HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-03-18_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MARCH 18, 1985
7:00 P.M.
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
ROLLCALL
MINUTES of February 4, 1985, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of ,
seconded by
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
FLAG CEREMONY - Camp Fire Troop No. 263
PROCLA4ATION - Camp Fire Week
EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION - Harold Schwartz
MINUTES of the Regular Meetings of February 4 and 25, 1985, approved as submitted
or corrected by motion of seconded by
I. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by City Manager. Spectators heard. If Council wishes to proceed,
action by Resolution.' 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass if improvement has
been petitioned for; 4/5 vote required if no petition.
A. Tree Trimming Improvement -No. P -TT -03
Area bounded by Crosstown Highway on the South, the Northern Boundary line
on the North, Highway 100 on the East and the Western Boundary Line (County
Road 18) on the West. -
B. Wooddale School Site/Utley Park /W. 50th Street (Contd from 2/4/85)
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. First Reading of
Zoning Ordinance requires offering of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall
vote to pass Second Reading or if Second Reading should be waived. Lot Divisions, .
Plats, Appeals from Administrative or Board of Appeals and Adjustments decisions
require action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass.
A. Zoning Change
1. First Reading
a. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -3 Planned Residential
District - Brutger Companies - Generally located west of Cahill
Road and south of Dewey Hill Road (Continue to 3/25/85)
B. Final Plat Approval
1. Dennis Miller Addition - Generally located north of Grove Street and
east of Johnson Drive
C; Lot Division
1. Lot 5, Block 1, The Habitat - 6505 -07 Waterford Court
D.' Set Hearing Dates (3/25/85)
1. Preliminary Plat - Interlachen Heights - Generally located west of
Ridge Road and north and south of Interlachen Boulevard
2. Zoning Change - R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PSR -4 Planned
Senior Citizen District - Generally located south of Interlachen
Boulevard, west of Summit Avenue and north of Vernon Avenue
3. CDBG:-Program Proposed Budget for Year XI (4/1/85)
III. PUBLIC HEARING ON DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT VACATIONS. Affidavits of Notice
by Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. If Council wishes
to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass.
A. Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement - Lot 22, Block 4, Lake Edina
2nd Addition
B. Vacation of Utility Easement - Lot 2, Block 1, Warden Acres Peterson Replat
IV. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
V. AWARD OF BIDS
A. Tree Trimming - Improvement No. TT -03
B. Toro Groundmaster
C. Trucks, Cars and Sweeper
Agenda
Edina City Council
March 18, 1985
Page Two
VI. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Boards /Commissions Appointments - Council Liasion (Contd from 2/25/85)
B. Corporate Report 1984/85
C. Approval of Beer, Club and Sunday Liquor License Renewals
D. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council
E. Post Agenda-and Manager's Miscellaneous Items
1. City Hall Space Study Committee - Members
VII. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass.
A. France Avenue /494 Project - Expenditure of State Aid Funds
B. France Avenue /494 Project - Final Plan Approval
VIII. ORDINANCES. First Reading requires offering of Ordinance only. 3/5 favorable
rollcall vote to pass Second Reading. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass
if Second Reading waived.
A. First Reading
1. Ordinance No. 902 -A1 - To Allow Sales of Wine Only in Qualifying
Restaurants
IX. FINANCE
A. Liquor Fund Report as of December 31, 1984
B. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by for payment
of the following claims as per Pre -List dated 3/18/85: General Fund $267,307.77,
Art Center $7,005.34, Golf Course Fund $15,525.98, Recreation Center Fund
$1,939.28, Utility Fund $6,561.93, Liquor Dispensary Fund $71,665.67, Con-
- struction Fund $5,953.50, Total $375,959.47 and for confirmation of payment
of the following claims dated 3/4/85: General Fund $37,946.31, Art Center
$246.32, Golf Course Fund $2.53, Recreation Center Fund $637.41, Utility
Fund $19,964.00, Liquor Dispensary Fund $282.92, Construction Fund $360.00,
Total $59,439.49
MINUTES. -
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
FEBRUARY 4, 198..5. -- - =-
Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, and.Mayor-
Courtney• -
MINUTES of January 21, 1985, were approved as submitted by motion bf Member
Kelly, seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried. --
There being no further business, the meeting was.adjourned.by motion of Member
Kelly, seconded by Member Turner. Motion c ried. -
Gordon IA Hughes.
Executi Director
a
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
FEBRUARY 4, 1985
Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor
Courtney.
PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON WOODDALE SCHOOL SITE /UTLEY PARK /W. 50TH STREET; REPORT
OF CONSULTANT PRESENTED. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved
and ordered placed on file. Mayor Courtney advised that Member Fred Richards
would chair this portion of the meeting. Member Richards then indicated the
procedure for the hearing and the order of presentations. He stated that the
the consulting firm of Bennett, Ringrose, Wolsfeld, Jarvis, Gardner, Inc., (BRW)
had made excellent presentations of.their report regarding the subject property
at the two informational meetings held on January 8 and 15 at the Wooddale School
for all interested persons, and that this formal public hearing was being held so
that the Council could receive the report of the consultant, together with the
recommendations of the staff, the advisory boards /commissions, the Edina Historical
Society, the Wooddale Neighborhood Council and input from the general public. He
suggested that the hearing then be continued to the meeting of March 4, 1985,
to allow the Council time to review and consider all reports and comments submitted.
Assistant City Manager Bernhardson presented background information advising that
when the City and the School District negotiated the sale of the Wooddale School
site it was the intent of the Council that a study be undertaken to determine the
direction for the school building and the site. Additionally, it was felt that
the park area around the building should also be part of the study together with
W. 50th Street which is deteriorating and is under consideration for improvement
including related sanitary sewer and storm sewer work. Finally, Utley Park was
added to the study to allow for flexibility in studying the Wooddale School site
And W. 50th Street. Mr. Peter Jarvis, of the firm of BRW, then gave oral summaries
of their written report entitled "Evaluation of Alternatives for: West 50th'Street,
Wooddale School Building, Wooddale School Site and Utley Park ". With regard to
the Wooddale School building he stated that the charge given by the Council was to
evaluate the structure from a physical standpoint and to look at alternatives,
each to stand on its own merit, and to evaluate those alternatives. Presented were:
Alternative A - Maintain the entire structure as it now exists. Would provide
approximately 43,000 useable s.f. that could.be rented to prospective tenants.
Estimated baseline renovation costs: $524,000 and annual maintenance of $204,000.
Complete renovation and restoration costs: $1,028,000 and annual maintenance
cost of $204,000. Alternative B - Maintain the original building as constructed
in 1936 with demolition of northerly addition. Would provide approximately
23,000-useable s.f. Estimated baseline renovation cost: $470,000 and annual
maintenance of $131,000. Complete renovation and restoration costs: $771,000 and
annual maintenance cost of $131,000. Alternative C - Maintain the legitimate
historic facade facing W. 50th Street, with demolition of the auditorium and
adjacent classrooms. Would provide approximately 17,000 useable s.f. Estimated
baseline renovation cost: $389,000 and annual maintenance of $72,000. Complete
renovation and restoration costs: $528,000 and annual maintenance of $72,000.
Alternative D - Maintain the central entry of the building as a monument with
demolition of the structure. Would provide approximately 480 useable s.f.
Estimated monument renovation and restoration costs: $245,000 (includes demolition)
and annual maintenance cost of $2,000. Alternative E - Total demolition of
building with conversion of entire site to a neighborhood park. Estimated
building demolition and backfill costs: $175,000. Mr. Jarvis advised that the
charge given by the Council with regard to the parks was to look at alternatives
not only for the north side of W. 50th Street, which is integral to the school
solution, but also to Utley Park on the south.side of.W. 50th Street, adjacent
to Minnehaha Creek. He noted that the Council must make a decision with respect
to the school before a final decision can be made regarding the park to the north
of W. 50th Street. Five alternatives for the parks were presented: Alternative A -
Largest impact to park area to the north by maintaining the school in its present
configuration. Provides a parking lot on the site to accomodate building useage.
Reduces available recreational space from 5.3 acres to 1.8 acres. For Utley Park
a lagoon and island would be created off Minnehaha Creek with other changes being
minimal. Access would be off W. 50th Street. Alternative B - Significant
structural change to school building with reduction in parking lot area. Would
permit construction of a football /soccer field and hard surface game area north
of the building. For Utley Park there is a slight restructuring of the surface
parking; the other uses are fundamentally the same. Alternative C - School building
would be cut back to the historic facade. Parking lot would be located to the north
of the structure. Would permit expansion of the multi - purpose turf area to include
a softball diamond as well as a football /soccer field. Formal landscaping would
set off the facade of the school structure. For Utley Park the possibility exists
to move the Grange Hall and the old Cahill School from Tupa Park to an historic
area in the westerly portion. Alternative D - School site would retain the
2/4/85
i
central entry of the building as a monument, with remainder of building demolished.
Parking lot would be smaller. Formal landscaping to enhance the monument, and
slightly larger turf area. For Utley Park the historic building cluster would be
restructured to the east. The lagoon and island remain as proposed. Alterna-
tive E - Site plan retains no portion of the school building. Parking lot is
accessed off Wooddale. Tot lot to the north, multi - purpose court area and a
slightly enlarged turf area. For Utley Park a reconfigured parking lot accessed
off Wooddale- Avenue. All park alternatives have in common a proposed pedestrian
underpass at the westerly end. Mr. Jarvis stated that the charge given by the
Council for W. 50th Street was to look at the entire corridor from Highway 100
east to Halifax Avenue, the westerly terminus of the 50th and France redevelop-
ment project area. He noted that W. 50th Street is classified as a minor arterial,
serving between 14,000 and 20,000 vehicles per day. The volumes and functions of
the street break at Wooddale Avenue. The character of the street east of Wooddale
Avenue is primarily residential and west of Wooddale is more open and institutional.
-Alternatives for W. 50th Street from Highway 100 to Wooddale Avenue were:
Alternative A - Reconstruct the street at the existing 40 ft. width, with improved
sight distance at Eden Avenue, improved geometrics at: Wooddale Avenue to provide
left turn lanes, with sidewalk both sides. Alternative B - Would widen the street
to 52 ft. width, create a narrow median to provide a protected left turn lane at
Wooddale, with spot medians to define left turns. Alternative C - Street would
function the same as in Alternative B. Width -would be 68 ft. and constructed as
a parkway design with a wider median at the parks. Alternative D - The street
would be narrowed to 28 feet except at intersections for construction of left
turn lanes. Alternative D1 - A curve of the roadway to the north at the park area
would relocate more land to Utley Park. Alternative D2 - A curve of the roadway
to the south at the park area would relocate more land to the school site area.
Alternatives for W. 50th Street from Wooddale Avenue to Halifax Avenue were:
Alternative A - Reconstruct the street at the existing 40 ft. width, with improve-
ments in terms of width at the Wooddale intersections and a parking bay at
St. Stephens church. Alternative B - Would widen the street to 46 ft. to allow
four moving lanes of traffic at all times. Alternative C - Street would be
40 ft. wide, with painted lines to delineate two moving lanes except at all
major intersections where left turn lanes are provided. Alternative D - Street
would be narrowed to a 28 ft. width except with improvements at Wooddale Avenue
for left turn lanes. Alternative E - Street would be narrowed to a 28 ft. width
except for the major intersections of Wooddale, Arden and the entrance to the
bank where left turn lanes would be constructed. All alternatives include lower-
ing the West 50th Street grade at Eden Avenue and intersection alignment changes
at Eden Avenue and Browndale Avenue. Mr. Jarvis pointed out that an important
side effect of the Council's policy decision on these alternatives is the ulti-
mate financing, and that certain standards are required by the Minnesota Depart-
ment of Transportation (MNDot) to be met if State Aid monies are to be used for
the reconstruction of the street. In the opinion of BRW, a variance request
approach for W. 50th Street east of Wooddale Avenue is the appropriate.approach.
Planner Gordon Hughes advised that an objective,.professional opinion and joint
consultant /.staff recommendation has been drafted on the alternatives as shown
in the consultant's study of West 50th Street /Wooddale School Building /Wooddale
School Site /Utley Park. He noted that from a staff standpoint, the opinion is
not unanimous because of the disciplines involved from a park, engineering and
planning standpoint and in those differences the City Manager has "cut the knot ".
School Recommendation: Staff recommends Alternate E (total demolition); the
consultant recommends Alternate D (monument). Reasons.: 1) Provides needed open
space and neighborhood park, 2) costs of renovation and operation for public
uses are too great, 3) Major public renters of building not present, and 4) un-
desirable to split public uses between Community Center and Wooddale School.
Park Recommendation: Staff /consultant recognize that the park element is the most
schematic of the three issue areas. Depends on programming of the park and the
funding available. Key Elements: 1) Pedestrian underpass at the creek, 2) Skating/
canoe lagoon, 3) Improved parking areas, 4) Tot lot, 5) Game court and 6) General
field space. Secondary Element: Investigation of relocation of Grange Hall and
Cahill School. Based on those elements and the recommendation for Wooddale School,
Alternative E is recommended for Wooddale Park; Alternative C is recommended for
Utley Park. West 50th Street Recommendation: Staff /consultant found the review
of West 50th Street the most difficult. The Study makes a distinction between
the east of Wooddale segment and the West of Wooddale segment. Key Factors:
1) Significant change in traffic volumes at Wooddale, 2) East segment more
"collector like" - West segment more "arterial like ", 3) Significant change in
appearance of roadway at Wooddale, 4) Change in neighborhood characteristics,
and 5) Trees. Alternate C.is recommended for the T.H. 100 to Wooddale segment,
providing four 12 foot lanes, protected left turn lanes and a parkway design
with wide, landscaped medians. Reasons: 1) Provides design which is compatible
with functional classification, 2) Allows parkway design which will reduce speed,
enhance aesthics, and 3) Fundable through State Aid. Alternate A is recommended
r 2/4/85..
for the Wooddale to Halifax segment, with reconstruction at the existing 40 ft.
width. Reasons: 1) Preserve as many trees as
possible, 2) Provides a
design
which is more collector like ins function, and
3) More compatible with
neighbor -
hood characteristics. Mr. Hughes pointed out
that other improvements
are pro-
posed to be constructed with the roadway: a)
underground power lines,
b) parking
bay along the Church, c) some sanitary sewer
and storm sewer upgrading, and
d) leave sidewalks in present locations and rebuild
where necessary.
Mr. Hughes
then presented staff's recommendation for funding
as follows:
-.Proposed.Wooddale School and Park Budget
(City Funds)
Costs
Demolition
$175,000
Improvements
100,000
Tot lot
Parking (Portion assessed)
Game courts
Field area
Basic landscaping
$275,000
Source of Funds
Proceeds from School District
$ 75,000
Park Budget
100,000
1985 Capital Improvements Budget
.100,000
$275,000
Items Funded by Others
Canoe Landing /Skating Lagoon - Watershed
District
Unfunded Future Items
Relocation of Grange Hall & Cahill
School
Additional Landscaping
West 50th Street Improvement
Costs
T.H. 100 to Wooddale
$714,000
Pedestrian underpass
60,000
Wooddale to Halifax.
411,000
Underground power lines
300,000
Street lighting
100,000
Landscaping
85,000
$1,670,000
Source of Funds .
If State Aid Variance is Granted
State Aid
Utility Fund
City Participation in curb and
Customary Assessment to abuttii
Watershed Participation
Assessment to others
for Wooddale to Halifax:
$1,069,000
21,300
gutter 100,000
.1g owners 160,000
20,000
299,700
If State Aid Variance is Denied:
State Aid $ 705,000
Utility Fund 21,300
City Participation in curb and gutter 100,000
Customary Assessment to abutting owners 160,000
Watershed Participation 20,000
Assessment to- others 663,700
Member Richards then called for a presentation of recommendations of the Edina
Heritage Preservation Board. Foster Dunwiddie, President of the Board,.stated
that the primary charge from the Council to the Board is to study and investigate
land and buildings within the City to be considered for preservation. Following
a 1979 city -wide survey of sites considered to be of historic and architechural
significance, the Country Club District was nominated to the National Register
ofiHistoric Places and subsequently was placed on the National Register with
Wooddale School listed as a pivotal structure. In 1983 the Board again reviewed
the Wooddale School and recommended that the School be rezoned to Heritage
Preservation District. Tom Martinson, charter member of the Board, summarized
the written report of the Edina Heritage Preservation Board to the Council. He
pointed out that the school building is a handsome building, structurally very
sound, with substantial value as real estate. Rehabilitation and restor
existing,buildings is the strongest single real estate market in the United States
today. Based upon the current shell value of $20 /s.f. for existing buildings, it
has a current value, exclusive of land of $1,360,000 for 68,000 s.f. of space.
The building can be brought to modern standards for about one - third the cost of
constructing similar new space. He referred to an operating pro forma of Wood-
dale as.rental property, which the Board had prepared, which illustrated that
2/4/85
the "net cash flow" is an initial breakeven, with a rapid climb into profitability.
For public uses alone, the Board believes there are ample candidates for tenancy:
park activities, community theater, senior citizen center, and so on. The School
Board's revisionary clause appears to be a non -issue as it is the School Board
position to never again use the building for educational purposes, the site is
apparently below minimum state standards for a new structure and a 90 -day notice
would effectively prohibit any investment to the property in.perpetiuty. The
Heritage Preservation Board's recommendation to the Council was summarized by
Mr. Martinson as follows: 1) The Board has taken no position on choices with
respect to street, school and parklands which do not directly affect the National
Register District; 2) As to the roadway section, the Board concurs with neighbor-
hood sentiment that whatever is done to 50th Street, east of Wooddale, boulevard
sidewalks should be retained on both sides of the street and the boulevard trees
should not be removed; underground routing of utility lines would be very desirable;
3) As to Wooddale School, the Board's position as to the historic and physical
importance of the building is well known. The Board.would be unable to recommend
demolition and would recommend to the Council Alternative "A ", retention of the
structure. The Board also believes that the neighborhood is underserved with respect
to active recreational area and that the opportunity to provide playing fields north
of 50th Street is very desirable; therefore, the Board further recommends that staff
provide an analysis of current parking use at the Community Center as the Board
believes that actual parking requirements by code are significantly greater than
what can be experienced when the building is put to productive public use. Should
the Council conclude that required parking will preclude the construction of a play-
ing field, then the Board would support Alternative "B ", retention of the 1926
building, with site development as generally illustrated by the consultant. Joan
Lonsbury, Chair of the Edina Park Board, advised that all members of the Board
had attended the informational meetings on Wooddale School which were held in
January, and at their meeting of January 22 the Board had reviewed the alternatives
which had been presented by the consultant. On a final ballot the Board voted
unanimously to recommend to the City Council that the Wooddale School be razed in
its entirety (Alternative E) and that the site be utilized for optimum park purposes.
The Park Board also recommended that the old Cahill School and the Grange Hall not
be moved to Utley Park. With regard to the proposed lagoon for Utley Park, the
Board had no recommendation. Member Richards then asked if the Community Develop-
ment and Planning Commission had made a recommendation. Mr. Hughes stated that
the Commission has not reviewed the consultant's proposals; that. the last time
the matter was on their agenda was about a year ago when the Commission recommended
that Wooddale School be rezoned to the Heritage Preservation District. Donna
Skagerberg then presented a letter from the Edina Historical Society.regarding
the Wooddale School. In summary,the Society's firm position is that Wooddale School
should be preserved in its entirety and at the very minimum the auditorium area be
retained in any plan that may be adopted. It is of historic significance that the
building is designated as a pivital structure in the Country Club Historic.Preser-
vation District which is on the National Register of Historic Places. If the old
Cahill School and Grange Hall buildings are moved, they too will be removed from
the historic sites list. The Society's research of possible.uses for the building
revealed the following: 1) That the Community Center is completely in use, with
a waiting list, and that the greater share of the facility is school or business
oriented and not used for "community" activities; 2) That the South Hennepin
Health and Human Services are interested .in setting -up a satellite office in the
building to serve the growing needs of the elderly in Edina; 3) That there is
need of space for the performing arts groups in Edina; and 4).Concern as.to.where
the things presently being housed in the building would go. Speaking in behalf
of the Wooddale Neighborhood Council was Joe Price, 4407 Country Club Road. He
presented the following recommendations of the Council: 1) Maximize the passive
green (park) space by razing the Wooddale School building (Alternative E) as the
most economical and reasonable alternative for the taxpayers to bear; and 2) With
regard to West 50th Street, the Council recommends that it not be widened or
narrowed but to resurface and repave it with minor operational improvements such
as turn lanes. With respect to State Aid funding, the Neighborhood Council
requests that the City Council seek a variance from the standard requirements_so
that State Aid funds can be used for the street improvement. Mr. Price then
presented petitions representing signatures of approximately 423 Country Club
area residents who are in favor of razing the school building and neither widen-
ing or narrowing 50th Street. He also advised that he had an additional 98 names
of residents outside of the area who are in agreement with their position.
Marilyn Curtis, 4400 W. 50th Street, pointed out that she and at least four other
residents of the Wooddale neighborhood had not been advised of the Wooddale
Neighborhood Council meeting nor asked for their input. Arthur Heiam, 5020 Arden
Avenue, asked if there is no future for Wooddale School for possible school use.
He stated further that he has talked with a number of people who agree with him
that the school should not be razed, and further, that if the street is amended
in any way that would result in the loss of the trees, it would result in loss of
2/4/85
property values for the area. Jack Ritchie, 4627 Browndale Avenue, stated that the
bridge over the millpond dam is a dangerous area and that he felt the road really
should go down into 50th Street rather than across that bridge and that the issue
should be addressed. Nancy Atchison, Chairman of the School Board, responded that
the Board had agonized a long time over their decision for Wooddale School. She
advised that projections show that there is adequate space for educational purposes
over the next ten years in existing buildings now in use for elementary and secondary
grades. Paul Marx, 4921 E. Sunnyslope Road, expressed his concern for residents of
E. Sunnyslope Road gaining access onto W. 50th Street and asked that the street not
be narrowed. Jim Purcell, 4518 Wooddale Avenue, stated that he was opposed to
narrowing or any change of 50th Street that would route addtional traffic down Wood -
dale!Avenue. Brooke Nasby, 4908 W. Sunnyslope Road, advised that there is a new
group of residents between 25/35 years of age which are moving into the area and
there will be a need for the Wooddale School in future years when these residents
begin to rear children. John Skagerberg, 6101.Killarny Lane, presented petitions
signed by residents in the Wooddale School area who support retaining the school
building. Sue Walling, 5015 Wooddale Lane, stated that she was in favor of preserv-
ing the Wooddale School for future generations as part of the historical heritage
of Edina. Regarding 50th Street, Mrs. Walling stated it should not be changed.
GregINasby, 4908 W. Sunnyslope Road, felt that school needs projections for the area
should be for a longer period and that the site should be preserved for future
school needs in the area. W. L. Tallakson, 4501 Morningside Road, spoke in support
of retaining the Wooddale School building and stated he felt there were tenants who
would be interested in leasing it. William Jacoby, 4507 Browndale Avenue, spoke in
support of Alternative B for Wooddale School, stating that he felt that tearing
the entire building down will not provide any more useable park space'that exists
there now. Janie Paulus, 4617 Moorland Avenue, raised the question that if the
building were rented out that the tenants' -use be compatible with the use of neigh-
borhood children for the park area and that safety was a factor to consider. Tom
Beckey, 4903 Arden Avenue, pointed out that the only park available to his family
was across 50th Street and that therefore he advocated keeping 50th Street as it
exists now so as not to increase the traffic, that he favored making as much park
space available as possible and that the trees along 50th Street should be preserved
and treated so that they would not succumb to Dutch Elm disease. No further comment
or questions were heard. Member. Richards commented that the presentations by the
consultant and staff were excellent; that this was a very difficult decision for
the Council to make and that come of the comments made tonight were heard for the
first time. He recommended that the hearing be continued until the first meeting
in March to allow the Council Members time to review and digest all the material
presented. He pointed out that all correspondence addressed to the Council as a
whole or individually has been copied and furnished to the entire Council, and that
anyone who has not had the opportunity to make his /her comments known should get
any ,material to the City Clerk by February 26 so that it can be reproduced and
included in the Council packets for the March 4, 1985 meeting. Mayor Courtney
moved that the public hearing be continued to the meeting of March 4, 1985:
Member Richards clarified that the sense of the motion is that at the March 4
meeting the Council Members would express their viewpoints on the three separate
but related issues and begin the decision process for concept approval. Member
Bredesen pointed out that the issue of State Aid funding for the improvement to
50th Street is no small item and that it could cost the City approximately one
million dollars if we receive no State Aid funds, and that the monies may then
come from the immediate neighborhood. Therefore, any,decision regarding 50th
Street should recognize the consequence of that. Member Bredesen asked that the
residents of the area consider the funding issue and express to the Council their
willingness to support some of the cost if the Council elects an ".option which would
notiqualify for State Aid funds.
Motion was seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR 1985 CUSHMAN. Mr. Bernhardson presented tabluation of bids for a
1985 Cushman Model No. 53085 to be used at the Braemar Golf Course, showing Cushman
Motor Company at $6,476.15 and Horst Distributing at $7,225.00. Member Turner's
motion for award of bid to low,bidder, Cushman Motor Company, at $6,476.15 was
seconded by Member Bredesen.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR JACOBSEN GREENS KING IV. Mr. Bernhardson presented bids for one
Jacobsen Greens King IV for the Braemar Golf Course, showing R. L. Goulds and Company
at $7,745.00 and Toro Company at $7,905.00. Member Bredesen's motion for award of
bid to low bidder, R. L. Goulds and Company, at $7,745.00 was seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
2/4/85
CITY HALL SPACE STUDY DISCUSSED. Mr. Bernhardson referred to the base information
compiled by staff with regard to the City Hall Space Study which had previously
been furnished the Council Members and asked for comment. Member Turner stated
that the information was.an excellent first step in response to discussion by the
Council at last year's budget meetings and that she would hope the Council would
proceed to appointing a committee to explore the other issues involved. Member
Bredesen responded that the Council needs to understand what our space needs are,
what the options are, what it would cost to move and what this property might be
worth. Member Turner suggested that the Council proceed to draft a charge to the
committee and try to appoint the committee members at the Council Meeting of
February 25, 1985. It was informally agreed to proceed as suggested.
ON -SALE BEER LICENSE APPROVED FOR BRAVO! ITALIAN SPECIALTIES, 4926 FRANCE AV. SO.
Mr. Bernhardson advised that an On -Sale Beer License application has been received
from Bravo! Italian Specialties, 4926 France Avenue So., which is a new enterprise
scheduled to open approximately March 1. He noted that they.have submitted a
letter requesting waiver of the ordinance requirement that no license shall be
granted to any business that has not been in operation at the location for at
least six months preceding such application. The ordinance provides that the
Council may waive said requirement by a 4/5 vote. Antonio Cecconi, President of
Bravo! Italian Specialties, was present and explained that the waiver is requested
so that they can initally present the restaurant to customers as it will be opera-
ting. He stated that.they do not expect that beer sales will exceed 5 to 8% of
gross food sales of the restaurant, that it will specialize in Italian foods,
mainly pizza, fresh pasta and sandwiches and that beer would compliment that type
of food. Roberta Castellano, 4854 France Avenue So., stated she objected to the
approval of the license because it would have a detrimental effect on her neighbor-
hood. Discussion followed regarding the ordinance requirement that a business
must be in operation for at least six months preceding an application for On -Sale
Beer License. Mr. Bernhardson stated that the provision was in the old ordinance
and no rational could be determined for the requirement. Member Bredesen moved
approval of issuance of an On -Sale Beer License to Bravo! Italian Specialties,
with waiver of the six months requirement. Motion was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Nayes: Kelly
Mayor Courtney asked that staff review the ordinance requirement and make a
recommendation as to whether it should remain or be removed from the ordinance.
REPORT GIVEN ON MLC 1985 LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM. Member Richards referred to the
1985 Legislative Platform developed by the Municipal.Legislative Commission .(MLC)
and commented that the City is benefitting by membership in the MLC. He pointed
out that the key issue being considered is the Local Government Aid Distribution
Formula. There is no concensus among the members on how it should be dealth with
but he urged the Council Members to review the MLC's position on the issue so
that input can be relayed to the Commission before its next meeting. Member
Turner noted that the MLC's position on solid waste management was in conflict
with that of the Metropolitan Council and with that of the Edina Recycling Com-
mission who supports the position of the Council. Member Richards confirmed that
the MLC opposes the legislation proposed by the Council because it philosophically
believes that voluntary programs should be implemented and that only if compliance
is not achieved through a voluntary program should mandatory recycling be considered.
No formal action was taken:
ADVISORY BOARD /COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS APPROVED. As recommended by Mayor Courtney,
Member Kelly's motion was seconded by Member Turner, for appointment of the
following persons to the various advisory boards and commissions: Community
Development & Planning Commission (term to 2- 1 -88); Helen McClelland, John M. Palmer,
and David T. Runyan; Edina Park Board (term to 2- 1 -88): Joan Lonsbury, John M. Thayer
and Marilyn Wooldridge; Board of Appeals and Adjustments: Michael Lewis for term
to 2 -1 -88, Rose -mary Utne for term to 2 -1 -87 and James Bentley for term to 2 -1 -86;
Building Construction Appeals Board (term to 2- 1 -88): Bruce C. Bermel and A. Thomas
Wurst; Edina Human Relations Commission (term to 2- 1 -88): Joe Cavanaugh, Canny
Wright, John L. Senior, Jr. and Lynne Westphal; Edina Recycling Commission (term
to 2- 1 -86): Virginia Bodine and Nancy Grimsby; Edina Heritage Preservation Board
(term to 2- 1 -87): John C. Childs, Thomas Martinson and Lois Wilder; Advisory
Board of Health (term to 2- 1 -87): Holly Branch, Effie McKerson, Dr. Stephen
Sinykin, Dr. Walter Wilder, June Schmidt, Dr. Sharon Aadalon, Virginia McCollister
and Margaret Rash; Edina Art Center Committee (term to 2- 1 -88): Harriet Bach,
Sandra Clark, Betty Paugh and James Van Valkenburg; South Hennepin Human Services
Council (term to 2- 1 -87): Leslie Turner and Betty Danielson.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
2,%4/85:.
Member Kelly asked if there were any rules as to how many times a person could
be reappointed to the same Board or Commission and commented that perhaps there
should be some limitation to enable new appointments. It was agreed to discuss
the matter again at some future, meeting.
P
LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT FOR METROPOLITAN AREA DISCUSSED. Mr. Bernhardson advised that
Mrs. Alison Fuhr, Edina's representative to the Light Rail Transit Board, had asked
for input from the Council Members of the communities she represents as to their
position with regard to the proposed light rail transit routes for the metropolitan
area. Member Richards commented that he felt the Council would benefit from a
presentation by someone knowledgeable about the issues of light rail transit. It
was informally agreed that such a presentation should be arranged for a future
meeting. Mayor Courtney said he would make those arrangements.
ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTOR APPOINTED FOR 1985. As recommended, Member Bredesen's
motion was seconded by Member Richards, reappointing Eugene Davis as Assistant Weed
Inspector for the year 1985.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
MIGRATORY WATER FOWL DISCUSSED. Mr. Bernhardson recalled that the City has had
complaints from residents regarding the migratory water fowl which remain in the
City year around in areas where there is open water. In an attempt to encourage
migration, the City posted signs in specified areas requesting residents to not feed
the water fowl. As a follow -up, staff has discussed the problem with the Department
bf.Wildlife, University of Minnesota, with regard to the possibility of moving the
birds. They have proposed to study and count the birds over the next five years
for a-:-fee of $3,600 per year.. As a part of that.in 1985 and 1986 they would remove
the.birds to Oklahoma and Kansas where their flight wings would be clipped. In 1987
and 1988 there would be removal of eggs from nests to limit the population within
parameters they have specified. Staff feels this is a good direction to go in an
attempt to reduce and manage the number of birds in Edina. Member Turner stated she
would support the proposal if staff felt it was not an over - reaction to the problem.
Member Richards stated he would not vote to spend public funds for the project
because it is a matter of individual perception. Following brief discussion,
Mr. Bernhardson advised that staff would moniter the water fowl population this
summer and bring the issue back to Council if the problem intensified. No action
was taken.
STOREFRONT /YOUTH ACTION EXPENDITURE DISCUSSED. Member Kelly questioned the claim..
amount paid to Storefront /Youth Action and asked what service was provided for that.
Ms. Ceil Smith explained that this is the monthly expenditure which the City contracts
for to provide youth counseling services by the Chemical Helath Coordinator at
Storefront /Youth Action. No action was taken.
CABLE TV SERVICE AND CHARGES DISCUSSED. Member Bredesen made reference to a letter
which had been sent to the Council Members from Mark Benson, 6389 Barrie Road, in
which he expressed his frustration with the service level being provided by Rogers
Cablesystems. Member Bredesen commented that he had also experienced problems in
making contact with their office and strongly objected to being told there would be
a $10.00 fee for dropping the cable service. He pointed out that such a fee was
never a part of the program when it was sold to subscribers and that although he
was willing to consider making concessions in the franchise agreement to help Rogers
Cablesystems through a difficult period, he could not do so until they behaved in a
fashion that was more effective and responsive to their subscribers. Mayor Courtney
agreed that the company was doing a poor job with regard to their billing procedures.
Mr. Bernhardson explained that there have been a series of problems within the.,
company which have resulted in numberous calls from subscribers complaining about
service and.the billing procedure which was further complicated by the company's
installation of a new billing system. He noted also that the FCC had come in and
said that local governments could no longer regulate rates. In response, Congress
came back in September and said that starting the first of the year all local rate
regulation was extended for two years. In that window, the company changed alot of
the subscriber rates and added the drop fee. Mr. Bernhardson noted that Rogers
Cablesystems will be making a presentation to the five City Councils within the
next few weeks to seek some relief from some of the franchise provisions. No action
was taken.
NEXT COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY 25, 1985 DUE TO PRESIDENTS' DAY. The
Council was reminded by Mr. Bernhardson that the next regular meeting will be on
Monday, February 25, due to the Presidents' Day holiday on February 20.
COUNCIL /LOCAL LEGISLATORS BREAKFAST MEETING RESCHEDULED FOR MARCH 8. Mr. Bernhardson
advised that the Council /Local Legislators breakfast meeting has been rescheduled
2/4/85
for March 8, 1985, at 7:30 a.m. at City Hall. Member Bredesen indicated he could
not attend.
EDINBOROUGH MEETING DATE LEFT OPEN. Mr. Bernhardson reminded the Council Members
that the tentative meeting on Edinborough which had been scheduled for February 11
has been postponed due to conflicts and that as recommended by staff the date has
been left open at the present time. No action was taken.
LIQUOR STORE OPERATIONS /BUSINESS STRATEGY PLAN NOTED. With regard to the Liquor
Store Operations /Business Strategy Plan which had been sent to the Council Members,
Mr. Bernhardson asked that it be reviewed and that the Council respond with their
comments or questions. No action was taken.
WATERMAIN BREAKS NOTED. Mr. Bernhardson informed the Council Members that five
watermain breaks had occurred today;.one on the St. Louis Park system and four
on the Edina system located as follows: Londonderry which has been repaired,
Kellog which has been repaired, Metro which is being worked on and the major break
of a 12" main at Olinger /Tracy with a water hammer which blew off the meters in
several of the houses resulting in water in those basements. He stated that the
insurance company has been alerted and that the City crews are out working on the
breaks. Cause of the multiple breaks has not been determined. No action was taken.
PUBLIC HEARING DATE SET FOR VACATIONS OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS. As
recommended by staff, Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION CALLING ON PUBLIC HEARINGS ON
VACATION OF EASEMENTS FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PURPOSES
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota,
as follows:
1. It is hereby found and determined that the following described easements for
drainage and utility purposes should be considered for vacation, in accordance with
the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 412.851 and 160.29:
All that part of the ten (10) foot drainage and utility easement along
the southeasterly line of Lot 22, Block 4, Lake Edina 2nd Addition,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying
northwesterly of a line drawn parallel with and distant 9.00 feet north-
westerly of the southeasterly line of said Lot 22, except for the southerly
5 feet of Lot 22; and
The south 5 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, Warden Acres Peterson replat except
the east 10 feet and the west 5 feet thereof and the north 5 feet of
Lot 3, Block 1, Warden Acres Peterson Replat except the east 10 feet
and the west 5 feet thereof.
2... This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the form of notice
included in paragraph 3 hereof for the purpose of holding a public hearing on
whether such vacations shall be made in the interest of the public.
3. The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and
purpose of said hearing to be published once a week for two weeks, in the Edina
Sun - Current, being the official newspaper of the City, the first publication at
least 14 days prior to the date of such hearing and to post such notice, at least
14 days prior to the date of such hearing, in at least three (3) public and
conspicuous places within the City, as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section
412.851. Such notice shall be in substantially the following form:
.(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ON VACATION OF EASEMENTS FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PURPOSES
LOT 22, BLOCK 4, LAKE EDINA 2ND ADDITION
LOT 2, BLOCK 1, WARDEN ACRES PETERSON REPLAT
IN THE CITY OF EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin
County, Minnesota will meet at the Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street on
March 4, 1985, at 7:00 P.M., for the purpose of holding a public hearing on
the proposed vacation of the following easements for drainage and utility
purposes:
All that part of the ten (10) foot drainage and utility easement along
the southeasterly line of Lot 22, Block 4, Lake Edina 2nd Addition,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying
northwesterly of a line drawn parallel with and distant 9.00 feet north-
westerly of the southeasterly line of said Lot 22, except for the southerly
5 feet of Lot 22.
2/4/85
The south 5 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, Warden Acres Peterson Replat except
the east 10 feet and the west 5 feet thereof and the north 5 feet of Lot 3,
Block 1, Warden Acres Peterson Replat except the east 10 feet and the west
5 feet thereof.
All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or
not the above proposed easement vacations are in the public interest and should
be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the
extent to which such proposed easement vacations affect existing easements within
the area of the proposed vacations and the extent to which the vacations affect
the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling
electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains,
and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacations, to continue maintaining
the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain,
repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying,
in any such vacation resolutions, the extent to which any or all of any such ease-
ments, and such authority to maintain, and to enter upon the area of the proposed
vacations, shall continue.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Richards was seconded by Member Turner for payment of
the following claims as per Pre -List dated 2/4/85: General Fund $75,757.00, Poor
Fund $184.22, Park Fund $580.27, Art Center $318.80, Golf Course Fund $8,494.75,
Recreation Center Fund $4,538.66, Water Fund $3,916.58, Utility Fund $7,435.06,
Liquor Dispensary Fund $1,834.27, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $1,244.42, Total
$104,304.04; and Pre -List dated 2/4/85: General Fund $26,902.67, Park Fund $77.95,
Art Center $129.32, Golf Course Fund $553.22, Recreation Center Fund $3,011.41,
Water Fund $5,555.88, Utility Fund $4,367.10, Liquor Dispensary Fund $559.05,
Total $41,000.70.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
There being no further business, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting adjourned at
10:20 p.m.
City Clerk
,.
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
FEBRUARY 25, 1985
Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Turner and Mayor Courtney.
EMPLOYEE DAVE SCHOEN COMMENDED. Mr. Bernhardson introduced Dave Schoen stating
that he has been employed as a parttime employee starting in August of 1979 and
became a fulltime employee in February of 1980, progressing to the position of
wine buyer in the York Municipal Liquor Store. He also has served as assistant
manager and has taken a special interest in wines and also the customers served.
Mr. Schoen was commended for his excellent work and was presented with a silver
pen bearing the Edina Logo. Members of the Council also expressed their thanks
and appreciation for his dedication and effort.
MINUTES of the Regular Council Meetings of January 7 and 21, 1985, and the Special
Meeting of January 28, 1985, were approved as submitted by motion of Member Turner,
seconded by Member Bredesen.
Ayes: Bredesen, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
PLAN AMENDMENT APPROVED FOR VERNON WOODS 2ND ADDITION. Affidavits of Notice were
presented.by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Hughes advised
that final rezoning to PRD -2 Planned Residential District and plat approval was
granted by the Council in 1983. The approval was for a five -unit townhouse project
for the property. Since the approval three of the units have been constructed
on the easterly portion of the site and the applicants now are proposing to start
the westerly two townhouse units. The plans as originally approved showed a tennis
court on the southerly portion of the site. The applicants now wish to delete the
tennis court and relocate the westerly two townhouses further south to provide a
better separation of the buildings and to provide a more generous entry courtyard.
The plan amendment also requires a minor replatting of the property which has the
effect of moving the front lot lines for the two buildings further to the south
and east to provide new lots. Mr. Hughes stated that the Community Development
and Planning Commission has reviewed the request at their meeting of January 30,
1985, and recommends approval of the plan amendment and the replat. No objections
being heard, Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL
FOR VERNON WOODS 2ND ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that that certain plat entitled "Vernon
Woods 2nd Addition ", platted by Vernon Woods Investments, Inc., a Minnesota
General partnership consisting of G. William Pearson and Paul J. Elmer, owners
and proprietors, and Citizens State Bank of St. Louis Park, a Corporation organized
and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota, mortgagee, and presented at
the regular meeting of the City Council of February 25, 1985, be and is hereby
granted preliminary plat approval.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVED FOR EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS, IDS NO. 273 (5701 NORMAN -
DALE ROAD; IMPROVEMENTS NO. P- 14.AND NO. P -15 AUTHORIZED. Mr. Hughes presented the
request of the Edina Public Schools, IDS #273, for a Conditional Use Permit.. He
advised that the Edina Community Center, 5701 Normandale Road, proposes to construct
additional off - street parking to support the present and future parking needs of the
Center. The lots proposed are an east parking lot and a parking lot on the south
side of the Center. Since review by the Community Development and Planning Commission,
there have been some revisions to the design of the lots. He presented a graphic
showing the south lot and pointed out the existing east frontage road of T.H. 100,
advising that the access to the lot would be maintained at approximately the same
location and would be constructed where there is now an existing shot put and discus
throw area. The plan shows substantial landscaping in the area between the frontage
road and the parking lot. He noted that the lot complies with the requirements of
the Zoning Ordinance with the exception of the setback. A 20 foot setback from the
property line is required and an 8 -10 foot setback is proposed. In order to comply,
many of the parking spaces in the adjacent row would have to be eliminated. There-
fore, staff would suggest that a variance be granted for a setback in that area.
