Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-04-01_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APRIL 1, 1985 7:00 P.M. HOUSING-AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ROLLCALL MINUTES of March 18, 1985, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by EDINA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION - Edina Midget White A Hockey Team EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION - Mark Bernhardson MINUTES of the Special Meeting of March 11 and Regular Meeting of March 18, 1985, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by I. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. First Reading of Zoning Ordinance requires offering of Ordinance only.--- 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass Second Reading or if Second Reading should be waived. Lot Divisions, Plats, Appeals from Administrative or Board of Appeals and Adjustments decisions require action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass. A. B. C. *. D E: Zoning Change 1. First Reading a. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -3 Planned Residential District - Brutger Companies - Generally located west of Cahill Road and south of Dewey Hill Road (Continued from 3/18/85) b. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PSR -4 Planned Senior Residence District for Woodhaven - Generally located south of Interlachen Boulevard, west of Summit Avenue and north of Vernon Avenue - Lots 3, 4, 5, Block 4, Grandview Heights Preliminary Plat Approval 1. Interlachen Heights - Generally located west of Ridge Road and.north and -south of Interlachen Boulevard.. - Lot Division l., Lot 2, Block 1, Lindahl's Addn. - 4233 -35 Valley View Road CDBG Program Budget for Year XI Set Hearing Dates (4/15/85) 1. Preliminary Plat - William C. Hansen Addition - Generally located south of Grove Street and east of Johnson Drive 2. Final Development Plan - Ronald Clark - PRD -3 Planned Residential:District and Preliminary Plat - Edina Highpointe II - Generally located west of -- Cahill Road and north of Amundson Avenue extended II. PUBLIC HEARING ON STREET VACATION. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass. A Vacation of Portion of Lincoln Drive right -of -way - That part of Lot 4, Block 2, and of Outlot A, Edina Green lying within a 60 foot road easement (Continue to 4/15/85) III. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS IV. AWARD OF BIDS V. A. Braemar Golf Course Maintenance Building B* Deep Well Repair - Bailing and Reinstallation - Contract #85 -1 (Eng) C. Sand, Rock, Bituminous Materials and Water Treatment Chemicals RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Wooddale School B. Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission Vacancy C. Light Rail Transit - Elliott Perovich /Allison Fuhr D. Feasibility Report 485 -1 - Westwood Court Watermain E. Plan Approval - Blake Road /Vernon Avenue Traffic Signal - Tracy Avenue /Vernon Avenue Traffic Signal F. Cooperative Agreement - Hennepin County /Edina - I494 /France Av G. City Hall Space.Study Committee - Appointments H. Redevelopment of Mann France Avenue Drive -In Theatre Property I. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council J. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items 1. Senior Police Reserve 2. Volunteer Pension Resolution Project Bloomington Agenda Edina City Council April 1, 1985 Page Two VI. COMMUNICATIONS A. Jon Otterlei Letter - Lot 8, Block 3, Crocker and Crowell's First Addition B. 100% Petition - Watermain, Storm Sewer, Sanitary Sewer Extentions - Blocks 6 and 7, Findell Clark Addition VII. ORDINANCES. First Reading requires offering of Ordinance only. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass Second Reading. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass if Second Reading.waived. A. Second Reading 1. Ordinance No. 902 -A1 - To Allow Sales of Wine Only in Qualifying Restaurants VIII. FINANCE A. Set Hearing Date - Hospital System Revenue Bonds (4/15/85) B. 911 - Automatic Location Identification Costs C. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by for payment. of the following claims as per Pre -List dated 4/1/85: General Fund $77,268.72, Park Fund $9,600.00, Art Center $1,654.42, Golf Course Fund $11,843.45, Recreation Center Fund $2,826.95, Gun Range Fund $150.51, Utility Fund $6,796.90, Liquor Dispensary Fund $1,103.11, Construction Fund $2,033.39, Total $113,277.65, and for confirmation of payment of the following claims dated 2/28/85: General Fund $150,034.91, Park Fund .$1,414.31, Art Center $820.59, Swimming Pool Fund $65.53, Golf Course Fund $431.19, Recreation Center Fund $6,847.67, Gun Range Fund $512.25, Utility Fund $17,374.90, Liquor Dispensary Fund $251,338.82, Total $428,840.17 MINUTES EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MARCH 18, 1985 Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor Courtney. MINUTES of February 4, 1985, were approved as submitted by motion of Member Kelly, seconded by Member Turner. Ayes:. Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. There being fo further business, the meeting was adjourned by motion of Member Turner, seconded by Member Kelly. Motion carried. MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND THE ADVISORY BOARD OF HEALTH HELD AT CITY HALL MARCH 11, 1985 City Council Members present: Kelly, Turner, Richards, Courtney Advisory Board of Health Members present: Aadalen, Branch, Hagen, Hansen, McCollister, Rash, Reynolds and Wilder Human Relations Members present: Barman, Llona, Oye, Westphal, Workinger and Wright SHHSC representative present: Emerson Mayor Courtney stated that the Special Meeting of the Council and the Advisory Board of Health was called at the request of the Board so that they could advise the.Council of public health problems and concerns in Edina which have been identified by the Advisory Board of Health. Barbara Reynolds, Chairman of the Board, gave an overview of public health as to definition, focus, major values, major goals, major intervention strategies and enforcement. Chairman Reynolds then reviewed their report, "Public Health Problems /Concerns Identified by the Edina Health Advisory Committee." The report pointed out the following issues: 1) problems and concerns, 2) public health values /goals,.3) possible action steps, and 4) provider. The four major catagories identified and discussed were: 1) older adults, 2) Youth, 3) poverty, 4) domestic disturbances, and 5) visi- bility of public health services in Edina. Also discussed was the need for improving public relations with regard to informing the residents of the many human service agencies which are available to them in time of-crisis. Suggestions for.implementation included: City Newsletter article, more prominent placement in Sun directory, literature distribution at food distri- bution centers, dissemination through the Neighborhood Home Watch Program and infor- mation distribution at Expo '85. Because the meeting was called for information purposes only, no formal action was taken by the Council. The meeting was adjourned at 8:55 p.m. City Clerk MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MARCH 18, 1985 Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor Courtney. FLAG CEREMONY CONDUCTED BY CAMP FIRE TROOP NO. 263; CAMP FIRE WEEK PROCLAIMED. Members of Camp Fire Troop No. 263 opened the meeting by presenting the colors and Pledge of Allegiance. Mayor Courtney welcomed the members of the troop and then read the following proclamation: PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the national Camp Fire organization will be celebrating its 75th birthday on March 17, 1985; and WHEREAS, Camp Fire has chosen to commemorate this significant anniversary in a nationwide celebration of friendship; and WHEREAS, Camp Fire councils offer our young people opportunities to develop important friendships through informal educational programs for youth to age twenty -one; and WHEREAS, as a friend of its community, Camp Fire is concerned with preserving the environment, adapting to social change and the application of democratic standards, as well as a special concern for stimulating -and guiding young people; and WHEREAS, in Camp Fire, recognition of accomplishments is combined with the encouragement to use developing skills to carry out that spirit of friendship in service to others in the community; and WHEREAS, Camp Fire is commended for the opportunities for friendship its programs offer young people in the City of Edina and throughout the nation, and for the many services these young people perform for their communities as Camp Fire members; NOW, THEREFORE, I, C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby proclaim March 17 to March 23, 1985, to be CAMP FIRE BIRTHDAY WEEK and March 23, 1985, to be CAMPFIRE FRIENDSHIP DAY in the City of Edina. EMPLOYEE HAROLD SCHWARTZ COMMENDED. Mr. Rosland introduced Harold Schwartz and advised that Mr. Schwartz will be retiring on March 29. It was noted that he became employed in maintenance work in Morningside in 1960 and when Morningside was annexed by Edina in 1966, Mr. Schwartz then continued on as a light equip- ment operator. He was commended for his many years of loyal service.to the City and was presented with a silver.pen bearing the Edina logo. Members of the Council added their thanks and appreciation for his dedication years of service. MINUTES of the Regular Meetings of February 4 and 25, 1985, were approved as sub- mitted by motion of Member Kelly, seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED /TREE TRIMMING IMPROVEMENT NO. TT -03 AUTHORIZED. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Rosland advised that the City is proposing to contract for the trimming of 1604 trees in an.area bounded by Crosstown Highway on the south to the.northern.boundary line and from Highway 100 on the east to the western boundary line (County Road #18). If the project is authorized it will be started.this spring....It:.is expected that the .cost of trimming.would be assessed against benefited properties. Assessments would be levied late in 1986-and would be due and payable in full in 1987. Park and Recreation Director Kojetin explained that in the spring and summer of 1983 the -City ordered that a tree inventory be taken which would indicate the boulevard trees which need to be trimmed immediately or within 2 -3 years. He pointed out there is approximately 15 feet of boulevard in the front of most homes and trees that are within this 15 foot area are considered to be a city boulevard tree. Mr. Kojetin noted that a number of telephone calls have been received from residents who have had their trees trimmed since the survey was taken and that the.City Forester has checked those trees and if trimming is not indicated those trees will be excluded from the project. He also noted that any letters from residents regarding the proposed tree trimming project have been given to the Council Members. Mr. Kojetin stated that the cost per tree was estimated at approximately $45.00 and that subsequent low bid submitted showed $8.00 for trees 12" and under, and $30.00 for trees over 12 ". He advised residents who had any questions regarding boulevard trees on their property to call the City offices and their trees would be checked to determine if they should be included in the project. Raymond Clausen, 4820 Rolling Green Parkway, stated he objected to the proposed assessment for the project and that he felt the financing of the care of trees in the City should be through the regular budgeting process and the general tax levy. He stated further 3/18/85 that he owns a corner lot with a disproportionate number of trees compared to the average Edina property and would attract a correspondingly larger assessment to which he strongly objected. Mr. Rosland recalled that in the late 1950's the City did trim the trees by contract and assessed the costs. The City then moved into a program of trimming trees through the general tax fund until the invasion of Dutch Elm disease. Since that time the City crews have been used for removal of diseased trees in an effort to slow the spread of the disease and the trimming fell behind. Subsequently the Council made the decision to trim the trees and assess the costs. Member Turner submitted that in regard to tree trimming, in order to be consistent with the Council philosophy, where we can identify benefited property owners or users of programs we charge that benefited property owner or person. N.J. Jarmel, 4832 Westbrook Lane, stated that she objected to being assessed for -the proposed tree trimming project. Gary Brunkow, 5101 Skyline Drive, asked if owners would be assessed if their trees have been trimmed. Mr. Kojetin said the trees in question would be checked and excluded.if they did not need trimming.--John Carlstrom,.. -4504 Brookside Av. noted that their sidewalk had been moved when the street was improved and questioned if the new trees would be included. Mr. Kojetin responded that the City Forester would come out and check. No further comments being heard, Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION ORDERING TREE TRIMMING IMPROVEMENT NO. TT -03 BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly published and mailed to owners of each parcel within the area proposed to be assessed on the following proposed improvement: TREE TRIMMING IMPROVEMENT NO. TT -03 IN THE FOLLOWING: An area bounded by Crosstown Highway on the South, the Northern Boundary Line on the North, Highway 100 on the East and the Western Boundary Line (County Road 18) on the West. and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice, the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the said improvement including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisi- tion of necessary easements and rights for completion of such improvment; that said improvement is hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceed- ings as TREE TRIMMING IMPROVEMENT NO. TT -03 and the project is proposed to be assessed against properties having one or more boulevard trees. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. COUNCIL GIVES CONCEPT APPROVAL TO RECO11MENDATIONS FOR WOODDALE SCHOOL /UTLEY PARK AND W. 50TH STREET; VARIANCES TO BE SOUGHT. Mayor Courtney stated that Member Richards would chair this portion of the meeting. Member Richards recalled that the public hearing process on Wooddale School /Utley Park and W. 50th Street had begun on February 4, 1985, at which meeting the consultant had presented alternatives for the three issues. An objective, professional opinion and joint consultant /staff recommendation was presented by the City Planner and testimony was heard from the advisory boards /commissions, the Edina Historical Society, the Wooddale Neighborhood Council and the general public. The Council had continued the public hearing to this meeting to allow time to review and consider all the reports and comments submitted so that concept approval could be initiated at this meeting. Planner Hughes briefly reviewed the consultant /staff recommendations as follows: Wooddale School - Consul- tant recommends Alternate D which proposes retaining the historic facade on W. 50th Street as a monument; staff recommends Alternate E which proposes total demolition_ of the building with conversion of the entire site to a neighborhood park. Parks - consultant /staff recommends Alternate E for north of W. 50th Street which proposes a tot lot, multi - purpose court area and a turf area with the parking lot accessed off Wooddale Avenue; for Utley Park Alternate C which proposes a lagoon and island be created off Minnehaha Creek, parking lot accessed off W. 50th Street, and possibility of moving the Grange Hall and the old Cahill School from Tupa Park to an historic area in the westerly portion. W. 50th Street - West of Wooddale Avenue consultant/ staff recommends Alternate C which proposes a 68 ft. wide divided roadway with a landscaped median; East of Wooddale Avenue Alternate A is recommended which proposes no change in the existing 40 ft. width with improvements at the Wooddale intersection and a parking bay at St. Stephens Church. Member Richards noted that the Council has been provided with copies of all corresponsende which was sent to the Council indivi- dually or to City Hall. He then asked for any new testimony from the public. Jane Fuegner, 5225 Kellogg Avenue, asked if the recommended alternatives could be modified, especially with regard to leaving Utley Park as it now exists. Member Richards responded that at this point nothing is concrete, and that the suggestion to make no changes to Utley Park has been made verbally and in writing by various persons. Foster Dunwiddie, President of the Edina Heritage Preservation Board, submitted that he had discussed with the State Historic Preservation Board the possibility of moving the Grange Hall and the Cahill School to Utley Park under Alternate C. The 3/18/85 State has indicated that those buildings would immediately be taken off the National Register of Historic Places if they are moved. Mr. Dunwiddie added that he was concerned that because the criteria for National Register consideration has changed and is now more stringent that it would be doubtful if the buildings could be returned to the National Register. He expained that once a building that is on the National Register is moved, it is automatically removed from the National Register and you have to then re- apply. Mr. Dunwiddie also pointed out that the City was given a number of federal grants for the restoration of those properties and it may mean that some of those grants would have to be paid back to the State. Gred Nasby, 4908 W. Sunnyslope Road, said his main concern was the possible need for an elementary school in the area in the future and questioned whether or not the School Board's projection based on the next 10 years was, in fact, very short sighted. He stated he felt younger families would be moving into the area, that there would be a real need for a school, and that.the Wooddale School should be preserved. Joe Price, 4407 Country Club Road, referred to recent news - paper articles concerning potential users of the building and asked if the Council had been given any concrete proposals by potential users in terms of square footage, rental fees and years of usage. Marilyn Curtis, 4400 W. 50th Street, submitted that the Council had received copies of letters from potential users, namely, the Performing Arts Center, Edina Theatre Company, John Phillips Sousa Band and South Hennepin Human Services Council who are all interested in obtaining space in the Wooddale School building. She presented signatures of over 200 people in the area who are in favor of saving the building. Arthur Heiam,.5020 Arden Avenue, asked why it is deemed necessary to widen W. 50th Street west of Wooddale Avenue, and how it would be assessed or funded. Engineer Hoffman explained that both the consultant and the staff perceive a different character for the roadway west of Wooddale as to volume and traffic patterns. It is proposed to seek State Aid funds for recon- struction of the total length from Highway 100 to Halifax Avenue. He added that the portion west of Wooddale as proposed would meet State Aid requirements and for the section east of Wooddale it is recommended to seek a variance as to width which if approved would fund the cost of that portion of the roadway. Mr. Hoffman pointed out that the cost for burying the power lines would have to be assessed or come out of the City general fund. Robert Westenberg, 4910 Bruce Avenue, asked what the difference in cost would be between just resurfacing W. 50th Street versus reconstructing the roadway as proposed. Mr. Hoffman responded that the cost of removing the asphalt and replacing it would be approximately $110,000. The cost to reconstruct the roadway would be approximately $1,100,000 which could come from State Aid funds. He noted that over a 30 year period of time the City would spend more money in re- overlaying it than if the roadway were reconstructed due to the fact that the concrete bed below is not in good condition. Wally Olson, 5002 Bruce Avenue, stated that because of serious structural.:.damage.the roadway should be reconstructed. He stated he would like to go on record as being in favor of the proposal to remove Wooddale School and making that into.a park area and to widen W. 50th Street from Wooddale Avenue to Highway 100. Al Kluesner, 4409 Country Club Road, voiced concerns about the congestion at Browndale Avenue /W. 50th Street because of the road con- figuration and the canoe landing site and said consideration should be given to moving the canoe landing site further to the north. He also said there is concern in the neighborhood about.safety for those -using the proposed pedestrian underpass and that it would be more prudent to have the parking lot for the park.north of W. 50th Street access off W. 50th Street rather than Wooddale Avenue. No further public comment was heard. Member Richards recommended that the Council Members give their viewpoints on the three separate issues: 1) what to do with the Wooddale School, 2) what to do with the parks, and 3) what to do with W. 50th Street. Member Richards: Wooddale School - Have concluded that the building will never serve as a school in the future and cannot justify that it be maintained as a physical structure;.cannot be pursuaded that it is historically significant enough to save the entire building but would be willing to spend the funds to save it as a monument as proposed by Alternate D. Parks - North of W. 50th Street we should maximize the use of that area for parkland to serve basically the northeast sector of the community and spend the monies to upgrade it as a park; for Utley Park take more of a wait and see attitude to see how it might be developed, especially with regard to moving the Grange Hall and Cahill School to the site, and work with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to seek their participation in proposed improve- ments relating to the creek. 50th Street - East of Wooddale, accept staff recom- mendation to reconstruct at existing width and seek a variance to qualify for State Aid Funds; west of Wooddale, support widening roadway as proposed in Alter- nate B with left turn lanes; recommend that any State Aid funds received be allocated for the entire roadway if the variance for the segment east of Wooddale is not granted. Would support construction of parking bays on W.50th Street and Wooddale Avenue at St. Stephens Church. Would suggest that the trees east of Wooddale Avenue be replaced by larger size trees than normal because the existing trees have been emasculated by the power company and have lost their umbrella type beauty. 3/18/85 Member Turner: Wooddale School - Would support Alternate E to remove the building entirely; do not find alternative uses which are compatible with the surrounding land use that are self supporting and allow for adequate park area. The site is pivotal from a historic point of view and a park is important as a focal point for the neighborhood. Parks - North of W. 50th Street would support Alternate E to include a tot lot, playing fields for soccer /football /softball, with parking lot access off Wooddale Avenue; for Utley Park would support the lagoon and skating pond with funding participation by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, parking lot access off W. 50th Street, and suggest pursuing further the possibility of moving the Grange Hall and the Cahill School to the site. 50th Street - East of Wooddale Avenue, support Alternate A for reconstruction at existing width and seeking a variance for State Aid funding, would support burying the utilities and to explore sharing that cost with the utilities involved. West of Wooddale Avenue, cannot support Alternate C as the width would have too large an impact on the park, the library, the country club and homes along that area; would support Alternate B to allow left turn lanes, in favor of sidewalks both sides and lowering of crest of the hill. Would support parking bays on W. 50th Street and Wooddale Avenue at St. Stephens Church with partici- pation by the church. Member Kelly: Wooddale School - Have not been convinced that there is a public need for the building to justify the expense of maintaining it and would support Alternate E to remove the building entirely and to develop the area as a park to meet the needs of the neighborhood. Parks - Would support Alternate E for north of W. 50th Street; for Utley Park believe it should remain as it is for the morent. Cannot support the pedestrian underpass because of safety concerns. 50th Street - East of Wooddale Avenue would support Alternate A to reconstruct at existing width and seek a variance for State Aid funds, would support construction of parking bays at St. Stephens Church. West of Wooddale Avenue would support Alternate B to reconstruct at 52 foot width, would suggest that turning lanes be provided at Dale and Sunnyslope. Member Bredesen: Wooddale School - Feel strongly that the school should not have been closed, the reality is -that there will be no school there and therefore the school site should once again attempt to become the focal point for the neighborhood. Do not see any uses of the building compatible.with the neighborhood and would support Alternate E for total demolition and development of a park for the area. Parks - North of W. 50th Street.would like to see it provide active use for neighborhood families, concerned that playing fields for organized teams would preclude that. For Utley Park would like more discussion before a decision is made on the lagoon and skating pond. In support of the pedestrian underpass to connect the park areas. 50th Street - East of Wooddale would support Alternate A to reconstruct at existing width, with some of the cost to be assessed to the immediate neighborhood. Concerned about cost of burying utilities. West of Wooddale would support Alternate B to reconstruct at 52 foot width with some concern that speed on the roadway will increase. Mayor Courtney: Wooddale School - Support Alternate E for total demolition of build- ing. Parks - Support development of the park north of W. 50th Street as proposed. For Utley Park would like to see more study done before a decision is made on it. 50th Street - East of Wooddale Avenue would support Alternate A to reconstruct the roadway. Support Member Richard's suggestion that the trees be removed and replanted with younger trees. West of Wooddale Avenue, support Alternate B to reconstruct at 52 foot width. Member Richards summarized: l).that there is.no concensus on the pedestrian underpass, 2) that there is a 4 -1 concensus on what to do with the Wooddale School, 3) that the Park Board.should obtain input from the neighborhood on how the park north of W. 50th Street should be developed, 4) that with regard to the parking bays staff should contact St Stephens Church to discuss their financial participation, 5) that there is an immediate need to apply for a variance to reconstruct the portion of W. 50th Street from Wooddale Avenue to..Halifax Avenue at the existing 40 foot width to qualify for State Aid funds, 6) that the issues of burying the utility lines and the replacement of trees would.depend..on whether or not the variance is granted for use of State Aid funds, and 7) that revised plans be prepared for the segment of W. 50th Street west of Wooddale Avenue. Mr. Rosland suggested that it may be helpful for staff to put together a revised report with costs as an analysis of the Council's apparent concensus on the three issues, together with costs for those areas where there was a difference of viewpoints and to bring the data back for review before final action is taken by the Council. Member Kelly made a motion that the staff be directed to prepare revised plans, with costs, that would incorporate the Council's viewpoints on Wooddale School, the parks and W. 50th Street. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carriedl Idember Kelly then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: R V.gOT.TTTTn,z WHEREAS, the City of Edina wishes to reconstruct West 50th Street, between Wooddale Avenue and Halifax Avenue, in part using Municipal State -Aid Funds; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation Rule 8820.9912 requires that West 50th Street between Wooddale Avenue and Halifax Avenue have a minimum of four lanes; and `3/18/85 WHEREAS, the City of Edina believes there are valid reasons for constructing West 50th Street to a lower design standard and that such lower design standard will safely and adequately handle existing and proposed traffic; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, that the City Engineer be directed to submit to the Commissioner of Transportation a formal request for variance for West 50th Street between Wooddale Avenue and Halifax Avenue from the minimum number of required four lanes in order to construct two lanes. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. PUBLIC HEARING ON ZONING CHANGE (R -1 TO PRD -3) FOR BRUTGER COMPANIES CONTINUED. As recommended by staff, Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Kelly to continue the public hearing on the Zoning Change from R -1 to PRD -3 for the Brutger Companies, for property generally located west of Cahill Road and south of Dewey Hill Road, to the Council Meeting of April 1, 1985. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. FINAL PLAT APPROVED FOR DENNIS MILLER ADDITION. Mr. Hughes presented the petition for final plat approval for the Dennis Miller Addition, generally located north of Grove Street and east of Johnson Drive. The subject property is an existing R- 1,.Single..Dwelling Unit District lot which was proposed to be subdivided into two lots. The easterly lot would be retained for the existing dwelling and the westerly lot would be a new buildable lot. Mr. Hughes recalled that the Council had granted preliminary plat approval at its meeting of August 20, 1984 and advised that the final plat proposed is the same as the preliminary plat. Staff would recommend final plat approval, subject to a subdivision dedication. In this case, staff would recommend that Outlot A (the northerly 77 feet) be dedicated to the City which would expand Garden Park which adjoins the subject property on its north and west boundaries. No objections being heard, Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved adoption, subject to Outlot A being dedicated to the City: RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR DENNIS MILLER ADDITION BE.-IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "Dennis Miller Addition ", platted by Jeffrey B. Stevenson and Nancy A. Stevenson, husband and wife, and Dennis V. Miller and Janelle K. Miller, husband and wife, and City County Credit Union, a Minnesota corporation, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of March 18,1985, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR LOT 5, BLOCK 1, THE HABITAT. Mr. Hughes presented a petition for division of Lot 5, Block 1, The Habitat, advising that the applicant requests a party wall division of an existing double boungalow. Separate utility connections have-been provided.and staff would recommend approval. No objections being heard, Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land: Lot 5, Block 1, The Habitat, City of Edina, Hennepin County, MN, and WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: Parcel A - The northeasterly 48.00 feet of Lot 5, Block 1, The Habitat, according to the record plat thereof, City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota and Parcel B - That part of Lot 5, Block 1. The Habitat, lying southwesterly of the northeasterly 48.00 feet thereof, according to the record plat thereof, City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota; WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose 3/18/85 or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. HEARING DATES SET FOR VARIOUS PLANNING MATTERS. As recommended by staff, Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Richards, setting March 25, 1985, as, hearing date for the following planning matters: 1) Preliminary Plat - Interlachen Heights - Generally located west of Ridge Road and north and south of Interlachen Boulevard 2) Zoning Change - R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PSR -4 Planned Senior Citizen District - Generally located south of Interlachen Boulevard, west of Summit Avenue and north of Vernon Avenue and setting April 1, 1985, as hearing date for CDBG Program Proposed Budget for Year XI. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. VACATION GRANTED FOR PORTION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT, LOT 22, BLOCK 4, LAKE EDINA ADDITION. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hoffman advised that the request is to vacate a one foot.strip of the 10 foot drainage and utility easement on Lot 22, Block 4, Lake Edina Addition because one corner of the house encroaches upon the easement. He pointed out that the utility companies have no objection to vacating the one foot strip and staff would recommend that the vacation be granted. No objection being heard, Member Bredesen offered the following resolution and moved adoption: .RESOLUTION VACATING PORTION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 4th day of February, 1985, fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of portion of easement for drainage and utility purposes; and WHEREAS, two week's published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the hearing was held on the 18th day of March, 1985, at which time all persons desiring to b�e heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered the extent to which the vacation affects existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described portion of the drainage and utility easement be and is vacated effective as of March 18, 1984: .All.that part of the ten (10) foot drainage and utility easement along the southeasterly line of Lot 22, Block 4, Lake Edina 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying northwesterly of a line drawn parallel with and distant 9.00 feet north- westerly of the southeasterly line of said Lot 22, except for the southerly 5 feet of Lot 22, and that the City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice of completion of proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County Auditor, and filed with the Register of Deeds, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. VACATION GRANTED CONDITIONALLY FOR PORTION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT, LOT 29 BLOCK 1, WARDEN ACRES PETERSON REPLAT... Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hoffman advised that at its meeting of March 5, 1984, the Council had granted a lot division for Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Warden Acres Peterson Replat resulting in a 14 foot lot line adjustment between the two lots to allow more freedom in siting a dwelling on Lot 3. The underlying drainage and utility easement must now be moved from the former lot line to the new lot line. Staff would recommend that the vacation request be granted, subject to receipt of a new easement over the new lot line. No ojbection being heard, Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, 3/18/85 subject to receipt of a new easement over the new lot line: RESOLUTION VACATING PORTION OF DRAINAGE AND UTLITY EASEMENT WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 4th day of February, 1985, fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of portion of easement for drainage and utility purposes; and WHEREAS, two week's published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the hearing was held on the 18th day of March, 1985, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered the extent to which the vacation affects existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described portion of the drainage and utility easement be and is vacated effective as of March 18, 1984: The south 5 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, Warden Acres Peterson Replat except the east 10 feet and the west 5 feet thereof and the north 5 feet of Lot 3, Block 1, Warden Acres Peterson Replat except the east 10 feet and the west 5 feet thereof, and that the City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice of completion of proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County Auditor, and filed with the Register of Deeds, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. BID AWARDED FOR TREE TRIMMING IMPROVEMENT NO. TT -03. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of bids for Tree Trimming Improvement No. TT -03 showing Arps Tree Service at $8..00 for tree size 12" and under and $30.00 for tree size over 12 "; Midwest Stump at $20.00 for tree size 12" and under and $54.00 for tree size over 12 "; Tri State Tree Service at $22.00 for tree size 12" and under and $55.50 for tree size over 12 "; and Davey (United Tree Service) at $23.00 for tree size under 12" and $55.00 for tree size over 12 ". Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid to recommended low bidder Arps Tree Service at $8.00 for tree size 12" and under and $30.00 for tree size over 12 ". Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR TORO GROUNDSMASTER 72. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of bids for a Toro Groundsmaster 72 for the Park Department showing MTI Toro Distributing Company at $5,386.00, Reinders Brothers, Inc. at $11,385.00, and Long Lake Ford 3 Tractor at $6,500.00. Member Kelly's motion was seconded by Member Bredesen for award of bid to recommended low bidder MTI Toro Distributing Company at $5,386.00. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. BIDS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SEDANS REJECTED. Mr. Rosland stated that staff would recommend that the bids received for administrative sedans be rejected due to the fact that the bids exceeded our budgeted amount for administrative vehicles. Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Kelly to reject all bids for admini- strative sedans because the bids exceeded the amount budgeted. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR TWO DUMP TRUCKS WITH STANDARD DUMP BOX. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of bids for two dump trucks with standard dump box showing Astleford Equipment Company, Inc. at $42,679.00, North Star International Trucks, Inc. at $42,797.00, Lakeland Ford Truck Sales, Inc. at $43,594.00, Boyer Ford Truck Sales at $43,865".00. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid to recommended low bidder Astleford Equipment Company, Inc. at $42,679.00 each. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR DUMP TRUCK WITH BOX FOR LOADALL ADDITION. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of bids for one dump truck with box for loadall addition showing Lake- land Ford Trucks Sales, Inc. at $42,164.00 and Boyer Ford Trucks, Inc. at $43,364.00. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid to recommended low bidder Lakeland Ford Trucks Sales, Inc. at $42,164.00. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. 3/18/85 BID AWARDED FOR 1/2 TON PICKUP TRUCK WITH V -8 ENGINE. Mr. Rosland presented tabula- tion of bids for one 1/2 ton pickup truck with V -8 engine showing Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet at $8,754.00 and Melva Yokiel Motors, Inc. at $9,229.00. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner for award of bid to recommended low bidder Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet at $8,754.00. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR 1/2 TON PICKUP TRUCK WITH HEAVY DUTY V -8 ENGINE. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of bids for one 1/2 ton pickup truck with heavy duty V -8 engine for the Utility Department showing Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet at $9,254.00 and Melva Hokiel Motors, Inc. at $9,760.00. Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid to recommended low bidder Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet at $9,254.00. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR TWO 1/2 TON PICKUP TRUCKS WITH STANDARD SIX ENGINE. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of-bids for two 1/2 ton pickup trucks with standard six engines showing Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet at $8,204.00 and Melva Yokiel Motors at $8,936.00. Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid to recommended low bidder Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet at $.8,204.00. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. BOARD /COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS APPROVED. Mayor Courtney recommended that -the following appointments be made: Board of Appeals and Adjustments - Mary Schrock for term to 2 -1 -88; Human Relations Commission - Winton Boyd for term to 2 -1 -88, and Edina Heritage Preservation Board - David Gepner for term to 2 -1 -87. . Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner to approve the recommended appointments. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. COUNCIL LIASION WITH BOARDS /COMMISSIONS CONFIRMED. The Council Members informally agreed to act as liasion with the various advisory boards /commissions as follows: Member Bredesen - Building Construction Appeals Board, Energy Commission (inactive) and Community Development and Planning Commission; Member Kelly - Edina Advisory Board of Health and Edina Art .Center Committee; Member Richards - Edina Park Board, Edina Recycling Commission and Edina Heritage Preservation Board; Member Turner - Human Relations Commission, Board of Appeals and Adjustments and South Hennepin Human Services Council. CORPORATE REPORT PRESENTED TO COUNCIL. Mr. Rosland commented that the City of Edina Corporate Report for 1984 was distributed to the Council Members for their infor- mation and that no action is required. Member Kelly said that the report was well prepared and of great benefit to her as a new member of the Council. Member Turner suggested that copies of the Report be distributed to the School Board, other local elected officials, the Chamber of Commerce and also to make it known that the Report is available to anyone interested. BEER, CLUB LIQUOR AND SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS APPROVED. The Council was advised of receipt of the following applications for renewal of Beer, Club Liquor and Sunday Liquor Licenses - On -Sale Beer: Braemar Golf Course, Dayton's Boundary Waters Restaurant, Donaldson's Minnesota Room, Ediner Restaurant, Edina American Legion Post No. 471, Empress Restaurant, Edina Golf Dome, J. P.'s Restaurant, King's Court, Los Primos Restaurant, Monterey Jacks, The New LeBistro Cafe of Edina, Original Pancake House, Rigotto's Pizza Restaurant, Szechuan Star Restaurant, T.J.'s Family Restaurant, Gus Young's, Inc. Biltmore Bowl and Southdale Bowl; Off -Sale Beer:. Byerlys of Edina, Edina Superette, Inc., Holiday Station Stores, Jerry's Foods, Kenny's Markets, Q Petroleum Corporation, Red Owl Country Store and Superamerica Stations, Inc.; Club Liquor /Sunday Liquor: Edina Country Club and Interlachen Country Club. Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Kelly for issuance of the license renewals, subject to approval by the Police Department. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. JOINT COUNCIL /ADVISORY BOARD OF HEALTH MEETING DISCUSSED. Member Kelly commented that she felt the joint meeting of the Council and the Advisory Board of Health held on March 11, 1985, was of great benefit to both the Council Members and the Board Members and that she hoped the recommendations, especially with regard to promoting the distribution of information to the residents of Edina of the many human service agencies available to them, would be put into practice. Mr. Rosland responded that the recommendations are being initiated. No formal action was taken. 3/18/85 COUNCIL PARTICIPATION IN EXPO '85 DISCUSSED. Member Turner advised that the City of Edina will provide exhibits and demonstrations of various City services at Expo '85 to be held on April 20 and 21 in a similar manner as was done for Expo '83. The Council Members have been asked to again participate by being available in the City's display room to talk with citizens. Member Turner recommended that the Council participate again and asked that the Members sign up on the staff schedule for the hour they would be in attendance. SURPLUS FOOD DISTRIBUTION UPDATE GIVEN. Member Turner reported that one more firm has volunteered a truck and driver to assist with the monthly surplus food distri- bution to Edina residents. Jerry's Foods of Edina will be sharing the task with Key Cadillac, Colonial Church, volunteers at the Senior Center and other individual volunteers. She suggested that the Mayor again send a letter of thanks to Jerry's Foods for their participation in this community effort. POLICE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT DISCUSSED. In reference to the Police Department Annual Report, Member Turner asked if the Neighbors Home Watch Program has had an inpact on the statistics as reported. Chief Swanson commented that burglaries in 1984 were under 300 cases, which is down from 550 three years ago, and that although the crime rate is down on the national level, it is felt that the Program has had a positive effect. INPUT ON CRITERIA FOR SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT DISCUSSED. .Member Richards called the Council's attention to a request from the School Board for input as to criteria to be used in selection of a superintendent for School District No. 273. He stated that he felt one factor which should be communicated to the School Board was that the person selected should have strong attributes -of.community involvement and in working with other governmental bodies and that the person should-be looked on as serving the entire community. Mayor Courtney reiterated the criteria suggested by Member Richards and said he had talked with Nancy Atchison, School Board Chair, and had conveyed to her that he felt the school superintendent should have a well - rounded background and be able to work with the City. No formal action was taken. CITY HALL SPACE STUDY COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland reminded the Council Members to submit names for the City Hall Space Study Committee to the Mayor so that the committee could be activated and the study begun. He pointed out that the staff is working on the design of a new dispatch center and before that can be finalized it is necessary to know what the long range plan may be for the City Hall building. It was informally agreed to appoint the committee members at the Council Meeting of April 1, 1985. AGENDA FOR SPECIAL.COUNCIL MEETING ON MARCH 25, 1985, RESCHEDULED FOR APRIL 1. Because.two Council Members will be absent from the Special Council Meeting set for March 25, 1985, Mr. Rosland recommended that the Special Meeting not be held and that those agenda items be hel& over to the Regular Meeting on April 1, 1985. Member Richards made a motion to re -set the hearing dates for the following planning matters from March 25, 1985, as .set earlier in the meeting, to April 1: 1) Preliminary Plat - Interlachen Heights 2) Zoning Change - R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PSR -4 Planned Senior Citizen District and to not hold a Special. Council Meeting on March 25, 1985, but hold over any agenda items until..the Regular Meeting of April 1, 1985. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. EDINA MIDGETS TO BE COMMENDED FOR WINNING STATE CHAMPIONSHIP. Mr. Rosland noted that the Edina Midgets Hockey Team had won the State that Member Turner's son was a team member. He added dation would be presented to the team. Championship tournament and that a resolution of commen- REPORT GIVEN ON RESCHEDULING OF BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS. Mr. Rosland recalled that at its meeting on January 7, 1985, the Council had approved the capital improvements for Braemar Golf Course consisting of 1) renova- tion and expansion of the maintenance building,.2) expansion of the Par 3 to an Executive Course, and 3) renovation and expansion of the clubhouse. He reported that it is now recommended to award bids on the clubhouse improvements in August and start the construction in September, to construct the Executive Course during th& fall and winter months when ground conditions are more favorable. Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Richards, to approve the rescheduling Braemar Golf Course capital improvements as recommended. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. MEMBER TURNER NOMINATED TO BOARD OF ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES. Mayor Courtney advised that there are vacancies on the Board of the Association 3/18/85 of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) and recommended that Member Turner's name be submitted as a nominee to the AMM Board if she was willing to serve in that capacity. Member Turner stated she would be willing to have her name placed in nomination. Mayor Courtney then moved that a letter be sent to the AMM nominating Leslie Turner as a Board member. Motion was seconded by Member Bredesen. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED APPROVING FINAL PLAN FOR FRANCE AV/494 INTERCHANGE PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING EXPENDITURE OF STATE AID FUNDS. Mr. Rosland referred to the memorandum of Engineer Hoffman regarding the France Avenue /I -494 Interchange Project which stated that the project is ready for bid letting on 3/22/85. The project has received final approval from the Transportation Advisory Board of the Metropolitan Council for the appropriate federal aid urban funding which will be 76% of the job cost: Previously, during 1984, the City Council approved final plans for Hennepin County on this project. However, the Minnesota Department of Transportation has agreed to assume contract administration of the project and this change necessitates that the Council re- approve the plans. As to financial participation, staff recommends the City participate to the extent that our State Aid Funds can be utilized. The total project cost is approximately 4.5 million dollars and the City participation is estimated at $478,095.63. The State Aid office requires that the Council must authorize this appropriation of State Aid Funds by resolution. Member Turner then introduced the following resolutions and moved adoption: RESOLUTION APPROPRIATION OF MUNICIPAL STATE AID FUNDS WHEREAS, it has been deemed advisable and necessary for the City of Edina to participate in the cost of a construction project located on C.S.A.H. No. 17 within the limits of said municipality, and WHEREAS, said construction project has been approved by the Department of Highways and identified in its records as S.P. No. 2785 -235, 2785 -237, 2785 -238, Federal Project 125024, and Edina S.A.P. 120 - 020 -13, 120 - 020 -14, and 120 - 020 -15; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that we do hereby appropriate from our Municipal State -Aid Street Funds the sum of $500,000.00 to apply toward the construction of said project and request the Commissioner of Highways to approve this authorization. RF.g0T.TTTT0N WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Transportation for the State of Minnesota has pre- pared: plans, special provisions, and specifications for the improvement of Trunk Highway No. 393, renumbered as Trunk Highway No. 494, and CSAH 17 (France Avenue) within the corporate limits of the City of Edina, from the So. Corp. Limits to 670 feet north of 77th Street; and seeks the approval thereof; NOW, THEN, BE IT RESOLVED that said plans and special provisions for the improve- ment of said Trunk Highway and County Roadway within said corporate limits of the City, be and hereby are approved including the elevations and grades as shown and consent is hereby given to any and all changes in grade occasioned by said con - struction; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City does hereby agree to ban the parking of all vehicles, on both sides of roadways as constructed per plans, and special pro- visions of above project. Motion for adoption of the resolutions was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney .Resolutions adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A1 TO ALLOW SALES OF WINE ONLY IN QUALIFYING RESTAURANTS GIVEN FIRST READING. Mr. Rosland recalled that at its meeting of January 21,..1985, the Council had given concept approval to a draft ordinance to allow sales of wine only in qualifiying restaurants and had directed the staff to bring back a revised draft which would address the issues on which the.Council had not con- curred. Those issues were:.1) Zoning (whether on sale wine licenses should be issued in the PC -1 District), 2) Sunset provision, 3) Individual server and /or manager license, 4) Fees (whether fees should be graduated) 5) Size of service of wine, and 6) Live entertainment (possible concern). With regard to whether all wine servers should be licensed or just the manager, because of employee turn- over staff would recommend that.licensed managers be on duty at-all times but that individual servers not be licensed. Member Richards stated that he did not support individual licensing, either of servers or managers, that the applicant will hold the license and will be accountable for hiring responsible persons to serve the wine as is done with serving of liquor at the country clubs. In response Chief Swanson said that we are looking to do everything we can to assure that wine is dispensed legally and appropriately and that the difference is that wine served in restaurants is in a public setting versus the private setting of the clubs and that at least one licensed responsible person should be at the .3/18/85 location at all times to supervise the dispensing of wine. The licensing of one agent of the owner will assist that owner and help assure that as few violations as possible are made. Member Kelly voiced her concerns as follows: 1) consider limiting number of licenses, 2) concern about neighborhood restaurants serving wine, 3) enforcement and inspection procedures, 4) in support of graduated fee, 5) in support of licensing one responsible individual, not all servers, 6) opposed to sunset provision. Member Turner stated her position as follows: 1) in support of sunset provision, 2) opposed to limiting number of wine licenses, 3) supports wine licenses for C -1, C -2 and C -3 Districts, 4) in support of a graduated fee schedule. Member Bredesen gave his position as follows: 1) opposed to wine licenses in C -1 District, and would limit by ordinance the number of seats that can be licensed for wine within the C -2 District, 2) in support of sunset pro- vision, 3) not in support of licensing individual servers or managers, 4) that there be strict enforcement of the ordinance. Mayor Courtney stated that he felt all restaurants should be allowed to sell wine, that when the issue was put to the residents for an advisory vote it did not say some restaurants would be allowed to have wine licenses and others would not. Mayor Courtney called for comment from the public. Jerry Brower stated he was a resident of Bloomington and part owner of the new Bravo! Italian Specialties, 4936 France Avenue So. and said he was concerned about competition if the restaurant did not qualify for a wine license. He explained that the restaurant would provide that people order and pick -up their food and carry it to tables to eat it. Mr. Rosland stated that according -to the definition of "restaurant" in the ordinance, the restaurant would not qualify for a wine license. June Schmidt, 7005 Bristol Boulevard, voiced her objection to the wine licensing ordinance and in summary stated that the passage of the ordinance will be divisive, will pit neighbor- hood against neighborhood and food vendor against food vendor and will cost all the taxpayers in Edina. Jane Fuegner,.5225 Kellogg Avenue, asked if the serving of the wine will be limited by the glass, carafe or bottle. Mr. Rosland responded that the ordinance provides that wine may not be sold, served or consumed in containers larger in volume than one liter. Victor Oliver, 6620 Parkwood Road, stated he strongly objected to the ordinance to allow wine licensing. No further public.comment.being heard, Member Richards introduced Ordinance No. 902 -A1 for First Reading as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A1 DRAFT ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 902 TO ALLOW SALES OF WINE ONLY IN QUALIFYING RESTAURANTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Definitions. To Section 1 the following definitions are added and amended as follows: "Bar" means a counter or similar kind of place or structure at which wine is served but not in conjunction with regular full i menu service. "City" means the City of Edina. "Commissioner" means the State Commissioner of Public j Safety. "Council" means the Council of the City of Edina. "Licensed Premises" means the area shown in the application as the place where wine will be served and consumed. "Meal" means entrees and sandwiches offered on a restaurant menu. � "Person" means and includes any individual, partnership, association, trust, institution, corporation, or municipality, and includes also the municipal liquor store. "Restaurant" means an establishment, under control of a single proprietor or manager, having appropriate facilities for serving meals and where in consideration of payment therefore, meals are regularly served at tables to the general public, and which employs an adequate staff to provide the usual and suitable service to its guests. This definition amends and supersedes the definition of "Cafe and Restaurant" in Ordinance No. 902. "State ".means the State of Minnesota. "Wine" means vinous beverage created by fermentation. Sec. 2. Sec. 21, No Liquor in Restaurants, is hereby amended by adding at the beginning thereof the words "Except as permitted under Part H of this Ordinance." Sec. 3. Part H is hereby added as follows: "PART H. ON SALE OF WINE ONLY IN RESTAURANTS" Sec. 36. License Required. (a) No person shall, directly or indirectly, upon any pretense or by any device, sell for on -sale any wine at or under 14% by volume in conjunction with the sale of food without first having received a license therefor pursuant to this Part H. (b) On -sale wine licenses shall be granted only to qualifying restaurants, as determined below, holding a valid food establishment license under Ordinance 731. 3/18/85 Sec. 37. Licensing Procedure. (a) The provisions of Ordinance too. 141 of the City including the penalty provisions thereof shall apply to all licenses issued under this Part H and to the holders of such licenses, except that licenses and renewals thereof shall be granted or denied by the Council. Additionally, all licenses must be approved by the Commissioner. Every person licensed, or applying for a license, under this ordinance, in addition to other requirements imposed by this ordinance for the obtaining or renewal of a license, shall demonstrate proof of financial responsibility with regard to liability imposed by Minnesota Statutes, Section 340.95, to the City Clerk, as a condition to the issuance or renewal of such license, in the manner and to the extent required by Minnesota Statute, Section 340.11, Subdivision 21, provided, if any licensee or applicant claims exemption from the requirements of said statute, proof of such exemption shall be established by affidavit given by such licensee or applicant, such affidavit to be in form and substance acceptable to the City Clerk. (b) In addition to the requirements set forth in Paragraph (a) of this section, the applicant shall, in the application form, provide all information required by the State of Minnesota Department of Public Safety and such other information as deemed necessary by'the City during the application process to determine compliance with the provisions of this ordinance and applicable State laws and regulations. (c) Applications for the renewal of an existing license shall be made at least 60 days prior to and not earlier than 150 days prior to the date of expiration of the license. The renewal application may incorporate by reference all information contained in the original application, to the extent such information is then true, current, and applicable. If, in the judgment of the City Council, good and sufficient cause for the applicant's failure to apply for a renewal within the time provided is shown, the City Council may, if the other provisions of this ordinance are complied with, grant the application notwithstanding such failure to timely apply. (d) No license shall be transferred to any person or i premises by the person or from the premises to whom and for which the license was granted, by any means whatsoever, including, without limitation, devise, descent, or involuntarily by the operation of law, without the person and premises to whom and to which the license is to be transferred having first submitted an application containing all of the information required in an original application, and complying with all requirements for an original license, and receiving the approval of the Council, and where required, the Commissioner of Public Safet y, provi� �d that an application for transfer may refer to, and incorporate ! -- therein by reference, the information set forth in the original application for the license to be transferred, to the extent such information is then true, current and applicable. (e) Any change in the persons named in the original application or any change in the original application, as required by Sec. 37 of .this ordinance, including any change in the managers or persons in charge of the licensed premises, or any change in the licensed premises or seating capacity, then, shall be deemed a transfer for purposes of this ordinance; provided, however, if the licensee is a limited partnership, a change in the limited partners of 108 or less cumulatively over the then license period, shall not be deemed a transfer; and provided further, however, that if the licensee is a corporation, a change in stock ownership of 108 or less, cumulatively over the then license period, shall not be deemed a transfer. i Sec. 38. Financial Requirements. (a) Investigation Fees and Deposit - At the time of original application, the applicant shall deposit $500 with the City of Edina for the Investigation Fee. Should the investigation require an out -of -state investigation, an additional $2000 shall be deposited prior to further processing of the application by the City. The cost of the investigation shall be based on the expense involved, but in no event shall it exceed $500 if the investigation is limited to the State of Minnesota or $10,000 if outside the State. All deposit monies not expended on the investigation shall be either applied to the license fee or refunded to the applicant. All investigative expenses incurred in excess of the deposit shall be paid prior to consideration of the license application by the Council. Investigation fees for license renewal shall not exceed $100 unless there is a change of ownership of more than 108 cumulatively over the then existing license period as provided in Section 37.(e) of this ordinance. 3/18/85 (b) License Fees - The applicable fees are listed in Ordinance 171. Licenses terminated prior to the end of the term shall be prorated quarterly with fees being refunded for any quarter or quarters in which the license was not used. All fees shall be paid prior to consideration of license application by the Council. Should any license application be withdrawn or denied, the fee shall be refunded except for $75.00. Provided, however, if denied because of willful misstatement in the application, no refund shall be made. (c) Bond and Insurance - The same requirements set forth in Sec. 11 of this ordinance applies to licenses under Part H. The insurance requirements set out in Section 37 of this Ordinance must be met prior to issuance of a license under this Part H. (d) Other Fees - All fees, assessments and taxes delinquent at time of license issuance must be paid prior to issuance of the license as required by Sec. 12 (f) of this ordinance. Sec. 39. Conditions of Licensing. In addition to the conditions set forth in Sec. 12 (d) and (e) and Sec. 13 (d), the following conditions apply both as a condition of license approval and ongoing license retention: (a) Licensee - The licensee must: 1) Be of good moral character and repute. 2) Be of legal drinking age. 3) Be eligible under Minnesota Statutes Ch. 340, and the regulations promulgated by the Commissioner. 4) Be an individual owner, a partne =ship or a corporation. 5) If an individual, not have (A) been convicted within the five years prior to the application for a license, of any violation of any law of the -United States, the State of Minnesota, or any other . state or territory, or of any local ordinance with regard to: (i) the manufacture, sale, distribution or possession for sale or distribution of intoxicating liquor or other controlled substances; (ii) gambling; (iii) theft; (iv) vice; or (B) had an intoxicating liquor license, including a wine - only on -sale license, revoked for any violation of any statutes, ordinances or regulations relating to the manufacture, sale, distribution or possession of intoxicating liquor or wine. i 6) Have an individual in charge, or manager, of the licensed premises, who is generally present on the licensed premises who would be eligible for a license under this Part H to be issued directly to him as an individual licensee. This person shall hold an individual manager's license issued pursuant to Section 43 hereof, and must sign a statement indicating he has reviewed and under- stands the pertinent sections of this Ordinance and of State laws and regulations. 7) Not have applied for nor hold a federal ltholesale or retail liquor dealer's special stamp or a _ federal or state gambling or gaming stamp or license. 8) Not be an employee or elected official of the City j of Edina. 9) Not have falsified any information given either in the application or in the process of investigation. 10) On renewal not have been found in violation of any provision of this ordinance or applicable State statutes or regulations. 11) If an individual, be a U.S. citizen. 12) Not be financially indebted to a person who is disqualifed under Subparagraphs 5, 7 and 11 of this paragraph (a). (b) Licensed Premises - The licensed premises must meet the following requirements: 1) Be in a PC1, PC2 or PC3, or Mixed Development District or be in a restaurant permitted in the R -1 District, as established by the City Zoning Ordinance. 2) Have an exclusive entrance from or exit to the exterior of the building in which the licensed premises are located. Entrances or exits from or to a public concourse or public lobby meet this requirement. 3) Be under the control of the licensee. 4) Be a restaurant having facilities for seating not fewer than 25 guests at one time. 5) Have a valid food establishment license and have a kitchen approved by the City Public Health Sanitarian. 6) Have appropriate space for storage, preparation or other handling or service of food which is not be adversely impacted by the storage and service of wine. 3/18/85 7) Have a physical barrier between non - licensed premises and the licensed premises which prevents the passing of patrons from the licensed premises . to areas outside of the licensed premises, except for approved and required entrances and exits to and from the restaurant portion of the licensed premises. This includes but is not limited to licensed premises outside a building or in a public, or quasi - public, mall, concourse, plaza or similar area. 8) Be in compliance with all applicable codes, ordinances, statutes and regulations. Sec. 40. Conditions of Sale. In addition to the conditions stated in Section 12 (a), (b), (g) and (h); Sec. 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 31 and 33, the following apply to licenses issued under this Part H: (a) No person shall be sold, served, or consume wine who does not order a meal to be consumed with the wine. (b) No wine over 14% alcohol by volume may be sold or consumed. (c) No sales or consumption of wine shall be permitted at a bar or beyond the licensed premises. (d) Wine may not be sold, served or consumed in containers larger in volume than one liter. (e) No person working in the licensed premises may be under the established legal drinking age except busboys, dishwashers, musicians, waiters and waitresses. (f) No licensee shall promote the consumption of wine on the licensed premises by an means or methods which result in wine prices which are.less than those normally- charged on the then regularly -used menu, including, but not limited to, two- for -one or similar '. offers, prizes, coupons, games or barters. (g) No licensee shall sell, offer for sale, or keep for sale wine in any original package that has been refilled or partly refilled. No licensee shall directly, or through any other person, dilute, or in any manner tamper with, the contents of any original package so as to change its composition or alcoholic content while in the original package. Possession on the premises by the licensee of any wine in the original package differing in composition, alcoholic content or type from the wine received from the manufacturer or wholesaler from whom it was purchased, shall be prima facie evidence that the contents of the original package have been diluted, changed or tampered (h) Licensees under this Part H may sell wine during the same hours on Sunday as holders of Sunday sale licenses may sell intoxicating liquor. •? (i) The City inspections authorized by Section 12 (g) of this ordinance are anticipated to be made at least twice during each license period. (j) All applicable provisions of State statutes and regulations shall be complied with in connection with the on -sale of wine. Sec. 41. Suspension and Revocation. The enforcement, suspension and revocation provisions of Ordinance No. 141 shall apply to all licenses issued under Part B of this ordinance, except to the extent inconsistent with applicable State statutes and regulations, and in the event of such inconsistencies, the State statutes and regulations shall apply. Sec. 42. Individual Licensing of Servers. (a) All personnel who physically serve wine to patrons must possess an individual server's license issued by the City. This does not prohibit unlicensed personnel from taking orders for wine in conjunction with the sale of food, but wine may only be served by licensed personnel. (b) In order to be licensed, servers must meet the requirements set forth in Sec. 39 (a) (1, 2, 5, 9 and 11), together with signed statement indicating they have reviewed and understand the pertinent sections of this ordinance and of State laws and regulations. (c) The license fee is set forth in Ordinance 171 and shall not be prorated upon termination. Sec. 43. Manager's License. (a) The manager or person in charge shall be an individual, and shall be designated in the license application. 3/18/84 (b) The person so designated shall apply for an individual manager's license on application forms provided by the City Clerk. The application shall_ be processed with the application of the licensee. (c) No investigative fees additional to those required by Section 38 shall be required for a manager's license application, but if investigation of the proposed manager results in additional expense, or out of state investigation, additional deposits may be required to be made under Section 38. (d) The person so designated, in order to be granted a manager's license hereunder, shall and must comply with all requirements of this ordinance, State statutes and regulations which are applicable to an applicant for an on -sale wine license under this Part H, including, without limitation, Sec. 39 (a) of this Part H. (e) The license fee is listed in Ordinance No. 171. The provisions of Section 38 (b) apply to this Sec. 43. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney . Nays: Bredesen First Reading granted. LIQUOR FUND REPORT as of December 31, 1984, was presented, reviewed and ordered placed on file by motion of Member Kelly, seconded by Member Richards. .Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Richards for payment of the following claims as per Pre -List dated 3/18/85: General Fund $267,307.77, Art Center $7,005.34, Golf Course Fund $15,525.98, Recreation Center Fund $1,939.28, Utility Fund $6,561.93, Liquor Dispensary Fund $71,665.67, Con- struction Fund $5,953.50, To.tal $375,959.47 and for confirmation of payment of the following claims dated 3/4/85: General Fund $37,946.31, Art Center $246.32, Golf Course Fund $2.53, Recreation Center Fund $637.41, Utility Fund $19,964.00, Liquor Dispensary Fund $282.92, Construction Fund $360.00, Total $59,439.49 Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. There being no further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting adjourned at 10:10 p.m. It City Clerk Nor Ilium 0 _.sl1 r t i + f r Y �• f �' _ ��txjF• Z t Z a i r y { Nr� • ` x Y s� 1 S!•is.'_ 7t'•C.y `r-yT a r''�'iV •i. y,.r � e�. ilk. •�i -'. �= r . .,, 'NS �-, � ��'i _ Y "��'� t,�+t�:; �)-• . "ice . v 4� i�,�. r ��' ,; � ."''. lax }; ��• � .s,: � :,. - " � ,� N`tr+ -.• �' Zt' � � t - r.K-i� REZONING NUMBER Z-84 -4 Brutger Co, L' O C A T 10 N Generally located west of Cahill Road and south of Dewey Hill Road REQUEST EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT WARDWELL'�•':.: 49 P ARK HA w r t i + f r Y �• f �' _ ��txjF• Z t Z a i r y { Nr� • ` x Y s� 1 S!•is.'_ 7t'•C.y `r-yT a r''�'iV •i. y,.r � e�. ilk. •�i -'. �= r . .,, 'NS �-, � ��'i _ Y "��'� t,�+t�:; �)-• . "ice . v 4� i�,�. r ��' ,; � ."''. lax }; ��• � .s,: � :,. - " � ,� N`tr+ -.• �' Zt' � � t - r.K-i� REZONING NUMBER Z-84 -4 Brutger Co, L' O C A T 10 N Generally located west of Cahill Road and south of Dewey Hill Road REQUEST EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT r II. OLD BUSINESS; Z -84 -4 Brutger Co. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to V� PRD -3, Planned Residential District. X30 Generally located: West of Cahill Road and South of �. Dewey Hill Road Mr. Larsen reported that the subject request was heard by the Commission at its January 2, 1985, meeting. The request was tabled pending submission of revised plans by the developer. The proponent has returned with a site plan illustrating 26 townhouse units and 24 condominium units on the 5.14 acre site. There are seven building's containing between four and eight units. Townhouse and condominium units are mixed in all but the four -unit building which is all townhouses. The proposal complies with all requirements of the PRD -3 District. Mr. Larsen stated total unit count on the revised site plan has been reduced from 60 to 50 which reduces the density to 9.73 dwelling units per acre. Building coverage which was 29.2 percent has been reduced to 21.25 percent. Enclosed parking is provided at a ratio of two per townhouse and 1.5 per condominium unit. The plan also illustrates 24 surface parking spaces. The proposed floor plans exceed zoning ordinance size minimums for two and three bedroom units. The exterior treatment of brick with lap siding remains from the original proposal. However, all units are now proposed at two stories. Units with tuck -under garages are no longer proposed. He explained Staff believes that the proponents have submitted a plan that responds to criticisms of the original plan. The crowding of the site has been greatly reduced. The new plan provides improved spacing between buildings and allows a more open feeling for the project. The new site plan also reduces the amount of black top on the site, provides guest parking throughout the site, and improves site access for emergency vehicles. Therefore, he recommended approval of preliminary rezoning to PRD -3 with the following conditions: 1. Final zoning is conditioned on final plat. 2. Developer's agreement. 3. Subdivision dedication. Mr. Steve Wilson, Brutger Company, presented graphics illustrating the revised building layout which avoided the "wall effect ". The design was such that each living area faces green area for view. The cluster condominiums are proposed to better utilize the site. Mr. Wilson stated that Brutger Company has worked closely with the City Staff and added that the proposed density is less than that required by the Ordinances. He referred to an informational booklet distributed to each of the Commissioners by reviewing a comparison of two different cluster home areas. The proposed plan offers a variety of dwelling possibilities as well-as variety in the appearance of the units. Mr. Runyan questioned the contour of the site and the distance between the closest adjacent building. Mr. Wilson explained from the northwest to southeast, there was approximately a ten foot drop. The building closest to a Dewey Hill Condominium was 80 - 90 feet. This met the required setback. Mr. Del Johnson asked what the comparison of blacktop was to that of Dewey Hill's. It was noted that the proposed site was 20% blacktop. Mr. Mel Gittleman, Gittleman Corporation and developer of Dewey Hill Condominiums, presented a graphic demonstrating the layout of a proposed third building of Dewey Hill Condominiums. He had hoped to acquire the proposed site to allow more room for this third building. However, once the third building is constructed on the Gittleman property , only 11% of the overall site will be building coverage. He stated that in comparison, this was one -half the amount of coverage proposed on the Brutger site. Mr. Gittleman argued that there appeared to be no relief in between the proposed buildings and believed that the setbacks were not adequate for the density. The residents at Dewey Hill would be forced to view a mass of roof tops and blacktop due to the topography difference. Dewey Hill Condominiums and Windwood Condominiums are attractive because of their openness. This should be preserved. He recommended that the Commission deny the proposal. Mr. Al Rahn, 5601 Dewey Hill petition in opposition of the the residents at Dewey Hill West. He Gittleman's arguments. Mr. Gittleman suggested that underground garages would be poss and more desirable. Road, #103, presented a proposal from the was in full support of Mr. a 40 unit building with ible for the proposed site Mr. Harley Pete, 5501 Dewey Road, #324, presented a petition from the residents of Dewey Hill East Condominiums. He objected to the cluster home idea mentioning Oak Glen as a comparison. He did not disapprove of the contractor only the proposal. He said a three story building with plenty of green area was desirable. Mr. Dave Kohner, President of Windwood Condominiums, stated that he sent out letters to the residents at Windwood Condominiums along with a proposed site plan asking for their reactions. Among the responses received some of the concerns were: * Buildings were located too close to property line. * Not enough open space. * Too closed in. * Too much blacktop and structure; not enough green area. * Opposed to cluster homes; prefer a three -story structure. * Creates more of a traffic flow problem. Mr. Kohner presented that the letters of response along with a petition of opposition from the residents of Windwood Condominiums. Mr. Robert Koch, 5501 Dewey Hill Road, stated that he faced the proposed site and objected its appearance, not the idea that it was being developed. He pointed out that many of the residents of Dewey Hill Condominiums were retired people and the view from their units was very important. He added that landscaping was just as.important. Mr. Al Lavin, 5501 Dewey Hill Road, #239, believed a three -story building should be constructed and that the proposed was out,of character for the area. Mr. Wally Johnson, Brutger Company, pointed out that Dewey Hill Condominiums appeared as much more massive structure for future residents of Brutger Company to view. He argued that the Dewey Hill residents would not be looking at roof tops because of the berming. In selecting a site for this project in Edina, there were few alternatives which allowed the ponds and extensive greenery which was being suggested. However, the proposal is suitable for the site and would appeal to a variety of different people. He stated that a traffic study had been done and had been considered in the project. The Ordinance standards and guidelines were also maintained for the site and the developers attempted to create the largest amount of green in between the neighboring buildings as possible. Mr. Joe Gust, 5501 Dewey Hill Road, commented that their living area appeared to be a park with homes tucked into it. Brugter's development would destroy this atmosphere. Mr. Wilson commented that the rooflines were staggered to break -up the monotony of a wall -like structure. Mr. Del Johnson asked Staff if the Commission could recommend rezoning and not approve the plans. Mr. Larsen informed him that rezoning could not be approved without specific plans. Mr. Johnson moved for denial of the rezoning. Mrs. McClelland seconded the motion because of her concern of the density in this area and in an attempt to maintain the integrity of the neighborhood as already established. Role was taken and the motion for denial carried. Mr. Runyan, Mr. Palmer and Mr. Gordon Johnson were nnnncAa COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 30, 1985 Z -84 -4 Brutger Companies _ R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -3, Planned Residential District Generally located: West of Cahill Road and South of Dewey Hill Road Refer to: Attached plans The subject request was heard by the Commission at its January 2, 1985, meeting. the request was tabled pending submission of revised plans by the developer. The proponent has returned with a site plan illustrating 26 townhouse units and 24 condominium units on the 5.14 acre site. There are seven building's containing between four and eight units. Townhouse and condominium units are mixed in all but the four -unit building which is all townhouses. The proposal complies with all requirements of the PRD -3 district. The revised site plan differs significantly from the initial submital. Total unit count has been reduced from 60 to 50 which reduces the density to 9.73 dwelling units per acre. Building coverage which was 29.2 percent has been reduced to 21.25 percent. Enclosed parking is provided at a ratio of two per townhouse and 1.5 per condominium unit. The plan also illustrates 24 surface parking spaces. The proposed floor plans exceed zoning ordinance size minimums for two and three bedroom units. The exterior treatment of brick with lap siding remains from the original proposal. However, all units are now proposed at two stories. Units with tuck -under garages are no longer proposed. RECOMMENDATION Staff believes that the proponents have submitted a plan that responds well to our criticism of the original plan. 'The crowding of the site, which was our main criticism of the first plan, has been greatly reduced. The new plan provides improved spacing between buildings and allows a more open feeling for the project. The new site plan also reduces the amount of black top on the site, provides guest parking throughout the site, and improves site access for emergency vehicles. Staff recommends approval of preliminary rezoning to PRD -3 with the following conditions: 1. Final zoning is conditioned on final plat. 2. Developer's agreement. 3. Subdivision dedication. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 2, 1985 Z -84 -4 Brutger Companies R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -3, Planned Residential District Generally located: West of Cahill Road and South of Dewey Hill Road Refer to: Attached plans and data sheet The subject property measures approximately 5.1 acres in area and is zoned R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. The property is developed with a single dwelling and accessory structures which remain from the original farmstead. Dewey Hill Estates Condominiums are located immediately north and west of the subject site. Windwoods Condominiums are to the south and everything to the east is a developed Planned Industrial area. The Comprehensive Plan illustrates the site as suitable for "medium density residential" which has a density range of 6 -12 dwelling units per acre. Th applicant is requesting a rezoning of the property to PRD -3, Planned Residential District. A preliminary site plan illustrating 60 townhouse units in 7 buildings has been submitted by the proponent. The site plan consists of traditional two and three- story townhouses with tuck -under garages in buildings containing 8, 9, or 10 units. The proposal calls for 46 units with double garages and 14 units with single garages. The Zoning Ordinance requires that townhouses have no more than 8 units in a single building and that each unit must have a double garage. The applicant has indicated that 45 guest parking spaces will be provided but has not indicated where they would be located. The proposed 60 unit development represents a density of 11.67 dwelling units per acre according to Staff's calculation of the site area. This density falls within the density range allowed in the PRD -3 District. Most multi- family developments in the Cahill Road area are developed at between 7 and 12 dwelling units per acre. Recent apartment /condominium developments in the area have been built at 8 - 10 dwelling units per acre. The Findell townhouses near 70th and Cahill were approved at 7 units per acre and Oak Glen is developed at 12 units per acre. The proposed plan appears to conform to Zoning Ordinance requirements for building and parking setbacks, usable lot area, and building coverage. However, building coverage calculated at 29.2% is close to the maximum of 30% allowed in the PRD -3 District. It is not possible to determine from the materials submitted if the dwelling units would conform to the minimum size specified in the Zoning Ordinance. The Ordinance requires two - bedroom units to be at least 950 square feet and three - bedroom units to be at least 1,100 square feet. Recommendation: Staff feels that the proposed townhouse concept has merit on this site and would encourage the applicant to continue to develop the concept. The exterior design of units and the proposed building materials appear to be compatible with other good townhouse designs in the City. Staff does, however, have a number of criticisms of the proposal, some of which may be answered by a more detailed site plan. Our main concern is with building coverage on the site. The site is simply too crowded with buidlings and the buildings are too large. Staff believes that the site plan should be reworked with individual buildings containing no more than eight dwelling units. We hope this will result in a better arrangement of buildings, greater distance between buildings and less hard surface on the site. This should also result in a reduction of the density on the site to a point more compatible with other developments in the area. The issue of parking must also be addressed. All market rate townhouses in the City provide two enclosed spaces per unit. The location and number of:.9uest parking spaces should be shown on the site plan. The proponent has indicated a desire for the flexibility to make some of the units apartments rather than townhouses in order to provide parking at 1.25 per unit enclosed and .75 per unit exposed. Staff is unable to analyze this approach without more detailed plans. Staff recommends that the proposal be held over and that the Staff work with the applicant to address issues raised here. SITE DATA Cahill Road Project 7440 Cahill Road Edina, Minnesota PROJECT Multi - Family Housing for BRUTGER COMPANIES, INC. St. Cloud, Minnesota 56302 PROJECT NO. 84118 NUMBER OF UNITS 2 - Nine -Unit, Two -Story Buildings 18 Units 2 - Eight -Unit, Two -Story Buildings 16 Units 2 - Eight -Unit, Three -Story Buildings 16 Units 1 - Ten -Unit, Three -Story Building 10 Units Total: 60 Units UNIT MIX 48 - Two - Bedroom Units 12 - Three Bedroom Units PARKING Visitor Parking: In private drives and on private street. Space provided for 45 cars. Resident Parking: Attached double garages: 46 Units = 92 Cars Attached single garage: 14 Units = 14 Cars HEIGHT OF STRUCTURE SITE COVERAGE Three -Story Buildings: Two -Story Buildings: Two -Story Structures: Three -Story Structures: Total = 106 Cars 35' =0" to top roof ridge 25' -0" to top roof ridge 34,340 sq.ft. 30,940 sq.ft. DENSITY Site area is 5.56 acres including a 33' -0" easement. 60 Units s 5.56 Acres = 10.79 Units /Acre MATERIAL'S Brick and horizontal siding as shown on elevations. Concrete block foundations. Asphalt shingles for roofing. 828.2 i 1� J _fir^ i Multi- family Housing for Brutger Companies, Inc 7440 Cahill Road Edina, Minnesota 4915 ne l 25111 511.!1 -Ane OOhs, M­es01. $5416 612 922 6677 vYv lam— BgpJ 2qp e�c3 330./ • B34.9 835.. C 0 Z J Q 0 J ) 1 W ccL� 2 O1 Location Plan C411sOn MIOII.J Alc ",llc!_'e OJ li 3 !, l: s� Or. no . . . . . . . . . . .......... . . . . . . . . . . ........... ..... ... ..... ..... cJ ::. / j .......... .......... ............. .......... 0 to .......... .......... .......... .......... Multi- family Housing for Brutger Companies, Inc Site Plan 7440 Cahill Road Edina, Minnesota 6915 Weal 75111 Sueel AA—"POI.S. 554:6 612 r,22 0671 CAIISO- k4,-'-'J Partial Elevation of Two Story Building Multi- family Housing for Brutger Companies, Inc 7440 Cahill Road Edina, Minnesota Partial Elevation of Three Story Building Multi- family Housing for Brutger Companies, Inc 7440 Cahill Road Edina, Minnesota 4515 wear J.1h 5uee1 MrnnlsGGlif, Min....... 5 5+16 Er: 9'2 e .. '., W� „...n ,:rcr iec:..,e uJ 4q3 !, �.; C 4- 0555515028 01/28/85 ICS IPMRNCZ CSP MPS8 6029452604 MGM8 TORN SCOTTSDALE AZ 35 01 -28 0823P EST C CITY OF EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION WEST 50 ST EAST OF HWY 100 EDINA MN 55435 GENTLEMEN AS EDINA RESIDENTS AND TAXPAYERS WE WISH TO RAISE OUR OBJECTIONS To THE PROPOSED REZONING OF THE GREEN PROPERTY LOCATED ON CAHILL ROAD, SOUTH OF DEWEY HILL EAST CONDOMINIUMS HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 1 -30 -85 ` 7:30P.4 RUTH AND CHARLES E ALLUM 5501 OFWEY HILL RD EDINA MN 55435 20:26 EST MGMCOMP l C l.. R co rl (• cr ( *%-- \ N N Ln i.- TO REPLY BY MAILGRAM MESSAGE, SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR WESTER14 UNION'S TOLL - FREE PHONE NUMBERS wlndl��Od (aAlhy January 30, 1455 To: the Edina Planning Commission From= Dave Kohner,Windwood Homeowners Association Summary of comments regarding the Proposed Brutger Development 1) The number of units (townhouses, condominiums, and garages) as well as the proposed Parking lot„ driveways to support this number of units is viewed as too high In other words, thc= ratio of "covered" land to green(landscaped) area is too high. ) The addition of two :story units so close to the property line is viewed as having a detrimental effect of the units at Windwood that face in the direction of the development. 3) Given the nuimbers of cars involved in the development, and the already congested conditions on Cahill Road at peak traffic hours, there is great concern for the safety of those attempting to turn into Windwood from a northbound direction against southbound traffic, and those attempting to leave Windwood by exiting with a left turn heading north. In addition to the safety considerations, the inordinately long wait by those attempting the above mentioned manuvers should be considered. 4) The Proposed development would not be in keeping with the "flavor" of the neighborhood by mixing a sprawling, relatively low rise complex, in the midst of the three story, generously landscaped developments of Windwood and Dewey Hill. The contrast would be too striking for the relatively small area involved. 5) There is concern for the wildlife of the area, given the density of coverage of the development. 6) There is concern about the possible devaluation of Windwood units due to the proxmity of the proposed development to Windwood property. Please refer to the attached letters and petition Thank: you very much for your consideration. Scerely� _ Dave Fohner President, Windwood Homeowners Association ,7100 E,alrill C'Qad - adina, �,�Oinnesala �SS1f3S �62i January 30, 1c,85 Members of the Edina Planning Commission City Hall Edina, Illinois Re: Property on Cahill Road North of Windwood Dear Members of the Planning Commission: We are writing to protest the plans for development of the above property as proposed by Brutger Companies, for the following reasons: 1. There are too many units proposed for such a small area. 2. The proposed buildings would not be in keeping with the tone of the surrounding area. 3. All of the present condominiums in the area have underground garages and nicely landscaped lawns with very little asphalt. To put 112 parking spaces in surface parking would mean too much blacktop with very little room left for landscaping and would detract from the beauty of the existing areas. 4. The neighborhood is already overly polluted with that emanating from the present buildings and the industrial area across the street from us that runs from 70th street to 78th street. Traffic is heavy at carious hours durugg the day when people are going and returning from work in those buildings. 5. Traffic now is highly congested at the corner of 78th street and Cahill Road during rush hours and also at 78th and Bush Lake Road, where a long wait is required to get through the intersections. Adding 88 or more cars to this con- gestion would be unconscionable. The undersigned respectfully request that you vote "no" on the development of the project as it is now planned. Sincerely, Residents of Windwood, 7500,7510, and 7520 Cahill Road, Edina, Illinois Q I v r lam. 4LZ-A 7,0 D T1�1L- L�r�I✓\B. CL - CQi�1!i- i - _JJa.— c�r4�Sdcr _ �,%� Cc� ►•h . —_tP,� _i.5c nor ,wead, ,p ot emit l_r-o_ /�-M2 -4 W1P-- P��_ — �_kd__W��fl, - -- U)4, a rte, eov, J.2. c Pl 0. g r_aovvs ClUr- _ Ib lyn, _ - -- ! -- frud v7--w,, iO�l�nw� M As an owner - resident of Windwood, I voice my concerned opposition to the proposed Project to rezone the property along Cahill road , described as Project N9.84118. I selected Windwood as a living site, primarily because of its environmental beauty, and rural setting. Assets which cannot be measured in a dollar sense. To replace green open areas, a country setting, and esthetic views with squares of looming buildings of staggering proportions would a) serve to devalue my property, as well as the property of other Windwood property owners b) pose unknown traffic hazards c) destroy forever a diminishing wild -life area. 1iave : Based on yourcomments to me, I have refrained from emphasizing the negative aspects, such as density. " 1 O_A� Rose C. Dhein m d ai t RESIDENTIAUREAL ESTATE - Jan 28,1985 Pir Dave; Kohner, x-z ',President',' tt Windwood Homeowners Association ,. We, received notice of the projected units to'-be built north of.Windwood,, and find the'project, as it's presented to be absolutely against all'reson First ,�I`am of the opinion that, 'from past conversations with City Hall that the "density permitted was only seven units per, acre, thus thebiggest number.of units that could.-be erected would be 35 'or .36 r« If the35 orb figure , , _ i,s used as it should be then a better use of green area could be provided for Secondly, the traffic situation would .be unbearable'on. Cahill Road for this reason We now have these figures, o. look • y4 J at in the existing units, plus new ones being built' , pl 56,56,56,205,28,33, a].l with one or two cars per unit: tNow; add another 80 cars to this figure, the normal usage _ �,• s gure, _ -of Cahill by the occupants of the buildin g s on the east side, ,. use•` � � F �,>^ �- r „ � .., - . _ • � - and�we.have overx600 cars using this road each day = 1 err Where is it _going to end. The traffic noises and the.danger of too many oars using this road is prohibitive Formy.reasonsshown aboIJJhink the pro.Jectshould either be'eliminated completely,, grTGut downr'to the legal density size. Yf y ,. Sincerely yours, af;rx', Wm F ZiYeske 7520 Cahill Rd Unit'119 •t J'' l 3910 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 612/ 927 -7043 •. " „ 7 y y� r . - AZ y Qom.. lac, b �AAAA - I f -- --- --- -- ��� "ice! � - -'- - -- --- - - - - -- -- -- - - -- AA /I - • 4 i. I � ey g`j c ••i � 7440 CAHILL A CLUSTERED CONDOMINIUM HOUSING DEVELOPME14T 7440 CAHILL The proposed "7440 Cahill" development will consist of 50 clustered condominium units, in seven buildings. The buildings have been situated to utilize the natural, existing contours of the site while providing yard space behind each unit. The views from each home have been maximized by considering the location of existing and future structures on the adjacent properties. The development concept of the clustered condominium was selected so that; 1) The existing rolling topography could be utilized to provide an interesting landscape upon which several smaller buildings could be built, and 2) A wide range of market rate residential housing choices could be provided within a single housing development. Within a typical eight -unit building.:there will be four, one -level condominium units and four, two -story townhouse units ranging in size from 1,100 -1,400 square feet. The first floor condominiums will have the elderly empty- nester as its target market. The second floor condominiums may appeal to the same group, as well as to the single professional or working professional couple. The two -story townhouse units, in two and three bedroom units may have more appeal to a family with children, but would not exclude the working couple who prefers the character of a two -story home. The proposed development will provide more housing choices than would be typical in a single- housing -type development concept. In addition to the variety of unit types, another feature to be included is a basement area for all the units, including the condominiums. Providing space for a hobby or workshop area, a recreation room, protection from summer storms, or simply providing necessary additional storage is a requirement.many people seek to fulfill in selecting a home. The townhouse units will provide a two car attached garage with the security of a direct entrance into the units, in addition to the separate guest entry and entry court. Of the condominium units, half of them will have a two -car attached garage and the balance will have a one -car attached garage. The condominiums will also have their own separate, formal guest entry and entry court. 7440 Cahill Page Two Parking for guest vehicles will be in front of the unit's garage door, with 24 additional parking spaces located on the site. The well designed exterior of each building will be clad in brick and cedar, with undulating wall planes and roof lines providing interest and spacial relief.. The building, together with the professionally landscaped greenspace, will provide a housing development with high curb appeal. The interior of the units will offer fireplaces, vaulted ceilings, skylights, lofts, spacious living areas and clerestory windows. The emphasis will be placed on the interior /exterior design and the quality of materials in each unit in order to maintain the standard of excellence in housing for which Edina has come to be known. "7440 Cahill" will provide the City of Edina with a quality housing development, one that meets the needs and desires of today's market place. ARCHITECTURAL SITE DATA PROJECT PROJECT NO. 7440 CAH I LL A Housing Development for Brutger Companies, Inc. 84118 NUMBER OF UNITS 5 - Eight -Unit, Two -Story Buildings 1 - Six -Unit, Two -Story Building 1 - Four -Unit, Two -Story Building Total: UNIT MIX 19 - Two - Bedroom Townhomes 7 - Three - Bedroom Townhomes 17 - Two - Bedroom Condominiums 7 - Three - Bedroom Condominiums PARKING Visitor Surface Parking: 88 Spaces provided in private driveways. 24 Spaces provided in adjacent areas. 112 Total Parking Spaces 40 Units 6 Units 4 Units 50 Units Resident Parking: Attached double garage: 38 Units = 76 Cars Attached single garage: 12 Units = 12 Cars Total = 88 Cars HEIGHT OF STRUCTURE Two -Story Buildings: 25' -0" to top roof ridge SITE COVERAGE Townhomes (Including Garage) 26,000 sq.ft. Condominiums (including Garage) 21,600 sq.ft. Total 47,600 sq.ft. Building Coverage: 21.25% DENSITY Site area is 5.14 acres excluding a 33' -0" easement. 50 Units : 5.14 Acres = 9.73 Units /Acre MATERIALS Brick and horizontal siding as shown on elevations. Concrete block foundations. Asphalt shingles for roofing. Dated: December 21, 1984 Revised: January 2, 1985 January 22, 1985 W 840 830 O 8273 •' EJN 66 •834.9 84 830.9 828.2 ( 834.3 O ' O 850 835.8 • •835.3 B5 840 Q 37.3 ��l .•' '• `•.� 84/.9 � O • v � t 7440 Cahill Z 838.. -g 9 •843.7 W 840 �— O1► p 8, a BS 841. b 83/.8 —� 33;.8 c • 845.1 Q 836.3 841. / 842.3 • : 840 w O 840 V � \ 2 842. d'9 845.5 • \ 833.5 p 7440 Cahill A Housing Development for Brutger Companies, Inc 4915 West 35th Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 Locator Plan 612 9226677 Carlson Mjorud Architecture Ltd First Floor Townhome 7440 Cahill A Housing Development for Brutger Companies, Inc 4915 Weti1 35th Slreel Minneapolis. Minnesota 55416 612 922 6577 Unit Plans Mjorud Archileclure Lid a Second Floor Townhome 7440 Cahill A Housing Development for Brutger Companies, Inc Unit flans 4915 well 35 1n Street Mon no&polq, Minne sofa 55416 612 922 6677 Carlson Mlorud ArChdeoture Lid 09i'l P.- First Floor Condominium 7440 Cahill A Housing Development for Brutger Companies, .Inc 4915 West 35th Street Mmneapohs, Minnesota 55416 612 922 6677 Second Floor Condominium Unit Plans nrchileeture ltd J Dlyl I ISx IBS . l�vlv�q 1',YxYo _ � IGitLICn� �iD�2 12rsX 10� Memel IG'X 106 O Q l ,,4 ut-ilam Q O I 1 L First Floor Condominium 7440 Cahill A Housing Development for Brutger Companies, .Inc 4915 West 35th Street Mmneapohs, Minnesota 55416 612 922 6677 Second Floor Condominium Unit Plans nrchileeture ltd J LN TIM �WO C 90% . . . . . . . Partial tlevatic % r,, KlIff- MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE The 1980 Land Use Plan - City of Edina, shows the two primary areas within the city that have a medium density land use designation. These two areas have been highlighted on the accompanying Figure 1. These locations, at the intersection of Highways 18 and 62.; and along Cahill Road, are the only medium density residential districts which contain more than one development. Within these two medium density residential district there exists a mixture of apartments, condominiums, cluster homes and townhomes. The following is a list of developments and their classification at the Cahill Road Location (Figure 2): West Village of Edina - Townhomes High Pointe of Edina - Condominiums Oak Glen - Townhomes Braemer Oaks - Apartments La Chataignier - Condominiums Dewey Hill Estates - Condominiums Windwood - Condominiums Ponds of Edina (Proposed) - Apartments and Townhomes The other location, at the intersection of Highways 18 and 62, (See Figure 3), exhibits a similar mix of multifamily housing types: Londonderry Townhomes - Townhomes Manor Homes of Edina - Cluster Homes Edina West - Condominiums The Habitat - Townhomes Wellesly Place - Townhomes Fountain Woods - Apartments Converting to Condominiums Vernon Hills - Townhomes Locating cluster homes, condominiums, townhouses and apartments next to one another within a medium density residential district has been established as a common and accepted practice. It seems apparent the development of clustered condominiums at 7440 Cahill Road would be highly compatible given the historical precedent which has been set by the City of Edina with regard to medium density residential district land use. II ,4jp tea: N . 4 a y s - • \ ,.. .ter �'•e''$'v s. }:.mot �i ,4 , � .5¢ T��•�• iiiiiiiii Pill ,L Location Map 70th' STREET WEST VILLAGE RAQUETBALL OF EDINA ' - HIGH POINTE - NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL OAK GLEN BRAEMER OAKS LA CHATAIGNIER' PARK DEWEY' HILL' ROAD O a O J J_ DEWEY HILL ESTATES = a v BCI CONDOMINIUMS. PROPOSED WINDWOOD PONDS OF EDINA PROPOSED 78 INDUSTRIAL Figure -2 0 z Location Map LONDONDERRY TOWNHOMES MANOR HOMES OF EDINA EDINA WEST IABITAT FOUNTAIN WELLESLY PLACE VERNON HILLS CROSSTOWN' HWY, WOODS Figure -3 EDINA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OBJECTIVES CITY OF EDINA - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The following are Excerpts from the "Comprehensive Land Use Plan ": ousinq Element, P. 1 4 "The housing element contains two central themes. The first is the protection of the existing housing stock and residential neighborhoods. A second theme of the housing element is the development of policies and programs that will widen the range of housing choices available in the City. In order to maintain the City's population at stable levels and provide adequate housing choices for families in all stages of the life cycle, the City should adopt policies and implement programs to stimulate the development of housing in all price ranges." Housing Element, p. 8 Policy Plan: A. Market Rate. Housing 1. Objective: offer a wide range of market rate residential housing choice. Land Use Element, p. 19 J� Objective: In appropriate areas encourage the development of multi - family housing that offers a wide range of housing choice, density, and location while maintaining the overall high quality residential development in Edina. Policies: Provide density bonuses for medium density residential and high density residential developments to encourage excellence in site planning, building materials, inclusion of modest cost units, and inclusion - of assisted units. Restrict density re idential to a maximum of 12 DU /acre. J ( (� n j L,-( n ,S U Land Use Element, p. 25 Vacant lands in this area (Cahill and 70th St.) are generally characterized by severe environmental limitations such as slopes or poor soils.' Thus, multiple residential or clustered housing presents the most logical means of land utilization while protecting important resources. SITE CONTROL January 14, 1985 TO: Edina Planning Department Planning Commission and City Council Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 FROM: Foster A. Green 7440 Cahill Road Edina, MN RE: Land Purchase at 7440 Cahill Road A Purchase Agreement has been signed between Brutger Companies, Inc. and myself for the 5.15 acre parcel of land referenced above. This agreement was reached after severel months of discussion with Steve Wilson, a project manager for the company, to determine an approach to development that would best utilize the site while considering my best interests in the development and construction phases of the project. Brutger Companies, Inc. has impressed me with the quality of their existing developments, the professional way they do business, and the concern they have shown towards myself. I would also like to state that I have never made a commitment to sell my property to Melvin Gittleman, and in light of my existing Purchase Agreement with Brutger Companies, am not in a position to do so in the future. Sincerely, FOSTER A. GREEN BRUTGER COMPANIES INC. HISTORY & BACKGROUND MITTOM ��V" • ONE SUNWOOD DRIVE • BOX 399 • ST. CLOUD, MINNESOTA 56302 • TEL. 612/252 -6262 BRUTGER COMPANIES, INC. History and Background Brutger Companies, Inc. is one of the Midwest's foremost motel and housing developers. The firm is established, rapidly growing, aggressive, and has an excellent financial base and a solid reputation for getting things done. We are in twelve Midwest and Western states with our motel and housing development activities, and the list is growing. The firm was founded in 1954 as a residential development company, and within a few years, became one of the nation's largest odd lot builders. In 1966, the company entered the apartment development field, and has since developed and constructed over 5,000 multifamily and residential housing units for both our portfolio and for a large and diversified group of clients. A significant expansion was our entry into the hospitality I industry. With our Sunwood Inn, Thrifty Scot, and ScotWood motels, - - we- entered - - -a new market -area which -- h -as - -- been-very-rewarding in-terms - - I of growth and community relations. Today we have over 3,400 motel rooms, either completed or under construction, and a significant number of others in the planning stages. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION HISTORY OF BRUTGER COMPANIES, INC. KEY: APT - Apartment; SF - Single Family; DUP - Duplex; TH - Townhouse; OF - Office; CONDO - Condominium; CON. CTR. - Community Center Location CONVENTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS St. Louis Park, MN St. Louis Park, MN Eagan, MN North St. Paul, MN Brooklyn Center, MN Billings, MT Billings, MT St. St. St. St. St. St. Col St. St. St. St. St. St. St St. Cloud, MN Cloud, MN Cloud, MN Cloud, MN Cloud, MN Joseph, MN legeville, MN Cloud, MN Cloud, MN - Cloud, -MN Joseph, MN Cloud, MN Cloud, MN Cloud, MN Cloud, MN SECTION 8 ILeSueur, MN Elk River, MN Glenwood, MN Mason City, IA Int'1 Falls, MN I Flandreau, SD Units Type 1 2 3+ 100 APT 20 40 30 TH TH 8 20 20 132 APT 60 60 12 70 TH APT 40 30 72 TH 8 48 24 169 APT 39 26 TH 20 12 CONDO 25 48 66 APT 21 40 TH 6 38 APT 12 24 TH 2 36 TH 12 24 40 CONDO 6 22 12 1 OPPORTUNITY TRG. CTR. 20 CONDO 2 18 12 APT 4 8 30 DORM 30 7 PROTOTYPE 5 2 104 APT 60 44 8 APT 8 2.0 - - APT - .. 12 - - 8 - - - 8 APT 8 54 APT 12 36 8 12 APT 12 16 APT 16 32 DUP 11 21 24 TH 16 8 30 TH 22 8 36 TH 22 14 40 APT 40 36 APT 16- „ TH 8 12 16 APT 16 PROJECT HISTORY - PAGE 2 Location Units Type 1 2 3+ SECTION 8 (Cont.) Madison, SD 28 APT 24 TH 4 Vermillion, SD 28 APT 24 TH 4 Pierre, SD 60 APT 42 14 4 Ely, MN 42 APT 41 1 Blue Earth, MN 37 TH 5 26 6 Winner, SD 25 APT 25 Grand Marais, MN 31 APT 27 4 St. Cloud, MN 52 TH 10 32 10 Onariia , MN 33 APT 32 1 Pierz, MN 30 APT 27 3 Sauk Rapids, MN 91 TH 20 12 APT 58 1 Glenwood, MN 48 APT 42 6 SECTION 236 Minneapolis, MN 90 APT 61 29 St. Cloud, MN 84 APT 81 3 Minneapolis, MN 140 APT 24 49 27 I TH 16 24 - Glencoe, MN 39 APT .23 8 8 Int'l Falls, MN 60 APT 44 12 4 I St. Cloud, MN 86 APT 46 20 20 SECTION 221 (d) (3 ) Owatonna, MN 76 APT 64 8 4 Red Wing, MN 96 APT 72 16 8 I Northfield, MN 96 APT 72 16 8 Fergus Falls, MN 61 APT 34 16 8 Dawson, MN 36 APT 36 Little Falls, MN 124 DUP 12 APT 64 24 24 - - -- ------ - - - - -- - Milaca, MN 68 APT -- - -- - Morris, MN 88 APT 64 16 8 I Wheaton, MN 64 APT 56 4 4 St. Cloud, MN 108 APT 28 56 24 I SECTION 23 LEASED HOUSING I St. Cloud, MN 66 SF 2 64 MILITARY HOUSING Powell, WY 50 SF 2 DUP 26 I APT 22 PROJECT HISTORY - PAGE 3 Location Units Type 1 2 3+ 202 HUD /NON - PROFIT St. Cloud, MN 36 APT 18 18 I Cold Spring, MN 61 APT 58 3 I TURNKEY Fort Belknap, MT 24 SF 24 Itasca County, MN 40 APT 32 I TH 4 4 Tomah, WI 28 TH 12 16 New Ulm,. MN 50 DUP 2 6 SF 2 APT 38 2 Dakota County, MN 52 TH 26 26 1 OF Blue Earth Co., MN 75 DUP 22 14 SF 14 APT 25 I Cheyenne River, SD 57 DUP 6 SF 6 29 APT 8 4 4 Scott County, MN 16 TH 16 I Dakota County, MN 16 TH 16 Fort Berthold, ND 64 APT 58 6 Kickapoo, KS 75 SF 28 I DUP 20 24 TRIPLEX 3 1 COM. CTR. I Flandreau, SD 40 SF 7 33 Fort Peck, MT 50 SF 22 DUP 28 Nett Lake, MN 50 SF 50 I 1 FIRE HALL Fort Peck, MT '50 SF 22 DUP 28 I Nett Lake, MN 51 APT 4 -SF - -- 47 Fort Peck, MT 48 SF 48 Rosebud, SD 110 SF 110 Washburn, ND 52 APT 8 40 4 Lame Deer, MT 35 APT 35 Trenton, ND 20 SF 20 11 COM. CTR. Lower Brule, SD 33 SF 25 APT 8 I Trenton, ND 14 SF 14 Harlem, MT 25 SF 25 Harlem, MT 14. MISC. Cook, MN 24 APT 23 1 Rapid City, SD 203 APT 197 6 PROJECT HISTORY - PAGE 4 Location Units Type 1 2 3+ TURNKEY (Cont. ) Thrifty Scot 91 Thrifty Scot 41_ . ___ - - ___ _ _ _ __ Thrifty_ Scot Add_ i_t_ion Poplar, MT 81 SF Thrifty Scot 60 71 80 Thrifty Scot DUP 10 60 Thrifty Scot Nett Lake, MN 50 SF Thrifty Scot 60 50 Lindstrom, MN 30 APT 29 1 Thrifty Scot Crow Creek, SD 70 SF Thrifty Scot 7 63 Aberdeen, SD 100 APT 74 5 21 Duluth, MN 65 SF 10 55 Crosby, MN 60 SF 12 8 APT 25 15 Albert Lea, MN 50 SF 20 30 I MISCELLANEOUS COMMERCIAL PROJECTS Center City, MN Hazelden Renewal Center I Nett Lake, MN Addition to Medical Clinic Wadena, MN Addition to Wesley Hospital Willmar, MN Addition to Willmar Technical Institute I St. Cloud, MN Centennial Plaza Shopping Center SINGLE FAMILY HOME CONSTRUCTION Kings Park, 20 Lot Sub - division, St. Cloud, Minnesota Wapicada Village, 52 Lot Sub- division, St. Cloud, Minnesota. Five Hundred Custom -Built Homes on Scattered Lots in St.. Cloud Area. MOTEL DEVELOPMENT Motels Salt Lake City, UT Minot, ND Spokane, WA I North Kansas City, MO - - - -- Billings, - MT- - -- - - - - Helena, MT I Mpls /Bloomington Glendive, MT Fort Collins, CO Mpls /Golden Valley I Bemidji, MN Mpls /Brooklyn Center Casper, WY I Fond du Lac, WI Sioux Falls I -90, SD Fargo, ND Newton, IA Breckenridge, MN Manitowoc, WI Units Type 112 Thrifty Scot 83 Thrifty Scot 93 Thrifty Scot 91 Thrifty Scot 41_ . ___ - - ___ _ _ _ __ Thrifty_ Scot Add_ i_t_ion 98 Thrifty Scot 166 Thrifty Scot 60 Thrifty Scot 80 Thrifty Scot 103 Thrifty Scot 60 Thrifty Scot 104 Thrifty Scot 105 Thrifty Scot 60 Thrifty Scot 88 Thrifty Scot 100 Thrifty Scot 60 Thrifty Scot 28 ScotWood 82 Thrifty Scot MOTEL DEVELOPMENT (Cont.) Motels Omaha, NE Cloquet, MN Litchfield, MN Lincoln, NE Mason City, IA Winona, MN Billings, MT Pierre, SD Bozeman, MT Carlton, MN Sioux Falls, SD Washburn, ND Glenwood, MN St. Cloud, MN Duluth, MN Kalispell, MT Owatonna, MN Bismarck, ND Chisholm, MN Morris, MN Int'l Falls, MN Waite Park, MN Hibbing, MN Brainerd, MN Waite Park, MN Alexandria, MN Morris, MN St. Cloud, MN Morris, MN PROJECT HISTORY - PAGE 5' Units Type 85 Thrifty Scot 36 ScotWood 36 ScotWood 85 Thrifty Scot 60 Thrifty Scot 60 Thrifty Scot 80 Thrifty Scot 82 Thrifty Scot 80 Thrifty Scot 26 ScotWood 81 Thrifty Scot 26 ScotWood 34 ScotWood 140 Sunwood Inn 86 Thrifty Scot 61 Thrifty Scot 61 Thrifty Scot 112 Thrifty Scot 44 ScotWood 40 Sunwood Inn Annex 61 Thrifyt Scot 35 Thrifty Scot Annex .101 Thrifty Scot 61 - Thrifty Scot 61 Thrifty Scot 61 Thrifty Scot 1 Sunwood Inn-Tavern Add .'� 48 Thrifty Scot 60 Sunwood Inn 4BWhere building begins with people'. responding to people's needs wherever they take us. a. t organization with a sound financial base, a solid reputation for fine work, and a creative approach to the future. Our growth has been planned, disciplined, and systematic, capitalizing on our expertise in the basic business of building quality housing. Our success in the past and our confidence in the future spring from the attitudes of the Brutger people. Special people. Talented, energetic, dedicated people. People who share our personal convictions that a truly great enterprise must be challenged, committed, and concerned. Challenged by new ideas and ventures. Committed to excellence. Concerned for the community and society. It's our style. It's our philosophy. It's taking time from business to serve on the local school board and to accept other civic responsibilities, to chair the commission responsible for Minnesota's new 65,000 seat dome stadium, to work the Montana ranches, to fish and hunt, to have friends, to be with our families. And it's the Brutger Companies, the Brutger people, and it's our story that follows. Dan J. Brutqer, Chairman of the Board Brutger Country Expanding our capabilities. . . broadening our geographic area Above is a map of Brutger Country today. We've come a long way, in terms of both geography and capabilities. And we're still growing. Our horizons are unlimited. Although it's impossible to draw an exact map of where Brutger Companies will be tomorrow, we do know this: we'll be building on our present successes. Continuing to innovate in new areas. And responding to people's needs . . . wherever they take us. (Working With People... Mountain Sky Guest Ranch i 1 S ! U-1 A challenging new venture in the hospitality industry. Mountain Sky Guest Ranch. A rich panorama of enjoyment. Horseback riding. Fishing in our own trout pond or one of the creeks that passes through the ranch. Tennis or a relaxing, quiet walk over scenic mountain trails. A year -round ranch. Guests can enjoy the fabulous colors of autumn, or cross - country skiing and other winter activities. No matter the season, the evenings are filled with tales of days well - spent. At Mountain Sky, Brutger Companies has developed a guest ranch which dates back to the 1800's. We've added amenities for our guests' comfort and increased their recreational choices, while maintaining a rustic splendor and the atmosphere of a by -gone era. lk IL f.. Architect's rendering of the Thrifty Scot Motel to be built in Minneapolis, Minnesota at 1 -494 and Hwy. 100 Thrifty Scot Motel during construction in Fort Collins, Colorado Thrifty Scot Motel's first high -rise located in Omaha. Nebraska Multi- Family Housing Mike Podawiltz, Vice President Marketing Families. The handicapped. The elderly. They all have special housing needs. And what's suitable for some may not be right for others. At Brutger Companies, we pay particular attention to individual needs. And we're sensitive to the communities we build in. The result — quality housing that's uniquely suited to the residents. And to the neighborhood. As one of the upper midwest's largest developers of government - assisted housing, we've already completed over 50 developments, with many more under way. We've also developed and built many private apartment complexes and single- family homes. But, in all our housing developments, we hold to one main philosophy: homes should be built for the people who live in them. At Brutger Companies, we build quality housing that accommodates people's needs. Sunwood Inns Noel Joyce, General Manager, Sunwood Inns We built the first Sunwood Inn in 1972, when the citizens of Morris, Minnesota recognized that they needed a full - service motel. We went on to operate it. The motel, the restaurant, the cocktail lounge, the convention center, the works. Then in 1977, we opened a new Sunwood Inn in St. Cloud, Minnesota. With 140 rooms and suites. One of Minnesota's finest restaurants, the Quarry Room. An indoor pool and sauna, 13 different meeting rooms and banquet facilities for 1,000. For conventions, conferences, banquets . . . it's a major center. With exceptional facilities to assure successful meetings. Sunwood's design is flexible too. Accommodating any size group, large or small. r �, Newsweek Because it's just a motel and that's just exactly Sports Illustrated what want. am.... ..a- �,b..n.. ITIME .. m nobN accommona om lon per.. u.Iw1.M, r. wn�a OuNt n�pnr. Win, ]L110Y1 tmnt GfY N [ 0� v, oM a 1� conlNrnta� naRNtt LM �oN. o • npnl Wcau>A .. non', PoY ..in - o� iM .:mbi r. tlonY rr.n U.S.News "°° °°°� " "•'""'"��H.�n &WORLD REPORT AS SEEN IN Ogg •. i � v .r; I l / b' Brutger Companies 9 Jerry Severson, President The Brutger Companies. A leader in housing development. A leader in quality construction of government- assisted housing for senior citizens and the handicapped, for Indian reservations and for families in apartments in cities and towns across Mid - America. And we have expanded our capabilities and broadened our geographic work area to include the closely- related hospitality and condominium housing industries. Our Sunwood Inns, Thrifty Scot and ScotWood Motels now span the entire Midwest and Northwest, providing exceptional accommodations for travelers. Mountain Sky Guest Ranch in the Montana Rockies adds an exciting dimension to our hospitality program. Northcrest in St. Cloud is a major thrust into condominium housing. At Brutger Companies, construction is our business. We do it well, with superior craftsmanship and good, solid materials. Yet, we recognize that construction begins with people. Their needs and their preferences. The basics done well. When people need housing, Brutger responds with quality construction. Motel Development Gary Nelson. Executive Vice President As one of the leading motel developers in the Upper Midwest, Brutger Companies is proud. Proud of our growth. Proud of our track record. Our accomplishments are a result of two sterling qualities: competent management and superior construction, which insure quality in every aspect of our business. And which is why Sunwood Inns, Thrifty Scot and ScotWood Motels are solidly constructed of brick and mortar, with reinforced concrete floors and ceilings. The decor? Simple and attractive. That's good for both the owner and guests because it's affordable, easily maintained, and profitable. And our Thrifty Scot Motels are growing. We've projected many more within the next few years. Of course, the locations all meet specific criteria, and will continue to do so. Each Thrifty Scot is part of a network connecting guests from one Thrifty Scot Motel to another. Brutger Companies maintains this proximity among locations to enhance Thrifty Scot Motel's strong name identification. We started out building single- family houses in St. Cloud. Now, we're operating a whole system of quality motels, responding to the needs of all types of travelers. For travelers who want the basics done well — Thrifty Scot. For travelers to small communities— Scot Wood. And for travelers who desire the finest luxury accommodations and convention facilities —Sun wood. Thrifty Scot Motels Eric Thomas, Vice President Operations, Thrifty Scot Motels, Inc. Thrifty Scot's skillful management is evident in all phases of motel operations. This management is composed of exceptionally qualified people who use their extensive experience to operate a successful, growing, economy motel system. Live -in motel managers, field representatives, and specialists at corporate headquarters all use a complete set of proven management tools to insure successful operation of every Thrifty Scot Motel. Thrifty Scot means a top quality room, at a reasonable price, with added amenities such as: color TV, 24 -hour desk service, and a free continental breakfast for each guest. "The Basics Done Well. " A clean, comfortable room and friendly faces. That's us, Thrifty Scot. Construction Richard Schreilels, Vice President Construction At Brutger Companies, we build to meet people's needs. Accomplishing that requires quality construction. In our building materials. In our experienced crews. In our choice of land sites. We combine all the right ingredients that produce good, solid, beautiful buildings. From homes to apartment complexes, to full- service motels. And we draw from the expertise of the area in which we're working. That's why we're still growing. We're constantly searching out new sites. The right sites. To put up more buildings to meet people's needs. At Brutger Companies, we never skimp on quality. And our buildings show it. IMF 7k. ^ `\ Brutger People 14, 1 .t Indian Reservation Housing Community Center at Northern Cheyenne. Lame Deer. Montana Striking architectural design compliments the wooded scenery in Nett Lake, Minnesota As in all of our construction, when we build Indian Reservation housing, how we build is as important as what we build. At Brutger Companies, we're more than just general contractors. We respond to the owners' needs during the entire building process, as well as in the final product. It takes teamwork. The Housing Authority makes the decisions. We coordinate the activities of the H.A. and other parties: architects, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and future occupants. It means working with local residents and contractors whenever possible. Providing minorities with on- the -job training in the building trades: masonry, carpentry, plumbing, and more. Keeping the construction dollars in the community. And, of course, it means quality housing. Housing that's built to last. We construct reservation housing that meets the needs of today, and will continue to do so for generations to come. Condominiums Architect's rendering of Northcrest Condominium Townhomes, St. Cloud, Minnesota We, at Brutger Companies, have again proven our awareness of people's housing needs by expanding our construction vistas to- include condominium townhomes. Northcrest Condominium Townhomes, our first condominium complex, are right here at home . . . in St. Cloud. This phase in our building career meets the needs of smaller families, singles, career people . . . people who want comfortable, convenient, maintenance -free living. These custom townhomes have the buyer's personal taste reflected in the color schemes, appliances, and fixtures. To allow time for valuable leisure activities, the exterior of the buildings and the grounds are maintained by an experienced team: snow removal, lawn grooming, the full spectrum of outdoor chores. And Northcrest means all of the benefits of home ownership, including attractive financing plans. We, at Brutger Companies, feel it's our way of providing comfortable, affordable living. An excellent investment . . . a unique, modern life style. 2100 Bloomington, Minneapolis, Minnesota ­,t , ­,wt, Mtv barrier -tree apartment complex built in the State of Minnesota 1TI.i;. Russell Arms Apartments for the elderly, Sauk Rapids, Minnesota Opportunity Manor, St. Cloud, Minnesota, St. Cloud's finest group home for the mentally retarded BRBTGER conies no!!! UNWOOD DRIVE • BOX NO. 399 • ST. CLOUD, MINNESOTA 56302 • TEL. 612/252 -6262 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER PETITION FOR ZONE CHANGE Case Number 2--13q- 4 Date ;L1- gq Fee Date Paid Applicant Brutger Companies, Inc. _ Phone 612/252 -6262 Address One Sunwood Drive, P.O. Box 399, St. C1oud,MN zip 56302 Status of Applicant: (Owner, Buyer, Lessee, etc.) Buyer Legal Description: The East 440 Feet of the South 550 feet of th 30 acres of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 8, Township 116, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the U.S. Government Survey. Street Address: 794n rill Road Presently zoned: R -1 Change to: PRD -3 Reasons for Request for Rezoning:.- 1. To allow the development of 60 units of townhomes and condomin- iums 2. The PRD -3 zoning will be more in line with adjacent develo mn Pnts: 3. BRUTGER COMPANIES, INC. Signature of Applicant Steve Wilson Project Manager Y7 -A Mrs. Karl E. Sandt 5601 Dewey Hill Rd., Apt. 212, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 /� `��lJ- �i:J•LYLGI �� ��� U yV lj(ti!'is�� U i �� 1 iLd `(i!_.cL �•`Z,i��.G�i � .���G -G.L G��� G[/J GL�Iw� �+..c -� �- �. Yi 7s<- r� -rL�r ,G � �2,'•'_�✓ 611 -10 ,� X-C January 26, 1985 PETITION We, the undersigned, as owners of condominium units at Dewey Hill East, 5501 Dewey Hill Road, Edina, Minnesota, respectfully.urge the City of Edina Planning Commission and City Council not to recommend and /or'grant approval of the Brutger Company's pending proposal for rezoning of the Green property located along Cahill Road between Dewey Hill East and Windwood Condominiums. We strongly oppose the proposed development -on the basis of relative high density, high percentage of building and blacktop coverage in relation to the overall and, most importantly, that the structure would be out of scale with the three storied buildings that will be on three sides of the proposed development. When we purchased our homes at Dewey Hill it was expected that the Green property would be developed in a manner compatible with the surroundings. We would expect that the open, park -like setting inherent in both Dewey Hill and Windwood be maintained throughout this quadrant of Edina. Your thoughtful consideration is appreciated. NAM E UNIT 33 .3 `7 3�3 � .� 3 �- -IS Page 2 Dewey Hill East Petition January 26, 1985 -UNIT f3� 130 ,�,11 ,;2 30 �a a K6 J Z January 26, 1985 PETITION We the undersigned, as condominium owners at Dewey Hill West, 5601 Dewey Hill Road, Edina, Minnesota, respectfully urge the City of Edina Planning Commission and City Council not to recommend and /or grant approval of the Brutger Company's pending proposal for rezoning of the Green property. This Green property being located on Cahill Road between Dewey Hill East and Windwood Condominiums. We strongly oppose this proposed development on the basis of the relative high density, high percentage of building and blacktop coverage and the disproportionate scale this structure will present to the surrounding three storied buildings.