HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-01-21_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
JANUARY 21, 1985
7:00 P.M.
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
ROLLCALL
MINUTES OF January 7, 1985, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of ,
seconded by
I. Set Hearing Date
A. Property Disposition - Edinborough
B. Amendment to Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area Plan
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
PRESENTATION OF COMMUNITY SERVICE AWARD - Del Edwards
MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of November 5, December 3 and 17, and Special Meeting
of December 28, 1984, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of ,
seconded by
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. First Reading of
Zoning Ordinance requires offering of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall
vote to pass Second Reading or if Second Reading should be waived. Lot Divisions,
Plats, Appeals from Administrative or Board of Appeals and Adjustments decisions
require action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass.
A. Zoning Change
1. Second Reading
a. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to MD -5 Mixed Development District,
Edinborough - Generally located west of York Avenue and south of
West 76th Street (Contd from 1/7/85) (Continue to- 2/11/85)
2. First Reading
a. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to POD -2 Planned Office District
Opus Corporation /Normandale Golf Inc..
B. Preliminary Plat
1. Camelot West - Opus Corporation /Normandale Golf Inc.
C. Final Development Plan
1. Edina Family Care Clinic - Generally located East of Vernon Avenue
and north of Link Road
D•. Set Hearing Date
1. Amendment to Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area Plan
II. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
III. AWARD OF BIDS
A. Grading of Van Valkenburg Park
B. Indianhead Lake Treatments
C. Repair Roof - Swimming Pool Bathhouse
IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of January 15, 1985
B. West 70th Street Report
C. Board /Commission Appointments
D. Appointment to State CHS Advisory Committee
E. Feasibility Report - Tree Trimming Project TT -03 - Set Hearing Date
F. On -Sale Wine - License Report
G. Revision of 8/6/84 Council Minutes - Easement Vacation for Lot 6, Block 1,
The Habitat
H; Project Approval & Authorization to Take Bids
1. Hansen Well Redevelopment
2. Bridge Redecking - Valley View Road /Soo.:Line Railroad.
I• Solid Waste'Management
J. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council
K. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items
1. Traffic Safety Committee & Speed Awareness Program - January 28
i
Agenda
Edina City Council
Page Two
V. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass.
A. Resolution Authorizing Participation in the Control Data Joint Comparable
Worth Study
VI. ORDINANCES. First Reading requires offering of Ordinance only. 3/5 favorable
rollcall vote'to pass Second Reading. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass
if Second Reading waived.
A. First Reading (Waive Second Reading)
1. Ordinance No. 171 -A19 - To Correct Fee for Ventilation Work Permit
VII. FINANCE
A. Liquor Fund Report as of October 31, 1984
B. Claims Paid. Motion of seconded by for payment of
the following Claims as per Pre -List dated 1/21/85: General Fund $171,667.73,
Park Fundj$4,823.71, Art Center $4,003.54, Swimming Pool Fund $15.75, Golf
Course Fund $3,109.90, Recreation Center Fund $14,185.50, Gun Range Fund
$46.98, Waterwork Fund $6,509.76, Utility Fund $10,168.48, Liquor
Dispensary Fund $352,175.79,,Construction Fund $2,281.37, Total $568,988.51
I
MINUTES
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
JANUARY 7, 1985
Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor
Courtney.
MINUTES of December 3, 1984, were approved as submitted by motion of Member
Bredesen, seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned by motionj,of Member
Turner, seconded by Member Richards. Motion carried. /
Gordon L! H,hes
Executive Director
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
NOVEMBER 5, 1984
Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner and Mayor
Courtney.
YOUTH APPRECIATION WEEK PROCLAIMED BY MAYOR. Mayor Courtney presented the following
proclamation which was unanimously approved:
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the vast majority of youth are concerned, knowledgeable and responsible
:citizens; and
WHEREAS, the accomplishments and-achievements of these young citizens deserve
recognition and praise of their elders; and
WHEREAS, Optimists International has, since 1954, developed and promoted a program
entitled Youth Appreciation Week; and
WHEREAS, the citizens of the City of Edina have indicated a desire to join with the
Optimists in expressing appreciation and approval of the contributions of the youth,
the City Council of the City of Edina does, therefore, proclaim the second week in
November as
YOUTH APPRECIATION WEEK
in the City of Edina. By this action let it be known that we have faith in the
ability of today's youth as they assume responsible roles in the future of mankind.
ADOPTED this 5th day of November, 1984.
HEARING DATE SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS. As recommended by staff, Member Turner's
motion was seconded by Member Schmidt, setting November 19, 1984, as hearing date
for the following planning matters:
1) Edinborough;:;- R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to MD -5 Mixed Development District
- Generally located west of York Avenue and south of West 76th Street
2) Our Lady of Grace Church - Conditional Use Permit
3) Victorsen's Valley View 2nd Addition - Generally located south of Valley View Road
and west of Brookview Avenue - Preliminary Plat Approval
BID AWARDED FOR EDINA - BLOOMINGTON STORM SEWER PROJECT. Mr. Rosland presented
tabulation of bids for the storm sewer project at the Pentagon Park location per
Edina's joint powers agreement with Bloomington. The lowest bidder was Austin
P. Keller Construction Company, Inc. at $1,058,721.20 versus the engineer's estimate
of $1,300,000.00. The necessary easements for the project have been received from
property owners on the Edina side of the project. Member Schmidt's motion was
seconded by Member Bredesen for award of bid to Austin P. Keller Construction
Company for $1,058,321.20.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
GOLF COMMITTEE /PARK BOARD REPORT ON BRAEMAR APPROVED. Mr. Rosland introduced Joan
Lonsbury, Chairman of the Park Board, who called forward Roger Harrold and Tass
Von Schmidt -Pauli to identify the Braemar Golf Committee Report on the capital
improvements proposed for the Braemar Golf Course: Renovation and expansion of the
maintenance building, $200,000; expansion of the Par 3 to an Executive Course,
$310,000; renovation and expansion of the Clubhouse, $600,000. Edina residents
whose homes border on or are near the expansion area have been involved in meetings
and tours of the proposed Executive Course layout, and the overall opinion is
favorable. The Executive Course is projected to generate $150,000 in revenues and
$100,000 on net profits the first full year of operation. Anticipated revenues
in the first two years from events held in the year -round meeting /banquet room
facility are $14,000 and $18;000 respectively. The $6.00 green fee for the
Executive Course was questioned and cited as too high a rate for young people.
The Committee made the following recommendations:
1) Approve their report as supporting evidence to the Park Board motion of
August 9, 1983.
2) Approve the recommended start date of the Executive Course and maintenance
building construction to begin in the spring of 1985, the Executive Course
thereby becoming a revenue contributor to the City by 1986.
3) Approve the recommended start date of the Clubhouse expansion to begin in the
spring of 1986.
Member Turner's motion to approve the Golf Committee's report with its recommendations
was seconded by Member Schmidt.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
11/5/84
HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION BROCHURE /CONTINUATION OF NO -FAULT MEDIATION PROCESS
APPROVED. Mr. Rosland introduced Ceil Smith who explained that the proposed
brochure would describe to various employers the City's No -Fault Mediation Process
for handling complaints of discrimination under the Minnesota Human Rights Act.
Apparently, the recent reorganization of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights
has resulted in an increase in referrals to the Edina Human Relations Commission,
whose members are trained to conduct the no -fault process. Ceil stated that the
proposed brochure would be mailed to businesses in Edina to increase awareness about
the mediation service and understanding of both the benefits and limitations of the
process. There being no questions or any further discussion, Member Bredesen's
motion to approve this brochure was seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
PERA ACTION NOTED. Mr. Rosland reported that the.Municipal Legislative Commission,
of which Edina is a member, has adopted a resolution indicated that its member
cities will withhold their employers' contributions for PERA and put those in an
escrow account should appropriate action regarding the appointment of John Allers
as interim PERA Director and related matters not be taken care of by the first of
February, 1985. This action should have no impact on the retirement accounts of
any of Edina's current or past employees; the only impact this would have on the
City is that there would be a 5 to 6% penalty assessment for failure to pay, which
could be made up by the investment on the money held in escrow. Should appropriate
action not be taken by the first of February, a recommendation for action will be
made to the Council. No action was taken.
ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES REPORTS NOTED. Member Turner commented
on the report from the Housing Committee with the proposed revisions to the
Metropolitan Council's Housing Chapter. Member Turner added that she would like
agenda time at their meeting on November 29, 1984. The minutes from AMM's
Transportation Committee were referred to; complaints concerning Highway 18 and
Bren were aired regarding the increased amount of traffic coming out of Opus,
which was cited as Hennepin County's responsibility. Traffic light signals are
the answer at some point in time. Member Turner suggested that this issue be put
on the Traffic Safety Committee's agenda in December.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT REPORT SLATED FOR JANUARY. Mr. Rosland reminded the Council,
that staff will be preparing the Capital Improvement report to bring back to Council
in January, 1985.
LIQUOR STORE OPERATION REPORT CITED. Mr. Rosland reported that individual reports
are expected from the municipal liquor stores; meetings have been taking place with
the private sector. A report is forthcoming concerning the whole municipal liquor
store operation and'what direction the business is going to take.
AGREEMENT APPROVED FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY LABORATORY SERVICES. Mr. Rosland presented
the Hennepin County Laboratory Services Agreement and recommended its continuation.
This Agreement allows the Hennepin County Health Department access to Edina's
laboratory services on a fee per test basis. The fees have been raised an average
of 7% to adjust for increased labor, rent and supply costs. Member Schmidt intro-
duced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RRq(1T.TTTTON
BE IT RESOLVED.by the Edina City Council that the Mayor and City Manager are hereby
authorized and directed to enter into Agreement No. 50014 with the County of Hennepin,
State of Minnesota, whereby the County, through its Community Health Department,
agrees to make payments to tfie City of Edina for analytical and microbiological
laboratory support services,'for the term from January 1, 1985, through December
31, 1985.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1353 -A1 (RELATING TO INDIVIDUAL MASSAGE LICENSES) GRANTED FIRST READING.
Mr. Rosland presented a proposed amendment to Ordinance No. 1353 -A1 related to
massage /sauna licenses. He explained that in 1982 staff had reviewed the possibility
of amending this Ordinance to permit the issuance of individual licenses and not
business licenses to businesses who had only a restricted number of masseuses and
whose primary business was other than a massage service. No further action was taken
at that time. Apparently, there are now enough individual masseuses in other -than-
massage business services to warrant amending to permit the secondary massage
services and to make the Ordinance enforceable against all massage services.
11/5/84
Member Richards then offered First Reading of Ordinance No. 1353 -A1 as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1353 -A1
AN AMENDMENT TO THE ORDINANCE LICENSING AND
REGULATING PHYSICAL CULTURE AND HEALTH SERVICES
AND CLUBS, REDUCING CLUBS AND SALONS, MASSAGE
PARLORS, SAUNA PARLORS, AND ESCORT SERVICES, TO
EXEMPT CERTAIN BUSINESSES FROM THE REQUIREMENT
TO OBTAIN A LICENSE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Exemption from Business License Requirements.
Sec. 2 of Ordinance No. 1353 is hereby amended by adding thereto a new paragraph
(c) as follows:
"(c) The preceding provisions of this section notwithstanding, no business as
described in this section shall be required to obtain a license under this section if
it meets all of the following criteria as evidenced by affidavits and other documents,
including that set out at 4. below, submitted to and in form and substance reasonably
acceptable to the City Clerk:
1. the principal activity of the business shall not be the performance
of massage services;
2. the activity of the business is conducted and performed on the business
premises;
3. no more than two persons licensed to perform massage services under
this ordinance shall perform such massage services at any one time on the business
premises; and
4. the annual gross revenue of the business from performing massage services
is less than 25% of the total annual gross revenue of the business as shown by
financial statements of the kind specified in Section 4 (a) 10 of this ordinance."
Section 2. There is hereby added to paragraph (a) of Section 4, a new subparagraph
10 as follows:
"10. A financial statement, certified as being true and correct by an
independent accountant, showing the gross income of the business to be licensed
for the then last three fiscal years of such business, or such shorter period of
time that applicant may have been in the business to be licensed, itemized as to
each activity of the business, including,.whithout limitation, the gross income
from performing massage services."
Section 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon
its passage and publication.
Motion for First Reading of Ordinance No. 1353 -A1 was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner; Courtney
Motion carried.
CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Schmidt for payment
of the following claims as per Pre -List dated 11/5/84: General Fund $296,809.66;
Park Fund $6,290.19; Art Center $2,402.37; Swimming Pool Fund $17.48; Golf Course
Fund $3,011.47; Recreation Center Fund $10,876.01; Gun Range Fund $9,344.98;
Waterwork Fund $15,720.44; Sewer Rental Fund $162,651.85; Liquor Dispensary-Fund
$4,524.92; Construction Fund $194,805.67; IMP Bond Redemption #2 $12,421.00;
Total $719,176.04.
There being no further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting
adjourned at 8:35 P. M.,
Acting City Clerk
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
DECEMBER 3, 1984
Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner and Mayor
Courtney.
BOY SCOUT TROOP NO. 68 WELCOMED. Mayor Courtney welcomed members of Boy Scout
Troop No. 68, from Good Samaritan Church in West Edina.
EARL MEICHSNER RECOGNIZED. Mr. Rosland introduced Earl Meichsner stating that he
has been an employee of the City since 1968 working in the position as health lab
technician. Mr. Meichsner was commended for his excellent and thorough work in
protecting the community's health and was presented with a silver pen bearing the
Edina Logo. Members of the Council joined in expressing their appreciation of his
dedication and efforts.
MINUTES of the Regular Meetings of September 10, 1984 and October 15, 1984, were
approved as submitted by motion of Member Schmidt, seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING ON ZONING CHANGE FROM R -1 TO MD -5 FOR EDINBOROUGH CONTINUED TO 12/17/84.
As recommended by staff, Member Schmidt's motion was seconded by Member Turner to
continue the public hearing on the zoning change from R -1 Single Dwelling Unit Dist-
rict to MD -5 Mixed Development District for Edinborough, generally located west of
York Avenue and south of West 76th Street, to the meeting of December 17, 1984.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR VICTORSEN'S VALLEY VIEW 2ND ADDITION DENIED BASED ON
FINDINGS, DECISIONS AND REASONS. Planner Hughes recalled that the public hearing
on preliminary plat approval for Victorsen's Valley View 2nd Addition was held at
the Council Meeting of December 3, 1984. The request involves a proposed subdi-
vision of an existing parcel of property on Brookview Avenue into two lots.
Parcel A is the new lot that would be created and would receive its access by way
of a 20 -foot wide strip to Brookview Avenue located to the east. The Council re-
,quested that staff prepare draft findings of facts concerning the proposed plat
and subdivision variance. Mr. Hughes advised that Findings, Decisions and
Reasons have been prepared and that copies had been delivered to Mr. /Mr.s..Folke
Victorsen, their.attorney, and to two of the neighbors adjoining the subject
property. No further comment being heard, Member Bredesen moved denial of the
proposed Victorsen's Valley View 2nd Addition and the requested subdivision
variance, based on the Findings, Decisions and Reasons prepared by staff (copy
attached). Motion for denial was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR LOTS 11 AND 12, BLOCK 1, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 8TH ADDITION.
Mr. Hughes presented a petition for division of Lots 11 and 12, Block 1, Parkwood
Knolls 8th Addition, advising that the request is for party wall.divisions of two
existing double bungalows. Individual utility connectons are provided and staff
would recommend approval. No objections being heard, Member Bredesen introduced
the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the-following described property is at present a single tract of land:
Lot 12, Block 1, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 8TH ADDITION, and
WHEREAS, the owner has requested the subdivision of said tract into separate
parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
Northerly Parcel - Lot 12, Block 1, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 8TH ADDITION', according
to the map or plat on file in the office of the Registrar of Titles,
County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota.
That part of Lot 9, lying Northeasterly of a line drawn from the most
Northerly corner of said lot to a point in the Southeasterly line of said
lot, distant 15 feet from the most Southeasterly corner thereof, Block 1,
PARKWOOD KNOLLS 8TH ADDITION, according to the map or plat on file in the
office of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota.
Except that part thereof which lies southerly of a line drawn westerly at
an angle of 79 degrees 30 minutes 49 seconds from the east line of said
Lot 12, measured from south to west, from a point therein distant 15.02
feet south of the northeast corner of said Lot 12;
and
Southerly Parcel - That part of the following described property:
Lot 12, Block 1, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 8TH ADDITION, according to the map or plat
12/3/84
on file in the office of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin and
State of Minnesota.
That part of Lot 9, lying Northeasterly of a line drawn from the most
Northerly corner of said lot to a point in the Southeasterly line of said_
lot, distant 15 feet from the most Southeasterly corner thereof, Block 1,
PARKWOOD KNOLLS 8TH ADDITION, according to the map or plat on file in the
office of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota.
Which lies southerly of a line drawn westerly at an angle of 79 degrees
30 minutes 49 seconds from the east line of said Lot 12, measured from south
to west, from a point therein distant 15.02 feet south of the northeast
corner of said Lot 12;
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance
Nos. 801 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is
hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and
Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance
thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose
or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision
that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance
with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval
of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR LOT 6, BLOCK 1, REPLAT OF PART OF GRANDVIEW PLATEAU.
Mr. Hughes presented a petition for division of Lot 6, Block 1, Replat of Part
of Grandview Plateau, advising that the applicant requests a party wall division
of an existing double bungalow. Individual utility connections are not provided
for each unit. The City Building Official reports that a waiver of the separate
utility connection requirement is warranted in this case. Staff would therefore
recommend approval, subject to the issuance of the waiver. No objections being
heard, Member Bredesen offered the following resolution and moved its adoption,
subject to the issuance of a waiver by the Building Official:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land:
Lot 6, Block 1, REPLAT OF PART OF GRANDVIEW PLATEAU, and
WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate
parcels (herein called "Parcels" described as follows:
North Parcel - That part of Lot 6 lying North of a line running from a
.point in the West line of Lot 6, distant 53.98 feet South of the Northwest
corner of Lot 6 to a point in the East line of Lot 6, distant 54.09 feet-
South of the Northeast corner thereof, all in Block 1, REPLAT OF PART OF
GRANDVIEW PLATEAU
and
South Parcel - That part of Lot 6 lying South of a line running from
a point in the West line of Lot 6, distant 53.98 feet South of the North -
west corner of Lot 6 to a point in the East line of Lot 6, distant 54.09
feet South of the Northeast corner thereof, all in Block 1, REPLAT OF PART
OF GRANDVIEW PLATEAU:
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interefere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance
Nos. 801 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is
hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and
Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance
thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose
or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision
that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance
with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval.
of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner,'Courtney
Resolution adopted.
12/3/84
LOT DIVISION, APPROVED FOR LOTS 12 AND 13, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 161.
Mr. Hughes presented the petition for division of Lots 12 and 13, Auditor's Sub-
division No. 161, located at 4412 Grimes Avenue South. The proposed lot division
involves three existing parcels at 45th and Grimes. Parcel A is the applicant's
homesite which fronts on Grimes. Parcel B, which is also owned by the applicant,
fronts on 45th Street and is vacant except for a small garage which has recently
been constructed. Parcel C is the developed single family lot fronting on 45th
Street. The applicant requests a division whereby the westerly 20 feet of Parcel B
will be conveyed.to and attached to Parcel C and the remainder of Parcel B will
be retained by the applicant and attached to Parcel A. A detached accessory
garage is proposed for that part of Parcel B owned by the applicant. The pro-
posed subdivision will result in three non - conforming parcels being combined,to
make two parcels which more closely conform to ordinance requirements. Staff
would therefore recommend approval. No objections being heard, Member Bredesen
introduced the following resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate parcels:
The east 1/2 of Lot 13 and the east 50 feet of the west 100 feet of that
part of Lot 12 lying south of the north 50 feet thereof all in Auditor's
Subdivision No. 161, and
WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide and combine
said tracts into the following described new and separate parcels (herein called
"Parcels "):
Lot 13, except the east 30 feet thereof; That part of Lot 12 lying south
of the north 50 feet thereof, except that part thereof which lies east of
a line drawn parallel with and 30 feet west of the east line of said Lot 13
and its extension; All in Auditor's Subdivision No. 161, Hennepin County,
Minnesota
and
That part of Lots 12 and 13, Auditor's Subdivision No. 161, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, which lies east of a line drawn parallel with and 30 feet west
of the east line of said Lot 13 and its extension. Except the north 50 feet
of that part of said Lot 12.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance
Nos. 801 and-825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is
hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and
Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance
thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose
or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision
that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance
with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval
of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
HEARING DATES SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS. As recommended by staff, Member Bredesen's
motion was seconded by Member Turner, setting December 17, 1984, as hearing date
for the following planning matters:
1) Indian Hills 2nd Addition - R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2,
Double Dwelling Unit District - Generally located west of Gleason and south
of the Crosstown Highway
2) Crossview Lutheran Church - Conditional Use Permit
3) Ordinance No. 812 -A2 - Regulating Construction and Maintenance of Radio and
Television Antennas, Exterior Dish Antennas, and Supporting Towers.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
PORTION OF CONCORD AVENUE VACATED SUBJECT TO CONDITION. Affidavits of Notice were
presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Engineer
Hoffman advised that the request is to vacate a small portion of Concord Avenue
located north of Golf Terrace. He recalled -that at the assessment hearing for
Golf Terrace held on September 17, 1984, the 50 foot right of way for Concord
Avenue which has never been constructed was included in the proposed assessment
to the abutting properties at 4610 and 4700 Golf Terrace. The Council at that
time had indicated that staff should initiate a petition to formally vacate the
subject right of way. Mr. Hoffman stated that this public hearing is being held
to accomplish that objective, that the abutting property owners would be glad to
have the right of way vacated. He noted that Edwin C. Moore, 4610 Golf Terrace,
12/3/84
had questioned whether there was any concern that the right of way be kept open
for future golf course development. Staff's opinion is that if there ever were
future development that access should be by way of Wooddale Avenue and would
therefore recommend that the right of way be vacated. Mr. Hoffman pointed out
that Northern States Power Company and Minnegasco Company have no objection to
the proposed vacation. No response has been received from Northwestern Bell
Telephone Company and the vacation should be granted subject to their approval.
No comment or objections being heard, Member Turner introduced the following
resolution and moved adoption, subject to approval by Northwestern Bell Telephone
Company:
RESOLUTION VACATING PORTION OF RIGHT OF WAY
OF CONCORD AVENUE
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 15th day of October,
1984, fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of portion of
right of way of Concord Avenue; and
WHEREAS, two week's published and posted notice of said hearing was given and
the hearing was held on the 3rd day of December 1984, at which time all persons
desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and
WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the
public that said street vacation be made; and
WHEREAS, the Council has considered the extent to which the vacation affects
existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the
vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality
owning or controlling electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines,
or water pipes, mains and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation,
to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such street or portion thereof
vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, that the following described portion of Concord Avenue be and
is hereby vacated effective as of December 3, 1984:
That portion of Concord Avenue as dedicated in Hansen and Parks 1st
Addition Country Club District and in Golf Terrace Heights Addition
lying between the North line of said Additions and the North line of
Golf Terrace, a street dedicated in said additions.
No easements were involved in said vacation, and the Clerk is authorized and
directed to cause a notice -of completion of proceedings to be prepared, entered
in the transfer record of the County Auditor, and filed with the Register of
Deeds in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Seciton 412.851.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards,.Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
BID AWARDED FOR COLLECTION OF GARBAGE AND REFUSE /CITY PROPERTIES
Mr. Rosland
presented tabulation of bids for collection of garbage and refuse for City
properties, advising that the bid specifications asked the bidders to bid for
both 1985 and an option for 1986. The bids were as follows:
1985 1986
Estimated Estimated
$ per yd Cost $ per yd Cost
BFI $2.29 $12,551.49 $2.47 $13,538.07
Quality Waste Control 2.73 13,202.50 2.95 14,258.70
G & H Sanitation 2.85 15,000.00 3.10 16,100.00
Member Turner = .moved award.of bid.for collection of garbage and__refuse:_for_City.1
properties to recommended low bidder, Browning- Ferris Industries, at $12,551.49
for 1985 and $13,538.07 for 1986. Motion was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
YEAR -END COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULED FOR 12/28/84. As recommended by staff,
Member Schmidt's motion was seconded by Member Turner setting the year -end
Council Meeting for December 28, 1984, at 5:00 p.m.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland called the Council's
attention to the annual list of all Member -at -Large appointments to various
Hennepin County committees with terms commencing at various times throughout the
year. He suggested that names of persons for appointment be given him for for-
warding to the Clerk of the County Board. No action taken.
AMM LEGISLATIVE POLICIES FOR 1985 REVIEWED. Mr. Rosland advised that staff has
reviewed the proposed Legislative Policies for 1985 of the Association of Metro -
politan Municipalities (AMM) and have no objections or significant alterations
to recommend except as follows:
12/3/85
1) Taxi Cab Regulations - Recommend that licensing of drivers and vehicles
together with vehicle inspection be done by the State.
2) Local Government Aids - Advocate an overall reduction in the level of state
support to all local units with a corresponding reduction in the levels of
State taxation as an effort to improve the business climate.
3) Shade Tree Disease Control Program Oppose County funding on the property
tax, and recommend that funding should be a local community decision.
After a.brief discussion thereon, Mr. Rosland stated he would present these
positions at the AM14's General Meeting on December 6, 1984.
I.C.M.A. RETIREMENT PLAN TRUST TO BE CONSIDERED AT NEXT MEETING. Mr. Rosland
advised that staff would like to continue consideration of the I.C.M.A Retire-
ment Plan Trust to the next Council Meeting. Member Schmidt's motion was
seconded by Member Turner to continue the matter to the meeting of December 17.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
COUNTY APPROVES RECOMMENDATION FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS ON VERNON AVENUE. Member Turner
commented that she was pleased to learn that Hennepin County had approved the
City's recommendation for traffic signals on Vernon Avenue and Bren Road and
Hwy. 18.
SHHSC BOARD APPOINTMENT DISCUSSED. Member Turner advised that she had submitted
one name for appointment to the South Hennepin Human Services Council to fill
the vacancy following the resignation of Sally Tang. Mayor Courtney commented
that if not filled sooner, board /commission appointments will be made as of
February 1, 1985.
LETTER FROM LINDA YOHN REGARDING WINE LICENSING NOTED. Member Schmidt noted
that the Council Members had received a letter from Linda Yohn, 6612 Hillside
Lane, stating her opposition to wine licensing for the City.
E. BUSH LAKE ROAD /78TH STREET DISCUSSED. Member Schmidt inquired about the
County's plan for traffic signals at E. Bush Lake Road /78th Street. Mr. Hoffman
advised that the 78th Street corridor has become very busy as a result of all
the development by Bloomington on the north side of #494. Hennepin County intends
to construct signals at E. Bush Lake Road and -78th Street as soon as funds are
available. He added that the City staff has been working with the Bloomington
staff to look at 78th Street with regard to traffic volumes and turning movements.
No action was taken.
DEAD -END SIGN FOR STREET INTO SOUTH HAVEN APARTMENTS DISCUSSED. Mayor Courtney
stated that he had a request from residents living at the South Haven Apartments
to make the "Dead End" sign more conspicuous in an effort to eliminate the entry
and turning around of cars who do not see the sign. Mr. Hoffman responded that
the signage would be checked by staff.
EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TO SPONSOR EDINA DAY AT MINNESOTA TWINS GAME IN JUNE.
Mr. Rosland advised that the Edina Chamber of Commerce is sponsoring an "Edina
Day" at the Minnesota Twins game on June 25, 1985, and is hoping for a large
delegation of residents of the community who will attend.
ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A18 (DOG LICENSE FEE) ADOPTED; SECOND READING WAIVED. Mr. Ros-
land advised that staff would recommend the fee for dog license be increased to
$20.00 per dog or $7.00 per neutered dog, noting that there has been no increase
in these fees for a number of years. Chief Swanson pointed out that the City is
converting to a permanent license number system for dogs and that renewal notices
will be mailed out each year. No objections being heard, Member Bredesen intro-
duced Ordinance No. 171 -A18 and moved adoption with waiver of Second Reading as
follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A18
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 171
TO INCREASE THE FEE FOR DOG LICENSE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. The amount of the following described Fee Number
to Ordinance No. 171 is hereby amended to read as follows:
ORD. SEC.
NO. NO. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT
312 10 Dog license
Sec. 2. This ordinance
passage and publication for
and thereafter.
Motion for adoption of the
of Schedule A
$20.00 per dog or
$7.00 per neutered dog
shall be in full force and effect following
all dog licenses to be effective January 1,
Drdinance was seconded by Member Turner.
FEE NO.
7f
its
1985,
12/3/84
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Richards
Ordinance adopted.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Bredesen for
payment of the following claims as per Pre -List dated 12/3/84: General Fund
$102,106.22, Park Fund $118,451.21, Art Center $1,516.89, Golf Course Fund
$2,869.86, Recreation Center Fund $1,461.29, Gun Range Fund $780.30, Waterwork
Fund $35,938.92, Sewer Rental Fund $20,952.22, Liquor Dispensary Fund $2,034.95,
Construction Fund $1,440.77, Total $287,633.63.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting
adjourned at 7:55 p.m.
City Clerk
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
DECEMBER 17, 1984
Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner and Mayor
Courtney.
EDINA MASONIC LODGE THANKED FOR $1,500 CONTRIBUTION. Stephen Sather and Robert
Soelberg presented a check in the amount of $1,500 to -the City for use by the
Fire Department for rescue equipment, pointing out that this money came from
the proceeds of the Edina Masonic Lodge Annual Pancake Breakfast. The following
resolution was unanimously adopted by the Council and read by Mayor Courtney:
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION
WHEREAS, for the past seven years, the Edina Masonic Lodge has donated money to
the Edina Fire Department for its rescue equipment; and
WHEREAS, this money has been earned by members of the Lodge from their efforts
in putting on an annual Edina Flapjack Festival; and
WHEREAS, a check in the amount of $1,500 has been generously given to the Edina
Fire Department for purchase of rescue equipment;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that most sincere
appreciation be expressed to all members of the Edina Masonic Lodge for its
interest in the well -being of all Edina residents through this generous
contribution; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be entered into the pages of the
Minutes Book of the Edina City Council and that an appropriate copy be presented
to the
EDINA MASONIC LODGE
as a token of the gratitude of the Edina City Council.
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION - JUNE A. SCHMIDT. The following resolution was
unanimously adopted by the Council and read by Mayor Courtney:
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION
WHEREAS, June A.Schmidt has served the residents of the City of Edina as Council
Member for the years 1974 through 1984; and
WHEREAS, June A. Schmidt has also served on the Edina Advisory Board of Health,
the South Hennepin Human Services Council, the'Housing Needs Committee, the
Edina Governmental Commission, the Environmental Quality Commission; and
WHEREAS, June A. Schmidt has been a Commissioner of the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority; and
WHEREAS, she has been particularly sensitive to the health and welfare of the
people of Edina as evidenced by her activities in the various organizations
in which she has been involved; and
WHEREAS, June A. Schmidt is held in high esteem by the residents of the City, as
well as other Members of the City Council and by the City staff;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council, the City staff and
all the residents of Edina hereby express their thanks and appreciation to
JUNE A. SCHMIDT
for her tireless efforts in and sincere dedication to making the City of Edina
an outstanding community.
ADOPTED this 17th day of December, 1984.
Following presentation of the Resolution to Member Schmidt, Member Richards on
behalf of the Council presented her with a silver tray engraved "June A. Schmidt,
Edina City Council, 1974- 1984."
City Manager Rosland then presented her with a silver pen bearing the Edina Logo
and expressed the appreciation of the City staff.for her dedicated service as
Council Member. -
MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of September 17, 1984 and Budget Meetings of
September 10, 17, 24 and 26, 1984, were approved as presented by motion of Member
Turner, seconded by Member Schmidt.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING ON ZONING CHANGE FROM R -1 TO MD- 5 /EDINBOROUGH CONTINUED TO 1/7/85.
As recommended by staff, Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Turner
to continue the public hearing on the zoning change from R -1 Single Dwelling Unit
District to MD -5 Mixed Development District for Edinborough, generally located west
of York Avenue and south of West 76th Street, to the meeting of January 7, 1985.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR INDIAN HILLS 2ND ADDITION (CROSS VIEW CHURCH.
Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file.
Planner Hughes presented the request of Cross View- Lutheran Church for preliminary
approval of the revised plat of Indian Hills 2nd Addition, generally located west
of Gleason Road and south of the Crosstown Highway. He recalled that on June 18,
12/17/84
1984, the Council gave preliminary plat approval for a seven lot R -2 District
subdivision of that portion of the Cross-View Lutheran Church property which adjoins
McCauley Trail. The applicants are now requesting a modification of the approved
preliminary plat for the purpose of subdividing..an additional portion of the Church
property. The revised plat shows the seven R -2 lots fronting on McCauley Trail as
originally approved, plus eight lots which front on a new cul de sac which extends
southerly from McCauley Trail. These eight new lots are proposed to remain R -1,
Single Dwelling Unit District. These lots range from 11,850 square feet to 20,700
square feet and most of these lots are 100 feet in width. He noted that Lot 1,
Block 1, of the proposed plat measures five acres in area and would be retained by
the Church. A conditional use permit has been applied for by the Church to facili-
tate a proposed expansion. The Community Development and Planning Commission reviewed
the revised plat at their November 28, 1984 meeting and recommended approval of the
subdivision subject to the same conditions as the original proposal: 1) subdivision
dedication, 2) signed developer's agreement which .includes the extension of sanitary
sewer mains and the extension of a storm sewer, 3) conservation restriction covering
the wetland area, 4) grant of easements to facilitate storm sewer.extensions, 5) grant
of D.N.R. permit, and 6) petition to install permanent street surfacing and curb and
gutter on McCauley Trail West abutting the R -2 lots and the church site. Mr. Hughes
noted that Charles Sedgwick and Cal Kuhlman of the Church's building committee were
present to answer questions. No questions or comments being heard, Member Bredesen
introduced the following resolution and moved adoption; subject to conditions as
outlined by staff./
RESOLUTION FOR REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL
OF INDIAN HILLS 2ND ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain
revised plat entitled "Indian Hills 2nd Addition ", platted by Gustafson and Associates,
a Minnesota Corporation, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of
December 17, 1984, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVED FOR CROSS VIEW. LUTHERAN CHURCH (6645 McCAULEY TRAIL).
Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered - placed on file.
Mr. Hughes presented the request of Cross View Lutheran Church, 6645 McCauley Trail,
for a conditional use permit for the purpose of constructing a 12,000 square foot,
two -story addition. The proposed addition will be located on the east side of the
existing building in an area partially occupied by an unsurfaced parking area. The
first level of the proposed addition would contain classrooms and related facilities
for Sunday School use. The second level would contain a large meeting room, lounge,
a kitche, and storage areas. The existing sanctuary which contains pew seating for
about 300 would remain unchanged. A new 62 -car parking lot would be constructed to .:...
the south of the proposed addition. Plans show an expansion potential of 48 addi-
tional parking spaces which would be constructed if more seating is provided in the
sanctuary in the future. Total parking complies with the requirements of the Zoning
Ordinance. At its meeting of November 28, 1985, the Planning Commission recommended
approval of the conditional use permit, subject to receipt-of-suitable grading and
landscape plans. Mr. Hughes advised that those plans have been submitted and have
been reviewed by staff. Additional conditions were that building materials for the
addition must match existing materials, the church must be connected to sanitary
sewer in- conjunction with the expansion, and that no additional seating can be
provided in the sanctuary without the construction of additional parking. No comment
being heard, Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject
to conditions as outlined by staff:
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
WHEREAS ", the procedural requirements of Ordinance No. 825 (The Zoning Ordinance)
have been met, and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Findings as required by Ordinance No. 825
have been satisfied;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby grants a Conditional
Use Permit to Cross View Lutheran Church, at 6645 McCauley Trail, for the purpose of
constructing a 12,000 square foot, two -story addition to their existing building,
according to plans submitted;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Permit be subject to the following conditions:
1) Building materials for the addition must match the existing materials.
2) The .Church must be connected to sanitary sewer in conjunction with the expansion.
3) No additional seating can be provided in the sanctuary without the construction of
additional parking.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Richards.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
12/17/84
ORDINANCE NO. 812 -A2 (ANTENNAS) GRANTED FIRST READING. Planner Craig Larsen
presented Ordinance No. 812 -A2 To Regulate Construction /Maintenance of Tele-
communication, Television and Radio Antennas, Dish Antennas and Supporting
Towers, for First Reading advising that the amendment is proposed to 1) revise
some of the requirements in the ordinance and make the language more understand-
able and in conformity with the new Zoning Ordinance, and 2) to establish a
standard for dealing with dish antennas. The proposed amendment would replace
all sections of the existing ordinance except for Section 5 which establishes a
15 -year period amortization for existing non - conforming antennas and Section 9
which provides for removal of abandonned towers or six months of non -use.
Mr. Larsen pointed out that the amendment would establish general standards for
all zoning districts; requirements for the R -1 and R -2 Districts and for all
other zoning districts. He then reviewed the general requirements under the
proposed amendment, the requirements for residential purposes in the R -1 and
R -2 District and the requirements for all other zoning districts. He stated
that he has met with several installers of satellite dish antennas and also
several local ham radio operators and they have raised no objections to the pro-
posed amendment. Mr. Rosland emphasized that adoption of the proposed ordinance
would allow the installation of 12 -foot dish antennas in rear yards of residences.
Member Turner stated that with the rapid development of the technology in this
field, more than two dish antennas may be needed in the future for zoning districts
other than R -1 and R -2, but that she felt the restriction to two is appropriate
at this time. No other comment being heard, Member Turner offeredOrdinance
No. 812 -A2 for First Reading as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 812 -A2
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINACE NO. 812 TO REGULATE
CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF TELECOMMUNICATION,
TELEVISION AND RADIO ANTENNAS, EXTERIOR DISH ANTENNAS
AND SUPPORTING TOWERS, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 1 of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby amended to read as follows:
"Section 1. Definitions. Words and phrases used in this ordinance which are
defined in Ordinance No. 825, as amended from time to time, (said ordinance,
as amended from time to time, is herein called the "Zoning Ordinance "), shall
be construed herein according to their definitions contained in the Zoning
Ordinance. The following words and terms shall have the following meanings
in this ordinance:"
(a) Antenna: equipment used for transmitting or receiving telecommunication,
television or radio signals, which is located on the exterior of, or outside
of, any building or structure, and includes a dish antenna.