Mr. Hughes then presented a graphic showing the east lot with three diagonal rows
of parking, and with circulation from Southview Lane. The net addition of parking
spaces of the two proposed lots is between 230 and 240 new spaces. The Community
Development and Planning Commission reviewed the request at their meeting of
January 30, 1985, and recommended that a Conditional Use Permit should be granted
for the project. Mr. Hughes then pointed out several issues. First, there is a
one -way circulation system between the lot on the east side to the previous lot
on the south side caused principally by the location of the two temporary buildings
2/25/85
:-
that'are located on the south side of the Center. This hampers the circulation
between lots and results in the use of the frontage road to move from one lot to
another. Second, the two temporary buildings cause the south parking lot to be
constructed more distant from the Center, thus making this parking more undesirable.
He noted that it is unfortunate that the design and location of the parking lots,
which are permanent in nature, are dictated by the presence of these temporary build-
ings. (Member Kelly entered the meeting at this point.) Mr. Hughes advised that
Engineer Hoffman would present cost estimates for the parking lots which the
Community Center has requested that the City.undertake to construct as.a public
project. As such, the City will be responsible for preparing the final plans.and
supervising the construction. In addition to the construction of the parking lots,
increased parking lighting and pedestrian lighting at the Southview parking lot are
requested. Mr. Hoffman stated that lighting plans would be developed later and
cost estimates to be presented are for construction of the parking lots. He pre-
sented estimated construction costs as follows:
A. GRADING AND PAVING PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT NO. P -P -14 IN THE FOLLOWING:
South Side of Edina Community Center
Total estimated construction cost for Parking Lot Improvement No. P -P -14 at
$113,818.44, proposed to be assessed against Independent School District No. 273
(PIN 19- 28- 24 -23- 0001).
B. GRADING AND PAVING PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT NO. P -P -15 IN THE FOLLOWING:
East Parking Lot - Edina Community Center
Total estimated construction cost for Parking Lot Improvement No. P -P -15 at
$68,972.33, proposed to be assessed against Independent School District No. 273
(PIN 19- 28- 24 -23- 0001).
Mr. Hoffman pointed that total construction cost for the two lots is estimated at
$182,790.77 for a cost per space of $761.63. These costs include construction,
engineering and interest costs. He noted that there has been some discussion
that the City might consider as part of its effort supplying the engineering and
clerical costs which are estimated at $22,500.00. The School District has indicated
they would pay the City for the project on a cash basis so as not to incur capital-
ized interest cost estimated.at $18,713.95. Additionally, the City has been asked
to absorb the cost of curb and gutter, removal, fence and post removal, clearing
and removing necessary shrub and a tree and painting parking lines. This would
result in a net cost reduction to the School District of approximately $41,500.00.
Mr..Hoffman advised that staff is.still reviewing the Southview lot area and
suggests that consideration be given to adding an entrance to the north lot along
the Normandale Frontage Road to provide better access and flow. Member Bredesen
asked what the logic was for the City to incur.cost on this project. Member Turner
commented that when.the City was asked -to participate the first time,.the Council
had asked the Edina Human Relations Commission to look at how much community use
there was of the Center and it was determined that it was indeed a community facility
and it was appropriate for the City to be involved. Member Turner stated she felt
this time around that there is a strong and large community use of that building,
both by the City Park and Recreation Department, community education and a large
number of community.non- profit organizations and therefore, the City should parti-
cipate in the parking lot projects. Member Bredesen explained that he had no
quarrel as to the public use of the Center, but that his concern was that there are
two public entities involved and that the users of the facility should pay for its
existence. If the cost incurred by,the City is not-factored in, it will be assumed
that was for free and it gets to be a taxpayer supported facility. He felt it
would be of some benefit to have the City's costs recognized.and added that it has
been our policy to have users pay costs. It was pointed out that none of the
capital costs involved.will be picked up by users' fees, but would be assumed by
the School District. Member Kelly commented that some of the user cost is being
charged as part of the leases with tenants. Member Bredesen stated he would like
to see all of the cost for improvements to the facility recovered over a period of
time by users'.fees. Douglas Johnson, Director of the Community Center, clarified
usage of the.facility pointing out that approximately 40% is community education,
20% non - profit usage, 6% Park and Recreation Department usage resulting in approxi-
mately 65% non - tenant usage. Member Turner observed that the Community Center
Advisory Committee is in the process of developing a 5 -year plan for the use
of the building, the governing structure, and capital improvements and that it is
an issue that the Committee should discuss and deal with for the long term. No
other objection being heard, Member Turner offered the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
WHEREAS, the procedural requirements of Ordinance No. 825 (The Zoning Ordinance)
have been met, and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Findings as required by Ordinance No. 825
have been.satisfied;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby grants a Condi-
tional Use Permit to the Edina Public Schools, IDS No. 273, at 5701 Normandale Road,
for the purpose of constructing two parking lots according to plans submitted.
2/25/85
i
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted. "'`41
Member Kelly then introduced the following resolution, moving its adoption:
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
PARKING LOT.IMPROVEMENT.NO. P -14
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows:
1. It is hereby found and determined that a petition has been filed requesting
the Council to construct a parking lot improvement at the Edina Community Center,
5701 Normandale Road, and to assess the entire cost against the property of
the petitioners, and that said petition has been signed by all owners of real
property where said improvement is to be located.
2. The making of said improvement in accordance with said petition is hereby
ordered pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.031 (3), (Session Laws of
1961, Chapter 525, Section 2). Said improvement is hereby designated and shall
be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT NO. P -14.
The entire cost of said improvement is hereby ordered to be assessed against
the properties where said improvement is to be located.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
Member Turner then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT.NO. P -15
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows:
1. It is hereby found and determined that a petition has been filed requesting
the Council to construct a parking lot improvement at the Edina Community Center,
5701.Normandale Road, and to assess the entire cost against the property of
the petitioners, and that said petition has been signed by all owners of real
property where said improvement is to be located.
2. The making of said improvement in accordance with said petition is hereby
ordered pursuant to.Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.031 (3), (Session Laws of
1961, Chapter 525, Section 2). Said improvement is hereby designated and shall
be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT NO. P -15.
The entire cost of said improvement is hereby ordered to be assessed against
the properties where said improvement is to be located.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
RESOLUTION APPROVING CITY PARTICIPATION
Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that approval
is.hereby granted for City participation in the following improvements:
1. Parking Lot Improvement No. P -14 - Edina Community Center
2.. Parking Lot Improvement No. P -15 - Edina Community Center, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that participation be limited to the cost of curb and
gutter removal, signing and painting parking lines in addition to assuming all
engineering and clerical costs and providing project supervision, as the City's
service to the community at large.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING ON ZONING CHANGE (R -1 TO PRD -3) FOR BRUTGER COMPANIES CONTINUED.
As requested by the.proponent, Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member
Bredesen to continue the public hearing on the Zoning Change from R -1 to PRD -3
for the Brutger Companies, for property generally located west of Cahill Road
and south of Dewey Hill Road, to the Council Meeting of March 18, 1985.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
CONCERN VOICED REGARDING CABLE TELEVISION COMPANY. Jeanette Applequist, 6328
Rolf Avenue, stated that she was a producer of a local television show and
suggested changes that would assist Rogers Cablesystems in savings operating
costs. Mr. Bernhardson suggested he relay the information to the Cable
Coordinator. No action was taken.
2/25/85
CONCERN VOICED REGARDING TRAFFIC AT 78TH STREET AND CAHILL ROAD. Roy Monahan,
7500 Cahill Road, voiced his concern regarding the traffic at 78th Street and
Cahill Road. He indicated that it very difficult to make a left turn from Cahill
onto 78th Street and asked if any traffic study will be made of that area.
Mr. Hoffman responded that a traffic study of the intersection has been made twice
in the past three years-in an effort to justify installation of a traffic signal as
an ultimate answer. The last study fell short of the required criteria but it is
staff's belief that it will meet the requirements shortly and when it does staff
will recommend to the Council that a traffic signal be installed to be paid through.
municipal gas tax funds. No action was taken.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF 2/19/85 APPROVED. Member Bredesen's motion
was seconded by Member Kelly to approve the following recommended action as listed
in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of February 19, 1985:
1) That "NO PARKING ANYTIME" signs be erected prohibiting parking on the south side
of Wooddale Lane,
2) That "NO PARKING - HERE TO CORNER" sign be erected to prohibit parking on the
north side of Wooddale Lane 30' east of Wooddale Avenue,
3) That "NO PARKING - HERE TO CORNER" sign be erected to prohibit parking on the
east side of Wooddale Avenue 30' south of Wooddale Lane,
4).That St. Stephen's Church continue to be advised of the process of the recommended
action,
and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
UPDATE GIVEN ON FRANCE AVENUE /494 PROJECT CITY PARTICIPATION. Mr. Hoffman advised
that the Metropolitan Council Transportation Advisory Board has now approved using
federal funding for the France Avenue /494 improvement project which will cover 76%
of the project cost. Accordingly, the project is back on line and the State will
award bids on March 22, 1985. Mr. Hoffman stated that he will bring to the Council
a cost estimate of the City's participation in the project and will recommend that
the City use State Aid funds for its.share.of the cost. No action was taken.
REPORT GIVEN ON PROPOSED CROSSTOWN HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT. Mr. Hoffman recalled that
two years ago the Council had asked the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners to
make some safety improvements to the Crosstown Highway on the section from the
east boundary of the City to Tracy Avenue which has accident problem areas. In
response, the County has proposed five improvements, four of which are on the freeway
and on which the City has no jurisdiction. The fifth improvement proposed is to
redesign the ramp from northbound T.H. 100 to eastbound Crosstown to bring it more
gradually into the flow of traffic eastbound on the Crosstown and to allow an
acceleration lane. In order to construct the improvement, the frontage road will
be eliminated and the ramp will be relocated approximately 20 feet closer to the
homes in that area.and the ramp grade will be about 6 feet higher to accomodate
the grade on the Crosstown. Mr. Hoffman advised that the State and County has
asked the City of Edina for approval of the proposed ramp realignment. Although it
would be a safety improvement, Mr. Hoffman pointed out that it would impact the
Keller home especially -and he wanted to get the Council's reaction to the project.
Construction.of a vertical visual barrier f_or.the Keller home may be a consideration
the Council may wish to discuss at budget time as part of this safety project.
Mr.:- Hoffman stated that he was bringing this information to the Council so that
they would be advised of the proposed project. The Council asked that -.he work with
the County /State to -try to -'get them to.,construct a barrier.to protect the Keller home..
Mr. Hoffman added that he would be meeting with the residents involved to explain
the proposed improvement to them. No further action was taken.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY MLC REGARDING LOCAL GOVERNMENT AIDS DISCUSSED. Mr. Bernhardson
reported that at its meeting on February 21, 1985, the MLC Board of Directors adopted
a resolution giving a qualified endorsement of the League of Minnesota Cities'
Aid Formula to distribute local government aid. He noted that the qualifier
is that the MLC endorses and supports the League of Minnesota Cities local
government aid formula distribution, if fully funded, and that this is con-
sidered only an intermediate step headed in the right direction. No action was
taken.
CITY HALL SPACE STUDY COMMITTEE DISCUSSED. Mr. Bernhardson reminded the Council
that any names for appointment to the City Hall Space Study Committee should be
given to the Mayor so that the committee can be activated. No action was taken.
BOARDS /COMMISSIONS APPOINTMENTS AND COUNCIL LIASION CONTINUED TO 3/4/85. Mayor
Courtney suggested that the remaining appointments to boards /commissions be held
over to the March 4, 1985 meeting so that the School Board could recommend an
appointment to the Human Relations Commission. He also reminded the Council to
review their liasion assignments with the various boards /commissions so that any
2/25/85
reassignments could also be made at that time. Motion of Member Kelly was
seconded by Member Turner to continue the appointments to March 4, 1985.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
COUNCIL /LOCAL LEGISLATORS BREAKFAST TO BE-HELD MARCH 8. Mr. Bernhardson reminded
the Council that the Council /Local Legislators Breakfast is scheduled for Friday,
March 8, 1985, at the City Hall, at 7:30 a.m. Member Bredesen stated he would
not be able to attend.
LIQUOR STORES STRATEGY REPORT DISCUSSED. Mr. Bernhardson referred to the report
given the Council at its last meeting on Liquor Stores Strategy and asked for any
comment or questions regarding the report. Members Turner and Bredesen commented
that it was an excellent report. Mr. Bernhardson said a report on the liquor
stores at year end would be forthcoming within the next few weeks.
CORPORATE REPORT TO BE PRESENTED AT NEXT MEETING. Mr. Bernhardson advised that
The Corporate Report would be ready for presentation at the next meeting.
C. WAYNE COURTNEY NOMINATED FOR C. C. LUDWIG AWARD 1985. Stating that she would
be honored to- nominate Mayor Courtney for the C. C. Ludwig Award 1985, Member
Turner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the League of Minnesota Cities annually presents the C. C. Ludwig Award
to an individual who has made outstanding contributions through their involvement
in municipal government; and
WHEREAS, C. Wayne Courtney served the Village of Morningside as a Council Member
from 1962 to 1966; and
WHEREAS, he has provided leadership in the City of Edina by serving as a Council
Member from 1966 to 1980, and as Mayor from 1980 to the present time; and
WHEREAS, Mayor Courtney has with great dedication shared his time and talents
at the regional level by working as a member of the Metropolitan Waste Control
Commission, the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities, and other regional
committees; and
WHEREAS, Mayor Courtney has taken an active leadership role in the League of
Minnesota Cities;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the name of
C. WAYNE COURTNEY
be placed in nomination for the League of Minnesota Cities' 1985 C. C. Ludwig
Award.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
REPORT GIVEN ON SURPLUS FOOD DISTRIBUTION. Member Turner reported that, for.the
February surplus food distribution to Edina residents, Key Cadillac, 6825 York
Avenue, had provided both a truck and driver to help with the pickup and unload -
ing.and that together with volunteers from Colonial Church of Edina the monthly
distribution was made entirely through volunteer help to the three sites.
Member Bredesen suggested that a letter of thanks and appreciation be sent to
Key Cadillac. Mr. Bernhardson stated he would draft a letter for the Mayor's
signature.
FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING DISCUSSED. Member Bredesen stated he had received a
copy of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities' position on the subject
of Federal Revenue Sharing and commented that it does not reflect his own
personal position or that of the Council.and suggested that we communicate to
the AMM and the Minnesota congressional delegation -the position of the Council.
Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Federal Revenue Sharing was the result of the new federalism to replace
catagorical grants in the early 1970's, and
WHEREAS, Revenue Sharing has become a substitute for locally raised revenues,
and
WHEREAS, this has significantly dimished local accountability for expenditures
and economy of service provision by local units of government, and
WHEREAS, many units receiving Revenue Sharing have the economic unability to
:raise a greater share of their revenues locally, and
WHEREAS, such expenditure programs have helped to exacerbate the problem of
the federal debt;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that
the Council desires to express its opposition to the continuance of such
expenditures, and
2/25/85
`1
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the reduction, together with reductions in several
other catagories, be used for reduction of the federal debt, together with the
reduction of the federal income tax burden.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
ADVISORY COMMITTEES DISCUSSED. Mr. Bernhardson referred to previous Council dis-
cussion regarding successive terms on advisory boards /commissions and advised that
he would be giving the Council Members additional data on the issue.
REVISED PROPOSED AGENDA DISTRIBUTED. Mr. Bernhardson briefly reviewed the revised
tentative agenda of upcoming meetings. Mr. Erickson noted that Rogers Cablesystems
would not be ready to make their presentation at the March 4 meeting and suggested
they be rescheduled for March 18. Members Turner and Bredesen stated they would
be away on April 8 and asked that the meeting be rescheduled.
PETITION FOR WATERMAIN EXTENTION FOR WESTWOOD COURT REFERRED TO ENGINEERING DEPT.
Mr. Bernhardson advised that a petition for a watermain extention for Westwood
Court has been received. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Bredesen
to refer the petition to the Engineering Department for processing.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
HEARING DATE SET FOR VACATION OF PORTION OF LINCOLN DRIVE. Being advised that a
petition has been received for vacation of a portion of Lincoln Drive, Member
Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON
VACATION OF PORTION OF LINCOLN DRIVE
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota,
as follows:
1. It is hereby found and determined that the following described easement for
road purposes should be considered for vacation, in accordance with the provisions
of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 412.851 and 160.29:
That part of Lot 4, Block 2, and of Outlot A, Edina Green lying within a
60 foot road easement as per Document No. 3909691. Said road easement is
described as follows:
Beginning at a point in the North line of the Northwest 1/4 of said
Section 31, distant 185 feet West of the Southwest corner of Parkwood
Knolls 15th Addition; thence South parallel with the Southerly extension
of the West line of said Addition 23.31 feet; thence Southwesterly 196.66
feet along a tangential curve to the right, having a radius of 440.1 feet;
thence Southerly 198.54 feet along a reverse curve having a radius of
672.63 feet; thence Southerly tangent to last described curve 85 feet;
thence Southeasterly 280.36 feet along a tangential curve to the left
having a radius of 318.42 feet; thence Southeasterly tangent to last
described curve 205.5 feet; thence Southerly 331.88 feet along a tangential
curve to the right having a radius of 275.72 feet; thence Southwesterly
tangent to last described curve 112.74 feet; thence Southerly 284.14 feet
along a tangential curve to the left having a radius of 370 feet to the
center line of Lincoln Drive as platted in the plat of Nine Mile North and
there terminating.
2. This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the form of notice
included in paragraph 3 hereof for the purpose of holding a public hearing on
whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the public.
3. The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and
purpose of said hearing to be published once a week for two weeks, in the Edina
Sun, being the official newspaper of the City, the first publication at least 14
days prior to the date of such hearing and to post such notice, at least 14 days
prior to the date of such hearing, in at least three (3) public and conspicuous
places within the City, as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. Such
notice shall be in substantially the following form:
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ON VACATION OF PORTION OF LINCOLN DRIVE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin
County, Minnesota will meet at the Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street on
April 1, 1985, at 7:00 P.M., for the purpose of holding a public hearing on
the proposed vacation of the following easement for road purposes:
.2/25/85
That part of Lot 4, Block 2, and of Outlot A, Edina Green lying within a
60 foot road easement as per Document No. 3909691. Said road easement is
described as follows:
Beginning at a'point in the North line of the Northwest 1/4 of said
Section 31, distant 185 feet West of the Southwest corner of Parkwood
Knolls 15th Addition; thence South parallel with the Southerly extension
of the West line of said Addition 23.31 feet; thence Southwesterly 196.66
feet along a tangential curve to the right, having a radius of 440.1 feet;
thence Southerly 198.54 feet along a reverse curve having a radius of
672.63 feet; thence Southerly tangent to last described curve 85 feet;
thence Southeasterly 280.36 feet along a tangential curve to the left
having a radius of 318.42 feet; thence Southeasterly tangent to last
described curve 205.5 feet; thence Southerly 331.88 feet along a tangential
curve to the right having a radius of 275.72 feet; thence Southwesterly
tangent to last described curve 112.74 feet; thence Southerly 284.14 feet
along a tangential curve to the left having a radius of 370 feet to the
center line of Lincoln Drive as platted in the plat of Nine Mile North and
there terminating.
All-persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not
the above proposed road easement vacation is in the public interest and should
be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the
extent to which such proposed vacation affects existing easements within the
area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the
authority of any person, coroporation, or municipality owning or controlling
electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes,
mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue
maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof
vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for
the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which
any or all of any such easements, and such authority to maintain, and to enter
upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 1120 -A3 - AMENDMENT TO CABLE TV ORDINANCE CONTINUED
TO MARCH 18, 1985. As recommended by staff, Member Kelly's motion was seconded
by Member Bredesen to continue the First Reading of Ordinance No. 1120 -A3 - Amend-
ment to the Cable TV Ordinance to the meeting of March 18, 1985.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
EXTENTION OF CONTRACT FOR DEED, LOT 11, BLOCK 1, LAKE EDINA VILLAGE REPLAT APPROVED.
Mr. Bernhardson recalled that approximately one year ago the City Council had
approved .a Contract for Deed in.the amount of $16,000.00 for sale of the last
City owned lot in Lake Edina Village Replat. The purchaser has submitted a letter
requesting the City to allow an extention of the Contract for Deed on the property
for a period of six months to August 15, 1985. The contract provides for pay-
ment of interest at 11 %. No objection being heard, Member Kelly moved approval
of the extension of Contract for Deed for Lot 1, Block 1, Lake Edina Village
Replat to August 15, 1985. Motion was seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Notion carried.
CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Bredesen was seconded by Member Kelly for payment
of the following Claims as per Pre -List dated 2/25/95: General Fund $239,808.19,
Park Fund $8,232.08, Art Center $4,008.14, Swimming Pool Fund $899.96, Golf
Course Fund $7,039.25, Recreation Center Fund $38,022.53, Gun Range Fund $524.86,
Water Fund $6,503.33, Utility Fund $221,121.05, Liquor Dispensary Fund $92,471.74,
Construction Fund $2,954.20, Total.$621,585.33; and for Confirmation of the
following Claims dated 1/31/85: General Fund $195,669.11, Park Fund $3,157.99,
Art Center $806.45, Swimming Pool Fund $56.30, Golf Course Fund $1,063.91,
Recreation Center Fund $6,427.14, Gun Range Fund $322.27, Water Fund $15,769.74,
Utility Fund $2,508.37, Liquor Dispensary Fund $283,854.54, Total $509,635.82
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
There being no further business, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting adjourned
at 8:18 P.M.
City Clerk
I A. LETTER OF CONCERN REGARDING THE TREE TRIMMING HEARING
M--
RAYMOND CLAUSEN
February 27, 1985
T0: Members o6 the City
City o S Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Subject:
Counc t,
Tree TA mm,ing Pro j ect
Hearing - March 4, 1985
Aster receiving the noti6icatdon oS this heaping, I ca,tted on
Bob Kojet.in to raise a number oS queation6 concerning thi,6 matter.
In the event I am not able to attend the meeting, it .us hoped that
the comments in thi.6 communication wilt have your con ideration.
Fix6t o6 at t, a departure Srom the po.t i.c y hereto S one in eS S ect o6
6inanc.i.n.g the care oS trees in the City through the regular budgeting
proce,6.6 and the general tax levy seems to me unwaAAanted. It opens
up a device Sor gdnancing a whale host o6 city a erv.ic es by this route.
This new potic.y conceivably could shi4t the coat oS these programs
away Srom the %egutax real estate tax and caeate the .cttu6ion either
that our taxe6 are going down or that money " being Sreed up Srom
the Sormer budgeted tree maintenance dot au San other city purposes.
Mr. Ko j et-i.n. mentioned in our meeting that in an eaxUer s.cnu tcvc
heaving on thin same matter, a number oS property owner6 with Sew
or no trees at a.lt Sett that they should not have to pay San the
trimming o6 boulevard trees in Sront o4 neighboxV homes. This
argument has encouraged the assessment attet ati.ve, charging the
coat on the bah i6 oS the number oS theca d,iAectty retated to the lot
in question.
That .cis a .6imple aotuti:on but hardly 6a i& when the treeless .tot owners
conceivab.ty might have a host oS chitdren using the 6kat,in.g &inU,
soccer 6ie.t4, tennis couAt6, basebatt 6ie.td6, etc. Sree oS charge.
Generally, u6e oS the assessment manner oS 6inanc,ing community pro -
jec t,6 has been .iimi ted in my experience to mare or .tens permanent
in.pr.ovements Bach as curb and paving, sewer, wate1c, etc. The coat
oS tree maintenance is completely out6ide this c.taszi6icati.on. It
-us a continuing expense .item that w tt, be repeated soon aster the
2 -3 year length oS the cuAAent project. Better to .took Sorward to
this almost cehtain cost with an adequate -stem in the general tax
budget every year.
(continued)
3"
Page #2--Edina City Councit 2 -27 -85
The pte6ence ob tnee6 in a neighbotchood enhances the vaZu.e o6
ptopetty in the ovena t area and a66ect6 .thereby the assessed
vatuation -6 o6 neZa ted homes. Thi�s hays a ditec i .in6tuence on the
taxe6 on a patti,cu2a& ptopetty and the ta&ger contribution it
makes to the genetat tax poot. In a 6ense to azze66 the ptopetty
owner. o6 6uch a tot on the ba6-u6 o6 a "dottat pen thee" Levy
woutd 6eem to burden.hdm mote than once 6or the Game 6etvice.
Boutevard trees add a6 much to the tone and quatity ob a ne.ighbot-
hood a6 they do to the pattc:cutat tot on which they grow. The
home owner many times teceives t ttte 6hade 6tom these tAee6 because
o6 thew. distance Jtom the house. The bene6it -6 6a?t to att the
owners in the neighborhood, and even to the peopte driving through,
much a6 a tovety park of take woutd add to the charm o6 nearby
ac&eage.
Not agreeing at a t with the a6ze66ment method o6 6 nanc in.g the tAee
ptobtem, 6hou2d this device ptevait anyway, 1 woutd object
6ttenuou6ty to the "thee- count" a tocat-i,on o6 the cost. We have a
cornet tot with a di�sptopottionate number ob tnee6 compared to the
average Edina ptopetty, and woutd attract a cor&e6pondingty ta&ger
a66e66ment. In the past when "6e66ment6 have been tevted Got
paving, hewer, and water in our area, the a tocat-i,on has been on a
"per tot" ba6xz. We think this method ,vs mote equ.cta.bte. We have
a good deal o6 sheet 6tontage on both Rotting Green Parkway and
on Cte6cent Tettace, but that doesn't mean that we use these streets
anymore than other ne c.ghbot6 or .itinerant tra66 is coming and going
6rom home6 in the area. We do not have to pay ptopotti.onatety h.Lgher
6or City snow temovat co6t6 becau.6e ob th6 extra .street 6tontage.
Neithet 6houtd we in 6aiAne66 be expected to pay mote bon maintaining
a neighbothood tax-paying park ,improvement which .v, mote of te66 Sor
everyone's common good.
The pte6ent tegutationb Got both 6tate and 4ederat income taxe6 do
not permit the deduction o6 tax azze66ment6, whenea6 genvuZ taxe6
are atZowed to` reduce taxabte -income. To ptace the tee ttimm-i.ng
.item in Bd.i.na'6 generat tax budget would thereby make the net cost
of the undertaking a, much as 50% tower bon many Edina citizens.
Thank you 6or taking these bactou into con6.idera ion at the heating
and in you& 6uAtheA detibetation6 on the matter.
Res pect6utty,
Raymond Ctau6en
4820 Rotting Green Parkway
Edina, MN 55436
January 22, 1985
Mr. Fred Richards
Councilman
7225 Fleetwood Drive
Edina, MN 55435
RE: Meeting to determine the necessity of tree trimming
Dear Mr. Richards:
I own the property at 5223 Green Farms Court, and I regret that I
will be unable to attend the city council meeting on March 4th,
however, I am taking the time to write this letter because I have
a strong opinion on the outcome of this determination. In the
past I have contracted someone to trim our trees at various
properties. I feel that tree maintenance should be left with the
property owner and remain with the many rights that go along with
property ownership. I feel the city has very little grounds on
which to make this determination for me, and intrude on my
property for no apparent health or safety reasons.
I think a great many of your constituents agree that tree
trimming on private property is not a function of government, and
I hope that you will be supporting this position on Monday, March
4th.
Sincerly,
�iz
Paul B. Kelley
P.O. Box 1216
Minnetonka, MN 55345
(612) 938 -3324
f
fides Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation Department
409 Harrison Avenue South
Edina, MN 55343
February 19, 1985
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Attention: City Council
Subject: Tree Trimming Proposal
Honorable Council:
My two boulevard trees are less than 6" in diameter. Really now,
do they need trimming?
I firmly object to the proposed tree trimming as follows:
1. My trees do not need trimming.
2. I am capable of trimming my own trees.
3. I can hire a tree trimmer if needed.
4. I planted the trees to upgrade my property and also
as a.benefit to the city. Are we not supposed to
enhance property by ourselves?
5. Perhaps the proposal should be studied further by
a conservative person.
Please register my firm objection to the proposal.as it is now
stated.
Very truly yours
Ale
Alvin M. Anderson
7homae 'R. 8awl'ez
5708 DALE AVENUE - EDINA. MN 55436
Mr Robert Ko7etin
Edina Park And Rec Dept
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minn 55,424
Dear. Sir,
There is an expression often heard these days that states that
if something isn't broke it shouldn't be fixed. This sums up my
feeling about the City.of Edina's proposed tree trimming
program. I will take a very dim view of any attempt to alter or
trim the two trees on my property now or in the near future.
They do not encroach on public property. A far better solution
would be to require property owners to take care of their overt
trees as needs be.
Respectfully
GLENN L. AUGUSTON
5509 RIDGE PARK ROAD
EDINA, MINN. 55436
4411�, ",I.
�Lryj'l�uW19 f
awe Z .G2;7�Ztdl�rd �✓�,�
ae
r
e �� CZ <Z!/ %L � G� � ��I �.L.LCQ/. ' ; /.,L Zi• t cr- ui
11
February 13, 1985
City of Edina
4801 West 50th St.
Edina, Mn. 55424
Attention: Mr. Bob Kojetin, Director Edina Park and Recreation Dept.
Thank you for your letter (received Feb. 14) about a public hearing to
be held Monday, March 4, 1985, on the tree trimming project for a portion
of Edina property owners.
Since my wife and I will be away from the City on March 4, our written
comments and response are as follows:
First of all, we're fully aware there are many boulevara trees along Edina
streets in the area mentioned in your letter which not only need trimming,
but some should probably be removed. I'm sure also a high percentage of
these trees have never been trimmed. This is evidenced by broken branches
in the streets,.and other damage, which has occurred during windstorms, ice
storms, etc., especially in the past 3 or 4 years.
On the other hand, there are some streets such as Blake Road South, where
we live, that has not had this problem. Therefore, we're personally opposed.
to this assessment of $60.00 per tree for the following reasons:-
1. We have only one tree, an elm, on our boulevard at 409 Blake Road
South, and it was trimmed back last winter 1983 -84 by- Northern
States Power Co. to allow sufficient space for their power _
libes. In fact, over time the entire one side of the tree
has been cut back, so as far as we're concerned, it could
be removed since it is no longer a desireable or beautiful
tree.
2. We built and have lived in our home since July 1949 (36 years)
and this elm tree was a small tree on the boulevard when we
purchased the lot, so we didn't plant it.
3. Blake Road South in our location is also County Road No. 20 so
this boulevard must be a street right -of -way of the County, and
their responsibility even though the lawn area is maintained by
us. We therefore believe those Edina property owners on Blake
Road South, also designated as County Road No. 20, should be
exempt from the City of Edina assessment or any other such assess-
ment for tree trimming.
4. Trees.on our property have been personally and professionally
trimmed and maintained over the years at our time and expense,
including the one elm tree on the ooulevard, other than for the
occasional trimming by Northern States Power Co.
Page 2
5. We're opposed to an assessment and paying out money for someone
else's neglect.
6. Once the City of -Edina begins an assessment for tfee- trimming,
this would undoubpedly be a continuous and periodic expense to
us and other homeowners, and again we're opposed to such
action on our portion. of Blake Road South, as we don't need it.
7. We believe the City of Edina should consider only an assess -
ment to those property owners who actually require such tree
trimming dul?ito their own neglect, and who do not properly
maintain their property.
Thank you for the opportunity of expressing oult comments, and we trust your
decision, and that of the City Council, will be favorable to our situation.
Sincerely,
& MRS PAUL F. F.ICHARDSON
409 Blake Road South
Edina, Mn. 55343
17AI x-3 Y,3
C -
1.1 A vAF y o u R. 0 019.471ED L E=-1 TEr2 Ra,-,4RI) G�--
P A�'v,90169 o r-: /, 6 o �t 7,2cres,
4-1 ic6:'
�; 0 2 T� 2�� -. _. _yc --�� s � T - �-f� ✓c= -7'w� c c-- 8��/
772c�S
TY
-X/44 ... 77 QlAlh16> _ .. 7-,zY-F Nl IZE; 2 .
- - - - --
%r�2
#49SJ &T-r17LC:7V�--
r—Tv -,l
o r= /-9v i,-To A
W96INA
4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 f
612 - 927 -8861
Dear Resident:
In 1985 the City is proposing to contract for the trimming"of 1604 trees,
in an area bounded by Crosstown Highway on the south, to the Northern
Boundary line and from Highway 100 on the east to the Western Boundary
Line (County Road 18) on the west.
On Monday, March 4, 1985, the Edina City Council will conduct a public
hearing to determine the necessity of a tree trimming project. This
hearing will be held at 7:00 p.m. at the Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th
Street under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 59, 1984 Session Law. If the
project is ordered, it is expected that the cost of trimming would be
assessed against properties. The City of Edina tree inventory indicates
the boulevard trees which need to be trimmed Immediately, or 2 -3 years.
According to the tree inventory, it has been determined that you have
one or more boulevard trees scheduled for trimming within this program.
The estimated total cost is $96,240. The estimated assessment per tree
is $60.00.
The area proposed to be assessed includes:
An area bounded by Crosstown Highway on the South, the Northern
Boundary line on the North, Highway 100 on the East and.the Western
Boundary Line (County Road 18) on the West.
If approved, this project will be started this spring. Assessments would
be levied late in 1986 and would be due and payable in full in 1987.
Please forward any comments or suggestions to the City Council in care of
City Hall prior to the hearing or be present at the hearing itself.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Very truly yours,
Bob Kojeti , Director
Edina Pa and Recreation Department
BK:mk
"I VfL
Y
L-
C�l�- ��L C�-il , �•'� -� %L� �t -•L 12 6'� -J� -L�' � /E � / `' 3 � �- Cc-7Y�n'c.� -'L�, � %85�
i�-e
I �' lw
�C V 6u L -lam C tiz�t.,v c` ! /� 1!u� -j 5` c`— '�;� -�� ��_n l�-,—.
72e)
lipill
005
r_ Feb. 27, 1985
Bob Kojetin
Edina Park & Recreation Dept.
4801 West 50th St.
Edina MN 55424
Dear Sir:
This letter is in response to your recent letter concerning the
trimming of boulevard trees.
The trees that we have are small and i will take care of having
them trimmed. This trimming will be completed by -March 24th.
Sincerely,
Gerald Ward
421 Blake Road So.
Hopkins, MN 55343
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, City Engineer
VIAa Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: 'West 50th Street - T.H. 100 to Halifax
Preliminary Plans
Even though many words have been written and presentations made with many
alternatives,.a few key transportation elements should be indentified.
The elements that we wish to identify include:
A. Interaction of Eden Avenue and W. 50th'Street between T.H. 100 and
Eden /50th intersection.
B. Protected left turns for westbound'50th Street traffic entering
Eden Avenue.
C. Protected left turns for eastbound 50th Street. entering Browndale
Ave.nue.
D. Re- design of 50th and Wooddale' intersection to include protected
left turn lanes with-re-vamped signals'to include left turn arrows.
E. Provision of parking bay in front of St. Stephens Church if the
church so desires same.
F. Detoriating storm sewer pipe-system at 50th and'Arden which will
require relaying pipe -from 50th and Arden to a.point.750 feet west
on 50th and then.emptying into Minnehaha Creek.
Additionally, following State Aid procedures for design and funding (the- normal
City policy) staff and consultant are recommending a design'wh.ich meets the
standard engineering criteria between T.H. 100 and Wooddale Avenue on West 50th
Street.
For the portion of West 50th Street between " Wooddale Avenue and Halifax staff
and consultant recommend,seeking a variance to Minnesota'-Rules 8820.9912 which
would require 62 feet if parking is allowed on one side or 52 feet if no parking
is allowed. The recommendation`'would be to seek a variance`to allow a forty (40)
foot street accroding to Minnesota Rules 8820.3300'and 8820.:3400 (attached).
Hopefully, this short memorandum will help identify the process and issues for the
street which will lead-to a preliminary plan approval.
FJH:lm
3/15/85
IT
ALL 9 BLiC
-��evi�r 0a" a
CD
8820.3300 VARIANCE.
Subpart 1. Written requests. A formal request by a
political subdivision for a variance from this chapter must:
A. be submitted to the commissioner in writing in the
form of a resolution;
B. identify the project by location and termini; and
i
C. cite the specific part or standard for which the
variance is requested.
Subp. la. Additional information. Additional information
needed:
A. index map;
B. typical section:
(1) inplace section;
(2) proposed section;
C. reasons for the request;
D. the economic, social, safety, and environmental
impacts which may result from the requested variance;
E. effectiveness of the project in eliminating an
existing and projected deficiency in the transportation system; .
F. effect on adjacent lands;
G. number of persons affected; and
M. safety considerations as they apply to:
(1) pedestrians;
(2) bicyclists;
(3) motoring public; and -
(4) fire, police, and emergency units.
Subp. 2. Notice of request. The commissioner shall
publish notice of variance request in the State Register and
shall request comments from interested parties be directed to
the commissioner within 20 calendar days from date of
publication.
Subp. 3. Decision. The commissioner shall base his
decision on the criteria specified in part 8820.3400, subpart 3
and shall notify the political subdivision in writing of his
decision.
Subp. 4. Contested case hearing. Any variance objected to
in writing or denied by the commissioner is subject to a
contested case hearing as required by law.
17 MS s 161.082; 161.083; 162.02; 162.09; 162.155; Laws 1983'b
8 SR 2146
8820.3400 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON VARIANCES.
Subpart 1. Appointment. The commissioner may appoint a
committee to serve as required to investigate and determine a
recommendation for each variance. No elected or appointed
official that represents a political subdivision requesting the
variance may serve on the committee.
Subp. 2. Membership. The committee shall consist of any
five of the following persons: not more than two county highway
engineers, only one of whom may be from a county containing a
city of the first class; not more than two city engineers, only
one of whom may be from !,city of the first class; not more than
two county officials, only one of whom may be from a county
containing a city of the first class; and not more than two city
officials, only one of whom may be from a city of the first
class.
Subp. 3. Operating procedure.. The committee shall meet on
call from the commissioner at which time they shall elect a
chairperson and establish their own procedure to investigate the
requested variance.
The committee shall consider the:
A. economic, social, safety, and environmental
impacts which may result from the requested variance;
B. effectiveness of the project in eliminating an
existing and projected deficiency in the transportation system;
C. effect on adjacent lands;
D. number of persons affected;
E. effect,on future maintenance;
F. safety considerations as they apply to
pedestrians, bicyclists, motoring public, and fire, police, and
emergency units;•and
G. ,. effect
imposing an undue burden t h
ona Politicalssubdivision.
have in
Subp. 4. Recommendation. The committee after considering
all data pertinent to the requested variance shall recommend to
the commissioner approval or disapproval of the request.
MS s 161.082- n.. .r • -. .__ -___
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City of Edina wishes to reconstruct West 50th Street, between
Wooddale Avenue and Halifax Avenue, in part using Municipal State -Aid Funds;
and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation Rule 8820.9912 requires
that West 50th Street between Wooddale Avenue and Halifax Avenue have a minimum
of four lanes; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina believes there are valid reasons for constructing
West 50th Street to a lower design standard and that such lower design standard
will safely and adequately handle existing and proposed traffic;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, that
the City Engineer be directed to submit to the Commissioner of Transportation
a formal request for variance for West 50th Street between Wooddale Avenue and
Halifax Avenue from the minimum number of required four lanes in order to
construct two lanes.
ADOPTED this 18th day of March, 1985.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the
Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 18, 1985, and as recorded
in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 29th day of March, 1985.
City Clerk
r
6125 l,Vilryan Avenue
Edina, Minnesota 55436 r_
February 28, 1985 y
Mayor C. Wayne Courtney
4313 Eton Place
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Wayne:
Historically speaking, the old 'Nooddale School holds great
significance for everyone in our community, even though they
may,not realize it at this time. I would like to suggest a
no -lose solution as an alternative to tearing down the school
in haste.
If Wooddale School were maintained through Edina's
centennial year, 1988, such an interim would help deter-
mine if indeed the building is needed and to explore its
possibilities.
Our Edina Historical Society has done much to add to the
quality of life in Edina. Its efforts to make our community
a good place to live would be furthered by its continued use
of Wooddale School. The society's efforts and plans to cele-
brate our centennial could be centered at the school. It is
the only significant historical building of any size avail-
able for such an event.
Furthermore, if any expansion is necessary at City Hall,
the Park Board offices would seem ideal for a move to the
school. The gynmasium could also be used for Park Board
programs, and such space is much needed.
If Governor Perpich's plan for open schools is, by some chance,
approved, the Community Center may be needed by our school
system. Preserving Wooddale School would leave its space for
the center's activities.
As'to the cost of maintaining the building, with the exception
o :f; a new roof or= boiler, it would require less funds than would
be- needed to demolish it. The demise of the building would be
at a considerable cost, but it could be done on a relatively
short time basis if that is eventually found to be the only
possible solution.
To destroy a unique building in haste, only to find in four
to five years that the space would be of great value, would
not be in the best interests of our city.
Thank you for your consideration in the matter.
ce3+ely ours,
do F ank . --�darelle
FPC /lc - - -
5021 Bedford Avenue
Edina, Minnesota 55436
March 11, 1985
Mr. C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor
Edina City.Hall
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minn. 55424
Dear Mayor Courtney:
Due to conflicting dates, I have been unable to attend
any of the public meetings with regard to the disposi-
tion of Wooddale School, but I wish to register my
strong opposition to having it torn down for any
reason.
The school is a beautiful building which is a credit
to Edina. There are lots of other places that can be
turned into parks without tearing down a building
irreplacable both for its beauty and its history.
There are many possible uses for it and I guess I don't
have any strong feelings on which use should be made
of it. It would certainly make a fine City Hall, and
I understand the present one is bursting at the seams.
If the present City Hall were sold or the land it is
on, it would probably net enough money to do any
remodeling which Wooddale School building might require.
The residents around the school would undoubtedly like
to have a park adjoining their property, but that is not
a sufficient reason to tear down that beautiful building
especially when there are so many Edina needs which
the school building can fulfill.
I urge you to cast your vote for preserving that
building and for the many uses which can be made af:,
it.
Sincerely,
C Ruth E. Halverson
ACIA
MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
4JINI FOUNDED IN 1849 Fort Snelling History Center, St. Paul, MN 55111 • (612) 726 -1171
March 11, 1985
Ms. Marcella Daehn
City Clerk
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Ms. Daehn:
I have been informed that the Edina City Council is considering the fate
of the Wooddale School Building. As a long -time resident of Edina and
as both Assistant Director of the Minnesota Historical Society and Associate
State Historic Preservation Officer, I wish to express to you my sincere
hope that every possible consideration will be given to preserving this
building. I am aware that its architectural significance is not unique,
but it is a part of the historic district in Edina and certainly a land-
mark for our community.
