Ave.
In addition, this is the area of a natural ravine
dropping into the meadow. As a result these houses
are built on a steep incline placing them far below
the grade level of France Ave. The steepest part of
the grade being at 4711.
Any street widening or sidewalk installation at
that point would almost certainly be detrimental to
privacy, security, safety and the amenities of what
have been until now very private and secure back yards.
(At either end of the block the back yards are almost
double in depth due to the same setback line and more
gradual in their slope from France Ave. and therefore
would not be affected in quite the same way by the
proposed change.)
At 4711 we would lose at least two trees at the
property line which in addition to our own trees and
fence- ,give a canopy of protection from the dirt, dust,
sounds and carbon monoxide of 12,000 cars, trucks,
and buses which daily passjust feet .above and east
of our house and newly constructed three - season porch.
Also at 4711, being the first house constructed
on the block, we get our water supply from Minneapolis.,
It is piped under France Avenue with the turn -off valve
located on the bank near or within the proposed side-
walk area.
K AS
-2-
Approximate 18 years ago a.stdrdy guard rail was
placed behind 4711 and parts of 09 and 13 in this natural
ravine area to prevent street vehicles from jumping the
curb and careening into the houses as did a streetcar at
4713 and a car at 4711 doing exterior and interior damege
to the bedroom. We then installed a new privacy fence
at the property line which in a. few feet is already
steeply dropped from the present curb level. A sidewalk
at street level would put many passersby asd-bikers._as
well a!� trucks and buses in a position overlooking living
areas. Until now problems of juveniles throwing trash or
climbing onto the fence have been minimal due to the deep,
brushy slope. This would not remain the case with a side-
walk installed at street level. Also the difficulties
Of constructing a sidewalk.at this point would seem major.
It is hard to see that any proposed change would not leave
-us without negative impact on property value and peace of
mind at 4711.
It is ironic to be .organizing Neighborhood Watch one
week and proposing a plan to increase our exposure to
transient France Ave. the next. The only yard thefts or
incident of breaking and entering with people asleep in
the house occured during a period when one of the back
yards was fenceless.
Sidewalks on the Minneapolis side of France Ave. are
rarely if ever shoveled during the winter for the reason that
the street snow and ice plowed onto them is too heavy and
frozen to shovel. City plowing of these walks or removal
of street snow would make a sidewalk on the Edina side un-
necessary at this point. The existing ditch catches mu ch
of the snow, ice and salt thrown off the street by plowing
resulting in only one or two sections of downed fence each
spring Street and sidewalk plowing would probably be more
than it could withstand.
Clearly we have particular_ problems and concerns at the
center of the 4700 block and I hope that qualified planners and
engineers will take a closer look during the early ,planning
CONCERNS AT 4711
1) Continued guard rail protection from street
vehicles plunging into yard and house.
f rom
2) Continued privacy in living areas /fence and
or wall.
3) Damage during or after construction to
established trees, shrubs, soil and plantings
and soil quality and stability.
4) Damage to water main stub and turnoff valve
which connects us to Mnneapolis water.
5) Structural damage to ceiling and wall plaster,
china and crystal in cabinets due to proximity
to equipment used in breaking up existing street.
6) Freedom from the trash which now accumulates
in the ditch behind our fence and which proliferates
wherever Edina sidewalks have been constructed
near or between commercial centers. (i.e. 50th
Street just west of the shopping center.)
7) Security of homes and persons which has been.
provided in part by the seclusion afforded by
• adequate fencing on France Ave.
8) The expense and difficulty of replacing thepresent
fence behind 4711 if damaged by construction or
snow plowing.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
JANUARY 2, 1985
LD -84 -19 Lots 28 and 29, Warden Acres
Generally located: North of Benton Avenue and West of MNS Railroad
Refer to: Attached survey
The applicant requests a party wall division of an existing double bungalow.
Separate utility connections have been provided.
Recommendation
Approval.
941 -3031
&len Prairie, 1'224' 55344
Survey For William F. Sr.arpe Book Page File
Stephen N. Lisle
1
I
SCALE i " = sej"
A = IRON ll'V,'-L
O = I .;', )N S E
o
I
I
I
1
1
SI
vl
�i
01
v1
31 i
c
c
I �
1
. 1
1
.1
l
)J6.57e -i
C0 k-. Lo -r z•y
>3-
r
I
I
I
i
I
1
i
.t:
r
Z
4
I
i
I�
1
I aoroby arNfr r,.al this it a n,» and correct reprexntC.ioa cf a rvrrey of t!o Ln -=dwiro ef a t t a clip (9 (9 a S C r i ?) t i on
Monsoon Cauaty, t.Unnaata end at t%,y� of c!I W114aps f`.areen, and dl
•Wbla •ncrec6awntb If any, from or on rad lend. Cvrr.7 d �y ca his 1 t h dayel
C'�. ZD""'-LL a A— SECCIATUS, INC.
rTATF r'-r:. IvIn r•ns
CAMARELI.E & ASSOCIATES, INC.
$110 Eden Road
Eden Prairie. Minnesota 55344
. 941 -3031
Description of Parcels on Certificate Dated December 12, 1984:
Description of William F. Sharpe
5412 Benton Avenue
Edina, MN 55436
That part of Lot 28, Warden Acres lying West of the rail-
road right -of -way and that part of the East 125 feet of
Lot 29 Warden Acres lying East of a line dray n from a
point on the North line of said Lot 29 distant 118.17 feet
East of the Northwest corner of said lot to a point on the
South line of said Lot 29 distant 119.38 feet East of the
Southwest corner of said Lot 29. Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Together with a permanent ingress and egress easement for
driveway purposes over the Southerly 66 feet of said Lot
29 and the Easterly 16 feet of the Southerly 66 feet of
Lot 30 Warden Acres' Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Description of Stephen N. Lisle
5416 Benton Avenue
c
Edina, MN 55436
a
That part of the East 125 feet of Lot 29 Warden Acres
lying West of a line drawn from a point on the North
line of said Lot 29 distant 118.17 feet East of the
Northwest corner of said lot to a point on the South
line of said Lot 29 distant 119.38 feet East of the
Southwest corner of said Lot 29. Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Together with a permanent ingress and egress easement for
,-driveway purposes over the Southerly 66 _feet of said Lot
29 and the Easterly 16 feet of the Southerly 66 feet of
Lot 30 Warden Acres. Hennepin County, Minnesota.
U
rr �
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land:
Lots 28 and 29, Warden Acres,
WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate
parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
That part of Lot 28, Warden Acres lying West of the railroad right -of -way
and that part of the East 125 feet of Lot 29 Warden Acres lying East of a
line drawn from a point on the North line of said Lot 29 distant 118.17
feet East of the Northwest corner of said lot to a point on the South
line of said Lot 29 distant 119.38 feet East of the Southwest corner of
said Lot 29, Hennepin County, Minnesota
Together with a permanent ingress and egress easement for driveway
purposes over the Southerly 66 feet of said Lot 29 and the Easterly
16 feet of the Southerly 66 feet of Lot 30 Warden Acres,,Hennepin County,
Minnesota.
and
That part of the East 125 feet of Lot 29 Warden Acres lying West of a line
drawn from a point on the North line of said Lot 29 distant 118.17 feet
East of the Northwest corner of said lot to a point on the South line
of said Lot 29 distant 119.38 feet East of the Southwest corner of said
Lot 29, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Together with a permanent ingress and egress easement for driveway
purposes over the Southerly 66 feet of said Lot 29 and the Easterly
16 feet of the Southerly 66 feet of Lot 30 Warden Acres, Hennepin County,
Minnesota.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances
Nos. 801 and.825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land
is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and
Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof
as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to
any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no
further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the
pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this
Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 7th day of January, 1985.
RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL
FOR INTERLACHEN POINT TOWNHOMES
BE IT. RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "Interlachen Point Townhomes ", platted by Emar Development
Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation, owner and proprietor and Richfield Bank
and Trust Co., a Minnesota Corporation, mortgagee, and presented at the regular
meeting of the City Council of January 7, 1985, be and is hereby granted final
plat approval.
ADOPTED this 7th day of January, 1985.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 7, 1985, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 8th day of January, 1985.
City Clerk
Subdivision No. �` a
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBDIVISION NAME:
LAND SIZE: LAND VALUE_
(By: Date:
The developer of this subdivision has been required to
11 A. grant an easement over part of the land
ElB. dedicate % of the land
Fr�C. donate $ as a fee in lieu of land
As a result of applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of
land dedicated)
1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
2. If property is 6 acre=s or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
II3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged
or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds.
D 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his-
toric value.
F] 6.
B. Cash Required
Q1. In all other instances than above.
11 2.
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
Mayor and City Council
William B. Feck, Fire Chief
Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEi °1 IN EXCESS OF $5,000
January 4, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
Reconstruction of 1973 Ford Pirsch L 9000 Pumper
and all other appurtenances in accordance with
specifications provided
Quotations /Bids:
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Custom Fire Apparatus, Inc. $49,790
2. General Safety Equipment Corporation
0
$47,150
Department Recommendation:
I recommend we award the bid to the lower bidder, General Safety Equipment
Corporation.