(b) Dish Antenna: a parabolic shaped antenna (including all supporting
apparatus) which is used for receiving telecommunication, television or
radio signals, which is located on the exterior of, or outside of, any
.building or structure.
(c) Tower: any pole, spire or structure, or any combination thereof, to
which an antenna is attached, or which is designed for an antenna to be
attached, and all supporting lines, cables, wires and braces."
Sec. 2. Sec. -2.of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby amended to read as follows:
"Sec. 2. Permit Required; Exemptions. No antenna or tower of any kind
shall hereafter be erected, constructed or placed, or re- erected, reconstructed
or replaced, anywhere within the City without first making an application for
and obtaining from the City a permit therefor.
(a) Exemptions. No permit shall be required for the following:
.,(i) Dish antennas not greater than 30 inches in diameter or five
square feet in cross sectional area, which do not exceed six feet in
height.
(ii) All other towers or antennas which do not exceed six feet in
height.
(iii) Antennas and towers erected or constructed by the City for City
purposes."
Sec. 3. Sec. 3 or Ordinance No. 812 is hereby amended to read as follows:
"Sec. 3. Application for Permit; Issuance; Fees. Application for a permit
required by this Ordinance shall be made to the Building Official in the same
manner, and containing the same information, as for a building permit pursuant
to Ordinance No. 406, as amended from time to time, and the Minnesota State
Building Code thereby adopted. Such permit shall be issued by the Building
Official. For a permit required by this ordinance, an application fee as set
forth in Ordinance No. 171 shall be required for the purpose of defraying the
cost of inspecting the installation and maintenance of such antennas, dish
antennas and towers."
Sec. 4. Sec. 4 or Ordinance No. 812 is hereby divided into three sections,
being Sec. 4, 5 and 6, and is hereby amended to read as follows:
"Sec. 4. General Requirements. All antennas, towers and dish antennas,
including supporting wires, for which a permit is required shall comply with
the following requirements:
12/17/84
(a) All applicable provisions of Ordinance No. 406, including wind
loading - requirements set forth in the Minnesota Building Code thereby
adopted, as such ordinance shall be amended from time to time.
(b) Antennas and towers shall be grounded for protection against a direct
strike by lightning and shall comply, as to electrical wiring and connect-
ions, with all applicable City and state statutes, regulations and
standards.
(c) No antenna or tower shall exceed a height equal to the distance from
the base of the antenna and tower to the nearest overhead electrical power
line (except individual service drops), less five feet.
(d) Antennas or towers shall be protected to discourage climbing by
unauthorized persons.
(e) No antenna or tower shall have affixed to it in any way any lights,
reflectors, flashers or other illuminating device, or any signs, banners
or placards of any kind, except one sign.not over 10 square inches
indicating the name of the manufacturer and /or installer.
(f) No tower shall have constructed thereon, or attached thereto, in any
way, any platform, catwalk, crow's nest or similar structure.
(g) All towers shall: be constructed of corrosive - resistant steel or other
corrosive - resitant, non - combustible materials. Towers shall not be con-
structed or made of wood, including timbers or logs.
(h) No part of any antenna or tower, nor any lines, cables, equipment,
wires or braces used in connection with any tower or antenna shall, at
any time, extend across or over any part'of a street, sidewalk or alley."
Sec. 5. Location.
(a) In all Zoning Districts as established by the Zoning Ordinance:
(i) No part of any tower or antenna shall be constructed, located
or maintained, at any time, permanently or temporarily, within any
setback required by the Zoning Ordinance for an accessory building or
structure for the Zoning District in which the antenna or tower is
located. If no accessory building or structure setback is provided
by the Zoning Ordinance, the antenna or tower shall maintain all
setbacks required by the Zoning Ordinance for principal buildings
or structures.
(b) Additional requirements for lots in the R -1 and R -2 Zoning Districts
as established by the Zoning Ordinance:
(i), Dish antennas greater than 30 inches in diameter shall :not.be
located on the roof-of a.principal or.accessory building.
(ii),-Dish antennas shall only be located in rear yards.
(iii). No antennas or towers shall be located in the front yard."
Sec. 6. Height Restrictions. .
(a) In the R -1 and R -2 Zoning Districts as established by the Zoning
Ordinance:
(i) No ground mounted tower shall be in excess of 50 feet in height,
measured from the ground elevation at the base of the tower to the
highest point of the tower.
(ii) Towers mounted to a building or structure shall not extend over
25 feet above the highest point of the roof of the building or structure.
(iii) Antennas shall not extend more than 15 feet above the highest
point of a tower. Antennas not mounted on a tower shall not be in
excess of 15 feet high, measured from the highest point of the roof of
the building to which the antenna is attached to the highest point of
the antenna, or from the ground elevation at the base of the antenna
to the highest point of the antenna.
(iv) Dish antennas shall not be in excess of 15 feet in height,
measured from the ground elevation at the base of the antenna to the
highest point of the antenna.
(v) Dish antennas not greater than 30 inches in diameter, which may
be mounted on the roof pursuant to this ordinance, shall not exceed six
feet in height, measured from the point at which the antenna is mounted
to the roof to the highest point of the antenna.
(b) In all other Zoning Districts as established by the Zoning Ordinance:
(i) No antenna, tower or antenna with tower shall exceed 75 feet in
height from the base of the antenna to the highest point of the antenna
or tower, whichever is higher.
(ii) Dish antennas shall have an overall height of no more than
26 feet for either a ground mount or roof mount.
Sec. 6. Sec. 6 (Lights and Signs; Crow's Nests) of Ordinance No. 812 is
.hereby deleted in its entirety.
Sec. 7. Sec. 7 of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby renumbered Sec. 8 and is
amended to read as follows:
"Sec. 8. Number of Towers and Antennas Allowed.
(a) In the R -1 and R -2 Zoning Districts as established by the Zoning
Ordinance: no more than one exempt antenna, as defined in Sec. 2(a)
of this ordinance, one dish antenna and one tower requiring a permit
12/17/84
under the provisions of this ordinance shall be allowed at any one
time on any single lot.
(b) In other Districts zoned residential by the Zoning Ordinance:
no more than one exempt antenna, as defined in Sec. 2(a) of this
ordinance, one dish antenna and one tower requiring a permit under the
provisions of this ordinance shall be allowed at any one time on any
single tract.
(c) In all Districts zoned other than residential by the Zoning
Ordinance: no more than one exempt antenna as defined in Sec. 2(a)
of this ordinance, one tower over 20 feet in height, and two dish
antennas shall be allowed at any one time on any single tract."
Sec. 8. Sec. 8 of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby renumbered Sec. 9 and is
amended to read as follows:
"Sec. 9. Variances. Variances from the literal provisions of this ordinance
shall be processed and granted or denied in the same manner as variances are
handled under Ordinance No. 825."
Sec. 9. Sec. 9 of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby renumbered Sec. 10 and is
amended to read as follows:
"Sec. 10. Abandoned Antennas and Towers; Removal. Any antenna or tower
which is not used for six successive months, commencing after the effective
date of this ordinance, shall be deemed abandoned and may be required to
be removed in the same manner and pursuant to the same procedures as for
dangerous or unsafe buildings established by Ordinance No. 471 or by
Ordinance No. 406, as such ordinances are amended from time to time, or
by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 463.15 to 463.26, as amended."
Sec. 10. Sec. 10 of Ordinance No. 812 is hereby renumbered Sec. 11 and is
amended to read as follows:
"Sec. 11. Violation; Penalty.
(a) Misdemeanor. Any person who shall violate any provision of this
ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to penalties
pursuant to Ordinance No. 175, as amended.
(b) Other Remedies. In addition to the penalties imposed by Ordinance
No. 175, as amended, the City may exercise, with or separately from such
penalties, all and any other legal and equitable remedies then available
to the City by this ordinance, or by statute, or other ordinances of the
City, or by applicable rules or regulations, to enforce this ordinance,
including, without limitation, injunction.
(d) Costs of Enforcement. The person or persons violating this ordinance
shall be jointly and severally liable for all costs incurred by the City
in enforcing this ordinance against such persons, including, without
limitation, attorneys' fees, witness fees and administrative expenses,
with interest on such fees and expenses from the dates incurred until
paid at the highest rate then allowed by law, and if no maximum rate be
established by law, then at twelve (12 %) percent per annum, and shall
also be jointly and severally liable for all costs, including attorneys'
fees, of collecting such fees, expenses and interest, with interest on
such costs of collection from the dates incurred until paid, at the same
rate as is payable on such fees and expenses."
Sec. 11. Sec. 11 (Partial Invalidity) and Sec. 12 (Interpretation) of
Ordinance No. 812 are hereby renumbered Sec. 12 and Sec. 13, respectively.
Sec. 12. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon
its passage and publication.
REPORT GIVEN ON REDEVELOPMENT OF.BILTMORE MOTEL SITE. Mr. Hughes recalled that
the Biltmore Motel site was rezoned several months ago and subsequently the
Council has reviewed alternate plans for the site on several occasions. The latest
plan proposed 88 condominium units for the site. The applicant, Johnson Building
Company, reports that he has been unable to finance this project and has asked
that the City consider as an alternative a rental building designed for the elderly.
To this end, Johnson Building Company has joined with the Stuart Corporation to
pursue such a development. Mr. Hughes advised that staff has met with Johnson
and Stuart to discuss the proposal. The project is nearly identical to the elderly
high -rise proposed for Edinborough, i.e. a market rate rental building with 20%
of the units rented at lower rates for moderate income tenants. Congregate dining
and other services may also be provided. The developers are requesting that the
City /HRA consider assisting the development through: 1) the issuance of Housing
Revenue Bonds (tax exempt financing similar to Industrial Development Bonds) and
2) a land write -down and /or an annual interest rate reduction payment to lower
interest costs of the project thereby reducing rents to a competitive level.
These financing mechanisms are identical to those proposed for the Edinborough
project. Staff has advised the developers that prior to preparing a specific plan
and proposal for the project, the Council /HRA should conceptually review the
financing mechanisms noted above. Staff has noted to them that, despite the
Council's concept approval of Edinborough, the City is philosophically opposed to
12/17/84
tax exempt financing and assisting market rate housing. Staff also advised that
Council may not equate this project with Edinborough which provides a broad range
of housing types and substantial public participation in many facets of the deve-
lopment. Mr. Hughes pointed out that staff has also expressed concern with two
other aspects of the project. First, is concern as to whether a market exists
for a market rate rental project of this type in light of Edinborough and other
similar projects in the area. The developers have submitted a housing need assess-
ment to support their view that such housing is needed. Staff feels additional
research is needed to verify the feasibility of this project. Second, is concern
that the developers have paid a premium for the site which should not now be under-
written by the City. The value of this site must also be carefully analyzed prior
to City participation in the project. Mr. Hughes asked that the Council review
this preliminary proposal and provide direction as to financial involvement in
this project, particularly as it relates to the issuance of Housing Revenue Bonds.
Mr. Hughes introduced Bob Johnson, President of Johnson Building Company and
Stuart Nolan, of the Stuart Corporation. Mr. Johnson summarized that they have
gone through two different condominium proposals for the site and have expended
a lot of time, money and energy without results and therefore are proposing this
concept which may be the best proposal of all. He noted that condominiums in
the metropolitan area basically have a zero absorption rate, that no units have
been sold since last August when their second proposal was approved, and that
as a result lenders are not looking favorably on condominiums and have stopped
lending on such projects. He noted that he had been approached by a number of
persons on the concept of doing an elderly housing project because the site would
be ideal. In support thereof, Mr. Johnson advised that they have had a preli-
minary assessment of housing needs for the elderly in Edina prepared and have
joined with Stuart Corporation who are experienced in development and management
of elderly housing projects. Mr. Nolan, Stuart Corporation, reiterated that the
site would be ideal for the proposed elderly housing project. He stated that
during the last five and six years very little market rate housing has been-con-
structed in the metropolitan area as developers were interested in construction
of apartments. However, once Section 8 funds have been withdrawn by the federal
government there has been almost no new apartment construction starts. From
past experience, he stated he knew of no other way to get a project such as this
going without the tax exempt financing by issuance of Housing Revenue Bonds.
With regard to land write -down, Mr. Nolan stated that the price paid for the land
by Johnson Building Company was predicated on a commercial purpose. The present
taxes on the land are in the $30,000 range. The project proposed is for a
152 -unit apartment building which would yield taxes of approximately $150,000.
He noted further that the 152 units as proposed would fit within the general
scope and size of the building proposed prior. Member Turner pointed out that
on the issue of Housing Revenue Bonds, the Council gave concept approval for
Edinborough on the basis that the total project will achieve several of the
goals in the Comprehensive Plan having to do not only with elderly housing but
some modest cost ownership opportunities, some transportation issues, etc. Out-
side of the Fairview - Southdale Hospital bonds, Member Turner pointed out that
the Council has not approved tax exempt financing and have looked for a clear
public purpose in doing such. Planner Larsen advised that the goal in the
Comprehensive Plan when adopted was for 350 new construction elderly units
under Section 8 funding and that the Plan showed this as one of the locations
that would be appropriate for elderly housing. In this proposed project, the
units are primarily market rate units with a percentage of those units being
proposed to be reserved under the Section 8 guidelines. Mr. Nolan commented
that he understood the City desired to provide housing alternatives for its
senior citizens in hopes that some would move from their homes thereby recycling
them,to families.and that the proposed project would provide that alternative.
He added that Congress also questione& the wisdom of tax exempt financing and
during this past year they acted on the issue and severely limited it for com-
mercial and industrial uses but preserved tax exempt financing for rental
apartments without limitation. Mr. Rosland pointed out that other projects
were under consideration to capture the tax increment in that district for other
public benefits.and that staff had some concern for those probable commitments.
Member Schmidt commented that the proposed elderly housing project may draw .
people from the northerly part of the City as well as from Hopkins who may buy
into the project. Member Bredesen submitted that in addition to his qualms
about public subsidy going to a project of which only 20% of the units would
be reserved for people of low and moderate income, he was concerned about the
number of units proposed and the.additional traffic it would create in the
area and would therefore be reluctant to move ahead with the proposal. In
response, Mr. Johnson submitted that in Edina there is no choice of housing for .
people in certain income levels, noting that there is an 8 -year waiting list at
7500 York Avenue and that there would be public.purpose served when people
are presently displeased with the housing opportunities that are offered now.
He added that he felt an elderly housing project would have the lowest traffic
impact of any possible use for the site. Member Turner stated that although
she would like to see a housing project on the site and has supported all
12/17/85
efforts on elderly housing in Edina, she was reluctant to support approval of
another tax exempt financing.project until we could see how Edinborough goes
and further, that she was concerned about the cost of the site and for those
reasons could not support the proposed project. Member Richards stated he too
had serious concerns about tax increment financing, and that the proposal may
be worthwhile to consider but that he was not ready to support it at this time.
Member Bredesen commented that if the developers proceed on the proposed concept
they do so with the risk that he could not support it but would be interested
in seeing more about the project. Member Schmidt abstained from commenting.
Mayor Courtney submitted that he felt it was an ideal plan for the site although
he recognized there is hesitation on the method to be used for financing. He
stated that we have not thought too much about people in Edina who could afford
housing of this type and who would like to remain in Edina. Mayor Courtney
added that we should have a chance to study the proposal a bit longer. Member
Richards suggested that the developers come back in the middle of January with
a straight market rate proposal through the Planning Commission process as he
felt there are some points in the project to stimulate Council's thinking on the
issues. Mr. Nolan stated that he would become uninvolved with the project at
this point. No formal action was taken.
PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON REVENUE SHARING FUNDS FOR 1985 ENTITLEMENT PERIOD 16.
Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file.
Mr. Rosland advised that a public hearing was held on November 7, 1984, for the
purpose of receiving written and oral comments from the public concerning the
1985 annual budget and the proposed use of revenue sharing funds. No comment
was received at that time. Staff would recommend approval of the funds as speci-
fied in the 1985 budget. No objections being heard, Member Schmidt offered the
following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING
1985 REVENUE SHARING ENTITLEMENT PERIOD 15 BUDGET
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that it does hereby approved the follow-
ing budget for the 1985 Revenue Sharing Entitlement Period 16:
REVENUES
Source
Amount
Property Taxes
$6,653,337
Sales Taxes
550,787
Service Charges /User Fees /Other
1,132,740
Licenses and Permits
397,600
Fines and Penalties
325,000
Income from Other Governments
304,905
Federal General Revenue Sharing
225,000
$9,589,369
EXPENDITURES
Activity GRS Funds
Other Funds
Education
-0-
-0-
Police $125,000
$2,345,963
$2,470,963
Fire 100,000
1,373,840
1,473,840
Roads /Transport /Public Works
2,676,246
2,676,246
Sewers /Sanitation
96,700
96,700
Libraries
-0-
-0-
Parks /Recreation
1,156,959
1,156,959
Health /Hospitals
207,523
207,523
Social Services /Welfare
53,360
53,360
General Administration _.
922,693
922.693
Financial Administration /Debt Service
451,085
451,085
Reserve for Contingencies -
80,000
80,000
.$225,000
$9,364,369
$9,589,369
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded
by Member Bredesen.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
AWARD OF BID FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF 1974 FORD PIRSCH L9000 PUMPER CONTD TO 1/7/85.
As recommended by staff, Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Turner
to continue the award of bid for reconstruction of 1974 Ford Pirsch L9000 to
the meeting of January 7, 1985.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF December 11, 1984, APPROVED. Mr. Hoffman
advised that in November a petition has been signed by residents of Arden Avenue
requesting the installation of "STOP" signs at Country Club Road at Arden Avenue.
Concerns of the residents as presented to the Traffic Safety Committee was the
amount of traffic using the street as a shortcut, speeds, lack of defined right
of way at the intersection, safety of small children and apparent reckless
12/17/84
driving by some individuals. The Committee took action that an original /desti-
nation study be done on Arden and that the results be reported at the December
meeting. Mr. Hoffman stated that a license plate survey was conducted in the
area at three different times and he presented the results of the survey together
with other major findings. Based on the findings of the survey, the Committee
at its December 11 meeting recommended denial of the request. It also recommended
that - informing the broader neighborhood of the local problem might be a benefit
that could be accomplished by the mailing or distribution of a flyer. Mr. Hoff-
man stated that a resident at 4637 Arden Avenue had phoned today stating he was
opposed to the "STOP" sign. Speaking in. support of the request for installation
of "STOP" signs were: Kathleen Sanberg, 4617 Arden Avenue; Randy and Karen Jones,
4616 Arden Avenue, and Jeff Keys, 4646 Arden Avenue. The main concern expressed
was the excessive speed by vehicles on Arden Avenue. Following lengthy discussion
regarding the issues, Mr. Hoffman stated that traffic safety is comprised of
three processes: 1) education, 2) enforcement, and 3) engineering and that the
educational process has worked in other areas of the City when traffic problems
arose. Member Turner suggested that we make an attempt to educate the 60 -70%
of the drivers who use Arden Avenue by means of a mailed notice identifying the
problem and if that does not work then to consider other solutions. Mr. Rosland
said that the notices would be sent and then a speed survey would be made after
the mailing to see if there is a reduction of speed. He assured the residents
that staff would continue to work with them towards a solution. Motion of Member
Bredesen was then seconded by Member Schmidt to approve the following recommended
action as listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of
December 11, 1984:
1) Installation of "NO U- TURN" sign for southbound Valley View Road at approxi-
mately West 65th Street cross -over,
and to acknowledge Sections B and C.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST AGREEMENT RESOLUTION ADOPTED. Mr. Rosland advised that
upon adoption of the International City Management Association (ICMA) deferred
compensation plan in 1976 or 1977 by the City, approximately three or four
employees enrolled in the plan. Subsequently,.the State of Minnesota approved
additional deferred compensation plans which have been actively marketed with
City employees. There are presently no active members on the ICMA Plan. However,
there is at least one current employee that does have funds in the Plan and
therefore it is recommended that a resolution be adopted which would allow the
City of Edina to enter into the new trust agreement established by ICMA Retire-
ment Corporation, with the only difference between the prior arrangement and
the arrangement requested by the resolution is establishment of a Board of
Trustees to oversee the operation of the funds. Upon adoption of the resolution,
participants will be able to select members for the Board. Member Richards
introduced the following resolution, moving adoption:
..RESOLUTION OF.CITY OF EDINA, MN
WHEREAS, the City of Edina, Minnesota, (the "Employer ") maintains a deferred
compensation plan for its employees which is administered by the ICMA Retirement
Corporation (the "Administrator "); and
WHEREAS, other public employers have joined together to establish the ICMA Retire-
ment Trust for the purpose of representing the interests of the participating
employers with respect to the collective investment of funds held under their
deferred compensation plans; and
WHEREAS, said Trust is a salutary development which further advances the quality
of administration for plans administered by the ICMA Retirement Corporation;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Employer hereby executes the ICMA
Retirement Trust, attached hereto; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager shall be the coordinator for this
program and shall receive necessary reports, notices, etc. from the ICMA Retire-
ment Corporation as Administrator, and shall cast, on behalf of the Employer,
any required votes under the program. Administrative duties to carry out the
plan may be assigned to the appropriate departments.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING CONTRACT FOR 1985 DISCUSSED; CONTINUED.. Mr.. Rosland
advised that the proposed agreement for Public Health Nursing Services for 1985
whereby the Bloomington Division of Public Health has agreed to provide the
service to Edina residents at a cost of $78,560.00 has been reviewed by staff.
This is $740.00 less than the 1984 contract due to the $5,000 reduction in funding.
He noted that at this time it is not known which service areas will be reduced
to offset the reduced funding. Member Bredesen suggested that the staff contact
the Bloomington Division of Public Health regarding possible service areas that
12/17/84
may be reduced and to bring that information back to the Council before the
contract is approved. Mr. Rosland stated that staff would follow through on
the request. No action was taken.
HEARING DATE SET FOR FRANCE AVENUE PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVAL & VARIANCE REQUEST.
Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Schmidt, setting January 7, 1985,
as the public hearing date for the France Avenue Preliminary Plan Approval and
Variance Request for improvement of the street.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY BOARD APPOINTMENTS DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland
recalled that in September the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners had approved
a Structure and Compositon Plan for a Hennepin County Community Action Agency to
serve suburban and rural Hennepin County as the vehicle to access funding for
services to County residents. He noted that the Edina City Council has submitted
a resolution to the County Board recommending that the Suburban Human Services
Councils be designated at the Community Action Agency. The Board is now in the
process of recruitment and selection of the initial Board of Directors which will
consist of nine public officials (three Hennepin County Commissioners and six
elected suburban officials), nine representatives from the private sector, and
nine members of the low- income population and has asked that suburban council
members consider applying for these positions. Following discussion that Edina
should make a nomination to the Board, Mayor Courtney-stated he would be willing
to have his name placed in nomination. It was informally agreed by the Council
that Mayor Courtney be nominated. Mr. Rosland stated he would make contacts in
support of Mayor Courtney's nomination. No formal action taken.
APPOINTMENT OF BARBARA REYNOLDS TO COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES COMMITTEE
REPORTED. Mr. Rosland reported that Barbara Reynolds, Chairman of the Edina
Advisory Health Board, has been appointed to the Hennepin County Community Health
Services Committee, following nomination by the Third District Nursing Association.
REVISION OF FINDINGS OF FACT /VICTORSEN'S VALLEY VIEW 2ND ADDITION APPROVED.
Mr. Hughes recalled that at its meeting of December 3, 1984, the Council had
denied the preliminary plat of Victorsen's Valley View 2nd Addition, based on
the Findings, Decisions and Reasons prepared by staff. He commented that two.
minor changes to the document are recommended which.should have been noted on
December 3 and presented the changes to the Council. Member Bredesen moved
approval of the following changes to the Findings, Decisions and Reasons regarding
Victorsen's Valley View 2nd Addition:
1) Revision of the introduction to show that Folke R. and Veown M. Victorsen,
proponents, and Thomas H. Goodman, attorney for the proponents, were not
present at the December 3, 1984, hearing.
2) The last sentence of paragraph 5. on page 4 should read, "No record exists
that the Edina City Council approved the subdivision of the Subject Property,
which resulted from the 1956 acquisition by Southdale Center, Inc. as required
by Minnesota Statutes'and City Ordinances."
Motion was seconded by Member Turner.
Member-Richards noted that Mr. and Mrs. Victorsen were present and asked if they
would speak.to the proposed Findings. Folke Victorsen replied, "No comment."
Rollcall:.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
COUNCIL /EDINAMITE BENEFIT WINTER PARTY DATE SET. Member Turner announced that the
date of Sunday, February 10, 1985, has been set for the Council hosted Edinamite
Winter Party and asked the Council Members to mark their calendars. Detailed
planning will take place after January 1.
BREDESEN PARK DEVELOPMENT PROGRESS REPORT PRAISED. Member Turner stated she was
very pleased with the progress report
appreciated the effort in updating the
on the development of Bredesen Park and
Council Members on the project.
NOMINEE FOR APPOINTMENT TO EDINA ADVISORY BOARD OF HEALTH NOTED. Member Richards
submitted the name of Dr. Catherine Niewoidner for possible appointment to the
Edina Advisory Board of Health when a vacancy occurs and asked that the name be
kept on file by the Clerk's office. Member Turner commented that Barbara Reynolds,
Chairman of the Advisory Board of Health, is hoping that a joint meeting of the
Council and the Board can be scheduled in the near future. Mr. Rosland replied
that he is working on a schedule of meetings for off - Monday nights and will work
that into the roster.
WOODDALE SCHOOL SITE HEARING PROCESS REVIEWED. Mr. Rosland reminded the Council
of the proposed process regarding consideration of the Wooddale School Site.
11 /17/84
Two informational meetings for residents of the area and interested citizens
will be conducted by the consulting firm of BRW on Tuesday, January 8 and
January 15, 1985, at the Wooddale School building, beginning at 7 p.m. at which
the consultants would present their report and recommendations for the Wooddale
site. Notices of.the meetings will be sent to area residents and the Heritage
Presentation Board. A public hearing then would.be scheduled for February 4,
1985, following publication and mailing lof notice as required, at which the
public could be heard. Member Bredesen suggested that any visual aids such
as graphics be used to help the public understand the recommendations of the
consultants. No action was taken.
REQUEST FOR AID IN PICK -UP /DISTRIBUTION OF SURPLUS FOOD DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland
advised that a request has been made through Member Turner, from Colonial Church
of Edina for assistance by City staff in picking up and distributing to drop -off
points the monthly surplus food allotment for Edina residents. After brief
discussion, it was decided to offer the assistance this time and bring back more
details regarding the time involved, etc., and the role of South Hennepin Human
Services Council in the program. No formal action taken.
VARIOUS PETITIONS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REFERRED TO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FOR
PROCESSING. Mr. Rosland advised that several petitions have been received for
public improvements and recommended that they be referred to the Engineering
Department for processing. Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member
Schmidt, to refer the following petitions to the Engineering Department for
routine processing:
1) Petition for Permanent Street Surfacing and Curb - Valley View Road between
Mark Terrace and McCauley Trail.
2) Petition for Sidewalk - West 492 Street between France Avenue and City Ramp.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
PETITION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PARKING LOT AT EDINA COMMUNITY CENTER REFERRED TO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & PLANNING COMMISSION. Mr. Rosland advised that the
School District has petitioned the City Council to.-enlarge parking lot areas at
the Edina Community Center with the cost of the parking facilities to be paid
for primarily by the Community Center. As was done previously, they have asked
the City to absorb the cost of curb and gutter removal, fence and post removal,
necessary clearing of the area, etc. in addition to assuming all engineering and
clerical costs as service to the community. The City will also provide project
supervision working with a school liaison contact. Mr. Rosland pointed out that
the first step would be the processing -of a Conditional Use Permit through the
Community Development and Planning Commission and public hearing process. Motion
of Member Richards was seconded by Member Bredesen to refer the matter.to the
Planning Commission to be considered at their January meeting and to be brought
back to the Council for public hearing on a Conditional Use Permit in February.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
I
DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE DIRECTOR TO SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY DESIGNATED. Member
Turner introduced the following resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION DESIGNATINGIDIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE
DIRECTOR TO SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of thejCity of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
J. N. Dalen is hereby designated to servelas a director of the Suburban Rate
Authority, and John Wallin is hereby designated to serve as alternate director
of the Suburban Rate Authority for the year 1985.and until their successors are
appointed.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Schmidt.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
i
I
DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE TO LOGIS DESIGNATED. Member Bredesen offered the following
resolution and moved its adoption::
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE
DIRECTOR TO!LOGIS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the!City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
Kenneth E. Rosland is hereby designated'as Director of LOGIS and J. N. Dalen
is hereby designated as.- Alternate Director of LOGIS for the year 1985 and until
their successors are appointed. I
Motion for adoption of the resolution was ;seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
l
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
12/17/84
EDINA SUN - CURRENT DESIGNATED AS OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER FOR 1985. Member Bredesen
introduced the following resolution, moving adoption:
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER FOR 1985
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the Edina Sun - Current be and is
hereby designated as the Official Newspaper for the City of-Edina for the year
1985.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Richards.
Rollcall: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED FOR ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS /EDINBOROUGH. Attorney Erickson
explained that it is recommended that the Council adopt a resolution relating to
the issuance of revenue bonds for the proposed Edinborough project and giving
preliminary approval to the development. There are rumors about new legislation
being proposed which might make these bonds unuseable and that adoption of the
resolution would protect the option for the City if they wish to issue revenue
bonds. He pointed out that the City will retain the right to withdraw from
participation and to not issue the bonds if they so determine. No comment being
heard, Member Richards introduced the following resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS
PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 462C, MINNESOTA STATUTES,
FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT AND GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE DEVELOPMENT
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City)
as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. By the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended
(the "Act "), the City is authorized to plan, administer, issue and sell revenue
bonds or obligations to make or purchase loans to finance one or more multifamily
housing developments within its boundaries which revenue bonds or obligations
shall be payable solely from the revenues of the development or other security
pledged therefor.
1.02. Representatives of Partners for Senior Communities, Inc., an Illinois
corporation (the "Corporation "), have advised this Council of its desire to form
a Minnesota limited partnership in which the Corporation or one or more of its
principals will be general partners (the "Developer "), to acquire one or more
parcels of land located within the geographical limits of the City in the
southernmost portion of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan Area to construct
and equip thereon a multifamily rental apartment building containing approximately
203 units, together with parking and related and subordinate tacilities (the
"Development "). The Development is intended primarily for occupancy by elderly
persons. Total development and financing costs are presently estimated by the
Corporation to be approximately $17,000,000.
1.03. The Corporation has requested that the City issue its revenue bonds
in one or more series (the "Bonds ") pursuant to the authority of the Act in such
aggregate principal amount as may be necessary to finance all or a portion of
the costs of the Development and make the proceeds of the Bonds available to the
Developer, directly or indirectly, for the acquisition, construction and equipping
of the Development, subject to agreement by the Developer or other entity to pay
promptly the principal of and interest on the Bonds.
1.04. The City has been advised by representatives of the Corporation that
conventional commercial financing is available to pay the capital costs of the
Development only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that
the scope of the Development and the economic feasibility of operating the
Development would be significantly affected, but with the aid of municipal
financing the Development can be constructed as designed and its operation can
be made more economically feasible.
1.05. The full faith and credit of the City will not be pledged to or
for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds.
Section 2. Approvals and Authorization.
2.01. It is hereby found and determined that it would be in the best interest
of the City to issue the Bonds under the provisions of the Act in an amount
currently estimated to be approximately $17,000,000 to finance all or a portion
of the cost of the Development.
2.02. The Project is hereby given preliminary approval by the City and the
issuance of the Bonds for such purpose approved. The Bonds shall not be issued
until a multifamily housing program prepared pursuant to the requirements of
Subdivision 5 of Section 462C of the Act (the "Program ") has been reviewed and
approved as provided by the Act, until the other requirements of the Act have
been satisfied, until the requirements of Section 103 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1954, as amended (the "Code "), necessary in order to assure the tax -
exempt of the interest hereon, have been satisfied, and until the City, the
Developer and the purchaser or purchasers of-the Bonds have agreed upon the
details of the Bonds and the provisions for their payment. The principal of,
12/17/84
premium, if any, and interest on each Bond, when, as and if issued, shall be
payable solely from the revenues of the Development and other security or
property pledged to the payment thereof and shall not constitute a debt of
the City.
2.03. The Corporation has agreed to pay directly or through the City any
and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the Development whether
or not the Program is.prepared or approved by the Minnesota Housing Finance
Agency; whether or not the Development is carried to completion; and whether
or not the Bonds are issued.
2.04. The City retains the right, in its sole discretion, to withdraw
from participation and, accordingly, not issue the Bonds should the City at any
time prior to the issuance thereof determine that it is in the best interest of
the City not to issue the Bonds. 1
2.05. This Resolution is intended to, and shall, constitute a "bond
resolution" or "some other official action" with respect to the Bonds and the
Development under, and within the meaning of, Section 1.103 -8(a) of the Treasury
Regulations under the Code.
Passed and adopted by the City Counc!il of the City of Edina, Minnesota
this 17th day of December, 1984.
Attest: I Mayor
City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member
Turner. l
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Resolution passed and adopted. j
REPORT GIVEN ON PROPOSAL FOR METROVAL /SPEED SKATING TRACK. Mr. Rosland reported
that the consultants to the Open Space Commission of the Metropolitan Council
have given their report regarding the three proposals submitted by Edina, Rose-
ville and Burnsville for construction ofja speed skating tract in their respective
communities. The consultants' report, based on an aggregate point system, showed
.the-Roseville site as number one, the Edina site as number two, and the Burnsville
site as number three. A hearing process will now be followed by the Open Space
Commission and the Metropolitan Council. No action taken.
CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Schmidt was seconded by Member Turner for payment
of the following claims as per Pre -List dated 12/17/84: General Fund $195,695.29,
Park Fund $49,033.19, Art Center $5,398.81, Swimming Pool Fund $1,427.72, Golf
Course Fund $3,965.95, Recreation Center Fund $17,083.36, Gun Range Fund $339.41,
Waterwork Fund $900,399.34, Sewer Rental Fund $162,349.21, Liquor Dispensary Fund
$542,511.72, Construction Fund $44,695.781, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $2,845,911.98,
Total $4,768,811.76, and for confirmationjof the following claims dated 11/30/84:
General Fund $91,128.84; Park Fund $155.10., Art Center.$181.99, Golf Course Fund
$55,670.64, Recreation Center Fund $1,637'.27, Gun Range Fund $153.99, Waterwork
Fund $576.08, Liquor Dispensary Fund $422,178.51, Total $571,682.42.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
I
There being no further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting
adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
City Clerk
MINUTES
SPECIAL YEAR -END MEETING
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 28, 1984
Mayor Courtney called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. Answering rollcall were
Members Richards, Schmidt, Turner and Mayor Courtney. Member Bredesen arrieced
at 5:10 p.m.
PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING CONTRACT FOR 1985 APPROVED. Mr. Rosland recalled that at
the Council Meeting of December 17, 1984, the Council had reviewed the agreement
for public health nursing services which the Bloomington Division of Public Health
had agreed to provide to Edina residents at a cost of $78,560.00 for 1985. This
amount is $740.00 less than the 1984 contract due to the $5,000 reduction in
funding. Because the Bloomington Division of Public Health had not identified
the service areas which will be reduced to offset the reduced funding, the Council
had directed the staff to contact Bloomington and to bring back that information
to the Council. Mr. Rosland stated that Bloomington has been contacted and they
have indicated that there will be no specific elimination of any category of service
which they are presently providing and that they will always specifically treat
remedial cases referred to them by the various hospitals. Services presently
provided by the Bloomington Division of Public Health are: Home Health Services,
Community Nursing Services, Disease Prevention and Control Services, Health
Education (partially funded by United Way) and Maternal and Child Health Service.
The dollar cutback in the Edina contract has resulted in Bloomington reducing its
marketing efforts of its health prevention programs. This reduction in marking
efforts has resulted in a reduction in demand for those services and thus Blooming-
ton has been able to keep the Edina component of the contract in line with the
monies provided. Bloomington has advised that with the further reduced contract
in 1985, there will be a continued lack of promotion of prevention efforts in
order to have sufficient money to take care of the remedial, part -pay and no -pay
patients. Barbara Reynolds, chairman of the Edina Advisory'Board of Health was
present and spoke in support of the recommendation that the public health nursing
contract for 1985 with the Bloomington Division of Public Health be approved.
Following discussion, Member Turner moved approval of the 1985 Public Health
Nursing Contract to the Bloomington Division of Public Health at $78,560.00.
Motion was seconded by Member Schmidt.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
VARIOUS MEETING DATES NOTED BY CITY MANAGER. Mr. Rosland informed the Council
Members of the following meeting dates:
1) Meeting.with Commissioner Randy Johnson and Commissioner -elect John Keefe
regarding Hennepin County's 1985 Legislative Program - January 2 or January 7;
2) Municipal Legislative Commission Board of Directors Meeting and Legislative
Delegation Reception - January 24;
3) LMC Legislative Conference - January 29.
4) Wooddale School Site Informational Meetings - January 8 and January 15.
He also indicated that the Wooddale Site issue would probably be on the Council
Agenda on February 4, and that the Second Reading of the rezoning for Edinborough
and preliminary plan approval, the draft Wine Licensing Ordinance and the LMC
Legislative Policies will probably be on the Council Agenda on January 21.
No action was taken.
STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES AND RECOMMENDED TRANSFERS APPROVED. As
recommended by Mr. Dalen, Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Schmidt
for approval of "Statement of Estimated Expensitures and Recommended Transfers
for Year Ended December 31, 1984 ".
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Coutney
Motion carried.
CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Bredesen for payment
of the following claims as per Pre -List dated 12/28/84: General Fund $108,279.68,
Park Fund $27,863.78, Art Center $2,529.91, Swimming Pool Fund $378.14, Golf
Course Fund $3,426.70, Recreation Center Fund $1,518.69, Gun Range Fund $46.98,
Waterworks Fund $12,833.37, Sewer Rental Fund $3,782.89, Liquor Dispensary Fund
$34,116.59, Construction Fund $3.75.00, Total $195,151.73.
