Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-01-21_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JANUARY 21, 1985 7:00 P.M. HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ROLLCALL MINUTES OF January 7, 1985, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by I. Set Hearing Date A. Property Disposition - Edinborough B. Amendment to Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area Plan EDINA CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATION OF COMMUNITY SERVICE AWARD - Del Edwards MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of November 5, December 3 and 17, and Special Meeting of December 28, 1984, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by I. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. First Reading of Zoning Ordinance requires offering of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass Second Reading or if Second Reading should be waived. Lot Divisions, Plats, Appeals from Administrative or Board of Appeals and Adjustments decisions require action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass. A. Zoning Change 1. Second Reading a. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to MD -5 Mixed Development District, Edinborough - Generally located west of York Avenue and south of West 76th Street (Contd from 1/7/85) (Continue to- 2/11/85) 2. First Reading a. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to POD -2 Planned Office District Opus Corporation /Normandale Golf Inc.. B. Preliminary Plat 1. Camelot West - Opus Corporation /Normandale Golf Inc. C. Final Development Plan 1. Edina Family Care Clinic - Generally located East of Vernon Avenue and north of Link Road D•. Set Hearing Date 1. Amendment to Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area Plan II. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS III. AWARD OF BIDS A. Grading of Van Valkenburg Park B. Indianhead Lake Treatments C. Repair Roof - Swimming Pool Bathhouse IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of January 15, 1985 B. West 70th Street Report C. Board /Commission Appointments D. Appointment to State CHS Advisory Committee E. Feasibility Report - Tree Trimming Project TT -03 - Set Hearing Date F. On -Sale Wine - License Report G. Revision of 8/6/84 Council Minutes - Easement Vacation for Lot 6, Block 1, The Habitat H; Project Approval & Authorization to Take Bids 1. Hansen Well Redevelopment 2. Bridge Redecking - Valley View Road /Soo.:Line Railroad. I• Solid Waste'Management J. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council K. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items 1. Traffic Safety Committee & Speed Awareness Program - January 28 i Agenda Edina City Council Page Two V. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass. A. Resolution Authorizing Participation in the Control Data Joint Comparable Worth Study VI. ORDINANCES. First Reading requires offering of Ordinance only. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote'to pass Second Reading. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass if Second Reading waived. A. First Reading (Waive Second Reading) 1. Ordinance No. 171 -A19 - To Correct Fee for Ventilation Work Permit VII. FINANCE A. Liquor Fund Report as of October 31, 1984 B. Claims Paid. Motion of seconded by for payment of the following Claims as per Pre -List dated 1/21/85: General Fund $171,667.73, Park Fundj$4,823.71, Art Center $4,003.54, Swimming Pool Fund $15.75, Golf Course Fund $3,109.90, Recreation Center Fund $14,185.50, Gun Range Fund $46.98, Waterwork Fund $6,509.76, Utility Fund $10,168.48, Liquor Dispensary Fund $352,175.79,,Construction Fund $2,281.37, Total $568,988.51 I MINUTES EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JANUARY 7, 1985 Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor Courtney. MINUTES of December 3, 1984, were approved as submitted by motion of Member Bredesen, seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned by motionj,of Member Turner, seconded by Member Richards. Motion carried. / Gordon L! H,hes Executive Director MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 5, 1984 Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner and Mayor Courtney. YOUTH APPRECIATION WEEK PROCLAIMED BY MAYOR. Mayor Courtney presented the following proclamation which was unanimously approved: PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the vast majority of youth are concerned, knowledgeable and responsible :citizens; and WHEREAS, the accomplishments and-achievements of these young citizens deserve recognition and praise of their elders; and WHEREAS, Optimists International has, since 1954, developed and promoted a program entitled Youth Appreciation Week; and WHEREAS, the citizens of the City of Edina have indicated a desire to join with the Optimists in expressing appreciation and approval of the contributions of the youth, the City Council of the City of Edina does, therefore, proclaim the second week in November as YOUTH APPRECIATION WEEK in the City of Edina. By this action let it be known that we have faith in the ability of today's youth as they assume responsible roles in the future of mankind. ADOPTED this 5th day of November, 1984. HEARING DATE SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS. As recommended by staff, Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Schmidt, setting November 19, 1984, as hearing date for the following planning matters: 1) Edinborough;:;- R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to MD -5 Mixed Development District - Generally located west of York Avenue and south of West 76th Street 2) Our Lady of Grace Church - Conditional Use Permit 3) Victorsen's Valley View 2nd Addition - Generally located south of Valley View Road and west of Brookview Avenue - Preliminary Plat Approval BID AWARDED FOR EDINA - BLOOMINGTON STORM SEWER PROJECT. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of bids for the storm sewer project at the Pentagon Park location per Edina's joint powers agreement with Bloomington. The lowest bidder was Austin P. Keller Construction Company, Inc. at $1,058,721.20 versus the engineer's estimate of $1,300,000.00. The necessary easements for the project have been received from property owners on the Edina side of the project. Member Schmidt's motion was seconded by Member Bredesen for award of bid to Austin P. Keller Construction Company for $1,058,321.20. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. GOLF COMMITTEE /PARK BOARD REPORT ON BRAEMAR APPROVED. Mr. Rosland introduced Joan Lonsbury, Chairman of the Park Board, who called forward Roger Harrold and Tass Von Schmidt -Pauli to identify the Braemar Golf Committee Report on the capital improvements proposed for the Braemar Golf Course: Renovation and expansion of the maintenance building, $200,000; expansion of the Par 3 to an Executive Course, $310,000; renovation and expansion of the Clubhouse, $600,000. Edina residents whose homes border on or are near the expansion area have been involved in meetings and tours of the proposed Executive Course layout, and the overall opinion is favorable. The Executive Course is projected to generate $150,000 in revenues and $100,000 on net profits the first full year of operation. Anticipated revenues in the first two years from events held in the year -round meeting /banquet room facility are $14,000 and $18;000 respectively. The $6.00 green fee for the Executive Course was questioned and cited as too high a rate for young people. The Committee made the following recommendations: 1) Approve their report as supporting evidence to the Park Board motion of August 9, 1983. 2) Approve the recommended start date of the Executive Course and maintenance building construction to begin in the spring of 1985, the Executive Course thereby becoming a revenue contributor to the City by 1986. 3) Approve the recommended start date of the Clubhouse expansion to begin in the spring of 1986. Member Turner's motion to approve the Golf Committee's report with its recommendations was seconded by Member Schmidt. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. 11/5/84 HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION BROCHURE /CONTINUATION OF NO -FAULT MEDIATION PROCESS APPROVED. Mr. Rosland introduced Ceil Smith who explained that the proposed brochure would describe to various employers the City's No -Fault Mediation Process for handling complaints of discrimination under the Minnesota Human Rights Act. Apparently, the recent reorganization of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights has resulted in an increase in referrals to the Edina Human Relations Commission, whose members are trained to conduct the no -fault process. Ceil stated that the proposed brochure would be mailed to businesses in Edina to increase awareness about the mediation service and understanding of both the benefits and limitations of the process. There being no questions or any further discussion, Member Bredesen's motion to approve this brochure was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. PERA ACTION NOTED. Mr. Rosland reported that the.Municipal Legislative Commission, of which Edina is a member, has adopted a resolution indicated that its member cities will withhold their employers' contributions for PERA and put those in an escrow account should appropriate action regarding the appointment of John Allers as interim PERA Director and related matters not be taken care of by the first of February, 1985. This action should have no impact on the retirement accounts of any of Edina's current or past employees; the only impact this would have on the City is that there would be a 5 to 6% penalty assessment for failure to pay, which could be made up by the investment on the money held in escrow. Should appropriate action not be taken by the first of February, a recommendation for action will be made to the Council. No action was taken. ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES REPORTS NOTED. Member Turner commented on the report from the Housing Committee with the proposed revisions to the Metropolitan Council's Housing Chapter. Member Turner added that she would like agenda time at their meeting on November 29, 1984. The minutes from AMM's Transportation Committee were referred to; complaints concerning Highway 18 and Bren were aired regarding the increased amount of traffic coming out of Opus, which was cited as Hennepin County's responsibility. Traffic light signals are the answer at some point in time. Member Turner suggested that this issue be put on the Traffic Safety Committee's agenda in December. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT REPORT SLATED FOR JANUARY. Mr. Rosland reminded the Council, that staff will be preparing the Capital Improvement report to bring back to Council in January, 1985. LIQUOR STORE OPERATION REPORT CITED. Mr. Rosland reported that individual reports are expected from the municipal liquor stores; meetings have been taking place with the private sector. A report is forthcoming concerning the whole municipal liquor store operation and'what direction the business is going to take. AGREEMENT APPROVED FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY LABORATORY SERVICES. Mr. Rosland presented the Hennepin County Laboratory Services Agreement and recommended its continuation. This Agreement allows the Hennepin County Health Department access to Edina's laboratory services on a fee per test basis. The fees have been raised an average of 7% to adjust for increased labor, rent and supply costs. Member Schmidt intro- duced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RRq(1T.TTTTON BE IT RESOLVED.by the Edina City Council that the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into Agreement No. 50014 with the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, whereby the County, through its Community Health Department, agrees to make payments to tfie City of Edina for analytical and microbiological laboratory support services,'for the term from January 1, 1985, through December 31, 1985. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 1353 -A1 (RELATING TO INDIVIDUAL MASSAGE LICENSES) GRANTED FIRST READING. Mr. Rosland presented a proposed amendment to Ordinance No. 1353 -A1 related to massage /sauna licenses. He explained that in 1982 staff had reviewed the possibility of amending this Ordinance to permit the issuance of individual licenses and not business licenses to businesses who had only a restricted number of masseuses and whose primary business was other than a massage service. No further action was taken at that time. Apparently, there are now enough individual masseuses in other -than- massage business services to warrant amending to permit the secondary massage services and to make the Ordinance enforceable against all massage services. 11/5/84 Member Richards then offered First Reading of Ordinance No. 1353 -A1 as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 1353 -A1 AN AMENDMENT TO THE ORDINANCE LICENSING AND REGULATING PHYSICAL CULTURE AND HEALTH SERVICES AND CLUBS, REDUCING CLUBS AND SALONS, MASSAGE PARLORS, SAUNA PARLORS, AND ESCORT SERVICES, TO EXEMPT CERTAIN BUSINESSES FROM THE REQUIREMENT TO OBTAIN A LICENSE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. Exemption from Business License Requirements. Sec. 2 of Ordinance No. 1353 is hereby amended by adding thereto a new paragraph (c) as follows: "(c) The preceding provisions of this section notwithstanding, no business as described in this section shall be required to obtain a license under this section if it meets all of the following criteria as evidenced by affidavits and other documents, including that set out at 4. below, submitted to and in form and substance reasonably acceptable to the City Clerk: 1. the principal activity of the business shall not be the performance of massage services; 2. the activity of the business is conducted and performed on the business premises; 3. no more than two persons licensed to perform massage services under this ordinance shall perform such massage services at any one time on the business premises; and 4. the annual gross revenue of the business from performing massage services is less than 25% of the total annual gross revenue of the business as shown by financial statements of the kind specified in Section 4 (a) 10 of this ordinance." Section 2. There is hereby added to paragraph (a) of Section 4, a new subparagraph 10 as follows: "10. A financial statement, certified as being true and correct by an independent accountant, showing the gross income of the business to be licensed for the then last three fiscal years of such business, or such shorter period of time that applicant may have been in the business to be licensed, itemized as to each activity of the business, including,.whithout limitation, the gross income from performing massage services." Section 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. Motion for First Reading of Ordinance No. 1353 -A1 was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner; Courtney Motion carried. CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Schmidt for payment of the following claims as per Pre -List dated 11/5/84: General Fund $296,809.66; Park Fund $6,290.19; Art Center $2,402.37; Swimming Pool Fund $17.48; Golf Course Fund $3,011.47; Recreation Center Fund $10,876.01; Gun Range Fund $9,344.98; Waterwork Fund $15,720.44; Sewer Rental Fund $162,651.85; Liquor Dispensary-Fund $4,524.92; Construction Fund $194,805.67; IMP Bond Redemption #2 $12,421.00; Total $719,176.04. There being no further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting adjourned at 8:35 P. M., Acting City Clerk MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL DECEMBER 3, 1984 Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner and Mayor Courtney. BOY SCOUT TROOP NO. 68 WELCOMED. Mayor Courtney welcomed members of Boy Scout Troop No. 68, from Good Samaritan Church in West Edina. EARL MEICHSNER RECOGNIZED. Mr. Rosland introduced Earl Meichsner stating that he has been an employee of the City since 1968 working in the position as health lab technician. Mr. Meichsner was commended for his excellent and thorough work in protecting the community's health and was presented with a silver pen bearing the Edina Logo. Members of the Council joined in expressing their appreciation of his dedication and efforts. MINUTES of the Regular Meetings of September 10, 1984 and October 15, 1984, were approved as submitted by motion of Member Schmidt, seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING ON ZONING CHANGE FROM R -1 TO MD -5 FOR EDINBOROUGH CONTINUED TO 12/17/84. As recommended by staff, Member Schmidt's motion was seconded by Member Turner to continue the public hearing on the zoning change from R -1 Single Dwelling Unit Dist- rict to MD -5 Mixed Development District for Edinborough, generally located west of York Avenue and south of West 76th Street, to the meeting of December 17, 1984. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR VICTORSEN'S VALLEY VIEW 2ND ADDITION DENIED BASED ON FINDINGS, DECISIONS AND REASONS. Planner Hughes recalled that the public hearing on preliminary plat approval for Victorsen's Valley View 2nd Addition was held at the Council Meeting of December 3, 1984. The request involves a proposed subdi- vision of an existing parcel of property on Brookview Avenue into two lots. Parcel A is the new lot that would be created and would receive its access by way of a 20 -foot wide strip to Brookview Avenue located to the east. The Council re- ,quested that staff prepare draft findings of facts concerning the proposed plat and subdivision variance. Mr. Hughes advised that Findings, Decisions and Reasons have been prepared and that copies had been delivered to Mr. /Mr.s..Folke Victorsen, their.attorney, and to two of the neighbors adjoining the subject property. No further comment being heard, Member Bredesen moved denial of the proposed Victorsen's Valley View 2nd Addition and the requested subdivision variance, based on the Findings, Decisions and Reasons prepared by staff (copy attached). Motion for denial was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR LOTS 11 AND 12, BLOCK 1, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 8TH ADDITION. Mr. Hughes presented a petition for division of Lots 11 and 12, Block 1, Parkwood Knolls 8th Addition, advising that the request is for party wall.divisions of two existing double bungalows. Individual utility connectons are provided and staff would recommend approval. No objections being heard, Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the-following described property is at present a single tract of land: Lot 12, Block 1, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 8TH ADDITION, and WHEREAS, the owner has requested the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: Northerly Parcel - Lot 12, Block 1, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 8TH ADDITION', according to the map or plat on file in the office of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota. That part of Lot 9, lying Northeasterly of a line drawn from the most Northerly corner of said lot to a point in the Southeasterly line of said lot, distant 15 feet from the most Southeasterly corner thereof, Block 1, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 8TH ADDITION, according to the map or plat on file in the office of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota. Except that part thereof which lies southerly of a line drawn westerly at an angle of 79 degrees 30 minutes 49 seconds from the east line of said Lot 12, measured from south to west, from a point therein distant 15.02 feet south of the northeast corner of said Lot 12; and Southerly Parcel - That part of the following described property: Lot 12, Block 1, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 8TH ADDITION, according to the map or plat 12/3/84 on file in the office of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota. That part of Lot 9, lying Northeasterly of a line drawn from the most Northerly corner of said lot to a point in the Southeasterly line of said_ lot, distant 15 feet from the most Southeasterly corner thereof, Block 1, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 8TH ADDITION, according to the map or plat on file in the office of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota. Which lies southerly of a line drawn westerly at an angle of 79 degrees 30 minutes 49 seconds from the east line of said Lot 12, measured from south to west, from a point therein distant 15.02 feet south of the northeast corner of said Lot 12; WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR LOT 6, BLOCK 1, REPLAT OF PART OF GRANDVIEW PLATEAU. Mr. Hughes presented a petition for division of Lot 6, Block 1, Replat of Part of Grandview Plateau, advising that the applicant requests a party wall division of an existing double bungalow. Individual utility connections are not provided for each unit. The City Building Official reports that a waiver of the separate utility connection requirement is warranted in this case. Staff would therefore recommend approval, subject to the issuance of the waiver. No objections being heard, Member Bredesen offered the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject to the issuance of a waiver by the Building Official: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land: Lot 6, Block 1, REPLAT OF PART OF GRANDVIEW PLATEAU, and WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels" described as follows: North Parcel - That part of Lot 6 lying North of a line running from a .point in the West line of Lot 6, distant 53.98 feet South of the Northwest corner of Lot 6 to a point in the East line of Lot 6, distant 54.09 feet- South of the Northeast corner thereof, all in Block 1, REPLAT OF PART OF GRANDVIEW PLATEAU and South Parcel - That part of Lot 6 lying South of a line running from a point in the West line of Lot 6, distant 53.98 feet South of the North - west corner of Lot 6 to a point in the East line of Lot 6, distant 54.09 feet South of the Northeast corner thereof, all in Block 1, REPLAT OF PART OF GRANDVIEW PLATEAU: WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interefere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval. of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner,'Courtney Resolution adopted. 12/3/84 LOT DIVISION, APPROVED FOR LOTS 12 AND 13, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 161. Mr. Hughes presented the petition for division of Lots 12 and 13, Auditor's Sub- division No. 161, located at 4412 Grimes Avenue South. The proposed lot division involves three existing parcels at 45th and Grimes. Parcel A is the applicant's homesite which fronts on Grimes. Parcel B, which is also owned by the applicant, fronts on 45th Street and is vacant except for a small garage which has recently been constructed. Parcel C is the developed single family lot fronting on 45th Street. The applicant requests a division whereby the westerly 20 feet of Parcel B will be conveyed.to and attached to Parcel C and the remainder of Parcel B will be retained by the applicant and attached to Parcel A. A detached accessory garage is proposed for that part of Parcel B owned by the applicant. The pro- posed subdivision will result in three non - conforming parcels being combined,to make two parcels which more closely conform to ordinance requirements. Staff would therefore recommend approval. No objections being heard, Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate parcels: The east 1/2 of Lot 13 and the east 50 feet of the west 100 feet of that part of Lot 12 lying south of the north 50 feet thereof all in Auditor's Subdivision No. 161, and WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide and combine said tracts into the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels "): Lot 13, except the east 30 feet thereof; That part of Lot 12 lying south of the north 50 feet thereof, except that part thereof which lies east of a line drawn parallel with and 30 feet west of the east line of said Lot 13 and its extension; All in Auditor's Subdivision No. 161, Hennepin County, Minnesota and That part of Lots 12 and 13, Auditor's Subdivision No. 161, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies east of a line drawn parallel with and 30 feet west of the east line of said Lot 13 and its extension. Except the north 50 feet of that part of said Lot 12. WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and-825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. HEARING DATES SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS. As recommended by staff, Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Turner, setting December 17, 1984, as hearing date for the following planning matters: 1) Indian Hills 2nd Addition - R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District - Generally located west of Gleason and south of the Crosstown Highway 2) Crossview Lutheran Church - Conditional Use Permit 3) Ordinance No. 812 -A2 - Regulating Construction and Maintenance of Radio and Television Antennas, Exterior Dish Antennas, and Supporting Towers. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. PORTION OF CONCORD AVENUE VACATED SUBJECT TO CONDITION. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Engineer Hoffman advised that the request is to vacate a small portion of Concord Avenue located north of Golf Terrace. He recalled -that at the assessment hearing for Golf Terrace held on September 17, 1984, the 50 foot right of way for Concord Avenue which has never been constructed was included in the proposed assessment to the abutting properties at 4610 and 4700 Golf Terrace. The Council at that time had indicated that staff should initiate a petition to formally vacate the subject right of way. Mr. Hoffman stated that this public hearing is being held to accomplish that objective, that the abutting property owners would be glad to have the right of way vacated. He noted that Edwin C. Moore, 4610 Golf Terrace, 12/3/84 had questioned whether there was any concern that the right of way be kept open for future golf course development. Staff's opinion is that if there ever were future development that access should be by way of Wooddale Avenue and would therefore recommend that the right of way be vacated. Mr. Hoffman pointed out that Northern States Power Company and Minnegasco Company have no objection to the proposed vacation. No response has been received from Northwestern Bell Telephone Company and the vacation should be granted subject to their approval. No comment or objections being heard, Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved adoption, subject to approval by Northwestern Bell Telephone Company: RESOLUTION VACATING PORTION OF RIGHT OF WAY OF CONCORD AVENUE WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 15th day of October, 1984, fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of portion of right of way of Concord Avenue; and WHEREAS, two week's published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the hearing was held on the 3rd day of December 1984, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said street vacation be made; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered the extent to which the vacation affects existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such street or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described portion of Concord Avenue be and is hereby vacated effective as of December 3, 1984: That portion of Concord Avenue as dedicated in Hansen and Parks 1st Addition Country Club District and in Golf Terrace Heights Addition lying between the North line of said Additions and the North line of Golf Terrace, a street dedicated in said additions. No easements were involved in said vacation, and the Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice -of completion of proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County Auditor, and filed with the Register of Deeds in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Seciton 412.851. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards,.Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. BID AWARDED FOR COLLECTION OF GARBAGE AND REFUSE /CITY PROPERTIES Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of bids for collection of garbage and refuse for City properties, advising that the bid specifications asked the bidders to bid for both 1985 and an option for 1986. The bids were as follows: 1985 1986 Estimated Estimated $ per yd Cost $ per yd Cost BFI $2.29 $12,551.49 $2.47 $13,538.07 Quality Waste Control 2.73 13,202.50 2.95 14,258.70 G & H Sanitation 2.85 15,000.00 3.10 16,100.00 Member Turner = .moved award.of bid.for collection of garbage and__refuse:_for_City.1 properties to recommended low bidder, Browning- Ferris Industries, at $12,551.49 for 1985 and $13,538.07 for 1986. Motion was seconded by Member Bredesen. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. YEAR -END COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULED FOR 12/28/84. As recommended by staff, Member Schmidt's motion was seconded by Member Turner setting the year -end Council Meeting for December 28, 1984, at 5:00 p.m. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland called the Council's attention to the annual list of all Member -at -Large appointments to various Hennepin County committees with terms commencing at various times throughout the year. He suggested that names of persons for appointment be given him for for- warding to the Clerk of the County Board. No action taken. AMM LEGISLATIVE POLICIES FOR 1985 REVIEWED. Mr. Rosland advised that staff has reviewed the proposed Legislative Policies for 1985 of the Association of Metro - politan Municipalities (AMM) and have no objections or significant alterations to recommend except as follows: 12/3/85 1) Taxi Cab Regulations - Recommend that licensing of drivers and vehicles together with vehicle inspection be done by the State. 2) Local Government Aids - Advocate an overall reduction in the level of state support to all local units with a corresponding reduction in the levels of State taxation as an effort to improve the business climate. 3) Shade Tree Disease Control Program Oppose County funding on the property tax, and recommend that funding should be a local community decision. After a.brief discussion thereon, Mr. Rosland stated he would present these positions at the AM14's General Meeting on December 6, 1984. I.C.M.A. RETIREMENT PLAN TRUST TO BE CONSIDERED AT NEXT MEETING. Mr. Rosland advised that staff would like to continue consideration of the I.C.M.A Retire- ment Plan Trust to the next Council Meeting. Member Schmidt's motion was seconded by Member Turner to continue the matter to the meeting of December 17. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. COUNTY APPROVES RECOMMENDATION FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS ON VERNON AVENUE. Member Turner commented that she was pleased to learn that Hennepin County had approved the City's recommendation for traffic signals on Vernon Avenue and Bren Road and Hwy. 18. SHHSC BOARD APPOINTMENT DISCUSSED. Member Turner advised that she had submitted one name for appointment to the South Hennepin Human Services Council to fill the vacancy following the resignation of Sally Tang. Mayor Courtney commented that if not filled sooner, board /commission appointments will be made as of February 1, 1985. LETTER FROM LINDA YOHN REGARDING WINE LICENSING NOTED. Member Schmidt noted that the Council Members had received a letter from Linda Yohn, 6612 Hillside Lane, stating her opposition to wine licensing for the City. E. BUSH LAKE ROAD /78TH STREET DISCUSSED. Member Schmidt inquired about the County's plan for traffic signals at E. Bush Lake Road /78th Street. Mr. Hoffman advised that the 78th Street corridor has become very busy as a result of all the development by Bloomington on the north side of #494. Hennepin County intends to construct signals at E. Bush Lake Road and -78th Street as soon as funds are available. He added that the City staff has been working with the Bloomington staff to look at 78th Street with regard to traffic volumes and turning movements. No action was taken. DEAD -END SIGN FOR STREET INTO SOUTH HAVEN APARTMENTS DISCUSSED. Mayor Courtney stated that he had a request from residents living at the South Haven Apartments to make the "Dead End" sign more conspicuous in an effort to eliminate the entry and turning around of cars who do not see the sign. Mr. Hoffman responded that the signage would be checked by staff. EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TO SPONSOR EDINA DAY AT MINNESOTA TWINS GAME IN JUNE. Mr. Rosland advised that the Edina Chamber of Commerce is sponsoring an "Edina Day" at the Minnesota Twins game on June 25, 1985, and is hoping for a large delegation of residents of the community who will attend. ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A18 (DOG LICENSE FEE) ADOPTED; SECOND READING WAIVED. Mr. Ros- land advised that staff would recommend the fee for dog license be increased to $20.00 per dog or $7.00 per neutered dog, noting that there has been no increase in these fees for a number of years. Chief Swanson pointed out that the City is converting to a permanent license number system for dogs and that renewal notices will be mailed out each year. No objections being heard, Member Bredesen intro- duced Ordinance No. 171 -A18 and moved adoption with waiver of Second Reading as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A18 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 171 TO INCREASE THE FEE FOR DOG LICENSE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. The amount of the following described Fee Number to Ordinance No. 171 is hereby amended to read as follows: ORD. SEC. NO. NO. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT 312 10 Dog license Sec. 2. This ordinance passage and publication for and thereafter. Motion for adoption of the of Schedule A $20.00 per dog or $7.00 per neutered dog shall be in full force and effect following all dog licenses to be effective January 1, Drdinance was seconded by Member Turner. FEE NO. 7f its 1985, 12/3/84 Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: Richards Ordinance adopted. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Bredesen for payment of the following claims as per Pre -List dated 12/3/84: General Fund $102,106.22, Park Fund $118,451.21, Art Center $1,516.89, Golf Course Fund $2,869.86, Recreation Center Fund $1,461.29, Gun Range Fund $780.30, Waterwork Fund $35,938.92, Sewer Rental Fund $20,952.22, Liquor Dispensary Fund $2,034.95, Construction Fund $1,440.77, Total $287,633.63. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. There being no further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m. City Clerk MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL DECEMBER 17, 1984 Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner and Mayor Courtney. EDINA MASONIC LODGE THANKED FOR $1,500 CONTRIBUTION. Stephen Sather and Robert Soelberg presented a check in the amount of $1,500 to -the City for use by the Fire Department for rescue equipment, pointing out that this money came from the proceeds of the Edina Masonic Lodge Annual Pancake Breakfast. The following resolution was unanimously adopted by the Council and read by Mayor Courtney: RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION WHEREAS, for the past seven years, the Edina Masonic Lodge has donated money to the Edina Fire Department for its rescue equipment; and WHEREAS, this money has been earned by members of the Lodge from their efforts in putting on an annual Edina Flapjack Festival; and WHEREAS, a check in the amount of $1,500 has been generously given to the Edina Fire Department for purchase of rescue equipment; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that most sincere appreciation be expressed to all members of the Edina Masonic Lodge for its interest in the well -being of all Edina residents through this generous contribution; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be entered into the pages of the Minutes Book of the Edina City Council and that an appropriate copy be presented to the EDINA MASONIC LODGE as a token of the gratitude of the Edina City Council. RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION - JUNE A. SCHMIDT. The following resolution was unanimously adopted by the Council and read by Mayor Courtney: RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION WHEREAS, June A.Schmidt has served the residents of the City of Edina as Council Member for the years 1974 through 1984; and WHEREAS, June A. Schmidt has also served on the Edina Advisory Board of Health, the South Hennepin Human Services Council, the'Housing Needs Committee, the Edina Governmental Commission, the Environmental Quality Commission; and WHEREAS, June A. Schmidt has been a Commissioner of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority; and WHEREAS, she has been particularly sensitive to the health and welfare of the people of Edina as evidenced by her activities in the various organizations in which she has been involved; and WHEREAS, June A. Schmidt is held in high esteem by the residents of the City, as well as other Members of the City Council and by the City staff; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council, the City staff and all the residents of Edina hereby express their thanks and appreciation to JUNE A. SCHMIDT for her tireless efforts in and sincere dedication to making the City of Edina an outstanding community. ADOPTED this 17th day of December, 1984. Following presentation of the Resolution to Member Schmidt, Member Richards on behalf of the Council presented her with a silver tray engraved "June A. Schmidt, Edina City Council, 1974- 1984." City Manager Rosland then presented her with a silver pen bearing the Edina Logo and expressed the appreciation of the City staff.for her dedicated service as Council Member. - MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of September 17, 1984 and Budget Meetings of September 10, 17, 24 and 26, 1984, were approved as presented by motion of Member Turner, seconded by Member Schmidt. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING ON ZONING CHANGE FROM R -1 TO MD- 5 /EDINBOROUGH CONTINUED TO 1/7/85. As recommended by staff, Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Turner to continue the public hearing on the zoning change from R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to MD -5 Mixed Development District for Edinborough, generally located west of York Avenue and south of West 76th Street, to the meeting of January 7, 1985. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR INDIAN HILLS 2ND ADDITION (CROSS VIEW CHURCH. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Hughes presented the request of Cross View- Lutheran Church for preliminary approval of the revised plat of Indian Hills 2nd Addition, generally located west of Gleason Road and south of the Crosstown Highway. He recalled that on June 18, 12/17/84 1984, the Council gave preliminary plat approval for a seven lot R -2 District subdivision of that portion of the Cross-View Lutheran Church property which adjoins McCauley Trail. The applicants are now requesting a modification of the approved preliminary plat for the purpose of subdividing..an additional portion of the Church property. The revised plat shows the seven R -2 lots fronting on McCauley Trail as originally approved, plus eight lots which front on a new cul de sac which extends southerly from McCauley Trail. These eight new lots are proposed to remain R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. These lots range from 11,850 square feet to 20,700 square feet and most of these lots are 100 feet in width. He noted that Lot 1, Block 1, of the proposed plat measures five acres in area and would be retained by the Church. A conditional use permit has been applied for by the Church to facili- tate a proposed expansion. The Community Development and Planning Commission reviewed the revised plat at their November 28, 1984 meeting and recommended approval of the subdivision subject to the same conditions as the original proposal: 1) subdivision dedication, 2) signed developer's agreement which .includes the extension of sanitary sewer mains and the extension of a storm sewer, 3) conservation restriction covering the wetland area, 4) grant of easements to facilitate storm sewer.extensions, 5) grant of D.N.R. permit, and 6) petition to install permanent street surfacing and curb and gutter on McCauley Trail West abutting the R -2 lots and the church site. Mr. Hughes noted that Charles Sedgwick and Cal Kuhlman of the Church's building committee were present to answer questions. No questions or comments being heard, Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved adoption; subject to conditions as outlined by staff./ RESOLUTION FOR REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF INDIAN HILLS 2ND ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain revised plat entitled "Indian Hills 2nd Addition ", platted by Gustafson and Associates, a Minnesota Corporation, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of December 17, 1984, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVED FOR CROSS VIEW. LUTHERAN CHURCH (6645 McCAULEY TRAIL). Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered - placed on file. Mr. Hughes presented the request of Cross View Lutheran Church, 6645 McCauley Trail, for a conditional use permit for the purpose of constructing a 12,000 square foot, two -story addition. The proposed addition will be located on the east side of the existing building in an area partially occupied by an unsurfaced parking area. The first level of the proposed addition would contain classrooms and related facilities for Sunday School use. The second level would contain a large meeting room, lounge, a kitche, and storage areas. The existing sanctuary which contains pew seating for about 300 would remain unchanged. A new 62 -car parking lot would be constructed to .:... the south of the proposed addition. Plans show an expansion potential of 48 addi- tional parking spaces which would be constructed if more seating is provided in the sanctuary in the future. Total parking complies with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. At its meeting of November 28, 1985, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit, subject to receipt-of-suitable grading and landscape plans. Mr. Hughes advised that those plans have been submitted and have been reviewed by staff. Additional conditions were that building materials for the addition must match existing materials, the church must be connected to sanitary sewer in- conjunction with the expansion, and that no additional seating can be provided in the sanctuary without the construction of additional parking. No comment being heard, Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject to conditions as outlined by staff: RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WHEREAS ", the procedural requirements of Ordinance No. 825 (The Zoning Ordinance) have been met, and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Findings as required by Ordinance No. 825 have been satisfied; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit to Cross View Lutheran Church, at 6645 McCauley Trail, for the purpose of constructing a 12,000 square foot, two -story addition to their existing building, according to plans submitted; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Permit be subject to the following conditions: 1) Building materials for the addition must match the existing materials. 2) The .Church must be connected to sanitary sewer in conjunction with the expansion. 3) No additional seating can be provided in the sanctuary without the construction of additional parking. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Richards. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. 12/17/84 ORDINANCE NO. 812 -A2 (ANTENNAS) GRANTED FIRST READING. Planner Craig Larsen presented Ordinance No. 812 -A2 To Regulate Construction /Maintenance of Tele- communication, Television and Radio Antennas, Dish Antennas and Supporting Towers, for First Reading advising that the amendment is proposed to 1) revise some of the requirements in the ordinance and make the language more understand- able and in conformity with the new Zoning Ordinance, and 2) to establish a standard for dealing with dish antennas. The proposed amendment would replace all sections of the existing ordinance except for Section 5 which establishes a 15 -year period amortization for existing non - conforming antennas and Section 9 which provides for removal of abandonned towers or six months of non -use. Mr. Larsen pointed out that the amendment would establish general standards for all zoning districts; requirements for the R -1 and R -2 Districts and for all other zoning districts. He then reviewed the general requirements under the proposed amendment, the requirements for residential purposes in the R -1 and R -2 District and the requirements for all other zoning districts. He stated that he has met with several installers of satellite dish antennas and also several local ham radio operators and they have raised no objections to the pro- posed amendment. Mr. Rosland emphasized that adoption of the proposed ordinance would allow the installation of 12 -foot dish antennas in rear yards of residences. Member Turner stated that with the rapid development of the technology in this field, more than two dish antennas may be needed in the future for zoning districts other than R -1 and R -2, but that she felt the restriction to two is appropriate at this time. No other comment being heard, Member Turner offeredOrdinance No. 812 -A2 for First Reading as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 812 -A2 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINACE NO. 812 TO REGULATE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF TELECOMMUNICATION, TELEVISION AND RADIO ANTENNAS, EXTERIOR DISH ANTENNAS AND SUPPORTING TOWERS, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 1 of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 1. Definitions. Words and phrases used in this ordinance which are defined in Ordinance No. 825, as amended from time to time, (said ordinance, as amended from time to time, is herein called the "Zoning Ordinance "), shall be construed herein according to their definitions contained in the Zoning Ordinance. The following words and terms shall have the following meanings in this ordinance:" (a) Antenna: equipment used for transmitting or receiving telecommunication, television or radio signals, which is located on the exterior of, or outside of, any building or structure, and includes a dish antenna. (b) Dish Antenna: a parabolic shaped antenna (including all supporting apparatus) which is used for receiving telecommunication, television or radio signals, which is located on the exterior of, or outside of, any .building or structure. (c) Tower: any pole, spire or structure, or any combination thereof, to which an antenna is attached, or which is designed for an antenna to be attached, and all supporting lines, cables, wires and braces." Sec. 2. Sec. -2.of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Sec. 2. Permit Required; Exemptions. No antenna or tower of any kind shall hereafter be erected, constructed or placed, or re- erected, reconstructed or replaced, anywhere within the City without first making an application for and obtaining from the City a permit therefor. (a) Exemptions. No permit shall be required for the following: .,(i) Dish antennas not greater than 30 inches in diameter or five square feet in cross sectional area, which do not exceed six feet in height. (ii) All other towers or antennas which do not exceed six feet in height. (iii) Antennas and towers erected or constructed by the City for City purposes." Sec. 3. Sec. 3 or Ordinance No. 812 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Sec. 3. Application for Permit; Issuance; Fees. Application for a permit required by this Ordinance shall be made to the Building Official in the same manner, and containing the same information, as for a building permit pursuant to Ordinance No. 406, as amended from time to time, and the Minnesota State Building Code thereby adopted. Such permit shall be issued by the Building Official. For a permit required by this ordinance, an application fee as set forth in Ordinance No. 171 shall be required for the purpose of defraying the cost of inspecting the installation and maintenance of such antennas, dish antennas and towers." Sec. 4. Sec. 4 or Ordinance No. 812 is hereby divided into three sections, being Sec. 4, 5 and 6, and is hereby amended to read as follows: "Sec. 4. General Requirements. All antennas, towers and dish antennas, including supporting wires, for which a permit is required shall comply with the following requirements: 12/17/84 (a) All applicable provisions of Ordinance No. 406, including wind loading - requirements set forth in the Minnesota Building Code thereby adopted, as such ordinance shall be amended from time to time. (b) Antennas and towers shall be grounded for protection against a direct strike by lightning and shall comply, as to electrical wiring and connect- ions, with all applicable City and state statutes, regulations and standards. (c) No antenna or tower shall exceed a height equal to the distance from the base of the antenna and tower to the nearest overhead electrical power line (except individual service drops), less five feet. (d) Antennas or towers shall be protected to discourage climbing by unauthorized persons. (e) No antenna or tower shall have affixed to it in any way any lights, reflectors, flashers or other illuminating device, or any signs, banners or placards of any kind, except one sign.not over 10 square inches indicating the name of the manufacturer and /or installer. (f) No tower shall have constructed thereon, or attached thereto, in any way, any platform, catwalk, crow's nest or similar structure. (g) All towers shall: be constructed of corrosive - resistant steel or other corrosive - resitant, non - combustible materials. Towers shall not be con- structed or made of wood, including timbers or logs. (h) No part of any antenna or tower, nor any lines, cables, equipment, wires or braces used in connection with any tower or antenna shall, at any time, extend across or over any part'of a street, sidewalk or alley." Sec. 5. Location. (a) In all Zoning Districts as established by the Zoning Ordinance: (i) No part of any tower or antenna shall be constructed, located or maintained, at any time, permanently or temporarily, within any setback required by the Zoning Ordinance for an accessory building or structure for the Zoning District in which the antenna or tower is located. If no accessory building or structure setback is provided by the Zoning Ordinance, the antenna or tower shall maintain all setbacks required by the Zoning Ordinance for principal buildings or structures. (b) Additional requirements for lots in the R -1 and R -2 Zoning Districts as established by the Zoning Ordinance: (i), Dish antennas greater than 30 inches in diameter shall :not.be located on the roof-of a.principal or.accessory building. (ii),-Dish antennas shall only be located in rear yards. (iii). No antennas or towers shall be located in the front yard." Sec. 6. Height Restrictions. . (a) In the R -1 and R -2 Zoning Districts as established by the Zoning Ordinance: (i) No ground mounted tower shall be in excess of 50 feet in height, measured from the ground elevation at the base of the tower to the highest point of the tower. (ii) Towers mounted to a building or structure shall not extend over 25 feet above the highest point of the roof of the building or structure. (iii) Antennas shall not extend more than 15 feet above the highest point of a tower. Antennas not mounted on a tower shall not be in excess of 15 feet high, measured from the highest point of the roof of the building to which the antenna is attached to the highest point of the antenna, or from the ground elevation at the base of the antenna to the highest point of the antenna. (iv) Dish antennas shall not be in excess of 15 feet in height, measured from the ground elevation at the base of the antenna to the highest point of the antenna. (v) Dish antennas not greater than 30 inches in diameter, which may be mounted on the roof pursuant to this ordinance, shall not exceed six feet in height, measured from the point at which the antenna is mounted to the roof to the highest point of the antenna. (b) In all other Zoning Districts as established by the Zoning Ordinance: (i) No antenna, tower or antenna with tower shall exceed 75 feet in height from the base of the antenna to the highest point of the antenna or tower, whichever is higher. (ii) Dish antennas shall have an overall height of no more than 26 feet for either a ground mount or roof mount. Sec. 6. Sec. 6 (Lights and Signs; Crow's Nests) of Ordinance No. 812 is .hereby deleted in its entirety. Sec. 7. Sec. 7 of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby renumbered Sec. 8 and is amended to read as follows: "Sec. 8. Number of Towers and Antennas Allowed. (a) In the R -1 and R -2 Zoning Districts as established by the Zoning Ordinance: no more than one exempt antenna, as defined in Sec. 2(a) of this ordinance, one dish antenna and one tower requiring a permit 12/17/84 under the provisions of this ordinance shall be allowed at any one time on any single lot. (b) In other Districts zoned residential by the Zoning Ordinance: no more than one exempt antenna, as defined in Sec. 2(a) of this ordinance, one dish antenna and one tower requiring a permit under the provisions of this ordinance shall be allowed at any one time on any single tract. (c) In all Districts zoned other than residential by the Zoning Ordinance: no more than one exempt antenna as defined in Sec. 2(a) of this ordinance, one tower over 20 feet in height, and two dish antennas shall be allowed at any one time on any single tract." Sec. 8. Sec. 8 of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby renumbered Sec. 9 and is amended to read as follows: "Sec. 9. Variances. Variances from the literal provisions of this ordinance shall be processed and granted or denied in the same manner as variances are handled under Ordinance No. 825." Sec. 9. Sec. 9 of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby renumbered Sec. 10 and is amended to read as follows: "Sec. 10. Abandoned Antennas and Towers; Removal. Any antenna or tower which is not used for six successive months, commencing after the effective date of this ordinance, shall be deemed abandoned and may be required to be removed in the same manner and pursuant to the same procedures as for dangerous or unsafe buildings established by Ordinance No. 471 or by Ordinance No. 406, as such ordinances are amended from time to time, or by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 463.15 to 463.26, as amended." Sec. 10. Sec. 10 of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby renumbered Sec. 11 and is amended to read as follows: "Sec. 11. Violation; Penalty. (a) Misdemeanor. Any person who shall violate any provision of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to penalties pursuant to Ordinance No. 175, as amended. (b) Other Remedies. In addition to the penalties imposed by Ordinance No. 175, as amended, the City may exercise, with or separately from such penalties, all and any other legal and equitable remedies then available to the City by this ordinance, or by statute, or other ordinances of the City, or by applicable rules or regulations, to enforce this ordinance, including, without limitation, injunction. (d) Costs of Enforcement. The person or persons violating this ordinance shall be jointly and severally liable for all costs incurred by the City in enforcing this ordinance against such persons, including, without limitation, attorneys' fees, witness fees and administrative expenses, with interest on such fees and expenses from the dates incurred until paid at the highest rate then allowed by law, and if no maximum rate be established by law, then at twelve (12 %) percent per annum, and shall also be jointly and severally liable for all costs, including attorneys' fees, of collecting such fees, expenses and interest, with interest on such costs of collection from the dates incurred until paid, at the same rate as is payable on such fees and expenses." Sec. 11. Sec. 11 (Partial Invalidity) and Sec. 12 (Interpretation) of Ordinance No. 812 are hereby renumbered Sec. 12 and Sec. 13, respectively. Sec. 12. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. REPORT GIVEN ON REDEVELOPMENT OF.BILTMORE MOTEL SITE. Mr. Hughes recalled that the Biltmore Motel site was rezoned several months ago and subsequently the Council has reviewed alternate plans for the site on several occasions. The latest plan proposed 88 condominium units for the site. The applicant, Johnson Building Company, reports that he has been unable to finance this project and has asked that the City consider as an alternative a rental building designed for the elderly. To this end, Johnson Building Company has joined with the Stuart Corporation to pursue such a development. Mr. Hughes advised that staff has met with Johnson and Stuart to discuss the proposal. The project is nearly identical to the elderly high -rise proposed for Edinborough, i.e. a market rate rental building with 20% of the units rented at lower rates for moderate income tenants. Congregate dining and other services may also be provided. The developers are requesting that the City /HRA consider assisting the development through: 1) the issuance of Housing Revenue Bonds (tax exempt financing similar to Industrial Development Bonds) and 2) a land write -down and /or an annual interest rate reduction payment to lower interest costs of the project thereby reducing rents to a competitive level. These financing mechanisms are identical to those proposed for the Edinborough project. Staff has advised the developers that prior to preparing a specific plan and proposal for the project, the Council /HRA should conceptually review the financing mechanisms noted above. Staff has noted to them that, despite the Council's concept approval of Edinborough, the City is philosophically opposed to 12/17/84 tax exempt financing and assisting market rate housing. Staff also advised that Council may not equate this project with Edinborough which provides a broad range of housing types and substantial public participation in many facets of the deve- lopment. Mr. Hughes pointed out that staff has also expressed concern with two other aspects of the project. First, is concern as to whether a market exists for a market rate rental project of this type in light of Edinborough and other similar projects in the area. The developers have submitted a housing need assess- ment to support their view that such housing is needed. Staff feels additional research is needed to verify the feasibility of this project. Second, is concern that the developers have paid a premium for the site which should not now be under- written by the City. The value of this site must also be carefully analyzed prior to City participation in the project. Mr. Hughes asked that the Council review this preliminary proposal and provide direction as to financial involvement in this project, particularly as it relates to the issuance of Housing Revenue Bonds. Mr. Hughes introduced Bob Johnson, President of Johnson Building Company and Stuart Nolan, of the Stuart Corporation. Mr. Johnson summarized that they have gone through two different condominium proposals for the site and have expended a lot of time, money and energy without results and therefore are proposing this concept which may be the best proposal of all. He noted that condominiums in the metropolitan area basically have a zero absorption rate, that no units have been sold since last August when their second proposal was approved, and that as a result lenders are not looking favorably on condominiums and have stopped lending on such projects. He noted that he had been approached by a number of persons on the concept of doing an elderly housing project because the site would be ideal. In support thereof, Mr. Johnson advised that they have had a preli- minary assessment of housing needs for the elderly in Edina prepared and have joined with Stuart Corporation who are experienced in development and management of elderly housing projects. Mr. Nolan, Stuart Corporation, reiterated that the site would be ideal for the proposed elderly housing project. He stated that during the last five and six years very little market rate housing has been-con- structed in the metropolitan area as developers were interested in construction of apartments. However, once Section 8 funds have been withdrawn by the federal government there has been almost no new apartment construction starts. From past experience, he stated he knew of no other way to get a project such as this going without the tax exempt financing by issuance of Housing Revenue Bonds. With regard to land write -down, Mr. Nolan stated that the price paid for the land by Johnson Building Company was predicated on a commercial purpose. The present taxes on the land are in the $30,000 range. The project proposed is for a 152 -unit apartment building which would yield taxes of approximately $150,000. He noted further that the 152 units as proposed would fit within the general scope and size of the building proposed prior. Member Turner pointed out that on the issue of Housing Revenue Bonds, the Council gave concept approval for Edinborough on the basis that the total project will achieve several of the goals in the Comprehensive Plan having to do not only with elderly housing but some modest cost ownership opportunities, some transportation issues, etc. Out- side of the Fairview - Southdale Hospital bonds, Member Turner pointed out that the Council has not approved tax exempt financing and have looked for a clear public purpose in doing such. Planner Larsen advised that the goal in the Comprehensive Plan when adopted was for 350 new construction elderly units under Section 8 funding and that the Plan showed this as one of the locations that would be appropriate for elderly housing. In this proposed project, the units are primarily market rate units with a percentage of those units being proposed to be reserved under the Section 8 guidelines. Mr. Nolan commented that he understood the City desired to provide housing alternatives for its senior citizens in hopes that some would move from their homes thereby recycling them,to families.and that the proposed project would provide that alternative. He added that Congress also questione& the wisdom of tax exempt financing and during this past year they acted on the issue and severely limited it for com- mercial and industrial uses but preserved tax exempt financing for rental apartments without limitation. Mr. Rosland pointed out that other projects were under consideration to capture the tax increment in that district for other public benefits.and that staff had some concern for those probable commitments. Member Schmidt commented that the proposed elderly housing project may draw . people from the northerly part of the City as well as from Hopkins who may buy into the project. Member Bredesen submitted that in addition to his qualms about public subsidy going to a project of which only 20% of the units would be reserved for people of low and moderate income, he was concerned about the number of units proposed and the.additional traffic it would create in the area and would therefore be reluctant to move ahead with the proposal. In response, Mr. Johnson submitted that in Edina there is no choice of housing for . people in certain income levels, noting that there is an 8 -year waiting list at 7500 York Avenue and that there would be public.purpose served when people are presently displeased with the housing opportunities that are offered now. He added that he felt an elderly housing project would have the lowest traffic impact of any possible use for the site. Member Turner stated that although she would like to see a housing project on the site and has supported all 12/17/85 efforts on elderly housing in Edina, she was reluctant to support approval of another tax exempt financing.project until we could see how Edinborough goes and further, that she was concerned about the cost of the site and for those reasons could not support the proposed project. Member Richards stated he too had serious concerns about tax increment financing, and that the proposal may be worthwhile to consider but that he was not ready to support it at this time. Member Bredesen commented that if the developers proceed on the proposed concept they do so with the risk that he could not support it but would be interested in seeing more about the project. Member Schmidt abstained from commenting. Mayor Courtney submitted that he felt it was an ideal plan for the site although he recognized there is hesitation on the method to be used for financing. He stated that we have not thought too much about people in Edina who could afford housing of this type and who would like to remain in Edina. Mayor Courtney added that we should have a chance to study the proposal a bit longer. Member Richards suggested that the developers come back in the middle of January with a straight market rate proposal through the Planning Commission process as he felt there are some points in the project to stimulate Council's thinking on the issues. Mr. Nolan stated that he would become uninvolved with the project at this point. No formal action was taken. PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON REVENUE SHARING FUNDS FOR 1985 ENTITLEMENT PERIOD 16. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Mr. Rosland advised that a public hearing was held on November 7, 1984, for the purpose of receiving written and oral comments from the public concerning the 1985 annual budget and the proposed use of revenue sharing funds. No comment was received at that time. Staff would recommend approval of the funds as speci- fied in the 1985 budget. No objections being heard, Member Schmidt offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING 1985 REVENUE SHARING ENTITLEMENT PERIOD 15 BUDGET BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that it does hereby approved the follow- ing budget for the 1985 Revenue Sharing Entitlement Period 16: REVENUES Source Amount Property Taxes $6,653,337 Sales Taxes 550,787 Service Charges /User Fees /Other 1,132,740 Licenses and Permits 397,600 Fines and Penalties 325,000 Income from Other Governments 304,905 Federal General Revenue Sharing 225,000 $9,589,369 EXPENDITURES Activity GRS Funds Other Funds Education -0- -0- Police $125,000 $2,345,963 $2,470,963 Fire 100,000 1,373,840 1,473,840 Roads /Transport /Public Works 2,676,246 2,676,246 Sewers /Sanitation 96,700 96,700 Libraries -0- -0- Parks /Recreation 1,156,959 1,156,959 Health /Hospitals 207,523 207,523 Social Services /Welfare 53,360 53,360 General Administration _. 922,693 922.693 Financial Administration /Debt Service 451,085 451,085 Reserve for Contingencies - 80,000 80,000 .$225,000 $9,364,369 $9,589,369 Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. AWARD OF BID FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF 1974 FORD PIRSCH L9000 PUMPER CONTD TO 1/7/85. As recommended by staff, Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Turner to continue the award of bid for reconstruction of 1974 Ford Pirsch L9000 to the meeting of January 7, 1985. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF December 11, 1984, APPROVED. Mr. Hoffman advised that in November a petition has been signed by residents of Arden Avenue requesting the installation of "STOP" signs at Country Club Road at Arden Avenue. Concerns of the residents as presented to the Traffic Safety Committee was the amount of traffic using the street as a shortcut, speeds, lack of defined right of way at the intersection, safety of small children and apparent reckless 12/17/84 driving by some individuals. The Committee took action that an original /desti- nation study be done on Arden and that the results be reported at the December meeting. Mr. Hoffman stated that a license plate survey was conducted in the area at three different times and he presented the results of the survey together with other major findings. Based on the findings of the survey, the Committee at its December 11 meeting recommended denial of the request. It also recommended that - informing the broader neighborhood of the local problem might be a benefit that could be accomplished by the mailing or distribution of a flyer. Mr. Hoff- man stated that a resident at 4637 Arden Avenue had phoned today stating he was opposed to the "STOP" sign. Speaking in. support of the request for installation of "STOP" signs were: Kathleen Sanberg, 4617 Arden Avenue; Randy and Karen Jones, 4616 Arden Avenue, and Jeff Keys, 4646 Arden Avenue. The main concern expressed was the excessive speed by vehicles on Arden Avenue. Following lengthy discussion regarding the issues, Mr. Hoffman stated that traffic safety is comprised of three processes: 1) education, 2) enforcement, and 3) engineering and that the educational process has worked in other areas of the City when traffic problems arose. Member Turner suggested that we make an attempt to educate the 60 -70% of the drivers who use Arden Avenue by means of a mailed notice identifying the problem and if that does not work then to consider other solutions. Mr. Rosland said that the notices would be sent and then a speed survey would be made after the mailing to see if there is a reduction of speed. He assured the residents that staff would continue to work with them towards a solution. Motion of Member Bredesen was then seconded by Member Schmidt to approve the following recommended action as listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of December 11, 1984: 1) Installation of "NO U- TURN" sign for southbound Valley View Road at approxi- mately West 65th Street cross -over, and to acknowledge Sections B and C. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST AGREEMENT RESOLUTION ADOPTED. Mr. Rosland advised that upon adoption of the International City Management Association (ICMA) deferred compensation plan in 1976 or 1977 by the City, approximately three or four employees enrolled in the plan. Subsequently,.the State of Minnesota approved additional deferred compensation plans which have been actively marketed with City employees. There are presently no active members on the ICMA Plan. However, there is at least one current employee that does have funds in the Plan and therefore it is recommended that a resolution be adopted which would allow the City of Edina to enter into the new trust agreement established by ICMA Retire- ment Corporation, with the only difference between the prior arrangement and the arrangement requested by the resolution is establishment of a Board of Trustees to oversee the operation of the funds. Upon adoption of the resolution, participants will be able to select members for the Board. Member Richards introduced the following resolution, moving adoption: ..RESOLUTION OF.CITY OF EDINA, MN WHEREAS, the City of Edina, Minnesota, (the "Employer ") maintains a deferred compensation plan for its employees which is administered by the ICMA Retirement Corporation (the "Administrator "); and WHEREAS, other public employers have joined together to establish the ICMA Retire- ment Trust for the purpose of representing the interests of the participating employers with respect to the collective investment of funds held under their deferred compensation plans; and WHEREAS, said Trust is a salutary development which further advances the quality of administration for plans administered by the ICMA Retirement Corporation; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Employer hereby executes the ICMA Retirement Trust, attached hereto; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager shall be the coordinator for this program and shall receive necessary reports, notices, etc. from the ICMA Retire- ment Corporation as Administrator, and shall cast, on behalf of the Employer, any required votes under the program. Administrative duties to carry out the plan may be assigned to the appropriate departments. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING CONTRACT FOR 1985 DISCUSSED; CONTINUED.. Mr.. Rosland advised that the proposed agreement for Public Health Nursing Services for 1985 whereby the Bloomington Division of Public Health has agreed to provide the service to Edina residents at a cost of $78,560.00 has been reviewed by staff. This is $740.00 less than the 1984 contract due to the $5,000 reduction in funding. He noted that at this time it is not known which service areas will be reduced to offset the reduced funding. Member Bredesen suggested that the staff contact the Bloomington Division of Public Health regarding possible service areas that 12/17/84 may be reduced and to bring that information back to the Council before the contract is approved. Mr. Rosland stated that staff would follow through on the request. No action was taken. HEARING DATE SET FOR FRANCE AVENUE PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVAL & VARIANCE REQUEST. Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Schmidt, setting January 7, 1985, as the public hearing date for the France Avenue Preliminary Plan Approval and Variance Request for improvement of the street. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY BOARD APPOINTMENTS DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland recalled that in September the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners had approved a Structure and Compositon Plan for a Hennepin County Community Action Agency to serve suburban and rural Hennepin County as the vehicle to access funding for services to County residents. He noted that the Edina City Council has submitted a resolution to the County Board recommending that the Suburban Human Services Councils be designated at the Community Action Agency. The Board is now in the process of recruitment and selection of the initial Board of Directors which will consist of nine public officials (three Hennepin County Commissioners and six elected suburban officials), nine representatives from the private sector, and nine members of the low- income population and has asked that suburban council members consider applying for these positions. Following discussion that Edina should make a nomination to the Board, Mayor Courtney-stated he would be willing to have his name placed in nomination. It was informally agreed by the Council that Mayor Courtney be nominated. Mr. Rosland stated he would make contacts in support of Mayor Courtney's nomination. No formal action taken. APPOINTMENT OF BARBARA REYNOLDS TO COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORTED. Mr. Rosland reported that Barbara Reynolds, Chairman of the Edina Advisory Health Board, has been appointed to the Hennepin County Community Health Services Committee, following nomination by the Third District Nursing Association. REVISION OF FINDINGS OF FACT /VICTORSEN'S VALLEY VIEW 2ND ADDITION APPROVED. Mr. Hughes recalled that at its meeting of December 3, 1984, the Council had denied the preliminary plat of Victorsen's Valley View 2nd Addition, based on the Findings, Decisions and Reasons prepared by staff. He commented that two. minor changes to the document are recommended which.should have been noted on December 3 and presented the changes to the Council. Member Bredesen moved approval of the following changes to the Findings, Decisions and Reasons regarding Victorsen's Valley View 2nd Addition: 1) Revision of the introduction to show that Folke R. and Veown M. Victorsen, proponents, and Thomas H. Goodman, attorney for the proponents, were not present at the December 3, 1984, hearing. 2) The last sentence of paragraph 5. on page 4 should read, "No record exists that the Edina City Council approved the subdivision of the Subject Property, which resulted from the 1956 acquisition by Southdale Center, Inc. as required by Minnesota Statutes'and City Ordinances." Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Member-Richards noted that Mr. and Mrs. Victorsen were present and asked if they would speak.to the proposed Findings. Folke Victorsen replied, "No comment." Rollcall:. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. COUNCIL /EDINAMITE BENEFIT WINTER PARTY DATE SET. Member Turner announced that the date of Sunday, February 10, 1985, has been set for the Council hosted Edinamite Winter Party and asked the Council Members to mark their calendars. Detailed planning will take place after January 1. BREDESEN PARK DEVELOPMENT PROGRESS REPORT PRAISED. Member Turner stated she was very pleased with the progress report appreciated the effort in updating the on the development of Bredesen Park and Council Members on the project. NOMINEE FOR APPOINTMENT TO EDINA ADVISORY BOARD OF HEALTH NOTED. Member Richards submitted the name of Dr. Catherine Niewoidner for possible appointment to the Edina Advisory Board of Health when a vacancy occurs and asked that the name be kept on file by the Clerk's office. Member Turner commented that Barbara Reynolds, Chairman of the Advisory Board of Health, is hoping that a joint meeting of the Council and the Board can be scheduled in the near future. Mr. Rosland replied that he is working on a schedule of meetings for off - Monday nights and will work that into the roster. WOODDALE SCHOOL SITE HEARING PROCESS REVIEWED. Mr. Rosland reminded the Council of the proposed process regarding consideration of the Wooddale School Site. 11 /17/84 Two informational meetings for residents of the area and interested citizens will be conducted by the consulting firm of BRW on Tuesday, January 8 and January 15, 1985, at the Wooddale School building, beginning at 7 p.m. at which the consultants would present their report and recommendations for the Wooddale site. Notices of.the meetings will be sent to area residents and the Heritage Presentation Board. A public hearing then would.be scheduled for February 4, 1985, following publication and mailing lof notice as required, at which the public could be heard. Member Bredesen suggested that any visual aids such as graphics be used to help the public understand the recommendations of the consultants. No action was taken. REQUEST FOR AID IN PICK -UP /DISTRIBUTION OF SURPLUS FOOD DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland advised that a request has been made through Member Turner, from Colonial Church of Edina for assistance by City staff in picking up and distributing to drop -off points the monthly surplus food allotment for Edina residents. After brief discussion, it was decided to offer the assistance this time and bring back more details regarding the time involved, etc., and the role of South Hennepin Human Services Council in the program. No formal action taken. VARIOUS PETITIONS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REFERRED TO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FOR PROCESSING. Mr. Rosland advised that several petitions have been received for public improvements and recommended that they be referred to the Engineering Department for processing. Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Schmidt, to refer the following petitions to the Engineering Department for routine processing: 1) Petition for Permanent Street Surfacing and Curb - Valley View Road between Mark Terrace and McCauley Trail. 2) Petition for Sidewalk - West 492 Street between France Avenue and City Ramp. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. PETITION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PARKING LOT AT EDINA COMMUNITY CENTER REFERRED TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & PLANNING COMMISSION. Mr. Rosland advised that the School District has petitioned the City Council to.-enlarge parking lot areas at the Edina Community Center with the cost of the parking facilities to be paid for primarily by the Community Center. As was done previously, they have asked the City to absorb the cost of curb and gutter removal, fence and post removal, necessary clearing of the area, etc. in addition to assuming all engineering and clerical costs as service to the community. The City will also provide project supervision working with a school liaison contact. Mr. Rosland pointed out that the first step would be the processing -of a Conditional Use Permit through the Community Development and Planning Commission and public hearing process. Motion of Member Richards was seconded by Member Bredesen to refer the matter.to the Planning Commission to be considered at their January meeting and to be brought back to the Council for public hearing on a Conditional Use Permit in February. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. I DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE DIRECTOR TO SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY DESIGNATED. Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION DESIGNATINGIDIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE DIRECTOR TO SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of thejCity of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: J. N. Dalen is hereby designated to servelas a director of the Suburban Rate Authority, and John Wallin is hereby designated to serve as alternate director of the Suburban Rate Authority for the year 1985.and until their successors are appointed. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Schmidt. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. i I DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE TO LOGIS DESIGNATED. Member Bredesen offered the following resolution and moved its adoption:: RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE DIRECTOR TO!LOGIS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the!City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Kenneth E. Rosland is hereby designated'as Director of LOGIS and J. N. Dalen is hereby designated as.- Alternate Director of LOGIS for the year 1985 and until their successors are appointed. I Motion for adoption of the resolution was ;seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: l Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. 12/17/84 EDINA SUN - CURRENT DESIGNATED AS OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER FOR 1985. Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution, moving adoption: RESOLUTION DESIGNATING OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER FOR 1985 BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the Edina Sun - Current be and is hereby designated as the Official Newspaper for the City of-Edina for the year 1985. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Richards. Rollcall: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. RESOLUTION ADOPTED FOR ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS /EDINBOROUGH. Attorney Erickson explained that it is recommended that the Council adopt a resolution relating to the issuance of revenue bonds for the proposed Edinborough project and giving preliminary approval to the development. There are rumors about new legislation being proposed which might make these bonds unuseable and that adoption of the resolution would protect the option for the City if they wish to issue revenue bonds. He pointed out that the City will retain the right to withdraw from participation and to not issue the bonds if they so determine. No comment being heard, Member Richards introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 462C, MINNESOTA STATUTES, FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE DEVELOPMENT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City) as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. By the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended (the "Act "), the City is authorized to plan, administer, issue and sell revenue bonds or obligations to make or purchase loans to finance one or more multifamily housing developments within its boundaries which revenue bonds or obligations shall be payable solely from the revenues of the development or other security pledged therefor. 1.02. Representatives of Partners for Senior Communities, Inc., an Illinois corporation (the "Corporation "), have advised this Council of its desire to form a Minnesota limited partnership in which the Corporation or one or more of its principals will be general partners (the "Developer "), to acquire one or more parcels of land located within the geographical limits of the City in the southernmost portion of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan Area to construct and equip thereon a multifamily rental apartment building containing approximately 203 units, together with parking and related and subordinate tacilities (the "Development "). The Development is intended primarily for occupancy by elderly persons. Total development and financing costs are presently estimated by the Corporation to be approximately $17,000,000. 1.03. The Corporation has requested that the City issue its revenue bonds in one or more series (the "Bonds ") pursuant to the authority of the Act in such aggregate principal amount as may be necessary to finance all or a portion of the costs of the Development and make the proceeds of the Bonds available to the Developer, directly or indirectly, for the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Development, subject to agreement by the Developer or other entity to pay promptly the principal of and interest on the Bonds. 1.04. The City has been advised by representatives of the Corporation that conventional commercial financing is available to pay the capital costs of the Development only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the scope of the Development and the economic feasibility of operating the Development would be significantly affected, but with the aid of municipal financing the Development can be constructed as designed and its operation can be made more economically feasible. 1.05. The full faith and credit of the City will not be pledged to or for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds. Section 2. Approvals and Authorization. 2.01. It is hereby found and determined that it would be in the best interest of the City to issue the Bonds under the provisions of the Act in an amount currently estimated to be approximately $17,000,000 to finance all or a portion of the cost of the Development. 2.02. The Project is hereby given preliminary approval by the City and the issuance of the Bonds for such purpose approved. The Bonds shall not be issued until a multifamily housing program prepared pursuant to the requirements of Subdivision 5 of Section 462C of the Act (the "Program ") has been reviewed and approved as provided by the Act, until the other requirements of the Act have been satisfied, until the requirements of Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended (the "Code "), necessary in order to assure the tax - exempt of the interest hereon, have been satisfied, and until the City, the Developer and the purchaser or purchasers of-the Bonds have agreed upon the details of the Bonds and the provisions for their payment. The principal of, 12/17/84 premium, if any, and interest on each Bond, when, as and if issued, shall be payable solely from the revenues of the Development and other security or property pledged to the payment thereof and shall not constitute a debt of the City. 2.03. The Corporation has agreed to pay directly or through the City any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the Development whether or not the Program is.prepared or approved by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency; whether or not the Development is carried to completion; and whether or not the Bonds are issued. 2.04. The City retains the right, in its sole discretion, to withdraw from participation and, accordingly, not issue the Bonds should the City at any time prior to the issuance thereof determine that it is in the best interest of the City not to issue the Bonds. 1 2.05. This Resolution is intended to, and shall, constitute a "bond resolution" or "some other official action" with respect to the Bonds and the Development under, and within the meaning of, Section 1.103 -8(a) of the Treasury Regulations under the Code. Passed and adopted by the City Counc!il of the City of Edina, Minnesota this 17th day of December, 1984. Attest: I Mayor City Clerk Motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member Turner. l Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Resolution passed and adopted. j REPORT GIVEN ON PROPOSAL FOR METROVAL /SPEED SKATING TRACK. Mr. Rosland reported that the consultants to the Open Space Commission of the Metropolitan Council have given their report regarding the three proposals submitted by Edina, Rose- ville and Burnsville for construction ofja speed skating tract in their respective communities. The consultants' report, based on an aggregate point system, showed .the-Roseville site as number one, the Edina site as number two, and the Burnsville site as number three. A hearing process will now be followed by the Open Space Commission and the Metropolitan Council. No action taken. CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Schmidt was seconded by Member Turner for payment of the following claims as per Pre -List dated 12/17/84: General Fund $195,695.29, Park Fund $49,033.19, Art Center $5,398.81, Swimming Pool Fund $1,427.72, Golf Course Fund $3,965.95, Recreation Center Fund $17,083.36, Gun Range Fund $339.41, Waterwork Fund $900,399.34, Sewer Rental Fund $162,349.21, Liquor Dispensary Fund $542,511.72, Construction Fund $44,695.781, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $2,845,911.98, Total $4,768,811.76, and for confirmationjof the following claims dated 11/30/84: General Fund $91,128.84; Park Fund $155.10., Art Center.$181.99, Golf Course Fund $55,670.64, Recreation Center Fund $1,637'.27, Gun Range Fund $153.99, Waterwork Fund $576.08, Liquor Dispensary Fund $422,178.51, Total $571,682.42. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. I There being no further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m. City Clerk MINUTES SPECIAL YEAR -END MEETING EDINA CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 28, 1984 Mayor Courtney called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. Answering rollcall were Members Richards, Schmidt, Turner and Mayor Courtney. Member Bredesen arrieced at 5:10 p.m. PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING CONTRACT FOR 1985 APPROVED. Mr. Rosland recalled that at the Council Meeting of December 17, 1984, the Council had reviewed the agreement for public health nursing services which the Bloomington Division of Public Health had agreed to provide to Edina residents at a cost of $78,560.00 for 1985. This amount is $740.00 less than the 1984 contract due to the $5,000 reduction in funding. Because the Bloomington Division of Public Health had not identified the service areas which will be reduced to offset the reduced funding, the Council had directed the staff to contact Bloomington and to bring back that information to the Council. Mr. Rosland stated that Bloomington has been contacted and they have indicated that there will be no specific elimination of any category of service which they are presently providing and that they will always specifically treat remedial cases referred to them by the various hospitals. Services presently provided by the Bloomington Division of Public Health are: Home Health Services, Community Nursing Services, Disease Prevention and Control Services, Health Education (partially funded by United Way) and Maternal and Child Health Service. The dollar cutback in the Edina contract has resulted in Bloomington reducing its marketing efforts of its health prevention programs. This reduction in marking efforts has resulted in a reduction in demand for those services and thus Blooming- ton has been able to keep the Edina component of the contract in line with the monies provided. Bloomington has advised that with the further reduced contract in 1985, there will be a continued lack of promotion of prevention efforts in order to have sufficient money to take care of the remedial, part -pay and no -pay patients. Barbara Reynolds, chairman of the Edina Advisory'Board of Health was present and spoke in support of the recommendation that the public health nursing contract for 1985 with the Bloomington Division of Public Health be approved. Following discussion, Member Turner moved approval of the 1985 Public Health Nursing Contract to the Bloomington Division of Public Health at $78,560.00. Motion was seconded by Member Schmidt. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. VARIOUS MEETING DATES NOTED BY CITY MANAGER. Mr. Rosland informed the Council Members of the following meeting dates: 1) Meeting.with Commissioner Randy Johnson and Commissioner -elect John Keefe regarding Hennepin County's 1985 Legislative Program - January 2 or January 7; 2) Municipal Legislative Commission Board of Directors Meeting and Legislative Delegation Reception - January 24; 3) LMC Legislative Conference - January 29. 4) Wooddale School Site Informational Meetings - January 8 and January 15. He also indicated that the Wooddale Site issue would probably be on the Council Agenda on February 4, and that the Second Reading of the rezoning for Edinborough and preliminary plan approval, the draft Wine Licensing Ordinance and the LMC Legislative Policies will probably be on the Council Agenda on January 21. No action was taken. STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES AND RECOMMENDED TRANSFERS APPROVED. As recommended by Mr. Dalen, Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Schmidt for approval of "Statement of Estimated Expensitures and Recommended Transfers for Year Ended December 31, 1984 ". Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Coutney Motion carried. CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Bredesen for payment of the following claims as per Pre -List dated 12/28/84: General Fund $108,279.68, Park Fund $27,863.78, Art Center $2,529.91, Swimming Pool Fund $378.14, Golf Course Fund $3,426.70, Recreation Center Fund $1,518.69, Gun Range Fund $46.98, Waterworks Fund $12,833.37, Sewer Rental Fund $3,782.89, Liquor Dispensary Fund $34,116.59, Construction Fund $3.75.00, Total $195,151.73. There being further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting adjourned at 5:25 p.m. t City Clerk S A� LOCATION MAP E61 REZONING & SUBDIVISION NUMBER Z -84 -3 and S -84 -14 Opus /Normandale Colf Course Camelot West L O C A T 10 N Generally (coated north of West 77th Street and East of T.H. 100 REQUEST R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to POD -2 Planned Office District EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT Z -84 -3 Opus Corportion /Normandale Golf Course 5 -84 -14 Camelot West. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit ^r $� District to POD -2, Planned Office District Mr. Gordon Hughes reminded the Commission that this item had been continued from the November 28, 1984, meeting in order for the Commissioners to view a golf course plan prepared for the City. He presented the plan and illustrated the location of the proposed office building. He noted that this plan had been approved by the Park and Recreation Department; Kenneth Rosland, City Manager and John Vallerie, Manager of Braemar Golf Course. Mr. Bob Worthington, Opus Corporation, was present to answer any questions. Mr. Dave Cooper, 4521 Sedum Lane, presented a petition signed by 130 of the neighbors opposing the rezoning. He stated that it was contrary to the South Edina Plan and the Comprehensive Plan., Mr. Bill Sexton, 4901 Poppy Lane, presented pictures taken from Fred Allen's property, 7453 West Shore Drive, of the golf course to emphasize the impact a five - story building would have on the neighbors. He said that he had spoken with Warren Hyde, former City Manager and George Hite, former Planning Director. They believed that the subject land would always remain golf course. He presented a letter from Mr. Hite stating so. Mr. Helge Thomsen, 4705 Hibiscus Ave. S., stated that he had attended those meetings when the area south of Lake Edina Addition was being developed. At that time Pentagon Park called for five stories which was two stories above the then existing code. Due to much controversy, a compromise was established between the neighbors and Mr. Rauenhorst. The neighbors were guaranteed that the golf course would remain permanently as a buffer and the five -story Pentagon Park building was agreed upon. Mr. David Byron, 7433 West Shore Dr., presented 30 additional signatures to the petition opposing the rezoning. Mr. Byron commented that the November 28th Staff Report was pro - developer and that parcel of land proposed for rezoning was described as the southerly 6.5 acres. This description was misleading. He further commented that Staff stated they found no documentation of the agreement with the City to permanently retain the golf course with the City. He believed documentation existed. Mr. Byron told the Commission that Mr. Rauenhorst was unable to develop the industrial park until the City adopted an industrial ordinance. The permanently guaranteed golf course buffer was used to sell this project to the City and the active neighborhood committees who were involved at that time. Mr. Byron based his opinion on documentation and research of.records on file in the Planning Department files. He stated that the Edina Zoning ordinance lists 13 specific objectives, not one of which would be met if this rezoning proposal wes to be granted. At least half of them would be met if the rezoning was denied. These are the guidelines which should be followed. Mr. Fred Allen, 7453 W. Shore Drive, believed that the golf course plans presented were misleading because they were out of scale. He pointed out that trees would have to be cut down for this development and a five -story building would be totally out of proportion. The proposed location of the parking lot is illogical and undesirable. Roger Peterson, 7505/07 W. Shore Drive, purchased his property in 1970. He inquired of the status of the golf course before purchasing his property and was told it would remain open space. Z -84 -3 Opus /Normandale Golf Inc. and S -84 -14 Camelot West. R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to POD- 2,.Planned Office District Generally located: North of West 77th Street and East of T A4 T.H. 100 1 Mr. Gordon Hughes reported that the subject property measures 27.5 acres in area and is zoned R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. The property is the present site of Normandale Golf Course which is a nine hole, par 27 executive course. The golf course is served by an existing A -frame pro shop /ticket office and a parking lot which is accessed from West 77th Street. The subject property is designated "quasi- public" by the Edina Comprehensive Plan. Adjoining the rezoned parcel to the west and east are developed properties which are zoned POD -1. Across the street to the south are properties zoned PID and POD -2. Adjoining the northerly edge of the golf course are developed R -1 lots and adjoining the east boundary of the golf course is Lake Edina Park. The applicants request a rezoning of the southerly 6.75 acres of the property to POD -2, Planned Office District. A preliminary development plan has been submitted which shows a five -story 106,600 square foot office building for the rezoned parcel. All parking will be located between the proposed building and West 77:th Street. The proposed building location maintains a distance of about 290 feet, at the closest point, from the rear lot lines of the single family lots which border the north edge of the golf course. Mr. Hughes stated that according to City records, the office /industrial land in the vicinity of the subject property was rezoned in 1962. The City Council minutes documenting this rezoning note concern expressed by some residents and Council members regarding future development of the golf course. Although the minutes indicate a discussion concerning deed restrictions or protective covenants to prohibit future development of the golf course, no such restrictions were then imposed and, to the City's knowledge, no restrictions now exist which affect the development of the golf course other than normal zoning and development controls. Although they are unsure if the balance of the site will continue to be operated as a golf course, the applicants are willing to impose a deed restriction or similar covenant insuring that no further development occurs. Mr.Hughes noted that the City of Edina may be interested in acquiring the balance of the property and operating the golf course. Mr. Hughes said that from a land use standpoint, the proposed development of the southerly portion of the site for office purposes and the retention of the balance of the site as a golf course /open space /buffer represents a reasonable use of the property which is in keeping with surrounding developments. However, the proposed five -story building is somewhat taller than surrounding developments and therefore, a rezoning to POD -1 which has a four- story height limit may be more appropriate for the subject property. The building should be relocated southerly to provide a more generous spacing from the homes to the north. The desire to take advantage of the views afforded by the golf course is understandable. Staff believes that the amenity value of the course could still be realized if the building were moved 100 feet southerly. With these comments, Mr. Hughes suggested that preliminary approval should be granted subject to: 1. Platting of the property. 2. Conservation Restriction covering the area not rezoned. 3. Acceptable final development plans. He introduced Mr. Bob Worthington, Executive Director of Government Affairs for Opus Corporation. Mr. Worthington presented air photos and explained that construction would not begin for perhaps two years until the need for office space increases. Mr. Worthington said that a portion of the building would be used for a clubhouse for the golf course and that there would be an easement on the balance of the property to insure the open space remains. Mr. Worthington and Mr.Hughes mentioned that the City had expressed an interest in the golf course although funds for such an expense were not available at this time. A donation to the City of this portion of the property is a possibility also. Mr. Lewis asked Mr. Worthington to comment on the recommendation of a zone change to POD -1 instead of POD -2. Mr. Worthington stated that Opus Corporation was most interested in constructing a five -story office building. He added that it could be changed if the Planning Commission felt it was necessary. Mr. Del Johnson stated that he agreed that the office building would be located too far to the north on the site. Mr. Worthington reported that the purpose of the northerly location was for energy efficiency. The angle of the building would make better use of the sun rays. The building would be better located to the north for participation in the golf course as a clubhouse. Mr. Worthington believes that the residents to the north do not received such a full view of the building because it would be angled and this would be more beneficial to them. Opus feels that the building situated to the north creates the best parking lot conditions. Although Opus prefers the northerly location, they would agree to Staff recommendations. Mr. Gordon Johnson asked if the parking was adequate for both office and golf use. Mr. Worthington stated that the parking was sufficient. Staff was statisfied with the parking. Mr. Runyan wondered how much land would be acquired by moving the building away from the residential homes. Mr. Worthington explained that an additional 50 to 75 feet would separate the building from the nearest residential home. Heavy berming would shield the parking from the neighbors. Mrs. McClelland was more in favor of removing a story from the building rather than moving the building. Mr. Fred Allen, 7453 West Shore Drive, stated that office space was not needed in this area and that a five- story building was completely out of proportion. The northerly location of the building would significantly shorten the length of the golf course, and would hinder the wildlife that has been established there. Mr. Allen stated that the golf course simply needed to be maintained better in order to beneficial. He argued that the neighbors had been promised that the golf course would be a permanent buffer between the office area and the residential area. David Byron, 7433 West Shore Drive, pointed out that his property abutted the golf course. Mr. Byron stated that more neighbors would have attended the meeting if they had been aware of it. He accussed Opus of using a five- story building as "leverage" and that the neighbors were not only opposed to a five- story building, but to any construction of an office building. Mr. Bryon stated his opposition tof the proposal for the following reasons: 11. This property was established as a buffer zone in 1962. It should remain as is. 2. It is strictly a convenience that Mr. Rauenhorst does not recall making a committment to the neighbors to preserve this buffer zone permanently. 3. The proposed useis not compatible with Edina's Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan suggests Public /Quasi Public Use. 4. Five stories is completely out of proportion for the neighborhood. 5. The building is located too far to the north. Security lights from the building will shine directly into the neighbors' yards and homes. 6. A restaurant plan was presented at the neighborhood meeting. Is this still in the picture? 7. No visual screening for the neighbors has been presented. 8. The neighbors would need a committment that if this proposal is granted, the remainder of the property would be a permanent buffer. Lee Seeber, 7437 West Shore Drive, pointed out that Mr. Worthington had stated that the golf course need has declined because of competition and therefore, the need for a office building was more financially desirable and then contradicted himself by saying at a later point that there was a demand for golf courses in the area. Mr. Seeber stated that he had spoken with the Park Board in hopes that Edina could take over Normandale Golf Course and bring it up to Braemar's standards. He was informed that at this time there were no funds. He suggested that Opus donate the land to Edina and was told that this was a possibility. Later he was informed of a neighborhood meeting at which the present proposal was discussed. He stated that the neighbors were unprepared and did not object at that time, however, now many neighbors opposed. David Sarver, 7421 West Shore Drive, stated that the wildlife would diminish and many trees would need to be eliminated. The trees are presently screening the view of other office buildings. He was opposed. Bill Sexton, 4901 Poppy Lane, stated that the prime reason for the lack of interested golfers is because of the poor maintenance of the property. An office building there would be a poor choice. Mr. Sexton asked how the neighbors could be informed of the public meetings. Mr. Hughes explained the procedure for rezoning. Joan Sexton, 4901 Poppy Lane, noted that the golf course was once a ski shop in the winter months and did well until the Rauenhorst children acquired it. Mr. Seeber suggested that the parking lot be relocated in order to move the office building to the south. Mr. Worthington explained that Opus was interested in including the building with the golf course. Mr. Worthington stated that Opus had previously held the proposal over from the Planning Commission meeting in order to give the neighbors ample time to comment to Opus Corporation or ask questions and they had received no response. He stated that Opus intended to legally bind itself with an easement stating that the remainder of the property would be permanent buffer. Mr. Gordon Johnson suggested that this proposal be held over to the next meeting in order to landscaping and golf course plans. Mrs. McClelland seconded the motion. All were in favor; the motion carried. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT NOVEMBER 28, 1984 Z -84 -3 Opus /Normandale Golf Inc. and 5 -84 -14 Camelot West. R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to POD -2, Planned Office District Refer to: Attached preliminary development plan and preliminary plat Generally located: North of West 77th Street and East of T.H. 100 The subject property measures 27.5 acres in area and is zoned R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. The property is present site of Normandale Golf Course which is a nine _e, par 27 executive course. The golf course is served by an existing A -frame pro shop /ticket office and a parking lot which is accessed from West 77th Street. The subject property is designated "quasi- public" by the Edina Comprehensive Plan. Adjoining the rezoned parcel to the west and east are developed properties which are zoned POD -1. Across the street to the south are properties zoned PID and pOD -2. Adjoining the northerly edge of the golf course are developed R -1 lots and adjoining the east boundary of the golf course is Lake Edina Park. The applicants request a rezoning of the southerly 6.75 acres of the property to POD -2, Planned Office District. A preliminary development plan has been submitted which shows a five -story 106,600 square foot office building for the rezoned parcel. This building is proposed to be located on the northerly extreme of the rezoned parcel presumably to take advantage of the views afforded by the remainder of the golf course. All parking will be located between the proposed building and West 77th Street. The proposed building location maintains a distance of about 290 feet, at the closest point, from the rear lot lines of the single family lots which border the north edge of,the golf course. cording to our records, the office /industrial land in the ..,cinity of the subject property was rezoned in 1962. The City Council minutes documenting this rezoning note concern expressed by some residents and Council members regarding future development of the golf course. Although the minutes indicate a discussion concerning deed restrictions or protective covenants to prohibit future development of the golf course, no such restrictions were then imposed and, to our knowledge, no restrictions now exist which affect the development of the golf course other than normal zoning and development controls. The applicants have stated that the office building now proposed represents full development of the entire 27.5 acre golf course site. Although they are unsure if the balance of the site will continue to be operated as a golf course, the applicants are willing to impose a deed restriction or similar covenant insuring that no further development occurs. If the golf course use continues, it is obvious that a reconfiguration of some of the holes is necessary. The attached plan prepared by Don Herfort, golf course architect, shows a possible reconfiguration if the proposed office building is constructed. It should be noted that Mr. Herfort was retained by the City of Edina which may be interested in acquiring the balance of the property and operating the golf course. The City has also requested Barr Engineering Co., our hydrologic consultants, to verify that the stormwater ponding needs of the area can be met if the proposed development occurs. Barr Engineering reports that the proposed development is feasible, from a stormwater management standpoint, provided that a relatively minor storm sewer extension is constructed. Recommendation From a land use standpoint, we believe that the proposed development of the southerly portion of the site for office purposes and the retention of the balance of the site as a golf course /open space /buffer represents a reasonable use of the property which is in keeping with surrounding developments. We are certain that some may testify that the developer promised in 1962 that the golf course would always remain undeveloped and, thus, the proposed rezoning should not be allowed. As noted earlier, Staff can't document that such a committment was made, either explicitally or implicitally, to the City. Some specific elements of the proposed plan deserve review. First, the proposed five -story building is somewhat taller than surrounding developments. The office building to the west is one story in height and the offices to the east are three stories. The Pentagon Office Building which is located south of West 77th Street and west of Computer Avenue is six stories, but maintains a greater separation from residential uses. Therefore, a rezoning to POD -1 which has a four story height limit may be more appropriate for the subject.property. As noted earlier, the proposed office building is located on the northerly portion of the rezoned parcel to take advantage of the golf course. Obviously, the building could be relocated southerly to provide a more generous spacing from the homes to the north. The desire to take advantage of the views afforded by the golf course is understandable. We believe that the amenity value of the course could still be realized if the building were moved 100 feet southerly. With these comments, we suggest that preliminary approval should be granted subject to: 1. Platting of the property. 2. Conservation Restriction covering the area not rezoned. 