Signature Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is ✓ is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
�C� P—x2e�
J. N. Dalen, Finance Director
City Ma aer's Endorsement:
I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council
approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
Kenne h Rosland, ty Manager
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Parks and Recreation
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITE<<1 IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: Jan. 3, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
22,000 Park and.Recreation Activities Calendars
Quotations /Bids:
Company
1. Carlson Printing
Sexton Printing
2.
3, Foss Printing
Amount of Quote or Bid
$7,125.00
7,169.00
7,910.00
Department Recommendation:
Activities Calendar to be awarded to Carlson Printing for $7,125.00
n re Departm
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is ./ is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
Dalen, Finance Director
City Ma aer's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative: /l
eth Roslan
nager
i "A
T0: Ken Rosland, City Manager
From: J.N. Dalen, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Braemar Golf Course Projections
DATE: January 4, 1985
The Finance Department has reviewed the projections
of the - expansion of The Braemar Golf Course. Various
changes were recommended in the projected revenue and
expense amounts along with a more thorough breakdown
of the assunptions used to arrive at these amounts.
We feel that the revenue and expense projections,
together with the underlying assumptions are now
reasonable.
BRAEMAR (iv,.F COURSE
REVENUE PROJECTIONS
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
184400
236700
245600
287700
304500
333500
309500
310500
280100
11000
34500
Golf Course Green Fees
391000
393000
435000
435000
• 476000
476000
518000
518000
560000
560000
Golf Cars
75000
75000
75000
79000
79000
83000
83000
86000
86000
89000
Patron Cards
66000
69000
70000
70000
71000
78500
79500
80500
81500
85500
Rentals (lockers, lessons,
14000
14000
14000
14000
14000
14000
14000
14000
14000
14000
clubs, pull carts)
47500
49500
20100
135400
188300
212000
189100
210050
249550
319550
Total Golf Course Revenue
546000
551000
59.4000
598000
640000
651500
684500
698500
741500
748500
Range Revenue
123000
134000
136000
143000
145000
152000
154000
161000
163000
170000
Grill Revenue
105000
107000
110000
115000
125000
140000
150000
155000
160000
170000
Executive Course
69000
48000
114700
149600
188700
221000
250000
267000
276000
285600
Total Revenue
843000
840000
953700
1005600
1098700
1164500
1249500
1280500
1340500
1372100
EXPENSE PROJECTIONS
Total Operating Expense
Net Operating Income
S
Interest on Bonds
Depreciation
Capital Investments
Bond Retirement
Gain or Loss
Accumulative Gain or Loss
599600
655600
717000
760000
811000
860000
916000
971000
1030000
1092000
243400
184400
236700
245600
287700
304500
333500
309500
310500
280100
11000
34500
113000
105000
100000
95000
90000
85000
80000
75000
47000
47000
50000
50000
50000
50000
50000
50000
50000
50000
63500
66750
70000
73500
77000
81000
85000
50000
50000
50000
50000
50000
50000
50000
50000
50000
50000
135400
52900
23700
(22900)
20950
39500
70000
47500
49500
20100
135400
188300
212000
189100
210050
249550
319550
367050
416550
436650
EXTRAORDINARY EXPENSE
Total operating expense based on 6% normal increase plus the
following anticipated additions:
1986:
One
extra maintenance person
$20,000 ±
(executive course)
1987:
One
part time cashier (executive course)
$4,000 t
1987:
One
extra person (grill)
$18,000 t
1989:
One
Part time cashier (executive course)
$5,000 t
1991:
One
part time cashier (executive course)
$5,000 t
NOTE : Subject to change depending on the actual amount of the bonds, when
the bonds are issued, the payment schedule set up and other factors.
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
+
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS STUDY
PROJECTED BOND PAY14ENTS
PRINCIPAL
INTEREST
OUTSTANDING
ANNUAL TOTAL
YEAR
PAYMENTS
PAYMENTS
PRINCIPAL
PAYMENT
1986
27500
1100000
27500
1987
110000
1100000
110000
1988
50000
105000
1050000
155000
1989
50000
100000
1000000
150000
1990
50000
95000
950000
145000
1991
50000
90000
900000
140000
1992
50000
85000
850000
135000
1993
50000
80000
800000
130000
1994
50000
75000
750000
125000
1995
50000
70000
700000
120000
1996
100000
60000
600000
160000
1997
100000
50000
500000
150000
1998
100000
40000
400000
140000
1999
100900
30000
300000
130000
2000
100000
20000
200000
120000
2001
100000
10000
100000
110000
2002
100000
100000
NOTE : Subject to change depending on the actual amount of the bonds, when
the bonds are issued, the payment schedule set up and other factors.
BRAEMAR GOLF
COURSE
PROPOSED.RATES
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992,
1993
1994
Patron Card
40.00:
45.00
50.00
18 Hole Golf Car
16.00
17.00
18.00
19.00
20.00
9 Hole Golf Car
8.50
9.00
9.50
10.00
10.50
18 Hole - Senior Rate
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
16.00
9 Hole - Senior Rate
640
6.50
7.00
7.50
.8.00
Large Range Balls
3.00
3.25
3.50
3.75
4.00
4.25
Small Range Balls
2.00
2.25
2.50
2.75
3.00
3.25
GREEN FEES
18 Hole Patron
8.00
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
.9 Hole Patron
5.00
5.50
6.00
6.50
7.00
18 Hole Non - Patron
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
9 Hole Non - Patron
6.50
7.00
7.50
8.00
8.50
18 Hole Senior Patron
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00
11.00
9 Hole Senior Patron
4.50
5..00
5.50
6.00
f.
6.50
18 Hole Senior Non - Patron
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00-
14.00
9 Hole Senior Non - Patron
6.00
6.50
7.00
7.50
8.00
-Rounds Projected
53000 ,:,.,:53000
53000
53000
53000
53000
53000'._
53000
53000
53000
Average Fee Per Round
7.38
7.38
8.20
8.20
8.98
8.98
9.77
91.77
10.56
10.56
PROPOSED RATES (CONT.) 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994
EXECUTIVE COURSE FEES
Adult Patron
2.75
4.00
4.50
5.00
5.50
6.00
6.50
6.75
7.00
Adult Non - Patron
3.75
5.04
5.50
6.00
6.50
7.00
7.50
7.75
8.00
Junior Patron
1.75
2.75
3.25
3.75
4.25
4.75
5.25
5.50
5.75
Junior Non - Patron
2.50
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
5.50
6.00
6.25
6.50
Rounds Projected
22000
15000 27000
32000
37000
40000
42000
42000
42000
42000
Average Fee Per Round
3.14
3.14 4.25
4.67
5.10
5.52
-°'5.96
6.36
6.57
6.80
a
• t
LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT
ISSUE POLICY
FEDERAL
1. Federal
Cable
Legis.
SF 66
HF 4103
2. Federal
Deficit
CITY OF EDINA
1984 =85 POLICY ISSUES
TS STATUS
Allow retention of
local government
control in issue
Reduce deficit to re-
reduce interest 'rates
by reduction in federal
spending
DRAFTED 1/2/85
MUNICIPAL
LEGISLATIVE
UE POLICY AWM POLICY COMMISSION
Passed Senate. House SGL-9 Retain local
passed in 1984 session government in fran-
Somewhat deregulating zhising process and
the industry. ontinue funding state
able board.
1983 Congress substan-
tially increased. 198
Congress passed $50
billion "down - payment"
Significant deficits
projected through 1988
if no action taken.
II -C Do not
diminish
local contr
LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT
ISSUE POLICY /COM
STATE
1. Improve- Very key issue
ment in
Minnesota's
overall
economy,
i.e.,
business
CITY OF EDINA
1984 -85 POLICY ISSUES
STATUS
Attempts made in 1984
legislature /not fully
successful
climate
2. Local Go t.
Aids
a) Dist. Eliminate present state Did not further —A ce
I
u
aid formula- -all muni- amount grandfathered
cipalities; rely on pro- for.1985.with restor-
perty tax. Alternative ation of the 1984
X61- Distribute aids reduction
strictly on per capita.
A1t.#2- Insure formula
does not subsidize in-
efficiency,in local
govt. or duplication of
service provision by 2
or more levels of govt.
DRAFTED 1/2/85
DAT
MUNICIPAL
LEGISLATIVE
COP @IISS ION
-C Recom- Recoup 1984 losses.
mends State Reinstitute "Grandfather"
renew its clause for 1985. Alter
commitment t in 1985 Legislature
= . adequately f nd for 1986.
- - -
state aid an
distribute or a
"fair & equitable"
basis. Use
special mean
for special'
problems.
CITY OF EDINA
1984 -85 POLICY ISSUES DRAFTED 1/2/85
LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT
MUNICIPAL
ISSUE POLICY /CO1*1GNTS STATUS 1_FAMP unt rry LIiG1SLA'1'1VE
STATE (CONT)
, -
twirl POLICY
UU UfISSION
Wunding
Local govt. solely on
Study commission
-:C (see
property tax. Alterna-
appointed.
pre
II
tive - -tie to percentage
i vious page
of sales tax if state
imposed mandates on
local government are
also estimated. Reduce
overall state sales and
income tax rates.