My hope is that every alternative use will be explored and that adequate
time will be made available to examine ways and means to preserve this
portion of our past. In my brief service as a member of the board of
the Edina Historical Society I became aware of the sensitivity and support
of Edina's elected officials to the problems and opportunities of historic
preservation. Edina has an excellent record - -known statewide - -in the
field of historic preservation. I know this will continue, and I hope
a way is found to preserve Wooddale School, especially as Edina nears
its centennial.
Most sincerely,
*. eoj�
Donn M. Coddington
Assistant Director
Associate State Historic Preservation
Officer
DMC:cj
�-a
MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
FOUNDED IN 1849
Ms. Marcella Daehn
City Clerk
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Ms. Daehn:
Fort Snelling History Center, St. Paul, MN 551 1 1 • (612) 726-1171
28 February 1985
It has come to our attention that the Edina City Council is again
considering the future of the Wooddale School Building.
As you are aware, the Wooddale School is a pivotal element in the
Country Club Historic District, which was listed on the National Register
of Historic Places.on April 26, 1982. The school's significance lies
not in a particularly outstanding design (to be sure, many other schools
of similar design survive), but in the fact that it was built as part of
an important early suburban development. Retention of the integrity of
all of the elements of an area such as this is important in understanding
and preserving a locally unique aspect of urban expansion.
Edina has a good record in responding sensitively to preservation
issues. Further, the existence of a large historic area of comparatively
recent vintage, such as is represented by the Country Club District, is
a unique asset. We would urge the city to protect this record and asset
by insuring the preservation of the Wooddale School Building.
Sincerely,
Dennis A. Gimmestad
Assistant State Historic Preservation
Officer
DAG /fr
U
ins5100 Wooddais Avenue • 927 -7151 • Edina, Minnesota 55424
March 14, 1985
Members of the City Council
City of Edina
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear City Council Member:
On behalf of the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors
of Edina Country Club, I'would like to register the Club's objection
to various plans for the expansion of West 50th Street between High-
way 100 and Wooddale Avenue. It is our understanding that a major-
ity of alternative plans for that project would widen West 50th
Street to within a few feet of our west tennis courts.
The close proximity of the street boundary to the tennis courts,
we believe poses a serious treat to the safety of tennis players on
that court. Additionally, we visualize rather heavy pedestrian
traffic on the south side of West 50th Street since that is the
location of all recreational facilities in that area. That traffic
would be created by the city tennis courts, and the Edina Country
Club tennis courts, swimming pool and caddy corps. We base our
opposition to a street widening plan entirely and completely on
concern for the safety of pedestrians and our tennis players. While
noise is also a consideration we do not regard it as critical.
Should time permit we would be pleased to meet with any members
of the Council who wish to discuss this matter.
Please give this matter serious consideration.
Sincerely,
Donald A. Schnobrich
President
13
ee CI F-i"
----- - ----
Za
ZguZa Ati _e_ /
/Mv -5:5'�v-
WEST 50th STREET
WOODDALE SCHOOL BUILDING
WOODDALE SCHOOL SITE
and UTLEY PARK
Comments of the
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
to the
Edina City Council
March 4, 1985
:r—�
Your Heritage Preservation Board continues to follow the public decision process,
and is grateful for this opportunity to comment on the February 4, 1985 public
hearing. We believe it is appropriate to emphasize that we approach these issues
from a city -wide perspective; thus our comments reflect not only a goal to protect
the Country Club National Register Historic District, but also the need to balance
individual interests with larger community needs as well.
The Board recognizes the apparent complexity facing the Council, and understands
the mathmatics of perhaps 2500 or 3000 possible permutations from which to decide.
However, we sense there are really only two issues of overriding public
consequence: (a) the extent to which the Council deems this to be a local, rather
than city -wide, issue; and (b) the consequent sources of public financing to carry
out any improvements.
Similarily, we believe there are really only five alternatives that will arouse
passion from one "side" or another:
1. Retain the Boulevard trees east of Wooddale Avenue
2. Remove one or both rows of trees for street widening
3. Retain Wooddale School
4. Retain the 1926 section of Wooddale School
5. Raze the structure
While there are dozens of additional decisions -- playground layouts, design of turn
lanes, a lagoon or not a lagoon, for example -- the Board regards them as
important professional issues that consultants and staff are extremely qualified to
bring before the Council. Thus we return to the future of the Boulevard trees and
the disposition of Wooddale School because they satisfy two tests of city -wide
importance: uniqueness of the resource, and city -wide fiscal implications.
Greater Public Value
We believe the essence of the controversy is simply an understandable assumption,
by some, of local control over what is really a city -wide issue. Many issues coming
before the Council are clearly important only to adjacent homeowners and
residents: platting, sidewalks, and the like. But the overwhelming physical beauty
of this neighborhood, the recognized historic and architectural importance of the
District, and the multi - million dollar sums involved no matter which option is
chosen, transcend the legitimate individual desires of nearby property owners.
This represents a two -edged sword, of course. On one hand, extraordinary costs
that are clearly important to preserving or enhancing a city -wide resource are, we
believe, justifiable general investments of the city as a whole. An example of this
would be the underground burial of utilities that would enhance the magnificent
boulevard arcade between Wooddale and Halifax. While burial of utilities would
benefit adjacent property owners, the Arcade is an important visual resource to all
citizens of Edina.
On the other hand, the Board cannot support. the destruction of a million dollar
public asset like Wooddale School, simply because nearby property owners would
like additional open space near their homes. We believe that if the Council chooses
to view this as a city -wide decision, the current array of alternatives will narrow
sharply.
The 50th Street Boulevard
The Board continues to strongly support the preservation of all trees on both
sides of West 50th Street, between Wooddale and Halifax. Not only is the Arcade a
superb visual resource, but elimination of the trees would cause irreparable
damage to adjacent properties, as a glance at 50th Street east of France Avenue
illustrates. According to the consultants, current traffic flows do not justify
widening the street, and there is no expectation of future increases in traffic.
The only reason to increase the roadway width would be to qualify for State Aid
reimbursement. However, there is a variance process, which can be used to
exempt the roadway section from wider standards. In any event, West 50th is not
the only city street eligible for State Aid funding, and thus the City will not lose
funding if 50th east of Wooddale is not reimbursed through the state aid program.
Wooddale School -
The Board's February 4, 1985 Recommendations to the Council emphasize that our
position is based upon economics, not sentiment. However, despite the School's
city -wide fiscal importance, we very much believe that whatever is done on the
site should not detract from the Country Club neighborhood. We would be unable
to support creation of a sea of asphalt to service the structure, as outlined
schematically in the consultant's alternative "A" drawing. It was for this reason
that we stated our support for Alternative "B ", even at a cost to taxpayers of
nearly $100,000 to demolish a usable part of the building, should it be necessary
to supply 170 parking spaces.
However in the judgement of the professional members of the Board, the code
requirements applied to commercial structures may be too high a standard for
civic /public use. To test this possibility, we studied the actual usage at the Edina
Community Center, and found that the actual parking needs appear to be far less
than code requirements for commercial structures. The Center currently has 227
spaces, and 232 more are being added, for a total of 459 offstreet spaces. Since
the Wooddale School has 20.750 of the gross square footage of the Community
Center, and 22.280 of its net space, we multiplied the new Community Center total
of 459 spaces by 220, and found an apparent actual need of 101 spaces. This is
far less than the 171 spaces required by code for commercial structures, and
virtually the same as the 93 spaces shown in the consultant's Alternative "B"
diagram. Indeed, the additional eight spaces can be added without materially
changing that parking scheme.
Market
The Board and others addressed the issue of uses at the February 4th public
hearing. Clearly many uses exist for the building, several of which -- private
office space, senior citizen apartments, and the like -- have already been removed
as options due to opposition of some nearby residents. Still, it is undeniable that
the Community Center has turned away potential tenants due to lack of space.
However, the Board believes that Wooddale's greatest potential may be to relieve
overcrowding at City Hall. We applaud the City's traditional record of providing
excellent municipal government at the lowest possible cost. Still, it's clear that
additional space will be needed for police, parks, and the other very efficient
departments. Even if it were desirable to build additional wings on City Hall, the
construction cost of doing so would be at least S75 /s.f, and more if several very
small additions were undertaken. At today's somewhat lower interest rates, this
would cost taxpayers over $7 /s.f. /year just for debt service on new space.
In comparison, as the Council can see from the attached cash flow analysis, over
40,000 s.f. of renovated space is available in Wooddale School, at $4.25 /s.f. /yr for
debt service and operations, after completing "base line" renovations suggested by
the consultant.
Recommendation
Thus the Board feels it has no alternative but to continue its recommendation for
Alternative "A" for Wooddale School. Since the School has been on this site beyond
the memory of most of our citizens, it can hardly be considered an intrusion on
the neighborhood. Since the parking needs for civic uses appear to be much less
than the code requirements for commercial space, a large playing field can be
constructed for neighborhood use, while still providing ample parking. If the
Council chose to move the Park and Recreation Department into Wooddale School,
thus relieving overcrowding at City Hall, a combination gym /auditorium and park
could be developed as a superb year- around recreation facility.
We recognize nothing less than razing this structure would satisfy some of our
fellow citizens, and the Board regrets it is unable to support their position. But
given the costs of demolition, the loss of a million - dollar public asset, and the long
term costs of new construction to meet various city and public needs, we find no
way of justifying large tax expenditures to provide a pastoral setting for adjacent
property owners.
And while the neighborhood does need better recreational facilities, we can hardly
agree that this beautiful area, set along almost a mile of Minnehaha Creek, with
Browndale and Utley Parks, and superb, sweeping, tree -lined streets, is in any
way deficient in passive green space.
So the Board encourages the Council to retain Wooddale School for public use, and
to develop much needed, active recreation uses on the site. In this way the City
can address the real needs of the neighborhood, within the context of the larger
community of Edina.
oiect: Civic
Nooddale School
Edina, Minnesota
Allocated Percent of Expenses
104%
Startino Date
Nov -85
INTERIM FINANCING
----
- - - - --
Period Endinq
May -86
Nov -86
May -87
Nov -87
May -88
Oct -88
May -89
Nov -89
May -90
Nov -90
Land Purchase
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Contract for Property
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Desiqn Fees
10000
10000
5000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Structural Testinq
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Survey and Soils
0
U
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Environmental
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Miscellaneous Consultants
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Leqal Fees
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Placement Fees
0
0
U
0
0
)
0
0
0
0
Broker
0
0
U
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
Marketino and Pre -lease
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.vket Study
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
insurance
250
750
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Ad Valorem Taxes
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Construction Mqmt
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Construction Draw
--
160000
- - - -
314000
50000
Total Period Expenses
-- --
170250
- - - - -- --
324750
- - - - -- --
55000
- - - - -- --
0
- - - - -- --
0
- - - - -- --
0
- - - - -- --
0
- - - - -- --
0
- - - - -- --
0
- - - - --
0
Interim interest 9.5%
8087
23897
27b44
29457
0
0
U
0
0
Draw Fee 0.01
--
0
- - - - -- --
0
- - - - -- --
0
- - - - --
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Gross Period Draw
170250
332837
--
78897
- - - - -- --
27644
- - - - -- --
28957
- - - - -- --
0
- - - - -- --
0
- - - - -- --
0
- - - - -- --
0
- - - - --
0
Cumulative Draw
170250
503087
581984
609628
638585
0
0
0
0
0
Carry to Permanent
638585
0
0
7] ----------------------------------------
CO MBINED (PERMANENT + INTERIM) FlItGNICINS
RENTAL INCOME SCHEDULE STARTIN6 NOV. 88
LESSEE SO. FT. f /SF /YR X INCR VAC YR I VAC YR 2 VAC YR 3 VAC YR 4+
Office 42790 4.25 5X 30% 5X 5X 5%
OPERATING EXPENSES SCHEDULE
Real Estate Taxes
0
Property Insurance
7390
Property Maintenance
60750
Power
38500
Water and Sewer
1300
Legal and Accounting
2500
110440
'fear Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
4
10
Period Ending
May-87
May -88
May -89
May -90
May -91
May -92
Mav -93
Mav -94
May -95
May -96
Rental Income
181858
190950
200498
210523
221049
232.101
243706
255892
268686
282121
Less Vacancy Allowance
54557
-- - - - - -- --
9548
- - - - --
10025
10526
11052
11605
12185
12795
13434
14106
Effective Rental Income
127300
--
181401,
- - - - -- --
190473
- - - - -- --
199991
- - - - -- --
209996
- - - - -- --
220496
- - - - -- --
231521
- - - - -- --
243097
- - - - --
255252
-- - - - - --
268015
.,,erating Expenses
Management Fee iX ERI)
1X 1273
1814
1905
2000
2100
2205
2315
2431
2553
2680
Ooeratino ExptAnn incr)
5X 110440
-- - - - - -- --
115462
- - - - -- --
121760
- - - - -- --
127848
- -
134241
140953
148000
159.400
163179
171329
Net Operating Income
15587
53621
66808
- - -- --
70149
- - - - -- --
73656
- - - - -- --
77339
- - - - -- --
81206
- - - - -- --
85266
- - - - -- --
89529
- - - - --
94006
ENITY SCHEDULE
First Mortgage Term: 25
Principal Rate:13.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Principal Repaid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p
Interest Paid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Second Mortgage Term: 25
Principal Rate:14.50% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Principal Repaid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Interest Paid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6. 0. bonds Term: 25
Principal Rate: 9.50% 650000 642876 635076 626535 617182 606941 595726 583447 570000 555277
Principal Repaid 7124 7800 8541 9353 10241 11214 12280 13446 14724 16122
Principal Deferred
Interest Paid 61750 61073 60332 59521 58632 57659 56594 55427 54150 52751
interest Deferred
CASH FLOW - - - --
Funds Provided
No Permanent Financing_ 650000
From CDBG 54400 0
From Sales Equity 0
Net Operating income 15587 67.627 66808 70149 73656 77339 81206 85266 89529 94006
Funds Used
From Interim Financing 638585 0 0 0
Debt Service 68874 68874 68874 68874 68874 68874 68874 68874 68874 68874
Net Cash Flow 12529 -5247 -2065 1275 4782 8465 12332 16392 20656 25132
Debt Coverage Ratio 0.23 0.92 0.97 1.02 1.07 1.12 1.18 1.24 1.30 1.36
It
I am enclosing materials to substantiate the information
I submitted to you for the February 5th meeting. Since I will
be out of town for the March 3rd meeting, I have asked Marilyn
Curtis to answer any questions you might have at the council
meeting.
A new development that seems to impact on future uses for
1ooddale is the need for new School Administration offices. Since
Dr. Lieber is leaving the School District, there seems to be many
open ended questions in that direction.
It is my hope that any decisions you make regarding Wooddale
will be the right ones both for now and the future. Thank you
for the many hours you have had to expend deliberating on so
controversial an issue.
Donna Skagerberg
n
February 15, 1985
Mrs. Donna Skageberg
6001 Killarney Lane
Edina, MN 55436
Dear Mrs. Skageberg:
In regard to the potential availability of ;office and program space
in the former Wooddale school building,,please be advised that this
organization continues to investigate options for alleviating the
crowded conditions which exist at our current site at the Creekside
Community Center in Bloomington. In addition, we are always interested
in improving our services to the citizen's of.Edina. One way of doing
this, of course., is by decentralizing our services to make them more
accessible to persons living in each municipality. Therefore, the
Wooddale site could be of possible use to us in achieving this objective,
and we would be interested in pursuing this matter further with you and
other involved parties.
Thank you for bringing us up to date on this situation; we look forward
to hearing from.you regarding further developments.
Sincerely,
Thomas J. Esser
Executive Director
TJE:cp
I
9801 Penn Avenue South • Room 100 • Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 • (612)888 -5530
Minneapolis :�i -Mondays. -;
February 18/1985
mob"
Barbara, Viso-t
Flanagan,r�
Just when I thought the Nicollet-.,,
ma was forever bloomftl& pliiii for
%e Norwed Tower office/reta44
npiez were zapped.;.
'After Norw . e" C" and Okforor,.. !,
,properties decided hot.tli' cooperate.
..'od-developing the block betwee&G*
and 7th Sts. on the Malh people
called to comment What upset,theM i
r-most vW,the possible loid of a'
.FM Avenue store. A Salis,b;;;W116-,
was planned for 7th,SL and Ule:M4 I
Many suggested that .we'persuae,j
Saks to settle sornewhiie else
�downtown. Some agreed with
:.qUat the Young Q@Wan store,
building would !be an excellent 114K.,
.0fters thought•city officials sh6uws
,force Oxford to build the Saks Storet
on the MaUss-planned90ItcW.0Pkn
,on schedule in 1987.,
There Is no question OW the CRY
% Council must move fag to
`N[&Uet Mall-developil�'-
posltiv6tstep *ould be tai help
Tot"llet going with the,.,
conservatory, the retail comP6di
has proposed
for the mail betw"O_
'8th and 9th Sts., Its Immediate
-development Is crucial'to the-futUM'
of the Mail as out main retail stredc
I don't know 011ie city has any',. I,;•r.
rower over OxfordL.It certil*. *"l
Adn-t-wh . 6n My center . was b
-there would be a -driveway with a'
cabstand in front of the AmfaciQ
'and at least two Movie,theatets in..:
..the complex to replace those that=
w, were razed.
It's interesting to note that few..,.�.
fault NorweSt for the cia�
'Excitibi" yes, but "recreational?"-
people
in plans. Oxford is the villain
For whom? It i will be a muggers'
preference. In fact, Oxford's IMW paradise unless the city pays for
problem In Minneapolis May ne vpk-1
extra police officers to protect the
W:1.14P-1
improve unless it reopens the.. .."T"
.observation deck atoP'the,WS* 11. t
unwary.
Ar. IT
Originally Nicollet Island wis.",
developed as a residintial
Me&nwhile,•Clty officials and
neighborhood. It remains so today la
downtown bobders have work 10 d
spite of attempts to wreck it.
'It the Nicollet Mall isn't healft'; *
won't- be; iftther.-Untp
riho'
What the city. should do is add 'roi
the Mall blooms again, there isn't" -
compatible housing to the is1aRLW
hope for a rejuvenated Hennepf##-
help island residents. Improve the
Itestoring both avenues should.
historic houses still stand.
the top priority of the City Couht%".
r
A well-populated Island
,the Downtown council and the -14
Chamber of Commerce. 1 .110pi iii
neighborhood of tax-paying residots!
provides a measure of safety to t6i
.started last Week.
visitors who might use the adjacent.
-;r.-vA4
public open space: —^
'will
Only then C6unblimai6 Cramer,,
. The tur . orovir the Norwest/6=
those "exciting" recreational
decision overshadowed anOth
opportunities that you favor reft
disappointing development 1:1=
have a chance to flourish.
— the city Council's vote to
demolish some historic buil='.,P
the south end of Nicollet 1111
The HennepinCounty Historl"N
-Society wanted to create a, celo,
interpret the city's beginnings there;
but the park Board wants to de4616P
the site as open space The society's ,'
plan wins W01 e d,.. unfortunately.
Every tlme eiected officlib'destroyj,
history I crino ailittij.-I jistirde','V0 ' u -
see; that th'e;lmportince-of hls;wrkc:�
sites on the.jrb4n scene Is better-
underst6od1oday1fiall-Itwils when
,, ;.I `public jerv�ktserjw&thefabled
M et ropoiltan Building -'a WAW a*
with glass floors at 3rd St. and
S.
,
OX, so I'm naive about jwlltldans.
,Vor the record; Council Mefnbe
f' ;Kathy olprle.a, Tony Scallon; SHOD
Coyle, Sharon Sayies-Belton and .'0'
Joan Nienliec voted to preserve the
f1dand buildings as had been
recommended to the Park B" bt
4"webitectural experts... b
Counill .Member. Steve, Cram
F,,°;who voted to destroy the buildidg%
said, "We, can provide an exciting
rec:reatIdna1 oppo rtunity there.?
". ,." The National' Register' and
I-ocal Historical Societies
Denais Gimmeatad
One'of the challenges in
interpreting local history
is presenting an appropriate
mix of the "big picture"
with local happenings.
General historical trends
must be presented to provide
broader meaning, while the
local manifestation gives a
concrete dimension to those
trends and establishes a
genuine local identity.
Historic buildings help
provide a keen sense of the
specific in the local story
by defining the environment
where events took place and
where people lived and
worked. Buildings are also
artifacts in themselves
whose characteristics il-
ustrate general trends in
how people have ordered
and constructed their sur-
roundings.
Over the past decade,
the State Historic Preser-
vation Office (SHPO) at the
Minnesota Historical Society
has been surveying the state
to locate and document his -
tonic properties which have
important links to Minne-
sota's history. To date,
over two- thirds of the
state's eighty -seven coun-
ties have been surveyed,
resulting in the recording
of over twenty -six thousand
A properties on the state in
�'..•:.: -,;, w;ventory. The: most signifi-
`.. ;:cant of these have been
.4:nominated to the National
" "'r; Register of Historic Places.
+`�6Y.V �. ..
The National Register is
-,a listing of properties
significant in architecture,
history, archaeology, engi-
neering, and culture. It
v is maintained by the Na-
"" tional Park Service and ad-
fit
The criteria of the National Register recognizes
properties of historical significance (for example,
the Sinclair Lewis Boyhood ]come in Sauk Center, top)
and properties of architectural significance (for
example, the Detroit Lakes ] ?ublic Library, Claude and
Stark, architects, bottom).
ministered in each state Dennis Gimmestad is as-
by a State Historic Preser- sistant state preservation
vation Office. (In Minne- officer at the Minnesota
sota, the.SHPO happens to Historical Society.
(Continued on Page Four)
3
ational Register and
Historical Societies
" '. "controlled museum environ-
ment to ensure their pres-
ervation. In addition,
myriad environmental and
political forces often con-
' ,.
:: stitute a. formidable threat.
Eligibility'to the Register
helps to assure that federal
agencies take these prop-
erties into account in their
planning activities and
make attempts to avoid ad-
verse impacts upon them.
But unless local governments
and, most importantly, prop-
erty owners are committed-,-
to the preservation of
these structures,.their fu-
ture remains tenuous.
Local Heritage Preserva-
tion Commissions (HPC'S) in
Minnesota can designate
coperties locally (many
operties are listed both
- ocally and on the National
.,Register). In most cases,
f;- these designated properties
are protected by the com-
mission through building
permit review. Local ordi-
= '- ",nances creating HPC's are
i;
the best way to assure that
{
.:',,,.preservation .values are
considered during the' local
'~`=; "planning process. But even
•'FP "'' in communities where an HPC
;r ',"has not been established,
,.thelocal or• county histor-
'. :x icat.- society can increase
`s`'local. awareness of histor-
_
'-�', is buildings , and take a
+ ;stand' when those. structures
are threatened.-:It should
i, f. Abe' noted that a firm grasp
a property is.sig-
14, ;, ,nificant .is crucial when
� attempting to convince de-
.`<:P cision makers that' a build-
.,
should be preserved.
thout it, preservationists
"} duel nvariably accused of
1CX'�!'trying to save everything."
s
The local historical society
is in a key position to
keep the "history" of his-
toric preservation in focus.
Societies may further
aid the SHPO by assisting
in updating the state in-
ventory. Although the SHPO
staff makes every effort
to collect information-rel-
ative to activities and
changes to Register prop-
erties, it must rely on
local informants as well.
When new research appears
on some'aspect of a prop-
erty's history or when
local publicity develops on
a property, copies of this
material may be submitted
.to the SHPO for inclusion
in the inventory files at
Fort Snelling. This also
applies,.of course, to in-
stances where Register
buildings are drastically
altered or destroyed. The
SHPO can then remove such
properties from the Register
in a timely fashion.
Many of the above activ-
ities have been pursued by
county and local societies
throughout the state. Much
work needs to be done, how-
ever, to integrate the sig-
nificance of particular his-
toric buildings-into the
general story of a locality.
The SHPO welcomes dialogue
on future planning for such
'efforts.
For further information
or to order a-free copy of
The National Register of
Historic Places: Minnesota
Checklist, contact Dennis
Gimmestad, Fort Snelling
History Center, St. Paul,
MN 55111, (612) 726 -1171.
b.
.'t I
The National Register of
Historic Places: Minnesota
Checklist lists.all prop-
erties included on the Reg-
ister as of December 31,
1982. Update inserts list
those properties added dur-
ing 1983 and 1984. The
Checklist is available free
from the State Historic
Preservation Office-.
Nicollet County
Moves Collection
The Nicollet'County His-
torical Society has moved
to new quarters located on
the second floor of the
Central Community Education
Center at 300 S. Fifth
Street in St. Peter, MN
56082. New hours are 1:00
to 4:00 P.M. Tuesday,
Thursday, and Saturday.
y 's audio visual library
:same year by the same rail-
road company and were built
..up quickly, with many of
the same regional businesses
establishing local opera -
`tions along the rail line.
These characteristics may
be key factors in under-
standing how the personal -
ities of these towns differ
from perhaps a slower grow-
ing Minnesota community
established in the 1850s
by one ethnic group.
The following suggestions
outline ways to use build -
ings as artifacts in county
-and local historical society
programs
.17d
3. Marking programs. Mark-
ing historic properties has
the advantage of publicizing
historic buildings to the
"person.on the street" who
would otherwise be unaware
'of their existence. How-
ever, the markers them -
selves, if not carefully
designed,' can become an in-
trusive element setting the
historic buildings apart as
monuments rather then pre-
senting them as integral
parts of a community.
Organizations interested
in markers should check
with David Nystuen of the
MHS Field Services Depart-
:'4
located at 690 Cedar Street
in St. Paul. Prints are
available for a fee. Nega-
tive code numbers for prop-
erties may be obtained from
the SHPO.
County and local histori-
cal societies may help the
SHPO by becoming preserva-
tion advocates. The phi-
losophy of the National
Register program is to pre-
serve significant buildings
that tell a good deal about
our past. Unlike manu-
scripts or smaller arti-
facts, however, most build-
ings cannot.be placed in a
National Register and
local Historical S
Societies
be a department of the Min - 1
1. Walking or driving tours.. m
ment to insure proper coor-
nesota Historical Society.) I
In cities with historic dis- d
dination wit .t a state
The Register also lists im- t
tricts or high concentra- m
marker program. Also, the
portant groupings of prop- t
tions of individual historic S
St. Paul Heritage Preserva-
.;.
erties.as historic dis- b
buildings, walking tours t
tion Commission has re
Those properties h
have T
Gently instituted a plaque
',,.`4..'.. i
in Minnesota which have u
ular.' Driving tours can p
program and may be able to
been placed on the Register; c
cover a large area of a o
offer advice. Contact Tom
'•; a
are listed in the Minnesota c
city or a portion of a coun- Z
Zahn, St. Paul Heritage
Checklist, available free t
ty. An important but often P
Preservation Commission,
from the Minnesota SHPO. o
overlooked element of a, C
City Hall Annex, 11th Floor,
Individual files on the g
good tour is an introductory 2
25 W. 4th Street, St. Paul,
:.listed.properties are main- d
discussion of the historical M
MN 55102, (612) 292 -1577.
tained at the Fort Snelling b
background of the featured 4
4. Museum interpretation.
•:� ;
History Center in St. Paul. s
sites immediately before M
Many museum exhibits or
;,
•t^ t
the, tour or at a separate,
programs can be made more
Throughout p
earlier sesison. Many .., m
meaningful to the observ-
s`—emphasis h
has been placed on g
groups have used these tours e
er if linked to existing
developing an understanding a
as successful fund raisers. h
historic buildings. For
of..the history of each coun-
example, an exhibit on
s e
qty '`'and then locating struc- 2
2. Site Brochures. -A vari- r
railroad history might fea-
tures which illustrate that a
ation on walking and driv- t
ture both photos of build -
''.w. h
history,`rather than simply i
ing tours may be achieved i
ings built by the railroad
concentrating on the most w
self-
company (depots, section
•'ornamental.and picturesque g
guided tours that can be h
houses, etc.) and those
_t�• •
buildings .',.In Redwood t
taken at one s convenience. c
constructed as a result of
"Co nt ;'forexam le, two -
- crafted tour
ain, wellu
the presence of the rail
identical brick bank build- b
brochures present not only r
road (line grain elevators,
ings in the small communi- d
detailed information on the h
hotels, etc.).
ties 'of'.Milroy and Clements s
sites themselves but also
are not remarkable build- e
emphasize the over -all N
Negatives for photos of
ings in themselves, but s
story, including the histor- m
most Register buildings in
they do show that these two- i
is relationships of the M
Minnesota are kept at the
towns ware platted the s
sites to one another. M
Minnesota Historical Soci-
' e
et y
:same year by the same rail-
road company and were built
..up quickly, with many of
the same regional businesses
establishing local opera -
`tions along the rail line.
These characteristics may
be key factors in under-
standing how the personal -
ities of these towns differ
from perhaps a slower grow-
ing Minnesota community
established in the 1850s
by one ethnic group.
The following suggestions
outline ways to use build -
ings as artifacts in county
-and local historical society
programs
.17d
3. Marking programs. Mark-
ing historic properties has
the advantage of publicizing
historic buildings to the
"person.on the street" who
would otherwise be unaware
'of their existence. How-
ever, the markers them -
selves, if not carefully
designed,' can become an in-
trusive element setting the
historic buildings apart as
monuments rather then pre-
senting them as integral
parts of a community.
Organizations interested
in markers should check
with David Nystuen of the
MHS Field Services Depart-
:'4
located at 690 Cedar Street
in St. Paul. Prints are
available for a fee. Nega-
tive code numbers for prop-
erties may be obtained from
the SHPO.
County and local histori-
cal societies may help the
SHPO by becoming preserva-
tion advocates. The phi-
losophy of the National
Register program is to pre-
serve significant buildings
that tell a good deal about
our past. Unlike manu-
scripts or smaller arti-
facts, however, most build-
ings cannot.be placed in a
e
performing
orts
center
edkno
Fq*ORMING ARTS CENTER IN EDINA EdNA COMMUNITY CENTER
S704 SAND OF ROAD DINA MINNESOTA 5MU
The Performing Arts Center in Edina is a program of Edina Community Education
that offers quality classes for people of all ages, in music, dance and theater.
We offer private voice lessons, tap and ballet, creative movement, and a variety
of theater classes and workshops that often culminate in performances.
On January 25th, 1984, the Performing Arts Center in Edina sent a letter to the
Edina City Council indicating that Wooddale School would be an appropriate space
for performing arts activities. We would like to again inform you that the
auditorium, the gym and classrooms at Wooddale would be conducive to the kinds
of activities we offer through the PACE program.
Thank you,
Alice Randall
TO: DONNA
CONCERNING: WOODDALE SCHOOL
FROM: SCOTT CROSBIE AND THE FIRST JOHN PHILIP SOUSA MEMORIAL BAND.
WOODDALE SCHOOL IS A GOOD SPACE FOR US. THE FRONT ACCESS IS ACTUALLY
BETTER FOR OUR EQUIPMENT LOADING /UN- LOADING THAN CITY HALL. THE STAGE
HAS EXCELLENT ACOUSTICS, AND THERE ARE STORAGE CABINETS EXISTING IN THE
STAGE RIGHT WINGS WHICH ARE SUITABLE FOR PERCUSSION AND MUSIC STORAGE.
THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE STAGE ITSELF IS SUPERIOR EVEN TO EDINA HIGH SCHOOL'S
FICK AUDITORIUM IN THAT IT IS CONSTRUCTED IN SUCH A WAY THAT A SLIGHT
AMOUNT OF GIVE OR "BOUNCE" IS FELT WHEN JUMPED ON, WHICH MAKES IT EXCELLENT
FOR DIFFERENT FORMS OF DANCE. THE STAGE IS ALSO HOLLOW (NOT LAYED OVER
POURED CONCRETE) AND ACTS AS A RESONATOR WHICH MAKES IT EXCELLENT FOR TAP
AS WELL AS MUSICAL GROUPS.
CHANGES NEED TO BE MADE, BUT THE OLD EXISTING STRUCTURES ARE A GOOD
START.
ED W
1HFATRE
COMPANY
5701 Normandale Road Edina, Minn. 55424
February 27, 1985
Edina City Council
_Qunic ipal` Building:
Edina, Minnesota, 554.24
Dear Council :'.embers:
On behalf of the Edina Theatre Company, I would like to
make some comments on the fate of the old. 400ddale School. We
realize that the Edina Community Center serves many in the
community, but most of the use of the facility is educational.
In our case, as a provider of entertainment, and as the only
community theatre in our city, we have problems which cannot
be solved. as long- as we function out of the center.
We are bepinninr to think in terms of "lack of," rather
than in positives. Among the negatives are constar.,t problems
with security, parkin_, -, stora.-e, equiptment, and_ finances.
Even though we now have a key to the sTall theatre at the
center, it is used frequently by others who do not lock up
after using the area. We have been vandalized and robbed
enough times to have this be a leFitamate concern.-with no
apparent solution in.sirht.
On weekrltohts, we compete for parking- spaces with Adult
Educatior classes, etc.. On Friday and Saturday performance
nights, we have to share parkin- with participants in sports,
social, and other everts from Luthern Hirh, Edina HiFh and
others.. Our loss of revenue is siVnificant; many advance
ticket reservations are never even picked up.
Each time we move our props, flats, etc., into an assigned
storage area, that area is rented out, and we have to move again.
Currertly, we are sharing space with Luthern HiFh and FACE, and
security is mirimal. Again, there is no solution at the center.
de have purchaserl some high tech equiptment and would like
to exp�2rd it this area, but we have no secure place to store
what we buy. Our expensive p.a. system "lives" in one of my
bedrooms between shows. LivhtinF equiptment is moved from the
little theatre to the auditorium at the whim of the current
renter. '.Ve ha -.re to raid. to retreive
iloorlOale School would solve many of our problems and'_ could
become a permanent home for the Edina Theatre Company. Unless
we can get outside fun.d.inF of considerable magnitude, we are
not only endar_ {rered., but probably will f --o dark after our SprinF-
show, but even if we car get this fun(lin.-, it still will not
address our other problems. The ,Jooer° ale School could. save
,,s;
"uildin parking- is adequate for our cast, crew, and aud-
ience on performing ni-hts. The theater is equipted with per-
manent lif.htir; -- There are classrooms that coulr_': be used for
the storage o_f props and costumes, and we could find, an area
in the building- for a workshop for building sets.
Ae have no idea what monetary reimbursement the city
would. expect from us for using- this facility, but I doubt
that it could be worse than -what we are presently fac,inp. ; i.e.
almost 300'''. increase in payment for rehearsal space, a sub-
stantial increase it performance night rents, plus the hii - -h
wares for janitorial presence on Saturday nights, a fee which
is non- ne-otiable since it is set by the union.
We hope you.will consider our plifht when making- the
recision on dooddale School. 4e believe that the community
as a whole would. benefit from having us continue, particularly
since we could expand our services if we could. use the school.
The ori:7inal Edina C ommur.ity .Theatre went dark many years aF--o ;
let's not let it happen apain!
Thank you for any consideration you extend us.
Sincerely,
Ann Johnston
President, Edina Theatre Company
Enclosure
EDINP,
ice
1HEgTRE
COMPANY
5701 Normandale Road Edina, Minn. 55424
August 10, 1984
Mr. Douglas Johnson
Edina Community Center
5701 Normandale Road
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mr. Johnson:
The Edina Theatre Company Board of Directors is extremely concerned about
the recent increase in rental fees for Community Center use which we be-
came aware of accidentally, through a routine reservation confirmation.
As a non - profit organization which is relatively new in the community, our
financial position is extremely precarious, and the dramatic rate increase
which has been instituted may force us to disband.
The Edina Theatre Company Board of Directors would like to request your
assistance in reconsideration of your fee schedule, and will be happy to
meet with the Facilities Committee to present our position whenever
possible.
The key factors in our request include the following:
1) Theatre companies traditionally plan their season one year in
advance. ETC' received no advance notice of the rental increase,
and obviously-has already planned the budget for the '84 -85
season, based on our previous schedule of charges.
2) The rental fees quoted to us reflect an increase significantly
greater than the 15 to 40% you stated to us in your letter of
August 2, 1984.' Comparing the projections for our fall pro-
duction with our comparable production in fall, 1983, the new
fees, including a charge for rehearsal time mean an increase of
almost 300 %. This does not include the maintenance fee which
we pay for sole building use.
3) The Edina Theatre Company does not have the option of increasing
ticket revenue to cover the - additional cost of space charges.
Our ticket prices of $5.00 for adults, $4.00 for seniors and
students, are similar to those charged by other community
theatres, including highly respected theatre groups, such as
Theatre In the Round Players, and any increase would impact
negatively on our ability to attract an audience. The number
of seats in the theatre obviously cannot be increased. Our
fall 1983 production, "I Remember Mama" generated $1,830.00
in ticket income. Costs of production for "I Remember Mama"
Mr. Douglas Johnson -2- August 10, 1984 .
were $1,898.74, including space rental fees of $280.00.
Obviously, time spent in rehearsal generates no revenue;
all is collected post-performance.
4) The space utilized by ETC for rehearsals and performances
receives virtually no maintenance services from Community
Center staff except that the floor is cleaned immediately
prior to our opening performance. ETC volunteers take care.
of everything else, including sweeping, cleaning sinks,
finding towels and moving garbage to the hall for pick up.
5) As you know, we continue to have security problems in the
theatre; most frequently we have found locks broken on
storage cupboards, doors open and, during performances this
winter and spring, found essential props missing prior to
virtua lly every performance.
If more time were available prior to the institution of.the rental fee
increase, the Edina Theatre Company would be able to investigate other
income sources and begin fund - raising activities to supplement pro-
duction income. Unfortunately, this process, as you well know,
would take much longer than the few weeks remaining prior to our uti-
lization of the theatre.
The Board of Directors feels strongly that the Edina Theatre Company
has substantially grown in recognition within the metropolitan theatre
community over the past few years. Many of the area's most prominent
directors now are contacting us and desire to work with the Edina
Theatre Company. Our audience, however, continues to be made up
primarily of Edina residents.
We recognize that the necessary process of rental fee review may require
consideration of our position within the Edina community. We would
appreciate expeditious resolution of this concern.
Very truly yours,
Ann Johnston, President
Board of Directors
EDINA THEATRE-COMPANY
i
i
y 6
jo
r� ,
2 -2 -g,-
To Members of the Edina City Council:
This letter is in regard to the upgrading of 50th Street between Highway 100 and
Halifax Avenue South, and.the future of Wooddale School.
After attending the Council meeting on February 4th, I am sure you are aware of
the frustration of the people who live in the Country Club District. I live on
Sunnyside Road at Bruce Avenue. I was pleased to learn at that meeting that it
was the BRW Firm that did the "job" on us in Country Club when they redesigned
50th and France. The traffic increased dramatically on our streets, in particular
on Sunnyside Road, since the completion of that "choke hold" they put on 50th
at France.
After looking at the proposals by BRW for 50th street, I am convinced there is a
secret agenda to shift as much traffic as possible through the Country Club.
To start with they smooth out the curve on Browndale just east of the creek so that
traffic can go faster and more conveniently. All the recommended turn lanes going
north are for convenience not of the residence of Country Club, but those who wish
to use us as a short cut to downtown Minneapolis.
When you take a look at the traffic counts, and I don't have them in front of me, I
believe there was a change of almost four thousand vehicles in the area of the
Browndale and Wooddale intersection. You know as well as I that not all of this is
going south on Wooddale, it is going north through the Country Club.
The proposed changes even make the Wooddale intersection a more significant inter-
change to encourage traffic into the Country Club District.
It doesn't appear to me that any serious consideration was given to reducing the
number of roads that enter 50th street. Between and including Grange Road and
Eden Avenue there are four entrances onto 50th, I cannot see the need for three of
the four. Sure they are convenient, but I see no reason for the existence of Eden
Avenue entering 50th. There is a traffic semaphore at Grange, use that to control
the traffic into the City Hall /Library area and seal off the other two entrances in
front of those buildings.
I would strongly recommend that the road going into the tennis court /pool area of
Edina Country Club, and I am a member there, be turned into a one way going into the
Club and no exit be allowed at that point. The way the traffic flys down the hill
from the west it is almost suicide exiting into 50th at that point. There are three
exits to Wooddale for Club members to use, that should be very adequate.
At the east end of 50th street you have got the bank and post office using the
entrance into a parking lot as though it was another major street. I would seal that
off or at best make it an exit to 50th out of the parking lot. When the bank was
allowed to build their large drive -up facility there should have been adequate provisions
made for that increased traffic flow. I would recommend widening Halifax north of 50th
and easing the curve at Clancy's parking lot. That would mean the bank would lose its
lawn on the east side of its building, but I think that is a small price to pay, their
front lawn would still look very nice. I feel this would not only help to relieve the
traffic at that intersection, but could also encourage traffic that wishes to go north
on France to use the north Halifax route as the south Halifax route behind Lund's
serves the south bound France traffic by reducing the number of cars turning south
at the 50th and France intersection. The widening of north Halifax may also serve
to reduce the traffic that enters the Country Club as a short cut to downtown.
I think your decision is to either make 50th a major thoroughfare which may take
out some trees and should require widening the street at 50th and France. Or, 50th
should be narrowed to the point of making 50th street not a desired street to use
if you want to go somewhere fast and without effort. Basically, I feel I would
improve 50th within its existing boundaries, cut down the number of roads entering
it and discourage improvements to Browndale and Wooddale that would make them more
convenient to use for transient traffic into the Country Club.
The second topic is what to do with Wooddale School. My instinct favors the plan
for total demolition.-'I do not think any commercial use of the building would be
desirable. If improvements are made to the site allowing for more parking, I
certainly think the church should be willing to pay for part of its construction
and maintenance.
Dougl s D. espie
4115 si Road
Edina, Minne
February 20, 1985
The Honorable Mayor C. Wayne Courtney
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mayor Courtney:
This is to support staff recommendations for 50th Street and Utley Park
redevelopment, with two reservations:
1. There be a more definitive exploration of the possible self supporting
uses of Wooddale School.
2. If the School is not to be rented or leased, the BRW recommendation for
a monument should be accepted by the City Council.
The first reservation is based on the absence of a persuasive case by the
city that the building is not an asset that can provide stlf supporting
benefit to the city.
The second reservation expresses a conviction that our heritage is worth
the miniscule $2,000 per year to maintain it.
The arguments that the entire building should be raised to maximize play
area is not persuasive. As one whose four children were quite well served
by the play area and facilties of Wooddale School, an expansion while nice
is not critical. While I as a past President of the Wooddale Neighborhood
Council commend the Council for its diligence in producing a list of
playgound advocates, I would not have signed the petition if I had been
asked to do so. A smaller Wooddale School or a monument would permit quite
attractive playground space and facilities.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the difficult decisions to be
made by the City Council.