- As residents of Dewey Hill we expect the Green property to be developed in a manner compatible with the surroundings. We would expect the open, park -like setting inherent in both Dewey Hill and Windwood to be maintained throughout this quadrant of Edina. Your thoughtful consideration is appreciated. y.. • Wiz.. eC'C., fCi' (� C...C. C" —[..2_ 4/ UNIT 1o,3 I/;) V Z// /1 `7 1/ Y a• ,2 Page 2 Dewey Hill West Petition January 26, 1985 NAME /,V UNIT I /) X'Z-7 3 C, 2 30T R -, 3 '31 sz� :31 Iz C) Page 3 Dewey Hill West Petition January 26, 1985 NAME .rte i k-e Ar Ada, IhO99A& ,s UNIT � f a� 0 O 2: I � cwl)ldl;q�^od 6aAWT April 1, 1985 To: The Edina City Council From: Dave Kohner, President, Windmood Homeowners Association Re: Proposed 8rutger Townhouse Development I mould like if I may to summarize the "feelings" of Windmood residents on the proposed Drutger development. On January 24th a letter was sent by myself to all Windmood residents explaining the proposed 8rutger townhouse development and asking for any input from them about the project, so that I could represent their wishes to the Edina Planning Commission at it's January 30 meeting. Since that time I have received comments verbally, in writing and by petition. The unanimous concensus has been opposed to the project. I think that two points should be highlighted: 1> Although no door to door solicitation was done we have heard either by letter, petition, or'vote from residents representing 58 OF WINDW00D`S 203 UNITS - NEARLY A 30% REPRESENTATION - ALL OPPOSED. 2) At it's regular meeting on February 20, 1985 WINDW00D`S BOARD OF DIRECTORS based on inputs that they had heard from residents VOTED UNANIMOUSLY T0 G0 ON RECORD IN OPPOSITION to the development as proposed by 8rutger Companies, for the reasons outlined below. These points are a summary of resident's concerns about the project, as determined from letters and conversations. Summary of Comments Regarding the Proposed 8rutger Development A) The number of units (townhouses, condominiums, and garages) as well as the proposed parking lots and driveways to support this number of units is viewed as too high In other words, the ratio of "covered" land to green(landscaped) area is too high. B) Given the numbers of cars involved in the development, and the already congested conditions on Cahill Road at peak traffic hours, there is great concern for the safety of those attempting to turn into Windmood from a northbound direction against southbound traffic, and those attempting to leave Windmood by exiting with a left turn heading north. In addition to the safety considerations, the inordinately long wait by those attempting the above mentioned maneuvers should be considered. C) The addition of a two story structure so close to the property line is viewed as having a detrimental effect on the units at Windmood that face in the direction of the development. D) The Proposed development mould not be in keeping with the "flavor" of the neighborhood by mixing a sprawling, relatively low rise complex in the midst of the three story, generously landscaped developments of Windmood and Dewey Hill. The contrast mould be too striking for the relatively small area involved. E) There is concern for the wildlife of the area, given the density of coverage of the development. F> There is concern about the possible devaluation of Windmood units due to the proxmity of the proposed development to Windmood property. I mould like to stress that Windmood is not opposed to any development of the propertw, simply this specific plan for the reasons outlined above. For further documentation please refer to the attached letters and petitions. (Note that some names are duplicated between petitions. They are only counted one time in the figures mentioned above.) Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, 4UA- X444ol., Dave Kohner President, Windmood Homeowners Association U14IT # c -2 D1/ 0 IN REGARDS TO THE PROPERTY NORTH OF WINDWOOD AND KNOWN AS THE FOSTER GREEN AREA, WE THE.UNDERSIGNED VOTE AS FOLLOWS: THE PROPOSAL AS PRESENTED BY THE BRUTGER COMPANIES NAME ADDRESS rAGA:INST Z.0 �.�.._ ..._ . ..___... �....... ��..� � cis C. . o l,3 1611"- rLl 0` n V9all r ./I r_. X. FOR U;li IT # 11,10 IN REGARDS TO THE PROPERTY NORTH OF WINDWOOD AND KNOWN AS THE FOSTER GREEN AREA, WE THE UNDERSIGNED VOTE AS FOLLOWS: THE PROPOSAL AS PRESENTED BY THE AMTMC-COM] NAME ADDRESS zD r I FOR • January 30, 1985 Members of the Edina Planning Commission City Hall Edina, Illinois Re: Property on Cahill Road North of Windwood Dear Members of the Planning Commission: We are writing to protest the plans for development of the above property as proposed by Brutger Companies, for the following reasons: 1. There are too many units proposed for such a small area. 2. The proposed buildings would not be in keeping with the tone of the surrounding area. 3. All of the present condominiums in the area have underground garages and nicely landscaped lawns with very little asphalt. To put 112 parking spaces in surface parking would mean too much blacktop with very little room left for landscaping and would detract from the beauty of the existing areas. 4. The neighborhood is already overly polluted with that emanating from, the present buildings and the industrial area across the street from us that runs from 70th street to 78th street. Traffic is heavy at carious hours during the day . when people are going and returning from work in those buildings. 5. Traffic now is highly congested at the corner of 78th street and Cahill Road during rush hours and also at 78th and Bush Lake Road, where a long wait is reghired to get through the intersections. Adding 88 or more'cars to this con- gestion would be unconscionable. The undersigned respectfully request that you vote "no" on the development of the project as it is now planned. Sincerely, Residents of Windwood, 750097510, and 7520 Cahill Road, Bdina, Illinois rr i L JOSEPH M. WALKER 7520 CAHILL ROAD - NO. 306 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 March 14, 1985 Mr. Dave Kohner, President Win dwood Homeowners Association 7500 Cahill Road Edina, MN 55435 Dear Dave: This letter will confirm my previous discussion with you relative to my concern regarding the proposed Brutger Development on the tract of land immediately adjacent to the north side of the Windwood complex. At this point, I am not certain as to my availability to attend the City Council Meeting on Monday, March 25th, but will do so if at all possible. Please communicate on our behalf my wife's and my opposition to the rezoning request. This opposition emanates from our concern that esthetically the proposed construction would not be acceptable since it would introduce, into an area of three - story structures, a multi - family complex of significantly different physical dimensions. In addition, we are opposed to the rezoning since there currently are problems in terms of traffic flow and safety on Cahill Road. The introduction of a complex who's only egress is to Cahill Road would greatly increase traffic problems on Cahill. It would result in two new drives within oneblock of Windwood's north drive and greatly increase the traffic hazards in the area. Unless the foregoing problems have been dealt with revised plans, we are unalterably opposed to the rezoning request and respectfully request the Edina City Council to deny same. Vry.,\ru1.), Yo,Lf'r_S, �\ �l Josep and Je, n M. Walker JMW /db j bra .J! 'f. 1 i yr ,.. t 1. BERMQZ -SMIT Jan 28,1985 Mr Dave Kohner, President, Windwood Homeowners Association We received notice of the projected units to be built north of Windwood, and find the project, as it's presented to be absolutely against all reason First, I am of the opinion that, from past conversations with City Hall that the density permitted was only seven units per acre, thus thebiggest number of units that could be erected would be 35 or 36. If the 35 or 36 figure is used, as it should be, then a better use of green area could be provided for. Secondly, the traffic situation would be unbearable on Cahill Road for this reason: We now have these figures to look at in the existing units, plus new ones being built. 56,56,56,205,28,33, all with one or two cars per unit. Now, add another 80 cars to this figure, plus the normal usage of Cahill by the occupants of the buildings on the east side, and we have over 600 cars using this road each day. l Where is it going to end. The traffic noises and the danger of too many cars using this road is prohibitive. For my reasonsshown above, I think the project should either be eliminated completely, or cut down to the legal density size. Sincerely yours, Wm F. Zieske 7520 Cahill Rd. Unit 119 3910 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 612/ 927 -7043 �.17 �CJ`- 1C -.E:i� �(�.. •,9. �GA./� 4II�rJ' l�/�L_vG•' / `...�/�i � " T �-' �L,��/ w i �'� AZT G L_�� -' D'.- �� -z-2_. �f = ' -�-`�� ilia- z,•2!! G< --�..� l.�L•.� -�,� -� � /� o -�'ivz rr,� I r� ©, l:.i � Coi•�V', f .�' � -- c" Cc.��r, (�� � I� � �� i ►� � [�r p Y'c � �2, r �v " u.,5 t AC4 �� Z`r L`7i+��wt}b� o:� C:c�h�ll. �c "o�. PC,l�u� We, are Vv_T%,.� �►�rJt,t'1��t� �1�ci'�" "� `� t`+' C j�Q` p�,t,Je.� D ►`►�- e,V'�� (�t!'�5 . Y;p�' �j l Ir. (�� l � uJ 1Ti� %_'oA• „, •r., W Clln �lVl. pro t'JGLI rGilCS� t'�� LJ�IIliC1� [�Y� 51/.C�r1 - -�:ti�, Itti. d.J� 1 �� ►�- ���_�.- P�- �PI'�lY ,,.off V.,�ir•L�lv3L� Y�t� ir'Z I L” C►.SK -�' * C4i6L. wrP i.tlI, � p, l I�J�t" j�21 o �� r 0 �l:a� . � h � yew ai- �rCv -v- cov\SiC "v'cL "Ep /CAi .554495 se— gyp. y /lc 1 4.0— -1yov led 7 7 41 ?,J C C- As an owner- resident of Windwood, I voice my concerned opposition to the proposed Project to rezone the property along; Cahill road , described as Project N4.84118. I selected Windwood as a living site, primarily because of its environmental beauty, and rural setting. Assets which cannot be measured in a dollar sense. To .replace green d.pen areas, a country setting, and esthetic views with squares of looming buildings of staggering proportions would a) serve to devalue my property, as well as the property of other Windwood property owners b) pose unknown traffic hazards c) destroy forever a diminishing wild -"life area. Dave: Rased on your comments from emphasizing the as density. Rose C. Dhein I (' I - V') 5' Ii to me, I have refrained negative aspects, such .�� /y+� -el IL Cwinnik/od January 24, 1985 Dear Windmood Homeowner, As many of you may have noticed in the past few weeks, the property to the immediate north of Windmoo& along Cahill road has been proposed for rezoning. The Property consists of approximately 5.5 acres on which currently stand the barn and home of Foster Green. The matter initially came before the Edina Planning Commission on January 2,1985. At that time the commission expressed concern about the density of the project, placement of the buildings and the low percentage of landscaped areas. The matter was tabled. The developer (Brutger Companies) has since revised the Project plans to address the commission's concerns, and attached to this letter you will find a copy of those revised plans. In summary, the plan calls for the construction of 50 units consisting of a mixture of two and three bedroom townhouse and condominiun units two stories in height. A combination of single and double garages mould house 88 cars, and visitor parking mould be provided for 112 cars. Since we have Just received a copy of the proposed plan your Board of Directors has not had the opportunity to take a position on this proposal. I have been in touch with Mr. Gittleman, the developer and managing agent of the Dewey Hill Condominium project also adjoining the property. Gittleman Corporation is strongly opposed to the project on the basis of �density (too many units for the siz. of the �uite�,amd a high peroentage of buildings and blacktop in comparision to open green areas. I mould ask all of gou to review the attached plans, and if you have an opinion on the proposal to let it be known. Either submit your thoughts in writing to the management office, so that we can pass them on, or if possible I mould urpe yoU to attend the Edina Planning Commission meeting on WEDNESDAY EVENING, JANUARY 30 at 7:30 PM at EDINA CITY HALL. . Thank you for your concern and developments. Sincerely, Dave Kohner President, Windmood Homeowners Association we ill keep you informed of future // �� m/ a���� 1'� ���� rT-VL 507 411 A k ' `1. -�- ���r_ ���� y�> - ��u/ ~-- ^�/) a�^�f /c�"�7��� "~'- ' ^ <�' ' ^ ' ~ f V ^ ' 2-Y 7 0 F 3^ 1 2~�1 _^ ~ = _~_ ~V z.D LOCATION MAP M TODD. PAIR!( _.... W ab'r: ST. f•)•1 .� Ilk NUMBER Z -85 -1 Woodhaven EOINA I PUBLIC WORKS I CENTER IL own a �rF wOOCw��' z 3 MILL CI� Li HALL a PUBLIC Pnl ICELfBRa � �` DEPT. , y L� J 1 it E DI NA L O C A T 10 N Generally located south of Interlachen Boulevard, west of Summit Avenue and north of Vernon Avenue REQUEST R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PSR -4, Planned Senior Residence District EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT Z -85 -1 Woodhaven. Lots 3, 4, & 5, Block 4, Grandview Heights. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PSR -4, Planned Senior Residence District. Generally located: South of Interlachen Boulevard, west of Summit Avenue and north of Vernon Avenue Mr. Hughes stated that the subject property measures 32,500 square feet in area and is composed of three developed single family lots. The Commission and Council reviewed a rezoning request for this property on several occasions i-n 1983 and 1984 which proposed eight townhouse units. These units were to be an extension of the townhouse project which had been constructed at the corner of Summit and Interlachen. The Council approved a rezoning to PRD -3 on March 19, 1984, for this project, however, the plat for the property was not completed and construction has not and apparently will not commence. The subject property has now been optioned by Westminster Corporation for the purpose of constructing a senior citizen residence. A rezoning of the property to PSR -4, Planned Senior Residence is requested. A three -story building is proposed which would house 28 senior citizen units and one.caretaker unit. As with the previous townhouse plan, the applicant proposes the vacation of Summit Avenue and the inclusion of the vacated right of way into the site. Access to the site will be maintained both to Interlachen Boulevard as well as Vernon Avenue to alleviate the site distance problems associated with the Summit and Interlachen intersection. Mr. Hughes noted that building setback requirements are somewhat unusual in this case in that the lot does not front on a public street in the traditional sense. Staff has suggested that the east side of the building should be considered the front yard and the west side should be considered the rear yard. Thirty -five foot setbacks are required and have been provided except that the northwesterly corner of the building maintains 32 feet. The north and south sides of the building should be considered interior side yards which require 20 foot setbacks as have been provided. Building height was a concern expressed by property owners to the west in regard to the prior townhouse plan. This concern will likely be raised again, especially since the proposed building is a full three stories in height rather than two and one -half stories as were the townhouses. Although a final grading plan has not been produced, the first floor elevation of the proposed building will be lower than the townhouses that were proposed. As a result, it appears that the proposed building will be no taller than the townhouses which were approved for the site. He stated that Staff believes that the subject property is an excellent site for senior citizen housing due to its .proximity to necessary services while enjoying a residential setting. The Comprehensive Plan includes the Grandview Area as. _.a general location for assisted elderly housing and notes that elderly housing should be encouraged in areas designated as low or medium density residential where essential support services are available. The vacation of Summit Avenue is still appropriate in Staff's opinion. Some aspects of the proposal do not conform with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. In short, the building contains one too many units. However, it is questionable that the deletion of one unit provides any benefits to the development. Mr. Hughes recommended preliminary rezoning approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Vacation of Summit Avenue. Cross easements and maintenance agreements with the townhouses to the north will have to be resolved prior to final approval. 2. Acceptable overall development plans. We will be particularly concerned with the landscape treatment along the westerly lot line to provide a suitable buffer for the single family homes to the west. 3. Final .platting 4. Subdivision dedication 5. Developers Agreement 6. Redevelopment contract with the Edina HRA John Rocheford, Jan Blessner and Jim Curry, representing the applicants, were present. Mr. Rocheford told the Commission that South Haven displayed a fine example of their previous development in connection with the Edina Community Lutheran Church. Now he would be working with the Edina Miniterial Association relative to Woodhaven and a group of Edina Churches would be the sponsors. Mrs. McClelland asked why Summit Avenue was being vacated. Mr. Hughes explained that it was desirable to eleiminate Summit as a shortcut and redirect traffic to the Vernon /Interlachen instersection. He also noted buildings require greater setbacks from public streets. Mr. Curry, St. Stephens Church, reported that he was part of a lay committee and spoke on their behalf. There were few sites left in Edina for elderly housing. He commented that the ministry was excited for such an_ opportunity explaining that the price was right in addition to the location. 1. Mr. Marvin Huiros, 5052 Hankerson Avenue, stated that the neighbors hoped for total screening from the proposed building and Ms. Blessner was in agreement. He also questioned the height and the exterior materials. He was told that this project was smaller than the previous proposal. Mr. Rocheford pointed out that elderly housing generated very little-traffic or activity. Ms. Blessner stated that the hill would be shaved down in order to make the project as low as possible. The exterior consists of wood framing with brick veneer finishing. Mrs. McClelland asked about the handicapped units. Ms. Blessner reported that five percent of the units were designed for handicapped and five percent for semi - handicapped. One unit would be reserved for the caretaker. The units would be leased on a need basis. The applicant must qualify. Mr. Palmer moved for approval subject to the conditions noted in the Staff Report. Mrs. McClelland seconded the motion. All were in favor; the motion carried. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 27, 1985 Z -85 -1 Woodhaven. Lots 3, 4, & 5, Block 4, Grandview Heights. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PSR -4, Planned Senior Residence District. Refer to: Attached preliminary development plan; February 1, 1984, Staff Report Generally located: South of Interlachen Boulevard, west of Summit Avenue and North of Vernon Avenue The subject property measures 32,500 square feet in area and is composed of three developed single family lots. The Commission and Council reviewed a rezoning request for this property on several occasions in 1983 and 1984 which proposed eight townhouse units. These units were to be an extension of the townhouse project which had been constructed at the corner of Summit and,_Interlachen. The Council approved a rezoning to PRD -3 on March 19, 1984, for this project, however, the plat for the property was not completed and construction has not and apparently will not commence. The subject property has now been optioned by Westminster Corporation for the purpose of constructing a senior citizen residence. Westminster is working with a group of Edina churches 'who will be the sponsoring entity of this project. (Westminster operates under the auspices of the Catholic Archdioseses of Minneapolis and St. Paul.) From a program standpoint, the project would be identical to South Haven which was recently constructed at Parklawn and York Avenue. Residents of the building would be lower income senior citizens whose rent would be based upon their ability to pay. If the project received preliminary approval, an application will be submitted to HUD to finance the project. Final approval would not be sought until a financing commitment is achieved which may occur later this year. The applicant requests a rezoning of the property to PSR -4, Planned Senior Residence. A three -story building is proposed which would house 28 senior.citizen units and one caretaker unit. As with the previous townhouse plan, the applicant proposes the vacation of Summit Avenue and the inclusion of the vacated right of way into the site. Access to the site will be maintained both to Interlachen Boulevard as well as Vernon Avenue to alleviate the site distance problems associated with the Summit and Interlachen intersection. From the Zoning Ordinance standpoint, the project generally complies but the following deficiencies should be noted: Required Proposed Lot Area for 29 dwelling units 33,750 sq. ft. 32,500 Enclosed parking 8 spaces 7 spaces Exposed parking 15 spaces 14 spaces Parking setbacks 10 feet 5 feet Building setback requirements are somewhat unusual in this case in that the lot does not front on a public street in the traditional sense. Staff has suggested that the east side of the building should be considered the front yard and the west side should be considered the rear yard. Thirty - five foot setbacks are required and have been.provided except that the northwesterly corner of the building maintains 32 feet. The north and south sides of the building should be considered interior side yards which require 20 foot setbacks as have been provided. Building height was a concern expressed by property owners to the west in regard to the prior townhouse plan. This concern will likely be raised again, especially since the proposed building is a full three stories in height rather than two and one -half stories as were the townhouses. Although a final grading plan has not been produced, the first floor elevation of the proposed building will be lower than the townhouses that' were proposed. As a result, it appears that the proposed building will be no taller than the townhouses which were approved for the site. Recommendation: Staff believes that the subject property is an excellent site for senior citizen housing due to its proximity to necessary services while enjoying a residential setting. The Comprehensive Plan includes the Grandview area as a.general location for assisted elderly housing and notes that elderly housing should be encouraged in areas designated as low or medium density residential where essential support services are available. We generally agree with the proposed building location and setbacks. The vacation of Summit Avenue is still appropriate in our opinion, although the proposed plans result in a greater liklihood of short - cutting through the site as compared with the townhouse plan which provided a more circuitous drive aisle. Additional measures should be explored to discourage such short - cutting. As noted earlier, some aspects of the proposal do not conform with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. In short, the building contains one too many units. However, it is questionable that the deletion of one unit provides any benefits to the development. We recommend preliminary rezoning-'approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Vacation of Summit Avenue. Cross easements and maintenance agreements with the townhouses to the north will have to be resolved prior to final approval. 2. Acceptable overall development plans. We will be particularly concerned with the landscape treatment along the westerly lot line to provide a suitable buffer for the single family homes to the west. 3. Final platting 4. Subdivision dedication 5. Developers Agreement 6. Redevelopment contract with the Edina HRA Trossen /Wri ht al F.4 —.— 5L V,W. MN 551111 550C ia 6 Ato Afeh,1 05 912/.5529!0 29 UNITS - EDINA 'WOODHAVEN' � o LEGEND 1. UNION 76 SERVICE STATION 2. JIFFY LUBE 3. HOLIDAY GAS STATION 4. FIRST BANK EDINA S. EDINA LIQUOR /JERRY'S HARDWARE 6. BILTMORE BOWL 7. JERRY'S FOOD STORE 8. EDINA FAMILY CARE CLINIC 9. SUPER AMERICA GAS STATION 10. UNION 76 CAR WASH 11. BILTMORE MOTOR HOTEL 12. AMOCO GAS STATION NOHT SITE LOCATION SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL F---+ UHIVhJVAY AT _9J — _ — ~— 1 SLGPE DOWN : 6 TO CORNER AT INTERLACHEN ' I �• RAILROAD TIE AND WOOD BOARD - - - - - - - 03 - -- / RETAINING WALL, WOOOFENCE ABOVE 180 , 7-7, `I I I I I '1 n I I l i 73 72 EXISTING „1 I HOME I i cs I I nlrm� I i I ; I I I Ir �Il rl I � I� PARKING LOT AT S56' -__ W U. f I Q I I h •I 1,1j1' U -I- 11, r 1 �IIII I W -6T T- r I I 'E %ISTING HOM '�I ' m I co ' I ' CONCRETE BLOCK RETAINING WALL _Z _ _I S' TO 12' TALL ` W (E %ISTING DRIVES NOT SHO WN)I I Q �I 35' I 1 I I , I 'S I I 2G' AUTO SERVICE %I� STING HOME I I BUSINESS N PARAPET AT S4 10 ROVE ADJACENT STREET �� -- _ - _ — J _ r.- _ _3' -WOOD FEN4_ _ �'rVyb D FENCF- ' PARKING LOT FOR GAS STATION c Trossen /Wri nc ,•16•f Ma.�•= GAS STATION 9 SL ” MN SSI I! a Aaaxfau Arcnn.cu ewssz9eo 29 UNITS — EDINA'WOODHAVEN' SLOPE _* 4' TO CORNER OF VERNON 69 I ® EXISTING SITE PLAN I I 1 7 'TUCK- UNDER' GARAGES 32' NEW BUILDING 35• 28 UNITS, 3 FLOORS Trossen /Wri ht 1e1 u„ `• • ."' 9 S ..0 a11e A A-1.1e A UliWU 6121.55 aw V 29 UNITS — EDINA 'WOODHAVEN' TO I CHEN BOUL� VARD RKING FOR 14 CARS I ' I MAIN NTR NCE � 1 o ' OTENTIAL DDITIONAL -PA-R I TO V RNONI AVENL E W ®SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO I INTER�ACHEN SOUL T 'TUCK- UNDER' GARAGES NEW BUILDING 28 UNITS, 3 FLOORS D PARKING FOR 14 CARS HEDGE SCREEN - - , OTN ETIAI DDI TONAIL AiiK TO V RNONI AVENIE W , ® SITE PLAN Trossen/Wright s6 vE.".. ails - 6 Af —islo ArchllsClf 6121455 MO 29 UNITS - EDINA 'WOODHAVEN' %7FIRST FLOOR PLAN 0 4 8 18 & A Qsen /Wright m1 :.)1 200 . 8 A)) n AICrigh) 51 P N. MN $5,1e^u e�zl.ss: sea SECOND AND THIRD FLOORS V29 UNITS - EDINA 'WOODHAVEN' TYPICAL FLOOR 0 4 8 18 30 22.0' 22 '0' A- TYPICAL UNIT 540 N.S.F riocrcVLH7 anuwtn W /FOLD DOWN SEAT 13-HANDICAPPED UNIT 1 540 N.S.F. Trosse l/Wfl jilt 161 E.11 11-6 A—'— & Associate Architects St. v.w. MN 55116 617/455 7960 29 UNITS .= EDINA VOODHAVEN' . 3' DOORS UNIT RY VT AT SINK FRONT SUSAN B.C. TYPICAL UNIT PLANS CHJ 1 CL—F— V 1 1 VIV Trossen /Wright Is, E...— .- A A.. «at. Amhl.C:. 5: v.d. MN 55.'a e4"55 nao 29 UNITS - EDINA'V/OODHAVEN' EXTERIOR ELEVATION 5` 4 4 '' NUMBER Z-83 -6 Haymaker S -84 -1 L O C A T 10 N Lots 3, 4, 5; Block 4, Grandview Hts. Generally located south of the Interlachen Boulevard, west of Summit Avenue and north of Vernon Avenue. REQUEST R -1 Single Family Dwelling District to PZD -3 Planned Residential District. Interlachen Point Condominiums EDINA _PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 1, 1984 Z -83 -6 Haymaker. Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block 4, Grandview Heights. R -1 Single Family Dwelling District to PRD -3, Planned Residential District. Overall Development Plan. S -84 -1 Preliminary Plat of Interlachen Point Generally located: South of I nterlachen and West of Summit Avenue Refer to: Attached Overall Development Plan and Preliminary Plat The City Council granted preliminary rezoning approval to PRD -3 for the subject property on December 19, 1983. The preliminary plans for this project illustrated eight townhouse units which would be integrated with five identical units which were previously approved. The proponents have now returned with an overall development plan and are requesting final rezoning approval. A preliminary plat has also been submitted. The overall development plan includes a final site plan, grading plan, utility plans, landscape plan, and elevation drawings. As noted at preliminary approval, the grading plan illustrates the lowering of the existing ground elevation in the central portion of the site. This results in the lowering of the proposed building heights such that the townhouses will resemble conventional two -story dwellings (in terms of height) as viewed from the west. The landscape plan pays special attention to the westerly property line by proposing eight, 8 - 10 foot conifers for screening purposes. The proposed subdivision anticipates a one lot plat of the property with individual units to be conveyed via condominium documents. At present, the previously approved five -units are not proposed to be i.ncluded in the plat.. The proponents will shortly submit a petition for the vacation of Summit Avenue. The preliminary development plan as well as the attached final plans were based on the understanding that the Summit Avenue right of way measured 46 feet in width. It now appears that this right of way is actually 40 feet in width. A separate six food wide easement to Edina for 'open space and landscape purposes" adjoins the east side of the 40 foot right of way. It is not now clear whether the six foot easement can be vacated along with the 40 foot easement. If it cannot be vacated, the building and parking setback from the east lot line will be reduced even though the positions of the buildings will be unchanged. Community Development and Planning Commission February 1, 1984 Haymaker Page two In connection with the Summit Avenue vacation, the Council requested that the Traffic Safety Committee review access to the site from Interlachen Boulevard. The Committee recommended that, Interlachen should be limited to one -way into the site. As a second, but less desirable alternative, the Committee recommended that an island be constructed at the intersection of the driveway and Interlachen which would allow full access into the site but right turns only out of the site. Recommendation Staff believes that the project will provide an excellent redevelopment of these properties. The mass and height of the buildings should be compatible with surrounding development and will be a positive addition to this area. Although the proposed landscape plans will not totally hide the project as viewed from the west, it does represent an appropriate level of screening for the property. We recommend final zoning approval conditioned upon: 1. Inclusion of the Traffic Stafety Committee's recommendations into the overall development plan. Staff favors the Committee's second alternative. 2. Revision of the utility plan to: a. loop the water main to connect to existing lines south of the site for fire protection; b. relocate ' sewer and water lines such that they are located under pavement areas rather than landscape areas; c. provide additional i.nformati.on as to the feasibility of the storm sewer proposed for the site, 3. Vacation of Summit Avenue. 4. Final plat approval. In our view, it would be desirable to include the Phase I property in the plat. 5. Developer's Agreement. 6. Subdivision Dedication. February 1, 1984 Community Development and Planning Commission City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street -Edina, MN 55424 Dear Commission Members: We, the undersigned request that the Community Development and Planning Commission require screening with mature conifer trees between the Interlachen Point development and our single family dwellings along Hankerson Avenue (5013, 5019, 5021, 5025, and 5029). We request that white or blue spruce trees be planted. As for shade trees, we request that the minimum size be at least 6" diamater trees. SD Thank you for your consideration of our request. Respectfully, cc: City Council M -R Properties 9.11 , -1K1 APMXMTV YIFA dl n1AN 1 rR @%M v •n Tff 4fAV nVAI 1 Wk 84AM w MALL wu rum w nA Ao l TM LL NLWWR OF VnR 19 04 b U M f ACM qoll 3" 12 b 9 3 � IRi Q IIl1 b Y i� A 0 SITE DENSITY APMOWATE AW OF PHASE I ERL• S%m O AIPIIOKNATE AREA OP PHASE 0 SITE: 84.000 SP TOTAL ATIEA: 84,— BP (12 ACRES) TOTAL ALMWA OF LW& 13 OR 10 (NITS, ACRE PHASE 2 SITE PLANT SCHEDULE KEY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAM SIZE NN EMERALD OUEEM rCNR. PLATANOIDES S B0 NORWAY MAPLE E ERALO OUEEW 1,1 MA MARSNALLS ERANIM,B PENNO. SEEDLESS A" LANCELOTA E Ili m SL SKYLINE NONEYLOCUBT OLEO, }}e-A TRMITTYLNE' fill, Se SP SCOTCH PIE PONS SYLYEBTOIS 0 -10' MY RR RUOOSA SHINIB ROSE RUGOSA ROOA • 1 POT TV WNTONI SPTEAONO ANPER 'ANIPERUO NOTE WILTOM' S GAL -T DHACC 1 eTT= p 51TE PLAN — LANDSCAPE NOTE' CNCI EO CONTOWiS ARE ASSUMED CONTOURS- @RSY EKWTNO eormoNs 0 ow may„ cesy� _ A� l•` I Y • sro '41F1 4 r t q S r. u f i / � r 99 LiF' � l V-3 0 L It 1 li l Q {{{{ I II i 'bsao SITE DENSTf A"ACOun AMA d WAN 1 IRG uv X04ATS AMA OF MAN I Wft TOTAL uu: TOTAL MU a OF UNTIL Mal r "AM TY UJOO / flJ AMIP 13 OR 10 URS / •CAL SITE SITE PLAN - UTILITIES NOTE: CIRCLED CONTOURS •M ASGUN[D CMTOURS VEMY EMTM ea�mTan � @ - —1 - 8 a 6 3 � m ��KaJj O� G }. 9 3 n Mpg / \ 7 In 1 PtIl ll'�l III iTl i ppOl15 '"�sao Tarb' WEST ELEVATION • wi= . EAST ELEVABON ROTLE: 1: LIEVATONE SHOWN ANE PLMM� O / -ELOOE L MARE "WAR l ALL LNUPA0N YAIEle.1LE lgdAFON LX131MI COwETM1CT1O" - Rf= � 332*Q4 : LNOLVL BeEaT" g IeT LVL Y Ro v lluuu 0 ��� 1 •if , ♦oiE'�i,r- il�i �.a . 111 I�II�II NE-O r�-pp�l ss 1� ..7�G. A�`4'LCC L� 4i C '517 N� NORTH ELEVATION 1njll':� 012 • • SOUTH ELEVATION holAR 1: LL EVAII3NE 6jA7WM AW EDIT d 001- LLDO E E 0 ARE EEaAII E: Ala E4IEO1011 UA19RMG TO UA1GI 1.01110 CGMSTM CnW W2M LVL �r� 9 7 � Air IVL GRADE lids . '�Erao O M �QO �a EEFi L. �1 III 1 1 �'all IJI1II A� 14 14 -cc1: Aa'" • PETITION FOR ZONE CHANGE Case Number Date Fee -0- Date Paid Applicant Woodhaven Non - Profit Housing Corp Phone 291 -1750 Address 328 West -Sixth Street; St. Paul MN zip 55102 _ Status of Applicant: (Owner, Buyer, Lessee, etc.) Owner (option) Legal Description: Lot 3, Block 4 Grandview Heights; Lot 4, Block 40- Grandview Heights; Lot 5, Block 4, Grandview Heights; and rK�r - . rG Ar c�.a y - Street Address: Presently zoned: R -1 Change to: PSR -4 Reasons for Request for Rezoning:: 1. To construct a 29 unit elderly & Handicapped apartment building. 3. W FOY I M Al 'A or � All a W-j k 61, 1 k! I I ilk [CM f7ff : AT.= *8% mft�� i WJUZI-09 FACCCCMII� p ..IWAIMI-dl II. New Business: S -85 -2 Interlachen Heights �G Generally located: West of Ridge Road and North and South of Interlachen Boulevard. ILI Mr. Hughes reported that the subject property measures 12.75 acres in area and is zoned R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. An existing dwelling is located in the north central portion of the property. The property adjoins developed, or partially developed, R -1 lots on its north and east sides. That portion of the site located north of Interlachen Boulevard adjoins Van Valkenburg Park on the west and that portion located south of Interlachen Boulevard adjoins undeveloped R -1 property. The applicant's subdivision plan proposes 20 R -1 lots for the property. Lot 7 of the proposed plat would be retained for the existing home. The proposed lots are very large, ranging from 17,500 square feet to 34,900 square feet with an average of 23,000 square feet. He explained that the plat proposes the westerly extension of Interlachen Boulevard and the northerly extension to Interlachen of Green Farms Road. The area north of Interlachen Boulevard is proposed to be served by two cul de sacs rather than a through street due to dimensional problems as well as undesirable effects on the existing home. Both Interlachen and Green Farms are proposed to terminate with temporary cul de sacs pending development of properties to the south and west. However, Carl Hansen, the owner of the adjoining property is apparently interested in now extending Green Farms. Road from the south, thus eliminating the need for one of the cul de sacs. Mr. Hughes stated that the proposed plat represents an anticipated development of the subject property in terms of land use and street extensions. Proposed lot sizes are generous and are compatible with the large lot character of this part of Edina. Staff sees no reason for requiring the extension of Interlachen Boulevard westerly to Malibu Drive at this time. Such an extension should be considered in connection with the next subdivision to the west. Mr. Hughes summarized Staff's criticisms of the proposed plat. First, the side lot lines of Lot 3, Block 2 and Lot 2, Block 1, should be oriented more radially with the curve of Green Farms Road to provide more logical lot shapes. Second, there could be some changes to the proposed street grades, although this is an aspect of final plat approval. Third, the temporary cul de sac for Interlachen could be deleted in that the permanent cul de sac for Interlachen Court would suffice in this regard. However, Staff has no objections to providing the temporary cul de sac if the applicant so desires. A final issue concerning this plat is subdivision dedication. Mr. Hughes said that. existing vegetation will adequately screen proposed homesites from the park and better use could be made of a cash dedication. However, this issue should be referred to the Park Board for their recommendation prior to hearing by the Council. Staff recommends preliminary plat approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Developer's Agreement 2. Revision of street grades prior to final plat 3. Subdivision dedication 4. Realignment of lot lines as discussed earlier Mr. Hughes noted that he had been approached by a Ridge Road resident who inquired about the possibility of serving some of the deep lots on Ridge Road as part of the proposed plat with the Parkwood Knolls plat to the south. If it desirable to extend a street or access to the rear of the Ridge Road properties, Staff believes that this would be the most feasible way. A cul de sac could strattle the lot line between the Loufec property to the north and the Hansen property to the south. The Ridge Road resident intends to discuss these preliminary suggestions with other neighbors as well as Mr. Loufec and Mr. Hansen. Although this does not affect the proposed plan, however, the north half of the right of way could be reserved as an outlot to facilitate this extension in the future. Mrs. McClelland suggested that Interlachen Boulevard construction be done as soon as possible in conjunction with the construction at Van Valkenburg Park. Mr. Hughes noted that final grading for the Park was a different type of grading than that for the roadway. Therefore, it was doubtful that any savings would result. Mr. Hoffman added that the right -of -way for the further extension of Interlachen had not as yet been secured. Mrs. McClelland moved for approval of the subdivision subject to the conditions suggested in the Staff report. She also suggested that Carl Hansen be contacted regarding an early construction of Interlachen Boulevard. Mr. Del Johnson seconded the motion. All were in favor; the motion carried. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 27, 1985 S -85 -2 Interlachen Heights Generally located: West of Ridge Road and North and South of Interlachen Boulevard. Refer to: Attached Preliminary Plat The subject property measures 12.75 acres in area and is zoned R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. An existing dwelling is located in the north central portion of the property. The property adjoins developed, or partially developed, R -1 lots.on its north and east sides. That portion of the site located north of Interlachen Boulevard adjoins Van Valkenburg Pork on the west and that portion located south of Interlachen Boulevard adjoins undeveloped R -1 property. The applicant's subdivision plan proposes 20 R -1 lots for the property. Lot 7 of the proposed plat would be retained for the existing home. The proposed lots are very large, ranging from 17,500 square feet to 34,900 square feet with an average of 23,000 square feet. The plat proposes the westerly extension of Interlachen Boulevard and the northerly extension to Interlachen of Green Farms Road as was proposed in the preliminary plat of Parkwood Knolls 20th Addition which was approved several years ago. The area north of Interlachen Boulevard is proposed to be served by two cul de sacs rather than a through street due to dimensional problems as well as undesirable effects on the existing home. Both Interlachen and Green Farms are proposed to terminate with temporary cul de sacs pending development of properties to the south and west. However, Carl Hansen, the owner of the adjoining property is apparently interested in now extending Green Farms Road from the south, thus eliminating the need for one of the cul de sacs. Recommendation The proposed plat represents an anticipated development of the subject property in terms of land use and street extensions. Proposed lot sizes are generous and are �w compatible with the large lot character of this part of Edina. We agree with the applicant regarding several issues concerning the proposed plat. First, we see no reason for extending Green Farms Road northerly to Waterman Avenue. Such an extension would encounter serious topography problems and would provide few benefits. In this regard, we believe that further subdivisions of underdeveloped properties to the east and north are best oriented to the north rather than to Interlachen Boulevard. Second, we agree with the two cul de sacs rather than a through street north of Interlachen Boulevard. A through street in this location would create a lot for the existing home which would be bordered by a street on three sides. Third, we see no reason for requiring the extension of Interlachen Boulevard westerly to Malibu Drive at this time. Such an extension should be considered in connection with the next subdivision to the west. Our criticisms of the proposed plat are relatively minor. First, we suggest that the side lot lines of Lot 3, Block 2 and Lot 2, Block 1, should be oriented more radially with the curve of Green Farms Road to provide more logical lot shapes. Second, Staff suggests some changes to the proposed street grades, although this is an aspect of final plat approval. Third, we would note that the temporary cul de sac for Interlachen could be deleted in that the permanent cul de sac for Interlachen Court would suffice in this regard. However, we have no objections to providing the temporary cul de sac if the applicant so desires. A final issue concerning this plat is subdivision dedication. As noted earlier, this property adjoins Van Valkenburg Park which is currently being developed, principally as a ballfield complex. The City's guidelines concerning subdivision dedication states that a land dedication should be considered when the "property is adjacent to an existing park or public open space and the addition (of more land) beneficially expands the park or public open space." The alternative to a land dedication is, of course, the payment of cash to the City. In reviewing the plans for this park, it is apparent that no changes would be made to the proposed location of the ball fields or other recreational facilities if additional land were available. However, it could be argued that a land dedication would provide desirable buffering between homesites and active ballfields, especially those designed for nighttime use. In other instances, the City has attempted to separate homesites from parks by a public street to avoid conflicts. If a land dedication were required, the proposed plat would be seriously affected. Two lots, or possibly three lots, would be lost. In my view, existing vegetation will adequately screen proposed homesites from the park and better use could be made of a cash dedication. This issue should be referred to the Park Board for their recommendation prior to hearing by the Council. Staff recommends preliminary plat approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Developer's Agreement 2. Revision of street grades prior to final plat 3. Subdivision dedication 4. Realignment of lot lines as discussed earlier RF.SnT.TTTT0M WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land: Lot 2, Block 1, LINDAHL'S ADDITION, and WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: Southerly Parcel: That part of Lot 2, Block 1, LINDAHL'S ADDITION which lies South of a line running from a point on the West line of said Lot 2, distant 36.19 feet North of the Southwest corner thereof to a point.on the Easterly line of said Lot 2, distant 41.23 feet Northerly of the Southeast corner thereof, as measured along said Easterly line thereof, and Northerly Parcel: That part of Lot 2, Block 1, LINDAHL'S ADDITION which lies North of a line running from a point on the West line of said Lot 2, distant 36.19 feet North of the Southwest corner thereof to a point on the Easterly line of said Lot 2, distant 41.23 feet Northerly of the Southeast corner thereof, as measured along said Easterly line thereof; WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. ADOPTED this 1st day of April, 1985. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MARCH 27, 1985 LD -85 -2 Peters. Lot 2, Block 1, Lindahl's Addn. 4233 - 35 Valley View Road Refer to: Attached Survey The applicant requests a party -wall division of an existing two - family dwelling on Valley View Road. The applicant has applied for and received a waiver of the City's requirement for separate utility connections. Recommendation: Approval. MOPITY OF EDINA P4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424 612 - 927 -8861 March 15, 1985 Mr. & Mrs. Walter J. Peters C/O L. Cramer Company 5500 Lincoln Drive Edina, PAIN 55436 RE: VARIANCE REQUEST FOR 4233 - 35 Vallev View Road Dear Sirs: In connection with your recent request for waiver to allow one water and one sewer line to serve 4233 and 42.35 Valley View Road, this letter is to confirm that your request has been approved by the Edina Board of Building Appeals. Sincerely, O. John Schirmang, Buildings Official OS: kb cc: Tom Pies, Realty Center Edina Planning Dept. �4 C H� w .1 U t on J s J NOS MV NOSIft 18VU '0 s 4i i 11 � ND N a Y ww A cis V • t 11l •t el4't U1t 1 /111.01 11w4 � . 1(• �� -• US on 01 ball Wiple p pigs iv0 • •Op*Aogv It . of 7a• 1 1 '3113 •3uv1 101 lei H 01199 s4lpNip Nvlaas•p •4O0e •s3 / 00'1 Io 9rwitlp .1$9$109 7451 J 301 vines •30$107 17..1 It. 11 Io •0u91s1p I $•loop 14611 . It Stsp e3ve41 IsBo1 00.9 is S310ry$ip • fvleu$ well It lilies 030.41 .Jooiall suit 11JHSe3 - i - .:PIIS sell# p.4n wed so •JOSJ•47 Ja9J03 i2444inas all Ja 1140411el jaaJ C2•11 'turlslp 'v Sol pin jo Sell dl Jotely 041 at lvtod 9 at J68,641 aoule3 -4104YIROS alit Jo 4'Joe jsa1 69.99 11011510 It Sol plot 40 sell MA 041 Ys Ivtod 9 call outuval suit 9 is snoal9Jal [1111 13 041 Jo 11JS1son 1806 valor %also a So sulsal 44 so p011143$ap 10111008 s.lx9aall 'I X3016 •1: too he tied 1t111 ' :19301583 39YIY9 103 1011111353 i' .. .::; •,;. ;: •josifvl snit Jlisin3 plot avail ,alms$•* a • /OsJall ' J•MO iNe93not but is-slis411a1 Sol Cl-It jut Ilip •v 701 pigs Jo full J11ajIt3 a41 uo lutes o e1 JON *41 JfYJ03 12001411104 041 JO *7JO* Iasi 61'99 7ug151p 'v 501 plot JO null 11911 .YS n iYfed • Boil auluYm/ lull I Je.4S404 jail 43144 1011100Y S,lpvaull '1 13016 It Sol JO %Jed jell 09019 it IsJY) :133184 111301100 109 901141/393 ' •josis4l full Jtiallal pill Buell palmtop. of 'lake$ desist Uesinnos eve if JiJVQIJS1 388J Wit 1 -115111 'L too plot Jo full 41Jalse3 64% us 7ulod • 07 JOOJ6Y1 4691.3 .41I44tsOS alt he 411o0 ISO; 61.99 7usislo •1: 101 pigs J0 gull lisp Oul to • ''_ .' 1910 9 BoJJ 0utuval oull a 40 vine$ $011 4314a 00111008 S.lpY0911 '1 73019 'v Sol is 'tied 31111 ('iJ 'IS 616'$ 11 /aJ8) :131181d 11min05 0od so11d103S1 /^ C 11011100V 6.111vasl7 '1 laoll •Z 109 — -LZ '09/ ('11 -6s 666.11 it a &IV) :uO174143s80 ItuIOIJ �uafY :104 Jaum 90 0 nil Q v6r, ecJ • o f 5'czo,a/y 1 A r�. I1r 01 t L, t _ —__ x fr x .. ! ! . ti" lE- lt~' q1'• r��' lr�'; a�t�` ��+.: �Ltlt��; �l�> li�l�i45(!!1Ma:alo�li!4YJi,'I�t I I,11' "'�r �li''i' ' °4 i� + ..� _ . .. � �.1 ..wr .,e,:, r r 011 'r 4NI,I.,s SS" ��.y,•;tIM'. /e NYO 11950 YYIM r' .! '4 . ':'e:;�:� �( +�� f fji • ! .y,x�r 1 't� ti•s401I60M s• ,��• _•- ti' Ilosltra t • N NOSlvv3 - (� J J ' '� 4 � �••:, ..: - .; -: test, 14113.11111 he it mill list Volvo 'Pull rive vo 1e moll •Jvo It •8101 NOS MV NOSIft 18VU '0 s 4i i 11 � ND N a Y ww A cis V • t 11l •t el4't U1t 1 /111.01 11w4 � . 1(• �� -• US on 01 ball Wiple p pigs iv0 • •Op*Aogv It . of 7a• 1 1 '3113 •3uv1 101 lei H 01199 s4lpNip Nvlaas•p •4O0e •s3 / 00'1 Io 9rwitlp .1$9$109 7451 J 301 vines •30$107 17..1 It. 11 Io •0u91s1p I $•loop 14611 . It Stsp e3ve41 IsBo1 00.9 is S310ry$ip • fvleu$ well It lilies 030.41 .Jooiall suit 11JHSe3 - i - .:PIIS sell# p.4n wed so •JOSJ•47 Ja9J03 i2444inas all Ja 1140411el jaaJ C2•11 'turlslp 'v Sol pin jo Sell dl Jotely 041 at lvtod 9 at J68,641 aoule3 -4104YIROS alit Jo 4'Joe jsa1 69.99 11011510 It Sol plot 40 sell MA 041 Ys Ivtod 9 call outuval suit 9 is snoal9Jal [1111 13 041 Jo 11JS1son 1806 valor %also a So sulsal 44 so p011143$ap 10111008 s.lx9aall 'I X3016 •1: too he tied 1t111 ' :19301583 39YIY9 103 1011111353 i' .. .::; •,;. ;: •josifvl snit Jlisin3 plot avail ,alms$•* a • /OsJall ' J•MO iNe93not but is-slis411a1 Sol Cl-It jut Ilip •v 701 pigs Jo full J11ajIt3 a41 uo lutes o e1 JON *41 JfYJ03 12001411104 041 JO *7JO* Iasi 61'99 7ug151p 'v 501 plot JO null 11911 .YS n iYfed • Boil auluYm/ lull I Je.4S404 jail 43144 1011100Y S,lpvaull '1 13016 It Sol JO %Jed jell 09019 it IsJY) :133184 111301100 109 901141/393 ' •josis4l full Jtiallal pill Buell palmtop. of 'lake$ desist Uesinnos eve if JiJVQIJS1 388J Wit 1 -115111 'L too plot Jo full 41Jalse3 64% us 7ulod • 07 JOOJ6Y1 4691.3 .41I44tsOS alt he 411o0 ISO; 61.99 7usislo •1: 101 pigs J0 gull lisp Oul to • ''_ .' 1910 9 BoJJ 0utuval oull a 40 vine$ $011 4314a 00111008 S.lpY0911 '1 73019 'v Sol is 'tied 31111 ('iJ 'IS 616'$ 11 /aJ8) :131181d 11min05 0od so11d103S1 /^ C 11011100V 6.111vasl7 '1 laoll •Z 109 — -LZ '09/ ('11 -6s 666.11 it a &IV) :uO174143s80 ItuIOIJ �uafY :104 Jaum 90 0 nil Q v6r, ecJ • o f 5'czo,a/y 1 A r�. I1r 01 t L, t _ —__ x fr x 90 0 nil Q v6r, ecJ • o f 5'czo,a/y 1 A r�. I1r 01 t L, t _ —__ x fr x A, 6 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MARCH 27, 1985 LD -85 -2 Peters. Lot 2, Block 1, Lindahl's Addn. 4233 - 35 Valley View Road Refer to: Attached Survey The applicant requests a party -wall division of an existing two - family dwelling on Valley View Road. The applicant has applied for and received a waiver of the City's requirement for separate utility connections. Recommendation: Approval. F MEN""," DREDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET. EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424 612- 927 -8861 March 15, 1985 Mr. & Mrs. Walter J. Peters C/O L. Cramer Company 5500 Lincoln Drive Edina, PAIN 55436 RE: VARIANCE REQUEST FOR 4233 - 35 Valley View Road Dear Sirs: In connection with your recent request for waiver to allow one water and one sewer line to serve 4233 and 42.35 Valley View Road, this letter is to confirm that your request has been approved by the Edina Board of Building Appeals. Sincerely, 0. John Schirmang, Building Official cial OS:kb cc: Tom Pies, Realty Center Edina Planning Dept. urrq for: L. CRANER CO., INC. —�n-3. ` - �fBnr_G o.f h r101na1 Description: (Are• Is 11,96! fG. Ft.) lot 2, Gloct I, IIMDAHL'3 ADDITION o ESCR VTION ►OR SDUTNERLT PARCEL• (Are• Is S,f19 SO• Ft.) ihat part of tot t• clock 1, LINDAHL'S ADDITION ■nitre Iln South of • Ilns 'running from • joist Eatrr.rf , ^ 1 W, paint on the EateNy Ilne oI said lot 1, alfant N.13 fast Northerly of the Souta•ast eo:4r r t ? � ° s . � � � � � P� f s// "'� •.r y,. .,..� '. — _ 4s zz —' — � M ° U4 Point on the Easterly line of a10 lot 1, alsta nt e1.13 fast Northerly of tN f•Ythasst Cs!oor . thereof, as measured along said Easterly line thereof. ISCRI►TION FOR GARAGE EASEMENT: ' '. -' ',t _ - °° V, N That pert of LOt E, Nlock 1, LINOANL'S AOOITION described as Mgleving a •`jalst 46.11 fast ' k: vR,1 , -7,•', Yaterly oI tM fssterll tenlno•f e/ • Iln raanlnq from • pslat n the Yeast Iln• of teas fat, 1. alatant 36.1! feet Ro rth of the SaethY!at Coiner the root to a point Om tae [later IF line of IIyy r uId Lot 1. distant 11.73 Inet Rort hfrly of the Sauthelst torte► ther•o /, at measured along s•Id '•• [atterl7 Ilas thereof; thence North •1 rfphL enplu • alatanre 01 3.00 11•t; thence Vag a ". 1.• )� right angles a distance of 11.66 fast: theec• SOUth •t right •ngla a dlatese• of 1.00 feat tO, ;•.' the dorm .• -deed dlrlalnq Ilse of lot !i thaw [a at, •fang alas alrlan SIR$ to ths.folat�.',: ' 01 6egInl■q. ... ARLSON INC r h°ny certify that this Is a true and correct r•preasetatlaN o/ a surry7 0f eR• hnGa►11s •f U• ud •bas aeufrome area of the loc•tlas 'y' '•1'•- 1 ARLSON� N all WINI■ s, 1/ any, thanes Na atl•gl Gf ►IG ••trNCR• :. use. If ny, [rod or as sold Lane. . N•tW eau frih �q of 14reh, .1fGS• •- � . • ,� '� - - - , �; Alf CARL n 14: . 1 1/ :r.rT A;f7 % i A) sT1� E by r r •• ` , E Larry tdmth"': LING fr►Nmes�/ I1 1a aU Its • 'ROH,•."i, ..yi,+lMwt 4' If 1. c'`•{j.,:' }r.. t J- . . - - -.,.,� . +.., � .. ... ,. �.. � ,. ,�,,�I.;'',��'�i.•'ff ",+ �,1;7�iS$�"'1 �Y!ltlli�j�1!' rYUly, ' ��;�- N - ,,. �I , � h• 1. ut}jr., dl �; a. �zt, l�f� !tir „��i;�iS�?#���f�:b��l';:; .IE , � �� J urrq for: L. CRANER CO., INC. —�n-3. ` - �fBnr_G o.f h r101na1 Description: (Are• Is 11,96! fG. Ft.) lot 2, Gloct I, IIMDAHL'3 ADDITION ' ESCR VTION ►OR SDUTNERLT PARCEL• (Are• Is S,f19 SO• Ft.) ihat part of tot t• clock 1, LINDAHL'S ADDITION ■nitre Iln South of • Ilns 'running from • joist as the Y•st Ilne o► atd lot 1, distant 76.19 fast North of t1u of Swett corner thereof to a paint on the EateNy Ilne oI said lot 1, alfant N.13 fast Northerly of the Souta•ast eo:4r thereof, as ■asurea aionp uld Eat larl7 Ilne tnereo /. , ESCRI►TION FOR NORTHERLY PARCEL: (Ares Is 6.060 Sq. ft.) ieaI pert of Lot 1, Glotk 1, LINOAHL'S AUDITION which lief North of • 11 n• runnlny /rod a feint ' , ea the Nat Ilse or 'I'd Lot t, Blatant 76.19 fed Roreh of the 3outer•at corner thereof to e Point on the Easterly line of a10 lot 1, alsta nt e1.13 fast Northerly of tN f•Ythasst Cs!oor . thereof, as measured along said Easterly line thereof. ISCRI►TION FOR GARAGE EASEMENT: ' '. -' ',t '•" That pert of LOt E, Nlock 1, LINOANL'S AOOITION described as Mgleving a •`jalst 46.11 fast ' k: vR,1 , -7,•', Yaterly oI tM fssterll tenlno•f e/ • Iln raanlnq from • pslat n the Yeast Iln• of teas fat, 1. alatant 36.1! feet Ro rth of the SaethY!at Coiner the root to a point Om tae [later IF line of IIyy r uId Lot 1. distant 11.73 Inet Rort hfrly of the Sauthelst torte► ther•o /, at measured along s•Id '•• [atterl7 Ilas thereof; thence North •1 rfphL enplu • alatanre 01 3.00 11•t; thence Vag a ". 1.• )� right angles a distance of 11.66 fast: theec• SOUth •t right •ngla a dlatese• of 1.00 feat tO, ;•.' the dorm .• -deed dlrlalnq Ilse of lot !i thaw [a at, •fang alas alrlan SIR$ to ths.folat�.',: ' 01 6egInl■q. ... ARLSON INC r h°ny certify that this Is a true and correct r•preasetatlaN o/ a surry7 0f eR• hnGa►11s •f U• ud •bas aeufrome area of the loc•tlas 'y' '•1'•- 1 ARLSON� N all WINI■ s, 1/ any, thanes Na atl•gl Gf ►IG ••trNCR• :. use. If ny, [rod or as sold Lane. . N•tW eau frih �q of 14reh, .1fGS• •- � . • ,� '� - - - , �; •. CARL n 14: . 1 1/ :r.rT A;f7 % i A) sT1� by r r •• ` , E Larry tdmth"': LING fr►Nmes�/ I1 1a aU Its • 'ROH,•."i, ..yi,+lMwt 4' If 1. c'`•{j.,:' }r.. t J- . . - - -.,.,� . +.., � .. ... ,. �.. � ,. ,�,,�I.;'',��'�i.•'ff ",+ �,1;7�iS$�"'1 �Y!ltlli�j�1!' rYUly, ' ��;�- N - ,,. �I , � h• 1. ut}jr., dl �; a. �zt, l�f� !tir „��i;�iS�?#���f�:b��l';:; .IE , sH V w N C� \ A l �b� It ,�_-- X ���hce x IQ, ZX I V�X t 420.42 O N -� v A. U -k M �k i 1i Z.S.OS fiefl SprYey for: IL,•CRAMER CO.. INC. �c Orj4Lpal Descriytfon• Y(11rea: is .1t,O89 f IV, 0 .2, 'Block 1, t111DAHl'S ADOITiOx DESCRIP)ION ..FOR SOUTHERLY -.PARCEL:. '(Area is E.929- $q. Ft ) ':''a.TA &t girt of Lot-2,. Block -1:, 11NDAHL'S'AODITION-which lies South .of 1:1106 - running from a p01at. "166, the We 50 of said Lot 2.,dIstant 3¢.19 feet-North of'the Southwest corder thereof to a ofnt on thq Easterly line of .said Lot 2. distant 41.23 feet Northerly of the Southeast corner, ereof, 4s .mosared along said Easter4 Ine thereof :. :{ DESCRIPTION FOR: NORTHERLY PARCEL ,Area 48,6.060 Sq. Et ) 0i,t part'of Lot 2. Block t. LI "I.-distant ADDITION which lief RartA of alt no running from a point_ =per the West line of said Lot . 36.19 feet North of'the Southwest corner thereof to a . point on.the Easterly line of said Lot 2. distant 41.23 feet Northarly-of.tht Southeast corner. tk*reof• -aa Measured along said Easterllr•.1111e thereof. DESCRIPT1011 FOR SARAH : EASEMENT TUa! part:ot Lot 2; Block G-LINDAHL'S ADDITION described as,booinsing st 0 point 4.6.22 feet r �Vosterly of the Easterly terminous rof •t: line running from 'a point on the. Vest line of said Lot 2'.`distant;46.19'feet North of the Southwest•iorner thereof to-a votat on th :Easterly line of = ',:•aald tat 2. distant 41.23- feet 1lortherly of the Southeast corner thereof, as measured &tong said 'Easterly line thereof; thence North at right angles a distance of 3.00 feet; thence West at "right angles a distance of 22.65 feet: thence South at right . angles a.dfstance of 3.00 feet to the above described dividing line of lot 2; thence East, along said dividing line to the,.potnt•`r,. of beginning. We hereby certify that this is a trde'and correct representation of a surrey of the boundaries of the land above described and of the location of all buildings. if any, thereon.and all visible encroach- ments. it any. from or on said land. Dated this 12th day of March. 1985. :- e' CARLSON CARLSON; INC. - A D SURVEY ORS . X2,""'72. i ,' i Larry Couture. land SurretOr;, Minn sots License xo. 9018 2�/ /!.- � � a 77 777 33 t d 0 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: April 1, 1985 TO: Kenneth Rosland FROM: Craig Larsen SUBJECT: Year XI Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Budget -E-- D Urban Hennepin County has been given a planning allocation of $3, 101, 000 by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for Year Xf of the CDBG program. Edi.na`s Share of $167, 005 represents a decrease of $2, 500 from Year X. A public hearing on our proposed budget has been set for April 1 and notice was published in the Ectina Sun on March 20, 1985. This year again only one public hearing is required prior to submission of our application to Hennepin County. Program guidelines and eligible activities remain the same as previous years. Public service activities remain limited to ten percent of the total budget. Staff has prepared the following budget for City Council consideration. Activity Removal of Slum S Blight Conditions Rehabilitation of Private Property Public Services Removal of Architectural Barriers Assistance to Low and Moderate Income Housing Development Non - Profit Housing Sponsor Amount $108, 205 20,000 8,800 10,000 10,000 10,000 $167,205 Removal of Slum and Blight Conditions is proposed as a new project for Year XI. The project would be targeted to redevelopment activities in the Grandview Area Tax Increment District. The funds would most likely be used to assist the redevelopment of the Biltmore Motel site, but may be used on other redevelopment activities in the District. All other projects in the proposed budget are continued from previous years. Tom Esser of South Hennepin Human Services Council has informed Staff that they wish to continue to receive support from the CDBG program for their H.O.M.E. program. A resolution approving the proposed budget and authorizing its submittal to Hennepin County is recommended by Staff. CL /Ide RESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATION FOR YEAR XI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City of Edina, through execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County, is a cooperating unit in the Urban County Community Development Block Grant Program, and WHEREAS, the City of Edina has developed a proposal for the use of Urban Hennepin County CDBG funds made available to it; and WHEREAS, the following proposed use of Community Development Block Grant funds was developed consistent with program rules: Activity Budget Amount Removal of Slum & Blight Conditions $108,205 Rehabilitation of Private Property 20,000 Public Services 8,800 Removal of Architectural Barriers 10,000 Assistance to Low and Moderate Income Housing Development 10,000 Non - Profit Housing Sponsor 10,000 $167,005 BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina_City.Council Urban Hennepin County Community Development submittal of the proposal to Hennepin Count Advisory Committee and for inclusion in the Community Development Block Grant Statement Funds. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) approves the proposed use of Year XI Block Grant funds and authorizes 7 for consideration by the Citizen Year XI Urban Hennepin County of Objectives and Projected Use of CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 1, 1985, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 19th day of April, 1985. J March 29, 1985 Mr. Craig Larsen Comprehensive Planner City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Larsen: The purpose of this letter is to request continued CDBG funding through the City of Edina for the H.O.M.E. Program for the period July 1, 1985 through June 30, 1986. Based on past experience and the anticipated needs of Edina residents, the amount of $8,000 is requested. As you will see from the attached information, during the period of July 1, 1984 through January 31 of this year, H.O.M.E. provided 141 Edina households with 1,652 hours of service. Included in this total are what we consider to be sixteen major repair or maintenance jobs. By the end of the current funding year, we anticipate that we will have used approximately $23,000 of Fix and Paint and CDBG funds on behalf of Edina residents. I hope that this information provides you and City Council Members with an indication of our involvement with and committment to Edina's senior citizens. It is our firm belief that these services are highly beneficial to the city and its senior residents. Your assistance, as well as the support and encouragement of the City of Edina, continue to be greatly appreciated. Should there be any questions or additional information desired, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, I Thomas J. Esser Executive Director TJE:cp cc: Joan Black SHHSC Edina Board Members 9801 Penn Avenue South • Room 100 • Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 • (612)888 -5530 w SUMMARY OF H.O.M.E. SERVICES IN THE CITY OF EDINA JULY 1, 1984 - JANUARY 31, 1985 * Number of Customers - Number of Households Served - Hours of Service Provided - ** Number of Large Renovation or Repair Jobs Completed - Funds Utilized - Fix and Paint - - CDBG - - Estimated Need Balance of Year - Total Estimated Expenditures 167 141 1 ,652 16 $ 15,300.75 3,945.80 4,753.45 $ 24,000.00 * Number of customers represents actual customer contacts for provision of a specific service. ** Large jobs represent those requiring in excess of ten hours for completion. `�V. A. Award of Bids REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Bob Kojetin, Park and Recreation-Director. VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEPI IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: March 28, 1985 Material Description (General Specifications): Construction of Braemar.Maintenance Building at Braemar Golf Course Quotations /Bids: Company Keho Construction 2. Phillips Klein Co. 3. Fullerton Lumber Amount of Ouote or Bid $194,700 $195,700 $197,500 Department Recommendation: Keho Construction - RecQmmend Base B'd - $ 9 ,700 Depar e Finance Director's Endorsement: i The recommended bid is is not within the amount budget for the purchase. LJ J. N. -Da len, finance Dirartnr City Ma oer's Endorsement: 1- I concur with the recommendation of th e Department and recommend Council approve 2. I recommend as an alternative: '] \ Kenneth Rosland, City Mana4er fI' 1 2 3 Q BID TABULATION FORM BRAEMAR MAINTENANCE BUILDING PROJECT NO. 85103 BID DATE: MARCH 28, 1985 @ 11:00 A.M. CARLSON MJORUD ARCHITECTURE LTD. 4915 WEST 35TH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416 ............................................................................................................................. CONTRACTOR SUNWAY HOMES BASE BID $201,900 ALT. #1 $22,000 ............................... BID BOND ADDENDA KEHO CONSTRUCTION 194,700 21,500 OLSON CONCRETE CO. 224,400 22,500 ROCON CONSTRUCTION 202,207 22,500 PHILLIPS KLEIN CO. 195,700 17,500 VEIT CONSTRUCTION 201,593 23,290 DOLPHIN CONSTR. DEAN & ASSOC. 209,600 22,500 GEN. SHEET METAL FULLERTON LUMBER 197,500 16,224 f:EQUEST FOR PURC;i „SE TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, City Engineer dA: Kenneth Rosland, City f1anaver SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: March 29, 1985 Material Description (General Specifications): Well #9 - Redevelopment ' Quotations /Bids: Company 1. Bergerson Caswell, Inc. � rs - Amount of Quote or Bid $30,223.00 ' 2. Keys Well Drilling Co. * $37,590.00 i. E. H. Renner & Sons,-Inc. $43,603.00 4... Layne Minnesota * $57,860.00 Department Recommendation: . Bergers.om.Caswell, Inc. $30,223.00 • e�5; lz� � ), 9 Public Works - Utility - Si natGr * Bidders #2 & 4 total changed due to err�r compu i unit price extensi rtment Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bi. < is is not within the amount budget for the purchase. . N. Dalen, Fi ante Director City "Man er's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recorrnendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: nLIlUL31 1 U,', t U1t(.,,t L TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, irector of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City ftanaver SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: March 28, 1985 Material Description (General Specifications): Sand, Rock, Bituminous Material' Quotations /Bids: Company See attached Tabulation 2. 3. �G Amount of Quote or Bid Department P.ecormendation: Award to companies with asteriks.on individual items. ter^ ,PUhli� WnrkS tgnature Department Finance Dlrector s Endorsement: The recommended bid bs is not within the amount budget for the purchase. J. N. Dalen, Finance Director City Manager's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recornnendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: r Award Items with asteriks BID TABULATION P.U. = Pick -up by City Trucks CITY UF LUINA, MINNESOTA D. = Delivered, to City SAND - BITUMINOUS MATERIAL - ROCK BID OPENING: MARCH 27, 1985 = 11:30 A.M. All Items-per ton except 7 - Concrete Sand 1• Buck Shot 2 Gravel Base 3� Limestone 4 Seal -Coat Chi s 5 Ready Mix Bituminous 2331 fine 2341 - x_ CCut -B k As ha� 7 Winter Mix 2331 (7 is per gallon) P.U. D. P.U. D. P.U. D. P.U. D. P.U. D. P.U.- D. P.U. D. P.U. D. P.U. D. P.U. D. Prior Lake Aggregate 1.20 2.80 2.25 4.50 Ed Kraemer & Sons 3.22 ande Northwestern Aggreg.. 1.00 3.54 5.00 7.24 2.50 4.99 Barton Sand & Gravel 2.00 3:15 6.50 8.55 2.20 *3.90 7:50 5.10 Bryan Rock Products 3.35 5.09 Hassen Sand & Gravel 2.90 5.60. 4.10 6.40 13.50 T.C.I. Trap-Rock Inc. 7.09 *12.19 Wm. Mueller & Sons 1.55 4.95 2.25 5.65 119.00 19.00 19.75 28.00 Bury & Carlson, Inc. 3.00 4.25 A.85 22.35 21.10 24.00 21.75 24.2 *27.25 29.75 -Midwest Asphalt Corp 2_.25 4.95 3.25 5.35 Few 19.95 21.95 21.50 23.5C 22.25 24.2E 28.50 31.00 Commercial Asphalt 18.40 24.40 20.95 26.9E 21.40 27.4 Koch Asphalt Co. .n 0 .0 2 Sa -a .97 2.90 4.20 5.90 1.90 4.05 * Based on low bid ** Alternate Bid PRICE COMPARISON INCREASE /DECREASE 1982 1983 1984 1985 82 to 83 83 to 84 84 to 85 Concrete Sand /ton 3.10 2.92 2.90 2.80 -5.8% -.70% -3.4% Buckshot /ton $6.39 $6.15 $5.90 $5.60 -3.7% -4.1% -5.1% Gravel Base /ton $3.85 $3.85 $4.05 $3.90 0 +5.2% -3.7% Limestone /ton $4.40 $4.68 $4.95 $5.07 +6.4% +5.8% +2.4% Seal Coat Chips /ton $11.15 $12.05 $12.20 $12.19 +8.0% +1.2% -0.1% Ready Mix Bituminous /ton $17.50 $17.95 $18.85 $19.85 +2.6% +5.0% +5.84% Cut Back Asphalt /gal. $.90 $1.0222 $1._0222 $1.0222 +13.9% 0 0 Winter Mix $22.50 $24.00 $27.00 $27.25 +7.0% +12.5% +1.5% TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Nanaver SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: March 28, 1985 Material Description (General Specifications): Annual Material Bid for Water.'Treatment Chemicals A. Hydroflui.silicic Acid B.. Liquid Chlorine Quotations /Bids: Company Hydrofluisilicic Liquid 1• li wkins Chemical, Acid Chlorine Inc. 7.95 per cwt. 18.00 per cwt. 2. Dixie. Petro Chemicals, $9.95 per cwt. $19.50 per cwt. Inc. 3. Jones Chemical, Inc: $10.93 per cwt. $27.00 per cwt: Department Recommendation: Ti! C Amount of Quote or Bid $25.95 $29.45 $37.93 Hawkins'Chemical, Inc. i! Public Works - Utility Signat re Department Finance DjreCLor s Endorsement: The recormnended bid is is not within the amount budget for the purchase. J. N. Dal n, Finance Director Ci ty Maryaaer's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the reconrrcndation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an al ternati've: � Kenneth Rosland, C pager M E M O R A N D U M L TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: WOODDALE SCHOOL SITE DATE: March 29, 1985 Per Council direction, the staff has been developing costs to provide information to you as quickly as costs are developed. The first section on which information is available includes the following estimates: Wooddale School demolition - $175,000.00 Site improvement - $ 25,000.00 42 parking spaces on east side of Wooddale Park - $ 35,137.20 (includes construction cost, engineering and capitalized interest) The estimated costs can be offset by the remaining $75,000.00 from the ...School District, $100,000.00 from the Park budget on a four -year $25,000.00 per -year contribution, $25,000.00 from the Developer's Fund, and a proposal to develop an assessed project to St. Stephen's Church for the parking lot similar to the Colonial Church project at Countryside Park. The variance resolution for West 50th Street has been prepared with the supporting documentation to be submitted during the first week of April. The staff would recommend that action be taken on the initial portion of Wooddale Park by authorizing the school demolition and negotiations with St. Stephen's with intent to develop a financing package similar to the Colonial Church /Countryside Park. KR /sw r cc: file Citv Council Rosland Skagerberg Dunwiddie April 1, 1985 MEMORANDUM Re: Edina Historical Society From: Donna Skagerberg Foster Dunwiddie With the decision to demolish Wooddale School, there is a need to find other facilities for the Edina Historical Society. In reviewing alternative locations, several facts should be considered: 1. The Edina Historical Society currently occupies 3,100 sq.ft. on the lower level of Wooddale School. A breakdown of the space occupied by the Society is as follows: Museum Space 625 sq. ft. Work /Research Room 590 Exhibition Gallery 530 Collection Storage 1,350 Total 3,095 sq. ft. 2. The Collection of the Historical Society has grown in size and content in the years since it moved to Wooddale School and can no longer be accommodated in the two buildings at Frank Tupa Park. The Cahill School basement whicl Collection has only 772 sq. ft. space is currently in daily use with the Cahill School program. 4,000 children this school year booked through the end of May. i formerly housed the Society's of available space. This on school days in conjunction That program has attracted and the school is fully The meeting room in the Grange Hall basement contains 689 sq. ft. This space is also in daily use in conjunction with the Cahill School program during the noon hour. It also is used by the Minnehaha Grange and other groups for meetings. The balcony in the Grange Hall contains only 300 sq. ft. and is not, suitable for storage. Y April 1, 1985 Page 2 3. It has been suggested that the Edina Historical Society move to the Edina Community Center. The Edina Historical Society was offered this alternative in 1981 and instead chose the Wooddale School location. The Society felt strongly at the time that it was important to remain near the historic center of the City which grew up around the Edina Mills on West 50th Street. A move to the Community Center places the Society at some distance from the Edina Mills site and the two historic buildings it administers- -the Cahill School and Minnehaha Grange Hall. For these reasons, the Society has not favored a move to the Edina Community Center, assuming 3,000 sq. ft. of suitable space were available in the Center. 4. Several years ago, it was suggested that an underground museum be built between the Cahi•11 School and the Grange Hall at Frank Tupa Park to,connect the two buildings and provide additional space. There is room to build a 40 ft. x 60 ft. underground museum between the two buildings. This would provide 2,400 sq. ft. of additional space to the complex at a cost of approximately :200,000. However, it would make no provision for future expansion and the limited parking space at Frank Tupa Park is a continuing problem. 5. It has also, been suggested that the Cahill School and Grange Hall be moved to Utley Park in the studies presented by BRW. Unfortunately both of the proposed locations in Utley Park fall within the flood plain of Minnehaha Creek. Although portions of the Park are outside of the flood plain, the Society is concerned that basements in this area would be damp and unsuitable for housing the Society's Collections. A more suitable location might be on the north side of West 50th Street directly east of Dwight Williams Park. This area is not subjected to potential flooding and would place the two historic structures adjacent to the Edina Mills site. This portion of the Wooddale School playround appears to be little used. An underground museum facility could be built in this location to connect the two buildings and could also serve as an interpretive center for the Edina Mills site. 6. If the two buildings were to be moved, they would be imme- diately removed from the National Register of Historic Places. This is standard procedure for National Register properties. because of changes in the regulations governing the Register, the State Historic Preservation Office has indicated that it is unlikely that the buildings would be relisted. Unlike the regulations in effect in 1971 when the buildings were placed on the Register, the current regula- tions do not look with favor on listing of buildings that have been moved from their original site. Both the Cahill School and the Grange Hall have been moved from their original sites. The State Historic Preservation Office would discourage moving the buildings but would not actively oppose the move. a April 1, 1985 Page 3 7. Between 1969 and 1979, State and Federal grant monies total- ling $26,900.00 were received by the City of Edina for the restoration of the Cahill School and the Grange Hall. The State Grants Office requires that recipients of grants agree to maintain the structures for a five-year-period. It is the opinion of the State Grants Officer that the City of Edina has fulfilled this obligation and would not be required to refund the grant monies if the buildings were moved from their present site. S. The Collection of the Edina Historical Society contains over 5,000 artifacts that relate directly to the history of Edina. These are held in public trust by the Society who is charged with the responsibility to provide a suitable environment for their care and preservation. This requires a facility that is both secure and climate - controlled. At the same time, the Society has a responsibility to interpret the history of the City. This requires a facility that is open to the public and readily accessible to display the artifacts in the Society's Collection and to provide programs for their interpretation. The Edina Historical Society has tried to diligently carry out these responsibilities since it was established in 1970. We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of the City in help- ing us to meet these goals and look forward to continuing collaboration and support as we move toward the celebration of Edina's Centennial in 1988. TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Enginee VIA: Ken Rosland, City Manager DATE: March 29, 1985 SUBJECT: Feasibility Report, 85 -2 - Set Hearing Date The following improvement has been investigated and it has been deter- mined that it is feasible, and its construction would be in the best interest of the overall development of the City of Edina: P -WM -353 Watermain Westwood Court IMPROVEMENT AND LOCATION ESTIMATED COST $75,559.37 This would be an assessed project. This proposal is a result of a petition. The proposed hearing date is April 15, 1985. FJH:lm N 1 L, TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, City Engineer VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: CSAH 158 (Vernon Avenue) /Blake Road CSAH 158 (Vernon Avenue) /Tracy Avenue Traffic Signals Attached are the resolutions necessary for plan approval and agreement for participation in construction of traffic signals at the above listed locations. The estimated city participation is $95,760.00 with $47,880.00 being a regular state aid funding; $31,920.00 being also a state aid funding with a resolution necessary to expend it on the County Road system; and $15,960.00 estimated as local funds from city budget. Hennepin County will fund $31,920.00 as their normal participation. Staff . recommends approval of the attached resolutions and an additional resolution to expend an estimated $31,920.00 on the County Road system from our Municipal State Aid Funding. FJH:Im 3/29/85 At a duly authorized meeting of the City Council'of Edina, Minnesota, the following resolution was moved and adopted: RESOLUI!ION TAHEREAS, Agreement for participation in the construction and operation of traffic control signal system on County State Aid Highway No. 158 at Tracy Ave., Hennepin County Project No. 8441, Agreement No. PW 04 -11 -85 has been prepared and presented to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESCLVED: That said Agreement be in all things approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Mayor and Manager are authorized to sign Agreement No. PW 04- 11 -85, Hennepin County Project No. 8441. Dated this day of . 19 . CEWIFICATION State of Minnesota County of Hennepin City of Edina I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Edina at a meeting thereof held in the city of Edina, Minnesota on the day of , 19 , as disclosed by the records of said City in my possession. (SEAL) City Clerk At a duly authorized meeting of the City Council of Edina, Minnesota, the following resolution was moved and adopted: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Plans for Hennepin County Project No. 8440 showing proposed traffic control signal system at the intersection of County State Aid Highway 158 and Blake Rd. /Olinger Blvd. for the construction thereof within the limits of the city as a County State Aid project have been prepared and presented to the city. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: That said plans be in all things approved. Dated this day of . 19 . CERTIFICATION State of Minnesota County of Hennepin City of Edina I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Edina at a meeting thereof held in the city of Edina, Minnesota on the day of , 19 , as disclosed by the records of said City in my possession. (SEAL) City Clerk At a duly authorized meeting of the City Council-.of Edina, Minnesota, the following resolution was moved and adopted: RESOLUTION iHEREAS, Agreement for participation in the construction and operation of traffic control signal system on County State Aid Highway No. 158 at Blake Rd/Olinger Blvd., Hennepin County Project No. 8440, Agreement No. PW 03 -11 -85 has been prepared and presented to the City. PDW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: That said Agreement be in all things approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Mayor and Manager are authorized to sign Agreement No. PW 03-U-85#, Hennepin County Project No. 8440. Dated this day of . 19 CERTIFICATION State of Minnesota County of Hennepin City of Edina I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Edina at a meeting thereof held in the city of Edina, Minnesota on the day of , 19 , as disclosed by the records of said City in my possession. (SEAL) City Clerk At a duly authorized meeting of the City Council of Edina, Minnesota, the following resolution was moved and adopted: RESOLUTION V61ERW , Plans for Hennepin County Project No. 8441 showing proposed traffic control signal system at the intersection of County State Aid Highway 158 at Tracy Ave. for the construction thereof within the limits of the city as a County State Aid project have been prepared and presented to the city. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: That said plans be in all things approved. Dated this day of . 19 . CERTIFICATION State of Minnesota County of Hennepin City of Edina I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Edina at a meeting thereof held in the city of Edina, Minnesota on the day of , 19 , as disclosed by the records of said City in my possession. (SEAL) City Clerk At a duly authorized meeting of the City Council of Edina, Minnesota, the following resolution was moved and adopted: t RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Plans for Hennepin County Project No. 8440 showing proposed traffic control signal system at the intersection of County State Aid Highway 158 and Blake Rd. /Olinger Blvd. for the construction thereof within the limits of the city as a County State Aid project have been prepared and presented to the city. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: That said plans be in all things approved. Dated this 4th day of April , 19_.85 CERTIFICATION State of Minnesota County of Hennepin City of Edina I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Edina at a meeting thereof held in the city of Edina, Minnesota on the 1st day of April , 198, as disclosed by the records of said City in my possession. (SEAL) City Clerk At a duly authorized meeting of the City Council of Edina, Minnesota, the following resolution was moved and adopted:- RESOLUTION MUMEAS, Plans for Hennepin County Project No. 8441 showing proposed traffic control signal system at the intersection of County State Aid Highway 158 at Tracy Ave. for.the construction thereof within the limits of the city as a County State Aid project have been prepared and presented to the city. DDW; THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED That said plans be in all things approved. Dated this 4th day of April R 19 85 CERTIFICATION State of Minnesota County of Hennepin City of , Edina I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Edina at a meeting thereof held in the city of Edina, Minnesota on the 1st day of April , 198-5y as disclosed by the record of said City in my possession. (SEAL) City Clerk At a duly authorized meeting of the City Council of Edina, Minnesota, the following resolution Was moved and adopted: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Agreement for participation in the construction and operation of traffic control signal system on County State Aid Highway No. 158 at Blake Ad/Olinger Blvd., Hennepin County Project No 8440, Agreement No. PW 03 -11 -85 has been prepared and presented to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: That said Agreement be in,all things approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Mayor and Manager are authorized to sign Agreement No. PW 03- 11- 85,-Hennepin County Project No. 8440. Dated this 4th day of April 19.85. CERTIFICATION State of Minnesota County of Hennepin City of Edina I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Edina at a meeting thereof held in the city of Edina,, Minnesota on the 1st day of Agril " , 19 85, as disclosed by the records of said City in my possession. City Clerk At a duly authorized meeting of the City Council of Edina, Minnesota, the following resolution was moved and adopted: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Agreement for participation in the construction and operation of traffic control signal system on County State Aid Highway No. 158 at Tracy Ave., Hennepin County Project No. 8441, Agreement No. PW 04 -11 -85 has been prepared and presented to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: That said Agreement be in all things approved. - o BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Mayor and Manager are authorized to sign Agreement No. PW 04- 11 -85, Hennepin County Project No. 8441. Dated this 4th day of April CERTIFICATION State of Minnesota County of Hennepin City of Edina I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a.true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Edina at a meeting thereof held in the city of Edina, Minnesota on the 1st day of April , 19L85 r as disclosed by the records of said City in my possession. City Clerk RESOLUTION Appropriation of Municipal State -Aid Funds To C.S.A.H. Project WHEREAS, It has been deemed advisable and necessary for the City of Edina to participate in the cost of a construction project located on C.S.A.H. No. 158 within the limits of said municipality, and WHEREAS, Said construction project has been approved by the Department of Highways and identified in its records as S.A.P. No. 27- 758 -04, 120 - 152 -07 and 27- 758 -03, 120 - 147 -08; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That we do hereby appropriate from our Municipal State -Aid Street Funds the sum.of $31,920.00 to apply toward the construction of said project and request the Commissioner of Highways to approve this authorization. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a Resolution presented to and adopted by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the 1st day of April, 1985, as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my possession. City Clerk City of Edina, Minnesota TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, City Enginee VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT:. Construction Cooperative Agreement Hennepin County /Edina France Avenue /I -494 Project Attached is a cover letter from Hennepin County requesting your approval of the final piece of paperwork prior to construction starting on the project. Hennepin County is entering into an agreement with Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) to cover all construction costs not borne by MNDOT. The agreement which Hennepin County seeks with us is a sub agreement in which the City agrees to a portion of the cost of the construction. Staff has reviewed the agreement and recommends that the Mayor and Manager be authorized to sign the agreement. This recommendation includes that all city funding be from our Municipal State Aid Funds as determined to be eligible by the State Aid office of MNDOT. FJH:lm 3/29/85 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION " 320 Washington Av. South HENNEPIN Hopkins, Minnesota 55343- 8468 LFU 935 -3381 TTY 935 -6433 March 19, 1985 Mr. Fran Hoffman Director of Public Works City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 AGREEMENT NO. PW 08 -11 -85 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJECT 7927 COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY 17 Dear Mr. Hoffman: Submitted for city approval are two copies of a Construction Cooperative Agreement for the above referenced project. If the agreement is satisfactory, please have both copies signed by the appropriate city officials and return them to this office. Also, please return a certified copy of the resolution authorizing the mayor and manager to sign the agreement. Upon completion of the remaining signatures by county officials, we will send you one fully executed copy for your files. Sincerely, eo ore J. Hof a , P.E. ief Design E gi eer BCC:lar Enclosures HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer At a duly authorized meeting of the City Council of Edina, Minnesota, the following resolution was moved and adopted: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Agreement for participation in the construction on County State Aid Highway No. 17 at I -494, Hennepin County Project No. 7927, Agreement No. PW 08 -11 -85 has been prepared and presented to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: That said Agreement be in all things approved, subject to all funding by the City be from the Municipal State Aid Fund. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Mayor and Manager are authorized to sign Agreement No. PW 08- 11 -85, Hennepin County Project No. 7927. Dated this 4th day of April , 1985. CERTIFICATION State of Minnesota County of Hennepin City of Edina I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Edina at a meeting thereof held in the City of Edina, Minnesota on the day of , 19 , as disclosed by the records of said City in my possession. (SEAL) City Clerk �C- G SPACE STUDY COMMITTEE 1. Jim Curry 2. George Hite 3. Alice O'Connor 4. Wally Olson 5. Lee Otis 6. Jack Rice (2) 7. June Schmidt 8. Bob.Schoening 9. David Sherman (2) 10. Canny Wright 11. Bart Foster 12. Jim Nelson 13. Bud Schoening 14. Bob Copeland 15. Lee Johnson 16. Michael McGlynn 17. Robert Roberts 18. John Curry 19. Cathy Christensen March 21, 1985 Mayor C. Wayne Courtney City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Wayne: ice■ Some suggestions I might have for people to serve on the Space Study Committee include the following: Jim Curry - 4817 Upper Terrace George Hite - 4720 Aspasia Circle Alice O'Connor - 7101 Lanham Lane Wally Olson - 5002 Bruce Avenue Lee Otis - 8827 Basswood Road, Eden Prairie Jack Rice - 4900 IDS Center -- June Schmidt - 7005 Bristol Boulevard Bob Schoening - 4612 Edina Boulevard David Sherman - 19 Circle West Canny Wright - 4600 Sunnyside Road In addition, I would think that Ken Rosland should serve as an ex- officio member. Although Leslie and I have been involved in this study to date, I would think any of the council members could serve on this committee. I of course would be most willing to do so if that would be the wishes of you and the council members. Very truly yours, Frederick S. Richards FSR /dc cc: Marcella Daehn !Marcella, could you circulate copies to the other council members. Thank you. FSR 1055q I - � C.) U c f ­Lk ki e,,- lie, _lye o —'2 13 �%.��� -� -y- TL)'rit� .-� /� ��`Z� (il�1G�,CCcZ� -� - - - -- c.�..c �± `tL�•n�L� L .._C / - -- -- - - — 1 / J 3o c���. v-cl., M E M O R A N D U M DATE: March 28, 1985 TO: Kenneth Rosland FROM: Gordon Hughes SUBJECT: Redevelopment of Mann Drive A(4 -in Theater Property - Bloomington 1 recently received an Environmental Assessment Worksheet, (EAW) for the subject project which is proposed by Homart Development Co. This project proposes 1.5 million square feet of office space and 350 hotel rooms for the 26.3 acre site which includes the Mann Theater and Ramada Inn. The project proposed 5, 100 parking spaces in a five -level parking ramp. The EAW suggests that this project will generate 17, 925 vehicle trips daily. The EAW is the first step in the environmental review process. Because of its size, this project will automatically require an Environmental Impact Statement. The purpose of this memo is to advise the Council of this project which, due to its density, may adversely affect Edina from a traffic and aesthetic standpoint. (This project is about 2 112 times more dense than Edina would permit for offices.) We will attend an April 2 meeting concerning the EAW to learn more about the project. GH /lde .S x 21.0 c SITE PLAN xe.o■ Centarr5u�te 3100 EXPAMDM SUE Arcwrects 6 E esrs L .9 SS west Monroe 1201 Marmon Mace -� Aff ffoea Cnrcago. utrno.s 60603 PNtCF1NG. -- M. a0oW. m 55403 J Homart Oevelooment Comoarly Hammel G. een & Abrahamson Jr RONALD B. SIELOFF WILLIAM A. BIERMAN. JR. ROBERT G. TOEWS PATRICIA L. PETERSON SHEREE BERG SEAVER MICHAEL D. DITTBERNER LYNN J. STARKMAN SIELOFF AND BIERMAN, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 938 MINNESOTA BUILDING FOURTH STREET AND CEDAR SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101 March 28, 1985 Mr. Dick Helmer Mr. LeRoy Lisk Edina Volunteer Firefighters Relief Association 6250 Tracy Avenue Edina, NN? 55426 Dear Dick and LeRoy: TELEPHONE 161 21 224-6840 Enclosed is a copy of Senate File 1292 /House File 1273 introduced in both Houses of the Legislature today. The bill repeals..the..parti.on of the special law relating, to your survivor benefits and allows the state -wide law to govern survivor benefits. The authors of Senate File 1292 are Senators, Storm, Knaak, Jude and Merriam. The authors of the companion House File 1273 are Representatives Forsythe and Pauly. The bill is scheduled for a hearing before the Governmental Operations corwdttee in the House of Representatives on Thursday, April 4, 1985 at 8:00 A.M. If the membership of your association approves the proposed legislation the hearing will go fore,ard next Thursday. The bill does not legally require approval by the Edina City Council because it repeals special legislation and allows state -wide law of general applicability to take its place. It would be most helpful if the Edina City Council did approve - passage of the bill by resolution.. The chief author in the House of Representatives, Mary Forsythe, correctly notes that legislative tradition in the House favors approval of all local bills by the local governing body, in this case the Edina City Council.. V,'P 3 : j Enc. Very tru2,y yours, William A. Bierman, Jr. �r r 3/26/85 [REVISOR ] JCR /LH 85 -2655 1 A bill for an act 2 relating to the city of Edina; providing that 3 survivors' benefits of firemen's service association 4 be paid as provided by general law; repealing Laws 5 1965, chapter 592, section 4, as amended. 6 .. 7 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: 8 Section 1. [REPEALER.) 9 Laws 1965, chapter 592, section 4, as added by Laws 1969, --------------------------------------------------------- 10 chapter 644, section 2, and amended by Laws 1975, chapter 229, -------------------------------------------------------------- 11 section 3, is repealed. 12 Sec. 2. [APPLICABILITY..] 13 Section 1 applies to the city of Edina. --------------------------------------- 14 Sec. 3. [EFFECTIVE DATE; LOCAL APPROVAL.] 15 Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 645.023, 16 subdivision 1, clause (b), section 1 is effective without local ------------------ ------------------------------------------- 17 approval for survivors' benefits paid after July 31, 1985. ----------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- 1 RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Edina Volunteer Firefighter Relief Association was established to provide benefits for Edina's Volunteer Firefighters; and WHEREAS, the Edina Association had been governed under a special law, Laws of Minnesota (1965) Chapter 592, as amended by Chapter 644 (1969), and Chapter 229 (1975); and WHEREAS, the 1979 State Legislature passed the Codified Chapter 424A of Minnesota Statutes to standardize governance and eliminate special laws governing these individual associations, repealing the section of Edina's special law relating to pension benefits; and WHEREAS, House File 1273 /Senate File 1292 repeals the special Edina law relating to survivor benefits. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina supports the passage of House File 1273 /Senate File 1292. ADOPTED this 1st day of April, 1985. zaoz J!t 40 Is pa W�, � - - � (A i: A UP sp v Z10 a\' I — . . 40 Z40. IF 10 -7 . L 0 aw. OXI 0 Of k� 0%* ol w ISO ILL— q8.4 2 - J5 ez ON 780 �5; ALU 1 7 0 00 i 93 r 9.3 'A 7. I G H l, Ito 12b 1 117 ti 141m zOz 100 c 95 64 5, -14 old d"C'- Q TO— Z R S 0 NIS jr C. 1 00 100 13 9=771 - I I13.: , I a IJIGHWOOD N2•s1' , 1 .1 1 10 w3.3 4.. .5— 4 4* o- lot 4 1 1 .1 q-1 B4. 11 ..57.5 9. 0 -9b m R ro !Si 1645 4, UP EDINA HI HLAN Izi 'A A. oor �" L. a. 58.88 I! 1 S W IV 11 �Qw 4p HEATHER"TAN t 125 Ib'd 201.75 .1 - /!�O 135 31 10 M 00.0 4,01 "r 0, ' • % .. WOOD " B3 N 1 93 226.55 c 17// 1- 00 dAf,f';,. IRR R L AiKESMEADOW-Ill'001) so lt� — 4 Im 034 W Ito ld M."ll '41 4,5*,, ' - P'5-04�� C /00 JIA(-4 ej 4f ff#- o/ .5-0' 0,40 ROAD sEcOffD'-q-J A 78 U All 46 E D. T OINA tBIG LANDS OP*4o� 7 144 13�. 54 f 86 09 10 'MIRF?01? CO 91 7 ► j#Z.j'L 0 4 kES '75", W.1" w I, &DR. X 2S' --DE M I INK % % At 0 JON OTTE RLEI 4704 MERILANE - EDINA, ANN. 55436 March 25.1985 City Clerk of Edina 4801 West 50th. Street Edina, MN. 55424 Subject: Lot 8, Block 3 Crocker Dear Mrs. Daehn & Crowells First Addition I spoke with you a couple of days ago regarding above, subject. . Would you please initiate the required papers to have the Council pass a resolution to approve the return of above land to the County or State so that Itor any one elselmay be in the position to purchase said land, for the purpose of building a single or duplex home, whatever is proper for the sight. As you know I spoke with your Engineering Department who said they no -longer need this property for drainage. Your Developement Department had no objection in building on this property. The size of the lot is 100 ft.x200 ft. and your requirements are 75 ft, x 120 ft. minimum. Your prompt attention to this matter is greatly .,appreciated. Should you need further information, please do not hasetate to call me; 925- 4265.or 925 -1270. Thank you.' Yours truly bn Otterlei ` PS. Above Property is located at Lynn Avenue and Little Street, Morningside, I believe on page # 3 of your map. d 16,j 421 19 J3�� 21 1 � t� • ' ro RO 2 ac 200 0 200 400 li a U. Qee C�s/ �? 0 2 scale feet LLY VY e,0 N z00 200 . , on.•. -�k� 0 �0 0 ,o WOOD 8 0 ///// A E � "_5`HE 16 G HT' _. 1" 21 6 2ND ADD. Zoo 12 1 �5 1 Iln 2 = ��d9 r�� �n9Si 4 12 e 8 5 7 n 2 16 6 00`, 0 19 8 0 ///// 18 9 17 3 10 16 11 15 12 21 6 o °0 14 13 0° Zoo zoo s 26 1 0 25 2 °o 24 3 23 4 I 22 5 21 6 20 7 190 —QP— 8 18 — 9 17 10 I I 16 1 11 1 .I IS 12 0 14 0 ` zoo 13 0 Zoo ` 4 MORNINGSIDE i00 oo P s 'ies, d . DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION CONVEYANCE OF FORFEITED LANDS (Issued pursuant to Laws 1941, Chapter 511) THIS INDENTURE, made this 6th day of August 194 3, between the State of Minnesota, as party of the first part, and The Village of Liorningside, an incorporated Village in Hennepin County as party of the second part, WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the land hereinafter described was duly forfeited to the State of Minnesota for the nonpayment of taxes, and WHEREAS, pursuant to Laws 1941, Chapter 511, the party of the second part has / applied to the Commissioner of Taxation for the conveyance of lands hereinafter des - Y cribed to be used by its exclusively for drainep.!e nurnoses and WHEREAS, the :;oard of County Commissioners of the County of HENNEPIN , State of Minnesota, has recommended to the Commissioner of Taxation by resolution adopted on the 26th day of July 194 3, that such conveyance be made, NOW, THEREFORE, The State of Minnesota, pursuant to said laws and'in considera- tion of the premises, does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the party.of -the second part, forever, all the tracts or parcels of land lying and being in the County of HiJdN =I'IN , State of Minnesota, described as follows, to -wit: Lots eight (8) and nineteen (19), Block three (3), Crocker and Crowell's First Addition -to the Village of Morningside, TO HAVE AND TO HOLD THE SAME, together with all the heredita:r,ents and BnDur- tenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, to the said party of,the second part so'long Be it shall continue to use said land for the purposes aforesaid, v _ and upon condition that if such use shall cease said land shall revert to the party of the first part. - IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the State of Minnesota, party of the first part, has caused this deed to be executed in its name by the Co issioner of Taxation at the Capitol ' LCity f St. P aul in said state and n year first above written. In press T TE OF MINMS , y / Commissioner of T tion STATE OF MINNESOTA ) SS COUNTY OF RAMSEY J On this 6t,h day of AllMlst 194x_, before me personally. apreAred G. HOWARD SPAETH, Commissioner of Taxation of the State of Minnesota, to me knovaz to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument in behalf of the state of N.iz.nesota, and acknowledged that he executed the same as the free act anc deed of said state pursuant to the statutes in such case made and provided ,) ,,' . fl. M. MACCRAW, Notary Pui, :ic, Ramsey County, Minn. My Commi�aioo F*picea June 3, 1950. V / 13 PETITION / TO THE HONORABLE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA: GENTLEMEN: The undersigned are the owners of all the property ab=t-+ ti*g "74 �S(Q & &A, G Gad 7 b � �� �JP /�- <��� /�� ✓t, and and hereby petition the Council to construct s PJr/f/ J to service their properties and to assess 100% of the cost thereof against their properties. Dated ''2 g TURE OF OIdNERS ADDRESS DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY -52 %- VILLA 4G D2 Ea i—A ilk �`} R -81 r ESTIMATE OF COST CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. P -WM -354 LOCATION: Blocks 6 & 7, Findell Clark Addition HEARING DATE: April 1, 1985 ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $12,142.20 (Includes Engineering, Clerical & Interest NUMBER OF ASSESSABLE LOTS: '11 ESTIMATED COST PER ASSESSABLE LOT: $1,103.82 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT March 22, 1985 LOT BLOCK ADDITION. PINS NUMBERS 1 2 Findell Clark Addition 08- 116 -21 -12 -0042 2 6 08- 116 -21 -12 -0043 3 6 08- 116 -21 -12 -0044 4 6 08- 116 -21 -12 -0045 5- 6 08- 116- 21- 12 -0046- 1 7 08- 116 -21 -12 -0047 2 7 08- 116 -21 -12 -0048 3 7 08- 116 -21 -12 -0049 4 7 "" 08- 116 -21 -12 -0050 5 .7 08- 116 -21 -12 -0051 6 7 08- 116 -21 -12 -0052 UNIT QUANTITY MATERIAL PRICE TOTAL 320 L /F, 6" D.I.P. Watermain Cl. 55 @ $14.00 $4,480.00 60 L /F, 12" Copper @ 8.00 480.00 200 L /F, 1" Copper House Services @ 7.00 1,400.00 1 Each, Std. Hydrant with Valve, Box& Cover @ 1,100.00 1,100.00 T J Page 2 Estimate of Cost Watermain City of Edina Improvement No. P -WM -354 PREPARED BY CHECKED BY SUB- TOTAL: $.9,590.00 ADD 10% ENGINEERING & 2% CLERICAL: 1,324.34 10,914.34 ADD 11.25% CAPITALIZED INTEREST: 1,227.86 ESTIMATED'TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $12,142.20 rancis J. Hoff n, P.E. Director of Public Work 0 and City Engineer UNIT QUANTITY MATERIAL PRICE TOTAL 2 Each, 6" Gate Valve with Box & Cover @ $300.00 $600.00 2 Each, 6" x 6" C.I. Tee @ 200.00 400.00 2 Each, 6" C.I. 1/16 Bend @ 60.00 120.00 1 Each, 6" Plug with.l2" Tap & Corporation @ 75.00 75.00 11 Each, 1" Corporation Taps & Stops'' @ 25.00 275.00 11 Each, 1" Curb Stops & Boxes' @ 60.00 660.00 PREPARED BY CHECKED BY SUB- TOTAL: $.9,590.00 ADD 10% ENGINEERING & 2% CLERICAL: 1,324.34 10,914.34 ADD 11.25% CAPITALIZED INTEREST: 1,227.86 ESTIMATED'TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $12,142.20 rancis J. Hoff n, P.E. Director of Public Work 0 and City Engineer March 22, 1985 ESTIMATE OF COST CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. P -SS -369 LOCATION: Blocks 6 & 7, Findell'C1ark'Addition HEARING DATE: April 1, 1985 ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $9,219.15 (Includes Engineering, Clerical & Interest NUMBER OF ASSESSABLE LOTS: 11 QUANTITY MATERIAL ESTIMATED COST PER--ASSESSABLE LOT: $838.10 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LOT BLOCK- ADDITION L /F, 8" V.C.P. PINS NUMBERS 1 6 Findell Clark Addition 08- 116 -21 -12 -0042 2 6 " " " It -0043 3 6 It @ It -0044 4 6 It it it " -0045 5 6 It �� �� It -0046 1 �� �� �� �� ,0047 2 7 11 It -0048 3 7 �� �� �� It -0049 4 7 �� �� �� -0050 5 7 �� �� �� -0051 6 7 " " " It -0052 UNIT QUANTITY MATERIAL PRICE TOTAL 20 L /F, 8" V.C.P. 8 -10' Depth @ $10.00 $ 200.00 159 L /F, 8" V.C.P. 10 -12' Depth @ 12.00 1,908.00 20 L /F, 8 "_ V.C.P. 12 -14' Depth @ 16.00 320.00 3 Each, Standa -rd 0 -8' Manholes with Frame & Cover @ 1,000.00 3,000.00 60 V /.F Extra Manhole Wall 85.00 510.00 Page 2 Estimate of Cost Sanitary Sewer City of Edina, Minnesota Improvement No. P -SS -369 March 22, 1985 PREPARED BY. ;ro CHECKED BY _O SUB- TOTAL: $7,399.00 ADD 10% ENGINEERING AND 2% CLERICAL: 887.88 8,286.88 ADD 11.25% CAPITALIZED INTEREST: 932.27 ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION: - $9,219.15 rancis J. Hoffma P...E. Director of Publ c Works bp and City Engineer UNIT QUANTITY MATERIAL PRICE TOTAL 11 Each, 8" x 4" V.C. Tees @ $25.00 $275.00 80 L /F, 4" Cast Iron House Service @ 14.00 1,120.00 11 Each, 4" Cast Iron Plugs @ 6.00 66.00 PREPARED BY. ;ro CHECKED BY _O SUB- TOTAL: $7,399.00 ADD 10% ENGINEERING AND 2% CLERICAL: 887.88 8,286.88 ADD 11.25% CAPITALIZED INTEREST: 932.27 ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION: - $9,219.15 rancis J. Hoffma P...E. Director of Publ c Works bp and City Engineer March 22, 1985 ESTIMATE OF COST CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S. -175 LOCATION: Blocks 6 & 7, Findell Clark Addition HEARING,DATE: April 1, 1985 QUANTITIY MATERIAL ESTIMATED COST OF. CONSTRUCTION: $5,980.00 (Includes Engineering, Clerical '& Interest NUMBER OF ASSESSABLE LOTS: 11 0 -6; Depth @ $14.00 ESTIMATED COST PER ASSESSABLE'LOT: $543.64 Catch Basin @ 900.00 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT Each, Type "D" Catch Basin @ LOT BLOCK ADDITION PINS NUMBERS 1 6 Findell Clark Addition 08- 116 -21 -12 -0042 2 6 it 08- 116 -21 -12 -0043 3 6 08- 116 -21 -12 -0044 4 6 It 08- 116 -21 -12 -0045 5 6 It It 08- 116 -21 -12 -0046 1 7 it 08- 116 -21 -12 -0047 2 7 '.' 08- 116 -21 -12 -0048 3 7 08- 116 -21 -12 -0049 4 7 It 08- 116 -21 -12 -0050 5 7 It 08- 116 -21 -12 -0051 6 7 08- 116 -21 -12 -0052 UNIT QUANTITIY MATERIAL PRICE TOTAL 150 L /F, 12" R.C.P. 0 -6; Depth @ $14.00 $2,100.00 1 Each, Type "C" Catch Basin @ 900.00 900.00 1 Each, Type "D" Catch Basin @ 800.00 800.00 1 Each, Remove & Reconstruct Wood Reaining Wall & @ Lump Sum 11000.00 Shrubs • 4 Page 2 of 2 Pages Estimate of Cost City of Edina, Minnesota Improvement No. St.S. -175 SUB - TOTAL: ADD 10% ENGINEERING & 2% CLERICAL: ADD 11.25% CAPITALIZED INTEREST: ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION: PREPARED BY CHECKED BY F ancis J. Hoff an, Director of Public Wo.kV and City Engineer March 22, 1985 $4,800.00 576.00 5,376.00 $5,980.80 1=1R M E M O R A N D U M L r TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: WINE ORDINANCE DATE: March 29, 1985 At your last Council Meeting, you had passed First Reading of the Wine Ordinance without any amendments on a four -to -one vote. It appeared, based on your discussions, that there were still some areas that you would like to change from First Reading, and after discussions with our City Attorney, it is recommended that the following procedure be undertaken: a) That any amendments to the language in the First Reading be amended prior to passage of Second Reading. b) That if you desire passage of Second Reading on Monday evening, you do so and we will draft appropriate language from there. c) That some action or indication be given regarding fees that you would like to undertake as part of Ordinance 171 in order that we may go ahead to inform prospective licensees what charges they will be facing. Should you have any other further questions, please feel free to contact Mark or me. KR /sw M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Member FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager / SUBJECT: 911 AUTOMATIC LOCATION IDENTIFICATION DATE: March 29, 1985 As you may recall, when the 911 System was put in place in December of 1982, there were three levels of service available. The first one was automatic routing, in which a telephone dialing 911 anywhere in Edina would be automatically routed to Edina's dispatch office. The second feature was automatic number identification (ANI), in which the telephone number of the calling party would be displayed at the dispatch center. The third level was automatic location identification (ALI), in which the address of the calling number would be displayed at the dispatch office. The agreement, to the understanding of the cities when 911 was established, _ was that the State would pick up the automatic routing costs together with the funding for the ANI service. The cost for ALI equipment at our dispatch point was to be funded by us, and it was our understanding that the initial capital cost, together with the ongoing servicing costs of the central computer for ALI, would be funded by the counties. On this basis, we went ahead and entered into a contract to pay for our ALI equipment. In about June of 1983, we were informed by Northwestern Bell that Hennepin County had been released from their contract to pay for the ALI ongoing charges and that they were attempting to come to the cities to collect those charges at a rate of about $450 per month. It was the independent dispatching points in Hennepin County's contention that this was the County's respon- sibility and agreement on their part to pick it up. For the past year and nine months, the independent PSAP's have been attempting to reach a compromise with the County regarding the service with Northwestern Bell, who on occasion had threatened to withdraw the ALI portion of the service. Within the last two weeks, the County has finally agreed to accept the compromise that the cities had proposed last summer which was the County's pick -up of all the ALI costs up through July 1, 1984, and that from there on the individual cities would pick up their own respective costs. While the independent PSAP's also encouraged the County to pro -rate the cost of the Sheriff's ALI costs against the dependent dispatch points, this was not taken into account so that Edina in addition to paying its own ALI costs also pays approximately 10% of the Sheriff's ALI costs (as is true for the entire Sheriff's radio network for which we get little benefit). While on the surface it may not seem to be a good deal for Edina, it is in the best interest of the Edina taxpayer, March 29, 1985 Mayor Courtney & Council Members Page Two since Edina does make up approximately 9% of the County tax base, and so under the compromise they end up paying approximately $6,000 to $7,000 a year for ALI., including the Sheriff's portion, but would pay in the range of $12,000 to $14,000 if it was continued to be paid by the County. It is our recommendation that the attached resolution be ratified and that when Northwestern Bell does come forth with a contract amendment, that that be ratified and the appropriate billings be paid. Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact either Mark or me. KR /sw C. �. •s J RESOLUTION NO. 85 -3 -94 R2 The following resolution was offered by Commissioner Robb, seconded by Commissioner Johnson: WHEREAS, the emergency 911 system and its lifesaving capabilities is of great value to the citizens of Hennepin County, and WHEREAS, the automatic location feature of 911 has considerably enhanced that lifesaving capability, and WHEREAS, the municipalities operating the public safei;y answering points and the County have been in disagreement as to the financial responsibility for the automatic location feature. BE IT RESOLVED, that Hennepin County will pay Automatic Location Identi- fication (ALI) costs through June 30, 1984 for those municipalities which agree to accept financial responsibility for all ALI costs from that date forward, and provided further that this offer shall remain firm until June 30, 1985. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the appropriate amount be transferred from Contingency to the Information Services Department for payment of ALI costs upon receipt of written agreements from the individual municipalities and that the Controller be authorized to disburse funds. The question was on the adoption of the resolution and there were Seven YEAS and No NAYS as follows: COUNTY OF HENNEPIN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS YEA NAY OTHER Randy Johnson X John Keefe X John E. Derus X E. F. Robb, Jr. X Sam S. Sivanich . X Mark Andrew X Jeff Spartz, Chairman X RESOLUTION ADOPTED. ATTEST: X- Clerk � o V Ii Count Board- OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR A -2300 Government Center HENNEPIN Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 LFU March 26, 1985 Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland Edina City Manager 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Rosland: SPIN 2 O W �\ ryNESO On March 14, the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners approved a reso- lution to pay 911 ALI arrearages through June 30, 1984. The resolution requires that as a condition of payment the individual municipalities must agree to accept the responsibility for 911 ALI charges from that date on. The resolution also is time limited to June 30, 1985. The arrearage for the'City of Edina as of June 30, 1984 is $8,242.21. Enclosed is a copy of the resolution and a recommended agreement to be signed accepting the responsibility for ALI charges from July 1, 1984. Should you have any questions regarding the settlement of this issue, please contact me at 348 -7574. incerely, �i i Da a A. Ackmann County Administrator kos cc Bill Koniarski, Chairman, Metropolitan 911 Telephone Board Dick Moon, Northwestern Bel �Z� '7�1' JJ, os1.�L1 i A — J1 �o HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer 1C. ;.. •s J RESOLUTION NO. 85-3-94 R2 The following resolution was offered by Commissioner Robb, seconded by Commissioner Johnson: WHEREAS, the emergency 911 system and its lifesaving capabilities is of great value to the citizens of Hennepin County, and WHEREAS, the automatic location feature of.911 has considerably enhanced that lifesaving capability, and WHEREAS, the municipalities operating the public safety answering points and the County have been in disagreement as to the financial responsibility for the automatic location feature. BE IT RESOLVED, that Hennepin County will pay Automatic Location Identi- fication (ALI) costs through June 30, 1984 for those municipalities which agree to accept financial responsibility for all ALI costs from that date forward, and provided further that this offer shall remain firm until June 30, 1985. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the appropriate amount be transferred from Contingency to the Information Services Department for payment of ALI costs upon receipt of written agreements from the individual municipalities and that the Controller be authorized to disburse funds. The question was on the adoption of the resolution and there were Seven YEAS and No NAYS as follows: COUNTY OF HENNEPIN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS YEA NAY OTHER Randy Johnson X John Keefe X John E. Derus X E. F. Robb, Jr. X Sam S. Sivanich X Mark Andrew X Jeff Spartz, Chairman X RESOLUTION ADOPTED. ATTEST: Clerk of, lie __� Count Board Commissioner Jeff Spartz Chairman, Hennepin County Board of Commissioners A -2400 Government Center Minneapolis, MN 55487 -0240 Dear Commissioner Spartz: We have received the resolution approved by the Hennepin County Board on March 14, 1985. The City of Edina agrees to accept the County offer to pay arrearages for 911 ALI charges through June 30, 1984; acknowledges the value of the 911 ALI feature; and agrees to pay charges from July 1, 1984 forward. Sincerely, Edina City Manager CITY OF Pon EDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424" 612 - 927 -8861 RP.gOT.TTTTOM WHEREAS, the City of Edina and the other independent PSAP's in Hennepin County initially selected the ALI feature of 911, in part based on the County's apparent agreement to refund the monthly service charges related to ALI, and WHEREAS, Hennepin County has adamantly refused to pay those charges as an obligation since the inception of 911, and WHEREAS, a majority of the independent PSAP's proposed a compromise in which Hennepin County would pick up all charges up through June 30, 1984, and WHEREAS, in that compromise the City of Edina would pay the applicable. monthly charges for the ALI service in addition to the equipment charges they are already paying from July 1, 1984 forward, and WHEREAS, it is of greater benefit to the taxpayers of the City of Edina, Edina pay its own charges rather than having the County pay its charges even though the City of Edina taxpayers still pay a portion of the ALI costs for the dependent cities; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina agrees to the compromise ratified by the Hennepin County Board on March 14, 1985 relevent to 911 ALI charges. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN,), SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 1, 1985, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 11th day of April, 1985. City Clerk _l 1955 CITY OF EDINA CHECAMA DALE AMOALNT CHECK REGISTER urunne r�u 04 -01 -85 PAGE 1 M ACCOUuT Nn- Tpuv- m p O 1LMESSAGE 2 Q77i90 03/19/85 53 *76 CERT POWER TRAIN REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 071090, - U3/1_9/85__ _- _327.7.4- CE -RT POYE3 -TRAIN REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 4 077090 03/19/85 313.18 CERT POWER TRAIN REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 a 694.68 • ' ° •a *ra* -'--- - - *•* -CKS ' L91Qh,8 03/25/85. 23.08 KA�AjV_BEA3ING B SPL_Y REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 ° U91008 03/25/85 36.93 KAMAN BEARING & SPLY PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 " 65.01 * ** -CKS 091012___- x.3/19/85_ _24.95_ AUTOMO @_ILE SERVICE C CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 091U12 03/19/95 24.95 AUTOMOBILE SERVICE C CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 49.90 U91013 03/25/85 21.24 ALTERNA;T04 REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 301 -30 ° 091013 U3/25185 69.66 ALTERNAITOR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 - 0910- 13__ -__- 03/19185 35.45- - ALTER REBUIL�J REPAIR PARTS 1D- 4540 - 560 -5.6 126.35 • :4 aaa *rr •! ***- CKS.- -- -- 091020 03/19/85 34.72 AIR HYDRAULIC SYSTEM GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 325 -30 2' - -_ 791020_ 03/25195. -J. -� _68.00- AIR HYO RAUL ICL$YST -M PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 2 102.72 _- ar *r *• _ * ** -CKS 091026 03/26/85 19059.13 BADGER METER INC REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 803 -80 091026 03/26/85 _ 15.34 BADGER METER INC REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540.807 -80 3' 19074.47 * - - -- -- ---- - =° rrr *ra *** -CKS F '^ 091U33 03/20185 49.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50.4626- 822 -82 091U33_ 03/20/85 177.75 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626- 842 -84 1O t�91U33 U3/2G/85 126.90 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626- 862 -86 47 354.15 091034 03/19/115 3.01 BLOOMINGTON CHRY -PLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 4` 4, 3.01 4' r *ra•• 40 9 8' L85 100.00 GEORGE BUTLER POLICE SERV 10- 4100 - 420 -42 4^ 100.00 • s+ - ...►.. -- * ** -CKS 5•_ -- - -- - - -- 53 0,91041 U3/19/85 432.00 BURY & CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 10 -4524- 301 -30 S4 091041 03/19185 648.00 BURY & CARLSON INC GEN SUPPLIES 40.4504- 803 -80 5' s° ° 19080.00 � r * *aa *** -CKS -1 1985 C OF EDINA * r .y s CHECK TER 04 -01 -85 GE 2 I'll- [— . - quid . .cn ucacrtr un p -rnum N 7NV A Y 9.•��5E- S�.AG� J a -- Oy1.Q4.4- ci3./_25L85__ _- _�9.600.D0 _ - BLLL- flDYE3_FORD ' CAP-IT_ L AUTLAY 20- 201.0- 000 -00 9.600.00 • --- - - - - -- ° 091U47 03/25/85 97.10 BROWN PHOTO PHOTO SUPPLIES 10- 4508 - 421 -42 345.80_ R OWN- -¢WOTO PHOTQ_SUPPLIES 10- 4508 - 421 -42 ,c- u 442.90 + ---- - - ---- - - * *+ -CKS -- 1. 03/26/85 8300 BURESH, ROBERT CONFERENCE 10- 4206 - 440 -44 ,r tw**►w * *•-CKS — 091054 03/19/85 83.16 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 " 091054 U3/19/85 52.50 BATTERY WAREHOUSE PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 Q91054 U3/25f-85 ---- _— __ -31.0tl BATTERY _WAREHOUSE — PARIS. 10 -4620- 560 -56 ' 091054 03/25/85 91.80 BATTERY WAREHOUSE PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 Z�091054 03/25/85 91.80 BATTERY WAREHOUSE PARTS 10-4620-560-W 'Z QL10S4 03/25,85_ 91- .9.2 —_ 442.18 + RATT::RT iIAR� -HOUSE PARTS r 10- 4620 - 560 -56 z. *** -_CKS -- ` to C91058 03/27-/85 100.00 WAYNE BENNETT POLICE 10 -4100- 420 -42 3: 33 *•r*r* I *** -CKS �a 091072 03/20/85 42.16 DAILY CONST REPORTS ADVERTISING 10- 4210- 140 -14 — 42.16 I 3' 31 * *+ -CKS J° _ — ^.41L?_4 Q3/25L85 1_9312.50- ct1Y OF RLD�HIN6LON CONLSEB.V 10- 420.0 - 'L 091 ^74 03/20/85 110.00 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON KENNEL SERVICES _50050 10- 4278- 470 -47 41 42 19422.50 • 43 as ****t* * ** -CKS °' (191077 03- /2U185 70_.25 TO.25 • CMI R.EFLT-G RATION F$UTP MAINT 50- 4274 - 841 -H4 - - - - -- - aC "° rl ZR 11 1 12oiR5 372. 5.0 372.50 * rnrA rni A Rnm TNr roN ccsTnuc 8- 4624- 704 -70 °' 5c - - - -'- - -.* *_CKS - -- 52 S3 091082 03/2G/85 32.30 CONWAY FILE 8 SAFETY EQUIPMENT MAINT 10- 4274 - 420 -42 091Ub7 091082 -all-25-LB 5 43/2U/ -85 35_..50 26.25 rn wAY FTiE R SAFETY CONWAY FIRE 8 SAFETY EQUIP MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINT 10-4274- 42, -42 10- 4276- 421 -42 " " 94.05 + f 1985. CITY OF EDINA .1 ° 091090 L3/25/85 - e ° #rrrrr 9 091099 03/20185 " 091 ^99 43/20/85 091099 0,3/2U/85 Wit.... U91 10 6 03/27/85 ^-4- 2n r + + ## 2. 2- - U91114 L'3/25/85 1' 091114 03/19/85 12.1 z, 82.60 82.60 + CHECK REGISTER CERT POWER TRAIN PARTS 10-4620-560-56 04 -01 -85 PAGE 3 p P.O. q MESSAGE___ - - - -- - - * *.* -CKS __ • +* -CKS 28.76 CUSHMA•N MOTOR CO i REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 662 -66 25.60 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 662 -66 —69.44 EUSHMAN MOTOR CO REPAIR PARTS 27 -4540- 662 -66 60.80 * - - - -- - -- -- _. - - ++* -CKS 100 * 10 DAHL- MR WILDING POLICE SERV 10- 4100- 420 -42 100.00 * .. 28.92 35.50 64.42 + DELEGARD TOOL CO OELEGARD TOOL CO GEN SUPPLIES TOOLS 10 -4504- 301 -30 10 -4580- 560 -56 t Q91125 091125 03/26/85 03/26785 139.65 90.30 MERIT SU ?PLY GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 325 -30 091125 03125/85 18.27 MERIT MERIT SUPPLY SUPP ?4Y GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 540 -54 0911 25 03/25/85 936.66- MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 45_04- 627 -62 091125 03/25/85 936.64 MERIT SUPPLY CORRECTION 10- 4564- 985 -90 __091125 _ 03/261 -_85 _ 655.20__ MrRITSUPPLY CHEMICALS 10- 4564 - 985 -90 091125 03/25/85 39407.85 MERIT SUPPLY WEED -SPRAY WEED SPRAY 10- 4566- 64- 2 -64__ 091125 03/25/85 19503.33 MERIT SUPPLY TRASH CANS 10- 4566- 642 -64 091125 03/19[85 437.25 MERIT SUPPLY PARTS 10- 4602 - 644 -64 091125 091125 03/19/85 03/19/85 416.00 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4620 - 560 -56 28 -4512- 708 -70 S! 91125_ ___03/2 5/ 85_ 388.50 67.13 MERIT MERIT SUPPLY SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES .28- 4512 - 708 -70 091125 03/19/85 58.78 MERIT SUPPLY CLagN2N6 SUPPLIES 28- 4512 - 708 -70 _ 091125 03/25/85 936 *64 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 28 -4512- 708 -70 8.-116.90 CHEMICALS 60- 4564- 985 -90 * ** -CKS • * ** -CKS • • I- • _ C K S • 51 *35 DAIRY HOME CONCESSIONS 28- 4624.704 -70 51.30 + - ri * ** -CKS 143.50- ASPLUVD OFF E CONFESSIONS 28- 4624- 704 -70 143.50 -`-k- nz?- — I 275.02 MMNESOTA'AS50C OF ASSESS DUES 10 -4204- 200 -20 1 IDFF7 RS > 4W r -- 091128 03/25/85 # # # #. # " 52 091131 _03/20/85 091 735 03/20/85 * ** -CKS • * ** -CKS • • I- • _ C K S • 51 *35 DAIRY HOME CONCESSIONS 28- 4624.704 -70 51.30 + - ri * ** -CKS 143.50- ASPLUVD OFF E CONFESSIONS 28- 4624- 704 -70 143.50 -`-k- nz?- — I 275.02 MMNESOTA'AS50C OF ASSESS DUES 10 -4204- 200 -20 1 IDFF7 RS > 4W r J V 19R5 C, OF EDINA rurry .n CHECK i. iTER 04 -01 -85 GE 4 J 275.00 * j Oy1136 U3127/85 886.50 EARL F ANDERSEN SIGNS 10- 4542 - 325 -30 ' s X386.50 * 7 o **+ -CKS I _ -399 75 -_ ED.INA- ELECJRI.0 Co CDxJ REPAIRS 28- 4248 -708 ° 39.75 * " 091141 03/26/85 39915.25 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS PAPER SUPPLIES 10- 2010- 000 -00 ' �! -- - - - - -- - - -3 9-915 . 2-5- * -- -- -- - - -- . - n riff►! ie i*i -CKS U91148 03/20/85 60.00 ELVIN SAF_TY SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 440 -44 091148 03/20/85 133.75 ELVIV SAF_TY SUPPLY COMMUNITICNS 29- 4500 - 720 -72 - 94.50__ ELVIX-GAFI`T-f__SURRLY GF.ILSS1PPlIES 40- 4504.802 -80 -_____ 278.25 _ _ -_. __ I�� 1 24 - -_- - fir- CKS_ -� z -, °I 091157 03/20/85 10.00 50TH FRANCE BUS ASSN MEETING EXPENSES 50- 4206 - 820 -82 27I- - --- -- - - -- - 10..0.0. - - *- ._.._...- - - - - - - -- - -- - - -- - - za ifiifi ao * ** -CKS 091141 0.3/25/85 606.85 GENERAL SPORTS UNIFORM ALLOYENCE 10- 4266- 420 -42 1 " 606.85 J4 !!riff 3- J * **-CKS f 19 94* - -U.3L2518 -! .52.10 GENE13A.L_C NKUNI- CA.LNS CONI -R 19- 42.48 -560 6 091194 03/25/85 381930 GENETAL COMMUNICATNS RADIO SERVICE 10- 4294 - 440 -44 433.10 + °I ° 26/85 16.26 GnPlIERS SHOOTERS TARGETS 29- 4648- 720 -72 <3 °" 16.76 + i °' -_091 2]..3.. - -- 0.3/25!_85 3.00 -. - KATHY- KARDELL MEETING - EXPENSE 4 091ZU3 03/25/85 16.07 KATHY KARDELL MEETING EXPENSE 10- 4206 - 160 -16 °' 091203 03/25/85 3.75 KATHY KARDELL MEETING EXPENSE 10- 4206 - 420 -42 n 9.1--2 e3 031.25/_85 1.3.50 KATHL- KAEOELL MEEII.N6_- E.XP_E.N.S.E 10- 420.6- 42_L_42 -� ° 091203 03/25/85 1.00 KATHY KARDELL MEETING EXPENSE 10- 4206 - 600 -60 U91203 03/25/85 7.40 KATHY KARDELL MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 160 -16 " _- _09120 -3.. -- 03/25/85_ . 12.61 KATHY - KARDELL GEN-SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 301_ -30 52 091203 03/25/85 19.34 KATHY KARDELL GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 420 -42 " 091203 03/25/85 1.05 KATHY KARDELL GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 500 -50 - 1_Z-0-3 Q3J-Z5-U-5 4 .36 KAIHL_KASDELL G.�N SULLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 091203 03/25/85 65.00 KATHY KARDELL POSTAGE 23- 4290 - 610 -61 j 76 091203 03/25/85 2.74 KATHY KARDELL POSTAGE 40 -4290- 800 -80 i • 1985' CITY OF EDINA rucry un nA r CHECK REGISTER 04 -01 -85 PAGE 5 - - -- - - -- ._* .. -CKS - - -- -..— �. - - ^.:1V_.1..- _— _— . -__._— •k1YlliJ� rTLM OES�RIPTION AcCQU NQH o_1.N_V.eJI�._0_. —N_ MESSAGE.- - - - -_. 2 J 151.81 + ' * **-CKS ' 091209 03/19/85 5.2.3 GEIyUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 5_60 -56 ° 09 1209 03/25/85 16.66 GENUIN= PARTS PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 21.83 * ** -CKS " — 09121 3 03/27/85 240.00 —LEROY N__jjpX - -- WAGES 40- 4200 - 800 -80 # t f * f f 091228 03/19/85 36.25 MILLSTROM AUTO SUP Y SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 091228 03/19185 1 444.33 HILLSTROM AUTO SUP Y REPAIR PARTS 10- 454_0 - 56_0 -56 20 091228 U3/19/85 767.54 1HILlSTROM AUAUTO SUP Y REPAIR PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 _ – 091228 03/19185 33.15 HILLSTROM AUTO SUP Y GEN SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 — - - -- --- - - - - -- 29281.27 r + ++–CKS 091242 03/20/85 68.82 HYDRAULIC SERV EUUIP MAINT 27- 4274 - 662 -66 — 2 68.82 i * ** -CKS 1O Q91244 03/25!85 14.90 HAYDEN MURPHY GEN SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 J: 14.90 - -- 091248 03/19/85 157.45 HARM'3N GLASS CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 'r 091248 03/19/85 51.52 HARMON GLASS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 646 -64 ,e 248.97 . ' — - - -- - -- _091- 249 03/27/--85 100030_ WILLIAM HOFFMAN POLICE SERV 10 -4100- 420 -42 100.00 • --- - - - - -- – — ^^ 091253 03/19/85 32.50 HUMPHREY RADIATOR REPIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 -- —_ 3! 2 -,-L-50 4i 40 *•+ -CKS ^' 091283 03/27/85 19808.10 JONES CHEMICALS INC WATER SUPPLIES 40 -4622- 805 -80 ~ —T— s 1�BOR.10 • 53 *i* -CKS �^ 991289 03/27/85 100.00 WALTER JOHNSON POLICE SERV 10- 4100 - 420 -42 5f. 100.00 . - - - - -- - - -- - - -- ._* .. -CKS - - -- 198 5 C. OF ED INA rurry un n�tr •unuu- CHECK A .TER 04 -01 -85 GE 6 2 ' -- 091292- ...- U3/27/_85. -. -__ _3,562.30_. -_- _HARRIIS- _MOMETER_C.0 - INSURANCE 10- 4260_51.0r_51 " 091292 03/27/85 1,172.10 HARRIS HOMETER CO INSURANCE 10- 4260 - 560 -56 ' R 4,734.10 + 7 f+•f +# * ++-CKS 09____- _U3./191._8.5 _- _- .- __36.69 ___GENUINE PARTS - 6.EN- S_MRIZES 10 -4504- 646 -64 i 36.69 • Q3J._26J8_5 231 .04_ -- KOKESHJIIHLE_T_I.C_ GEN- SUP�IIES 10 4504 -¢� 14 231. ^4 + - . +..�. -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - -. -�- -- - - -f *t- CKS. - . " 09130.4 03/25/85 42.45 KNOX LUMB =R CO LUMBER 10 -4604- 646 -64 ° 0913U4 03J25185 39.95 UMB_R CO LUMBER 10 -4604- 646 -64 - f 82.40 + z, •fffr# zz f+f -CKS Z= 091315 03/19/85 415.80 ANCHDR PAPER PAPER SUPPLIES 10 -4514- 520 -52+ t* f# # #f # # +f -CKS r` U91317 03/19/85 106.92 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 801 -80 091317 03126/85 686.58 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 27- 4620- 662 -66 793_.50 + 13, 37 f•kf #• 33 + ++-CKS ° 091324 03/26185 1,285.83 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 10- 2010 - 000 -00 791324 Q3/2J/85 497.51 LOGIS DEPT BILLING 10 -4228- 160 -16 _093 -3 Z_4_ 03/2U/__85 1_9103.87 LQGLS DEP_T_BIL -MIG 10- 4230 - 1_60_.16 -I 1,91324 03/20185 19868.11 LOGIS DEPT BILLING 10- 4233 - 200 -20 ' 091324 U3 /2Q /85 918.73 LOGIS DEPT BILLING 10- 4233 - 420 -42 "._- 2Y.1.324 0- 3/20/_85 707..32 LOGIS D.EP_.J_BILIINCz 10- 42.33560 -56 091324 03/20/85 1,896.70 LOGIS DEPT BILLING 40 -4232- 800 -80 0.91324 03/2D/85 222.90 LOGIS DEPT BILLING 50- 4233 - 820 -82 42 24 U.3_/2DJ_8.5 222.91 LOGIS. DEPT B1L_I,INC 50- 4233 - 840 -84 __ 43 091324 03/20/85 222.90 LOGIS DEPT BILLING 50 -4233- 860 -86 44 4. 