3. Mill Levy
Eliminate mill levy
For 1984, reverted to
RSS(A)
Repeal present levy
I-A Repeal
Limits
limits entirely.
old formula. No change
limits.
levy limits.
for 1985.
I -B Recommen
s
as an altern
-
tive several
changes to
levy limits.
CITY OF EDINA
1984 -85 POLICY ISSUES
LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT
ISSUE POLICY /COMMENTS STATUS
STATE (CONT).
4.A. Compulsa
Arbitrat
B. Part time
worker
definition
C. PELRA Def.,
3. Fiscal Dis-
parities
Let individual cities
n have the right to de-
termine essential /non
essential employees tie
right to strike.,
Alternative - -for esse -
tial employees, last
best offer arbitratio
as a more realistic
method for arbitration
to determine "fairness."
Restore old definition
of 100 days prior to
eligibility for organiz
No changes
Delete requirement to Recodification impacted
negotiate with union supervisory test for
regardingideletion of bargaining unit ex-
supervisory position. clusion.
from bargaining unit.
Eliminate Alternative: Eliminate. Alternative
Return tojorig. intent. return to orig.intent.
LEAGUE
DRAFTED 1/2/85
MUNICIPAL
LEGISLATIVE
AM POLICY COMISS ION
PPS -6(A) 1.Eliminate IIA. Similar
definition of "essen- to Leagues.
tial employees." Allo
employer select arbi-
tration (right to str ke).
2..Raise part time de-
finition to 100 days.
3.No honoring of pick. t
lines by non - striking,
employees. 4..Employee
select only one proceture
for appealing discipline.
5.Abolish PERB. and'-place
duties to BMS._
i
LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT
ISSUE POLICY /COMMENTS
CITY OF EDINA
1984 -85 POLICY ISSUES
DRAFTED 1/2/85
MUNICIPAL
STATUS TPA 11V onrrin. -•
LEGISLATIVE
STATE (CONT)
—
e Wi rVLLU1
UUPRHISSION
. Worker's Com
Revamp system to reduce
Minor changes in 1984
pensation &
overall cost. Delete pr E-
Legislature.
Unemployment
sumption of job related
disability under "heart
and lung" law for publi
safety personnel
PPS -12 Revamp pre-
sumption of liability
for public safety
personnel as it relat
s
to heart /lung disease
2..
PPS -16(C) -Limit unem-
ployment aysilable
to people who know-
ingly take temporary
jobs of less than a
one -year duration.
7. Day Labor
Current proposal before
the Legislature could
Deleted position.
II -F The cur
cent
increase the City's
-
provisions oE
the
.administrative costs of
Uniform Muni
ipal
doing maintenance and
Contract law
and
repair projects for no
local improv
ment
benefit plus severely
code are suf
icient
hamper efficiency of City
crews all in the nam4
of efficiency.
LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT
ISSUE POLICY,
STATE (CONT)
8.Fire /Buildii
CITY OF EDINA
1984= 85 'POLICY ISSUES
STATUS LEAGUE POLICY
Upgrading of fire and Currently allow municil
building codes at state adoption of Appendix E
level to incorporate for more stringent
improved fire protectiom sprinkler requirements
features.
DRAFTED 1/2/85
MUNICIPAL
LEGISLATIVE
'OLICY COMISSION
L PPS -9 Clarify Stat 's responsib lities for fire code
Lnspections for speci is occupanci S.
?PS -10(B) Adopt state
II -H Retain
:ode with these modi-
-ications: mandatory
-Local enforcement state code i
option (except Metro Metro area
area)
-State inspectors use
outside communities
without local enforc -
ment
- Architects /engineers
certify structural
compliance with cod
-Allow more restricts e
codes.
Uniform enforcement f
handicap provisions.
Allow local enactmen
of more stringent-co es
for-sprinkler requir ments.
CITY OF EDINA
1984 -85 POLICY'ISSUES DRAFTED 1/2/85
EL OF GOVERMENT
MUNICIPAL
ISSUE POLICY /C0101ENTS STATUS LEGISLATIVE
LEAGUE POLICY
STATE (CONT)
AMM POLICY
COP @IISSION
9.Uniform Elec
Several problems exist
No change
GSGL -13(B) Opposes un form
tion Day
from a local standpoint
election day but incl des
including current capac
ty
considerations to be
of voting machines if
enacted
O.Homestead
enacted.
Credit
a)Broaden law regarding
No change
dual ownership and
availability of full
homestead, not allow paying
occupant to deduct real
estate taxes.
b)Not allow state decrease
of homestead they promi
e.
1.Law Enforce-
Eliminate POST an an
POST has substantially
PPS -7(B) Limit further
ment Standar
s unneeded regulation
reduced scope of rules
expansion of POST , II -L -Allow
on local government.
it established.
standards in areas of alternative
Alternative- Modify to
recruitment, train- avenues of
broaden avenues of en-
ing and conduct. admission to
the police field
trance into profession.
Place a moratorium on
further POST rule makin
.
LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT
ISSUE
,'.Fire Pers
Standards
CITY OF EDINA
1984 =85 POLICY'ISSUES
POLICY /C0101ENTS STATUS
Allow local service
provider to set standar
3.Elimination Retain distinction of
of 3.2 Beer 3.2 and strong beer
for both op and off
sales.
` +.Special Taxi g Grant powers to estab-
Districts lish special valorem
(added 3/83) districts to Edina.
State Fire Chiefs
s. Association
studying a "voluntary"
certification program.
No change
LEAGUE POLICY
3. Limit state in-
fluence in local per-
sonnel procedures.
4.Permit variance pro-
cedures for rural are s.
5.Retain present boar
composition.
6.Provide alternative
paths to licensing.
PPS- 8(B)-1.Let locals
establish standards.
2.Upgrades in personnel
from non -local levels
should be done by in-
creasing expenditures
to assist local govt.
PPS -17 -Same as City II
Edina although added t
Blmton. bill was remov d,
1983. No action, 1984.
DRAFTED 1/2/85
MUNICIPAL
LEGISLATIVE
POLICY COMISSION
-0 Retain
current dis-
tinction to
limit sale o
strong beer in retail.
CITY OF EDINA
1984 -85 POLICY ISSUES DRAFTED 1/2/85
LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT
MUNICIPAL
ISSUE POLICY /COMAfENTS CTATIIC
LEGISLA'11VE
STATE (CONT)
--
- --
r Wl rVLLLl
UUPUfISSION
.Highway Tax
Retain current formula
No change
Spending
dedicated to capital
expenditures
Deleted Policy
V -A Maintain
strong highw
y
PPS -2(A) Repeal any
trust fund.
.Career Fire-
Must live in community
Further:reduced a
restrictions on
IV- Restore M
tro
fighter Resid
ncy they serve
Metropolitan commun-
local government.
rea ability lo
ity's ability to limit
et time /dist
nce
Lobbyists at
Limit to one lobbyist
residency
equirements lor
Legislature on
per pension fund.
PPS -13(B) Supports
11 employees
Pension Matter
City's position.
Defin.of Polic
Limit to on- duty••stat
s.
Officer On Dut
Treat as citizen arre
t
Status Outside
outside of community
of Jurisdictio
carrying weapon outsi
[volition.
e
jurisdiction on own
Streamlining
Make legislature proces
Initiated a study'on
Legislature
more efficient
reducing the size of tie
legislature
21 -year old
drinking age
Due to the use and abus
of alochol as it
Federal moved to reduce
eleted on
relate
to teenagers in general
I
highway
hway funds to state
without 2.1 1 age. .
age
& in part. the improper
operation of motor veh'cles
while under the i
fluence. Cit�
supports raising of drinkil
nVr u„
g
LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT
ISSUE
STATE (CONT)
POLICY
CITY OF EDINA
1984 -85 POLICY ISSUES
STA
.Plan Develop. Revise State Statutes t No change
District permit the Council to
Variances approve variances wh' i
h
.Community
Health
Funding
Municipal
pensions
- Highway
Jurisdiction
COUNTY
-verall Bud
s
are a part of a planned
unit development withou
requiringiithe Board of.
Appeal's approval on such
variances!
Oppose changes in No change
present legislation.
I
Phase out defined benefit _..
plans and !replace with
defined contribution plans.
(That any change in
jurisdiction provide
adequate funding for
capital renewal and
maintenance.
Reduce costs and servic s
DRAFTED 1/2/85
MUNICIPAL
LEGISLATIVE
E POLICY
AM POLICY COMISS ION
eted Position
'S -1(A) Various mean
1 make PERA a better
:al for cities.
LEVEL OF COVEMIENT
POLICY
CITY OF EDINA
1984- 85'POLICY ISSUES
A
COUNTY (CONT)
Emergency Have all costs of Sheriff's 911 line changes
Communications/ radio /other services to are in dis ute
Sheriff's ser- users on a use fee basi
vices in genera All treated equally. including County com
Solid Waste Preserve current system
Disposal of free contractor coll ction.
Detention Review charge system.