Sincerely, -1114elaa
Bright M. Dornblaser
4630 Drexel Avenue
Edina, MN 55424
BMD:mc
- - - -- - - -- -- ... %i,�re �g - -- witG�cl�u� .may hv�e Q►•�c� g.�c /o� ce
c4uee;a- - - - --
// u5 � Scyool O
ti
--
cYW/ n���� -e/ _.J�uf ,.vas
- 112
- -r�41,11� - - -- -
� � C1cv� �..�.. �- s.0 `� (Zs -�o•r� t�, us(��a� -�, p
W0000 ";_E S "COL SITE
February 20, 15�, I �iGZrt.C.e K�(� Vm�On
23., �
6s )s rv%o— 64,,,, Oz . �. - q 5-5-434,
Dear City Council Members and Mayor:
I thought the recommendations made
by the city staff, park board and
consultants at the city council
meeting on Feb. 4th were fiscally
sound and require that you as -
members of the council follow those ..
recommendations to serve the best
interests of all the people in
Edina.
Sincerely,
t
t� 4'e
c
- -i. � � •Y � X11 -�y� �
b e
�! n
� dje
�l
4 i rJ J Y `,t
fir �3 �
� W1 EUc�
mbsmbsmbsmbsmbsmbsn
Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
I was pleased to hear the recommendations of the
park board, city staff and consultants regarding
the Wooddale School building.
I trust your vote on March 4 will reflect their
professional opinions.
Sincerely,
�d o
pd\my_ V or Ir L. Att
�jt s a4k& S; Ae
`I�Re soli ►ons Ake d
vh �e b y'�+_ are
SV 0115 'tom a,
�Y'O�I�MileZ 4tI e b 6 0
%40 6r dot' #*46
,�eovnrne�on s .
+t 614
-kit t *
kx4t.
�CdA e1au�
.yta �' -alonry Weu�
�d, n� mw ssaz�
February 15, 1985
1. To the Mayor and City Council Members,
We are hoping you will vote on March 4th to raze the
Wooddale School Building. The sentirrents of the
neighborhood were aptly expressed at the City Council
meeting of Feb. 4th. However, the over - riding
factor was the almost unanimous opinion of the
professionals the city hires and contracts with
to consider the site first and foremost a chance
for an addition to green space on the land
presently occupied by the building.
Sincerely,
� � 7N C�
Febrary 22, 1985
Mayor and City Council Members,
The park board, the city staff and the
consultants are wise in their recommendations
regarding the Wooddale School site.
I hope your vote on March 4th will reflect
their sentiments.
Sincerely,
l -
February 21, 1985
To the Mayor and City Council Memers,
As a taxpayer in Edina, I concur with the recommendations made
by the professionals to you at the Feb. 4th meeting regarding
The Wooddale Site.
It seems the issue has been discussed long enough and most
people concerned are anxious for a decision that reflects
the wishes of the neighborhood and represents fiscal
responsibility on your part. I want to urge you to vote to
follow the recommendations.
Sincerely,
February 15
Dear Mayor and City Council %rrbers,
I want to urge you to vote in keeping with the opinions of
the professional staff concerning the Wooddale School Building.
The results of the Febrary 4th meeting Wre encouraging to
the group of people vhio consider the last four years of
non -use and partial use a real problem to the community and
particularly the neighborhood.
Sincerely,
To the Mayor and City Council Members:
Re:Wooddale Site
I trust this is the last time I will be writinq to ynu on this issue.
Please vote March 4th in favor of the recommendations made to you by the
city staff, consultants and park board.
We in the neighborhood and especially those of us who are adjacent
property owners really feel it is in the best interests of all parties
to raze the building and create park space. We simply have not been shown
any NEED for keeping the building other than sentiment and emotion.
Keep in mind that we are sympathetic to those who have feelings about
keeping the building. As you know, the problems and expense of keeping
the building are not solved by feelings.
A general comment on the space needs of the city -- doesn't it make sense
for the school board and city council to co- operate and use all of the
existing Edina East building for our own community's needs rather than
rent it to people outside the community?
Thank you for your consideration and I trust you will make a sound
decision on the Wooddale Site.
Thank you.
Mary Kluesner
4409 Country Club Road
Edina, MN 55424
February 15, 1985
Dear Mayor and City Council Merrbers,
It was of interest to hear the results of the council rreetings on
February 4th regarding the Wooddale School Buildng. I concur
wholeheartedly with the opinions of the professional staff,
consultants, and your own local park board.
I trust you will follow their direction on the March 4th vote
Sincerely,
IL� t C
i
art
9 -
-43)
Rio
'm , , .I,, uv �k -v.vv -k� I
vall tu-/�
� - C2 5, - �r,s
-- ----------
'/Yvfs
. .............
ye------
------ -----
73 g,
r
4401 W. 50th St.
Edina, itiv 55424
Feb. 19, 1985
Dear Mir. Courtney,
We, as concerned residents of the Wooddale neighborhood, write
to express-.--our opinion that the Wooddale School building should not
be destroyed. Let us not be like other cities who have demolished
good buildings without good reason. We believe there are potential
needs for,this space and that it, as it stands now, is an asset to
the neighborhood where we have lived for almost fifteen years.
Again, don't mhoose to destroy Wooddale School.
Yours truly,
17
January 29,1985
Dear Councilmember,
What the 50th Street, Wooddale, Utley area needs is
a street without potholes and some green space to relieve
the high density and heavy traffic.
We would like 50th Street rebuilt in it's present width,
wider would take our trees, reduce the value of our homes,
more gas fumes to breath, no protection from the cars, trucks,
and the drunk drivers.
There was one drunk driver, nine years ago, that ran over
a 12 year old boy, in our back yard. The driver came through
our fence and pined the boy under the car. The boy spent
the summer in a body cast, broken leg, arm and ribs.
The drunk got two weeks in detox, of course He was unhurt.
On two other occasions drunk drivers wrapped their cars
around the trees on the boulevard, in front of our house.
If these trees were gone,the pedestrian and our home would
not have any protection.
We bought-our home in January 1964, raised three terrific
children,we're happy here.
We would suggest the following:
a. Rebuild 50th Street in it's present width
b. Raze Wooddale School and create a park
C. Do not build a $245,000 monument with $22000a
year maintance
d. Allow Utley Park to maintain in it's informal image
I urge you to be prudent in the decisions concerning
50th Street . Please carefully consider if some of the alternatives
are really necessary. Taxpayers already have a heavy burden.
Sincerely,
✓L, p 7 February 1, 1985
The question of how best to use the Wooddale property and Utley Park
is not a new question, but one which has been addressed in several ways in the
last ten years. In trying to gather information to help you come to a resolu-
tion of this issue, I hope that you will review some of the earlier informa-
tion relating to these areas.
First of all, I think it is important to refer back to the Open
Space Committee Report that was commissioned by the City of Edina in 1975.
That report concluded: "We recognize the needs of open space in both the East
Edina area and the Country Club area, so these areas should be of prime
importance in future considerations."
The lack of park space in the County Club area of Edina has always
been a problem, particularly in relationship to the density of houses here per
block and also because of the statistical makeup of the households; that is
the large number of young families with children that live in this area. If
anything, a greater inequity of park areas in Edina exists now than in in the
1970's due to the expansion of the Braemer facilities, Bredesen Park and the
establishment of Lewis Park, all in the Western part of Edina. I believe it
should be a top priority now to use this space for neighborhood park needs and
not to over develop these small tracts of land with monuments, excessive
blacktop parking areas, etc. that will further diminish the playground and
green areas.
I hope also that you will review the criteria established by the
Facility Use Advisory Committee for the uses of a facility when no longer
operated as a public school. One of their criteria is: "Where a school yard
is currently used in lieu of a public park for recreational purposes by the
neighborhood, this use shall not be diminished by the proposed re -use. Many
hours of research and study by members of the community went into these
reports at the request of the City and School District and I hope that the
City Council members will not disregard their reports.
I would also like you to consider how park uses at other neighbor-
hood parks have been determined in Edina. Twice in recent years, possible
park improvements or changes have been considered for Arden Park. The people
of that neighborhood met and voiced their opinions and the park was developed
according to their wishes. The first occasion was when a proposal was made to
put two tennis courts in there. The neighborhood was opposed to this and it
was not done. About one year ago, the city staff developed plans for a
blacktop parking area near the skating rink . The neighbors were firmly
opposed to it and wanted instead some guard posts and better lighting and this
is what was done at Arden. In both instances, these matters were not brought
before the City Council, but were decided simply at local meetings with
members of the Park and Recreation Department staff and the neighborhood. At
Arden Park quite clearly the neighborhood determined the best use of their
small park. I think the people of the Wooddale neighborhood also know best
the needs of their area and should be considered first and foremost in the
determination of this park area.
February 1, 1985
Page Two
About four years ago the Park Department staff met with Country Club
residents at Wooddale to discuss a plan to put in a large blacktop parking
area at Utley Park in conjunction with the canoe landing. The meeting was
well attended and there was unanimous disapproval because of the lack of green
space in the area. Last December, two public hearings were held at City Hall
for people to express their views about Wooddale and I think the majority of
residents expressed a desire for a park to be developed here.
It has been almost five years since Wooddale School closed and no
demand for space in this facility has been demonstrated. The Community Center
has excess space and is better equipped to handle organizations, etc. with all
the ensuing traffic and parking problems.
If this is a city that believes in grass roots involvement then I
hope the City Council members will listen to the neighborhood residents and
act accordingly.
Sincerely,
Joan Cornwell
JC /g
February 12, 1985
Philip F. Litchfield
5013 Wooddale Lane
Edina, Minnesota 55424
C. Wayne Courtney
Mayor
4313 Elton Place
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mr. Courtney:
After many conversations with other Edina residents
regarding the proposed 50th Street improvements I felt it an
obligation to advise you of my feelings. Without exception
everyone contacted, including myself, is strongly opposed to
the stand the council has taken regarding the improvements
to 50th street between Highway 100 and Wooddale Avenue.
It was obvious from the very fair and comprehensive
study made by the engineering firm hired by the City that
there is not a traffic problem in this area. I also travel
that section of 50th street twice per day at the heaviest
traffic periods and have never experienced a delay.
The costs to resurface the road are nominal. This
necessary improvement would correct any present problem but
would not cause an increase in congestion or traffic. The
construction of a four lane divided section from Highway 100
to Wooddale Avenue would result in problems in two areas;
First: it would increase the by -pass traffic to the north
and south on Wooddale Avenue through some of our nicest resid-
ential areas, Second: it would seriously increase traffic
problems in an already congested,'area at 50th and France'Ave.
To propose the four lane approach because in this way
the project would qualify for State or Federal funds makes
me wonder if you think we don't know where these funds originate.
Page 2
With the deficit.problems we have at the Federal level, I find
it incongruous that any responsible Municipal, State or Federal
body can place any priority on Federal expenditures which are
not an absolute necessity.
The change in the future to a four lane road can always
be considered if it ever becomes a necessity. The damages,
however, that could result from this 4 lane approach could never
be reversed and will result in 50th street eventually becoming
an arterial highway.
Please reconsider your position and keep the road in its
present condition with only the necessary resurfacing.
Yours truly,
/A" -/"
J �
P.S. Your propsal to eliminate the Wooddale School building
makes good economic sense and the area would provide an excellent
park.
RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL
FOR - DENN I S_ -MILLER =-ADD IT ION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City. Council of,..the City.of Edina, Minnesota, that that,
certain plat entitled "Dennis Miller Addition ", platted by `Jeffrey B. Stevenson
and Nancy A. Stevenson, husband and wife, and Dennis V. Miller and Janelle.K..'`
Miller, husband and wife; and City County Credit Union, a Minnesota corporation,
and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of March 18. 1985; -be
and is'hereby- granted final plat approval.
ADOPTED this 18th day of March, 1985.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting..City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the
Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 18, 1985, and as recorded
in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 3rd day of May, 1985.
City Clerk
IV M7,
It
Z
99
LANGFORD CT. FOUNTAIN WOOD
APTS. f
E D I N A WEST APTS,
a
J
m,
1
�i10p
`:rul.�i�
a - -
APEL MILL:
AT IONAL
t
LOT DIVISION19
NUMBER LD -85 -1 Irwin
LOCATION 6105 -07 Waterford Court
Lot 5, Block 1, The Habitat
r
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
LANGFORD
99
LANGFORD CT. FOUNTAIN WOOD
APTS. f
E D I N A WEST APTS,
a
J
m,
1
�i10p
`:rul.�i�
a - -
APEL MILL:
AT IONAL
t
LOT DIVISION19
NUMBER LD -85 -1 Irwin
LOCATION 6105 -07 Waterford Court
Lot 5, Block 1, The Habitat
r
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Lot Area= 24,168 V
'-louse , Garage -I-
Deck Area = 4 44o 9(
Covema�e 11.9 V.
l �
9
SO A.! 48 e
0 F
0o
all" 74
6,q 90
'o O
o -
o< off' �• __
O ('.!
in 48.00 / ,� -
,ti
/ ro
/ `v a
/
!,93
$e� 4 7 g
00 2 Stor \ /
\\
21 -4 _..
Top of Fa.nClat ;ona iOZ..Q :-
d' 8nsernewr. Floors 89:4,3
Ar 63.0 �� I C,ara9e F /eor. �o2.Q
/w. \ C I Proposed Eleva'Non S C
\9 EXisting El evwri or1 S
Asa w Dra�nas� D ;oIecr;o.v s —�
Deno-res Lo* Corners O
WATER F DR D i
31.32 �
C D UR T A1433 3 - 900 '
o ,E
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
I hereby certify that on -7/19 /a4- I surveyed the property described above and that
the above plat is a correct representation of said survey.
Calvin H. Hedlund, Minn. Reg. No. 5R�942_`
PT?gOT.TTTTnW
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land:
Lot 5, Block 1, THE HABITAT, City of Edina, Hennepin County, MN
and,
WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate
parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
Parcel A - The northeasterly 48.00 feet of Lot 5, Block 1, THE HABITAT,
according to the record plat thereof, City of Edina, Hennepin County,
Minnesota
and
Parcel B - That part of Lot 5, Block 1, THE HABITAT, lying southwesterly
of the northeasterly 48.00 feet thereof, according to the record plat
thereof, City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and
Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship
and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes
of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina
Ordinance Nos. 801 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land
is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801
and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance
thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose
or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision
that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance
with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval
of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 18th day of March, 1985.
IV0.2O� 8G 9K.�7��'
IRRY S. 10HNS0N COMPANIES, I III C.
40 1 WEST 79TH STREET
BLOOMINGTON. MINNESOTA 55420
PHONE (6121 884.5341
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
FOR
I
j°; `.
4, o
S
o_
/ +
Cf r
Zo/ 22 -� s
L o l 22 �;X �; � 510
✓Y
91��"N�/�".__.....
I
td"
L
ti1ri1��( //01� : 5�rve�r Fe r ro.•r>7 e_ �
Z- AKE
ADD / TIO 4/,
Jg 3J �\ 0 �9e ,7ole5 /,-on Plpo se �.
e,Deno1es %i'on 'P/'Pe 400'nn) i�P /QCe.
J hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of
the boundaries of:
Lot 22, Block 4, LAKE EDINA 2nd ADDITION, according to the recorded plat
thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
It also shows the location of a house located on the ove parcel. As surveyed
by me this 16th day of August, 1984.
j ar S /Jo n Vin, Land Surveyor
Minnesota Rg . No. 5065
NORT1 -}
PROPOSED LOT Div 1 S ►0�1 for
a.ND20t�1 1NG.
RON KRUEGER & ASSCCIATES, INC.
LAND SURVEYING ENGINEERING PLANNING
8140 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE • EDEN PRAIRIE MINNESOTA 55344 • PRONE 16121 941 -3030
SCALE REVISIONS_ - - --
DROWN BY GATE
_DR 'N CK'O
-J(56-No.-
OB NO. (o
SEC. T R BOOK PACE -- - - - - - - -- --
Ir<
I•I
�
�
I�
0
v
1
1I
OAK
LANE
NORT1 -}
PROPOSED LOT Div 1 S ►0�1 for
a.ND20t�1 1NG.
RON KRUEGER & ASSCCIATES, INC.
LAND SURVEYING ENGINEERING PLANNING
8140 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE • EDEN PRAIRIE MINNESOTA 55344 • PRONE 16121 941 -3030
SCALE REVISIONS_ - - --
DROWN BY GATE
_DR 'N CK'O
-J(56-No.-
OB NO. (o
SEC. T R BOOK PACE -- - - - - - - -- --
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE A
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: -Bob Kojetin, Director, Park and Recreation
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITE14 IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: February 28, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
Tree Trimming Bid
Quotations /Bids:
Company
(Tree size)
Amount of Ouote or Bid
1.
Arps Tree Service
12 "& Under
$8.00
Over
12"
- $30
17845 Wood Lake Dr.
Anoka, MN 554303
2.
Midwest Stump
12 "& Under
$20.00
Over
12"
- $54
Anoka, MN 55303
3.
Tri State Tree Service
12" & Under
$22.00
Over
12"
- $55.50
1509 W. 89th St.
Bloomington, MN 55431
4.
Davey (United Tree Service)
12" & Under
$23.00
Over
12"
- $55.00
117 S. Water St., Kent, Oho 44240 .
Department Recommendation:
Arps Tree Service
Finance Director's Endorsement
The recommended bid is \--""'is not
Departmen
within the amount budget for the purchase.
. a. uaien, rinance Director
C7_7 aaer's Endorsement: U
I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director, Park and Recreation
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: February 26, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
TORO Groundsmaster 72 - New model 9327 with 72" float deck for Park Dept.
Quotations /Bids:
Company
1 MTI Toro Distributing Co.
14900 21st Ave. N.
Mpls., MN 55441
2 Reinders Brothers, Inc.
13400 Watertown Plank Rd.
Elm Grove, Wis 53122
�. Long Lake Ford Tractor
2073 W. Hwy. 12
Long Lake, MN 55356
Department Recommendation:
MTI Toro Distributing
Finance Director's Endorsem /ent.
The recommended bid is ✓
Amount of Quote or Bid
$ 5,386
$ 11,485
$ 6500
Department
is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
/ �.,. iv, uaien, rinance uirector
City�Manaaer's Endorsement:
I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
9 . I recomnend as an alternative:
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members
FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: AWARD OF BIDS
DATE: March 1, 1985
We are recommending that the bids we received for administrative
sedans be rejected due to the fact that the bids exceeded our budgeted
amount for administrative vehicles.
KR /sw
Attachment
s
i \L. (V L.JI iVi' iUi�l.i iflJ�
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
.IA: Kenneth Rosland, City Pianaver
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: March 1, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
2 Dump Trucks with Standard -Dump Box
Quotations /Bids:
Company
1• Astleford.EquipMent Co., Inc.
�C
Amount of Quote or Bid (each)
$42,679.00
2. North Star International Trucks, Inc. $42,797.00
Lakeland Ford Truck Sales, Inc. $43,594.00
4.. Boyer. Ford Truck Sales, Inc. $43,865.00
Department Recommendation: Astl'eford Equip. Co. $85,358.00
Puhl i c WnrkR - rapes
Sign tt ore Department
Finance Director's Endorserrent:.
The recommended bid is c/ / is not
within the amount budget for the purchase.
J
N. Dalen, Finance Director
Cirr
1a
City Endorsement:
. I c oncur with the reconYnendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
th Rosland, City Manager
i�t�l(U LJI i Ui`. r Ur \l.�Ir1JL
4
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
AA: Kenneth Rosland, City tlanaver
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITE14 IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: March 1, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
1 Dump Truck with Box for Loadall Addition
Quotations /Bids:
Company
1• Lakeland Ford Truck Sales, .Inc.
2. Boyer Ford Trucks, Inc.
Amount of Quote or Bid
$42,164.00
1
$43,364.00_
Department Recommendation: Lakeland Ford $42,164.00
Public Works- Street
Signatur Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is '✓ is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
�W)
en, tinance Director
City Ma aer's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the reconinendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
i\LgULZ)i i'Uj\ i'Ult ,,a%jL
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director of Park and Recreation
AA: Kenneth Rosl and, City Planager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITE14 IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: March 1, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
1/2. Ton Pickup Truck
Quotations /Bids:
Company
Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet
2. Melva Yokiel Motors, Inc.
0
Department Recommendation:
Thane Hawkins Polar Chev. $8,754
Finance Director's Endorsemei,,.
The recommended bid is is not
Amount- of Quote or Bid
$8754.00
$9,229.00
within the amount budget for the purchase.
. n, uaien, rinance Director
City Manager's Endorsement:
�1. I concur with the recommnendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
' V
i Ui% i Ufll.ilflJL
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
rIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Hanauer
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: March 1, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
1/2 Ton Pick -up _ Utility Department
Quotations /Bids:
Company
�• Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet
2' Melva Yokiel Motors, Inc.
Z.
n e� ilvi DiA4
Amount of Quote or Bid
$9,254.00
$9,760.00
Department Reconnaendation:
Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet $9,254.00
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is ✓ is not
_Publ i c Works - []ti l j�}y
atur Department
within the amount budget for the purchase.
. ri. ualen, H nance Director
City Ma oer's Endorsement: V
1. I concur with the reconrnendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
1IA: Kenneth P.osland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITF14 IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: March 1, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
2 -.1/2 Ton Pick -.ups, Standard Six Engine
Quotations /Bids:
Company
L Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet
2. Melva Yokiel Motors
Z.
. - - NGFul W111--II b 1.G1.U1;JI1G11UQ 1. 1 U11 . Thane' Hawkins Polar Chevrolet
'Amount of Quote or Bid (each)
$8,204.00
•$8,936.00
$16,408.00
Jam— �� ✓ Public Works/ 0nPPr11
t
Sign e Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bi.d is ✓ is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
P1. ualen, hinance Director
I/ V I
City F aaer's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recon-irendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
Kenneth lZosland, City Manager
MEMORANDUM
TO: COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: C. WAYNE COURTNEY, MAYOR
SUBJECT: BOARD /COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS - COUNCIL LIASION
DATE: MARCH 1, 1985
I would like to recommend that the following persons be appointed as indicated
below. These are new appointments and complete the rosters.
Board of Appeals and Adjustments
Mary Schroch For term to 2 -1 -88 (Submitted by Chuck Bredesen)
4500 Drexel Avenue
Human Relations Commission
Winton Boyd For term to 2 -1 -88 (Submitted by School Board)
212 W. 65th Street (23) (Moving to Edina 5- 1 -85.- on staff Christ Presbyterian)
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
David Gepner For term to 2 -1 -87 (Submitted by Mayor Courtney)
4817 Dunberry Lane
Please also be prepared to indicate the Board /Commission with which you wish
to act as liasion.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members
FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: CORPORATE REPORT
DATE: March 1, 1985
Attached please find a copy of the 1984 Corporate Report.
KR /sw
Attachment
s
CITY OF EDINA
CORPORATE REPORT
EDINA, 1984
JANUARY, 1985
The upswing that occurred economically during the latter part
of 1983 continued during the first half of 1984 and into the
second half of 1984. In addition to an overall strong economy,
the inflation rate remained at a very low rate, with interest
rates reaching 10.5 %, the lowest prime rate since 1978. The
chief economic concerns during 1984 consisted of the ever
increasing federal debt, together with the fact that the world
economy was not growing in the way that the U. S. economy had
been going. The latter has caused concern in that it was felt
that the U. S. economy cannot continue to drive the rest of the
world.
1984 also w-as a generally prosperous year in the State of
Minnesota, with the State's biennial budget realizing a
substantial surplus during the biennium. This upswing in the
economy occurred at a time when there is growing sentiment to
alter the Minnesota public tax and financing system, with a
strong drive to improve Minnesota's business climate. This
general economic prosperity, however, has overshadowed the
generally difficult economic straits that are being experienced
in portions of the Minnesota economy.
Minnesota has four major sectors to the its economy, both in
terms of business and geography:
- Agriculture - Principally found in the southern third and
western portion of the State. This sector has, because of
high land and equipment prices coupled with low commodity
prices and sales, been a significant problem since at least
1980.
- Mining - Located principally on the Iron Range, this sector
of the economy has experienced a substantial decrease in
employment with widespread layoffs since the mid -70's,
because of a downturn not only in the overall demand for
raw steel but also the increased competition from imported
steel.
- Tourism - Generally found in the areas north of the Twin
Cities and north of I -94, this sector of the economy has
been struggling for a number of years to establish itself,
and substantial state -wide efforts have been made in the
last two or three years to attract people to the area.
- Metropolitan area - Defined by the seven - county areas with
spillover into the adjacent counties, this sector
represents approximately half the population, and its
prosperity the last couple of years has been driven by the
high tech industries corporately located here, such as
Honeywell, Control Data, 3M, etc., plus the prosperity of
other corporate headquarters, such as Pillsbury, General
Mills, IDS, etc. Additionally, the Metropolitan area has
-z-
experienced a significant construction boom during the last
two or three years, which has aided that industry in this
area. While this area was at one time primarily dependent
on specifically the agricultural business, it is less so
today, although a significant portion of the economy is
still dependent on the prosperity of the five -state region
that it serves.
While these sectors are not equal in size, economy or numbers
of people involved, a significant downturn in two (if not three)
of these economies will eventually be reflected in the
Metropolitan area. This is true not only to the extent that the
sectors are economically interdependent but also and perhaps more
importantly the State - funded services such as education and
welfare will by necessity be bourn by the Metropolitan area, as
the other sectors may not be able to generate the needed tax
revenues themselves. In addition to this, State monies will be
used for programs to assist these depressed economic areas,
through unemployment costs and /or eonomic develoment costs.
For Edina, specifically, 1984 saw the actual work on the
development of the objectives set forth in the 1983 strategic
planning process. In addition, reflecting a more business -like
approach to the organization through the strategic planning,
there has been more of a consideration of at least some of the
aspects that the City undertakes in consideration of the customer
and the business strategy of various services provided.
Principal among the considerations during 1984 were traffic flows
and street construction; park and park development; and provision
of paramedic services by the City.
SIGNIFICANT EVENTS
-Perhaps the most significant event reflecting the ongoing
change of the face of the U. S. economy and society was the 1984
election. Of the 39,113 voters that were registered to vote in
the general election, a total of 30,331 were cast, resulting in a
77.4% voter turnout for Edina. Just under 107 of these were
absentee ballots, with 3,240 people registering at the polls on
election day.
- Local - Council Member Schmidt indicated during the summer
of 1984 that she would no longer be running for office.
Mayor Courtney was re- elected unopposed. Additionally, of
the two Council Member slots that were up for election,
Leslie Turner was re- elected, and Peggy Kelly was elected
for the first time to Council Member Schmidt's spot.
Additionally, on the ballot was an advisory referendum to
permit wine -only licensing in restaurants. Of the 85% of
the voters who expressed an opinion on this option, 76 %.of
those were in favor of such licensing.
- State - The most significant event on the State level was
the unexpected take -over of the Minnesota House by an
Independent Republican majority, the first time since 1972.
While the Senate is still controlled by the Democratic
Farmer /Labor Party, the thrust of the Electorate, on both
the State and national level, has been to reduce taxes, and
-3-
it is expected that the principal outcome of the 1985
Legislature will be a tax reduction promoted by both
parties, with the only difference being the percentage and
who takes credit for it.
- Federal - The Presidential race resulted in an overwhelming
victory for President Reagan and the Republican Party, with
Senator Rudy Boschwitz being elected by an overwhelming
majority from Minnesota.
Local - Other significant local events in 1984 included:
- Successful results from the initial joint lobbying effort
of the Municipal Legislative Commission during the 1984
legislative session, which resulted in maintenance of Edina
state aids for 1985.
- Further development of the 1983 strategic planning process
objectives, including:
- Ongoing meetings with the City's legislators
- Adoption of a capital budget
- Development of an official positions process for lobbying
at the Legislature
- Adoption of the revised zoning ordinance
- Review of various alternative revenues
- Discussion of various service levels in selected areas
County - Significant on the County level was the election of John
Keefe, replacing Dick Kremer as the County Commissioner
representing Edina on the County Board. A primary policy
concern was development of the solid waste management program
for the County.
Metro = 1984. was a transition year for several of the
metropolitan agencies, with Sandra Gardebring being appointed
as the head of the Metropolitan Council, together with Dottie
Rietow being named to be the Metropolitan Council member from
the Edina /St. Louis Park /Golden Valley /Robbinsdale areas.
Other significant changes included splitting the Metropolitan
Transit Commission into a regional transit board and
Metropolitan Transit Commission being an operating agency for
the buses; appointment of Peter Meintsma, Mayor of Crystal,
as head of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission; and Ray
Glumack becoming the Chairman of the Metropolitan Airports
Commission, vacating a slot as Executive Director of the
Commission.
State - In addition to the budget surpluses that were brought on
by the generally healthy economy and the increased taxes from
1982 -1983, significant events included:
- Conclusion of study and release of a report by the
Latimer commission on the tax environment, together with
recommendations to substantially revamp Minnesota's tax
structure
- Maintenance of the status quo for local government state
aids, together with development of a new state aid
formula by the League of Minnesota Cities
-4-
- Significant question was raised regarding the operation
and governing of the municipal employees pension fund
(PERA)
- Legislation passed, making Minnesota one of the first*to
mandate the Comparable Worth Study on a municipal level
ECONOMIC PROFILE
The economic growth for 1984 was at about 6.97, although some
slowdown occurred in the latter half of the year. There is
expected to be a decline in the economic growth, both nationally
and state -wide, particularly in the second half of 1985. The
consumer price index was 3.67 for 1983 and 3.47 for 1984, but it
is expected to go up slightly to 57 for 1985. Interest rates,
which have dropped to 10.57 for the beginning of 1985 should
remain in that range up until the summer at which point it is
expected they will creep up as much as a percent and one -half
during the second half of the year. It is expected that
Minnesota's economy will not be as strong as it has been in 1983-
84 and that with continued trouble, most notably in the
agricultural sector and the mining sector, that there will again
be potential significant shortfalls on the state level for the
next biennial period.
POLITICAL PROFILE
The efforts undertaken by the City Council in 1983 -84
regarding their lobbying with the Legislature are expected to see
greater results during the 1985 session, as the state -wide and
national trends have been in concert with the direction that
Edina has been going. Specifically, during the 1985 legislative
session, principal issues are expected to include:
- Significant income tax reduction
- Revised state aids formula
- Revision of emergency jobs program
- Revision of school aid funding and opportunities
- Significant alteration in the State's welfare program
ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT
General Management - In addition to the work done to further
develop the objectives set forth by the Council's strategic
plan, a major undertaking and direction was development of an
outline for a business strategy plan for the various
enterprise funds, together with the possibility of using that,
in at least selected service areas under the general fund.
The first specific area developed under this program will be
that for the liquor store operations.
Personnel - Improvement in the economy was reflected in the
turnover rate of personnel at the City of Edina. During
1984, the turnover rate was 77, which is up from the 4.67 of
1983. The salary schedule was increased by 57 for all
persons not covered by bargaining units, and negotiations
with two of the units realized a 57 increase in their wage
package. Additionally, in an arbitrated settlement, a third
union realized a 57 actual increase for 1984, with a 17
increase at the end of the year to make it a total of 67.
The number of full -time personnel remained around 210.
-5-
Finance - The assessed value of the community increased 3.5%
between 1983 and 1984, and for 84- payable 85 it increased
about 4.87, which included a 3% adjustment on residential
values across the board by the County in Edina. The City's
general budget actually increased about 27 over the actual
1983 budget, and the proposed 1985 budget will increase about
6.5 %. The percentage actually funded by the property tax of
the General Fund will remain just over 69%. In addition to
the adoption of a long -range capital budgeting program, the
Council additionally did the following financial items:
- Utilized uncommitted reserves to fund the ongoing operating
deficits and inter - departmental loans of selected
enterprise funds.
- For the 1985 budget, combining the General and Park Fund
into one budget.
- Issued 2.3 million dollars in certificates of indebtedness
to cover -the cash flow until the tax settlements came in
July.
- Issuance of 5.4 million dollars in bonds to convert
temporary improvement bonds to permanent improvement bonds,
at an interest rate of 8.19 %.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
While the number of new buildings has slowed considerably
since the mid -70's, selected developments together with
redevelopments have consumed considerably more time and energy in
consideration than was typical of a new development in the past.
Significant among the 1984 community development considerations
included:
- A moratorium on multiple developments in order to have
adopted the new zoning ordinance to bring any new multiple
development in line with it.
- Consideration and approval of three developments in
northwestern Edina on properties that had not previously
been developed, including the Miller Addition.
- Considerable staff work, together with approval of the
first reading of the Edinborough Project zoning.
- The creation of a tax increment district in the Grandview
area to do improvements in traffic, parking and general
development of the area.
- Entrance of the MetrOval proposal and the competition for
speed skating facility in the metropolitan Twin City area.
This, however, was eventually decided in favor of the
Roseville proposal, with several ideas from Edina's
proposal being incorporated in that.
- Approval of joint work by State, County, Bloomington and
Edina to upgrade the interchange at 494 and France Avenue.
- Consideration of changes which may affect traffic flow and
volume and the street surface on 44th Street, 50th Street
in the Wooddale area, and also on 70th Street.
- The number of building permits were up slightly from 1983,
going from 874 to 891, with the total value, however, of
projects built going from 43.4 million to 31.2 million.
This was principally due to a 5 million dollar decrease in
new value being built. This is in addition to a 1.1
million dollar increase in value in remodeling. Except for
the economic downturn in 1982, new construction before had
represented over 607 of the value, and remodeling
represented under 407 of the total value. In 1984, it was
about a 50/50 split.
- The staff undertook a study back last spring to work
towards an improved physical development coordination. The
results of their study were approved for implementation in
December and look to have this process provide better
inspections, more integrated and comprehensive plan
development and review, together with better documentation
of actions taken.
PUBLIC SAFETY
Calls for service in the police area which had been leveling
off for the past few years experienced a 5% increase in calls,
which went from about 18,345 to 19,274. In addition to this
significant increase, the following were of note:
- The implementation of significant volunteer efforts to
provide community service in the Police Department, kicked
off by grants and work by the Lion's Club. Principal
components of this program are the institution of a Public
Safety Explorer Program, together with a new effort to
upgrade the Edina Reserve Program.
- Modification of the Animal Control Ordinance to provide a
more comprehensive leash law, together with a permanent dog
licensing system with annual renewal.
- Consideration of traffic issues on West 70th Street and
also West 50th Street.
- Successful continuation of crime prevention programs,
including expansion to over 300 clusters of Neighborhood
Home Watch and continuance of the award - winning Edina
Police Report, with a change in directors of that program.
- A fuller utilization of the POSSE computerized information
.system to improve retrieval of information and cut down on
redundancy of information through Logis. This system is
expected to have a further upgrade in 1985, hopefully to
make it more compatible with information to be provided to
the State.
Fire calls for 1984 were up from 657 in 1983 to 690 in.1984;
however, this is still down from the all -time low of 760 calls
back in the late 70's. Medicals, however, did hit a new high at
1518 calls, up 4.4% from the 1454 calls in 1984. Additional
considerations included:
- Consideration of alternatives to the current set -up for
provision of Paramedic services to the City of Edina's
community.
- Increase in the ambulance billing fees to bring them closer
in line with those charged by surrounding services.
- Fire prevention efforts were highlighted by the annual Open
House, which again had a very successful turnout.
An important event for community health safety was conversion
of all food and vending licenses from manual operation to the
City's HP125, which has reduced substantial clerical work,
improved monitoring of vending machines particularly and
simplified the renewal process for the applicant.
-7-
PHYSICAL OPERATIONS
The first half of 1984 was a continuation of one of the most
difficult winters in recent history. In addition to concluding a
winter, it had the highest snowfall for any winter on record, and
significant cold periods made it difficult to provide service.
Despite the weather, however, the Public Works crews and Park
crews were able to maintain service in their usual outstanding
manner.
Other events of significance in this area included:
- The ongoing improvement of equipment in the Public Works
area to cut down the need for maintenance and improve the
speed of operations.
- Introduction of the Vehicle Management System to upgrade
management of Public Works vehicles' repairs and related
work through the Logis system. This introduction
represents the first significant use of computerization in
this area in Edina.
- 1984 saw the expansion of the contract Tree Trimming that
was initiated in 1983. Work was completed in the northeast
quadrant of the City, with work bid in the balance of the
City east of Highway 100, and work commencing in that area.
Of the 10,682 street trees identified in the City -wide
survey done in the fall of 1983, approximately half needed
to be trimmed. It is expected that the work west of 100
will be completed in the next 12 to 15 months. The work
has been done with little complaint from the affected
neighborhoods.
- The Park Department has continued the ongoing rejuvenation
and upgrade of park playground equipment to make it more
safe and usable by those in the area.
Significant work was done to Arneson Acres by re- arranging
the entrance and the placing of a parking lot.
Additionally, gravel removal and grading work has been done
in Van Valkenburg Park, with anticipation for further
development of the park to a softball complex in 1985 and
1986.
- Approval by the Council of a program for upgraded
facilities at Braemar Golf Course, including the $300,000
improvement of the Par 3 Course, addition of a $200,000
maintenance building, together with a $600,000 upgrade to
the present clubhouse. All golf course work is to be done
with bonds and paid off by revenues generated exclusively
by that facility.
- Altered the solid waste handling system for all City
properties, resulting in a net savings of about $10,000.
HUMAN SERVICES
Significant events in those services provided directly to the
residents of the community included:
- Recreational participation remained at levels found in
previous years, principally due to the personal contract
done prior to registration.
- Revitalization of the Edina Gymnastics Association with the
resulting 50% increase in participation in that program,
with arrangements through the Community Center and the City
to allow usage of the temporary building at the Community
Center, together with the Weber Park building when
programming permits. Additionally, this included a $15,000
loan from the City to upgrade and purchase new equipment by
the Association.
- Continuation of the provision of Public Health Services
with the City of Bloomington at reduced expense to the City
of Edina. In part, this reduction in expense while
providing the same categories of service was done as
Bloomington did not have the money to "market" their
services as they had in the past, resulting in a lower
demand.
- 1984 again saw a significant increase in the number of no-
fault discrimination complaints that were handled by those
qualified members of the Human Relations Commission.
- Significant negotiations regarding temporary changes in the
Cable franchise ordinance were undertaken. This is in
addition to significant rates done unilaterally by the
com -pany, together with changes in their billing system in
November, yielding considerable customer dissatisfaction.
ENTERPRISE OPERATIONS
Among the significant events in these funds was the
development of a business strategy outline with a prototype being
done for the liquor stores, together with the forgiveness or
write -down of various operating losses and loans from selected
funds. As part of this "bail -out," the funds will now annually
have those operating deficits made up specifically out of the
General Fund at the discretion of the City Council. While
specific results from each of the funds have not been fully
tabulated, the following represent general trends for each of
them:
- Liquor operation sales were about 3% below the previous
year; however, there was a 14% increase in the profit
picture for this operation.
- Utility fund - This fund has been combined, and during 1984
realized some additional increases in the fees charged by
the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission.
- Golf Course operation again realized a record year, and it
is projected that their revenues will be ample enough to
cover the bonding to be undertaken for the improvements.
- Recycling volumes continued at previous levels, with prices
not varying greatly. Income from the operation is still
covering direct costs of the program. At present, the
Recycling Commission is reviewing the possibility of
neighborhood pick -up and will be making a recommendation to
the Council within the next several months.
- While the other funds -- Arena, Art Center, Pool and Gun
Range - -are expected to show operating deficits, it is
expected that the Arena may well be close to a break -even
situation as it was in 1983.
It is felt that the business strategy plans developed for
each of these areas will help in focusing the services,
operations and finances, to make them operations that are within
the philosophy and intent of the City Council.
SUMMARY
The City's philosophy and approach has been to remain a local
organization funded principally on local revenues. This together
with maintaining the needed independence and the philosophy to be
a proactive rather than reactive organization, has proven
invaluable in the City's ability to weather the tough financial
times in local government during the late 70's and 80's. The
desire to take control of the destiny should put the organization
in good shape for the balance of the 1980's. In taking this
stance, Edina has been an excellent model, and its philosophy is
being taken up by many of those at other levels of government.
It is expected, however, that the 80's and possibly into the
early 90's will continue to be economically unstable times, both
on the national basis and particularly here within the State of
Minnesota, given the fact that significant economic sectors will
remain in trouble for the balance of the decade. To the extent
that the metropolitan area has become an international trader,
the world economy will become of more significance, which has
been even more variable than the recent U. S economy.
FINANCIAL STATISTICS
Budget Comparisons
(The 1982 actuals reflect the reduction in Homestead Credit paid by the State.)
*Projected
Property Tax Base Comparisons
1980
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
Overall Budget
Increase Over Previous
$2.008 Bil
$2.242 Bil
$2.306 Bil
$2.418 Bil
Percentage Change
17.6%
Proposed
11.7%
8.7%
6.2%
8.5%
6.3%
7.3%
6.5%
Actual
$629.0 Mil
6.2%
11.4%
1.2%
9.9%
1.9%
*3.6%
Local CPI
(December- December)
11.0%
14.5%
2.6%
3.6%
3.4%
*5.0%
Percentage
Funded by Property Tax (includes
homestead
credits of
20% total
taxes
raised)
Proposed
59.1%
60.5%
60.8%
64.0%
69.8%
69.7%
Actual
58.9%
57.2%
60.3%
59.3%
67.6%
*69.4%
Percentage
Increase in Taxes Raised
Proposed
12.9%
7.8%
9.1%
11.7%
17.0%
6.5%
Actual
13.3%
8.2%
6.7%
13.8%
16.2%
6.2%
Mill Rate
Actual
9.849
9.214
9.065
9.049
10.37
10.34
% of Tax
Dollar
10.9%
10.9%
10.3%
10.0%
10.9%
11.1%
(The 1982 actuals reflect the reduction in Homestead Credit paid by the State.)
*Projected
Property Tax Base Comparisons
*Prior to deductions for fiscal disparities and tax increment.
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
Estimated Market Value
$1.530 Bil
$1.797 Bil
$2.008 Bil
$2.242 Bil
$2.306 Bil
$2.418 Bil
Percentage Change
17.6%
17.4%
11.7%
11.6%
2.9%
4.8%
Assessed Value*
$431.4 Mil
$498.8 Mil
$558.5 Mil
$629.0 Mil
$651.0 Mil
$682.3 Mil
Percentage Change
4.9%
15.6%
11.9%
12.6%
3.5%
4.8%
*Prior to deductions for fiscal disparities and tax increment.