There being further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting
adjourned at 5:25 p.m.
t
City Clerk
S A�
LOCATION MAP E61
REZONING &
SUBDIVISION
NUMBER Z -84 -3 and S -84 -14 Opus /Normandale Colf Course
Camelot West
L O C A T 10 N Generally (coated north of West 77th Street and East of T.H. 100
REQUEST R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to POD -2 Planned Office District
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Z -84 -3 Opus Corportion /Normandale Golf Course
5 -84 -14 Camelot West. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit
^r $� District to POD -2, Planned Office District
Mr. Gordon Hughes reminded the Commission that this
item had been continued from the November 28, 1984, meeting
in order for the Commissioners to view a golf course plan
prepared for the City. He presented the plan and
illustrated the location of the proposed office building.
He noted that this plan had been approved by the Park and
Recreation Department; Kenneth Rosland, City Manager and
John Vallerie, Manager of Braemar Golf Course.
Mr. Bob Worthington, Opus Corporation, was present to
answer any questions.
Mr. Dave Cooper, 4521 Sedum Lane, presented a petition
signed by 130 of the neighbors opposing the rezoning. He
stated that it was contrary to the South Edina Plan and the
Comprehensive Plan.,
Mr. Bill Sexton, 4901 Poppy Lane, presented pictures
taken from Fred Allen's property, 7453 West Shore Drive, of
the golf course to emphasize the impact a five - story
building would have on the neighbors. He said that he had
spoken with Warren Hyde, former City Manager and George
Hite, former Planning Director. They believed that the
subject land would always remain golf course. He presented
a letter from Mr. Hite stating so.
Mr. Helge Thomsen, 4705 Hibiscus Ave. S., stated that
he had attended those meetings when the area south of Lake
Edina Addition was being developed. At that time Pentagon
Park called for five stories which was two stories above the
then existing code. Due to much controversy, a compromise
was established between the neighbors and Mr. Rauenhorst.
The neighbors were guaranteed that the golf course would
remain permanently as a buffer and the five -story Pentagon
Park building was agreed upon.
Mr. David Byron, 7433 West Shore Dr., presented 30
additional signatures to the petition opposing the rezoning.
Mr. Byron commented that the November 28th Staff Report was
pro - developer and that parcel of land proposed for rezoning
was described as the southerly 6.5 acres. This description
was misleading. He further commented that Staff stated they
found no documentation of the agreement with the City to
permanently retain the golf course with the City. He
believed documentation existed.
Mr. Byron told the Commission that Mr. Rauenhorst was
unable to develop the industrial park until the City adopted
an industrial ordinance. The permanently guaranteed golf
course buffer was used to sell this project to the City and
the active neighborhood committees who were involved at that
time. Mr. Byron based his opinion on documentation and
research of.records on file in the Planning Department
files.
He stated that the Edina Zoning ordinance lists 13
specific objectives, not one of which would be met if this
rezoning proposal wes to be granted. At least half of them
would be met if the rezoning was denied. These are the
guidelines which should be followed.
Mr. Fred Allen, 7453 W. Shore Drive, believed that the
golf course plans presented were misleading because they
were out of scale. He pointed out that trees would have to
be cut down for this development and a five -story building
would be totally out of proportion. The proposed location
of the parking lot is illogical and undesirable.
Roger Peterson, 7505/07 W. Shore Drive, purchased his
property in 1970. He inquired of the status of the golf
course before purchasing his property and was told it would
remain open space.
Z -84 -3 Opus /Normandale Golf Inc. and
S -84 -14 Camelot West. R -1, Single Dwelling Unit
District to POD- 2,.Planned Office District
Generally located: North of West 77th Street and East of
T A4 T.H. 100
1 Mr. Gordon Hughes reported that the subject property
measures 27.5 acres in area and is zoned R -1, Single
Dwelling Unit District. The property is the present site of
Normandale Golf Course which is a nine hole, par 27
executive course. The golf course is served by an existing
A -frame pro shop /ticket office and a parking lot which is
accessed from West 77th Street.
The subject property is designated "quasi- public" by the
Edina Comprehensive Plan. Adjoining the rezoned parcel to
the west and east are developed properties which are zoned
POD -1. Across the street to the south are properties zoned
PID and POD -2. Adjoining the northerly edge of the golf
course are developed R -1 lots and adjoining the east
boundary of the golf course is Lake Edina Park.
The applicants request a rezoning of the southerly 6.75
acres of the property to POD -2, Planned Office District. A
preliminary development plan has been submitted which shows
a five -story 106,600 square foot office building for the
rezoned parcel. All parking will be located between the
proposed building and West 77:th Street. The proposed
building location maintains a distance of about 290 feet, at
the closest point, from the rear lot lines of the single
family lots which border the north edge of the golf course.
Mr. Hughes stated that according to City records, the
office /industrial land in the vicinity of the subject
property was rezoned in 1962. The City Council minutes
documenting this rezoning note concern expressed by some
residents and Council members regarding future development
of the golf course. Although the minutes indicate a
discussion concerning deed restrictions or protective
covenants to prohibit future development of the golf course,
no such restrictions were then imposed and, to the City's
knowledge, no restrictions now exist which affect the
development of the golf course other than normal zoning and
development controls.
Although they are unsure if the balance of the site will
continue to be operated as a golf course, the applicants are
willing to impose a deed restriction or similar covenant
insuring that no further development occurs.
Mr.Hughes noted that the City of Edina may be interested in
acquiring the balance of the property and operating the golf
course.
Mr. Hughes said that from a land use standpoint, the
proposed development of the southerly portion of the site
for office purposes and the retention of the balance of the
site as a golf course /open space /buffer represents a
reasonable use of the property which is in keeping with
surrounding developments.
However, the proposed five -story building is somewhat taller
than surrounding developments and therefore, a rezoning to
POD -1 which has a four- story height limit may be more
appropriate for the subject property.
The building should be relocated southerly to provide a more
generous spacing from the homes to the north. The desire to
take advantage of the views afforded by the golf course is
understandable. Staff believes that the amenity value of
the course could still be realized if the building were
moved 100 feet southerly.
With these comments, Mr. Hughes suggested that preliminary
approval should be granted subject to:
1. Platting of the property.
2. Conservation Restriction covering the area not
rezoned.
3. Acceptable final development plans.
He introduced Mr. Bob Worthington, Executive Director of
Government Affairs for Opus Corporation. Mr. Worthington
presented air photos and explained that construction would
not begin for perhaps two years until the need for office
space increases.
Mr. Worthington said that a portion of the building would be
used for a clubhouse for the golf course and that there
would be an easement on the balance of the property to
insure the open space remains. Mr. Worthington and
Mr.Hughes mentioned that the City had expressed an interest
in the golf course although funds for such an expense were
not available at this time. A donation to the City of this
portion of the property is a possibility also.
Mr. Lewis asked Mr. Worthington to comment on the
recommendation of a zone change to POD -1 instead of POD -2.
Mr. Worthington stated that Opus Corporation was most
interested in constructing a five -story office building. He
added that it could be changed if the Planning Commission
felt it was necessary.
Mr. Del Johnson stated that he agreed that the office
building would be located too far to the north on the site.
Mr. Worthington reported that the purpose of the northerly
location was for energy efficiency. The angle of the
building would make better use of the sun rays. The
building would be better located to the north for
participation in the golf course as a clubhouse. Mr.
Worthington believes that the residents to the north do not
received such a full view of the building because it would
be angled and this would be more beneficial to them. Opus
feels that the building situated to the north creates the
best parking lot conditions. Although Opus prefers the
northerly location, they would agree to Staff
recommendations.
Mr. Gordon Johnson asked if the parking was adequate for
both office and golf use. Mr. Worthington stated that the
parking was sufficient. Staff was statisfied with the
parking.
Mr. Runyan wondered how much land would be acquired by
moving the building away from the residential homes. Mr.
Worthington explained that an additional 50 to 75 feet would
separate the building from the nearest residential home.
Heavy berming would shield the parking from the neighbors.
Mrs. McClelland was more in favor of removing a story from
the building rather than moving the building.
Mr. Fred Allen, 7453 West Shore Drive, stated that office
space was not needed in this area and that a five- story
building was completely out of proportion. The northerly
location of the building would significantly shorten the
length of the golf course, and would hinder the wildlife
that has been established there. Mr. Allen stated that the
golf course simply needed to be maintained better in order
to beneficial. He argued that the neighbors had been
promised that the golf course would be a permanent buffer
between the office area and the residential area.
David Byron, 7433 West Shore Drive, pointed out that his
property abutted the golf course. Mr. Byron stated that
more neighbors would have attended the meeting if they had
been aware of it. He accussed Opus of using a five- story
building as "leverage" and that the neighbors were not only
opposed to a five- story building, but to any construction
of an office building.
Mr. Bryon stated his opposition tof the proposal for the
following reasons:
11. This property was established as a buffer zone in 1962.
It should remain as is.
2. It is strictly a convenience that Mr. Rauenhorst does
not recall making a committment to the neighbors to preserve
this buffer zone permanently.
3. The proposed useis not compatible with Edina's
Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan suggests
Public /Quasi Public Use.
4. Five stories is completely out of proportion for the
neighborhood.
5. The building is located too far to the north. Security
lights from the building will shine directly into the
neighbors' yards and homes.
6. A restaurant plan was presented at the neighborhood
meeting. Is this still in the picture?
7. No visual screening for the neighbors has been
presented.
8. The neighbors would need a committment that if this
proposal is granted, the remainder of the property would be
a permanent buffer.
Lee Seeber, 7437 West Shore Drive, pointed out that Mr.
Worthington had stated that the golf course need has
declined because of competition and therefore, the need for
a office building was more financially desirable and then
contradicted himself by saying at a later point that there
was a demand for golf courses in the area. Mr. Seeber
stated that he had spoken with the Park Board in hopes that
Edina could take over Normandale Golf Course and bring it up
to Braemar's standards. He was informed that at this time
there were no funds. He suggested that Opus donate the land
to Edina and was told that this was a possibility. Later he
was informed of a neighborhood meeting at which the present
proposal was discussed. He stated that the neighbors were
unprepared and did not object at that time, however, now
many neighbors opposed.
David Sarver, 7421 West Shore Drive, stated that the
wildlife would diminish and many trees would need to be
eliminated. The trees are presently screening the view of
other office buildings. He was opposed.
Bill Sexton, 4901 Poppy Lane, stated that the prime reason
for the lack of interested golfers is because of the poor
maintenance of the property. An office building there would
be a poor choice. Mr. Sexton asked how the neighbors could
be informed of the public meetings. Mr. Hughes explained
the procedure for rezoning.
Joan Sexton, 4901 Poppy Lane, noted that the golf course was
once a ski shop in the winter months and did well until the
Rauenhorst children acquired it.
Mr. Seeber suggested that the parking lot be relocated in
order to move the office building to the south. Mr.
Worthington explained that Opus was interested in including
the building with the golf course.
Mr. Worthington stated that Opus had previously held the
proposal over from the Planning Commission meeting in order
to give the neighbors ample time to comment to Opus
Corporation or ask questions and they had received no
response.
He stated that Opus intended to legally bind itself with an
easement stating that the remainder of the property would be
permanent buffer.
Mr. Gordon Johnson suggested that this proposal be held over
to the next meeting in order to landscaping and golf
course plans. Mrs. McClelland seconded the motion. All
were in favor; the motion carried.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
NOVEMBER 28, 1984
Z -84 -3 Opus /Normandale Golf Inc. and
5 -84 -14 Camelot West. R -1, Single Dwelling Unit
District to POD -2, Planned Office District
Refer to: Attached preliminary development plan and
preliminary plat
Generally located: North of West 77th Street and East of
T.H. 100
The subject property measures 27.5 acres in area and is
zoned R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. The property is
present site of Normandale Golf Course which is a nine
_e, par 27 executive course. The golf course is served by
an existing A -frame pro shop /ticket office and a parking lot
which is accessed from West 77th Street.
The subject property is designated "quasi- public" by the
Edina Comprehensive Plan. Adjoining the rezoned parcel to
the west and east are developed properties which are zoned
POD -1. Across the street to the south are properties zoned
PID and pOD -2. Adjoining the northerly edge of the golf
course are developed R -1 lots and adjoining the east
boundary of the golf course is Lake Edina Park.
The applicants request a rezoning of the southerly 6.75
acres of the property to POD -2, Planned Office District. A
preliminary development plan has been submitted which shows
a five -story 106,600 square foot office building for the
rezoned parcel. This building is proposed to be located on
the northerly extreme of the rezoned parcel presumably to
take advantage of the views afforded by the remainder of the
golf course. All parking will be located between the
proposed building and West 77th Street. The proposed
building location maintains a distance of about 290 feet, at
the closest point, from the rear lot lines of the single
family lots which border the north edge of,the golf course.
cording to our records, the office /industrial land in the
..,cinity of the subject property was rezoned in 1962. The
City Council minutes documenting this rezoning note concern
expressed by some residents and Council members regarding
future development of the golf course. Although the minutes
indicate a discussion concerning deed restrictions or
protective covenants to prohibit future development of the
golf course, no such restrictions were then imposed and, to
our knowledge, no restrictions now exist which affect the
development of the golf course other than normal zoning and
development controls.
The applicants have stated that the office building now
proposed represents full development of the entire 27.5 acre
golf course site. Although they are unsure if the balance
of the site will continue to be operated as a golf course,
the applicants are willing to impose a deed restriction or
similar covenant insuring that no further development
occurs.
If the golf course use continues, it is obvious that a
reconfiguration of some of the holes is necessary. The
attached plan prepared by Don Herfort, golf course
architect, shows a possible reconfiguration if the proposed
office building is constructed. It should be noted that Mr.
Herfort was retained by the City of Edina which may be
interested in acquiring the balance of the property and
operating the golf course.
The City has also requested Barr Engineering Co., our
hydrologic consultants, to verify that the stormwater
ponding needs of the area can be met if the proposed
development occurs. Barr Engineering reports that the
proposed development is feasible, from a stormwater
management standpoint, provided that a relatively minor
storm sewer extension is constructed.
Recommendation
From a land use standpoint, we believe that the proposed
development of the southerly portion of the site for office
purposes and the retention of the balance of the site as a
golf course /open space /buffer represents a reasonable use of
the property which is in keeping with surrounding
developments. We are certain that some may testify that the
developer promised in 1962 that the golf course would always
remain undeveloped and, thus, the proposed rezoning should
not be allowed. As noted earlier, Staff can't document that
such a committment was made, either explicitally or
implicitally, to the City.
Some specific elements of the proposed plan deserve review.
First, the proposed five -story building is somewhat taller
than surrounding developments. The office building to the
west is one story in height and the offices to the east are
three stories. The Pentagon Office Building which is
located south of West 77th Street and west of Computer
Avenue is six stories, but maintains a greater separation
from residential uses. Therefore, a rezoning to POD -1 which
has a four story height limit may be more appropriate for
the subject.property.
As noted earlier, the proposed office building is located on
the northerly portion of the rezoned parcel to take
advantage of the golf course. Obviously, the building could
be relocated southerly to provide a more generous spacing
from the homes to the north. The desire to take advantage
of the views afforded by the golf course is understandable.
We believe that the amenity value of the course could still
be realized if the building were moved 100 feet southerly.
With these comments, we suggest that preliminary approval
should be granted subject to:
1. Platting of the property.
2. Conservation Restriction covering the area not
rezoned.
3. Acceptable final development plans.
u y
f '-,3
f
PROJECT DATA
BUILDING AREA u..1e1.1
Ir1 R000 10,000 r� M1
IN 110011 IO.OeO M1
Oro 11000 11,000 D. M1
O1O IL0O0 11.00011. M1
O11 ROOK IIv00O rO. M1
Tom IOO.O00 N M1
1 / 111111KI 11.000 N IL
(11011001 ITOYY ORn
AUTOMOBILE PARKING
001111 111
Y11O1YT Ir
To— 111
SOUTHWEST ELEVATION
zT I
R
a>
mo
oT
a�o �
5
IL
0
r
s
i
W
F
Y$ s
3
= F
1
a
s
fY N
u
December 28, 1984
Mr. William Sexton
4901 Poppy Lane
Edina, MN 55435
Bill,
My recollection of the Pentagon Park zoning and development
plan approval includes a quid pro quo between the golf course
set aside and the allowed office development pattern and
density.
The early 1960s was a period of difficult adjustment for
Edina planners, officials and residents. Large scale office
and industrial park proposals for the southern Edina areas
east and west of T.H. 100 were viewed as essential to the
establishment of a more diversified property tax base yet
potentially detrimental to the residential areas to their
north. A good deal of attention was paid to assuring vehi-
cular separation between these residential and non - residential
areas and to establishing the greatest degree of spatial
.separation possible.
The Normandale Golf Course became an integral part of the
Pentagon Park plan as a means of achieving the spatial
separation objective. My recollection is that among the
incentives established for the office park developer in
exchange for the golf course set aside, was the opportunity
to utilize the land area represented by the golf course in
establishing the allowable building floor area in the area
zoned for office use. In the jargon of the city planners,
this means that the FAR (floor area ratio) calculation in-
cluded-the golf course acreage.
Sincerely
L 1*
....�
George Hite
GH:cr
December 11, 1984
TO: Honorable C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor
Edina City Council
Edina Community Development & Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Normandale (Camelot) Golf Course
The undersigned neighbors of Normandale Golf Course are
totally opposed to rezoning any part of Normandale Golf Course
from its current zoning classification of Single Dwelling Unit
District (R -1). This property has been zoned R -1 for many years
as a buffer between the high quality residential neighborhood to
the north and the Opus /Rauenhorst Normandale Center development
of the 1960's to the south. Rezoning would be contrary to the
first stated objective of Edina's Zoning Ordinance, to wit: "To
maintain, protect and enhance single family detached dwelling
neighborhoods as the dominant land use." Rezoning would also be
contrary to Edina's 1980 Comprehensive Plan, and, its forerunner,
the South Edina Plan. We urge a prompt denial of the pending
Opus /Rauenhorst Petition For Zone Change.
VV-A— +-1- -� V-�a Y Q•--r• 4- -1 1 1 i- 6 t� u, t,s � t J
-1-`51
December 11, 1984
TO: Honorable C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor
Edina City Council
Edina Community Development & Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Normandale (Camelot) Golf Course
The undersigned neighbors of Normandale Golf-Course are
totally opposed to rezoning any part of Normandale Golf Course
from its current zoning classification of Single Dwelling Unit
District (R -1). This property has been zoned R -1 for many years
as a buffer between the high quality residential neighborhood to
the.north and the Opus /Rauenhorst Normandale Center development
of the 1960's to the south. Rezoning would be contrary to the
first stated objective of Edina's Zoning Ordinance, to wit: "To
maintain, protect . and enhance single family detached dwelling
neighborhoods as the dominant land use." Rezoning would also be
contrary to Edina's 1980 Comprehensive Plan, and, its forerunner,
the South Edina Plan. We urge a prompt denial of the pending
Opus /Rauenhorst Petition For Zone Change.
1.
December 11, 1984
TO: Honorable C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor
Edina City Council
Edina Community Development & Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Normandale (Camelot) Golf Course
The undersigned neighbors of Normandale Golf Course are
totally opposed to rezoning any part of Normandale Golf Course
from its current zoning classification of Single Dwelling Unit
District (R -1). This property has been zoned R -1 for many years
as a buffer between the high quality residential neighborhood to
the north and the Opus /Rauenhorst Normandale Center development
of the 1960's to the south. Rezoning would be contrary to the
first stated objective of Edina's Zoning Ordinance, to wit: "To
maintain, protect and enhance single family detached dwelling
neighborhoods as the dominant land use." Rezoning would also be
contrary to Edina's 1980 Comprehensive Plan, and, its forerunner,
the South Edina Plan. We urge a prompt denial of the pending
Opus /Rauenhorst Petition For Zone Change.
Name Address
rz) 71� Z/- 7S- 6?
MAN
15--o
`7 q -1
>( �� it P4c o. Lon
3•
December 11, 1984
TO: Honorable C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor
Edina City Council
Edina Community Development & Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Normandale (Camelot) Golf Course
The undersigned neighbors of Normandale Golf- Course are
totally opposed to rezoning any part of Normandale Golf Course
from its current zoning classification of Single Dwelling Unit
District (R -1). This property has been zoned R -1 for many years
as a buffer between the high quality residential neighborhood to
the north and the Opus /Rauenhorst Normandale Center development
of the 1960's to the south. Rezoning would be contrary to the
first stated objective of Edina's Zoning Ordinance, to wit: "To
maintain, protect and enhance single family detached dwelling
neighborhoods as the dominant land use." Rezoning would also be
contrary to Edina's 1980 Comprehensive Plan, and, its forerunner,
the South Edina Plan. We urge a prompt denial of the pending
Opus /Rauenhorst Petition For Zone Change.
�JJr Name Address
1_�-
December 11, 1984
TO: Honorable C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor
Edina City Council
Edina Community Development & Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Normandale (Camelot) Golf Course
The undersigned neighbors of Normandale Golf Course are
totally opposed to rezoning any part of Normandale Golf Course
from its current zoning classification of Single Dwelling Unit
District (R -1). This property has been zoned R -1 for many years
as a buffer between the high quality residential neighborhood to
the north and the Opus /Rauenhorst Normandale Center development
of the 1960's to the south. Rezoning would be contrary to the
first stated objective of Edina's Zoning Ordinance, to wit: "To
maintain, protect and enhance single family detached dwelling
neighborhoods as the dominant land use." Rezoning would also be
contrary to Edina's 1980 Comprehensive Plan, and, its forerunner,
the South Edina Plan. We urge a prompt denial of the pending
Opus /Rauenhorst Petition For Zone Change.
9.
December 11, 1984
TO: Honorable C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor
Edina City Council
Edina Community Development & Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Normandale (Camelot) Golf Course
The undersigned neighbors of Normandale Golf Course are
totally opposed to rezoning any part of Normandale Golf Course
from its current zoning classification of Single Dwelling Unit
District (R -1). This property has been zoned R -1 for many years
as a buffer between the high quality residential neighborhood to
the north and the Opus /Rauenhorst Normandale Center development
of the 1960's to the south. Rezoning would be contrary to the
first stated objective of Edina's Zoning Ordinance, to wit: "To
maintain, protect and enhance single family detached dwelling
neighborhoods as the dominant land use." Rezoning would also be
contrary to Edina's 1980 Comprehensive Plan, and, its forerunner,
the South Edina Plan. We urge a prompt denial of the pending
Opus /Rauenhorst Petition For Zone Change.
�� G
L;
rol
December 11, 1984
TO: Honorable C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor
Edina City Council
Edina Community Development & Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Normandale (Camelot) Golf Course
The undersigned neighbors of Normandale Golf-Course are
totally opposed to rezoning any part of Normandale Golf Course
from its current zoning classification of Single Dwelling Unit
District (R -1). This property has been zoned R -1 for many years
as a buffer between the high quality residential neighborhood to
the north and the Opus /Rauenhorst Normandale Center development
of the 1960's to the south. Rezoning would be contrary to the
first stated objective of Edina's Zoning Ordinance, to wit: "To
maintain, protect and enhance single family detached dwelling
neighborhoods as the dominant land use." Rezoning would also be
contrary to Edina's 1980 Comprehensive Plan, and, its forerunner,
the South Edina Plan. We urge a prompt denial of the pending
Opus /Rauenhorst Petition For Zone Change.
Name Address
!.
December 11, 1984
TO: Honorable C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor
Edina City Council
Edina Community Development & Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Normandale (Camelot) Golf Course
The undersigned neighbors of Normandale Golf Course are
totally opposed to rezoning any part of Normandale Golf Course
from its current zoning classification of Single Dwelling Unit
District (R -1). This property has been zoned R -1 for many years
as a buffer between the high quality residential neighborhood to
the north and the Opus /Rauenhorst Normandale Center development
of the 1960's to the south. Rezoning would be contrary to the
first stated objective of Edina's Zoning Ordinance, to wit: "To
maintain, protect and enhance single family detached dwelling
neighborhoods as the dominant land use." Rezoning would also be
contrary to Edina's 1980 Comprehensive Plan, and, its forerunner,
the South Edi -na Plan. We urge a prompt denial of the pending
Opus /Rauenhorst Petition For Zone Change.
Name Address
i* WLur llggq
I MAD
"/
�ii� 0 ORW
i
• ( 1'V) , r-,-Y _ � A;-J t'-- — _ 4 n , .. LL 1 0
44, Y 173
:233 /
Ai
7
TO: Honorable C. Wayne Courtney,
Edina City Council
Edina Community Development
December 11, 1984
Mayor
& Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Normandale (Camelot) Golf Course
The undersigned neighbors of Normandale Golf- Course are
totally opposed to rezoning any part of Normandale Golf Course
from its current zoning classification of Single Dwelling Unit
District (R -1). This property has been zoned R -1 for many years
as a buffer between the high quality residential neighborhood to
the north and the Opus /Rauenhorst Normandale Center development
of the 1960's to the south. Rezoning would be contrary to the
first stated objective of Edina's Zoning Ordinance, to wit: "To
maintain, protect and enhance single family detached dwelling
neighborhoods as the dominant land use." Rezoning would also be
contrary to Edina's 1980 Comprehensive Plan, and, its forerunner,
the'South Edina Plan. We urge a prompt denial of the pending
Opus /Rauenhorst Petition For Zone Change.
Name Address
2f Ot t EL�� L
I,
December 11, 1984
TO: Honorable C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor
Edina City Council
Edina Community Development & Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Normandale (Camelot) Golf Course
The undersigned neighbors of Normandale Golf-Course are
totally opposed to rezoning any part of Normandale Golf Course
from its current zoning classification of Single Dwelling Unit
District (R -1). This property has been zoned R -1 for many years
as a buffer between the high quality residential neighborhood to
the north and the Opus /Rauenhorst Normandale Center development
of the 1960's to the south. Rezoning would be contrary to the
first stated objective of Edina's Zoning Ordinance, to wit: "To
maintain, protect and enhance single family detached dwelling
neighborhoods as the dominant land use." Rezoning would also be
contrary to Edina's 1980 Comprehensive Plan, and, its forerunner,
the South Edina Plan. We urge a prompt denial of the pending
Opus /Rauenhorst Petition For Zone Change.
Name Address
/V
Se__,P�.-
December 11, 1984
TO: Honorable C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor
Edina City Council
Edina Community Development & Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Normandale (Camelot) Golf Course
The undersigned neighbors of Normandale Golf- Course are
totally opposed to rezoning any part of Normandale Golf Course
from its current zoning classification of Single Dwelling Unit
District (R -1). This property has been zoned R -1 for many years
as a buffer between the high quality residential neighborhood to
the north and the Opus /Rauenhorst Normandale Center development
of the 1960's to the south. Rezoning would be contrary to the
first stated objective of Edina's Zoning Ordinance, to wit: "To
maintain, protect and enhance single family detached dwelling
neighborhoods as the dominant land use." Rezoning would also be
contrary to Edina's 1980 Comprehensive Plan, and, its forerunner,
the South Edina Plan. We urge a prompt denial of the pending
Opus /Rauenhorst Petition For Zone Change.
Name n/7 Address
December 11, 1984
TO: Honorable C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor
Edina City Council
Edina Community Development & Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Normandale (Camelot) Golf Course
The undersigned neighbors of Normandale Golf - Course are
totally opposed to rezoning any part of Normandale Golf Course
from its current zoning classification of Single Dwelling Unit
District (R -1). This property has been zoned R -1 for many years
as a buffer between the high quality residential neighborhood to
the north and the Opus /Rauenhorst Normandale Center development
of the 1960's to the south. Rezoning would be contrary to the
first stated objective of Edina's Zoning Ordinance, to wit: "To
maintain, protect and enhance single family detached dwelling
neighborhoods as the dominant land use." Rezoning would also be
contrary to Edina's 1980 Comprehensive Plan, and, its forerunner,
the South Edina Plan. We urge a prompt denial of the pending
Opus /Rauenhorst Petition For Zone Change.
J ,qUe. L' A -ss.�v �S�Od ('Logo 1J2��
2rZA-PX4E
A 'Vol
/3e
r
December 11, 1984
TO: Honorable C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor
Edina City Council
Edina Community Development & Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Normandale (Camelot) Golf Course
The undersigned neighbors of Normandale Golf Course are
totally opposed to rezoning any part of Normandale Golf Course
from its current zoning classification of Single Dwelling Unit
District (R -1). This property has been zoned R -1 for many years
as a buffer between the high quality residential neighborhood to
the north and the Opus /Rauenhorst Normandale Center development
of the 1960's to the south. Rezoning would be contrary to the
first stated objective of Edina's Zoning Ordinance, to wit: "To
maintain, protect and enhance single family detached dwelling
neighborhoods as the dominant land use." Rezoning would also be
contrary to Edina's 1980 Comprehensive Plan, and, its forerunner,
the South Edina Plan. We urge a prompt denial of the pending
Opus /Rauenhorst Petition For Zone Change.
Name
Address
es)
f 1I
rscvs •�vE .
h
M r.
:I t FtA ,
W 49 T H ITT
HILLTOP ,
> f
O
51 ST > CIT
O W HALL 5 Pull:
(A ® o POLICELH3
X ac , a� DEPT.
< Y o F o r,
J Y
= o EDINA
PUBLIC
m WORKS
CENTER
W 52ND ST
o
- EDINA
�l 1 y�^v
RD
0
3 OUR LADY
W OF GRACE;
= CATHOLIC SCHOOL
DENNOOR ST '•�� .'Kt
ICH Op
ro? a
N
RICHWC ID R1CHH v �,
W1N0504 Av L4 < k
I 1 ��L•• t',Fw O i
NUMBER P -84 -3 Final Development Plan
L O C A T 10 N 5203 Vernon Avenue
REQUEST
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
III. NEW BUSINESS;
Q� P -84 -3 Final Development
Edina Family Care Clinic,
Generally located east of
Link Road
Mr. Craig Larsen stated that
zoned Planned Commercial District
used as a medical office for thre
Plan
5203 Vernon Avenue
Vernon Avenue and North of
the subject property is
2 (PCD -2) and is being
a physicians.
The owner's are requesting approval of a plan to
construct an addition of approximately 1,100 square feet to
the building. The addition includes a full basement
zesulting in an addition of 2,200 square feet in floor area
to the building. The main floor would be used primarily as
office space with the basement area used for storage.
Mr. Larsen reported the Zoning Ordinance now requires
that medical clinics provide one space for each 200 square
feet of gross floor area plus one space for each physician.
This results in a requirement of twenty -two spaces for the
existing use and eleven spaces for the proposed addition.
The owners are proposing to lease seven spaces on adjacent
property for a total of twenty -eight spaces, resulting in a
need for a five parking space variance. The Zoning
Ordinance allows the Commission and Council to consider
variances as part of the Planned District review process.
Mr. Larsen recommended approval of the proposed
addition and also recommended granting a variance from the
parking space requirement. The leased parking should be
utilized by clinic staff since,it does not relate directly
to existing parking on the site. A concern, however, is if
additional physicians are added to the practice a parking
problem would result. Mr. Larsen noted that support of the
proposed variance is based upon the particular space needs
of the existing clinic with its three physicians.
Mr. Jack Barren, representative of Edina Family Care
Clinic, assured the Commission that the expansion was for
office space only and no additional physicians were
anticipated. He presented a memorandum listing the use of
the additional facility.
Mr. Palmer moved for approval and Mr. Sked seconded the
motion. All were in favor; the final development plans
were approved.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
JANUARY 2, 1985
P -84 -3 Final Development Plan
Edina Family Care Clinic, 5203 Vernon Avenue
Generally located east of Vernon Avenue and North of Link
Road
Refer to: Attached Plans
The subject property is zoned Planned Commercial District 2
(PCD -2) and is being used as a medical office for three
physicians. The building was converted from a restaurant to
its present use in 1981.
The owner's are requesting approval of a plan to construct
an addition of.approximately 1,100 square feet to the
building. The addition includes a full basement resulting
in an addition of 2,200 square feet in floor area to the
building. The main floor would be used primarily as office
space with the basement area used for storage. The
proponent has stated that the addition is necessary to meet
current needs of the clinic, and that it is not for the
purpose of adding physicians to the practice.
The twenty -one parking spaces currently provided exceeded
the requirement of six spaces per physician under the
provisions of the old zoning ordinance. The Zoning
Ordinance now requires that medical clinics provide one
space for.each 200 square feet of gross floor area plus one
space for each physician. This results in a requirement of
twenty -two spaces for the existing use and eleven spaces for
the proposed addition. The owners are proposing to lease
seven spaces on adjacent property for a total of twenty -
eight spaces, resulting in a need for a five parking space
variance. The Zoning Ordinance allows the Commission and
Council to consider variances as part of the Planned
District review process.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the proposed addition and would
also recommend granting a variance"from the parking space
requirement. The leased parking spaces should handle
additional parking demand created by the proposed addition,
including additional support staff.
The leased parking should be utilized by clinic staff since
it does not relate directly to existing parking on the site.
Staff is concerned, however, if additional physicians are
added to the.practice a parking problem would result.
Staff's support of the proposed variance is based upon the
particular space needs of the existing clinic with its three
physicians.
Barron Construction, Inc.
"BUILDERS AND REAL ESTATE INVESTORS" 7400 METRO BLVD., SUITE 140
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 612.835 -1001
°.r, ,-,DICAL PTM111, SFiVIC ".D
by
EDINIc RkMILY C.-.P—E CLINIC
Medicpre
Blue Cross - Blue Shield?
Philsician's health Plan
Med Center Health Plan
Ist Hp l.th Plan
Yi nnesota Health Net,•Tork
7-.7elfare R: Social Secrrity
F=.. _ . 'C' . Yi nnes o +.a
Barron Construction,
"BUILDERS AND REAL ESTATE INVESTORS"
THE CLINIC F_4S LOST:
Inc.
7400 METRO BLVD., SUITE 140
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 612- 835 -1001
Dr. Beecher's office to Secretar: * /'4ec1ica2 ',n•ist
Dr. Rhode's office to the commuter
The lunchroom to the new fi li n,- r?mrs
3 secretarial stations to the filing ra*-ps
Dr. Kafft's office to the Nurse ?rsct.i tioner
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: 'Mayor and City Council
FROM: -Bob Kojetin, Park and Recreation Director
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: January 10, 1985
5-A
Material Description (General Specifications):
For services - for grading of land between Van Valkenburg Park and Grandview
Cementary border - final grading
Quotations /Bids:
Company
1, Veit and Co. Inc.
14000 Veit P1.
Rogers, MN
2. Buesing Bros. Trucking
Long Lake, MN
G.L. Contracting Inc.
Hopkins, MN
Department Recommendation:
Veit and Co.
Finance Director's Endorsement
The recommended bid is �/
Amount of Quote or Bid
$ 9,140.00
$ 9,400.00
$9,500.00
ti
'gn re Department
: _
is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
en, finance Director
City nager's Endorsement: '
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Gordon Hughes
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF IT EI IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: January 21, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
1985 Treatment for I ndianhead Lake
Quotations /Bids:
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
l , Clean -Flo Laboratories, Inc. $5,481.
2.
3.
Department Recommendation: Award to Clean -Flo 1,aboratoribs, Inc.
(No other suppliers) " /J �1_
'"- Planning
Sianatu a Department
Finance Director's Endorsement;;:
The recommended bid is is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
J. N. Dal en, Finance Director
City M aaer's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative: ��
l �
CLEAN -FLO LABORATORIES, INC.
wa
4342 SHADY OAK ROAD HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343
Gordon Hughes, City of Edina and December 17,1984
Indianhead Improvement, Inc.
c/o Mr. Robert Perkins, President
6909 Dakota Trail
Edina, MN 55435
Dear Property Owners and City Officials:
This is in response to my conversation Friday with Bob
Perkins, in which he indicated that the conconsensus of the
people on the lake and the consultants is that the program should
continue as it has in the past, and that the new equipment per
our recommendation should not be installed.
I have stated my opinion that the additional equipment could
save you the annual Lake Cleanser and dye fees, but either
program is fine with me, as we are seeing a continual improvement
in the lake anyway.
So our quotation for 1984 is as follows:
ITEM DUE NOW TOTAL AMT
Maintenance $ 421.00
4000 Lbs Lake Cleanser 1,253.33
Application of Lake Cleanser --
18 gal lake dye 300.00
Application of dye --
Insurance 100.00
Total $2,074.33
$ 421.00
3,760.00
300.00
900.00
100.00
100.00
$5,481.00
You should pay $2,074.33 now, and the balance of $3,406.67
will be billed to you as it is installed. Please send in your
permit application as soon as possible, so that we are not
delayed at a bad time, when it is time to apply the materials.
Thank you very much for placing your confidence in us. I am
sure as time goes by, that you will more and more appreciate the
wisdom of using our program.
Very ,ruly yours,
Robert L. Laing, President
RLL /bj
612/935 -2137 To bring a take back to life ... You must first bring life back to the lake. 8nn/328- 66,91
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
ROM: Bob Kojetin, Director of Park and Recreation
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITDI IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: January 18,. 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
Replace roof on swimming pool bath house
Quotations /Bids:
Company
1. Keho Construction
2. Falls and Nyhusmoen Const.
Department Recommendation:
Amount of Quote or Bid
$9,900.00
$16,779.00
Recommend award of roof replacement to Keho Const.
Finance Director's Endorsement
The recommended bid is ✓ is not
Department
within the amount budget for the purchase.
J. N. Da en, Finance Director
City ager's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of "^ " ^ —n--4--4. ________,
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
j
MINUTES
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
JANUARY 15. 1985
9:00 A.M.
Members present: Fran Hoffman, Chairman
Gordon Hughes
Alison Fuhr
Craig Swanson
Members absent: Lois Coon
Others present: Capt. Leonard Kleven,-Edina Police ;Department
Mr. Mark Bernhardson, Assistant City Manager
SECTION A
Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified,
and the Council's authorization of recommended action.
NONE.
SECTION B
Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request.
1. Request for "NO PARKING" signs along-West 56th Street in the area of
Wooddale Avenue (Colony Park Baptist Church).
Request made by Mr. John Clausen, area resident.