Facilities
Tax Increment Limit power of approval
Financing by county to present
Districts comment.
Shade Tree Leave funding to local
Funding communities.
- lmbulance No subsidization of
-,ervice service by county.Retai
current service tiers.
ter aided dispatch.
DRAFTED 1/2/85
APIM
MUNICIPAL
LEGISLATIVE
COMMISSION
II -Q State 1 vel -
Restore stat
50% grant pr Aram
D
N
10
E
v
•
•
•
CITY OF EDINA
1984= 85'POLICY'ISSUES DRAFTED 1/2/85
LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT
MUNICIPAL
ISSUE POLICY/COMMENTS STATUS t c er_o vnt LECISLAI'IVE
METRO
eu'M YULIGT
COMMISSION
etro Council
Ensure that the Metro
Citizen's League
IV -B Limit r
le
Council remains in a
study recently released
of Metro Cou
cil
limited role both in
a study on the Metro
to planning iole.
planning & operations.
Council addressing
Avoid any expanded,local
several of these issue
IV -C Allow local
influence or going into
(6/84)
elected offi (ials
operational mode. Preve
t
to serve sim
1-
institution of elected
taneously on
body. Alternative- -use
Metro Counci
local municipal officials
in their loc
1
as Council Members.
community.
etropolitan
Allow interested cities
using Fund
to do under a joint
powers agreement - not
mandated or established
by Met Council.
conomic De-
Let locals handle in
IIIA -Leave housing
elopment
their own manner.
alternatives
primarily
riminal Justice
With LEAA funding no
Committee attempting
up to local units.
3ordinating
longer available,.en-
to drum up issues to
:)uncil
courage dissolution of
give it a purpose.
function.
I .
LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT
ISSUE
METRO (CONT)
.Cable Inter-
connection
.Metro Transit
Metro Mobility)
,.Local Review o
Federal Fundin
Metro Waste
CITY OF EDINA
1984 -85 POLICY ISSUES
ICY
Retain local control A joint powers group
over the process. being formed by presen
Limit Metro role. cable commissions
- Review funding mechani ms Legislature split t'
- Continue Metro Transit planning and operatin,
to subsidize and speci Y functions into two
levels boards
- Encourage use of priva e
sector to provide more
cost effective service
Extend availability, to Implemented June 15,
all of Edina as it is t1ke 1984
only first -ring suburb
not fully served
Continue use of local
elected officials to
review federally funded
projects (A -95)
Promote greater accoun- Being evaluated
tability to local entit es
particularly in the are s
of capital projects and
consultants
DRAFTED 1/2/85
LEAGUE POLICY
IC -Form a co
f commission
stablish int
e
Private sector to pro ide
more cost - effective
service
MUNICIPAL
LECISLA'11VE
COMISS ION
ission
to
connect.
tructuring of MTC structur
V -F With pha e -out
federal A -95 imit
metro review o
etro concern
-- IV -0 Legislat Lve
eview of Several changes proposed
etro wastes to improve operations
harge in-
reases
i
II
i
CITY OF EDINA
1984- 85'POLICY ISSUES
LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT
ISSUE POLICY /COMMENTS STATUS LEAGUE
SCHOOL BOARD
.Wooddale School Disposition Transferred to City
-Land Use De- Work together for joint September 5, 1984.
cisions on satisfactory decisions.
Closed Schools
Property Tax Promote close cooperatio
Reduction to reduce taxes by joint
effort of,City /District
through improved
efficiency
I
DRAFTED 1/2/85
MUNICIPAL
LEGISLATIVE
MrA POLICY COM ISSION
TENTATIVE AGENDA OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
Tuesday, January 8 - Informational Meeting - Wooddale School /W. 50th Street
Tuesday, January 15 - Informational Meeting - Wooddale School /W. 50th Street
* Monday, January 21 - Opus Corporation /Normandale Golf Course
Report on W. 70th Street
Draft Ordinance - Wine Licenses
Monday, January 28 - Traffic Safety Committee and Speed Awareness
* Monday, February 4 - Wooddale School /W. 50th Street
Monday, February 11 - Edinborough
* Monday, February 25 - York Avenue Improvement
Brucker Development (Green Farm)
Johnson Building Company - Biltmore
* Monday, March 4 - Tree Trimming Improvement - Northwest Quadrant
Valley View Road Improvement (Mark Terrace to County #18)
Permanent Street Surfacing
Sidewalk
Monday, March 11 - Advisory Health Committee /Council /(Human Relations Commission)
* Monday, March 18 - Sidewalk Improvements
Monday, March 25 - City Hall Space Study
* Regular Council Meetings
OTHER MEETINGS
Thursday, January 24 - Municipal Legislative Commission
Tuesday, January 29 - LMC 1985 Legislative Conference
Wednesday, January 30
Friday, March 1 - Council /Local Legislators Breakfast
December 20, 1984
edina dllid"W. 'al load it
Dear Friend of Wooddale School:
4801 West 50th St.
Edina, Minn., 55424
As you know, the Edina Historical Society has been deeply
concerned about the future of Wooddale School. The Society
has encouraged and supported the preservation of this historic
landmark. The Society has backed this commitment by locating the
Society's museum and its extensive collection at Wooddale. We
have felt that it is equally important to preserve our architectural
heritage as well as collectible artifacts that represent Edina's
past.
But the Society has -not proposed that Wooddale School be
preserved as an empty building or solely as a museum. Rather it
has been our goal to see that Wooddale School continues to serve
all the citizens of Edina to meet demands that are not now being
met. At the same time we have advocated that the building be
self- supporting by generating sufficient income to offset
operating costs so that it is not a drain on the taxpayers.
A decision on the future of Wooddale School is fast approaching._
Ownership of the building has been transferred from the School
District to the City of Edina. A consultant has been studying
alternatives for the future development of the area and Wooddale
itself. His report will be presented at a Public Informational
Meeting at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 8th and 15th in the
Wooddale School Auditorium.
The public will be asked for their comment and criticism. This
is your opportunity to let the City Council know how you feel
about the future of Wooddale. If you f eel , as we do, that Wooddale
School should continue to serve all of the citizens of Edina, we
would encourage you to attend and make yourself heard. This may
be your last chance to express your concern!!
DON'T TEAR IT DOWN!!!
Sincerely yours,
EDINA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
AM
Donna Sk:agerberg
President
- Lis L biu -i+i,
page 5
ADDRESS /FORMER OWNER
FDINA
No Address
State Land Department
No Address
State Land Department
-A
TOTAL
PID # BLDG VALUE MARKET VALUE
32- 117 -21 41 0083 1Laty, 81k-J, pp 27,500
Wallin. . ACKf &fkl . 4CP�aT
19- 028 -24 32 0009
M
No Address 20- 028 -24 34 0002 300
State Land Department
HWY
N0RMAND
� J
O
6=
QN e"
r
�s
f•
LNnntnitt.rtnif�tuL"
E tu�u,u,,,.,..,.�
° e�
',yid
-5 /5
11111�1�tl�HtiniittiKi -3�� ?/$
atttnnui��
40
-
1,.7eE15 +32 �! RD ; ,,. -:,_-
� ;�ttitiiuulti
lea
I
• 30I I3C o Q N R/
p ^•~ I
I
11113
Ci, Lh
too o • J �.
n` o N46 IV.
N4.
�3 5 0`
40
��� 6 150. r
5 1
S e
�. 80
,o
ol
—i
(n +.. o♦
.rIQG(. �
�
° ". ra N 'c 1
Yi,
r�1 IJS (�
.Nl mooy'
ch
Q
. 94.6
" rri'
7130
�Aoa
ZS�25
u A
y`bt o `l nl
3 ys
..7
Ily
1 0
v
j 11i .k
-fill
I �
oil
AVE
01130)
V';i of Edina
0
N
�.a
Ln n
-° o
r� I .
2-3
rn s, - �2
O
Z
m
M
20
119
9
18
17
16
w-1 4:
—� 15
7 4G A"
3%
4
5
14�
6
9
2Z.150 < m
CD
34
RSJ
1165
D.
T4
130
Q.
51 3c
114 12
12 0
114.93
n
mg
i0
30
nX54-11 134.IZM
C3
r I
IUD
IS4
3
134 1
9% .
5
7'9✓
2-3
rn s, - �2
O
Z
m
M
20
119
9
18
17
16
w-1 4:
—� 15
7 4G A"
3%
4
5
14�
6
9
2Z.150 < m
CD
34
RRgOT.TTTTON
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has received from the
County of Hennepin a list of lands in said municipality which became
the property of the State of Minnesota for non - payment of real estate
taxes, which said list has been designated as Classification List
No. 670 -NC; and
WHEREAS, each parcel of land described in said list has heretofore been
classified by the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County,
Minnesota as non - conservation land and the sale thereof has heretofore
been authorized by said Board of County Commissioners;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by said City Council, acting pursuant
to Minnesota Statute 282, and the said classification by said Board of
County Commissioners of each parcel of land described in said list as
non - conservation land be and the same is hereby approved, and that the
sale of each such parcel of land be and the same is hereby approved.