89946.78 47 f++ -CKS - -- - 1331 03J2.S185 6.13.0.0 �AHASS_C.93EORA I_0N CQN"EPAIRS 10- 4248-560 -56 _� °° 091331 03/27/85 300.10 LAHASS CORPORATION CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248- 560 -56 50 091331 03/27/85 298.48 LAHA''SS CORPORATION CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 ,,i 52 53 + #f •+# 34 f1f -CKS � 55 091344 113/20/85 50.00 MED OXYGEN 6 EQUIP EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 449 -44 56 [191344 03/20/85 42.00 MED OXYGEN & EQUIP. EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 449 -44 a7 I s s 9 s <s of 1965 CITY OF EDINA rwrrie run- ner. ■uni1k] CHECK REGISTER 04 -01 -85 PAGE 7 �....�� 091344 `_ 03/20/85 - '---- _ --- -- 36.36 -` MED OXYGEN 6 EQUIP _.`=�-'.+�.. a...ar avry 1ST AID SUPPLIES try �. avVrvl nv�_ -1 rv�• N 10 -4510- 440 -44 r.V.-- q_nCJJAbt- -' -_' ' - - -- - -' - - -_... - - -' - -- -- 128.36 ' G ••+ +• • •.*-CKS ' 091353 03/19/85 29.60 MINNESOTA GLOVE WELDING SUPPLIES 10- 4610 - 560 -56 - - ° 29.60 ** *-CKS 091356 03/25/85_ MINNES ®TA BLUEPRINT BLUE PRINTING 10 -4570 +260 -26 _233.14 233.14 + ---- - - - - -- - - -- • ■.. +. - - - -- + + +- CKS 091359 03/19/85 601.42 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 09135_9_ 091359 03/1918_5 03/19/85 89.35 4.31 MINN TORO INC MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 45 -40- 560 -56 10 -4540- 560 -56 _ ° OY1359 u3/25/85 21.52 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 359 -- 03/25/85_ ._ 76.68 MINN-TORO INC_ REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 091359 03/25/85 20.92 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 091359 03/25/85 23.24 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 10+ 4540 - 560 -56, 2" 091359 091359 03/19/85 03/19185 _ 7.78 31.89 MINN TORO INC MINN TORO INC REPAIR PART.�S REPAIR PARTS 10- 45_40 - 560 -_56' 10- 4540 - 560 -56 2: 091359 03/20/85 IS8.92 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 662 -66 27 _ 19066.23 + 091360 L3/20/85 36.10 MINNESOTA WANNER CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 3 C91_360 U3/20/85 18.50 MINNESOTA WANNER CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 5_60 -5_6 091360 03/25/85 43.50 MINNESOTA WANNER CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 646 -64 091360 63/25/85 43.25 MINNESOTA WANNER CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 646 -64 " 091360 03/25/85 92.].0 MINN_E_SOTA WANNER REPAIR PARTS 10 -4 560 -56_ 091360 03%25/85 19.50 MINNESOTA MANNER REPAIR PARTS -540- 10- 4540 - 560 -56 _ 's 091360 03/25/85 7.50 MINNESOTA WANNER PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 J6 260.35 + - .37 �'^ �o ••.••• 091365 03/27/85 100.00 BERT MERF:LD r POLICE SERV , 10 -4100- 420 -42 _.. --- -- -- **• -CKS ' n7 100.00 • + ** -CKS ^` _- A9.137_Q 03/1 y_ /85__ ,- 579.92,_ M- LOLAND P4_0DUCTS_ C -0_ CONCESSIONS 28 -4624- 704 -70 11 091370 U3/19/P5 44.15 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO CONCESSIONS __ 28 -4624- 704 -70 ^' 091370 03/19/85 73.50- MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO CREDIT 28- 4624- 704 -70 ^" 550.57 4n s, * * * *+* . ** -CKS 3V U91330 03/26/55 99097.55 THOMSEN NYBECK SERVICES 10 -4100- 220 -22 - sa 9,097.55 + S6 + +*-CKS 091335 0 3/5 240.00 MCGUIRE ROBERT TREE TNSFECTION 10- 47L2- i5i - ;O -1 1985 OF EDINi. CHECK STER 091436 03/19/85 210 0.5 RUMPS 8 METER SERV REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 • — -- -- 04.01 -8, AGE 8 • i HEC.ILfiD•- OASE AMDUIILL._ VENDD3. ITEM QESCRIPTION cniiuT + ++ —CKS a - NO�NY�_C��Qi�1 ME.SSJIGE__— _ .. z 3 791385 5 03/27,/65 U3L2ZL85 720. ^0 MCGUIRD ROBERT TREE TRIMMING 60 -1300- 012 -18 4 _- 099.1L33.88.5 03/27/85 ____— __MCGULBE— ROBERT I rrrrrr P . 960.00 * MCGUIRE ROBERT TREE TRIMMING 60 -1300- 012 -18 {'! !ir —CKS i a3 9'14.5.2 C311 -9/85 1t5l0 CK_SERV BALLERY REp_Aj R_PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 f ,- 03/19/85 03/19/85 36.60 ii +ir! PARTS _ 10.4540- 560 -56 OQ— /25.L8.5 26.32 — .22.80_ QUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR _`OUT aALIE K.-.SERV R1 REp_AI PARTS PARTS ° -t r+i -CKS I,: _- 0-913.88 091 388 -- 03/25L85 U3/25/85 10.50 _ 13.45 NTL_AIOMIK_MOTOR REPASR_eAf37S 10 -4540- 560 -56 • QY1388 03/25/85 20.25 NTL ATOMIK MOTOR NTL ATOMIK MOTOR REPAIR PARTS ____ 10- 4540 - 560 -56 _ h,I ,2 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 • 49•_2 *r +rrr t1 - - -- - -- -— r i i -CKS V n�091413 03/25/85 336.60 336.60 + NATIONWIDE PAPERS PAPER SUPPLIES - �-,, ,-• rrrrrr -- iii- CKS "+ 113/27/_85 -_ 119.70_— Mc0 rrNTE�EALiN H9Sp FLIAS 10 -4156- 510 -51 119.70 i - - - - - -- - `a rfiri! I "r 091421 03/19/85 121.52 OLSON CHAIN & CABLE GEN SUPPLIES 40- 4504- 801 -80 • -- _— DLSDN- iXHAIN__ &- -CABLE T0.0-LS 4D- 4580 - 801-80 217.23 091457 E�ll -- 6^I rrrrra — 091 461 " 0'01 461 a� U3/20485 75.81 R.L.60ULD & CO.INC. REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 662 -66 r r rr -CKS , U3/2G/85 89.95 REED SALES & SERVICE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 U3/2U/85 65.96 REED SALES & SERVICE PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 Art 091436 03/19/85 210 0.5 RUMPS 8 METER SERV REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 • — -- -- _210. D_5 + • i '�I rrrrrr + ++ —CKS 1) 3 091450 03/19/85 114.30 PBE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 �,( 114.30 + I rrrrrr -- - a !ir —CKS i a3 9'14.5.2 C311 -9/85 1t5l0 CK_SERV BALLERY REp_Aj R_PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 f 091452 091452 03/19/85 03/19/85 36.60 QUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR PARTS _ 10.4540- 560 -56 OQ— /25.L8.5 26.32 — .22.80_ QUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR _`OUT aALIE K.-.SERV R1 REp_AI PARTS PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 -t 200.74 i 1 "'0 !.0 lag_ rrrrrr h,I 091457 E�ll -- 6^I rrrrra — 091 461 " 0'01 461 a� U3/20485 75.81 R.L.60ULD & CO.INC. REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 662 -66 r r rr -CKS , U3/2G/85 89.95 REED SALES & SERVICE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 U3/2U/85 65.96 REED SALES & SERVICE PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 Art 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHEQ"O*QAjE AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER 04-01-85 PAGE 9 155.91 • C91462 03/27f85 300 . 0 RENTAL EOJIP 9 SALES TOOLS 10-4580-353-30 091 462 03/19/85 49*55 RENTAL EQUIP & SALES TOOLS 10-4580-353-30 091462 03/27185 310.170 RENTAL—Mlj;!-&�-SALES TOOLS 10-4580-353-30 091462 03/27/85 300.1--0 RENTAL EQUIP & SALES TOOLS 10-4580-353-30 959.55 • 091465 03/25/85 30.75 - --- RICIHFIEILD PLUMB & CO REPAIRS 30.75 -C-ONT 091 469 03/25/85 316*38 ROAD MACHINERY REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 31608 091470 03/27f175 25,00 OR ROCKWELL MEDICAL SERV 10-4100-481-48 .00 091486 63/19•185 380.il0 DON STR,EICHER GUNS GEN —SUPPLIES 10-4504-560-56 3,80.010 • zn 091491 03/26/85 66900 STRAUGH R9WARE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 390 -30 31 66.00 .09149203/23/85 250.54 S-0-U.TWD.AL.F-- FORD —CPN.T-RE-RA.IRS 10- 4248- 560 -56 r!Yl 492 03/25/85 29.57 SOUTMDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 091 492 03/19/85 37.97 SOUTHDA'LE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 318.D8 991 502 03/19/85 618.60- SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CORRECTION 10-4540-560-56 U91502 U3/19/85 18.60 SUBUIBA'N CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 091502 03/20185 11.09 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 091502 03/19/85 616.60 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 y 03/19f85 51.02 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 —0-9-- 2 0A/19 /85 -.--1 - Tk-- SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 17 82.47 1 **—C n. 091505 03/26/85 100.99 SUN ADVERTISING 10-4210-140-14 10f).99 '3 ftf +ii 54 ***-C 5 � 091 508 03/25/85 5*07 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-420-42 nS 091508 03/25/85 6.18 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-420-42 -] 1985 OF EDINA CHECK .STER 04 -01 -8: ;AGE 10 1 ._._��.��_..,.�__ z,.�.,- -„��_- .- 4iu�x.i i�n_.UGJt,nir�iury nccuurv� rvV. 1.IYY. a r�V•_1�[7.ESSAGE __ ' 091508 03/20/95 37.50 ST PAUL BOOK OFFICE•SUFPLIES 10- 4516 - 160 -16 ° 0.91508__- t73/2l}185 _- _. 181.08 .ST_.PAUL_BOOK - -_ OFFICE SUPPLIES 091508 03/20/85 37.50- ST PAUL BJOK CREDIT 10- 4516 - 510 -51 ' C91 5116 03/20/85 24.30- ST PAUL BOOK CREDIT 10- 4516 - 510 -51 J QYL5_08 03/20-/85 __5.94_ ST PAUL -BOJK GEN SUPPLIES 23 -4504- 611 -61 ' 091508 03/25/85 13.23 ST PAUL BOOK REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 807 -80 187.20 * **-CKS 0.9.1.512 L_3119Lg5_ .66.12- S__T_R0aB - 6EN._SUPPLIES 10- 4504- -30 091512 03/19/85 17.49 S T ROBB GEN SUPPLIES _30 -1 10 -4504- 646 -64 " 091512 03/25/85 14.26 S T ROBB REPAIR PARTS 10 -4504- 646 -64 _ - __fIY1512_ — 03/19/85 ___ t 67.44 -- __S_T__.R.OBB_ REPAIR. 10- 4540 -5_60 091512 03/25/85 19.74 S T ROBB REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 " 091512 03/25/85 5.26 S T ROBB REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 801 -80 2.9-00 31! fff * +* * ** -CKS 091516 03/19/85 139.29 SEARS ROEBUCK TOOLS 10 -4580- 301 -30 ' 091516 03/2J/85 79.96 SEARS ROEBUCK GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504- 708 -70.' 222.2 5 + • ** -CKS =, 091522 03/20/85 — 100070 STANDARD OIL — GASOLINE 10- 4612- 560 -56 JC 100.00 ,] **+ -CKS '' 0_1_530— _0.3/_1_9/.8.5_ TExGA$_CORP —GEN - 101 -0 �' 3:I fff ft • — - _* **-CKS___ _ 091545 03/25/85 106.00 TWIN CTY GARAGE DOOR REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 446 -44 31 -Y -1545. .,_3Lt9L85 _99.40- TWIN TY C GARAGE DOOR REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 41 205.40 * - -- - - - — !tit- C K "" 091564 L'3/25/85 119.80 •11AUGHN'S",• GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 510 -51 41 1-19 ,c * ++ -CKS I °° 491569 03/25/85 660.96 VALLEY IND PROPANE GASOLINE 28- 4612- 707 -70 `Q 660.96 + • ** -CKS _ 091575 03/25/85 98,.74 uATER PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 803 -80 3f 98.74 • 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 4 Pt%LNT ar CHECK REGISTER 04-01-85 PAGE 11 ___491578 3.90 'LER WM o H. Z I Efj _CO INC ARTS 10- 4540 - 56- 091 57K 03/25/85 242.54 WM.H.ZTEGLER CO INC REPAIR PARTS .560- -_____ 1,3-4540-560-56 0.91578 03/25/85 33.55 WM.H*ZZIEGL7-R CO INC REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 091578 03/25/85 26.65 _399.71 WM.".ZIEGLER CO INC - REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 7 091518 03/25f85 WM*H. ZIEGL-E-R-CO-INC- REPAIR -- PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 . 1 091578 03/25/85 11.16 WM*lH*ZIErjLER co INC REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 491578 03/25185 It 0. 8 M e-H . Z I E G L E R - C- O_ _INC_. REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 091 578 U3/25/85 89.36 WM*il.ZIEGLER CO INC REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 C91576 ()3/25/85 37.99 WM.H.ZIEGLE:R CO INC REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 1191511 U3_/25/85 26*35 WM.H.ZTEGLER CO INC REPA R PARTS .10-4540-560-56 091579 03/19f85 31.63 --- - WILLLA 15 STE EL-HDWE ISE N SUPPLIES 10-4504-301-3C 1391519 03/19/85 196.04 -E-_ WILLIAMS STEEL-HOWE __ TOOLS 10-4580-301-30 227.67 ***-CKS _108.33 108.33 4EjL __ � SUE MILEAGE - 10-4208-600-60 ***-CKS 091 590. 03/27/85 100.00 HENRY VROBLESKI POLICE SERV 10-4100-420-42 10000 2p ***-CKS 31 091616 03/27/85 285.26 MILLIPORE C'0RP GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-482-48 37 285.26 • ***-CKS 09.1619 03/20/85 _79*16 EGEBERG CYCLr' C-OR RE-C-TJ C N 27-4540-662-66 137 091619 03120-f 85 79.16 EGEBERG' CYCLE REPAIR PARTS 1, 091619 Q3/20/85 79.16- EGEBERG CYCLE REPAIR .PARTS 27-4540-662-66 V, 1-9-0-OL _5_8.13 •**-CKS 091 7().2 03/19/85 FOLEY-BELSAU CO GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-646-64 58.13 091 703 03/19f85 18.99 MN FIRE & SAFETY INC GEN SUPPLIES 40 -4504- 801 -80 18.99 * U917Q4 03/19f85 12*02 "ACH CHEMICAL CO REPAIR PARTS 40-4546-803-80 12.32 * 52 091705 03/19785 138.09 CONNEY SAFETY PROD SAFETY EQUIP 10-4642-301-30 53 5.! 138.09 * 51 0917Q6 03/19/85 2*80 FEED RITE CONTROLS REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540-803-80 2.Ao * ,l 1985 OF EDINA CHECK iSTER 04 -01 -8. -AGE 12 ` HECK ND. DATE AMOUNT YENDD3 -_ ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0, -LdYiq P._0..- N�(ESSAG� ' - _USi1_Z07_ ❑3/1.41!85__- .- _ -___- 4.38___ SIAL._NJINUE_&_OLSI REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 5.6.0 4.88 • .6 -- - 091 7118 03./19!85 ' __47._.43 u�ST WSLD WELDI NG SUPPLIES - 10- 4610- 56Q-56 u 47.43 * -_UY1 7_x19 -- ;13/19/85 -- _..149.83 - -. -_ WILENSKY GEN - SUPP. -:TES 10- 4504 - 318 -30 UYI709 03/19/85 856.00 WILENSKY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 318 -30 I" 091709 33/19/85 1,34100 WILENSKY PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 _._ - _2_.346.9.3 • U9171(' 03/19/85 137.93 GARLANDS INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 646 -64 „�- -- - -------------- - - - -.] 37.93 OY1711 03/19185 307.20 ZIP PENN INC GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 353 -30 �� - -- - 307.20 + OY1712 J3/19/85 39280.00 CYLINDER CITY INC CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 " -- __0_Y_1.7_1�- __03925/_85 -.____ __ 225.00 C]f1LND.ZR_CLTT_I_NC PARTS 10- 4629 - 560-56 56 22 39505.00 * - ----- - --- -- - - - 2. 3 L197 .5 45.00 AUTO PARTS CITY REPAIR PARTS 10 -454Q -560 6 29 45.00 + Z' .3_119/_5 __- 125.96 -_ -S.MALL�NG_LNE�IIT EAUIP lnPER 10- 4808 - 3.35 0_ 125.96 • - -- - -- '0 091715 111119195 17..24 ABACI INC OFFTCE SUPPLIES 10- 4516- 490 -49 I71 3 17.24 + - _ 3J_ -�y�1 i6 03- /_1_9/85 20..00..__._ sTB.01y.1£LLS- Tis_lLClCI11.G GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 20.00 91717 G3/L9L85 350_.510 J_QRD4.N SAW MILL GE 10 -4504- 746 -74 31 350.00 • - - -- - -- - - -- 0191_7 78 _03979/_9.5 _- _34. -4.5- PERKIES GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 -646!4 - - - - -- 40 34.45 • - - - -- .' 41 ` 42 312U./ -8.5 750_•0.0 MN 00WNHOLE s_EgyICES EQUIP NAM 27- 4274 - 670 -66 43 750.00 + - -- 4 n9tZ2.O -D3./2U./._85 -- ._60..91__ ACME _V3_SIBL_E RE.COJU OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516- 51Q•51 60.91 + 4] "0 /2U /85 7Q_.45 DON ENGER UNIFORM REIM 10- 4266 -422-42 " 79.45 • - 31___QYL72.Z - U3-120_/-8.5._ 139.6) SHRELFFS DEFT ROOM &_BOARD 10- 4286- 220 -22 -- 52 � r3 139.60 • - - - - - -- _ -.. -- - ' 2L723 U.U-210L8.5 85_0_00 DATA LINE CORP SCHOOL 10- 4202 - 421 -42 7 85.00 - 3L 9]- 724.- __.-D3/20/_8 -5 _ 59.93._- P.LCKYILK__QLSCOUNT S. T_ REE_T�1.RFC>ORIES - ------------ --`_�� _- - - -- - - -- - - - ~ ~ 1985 czn or cnrwx -] c*ccx mn. owrc umuumr _ _ - _ _ ~ _ ~ � � � � � � � ~ ~ � � cwcrn xcmznrcn 04-01~85 pxsc vs ^-~~~^ ---- -------- ---- `- —` - `- 4 091 125 03/20/85 115.93 ROGEA LAURENCE PHOTO SUPPLIES 10-4508-420-42 U91726 U3/2Uf85 250.00 ORLY R GRAMS AMBULANCE REFUND 10-3180-000-00 091728 03/20185 i4 - 4 5— SOFTiA CFIRST CAPITAL OUTLAY 10-4900-600-60 091 729 0.3/20/85 250.OD 808 SOBCOVIAK CLEANING SERY 23::4 200- 616- 61 C9173U 03/20/85 391018 JOHN PIKE WATER INVENTORY SUPPLIES 23-1209-000-00 C91 131 03/20f85 198.4U BARR ENGIIEERING SERVIC ES 10-4220-260-26 21 091 732 03/20/85 26*00 rAAO DUES 10-4 204- 20 0- 20 2n 091 133 03/20/85 14.3D REAL ESTATE JOURNAL DUES 10-4204 2n 14.00 31 091734 03/2U/85 3600 GREATER MMLS AREA DUES 10-4204-200- 20 32 36.00 091736 03120185 8*45 NAOMI JOHNSON SUPPLIES 23-3445-000-00 37 091736 U3/20/85 35.39 NAOMI JOHNSON OFFICE SUPPLIES 23-4 5 04-611- 61 11 43.54 Ic 091737 03/2U/85 19.00 STEVEN B NOSEK CLASS REFUND 23-3500-000-00 091738 03/20/85 21.00 VICKI SANFORD CLASS REFUKD 23-3500-000-00 Is 091 739 C13/20/85 43*55 MARILVN MUELLER DATA PROCESSING 10-4200-TC�6--56 49 U91740 03/25/85 6e0O BMSIOFFICE STORE GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-420-42 51 091741 J3/2U/85 61.97 BROWNING RANGE SUPPLIES 10 OY1742 U3/2U/85 31934.30 PLOALM BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION 27-1332-000-00 56 3034.00 * 1985 OF EDINA C ELY-Me DATE ASP OUJyT CHECK STER 04 -01 -8�, .AGE 14 i IPn UGJGKif'TlUN ACCOUNT N0. INV. #_M.E.S_S.AGy ' _._- 1191_Z.43_ —_- 13/201.85_ -- .___107.50_._ HENNEP_LN_CDUNLY RUB.HLSH REMOVAL 10_4250-353 p s 107.50 + - — - - - -- 6 ^ _-7-4-4 03_1_2U_L85 249.00 249.00 + nNroxc.O 14r 6FN SUPPLtcc 10 -4504 470 -47 0 O 29.68 - __— BARBER_TRANS___ CORRECTION 27 -4- 292 - 642 -66 " 091745 03/25/85 29.68- BARBER TR4NS FREIGHT 27- 4292 - 662 -66 iz 0.91/45 03/25/85 29.68 BARBER TR %NS FREIGHT 27- 4292 - 662 -66 -_ 29.6.$ + " .. 091746 J3/25/85 32.06 LOUIE ABRAHAM MILEAGE 40- 4208 - 804 -80 -� - - - -- - - - - - -- - - -- 32..06 - 7 in 091747 03/25/85 40.00 BETH KRINKE OFFICE HELP 10- 4105 - 600 -60 - -- -- 40.00 + =' 21 191748 03/25/85 40.37 DUFFY PAPER CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 620 -62 - -- - - -- - — - -- 60.3 7 _ 'Z- I21 091/49 U3/25/85 183.54 PHYSIO CONTROL 1ST AID SUPPLIES 10 -4510- 440 -44; 183.4 * y ?` 09175U 03 /2518 12.00 INTERNATIONAL ASSOC CONFERENCE 10 -4202- 422 -42 2� -- -- -- - 12.00- • 091751 03/25/85 125.00 PTAC SCHOOL 10- 4202 - 421 -42 1.25.00 • �-' 091752 03/25/85 44.35 M P H INDUSTRIES EQUIP MAIAT 10- 4274 - 421 -42 -- - - - - - _44..35 + 091/53 U3/25/85 39049.24 HENNEPDN CTY TREAS ROOM & BOARD 10 -4286- 220 -22 - - - - -- — 3..049_._2_4 • 3, '0I 091754 03/25/85 1,640.00 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 � - Q'I 091755 03/25/85 340.00 J & G POKER LUBRICANTS 10 -4618- 560 -56 ` 3_40.70 + I d U91756 03/25/85 67.46 STREMEL MOW COMP TOOLS I 40- 4580- 801 -80 - -- - - -- - - - -- -- _- 6 7.4 b °'I e 091757 03/25/85 795.00 FURNITURE GALLERY EQUIP MAINT 27 -4274- 661 -66 79s_0o • � 4^ ° ' 091758 03/25/85 40.00 NN CHAPTER IAAI DUES 10 -4204- 440 -44 - - -- — - - - -- — 40.0.0 -_* — - - - - - -- --- -- ` - 62 ' CY1159 03/25/85 793.50 M R SIGN CO INC SIGNS 10- 4542- 325 -30 S< 93..50 • I L091764 03/25/85 142.21 !XEROX CDRPI EQUIP RENTAL '' 10 -4226- 510 -51 1968 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE ` 3 04 -01 -85 PAGE 15 - -- -.' -- ------- _' - -_.- - -- -' 4 09176'1 03/25/85 _ 5 091761 03/25/85 ACCOUNT N0. INV- # P.O. a MESSAGE 091761 U3/25/85 _ e 091762 _03/25/85_ - -- 091768 03/25/85 ` 091763 U3/25/85 04 -01 -85 PAGE 15 13 091769 - -- 03/25/85 V.NDOR 091764 03/25/85 ACCOUNT N0. INV- # P.O. a MESSAGE ° 091770 03/25/85 21_ 091.765 -_- 03_/2_5 -/85_- ^ CY1766 03/25/85 091771 03/26/85 3� 32. 091772 03/26/85 3..I- - -- - - -- 3, 39 091773 03/26/85 � 35 137 091174 ,. II4�1 091 715 L' U3/26/85 03/26/85 091776 - U3/26/85 091777 U3/26/85 nnl 091778 03/26/85 s, 5J 091779 03/26/85 54 I's 091760 03/26/85 CHECK REGISTER 04 -01 -85 PAGE 15 AMOUNT V.NDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV- # P.O. a MESSAGE 142.21 7D.OD- NORTUEZ`HYDRAULICS CREDIT 10- 4620 - 560 -56 109.60 NORTHERN•HYDRAULICS PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 4486.50 - MOORS BUSINESS SYST CAPITAL OUTLAY _ 10- 4900 - 600 -60 4,54609 72.64_ ADVAN. CE - _B'ARING,SERy PARTS" 104620- 560 -56- 55.47 AMERICAN TRAILER SERVICE - PARTS _-- -- 10 -4620- 560 -56 128.11 84.44 MECO PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 - 84.44 + - - -- -- 43.50 MIL' AUKEE ELECTRIC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 390 -30 250.93 AR ISTI' FLOORS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 _76.81 -ifii .2 k- GUY " - SPEAKER-, -- • GEN SUPPLIES _ 40- 4504 - 811 -80 -- -- -- -_____ 12.98 - PROD POWERPROD _ POWER- REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 ` 12.98 . - - - - - -- - -- - - -- - - -- _404.33 POWER SYSTEM PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56•' 404.33 • - - - - - -- 174.00 KEY CADI'LLAC CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 174.00 25.00 1I.A.A.I MEMBERSHIP 10 -4204- 440 -44 - -- 25_.00_ + 212.76 HILB INVEN SUPPLIES 23- 1209 - 000 -00 212.76 30.00 STATE TREASURE WATER CERT EXAM 40- 4310 - 809 -80 30.00 • 200.00 N CENTRAL SECTION SCHOOL 40- 4202 - 809 -80 200.00 • 200.00 N CENTRIAL SECTION SCHOOL 40- 4202 - 809 -80 -_2 0 () --.v __- 153.00 MUNICIPAL MEETING EXPENSE 10- 4206 - 500 -50 153.00 + 165.00 EDINA EMPLOYEES CLUB SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 500 -50 165.00 * 135.00 MARJORIE MADSEN OFFICE FURNITURE 23- 1330 - 000 -00 135.00 80000 MARGARET GUST INST FEE 23- 4100 - 614 -61 , v d.. d v w v b ti L 1965 OF EDINA CHECK STER 04 -01 -8 AGE 16 ❑ATE AMDUNT VEND 02 TTEM DFSCRTPTTf1N A 0TNT . ... ............................ I......._.... ... ......__..__... ....... .. _._ __..._.__......._.............. _..,... ... ...._._.- - - - - ND TNV b PLp..__p_HES.S.AGE 2 3 80.00 4 091781 03/26/85 216.00 'PAM BON2ELET WAGES 23- 4260- 610 -61 ' a 216.00 • ' 091782 03/26/85 108. ^0 KATWY GUSTAFSON INSTRUCTOR FEE 23- 4100 - 614 -61 ° 9 108. ^0 + 1c Q91 783 03/26/85 108.00 - MAUREEN BROCKWAY INSTRUCTOR FEE 23-41 CO-61 4-61 " 108.00 + " 091784 03/26/85 59000.00 THE PIRKL ASSOC CONSTRUCTION 27- 1300 - 000 -00 " 5.000.00 f.i -CKS ° 17R6 �13J_27L85 -,- 356.00- NPTR) TRUCK B_flDY REP CONT REPATRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 F 20 356.00 + -- 2' _.0S�1Z8a- _.__- 03!_27J�5_. 9624.00._._ US PO_SIMASTER MAILING._. 10- 48- U- n- 00-6.0 1 9624.00 + 2` 8 0 12Z/RS 101_.__70 sTFWART W BNr_ GFN S- UPPLTF,3 10- 4504 - 560 -6' I 101.70 + 2' X1.3/_27/_85 __ -_ - .- --- 675.00 -_- _MW -S-T U_RP R.: .MO VAL E.LM RE.MILVAL- 10- 42QQ- X5.3 -30 :9 '0 yj 19r 03/27/8.5 15900 STATF TR RuRrg PERMIT FEE 60 -1300- 262 -04 " 15.00 " -191_7.9- 1__- 03L271.85 __361._95- G M E [ONSULIANJS TESTING 60-1300-0 1-16 361.95 + '` CY_LZ22 D31ZJ_8.5 1_978L.92_ NISSEN CAPITL 'OUTLAY 10- 4900 - 600 -60 - - - -- - -- ,� 3c 19787.92 + 19 _ +i+ +i i _ 779268.72 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND Computer Checks Vs 99600.70 FUND 20 TOTAL 62569 thru 62750 A2 19654.42 FUN.Q_Z3_T0T -AL A.RT C-UT ER i '° 119643.45 FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 29826.95 FUND 2g TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND "' _______150.5.1 F._UND_2.2_ TOTAL _GUN _RAN .GE_EU1VD_... -.-_ 69796.90 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND A('F„�; "� f-'"i: I=AYISENT, 19103.11 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND ae <q 9.033. -54 FIIN�AO TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 30 31 1139277.65 TOTAL - F ,:, ^•_ -_ -_ . , // -" - - --_", 53 36 fINANC= DIFLCI6R L %l E ! . ... ............................ I......._.... ... ......__..__... ....... .. _._ __..._.__......._.............. _..,... ... ...._._.- - - - - 19F5 CI . OF EOINA CHECK RE,-,TER 02 -28 -85 , ..GE 1 _ CHr_CK NO. DATE--- AMOUNT VEND01 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. 9 MESSAGE 036135 U2/25/85 1079- EAGLE WINE - DISCOUNT 50- 3710- 003 -00 MANUAL 036135 -- - - 02/25/85 -- 89.67 EAGLE WINE INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL_ -I. U3/12/85 E7. 98 ■ EAGLE WIN: 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 4 043135 _ 03/12/85 •• ■• *• EAGLE MINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 143135 !;312 %a5 29.52- * ** -CKS 50 -3 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 043135 :13/12/85 547.3.0 EAGLE WIN' 5n -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL Oft °�'c e� C36190 62/25/ ?5 139 *;30 GRIGGS CO3KR 50- 4628 - 842 -84 INVENTORY 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 1,426.20 EAGLE WINE 138.30 + _ MANUAL 2,859.84 -' it rrr•►• „ _ ++ *•CKS 0364333 62%25/85 43992 A 5)- 3700 - 822 -82 INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822 -82 MANUAL ^ 036433 !2/25/85 65.38 PASU5!S 8 SONS 043138 INVENTORY 50- 4632- 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -3700- 842 -84 MANUAL 109.90 ■ 43/12/85 23.56- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3700 - 862 -86 „ MANUAL I :3/12/85 03/12/85 14.10- 17. ?D- ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 822 -82 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL MANUAL 6 043138 ••• -CKS . ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL a. 043138%1 85 .44- ED PHILLIPS 03643 ' X2785 ? 5 17.53 PRIOR WINE 17.65- INVENTORY 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL - -------- - --- -- _23.30- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 go 043138 043138 63%12%85 33/12/85 :f: :�. - . ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710 - 842 -84 _MANUAL. —_ MANUAL MANUAL ,o 743136 03/12/85 73 *38- •. :•• CKS <� 043367 23/12/85 -/127 6.75 CePIT8L CITY DISTRI ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL -i. 7J43U67- S3 4� CAPITA?. CITY DISTRI MANUAL ;,I 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL- 04 3067 03/12/85 776.32 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL -: U43�67 ':3/12185 11.25 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL I' i i 6 0 ' 0 ,o „ 12 3 lwm «I . �I •.•••• - ■■ ■_CKS 4 -_9 043135 U3/12/85 10.95- EAGLE WIN: 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 4 043135 _ 03/12/85 IS.89- EAGLE MINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 143135 !;312 %a5 29.52- EAGLE WIN: 50 -3 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 043135 :13/12/85 547.3.0 EAGLE WIN' 5n -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL Oft L 043135 33/12/85 944.70 EAGLE WIN_ 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL .) 0431T5---- 037TT185 1,426.20 EAGLE WINE -50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 2,859.84 „ • ** -CKS " 043138 ` 93/12/85 38.70- ED PHILLI °S 5)- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 04313T-�_3-%i2T8_5 .. - .D PHILLIPS 50- 370;0- 842 -84 MANUAL " 043138 Q3/12/85 39.56- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3700- 842 -84 MANUAL 043138 - 43/12/85 23.56- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3700 - 862 -86 „ MANUAL J43136 043139 :3/12/85 03/12/85 14.10- 17. ?D- ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 822 -82 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL MANUAL 6 043138 U3/12/85 1.70- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL a. 043138%1 85 .44- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL. 043138 73/12/85 17.65- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 043138 03/12/85 _23.30- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 go 043138 043138 63%12%85 33/12/85 44.51- 22.62- ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710 - 842 -84 _MANUAL. —_ MANUAL MANUAL ,o 743136 03/12/85 73 *38- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 043138 G3 /112/85 9.96- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL " 043136 03/12/85 19.18- EO PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL ;,I 19P5 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -28 -85 PAGE V CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT V_NDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. 9 P.O. 9 M = E SSAG 4 3-1 7-L;- 7, 371 77S - ll_ (21 - U43139 03/12/85 9.16 ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL = 043138 63/12/85 9.?6- ED PMTLLI =S 50- 3710 - 862-86 MANUAL GRIGGS COOPER _ C4313S - - " -" 3/12785 - -- �- 337:6 ED PHALLI =S 50- 4626- 822 -82 HANUAL ' ., 043138 J3/1 2/A5 .71 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL ; a� 74313? U3/12/85 19164.93 ED PHILLIPS 57- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL j 04313'?--- 7371 -M, 5 .�Q li ffb�Q TL LI ° -t6 6-842-84 MANUAL -�'' 043138 63/12/85 39669.18 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL ^43138 U3/12/85 .0r) ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 043135__- __ -_ -- 737127$5 $5- .�?�J- ED PHALLI?S 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL _12 043136 J3/12/85 704.•5 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4528- 822 -82 MANUAL ;;I 043139 03/12/85 2.225.65 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL TNTERCONTINENTAL P - 0431 3d- -`- U3/12�8-5 ..•. ED PH:-LLI S 50 =4628- 42 -84 MANUAL ;•J 04313? u3/12IS5 19131.ot ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 M .� 0431388 C3 /12 /A'_ 8?2.50 ED PHIL•LIP'S 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL �zn n - 743135-' - -- 1.3/12785- --- 122 :_?1 t- D PHILLIPS 557- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 21 *� J43138 03/12/85 452.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 43171 33/12/'!5 4 043131' -` 03/12/95 452.00 E0 P H I L L I ? S 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL z. -' 7431 38 - -7371 2785 95". 3 ED 'i- HILLIP' 50-4629--862-86 MANUAL " I21 043138 L3/12/85 452.80- ED PHALLI °S 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL PK 5 50- 4628- 822 -82 M - 119896.29 # a. -i_ -_r 0 L i 4w I . ap ep U r 0 4w 0 0 U rl -I!n w= • •- 0 '1 �43Z7T -737 2 f 7 5 5.10 1 U _ I E N T AL PK - 8 -84 -84 MANUAL 43171 03/12/95 653.22 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL I, -- 5 ,,096.31 • -_,� 6 r. C K S 71 43265 9.15- JOHNSON NINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 43295 03/12/85 12.74- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL '_, I?�l 4 3-1 7-L;- 7, 371 77S - - I IG GS COJPER A. 3 C C 0 0- - -8 M MANUAL 4319u 03/12/85 5 57.25- G GRIGGS CO) °ER AND C C 5 50- 3710 - 842 -84 M MANUAL 1 4319q 63/12/85 4 47.72- G GRIGGS COOPER _ C 5 50- 3710 - 862 -86 M MANUAL 1� G31D -- `- 03/1217?_5_.— - -1531 �GRi6GS C _AND C C 5 50- 4626 - 822 -82 M MANUAL - 43190 63/12/85 2 29862.31 G GRIGGS CO)PER AND C C 5 50- 4626- 842 -84 M MANUAL a 43196 U3/12/85 2 2.301.96 G GRIGGS COOPER AND C C 5 50- 4626 - 862 -86 M MANUAL j a;J 4319,i u ! 25/35 1 134.jU G GRIGGS C I INVENTORY 5 50-4626-862-86 M MANUAL 1 1 69693.51 • e e=l • *• -CKS 432/1 C3112185 1 10. ?1- I INTERCONTINENTAL P PK 5 50- 3710- 822 -82 M MANUAL a an 43271' - -'- u`37TZ78 . .i - T TT- WE "TC-ITR M MANUAL 43271 03 /12 1 A5 1 13.06- I INTERCONTINENTAL P PK . .50- 3710 - 842 -84 M MANUAL 43171 03/12/85 3 36.21- T TNTERCONTINENTAL P PK 5 50 -3710- 842 -84 M MANUAL , ,z 43271 - -`- 13/12!$ A A�3- I I%JTE-U OYTIN =VIAL P PK 5 50- 3710 - 862 -86 M MANUAL " "I 43[71 '3/12/85 1 1.35 I INTERCONTINENTAL P PK 5 50- 4626- 822 -82 M MANUAL 43271 03/12/85 5 510.63 I INTERCONTINENTAL F FK 5 50- 4626- 822 -82 M MANUAL � �n 43 Z 71-' --- L-371-2 T 8 5 5 5*1u - - TTY LMME K K 5 50-4626-842-84 M MANUAL 43211 U3/12185 1 1810.93 T T14TEACONTINENTAL P PK 5 50- 4626- 842 -84 M MANUAL 43171 33/12/'!5 4 4.50 I INTERCONTINENTAL P PK 5 50- 4626- 862 -86 M MANUAL _ 43271 u3 1 1,446.74 I INTE2C5Nffli N T A L P PK 5 57- 4626- 862 -86 M MANUAL ° _ 432/1 03/121A5 7 7.20 I INTERCONTINENTAL P PK 5 50- 4628- 822 -82 M MANUAL 43211 03/12/85 7 751.68 I INTERCONTINENTAL P PK 5 50- 4628- 822 -82 M MANUAL A R.l ' 19?5 CI F EDINA ••• -CKS CHECK RL FR „ie 02 -28 -85 E 3 50- 3710- 822 -82 ` 5 u3/17/85 6- CKS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 - - X3/127 -5 4.50 ?AU3TIS rV SJ- 4628 - 842 -84 CHECK NC. `- DATE dmOUNT VENDO°. ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. N P.O. A MESSAGE MANUAL PR ?OR YIN_ CO 3/12/85 1.70 PAUSTIS 8 SONS 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL - _ �3/fv/_85 -l-U2 96 043265 i-j3/12/85 15.27- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL , y 0432.3 5 03/12/85 29.49- JOHNSON WINE 5003710- 842 -84 MANUAL_- - + +• -CKS 04321-5 !3%12%85 11. ()0- JJ4NSON WINE 51- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL ' - u43265 3/121P5 12.22- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL ; • QUALITY WINE 043265 i!3/12/R5 ^Ti 457.65 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL a 62.56- U432 5- 371-2-793 9.70 JOMMSUN WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL MANUAL n; -'•� G432o5 43/12/85 637.03 J04NS0N WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL • 0432.95 - 03/12/-95 - -- - 7050 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL . 0432:55 J3 %12 %95 763. °2 JOHNSON W'NE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL j 3 rr i 043235 - 3/12/45 6.30 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -64 MANUAL „ v ' C43265 ^3/12/85 24.30 J;IHN30N WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL a - 0432P5 2/8, , b.?5 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL ' r 943285 03/12/85 611.34 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL ,p• 6432+ 5 X3/12/85 -: - - - 10.80 -- - - -- JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL.__ 20 ';43205 3%12%85 6.901 JOHNSON WINE 5^ -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL - 7432 ?5 :3/12/P`. 595.17 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 49513.89 f „I 043433 X4343 3 043433 X4343 3 f f f f r M 74 3 41 X434? C4343 04343 X43 43 ^4343 ^4343 04343 s .. • • r r r ^4345 04345 ?4345 u "4345 .4345 i 04345 X4345 •. I Q4345 04345 04345 • ' ••• -CKS ••+- „ie PRIOR WIN_ CO 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 5 u3/17/85 6- CKS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 - - X3/127 -5 4.50 ?AU3TIS 8 S7 ^�S SJ- 4628 - 842 -84 - MANUAL-- - 5 '.x3/12/8' - - - C3/12/85 2-95.60 PoUSTT_S B SONS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL PR ?OR YIN_ CO 3/12/85 1.70 PAUSTIS 8 SONS 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL - _ �3/fv/_85 -l-U2 96 PAUSTIS 8 SONS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 0 4.90 PRTOR WIN_ CO 394.76 • MANUAL 418.00 • ,� r + +• -CKS 1 ;3/12/95 ' ••• -CKS S X3/12/85 .63- PRIOR WIN_ CO 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 5 u3/17/85 6- PRIOR WIN= CO 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 5 U3/12/85 4.55- PRIOR WIN= CO 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 5 '.x3/12/8' - - - 2.10- PRIOR 41IN_ CO 50- 3710 - 86_2 -86 MANUAL 5 ,,3/72%-95 31.40 PR ?OR YIN_ CO 50- 4628 - 822 -82 -� MANUAL 5 4.3/12/85 227.44 PRIOR WIN_ CO 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 5 13/12/P5 62 .,RD PRIOR WINE CO 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL _ 5 X3212/85 0 4.90 PRTOR WIN_ CO 150- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 418.00 • r + +• -CKS 1 ;3/12/95 21.57- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL_ 1 u3 %12%T 9.50-QUALITV WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 1 13/12/85 15.26- QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 1 03/12/85 - -- -- -, - - -- 25.04- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 1 X3/12185- 1 '3/1285 15.74- 10.34- QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 1 ]3/12/85 62.56- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1 u3/12185 7..1- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL n; 1 03/12/ ?5 1 u3/12/95 19062- 763 35 QUALITY WINE UALITV W•NF 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL "I a 4a -�i q 3, R. 0 _ Z. SO -46Z6= 82_2 -B2 MANUAL__ - - -� 043451 :'3%12%x35 519.34 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL - 043451 u3/12/85 39128.47 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL ^.43451 U3/12/85 1078.78 GUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 043451 J37121-85 475.22 QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL X43451 03/12/85 19252.24 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL „ 0 r T9F5 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -28 -85 PAGE 4 HECK NO. DATE - - - -. - - - - -�— AMOUNT VENDOI ITEM DESCRIPTION ACC7UNT NO- INV- A P.O* N MESSAGE � i ..�-_- 'I C43451 043451 03/12/85 03/12/8.5 787.14 365.77 QUALITY WINE GU.ALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 _ MANUAL - -- -`_ "- 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL_ 0143451 1,3112/ ?5 X81.31 OUK uiN= 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL ' r 9164.64 * n ffrrrr + +r -CKS ° �. ^,4354U -- :.3/12/85 9.57- — TWTN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL J, 43540 X3/1275- 19;54 = —�N;N CITY WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 _: MANUAL C43 5S 3/12/95 13.73- TWIN CITY WI "!E 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 04354u - - 3/12/35 10.80 - TWIV CITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL .. 043545------- T3 /1Z7e5 7,7F.575- -TNfiV CItY N N_ 50-4 28-822-82 n4354u 0'3/12/85 14.40 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL ° 043 54 0 - -- 3/12/85 -- 977.49 - - -T4 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL�n ^43545- 53/12785 7S TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 2 q, 04354U 53/12/95 636.72 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 462.86 ?: MANUAL ni 2,139.43 r r' rrrfrr u� rrf —CKS `R U50L67- - 513/12/45 -- — - -3.15— CAPiTaL CITY C.L-- 50 -4628- 822 -82 - MANUAL — q. 150067 03/12/85 146.76 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628 - 322 -92 MANUAL _ U50067 53/12/8, 0501067 -_ — 031f27?3S 7.20 284:63 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL i., -, CI Y QtSTRI TL 62 -84 MANUAL • 050067 03/12/85 11.70 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 750(;67 - -- 03/12/A,5 i 779.10_ CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL O50'GT �2 /25ig?- 1b.5� CaGIrAL CITY i INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86 MANUAL - -- 3 .. r OS 050 (: 57 C X50 •� � 050 I" '_'50 050 050 e I ,I .rf C50 05C �50 05U I • "I rr• 150 150. - 050 '?50 1 0095 02/ 25/ 85 -906. 37 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 28 -3357 - 000 -00 U1) 5 ?2/25/•95 66.14 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 10- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL__ ,j2/257 -85 - -82.39 Cf1MM OF ?= 11tKUE STATE SALES TAX 23-3 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 095 12/25/85 109533.23 CIMM OF R =VENUE STATE SALES TAX 50- 3357 - 000 -CO MANUAL 4 nos j2/25/85 109533.23- C'14M OF REVENUr' CORRECTION 50- 3357- j00 -00 MANUAL QaS-- �Z7Z577�5� +T7 ^ REVENUE U_ STAT SALES A �3 - - MANUAL 095 02/25/85 11,642.56 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX "'50- 3357 - 002 -00 MANUAL C95 - 02/251R5 10.533.23 COMM OF P,_VENUE STATE SALES TAX 50- 3357 - 003 -00 MANUAL _ s 29,345.93 -- -- -• -- rrr- C K S e 129 03/12/85 915.95 9"LLBOY 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL s 129 X3/12/85 29221.90 BELLBOY 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL (n 129 - - `3/12785 - -` 3;766-:2 -5 Bc*LL9JY 50 -4616- 842 -84 MANUAL - -- 129 J3/12/85 39520.60 BSLLROY 50- 4626 - 362 -86 MANUAL 129 3/12/8` 2.451.65 BELLBOY 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 9 . + n rrr � — -- - - -- -- rrr -CKS a. 135 U3/12/?5 �.n0- EAGLE WIN= 50- 3700- 862 -86 wANUAL 135 3/12/85 10.27- EAGLE WIN- 50- 3710 - 822 -82 ' 1"35 `.ri371� EAGLE WINE MANUAL�� •' - I 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 135 i- 3/12/85 29.76- EAGLE JWINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL - - -- _ 1.248.94 r � �a6.1 t - _ • +••CKS 1. 198'5 C. lF EDINA CHECK 95 (11 35 r50135 115 U.1 35 N!). DATE AMOUNT V ___ ND CHECK R, rER ITEM DESCRIPT 02 -28 -85 ;E # P.O. a MESSA 03/12/85 513.55 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL A/1 2/85 400 E4GL: YI,N_ 50- -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 7 5 3/12%9_ - -�—' 63.57 EAGLE VINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL AIR ?50.135 J3/12/85 19488.:37 EAGLE VINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL in 29G12.Q5 • I ..Ini ffrrfr ffi-CKS ho I12 - - -- 50.138 3%12/85 11.16- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL ' 050138 3/12/85 5.23 - ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL �,RJ J5U13? j3ll2/95 5C'.71- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL +35('3135 - -`- _37i17-8 5 9.3 - FD PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL �I•� 05013? 3/12/85 16.90- ED P41LLIOS 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL � '150138 13/12/85 - -u3 - -- 60.47- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842_ -84 MANUAL /1 Zi85 6.�6- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL - Z'I •► C5U13'1 X3/12/ ?5 10.48- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL "I• y5U.136 ­­7 03/12/85 -2785 62.36- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL_ I 3 F 371 6.i9_- EO PHILLI? 5f)-3710- 862 -86 MANUAL �z ^; 75U136 :.'3/12/85 29535.60 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 750138 - 73/12/85 -- 39023.63 ED PwILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL ?I 15U13,4 15U u3/12%i35 3.11�.R5 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL-- - ti -1, 75013h 73/12/95 261.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL C5U138 03/12/85 - -- -275 55 ?.10 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL_ '�.'; ^501 #o 03%i �ik:?�ED PH ILLIPIS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL �' X50138 03/12/85 839.35 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL I;� 05U1 38 G'3 /12/85 - -- 829._70 ED PHILLIPS 5C- 4628 -_ 86_2 -86 MANUAL f 75ui3A �3%12%A5 523.°7 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL __ j'• `c I '750138 C'3/12185 303.15 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 PANUAL j ^50138 X2/25/95 60.75 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 50- 4630- 822 -82 MANUAL I 750138 UTT 5185 124.DD ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84 PANUAL- - `- ^5U.138 02/25/85 316.25 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86 MANUAL I�< - -- - -- - - -- - -- 12,.734.77 • •r, -.I rrrffr rfr -CKS `• �;01 9/85 32.58- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL �, �5U19(1 u3/12/85 79.53- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL ^. 750190 _ X3/12185 90.14- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL '50190 13/12/85'— 1 629.I2 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 53- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL L j 050190 03/12/85 3.976.54 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 053.19J "— 03/12/?5 4.482.44 GRIGGS COOPER AND C SD- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL . 0501 40 �2 /fST 2 i GRIGGS COOPER INVENTORY 50- 4632- 862 -86 MANUAL 9910.50 + fff -CKS ~I 7502/1 03/12/85 11.25- ! NTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL �� 250271 WT771 5 - INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL C5U2 11 73/12/85 17.46- INTE ;CONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL ?5u2/1 - 73/12/85 45.18- INTE4CONTlN_NTaL PK 57- 3710 - 862 -86 J5u271 '3/12%55 9.81- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL -IC7 r' "50271 73/12/85 1.80 !NTERCONTlNENTAL PK 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL ' 052/1 73/12/85 — ' _ 562.77 INTERCONT!NENTAL PK 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUA ' •� �' 05UZ71 03/12/85 19.20 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 842 -84 - MANUAL " 050271 03/12/85 39966.06 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL ,' AIR 1945 CITY OF E'DINA CHECK R=GIST-R 02 -28 -85 PAGE V • f f f f f• fff — CK ..' 0502"5 63/12/85 3.36- JOHNSON WI NE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL Zia 75L265 03/12/95 14.53- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL l20 ^50235 -- x/121$5 — X2.60- JJHNS]N NINE 5D -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL— " ^SQ2a5 03/12/85 10:117- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 050285 03/12/85 14.01- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 74 - 050295 T2785­ JOHNSON WINE 50= 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 05L'285 63/12185 14.43- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL Z; ^5U.285 03/12/85 22.Q3- JOHNSON W! NE 50- 3710- 862 -86 _MANUAL Tj50265 - - -- 3/1 ?185 - - -- 8:39 =— JaHNS]K NINE 57- 3710 - 862 -�6 MANUAL 086285 S3/12/p5 700. 