ACTION TAKEN:
The Committee reviewed the attached memorandum from Mr. Bernhardson
and discussed its contents with him. Colony Park Church and members
of the neighborhood met and discussed parking along West 56th Street
near Wooddale Avenue. Resolved at the meeting was the recommendation
that no further parking restrictions were needed while voluntary
solutions to any problem would be sought and implemented. Additionally,
the area's signing should be reviewed in six to nine months. Mr.
Clausen, the requestor, was not present at the above meeting.
Mr. Hughes moved denial of the request for additional parking restrictions.
Mr. Swanson seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0. .
2. Request for the installation of a four -way "STOP" at the intersection
of Tracy Avenue and Valley View Road.
Request made by Mr. R.A. Rud, 6223 Westridge Boulevard.
Traffic Safety Committee Minutes
Page 2
January 15, 1985
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Hoffman reported the results of a traffic count conducted on
Tracy Avenue at Valley View Road. Warrants would be met for a "STOP"
sign installation if 500 vehicles per hour entered the intersection
for an eight -hour period. Findings indicate that this warrant is met
for seven hours per day, but not the required eight hours.
A memorandum from Fire Chief William Feck stated that a "STOP" sign
on Tracy- Avenue may hinder fire vehicles from entering Tracy Avenue.
Also, stopped vehicles on Tracy Avenue may cause fire vehicles to use
oncoming traffic lanes to pass through the intersection.
Capt. Kleven reported three vehicular accidents At the intersection
since January 1, 1983. Additionally, he reported the greatest period
of traffic backup, etc. at times when Colonial Church has major events
scheduled. However, Colonial Church oftentimes hires off -duty Police
Department employees to manage these traffic problems.
Mrs. Fuhr described her view of the intersection and suggests its
geometrics (wide roadways) contributes to confusion of drivers.
Mr. Hoffman stated that the south ramp area was not counted, but
generally would mirror the numbers of the north ramp.
Mr. Swanson moved denial of the request based on lack of warrants.
Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0.
Mrs. Fuhr moved that further investigation be conducted of similar
ramps and the results be reported back to the Committee. Mr. Swanson
seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0.
SECTION C
Requests which are deferred to a later date or are referred to others.
1. Mr. Hoffman updated the Committee on the status of signalization of
West 78th Street at Cahill Road. The intersection does not currently
meet warrants for signalization, however, increased development in
the area may provide the basis for warrants in the near future. The
conditions providing warrants are currently being reviewed and new
criteria may be forthcoming. Hennepin County has the intersection
scheduled for signalization in 1986 or 1987. Mr. Hoffman will
continue his study of the area and maintain contact with the City of
Bloomington on the matter.
Mrs. Fuhr moved that Mr. Hoffman report changes to the Committee as
they become known. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0.
Respectfully submitted,
Edina Traffic Safety Committee
M E M-0 R A N D U M
TO: Traffic Safety Committee
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, Assistant City Manager"1,\
SUBJECT: 56TH STREET PARKING
DATE: January 14, 1985
As noted in the attached letter, a meeting was held with Colony Park
Baptist and the 56th Street residents on either side of Wooddale to
discuss the parking situation. Residents at the meeting included six
individuals from three households on 56th, one household abutting 56th
east of Wooddale and two households abutting 56th west of Wooddale,
together with the Pastor and Administrator from Colony Park Baptist.
During the discussion, it was indicated that Sunday parking with Colony
Park has not been a significant problem with the residents, particularly
in relationship to the situation when it was Colonial Church. At
present, in fact, only three or perhaps four persons are parking on 56th,
and generally those are handicapped individuals for whom parking there
gives better access to ramps into the Church. As for the identified
concern on Monday evenings, there doesn't seem to be a significant problem
for the residents or the City during good weather; however, in the winter
time, it can become a problem with parking on both sides, as it is reduced
to the extent that two cars cannot pass and often times people parking their
cars will use the street as a sidewalk, and passenger /vehicular conflict
is of concern. Additionally, at least in the winter time, there is difficulty
for selected residents to back out onto 56th and also problems associated
with parking too close to driveways and too close to the corners.
As the significant problem is two hours on Monday evenings,__Colony Park, in
an effort to be a good neighbor has indicated an extreme willingness to
work towards a voluntary solution in working with the attendees of the class
to have them park on only one side of the street when they come on Monday
evenings, identify areas where they can also park on one side of the street
which gives them similar walking distance to the Church back on Tower, etc.
Additionally, the Church asked the residents to bring any concerns directly
to them, including persons who park on.,both sides so that they can ask to
have their cars removed.
It appears at this juncture that the voluntary efforts on the part of both
Colony Park and the residents to work together should eliminate the need
-2-
for a City- imposed solution. It is suggested, however, that in the
future should this solution fail or other problems arise that Traffic
Safety again review the problem and possibly look at the following solutions:
a) Removal of the one -side parking on Sundays signs, as this has not
been a problem since Colony Park has been there.
b) Prohibiting one -sided parking on 56th on Monday nights only.
Should you have any further comments or questions, I will be present at the
meeting to respond. It is recommended that this memo, together with a copy
of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes, be forwarded to the original
requestor and the attending residents, including Colony Park Baptist Church.
MB /sw
Attachment
Aric Lrtll)'�
COLONY
r PARK
5532 WOODDALE AVENUE • E •
DINA, MINNESOTA 55424 612/920 -4767
January 11, 1985
Mr. Mark Bernhardson
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mark,
The meeting last night went well from my perspective. Thank you
for your sensitive concern and solid leadership. It is appreciated
by those of us at Colony Park.
Following the meeting, I visited with John Clausen in the parking
lot. Very frankly, John feels that an imposed long term policy is
needed, not a voluntary solution. Nevertheless, I indicated to
John that I would be visiting with Mary Johnson, the administrator
for Bible Study Fellowship, concerning our voluntary plan to re-
position parked cars on West 56th Street.
Last night l drove through 56th Street and noted the positioning
of the driveways. I would like to suggest an alternative proposal.
Let's have the Bible Study Fellowship ladies assign designated
porkers for West 56th Street. First, they would allow a greater
margin of safety near each driveway. Second, they are not to
park across from any driveways. Third, that they clear out the
stretch in front of Mr. Clausen's home at 4528. Fourth, that they
park back from the corners so as to not crowd the openings of any
of the streets.
If you have any questions about this, Mark, please give me a call.
Best wishes for a productive and enjoyable 1985.
Warmly,
Dennis N. Baker
Senior Pastor
Li I Honoring God by equipping people to disciple the nations.
Washington Square Advisers
PAUL D. JOHNSON
VICE PRESIDENT - MORTGAGE LOAN 8 REAL ESTATE
612) 342.3632
January 16, 1985
City Clerk Y
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota
RE: West 70th Street Traffic Safety Study
Please have read into the minutes of the Edina City Council regularly
scheduled meeting of January 21, 1985, the following letter:
To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council of the City of Edina:
Due to an out of town business commitment, I am unable to attend the City
Council meeting of January 21, 1985. As a member of the Citizens Advisory
Group for traffic safety on West 70th Street, appointed by you, I wish to
comment as follows:
f" �
1. I wish to thank the Mayor and City Council for appointing me to this
Advisory Committee. It has been a pleasure and an education to serve in
this capacity.
2. I have reviewed the draft of the final report which Mr. Peter A. Fausch
will be presenting to you on Monday evening, January 21, 1985. As a
member of the Advisory Committee, a member of the board of the Cornelia
School PTA, and a resident of the 70th Street and Cornelia Drive
neighborhood, I concur in the recommendations contained in the report and
support it fully.
3. I would like to commend Mr. Fausch and his staff as well as the staff and
employees of the City of Edina who were involved in the collection of
data for this report. The work was thorough, well documented, and
conducted in an expeditious manner.
.4. Finally, I wish to thank the Mayor and City Council for commissioning
this study and respectfully request that you accept the recommendations
contained in the study and proceed in a timely manner to accomplish the
work required by these recommendations.
You s truly,
Paul D. J nson-
7108 Glouchester Avenue '
Edina, MN 55435
CC: Peter A. Fausch, P.E.
512 NICOLLET MALL - BOX 9402 - MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55440
A Division of Washington Square Capital, Inc.
T C
;; s� ti•,•
S NEIDER y 1�I o ADD. 3, 3��,�i
)
w 2g� T 0^ l� D I N A ��� 3 m 3Lao; �78 .� !i f c,A .
3 •\1')50 8850 !% 1:5 s0 mod• 30130 Cl' ���rtr� .t�R
„e•,�r 20 's •s,. 'Lj ;.�s Bit *e
as t5n7 :BGJ 'f� _ ;•
Is _r3
d � � � '19.3' •; "�jy���; •�.�
•°,.44 !. fit' i 2f•° : �1` 4
T m
r" ` � of •
i 330 o G = o r
•'',J.
s
° �F
3 I y�
•r' � O t,3
n
0 %At ? A. S
100 1�S 100 Je f. Co .co loo Ioc.o5
9'•
•,�,,•.' ..� ALT R _( i .I
�'I
1 6 o N p , 3 � 4
_ • �0 £a t .co too 00 I !Y45
`
v
•
in
' + � (I. •-
r
1 LARKSPURraa� 4:.16 U51 Q \•s �;.
-2, C °J �i
j° 77 !j ! r `'�
Y �LAKE pINA ADD
a, J11 'ro .
0 .:' y; 4 ` nif,f BOCK ON
REPL
Z `r0 ° da '113 t �� Grl�• Sr • 1 ti .' r
•a
10 n
r• I`fl n�••" <e a'f! a- r _t Vl i\�•1 `a 71J s •' s� AD
2 V °�w
ASP ASIA
N 1:..� ..':,t 11 •. fir' *�. •'' d� t• �J'f� . r0 �'• r ,
•+�l'E • of "'P d i 10 °dtisD
�q° r ,*Bj,� r � , h�n •�f le e t � ' ) D ! °� I 1( �, ►c • N, l ` • \ s l y . L � h.r � wvp� , . i � : y, .• °y • t y �Cyt .: \ ./ li - ti S ' •- d � • � aO`0•:S(` IiC t � . i 'li I l ,.7 u , o F J�ro Mvfc* l - bo% ' o 20 di , 0 6 �' J�) w v } ._g.. N Io �, c . M . � � . i `. aJ t eJ rr: e o1L ' S 9 lo : l 9 w q�) o " f • SN Y o. ' 4 ;,) o , '- � k. a��. 1r{p1 ob�� i?1� o � S .,' , J e1 _ ", 1 `s 4 0' S 1`► { 0i e 1 !1 0 �`^4r ,• � y` { S e•R' � ', _ ., ` D� ! d4 �/ .6 ,4g �,4 1 �1 •F �' J 3 ° S' "I b 0' • - b " 1 � t .��•'�c�S y`, .1 D,[ o �S 1• ' �► 1•' S4 .� .' � . a� ; _ +_ �° o Z A o^ ' : : ' ► - r .v ,.'tf s • ,! C �� ••aR ' •• . ,< .� l t • 899 " 7 N, lI (` 5 L � � I
' ' •�. o . a •i �tt - :\ � R � i
•
o 1` 2 15. . ! S 56 'v •1 8 ' :oZ ^`�� + r ' , � '�i� a'^ lc . . '( ` _r' >� G•/ ,O O ,'} � .\ 6 - 7"4 4� fi. * 6 �� ,_ \ ` \t 1; O� � .
'e • .
L-_�o
j 1! a
, 0
� !ojt�. wes Z 3 IO
p:5• °5 " '
; 2S 6 d
76
7. 1
) 1
t` '
.19
S s �
0t� we 03RJ , S ° •' 4 / 01.11 Dl c� 1166 65
ift 4 � 100 : 0 Wesf v
. 2 5 12 a `30 13 30 I.-N, 130 sto !1] Z
22 i` s 9 I 0 j
t. J"S1)T i„%l � � (C :20 t 0 ! N 2t 04 09 t'
20 o5I :
• t
r
Inp• �(° [t:`°.. „rL lj M�? n �1 �J 13 1
i5'r•M ,;c,)tile•- to^t�- •�'.. ;r Rei Ze,
o. i ` ��:� N) ^.a.i •
A.
•I'ot �0ii �S�• 11 Sk :� - 30' ?x /55 I
,s• ! 15 �� j� (3►.31 3 Voo 1.0 *�U z 3r
`'°"' r1 "'� - — - i4M►J� °v�130`+ " 3 ' 14 .66 jai ^� 1 S /fod ��f 1
�• �i• \
1 =�. s.••a j t.,' IN ..�; t 'in 0 S •'4E'N ��/ t 1!'.n ^�/ - _j 10
1 �• 114" : • .: G O e- �. n ,
't..t �£` �.. Sd9'46 W . r �� 115653 . 3
�► � OF 0 �9; �, 1� 12° I� 814' N
IF
ZIT 5 4 k -_ �A r
`', �•. .BL lc 6� w000HILL �Edlna. Minnt'��Ita�N!►: —�� �b w t��29o''" 2 -`�/
,.r • • se• sa . e .s: •tom s 3 1 • Gr O /oa
'r cd s,�� •c•:! •e•s/ -t• e ,,, , e� = ° 3 �a• /¢i s'o•;•J. I. �1?S,_65 d !'�'1S
rr r ° �•ss'► °c •o0 900 •0 , go- �:4' A� . �1 6 %'' _1i0 ' e / s 30 /OILS 3 0 /8� 4 '0657
��. iv CBI) °n ,.,� ,30� 58�•4s'M � :'J, . �:/ _ 10 `n ( '� .4
S T i / o= °• c` o' _ S9 t6'IV� U e, 90. F'ocrg !•�II o 4 5 r tt
rvv2 •+ 0 2 0 0 19 f 8 a ,!. 1?• o ..: 5 f Yl.: •�!ij ° o =o
C /�JZsi • °- ` �,�G� r �S}r�•:#4 ' �p � , � 31' 3C /11i� l 3C; � ' � _ =�AA� — 'r•�° 3�� 30 �14
d i map e0 01 o a /?rG5 l: �O t 956 9'f /OZie��e
x89'46 ..a '0 �+ °o- 38; 3 lq. 33. 26 t
•_ y -
?- !o ,r 1t ;] e + v °! `• P' do d5 2 �s Ile 1179 1).41 I*? • �e
DEL EYlS
3
S H �14� 1 h� }1� ., DD ION l 1 .• (�3 . 2
/ ro d- 1r 5' laJ �PS.t �S I G �� g,
If.l ,o Ito X .� 41
> >° IJ dz I' dr Po �� • cs do 5 .
\ s
) 1 t l \
J7
q • . (}Vr) a' j v �51 r.'•J ° �2'; r' U
6 al 7 8 �i r \l �L
C,e Iv�L �9 J? t.. x • ,�}1l =�Gti1 •� (�, "' . 9 10 : r s
i s L� o d Sd z y� ec tcs w' • cr
Z4? Pf ? It •a• f 2 + /a) h h JS Sr tr U ;� V vn t. M J7 Sr'sr
�I� / • ' b
ANDOVER J 471 d• ROAI I �n /�
6 ,� i u x1.11- Rw J• td •1 Jc rc >, Sr•': � V I uFR
4 L�w6 -L,6 •4s'sr a'1 �' SJ e 4 �M .. J o 7 R ( \�� 3 !'� 1
6j,% -tc Ss �'0 W ! 6 .3 11>``4' �24� °- (23) tIP 2� , �'.a -f� tio" �! 2
bp O �� .• dj1 ae , 4. 1I' °. Al
19 h 1 M`�p
nr C Y
ti N ' 1A ?* 0��9 310" tl w 12 3° !; +,�
S �° 9 11,1 . a:� isir a�17i 133 L` a it rt
R N E °O/ is •:c r 90 !•�! jJ\
♦S• V J'i Jl -t0 Y °S. llti)de•�� 4 5 r% 4
14 BELVIDERE $ LANE
R tdd cc r tiJ tc a <tT! d 5 7.i, K .Q )S
n!J a-rstl.'ari•tt dl +� .41, �b$t t .Y iS
L •i►. ..i = "ti.� .. y • r tfyv f:C L_.. K'�' 11 f'�,ti'
� �' �� . •� {i i x.71 .� ��;��•j�
' f .a- � Q• 1 :.fit 4 r a. 'S•�
A
_ • • ` �... •� 2: �� � yl:.•ti:: .= 'tea '- � _ �.�`� ,•
IL
It :All
r 9 , L
ff Lc
.ii -.• c t '' st
.r.T �: •d 1�.7i•. °""�:';,--.lt' -i z.�,,,•wFs _'ST'�'q'r.�' .,,,, y `:.
'S,j 'r c ' •s lea �� s -
r.
� : �'` � Y� *s:� ,,• � �-, ' • ` ; . 1 '41
.r ��s ~t f 'iv 'si_ 'y i S y t 'S 6 i• .�� ,.., _
r'•. tk '�'_ a�vF +r -.t •%� ." 1lt - - -�' w' ... + ?'t '•`.r,
s. �'• , `• ~�r� � t *1E' i;� _F j�,. -'� �j. ': � •�/ . *• •?' a 1
-lc -`��' `sit. •�� - 8<- i ;'- ^'�• '!' �`,i.` ��" Y E •`� :•� • •- • � - ;t. s .�,�.. -� • :;
y' Y� K 'S7 n� -♦ in •..V.•. ►.. w_ wl.i
ft�3� ?r'f"aa✓_""�ry�, - t.,$F..X �`rxG,• '�`¢�•4•�yy.►,;t A,.. r,r,�,` °t 'y�'- '"!"�r `� f�
,Z 7 '� .. - s h 'S k '7!'�•v.N 1 t! ... O t .ai ,y,_ � • t fy ..' 1
ti x � _ L .` �.f •.. .a -� �. y ��'a� • •n "r .f�K: �. ~�' O ) ti'4� `~ .. .� ..': I�r � �- •�
�.T�y; J`� �a ���.'` ° f+ r': •. i tom.,..'.. '�0�,
_ �titi.G t rf '"r'�`� -t - } t` ��, r }r a i .. -'4• r� ' Y ti-' k: �:.., q... =wyy 't _, ti`_S� •.►.
' i _ ` Y 1 "" .•ea y� • t.,IP.v..+{ii siy` t ri ♦.
Y t{� :iYi"T .cr
Ttr
ne 3 � :a� i may} z - `i�%: *'�, i -; - r.. _ y..� , � `s� � :' :.� : s .� M�• �` sa • _ 3: 1
Z nvL' •-� �• ,+'w!•,�{w•�•=�: ~' '! � } +.w iO- _� �•�A� •� �: `��ys i v' :t��
,r.
i
T
e
w
--tip
January 14, 1985
The Honorable C. -Wayne Courtney
Mayor of the City of Ed.ina
and.
The Honorable City Council
Members
Strgar- Roscoe, Inc., consultant engineers, will
present its recomme`nd.ations resulting from its
West 70th Street Traffic Operations and. Safety
Study on Janurary 2I, 1985.
There are -some areas of the study which need
amplification so that certain assumptions will
not develop which would.possibly lead. to some
consideration of interim or temporarary actions
which'will dilute and. negate the recommend.a-
tions.
Therefore, I will appreciate you providing the
necessary time to be heard. along with others
that support the recommendations as presented.
with no intr!rim or quick fix action that will
dilute the consultants plan.
We thank you for your pant objective manner
in considering our traffic problem on West
70th street.
Harold. E. Babb
470I West 70th Street
Edina, Din. 5511.35
'ncerely,
Harold. E. Babb
Advisory Committee
-Js� �
j
January 10, 1985
C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN. 55424
Dear Mr. Courtney:
I have been a resident at the southeast corner of the inter-
section of West Shore Drive and W. 70th Street for 22 years and am
greatly concerned about the traffic safety on W. 70th Street.
I have read the draft copy of the "'Nest 70th Street Traffic
Operations and Safety Study" and believe that in general it is a
sensible approach to the existing problems. The recommendations
set forth include practical steps, in particular the proposal to
stripe the street as a two lane roadway consistent with the stan-
dard operating capabilities of a 40 foot wide street., with left
turn lanes, improved stop lines: and crosswalk markings.
There axe some points that I would like to comment upon.
Continued random saturation enforcement. programs during all
hours of the day should remind the regular users of IN. 70th Street
that traffic laws will be enforced. The study observation that
1185th percentile speed is 37 m.p.h. (15 percent are higher)" would
indicate-:that almost all drivers on W. 70th Street exceed the 30
m.p.h. speed limit. Exc -essive speed is still one of the major prob-
lems. Speeding cars naturally intimidate drivers who are waiting
to enter W. 70th Street.
I.question the statement that "currently traffic on W. Shore
'Drive must -wait an average of 2.28 minutes to cross (enter) 70th St.
in .eak period." My driveway is approximately two car lengths from
the stop sign and very rarely do I have to wait for traffic to clear
before I can back out onto W. Shore Drive. From my own observations
I would say that the wait at the stop sign is more in the range of
12 to 15 seconds. A four way stop is,not needelat this intersection;
especially not on a temporary basis, which would only tend to fur-
ther complicate an already confused situation.
I am oppose d also to a traffic signal light at "Jest Shore
Drive. Provision for a signal is the very last suggestion made by
the study, and then only if improvement does not come about as a
result of any other measures recommended in 9 paragraphs in the
"Recommendation" section of the study. There are many more dis-
advantages the advantages to a signal at the W. Shore Drive and
70th Street intersection, and also many alternate solutions.
Has a study been made as to the possibility'b f somehow making
66th Street between Hwy. 100 and Valley View Road an alternate
East /West collector street to serve the Southdale area and provide
traffic volume relief on W. 70th Street?
Thank you for allowing me to express my views. I trust that--
you and the Council members will consider the permanent effects
upon the residentsof the IV. 70th Street area when making your final
decisions on this matter.
copies: City Council Members
Harold E. Babb
Sincerely,
Bohn W. Thompson
7001 West Shore Drive
Edina, MN 5545
TO:
COUNCIL MEMBERS
MEMORANDUM
FROM: C. WAYNE COURTNEY, MAYOR
SUBJECT: VACANCIES ON BOARDS /COMMISSIONS
DATE: JANUARY 17, 1985
Listed below are the various Boards or Commissions on which there are still
vacancies to be filled. I would appreciate your giving me any names of
persons you might recommend for these positions so that we can appoint
individuals to those positions at the Council Meeting of February 4:
Board of Appeals and Adjustments (3 yr terms - rotation to be.implemented
Human Relations Commission
Heritage Preservation Board
-C
beginning 2 -1 -85 - Meets 1st and 3rd Thursday)
(3 yr terms - Meets 3rd Tuesday)
(School Appointee)
(2 yr terms - Meets 4th Tuesday)
Advisory Board of Healih (2 yr terms - Meets on call, min. 4 mtgs. yr)
Consumer
Consumer
Consumer
MEMORANDUM
TO: COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: MAYOR COURTNEY
SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT TO STATE CHS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
DATE: JANUARY 18, 1985
Barbara Reynolds, Chairman of the Edina Advisory Board of Health, has
contacted me with the recommendation that Dr. Sharon Aadalen, 4924 Dale
Drive,be appointed to the State CHS Advisory Committee as representative
from Edina. (This was the position held by June Schmidt and she has
resigned from that Committee.)
Mrs. Reynolds would like to have an appointee to the Committee so that
the individual can attend the next scheduled meeting on January 25, 1985.
If you concur, I will also be recommending that Dr. Sharon Aadalen also
be, appointed to the Edina Advisory Board of Health when we make those
appointments in February.
s
L
TO: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER
FROM: Bob Kojetin
DATE: January 17, 1985
RE: TREE TRIMMING PROJECT - SET HEARING DATE
The following improvement has been investigated and it has been determined
that it is feasible and in the best interest of the City of Edina:
PROJECT AND LOCATION ESTIMATED COST
P -TT -03
Tree Trimming Project with assessment
to the home owners, for boulevard trees
in the Northwest Quadrant of the City
of Edina. $60 per tree
Exact location: The area bounded by
Crosstown Highway to the Northern Boundary
line and from Highway 100 to the Western
Boundary Line (County Raod 18)
Total number of trees to be trimmed is 1604. $96,240 TOTAL
This project should be an assessed project to the homeowners with an assessment
only for trees trimmed. The proposed hearing date would be March 4, 1985.
. BK:mk
'L
•• -
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: January 18, 1985
TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members
FROM: Ken Rosl and , City Manager
SUBJECT: WINE LICENSING
Following the advisory referendum on wine licensing on November 6, 1984,
in which 77.4% of the registered voters cast a ballot in the election,
the Council directed staff to bring back information and an ordinance
regarding on -sale wine licensing. Of the 30,331 people who voted in the
election, 85% expressed an opinion on wine -only licensing, with 19,697
voting "Yes" and 6,141 voting "No," representing a 76.2% approval rate
by those voting on the issue.
Attached to this memorandum are the following items:
- Issues and Alternatives Identification - This is a list of items
identified by staff, together with alternatives and recommendations
developed for the eventual development of an ordinance.
- Draft Ordinance - This is the staff recommendation subject to refinement
by council direction to incorporate on -sale wine licensing within the
current Edina liquor licensing ordinance.
- List of Potential Applicants - Based on information from the Edina
Chamber of Commerce, these are restaurants who expressed an interest
in application for wine -only licensing:
The fallowing represents one suggested way the Council may consider this
issue:
- Publ i'c Input
In addition to the results of the advisory poll from the 6th, the
Council may desire to receive additional testimony from interested
parties regarding both a general issue of whether wine -only licensing
should be permitted in the City, together with any specifics regarding
an ordinance, should such be enacted.
- Issue of On -Sale Wine Licenses
The Council may then consider whether they desire to permit on -sale
wine licensing or not.
- Wine License Ordinance
Should the Council desire to go further into the development of an
ordinance, it is suggested that you:
- IderRify any additional issues or alternatives
- Indicate different directions than those included either in the draft
ordinance or staff recommendation
January 18, 1985
Mayor & Council
Page Two
- Development of Draft Ordinance
Once the Council has decided the issue or issues and the desire
included in the ordinance, the staff can revise the draft ordinance
for first reading.
Fees are not presently included in the Draft ordinance, since it would most
appropriately be put in Ordinance 171 governing fees. It is suggested that
the wine -only fees be set in the range of $550 to $650. As has also
been identified, there may be an issue relating to the licenses to our country
clubs as to the State law regarding the fee that can be charged for on -sale
wine identifies a relationship to on -sale licenses. This is presently being
researched with the State's Attorney General's office.
Should you have any further questions, staff will be happy to respond or work
to develop the research needed.
KR /sw
Attachments
ex
AREA I ISSUES MANAGER /STAFF RECOMMENDATION
General Ordinance
Financial
A. Duration of Ordinance
B. Number of Licenses
C. Ongoing Enforcement
D. Application
Information needed
Amount required by ord.
E. City access to:
- Financial records
- Property''
roperty ..._. "
F. Temporary Licenses
G. Proration of Fee
H. Time in Business
A. Investigative Fees
- Initial
- Ongoing
B. Deposit for Investigation
C. Licensing Fees
D. Bond
E. Insurance
F. Amount of investment
G. % of sales
H. Eligibility based on taxes, fees, assessments
I. Transfer (other ?)
J. Financial review - indebtedness
A. Ongoing
B. No limit
C. Minimum two per year /in ord.
D. BCA application plus enough to determine
ordinance requirements met
E. Not unless sales % set
As at present
F. Not permitted upder State law
G. Quarterly
H. Comment; Beer has 6 -mon. minimum unless 4/5's
A. Actual cost within limits waived
Up to $100 unless ownership changes signifi-
cantly - 50%
Or designated person in charge
B. $500 /in state - if going out of state, $2000.
Refund amount unused.
C. Estimated cost $500 -550
D. State maximum - $5000
E. State requirement
F. Nothing apart from approved kitchen
G. No
H. Yes
I. 50% change in ownership /change in form
J. Requirement as to sources and amounts
AREA
Condition of Sale
General
Conditions of Sale/
Business
IA. Limitation to Food
B. Qualification as Food Establishment
C. Hours of Sale
D. Area of Service Limitation
E. Age of Worker
F. Size of Serving Container.
G. Amusement Devices
H. Live Entertainment
A. Degree of Change Requiring Re- Licensing
B. Compliance with Applicable City Codes
C. Impact on Present Food Storage /Prep. /Service
Individual Licenses [A. Of whom required
B. Ineligible persons
MANAGER /STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Prohibit sales at bar (counter ?)
- Requirement to have fully equipped kitchen
A. Bloomington language - in conjunction with
food /meal
B. Must possess valid health licenses
C. Same as beer /clubs
D. - Must be consumed on premises of owner
- Rooms designated on plans
- Physical barrier
- Public concourse
- Outside of building excluded
E. Age of persons working /State law
F. Limit service to under one liter container
G. Same as beer
A. Any alteration effecting zoning, seating,
space of seating or serving areas, storage
of food /wine
B. Must be in ongoing compliance with applicable
codes
C. Sufficient product storage
- Not effecting proper food storage /prep/
service areas
A. Manager does not recommend
Staff does recommend for wine -only for
anyone actually serving
B. Disqualified if not of age or any law violation
- Liquor, gambling, etc.
Index
AREA ISSUES MANAGER /STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Conditions Prohib- - Good moral character
iting Licensing
Issue to Persons - Individual, partnership, corporation
- U. S. citizen
Limiting Conditions /Persons
Conditions Required of Location /Prohibiting Locati
- Legal age
- Criminal record /5 years
- Liquor, gambling, other controlled
substances, theft and vice
- Revocation of liquor licenses
- No limitation on # of licenses; person /spouse
can have interest
Non compatible activities
- Manufacturer /wholesaler of intoxicating
liquor
- Federal /wholesale /retail liquor dealers
or gambling license
- City of Edina employees or elected officers
Falsification of information
No restriction on who can be a building owner
Designated person (partnership /corporation) in
charge. -must meet same requirements as individual
licensee, plus have an individual mgr. license
On renewal denial:
- Violations of sale conditions
- Failure to pass applicable codes
- Zoning limited•to C1, C2, C3, mixed use and
restaurants permitted in R1 districts
- No limit from specific buildings, schools, etc.
- Parking tied to seating
- Common entrance?
II - 25 -seat minimum
- No square foot requirements
ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A2
DRAFT ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING NO. 902 TO
ALLOW SALES OF WINE ONLY IN
FOOD ESTABLISMENTS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Definitions. To Section 1 the following definitions are added:
Bar - A counter at which wine is served but such service is not in conjunction
with regular full menu service at counter.
City - City means the City of Edina.
Council - Council means the Council of the City of Edina.
Licensed premise - Area shown in the application as the place where wine will be
served and consumed.
Meal - Meal means entrees and sandwiches offered on a restaurant menu.
Person - Person means and includes any individual, partnership, association,
trust, institution, corporation, or municipality, and includes also the municipal
liquor store.
Restaurants - means an establishment, under control of a single proprietor or
manager, having appropriate facilities for serving meals and where in consideration
of payment therefore, meals are regularly served at tables to the general public, and
which employs an adequate staff to provide the usual and suitable service to its
guests.
Wine- A vinous beverage created by fermentation.
Sec. 2. Sec. 21, No Liquor in Restaurants, is hereby amended by adding the
words "except as permitted under Part H of this Ordinance."
Sec. 3. Part H is hereby added as follows:
"PART H. ON SALE OF WINE ONLY IN RESTAURANTS"
Sec. 36. License Required.
(a) No person shall, directly or indirectly, upon any pretense or by any device
sell for on -sale or off -4ale any wine at or under 14% per volume in conjunction
with the-sale of food without first having received a license therefor.
(b) On -sale wine licenses shall be granted only to qualifying restaurants, as
outlined below, holding a valid food establishment license under Ordinance 731.
Sec. 37. Licensing Procedure.
(a) The provisions of Ordinance No. 141 of the City including the penalty
provisions thereof shall apply to all licenses required by this Ordinance for
the sale of wine only and to the holders of such licenses, except that licenses
and renewals thereof shall be granted or denied by the Council. Additionally,
all licenses must be approved by the Commissioner of Public Safety. Every
person licensed, or applying for a license, under this ordinance, in addition to
other requirements imposed by this ordinance for the obtaining or renewal of
alicense, shall demonstrate proof of financial responsibility with regard to a
condition to the issuance or renewal of such license, in the manner and to the
extent required by Minnesota Statute, Section 340.11, Subdivision 21, provided,
if any licensee or applicant claims exemption from the requirements of said
statute, proof of such exemption shall be established by affidavit given by such
licensee or applicant, such affidavit to be in form and substance acceptable to
the City Clerk.
(b) In addition to the requirements set forth in Paragraph (a) of this section,
the applicant shall in application form provide all information required by the
State of Minnesota Department of Public Safety and such other information as
deemed necessary by the City during the application process to determine
compliance with the provisions of this ordinance.
(c) Applications for the renewal of an existing license shall be made at least
60 days prior to and not earlier than 150 days prior to the date of expiration
of the license. The renewal application may incorporate by reference all
information contained in the original application, to the extent such
information is then true, current, and applicable. If, in the judgment of the
City Council, good and sufficient cause for the applicant's failure to apply for
a renewal within the time provided is shown, the City Council may, if the other
provisions of this ordinance are complied with, grant the application
notwithstanding such failure to timely apply.
(d) No license shall be transferred to any person or premises by the person or
from the premises to whom and for which the license was granted, by any means
whatsoever, including, without limitation, defise, descent, or involuntarily by
the operation of law, without the person and premises to whom and to which the
license is to be transferred having first submitted an application containing
all of the information rquired in an original application, and complying with
all requirements for an original license, and receiving the approval of the
Council, and where required, the Commissioner of Public Safety, provided that an
application for transfer may refer to, and incorporate therein by reference, the
information set forth in the original application for the license to be
transferred, to the extent such information is then true, current and
applicable.
(e) Any change in the persons named as partners as required by names listed of
this ordinance and any change in the original application as required by Sec. 37
of this ordinance, including managers or persons in charge of the premises to be
licensed, or change in designated area or seating, shall be deemed a transfer
for purposes of this ordinance; provided, however, if the licensee is a limited
partnership, a change in the limited partners of less than 10% cumulatively over
the then license period, shall not be deemed a transfer; and provided further,
however, that the change of stock owner of 10% or less in a corporate licensee
shall not be deemed a transfer.
Sec. 38. Financial Requirements.
(a) Investigation Fees and Deposit - At the time of original application, the
applicant shall deposit $500 with the City of Edina for the Investigation Fee.
Should the investigation require an out -of -state investigation, an additional
$2000 shall be deposited prior to further processing of the application by the
City. The cost of the investigation shall be based "on the expense involved, but
in no event shall it exceed $500 if the investigation is limited to the State of
Minnesota or $10,000 if outside the State. All deposit monies not expended on
the investigation shall be either applied to the license fee or refunded to the
applicant. All investigative expenses incurred in excess of the deposit shall
be paid prior to consideration of the license application by the Council.
Investigation fees for license renewal shall not exceed $100 unless there is a
change of ownership of more than 10%.
(b) License Fees - The applicable fee is listed in Ordinance 171. Licenses
terminated prior to the end of the term shall be prorated quarterly with fees
being refunded for any quarter or quarters in which the license was not used.
All fees shall be paid prior to consideration of license application by the
Council. Should any license be denied, the fee shall be refunded except for
$75.00.
(c) Bond - The same requirements set forth in Sec. 11 of this ordinance applies
to licenses under Part H.
(d) Other Fees - All fees, assessments and taxes delinquent at issuance must be
paid prior to issuance of the license as outlined in Sec. 12 (f) of this
ordinance.
Sec. 39. Conditions of Licensing. In addition to the conditions set forth in
Sec. 12 (d) and (e) and Sec. 13 (d), the following conditions apply both as a
condition of license approval and ongoing license retention:
(a) Licensee - The licensee must;
1) Be of good moral character and repute.
2) Be of legal drinking age.
3) Be not ineligible under Minnesota Statutes Ch. 340.
4) If not an individual owner is either a partnership or a corporation.
5) If an individual not have within the five years prior to the
application for a license been conficted of any violation of any law of
the United States, the State of Minnesota, or any other state or
territory, or of any local ordinance: a) with regard to the
manufacture, sale, distribution or possession for sale or distribution
of intoxicating liquor or other controlled substances; b) gambling; c)
theft; d) vice; or e) who has had an intoxicating liquor license ;'
including a wine -only on -sale license revoked for any violation of any ,'
such laws or ordinance.
6) If a partnership or corporation must have a person a charge or manager
who is generally present on the licensed premises who would be eligible
pursuant to the provisions of this ordinance for a Part H license to be
issued directly to him as an individual licensee. This person is to
hold an individual manager's license and must sign a statement
indicating he has reviewed and understands the pertinent sections of
this Ordinance. The fee is set forth in Ordinance 171.
7) Not have applied for nor hold a federal wholesale or retail liquor
dealer's special stamp or a federal or state gambling or gaming stamp
or license.
8) Not be an employee or elected offidial of the City of Edina.
9) Not falsify any information given either in application or in the
process of investigation.
10) On renewal not have been found in violation of any conditions of -sale.
11) If an individual must be a U.S. citizen.
12) Not be financially indebted to a person who is disqualifed under
Subparagraphs 5, 7 and 11.
(b) Licensed Premises - The licensed premises must meet the following
requirements:
1) Is in a Cl, C2 or C3 or mixed -use zone or an authorized restaurant in
R -1.
2) That it have a separate entrance or exit to the exterior from any
business or building not under control of the licensee. Entrance or exit
to a public concourse or public lobby meets this requirement.
3) That has a minimum of 25 seats at tables or booths in the designated
area for service.
4) The licensed premises must be under the control of the licensee.
5) That a licensed premise have a valid food establishment license nd that
it have a fully equipped and approved kitchen.
6) That appropriate space for storage, preparation or other handling or
service of food not be adversely impacted by the storage and service of
wine.
7) That a physical barrier must be placed between the public and the area
where wine is served, except for approved or required entrances and
exits to those areas.
8) Not outside a building unless the only access to and from the
designated outside area is through the enclosed license restaurant.
9) Have the proposed licensed premises be in accordance with all
applicable codes.
Sec. 40. Conditions of Sale. That in addition to the conditions stated in
Section 12 (a), (b), (g) and (h); Sec. 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 31 and 33,
the following apply:
(a) No person shall be sold, served, or consume wine who does not order a meal
to be consumed with the wine.
(b) No wine over 147 alcohol by volume may be sold or consumed.
(c) No wine sales or consumption are permitted at a bar or beyond the licensed
premises.