ADOPTED this 7th day of January, 1985.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina
City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 7, 1985, and as recorded in
the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 9th..day of January,.-1985.
City Clerk
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DEPOSITORIES
BE IT RESOLVED that the First Edina National Bank, Edina, MN, First Southdale
National Bank, Edina, MN, Americana State Bank of Edina, Edina, MN, Southwest
Fidelity State Bank, Edina, MN, First National Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis,
MN and Norwest Bank MetroWest, Edina, MN, authorized to do banking business in
Minnesota, be and hereby are designated as Official Depositories for the
Public Funds of the City of Edina, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, until
January 1, 1986.
ADOPTED this 7th day of January, 1985.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 7, 1985, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 10th day of January , 1985.
City Clerk
SIGNATORY RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the persons holding office as Mayor, Manager and Treasurer
of the City of Edina be, and they hereby are, authorized to act for this munici-
pality in the transaction of any banking business with First Edina National Bank,
First Southdale National Bank, Americana State Bank of Edina, Southwest Fidelity
State Bank, First National Bank of Minneapolis and Norwest Bank MetroWest
(hereinafter referred to as the "Bank ") from time to time and until written
notice to any Bank to the contrary, to sign checks against said accounts, which
checks will be signed by the Mayor, Manager and City Treasurer. Each Bank is
hereby authorized and directed to honor and pay any checks against such account
which is signed as above described, whether or not said check is payable to the
order of, or deposited to the credit of, any officer or officers of the City,
inclpding the signer or signers of the check.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 7, 1985, and! as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this :10th day of January, 1985.
City Clerk
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING USE OF
FACSIMILE SIGNATURES BY PUBLIC OFFICIALS
RESOLVED that the use of facsimile signatures by the following named persons:
C. WAYNE COURTNEY - MAYOR
KENNETH E. ROSLAND - CITY MANAGER
J. P:. DALEN - CITY TREASURER
on checks, drafts, warrants, warrant - checks, vouchers or other orders of public
funds deposited in First Edina National Bank, First Southdale National Bank,
Americana State Bank of Edina, Southwest Fid.elity State Bank, First National Lank
of Minneapolis and Nonvest Bank MetroWest, be and hereby is approved, and that each
of said named persons may authorize said depository banks to honor any such instru-
ment bearing his facsimile signature in such form as he may designate and to charge
the same to the account in said depository bank upon which drawn, as fully as though
it bore his manually written signature and that instruments so honored shall be
wholly perative and binding in favor of said depository bank although such facsimile
signature shall have been affixed without his authority.
ADOPTED this 7th day of January, 1985.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, Marcella M. Daehn, duly appointed City Clerk for the City of Edina, Hennepin
County, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of "Resolution
Authorizing Use of Facsimile Signatures by Public Officials" with the original
thereof as recorded in the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina City Council
held Monday, January 7, 1985, and that the same is a true and correct copy of said
original record, and that said Resolution was adopted by said City Council at said
Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 10th day of January, 1985.
City Clerk
RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF
SECURITIES IN LIEU OF BOND
(FIRST EDINA NATIONAL BANK)
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, approves the
assignment by its depository, First Edina National Bank, of the following securities,
as good and sufficient collateral for the City of Edina Public Funds deposited in
said depository:
RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF
SECURITIES IN LIEU OF BOND
FIRST SOUTHDALE NATIONAL BANK OF EDI
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, approves the
assignment by its depository, First Southdale National Bank of Edina, of the following
securities, as good and sufficient collateral for the City of Edina Public Funds
deposited in said depository:
( �',r r6 be Q tided
-E -(
56 -0161 BANK 056 -114 CUST 101230 FIRST EDINA NATIONAL BANK INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DATE 12/31/84 PAGE 2
IV110 12/28/84 MONTH -END MINNEAPOLIS MN PLEDGE REPORT 12/31/84 TYPE 4
SK
GP
SECURITY
RECEIPT
SK RCPT.
PAR VALU
ESCRIPTION
COUP
MAT DTE
MDY
S &P
MKT. VALUE
BOOK VALUE
OJ
3
011770YT5
015860
100,0 00 .00
ALASKA ST
5.600
7 01/87
AA
94,732
99,926.33
02
3
011770YY4
080430
125,007.00
ALASKA ST
5.000
7/01/92
AA
92,812
125,000.00
04
3
015138AL4
033380
100,000.00
ALEXANDRIA MINN LAKE AREA SAN
5.500
1/01/87
A
93,964
99,910.30
DIST
04
3
035879U94
018490
100,00D.00
NNNE ARUNDEL CNTY MD
6.250
12/01/89
AA
90,729
104,397.87
02
3
059185HPG
059440
100,000.00
3ALTIMORE MD
5.400
10/15/92
Ai
75,529
99,248.71
02
3
167537NX3
059760
125,000.00
HICAGO ILL MET SAN DIST
5.900
1 01 93
NR
94,949
124,308.82
GTR CHICAGO
02
3
213i83KS4
078120
150,000.00
-OOK CNTY ILL
5.750
11/01/93
AA
115,686
149,610.17
O.^
3
216579VX7
023510
100,000.00
DON RAPIDS MINN VAR PURP
5.700
2/01 93
A
75,214
99.846.43
02
3
233433NU1
059640
150,000.00
)ADE CNTY FLA
6.000
6/01/93
Ai
117,394
149,491.51
04
3
419776077
015730
100,000.00
AAWAII ST
5.600
6/01/87
A
94,838
_ 99,928.66
02
3
566897GXG
059180
I
150,000.00
AARCOPIA CNTY ARIZ SCH DIST
5.400
)7/01/92
Al
113,960
150,000.00
NO 4 MESA UNI
02
3
566897HD9
059570
100,000.00
4ARICOPA CNTY ARIZ SCH DIST
5.500
7/01/93
Al
74,357
99,758.52
NO 4 MESA UNI
02
3
574204CX9
058910
15O,000.O0
ARYLAND ST DEPT TRANS CONS
5.375
2/15/93
AAA
114,100
150,000.00
TRANSN
04
3
E03745AH3
079500
_
100,000.07
AINNEAPOLIS MINN HOSP REV
5.600
12 01 87
1
93,360
100.000.00
ABBOTT NORTHWESTN HOSP INC
02
3
603745BTG
078200
205,000.00
FAIRVIEW COMM HOSP REV
6.400
9/01/93
Ai
166,1_31
205,000.00
012
3
G07114LZG
080200
100.007.00
OOBILE ALABAMA VAR PURP
5.250
8/01 92
A
73.589
100.005.00
04
3
686069UL7
020140
170,000.00
IREGON ST
4.500
10/15/87
Ai
151,504
144.293.12
02
3
686070JR5
079600
150,000.00
REGON ST
5.000
7/01/92
Al
109,642
15_0,000.00
02
3
729773NE7
060100
175,000.00
DLYMOUTH MINN
6.000
5376-T79_4
Al
133,796
174,561.46
02
3
777594KC5
059690
100,000.00
ROSEMOUNT MINN INDPT SCH DIST
5.600
2/01/93
A
74,486
99,768.85
NO 196
01
ITEMS
20 PLEDGEE
TOTAL
2,550,000.
O
2.050,779.14
_2.52.5 , 05_5.75
2,550.000.
DO PLEDGED MUNIS OVER 2 YRS
050,779.14
2,525,055.75
rf/4M WA' I
_]�7,'E -,�
56 -0228 BANK 056 -115 CUST 101240 FIRST SOUTHDALE NATIONAL BANK INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DATE 12/31/84 PAGE 4
IV110 12/28/84 MONTH -END MPLS MN PLEDGE REPORT 12/31/84 TYPE 4
- --
SK
GP
SECURITY
RECEIPT
SK RCPT.
PAR VALU
DESCRIPTION &COUP
AT DTE
MDY
S &P
MKT. VALUE
BOOK VALUE
02
1
*912827KE1
077320
2 0,000.00
J S TREASURY 'NOTES S
10.375
5/15/85
200,460
199,'985.15
10 3/8 NOTE C 85
04
3
035879404
060120
200,000.00
ANNE ARUNDEL CNTY MD
5.700
2/01/94
A
150,979
199,663.69
04
3
059129840
001555
100,000.00
3ALTIMORE CNTY MD
5.900
9 O1 86
AA
98,049
100,577.81
04
3
059185JB5
060360
200,000.00
3ALTIMORE MD
5.900
10/15/93
1
154,093
199.674.84
04
3
075005MX3
009640
50,000.00
3EAVER CNTY PA NEW PUB HSG
5.250
6/01/95
AAA
34,828
50,729.46
AUTH VANPORT
04
3
122457VGG
060320
150,000.00
3URNSVILLE MINN
5.700
2/01/94
A
109,493
149,747.77
041
3
*22377OCK2
096710
35,000.00
OWLITZ CNTY WASH
5.100
7/01/90
Al
28,037
35.026.58
04
3
2441810EI
060270
50,000.00
)EER RIVER MINN INDPT SCH DIST
5.750
)2/01/94
AA1
35,961
49.867.24
NO 317
04
3
296803MY2
060400
150,00).00
ESSEX CNTY NJ
6.600
6/01/94
A
123,459
158,791.22
04
3
41977BAD7
074230
150,000.00
AAWAII ST
5.900
32/01/94
A A
115,579
149,625.07
04
3
688443RP7
077060
150,000.00
SSEO MINN INDPT SCH DIST
5.750
1/01/94
A
110,223
149,729.25
NO 279
04
3
*729773PL9
077550
50,000.00
DLYMOUTH MINN
6.700
03/01/86
Al
49,549
50,008.82
03
3
986018801
010580
100,000.00
YOLO CNTY CALIF FLOOD CTL &
4.750
2/01/87
A
91,405
99,925.53
WTR CONSV DIST ZONE NO 4
292299AJ3
000010
5,000.00
EMPORIA CITY KANS INDL REV
6.000
3 01 88
AA2
4,515
4,993.75
IOWA BEEF PACKERS
E046
ITEMS
14 PLEDGEE
TOTAL-
1,590,000.