0 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL U501d5 03/12/95 3 0 JOHNSJN WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL .. -7` 50235---- i;371Z7?T HNSJN -WtNE 50-46M--862-86 MANUAL - - -;'4 05U26 03/12/85 5.10 JOHNSON WINE 5C,- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL •I 35U2b5 ;3/12/R5 ` — 9.30 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 1 050235 — '!3/12785 -- - -3.l0— JOHNSON W_''E 5h-- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL '50295 03/12/.9`. 168.20 JOHNSON WINE 5'1- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 050,285 03/12/85 726.69 JOHNSUN WINE 53- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL .•J, �750�05- 037TZT8 OHN 50-4628-342-84 MANUAL •' 080215 03/12/95 543.89 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MAN UAL , ';50285 1:3/12/85 630.08 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 8_42 -84 MANUAL _ 95J265 - -- �3%12%A5- -- 6.h� ,1pHNSJN W ?,yE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL • ,i )5U235 03/12115 444.71 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 962 -86 MANUAL !15L'2 3 5 L3/12/85 3.90 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -96 MANUAL ,�• - -0502 5 — �37T� %115— b? r MANUAL i JOHNS WINE 0- 628 -862 -8 • 95J265 03/12/85 721.59 JOHNSON WINE SO- 4628 - 362 -86 MANUAL I„ , I 05U265 _ ;)3/12/85 12.60 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL i,,! 59--M7.47 f — • 'I • �- — f f f f f f —_ T CO 50- 3710 - 822 -82 ** *- C K S � •i.� 050,433 03/12/85 CHECK NC_ DATE _ AMOUNT VEND ?2 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO• INV. q P.O. p M_SSAG °_ ��- 050271 03/12/85 6.90 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL I' ^50271 03/1 ?185 -- — 29259.25 - - -'' INTrICONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 05:1271 X3/12/95 SST—` I�iT RC5NTINJE1 tAL PK 5?` 628- 942 -84 MANUAL.-- - ' ?5u271 1.3/12/ ?5 873.�R 111T5RC0NTINENTAL PK 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL U5J271 ^5JZ7T U3/12185 —` 4.20 INTERCONTINENTAL FK 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL L371Z7A Tl3��r1T.iC0NTINENTA[ MANUAL C'5J271 02/25/85 73.75 INTER PKG INVENTORY 50 -4630- 842 -84 MANUAL 02/25/115 73.75 INTER PKG INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822 -82 MANUAL V • f f f f f• fff — CK ..' 0502"5 63/12/85 3.36- JOHNSON WI NE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL Zia 75L265 03/12/95 14.53- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL l20 ^50235 -- x/121$5 — X2.60- JJHNS]N NINE 5D -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL— " ^SQ2a5 03/12/85 10:117- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 050285 03/12/85 14.01- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 74 - 050295 T2785­ JOHNSON WINE 50= 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 05L'285 63/12185 14.43- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL Z; ^5U.285 03/12/85 22.Q3- JOHNSON W! NE 50- 3710- 862 -86 _MANUAL Tj50265 - - -- 3/1 ?185 - - -- 8:39 =— JaHNS]K NINE 57- 3710 - 862 -�6 MANUAL 086285 S3/12/p5 700. 0 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL U501d5 03/12/95 3 0 JOHNSJN WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL .. -7` 50235---- i;371Z7?T HNSJN -WtNE 50-46M--862-86 MANUAL - - -;'4 05U26 03/12/85 5.10 JOHNSON WINE 5C,- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL •I 35U2b5 ;3/12/R5 ` — 9.30 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 1 050235 — '!3/12785 -- - -3.l0— JOHNSON W_''E 5h-- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL '50295 03/12/.9`. 168.20 JOHNSON WINE 5'1- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 050,285 03/12/85 726.69 JOHNSUN WINE 53- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL .•J, �750�05- 037TZT8 OHN 50-4628-342-84 MANUAL •' 080215 03/12/95 543.89 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MAN UAL , ';50285 1:3/12/85 630.08 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 8_42 -84 MANUAL _ 95J265 - -- �3%12%A5- -- 6.h� ,1pHNSJN W ?,yE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL • ,i )5U235 03/12115 444.71 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 962 -86 MANUAL !15L'2 3 5 L3/12/85 3.90 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -96 MANUAL ,�• - -0502 5 — �37T� %115— b? r MANUAL i JOHNS WINE 0- 628 -862 -8 • 95J265 03/12/85 721.59 JOHNSON WINE SO- 4628 - 362 -86 MANUAL I„ , I 05U265 _ ;)3/12/85 12.60 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL i,,! 59--M7.47 f — • 'I • �- — f f f f f f —_ T CO 50- 3710 - 822 -82 ** *- C K S � •i.� 050,433 03/12/85 1.70 PeUST?S 8 SONS 53- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL CO 050433 03/121P5 — -- _ 86.x38 ` -303. P4USTIS 8 SONS 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 5�- 4628 - 822 -82 05 043 3 "2725/85' 68 v8" *S 8 SONS INV =NTORY 5O-T630- 822 -82 MANUAL - -- • 1 92.2 6 f f f f* f ''50435 X50435 ^50.435 050435 -750435- �• i 050435 .13/12/85 -2785 11.79- PRIOR WIN: CO 50- 3710 - 822 -82 0371 -R PR' *p� pIN CO 5�- 3710 = 442 -54 13/12/85 4.45- PRIOR WIN_ CO 50- 3710- 862 -86 113/12/85 -L , 589.57 PRIOR WINE CO 5�- 4628 - 822 -82 rnlYfi ;lry= tlu 03/12/85 222.40 PRIOR WIN= C 50- 4628- 862 -86 *** -CKS o0 I{h e . MANUAL _ �r MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL �z MANUAL MANUAL 19E.5 C )F EDINN CH_CK R TER 02 -28 -85 3E 7 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT V_NO02 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 3 * ** -CKS - ' 6 j.� 050451 L3/12/85 - - -- .I'4 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL oi. 750,451 u3%127-9- 1 .37- OU LI l W'N 50.3710- 822 -82 MANUAL ° r75C451 L- 3/12/85 35.36- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL ;°' ( 35C451 _3/12/85 - - -- � QUALITY WINE 5!0 -3710- 822 -32 MANUAL 7iL1451 �3/12ie`— . ^..6 C- CITYWWINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 PANUAL- -;al ^50451 3/12/85 .11 QUALITY WINE 5'3- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL __. ^50451 _ u3/12185 -Z 19.55- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL �• ^5C451 F/1 /85 19.9 - QUALITY WINE 5Cl- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL "� 0 0451 X3/12/85 16.52 - GUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 6' 050451 _ :3/12/95 6.42- _ QUALITY PINE 5n-3710-862-86 ANUAL_— a "50.451 13%12%85 32.9- QUALITY WINE _ _ 0 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL ___ -l:o '� 050.451 ')50451 03/12/p5 53/12/85 3.25- 19753.14 QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL , ^l' -05 5 ^- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 05045J—'-----U7 S i i ? 7 9T7,76 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 750,451 u3/12/85 926.10 OUALITY WINE SO -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 050451 - 03/12/85 — 19604.14 QUALITY WINE 50_- 4626- 862 -86 J�U451 3/1215 504.63 GUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 _MANUAL MANUAL 'hC451 ^.3/12/85 2.24- QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL d —_- 750.451_ u3 /12/85 2.98- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 1;:I C'50.451 63%121 3 568.7 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MA4UAL 050451 03/12/ °_5 5.56- OUALI *Y WINE 50 -4628- 822.82 MANUAL 1150451 '33/12/95 996.20 QUALITY WINE 50_ -4628- 842 -84_ MANUAL '75 ^451 3/1Z%85— 162.91 QUALITY W:fV_ 50- 4628- $62 -86 MANUAL 050.451 ,:3/12/85 321.43 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 756451 -- J2/25/Q5 165.00 GUALITY WINE INVENTORY 50- 4630- 822 -92 MANUAL t'50451 M5 T5 28.50 7.743.65 • QUALITY WINE INVENTORY 50 -4630- 862 -86 MANUAL e, CKS 05054,; u3/12/?5 — .4.6- —7.1� TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 050 54L-_ ��%1�7�5 TWIN CITY WING 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL -� a 150.54U 113/12/85 .60 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL "50565C54U 33/12/85 23.14 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 :0 Q3%12% -5— 396.13 TWIN CITY WINE 5C- 4628 - 842 -94 MANUAL ' • ,')5054^ u3/12/85 5.70 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 M ANUAL S5I' - - ._....— 417.09 I -150.733 —- 12%25%8! • j ,..I I • f! i i k � I 053174 053114 • f f f ! f # q531 Q8 m 5Vu. 0 POSTMASTER 300.'10 * POSTAGE DUE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 ** *—CKS MANUAL * **-CKS 02/25/85 16139000.09 1ST BANK SOUTHDALE BANK TRANSFER 50-1010-000-00 MANUAL L2/25/85 168900'' ?.00 - 1ST 9ANK SOUTHDALE BANK TRANSFER 50 -1010- 000 -00 MANUAL .00 * * ** -CKS :;2/25785 5.976.59 CROUP HEALTH EN.P HOSP - .. —. - .�_ - -- - -- 1985 CITY OF rDINA CHECK ";r). DATE AMOUNT 5.976.59 . �•,I 053251 _2/25/85 25.700.10 - - -- -- - - - --- -- - 5-9,3zT. r-m VENDOR EDINA HRA CHECK REGISTER ITEM DESCRIPTION DUE FR ACCOUNT NO. TNV. A 10 -1145- 000 -00 02 -28 -85 PANE # P.7. a M7-S3A 8 * * *-CKS MANUAL �•I * * *- _C_KS_ r I -5343 '2/25/85 19.500.54 PEn4 19.500.54 =MP P.RA COt:T 10 -4145- 510 -51 MANUAL � I -- - -- - --- -- + z 9 n ,o li,lf "K f #f fir • ** -CKS _ 20 0'53442- - 0H _MP HOSP 1 X4156 -51 -51 MANUAL -" 13,512.65 z, �P, • ** -CKS '153523 J2/25fF5 8.733.03 SOCIAL SECURITY EMP FICA CONT 10 -4149- 510 -51 MANUAL 21 - 8.7333 ---- - AL.--- - - -'� — ifffrf ^5/067 03/12/85 C'S/067- _03/12/85 r 057129 057129 ^57129 d 2.75 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 184.20 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 1 8b . 9 5__ ,.- 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 842 -84 * ** -CKS I,y MANUAL MANUAL - - -- #*f -CKS 13/12/ ?` 29°72.25 BELL80Y 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL )3/12/85 _ 4.575.05 B --LLB 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL �3/127�35 49'237..5 5 LL30Y �;• 5C- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL -- 11,684.35 * a� •i. .,1q f rf -CKS v ^57135 03 /12 /8 E 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL e 5 13.46- EAGLE WIN:' 1 X57]35 -- 3/12785 :13 =— Ear,LE -7 IN' -3710- 342-94 MANUAL r 057135 73/12/85 .14 EAGLE WIN. 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL ;, ^51135 3/12/85 17.50- EAGLE WIN= e X5 5C- 3710 - 862 -d6 MANUAL en - 7133 - -"-- 73717757 - T[ =-G I �_ -Z32 -. - MANUAL - n57135 u3/12/85 2 • 156.73 EAGLE WIN_ 5C- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL j e inr -57135 03/12/85 7.23- EAGL= WIN:* 50- 4628 - 842 -84 --M ANUAL - X57135 -- -- �3712/S5. -_ -R9^ Z "` EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL -- —�" v 3.629.62 a- n� e •#f #ff 6A ' * *+ -CKS " 1�i I Inn x57139 03V3if85 .40- ED PWILLIDS DISCOUNT 50- 3710 - 073 -00 _ _MANUAL 57138 - --d 3 /lf /95- - - -- 34:7R� er0`P4:LLI °S 50- 3710- 822 -82 - MANUAL I' 057138 03/12/85 4.51- ED PHILLIP'S 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL „I1 C5T13e 3/12165 13.96- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL » 05713 — u371 31. . ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL ' 05713b (,3/12/85 20 .08- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL • 1985 C. )F EDINA CHECK R. TER 02 -28 -85 E 9 I CHECK ND. DATE AMOUNT V --NDOI ITEM OESCRIP >I 057138 03/12/85 1.74- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL ` -! 0157138 J3/12/85 — 58.94- ED PHILLIPS 50- 371.0- 842 -8_4 __M,ANUAL___ -- �5713'i - '- ?3/12iw5- 12.64- ES PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL ' 057133 03/12/85 6. °6- =D PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL , 757138 u3/12/85 13.69- ED PHILLIPS 54 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL e 'i ^571 Y8--- T3%127$S .3� =l TD PHILLIPS 0- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL r" L57136 03/12/85 7.99- ED PHILLIPS 53- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL • ^57139 _ 1t'738.9 5 ED PHILLIPS 50- 46_26 - 822 -82 MANUAL- , 057138 _ __J3/12/85 X3/12/95 291)47.15 ED PHILLIP'S 51- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL -_� ' ^57133 x3/12/85 1.582.75 ED P4ILLIDS 57- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL ;,• '57138 03/12/85 947.95 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL ''5713 ---- 7JDf2—M 225.50 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL •" n5713p 03/12/85 19003.75 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL „ • ^57138 23/12/35 34300 ED P4ILLIDIS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUALS__ =' "57135 _ 3/12%85 R7. ^0 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 -� MANUAL 4 ^57133 C3/12!85 631.75 ED PHILLIPS. 50.- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL " • 95713? 03/12/8° 219.1)0 ED P4ILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL ,<j 057138 _ - `�3 /f2T � ED PHILLIJ'3 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL ;'; 4 ^57138 U3/12185 399.60 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL G! C571 31z - .3/'?/?5 _ 20.70 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 862 -86 _ MANUAL­­... 109514.27 . .... :. + +R -CKS 057190 u3/12/95 43.71- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 5719'_ _ X3/12/85 .40 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL ^5719'0 03/12/95 103.59- GRIGGS COOPER. AND C 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL b P571YU '-3/12/85 72.76- GRIGGS CO3PER AND C 57- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL ,;• 057190 03/12/85 2.135.71 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 5 ^- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL � f °57193 T3 %121 -5 IGGS CO)PER AND C 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 1s 057190 U3/12/85 19.95- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 5'0- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 057190 X3/12/85 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626 - 86_2 -86 MANUAL_,_,a ^57190 _ 3/12/85 _3_._6.39.05 11 2- GRIGGS CO ^PER AND C 51- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 13,752:71 + j. 0572/1 — :.-3/12/85 _ 4.16- TNTERCDNTTN£NTAL PK 50- 3_710_82_2 -82 MANUAL____ T 057271 '-3/12/85 7.71- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL r '572/1 13/12/ °5 7.60- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 14 057271 33/12/85 56.96- TNTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL ,R 157211- u3%12i85�-�94= INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL " V, 057271 03/12./85 32.79- INTERCONT'NENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 862-86 MANUAL „ 0 x572 /1 03/12/85 _ 43.15- �— IN_TEICONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 057211 3112185 .60 IN TER C04TTNENTAL P 50- 4626- 822 -82 -_ -___ MANUAL to I 057211 L3/12/85 2['8.10 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL ` 057271 113/12/85 20843.35 -CT— INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL �^ 057211 l3/12%A3 1 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL ' y 957271 03/12/85 11.40 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL X70 ?572/1 03/12/85 20157.75 TNTERCONTT'NENTAL PK 50 -4626- 862-86 MANUAL_^ a� U 5 7 2 7 1 J3/12/85 385.87 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL b ':57271 U3/12/?5 2.70 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL ,.,.0 U57271 - 03/12/85 380.16 INTERCONTINENTAL FK 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL, 7_ 0, 57211 U3/12/885 4.53 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL " a 057211 ]3/12/85 3.60 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL „A 0 1985 CITY OF °DINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -28 -85 PAGE 10 CHECK N0. DATE 057271 U3/12/85 057271 0;3/12/85 157271 _ 3/12785 J (512 11 3 /C8 /85 I � 8MOUNT V[.ND03 ITEM DESCRIPTTON NT NO. INV. 4 P.O. # MESSAGE 4A7.42 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628- 862 -86 _ 10.50 INM CONTINENTAL PK 59- 4628- 862 -86 �;b39.b5- i`T_2CO,VTINENTAL PK 50-4628- 862 -36 73.75 IMTE2 P.KG INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822 -82 8,061.A4 • JOHNSON W ?NE MANUAL _MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL ■irrr♦ irf -CKS ,cl I - -_ :57265 -- - 3/177?�5 2.25- JOHNSON W ?NE 50- 3710- 822 -82 -- MANUAL z -� ISM U57265 X3/12/85 1.46- JOHNSON WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL " hal' MANUAL !.'57265 --- -- i!3 /12/,Q5 ^03/1-2785 057435 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUA L CO 50- 3710 - 822 -82 0- 572P5 C51265 3/12185 Tj: Z- 6.48- JOHN ",t WI�3E JOHNSON WINE Sb- 3710 - 822 -82 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL PRIOR WIN_ 051285 ".57205- - J3/12/85 - __24.55- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 037727$ _ 03/1278 24:94- JOHNSON WINE 5C- 3710- 842 -84 _MANUAL MANUAL za "I 231.76 C512 *5 U3/12/?5 4.54- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL ' U3/12/F5 _113/12185 - ^51205 J3/12/85 --73/1 8.47- -- -- JCHNS)N W!NE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL " • 057435 0572357 2785— �;T�7}� JOHNSON WIVE 57 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL _ An� '7 ^572,.15 :13/12/85 . ^6 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL R 057235 ^.•57265 _ -- 03/12/85 —` -- 73.00 - JOHNSON WING 50- 4626 - 822 -.82 MANUAL z'� Iz•, MANUAL 3/121 ?5 6 w s 6NW Nr 50- 4626 - 822-82 MANUAL— 051265 1.3/12/85 324.'0 JOHNSJN WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL i iJ51235 - 03/12/85 -- -27F 1.50 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 05728 0371 5 u J H. y' E 5F- _4ZT$ -82 - . ��- 057285 G3/12/85 5.70 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL—" MANUAL ,.� 0572x5 '57 03/12/85 - - 552.24 - - -.a? — JOHNSJrJ WIN E 50- 4.62.8- 822 -82 . MANUAL 23 5 '57235 J3/12/55 JnHNSJY 41 *_ JE S•) -4629- 822 -82 __ 057285 03/12195 6.70 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL MANUAL ' 057 26 5 -- 63/12/85 35';. 8 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 057285 U37T278 5 50-4 6 - -84 057285 03/12/85 16. 9D JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 057285 - 03/12/85 -- -- 20.10_ JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 057235 63/I2/8 1.249 32 JOHNON WINE 50 -4628- 842 -94 MANUAL -- U5T285 051265 63/12/85 J3/12/85 75.(0 227.20 JOHNSON WINE 57- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL i 05728 5­-03-11-2795 JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL " 051235 :3/12/P5 423.58 JOHNSON WINE 50-4628 2 -86 '-50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 4n 051265 - u3/12/85 - 3.27- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL__„ 0572?5 i 3/12/85 03/12/85 1.80 5^ -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL e X057205 JOHNSON1 WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL " 49580.60 i s� • , -- *•+ -CKS ISM f 0574 5- 3/127?L5 pia PRIOR WINE CO __ 50 -3700- 822 -62 MANUAL - - -` 057435 :)3/12/85 4.64- PRIOR WIN= CO 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL ` C57435 03/12/85 .21 PRIOR WIN_ CO 5- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL °J• I' I- 05T43�- 037727$ _ 0 05T435 L3/12/85 231.76 PRIOR _ 41T N_ CO 50-3710-942-84 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL �' 051435 -- U3/12/F5 _113/12185 - .00 PRIOR WIN_ CO 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL " • 057435 1 :�9- PRIOR WIN= CO 50- 4628- t342 -84 MANUAL - _ An� '7 0)7435 •''i 1,3/12/85 125.]( PRIOR WINE CO 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 322.x4 • MANUAL • �I + fi►ir♦ 73 1fi- CKS' "I 19E5 C OF FQ ?NA CHECK N0. DATE AMOU'+1T CHECK 1 3TER TION 02 -28 -85 Mr .GE 11 I' ^57451 - 3/':6/8` - - - -- 5.23- QUALITY Y ?NE pISCOUNT 51- 3710 - 003 -00 MANUAL_ 03/1218.5___ 3 CA- PITAL 15 7 45 1 ..3/12/95- b; i7= fiULITII WIN= TWIN CITY 50 -3710- 822 -92 MANUAL MANUAL DISTRI -- I ^57451 u3/12/P5 6.59- QUALITY d?UE i 05754' 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL TWIN CITY WIN_ SO- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL r'57451 03/12/55 --- 17.37- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 3/12/95 7;' a TWIN CITYY WINE 05)45 `3712715- 2-.21- QUALITY W7NE TWIN CITY 50 -371 - 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL ° - ?57451 3/12/85 18.98- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL °' ^57451 3/12/85 - -- 67.'0- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL C51561 6'�. ?Q 07451 03/1 2795 7.75- QUALITY N_ *N' 957561 50- 3710 - 862 -86 - - MANUAL -- 1 '21 50- 4628- 842 -84 "57451 .3/12/85 11.19- QUALITY W ?NE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL ;'i' j f757451 057451 t- 3/12/85 -- T3712%g5 15.95- QU' -LITV-W' NE 50- 3710- 862 -36 MANUAL ,I nl 8.6T QUALITV WINE 50 - 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 057451 ^3/12155 39355.21 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 057451 X3/12/85 - 797.90 oUALITY W ?NE 50- 4626_862 -86 ^57451 )3/12/85 343.9p QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 _MANUAL__- _ MANUAL -.. -; ^57451 03/12/85 329.35 OUaLITY VINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL - ^57451 u3/1 2/P5 - - -` 610.35 -.Tf QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 057451 X3112/8 5 9 49 QUALITY WINE 57 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL ^.57451 L3/12/85 559.33 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL ' 057451 -57451 _ C3/12185 _ _387.65 QUALITY WINE_ 50 -_ 4628- 862 -8_6 9i 03/'3/85- 25.95 0UALITY WINE ?NV E -NT ORY 50 -4630- 862 -86 __ _MANUAL MANUAL t� 057451 .3/08/85 195.64 QUALITY WTNE DISCOUNT 50 -4632- 822 -82 MANUAL ^51451 v3 /OS /8`. 284.21 -2548 QUALITY WINE INVENTORY 50- 4632- 842 -84 MANUAL__ !17451' J3 %F7 QUALITY WINE INVENTORY 50.4632- 862 -86 MANUAL " 8,807.51 * C c- f� vi. f f f f f f * ** -CKS 05Y415 x31 +_8%35 79145.12 MEO CENTE1 EMP HOSPITALIZATION 10- 4156- 510 -51 MANUAL 79145.12 * ****t -- - t4ffff 764'67 03/1218.5___ -.50- CA- PITAL �- - - -- . *. -CKS ", 051 54U 75)540 -- '3/12/85 ,3012/ 4.16- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL DISTRI 50- 4628 - 822 -82 .9 - TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL i 05754' C3/12/85 208.02 TWIN CITY WIN_ SO- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL r5754U -- -- 03/12/85 - -- - - - -- 4.20 TWTN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL n5754U 3/12/95 5.70 TWIN CITYY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 - - MANUAL C5754u r.1311 2/95 247.47 TWIN CITY WIN 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL �- - -- - - 449.4'3 + +•• -CKS -- C51561 L3/12/85 6'�. ?Q V ?NITALIA 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL -- 957561 23/12/85 291.70 VINITALIA 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL I 351. "0 • ;'i' f f f f f f * ** -CKS 05Y415 x31 +_8%35 79145.12 MEO CENTE1 EMP HOSPITALIZATION 10- 4156- 510 -51 MANUAL 79145.12 * ****t *•* -CKS 764'67 03/1218.5___ -.50- CA- PITAL CITY DISTRT 50- 3700 - 822 =82 0640ti7 03/12/85 .70 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628 - 822 -82 _MANUAL MANUAL- r164 U67 '3/12/85 3.60 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 064,;67 _^ - -64U67 03/12185 150.99 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 03712/85 3.6U CBPITAI CITY OiSTRT 50- 4628- 842 -84 - -MANUAL C64U67 03/12/85 166.50 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE___ r (-� -- ^64067 ^ - -_ 03/12/85 1064067 03/12/85 w, _I r f r a r r AMOUNT VTND02 CHECK REGISTER TEM DESCRIPTION ACCOU 02 -28 -85 PAGE 12 3.60 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL ; 144.00 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL -f; r +r -CKS Ir. X64135 ! -64135 ^.64135 j '_'64135 !64135 J3/ 08/85 03/12/95 - - X3/12755 3/12/95 ,3 /12 1.06- .11 1'� :�J= 19.44- .11 EAGLE WINE DISSCOUNT EAGLE WINE t�rL� WIN- EAGLE WI'lE cAGL= MINE 50 -3710- 003 -00 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50 -3710- 842 -84 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL - -- MANUAL MANUAL "i A 0641 ?5.- _- ___':37f2785 -- 31J,d� —EAGLE 17INc - 37162 -86 MANUAL 38 ^64135 03/12/85 695.74 EAGLE WIN,- 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL B, 064135 03/12/85 -- 5.29- EAGL= WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL_ �• ''64135 - J3/12/F5 — 972;1$ ^GL NI "J 5D -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 38 ,- ^64135 03/12/95 5.52 - EAGL= WIN. 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL ?;s ^.64135 - J3 /12 /85 !T3 2.97- EAGLE WIN. 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 35---- 064135 /lZ /85 3:i0= cAGL �IN� 5= 1.28- 862 -86 MANUAL 30.12- r !'64135 03/121$5 1.532.03 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 7.43_- `— 1 064135 J3 /OA /8_ 97.?0 EAGLE WIN. INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86 MANUAL „ ED PHILLI =S 3 : 14 :1-5 MANUAL 38 - -_ -- - - 2.0(?- # t # f r # PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 36 w3/12/85 789.90 264134 064138 03/12/85 03/12/85 7.55- f.0 ONILLIpS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL „. '•64135 - - -- 10.95- - -- ED PHILLIaS 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 1 ED :3/12i8c 2 ^./.5= �]?N2LLI�� 5�J- 3710 - 822 -82 — I, MANUAL - 175.50 l. 0641 1641 - --7641 C64 1 C641 x64 1 0641 641 - 0641 r 0641 0641 ^64 1 0641 0641 -- 0641 C64I 0641 0641 _1 ^641 - _U641 .I 0641 0641 i CA41 . i n641 0641 64 -1. 0641 01 38 38 03/12/85 03/12/85 9.99 - 15.'0- EO ED PHILLIPS PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL MANUAL 378"' 03 71 -2TS 5 . gi p-A I C L I P 50-3 3TO--T2-Z--8-2- MANUAL 38 )3/12/85 17.,72- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 38 03/12/85 - - -- 20.96- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 -_ 842 -_84 MANUAL 3n__ :,3/12/85 >I -ifI _ eDPiiiLLI�S 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 38 G3/12/85 6.57- ED PHILLID,S 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MAN +JAL 33 0 /12/85 ��'3712719'5 18.54 - EO PiILLI'S 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL LJ. 35---- _V5;94= �D�91LL X62- P�A1�UAL 36 J3/12/85 30.12- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 3a - _ X3/12/85 - 7.43_- `— ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 3� 3/12/F5 - Z4-56= ED PHILLI =S ? -37 0- 862 -86 MANUAL 38 :3/12/e5 2.0(?- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 36 w3/12/85 789.90 E7 PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 3? 371 7. _ . D Y P 0- 6 6 =8 -84 MANUAL ,° 38 0.3/12/85 4.799.43 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL ' 38 "--- J3/ ^_8/85 175.50 ED PHILLI °S INVENTORY 50- 4626 - 862 -86 N,ANUAL 38 '3/12/A� 1�S0�.TTE'J PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MIANUAL -- 3 t: 3/1218° 1.524.25 ED PHILL13S 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 38 3/12185 547.57 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 3$- T`371Z-/?f 377. HILLIP 50-4628-822-82 MANUAL 5 38 03/12/85 1.022.25 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL a 38 ^_3/12/85 - - -- 499.57_ —ii.15 ED PAi_LLIPS 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 3cF- 73/12%39 D PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL - - -- ' 3F 03/12/85 1•C4R.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL I; 33 ---U ^ 3/12185 328.55 ED PHILLIPS 5,- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 7 55 37T2 f 8 5 19227095 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL ' 38 r5 /12/85 100.00 ED PHILLIaS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL ' 19E5 C OF EDINA CHECK R ;TFR 02 -28 -85 GE 13 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT V_N001 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. a P.O. r N MESSAGE f ff -CKS ol! 06413b '3/12/85 371.70 ED PHILLIPS JOHNSON 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL ' 7 064138 - -- 1,13/12/85 __�3 926.85 - - -_ -- -61.5 - ED PHiLLI °S JOHNSON 50 -4628- 862 -86 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL �;e 06413? %:'f? %p5`----- 03/12/85 ED c P HILLI o S _ INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 842 -84 - _MANUAL MANUAL 4� n' I 064Co53%12%85 199343.22 .34- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL ' �- 06428.5 U3/12/85 23.71-- J0HN30N WINE tff -CKS IA a '164190 J3/12/ ?5 -- 1.33 - GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -3710- 822 -82 M4NUAL 2 ^64197 73/12/x5 20.36- G=IGGS CO�PERAAND C 5)- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL WINE 50- 4626 - 542 -84 06419_ u3/12/P5 29.':3- GRTGGS COOPER AND C 5'0- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE WINE I C641 0j - - -- .:3/12/85 91.50 GRIGGS C01PER AND C 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL n JOHNSON 06416; �.�%127 -9 �z3fi�7 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 03/12/85 L . r C6419� ^3/12/85 1,451.64 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL Qi - - - - -- 2,950.82 + - — .Q * ++ -CKS ,,i� - 064-Z 11 I "JTE�CONTINENTAL PK 50 -3710- 822 -82 -- 11 MANUAL ti 642/1 03/12/85 1.39 INTERCONT ?NENTAL PK 57- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 064271 - - -- x'3/12/85 7. ?9- 779.34- IVTE2CONTTN=NTAL_ _ PK 57- 3710- 822 -82 . MANUAL I`;` !642/1 3/12%5 INiERCONT ?NENTAL FK 50- 3710 - 842 -84 __ MANUAL - 64211 73/12/85 11.86- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL X64271 "3/12/?5 1.29- IN TER C0NTTNENTAL PK 50-3710-862-86 V. (?642 f1 0642/1 03/12/85 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 39.79- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 7642 11 - 3/12185 - 969.04 - - -- -1.b INTERCONTINENTAL PK 5,1- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL______ 064271 ^64211 x3/12%85- R !JTERCONTTNENTAL PK 50 -4b26- 822 -82 - MANUAL I' 73/12/85 11.7Q INT= RCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL .1 . 064111 _ X3/12/85 3.917._1 TNTEICONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL I ^64271 '03112185 1,989-.37, INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 064271 0 °3/12185 8.10 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL °'• 064271 - )3/12/85 - -- -- 70.25- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL Q64Z /1 _ ?3/12/85 364.95 INTERCONTTNENTAL FK - 50 -4628- 822 -82 -" -- MANUAL !� 064271 3/12 5 )/8.30 3 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL X64271 - - -- 1112185 593.4.5 -3.3� INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL -I• 064271 3%127 5 1NT�:2CONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628 - 842 -84 < MANUAL I 064211 ;13/12/85 64.75 INTERCONTINENTAL PK S0- 4628 - 362 -86 I MANUAL C64271 '"642/1 73/12185 .6'0 TNTEICONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628_862 -86 s'- MANUAL_ J = 3%12/81 .90 ^J TER CONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL = i ,064271 ;13/12/85 125.85 TNTERCONTTNENTAL PK 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL - - - -- -- — 79827.85 f f ff -CKS ol! 154205 u3%12�,4' - -- 21.79- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL �•,i I_C64cb5 C64Zd5 :;3/12/85 21.-4- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL �;e 03/12/85 20.49- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL n' I 064Co53%12%85 .34- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL ' �- 06428.5 U3/12/85 23.71-- J0HN30N WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 �,�• MANUAL 06420 -- 63/12/85_- 1,•024.90 _ JOHNSON WINE I 504626- 842 -84 n; f 064265 064265 X3/12%85 03/12/85 4.50 1, ^89.76 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 542 -84 _MANUAL MANUAL - - -- 064285 03/12/85 18.30 JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE WINE 53- 4 6 28- 82 2- 8 2 MANUAL 12 e 064Z65 C312/85 13090 JOHNSON NINE 50- 4628 -8 822 -82 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL, MANUAL ' lj64Z85 03/12/85 1,052.36 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL �• 1985 CITY OF FOINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -28 -85 PAGE 14 CHECK NO. DF.TE AMOUPIT V=NDO? ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. It MESSAGE =1 0642?+5 03/12/85 .30 JOHN30V WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 3 064265 L3/12/85 17.47 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL C642s5 -- - X3/12785 - - - -`— - "20.40 -- Ji)HNSON WIPJE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 7642h5 3/12/8'. 1,185.115 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 4,345.37 + P �1U a•* -CKS -,1 2. !'6436? �31'3%fl5 2,523.? -� MUTU4l EMP DISABILITY 10 -4158- 510 -51 MANUAL s �, 2 ♦523.20 + ' fft rr+ f f +•. CKS 'PI 064457 U3/12/85 198.96 PAUSTIS & SONS 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL I'pl 064433 -- - 3/127 65 —3�; 3 5aUSiIS & S ^NS 5? -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL -- 264453 - 3/12/85 3.�5 PAUSTIS & SONS 5C- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL "I 064433 :13/12/85 1.50 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL -- TJ3/12/8514 6 .4-0 PfUSTiS a SO`JS 50= 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 064433 03/12/85 6.110 PAUSTIS & SONS 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 064433 '3/12/85 371.76 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 862 -36 MANUAL _ a 064433 �3/ ,9185 -` - -- 65 ;38 P4USTIS & SONS INVENTORY 57- 4632 - 842 -84 TMANUAL 534.31 • ,# � ••• -CKS 13' ;{ 064455 1:;3/12/85 6.52- pRr02 WIN= CO 50- 3710- 822 -82 __MANUAL __ J '64435 - - -- .3/12/85 - -- f4:�3= P�IOfi WIh� Cb 57 -3110- 842 -84 MANUAL C64435 :13/127%15 326.24 PRIOR WIN_ CO 50- 4628- 822 -82 MA "DUAL 1164435 1'.3/12/85 736.38 1 PRIOR WIN= CO 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL .J. �- - - -- ♦ . f - -- -- - - - -- -' -- r.+ +CKS_ - 764451 U3/12/95 12.40- QUALITY WINS 513-3710- 822 -32 MANUAL n64451 ()3/12/85 10.57- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -32 MANUAL__- -- ^64451 - - -- 7371 -278- 51:39= OIIALT?'Y­V_'RE _57- _37 � -82 2 -8 2 MANUAL 064451 X3/12/85 88.07- + ^I r CUALITY WIN: •.57.3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 064451 X3/12/84 6_.81- QUALITY WINE 57 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL i,. 1.64451 - -- x3/12/35 �J .37 QUALITT NINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 -MANUAL -- 064451 U3/12/83 25.30- QUALITY WINE 57- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL C64451 03/12/85 .'' QUALITY WINE 50- 5 3710- 342 -84 MANUAL - 064451- x3792183 0 ALI Tl Q E 0 - 3-7-1 _ -86 2 -86 MANUAL 064451 L3/12/85 5.65- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL ('64451 03/12/85 79.48- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL Pi 064451 - -- 3 /1218 5- 2 i .47- 0t7ALITY N?71 E: 55 ;3716 -8 862 -86 - -- MANUAL r ^64451 ()3/12785 2,569.73 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL i ^.64451 U3/12/85 33.80- QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL C644 5T u37T-27 8 t 4,p446 QU L I TV WINE 50-4626-842-84 MANUAL I 064451 03/12/ 95 3,974.14 QUALITY WIN= 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL ^64451 23/12/85 528.54 _ QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL___ _ 764451 - u`3/12785 620•.70 0(I A'L.TY WIYc 5:j- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 064451 1:3/12/85 340. 90 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 064451 X3/12/85 1,265.')O QUALITY NINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL �� -- rb4 Z 5i -- 73 %1Z/ - QUA ITTY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL -� 1164451 1.3/12/85 16.68• QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL ': �i . v '1995 C OF Ef1IRA CHECK F, TZR 02 -28 -85 GE 15 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT - VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV. # P.O. 0 MESSAGE ,+ P64451 03/12/85 1IC23.93 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL , MANUAL ^64451 J3/1218`. 232.99 QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL a 10- 4252- 321 -30 MANUAL 149700.97 • u3/12185 9.2 8.39 - ---__ -- n 10 -4252- 322 -30 i i f f t r w`vl.i 071391 33/12/35 19889.54 NOR.T4FRN STATES 7 10- 4252 - 330 -30 054540 03/12/85 3. ^5- TWIN CITY WIN. 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL o' 10- 4252 - 345 -30 ('6454u 03/12/85 _ 3_.01 -_ TWIN_CITY NINE 50- - 842_ -84 MANUAL_____�I ELECTRIC 10 -4252- 358 -30 ^6454 3/12%85 1.15- TWIN CdTY WINS _3_710 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL "I 10 -4252- 375 -30 _54540 ;3/12/85 3.00 TWIN CITY WIMZ 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 440 -44 "�454U x_3/12/85 152.71 TWIN CITY WINL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL a{ 10 -4252- 460 -46 3454u J3/127 a5- TWIN CITY ;LINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL ELECTRIC 06454u 03/12/9 1511.97 TWIN CITY WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 9 05454(? .,3/12/R5 - 1.50 TWIN CITY WIN: 50- 4_628- 862 -86 MANUAL_ C5454, ui /12%F5 57,?5 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 _ _ MANUAL .'1 t, 363.02 •I * **-CKS ^.54538 031 ^8/95 184.30 WESTE2N EMP LIFE INSURANCE 10 -4157- 510 -51 MANUAL 184.90 trr -CKS -' :67174 C3/n8185 1509000.70 1ST SO BANK TRANSFER 50- 1010- 000 -00 3N I MANUAL „. 167174 3/'8/$5 1519000. =0- 1ST SO BANK TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 070 -00 MANUAL �f �� i rrffrr ;y ^67430 03/12/85 i � :�l ■ittt# � 'i "b7525 it3712%9c� 061187 .13/12/85 19.3 32.5 0 P�: RA 199332.50 * 8.361.69 STAT 89361.59 * 290-^.70 2.J00.')0 * U S POSTMAST'R EMPLOYERS CONT EMP CONTRIBUTION POSTAGE 10 -4145- 510 -51 10- 4149 - 510 -51 1n -��on- sin -s� + +• -CKS MANUAL t' • ** -CKS MANUAL 14 ffr -CKS I 3e MANUAL ! - *! -CKS 1 '171391 C3/12/85 277.37 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 301 -30 MANUAL 071391 13/12/85 12.094.01 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 321 -30 MANUAL 071391 u3/12185 9.2 8.39 NORTH°_iAN STATES ELECTRIC 10 -4252- 322 -30 MANUAL w`vl.i 071391 33/12/35 19889.54 NOR.T4FRN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 330 -30 MANUAL 171391 - 03/12/95 - 492.27 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 345 -30 171 ?91 J3 %1Z %RS 59.19 NORT47RN STATES ELECTRIC 10 -4252- 358 -30 vMANUAL. -- MANUAL y 071391 03/12/85 29456.68 NnRTH ERIN STATES ELECTRIC 10 -4252- 375 -30 MANUAL I! n,71391_ 0.3/12/85 - 19019.13 N7RTI -RN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 440 -44 MANUAL 771391 ^71391 u3712�5 J3/12185 39.63 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10 -4252- 460 -46 MANUAL b I 275.19 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 500 -50 MANUAL 4 1985 CITY O OF TDIN- C CHECK REGISTER 0 02 -28 -85 P "_GE 16 CHECK NO. D D.TE A AMDUIIT V VENDOR I ITEM DESCRIPTION A ACCOUNT N09 INV. A A P.0. 4 M'SSAG- 071391 0 03/12/85 1 19143.38 N N1RTMER'N STATES E ELECTRIC 1 10- 4252- 520 -52 M MANUAL (j C71391 0 0.13/12/85 1 1473.69 N NORTHERN STATES E ELECTRIC 1 10- 4252 - 540 -54 _ ^71391 - 3%12%9 - 44.25 N N RTH_.N STATE_ E ELECTRIC 1 10- 4252 - 629 -62 M _MANUAL 7713 1 ; ;33/12/45 z z , � � r, ELECTRIC 1 10- 4252 - 646 -64 M MANUAL -71391 U U3/12/91 7 793.15 N NORTH=R'N STATES E ELECTRIC 2 2J- 1130- Oa0 -00 M MANUAL 391 7 7!3!72785- _ _177 -, 7 � �T_iFV -11 S A Tt.3 E ELECTRIC - -MANUAL 071391 : :;3/12/85 4 41.53 N N ^RTHERN STATES E ELECTRIC 2 26- 4252 - 689 -68 M MANUAL 071391 ! !, °3/12/85 1 16. ^0 N NORTHERN STATES E ELECTRIC 2 27- 4252 - 661 -66 _ MANUAL 771 391 - D3/127?3 - - NORTH -RN 51'AiEa E ELECTRIC 2 27- 4252 - 662 -66 M _ M e': - °.3/12195 5 5.603.92 N NORTiERN STATES E ELECTRIC 2 28- 4252 - 708 -70 M MANUAL -r` 7 03/12/95 4 465.27 N NORTHERN STATES E ELECTRIC 2 29- 4252 - 721 -72 M MANUAL 71397 - r3J1Z7�c- 2 2.3673.43 - - -NOR TERN -STTA E.S _ RIC 4 4 ) -C- 1- M ^..71391 0 03/12/8`_ 1 149509.96 N NORTHERN STATES E _L_C R 40 -4252- 803 -80 M MANUAL 071391 X X3/12/85 1 186.57 K KORTHERN STATES E ELECTRIC 4 4u- 4252- 804 -30 M MANUAL ^713 ?1 - .,3/12-115 - X46.2 :� - NOrZiH�RV STAtE� E - - - -- - -- H4NUA!_ --- 33/12/95 6 632. ?1 N NORT4-RN STATES E ELECTRIC 5 50- 4252•- 841 -84 M MANUAL ^71391- 1 13/12!85 3 352.14 N NORTH -RN STATES E ELECTRIC 5 50 -4252- 861 -86 M MANUAL C K S n 071396 u3/'2/85 6 ^.25 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 10- 4226 - 160 -16 MANUAL 071 396 "3/12/85 _54.95 NORTHWESTERN 8_LL TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 460 -46 MANUAL I, :� - - -� - -. ' ^7134V- - -- 33%1275 029'- N'?fifiWEST_RN BELL TELEPHONE 4256- 5D0 -SO MANUAL ") 911396 33/185 39332. 3D NORTHWESTE _L_. RN BELL TF E? 2/ _ HONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL n - . 71396 03/12/85 45.57 N ^RTHWEST_RN B-LL TELEFHD_NE - 10m-42_56-646- 64 MANUAL 4 - - -- -- - - -- - 0/1396 -- J3/121E+' _ -` -- _512.7?- NORTHWEST =RN BELL TELEPHONE 20 -4 4256 -622__ - MANUAL - - ^71396 .:3/12/85 108.38 NORTHWEST_RN BELL TELEPHONE 20- 4256- 628-62 MANUAL 071396 3/12/85 1417.33 N7RTAWEST7RN BELL TELEPHONE 23 -4256- 611 -61 MANUAL - -- 071396 �37T779 NORTHa STc N BELL TELEPHONE 9 -68 MANUAL 071396 13/12185 359.34 N ^RTHWEST_RN B "LL TELEPHONE 27- 4256 - 661 -66 MANUAL . 971396 03/12/95 337.38 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 28- 4256- 708 -70 MANUAL �713vo - - u3�12� -5� 46. ?8 - -" N� TiaEST .iN BEL "L TELEPHONE 29 -4256- 721 -72 MANUAL - -� "^ 971396 03/12/8 i 99.34 NC'RTHWEST_RN BELL TELEPHONE 40- 4256 - 301 -80 MANUAL 071396 3/12/85 99.34- NORTHWEST_RN BELL CORRECTION 40- 4256- 801 -80 kANUAL -99.2 4W_i T'TNBE L EL_PH , MANUA L °1 -' 0713 96 13/12185 210.30 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 40- 4256- 803 -80 MANUAL 371396 3/12/85 155.75 NORTHWESTERN 8£LL TELc`P4±ONE 50- 4256- 821 -82 MANUAL _ _! -,I* C71 796 - -_. - ,3/12/85- - -- 145:21 �np HNcST =R BELL TELEPHONE - - -5�- 4256 - 841 -84 MANUAL - 771396 23/12/85 132.98 N!RTiW_rSTERN BELL TELEPHONE 50- 4256- 861 -86 MANUAL s° 5398.34 • - 6,847.67 • * •-CKS 150,334.91 FUND 10 TOi4L GENERAL FUND Computer checks 11's 61132 1 9414. Ti FU'dD 20 TOTAL PARK FUND thru 61152 62000 62009 F21.; 59 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 65.53 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING FOOL FUND APFi 0's "-' T70„ F,,,l "MENT. FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND - 5,941.30 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 512.25 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 179374.9 0 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUKC F,'..:_,_________ 251,338.92 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 428840.17 FINANC_ DIREJfUR DATE �z 6,847.67 • * •-CKS 150,334.91 FUND 10 TOi4L GENERAL FUND Computer checks 11's 61132 1 9414. Ti FU'dD 20 TOTAL PARK FUND thru 61152 62000 62009 F21.; 59 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 65.53 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING FOOL FUND APFi 0's "-' T70„ F,,,l "MENT. FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND - 5,941.30 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 512.25 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 179374.9 0 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUKC F,'..:_,_________ 251,338.92 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 428840.17 FINANC_ DIREJfUR DATE �z 428840.17 FINANC_ DIREJfUR DATE �z