(d) Wine may not be sold, served or consumed in containers larger in volume
than one liter.
(e) No person working in the designated area may be under the established legal
drinking age except busboys, dishwashers and musicians.
(f) No licensee shall promote the consumption of wine on the licensed premises
by an means or methods which results in wine prices which are less than those
normally chanrged on the'then regularly used menu, including, but not limited
to, two for one or similar offers, prizes, coupons, games or barters.
(g) No licensee shall sell, offer for sale, or keep for sale intoxicating
liquors in any original package that has been refilled or partly refilled. No
licensee shall directly or through any other person dilute, or in any manner
tamper with, the contents of any original package so as to change its
composition or alcoholic content while in the original package. Possession on
the premises by the licensee of any intoxicating liquor in the original package
differing in composition, alcoholic content or type from the liquor received
from the manufacturer or wholesaler from whom it was purchased, shall be prima
facie evidence that the contents of the original package have been diluted,
changed or tampered with.
(i) Licensees under Part H may sell wine as permitted from 12 o'clock noon to
12 o'clock midnight Sundays.
(j) Can anticipate at least two inspections by the licensing authority
annually.
Sec. 41. Suspension and Revocation. The enforcement, suspension and
revocation provisions of Ordinance No. 141 shall apply to all licenses issued
under Part B of this ordinance.
Sec. 42. Individual Licensing of Servers.
(a) All personnel who physically serve wine to patrons must possess an
individual server's license issued by the City. This does not prohibit
unlicensed personnel from taking orders for wine in conjunction with the sale of
food, but it may only be served by licensed personnel.
(b) In order to be licensed, servers must meet the requirements set forth in
Sec. 39 (a) (1, 2, 5, 9 and 11), together with signed statement indicating they
have reviewed and understand the pertinent sections of this ordinance.
(c) The license fee is set forth in Ordinance 171 and is not prorated upon
termination.
Szechuan Star
3655 Hazelton Rd.
175
Seats
Brothers Deli
50th and France
185
Seats
Empress
Yorktown Mall
80
Seats
J.P.'s
5125 Vernon
175
Seats
Palm Court
Southdale Center
118
Seats
Daytons
Southdale Center
200
Seats
York Steak House
Southdale Center
252
Seats
Good Earth
Galleria
120
Seats
Vie de France
Galleria
144
Seats
Le Bistro Cafe
Yorktown Mall
167
Seats
Pantry
5101 Arcadia
115
Seats
Ediner
Galleria
110
Seats
.Original Pancake House
3501 W. 70th St.
122
seats
Rigotto's Pizza
45022 Valley View Rd.
95
Seats
Southdale Bowl and Black
Swan Pub
3401 W. 69th St
75
Seats
MEMORANDUM
TO: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER
FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: EASEMENT VACATION GRANTED 8/6/84 - Lot 6, Blk 1 - The Habitat
DATE: JANUARY 18, 1985
At its meeting of August 6, 1984, the Council granted a vacation of
easement for the above referenced property which was identified as a
"wetland easement" according to data furnished by the surveyor.
Upon presenting the resolution for recording at Hennepin County, it was
discovered that the original document identified the easement as a "drainage
and utility easement" and the County would not accept the resolution as
presented.
Revision of the Council Minutes as it relates to the resolution granting
the vacation is requested whereby all reference to "wetland easement" is
changed to "drainage and utility easement" so that the resolution can be
placed of record.
a
M
RON KRUEGER & ASSOCIATESs INC.
REGISTERED LAND SURVEYORS
7382. WASHINGTON AVENUE SO. EDEN PRAIRIE, MINN. 55344 PHONE 612- 941.3030
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
Survey for A:7yloY 720N 'E15� Job No Bk. Pa
Tti
sC: � O ����^p C•sOS�
h 0p
` 1
��� �� P/1.2T Of' wETLANO EASEMENT
.� Tb BE' `,gcATEp.
6 J9
Q
�D
` j?.qA- 10V,a6f ,stvo r�
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PROPOSED VACATION OF *ET-tMDr'EASEMENT
DRAwA&r- Ala IkTILIr�
That part of the-w(;-,t1and easement over Lot 6, Block 11 The
Habitat, lying Southeasterly of a line drawn "at right angles
to the Northeasterly line, from a point on the Northeasterly
line, a distance of 85.00 feet Northwesterly of the most
Easterly corner of said Lot 6.
I hereby certify that this Is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of .Z07- b ' 'gLoe&
Tf h /3 &7W 7" County, Minnesota and of the location of all buildings thereon, and all
visible encroachments, If any, from or on said land. Surveyed by me this daypf P% , 19
RON KRUEOPER $ ASSOCIATES, INC.
STATE REG. NO. 14374
V- N z
x
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, City Engineer
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: Project Feasibility & Authorization
The Engineering and Utility Departments have completed analysis on two problem
areas that need work during 1985.
A. The first project locations is the Valley View Bridge over the Soo Line
Railroad. The engineering department has completed testing of the deck on the
bridge and found substantial "delamination" (separation of concrete layers
and breaking away from rebars in bridge). The project proposed is to remove
the top s?ction of the deck and correct rebar sections as necessary followed
by a new concrete overlay. The estimated cost for this project is $29,373.52
which is proposed to be funded by state -aid reconstruction funds.
We recommend that this project be authorized with plans and specifications
be submitted to MNDOT State Aid office for approval.
B. The second project is Well No. 9 redevelopment on Hansen Road. This well
during the critical summer months has a reduced yield due to sand fill in
the well hole and static water level drop. The yield during 1984 was approx-
imately one half million gallons daily (350gpm). The well originally pro-
duced over one million gallons daily. The loss of this one -half million
gallon differential has considerable impact on our city system.
The proposed project is to bail out the sand in the well hole, extend the
existing column down to approximately 530 feet and reinstall "the well components.
The net result of this project would be to increase the overall yield of the
well to approximately 1.3 million gallons daily and extend the service life
of the well considerably..,(see attached letter)
The estimated cost of this project is approximately $48,000.00 to $50,000.00
.depending on the amount of sand in the hole. The funds used for this project
.would be utility funds. r
We would recommend approval of this project and authorization of plans and
specifications for same.
FJH:Im
1/18/85
SHORT- ELLIOTT- HENDRICKSON, INC.
M%12 MIN ME CONSULTING ENGINEERS
!� ® ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 0 CHIPPEWA FALLS, WISCONSIN
October 10, 1984 RE: EDINA, MINNESOTA
WELL NO. 9
SEH FILE NO. 84160
Fran Hoffman,
Director of Public Works & Engineer
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
After my meeting with you and Dick Palinka, I have reviewed the
information that we have and that I obtained from you on Well
No. 9. Below is summary of what was done:
1. Analyze the static water level drop since 1957.
2. Projected estimated future water levels.
3. Calculated anticipated pump conditions for the addition of
two and, as an alternate three, stages.
4. Calculated down thrust for motor thrust bearing capacity.
5. Calculated required motor horsepower for addition of new
stages.
6. Calculated pump shaft , stretch to obtain required pump
lateral clearance.
7. Checked both- the 15 stage and 16 stage pumps for volume
delivery versus anticipated present and future pumping
levels.
Copies of the pencil calculations sheets are enclosed for your
information.
Our recommendations are as follows:
1. Bail the material out of the well down to the bottom of the
Hinckley.
2. Add three new pump stages with maximum impeller diameter
and add approximately 100 feet of 8 inch by 1 -11/16 inch
column and shaft.
200 GOPHER BUILDING • 222 EAST LITTLE CANADA ROAD • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 • PHONE (612) 484 -0272
a
Fran Hoffman,
October 10, 1984
Page 2
3. The total length of the pump, column, suction pipe and
screen should not exceed 530 feet.
4. The new required horsepower is 181 horsepower with the
addition of three new pump stages.
5. The motor thrust bearing should have a capacity of at least
8,000 pounds.
6. The existing pump bowls should be checked for 0.65 inch
lateral and be machined to 0.65 inch lateral if necessary.
7. The new bowls should be machined for a lateral of 0.65
inches.
8. A new pump shaft will be required for the 16 stage pump.
9. The pump supplier should check motor and pump change
recommendations before supplying in order to assure
themselves that our calculations are correct.
Based on the assumption that the rate of lowering of the static
level will double every 20 years, as it has in the past 20
years, adding three stages is estimated to give you a summer
pumping yield of approximately 940 gallons a minute in 1985,
reducing to approximately 720 gallons per minute in 1995. This
results in a satisfactory yield for the next 10 years. If the
water level loss is less than anticipated, the satisfactory
yield period would be extended, and conversely if it is greater
than anticipated, it would shorten the satisfactory yield.
If there is any additional information which you may need please
let me know.
jcj
sincerely,
Norman E. Hendrickson
V '7-1-
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members
FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: METRO COUNCIL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
DATE: January 18, 1985
On Monday, January 28, the Metropolitan Council will be holding a public
hearing regarding their Solid Waste Management Development Guide /Policy
Plan. The Edina Recycling Commission has been reviewing this and are on
the agenda for Monday evening to discuss their interest and request
direction from the Council as to how they should proceed.
In a staff review of the document, the following are identified as issues
for the Council consideration:
- GENERAL
Metro Council Involvement - The degree to which the Edina City Council
feels the Metropolitan Council, as charged by the State of Minnesota,
should be involved in the issue of solid waste.
Cost of Plan Implementation - Since present landfill costs represent
10% of the solid waste disposal cost charged to the customer, the
alternative of building recycling; composting transfer stationq and
burn plants, etc., will increase the solid waste disposal cost to the
customer by 30 to 40% by 1990.
SPECIFIC MUNICIPAL CONCERNS
Contracting Area:- It is assumed by the plan that it is more efficient
for municipalities to establish contract districts and bid those or
negotiate those out to contractors rather than to permit the continuance
of the ongoing open system in which any contractor can serve any area,
resulting in several contractors going up and down the same streets.
Curb -side Recycling - Part of the recommendation to reduce the amount
of trash is to have separation of recyclables and institute in each
community curb -side recycling of such things as paper, glass and cans.
While there may be several other areas of concern in the plan, we feel these
represent the principal ones and request that the Council provide desired
direction to staff and /or Recycling Commission as it relates to this plan.
Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me.
KR /sw
i
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members
FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: COMPARABLE WORTH STUDY
DATE: January 18, 1985
Attached is a proposed resolution authorizing the City Of Edina to
participate in the Comparable Worth Study being conducted by the
MAMA Cities. It is important that the Council take action on this
matter. Also included is a bill for the amount the City will be
assessed for participation in the study. The Council should approve
this expenditure from contingencies.
The additional material is a list of participants in the Study and a
brief explanation of what the Study entails.
Ceil Smith has been serving on the Committee that is working with
Business Advisors of Control Data in the development and implementation
of the Study. If you would like further information, please contact
me or Ceil.
KR /sw
Attachment
s
S A M P L E R E S O L U T I O — N
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN THE
CONTROL DATA BUSINESS ADVISORS, INC. JOINT
COMPARABLE WORTH STUDY.
WHEREAS: Minnesota Statutes 471.991 enacted in 1984 requires all
political subdivisions in the State to establish equitable
compensation relationships among its employees; and
WHEREAS: The Metropolitan Area Management Association, the Coalition
of Outstate Cities, the Minnesota Municipal Utilities
Association and other related public jurisdictions desire to
meet the requirements of the law through a joint job
evaluation study; and
WHEREAS: The Metropolitan Area Management Association in consultation
with representatives of outstate cities and after meeting
and confering with representatives of organized labor
screened and selected Control Data Business Advisors, Inc.
as the consultant to perform the study; and
WHEREAS: The cost of the study is to be divided among the
participating jurisdictions in the following manner: Each
entity will pay a base charge of Three Thousand Dollars
($3,000.00) and a charge per employee of Thirty -five Dollars
($35.00) per person.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina
that it hereby approves participation of the City
in the Joint Comparable Worth Study to be conducted by Control Data
Business Advisors, Inc.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the sum of $10,550.00 based on
the above specified fqrmula be transmitted to the City of Golden
Valley, Minnesota which city has offered to serve as the fiscal agent
and contractor for the duration of the study.
Dated this day of , 1985.
Mayor
Clerk /Administrator /Manager
Metropolitan Area Management Affociation
of the Twin City Area
January 8, 1985
Mr. Ken Rosland
City Manager
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Mr. Rosland:
The fee assessed to your jurisdiction for participation in the Joint
Comparable Worth Study of the Metropolitan Area Management Association
and conducted by Control Data Business Advisors, Inc. is as follows:
BASE FEE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,000.00
210 Employees* x $35.00 per employee .$ 7,350.00
Search and screening of consultant . . . .$ 200.00
TOTAL DUE . . . .$10,550.00
This fee is due upon receipt of this statement.
YOUR CHECK SHOULD BE MADE PAYABLE TO THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY AND
FORWARDED ALONG WITH A COPY OF THIS STATEMENT TO:
a
Mr. William S. Joynes, City Manager
Chairman, MAMA General Labor
Relations Committee
City of Golden Valley
7800 Golden Valley Road
Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427
*If the number of employees in your jurisdiction is incorrect please
make the appropriate adjustment and extension to the statement
fowarded along with your check.
CITIES PARTICIPATING IN
JOINT COMPARABLE WORTH STUDY
Albert Lea
Maplewood
Alexandria
Mendota Heights
Anoka
Minnetonka
Apple Valley
Minnetrista
Bemidji
Moorhead
Benson
Mora .
Blaine
Morris
Bloomington
Mound
Brainerd
Mounds View
Breckenridge
New Brighton
Brooklyn Center
New Hope
Brooklyn Park
New Ulm
Burnsville
North St. Paul
Champlin
Northfield
Chaska
Oakdale
Circle Pines
Orono
Cloquet
Ortonville
Columbia Heights
Plymouth
Coon Raids
Prior Lake
Cottage Grove
Ramsey
Crookston
Redwood Falls
Crystal
Richfield
Deephaven
River Falls
Delano
Robbinsdale
Eagan
Rochester
East Grand Forks
Roseville
Eden Prairie
Rosemount
Edina
St. Anthony
Elk River
St. Cloud
Excelsior
St. James
Farmington
St. Louis Park
Fergus Falls
St. Paul Park
Forest Lake
St. Peter
Fridley
Savage
Golden Valley
Shakopee
Hastings
Shoreview
Hopkins
So. St. Paul
Inver Grove Heights
Stillwater
Lakeville
Thief River Falls
Lino Lakes
Wayzata
Litchfield
West St. Paul
Little Falls
White Bear Lake
Mankato
Winona
Maple Grove
Woodbury
1/8/85 = 88 Cities
4
J'1.'1I,I'CIE;S PARTICIPATING IN
JOINT COMPARABLE WORTH STUDY
Anoka
Brainerd
Buffalo
Chaska
Elk River
Grand Marais
Hutchinson
Marshall
Moorhead
1/8/85 = 18 Utilities
Mora
New Ulm
North St. Paul
Owatonna
Princeton
Shakopee
Thief River Falls
Virginia
Wells
OTHER ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATING IN
JOINT COMPARABLE WORTH STUDY
Metropolitan Airorts Commission
1/8/85 = 1 Other Organization
J: -m
CITY -WIDE COMPENSATION STUDY
WHAT IS A COMPENSATION STUDY? All cities in the state of Minnesota are required to study
the compensation of their employees to determine if
salaries have been established fairly. Cities must report
the results of their studies to the state by October 1,
1985.
Many cities within the metropolitan area as well as outside
the metropolitan area, have joined together to complete the
study. Control Data Business Advisors, a company of
Control Data specializing in compensation, has been hired
to assist the cities in completing the compensation
studies. In this way the process is economical and the
results are consistent.
HOW WILL THE COMPENSATION Control Data Business Advisors will use their job analysis
STUDY BE DONE? and evaluation system named FOCAS to complete the study.
The data obtained and analyzed will give each city the
information they need to meet the state's reporting
requirement.
WHAT IS FOCAS? FOCAS stands for Flexible D—Ccupational Analysis system.
FOCAS as a job analysis system is used to describe jobs and
the work employees perform. EmpjQyees are asked to provide
information about the jobs they perform using Occupational
Analysis Questionnaires (OAQs). Because employees know the
content of their jobs very well, their input into FOCAS
assures that accurate and comprehensive data can be
gathered.
FOCAS job data can
resource problems.
as a _job evaluatio
consistently value
jobs are graded ba;
job.
be used to solve a variety of human
As a compensation tool, FOCAS is used
i system to more accurately and
the work employees perform. With FOCAS,
sed on the tasks being performed in the
HOW DOES FOCAS JOB ANALYSIS Job analysis is the process of gathering information
WORK? about jobs and work in order to make effective human
resource management decisions.
The foundation of FOCAS job analysis is the Occupational
Analysis Questionnaire, or OAQ. The OAQ is a listing of
tasks, arranged by duty and subduty, an employee in a given
job area might perform. An employee completes a
questionnaire to describe his or her job by marking off the
appropriate tasks and estimating the time spent on tasks
relative to each other.
Time Spent Profiles: The OAQ data is analyzed and an
individual job description or Time Spent Profile is
produced. Each employee's job is described in terms of his
or her duties, subduties, and tasks., and the amount of time
spent on them. The data is taken directly from the
person's responses on the questionnaire. Before FOCAS is
implemented, every employee reviews the profile with his or
her manager to make sure it is accurate.
Benchmark Job Descriptions: Individual profiles are
combined to create group job descriptions. From these,
benchmark descriptions are identified. (Benchmark jobs are
jobs common across an industry and have large numbers of
people in them. Benchmarks are used to compare salaries to
the external market.)
A FOCAS benchmark job description lists the job's duties,
subduties, and tasks, and the average time spent on each
duty and subduty. It includes a narrative summary of the
job's highlights.
FOCAS job descriptions are useful in job classification and
evaluation, for recruiting, and in career planning and
development.
The FOCAS job analysis process gives us the capability to
accurately document what people do on their jobs. This
information is invaluable for effective human resources
management.
WHAT ABOUT FOCAS The grade or level of a given job is determined by the
JOB EVALUATION? value of the tasks which comprise the job. The tasks are
assigned values by large numbers of supervisors who know
the work well and who represent the entire organization.
FOCAS job evaluation is less subjective than many other
systems because the value data comes from many sources and
is consistently applied to all jobs in the job family,
regardless of location.
FOCAS job evaluation, then, is the method used to assign
grades or levels to jobs in an understandable, equitable,
and consistent manner.
.1
WHAT DO I NEED TO DO? Because the FOCAS system relies on information from
employees, supervisors, and personnel, you may be asked to
help in one or more of the phases of this process. If you
are, remember that you will be representing many other
employees who were not asked. Take that responsibility
seriously and participate as effectively as you can.
HOW WILL THE RESULTS OF THE It is too early to know the answer to this question but
COMPENSATION STUDY AFFECT ME? you will be kept informed of the results of the study and
what the next step will be.
MAMA122043
If you have any questions, please discuss them with your
supervisor or with your personnel representative.
This is an important and ambitious project but the
information that will come from it will increase the
effective use of human resources.
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its
passage and publication.
First Reading:
Second Reading: ,-
ATTEST: ' Mayor
ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A19 -
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 171
TO CORRECT FEE FOR VENTILATION -WORK PERMIT
THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section
1. The amount of the following described Fee Numbers of
Schedule A
to Ordinance
No. 171 are hereby amended to read as follows:
ORD.
SEC.
NO.
NO.
AMOUNT
FEE NO.
433
6(d)
Ventilation work permit 3. Domestic type kitchen or
bathroom exhaust system
Each system when vented
individually in single
$5.00
or multiple dwellings
44:6 799 15d -5
Each additional system
5.00 15d -5a.
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its
passage and publication.
First Reading:
Second Reading: ,-
ATTEST: ' Mayor
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash:
Demand Deposits
Working Fund
Contracts Receivable
Loan To Other Funds
Inventory:
Liquor
Wine
Beer and Mix
Prepaid Expenses:
Unexpired Insurance
Supplies
LIQUOR FUND
BALANCE SHEET
CITY OF EDINA
As At October 31, 1984
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
FIXED ASSETS:
Land
Land Improvements
Buildings
Furniture and Fixtures
Leasehold Improvements
Less: Allowance for Depreciation
and Amortization
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Trade Accounts Payable
Accrued Payroll
SURPLUS:
Invested in Fixed Assets
Unappropriated
$ 22,979.83
729,769.27
306,735.14
3,035.55
$1,062,519.79
467.361.38
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS
$ 222,659.42
3,800.00
$ 364,271.99
275,676.27
75,290.92
$ 226,459.42
39,786.69
415,000.00
715,239.18
$ 13,778.30
400.00 14,178..30
$1,410,663.59
$ 233,784.60
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
595,158.41
828,943.01
2,239,606.60
$ 152,669.69
13,472.28
$ 166,141.97
$ 828,943.01
1,244,521.62 2,073,464.63
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS $21,239,606.60
SALES:
Liquor
Wine
Beer
Mix and Miscell
Less bottle refunds
NET SALES
COST OF SALES:
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF INCOME AND EXPENSE
CITY OF EDINA
Ten Months Ending October 31, 1984 and October 31, 1983
INCREASE
19R4 1983 DECREASE* _
50th Street Yorkdale - Grandview Total 50th Street Yorkdale Grandview Total
$ 420,828.05
260,121.46
207,149.92
Is 13,584.58
901,684.01
$ 866,100.07
489,600.43
403,322.53
31,448.34
$1,790,471.37
21.790.98 541,157.45
879,893.03 $1,736,313.92
$ 794,155.77
419,716.10
361,566.31
28.509.88
$1,603,948.06
$2,081,083.89 $461,468.41
1,169,437.99 270,341.50
972,038.76 216,703.24
73,542.80 14,021:9.3
$4,296,103.44 $962,535.08
50,789.11 126,737.54 24,645.11
$1,553,158.95 $4,169,365.90 $937,889.97
Inventory -January 1 175,604.42
289,642.25
237,950.02
703,196.69
Purchases 761,378.04
1,382,186.84
' 1,237,220.84
3,380,785.77
$ .936,982.46
$1,671,829.14
$1,475,170.86
$4,083,982.46
Inventory OCT-31 217,400.94
273,187.27
224,650.97
715,239.18
$ 719.581.52
$1,398,641.87
$1,250.519.89
$3,368,743.28
209,893.84
753.421.42
$963,315,26
186,368.28
$776.946.98
$ 926,484.74 $ 824,363.76
504,759.34 425,675.44
404,389.56 351,440.75
31,253.92 289865.79
$1,866,887.56 $1,630,345.74
$2,212,316.91 $131,233.02*
1,200,776.28 31,338.29*
972,533.55 494.79*
74,141.64 598.84*
$4,459,768.38 $163,664.94*
53,549.38 55,070.18 133,264.67
1,813,338.18 $1,575,275.56 $4,326,503.71
6,527.13*
157,137.81*
303,342.64
256,136.67
769,373.15
66.176.46*
1, 465, 837.91
`13,276,159.83
3,495,419.16
114,633.39*
$1,769,180.55
$1,532,296.50
$4,264,792.31
$180,809.85*
253,975.06
213,439.66
653,783.00
61,456.18
$1.515.205.49
$1, 318 ,856.84
$3,611 1 009.31
$242,266.03*
GROSS PRO F11$
160,311.51
$ 337,672.05
$ 302,639.06
$ 800,622.62
$160,942.99
$ 298,132.69
$ 256,418.72
$ 715,494.40
$ 85,128.22
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Selling
56,612.49
101,052.64
80,532.77
238,197.90
55,586.76
102,063.80.
87,183.41
244,833.97
6,636.07*
Overhead
33,646.36
45,731.43
36,925.77
115,403,56
30,273.49
47,693.78
36,764.27
114,731.54
672.02
Administrative
65,892 96
83,165 66
69,826 85
218,885 47
59,520.40
79,700.86
62,746.2.7
201,967.53
16,917.94
TOTAL OPER ATIN q
156,151 81
$ 229,949 73
$ 186,385 39
$ 572,486 93
$145,380.65
$ 229,458.44
$ 186,693.95
$ 561,533.04
$ 10,953.89
EXPENSES
NET OPE RATING $
4,159.70
$ 107,722.32
$ 116,253.67
$ 228,135.69
$ 15,562.34
$ 68,674.25
$ 69,724.77
$ 153,961.36
$ 74,174.33
PROFIT
OTHER INCOME:
Cash Discount
10,627.75
18,563.70
16,453.76
45,645.21
10,785.14
21,263.44
18,462.58
50,511.16
4,865.95*
Cash over or under
2.34*
213.61*
39.16
176.79*
66.79*
539.48*
138.66
467.61*
290.82
Income on investments
Other
-0-
983.85
1,300.25
780.85
-0-
3,064.95
-0 -.
751.58
577.31
480.22
-0-
1,809.11
-0-
1,255.84
$
11,609 26 $
19,650 34
$ 17,273 77
$ 48,533.37 $
11,469.93
$ 21,301.27 $
19,081.40 $
51,852.66
$ 3,319.29*
NET INCOME $
' 15 768.96 $
127 372.66
$ 133 527.44
$ 276,669.06 $
27,032.27
$ 89,975.52 $
88,806.23 $
205,814.02
$ 70,855.04
PERCENT TO NET SALES:
Gross profit
Operating expenses"
Operating profit
Other income
NET INCOME
18.22%
19.44%
19.48%
19.20%
17:16%
16.44%
16.28%
16.54%
17.75
13.24
12.00
13.73
15.50
12.65
11.85
12.98
6.20%
7.48%
'5.47%
1.66%
3.79%
4.43%
3.56 % -
1.32
1.13
1.11
1.16
1.22
1.17
1.21
1.20
1.79%
7.33% 8.59% 6.63% " -g% 4.96% 5.64% 4.76%
r
A.
1933 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK N0.
DATE
AMOUNT
00.2067
U1/16/85
897.75
OJ2067
J1/16185
11.25
UJ2U67
01/16/85
1,070.92
UU2067
01/16/85
14.43
JU2067
01/16/85
•90
002067
U1/16/85
29.9$
,
e
OJ21 29 O1 /16/85
00.2129 0'1/16/85
* ** * **
002135
01/16/85
0U.21 35
0.1/16/85
OU.21 35
0.1/16185
002135
01/16/85
372135
01/16/85
002135
C1/16/85
002135
01/16185
00.2135
i1 /16 185
**. * **
2,325.20 •
6,897.1 5
6,019.70
12,915.85 •
.57-
14.74 -
1.46
2.55-
28.40
736.98
72.78
- 127.65
946.49 •
* ** -CKS
50.3710- 822 -82.
MANUAL
- -
- 5)- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
01 -21 -85 PAGE 1
MANUAL
CHECK REGISTER
MANUAL
_.
50 -4628- 822 -82
V =NDO1,
ITEM_ DESCRIPTION,-_,-_-
_._- _..- .A000UNT,.NO._.INV.
-p. P.O. p_ MESSAGE .
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
CAPITAL
CITY
_
DISTRI
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
CAPITAL
CITY
_
DISTRI
-� 50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
U.1/16/85
304.50
E)
- - - - - -- - -
* ** -CKS
002138
J.1/16185
298.41 -
4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
BELL30In
00.2139
01/16/85
_50- .
50.4626- 862 -86
- -_._-
MANUAL
BELL3Of'
50 -4628- 842 -84
OU2138
u1/16/85
815.50
* ** -CKS
50.3710- 822 -82.
MANUAL
- -
- 5)- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86 _
MANUAL
_.
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86 _.
MANUAL
- --- - - - - -- -
MANUAL
EAGL=
WIN=
_ 6.3.9- -
EAGL=
._.
YIN_
_..- - - - --
50 -3710- 842 -84
EAGLE
WIN--
1.7)_
EAGL:
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
EAGLE
_.
W -IN.
_.
EAGLE
WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
EAGLE
U ?N:
17.73-
-EAGLE
- -- - -- .
WINE
- _ ___. _ 50 -4628 862 86
50 3710 - 822 -82
0021 38
U1 /16/85
_ 6.3.9- -
- E)
PH!LLIP3
_..- - - - --
50 -3710- 842 -84
002138
01/16/85
1.7)_
�0
PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
002138
0.1/16/85
16.33-
ED
PiILLID,S
50- 3710- 842 -84
GJ.2138
U1/16/85
17.73-
E)
PHILLIPtS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
OU2138
u.1/16/85
25.08-
E)
PiILLI'S
50- 3710 - 862 -86
072138
U1/16/85
4.89-
ED
PiILLI *,S
50 -4626- 842 -84
002138
U1/16/85
-- 1,254.15
E)
PHILLIP'S "._.
__ _ __.___.___. ..____.
50- 4628 - 822 -82
OU2138
U.1/16/85
304.50
E)
PiILLIDIS
,.
50- 4628- 922 -82
002138
J.1/16185
298.41 -
ED
PHILLIaS
50- 4628- 822 -82
00.2139
01/16/85
298.41
ED
PHILLIPS
50 -4628- 842 -84
OU2138
u1/16/85
815.50
E)
PH ILLIP'S
50- 4628- 842 -84
00.2138
0.1/16/85
85.'00
ED
PHILLIaS
50- 4628- 842 -84
002138
01/16/85
886.25
E)
PHILLIPS
_ _ _. _.. -. -...__ _ . - - -.- 50- 4628- 862 -86-
002138
01/16f85
244.50
ED
PHILLIPS
1,223.50
CRIGGS
COJoER
3,519.).8
* ** -CKS
-MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL _
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
# # * *s•
_.
-
- - -__.-
• *.-CKS
002190,
01/16/85
17.91 -___-
- •___GRIGGS-
COOPER
AND
C_ -_.._.
50- 3710 - 822 -82 _ -__ -_
50 -3710- 842 -84
__ MANUAL
MANUAL
JJ2190
Ll /16fFS
102. °2 -
GRIGSS
COOPER
AN)
C
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
U,,21 On
01/16/A5
33.18-
GRIG3S
CO•)PER
AN)
C
57- 3710- 362 -86
MANUAL
;:0.219[.
u1/16/85
30.9,-
G*IG3S
COOPER
AND
C
5 ,)- 3710 - 362 -86
MAWU'L
0.,21 9^_•.
L1 /16185
24.47-
G? IGGS
CO-'DER
AN)
C
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
7 L�121 00
61/16/85
998.33
GRIG;S
COOPER
AND
C
5J- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
00.2190
0,1/16/85 -
1,659.810
- - - -- - - __ -- --
- - -- GRIGSS
CO] ER
- ^-
A140
---
C ____-- --------
- -- - - --
-------- - - - -50- 4526 - 842 -84
-
MANUAL
01.21 90
J1 /16 85
5,140.84
,,
GRIGGS
o
C00 -ER
AN)
C
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
Ju2190
J1/16I95
1,223.50
CRIGGS
COJoER
AP13
1985 CITY
0= CD!N;,
CHr=CK REGIST =R
01 -21 -85 PAGE 2
CHECK N'?.
DATE
AMOUNT. _
-_ VcV00?- _-
__, -- ,_..ITFM,_DESCRIP.T-ION._.
-__
-- ___ACCOUNT NO. .174V.
p P.O. -4 M_37AG'-
U0219' ?,
X1/16/85
1v544.92
GRIG3S CO)PER AN?
50- 4626- .362 -86
MANUAL
c
1?v257.�5 f
......
'
••• -CKS
4
liu2!98
(1/14/85
6 13 ^.49
,R ;U' H =ALTH
EMPLOYERS HOSP
10- 4156- 510 -51
MANUAL ,
6,130.49 f
111111
a**-CKS
(;02271
01/16/85
7.96-
INTEIC04TINENTAL
PK _
_
- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
002271
01/16/85
10.71-
I4TEIC04TINENTAL
PK
_ -50-
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
002271
01/16/85
5.63-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
�
002271
01/16/85
83.63-
INTEIC04TINENTAL
PK
_
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
UU2211
01/16/85
16.50
INTEICONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
DJ2271
U1/16/85
535.70
I4TERCJNT*_NENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
r
002271
01/16/85
_ — 49181.98 _
INTEtC04TINENTAL
PK
___ ___
_ 50- 4626- 842 -84 _
MANUAL
10.2271
3.1/16195
59.25-
T4TEtCJ4TINE4TAL
PC
50-4626-842-84 50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
OJ2271
71/16/85
398.28
I`JTS1CONTINENT4L
PK
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
w
002271
01/16/85
_ __- 3.90
INTE2CONTINENTAL
PK _
_50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
002271
01/16185
291.56
INT_tCOVTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
3j2271
0.1/16/85
1.50
IITEACONTINE4TAL
PK
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
4
--
---- - - -5.� 262.04.-.*
- -
lkffff
• *• -CKS
�
Dj,2285
U1/16/85
4.24-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
UU2285
01016/85
.C8
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
00,2285
01/16/85
3976-
_ JOHNSOV WINE -. _.._.
__...._ _
---.-------------50-3710-842-84
MANUAL
:,0.2285
01/16/85
8.46-
JOHNSOV WINE
_
5D- 3710 - 842 -84
_ _
MANUAL
D 002285
01/16/85
. ^9
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
4
002235
01/16/85
_ -_ .08
JOHNSOV WINE
- 50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
OJ2285
!'1/16/85
423.45
JOHNSON WINE
_
50 -4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
Ou2285
01/16/85
1.80
J)HNSOV WINE
50 -4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
002285
01/16/85
-- - 2.10
JOHNSOV WINE
-
- — - - -- - - -- - -
-: 50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
30,2255
0.1/16/85
212.15
JOHNSON WIVE
50- 4628- 822 -82
_
MANUAL
UJ2285
01/16/85
1.80
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
OU2285
0.1/16/85
_ 181618
_ JOHNSON WINE
_
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
OU.2295
01/16/85
4.15-
JOHNSON WINE
__— _
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
00,2285
01/16/85
4.98-
JOHNSOV WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
00.2285
01/16/85
_ _. 4.15-
_.JOHNSON WINE
_- 50- 4628 -- 862 -86
MANUAL
799.99 •
t
b
fff ff f
+ +• -CKS
OU2415
01/14/85
69324.85
MED CENTER
MEP HOSP
10 -4156- 510 -51
MANUAL r ,'
v
- - - --
----- - - --.6. *.324. R 5 '-
- -- - -- - - -
1 f f f f f f
* ** -CKS
w
002433
01/16/85
1 0
PAUSTIS 8 SOVS
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
+ 002433
01/16/85
77.28
PAUSTIS & SONS
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
ok
- - - ---------
- --- -- 78.96._ •
_� ---
f f • • . •
-
+ ** -CKS
li
� r -
1985;C►..
OF EDINA
CiMECK REGISTER
01 -21 -85 PAGE 3
CHECK NO.
DATE -
_ _- AMOUNT
^_ V =NDOt _
_ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT _N0. - INV._U
P.O._0_MESSAGE - -.
002442
0.1/14/85
129997.42
- PHP
EMP.NOSPITALIZATION__. -_-
10-,41.56-5.10-51
MANUAL y `'
129887.42 *
# # #rff
OU.2451
0.1/16185
5.31 -.
OJALITr WIVE
5D- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
002451
0.1/16/85
- - - 1.17
_ QUALITr1 WINE _
50- 3710 - 842- 84
MANUAL
002451
0.1 / 16 /85
6.40.
OUeLI Tr VINE
-
50- 3710 - 842 -84
_ -_- - -
MANUAL
00,2451
[1/16185
2.10•
OUALITV W INE
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
002451
u1/16/85
- B.57- _
QUALITY WINE _ _
-
3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
OQ2451
0.1/16/85
1.61
QUALITrl WINE
_ -_ - _
-50-
50-3710-862-86---------
MANUAL
00.2451
0.1/16/85
1015-
QUALITY WIN_
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
002451
01/16/85
_ .51 -_
_ QUALITr' WINE __-
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
00,2451
D.1 /16/85
951
_. _
QUALITY, WIVE
-_
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
CO2451
01/16/85
.51
QUALITY WINE
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
00.2451
01/16/85
-- - - -T 55.00-
-
0JALITr1 WIVE - _ - --
- -
4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
002451
01/16185
265.75
QUALITII WINE
-_50-
50 -4628- 822 -82
_ - -- MANUAL
CU2451
01/16/85
105000
OUALITr' WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
002451
4.1116185
428.65
- -- -
QUALITY WINE - - -
- _ ..-._ _------------.--
50- 4628- 842 -84
_
MANUAL-
00.2451
G.1/16185
320.10
OJALITr WIVE
- - -- --
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
002451
01/16/85
25.30
QJALITV VINE
50- 4628- $62 -86
MANUAL
002451
01/16/85
_ _ 25.81-
- OUALITY WINE_ _ _.
4628 - 862 -86
002451
01/16/85
57.84
QUALITr'WINE
_ -__50-
_
50- 4628- 862 -86
_.- .___..MANUAL -
MANUAL
OC,2451
0.1/16185
8[.54-
QUALITY WIPE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
002451
0.1/16/85
- - _ 25.30_-
OUALITr_ MINE• • • - - _
- -- - - - - -- - -- --
504628- 862 -86
MANUAL
995.48 •
- --
_- _ _-
KS
00,2540
01/16/85
5.25-
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
002540
^1/16/85 _
-----262 . F0 _
_ TWIN CITY WINE ,- -.. ___ _•
_______ ________
4628 - 842.84.___.
,
MANUAL
UD2540
U1/16/85
3.03
TWIN CITY WINE
__
_ -
__50-
50- 4628 - 842 -84
-_.
MANUAL
263.55 #
_
- -
r+f -CKS
0 0.9'5 22
0.1/14/85
- -- - -- 89163.92
_ AMOCO. ,OIL
- - -- -
GASOLINE
--
10 -4612- 560- 56-
MANUAL'
89163.92 •
- __.___
00.8716
01/14/85
300 .?0
U S POSTM &STER
POSTAGE DUE
10- 4290 - 510 -51
MANUAL .
300.70 +
# # # # ##
f+f -CKS
017091
01/14/85
1�500.OD-
CITY OF E0I'NA T
TRANSFER
- --
10 -1139- 000 -00
- --
MANUAL-
19500.00 +
rrr -CKS
0110.15 -
_ 0.1 /14/85_ -
-.- 13.37 _
-
- -AT_. B . T _ _TELEPHONE
-
1.0- 20,10- 000 -00
MANUAL
011015
0.1/14/8'.