O
1,306,636.99
1,598,346.18
150,000.30
PLEDGED MUNIS UNDER 2 YRS
147,599.06
150,586.63
1,240.000.
DO PLEDGED MUNIS OVER 2 YRS
958,577.93
1,247,774.40
200,000.00
PLEDGED GOVERNMENTS
200,460.00
199,985.15
F
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, that parcel of land described as the Southwest Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and the Southeast Quarter
of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 30, Township 117,
Range 21, according to the Government Survey thereof, is owned by the
City of Edina; and
WHEREAS, said property was transferred to the City to be used for park
purposes; and
WHEREAS, the City is involved in development of said property for park
purposes and is concerned with orderly and compatible development of
the park and of the Grandview Park Cemetery Association property which
adjoins the Northerly and Northeasterly boundary of the park; and
WHEREAS, the Northwesterly and Northeasterly corners of said property
are not necessary for the orderly development of the park but would be of
value to the cemetery property to allow an adjustment to the original cemetery road
pattern; and
WHEREAS, the Northwesterly and Northeasterly corners of said property are
unbuildable pursuant to City ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the Cemetery Association has agreed to allow the City to enter on
its property and grade the common boundary to elevations agreed to by the City
and the Cemetery Association.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the County of Hennepin place the following described parcels of land on
private sale, and that the sale of that land be limited to abutting property
owners for attachment to abutting property and that the sale be subject to the covenant
(which shall run with the land) that the parcels be used only for cemetery
purposes:
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest
Quarter of Section 30, Township 117, Range 21, according to the Government
Survey thereof lying Northeasterly .of a line running from a point on the North
line of said parcel distant 180 feet West of the Northeast corner of said parcel
to a point on the East line of said parcel distant 200 feet south of the Northeast
corner of said parcel. Also,
That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest
Quarter, Section 30, Township 117, Range 21, according to the Government Survey
thereof lying Northwesterly of a line running from a point on the North fine of
said parcel distant 125 feet East of the Northwest corner of said parcel to a
point on the West line of said parcel distant 125 feet South of the Northwest
corner of said parcel.
_
Department of Revenue Form No. 107
.abflc et
PORTIONS OF
RECONVEYANCE OF FORFEITED LANDS TO STATE OF MINNESOTA
BY GOVERNMENTAL SUBDIVISIONS
1
WHEREAS, Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 282.01, Subdivision 1, the STATE
OF MINNESOTA, as trustee under Minnesota Statutes, Section 281.25 conveyed to The City of
Edina
_, a governmental subdivision, the lands hereinafter
described, to be used for an authorized public use, and
WHEREAS, Said governmental subdivision '1sXiX�ctacbcb�i�t��}I�ix
A4fciic7kuix4x�ttXVp�Z3Cx#las abandoned the public use for which such land was conveyed, and said
City of Edina now desires to reconvey said lands to the State of
Minnesota, as such trustee,
NOW, THEREFORE, This indenture, made this 8th day of January 19 85
between the City of Edina a governmental subdivision of the
State of Minnesota, as party of the first part, and the State of Minnesota, as trustee as hereinafter set forth,
as party of the second part,
WITNESSETH, That the said party of the first part, in consideration of the premises and
other valuable considerations, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby Grant, Bargain,
Quitclaim and Reconvey unto the said party of the second part all the tract or parcel of land lying and
being in the County of Hennepin in the State of Minnesota, described as follows, to -wit:
Exhibit A
in trust as provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 281.25, upon like conditions and with like effect
as if said lands had not been conveyed to said party of the first part as aforesaid.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD THE SAME, Together with all the hereditaments and
appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, to the said party of the second part and
its successors and assigns, Forever.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, Said party of the first part has caused these presents to
be executed in its corporate name by its Mayor
and its Clerk and its corporate seal to be
hereunto affixed the day and year first above written.
In Presence of:
City of Edina
Name of Governmental Subdivision
By
Its Mayor
By
Its City -Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA
County of ss.
On this 8th day of January I , 19 85 , before me,
a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared
C. Wayne Courtney and Marcella M. Daehn
to me personally known, who, being each by me duly sworn say that they are respectively
the Mayor and the City Clerk of the
governmental subdivision named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed to
said instrument is the corporate seal of said governmental subdivision, and that said
instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said governmental subdivision by authority
of its City Council and said Mayor
and City Clerk acknowledged said instrument to be the free
act and deed of said governmental subdivision.
-Strike out clause not applicable.
Exhibit A
Parcel 1
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest
Quarter.of Section 30, Township 117, Range 21, according to the Government
Survey thereof lying Northeasterly of a line running from a point on the North
line of said parcel distant 180 feet West of the Northeast corner of said parcel
to a point on the East line of said parcel distant 200 feet south of the
Northeast corner of said parcel. Also
Parcel 2
That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest
Quarter, Section 30, Township 117, Range 21, according to the Government
Survey thereof lying Northwesterly of a line running from a point on the North
line of said parcel distant 125 feet East of the Northwest corner of said parcel
to a point on the West line of said parcel distant 1,25 feet South of the Northwest
corner of said parcel.
4081C(14) :TSE:010384
�� A .-I
ORDINANCE NO. 812 -A2
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 812 TO REGULATE
CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF TELECOMMUNICATION,
TELEVISION AND RADIO ANTENNAS, EXTERIOR DISH ANTENNAS
AND SUPPORTING TOWERS, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 1 of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby amended to read
as follows:
"Section 1. Definitions. Words and phrases used in this
ordinance which are defined in Ordinance No. 825, as amended
from time to time, (said ordinance, as amended from time to
time, is herein called the "Zoning Ordinance "), shall be
construed herein according to their definitions contained in the
Zoning Ordinance. The following words and terms shall have the
following meanings in this ordinance:
(a) Antenna: equipment used for transmitting or
receiving telecommunication, television or radio
signals, which is located on the exterior of, or
outside of, any building or structure, and includes a
dish antenna.
(b) Dish Antenna: a parabolic shaped antenna
(including all supporting apparatus) which is used for
receiving telecommunication, television or radio
signals, which is located on the exterior of, or
outside of, any building or structure.
(c) Tower: any pole, spire or structure, or any
combination thereof, to which an antenna is attached,
or which is designed for an antenna to be attached,
and all supporting lines, cables, wires and braces."
Sec. 2. Sec. 2 of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"Sec. 2. Permit Required; Exemptions. No antenna or tower
of any kind shall hereafter be erected, constructed or placed,
or re- erected, reconstructed or replaced, anywhere within the
City without first making an application for and obtaining from
the City a permit therefor.
(a) Exemptions. No permit shall be required for
the following:
4081C(14):TSE:010384
M Dish antennas not greater than 30
inches in diameter or five square feet in
cross sectional area, which do not exceed
six feet in height.
(ii) All other towers or antennas which
do not exceed six feet in height.
(iii) Antennas and towers erected or
constructed by the City for City purposes."
Sec. 3. Sec. 3 of Ordinance 812 is hereby amended to read as follows:
"Sec. 3. Application for Permit; Issuance; Fees.
Application for a permit required by this Ordinance shall be
made to the Building Official in the same manner, and containing
the same information, as for a building permit pursuant to
Ordinance No. 406, as amended from time to time, and the
Minnesota State Building Code thereby adopted. Such permit
shall be issued by the Building Official. For a permit required
by this ordinance, an application fee as set forth in Ordinance
No. 171 shall be required for the purpose of defraying the cost
of examining and processing the application for permit and the
cost of inspecting the installation and maintenance of such
antennas, dish antennas and towers."
Sec. 4. Sec. 4 of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby divided into three
sections, being Sec. 4, 5 and 6, and is hereby amended to read as follows:
"Sec. 4. General Requirements. All antennas, towers and
dish antennas, including supporting wires, for which a permit is
required shall comply with the following requirements:
(a) All applicable provisions of Ordinance No.
406, including wind loading requirements set forth in
the Minnesota Building Code thereby adopted, as such
ordinance shall be amended from time to time.
(b) Antennas and towers shall be grounded for
protection against a direct strike by lightning and
shall comply, as to electrical wiring and connections,
with all applicable City and state statutes,
regulations and standards.