3. Acceptable final development plans. u y f '-,3 f PROJECT DATA BUILDING AREA u..1e1.1 Ir1 R000 10,000 r� M1 IN 110011 IO.OeO M1 Oro 11000 11,000 D. M1 O1O IL0O0 11.00011. M1 O11 ROOK IIv00O rO. M1 Tom IOO.O00 N M1 1 / 111111KI 11.000 N IL (11011001 ITOYY ORn AUTOMOBILE PARKING 001111 111 Y11O1YT Ir To— 111 SOUTHWEST ELEVATION zT I R a> mo oT a�o � 5 IL 0 r s i W F Y$ s 3 = F 1 a s fY N u December 28, 1984 Mr. William Sexton 4901 Poppy Lane Edina, MN 55435 Bill, My recollection of the Pentagon Park zoning and development plan approval includes a quid pro quo between the golf course set aside and the allowed office development pattern and density. The early 1960s was a period of difficult adjustment for Edina planners, officials and residents. Large scale office and industrial park proposals for the southern Edina areas east and west of T.H. 100 were viewed as essential to the establishment of a more diversified property tax base yet potentially detrimental to the residential areas to their north. A good deal of attention was paid to assuring vehi- cular separation between these residential and non - residential areas and to establishing the greatest degree of spatial .separation possible. The Normandale Golf Course became an integral part of the Pentagon Park plan as a means of achieving the spatial separation objective. My recollection is that among the incentives established for the office park developer in exchange for the golf course set aside, was the opportunity to utilize the land area represented by the golf course in establishing the allowable building floor area in the area zoned for office use. In the jargon of the city planners, this means that the FAR (floor area ratio) calculation in- cluded-the golf course acreage. Sincerely L 1* ....� George Hite GH:cr December 11, 1984 TO: Honorable C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor Edina City Council Edina Community Development & Planning Commission SUBJECT: Normandale (Camelot) Golf Course The undersigned neighbors of Normandale Golf Course are totally opposed to rezoning any part of Normandale Golf Course from its current zoning classification of Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1). This property has been zoned R -1 for many years as a buffer between the high quality residential neighborhood to the north and the Opus /Rauenhorst Normandale Center development of the 1960's to the south. Rezoning would be contrary to the first stated objective of Edina's Zoning Ordinance, to wit: "To maintain, protect and enhance single family detached dwelling neighborhoods as the dominant land use." Rezoning would also be contrary to Edina's 1980 Comprehensive Plan, and, its forerunner, the South Edina Plan. We urge a prompt denial of the pending Opus /Rauenhorst Petition For Zone Change. VV-A— +-1- -� V-�a Y Q•--r• 4- -1 1 1 i- 6 t� u, t,s � t J -1-`51 December 11, 1984 TO: Honorable C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor Edina City Council Edina Community Development & Planning Commission SUBJECT: Normandale (Camelot) Golf Course The undersigned neighbors of Normandale Golf-Course are totally opposed to rezoning any part of Normandale Golf Course from its current zoning classification of Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1). This property has been zoned R -1 for many years as a buffer between the high quality residential neighborhood to the.north and the Opus /Rauenhorst Normandale Center development of the 1960's to the south. Rezoning would be contrary to the first stated objective of Edina's Zoning Ordinance, to wit: "To maintain, protect . and enhance single family detached dwelling neighborhoods as the dominant land use." Rezoning would also be contrary to Edina's 1980 Comprehensive Plan, and, its forerunner, the South Edina Plan. We urge a prompt denial of the pending Opus /Rauenhorst Petition For Zone Change. 1. December 11, 1984 TO: Honorable C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor Edina City Council Edina Community Development & Planning Commission SUBJECT: Normandale (Camelot) Golf Course The undersigned neighbors of Normandale Golf Course are totally opposed to rezoning any part of Normandale Golf Course from its current zoning classification of Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1). This property has been zoned R -1 for many years as a buffer between the high quality residential neighborhood to the north and the Opus /Rauenhorst Normandale Center development of the 1960's to the south. Rezoning would be contrary to the first stated objective of Edina's Zoning Ordinance, to wit: "To maintain, protect and enhance single family detached dwelling neighborhoods as the dominant land use." Rezoning would also be contrary to Edina's 1980 Comprehensive Plan, and, its forerunner, the South Edina Plan. We urge a prompt denial of the pending Opus /Rauenhorst Petition For Zone Change. Name Address rz) 71� Z/- 7S- 6? MAN 15--o `7 q -1 >( �� it P4c o. Lon 3• December 11, 1984 TO: Honorable C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor Edina City Council Edina Community Development & Planning Commission SUBJECT: Normandale (Camelot) Golf Course The undersigned neighbors of Normandale Golf- Course are totally opposed to rezoning any part of Normandale Golf Course from its current zoning classification of Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1). This property has been zoned R -1 for many years as a buffer between the high quality residential neighborhood to the north and the Opus /Rauenhorst Normandale Center development of the 1960's to the south. Rezoning would be contrary to the first stated objective of Edina's Zoning Ordinance, to wit: "To maintain, protect and enhance single family detached dwelling neighborhoods as the dominant land use." Rezoning would also be contrary to Edina's 1980 Comprehensive Plan, and, its forerunner, the South Edina Plan. We urge a prompt denial of the pending Opus /Rauenhorst Petition For Zone Change. �JJr Name Address 1_�- December 11, 1984 TO: Honorable C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor Edina City Council Edina Community Development & Planning Commission SUBJECT: Normandale (Camelot) Golf Course The undersigned neighbors of Normandale Golf Course are totally opposed to rezoning any part of Normandale Golf Course from its current zoning classification of Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1). This property has been zoned R -1 for many years as a buffer between the high quality residential neighborhood to the north and the Opus /Rauenhorst Normandale Center development of the 1960's to the south. Rezoning would be contrary to the first stated objective of Edina's Zoning Ordinance, to wit: "To maintain, protect and enhance single family detached dwelling neighborhoods as the dominant land use." Rezoning would also be contrary to Edina's 1980 Comprehensive Plan, and, its forerunner, the South Edina Plan. We urge a prompt denial of the pending Opus /Rauenhorst Petition For Zone Change. 9. December 11, 1984 TO: Honorable C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor Edina City Council Edina Community Development & Planning Commission SUBJECT: Normandale (Camelot) Golf Course The undersigned neighbors of Normandale Golf Course are totally opposed to rezoning any part of Normandale Golf Course from its current zoning classification of Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1). This property has been zoned R -1 for many years as a buffer between the high quality residential neighborhood to the north and the Opus /Rauenhorst Normandale Center development of the 1960's to the south. Rezoning would be contrary to the first stated objective of Edina's Zoning Ordinance, to wit: "To maintain, protect and enhance single family detached dwelling neighborhoods as the dominant land use." Rezoning would also be contrary to Edina's 1980 Comprehensive Plan, and, its forerunner, the South Edina Plan. We urge a prompt denial of the pending Opus /Rauenhorst Petition For Zone Change. �� G L; rol December 11, 1984 TO: Honorable C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor Edina City Council Edina Community Development & Planning Commission SUBJECT: Normandale (Camelot) Golf Course The undersigned neighbors of Normandale Golf-Course are totally opposed to rezoning any part of Normandale Golf Course from its current zoning classification of Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1). This property has been zoned R -1 for many years as a buffer between the high quality residential neighborhood to the north and the Opus /Rauenhorst Normandale Center development of the 1960's to the south. Rezoning would be contrary to the first stated objective of Edina's Zoning Ordinance, to wit: "To maintain, protect and enhance single family detached dwelling neighborhoods as the dominant land use." Rezoning would also be contrary to Edina's 1980 Comprehensive Plan, and, its forerunner, the South Edina Plan. We urge a prompt denial of the pending Opus /Rauenhorst Petition For Zone Change. Name Address !. December 11, 1984 TO: Honorable C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor Edina City Council Edina Community Development & Planning Commission SUBJECT: Normandale (Camelot) Golf Course The undersigned neighbors of Normandale Golf Course are totally opposed to rezoning any part of Normandale Golf Course from its current zoning classification of Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1). This property has been zoned R -1 for many years as a buffer between the high quality residential neighborhood to the north and the Opus /Rauenhorst Normandale Center development of the 1960's to the south. Rezoning would be contrary to the first stated objective of Edina's Zoning Ordinance, to wit: "To maintain, protect and enhance single family detached dwelling neighborhoods as the dominant land use." Rezoning would also be contrary to Edina's 1980 Comprehensive Plan, and, its forerunner, the South Edi -na Plan. We urge a prompt denial of the pending Opus /Rauenhorst Petition For Zone Change. Name Address i* WLur llggq I MAD "/ �ii� 0 ORW i • ( 1'V) , r-,-Y _ � A;-J t'-- — _ 4 n , .. LL 1 0 44, Y 173 :233 / Ai 7 TO: Honorable C. Wayne Courtney, Edina City Council Edina Community Development December 11, 1984 Mayor & Planning Commission SUBJECT: Normandale (Camelot) Golf Course The undersigned neighbors of Normandale Golf- Course are totally opposed to rezoning any part of Normandale Golf Course from its current zoning classification of Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1). This property has been zoned R -1 for many years as a buffer between the high quality residential neighborhood to the north and the Opus /Rauenhorst Normandale Center development of the 1960's to the south. Rezoning would be contrary to the first stated objective of Edina's Zoning Ordinance, to wit: "To maintain, protect and enhance single family detached dwelling neighborhoods as the dominant land use." Rezoning would also be contrary to Edina's 1980 Comprehensive Plan, and, its forerunner, the'South Edina Plan. We urge a prompt denial of the pending Opus /Rauenhorst Petition For Zone Change. Name Address 2f Ot t EL�� L I, December 11, 1984 TO: Honorable C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor Edina City Council Edina Community Development & Planning Commission SUBJECT: Normandale (Camelot) Golf Course The undersigned neighbors of Normandale Golf-Course are totally opposed to rezoning any part of Normandale Golf Course from its current zoning classification of Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1). This property has been zoned R -1 for many years as a buffer between the high quality residential neighborhood to the north and the Opus /Rauenhorst Normandale Center development of the 1960's to the south. Rezoning would be contrary to the first stated objective of Edina's Zoning Ordinance, to wit: "To maintain, protect and enhance single family detached dwelling neighborhoods as the dominant land use." Rezoning would also be contrary to Edina's 1980 Comprehensive Plan, and, its forerunner, the South Edina Plan. We urge a prompt denial of the pending Opus /Rauenhorst Petition For Zone Change. Name Address /V Se__,P�.- December 11, 1984 TO: Honorable C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor Edina City Council Edina Community Development & Planning Commission SUBJECT: Normandale (Camelot) Golf Course The undersigned neighbors of Normandale Golf- Course are totally opposed to rezoning any part of Normandale Golf Course from its current zoning classification of Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1). This property has been zoned R -1 for many years as a buffer between the high quality residential neighborhood to the north and the Opus /Rauenhorst Normandale Center development of the 1960's to the south. Rezoning would be contrary to the first stated objective of Edina's Zoning Ordinance, to wit: "To maintain, protect and enhance single family detached dwelling neighborhoods as the dominant land use." Rezoning would also be contrary to Edina's 1980 Comprehensive Plan, and, its forerunner, the South Edina Plan. We urge a prompt denial of the pending Opus /Rauenhorst Petition For Zone Change. Name n/7 Address December 11, 1984 TO: Honorable C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor Edina City Council Edina Community Development & Planning Commission SUBJECT: Normandale (Camelot) Golf Course The undersigned neighbors of Normandale Golf - Course are totally opposed to rezoning any part of Normandale Golf Course from its current zoning classification of Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1). This property has been zoned R -1 for many years as a buffer between the high quality residential neighborhood to the north and the Opus /Rauenhorst Normandale Center development of the 1960's to the south. Rezoning would be contrary to the first stated objective of Edina's Zoning Ordinance, to wit: "To maintain, protect and enhance single family detached dwelling neighborhoods as the dominant land use." Rezoning would also be contrary to Edina's 1980 Comprehensive Plan, and, its forerunner, the South Edina Plan. We urge a prompt denial of the pending Opus /Rauenhorst Petition For Zone Change. J ,qUe. L' A -ss.�v �S�Od ('Logo 1J2�� 2rZA-PX4E A 'Vol /3e r December 11, 1984 TO: Honorable C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor Edina City Council Edina Community Development & Planning Commission SUBJECT: Normandale (Camelot) Golf Course The undersigned neighbors of Normandale Golf Course are totally opposed to rezoning any part of Normandale Golf Course from its current zoning classification of Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1). This property has been zoned R -1 for many years as a buffer between the high quality residential neighborhood to the north and the Opus /Rauenhorst Normandale Center development of the 1960's to the south. Rezoning would be contrary to the first stated objective of Edina's Zoning Ordinance, to wit: "To maintain, protect and enhance single family detached dwelling neighborhoods as the dominant land use." Rezoning would also be contrary to Edina's 1980 Comprehensive Plan, and, its forerunner, the South Edina Plan. We urge a prompt denial of the pending Opus /Rauenhorst Petition For Zone Change. Name Address es) f 1I rscvs •�vE . h M r. :I t FtA , W 49 T H ITT HILLTOP , > f O 51 ST > CIT O W HALL 5 Pull: (A ® o POLICELH3 X ac , a� DEPT. < Y o F o r, J Y = o EDINA PUBLIC m WORKS CENTER W 52ND ST o - EDINA �l 1 y�^v RD 0 3 OUR LADY W OF GRACE; = CATHOLIC SCHOOL DENNOOR ST '•�� .'Kt ICH Op ro? a N RICHWC ID R1CHH v �, W1N0504 Av L4 < k I 1 ��L•• t',Fw O i NUMBER P -84 -3 Final Development Plan L O C A T 10 N 5203 Vernon Avenue REQUEST EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT III. NEW BUSINESS; Q� P -84 -3 Final Development Edina Family Care Clinic, Generally located east of Link Road Mr. Craig Larsen stated that zoned Planned Commercial District used as a medical office for thre Plan 5203 Vernon Avenue Vernon Avenue and North of the subject property is 2 (PCD -2) and is being a physicians. The owner's are requesting approval of a plan to construct an addition of approximately 1,100 square feet to the building. The addition includes a full basement zesulting in an addition of 2,200 square feet in floor area to the building. The main floor would be used primarily as office space with the basement area used for storage. Mr. Larsen reported the Zoning Ordinance now requires that medical clinics provide one space for each 200 square feet of gross floor area plus one space for each physician. This results in a requirement of twenty -two spaces for the existing use and eleven spaces for the proposed addition. The owners are proposing to lease seven spaces on adjacent property for a total of twenty -eight spaces, resulting in a need for a five parking space variance. The Zoning Ordinance allows the Commission and Council to consider variances as part of the Planned District review process. Mr. Larsen recommended approval of the proposed addition and also recommended granting a variance from the parking space requirement. The leased parking should be utilized by clinic staff since,it does not relate directly to existing parking on the site. A concern, however, is if additional physicians are added to the practice a parking problem would result. Mr. Larsen noted that support of the proposed variance is based upon the particular space needs of the existing clinic with its three physicians. Mr. Jack Barren, representative of Edina Family Care Clinic, assured the Commission that the expansion was for office space only and no additional physicians were anticipated. He presented a memorandum listing the use of the additional facility. Mr. Palmer moved for approval and Mr. Sked seconded the motion. All were in favor; the final development plans were approved. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 2, 1985 P -84 -3 Final Development Plan Edina Family Care Clinic, 5203 Vernon Avenue Generally located east of Vernon Avenue and North of Link Road Refer to: Attached Plans The subject property is zoned Planned Commercial District 2 (PCD -2) and is being used as a medical office for three physicians. The building was converted from a restaurant to its present use in 1981. The owner's are requesting approval of a plan to construct an addition of.approximately 1,100 square feet to the building. The addition includes a full basement resulting in an addition of 2,200 square feet in floor area to the building. The main floor would be used primarily as office space with the basement area used for storage. The proponent has stated that the addition is necessary to meet current needs of the clinic, and that it is not for the purpose of adding physicians to the practice. The twenty -one parking spaces currently provided exceeded the requirement of six spaces per physician under the provisions of the old zoning ordinance. The Zoning Ordinance now requires that medical clinics provide one space for.each 200 square feet of gross floor area plus one space for each physician. This results in a requirement of twenty -two spaces for the existing use and eleven spaces for the proposed addition. The owners are proposing to lease seven spaces on adjacent property for a total of twenty - eight spaces, resulting in a need for a five parking space variance. The Zoning Ordinance allows the Commission and Council to consider variances as part of the Planned District review process. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed addition and would also recommend granting a variance"from the parking space requirement. The leased parking spaces should handle additional parking demand created by the proposed addition, including additional support staff. The leased parking should be utilized by clinic staff since it does not relate directly to existing parking on the site. Staff is concerned, however, if additional physicians are added to the.practice a parking problem would result. Staff's support of the proposed variance is based upon the particular space needs of the existing clinic with its three physicians. Barron Construction, Inc. "BUILDERS AND REAL ESTATE INVESTORS" 7400 METRO BLVD., SUITE 140 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 612.835 -1001 °.r, ,-,DICAL PTM111, SFiVIC ".D by EDINIc RkMILY C.-.P—E CLINIC Medicpre Blue Cross - Blue Shield? Philsician's health Plan Med Center Health Plan Ist Hp l.th Plan Yi nnesota Health Net,•Tork 7-.7elfare R: Social Secrrity F=.. _ . 'C' . Yi nnes o +.a Barron Construction, "BUILDERS AND REAL ESTATE INVESTORS" THE CLINIC F_4S LOST: Inc. 7400 METRO BLVD., SUITE 140 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 612- 835 -1001 Dr. Beecher's office to Secretar: * /'4ec1ica2 ',n•ist Dr. Rhode's office to the commuter The lunchroom to the new fi li n,- r?mrs 3 secretarial stations to the filing ra*-ps Dr. Kafft's office to the Nurse ?rsct.i tioner REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: 'Mayor and City Council FROM: -Bob Kojetin, Park and Recreation Director VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: January 10, 1985 5-A Material Description (General Specifications): For services - for grading of land between Van Valkenburg Park and Grandview Cementary border - final grading Quotations /Bids: Company 1, Veit and Co. Inc. 14000 Veit P1. Rogers, MN 2. Buesing Bros. Trucking Long Lake, MN G.L. Contracting Inc. Hopkins, MN Department Recommendation: Veit and Co. Finance Director's Endorsement The recommended bid is �/ Amount of Quote or Bid $ 9,140.00 $ 9,400.00 $9,500.00 ti 'gn re Department : _ is not within the amount budget for the purchase. en, finance Director City nager's Endorsement: ' 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Gordon Hughes VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF IT EI IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: January 21, 1985 Material Description (General Specifications): 1985 Treatment for I ndianhead Lake Quotations /Bids: Company Amount of Quote or Bid l , Clean -Flo Laboratories, Inc. $5,481. 2. 3. Department Recommendation: Award to Clean -Flo 1,aboratoribs, Inc. (No other suppliers) " /J �1_ '"­- Planning Sianatu a Department Finance Director's Endorsement;;: The recommended bid is is not within the amount budget for the purchase. J. N. Dal en, Finance Director City M aaer's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: �� l � CLEAN -FLO LABORATORIES, INC. wa 4342 SHADY OAK ROAD HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 Gordon Hughes, City of Edina and December 17,1984 Indianhead Improvement, Inc. c/o Mr. Robert Perkins, President 6909 Dakota Trail Edina, MN 55435 Dear Property Owners and City Officials: This is in response to my conversation Friday with Bob Perkins, in which he indicated that the conconsensus of the people on the lake and the consultants is that the program should continue as it has in the past, and that the new equipment per our recommendation should not be installed. I have stated my opinion that the additional equipment could save you the annual Lake Cleanser and dye fees, but either program is fine with me, as we are seeing a continual improvement in the lake anyway. So our quotation for 1984 is as follows: ITEM DUE NOW TOTAL AMT Maintenance $ 421.00 4000 Lbs Lake Cleanser 1,253.33 Application of Lake Cleanser -- 18 gal lake dye 300.00 Application of dye -- Insurance 100.00 Total $2,074.33 $ 421.00 3,760.00 300.00 900.00 100.00 100.00 $5,481.00 You should pay $2,074.33 now, and the balance of $3,406.67 will be billed to you as it is installed. Please send in your permit application as soon as possible, so that we are not delayed at a bad time, when it is time to apply the materials. Thank you very much for placing your confidence in us. I am sure as time goes by, that you will more and more appreciate the wisdom of using our program. Very ,ruly yours, Robert L. Laing, President RLL /bj 612/935 -2137 To bring a take back to life ... You must first bring life back to the lake. 8nn/328- 66,91 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council ROM: Bob Kojetin, Director of Park and Recreation VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITDI IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: January 18,. 1985 Material Description (General Specifications): Replace roof on swimming pool bath house Quotations /Bids: Company 1. Keho Construction 2. Falls and Nyhusmoen Const. Department Recommendation: Amount of Quote or Bid $9,900.00 $16,779.00 Recommend award of roof replacement to Keho Const. Finance Director's Endorsement The recommended bid is ✓ is not Department within the amount budget for the purchase. J. N. Da en, Finance Director City ager's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of "^ " ^ —n--4--4. ________, the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: j MINUTES TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE JANUARY 15. 1985 9:00 A.M. Members present: Fran Hoffman, Chairman Gordon Hughes Alison Fuhr Craig Swanson Members absent: Lois Coon Others present: Capt. Leonard Kleven,-Edina Police ;Department Mr. Mark Bernhardson, Assistant City Manager SECTION A Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified, and the Council's authorization of recommended action. NONE. SECTION B Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request. 1. Request for "NO PARKING" signs along-West 56th Street in the area of Wooddale Avenue (Colony Park Baptist Church). Request made by Mr. John Clausen, area resident. ACTION TAKEN: The Committee reviewed the attached memorandum from Mr. Bernhardson and discussed its contents with him. Colony Park Church and members of the neighborhood met and discussed parking along West 56th Street near Wooddale Avenue. Resolved at the meeting was the recommendation that no further parking restrictions were needed while voluntary solutions to any problem would be sought and implemented. Additionally, the area's signing should be reviewed in six to nine months. Mr. Clausen, the requestor, was not present at the above meeting. Mr. Hughes moved denial of the request for additional parking restrictions. Mr. Swanson seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0. . 2. Request for the installation of a four -way "STOP" at the intersection of Tracy Avenue and Valley View Road. Request made by Mr. R.A. Rud, 6223 Westridge Boulevard. Traffic Safety Committee Minutes Page 2 January 15, 1985 ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Hoffman reported the results of a traffic count conducted on Tracy Avenue at Valley View Road. Warrants would be met for a "STOP" sign installation if 500 vehicles per hour entered the intersection for an eight -hour period. Findings indicate that this warrant is met for seven hours per day, but not the required eight hours. A memorandum from Fire Chief William Feck stated that a "STOP" sign on Tracy- Avenue may hinder fire vehicles from entering Tracy Avenue. Also, stopped vehicles on Tracy Avenue may cause fire vehicles to use oncoming traffic lanes to pass through the intersection. Capt. Kleven reported three vehicular accidents At the intersection since January 1, 1983. Additionally, he reported the greatest period of traffic backup, etc. at times when Colonial Church has major events scheduled. However, Colonial Church oftentimes hires off -duty Police Department employees to manage these traffic problems. Mrs. Fuhr described her view of the intersection and suggests its geometrics (wide roadways) contributes to confusion of drivers. Mr. Hoffman stated that the south ramp area was not counted, but generally would mirror the numbers of the north ramp. Mr. Swanson moved denial of the request based on lack of warrants. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0. Mrs. Fuhr moved that further investigation be conducted of similar ramps and the results be reported back to the Committee. Mr. Swanson seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0. SECTION C Requests which are deferred to a later date or are referred to others. 1. Mr. Hoffman updated the Committee on the status of signalization of West 78th Street at Cahill Road. The intersection does not currently meet warrants for signalization, however, increased development in the area may provide the basis for warrants in the near future. The conditions providing warrants are currently being reviewed and new criteria may be forthcoming. Hennepin County has the intersection scheduled for signalization in 1986 or 1987. Mr. Hoffman will continue his study of the area and maintain contact with the City of Bloomington on the matter. Mrs. Fuhr moved that Mr. Hoffman report changes to the Committee as they become known. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0. Respectfully submitted, Edina Traffic Safety Committee M E M-0 R A N D U M TO: Traffic Safety Committee FROM: Mark Bernhardson, Assistant City Manager"1,\ SUBJECT: 56TH STREET PARKING DATE: January 14, 1985 As noted in the attached letter, a meeting was held with Colony Park Baptist and the 56th Street residents on either side of Wooddale to discuss the parking situation. Residents at the meeting included six individuals from three households on 56th, one household abutting 56th east of Wooddale and two households abutting 56th west of Wooddale, together with the Pastor and Administrator from Colony Park Baptist. During the discussion, it was indicated that Sunday parking with Colony Park has not been a significant problem with the residents, particularly in relationship to the situation when it was Colonial Church. At present, in fact, only three or perhaps four persons are parking on 56th, and generally those are handicapped individuals for whom parking there gives better access to ramps into the Church. As for the identified concern on Monday evenings, there doesn't seem to be a significant problem for the residents or the City during good weather; however, in the winter time, it can become a problem with parking on both sides, as it is reduced to the extent that two cars cannot pass and often times people parking their cars will use the street as a sidewalk, and passenger /vehicular conflict is of concern. Additionally, at least in the winter time, there is difficulty for selected residents to back out onto 56th and also problems associated with parking too close to driveways and too close to the corners. As the significant problem is two hours on Monday evenings,__Colony Park, in an effort to be a good neighbor has indicated an extreme willingness to work towards a voluntary solution in working with the attendees of the class to have them park on only one side of the street when they come on Monday evenings, identify areas where they can also park on one side of the street which gives them similar walking distance to the Church back on Tower, etc. Additionally, the Church asked the residents to bring any concerns directly to them, including persons who park on.,both sides so that they can ask to have their cars removed. It appears at this juncture that the voluntary efforts on the part of both Colony Park and the residents to work together should eliminate the need -2- for a City- imposed solution. It is suggested, however, that in the future should this solution fail or other problems arise that Traffic Safety again review the problem and possibly look at the following solutions: a) Removal of the one -side parking on Sundays signs, as this has not been a problem since Colony Park has been there. b) Prohibiting one -sided parking on 56th on Monday nights only. Should you have any further comments or questions, I will be present at the meeting to respond. It is recommended that this memo, together with a copy of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes, be forwarded to the original requestor and the attending residents, including Colony Park Baptist Church. MB /sw Attachment Aric Lrtll)'� COLONY r PARK 5532 WOODDALE AVENUE • E • DINA, MINNESOTA 55424 612/920 -4767 January 11, 1985 Mr. Mark Bernhardson 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mark, The meeting last night went well from my perspective. Thank you for your sensitive concern and solid leadership. It is appreciated by those of us at Colony Park. Following the meeting, I visited with John Clausen in the parking lot. Very frankly, John feels that an imposed long term policy is needed, not a voluntary solution. Nevertheless, I indicated to John that I would be visiting with Mary Johnson, the administrator for Bible Study Fellowship, concerning our voluntary plan to re- position parked cars on West 56th Street. Last night l drove through 56th Street and noted the positioning of the driveways. I would like to suggest an alternative proposal. Let's have the Bible Study Fellowship ladies assign designated porkers for West 56th Street. First, they would allow a greater margin of safety near each driveway. Second, they are not to park across from any driveways. Third, that they clear out the stretch in front of Mr. Clausen's home at 4528. Fourth, that they park back from the corners so as to not crowd the openings of any of the streets. If you have any questions about this, Mark, please give me a call. Best wishes for a productive and enjoyable 1985. Warmly, Dennis N. Baker Senior Pastor Li I Honoring God by equipping people to disciple the nations. Washington Square Advisers PAUL D. JOHNSON VICE PRESIDENT - MORTGAGE LOAN 8 REAL ESTATE 612) 342.3632 January 16, 1985 City Clerk Y City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota RE: West 70th Street Traffic Safety Study Please have read into the minutes of the Edina City Council regularly scheduled meeting of January 21, 1985, the following letter: To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council of the City of Edina: Due to an out of town business commitment, I am unable to attend the City Council meeting of January 21, 1985. As a member of the Citizens Advisory Group for traffic safety on West 70th Street, appointed by you, I wish to comment as follows: f" � 1. I wish to thank the Mayor and City Council for appointing me to this Advisory Committee. It has been a pleasure and an education to serve in this capacity. 2. I have reviewed the draft of the final report which Mr. Peter A. Fausch will be presenting to you on Monday evening, January 21, 1985. As a member of the Advisory Committee, a member of the board of the Cornelia School PTA, and a resident of the 70th Street and Cornelia Drive neighborhood, I concur in the recommendations contained in the report and support it fully. 3. I would like to commend Mr. Fausch and his staff as well as the staff and employees of the City of Edina who were involved in the collection of data for this report. The work was thorough, well documented, and conducted in an expeditious manner. .4. Finally, I wish to thank the Mayor and City Council for commissioning this study and respectfully request that you accept the recommendations contained in the study and proceed in a timely manner to accomplish the work required by these recommendations. You s truly, Paul D. J nson- 7108 Glouchester Avenue ' Edina, MN 55435 CC: Peter A. Fausch, P.E. 512 NICOLLET MALL - BOX 9402 - MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55440 A Division of Washington Square Capital, Inc. T C ;; s� ti•,• S NEIDER y 1�I o ADD. 3, 3��,�i ) w 2g� T 0^ l� D I N A ��� 3 m 3Lao; �78 .� !i f c,A . 3 •\1')50 8850 !% 1:5 s0 mod• 30130 Cl' ���rtr� .t�R „e•,�r 20 's •s,. 'Lj ;.�s Bit *e as t5n7 :BGJ 'f� _ ;• Is _r3 d � � � '19.3' •; "�jy���; •�.� •°,.44 !. fit' i 2f•° : �1` 4 T m r" ` � of • i 330 o G = o r •'',J. s ° �F 3 I y� •r' � O t,3 n 0 %At ? A. S 100 1�S 100 Je f. Co .co loo Ioc.o5 9'• •,�,,•.' ..� ALT R _( i .I �'I 1 6 o N p , 3 � 4 _ • �0 £a t .co too 00 I !Y45 ` v • in ' + � (I. •- r 1 LARKSPURraa� 4:.16 U51 Q \•s �;. -2, C °J �i j° 77 !j ! r `'� Y �LAKE pINA ADD a, J11 'ro . 0 .:' y; 4 ` nif,f BOCK ON REPL Z `r0 ° da '113 t �� Grl�• Sr • 1 ti .' r •a 10 n r• I`fl n�••" <e a'f! a- r _t Vl i\�•1 `a 71J s •' s� AD 2 V °�w ASP ASIA N 1:..� ..':,t 11 •. fir' *�. •'' d� t• �J'f� . r0 �'• r , •+�l'E • of "'P d i 10 °dtisD �q° r ,*Bj,� r � , h�n •�f le e t � ' ) D ! °� I 1( �, ►c • N, l ` • \ s l y . L � h.r � wvp� , . i � : y, .• °y • t y �Cyt .: \ ./ li - ti S ' •- d � • � aO`0•:S(` IiC t � . i 'li I l ,.7 u , o F J�ro Mvfc* l - bo% ' o 20 di , 0 6 �' J�) w v } ._g.. N Io �, c . M . � � . i `. aJ t eJ rr: e o1L ' S 9 lo : l 9 w q�) o " f • SN Y o. ' 4 ;,) o , '- � k. a��. 1r{p1 ob�� i?1� o � S .,' , J e1 _ ", 1 `s 4 0' S 1`► { 0i e 1 !1 0 �`^4r ,• � y` { S e•R' � ', _ ., ` D� ! d4 �/ .6 ,4g �,4 1 �1 •F �' J 3 ° S' "I b 0' • - b " 1 � t .��•'�c�S y`, .1 D,[ o �S 1• ' �► 1•' S4 .� .' � . a� ; _ +_ �° o Z A o^ ' : : ' ► - r .v ,.'tf s • ,! C �� ••aR ' •• . ,< .� l t • 899 " 7 N, lI (` 5 L � � I ' ' •�. o . a •i �tt - :\ � R � i • o 1` 2 15. . ! S 56 'v •1 8 ' :oZ ^`�� + r ' , � '�i� a'^ lc . . '( ` _r' >� G•/ ,O O ,'} � .\ 6 - 7"4 4� fi. * 6 �� ,_ \ ` \t 1; O� � . 'e • . L-_�o j 1! a , 0 � !ojt�. wes Z 3 IO p:5• °5 " ' ; 2S 6 d 76 7. 1 ) 1 t` ' .19 S s � 0t� we 03RJ , S ° •' 4 / 01.11 Dl c� 1166 65 ift 4 � 100 : 0 Wesf v . 2 5 12 a `30 13 30 I.-N, 130 sto !1] Z 22 i` s 9 I 0 j t. J"S1)T i„%l � � (C :20 t 0 ! N 2t 04 09 t' 20 o5I : • t r Inp• �(° [t:`°.. „rL lj M�? n �1 �J 13 1 i5'r•M ,;c,)tile•- to^t�- •�'.. ;r Rei Ze, o. i ` ��:� N) ^.a.i • A. •I'ot �0ii �S�• 11 Sk :� - 30' ?x /55 I ,s• ! 15 �� j� (3►.31 3 Voo 1.0 *�U z 3r `'°"' r1 "'� - — - i4M►J� °v�130`+ " 3 ' 14 .66 jai ^� 1 S /fod ��f 1 �• �i• \ 1 =�. s.••a j t.,' IN ..�; t 'in 0 S •'4E'N ��/ t 1!'.n ^�/ - _j 10 1 �• 114" : • .: G O e- �. n , 't..t �£` �.. Sd9'46 W . r �� 115653 . 3 �► � OF 0 �9; �, 1� 12° I� 814' N IF ZIT 5 4 k -_ �A r `', �•. .BL lc 6� w000HILL �Edlna. Minnt'��Ita�N!►: —�� �b w t��29o''" 2 -`�/ ,.r • • se• sa . e .s: •tom s 3 1 • Gr O /oa 'r cd s,�� •c•:! •e•s/ -t• e ,,, , e� = ° 3 �a• /¢i s'o•;•J. I. �1?S,_65 d !'�'1S rr r ° �•ss'► °c •o0 900 •0 , go- �:4' A� . �1 6 %'' _1i0 ' e / s 30 /OILS 3 0 /8� 4 '0657 ��. iv CBI) °n ,.,� ,30� 58�•4s'M � :'J, . �:/ _ 10 `n ( '� .4 S T i / o= °• c` o' _ S9 t6'IV� U e, 90. F'ocrg !•�II o 4 5 r tt rvv2 •+ 0 2 0 0 19 f 8 a ,!. 1?• o ..: 5 f Yl.: •�!ij ° o =o C /�JZsi • °- ` �,�G� r �S}r�•:#4 ' �p � , � 31' 3C /11i� l 3C; � ' � _ =�AA� — 'r•�° 3�� 30 �14 d i map e0 01 o a /?rG5 l: �O t 956 9'f /OZie��e x89'46 ..a '0 �+ °o- 38; 3 lq. 33. 26 t •_ y - ?- !o ,r 1t ;] e + v °! `• P' do d5 2 �s Ile 1179 1).41 I*? • �e DEL EYlS 3 S H �14� 1 h� }1� ., DD ION l 1 .• (�3 . 2 / ro d- 1r 5' laJ �PS.t �S I G �� g, If.l ,o Ito X .� 41 > >° IJ dz I' dr Po �� • cs do 5 . \ s ) 1 t l \ J7 q • . (}Vr) a' j v �51 r.'•J ° �2'; r' U 6 al 7 8 �i r \l �L C,e Iv�L �9 J? t.. x • ,�}1l =�Gti1 •� (�, "' . 9 10 : r s i s L� o d Sd z y� ec tcs w' • cr Z4? Pf ? It •a• f 2 + /a) h h JS Sr tr U ;� V vn t. M J7 Sr'sr �I� / • ' b ANDOVER J 471 d• ROAI I �n /� 6 ,� i u x1.11- Rw J• td •1 Jc rc >, Sr•': � V I uFR 4 L�w6 -L,6 •4s'sr a'1 �' SJ e 4 �M .. J o 7 R ( \�� 3 !'� 1 6j,% -tc Ss �'0 W ! 6 .3 11>``4' �24� °- (23) tIP 2� , �'.a -f� tio" �! 2 bp O �� .• dj1 ae , 4. 1I' °. Al 19 h 1 M`�p nr C Y ti N ' 1A ?* 0��9 310" tl w 12 3° !; +,� S �° 9 11,1 . a:� isir a�17i 133 L` a it rt R N E °O/ is •:c r 90 !