92.02
AT 9 T
TELEPHONE
20- 2010- 000 -00
_ - -_
MANUAL
011015
01/14/85
44.93
AT R T
TELEPHONE
23- 2010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
909000000
1ST SOUTH]ALE
CHECK
REGISTER
50- 1010 - 000 -00
01 -21 -85 PAGE 4
CHECK NO.
DA TE _
___ _ AMOUNT _
__. _
VENDOR_._ _
...-.---.ITEM DESCRIPTION.._.,__
- _ACCOUNT.. NO*.- I NV.._.1f
_P *0. M MESSAGE
011:'.15
01/14/85
64.78
AT R
T
TELEPHONE
27- 2010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
•.. * **
214.40
* ** -CKS
* * * * *•
01/14/85
19695.68
MI NNE G A'S C0
HEAT
10- 2010- 000 -00
•** -CKS
U11018
01/14/85
13.05
A T
S p
TELEPHONE
10- 2010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
011018
01/14/85
4.50
A T
i T
TELEPHONE
20- 2010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
111018
01/14/85
21.74
A T
& F
TELEPHONE
28- 2010 - 000 -00
MANUAL'
011354
01/14/85
39.29
_MINV= GA'SSCOw__
-__ _, . __._
_HEAT
MANUAL
* ** * ** -- - -- - -- *** -CKS
011114
01/14/85
909000000
1ST SOUTH]ALE
BANK TRANSFER
50- 1010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
011174
01/14/85
_.. 909000.33-
1ST SOUTHDALE_
-.BANK TRANSFER._5Q
-1010- 000 -00
MANUAL '
.00 •
•.. * **
* ** -CKS
011354
01/14/85
19695.68
MI NNE G A'S C0
HEAT
10- 2010- 000 -00
MANUAL
011354
01/14/85
_ 1343.97
MINNEGASCO -_
__.
HEAT- _
10 -2010- 000 -00
MANUAL
011354
01/14185
39203.89
MINN_GASCO
HEAT
10- 2010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
011354
^.1/14/85
89353.15
MINYEGASCO
HEAT
10- 2010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
011354
01/14/85
19925.87_.__
_MINV= GA'SSCOw__
-__ _, . __._
_HEAT
MANUAL
0,11354
01/14185
22.13
MILAN= GXSS:O
HEAT
20 -2010- 000 -00
MANUAL
011354
0.1114/85
297.16
MINN_GASCO
HEAT
23- 2010- 000 -00
MANUAL
011354
0.1/14/85
_ 3.)) _
MINYEGASCC
HEAT _ ------- __ _ ___
26- 2010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
U11354
01/14/85
201.16
MILAN= GASS :O
HEAT
27- 2010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
011354
1/14/85
797.15
MINNEGASSCO
HEAT
27- 2010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
011 354
01/14/85 , ..
5 9909.1 7__ _ _._
_ MINNEGA SCO
- _ _ -_
. _ HEAT _-
28 -2010- 000 -00 ..._
MANUAL
0,11354
C.1/14/85
3,34509
MINN_GECSCO
HEAT
30- 2010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
011354
01/14/85
333.55
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
40- 2010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
011 354
01/14/85
_ .__ _ 356.80 _
MINV =GCSCO .
HEAT - _-
_ _ 50- 2010 - 000 -00 _
MANUAL
011354
01/14/85
382.22
MIN4EGASC9
HEAT
50- 2010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
011354
01/14/85
405.59
MINVEGASCO
MEAT
50- 2010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
___ _ __28576.4 -9_•
_ -_
•.* * *•
* ** -CKS
011396
01/14/85
54.05
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
TELEPHONE
10- 2010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
011396
)1/14/85
92.20
NORTiW_ST_IN
BELL
HEAT
10 -2010- 000 -00
MANUAL
011 396
U1/14/85
_.3,185.92
NORT14EST_RN
BELL
TELEPHONE_
_ 10- 2010 - 000 -00 _._
MANUAL
011396
U1/14/85
60.25
NORTHWEST ERN
BELL
TELEPHONE
10- 2010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
011396
1/14/85
19.45
NORTiW_ST_RN
BELL
TELEPHONE
20- 2010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
011 396
01/14/85
._1,475.23
NTO PT-1 WEST_RN
BELL
TELEPHONE -_
_ _ 20- 2010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
011396
]1/14/85
131.37
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
TELEPHONE
23 -2010- 000 -00
MANUAL
011396
01/14/85
12.75
N ?RT4JEST_RN
BELL
TELEPHONE
26- 2010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
011 396
01/14/85 _. _
__ __ „__333.90 __-
NORTHWEST--RN
BELL
__- TELEPHONE _________-
___27- 2010- 000 -00 _
MANUAL
U11396
01/14/85
335.57
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
TELEPHONE
28- 2010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
011396
01/14/85
46.98
NORTiAEST_2N
BELL
TELEPHONE
29- 2010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
011396
01 /14 /85
210.30
N'IRTHWEST_R N
BELL
TELEPHONE -._. __.. _._
._.. _ 30- 2010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
U11396
J1/14/85
96.30
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
HEAT
40- 2010- 000-00
MANUAL
0.11396
01/14/85
137.10
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
HEAT
50- 2010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
011396
01/14/85 _ _
_ 178.53
NORTHWESTERN
BE LL.- '
HE4T
50-2010-000-00
MANUAL
0.11396
?.1/14/85
128.37
NORT41WEST_.RN
SELL
HE4T
50- 2010 - 000 -00
MANUAL,
69504.17 •
e
1985 :Cl
J- EDINA
CHECK RL,.oTER
01 -21 -85 PAGE 5
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
ITEM -DESCRIPTION,----.--
ACCOUNT N0._ INV.
O.P.O._#- MESSAGE
**t -CKS
011430.
0.1/14/85
12,740.28
PERA
EMP PERA CCNT
10- 4145 - 510 -51
MANUAL,
129740.28 *
* ** -CKS
011523
01/14/85
59034.87
SOCI %L SECURITY
EMP FICA CONT
10- 4149 - 510 -51
MANUAL.
59034.37 *
* ** -CKS
U21 UO3
:,1 / ^8 /85
13.11
ALBINS34
BLUE PRINTING
10- 2010 - 000 -00
021003
01108/85
296.45
ALSINSON
BLUE PRINTING
10- 2010 - 000 -00
U21103
01/08/85
26.50
ALBINSON
GEV SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
336.05 +
021304
CA /11/85
10.45
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
10- 2010 - 000 -00
02170.4
01/11/85
121.95
AMT RICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
10- 2010 - 000 -00
LIZ 100.4
0.1/11/85
198.36
AMERI :V1 -INEN
LAUNDRY
10- 2010- 000 -00
U21U04
C.1 /11/85
11.30
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
20 -2010- 000 -00
U219Q4
0.1/11/85
47.52
AMERICAN -INEN
LAJNDRY -. _._ -.
50 -2010- 000 -00
U21J0.4
(i1/11/85
46.10
AMERICAN LINE!
LAUNDRY
50- 2010 - 000 -00
021:,14
01/11/85
63.93
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
50- 2010 - 000 -00
499.61
* ** -CKS
021007
01/08/85
22.00
APEX PEST CONTROL
GEN SUPPLIES
28 -2010- 000 -00
22.00
02130.8
U1/10/85
93.13
KAMAN BEA2ING & SPLF
PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
U21UC8
J1/10/85
49.00
KAMAN B =ACING & SPLY
REPAIR PARTS
27- 2010 - 000 -00
142.13 •
* ** -CKS
021)13
01/10./85
75.70
ALTERNATOI REBUILD
REPAIR PARATS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
021013
U1 /10/85
46.65
ALTE1N41T03 REBUILD
REPAIR PARATS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
121.65 •
.r....
* ** -CKS
021015
J1 /0.8/85
72.70
AT & T IN=O SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
10- 2010 - 000 -00
72.00 +
t.If1.
* ** -CKS
021020
C1 /10/85
93.40
AIR iYDRAULIC SYSTEM
REPAIR.PARTS _
10- 2010 - 000 -00
93.40 •
r.►frf
* ** -CKS
021924
01/08/85
9.75
ARTISTAT INC
PRINTING
23- 2010 - 000 -00
^
"
1935 czTv
o= cozmx
cuccn ncsznrsn
01~21~85 pxsc u
m
CHEC K NO*.uATE-.
���������S-C.RI.PTI-LN___
�C-QU -Oo-tt
AEsoxGE '
�
p°ro °
~
°°°~Cxm
�
*
� 021028 _
01/10/85
33.6
oEcn-wxoL_rnuLcnS _
mwcm�na
27-.2o1V~0Vo~00_____________
021 J 2
ul /,u,on
1,727.9D
aEcn u*oL--oxLcao
xmncmrnnn
so~oOvu~ouU~on
ip 02,u29
0.1/10v85
39893.50
uccn wwoLEmxLces
zwxcmToav
50~2010~000~00
�
uavuao
_01/11/85
2,466.90 ---_---OccR_uom������um'--'_'-
_-zm��mTo��
--5V-2]�|0.0QU~oo--_--__-
-
8,121.95 °
*
°
-°°"cmS
, noousn
n`vnoxos
50.55
ocnmrnnn rmuonzms
zmwcmroRY
50~*626~822~82
~
021 J33
u1v15/85
36°19______acmmrono
rmucnzms
zwwcm7onv_5n_46o6~moo~oa__
pc,uon
21/15/85
8100
ocmGrupo rowcnzms
zmwcm7onv
50 4626-842-84
* 021 U33
ov/ouvun
osm°vs
osnn`nao raucnIww
rwvcmTonv
nm~*eaa~o4o~m*
^
0e1333
_ulv15x85
4°s3.ncnaFVno_
TRUCKING
INVENTORY
5V-46o6~ma2~ma_____
uavnso
u,/nnxxn
334.95
acas--unm 7nucmzms
zmwsmvmmv
50~4626~862~86
w
6**.25 ^
^
*
°^^~ons
v
w
VzIgou_-_
4.1 /15/85
IUJ.00
dQIL]ER--_---___-'
1on°un °
»
*
°°°~cxo
m nu1 353
�
ommvf8 5
39.64
BnnwwIm3 "-mnzo
ncrumc CoLuccrzom
10~2010~000~00
w
nzoonn
01111f85
96 961________8mnwm1la-!cwnzs_________Rc'usE_c-PLLcICIzom---____10-2010~000~00
________-__
U21 053
0.1/11/85
sa°oa
oxowxzxG Fsnnzo
mcpuoc CoLmccrzom
10~2010~000~00
n ucxa.5s
ulm1r85
96.61
emnwxzws rEnRzn
ncpusc CwLLccrzow
10~2010~030~00
.
*
021053
01x11v85
7-o.oVBROWNING
rcnnzm
REFUSE J:mLLccr ION _-___'2V~2ovo~oo0~0o____
navmoy
61/11x85
.vr
uxowvz#s rcnnzy
ncrumc CnLmccTznw
20~2010~000~00
v 0.211.53
01m1/85
*°ra
nxouvzqn rEnnzo
ncruoc cpLLccrzmm
23~2010~000~00
*
021353
����`/o�oo.*menouxzws_�sxnz�
__ ___ncruac
cuLcEcT.zom______-27~2010~000~00
02105
01/11/85
19.26
oxywmTNu rsanzs
mcrwac coLcccrznm
_______
27~20lo~oma~oo
w 021353
01x11/85
134.33
onnwxznG TEmxIs
mcFuoE cmLLccrsmm
23~2010~030~00
*
ouvoos
a�vv1xns
_ so�.uV ____ennwnzVo_FE
- nzo _-_---__RE�uSc-CALLccJ%qm--__-_nnr2A1o~ooU~no___
. no�uny
��,vxmn
0.1111f85
285°64
enouwzms rcnnzu
acrwwc COLLECTION
_
50~2010~000~00
m
x,xsr.n« °
*
°°°~cxo
�
w
021058
01/151e5
-_- 1oo.00wwvm�-��moc�r
_-_ -
PnLJCc_oc»wxcs_-S_-_-_'_-�xD_�A_toV~42_0~42____-__
vOo.00 ^
'
w
--_-_'----___-__'_-___----°°°~Cno
� 021013
0111Iv85
18.n5
cIrr mccn
Imwcmrnnn
50~2010~000~00
m
ozvJry
91v10x9 5
_____nz.vm_ _
_CITY acsn__'_'______-'-zwxcw
TORY
50-2010~000~00
oz,nrs
01v15v85
15°25
Cl TV oDcn
xmvcmrOwv
_____
50~2010~000~00
» �
67.00 °
m
^ u21014 ---
--01/10v-
CITY -OF-860nMINiTom------KEVjE[_SER
10-000-00------'--'---'---
-- --
221°00
�
1985 1, C.
OF EDINA
HECK Rt-_.$TER
01 -21 -85 PAGE 7
r '
CHIECK
N0. DATE
AMOUNT
VEVDOU
ITEM _DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT .NO. - ,INN.-
11__P.O. A. MESSAGE
021075
01/16/85
4.30
CLANCY JRJG INC
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010- 060 -00
021775
01/16/85
4.45
CLANCY DRJG INC
_
PHOTO SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
021C75
7.1/16/85
5 *38
CLANCY -3 R'JG INC
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010- 000 -00
U21075
01/16185
28 *49
CLANCY DQJG INC
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -2010- 000 -00
021075
01/16/85
14.48
CLANCY DRUG INC
_
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
57.09
* ** -CKS
UZ1078
01/11/85
484.75
COCA C3LA BOTTLING
CONCESSIONS
28- 2010 - 000 -00
021078
01/11/85
378.40
COCA COLA BOTTLING
INVENTORY
_ _
50- 2010 - 000 -00
U21078
J1/10/85
778.25
COCA COLA BOTTLING
INVENTORY
50- 2010 - 000 -00
L'21018
J1/15/85
256 *60
COCA COLA 30TTLING
INVENTORY
50- 2010- 000 -00
1.898.00 •
'
-- -
-
* +* -CKS
021082
0.1/15/85
31.75
CONVAl FIRE 8 SAFETY
EQUIP MAINT
10 -2010- 000 -00
31.75 *
rR••fr
* ** -CKS
021087
0.1/10/85
657945
CUATIV MATH SCI
LAB EQUIP _ -
10- 2010 - 000 -00
U21087
J- 1106/85
49.32
CJRTIN MATH SCI
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
021087
01/10185
224.52
CURTIN MATH SCI
GEV SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
U21U87
U- 1/10/85
45.20
CURTIN MATH SCI
GEV SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 482 -48
976.49
* ** -CKS
021)90,
01/10/85
29.99
CERT POYE1 TRAIN
REPAIR PARTS
10 -2010- 000 -00
021090
U1/10185
235. ?4
C=RT POWER TRAIN
REPAIR PARATS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
021J90
01/10/85
531 *75
CERT POWER TRAIN
REPAIR PARATS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
021)90,
01/10185
235.84
CERT POWER TRAIN
REPAIR PARATS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
19033.43 +
-
rf• *r*
* ** -CKS
021094
0.1/0.8/85
145.00
CAST REGISTER SALES
GEN SUPPLIES
23 -4504- 611 -61
145.00 *
rR••rR
* * +- CKS
U21097
01/11/85
50.00
COURTN =Y WAYNE
REGISTRATION
10- 4202 - 140 -14
5 ^.00.
rt•rrr
* ** -CKS
0211 ?.6
01/15/85
100.00
DAHL- MR_.41ILOING
POLICE SERVICES,
10- 4100 - 420 -42
100.00 *
"
*•r *r*
021117.
u1/16/85
645.70
OAVI)SEV DT!ST INC
INVENTORY
50- 2010- 000 -00
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
01 -21 -85 PAGE 8
HECK NO.
DATE
-..AMOUNT
- .- VEND02 - -,_ _.ITEM.
DES.CRI,PTIQN_- __-
ACCQUNT -N0. INV.-
# P.O..# MESSAGE
U1111rl.
0.1/15/85
160.30
OAVI)SEN JI'ST INC
INVENTORY
50 -2010- 000 -00
806.00
•
fr +taf
+ +f -CKS
021125
0.1/78/85
243.05
MERIT EUPllLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
28 -2010- 000 -00
021125
01/15/85
253.41
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
28 -4512- 708 -70
021125
01/15/85
59.70
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES_
-__ 28- 4512 - 708 -70
556.15
•
• f f f f i
rrf -CKS
0.21130.
01/08/85
17.43
DUNE BUGGY SUPPLY
CONT REPAIRS
28- 2010 - 000 -00
17.40
•
021131
0.1 /11185
282.35
ASPLJND COFFEE
CONCESSIONS
28- 2010 - 000 -00
021 131
Cl/11/85 - _
_ 750.33
- . ASPLUND COFFEE __-
CONCESSIONS
28- 2010 - 000 -00
011131
0.1/11/85
354.45
ASPLJVO CJFFEE
CONCESSIONS
28- 2010 - 000 -00
021131
0.1/08/85
44.25
ASPL'JN)' CJFFEE
CONCESSINS
28- 2010 - 000 -00
19431 .39
•
+ ►* -CKS
021136
01/10/85
93.10
EARL F A'ND -RSEN
SIGNS E POST
10- 2010 - 000 -00
93.10
+
•••fff
- --
ff• -CKS
0.21139
0.1/0.8/85 _ -_
- __ -_477. P,2
_ EDIN4 ELECTRIC C9_ .. -- ..._CDNT
REPAIRS- _- _- -_
-28. .-201,0- 000 -00
477.82
--
f •. t••
- -- - --- - - -`- - " ----`
-
+ff -CKS
021146
'1/08/85
29019.44
GREEV ACRES SPKL
CONT SERVICE
10- 2010 - 000 -00
29019.44
• - -_
+ftfi f
+ ++ -CKS
021148
01/10/85
27.61
ELVIV SAFETY SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -2010- 000 -00
27.61
•
ff +-CKS
021154
01/10/85
119.70
JOE ELIAS
HEALTH.COVERAGE _.
___10 -4156- 510 -51
119.70
.
• • • • f •
- ---- - - - - -- - - - -- --
- - - _ - -- -
- - - - --
..f -CKS
s
021156
01/10/85
31.10
FeIRVIEa IOSPITAL
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 2010 - 000 -00
rf f f f f
+ +* -CKS
021159
01/16/85
19355905
FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL C
GEN SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 801 -80
19955.35
•
t L
1985'CITY
0= E0INA
CHECK REGISTER
01 -21 -85 PAGE 9
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR _
ITEM DESCRIPTION
_- __ACCOUNT NO* INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
•r• +rr
* ** -CKS
U21133
:.1/C8/85
15.29
GIVEVS IN:
GEV SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 646 -64
15.29 +
r•►rr+
* *+-CKS
021194
x.1/10/85
87.95
GEN =IAL CIMMUNICATNS
CONT SERV
10- 2010- OOD -00
021194
U1/10185
19.70
GENEZAL COMMUNICATNS
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 301 -30
L21194
0.1/10/85
100.130
GENEZAL CJMMJNICATNS
RADIO SERV _-
10- 4294 - 420 -42
021194
01/15/85
377.50
GENEZAL COMMUNICATNS
RADIO SERV
10- 4294 - 440 -44
021194
U1/10/85
266.25
GENEZAL COMMUNICATNS
RADIO SERV
10- 4294 - 560 -56
843.70 +
99.99•
6**-CKS
021205
01 /10/85
353.70
G B K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
10- 2010 - 000 -00
U21236
U1/ ^13195
523.66
G B K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
10- 2010- 000 -00
U21206
J1/10185
44.00
G 8 K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
10 -2010- 000 -00
0-21205
31/08185
219.11.5
G B K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
10- 2010 - 000 -00
U21206
01/10/85
536.75
G 8 K SEPVICES
LAUNDRY
10- 2010 - 000 -00
U21 206
U 1 /C8 /8 5
35.20
G B K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
10- 2010- 000 -00
U.21206
01/10/85
252.75
G 8 K SERVICES
_ _ _ _- -
LAUNDRY
_
20- 2010 - 300 -00
021206
01/08/85
202.20
G R K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
20 -2010- 000 -00
L21206
71/10/85
116.50
G R K SEPVICES
LAUNDRY
30- 2010 - 000 -00
021206
.^.1/08/85
93.23
G 3 K SER /ICES
LAUNDRY
30 -2010- 000 -00
U212U6
01/08/85
80.53
G 8 K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
40- 2010 - 000 -00
021206
01110/85
136.30
G & K SERVICES
_LAUNDRY _
__40- 2010 - 000 -00
29703.54 r
021207
01/08/85
19359.75
GRIGGS BErl
INVENTORY
_- 50- 2010 - 000 -00
021277
U1/08/85
2,212.PD
GRIGGS 3E_R
INVENTORY
50- 2010 - 000 -00
021207
01/15/85
1,140.45
GRIGGS BE =R
INVENTORY
50- 2010 - 000 -00
49713.33 •.
r.rr*•
'
-
* ** -CKS
U21239
1,1/11/85
115.68
G =NU14E PURTS
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 2010- 000 -00
•
115.68 *
+•*r +r
.-
- --
- - - -- - _.
... __ .. - -
**-C KS
021213
01/C8/85
120.0 +0
L =ROY H LIBBY
CONT SERV
40- 2010 - 000 -00
021213
0.1/08/85
121.70
LEROY H LI38T
CONT SERV
40- 4200 - 800 -80
240.00 +
ff+*+r
* ►*-CKS
011228
01/15/85
233.70
HILLSTROM AUTO SJP Y
ROAD EQUIP
10- 2010 - 000 -00
011228
ul/15/85
23U.JU-
HILLSTROM AUTO SUP Y
CORRECTION
10 -2010- 000 -00
U212219
01/15185
29300.33
HILLSTROM AUTO SUP Y
R04D EQUIP
10 -2010- 000 -00
29300.10 +
*•fr•+
**r -CKS
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
C4EC K NO.
DATE
021234
'11/15/85
f r r 4 f f
021244
01/10185
021244
J1/10/85
021245
01/15/85
f i f i i f
021249
01/15/85
v
f r f f f i
U21 217
U21 219
U21 279
U21 2/9
021219
021279
UZ1219
021 219
021 219
C.21 219
021 279
OZ1 279
011 219
021 279
021 219
021 219
U21 279
U21 279
U21279
L21 279
021 2/9
021 279
021 279
U21 279
021 219
021279
U21279
',21219
f f f i i i
AMOUNT_- __ . _..
11.)0
11.00 i
20.05
59.1)
79.25 •
21.60
21.67 i
1oo.eo
100.90 •
CHECK REGISTER 01 -21 -85 PAGE 17
4EN00Ri_ ITEM DESCRIP..TION _. .. __.._.ACCOUNT N0. INV. -R P.O. # MESSAGE
HOOTE4 CLEANERS LAUNDRY _ 10- 2010 - 000 -00
MAYDEN
MU2DHY
REPAIR PARTS
10 -2010- 000 -00
HAYDEN
MURPIHY
REPAIR PARTS_
10- 2010 - 000 -00
ROBERT _8
-HILL
WILLIAM
H)FFMAN
POLICE SERVICES
10 -4100- 420 -42
U1/10/85
241.70
CARLSON PRINTING
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
241.70
J1/C18/85
15.29
JERRYS
= OD) S
PHOTO SUPPLIES
27- 2010 - 000 -00
15.29 •
1/10/85
54.28
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GE4 SUPPLIES
10 -2010- 000 -00
U1/10/85
2.45
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
01/10/85 -_.
_ _ . -_ __. 57.41 _.
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
_ GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00_
01/10/85
36.15
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 070 -00
)1 /1D/85
22.96
JTRRfi
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GE4 SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
L1/10/85
50.23
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES _
10- 2010 - 000 -00
01/10/85
4.50
J --RRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
0'1/10/85
17.36
J'RRrS
OUR
OWN
HO WE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
01110/85
21.18
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
110 WE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010- 000 -00
01/10/85
133.45
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
J1/10/85
57.48
JERRYS
OUR
0 W
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010- 000 -00
31 /10/85
13.52
J _-RRfS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -70
J1/10/85
103.31
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GE4 SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
01/10f85
92.35
JrRRfS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
61/10/85
66.05
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HO WE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
01/10/85
68923
JERRYS
OUR
OWN.
HOWE
_
REPAIR PARTS -
20 -2010- 000 -00
U1/10/85
123.34
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
PAINT
20- 2010 - 000 -00
1:1/10/85
60.38_
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES -_
20 -2010- 000 -00
?1/10/85
17.69
J-RRrS
OUR
OWN
Hr) WE
TOOLS
20- 2010 - 000 -00
J.1/10/85
7.89
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
PARTS
27- 2010 - 000 -00
01/10/85 _-
__16.17 __._JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
_TOOLS
27- 2010 - 000 -00..
01 /10 /85
14.15
J'RRfS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
TOOLS
28- 2010 - 000 -00
51/10/85
21.66
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
28 -2010- 000 -00
U1 /10 /85
141 .45
JERRf S
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES ._
- .. -. -_ 28- 2010 - 000 -00
01/10/85
13.64
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOW_
REPAIR PARTS
30- 2010 - 000 -00
J1/10/85
6.96
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HDWE.
GEN SUPPLIIES
40- 2010 - 000 -00
fii -CK
iii -CK3
iai -CKS
ir• -CKS
1935 C.
JF E7INA
CHECK
NO. DATE
021289
6.1/15/85
f f t r r f
OZ13J0
01/10/85
021300
01/15/85
ffffRr
021302
01/10/85
OZ13J,2
01/15/85
*rr*r•
U21 30.4
C 1 /15 /85
f r t t f r
OZ1311
01/15/85
021311
U1/08/85
021311
U.1/Q.8/85
*afrra
PRODUCTS
021313
•frraa
!?1/15/85
AMOUNT
107.3
100. ^0 *
598.)0
561.00
1 9159.11
5 9574.1 6
29891.21
89465.37 *
6.08
6.08 *
29574.25
3 9974.1 0
39635.30
101,184.65
281.45
281.45
CHECK RL
.TER
415.80
01 -21 -85 'AGE 11
V_ND02
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
p P.O. # MESSAGE
WALTER JOHNSON
POLICE SERV
10 -4100- 420 -42
+ * * -CK.S
K1KES1 ATILETIC
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 2010 - 000 -00
KOKES1 ATILETIC
GEN SUPPLIES _
28- 4504 - 708 -70
109.174
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
GEM SJPPLIES
* ** -CKS
KJETi =R DIST CO
INVENTORY
50- 2010 - 000 -00
LAWS014
KUETHER 0113T CO
INVENTORY
50- 2010 - 000 -00
0Z1 317
11/10/85
128.83
LAWS14
4 -CK_
KNOX LUMBER CO
GEN SUPPLIES
28 -4504- 708 -70
01110185
53 *00
LAWS34
PRODUCTS
*** -CKS
EASTSID: 3EVERAGE
INVENTORY
50- 2010 - 000 -00
453.05
EASTSIDE BEVERAGE
INVENTORY
50-2010- 000 -00
10 -2010- 000 -00
EASTSIDE 3EVERAGE
INVENTORY
50- 2010 - 000 -00
LAWS34
PRODUCTS
- - -
10- 2,010- 000 -00
**r -CKS
JOHN H FOSTER
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 801 -80
U21315
01/11/85
415.80
ANCHOR
PAPiER
PAPER SUPPLIES
10- 4514 - 520 -52
415.80
021317
0.1/10•/85
109.174
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
GEM SJPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
0.21317
u1 /10/85
773.24
LAWS014
PRODUCTS
SIGNS 8 POSTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
0Z1 317
11/10/85
128.83
LAWS14
PRODUCTS
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
021317
01110185
53 *00
LAWS34
PRODUCTS
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2710 - 000 -00
0.21 317
01 /10/85
453.05
LAWS34
PRODUCTS
SIGNS 6 POSTS
10 -2010- 000 -00
Del 311
U1/10/85
215.53
LAWS34
PRODUCTS
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2,010- 000 -00
19732.76
UZ1318
U1/16/85
85 *80
LEEF BROS
IN.
LAUNDRY
10- 2010 - 000 -00
021318
0.1/16/85
18.00
LEEF BR3S
*_NC
LAJNORY__..
27- 2010 - 000 -00
103.80 +
__._
rttfri
0,21324
01/16185
674.91
LIGIS
BILLIN6
10- 2010 - 000 -00
* **-CKS
**#-CKS
*** -CKS
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
01 -21 -85 PAGE 12
-
CHECK N0.
,DATE
A90UNT ___- _____
-__•_. _ V °4.D03
ITEM DESCRIPTION
AC- COUNT__N0._INV._.#_P.O.
# MESSAGE
021324
J.1/I6/$5
19116.36
LOGIS
BILLING
10- 2010- 000 -00
021 324
1.)1/16/85 -
647.35
LOGI3 -
_ .
BILLING _ _ -- -_
-_ - _ 10 -2010- 000 -00
021324
0.1/16/85
49000.00
LOGI3
BILLING
10 -2010- 000 -00
021324
01/16/85
19782.14
LOGIS
BILLING
10 -2010- 000 -00
011324
_ 0.1/16/85
_990.03
LDGI3- �-
_ ___-
__BILLING-
0.21324
0.1/16/85
29658.27
LOGIS
BILLING
10- 4200 - 500 -50
021324
01/16185
916.58
LOGIS
BILLING
30- 2010 - 000 -00
021 324
01/16/85
._ 916.57
-_ LOGIS _ __ -_
_
_ BILLING__. _ __ - -_
___40 -2010- 000 -00
021324
01/16/85
241.93
LOGIS
BILLING
50- 2010- 000 -00
021324
01/16/85
241.92
LOGI3
BILLING
59- 2010 - 000 -00
021324
01/16/85
241. 92 ,
-_. ._____L3GI.S
9ILLLNO
?0 -2010- 000 -00
149427.98
•
tr # #rr
021328
01/10/85
243.50
LAW ENFORCEMENT
CO
RADIO EQUIP
10- 2010- 000 -00
- - -
- -- - - -- 243- .50
- -' - -- -- - -- - - - -
-- - - - - --
- - - -- -
-
#.ff.f
# ## -CKS
021331
L'1/10/65
39647.00
LAHASS CORPORATION
CAPITOL OUTLAY
10 -2010- 000 -00
„
39647.00
* *• -CKS
r
021 337
U1 /10/85
-_ -__ - 26.58_
-_ -_. LAKE STATE'
EQUIP _ _
REPAIR PARATS
10- 2010 - 700 -00
021337
01/10/85
24.62
LAKE STATE
EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
021337
0.1/10/85
12.67
LAKE STATE
EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
0[1337 _. --
0.1/10/85___.
19.99_
_LAKE _STAT=
EQUIP_
REPAIR_PARATS
10 -2010- 000- 00_______
-_
021337
01/10/85
21.91
LAKE STAT=
EQUIPi
REPAIR PARATS
10 -2010- 000 -00
105.77
#
#ff #r #
-- - ---------
--- - - ---- ----------------
-
- - -- -- - -- -- - - --
- - - -. .. # ## -CKS
s
021 341 _
-. 01/10/85 --
__ - - -- _5].49
_ _M_ B -I INO_
SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES_
10 -2010- 000 -00
021341
0.1/10/85
50.4D
M B I 114D
SUPPLY
PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
;r
100.80
+
021342
u1/10/85
97.67
MAC 9'JEEN
_QUIP INC
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
011342
!].1/10/85
69.79
MAC 9U -EN
EQUIP INC
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010- 000 -00
021342
CJ /10/85
212.71- _.
- -_- _- MAC _0U "LYE N
EQUIP _INC
_- R_E?A�R
1_0- 2010- 000 -00
- -
379.47
•
y
#.►r ##
- --
### -CKS
Y
021344
0.1/15/85
16.12
MED OKYGEI
B EQUIP
EQUIP MAINT
10- 2010 - 000 -00
021344
_ -94.84
- __MED_DXKGEN
R__EOUIP
1ST-ATD SUPPLIES
10- 000 -00
021344
0.1/15/85
33.12
MED 1XM19E4
8 EQUIP
1ST AID SUPPLIES
-2010-
10- 2010- ODO -00
- _____
y,
144.08
•
#k ► #kf
---- -- ._- ,._.__.._ - -�
-_. -._. --
## #-CKS
__021_346_ -_
-•01 /10_/85
39786, 75
MET�J- Yp1SL`__.L -CDNM
_p- LpP_ PE�MiiS
10- 210- _Q00 -00
39786.75
*
'
_-
ti
• • f f f #
r.
b
01 -21 -85 PAGE 13
ITEM DES CRIPTI -ON ___ __A000UNT_.NO.- INV._# P -O- # MESSAGE
GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00
GEN SUPPLIES 30 -2010- 000 -00
GEN SUPPLIES 40- 2010- 000 -00
021359
01/15185
124.71
3M ALARM SERVICE
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
021358
ul/11185
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOt
ul/10185
0,21353
021353
021353
01/10/85
ul/10185
X1/10185
31.19
31.00
31.00
93.33 •
MINNESOTA
MINNESOTA
MINNESOTA
3LOVE
GLOV?
GLOVE
b
01 -21 -85 PAGE 13
ITEM DES CRIPTI -ON ___ __A000UNT_.NO.- INV._# P -O- # MESSAGE
GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00
GEN SUPPLIES 30 -2010- 000 -00
GEN SUPPLIES 40- 2010- 000 -00
* **• **
*** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
021359
01/15185
124.71
3M ALARM SERVICE
ALARM SERV
23- 4304 - 610 -61
28 -4304- 708 -70
021358
ul/11185
93.49
34 A.ARM SERVICE
ALARM SERVICE
ALARM SERV
50 -4304- 821 -82
021358
ul/10185
130.63
3M ALARM SERVICE
3M SERVICE
ALARM SERV
_
50- 4304 - 861 -86
021358
0.1/10/85
146.79
ALARM
495.53
021359
L "1/10185
16.94
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
10- 2010 - 000 -00
021359
01/10/85
9942
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
26.36 •
021 36)
01/10/85
25.50
MINNESOTA WANK =R
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
10 -2010- 000 -00
U21360
:1.1/10/85
114.00
MI NN =SO TA WANNER
C04T REPAIRS
REPAIR PARTS
40- 2010- 000 -00
021360
01/10/85
18.30
MINNESOTA WANNER
157.5]
*i iffi
021363
01/15/85
69.79
MONAICH MIRKING
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
50- 4516- 820 -82
50- 4516- 840 -84
011363
01/15/95
4.31
134.55
HONARCI MA-2KING
MONARCi'MERKING
..
OFFICE SUPPLIES
50 -4516- 840 -84
021363
:11/10/85
01/10/85
69.00
MONARCi MlRKING
OFFICE SUPPLIES
50 -4516- 860 -86
021 36 3
277.35
0.1115/85
100.033
BERT MERFELD
POLICE SERVICES
10- 4100- 420 -42
021365
109.90 *
021365
01/10/85
542.17
MINNESOTA BAR
INVENTORY
PAPER SUPPLIES
50- 2010 - 000 -00
59- 2010 - 300 -00
021366
01/15/85
51.7]
MINNESOTA BAR
3AR
INVENTORY
_ -,,__
50- 2010- 000-00
021366
j1 /11/85
336.92
MINNESOTA
979.99 •
•►: rf r
021370
01/08/85
306.95
MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO
- CONCESSIONS -_ _...
_ _.28 -2010- 000 -00-
306.95
021318
U1 /15/85
4,181.63.
MARK Vll SALES INC
INVENTORY
50- 2010 - 000 -00
50- 2010 - 900 -00
021379
61/08/85
335.00
MARK V11 SALES INC
V11 SALES INC
INVENTORY
INVENTORY
_._.
50- 2010- 000 -00
02131a
61/08/85
5,403.70
4,183.77
MARK
MARK V11 SALES INC
INVENTORY
50- 2010 - 000 -00
021378
61/11/85
149103.31.'
- -
* **• **
*** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1935 CITY
OF EDINA
CH_CK REGISTER
01 -21 -85 PAGE 14
~ C4ECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT -
_ V_ NOD R_ _
ITEM DESCRIPTION._ —_
-_- _ACCOUNT NO* INV.
_ R P.O. A MESSAGE
021380,
0.1/16/85
17,256.55
TNOMSEN NYBECK
S---1 LEGAL
10- 2010 - 000 -00
179256.55
** ** *r
* ** -CKS
021385
0.1/16/85
1 080.33
MCGUIRE 13BERf
TREE INSPECTION
10- 1300 - 011 -18
02138'5
121/16/85
243.0D
MCGUIREI 13BERT
TREE INSPECTION-
10- 4242 - 353 -30
[!21385
01/16/8`.
55000
MCGUIRE1 aOBERT
_
TREES PURCHASED
_
10- 4560- 643 -64
1.870.00
t * +t+r
*** -CK3
021368
0.1/10/85
16.0
YTL A'TOMIK MOTOR
PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
C21383
J1/10/85
.58
NTL 1;TJMI( MOTOR
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
16.58 +
+rrr+*
*** -CKS
021400
01/15/85
19614.60
NORTIRWESTEIN TIRE CO
TIRES. 8_- TUBES __-
10- 2010 - 000 -00
1y614.60
*** -CKS
021412
01/08/85
23.33
NN GRAPHIC SUPPLY
INVENTORY SUPPLIES
23- 2010 - 000 -00
20.31*
0.21413
01/11/85
365.90
NATIONYID_ PAPERS
PAPER SUPPLIES
10- 4514 - 520 -52
_365 .90
+*rrrr
* ** -CKS
U21417
01/10185
29335.30
OFFSET PRINTT'NG
PRINTING
10- 2010 - 000 -00
021417
U1/10/85
197905
r)FFS_T PRINTING
PRINTING
30- 4600- 780 -78
- _29232.05
•trtr*
* ** -CKS
021429
ul/11/85
166.25
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING.
CONCESSIONS
28- 2010 - 000 -00
021429
0.1/08/85
608.70
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
INVENTORY
50 -2010- 000 -00
OL1429
01/15/85
435+57
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
INVENTORY_
50- 2010- 000 -00
.
U21 42 9
0.1/08/85
189.00
PEPSI CJLA BOTTLING
_ _
INVENTORY
50- 2010 - 000 -00
19399.52
ttt*►*
- - -- - -
r** -CKS
021434
61/10/85 _
__ -_ - -17 .31 -
.- _PRINT =1S 37RVICE INC _._
=QUIP MAINT
2010 - 000- 00_____
♦
U21 43 4
01/10/85
340. ?0
PRINTERS SERVICE IVC
___28-
EQUIP MAINT
28- 4274 - 707 -70
-_.