(c) No antenna or tower shall exceed a height
equal to the distance from the base of the antenna and
tower to the nearest overhead electrical power line
(except individual service drops), less five feet.
(d) Antennas or towers shall be protected to
discourage climbing by unauthorized persons.
-2-
4081C(14) :TSE:010384
(e) No antenna or tower shall have affixed to it
in any way any lights, reflectors, flashers or other
illuminating device, or any signs, banners or placards
of any kind, except one sign not over 10 square inches
indicating the name of the manufacturer and /or
installer.
(f) No tower shall have constructed thereon, or
attached thereto, in any way, any platform, catwalk,
crow's nest or similar structure.
(g) All towers shall be constructed of
corrosive - resistant steel or other corrosive - resistant,
non - combustible materials. Towers shall not be
constructed or made of wood, including timbers or logs.
(h) No part of any antenna or tower, nor any
lines, cables, equipment, wires or braces used in
connection with any tower or antenna shall, at any
time, extend across or over any part of a street,
sidewalk or alley."
"Sec. 5. Location.
(a) In all Zoning Districts as established by
the Zoning Ordinance:
(i) No part of any tower or antenna
shall be constructed, located or maintained,
at any time, permanently or temporarily,
within any setback required by the Zoning
Ordinance for an accessory building or
structure for the Zoning District in which
the antenna or tower is located. If no
accessory building or structure setback is
provided by the Zoning Ordinance, the
antenna or tower shall maintain all setbacks
required by the Zoning Ordinance for
principal buildings or structures.
(b) Additional requirements for lots in the R -1
and R -2 Zoning Districts as established by the Zoning
Ordinance other than lots developed with a conditional
use:
(i) Dish antennas greater than 30 inches
in diameter shall not be located on the roof
of a principal or accessory building.
(ii) Dish antennas shall only be located
in rear yards.
-3-
4081C(14):TSE:010384
(iii) No antennas or towers shall be
located in the front yard."
"Sec. 6. Height Restrictions.
(a) In the R -1 and R -2 Zoning Districts as
established by the Zoning Ordinance:
(i) No ground mounted tower shall be in
excess of 50 feet in height, measured from
the ground elevation at the base of the
tower to the highest point of the tower.
(ii) Towers mounted on a building or
structure shall not extend over 25 feet
above the highest point of the roof of the
building or structure.
(iii) Antennas shall not extend more than
15 feet above the highest point of a tower.
Antennas not mounted on a tower shall not be
in excess of 15 feet high, measured from the
highest point of the roof of the building to
which the antenna is attached to the highest
point of the antenna, or from the ground
elevation at the base of the antenna to the
highest point of the antenna.
(iv) Dish antennas shall not be in excess
of 15 feet in height, measured from the
ground elevation at the base of the antenna
to the highest point of the antenna.
(v) Dish antennas not greater than 30
inches in diameter, which may be mounted on
the roof pursuant to this ordinance, shall
not exceed six feet in height, measured from
the point at which the antenna is mounted to
the roof to the highest point of the antenna.
(b) In all other Zoning Districts as established
by the Zoning Ordinance:
(i) No antenna, no
with an antenna shall
height, measured from t
or antenna, whichever
highest point of' the
whichever is higher.
tower and no tower
exceed 75 feet in
he base of the tower
is lower, to the
antenna or tower,
-4-
4081C(14) :TSE:010384
(ii) Dish antennas shall have an overall
height of no more than 26 feet for either a
ground mount or roof mount."
Sec. 5. Sec. 5 (Existing Antennas and Towers; Continued Use;
Replacement) of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby renumbered Sec. 7.
Sec. 6. Sec. 6 (Lights and Signs; Crows' Nests) of Ordinance No. 812
is hereby deleted in its entirety.
Sec. 7. Sec. 7 of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby renumbered Sec. 8 and
is amended to read as follows:
"Sec. 8. Number of Towers and Antennas Allowed.
(a) In the R -1 and R -2 Zoning Districts as
established by the Zoning Ordinance: no more than one
exempt antenna, as defined in Sec. 2(a) of this
ordinance, one dish antenna and one tower requiring a
permit under the provisions of this ordinance shall be
allowed at any one time on any single lot.
(b) In other Districts zoned residential by the
Zoning Ordinance: no more than one exempt antenna, as
defined in Sec. 2(a) of this ordinance, one dish
antenna and one tower requiring a permit under the
provisions of this ordinance shall be allowed at any
one time on any single tract.
(c) In all Districts zoned other than
residential by the Zoning Ordinance: no more than one
exempt antenna as defined in Sec. 2(a) of this
ordinance, one tower over 20 feet in height, and two
dish antennas shall be allowed at any one time on any
single tract."
Sec. 8. Sec. 8 of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby renumbered Sec. 9 and
is amended to read as follows:
"Sec. 9. Variances. Variances from the literal provisions
of this ordinance shall be processed and granted or denied in
the same manner as variances are handled under Ordinance No.
825."
Sec. 9. Sec. 9 of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby renumbered Sec. 10 and
is amended to read as follows:
"Sec. 10. Abandoned Antennas and Towers; Removal. Any
antenna or tower which is not used for six successive months,
commencing after the effective date of this ordinance, shall be
-5-
4081C(14) :TSE:010384
deemed abandoned and may be required to be removed in the same
manner and pursuant to the same procedures as for dangerous or
unsafe buildings established by Ordinance No. 471 or by
Ordinance No. 406, as such ordinances are amended from time to
time, or by the Building Codes adopted by Ordinance No. 406, as
amended, or by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 463.15 to 463.26, as
amended."
Sec. 10. Sec. 10 of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby renumbered Sec. 11
and is amended to read as follows:
"Sec. 11. Violation; Penalty.
(a) Misdemeanor. Any person who shall violate
any provision of this ordinance shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor and subject to penalties pursuant to
Ordinance No. 175, as amended.
(b) Other Remedies. In addition to the
penalties imposed by Ordinance No. 175, as amended,
the City may exercise, with or separately from such
penalties, all and any other legal and equitable
remedies then available to the City by this ordinance,
or by statute, or other ordinances of the City, or by
applicable rules or regulations, to enforce this
ordinance, incl- uding, without limitation, injunction.
(c) Costs of Enforcement. The person or persons
violating this ordinance shall be jointly and
severally liable for all costs.incurred by the City in
enforcing this ordinance against such persons,
including, without limitation, attorneys' fees,
witness fees and administrative expenses, with
interest on such fees and expenses from the dates
incurred until paid at the highest rate then allowed
by law, and if no maximum rate be' established by law,
then at twelve (12 %) percent per annum, and shall also
be jointly and severally liable for all costs,
including attorneys' fees, of collecting such fees,
expenses and interest, with interest on such costs of
collection from the dates incurred until paid, at the
same rate as is payable on such fees and expenses."
Sec. 11. Sec. 11 (Partial Invalidity) and Sec. 12 (Interpretation)
of Ordinance No. 812 are hereby renumbered Sec. 12 and Sec. 13,
respectively.
-6-
4081C(14) :TSE:010384
Sec. 12. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately upon its passage and publication.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
-7-
Mayor
196'
Y�OF F.DINw
CHFC ;ISTER
01 -07-
PAGE 1
CHECK
N'O& oArL_
AMOJYT
V'V003
rMM OFSGRiPTTON
ACCOUNT Ml- TU- a D- 0_. _it
WLSSAGi.-
'I
007049
J,1/J.2/95
15.00
BJRE31 R)9ERT
MEETINGS
10- 2010- 000 -00
]774.49
01/C2f85
_ 26,50 RUREj41 RD9. -RT
M='TINGS
1fl- 2011- nio -0[1
41.5J f
ON7!64
J1/02/85
?83.70
TH =tM4L Ca
C04T REPAIRS
20- 2010 - ODD -00
783. 7 J
--
"I
--
rrrfrf
r ►f -CKS
=/
007091,
0.1/1.2/85
15.50
CITY O=- E)INA
PATER
23- 2010 - 000 -00
D,7G'.91
5.1 /)2185
15.57
Cr TI 0=_ E)IN4
WATER
27- 2010- 710 -0'3
___
C Cl. 7091
1/t?2%35
10 ",A5A - rIIYOFi
27- ?- 010--00 J-0 -^ - --- -
-- - -.
0J,7C91
-'2f 95
33.)0
CITY Or ETNA
yATci
28- 2010 - 010 -01
JJ.7J.91
U1/02/85
132 .1 6
CITY JF E)INA
HATER
50- 2010 - 000 -00
305.72 •
_...
fffrfr
- - --
ffr -CKS
-- -
u1/32/85
380-25 30.05
r_DutrN = +r WAY`!=
41:EAGE
10- 2010 - 009 -00
39@.?S = 30.05*
rf.frr
frr -CKS
J
00.712)
U.1/ ^2/_85
5.379.50
r10RS 7Y MIV)H.ORSJ
PRO SERV LFGA
10 -2010- 00.0 -0n—
59379.5)
'1-
,
Rffrff
f_f f�,
CKS_
"I
00A13:
JJ /0.Z/85
35.75
CITYdI)E 3= RVICES
CONT REPAIRS
57 -4248- 841 -84
1
I
36.75 a
--
-
,��fl
r■rr. r
f ff. CKS
7).7157
01102185
302.))