Percentage of Estimated Market Value (EMV)
Residential
Commercial /Industrial
Apartments
Percentage of Assessed Value
Residential
Commercial /Industrial
Apartments
Approximate Percentage of Taxes
Paid (after homestead)
Residential
Commercial /Industrial
Apartments
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
74.4%
74.9%
74.8%
75.2%
74.7%
74%
19.2%
18.9%
19.4%
19.3%
19.9%
21%
6.4%
6.2%
5.8%
5.5%
5.4%
5%
64.2%
63.5%
63.5%
64.5%
63.9%
63%
28.1%
29.1%
29.9%
29.4%
30.3%
31%
7.7%
7.4%
6.6%
6.1%
5.8%
6%
54.8%
54.4% -
- 54.0%
56%
35.7%
37.0% -
- 38.0%
37%
9.5%
9.0% -
- 8.0%
7%
City of Edina Share of Tax Dollar: 11.1%
Effect i
1981 1982
.67% .70%
1.33 1.39
1.85 1.85
2.10 2.10
ve Tax
1983
. 71'
1.44
1.98
2.25
Rates
1984
.78%
1.51
2.18
2.51
1985
.76%
1.46
2.13
2.46
3.74
3.84
3.96
TAX COMPARISONS
Market Value
3.74
3.84
Total Taxes
4.14
Single Family
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
Residential /Homestead
3.84
3.96
4.14
4.15
$50,000
$ 337
$ 348
$ 355
$ 388
$ 380
100,000
1,332
1,393
1,435
1,513
1,462
200,000
3,693
3,867
3;958
4,360
4,250
400,000
8,416
8,811
..9,003
10,052
9,825
Commercial /Industrial
$100,000
3,723
3,839
3,959
4,144
4,149
200,000
7,473
7,677
7,917
8,288
8,298
400,000
14,946
15,355
15,835
16,576
16,595
1,000,000
37,364
38,386
39,586
41,438
41,488
City of Edina Share of Tax Dollar: 11.1%
Effect i
1981 1982
.67% .70%
1.33 1.39
1.85 1.85
2.10 2.10
ve Tax
1983
. 71'
1.44
1.98
2.25
Rates
1984
.78%
1.51
2.18
2.51
1985
.76%
1.46
2.13
2.46
3.74
3.84
3.96
4.14
4.15
3.74
3.84
3.96
4.14
4.15
3.74
3.84
3.96
4.14
4.15
3.74
3.84
3.96
4.14
4.15
BONDED INDEBTEDNESS
(a) Hospital Revenue Bonds not included
Balance 1/1/84
1984 Principal
1984 Bond
1984 Indebtedness
Issues
Payments
Issues
Balance 12/31/84
General Obligation
Redevelopment (a)
6,300,000
550,000
5,400,000
11,150,000
Revenue:
Golf Course
200,000
50,000
150,000
Recreation Center
130,000
60,000
70,000
Special Assessment
5,100,000
4,500,000
600,000
All Categories
11,730,000
5,160,000
5,400,000
11,970,000
(a) Hospital Revenue Bonds not included
MEMORANDUM
TO: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER
FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CITY CLERK /r,'1 •'D
SUBJECT: RENEWAL OF BEER, CLUB LIQUOR AND SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSES
DATE: MARCH 15, 1985
The following businesses have applied for renewal of licenses for the year
April 1, 1985 to April 1, 1986, which in accordance with Ordinance No. 902
require approval by the City Council before renewal licenses can be issued:
On -Sale Beer Licenses
Braemar Golf Course
Dayton's Boundary Waters Restaurant
Donaldson's Minnesota Room
Ediner Restaurant
Edina American Legion Post #471
Empress Restaurant
Edina Golf Dome
.J.P.'s Restaurant
King's Court
Los Primos Restaurant
Monterey Jacks
The New LeBistro Cafe of Edina
Normandale Golf, Inc.
Original Pancake House
Rigotto's Pizza Restaurant
Szechuan Star Restaurant
T.J.'s Family Restaurant
Gus Young's Inc. - Biltmore Bowl
Gus Young's Inc. - Southdale Bowl
Off -Sale Beer Licenses
Byerlys of Edina
Edina Superette, Inc.
Holiday Station Stores
Jerry's Foods, Edina
Kenny's Markets
Q Petroleum Corporation - 5401 France
Red Owl Country Store
Superamerica Stations, Inc.
Club Liquor and Sundav Liquor Licenses
Edina Country Club
Interlachen Country Club
I would recommend that the Council approve these renewals, subject to clearance
and approval by the Police Department as not all applications for renewal have been
completely processed as of this date.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members
FROM: Leslie Turner
SUBJECT: EDINA EXPO '85
DATE: March 13, 1985
Edina Expo '85 is coming up April 20 and 21 at the Edina Community Center.
The event will be basically the same as in 1983 with some changes in
program.
Ceil Smith has been representing the City on the Planning Committee, and
the City will have a room and exhibits and demonstrations as it did in
1983.
We have been asked to be available in the City's room to talk with
citizens as we did two years ago. While none of us was overwhelmed
with questions /comments from our constituents, I feel it was worthwhile.
On Monday night, I suggest we. discuss our participation in this event
and decide if and when each of us can be there.
LT /sw
S.
_J6T /4 4 8
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: France Avenue /I -494 Interchange Project
The France Avenue /I -494 Interchange project is ready for bid letting on
March 22, 1985. The project.has'received a final approval from the
Transportation Advisory Board'of the Metropolitan Council for the appro-
priate.federal aid urban funding. The federal funding will be 76% of the job.
Previously, during 1984, the City of Edina approved final plans for Hennepin
,County on this project. However,'Minnesota Department of Transportation has
agreed to assume contract administration of the project. This change
necessitates the City to re- approve the plans via the attached resolution.
As to the financial participation, the staff recommends the City participate to-
the extent that our Municipal State .Aid Funds can be utilized. The total
project cost is auoroximatelv 4.5 million dollars. The.request for City
participation on this project is estimated at.$478,095.63. The.State Aid
office has indicated that a resolution must be passed by Council to authorize
this appropration of Municipal State -Aid Funds. The attached funding
resolution has been revised to reflect project number changes received by us
from the state. Please discard the resolution'prepared for the March 4th
Council meeting.
FJH:lm
3/15/85
V- , A
RESOLUTION
APPROPRIATION OF MUNICIPAL.�STATE -AID FUNDS
WHEREAS, it has been deemed advisable and necessary for the City of Edina
to participate in the cost of a construction project located on
C.S.A.H. No. 17 within the limits of said municipality, and
WHEREAS, said construction project has been approved by the Department of
Highways and identified in its records as S.P. No. 2785 -235, 2785 -237,
2785 -238, Federal Project M5024, and Edina S.A.P. 120 - 020 -13, 120 - 020 -14, and
120 - 020 -15.
NOW,.THEREFORE, BE IT. RESOLVED that we do hereby appropriate from our
Municipal State -Aid Street Funds the sum of $500,000.00 to apply toward
the construction of said project and request the Commissioner of Highways
to approve this authorization.
r
State Project 2735 -235 (494 =393)
State Project 2785 -237 (4914 =393)
State Project 2785 -238 (494=393)
Fed. Proj. M 5024 (4)
R E S O L U T I O N
At a meeting of the City Council of the City of Edina, held on
the day of , 1984, the following Resolution was offered by
I ; seconded by ,
, to wit:
WHEREAS the Commissioner of Transportation for the State of Minnesota has
prepared: plans, special provisions, and specifications for the improvement of
Trunk Highway No. 393, renumbered as Trunk Highway No. 494, and CSAH 17 (Franc-e
Avenue) within the corporate limits of the City of Edina, from the So. Corp Limits
to 670 feet north of 77th Street; and seeks the approval the
NOW, THEN, BE IT RESOLVED that said plans and special provisions for the improve -
ment of said Trunk Highway and•County Roadway within said corporate limits of the
.City, be and hereby are approved including the elevations and grades as shown and
consent is hereby given to any and all changes in grade occasioned by said
construction.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City does hereby agree to ban the parking of all
vehicles, on both sides of roadways as constructed per plans, and special pro-
visions-of above project.
Upon the call of the roll, the following council members voted in favor of the
Resolution:
and, the following council members voted against the adoption of the Resolution:
whereupon the mayor and /or the presiding officer declared the-Resolution adopted.
Dated: , 1984.
Attest
STATE OF MINNESOTA ) .<
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
CITY OF EDINA )
Mayor
City Clerk
I do hereby certify that at said meeting (of which due and legal notice was given)
of the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on the day of
1984; at which.a majority of the members of said Council
were present, the foregoing Resolution'was adopted.
Given under my hand and seal this day of , 1984.
City Clerk
State Project 2735 -235 (494 =393)
State Project 2785 -237 (494 =393)
State Project 2785 -238 (494=393)
Fed. Pro j . M 5024 (4 )
R E S O L U T I O N
At a meeting of the City Council of the City of Edina, held on
the 18th day of March
, 1985, the following Resolution was offered by
Member Turner seconded by Member Kelly
-_ to wit:
WHEREAS the Commfssioner of Transportation for the State of Minnesota has
prepared: plans, special provisions, and specifications for the improvement of
Trunk Highway No. 393, renumbered as Trunk Highway No. 494, and CSAH 17 (France
Avenue) within the corporate limits of the City of Edina, from the So. Corp Limits
to 670 feet north of 77th Street; and seeks the approval thereof;
NOW, THEN, BE IT RESOLVED that said plans and special provisions for the improve-
ment of said Trunk Highway and County Roadway within said corporate limits of the
City, be and hereby are approved including the elevations and grades as shown and
consent, is hereby given to any and all changes in grade occasioned by said
construction.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City does hereby agree to ban the parking of all
vehicles, on both sides of roadways as constructed per plans, and special pro-
visions-.of above project.
Upon the call of the roll, the
following
council
members voted in
favor of the
Resolution: Bredesen. Kelly.
Richards
Turner,
Courtney
F and, the following
council members
voted
against
the adoption of
the Resolution:
None
whereupon the mayor
and /or the
presiding
officer
declared the'Resolution adopted.
Dated: March 21.
,
1985.
Mayor
Attest
City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
)
CITY OF EDINA
)
I do hereby certify that at said meeting (of which .due and legal notice was given)
of the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on the 18th day of
March 1985, at which.a majority of the members of said Council
were present, the foregoing Resolution'was adopted.
Given under my hand and seal this 21st day of March , 1985.
City Clerk
RESOLUTION
APPROPRIATION OF MUNICIPAL STATE -AID FUNDS
WHEREAS, it has been deemed advisable and necessary for the City of Edina to
participate in the cost of a construction project located on C.S.A.H. No. 17
within the limits of said municipality, and
WHEREAS, said construction project has been approved by the Department of
Highways and identified in its records as S.P. No. 2785 -235, 2785 -237,
2785 -238, Federal Project M5024, and Edina S.A.P. 120 - 020 -13, 120 - 020 -14 and
120- 020 -15;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that we do hereby appropriate from our
Municipal State -Aid Street Funds the sum of $500,000.00 to apply toward the
construction of said project and request the Commissioner of Highways to
approve this authorization.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 18, 1985 and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 19th day of March, 1985.
City Clerk
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members
FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: ON -SALE WINE
DATE: March 1, 1985
— V-11 / - �q - 1
At your meeting on March 4, you will again consider the issue of on -sale
wine licensing. At your meeting of January 21, you gave concept approval
to a draft of the ordinance, but there were some issues that had not been
given concurrence by the Council, so first reading of an ordinance was not
granted.
The following represent the principal areas or issues of concern expressed
by the Council members at the January 21 meeting: (No changes except for
verbage on manager's licenses have been made to the attached ordinance draft.)
- Zoning - That issue was whether on -sale wine licensing should be
permitted in the PC I district (Rigotto's, T. J.'s, and Convention
Grill) in addition to PC II, III and the mixed -use development (plus
golf course club houses). Additionally, there was some discussion
regarding permitting sale of wine in restaurants where they are not
the principal use, such as office districts.
- Sunset Provision - As noted in Tom Erickson's attached memorandum,
on -sale licensing in .the State is not considered a property right,
and the removal of on -sale wine licensing would not necessarily
entail pertial condemnation of property that required compensation.
- Individual Server's /Manager's License - The following are issues of
consideration:
a) Whether the people who actually serve the wine be required to be
individually licensed
b) Whether there will be a licensed manager or person in charge
generally on the premises
c) Both licensed
d) That there be no licenses of individuals, either serving or in
charge of the premises
- Fees - Estimates for fees that were given the Council were based on our
best guess at this time and may perhaps be changed after we have the
experience with the licensing. The other issue, in addition to the
amount of the fees, is also looking at the possibility of a graduated
schedule. This is not uncommon when it comes to on -sale liquor, as there
March 1, 1985
Mayor Courtney & Council Members
Page Two
is a larger premise to license and monitor, together with the fact
that to the extent the problems are of enforcement and based on the
volume of business -- generally those with substantially more seats
are going to do a much larger volume of business. A suggested
graduated schedule may be as follows:
- Under 50 seats, $550
- 50 to 100 seats, $600
- 100 to 150 seats, $650
- Over 150 seats, $700
- Size of Service - It was the recommendation of the staff that it be
limited to one liter container. One of the persons speaking to the
issue felt that it should be limited to five -ounce serving glasses.
The problem with this approach, however, would be that there would not
be permitted bottle service at the tables and would probably decrease
the range of types of wine economically permitted to be served.
- Live Entertainment - This issue was raised as a possible concern and
should the Council desire to address this, we can provide language to
specifically delineate areas that the Council wants to limit, although
presently do not consider it a problem.
(After a review of the updated 1984 statutes, in addition to allowing under -
aged busboys, dishwashers and musicians to be in the same premises where
intoxicating liquor is served, it also permits waiters and waitresses to
be under age.)
As alluded to previously, there were other changes that we would suggest in
the ordinance that are not directly related to on -sale wine -only licensing.
They are as follows:
a) Elimination of the 250 -foot distance requirements for on -sale beer,
licenses.
b) Elimination of the six - month requirement for on -sale beer licenses,
as it is felt that six months is probably too short a time for a
restaurant to be in business to get an adequate handle on whether
they will be a going concern or not. 'It is suggested as an alternative
that perhaps the idea of a probationary period to test the restaurant
in the service of on -sale beer (and possibly wine) be looked at to see
if a probationary period of some sort in which the person doesn't have
to be given an annual license should they "flunk" the probationary period.
c) Definition of sale regarding liquor service outside licensed
restaurants - This is an issue that has not been previously raised
with the Council, but has on occasion become problematic as to the
interpretation of what sale means. We would like to insert language,
in hopes of clarifying what has been our interpretation regarding sale.
March 1, 1985
Mayor Courtney & Council Members
Page Three
While this does permit businesses at no cost to serve specific people
by invitation only, at which there is no sale of merchandise (most
probably their employees), our intent of this language change would
be to restrict the service free -of- charge in conjunction with the
retail sale or promotion of the property, merchandise and services
which is generally or effectively open to the public. It has been
our interpretation that the businesses are looking to recoup the cost
of the wine through the eventual sale of property and services.
d) Should the fee be set for liquor at greater than one -half the country
club licenses, the staff will propose an increase at budget time in
conjunction with revision of Ordinance 171 fees. (graduated fee may
impact)
As a final issue, we would like to incorporate in the ordinance that:
a) No licenses be issued prior to July 1, 1985, in order to allow
appropriate application and investigation of the initial block
of applicants (anticipate starting to take applications about a
month after second reading, with another two months for investigation
and Council review).
b) That licenses annually be renewed on July 1.
c) That all new licenses, as with renewals, have a 60 -day minimum
processing time.
Attached is a revision for first reading, subject to your consideration of
the issues previously listed, together with other concerns which you may
presently have regarding on -sale wine licensing.
Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me.
KR /sw
Attachment
ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A1
DRAFT ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 902 TO
ALLOW SALES OF WINE ONLY IN
QUALIFYING RESTAURANTS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Definitions. To Section 1 the following
definitions are added and amended as follows:
"Bar" means a counter or similar kind of 'place or structure
at which wine is served but not in conjunction with regular full
menu service.
"City" means the City of.Edina.
"Commissioner" means the State Commissioner of Public
Safety.
"Council" means the Council of the City of Edina.
"Licensed Premises" means the area shown in the application
as the place where wine will be served and consumed.
"Meal" means entrees and sandwiches offered on a restaurant
menu.
"Person" means and includes any individual, partnership,
association, trust, institution, corporation, or municipality,
and includes also the municipal liquor store.
"Restaurant" means an establishment, under control of a
single proprietor or manager, having appropriate facilities for
serving meals and where in consideration of payment therefore,
meals are regularly served at tables to the general public, and
which employs an adequate staff to provide the usual and suitable
service to its guests. This definition amends and supersedes the
definition of "Cafe and Restaurant" in Ordinance No. 902.
"State" means the State of Minnesota.
"Wine" means vinous beverage created by fermentation.
Sec. 2. Sec. 21, No Liquor in Restaurants, is hereby
amended by adding at the beginning thereof the words "Except as
permitted under Part H of this Ordinance."
Sec. 3. Part H is hereby added as follows:
"PART H. ON SALE OF WINE ONLY IN RESTAURANTS"
Sec. 36. License Required.
(a) No person shall, directly or indirectly, upon any
pretense or by any device, sell for on -sale any wine at
or under 14% by volume in conjunction with the sale of
food without first having received a license therefor
pursuant to this Part H.
(b) On -sale wine licenses shall be granted only to
qualifying restaurants, as determined below, holding a
valid food establishment license under Ordinance 731.
Sec. 37. Licensing Procedure.
(a) The provisions of Ordinance No. 141 of the City
including the penalty provisions thereof shall apply to
all licenses issued under this Part H and to the
-2-
holders of such licenses, except that licenses and
renewals thereof shall be granted or denied by the
Council. Additionally, all licenses must be approved
by the Commissioner. Every person licensed, or
applying for a license, under this ordinance, in
addition to other requirements imposed by this
ordinance for the obtaining or renewal of a license,
shall demonstrate proof of financial responsibility
with regard to liability imposed by Minnesota Statutes,
Section 340.95, to the City Clerk, as a condition to
the issuance or renewal of such license, in the manner
and to the extent required by Minnesota Statute,
Section 340.11, Subdivision 21, provided, if any
licensee or applicant claims exemption from the
requirements of said statute, proof of such exemption
shall be established by affidavit given by such
licensee or applicant, such affidavit to be in form and
substance acceptable to the City Clerk.
(b) In addition to the requirements set forth in Paragraph
(a) of this section, the applicant shall, in the
application form, provide all information required by
the State of Minnesota Department of Public Safety and
such other information as deemed necessary by the City
during the application process to determine compliance
with the provisions of this ordinance and applicable
State laws and regulations.
(c) Applications for the renewal of an existing license
shall be made at least 60 days prior to and not earlier
than 150 days prior to the date of expiration of the
license. The renewal application may incorporate by
reference all information contained in the original
application, to the extent such information is then
true, current, and applicable. If, in the judgment of
the City Council, good and sufficient cause for the
applicant's failure to apply for a renewal within the
time provided is shown, the City Council may, if the
other provisions of this ordinance are complied with,
grant the application notwithstanding such failure to
timely apply.
(d) No license shall be transferred to any person or
premises by the person or from the premises to whom and
for which the license was granted, by any means
whatsoever, including, without limitation, devise,
descent, or involuntarily by the operation of law,
without the person and premises to whom and to which
the license is to be transferred having first submitted
an application containing all of the information
required in an original application, and complying with
all requirements for an original license, and receiving
the approval of the Council, and where required, the
Commissioner of Public Safety, provided that an
application for transfer may refer to, and incorporate
therein by reference, the information set forth in the
original application for the license to be transferred,
to the extent such information is then true, current
and applicable.
-3-
(e) Any change in the persons named in the original
application or any change in the original application,
as required by Sec. 37 of this ordinance, including any
change in the managers or persons in charge of the
licensed premises, or any change in the licensed
premises or seating capacity, then, shall be deemed a
transfer for purposes of this ordinance; provided,
however, if the licensee is a limited partnership, a
change in the limited partners of 10% or less
cumulatively over the then license period, shall not be
deemed a transfer; and provided further, however, that
if the licensee is a corporation, a change in stock
ownership of 10% or less, cumulatively over the then
license period, shall not be deemed a transfer.
Sec. 38. Financial Requirements.
(a) Investigation Fees and Deposit - At the time of
original application, the applicant shall deposit $500
with the City of Edina for the Investigation Fee.
Should the investigation require an out -of -state
investigation, an additional $2000 shall be deposited
prior to further processing of the application by the
City. The cost of the investigation shall be based on
the expense involved, but in no event shall it exceed
$500 if the investigation is limited to the State of
Minnesota or $10,000 if outside the State. All deposit
monies not expended on the investigation shall be
either applied to the license fee or refunded to'the
applicant. All investigative expenses incurred in
excess of the deposit shall be paid prior to
consideration of the license application by the
Council. Investigation fees for license renewal shall
not exceed $100 unless there is a change of ownership
of more than 10% cumulatively over the then existing
license period as provided in Section 37.(e) of this
ordinance.
(b) License Fees - The applicable fees are listed in
Ordinance 171. Licenses terminated prior to the end of
the term shall be prorated quarterly with fees being
refunded for any quarter or quarters in which the
license was not used. All fees shall be paid prior to
consideration of license application by the Council.
Should any license application be withdrawn or denied,
the fee shall be refunded except for $75.00. Provided,
however, if denied because of willful misstatement in
the application, no refund shall be made.
(c) Bond and Insurance - The same requirements set forth in
Sec. 11 of this ordinance applies to licenses under
Part H. The insurance requirements set out in Section
37 of this Ordinance must be met prior to issuance of a
license under this Part H.
(d) Other Fees - All fees, assessments and taxes delinquent
at time of license issuance must be paid prior to
issuance of the license as required by Sec. 12 (f) of
this ordinance.
-4-
Sec. 39. Conditions of Licensing. In addition to the
conditions set forth in Sec. 12 (d) and (e) and Sec. 13 (d), the
following conditions apply both as a condition of license
approval and ongoing license retention:
(a) Licensee - The licensee must:
1) Be of good moral character and repute.
2) Be of legal drinking age.
3) Be eligible under Minnesota Statutes Ch. 340, and
the regulations promulgated by the Commissioner.
4) Be an individual owner, a partnership or a
corporation.
5) If an individual, not have (A) been convicted
within the five years prior to the application for
a license, of any violation of any law of the
.United States, the State of Minnesota, or any other
state or territory, or of any local ordinance with
regard to: (i) the manufacture, sale, distribution
or possession for sale or distribution of
intoxicating liquor or other controlled substances;
(ii) gambling; (iii) theft; (iv) vice; or (B) had
an intoxicating liquor license, including a wine -
only on -sale license, revoked for any violation of
any statutes, ordinances or. regulations relating to
the manufacture, sale, distribution or possession
of intoxicating liquor or wine.
6) Have an individual in charge, or manager, of the
licensed premises, who is generally present on the
licensed premises who would be eligible for a
license under this Part H to be issued directly to
him as an individual licensee. This person shall
hold an individual manager's license issued
pursuant to Section 43 hereof, and must sign a
statement indicating he has reviewed and under-
stands the pertinent sections of this Ordinance and
of State laws and regulations.
7) Not have applied for nor hold a federal wholesale
or retail liquor dealer's special stamp or a
federal or state gambling or gaming stamp or
license.
8) Not be an employee or elected official of the City
of Edina.
9) Not have falsified any information given either in
the application or in the process of investigation.
10) On renewal not have been found in violation of any
provision of this ordinance or applicable State
statutes or regulations.
11) If an individual, be a U.S. citizen.
12) Not be financially indebted to a person who is
disqualifed under Subparagraphs 5, 7 and 11 of this
paragraph (a) .
(b) Licensed Premises - The licensed premises must meet the
following requirements:
1) Be in a PC1, PC2 or PC3, or Mixed Development
District or be in a restaurant permitted in the R -1
District, as established by the City Zoning
-5-
Ordinance.
2) Have an exclusive entrance from or exit to the
exterior of the building in which the licensed
premises are located. Entrances or exits from or
to a public concourse or public lobby meet this
requirement.
3) Be under the control of the licensee.
4) Be a restaurant having facilities for seating not
fewer than 25 guests at one time.
5) Have a valid food establishment license and have a
kitchen approved by the City Public Health
Sanitarian.
6) Have appropriate space for storage, preparation or
other handling or service of food which is not be
adversely impacted by the storage and service of
wine.
7) Have a physical barrier between non - licensed
premises and the licensed premises which prevents
the passing of patrons from the licensed premises
to areas outside of the licensed premises, except
for approved and required entrances and exits to
and from the restaurant portion of the licensed
premises. This includes but is not limited to
licensed premises outside a building or in a
public, or quasi - public, mall, concourse, plaza or
similar area.
8) Be in compliance with all applicable codes,
ordinances, statutes and regulations.
Sec. 40. Conditions of Sale. In addition to the conditions
stated in Section 12 (a), (b), (g) and (h); Sec. 19, 22, 23, 24,
25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 31 and 33, the following apply to licenses
issued under this Part H:
(a) No person shall be sold, served, or consume wine who
does not order a meal to be consumed with the wine.
(b) No wine over 14% alcohol by volume may be sold or
consumed.
(c) No sales or consumption of wine shall be permitted at a
bar or beyond the licensed premises.
(d) Wine may not be sold, served or consumed in containers
larger in volume than one liter.
(e) No person working in the licensed premises may be under
the established legal drinking age except busboys,
dishwashers, musicians, waiters and waitresses.
(f) No licensee shall promote the consumption of wine on
the licensed premises by an means or methods which
result in wine prices which are less than those
normally charged on the then regularly -used menu,
including, but not limited to, two - for -one or similar
offers, prizes, coupons, games or barters.
(g) No licensee shall sell, offer for sale, or keep for
sale wine in any original package that has been
refilled or partly refilled. No licensee shall
directly, or through any other person, dilute, or in
any manner tamper with, the contents of any original
package so as to change its composition or alcoholic
content while in the original package. Possession on
the premises by the licensee of any wine in the
original package differing in composition, alcoholic
content or type from the wine received from the
manufacturer or wholesaler from whom it was purchased,
shall be prima facie evidence that the contents of the
original package have been diluted, changed or tampered
with.
(h) Licensees under this Part H may sell wine during the
same hours on Sunday as holders of Sunday sale licenses
may sell intoxicating liquor.
(i) The City inspections authorized by Section 12 (g) of
this ordinance are anticipated to be made at least
twice during each license period.
(j) All applicable provisions of State statutes and
regulations shall be complied with in connection with
the on -sale of wine.
Sec. 41. Suspension and Revocation. The enforcement,
suspension and revocation provisions of Ordinance No. 141 shall
apply to all licenses issued under Part B of this ordinance,
except to the extent inconsistent with applicable State statutes
and regulations, and in the event of such inconsistencies, the
State statutes and regulations shall apply.
Sec. 42. Individual Licensing of Servers.
(a) All personnel who physically serve wine to patrons must
possess an individual server's license issued by the
City. This does not prohibit unlicensed personnel from
taking orders for wine in conjunction with the sale of
food, but wine may only be served by licensed
personnel.
(b) In order to be licensed, servers must meet the
requirements set forth in Sec. 39 (a) (1, 2, 5, 9 and
11), together with signed statement indicating they
have reviewed and understand the pertinent sections of
this ordinance and of State laws and regulations.
(c) The license fee is set forth in Ordinance 171 and shall
not be prorated upon termination.
Sec. 43. Manager's License.
(a) The manager or person in charge shall be an individual,
and shall be designated in the license application.
-7-
(b) The person so designated shall apply for an individual
manager's license on application forms provided by'the
City Clerk. The application shall be processed with
the application of the licensee.
(c) No investigative fees additional to those required by
Section 38 shall be required for a manager's license
application, but if investigation of the proposed
manager results in additional expense, or out of state
investigation, additional deposits may be required to
be made under Section 38.
(d) The person so designated, in order to be granted a
manager's license hereunder, shall and must comply with
all requirements of this ordinance, State statutes and
regulations which are applicable to an applicant for an
on -sale wine license under this Part H, including,
without limitation, Sec. 39 (a) of this Part H.
(e) The license fee is listed in Ordinance No. 171. The
provisions of Section 38 (b) apply to this Sec. 43.
510 NORTH CENTRAL LIFE TOWER
445 MINNESOTA STREET
- ST. PAUL,MINNESOTA 55101
(612) 227 -8017
P. O. BOX 848
340 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55903
(507)288-315e
312 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391
(612) 475 - 0373
DORSEY & WHITNEY
A partnership Including Professional Corporations
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
( 612) 3-40-2600
TELEX: 29 - 0605
TELECOPIER : (612) 340-2868
THOMAS S. ERICKSON, P. A.
(612) 340 -2659
February 5, 1985
Honorable Members of City Council, and
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager
City of Edina
4801 West 50 Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Re: On -Sale Wine Licenses
Gentlemen:
201 DAVIDSON BUILDING
8 THIRD STREET NORTH
GREAT FALLS, MONTANA 59401
(406)727 -3632
SUITE 675 NORTH
1800 M STREET N. W.
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036
(202) 955 -1050
30 RUE LA BOETIE
75008 PARIS, FRANCE
OII 331 562 32 50
At the Council's last hearing on the on -sale wine
ordinance, the question was raised as to whether or not the wine
ordinance should have a "sunset" provision in it. Those advo-
cating the "sunset" provision argue that without such provision
it would be difficult, legally, to terminate all on -sale wine
licenses in the City should the Council hereafter decide that
it no longer desires to have on -sale wine licenses. 'The legal
question presented is whether, without a "sunset" provision,
the City Council could hereafter repeal the on -sale wine license
ordinance, thereby terminating all wine licenses, without lia-
bility to then existing license holders. We briefly researched
the question and have concluded that a license to sell liquor,
or in this case wine, is not a property right in the constitu-
tional sense, and therefore, repeal of the ordinance and
termination of the licenses would not entitle the holders of
such licenses to compensation. There are cases, including
Minnesota cases, that have held that a license for the sale of
liquor, or in this case wine, can add value to a location, and
in connection with condemnation of that location the additional
value resulting from the availablility and use of that license
must be paid for by the condemning authority. However, termina-
tion of a license by itself is not, in our opinion, a
"condemnation" or "taking" of property entitling the license
holder to compensation.
Therefore, it is our conclusion, based upon our brief
research, that the ordinance need not include a "sunset"
DORSEY & WHITNEY
Honorable Members of City Council, and
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager
February 5, 1985
Page Two
provision and that the Council, even without such a provision,
can thereafter decide to repeal the ordinance, thereby termi-
nating all existing on -sale wine licenses without liability to
any then existing wine license holders. Of course, that conclu-
sion is made even more certain by the inclusion in the ordinance
of a "sunset" provision. Such a provision, though not necessary,
is useful because it would give notice to all applicants of the.
possibility of non - continuance and may result in avoidance of
even frivolous lawsuits.
I trust this letter is useful to you in your ongoing
deliberations relative to the on -sale wine ordinance.
Very truly yours,
Triomas S. Erickson
TSE:jd
cc: Mr. Mark Bernhardson
Form DPS9114-5 -75
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
LIQUOR CONTROL DIRECTOR
APPLICATION FOR COUNTY OR CITY ON SALE WINE LICENSE
NOT TO EXCEED 14% OF ALCOHOL BY VOLUME
This application and the bond shall be submitted in duplicate.
Whoever shall knowingly and wilfully falsify the answers to the following questionnaire shall be deemed guilty of perjury and shall
be punished accordingly.
In answering the following questions "APPLICANTS" shall be governed as follows: For a Corporation one officer shall execute
this application for all officers, directors and stockholders. For a partnership one of the "APPLICANTS" shall execute this application
for all members of the partnership.
EVERY QUESTION MUST BE ANSWERED
1. I, 0 as
(Individual owner, officer, or partner)
for and in behalf of , hereby apply for an On Sale
Wine License to be located at
(Post Office Address)
County or City of
State of Minnesota, in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 340, commencing
19 , and ending
2. Give applicants' date of birth
19—
(Day)
(Month)
(Year)
Birthdates of Partners
(Day) (Month) (Year)
or
(Day) (Month) (Year)
Officers of Corporation
(Day) (Month) (Year)
3. The residence for each of the applicants named herein for the past five years is as follows:
4. Is the applicant a citizen of the United States?
If naturalized state date and place of naturalization
If a corporation, or partnership, state citizenship status of all officers or partners.
S. The person who executes this application shall give wife's or husband's full name and address
ff
6. What occupations have applicant and associates in this application followed for the past five years?
7. If a partnership, state name and address of each member of partnership
If a corporation, date of incorporation , state in which incorporated ,
amount of authorized capitalization , amount of paid in capital ,
if a subsidiary of any other corporation, so state
give purpose of corporation
name and address of all officers, directors and stockholders and the number of shares held by each
(Name) (Address- number and street or lot and block) (City)
(Name) (Address - number and street or lot and block) (City)
(Name) (Address - number and street or lot and block) (City)
(Name) (Address - number and street or lot and block) (City)
If incorporated under the laws of another state, is corporation authorized to do business in this State?
. Number of certificate of authority
If this application is for a new Corporation include a certified copy of Articles of Incorporation and By -Laws.
If this application is for a RENEWAL of license state whether any changes have been made in the Articles of Incorporation
and By -Laws since the last issue of License
On what floor is the establishment located, or to be located?
9. Describe the premises to be licensed.
10. Is the establishment located near an academy, college, university, church, grade or high school?
State the approximate distance of the establishment from such school or church
11. State name and address of owner of building
Has owner of building any connection, directly or indirectly, with applicant?
12. Are the taxes on the above property delinquent?
13. State whether applicant, or any of his associates in this application, have ever had an application for a Liquor License rejected
any municipality or State authority; if so, give date and details
a .
)
Py V M�
14. Has the applicant, or any of his associates in this application, during the five years immediately preceding this application ever had
a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revoked for any violation of such laws or local ordinances; if so, give date and details
15. State whether applicant, or any of his associates in this application, during the past five years were ever convicted of any Liquor
Law violations or any crime in this state, or any other state, or under Federal Laws, and if so, give date and details
16. Is applicant, or any of his associates in this application, a member of the county board of the county or council of the city in
which this license is to be issued? If so, in what capacity?
If applicant for license is the spouse of a member of the governing body, or where other family relationship exists, such member shall
not vote on this application.
17. State whether any person other than applicants has any right, title or interest in the furniture, fixtures, or equipment in the
premises for which license is applied, and if so give name and details
18. Have applicants any interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly, in any other liquor establishment in the State of Minnesota?
Give name and address of such establishment
19. Furnish the name and address of at least three business references, including one bank reference
20. What is the seating capacity of this establishment?
21. During what hours will food be available?
22. State name of person who will operate restaurant.
23. State name of person who will operate bar.
24. State number of people restaurant will employ.
25. Will food service be the principal business of this establishment?
26. State trade name to be used.
27. If this restaurant is in conjunction with any other business (such as resort, etc.) describe such business,
28. How many years has this business been in operation under this ownership?
29. State whether applicant has, or will be granted, an "On -sale Non - Intoxicating Malt Beverage" (3.2) and /or a "Set -up" License in
conjunction with this wine license?
30. Does applicant intend to sell wine to other than the consumer?
31. How many months of the year will this establishment be open?
32. Applicant, and his associates in this application, will strictly comply with all the Laws of the State of Minnesota governing the
taxation and the sale of wine, rules and regulations promulgated by the Liquor Control Director; and all laws of the county; and I
hereby certify that I have read the foregoing questions and that the answers to said questions are true of my own knowledge.
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
day of
(Notary Public)
My commission expires
19
(Signature of applicant)
REPORT ON APPLICANT OR APPLICANTS BY SHERIFF'S OFFICE OR POLICE DEPARTMENT
This is to certify that to the best of my knowledge, the applicant, or his associates, named herein have not been convicted within th,
past five years for any violation of Laws of the State of Minnesota, or Municipal Ordinances relating to the sale of non - intoxicating
malt liquor or intoxicating liquors, except as hereinafter stated.
It is my judgement that the applicant will comply with the laws and regulations relating to the conduct of this business should a
license be granted.
Sheriff
County
Chief of Police
Date City
W
I
PLO
c.t.�e cs� -io b a t;c, FF� c� (pct Ti z
4-r, 4k-6jr VLI
C 4r
LU i 4 , Ann Q C;-% t-l't G'Lt 2 .`1 l-r, , A -1 (1 -4 E C
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
BALANCE SHEET
CITY OF EDINA
December 31, 1984
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash:
Demand Deposits
Working Fund
Due from Other Funds
Contracts Receivable
Merchandise Inventory -at lower of cost
(first in, first out method) or market:
Liquor
Wine
Beer
Mix and Miscellaneous
Prepaid Expenses:
Unexpired Insurance
Supplies Inventory
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
FIXED ASSETS ON BASIS OF COST:
Land
Land Improvements $ 22,979.83
Buildings 729,769.27
Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment 306,735.14
Leasehold Improvements 3,035.55
$1,062,519.79
$(40,260.33)
3,800.00 $
$336,491.36
259,035.13
19,622.88
8.100.52
$ 4,098.00
400.00
$233,784.60
(36,460.33)
12,331.50
42,571.76
623,249.89
4,498.00
$ 646,190.82
Less: Allowance for Depreciation and .
Amortization 475,109.84 587,409.95 821,194.55
TOTAL ASSETS $1,467,385.37
LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts Payable
Due to Other .Funds
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS
(Indicates red figure)
$ 179,236.22
468.00
$ 179,704.22
$1,287,681.15
$1,467,385.37
OPERATING EXPENSES
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
December 31 1984 December 31, 1983 INCREASE- DECREASE*
50th
50th
Street
Yorkdale
Grandview
Total
Street
Yorkdale
Grandview
Total
Selling:
Salaries and wages $
81,303.69
$144,066.71
$107,029.27
$332,399.67
$
80,185.51
$151,372.19
$118,388.49
$349,946.19
$
17,546.52*
Supplies
3,372.55
6,246.87
5,368.77
14,988.19
3,273.26
5,058.53
4,437.23
12,769.02
2,219.17,
Licenses and Dues
394.00
144.00
119.00
657.00
380.00
121.00
121.00
622.00
35.00
Service Contracts
950.00
1,810.00
1,380.00
4,140.00
948.40
2,221.20
1,353.60
4,523.20
383.20*
Direct Promotion
937.28
568.28
972.29
2,477.85
1,594.66
1,145.67
1,584.67
4,325.00
1,847.15*
Other
102.00
102.00
204.00
204.00*
$
86,957.
$152,835.86
$114,869.33
$354,662.71
$
86,483.83
$159,918.59
$125,986.99
$372,389.41
$
17,726.70*
Occupancy:
Salaries and wages
3,219.61
1,440.99
902.62
5,563.22
457.53
1,052.31
1,922.00
3,431.84
2,131.38
Telephone
1,804.79
2,183.89
1,546.98
5,535.66
1,507.54
1,833.86
1,204.46
4,545:86
989.80
Supplies
1,251.81
1,704.72
273.83
3,230.36
1,584.67
889.22
1,349.26
3,823.15
592.79*
Light & Power
7,216.88
11,302.98
5,547.48
23,977.34
6,820.70
10,608.70
4,613.53
22,042.93
1,934.41
Maintenance - Heating
and air conditioning
119.55
1,039.61
144.35
1,303.51
354.84
413.60
259.75
1,028.19
275.32
Heat
1,831.73
1,678.51
2,283.44
5,793.68
711.62
2,782.83
2.365.27
5,859.72
66.04*
Laundry and Rug Service
573.90
668.07
796.80
2,038.77
444.78
429.00
803.79
1,677.57
361.20
Burglar alarm
522.52
812.26
587.16
1,921.94
572.26
752.30
553.89
1,878.45
43.49
Insurance
2,952.00
5,504.00
4,752.00
13,208.00
4,147.00
7,811.00
6,548.50.
18,506.50
5,298.50*
Share of maintenance -
parking lot and snow
plowing
711.16
108.00
165.00
984.16
1,913.26
234.50
2,147.76
1,163.60*
Repairs and maintenance
700.62
9,864.40
1,059.32
11,624.34
781.16
8,174.43
467.68
9,423.27
2,201.07
Provision for Deprecia-
tion
15,474.80
10,966.95
19,823.74
46,265.49
15,353.36
13,692.05
19,909.96
48,955.37
2,689.88*
Rubbish Hauling
1,080.00
2,714.72
2,969.62
6,764.34
647.40
2,560.00
2,560.00
5,767.40
996.94
Janitorial Services
83.04
83.85
22.00
188.89
255.35
257.90
179.00
692.25
503.36*
Water and sewer service
325.68
637.20
90.00
1,052.88
325.68
381.14
180.54
887.36
165.52
$
37,868.09
$ 50,710.15
$ 40,874.34
$129,452.58
$
35,877.15
$ 51,872.84
$ 42,917.63
$130,667.62
$
1,215.04*
Administrative:
i
Salaries and wages
27,454.58
31,493.71
29,998.36
88,946.65
23',578.84
27,204.51
23,196.35
73,979.70
14,966.95
Supplies
196.72
211.01
297.62
806.35
408.78
891.53
523.85
1,824.16
1,017.81*
Professional services
1,900.00
1,900.00
1,900.00
5,700.00
1,781.00
2,782.00
3,032.00
8,595.00
2,895.00*
Allocated expenses - rt'mnt.
Ins., office suppl.,etc.
28,740.00
34,980.00
32,700.00
96,420.00
26,040.00
32,160.00
29,460.00
87,660.00
8,760.00
Miscellaneous
113.89
110.00
173.40
297.29
74.01
56.00
130.01
267.28
Mileage
425.00
450.00
425.00
1,300.00
425.00
450.00
425.00
1,300.00
-0-
Checks written off
156.46
790.13
214.00
.1,160.59
127.78
437.26
225.96
791.00
369.59
Data processing system
3,258.93
3,258.99
3,258.94
9,776.86
3,623.37
3,302.82
3,423.09
10,349.28
572.42*
$
62,245.58
$ 73,294.84
$ 68,967.32
$204,507.74
$
57,058.78
$ 67,284.12
$ 60,286.25
$184,629.15
$
19,878.59
$187,071.19
$276,840.85
$224,710.99
$688,623.03
$179,419.76
$279,075.55
$229,190.87
$687,686.18.
$
936.85
Sales:
Liquor
Wine
Beer
Mixed Miscellaneous
Less: Refunds and
Discounts
NET SALES
Cost of Sales:
Inventory,January 1
Purchases
Inventory- December 31
GROSS MARGIN
Operating Expenses:
Selling
Occupancy
Administration
Total Operating Exp.