510.:D
t*rrrr
- --- -
- - --
- - --- - -- - -- -- ----
- ---- - -- -
**► -CKS
011439
U1/C8/85 _
_— .__49450.63 ___-
_PRIOR_LAX_ AG__ -- -_ _ _
SANO.. GRAVEL- ROCK____10-
2010 - 000 -00
021439
0.1/08/85
19493.90
PRI02 LAKE AG
SAND GRAVEL ROCK
_
30- 2010 - 000 -00
r
59924.50 •
'
,,ice--- +..• -., � ..
. - � - - - .. _ ,_ _
..- - - ....- , ...... ,- . - . - - --
-� - -----
- - - --- -- - - - - -
- - - -
- - --
,1985 'Cl
.F EDINA
CHECK RL
ER
r,
01 -21 -85 ,E 15
CHiECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VEVOOI
ITEM DESCRIPTION.__ _
_._ACCOUNT N0. INV.
,q P.O. # MESSAGE
•ar -CKS
021441
01/08/85
1 ►7.00
THE 2RINT SHOP
PRINTING
20- 2010- 000 -00
1 77.7.0
arras
• ** -CKS _
021443
01/08/85
115.13
POMMER 4Fi CO
GEV SUPPLIES
10 -2010- 000 -00
0.21443
0l/C8/85
17.79
POM4ER 4Fi CO
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
132.22 •
r.rrra
*** -CKS"
C.21445
01/1D/85
532.10
PAPER CALHENSON & CO
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
_
532.10
.•. *►•
-- -
ara -CKS
021460.
01/10185
116.10
ROYAL CROWN BEV
INVENTORY
50- 2010 - 000 -00
021467
01/11F85
363.20
ROYAL GROWN BEV
INVENTORY
50- 2010 - 000 -00
_
021463.
01/15/85
47.35
ROYAL CROWN BEV
INVENTORY
50- 2010 - 000 -00
586.65
021461
01 /C8f85
217.65
REED SALES & SERVICE
REPAIR PARTS
27 -2010- 000 -00
(121461
01/08/85
582.62
REFD SALES & SERVICE
REPAIR PARTS
27- 2010 - 000 -00
021461
01/10/85
239.73
REED S4-6ES & SERVICE
REPAIR PARATS
27 -4540- 662 -66
1.033.00 •
999•.9
-- -
War -CKS
021463
U.1/15185
29151.50
REX )IST
INVENTORY
0.21463
!;1/15/85
29006.60
REX DIST
INVENTORY
50 -2010- 000 -00
021463
01/10/85
2.535.85
REX )IST
INVENTORY
50- 2010 - 000 -00
69693.95
a•r.aa
* ** -CKS
021467
01/11!85
105.23
ROYAL BEVEIA9E C3
INVENTORY
- 50- 2010 - 000 -00
021467
u.1/10185
625.40
ROYAL 3EV =RAGE CO
INVENTORY
53- 2010- 000 -00
0.21467
01115/85
247.40
ROYAL BEVEIAGE CD
INVENTORY. - __
___50- 4630- 822 -82
978.07 •
•..a••
- . - -- -
- --
aaa -CKS
021469
01/10/85
131.47
ROAD MACHINERY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
131.47 •
021470
01/15/85
25.00
OR RDCKYELL
POLICE SERVICES
10 -4100- 481 -48
25.00
021471
01/11/85
50.00
KENNETH E ROSLAND
REGISTRATION
10 -4202- 140 -14
57.00 •
array•
War -CKS
1985 CITY OF EDINA
HECK NO. DATE
021479 01/11/85
021470 01/11/65
ffffff
021485
0.21 485
021486
021 486
021 492
021 493
021493
011493
021494
x•214 94
021494
f k f Of * *
021 502
021502
C21 5U2
021502
L21 50.3
021 5(25
021505
021505
t f f ► f }
021 508
021 50,8
U21509
021 5U8
U21508
61/10/85
;1/10/85
31/16/85
51/10/85
AMOUNT
430.49
206.92
637.41 *
580.60
77.50
658.17 *
12.95
112.)^
124.95
CHECK REGISTER
VE4DOR
R 8 R SPECIALTIES
R 8 R SP=CIALTIES
STAY= 8'LD3..INSP
STATE 91-03 I43P
DON STREICHER GUNS
DON 3TR.EICHER GU4S
ITEM_ DESCRIPTION
CONT REPAIRS
CONT REPAIRS
BLDG PER BITS
SUR CHG TAX
AMMUNITION
AMMUNITION
01 -21 -85 PAGE 16
ACCOUNT NO* INV* N P.O. # MESSAGE
28- 2010 - 000 -00
28- 2010 - 000 -00
- * ** -CKS
10 -2010- 000 -00
19-2010-000-03
10 -4572- 420 -42
10- 4572 - 422 -42
0.1/10/85
3.90
SOUTROALE FDRD
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
3.90 •
U1/C8/85
69306.70
SOUTHSIDE DIST COIN:
INVENTORY
50- 2010 - 000 -00
01/15/85
1 *982.75
SOUT -qSIDE )IST CO INC
INVENTORY
50- 2010 - 000 -00
01/08/85
- - 180.75
SOUTHSIDE DIST CDI4C
INVENTORY
- ._ _ -- - - - --
50- 2010 - 000 -00
- - - -- -
89471.50
01/10/85
19.38
SWEEIEP- BROS TRACTOR _
REPAIR PARTS
_ 10- 2010- 000 -00
u1/10/85
14.57
SWE_4 =1 B °OS TRACTOR
REPAIR PARTS
10 -2010- 000 -00
()1/10/85
3.56
SWEE4EY BROS TRACTOR
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
37.51
01/10/85
32.86
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
0.1/10/85
7.44
SUBU13A -4 CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
0.1/10185
21.17
SUBU13CY CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS __
10- 2010 - 000 -00
51/10/85
24925
SUBUrRB11N :HEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
10 -2010- 000 -00
85.72
X1/10/85
47.61
SUBUIBA;4 3LUMB SUP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
47.61
0.1/ ^8/85
98.75
SUN
4DVERTISING
10- 2010 - 000 -00
!11/10/35
86.86
SUN
ADVERTISING
10- 4210 - 140 -14
01/16/85
11.39
SJN
ADVERTISING
10- 4210- 140 -14
197.79 •
01/10/85
2.16
ST PAJL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
- 10- 2010 - 000 -00
u1/15/85
18.54
ST PAUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
01/10/85
_ 7.39 _._ -
ST DAUL -BOOK
GEN_ SUPPLIES------------
10-2010-000-00
01/15/85
12.13
ST P%JL BOOK
SEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
0.1/10/85
263.86
ST PAUL BO)K
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
* * *-CKS
* ** -CKS
* **-CKS
*•* -CKS
1985 lIT,
r EDINA
CHECK REG.-._R
01 -21 -85 4: 17
J
HECK NO.
DATE
AMOJNT
V =w)0
ITEM DESCRIPTION- -
_ - -- ACCOUNT NO.. INV..O
-P.O. 4 MESSAGE
021508
7.1/10/85
3.30
ST PAUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
021508
0.1/08/85
7.20
Si PAUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
0215C8
J.1/10,/85
25.20 -
ST PAUL BOOK
CREDIT
10- 2010 - 000 -00
021508
01/10/85
36.56
ST DAUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
021508
01/10/85
3504
ST PAUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
U2157,8
u1 /1Of85
77.95
ST PAUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010- 000 -00
021508
CAf10 /35
3.45
ST PAUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
.12150?
01/10185
32.40
ST PAUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
U215018
01/10185
51.55
ST 24JL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010- 000 -00
021508
0.1/10/85
25. °0-
ST :14UL BOOK
CREDIT
10- 2010 - 000 -00
021509
01/10/85
3709
ST PAUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010- 000 -00
021508
61/15/85
6.72
Si 3AUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 260 -26
021508
J.1/10f85
40.25
ST PAJL B)OK
GEV SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
021508
iil /10/85
4131
ST PAUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 421 -42
021508
0.1/15/85
18.30
ST PAUL B70K
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 440 -44
U2150.8
u.1/15/85
7.14
ST PAUL B)OK
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
r
021508
L.1/15/85
209.32
ST PAUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES _- ..
10- 4504 - 510 -51
U21509
u1108/85
8167
Sf 34;UL BOOK
OFFICE SUPPLIES
20- 4516 - 600 -60
_
1121508
0.1/15185
9.32
Si PAUL BOOK
INVEN SUPPLIES
23 -1209- 000 -00
021509
01/15/85
2176
ST PAUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
23- 2010- 000 -00
021508
7.1/15/85
12.81
ST PAUL BIOK
GEN SUPPLIES
23- 2010 - 000 -00
021508
U1/15/85
27.31
ST PAUL BOOK
INVENTORY
23- 2010 - 000 -00
U2150.8
u1/15/85
34.78
ST 2AlUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES _
23- 2010 - 000 -00
021508
U1f10185
1018
ST PAUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
23 -2010- 000 -00
021 5U
01/15/8!
6.72
ST PAUL BOOK
INVENTORY SUPPLIES
23 -2010- 000 -00
U21508
.1/10/85
37152
Sf 3A;UL BOOK
OFFICE SUPPLIES
27 -2010- 000 -00
021509
71/08185
4.15
Si PAUL BOOK
OFFICE SUPPLIES
27- 4516 - 661 -66
021508
u1110/85
1.35
ST PAUL BOOK
OFFICE SUPPLIES
27 -4516- 661 -66
967.73 •
rfff••
* ** -CKS
021511
0.1/15/85
22.95
SOUTIERIN VACUUM SERV
SERVICES
50- 4236- 861 -86
22.95
•rf -CKS
021516
01/1C/85
8.11
SEARS ROEBUCK
x-
TOOLS
10- 2010- 000 -00 .-
021516
01/10/85
211.99
SEARS ROEBJCK
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
021516
01/10/85
74.94
SEARS ROEBUCK
TOOLS
10- 2010- 000 -00
021516
01/10/85
64.99
SEARS ROEBUCK
OFFICE SUPPLIES
27- 2010 - 000 -00
021516
01/11/85
74.19
SEARS ROEBUCK
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 2010 - 000 -00
021516
31/11/85
4.20-
SEARS ROEBUCK
CREDIT
213- 2010 - 000 -00
021515
31/11/85
177.11
SEARS ROEBUCK
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 708 -70
607.1 3 •
r f f f f•
,
** *- CK S
0.21542
iu.1108f85
59177.27
THORP= DIST
INVENTORY
50- 2010- 000 -00
59177.27 •.
frfrf•
*** -CKS
0,21548
u1 /CS/85
98.80
THE PRINT SMOP
PRINTING
23- 2010 - 000 -00
98.80
1955 CITY
0= EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
01 -21 -85
PAGE 18
CHECK N0.
DATE ._ ..._._
_- .__._- AM DUN T-- __
VEND03
IJEM_ DESCRIPTION_ -
- -- ACCOUNT- NO.__INV.- _M_PrO. #.MESSAGE
ff•ff•
••• -CKS
021567
U1/10/85
80.81
VINC =NT BRASS 8 ALUM
REPAIR PARTS
20 -2010- 000 -00
rfr +r•
r++ -CKS
021569
U1/08185
486.63
VALLEY IND'PROPANE
GASOLINE
28- 2010 - 000 -00
486.63 •
fff kff
+ ++-CKS
021578
01110/85
_ _ _-_.. 9.12. _ __._.
WM.H.ZTEGLER_ CO_INC
PAIR TS- _--
10- 2010 - 000- 00.._-_ -..
9.12
0.21579
01/10/85
„_. 31.63
HILL[ AMS ST_EL -HDWE --.-
_.GEN - SUPPf._IES _._
2010 - 000- 00._____
021579
01/10/85
225.18
WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE
TOOLS
.10-
10 -2010- 000 -00
`
021579
;11/10/85
184.98
WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -2010- 000 -00
441.79 •
•frf►f
+•+ -CKS _.
021583
110.28
:110.28
WALD)R ?U4P 3 --QUIP
REPAIR PARTS
4D- 2010 - 000 -00
4:4 +
+f•• +•
••• -CKS
021590 - _
_ 41 /15/85_
-_____ 1 D3.00
HEURr _Y�03_LESKI_ - -__
POLLEE SERVICES
10- 4100 - 420 -42_
-_ -
- -- -
fff R•r
+ +; -CKS
J
021592
..1/16/85
76.80
MID C_NTR1_ FIRE
GEV SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 449 -44
4L1592
0. 1/ 11/85857.37
MID CENTRAL _FIRE
GEN_ SUPPLIES
10- 4504 -- 646- 64_____
933.80
_-
f•ff••
- - - -- -- -- _ .----- -- --
-- -- -- --
_.
••• -CKS
021596
01/15/85
335.10
TELE - TERMINALS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 4516 - 510 -51
335.00 +
• + +•rr
• ++ -CKS _
021613
01/10/85
109.70
MCNEILUS STEEL
PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
421613
01/10/85
117.50
MCNEILUS STEEL
REPAIR PARTS
10.2010- 000 -00
_ 02161.3. _ _
-v 1./10185
-__- 94.37
MC- 4:.ILUS- S_LEE_L
_GEN-SUPP -LIES
20n2Q10- 000 -00-
_
321.57 •
frrff •
-
- -
- - - -- - -- ---- -- - - --
- - - - - -- -- - - - - --- - ----
- -- --- - --
•r• -CKS
021700
01108/85
T8.00
DAY )IST CJ
INVENTORY
50- 2010- 000 -00
_..
- - - --
T8.02 +
-_ - -.-
--
-- -- -
-- -- -
021701
021701
01/C8R5
250900
KEMSSON IVDUSTRIES
CONT SERVICES
10 -2010- 000 -00
H
` 19°- 5CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK RESISTER
01 -21 -85 PAGE 19
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENOO2
ITEM DESCRIPTION___ .__ACCOUNT_
N0.__ INV.. N_ P.O. N - MESSAGE
250.00
021 /0.2
U1/ 08/85
185.7.7
MRP4'
DUES
10 -4204- 600 -60
195.00 +
021703
U1/ ^8/85
715.00
ROBEIT C KINGHORN
CONSTRUCTION
10 -1424- 000 -00
02170.3
01/08/85
7.31
R39EAT C KINGHORN
CONSTRUCTION
10 -1425- 000 -00
721703
U1/(18185
7.30-
R09EIT C KINGHORN
CORRECTION
10-14 25- 000-00
021703
U1 /C8 /95
737.30
R38EAT C KINGHORN
CONSTRUCTION
10 -1425- 000 -00
1x445.33
021104
J110B/85
232.96
HILO_N BUS FORMS
GEY SUPPLIES
23- 2010 - 000 -00
021704
J1 /O8/85
330.34
HOLDEN BUS FORMS
PRINTING
28 -2010- 000 -00
563.33
U21/0,),
11/08/85
35.10
MARCI4: GERST
REFUND SKI LESSONS
20- 2010 - 000 -00
021705
01/08/85
35.30
MARCIA GERST
REFUND SKI LESSONS
20 -2240- 000 -00
U2170.5
01/08/85
35.10-
MARC 14 GERST
CORRECTION
20 -2240- 000 -00
35.30 *
J2110.6
31/P8/85
15 ?.J']
NATIONAL 3CREE4PRINT
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 2010- 000 -00
157.]7 *
U2170.7
01/08/85
3400
AUDI) GROJP
A6YERTISIN6
50- 4214 - 822 -82
021107
U1 /^s3 /85
3400
AUDIO GROJ21
ADVERTISING
50- 4214 - 862 -86
69.10 *
_
U21 /n,8
U1/08/85
31.50
LOUIS C A3RA4AM
MILEAGE
30- 4208 - 787 -78
31.60 +
0217!19
01/08/85
749.51
Ism
EQUIP RENTAL
10 -2010- 000 -00
749.51
02171 ^.,
U1 /f8/85
145.00
JERIFS LA4DSCAPEE
CONT REPAIRS
50 -2010- 000 -00
145.00 •
_
021711
01/08/85
521.10
RETAIL DATA SYSTEM
SERV CONT =
10 -4288- 510 -51
021111
J1 /C8/85
19064920
RETAIL DATA SYSTEM
SERV CONTRACTS
50- 4288- 822 -82
0.21711
01/08/85
29038.30
RETAIL DATA SYSTEM
SERV CONTRACTS
50- 4288 - 842 -84
021711
01/08/95
19551.00
RETAIL DATA SYSTEM
SERV CONTRACT
50- 4288 - 862 -86
59174.00
021712
0.1/08/85
25.00
SESAC I14C
LICENSES
28 -2010- 000 -00
25.00 *
_
021113
01/08/85
160000
82043 :47ST MUSIC INC
LICENSES
28 -4310- 708 -70
163.30 +
021714
01 /0P /85
2ft908
DALE LUNDGREN
MILEAGE ARENA
28- 2010 - 000 -00
28.98 •
U21715
U1 /CS/85
101.00
WALL STIRE T JOURNAL
SUBSSCRIPTION
10- 4204 - 140 -14
101.0 o
...r..
• * + -CKS
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
01 -21 -85 PAGE 22
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
UENDOt_
ITEM DESCRIPTION___ -_
,,.ACCOUNT NO., INV. # P.O. 4 MESSAGE
U21117
01/10/85
24.10
PARK MAINT
DUES
10- 4204 - 600 -60
24.70
*
021718
01 /10 /85
20159.00
- STADTU9S UNLIMITED
REPAIR PARTS -
10- 2010- 000 -00
2.158.3.0
,
021719
01/10/85
29000000
W^HRM4•d CONSJLTANTS
CONSTRUCTION
10 -2010- 000 -00
29000.00
UZ1720
J.1 /10/85
36.10
RUTH E_:LEd
REFUND .ART CENTER
23- 3500 - 000 -00 .
36.00
•
921721
J1/10/85
21.70
SINDIA VIL3UR
REFUND ART CENTER__
23- 3500- 000 -00
21.00
•
021722
01/10/85
_ _ _ 18.00
ELIS= FARdUM
REFUND-ART CENTER_
_23. -3500- 000 -00
18.'0
•
021723
U1 /10/85
18.00
LORI R4DM =R
REFUND ART CENTER
23- 3500 - 000 -00
18. ^0
.
021 724
31/10/85 _
_ _ 18.00
_ _ _-KAY, 4CMAINS
REFUND ART CENTER
3500- 000- 00__._
18.00
_ __-
_,__23-
021725
01/10/85
18.00
BONNIE. SCIANZENBACH
REFUND ART CENTER-
23- 3500 - 000 -00
19.00
•
021726
31/10/85 -
_ _ 20.00
-_ _ _ DAM ?IELTI .
_I4ST_4RT_CENTER.- ___
20.OD
•
-__.
__21-4100-614-61
r
021727
01/10/85
192.10
PHYL HAYW4
INST ART. CENTER
23- 4100- 614-61
192.10
•
021728
01/10/85
_ ._ 16 ^.00
_ MARGARET GUST
INST ART .CENTER
23- 4100 - 614 -61
160.00
•
(121729
01/10/85
53700
JUDY LIEBE2
INST ART-CENTER
23- 4100 - 614 -61
537.30
•
_
021730
01/10/85
588.30
SUSAN =RAMS
-
INST ART.CENTER __-
_ 23 -4100- 614 -61
588. 33
•
021731
01/10785
550.1-0
BETTY HOOD
INST ART CENTER _ -
23- 4100 - 614 -61
557.33
•
021132
U1/10185
48.47
_ DEPT OF PROPERTY TAI(_ -_-
_POSTAGE___10
-2010- 000 -00
48.47
021733
01/101/85
96. ?O
STATE TREASURER
PLANTING__& TREES----
96.3D
021734
01/1078'
1 v452.UO
. _. -._ __INDUSTRIAL UTILITIES__,. .
CON T_REPAIRS-- __40-
- 2,010- 000 -00
19452.OD
•
-
Y
021735
01/10/85
_ - 97.52
_ __.._AUTO COM34.4Y _-
_.._
REPAIR PARTS___ -___ ___
10- 2010 - 000 -00 _
198'51 C.
JF EDINA
CHECK R, TER
01 -21 -85 jE 21
CIIECK NC.
DATE
AMOUNT
VEyDOV
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. R MESSAGE
97.52
•
U21/36
11/1D/85
63.75
POWEI SYSTEMS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
63.75
•
021137
01/10/85
80.17
AMI
GEN SUPPLIES '
20- 2010- ODO -00
80.17
+
021738
01/10/85
15030
MI C114E "REVELATION
MEMBERSHIP
10 -4204- 421 -42
15.00
021139
J,1/10/85
133.30
PTAC
PEFORMACE COURSE
10- 4202 - 421 -42
130.10
+
02174.
01/10/85
45.00
Pr ac
DEFENSIVE TACTICS
10- 4202 - 421 -42
45.00
021741
01/10/85
225.21
HAROLD SWANSON
UNIFORM PURCHASES
10 -4266- 422 -42
225.21
•
021142
01/10/85
63.69
OLIN_ nRa
SAFETY EQUIP
10- 2010 - 000 -00
63.69
•
0,21743
01/10/85
384.10
IDENTI KIf COM?
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226- 422 -42
394 00
+
021744
01/10/85
50.00
JOHN WILKIE
REFUND ARENA
28- 3415- 000 -00
53.03
•
U21145
11/10/85
18D.00
JOHN SCHIRMANG
REIMBURSEMENT
10 -4202- 490 -49
021746
01110/85
123.39
BROI(Ok'LE CfgRYSLER
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
121.39
•
021747
01/10185
45.50
KAY SCHL03SER
ART WORK SOLD
23- 3625- 000 -00
45 .5 0
+
U,21 748
11/10/85
6.75
WI4 SOTIEPIIENS BUICK
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
021148
01/10/85
4.70
WIN SDTEPHENS BUICK
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
U21748
01/10/85
25.35
WIN SDTEPHENS BUICK
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
37.30
.
_
021749
01/10/85
6.92
0 & 7 TRUCK
REPAIR PARTS
10 -2010- 000 -00
6.92
+
-
U21750
01/10/85
_ ___.__104.18
_ __ -M R SIGN_: -O _ _
SIGNS &_POSTS
2010 - 000 -00_
104.18
+
, -_
__10-
021751
01/10/85
- 5.89
NORTHERN -POWER PROD
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
5.39
+
0.21752
01/10/85
_ 85.00
-- NELS3N.RADIG_COMM
CONT REPAIRS
10-2010-000-00
85.00
_
•
921 755
01/10/85
41.01
CARL3DY EQUIPMENT CO
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -2010- 000 -00
1985 CITY
07 EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
01 -21 -85 PAGE 22
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT. .. .
V-VDOR
ITEM-DESCRIPTION--.
NO.. INV. 4 P.O. N MESSAGE
_
41.01 •
021754
J1/10/85
141.31
WILEiSKr AUTn PTS
PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
_
141.31 •
021755
01/10/85
97.30
COP
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
_
97.30 •
U21156
)1/10/85
93.20
AFFILIA:TEI EMERGENCY
SERVICES
10- 4224 - 470 -47
90.0 •
C21757
01/11/85
985.90
REMINGTON 4•RMS CO
RENTAL OF PROPERTY
10- 3230 - 000 -00
985.90 +
021158
J1 /11/85
19098
CONCESSIONS
28- 2010 - 000 -00
13.93 •
SCOTSMAN MIDWEST
021(59
1.1/11/85
18.10
AM 94KERIES CO
CONCESSIONS
28 -2010- 000 -00
19.10 +
U21750,
01/15/85
53.33
HOL4;TEN ICE RINKS
GEN SUPPLIES
28 -4504- 708 -70
59.33 +
021761
01/15/85
19.58
LOUIS ABRAHAM
MILEAGE
40 -4208- 787 -78
19.68 •
021762
01/15/85
31.10
MAURICE WEBEIT
RE --UND
28- 3415 - 000 -00
30.70 •
021763
01/15/$
321.11
CONSJLTIING EN
SERVICES
40- 4220 - 811 -80
321.11
021154
01/15/85
414.36
WALKER
CONT SERV
10 -2010- 000 -00
414.36 •
021755
01/15/85
29206.37-
STR0 R RD;COE
CORRECTION
60- 1300 - 262 -04
021755
91/15/85
2.206.37
STRGA;R R4SC0!:
CONSTRUCTION
60 -1300- 262 -04
021765
01/15/85
29206.37
3TRGAR ROSCOE
CONSTRUCTION _
60- 2010 - 000 -00
29206.37 •
021755
)1/15/85
312. 10
FLAKERT(YS
INVENTORY_.. --
50- 2010 - 000 -00
312.) *
021 767
01/15/85
59.00
Rr_SU-_ ROOTER
CDNT_ REPAIRS - _
28- 2010 - 000 -00
59.)7 •
021758
01/15/85
36.82 _ __-
__JILL HANSON__.. _.-
-- SERVICES.____
23- 41.00 - 614- 61
36.82 •
-__. _
• 021769
U1/15/85
387.76
H^LDEV BUS FORMS
PRINTING.
27 -2010- 000 -00
387.76 •
U21 770
01/15/85 .__
_ 276.59_ _ -_. ,-
_ OZALID COlm _
. -BLUE PRI_NTIN6_-- __.___10-
- 4570 - 260 -26
276.59 •
021 771
01/15/85
- 236.55 -- -
RTW .INC _ _ -.
_CORRECTI.ON . __
---10-4'260-000-00
' � nw
1935 Cl
F EDINA
CHECK RL
.R
01 -21 -85 E 23
- r •
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
V_14001
ITEM DESCRIPTION__..,
- ACCOUNT NO. INV. A_P.O. # MESSAGE
021771
01/15/85
236.55
RTW IN-
INSURANCE
10- 4260- 000 -00
021771
01/15/85
236.55
RTW ING
INSURANCE
10- 4260 - 51.0 -51
235.55 +
021772
7.1/15/85
200.25
GMC T2UCK CENTER
REPAIR PARTS
10 -2010- 000 -00
200.25 *
021773
0.1/15/85
800.70
JR H EOUIPMENT DEPOT
ROAD EOUIF
10- 4912 - 560 -56
-
803.)0 •
721714
01/15/85
43977
MV DEPTi 0= PUBLIC
TELETYPE
10- 4268- 420 -42
40.00 +
0.21 775
01/15/85
79.53
MAPLE
BOOKS
10- 4502 - 420 -42
79.50 *
021776
01/15/85
64.90
R V ASSOC
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10 -4512- 440 -44
64.30 +
U21117
j1/16/85
44.74
NTL =IIE 'PROTECTION
FIRE PREVENTION
1D- 4650- 440 -44
44.74 +
021/18
01/16/85
75.70
ALL STEEL 2RODUCTS
CONSTRUCTION
60- 2010 - 000 -00
75.03 +
- _ --
021779
01/16/8'
129223.75
H.l.M.E. INC
JOBS BILL
10- 1139 - 000 -00
129223.15 •
021780,
01/15/85
137.50
JAMES 3.,EH2 -
CLOTHING
- -- --- -- -- - ...
104266- 440 -44
-- - - - -
1 97.5 9 ,
-
021781
01/15185
137.50
WM B)WLER
CLOTHING
10 -4266- 440 -44
137.50 •
421782
01/15/85
137.50
DENNIS CAIN
CLOTHING
10 -4266- 440 -44
1 37.50 +
021783
01/15/85
137.50
RICH %RD HELMER
CLOTHING
= 10- 4266 - 440 -44
137.50 •
721784
01/15/85
137.50
JAMES JULJOWSKI
CLOTHING
10- 4266- 440 744
137.50 +
021785
01/15/85
137.50
STEPHEI LANDRT
CLOTHING -
10- 4266- 440 -44
137.50 *
021755
J1/15/85
137.50
ROBE2T LA /SON
CLOTHING
10 -4766- 440 -44
137.50 +
021787
01/15/85
137.50
LEROY LISK
CLOTHING
10 .-4266- 440 -44 _
137.50 *
U21 188
ut /1S /85
137.50
WM LUTTIS
CLOTHIING
10- 4266- 440 -44
137.50 * -
- - - .- --- - - - - - -- --
- - -- -- _ .. --- - - -..
U2178-9
01/15/8:
137.50
JOHN MALOIEY
CLOTHING
10- 4266- 440 -44
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
01 -21 -85 PAGE 24
v CFFECK_ NO.
_DaTE _,.___._•._
AMOUNT,._____.- _ - -_.
--
DESCRIPT• IONACCOUNT-
NO.- I_NV._Ii.- _P_.0..._t1 -MESSAGE
137.50 +
021790
01/15/85
- -- - - - --
137. 50
- - - - - - ....
RICHARD MYRE
- -- - --- - -- - ---- - - -
CLDTMING
- -- -1 - -- - - - - - -- - - - - -- -
10- 4266 - 440 -44
_
137.50 •
021791
01/15/85
137.50
JA!McS tL'OBINSON
CLOTHING
10 -4266- 440 -44
137.50 +
021792
-
01/15/85
- - -- --- - - - — -
137.50
- - -- - - - - -' - - - - - ----- -- _
JOEL 2ADJ_VOVICH
_ - - -- — - -
:LOTHING
-- -- - _ -- - - - - - .
10 -4266- 440 -44
�
1 37.50
021793
U1/15/85
-- - 137950 —
ALLEV ROT4E
CLOTHING
10- 4266 - 440 -44
137.50.+
021194
11/15/85
137.50
RONAL) SAMUELSOV
:LOTNING
1D- 4266 - 440 -44
137.50 +
021795
01/15/85
137.50
JAMES SINGLETON
CLOTHING
10 -4266- 440 -44
_ 02119b
01 /15/85
137.50
CLOTHING
10- 4266- 440 -44
a.+ -CKS
02179 1
0.1/15/85
137.5 0
GREG SMEGAL
CLOTHING
10- 4266- 440 -44
137.50 +
i U21798
01/15/85
137.50
RICHAAO V ---ANON
CLOTHING
10- 4266 - 440 -44
137.50 +
� V
021799
01/15/85
137950
KEN 4ELS04
CLOTHING
10 -4266- 440 -44
i'
137.50 +
021800.
01/15/85
301.13.
TED ?AULFRAN2
CLOTHING
10- 4266 - 440 -44
- �
300. 13,*
v
021801
0„1/15/85
300.10.
FRANK WELLMAN
CLOTHING
10- 4266- 440 -44
307.10.*
02180.2
0.1/15/85
30000.
TERRY KEHOE
CLOTHING
10- 4266 - 440 -44
300.10 +
021803
0.1/15/85
303.1D.
MM HANSEN
CLOTHING
10- 4266- 440 -44
300.)9,
021804
01/15/85
300.30
UM FECK-
CLOTHING
10 -4266- 440 -44
_
300.70. •
_
--
-
s
021805
0.1/16/85
60.00
MARGgR:T !_EE
INSTRUCTOR
23- 4100 - 614 -61 —
60.00 +
U218Q6
01/16/85
64.30-
KATHY GUSTAFSON
INSTRUCTOR
23- 4100 - 614 -61
64.10 +
021BQ7
01/16/85
200.0,0
BOB COIMNOLLY
INSTRUCTOR
23- 4100 - 614 -61
200.00 +
1985+ CI TY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
U2180,8
0.1/16/85
021809
'.1/16185
0215 1C
.1/16/85
021 811
01/16/85
021 812
U1 /16/85
IJ21812
u.1/16195
021812
01/16/85
021813
U- 1/16/85
021S14
01 /16/85
u21815
(i1/16/85
021816
D1/16/85
021817
(;1/16/85
021818
L1/16/85
021 81 9
0.1/16/85
021820
01/16/85
021821
0.1 /16%85
021822
11/16/85
021823
L1/16185
021824
01/16/85
CORRECTION
30- 4310 - 000 -00
8
CHECK REGISTER
01 -21 -85 PAGE 25
AMOUNT
V_N301
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INY. R P.O. 4 MESSAGE
216.00
JO FIENCH
INSTRUCTOR
23 -4100- 614 -61
216. ^D
•
-
-
199.30
STAR OFFICE MACHINES
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 260 -26
199.10
•
-
- - -
53.00
M =TR) PIAT) CHIEF
DUES
10- 4204 - 440 -44
53.77
•
510.51
Mfl D:-'PT OF REVENUE
GASOLINE
10- 2010- 000 -00
510.51
•
75.37-
GENE BART7_
CORRECTION
30- 4310 - 000 -00
75.00
GENE BARTZ
EXAMINATION
30- 4310- 000 -00
75.00
GENE BART2
HATER WATER CERT
30- 4310 - 809 -80 '
75.00
•
27J.D0
MN POLLJTIDN CONTROL
SCHOOL
40- 4202 - 809 -80
270.00
•
173.05
X'ERO(
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 2010 - 000 -00
173.15
19056.20
LABOR R1= LATIONS ASSN
CONT SERV
10- 2010 - 000 -00
19055.23
•
23.80
EDINA EMPLOYEES CLUB
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 500 -50
28.ap
•
450.00
UNIVERSITY OF
CONFERENCE
10- 4202 - 440 -44
453.00
47.:`0
INTL SOCIETY OF
DUES
10- 4204 - 440 -44
40.10
398.25
CHERYL LYVN BREID
CONT SERV '`
= 10 -4200- 500 -50
398.25
215.1)
PTA:
MANAGEMENT COURSE
10 -4202- 420 -42
215. ?0
•
45900
PTAC
DEFENSIVE TACTICS
10- 4202 - 421 -42
45.00
•
4.99
RADIO SCHACK
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 460 -46
4.99
•
5.30
FIRE INSTRUCTORS
DUES
10- 4204 - 440 -44
5.09
•
90000
MINNESOTA STATE
DUES
10- 4204- 440 -44
97.00
•
••• -CKS
8
1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -21 -85 PAGE 26
CAIECK N0. DATE _ 4yDUN� V= VDOt IT.EM. DESCRIPTIONAC�AUNT_NO.INV. _.f- P.O.p MESSAGE
346U67
01/16/85
_. _ 10.35
CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI _._ _.-
_ _- - -. 50 -4628- 822 -82-
MANUAL
346J67
01/16/85
771.90
CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
346067
01/16/85
617.00
CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
346U67
01/16/85
10.35
ED
DISTRI
50- 4628 +842 -84___ -
_. MANUAL
346367
01/16/85
193.25
CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
346767
0.1/16/85
4.05
CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI
50- 4628= 862 -86
MANUAL
346138
U,1/16/85
19606.97
-_
ED
_ _ _ __
PHILLIP'S
-
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
rrrrrr
U1/16185
9.41-
ED
PHILLIOG
50 -3710- 842 -84
+++ -CKS _
346135
01/16/85
4.70 -
EAGL: IfIN-
PIILLI'-S
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
346135
U1/16/85
16.29-
EAGL= WINE
PAILLI01S
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
346135
0.1 /16 /85
1605-
WINE
_ 50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
346135
01/16/85
234.76
EAGLE TIN=
P ILLIDIS _
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
346135
01/16/85
814.37
EAGL2-' MINE
PiILLI'S
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
3461 35
_ 01/16/85 ---------
- -_ - -- 817.26._ -__ -___
-_ EAGLE_ BIN
PHILLIPS
------------ ---. -- 50- 4628 - 862- 86._- _ - -_ --
VANUAL
346138
01/16/85
19829.07 +
ED
P4ILLPS____.___ -- -- �- _ -- --
-_- 503710- 862 -86 _. _-
-- MANUAL
rrrrrr
+ ++ CKS
346138
01/16185
35.90-
ED
PiILLID6
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL _
346138 _-
,_01/16/85 - -___-
3.60-_-.
ED
PHILLIPS
T- 50- 37.10- 822 -82
MANUAL
346138
01/16/85
37.30-
ED
PHILLIPSS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
346138
01/16/85
.27
ED
PMILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL _
346138
01/16/85
6.32- ____
ED
PiILLI'S_
50- 3710 - 822- 82_____-
MANUAL
346138
U,1/16/85
36.74-
-_
ED
_ _ _ __
PHILLIP'S
-
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
_ 346138
U1/16185
9.41-
ED
PHILLIOG
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL _
346138.
_ - _- U1/16/85 _ -,
19.15-
ED
PIILLI'-S
_50- 3710 - 842 -84__ __, - -____
MANUAL
346138
0.1/16/85
84.96-
ED
PAILLI01S
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
_ 346138
01/16/85
15.43-
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL _
346138
U.1/16f95 _
3.54 _
ED
P ILLIDIS _
59-3710-962-86
MANUAL
346138
U1/16/85
10.67-
ED
PiILLI'S
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
346138
01/16/85
104.13-
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
346138
01/16/85
-_ 69.66-
ED
P4ILLPS____.___ -- -- �- _ -- --
-_- 503710- 862 -86 _. _-
-- MANUAL
346138
U1/16/85
11.72-
E)
PiILLI 33
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
346138
U1/16/85
1.06
ED
P1,ILLI3S
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL _
346138
U1/16/85 _.
19864.75 __.
_ _ __ -ED
PHILLI °S .._- - -___
50 -4626- 822 -82 _ -_
MANUAL
346138
J1/16/85
1,795.10
ED
PATLLIPIS
50 -4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
346138
0.1/16/85
19802.01
ED
Pi1 LLIo,S
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
346138
_ 01/16/85
49243.00
_ED_
PHILLIPS - - - -- - -- --- -- - -- - -
_
- - -- -- --
- MANUAL
346138
0.1/16/85
59206.50
ED
PHILLIPis
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
346138
01/16/85
181.86-
E7
PMILLrPis
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL .,
346138
0.1116/85 _ __- _--
39483.02ED
PiILLIaS._. __ -- _
50-4626-862-86
MANUAL
346138
01/16/85
9.95-
E)
PHILLIPS
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
346138
U.1/16/85
316.20
ED
PiILLIDlS
50- 4628- 822 -32
MANUAL -
_ 34613801/16
/85,. _
187 -.7.0_
FD-
PHILLI °3 - --
T -50- 4628 - 822 -82._
MANUAL
346138
0.1/16/85
410.60
ED
PiILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
346138
01/16/85
957.40
ED
P4ILLIpS
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
346138
0.1/16/85 ___771
*65
_ E]
P4ILLI 35 _.
_ 50 -6628- 862- 86__________�_
MANUAL
346138
U.1/16/85
53.00-
ED
PHILLIPS
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
346138
01/16/85
586.07
ED
Pi ILLIDIS
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL ..