53T4 FRANC= BUS ASSV
DEJS
50- 4204 - 820 -82
..._ ._
It1I
-- ffr..►_
—_
__ - -.
-. *ff -CKS
-
:=
1J12)7
,;1102185
4.739.85
GRIGGS3E =R
INVENTORY
50- 2010 - 000 -00
�j
UU72J7
U.1/02195
4.606.95
GRIGGS BEER
INVENTORY
50- 2010 - 000 -00
99346.80
-
to
--
f■rf►.
—
rff -CKS
777218
01/02/E5
495.])
HALLIAV
LURRT�ANTS
10- 2010.]]0 -00
'
495.70
- --
C0124J.
21 /02/35
2003.10
FLORENCE NORBACK
CONSULTING
10- 4200 - 180 -18
1
2.000.00 .
"'
frrarf
--
rrr -CKS
•;I
�
1
1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -77 -85 PAGE 2
.i'E -K 47. DATE 540JNT V:11)r) ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT No, ING I P. n. n M- c' cA.GE
0 7256 3.1_/02/95 52.50 ICSE TELEPHONE 10_2010- 00�0^i
52.57
- -- 3J.1292 - -- .:1 /72/85
007292 !'1 /92185
-- .,^..13].4 - -- 1/2/95
s - *• -CKS_'
�! DJ.7217
.;1/02/85
00.7271
11/L.2/85
10- 4204 - 140 -14
�1/92/85
?I
102 71/02/1+5
Ou! ?77
..1 /0.2/85
.
- -- 3J.1292 - -- .:1 /72/85
007292 !'1 /92185
-- .,^..13].4 - -- 1/2/95
12,776.),) HIRRI!S iOM =YER C) INSURAVCE
1172.)3 HARRIS HOMEYER CO INSURANCE
139941.00 *
34.13 KVOX LU4B:R CO LUMB =R
34.)3 *
10- 4260 - 510 -51
10- 4260 - 560 -56
20- 2010 - 070 -00
••* -CKS
+• * -CK:
1
s - *• -CKS_'
396.60
1 C 4 4
DUES
10- 4204 - 140 -14
395.57 #
.
- 0(11345
31/1-12/85
r*i -CKS S
981.35
CIRLSOV PRINT'NG
PRINTING
10- 2010 - 000 -00
59.15
C%RLSOVI PRINTING
PRINTING
10- 2010 - 000 -00 _
114.65
f �Rl �!L PUN
PRINT -I4G
255.41
CARLSONI P?!NTiNG
PRINTING
10- 2010- )70 -00
217.53
CARLSOVI PRINT'NG
PRINTING
10- 2010 - 000 -00 _
•
^�
12,776.),) HIRRI!S iOM =YER C) INSURAVCE
1172.)3 HARRIS HOMEYER CO INSURANCE
139941.00 *
34.13 KVOX LU4B:R CO LUMB =R
34.)3 *
10- 4260 - 510 -51
10- 4260 - 560 -56
20- 2010 - 070 -00
••* -CKS
+• * -CK:
1
5� 00.7484 J.I/0.2/85
i
103.83 AMERICAN 34ARECD4 TELEPHDNE
10- 2010 - 000 -00
** *- CK S
J
i
.
- 0(11345
31/1-12/85
159V75C.99
M =T N Y4ST_ _ COMM
SEDER
40- 2010- OOQ -00
- - -..
159,75).99'1,
..
'
•
^�
#kkfif
`I
-- -
007359
:?.1/02/85
44.75
MINN T9R0 INC
REPAIR PARTS
27- 2010 - 000 -00
_
44.75 *
00.7360
0.1/02/85
20.5C
MINN_SDTA 4ANN'R
C04T REPAIRS
20 -2010- 000 -00
_
21.50 *
#.f f..
CKS
00.7379
J.1/3.2/85
35.40
M7-!R) FON= COMM
EQUIP RENAL
10- 2010 - 000 -00
17
35.40 •
*•• -CKS
_00.1454
'1/0,2/85
69.30
PRINTE113 SZRV E T C
EQUIP MAINT
8 -2 10 -100- QQ
69.37 #
,
5� 00.7484 J.I/0.2/85
i
103.83 AMERICAN 34ARECD4 TELEPHDNE
10- 2010 - 000 -00
t
193 TY--,OF EDINA C R:-* L P•STER 01-17 PAGE 3
1 -
Icc
Ql / ,2•2/85
22.10 Z = M:-)-IC,%;L'SERWTC-:*.. G--.4 SUPPLIES
•**-CKS
7
".k!tCK S ......
***-CKS
CKS
CKS
20- 2.010 - 0.00 -00
I J.f ro.3
01/02f85
114*70
FRA4(
i ZA,480NI CO
CONT REPAIRS
28-2910-000-00
114.70
Do/ r 0.4
0.1/0.2/85
19- P)' ,
RE= UN) TAX �.
10-2010-330-00
'I�
001704,
297,3Y'-
S.-IEE 41Y
Ois TRU
c C,TI ON
REFUNO,� METERS�
30-2010.000-00
31 ED .'
001705
J1102/85
33911
33.11
AM 3 A K:-';R
I s CO
CONCESSIONS
28- 2010 - 030 -00
01/02/85
25.00SN
SUS
FIRE
7.11
10- 2010 - 000 -00
-7-7
19!5 CITY
3z E31NA
CHECK REGISTER
01-)7-85 PAGE
CHECK NO.
DATE
A 4 OU,,q r
gf-'NDOI
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO, INV,
# �-Q- 11 MESSAGE
25.).) •
UJ 7 10 7
J1 fn2fg5
FRIC AUERSON
CONT SERV
10-2010-000-00
jif I Vt
U1/0.2/65
93,03
LOCI -LE KRAFT
AMIULANCE REFUND
10-2010-000-00
93.00 •
U 777.9
]1/02/85
45.10
.4
DJ r-.3
10-2010-300-00
45.00 •
Iii71)
011 ^.2/85
2?.13
6AM 4AIINT A5S3--
SUBSCRIPTION
10-2010-033-00
2800
.r 71 1
)1122/95
551.7:3
07:D:-* w--4S--L
SKkTr4G
20-2910-000-90
551. ".1 *
vP�7Q7712
J,1/32/85
15 ,R69.3
15,869. 33 *
CITY OF W)ODBURf
14,000.00
DUES
IJ-4204-140-14
0^.7713
U1102/85
59189.44
N! SS---N
CAP UTLAY
20-2010-000-00
5,189.44 •
00.7714
01/U2/85
?l 6. 13
FRID-74 AL:kTr-L
POSTA3---
10- 4290 - 510 -51
70,7115
"111.2 / 85
652.46
R T W C IN.':
INSURANCE
10-2010-000-03
652.49 *
007716
].1/02/45
65*10
PT AC
SCHOOLING.
10-4202-421-42
65.33, •
UV tl 7
J1/02/85
139.39
H :-' WL =-'Tn P I C < 4 D
SCHOOLING
10 -4202- 420 -42
1 30.0n- +
'?
00/718
J1/02/85
355.13
PTA.'
SC41ODL
10-4202-422-42
355.33 •
317710
J1/02/55
130.33
NUTSI:-'LL GRAINING
SC14 00 L
10-4202-421-42
130.30 •
I.
4-1�
13.1720
01/02/85
55.33
PTAC
SCIOOL
10-4202-421-42
-
55.03
007 721
J.1 /02/85
41.70
APC()
MEMBERSHIP
10-4204-421-42
41.33 •
001722
J1/02/85
60.00
ATOM
MEMBERSHIP
10-4204-420-42
U%7 72 3
J1/C2/85
151.42
CITY OF RrCIFI:-'L!)
POWER 9 LIGHTS
10-2010-000-00
153.42 *
•
A
lie
11 . '.
70J724
01 /3.2/85
11.31.
VET:'IAN3 37
ADV=RTisrNs
50-2010-330-00
DU.7724
01/02185
15.33
VETLRANS OF
ADVERTISING
50-2010-ODO-00
10
6IST_R 0
01 -01" PAGE 5
5 r
19F
TY OF ED'_NA
��0 0
CHE(
-, e
CHECK'NO,
W
DATE
443UNT
V =N�04
SD- 2010 >
ja I
V T i4VS )� --
1. f R . •
D 10 7aTg
6;600.77
1 UV'D 20.TOTe
16.SD .'
FJVJ 23.TOTA
169.81_
FJV_'J "Z7 _T.D?p
331:51.
FUVD ?S TOTAL
297. -0 U
FUSID 33 TOTAL
f
159.750 99.
Flu^ 40 Teel
ID
9,01.F.35
FJ,VD 5D 'TOTa
- - --
--
,
T jrY 11
I
? ,.
218,510.76
ti
I --
1
.
10
6IST_R 0
01 -01" PAGE 5
5 r
TTFM GF¢PRTPTTON a
arrnIINT -No,, r
��0 0
-
rNV u
u �
ADVERTISING S
SD- 2010 >
ja I