•�! jJ\ ♦S• V J'i Jl -t0 Y °S. llti)de•�� 4 5 r% 4 14 BELVIDERE $ LANE R tdd cc r tiJ tc a <tT! d 5 7.i, K .Q )S n!J a-rstl.'ari•tt dl +� .41, �b$t t .Y iS L •i►. ..i = "ti.� .. y • r tfyv f:C L_.. K'�' 11 f'�,ti' � �' �� . •� {i i x.71 .� ��;��•j� ' f .a- � Q• 1 :.fit 4 r a. 'S•� A _ • • ` �... •� 2: �� � yl:.•ti:: .= 'tea '- � _ �.�`� ,• IL It :All r 9 , L ff Lc .ii -.• c t '' st .r.T �: •d 1�.7i•. °""�:';,--.lt' -i z.�,,,•wFs _'ST'�'q'r.�' .,,,, y `:. 'S,j 'r c ' •s lea �� s - r. � : �'` � Y� *s:� ,,• � �-, ' • ` ; . 1 '41 .r ��s ~t f 'iv 'si_ 'y i S y t 'S 6 i• .�� ,.., _ r'•. tk '�'_ a�vF +r -.t •%� ." 1lt - - -�' w' ... + ?'t '•`.r, s. �'• , `• ~�r� � t *1E' i;� _F j�,. -'� �j. ': � •�/ . *• •?' a 1 -lc -`��' `sit. •�� - 8<- i ;'- ^'�• '!' �`,i.` ��" Y E •`� :•� • •- • � - ;t. s .�,�.. -� • :; y' Y� K 'S7 n� -♦ in •..V.•. ►.. w_ wl.i ft�3� ?r'f"aa✓_""�ry�, - t.,$F..X �`rxG,• '�`¢�•4•�yy.►,;t A,.. r,r,�,` °t 'y�'- '"!"�r `� f� ,Z 7 '� .. - s h 'S k '7!'�•v.N 1 t! ... O t .ai ,y,_ � • t fy ..' 1 ti x � _ L .` �.f •.. .a -� �. y ��'a� • •n "r .f�K: �. ~�' O ) ti'4� `~ .. .� ..': I�r � �- •� �.T�y; J`� �a ���.'` ° f+ r': •. i tom.,..'.. '�0�, _ �titi.G t rf '"r'�`� -t - } t` ��, r }r a i .. -'4• r� ' Y ti-' k: �:.., q... =wyy 't _, ti`_S� •.►. ' i _ ` Y 1 "" .•ea y� • t.,IP.v..+{ii siy` t ri ♦. Y t{� :iYi"T .cr Ttr ne 3 � :a� i may} z - `i�%: *'�, i -; - r.. _ y..� , � `s� � :' :.� : s .� M�• �` sa • _ 3: 1 Z nvL' •-� �• ,+'w!•,�{w•�•=�: ~' '! � } +.w iO- _� �•�A� •� �: `��ys i v' :t�� ,r. i T e w --tip January 14, 1985 The Honorable C. -Wayne Courtney Mayor of the City of Ed.ina and. The Honorable City Council Members Strgar- Roscoe, Inc., consultant engineers, will present its recomme`nd.ations resulting from its West 70th Street Traffic Operations and. Safety Study on Janurary 2I, 1985. There are -some areas of the study which need amplification so that certain assumptions will not develop which would.possibly lead. to some consideration of interim or temporarary actions which'will dilute and. negate the recommend.a- tions. Therefore, I will appreciate you providing the necessary time to be heard. along with others that support the recommendations as presented. with no intr!rim or quick fix action that will dilute the consultants plan. We thank you for your pant objective manner in considering our traffic problem on West 70th street. Harold. E. Babb 470I West 70th Street Edina, Din. 5511.35 'ncerely, Harold. E. Babb Advisory Committee -Js� � j January 10, 1985 C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN. 55424 Dear Mr. Courtney: I have been a resident at the southeast corner of the inter- section of West Shore Drive and W. 70th Street for 22 years and am greatly concerned about the traffic safety on W. 70th Street. I have read the draft copy of the "'Nest 70th Street Traffic Operations and Safety Study" and believe that in general it is a sensible approach to the existing problems. The recommendations set forth include practical steps, in particular the proposal to stripe the street as a two lane roadway consistent with the stan- dard operating capabilities of a 40 foot wide street., with left turn lanes, improved stop lines: and crosswalk markings. There axe some points that I would like to comment upon. Continued random saturation enforcement. programs during all hours of the day should remind the regular users of IN. 70th Street that traffic laws will be enforced. The study observation that 1185th percentile speed is 37 m.p.h. (15 percent are higher)" would indicate-:that almost all drivers on W. 70th Street exceed the 30 m.p.h. speed limit. Exc -essive speed is still one of the major prob- lems. Speeding cars naturally intimidate drivers who are waiting to enter W. 70th Street. I.question the statement that "currently traffic on W. Shore 'Drive must -wait an average of 2.28 minutes to cross (enter) 70th St. in .eak period." My driveway is approximately two car lengths from the stop sign and very rarely do I have to wait for traffic to clear before I can back out onto W. Shore Drive. From my own observations I would say that the wait at the stop sign is more in the range of 12 to 15 seconds. A four way stop is,not needelat this intersection; especially not on a temporary basis, which would only tend to fur- ther complicate an already confused situation. I am oppose d also to a traffic signal light at "Jest Shore Drive. Provision for a signal is the very last suggestion made by the study, and then only if improvement does not come about as a result of any other measures recommended in 9 paragraphs in the "Recommendation" section of the study. There are many more dis- advantages the advantages to a signal at the W. Shore Drive and 70th Street intersection, and also many alternate solutions. Has a study been made as to the possibility'b f somehow making 66th Street between Hwy. 100 and Valley View Road an alternate East /West collector street to serve the Southdale area and provide traffic volume relief on W. 70th Street? Thank you for allowing me to express my views. I trust that-- you and the Council members will consider the permanent effects upon the residentsof the IV. 70th Street area when making your final decisions on this matter. copies: City Council Members Harold E. Babb Sincerely, Bohn W. Thompson 7001 West Shore Drive Edina, MN 5545 TO: COUNCIL MEMBERS MEMORANDUM FROM: C. WAYNE COURTNEY, MAYOR SUBJECT: VACANCIES ON BOARDS /COMMISSIONS DATE: JANUARY 17, 1985 Listed below are the various Boards or Commissions on which there are still vacancies to be filled. I would appreciate your giving me any names of persons you might recommend for these positions so that we can appoint individuals to those positions at the Council Meeting of February 4: Board of Appeals and Adjustments (3 yr terms - rotation to be.implemented Human Relations Commission Heritage Preservation Board -C beginning 2 -1 -85 - Meets 1st and 3rd Thursday) (3 yr terms - Meets 3rd Tuesday) (School Appointee) (2 yr terms - Meets 4th Tuesday) Advisory Board of Healih (2 yr terms - Meets on call, min. 4 mtgs. yr) Consumer Consumer Consumer MEMORANDUM TO: COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: MAYOR COURTNEY SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT TO STATE CHS ADVISORY COMMITTEE DATE: JANUARY 18, 1985 Barbara Reynolds, Chairman of the Edina Advisory Board of Health, has contacted me with the recommendation that Dr. Sharon Aadalen, 4924 Dale Drive,be appointed to the State CHS Advisory Committee as representative from Edina. (This was the position held by June Schmidt and she has resigned from that Committee.) Mrs. Reynolds would like to have an appointee to the Committee so that the individual can attend the next scheduled meeting on January 25, 1985. If you concur, I will also be recommending that Dr. Sharon Aadalen also be, appointed to the Edina Advisory Board of Health when we make those appointments in February. s L TO: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER FROM: Bob Kojetin DATE: January 17, 1985 RE: TREE TRIMMING PROJECT - SET HEARING DATE The following improvement has been investigated and it has been determined that it is feasible and in the best interest of the City of Edina: PROJECT AND LOCATION ESTIMATED COST P -TT -03 Tree Trimming Project with assessment to the home owners, for boulevard trees in the Northwest Quadrant of the City of Edina. $60 per tree Exact location: The area bounded by Crosstown Highway to the Northern Boundary line and from Highway 100 to the Western Boundary Line (County Raod 18) Total number of trees to be trimmed is 1604. $96,240 TOTAL This project should be an assessed project to the homeowners with an assessment only for trees trimmed. The proposed hearing date would be March 4, 1985. . BK:mk 'L •• - M E M O R A N D U M DATE: January 18, 1985 TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members FROM: Ken Rosl and , City Manager SUBJECT: WINE LICENSING Following the advisory referendum on wine licensing on November 6, 1984, in which 77.4% of the registered voters cast a ballot in the election, the Council directed staff to bring back information and an ordinance regarding on -sale wine licensing. Of the 30,331 people who voted in the election, 85% expressed an opinion on wine -only licensing, with 19,697 voting "Yes" and 6,141 voting "No," representing a 76.2% approval rate by those voting on the issue. Attached to this memorandum are the following items: - Issues and Alternatives Identification - This is a list of items identified by staff, together with alternatives and recommendations developed for the eventual development of an ordinance. - Draft Ordinance - This is the staff recommendation subject to refinement by council direction to incorporate on -sale wine licensing within the current Edina liquor licensing ordinance. - List of Potential Applicants - Based on information from the Edina Chamber of Commerce, these are restaurants who expressed an interest in application for wine -only licensing: The fallowing represents one suggested way the Council may consider this issue: - Publ i'c Input In addition to the results of the advisory poll from the 6th, the Council may desire to receive additional testimony from interested parties regarding both a general issue of whether wine -only licensing should be permitted in the City, together with any specifics regarding an ordinance, should such be enacted. - Issue of On -Sale Wine Licenses The Council may then consider whether they desire to permit on -sale wine licensing or not. - Wine License Ordinance Should the Council desire to go further into the development of an ordinance, it is suggested that you: - IderRify any additional issues or alternatives - Indicate different directions than those included either in the draft ordinance or staff recommendation January 18, 1985 Mayor & Council Page Two - Development of Draft Ordinance Once the Council has decided the issue or issues and the desire included in the ordinance, the staff can revise the draft ordinance for first reading. Fees are not presently included in the Draft ordinance, since it would most appropriately be put in Ordinance 171 governing fees. It is suggested that the wine -only fees be set in the range of $550 to $650. As has also been identified, there may be an issue relating to the licenses to our country clubs as to the State law regarding the fee that can be charged for on -sale wine identifies a relationship to on -sale licenses. This is presently being researched with the State's Attorney General's office. Should you have any further questions, staff will be happy to respond or work to develop the research needed. KR /sw Attachments ex AREA I ISSUES MANAGER /STAFF RECOMMENDATION General Ordinance Financial A. Duration of Ordinance B. Number of Licenses C. Ongoing Enforcement D. Application Information needed Amount required by ord. E. City access to: - Financial records - Property'' roperty ..._. " F. Temporary Licenses G. Proration of Fee H. Time in Business A. Investigative Fees - Initial - Ongoing B. Deposit for Investigation C. Licensing Fees D. Bond E. Insurance F. Amount of investment G. % of sales H. Eligibility based on taxes, fees, assessments I. Transfer (other ?) J. Financial review - indebtedness A. Ongoing B. No limit C. Minimum two per year /in ord. D. BCA application plus enough to determine ordinance requirements met E. Not unless sales % set As at present F. Not permitted upder State law G. Quarterly H. Comment; Beer has 6 -mon. minimum unless 4/5's A. Actual cost within limits waived Up to $100 unless ownership changes signifi- cantly - 50% Or designated person in charge B. $500 /in state - if going out of state, $2000. Refund amount unused. C. Estimated cost $500 -550 D. State maximum - $5000 E. State requirement F. Nothing apart from approved kitchen G. No H. Yes I. 50% change in ownership /change in form J. Requirement as to sources and amounts AREA Condition of Sale General Conditions of Sale/ Business IA. Limitation to Food B. Qualification as Food Establishment C. Hours of Sale D. Area of Service Limitation E. Age of Worker F. Size of Serving Container. G. Amusement Devices H. Live Entertainment A. Degree of Change Requiring Re- Licensing B. Compliance with Applicable City Codes C. Impact on Present Food Storage /Prep. /Service Individual Licenses [A. Of whom required B. Ineligible persons MANAGER /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Prohibit sales at bar (counter ?) - Requirement to have fully equipped kitchen A. Bloomington language - in conjunction with food /meal B. Must possess valid health licenses C. Same as beer /clubs D. - Must be consumed on premises of owner - Rooms designated on plans - Physical barrier - Public concourse - Outside of building excluded E. Age of persons working /State law F. Limit service to under one liter container G. Same as beer A. Any alteration effecting zoning, seating, space of seating or serving areas, storage of food /wine B. Must be in ongoing compliance with applicable codes C. Sufficient product storage - Not effecting proper food storage /prep/ service areas A. Manager does not recommend Staff does recommend for wine -only for anyone actually serving B. Disqualified if not of age or any law violation - Liquor, gambling, etc. Index AREA ISSUES MANAGER /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Conditions Prohib- - Good moral character iting Licensing Issue to Persons - Individual, partnership, corporation - U. S. citizen Limiting Conditions /Persons Conditions Required of Location /Prohibiting Locati - Legal age - Criminal record /5 years - Liquor, gambling, other controlled substances, theft and vice - Revocation of liquor licenses - No limitation on # of licenses; person /spouse can have interest Non compatible activities - Manufacturer /wholesaler of intoxicating liquor - Federal /wholesale /retail liquor dealers or gambling license - City of Edina employees or elected officers Falsification of information No restriction on who can be a building owner Designated person (partnership /corporation) in charge. -must meet same requirements as individual licensee, plus have an individual mgr. license On renewal denial: - Violations of sale conditions - Failure to pass applicable codes - Zoning limited•to C1, C2, C3, mixed use and restaurants permitted in R1 districts - No limit from specific buildings, schools, etc. - Parking tied to seating - Common entrance? II - 25 -seat minimum - No square foot requirements ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A2 DRAFT ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING NO. 902 TO ALLOW SALES OF WINE ONLY IN FOOD ESTABLISMENTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Definitions. To Section 1 the following definitions are added: Bar - A counter at which wine is served but such service is not in conjunction with regular full menu service at counter. City - City means the City of Edina. Council - Council means the Council of the City of Edina. Licensed premise - Area shown in the application as the place where wine will be served and consumed. Meal - Meal means entrees and sandwiches offered on a restaurant menu. Person - Person means and includes any individual, partnership, association, trust, institution, corporation, or municipality, and includes also the municipal liquor store. Restaurants - means an establishment, under control of a single proprietor or manager, having appropriate facilities for serving meals and where in consideration of payment therefore, meals are regularly served at tables to the general public, and which employs an adequate staff to provide the usual and suitable service to its guests. Wine- A vinous beverage created by fermentation. Sec. 2. Sec. 21, No Liquor in Restaurants, is hereby amended by adding the words "except as permitted under Part H of this Ordinance." Sec. 3. Part H is hereby added as follows: "PART H. ON SALE OF WINE ONLY IN RESTAURANTS" Sec. 36. License Required. (a) No person shall, directly or indirectly, upon any pretense or by any device sell for on -sale or off -4ale any wine at or under 14% per volume in conjunction with the-sale of food without first having received a license therefor. (b) On -sale wine licenses shall be granted only to qualifying restaurants, as outlined below, holding a valid food establishment license under Ordinance 731. Sec. 37. Licensing Procedure. (a) The provisions of Ordinance No. 141 of the City including the penalty provisions thereof shall apply to all licenses required by this Ordinance for the sale of wine only and to the holders of such licenses, except that licenses and renewals thereof shall be granted or denied by the Council. Additionally, all licenses must be approved by the Commissioner of Public Safety. Every person licensed, or applying for a license, under this ordinance, in addition to other requirements imposed by this ordinance for the obtaining or renewal of alicense, shall demonstrate proof of financial responsibility with regard to a condition to the issuance or renewal of such license, in the manner and to the extent required by Minnesota Statute, Section 340.11, Subdivision 21, provided, if any licensee or applicant claims exemption from the requirements of said statute, proof of such exemption shall be established by affidavit given by such licensee or applicant, such affidavit to be in form and substance acceptable to the City Clerk. (b) In addition to the requirements set forth in Paragraph (a) of this section, the applicant shall in application form provide all information required by the State of Minnesota Department of Public Safety and such other information as deemed necessary by the City during the application process to determine compliance with the provisions of this ordinance. (c) Applications for the renewal of an existing license shall be made at least 60 days prior to and not earlier than 150 days prior to the date of expiration of the license. The renewal application may incorporate by reference all information contained in the original application, to the extent such information is then true, current, and applicable. If, in the judgment of the City Council, good and sufficient cause for the applicant's failure to apply for a renewal within the time provided is shown, the City Council may, if the other provisions of this ordinance are complied with, grant the application notwithstanding such failure to timely apply. (d) No license shall be transferred to any person or premises by the person or from the premises to whom and for which the license was granted, by any means whatsoever, including, without limitation, defise, descent, or involuntarily by the operation of law, without the person and premises to whom and to which the license is to be transferred having first submitted an application containing all of the information rquired in an original application, and complying with all requirements for an original license, and receiving the approval of the Council, and where required, the Commissioner of Public Safety, provided that an application for transfer may refer to, and incorporate therein by reference, the information set forth in the original application for the license to be transferred, to the extent such information is then true, current and applicable. (e) Any change in the persons named as partners as required by names listed of this ordinance and any change in the original application as required by Sec. 37 of this ordinance, including managers or persons in charge of the premises to be licensed, or change in designated area or seating, shall be deemed a transfer for purposes of this ordinance; provided, however, if the licensee is a limited partnership, a change in the limited partners of less than 10% cumulatively over the then license period, shall not be deemed a transfer; and provided further, however, that the change of stock owner of 10% or less in a corporate licensee shall not be deemed a transfer. Sec. 38. Financial Requirements. (a) Investigation Fees and Deposit - At the time of original application, the applicant shall deposit $500 with the City of Edina for the Investigation Fee. Should the investigation require an out -of -state investigation, an additional $2000 shall be deposited prior to further processing of the application by the City. The cost of the investigation shall be based "on the expense involved, but in no event shall it exceed $500 if the investigation is limited to the State of Minnesota or $10,000 if outside the State. All deposit monies not expended on the investigation shall be either applied to the license fee or refunded to the applicant. All investigative expenses incurred in excess of the deposit shall be paid prior to consideration of the license application by the Council. Investigation fees for license renewal shall not exceed $100 unless there is a change of ownership of more than 10%. (b) License Fees - The applicable fee is listed in Ordinance 171. Licenses terminated prior to the end of the term shall be prorated quarterly with fees being refunded for any quarter or quarters in which the license was not used. All fees shall be paid prior to consideration of license application by the Council. Should any license be denied, the fee shall be refunded except for $75.00. (c) Bond - The same requirements set forth in Sec. 11 of this ordinance applies to licenses under Part H. (d) Other Fees - All fees, assessments and taxes delinquent at issuance must be paid prior to issuance of the license as outlined in Sec. 12 (f) of this ordinance. Sec. 39. Conditions of Licensing. In addition to the conditions set forth in Sec. 12 (d) and (e) and Sec. 13 (d), the following conditions apply both as a condition of license approval and ongoing license retention: (a) Licensee - The licensee must; 1) Be of good moral character and repute. 2) Be of legal drinking age. 3) Be not ineligible under Minnesota Statutes Ch. 340. 4) If not an individual owner is either a partnership or a corporation. 5) If an individual not have within the five years prior to the application for a license been conficted of any violation of any law of the United States, the State of Minnesota, or any other state or territory, or of any local ordinance: a) with regard to the manufacture, sale, distribution or possession for sale or distribution of intoxicating liquor or other controlled substances; b) gambling; c) theft; d) vice; or e) who has had an intoxicating liquor license ;' including a wine -only on -sale license revoked for any violation of any ,' such laws or ordinance. 6) If a partnership or corporation must have a person a charge or manager who is generally present on the licensed premises who would be eligible pursuant to the provisions of this ordinance for a Part H license to be issued directly to him as an individual licensee. This person is to hold an individual manager's license and must sign a statement indicating he has reviewed and understands the pertinent sections of this Ordinance. The fee is set forth in Ordinance 171. 7) Not have applied for nor hold a federal wholesale or retail liquor dealer's special stamp or a federal or state gambling or gaming stamp or license. 8) Not be an employee or elected offidial of the City of Edina. 9) Not falsify any information given either in application or in the process of investigation. 10) On renewal not have been found in violation of any conditions of -sale. 11) If an individual must be a U.S. citizen. 12) Not be financially indebted to a person who is disqualifed under Subparagraphs 5, 7 and 11. (b) Licensed Premises - The licensed premises must meet the following requirements: 1) Is in a Cl, C2 or C3 or mixed -use zone or an authorized restaurant in R -1. 2) That it have a separate entrance or exit to the exterior from any business or building not under control of the licensee. Entrance or exit to a public concourse or public lobby meets this requirement. 3) That has a minimum of 25 seats at tables or booths in the designated area for service. 4) The licensed premises must be under the control of the licensee. 5) That a licensed premise have a valid food establishment license nd that it have a fully equipped and approved kitchen. 6) That appropriate space for storage, preparation or other handling or service of food not be adversely impacted by the storage and service of wine. 7) That a physical barrier must be placed between the public and the area where wine is served, except for approved or required entrances and exits to those areas. 8) Not outside a building unless the only access to and from the designated outside area is through the enclosed license restaurant. 9) Have the proposed licensed premises be in accordance with all applicable codes. Sec. 40. Conditions of Sale. That in addition to the conditions stated in Section 12 (a), (b), (g) and (h); Sec. 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 31 and 33, the following apply: (a) No person shall be sold, served, or consume wine who does not order a meal to be consumed with the wine. (b) No wine over 147 alcohol by volume may be sold or consumed. (c) No wine sales or consumption are permitted at a bar or beyond the licensed premises. (d) Wine may not be sold, served or consumed in containers larger in volume than one liter. (e) No person working in the designated area may be under the established legal drinking age except busboys, dishwashers and musicians. (f) No licensee shall promote the consumption of wine on the licensed premises by an means or methods which results in wine prices which are less than those normally chanrged on the'then regularly used menu, including, but not limited to, two for one or similar offers, prizes, coupons, games or barters. (g) No licensee shall sell, offer for sale, or keep for sale intoxicating liquors in any original package that has been refilled or partly refilled. No licensee shall directly or through any other person dilute, or in any manner tamper with, the contents of any original package so as to change its composition or alcoholic content while in the original package. Possession on the premises by the licensee of any intoxicating liquor in the original package differing in composition, alcoholic content or type from the liquor received from the manufacturer or wholesaler from whom it was purchased, shall be prima facie evidence that the contents of the original package have been diluted, changed or tampered with. (i) Licensees under Part H may sell wine as permitted from 12 o'clock noon to 12 o'clock midnight Sundays. (j) Can anticipate at least two inspections by the licensing authority annually. Sec. 41. Suspension and Revocation. The enforcement, suspension and revocation provisions of Ordinance No. 141 shall apply to all licenses issued under Part B of this ordinance. Sec. 42. Individual Licensing of Servers. (a) All personnel who physically serve wine to patrons must possess an individual server's license issued by the City. This does not prohibit unlicensed personnel from taking orders for wine in conjunction with the sale of food, but it may only be served by licensed personnel. (b) In order to be licensed, servers must meet the requirements set forth in Sec. 39 (a) (1, 2, 5, 9 and 11), together with signed statement indicating they have reviewed and understand the pertinent sections of this ordinance. (c) The license fee is set forth in Ordinance 171 and is not prorated upon termination. Szechuan Star 3655 Hazelton Rd. 175 Seats Brothers Deli 50th and France 185 Seats Empress Yorktown Mall 80 Seats J.P.'s 5125 Vernon 175 Seats Palm Court Southdale Center 118 Seats Daytons Southdale Center 200 Seats York Steak House Southdale Center 252 Seats Good Earth Galleria 120 Seats Vie de France Galleria 144 Seats Le Bistro Cafe Yorktown Mall 167 Seats Pantry 5101 Arcadia 115 Seats Ediner Galleria 110 Seats .Original Pancake House 3501 W. 70th St. 122 seats Rigotto's Pizza 45022 Valley View Rd. 95 Seats Southdale Bowl and Black Swan Pub 3401 W. 69th St 75 Seats MEMORANDUM TO: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CITY CLERK SUBJECT: EASEMENT VACATION GRANTED 8/6/84 - Lot 6, Blk 1 - The Habitat DATE: JANUARY 18, 1985 At its meeting of August 6, 1984, the Council granted a vacation of easement for the above referenced property which was identified as a "wetland easement" according to data furnished by the surveyor. Upon presenting the resolution for recording at Hennepin County, it was discovered that the original document identified the easement as a "drainage and utility easement" and the County would not accept the resolution as presented. Revision of the Council Minutes as it relates to the resolution granting the vacation is requested whereby all reference to "wetland easement" is changed to "drainage and utility easement" so that the resolution can be placed of record. a M RON KRUEGER & ASSOCIATESs INC. REGISTERED LAND SURVEYORS 7382. WASHINGTON AVENUE SO. EDEN PRAIRIE, MINN. 55344 PHONE 612- 941.3030 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Survey for A:7yloY 720N 'E15� Job No Bk. Pa Tti sC: � O ����^p C•sOS� h 0p ` 1 ��� �� P/1.2T Of' wETLANO EASEMENT .� Tb BE' `,gcATEp. 6 J9 Q �D ` j?.qA- 10V,a6f ,stvo r� LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PROPOSED VACATION OF *ET-tMDr'EASEMENT DRAwA&r- Ala IkTILIr� That part of the-w(;-,t1and easement over Lot 6, Block 11 The Habitat, lying Southeasterly of a line drawn "at right angles to the Northeasterly line, from a point on the Northeasterly line, a distance of 85.00 feet Northwesterly of the most Easterly corner of said Lot 6. I hereby certify that this Is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of .Z07- b ' 'gLoe& Tf h /3 &7W 7" County, Minnesota and of the location of all buildings thereon, and all visible encroachments, If any, from or on said land. Surveyed by me this daypf P% , 19 RON KRUEOPER $ ASSOCIATES, INC. STATE REG. NO. 14374 V- N z x TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, City Engineer VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: Project Feasibility & Authorization The Engineering and Utility Departments have completed analysis on two problem areas that need work during 1985. A. The first project locations is the Valley View Bridge over the Soo Line Railroad. The engineering department has completed testing of the deck on the bridge and found substantial "delamination" (separation of concrete layers and breaking away from rebars in bridge). The project proposed is to remove the top s?ction of the deck and correct rebar sections as necessary followed by a new concrete overlay. The estimated cost for this project is $29,373.52 which is proposed to be funded by state -aid reconstruction funds. We recommend that this project be authorized with plans and specifications be submitted to MNDOT State Aid office for approval. B. The second project is Well No. 9 redevelopment on Hansen Road. This well during the critical summer months has a reduced yield due to sand fill in the well hole and static water level drop. The yield during 1984 was approx- imately one half million gallons daily (350gpm). The well originally pro- duced over one million gallons daily. The loss of this one -half million gallon differential has considerable impact on our city system. The proposed project is to bail out the sand in the well hole, extend the existing column down to approximately 530 feet and reinstall "the well components. The net result of this project would be to increase the overall yield of the well to approximately 1.3 million gallons daily and extend the service life of the well considerably..,(see attached letter) The estimated cost of this project is approximately $48,000.00 to $50,000.00 .depending on the amount of sand in the hole. The funds used for this project .would be utility funds. r We would recommend approval of this project and authorization of plans and specifications for same. FJH:Im 1/18/85 SHORT- ELLIOTT- HENDRICKSON, INC. M%12 MIN ME CONSULTING ENGINEERS !� ® ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 0 CHIPPEWA FALLS, WISCONSIN October 10, 1984 RE: EDINA, MINNESOTA WELL NO. 9 SEH FILE NO. 84160 Fran Hoffman, Director of Public Works & Engineer City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Hoffman: After my meeting with you and Dick Palinka, I have reviewed the information that we have and that I obtained from you on Well No. 9. Below is summary of what was done: 1. Analyze the static water level drop since 1957. 2. Projected estimated future water levels. 3. Calculated anticipated pump conditions for the addition of two and, as an alternate three, stages. 4. Calculated down thrust for motor thrust bearing capacity. 5. Calculated required motor horsepower for addition of new stages. 6. Calculated pump shaft , stretch to obtain required pump lateral clearance. 7. Checked both- the 15 stage and 16 stage pumps for volume delivery versus anticipated present and future pumping levels. Copies of the pencil calculations sheets are enclosed for your information. Our recommendations are as follows: 1. Bail the material out of the well down to the bottom of the Hinckley. 2. Add three new pump stages with maximum impeller diameter and add approximately 100 feet of 8 inch by 1 -11/16 inch column and shaft. 200 GOPHER BUILDING • 222 EAST LITTLE CANADA ROAD • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 • PHONE (612) 484 -0272 a Fran Hoffman, October 10, 1984 Page 2 3. The total length of the pump, column, suction pipe and screen should not exceed 530 feet. 4. The new required horsepower is 181 horsepower with the addition of three new pump stages. 5. The motor thrust bearing should have a capacity of at least 8,000 pounds. 6. The existing pump bowls should be checked for 0.65 inch lateral and be machined to 0.65 inch lateral if necessary. 7. The new bowls should be machined for a lateral of 0.65 inches. 8. A new pump shaft will be required for the 16 stage pump. 9. The pump supplier should check motor and pump change recommendations before supplying in order to assure themselves that our calculations are correct. Based on the assumption that the rate of lowering of the static level will double every 20 years, as it has in the past 20 years, adding three stages is estimated to give you a summer pumping yield of approximately 940 gallons a minute in 1985, reducing to approximately 720 gallons per minute in 1995. This results in a satisfactory yield for the next 10 years. If the water level loss is less than anticipated, the satisfactory yield period would be extended, and conversely if it is greater than anticipated, it would shorten the satisfactory yield. If there is any additional information which you may need please let me know. jcj sincerely, Norman E. Hendrickson V '­7-1- M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: METRO COUNCIL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN DATE: January 18, 1985 On Monday, January 28, the Metropolitan Council will be holding a public hearing regarding their Solid Waste Management Development Guide /Policy Plan. The Edina Recycling Commission has been reviewing this and are on the agenda for Monday evening to discuss their interest and request direction from the Council as to how they should proceed. In a staff review of the document, the following are identified as issues for the Council consideration: - GENERAL Metro Council Involvement - The degree to which the Edina City Council feels the Metropolitan Council, as charged by the State of Minnesota, should be involved in the issue of solid waste. Cost of Plan Implementation - Since present landfill costs represent 10% of the solid waste disposal cost charged to the customer, the alternative of building recycling; composting transfer stationq and burn plants, etc., will increase the solid waste disposal cost to the customer by 30 to 40% by 1990. SPECIFIC MUNICIPAL CONCERNS Contracting Area:- It is assumed by the plan that it is more efficient for municipalities to establish contract districts and bid those or negotiate those out to contractors rather than to permit the continuance of the ongoing open system in which any contractor can serve any area, resulting in several contractors going up and down the same streets. Curb -side Recycling - Part of the recommendation to reduce the amount of trash is to have separation of recyclables and institute in each community curb -side recycling of such things as paper, glass and cans. While there may be several other areas of concern in the plan, we feel these represent the principal ones and request that the Council provide desired direction to staff and /or Recycling Commission as it relates to this plan. Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me. KR /sw i M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: COMPARABLE WORTH STUDY DATE: January 18, 1985 Attached is a proposed resolution authorizing the City Of Edina to participate in the Comparable Worth Study being conducted by the MAMA Cities. It is important that the Council take action on this matter. Also included is a bill for the amount the City will be assessed for participation in the study. The Council should approve this expenditure from contingencies. The additional material is a list of participants in the Study and a brief explanation of what the Study entails. Ceil Smith has been serving on the Committee that is working with Business Advisors of Control Data in the development and implementation of the Study. If you would like further information, please contact me or Ceil. KR /sw Attachment s S A M P L E R E S O L U T I O — N — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN THE CONTROL DATA BUSINESS ADVISORS, INC. JOINT COMPARABLE WORTH STUDY. WHEREAS: Minnesota Statutes 471.991 enacted in 1984 requires all political subdivisions in the State to establish equitable compensation relationships among its employees; and WHEREAS: The Metropolitan Area Management Association, the Coalition of Outstate Cities, the Minnesota Municipal Utilities Association and other related public jurisdictions desire to meet the requirements of the law through a joint job evaluation study; and WHEREAS: The Metropolitan Area Management Association in consultation with representatives of outstate cities and after meeting and confering with representatives of organized labor screened and selected Control Data Business Advisors, Inc. as the consultant to perform the study; and WHEREAS: The cost of the study is to be divided among the participating jurisdictions in the following manner: Each entity will pay a base charge of Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000.00) and a charge per employee of Thirty -five Dollars ($35.00) per person. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina that it hereby approves participation of the City in the Joint Comparable Worth Study to be conducted by Control Data Business Advisors, Inc. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the sum of $10,550.00 based on the above specified fqrmula be transmitted to the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota which city has offered to serve as the fiscal agent and contractor for the duration of the study. Dated this day of , 1985. Mayor Clerk /Administrator /Manager Metropolitan Area Management Affociation of the Twin City Area January 8, 1985 Mr. Ken Rosland City Manager City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Mr. Rosland: The fee assessed to your jurisdiction for participation in the Joint Comparable Worth Study of the Metropolitan Area Management Association and conducted by Control Data Business Advisors, Inc. is as follows: BASE FEE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,000.00 210 Employees* x $35.00 per employee .$ 7,350.00 Search and screening of consultant . . . .$ 200.00 TOTAL DUE . . . .$10,550.00 This fee is due upon receipt of this statement. YOUR CHECK SHOULD BE MADE PAYABLE TO THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY AND FORWARDED ALONG WITH A COPY OF THIS STATEMENT TO: a Mr. William S. Joynes, City Manager Chairman, MAMA General Labor Relations Committee City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427 *If the number of employees in your jurisdiction is incorrect please make the appropriate adjustment and extension to the statement fowarded along with your check. CITIES PARTICIPATING IN JOINT COMPARABLE WORTH STUDY Albert Lea Maplewood Alexandria Mendota Heights Anoka Minnetonka Apple Valley Minnetrista Bemidji Moorhead Benson Mora . Blaine Morris Bloomington Mound Brainerd Mounds View Breckenridge New Brighton Brooklyn Center New Hope Brooklyn Park New Ulm Burnsville North St. Paul Champlin Northfield Chaska Oakdale Circle Pines Orono Cloquet Ortonville Columbia Heights Plymouth Coon Raids Prior Lake Cottage Grove Ramsey Crookston Redwood Falls Crystal Richfield Deephaven River Falls Delano Robbinsdale Eagan Rochester East Grand Forks Roseville Eden Prairie Rosemount Edina St. Anthony Elk River St. Cloud Excelsior St. James Farmington St. Louis Park Fergus Falls St. Paul Park Forest Lake St. Peter Fridley Savage Golden Valley Shakopee Hastings Shoreview Hopkins So. St. Paul Inver Grove Heights Stillwater Lakeville Thief River Falls Lino Lakes Wayzata Litchfield West St. Paul Little Falls White Bear Lake Mankato Winona Maple Grove Woodbury 1/8/85 = 88 Cities 4 J'1.'1I,I'CIE;S PARTICIPATING IN JOINT COMPARABLE WORTH STUDY Anoka Brainerd Buffalo Chaska Elk River Grand Marais Hutchinson Marshall Moorhead 1/8/85 = 18 Utilities Mora New Ulm North St. Paul Owatonna Princeton Shakopee Thief River Falls Virginia Wells OTHER ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATING IN JOINT COMPARABLE WORTH STUDY Metropolitan Airorts Commission 1/8/85 = 1 Other Organization J: -m CITY -WIDE COMPENSATION STUDY WHAT IS A COMPENSATION STUDY? All cities in the state of Minnesota are required to study the compensation of their employees to determine if salaries have been established fairly. Cities must report the results of their studies to the state by October 1, 1985. Many cities within the metropolitan area as well as outside the metropolitan area, have joined together to complete the study. Control Data Business Advisors, a company of Control Data specializing in compensation, has been hired to assist the cities in completing the compensation studies. In this way the process is economical and the results are consistent. HOW WILL THE COMPENSATION Control Data Business Advisors will use their job analysis STUDY BE DONE? and evaluation system named FOCAS to complete the study. The data obtained and analyzed will give each city the information they need to meet the state's reporting requirement. WHAT IS FOCAS? FOCAS stands for Flexible D—Ccupational Analysis system. FOCAS as a job analysis system is used to describe jobs and the work employees perform. EmpjQyees are asked to provide information about the jobs they perform using Occupational Analysis Questionnaires (OAQs). Because employees know the content of their jobs very well, their input into FOCAS assures that accurate and comprehensive data can be gathered. FOCAS job data can resource problems. as a _job evaluatio consistently value jobs are graded ba; job. be used to solve a variety of human As a compensation tool, FOCAS is used i system to more accurately and the work employees perform. With FOCAS, sed on the tasks being performed in the HOW DOES FOCAS JOB ANALYSIS Job analysis is the process of gathering information WORK? about jobs and work in order to make effective human resource management decisions. The foundation of FOCAS job analysis is the Occupational Analysis Questionnaire, or OAQ. The OAQ is a listing of tasks, arranged by duty and subduty, an employee in a given job area might perform. An employee completes a questionnaire to describe his or her job by marking off the appropriate tasks and estimating the time spent on tasks relative to each other. Time Spent Profiles: The OAQ data is analyzed and an individual job description or Time Spent Profile is produced. Each employee's job is described in terms of his or her duties, subduties, and tasks., and the amount of time spent on them. The data is taken directly from the person's responses on the questionnaire. Before FOCAS is implemented, every employee reviews the profile with his or her manager to make sure it is accurate. Benchmark Job Descriptions: Individual profiles are combined to create group job descriptions. From these, benchmark descriptions are identified. (Benchmark jobs are jobs common across an industry and have large numbers of people in them. Benchmarks are used to compare salaries to the external market.) A FOCAS benchmark job description lists the job's duties, subduties, and tasks, and the average time spent on each duty and subduty. It includes a narrative summary of the job's highlights. FOCAS job descriptions are useful in job classification and evaluation, for recruiting, and in career planning and development. The FOCAS job analysis process gives us the capability to accurately document what people do on their jobs. This information is invaluable for effective human resources management. WHAT ABOUT FOCAS The grade or level of a given job is determined by the JOB EVALUATION? value of the tasks which comprise the job. The tasks are assigned values by large numbers of supervisors who know the work well and who represent the entire organization. FOCAS job evaluation is less subjective than many other systems because the value data comes from many sources and is consistently applied to all jobs in the job family, regardless of location. FOCAS job evaluation, then, is the method used to assign grades or levels to jobs in an understandable, equitable, and consistent manner. .1 WHAT DO I NEED TO DO? Because the FOCAS system relies on information from employees, supervisors, and personnel, you may be asked to help in one or more of the phases of this process. If you are, remember that you will be representing many other employees who were not asked. Take that responsibility seriously and participate as effectively as you can. HOW WILL THE RESULTS OF THE It is too early to know the answer to this question but COMPENSATION STUDY AFFECT ME? you will be kept informed of the results of the study and what the next step will be. MAMA122043 If you have any questions, please discuss them with your supervisor or with your personnel representative. This is an important and ambitious project but the information that will come from it will increase the effective use of human resources. Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: ,- ATTEST: ' Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A19 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 171 TO CORRECT FEE FOR VENTILATION -WORK PERMIT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. The amount of the following described Fee Numbers of Schedule A to Ordinance No. 171 are hereby amended to read as follows: ORD. SEC. NO. NO. AMOUNT FEE NO. 433 6(d) Ventilation work permit 3. Domestic type kitchen or bathroom exhaust system Each system when vented individually in single $5.00 or multiple dwellings 44:6 799 15d -5 Each additional system 5.00 15d -5a. Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: ,- ATTEST: ' Mayor CURRENT ASSETS: Cash: Demand Deposits Working Fund Contracts Receivable Loan To Other Funds Inventory: Liquor Wine Beer and Mix Prepaid Expenses: Unexpired Insurance Supplies LIQUOR FUND BALANCE SHEET CITY OF EDINA As At October 31, 1984 TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS FIXED ASSETS: Land Land Improvements Buildings Furniture and Fixtures Leasehold Improvements Less: Allowance for Depreciation and Amortization CURRENT LIABILITIES: Trade Accounts Payable Accrued Payroll SURPLUS: Invested in Fixed Assets Unappropriated $ 22,979.83 729,769.27 306,735.14 3,035.55 $1,062,519.79 467.361.38 TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS $ 222,659.42 3,800.00 $ 364,271.99 275,676.27 75,290.92 $ 226,459.42 39,786.69 415,000.00 715,239.18 $ 13,778.30 400.00 14,178..30 $1,410,663.59 $ 233,784.60 TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 595,158.41 828,943.01 2,239,606.60 $ 152,669.69 13,472.28 $ 166,141.97 $ 828,943.01 1,244,521.62 2,073,464.63 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS $21,239,606.60 SALES: Liquor Wine Beer Mix and Miscell Less bottle refunds NET SALES COST OF SALES: LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF INCOME AND EXPENSE CITY OF EDINA Ten Months Ending October 31, 1984 and October 31, 1983 INCREASE 19R4 1983 DECREASE* _ 50th Street Yorkdale - Grandview Total 50th Street Yorkdale Grandview Total $ 420,828.05 260,121.46 207,149.92 Is 13,584.58 901,684.01 $ 866,100.07 489,600.43 403,322.53 31,448.34 $1,790,471.37 21.790.98 541,157.45 879,893.03 $1,736,313.92 $ 794,155.77 419,716.10 361,566.31 28.509.88 $1,603,948.06 $2,081,083.89 $461,468.41 1,169,437.99 270,341.50 972,038.76 216,703.24 73,542.80 14,021:9.3 $4,296,103.44 $962,535.08 50,789.11 126,737.54 24,645.11 $1,553,158.95 $4,169,365.90 $937,889.97 Inventory -January 1 175,604.42 289,642.25 237,950.02 703,196.69 Purchases 761,378.04 1,382,186.84 ' 1,237,220.84 3,380,785.77 $ .936,982.46 $1,671,829.14 $1,475,170.86 $4,083,982.46 Inventory OCT-31 217,400.94 273,187.27 224,650.97 715,239.18 $ 719.581.52 $1,398,641.87 $1,250.519.89 $3,368,743.28 209,893.84 753.421.42 $963,315,26 186,368.28 $776.946.98 $ 926,484.74 $ 824,363.76 504,759.34 425,675.44 404,389.56 351,440.75 31,253.92 289865.79 $1,866,887.56 $1,630,345.74 $2,212,316.91 $131,233.02* 1,200,776.28 31,338.29* 972,533.55 494.79* 74,141.64 598.84* $4,459,768.38 $163,664.94* 53,549.38 55,070.18 133,264.67 1,813,338.18 $1,575,275.56 $4,326,503.71 6,527.13* 157,137.81* 303,342.64 256,136.67 769,373.15 66.176.46* 1, 465, 837.91 `13,276,159.83 3,495,419.16 114,633.39* $1,769,180.55 $1,532,296.50 $4,264,792.31 $180,809.85* 253,975.06 213,439.66 653,783.00 61,456.18 $1.515.205.49 $1, 318 ,856.84 $3,611 1 009.31 $242,266.03* GROSS PRO F11$ 160,311.51 $ 337,672.05 $ 302,639.06 $ 800,622.62 $160,942.99 $ 298,132.69 $ 256,418.72 $ 715,494.40 $ 85,128.22 OPERATING EXPENSES: Selling 56,612.49 101,052.64 80,532.77 238,197.90 55,586.76 102,063.80. 87,183.41 244,833.97 6,636.07* Overhead 33,646.36 45,731.43 36,925.77 115,403,56 30,273.49 47,693.78 36,764.27 114,731.54 672.02 Administrative 65,892 96 83,165 66 69,826 85 218,885 47 59,520.40 79,700.86 62,746.2.7 201,967.53 16,917.94 TOTAL OPER ATIN q 156,151 81 $ 229,949 73 $ 186,385 39 $ 572,486 93 $145,380.65 $ 229,458.44 $ 186,693.95 $ 561,533.04 $ 10,953.89 EXPENSES NET OPE RATING $ 4,159.70 $ 107,722.32 $ 116,253.67 $ 228,135.69 $ 15,562.34 $ 68,674.25 $ 69,724.77 $ 153,961.36 $ 74,174.33 PROFIT OTHER INCOME: Cash Discount 10,627.75 18,563.70 16,453.76 45,645.21 10,785.14 21,263.44 18,462.58 50,511.16 4,865.95* Cash over or under 2.34* 213.61* 39.16 176.79* 66.79* 539.48* 138.66 467.61* 290.82 Income on investments Other -0- 983.85 1,300.25 780.85 -0- 3,064.95 -0 -. 751.58 577.31 480.22 -0- 1,809.11 -0- 1,255.84 $ 11,609 26 $ 19,650 34 $ 17,273 77 $ 48,533.37 $ 11,469.93 $ 21,301.27 $ 19,081.40 $ 51,852.66 $ 3,319.29* NET INCOME $ ' 15 768.96 $ 127 372.66 $ 133 527.44 $ 276,669.06 $ 27,032.27 $ 89,975.52 $ 88,806.23 $ 205,814.02 $ 70,855.04 PERCENT TO NET SALES: Gross profit Operating expenses" Operating profit Other income NET INCOME 18.22% 19.44% 19.48% 19.20% 17:16% 16.44% 16.28% 16.54% 17.75 13.24 12.00 13.73 15.50 12.65 11.85 12.98 6.20% 7.48% '5.47% 1.66% 3.79% 4.43% 3.56 % - 1.32 1.13 1.11 1.16 1.22 1.17 1.21 1.20 1.79% 7.33% 8.59% 6.63% " -g% 4.96% 5.64% 4.76% r A. 1933 CITY OF EDINA CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT 00.2067 U1/16/85 897.75 OJ2067 J1/16185 11.25 UJ2U67 01/16/85 1,070.92 UU2067 01/16/85 14.43 JU2067 01/16/85 •90 002067 U1/16/85 29.9$ , e OJ21 29 O1 /16/85 00.2129 0'1/16/85 * ** * ** 002135 01/16/85 0U.21 35 0.1/16/85 OU.21 35 0.1/16185 002135 01/16/85 372135 01/16/85 002135 C1/16/85 002135 01/16185 00.2135 i1 /16 185 **. * ** 2,325.20 • 6,897.1 5 6,019.70 12,915.85 • .57- 14.74 - 1.46 2.55- 28.40 736.98 72.78 - 127.65 946.49 • * ** -CKS 50.3710- 822 -82. MANUAL - - - 5)- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 01 -21 -85 PAGE 1 MANUAL CHECK REGISTER MANUAL _. 50 -4628- 822 -82 V =NDO1, ITEM_ DESCRIPTION,-_,-_- _._- _..- .A000UNT,.NO._.INV. -p. P.O. p_ MESSAGE . CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL CAPITAL CITY _ DISTRI 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL CAPITAL CITY _ DISTRI -� 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL U.1/16/85 304.50 E) - - - - - -- - - * ** -CKS 002138 J.1/16185 298.41 - 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL BELL30In 00.2139 01/16/85 _50- . 50.4626- 862 -86 - -_._- MANUAL BELL3Of' 50 -4628- 842 -84 OU2138 u1/16/85 815.50 * ** -CKS 50.3710- 822 -82. MANUAL - - - 5)- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 _ MANUAL _. 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 _. MANUAL - --- - - - - -- - MANUAL EAGL= WIN= _ 6.3.9- - EAGL= ._. YIN_ _..- - - - -- 50 -3710- 842 -84 EAGLE WIN-- 1.7)_ EAGL: WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 EAGLE _. W -IN. _. EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 EAGLE U ?N: 17.73- -EAGLE - -- - -- . WINE - _ ___. _ 50 -4628 862 86 50 3710 - 822 -82 0021 38 U1 /16/85 _ 6.3.9- - - E) PH!LLIP3 _..- - - - -- 50 -3710- 842 -84 002138 01/16/85 1.7)_ �0 PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 002138 0.1/16/85 16.33- ED PiILLID,S 50- 3710- 842 -84 GJ.2138 U1/16/85 17.73- E) PHILLIPtS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 OU2138 u.1/16/85 25.08- E) PiILLI'S 50- 3710 - 862 -86 072138 U1/16/85 4.89- ED PiILLI *,S 50 -4626- 842 -84 002138 U1/16/85 -- 1,254.15 E) PHILLIP'S "._. __ _ __.___.___. ..____. 50- 4628 - 822 -82 OU2138 U.1/16/85 304.50 E) PiILLIDIS ,. 50- 4628- 922 -82 002138 J.1/16185 298.41 - ED PHILLIaS 50- 4628- 822 -82 00.2139 01/16/85 298.41 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 842 -84 OU2138 u1/16/85 815.50 E) PH ILLIP'S 50- 4628- 842 -84 00.2138 0.1/16/85 85.'00 ED PHILLIaS 50- 4628- 842 -84 002138 01/16/85 886.25 E) PHILLIPS _ _ _. _.. -. -...__ _ . - - -.- 50- 4628- 862 -86- 002138 01/16f85 244.50 ED PHILLIPS 1,223.50 CRIGGS COJoER 3,519.).8 * ** -CKS -MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL _ MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL # # * *s• _. - - - -__.- • *.-CKS 002190, 01/16/85 17.91 -___- - •___GRIGGS- COOPER AND C_ -_.._. 50- 3710 - 822 -82 _ -__ -_ 50 -3710- 842 -84 __ MANUAL MANUAL JJ2190 Ll /16fFS 102. °2 - GRIGSS COOPER AN) C 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL U,,21 On 01/16/A5 33.18- GRIG3S CO•)PER AN) C 57- 3710- 362 -86 MANUAL ;:0.219[. u1/16/85 30.9,- G*IG3S COOPER AND C 5 ,)- 3710 - 362 -86 MAWU'L 0.,21 9^_•. L1 /16185 24.47- G? IGGS CO-'DER AN) C 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 7 L�121 00 61/16/85 998.33 GRIG;S COOPER AND C 5J- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 00.2190 0,1/16/85 - 1,659.810 - - - -- - - __ -- -- - - -- GRIGSS CO] ER - ^- A140 --- C ____-- -------- - -- - - -- -------- - - - -50- 4526 - 842 -84 - MANUAL 01.21 90 J1 /16 85 5,140.84 ,, GRIGGS o C00 -ER AN) C 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL Ju2190 J1/16I95 1,223.50 CRIGGS COJoER AP13 1985 CITY 0= CD!N;, CHr=CK REGIST =R 01 -21 -85 PAGE 2 CHECK N'?. DATE AMOUNT. _ -_ VcV00?- _- __, -- ,_..ITFM,_DESCRIP.T-ION._. -__ -- ___ACCOUNT NO. .174V. p P.O. -4 M_37AG'- U0219' ?, X1/16/85 1v544.92 GRIG3S CO)PER AN? 50- 4626- .362 -86 MANUAL c 1?v257.�5 f ...... ' ••• -CKS 4 liu2!98 (1/14/85 6 13 ^.49 ,R ;U' H =ALTH EMPLOYERS HOSP 10- 4156- 510 -51 MANUAL , 6,130.49 f 111111 a**-CKS (;02271 01/16/85 7.96- INTEIC04TINENTAL PK _ _ - 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 002271 01/16/85 10.71- I4TEIC04TINENTAL PK _ -50- 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 002271 01/16/85 5.63- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL � 002271 01/16/85 83.63- INTEIC04TINENTAL PK _ 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL UU2211 01/16/85 16.50 INTEICONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL DJ2271 U1/16/85 535.70 I4TERCJNT*_NENTAL PK 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL r 002271 01/16/85 _ — 49181.98 _ INTEtC04TINENTAL PK ___ ___ _ 50- 4626- 842 -84 _ MANUAL 10.2271 3.1/16195 59.25- T4TEtCJ4TINE4TAL PC 50-4626-842-84 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL OJ2271 71/16/85 398.28 I`JTS1CONTINENT4L PK 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL w 002271 01/16/85 _ __- 3.90 INTE2CONTINENTAL PK _ _50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 002271 01/16185 291.56 INT_tCOVTINENTAL PK 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 3j2271 0.1/16/85 1.50 IITEACONTINE4TAL PK 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 4 -- ---- - - -5.� 262.04.-.* - - lkffff • *• -CKS � Dj,2285 U1/16/85 4.24- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL UU2285 01016/85 .C8 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 00,2285 01/16/85 3976- _ JOHNSOV WINE -. _.._. __...._ _ ---.-------------50-3710-842-84 MANUAL :,0.2285 01/16/85 8.46- JOHNSOV WINE _ 5D- 3710 - 842 -84 _ _ MANUAL D 002285 01/16/85 . ^9 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 4 002235 01/16/85 _ -_ .08 JOHNSOV WINE - 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL OJ2285 !'1/16/85 423.45 JOHNSON WINE _ 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL Ou2285 01/16/85 1.80 J)HNSOV WINE 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 002285 01/16/85 -- - 2.10 JOHNSOV WINE - - — - - -- - - -- - - -: 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 30,2255 0.1/16/85 212.15 JOHNSON WIVE 50- 4628- 822 -82 _ MANUAL UJ2285 01/16/85 1.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL OU2285 0.1/16/85 _ 181618 _ JOHNSON WINE _ 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL OU.2295 01/16/85 4.15- JOHNSON WINE __— _ 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 00,2285 01/16/85 4.98- JOHNSOV WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 00.2285 01/16/85 _ _. 4.15- _.JOHNSON WINE _- 50- 4628 -- 862 -86 MANUAL 799.99 • t b fff ff f + +• -CKS OU2415 01/14/85 69324.85 MED CENTER MEP HOSP 10 -4156- 510 -51 MANUAL r ,' v - - - -- ----- - - --.6. *.324. R 5 '- - -- - -- - - - 1 f f f f f f * ** -CKS w 002433 01/16/85 1 0 PAUSTIS 8 SOVS 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL + 002433 01/16/85 77.28 PAUSTIS & SONS 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL ok - - - --------- - --- -- 78.96._ • _� --- f f • • . • - + ** -CKS li � r - 1985;C►.. OF EDINA CiMECK REGISTER 01 -21 -85 PAGE 3 CHECK NO. DATE - _ _- AMOUNT ^_ V =NDOt _ _ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT _N0. - INV._U P.O._0_MESSAGE - -. 002442 0.1/14/85 129997.42 - PHP EMP.NOSPITALIZATION__. -_- 10-,41.56-5.10-51 MANUAL y `' 129887.42 * # # #rff OU.2451 0.1/16185 5.31 -. OJALITr WIVE 5D- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 002451 0.1/16/85 - - - 1.17 _ QUALITr1 WINE _ 50- 3710 - 842- 84 MANUAL 002451 0.1 / 16 /85 6.40. OUeLI Tr VINE - 50- 3710 - 842 -84 _ -_- - - MANUAL 00,2451 [1/16185 2.10• OUALITV W INE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 002451 u1/16/85 - B.57- _ QUALITY WINE _ _ - 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL OQ2451 0.1/16/85 1.61 QUALITrl WINE _ -_ - _ -50- 50-3710-862-86--------- MANUAL 00.2451 0.1/16/85 1015- QUALITY WIN_ 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 002451 01/16/85 _ .51 -_ _ QUALITr' WINE __- 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 00,2451 D.1 /16/85 951 _. _ QUALITY, WIVE -_ 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL CO2451 01/16/85 .51 QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 00.2451 01/16/85 -- - - -T 55.00- - 0JALITr1 WIVE - _ - -- - - 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 002451 01/16185 265.75 QUALITII WINE -_50- 50 -4628- 822 -82 _ - -- MANUAL CU2451 01/16/85 105000 OUALITr' WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 002451 4.1116185 428.65 - -- - QUALITY WINE - - - - _ ..-._ _------------.-- 50- 4628- 842 -84 _ MANUAL- 00.2451 G.1/16185 320.10 OJALITr WIVE - - -- -- 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 002451 01/16/85 25.30 QJALITV VINE 50- 4628- $62 -86 MANUAL 002451 01/16/85 _ _ 25.81- - OUALITY WINE_ _ _. 4628 - 862 -86 002451 01/16/85 57.84 QUALITr'WINE _ -__50- _ 50- 4628- 862 -86 _.- .___..MANUAL - MANUAL OC,2451 0.1/16185 8[.54- QUALITY WIPE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 002451 0.1/16/85 - - _ 25.30_- OUALITr_ MINE• • • - - _ - -- - - - - -- - -- -- 504628- 862 -86 MANUAL 995.48 • - -- _- _ _- KS 00,2540 01/16/85 5.25- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 002540 ^1/16/85 _ -----262 . F0 _ _ TWIN CITY WINE ,- -.. ___ _• _______ ________ 4628 - 842.84.___. , MANUAL UD2540 U1/16/85 3.03 TWIN CITY WINE __ _ - __50- 50- 4628 - 842 -84 -_. MANUAL 263.55 # _ - - r+f -CKS 0 0.9'5 22 0.1/14/85 - -- - -- 89163.92 _ AMOCO. ,OIL - - -- - GASOLINE -- 10 -4612- 560- 56- MANUAL' 89163.92 • - __.___ 00.8716 01/14/85 300 .?0 U S POSTM &STER POSTAGE DUE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 MANUAL . 300.70 + # # # # ## f+f -CKS 017091 01/14/85 1�500.OD- CITY OF E0I'NA T TRANSFER - -- 10 -1139- 000 -00 - -- MANUAL- 19500.00 + rrr -CKS 0110.15 - _ 0.1 /14/85_ - -.- 13.37 _ - - -AT_. B . T _ _TELEPHONE - 1.0- 20,10- 000 -00 MANUAL 011015 0.1/14/8'. 92.02 AT 9 T TELEPHONE 20- 2010- 000 -00 _ - -_ MANUAL 011015 01/14/85 44.93 AT R T TELEPHONE 23- 2010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 1985 CITY OF EDINA 909000000 1ST SOUTH]ALE CHECK REGISTER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 01 -21 -85 PAGE 4 CHECK NO. DA TE _ ___ _ AMOUNT _ __. _ VENDOR_._ _ ...-.---.ITEM DESCRIPTION.._.,__ - _ACCOUNT.. NO*.- I NV.._.1f _P *0. M MESSAGE 011:'.15 01/14/85 64.78 AT R T TELEPHONE 27- 2010 - 000 -00 MANUAL •.. * ** 214.40 * ** -CKS * * * * *• 01/14/85 19695.68 MI NNE G A'S C0 HEAT 10- 2010- 000 -00 •** -CKS U11018 01/14/85 13.05 A T S p TELEPHONE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 011018 01/14/85 4.50 A T i T TELEPHONE 20- 2010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 111018 01/14/85 21.74 A T & F TELEPHONE 28- 2010 - 000 -00 MANUAL' 011354 01/14/85 39.29 _MINV= GA'SSCOw__ -__ _, . __._ _HEAT MANUAL * ** * ** -- - -- - -- *** -CKS 011114 01/14/85 909000000 1ST SOUTH]ALE BANK TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 011174 01/14/85 _.. 909000.33- 1ST SOUTHDALE_ -.BANK TRANSFER._5Q -1010- 000 -00 MANUAL ' .00 • •.. * ** * ** -CKS 011354 01/14/85 19695.68 MI NNE G A'S C0 HEAT 10- 2010- 000 -00 MANUAL 011354 01/14/85 _ 1343.97 MINNEGASCO -_ __. HEAT- _ 10 -2010- 000 -00 MANUAL 011354 01/14185 39203.89 MINN_GASCO HEAT 10- 2010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 011354 ^.1/14/85 89353.15 MINYEGASCO HEAT 10- 2010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 011354 01/14/85 19925.87_.__ _MINV= GA'SSCOw__ -__ _, . __._ _HEAT MANUAL 0,11354 01/14185 22.13 MILAN= GXSS:O HEAT 20 -2010- 000 -00 MANUAL 011354 0.1114/85 297.16 MINN_GASCO HEAT 23- 2010- 000 -00 MANUAL 011354 0.1/14/85 _ 3.)) _ MINYEGASCC HEAT _ ------- __ _ ___ 26- 2010 - 000 -00 MANUAL U11354 01/14/85 201.16 MILAN= GASS :O HEAT 27- 2010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 011354 1/14/85 797.15 MINNEGASSCO HEAT 27- 2010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 011 354 01/14/85 , .. 5 9909.1 7__ _ _._ _ MINNEGA SCO - _ _ -_ . _ HEAT _- 28 -2010- 000 -00 ..._ MANUAL 0,11354 C.1/14/85 3,34509 MINN_GECSCO HEAT 30- 2010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 011354 01/14/85 333.55 MINNEGASCO HEAT 40- 2010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 011 354 01/14/85 _ .__ _ 356.80 _ MINV =GCSCO . HEAT - _- _ _ 50- 2010 - 000 -00 _ MANUAL 011354 01/14/85 382.22 MIN4EGASC9 HEAT 50- 2010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 011354 01/14/85 405.59 MINVEGASCO MEAT 50- 2010 - 000 -00 MANUAL ___ _ __28576.4 -9_• _ -_ •.* * *• * ** -CKS 011396 01/14/85 54.05 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 011396 )1/14/85 92.20 NORTiW_ST_IN BELL HEAT 10 -2010- 000 -00 MANUAL 011 396 U1/14/85 _.3,185.92 NORT14EST_RN BELL TELEPHONE_ _ 10- 2010 - 000 -00 _._ MANUAL 011396 U1/14/85 60.25 NORTHWEST ERN BELL TELEPHONE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 011396 1/14/85 19.45 NORTiW_ST_RN BELL TELEPHONE 20- 2010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 011 396 01/14/85 ._1,475.23 NTO PT-1 WEST_RN BELL TELEPHONE -_ _ _ 20- 2010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 011396 ]1/14/85 131.37 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 23 -2010- 000 -00 MANUAL 011396 01/14/85 12.75 N ?RT4JEST_RN BELL TELEPHONE 26- 2010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 011 396 01/14/85 _. _ __ __ „__333.90 __- NORTHWEST--RN BELL __- TELEPHONE _________- ___27- 2010- 000 -00 _ MANUAL U11396 01/14/85 335.57 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 28- 2010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 011396 01/14/85 46.98 NORTiAEST_2N BELL TELEPHONE 29- 2010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 011396 01 /14 /85 210.30 N'IRTHWEST_R N BELL TELEPHONE -._. __.. _._ ._.. _ 30- 2010 - 000 -00 MANUAL U11396 J1/14/85 96.30 NORTHWESTERN BELL HEAT 40- 2010- 000-00 MANUAL 0.11396 01/14/85 137.10 NORTHWESTERN BELL HEAT 50- 2010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 011396 01/14/85 _ _ _ 178.53 NORTHWESTERN BE LL.- ' HE4T 50-2010-000-00 MANUAL 0.11396 ?.1/14/85 128.37 NORT41WEST_.RN SELL HE4T 50- 2010 - 000 -00 MANUAL, 69504.17 • e 1985 :Cl J- EDINA CHECK RL,.oTER 01 -21 -85 PAGE 5 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT ITEM -DESCRIPTION,----.-- ACCOUNT N0._ INV. O.P.O._#- MESSAGE **t -CKS 011430. 0.1/14/85 12,740.28 PERA EMP PERA CCNT 10- 4145 - 510 -51 MANUAL, 129740.28 * * ** -CKS 011523 01/14/85 59034.87 SOCI %L SECURITY EMP FICA CONT 10- 4149 - 510 -51 MANUAL. 59034.37 * * ** -CKS U21 UO3 :,1 / ^8 /85 13.11 ALBINS34 BLUE PRINTING 10- 2010 - 000 -00 021003 01108/85 296.45 ALSINSON BLUE PRINTING 10- 2010 - 000 -00 U21103 01/08/85 26.50 ALBINSON GEV SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 336.05 + 021304 CA /11/85 10.45 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 2010 - 000 -00 02170.4 01/11/85 121.95 AMT RICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 2010 - 000 -00 LIZ 100.4 0.1/11/85 198.36 AMERI :V1 -INEN LAUNDRY 10- 2010- 000 -00 U21U04 C.1 /11/85 11.30 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 20 -2010- 000 -00 U219Q4 0.1/11/85 47.52 AMERICAN -INEN LAJNDRY -. _._ -. 50 -2010- 000 -00 U21J0.4 (i1/11/85 46.10 AMERICAN LINE! LAUNDRY 50- 2010 - 000 -00 021:,14 01/11/85 63.93 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50- 2010 - 000 -00 499.61 * ** -CKS 021007 01/08/85 22.00 APEX PEST CONTROL GEN SUPPLIES 28 -2010- 000 -00 22.00 02130.8 U1/10/85 93.13 KAMAN BEA2ING & SPLF PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 U21UC8 J1/10/85 49.00 KAMAN B =ACING & SPLY REPAIR PARTS 27- 2010 - 000 -00 142.13 • * ** -CKS 021)13 01/10./85 75.70 ALTERNATOI REBUILD REPAIR PARATS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 021013 U1 /10/85 46.65 ALTE1N41T03 REBUILD REPAIR PARATS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 121.65 • .r.... * ** -CKS 021015 J1 /0.8/85 72.70 AT & T IN=O SYSTEM TELEPHONE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 72.00 + t.If1. * ** -CKS 021020 C1 /10/85 93.40 AIR iYDRAULIC SYSTEM REPAIR.PARTS _ 10- 2010 - 000 -00 93.40 • r.►frf * ** -CKS 021924 01/08/85 9.75 ARTISTAT INC PRINTING 23- 2010 - 000 -00 ^ " 1935 czTv o= cozmx cuccn ncsznrsn 01~21~85 pxsc u m CHEC K NO*.uATE-. ���������S-C.RI.PTI-LN___ �C-QU -Oo-tt AEsoxGE ' � p°ro ° ~ °°°~Cxm � * � 021028 _ 01/10/85 33.6 oEcn-wxoL_rnuLcnS _ mwcm�na 27-.2o1V~0Vo~00_____________ 021 J 2 ul /,u,on 1,727.9D aEcn u*oL--oxLcao xmncmrnnn so~oOvu~ouU~on ip 02,u29 0.1/10v85 39893.50 uccn wwoLEmxLces zwxcmToav 50~2010~000~00 � uavuao _01/11/85 2,466.90 ---_---OccR_uom������um'--'_'- _-zm��mTo�� --5V-2]�|0.0QU~oo--_--__- - 8,121.95 ° * ° -°°"cmS , noousn n`vnoxos 50.55 ocnmrnnn rmuonzms zmwcmroRY 50~*626~822~82 ~ 021 J33 u1v15/85 36°19______acmmrono rmucnzms zwwcm7onv_5n_46o6~moo~oa__ pc,uon 21/15/85 8100 ocmGrupo rowcnzms zmwcm7onv 50 4626-842-84 * 021 U33 ov/ouvun osm°vs osnn`nao raucnIww rwvcmTonv nm~*eaa~o4o~m* ^ 0e1333 _ulv15x85 4°s3.ncnaFVno_ TRUCKING INVENTORY 5V-46o6~ma2~ma_____ uavnso u,/nnxxn 334.95 acas--unm 7nucmzms zmwsmvmmv 50~4626~862~86 w 6**.25 ^ ^ * °^^~ons v w VzIgou_-_ 4.1 /15/85 IUJ.00 dQIL]ER--_---___-' 1on°un ° » * °°°~cxo m nu1 353 � ommvf8 5 39.64 BnnwwIm3 "-mnzo ncrumc CoLuccrzom 10~2010~000~00 w nzoonn 01111f85 96 961________8mnwm1la-!cwnzs_________Rc'usE_c-PLLcICIzom---____10-2010~000~00 ________-__ U21 053 0.1/11/85 sa°oa oxowxzxG Fsnnzo mcpuoc CoLmccrzom 10~2010~000~00 n ucxa.5s ulm1r85 96.61 emnwxzws rEnRzn ncpusc CwLLccrzow 10~2010~030~00 . * 021053 01x11v85 7-o.oVBROWNING rcnnzm REFUSE J:mLLccr ION _-___'2V~2ovo~oo0~0o____ navmoy 61/11x85 .vr uxowvz#s rcnnzy ncrumc CnLmccTznw 20~2010~000~00 v 0.211.53 01m1/85 *°ra nxouvzqn rEnnzo ncruoc cpLLccrzmm 23~2010~000~00 * 021353 ����`/o�oo.*menouxzws_�sxnz� __ ___ncruac cuLcEcT.zom______-27~2010~000~00 02105 01/11/85 19.26 oxywmTNu rsanzs mcrwac coLcccrznm _______ 27~20lo~oma~oo w 021353 01x11/85 134.33 onnwxznG TEmxIs mcFuoE cmLLccrsmm 23~2010~030~00 * ouvoos a�vv1xns _ so�.uV ____ennwnzVo_FE - nzo _-_---__RE�uSc-CALLccJ%qm--__-_nnr2A1o~ooU~no___ . no�uny ��,vxmn 0.1111f85 285°64 enouwzms rcnnzu acrwwc COLLECTION _ 50~2010~000~00 m x,xsr.n« ° * °°°~cxo � w 021058 01/151e5 -_- 1oo.00wwvm�-��moc�r _-_ - PnLJCc_oc»wxcs_-S_-_-_'_-�xD_�A_toV~42_0~42____-__ vOo.00 ^ ' w --_-_'----___-__'_-___----°°°~Cno � 021013 0111Iv85 18.n5 cIrr mccn Imwcmrnnn 50~2010~000~00 m ozvJry 91v10x9 5 _____nz.vm_ _ _CITY acsn__'_'______-'-zwxcw TORY 50-2010~000~00 oz,nrs 01v15v85 15°25 Cl TV oDcn xmvcmrOwv _____ 50~2010~000~00 » � 67.00 ° m ^ u21014 --- --01/10v- CITY -OF-860nMINiTom------KEVjE[_SER 10-000-00------'--'---'--- -- -- 221°00 � 1985 1, C. OF EDINA HECK Rt-_.$TER 01 -21 -85 PAGE 7 r ' CHIECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VEVDOU ITEM _DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT .NO. - ,INN.- 11__P.O. A. MESSAGE 021075 01/16/85 4.30 CLANCY JRJG INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010- 060 -00 021775 01/16/85 4.45 CLANCY DRJG INC _ PHOTO SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 021C75 7.1/16/85 5 *38 CLANCY -3 R'JG INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010- 000 -00 U21075 01/16185 28 *49 CLANCY DQJG INC GEN SUPPLIES 10 -2010- 000 -00 021075 01/16/85 14.48 CLANCY DRUG INC _ GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 57.09 * ** -CKS UZ1078 01/11/85 484.75 COCA C3LA BOTTLING CONCESSIONS 28- 2010 - 000 -00 021078 01/11/85 378.40 COCA COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY _ _ 50- 2010 - 000 -00 U21078 J1/10/85 778.25 COCA COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50- 2010 - 000 -00 L'21018 J1/15/85 256 *60 COCA COLA 30TTLING INVENTORY 50- 2010- 000 -00 1.898.00 • ' -- - - * +* -CKS 021082 0.1/15/85 31.75 CONVAl FIRE 8 SAFETY EQUIP MAINT 10 -2010- 000 -00 31.75 * rR••fr * ** -CKS 021087 0.1/10/85 657945 CUATIV MATH SCI LAB EQUIP _ - 10- 2010 - 000 -00 U21087 J- 1106/85 49.32 CJRTIN MATH SCI GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 021087 01/10185 224.52 CURTIN MATH SCI GEV SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 U21U87 U- 1/10/85 45.20 CURTIN MATH SCI GEV SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 482 -48 976.49 * ** -CKS 021)90, 01/10/85 29.99 CERT POYE1 TRAIN REPAIR PARTS 10 -2010- 000 -00 021090 U1/10185 235. ?4 C=RT POWER TRAIN REPAIR PARATS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 021J90 01/10/85 531 *75 CERT POWER TRAIN REPAIR PARATS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 021)90, 01/10185 235.84 CERT POWER TRAIN REPAIR PARATS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 19033.43 + - rf• *r* * ** -CKS 021094 0.1/0.8/85 145.00 CAST REGISTER SALES GEN SUPPLIES 23 -4504- 611 -61 145.00 * rR••rR * * +- CKS U21097 01/11/85 50.00 COURTN =Y WAYNE REGISTRATION 10- 4202 - 140 -14 5 ^.00. rt•rrr * ** -CKS 0211 ?.6 01/15/85 100.00 DAHL- MR_.41ILOING POLICE SERVICES, 10- 4100 - 420 -42 100.00 * " *•r *r* 021117. u1/16/85 645.70 OAVI)SEV DT!ST INC INVENTORY 50- 2010- 000 -00 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -21 -85 PAGE 8 HECK NO. DATE -..AMOUNT - .- VEND02 - -,_ _.ITEM. DES.CRI,PTIQN_- __- ACCQUNT -N0. INV.- # P.O..# MESSAGE U1111rl. 0.1/15/85 160.30 OAVI)SEN JI'ST INC INVENTORY 50 -2010- 000 -00 806.00 • fr +taf + +f -CKS 021125 0.1/78/85 243.05 MERIT EUPllLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 28 -2010- 000 -00 021125 01/15/85 253.41 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 28 -4512- 708 -70 021125 01/15/85 59.70 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES_ -__ 28- 4512 - 708 -70 556.15 • • f f f f i rrf -CKS 0.21130. 01/08/85 17.43 DUNE BUGGY SUPPLY CONT REPAIRS 28- 2010 - 000 -00 17.40 • 021131 0.1 /11185 282.35 ASPLJND COFFEE CONCESSIONS 28- 2010 - 000 -00 021 131 Cl/11/85 - _ _ 750.33 - . ASPLUND COFFEE __- CONCESSIONS 28- 2010 - 000 -00 011131 0.1/11/85 354.45 ASPLJVO CJFFEE CONCESSIONS 28- 2010 - 000 -00 021131 0.1/08/85 44.25 ASPL'JN)' CJFFEE CONCESSINS 28- 2010 - 000 -00 19431 .39 • + ►* -CKS 021136 01/10/85 93.10 EARL F A'ND -RSEN SIGNS E POST 10- 2010 - 000 -00 93.10 + •••fff - -- ff• -CKS 0.21139 0.1/0.8/85 _ -_ - __ -_477. P,2 _ EDIN4 ELECTRIC C9_ .. -- ..._CDNT REPAIRS- _- _- -_ -28. .-201,0- 000 -00 477.82 -- f •. t•• - -- - --- - - -`- - " ----` - +ff -CKS 021146 '1/08/85 29019.44 GREEV ACRES SPKL CONT SERVICE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 29019.44 • - -_ +ftfi f + ++ -CKS 021148 01/10/85 27.61 ELVIV SAFETY SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 10 -2010- 000 -00 27.61 • ff +-CKS 021154 01/10/85 119.70 JOE ELIAS HEALTH.COVERAGE _. ___10 -4156- 510 -51 119.70 . • • • • f • - ---- - - - - -- - - - -- -- - - - _ - -- - - - - - -- ..f -CKS s 021156 01/10/85 31.10 FeIRVIEa IOSPITAL EQUIP RENTAL 10- 2010 - 000 -00 rf f f f f + +* -CKS 021159 01/16/85 19355905 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL C GEN SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 19955.35 • t L 1985'CITY 0= E0INA CHECK REGISTER 01 -21 -85 PAGE 9 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR _ ITEM DESCRIPTION _- __ACCOUNT NO* INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE •r• +rr * ** -CKS U21133 :.1/C8/85 15.29 GIVEVS IN: GEV SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 646 -64 15.29 + r•►rr+ * *+-CKS 021194 x.1/10/85 87.95 GEN =IAL CIMMUNICATNS CONT SERV 10- 2010- OOD -00 021194 U1/10185 19.70 GENEZAL COMMUNICATNS EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 301 -30 L21194 0.1/10/85 100.130 GENEZAL CJMMJNICATNS RADIO SERV _- 10- 4294 - 420 -42 021194 01/15/85 377.50 GENEZAL COMMUNICATNS RADIO SERV 10- 4294 - 440 -44 021194 U1/10/85 266.25 GENEZAL COMMUNICATNS RADIO SERV 10- 4294 - 560 -56 843.70 + 99.99• 6**-CKS 021205 01 /10/85 353.70 G B K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10- 2010 - 000 -00 U21236 U1/ ^13195 523.66 G B K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10- 2010- 000 -00 U21206 J1/10185 44.00 G 8 K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10 -2010- 000 -00 0-21205 31/08185 219.11.5 G B K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10- 2010 - 000 -00 U21206 01/10/85 536.75 G 8 K SEPVICES LAUNDRY 10- 2010 - 000 -00 U21 206 U 1 /C8 /8 5 35.20 G B K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10- 2010- 000 -00 U.21206 01/10/85 252.75 G 8 K SERVICES _ _ _ _- - LAUNDRY _ 20- 2010 - 300 -00 021206 01/08/85 202.20 G R K SERVICES LAUNDRY 20 -2010- 000 -00 L21206 71/10/85 116.50 G R K SEPVICES LAUNDRY 30- 2010 - 000 -00 021206 .^.1/08/85 93.23 G 3 K SER /ICES LAUNDRY 30 -2010- 000 -00 U212U6 01/08/85 80.53 G 8 K SERVICES LAUNDRY 40- 2010 - 000 -00 021206 01110/85 136.30 G & K SERVICES _LAUNDRY _ __40- 2010 - 000 -00 29703.54 r 021207 01/08/85 19359.75 GRIGGS BErl INVENTORY _- 50- 2010 - 000 -00 021277 U1/08/85 2,212.PD GRIGGS 3E_R INVENTORY 50- 2010 - 000 -00 021207 01/15/85 1,140.45 GRIGGS BE =R INVENTORY 50- 2010 - 000 -00 49713.33 •. r.rr*• ' - * ** -CKS U21239 1,1/11/85 115.68 G =NU14E PURTS GEN SUPPLIES 28- 2010- 000 -00 • 115.68 * +•*r +r .