5461.38
u1/16/85
533.68
7
_P MIL.L,IR __
50- 4628 - 862 -86
-- MANUAL
219525.84 •
r r r r r a
- - - -- --
- - - - --
- - - -- - - -
4
- + r r- C K S
11985SCITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER
CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR
346193
60 /16/85
5.15-
GRIGGS
COOPER
AND C
34619J
01/16/85
20.49-
GRIGGS
COOPER
AND C
346190
01/16/85
154.83-
GRIGGS
CO3PER
AND C
346190
0.1/16/85
10.30-
GRIG33
CO3 PER
AND C
346197
il/16/85
94.84-
GRIGGS
COOPER
AND C
346190
01/16/85
257.60
GRIGGS
COO ?ER
AN) C
346190
01/16/85
1,024.44
GRIGGS
COOPlER
AND C
346193
11/16/85
79115.55
GRIGGS
COOPER
AND C
346192'
J.1/16/95
515.20
GRIGGS
COOPER
AND C
346190
01/16/85
4.742.12
GRIGGS
COOPER
AN)
1207
INTERCONTINENTAL
13.970.30
50 -4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
49788.66
***r **
346271
346211
346271
346271
3462 71
3462 71
346271
346271
346271
346271
346 21 1
345271
346271
346271
346271
346271
346271
346271
346271
346271
346271
346271
34627 1
346271
346271
346271
346271
346271
346271
346271
345271
346 21 1
346271
346285
346285
346 28'5
01/16/85
0.1/16/85
01/16/85
01/16/85
01/16/85
01/16/85
61/16/85
01/16/85
01/16/85
01/16195
3.1/16/85
71/16/85
01/16/85
01 /16/85
0.1/16/65
01/16185
01/16/85
U1/16/85
01 /16 /85
01/16/85
01/16/85
01/16/85
J1/16185
01/16/85
01/16/85
01/16/85
01/16/85
71/16/85
01/16185
0'1/16/85
01/16/85
01/16/85
01 /16/8 5
01/16/8`
0,1/16/85
01/16/85
01 -21 -85 PAGE 27
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT No. INV. a_P.O. # MESSAGE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3 710- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
50-4626-842-84
MANUAL
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
46.67-
INTE1C34TYNENTAL
PK
50 -3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
6979-
INTERCONTI4EVT4L
PK
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
11.99-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
6.79-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
38.21-
INTERCONTIN_NTAL
PK
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
9.24-
INTEICOVT*_NENTAL
PK
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
95.77-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
3.91-
INTER :OVTINENTAL
PK
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
6.79-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
64.14-
INT =RCOVTINENTAL
PK
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
14.32-
TNTERCONTTNEVTAL
PK
53- 3710- 862.86
MANUAL
2,333.72
I4TER= 34TINENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
1207
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50 -4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
49788.66
INTERCOVTINENTAL
PK _
_ _ 50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
21.40
INTERCONTINENTAL
_
PK
._ _
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
10.130
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50 -4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
3.209.09
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
57- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
3.1.1
IVTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
599.80
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
339.50
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
3.63
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
339.50
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
'' 50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
19910.75
INTERCONT?NEVT4L
PK
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
3.91
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
462.40
INTERCDVTTNENTAL
PK
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
3.00
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
13.50
T4TERC34TTNENTAL
PK
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
3.00
INTE2CO4TI4E4TAL
PK
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
5.10
INTEIC04TINENTAL
PK
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
339.50
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
195.91
TNTERCOVTINENTAL
PK
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
3.00
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
716.15
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
159011.62 •
- -
- -
*** -CKS
4.93 -
_.JOHN304'WINE_
- --
50-3710-822-82
,. MANUAL
42.62-
JDHdi3W WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
13.81-
JOHN30N WINE
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
R
a
e
1965 CITY
OF EDINA
- -.
CHECK REGIST =R
01 -21 -85 PAGE 28
CHECK N0.
_DATE _..
^_ .__ AMOJNT,_
d= ND02 _ _ _-- _I_TEM DESCRIPTION____
- ,___ACCOUNT- _NO...__TNY._.It_
Pa 0. 11 MESSAGE
346285
01/16/85
3.34-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
346285
� 1 /16/85
9049 -__
JOHNSON YIN= _ ._ .. _ _ _ _
_ 50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
3462.55
01/16/85
.11
JDHNSON WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
_ _
MANUAL
346285
01/16/85
3990
JOHNSON• WINE
5D -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
346285
01/16/85 _
- 246.63-___.-
.___JOHNSON .WINE - -_ _ -
_50- 4628- 822- 82.______
MANUAL
346285
u1/16/85
690.76
JOHNSON` WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
_ ____._ _
MANUAL
346285
0.1/16/85
39.30
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
34 62 85
01/16/85
- 10.50
_- .JOHNSON -WINE -,_- -
-50- 4628 - 842 -84_.-
MANUAL
346285
01/16/85
29131.20
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
_
MANUAL
346285
01/16/85
5.62-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
346285
G1/16/85
_ 2.79
JJHVSONWINE
50- 4628 - 862- 86-
MANUAL
346285
01/16/85
494.46
JOHNSON MINE
___
50 -4628- 862 -86
-__
MANUAL
346285
01/16/85
6.60
JOHNSON WINE
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
346285 _
Ul/16/85
_ -_ _ _ 161.46_ -___
,)OH4SOV WINE -_ -__-
_ 50 -4628- 862- 86
MANUAL
01 /16/8 5
131.70
39713.42 •
WINE
345451
0.1/16/85
irff ►+
- - ------
- --- -- - --
- --
--
- t,++ -CKS
346435
01/16/85
12.12-
PRTOi fIN= CO
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
346435
01/16/85
_ _ 10.88-
PRIOR WIN =_CO _
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
346435
01/16/85
12.45-
PRIOR WIN= CO
50- 3710- 862 -86
_f_-
MANUAL
346435
01/16185
605.96
PRIOR WIN: CO
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
346435 _ _
C1/16/85
543.85
- _PRIOR [IN:_CO
50- 4628 - 842- 84
MANUAL
346435
01/16/85
622.53
PRIOR WIN= CO
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
19736.89 +
-- -
rir -CKS
346451
01/16/85_
- -.
345451
01/16/85
47.57-
QUALITY
WINE
346451
01/16/85
6.86-
QUALITY
WIN_
345451
G1/16/85
.39
QUALITV.WINE_
346451
01/16185
9.07-
QUALITY
WIN'
345451
01/16/85
2053-
QUALITY
WINE
345451
01/16/85
92.03-_QUALITY_
- WINE__.__
346451
0.1/16/85
10.29-
QUALITY
WINE
346451
01/16/85
26.54 -
QUALITr
YIN=
345451
0.1/16185
.98-__
345451
01/16/85
1O7.7S-
QUALITY
WINE
346451
01/16/85
075
QUALI Tr
YI'N-
345451
01/16185
- -
_.- QUALITY
346451
01/16/85
29378.7!1
- _WINE__-
QUALITY
.. - -- --
WINE
345451
01/16/85
49601.52
QUALITY'
WINE
346451
01/16/85
_._ _- _59388.36
QUALITY.
YIN_
345451
01/16/85
3.19-
QUALITY
WINE -
345451
01/16/85
635.27
QUALITY
WINE
345451
0.1/16/35
_GJALITYYINE_______
345451
01 /16/8 5
131.70
QUALITr
WINE
345451
0.1/16/85
15012-
GUALITY
WINE
346451
01/16/85498.
64.
345451
0.1/16/85
2.57-
QJALITA
WINE -
346451
01/16/85
19327.18
QUALITY'
WINE
346451 ---- _
01/16./85
514.76
QUALI_TY WIN:___
345451
0- 1/16/85
49.00
QUALITY
YIYE
159530.66 •
a
50 -3710- 822 -82
50 -3710- 822 -82
5D- 3710 - 822 -82
-_ _ -__50- 3710 - 842 -84
50- 3710 - 842 -84
50- 3710- 842 -84
50- 3710 - 842 -84 -
- 50- 3710 - 862 -86
50- 3710 - 862 -86
50- 3710- 862 -86
50 -3710- 862 -86
50- 3710- 862 -86
,.50- 3710 - 862 -86
50- 4626 - 822 -82
50- 4626- 842 -84
___50-4626-862-86
50- 4626 - 862 -86 - -
50- 4628- 822 -82
50- 4628 - 822 -82
50- 4628- 842 -84
50 -4628- 842 -84
50 -4628- 842 -84
50- 4628- 862 -86 - - --
50- 4628 - 862 -86
50- 4628 - 862 -86
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
_- MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
_MANUAL ... _
MANUAL
19351 C. OF EDINA
t
CAIECK NO. DATE
ff.•.i
346540
U1/16/B5
346540
'i1 /16/e5
346540
01/16/85
34654G-
i 1 / 16 /85
346540
01/16/85
346540
31/16185
.ff. ►.
353U67
353U67
353J67
353U67
353135
353135
353135
353135
353135
3531 35
f f f f 1 f
3531 38
3531 33
3531 3?
353138
353138
3531 38
353138
3531 38
35313 P
353138
353139
353138
3531 38
3531 38
353138
353138
3531 38
353138
3531 3F
353138
3531 38
35313,9
U1/16 /85
u1/16/85
01/16/85
01/16/85
D1 /16/85
CHECK Rt- ..,TER
EAGLE WIN_
01 -21 -85 ..GE 29
e40'JNT
Y =NoOl ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
q P.O. f MESSAGE
_ ._._._ .__....__.._..___ 50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
0,1/16/85
•.. -CKS
24.39-
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
2.99-
TWIN CITY WINE
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
149.75
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
19219.55
TWIN CITY W TIN E
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
2.43
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
28.50
TWIN CITY WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
19312.52 •
- - - -- - -
- -. _ -- - -- -- _ _
••..CKS
0.1/16/85
4.15-
ED PiILLI�3
..• -CKS
13.53
CAPITAL CITY DaSTRI
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
19025.'_51
CAPITAL CITY DISTRI
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
2.25
CAPITAL CITY DISTRI
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
179.55_
CAPITAL.CITY DISTRI
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
1 9221.11
7.27-
E9 PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
0.1/16/85
26.71-
••,* -CKS
D1 /16/85
.98-
EAGLE WIN_
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
01/16/95
19.66 --
_ EAGLE id'INE, __ ___
_ ._._._ .__....__.._..___ 50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
0,1/16/85
3.33-
EAGLE WINE
._.
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
J1/16/85
49.80
EAGLE W'INE
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
0.1/16/85
39983.24
EACLE WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
U1/16/85
401.35
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
49344.72 •
--
- - - -- - -
- -. _ -- - -- -- _ _
••..CKS
0.1/16/85
4.15-
ED PiILLI�3
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
0/16/85
107.87-
ED PHILLI ?S
50 -3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
01/16/85
19.94-
ED PHILLI RS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
U1/16/85
14.34-
ED PILL ?DG
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
ul/16/85
7.27-
E9 PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
0.1/16/85
26.71-
ED PiILLI01S
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
-il/16/85
14.37-
ED PiILLIP'S
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
01/16/85
26.09 --
ED PHILLI ?S
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
01/16/85
20956-
E7 PHILLIPS
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
01/16/85
5.74-
ED P41LLIDiS
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
ul/16/85
37.63-
E) PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
0.1/16/85
991.20
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
01116/85
59393931
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
3.1/16/85
363.36
ED PlILLIP;S
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
01/16/85
19304.35
E) PHILLI °S
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
01/16f85
287.00
ED_ PHILLID,S _ _
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
01/16/85
19881.74
ED PRILLIP'S
_ - _
50- 4626- 862 -86
_
MANUAL
0.1/16/85
717.90
E) PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
Ll /16/e5
207950
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
J1/16/85
19335965
E) PHILLIP'S
_
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
01/16/85
718.50
E7 PHILLIPS
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
3]/16/85
- 1027.75
ED PHILLIPS
- - -
50 -4628- 862-86
MANUAL
139948.69 •
_
&&****
* *-CKS
c
c
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
- - I4TEIC04TTNE14TAL
PK --
CHECK REGISTER
19.73-
01 -21 -85 PAGE 30
r CHECK NO.
DATE _-
AHOUNT
- __I_N00? —
_
._.ITE- M_ DES_ CRI?TION_-__-
_- _AC.C.AUNT_NO9.INVe__#_Pe0q_#
MESSAGE
3531 9J
01/16/85
_,_120.38- _
GRIGGS
COOPER
AN)
C _
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
3531 9)
01/16/85
103.90-
GP,IG3S
C01PER
4ND
C
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
_ 353193
1,1/16/85
91.66-
GRIGGS
COOPER
AN)
C
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
353190
01/16/85
69018.95
GRIGGS
CO ?PER
4ND
C
50- 4626 - 822- 82__ -___
___ _ MANUAL
35319)
;71/16/85
59190.13
GRIGGS
COOPER
AND
C
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
_ 353191
)1/16/85
49569.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
AND
C
50 -4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
,.60
INTEtCOYT,INENTAL_PK_._._-
_...__158462.14 f
9.03
69466.31 •
WINE
353285
71/16/85
29049.80
_ ftfttr
WIVE
353295
01/16/85
674.45___
_,JOHNSON
WINE- .�.___
353285
••• -CKS
I
353271
3532/1
353? 71
353271
353211
353271
353271
353271
353211
353271
353271
353271
353271
353271
353271
353Z71
353271
353271
tf ►•t r
01/16/85 _ - --
-- - - -� 1.55 - -
- - I4TEIC04TTNE14TAL
PK --
31/16/85
19.73-
INTEICOVTTNENTAL
PK
01/16/85
____ 5.72 _ _
__' INTERCONTINENTAL
0.1/16185
01/16/85
42.79-
INT= ICOVTINENTAL
PK
61/16/85
3.95
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
01/16/85
_ - _ 1.29 - _ -_
_ INTERCONTTNENTAL
PK___,
01/16/85
T8 .7R-
IVTEICOVTTNENTAL
PK
01/16/85
986.95
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
01/16/85
_ 303
_ I:VTEICONTINENTAL
PK
01/16/85
198.23-
INTEtCOVTTNENTAL
PK
01/16/85
9.30
TVTEICONTINENTAL
PK
01/16/85
_ 21139 967TNTEIC34TT'NENTAL
0.1/16/85
PK.
01/16/85
15.80
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
01/16/85
3,939.30
INTS:RCONTINENTAL
PK
01/16/85 _
78 .50- ._14TEIC04TINENTAL
JOHNS 014-
PK,_____
01/16/85
286.30-
INTERCOVTINENTAL
PK
01/16/85
64.R6
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
01116/85- ,_�_______
,.60
INTEtCOYT,INENTAL_PK_._._-
01116/85
9.03
69466.31 •
WINE
353285
353285
01/16/85
34.51-
JOHNSON'
WINE
353285
01/16/85
.92-
JOHNSO.W
WIVE
353285
0.1/16185
6.87-
JOHNSON
WENE
353285
01/16/85
5.57-
JOHNSOW
WINE
353285
0.1/16/85
3.68-
JOHNSON
WIVE
353285
J1/16/85
40.99-
JOHNSOW
WIVE
353285
01116/85
9.53-
JOHNSOW
WINE
353295
0.1/16/85
1.23-
JOMN33V-
, WIVE _____,._
35328.5
01/16/85
1.23 -•
JOHVSOW
WINE
353285
0.1/16/85
13.415-
JOHNSON
WINE
35328-5
01/16/85
_. 1.73 -,_
ON
WINE
353285
0.1/16/85
6.43.
JOHNS 014-
WIVE
35328 -5
31/16/85
19725.80
JOHNSON
WINE
353285
01/16/85
___7.50_ -
_ JOHNS ON
WINE___ _
353285
01116/85
9.03
JOHVSOY
WINE
353285
71/16/85
29049.80
JOHNS 0*
WIVE
353295
01/16/85
674.45___
_,JOHNSON
WINE- .�.___
353285
01/16/85
3913
JOHNSON
WINE
353285
01/16/85
41.28
JOHNSON
WINE
353285 _
_ 01/16/85_ _
6.0,0
__JO HNS0V
WINE- ,_-,_. - -�
353285
01/16/85
3933
JOHNSON
WINE
353285
0.1/16/85
343974
JOHNSO,W
WINE
- - 9999.. - -- - - -- - -- - -- � �-- ._ -.-•-
"50_3710-U2-_U -
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50-3710-862-86
MANUAL
50-3710-862-86
MANUAL
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
50 -4626- 822 -82 _ _ -_ _
_,- MANUAL
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
50 -4626- 842- 84
MANUAL
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862- 86______-
MANUAL
- --
- ttf -CKS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
...... 5U-3710-822-82
MANUAL
50 -3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
50 -3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
�_- 50- 3710 - 842 -84 _
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
__- 50- 3710 - 842 -84 _
_ MANUAL
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
_ 50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
50 -4626- 822 -82-
MANUAL
50 -4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
5D-4626-842-84
MANUAL
50- 4626- 862 -86 _.
_ _ MANUAL
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
50 -4628- 822 -82_
-50-
MANUAL _.. .
4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
353433
01/16/85
198 -1 Cl
Jr EDINA
fakfif
V= NOD R ITEM DESCRIPTION
C!lECK NO.
DATE
353285
01/16/85
353285
01/16/85
353285
01/16/85
353285
01/16/85
353285
01/16/85
353285
01/16185
353285
01/16/85
353285
01/16/85
353285
1,1/16/85
35328'5
01/16185
353285
01/16/85
353285
11/16/85
353285
01/16/85
35323.5
arrtar
0- 1/16/85
353433
01/16/85
353433
0.1/16/85
fakfif
V= NOD R ITEM DESCRIPTION
353435
61/16/85
353435
01/16/85
353435
01/16/85
353435
61/16/85
353435
0.1/16/85
553435
01/16/85
353435
01/16/85
353435
01/16/85
f r f f a f
553451
353451
353451
553451
353451
353451
353451
353451
353451
353451
313451
353451
353451
353451
353451
353451
353451
3.)3451
353451
DI /16/85
CHECK RL .i =R
QUALITY'
01 -21 -85 jE 31
AMOUNT
V= NOD R ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
27804
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
.60
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184.79
JOHNSOW WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
9.30
JOHNSON WT4E
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
093
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
47600
JOHNSON WIVE
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
61992
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
2.70
JOHNSOV WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
.90
JOHNSON WIVE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
1.50
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
61.92
Jr)HN304 WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
321.89
JOHUiON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
86.90
J3HN30% WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
5.1-0
JOHNS 04 WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
6,231 .46 •
MANUAL
01/16/85
5.57-
QUALITY
PINE
_ _ _ _50-
50 -3710- 862 -86
4**-CKS
4.00
PAUSfIS & SONS
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
193.17
PAUSIIS & SONS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
QUALITY,
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
,
01/16/85
656.35
QUALITY
fff -CKS
1.71-
PRIOR W -I N= C0
50 -3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
10.31-
PRIOR SIN= CO
_ 50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
4.60-
PRIOR WIN_ CO
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
2.45-
PRIOR WINE CO
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
_ 85.50
PRIOR NINE CO -T -
50 -4628- 822 -82_
-50-
MANUAL
515.OD
PRIOR WINE CO
4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
229.86
PRIOR YIN: CO
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
122.50
PRIOR WIN= CO
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
933.80 •
fff -CKS
DI /16/85
17.15-
QUALITY'
WIPE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
61/16/85
67.98-
QUALITY
WINE
_ -_50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
61/16/85
13.12-
QUALITA
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
u,1/16/85
.49-
QJ ALL TV
W14E
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
01/16/85
1.47-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
0.1/16/85
4.76-
DUALITY
WINE
50 -3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
U.1/16/85
9.23-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
0.1/16/85
13.16-
QUALITY
411 NE
50 -3710- 842 -84_
MANUAL
1.1/16/85
25.68-
OUALITV
WINE
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
01/16/85
63.61-
OUALITK
MINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
U1/16/85
52.51-
QUALITY
WINE _
_ 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
01/16/85
5.57-
QUALITY
PINE
_ _ _ _50-
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
C1/16/85
2.R1-
QUALITY
WIN=
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
01/16/85
3,399.33
QUALITY,
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
01/16/85
656.35
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
L'1/16/85
39180.75
QUALITY
WINE
50 -4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
31/16/85
1. 284.45
_OUALITY
WINE ---
___ „-__ -4626- 842- 84______
MANUAL
01/16/85
29625.14
QUALITY
WINE
-_50
50 -4626- 862 -86
__
MANUAL
01/16/85
73.50
QUALITY
WINE
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
01 -21 -85 PAGE 32
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT _
VE,,4DOi _ _ ITEM DESCRIPTION
- ACCOUNT .NO* INV*.
# P*0* A MESSAGE
353451
01/16/65
238.15
OJALITY WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
353451
01/16/85
857.55
QJALITr WTN_
50- 4628- 822.82
MANUAL
353451
U1/16/85
24.50
9UALITf WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
353451
0.1/16/35
658.39
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
353451
01 /16/8 5
461.46
QJALITY WIPE _ -_ __ - -... _
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
353451
UI/16/85
278.59
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
353451
0.1/16/85
14005
QUALITV' WINE
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
139601.83
•rr*1r
*** -CKS
353540
01/16/85
2.30-
TWIN CITY HIVE
50 -3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
353540
01/16/85
1.50-
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
35354J
01/16/85
1.37
TWIN CITY WINE _ __ - -- -_ ,__
_ 50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
35354J
0,1/16/85
2.10
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
353540
0.1/16/8`.
115.21
TWIN CIJ Y WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
353540
01/16/85
_ 75.25
TWIN CITY WING _ -_ _ - -
-_ _. 50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
553540
01/16/85
69.15-
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
353540
L1/16/85
1.50
TWIN CITY WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
122.48
1r
* ** -CKS
353581
G1/16/85
1.95
VINITALIA
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
353557
0.1/16/85
152 *7D
VI NITAL•IA
53- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
353581
01/16/85
.65
VINITALIA
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
353531
0.1/16/85
44.00
VINITALIA
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
198.60 •
*Errs•
t *f -CKS
359067
01/16185
1. 00-
CAPITAL CITY DISTRT _ _. _
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
359067
01/16/85
30.15
CAPITAL CITY DISTRT
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
359067
01/16/85
29396.15
CAPITAL CITY DISTRI
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
29425.30
r*f tt*
* ** -CKS
359129
U1/16/85
68703
B7LL3 f
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
359129
1.1/16/85
69014.50
BELL30Y
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
359129
U1/16/85
2,p814.15
B= LL3Ofi _. . -� _. _ _
50- 4626- 842 -84
_ MANUAL
359 12 9
J.1/16/85
49621.68
BELL30Y
50 -4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
14 9137.33 •
r*rrlr
- - - -- -- -- - - -- - --
-. __
- *** -CKS
359135
U1/16/85
_- 6.29 -_ -__
__.EAGL_ YIN= _ -. -_. _
50- 3710 - 822 -82
_ MANUAL
359135
01/16/85
35. ?0-
EAGLE WIN_
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
359135
01/16/85
24.45-
EAGL_ WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
359135
0,1/16/85
314.?8
EAGL_ NINE _. -
__- 50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
359135
61/16/85
10784.85
EA GL_ YIN_
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
359135
3.1/16/45
1#222.73
EAGL_ WIN_
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
-
-- - 38255.42
* t f t f
-
* ** -CKS
2
• r
19851 CI
F EDINA
CHECK RE
ER
01 -21 -85 E 33
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT_ _
VENDV
ITEM DESCRIPTION ___ - - -. ___ACCOUNT NO. INV...11
P.O. # MESSAGE
359138
01/16/85
5.54 -
ED PIILLIP,S
_ _ 50 -3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
359138
U1/16/85
16.55-
ED PiILLIPB
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
359138
01/16/85
10.78 -
E) PHILLI °S
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
359138
01116/85
134.94-
ED P4IL.LIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
359138
01/16/85
37.98-
ED PWILLIPS
_. _._
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
350138
U1/16/85
25.59-
ED PHILLIPS
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
359138
0,1/16/85
16.20-
EO P4ILLIPig
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
359139
01/16/85
5.41-
ED P41 LLIP13
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
359138
01/16/85
107952-
El PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
359138
01/15/85
106.70-
ED P4ILLI3S
_ 50- 3710 - 862 -86
_ MANUAL
359138
01/16/85
1098 -
ED PHILLIPS
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
359138
0.1/16/85
69747.24
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
359,138
01/16/85
59330.80
ED PHILLIPS
50 -4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
359138
01/16/85
827.25
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
35Y138
U1/16/85
232.30
E) PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
350138
U1/16/85
19329.12
ED PlILLIbs
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
359138
01/16/85
19893.75
ED PHILLIPS
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
359138
01/16/85
538.85
EO PHILLIPlS
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
359138
01/16/85
99.73
F_) PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
359138
01/16/85
59335.10
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
350138
01/16785
270.53
TO PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
359138
u1/16/85
809.93.
ED P1ILLIP13
_ _ 50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
239043.26
999999
rrr -CKS
359190
01/16/85
48.26-
GRIGGS COOPER AN)
C
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
350190.
;:1/16/85
101.43-
GRIGGS COOPER ANO
C
_ ._ `__- _ .. 50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
359190
0.1/16/85
81.43-
GRIGGS COOPER AND C
- .,
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
- 350190
01/16/85
29413.00
GRIGGS COOPER AND C
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
359`190.
1,1/16/85
59071.62
GRIGGS CO3PEI AN)
C
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
350190
0.1/16/85
49074.18
GRIGGS CODER AND
C
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
119327.63 +
....•r
- -
••. -CKS
359271
G1/16/85
22.41-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
„- '' -'= 50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
359271
01/16/85
1.74-
INTEtCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
359271
01/16/85
184.89-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
359271
31/16/85
14.30-
INTERCONTINENTAL
P(
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
359271
01/16/85
14208-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
_
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
359271
01/16/85
16.98-
INTEtCONTINENTAL
PK
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
359271
01/16/85
3.33
I4TEACONTTNENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
35YZ71
01/16/85
19120.76
I4TEI:04TINENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
359271
21/16/85
44915
INTEtC04T?NENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
359271
01/16/85
99221.7.7
!NTEICONTTNE4TAL
PK
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
3591271
01/16/85
26.40 -
INTEt:DNTINENTAL
PK
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
359271
L'1/16/85
79144.J7
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50 -4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
359271
01/16/85
160
IVTERCONTINENTAL
PK
_ 50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
359211
0.1/16/85
87.:0
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
_
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
359271
71/16/85
740946
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
359271
01/16185
6.30
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
359271
01/16/85
- 849.16
INTEtCONTINENTAL
PK
SD- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
3592/1
01/16/85
5.4D
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
s
S
•
•
e
e
Q
e
e
e
f
e
e
e
e
•
e
t
e
c
~=___~'
,pnn czry
OF Emzmx
cmccn xsoosrcn
01~21~85 pxsc 34
CHECK mo°
n«rc -
�����r-__--'
-----���y�o�___-_ '__�_ �I�i-��l��l�Tz40«c��um7_wQ~_zmw°'-w
P°o°'w ncooxsc
189864.37 °
' -- ' - -
- - - -------------'
---' - -
' °°°-cns
i 35v285
unmo/us
a.p,_______Joom3nm
Wmc__ _
so_sYvo~000~na�___
mAmuxL
359285
01x16185
vo.oe~
Joxmsom
mImc
so~sr�o~o�o~u*
--- - MxmoxL
onnzos
01/16v85
o.ao~
uo*m3o4
wrmc
50-3710-842- 84
mxwuxL
35929-5
uvmovmn
_ 72.*3'_
Jo*nnoV
uIwc
50~3710~842~8*
nxwoxL
359285
ulm6/85
15.47~
uonmsum
uzmc
so~sr,o~o«o~m*-'
- --' mxmuxL
n»voon
01/16185
.vs~
Jnxmaox
uIxc
50~3710~862~86
nxmoxL
35p235
o.1x16v8 5
y.zo~unmmSu^#uTnc_
nxmuxL
35928-5
G1/16185
20.25~
unxwsov
wImc
50~3710~862~86
'------ - MxmuxL
351?285
ylv16/85
n.o*~
JoHwnom
WINE
so~orxo~m*a~ma
nxmuxL
359295
o,f^avns
s°xa_
�onxwSum
u I NE_ _.sn~waa6~u4a~m^
- - - mxmoxL
nsvoun
U.1 /16 /85
773.90
Jon m*��
u 14c
so~*ac*~o*a~V*
mAwuxL
359 28'5
uxvvavon
2.43
Jnmmsom
WINE
so~*mco~uoa~oa
n^moxL
s»voxo
oIx16/85______145.70
_Jsxwsnv
wl mc
50~4*28~822~8 2 _--'
_ PxmoxL
x»vzoo
0.1 /16 /85
o°um
Jnom53w
wIwc
50~**28~842~84
mxmuxL
35923n
31x16^85
314.16m
JnHwsmm
mzwc
50~*628~u*2~84
nxmoxL
359295
01v16/85
_ _3x6 21 .*6 -
_Jnwmnow
wE ws-__ -__-
.5n~**zm~m*o~u4
. nomuxL
o»pzos
a1x16^85
8910
unxm;ov
MINE
50~4628~842~84
nxmuxL
359285
01/16/85
64.83
Jo*wymN
wzmc
50~4628~8*2~84
MANUAL
snnau» _
o,x16f85
?51 .*0Jowwaow_uzoc50_46
28~842~84nmmuxL
snvaxv
01/16x85
l°uo
Jm*msmt
urmc
50~**28~862~86
-------- MxmuxL
359285
01/16185
163°41
omwvnmx
wEwc
50~4628~86e~86
nxmuAL
359285
1)1v16185
_ _ _ 18.50 _ _
unwwso*
WINE - _
50~46 28~86 2~86
wxwoxL
35928'5
01x16x85
n°nm
uo*mnnw
wzmc
50~4628~862~86
--- - nxmoxL
359285
01v16/85
*oa.ss
Jw*wnuo
wEwc
50~4628~862~86
nxmuxL
35?285
Jxvv6vwnI-LE)xz.o2_Jnomyox_uzwc--____-_---
��-------no~4aam~uaa~oa----
50~*628~862~86
*xmvxL
359285
o 1fl6f85
�m.no
u)*vnov
WINE
'--' nxmu^L
os*zuo
01v16x85
°oo
umxmsm,'t
uImc
50~4628~862~86
'nxwmxL
°^°~cns
359*35
oix16185-
----------- ���-'----pa/o��zWE'��'----
---- ------------------------50-3710~842--84'----
mxwuxc
359*35
u1 v16 v8 5
s°vs~
pmz01 uzmf CO
50~3710~8*2~84
mxmuxL
s»o*u»
u1/16v85
_ 4.33r _
pmzwa mzms co__-.--_ -_---__--____--_________50~3710~862~86
nxmoxc
359435
u`x16v85
*.om~
pozmm wsmc CO
50~*628~842~8*-----
nxmoAL
359435
0.1/16/85
257°4n
pxz31 uImc Co
50~46 28~84 2~8*
nxwuxL
359435
01 /16/815
uzN�'-c0 _-''-'_''---_-_-___---'____-___'_--'_-__
�xwom�
*os,m� °
-- -- --
°^°°°°
- '----------------'--'-'
'--------
---------------
---'--_ - _-_--'-_'
°°°~cws
. oxp�51
J1/16r85
r°ow~
nuxurp
uImr_
no~or,o~moz-xa
*xmuxL
3x9*51
01m6v85
�.,-ouwLzrr
�
�Emc
n~3rvn~ooa~n
MxmuxL
o:v*��
oxv�avms
vv°n9~
mmxLIrr
wzwE
50~3710~822~82
- nxwuAL
35o451
0.1 /16 ^8 5
s.mm~
mu^LIrr
wzuc
50~3710~842-84
mxmuAL
359*51
ov/16v85
5n.00~_-_--._
ouxLzTY_w/mc_
�
50~3710~842~84
nxwoxL
359451
01x16v85
14.81~
mJxLI7r
wzws
59~3710~8*2~84'-----
- - nxwoxL
359*51
01 /16/85
29°53~
moxLIrY1
uYwc
50-3 n*a n�
MANUAL
359451
_-'-
�1�,�v»� _-_-__--_-_--_
_~��-
--m���zrnL��wc__
-vxo
ms7v0V�zm4
''----
oup4sv
o1xva/m!
oo°np~,
ouxLIry
wzmc
50~ 3 710 maa ma
nxmuxL
� 359451
0-1/16v85
35°52~
noxLzrm
uzmc
50~3710~862~86
w4muxL
-�
� w *
4 6
5.44-
1965iCI
= EDINA
01 -21 -85 E 35
AMOUNT_ _.
CHECK N0.
DATE
359451
01/16/85
359451
01/16/85
359451
01/16195
359451
01/16/85
359451
D-1/16/85
359451
01/16/85
359451
61/16/85
359451
01/16/85
359451
0.1/16/85
359451
01/16/85
350451
01/16/85
359451
01/16/85
359451
01/16/85
359451
01/16/85
359451
JA /16/85
359451
01/16/85
J
9
P
• •....
359540
359 540
359540
359 540
359540
359 540
J.1/16/85
5.44-
CHECK RE ER
CITY
01 -21 -85 E 35
AMOUNT_ _.
__. VENDOR _- __.._ITE_M_DESCRIPTI.ON _____.-
.,__ACCOUNT -NO. INV..-
•__P.0. -N MESSAGE
049-
QUALITY:
WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
15.98-
QUALITY
WINS _ _ .._
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
2.94-
QUALITY
WIN=
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
554.81
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
11.86-
OUALITY
WINE
_50- 4626- 842 -84_._ -_
_ MANUAL
29654.43
QUALITY,
_. ____•. . -__-
WINE
_
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
39799.15
OJALITV
WINE
50 -4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
177.58
QUALITY
MINE -
-- 50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
369.41
OUALITV
WINE _
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
294.00
QJALITY
WIN--
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
740.75
QUALITY
MIN=
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
19475.44
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
24.50
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
147.0O
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
19176.29
QJALITY,
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
19614.50
QUALITY,
WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
139336.86 •
1.
••• -CKS
J.1/16/85
5.44-
TWIN
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
01/16/85
1.13-
TWIN
CITY
WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
01/16/85
212.04
TWIN
CI +TY
WINE
__....___..__ _. ... 50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
01/16/85
4.53
_
TWIN
CITY
WINE
_._.._.
50- 4628.842 -84
MANUAL
01/16/85
090
TWIN
CITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
01/16/85
51.88
TWIN
CITY
WINE
_ _._ 50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
322.85
•• +• +♦
+•+ -CKS
171966F.73
FUND
10
TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
49823.71
FUVD
20
TOTAL
PARK FUND
49003.54
FUVD
23
TOTAL
ART CENTER _
15.75
FUND
26
TOTAL
SWIMMING POOL FUN)
39109.90
FUND
27
TOTAL
GOLF COURSE FUND
149185.50
FUND
28
TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER FUND
46998
FUND
29
TOTAL
GUN RANGE FUND
6,509.76
FUND
30
TOTAL
WATER FUND
119168.48
FUND
40
TOTAL
UTILITY FUND
3529175.79
FUND
50
TOTAL
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
29281.37
FUND
50
TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION FUND
568 9988'.51
T OT4 L
-
c "- / 1i /Gf
AGENDA
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
JANUARY 21, 1985
7:00 P.M.
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
ROLLCALL
MINUTES OF January 7, 1985, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of ,
seconded by
I. Set Hearing Date
A. Property Disposition - Edinborough
B. Amendment to Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area Plan
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
PRESENTATION OF COMMUNITY SERVICE AWARD - Del Edwards
MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of November 5, December 3 and 17, and Special Meeting
of December 28, 1984, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of ,
seconded by
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. First Reading of
Zoning Ordinance requires offering of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall
vote to pass Second Reading or if Second Reading should be waived. Lot{ Divisions,
Plats, Appeals from Administrative or Board of Appeals and Adjustments decisions
require action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass.
A. Zoning Change
1. Second Reading
a. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to MD -5 Mixed Development District,
Edinborough - Generally located west _of York Avenue and south of
West 76th Street (Contd from 1/7/85) (Continue to-2/11/85)
2. First Reading
a. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to POD -2 Planned Office District -
Opus Corporation /Normandale Golf Inc.
B.' Preliminary Plat
1. Camelot West - Opus Corporation /Normandale Golf Inc.
C. Final Development Plan
1. Edina Family Care Clinic - Generally located East of Vernon Avenue
and north of Link Road
D•. Set Hearing Date
1. Amendment to Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area Plan
II. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
III. AWARD OF BIDS
A. Grading of Van Valkenburg Park
B. Indianhead Lake Treatments
C. Repair Roof - Swimming Pool Bathhouse
IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of January 15, 1985
B. West 70th Street Report
C. Board /Commission Appointments
D. Appointment to State CHS Advisory Committee
E. Feasibility Report - Tree Trimming Project TT -03 - Set Hearing Date
F. On -Sale Wine:-License Report
G. Revision of 8/6/84 Council Minutes - Easement Vacation for Lot 6, Block 1,
The Habitat
H; Project Approval & Authorization to Take Bids
1 .1. Hansen Well Redevelopment
2. Bridge Redecking - Valley View Road /Soo..Line Railroad.
I• Solid Waste'Management
J. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council
K. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items
1. Traffic Safety Committee & Speed Awareness Program - January 28
Agenda
Edina City Council
Page Two
V. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass.
A. Resolution Authorizing Participation in the Control Data Joint Comparable
Worth Study
VI. ORDINANCES. First Reading requires offering of Ordinance only. 3/5 favorable
rollcall vote to pass Second Reading. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass
if Second Reading waived.
A. First Reading (Waive Second Reading)
1. Ordinance No. 171 -A19 - To Correct Fee for Ventilation Work Permit
VII. FINANCE
A. Liquor Fund Report as of October 31, 1984
B. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by for payment of
the following Claims as per Pre -List dated 1/21/85: General Fund $171,667.73,
Park Fund $4,823.71, Art Center $4,003.54, Swimming Pool Fund $15.75, Golf
Course Fund $3,109.90, Recreation Center Fund $14,185.50, Gun Range Fund
$46.98, Waterwork Fund $6,509.76, Utility Fund $10,168.48, Liquor
Dispensary Fund $352,175.79, .Construction Fund $2,281.37, Total $568,988.51