Operating Income
Other Income:
Discounts
Cash over or (under)
Other
Income on investments
NET INCOME
Depreciation and Amor_
tization included in
expenses
28,222.09 70,318.78 66,949.80 165,490.67 '187,098.03
1,103,861.29 $2,192,514.59 $1,963,182.88 $5,259,558.76 $5,489,052.85
21,607.36*
229,494,09* 100.00% 100.00%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
175,604.42
905,312.59
289,642.25
1,740,439.31
LIQUOR DISPENSARY
FUND
769,373.15
4,500,807.90
66,176.46*
299,895.89*
$1,080,917.01-
188,588.68
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF INCOME AND EXPENSE
$1,793,110.13
203,254.82
$4,904,108.70
623,249.84
$5,270,181.05
703,196.69
$ 366,072.35*
79,946.80*
CITY OF EDINA
$1,798,675.17
PERCENT TO NET SALES
$4,280,858.81
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
1984
$ 393,839.42
1 9 8 4
$ 978,699.95
$ 922,068.49
$ 56,631.46 19.16% 17.96% 19.02% 18.61% 16.80%
1,215.04*
1983
Increase 50th Grand- 1983
50th Street
Yorkdale
Grandview
Total
Total
Decrease* Street Yorkdale view Total Total
$ 526,285.16
$1,088,116.38
$1,000,124.71
$2,614,526.25
$2,808,247.16 $
193,720.91*
341,124.86
651,801.73
561,679.20
1,554,605.79
1,598,768.97
44,163.18*
248,041.82
484,163.25
432,991.34
1,165,196.41
1,167,932.70
2,736.29*
16,631.54
38,752.01
35,337.43
90,720.98
101,202.05
10,481.07*
$1,132,083.38
$2,262,833.37
$2,030,132.68
$5,425,049.43
$5,676,150.88 $
251,101.45*
28,222.09 70,318.78 66,949.80 165,490.67 '187,098.03
1,103,861.29 $2,192,514.59 $1,963,182.88 $5,259,558.76 $5,489,052.85
21,607.36*
229,494,09* 100.00% 100.00%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
175,604.42
905,312.59
289,642.25
1,740,439.31
237,950.02
1,555,160.11
703,196.69
4,200,912.01
769,373.15
4,500,807.90
66,176.46*
299,895.89*
$1,080,917.01-
188,588.68
$2,030,081.56
231,406.39
$1,793,110.13
203,254.82
$4,904,108.70
623,249.84
$5,270,181.05
703,196.69
$ 366,072.35*
79,946.80*
$ 892,328.33
$1,798,675.17
$1,589,855.31
$4,280,858.81
$4,566,984.36
$ 286,125.55* 80.84% 82.04% 80.98% 81.39% SI -20%
$ 211,532.96
$ 393,839.42
$ 373,327.57
$ 978,699.95
$ 922,068.49
$ 56,631.46 19.16% 17.96% 19.02% 18.61% 16.80%
.86,957.52
2,785.07
152,835.86
114,869.33
$
354,662.71
$
372,389.41
$
17,726.70*
7.88
6.97
5.85
6.74
6.79
37,868.09
$
50,710.15
40,874.34
129,452.58
130,667.62
1,215.04*
3.43
2.31
2.08
2.46
2.38
62,245.58
73,294.84
68,967.32
204,507.74
184,629.15
19,878.59
5.60
3.38
3.49
3.89
3.36
$ 187,071.19
$
276,840.85
$ 224,710.99
$
688,623.03
$
687,686.18
$
936.85
16.91%
12.66%
11.42%
13.09%
12.53%
$ 13,361.77
$
116,998.57
$ 148,616.58
$
290,076.92
$
234,382.31
$
55,694.61
2.25%
5.30%
7.60%
5.52%
4.27%
13,476.01
24,726.77
21,610.93
59,813.71
73,134.93
13,321.22*
1.22
1.13
1.10
1.14
1.33
4,96
(272.91)
41.17
(226.78)
(564.50)
337.72
-0-
(.02)
-0-
(.01)
(.01)
1,172.31
1,395.41
868.94
3,436.66
2,103.60
1,333.06
.10
.06
.04
.06
.04
$ 14,653.28
$
25,849.27
$ 22,521.04
$'
63,023.59
$
74,674.03
$
11,650.44*
$ 39,115.05
$
421$47.84
$ 171,137.62
$
353,100.51
$
309,056.34
$
44,044.17
3.57%
6.47%
8.74%
6.71%
5.63%
$
2,785.07
$
3,131.33
$
346.26*
$
355,885.58
$
312,187.67
$
43,697.91
$ 15,474.80 $ 10,966.95 $ 19,823.74,$
46,265.49
$
48,955.37
$
2,689.88*
I�
is
10
1n
n
r
I
"I
SJ
„
1985 CITY OF =DING
ruPry 11!1_ nn TC
A u /111 Al T
CHECK REGISTER
03 -18 -85 PAGE 1
f Tr
f
077704
03/11/85
259.J6
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 440 -44
]
_'7T7n04-
13111 fIII
9.79
AM_'Rl_C-AN L INFN
LAUIMY
1Q_4,2- 6.2- 4_&2 -48
iA
077004
;3%11/85
167.18
AM_RICA'N LINEN
LAUNDRY
10- 4262- 520 -52
a
977 2U4
13/11/85
11.41
AMERICAN LINF_N
LAUNDRY
10- 4262- 628.62
,
077C 4
_ 03/11/85
61.4_1
AMaRIgAN LINEN
LAU(DRY
50- 4262 1 -82
a
C7TOD4
03%11/8 5
54.58
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
50- 4262- 841 -84
0710U4
;13/11/85
67.10
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
50- 4262- 861 -86
-
- - - -- --
629.53 •
'I
,77005
^3/15/85
34 .:D
AUDIO GROJr�
ADVERTISING
50 -4214- 822 -82
0771115
^3/13/85
34.;0
AUDI) GROJP
ADVERTISING
50- 4214 -6 - 8 6
P
-
68. "0 •
I
rrrrrr
a
z
U7T ^n7
13/0.7785
22. ?0
APEX PEST CONTROL
GEN SUPPLIES
28 -4504- 708 -70
21
23
22.30 •
077708
33/C7/85
31.92
KAMAV BEAIING 8 SPLY
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
a
G77e003/13185
4507
KAMy BEARING ��_P�Y REPAIR PARTS
105_4- Q•S1i11 -56
77CC8
J3/ +77185
130.42
KAMAN BEARING B SPLY
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
_-.,�
620.41 •
I�`
077009
03/03185
14.96
ASTLEFORO EQUIP CO
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
077009
G3/08-?85
28.30
ASTLEFORO EQUIP CO
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
07700!9
03/0!13 °
-.15
A5IL;L2B.0 _QUIP CO
REPAIR PARTS
10_-_45_40- 56.0 -56
077009
u3/68/85
8.50
ASTLEFORD EQUIP CO
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
54.91 r
'
*•rrrr
•r• -CKS
,
077013.___.__-
_]3(73/85
2^.88
ALTERNATOi RERUILO
TOOLS
10- 4580- Ani -A0
,.
20.98 •
- --
aa�
•7
n77024
!;3/13/85
57.25
ARTISTAT INC
ADVERTISING
23 -4214- 610 -61
n.l
s°
57.25 •
*..rr•
••r -CKS
,J
r,
077026-
3/07/85
135.35
BADGER METER INC
PATER METERS
40 +1220 - 000.00
"
077026
:33/07/85
43.06
BADGER METER INC
REPAIR PARATS
40- 4540 - 807 -80
,o
ao
...•.•
••• -CKS
aJ
ea
077028
03/13/85
19402.70
BEER WHOL_SALERS
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 822 -82
077028
03/13/85
3082.50
BEER WHOL:SALERS
INVENTORY
50- 4630 - 842.84
67
_.07Tg23-__
03113/85
2.67 .7,159
B'ER WHOLESALERS
INV NTORY
50 46 ;0- 862 -86
61,
79252.70 •
-
.,a
70
It
•ttrr
r••-
71
72
077033
C'3/13/85
222.75
BERG--0R0 TRUCKING
INVENTORY
50- 4626- 822 -82
f
1985 CITY OF EDINA
f.
_
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT
C71U33
I
�I ^77031
077033
a 077033
_777033
I�
• 777034
I
• I 077L'37
•' I ^77U38
CHECK REGISTER 03 -18 -85 PAGE 2
i
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MFSSAGF
^- C3/G7/85� _
_ 101.25 B
BERG =DRD TRUCKING I
INVENTORY 5
50- 4626 - 822 -82 -
-` ,
- U3/77/85 1
101.25 B
BERGFORD-TRUCKING I
INYENLOgY 5
50�4626�4� -84 4
4
03/13/85 3
371.25 B
BERG =ORD TRUCKING I
INVENTORY 5
50- 4626- 842 -84
U3/G7/85 1
143.10 B
B= RGF)RO TRUCKING I
INVENTORY 5
50- 4626- 862 -86 ,
,
.77041 3/07/85
sl
•
i
•I.
i
1,
1 0,0,.;U HUKT & GAIL5UN INC 6EN SUPPLIES 4U -45U4- SUS -8U
1 080.'A *
* tf -CKS
077053 03/11/85 116.93 BROWVING_ =.�=RR SS REFUSE C9LLECLIOCI 10- 425.0-301 -30
077053 03/11/85 53.25 BROWNIN3 =--RRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 10- 4250 - 446 -44 "
^77053 03/11/85 81.84 BROWNING F =RRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 10 -4250- 520 -52
I-
^77U53 U3_/11/85 116.93 9ROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECT ON 10- 4250 - 540 -54
077055 03/11/85 66.45 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 10 -4250- 628 -62
"77053 03/11185 4.19 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 10 -4250- 646 -64
017 05 3 _ 03/11/85 _14_.39 BROWVING FERRIS REFUSE COLLE.^�T -ION 23- 4250 - 610 -61
^77053 C ?/11/85 26.39 RROYNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLFCTION 27- 4250- 661 -66
077053 ,3 /11 /85 153.15 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 28- 4250 - 708 -70
C.77U53 (3_/11/85 324.44 BROWNI43 F_RRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 50- 4250- 841 -84 4F
777U53 L3/11/85 446.58 BROW4143 FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 50- 4250 - 861 -86 4"
1 9404.94
C77r54 (13/08/85 70.60 BATTERS WAREHOUSE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56
70.60 • ]<
]e
* *f -CKS ]i
4i ]o
07705.6_ - u3/13185 141 *130 B H K B_R INC INSURANCE 10- 4260- 510 -51
141.70 • - �,
e�
t. * ... 14
•t* -CKS e e4
"I c]
077058 03/13/85 100110 WAYNE BENNETT POLICE SERV 10- 4100 - 420 -42 (55
100.10
7^
CKS 71
72
077065 03/13/85 138.10 CULLI GXN GEN SUPPLIES 50 -4504- 821 -82 71
74
7]
- -1985 Ca JF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT
CHECK RL -_,TER 03 -18 -85 'AGE 3 C
V __ NDO? TTFM OFSCRTPTTnN errnuNT un_ Tuu_ • 0_n_ ■ MCC Aer f
1'I
_ z
077073
^77_'_!73
017075
" --
077C75 —
�,77075
`�
I;
~, I
42.50 C
CITY 3 =ER I
077078 - -
50- 4630 - 842 -84 ;
677078
�I-
^7707&
CHECK RL -_,TER 03 -18 -85 'AGE 3 C
V __ NDO? TTFM OFSCRTPTTnN errnuNT un_ Tuu_ • 0_n_ ■ MCC Aer f
— - -- - - - - - -- - - - •* *..CKS - - - - -2
31C7 /85 2.19 CLANCY DRJG INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 260 -26
03/ ^7!85 3.63 CLA.VCY DRJG INC GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504- _20-42
"3%07/85 31.19 CLANCY DRUG INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 e
37.31
1•
20
• *•-CKS 21
:,
245..70 �QC9_C_D_LANQLTLIN.G INVENTDRY 50_46.3.2:822 -82 _
C3/13 /885 757.10 COCA COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50- 4632- 842 -84
0;3/13/85 479.55 COCA COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50- 4632- 862 -86 z,
1 z4 82 _..3 5 *
+•• ^CKS
• j:]770P7— x3/!7/85 516.26 CURTIV MATH SCI GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 482 -48 ,
^77087 J3/C7/85 121.34 CJRTIV MAIN SCI GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 •
C-771:8 7 _ _03/Q7/�S_ 69,'07 _CU3TIY_f787 zCI G.EN SUPP-LlES
"770'87 '"3/77/8`. -� - - 224.52- CURTIN MATH SCI CREDIT 10- 4504 - 482 -48 -- — -- -
• 4177037 G G3/u7185 69.07 CURTIN MATH SCI GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 482 -48 „�•
L'i 551.22 *
777097 - -L3/ ^7/85 - - --
I
X77099 .3/ -i_8_- _ - _72.21 Cl�Sli_3Y MOT aR -CO RFPAIg PARTS ,_2L -4 40-6b2
i ,_ -- %85 w
777099 J3/ ^7/85 69476.15 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO PARK -0 P
27.78 COURTNEY : WAYNE MILEAGE
27.78 +
10- 4208- 100 -10
�.1
* ** -CKS ia2
_ •n
• I c UI 27- 4932 - 662 -66
I` 69495.36
�..' *** -CKS
I I
077106,.__.__3_/1/�5 pAHL 10-410(1-420-42
rKlq
s
' 100.00
* * *-
°i 077117 03/08185 84.2D DAVIDS7N DIST INC INVENTORY 50 -4630- 822 -82
_'07711 -- ______J3L 8/ -85, _ 433. A0 OAYL2SQN DIST INC INVENTORY 50- 4- 6.3.Qml4.2_-_E4 _
07711 Q3/08189 32.70 DAVIDSEN 3IST INC INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822 -82 -
•I, -I 550.70 •
•
•
•
•',.. * ** -CKS 1;S
__077114.--- ,_ _61476 _-D 11—GARD T0OL CO GFN- gI�PPLTES -__ - 10- 65f1G -{D1 -fin h.•
_ z
z
23/11/85 4
42.50 C
CITY 3 =ER I
INVENTORY 5
50- 4630 - 842 -84 ;
;
C)3/11/85 9
98.23 C
CITY BEIER I
INVENTORY 5
50- 4630- 862 -86 e
e
140.73 + 9
9
10
:f
+•• ^CKS
• j:]770P7— x3/!7/85 516.26 CURTIV MATH SCI GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 482 -48 ,
^77087 J3/C7/85 121.34 CJRTIV MAIN SCI GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 •
C-771:8 7 _ _03/Q7/�S_ 69,'07 _CU3TIY_f787 zCI G.EN SUPP-LlES
"770'87 '"3/77/8`. -� - - 224.52- CURTIN MATH SCI CREDIT 10- 4504 - 482 -48 -- — -- -
• 4177037 G G3/u7185 69.07 CURTIN MATH SCI GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 482 -48 „�•
L'i 551.22 *
777097 - -L3/ ^7/85 - - --
I
X77099 .3/ -i_8_- _ - _72.21 Cl�Sli_3Y MOT aR -CO RFPAIg PARTS ,_2L -4 40-6b2
i ,_ -- %85 w
777099 J3/ ^7/85 69476.15 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO PARK -0 P
27.78 COURTNEY : WAYNE MILEAGE
27.78 +
10- 4208- 100 -10
�.1
* ** -CKS ia2
_ •n
• I c UI 27- 4932 - 662 -66
I` 69495.36
�..' *** -CKS
I I
077106,.__.__3_/1/�5 pAHL 10-410(1-420-42
rKlq
s
' 100.00
* * *-
°i 077117 03/08185 84.2D DAVIDS7N DIST INC INVENTORY 50 -4630- 822 -82
_'07711 -- ______J3L 8/ -85, _ 433. A0 OAYL2SQN DIST INC INVENTORY 50- 4- 6.3.Qml4.2_-_E4 _
07711 Q3/08189 32.70 DAVIDSEN 3IST INC INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822 -82 -
•I, -I 550.70 •
•
•
•
•',.. * ** -CKS 1;S
__077114.--- ,_ _61476 _-D 11—GARD T0OL CO GFN- gI�PPLTES -__ - 10- 65f1G -{D1 -fin h.•
777097 - -L3/ ^7/85 - - --
I
X77099 .3/ -i_8_- _ - _72.21 Cl�Sli_3Y MOT aR -CO RFPAIg PARTS ,_2L -4 40-6b2
i ,_ -- %85 w
777099 J3/ ^7/85 69476.15 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO PARK -0 P
27.78 COURTNEY : WAYNE MILEAGE
27.78 +
10- 4208- 100 -10
�.1
* ** -CKS ia2
_ •n
• I c UI 27- 4932 - 662 -66
I` 69495.36
�..' *** -CKS
I I
077106,.__.__3_/1/�5 pAHL 10-410(1-420-42
rKlq
s
' 100.00
* * *-
°i 077117 03/08185 84.2D DAVIDS7N DIST INC INVENTORY 50 -4630- 822 -82
_'07711 -- ______J3L 8/ -85, _ 433. A0 OAYL2SQN DIST INC INVENTORY 50- 4- 6.3.Qml4.2_-_E4 _
07711 Q3/08189 32.70 DAVIDSEN 3IST INC INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822 -82 -
•I, -I 550.70 •
•
•
•
•',.. * ** -CKS 1;S
__077114.--- ,_ _61476 _-D 11—GARD T0OL CO GFN- gI�PPLTES -__ - 10- 65f1G -{D1 -fin h.•
•
•
•
•',.. * ** -CKS 1;S
__077114.--- ,_ _61476 _-D 11—GARD T0OL CO GFN- gI�PPLTES -__ - 10- 65f1G -{D1 -fin h.•
1985 CITY OF ED!NA CHECK REGISTER 03 -18 -85 PAGE 4
r
CHECK
NO._ DATE _
AMOUNT
VENDOI
CDNT REPAIRS
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO* INV. # P.O. a Mrs
077114
173/07/85
32.70
DELEGARO
TOOL
CO
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 301 -30
077114
___ =.3/13/85 _ i
_ 42.14
DELEGARD
TOOL
CO
TOOLS
10- 4580 -- 301 -30
U77114
03/C7/85
57.40
OELEGARD
TOOL
CO
TOOLS
10- 4580- 560 -56
^.77114
113/07/85
19.40
DELEGARD
TOOL
CO
TOOLS
10- 4580 - 560 -56
SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
213.40
-�
077148
13/07/95
91.40
ELVIN SAF_TY
SUPPLY
REPAIRS
10- 4540- 449 -44
077120
3/'16 f85
247.C5 +
DORSEY 4
4HITNEY
PRO SERV LEGAL
10- 2010 - 000 -00
49377.50
•ff f.f
49777.50 *
I
n71125 33/_11 /85
077125_ —. D3/1.1195
;j77128 u3/L7/85
�I
i i f i f f
I, 077131 03/13/85
� • i i f f # # #
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
_98.90 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 10_4"z- 54Q_54 _
414.J0 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 40 -4504- 801 -80
512.00 * —
+ ** —CKS
-- 51.30 __ CQ�I_�ESSIONS _ 28- 4624- 704 -70
51.30 • - - - - --
153.57 ASPLJND C)=FEE CONCESSIONS 28- 4624- 704 -710
153.50 *
1
••• -CKS
'I
.
] 1
e
,I e
0
IJ
II
I�
,3
I�
I]
1e
I6
1B
13 IIII
i __SJJII
777134
03/07/85
36.75
CTTYWIDE SERVICES
CDNT REPAIRS
50 -4248- 841 -84
+
` - - -- - -- - -
--- - - -- -
--36.75
ffrfri
* ** —CKS
— 677148
U3/C7185
120.0
ELVIN S4F_TY
SUPPLY
CDNT REPAIRS
10- 4248- 449 -44
l.q
977148
35.65
ELVIN SAFETY
SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4544- 440 -44
-�
077148
13/07/95
91.40
ELVIN SAF_TY
SUPPLY
REPAIRS
10- 4540- 449 -44
247.C5 +
•ff f.f
i* *-CKS
3]
-
x]77153
03/13/85
86.76
ENGIN° PARTS
SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTAS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
86.76 +
f#f#f#
* *r— CKS -
-- -761
ezl
017156
:3/13/85
443.19
FAIRVIEW 40SPITAL
1ST AID SUPPLIES
10- 4510 - 440 -44
C:f
443.19 t
e]
Ih
-- — ----
- - - - --
- - --
_. i ».CKS._.
_—jeA
G"
777164
C3/C9/85
30.21
FREEWAY DODGE
INC
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
71
071164
U3/08/85
77.18
FREEWAY DODGE
INC
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
72
I
107.39 +
i3
7•
#rf ##r
**r- CKS_._...
:19
s
1985'C1 iF =DINM CHECK RL ER C3 -18 -85 IE 5
;I - --CH_CC_K_ QL __ AwQUNT V OS ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT No. TNV- a P -O- A MFSSAGF__,�
7,771
-I "I 0771
^771
*r **
0771
nii 1
0771
^_•771
7771
' 0711
'?771
0771
!?771
I �77e
U77e
_ "17 7 e
I
OTIi
')7Tc
.rt.
^71e
U77 -e
+)77e.
6772
0772
• :
+rrr
-�: C772
f 0772
"JF.- X7.72
�7T2
0772
Z3$ %��_
9.x(1
G_ *- VEM.S_IN'
R P•ATp DARTS
In 4540- 540 -54
+
83
-3/08185
17.50
GIVENS IN:
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
'
26.50
• r
• ** -CKS s
85
:3/08185
REPAIR PA.QTS
4I 454Q801 -80
65
]3/J8/85
15.12
GOODIN CO
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 801 -80
'
-
- --- -
132.42
sl
CKS.*
•rr - "
94
X3/13185
- _19.0
6EIERAL -camMl haCFT�LS EQU_I�REAJAl
10- 4.2.26 - 371- 0
la
04
,.3/' -,1 95
51.5D
GEN -IAL C]MMUNICATNS
CONT REPAIRS
10 -4248- 560 -56
L1
94
;3/13/85
100. ~3
GENERAL COMMUNICATNS
RADIO SERU
10- 4294 - 420 -42
Z`
44 -f
03/03/85
377.50
G�NEIAL�OMMU!VIGATNS
RADIO SUPPLIES
10 -429k- 4.4.0 -44
��
94
03/13%85
266.25
GENERAL COMMUNICATNS
RADIO SERV
10- 4294 - 560 -56
94
j3/07/85
73.23
GENERAL COMMUNICATNS
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
I?,�
94
_73..2.3
GENE3A.L- LqHMUhIC.ALNS DAR -TS
1 as! _462D._SbIl 56
94
?3/ ^7/>?5
73.23-
GENERAL COMMUNICATNS
CORRECTION
10- 4620- 560 -56
"
867.48
•
•r
;
*r* -CKS
Jb ..._
..__;:3/11_/- g5j44.Z5
G__.8._K_SiE1LLCE.S.�- �As.NDRY
10- 4262-nM1 -30
'36
3/11/85
282.95
G B K SEPVICES
UNIFORM ALLONENCE
10 -4262- 560 -56
"
36
= 3/11/85
202.20
G B K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 646 -64
v6_-
.i3/11185
202.)0
G & K SERVICE-,
1 A INDRY
41l- 4262- 800 -80
1 9431 .30
07_ ---
__ -.93/1- 3/95 --
1,- 3$3_. -7iJ-
G- $�GGS_BE_R
I NYL,Y79R1f
-
)7
L3i_e/85
1.390.80
GRIGGS BE =R
INVENTORY
53 -4630- 842 -84
G7
L,3/0-8r85
1,341.35
GRIGGS BEER
INVENTORY
50- 4630 - 862 -86
4,115. �.5
L:
♦ *
�
;a
(eo
* **-CKS ,
�9
G3/'7185
35.47
GEMUIN_ PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
UQ
�3/i7/85
13.98
GENUINE PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
U9
'13/13785
37.14
GENUINE PARTS
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
�•�
U9
03%13/8°
11.32
GENUINE PARTS
PARTS
10- 4620- 560 -56
"
:39
03/13/85
81.20
GENUINE PARTS
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
;o
1 79.1 1
* ** -CKS
a,
.z
e,
.
13
G3/13/85
240.10
LEROY H LTBBY
CONT SERV
40- 4200 - 800 -80
13
03/07/85
240.30
LEROY H LI3BY
SERVICES
40- 4200 - 800 -80
--
- - - --
_4.1Q,.3 O
*
���
14
03/ 7/85
103. 92
TOLL COMPANY
WELDING SUPPLIES
10- 4610- 560 -56
11
14----
C.3 /Q7185
9,33E
_DLL COMPANY
Hc- 1 DTNGS- UP._PI TFS
10- 4610 -$60 -5
7
72
14
03/07/85
142.23
TOLL COMPANY
WELDING SUPPLIES
10- 4610- 560 -56
1.
14
03/)7/85
49948
TDLL COMPANY
MELDING SUPPLIES
10- 4610 - 560 -56
,
1965 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT V =VDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0.
304.°3
I
j3/11/85 61.60 HAR NEI LJMB =R CO GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504_318 -
I' 077221 ?3/11185 —26.40 HAR NOD LJMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 6504 -318-
_! I
SR.00 •
-1_ 777122 L3/11/85 _ _185.76 HE DBE IG Py1E
& SONS CO GE!- SUPS
-- — 185.76 +
� I
I
•i l "77228 )3/11/85 51.58 HTLLSTROM AUTO SUP Y REPAIR PARTS
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
GEN SUPPLIES
SALT
POLICE SERV —
CONT REPAIRS
03 -18 -85 PAGE 6
# P -O- # MESSAGE _
*+•-CKS
a
I'
I^
_ I, ]
**k-CKS T.]
I4
- w— ")U•. —OU 2OU
- - - -
- -'— —
— -51.58
IIo
•
f f t i* k
?
I
°I
•
•** -CKS Iz]I
''77234
U3 /C7 /85
5.70
HOOT_V-CL=ANEFiS-
•
C77234
03/13/85
7. 0
MOOT =N CL-ANERS
Ant
.
10 -4538- 440 -44
12.20
*
•
rr•rr*
I:;
a.
777244 -
- 03/11/85 --
- - - -_. 97.74
HAYDEN MUIPHY
•
077279
1)3/13!85
97.74
*
Qt8 -OWN
f177145
03/O8/85
16.51
ROBERT B HILL
•I
'i
ff•rf *
J3/13/R5
03/13785
16.51
•
•
I"
077249
----- -• ---
- ^3/13/85
10C.30
WILLIAM HJFFMAN
I..�-
077279
93/1318'
100.00
J --RRYS
•I �
HOW=
CORRECTION
10- 4504 - 325 -30
077279
J3/13185
78.33
JERRYS
•i'
071253
13/11/85
32.)0
HUMPIIEV RADIATOR
-
- - --
-
32 . J n
•
• l
* ► t • •
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 325 -30
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
GEN SUPPLIES
SALT
POLICE SERV —
CONT REPAIRS
03 -18 -85 PAGE 6
# P -O- # MESSAGE _
*+•-CKS
a
I'
I^
_ I, ]
**k-CKS T.]
I4
- w— ")U•. —OU 2OU
I
13/11/85
3 -7 .66
IIo
FOODS
27- 4540 - 662 -66
?
I
°I
•
•** -CKS Iz]I
10- 4262- 420 -42
-- - -- — -- — j'-
JERRYS
10- 4266- 470 -47
W'LDING SUPPLIES
10- 4510- 440 -44
�a
r* *.CKS
40- 4504 - 802 -80
Ant
.
10 -4538- 440 -44
"'l
PARTS
27- 4620 - 671 -66
• ••. CKS
I:;
a.
10 -41 nn- 4Jn -42
10- 4248 - 560 -56
„I.
lei
** *— CKS
I'f
]1
I]2
0
077278
13/11/85
3 -7 .66
JERRYS
FOODS
GEN SUPPLIES
10-4504- 500 -5C
•
017218
3/rS185
14.36
JERRYS
FOODS
W'LDING SUPPLIES
10- 4510- 440 -44
077218
13/07/85
7. 014
JERRYS
FOODS
PARTS
27- 4620 - 671 -66
52.96
"I-
077279
1)3/13!85
___1x.04
_ J =RRYS
Qt8 -OWN
PY
GEN SUFPL.IES
10 -4504- 260 -26
•I'
L
077219
177279
J3/13/R5
03/13785
70.21
29.57
JERRYS
JERRYS
OUR OWN
OUR OWN
HOWE
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
GEN SUPPLIES
1D- 4504 - 301 -30
10 -4504- 318 -30
'
077279
93/1318'
79.33-
J --RRYS
OUI OWN
HOW=
CORRECTION
10- 4504 - 325 -30
077279
J3/13185
78.33
JERRYS
OUR OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 325 -30
•,"
077279
03/13/85
78.33
JERRYS
OUR OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 325 -30
„I.
lei
** *— CKS
I'f
]1
I]2
0
. 1985 1:. JF 701NA CHECK RE.._.�T_R 03 -18 -85 PAGE
__CHECK_N0. Oa7
i R 1 f f i
I,
P77311
^77311
077311
I'aL -fff #+f
077313
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
wjrl3ro:) 391615.70 EASTSIOE 3= VERAGE INVENTORY 50- 4630- 822 -82
C3/C8/85 3*589.75 EASTSIDE 4EVERAGE INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84
J3 /!37185__ --- 4 +2_7E.R - EASTSi.aE_9EVERAG1- TNVF NSDRY SSa- 41130- 862 -86
109858.30 • - -
03/73/85
67.95 JOHN H FOSTER CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56
t
s
_r ,
_ ?71374
"! u773D4
y 03/77/85
03/07/85
077219
03/13785
89.15
JERRYS
OUR OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 328 -30
=
LUMBER
277279
ri77279
- 73/13/85_..
7.77
- -34.
�J_.RRY�
OU,�4uy�jDW= GEN_S�1PP_LIE.S
1.0- 42InA2
CO
!
x772/9
„3 /if 3/35
3/13785
?3
9.40
JERRYS
OUR OWN
HOW_
GEN SUPPLIES
-450-4-
10 -4504- 440 -44
I�
! 1_...'.
077?79
3/13/85
23.57_
JERRYS
JERRYS
OUR OWN
OUR OWN
HOPE
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 470 -47
'
�1.
-'^
01127973/85
_
3/1
2.69
JERRYS
OUR OWN
HOWE
GEN, SUPPLIES
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 5 520 -52
10- 4504- 560 -56
°
'!I
077279
n77279___
„3/13/85
^3/13/8 5
112.28
JERRYS
OUR OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 646 -64
I; °•
077279
_ - - °`-
)3 /13 /e5
- 4'10._
7.' ?5
JERRIS--O
3- 4Wi1_H[ZWE
-'
^77279
- 3/13195
1509
JERRYS
JERRYS
OUR OWN
OUR OWN
HOWE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 646 -64
--
077279
G3/13/85
7.79
J= RR1fS_pU.�
Qy��r�W}
HOWE
AMMONIA
PARTS
10 -4572- 420 -42
-
071279
3/13/85
30.95
JERRYS
OUR OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4620_5.60 -56
23- 4504- 610 -61
6
"
077279
^77279
03/13/85
93/13%$5_._
82997
JERRYS
OUI OWN
HOWE
CLEAN SUPFLIES
27- 4512- 661 -66
a'
n7727v
:3/13/95
_ - - -_ -7_.26
7.73
_J_RRY%OUR.-QaN._HONE
ruE.MlQALS
7- 45.64 - 6.6.1 -_6b
r
=_�
n77219
03/13/45
35.83
J_RRYS
J_RRYS
OUR OWN
OUR
HOWE
PARTS
27- 4620 - 662 -66
_
-
077279
_�_3 /13/8_$
5..29
-37.63
�0E_RRY$
OWN
�W�HONE
HOWE
REPAIR PARTS
REPIAIR PARTS
28 -4540- 708 -70
_
^77279
33/13%85
-9U
JERRYS
OUR OWN
HOWE
REPAIR PARTS
410- 454Q�Q] - -g0
40- 4540 - 803 -80
2<
'
709.52 *
f+ #_CKS '•
2s6 -._-
0.3/11/85 -
10.96
_JUST US LUMBER
GEN- S_UPLIrS_.-
10 -4504- 31_8 -3D
_
10.56 •
a
I'
-
_ ._- _ --
- -- --
- - --
--
- -
- -
-- # # #- CKS-- -
-I
1772?'9
3/13/85
10^. ?O
WALTER
JOINSON
POLICE SEP.V
10- 4100 - 420 -42
"'
+## -CKS
`775 2
n773U2
3713/85
03/13/85
29406.37
4.379.14
KUETiER
DIST CO
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 822 -82
"
KUETHER
DIST CO
INVENTORY
50 -4630- 842 -84
r
-- -- ---
- --
6 7 85.51 •
I.
i R 1 f f i
I,
P77311
^77311
077311
I'aL -fff #+f
077313
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
wjrl3ro:) 391615.70 EASTSIOE 3= VERAGE INVENTORY 50- 4630- 822 -82
C3/C8/85 3*589.75 EASTSIDE 4EVERAGE INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84
J3 /!37185__ --- 4 +2_7E.R - EASTSi.aE_9EVERAG1- TNVF NSDRY SSa- 41130- 862 -86
109858.30 • - -
03/73/85
67.95 JOHN H FOSTER CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56
t
s
_ ?71374
"! u773D4
y 03/77/85
03/07/85
81.13
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
LUMBER
10 -4604- 646 -64
n7T3[)4 -_
_ U.3/11 /8 -9
63.27
1.z.. qg
KNOX
1(N0�1lJMB::t3_C4
LUMBER
CO
LUMBER
GEN
10- 4604 - 646 -64
- n77304
;3%11/85
- _-- -_
20.73
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
S.U.2P13Es
40- 45D.4- 8OZ.BQ
0773:4
1x3/08/85
6.28
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
GEN SUPPLIES
40 -4504- 803 -80
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 802 -80
- -
- -------- --- --
- - -- 18.4_.._22_•___
i R 1 f f i
I,
P77311
^77311
077311
I'aL -fff #+f
077313
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
wjrl3ro:) 391615.70 EASTSIOE 3= VERAGE INVENTORY 50- 4630- 822 -82
C3/C8/85 3*589.75 EASTSIDE 4EVERAGE INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84
J3 /!37185__ --- 4 +2_7E.R - EASTSi.aE_9EVERAG1- TNVF NSDRY SSa- 41130- 862 -86
109858.30 • - -
03/73/85
67.95 JOHN H FOSTER CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56
t
s
19E5 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -18 -85 PAGE 8
CHECK NO.
DATE
__ -.-
._ -.. _. - -__ __.,___-
I � ffff • f
i•I 077317
u3/07/85
`
07731 7
03i07i85
X77317
13/07/95
07 131 7
03/17/85
77731 7—
3 /Q7i85 - --
077317
u3/C7185
•I 077318
03/11/85
077318
C °3/13/85_
^7731 --
ff fff.
I�
-'3/11/85- -
67.95 •
. f f f .
^77331
03/77/85
,I
-- _.-__- .-
-.- -�_
LAHASS CORPORATION
CAPITAL OUTLAY
f+ f- C K S I
1
1 54.1 2
L4WS)N PRODUCTS
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 325 -30
^j
'
44.66
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 328 -30
_
782.10
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 646 -64
„I
nl
381. -9
-313.
- LAWSOY PRODUCTS
r TOOLS
10- 4580 - 440 -44
^77332 -_
- -- --
^_.3/13/85
R6
LAWS)N PRODUCTS
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
I
I-�
fif ff i
301.76
LAWSDN PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 801 -80
•i'I
19977.59 +
_ - -!
-
94.80
LEEF BROS INC
LAUNDRY
10- 4262- 440 -44
- 077341
28.90 �-
LEEF PROS INC _
GEN SUPPLIES
23- 4504 - 611_61
GE4 S!LP PII�S_
12.60
LEEF BPOS INC
LAUNDRY
27- 4262 - 662 -66
SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
136.20 •
185.59
�"
'?77323. .._ _ _0_3./13/85 _ - -0
- _- LIAHIFF
- 15.170 +
tff +f f
•f ^-71325 03/08/85 125.88 LONG LAKE =ORD TRACT
+ + +-CKS
BEM — SUPPLIES L�4.544- 54On44 - - - - - - -- — - -- -; '�
PARTS
•
. f f f .
^77331
03/77/85
4,062.00
LAHASS CORPORATION
CAPITAL OUTLAY
4062.]0 +
'
X77532
�3/13/d5
35.17-
LEAGJE OF
HN CITIES
CONT SERV
n77332
n3/13/85
39500.70
LEAGUE OF
MN CITIES
CONT SERV
^77332 -_
- -- --
^_.3/13/85
35.'_D
LEAGUE OF
MN CITIES
CONT SERV
I
I-�
fif ff i
39500. 0 +
•i'I
^77341
03/11/85
43.15
M 8 I IND
SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
- 077341
81.19
M 8 I IND
SUPPLY
GE4 S!LP PII�S_
077341
03/08185
61.25
M 8 I IND
SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
`i
185.59
�f
C77342
03/').9/85
534.87
MAC OU =EN
EQUIP INC
REPAIR PARTS -
• I
L
534.87 +
I
10- 4620- 560 -56
10 -4900- 300 -39
10 -4200- 140 -14
10- 4200 - 140 -14
1n- L?nn- 1Ln.9L
10-4504-301-30
10- 4504 - 301 -30
10 -45 4504- 646 -64
10- 4540 - 560 -56
�" rffaff
^77344_ ____ 73/13/85 35.2,1 MEQ OXYf -4 9 EQUIP EQUIP MAINT 10 -4274- 469 -44
35.28
• _—
!ffff •
C77346 53/13/85 19262.25 MET N WASTE C L COMM BLDG PERMITS 10 -3095- 000 -00
l
. •I
I
+ + +-CKS
�+•rCKS
• *+- CKS
I � "I
)l
A
i7 C,
1985' Cl JF EDINA CHECK R� f -:'R 03-18-85 -GE 9
F---.CHECK-NQ.-.DA.TE- AMOUNT
19262.25 •
C17352 3/13 /85
178.?D •
{?77355__- C!3/r•7185 GEN -SJUEP-L= 10-45
07 ?3 5 3 ?3/L7/85 111 .?o MINNESOTA GLOW GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-646-64
171.40 a
*►•-CKS
■•• -CKS
i
r'17365
Wr 366
077366
-(136.6.
'-13/13/85 100.70 BERT MERF-rLD POLICE SERVICE 10-4100-420-42
101.10 •
03/11f85 241.71 MINNESOTA BAR INVENTORY 50-4632-822-82
03/11/85 457.40 MINNESOTA BAR INVENTORY 50-4632-842-84
19011.13
L� A-6 L__O
3 /07 8 5
232.k65
3M ALARIM 5:- V-I,ZE-
CONT. SERV
13.80
077318
03/07/85
29432*60
232.65
4e996.95
22
777359
3/1 1/85
35.19
077378
Rr' ' P A 1
4 5 5-6 0 56
D77359
U3/11785
38.2R
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-560-56
077359
03/!,7/85
35..;3
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTAS
19-4540-560-56
"77359-- --
---_ -- _143/11/85_
17.31
Hlyy_ TORO T C_
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 56.0 ffw-5-6
J/7359
u3/j7/85
110.70
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
27-4540-662-66
236.51
071360
u3/07185
57.25
MINNESOTA WANK -R
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 - 56
^7136J
_'3/11/85
104.75
MINNESOTA WANNER
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
071360
Q 3 /9? /,5
'7
___ MINNESOTA -WAXNE R--C.oN-T-.jR
-Ep-AIRS-
0!!-4248T560-w5�6------------
r173614
L' 3 1-3 / 9 5
9 9.50
MINNESOTA WANNER
CONT REPAIRS
10-4248-560-56
011360,
143/C,7/85
33.50
MTNNESOTA WANK 7-R
GEN SUPPLIES
10-4248-560-56
?77360
03/07/85
104 -?0
MINNESOTA A XLR
CONT REPAIRS
1Q:_42.4-8=5_60 -56
(77360
03107f85
35.75
MINNESOTA WANNER
CONT REPAIRS
10-4248-560-56
17736U
03/07/85
47o?O
MINNESOTA WANNER
GEN SUPPLIES
10-4534-335-30
077360
-
-85.5Q----M'.NNES-OTA-WANN=-
&--------GLM-SUP-P-L.IES
12-_430.4.T- 646 -6.4
C 713 61:
"3/ ^7/85
23.50
MINNESOTA WANq7R
GEV SUPPLIES
10-4504-646-64
071360
03/C-7/85
49.60
MINNESOTA WANNER
REPAIR PARATS
10-4540-560-56
- ------ --.-
695 15 *
r'17365
Wr 366
077366
-(136.6.
'-13/13/85 100.70 BERT MERF-rLD POLICE SERVICE 10-4100-420-42
101.10 •
03/11f85 241.71 MINNESOTA BAR INVENTORY 50-4632-822-82
03/11/85 457.40 MINNESOTA BAR INVENTORY 50-4632-842-84
19011.13
L� A-6 L__O
3 /07 8 5
3-3,10
13.80
077318
03/07/85
29432*60
4e996.95
971378
U3/07/85
422*53
077378
03/07/85
49422.50
MARK V11 SALES INC
Z1AFli V11 54L _S KC
MARK V11 SALES INC
MARK Vil SALES INC
INVENTORY
INVENTORY
INVENTORY
50-4630-822-82
51--A.6-3"- -4-2m-U
50- 4630- 862 -86
50-4630-862-86
* **-CKS
* *--CKS.- - -;
75
>.
NOTT COMPANY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56
OFFICE PR03UCTS CAPITAL OUTLAY 10- 4900- 600 -60
03 -18 -85 PAGE 10
* ** -CKS
*** -CKS
3
4
S
0
7
. 1D
10
�1
1]
19I`
=o
16
zc
]ftl
].7
* ** -CKS ;,I•
***- CKS -- '�
+z
• • •- LKS____ -^ 1
*** -CKS
*** -CKS
1.77421 - 0.3/ ^7/85 7,0.20 OLS04 CHAIN & C4BLE REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 662 -66
-- 79.20 * ---- - -iD11
v..I
1985 CITY
OF rDINA
CHECK REGISTER
v.