- - -- - - - -- - _. ... __ .. - - **-C KS 021213 01/C8/85 120.0 +0 L =ROY H LIBBY CONT SERV 40- 2010 - 000 -00 021213 0.1/08/85 121.70 LEROY H LI38T CONT SERV 40- 4200 - 800 -80 240.00 + ff+*+r * ►*-CKS 011228 01/15/85 233.70 HILLSTROM AUTO SJP Y ROAD EQUIP 10- 2010 - 000 -00 011228 ul/15/85 23U.JU- HILLSTROM AUTO SUP Y CORRECTION 10 -2010- 000 -00 U212219 01/15185 29300.33 HILLSTROM AUTO SUP Y R04D EQUIP 10 -2010- 000 -00 29300.10 + *•fr•+ **r -CKS 1985 CITY OF EDINA C4EC K NO. DATE 021234 '11/15/85 f r r 4 f f 021244 01/10185 021244 J1/10/85 021245 01/15/85 f i f i i f 021249 01/15/85 v f r f f f i U21 217 U21 219 U21 279 U21 2/9 021219 021279 UZ1219 021 219 021 219 C.21 219 021 279 OZ1 279 011 219 021 279 021 219 021 219 U21 279 U21 279 U21279 L21 279 021 2/9 021 279 021 279 U21 279 021 219 021279 U21279 ',21219 f f f i i i AMOUNT_- __ . _.. 11.)0 11.00 i 20.05 59.1) 79.25 • 21.60 21.67 i 1oo.eo 100.90 • CHECK REGISTER 01 -21 -85 PAGE 17 4EN00Ri_ ITEM DESCRIP..TION _. .. __.._.ACCOUNT N0. INV. -R P.O. # MESSAGE HOOTE4 CLEANERS LAUNDRY _ 10- 2010 - 000 -00 MAYDEN MU2DHY REPAIR PARTS 10 -2010- 000 -00 HAYDEN MURPIHY REPAIR PARTS_ 10- 2010 - 000 -00 ROBERT _8 -HILL WILLIAM H)FFMAN POLICE SERVICES 10 -4100- 420 -42 U1/10/85 241.70 CARLSON PRINTING GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 241.70 J1/C18/85 15.29 JERRYS = OD) S PHOTO SUPPLIES 27- 2010 - 000 -00 15.29 • 1/10/85 54.28 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GE4 SUPPLIES 10 -2010- 000 -00 U1/10/85 2.45 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 01/10/85 -_. _ _ . -_ __. 57.41 _. JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE _ GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00_ 01/10/85 36.15 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 070 -00 )1 /1D/85 22.96 JTRRfi OUR OWN HOWE GE4 SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 L1/10/85 50.23 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES _ 10- 2010 - 000 -00 01/10/85 4.50 J --RRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 0'1/10/85 17.36 J'RRrS OUR OWN HO WE REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 01110/85 21.18 JERRYS OUR OWN 110 WE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010- 000 -00 01/10/85 133.45 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 J1/10/85 57.48 JERRYS OUR 0 W HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010- 000 -00 31 /10/85 13.52 J _-RRfS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -70 J1/10/85 103.31 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GE4 SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 01/10f85 92.35 JrRRfS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 61/10/85 66.05 JERRYS OUR OWN HO WE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 01/10/85 68923 JERRYS OUR OWN. HOWE _ REPAIR PARTS - 20 -2010- 000 -00 U1/10/85 123.34 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE PAINT 20- 2010 - 000 -00 1:1/10/85 60.38_ JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES -_ 20 -2010- 000 -00 ?1/10/85 17.69 J-RRrS OUR OWN Hr) WE TOOLS 20- 2010 - 000 -00 J.1/10/85 7.89 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE PARTS 27- 2010 - 000 -00 01/10/85 _- __16.17 __._JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE _TOOLS 27- 2010 - 000 -00.. 01 /10 /85 14.15 J'RRfS OUR OWN HOWE TOOLS 28- 2010 - 000 -00 51/10/85 21.66 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 28 -2010- 000 -00 U1 /10 /85 141 .45 JERRf S OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES ._ - .. -. -_ 28- 2010 - 000 -00 01/10/85 13.64 JERRYS OUR OWN HOW_ REPAIR PARTS 30- 2010 - 000 -00 J1/10/85 6.96 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE. GEN SUPPLIIES 40- 2010 - 000 -00 fii -CK iii -CK3 iai -CKS ir• -CKS 1935 C. JF E7INA CHECK NO. DATE 021289 6.1/15/85 f f t r r f OZ13J0 01/10/85 021300 01/15/85 ffffRr 021302 01/10/85 OZ13J,2 01/15/85 *rr*r• U21 30.4 C 1 /15 /85 f r t t f r OZ1311 01/15/85 021311 U1/08/85 021311 U.1/Q.8/85 *afrra PRODUCTS 021313 •frraa !?1/15/85 AMOUNT 107.3 100. ^0 * 598.)0 561.00 1 9159.11 5 9574.1 6 29891.21 89465.37 * 6.08 6.08 * 29574.25 3 9974.1 0 39635.30 101,184.65 281.45 281.45 CHECK RL .TER 415.80 01 -21 -85 'AGE 11 V_ND02 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. p P.O. # MESSAGE WALTER JOHNSON POLICE SERV 10 -4100- 420 -42 + * * -CK.S K1KES1 ATILETIC GEN SUPPLIES 28- 2010 - 000 -00 KOKES1 ATILETIC GEN SUPPLIES _ 28- 4504 - 708 -70 109.174 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEM SJPPLIES * ** -CKS KJETi =R DIST CO INVENTORY 50- 2010 - 000 -00 LAWS014 KUETHER 0113T CO INVENTORY 50- 2010 - 000 -00 0Z1 317 11/10/85 128.83 LAWS14 4 -CK_ KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 28 -4504- 708 -70 01110185 53 *00 LAWS34 PRODUCTS *** -CKS EASTSID: 3EVERAGE INVENTORY 50- 2010 - 000 -00 453.05 EASTSIDE BEVERAGE INVENTORY 50-2010- 000 -00 10 -2010- 000 -00 EASTSIDE 3EVERAGE INVENTORY 50- 2010 - 000 -00 LAWS34 PRODUCTS - - - 10- 2,010- 000 -00 **r -CKS JOHN H FOSTER REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 U21315 01/11/85 415.80 ANCHOR PAPiER PAPER SUPPLIES 10- 4514 - 520 -52 415.80 021317 0.1/10•/85 109.174 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEM SJPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 0.21317 u1 /10/85 773.24 LAWS014 PRODUCTS SIGNS 8 POSTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 0Z1 317 11/10/85 128.83 LAWS14 PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 021317 01110185 53 *00 LAWS34 PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2710 - 000 -00 0.21 317 01 /10/85 453.05 LAWS34 PRODUCTS SIGNS 6 POSTS 10 -2010- 000 -00 Del 311 U1/10/85 215.53 LAWS34 PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2,010- 000 -00 19732.76 UZ1318 U1/16/85 85 *80 LEEF BROS IN. LAUNDRY 10- 2010 - 000 -00 021318 0.1/16/85 18.00 LEEF BR3S *_NC LAJNORY__.. 27- 2010 - 000 -00 103.80 + __._ rttfri 0,21324 01/16185 674.91 LIGIS BILLIN6 10- 2010 - 000 -00 * **-CKS **#-CKS *** -CKS 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -21 -85 PAGE 12 - CHECK N0. ,DATE A90UNT ___- _____ -__•_. _ V °4.D03 ITEM DESCRIPTION AC- COUNT__N0._INV._.#_P.O. # MESSAGE 021324 J.1/I6/$5 19116.36 LOGIS BILLING 10- 2010- 000 -00 021 324 1.)1/16/85 - 647.35 LOGI3 - _ . BILLING _ _ -- -_ -_ - _ 10 -2010- 000 -00 021324 0.1/16/85 49000.00 LOGI3 BILLING 10 -2010- 000 -00 021324 01/16/85 19782.14 LOGIS BILLING 10 -2010- 000 -00 011324 _ 0.1/16/85 _990.03 LDGI3- �- _ ___- __BILLING- 0.21324 0.1/16/85 29658.27 LOGIS BILLING 10- 4200 - 500 -50 021324 01/16185 916.58 LOGIS BILLING 30- 2010 - 000 -00 021 324 01/16/85 ._ 916.57 -_ LOGIS _ __ -_ _ _ BILLING__. _ __ - -_ ___40 -2010- 000 -00 021324 01/16/85 241.93 LOGIS BILLING 50- 2010- 000 -00 021324 01/16/85 241.92 LOGI3 BILLING 59- 2010 - 000 -00 021324 01/16/85 241. 92 , -_. ._____L3GI.S 9ILLLNO ?0 -2010- 000 -00 149427.98 • tr # #rr 021328 01/10/85 243.50 LAW ENFORCEMENT CO RADIO EQUIP 10- 2010- 000 -00 - - - - -- - - -- 243- .50 - -' - -- -- - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - -- - - #.ff.f # ## -CKS 021331 L'1/10/65 39647.00 LAHASS CORPORATION CAPITOL OUTLAY 10 -2010- 000 -00 „ 39647.00 * *• -CKS r 021 337 U1 /10/85 -_ -__ - 26.58_ -_ -_. LAKE STATE' EQUIP _ _ REPAIR PARATS 10- 2010 - 700 -00 021337 01/10/85 24.62 LAKE STATE EQUIP REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 021337 0.1/10/85 12.67 LAKE STATE EQUIP REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 0[1337 _. -- 0.1/10/85___. 19.99_ _LAKE _STAT= EQUIP_ REPAIR_PARATS 10 -2010- 000- 00_______ -_ 021337 01/10/85 21.91 LAKE STAT= EQUIPi REPAIR PARATS 10 -2010- 000 -00 105.77 # #ff #r # -- - --------- --- - - ---- ---------------- - - - -- -- - -- -- - - -- - - - -. .. # ## -CKS s 021 341 _ -. 01/10/85 -- __ - - -- _5].49 _ _M_ B -I INO_ SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES_ 10 -2010- 000 -00 021341 0.1/10/85 50.4D M B I 114D SUPPLY PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 ;r 100.80 + 021342 u1/10/85 97.67 MAC 9'JEEN _QUIP INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 011342 !].1/10/85 69.79 MAC 9U -EN EQUIP INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010- 000 -00 021342 CJ /10/85 212.71- _. - -_- _- MAC _0U "LYE N EQUIP _INC _- R_E?A�R 1_0- 2010- 000 -00 - - 379.47 • y #.►r ## - -- ### -CKS Y 021344 0.1/15/85 16.12 MED OKYGEI B EQUIP EQUIP MAINT 10- 2010 - 000 -00 021344 _ -94.84 - __MED_DXKGEN R__EOUIP 1ST-ATD SUPPLIES 10- 000 -00 021344 0.1/15/85 33.12 MED 1XM19E4 8 EQUIP 1ST AID SUPPLIES -2010- 10- 2010- ODO -00 - _____ y, 144.08 • #k ► #kf ---- -- ._- ,._.__.._ - -� -_. -._. -- ## #-CKS __021_346_ -_ -•01 /10_/85 39786, 75 MET�J- Yp1SL`__.L -CDNM _p- LpP_ PE�MiiS 10- 210- _Q00 -00 39786.75 * ' _- ti • • f f f # r. b 01 -21 -85 PAGE 13 ITEM DES CRIPTI -ON ___ __A000UNT_.NO.- INV._# P -O- # MESSAGE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 GEN SUPPLIES 30 -2010- 000 -00 GEN SUPPLIES 40- 2010- 000 -00 021359 01/15185 124.71 3M ALARM SERVICE 1985 CITY OF EDINA 021358 ul/11185 CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOt ul/10185 0,21353 021353 021353 01/10/85 ul/10185 X1/10185 31.19 31.00 31.00 93.33 • MINNESOTA MINNESOTA MINNESOTA 3LOVE GLOV? GLOVE b 01 -21 -85 PAGE 13 ITEM DES CRIPTI -ON ___ __A000UNT_.NO.- INV._# P -O- # MESSAGE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 GEN SUPPLIES 30 -2010- 000 -00 GEN SUPPLIES 40- 2010- 000 -00 * **• ** *** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 021359 01/15185 124.71 3M ALARM SERVICE ALARM SERV 23- 4304 - 610 -61 28 -4304- 708 -70 021358 ul/11185 93.49 34 A.ARM SERVICE ALARM SERVICE ALARM SERV 50 -4304- 821 -82 021358 ul/10185 130.63 3M ALARM SERVICE 3M SERVICE ALARM SERV _ 50- 4304 - 861 -86 021358 0.1/10/85 146.79 ALARM 495.53 021359 L "1/10185 16.94 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 2010 - 000 -00 021359 01/10/85 9942 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 26.36 • 021 36) 01/10/85 25.50 MINNESOTA WANK =R REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10 -2010- 000 -00 U21360 :1.1/10/85 114.00 MI NN =SO TA WANNER C04T REPAIRS REPAIR PARTS 40- 2010- 000 -00 021360 01/10/85 18.30 MINNESOTA WANNER 157.5] *i iffi 021363 01/15/85 69.79 MONAICH MIRKING OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 50- 4516- 820 -82 50- 4516- 840 -84 011363 01/15/95 4.31 134.55 HONARCI MA-2KING MONARCi'MERKING .. OFFICE SUPPLIES 50 -4516- 840 -84 021363 :11/10/85 01/10/85 69.00 MONARCi MlRKING OFFICE SUPPLIES 50 -4516- 860 -86 021 36 3 277.35 0.1115/85 100.033 BERT MERFELD POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100- 420 -42 021365 109.90 * 021365 01/10/85 542.17 MINNESOTA BAR INVENTORY PAPER SUPPLIES 50- 2010 - 000 -00 59- 2010 - 300 -00 021366 01/15/85 51.7] MINNESOTA BAR 3AR INVENTORY _ -,,__ 50- 2010- 000-00 021366 j1 /11/85 336.92 MINNESOTA 979.99 • •►: rf r 021370 01/08/85 306.95 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO - CONCESSIONS -_ _... _ _.28 -2010- 000 -00- 306.95 021318 U1 /15/85 4,181.63. MARK Vll SALES INC INVENTORY 50- 2010 - 000 -00 50- 2010 - 900 -00 021379 61/08/85 335.00 MARK V11 SALES INC V11 SALES INC INVENTORY INVENTORY _._. 50- 2010- 000 -00 02131a 61/08/85 5,403.70 4,183.77 MARK MARK V11 SALES INC INVENTORY 50- 2010 - 000 -00 021378 61/11/85 149103.31.' - - * **• ** *** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1935 CITY OF EDINA CH_CK REGISTER 01 -21 -85 PAGE 14 ~ C4ECK NO. DATE AMOUNT - _ V_ NOD R_ _ ITEM DESCRIPTION._ —_ -_- _ACCOUNT NO* INV. _ R P.O. A MESSAGE 021380, 0.1/16/85 17,256.55 TNOMSEN NYBECK S---1 LEGAL 10- 2010 - 000 -00 179256.55 ** ** *r * ** -CKS 021385 0.1/16/85 1 080.33 MCGUIRE 13BERf TREE INSPECTION 10- 1300 - 011 -18 02138'5 121/16/85 243.0D MCGUIREI 13BERT TREE INSPECTION- 10- 4242 - 353 -30 [!21385 01/16/8`. 55000 MCGUIRE1 aOBERT _ TREES PURCHASED _ 10- 4560- 643 -64 1.870.00 t * +t+r *** -CK3 021368 0.1/10/85 16.0 YTL A'TOMIK MOTOR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 C21383 J1/10/85 .58 NTL 1;TJMI( MOTOR REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 16.58 + +rrr+* *** -CKS 021400 01/15/85 19614.60 NORTIRWESTEIN TIRE CO TIRES. 8_- TUBES __- 10- 2010 - 000 -00 1y614.60 *** -CKS 021412 01/08/85 23.33 NN GRAPHIC SUPPLY INVENTORY SUPPLIES 23- 2010 - 000 -00 20.31* 0.21413 01/11/85 365.90 NATIONYID_ PAPERS PAPER SUPPLIES 10- 4514 - 520 -52 _365 .90 +*rrrr * ** -CKS U21417 01/10185 29335.30 OFFSET PRINTT'NG PRINTING 10- 2010 - 000 -00 021417 U1/10/85 197905 r)FFS_T PRINTING PRINTING 30- 4600- 780 -78 - _29232.05 •trtr* * ** -CKS 021429 ul/11/85 166.25 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING. CONCESSIONS 28- 2010 - 000 -00 021429 0.1/08/85 608.70 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50 -2010- 000 -00 OL1429 01/15/85 435+57 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY_ 50- 2010- 000 -00 . U21 42 9 0.1/08/85 189.00 PEPSI CJLA BOTTLING _ _ INVENTORY 50- 2010 - 000 -00 19399.52 ttt*►* - - -- - - r** -CKS 021434 61/10/85 _ __ -_ - -17 .31 - .- _PRINT =1S 37RVICE INC _._ =QUIP MAINT 2010 - 000- 00_____ ♦ U21 43 4 01/10/85 340. ?0 PRINTERS SERVICE IVC ___28- EQUIP MAINT 28- 4274 - 707 -70 -_. 510.:D t*rrrr - --- - - - -- - - --- - -- - -- -- ---- - ---- - -- - **► -CKS 011439 U1/C8/85 _ _— .__49450.63 ___- _PRIOR_LAX_ AG__ -- -_ _ _ SANO.. GRAVEL- ROCK____10- 2010 - 000 -00 021439 0.1/08/85 19493.90 PRI02 LAKE AG SAND GRAVEL ROCK _ 30- 2010 - 000 -00 r 59924.50 • ' ,,ice--- +..• -., � .. . - � - - - .. _ ,_ _ ..- - - ....- , ...... ,- . - . - - -- -� - ----- - - - --- -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- ,1985 'Cl .F EDINA CHECK RL ER r, 01 -21 -85 ,E 15 CHiECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VEVOOI ITEM DESCRIPTION.__ _ _._ACCOUNT N0. INV. ,q P.O. # MESSAGE •ar -CKS 021441 01/08/85 1 ►7.00 THE 2RINT SHOP PRINTING 20- 2010- 000 -00 1 77.7.0 arras • ** -CKS _ 021443 01/08/85 115.13 POMMER 4Fi CO GEV SUPPLIES 10 -2010- 000 -00 0.21443 0l/C8/85 17.79 POM4ER 4Fi CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 132.22 • r.rrra *** -CKS" C.21445 01/1D/85 532.10 PAPER CALHENSON & CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 _ 532.10 .•. *►• -- - ara -CKS 021460. 01/10185 116.10 ROYAL CROWN BEV INVENTORY 50- 2010 - 000 -00 021467 01/11F85 363.20 ROYAL GROWN BEV INVENTORY 50- 2010 - 000 -00 _ 021463. 01/15/85 47.35 ROYAL CROWN BEV INVENTORY 50- 2010 - 000 -00 586.65 021461 01 /C8f85 217.65 REED SALES & SERVICE REPAIR PARTS 27 -2010- 000 -00 (121461 01/08/85 582.62 REFD SALES & SERVICE REPAIR PARTS 27- 2010 - 000 -00 021461 01/10/85 239.73 REED S4-6ES & SERVICE REPAIR PARATS 27 -4540- 662 -66 1.033.00 • 999•.9 -- - War -CKS 021463 U.1/15185 29151.50 REX )IST INVENTORY 0.21463 !;1/15/85 29006.60 REX DIST INVENTORY 50 -2010- 000 -00 021463 01/10/85 2.535.85 REX )IST INVENTORY 50- 2010 - 000 -00 69693.95 a•r.aa * ** -CKS 021467 01/11!85 105.23 ROYAL BEVEIA9E C3 INVENTORY - 50- 2010 - 000 -00 021467 u.1/10185 625.40 ROYAL 3EV =RAGE CO INVENTORY 53- 2010- 000 -00 0.21467 01115/85 247.40 ROYAL BEVEIAGE CD INVENTORY. - __ ___50- 4630- 822 -82 978.07 • •..a•• - . - -- - - -- aaa -CKS 021469 01/10/85 131.47 ROAD MACHINERY REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 131.47 • 021470 01/15/85 25.00 OR RDCKYELL POLICE SERVICES 10 -4100- 481 -48 25.00 021471 01/11/85 50.00 KENNETH E ROSLAND REGISTRATION 10 -4202- 140 -14 57.00 • array• War -CKS 1985 CITY OF EDINA HECK NO. DATE 021479 01/11/85 021470 01/11/65 ffffff 021485 0.21 485 021486 021 486 021 492 021 493 021493 011493 021494 x•214 94 021494 f k f Of * * 021 502 021502 C21 5U2 021502 L21 50.3 021 5(25 021505 021505 t f f ► f } 021 508 021 50,8 U21509 021 5U8 U21508 61/10/85 ;1/10/85 31/16/85 51/10/85 AMOUNT 430.49 206.92 637.41 * 580.60 77.50 658.17 * 12.95 112.)^ 124.95 CHECK REGISTER VE4DOR R 8 R SPECIALTIES R 8 R SP=CIALTIES STAY= 8'LD3..INSP STATE 91-03 I43P DON STREICHER GUNS DON 3TR.EICHER GU4S ITEM_ DESCRIPTION CONT REPAIRS CONT REPAIRS BLDG PER BITS SUR CHG TAX AMMUNITION AMMUNITION 01 -21 -85 PAGE 16 ACCOUNT NO* INV* N P.O. # MESSAGE 28- 2010 - 000 -00 28- 2010 - 000 -00 - * ** -CKS 10 -2010- 000 -00 19-2010-000-03 10 -4572- 420 -42 10- 4572 - 422 -42 0.1/10/85 3.90 SOUTROALE FDRD REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 3.90 • U1/C8/85 69306.70 SOUTHSIDE DIST COIN: INVENTORY 50- 2010 - 000 -00 01/15/85 1 *982.75 SOUT -qSIDE )IST CO INC INVENTORY 50- 2010 - 000 -00 01/08/85 - - 180.75 SOUTHSIDE DIST CDI4C INVENTORY - ._ _ -- - - - -- 50- 2010 - 000 -00 - - - -- - 89471.50 01/10/85 19.38 SWEEIEP- BROS TRACTOR _ REPAIR PARTS _ 10- 2010- 000 -00 u1/10/85 14.57 SWE_4 =1 B °OS TRACTOR REPAIR PARTS 10 -2010- 000 -00 ()1/10/85 3.56 SWEE4EY BROS TRACTOR REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 37.51 01/10/85 32.86 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 0.1/10/85 7.44 SUBU13A -4 CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 0.1/10185 21.17 SUBU13CY CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS __ 10- 2010 - 000 -00 51/10/85 24925 SUBUrRB11N :HEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10 -2010- 000 -00 85.72 X1/10/85 47.61 SUBUIBA;4 3LUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 47.61 0.1/ ^8/85 98.75 SUN 4DVERTISING 10- 2010 - 000 -00 !11/10/35 86.86 SUN ADVERTISING 10- 4210 - 140 -14 01/16/85 11.39 SJN ADVERTISING 10- 4210- 140 -14 197.79 • 01/10/85 2.16 ST PAJL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES - 10- 2010 - 000 -00 u1/15/85 18.54 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 01/10/85 _ 7.39 _._ - ST DAUL -BOOK GEN_ SUPPLIES------------ 10-2010-000-00 01/15/85 12.13 ST P%JL BOOK SEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 0.1/10/85 263.86 ST PAUL BO)K GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 * * *-CKS * ** -CKS * **-CKS *•* -CKS 1985 lIT, r EDINA CHECK REG.-._R 01 -21 -85 4: 17 J HECK NO. DATE AMOJNT V =w)0 ITEM DESCRIPTION- - _ - -- ACCOUNT NO.. INV..O -P.O. 4 MESSAGE 021508 7.1/10/85 3.30 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 021508 0.1/08/85 7.20 Si PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 0215C8 J.1/10,/85 25.20 - ST PAUL BOOK CREDIT 10- 2010 - 000 -00 021508 01/10/85 36.56 ST DAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 021508 01/10/85 3504 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 U2157,8 u1 /1Of85 77.95 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010- 000 -00 021508 CAf10 /35 3.45 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 .12150? 01/10185 32.40 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 U215018 01/10185 51.55 ST 24JL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010- 000 -00 021508 0.1/10/85 25. °0- ST :14UL BOOK CREDIT 10- 2010 - 000 -00 021509 01/10/85 3709 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010- 000 -00 021508 61/15/85 6.72 Si 3AUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 260 -26 021508 J.1/10f85 40.25 ST PAJL B)OK GEV SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 021508 iil /10/85 4131 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 421 -42 021508 0.1/15/85 18.30 ST PAUL B70K GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 440 -44 U2150.8 u.1/15/85 7.14 ST PAUL B)OK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 r 021508 L.1/15/85 209.32 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES _- .. 10- 4504 - 510 -51 U21509 u1108/85 8167 Sf 34;UL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLIES 20- 4516 - 600 -60 _ 1121508 0.1/15185 9.32 Si PAUL BOOK INVEN SUPPLIES 23 -1209- 000 -00 021509 01/15/85 2176 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 23- 2010- 000 -00 021508 7.1/15/85 12.81 ST PAUL BIOK GEN SUPPLIES 23- 2010 - 000 -00 021508 U1/15/85 27.31 ST PAUL BOOK INVENTORY 23- 2010 - 000 -00 U2150.8 u1/15/85 34.78 ST 2AlUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES _ 23- 2010 - 000 -00 021508 U1f10185 1018 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 23 -2010- 000 -00 021 5U 01/15/8! 6.72 ST PAUL BOOK INVENTORY SUPPLIES 23 -2010- 000 -00 U21508 .1/10/85 37152 Sf 3A;UL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLIES 27 -2010- 000 -00 021509 71/08185 4.15 Si PAUL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLIES 27- 4516 - 661 -66 021508 u1110/85 1.35 ST PAUL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLIES 27 -4516- 661 -66 967.73 • rfff•• * ** -CKS 021511 0.1/15/85 22.95 SOUTIERIN VACUUM SERV SERVICES 50- 4236- 861 -86 22.95 •rf -CKS 021516 01/1C/85 8.11 SEARS ROEBUCK x- TOOLS 10- 2010- 000 -00 .- 021516 01/10/85 211.99 SEARS ROEBJCK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 021516 01/10/85 74.94 SEARS ROEBUCK TOOLS 10- 2010- 000 -00 021516 01/10/85 64.99 SEARS ROEBUCK OFFICE SUPPLIES 27- 2010 - 000 -00 021516 01/11/85 74.19 SEARS ROEBUCK GEN SUPPLIES 28- 2010 - 000 -00 021516 31/11/85 4.20- SEARS ROEBUCK CREDIT 213- 2010 - 000 -00 021515 31/11/85 177.11 SEARS ROEBUCK GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 708 -70 607.1 3 • r f f f f• , ** *- CK S 0.21542 iu.1108f85 59177.27 THORP= DIST INVENTORY 50- 2010- 000 -00 59177.27 •. frfrf• *** -CKS 0,21548 u1 /CS/85 98.80 THE PRINT SMOP PRINTING 23- 2010 - 000 -00 98.80 1955 CITY 0= EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -21 -85 PAGE 18 CHECK N0. DATE ._ ..._._ _- .__._- AM DUN T-- __ VEND03 IJEM_ DESCRIPTION_ - - -- ACCOUNT- NO.__INV.- _M_PrO. #.MESSAGE ff•ff• ••• -CKS 021567 U1/10/85 80.81 VINC =NT BRASS 8 ALUM REPAIR PARTS 20 -2010- 000 -00 rfr +r• r++ -CKS 021569 U1/08185 486.63 VALLEY IND'PROPANE GASOLINE 28- 2010 - 000 -00 486.63 • fff kff + ++-CKS 021578 01110/85 _ _ _-_.. 9.12. _ __._. WM.H.ZTEGLER_ CO_INC PAIR TS- _-- 10- 2010 - 000- 00.._-_ -.. 9.12 0.21579 01/10/85 „_. 31.63 HILL[ AMS ST_EL -HDWE --.- _.GEN - SUPPf._IES _._ 2010 - 000- 00._____ 021579 01/10/85 225.18 WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE TOOLS .10- 10 -2010- 000 -00 ` 021579 ;11/10/85 184.98 WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -2010- 000 -00 441.79 • •frf►f +•+ -CKS _. 021583 110.28 :110.28 WALD)R ?U4P 3 --QUIP REPAIR PARTS 4D- 2010 - 000 -00 4:4 + +f•• +• ••• -CKS 021590 - _ _ 41 /15/85_ -_____ 1 D3.00 HEURr _Y�03_LESKI_ - -__ POLLEE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 420 -42_ -_ - - -- - fff R•r + +; -CKS J 021592 ..1/16/85 76.80 MID C_NTR1_ FIRE GEV SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 449 -44 4L1592 0. 1/ 11/85857.37 MID CENTRAL _FIRE GEN_ SUPPLIES 10- 4504 -- 646- 64_____ 933.80 _- f•ff•• - - - -- -- -- _ .----- -- -- -- -- -- -- _. ••• -CKS 021596 01/15/85 335.10 TELE - TERMINALS OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 510 -51 335.00 + • + +•rr • ++ -CKS _ 021613 01/10/85 109.70 MCNEILUS STEEL PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 421613 01/10/85 117.50 MCNEILUS STEEL REPAIR PARTS 10.2010- 000 -00 _ 02161.3. _ _ -v 1./10185 -__- 94.37 MC- 4:.ILUS- S_LEE_L _GEN-SUPP -LIES 20n2Q10- 000 -00- _ 321.57 • frrff • - - - - - - -- - -- ---- -- - - -- - - - - - -- -- - - - - --- - ---- - -- --- - -- •r• -CKS 021700 01108/85 T8.00 DAY )IST CJ INVENTORY 50- 2010- 000 -00 _.. - - - -- T8.02 + -_ - -.- -- -- -- - -- -- - 021701 021701 01/C8R5 250900 KEMSSON IVDUSTRIES CONT SERVICES 10 -2010- 000 -00 H ` 19°- 5CITY OF EDINA CHECK RESISTER 01 -21 -85 PAGE 19 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENOO2 ITEM DESCRIPTION___ .__ACCOUNT_ N0.__ INV.. N_ P.O. N - MESSAGE 250.00 021 /0.2 U1/ 08/85 185.7.7 MRP4' DUES 10 -4204- 600 -60 195.00 + 021703 U1/ ^8/85 715.00 ROBEIT C KINGHORN CONSTRUCTION 10 -1424- 000 -00 02170.3 01/08/85 7.31 R39EAT C KINGHORN CONSTRUCTION 10 -1425- 000 -00 721703 U1/(18185 7.30- R09EIT C KINGHORN CORRECTION 10-14 25- 000-00 021703 U1 /C8 /95 737.30 R38EAT C KINGHORN CONSTRUCTION 10 -1425- 000 -00 1x445.33 021104 J110B/85 232.96 HILO_N BUS FORMS GEY SUPPLIES 23- 2010 - 000 -00 021704 J1 /O8/85 330.34 HOLDEN BUS FORMS PRINTING 28 -2010- 000 -00 563.33 U21/0,), 11/08/85 35.10 MARCI4: GERST REFUND SKI LESSONS 20- 2010 - 000 -00 021705 01/08/85 35.30 MARCIA GERST REFUND SKI LESSONS 20 -2240- 000 -00 U2170.5 01/08/85 35.10- MARC 14 GERST CORRECTION 20 -2240- 000 -00 35.30 * J2110.6 31/P8/85 15 ?.J'] NATIONAL 3CREE4PRINT GEN SUPPLIES 28- 2010- 000 -00 157.]7 * U2170.7 01/08/85 3400 AUDI) GROJP A6YERTISIN6 50- 4214 - 822 -82 021107 U1 /^s3 /85 3400 AUDIO GROJ21 ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 862 -86 69.10 * _ U21 /n,8 U1/08/85 31.50 LOUIS C A3RA4AM MILEAGE 30- 4208 - 787 -78 31.60 + 0217!19 01/08/85 749.51 Ism EQUIP RENTAL 10 -2010- 000 -00 749.51 02171 ^., U1 /f8/85 145.00 JERIFS LA4DSCAPEE CONT REPAIRS 50 -2010- 000 -00 145.00 • _ 021711 01/08/85 521.10 RETAIL DATA SYSTEM SERV CONT = 10 -4288- 510 -51 021111 J1 /C8/85 19064920 RETAIL DATA SYSTEM SERV CONTRACTS 50- 4288- 822 -82 0.21711 01/08/85 29038.30 RETAIL DATA SYSTEM SERV CONTRACTS 50- 4288 - 842 -84 021711 01/08/95 19551.00 RETAIL DATA SYSTEM SERV CONTRACT 50- 4288 - 862 -86 59174.00 021712 0.1/08/85 25.00 SESAC I14C LICENSES 28 -2010- 000 -00 25.00 * _ 021113 01/08/85 160000 82043 :47ST MUSIC INC LICENSES 28 -4310- 708 -70 163.30 + 021714 01 /0P /85 2ft908 DALE LUNDGREN MILEAGE ARENA 28- 2010 - 000 -00 28.98 • U21715 U1 /CS/85 101.00 WALL STIRE T JOURNAL SUBSSCRIPTION 10- 4204 - 140 -14 101.0 o ...r.. • * + -CKS 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -21 -85 PAGE 22 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT UENDOt_ ITEM DESCRIPTION___ -_ ,,.ACCOUNT NO., INV. # P.O. 4 MESSAGE U21117 01/10/85 24.10 PARK MAINT DUES 10- 4204 - 600 -60 24.70 * 021718 01 /10 /85 20159.00 - STADTU9S UNLIMITED REPAIR PARTS - 10- 2010- 000 -00 2.158.3.0 , 021719 01/10/85 29000000 W^HRM4•d CONSJLTANTS CONSTRUCTION 10 -2010- 000 -00 29000.00 UZ1720 J.1 /10/85 36.10 RUTH E_:LEd REFUND .ART CENTER 23- 3500 - 000 -00 . 36.00 • 921721 J1/10/85 21.70 SINDIA VIL3UR REFUND ART CENTER__ 23- 3500- 000 -00 21.00 • 021722 01/10/85 _ _ _ 18.00 ELIS= FARdUM REFUND-ART CENTER_ _23. -3500- 000 -00 18.'0 • 021723 U1 /10/85 18.00 LORI R4DM =R REFUND ART CENTER 23- 3500 - 000 -00 18. ^0 . 021 724 31/10/85 _ _ _ 18.00 _ _ _-KAY, 4CMAINS REFUND ART CENTER 3500- 000- 00__._ 18.00 _ __- _,__23- 021725 01/10/85 18.00 BONNIE. SCIANZENBACH REFUND ART CENTER- 23- 3500 - 000 -00 19.00 • 021726 31/10/85 - _ _ 20.00 -_ _ _ DAM ?IELTI . _I4ST_4RT_CENTER.- ___ 20.OD • -__. __21-4100-614-61 r 021727 01/10/85 192.10 PHYL HAYW4 INST ART. CENTER 23- 4100- 614-61 192.10 • 021728 01/10/85 _ ._ 16 ^.00 _ MARGARET GUST INST ART .CENTER 23- 4100 - 614 -61 160.00 • (121729 01/10/85 53700 JUDY LIEBE2 INST ART-CENTER 23- 4100 - 614 -61 537.30 • _ 021730 01/10/85 588.30 SUSAN =RAMS - INST ART.CENTER __- _ 23 -4100- 614 -61 588. 33 • 021731 01/10785 550.1-0 BETTY HOOD INST ART CENTER _ - 23- 4100 - 614 -61 557.33 • 021132 U1/10185 48.47 _ DEPT OF PROPERTY TAI(_ -_- _POSTAGE___10 -2010- 000 -00 48.47 021733 01/101/85 96. ?O STATE TREASURER PLANTING__& TREES---- 96.3D 021734 01/1078' 1 v452.UO . _. -._ __INDUSTRIAL UTILITIES__,. . CON T_REPAIRS-- __40- - 2,010- 000 -00 19452.OD • - Y 021735 01/10/85 _ - 97.52 _ __.._AUTO COM34.4Y _- _.._ REPAIR PARTS___ -___ ___ 10- 2010 - 000 -00 _ 198'51 C. JF EDINA CHECK R, TER 01 -21 -85 jE 21 CIIECK NC. DATE AMOUNT VEyDOV ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. R MESSAGE 97.52 • U21/36 11/1D/85 63.75 POWEI SYSTEMS REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 63.75 • 021137 01/10/85 80.17 AMI GEN SUPPLIES ' 20- 2010- ODO -00 80.17 + 021738 01/10/85 15030 MI C114E "REVELATION MEMBERSHIP 10 -4204- 421 -42 15.00 021139 J,1/10/85 133.30 PTAC PEFORMACE COURSE 10- 4202 - 421 -42 130.10 + 02174. 01/10/85 45.00 Pr ac DEFENSIVE TACTICS 10- 4202 - 421 -42 45.00 021741 01/10/85 225.21 HAROLD SWANSON UNIFORM PURCHASES 10 -4266- 422 -42 225.21 • 021142 01/10/85 63.69 OLIN_ nRa SAFETY EQUIP 10- 2010 - 000 -00 63.69 • 0,21743 01/10/85 384.10 IDENTI KIf COM? EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226- 422 -42 394 00 + 021744 01/10/85 50.00 JOHN WILKIE REFUND ARENA 28- 3415- 000 -00 53.03 • U21145 11/10/85 18D.00 JOHN SCHIRMANG REIMBURSEMENT 10 -4202- 490 -49 021746 01110/85 123.39 BROI(Ok'LE CfgRYSLER REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 121.39 • 021747 01/10185 45.50 KAY SCHL03SER ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 45 .5 0 + U,21 748 11/10/85 6.75 WI4 SOTIEPIIENS BUICK REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 021148 01/10/85 4.70 WIN SDTEPHENS BUICK REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 U21748 01/10/85 25.35 WIN SDTEPHENS BUICK REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 37.30 . _ 021749 01/10/85 6.92 0 & 7 TRUCK REPAIR PARTS 10 -2010- 000 -00 6.92 + - U21750 01/10/85 _ ___.__104.18 _ __ -M R SIGN_: -O _ _ SIGNS &_POSTS 2010 - 000 -00_ 104.18 + , -_ __10- 021751 01/10/85 - 5.89 NORTHERN -POWER PROD REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 5.39 + 0.21752 01/10/85 _ 85.00 -- NELS3N.RADIG_COMM CONT REPAIRS 10-2010-000-00 85.00 _ • 921 755 01/10/85 41.01 CARL3DY EQUIPMENT CO GEN SUPPLIES 10 -2010- 000 -00 1985 CITY 07 EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -21 -85 PAGE 22 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT. .. . V-VDOR ITEM-DESCRIPTION--. NO.. INV. 4 P.O. N MESSAGE _ 41.01 • 021754 J1/10/85 141.31 WILEiSKr AUTn PTS PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 _ 141.31 • 021755 01/10/85 97.30 COP GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 _ 97.30 • U21156 )1/10/85 93.20 AFFILIA:TEI EMERGENCY SERVICES 10- 4224 - 470 -47 90.0 • C21757 01/11/85 985.90 REMINGTON 4•RMS CO RENTAL OF PROPERTY 10- 3230 - 000 -00 985.90 + 021158 J1 /11/85 19098 CONCESSIONS 28- 2010 - 000 -00 13.93 • SCOTSMAN MIDWEST 021(59 1.1/11/85 18.10 AM 94KERIES CO CONCESSIONS 28 -2010- 000 -00 19.10 + U21750, 01/15/85 53.33 HOL4;TEN ICE RINKS GEN SUPPLIES 28 -4504- 708 -70 59.33 + 021761 01/15/85 19.58 LOUIS ABRAHAM MILEAGE 40 -4208- 787 -78 19.68 • 021762 01/15/85 31.10 MAURICE WEBEIT RE --UND 28- 3415 - 000 -00 30.70 • 021763 01/15/$ 321.11 CONSJLTIING EN SERVICES 40- 4220 - 811 -80 321.11 021154 01/15/85 414.36 WALKER CONT SERV 10 -2010- 000 -00 414.36 • 021755 01/15/85 29206.37- STR0 R RD;COE CORRECTION 60- 1300 - 262 -04 021755 91/15/85 2.206.37 STRGA;R R4SC0!: CONSTRUCTION 60 -1300- 262 -04 021765 01/15/85 29206.37 3TRGAR ROSCOE CONSTRUCTION _ 60- 2010 - 000 -00 29206.37 • 021755 )1/15/85 312. 10 FLAKERT(YS INVENTORY_.. -- 50- 2010 - 000 -00 312.) * 021 767 01/15/85 59.00 Rr_SU-_ ROOTER CDNT_ REPAIRS - _ 28- 2010 - 000 -00 59.)7 • 021758 01/15/85 36.82 _ __- __JILL HANSON__.. _.- -- SERVICES.____ 23- 41.00 - 614- 61 36.82 • -__. _ • 021769 U1/15/85 387.76 H^LDEV BUS FORMS PRINTING. 27 -2010- 000 -00 387.76 • U21 770 01/15/85 .__ _ 276.59_ _ -_. ,- _ OZALID COlm _ . -BLUE PRI_NTIN6_-- __.___10- - 4570 - 260 -26 276.59 • 021 771 01/15/85 - 236.55 -- - RTW .INC _ _ -. _CORRECTI.ON . __ ---10-4'260-000-00 ' � nw 1935 Cl F EDINA CHECK RL .R 01 -21 -85 E 23 - r • CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT V_14001 ITEM DESCRIPTION__.., - ACCOUNT NO. INV. A_P.O. # MESSAGE 021771 01/15/85 236.55 RTW IN- INSURANCE 10- 4260- 000 -00 021771 01/15/85 236.55 RTW ING INSURANCE 10- 4260 - 51.0 -51 235.55 + 021772 7.1/15/85 200.25 GMC T2UCK CENTER REPAIR PARTS 10 -2010- 000 -00 200.25 * 021773 0.1/15/85 800.70 JR H EOUIPMENT DEPOT ROAD EOUIF 10- 4912 - 560 -56 - 803.)0 • 721714 01/15/85 43977 MV DEPTi 0= PUBLIC TELETYPE 10- 4268- 420 -42 40.00 + 0.21 775 01/15/85 79.53 MAPLE BOOKS 10- 4502 - 420 -42 79.50 * 021776 01/15/85 64.90 R V ASSOC CLEANING SUPPLIES 10 -4512- 440 -44 64.30 + U21117 j1/16/85 44.74 NTL =IIE 'PROTECTION FIRE PREVENTION 1D- 4650- 440 -44 44.74 + 021/18 01/16/85 75.70 ALL STEEL 2RODUCTS CONSTRUCTION 60- 2010 - 000 -00 75.03 + - _ -- 021779 01/16/8' 129223.75 H.l.M.E. INC JOBS BILL 10- 1139 - 000 -00 129223.15 • 021780, 01/15/85 137.50 JAMES 3.,EH2 - CLOTHING - -- --- -- -- - ... 104266- 440 -44 -- - - - - 1 97.5 9 , - 021781 01/15185 137.50 WM B)WLER CLOTHING 10 -4266- 440 -44 137.50 • 421782 01/15/85 137.50 DENNIS CAIN CLOTHING 10 -4266- 440 -44 1 37.50 + 021783 01/15/85 137.50 RICH %RD HELMER CLOTHING = 10- 4266 - 440 -44 137.50 • 721784 01/15/85 137.50 JAMES JULJOWSKI CLOTHING 10- 4266- 440 744 137.50 + 021785 01/15/85 137.50 STEPHEI LANDRT CLOTHING - 10- 4266- 440 -44 137.50 * 021755 J1/15/85 137.50 ROBE2T LA /SON CLOTHING 10 -4766- 440 -44 137.50 + 021787 01/15/85 137.50 LEROY LISK CLOTHING 10 .-4266- 440 -44 _ 137.50 * U21 188 ut /1S /85 137.50 WM LUTTIS CLOTHIING 10- 4266- 440 -44 137.50 * - - - - .- --- - - - - - -- -- - - -- -- _ .. --- - - -.. U2178-9 01/15/8: 137.50 JOHN MALOIEY CLOTHING 10- 4266- 440 -44 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -21 -85 PAGE 24 v CFFECK_ NO. _DaTE _,.___._•._ AMOUNT,._____.- _ - -_. -- DESCRIPT• IONACCOUNT- NO.- I_NV._Ii.- _P_.0..._t1 -MESSAGE 137.50 + 021790 01/15/85 - -- - - - -- 137. 50 - - - - - - .... RICHARD MYRE - -- - --- - -- - ---- - - - CLDTMING - -- -1 - -- - - - - - -- - - - - -- - 10- 4266 - 440 -44 _ 137.50 • 021791 01/15/85 137.50 JA!McS tL'OBINSON CLOTHING 10 -4266- 440 -44 137.50 + 021792 - 01/15/85 - - -- --- - - - — - 137.50 - - -- - - - - -' - - - - - ----- -- _ JOEL 2ADJ_VOVICH _ - - -- — - - :LOTHING -- -- - _ -- - - - - - . 10 -4266- 440 -44 � 1 37.50 021793 U1/15/85 -- - 137950 — ALLEV ROT4E CLOTHING 10- 4266 - 440 -44 137.50.+ 021194 11/15/85 137.50 RONAL) SAMUELSOV :LOTNING 1D- 4266 - 440 -44 137.50 + 021795 01/15/85 137.50 JAMES SINGLETON CLOTHING 10 -4266- 440 -44 _ 02119b 01 /15/85 137.50 CLOTHING 10- 4266- 440 -44 a.+ -CKS 02179 1 0.1/15/85 137.5 0 GREG SMEGAL CLOTHING 10- 4266- 440 -44 137.50 + i U21798 01/15/85 137.50 RICHAAO V ---ANON CLOTHING 10- 4266 - 440 -44 137.50 + � V 021799 01/15/85 137950 KEN 4ELS04 CLOTHING 10 -4266- 440 -44 i' 137.50 + 021800. 01/15/85 301.13. TED ?AULFRAN2 CLOTHING 10- 4266 - 440 -44 - � 300. 13,* v 021801 0„1/15/85 300.10. FRANK WELLMAN CLOTHING 10- 4266- 440 -44 307.10.* 02180.2 0.1/15/85 30000. TERRY KEHOE CLOTHING 10- 4266 - 440 -44 300.10 + 021803 0.1/15/85 303.1D. MM HANSEN CLOTHING 10- 4266- 440 -44 300.)9, 021804 01/15/85 300.30 UM FECK- CLOTHING 10 -4266- 440 -44 _ 300.70. • _ -- - s 021805 0.1/16/85 60.00 MARGgR:T !_EE INSTRUCTOR 23- 4100 - 614 -61 — 60.00 + U218Q6 01/16/85 64.30- KATHY GUSTAFSON INSTRUCTOR 23- 4100 - 614 -61 64.10 + 021BQ7 01/16/85 200.0,0 BOB COIMNOLLY INSTRUCTOR 23- 4100 - 614 -61 200.00 + 1985+ CI TY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE U2180,8 0.1/16/85 021809 '.1/16185 0215 1C .1/16/85 021 811 01/16/85 021 812 U1 /16/85 IJ21812 u.1/16195 021812 01/16/85 021813 U- 1/16/85 021S14 01 /16/85 u21815 (i1/16/85 021816 D1/16/85 021817 (;1/16/85 021818 L1/16/85 021 81 9 0.1/16/85 021820 01/16/85 021821 0.1 /16%85 021822 11/16/85 021823 L1/16185 021824 01/16/85 CORRECTION 30- 4310 - 000 -00 8 CHECK REGISTER 01 -21 -85 PAGE 25 AMOUNT V_N301 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INY. R P.O. 4 MESSAGE 216.00 JO FIENCH INSTRUCTOR 23 -4100- 614 -61 216. ^D • - - 199.30 STAR OFFICE MACHINES GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 260 -26 199.10 • - - - - 53.00 M =TR) PIAT) CHIEF DUES 10- 4204 - 440 -44 53.77 • 510.51 Mfl D:-'PT OF REVENUE GASOLINE 10- 2010- 000 -00 510.51 • 75.37- GENE BART7_ CORRECTION 30- 4310 - 000 -00 75.00 GENE BARTZ EXAMINATION 30- 4310- 000 -00 75.00 GENE BART2 HATER WATER CERT 30- 4310 - 809 -80 ' 75.00 • 27J.D0 MN POLLJTIDN CONTROL SCHOOL 40- 4202 - 809 -80 270.00 • 173.05 X'ERO( EQUIP RENTAL 10- 2010 - 000 -00 173.15 19056.20 LABOR R1= LATIONS ASSN CONT SERV 10- 2010 - 000 -00 19055.23 • 23.80 EDINA EMPLOYEES CLUB GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 500 -50 28.ap • 450.00 UNIVERSITY OF CONFERENCE 10- 4202 - 440 -44 453.00 47.:`0 INTL SOCIETY OF DUES 10- 4204 - 440 -44 40.10 398.25 CHERYL LYVN BREID CONT SERV '` = 10 -4200- 500 -50 398.25 215.1) PTA: MANAGEMENT COURSE 10 -4202- 420 -42 215. ?0 • 45900 PTAC DEFENSIVE TACTICS 10- 4202 - 421 -42 45.00 • 4.99 RADIO SCHACK GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 460 -46 4.99 • 5.30 FIRE INSTRUCTORS DUES 10- 4204 - 440 -44 5.09 • 90000 MINNESOTA STATE DUES 10- 4204- 440 -44 97.00 • ••• -CKS 8 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -21 -85 PAGE 26 CAIECK N0. DATE _ 4yDUN� V= VDOt IT.EM. DESCRIPTIONAC�AUNT_NO.INV. _.f- P.O.p MESSAGE 346U67 01/16/85 _. _ 10.35 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI _._ _.- _ _- - -. 50 -4628- 822 -82- MANUAL 346J67 01/16/85 771.90 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 346067 01/16/85 617.00 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 346U67 01/16/85 10.35 ED DISTRI 50- 4628 +842 -84___ - _. MANUAL 346367 01/16/85 193.25 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 346767 0.1/16/85 4.05 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628= 862 -86 MANUAL 346138 U,1/16/85 19606.97 -_ ED _ _ _ __ PHILLIP'S - 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL rrrrrr U1/16185 9.41- ED PHILLIOG 50 -3710- 842 -84 +++ -CKS _ 346135 01/16/85 4.70 - EAGL: IfIN- PIILLI'-S 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 346135 U1/16/85 16.29- EAGL= WINE PAILLI01S 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 346135 0.1 /16 /85 1605- WINE _ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 346135 01/16/85 234.76 EAGLE TIN= P ILLIDIS _ 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 346135 01/16/85 814.37 EAGL2-' MINE PiILLI'S 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 3461 35 _ 01/16/85 --------- - -_ - -- 817.26._ -__ -___ -_ EAGLE_ BIN PHILLIPS ------------ ---. -- 50- 4628 - 862- 86._- _ - -_ -- VANUAL 346138 01/16/85 19829.07 + ED P4ILLPS____.___ -- -- �- _ -- -- -_- 503710- 862 -86 _. _- -- MANUAL rrrrrr + ++ CKS 346138 01/16185 35.90- ED PiILLID6 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL _ 346138 _- ,_01/16/85 - -___- 3.60-_-. ED PHILLIPS T- 50- 37.10- 822 -82 MANUAL 346138 01/16/85 37.30- ED PHILLIPSS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 346138 01/16/85 .27 ED PMILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL _ 346138 01/16/85 6.32- ____ ED PiILLI'S_ 50- 3710 - 822- 82_____- MANUAL 346138 U,1/16/85 36.74- -_ ED _ _ _ __ PHILLIP'S - 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL _ 346138 U1/16185 9.41- ED PHILLIOG 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL _ 346138. _ - _- U1/16/85 _ -, 19.15- ED PIILLI'-S _50- 3710 - 842 -84__ __, - -____ MANUAL 346138 0.1/16/85 84.96- ED PAILLI01S 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL _ 346138 01/16/85 15.43- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL _ 346138 U.1/16f95 _ 3.54 _ ED P ILLIDIS _ 59-3710-962-86 MANUAL 346138 U1/16/85 10.67- ED PiILLI'S 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 346138 01/16/85 104.13- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 346138 01/16/85 -_ 69.66- ED P4ILLPS____.