11509.22
—
1 9509.22
CHECK NO.
r774u2 03/13/85
AMOUNT
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. IN
-
_ _
-� _
_VEN002
(177416 3/!'8/85
�I
'377378
C3/07/85
4"22.50-
MARK V11 SALES INC
CORRECTION
50- 4630- 862 -86
FOSS
PRINTING
GEN SUPPLIES
11rF51.95
J"
L•'
__ _. _. _______
. —__
X77379
3/,)8/85
35.40
METRO FON_ COMM
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226- 301 -30
I'
35.40
__-- _.�
b '
X77429
'3/13/85
95.00
^77341
u3/ ^7/85
141.-0
STAR 3 TRI9UN:
ADVERTISING
10- 4212 - 140 -14
X77361
C3 /01/85
75.20
STAR & TRIBUNE
ADVERTISING
10- 4212 - 160 -16
INVENTORY
^77381
1:3/07/85
94.x'0
STAR & TRIBUNE
ADVERTISING
10_- 4212- 420 -42
PEPSI
C77381
73107%9 5
103.40
_
STAR & TRIBUNE
ADVERTISING
10- 4212- 490 -49
077429
077381
u3/07/85
63.57
STAR & TRIBUNE
ADVERTISING
10- 4212 - 660 -66
50- 4632- 862 -86
-- - -
- -
-- 477.10 r
�I
�r 'I
r *fr ►♦
- - --
017355
— 03/13/85
126.10
MCGUIRE 2OBERT
TREE INSPECTIONS
10- 4242- 353 -30
�.
C77 38 5
03/13/85
720. ^0
MCGUIRE ROBERT
TREE TRIMMING
60 -1300- 012 -18
- --
- - --
- - - - -_ 840.30 *
- -- —
i
I
"(-
077348
03/^7/95
44.47
NTL ATOMI( MOTOR
REPAIR PARATS
10- 4540- 560 -56
44.47 *
NOTT COMPANY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56
OFFICE PR03UCTS CAPITAL OUTLAY 10- 4900- 600 -60
03 -18 -85 PAGE 10
* ** -CKS
*** -CKS
3
4
S
0
7
. 1D
10
�1
1]
19I`
=o
16
zc
]ftl
].7
* ** -CKS ;,I•
***- CKS -- '�
+z
• • •- LKS____ -^ 1
*** -CKS
*** -CKS
1.77421 - 0.3/ ^7/85 7,0.20 OLS04 CHAIN & C4BLE REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 662 -66
-- 79.20 * ---- - -iD11
v..I
077430 X3/11/95
_ --
11509.22
—
1 9509.22
r774u2 03/13/85
57.95
***..CKS
57.95
i
(177416 3/!'8/85
19195.73
19195.00
03/13/85
187.00
PAUL
FOSS
PRINTING
GEN SUPPLIES
NOTT COMPANY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56
OFFICE PR03UCTS CAPITAL OUTLAY 10- 4900- 600 -60
03 -18 -85 PAGE 10
* ** -CKS
*** -CKS
3
4
S
0
7
. 1D
10
�1
1]
19I`
=o
16
zc
]ftl
].7
* ** -CKS ;,I•
***- CKS -- '�
+z
• • •- LKS____ -^ 1
*** -CKS
*** -CKS
1.77421 - 0.3/ ^7/85 7,0.20 OLS04 CHAIN & C4BLE REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 662 -66
-- 79.20 * ---- - -iD11
v..I
—
****r*
***..CKS
077428
03/13/85
187.00
PAUL
FOSS
PRINTING
GEN SUPPLIES
23- 4504- 611 -61
J"
L•'
__ _. _. _______
. —__
?87.00 *
"'•
__-- _.�
b '
X77429
'3/13/85
95.00
PEPSI
COLA
BOTTLING
CONCESSIONS
28- 4624 - 704 -70
;;
477429
03/07/85
390.25
PEPSI
COLA
BOTTLING
INVENTORY
5n- 4632- 822 -82
477429
J3/07/85
321.30
PEPSI
COLA
BOTTLING
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 842 -84
"
077429
+3/07/85
323.35
PEPSI
COLA
BOTTLING
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 862 -86
1985 CI. OF EDINA
CHECK_N�._- DATE
.I
� f f• i f i
° n77434 03/ +07/
^,77430 X3/]7)185
'277439
CHECK REb,STER
1,129.60 +
16.64 +
19256.57 PRIOR LAKE AG
448 9 PRTO.R LAK'_ AG
1,704.66 •
j X77441 ' +3/L7/85 162.70
162.70
THE PRINT SHOP
BLACKTOP
of —17no
PRINTING
10- 4522 - 318 -30
4n -45 92 -An i- Rn
10- 4600- 628 -62
03 -18 -85 PAGE 11
N D_fl_ M mrcztr•_c
• *• CKS '
7
0
I°
± +- CKS —_. 'z
I,
,a.
I_z
21
***-CKS -
^77445
03/ =!7/85
623.40
PIPER CALNENSON B CO
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
^77445
)3/ "7/85
310.32
PAPER GALYENSON & CO
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
- _.. - - - - --
- - - --
933.72 +
_"
n77446
:13/08/85
96.45
PIONEER RIM 8 WHEEL
REPAIRS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
- I ff • •• i
i
CKS I1,
017457
03/13/85
7,745.00
R.L.GOULO 3 CO.INC.
MOWERS
2T -4930- 662 -66
j
79745.00 +
0I746.9
^3_/1_3/5
— 44eR�..
—�279L Q�lV_�ay _
-I-NV- NV I-TDgY
5.0- 4_6.32- 8.2.2 -82
07746J
+)3%13/85
191.20
ROYAL GROWN BEV
INVENTORY
_51- 4632- 842 -84
0/746
03/13185
114.95
ROYAL GROWN BEV
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 862 -86
; ?I.
i
CKS
^77461
03/ 8185
25.95
RENTAL EOJIP & SALES
TOOLS
10- 4580 - 353 -30
°I
25.95 •
I,
I
^77463 - - 03/13/85
,. ^77463 03/13/85
077463 013/13/85
II
^77465 G3/ "7/85
1 ,410.' 5
2,492.77
1,769,00
5,671.95 +
351.10
zcl_In
REX )TST
REX GIST
ocv rarer
INVENTORY
INVENTORY
T.W Cflr AD
50- 4630- 822 -82
50- 4630- 842 -84
SD- 4A,kn -RA2- RA
RICHFIELD PLUMB B CO CONT REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 708 -70
A7
.11
i.•* -CKS_ L..
,z
•+* -CKS
1-
1985 CITY OF COIN..
CHECK REGISTER
03 -18 -85 PAGE 12
�
1177479
y; I
r.rtr.
017492
^774,55
^77491
I
_
-CHECK NO._
DATE
AMOUNT ^_
VENDOI
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV* N P.O.
# M'SSAGE_-
077493
03/07/85
V
SOUTHDALE
FORD
P. =PAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
,3/07/85
52.35
R & R 5 °E.IALTIES
GASOLINE
28- 4612 - 707 -70
„
- _
52.35 *
-
PARTS
('
017467 --
03 /13/85
205.10
ROYAL_ - TEV_RAGE CD_
-ROYAL
INVENTORY
50- 4630 - 822_82
J.
* **=CKS
"i
?!7467
u3/ R/85
670.77
BEVERAGE CO
_
INVENTORY
50- 4630 - 842 -84
3/15i?5
563.56
STATE BLOC IFlSP
7f467
03/08/85
515. 20
ROYAL BEVERAGE CO
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 862 -86
SURCHARGE TAX
10- 3113 - 000 -00
;.
�- - - --
- ----
-- 19322.30 *
a
2,3113/85
18. ^0
D04 3TREICHER GUNS
AMMUNITION
10- 4572 - 420 -42
_;!3_/13/85
�..,.'
..ar.r
AMMUNITION
10- 4572 - 420 -42
J3/07IS5
42.23
arr -CKS
RADIO EQUIP
1D- 4914 - 421 -42
^7747u - -
-_'- 313/85
25.`0
-DR ROCKWELL
MEDICAL SERV
10- 4100 - 481 -48
------ - - - - -"
25. "O *
14j.
.n
'
rrrrr r ._ - -
-- ------ •--
'--- - - - ---
.-��_ �
�-...
rra -CKS
•'
'lf7475
J3/11/85
245.67
JOHNSON_
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560_56
_
x77475
3/11%85
410.25
RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
-
77475
� 3/11 /�? 5
242.;0
RUFFRIOGE JOHNSON
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
I•
i
^77475 _ -
_3/13/85 --
_- 1.531.60
-- RUFFRTDGE JOHNSON
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560-56
,. rararr
L,, (
1177479
y; I
r.rtr.
017492
^774,55
^77491
077485
rr.77486
077493
r77496
4.19
0774 6
J3/08/85
REPAIR
077493
03/07/85
V
SOUTHDALE
• +* -CKS
_- 077490 - -___ j3/08/85 61.96 SHERWIN WILL IAS PAINT 10- 4544- 325 -30
I 61.96 r - - --
x,77491
03/13/85
x77492 _ _
_ 03/13/55
017492
J3/91/85
^77491
03/•''7/85
�.."
L
077493
03 IC? 185
4.19
^77493
J3/08/85
REPAIR
077493
03/07/85
16.68
SOUTHDALE
FORD
P. =PAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
,3/07/85
52.35
R & R 5 °E.IALTIES
GASOLINE
28- 4612 - 707 -70
„
- _
52.35 *
-
PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
J3.
SOUTHO &LE
FORD
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
67.81 *
* **=CKS
-
-
3/15i?5
563.56
STATE BLOC IFlSP
BLDG PERMITS
10- 3095- 000-00
03/13/85
52.:D
STATE BLDS INSP
SURCHARGE TAX
10- 3113 - 000 -00
;.
615.56
2,3113/85
18. ^0
D04 3TREICHER GUNS
AMMUNITION
10- 4572 - 420 -42
_;!3_/13/85
31.35
_ OON_STREI_ER GUNS
AMMUNITION
10- 4572 - 420 -42
J3/07IS5
42.23
DO41 STREI :HER GUNS
RADIO EQUIP
1D- 4914 - 421 -42
91.58 *
• +* -CKS
_- 077490 - -___ j3/08/85 61.96 SHERWIN WILL IAS PAINT 10- 4544- 325 -30
I 61.96 r - - --
x,77491
03/13/85
x77492 _ _
_ 03/13/55
017492
J3/91/85
^77491
03/•''7/85
30.29
'!77491
03/13/85
REPAIR
077492
03/[7/85
39.43
SOUTH04'LEFIRD
�.."
L
077493
03 IC? 185
4.19
^77493
J3/08/85
REPAIR
077493
03/07/85
16.68
SOUTHDALE
FORD
30.29
SOUTHDA'LE
FORD
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
39.43
SOUTH04'LEFIRD
REPAIR
PARTS
10_4540 -5606
4.19
SOUTHDALE
FORD
REPAIR
PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
16.68
SOUTHDALE
FORD
P. =PAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
23.62
SOUTHDXLE FOPO
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
50.92
SOUTHDAl E
FORD
REPAIR
PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
2.68
SOUTHO &LE
FORD
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
67.81 *
19915.65 SOUTHSIDE DIST COIN[
4,10205 SOUTHSIDE DIST COINC
586.40 SOUTHSIDE DIST COINC
6.504.90 •
INVENTORY
INVENTORY
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 822 -82
50- 4630- 842 -84
50 -46 30- 862 - 86
IML
,4
75 �
f. •.i c
®m
0
•9F5 C1. OF EDINA
.. . - - C H E C"1 ) A__QA_U_
CHECK REGISTER
Y�_
lg5.,44
"77495
u3/_9 8 5
5*PO
STAi< r-LE:TTRONICS
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-330-30
7—
971595
/07/85
83*44
SUN
ADVERTISING
10-4210-140-14
077505
03/11/85
0 7 i), F 2'
C'3/C7/85
ADVERTISING
10-4210-140-14
CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-560-56
14^.'70 -
SUBURBAN
311502
1J3 7/85
52.JO
SURURRAN
CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-560-56
_ ^77502
'?3/17/85
_ 39.76
SUBU13A;4
CHEVROLET
REPAIR PART$
0-
10-454560-56
`177502
03/11/95
11.36
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-560-56
077502
03/11185
21.10
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-560-56
23.45
ST PAUL BOOK
____26_4..22
10-4504-440-44
r7750A
"3/07/85
'77533
J3/C8/85
28.16
SUBURBAM
3LUM8 SUP
GEN SUPPLIES
40 -4504- 807 -80
^77573__
'73/x_9/85 _
21 .57
S U 8 U 13 A!N
3LUM9 -SUP
0715178
40- 454(L801_89
(1775 03
03/13%85
25.34
SUBURBAN
3LUMB SUP
REPAIR PARTS
40-4540-805-80
r775,;3
3 /1 3 /85
3P.37
SUBUIBA:4
21LUMB SUP
REPAIR PARTS
40-4540-805-80
03-18-85 PAGE 13
a P-n- m mcc-. rr
10
•••-CKS .1
1l3
lg5.,44
••CKS
971595
/07/85
83*44
SUN
ADVERTISING
10-4210-140-14
077505
03/11/85
18*24
SUN
ADVERTISING
10-4210-140-14
***-CKS
r
--/c 7/85
2.52
ST PAUL BO)K
GEN SUPPLIES
10-4504-420-42
^775J9
.3/13/85
23.45
ST PAUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
10-4504-440-44
r7750A
"3/07/85
^7150°
3/11/85
35.24
ST PAUL BOOK
OFFICE SUPPLIrS
13-4516-160-16
0715178
3/,-8/85
246.3?
ST PAUL 809K
OFFICE SUPP
10- 4516 - 510 -51
^7750h
1 f?7750?
013/11 f 85
u3/77f85-
3 197 f 8 5
4.86
ISi 74
ST PAUL BOOK
OFFICE SUPP JE 10 -4516 - 510 -51
e
ST PAUL BOOK
OFFICE SUPPLIES
14J
503.12
✓
A, CKS
^7751 2
03 38f85
13
S T R QRR
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-560-56
13.90 •
dLit-- S
.CK
CV 75 16
b 3 /1,25 8 5
251.91
SEARS ROEBUCK
GEN SUPPLIES
10-4504-646-64
L; 3/08/85
SEARS ROEBUCK
TOOLS
10 -45 646- A 4
64
347.61
977518
1)3/08/85
669.92
BERNADINE SCOFIELD
SERVICES
10-4120-490-49
71
669.92 •
72
1_3
***-CKS 75
1905 CITY
OF EOINA
64.40
CHECK REGISTER
UNLIMITED
UNIFORM
03 -18 -85 PAGE 14
-10- 4266- 420 -42
C17551
X3111185
1.594.50
UNIFORMS
UNLIMITED
UNIFORM
CHECK N0.
DATE
AMOUNT
VEND01
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACLOUNT N0. I t
a P.O. A MESSAGE
UNIFORM
ALLOWENCE
10- 4266- 422 -42
,177551
03/11.185
298.40
UNIFORMS
UNLIMITED
UNIFORM
ALLOWENCE
10 -4266- 460 -46
1'J- 4540 -_ 646 -64
I:=
I 077542
- -- - --
1,3/13/85 -
- 7,144.57
THRPE DIST
I NVENTORY
- $62 -86 504630
I'
<
I_
7,144.57 •
^77553
03/C8/85
32.14
-- ' I
ELFCTRIC
CORP
REPAIR
PARTS
40- 4540 - 801 -80
I;e,
X77553
0_3/ ^8/85
89.64
_UNITED_ELECTRIC_CORP
III,
KR
PARTS
40- 4540 - 8'01 -80
^/7553
317.- 5-
077551
03/11/85
64.47
UNIFORMS JNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWENCE
10 -4266- 420 -42
�3=
017551
03/11/8`
64.40-
UNIFJIMS JNLIMITED
CORRECT�N
10- 4266.420 -42
CORP
077551
:3/11/85
64.40
UN ?FORMS
UNLIMITED
UNIFORM
ALLOWENCE
-10- 4266- 420 -42
C17551
X3111185
1.594.50
UNIFORMS
UNLIMITED
UNIFORM
ALLOYENC_
10- 4266- 421 -42
132.65_
UNIF)RMS
JNLIMITEO
UNIFORM
ALLOWENCE
10- 4266- 422 -42
,177551
03/11.185
298.40
UNIFORMS
UNLIMITED
UNIFORM
ALLOWENCE
10 -4266- 460 -46
'� I f f f k f•
fir'' 1 ^_/7558
^77559
i� III
077565
' flit ► f
- f }77569
a:
1.� • f r r f f—
077572
0775 72
0775 72
i
� ff••f•
f' ^77575
�. 77575
Ifto
03/13/85 200.30 GOODYEAR CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 I,
3/131 e5 _ _ 40.50 GOODYEAR CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 646 -64 <n
240.5U • - -- - - i:,
-
03/08/85 121.98 VIKING INJJSTRL CTR GEN SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 800 -810
- - - - - - --
121 .98 •
3/13185
33/13/85
G3/13/85
J3/Cl/85
03/07/85
374.21 •
108.70
930. }0
702.'.5
1.740.45 •
192.51
531.36
EY IND PROPA
VAN 'APER CO
VAN PAPER CO
VAN PAPER CO
GAS OLT
PAPER SUPPLIES
PAPER SUPPLIES
PAPER SUPPLIES
12- 707 -70
50- 4514 - 822 -82
50- 4514- 842 -84
50- 4514- 862 -86
WATE3 PRO)UCTS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64
WATER PRO)UCTS REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80
• ►• -CKS 0111
NI
*•• ^CKS soli
�u
�u
fir - CKS
e3 •
en
9`
e7
e�
•* *-CKS 71
72
,3
)n
,� f
19
'
'I
••f-CKS - h
G 17553 ,T
_ `13/C8/85
203.59
UVIT =]
= L= :TRiC_C_OPP'
REP_A_IR
PARTS
1'J- 4540 -_ 646 -64
I:=
177553
03/8 /85
159.35
UNIT=O
ELECTRIC
CORP
GEN SUPPLIES
40- 4504- $11 -80
^77553
03/C8/85
32.14
UNITED
ELFCTRIC
CORP
REPAIR
PARTS
40- 4540 - 801 -80
I;e,
X77553
0_3/ ^8/85
89.64
_UNITED_ELECTRIC_CORP
Rf7PAIR
PARTS
40- 4540 - 8'01 -80
^/7553
317.- 5-
UNITED
ELECTRIC
COOP
REPAIR
PARTS
_
40- 4540 - 811 -80
�3=
-
03/03/85
71553
03/C3/85
87.38
UNITED
ELECTRIC
CORP
REPAIR
PARTS
40 -4540- 811 -80
i-
017553_
_C_3/ ^8/_85
87.36
_UNITED
ELFC_TRIC
COPP
REPAIR
PARTS
40- 45400 =8 811 -81
.�
I ,
077553
03/C8185
87.38
UNIT =O
ELECTRIC
CORP
CORRECTION
40- 4540 - 811-81
011553
U3/08/85-
132.19
UNITED
ELECTRIC
CUQP
REPAIR
PARTS
40- 4540- 811 -81
077553
--
- ORC8/85
-
- 357.81 _
UNTT_D
ELECTRIC
CUPP
REPAIR
PARTS
50- 4540- 841 -84
1.377.95 •
-- - - -- - - ;,,'
'� I f f f k f•
fir'' 1 ^_/7558
^77559
i� III
077565
' flit ► f
- f }77569
a:
1.� • f r r f f—
077572
0775 72
0775 72
i
� ff••f•
f' ^77575
�. 77575
Ifto
03/13/85 200.30 GOODYEAR CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 I,
3/131 e5 _ _ 40.50 GOODYEAR CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 646 -64 <n
240.5U • - -- - - i:,
-
03/08/85 121.98 VIKING INJJSTRL CTR GEN SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 800 -810
- - - - - - --
121 .98 •
3/13185
33/13/85
G3/13/85
J3/Cl/85
03/07/85
374.21 •
108.70
930. }0
702.'.5
1.740.45 •
192.51
531.36
EY IND PROPA
VAN 'APER CO
VAN PAPER CO
VAN PAPER CO
GAS OLT
PAPER SUPPLIES
PAPER SUPPLIES
PAPER SUPPLIES
12- 707 -70
50- 4514 - 822 -82
50- 4514- 842 -84
50- 4514- 862 -86
WATE3 PRO)UCTS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64
WATER PRO)UCTS REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80
• ►• -CKS 0111
NI
*•• ^CKS soli
�u
�u
fir - CKS
e3 •
en
9`
e7
e�
•* *-CKS 71
72
,3
)n
,� f
•
1985 C.
JF EDINA
MINNESOTA CLAY
CHECK R�
_TCR
03 -18 -85 GE 15
v
109.40 •
"�
- r --�
CHECK
PJ �. DATc_
-. ..�._
AMOUNT
— VE NDO?
ITEM D�SCRIP�LQf�
ACCOUNT NO- INV.
9 P.O. tt MFS CASE —�7�
777575
U3/07/85
360.'10
YAT =R PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 803 -80
1
2
MCNEj -LUS iIEEL
r,EN--S.Upp, I s
777575
3_/_f.7/85_—
35.28—
WA1 R PRODJCTS
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 803 -80
MCNEILUS STEEL
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
1 x119.15 *
463.49 *
—_I4
- - - -- s
g
��
f!f * **
'f.
• *• -CKS
^•77579
3/C7/95
558.DR
WILL1414S STEEL -HDW:
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -45114- 646 -64
777616
677579
_ __31UT /85
— __125.74
—WILL I9H$-r.ESLmf1?Na
GFN -. SUPPLIES
111- 45�1!t X46_64
2
^77579
3/C7195
55.66
WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWc
TOOLS
10 -4580- 301 -30
* :! * *•
777579
077579
J3 /C7 /R5
;3/1'7
94.
47.*_45_
WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE
bl_LLI-kM3—STEr1-11.nWE
CREDIT
10- 4620 - 560 -56
_0_3/07/85 -
;
pITNEr aoyES
_
-05_-
--
PARTS
10- 46 -20-- 560r5
10.10 •
777579
3/11/85
166.97
WILLIAMS STEEL -HOW=
TOOLS
40- 4580- 800 -80
0775/9
X3/11/85
51.37
WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE
TOOLS
40 -4580- 803 -80
LIST
10- 4504 - 600 -60
72
10.0
»
X77584
tt *ftt
!! t r f 4
'177596 03/13/85
I
*!lrff
- - -- -33990 WARNr-R INDUSTRIAL
33.90 *
11.77 _
11.77 •
10 %90
100.10 *
TOOLS
4U- 4580- 800 -80
HENRY WR03LESKI POLICE SERV 10 -4100- 420 -42
. ** -CKS I2a1
29
12]
i
* * *-CKS - -- .,
_t r* -CKS
*** -CKS lav .
^.77593
03/13/85
- 109.40
MINNESOTA CLAY
GEN SUPPLIES
23- 4504 - 611 -61
109.40 •
"�
*•* -CKS -.
07761 3 _ .
13 /_1 3LA 5—
-- 36 ?. -39 --
MCNEj -LUS iIEEL
r,EN--S.Upp, I s
- — 1L'.!L-45.04- 646_ -_64
C/7613
03/11185
95.60
MCNEILUS STEEL
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
463.49 *
��
f!f * **
• *• -CKS
077616
3/13/_55._.
— _— _- 8(L..7S
— FiILLI°0RE t' RP
G.EN--SLppylf-
10- 454_4 - 4.82 -_48
777616
03/11/85
10'?.97
MILLIPORE CORP
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 482 -48
'nz
I •I
187.72 •
c,
* :! * *•
* ** -CKS
0777CU_ _._
_0_3/07/85 -
__10._711 _
pITNEr aoyES
POST4GE
10- 4290 - 510 -51
10.10 •
-
- -' —` —
-' -_ ^/7701 -!,
J3/C7/85
19:7_0
ED1-A 2UB�IC SCH06LS
LIST
10- 4504 - 600 -60
72
10.0
»
(77702.
_?3 [117/15 - - -_
_� _ �4
RE IAIL_9.AI9_StiS1EM OFFIC.E�UPP1Zi�
_ -_S ?- _4516 - ..$.6.06
i-
,
1985 CITY OF '-:DINA
CHECK NO. DATE
"717.13 03/07/85
4- 3 5-
CHECK REGISTER 03-18-85 PAGE 16
T N 0 0 R ITEM DESCRIPTION-A C-OUNT NO* INV, N P.O. LilE.S.SLAGE-_ ;
63.74 • 1
405.9]
ZIP ?r-'NN GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-353-30
405.90 •
30.30 GUY SPEAKr_R COMP INC
30.30 *
INC
381:25
JOE G RTU P 4 VER
675.30
REPAIR PARTS
INSURANCE
WAGES
40-4540-801-80
10- 4260 - 510 -51
27-4100-675-66
10
077718 03/07185
r77 71 9 9 3 /67 /8 5
77_2_o U3/0F/85
J..�
312.10 PHYL HAYWA INST FEE 23- 4100 - 614 -61
312.30 •
16,'?.,"0 MIKE TRAUB INST FEE 23-4100-614-61
160.CO *
120.n0 BONNIE SKELTON INST FEE 23-4100-614-61
120.00 *
I
L11707
u3l"7185
55.110
Am S)Clj;,7TY FOR
DUES
10-4204-420-42
55.0'0
22
07710E
03/07/85
85.93
OATALINE :ORP
SCHOOL
10-4202-422-42
85.03
071709
03/07185
4.'10
R C IDENTIFICATION
GEN SUPPLIES
10-4504-420-42
4.;0
03/07/85
46.80
AMERrCA;N 3AKERIES CO
CONCESSIONS
28-4624-704-70
46.80
X77711
03/07/85
KRST RADIO STATION
LIC & PERMITS
28-4310-708-70
112.)0
•
_,wvii
2
03/07/85
1.102.50
KAY SCHLOSSER
INST FEE
23-4100-614-61
19102.50
•
^77713
03/07/85
528.10
—SUSAN FRAME
INST FEE
23 -4100- 614 -61
OfF714
03/' ?7/85
192.)0
JEAN GPIAPO
INST FEE
23-4100-614-61
192.)o
W7715
T3i07/85
66.'-10
MARGE HEESAARD
INST FEE
23- 4100- 614 -61
66.00
�'3ir3?185
8C.00
MARGARET GJST
INST FEE
23-4100-614-61
33/07!85
KRIS OSTEN
INST FEE
23 -4100- 614 -61
624.70
•
077718 03/07185
r77 71 9 9 3 /67 /8 5
77_2_o U3/0F/85
J..�
312.10 PHYL HAYWA INST FEE 23- 4100 - 614 -61
312.30 •
16,'?.,"0 MIKE TRAUB INST FEE 23-4100-614-61
160.CO *
120.n0 BONNIE SKELTON INST FEE 23-4100-614-61
120.00 *
I
I,; • 1 198; 'C. JF 701% CHECK REb1ST7_R 03-18-85 PAGE 17
CHECK 1
143. DATE A
A40U
NT -V.-MQOR ITEM DESCRIPTTQN A
ACCOUNT NO, TNV, 0 P.Q. a
a mFC1;Arr,
7, '71721
----------- LN§T FFF
[,77 722 J
J3/q7/85 2
270.:10 Nf- 4S S INST FFF 2
2 3=4
279.00
07.1723
_aQ_j_U.oy__Llr R
744.30 F
F, Ii
"117 124 J
J3/37/8 5
456.JO K9J1U_5ASL4_ES 0 .4 INST EFF -
-23--4100-614-61
777.725 1
13/17185 1
168.�Q
- __w ILXIY ;1L TNST FF!.C.-- 1
23-4100-614-61 2
201
163.30 2
- 077726 -
-- 3/f,7/85 3
312.30
J
I 17 2 7
?77729
312.30
23__4J_QO��61_4 _-6 1
544.--,D
J 3/'7!85 5.56 _C.!LL:-AGUES OF ART W9jLK_3_QLQ_ 23625-000-00
5.56
0
35 --8-8-___M3LLt _E_P.AJ_, S 0 N r ONJ---&E R v __21mA2f) O-6 tO_n.6_t__
35.Q8
r77 730 jj 1/17 /Q 24 Sn T r
8 Q.L U (3 1 ART WORK ^,flLn ?A_3A25,_nnn_nn
24.50 •
3 7,a5 '01 D
2_: _2.LE: 13, 3-6
It R T W (IRK-, 23- 25- (30-00
56.90
IZ 732 -33/,77185
___6Q 00 --BARBARA LJNDGRrN ART WORK
0 21-3A25-000 -00
60.90
^77733 0 3/0 7 19 5.---. MARJ3RTr JAD FN ART WORK Snin 23__, 16.25- 000 -DO
19.85 *
—_9.97
PAT -*REF9 ARTWORK S-QLD, 2 3-6-2-5-=0 0 - 0 0
9.97 *
GREEA
4.20
.,3/07/85
--- do ART In.. 625- DD -00
18.20 •
P.71737
_1])_ F-BLUSKE ART YORK lzflln
9.10
k'L_._C7j 7AJ
_Uj
.12 7
7185 2-4.50 CA THY EUL L ART unRK sm n 23-162s-niln-nn
24.50 13
n77739 12a_6_0_,__R RFR.GS_M ART
r77 730 jj 1/17 /Q 24 Sn T r
8 Q.L U (3 1 ART WORK ^,flLn ?A_3A25,_nnn_nn
24.50 •
3 7,a5 '01 D
2_: _2.LE: 13, 3-6
It R T W (IRK-, 23- 25- (30-00
56.90
IZ 732 -33/,77185
___6Q 00 --BARBARA LJNDGRrN ART WORK
0 21-3A25-000 -00
60.90
^77733 0 3/0 7 19 5.---. MARJ3RTr JAD FN ART WORK Snin 23__, 16.25- 000 -DO
19.85 *
—_9.97
PAT -*REF9 ARTWORK S-QLD, 2 3-6-2-5-=0 0 - 0 0
9.97 *
GREEA
4.20
.,3/07/85
--- do ART In.. 625- DD -00
18.20 •
P.71737
_1])_ F-BLUSKE ART YORK lzflln
9.10
k'L_._C7j 7AJ
_Uj
.12 7
7185 2-4.50 CA THY EUL L ART unRK sm n 23-162s-niln-nn
24.50 13
n77739 12a_6_0_,__R RFR.GS_M ART
�;' Q71752
n77752
I
v
03/08/E5 17.50 AUTO SOUND
_03/08/8`. 2Q.50 AUTO SOUND
- - 46.30 •
EQUI° MAINT 10- 4274 - 421 -42
EQUIP MAINT 10- G�74- 6�1.G7
f' //753 - _ _ 03/08/85 _ - 12.50 YM J Y44SA CONF_RENCE 10- 4202- 460 -46
-- -12.50 • -- -- -
_ C_17754 U3/08/85 8.5J SUPRA COLOR PHOTO SUPPLIES 10- 4508 - 421 -42 e"
I" 8.50 * d
se
n //755 -_ 03/08/85 ___ - -- R43.GO MN STAPE DOCUMNT DOCUMZNTS 10- 4642- 420 -42
- - - b' E
43.J0 r - - - -- -
<� 0T 7756 33/08/85 91.98 HENN SHEREFFS D=PT SERV CONTRACTS 10- 4288 - 420 -42 I»
I' 91.98 r
077757 _ U3/07/85 150.70 INTEILACH =N COUNTRY REFUND 10- 2035- 000 -00 F
ru
1985 CITY
OF ED/NA
CHECK REGISTER
03 -18 -85 PAGE 18
~
CH'ECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VEND03
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV*
0 P�� p.� $ -zA,r
12.60
*
'l
1777740
03/O77R5
5.60 61
M BROCKYAY
ART YORK SCLD
23 -3625- 000 -00
1
5 .
+
I
077741
03/07/85 -'-
210.10
KAY SCHLOSSER
ART YORK SOLD
23- 3625- 000 -00
210.10
+
077 74 2
33/07/85
12.60
KATHY GUSTAFSON
ART YORK SCLD
23- 3625- 000 -00
12.50
+
I'�
„I.
077743 -- 03/07/85 - - - -- -14.71 JEAN ADAMS ^ -ART YORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00
14.70
•
-
077744
u3/C•8 /8`
85.00
FED =.iAL SIGNAL CORP
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
zl
�I
85.17
*
-
-
077745
J3/1�3/85
43.45
HACH CHEMICAL
CHEMICALS
40- 4564- 803 -80
43.45
•
Ize
377746
33/ ^8/85
8.''7
STAC MA'VUF B GIST
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
�.
-
8�. °7
-
r
�7T747
u3708/85
32.37
PFC EQUIPMENT
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540- 805 -80
32.77
n7 /I4R
u3/ ^7/85
97.44
GARLIVOS INC
R ^PAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
"
07774E
03/C7185
87.10
GARLANDS INC
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
,
184.44
*
.,
077749
03/G7/85
142.100
OLOMMER ENGNEERING
PARTS
10 -4620- 560 -56
'
142.-30
*
^7775;
03/177185
2?.50
AUTO SOUND /ENTRONTX
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
2p.50
+
"I
..
017751
/17!8/85
98.56
COPY DUPLICATING
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 540 -54
-'03
- --
6
-- 98 t16
+
i
�;' Q71752
n77752
I
v
03/08/E5 17.50 AUTO SOUND
_03/08/8`. 2Q.50 AUTO SOUND
- - 46.30 •
EQUI° MAINT 10- 4274 - 421 -42
EQUIP MAINT 10- G�74- 6�1.G7
f' //753 - _ _ 03/08/85 _ - 12.50 YM J Y44SA CONF_RENCE 10- 4202- 460 -46
-- -12.50 • -- -- -
_ C_17754 U3/08/85 8.5J SUPRA COLOR PHOTO SUPPLIES 10- 4508 - 421 -42 e"
I" 8.50 * d
se
n //755 -_ 03/08/85 ___ - -- R43.GO MN STAPE DOCUMNT DOCUMZNTS 10- 4642- 420 -42
- - - b' E
43.J0 r - - - -- -
<� 0T 7756 33/08/85 91.98 HENN SHEREFFS D=PT SERV CONTRACTS 10- 4288 - 420 -42 I»
I' 91.98 r
077757 _ U3/07/85 150.70 INTEILACH =N COUNTRY REFUND 10- 2035- 000 -00 F
ru
°.
~
Jp IN.
r*ccx nc6rSr7n
03~18~95 p/oc ,v
c+TcK v~.
o,rc ._
�wmunr_ -_
' vc�o�"----___---__-����m�uc�cR��rzmx-__�-_--'xccm/w��o°-�ux._x-e.�.-w
yEscxos- - -
'
1sl.1u
r///,p
e-r'P5
' 60
- "w o3r:-ry cJu-4C'z'L-----
-Du_ '----'----- ' ---10-4202~510-5�1�---'-
J3/~7/85
126.-2
mm mF7-rr couv;IL
yc- oc�nxzP
10~*2c4-510-5 1 '
_ ^
?z�. �� ---_-_---_-
.r//5v
J3/.7 /9
954.29
orns�n poycnc pm/ocx
cmvomucrrow
69~1270-000~os
'17/59
~y'nrs
_ 4.o32 .16
m/Rn%" noxrnc'puuoc __-�
*
nworRucTzow
49986.35 ^
--
' ---- '
nrrn,,
n3,^r'y5
_ 6 6 n .'?
���oav
nvss*x
I
11~4 2c0~8 21 ~8 �__-__-
-r/r5n
Jnmr'os
66p. 17-
Luxos
CORRECT zuN-----�'--'---'1o~*7oo~uzv~uz
---' --
"//rblj
3 m7,o5
^az.'r
wwas
cowr Ssnw
51~42m0~821~82
6*n.17 °
-' - - '-- --- - '-
---�--- ---- -----
-' - - --'- -- -
~r/rx/
13/! 7/,55
7 1.19
SexzrFa ,cPr
scev cnmrnAcro
10~*288-420-42 �
r,z
l3/'7/8 5
s9 5
pr,c
oCwonL
19~4202~421-42 '
. !It r`x
13 / -1/'p5
95 a
PrAc
MAmoeEmcmT
10~*2o2~421~42 '
v5."0
. "rIo4
J3/a7/85
69n.70
pm:
scmozL
10~*202-421-2o '
69r.7r) °
- _-- '�-------------
-------- ---'
- ' --' - �
, v/r,
155.11
CRAIG nw^uoow
x-_/peuosc°cwT
10~42"2-**0-46 '
Jz1z 8
,,nn.m~
monx aELIrIams uasn
cnxnccrzon
10~*2oo-140-14 '
�rrrt)o
,s.r/o5
_- 2.319.40
-- �LuanR REL4rzo]Svsoo -rnwr
sc]v -----
m~4znO-140~1�- '
'n/^u
.n.r,u5
v,nn.4o
L1nan *c��r�oms «xvo
--- --,n~�zco
cowr csex
v�o �� --- -
~ -
�
z,na.4o ^
,
7r,�r
----' ---------'---.'--__-__
�sv�r/us
ovm.�y
-___
acco��rr ��u���—������r��---`��on~����----
/�
- —' -
'
Tln.�n ^
'
- .
.31-71 m
-- '
67'
-- ----------------------`
rwxw
mcMBERsHIpo ---'---'--`�_������^n���--------'
-
«�.00 °
. .
-
"/r/�,v
1 3/jr,85 ' ----------67.7m
------�INOuSTRA'T-BmUSm
cLs«yzms SUPPLIES
--- ---- �
10-4512-440-44
or,ra °
,
_ '//nc
�s,cr'��
�o���n
_
��u�w 'c�"�-------------��xr-/--��
- --'
^.~ -"".'"
-as~^'o/--' -,------ �
/ u~o`^~o |
- -
' .
rr/rr�
�.
-1 31`7 '8 5
985 vn
a �wzwormm An n� �y
��w/n� o� pnop
' ------'--- �
�n-oznu~n�O~oo
vos,po °
^°^'cns
'////4 -
-
- u�
'
�
--------- - '
^
�
rs.ro
--� -HOWARD woRoxc*_-- __-SERVICES.
.�
10-4120-18+18
~
1985 CITY
OF {DINA
106.23
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK. NO.
DATE
— V' NOV ITEM DESCRIPTI
077775
'I
)3/07/95
5.98
HOWARD NORBACK MILEAGE
RONALD W 3AMUELSON
CONF B SCHOOLS
j3/ ^8/85 4
80.98 *
INTEINA;TIONAL CONF M
_. '!77776
;3/08/85
123.10
MR PA CONFEPENCE
15.00
NATIONAL R= GISTRY OF
REGISTRATION
777177
J3/ ^8/85
106.23
SUTPHEN CORP
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4540 - 540 -54
2 31 .41
^77778
J3/L'3/85
15.00
RONALD W 3AMUELSON
CONF B SCHOOLS
j3/ ^8/85 4
47.50 I
INTEINA;TIONAL CONF M
MANUALS 1
10- 4502 - 490 -49 I
077779
33/-8/85
15.00
NATIONAL R= GISTRY OF
REGISTRATION
36 :
:3/08/85 3
°Tl78U
]3/'9/85
CONSTRUCTION 1
IAFC
DUES
39121.50 •
_. '177181
)3/0,8185
11060
C.F *AVDERSON CO
CONT REPAIRS
- -- - - --
11.60
+
?T7781
)3/09/85
109.76
GENERAL BINDING CORP
GEN SUPPLIES
_; - - --
- ---
109.76
* --
77 *19 A
_. ^.77/33
03/08/85
251.45
CARBURETIDN TURBO
CONT REPAIRS
rI77 =4
73/ 8�R5
r77 7
/• CT7T
nl /7
,II
C7T 7
5
-- C717
10- 4208 - 184 -18
10 -4202- 600 -60
10 -4504- 560 -56
10- 4202 - 440 -44
10- 4202- 440 -44
10 -4204- 440 -44
10- 4248 - 440 -44
10- 4504- 600 -60
10- 4248 - 560 -56
03 -18 -85 PAGE 20
r
q P.O. p ME'iaABF
2
3
IJ
fl
�p
11
IR
IJ
1fl
Ip
I3�
3
Tb9_— 3.3/11185 100.'0 JOHN WELDING SERV CONT REPAIRS 40- 4248- 803 -80 ?1
10!1. ^0 *
- -- - 3/11/85 558.617 - - - - -- I'°
9r BA RR ENGINEERING CO SERIC_S 10 -4220- 260 -26
558.60
91 03/11/85 40130 KAR_V SOLIE REPAIR SERV 40- 4248 - 803 -80 a'
40.00 +
6R
92 ')3/11/85 145.)0 MN GOOD ROADS INC MEMBERSHIIP 10 -4204- 260 -26 _ —
145.30
]1
93 93/11/85 30 *10 STATE T.RE4SURER CERTIFICSATION FREE 40- 4310 - 809 -80
30.,0 •
231 *41 A
ACE MANUF R
REPAIR PARTS 1
10- 4540 - 540 -54
2 31 .41
/85 j
j3/ ^8/85 4
47.50 I
INTEINA;TIONAL CONF M
MANUALS 1
10- 4502 - 490 -49 I
1 +I
47.50 *
36 :
:3/08/85 3
3 *121.50 W
WEH.ZMAN C)4SULT ASSO C
CONSTRUCTION 1
10 -1455- 000 -00
39121.50 •
f f _
_
nfl
* * *•-CKS
77.19
7
REPAIR PARTS 1
10 -4540- 560 -56 -
-43
77 *19 A
,n
rj,- 11c JF EDIPJA
CHECK RL.,sT�-R
03-18-85 PAGE
21
C , H E-C K---L4lp_RAjjEL
AMOUNT
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO, INV. N P.Q. a M.ESSUF
71794
-
-93 /13 f 8 5
195.1
_
H=NN E.P_LR C D N ML_ BL
2
185.03
c7f 795
013/13/85
-- -----
159 . � 0
M A T S A 5ZMIUAR
10-4202-421-4
nl
7
150.00
W 7 706
3 1-
- ' -_75' 9
A) T �A ,jr N G
!J77797
33/13/B5
WM WAL SH
ry
_
-. REGISTRAT 9N
10-4202-421-42
2,100
077.758
... j3/13/85
--- ----
15 .39
.--..-RA-Qj3)-S-BAZJJ
..................
On 4 9 1. "-22--A2
15.19
n7l 799
3 /13/ Fk 5
-1 0-5-1-
1,14 CONT SERV
1 9550.33 •
L;7? 6') 0
3 /1- 3LR 5--
76.'0
------ RE_ -UN n
_i0- 31�D�IlDafl.G
"111
3778 ^1
73/13/85
-6.25
CT_LI!LR=R CITY INC CONY REPAIRS
-- l_0�5L48�60 -56
625.00
b 21 2
-_- _3/13/8_5 -_
! 0-39. 1
LA 8 S3-S - - --------- E
'DAT a RV
I 0.�-- 42.0 0��14 0.m-1-4-
I D 3 9 UP
"77 6L) 3
1
TRM FOLUR RENTAL
1.0- 4226 - 510 -51
9499.j2
7 7 8 0 4
3-t8-5
12 .-9 4-----EIBE
12.94 *
_IXS_T RACI Dp R Q a KR
4 4
U 7 7.8 Q-5.-.
03/13185
10.f7
S.LUAflJ-U-JOHNSON REFUND
40- 3525 5 ---D-Q.0 - 0 Ll
10.37 •
r,:77 8t)6
3113L5
0-I N r, POTIER CHECKS
-_10- 4.2.00
17
240.0 •
-- -646-64
71.,-.,_-778IJ7
FJ3/13/85
.145.00
JgRYS LA�DSCgpING CONY REPAIR
0- 4248 - 841 -84
I
145. "0
.
Io
�ff84s.--
5 O-m-"30,�B 6 2 8 6
154.FO
33_(1.31 PS
4 _4
ROrflrqTFR mTnLANr) rHFMTrAl-S
?A-4SA4-?n7-7,1
492.14
777813 _-
-,J 3 /1-3.1-8-5-
? 07
207,274.50
3/85
27.25
-LRI-STAY E REV INVENURY
SQ-46.32-862-RA
27.25
07781_2.--------
R- 3L23185
60.86
ENTEC INS INVFNTnRY StIPPLTFS
73-1209-0 Q-00
19x5 czrr
OF roIwu
10
cxEcm ncszorEn
-----
03~18~85
p*sc za
_CHECK NO.
'|
DATE
_-640UNT
,
FUNID
27
TOTdL
|'
1,939.29
6n ' n*
28
TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER FUND
5
.3 5-----
'---'--'
719665.67
FUND
50
'.
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 62560
59953.50
FUND
60
TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION FUND'
. '�/�x��-___
. '
�3/13/85
--'_
PACE _-~
.~~. .^..
-.--...-...-..
..
`
.,|
390 ,
�.. |
' 971815 '---�3/13
/ 8 5------------707.17-------EXECUTTDE-REpnors
ouascazprzum
10-4608-200-20
`i
107.17
P-77616
03/13/F5
55.00
STATE OF 4N
LICENSE RENEWAL
10-4310-560-56
,77816
os/no/u�
25.90
srm7r OF yw
Lzccmoc RENEWAL
10~*310~646~64
[
| rrrma_
3/13/3 55?*T
10-4310~8
r
(117616
.J
znns/uo
—
--sr^rE OF 41
CORRECTION ----'--------,o-4o1V-oo
---------�--
^
/ `rro,o
J3w3/n5
60.10
STATE OF Mv
LzCcmsc ncmcwAL
40~*310~800~80
1
L3778 17
onmn/o5
7 .13
xxwo rcmmAL pnuo
comwoozTzso
23~4500~610~*1
|'1
/
cxs /
'
~~~'^~
~^°^
°"^","`"
��w ""r,����
w�~�u^~~°w~^*
�
~`
6.43
�r�rn- ---�jx�����----------
--����-------�---------
�����z*Z~��
-----------' i
15°10
---
[--
^^^-cwo
|^|
---------
i
�
/
'
.��
'
j
[4-----------
FU4D
10
iJ
`—�
-----
267,3U7.77
FU4D
10
TOTAL
GENERAL FUND |
15,05.98
FUNID
27
TOTdL
GOLF COURSE FUND
1,939.29
FUND
28
TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER FUND
719665.67
FUND
50
TOTAL
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 62560
59953.50
FUND
60
TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION FUND'
3759959.47,
TOTAL
_ �..
U-1
�
/.-o�
�
�
1»n5- CIT-Y-OFEDINA
CHECK REGISTER
03-0,4-85
xsc v
'
-
�
c*ccx NO.
oArc
*Moowr
vswon�
Ircn ocscozprzom
xccnunT wo° zmx" o p.o° v
ncssxoc
--�2i ?6i9 5---'--
--77 .21- --
-i
77.20
^ °
' |
�------------
------------------------�
'---'----'----�°°-cxa--/��
^^°~°°---�-
_
-
/.
C, 6 30:3
27 o_5
62.--4
^��� u
/n pmnro
�o~454V~sau~s6
''
oz~)4-----------
� �'-
-�x- _���,rw-o - - 's-p-L-Y - ----nc-p-x-
---- -
-
— �
**°- c
`~
063uve
uzv27'o5
n*.vn
Aurm*oezLc Scmxzcc c
nmvr ncpuzns
1o~4248~56D~56
763ol 2
-2/27/o5
z^.vs
xuronoozLc o�sxzcc c
comr ocpxzpo
1o~*z4a~nou~�a
|'|`
*p."U �--
---'- - -----'--'--
' --------�----�
----
�
~uoun
^mz,e�
zn.vz
��mcnmxrox ncauz�o
ssx ouppuc�
vo~*nn�-sov~�o
_�-_-
oano`s
2i 2778S---------
-------A
L/ckVA-7OT- n E 8U101------ CV-sUpp[]E
nT-4-5p4--'560~5a------''--'-----
--�
_
om'-' 1 3
z/ 27 ,8 5
38.55
«LrcxwxroI REBUILD
nE:pmn Pxx7o
,o~*s*o-suo~o^
o*3ul 3
71 .48
ALrcomX7oR xsauILo
puars
�o~**zo~s6O~so
nax-/ 3
_�2/27m5
^2/2riR 5-
- +o�.»a --------xir��^rCT�A��o�
�
zw.rs °
~
-'
`
- - -- ---------------
-
_________ ------"^°=cKS-
!`�
-D o3 �j zo
2 m o5
1�053.03
oxnmrn mcrcm z�c
;mocmroRr
^u~vzao~uuo~oo
�.
C63-26
� ?ay�5-' ----'----1.1vS.5s-----
Auosc�-MEy;7n--Imo------T-wxE-
mroor-----------'-'-*n.;lzao-;-Gno~oo----
�
"^
cox ' m
2 /26 /8 5
vz,' .xo
sAno"' n ncrEx zwC
sEp^/n p^xrs
40~4540-803~80
0
,63-26
02/27185
677.73
B«oncn wcrsn INC
REPAIR PARTS
*01-4 5 4o-80 7~8�
re3j26 ---0
--------��C���-N�r�g-��
-K-p A RTS
4U;---W40�89 ���n--------- -
------''
^�
"��.�u
uav�rvo�
or rn~
^
a�nocn wc/cn INC
cuno�crznw
*n~*5*V ~ our~ mo
N
---_---__--_--___--_-._-_3,047.1
7_�_---__�_---_________
cxs
- 663 0 5------�27����
w
"63 s5
o2 /26 19 5
*os.nn
Bnuur780 cLco o nps
comr ncpxzns
40~*2*8-8o`~80
'
`
063c35
2 126 9 5
418.20
unoarsWo cLco o mpa
cnur acpxInu
*0~4 2 48~8x1~8n
r63u35
_L
.2��vm
ac.�a----�—�v0�r��l��IcC-&-Kr
G CONT REFWIRS
4n--80 5~8 3------
^= |
923.52 °
^
~
~~^^^~
-----------
---�^°=c
-- o3c43
2/27/"5
oz.5o
42.50
o SEAT n
cow7 ocpxIns
10~42*8~560-56
'-
�1
--------�----
-
%W
�
^^^-cno
o^xo^a 2126m5 a*.as eLmnoEns **nrn nZpxzn pxnrs 10~4540~646~64
��
u4"2s ° ''
oo3V5*'-�---T2/27r185
*n°oo °
w
cxa
4
19F czn OF r7ozmA
- ' cH,7cv wn. o�rc ^~oowT
a2/26/95 181 .72
caoa1 -zmy/nn 65.70
-- - ---'----- --z'47-. 42
c*ccx ncmzorsn
_
wcwonI rTcm osscmzp7znw
cIry OF c31n^ wmEn
CITY OF EIINA WATER
_
ny~o4~x5 pxnc a '
x:couwT NOe zwx . w P.Oe w wcSaxGc '
.^�
------- ------ !
ln~4258~446~44 �
10~4258~6*6~64 |.!
�
cxs '.
�
�6311 4 �212718 5 3
.. 5..10 . oT- Lcsxmn `ooL co rnoLs 10~4580~301~30
} .
r�a��* �a�ar�es--- --�no.«0- ---sxa� F-uuo�n�cm------szowo'o puu�o---------10-o54z-sas-3n -
C631 3o z/ 2r/o5 169 .00 c«nL p AwncnsEm pxxrs 10~4620-5*0~56
*pu.�o ^
C6 31 5 -1 '-,z/zu,ns 15.56 cLT-crnomz: ccnrca - ' ncpxzn PARTS - ----- 10~*5*0~322~3,-
-- 1
^°^-cxn � '~
'
!
xs ! -
~ | -v31 5 j
z/zo 5
3 n.39
cLccrnumzc ucmrcx
nsP^rn pxnrn
10~*540~560~56
|`
45.95 °
|` -
.
�.
.
°^-cns �
c*3 1/
//ar?us ' -
11,773.25 ---
- n.L.CaWn^crzwo zwc
- comrncPxznx--''---'---'40=*2*8680
3~8 0 -----
.`
- !
`
10,773.25
'^^^-cns--,i
n6sv»,
�z/zu/oo
16.50
rswcmAL n"nxro
acm uuppLJzcs
10-450*-622-62
�
- --
- - 16 .5 o �--
- -' ---'---' -----'
- ---------------------'-----'--------
--
^^°-cna |/
� camsu
�z/zwm�
�p.un
ne«xeun c�curn�c CO
ncpxz� p^xro
,o-an�o~oon~uo
/ w
- 0631 88
12/26'85
15.03
opxxaxx cLccrnzc co
ncpAIa p«nTa
13~2010-000~01
co��o"
~��za/p� --'
- ��a.on---
-- sv^vau�-�cccrx�c-zo----m�m
soppczcs----------�O~*�r*~naZ~no
1
.
� ] 0631 �s
2v2*r65
,o ~ ro
G=*vo*n sLccrnzo CO
scw sappLzco
,o ~ 45 0 4~540-5 4
�.
L
C631 68
^2/26/e5
18316
mn^re*n sLcxrazc co
ncrxzn PARTS
1045 40~540~5 4
06316 9
----���2a7S3-----
nnuvo-kxrcaC
nnR-PWnr
10=*5*0-5*0-:4--------
-- ---' �
"~ caxvax
jzxaavps
*z.no
op^xaxn cLccrxI'c CO
ncpAzn pxnrm
10~*540-5*0~54
�
' n6n`o"
�a�z*'�s
�r�.�o
sn�vu�n c�ccvnzc co
nspuzn p^nro
�o~*s�o~s*o~s*
2631 6a
--�~o/267V �---
44.55 - --snxvoAn'Ec-Ecrnzc-ca--
—'ncpxIn - pu
10-;---*5 *0^6 *7~6 4--'--
l
� 0001w
�
n6 3194
~. |
�
~ r+nv«
It-
" "
Dz/uo/mo 11 .00 ncmcaxL oowwo^ucxrmu x*ozn scnxzcs 10~4294~**0~44
�2v2��o�---------��r7s°n� -----'�EN�a�I-t3mwuwlCArws----�44oIo-[ouIP-----------1o�*p14~44o�4*-
1 ,coa.on °
nS'-
n 1
�2 /2 718 5 ?6 .18 G r "Amro Rcp*Tn pAnrs ,n~�s��-sao~5a
' - ' - ' - '
�
-1- ''
~J
'
�.
'
�.
�.
°
/
� !
�
~^
~
~
~
~`~ ^~'m ^ `~'^- L ^ n^'-.In* LxrS^uE o 10~4 206~480~*8 ---------�- -- -
p632u3 �12v27185 2.51 KATHY n^nzELL MEETING cxpcmoco 10-4 206-60 0-60
n632 'm2r/s 22.510 nATo, x^nocLL mccrI�s cxpcNscs 10~4206~*27~62 L-
r+zzv� 'zor/m5 ------- 22.50~-- K'rxrnA")7LL ---' ----CUAnEcrI'M ---'--'13~4206~627-62
0632u3 -zmr/,s 2.25 KATHY KxnJ--LL MEETING cxpcxocs vo~4206-627~62
rozUs u/27/85 14.40 xorov mnn07LL MzLcAoc 10-4208-160-16
c6 3 2 C1 --��zi2y�u5---
'632u3 j2r27105 13.413 KATHY n^PoTLL sI:m suppLzcn 10~450'~62-62 !`
eoun Jz/ar/°� 7.31 nIrHv KonIcLL pzLw uuppLzcs 1n~450-~*z'~4a
~�xz,
3 2127 /95 '--- ---- 7.92 - xA THY- ��»ocLL --------- -rz[M'SUP*l2��----------10-4so~-4o'~�x
76.33 ° - '
' -'- �----'-----
0 6 3 2�5 �3 _ _����[�n�_ 3 5,n0 _ ooypxacv RAomro* r:wr ncPxIos
o632e u2v27^95
om/^p �2/27/?5
------
265.15
na.pn
vu~4a4o~suu~su
---_'-_- /
cxS'-
|1
'.w
cxs L.
Ir^sCx cnJzp CO ncpAzR pxp7o 10~45*0~560~56
zroac^ coJzp co ncpxIn pAoro 10-4540-560-56 | �
-------- -'------------
cxs ^°^~ []
�
763283 ^2126v8 5 19452.63 Jowco cncMzc«Ls INC auwrca uoppLzsu 4n~*aa2~au�~uV
1,452.63
^
---___ . /
cxo |
|_
r�5 2 / 2 7' - - '__- _-----_--_ -_-'--l2 -q. uK-R 1 -S- R DM I -Y -- -_ '~-- zan�- 510 -�5 1 c63292 L2v27re5 1,172 o *»nxos wnoLrcn co wnux - -caO~saO~na
23,949.00 ------ ------------||�^
|
^°^-cwo []^
C63 -1*----- U NOX l[OM§�R-C [ �oo�oo��oo--------------- --- `'�
C63 3- c2/26m5 sr.vo wwux Lomacn co LUMBER , '~--60*~6*6~64
----''---
aJj3ir
06331 °"" ,""^UC m acm sopp�zcs 25-�o
^ o��or u2'oxw5 355°05 L^wsnm peooucrx scw uuppLzco 1- �--' -za~su
e
�z/ �
�,�un Lxms�w pnnoucrs scw �oPp�zco �n~�4a-a*
59 7 ,� ___ ,
^°°'cxo '
m
-_--_---_-___--_-�-�
�1�
~ 1vus-CI.TI-O[-�y) I
INA-______-_______�__ _
____ x
xcazorcn 0
03~04~85 pooc o
�
uArc u
u~nuw- x
xEmnnp I
Ircw ocScnrprmm x
xccoumr mu° zmx° o
-----_�-
/3|
~ �+3 '
'2/26/85 1
17 e.`z �
�7sncRAL u,rzc� pxoo o
oprzcc punmzronc 1
10~13 30-000~0 0
0632 `- ^^°^ ° o
oc/or/u» /
/.cx ^ u
uAraroA000cL P
POSTAGE ^
^^^~cxs /
9632 `3 u
---- -
---- 1
- mur^r-kx*b'::L[ ------- �
�ccrzio-Ex0 tws�o--- ,
10 4290 140 14 /
/
~' cux/-)n 2
27 /27ru5 5
5.o0 K
KATHY x^=oKL w
wscrIws cnpcmycS 1
10~42r6~e10~20
r°3^1 ` �
�2127185 1
1.19
xcxxcs 1
10~420*-260~26
« x
0632L, 3 -
~J
'
�.
'
�.
�.
°
/
� !
�
~^
~
~
~
~`~ ^~'m ^ `~'^- L ^ n^'-.In* LxrS^uE o 10~4 206~480~*8 ---------�- -- -
p632u3 �12v27185 2.51 KATHY n^nzELL MEETING cxpcmoco 10-4 206-60 0-60
n632 'm2r/s 22.510 nATo, x^nocLL mccrI�s cxpcNscs 10~4206~*27~62 L-
r+zzv� 'zor/m5 ------- 22.50~-- K'rxrnA")7LL ---' ----CUAnEcrI'M ---'--'13~4206~627-62
0632u3 -zmr/,s 2.25 KATHY KxnJ--LL MEETING cxpcxocs vo~4206-627~62
rozUs u/27/85 14.40 xorov mnn07LL MzLcAoc 10-4208-160-16
c6 3 2 C1 --��zi2y�u5---
'632u3 j2r27105 13.413 KATHY n^PoTLL sI:m suppLzcn 10~450'~62-62 !`
eoun Jz/ar/°� 7.31 nIrHv KonIcLL pzLw uuppLzcs 1n~450-~*z'~4a
~�xz,
3 2127 /95 '--- ---- 7.92 - xA THY- ��»ocLL --------- -rz[M'SUP*l2��----------10-4so~-4o'~�x
76.33 ° - '
' -'- �----'-----
0 6 3 2�5 �3 _ _����[�n�_ 3 5,n0 _ ooypxacv RAomro* r:wr ncPxIos
o632e u2v27^95
om/^p �2/27/?5
------
265.15
na.pn
vu~4a4o~suu~su
---_'-_- /
cxS'-
|1
'.w
cxs L.
Ir^sCx cnJzp CO ncpAzR pxp7o 10~45*0~560~56
zroac^ coJzp co ncpxIn pAoro 10-4540-560-56 | �
-------- -'------------
cxs ^°^~ []
�
763283 ^2126v8 5 19452.63 Jowco cncMzc«Ls INC auwrca uoppLzsu 4n~*aa2~au�~uV
1,452.63
^
---___ . /
cxo |
|_
r�5 2 / 2 7' - - '__- _-----_--_ -_-'--l2 -q. uK-R 1 -S- R DM I -Y -- -_ '~-- zan�- 510 -�5 1 c63292 L2v27re5 1,172 o *»nxos wnoLrcn co wnux - -caO~saO~na
23,949.00 ------ ------------||�^
|
^°^-cwo []^
C63 -1*----- U NOX l[OM§�R-C [ �oo�oo��oo--------------- --- `'�
C63 3- c2/26m5 sr.vo wwux Lomacn co LUMBER , '~--60*~6*6~64
----''---
aJj3ir
06331 °"" ,""^UC m acm sopp�zcs 25-�o
^ o��or u2'oxw5 355°05 L^wsnm peooucrx scw uuppLzco 1- �--' -za~su
e
�z/ �
�,�un Lxms�w pnnoucrs scw �oPp�zco �n~�4a-a*
59 7 ,� ___ ,
^°°'cxo '
m
-_--_---_-___--_-�-�
�1�
' -'- �----'-----
0 6 3 2�5 �3 _ _����[�n�_ 3 5,n0 _ ooypxacv RAomro* r:wr ncPxIos
o632e u2v27^95
om/^p �2/27/?5
------
265.15
na.pn
vu~4a4o~suu~su
---_'-_- /
cxS'-
|1
'.w
cxs L.
Ir^sCx cnJzp CO ncpAzR pxp7o 10~45*0~560~56
zroac^ coJzp co ncpxIn pAoro 10-4540-560-56 | �
-------- -'------------
cxs ^°^~ []
�
763283 ^2126v8 5 19452.63 Jowco cncMzc«Ls INC auwrca uoppLzsu 4n~*aa2~au�~uV
1,452.63
^
---___ . /
cxo |
|_
r�5 2 / 2 7' - - '__- _-----_--_ -_-'--l2 -q. uK-R 1 -S- R DM I -Y -- -_ '~-- zan�- 510 -�5 1 c63292 L2v27re5 1,172 o *»nxos wnoLrcn co wnux - -caO~saO~na
23,949.00 ------ ------------||�^
|
^°^-cwo []^
C63 -1*----- U NOX l[OM§�R-C [ �oo�oo��oo--------------- --- `'�
C63 3- c2/26m5 sr.vo wwux Lomacn co LUMBER , '~--60*~6*6~64
----''---
aJj3ir
06331 °"" ,""^UC m acm sopp�zcs 25-�o
^ o��or u2'oxw5 355°05 L^wsnm peooucrx scw uuppLzco 1- �--' -za~su
e
�z/ �
�,�un Lxms�w pnnoucrs scw �oPp�zco �n~�4a-a*
59 7 ,� ___ ,
^°°'cxo '
m
-_--_---_-___--_-�-�
�1�
----''---
aJj3ir
06331 °"" ,""^UC m acm sopp�zcs 25-�o
^ o��or u2'oxw5 355°05 L^wsnm peooucrx scw uuppLzco 1- �--' -za~su
e
�z/ �
�,�un Lxms�w pnnoucrs scw �oPp�zco �n~�4a-a*
59 7 ,� ___ ,
^°°'cxo '
m
-_--_---_-___--_-�-�
�1�
19F5 CITY
OF EOINA
CHECK REGTST_R
03 -04 -85 PAGE 4
CHECK N7.
DATE
AMOUNT
V74D02
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. 4 MESSAGE-
•rt r • r
++ ►'°CKS
063329 --
- --2/26785 - --
- 1:437.TO
-- ___ LAYN_- MTN7_-50TA- rO------
-CZNT- REP -kTR
•I
19430.JO
•
j
f #t.•.
- - - - -..
—. - --
- --`- -- - ---
- _ __ trf -CKS
U63331
2/27/85
396.94
LAHASS CORPORATION
CONT REPAIRS
10 -4248- 560 -56
063331
X2127735 - - --
- 67;27_
-`"— LANASS�II {DORaTIDN - -
-- REPAZTi AFITS
Q= 4540 = 560 =5b
-- -- -- - -
-
464.11
•
,.I
- - -- --
- - - - - — --- ---- - --
- - -- - --- - - - --
• r • -CKS
I
_ C63342
X2/27/85
111.52
MAC OU =EN _QUIP INC
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
^63342 " "-
= 2 %27/85 --
119;28
MSC-- OU`ElEN- _OU!P- I NC—
`P"PAIR -PARTS
17=4540- 560 -56"
-- -- -- ---
^63342
X2/27/85
196.47
MAC QUEIEN EQUIP INC
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
_
063342
.2/27185
97. 92
MAC QUEIEN EQUIP INC
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
- -
524.G9
:- - - - - - -- -- - -
rrf •aa
CKS
.�
063344
u2/26/85
33.75
MED OXYGE4 8 EQUIP
CANT REPAIRS
10 -4248- 440 -44
33.75
+
f f f #
.
ftf -CKS
1
063 355--- --
�2/ 27785------
5.3B---
M ?UVi�TA�3E4A7'aG -C�
d= "4540= 560- 56 - - --
- - -- -- - --
REPAIR- PISRTS
r 063355
'22127/F5
122.65
MINNSOTA REARING CO
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
- 129.03
y fffra•
+ +• -CKS
06336±' - -_ --
- -�212b%85
12:5j
- MIN�lEnTA- fJAIVN7R—
CDIVT-REP -AIRS
- tt* =2 ^10= 000 -0�-
-- _. -- -•- - _....-
0633o
= 2/26/85
21. -,0
MINNESOTA WANNER
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 322 -30
U633oi.
.:2/26/85
68.50
MINNESOTA WANNER
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
- - -
-- -- 02 .1 7
. - - - -- - — --- - - -- --
-- - - - -- -
- rff ff f
* *• -CKS
063385
j?/27185
120.''0
MCGUIRE ROBERT
TREE INSPECION
10- 4242 - 353 -30
x63355
X2/27/85
360.00
MCGUIRE) ROBERT
TREE TRIMMING
60 -1300- 012 -18
- _-
_
- 490:30
- - -- - -- --
y
1
f # r r # t
- - - - --
- ---
-- - - - -rtt -CKS
-
`
., 063403
..2/26185
9973
N W SOUND
REPAIR PARTS
28- 4540- 708 -70
'IIL-
9.78
•
- - -- -. -_.-
- - --
I
�,
rrrtrr
I
• rt -CKS
7
V
- _
C6 -1434
- �-TTZb7 -8
-69 16
FRINT_ i SLRVI"C-ETNC
T_-9n P MAIRT
28-4-Z74-707--70- r
----- - - - - --
..
160.16
•
-:1
- - - --- -- --- - -- 999_9_____
- - --- - - --
_ ._ r t +- CKS
. .
e.
�
�
~
�
�
�
°
�
�
~
=
�
.,
�
�
°
198* CITY
OFsDINA
34.40
CHECK REGISTER
03~04~85 pusc s -
c*Ecx mo.
DATE
^Moowr
v:-'won!Z zrcn osocxzprzom
xccm/mT NO* z.»"�...o. o .E-S'-'--
�)
063446
-,2/27/35
�'rrvp..x^v
sn "zx wocc� ecp�zp Pxn`x
[�
10-45*0-560~56
----
--'---------
m °
----� - ------'
'--'----- --------
-----------'---- - — --- -' - !�
C63447
02m7m5
V.ns
pcmm xvrn pLxox cow7 xcpAIxs
-
10~4248~560~56
-- - If- 92 -----
nu�rm-n�px' PATrEnv------REPAIR-Pxnro----------'
_---
un.�s °
_ _
.
- -'-_
|^ �
, 01) 3 5r 3
^21m/n5
32.76
sueu*Rxw
^°^-cnS
oop
a7p^!n
pxo`s
*0-2010-000-00
- --
34.40
--*"°-cno
w n6 3 5o3
gz^2orm
,zr.pa
-''�.�a
uo?yRomx
^^^-cxx
/
r63452
L�z/27/8!
21 .'4
ouzcm acRv o^rrsn,
ecpxIn p^Rrs
10-4540-560-56
�zr�6/�
� �-
c63452
�2 /zrv8 ------
-- - If- 92 -----
nu�rm-n�px' PATrEnv------REPAIR-Pxnro----------'
10�-*5*0-5*0~56-----
, 01) 3 5r 3
^21m/n5
32.76
sueu*Rxw
"LuMo
oop
a7p^!n
pxo`s
*0-2010-000-00
|
_ob 3 5 z 3u2/26/
o
^^^-cxs
c^3 4'--, 4_
__��������
_____. � r6.1 4
vo cnz�nm o�xxscuw
rc�zp*`
omc
vo~*z5a~s1o~s
i'^~
176.1 *'°-------
--------------------___.
- - - ---
_ ___-
- ___--- ' _--
--' ---- ----
----__ -_
^^^-cxs
.'
.-.
"63491
32/26/x5
1,.10
sr»AosnxNI *«aowxnE
nspxzm pxnrs
�o-zo�o-onO~co
m
17.10
3^3492
u2/27m5
24.80
000r*o*Lc FORD
n�pAzx pxnro
10~4540~560~56
| �/
rampz
�z�ar/n�
245.73-
unormn*�c =000
cncnzr
10~4540-560~56
u634 Q2
^z/2r7u5----------
-
-
4
P63 49z
^2/27/v;
15»
snur*nALc rnxn
REPAIR pApru
10~*540-560~56
^
c6349�
rz/zr/x:
24.14
oour*vnLc pnao
xEpAra pAx/u
10-4540-5*0~56
� |�
c63492
ze-0x'n7 5
lg--4540;---560-;56--
063492
.2/27/85
20- e.3 4
yoor*oA;Lc rnnu
ccpuIe pxnTs
10-*5 40-560~5 6
/
r63492
-L.2/27/95
19.43
snurynxLc pono
nAnrs
vu~*s*n~x*o~»o
~
oa»4 92
^z/2r'15 5
37.6v-
xthr-HbvLC'-Fono-'--------*EpzzTlru-IT7
0-;-45 40'L-5 60�5 6-------
,63492
^z/27/e5
sr.zo
snorHnA;Lc poxo
pAnra
10-4620-560~56
*n4,v^ °
~
^^^-onu
o63498
--u2/26/?5-----'-
-' 23�3�-------arwx-�cc���anvz��-----��p�z�-P�nY�-----------v��4s*O�nzO�sa---'-
zy.Dn ^
*
- --
--*"°-cno
w n6 3 5o3
gz^2orm
,zr.pa
-''�.�a
uo?yRomx
"Luwo
oop
ncpAzn
pxn7x
,o~anvo-oon~oo
| ou��,�
�zr�6/�
------�uau1���-siu��
SUP -----'-R-PATR-PAnTn
c--;4540~540-54----
, 01) 3 5r 3
^21m/n5
22.76
sueu*Rxw
"LuMo
oop
a7p^!n
pxo`s
*0-2010-000-00
|
_ob 3 5 z 3u2/26/
o
.~~.~-
~
*'
` °
m
^-' oxo ��
-�
1p c535L5
L 2 v26 /8 5
54 .15
ouw
xoxcnrsoInm
10~*210-140-14
'--
-
-
4
^
19x5 rzr,
or soINA_________
CHECK REGISTER
oo~o4~u5
pxmc *
-
~ |
cx_c° mo ^
nArc
Anmo:r
xEmno1
Irc* DESCRIPTION
^ccnuwr NO. zwx. x P.O. o
mcss«oc
54.15 °
-- -
---------'-----------------
- -
*
.*°,cxn
�
oussuo
c2126r8 5
15.76
sr PAUL 000x
scw ooppLzcn
10~*504~420~42
'w
o5o1�p
_�o~o5
m
11 .36
nr ptoL nnnm
ocw ooppLIco`
10~*5 04-*2 0~*2
|^|
3:�"
�2 /2^/? 5-- -
- 41 .72
S PAUL noox -
-Gov soppLIss --'-'------10~4504-44o-44
.
=
0+35,�
2u/"5
2.25
Sr PAUL eoow
nprzcc soppucn
10~*516~510-5 1
' L
06 3 5ux
jmzo1n5
».�n
ar p^oc ouox
opr�c� supp��co
a�~o�va~oao~66
- ''-----''
'---- '° - --
r3.*z
— ----- --------
------__----
- _
1
°^°~cxs
'
�
r6 3 51 1
omzr/"5
54.05
oouroc»u v�;coom ocPx
p»pcn ouppczco
50~*514~82 2~8 2
'
54.95 ^
'
°^°-cws
-
l!)sm o
72 /ur o5-- -
- vv.�7
SEE oma nocnucw -- -
acw'-oopnLTcn----------
10~4504~325~30
�
`r
--
°°^-Cns
.
=,
q63525
02/26/85
2 3 .10
s n CO
uzomo m pnoro
.
1n~an1n~uoO~aO
-----'
231 .77 °
- '-- - --' '--
'---'--'--' ---------------
--
cns
�
I'S ox1
jzvarm5
zzz.)o
rcxows CORP
scw ouppLzcS
10-450*-301-30
. '
°^^-cvs
� w
Cl:)ox4x
�
221 :50
�
°^°-cns
'
0635148
---
�zvuu�xn
ss.co
7*� pnzmr s*op
pn�wrzms
zo~*ooV~a�o~o�
^
n�Co'
-----
---'�
|
�
°^^-cKs
r
`~ ]
cu3 5 5�
02/27vn5
76 .59
~
rzno"� ommoxno
-
n�p^�n pxnTn
vn~*x*n-s«o~nu
[
- -----
ru »� °
~
'
i
� .
cwn
/-
.
1:63 55 9
�zxzumS- --- '
-- 'a4.cn ----
-GEmsm-X[-PARTS ----'---Rcp-Azn--PnnTy
10-45 40-520-5 2---- -
'|
^~
|
24.on °
'
z
oo n r 3 � _
czm6xon
96.12
onsn
scm uoppLzso
1D~mo4~naO~sa
/]~
r���/�
-�mz6)��-------'---'zp'.3
a------'Vnus------
- '----
'-ncm ooppLzco ----------aa^z��o^noo-oo----
---
--'
',
~
�
�
�
-
*
�
�.
�
=�
�
~
19»5 CITY
OF E»INL
CO
CHECK _REGISTER
03-04-85
pxnc r
' --_.--_�,
'
cHccx n17.
oArc
^:ouur
xcmon
ITEM ucscnzprzom
wocoumr mo. INV. w P.O. o
mcsaxsE
r|
//�
r+3xr,
�zmu'Q 5
- ' w».z� '-----�o��---'
- -
---' --6EW-�0PpL!
50�*so4~maO~o6—
'-' -----
��'
o-,o5/
m2o/ss
149.23
xnus
ocw supPocx
50-4 50 4-86 1-86
au31 �'2
� !
r5 3 5/3
EhV_roNrKo
°4v.2n~
voss
conncc7zo�
sn-�no4-ou1-na
4v.26
|�
..
__,2/26/35______
'------ 4a'�----�-
��`
-'------
------
�-----------� --- --
^
^^^-cxs
r�su»
um2r/v5
415 .1 �3
wurrl p"ouco
ncp,Ie pxxro
40-45*0-803-80
m
C5 3us
rz/2rm �
vap.�s
� Arcn ppo�ucrs
ps"Azn pxnm
�o-�»�n~x�~ua
s
i
--
'-- ----�-------
---1�»or°4s �------'-----'
-'--�
- ------------------------�----------
----------�-
-
� `
`
16 35/8
2127 /55
21.19
wy.x.ezcoLEn co
INC nspAzR pAnro
10-4540-560-56
76:5 m
c2/2,�/F5
sx.vr
u°.w.z-1co�.sn co
INC ncpxIn p«ero
10~4540~560~56
_
5*.19-*-------'------
--
-----------------'
------------'--------------
' -
-
'.
^°^-cxs
'
cyosu^
=,vz, o5
rv~rs
u w snxzwIcx
roncm
10~4580~301-30
79. 73
--��
^^^-cns
o63^i3
--��/a����-----------���.��
----
nc-Nc4[Js 3rs,�-----�
-
--punr�---'--------------
. o�*�zo�sun-sa-
./
16361 3
u2/27m5
7x.e5
ncwEzLus STEEL
pEpxIa pxnrx
*0~4540-803~80
�ro.ro
^°^~cx3
w
non/.J
21 /o5'----------
CO
�
--' -
~
n63o4
u?o6/85
~~ ]
'- '-
w
ro�m�
�-Jzx���
y,29
� !
`
�---��u$�
vV�sr-'---- -----'-- -�`
|
- --
c*nm/
o1.2s
*~ !
'-' -----
'------
�
roo/no
J2/26/x5
au31 �'2
?zrau'o
ao' 43 ------hATi-T
EhV_roNrKo
S"AzR-*A R rs-
r.1 IO--;ono oo-----
/ o�o,az
.zvz��e�
4v.26
wArL ro*p cnmrnuL
nspxIn Pxero
50-4540-821-82
~~
r�,�9
.-
130.05
n*orro
32v26/85
�
--' -
.�
n63o4
u?o6/85
~~ ]
'- '-
-----------
'
~~ '
91637o5
n2y26m5
� !
`
c631j6
u2/26,x5
|
- --
c*nm/
uzvau/uo
*~ !
'-' -----
'------
�
roo/no
J2/26/x5
130.05
nEmsmL cLccrxIc
13005�^�
MzLLEnncnxo
1 9014. co ^
11.60
xTnzwm cLEcrnzc npLv
11.60 ^
19275.`5
oExw cmwnmwrznc
,.2rs./5 °
ra"oO
wonr* cnuvry pLxos
76.00 °
__--------__-
133.31
-_'.-_-___-_'
c~Z s*xpp
ncp«zn Pxnrm
mcm suppLIcn
ucpmn pxnrs
o«mcc zma7Roc7zom
mcm uuppL%cs
acm moppLzcs
-'- --__-''
/
,o~aovo~noo~on
'
13~2010~000~00 -
-_-__'--- _..4
10~4540-6*7-64
.�.'`
10~2240~000~00 '^
�
10~4504~520~52 | w
28~*50*~708~70
w
19n5 CITY o
or co�m� c
c*ccx ncazs/cn
06311 5 _u2/26185 3,86P. 10 xcmm cpm cuum/Y numw u aoAno
s 8 ,o�-----------------------
06371 _32/26»n5 n4^90 uocnzrpo n�pr aouw m eoxnn
34.90 °- - ----'- -- '--------------------
/ o*3/1-1.__ __j2/26/85 59.53 wpx IwnuorncIco coozp oxI:r
�����--- ---sv�so-�----------------
°
o*nnx j2v26185 ao.no rznc m�nsxx�u ASSOC rzoc pncxcmrzow
a,.or �-- -- ------ - ------------------------
063/,9 .2/24185 75.00 snpwEm n7xx�c comr acp�znn
���-----rs�zn�r-----
�
C63 721 _u212718!-___�_ _ vvs.xo /co Imxcmzomv ouppLzco
193 .32 4-- ---'------------'-'---------------
`
-'| caorz1 azvur�xs �ur.nn IwrcRm METAL orxIp pxxro
-------- nr .nn
casrzz _ __02/2-7v8-5______ _xv.on mnnrosmm xvomxuLzcs mg"AIn pAxra
39.39 ° --' ---'-- --'-'--'--'- -- ---'----- --'
�. .
,
063 12 3 uav�nxn� �oz.on NULLS cxpnu scm ouppLzco
^ -------------- O
~
,
063 f24 _j2/27/8561 .n2 xw sEmxxcs orxrzum ncpxrxPxxru
u1, 8a �----------''--'---'---------'
i.
-- r�srax -- 32/27,/85 lu�.00 uo*No wcLnzms scnv cow7 RE-PAIRS
~'!
_o*x/zo 02/27x85 17.50 xu7V suumz comT ncpAImo
�
os~u4~un p�sc u
--'
xccnum7 mo° Imx° w p.o° w mcSaxn-
}
10~*538~318~30
--------'----
_
|�
|°
-
i
/
.'�
!
'
.-
^w
----_' - |'
['
.w
/
/
|m
|
`j
- `
-'
.�
]
�
!
/-.
�)
10~**04~520~52
10~4802-280-28
1u~*»,o~4*0~4*
40~4310-801~80
,n~4an4~400~*6
1V~4aw*~zzo~za
�
10~*274-421-*2
vn~4aso~��o~��
10~42*8~520~52
ao~vcop~nnV~ou
10~*620~560~56
vn~4s4n~5*o~s6
_
*o~*sc^~mov~no
10~4 5 *0~540~5 4
-------'
40~42*8~803~80
10~4248~560~56
~.
~�
�
�
�
os~u4~un p�sc u
--'
xccnum7 mo° Imx° w p.o° w mcSaxn-
}
10~*538~318~30
--------'----
_
|�
|°
-
i
/
.'�
!
'
.-
^w
----_' - |'
['
.w
/
/
|m
|
`j
- `
-'
.�
]
�
!
/-.
�)
10~**04~520~52
10~4802-280-28
1u~*»,o~4*0~4*
40~4310-801~80
,n~4an4~400~*6
1V~4aw*~zzo~za
�
10~*274-421-*2
vn~4aso~��o~��
10~42*8~520~52
ao~vcop~nnV~ou
10~*620~560~56
vn~4s4n~5*o~s6
_
*o~*sc^~mov~no
10~4 5 *0~540~5 4
-------'
40~42*8~803~80
10~4248~560~56
~.
~�
�
�
-
^~
- 1985 CITY
UF rnlNA�--_--___'_--__-_
-_---_
-_-___--_.'C-H.ECK_REGIS
Igl_-
03-04-85
PAGE 9-
�|
c*Ecn NO.
oxrc
-- - '--
xmoowr
- ' - -
vcmou=
zrsm ocscnzprIom
xccnumr NO. zmv. m P.O. w
mcoSxnc �
.
�
con/z/
a/ 27 rn5
--- '
34.74
-----
xovwmrc ocAn;ns scRv
---- ----------
ncpmo 'pxnro
-----'' -----�--
10~4540~5*0~56
'!
3*,74��________._____
�
n63 128
um7m5
75 .10
ccvrRL xw/o pxorn
nspxIu pxnro
10~*5*0-560~56
oan/z^
;2/27/P5
_ 75.90
���7�!�xuru p�a7o
REPAIR pxe7o
1o~�s4n~s6�~su
^
1nn
' _ '---
-- _
�
c6312 9 --����r/o
z/zr/ns
12.30
� u u o ^
�uvp u sc*nn/o
,�~�zoz~1*o~14
i ^
���/�v
�z��o'------
��-�-� ^ ---------'---7�,wF-�-�cau0��---------rn~�anz----'
/an- vo
-- --
~
24.)0
'
�+�/o:'-
-'D����,��------
- 1zn���'---
--�'r����[-��n1����---
o��ir1
-�2
11s���
~
`vp.00 °
763 73 2
')2 127 ----
- 3 75.'0 ----
-P���-���--------------scu-ovpp[zcS
nZ45n4-;3*5~30 --
�
c63732
�2/ar~o5
375.-,0
nsao oxn
ocm suppccu
10~450*~350-30
�
n63nZ
- zrzrms
375. n
---'------��5
osnr BAG
scm uuppLzcs
10~45 04-6*6~6 4
'
�
�63 /32
J2/27 i8 5
����---_----��nw-8��----------�'-----��r-�V�p���
o��-Fn+--8ovzun-----'-----------
,950n.ro °
cas/�� ---'-]a���78�-------
� ��
��� �O---'--tril����-��r�-
-------'��nr�--------
n~*aaV-sa�~�� -----�
C63 1-i 3
J2v27185
1 ,54u.�0
crLzwosn czrY
pxmro
10-*e20-560-56
�
----_�__--_
zon oo
n °
/ *
~,
C63 734
uzrar^en
531 .50
rwzm nzry cnnpxcroo
comr scnv
10~*200~395~30
531.50
��--'-----------'------------------------�---
�
n63o5
u2/27m5
1801 .r0
*cmwspzm Cnuwrn
uLwc pnImrImo
---- ' -
10~4570-260-26
- - - �c
--_-
� n� .uo °
. m
.�
�
r63736
ozxzr/es
*n.00
ocpr or cwpLovsc
pan usnxIcc
1o~4ez�-�zu~�a
— -------'__-___-_---43,99
°
^
37,946.31
- -'
^'- '` ' om�
scmcp�� pomo
T ^
z46��
uR5-2s-�orA
cEmr?�r `
-----'-°-°^---cn-s
-
z"ss
poxo ar rnrxL
soLp cooxnc pumo
��-1v,»64^30--------'�ow0-4J-
povo zm rnrAL
nccncA7zow ccnrcm
puwo
~
|
mT�L ----
'--OrlLzry mwU -----------------------------
-
- '�
~~ �
282.92
Fown 50 rnmL
LIuunn ozopcmnwnv
pumo
-----'--__
363.-D
p»wo a» r»r«L
comoTnuc7�om rumo
�
'
59,~�39.,?
roroL
.�
.` ' �_,
j' ^
� .
»» 439.49--__-_'____________
z4~'/�_�
� �
- ---------''--
�
| /
----'-- -- --
r^�
- - ^'
[
�
--^"mv"
.
���-----------
�mn�=`�-------___�'
�
----- ---
m