___ -- -- �- _ -- -- -_- 503710- 862 -86 _. _- -- MANUAL 346138 U1/16/85 11.72- E) PiILLI 33 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 346138 U1/16/85 1.06 ED P1,ILLI3S 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL _ 346138 U1/16/85 _. 19864.75 __. _ _ __ -ED PHILLI °S .._- - -___ 50 -4626- 822 -82 _ -_ MANUAL 346138 J1/16/85 1,795.10 ED PATLLIPIS 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 346138 0.1/16/85 19802.01 ED Pi1 LLIo,S 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 346138 _ 01/16/85 49243.00 _ED_ PHILLIPS - - - -- - -- --- -- - -- - - _ - - -- -- -- - MANUAL 346138 0.1/16/85 59206.50 ED PHILLIPis 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 346138 01/16/85 181.86- E7 PMILLrPis 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL ., 346138 0.1116/85 _ __- _-- 39483.02ED PiILLIaS._. __ -- _ 50-4626-862-86 MANUAL 346138 01/16/85 9.95- E) PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 346138 U.1/16/85 316.20 ED PiILLIDlS 50- 4628- 822 -32 MANUAL - _ 34613801/16 /85,. _ 187 -.7.0_ FD- PHILLI °3 - -- T -50- 4628 - 822 -82._ MANUAL 346138 0.1/16/85 410.60 ED PiILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 346138 01/16/85 957.40 ED P4ILLIpS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 346138 0.1/16/85 ___771 *65 _ E] P4ILLI 35 _. _ 50 -6628- 862- 86__________�_ MANUAL 346138 U.1/16/85 53.00- ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 346138 01/16/85 586.07 ED Pi ILLIDIS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL .. 5461.38 u1/16/85 533.68 7 _P MIL.L,IR __ 50- 4628 - 862 -86 -- MANUAL 219525.84 • r r r r r a - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - -- - - - 4 - + r r- C K S 11985SCITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR 346193 60 /16/85 5.15- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 34619J 01/16/85 20.49- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 346190 01/16/85 154.83- GRIGGS CO3PER AND C 346190 0.1/16/85 10.30- GRIG33 CO3 PER AND C 346197 il/16/85 94.84- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 346190 01/16/85 257.60 GRIGGS COO ?ER AN) C 346190 01/16/85 1,024.44 GRIGGS COOPlER AND C 346193 11/16/85 79115.55 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 346192' J.1/16/95 515.20 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 346190 01/16/85 4.742.12 GRIGGS COOPER AN) 1207 INTERCONTINENTAL 13.970.30 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 49788.66 ***r ** 346271 346211 346271 346271 3462 71 3462 71 346271 346271 346271 346271 346 21 1 345271 346271 346271 346271 346271 346271 346271 346271 346271 346271 346271 34627 1 346271 346271 346271 346271 346271 346271 346271 345271 346 21 1 346271 346285 346285 346 28'5 01/16/85 0.1/16/85 01/16/85 01/16/85 01/16/85 01/16/85 61/16/85 01/16/85 01/16/85 01/16195 3.1/16/85 71/16/85 01/16/85 01 /16/85 0.1/16/65 01/16185 01/16/85 U1/16/85 01 /16 /85 01/16/85 01/16/85 01/16/85 J1/16185 01/16/85 01/16/85 01/16/85 01/16/85 71/16/85 01/16185 0'1/16/85 01/16/85 01/16/85 01 /16/8 5 01/16/8` 0,1/16/85 01/16/85 01 -21 -85 PAGE 27 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT No. INV. a_P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3 710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50-4626-842-84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 46.67- INTE1C34TYNENTAL PK 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 6979- INTERCONTI4EVT4L PK 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 11.99- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 6.79- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 38.21- INTERCONTIN_NTAL PK 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 9.24- INTEICOVT*_NENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 95.77- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 3.91- INTER :OVTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 6.79- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 64.14- INT =RCOVTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 14.32- TNTERCONTTNEVTAL PK 53- 3710- 862.86 MANUAL 2,333.72 I4TER= 34TINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 1207 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 49788.66 INTERCOVTINENTAL PK _ _ _ 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 21.40 INTERCONTINENTAL _ PK ._ _ 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 10.130 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 3.209.09 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 57- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 3.1.1 IVTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 599.80 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 339.50 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 3.63 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 339.50 INTERCONTINENTAL PK '' 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 19910.75 INTERCONT?NEVT4L PK 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 3.91 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 462.40 INTERCDVTTNENTAL PK 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 3.00 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 13.50 T4TERC34TTNENTAL PK 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 3.00 INTE2CO4TI4E4TAL PK 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 5.10 INTEIC04TINENTAL PK 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 339.50 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 195.91 TNTERCOVTINENTAL PK 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 3.00 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 716.15 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 159011.62 • - - - - *** -CKS 4.93 - _.JOHN304'WINE_ - -- 50-3710-822-82 ,. MANUAL 42.62- JDHdi3W WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 13.81- JOHN30N WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL R a e 1965 CITY OF EDINA - -. CHECK REGIST =R 01 -21 -85 PAGE 28 CHECK N0. _DATE _.. ^_ .__ AMOJNT,_ d= ND02 _ _ _-- _I_TEM DESCRIPTION____ - ,___ACCOUNT- _NO...__TNY._.It_ Pa 0. 11 MESSAGE 346285 01/16/85 3.34- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 346285 � 1 /16/85 9049 -__ JOHNSON YIN= _ ._ .. _ _ _ _ _ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 3462.55 01/16/85 .11 JDHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 _ _ MANUAL 346285 01/16/85 3990 JOHNSON• WINE 5D -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 346285 01/16/85 _ - 246.63-___.- .___JOHNSON .WINE - -_ _ - _50- 4628- 822- 82.______ MANUAL 346285 u1/16/85 690.76 JOHNSON` WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 _ ____._ _ MANUAL 346285 0.1/16/85 39.30 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 34 62 85 01/16/85 - 10.50 _- .JOHNSON -WINE -,_- - -50- 4628 - 842 -84_.- MANUAL 346285 01/16/85 29131.20 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 _ MANUAL 346285 01/16/85 5.62- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 346285 G1/16/85 _ 2.79 JJHVSONWINE 50- 4628 - 862- 86- MANUAL 346285 01/16/85 494.46 JOHNSON MINE ___ 50 -4628- 862 -86 -__ MANUAL 346285 01/16/85 6.60 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 346285 _ Ul/16/85 _ -_ _ _ 161.46_ -___ ,)OH4SOV WINE -_ -__- _ 50 -4628- 862- 86 MANUAL 01 /16/8 5 131.70 39713.42 • WINE 345451 0.1/16/85 irff ►+ - - ------ - --- -- - -- - -- -- - t,++ -CKS 346435 01/16/85 12.12- PRTOi fIN= CO 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 346435 01/16/85 _ _ 10.88- PRIOR WIN =_CO _ 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 346435 01/16/85 12.45- PRIOR WIN= CO 50- 3710- 862 -86 _f_- MANUAL 346435 01/16185 605.96 PRIOR WIN: CO 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 346435 _ _ C1/16/85 543.85 - _PRIOR [IN:_CO 50- 4628 - 842- 84 MANUAL 346435 01/16/85 622.53 PRIOR WIN= CO 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 19736.89 + -- - rir -CKS 346451 01/16/85_ - -. 345451 01/16/85 47.57- QUALITY WINE 346451 01/16/85 6.86- QUALITY WIN_ 345451 G1/16/85 .39 QUALITV.WINE_ 346451 01/16185 9.07- QUALITY WIN' 345451 01/16/85 2053- QUALITY WINE 345451 01/16/85 92.03-_QUALITY_ - WINE__.__ 346451 0.1/16/85 10.29- QUALITY WINE 346451 01/16/85 26.54 - QUALITr YIN= 345451 0.1/16185 .98-__ 345451 01/16/85 1O7.7S- QUALITY WINE 346451 01/16/85 075 QUALI Tr YI'N- 345451 01/16185 - - _.- QUALITY 346451 01/16/85 29378.7!1 - _WINE__- QUALITY .. - -- -- WINE 345451 01/16/85 49601.52 QUALITY' WINE 346451 01/16/85 _._ _- _59388.36 QUALITY. YIN_ 345451 01/16/85 3.19- QUALITY WINE - 345451 01/16/85 635.27 QUALITY WINE 345451 0.1/16/35 _GJALITYYINE_______ 345451 01 /16/8 5 131.70 QUALITr WINE 345451 0.1/16/85 15012- GUALITY WINE 346451 01/16/85498. 64. 345451 0.1/16/85 2.57- QJALITA WINE - 346451 01/16/85 19327.18 QUALITY' WINE 346451 ---- _ 01/16./85 514.76 QUALI_TY WIN:___ 345451 0- 1/16/85 49.00 QUALITY YIYE 159530.66 • a 50 -3710- 822 -82 50 -3710- 822 -82 5D- 3710 - 822 -82 -_ _ -__50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710- 842 -84 50- 3710 - 842 -84 - - 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710- 862 -86 50 -3710- 862 -86 50- 3710- 862 -86 ,.50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 4626 - 822 -82 50- 4626- 842 -84 ___50-4626-862-86 50- 4626 - 862 -86 - - 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628- 842 -84 50 -4628- 842 -84 50 -4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 862 -86 - - -- 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL _- MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL _MANUAL ... _ MANUAL 19351 C. OF EDINA t CAIECK NO. DATE ff.•.i 346540 U1/16/B5 346540 'i1 /16/e5 346540 01/16/85 34654G- i 1 / 16 /85 346540 01/16/85 346540 31/16185 .ff. ►. 353U67 353U67 353J67 353U67 353135 353135 353135 353135 353135 3531 35 f f f f 1 f 3531 38 3531 33 3531 3? 353138 353138 3531 38 353138 3531 38 35313 P 353138 353139 353138 3531 38 3531 38 353138 353138 3531 38 353138 3531 3F 353138 3531 38 35313,9 U1/16 /85 u1/16/85 01/16/85 01/16/85 D1 /16/85 CHECK Rt- ..,TER EAGLE WIN_ 01 -21 -85 ..GE 29 e40'JNT Y =NoOl ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. q P.O. f MESSAGE _ ._._._ .__....__.._..___ 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 0,1/16/85 •.. -CKS 24.39- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 2.99- TWIN CITY WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 149.75 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 19219.55 TWIN CITY W TIN E 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 2.43 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 28.50 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 19312.52 • - - - -- - - - -. _ -- - -- -- _ _ ••..CKS 0.1/16/85 4.15- ED PiILLI�3 ..• -CKS 13.53 CAPITAL CITY DaSTRI 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 19025.'_51 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 2.25 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 179.55_ CAPITAL.CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 1 9221.11 7.27- E9 PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 0.1/16/85 26.71- ••,* -CKS D1 /16/85 .98- EAGLE WIN_ 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 01/16/95 19.66 -- _ EAGLE id'INE, __ ___ _ ._._._ .__....__.._..___ 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 0,1/16/85 3.33- EAGLE WINE ._. 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL J1/16/85 49.80 EAGLE W'INE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 0.1/16/85 39983.24 EACLE WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL U1/16/85 401.35 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 49344.72 • -- - - - -- - - - -. _ -- - -- -- _ _ ••..CKS 0.1/16/85 4.15- ED PiILLI�3 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 0/16/85 107.87- ED PHILLI ?S 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 01/16/85 19.94- ED PHILLI RS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL U1/16/85 14.34- ED PILL ?DG 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL ul/16/85 7.27- E9 PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 0.1/16/85 26.71- ED PiILLI01S 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL -il/16/85 14.37- ED PiILLIP'S 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 01/16/85 26.09 -- ED PHILLI ?S 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 01/16/85 20956- E7 PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 01/16/85 5.74- ED P41LLIDiS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL ul/16/85 37.63- E) PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 0.1/16/85 991.20 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 01116/85 59393931 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 3.1/16/85 363.36 ED PlILLIP;S 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 01/16/85 19304.35 E) PHILLI °S 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 01/16f85 287.00 ED_ PHILLID,S _ _ 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 01/16/85 19881.74 ED PRILLIP'S _ - _ 50- 4626- 862 -86 _ MANUAL 0.1/16/85 717.90 E) PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL Ll /16/e5 207950 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL J1/16/85 19335965 E) PHILLIP'S _ 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 01/16/85 718.50 E7 PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 3]/16/85 - 1027.75 ED PHILLIPS - - - 50 -4628- 862-86 MANUAL 139948.69 • _ &&**** * *-CKS c c 1985 CITY OF EDINA - - I4TEIC04TTNE14TAL PK -- CHECK REGISTER 19.73- 01 -21 -85 PAGE 30 r CHECK NO. DATE _- AHOUNT - __I_N00? — _ ._.ITE- M_ DES_ CRI?TION_-__- _- _AC.C.AUNT_NO9.INVe__#_Pe0q_# MESSAGE 3531 9J 01/16/85 _,_120.38- _ GRIGGS COOPER AN) C _ 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 3531 9) 01/16/85 103.90- GP,IG3S C01PER 4ND C 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL _ 353193 1,1/16/85 91.66- GRIGGS COOPER AN) C 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 353190 01/16/85 69018.95 GRIGGS CO ?PER 4ND C 50- 4626 - 822- 82__ -___ ___ _ MANUAL 35319) ;71/16/85 59190.13 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL _ 353191 )1/16/85 49569.00 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL ,.60 INTEtCOYT,INENTAL_PK_._._- _...__158462.14 f 9.03 69466.31 • WINE 353285 71/16/85 29049.80 _ ftfttr WIVE 353295 01/16/85 674.45___ _,JOHNSON WINE- .�.___ 353285 ••• -CKS I 353271 3532/1 353? 71 353271 353211 353271 353271 353271 353211 353271 353271 353271 353271 353271 353271 353Z71 353271 353271 tf ►•t r 01/16/85 _ - -- -- - - -� 1.55 - - - - I4TEIC04TTNE14TAL PK -- 31/16/85 19.73- INTEICOVTTNENTAL PK 01/16/85 ____ 5.72 _ _ __' INTERCONTINENTAL 0.1/16185 01/16/85 42.79- INT= ICOVTINENTAL PK 61/16/85 3.95 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 01/16/85 _ - _ 1.29 - _ -_ _ INTERCONTTNENTAL PK___, 01/16/85 T8 .7R- IVTEICOVTTNENTAL PK 01/16/85 986.95 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 01/16/85 _ 303 _ I:VTEICONTINENTAL PK 01/16/85 198.23- INTEtCOVTTNENTAL PK 01/16/85 9.30 TVTEICONTINENTAL PK 01/16/85 _ 21139 967TNTEIC34TT'NENTAL 0.1/16/85 PK. 01/16/85 15.80 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 01/16/85 3,939.30 INTS:RCONTINENTAL PK 01/16/85 _ 78 .50- ._14TEIC04TINENTAL JOHNS 014- PK,_____ 01/16/85 286.30- INTERCOVTINENTAL PK 01/16/85 64.R6 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 01116/85- ,_�_______ ,.60 INTEtCOYT,INENTAL_PK_._._- 01116/85 9.03 69466.31 • WINE 353285 353285 01/16/85 34.51- JOHNSON' WINE 353285 01/16/85 .92- JOHNSO.W WIVE 353285 0.1/16185 6.87- JOHNSON WENE 353285 01/16/85 5.57- JOHNSOW WINE 353285 0.1/16/85 3.68- JOHNSON WIVE 353285 J1/16/85 40.99- JOHNSOW WIVE 353285 01116/85 9.53- JOHNSOW WINE 353295 0.1/16/85 1.23- JOMN33V- , WIVE _____,._ 35328.5 01/16/85 1.23 -• JOHVSOW WINE 353285 0.1/16/85 13.415- JOHNSON WINE 35328-5 01/16/85 _. 1.73 -,_ ON WINE 353285 0.1/16/85 6.43. JOHNS 014- WIVE 35328 -5 31/16/85 19725.80 JOHNSON WINE 353285 01/16/85 ___7.50_ - _ JOHNS ON WINE___ _ 353285 01116/85 9.03 JOHVSOY WINE 353285 71/16/85 29049.80 JOHNS 0* WIVE 353295 01/16/85 674.45___ _,JOHNSON WINE- .�.___ 353285 01/16/85 3913 JOHNSON WINE 353285 01/16/85 41.28 JOHNSON WINE 353285 _ _ 01/16/85_ _ 6.0,0 __JO HNS0V WINE- ,_-,_. - -� 353285 01/16/85 3933 JOHNSON WINE 353285 0.1/16/85 343974 JOHNSO,W WINE - - 9999.. - -- - - -- - -- - -- � �-- ._ -.-•- "50_3710-U2-_U - MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50-3710-862-86 MANUAL 50-3710-862-86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4626- 822 -82 _ _ -_ _ _,- MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4626- 842- 84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862- 86______- MANUAL - -- - ttf -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL ...... 5U-3710-822-82 MANUAL 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL �_- 50- 3710 - 842 -84 _ MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL __- 50- 3710 - 842 -84 _ _ MANUAL 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL _ 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4626- 822 -82- MANUAL 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 5D-4626-842-84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 _. _ _ MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4628- 822 -82_ -50- MANUAL _.. . 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 353433 01/16/85 198 -1 Cl Jr EDINA fakfif V= NOD R ITEM DESCRIPTION C!lECK NO. DATE 353285 01/16/85 353285 01/16/85 353285 01/16/85 353285 01/16/85 353285 01/16/85 353285 01/16185 353285 01/16/85 353285 01/16/85 353285 1,1/16/85 35328'5 01/16185 353285 01/16/85 353285 11/16/85 353285 01/16/85 35323.5 arrtar 0- 1/16/85 353433 01/16/85 353433 0.1/16/85 fakfif V= NOD R ITEM DESCRIPTION 353435 61/16/85 353435 01/16/85 353435 01/16/85 353435 61/16/85 353435 0.1/16/85 553435 01/16/85 353435 01/16/85 353435 01/16/85 f r f f a f 553451 353451 353451 553451 353451 353451 353451 353451 353451 353451 313451 353451 353451 353451 353451 353451 353451 3.)3451 353451 DI /16/85 CHECK RL .i =R QUALITY' 01 -21 -85 jE 31 AMOUNT V= NOD R ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27804 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL .60 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 184.79 JOHNSOW WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 9.30 JOHNSON WT4E 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 093 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 47600 JOHNSON WIVE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 61992 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 2.70 JOHNSOV WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL .90 JOHNSON WIVE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 1.50 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 61.92 Jr)HN304 WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 321.89 JOHUiON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 86.90 J3HN30% WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 5.1-0 JOHNS 04 WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 6,231 .46 • MANUAL 01/16/85 5.57- QUALITY PINE _ _ _ _50- 50 -3710- 862 -86 4**-CKS 4.00 PAUSfIS & SONS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 193.17 PAUSIIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL QUALITY, WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 , 01/16/85 656.35 QUALITY fff -CKS 1.71- PRIOR W -I N= C0 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 10.31- PRIOR SIN= CO _ 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 4.60- PRIOR WIN_ CO 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 2.45- PRIOR WINE CO 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL _ 85.50 PRIOR NINE CO -T - 50 -4628- 822 -82_ -50- MANUAL 515.OD PRIOR WINE CO 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 229.86 PRIOR YIN: CO 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 122.50 PRIOR WIN= CO 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 933.80 • fff -CKS DI /16/85 17.15- QUALITY' WIPE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 61/16/85 67.98- QUALITY WINE _ -_50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 61/16/85 13.12- QUALITA WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL u,1/16/85 .49- QJ ALL TV W14E 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 01/16/85 1.47- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 0.1/16/85 4.76- DUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL U.1/16/85 9.23- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 0.1/16/85 13.16- QUALITY 411 NE 50 -3710- 842 -84_ MANUAL 1.1/16/85 25.68- OUALITV WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 01/16/85 63.61- OUALITK MINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL U1/16/85 52.51- QUALITY WINE _ _ 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 01/16/85 5.57- QUALITY PINE _ _ _ _50- 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL C1/16/85 2.R1- QUALITY WIN= 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 01/16/85 3,399.33 QUALITY, WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 01/16/85 656.35 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL L'1/16/85 39180.75 QUALITY WINE 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 31/16/85 1. 284.45 _OUALITY WINE --- ___ „-__ -4626- 842- 84______ MANUAL 01/16/85 29625.14 QUALITY WINE -_50 50 -4626- 862 -86 __ MANUAL 01/16/85 73.50 QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -21 -85 PAGE 32 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT _ VE,,4DOi _ _ ITEM DESCRIPTION - ACCOUNT .NO* INV*. # P*0* A MESSAGE 353451 01/16/65 238.15 OJALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 353451 01/16/85 857.55 QJALITr WTN_ 50- 4628- 822.82 MANUAL 353451 U1/16/85 24.50 9UALITf WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 353451 0.1/16/35 658.39 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 353451 01 /16/8 5 461.46 QJALITY WIPE _ -_ __ - -... _ 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 353451 UI/16/85 278.59 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 353451 0.1/16/85 14005 QUALITV' WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 139601.83 •rr*1r *** -CKS 353540 01/16/85 2.30- TWIN CITY HIVE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 353540 01/16/85 1.50- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 35354J 01/16/85 1.37 TWIN CITY WINE _ __ - -- -_ ,__ _ 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 35354J 0,1/16/85 2.10 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 353540 0.1/16/8`. 115.21 TWIN CIJ Y WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 353540 01/16/85 _ 75.25 TWIN CITY WING _ -_ _ - - -_ _. 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 553540 01/16/85 69.15- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 353540 L1/16/85 1.50 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 122.48 1r * ** -CKS 353581 G1/16/85 1.95 VINITALIA 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 353557 0.1/16/85 152 *7D VI NITAL•IA 53- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 353581 01/16/85 .65 VINITALIA 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 353531 0.1/16/85 44.00 VINITALIA 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 198.60 • *Errs• t *f -CKS 359067 01/16185 1. 00- CAPITAL CITY DISTRT _ _. _ 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 359067 01/16/85 30.15 CAPITAL CITY DISTRT 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 359067 01/16/85 29396.15 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 29425.30 r*f tt* * ** -CKS 359129 U1/16/85 68703 B7LL3 f 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 359129 1.1/16/85 69014.50 BELL30Y 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 359129 U1/16/85 2,p814.15 B= LL3Ofi _. . -� _. _ _ 50- 4626- 842 -84 _ MANUAL 359 12 9 J.1/16/85 49621.68 BELL30Y 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 14 9137.33 • r*rrlr - - - -- -- -- - - -- - -- -. __ - *** -CKS 359135 U1/16/85 _- 6.29 -_ -__ __.EAGL_ YIN= _ -. -_. _ 50- 3710 - 822 -82 _ MANUAL 359135 01/16/85 35. ?0- EAGLE WIN_ 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 359135 01/16/85 24.45- EAGL_ WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 359135 0,1/16/85 314.?8 EAGL_ NINE _. - __- 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 359135 61/16/85 10784.85 EA GL_ YIN_ 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 359135 3.1/16/45 1#222.73 EAGL_ WIN_ 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL - -- - 38255.42 * t f t f - * ** -CKS 2 • r 19851 CI F EDINA CHECK RE ER 01 -21 -85 E 33 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT_ _ VENDV ITEM DESCRIPTION ___ - - -. ___ACCOUNT NO. INV...11 P.O. # MESSAGE 359138 01/16/85 5.54 - ED PIILLIP,S _ _ 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 359138 U1/16/85 16.55- ED PiILLIPB 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 359138 01/16/85 10.78 - E) PHILLI °S 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 359138 01116/85 134.94- ED P4IL.LIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 359138 01/16/85 37.98- ED PWILLIPS _. _._ 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 350138 U1/16/85 25.59- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 359138 0,1/16/85 16.20- EO P4ILLIPig 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 359139 01/16/85 5.41- ED P41 LLIP13 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 359138 01/16/85 107952- El PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 359138 01/15/85 106.70- ED P4ILLI3S _ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 _ MANUAL 359138 01/16/85 1098 - ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 359138 0.1/16/85 69747.24 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 359,138 01/16/85 59330.80 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 359138 01/16/85 827.25 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 35Y138 U1/16/85 232.30 E) PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 350138 U1/16/85 19329.12 ED PlILLIbs 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 359138 01/16/85 19893.75 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 359138 01/16/85 538.85 EO PHILLIPlS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 359138 01/16/85 99.73 F_) PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 359138 01/16/85 59335.10 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 350138 01/16785 270.53 TO PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 359138 u1/16/85 809.93. ED P1ILLIP13 _ _ 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 239043.26 999999 rrr -CKS 359190 01/16/85 48.26- GRIGGS COOPER AN) C 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 350190. ;:1/16/85 101.43- GRIGGS COOPER ANO C _ ._ `__- _ .. 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 359190 0.1/16/85 81.43- GRIGGS COOPER AND C - ., 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL - 350190 01/16/85 29413.00 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 359`190. 1,1/16/85 59071.62 GRIGGS CO3PEI AN) C 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 350190 0.1/16/85 49074.18 GRIGGS CODER AND C 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 119327.63 + ....•r - - ••. -CKS 359271 G1/16/85 22.41- INTERCONTINENTAL PK „- '' -'= 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 359271 01/16/85 1.74- INTEtCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 359271 01/16/85 184.89- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 359271 31/16/85 14.30- INTERCONTINENTAL P( 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 359271 01/16/85 14208- INTERCONTINENTAL PK _ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 359271 01/16/85 16.98- INTEtCONTINENTAL PK 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 359271 01/16/85 3.33 I4TEACONTTNENTAL PK 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 35YZ71 01/16/85 19120.76 I4TEI:04TINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 359271 21/16/85 44915 INTEtC04T?NENTAL PK 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 359271 01/16/85 99221.7.7 !NTEICONTTNE4TAL PK 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 3591271 01/16/85 26.40 - INTEt:DNTINENTAL PK 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 359271 L'1/16/85 79144.J7 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 359271 01/16/85 160 IVTERCONTINENTAL PK _ 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 359211 0.1/16/85 87.:0 INTERCONTINENTAL PK _ 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 359271 71/16/85 740946 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 359271 01/16185 6.30 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 359271 01/16/85 - 849.16 INTEtCONTINENTAL PK SD- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 3592/1 01/16/85 5.4D INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL s S • • e e Q e e e f e e e e • e t e c ~=___~' ,pnn czry OF Emzmx cmccn xsoosrcn 01~21~85 pxsc 34 CHECK mo° n«rc - �����r-__--' -----���y�o�___-_ '__�_ �I�i-��l��l�Tz40«c��um7_wQ~_zmw°'-w P°o°'w ncooxsc 189864.37 ° ' -- ' - - - - - -------------' ---' - - ' °°°-cns i 35v285 unmo/us a.p,_______Joom3nm Wmc__ _ so_sYvo~000~na�___ mAmuxL 359285 01x16185 vo.oe~ Joxmsom mImc so~sr�o~o�o~u* --- - MxmoxL onnzos 01/16v85 o.ao~ uo*m3o4 wrmc 50-3710-842- 84 mxwuxL 35929-5 uvmovmn _ 72.*3'_ Jo*nnoV uIwc 50~3710~842~8* nxwoxL 359285 ulm6/85 15.47~ uonmsum uzmc so~sr,o~o«o~m*-' - --' mxmuxL n»voon 01/16185 .vs~ Jnxmaox uIxc 50~3710~862~86 nxmoxL 35p235 o.1x16v8 5 y.zo~unmmSu^#uTnc_ nxmuxL 35928-5 G1/16185 20.25~ unxwsov wImc 50~3710~862~86 '------ - MxmuxL 351?285 ylv16/85 n.o*~ JoHwnom WINE so~orxo~m*a~ma nxmuxL 359295 o,f^avns s°xa_ �onxwSum u I NE_ _.sn~waa6~u4a~m^ - - - mxmoxL nsvoun U.1 /16 /85 773.90 Jon m*�� u 14c so~*ac*~o*a~V* mAwuxL 359 28'5 uxvvavon 2.43 Jnmmsom WINE so~*mco~uoa~oa n^moxL s»voxo oIx16/85______145.70 _Jsxwsnv wl mc 50~4*28~822~8 2 _--' _ PxmoxL x»vzoo 0.1 /16 /85 o°um Jnom53w wIwc 50~**28~842~84 mxmuxL 35923n 31x16^85 314.16m JnHwsmm mzwc 50~*628~u*2~84 nxmoxL 359295 01v16/85 _ _3x6 21 .*6 - _Jnwmnow wE ws-__ -__- .5n~**zm~m*o~u4 . nomuxL o»pzos a1x16^85 8910 unxm;ov MINE 50~4628~842~84 nxmuxL 359285 01/16/85 64.83 Jo*wymN wzmc 50~4628~8*2~84 MANUAL snnau» _ o,x16f85 ?51 .*0Jowwaow_uzoc50_46 28~842~84nmmuxL snvaxv 01/16x85 l°uo Jm*msmt urmc 50~**28~862~86 -------- MxmuxL 359285 01/16185 163°41 omwvnmx wEwc 50~4628~86e~86 nxmuAL 359285 1)1v16185 _ _ _ 18.50 _ _ unwwso* WINE - _ 50~46 28~86 2~86 wxwoxL 35928'5 01x16x85 n°nm uo*mnnw wzmc 50~4628~862~86 --- - nxmoxL 359285 01v16/85 *oa.ss Jw*wnuo wEwc 50~4628~862~86 nxmuxL 35?285 Jxvv6vwnI-LE)xz.o2_Jnomyox_uzwc--____-_--- ��-------no~4aam~uaa~oa---- 50~*628~862~86 *xmvxL 359285 o 1fl6f85 �m.no u)*vnov WINE '--' nxmu^L os*zuo 01v16x85 °oo umxmsm,'t uImc 50~4628~862~86 'nxwmxL °^°~cns 359*35 oix16185- ----------- ���-'----pa/o��zWE'��'---- ---- ------------------------50-3710~842--84'---- mxwuxc 359*35 u1 v16 v8 5 s°vs~ pmz01 uzmf CO 50~3710~8*2~84 mxmuxL s»o*u» u1/16v85 _ 4.33r _ pmzwa mzms co__-.--_ -_---__--____--_________50~3710~862~86 nxmoxc 359435 u`x16v85 *.om~ pozmm wsmc CO 50~*628~842~8*----- nxmoAL 359435 0.1/16/85 257°4n pxz31 uImc Co 50~46 28~84 2~8* nxwuxL 359435 01 /16/815 uzN�'-c0 _-''-'_''---_-_-___---'____-___'_--'_-__ �xwom� *os,m� ° -- -- -- °^°°°° - '----------------'--'-' '-------- --------------- ---'--_ - _-_--'-_' °°°~cws . oxp�51 J1/16r85 r°ow~ nuxurp uImr_ no~or,o~moz-xa *xmuxL 3x9*51 01m6v85 �.,-ouwLzrr � �Emc n~3rvn~ooa~n MxmuxL o:v*�� oxv�avms vv°n9~ mmxLIrr wzwE 50~3710~822~82 - nxwuAL 35o451 0.1 /16 ^8 5 s.mm~ mu^LIrr wzuc 50~3710~842-84 mxmuAL 359*51 ov/16v85 5n.00~_-_--._ ouxLzTY_w/mc_ � 50~3710~842~84 nxwoxL 359451 01x16v85 14.81~ mJxLI7r wzws 59~3710~8*2~84'----- - - nxwoxL 359*51 01 /16/85 29°53~ moxLIrY1 uYwc 50-3 n*a n� MANUAL 359451 _-'- �1�,�v»� _-_-__--_-_--_ _~��- --m���zrnL��wc__ -vxo ms7v0V�zm4 ''---- oup4sv o1xva/m! oo°np~, ouxLIry wzmc 50~ 3 710 maa ma nxmuxL � 359451 0-1/16v85 35°52~ noxLzrm uzmc 50~3710~862~86 w4muxL -� � w * 4 6 5.44- 1965iCI = EDINA 01 -21 -85 E 35 AMOUNT_ _. CHECK N0. DATE 359451 01/16/85 359451 01/16/85 359451 01/16195 359451 01/16/85 359451 D-1/16/85 359451 01/16/85 359451 61/16/85 359451 01/16/85 359451 0.1/16/85 359451 01/16/85 350451 01/16/85 359451 01/16/85 359451 01/16/85 359451 01/16/85 359451 JA /16/85 359451 01/16/85 J 9 P • •.... 359540 359 540 359540 359 540 359540 359 540 J.1/16/85 5.44- CHECK RE ER CITY 01 -21 -85 E 35 AMOUNT_ _. __. VENDOR _- __.._ITE_M_DESCRIPTI.ON _____.- .,__ACCOUNT -NO. INV..- •__P.0. -N MESSAGE 049- QUALITY: WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 15.98- QUALITY WINS _ _ .._ 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 2.94- QUALITY WIN= 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 554.81 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 11.86- OUALITY WINE _50- 4626- 842 -84_._ -_ _ MANUAL 29654.43 QUALITY, _. ____•. . -__- WINE _ 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 39799.15 OJALITV WINE 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 177.58 QUALITY MINE - -- 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 369.41 OUALITV WINE _ 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 294.00 QJALITY WIN-- 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 740.75 QUALITY MIN= 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 19475.44 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 24.50 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 147.0O QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 19176.29 QJALITY, WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 19614.50 QUALITY, WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 139336.86 • 1. ••• -CKS J.1/16/85 5.44- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 01/16/85 1.13- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 01/16/85 212.04 TWIN CI +TY WINE __....___..__ _. ... 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 01/16/85 4.53 _ TWIN CITY WINE _._.._. 50- 4628.842 -84 MANUAL 01/16/85 090 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 01/16/85 51.88 TWIN CITY WINE _ _._ 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 322.85 •• +• +♦ +•+ -CKS 171966F.73 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 49823.71 FUVD 20 TOTAL PARK FUND 49003.54 FUVD 23 TOTAL ART CENTER _ 15.75 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUN) 39109.90 FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 149185.50 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 46998 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 6,509.76 FUND 30 TOTAL WATER FUND 119168.48 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 3529175.79 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 29281.37 FUND 50 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 568 9988'.51 T OT4 L - c "- / 1i /Gf AGENDA EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JANUARY 21, 1985 7:00 P.M. HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ROLLCALL MINUTES OF January 7, 1985, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by I. Set Hearing Date A. Property Disposition - Edinborough B. Amendment to Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area Plan EDINA CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATION OF COMMUNITY SERVICE AWARD - Del Edwards MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of November 5, December 3 and 17, and Special Meeting of December 28, 1984, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by I. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. First Reading of Zoning Ordinance requires offering of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass Second Reading or if Second Reading should be waived. Lot{ Divisions, Plats, Appeals from Administrative or Board of Appeals and Adjustments decisions require action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass. A. Zoning Change 1. Second Reading a. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to MD -5 Mixed Development District, Edinborough - Generally located west _of York Avenue and south of West 76th Street (Contd from 1/7/85) (Continue to-2/11/85) 2. First Reading a. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to POD -2 Planned Office District - Opus Corporation /Normandale Golf Inc. B.' Preliminary Plat 1. Camelot West - Opus Corporation /Normandale Golf Inc. C. Final Development Plan 1. Edina Family Care Clinic - Generally located East of Vernon Avenue and north of Link Road D•. Set Hearing Date 1. Amendment to Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area Plan II. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS III. AWARD OF BIDS A. Grading of Van Valkenburg Park B. Indianhead Lake Treatments C. Repair Roof - Swimming Pool Bathhouse IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of January 15, 1985 B. West 70th Street Report C. Board /Commission Appointments D. Appointment to State CHS Advisory Committee E. Feasibility Report - Tree Trimming Project TT -03 - Set Hearing Date F. On -Sale Wine:-License Report G. Revision of 8/6/84 Council Minutes - Easement Vacation for Lot 6, Block 1, The Habitat H; Project Approval & Authorization to Take Bids 1 .1. Hansen Well Redevelopment 2. Bridge Redecking - Valley View Road /Soo..Line Railroad. I• Solid Waste'Management J. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council K. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items 1. Traffic Safety Committee & Speed Awareness Program - January 28 Agenda Edina City Council Page Two V. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass. A. Resolution Authorizing Participation in the Control Data Joint Comparable Worth Study VI. ORDINANCES. First Reading requires offering of Ordinance only. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass Second Reading. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass if Second Reading waived. A. First Reading (Waive Second Reading) 1. Ordinance No. 171 -A19 - To Correct Fee for Ventilation Work Permit VII. FINANCE A. Liquor Fund Report as of October 31, 1984 B. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by for payment of the following Claims as per Pre -List dated 1/21/85: General Fund $171,667.73, Park Fund $4,823.71, Art Center $4,003.54, Swimming Pool Fund $15.75, Golf Course Fund $3,109.90, Recreation Center Fund $14,185.50, Gun Range Fund $46.98, Waterwork Fund $6,509.76, Utility Fund $10,168.48, Liquor Dispensary Fund $352,175.79, .Construction Fund $2,281.37, Total $568,988.51